The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2873ORDINANCE NO. 2873 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, amending the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Capital Facilities Element and amending Ordinance 2818. WHEREAS, the City of Port Angeles adopted its present Comprehensive Plan on June 28, 1994, by Ordinance No. 2818; and WHEREAS, the City of Port Angeles has established a process for amending the Comprehensive Plan by Ordinance No. 2858; and WHEREAS, amendment proposals have been received, review given, public notices provided, and public hearings held in a timely manner; and WHEREAS, the proposed 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments have been reviewed for consistency with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan, the Clallam County - Wide Planning Policy, and the Growth Management Act; and WHEREAS, the School Concurrency Task Force met on September 15, October 13, November 10, December 15, 1994, and February 3, 1995, and completed its report to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the 1995 -2000 Capital Facilities Plan following a duly noticed public hearing on September 6, 1994; and WHEREAS, the SEPA review of the proposed amendments has been completed and the EIS for the Comprehensive Plan was adopted for the proposed amendments on April 25, 1995; and WHEREAS, following public hearings, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing, has considered the Planning Commission's recommendations, and has entered its findings and conclusions addressing the elements set forth in PAMC 18.04.060 and in support of adopting the proposed 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance 2818 and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby amended by adopting the following 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments: A. The Comprehensive Land Use Map shall be replaced with the attached Exhibit "A ", which includes the following changes: Approximate Location Current Land Use Designation New Land Use Designation 8th & Race Water & Jones Tumwater & Fourth 8th & H 8th & G 18th & D C & 18th C Extension Pine & Lauridsen Melody Lane Wabash & Eckard Low Density Residential and Open Space Low Density Residential Industrial High Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Commercial Commercial Open Space Commercial High Density Residential Low Density Residential High Density Residential High Density Residential High Density Residential High Density Residential & Low Density Residential Low Density Residential B. The Capital Facilities Element shall be amended as follows: 1. Capital Facilities Element Objective A.1 is amended to read as follows: Objectives 1. 1. At the time Comprehensive Plans for the City and the County are reviewed. one representative each from the Port Angeles School District No. 121, Clallam County. and the City of Port Angeles will meet to consider possible recommendations for amendment of policies affecting school facilities. 2. Capital Facilities Element Policy B.3 shall be amended to read as follows: 3. The City shall not approve any development that is not served with potable water service at or greater than the following level of service standards at the time of development: Single family units: Multi- family units 2 gallons per minute @ 30 psi (fire -1000 gallons per minute @ 20 psi) 1 gallon per minute @ 30 psi (fire per Uniform Fire Code) Commercial: per ISO-guidelines Uniform Fire Code Industrial: per Uniform Fire Code 3. Capital Facilities Element Policy B.5 shall be amended to read as follows: 5. The City shall not approve any development that is not served with electrical service at or grater than a level of service standard of 120/220 volts- per3erviee 118 volts (120 volt base) at the time of development. 4. Capital Facilities Element Policy C.1 shall be amended to read as follows: 1. The Port Angeles School District should develop a capital facilities plan, which the City will consider for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan. The capital facilities plan should contain at least a six -year plan for public financing of such facilities as may be necessary to provide adequate public schools at or grater than the following level of service standards in order to meet anticipated increases in student enrollment, which may be anticipated based on the School District's projected enrollment figures and residential growth as provided for in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan: High School 125 square feet of permanent, appropriate educational space per student, Middle School 104 square feet of permanent, appropriate educational space per student, Elementary School 100 square feet of permanent, appropriate educational space per student. If capacity is inadequate to house students at the established level of service standards (LOS) and adequate school funding is not available, then the demand for new facilities will be reduced (e.g. through year round use of schools or by matching grade band enrollment to facility capacities) or the level of service standards will be reduced to keep both schools and housing development affordable to the majority of Port Angeles School District residents. Imposition of Growth Management Act impact fees on or denial of new development will not be used as a measure to prevent further degradation of school services. unless the reduced level of service standards are 5. The Capital Facilities Element shall be amended by adopting the 1995 -2000 Capital Facilities Plan, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and which shall become an attachment to the Comprehensive Plan. Section 2. Said 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments shall be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan as kept on file with the City Clerk. Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on June 20, 1995. ATTEST: Brdeptixilgtorx City Carol A. Hagar, 'eputy APPROVED AS TO FORM: Craig D. utson, City Attorney PUBLISHED: June 25, 19 9 5 (By Summary) Exhibit "A" 0 2 w z ∎lefliiIuilf•In ow ' ens t - es • ent a edium Deneit Resident a • •en pac= or more detailed ma. see 1200 scale map at City of Port Angeles 'lannmg Depar men; 96 LAND USE MA - CHAN E EXHIBIT "B" CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CITY OF PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON FOR THE YEARS 1995 TO 2000 pORTgN"( Appl,4,01„,.. 0N • *As ■•■ L JOAN K. SARGENT Mayor PROSPER OSTROWSKI GARY BRAUN Deputy Mayor Councilman LARRY DOYLE JAMES HULETT Councilman Councilman CATHLEEN MCKEOWN LARRY SCHUELER Councilwoman Councilman BRUCE BECKER ORVILLE CAMPBELL JEFF POMERANZ City Manager CFP COMMITTEE BOB TITUS, Chairman JULIE BONDY LARRY DOYLE CHUCK TURNER GARY BRAUN JACK PITTIS 1f September 6, 1994 CITY OF PORT ANGELES 321 EAST FIFTH ST.. P.O. BOX 1150 PORT ANGELES. WASHINGTON 98362 PHONE (206) 457 -0411 To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: The State of Washington, Growth Management Act of 1990 (GMA) requires that the City of Port Angeles develop a Comprehensive Plan which contains land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, public facilities, and transportation elements. The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is the document which communicates the City's plan for capital construction and purchases for a six year period as required by the GMA. The CFP is a document which provides a program of proposed major capital expenditures throughout the City. It provides a multi -year look at the strategies and financing requirements for major capital programs. The City of Port Angeles Capital Facilities Plan attempts to project six years into the future for major construction, infrastructure improvements, and land use. The plan also provides a funding strategy for each year, utilizing existing and projected funding sources. CFP PROCESS The 1995 -2000 CFP process began in April with the appointment of a seven member CFP Committee to review and make recommendations on the capital projects submitted by City Departments. The Committee established rating criteria to use in ranking projects and over the course of several meetings established a rough order of priorities within the three project categories; General Purpose, Transportation, and Enterprise. The Committee also held two public meetings on May 31, 1994 to solicit comments from the public. Citizens were asked to express their priorities for capital spending as well as to submit additional projects for consideration by the Committee. As a result of these meetings five additional projects were added for consideration bringing the total number of projects to well over a hundred. In June and early July the Committee reviewed existing and potential funding sources for the various capital projects and working within the limits of available financing split the list of projects into funded and non - funded categories. The Committee then proceeded to rank order the projects on the funded list and to identify the specific source(s) of funding for each project. The culmination of several months worth of weekly meetings was a draft 1995 -2000 Capital Facilities Plan which was discussed at a public hearing held during the regular July 19, 1994 City Council Meeting. Following the public hearing the City Council set a Council work session for August 9, 1994 to further review the project submittals in detail. At the work session several projects which were on the Funding Not Available list were deemed to merit further consideration as funding sources had become available during the course of the Committees deliberations. As a result eight additional projects were added to the Funded List for inclusion in the adopted 1995 -2000 Capital Facilities Plan. FINANCING OF THE CFP Traditionally, Port Angeles' capital program is funded primarily through the issuance of general obligation bonds and revenue bonds. Even with such funding, the City has still financed a significant portion of previous capital projects from current operating revenues. As part of the 1995 -2000 Capital Facilities Plan, we continue to utilize this "pay -as- you -go" financing mechanism, but to a lesser degree than in previous years. There are several reasons why debt financing must play a greater role in our capital program but the major reason is that operating expenses are growing at a faster rate than revenues and thus leave less money left over to provide for capital spending. Unfortunately, State and Federal mandates continue to impose substantial capital funding requirements which are dictating two courses of action which the City has not pursued as revenue sources in recent years. To satisfy the need for additional revenues for projects which must be funded in 1995, it is recommended that general fund reserves be tapped for the first time in over five years. All told the CFP anticipates that over $370,000 of current general fund reserves will be required to fund General Purpose projects contained in the 1995 -2000 Capital Facilities Plan. While the use of general fund reserves is controversial, the second source of additional funds is almost certain to spark some controversy. The CFP Committee is recommending that the City establish two new utilities in 1996; a Street Utility and a Stormwater Utility. Over $350,000 annually will be required from these two new sources of revenue in order to satisfy the funding needs of the CFP. Obviously, we will need to devote considerable time and effort to communicate the need for these utilities to the public. Otherwise a significant number of projects cannot be completed. A complete breakdown of all projects with funding sources' identified is contained in the Appendix. It should also be noted that all costs are in 1994 dollars and are estimates subject to change. CFP /OPERATING BUDGET RELATIONSHIP Although the City publishes this separate CFP document. the capital program budget remains an integral part of the overall City financial program. The following chart provides a recap of the City's entire financial program and the capital budget's relation to it. Capital Projects $12,873,045 General Fund Operations 9,230,103 Enterpnse Fund Operations 28,831,694 All Other Funds 5,354,952 TOTAL $56,289,794 51% 2 10% ■ Capital Projects • General Fund Operations ■ Enterprise Fund Operations GAIT Other Funds 995 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN HIGHLIGHTS Following are highlights from the 1995 capital program: completion of the compost facility at the landfill ($650,000) William Shore Pooi enhancement and repairs ($400,000) Waterfront Trail expansion from Francis Street to Morse Creek ($570,600) downtown sidewalk and watermain replacements ($750,000) i continuing the replacement of downtown pedestrian lights ($250,000) / the construction of a new library building ($4,000,000) initial funding to provide design and feasibility studies for a municipal golf course ($4,000,000) initial funding to provide design work for an intermodai transportation facility ($8,298,000) CONCLUSION The preparation of a six -year capital facility plan serves as an excellent guide for future planning. While the 3MA is driving the preparation of the plan, many other purposes are also served. The CFP allows policy makers to view the current and future capital needs of each department. It structures decision making of local `level of service' standards and provides a mechanism to assess the financial ramifications of adopted level of service standards. The CFP also provides a means to assess the financial consequences of funding or not funding specific projects. Finally the 1995 -2000 Capital Facilities Plan will serve as the basis for the 1995 Capital Budget which the City Council authorized last Spring. Separating the Capital Budget from the Operating Budget should provide a clearer picture of the financial consequences of policy decisions and/or public demands for facilities and services. At a time when revenues to the City are growing slowly if at all and demands for services continue to mount it is critical that responsible officials at all levels be aware of the costs associated with new facilities and services. Respectfully submitted, Bob Titus CFP Committee Chairman 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, approving the 1995 -2000 Capital Facilities Plan. WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act of 1990 (GMA) requires the City to develop a comprehensive plan, which contains land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, public facilities, and transportation elements; and WHEREAS, the Capital Facilities Plan is the part of the comprehensive plan that communicates the City's capital construction projects and purchases for a six -year period as required by the GMA; and WHEREAS, on June 28, 1994, the City Council adopted a new Comprehensive Plan, which included a Capital Facilities Plan for 1994 -1999, in compliance with the GMA; and WHEREAS, a seven - member Capital Facilities Plan Committee has reviewed capital projects submitted by City departments, has solicited public comments at two public meetings, and has submitted its recommendation for the 1995 -2000 CFP; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the committee's recommendation and has conducted its own public hearing and held a work session to consider the 1995 -2000 CFP; and WHEREAS, in order to comply with the City's budget requirements as set forth in Chapter 35A.33 RCW, it is anticipated that the 1995 portion of the 1995 -2000 CFP will be adopted by ordinance as part of the 1995 budget process; and WHEREAS, it is further anticipated that the 1995 -2000 CFP will be adopted by ordinance as part of the first amendment to the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the GMA, which allows the Comprehensive Plan to be amended no more frequently than once every year NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles as follows: Section 1. The 1995 -2000 Capital Facilities Plan is hereby approved as the basis for the 1995 Capital 'udget; provided that the 1995 -2000 CFP will not be formally adopted for budgeting purposes until it is opted by ordinance as part of the 1995 budgeting process, and will not be formally adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan until adopted by ordinance amending the capital facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan. Passed by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the _ day of , 1994. ATTEST: Becky J. Upton, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney MAYOR 4 DEBT POLICY The City's Tong -term debt policies are contained within the following eight statements: 1) The City will confine long -term borrowing to capital improvements that cannot be financed from current revenues. 2) Acceptable uses of bond proceeds will include items which can be capitalized and depreciated. Refunding bond issues designated to restructure currently outstanding debt will be an acceptable use of bond proceeds. 3) Where possible, the City will use special assessment revenue, or other self- supporting bonds instead of general obligation bonds. 4) The City will not use long -term debt for current operations. 5) The City will maintain communications with bond rating agencies about its financial condition. The City will follow a policy of full disclosure on financial reports and bond prospectus. 6) General Obligation Bond Policies: • Projects proposed for financing through general obligation debt will be accompanied by an analysis of the future operating and maintenance costs associated with the projects. • Bonds will not be issued for a longer maturity schedule than a conservative estimate of the useful life of the asset to be financed. 7) Limited Tax General Obligation Bond Policies: • As a precondition to the issuance of limited tax general obligation bonds, altemative methods of financing will be exhausted. • Limited tax general obligation bonds will be issued under certain conditions: A project in progress requires moneys not available from altemative sources; Matching fund moneys are available which may be lost if not applied for in a timely manner; or Catastrophic or emergency conditions exist. 8) Financing of Lease Purchases: • Under RCW 39.36.020(2), the public may vote to approve bond issues for general govemment purposes in an amount not to exceed 2.5% of assessed valuation. Within the 2.5% limit, the City Council may approve bond issues up to .75% and lease purchases up to 1.5% of the City's total assessed value. (RCW 39.36.020(2) and RCW 35.42.200.) The 1.5% which the City Council may approve for leases overlaps the Council's .75% capacity for general obligation bonds. Because of this overlap, the Council should limit the amount which may be approved for financing lease purchases to .75% of the City's total assessed value in order to allow for the full .75% of bonded indebtedness without a public vote. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction atilt Letter of Transmittal 1 Resolution of Adoption 4 Debt Policy 5 Schedules & Summaries 1995 -2000 CFP Summary of Expenditures 6 1995 -2000 CFP Summary of Funding Sources 7 Long -Term Outstanding Debt Summary 8 Bonded Debt Margin Summary, January 1, 1995 10 General Purpose Program /Project information General Purpose Program Analysis 11 General Purpose Program Project Map 11 General Purpose Program Project Descriptions 13 Transportation Program /Project Information Transportation Program Analysis 20 Transportation Program Project Map 21 Transportation Program Project Descriptions 22 Enterprise Proaram /Project information Enterprise Program Analysis 32 Enterprise Program Project Map 33 Enterprise Program Project Descriptions 34 Appendix Master Project List & Funding Sources 58 Unfunded Project Descriptions 63 Capital Facilities Plan Summary Of Expenditures 01 Of A O Of 01 P. Of A CO 0) 01 r 117 as Of r 15 0 2 a 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 v O a ea _ q o CO N N r N 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N O 0 0 0 N N N N O N 0 0 N 0 0 O O 10 'et N N N 0 0 N 0 O O N Q H N N O 0 O 1. O eh 1n 4.4 N O O O O 01 N N O O O O t0 O N N N 0 N 0 CO 0 N 0 N N O O 0 ed. N N ti N M N N 0 0 0 0 O O M O O tV 1A tit 0 0 q M O a O to r tp M N N N N N O 0 N 0 10 0 0 0 0 N O N O N N O O q CO 0 N tO0 on 10 0 N w 1ff -O to Of r co_ M M N N ri N N N 0 t* 0 V' 0 0 41 0 O P: 10 N O O O N 100 O P• iO" N N w N N N M as to co C E C m 0 w+ L E 10 O ;? Eoay 0 c m E Q E: m � m 0.2 = ° E- c E 2 y m=afEc a_117,-) or,oE0a C_�15 c 22 cc0� 0 as re c, ad o.6 Toe r0 N to L m o w fJ re V a N m (7 O. v m E °' E I m ie = m m E 0a.iia.C9 c :°. >a1- C7 F- 1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �•r4' o re 4.11-4.1- 101004.11- 4,1 '417- .07 N 44 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O O O e to /7 P. P. N N N 00000 0 0 0 0 0 M M O 10 O 0 P. gt N M CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 O IA O O 10 Of . N P^ N N N N N O O O Of CO 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 O O O O 14 000 Of O O so Of N WI N N-N „N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 co OOf ti COO P. M tO N CO N N N N N O O O CI N9 O 1 N 0 0 0 0 0 000041 0 0 O 0 O Oa t0 0 co N N 10 Plo r r N N N N N O O O 14) r t'7 r M O O O O CO N CO N O O 1H /+f O 4.) N R 0) ra 0 m a i o f ; i0 ; a '1 `CI jr) Z.a a 3 o W V g N H O O O r O N N • 10 0 e W CO 10— TOTAL PROGRAM t0 d 1 O co u. 1t.. O E E cn EC N 0 .0 u. Q V O O O N Ot 01 CO O1 0) r ti 01 W t0 01 to Funding Source O4a mi. 000000 O O1 Q o0 O O O N O ti Y! x 0 0 0 01 O t0 co M t0 O co 1t! r 4! O 0 0 1 O O O N N M N O N O 47 ti 0f Q trf y N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N O O 00 4! 11) N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNN VC 40 CO els 0 0 N N 40 r r O M N N ., N O N 0 0 t0 t0 O 0 0 0 N O Of et V O O N tO O W. O1 40 4f 0 10 t0 r 44. r 0 0 0 tel 40 40 P. O CO N N r N 1- 01 N NN NM O O 00 T N co co t0 t0 r 0 0 0 ger N O 0) LO t0 0 0 0 0 0 M 4 0 0 0 CO. N 0 CO t0 t7 t'f O N ti CO CO N N 0 O N NNN N O 0 if N N N N 0 O 1- 0 t0 O M O t0 M O O1 O O O tO O to 4) N 44t O O O O O N. CA r 4) O O 4! 00)0 0(0001- 0)1-' 01 r 41 O N AP N N X' N N 40 r IA N N , r N y t0 10 N N U3 N N 1- N M 0 0 d 0 m 0 To 1— 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O N O CO O At O CI CO 0 0 4r.c ti O t0 P7 N O r co el 4! CO N ti O O N T r N (0 Q t+1 01 0 y N N r N N r 0; N N r N N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N 00 00 y N N N N N O O O 1- 01 P1 t0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N O O O N O tr ef O N N 0 t'9 N M O N N 0 0 0 O O1 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N O r r 0 01 y 0 o In to co N N CO M O te N M O O O 0 t0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Orr CO O. O O O1 N O 0 r N CO N t13 N N N N M M 0 0 O O 1• 4! 1- N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M N tO 0 0 CO 0 4 X' N O T t? 4f r T t0 O1 t0 t0 0) t+/ r N 447 1- M N 4* N N N 0 O 0 N1 t0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N e O N 44t N N r O N to 0 ri 0 0 r N - 00 M N 4. y N O r r r M N 0 O O O 4! O r N 0 O 0 1- 01 N t9 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O tO O O O tO ger 0 0 • r 01 t7 O ggi N t7 t: ✓ el 1%. 10 T tD O r O1 O1 4! r r r CO CO CO. CO N to tO r 1` r r 0 N N N N N N N N N X' O 0 0 0 V t0 CO 10 00 00 N M 10 N N ti N 0 V' NN r N N (00000(D0 O O N NIt1 N N t~0 CD N M N N ar N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 CO. O O T O O r to as '0' O to O N O1 N N e 0) N N N N N 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 CO N t0 O O O t0 ', O co O O aD to ti 01 O 10 r r M M O N O N N N N 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 N O 000000 • O O sr; co t'9 ger Nr CO 40 A tO tr1 CO M CO N CO CO N N N N N N N 00000000 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 CO. O r r 4) 1- co' 03 CA N 1- 0 O7 r t0 O 1° r tO N 0 r r r, N N r N N N N N 0 C 0 0 .5 • C L 0 • m.. -S4. OU' Al Ca 4.4. re ▪ m ° a• " 4 m (° , Z a .0 O O Z a 0 " 0 O AA _ • J w • 0 to 0 • ea as 0 c N N ids es V N Long- Term 'Outsta..Jing Debt Summary O O O CO O) Of O OI CO Of 0) 10 Of O) ProJectlPurchase 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P. 0 P) to o P! 0 1. P) 0 0 ti- 0 N 0 0 0 0 O O 441/4001,0001111,400344404000..0441004410004040 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD CO eA 01 O CO CV Q 0 0 r 40 O VI 0 CD M 0 0 40 40 0 O O O O lls O Cf N t0 m Of O I- N N in O N co 10 Pf v t0 Pf P4 O t0 f0 O N r < r t0 !. 0 N Mr 0 P! t0 10 CO .4. el CO N 0 0 CO 10 O 0 S O N O at in N.. N 40 N M N N N N N N N~ N N N ~ N N N N N 40 40 r N e7 N N N r N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 01 (1 N Co O CO ti N IA N CO .0 r P1 N r N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40000000 000000 NO1ei01OO O 40 Of 40 ti 0 10 00 10 Pf Of CO r N r rf N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mf O 1Cf 1A O O O CO Of f• CD 141P N 0 C7f r: t0 'f r CO r r rf Pf N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O_ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co. O O 16 O 1Cf O N m 0 Ps C1 N O en co tD ti N Pf 0 N P4 r r Pf e N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 VC O O O P. 10 el O O O r CO CO tO to N tV r r r P1 M N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1. Pf N ti Pf Co Pf 0 P. 40 0 0 CO 0 0 0 Pf Pf Pf O N N N 0 O 0 tD Pf 10 40 VI O 1. 0 14 ►. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pf Ps Pf N 0 0 0 0 r t0 m r 0 Pf 0 Pf at 00000 0 Pf Pf Pf O N N t0 O) O) m P. 0 1!f b m O Co 0 O m m ea Pf r r in N N ID ^ 40 CS N N P) Is ID 0 Q g O N O 10 Of M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 of f. 49 CO A 0 0 0 0 CO 0 P. 0 el P. 0 P. 0 0 O N N N 0 0 0 A OP 41 h 44 0 Co O to en 0 ID 0 Pf 10 0 CO 0 0 N O et N r en P) Co O t0 10 0 10 VI O CO 0 PI CO 0 i0 0 O r h P Pi a 44 P CO CA r t� of N h t0 N Pf 10 co C0 cm O r r off N N P. m f. 4111P P. 40 Pf Co Co r h 41.. r N r 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N~ N N N M M N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1. O rf 1. 0 Pf 0 1. Pf 0 0 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 0 Co CO D er t0 co m O A as O P7 O CO Pf 0 0 N N N 0 CO. 'C N O O m 0) N Of 0 A r 0 Pf O Co Pf O O r 4- tp N H m 0) CO COO 10 COD a CO O 00) P1 ei 1041 e M POf N N N N N N N N N N N N N 44 N M M N N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 P. VD P. P. Ps O el 0 P. 01 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O N N N 0 0 0 Co P. CO N /• O Of 0 Co IA 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N O N CO P1 P. at CO m m N O -0 O O -O 0 0 0 C0 . A CO m Ps A co' O O 0 O O O O r r tO N N m 0 10 P. 0 10 01 r 40 40 Itf III N N N N N N ~ N M N N N N N N PI N 0) co em 0 0 O P1 ti Pf r/ !. 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 P) N P. 0 0 0 Of CO VI r CO 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N tD < 0 CD CO et 0) rs CO 1• CO 0 N Of O Of 4 Qf N 0f O Pf r CO O qr O CO N Co r r f` N PI O r Of Of r 0 0 N NNNNNNNr N r N Pf 4011. v.. N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11. CO CI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 4* N 0 1• 1• "0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N 40 0 0 0 0 444. t0 -0 0 0 t0 N 0 CO A 0 t7 Iff 1p O - -O pi co' ea r co r pi O O r1 m r N P. Pf VS O.- N 41:4 N Of M N N N r r N N N 44 44 M N N 0 N O A T M . 37.568.755 $ . .466 2 a. o m m _ c g o co E A c c i o R m E c E E a . E E Ecce ` m 4- o c c 0 m m E d o 0 h In c a t f m ci c 13) c m $ c '2 ' ° mm m om m c v u �E > v Te Q s. m« c m A 03 00. o E c c o m C c 02m. — m a m m 0 c m - O V W. O d c` Cie it C ,Y �C ` I. Q CI Y p m N m C= 4 7 o Z d C~ m H 0'4 ��Z 1° ErE o �° «..N.v d aacet•ul4- ,0 ` °'ri ay. 0 co m m o p aNY c A�� °' o o c � a y m A l m a 8 me 'N�t -�o o �A Am1�v�e o�:1,3 ��..=a,OrJ3.��► 3�aa d o t CO € C) c o tmi a c a o 3 m 0 y 4411 m a E m z c 10 10 0 0 c Oz'41c)O!w .00 cE'o cmz6mm.. om� lmoEmESZ$2$ c y to v a m �' R a ;0eo0fi =J C9 �Qd =fTC)Semme si.<re Z33i-0C»C)lommoso E r,03.- N N I0 h CO a• Of 0 4. 0 r) Pf O 0 411. a 10 1O WS 10 0 CO 10 CO CO P. f. CO CO O 4g 1. Of 01 Of CO Of 01 411 CO Of 01 Of Of O) 01 Os O) O O) O) O) O) 0) Of as Of Of CO Of Of as Of O 01 at at as co as Of O 01 0) Of 0) 01 Of Of O) Of O) CO Of Of Of Of Of Of CO 0) Of Of Of O) Of 0) 0 4 'Voted Bond Issues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0.0..q0.0.0.0. oO 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O *0 N N M N M O C4 tO N Pf N 44 N 1: 4 40 N M N M N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 00000000 o 0 0 O N O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N CD 4) 10 N CO. N M N .� N*0 *O N N N N N N e► M N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 00.0 0 0 0 0 O 47 O O O O Cl O O O O O O 4) r 4) O CO 0 0 CO 0 10 0 0 0 47.44.?, O CO O at CO 1s PI 0 0 • CO N co NNN N N.a 41 4 N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O N 0 N 0 0 0 N 0 N N 0 000000 O 4! 0 0 11! 0 0 0 O CO 0 0 i0 CO 0 m 0 0 (0 02 N r. Is I f l O gr er N N O P9 Is N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 N 0 0 0 N 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 10 0 N 1ff N O e0'1 4▪ 0 N 9 A 0 N A N N I O N N W in M N 40 N M N M N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O N 00 N 00 00 O N 00 N N N 000000 1q to 10 111 0 0 0 0 N � ti p" • te *0 O 0f 0 4 N N N Of e•1 ■ N N N 44 N N N M N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 N N N V► N N O O O O O 0 t7 0 N h O *0 tri. O N N O.4r CO Q .4 CO O N on co N O N N . - PfNNO 0 N N N N N N N Total Revenue Bonds 00 O O N O O N O O O 0 0 0 01 0 0 10 0 ti 0 r r OM. 47 40 t0 N •N CD *0 P1 en M N N O N r N O O O Of O O CO O P O N O to r O O 4f O N CO 1- 10 N N N N ^ N N 0 0 Co Of 0 0 0 0 Is 0 e� O O 1C O t0 (0 CO .4- O 4! t0 0 CO 1- 4* M CO N 0 000010 0 en O t0 O 3 01 40 O 4f N N M O N N N 0 0 O co O 4! O O O t0_r .rte N 1s CO t'f on M N N qr. N N N o comma 0 a0� to O to O Is N CC O • 40 Is N 4! M N M N 1N N N N N 0 000010 0 0 CO 0 Is 0 O 1• O 9. O 44.• t0 N O 0 01 CD t0 CO t11 O 1! N h 0) h N N N N r N N vement Bonds A 1 J 0 - a 01 p- at 0 t- ai N 01 01 O 0) t0 O1 PY N 01 r *0 N t0 Of M O1 1: t0 ea Total Public Works Trust Fund Loans Bonded Debt Margin Summary $810,360,716 $818,464,323 $826,648,966 $834,915,456 $843,264,611 $851,697,257 $860,214,229 Assessed Valuation (1) in O 100 P7 O N ui O co 0 in es T 10 ti N N N N co O co N I4 T 0) T T N ' )- N N 4* N 10 O r 00 N co N co N c O V CD -- CS CI es COD CO 0 N fin 4n. O c0 N CO M_ N eh 0 fJ0 0 as 0) N eh N N in t'9 M I0 N co o to in o c0_ oo_ 0 0 V DI CO N N N N 44 - N T O *0 O O t. CO ID co N !s 00 N N N N Legal Limit - Total @ 2.5% Projected Voted Debt Projected Non -Voted Debt Total Debt Subject to Debt Limitation eh 0 O 0 0 fD N to u) u7 10 N N N 0) to N N eo 4* M CD ID CS CD iD 1 N Available Margin - Total Debt (1) Assumes a 1% annual increase Qrn.N E 7 1 r _ N 0 To C fn C 7 ■ C O in -> 7 O N 4) 4) -- -- c,-af-_: - -- "0 r O > N 'a ca N E y a� .' N O. o 7 5 f0 co C N >N 0. CO ) -0 E- >V° C 'V C `. 4) > C �_ 0. L O 3 �,w o U >. o 0 ° a !'' 4) CL V d _ 0 tf• L. > rs 2 4) 0 p "5 O 4) L r 0) U 0 r 0 t0 al Q) CD > = '0 >+ 0 0 s co° co Q . E ;c c c.) c 2o �cs • o0 7 N d C am To w cn 4) > > w L O C .- r N - U y ' '— a) o a) co cc) a co c`no a M C C M N ft 0) t0 `) O A ch V cr > O U 0 _'cc U '0 c .� p E O O �' mu) C 0 -0 o O C C u? to co > .0 = N co c O 0 4) a) L 0 4) c`0 4) L cn co fn • ti CD -0 a) c •oo o ,a a 'c 7 E o r 4) r � C 4) 0Ei C. c0 N • 12 C fa CO CD 0 7 .0 C a) a) 7 > c a) CC j fn O - � CD O as 4) CD 3 c o 0) V7 co 4) 0 C .78 cl a) � 0 0) c. f1 O o a N C a) '4— E > fo co 0- 0 a) 4) 0) O C f0 0 f0 U a) L ta 0 a) 0) c O 0 -a N _ - 0) 0 00) as N J_ co 0 N C 4) 4) 0 0. E T 0 0 cn 0 C 0 c a) N N a) 0) N f0 f0 0 a) a 1 General Purpose The General Purpose element of the Capital Facilities Plan comprise Police , Fire, Parks & Recreation, and General Govemment programs. Combined they represent 28.7% of the $64,652,400 Capital Facilities Plan. Funding for the various projects will come from a variety of sources. A total of $1,058,480 will come from City Funds; $400.000 from Surplus Bond Funas, $184,796 from General Fund Reserves, $158,544 from Inter -Fund Transfers, and $315,140 from Utility Taxes from the two new utilities. The remaining $17,499,920 will come from Outside Funds; $9,293,000 from Public/Private Contributions, $4,000,000 from Greens Fees (new Golf Course), $3,500,000 from Voted Bonds, and $706,920 from State — Federal Federal Grants. Enterprise 32:0% General - _ _ - -- - 28.7% Transportation 39.3% - Police Fire . v0%_ 0.5% Parks & Recreation 50.8% General Govemment 48.7% CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROGRAM AMOUNT General Purpose $18,558,400 Transportation $25,397,000 Enterprise $20,697,000 TOTAL CAPITAL PROGRAM $64,652,400 11 CL 0 CL (/) 0 0- CC 0 —J CC LLI z LiJ 0 tomma,.■ :ft LBUDJ6 is atLaWla I L., run el: : .6$ I 'r ...11■•■; •■• ." / / / / r. WM..' I If 1 MI 3. adaisara Ss =CUM 7.4 1 Communications Center Relocation Project #: PO -04 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This project will provide for the relocation of the PENCOM Communications Center from the first floor of the Police Department to the presently unfinished second floor. Impact to Property Taxes: none Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $250,000 Total $250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $250,000 Total $250.000 Yearly. Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 - 1998 Expenses 1999 2000 Total $250,000 Pool Enhancement/Repair Project #: PK -15 Project Description- _ _ This project provides for renovation of the locker rooms, replacement of the circulation/chlorine system, the addition of a hydrotherapy area, and repairs to the north wail of the existing building. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.044/$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $30,000 $370,000 Total $400,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $400,000 $400.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 xpenses $400,000 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total $400,000 13 Park ADA Compliance Project #: PK -21 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This project provides funding to bring all Park facilities into ADA compliance; including restrooms, playgrounds, buildings, etc. The major portion of the funding occuring in 1996 and 1997 is for Hollywood Beach. The Hollywood Beach portion of this project will be funded by a grant and matching in -kind services. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.0741$1.000 Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $160,000 Total $160,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $100,000 $60,000 Total $160,000 arty Financial Summa Waterfront Trail Project #: PK -22 Project Description This project provides for the continuation of the waterfront trail from Francis Street to Rayonier. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.0121$1.000 Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $56,000 Total $56,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $46,000 $10.000 $56,000 iy Financial Summa 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $40.000 $60.000 $60.000 $160,000 Waterfront Trail Project #: PK -22 Project Description This project provides for the continuation of the waterfront trail from Francis Street to Rayonier. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.0121$1.000 Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $56,000 Total $56,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $46,000 $10.000 $56,000 iy Financial Summa 14 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $56.000 $56,000 14 Fire Hose Replacement Project #: FR -23 Project Description This project will provide for replacement of the existing 2-1/2" and 3" supply hose lines with new larger diameter 4" or 5" hose. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.043/$1,000 Estimated Project Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other Costs $35.000 $35,000 Estimated Project Funding. Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $35,000 $35,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $35,000 Total $35,000 Telephone System Project #: GG -29 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This project will replace the existing telephone system at City Hall. Impact to Utility Rates: Impact to Property Taxes: $2.14 /customer/yr $0.025/$1,000/yr Pre- Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $210,000 $210.000 Estimated Project Funding Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $200,000 $10,000 $210,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $10.000 $200,000 Total $210.000 15 VBMCC Parking Project #: GG-44 Project Description This project provides for an expansion of the City Hall Nem Burton parking lot to the south. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.0621$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $50,000 Total $50,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $50,000 Total $50,000 ma New PA Branch Library Project #: GG-45 Project Description This project provides for a new 25,000 sq. ft. Port Angeles Library on land the Library owns. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.385/$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $500,000 $3,500,000 Total $4,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $500,000 $3,500,000 Total $4,000,000 1995 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $2,000.000 $50,000 $4,000,000 $50,000 New PA Branch Library Project #: GG-45 Project Description This project provides for a new 25,000 sq. ft. Port Angeles Library on land the Library owns. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.385/$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $500,000 $3,500,000 Total $4,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $500,000 $3,500,000 Total $4,000,000 16 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $2,000.000 $2,000.000 $4,000,000 16 Golf Course /Rec. Complex Project #: PK-62 Project Description This project provides for a municipal golf course and recreation complex (priority softball fields), possibly located on Port property adjacent to the airport. The whole project will only proceed '+flowing a market/feasibility study to determine revenue potential. Impact to Property Taxes: none Pre-C Lan Con Other Estimated Project Costs Pre-Construction $200,000 Land/Right-of-Way $300,000 Construction $3,500,000 Total $4.000,000 Estimated Project Funding- Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $4,000,000 $4.000,000 Yearly Financial .Summary 1995 1996 Expenses $50,000 $2.000,000 1997 $1,950,000 1998 1999 2000 Total $4.000.000 Marine Lab Expansion Project #: GG-63 Project Description Estimated Project Costs To increase the educational and research value of the Arthur D. Feiro Marine Lab and to enhance tourism in Port Angeles. The Marine Lab is the hub of the Port Angeles Waterfront Trail and could be the orientation center for tourists in the North Olympic Peninsula through direction to other areas and education about those areas. The 3,000 square foot lab is presently used to its total cape city. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.0051$1,000 Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Con Other $50,000 $8,000,000 r $730.000 $8.780,000 Estimated Project Funding Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $8,776,000 Total $4,000 $8,780.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 xpenses $12.500 1997 1 1998 $4,767,500 $4.000.000 1999 2000 Total $8.780.000 17 Waterfront Trail Lighting Project #: PK - 75 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This project provides for the installation of lighting along the waterfront trail. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.005/$1,000tyr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $241,000 Total $241,000 Estimated Project Funding- Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $192,800 $43,912 $4,288 $241,000 Yearly Financial Summary Expenses 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 $48.200 Waterfront Trail IV $48.200 $48,200 $48,200 Total $192,800 Project #: PK - 76 Project Description- This project will extend the trail from Morse Creek to the West side of Rayonier. Impact to Street Rates: Impact to Property Taxes: $0.77lcustomer /yr $0.011!$1,000 Estimated Project Costs Pre-Construction $16,245 Right -of -Way $81,300 $417,055 Land/ Construction Other Total $514,600 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $411,680 $93,764 $9,156 $514,600 18 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $97,545 $417,055 $514,600 18 Civic Field Enhancements Project #: PK - 77 Project Description This project provides for the installation of additional seating, upgrading and additions to the lighting system, and concrete repairs. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.023/$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $100,000 Total $100,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds $100,000 Appropriations Total $100,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 Expenses - $100,000 1999 2000 Total $100,000 Warning Sirens Project #: FR - 79 • Project Description Estimated Project Costs This project will provide four sirens to be used to provide early waming to citizens in the event of a disaster. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.0741$1,000 Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $10,000 r $50.000 $60,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $60.000 $60,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $10,000 $25,000 $25.000 Total $60.000 19 Transportation The Transportation element of the Capital Facilities Plan comprise- ail vehicle and pedestrian transportation programs including roadways, bridges, alleys, sidewalks and traffic tighting/signats. Combined they represent 39.3% of the $64,552,400 Capital Facilities Plan. Funding for the various projects will come from a variety of sources. A total of $2,423,800 will come from City Funds; $200,100 from General Fund Reserves, $140,000 from ISTEA Funds, $137,400 from Real Estate Excise Taxes, $60.000 from Inter -Fund Transfers, and $1,886.300 from Street Utility Rates. The remaining $22,973,200 will come from Outside Funds; $12,372,020 from Public/Private Contributions, $1,600,000 from -' "Ited Bonds, and $9,001,180 from State & Federal Grants. Note: All project costs are in 1994 dollars. Rate impacts are based on 1994 property valuations and utility customer counts. General Transportation Purpose = : _ —_ _-39.3% 28.7% Enterprise 32.0% Vehicles 98.2% CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROGRAM AMOUNT General Purpose $18,558,400 Transportation $25,397,000 Enterprise $20,697,000 TOTAL .CAPITAL PROGRAM $64,652,400 20 Ediz Hook Nourishment Project #: TR -09 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Maintenance and repair of riprap for hook by corps of engineers. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.088/$1,000 Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other Total $650,000 $650,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $579,000 $71,000 $650,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 Expenses $650,000 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 8th Street Bridges Repair Total $650,000 Project #: TR -11 Project Description This project is a maintenance type project to the existing bridges that requires extensive structural replacement on an annual basis in order to preserve the life of the bridges. Note: First year funding is from Street Fund reserves. Impact to Street Rates: $4.21 /customer/yr Impact to Property Taxes: $0.062/customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $150,000 $150,000 Total $300,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $300,000 _ $300,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 _xpenses $50,000 $50.000 $50.000 $50,000 $50,000 22 2000 Total $50.000 $30,000 #.3t ,poc! 1 8th Street Bridges Replacement Study Project #: TR -30 Project Description Begin engineering studies to replace bridges. Project extends beyond plan period. Impact to Street Rates $1.12lcustomer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $150,000 Total $150,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $150,000 Total $150,000 Financial Summa Lauridsen Blvd /Airport Road Realignment Project #: TR-40 Project Description This project is a realignment project of Lauridsen Blvd, Airport Road and Edgewood Drive. It is a multi - agency project funded by the City, Port, County and Transportation Improvement Board. Impact to RE Excise Tax: 20.1 % /yr Estimated Project Costs $90,000 $350,000 $865,000 Pre-Construction Land/Right-of-Way Construction $1,305,000 Estimated Project Funding Transfer $204,000 Revenue $1,101,000 Total Fund Outside Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $1,305,000 Financial Summa 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total xpenses $679,000 $200,000 , $150,000 $150,000 Lauridsen Blvd /Airport Road Realignment Project #: TR-40 Project Description This project is a realignment project of Lauridsen Blvd, Airport Road and Edgewood Drive. It is a multi - agency project funded by the City, Port, County and Transportation Improvement Board. Impact to RE Excise Tax: 20.1 % /yr Estimated Project Costs $90,000 $350,000 $865,000 Pre-Construction Land/Right-of-Way Construction $1,305,000 Estimated Project Funding Transfer $204,000 Revenue $1,101,000 Total Fund Outside Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $1,305,000 Financial Summa 23 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses ' $679,000 $200,000 $879,000 23 Commercial Alley Reconstruction Project #: TR -41 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Rehabilitate alleys in downtown and other commercial areas. Impact to Street Rates: $4.21 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $250,000 Total $250,000 Estimated Project Funding;- Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $250,000 $250,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Total $250,000 Lauridsen Blvd Bridge Widening Project #: TR-42 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Widen bridge to allow use by trucks and buses. Impact to Street Rates: $0.63 /customer /yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $75,000 $345,000 Total $420.000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $336,000 $84,000 Total $420,000 Yearly Financial. Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $420.000 Total $420,000 24 1 Replace Downtown Pedestrian Lighting Project #: TR-43 Project Description Replace one hundred eighteen (118) downtown pedestrian light standards. Impact to Street Rates: Impact to Property Taxes: $0.0081$1,000/yr $0.57 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $250,000 Total $250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $35,400 $214,600 Total $250.000 al Summa Intermodal Transportation Facility Project #: TR-48 Project Description Construct multi -modal terminat for ferries, transit. and other forms of transportation in the downtown area. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.1761$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $298,000 $8,000,000 Total $8,298,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $6,698,000 $1,600,000 Total $8.298.000 1 Summa 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $40.000 $40,000 -. $40,000 $40,000 $160,000 Intermodal Transportation Facility Project #: TR-48 Project Description Construct multi -modal terminat for ferries, transit. and other forms of transportation in the downtown area. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.1761$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $298,000 $8,000,000 Total $8,298,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $6,698,000 $1,600,000 Total $8.298.000 1 Summa 25 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $148,000 $150,000 , $8.000,000 $8.298,000 25 5th Street Reconstruction Project #: TR-60 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Reconstruct 5th street (Lincoln St. - Ennis St.) with curb, gutter and sidewaiks and signal at 5th and Race intersection. Impact to Street Rates: $0.22/customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other 5100,000 $770,000 Total 5870,000 Estimated Project Funding-. Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations 5840,000 530,000 Total $870.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 Expenses 5100,000 1998 $770,000 1999 2000 Total 5870,000 8th Street Reconstruction Project #: TR-61 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Reconstruct from Cherry to Race removing asphalt and overlaying roadway. Impact to Street Rates: $5.24 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other 580,000 5620,000 Total 5700,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations 5700,000 Total $700.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses 580,000 5620,000 Total 5700,000 26 Lapier LID Project #: TR-66 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Construct utility and street improvements via LID for an area which Pre - Construction $100,000 was a condition of annexation to the City. Land/Right -of -Way Construction 5900,000 Other Total 51,000,000 Estimated Project Funding: LID - No Cost to City Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Yearly Financial Summary "C" Street and Fairmont LID Project #: TR-67 Project Description Project provides storm drainage, roadways and sidewalks undeveloped (facilities) area. LID - No Cost to City Expenses 1995 for Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other Total $100,000 53,900,000 $4,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total 54,000,000 $4,000,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1996 1997 1998 1 1999 j 2000 Total 1 54,000,0001 54.000,000 27 "0" Street LID Project #: TR-68 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Provide street improvements to "O" street north of 18th street. LID - No Cost to City Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $50,000 $450,000 Total $500,000 Estimated Project Funding-... Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $500,000 Total $500,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $500,000 Total $500,000 Rhoads Road Area UD Project #: TR-69 Project Description Estimated Project Costs- Construct roadway, drainage and utilities. LID - No Cost to City Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $80,000 $1,920,000 Total $2,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $2,000,000 Total $2.000,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 :xpenses $2.000,000 28 Total $2,000,000 Mt Angeles /Porter Street LID Project #: TR -70 Project Description Construct roadway, storm drainage and other utilities. LID - No Cost to City Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $100,000 $3,900,000 Total $4,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $4,000,000 Total $4.000.000 Financial Summa 10th/13th and "I/M" LID Project #: TR -71 Project Description Provide utilities. storm drainage and roadway improvements by LID. LID - No Cost to City Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $75,000 $425,000 Total $500,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $500,000 Total $500,000 Summa 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $500.000 $4,000,000 _ $4,000,000 10th/13th and "I/M" LID Project #: TR -71 Project Description Provide utilities. storm drainage and roadway improvements by LID. LID - No Cost to City Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $75,000 $425,000 Total $500,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $500,000 Total $500,000 Summa 29 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $500.000 _ $500.000 29 17th Street Utilities and Street Improvements Project #: TR -73 Project Description Provide utility extension and street improvements to city owned property. Impact to Utility Rates: none Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $20,000 $150,000 Total $170,000 Estimated Project Funding, Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $170,000 Total $170,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $170,000 Total $170,000 New Sidewalk Program Project #: TR - 74 Project Description This project is to construct new sidewaiks on arterials with priority given to school walking routes. Note: First year funding is from Street Fund Reserves. Impact to Street Rates: $4.21 /customer/yr Impact to Property Taxes: $0.074/$1,000 Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $300,000 Total $300,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $240,000 $60.000 $300,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $60.000 $60,000 $60.000 $40.000 $40,000 $40,000 30 Total $300,000 Lauridsen Blvd/Washington St. Reconstruction Project Description This project will reconstruct the intersection at Lauridsen Blvd. and Washington Street to improve grades and sight distances. Impact to Street Rates: $0.94 /customer /yr Project #: TR - 80 Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction $40,000 Land/Right -of -Way Construction $210,000 Other Total $250.000 Estimated Project Funding_ Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $125,000 $125.000 $250.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 Expenses 1997 $250,000 , 1998 1999 Project #: 2000 Total $250,000 Project Description Expenses Estimated Project Costs Pre-Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other Total Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1 1997 1 1998 1999 31 1 2000 Total Enterprise The Enterprise element of the Capital Facilities Plan comprise City Light, Water. Wastewater, Solid Waste and Stormwater Utility programs. Combined they represent 32.0% of the $64,552,400 Capital Facilities Plan. Funding for the various projects will come from a variety of sources. A total of $17,884,600 will come from City Funds; $2,914,000 from Electric Rates, $6.531.600 from Water Rates, $3,179,000 from Wastewater Rates, $4,150,000 from Solid Waste Rates, and $1,110.000 from Stormwater Rates. The remaining $2,812,400 will come from Outside Funds; $1,802,400 from - -Public/Private Contributions, and $1,010,000 from State & Federal Grants. Note: All project costs are in 1994 dollars. Rate impacts are based on 1994 property valuations and utility customer counts. Transportation 39.3% General Purpose 28.7% Wastewater Solid Waste 19.4% 20.9% Water 36.9% Stormwater 5.3% City Light 17.5% CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROGRAM AMOUNT General Purpose $18,558,400 Transportation $25,397,000 Enterprise $20,697,000 TOTAL CAPITAL PROGRAM $64,652,400 32 | ENTERPRISE PROJECT MAP _^10••~ : ompost Facility Phase 2 Project #: WW -01 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Complete compost facility in compliance with air quality and FAA requirements. Impact to Wastewater Rates: $5.12/customer/yr Impact to Solid Waste Rates: $10.95 /customer /yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $60,000 $440,000 Total $500,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $250,000 $250,000 Total $500,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 Expenses $500.000 1999 2000 Total $500,000 Compost Loader /Mixer Project #: WW-02 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Purchase mixer to combine biosoiids and chipped yard waste for improved compost. Impact to Wastewater Rates: $1.95 /customer /yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $150,000 $150.000 Estimated Project Funding Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $150,000 $150,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 expenses $150,000 Total $150.000 34 1 Outfall Repair or Replacement Project #: WW-03 Project Description After a study of diffusion for outfall either repair outfall cap and diffusers or replace outfall. Impact to Wastewater Rates: $13.00 /customerlyr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $75,000 $925,000 Total $1,000,000 Estimated Project Funding: Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $1,000,000 $1,000.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $750.000 $250,000 Total $1,000,000 4 KV Upgrade Project #: CL-05 Project Description Increase our distribution voltage from 4,160 volts to 12.470 volts. This involves installing new insulators and replacing our older transformers. Impact to Electric Rates: $3.02Jcustomer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre-Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $810,000 Total $810,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $810,000 $810,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $450.000 $360,000 Total $810,000 35 Waterline Replacement Program Project #: WT -06 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Annual replacement of old watermains and watermain with history of failures or water quality problems. Impact to Water Rates: $18.21 /customer /yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $30,000 $770,000 Total $800,000 Estimated Project Funding- Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $800,000 $800.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 Expenses $100.000 1996 1, 1997 $100,000 $100,000 1998 1 1999 2000 $100,000 1 $200,000 $200,000 Total $800.000 Water System Corrosion Control Project #: WT -07 Project Description Develop corrosion control program and implement program to retard corrosion system wide to increase life of pipelines. Impact to Water Rates: $2.07 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $20,000 $150,000 Total $170,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $170,000 $170,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 ixpenses $20.000 1998 I 1999 $150,000 2000 Total $170,000 36 11 Purchase PUD Electrical Facilities Project #: CL -08 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Purchase electrical facilities from the Clallam County PUD that are located within the city limits of Port Angeles. The City and the PUD has signed an Electrical Service Agreement that requires City Light to provide electric service to all customers located within Port Angeles. This will avoid a duplication of electrical facilities and provides city services to city residences. Impact to Electric Rates: none Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $340,000 $340,000 Estimated Project Funding Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $340,000 $340,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $340.000 Total $340,000 Circuit Breaker Conversion Project #: CL -10 Project Description Upgrade four (4) high voltage circuit breakers at "A" Street substation by installing vacuum interrupters. The existing circuit breakers have air -blast interrupters with asbestos arc - chutes. Impact to Electric Rates: $0.48 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $50,000 Total $50,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $50,000 $50,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $50.000 Total $50.000 37 Francis Street Stormwater improvement Project #: WW-12 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Replace and modify undersized storm water facilities in Francis street basin to reduce flooding during storms and aid in reducing Francis street CSO flows. Impact to Wastewater Rates: $1.30 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $100,000 $850,000 Total $950,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $850,000 $100,000 Total $950,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $850,000 Total $850,000 CSO Monitoring Facilities Project #: WW-13 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Install permanent CSO monitoring devices to record overflows. Impact to Wastewater Rates: $1.04 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $120,000 Total $120.000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $120,000 $120,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 _xpenses $40.000 $40.000 Total $80.000 38 I Peabody Creek/Lincoin Street Culvert Rehabilitation Project #: DR -14 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Rehabilitate existing culvert for Peabody Creek under Lincoln street. Impact to Stormwater Rates: $4.27 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $40,000 $300,000 Total $340,000 Estimated Project Funding: Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $340,000 Total $340.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $340.000 Total $340.000 College Substation Upgrade Project #: CL -16 Project Description Upgrade College Substation to increase the distribution vottage from 4,160 volts to 12,470 volts. Purchase and install 15 MVA power transformer, circuit switcher. upgrade metal -clad switchgear, site improvements, etc. Impact to Electric Rates: $5.44 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land Other Construction $30,000 $530,000 r $6.000 $566,000 Estimated Project Funding • Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $566,000 $566.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $536.000 Total $536.000 39 Silvacuiture Facilities Project #: VWV 17 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Acquire ability to apply bio-solids on private property, including testing equipment. Impact to Wastewater Rates: $1.95 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $65.000 $150,000 $215,000 Estimated Project Funding Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $215,000 $215,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $150,000 Total $150,000 Construct Overhead Powerline Project #: CL -18 Project Description Construct overhead poweriine from College Substation to Lindberg /Golf Course Road. Improves reliability, increases Toad capacity to serve future customers east of Ennis Street and reduces loading on Washington Substation feeder 1203. Impact to Electric Rates: $1.06 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $25,000 $110,000 $135,000 Estimated Project Funding Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $135,000 $135,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 xpenses $110.000 Total $110,000 40 1 Silvacuiture Vehicle Project #: WW -19 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Acquire vehicle to spray bio-soiids on forest land. Impact to Wastewater Rates: $1.30 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $100,000 $100,000 Estimated Project Funding Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $100,000 Total $100,000 Yeariy Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $100,000 Total $100,000 Construct Golf Course Road Substation Project #: CL -20 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Construct new substation at Golf Course Road and Lindberg Road. Impact to Electric Rates: $2.95 /customertyr Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $65,000 $307,000 Total $372,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $372,000 Total $372,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $40,000 $17.000 $250,000 Total $307,000 41 _diz Hook Sewer Phase II Project #: VWV 24 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Construct remaining facilities such as pump station on the hook, modify Daishowa pump station to accept flows and remaining 3eiines. Impact to Wastewater Rates: 53.32/customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $50,000 $200,000 Total $250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $250,000 $250.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $250,000 Total $250,000 Sewer Pump Stations #1 and #3 Improvements Project #: WW-25 Project Description Eliminate Pump Station #1 with construction of gravity main and upgrade Pump Station #3 for additional capacity. Impact to Wastewater Rates: $7.63 /customer /yr Pre-C Other Estimated Project Costs $130,000 Pre-Construction Land/Right-of-Way Construction $70,000 $400,000 Total $600.000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $600,000 $600,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Expenses $600,000 42 2000 l Total $600.000 Downtown Watermain and Sidewalk Replacement Project #: WT -26 Project Description Replace old watermains in downtown area, including sidewalks. Impact to Water Rates: $9.14 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $50,000 $700,000 Total $750,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $750,000 Total $750,000 ancial Summa New high Zone Pump Station Project #: WT -27 Project Description Construct new pump station to provide increased fire flows and supply to upper zone and areas served by PUD. Impact to Water Rates: $1.88 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre-Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $75,000 $250,000 Total $325,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $182,000 $143,000 Total $325.000 ancial Summa l 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 i 2000 Total 1 $150,000 1 1 $Total Expenses Expe Ex enses 1 P $750,0001 New high Zone Pump Station Project #: WT -27 Project Description Construct new pump station to provide increased fire flows and supply to upper zone and areas served by PUD. Impact to Water Rates: $1.88 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre-Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $75,000 $250,000 Total $325,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $182,000 $143,000 Total $325.000 ancial Summa 43 1995 1996 1997 1998 I 1999 2000 Total $150,000 1 1 $ Ex enses 1 P $175,000 43 ewer Line Repair Misc. Project #: WW -28 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Repair various failing lines as found. Impact to Wastewater Rates: $5.85 /customer /yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $240,000 Total $240.000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $240.000 $240.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $40,000 $40,000 $40.000 $40,000 $40.000 $40,000 Total $240,000 Landfill Transfer Station Project #: SW-31 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Construct facility to Toad long haul vehicles and accept waste at landfill. Impact to Solid Waste Rates: $18.65 /customer /yr Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $150,000 $1,350,000 Total $1,500,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $1,500,000 Total $1.500.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 .xpenses $1.500.000 1998 1999 2000 Total $1,500.000 44 Landfill Cell #2 Extension Project #: SW -32 Project Description Extend Cell #2 to south and up sides of cell. Estimated Project Costs Impact to Solid Waste Rates: $3.42/customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $25,000 $250,000 Total $275,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $275,000 $275,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $275,000 Total $275,000 Motor Control Center Maintenance at Elwha intake Project #: WT -33 Project Description Upgrade Motor Control Center for Elwha pumps which are old and prone to failure. Impact to Water Rates: $0.73 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre- Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $60,000 Total $60,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $60,000 Total $60.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $60,000 Total $60,000 45 Emergency Electrical Equipment for Elwha Pumps Project #: WT -34 Project Description Repair /improve emergency electrical equipment and panel Elwha Pump Station. Equipment is outdated and subject to failu gmprove connections to emergency power suppiies. Impact to Water Rates: $0.97 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs at re. Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other 510,000 570,000 Total $80,000 Estimated Project Funding- Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total 580,000 $80,000 Yearly Financial Summary Expenses 1995 1996 $80.000 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total $80,000 Landfill Closure Project #: SW-35 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Close all active landfill cells and construct transfer facility. Impact to Solid Waste Rates: $55.90 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other 5150,000 $2,050,000 Total 52.200,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $2.200,000 $2.200.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $2.200.000 Total $2,200.000 46 11 Jones Street Reservoir Disinfection Project #: WT -36 Project Description Modify the method of disinfection by installation of hypochlonne system. Impact to Water Rates: $0.37 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $30,000 Total $30,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $30,000 $30.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $30,000 Total $30,000 Creek Outlet dredging Project #: DR -37 Project Description Remove siltation at mouths of creek culverts to improve stream flow. Impact to Stormwater Rates: $0.75 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $70,000 Total $70,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $10,000 $60,000 Total $70,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $70,000 , Total $70,000 47 T] 1 Francis Street Diversion Design and Construction Project #: WW -38 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Improve CSO manhole and ability for measuring flows required in NPDES permit. impact to Wastewater Rates: $4.13 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other 550,000 $268,000 Total 5318,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total 5318,000 5318,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 Expenses 5318.000 1999 2000 Total 5318,000 Upgrade "1" Street Substation Project #: CL -39 Project Description Replace existing 7.5 MVA power transformer at "1" Street Substation with a 12 MVA power transformer and circuit switcher. Impact to Electric Rates: $3.37 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other 5350,000 Total $350.000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $350,000 $350,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses 5350.000 Total $350,000 48 1 Southeast Reservoir Project #: WT-46 Project Description New reservoir for high system serves PUD system and city system east and south of city as well as current city services. Impact to Water Rates: $30.09 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $975,000 $2,275,000 Total $3,250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $780,000 $2,470,000 Total $3.250,000 umma Rehabilitate Mill Creek Pump Station Project #: WT-47 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Rebuild pumps and controls at Mill Creek Pump Station to improve reliability and extend life of equipment. Impact to Water Rates: $2.62/customer /yr Pre- Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $40,000 $175,000 Total $215,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $215,000 Total $215,000 mma 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $400,000 $2.850,000 1 $3,250,000 Rehabilitate Mill Creek Pump Station Project #: WT-47 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Rebuild pumps and controls at Mill Creek Pump Station to improve reliability and extend life of equipment. Impact to Water Rates: $2.62/customer /yr Pre- Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $40,000 $175,000 Total $215,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $215,000 Total $215,000 mma 49 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $215.000 $215.000 49 Campbell Avenue improvements Project #: WW-49 Project Description Provide utilities to support housing project in Porter - Mt Angeles area. Impact to Water Rates: $0.66 /customer/yr Impact to Wastewater Rates: $1.64 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $180,000 Total $180,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $180,000 $180,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $180.000 Total $180,000 SCADA Project #: CL -50 Project Description Install supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) in our substations. Impact to Electric Rates: $0.25 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $110,000 Total $110,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $110,000 $110,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total $71,000 Expenses $54.000 $17.000 50 "N" Street Stormwater Project #: DR -51 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Improve stormwater discharge pipe over bluff. Impact to Stormwater Rates: $1.26 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $10,000 $90,000 Total $100,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $100,000 $100.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $100,000 Total $100,000 Black Diamond Reservoir Disinfection Project #: WT -52 Project Description Modify the rnethod of disinfection by installation of hypochiorine system. Impact to Water Rates: $1.46 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $20,000 $100,000 Total $120,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropnations Total $120,000 $120,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $120.000 Total $120,000 51 10th Street Stormwater Discharge Project #: DR -53 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Improvement to storm discharge over bluff to the Straits. Impact to Stormwater Rates: $1.26 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $10,000 $90,000 Total $100.000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $100,000 $100,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 Expenses $100,000 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total $100,000 Jones Street Reservoir Cover Project #: WT -54 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Construct cover over reservoir for water supply protection. Impact to Water Rates: $2.44 /customer /yr Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $25,000 $175.000 $200.000 Estimated Project Funding Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $200,000 $200,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $200,000 Total $200,000 52 W Pipeline To New High Zone Reservoir Project #: T -55 Project Description Pipeline ties system to new reservoir in southeast area. Provides flow to reservoir. Impact to Water Rates: $5.42/customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $85,000 $500,000 Total $585,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $140,000 $445,000 Total $585.000 I . Financial Summa Spruce Street Fire Pump Project #: WT -56 Project Description Provide water booster pumping capacity to meet fire flow needs at Spruce and Fairmont area. Impact to Water Rates: $0.95 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction $10.000 Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $65,000 Total $75,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $75,000 $75,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $75.000 Total $75,000 53 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $85,000 $500,000 $585,000 Spruce Street Fire Pump Project #: WT -56 Project Description Provide water booster pumping capacity to meet fire flow needs at Spruce and Fairmont area. Impact to Water Rates: $0.95 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction $10.000 Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $65,000 Total $75,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $75,000 $75,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $75.000 Total $75,000 53 Elwha Station Disinfection Project #: WT -57 Project Description Estimated Project Costs Modify method of disinfection by installation of hypochiorine system. Impact to Water Rates: $2.13 /customer/yr Pre- Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $25,000 $150,000 Total $175,000 Estimated Project Funding- Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $175,000 Total $175,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $175,000 Peabody Heights Reservoir Disinfection Project #: WT -58 Total $175,000 Project Description Modify method of disinfection by installation of hypochlorine system. Impact to Water Rates: $1.46 / customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $10,000 $110,000 Total $120,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $120,000 Total Yearly Financial Summary- Expenses 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 $120.000 54 Total $120,000 11 Cover Black Diamond Reservoir Project #: WT -59 Project Description Estimated Project Costs- Construct cover for reservoir to comply with water quality standards. Impact to Water Rates: $6.70 / customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $75,000 $475,000 Total $550,000 Estimated Project Funding, Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $550,000 $550,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $550,000 Total $550,000 McDougal Subzone Fire Pump Project #: WT-64 Project Description Provide water booster pumping capacity to meet fire flows for McDougal subzone. Impact to Water Rates: $0.95 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre- Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $10,000 $65,000 Total $75,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $75,000 $75,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $75.000 Total $75,000 55 1 10th and "N" Street Regional Storm Detention Project #: DR-65 Project Description Estimated Project Costs- Construct regional detention pond for storm water. Impact to Stormwater Rates: $3.14 /customer/yr Pre- Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $50,000 $200,000 Total $250,000 Estimated Project Funding; Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $250,000 Total $250,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 Expenses 1996 1997 $250,000 1998 1999 2000 Rebuild/Upgrade Peninsula College Project #: CL -72 Total $250,000 Project Description Peninsula College has requested City Light take over ownership of their primary distribution facilities. The Port Angeles City Council has authorized the rebuild/upgrade of their system and for City Light to take over ownership of their facilities. Impact to Electric Rates: none Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $385,000 Total $385,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $385,000 Total $385,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $200.000 56 Total $200,000 1 City Light Operations Center Project #: CL - 78 Project Description This project will consolidate all of our crew, equipment and material storage facilities together in a single location adjacent to the existing Corp Yard and our existing pole yard. The project includes site prep, fencing, office/crew quarters, a warehouse, covered storage, and outside storage. Impact to Electric Rates: $3.11 / customer/yr Land Con Other Estimated Project Costs Pre-Construction $10,000 Land/Right-of-Way $40,000 Construction $900,000 Total $950,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $500,000 $450,000 Total $950,000 Yearly Financial_ Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $100,000 $740,000 Total $840,000 Cronauer Property Acquisition Project #: DR - 81 Project Description This project provides for the purchase of property adjacent to the Francis Street trail head for use as a potential park and storm water runoff detention area. Impact to Storrnwater Rates: $3.14 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs- Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $250,000 Total $250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $250,000 Total $250,000 Yearly Financial Summa 57 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $250.000 $250,000 57 MASTER PROJECT LIST & FUNDING SOURCES All told over $112,000,000 worth of projects were considered for inciusion in the CFP. Based on available funding and necessity the projects were separated into two categories; funded and non - funded. Since almost all of the City's existing revenues are already earmarked for either normal operating and maintenance costs or to pay debt service on previously approved capital projects, additional sources of funds are required to provide `ending to complete the Capital Facilities Plan. Most of the projects need to be funded by issuing general obligation or revenue bonds and the analysis shows where the money would come from to pay the debt service on these bonds. Eighty -one projects are recommended for funding over the 1995 -2000 time period and two new utilities need to be created, a Street Utility and a Stormwater Utility, in order to provide the necessary funding. Identified existing and new sources of funds and the amount available for new projects are shown on the attached master project list. The first two pages contain funded projects while the third page contains projects which were considered less critical and for which funding was not available. A detailed description of each column in the master project list follows. The first column, "RANK ", gives the absolute ranking of the projects from most important to least important. This ranking was determined by taking individual committee members rankings and averaging them. The second column, "PROJECT TITLE', gives the title of the projects. The third column, 'PROJECT COST', lists the total project cost. It should be noted that this does not represent the cost to the City but overall project 'ost. In many cases funding is available from outside sources or the project may be a multi -year project for which funds have already been expended. The fourth column, "ANNUAL OPERATING COST", lists any additional annual operating expenses (or savings) that would be created if the project were to be completed. The fifth column, "ANNUALIZED COST', lists the total annual cost to the City which includes any additional operating expenses plus debt service. The sixth column, "OUTSIDE FUNDING REQUIRED ", lists whether the project requires outside funding to be completed (Y) or whether the project will be funded entirely from City funds (N). The seventh column, "OUTSIDE MANDATE, indicates whether the project is mandated by either the State or Federal Govemment (Y) or if the City Council has a choice in completing the project (N). The eighth column, "START DATE ", indicates the year in which funds must first be expended on the project. The remainder of the spreadsheet lists sources of revenue for the various projects. Shaded areas indicate that the project does not qualify for funding from that source. Non - shaded areas indicate that a project is eligible for funding from that source. When a number is present it indicates the recommended funding source for that particular project. In some cases funding is indicated from more than one source. This indicates either joint responsibility for funding or utilizing existing funds in the early years until such time as a new funding source is available; i.e. the new utilities. Continuing with a description of each column, the next three columns are one time sources of funding. The ninth column, "SURPLUS BOND FUND ", represents the expected surplus from the Senior Center Bonds. The tenth column, "G.F. RESERVES ", represents the $2,000,000 balance in the General Fund Reserve. The :teventh column, " ISTEA FUNDS', represents ISTEA moneys that the City has received from the State for use "n transportation projects. 58 MASTER PROJECT LIST & FUNDING SOURCES Columns twelve, "WATER FUND ", thirteen, "WASTEWATER FUND ", fourteen, "SOLID WASTE FUND ", and fifteen, "LIGHT FUND ", represent the existing utilities and the amount shown is the amount of money generated annually for every 1% on the rate base (i.e. 1% increase to water rates would generate $15,289 annually). Column sixteen, "VOTED BOND ", shows the available debt capacity that the City has for borrowing. Funding for projects such as the new library fall into this category. Voted Bonds are treated differently from _ Revenue and General Obligation Bonds in this analysis because the debt service on voted bonds is generated from a special property tax levy while the other bond categories require operating revenue sources to provide for debt service. The remaining columns represent potential new sources of funds for capital projects. Column seventeen, 'RE EXCISE TAX 2', represents the second 1/4 of 1% that the City can collect on real estate transactions and the $90,000 represents what the City has been collecting on the first 1/4 of 1% that was enacted several years ago. Column eighteen, "STREET UTILITY', represents a new utility that could be created by the City Council and the $265,000 represents the maximum amount that current State law would allow us to collect. Column nineteen, "STORMWATER UTILITY", also represents a new utility that could be created by the City Council and the $83,500 represents the amount of money that would be generated for each $1 /month fee. There is no limit on what the fee level could be. The twentieth column, 'MISC G.F.', represents funds available from paying off existing debt on our computer system and the funds which would be generated from the 7% utility tax that would become available if the two new utilites are created. The twenty -first and final column, "B & 0 TAX', represents the funds that would be generated if the City were to adopt a Business & Occupation Tax. The summaries at the bottom of the third page also require some explanation. The last full row shows the funds that become available after 1996 when the computer system debt is paid off. The next partial row shows the total level of expenditures in each column. The next row is divided into three blocks. The first block on the left shows the total expenses associated with those projects that are mandated. The second block in the middle shows what the rate impact to our existing utilities is for the recommended projects. The third block on the right shows what the monthly fee of the new utilities would need to be to provide funding for the recommended projects. The last two rows under the existing utilities columns shows the amount and size of rate increase that would be required by the end of the six year period. This information is provided because the existing utility rates provide funding for some of the projects. 59 z CITY OF PORT ANGELES -- CAPITAL FACILITY PROJECTS 1995 - 2000 --- RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING Nmox 1111111110M m mn ��ni ioi�i uiiiiiiiiiiiriiiniinoi lini iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Emencomossonsummossocion iiiUii1iiiiiiiiiiiiiiilhiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 11 - 1 1111111111 ! : _ - 1 - , , mwwwwwwwwommummuwww0ww0w00000w000mum0u0 Es 0 z z 11. W 2 W 0 0 CITY OF PORT ANGELES --- CAPITAL FACILITY PROJECTS 1995 -2000 OUIIOE l&ANOATE ITMI SURPLUS U. IS1EA ■10ER NtsJIIIVIATE11 SOLD EWITE L101IT VOTED RE EXCISE STREET STOMMYWTER MIIC 8I0 FUN0881 DATE SONOFUNO RESERVES FUNDS FUND FUWO FLOC FIII) I003 TM3 UTILITY tRIJTY OF TM REOuwED 400,000 • 2 MIL 140,000• 15,259 • 23,314 •• 44,350 •• 105,979 •• 15,000,000 90,000'•' 265,000 "• 53,500 •"• '•'•• 11R11. ^cer r. N N 97 r . A:..: r e b . , ~:.., � 3 19.127 ii • Y N 95 :: o- ,.. L oo,0o0 >a N N 95 4,304 11,200 N N 95 2.316 � ..,. N N 96 : i. '` -- 0.596 N N 97 .. ;` 10,676 N N 96 5.393 N Y 99 17,792 • Y N 97 39,683 N N 97 ...i. <:.., , 022 i:: N N 99 10.000 a. :' > , 3 N N 98 • •< € N Y 00 41929 Y N 97 140,000 2,669 N N 98 32,274 Y N 95 y. Y N 95 4.000 , z N N 98 .� ::«.. ", „'. ten :.. € ,., N N 97 €: .' 22,241 Y N 95 "� ^.s . S :: Y N 99 Y N 95 s,. Y N 98, Y N 98 e s ;£. • Y N 98 , Y 14 95 1 .. Y N 95 {{ fg N N 95 60000 60,000 Y N 95 4,265 ? 4,235 Y N 95 9,156 9,156 N N 98 18,737 Y N 99 25.717 N N 95 00,000 N N 97 s .. 11,120 N N 96 2,211 � (6.014) : . (:.:'N .. .:: :::...: (51,949) TOTALS 400,000 _ 370,241 _ 140.000 631,656 326,469 630,746 132,774 20,100.000 0 262,839 97.659 (4.511)_ 34,578' 41. 14.00% 14.21 1.22% MONTHLY FEE 61.97 5125 NOT PROVIDED FOR IN EXISTING RATES 565.960 99,701 (5,506) 39,603 % RATE INCREASE REQUIRED 33.33% 4.26% .012% 0.37% 8 a • s ; � N 3 f i g O O O l C D M W p OO O D M C D M M O M O 0 D 0 01 01 0 O$ 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 7 O f Z Z Z Z Z Z Z } 2 2 2 2} Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ra- Z} Z Z Z Z Z Z} Z Z Z Z} Z O O Y &*& O' r b a O !V O O E w I O' O w O. 411.929 15,123 62.274 0 O g o n O O O O O O O O$ 1 7f P 1` A l g N 0O .O 7 1 : .: ; _. 955,321 p Z g O Q tj O Q O jS O O O so O O O O li O so O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O !!. N a Q j p ii §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ N 8 IV p o O O N p p H R O 10 A^ R S y O f� O 8 A of I 75,000 250,000 § §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ O O W § 1ff § O ri 8 O qf § Mf yp � 19 R S f f 19 N Ifl �}py O C �y ■ PROJECT TITLE f II li 11 JLL 11 lid "co 111101 2 2 a a 2 n 8 0 2 a 2 Q Q 4.4 ma PO 2 2 A A A A 8 T Fs O Le O A 2 2 O O 2 W O WIZ ;IT iQ O 1 z. 2 K W ZW l it O 1' 3 0 2- =g 114 0 *2 W O s *5 wiz G. H 3 • 3 o- Z O X�X O F zt t5 u m W 3 zm o, h W a G 0; 2 E J 0 a d 0 a1W 0. o I On W $ W 0 mg V z IP M; O 1- O w mg dm W Wg 5R N a . 5j i um U WC Ow W LL W N O m 2 LL 0 2 0 = J 0 1- 0 2 1 a CITY OF PORT ANGELES --- CAPITAL FACILITY PROJECTS 1995 -2000 --- FUNDING NOT AVAILABLE wax« z w aux. . ■ :eoo'. +.. +-�" >. ��+.G :^^t!x >aa[ ro>b o.� cva r�-^j W U i° N r ' �8 4' i o�22 N N p A- - t GA r^ it g § °"B o""I p 4 "i ' LP, 8 tig i g i g 2- f I app - : 3 liO .21i -,t R E s ° § g § oog 1 ^ :' I g ri p Q `� o o R `� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 § 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 12 §R Yf Q 8; O Q Q 8Z Y01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O Q SOg j j� ��i o 0 0 iQ K E ' ,O O �f 8 g g g g g g g g g g 8 g 8 8 g g 8 g 8 g g 8 8 g S g g g g g g g g g g� G O 1.000.0 q.000 0 O O O l2,900,0 6,250.0 O O O 6 6 0 6° M O'0Sf 0 0 0 0 8 0 8' ° O O o O 6 ri O' 6 8 s25,a 0 8 0 6 6 6 8 6 f PROJECT TITLE x�y .5 K N 1 i • r L et a 1 • 3 N LL 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 0. 1 1 w 1 GENERAL PURPOSE Citywide GIS Project #: Project Description This project will consolidate and upgrade the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) that Public Works, City Light, and the Police Department currently have. The project will involve new software and some new hardware and will provide all city departments with access to a database with geographic references. Impact to Utility Rates: Impact to Property Taxes: $1.05 /customer/yr $0.001 /$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right - of-Way Construction Other $65,000 $65,000 Estimated Project Funding Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $65,000 $65,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $45,000 $20,000 Total $65,000 City Imaging System Project #: Project Description This project will provide a centralized system capable of electronically storing and retrieving City documents as an image of the original. Documents would be scanned into the system and can be retrieved and hard copies produced. These systems also have sophisticated search algorithms to quickly find information by key words. Impact to Utility Rates: Impact to Property Taxes: $1.27 /customer /yr $0.018 /$1,000 /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $110,000 $110,000 Estimated Project Funding Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $110,000 $110,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $110,000 Total $110,000 64 1 'Nest Side Fire Station Project #: Project Description This project will provide for property acquisition, construction, and equipment necessary to establish an ancillary fire station to serve - esidents on the West side of Port Angeles. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.6161$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other Total Estimated Project $75,000 $250,000 $250,000 $575,000 Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $575,000 $575,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Expenses $75,000 $250,000 $250,000 2000 Total $575,000 East Side Fire Station Project #: Project Description This project will provide for property acquisition, construction, and equipment necessary to establish an ancillary fire station to serve residents on the East side of Port Angeles. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.6161$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right-of-Way Cons Othe $75,000 Construction $250,000 Other $250,000 $575,000 Estimated Project Funding Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $575,000 $575.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 _Expenses 1996 $75.000 1997 1998 1999 2000 $250,000 $250,000 Total $575.000 65 Pool EnhancementiYouth Wing Project #: Project Description This project will provide for the addition of a youth wing to the existing City Pool. The wing will contain meeting and recreation areas for youth. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.0141$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $125,000 Total $125,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $125,000 Total $125,000 Financial Summa New Pool Project #: Project Description This project will provide for a new municipal pool for Port Angeles. Recommendation from Public Meeting. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.550/$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre-Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $100,000 $4,900,000 Total $5,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $5,000,000 Total $5,000,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $100,000 $4,900,000 Total $5,000,000 66 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Expenses $60,000 $60,000 New Pool Project #: Project Description This project will provide for a new municipal pool for Port Angeles. Recommendation from Public Meeting. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.550/$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre-Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $100,000 $4,900,000 Total $5,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $5,000,000 Total $5,000,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $100,000 $4,900,000 Total $5,000,000 66 New Youth Center Project #: Project Description This project will provide for building a youth center in Port Angeles. Presently teenagers and other young adults have no place to congregate in at least a semi - supervised environment. Recommendation from Public Meeting. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.225/$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $100,000 $1,900,000 Total $2.000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 Expenses $100,000 $1,900.000 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total $2.000,000 New Skating Rink Project #: Project Description This project will provide for a new municipal skating rink for Port Angeles. Recommendation from Public Meeting. Impact to Property Taxes: $0.115/$1,000/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $100,000 $900,000 Total $1,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $100,000 $900,000 Total $1,000.000 67 11 TRANSPORTATION 8th & Cherry Signalization Project #: Project Description Estimated Project Costs This project will upgrade the existing signal with pedestrian signals, pre - emption traffic loops and signal heads on mast arms. Impact to Street Rates: $0.13 /customer /yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $8,000 $162,000 Total $170.000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $153,000 $17,000 Total $170,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 Expenses $170.000 1999 2000 Total $170,000 Citywide Signal Pre - emption Project #: Project Description This project will install emergency indicator lights on all traffic signals and provide controlers for all emergency vehicles. Impact to Street Rates: $2.62/customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $20.000 $330,000 Total $350.000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $350,000 $350,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $350.000 Total $350,000 69 T 1st & Peabody Signal Project #: Project Description Estimated Project Costs This project will upgrade the existing signal with pedestrian signals, pre - emption traffic loops and signal heads on mast arms. Impact to Street Rates: $0.13 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $8,000 $162,000 Total $170,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $153,000 $17,000 Total $170.000 Yearly Financial Summary Expenses 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 $170,000 2000 Peabody Street Reconstruction Project #: Total $170,000 Project Description This project will reconstruct Peabody St. from Front St. to 8th Street and includes rebuilding the shoulders and overlaying the roadway. Impact to Street Rates: $0.81 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $40.000 $500,000 Total $540,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $432,000 $108,000 Total $540.000 Yearly Financial Summary Expenses 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 $540,000 70 Total $540,000 Ennis Street Guardrail Project #: Project Description This project replaces the old guardrail on Ennis Street from Columbia St. 800 feet North. Impact to Street Rates: $0.10 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $6,000 $60,000 Total $66,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $52,800 $13,200 Total $66.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 Expenses 1996 1997 1998 $66,000 1999 2000 Total $66,000 Laurel Street/Ahlvers Road Reconstruction Project #: Project Description This project reconstructs Laurel St. from Viewcrest to Ahlvers Rd. and Ahlvers Rd. from Laurel St. to Peabody St. providing a 40 foot wide roadway, curb, gutter and sidewalks. Impact to Street Rates: $5.77 / customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $90,000 $680,000 Total • $770,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $770,000 $770,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $90,000 $680.000 Total $770,000 71 Pine Street Realignment Project #: Project Description This project will realign Pine St. South of 16th St. in conjunction with the County and State project to rebuild the bridge over US101. Impact to Street Rates: $0.34 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $45,000 Total $45,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $45,000 $45,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 Expenses $5,000 1996 $40,000 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total $45.000 Hill Street Intersection Reconstruction Project #: Project Description This project reconstructs Hill St. and the 4th & "L" intersection. Impact to Street Rates: $1.18 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $18,000 $140,000 Total $158,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $158,000 $158,000 Yearly Financial Summary _xpenses 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 $158,000 72 Total 5158.000 8th & "C" Signal Project #: Project Description Estimated Project Costs This project will install a traffic signal at the 8th & "C" intersection. Impact to Street Rates: $0.13 /customer/yr Pre- Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $8,000 $162,000 $170,000 Estimated Project Funding Total Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $153,000 $17,000 Total $170,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $170,000 Total $170,000 Milwaukee Drive Project #: Project Description This project will extend Milwaukee Dr. in two phases. Phase I would extend the roadway from "N" St. to 18th St. and Phase II would extend the roadway from 18th St. to the Lower Elwha Rd. Impact to Street Rates: $21.73 /customer /yr Estimated Project Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other Costs $100,000 $2,800,000 Total $2,900.000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $2,900,000 $2,900,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Expenses $1.500,000 2000 $1,400,000 Total $2.900,000 73 Lauridsen Blvd. Reconstruction Project #: Project Description This project will reconstruct Lauridsen Blvd. from the Truck Rt. to "L" St. Impact to Street Rates: $5.77lcustomer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right - of-Way Construction Other $70,000 $700,000 Total $770,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $770.000 $770,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 Expenses 1998 1999 $70,000 2000 $700,000 Total $770,000 10th Street Reconstruction Project #: Project Description This project reconstructs 10th St. from "1" Street to Flores St. with curb, gutter, sidewalk and 44 foot roadway. Impact to Street Rates: $10.49 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $200,000 $1,200,000 Total $1,400,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $1,400,000 $1,400,000 Yeariy Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $1,400,000 Total $1,400,000 74 Park Avenue Reconstruction Project #: Project Description This project will reconstruct Park Av. from Race St. to College with curb, gutter, sidewalks and 40 foot roadway. Impact to Street Rates: $6.37 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other 550,000 5800,000 Total 5850,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $850,000 5850,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 Expenses 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 $850,000 Total $850,000 Citywide Traffic Signal Interconnect Project #: Project Description This project acquires the equipment to interconnect all the traffic signals in the City to allow for computer control of signals to improve traffic flow. Impact to Street Rates: $2.25 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $30,000 5270,000 Total 5300,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total 5300,000 5300,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses 5300.000 Total $300,000 75 1 White's Creek Crossing Project #: Project Description This project provides for an arterial crossing of White's Creek to connect Golf Course Rd. with Race St. Impact to Street Rates: $46.82/customer/yr Pre-C Lan Con Other Estimated Project Costs Pre-Construction $500,000 Land/Right-of-Way $750,000 Construction $5,000,000 Total $6,250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $6,250,000 $6,250,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Expenses 2000 $6,250,000 Total $6.250,000 Golf Course Road Intersection Project #: Project Description This project rechannets the Golf Course Road intersection and the immediate area to eliminate merging problems and improving traffic flow. The project also includes additional signals. Impact to Street Rates: $2.621customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $50,000 $300,000 Total $350,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $350,000 $350,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 Expenses 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 $350,000 Total $350.000 76 18th Street Reconstruction Project #: Project Description This project reconstructs 18th St. from the Landfill to "M" St. with curb, gutter, sidewalks and a 44 foot roadway. Impact to Street Rates: $15.73 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $100,000 $2,000,000 Total $2,100,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $2,100,000 $2.100,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 Expenses 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 $2,100,000 Total $2,100,000 Truck Route Intersection at US101 Project #: Project Description This project provides westbound to northbound access from US101 to the Tumwater Truck Rt. Impact to Street Rates: $1.50 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $150,000 $850,000 Total $1,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $800,000 $200,000 Total $1,000,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $1,000,000 Total $1,000,000 77 T 11 .incoln!Blvd. Rechannelization & Signal Project #: Project Description This project provides an alternate arterial through the City to allow trucks and other through traffic a means to avoid downtown. This is le third phase of an ongoing process. Impact to Street Rates: $2.23 / customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $30,000 $270,000 Total $300,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $300,000 Total $300,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 Expenses 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 $300,000 Total $300,000 Downtown Street Scape Project #: Project Description This project will provide for the integration of athetic elements into the streets and sidewalks of downtown. The addition of planters benches and waste recepticals is also envisioned. Impact to Street Rates: $16.48 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $200,000 $2.000,000 Total $2,200,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $2,200,000 $2.200,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $200.000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Total $2.200,000 78 1 Street Improvements for Bikes Project #: Project Description This project provides for modifications to existing arterials to better accomodate bicicyles. Impact to Street Rates: $7.49 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre-Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $50,000 $950,000 Total $1,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $1,000,000 $1,000.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $500,000 $500,000 Total $1,000,000 Project #: Project Description Estimated Project Costs Estimated Completion Date: Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other Total Estimated Project Funding $0 Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $0 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses Total $0 79 1 ENTERPRISE 10th /11th AIIey Stormwater interceptor Project #: Project Description Estimated Project Costs This project will construct a storm line in the 10th/11th AIIey to control) flooding. Impact to Stormwater Rates: $6.59 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $50,000 $475,000 Total $525,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $525,000 $525,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 Expenses 1997 1998 1999 2000 $525,000 Citywide Catch Basin Modification Project #: Total $525,000 Project Description This project replaces existing catch basin inlets with more efficient inlets in problem areas. Impact to Stormwater Rates: $12.56 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $40,000 $960,000 Total $1,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $1,000,000 Total $1,000,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $1,000.000 81 Total $1,000.000 Lincoln Park Stormwater Interceptor Project #: Project Description Estimated Project Costs This project will construct a storm line from Lincoln Park to the West to relieve flooding. Impact to Stormwater Rates: $3.14 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right - of-Way Construction Other $40,000 $210,000 Total $250.000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $250,000 $250,000 Yearly Financial. Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $250,000 Milwaukee Drive Stormwater improvements Project #: Total $250,000 Project Description This project provides for Milwaukee Dr. area stormwater improvements. Impact to Stormwater Rates: $13.14 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $100.000 $945.000 Total $1,045.000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $1,045,000 $1,045,000 Yearly Financial Summary Expenses 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 $1,045.000 82 Total $1,045,000 Laurel Street Outfall Extension Project #: Project Description This project will extend the Laurel St. CSO outfall into deeper waters. Impact to Wastewater Rates: $1.95 /customerfyr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $10,000 $140,000 Total $150,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations $150,000 Total $150,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 Expenses $150.000 1997 1998 1999 2000 Golf Course Road Sewer interceptor Project #: Total $150,000 Project Description This project will extend the sewer main from the Penn St. /First St. area to Golf Course Rd. to provide additional capacity and service to new areas. Impact to Wastewater Rates: $13.00 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs $120,000 Right- of-Way $200,000 Construction $680,000 Pre-Construction Land/ Con Other Total $1,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $1,000,000 Total $1,000,000 83 Oak Street Outfall Extension Project #: Project Description Estimated Project Costs This project will replace the damaged pipe and extend the Oak St. outfall into deeper waters. Impact to Wastewater Rates: $2.60 /customer/yr Pre- Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $10,000 $190,000 Total $200,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $200,000 $200,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $200,000 Lincoln Park Sewer Pump Station Project #: Total $200.000 Project Description This project will provide a new sewer pump station to serve Lincoln Park and potential areas currently outside of the City limits. Impact to Wastewater Rates: $3.29 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $15,000 $235,000 Total $250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $250,000 $250,000 Yearly Financial Summary Expenses 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 $250,000 84 Total $250,000 Critchfield Road Utilities Project #: Project Description Estimated Project Costs This project will provide water and sewer to the area South of the airport. Impact to Utility Rates: $14.47 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $90,000 $1,200,000 Total $1,290,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $1,290,000 $1,290,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 Expenses 1999 $1,290.000 2000 Total $1.290,000 Golf Course Road PRV's Project #: Project Description This project will provide for two pressure relief valves to separate zones and improve service. Impact to Water Rates: $1.22 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $100,000 Total $100,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $100,000 $100,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $100,000 Total $100,000 85 1 Concrete Cylinder Pipe Replacement Project #: Project Description Estimated Project Costs This project will replace the majority of concrete cylinder water pipe in the system. This pipe has been responsible for significant failures in the last few years. Impact to Water Rates: $12.18 /customer/yr Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $1,000,000 Total $1.000.000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $1.000,000 Total $1,000,000 Inter -tie of High Service Area Project #: Project Description This project will construct a watermain linking the high service area with the goal of improving pressure and reducing pumping. Impact to Water Rates: $8.65 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land /Right -of -Way Construction Other $213,000 $497,000 Total $710,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $710,000 $710,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $710,000 Total $710,000 86 1f Control System Upgrade Project #: Project Description This project upgrades outdated control systems for the water pumps on the Eiwha including: alarm systems, backup power, telemetry and pump panels. This will result in better collection of operating data & signals being sent to one coordinated location. Impact to Water Rates: $5.54 /customer/yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other $60,000 $395,000 Total $455,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $455,000 $455.000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 Expenses $30,000 1997 $425,000 1998 1999 2000 Total $455,000 Container Conversion Project #: Project Description This project provides for the conversion of the existing 300 gallon residential containers to 60 or 90 gallon individual containers. This will require a revised collection schedule and the purchase of a new vehicle. Impact to Solid Waste Rates: $18.79 /customer /yr Estimated Project Costs Pre - Construction Land/Right -of -Way Construction Other r $500,000 $500,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer Outside Revenue Bond Proceeds Appropriations Total $500,000 $500,000 Yearly Financial Summary 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Expenses $500,000 87 Total $500.000 Planning Commission Minutes June 14, 1995 E11Lfl PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND MAP INCLUDING THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1995- 2000: City -wide: Yearly review as required by ordinance. Commissioner Winters noted for the record that although he was not in attendance at the May 24, 1995, meeting at which time the first public hearing for the current proposed amendments was considered, he had listened to the tapes of that meeting and was confident that he could act on the issue at this point. Chair Nutter opened the public hearing. Planning Director Collins reviewed the Planning Department's May 24, 1995, report covering the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map including the incorporation of the 1995 -2000 Capital Facilities Plan. He pointed out that the Commission had failed to adopt the Comprehensive Plan changes to the level of service (LOS) standards and the school concurrency policy wording discussed at the May 24 meeting. Amendments proposed to the text of the Comprehensive Plan under the Capital Facilities Element (Policies B.3 and B.5) are clarifications in standards recommended by the utility and service providers (City Light and Public Works Department) to better reflect the actual level of service (LOS) standards use in those industries. Staff provided more detailed legal notice following the May 24, 1995, hearing that more clearly identified all of the specific areas recommended for change on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Additionally, it was determined that the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) 1995 -2000, which was adopted by the City Council in September, 1994, was intended for incorporation in the Comprehensive Plan update during its review in 1995. No changes are proposed at this time to the CFP. Recommendations for the proposed changes in land use designations are in large part to acknowledge existing uses and are considered to be more housekeeping measures as they were inadvertent mistakes the first time around. Those areas include: the west end of the property located at Eighth and "I" Streets (commonly known as Gund Plaza) west of the Park View Villas site; property located at the southeast corner of Eighth and "G" Streets (six lots), to recognize the rezone of that property several years ago; the Pine Road Village apartments site, located west of Pine Street at Lauridsen Boulevard, apartment locations at "C" Street at Eighteenth Street, and the "C" Extension south of Lauridsen Boulevard, to acknowledge the existing high density development rather than the medium density designation previously given the area in 1994; the vacant block of property between "D" and "E" Streets and between Seventeenth and Eighteenth Streets is proposed as changing from medium density to low density to recognize the recent City action to deny a requested rezone to medium density zoning at that location; refinement of designation located on the Tumwater Creek hillside in the area north of Fourth Street to reflect the physical characteristics of the hillside; an area on Lauridsen Boulevard that failed to have its designated Commercial, Office, and Community Shopping District 12 Planning Commission Minute -June 14, 1995 Pine & MDR HDR existing development Lauridsen Melody Lane MDR HDR/LDR existing and planned development Wabash & MDR LDR existing development Eckard Commissioner Winters seconded the motion, which passed 6-0. Commissioner Souders moved to recommend incorporation of the 1995 -2000 Capital Facilities Plan as adopted by the City Council in September, 1994, into the City's Comprehensive Plan, and that the level of service (LOS) standards, Capital Facilities Element B.3 and B.5, and the school concurrency wording proposed by staff be included as amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, citing the findings and conclusions listed in the Planning Department Report dated June 12, 1995, as follows: Findings: 1. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments have been proposed by various City Departments charged with implementing the Comprehensive Plan's goals, policies, and objectives. 2. The Comprehensive Plan has been reviewed with respect to the proposed amendments. 3. The amendments were submitted in a timely manner by the March 31, 1995, deadline for the annual review and according to the procedures that have been established by the City consistent with the Growth Management Act. 4. The School Concurrency Task Force met on September 15, October 13, November 10, and December 15, in 1994, and on February 3, 1995, when it completed its report to the Port Angeles City Council. 5. The Environmental Impact Statement for the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City of Port Angeles SEPA Responsible Official for the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments on April 25, 1995. Conclusions: A. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments are in the public use and interest. B. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies, and Objectives as identified in the staff report and with the Growth Management Act. 126 Planning Commission Minutes - June 14, 1995 existing zoning pattern on it; and an area along Eighth Street west of Race Street which should indicate a Community Shopping District zoning designation rather than a low density residential based on the current use of the property; Commercial, Office zoning should be shown south of Water Street as it was rezoned two years ago; acknowledgement of the north side of Melody Lane/Golf Course Road as Residential High Density with the remainder of the Uplands Subdivision area north of Melody Lane as low density rather than high density since low density is the development pattern of the area and the Wabash and Eckard Avenue areas as low density rather than medium density since low density is the development pattern of the area. Rick Melvin, 3414 Wabash, spoke for his neighborhood, including neighbors Mr. and Mrs. Bryce Lorentzen, Mr. and Mrs. Bill Tiderman, Rex and Joni Waldron, he and his wife that they concur with the Planning staffs recommendation to designate the Wabash/Eckard Avenue area as low density residential from the previous medium density residential designation. There being no further public testimony, Chair Nutter closed the public hearing. Following discussion, Commissioner Campbell moved to adopt the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map changes proposed as follows: Area Land Use New LU Rationale 8th & Race LDR/OP C Commercial should bisect Open Space along 8th not vice versa (generalized mapping error) Water & Jones LDR C unintentional land use change (general -ized mapping error) Tumwater & 4th I OS unintentional land use change (general -ized mapping error) 8th & H HDR C planned development and policy to retain commercial option 8th & G LDR HDR unintentional land use change (general -ized mapping error) 18th & D MDR LDR policy to retain low density residential C & 18th MDR HDR existing development C Extension MDR HDR existing development 129 130 1T 1 Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 1995 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: City- wide- Yearly review as required by ordinance. Chair Nutter opened the public hearing. Planning Director Collins reviewed the Planning Department's report covering the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Map and referred to several display maps to indicate the mapping areas proposed for amendment on the Comprehensive Plan Map. He further explained about changing the Comprehensive Plan Map rather than the zoning of certain areas. The areas proposed for amendment in large part are to acknowledge existing uses and are considered to be more a housekeeping measure as they were inadvertent mistakes the first time around. Those areas include: the west end of the property located at Eighth and "I" Streets, commonly known as Gund Plaza, west of the Park View Villas site; property located at the southeast corner of Eighth and "G" Streets (six lots), to recognize the rezone of that property several years ago; the Pine Road Village apartments site, located west of Pine Street at Lauridsen Boulevard, apartment locations at "C" Street at Eighteenth Street, and the "C" Extension south of Lauridsen Boulevard, to acknowledge the existing high density development rather than the medium density designation previously given the area in 1994; the vacant block of property between "D" and "E" Streets and between Seventeenth and Eighteenth Streets is proposed as changing from medium density to low density to recognize the recent City action of denial of a request to medium density at that location; refinement of designation located on the Tumwater Creek hillside in the area north of Fourth Street to reflect the physical characteristics of the hillside; an area on Lauridsen Boulevard that failed to have its designated Commercial, Office, and Community Shopping District existing zoning pattern on it; and an area along Eighth Street west of Race Street which should indicate a Community Shopping District zoning designation rather than a low density residential based on the current use of the property; Commercial, Office zoning should be shown south of Water Street as it was rezoned two years ago; acknowledgement of the north side of Melody Lane/Golf Course Road as Residential High Density with the remainder of the Uplands Subdivision area north of Melody Lane as low density rather than high density since low density is the development pattern of the area; and the Wabash and Eckard Avenue areas as low density rather than medium density since low density is the development pattern of the area. He responded to Chair Nutter explaining that the outlined areas on the map are areas where the zoning does not concur with the Comprehensive Plan Map, but it is staffs recommendation to leave those areas, which are already developed, as is until property owners in the area request the proposed changes.. Secondly, he pointed out that amendments proposed to the text of the Comprehensive 131 Planing Commission Minutes May 24, 1995 Plan under the Capital Facilities Element (Policies B.3 and B.5) are clarifications in standards recommended by the utility and service providers (City Light and Public Works Department) to better reflect the actual level of service (LOS) standards use in those industries. Finally, he referred to a letter dated February 3, 1995, from the Port Angeles Public Schools Office of the Superintendent addressing the School Concurrency Task Force efforts and referred to proposed language drafted by staff in an effort to merge the Task Force recommendations into the Comprehensive Plan document. He noted that the draft language would be forwarded to the school district for their recommendation prior to the City Council's public hearing on June 20, 1995. Skip Berquam, School Business Administrator, 1130 Grant Avenue, affirmed the recommendation of the Port Angeles School Board in the letter of February 3, 1995. He noted that if the level of service of schools deteriorates as a result of an increase in development it then becomes the entire community's problem. There being no further public testimony, Chair Nutter closed the public hearing. Commissioner German commented that the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan as outlined by staff are good. The exercise proves the Comprehensive Plan process is working and as time goes by the kinks will be worked out as necessary. Commissioner Campbell voiced concern with the wording proposed addressing school concurrency in that the level of service for schools may be reduced at some point in the future if development occurs rapidly with no means to account for the increased load to the neighborhood/community school facilities. Commissioner Souders had no problem with most of the land use issues with the exception of the proposal to downgrade the area on Campbell Avenue from medium density to low density. She expressed strong concern that the school concurrency proposed wording results in a reaction to new development, not preparation to avoid the need for the reactive mode. Commissioner Campbell concurred with Commissioner Souders' concerns but noted that as a member of the task force he felt the wording proposed by staff would result in an attempt to avoid killer impact fees. The policy statement recognizes that everyone, the County, School District, and City, has an interest in the provision of school facilities. At the present time, with the passing of the recent school bond, the Port Angeles School District is not in too bad of shape; but a close eye should be kept on the situation in order to not allow it to deteriorate. 132 1 Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 1995 Commissioner Nutter felt uncomfortable with the wording as proposed as it doesn't accomplish anything but allows for a reduction of LOS standards in the event of strong development of neighborhoods. Commissioner German saw the proposal as a way to plan while assessing the manner in which the population grows or declines in the years to come. Director Collins explained the School District's avenues of involvement through the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requirements for review of new proposed developments and that issues such as school facilities are considered in a SEPA review as well as infrastructure needs and traffic concerns. Commissioner Philpott moved to recommend the proposed amendments be made to the City's Comprehensive Plan Map as outlined by Director Collins in his presentation with the exception of the area of Wabash and Eckard Avenue, and cited the following findings and conclusions for that action: Findings: 1. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments have been proposed by various City Departments charged with implementing the Comprehensive Plan's goals, policies, and objectives. 2. The Comprehensive Plan has been reviewed with respect to the proposed amendments. 3. The amendments were submitted in a timely manner by the March 31, 1995, deadline for the annual review and according to the procedures that have been established by the City consistent with the Growth Management Act. 4. The School Concurrency Task Force met on September 15, October 13, November 10, and December 15, in 1994, and on February 3, 1995, when it completed its report to the Port Angeles City Council. 5. The Environmental Impact Statement for the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City of Port Angeles SEPA Responsible Official for the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments on April 25, 1995. Conclusions: A. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments are in the public use and interest. f 133 Planning commission Minutes May 24, 1995 B. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies, and Objectives as identified in the staff report and with the Growth Management Act. C. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments are consistent with the established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan, Title 18, Port Angeles Municipal Code. Commissioner German seconded the motion, which passed 5-0. Director Collins asked for clarification on the Wabash and Eckard area proposal so that the matter of notification could be pursued with the City Attorney. 134 CITY OF PORT ANGFI.F_S Planning Department City Hall Port Angeles. WA COMPREHENSIVE LAN AMENDMENT CPA 95(01)05 1. APPLICANT: City of Port Angeles 2. REOUESTED AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: May 24. 1995 The applicant is proposing to amend the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Port Angeles during the annual review process. Three areas of proposed changes (area -wide land use map, school concurrency policy, and level of service standards) were submitted in a timely manner and have been reviewed by City departments. 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The following Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies, and Objectives appear to be most applicable to the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment: IV. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Goal A: To manage growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial to the community as a whole, is sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals and is consistent with the State of Washington's Growth Management Act. Polilcy A.1: In all its actions and to the extent consistent with the provisions of this comprehsive plan, the City shall strive to implement the following goals of the State Growth Management Act: a -m. Policy A.5: Urban services/facilities shall be provided consistent with the Capital Facilities Element. Policy A.12: Urban services to be provided within the PAUGA should include, at a minimum, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste collection/disposal systems, water systems, urban roads and pedestrian facilities, street cleaning services, transit systems, stormwater systems, police and fire and emergency services systems, electrical and communication systems, school and health care facilities, and neighborhood and/or community parks. Policy A.17: All development regulations shall be promulgated with due regard for private property rights in order to avoid regulatory takings or violation of due process and to protect private property rights of landowners from arbitrary and discriminatory actions. 1 135 Staff Report CPA 95(05)01 May 24, 1995 Page2 V. LAND USE ELEMENT Goal A: To guide current and future development within the City in a manner that provides certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the challenges and opportunities of the future. Policy A.1: The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map should be used as a conceptual guide for determining current and long range zoning and other land use decisions. The map's land use designations are intended to show areas where general land use types are allowed. The area between land use designations should be considered an imprecise margin in order to provide flexibility in determining the boundary of such areas. When determining appropriate zoning designations for an area near a margin, the goals, policies, and objectives of the Land Use Element should take precedence. Policy A.2: All land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council and/or any of its appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and its land use map. Objective A.1: The City will review and revise as necessary the existing Zoning Ordinance, Zoning Map, and other development regulations to ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Goal B: To have a community where residential development and use of the land are done in a manner that is compatible with the environment, the characteristics of the use and the users, and the desired urban design of the City. Goal C: To have a community of viable districts and neighborhoods with a variety of residential opportunities for personal interaction, fulfillment and enjoyment, attractive to people of all ages, characteristics and interests. Goal D: To create and maintain a healthy and diverse commecial sector for a balanced and stable local economy. Goal E: To provide shopping opportunities which meet the needs of all City residents and visitors in safe, usable shopping areas that are compatible with the surrounding area and uses, the environment, and the desired urban design of the City. Goal F: To provide a pleasant, safe, and attractive shopping environment in the traditional downtown waterfront area which provides a wide variety of shopping, dining, entertainment, and housing opportunities for visitors and residents alike. 136 Staff Report CPA 95(05)01 May 24, 1995 Page3 Goal G: To create and maintain a healthy and diverse industrial sector for a balanced and stable local economy. Goal H: To provide opportunities for industrial development in a manner which efficiently uses the community's various attributes and natural resources, has minimal impact on the environment, and contributes to the City's quality of life. Goal I: To create open space relief within the urban landscape, to retain natural landscapes, to preserve fish and wildlife habitat, and to provide natural corridors which connect wildlife habitats. Policy I.1: The City should further public interest by designating open spaces to preserve unique or major physical features, such as marine shorelines, bluffs, ravines, streams, wetlands, wildlife habitat, and other environmentally sensitive areas deemed of significant importance to the community. Goal J: To encourage the development of parks and recreational opportunities for all residents of the City and to increase access to natural areas in a manner that minimizes impact. VII. UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT Goal A: To provide or allow the opportunity for services and facilities which enhance the quality of life for Port Angeles citizens of all ages, characteristics, needs, and interests. Goal B: To support services and facilities through different levels of participation in cooperation with other public or private agencies. Goal D: To provide utility services in an efficient and cost - effective manner. Policy D.10: Planning for utility services shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the Capital Facilities Element. IX. CONSERVATION ELEMENT Goal A: To create and maintain a community with a high quality of life where the land is used in a manner that is compatible with the area's unique physical features, its natural, historical, archaeological, and cultural amenities, and the overall environment. Policy A.2: The City should promote comptability between the land and its use by regulating the intensity of the land use. Staff Report CPA 95(05)01 May 24, 1995 Page4 Goal B: To protect and enhance the area's unique physical features, its natural, historical, archaeological, and cultural amenities, and the overall environment. Policy B.1: The City should further the public interest by protecting and enhancing the area's unique physical features, valuable natural, historical, archaeological, and cultural amenities, and the overall environment, while recognizing the rights of private ownership. Policy B.2: The City should maintain and preserve its unique physical features and natural amenities, such as creeks, streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands, ravines, bluffs, shorelines, and fish and wildlife habitats. Policy B.16: The City should designate open space areas to preserve major or unique physical features and/or to serve as natural greenbelts and wildlife corridors. Goal C: To promote community awareness of the importance of environmental, historical, and cultural amenities, the responsible use of such resources, and the use of the land with minimal impact on its unique physical features, its natural, historical, and cultural amenities, and the overall environment. X. CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Goal A: To provide and maintain safe and financially feasible urban services and capital facilities at or above stated levels of service to all City residents and the general public. Policy A.1: The Comprehensive Plan shall establish general level of service standards for each urban utility and service. Such standards shall be used to determine the impacts of development. Policy A.2: The City should, at a minimum, ensure the continuation of established level of service standards for all urban utilities and services to the extent and in the manner provided herein. Policy A.11: The City should require the following services and facilities within six years from the time of development: parks and recreation services and facilities, and transit system. Objective 1: The City will establish a seven - member task force for the purpose of reviewing the issue of school concurrency. Goal B: To provide urban streets and utilities at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the general public. 138 Staff Report CPA 95(05)01 May 24, 1995 Page5 Policy B.3: The City shall not approve any development that is not served with water service at or greater than the following level of service standards at the time of development: Single family units: 2 gallons per minute 0 30 psi y (fire -1000 gallons per minute 0 20 p Multi- family units: 1 gallon per minute @ 30 psi (fire per ISO guidelines) ` .1 Commercial: per ISO guidelines Industrial: per ISO guidelines Policy B.5: The City shall not approve any development that is not served with electrical service at or greater than a level of service standard of 120/220 volts per service at the time of development. Goal C: To provide urban services at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the general public. Policy C.1: The Port Angeles School District should develop a capital facilities plan, which the City will consider for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan... In the interest of conciseness, only the most relevant policies of the Comprehensive Plan have been identified. However, the entire document has been taken into consideration in this review. ' 4. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Environmental Impact Statement for the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City of Port Angeles SEPA Responsible Official for the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments on April 25, 1995. This action fulfills the City's responsibility under the State Environmental Policy Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW. 5. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The various City Departments have reviewed the proposal and offered no additional comments other than the proposed amendments. 6. DEPARTMENT EVALUATION: The proposed changes are either minor corrections to the initial Comprehensive Plan adopted under the Growth Management Act and its deadlines or anticipated recommendations from the School Concurrency Task Force, which was established pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan. Following analysis of Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map differences, changes to the Comp Plan Map were found to be more appropriate than changes to the Zoning Map based on the Comp Plan policies, existing and planned uses, and/or problems related to creating 1 33 Staff Report CPA 95(05)01 May 24, 1995 Page6 nonconforming uses unintentionally. The changes to Capital Facilities Policies B.3 and B.5 were clarifications in the standards recommended by utility /service providers (i.e., the Departments of Public Works, Fire, and City Light). The changes standards better reflect the actual standards that are used by the City. The changes for school concurrency policies recommended by the Task Force represent a consensus between the development industry and the school community, where the development industry is assured that imposition of GMA impact fees on or denial of new development will not be used as a measure to prevent school overcrowding and the school community is assured that school planning will be considered in the City's and the County's planning actions. 7. DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the City Council to approve all of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The following findings and conclusions are provided for your consideration: Findings: 1. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments have been proposed by various City Departments charged with implementing the Comp Plan's goals, policies, and objectives. 2. The Comprehensive Plan has been reviewed with respect to the proposed amendments. 3. The amendments were submitted in a timely manner by the March 31, 1995, deadline for the annual review and according to the procedures that have been established by the City consistent with the Growth Management Act. 4. The School Concurrency Task Force met on September 15, October 13, November 10, and December 15 in 1994 and on February 3, 1995, when it completed its report to the Port Angeles City Council. 5. The Environmental Impact Statement for the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City of Port Angeles SEPA Responsible Official for the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments on April 25, 1995. Conclusions: A. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments are in the public use and interest. Staff Report CPA 95(05)01 May 24, 1995 Pagel B. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies, and Objectives as identified in the staff report and with the Growth Management Act. C. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan amendments are consistent with the established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan, Title 18, Port Angeles Municipal Code. The Planning Commission action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council, which has final City authority on the proposal. Staff contact: Brad Collins 341 142 T Proposed Area -Wide Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Changes Area Zone(s) Land Use New LU Rationale 8th & Race CM/CO LDR /OP C Commercial should bisect Open Space along 8th not vice versa (generalized mapping error) Water & Jones CO LDR C unintentional land use change (general- ized mapping error) Tumwater & 4th PBP I OS unintentional land use change (general- ized mapping error) 8th & H CSD HDR C planned development and policy to retain commercial option 8th & G RHD LDR HDR unintentional land use change (general- ized mapping error) 18th & D RS -7 MDR LDR policy to retain low density residential C & 18th RHD MDR HDR existing development C Extension RHD MDR HDR existing development Pine & RHD MDR HDR existing development Lauridsen Melody Lane RHD MDR HDR /LDR existing and planned development Wabash & RS -9 MDR LDR existing development Eckard 1_43 144 a it y COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION FORM f U Please Note: Deadline date for application is March 31, 1921. 1. APPLICANT City of Port Angeles Planning Department Au Edo MAR 3 1 1996. i•tiic i SA6EUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADDRESS 321 E. 5th St.. Port Angeles. WA 98362 DAYTIME PHONE (360) 457 -0411 2. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLANTEXT/MAP CHANGE (Be specific noting Plan poky Citations.) Attached list of area -wide Comprehensive Plan Land •Use Map changes 3. JUSTIFICATION /REASON FOR CHANGE: Following analysis of Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map differences, changes to the Comp Plan Map were found to be more appropriate than changes to the Zoning Map based on the Comp Plan ,policies, existing and planned uses, and /or problems related to creating nonconforming uses unintentionally. (Use more pages if necessary) File 1: Hearing; Signed 145 1 1 Attachment List of Area -Wide Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Changes Area_,_ yone(s) Land Use New LU Rationale 8th '& G RHD LDR HDR unintentional land use change (general- ized mapping error) 8th & Race CN /CO LDR/OP C Commercial should bisect Open Space along 8th not vice versa (generalized mapping error) Water & Jones CO LDR C unintentional land use change (general- ized mapping error) Valley & 4th PBP I OP unintentional land use change (general- ized mapping error) 8th & H CSD HDR C planned development and policy to retain commercial option 18th & D RS -7 MDR LDR policy to retain low density residential • Melody Lane RHD MDR HDR /LDR existing and planned development C & 18th RHD MDR HDR existing development C Extension RHD MDR HDR existing development Pine & RHD MDR HDR existing development Lauridsen 4, 14[ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION FORM Please Note: Deadline date for application is March 31, 19 91 1. APPLICANT' City of Port Angles Plannitg Departrent ADDRESS Fs ow i eveRr ..r.i J)Jt4R3I95 1 .�s _rrd:r:rvm 321 E. 5th St., Port Angeles, WA 98362 DAYTIME PHONE (360) 457 -0411 2. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLANTEXT/MAP CHANGE (Be specific noting Plan policy citations.) Change the following policies: Comp Flan Capital Facilities Element .Policy B.3 by adding "potable" before "water service" and by replacing "ISO guidlelines" with "Uniform Fire Code" Comp Plan Capital Facilities Element Pnlely 8.5 by r.plari.ng "17(1/77 volts per service" with "118 volts (120 volt base)" 3. JUSTIFICATIONIRFASON FOR CHANGE: The changes follow clarifications in standards recommended by the Public Works Department, Fire Department, and City Light. (Use more pages if necessary) iteto_sk &t.J2A.-=, Signed 7 Policies 1. All arterial streets shall function at an average daily level of service ofD or better. 2. Development on all arterial streets and any other streets identified as school wailing routes shall include pedestrian sidewalks. 3. The City shall not approve any development that is not served with water service at or greater than the following level of service standards at the time of development: a TA' Single family units: 2 gallons per minute (4 30 psi (fire-1000 gallons per minute @ 20 psi) Multi- family units: 1 gallon per minute @ 30 psi (fire per ISO guidelines) u F %& c' Commercial: per ISO guidelines Industrial: per ISO guidelines 4. The City shall not approve any development that is not served with sewer service at or greater than a level of service standard of 300 gallons per day per person at the time of development. 5. The City shall not approve any development that -is not sery with electrical service at or greater than a level of service standard of t the time of development. 118 1 is (t2o vc \ bale) The City not approve deve o inert that increases a .site's 6. y pP any P p ost - development stormwater run -off beyond that allowed by the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin as adopted by the City. 7 The City should not approve any development that cannot be served with telecommunications service at or greater than the following level of service standards at the time of development: Telephone Residential: 1 service per unit Commercial: 1 service per business Industrial: 1 service per business 77 148 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION FORM Please Note: Deadline date for application is March 31, 1995. 1. MAR 3 1 1996 FORI i;NG L S pppUCAN'r City of Port Angeles Planning Department PLANNING OEPARTMDIT ADDRESS 321 E. 5th St., Port Angeles, WA 98362 DAYTIME PHONE (360) 457 -0411 2. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT/MAP CHANGE (Be specific noting Plan policy citations.) Attached Comprehensive Plan school concurrency policy 'changes 3. JUSTIFICATION /REASON FOR CHANGE: The changes follow the recommendations of the School Concurrency Task Force established under Comp Plan Capital Facilities Element Objective A.1. (Use more pages if necessary) Rec'd/By: 3/2 I f4 ( Filet?: Haring: ' '/9r Signed 1:19 Attachment to Comprehensive Plan School Concurrency Policy Changes • Add * schools to Capital Facilities Element Policy A.11. Replace Capital Facilities Element Objective A.1 with the following: At the time Comprehensive Plans for the City and the County are reviewed. one representative each from the port Anaeles School District No. 121. Clailam County. anc, the City of Port Anaeles will meet to consider possible recommendations for amendment of policies affecting school facilities. Add the following new paragraph to the end of Capital Facilities Element Policy C.1: established level of service standards and adeauate school fundina is not available. then the demand for new facilities will be reduced (e.a.. throuah Year round use of schools or by matchina arade band enrollment to ac 0 s -1• s will be reduced to keep both schools and housina development affordable to the maiority of Port Angeles • • • • .L Management Act impact fees on or denial of new development will not be used as a measure to prevent s • - - 1 S t reduced level of service standards are deemed unacceptable to Port Angeles School District No. 121. Clailam County. and City of Port Anaeles. 9.. 1 -50 REPORT 07 TB3 BCE00L COBCURRENCT TREK FORCE (2/3/95) The School Concurrency Task Force is comprised of elected officials from the City of Port Angeles, Clallam County, and the Port Angeles School District No. 121, a Port Angeles Planning Commissioner, a representative of the Port Angeles development community, and two citizens at large. They are City Councilmember Cathy McKeown (Chair), County Commissioner Dorothy Duncan, Port Angeles School Board Member Margaret Crawford, Port Angeles Planning Commissioner Orville Campbell, Development Community representative Jim Reed, and Port Angeles Downtown Association Executive Director Barry Berezowski. The Task Force met four times in 1994 on September 15th, October 13th, November 10th, and December 15th. After reviewing information regarding how other local governments had implemented requirements similar to school concurrency and what school facilities planning had been done by School District No. 121, the Task Force arrived at the following consensus. By adopting this school concurrency recommendation, the School Concurrency Task Force is deciding which jurisdictions will take the lead on planning new school facilities. Without school Concurrency, the fear is that the City /County forces the School District to find capacity when future growth occurs. With school concurrency, the fear is that the School District forces the City /County to deny development when capacity is inadequate. Neither of these fears is necessarily true. What this school concurrency recommendation does is to force the City /County and the School District to plan capacity cooperatively. It does not give the lead to any of the jurisdictions and requires them to work together. The following recommendation of the School Concurrency Task Force is to approve school concurrency requirements for new school facilities planning but clearly eliminate the possibilities of imposing impact fees or denying new development when school capacity is not available. In such circumstances where level of service standards cannot be met, the school concurrency policy will require that either the demand for new facilities will be reduced (i.e., year round use of schools or matching grade bands to facility capacities) or the level of service standard will be reduced to the available capacity. Affordable Schools Approach Step 1 The School District plans to house future growth. Step 2 The School District plans to finance new facilities to house future growth. Step 3 The City and the County must adopt concurrency management ordinances that include adequate school 151 3De T capacity (i.e., meeting required level of service standards) within six years of development. Step 4 If capacity is inadequate to house students at the required level of service standard and adequate school funding is not available, then the demand for new facilities will be reduced (i.e., year round use of schools or matching grade bands to facility capacities) or the level of service standard will be reduced to keep both schools and housing development affordable to the majority of Port Angeles School District residents. Step 5 Imposition of Growth Management Act impact fees on or denial of new development will not be used as a measure to prevent further degradation of school services, unless the reduced level of service standard is deemed unacceptable to all three jurisdictions (the School District, the City, and the County). Step 6 At the time Comprehensive Plans for the City and the County are reviewed, one representative from each of the three jurisdictions shall meet to consider possible recommendations for amendment of these policies affecting school facilities. This consensus was based on two points of agreement. First, that coordinating school planning between the School District, the county, and the City is sound decision making, since the actions.of one jurisdiction affect the actions of the other jurisdictions. Second, impact fees and development denials can adversely affect the affordability of housing. Although other school concurrency policy options were considered, they did not satisfy both of these two points of agreement. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the School Concurrency Task Force for the City, the County, and the School District to mutually adopt the following affordable schools policy. Based on the School District plans to house future growth and to finance new facilities for this growth, the City and the County shall adopt or amend concurrency management ordinances to include adequate school capacity (i.e., meeting required level of service standards) within six years of development. If capacity is inadequate to house students at the required level of service standard and adequate school funding is not available, then the demand for new facilities will be reduced (i.e., year round use of schools or matching grade bands to facility capacities) or the level of service standard will be reduced to keep both schools and housing development affordable to the majority of Port Angeles School District residents. 309 Imposition of impact tees on or denial of new development will not be used as a measure to prevent further degradation of school services, unless the reduced level of service standard is deemed unacceptable to all three jurisdictions (the School District, the City, and the County). 153 310 154 Port Angeles � bl' c Schools City Council Members City of Pon Angeles 321 East 5th Street Port Angeles. WA 98362 Council Members: Office of the Superintendent 216 East Fourth Street Port Angeles. WA 98362 13601 457 -8575 FAX 13601457 -4649 January 31, 1995 V At a special meting on January 31, 1995 the school directors of the Po Angeles School District discussed the work of the Concurrency Task Force. The basis of this discussion was a document prepared by the Task Force entitled " Concurrency for Schools." In response to this document, reflecting the work of the Task Force, the Board would like to share a number of items. First, we are pleased that the City of Port Angeles recognizes the importance of schools. The existence of the Task Force acknowledges a desire to continue a discussion about the impact of growth on schools for the futur ile the language in the ort does not address the District's needs. as presented to the Task orcei, a Council and the Pl g armin Co thr • s, at least schools have not been forgotten all together. Commission during the 1 It must also be recognized that the school district is not willing to, under any circ relinquish any rights afforded the school district under SEPA, RCW 58.17.110 e statutory n • avai .. o e s istnct now or resulting from future legislation. These rights are preserved and may be acted on in the future by the Port .Angeles School District. No action of the City Council should be construed in any way to alter or minimize these rights. • The Board acknowledges that the position stated in the Task Force report is one of compromise. We appreciate the willingness of County and City government to work cooperatively with the school district. We sincerely hope that the progress of time will produce continued discussion About the impacts of growth on schools. We also understand that the door for reconsideration will remain open. KS:ct Ken Schermer, President Board of Directors Art r!llnr.atn•e . -- - 3// 156 CITY OF PORT ANGELES AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendments 1995 I, SUE ROBERDS being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of the United States of America over the age of 21 years; that I am competent to be a witness herein; that on the 21_ day of May,, 1995, I posted said notice, a true copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof pursuant to Article XI, Section 14, 2(a) of Ordinance #1709, as amended, on the City Hall bulletin board, County Courthouse and main Library branch. Subscribed to me this _5/411 day of AFFIANTJ ,6,00(2). . Q NOTARY LI or the State of MOF Washingto , residing in Port ? -o '� Angeles . . 1995. 157 I CITY OF PORT ANGELES CONCURRENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the PORT ANGELES CITY PLANNING COMMISSION will hold a public hearing on JUNE 14,1995, at 7 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, at 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, Washington, to consider the following AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN as described below. This review is required on a yearly basis per City Ordinance. ADDITIONALLY, the PORT ANGELES CITY couNaL will hold a public hearing on JUNE 20,1995, on the proposaL The meetings will begin at 7 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, at City Hall, 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, Washington. 1.) Proposed Area -Wide Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Changes Area l Land Use New LU $ 8th & Race CH/CO LDR/OS C Commercial should bisect Open Space along 8th not vice versa (generalized mapping error) Water & Jones CO LDR C unintentional land use change (generalized mapping erns) Tumwater PBP I OS unintentional land use change (generalized & 4th mapping error) 8th & H CSD HDR C planned development and policy to retain commercial option 8th & G RHD LDR HDR unintentional land use change ( generalized nzIPPmg) 1 18th & D RS-7 MDR C & 18th RHD MDR C Extension RHD MDR Pine & RHD MDR Lauridsen Melody Lane RHD MDR Wabash & RS -9 MDR Eckard LDR HDR HDR policy to retain low density residential existing development existing development HDR existing development HDR/LDR existing and planned development LDR existing development *Zoning Kev: RHD - Residential High Density; CN - Commercial Neighborhood; CO - Commercial Office PBP - Public Buildings and Parks; CSD - Commercial Shopping District ; RS -7 and RS -9, Residential Single Family. *Land Use Kev: LDR - Low Density Residential; MDR - Medium Density Residential; HDR - High Density Residential; OS- Open Space; C - Commercial; I - Industrial. 2.) A dxange in wording is proposed to the Capital Facilities Element Policy B.3 by adding "potable" before "water service" and by replacing "ISO guidelines" with "Uniform Fire Code ". A change is proposed to Policy B.5 by replacing "120/220 volts per service" with "118 volts (120 volt base) ". 3.) Proposed School Concurrency Policy changes as follows: Add "schools" to Capital Facilities Element Policy A.11. Replace the Capital Facilities Element Objective A.1 with the following wording: "1. At the time hensive Pl recommendations for amendment of policies affecting school facilities." Add the following new paragraph to the end of the Capital Facilities Element Policy C.1: "1. If capacity 1 :. -. "I • . ._ 1l__• - !1- bli h -• l— 1 • - 1 d h •• i_11 • u • f will :u..• I• ' vs. I_ • n1,11 -5.11• .J�i..�i ' ;'1 .._.L. - •1 •L 1 • f s1s•�- ��. 1.L • *ILL* 1_:.y 1• will ., •, • •• :AL.• • •1 1.111 • • 9L. •1 0/111,...:1111 :_� 11111, • _t, SL •111% • •111 i_!.'t ! • • 1j -7.1 « l ^1 • -"•-. • I •1l I 11.0Xa_! U -!L. ' {wll:�ii .'1 !!l!. •.�« •li •i • 2L: • • tiL' •J•JILt5! .1 1 �'_1S • • itiL -i!L L!! 1_ • -1,411, _•_..1.1 •1! • • • •1f1 •• • 15_ _L -IA • - •fll. 1•.i1 • •i1u •!1 159 ' _rn _. n_�= 57'1!x' l ! 6.iI t' 17/ ^ w '� L 1!J IC.. • n .1 nib •II • !�� APPLICANT: Ct1Y OF PORT ANGELES LOCATION: City -wide STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA): The City issued a Determination of Nat:- Significance ( DNS) and Adoption of Existing Environmental Doaanrat for this review on May 30, 1995. Appeal of the decision must be submitted in writing to the Planning Department, 321 East Fifth Street, Poet Angeles, WA, 98362, no later than June 9, 1995. Appeals mast be factual. All interested parties are encouraged to appear at the hearing at City Hall and express their opinion on the proposal. Pertinent information, including site maps may be_ reviewed at the City Planning Department prior to the hearing date. City Hall is accessible for persons with disabilities. Please let us know if you will need any special accommodations to attend the meeting. Sue Roberds, Planning Office Specialist WARMNG: The removal, mutilation, destruction or concealment of this notice is a misdemeanor, punishable by fine and imprisonment. PUB: MAMAS POST: O15 Summaries of Ordinances Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council on June 20. 1995 Ordinance No. 2871 This Ordinance of the City of Port Angeles revises water rates and amends Ordinance No. 2181, as amended, and Chapter 13.44 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. Ordinance No. 2872 This Ordinance of the City of Port Angeles revises rates for wastewater service and amends Chapter VI of Ordinance No. 2394, as amended, and Chapter 13.65 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. Ordinance No. 2873 This Ordinance of the City of Port Angeles amends the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Capital Facilities Element and amends Ordinance 2818. The full texts of the Ordinances are available at City Hall in the City Clerk's office or will be mailed upon request. Office hours are Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. These Ordinances shall take effect five days after the date of publication of these summaries. Publish: June 25. 1995 Becky J. Upton City Clerk