Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 01/05/1993 2396 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Port Angeles, Washington January 5, 1993 CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Hallett called the special meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order SPECIAL MEETING: at 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mayor Hallett, Councilmen Braun, Nicholson, and Ostrowski (arrived at 6:10 p. m. ), Councilwoman Sargent, and Councilmen Schueler and Wight. Members Absent: None. Staff Present: Manager Pomeranz, Attorney Knutson, Clerk Upton, S. Brodhun, B. Collins, L. Glenn, K. Godbey, S. Ilk, J. Pittis, B. Titus, B. Jones, G. Kenworthy, B. Coons, L. Meyer, B. Henderson, S. Hursh, D. Heassler, and K. Ridout. Public Present: B. Haselton, M. Robuck, J. Robuck, M. Robuck, R. Plaske, K. Plaske, J. Russell, M. Russell, J. Smilay. B. Petzoldt, M. Petzoldt, A. Dunker, J. McCaski, K. Ellefson, P. Predovich, M. Predovich, A. Nielsen, R. Nielsen, B. Smith, L. Smith, A. Bentley, M. Hams, R. Anderson, B. Johnson, J. Huston, T. McKeown, I. McKeown, P. Beck, T. German. EXECUTIVE Mayor Hallett adjourned the meeting to Executive Session at 6:06 p.m. to discuss SESSION: matters of litigation, real estate, and union negotiations for approximately 20 minutes. The meeting reconvened at 6:40 p.m. Landfill Issues Landfill Issues Public Works Director Pittis and Solid Waste Superintendent Jones briefly reviewed certain portions of the Solid Waste Comprehensive Plan which, by State law, is the primary responsibility of the County. They reviewed the major issues addressed in the Plan, such as landfilling, composting, recycling, and options which might be incorporated should the situation in the City or County change. It was noted the DOE is more amenable to changes to the Plan which might come about due to changes in technology. Also reviewed were issues pertinent to the various permits which must be obtained in conjunction with the landfill. The construction schedule Was summarized as well. Lengthy discussion was held concerning the FAA position on the closure of the landfill in five years, and the question was raised by the Mayor as to how the city can mitigate a problem that doesn't even exist. Certain problems are created for the City by virtue of the FAA position, such as the non-rating of the bond. This ultimately results in the City and its residents paying more money. In considering the authority of the Federal Aviation Administration in the closure of the landfill, Attorney Knutson clarified that the FAA has direct authority over the airport. Landfill regulations established by DOE and EPA defer to the FAA when landfills are constructed within certain distances from airports. Attorney Knutson continued that the City is confident it can be proven that the landfill does not cause a bird problem, and the best course of action for now is to cooperate with the agencies and attempt to prove that case without litigation. In the ongoing discussion, Director Pittis pointed out certain precedents have been set where other municipalities have been in a similar situation and have been able to sufficiently prove their cases. The Council took the overall position of wishing to say "no" to the FAA; the issue might need to be resolved in court. Additionally, the opinion was expressed that the public should be fully advised as to why the costs are much higher than originally anticipated. Manager Pomeranz noted it is difficult to determine the exact costs as this time. In that this issue will be discussed further at -1- 2397 CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 5, 1993 Landfill Issues the next Utility Advisory Committee meeting, Mayor Hallett asked that staff be (Cont'd) prepared to discuss the costs associated with the FAA ruling, as well as the cost differential in terms of amortizing the bonds over five versus twenty years. He asked that the cost associated with a non-rated bond be included as well. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Hallett called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order REGULAR MEETING: at 7:25 p.m. PLEDGE OF The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Louise Meyer, who was recognized ALLEGIANCE: on the occasion of her retirement from the City as of this date. APPROVAL OF Councilman Braun moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of MINUTES: December 15, 1992. Councilman Wight seconded the motion. Councilman Schueler referenced page 3, PC Bids, and asked that the words, "price bid", be changed to read, "bid price". A vote was taken on the motion which carried unanimously. CEREMONIAL Employee Suggestion Awards to Steve Hursh, Light Department, and Denise MATTERS/ Heassler, Police Department PROCLAMATIONS: Mayor Hallett presented Employee Suggestion Awards to Steve Hursh of the Light Department and Denise Heassler of the Police Department. CITY COUNCIL Councilman Schueler reported on a meeting he attended today regarding the City COMMITTEE employees medical insurance for next year's contract. It was very informative. REPORTS: FINANCE: None. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Ostrowski moved to accept the Consent Agenda, including: (1) Authorization of completion of contract CL92-4R with Asplundh Tree Expert Company; (2) Landfill contract 2B - Change orders//3 and//4; (3) Correspondence from Washington State Liquor Control Board; (4) January 5 Claims Approval list memo; (5) Payroll for December 20, 1992 of $329,882.86. Added to the Consent Agenda was the Voucher List of $2,440,061.44. Councilman Wight seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. ITEMS FROM THE Added to the agenda was a discussion on Gambling Taxes as Item F.7., and AUDIENCE/COUNCIL/ discussion on communications with the County on an annexation request as Item F. 8. STAFF TO BE CONSIDERED OR Art Dunker, 2114 W. Sixth Street, representing the North Peninsula Homebuilders PLACED ON A Association, read a letter into the record thanking the Council, Planning FUTURE AGENDA: Commission, and Planning and Public Works staff for working with the Association on the clearing, grading, and filling ordinance. Mr. Dunker asked that the Council assure a mandated review after one year. Larry Leonard, 1030 Olympus, wanted to thank Council for its stand on the FAA matter. Additionally, he supported a one or two-year review of the clearing, - grading, and filling ordinance. LEGISLATION: A. Public Hearings Public Hearings 1. Rezone Request Rezone Request - REZ 91(12)05 - ANDERSON, Northwest corner of 12th and °'0" Streets: Anderson Request for rezone of approximately 4 + acres from Residential Single- Family to Residential Mediutn Density. Mayor Hallett reviewed the information provided by the Planning Department and asked staff to summarize the request. Planning Director Collins displayed an overhead map of the proposed rezone area and reviewed the substandard streets in the immediate area. He noted a public hearing was held on December 9 by the 2398 CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 5, 1993 LEGISLATION: Planning Commission with the subsequent recommendation for denial of the request. (Cont'd) The Planning Department recommends that the Council concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Director Collins directed the Rezone Request - Council's attention to a letter submitted, for the record, by Christopher R. Crowson. Anderson (Cont'd) Mayor Hallett opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Rick Anderson, 618 S. Peabody Street, owner of LBR Construction, explained the need for affordable housing and the difficulty in finding appropriate land for this type of housing. Mr. Anderson feels many areas and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan are met with the proposed rezone. He offered several solutions to help remedy the development problems of 12th Street. He suggested an LID be formed with property owners to the north paying for improvements to 12th Street. He also suggested a Municipal Bond Program or, perhaps, a latecomers ordinance. Mr. Anderson requested that Council approve the rezone conditioned upon 12th Street being completed to City standards before any building permits are filed. John Huston, 2438 W. 12th Street, referenced a letter and petition containing 134 signatures opposing the rezoning. Mr. Huston pointed out that their area was already high density, as the maps used tonight do not show about 35 homes which have been recently constructed. Mr. Huston opined that the streets would not be sufficient for heavy traffic, and there would be safety concerns. Ida McKeown, 2510 W. Tenth Street, expressed concern about an already existing drainage problem which may be worsened on her property if the rezone and subsequent housing is approved. Bill Johnson, 2424 W. 12th Street, pointed out that medium density allows the building of duplexes and multi-family homes. Landlords usually will charge as much rent as they can; therefore, affordable housing and duplexes for rent are not necessarily the same. Larry Leonard, 1030 Olympus, reported that he was one of the two Commissioners who voted against the denial of the rezone request. He indicated that one of the reasons housing has been so expensive in Port Angeles is due to the lack of available space on which to build. Mr. Leonard pointed out that zoning changes are allowable, and just because an individual purchases a home in a RS-9 area, it doesn't mean that zoning will be retained. He and Mr. Anderson are aware of the problems with the streets being inadequate for heavier traffic conditions, and this issue can and will be addressed if the rezone is approved. Councilman Schueler questioned how City Staff could plan for future infrastructure development, unless there is something definitive going on. Do you develop the street hoping someone will come in and develop it into something that will increase density? Councilman Nicholson pointed out there should be a system in place to develop the street. If such were the case, he would be more inclined to support the rezone. Mr. Leonard pointed out that no building can be accomplished until the streets are developed; therefore, there is no reason to deny the rezone. Bob Smith, 620 Milwaukee Drive, felt it is incumbent on the leaders of the community to protect the property value of those who have invested in the area. It's possible that this rezoning issue will devaluate the property of those people who live along 12th Street. He also expressed concern with the anticipated increase in traffic. Joe Robuck, 2508 W. Tenth Street, owns property on the west side of the proposed rezone. He doesn't feel it is right to rezone without a plan. If a street is going to be paved he would like to see '0" St. and Tenth St. paved. That would be to his advantage. Duplexes and apartments are not needed until streets are developed that can carry the traffic they would generate. Mayor Hallett asked if an LID would be desired by Mr. Robuck and his neighbors; Mr. Robuck indicated it was a good idea, but 10th Street is also in need of being paved. Mayor Hallett closed the public hearing at 8:21 p.m., however, another citizen indicated his desire to speak. Therefore, the Mayor reopened the public hearing. Mark Predovich, 1414 S. "O' St., wished to echo the concerns of his neighbors regarding the traffic and safety of the children. Right now, on the south end of Street there is a development proceeding, wherein 32 homes will go into the area. He questions the term medium density or high density, from a standpoint of whether duplex housing really is the answer for affordable homes. Efforts to formulate an LID on "O" St. previously failed. -3- 2399 CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 5, 1993 LEGISLATION: Mayor Hallett closed the public hearing at 8:25 p.m. (Cont'd) Councilman Schueler felt it is inappropriate to reject a request to build smaller, less Rezone Request - costly homes because of immediate neighborhood concerns. Mayor Hallett asked if Anderson (Cont'd) availability and affordability were not issues, what would be a reason for the Council to consider taking property from RS-9 to RMD. Director Collins responded two factors should be considered: 1) Location - is this property situated in close proximity to locations where more intensive uses should occur, i.e. arterials, schools, shopping, bus lines, etc.; and 2) What land is available for those various uses within the City. Is there more RS-9 land and less RMD land? Is this a good location or are there better locations? Mayor Hallett asked if it was the City's responsibility to protect property value, and if so, who is the City protecting it for or protecting it from? Director Collins felt one of the primary purposes for zoning is to protect property values. He felt the Comprehensive Plan, in dealing with residential issues, does not pit one type of residential land use against another. Councilman Wight pointed out that when the City annexes land, it automatically zones that land RS-9, which is the most restrictive zone. It limits the property owners ability to use the land with the most specific restrictions on what they can do. The only thing one can do with RS-9 land is build a single family home that occupies 30% or less of the total lot coverage. He discussed the pros and cons of this rezone. Councilwoman Sargent moved to recommend denial of the rezone, citing the following Findings and Conclusions: Findings: (1) The request is to rezone about 4.5 from single family residential (R$-9) to Residential Medium Density (RMD); (2) The site is designated suburban residential by the Comprehensive Plan which encourages single family development on lots ranging in size from 9,000-14,000 square feet; (3) The goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan have been considered in this review. Those found most relevant include Goals Nos. 3 & 5; Residential Policies Nos. 2, 4, 5, 7, 15, 16-19; Circulation Policy No. I; Urban Design Policy No. 4; Social Objectives Nos. 1-3; and Land Use Objectives Nos. 1, 2, 4, 6 & 7; (4) The site fronts on 12th Street. The 1100 lineal feet of 12th Street from "N" Street to the west end of the site is improved to a half width. The right- of-way is substandard (35 feet wide) for 1000 lineal feet for that stretch; (5) There are no areas zoned multi-family residential (RMD or RHD) in the suburban environment west of "I" Street; (6) The south side of 12th Street is developed with single family homes on lots 9,000 s.f. and larger. The north side of the street is mostly undeveloped with an occasional single family home; (7) A Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance was issued by the City of Port Angeles SEPA Responsible Official on November 27, 1992; and (8) The RMD zone allows single family residential development on 7,000 s.f. lots; and Conclusions: (A) The proposal is inconsistent with Residential Policy No. 16 which encourages multi- family development to be located functionally close to arterials; inconsistent with Residential Policy No. 5 which encourages street improvements be available to support the development; and is may be inconsistent with the policies relating to the suburban residential environment and preservation of neighborhood character; (B) Circumstances have not changed in the immediate vicinity to indicate that RMD zoning is more appropriate than the existing RS-9 zoning. The area has been developed as a large lot single family neighborhood; and (C) The rezone without a Planned Residential Development does not ensure that the development of the site will be compatible with the existing neighborhood. The motion was seconded by Councilman Braun. Director Collins noted a correction to Conclusion A, where the words, "may be" should be deleted. The correction was so noted. Lengthy discussion ensued concerning the merits of the rezone request. Councilman Wight noted that, disregarding infrastructure problems, this area of town is single- family and relatively low density. It can, therefore, assimilate some smaller enclaves of higher density housing without materially degrading the quality of life for the people who live there now. This issue must be addressed once the infrastructure problems have been solved. After further discussion, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried 5 - 2, with Mayor Hallett and Councilman Schueler voting in opposition. Break Mayor Hallett recessed the meeting for a break at 9:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:16 p.m. -4- [ 2400 CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 5, 1993 LEGISLATION: B. Ordinances not requiring a public hearing (Cont'd) 1. Amendment to Ordinance 2729 - Solid waste fees Amendment to Ordinance 2729 - Solid Waste Fees - Mayor Hallett reviewed the information provided by Finance Director Godbey. He Ordinance No. 2733 then read the Ordinance by title, entitled ORDINANCE NO. 2733 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles amending solid waste rates and amending Ordinance No. 2317, as amended, and Chapter 13.54 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. Councilman Nicholson moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. Councilman Wight seconded the motion which, after limited discussion, carried unanimously. Clearing, Grading, Filling 2. Clearing, grading, filling ordinance, fee resolution and engineering Ordinance, Fee Resolution standards and Engineering Standards Ordinance No. 2734 Mayor Hallett reviewed the information provided by Public Works. He then read the Ordinance by title, entitled ORDINANCE NO. 2734 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles establishing regulations pertaining to clearing, grading, filling and drainage in the City of Port Angeles and creating Chapter 15.28 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. Councilman Wight moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title, with the provision that the Ordinance be scheduled for review the first quarter of 1994. Councilwoman Sargent seconded the motion. Brief discussion followed concerning the exemption of land one acre or less and the fact that this exemption received the support of the Homebuilders Association. Because this exemption may make the Ordinance appear to be somewhat ineffective, staff recommended the one-year review. Areas being cleared/graded with no building permit may "fall through the cracks". Additionally, Public Works Director Pittis referenced the issue of what is to happen with the Puget Sound Water Quality Manual and the need to adopt that document or one of equal intent in 1994, a matter which makes the one-year review even more timely. A vote was taken and the motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 1-93 Mayor Hallett read the Resolution by title, entitled RESOLUTION NO. 1-93 A RESOLUTION of the City of Port Angeles establishing fees for Permits, plan review and inspection of clearing, grading, filling and drainage activities. Councilwoman Sargent moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. Councilman Braun seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Amendment to Parking 3. Memo from the City Attorney to City Council regarding amendments to the Ordinance - parking ordinance. Ordinance No. 2735 Mayor Hallett reviewed the information provided by the City Attorney. He read the Ordinance by title, entitled ORDINANCE NO. 2735 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, amending the Parking Ordinance to reflect the changes in State law and holiday parking enforcement dates and to -5- 2401 CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 5, 1993 LEGISLATION: increase parking fines, amending Ordinance (Cont'd) No. 2451 and Chapter 10.20 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code and repealing Amendment to Parking Ordinance No. 2728. Ordinance - Ordinance No. 2735 Councilman Braun moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. (Cont'd) Councilman Wight seconded the motion. Councilman Wight asked that the words, "4th of July' be changed to Independence Day, to which all agreed. Councilwoman Sargent asked that the Downtown Association make it known to the public the amount of free parking be made available on holidays. A vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously. Risk Management 4. Risk management Ordinance Ordinance - - Ordinance No. 2736 Mayor Hallett reviewed the information provided and read the Ordinance by title, entitled ORDINANCE NO. 2736 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, establishing a risk management and safety program, specifying policies and procedures therefor, and creating a new Chapter 2.68 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. Councilman Ostrowski moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. Councilman Braun seconded the motion. After brief discussion, a vote was taken on the motion which carried unanimously. Public Nuisance C. Resolutions requiring public comment 1. Public Nuisance Public Works Director Pittis reported that no action was required on this agenda item, as the public nuisance has been resolved. Martin Luther King Day - D. Resolutions not requiring public hearings Resolution No. 2-93 1. Martin Luther King Day Mayor Hallett read the Resolution by title, entitled RESOLUTION NO. 2-93 A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, providing for the observance of Martin Luther King Day. Councilwoman Sargent moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. Councilman Braun seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Planning Commission E. Planning Commission Minutes/Action Items Minutes Planning Commission Minutes of December 16, 1992 There being no action required by the Council at this time, Councilman Braun moved to accept the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of December 16, 1992. Councilwoman Sargent seconded the motion. A vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously. Certification of Tax Levies F. Other Considerations 1. Certification of Tax Levies Mayor Hallett reviewed information provided by Finance Director Kay Godbey. 2402 CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 5, 1993 LEGISLATION: Councilwoman Sargent moved to establish the levies as set forth in the (Cont'd) memorandum. Councilman Braun seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Certification of Tax Levies (Cont'd) City Council Committee 2. City Council Committee Assignments Assignments Councilwoman Sargent noted she is participating in the Peninsula Development Association. Councilman Braun requested that he be removed from the ITT Rayonier Environmental Committee, as staff has agreed to represent the City. There was a brief discussion on the Revolving Loan Fund Review Board, which Manager Pomeranz hopes to reinstate this year. Several committees were stricken from the list, as they are no longer meeting. An Information Systems Steering Committee meeting was scheduled for January 20, 1993. Extend Meeting Beyond Councilwoman Sargent moved to continue the meeting beyond 10:00 p.m. 10:00 p.m. Councilman Schueler seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. City Representative to 3. Reappointment of City representative to Clallam County Fair Advisory Clallam County Fair Board Advisory Board Mayor Hallett reviewed the information submitted by the City Clerk concerning the reappointment of Ronald Jad~sohn as the City representative to the Clallam County Fair Advisory Board. Councilman Ostrowski moved to recommend the reappointment of Mr. Jadasohn to the Fair Advisory Board for a four-year tenn. Councilman Nicholson seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Interlocal Agreement for 4. lnterlocal Agreement for Airport Road Realignment project Airport Road Realignment Project Mayor Hallett reviewed the information provided by Public Works. Councilman Nicholson moved to approve the Agreement and authorize the Mayor's signature. Councilwoman Sargent seconded the motion. In the ensuing discussion, Public Works Director Pittis advised the Council that a WSDOT grant should cover approximately $87,000 of the City's share of the expenses, with the remainder of the funding coming from the Real Estate Excise Tax. A vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously. Green River Ordinance 5. Green River Ordinance Mayor Hallett reviewed information submitted by the City Attorney concerning the Green River Ordinance. Prohibiting door-to-door commercial solicitation has been determined by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to violate the First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech. The issue to be considered is how the City may wish to amend its Peddlers Ordinance to make it consistent with Federal law. Three options were given to the Council as ways to deal with door-to- door solicitation. Lengthy discussion followed, and the suggestion was made to incorporate Options 1 and 2, which would prohibit commercial solicitation where residents have posted "no commercial solicitation" signs or have registered with the City as not wanting commercial solicitation at their residences. Attorney Knutson, in responding to various questions, clarified that the Ordinance still requires a license for commercial solicitation and that charitable and religious solicitations are allowed under another ordinance. Councilman Schueler expressed the opinion that the City is again being told how to conduct its business when a problem doesn't even exist. Attorney Knutson cautioned that, if the City continues to enforce the Green River Ordinance, there could be litigation under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act. If the case were lost, attorney fees as well as punitive damages might have to be paid. Councilman Wight moved to ask staff to provide a draft ordinance for Council consideration which would make it legal for the combination of Options 1 and 2. Councilwoman Sargent seconded the motion. Councilwoman Sargent expressed concern that an administrative burden would be created, and she inquired as to whether a simple approach could be initiated. Police Chief Ilk indicated a -7- 2403 CiTY COUNCIL MEETING January 5, 1993 LEGISLATION: registry would create a lot of administrative handling and it would change on a (Cont'd) regular basis. The list would probably not be valid after a period of a few months. Lengthy discussion followed concerning the merits of the options and the most Green River Ordinance preferable means of accomplishing the goals. Councilman Wight indicated the issue (Cont'd) may easily become over complicated. If a citizen wants to be placed on a register, it should become the citizen's responsibility to keep the list/register updated. Citizens can also place signs on the door if they do not wish to be bothered by solicitors. Chief Ilk expressed concern about distributing a list of names and addresses of citizens to peddlers. License requirements were discussed, and the suggestion made that these might be made more stringent. The Council asked for an indication of staff preferences, all of which proved to vary. Lengthy discussion again followed and Councilman Wight opted to withdraw his motion. Councilman Schueler moved to ignore this entire issue for the moment. Councilman Braun seconded the motion. The motion was - then withdrawn by Councilman Schueler. The Council asked that the City Attorney contact the AWC in order to ascertain if there are other options available. Peninsula Regional 6. Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization airport policy Transportation Planning Organization Airport Director Collins explained the proposed policy to the Council, action on which will Policy be taken by the 15th. Some of the language of the policy needs to be changed due to the current situation with the FAA. Public Works Director Pittis addressed comments to Goal 3, Policy 3, and suggested the last sentence be deleted. In addition, regarding Goal 3, Policy 4, he suggested "and immediate vicinity" be inserted in the paragraph following the words, "Ensure that developments in the airport approach area (safety zone) ...". Councilman Ostrowski will meet with Staff to improve the wording of the policy. Gambling Taxes 7. Gambling Taxes Manager Pomeranz reminded the Council that taxes on gambling were raised during the budget process. The increase on punchboards and pulltabs went from 3 % to 4 % and will yield a revenue of approximately $20,000.00. Several phone calls and one letter from taverns/bowling alley owners expressing concern about this increase were received. Staff can either send a letter thanking them for their input and letting them know that the Council's position is that the fee increase is to remain in place, or meet with them to discuss the issue. Councilwoman Sargent favored a meeting, and Mayor Hallett offered to meet with Manager Pomeranz and the tavern/bowling alley owners to address this issue. Rockford/Andrew 8. Rockford/Andrew Annexation Annexation Planning Director Collins indicated that, at its December 18, 1992 meeting, the Council approved a motion of intent to annex the subject property. The County has requested Boundary Review Board review because of concern with the shape of the land to be annexed and confusion over where the City limits began and ended. A letter will be sent to County Commissioners stating the facts of the annexation and requesting County support in the annexation. Councilman Wight moved that the Mayor sign the above referenced letter. Councilman Nicholson seconded the motion. A brief discussion was held - concerning the Boundary Review Board after which time a vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned~. Clerk q --~] -8-