Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 05/05/1987I CALL TO ORDER Mayor Whidden called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. II ROLL CALL Members Present: Mayor Whidden, Councilmen Hallett, Hesla, McPhee, Quast, Schermer, Stamon. Members Absent: Staff Present: Public Present: III MINUTES Councilman Schermer moved to accept and place on file the minutes of the April 21, 1987, City Council meeting. Councilman Hallett seconded. Councilman Hesla corrected Register Page 728, paragraph 2, Councilman Hesla announced that the clean up of Ediz Hook was scheduled to begin.... On call for the question, the motion to accept the minutes as amended, carried. Councilman Quast mentioned for tonight's record that the meeting of the Utility Advisory Committee had been rescheduled from April 27, to May 4, 1987. IV FINANCE None. CITY COUNCIL MEETING Port Angeles, Washington May 5, 1987 Manager Flodstrom, Attorney Knutson, Clerk Anderson, P. Carr, B. Myers, R. Orton, S. Brodhun, L. Glenn, J. Pittis, T. Smith, A. Rose. G. Holmquist, J. Holmquist, J. Jacobs, E. Hargreaves, N. Boyse, C. Rochelean, M. Rogers, E. McElravy, E. Fisher, S. Fisher, L. Leonard, A. Leonard, R. Kuebel, E. Kuebel, R. Womac, H. Berglund, J. Didrickson, J. Didrickson, R. Luedeke, S. Teichert, J. Teichert, Mr. Mrs. C. Alexander, Mr. Mrs. L. Johbois, G. Doyle, V. Rogers, M. Raymond, J. Johnson. 1. Bids Awarded for Traffic Paint and Pavement Tapes Councilman Hallett moved to concur with the Public Works Recommendation and award bids as follows: For traffic paint, Norris Paint Company in the amount of $6,397.25 and for pavement tapes to Traffic Safety Supply Company in the amount of $4,001.40. Councilman Stamon seconded. Upon inquiry, Public Works Director Pittis explained that both firms were located in the Seattle area. On call for the question, the motion carried. 2. Bid Awards for Vehicle and Equipment Councilman Schermer moved to accept the recommendation of Administrative Services and award bids as follows: Bid #B -1A, to Sea -Tac Ford in the amount of $49,058.89 (including tax); Bid #B -1B to Frank Amadon Co. in the amount of $14,219.90 (including tax); and Bid #B -3 to Turf Equipment Northwest, Inc. in the amount of $28,880.28 (including tax). Councilman Quast seconded pointing out that these bids did include tax. Councilman Hallett noted for the record that the bids were being awarded, not necessarily to the lowest bidder but to the lowest responsive bidder as exceptions had been taken to bid specifications eliminating two bidders. On call for the question, the motion carried. 3. Riddell, Williams Payment Authorized Councilman Quast moved to approve payment of the April 16, 1987, Riddell, Williams bill in the amount of $1,939.27. Councilman Stamon seconded. Councilman Quast thanked Attorney Knutson for providing an updated total on expenditures for WPPSS litigation. He stated that to date the City had paid $496,685.07 coming out of a fateful decision by the Council in 1976 when Council was persuaded by BPA that we would have brown outs and black outs and BPA could no longer provide our city with power if the city would not join the WPPSS consortium in building five nuclear power plants. 729 7 3 0 CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 5, 1987 Councilman Stamon pointed out that had we not been for paying for this representation, the City stood to incur liabilities in millions of dollars. On call for the question, the motion carried. V CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Schermer moved to accept the items listed under the Consent Agenda as follows: (1) Request permission to call for bids on Cemetery Shop replacement; (2) Request for progress payment to Fremont Construction of $425,779.00 for construction of City Hall /VBMCC; (3) Vouchers of $1,828,138.86; and (4) Payroll of 4 -19 -87 of $236,261.53. Councilman Hesla seconded. Councilman Hallett discussed with staff the status of the "E" Street Reservoir cover project being completed by Gardner Engineers. On call for the question, the motion carried. VI ITEMS FROM THE AUDIENCE TO BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA None. VII LEGISLATION 1. Presentation of "Plaque of Appreciation" to Mr. William Wallace Mayor Whidden presented the plaque to Mr. Wallace for his generous contribution of the ZOLL external pacemaker to the Port Angeles Medic One Program. Mr. Wallace accepted the award stating that he especially wanted to thank the paramedic crews because except for one of those crews he would not be here tonight. 2. Yard of the Month Awards for May, 1987 Mayor Whidden presented Yard of the Month awards to the following: Jim Elizabeth Hargreaves, 310 West Third; John Sylvia Teichert, 1713 East Fourth; and Conrad Doris Hagberg, 606 E. Lauridsen. Other recipients, who were not present at the meeting were; Richard Christine Thomas, 1235 West 18th; and Ed Peg Adamich, 121 Columbus. Neighborhood of the Month awards were presented to residents of the 700 block of East llth Street as follows: Charles Nancy Boyse, 701 E. llth; Don Helen Bailey, 711 E. llth; Bruce Ruth Womac, 717 E. llth; Bruce Ursula Newsham, 719 E. llth; Clair Ann Newell, 727 E. llth; Jon Jana Didrickson, 731 E. llth; and Louise C. Garrow, 735 E. llth. 3. Public Hearings A. Port Angeles Telecable Franchise Renewal Request Mayor Whidden opened the public hearing and asked for comments from the public. Councilman Hallett outlined the procedure stating that following tonight's public hearing an Ordinance would be drafted which would hopefully include the concerns of the public as expressed tonight. He stated a second public hearing would then be scheduled for either June 17th, or July 7, 1987, and final action would be taken at that time. Craig Miller, Attorney representing Port Angeles Telecable, addressed the Council introducing Vern Kiele, Manager, Ernie Candell, President of the Board of Directors, and Leroy Sproat, Engineer. Mr. Miller stated that Port Angeles Telecable desires that the franchise be made consistent with the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 which was passed since the last franchise and has a great number of ramifications for the franchise. Mr. Miller outlined the franchise as currently written, stating the Telecable would like to see a little more flexibility built into systems standards, primarily because Telecable is required to meet the rather stringent and extensive standards from the Federal Communications Commission. He then referred to rates that Telecable charges. He stated that the Telecable Communications Policy Act had deregulated rates. He stated that the FCC had determined that Port Angeles is an area where Telecable has effective competition from other sources of television signals. He further stated that Telecable would also like to see in the Ordinance a term of 15 years, rather than five years. Councilmembers questioned Mr. Miller extensively. Mayor Whidden asked for additional comments from other members of the public. There were none. Mayor Whidden closed the public hearing, reiter- ating that there would be a second public hearing on June 17th, or July 7, 1987, where testimony on a draft ordinance would be taken. He stated that CITY COUNCIL MEETING 73 1 May 5, 1987 final action of the Council could be taken on July 7, 1987, or shortly thereafter. Mayor Whidden then closed the public hearing. B. Glass Rezone Request RZ- 87(4)1 Denied Other Options to be Considered Mayor Whidden outlined a background memorandum from the Planning Department explaining that the public hearing was to consider rezoning five acres from RS -9, Single Family Residential, to RMF, Residential Multi- Family, to locate a luxury bed and breakfast establishment and executive seminar facility. Manager Flodstrom noted that included in the Council's packet was a letter from Tim Fraser, President of the Port Angeles Chamber of Commerce. He also announced that the Council had received a letter from Norma Turner on the issue and a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Sharp. Jerry Glass, 1108 South Oak, applicant for the rezone, explained that he was proposing to develop a bed and breakfast resort at the subject property currently owned by Glen Priest. Mr. Glass felt there had been a lot of misinformation created and circulated throughout the adjoining neighbor- hood. He outlined the plan to develop a bed and breakfast destination resort; he stated to his knowledge, this would be the only bed and breakfast resort not only on the Peninsula but in the State of Washington. He felt this would be a very good thing for Port Angeles economically because it would offer a facility for people to stay longer in the area rather than just passing through. He stated it was not his intent to develop a mini convention center. He stated no plans for a restaurant existed. Mr. Glass felt the main issue of concern was not the proposed use, rather the possibility of what could happen if it was changed from RS -9 to RMF. Mr. Glass then reviewed permitted uses in both the Residential Multi Family and Single Family Residential Zones as well as Conditional Uses in those zones. He stated the reason the Planning Department had gone for a rezone was to enable the City to have more control over the activity or changes in use. The second reason he stated was that for some reason a bed and breakfast did not fit into any category in the Zoning Code. He stated this limits the bed and breakfasts to a home occupation and assured the Council that this was not a home occupation, describing it as the fastest growing industry in America. He stated the home occupation only allows for one non family staff member and that he would need a staff of five or six people; and therefore, the RS -9 as a Conditional Use Permit does not fit. He felt the Planning Department had done a very good job in putting together as many safeguards in the amended conditions as possible to give the City some type of protection and giving the neighbors equal protection. He felt this project would be a very positive asset and have a very positive impact on the Port Angeles community. He stated the Tudor Inn Bed and Breakfast, which he currently owns, is in the ten best known nationally circulated publications and that his intention was to develop this project with the same intensity, the same quality and the same high standard as they had done with the Tudor Inn. Councilman Hallett commented that the Planning Commission had denied the request 5 0 because of significant detrimental impact. He stated he was not quite sure what that meant, but beyond that, other concerns referred to potential harm to natural aesthetics. He asked if there was anything to prevent the existing property owner from gutting all of that. Mr. Glass explained that he had been unable to make any explanation at the Planning Commission because of conflict of interest. (Mr. Glass is Chairman of the Planning Commission.) He stated there was nothing to prevent the current owner, Mr. Priest, from gutting the property. He stated one of the proposed conditions of the CUP was that the vegetation remain as near to its natural state as possible. He stated nothing would be done to the property to destroy the landscaping, or no external buildings that would be constructed. Councilman McPhee asked the difference between a motel and a bed and breakfast. Mr. Glass stated that a motel does not offer breakfast within the facility. He stated a bed and breakfast gives the type of service that you would not receive in a motel without paying extra, i.e., coffee or tea is served in the room each morning, a full breakfast is prepared or a plate of muffins or fresh fruit is provided with coffee which is taken to the guests' room. He stated that all guests having a full breakfast dine together. Councilman McPhee asked if it would cost more to build a new facility like this somewhere else. Mr. Glass answered, "Absolutely Councilman McPhee and Mr. Glass discussed impact to the area at length. 73 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 5, 1987 During lengthy discussion with the Council, Mr. Glass indicated he had no intention of changing the physical characteristics of the property what- soever. He stated more asphalt might be required for additional parking which could be done without making an impact on the landscaping that exists. Larry Leonard, 1030 Olympus, made corrections to the Planning Department staff report with regard to the number of residences on adjoining proper- ties. He stated he could not find anything wrong with Mr. Glass' proposal and intent. However, he did have a problem with rezoning the property from RS -9 to RMF. He then listed a number of uses which potentially could be allowed if the property was rezoned. Russ Dalton, 1037 Grant Avenue, was opposed to the rezone. He was concerned that additional large parcels of property may then be rezoned which would spoil the orderly growth that has taken place in the neighborhood. Councilman Quast asked Mr. Dalton if that neighborhood had ever circulated an LID to improve the streets in the area. Mr. Dalton did not know if any petitions had been circulated yet. He indicated that there were some large vacant parcels. Myron Rogers of 1027 Grant Avenue was concerned that if this rezone were granted it would be a foot in the door for other developers to build condos, apartments, etc. He stated he had talked to other residents of this quiet area and that none of them would like to see the area changed. He stated this would also change the tax structure of the area. He urged the Council to continue with the residential zone. Jerry Cornell, 824 West Fourth Street, addressed the Council on behalf of the Port Angeles Chamber of Commerce. He stated that the Council was not here tonight to discuss Mr. Glass' proposal, but to discuss a rezone. He stated that the Chamber does not usually take a stand of this nature on an issue like this; however, the Chamber had a strong commitment towards tourism and felt the Glass proposal really provided a missing link toward tourism in Port Angeles. He stated this would provide increased exposure to Port Angeles through these executive seminars. He stated that on many occasions organizations or associations hold conventions in the same cities where small board meetings have been held previously. He felt it was a link to larger meetings through increased exposure of the people who make those kinds of decisions. He did express concern for the neighbors who would be left with what tourists left behind and urged the Council to take the time and energy necessary to work out a solution. He felt there were ways that the neighborhood could be protected, but that we could also find a way to allow this kind of a use that is desperately needed in Port Angeles. Counciiman McPhee indicated concern, and discussed the matter with Mr. Cornell. Mike McNeil of 1025 Olympus Avenue, wondered why the City had to get involved in a rezone so that Mr. Priest could sell his property. Mr. McNeil supported development and the development of a destination resort. He felt the bed and breakfast concept was a good one. He agreed with what Mr. Leonard was saying the issue was not the proposal, the issue was the rezone and he opposed the rezone. Ruth Luedeke of 1018 Olympus Avenue, was concerned about impacts. She was not sure that she would oppose the project but she was opposed to a rezone which could result in even more traffic. Cliff Rosswell of 1117 Grant Avenue, was concerned for children in the area with regard to dangers imposed by additional traffic, as well as the danger of a child being abducted by a transient. He was against the rezone. Craig Miller, business address 403 South Peabody, spoke in favor of the rezone. He felt this was a facility which was needed in Port Angeles. He felt it would bring people to Port Angeles who would spend money in restaur- ants and who might come back and visit Port Angeles again. Mr. Miller mentioned the possibility of a contract rezone. He discussed the issue further with Councilmembers. He felt there was a structural defect in the Zoning Ordinance the Council currently works under. Frank Cavanaugh of 1109 Grant Avenue, stated he would love to see a bed and breakfast in Port Angeles. He felt it was a great idea. However, he felt it was not compatible with the area he lives in. He felt the potential existed for a real traffic problem there. G CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7 3 3 May 5, 1987 Jo Breitbach, 1044 Grant Avenue, was not opposed to the bed and breakfast, but did not want the multi- family zoning. Holmquist, 1038 Grant Avenue, was opposed specifically to the rezone for the precedent that it may set for other residential neighborhoods in the City of Port Angeles and the impact on those neighborhoods. Curt Day, 1003 Grant Avenue stated his driveway was 180° across the street from the Priest driveway. He stated there really was not a street in that area; that it was a narrow conglomeration of potholes with a ditch on each side. He stated that Olympus Avenue was in even worse condition and encouraged Councilmembers to drive up and take a look at the area. There being no further comment, Mayor Whidden closed the public hearing. Councilman Quast clarified that letters from the following parties: Sharp, Burrell, Birch, and Fairvine had been entered into the record. The Council discussed with staff at great length alternative ways to address this proposal, including a possible conditional rezone or conditions that could be attached to the project itself. City Planner Carr explained that the City still had authority to call for environmental review. He also explained another option would be to amend the Zoning Code to specifically address bed and breakfasts. He did caution that Zoning Code changes made quickly might result in unanticipated consequences later on. Councilman Stamon inquired of Mr. Glass how many guests he anticipated having on an average. Mr. Glass anticipated an average of four vehicles on the site. She inquired of Planning Director Carr how long it would take to amend the Zoning Ordinance. Planner Carr indicated that if this was placed as a high priority and accepted that others would be put into the lower priority and this project placed on a par with the Retail Stand amendment, discussion drafts could be developed by the second meeting in May. He anticipated there would be a hearing before the Planning Commission the second meeting in June, with the amendment coming before the Council in July. Councilman McPhee reconfirmed that the Planning Commission did reject this unanimously because it would have a significant detrimental impact on the environment and on the abutting properties. Following lengthy discussion, Councilman Quast moved to concur with the Planning Commission, without prejudice, to deny the rezone. Councilman McPhee seconded. Councilman Stamon asked what type of impact a 90 -day delay would have with the prospect of business. Mr. Glass answered it would be very serious; that as it was now, he was missing an entire season. He stated it could delay opening until next spring. Councilman Stamon spoke in support of the motion, with a strict understanding that at this point, the Council's hands are tied with respect to the decisions that the Council has available to it. She felt the project itself was not opposed by the majority of the neighborhood, so much as the threat of what could happen were a rezone to be granted. She was dismayed that she had to turn something down that she felt should be approved. 4 5he agreed there was a constructive defect in the Ordinance. Councilman Schermer felt that a rezone could be conditioned so that it could have a time limit or a specific use limit. He felt the decision to turn the rezone down was hasty and that the possibility to condition the rezone should be studied. Councilman Hallett spoke in support of the motion. He felt many of the potential neighbors in the area would be supportive of some use of that property, maintaining the integrity and aesthetics of the property. He felt maybe one year ought to be allowed to go by in order to allow the City to do a quality job, not a down and -dirty approach, to see if we could accommodate this and allow for some future applications somewhere else in town along these same lines. Following discussion, the motion carried with Councilman Schermer voting "No Councilman Stamon then moved to direct the formation of a special task force to be made up of a representative from the Chamber of Commerce, staff 73 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 5, 1987 people as appropriate, a representative or two from the neighborhood, a representative from the Planning Commission, to develop language, either in the form of a new section to the Zoning Ordinance or an amendment to the existing language contained in the RS -9 section which would deal with this issue, based on the discussions that we've had in terms of possibilities for making some adjustments to our existing Ordinance to allow us to address these situations in a more constructive way. Councilman Quast seconded. Councilman Stamon stipulated that she did not want this to be on accelerated fast track. She felt 60 days was really making a mistake. She asked that they move along as quickly as they can, but take adequate time to make sure that we are not creating another monster. Councilman Schermer spoke in support of this motion. He indicated that the only reason he had voted against the previous motion was not that he was for the rezone but because he is opposed to government regulations that don't allow us to make a simple decision that we know is appropriate. He stated he would much rather do a short band -aid approach for this particular case, if at all possible, and then take 120 days or more to re -study the thing. Several other Councilmembers supported not moving too quickly. The motion carried. The Council then proceeded to Item No. 8 on the agenda, which was the presentation of a gift to Councilman Hesla in celebration of the upcoming arrival of twins to him and his wife. BREAK The meeting then adjourned for a break from 9:19 P.M. until 9:36 P.M. 4. Planning Commission Minutes of April 22, 1987 Councilman Quast moved to accept and place on file the Planning Commission minutes of April 22, 1987. Councilman Hallett discussed with staff Item No. V of the Planning Commission minutes regarding offices at Ninth and Lincoln. Councilman Stamon seconded the motion, which carried. 5. Annexation Request Bud Myron Area North of Highway 101 and East of McDonald's Councilman Stamon moved to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Department to refer this matter to the Planning Commission. Councilman Hallett seconded and the motion carried. 6. Update on Waterfront Trail Around Crown Zellerbach Mill Councilman Stamon and City Planner Carr provided information to the Council on the status of negotiations regarding the development of the Waterfront Trail around Crown Zellerbach Mill. Councilman Stamon reported that there was a definite commitment for an easement which was being finalized. The Council and staff discussed the matter extensively. 7. Washington State Development Loan Fund Agreement with City and Zarana Fisheries Mayor Whidden reviewed a background memo from toe Planning Department explaining that the Washington State Department of Community Development will be issuing a Washington State Development Loan Fund Grant of $230,000 to the City of Port Angeles for the sole purpose of funding a loan to Zarana Fisheries, Inc., to acquire and install ice making equipment at the Port Dock facilities (Terminal 4) west of Railroad Avenue, and explaining that the total project is anticipated to be $842,000. Councilmen Quast and Schermer were amazed at the lack of opposition to having this grant for- warded through the City, this being the same type of loan as a previous loan which met with a great deal of opposition. 9. Selection of Consultant to Evaluate and Design Secondary Treatment Facilities Rescheduled for May 12th Councilman Quast reported that there was no recommendation at this time; that the Committee would meet once again with the three final applicants. This meeting was scheduled for May 12th at noon, with the first consultant being scheduled at 1:00. Councilman Quast indicated that this was the largest Public Works project ever undertaken by the City of Port Angeles and the Committee members wanted to be certain to make the correct selection. 10. Agreement With Alpha Engineers for Eighth Street Bridges' Structural Analysis and Approval of Funds for Analysis Authorized Councilman Schermer moved to authorize the Mayor to execute an engineering contract with Alpha Engineers in an amount not to exceed $9,752, and to authorize rental of the bridge inspection truck from the Department of Transportation, with additional funding coming from unused Current Expense fund for the under -run on the Race Street Project. Councilman Quast seconded. Upon recommendation by Councilman McPhee, the motion was amended where the funding would come out of Current Expense reserves. The motion carried. 11. Race Street Project A. Property Trade CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 5, 1987 Councilman Hallett moved that Council authorize the Public Works Department to complete negotiations for the land trade and authorize the Mayor to sign the deed from the City to the Gideons to complete this transaction. Coun- cilman Quast seconded. Following discussion, on call for the question, the motion carried. B. Report on Improvements at Eighth and Race Street Intersection Manager Flodstrom explained that this item had been brought back before the Council by Councilman McPhee because of his concerns about the extent of the project whether it be Eighth and Race or Ninth and Race and the improvements that are occurring at the intersection of Eighth and Race itself. 735 Councilman McPhee expressed concern with the proposed evision p the Eighth and Race intersection, feeling the intersection did not need to be revised, stating there had been no increase in accidents at the intersection. He felt no problems existed currently with that inter- section, but that problems would develop if it were revised. Councilman Quast stated that when the Council made provisions for the traffic signal at Eighth and Peabody, provisions were made to synchronize this signal with the traffic signal at Eighth and Lincoln, also with the traffic signal at Eighth and Race. Councilman Quast outlined problems that currently exist with the intersection at Eighth and Race. He felt the double line was a necessity there in order to be uniform with the rest of the City. He moved that Plan No. 3 be adopted, upon completion of the Race Street Project. Councilman Stamon seconded. Councilman Stamon stated there had been concern on the part of the Public Works Department for some time with this intersection and other intersections in the City with regard to a lack of standardization. She requested Public Works Director Pittis explain. Public Works Director Pittis explained that the interest in this project was renewed because the plan included the installation of a signal at Boulevard, which included left -turn pockets. He stated that some day when the bridge was widened, that intersection would also need to be standard- ized. He stated that the Public Works Department was attempting to make Race Street a corridor going to Hurricane Ridge, where each intersection going through was the same, including a left -turn pocket. He indicated that revisions of this nature would reduce the risk of the type of accident that was most serious. Councilmen Schermer, Stamon and McPhee debated the issue extensively. Councilman Stamon called for the question and the motion carried, with Councilman McPhee voting "No Councilman Quast, for the record, indicated the the Council had permitted something here tonight allowing Councilman McPhee to argue a certain point where he still might have proprietary interest which could be challenged, and noted that at this point the Council does not know if there is any proprietary interest. Councilman McPhee requested the record show that Councilman Quast said the purpose of the double line was to prevent traffic from turning left. Councilman Stamon indicated this was Councilman Quast's personal opinion and not the opinion of the Council. Councilman Stamon moved in light of the time to continue with the agenda. Councilman Hallett seconded and the motion carried. 7 3 6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 5, 1987 12. Mayor Authorized to Terminate Agreement with Lakeside Industries at Landfill Councilman Quast moved to authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement to terminate the contract with Lakeside Industries for excavation and gravel processing at the City's Landfill. Councilman Stamon seconded, noting that this had been the recommendation of the UAC. The motion carried. 13. Termination of Street and Area Lighting Contract with BPA Authorized Councilman Hallett moved to authorize the Mayor to sign the notice of termination letter for Bonneville's street and area light program conserva- tion agreement. Councilman Stamon seconded. Councilman McPhee asked if there were any fixtures that had not been converted. Light Director Orton explained that there were some street and yard lighting fixtures that had not been converted. Following further discussion, on call for the question, the motion carried. 14. Confirmation of Mayor's Appointment to Fill Vacancy on the Planning Commission Bob Philpott Appointed Mayor Whidden recommended Bob Philpott to fill the vacancy on the Planning Commission. Councilman Stamon moved to confirm the appointment of Bob Philpott. Councilman Quast seconded. The motion carried, with Councilman McPhee voting "No 15. Proclamations A. Coast Guard Appreciation Week B. Small Business Week C. Senior Center Week D. Public Works Week Councilman Stamon moved to accept proclamations for Coast Guard Apprecia- tion Week, Small Business Week, Senior Center Week and Public Works Week. Councilman Hallett seconded and the motion carried. Mayor Whidden indicated he did not want this to be a precedent set, understanding there were so many this evening. VIII LATE ITEMS /CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS ra-w P Councilman McPhee mentioned a dangerous situation with a bike k located at the end of Park Street. During discussion, it was determined that the r�tm bike was located on property that did not belong to the City. Manager Flodstrom indicated that if the neighbors agree they would like it removed and are willing to participate by removing it and setting it out on the street, the City would haul it away. Councilman McPhee then asked if staff could do something about members of the public who are disruptive to meetings. Mayor Whidden stated he would be accountable for that. Councilman Quast inquired as to the status of the Centennial Fund. Manager Flodstrom indicated he had heard there was approximately $27,000. Council members and staff discussed this extensively. Councilman Stamon commented on a recent visit to Port Angeles by KOMO television who had conducted their news report from the City Pier. She commented on the new City Hall, stating that it looks very good. Councilman Hallett thanked staff for two responses, one regarding surplus City property and what the procedures are there; also a cost comparison provided on Daily News ad rates. He also inquired when we would be talking about summer water rates, requesting it be placed on the agenda of the next meeting. Staff responded that UAC would discuss it and bring it back to Council. Councilman Hesla commented on the Fourth of July display provided by the Chamber of Commerce and urged the Council to support this event. He also urged citizens to chip in where they can. He recommended emphasis be placed on safety at the Spit on the Fourth of July. Mayor Whidden reported that he and Mr. Carr had attended a meeting on de- velopment of small city waterfronts. He conveyed his pride in the presen- tations done by both City Planner Carr and Ken Sweeney from the Port of Port Angeles. He also reported on the Bicycle Sunday participated in by citizens of the City last Sunday. He reported that approximately 20 folks had participated. Councilman McPhee spoke on change orders on the new City Hall. He stated he had only seen two of the first 84 change orders, each of them being over $40,000. Manager Flodstrom stated that if Councilman McPhee would read the information that came with those, he would see that each of those repre- sented approximately 50 change. Councilman McPhee asked if the Council would be seeing all of the change orders. Manager Flodstrom indicated that they had already seen most of them on the weekly progress reports submitted by Public Works Director Pittis. Councilman Stamon recommended staff make those available to any Councilmember who wanted to X stop by and have a look at them. Councilman Hallett indicated the Council had been getting every change. He indicated that he had received approximately 85. During discussion, Public Works Director Pittis ,4 state' Tthe project was having problems remaining within budget. Mayor Whidden emphasized that all of this information was available at City Hall for Councilmembers to review. Councilman McPhee requested copies of-e14-4s4- theVchange orders to date. a r1se N ti Councilman Stamon raised a point of order. She felt it was really out of hand when the Council starts making demands of staff that are well above and beyond their ability to carry out. She stated those of the Council who spent a lot of time at City Hall could see how busy staff is and recom- mended to the rest of the Council that they have got to each take a look, individually, when they make a request for information, as to the relative importance of getting that information in Xerox form, as compared to availing themselves of the opportunity to go down and look through the files, because it was consuming a tremendous amount of staff time that could be better spent serving the people of Port Angeles and doing better things than making Xerox copies. Councilman McPhee stated he had attended a meeting on the Open Public Meetings Act recently. A heated debate arose. Manager Flodstrom indicated that the information was available. He indicated that no one was trying to withhold information from Councilman McPhee. He stated it was time- consum- ing, cumbersome and expensive to sit down and make a copy of all of that material. Councilman Quast recommended that if Councilman McPhee wanted to save time and taxpayers' expense, he set aside a day to come down and see all the documents, as they are in the files. Councilman McPhee stated he was willing to make copies himself. The UAC scheduled a meeting on either May 20th or 21st, 1987, in the after- noon. Councilman Stamon thanked Sherri Anderson for her information on the Succeed in Port Angeles program. She urged all Councilmembers to read it. IX ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION The meeting was adjourned to executive session at 10:57 P.M. for the purpose of discussing litigation. X RETURN TO OPEN SESSION The meeting returned to open session at approximately 11:12 P.M. Ordinance Adopted Mayor Whidden then read an Ordinance by title, entitled ORDINANCE NO. 2444 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington authorizing condemnation of real property within the City of Port Angeles. CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7 3 7 May 5, 1987 7 3 8 CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 5, 1987 XI ADJOURNMENT CC1036[1] Councilman Quast moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. He stated he did this regretfully, as the Real Estate Committee and staff had tried arduously to come to an adequate agreement with owners. He stated for the value of the public health and welfare it is necessary to take this action at this time. Councilman Stamon seconded. Following discussion, on call for the question, the motion carried, with Councilman McPhee voting "No Attorney Knutson stated that he would prepare a Petition of Condemna- tion to be filed with Superior Court, which would have to be served on the property owners. The meeting was adjourned at 11;27 P.M. .,/k1:44., Clerk Mayor 4), c„.„