HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 09/06/19942834
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
September 6, 1994
CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Sargent called the special meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order
SPECIAL MEETING: at 6:04 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mayor Sargent, C. ouncilmembers Braun, Doyle, Hulett,
McK~own, Ostrowski, and Schueler.
Members Absent: None.
Staff Present: Manager Pomeranz, Assistant Attorney Dickson, Clerk
Upton, S. Brodhun, B. Collins,. L. Glenn, K. Godbey, S.
Ilk, J. Pittis, B. Titus, N. Wu, B. Jones, B. Becket, and
K. Ridout.
Public Present: W. Quast, C. Whidden, E. Tuttle, P. Lamoureux, J.
Ralston, A. Westmark, R. Westmark, B. Philpott, C.
Alexander, and D. Nelson.
Capital Facilities Capital Facilities Plan: Mayor Sargent stated that the purpose of this special
Plan meeting was to consider the 1995 - 2000 Capital Facilities Plan. There have been
some changes and additions to the Plan since it was last considered, and the Mayor
asked Light Director Titus, Chairman of the CFP Committee, to review the
document.
Director Titus reviewed the structure of the CFP as presented to the Council this
evening, and he noted the addition of eight projects to the Plan as a result of the last
discussion. Those projects added, primarily for 1995, were: Cronauer property
acquisition, Washington Street reconstruction, warning sirens, City Light Operations
Center, Civic Field enhancement, Waterfront Trail Part IV, Waterfront Trail
lighting, and the new sidewalk program. The approximate total of the additions was
$2 Million.
Mayor Sargent requested that staff prepare a graph or listing of the City's current
indebtedness and when it will be paid off. She indicated members Of the public are
interested in receiving this information, and Manager Pomeranz suggested the
possibility of distributing this information via the City newsletter.
In reviewing the General Purpose element of the Capital Facilities Plan, Director
Titus noted he had added a notation, where applicable, as to the impact on property
taxes. A question was raised concerning the addition of warning sirens, and
Manager Pomeranz explained that the ultimate decision is most certainly that of the
Council. However, items such as this were added to the CFp due to the potential
availability of grant funding. Discussion also centered around the Sidewalk Program
and the availability of additional funds through street vacation payments.
Discussion was held concerning the possibility of a commitment being made on
certain projects in anticipation of the introduction of two new utilities, street and
stormwater. Manager Pomeranz expressed concern that commitments may be made
and then a decision subsequently made to not implement those taxes. The City may
still be forced to proceed with the projects without the benefit of the additional tax
revenue.
Director Titus then explained the Enterprise element and the Appendix of the CFP,
which was inclusive of a master project list and funding sources. He advised the
Council that the Capital Facilities Plan is an element of the Comprehensive Plan and,
therefore, it can only be adjusted once per year. However, the fmancing component
of the CFP can be changed at any time. If, for example, a project is inadvertently
not included in the list, it cannot be added until the time of the annual update.
Attorney Knutson will be preparing a resolution whereby the Council can make
revisions to the Comprehensive Plan on a calendar year basis. This is important in
terms of timing specifically pertinent to the Capital Facilities Plan, as well as the
transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan.
-1-
2835
September 6, 1994
Capital Facilities Director Titus explained the Council's future involvement in these projects as relates
Plan (Cont'd) to the decision to proceed or not to proceed, to solicit bids, award bids, and the like.
Manager Pomeranz indicated it is relatively easy to address these projects in terms
of a future tax increase; however, as the time draws closer, the climate for such an
increase may have changed significantly but the City may have already committed
to the project. Many of the projects listed cannot be accomplished in the absence of
a tax increase. This issue deserves serious consideration before any final decisions
are made. Public Works Director Pittis indicated that, during the Committee's
deliberations on this matter, it was agreed that no development or project decisions
should move forward until the time a decision has been made as to the means of
funding, particularly as it may relate to the new taxes/utilities.
Director Titus distributed for the Council's review a listing of projects for the 1995
Capital Budget. Lengthy discussion followed on the projects included. Director
Pittis directed the Council's attention to Page 42 of the CFP, Ediz Hook Phase II.
· He requested that this project be moved to the 1995 list, as the Coast Guard is
moving forward much sooner on this project than was originally anticipated. The
City will be providing the engineering for the project, the cost of which will be
reimbursed by the Coast Guard. The Council agreed by consensus to make this
requested change.
Wemer Quast, 3800 Park Knoll, complimented Director Titus and the committee for
an excellent job. Dr. Quast referenced the upcoming Library bond election and,
during the ensuing discussion concerning the dollar amount of the bond issue, Mayor
Sargent offered clarification in that the Library Board has committed $600,000 of its
reserve toward the project, thus decreasing the amount needed via the bond issue.
Dr. Quast inquired as to whether the City would generate any revenue from the lease
agreement written in conjunction with this project. Mayor Sargent indicated the
amount would be nominal. Dr. Quast urged the Council to use the funds remaining
from the Senior Services Community Center toward the renovation of the Library
Carnegie Building. Mayor Sargent indicated a survey will be distributed in the City
newsletter posing the question as to how the public wishes to have the excess funds
used. Councilmember McKeown felt the Library would not be getting a "free ride".
Councilman Schueler indicated that the library will be providing all of the materials,
and he expressed hope that Dr. Quast would like to see the community get a new
library. Dr. Quast expressed his support for the new facility.
Chuck Whidden urged the Council to make available to the public a list of the City's
current outstanding debt. Mayor Sargent reiterated her previous request that this
information be distributed.
ADJOURN SPECIAL Mayor Sargent adjourned the special meeting at 7:04 p.m.
MEETING:
CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Sargent called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order
REGULAR MEETING: at 7:07 p.m.
PLEDGE OF The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Scout Troop 1458. Participating
ALLEGIANCE: were: Travis Wilson, Jeff Cmff, and Jimmy Cates.
APPROVAL OF Councilman Ostrowski moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of
MINUTES: August 16, 1994. Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion, which carried
by a majority vote, with Councilman Hulett abstaining due to his absence from
that meeting.
CEREMONIAL 1. Proclamation recognizing Disabled American Veterans Forget-Me-Not Week,
MATTERS/ August 29 through September 9, 1994
PROCLAMATIONS:
Mayor Sargent read a proclamation declaring August 29 - September 9, 1994, as
Disabled American Disabled American Veterans Forget-Me-Not Week. Members of Chapter gO of the
Veterans Forget-Me- DAV were present to accept the proclamation.
Not Week
Yard of the Month 1. Yard of the Month Award for September, 1994
The individual Yard of the Month Awards were presented to: Karlene & Robert
Shinn, 136 East Park; Holly Helpenstell & Ed Manzo, 904 East 7th; Miki Raymond
& Clarence Walz, 1021 Grant; Dick & Carla Dowd, 732 Christman; and Jim & Julie
Haguewood, 705 Christman. The Neighborhood of the Month Award was presented
to the residents of the 1800 Block of East Lauridsen, including: Ryan Rogstad,
2836
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
September 6, 1994
Yard of the Month Donald & Becky Dundon, Russel Westmark, Robert & Carol Philpott, Steven &
(Cont'd) Mary Hauff, Spencer & Barbara Thompson, Robert & Evelyn Carlson, and Chuck
& Mary Lou Panlson.
CITY COUNCIL Councilman Doyle had no report.
COMMITTEE
REPORTS: Councilman Schueler referenced the matter of Human Services funding, particularly
in relation to Healthy Families. He asked that this matter be added to the agenda for
the next meeting for Council's consideration. In addition, concerning the Youth
Violence Network, Councilman Schueler reported that the Cities of Forks and
Sequim agreed to review a list of applicants in order to select one representative to
serve on the Network. Further, both cities agreed to have Councilman Schueler
serve as the representative of the three cities for the first year.
Councilman Braun had no report.
Councilman Hulett attended a meeting of the Chamber of Commerce Board; the
Chamber's annual auction is set for October 1.
Councilman Ostrowski had no report.
Councilmember McKeown met with Planning Director Collins to prepare for the first
meeting of the School Concurrency Task Force.
Mayor Sargent attended the Economic Development Council Board meeting. In
addition, she participated in the dedication of a Habitat for Humanity house. A
meeting was held with hotel/motel managers for the purpose of discussing an
increase in the hotel/motel taxes. Also, Mayor Sargent will be attending an AWC
legislative meeting this Thursday.
FINANCE: 1. Consideration of bids for new Sidewalk Program
Bids for New Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department.
Sidewalk Program Director Pittis expanded on the information by explaining how the property owners
will be participating in the Sidewalk Program. Councilman Braun commended the
work completed thus far on the sidewalks in the City.
Councilman Ostrowski moved to accept the bid from Primo Construction, Inc.,
for construction of the new Sidewalk Program for the base bid of $81,652.86 and
additive bid//2 (priority #1) of $15,655.64 and authorize the Mayor to execute
the construction contract. Councilman Braun seconded the motion, which
carried unanimously.
CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Braun moved to accept the Consent Agenda, including: (1)
Consideration of advertisement for RFP on curbside recycling; (2) Travel
request from Finance Deparhnent for Charles Kasicki to attend Novell for
certification as netware engineer - $1,970; (3) Voucher list - September 2, 1994 -
$2,256,687.32; and (4) Payroll - August 14, 1994 - $365,406.45 and August 28,
1994 - $349,815.97. Councilman Doyle seconded the motion. Limited discussion
followed concerning the curbside recycling RFP, as well as the Voucher List. In
addition, Councilmember McKeown supported the effort to maintain certification of
the netware engineer. A vote was taken on the motion, which carried
unanimously.
ITEMS FROM THE Paul Lamoureux, 602 Whidbey Street, referenced a letter he recently sent to the City
AUDIENCE/COUNCIL Council and directed comments to the matter of the water/wastewater rates. He
STAFF TO BE asked if there was a valid reason why the citizens could not receive a higher
CONSIDERED OR minimum utilization for water without jeopardizing the financing of the wastewater
PLACED ON A treatment plant. Mr. Lamoureux expressed the need for the higher utilization level,
FUTURE AGENDA: particularly during summer months, in order to create an incentive and thereby help
beautify the City by residents taking care of their yards.
Mr. Lamoureux also directed comments to the issue of curbside recycling and
inquired if, in the near future, there will be an increase for curbside recycling.
Further, he queried as to whether there would be a public hearing on this issue at
that time.
Mayor Sargent explained that this evening's consent agenda contained a request for
proposals on the curbside recycling. The City has been negotiating with
Environmental Waste Systems, and in order to secure full financial documentation
as to profits made from recycling, the City is seeking proposals as a means of
'3 '
2837
September 6, 1994
ITEMS FROM THE conducting a comparison. Manager Pomeranz emphasized that it is the City's goal
AUDIENCE/COUNCIL to not have any increase in these particular fees.
STAFF TO BE
CONSIDERED OR On the matter of water/wastewater rates, Councilman Doyle recalled that the
PLACED ON A wastewater fee was setat $24~00 per month due, in a large part, to Mr. Lamoureux's
FUTURE AGENDA: previous request. A certain dollar figure was needed to meet debt obligations, and
(Cont'd) in order to give residents with low utilization and fixed incomes a break, the rate was
set at $23.00 for 430 cubic feet. Utilization in excess of that amount was set at
$26.00. This generated the needed revenue, but at the same time, gave some
residents a financial break.
Mayor Sargent suggested that this matter be reviewed for next year, as it may be
possible for the minimum use figures to be changed without jeopardizing debt
payment funds. Councilman Braun suggested this could be discussed during the
budget process this year, as many citizens have expressed concerned with this issue.
Mr. Lamoureux felt the citizens would appreciate consideration of this issue. He
stated that he did not understand why the wastewater bill was tied to the water usage.
He expressed the opinion .that if enough revenue is generated to repay the treatment
plant debt, then it should not make any difference how much water is used. He
again asked Council to look into the possibility of creating an incentive for the
citizens of Port Angeles to keep Port Angeles green during the summer months.
Mayor Sargent reminded Mr. Lamoureux that the Council did try to address his
concerns in July by tiering the rate. She then asked that Public Works Director Pittis
answer the question as to why water/wastewater rates are tied together. Director
Pittis stated that originally there was a fixed rate for everyone, because the plant is
there and costs the same whether one drop of water or 13 million gallons flows
through it. In attempting to respond to low income/low usage citizens, water was
used as a mechanism to give these people a lower rate. The City can revisit the
issue. Mr. Lamoureux felt that 430 cubic feet was a ridiculously low number, and
this is why he has returned and asked the Council to look at this number again.
He then suggested to the Council that when the RFPs for the recycling contract have
come in, and if it is probable that recycling rates will have to be increased, that the
citizens be given a chance to address this issue. Director Pittis stated that it is
customary to hold a public hearing before setting any new rates.
Planning Director Collins reminded the Council that a public hearing was scheduled
for the September 20 meeting on the Shoreline Master Program.
John Ralston, P. O. Box 1405, expressed his support for the building of a new
library and passage of the bond issue. However, he noted the need for establishing
policy regarding the disposition of excess funds which may accrue from projects such
as this when they come in under budget. Mr. Ralston recently learned that the
Senior Center is between $300,000 and $400,000 under budget, and the excess funds
may not be directed to the retirement of the debt but may be spent on another
project.
Mayor Sargent explained that it is extremely unusual to have surplus funds from a
project, and that indeed, the Senior Services Center will have a surplus. This is due
to the bond issue being passed in 1991 and interest generated for two years before
the project could begin. In addition, bids came in below the estimated costs.
Manager Pomeranz further explained that public projects often involve numerous
change orders. The record will reflect that this Council was extremely diligent in
monitoring such change orders, thereby not expending the dollars from the change
order budget that was originally anticipated.
Mayor Sargent felt the Council should decide what to do in the event there are
excess funds from future projects. It has been suggested that a survey go out in the
next newsletter to seek public opinion on this issue. Mr. Ralston felt that if a bond
issue is promoted it should be plainly stated where excess funds will be spent should
the project come in under budget. He reiterated his preference that excess funds go
strictly to the bonded project and retire debt.
Councilman Ostrowski moved to refer this matter to the City Manager and place
it on the agenda for discussion at the next meeting. Manager Pomeranz pointed
out that the next meeting will be held after the vote on the library bond issue. The
motion died for lack of a second. Councilman Doyle requested that this item be
placed on this evening's agenda so the Council can discuss the possibility of excess
library bond funds and how they might be spent. The item was, therefore, added to
the agenda as Item E.9.
-4-
2838
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
September 6, 1994
Capital Facilities Plan - Resolution Approving the 1995-2000 Capital Facilities Plan
Resolution No. 11-94
Mayor Sargent read the Resolution by title, entitled
RESOLUTION NO. 11-94
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Port Angeles, Washington, approving the 1995-
2000 Capital Facilities Plan.
Councilman Doyle moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. Councilman
Schueler seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
LEGISLATION: A. Public Hearings ·
Public Hearings 1. Zoning Code Amendment - ZCA 94(07)04 - City of Port Angeles, Various
Zoning Code Amendments: Proposal to amend the City °s zoning regulations
Zoning Code Amendment to allow microbreweries as a conditional use in the CBD and ACD Districts
City of Port Angeles and as a permitted use in the LI zone; to create a minimum lot area for the
M-2 Zone; and to specify the use of zoning lot covenants.
Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Planning Department and
opened the public hearing at 8:05 p..m.
Larry Leonard, 1030 Olympus, asked for an explanation of the zoning lot covenants.
Director Collins explained that the recommended change would allow zoning lot
covenants in specific instances. The previous zoning code was moot on the issue,
and this was an administrative procedure. Discussion followed as to what would be
covered by the covenants such as lot size, etc. Mr. Leonard stressed that this control
was unnecessary. He could not understand why there should be a regulation against
making lots bigger than necessary for residential uses. There is no need for City
control if someone wishes to have a larger building site than is needed for the
project.
Director Collins explained that the law does not allow one to build across a lot line,
but rather the lot line must be removed. This is what the zoning lot covenant has the
affect of doing. Otherwise the building would have to set back from the lot line
running down the middle.
John Ralston, P. O. Box 1405, spoke against the zoning lot covenant changes. He
cited three instances in the City where there are side-by-side substandard lots of 25'
x 130' in an RS-9 area with 50' of frontage on the road. If this zoning lot covenant
is adopted, these lots would have to be replatted but they would not be able to be
replatted into something that equals 9000 sq. ft.
Director Collins responded that in the situation described by Mr. Ralston, it might
be possible to seek a variance. However, most of the cases being dealt with are not
situations as described by Mr. Ralston. They are lots where there is a series of
undeveloped properties which were platted many years ago. Instead of combining
several small lots into a larger lot, which would be allowed in the RS-9 zone, the
property owner combines two lots into a 50' lot that is now substandard to that zone.
This is what most often occurs. The intent of the ordinance is not to prevent the
combining of two small lots.
Mr. Ralston encouraged the Council to not pass this zoning lot covenant as it could
possibly lead to future litigation.
Larry Leonard returned to the podium. He stated that if a person is going to use two
lots, and one lot is going to be used as a setback, there should be a way t° mark it
on the map and claim the lot is used and cannot be built on in the future. He asked
Director Collins about building permit applications, and Director Collins explained
that if there are two separate lots, and one is being used as a setback, it can still be
sold later on under State of Washington laws, as whatever problems exist on one lot
do not affect the second lot.
Mr. Leonard felt that there had to be a way around this. The variance process is a
very strict system, and someone may have purchased two 25' wide side-by-side lots
in good faith, and cannot now build on them which is unfair.
Director Collins explained to the Council that it was his belief that the zoning lot
covenant was intended to deal with development that had occurred in the City, where
in the past buildings were built on two or three lots, which was fairly frequent in the
old townsite in particular. It was feared that when someone went to sell their home,
it would be discovered that the building went over the lot line, and it would cause
-5 -
2839 '
September 6, 1994
LEGISLATION: problems with the title and with the sale of the property. As a result, the Zoning
(Cont'd) Code had this zoning lot process and this zoning lot covenant administrative
procedure was developed to attempt to help people who found themselves in this
Zoning Code Amendment situation through no fault of their own. This zoning lot covenant was done as part
City of Port Angeles of a housek~ing measure to attempt to address several problems related to the
(Cont'd) original language of the Zoning Code. It addresses those problems dealing with
existing houses and pre-existing plats that were substandard. It doesn't solve all the
problems dealing with substandard lots within the City of Port Angeles. Taking this
out of the ordinance will place the City back to whether or not a zoning lot covenant
is possible. The variance process may not work for the other problems of trying to
~ merge ~4~,infill lots that are substandard. The Planning Department will have to try
to resolve that problem next year. Discussion followed.
John Ralston returned to the podium and stated that he has owned several properties
in the City where the homes have been built in the middle of two property lines. He
has gone through refinances and title insurance and has never run into a problem
with the bank or title company.
There being no further testimony, Mayor Sargent closed the public hearing at 8:28
p.m.
~ Councilman Doyle felt there were t~ many items covered in one ordinance. All
annexations require RS-9 zoning. Several properties annexed are probably
considered substandard lots. Therefore, they could only accommodate two 9' wide
houses, as opposed to one 30' wide house if this zoning change is approved. He was
certain this was not the City's intent. There could be many problems in the future
with annexations if this ordinance is approved. Councilman Braun agreed with
Councilman Doyle and felt the Council should proceed with allowing the
microbreweries as a conditional use and omit the zoning lot covenant. Perhaps staff
could return at a later date with zoning lot covenants that addressed the issues
brought up this evening.
Councilman Schueler noted that Planning Commissioner German voted against this
issue, and he is in the construction business. He felt that there were many
unanswered questions on this. Mayor Sargent echoed the concerns expressed by
other Council members and felt more information was needed regarding the zoning
lot covenants.
Director Collins stated that he did not believe it would be a problem if the Council
wished to approve portions of the ordinance and not approve items dealing with the
zoning lot covenants. In the absence of the City Attorney's opinion, this item could
be continued to the September 20, 1994, Council meeting.
Councilman Doyle moved to continue the public hearing and defer a decision on
the Zoning Code amendment to a later date and to instruct staff to draft an
ordinance which would include everything but the portion pertaining to zoning
lot covenants. Councilman Braun seconded the motion. Director Collins pointed
out that the public hearing had been closed, and therefore, a motion would be
appropriate to reopen the public hearing and then continue it. Attorney Dickson
agreed this should be done by a separate motion. A vote was taken on the motion,
which carried unanimously. Councilman Doyle moved to reopen the public
hearing and continue it to the Septonber 20, 1994 meeting. Councilman Braun
seconded the motion. Discussion followed, and staff was directed to address the
concerns expressed this evening, and prepare a report for the Council.
Councilman Schueler felt this was outside the expertise of the Council and the issue
should be resolved by the Planning Commission. Planning Director Collins agreed,
and quoted from the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 17.96.100, wherein an ordinance
can be modified from the advertised form; however, it should be reviewed and
reported on by the Planning Commission if the modification made changes what the
Planning Commission originally recommended.
A vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
Zoning Code Amendment 2. Zoning Code Amendment - ZCA 94(08)05 - First Presbyterian Church,
First Presbyterian Church Commercial Residential (CR) Districts, City-wide: Amendment to the zoning
regulations which would permit occasional use of church facilities for
transitional and temporary housing for homeless and/or displaced persons
Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Planning Department and
opened the public hearing at 8:55 p.m.
Larry Leonard, 1030 Olympus, spoke in favor of the Planning Commission's
-6-
2840
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
September 6, 1994
LEGISLATION: recommendation. Filing for a conditional use permit would be a financial burden on
(Cont'd) the Church, as it costs approximately $300 and is money which could pay for a lot
of food, beds and sheets. He further stated that this is a traditional use within the
Zoning Code Amendment Church.
First Presbyterian Church
(Cont'd) Rosalie Doty, 103 S. Ridgeview Drive, a representative of the Presbyterian Church,
stated that the Church appreciated the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
There being no further testimony, Mayor Sargent closed the public hearing at 9:02
p.m. ·
Councilmember McKeown moved to concur with the recommendation of the
Planning Commission for denial of the zoning code amendment, citing Findings
1 - 6 and Conclusions A - C, as set forth in Exhibit "A", which is attached to
and becomes a part of these minutes. Councilman Schueler seconded the
motion. Mayor Sargent stated that the decision made by the Planning Commission
was a very good one. Chief Glenn stated that there are some churches in the City
where the CUP is necessary in order to determine if the churches are equipped to
handle transitional housing. The Presbyterian Church has all the safety features
necessary for transitional housing, but some of the smaller churches may not. Public
Works Director Pittis stated that there are also building codes to be considered.
After further discussion, staffwas directed to return with recommendations regarding
safe transitional/transient housing in churches. A vote was taken on the motion,
which carried unanimously.
Larry Leonard returned to the podium to encourage the submission of staff reports
prior to the public hearings so that the public has a chance to comment.
Break Mayor Sargent recessed the meeting for a break at 9:25 p.m. The meeting
reconvened at 9:40 p;m.
Street Vacation - Hall 3. Petition for Vacation of City Right-of-Way - STV 94(08)04 Hall, Portion of
Columbia/Water Street alley abutting Lots 8, 9, 10 and 11, Block 2, Puget
Sound Cooperative Colony's Addition to the Townsite of Port Angeles
Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Planning Department and
opened the public hearing at 9:40 p.m. There being no one present who wished to
address the issue, the public heating was dosed at 9:40 p.m.
Councilman Braun asked what rights a petitioner would have under the Right-of-Way
Use Permit that he would not have under a vacation. Director Collins explained that
the petitioner is primarily concerned with trespassers, as he owns property on both
sides of the alley and is concerned that he would not be allowed to put up a fence
if the street were not vacated. The Planning Department has informed Mr. Hall that
it would be happy to work with him in obtaining a Right-of-Way Use Permit to allow
a fence across the City's property as well as his own. It was felt this would be a
better solution than vacation of public right-of-way within an environmentally
sensitive area.
Councilman Ostrowski moved to concur with the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and deny the petition to vacate, citing Findings 1 - 8 and
Conclusions A - B, as set forth in Exhibit "B", which is attached to and becomes
a part of these minutes. Councilman Doyle seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Referring back to the second public hearing on transitional housing, Councilman
Doyle moved to direct staff to examine the issue of safe tramitional/transient
honsing in churches, considering the concerns expressed by Chief Glenn, and to
bring recommendations or a specific ordinance back to the Council for review.
Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion. Councilman Braun asked that
this be brought back for the next meeting, as he felt this to be a matter of some
urgency. Chief Glenn stated he felt there was sufficient time to do a draft report.
Councilman Doyle amended his motion such that the report is to be brought
back to the Council at its next meeting. Conncilmember McKeown agreed as
seconder, and after further brief discussion, a vote was taken on the motion, which
carried unanimously.
-7-
2841
September 6, 1994
LEGISLATION: B. Ordinances Not Requiring a Public Hearing
(Cont'd)
1. Amendment to the Civil Service Ordinance to Remove the Fire Chief from
Amendment to the Civil the Civil Service System and Change Rules to Modify Composition of the
Service Ordinance - Interview Board for~Fire Department Promotional Exams
Ordinance No. 2833
Resolution 12-94 Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Human Resources Manager
and read the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 2833
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
removing the position of Fire Chief from the classified
civil service, revising the composition of the interview
board for certain civil service promotional examinations,
· and amending Ordinance 2410 and Chapter 2.22 of the
Port Angeles Municipal Code.
Councilman Braun moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. Councilman
Hulett seconded the morion. Councilmember McKeown requested clarification of
the composition interview board, which was provided by Human Resources Manager
Coons. Manager Pomeranz, at Mayor Sargent's request, explained why the Police
Chief was not removed from classified civil service. After further brief discussion,
a vote was taken on the morion, which carried unanimously.
Mayor Sargent read the Resolution by title, entitled
RESOLUTION NO. 12-94
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Port Angeles, Washington, amending the rules of
the Civil Service Commission.
Councilman Hulett moved to pass the Resolution as read by rifle. Councilman
Schueler seconded the morion, which carried unanimously.
Junk Vehicle Abatement - 2. Amendment of Junk Vehicle Abatement Ordinance.
Ordinance No. 2834
Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the City Attorney's office and
read the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 2834
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
amending Ordinance 2698 and PAMC 8.05.020 by revising
the definition of ~junk vehicle*.
Councilman Ostrowski moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title.
Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion. After a discussion regarding
what constitutes a junk vehicle, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Meeting Extended Councilman Doyle moved to extend the meeting past 10:00 p.m. Councilman
Past 10:00 p.m. Braun seconded the morion, which carried unanimously.
-.. Business License 3. Amendment of Business Licensing Ordinance
Ordinance Amendment-
Ordinance No. 2835 Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the City Attorney's Office and
read the 'Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 2835
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, related to business licenses
and regulations and amending Chapter I of
Ordinance 2050, as amended, and Chapter 5.04
of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
Councilmember McKeown moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title.
Councilman Ostrowski seconded the morion. Councilman Schueler asked why the
amendment was necessary, and Sr. Assistant Attorney Dickson explained that the
current ordinance does not clearly state what constitutes sufficient grounds for denial
of a license. A vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
-8-
2842
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
September 6, 1994
LEGISLATION: 4. Restricting Use of Fireworks in Hollywood Beach Area
(Cont'd)
Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Fire Department.
Fireworks in Hollywood
Beach Area - ORDINANCE NO. 2836
Ordinance No. 2836
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
restricting the use of fireworks in the Hollywood Beach
area and amending Chapter 8 of Ordinance 2050, as
amended, and Chapter 5.32 of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code.
Councilman Ostrowski moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title.
Councilman Braun seconded the motion. After limited discussion, a vote was
taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
Street Vacation - C. Resolutions Not Requiring Public Hearings
Shillington -
Resolution No. 13-94 1. Street Vacation Petition - STV 94(10)06 - SHILLINGTON, Petition
requesting vacation of a portion of "A " Street north of Fourth Street. (Set
public hearing for October 4, 1994)
Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Planning Department, and
read the Resolution by title, entitled
RESOLUTION NO. 13-94
A RESOLUTION of the City of Port Angeles
setting a hearing date for a petition to
vacate the east one-half of "A" Street,
north of Fourth Street, Port Angeles, Washington.
Councilman Braun moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. Councilman
Doyle seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Planning Commission D. Planning Commission Minutes/Action Items
Minutes/Action Items
1. Review of Interim Parking Business Improvement Area (PBLA) Regulations:
Review of Interim PBIA One year scheduled review of the downtown parking regulations.
Regulations
Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Planning Department.
Councilman Hulett moved to concur with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and allow a one-year extension for this issue to be reviewed in June,
1995. Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion. A vote was taken on the
motion, which carried unanimously.
2. Planning Commission Minutes of August 10, 1994
Councilman Braun moved to accept the minutes of August 10, 1994.
Councilman Doyle seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
3. Planning Commission Minutes of August 24, 1994
Councilmember McKeown moved to accept the minutes of August 24, 1994.
Councilman Ostrowski seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Shoreline Substantial 4. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit - SMA 94(08) 144 -Daishowa
Development Permit- America Co., Ltd., Marine Drive: Proposal to improve the Mill's
Daishowa America Co., stormwater runoff collection system.
Ltd.
Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Planning Department.
Councilman Doyle moved to approve the Shoreline Substantial Development
Permit, subject to Conditions A - B and citing Findings 1 - 5 and Conclusions
A - C, as set forth in Exhibit "C", which is attached to and becomes a part of
these minutes. Councilman Schueler seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
-9-
2843
September 6, 1994
LEGISLATION: 5. Planning Commission Minutes of August 31, 1994
(Cont'd)
Councilman Schueler moved to accept the minutes of August 31, 1994.
Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
?
E. Other ConSiderations
Impact of Mandates on 1. Discuss Impact of Mandates on Port Angeles (Requested by Ed Tuttle)
Port Angeles
Ed Tuttle, 22 Ahlvers Road, read aloud and gave his interpretation of the law
regarding unfunded mandates. Mr. Tuttle stated that the State has ignored this law,
knowing it is cost prohibitive for local government to challenge the judicial system.
Mr. Tuttle's group has been working with Linda Smith's staff of Olympia, and his
group has been supplied with 82 pages of back-up data. Local governments around
the country have said enough is enough. Washington is unique, as it has a law that
states "unfunded mandates are against the law'. The unfunded mandates passed on
to the City of Port Angeles are estimated at $70 million.
Mr. Tuttle requested that a meeting be organized with one governing representative
and one legal representative from each concerned entity to consider the possibility
of litigation. The results and recommendations should then be brought to the City
Council for action or non-action. To date, there has been no lawsuit of any
substance against the State of Washington. Mr. Tuttle's group would like someone
to study the matter thoroughly.
Councilman Braun indicated that he had read some of the information Mr. Tuttle had
received from the State, and he urged the rest of the Council to review it, as it is
interesting reading. Mr. Tuttle explained that the information is available in the City
Manager's office. Discussion followed.
Councilman Braun moved to have the City take part in a meeting regarding a
possible lawsuit against the State for unfunded mandates. Councilmember
McKeown seconded the motion. Discussion followed, and Councilman Braun
restated the motion to have the City convene a meeting with the County and other
municipalities regarding a possible lawsuit against the State for unfunded
mandates. In the ensuing discussion, the question was raised as to whether it would
be more appropriate for the County to serve as the lead agency in such an effort.
In addition, Mayor Sargent reminded the Council members that she would be
attending an AWC legislative meeting this coming Thursday. It may be
advantageous to seek input from the AWC, as a larger effort representative of more
agencies may prove to be more successful. By consensus, the Council agrecxl to
have the Mayor seek input from the AWC before moving forward on the issue.
Councilman Braun, therefore, offered to withdraw his motion, to which
Councilmember McKeown, as seconder, agreed.
Fire Inspection of 2. Contracting Fire Inspection of Boarding Homes
Boarding Houses
Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Fire Department.
Councilman Doyle moved to enter into a contract, acceptable to the City
Attorney, with the State Fire Marshal's office for fire inspection services
rendered and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract. Councilmember
McKeown seconded the motion A brief discussion followed, after which a vote
was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
PENCOM Remodeling 3. Recommendation of Architectural Firm for PenCom Remodelling Project.
Project
Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Police Department.
Councilman Doyle moved to authorize the Police Department to negotiate an
agreement with the firms of Robert Nixon Associates, Inc., and Lindberg
Architects for services necessary for the remodel of Peninsula Communications
Center, the agreement to be signed by the Mayor. Councilman Braun seconded
the motion. After a brief discussion, a vote was taken on the motion, which
carried unanimously.
Adoption of 1995 4. Adoption of 1995 City Budget Calendar
Budget Calendar
Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Finance Department, and
by consensus, the budget calendar was adopted.
- 10-
2844
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
September 6, 1994
LEGISLATION: 5. Consideration of Agreement with Clallam County Household Hazardous
(Cont'd) Waste Day
Household Hazardous Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Solid Waste Superintendent.
Waste Day Councilman Braun moved to authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement with
Clallam County and contribute up to $5,000 for Household Hazardous Waste
Amnesty Day. Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Forest Service Grant 6. Consideration of Agreement with Clallam County for Forest Service Grant
for Downtown Planning
Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department.
Councilman Ostrowski moved to authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement
with Clallam County regarding USDA Forest Service grant support for the Port
Angeles Transportation Center and Downtown Revitalization Plan.
Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion. Manager Pomeranz explained
that these funds were part of the Timber Disaster Fund, to be placed in already
existing programs. After further discussion, a vote was taken on the motion,
which carried unanimously.
Downtown Watermain/ 7. Consideration of Contract with Public Work~ Trust Fund for Loan on
Sidewalk Project Downtown Watermain/Sidewalk Project.
Mayor Sargent reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department.
Councilmember McKeown moved to authorize the Mayor to execute the contract
with the Department of Community Development accepting a Public Works
Trust Fund loan for the Port Angeles Downtown Sidewalk and Watermain
Reconstruction Project. Councilman Braun seconded the motion. Limited
discussion followed, and a vote was taken on the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Real Estate Committee 8. Set Date for Real Estate Committee Meeting.
Meeting Set
A Real Estate Committee meeting was set for Wednesday, September 21, 1994, at
4:00 p.m.
Library Bond Funds 9. Library Bond Funds
Councilman Doyle felt the Council should consider Mr. Ralston's suggestion
concerning the disposition of excess funds if the Library Bond passes and the project
comes in under budget. The voting public should be aware of what the City will do
with the excess funds before being asked to vote on the issue. Councilman Doyle
moved that in the event the Library Bond passes, and if there are excess funds
after the new library was been completed, that these funds be used to pay off the
bond. Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion. Manager Pomeranz asked
that the motion be amended to state "to pay off the bond or to reduce taxes", as it
may be a noncallable bond, which cannot be paid back early. However, there is a
possibility of reduced taxes for a period of time. Councilman Doyle as maker of
the motion, and CoUncilmember McKeown as seconder, agreed with this
amendment. In the ensuing discussion, Mr. Ralston emphasized the need to make
sure the money is used toward the retirement of the debt. A vote was taken on the
motion, which carried unanimously.
Manager to attend ICMA 10. Approved Expenditure for Manager to attend ICMA Conference
Conference in Chicago
Councilman Ostrowski moved to authorize the expenditure of $1,395 for the City
Manager to attend the ICMA Conference in Chicago, from September 17 - 22,
1994. Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Councilmembers Doyle and McKeown complimented Police Chief Ilk and staff for
the manner in which they handled the Family Skate Center issue.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m.
Cl-~rk q
-11-
2845
Exhibit "A"
ZONING CODE AMENDMENT - ZCA 94(08)05 - FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH,
- Commercial Residential (CR) Districts, City-wide:
Findings:
1. The zoning ordinance has been reviewed with respect to temporary housing provisions.
2. The Comprehensive Plan stresses in the housing element the goal to provide emergency
and transitional housing. "
3. The Commercial Residential Zone represents those arms where businesses occur on small
sites and are of the type providing goods and services required daily by the surrounding
residential zones.
4. The CR zone allows a variety of residential uses including adult family homes and
supported living arrangements, apartments, residential care facilities, single family
residences, bed and breakfast establishments, group homes and hospices.
5. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the proposal on July 25, 1994.
6. The Clallam County Housing Needs Assessment was reviewed. It indicated that in 1990
there were 13,212 bednights provided in homeless shelters in the County in 1990, and
there were 137 bednight requests that were turned away.
Conclusions:
A. The Zoning Code Amendment is not in the public use and interest because it requires
additional city review where it is unnecessary.
B. Churches support many activities and traditionally include sanctuary housing as part of
their services.
C. The Planning Commission interpretation is that sanctuary housing for youth and
disadvantaged are included in church activities.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of September 6, 1994.
Sargent,
A2~YEST: B~lc~-J.~ Upt~n,/City-clerk
2846
Exhibit "B"
PETITION FOR VACATION OF CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY - HALL, Portion of Columbia/Water
- Street alley
Findings:
1. The request is to vacate 2,000 square feet of the Columbia/Water Street Alley, east of the
vacated Chambers Street.
2. The portion of the alley proposed to be vacated abuts Lots 8 & 9 and Lots 10 & 11,
Block 2 of the Puget Sound Cooperative Colony subdivision.
3. The site in question is located below the top of the marine bluff and is identified as an
environmentally sensitive area.
4. Since adoption of the environmentally sensitive areas protection ordinance, the City has
not approved any vacations for right-of-way located within an environmentally sensitive
area. Proposals that were denied or modified include Hailer - STV 93(11)06;
Levick/McCoy - STV 93(06)04; Richmond - STV 93(04)02; and Ralston/Wilson - STV
92(09)04.
5. The portion of the alley proposed for vacation is unimproved and is separated from the
improved alley by a masonry wall.
6. The property above the top of the bluff is zoned RS-7, Residential Single-Family.
Property below the top of the bluff is zoned PBP, Public Buildings and Parks.
7. Comprehensive Plan policies encourage protection of environmentally sensitive areas.
8. City staff has been directed to work with the applicant to secure his property and the
City' s property.
Conclusions:
A. Vacation of this portion of the alley is not in the public use and interest and would not
be a public benefit, as it would transfer environmentally sensitive land from public to
private ownership.
_ B. As conditioned, the street vacation is not consistent with the Goals, Policies and
Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically those identified in the staff report.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of September 6, 1994.
J~I~n_~K.:K Sargent, MaLf~.
ATTEST: B yV Upton,f iiy Clerk
2(~47
Exhibit "C"
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - SMA 94(08)144 - DAISHOWA
- AMERICA CO., LTD:
Conditions:
A. A right-of-way use permit shall be obtained prior to construction of the project.
B. A plan showing how traffic will be routed during constructions shall be submitted to
Public Works for approval prior to commencement of the project, t''~
Findings:
1. The approval is for improvements to the stormwater system including installation of
concrete curbing, catch basin, pipe and pump to channel runoff into the wastewater
treatment plant.
2. The facility is on the site previously occupied by a S'Klallam Village. Because the
project involves excavation of earth, an MDNS was issued which requires monitoring by
a qualified archeologist.
3. The Port Angeles Shoreline Master Program, Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance
have been reviewed with respect to this proposal.
4. The site is zoned M-2 and designated Heavy Industrial in the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The work involves construction within a public right-of-way.
Conclusions:
A. The proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Shoreline Master Program, specifically
General Regulation C.3 & 4; Land Use Element D.6 & D.7; Natural Systems E. 1.a, E.2
E.7. a & b; Use Activities F.8.a & F. 18.a-c.
B. The proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan, specifically Goals
No. 3; Industrial Development Policies No. 5; and Land Use Objectives No. 1 & 3.
- C. The proposal will not be detrimental to the shoreline.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of September 6, 1994.
Jc~_~. Sargent: May~l
A 'TE- ¥1- Upt n, 2ity Cle- k