Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 09/20/19881132 I CALL TO ORDER Mayor McPhee called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. II PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by the Port Angeles High School Key Club, members Debi Eisenman, President, and Brian Gleason. III ROLL CALL Members Present: Mayor McPhee, Councilmen Gabriel, Hallett, Lemon, Sargent, Stamon. Members Absent: None one vacancy. Staff Present: Public Present: V FINANCE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Port Angeles, Washington September 20, 1988 Manager Flodstrom, Attorney Knutson, Clerk Maike, P. Carr, M. Cleland, R. Orton, S. Brodhun, L. Glenn, J. Pittis, T. Smith, J. Caverly, G. Kenworthy, K. Ridout, S. Kenyon, B. Coons. Mr. Mrs. C. Alexander; P. Cronauer, R. M. Kilmer, M. Cavett, V. Hilt, D. Willson, L. T. Beil, D. Rudolph, K. L. Rose, B. Anabel, J. VanOss, D. P. Brewer, V. French, M. Merrick, N. Boyse, C. Whidden, W. Quast, S. Guthrie. IV APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of September 6th and Special Workshop Meetings of September 7th, 8th, and 9th. Councilman Sargent moved to accept and place on file the minutes of the regular meeting of September 6, 1988. Councilman Gabriel seconded and the motion, which carried unanimously. Councilman Sargent moved to accept and place on file the minutes of the special meetings of September 7th, 8th, and 9th. Councilman Lemon seconded. Councilman Stamon offered a correction to the minutes of September 8th, Register Page 1126, paragraph 9, striking the words "Councilman Stamon stated" and replacing it with Councilman Sargent stated. On call for the question, the motion carried unanimou -ly 1. Request for Payment to Riddell. Willial:.s of S1.2;3.78 far Legal Representations on WPPSS Issues K Councilman Gabriel moved to authorize payment of the June 1, 1988. Riddell, Williams bill in the total amount of $1,228.78 for Legal representation in the WPPSS issues. Councilman Lemon seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 2. Consideration of Increase in Cost of Hydro -Geo Study at Landfill Councilman Stamon informed Council the issue had been discussed by the Utility Advisory Committee and it was their recommendation that this item be tabled to enable staff to provide further information to the UAC. She then moved to table the issue. Councilman Lemon seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 3. Consideration of Bid Award for Eighth Street Bridge Repairs Councilman Sargent moved to accept the bid from Cedar Ridge Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $22,690 and a contract be issued for repairs to the Eighth Street Bridges. Councilman Stamon seconded. Council and staff discussed further some of the issues regarding the wording of the contract. On call for the question, the motion carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 1133 4. Consideration of Bid Award for Water Mains 18th Street (Owens to "0 and Park Avenue (Washington to Porter) Councilman Stamon moved to concur with the recommendation of the Public Works Department and award the bid to Lydell Construction, Inc., in the amount of $61,875 and a contract be issued for the replacement of water lines at 18th Street (Owens to "0 and Park Avenue (Washington to Porter). Councilman Hallett seconded. On call for the question, the motion carried unanimously. 5. Consideration of Bid Award for the Sewer Root Foaming Eouinment Councilman Stamon stated this issue was also discussed by the Utility Advisory Committee and they unanimously recommended the purchase of the equipment with installations by City crews. She then moved to authorize the purchase of the root foaming unit with installation by City crews. Councilman Lemon seconded and the motion carried unanimously. VI CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Stamon moved to adopt the Consent Agenda as presented, including (1) Request permission to call for bids Race Street Signals at First and Front Streets (UAB resignalization); (2) Correspondence from Washington State Liquor Control Board; (3) Vouchers of $1,244,523.43; and (4) Payroll of 9 -4 -88 of $254,935.39. Councilman Sargent seconded and the motion carried unanimously. VII ITEMS FROM THE AUDIENCE TO BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA Carl Alexander, 1712 West Fifth Street, addressed the Council and the audience, reminding people to vote. He also questioned Item 20 on the Agenda under Legislation, Consideration of Adopting Policies Regulating Adult Entertainment, asking whether there would be a public hearing process regarding this issue. Councilman Stamon stated there would be. Mr. Alexander also requested that Items 15 and 16, dealing with the Council vacancy and the advisory ballot, be opened for public comment. Tom Leinart, 3002 South Peabody Street, made several comments regarding Items 15 and 16 on the Agenda dealing with the Council vacancy and the call for the advisory ballot, stating he is not for or against either of the proposed candidates. However, it was his opinion that the Council was elected to make decisions in the community's best interest and he believed these decisions could be made in two ways: Either by conscience or by consulting the electorate; and he had hoped that the decision dealing with the new Councilmember will use both, preferably more with the electorate than with the conscience. Further, he stated he did not feel it was right for the Council to charge the citizens $5,000 to $6,000 to make that decision. He believed the decision the Council was to make possibly was equal to that decision made by Council on the City Hall issue, pointing out that the public spoke after the decision was made by electing three new Councilmembers. He believed also the public will speak again when the elections come in 1989. He asked that if public comment should be warranted between now and January, 1989, that those members who may find their decision not to be the will of the people would also submit their resignations prior to January, 1989, so an entire Council may be elected. Ruth Dorr, 416 East llth Street, also requested public comments on the same issues. VIII LEGISLATION 1. Public Hearings A. Consideration of Resolution for Abatement Mayor McPhee opened the public hearing at 7:22 P.M comment, he then closed the public hearing at 7:24 Resolution by title, entitled of Overgrown Lots There being no public P.M. He then read the 1134 CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 26 -88 A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, declaring the existence of a public nuisance and requiring the elimination of such nuisance. Councilman Stamon moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. Councilman Sargent seconded and the motion carried unanimously. B. Resolution for the Street Vacation Request STV- 88(716- Cronauer /Whitman Mayor McPhee opened the public hearing at 7:28 P.M. Doris Willson, 3022 South Laurel Street, Chairman, Environment Committee, Soroptomists Jet Set, thanked Council for giving her the opportunity to discuss this issue, stating the Committee is committed to the development of the Waterfront Trail. Mrs. Willson read a letter written to Richard Wight, Chairman of the Planning Commission, from the Committee regarding the Cronauer /Whitman street vacation. At present there is extensive clearing from the foot of Francis Street down to the waterfront; so much so that the side of the Trail at the foot of Francis Street has been raised approxi- mately four feet. Because of the commitment of the City to the Trail system, the organization felt it would be wrong to vacate Caroline Street which could possibly encourage additional erosion down onto the Trail. Further, the letter stated the Committee is not against the development of the private property, but because of the observation of what has happened, the Committee felt the Council should exercise extreme caution in granting permits for development of property along the shoreline. Dr. Vance Bingham, 323 Vashon, provided Councilmembers with a letter regarding the vacation, stating his primary concern is with trails, and in reference to this proposal, he felt it was very important for Council to understand there are three trails involved in this issue. The Parks Department proposed a trail in 1980 to follow Caroline Street, which would descend down a bank on Francis Street and back up again, if Caroline Street had been continued; also the trail up Francis Street from the waterfront. Finally, there is a very important extension of the Waterfront Trail toward Rayonier. He then read his letter to the Council. The main points of the letter were to request City Council action to either: (A) approve the request to vacate a portion of Caroline Street; or (B) return the issue to the Planning Commission for further consideration. His proposal is to grant the request to vacate a portion of Caroline Street subject to the following provisions: (1) The City will retain surface rights to the north half of Caroline Street by easement. This would allow for any trails to Caroline from Francis and for a small park on Caroline, and east of Francis Street. (2) The City to secure an easement across the Cronauer property along the old railroad grade in order to accommodate a trail from Francis Street toward Rayonier Mill. Said trail to be a continuation of the Waterfront Trail that leads east from the Red Lion. The advantages to the City would be: (1) Payment for the vacated property; (2) Additional taxes for the vacated property; (3) Easement across the Cronaue' property for the Water- front Trail continuing toward Rayonier Mill. Further, the letter states the recommendation to turn down the request appears to be based on the concern for trails and parks, which are part of the 1980 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and a failure to show sufficient value to the City to make the vaca- tion desirable. At the hearing, no real consideration was given to the value of an easement from Francis Street east along the waterfront. This is approximately 400 feet across private land, secured by a fee simple title. There is a need for the petitioner to confer with the parties opposing the vacation of Caroline Street to see if an agreement that meets the goals of all parties can be reached. However, it is believed this proposal, as presented, would achieve the goals of all parties. Rosemary Cockrill, 1162 Marsden Road, also an owner of property along Caroline Street, stated the proposed trail should not, in any way, be endangered; also there should be no vacation of Caroline Street which would infringe on Francis Street because all of the existing streets that go north to the waterfront should be left open at the end, and she hated to see anything done that would change the situation. -3- Mayor McPhee then closed the public hearing at 7:37 P.M. 1135 CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 Donald E. Rudolph, 1013 East Third Street, stated it would be nice to save part of our waterfront for the people, as there is very little area where the community can go and have access to the beach. Councilman Stamon posed a question to Attorney Knutson regarding the suggestion of considering a vacation in exchange for grant of easement across a piece of property which is not contiguous and is not a part of this particular vacation request, and asked if there was a problem legally requesting easement across properties that are not part of the subject vacation. Attorney Knutson stated if the property owner requesting the vacation wants to grant an easement on some other property, as long as the property is equivalent to the necessary value, it would be legally appropriate. Councilman Sargent stated, in view of the other consideration that were presented, she moved to return the issue to the Planning Commission for further consideration. Councilman Stamon seconded for the purposes of discussion. Councilman Stamon questioned why this issue did not come forward as part of the Planning Commission deliberation. Planner Carr stated Dr. Bingham had appeared at the Planning Commission meeting, expressing support of the street vacation. Councilman Stamon asked if the issue was discussed at all by the Planning Commission. Planner Carr stated he did not believe the suggestion of the trade was brought up at the Planning Commission meeting, although he believed Dr. Bingham did bring up the fact that the potential was there. Dr. Bingham stated the proposal was never put into the Planning Commis- sion's packet. Councilman Stamon questioned Dr. Bingham if he did, in fact, make this recommendation or suggest in any way to the Planning Commission at that time that they ought to consider some other type of an easement in exchange for vacation. Dr. Bingham stated no. Councilman Stamon asked Dr.Bingham if there was a reason why he did not do that at that time. He stated he was not aware of this vacation until just recently. Councilman Hallett stated he would not be in favor of the motion as the public hearing afforded due process and the applicant has had a reasonable amount of time to prepare some alternatives. On call for the question, the motion was denied, with Councilman Sargent voting "Aye and Councilmen Lemon, Gabriel, Stamon, Hallett and Mayor McPhee voting "No Councilman Lemon then moved to recommend vacations+of the subject right -of- way, subject to the following conditions: (1) Public access for the Trail was retained across the subject right -of -way; (2) A deed restriction affecting development on the subject right -of -way because of the topography was attached; (3) With retention of a public access easement, vacation would comply with Circulation Policy No. 10; (4) Vacation would not affect residential safety and the one interior lot could be provided access through subsequent actions by the applicant, such as platting; (5) The City will retain surface rights to the north half of Caroline Street by easement. This will allow for any trails to Caroline from Francis and for a small park on Caroline, east of Francis Street; (6) The City to secure an easement across the Cronauer property along the old railroad grade in order to accommodate a trail from Francis Street toward Rayonier Mill. Said trail to be a continuation of the Waterfront Trail that leads east from the Red Lion. Councilman Gabriel seconded for the sake of discussion. Councilman Lemon stated in looking at this issue, the applicant is willing to give access for the bike trail, if need be, as well as a deed restriction on the development of the subject right -of -way which would allow for the -4- 1136 CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 viewpoint to exist, and he felt the trade of the subject right -of -way for an easement was an excellent idea. Councilman Stamon stated she was reluctant to take action on an issue which has had new information presented without referring that information back to the Planning Commission, which is the acting body on such an issue, and she felt this would be the appropriate action for the Council to take. Councilman Lemon stated the only new issue brought forth was the trade of the easement for the subject right -of -way, and he felt it would be in the best interests of the City to accept the proposal, as he felt it to be a win -win situation because the viewpoint would still be there, a park could be built, and we are adding onto the Waterfront Trail. Councilman Hallett asked if it would be in order to offer a substitute motion. Attorney Knutson stated he did not believe it would be in order and he advised Council to take action on the motion on the floor. Councilman Sargent was in favor of referring the issue back to the Planning Commission, as she did not feel comfortable in voting on the issue until the Planning Commission has had the chance to further review the new issues. Councilman Gabriel stated he had not been presented with enough reasons to deny the street vacation, but because there have been a number of concerns voiced by the Council he withdrew the second on the motion and was in favor of referring the issue back to the Planning Commission. The motion then died for lack of a second. Councilman Sargent then moved to return the issue to the Planning Commission for further consideration. Councilman Gabriel seconded. Councilman Stamon requested that the motion also include the identification of such issues as exactly what the exchange of right -of -way would entail; what type of deed restrictions would be attached on the right -of -way to ensure that the topography in the area is protected; what types of plans would be submitted for access to those interior lots that will not have street access as a result of the vacation. Councilman Hallett then directed a question to Doris Willson, asking if she had heard anything which would convince her that there is enough informa- tion to consider the issue again by the Planning Commission. Mrs. Willson stated the material presented, she felt, would be an excellent move on the part of the City. On call for the question, the motion carried with Councilman Lemon and Mayor McPhee voting "No 2. Plannine Commission Minutes of August 24. 1988 (Continued from ,September 6. 1988) Councilman Stamon moved to set a public hearing for the October 4, 1988, City Council meeting, to consider an ordinance amending the Zoning Code to allow adult care facilities in residential districts. Councilman Lemon seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Stamon moved to accept and place on file the Planning Commission minutes of August 24, 1988. Councilman Hallett seconded and the motion carried. 3. PlanninE Commission Minutes of September 14, 1988 Councilman Sargent moved to accept and place on file the Planning Commission minutes of September 14, 1988. Councilman Stamon seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 4. Consideration of Ordinance Implementing Billing for Services for Medic I to Non -Citv Residents Mayor McPhee read the Ordinance by title, entitled ORDINANCE NO. 2510 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, instituting a user fee for non resident users of the Port Angeles Medic I Program and amending Section 1 of Ordinance 2381, Section 1 of Ordinance 2274, and Sections 8.36.030 and 8.36.040 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. 1137 CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 Councilman Sargent moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. Councilman Lemon seconded. Councilman Hallett questioned Fire Chief Glenn as to what net gain the City would receive. Chief Glenn responded it would be approximately $15,000. Councilman Hallett questioned Chief Glenn as to the image situation. What would be the image the City would convey to non residents or visitors since this is no longer a service that the City provides free of charge. Chief Glenn responded this particular issue had been discussed at length at the Medic I Advisory Board meeting and it was found the City of Port Angeles is the only area within the County that does not charge for services of Advanced Life Support and Basic Life Support transports. Therefore, he believed it was an image already established throughout the County. Councilman Stamon questioned Chief Glenn hypothetically, if a high school student was injured during a team sport event and the aid car was called out but there was no transport, would there be a charge? Chief Glenn responded there is no charge for services of the Paramedics unless there is a transport involved. Council and staff discussed the issue regarding collection of accounts for the billings and whether or not we had sufficient staff to take care of the issue. Councilman Stamon stated she was in support of the concept and felt it was a good idea; however, she was concerned with the collection of debts and those types of situations. She stated she would be more comfortable if Council could see more clearly what type of system would be used for the collection of debts from those people who refused to pay. Mayor McPhee stated the billing volume would not be very significant. Cur- rently, the situation of transport is approximately eight a month, which is one every four days. After further discussion by staff and Council, the question was called and the motion carried with Councilmen Hallett and Stamon voting "No Councilman Sargent moved to authorize staff to publish the summary of the Ordinance. Councilman Lemon seconded and the motion carried. 5. Consideration of Contract with Clallam County for Senior Center (Continued from September 6. 1988) Councilman Sargent moved to approve the contract`'in concept and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract with Clallam County if it is accepted by the County without material change. Councilman Stamon seconded and the motion carried. 6. Consideration of Lease with U. S. Coast Guard for City Pier Councilman Stamon moved to approve the lease and authorize the Mayor to sign the lease documents. Councilman Hallett seconded. Councilman Sargent added a friendly amendment to state the period would be from the first of October, 1987, to September 30, 1989. Councilmen Stamon and Hallett concurred. On call for the question, the amended motion carried unanimously. 7. Consideration of Partial Funding for Scoreboard and Timing Equipment for William Shore Memorial Pool Councilman Stamon moved Council concur with the recommendation and agree to provide the main funds which are necessary for scoring and timing equipment for the William Shore Memorial Pool from the City's Current Expense Reserve Fund. Mayor McPhee asked if there was a dollar amount. Manager Flodstrom -6- 1138 CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 stated the estimated cost to the City would be about $3,000, and he sug- gested that Council allow the use of one of the City's accounts as a clearing account to purchase the equipment and then receive into that account for reimbursement the outside funds as the equipment is received. He stated all the parties and the service clubs have agreed to proceed in that manner if Council so desires. The final cost to the City estimated to be $3,000, which would not be reimbursed cost but would be the City's share of the project. Councilman Stamon stated she would like to see that as an amendment to the motion. Councilman Hallett seconded. Following some discussion on the issue, Councilman Lemon questioned Manager Flodstrom as to why the Hotel /Motel Tax revenue was not used. Manager Flodstrom stated he did not feel it clearly fit into the definition of the Hotel /Motel Tax Fund guidelines, although there is some element of tourism support. Councilman Lemon stated instead of placing a dollar figure on the contribution, could we not state we would contribute up to $3,000 and request that the Booster Club go back and try to raise the funds. Councilman Stamon stated it was the intent of her motion. Following further discussion, the question was called and the motion carried with Councilman Gabriel and Mayor McPhee voting "No 8. Consideration of Reallocating Funds to Recvclina Activities (Continued from September 6. 1988) Councilman Sargent stated she had requested this issue be brought up, as businesses in the City of Port Angeles have been requesting cardboard recycling containers and the City is, at present, unable to supply them. She then moved the Council use the previously budgeted but unspent funds in the Solid Waste Budget to purchase approximately $3,000 of commercial cardboard recycling containers. Councilman Hallett seconded. Councilman Stamon offered a friendly amendment to include a number of elements in the unspent funds, those being "Cans for Kids" program at a cost of about $500 for the first year; school paper recycling program, at a cost of $100; office paper recycling program, $100; and the City Hall recycling project, $200; for a total of $900; and she would like to see those areas authorized as well, so the City could immediately start working on the project. This amendment was not accepted. Councilman Gabriel stated he would like to see the issue referred back to the Citizens' Recycling Committee. Councilman Stamon then offered another friendly amendment to authorize the expenditure of up to $4,000, based on the recommendation of the Citizens' Recycling Committee as to what the others would be. Councilman Sargent concujred. Councilman Sargent stated she believed it was time that the City, as a whole, start recycling and lead the way, and further, the City should be an example to the rest of the community. The motion then restated: Councilman Sargent moved to authorize the use of previously budgeted but unspent funds in the Solid Waste Budget to purchase approximately $3,000 of commercial cardboard recycling containers, and an additional $1,000 to be spent as the Citizens' Recycling Committee would feel is best from the list of projects they have submitted to the Council. Mayor McPhee questioned how many containers this would purchase. Public Works Director Pittis stated it would be approximately 12. Mayor McPhee stated when he needed a container approximately 8 years ago, he just made one himself. It was his concern Council was spending another $3,000. Mayor McPhee asked where would these containers be placed. Councilman Sargent responded to any business who would ask for them; that the Solid Waste Division does have a list of businesses waiting and they cannot supply them because they do not have the funds available to purchase them. On call for the question, the amended motion carried with Mayor McPhee voting "No -7- CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 BREAK Mayor McPhee then recessed the meeting at 8:35 P.M. for 15 minutes. 9. Consideration of Easement for Budget Rent A Car 1139 Councilman Stamon moved to grant the easement and to authorize the Mayor to sign. Councilman Gabriel seconded. On call for the question, the motion carried unanimously. 10. Consideration of Tree Removal (Loeaine) Section of City's Morse Creek Property Councilman Stamon abstained from this issue due to a potential conflict of interest of a financial nature. Attorney Knutson advised Councilman Stamon it would be appropriate to not vote on this matter. Councilman Sargent questioned Manager Flodstrom as to what dollar amount the City would be receiving for the stumpage, and also if he had any further information to provide Council on this particular issue. Manager Flodstrom stated he has had the opportunity to visit the proposed logging site and gave Council a brief background. However, he has not been able to contact Mr. Burrowes who is the owner of Burrowes Logging and therefore is not able to give a specific dollar amount, stating further there would be a need to consult a person with a timber cruising background to ensure the merits of the cruise being done by the logging company. Manager Flodstrom further stated the reason Burrowes and Fox is suggesting we may want to log this particular stand of timber at this time is because they are going to be in the area logging their own 40 -acre parcel immedi- ately adjacent to the City's parcel, and once this property has been logged Burrowes and Fox do not anticipate any logging in the immediate area until they are ready to log the property again. Also, the logging company will be logging in compliance with the Forest Practices Act because of their proximity to Morse Creek and Lake Creek and they will be reforesting, as they have in the past, on their own lands. A contract could and would be negotiated with them that would include some provisions for protection of the surrounding area as well as some insurance coverage. Following further discussion on some of the information, Councilman Lemon asked Manager Flodstrom if he felt there would be any impact on Morse Creek by the logging. Manager Flodstrom stated with adherence to the Forest Practices Act, he did not feel there would be any impacts on Morse Creek or Lake Creek, but this would be subject to significant changes in the weather. He stated the Forest Practices Act might limit their ability to do this activity in those types of weather. Mayor McPhee stated the City has had these trees for approximately 50 years and they are becoming more rare as time goes by, and he felt it would be a nice gesture if Council left them as a gift to the future. Councilman Lemon stated he appreciated Mayor McPhee's comment; however, there is a point when old growth timber reaches its maturity and then rots and just falls over, as is happening in the Nationf."1 Forests. Manager Flodstrom stated there probably are foresters in the area who could assist the City in doing several things: (1) Determine the condition of the trees and the status of the trees now and into the future; (2) Help the City Manager to assess the cruise information from Burrowes and Fox; and (3) Assist the City in establishing an appropriate price and the best way to set that price, either on the stump or across the scale. Councilman Stamon asked Attorney Knutson if it would be appropriate for her to interject a few comments to help Council with its deliberation over the cost of a forester and obtaining a cruiser report. Attorney Knutson stated he felt that was appropriate. Councilman Stamon stated Council could probably obtain information from a cruiser report for less than $500. 1140 CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 Councilman Hallett moved to authorize the City Manager to negotiate with a forester for information needed on the property, not to exceed $500, and to bring information back to Council at the October 4th meeting for considera- tion of entering into a contract with Burrowes Logging. Councilman Gabriel seconded. Councilman Sargent stated we should be very careful about not causing any erosion on Morse Creek. On call for the question, the motion carried with Mayor McPhee voting "No" and Councilman Stamon abstaining. 11. Consideration of Chamber of Commerce Letter Re: Revolving Loan Fund Review Board Councilman Sargent moved to increase the positions of the Committee from seven to eight by adding the Chamber of Commerce. Councilman Gabriel seconded for the purpose of discussion. Councilman Sargent stated when Council had taken action on this originally, the feeling was that the position of a representative from a local business organization would be inclusive of the Chamber as well as the other positions. However, she felt even though there may be these particular people on the Committee, they will not be representing the Chamber of Commerce and she felt it was important for the Chamber to be represented. Mayor McPhee was in agreement with Councilman Sargent's statement. After further discussion of the issue, the question was called and the motion carried with Councilmen Stamon and Hallett voting "No 12. Consideration of Citizens Who Have Expressed Interest in Serving on the Revolving Loan Review Board Councilman Lemon moved to continue recruiting applicants. Councilman Gabriel seconded for the purpose of discussion. Councilman Lemon stated the reason for his motion was Council has just added another category, and also he has a person interested in the bank /loan officer category who has been unable to provide an application to the City. Mayor McPhee stated some of the applicants do not reside within the City of Port Angeles and asked Council if they wanted to consider such applicants. Councilman Sargent stated she did not. Councilman Stamon said she was a little wary of extending the application period, with the exception of maybe the bank /loan officer position since Councilman Lemon does have an interested party. She stated she could accept placbng a hold on that particular position and she suggested Council put on hold the bank /loan officer category, the Chamber category, and the local business organization, and go ahead and appoint a realtor, broker, financial adviser and the citizen at large position. Councilman Lemon stated this was a decision that need not be made in haste. Councilman Stamon offered a friendly amendment to continue recruiting for the bank /loan officer position until the October 4, 1988, City Council meeting. Councilmen Lemon and Gabriel concurred. On call for the question, the amended motion carried unanimously. Councilman Stamon moved Council delay consideration of the issue until the first Council meeting in November to allow time for interviews and to also ensure that all members of Council will be present and able to participate in the appointment process, with the understanding that the application period is closed except for the category of bank /loan officer, which will be open until October 4, 1988. Councilman Gabriel seconded. Councilman Stamon included in the motion to exclude non residents. Councilman Gabriel concurred. On call for the question, the motion carried unanimously. -9- 13. Consideration of Pole Rental Agreement With P.A. Telecable Councilman Stamon stated the issue was considered at the UAC meeting and discussed the issue at great length. Some changes were made to the rate formula. There were also several other changes made, in addition to the rate formula. (1) Clarification of the language with respect to removing of Telecable services; (2) Term of the agreement is 15 years; (3) A phase -in over a three -year period: 75% of the cost the first year, 80% the second year and 90% the third year. Craig Miller, attorney representing Telecable, stated Telecable agrees with the form of the contract as presented. Councilman Stamon moved to authorize the Mayor to enter into a pole rental agreement with Port Angeles Telecable. Councilman Gabriel seconded. On call for the question, the motion carried unanimously. 14. Consideration of Cable TV Franchise Transfer Mayor McPhee read the Resolution by title, entitled RESOLUTION NO. 27 -88 A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, consenting to the transfer of cable television franchise and the assign- ment of a pole rental agreement from Port Angeles Telecable, Inc., to Northland Cable Television, Inc. 1141 CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 Councilman Stamon stated the UAC considered this issue and recommends the passage of the Resolution to approve the Telecable franchise transfer. Craig Miller, attorney for Port Angeles Telecable, introduced Steve Friedman, Divisional Vice President for Northland Cable Television, Inc., to Council. Mr. Friedman addressed the Council, giving a few brief comments, stating Northland is very pleased with the opportunity to serve the community of Port Angeles and their goal is, has been, and always will be, quality service to the customers and to continue to provide the service that Telecable has been providing for the past years. Councilman Sargent asked Mr. Friedman if he anticipated any cost increase of the service to the consumer. Mr. Friedman stated it is safe to say costs do go up. However, the company has no plans at this point and he assured Councilman Sargent the company's rates tend to be a little lower in the area. Councilman Stamon moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. Councilman Gabriel seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 15. Consideration of Citizens to Fill Council Vacancy Councilman Stamon stated she had requested this item be brought before the Council again for consideration and urged Council to receive another ballot. Ruth Dorr, 416 East llth Street addressed Council on the issue, stating she had taken a random telephone poll of 30 people, picking the names from the telephone directory, and asked those people two questions: (1) Are they a registered voter; and (2) Would they like Mr. Hordyk appointed to the Council. From that random poll she received nine yeses in favor of Mr. Hordyk and 21 people in opposition. She questioned Council as to why they felt Mr. Hordyk was acceptable when there were positions open on the Council a year ago and he did not run. She questioned Councilman Lemon. Council- man Lemon stated Mr. Hordyk would have to answer that question. Mrs. Dorr then posed the question to Mr. Hordyk. Mr. Hordyk stated he did not feel it was an appropriate question at this time. Mayor McPhee interjected, stating four years ago Mr. Hordyk did run a low profile campaign and he lost by approximately 150 votes. Mayor McPhee stated briefly he did not know all the reasons why Mr. Hordyk chose not to run; however, Council does need an experienced man and he felt Mr. Hordyk had that experience. -10- 1142 CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 Mrs. Dorr stated Councilmen Lemon, Gabriel and Sargent had a lot of outside experience to bring to the Council and it was the people of the community who felt they were mature enough to make the decisions Council needs to make or they would not have been elected. And yet Mayor McPhee is asking for a person with previous Council experience. Why not bring a fresh face on and let them learn, along with Councilmen Lemon, Sargent and Gabriel, as well as the rest of the Councilmembers, stating in closing that they all have to learn. Following additional discussion between Mrs. Dorr and Mayor McPhee, Council- man Stamon rose to a point of order, stating Council has asked for members of the public to give Council input and she felt the discussion was leading into an adversarial confrontation. Vonda French, 607 South Chase Street, spoke against the advisory ballot as she felt since there was an election in 1989 it would be proven out at that election. She spoke in favor of appointing John Hordyk to the Council vacancy. Werner Quast, 3800 Park Knoll Drive, gave Council an explanation as to why Mr. Whidden was appointed to the Council after his defeat. He told Council the people had voted on an advisory ballot regarding whether Northern Tier should be brought into Port Angeles and the majority had voted against Northern Tier. After the Council was informed that then Councilmember Harold Buck would be resigning from the Council to fill a position at EDC, they felt obligated during the appointment process Council to choose a person to fill the position who was against the oilport as opposed to someone who was pro oilport. That person was Charles Whidden and that, he stated, was the story of the defeated primary candidate. He gave Council a brief overview of some of the events which had taken place during the time Mr. Hordyk was seated on the Council, speaking most specifically to Council- men Gabriel and Lemon. He urged Council to read through the minutes from 1970 through 1983; especially 1971, 1973 and 1976, 1980, 1981, 1983, where the City was dealing with the WPPSS situation. At that time Mr. Hordyk and then Councilmember Dick Wray were considered experts on the public power matters. He urged Council to look at the voting records of these two Councilmembers, look at their urgings, and to look at where the City is now, just settling a WPPSS case for $1.8 million and additional costs for attorney fees, bringing the total to $2.4 million. He went into detail regarding this situation. In closing, Dr. Quast stated Mayor McPhee, Councilmen Gabriel and Lemon have talked about a conservative agenda. He stated he has no problem with the conservative agenda; however, he is concerned with a McPhee agenda. He stated he believed a person who has lived in the City of Port Angeles for 12 years and has served in a Councilmanic position in Aberdeen is just as qualified, has just as much expertise and does not carry the burdens of perhaps some prejudices. He urged Council to take this into consideration, for the benefit of the City. Tom Spencer, 814 South Valley Street, addressed Council, urging them to get on with City business, to appoint a citizen to the Council vacancy, stating he felt they were wasting too much time. Evelyn Saar, 1432 West llth Street, spoke on beharf of John Hordyk, stating she believed there have been mistakes made on this Council as there have been made by previous Councils. She urged Council to support John Hordyk and appoint him. Councilman Hallett, as a point of information, stated it was past 10:00 and moved to continue the Agenda. Councilman Stamon seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Mayor McPhee then directed Clerk Maike to receive a ballot. Ballot One: Councilman Gabriel voted for John Hordyk. Councilman Hallett voted for Prosper Ostrowski. Councilman Lemon voted for John Hordyk. Mayor McPhee voted for John Hordyk. Councilman Sargent voted for Prosper Ostrowski. Councilman Stamon voted for Prosper Ostrowski. 1143 CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 Councilman Sargent spoke a few words regarding why she is voting the way she is, stating she is willing to open up the voting to any other applicants that have applied; that she is willing to do anything to make this a Council decision. However, her feelings regarding Mr. Hordyk are that 16 years is too long to serve on the City Council, stating the voters have advised that eight years is long enough; and appointing a person who was defeated in the election would not be a wise choice in replacing Councilman Hesla. In her opinion, Mr. Hordyk has a conflict of interest and excess baggage to bring to Council. Therefore, she cannot change her vote to appoint him. As far as experience, the voters said they wanted the three new Councilmembers without previous council experience, but the candidates brought a lot of business and world experience with them. Further, she stated her platform has been criticized by the Mayor; however, she has reviewed her statements and the speeches made during her campaign and of those issues, she has accomplished spearheading the beautification of the City, working on the Recycling Committee, eliminated $600,000 from the budget, and various other accomplishments. Councilman Sargent stated she has addressed every item she said she would and she did not feel she needed to apologize to anyone. She has been fair and has listened to the people. Councilman Hallett stated the subject of budgets seems to keep recurring, and it is interesting to note, if you review the General Fund, which is the taxpayer- supported fund, from the period of 1969 through 1984, the General Fund increased on an average of 10.2% per year, which means the budget supported by the taxpayers increased on an average of 10% a year. Also, since 1985, when there was a change in Council, the budgets increased 5.57. Last year the increase was 4.6% and in 1987 it was 1.8 Therefore, in speaking of budget experience and a conservative agenda, he believed Council has seen that change did occur after the departure of Mr. Hordyk. Further, he stated the serving of 16 years by Mr. Hordyk may have been good years, and he was sure Mr. Hordyk had done some fine work; however, he agreed with Councilman Sargent's statement that 16 years is too long to serve and urged Council appoint someone new. 16. Consideration of Resolution Calline for Advisory Ballot and ADorovina the Wordine for the Ballot Attorney Knutson gave Council a recap of the steps needed to be taken in order to place an advisory ballot before the electorate, stating, however, the cost was somewhat in dispute. The County Auditor has indicated she thought the cost may be approximately $6,000, but based on contacts the Administrative Services Department has made with the Secretary of State's Office and Municipal Research Services of Washington, they have determined it could be much less. The 1984 primary election ballot, on which the City had one item, cost between $500 and $600, stating the cost is not clear at this time. Attorney Knutson further stated, with regard to having an advisory ballot, it would be strictly advisory. The previous motion of the Council on September 8th regarding the stepping down of the Mayor from the position and the appointed member to step off the Council, could not be made mandatory. In other words, the results of the advisory ballot could not have the effect of making the appointment provisional or interim until the advisory ballot results came in, unless the person who is appointed agrees to resign. Councilman Stamon stated she has a motion she would like to offer and maybe it would help to resolve some of the quandary the Council is facing, because there were some very awkward elements involved with the motion passed at the September 8th City Council meeting. She then moved Council would request the Mayor not make an appointment after the 30 -day limit has expired and Council would cause to be placed on the ballot two names, Prosper Ostrowski and John Hordyk, and that Council allow the citizenry, as a purely advisory ballot with the understanding that it is an advisory ballot, to indicate to Council with their ballots which person they would prefer to see placed on the Council, with a commitment from Council that they would enact the will of the people and that the Mayor could make the appointment immediately after the results of the ballot have been certified. Councilman Hallett seconded for purposes of discussion. Councilman Stamon stated the reason she offered the motion is because Councilmembers feel strongly about their candidates and therefore there is a deadlock on the Council. Further, she believed Councilmembers felt strongly about the preference that Council as a whole make the appointment. -12- 1144 CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 She saw the advisory ballot as a good opportunity for everyone to come away from the appointment feeling comfortable regarding the outcome. Councilman Lemon spoke in opposition to the motion, stating (1) he upholds the State law and (2) a number of years back when people were pleading with the Council to let them voice their opinions regarding City Hall, on an advisory ballot, the request was denied. Larry Leonard, 1030 Olympus Avenue, ballot, stating the citizens had in regarding the City Hall issue and one at that time was because of the cost addressed the issue of the advisory fact pleaded for an advisory ballot of the main reasons they were told no involved. Secondly, he stated he was appalled at the statements of Councilmen Hallett and Stamon that the Coun- cilmembers for Mr. Hordyk would not change their minds. He believed that Councilmen Gabriel, Lemon and Mayor McPhee have stood by their convictions. They feel, right or wrong, that Mr. Hordyk is the person for the job; therefore, they do not have to compromise to get done what they want to get done, and he did not feel it was necessary that they compromise. Lisa Brown, 2242 West 12th Street, stated the honest, moral thing to let the people vote on the issue. This issue has torn up the obviously; no one is willing to compromise, and she urged Council this issue on an advisory ballot. to do is Council, to place On call for the question, the motion failed, with Councilmen Sargent, Hallett and Stamon voting "Aye" and Councilmen Lemon, Gabriel and Mayor McPhee voting "No 17. Consideration of Options for Meeting Citv's Claims and Risk Management Needs Councilman Stamon moved Council to direct the City Manager to proceed with filling the position of Risk Manager. The motion died for lack of a second. Council discussed the three options presented by staff: (1) Discontinue the self- insurance program and revert to conventional insurance; (2) Eliminate the Risk Manager position and contract for services as needed; (3) Continue the program as it is currently done. Following lengthy discussion on the issue and background being provided by Manager Flodstrom and City Light Director Orton, Councilman Hallett moved to continue the Risk Management program as it is currently being done and to fill the position. Councilman Stamon seconded. Following further discussion, on call for the question, the motion carried unanimously. 18. Consideration of Agreement with 3H Cable Communications Consultants for Cable TV Oversight Services Councilman Stamon stated the Utility issue and they recommended Council Communications for a one -year per evaluate and look at the performance issue. Councilman Stamon moved to authorize the execution of a contract with 3H Cable Communications Consultants for a period of one year. Councilman Hallett seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 19. Consideration of Registering the City Logo After some would bring on Friday, registering information. -13- Advisory Committee had considered this enter into a contract with 3H Cable iod. This would enable the City to of the contractor with respect to this discussion of the issue, it was decided that Councilman Lemon the subject up to the Chamber of Commerce during their meeting September 23rd, to determine their feelings regarding the of the logo by the City, and to return to the Council with 20. Consideration of Adopting Policies Regulating Adult Entertainment Councilman Sargent moved to instruct staff to draft an ordinance regulating adult entertainment businesses to include (1) Require registration of owner of employees with City Clerk by providing information such as name, address, 1145 CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 date of birth; (2) Require background check by Police Department as to legitimate public health and safety concerns related specifically to any previous morals or drug- related convictions; (3) Prohibit nude (or topless female) entertainment in establishments where liquor is served; (4) Re- strict nude entertainment to that which is within the category of either non obscene dramatic works, serious scientific or educational purposes, non obscene exhibitions or dances, or non obscene political performances and presentations; (5) Restrict the location of adult entertainment /exotic or nude dancing businesses to locations that are no closer than 2,000 feet from any church or parochial or public school; (6) Restrict nude entertainment to stages or other surfaces raised at least 18 inches above floor level and no closer than six feet from the nearest patron and to persons 18 years or older; (7) Require a $100 license fee; (8) Authorize the Police Department to make inspections necessary to ensure compliance with the ordinance, and bring back the draft ordinance to the Council, at which time a public hearing would be held. Councilman Stamon seconded. Mayor McPhee, posing a question to Attorney Knutson, asked might some applications be made for such businesses during the interim period that the City would be unable to control because there is not an ordinance regulating such businesses? Attorney Knutson stated that is a possibility. Determined on the type of regulations the City may end up with, if a business was to come into town right now, prior to having an ordinance, the City could regulate the type of activity that went on inside the confines of that business if the City decides. However, to try and adopt some regulations along the lines of zoning provisions, that would regulate where in Port Angeles the business could be located, then the City would not be able to retroactively apply that type of regulation to the business. Councilman Stamon questioned whether a moratorium could be placed on those types of businesses, pending the development of an ordinance. Attorney Knutson stated the City could pass an emergency ordinance. Councilman Sargent asked Attorney Knutson if he could clarify the meaning of an "emergency ordinance Attorney Knutson responded the ordinance could spell out some of the conditions, but it would also indicate there basically is not a zone within the City where such businesses would be allowed to locate, pending an amendment to the Zoning Code being processed. He further recommended that this type of ordinance go through the Planning Commission as well as the City Council. The ordinance would be declared an emergency, based on the public interest, and therefore that would allow it to take effect immediately. Councilman Stamon then offered a friendly amendment that Council direct the City Attorney to prepare an emergency ordinance for Council's consideration at the October 4, 1988, City Council meeting, which would basically institute a moratorium in the City of Port Angeles on permitting of this type of activity until such time as a Zoning Code amendment can be processed through the Planning Commission, which will then be considered by Council, or an ordinance which regulates the issue. Councilman Sargent concurred. Carl Alexander, 1712 West Fifth Street, addressed Council on this issue, requesting that when and if the Council adopts or drafts an ordinance for consideration, prior to releasing the document to the public, they make a motion to include a disclaimer on the front of the ordinance so people wanting to review the ordinance may be aware of some of the explicit language contained in the document. On call for the question, the amended motion carried. 21. Consideration of City Council Goals and Obiectives Prioritization and Setting Meeting for Further Review Council reviewed the tabulization of their Goals and updated staff on some of the changes that each member had regarding this information. Following some discussion of the issue a meeting date was set for September 28, 1988, at 7:00 P.M. at City Hall for further review of the Goals and Objectives. -14- 1146 CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 1988 IX CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS /LATE ITEMS CC.25 Manager Flodstrom presented Council with some information regarding the City's property at Seventh and Peabody. Manager Flodstrom brought Council up to date on the terms of the sales agreement, which are subject to Mr. Chapman being able to obtain approval for the housing project he was working on through the FHA. Council had, at that time, given him six months to do so. However, that six month extension on the purchase and sale agreement will expire prior to Council's October 4th meeting. The request Council needs to act upon is an extension of that six month period and the terms of the sales agreement. After further discussion of the issue, Councilman Stamon moved Council approve the extension of the purchase and sale agreement for a six -month period with the understanding that the $5,000 earnest money deposit will become non refundable. Councilman Lemon seconded and the motion carried. Attorney Knutson presented Council with a letter drafted for Mayor McPhee in regard to the illegal use of City -owned garbage containers by a business within the City of Port Angeles. Council directed Mayor McPhee to sign the letter and send it to the appropriate parties. Councilman Stamon, for the benefit of the Council and citizenry, reminded people of the Hazardous Waste Amnesty Day on Saturday, September 24th, at the County Court House from 9 AM to 3 PM, requesting that people who have old chemicals at their residences they may want to get rid of, this would be the appropriate time and place to do so. Councilman Sargent, making reference to Information Agenda Item 14, the memo regarding handicapped parking, asked that information on this be brought before the Council and the recommendations be brought forth for Council's consideration at the meeting after Councilman Sargent's return. Also, Councilman Sargent pointed out Item 7 on the Information Agenda, her request to be temporarily absent from Council meetings, stating she will be attending business in England and will be out of the country for the month beginning September 23rd. XII ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION There was no need for an executive session. XIV ADJOURNMENT Councilman Lemon moved for adjournment. Councilman Sargent seconded and the motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 11:36 P.M. 9.(zeietee. t4tLiftJ Clerk Mayor -15- K 1 Aft Public .L VV Notices ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS City of Port Angeles Project No. 87 -14 Sealed bids will be received by the office of the City Clerk at 321 East Fifth Street, P.O. Box 1150, Port Angeles, Washington 98362, until 2:30 p.m., October 11, 1988, and not later, and will be opened publicly at that time in the City Council Chambers. This contract provides for the improvement of the in- tersections of First /Front and Race Streets. The work con templated to be performed under this contract includes the removal and construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk, driveways, asphalt and con- crete pavement, placement of asphalt treated base and asphalt concrete Class B, in- stallation of pretimed traffic signal system, and other work, all in accordance with the plans, these Special Provisions and the Standard Specifications. Detailed plans and spec- ifications may be obtained from the office of the City Engineer, City of Port Ange- les, upon payment of a non- refundable fee of $20.00. Bidders shall be qualified for the type of work proposed. 1 A Bidder's Construction Ex- perience Form is included in contract documents. All proposals or bids shy be submitted on the pres- cribed form and in the man- ner as indicated in the Pro- posal Requirements and Conditions and said propos- als or bids shall be accompanied by a bid pro- posal deposit in the form of a cashier's check, postal money order, or a surety bond in the amount of five percent (5 of the total amount of the proposal or bid. If a surety bond is used, said bond shall be issued by a surety authorized and registered to issue said bonds in the State of Washington. The City of Port Angeles re- best interest of the City, to postpone the acceptance of roposals or bids and the David T. Flodstrom City Manager Pub.: Sept. 26, Oct. 3. 1988. ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS City of Port Angeles Project No. 87 -14 Sealed bids will be received by the office of the City Clerk at 321 East Fifth Street, P.O. Box 1150, Port Angeles, Washington 98362, until 2:30 p.m., October 11, 1988, and not later, and will be opened publicly at that time in the City Council Chambers. This contract provides for the improvement of the in- tersections of First /Front and Race Streets. The work con- templated to be performed under this contract includes the removal and construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk, driveways, asphalt and con- crete pavement, placement of asphalt treated base and asphalt concrete Class B, in- stallation of pretimed traffic signal system, and other work, all in accordance with the plans, these Special Provisions and the Standard Specifications. Detailed plans and spec- ifications may be obtained from the office of the City Engineer, City of Port Ange- les, upon payment of a non- refundable fee of $20.00. Bidders shall be qualified for the type of work proposed. A Bidder's Construction Ex- perience Form is included in contract documents. All proposals or bids shall that sealed t P eived by the .O. Box 1150, Port Angeles, Wa 988 362. ORDINANCE N(' 2509 the City of I Jack N. Pittis, P.E.I ORDINANCE of the City 321 East Fiftl Director of Public Works Port Angeles relating to City until 2:3( pub Seot. 25. Oct. 2. 1988 seed limits, amending Ordi- day, October ince No. 2286 and adding a furnishing the Provision, Installation, and Training for an Electronic Meter Reading System. Bid sheets, specifications, and instructions to bidders are available from the City Clerk's Office, P.O. Box 1150, Port Angeles, WA 98362. Phone (206) 457 -0411, ext. 118. Sealed bids will be opened at 2:30 P.M., Wednesday, October, 12, 1988, at 321 East Fifth Street, Port Ange- les City Hall. A certified check or bid bond for 5% of the amount of bid shall accompany each bid. The City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all bids or any part thereof. new section to Chapter 10.16 of the Port Angeles Munici- pal Code and declaring a public emergency. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Ordinance No. 2286 and Chapter 10.16 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code are each amended by adding a new section to said Chapter as follows: 10.16.030 Temporary Red- uced Speed Limits. Pursuant to State statute, the Director of Public Works, after con- sultation with the Chief of Police, is hereby authorized to establish reduced speed limits when warranted under emergency or other condi- tions necessary for the pro- tection of the public health, safety and welfare. The reduced speed limits shall remain in effect until the Di- rector of Public Works and ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS City of Port Angeles Regent. Alder and 6th St. PAVING Project Nos. 86 -13, 81 -16 86 -21 Sealed bids will be received by the office of the City Clerk at 321 East Fifth Street. P.O. Box 1150, Port Angeles, Washington 98362, until 2:30 p.m., September 27, 1988, and not later, and will be opened publicly at that time in the City Council Chambers. The contemplated work to be performed under this contract consists of excava- tion, construction of curb and gutter. placement of ballast. crushed surfacing top course. asphalt concrete Class B, trench excavation for the City of Port Angeles, and other work, all in accor- dance with plans, special provisions and standard specifications. Detailed plans and spec- ifications may be obtained from the office of the City Engineer. City of Port Ange- les, upon payment of a non- refundable fee of $20.00. Bidders shall be qualified for the type of work proposed. A Bidder's Construction Ex- perience Form is included in contract documents. All proposals or bids shall be submitted on the pres- cribed form and in the man- ner as indicated in the Pro- posal Requirements and Conditions and said propos- als or bids shall be accom- panied by a bid proposal de- posit in the form of a cash- ier's check, postal money or- der, or a surety bond in the amount of five percent (5 of the total amount of the proposal or bid. If a surety bond is used. said bond shall be issued by a surety auth- orized and registered to is- sue said bonds in the State of Washington. The City of Port Angeles re- serves the right to accept the proposals or bids and award contracts to responsi- ble bidders which are in the best interest of the City, to postpone the acceptance of proposals or bids and the award of the contracts for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days, or to reject any and all proposals or bids received and further adver- tise the project for bids. 9 When awarded contracts, 10 the successful bidder shall 11 promptly execute contracts 12 and shall furnish bonds of faithful performance of the 13 contracts in the full amount 14 of the contract prices. 15 Bids must be sealed with the 16 outside of the envelope 17 marked BID OPENING DATE 18 (September 27, 1988). PROJECT (Regent, Alder and 19 6th St. paving). Name and 20 address of the bidder should Section 2. soc bers, 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, Washington, to consider legislation amending the Zoning Code to conditionally allow senior citizen apartment complexes' and state licensed nursing and group homes in all resi- dential zones, and other similar adult residential care facilities, specially defining and regulating senior center apartment complexes as congregate care centers. LOCATION: All residential zones of the City. RS -7, RS -9 and RMF. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N /A. APPLICANT: CITY OF PORT ANGELES. PROPERTY OWNER: NIA. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PO- LICY ACT (SEPA): A DNS has been filed for this proposal. All interested parties may appear at the hearing and express their opinion on this proposal. DATE: Sept. 21, 1988. Michelle Maike City Clerk I Pub Sent. 23. 1988. ORDINANCE NO. 2508 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles establishing a pay plan for the employees represented by AFSCME Local #1619 (Schedule A), for the period of January 1, 1988, through December 31, 1988, amending Ordinance No. 2478, and providing for the payment thereof. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 2478 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1. Effective January 1, 1988, through December 31, 1988, the wages for the classifications noted below are hereby adopted as follows: SCHEDULE A AFSCME LOCAL #1619 CLASSIFICATION SALARY RANGE Engineering Specialist Field 19 Engineering Specialist Office 19 Street Maintenance Supervisor 19 Treatment Plant Supervisor 19 Associate Planner 18 Building Inspector 18 Maintenance Carpenter 16 Gardener 16 Treatment Plant Operator 16 Leadworker 16 Water Quality Maintenance Tech. II 16 Customer Service Representative 16_ Accountant 3 Engineering Survey Technician Permit Technician Field Service Representative Equipment Operator II Community Service Coordinator Maintenance Worker II Parks Facility Caretaker Water Quality Maintenance Tech. I Drafting Technician Accounting Technician Computer Operator Building Permit Technician Equipment Operator I Meter Reader Maintenance Worker I Senior Cashier Parks Caretaker Custodian Cashier Laborer Landfill Scale Attendant Clerk/Typist Receptionist Switchboard Operator PAY STEP PLAN 1988 16 15 15 14 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 10 10 10 10 9 6 6 6 3 1 be submitted on the pres- cribed form and in the man- ner as indicated in the Pro- posal Requirements and Conditions and said propos- als or bids shall be accompanied by a bid pro- posal deposit in the form of a cashier's check, postal money order, or a surety bond in the amount of five percent (5 of the total amount of the proposal or bid. If a surety bond is used, said bond shall be issued by a surety authorized and registered to issue said bonds in the State of Washington. The City of Port Angeles re- serves the right to accept serves the right to accept the proposals or bids and the proposals or bids and award contracts to responsi- award contracts to responsi- ble bidders which are in the ble bidders which are in the best interest of the City, to postpone the acceptance of proposals or bids and the award of the contracts for a award of the contracts for a period not to exceed thirty period not to exceed thirty (30) days, or to reject any (30) days, or to reject any and all proposals or bids and all proposals or bids received and further adver- received and further adver- tise the project for bids. tise the project for bids. When awarded contracts, When awarded contracts, I the successful bidder shall the successful bidder shall promptly execute contracts promptly execute contracts and shall furnish bonds of and shall furnish bonds of .faithful performance of the faithful performance of the contracts in the full amount contracts in the full amount of the contract prices. of the contract prices. 1 Bids must be sealed with the Bids must be sealed with the outside of the envelope marked the envelope BID OPENING DATE also appear on the outside installments per accounting procedures established by the marked BI 1, OPEN(PR DA OJECT (F ctober ob rst Front 1 &�)RaROJESt of the envelope. Bids should City of Port Angeles, and shall be paid within five (5) October 11, 1988). First /Front Race St. Sgn ^li -t'on� yam�� be addressed to the City working days after the end of the payroll period, or as Signalization). Name and ad- Cle 321 East Fifth Street, soon thereaft er, per procedures established by the City of dress of the bidder should N( P.O. Box 1150, Port Angeles, Port Angeles. also appear on the outside tha Washington 98362. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a of the envelope. Bids should CH Jack N. Pittis, P.E. regular meeting of said Council held on the 6th day of NOTICE OF be addressed to the City put Director of Public Works September, 1988. NOTICE IS I Clerk, 321 East Fifth Street, 4, Pub.: Sent. 11, 18, 1988. SALARY RANGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SALARY STEPS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1224 1261 1299 1337 1378 1419 1462 1261 1299 1337 1378 1419 1462 1505 1299 1337 1378 1419 1462 1505 1551 1337 1378 1419 1462 1505 1551 1597 1378 1419 1462 1505 1551 1597 1645 1419 1462 1505 1551 1597 1645 1695 1462 1505 1551 1597 1645 1694 1745 1505 1551 1597 1645 1694 1745 1797 1551 1597 1645 1694 1745 1797 1851 1597 1645 1694 1745 1797 1851 1907 1645 1694 1745 1797 1851 1907 1964 1694 1745 1797 1851 1907 1964 2023 1745 1797 1851 1907 1964 2023 2084 1797 1851 1907 1964 2023 2084 2146 1851 1907 1964 2023 2084 2146 2211 1907 1964 2023 2084 2146 2211 2277 1964 2023 2084 2146 2211 2277 2345 2023 2084 2146 2211 2277 2345 2416 2084 2146 2211 2277 2345 2416 2488 2146 2211 2277 2345 2416 2488 2563 The above wages shall be paid in bi- weekly (ATTEST: Michelle M. Maike, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Craig D. Knutson, City Attorne Pub.: Sept. 9, 1988. TILE OF SPECIAL MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Port Angeles will hold a special meeting on Wednesday, September 28, 1988 at 7:00 P.M. in City Hall, 321 East 5th Street, Port Angeles, Washington. The purpose of this special meeting is the continued dis- cussion of the Goals and Ob- jectives for 1989 -90 and beyond. The public is invited to attend. Michelle M. Maike City Clerk Pub.: Sept. 23, 1988. Period not to exceed Cl (30) days, of to reject and all proposals or foi received and further ac ar tise the project for I di When awarded contrac p the successful bidder sh sl promptly execute contrac C and shall furnish bonds faithful performance of tt 1 contracts in the hill amour of the contract prices. Bids must be sealed with th outside of the envelop, marked BID OPENING DATE PROJECT (Regent, Alder and 6th St. paving). Name and address of the bidder should also appear on the outside of the envelope. Bids should Clerk, d 321 s t East Fifth Street P.O. Box 1150, Port Angeles, Washington 98362. Jck N. Directo of PublicrW Pub.: Sept. 11. 18. 1988. y Frank McPhee, MAYOR