HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/05/2002 4787
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
November 5, 2002
CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Wiggins called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order
REGULAR MEETING: at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mayor Wiggins, Councilmembers Braun, Campbell,
Erickson, Headrick, Rogers, and Williams.
Members Absent: None.
Staff Present: Manager Quinn, Attorney Knutson, Clerk Upton, B.
Collins, M. Connelly, G. Cutler, D. McKeen, Y.
Ziomkowski, L. Kheriaty, T. Gallagher, D. Millar, P.
Burrett, J. Cole, D. Bellamente, S. McLain, J. Mason, M.
Sanders, L. Doyle, S. Johns, and C. Kochanek.
PubIic Present: B. Monro, G. Kheriaty, R. Andrade, B. Schultz, J.
Bohman, K. Monds, P. Lamoureux, K. Smith, L. Engel, L.
Amundson, T. Price, C. & M. Amundson, M. Gagnon. N.
Creelman, G. Holka, and D. Tschimperle.
PLEDGE OF The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Scout Troop 1990, Scoutmaster Randy
ALLEGIANCE: Gardner.
PUBLIC CEREMONIES, 1. Beautification Award to Chestnut Cottage:
PRESENTATIONS AND
PROCLAMATIONS: Mayor Wiggins presented a Beautification Award to the Chestnut Cottage. The award
was accepted by Ken Nemirow and Diane Nagler.
Beautification Award to
Chestnut Cottage
Introduction of Senior 2. Introduction of Doris "Dee" Bellamente, Senior Center Supervisor:
Center Supervisor
Senior Center Supervisor, Dee Bellamente, was introduced by Parks & Recreation
Director Connelly, after which Ms. Bellameme shared her background and expertise.
Proclamation recognizing 3. Proclamation recognizing Dorothy Duncan's distinguished service to City of
Dorothy Duncan for Port Angeles:
Service to City
Mayor Wiggins read and presented a Proclamation to Dorothy Duncan, honoring her
many years of distinguished service to the City and the community.
Proclamation recognizing 4. Proclamation recognizing George Kheriaty 's Hamilton School 5t~ Graders
George Kheriaty's Recycling Program:
Hamilton School Recycling
Program Mayor Wiggins read and presented a Proclamation to Hamilton School Teacher George
Kheriaty in recognition of the School's recycling efforts. Mr. Kheriaty was
accompanied by students involved in the endeavor, and he then made a brief
presentation, showing pictures of the program at work. Recycling Coordinator Millar
4788 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
November 5, 2002
joined in the recognition, noting the School's efforts had resulted in a savings of $9,000
per year.
Chamber of Commerce 5. Chamber of Commerce Report presented by Russ Veenema, Chamber
Report Executive Director:
Russ Veenema, Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce, presented a quarterly
status report to the Council. Mr. Veenema distributed a spreadsheet reflecting year-to-
date door counts, room taxes, sales taxes, web visits, and town occupancies. He
informed the Council that concentrated efforts have taken place with regard to
marketing the non-summer months, and many of the figures in the spreadsheet reflect
an increase over the previous year. He also distributed copies of two issues of the
Tacoma News Tribute, one focused on a joint marketing cooperative for the entire
North Olympic Peninsula, and the other focused on the Port Angeles History Weekend
event.
Mr. Veenema reflected on the success of the History Weekend, thanking City staff
members Ken Dubuc and Lou Haehnlen for their assistance. He indicated this
particular event involved more volunteers than any other event held thus far, and the
event itself attracted over 500 people. He felt this is a product that can be further
developed in order to create more interest throughout the year in the form of self-tours,
guided tours, and the like. Mr. Veenema asked for the City's assistance by not filling
in the underground, and he offered kudos to the City for its efforts toward historical
preservation in the form of the Carnegie Library, as well as the beautification program.
Jackson Smart, 472 Mount Pleasant Road, dressed in period garb, was one of the tour
guides during the History Weekend. He implored the City to do whatever possible to
preserve its historical sites, as those attending this event had a wonderful time. Mr.
Smart was joined by two "ladies of the evening", who spoke of the successful event and
urged the Council to preserve the underground.
Betsy Schultz, new owner of the Tudor Inn Bed & Breakfast, informed the Council that
she participated in the History Weekend by hosting tours of her historical residence.
She indicated that some guests extended their stay in order to participate, and she
encouraged the City to do everything possible in support of underground tours and
trolley tours.
Mike Millar, who worked as a volunteer during the event, indicated that everyone is
concerned about the last section of the underground on Laurel Street. He offered the
possibility of joint efforts to obtain funding, and he requested the City's ongoing
assistance to increase the number of tours.
Don Perry, a longtime advocate of the underground tours, related the importance of the
tours to the entire Peninsula. He felt the tours will prove to be income producing,
citing the successes in Seattle and Pendleton with similar tours. He asked for the City's
ongoing support.
WORK SESSION: None.
LATE ITEMS TO BE JeffBohman, 3753 Canyon Circle, addressed the Council as President of the Peninsula
PLACED ON THIS OR Trails Coalition. On behalf of the Coalition, Mr. Bohman thanked the Council
FUTURE AGENDAS: members for their support in completing the portion of the Trail through the Rayonier
site. He presented the Council and staff with Coalition lapel pins in appreciation of
their efforts, and he expressed interest in working towards a route out of town on the
west side. Additionally, Mr. Bohman looked forward to working with the area
governmental entities in developing a comprehensive trail management plan.
Bruce Monro, 91 E. Palmer, Sequim, President of the Olympic Peninsula Bicyclists and
-2-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING 4789
November 5, 2002
LATE ITEMS TO BE past member of the Port Angeles Non-Motorized Committee, thanked the Council and
PLACED ON THIS OR staff for completing the extra section of the Waterfront Trail and also for creating the
FUTURE AGENDAS: future bike lanes on "C" Street, as well as the newly created lanes on Race Street,
(Cont'd) Boulevard, and 8th Street. He felt these additions to be a great complement to the
City's "Bicycle Friendly" program.
Jean Martin, a CPA who resides at 120 W. Maple in Sequim, was present as a
representative of the Port Angeles Fine Arts Center Board of Trustees. The Board
appreciates the Council's past support, and Ms. Martin expressed hope for the
Council's continued support in the future. She indicated people from out of town visit
the Center, and the sculpture park is gaining recognition far and wide. Tourists who
spend money in town are being attracted to the facility, and the funds expended by the
City on the Center are being matched by thousands of volunteer hours. Ms. Martin also
offered kudos to City staff and the Center Director, Jake Seniuk.
FINANCE: 1. A ward Contract for "I"Street & Lauridsen Boulevard Sidewalks, Project 22-
03:
Award Contract for "I"
Street & Lauridsen Blvd. Public Works & Utilities Director Cutler briefly summarized the bid information
Sidewalks relative to the completion of the school walking route sidewalk work on the west side
of "I" Street from 12t~ to 16~ Street, as well as on the south side of Lauridsen
Boulevard between Jones and Liberty Streets. Following brief discussion,
Councilmember Rogers moved to award the contract for the "I" Street and
Lauridsen Boulevard Sidewalks, Project 22-03, to Aldergrove Construction of
Port Angeles and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract in the amount of
$234,360.26. The motion was seconded by Councilman Braun and carried
unanimously.
Award for Equipment 2. Equipment Purchase - Parks Department Tractor-Backhoe, Project 22-02-
Purchase - Parks Tractor- 12:
Backhoe
Director Cutler reviewed the information pertinent to the purchase of a Tractor-
Backhoe for the Parks Department. Discussion ensued on thetrade-in of $5,000, the
fact that Public Works and Parks do share equipment whenever possible, and the
reasons the bulk of the bids were determined to be unresponsive. Councilman
Campbell moved to award the bid to the low responsive bidder, Tri-County
Equipment Rentals of Everett, reject all remaining bids as non-responsive, and
authorize the Mayor to sign the contract in the amount of $30,652.67. The motion
was seconded by Councilmember Erickson and carried unanimously.
Award Contract for Front 3. Award Contract for Front Street Waterline, Project 22-19:
Street Waterline
Director Cutler reviewed the bid information for the Front Street Waterline, noting he
was pleased with the amount of local interest generated in the project, plus the fact that
the low bid came in below the Engineer's estimate. Project work should commence in
a week or two. Councilman Braun moved to award the contract for the Front
Street Waterline, Project No. 22-19, to Pilchuck Diversified Services of Bothell
and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract in the amount of $301,766.88.
Councilman Headrick seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Award Contract for 4. Award Contract for Landfill Cell 3 Drainage Improvements, Project 22-29:
Landfill Cell 3 Drainage
Director Cutler reviewed the nature of the project to provide necessary contact water
control and collection facilities to prevent contaminated runoff from leaving the site of
Cell 3 at the Landfill. This was an unanticipated project, which will be funded from
reserves. Brief discussion was held concerning whether the cell is filling sooner than
expected, and Director Cutler felt the activity is fairly well on track to 2006. Following
brief discussion, Councilman Campbell moved to award the contract for the
-3-
4790 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
November 5, 2002
Award Contract for Landfill Cell 3 Drainage Improvements, Project 22-29, to Crescent Development,
Landfill Cell 3 Drainage Inc., of Joyce, to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract in the amount of
(Cont'd) $30,512.40, and to allocate $35,000 from Solid Waste Fund reserves for
construction funding. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Erickson and
carried unanimously.
Structure Abatement 5. Abatement of Structure at 604 S. "B" Street:
Community Development Director Collins reviewed the need for structural abatement
and responded to an inquiry from Mayor Wiggins in that this was a self-built home that
was never completed probably due to lack of resources. The home has deteriorated
over the years and has generated many complaints from area residents. Councilman
Williams queried whether the home was involved in a foreclosure, but he later
determined it was not. Councilmembers observed there is also another structure on the
property, but staff offered assurances that the correct structure would be abated. Brief
discussion followed, after which Councilman I-Ieadrick moved to authorize the
transfer of $4,275.00 to the Repair and Demolition Fund from the General Fund
for the demolition of the commercial building at 604 S. "B" Street in accordance
with the provisions of Chapter 3.27 PAMC. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Braun and carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - 1. Water/Wastewater Rates:
OTHER:
Director Cutler introduced Ms. Angie Sanchez Vimoche from Economic and
Water/Wastewater Rates Engineering Services, the firm retained to conduct an analysis on water and wastewater
rates. The last study was done in 1999, with rate adjustments implemented during the
last three years.
With the use of a PowerPoint presentation, Ms. Vimoche provided an overview of the
rate setting process with comparisons made between the revenues and expenses of the
utility in order to determine the overall level of rate adjustment. The cost of service is
what equitably allocates the revenue requirements between the various customer classes
of service, and the rate design involves the setting of rates for each class of service to
meet the revenue needs of the utility, to include any other rate design goals and
objectives. Ms. Virnoche indicated that each utility is reviewed on a stand alone basis,
and key financial indicators are utilized in terms of reserve balances, capital funding,
and debt service coverage. She reviewed in detail the comparison of costs for the two
utilities from the last rate study to this current study, and she then summarized the three
options developed for consideration.
The third option has been recommended as the option of choice in order to minimize
the rate impact to the customers, that being to assume debt fmancing, use reserves to
a minimumof$4 million, and phase in small rate adjustments over time. Ms. Vimoche
reviewed the Water and Wastewater Utility Capital Projects and Funding §ources and
the Water and Wastewater Utility Revenue Requirementoptions. Option 3 involves
recommended rate increases for the Water Utility in the amount of 4% in 2003, 4% in
2004, and 3% in 2005. No rate increase is being proposed for the Wastewater Utility
at this time. Ms. Virnoche provided monthly bill comparisons for both utilities, using
information from other utilities on the Peninsula, and she reviewed a summary of
proposed metered residential and commercial rates in comparison to those presently
being paid.
Discussion followed, and Finance Director Ziomkowski was asked for input relative
to Option 3. Director Ziomkowski agreed that Option 3 is preferred, as there is benefit
by issuing the debt which should be used only for capital projects and not operations.
Councilman Headrick inquired as to how the amount for reserves is determined, and
Director Ziomkowski responded that the industry standard is to have 45 - 90 days
available in funds for maintenance and operation costs. Ms. Vimoche added that un-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING 4791
November 5, 2002
Water/Wastewater Rates scheduled facilities are also a consideration in this regard.
(Cont'd)
Councilman Williams asked if consideration had been given to a flat 5% increase each
year, and Ms. Vimoche indicated that this study was done for the next 3 years only; any
further long-term projections would prove to be extremely difficult. Councilman
Campbell reflected on comments made at the Utility Advisory Committee meeting in
that there is concern with the economic cycle the City is in at the present time.
However, it is envisioned that the City's economic well being will improve in 3 years,
and it is important to set rates today with the interest of holding rates as low as possible
so that future needs can be met by a better economic climate. Manager Quinn agreed
that a 3-year time frame for setting rates is a reasonable projection period.
Mayor Wiggins opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m.
Paul Lamoureux, 602 Whidby, asked for clarification from Ms. Vimoche as to the
utilization of the rate stabilization fund, after which he maintained the public would be
concerned with the use of reserves. He suggested the possibility of reversing the
increases to 3%, 4%, and 4% respectively over the next 3 years with the hope of
lessening the impact on the reserve fund. Director Ziomkowski indicated this concept
would require further calculations, as an appropriate balance must be maintained. Mr.
Lamoureux indicated he would support Option 3 as proposed, with the caveat that there
be value received for the money spent. He felt there should be an increased amount of
water made available over the base of 100 cu. ft. if the rates are increased. He
suggested the base be revised to 150 cu. ft. in the interest of improving the appearance
of residential yards. Mr. Lamoureux continued that the residents pay to have City
government lawns kept green, so he felt his proposal would serve to also improve the
neighborhoods.
Director Cutler offered caution regarding the notion of adjusting the base and the base
rate, as consideration should be given to low income families, conservation efforts, and
the like. He felt the City has maintained a good balance thus far. However, Mr.
Lamoureuxindicated he had been informed by a City staff member that water is a fixed
cost. Councilman Campbell explained that pumping the water is where the costs are
incurred, and the more water pumped, the higher the costs. Ms. Vimoche added that
every cost the City incurs in the Water Utility is considered in the rates, to include such
matters as infrastructure, utility costs, and fire suppression. This is not just a volume-
related issue. Director Cutler offered further clarification by explaining that even if no
water is used during a cycle, the customer must still pay the base rate. He offered to
meet with Mr. Lamoureux at another time to provide further explanation on the rate-
setting process.
There being no further public testimony, Councilman Braun moved to continue the
public hearing to November 19, 2002, The motion was seconded by Councilman
Williams and carried unanimously.
Break Mayor Wiggins recessed the meeting for a break at 8:10 p.m. The meeting reconvened
at 8:25 p.m.
Budget Hearing on 2. Budget Hearing on Revenue for Year 2003:
Revenue for Year 2003
Using a PowerPoint presentation, Finance Director Ziomkowski submitted the revenue
projections for the 2003 Budget. Total revenues projected are $68,423,978, which
Director Ziomkowskireviewedby source. She reviewed the taxrevenue comparisons,
as well as revenues by fund type. General Fund revenues, which are projected at
$13,101,066, increased by 1.7% as compared to the 2002 budget and 1% as compared
to 2002 estimates. After adjustments for internal cost allocations and reimbursements
for airport security, General Fund revenues actually show a 0.3% decrease.
-5-
4792 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
November 5, 2002
Budget Hearing on Director Ziomkowski summarized issues pertinent toproperty taxes which, by virtue
Revenue for Year 2003 of Initiative 747, are only allowed a 1% increase plus new construction. The property
(Cont'd) tax levy for 2002 was $3.53 per $1,000 and the levy for 2003 is projected at $3.58 per
$1,000, resulting in an increase of $7 annually per a $150,000 house. Director
Ziomkowski informed the Council there are declining trends for sales taxes, utility
taxes, telephone taxes, leasehold taxes, and liquor excise taxes. Because interest rates
are much lower, income from investments will also decrease.
Director Ziomkowski reviewed the budgeted status of other revenue sources, after
which Manager Quinn detailed proposed increases in charges, or user fees, to include
Planning fees for an additional $4,400, building permit fees for an additional $15,000,
and pool fees for an additional $20,000. In addition, to offset the increasing cost of
maintaining various Parks facilities, it is recommendedthere be an athletic field fee of
$7-$10 per player per season. Discussion followed concerning the increased fees, with
staff providing further information and clarification. Director Ziomkowski then
reviewed the anticipated revenues pertinent to the Street Fund, gas taxes, lodging taxes,
and the different utility funds. Noting that 52% of all revenues are derived from utility
rates, she noted there are no rate increases planned at this time for the Electric Utility.
In addition, no increase has been instituted for the Solid Waste Utility since 1994.
Manager Quinn, in reviewing the history of declining revenues, indicated the only
realistic means available to the City to maintain municipal services is through growth
in terms of assessed valuation, population, and total area. The revenue issue is the
driving force in the City's economic development efforts and other entrepreneurial
projects. He noted that other cities have B & O taxes, which is something not currently
done in Port Angeles and may not be realistic for consideration. Manager Quinnfelt
that Port Angeles may have to consider other options for producing revenue, such as
maintenance and operation levies for specific services. Lacking other options, the City
will be forced to decrease the level of services over the next 20 years.
Mayor Wiggins opened the public hearing at 9:14 p.m.
Paul Lamoureux, 602 Whidby, thanked the Council for the hard work on the Budget
preparation. He sought clarification concerning the next public hearing, which Director
Ziomkowski indicated would concentrate on the expense side of the Budget. In
addition, it is expected that the property tax levy would be considered. Mr. Lamoureux
also asked for clarification on the matter of the 1% property tax increase; Manager
Quinn and Director Ziomkowski explained the voter-initiated limitations on property
tax levies. Mr. Lamoureux reminded Council that many residents are impacted by this
increase. He then directed attention to lodging taxes, suggesting an increase could be
accomplished without impact to the amount of tourism in the area. Director
Ziomkowski clarified that the City is receiving a 2% lodging tax from the State via a
reduction in the State's portion of sales tax receipts, plus the City initiated an additional
2%. Everyone staying in a Port Angeles lodge is paying a 10.2% tax. Mr. Lamoureux
felt there is confusion regarding a document in a previous Council packet concerning
assistance with stormwater permitting in a budgeted amount of $25,000 and a
contracted amount of $21,000. He noted the amended contract amount exceeded the
budgeted amount. He felt that, once a budgeted project is bid and the bid comes in
under budget, he felt that should be the final price.
Mike Millar, 1327 E. 1st Street, addressed the matter of decreased leasehold taxes
related to the Westport project. In addition, he advised the Council that, when he did
business in Ocean Shores, he was required to pay a permit fee because he did not live
in Ocean Shores. Mr. Millar suggested a similar policy in the City might help in
generating additional revenue. Brief discussion followed concerning leasehold taxes
and the trade-off in the interest of economic development.
Mayor Wiggins closed the public hearing at 9:29 p.m
-6-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING 4793
November 5, 2002
Mischke Street Vacation - 3. Mischke Street Vacation - STV 02-03:
STV 02-03
Director Collins related to the Council that the applicant is out of town and has asked
that the public hearing be continued until his return. Therefore, Mayor Wiggins opened
the public hearing at 9:31 p.m., and Councilmember Erickson moved to continue the
public hearing to November 19, 2002. Councilmember Rogers seconded the
motion, which carried unanimously.
CONSENT AGENDA: In considering acceptance of the Consent Agenda, Councilmember Rogers directed
attention to Page 1 of the October 15, 2002, City Council minutes, Item 1 under
Finance. She noted the motion lacked a second and a vote. [Clerk's Note: The motion
was seconded by Councilmember Rogers and carried unanimously.] Following
questions concerning the Check List, Councilman Braun moved to accept the
Consent Agenda, to include: 1.) City Council minutes of October 15, 2002 regular
meeting, as corrected, and October 22, 2002 special meeting; 2.) Check register -
October 29, 2002 - $677,381.58; and 3.) Electronic payments - October 25, 2002 -
$1,411,202.00. Councilman Campbell seconded the motion which carried 6 - 0,
with Councilmember Erickson abstaining due to absence from the October 22
meeting.
CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Rogers referenced the North Peninsula Building Association
COMMITTEE newsletter in which an article commended Economic Development Director Smith, the
REPORTS: City Manager, and the Council for efforts in the area of economic development. She
represented the Council at the Leadership Prayer Breakfast and spent a great deal of
time on economic development issues related to the cluster development.
Councilmember Rogers provided public comment before the Sequim City Council
regarding upcoming retail development, she met with representatives of the Fire
Department, and she attended a meeting on Elwha economic development projects.
Councilmember Rogers also spent time with Congressman Dicks who praised the City
for its handling of the project, on dom removal~ she commended Chief Riepe for his
. . e0mme'nts'at Leland'Lee's xfieffioriar service.
On behalf of the City, Councilman Williams attended the groundbreaking for the
expansion of the Boys & Girls Club.
Councilman Campbell, reporting on behalf of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee,
indicated the most recent marketing plan submitted by Randal Ehm was revised to
remove elements of reference to hotel marketing as opposed to marketing the
conference center. The committee agreed with a recommendation of The Chambers
Group that the latest version of the marketing plan should be considered satisfactory
for current needs in order to move on to the next phase, which is allowing Ehm to focus
on the project appraisal, managing and marketing agreements, franchise agreement, and
financing package. A time line will be negotiated with Mr. Ehm for accomplishing
these tasks.
ORDINANCES NOT 1. MCA Ol-02B Sign Code:
REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS: CommunityDevelopment Director Collins referenced a matrix he had distributed to the
Council, identifying by zone and sign type the requirements relative to the amended
MCA 01-02B Sign Code Sign Code. He indicated the main change incorporated is that the City will now permit
Ordinance No. 3126 A-frame signs, as well as temporary commercial signs up to 100 sq. ft. In the case of
billboards, a 300 sq. ft. size limitation has been established, with a 35 foot height limit.
Director Collins indicated that the requirement to affix A-frame signs to sidewalks has
been eliminated. Fluttering devices are permitted, with the exception of those made of
mylar or conductive materials.
Director Collins offered a correction to the draft Ordinance, Page 5, Chapter 14.36.050
Exempt Signs, Section O.: "Signs painted directly on windows, and window signs, ..."
-7-
4794 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
November 5, 2002
ORDINANCES NOT should be corrected to read, "Signs painted directly on windows, and inside window
REQUIRING PUBLIC signs ...." Referencing Chapter 14.36.070 Permitted Signs, Sections D. and £.,
HEARINGS: Director Collins suggested the height of building-mounted signs should be consistent
(Cont'd) between the Commercial Office and Commercial Neighborhood zones. The draft
Ordinance reflected a maximumheight of 20 feet in the CN Zone and 30 feet in the CO
MCA 01-02B Sign Code Zone; Director Collins suggested both height restrictions should be 20 feet.
Ordinance No. 3126
(Cont'd) Director Collins expressed appreciation to the many business groups who assisted in
this effort. Discussion followed concerning off-premise signs, as well as whether
businesses should be required to seek both a Sign Permit and a Right-of-Way Use
Permit and be charged for both of the permits. Councilmember Rogers was of the
opinion that a charge of two fees would be tmacd~ptable. Mayor Wiggins read the
Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 3126
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, creating a new
City-wide Side Code by incorporating the downtown sign code
requirements for commercial, industrial, and institutional signs and adding
new regulations for commercial message signs to include allowances for A-
frame signs, temporary commercial event signs, and electronic messaging
signs and specifications for the maximum size of billboard signs, repealing
certain sign regulations in the Zoning Code, and amending Ordinances
1709 and 2152, as amended, and Chapter 14.36 and Title 17 of the Port
Angeles Municipal Code.
Councilman Braun moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title, incorporating
the two suggested changes and citing Findings 1 - 8 and Conclusions 1 - 5, as set
forth in Exhibit "A" which is attached to and becomes a part of these rain,utes.
Counqilman Iteadrick seconde, d the motion, which carried ~.
Port of Port Angeles - 2. ~ Port df Port Angeles: POPA STV 02-04 - Clarification of ~°rior Street
Clarification of Prior Vacation:
Street Vacation
Ordinance No. 3127 Director Collins explained the purpose of this amending Ordinance was to clarify the
Resolution No. 15-02 intent of earlier street vacation ordinances in vacating properties located between
Valley Street and the Inner Harbor Line north of Marine Drive. The amending
Ordinance would require that additional compensation be paid by the Port. Because
a Resolution was previously passed setting a public hearing to vacate the property in
question and because the amending Ordinance was chosen as the best course of action,
Council is also being asked to rescind Resolution No. 14-02.
Councilman Williams indicated the Real Estate Committee concurs with the
recommendation. Mayor Wiggins read the Resolution by title, entitled
RESOLUTION NO. 15-02
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
rescinding Resolution 14-02, which had set a public hearing to consider a
street vacation petition for a portion of Tumwater Street south of the north
margin of First Street.
Councilmember Erickson moved to pass the Resolution as read by title.
Councilman Williams seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
-8-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING 4795
November 5, 2002
Port of Port Angeles - Mayor Wiggins read the Ordinance by title, entitled
Clarification of Prior
Street Vacation ORDINANCE NO. 3127
Ordinance No. 3127
Resolution No. 15-02 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, correcting an
inadvertent omission in a street vacation ordinance by clarifying that the
"one block length of Tumwater Street lying north of Marine Drive"
included the intersection of Tumwater and First Streets and by amending
the compensation amount accordingly and amending Ordinance 2395.
Councilmember Erickson moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Braun and carried unanimously.
RESOLUTIONS: None.
OTHER 1. Creelman Appeal- CUP 02-10:
CONSIDERATIONS:
Councilmembers Braun, Williams, and Rogers departed the meeting at 10:00 p.m. due
Creelman Appeal - CUP to an appearance of fairness on this agenda item. Attorney Knutson explained that the
02-10 reason the Councilmembers had to disqualify themselves is pursuant to the Appearance
of Fairness Doctrine. In one case, there were discussions between a Councilmember
and one of the parties interested in the appeal. At the time of the discussions, the
Councilmember was unaware there was an appeal pending. The other two
Councilmembers are involved in the real estate business, and there is a recent sale that
could be affected by the outcome of this appeal. In the interest of fairness and to
legally protect the decision made by the Council, the appeal should be conducted
without the participation of those three Councilmembers.
Attorney Knutson pointed out this is an appeal on the record before the Planning
Commission, which means that comments made to the Council by the appellant, Mrs.
Vi Creelman, and by the Planning Department will be based on the evidence that has
already been presented to the Planning Commission. He stated there wouldn't be any
additional witnesses or additional testimony.
Vi Creelman, 1219 Columbia Street, advised the Council she was appealing the
decision to allow a daycare center at the corner of Liberty and Columbia Streets, based
largely on safety of the children and residents. The daycare center is located at the top
of a 60-foot bluff, which Mrs. Creelman felt is no place for a daycare center. She
indicated there are several elderly people who reside in the area and who walk the
vicinity with their caregivers. The area is hazardous for lack of stop signs and
excessive traffic speeds, and the daycare center will only add to the traffic congestion.
She felt police reports would confirm there are a lot of traffic accidents in the area.
Mrs. Creelman related that her main concern is for the children, and the daycare center
should not be on the bluff. Mrs. Creelman indicated she was unable to attend the
hearing, and most of the people who live in the area are elderly and cannot go out at
night in order to attend these hearings. She came out in order to represent those
neighbors by appealing the daycare center on a 60-foot bluff; there are other properties
in the area that would be a better location for such a center.
Community Development Director Collins indicated that, in the process, the
department had included a new site plan on Page 120, which heasked the Council to
disregard. Similarly, on Page 101, he asked the Council to not consider Findings 15 -
18 which are related to work that has been done by the applicant in regard to the
conditions for approval. Due to the closed nature of the appeal, Director Collins
indicated staff would limit the review to simply what the Planning Commission
reviewed at the time its decision was made. In a document just distributed to the
Council, Director Collins indicated there are 7 conditions, 14 findings, and 7
conclusions that were part of the Planning Commission decision. There were 2 new
-9-
Till
4796 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
November 5, 2002
OTHER appeal process findings and 1 additional conclusion as revised by staff. He indicated
CONSIDERATIONS: it is in the intent of a Conditional Use Permit to allow uses, such as daycares, in
(Cont'd) residential areas as long as there are conditions that address any concerns that may
arise.
Creelman Appeal - CUP
02-10 (Cont'd) Associate Planner Johns described his review of the original site plan submitted for the
daycare center and his conversations withMrs. Creelman regarding her concern with
traffic. He concluded the site plan could be conditioned to make the access more
efficient and to reduce some of the traffic impacts. He asked for a condition of a one-
way drive-through type of parking lot so that, instead of parking on the street and
driving through the neighborhood, clients would be able to enter and exit the parking
lot without a lot of backing. He felt this would also provide better assurances of safety
to the other clients and children. Mr. Johns responded to an inquiry from the Mayor
regarding the site plan and parking plan, and he then addressed Mrs. Creelman's
concern with inadequate off-streetparking. Mr. Johns conditioned the CUP to meet the
parking requirements as listed in Code. Brief discussion followed concerning the
number and location of parking spaces being planned for the project, and the applicant
has revised the site plan as recommended by staff.
Mrs. Creelman was also concerned with the Ennis Street opening, which is an issue
about which the applicant cannot be concerned and is not an issue subject to
Community Development review. This also holds true concerning Mrs. Creelman's
desire to have Ennis Street widened because of the project. Another issue raised was
the lack of sidewalks, and Mr. Johns said there are areas with and without sidewalks
in the vicinity. Neither of the streets adjacent to the property are arterials, nor are they
school walking routes, so Mr. Johns did not require a condition to include sidewalks.
It is anticipated that most of the children will be arriving by vehicle and not walking.
The matter of children's safety was addressed with a condition to include a fence to
separate the children's play area from the steep bluff, from the parking areas, and from
the driveways and streets. In addition, the State Department of Social & Health
Services will also review the proposal before the facility will be licensed as a daycare
in accordance with the State WACs. There will be a 25-foot setback from the top of
the bluff to the areas to be used for play.
Mrs. Creelman listed conflict with the old filter plant, and Mr. Johns believed this was
in reference to the old Rayonier site which is closed and being cleaned up. In that the
future use of that site is presently unknown, it would be difficult to condition a permit
accordingly. There was a requirement, however, that the soils on the site be tested for
contaminants. In response to a question from Mayor Wiggins, Mr. Johns indicated the
soil test must be conducted prior to the time an occupancy permit can be issued.
Mr. Johns noted that Mrs. Creelman felt the facility was not needed in the area, which
is not something to be considered by Community Development. Rather, he felt market
forces would make that determination. There was testimony at the Planning
Commission, however, that there is a lack ofdaycare facilities in Port Angeles. Other
issues to be addressed were noise and traffic impacts, and efforts were made to
minimize traffic impacts by the parking requirements with the loop scenario in the
parking lot. Mr. Johns related that it is not expected that the daycare center would
generate any additional noise above that of a single family with several children.
Mrs. Creelman had indicated that the site plan showed a building that does not exist,
and the Community Development Department was uncertain how to respond to that
issue. In addition, Mrs. Creelman had asked if the City assumed any risk if DSHS
required fencing and retaining walls. Mr. Johns indicated there were conditions put in
place to provide adequate fencing and adequate safety. When the children are in the
play area, they will be supervised, and he was sure DSHS had specific guidelines
regarding a certain number of supervisors for the children. He noted the 25-foot set-
- 10-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING 4797
November 5, 2002
OTHER back between the fencing and the bluff, and he was uncertain if the City would accept
CONSIDERATIONS: any liability if there were an injury. Mr. Johns reiterated the City's opinion that the
(Cont'd) issue of the 60-foot bluff had been appropriately conditioned.
Creelman Appeal - CUP Discussion followed, and Councilman Campbell noted that one of the conditions
02-10 (Cont'd) stipulated there would be no proposed development within the 25-foot buffer. It would
appear that one of the planned play areas comes fairly close to the buffer, and Mr.
Johns responded that the specific play area would have been within the 25-foot buffer
as originally drawn on the site plan. This precipitated the condition for the 25-foot
setback, which is also required because it is an environmentally sensitive area. Mr.
Johns further described the site plan, after which Councilman Campbell inquired as to
the height of the cyclone fence. Mr. Johns responded the applicant is planning on a 5-
foot fence.
Director Collins indicated the correct procedure would be to next seek a rebuttal from
the appellant. Mrs. Creelman returned to the podium and, referencing the site plans,
indicated she had been informed by the City Attorney that the only site plan that could
be addressed this evening was the original plan. However, she indicated that Mr. Johns
had referenced other site plans, and she took exception to the discrepancy in the
procedures followedin the appealprocess. Mrs. Creelman understood that the children
would not be pre-schoolers; the older children could easily go over a 5-foot fence in
order to retrieve a ball. She reiterated that a daycare does not belong on a 60-foot
bluff, questioning the City's liability if anything does happen. Councilman Campbell
queried as to the age of the children, and Mrs. Creelman thought they would be school
age children. She felt it unfair to the elderly residents to allow this daycare, to allow
the traffic, and to allow children on a 60-foot bluff.
Director Collins identified two issues that may be troubling. One is how the fence will
protect the children from the bluff, and he felt the combination of the fence and adult
supervision to be the answer. The Council could consider the height of the fence and
whether it would be adequate. The other issue is how a daycare center is unfair to the
elderly residents, and Director Collins felt that in a conditional use, it is assumed to be
a permitted activity as long as the conditions are applied in order to allow the activity
in a permitted zone. He indicated that the safety of the children is of primary concern,
: ,.' and the City is simply making a land use decision, not becoming responsible for the
operation of the daycare center. He asked the Council to deny the appeal.
Discussion followed with questions raised regarding the soil test and the height of the
fence. Mayor Wiggins reflected on a similar situation in his neighborhood, which
resulted in a very compatible center immediately next door to his residence. The
individual Councilmembers expressed their position on the appeal, after which
Councilman Headriek moved to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning
Commission's September 11, 2002, decision citing Conditions 1 - 7, Findings 1 -
16, and Conclusions 1 - 8, as set forth in Exhibit "B" which is attached to and
becomes a part of these minutes. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Campbell. For the record, Attorney Knutson cautioned the Council that any reference
in the packet or testimony to the site plan submitted following the Planning
Commission hearing should not be considered - only the original site plan could be
referenced. A vote was taken on the motion, which carried 4 o 0. Councilmembers
Braun, Williams, and Rogers returned to the meeting.
Independent Bible Church 2. Independent Bible Church (IBC) Appeal of Determination of Significance:
Appeal of Determination of
Significance Director Collins related that the Independent Bible Church applied for a Conditional
Use Permit to expand the school and relocate their offices to the Church site at Ahlvers
Road and Laurel Street. It is proposed that the appeal be continued in order to allow
time for staff and IBC to work towards completing a limited scope Environmental
Impact Statement to allow the project to move forward with proposed mitigation.
-11-
4798 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
November 5, 2002
Therefore, Councilmember Erickson moved to continue the appeal to December
3, 2002. The motion was seconded by Councilman Campbell and carried 6 - 0,
with Councilman Williams abstaining.
Soccer Club Storage 3. Soccer Club Storage Building at Lincoln Park:
Building at Lincoln Park
Parks & Recreation Director Connelly briefly reviewed the recommendation forwarded
by the Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission to approve the construction of
a storage building at Lincoln Park. Director Connelly indicated similar buildings have
been constructed elsewhere, and this is a good example of a partnership between the
City and the youth groups. Following brief discussion on displaced parking that will
be located in another area, Councilman Braun moved to approve the Parks,
Recreation & Beautification Commission recommendation for the construction
of a new equipment storage building at Lincoln Park by the Port Angeles Youth
Soccer Club. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Rogers and carried
unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None.
QUASI-JUDICIAL:
INFORMATION: It was noted there will be a Budget Committee meeting this coming Friday at 10:30
a.m. Mayor Wiggins thanked the committee members, as well as staff, for their
diligence and hard work on the upcoming budget.
Council was reminded of the Veteran's Day Regional Site Recognition on Monday,
November 1 lth.
EXECUTIVE SESSION: None.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 p.m.
~Glenn Wiggins, Mayor B'e~'-~y ~. Up~c~C~-t3~erl~- ~' -- -~
- 12-
Exhibit "A"
4799
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF MCA 01-02B:
Findings:
Based on the information provided in the Department of Community Development Staff
Reports in support of MCA 01-02B dated December 12, 2001, January 30, 2002, February 27, 2002,
March 13, 2002, March 27, 2002, April 10, 2002, April 24, 2002, May 8, 2002, May 22, 2002, June
17, 2002, July 16, 2002, August 20, 2002, August 27, 2002, and November 5, 2002, including all
information in the public record file, comments and testimony presented during the public hearings,
the discussion and deliberation, the City of Port Angeles City Council hereby finds that:
1. Based on the deliberations and recommendations of the Citizen Code Advisory Committee,
the City of Port Angeles proposed Municipal Code Amendments to change several sections
of the Port Angeles Municipal Code, including Titles 14 Building and Construction, 16
Subdivisions, and 17 Zoning.
2. In 2001, the City Council established a Citizen Code Advisory Committee (CCAC) to review
the language in all the City's land use, environmental, and construction codes. This
committee was comprised of representatives of the building, professional, and environmental
communities and met twice a month for four months. Their recommended amendments
include suggested revisions to the Port Angeles Municipal Code, specifically Titles 14
(Building and Construction), 16 (Subdivisions), and 17 (Zoning).
3. Corrections are proposed throughout the Municipal Code which reflect changes in
department name from "Building Division" or "Planning Department" to "Department of
Community Development," and in staff titles from "Planning Director" to "Community
Development Director," and "Public Works Director to Director of Public Works and
Utilities," and "Building Inspector" to either "Building Official" or "Community
Development Director" where appropriate.
4. Per Section 17.96.100 Amendments, any amendments adopted by the City Council may be
modified from the form in which they were advertised within the limits necessary to relate
properly such amendment or amendments to the Zoning Regulations. Final action on such
modifications shall be subject to review and report of the Planning Commission prior to final
passage by the City Council.
5. The entire City Comprehensive Plan was reviewed with regards to the proposed municipal
code amendments, and the most relevant goals, policies, and objectives included, but were
not limited to, Growth Management Element Policy A(1)(a, c, d, f, g, k, and 1), Land Use
Element Goal A, Policies A. 1 and A.2, Objective A. 1, Goal B, Goal D, Policy D. 1, Goal
E, Policies E.3 and E.5-E.8, Goal F, Policies F.1 and F.2, Goal H, Transportation
Element Policies A.3 and A.6, Goal B, Policies B.1 and B.10-19, Objectives B.1-B.3,
Utilities and Public Services Element Policy A. 1, Goal C, Policies C.2-C.6, Goal D,
Policies D.1, D.6-10, Housing Element Goal A, Policies A.1 and A.5, Conservation
Element Goal A, Policies A.1-A.3, Policies B.3-B.6, B.21, Objectives B.3, Capital
Facilities Element Goal A, Policies A. 1-A.4, A.7, A.9-A. 13, Goal B, Policies B. 1-B.7,
48OO
Findings and Conclusions - MCA Ol-02B
November 5, 2002
Page 2
Objective B.1, Goal C, Policies C.1-C.5, Economic Development Element Goal A,
Policies A. 1, A.4, A.6, Goal B, Policies B. 1 and B.5.
6. A Determination of Non-Significance No. 982 was issued for the proposed municipal code
amendments on May 23, 2002.
7. The City Planning Commission conducted public hearings on March 13, April 10, May 8,
and May 22, 2002, with regard to the proposed Municipal Code Amendments and
recommended that the City Council approve certain amendments to the Municipal Code
following the May 22, 2002, public hearing.
8. The City Council conducted public heatings on June 17, July 16, and August 20, 2002, with
regard to the proposed Municipal Code Amendments. Following the City Council's August
20, 2002, Council closed the public hearing and continued deliberation of the matter.
Conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the Department of Community Development Staff
Reports in support of MCA 01-02B dated December 12, 2001, January 30, 2002, February 27, 2002,
March 13, 2002, March 27, 2002, April 10, 2002, April 24, 2002, May 8, 2002, May 22, 2002, June
17, 2002, July 16, 2002, August 20, 2002, August 27, 2002, and November 5, 2002, including all
information in the public record file, comments and testimony presented during the public hearings,
the discussion and deliberation, the City of Port Angeles City Council hereby finds that:
1. The proposed amendments are intended to refine wording, correct obvious errors, clarify
existing procedures and requirements, and help to make the code language easier to comply
with and to understand.
2. The municipal code amendments as proposed are consistent with the goals and policies of
the City's Comprehensive Plan including, but not limited to, Growth Management Element
Policy A(1)(a, c, d, f, g, k, and 1), Land Use Element Goal A, Policies A. 1 and A.2,
Objective A.1, Goal B, Goal D, Policy D.1, Goal E, Policies E.3 and E.5-E.8, Goal F,
Policies F. 1 and F.2, Goal H, Transportation Element Policies A.3 and A.6, Goal B,
Policies B.1 and B.10-19, Objectives B.1-B.3, Utilities and Public Services Element
Policy A. 1, Goal C, Policies C.2-C.6, Goal D, Policies D. 1, D.6-10, Housing Element
Goal A, Policies A. 1 and A.5, Conservation Element Goal A, Policies A. 1-A.3, Policies
B.3-B.6, B.21, Objectives B.3, Capital Facilities Element Goal A, Policies A. 1-A.4, A.7,
A.9-A. 13, Goal B, Policies B. 1-B.7, Objective B.1, Goal C, Policies C. 1-C.5, Economic
Development Element Goal A, Policies A. 1, A.4, A.6, Goal B, Policies B. 1 and B.5.
3. The amendments will result in improved public service relating to permit processing and
regulation clarification, making the Municipal Code requirements easier for the general
public to read and understand.
4. The proposed municipal code amendments help to describe the desired urban design of the
City of Port Angeles and how development regulations implement the Comprehensive Plan.
4801
Findings and Conclusions - MCA Ol-02B
November 5, 2002
Page 3
5. The proposed municipal code amendments are in the public interest.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of November 5, 2002.
-'~enn Wiggins, Mayor
B~-ck~-~.-U~n, ~ty C eriU- - -
Exhibit "B"
4802
CONDITIONS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF DENIAL OF APPEAL
OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 02-10:
Conditions:
1. The applicant shall provide a minimum of five parking spaces for employees and
two parking spaces for pick-up and drop-off. All parking shall be paved with
asphalt and striped to meet City standards.
2. The applicant must apply for and be issued a Clearing and Grading Permit prior to
the start of construction for the parking area.
3. The applicant shall provide a parking plan showing the appropriate number of
parking spaces (including handicapped parking), location of ingress and egress
from the parking area, travel patterns through the parking area, and stormwater
drainage plans meeting the requirements of the Public Works and Utilities
Department. These plans must be submitted prior to issuing a Clearing and
Grading Permit for the construction of the parking area.
4. The parking and loading area shall be designed for one-way vehicle movement
with separate ingress and egress points.
5. Play areas shall be fenced and separated from the steep slopes, driveways, and
parking areas.
6. Soils in outdoor play areas shall be tested for content of potentially harmful
materials resulting from the proximity to the Rayonier mill site.
7. No new development, either structures or paving may be any closer than 25 feet
from the top of the bluff that is located on the site. Any proposed development to
be located within the 25-foot buffer must be accompanied by a Geo-technical
Report indicating that such development will not cause the bluff to become more
unstable.
Findings:
1. The applicant Mary Lea Amundson submitted a Conditional Use Permit
application to establish a Child Day-Care Center on August 16, 2002.
2. The application is for a conditional use permit to use an existing single family
residential unit on an RS-7 Residential Single Family zoned property for a Child
Day-Care Center.
4803
Conditions, Findings, and Conclusions - CUP 02-10
November 5, 2002
Page 2
3. The site contains an environmentally sensitive area. The top of the Ennis Creek
ravine forms a steep bluffthat runs through the property on a north/south line.
PAMC 15.20.070.B.2. requires a 25-foot buffer of undisturbed vegetation to be
established at the top of marine bluffs and ravines.
4. Section 17.17.08.020 - "C"(C) of the Port Angeles Municipal Code defines a
Child day-cam center as "a child day-care center provides for the care of 13 or
mom children. The child day-care center shall not be located in a private family
residence unless the portion of the residence where the children have access is
used exclusively for the children during the hours the center is in operation or is
separated from the ususal living quarters of the family."
5. The subject property is located in the 500 block of North Liberty Street between
Water and Columbia Streets. The property is legally described as Lots 10 to 19
inclusive in Block 2 of Cain's Addition of Suburban Lot 36, together with vacated
alley and Lots 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and is approximately 52,640 square feet in size.
6. The subject property contains an existing, one-story single family residence that
has approximately 1,338 square feet of floor area and an existing two-car garage
that has a footprint of approximately 440 square feet. In total, the lot coverage is
1,778 square feet, or 7% and well below the maximum of 30%.
7. PAMC 14.30.030(E) requires 1 parking space per employee and two parking
spaces for pick-up and drop-off of children for child day-care center serving more
than 12 children. The applicant indicated that them would be 5 employees at the
day-care center.
8. The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Commercial (C). Adjacent
designations include Commercial to the west and south, Open Space (OS) to the
east and Industrial (I) and Medium Density Residential (MDR) to the north.
9. The property is zoned RS7 and Public Buildings and Parks. Properties to the west
and south are also RS-7. To the north is zoned Industrial Light at the top of the
bluff and Industrial Heavy below the bluff. The area adjacent to the north and east
is zoned PBP Public Buildings and Parks, and is the Ennis Creek ravine and
marine bluff.
10. The City's Parking Ordinance requires parking spaces to be a minimum of 8.5 by
18 feet in length and that one off-street parking space be provided for each
employee of a child day-care center and two parking spaces be provided for
unloading under PAMC 14.40.
11. The site is located in an area designated Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan
4804
Conditions, Findings, and Conclusions - CUP 02-10
November 5, 2002
Page 3
Land Use map and is in the Eastern planning area. The Comprehensive Plan's
Land Use Element Policies C1 and D1 are the most relevant to the application.
12. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for this proposed action on
September 5, 2002.
13. The Public Works and Utilities Department commented, "1) The proposed parking
lot is to be asphalt paved with storm drainage detention, parking lot catch basin
with oil separator "T". Discharge drainage to storm drain at Columbia and Liberty
Streets. No discharge over the hill side. 2) Submittal of a parking plan layout will
be required. Show required number of parking stalls, including handicap. Design
to City standards. 3) East/West alley is not vacated as shown on sketch. The
North/South alley adjacent to Lots 14-18 is vacated per Ord. 607."
14. Three written comments were received on the proposal prior to the completion of
this staff report. September 10, 2002 is the end of the public comment period
provided for in the legal notice.
15. A letter from Vi Creelman appealing the Planning Commission's decision was
received on September 25, 2002.
16. The hearing for the appeal was duly noticed on October 4, 2002, pursuant to
PAMC 17.96.140.
Conclusions:
1. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive
Plan's Commercial Land Use Designation, the Comprehensive Plan's Land Use
Element Policies C1 and D1.
2. The Comprehensive Plan allows for subordinate and compatible uses within
different zones, including residential zones. It also specifies that Child Day-Care
Centers should be allowed in certain zones by conditional use.
3. The proposed use, a Child Day-Care Center, is consistent with the purpose of RS-
7 zone, as it is compatible with adjacent residential uses, in that family child care
needs will be served. If the proposed use complies with certain definitions and the
design and performance standards set forth by the Zoning Code, then it can be
deemed consistent with the Zoning Code.
4. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the definition of Child Day-Care
Center under PAMC 17.08.020(C) and the purpose of the RS-7 zone.
4805
Conditions, Findings, and Conclusions - CUP 02-10
November 5, 2002
Page 4
5. AS conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the requirements for approval of a
conditional use permit as specified in PAMC 17.96.050.
6. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Parking Ordinance, PAMC
14.40.
7. As conditioned, the proposal is in the public use and interest.
8. The Port Angeles City Council considered an appeal of the Conditional Use
Permit CUP 02-10 approval on November 5, 2002, and upheld the conditional use
approval, denying the appeal.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of November 5, 2002.
Glenn Wiggins, Mayor
Becky J. UptQ n, Clerk