HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 12/04/1990 1753
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
December 4, 1990
I CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Sargent called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to
order at 7:02 P.M.
II PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by members of the Mini-Ha-Ha
Campfire Adventure Group. Members present were introduced by Councilman
Cornell: Shannon McWatters, Vanessa Ball, Carrie Dalton, Savabeth Anderson,
Katie Gruver, Beth Cornell, Brieanne Richardson.
III ROLL CALL
Members Present: Mayor Sargent, Councilmen Cornell, Hallett, Lemon,
Nicholson, Ostrowski, Wight.
Members Absent: None.
Staff Present: Manager Pomeranz, AttorneyKnutson, Clerk Upton, S. Brodhun,
B. Collins, L. Glenn, B. Myers, K. Godbey, J. Pittis, B.
Titus, K. Ridout, B. Coons.
Public Present: J. Dochow, K. Noonan, S. DelaBarre, S. Walker, L. Beil, L.
& B. Gregory, C. & A. Alexander, J. Grant, S. Zenovic, R.
Wheeler, R. & M. Ruud, C. Cewinder, B. Gormley, J. Ulsky,
E. Petersen, J. Pope, M. Holden, K. Dill, V. Frizzell.
IV APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20~ 1990, AND SPECIAL MEETING
OF NOVEMBER 27, 1990
Councilman Ostrowski moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of
November 20, 1990, and the special meeting of November 27, 1990, as presented.
Councilman Hallett seconded the motion.
Councilman Wight requested that the November 27, 1990, minutes reflect that
Councilman Ostrowski served as Chairman Pro Tem in the absence of Mayor Sargent
and Deputy Mayor Hallett.
The motion approving the minutes as corrected was voted on and carried with
Councilman Lemon abstaining on the vote for both sets of minutes, and Mayor
Sargent abstaining from voting on the minutes of November 27th, due to absences.
V FINANCE
1o Consideration of final payment and acceptance of work on DelGuzzi Driva
LID of $335.76 and retainage of $14.05 to escrow
Councilman Hallett moved to approve and accept the work performed and to
authorize the final payment of $335.76 to Lakeside Industries and $14.05 to
retainage and release the retainage upon receipt of releases from the Department
of Labor & Industries and the Department of Revenue. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Cornell.
Councilman Cornell asked for clarification as to the discrepancy between the
original and the present contract amounts. Public Works Director Pittis
explained the party paying the bill for the LID had submitted requests for
various change orders, resulting in the difference.
Councilman Ostrowski asked, for the benefit of the audience, that an explanation
of the LID process be submitted.
Director Pittis explained financing is obtained for LIDs through a short-term
note process, with interest being charged against the project. An assessment
roll for the LID is then presented to Council, after which time the property
-1-
1754
CITY COUNCILMEETING
December 4, 1990
owners are assessed and given notice as to required payments and a lien is then
placed on the property. Ail costs incurred during the LID process are charged
against the project. Director Pittis indicated the property owner may take a
period of ten to fifteen years to pay the LID in total.
After limited discussion, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried
unanimously.
2. Request for progress payment to DelHur for Landfill construction of
$361,480.60 and retainage of $17,581.75 to escrow
A motion was made by Councilman Hallett to authorize the progress payment to
DelHur Industries for Landfill construction in the amount of $361,480.60 with
retainage to escrow of $17,581.75. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lemon.
Mayor Sargent asked for a status report as to whether the Landfill construction
is nearing completion. Public Works Director Pittis indicated the project is
nearing 80% completion; the old cell is now closed and the new tipping area is
being used. The new scale building is being used and it is anticipated the
project area will be cleaned up in the near future and work will be finalized
on the buildings and ponds. Some of the landscaping over the old cell must wait
until springtime for completion. There is additional signage to be completed
and a notice will be placed in the newspaper announcing the time the Landfill
is again able to take recyclables.
A vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
VI CONSENT AGENDA
Councilman Ostrowski moved to accept the items as presented on the Consent
Agenda, including: (1) Request for payment to Riddell, Williams of $1,279.97
for legal representation on WPPSS issues; (2) Request for Council approval of
application to Mortgage Revenue Bond Program; (3) Request for authorization to
sell surplus vehicles; (4) Correspondence from Washington State Liquor Control
Board; (5) Vouchers of $2,655,894.04; and (6) Payroll of 11/25/90 of
$270,371.18. The motion was seconded by Councilman Hallett.
Councilman Hallett then referenced Item 2 on the Consent Agenda, pertinent to
the application to Mortgage Revenue Bond Program. In response to Councilman
Hallett's inquiries, City Manager Pomeranz indicated the purpose of the program
is to provide the City the opportunity to offer its citizens a means to purchase
homes they may not be able to purchase otherwise. A fee of $5,000 would be paid
by the City in order to obtain $1,000,000 in financing. The loans would be
granted at an interest rate of approximately 8.35%. In working with local
banks, the loans would then be sold, but would be backed by the State. The
$5,000 fee would be repaid to the City through the loan process or possibly
repaid initially by the bank the City works with on this project. This is the
first time the City has considered such an endeavor and Manager Pomeranz
indicated future consideration might be given to increasing the dollar amount.
In response to an inquiry from Councilman Cornell, Councilman Wight indicated
the program can be tailored in many fashions as desired by the City.
Additionally, Manager Pomeranz reported the City Council will have another
opportunity to consider this matter before making a final commitment.
A vote was then taken on the motion accepting the Consent Agenda items as
presented, which carried unanimously.
VII ITEMS FROM THE COUNCIL/AUDIENCE TO BE CONSIDERED/PLACED ON THE AGENDA
Mayor Sargent offered a proclamation for consideration as Item 10, and the
reforming of the Equipment Audit Committee as Item 11 on the agenda.
VIII LEGISLATION
1. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. APPEAL OF WHEELER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CUP-90(10)18, Rhodes Road
and Park Knoll Drive: Appeal of Conditional Use Permit to allow a
duplex in an RS-9, Residential Single-Family District
On October 10, 1990, the Planning Commission had recommended approval of a
-2-
1755
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
December 4, 1990
Conditional Use Permit to allow a duplex to be located in an RS-9, Residential
Single-Family District. The matter has since been appealed and is coming before
the City Council for consideration.
Councilman Hallett requested clarification in terms of defining a conditional
use and where the burden of proof lies. Planning Director Collins explained
the conditional use process, wherein it is initiated at the time a use not
principally (outright) permitted in a given zone is proposed. Such requests
need to be considered on a case-by-case basis as there is an assumption that
some uses may be permitted with certain specified conditions. There is no
assumption that all conditional uses will be permitted; the burden of proof
rests with the applicant. The Planning Commission views a conditional use is
a privilege and not a right. Director Collins continued that it must be proven
the use will be compatible with the current uses and zone in place and must be
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Mayor Sargent opened the public hearing at 7:35 P.M.
Jane Shefler, 3717 Park Knoll Drive, addressed the Council by opposing the
approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Ms. Shefler referenced specific
portions of the Zoning Code and expressed her opinion that approval of the
duplex requested would be incompatible and hazardous, particularly due to the
substandard street. Additionally, she informed Council the lot in question is
low and maintains a high water table; the area should be allowed to continue
its natural drainage. Ms. Shefler presented Council with short plat maps and
photographs of the area to further explain her references to poor drainage.
Ms. Shefler also addressed the matter of the undesired density increase that
would accompany a duplex. She urged Council to deny the conditional use.
Councilman Nicholson addressed Ms. Shefler and inquired as to the difference
between a duplex of given square-footage and a single-family residence of
identical square-footage that is not subject to the same type of approval. How
would drainage be any different? Ms. Shefler felt the density is a key factor
in terms of increased traffic, additional parking requirements, and the like.
Mayor Sargent indicated she had visited the site which appeared to have no
standing water at the time.
Steve Zenovic, 111 East Third Street, spoke on behalf of the applicant by
indicating there is a substantial drainage problem in the vicinity, but the
lot is at a higher table. The area had not been previously developed due to
lack of sewer, a matter which has since been resolved. In respect to drainage,
the City has set forth a requirement of a drainage plan subject to the approval
of the Public Works Department. The proposed duplex would not exacerbate the
area drainage, and Mr. Zenovic felt the remaining issue to be resolved is
whether the proposed duplex is a compatible use. Mr. Zenovic further explained
that traffic should not be increased significantly with the addition of the
duplex.
Jack Stewart, 333 Rhodes Road, directed a question to Mr. Zenovic as to where
the drainage water will go if this duplex is constructed. Mr. Zenovic responded
the drainage problem will be resolved, based on the required drainage plan.
Councilmembers briefly discussed what drainage requirements would be instituted
for a single-family dwelling. Public Works Director Pittis responded an
applicant for a single-family residence would have to provide drainage in a
workmanlike manner, and would not be subject to the stringent requirements as
set forth via the conditional use permitting process.
Werner Quast, 3800 Park Knoll Drive, referenced a petition which had been signed
by approximately 45 individuals representing 25 properties, wherein strong
objection to the duplex has been stated. Mr. Quast submitted the argument that
all properties in the area would be subject to severe depreciation should the
conditional use be granted. It was his opinion that the City has not provided
the necessary substructure in order to alleviate the drainage problem; and
further, that Council should be committed to granting the conditional use
subject only to the approval of the property owners and not the singular wish
of a developer. He urged Council to protect the property and the property
owners with the continuation of stability and predictability of the Zoning Code.
Councilman Cornell referenced the Comprehensive Plan and inquired as to how
properties will be decreased in value. Mr. Quast replied that certainly the
potential is present for depreciation. Councilman Ostrowski related a similar
-3-
1756
CITY COUNCILMEETING
December 4, 1990
experience in his neighborhood where the property owners also opposed a similar
development and to which he was an active participant.
Cindy Witham, 3760 Hill Circle, addressed Council by agreeing with all comments
made thus far by those opposed to the project. She referenced specific areas
that are incurring severe drainage problems during this rainy season. She urged
Council to deny the Conditional Use application.
Jim Shefler, 3717 Park Knoll Drive, reported he had walked the property and
found himself standing in nine inches of water. The property in question has
a slope that contributes to the drainage problem. Further, Mr. Shefler
expressed his understanding of the Zoning Code, which is to protect property
owners. He found himself feeling very put-upon to have to protect the
neighborhood in this matter.
~Robbie Mantooth, 2238 East~indberg Road, expressed the opinion this conditional
use is not in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan and explained that future
planning should be accomplished before the protection and character of
neighborhoods can be allowed to change.
Mayor Sargent closed the public hearing at 8:30 P.M.
The Council examined the various issues presented pertinent to the Conditional
Use Permit request and Councilman Cornell indicated he was not convinced
drainage is an issue because a single-family dwelling could be built on the lot
and could pose the same potential threat as that concerning the duplex. The
duplex would be subject to the drainage plan requirements that would not be
required of a single-family dwelling. Public Works Director Pittis stated
either type of structure, single-family or duplex, would create more runoff than
the current condition. It would be helpful to have a more specific condition,
but Public Works would make every effort to assure the maintenance of drainage
ways that exist today.
Councilman Hallett felt the issue to be addressed is whether the construction
of the duplex would aggravate the drainage situation and, if not, the argument
cannot be supported, in that the duplex would be in keeping with the
Comprehensive Plan in encouraging mixed uses. In response to a question as to
whether the area would fall under the wetlands definition, Planning Director
Collins indicated there have been no studies to reveal hydric soils or
vegetation typical of wetlands. The area is functioning as a basin.
Councilman Cornell felt depreciated property value could not be considered a
valid argument; traffic would not be impacted greatly; and no matter what was
constructed, the drainage problem would be an issue. He felt it significant
that a drainage plan would be required for the duplex in the resolution of the
matter.
Councilman Cornell moved to concur with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and deny the appeal, citing the following Condition, Findings, and
Conclusions: Condition: (A) Prior to issuance of a building permit for the
proposed duplex, the applicant shall submit a drainage plan to the Department
of Public Works for review and approval. Prior to occupancy of the structure,
all improvements required by the drainage plan shall be installed by the
applicant and approved by the Department of Public Works; Findings: (1) The
property is in a Residential Single-Family Zoning District (RS-9) which allows
duplexes on 14,000 square-foot lots as a conditional use; (2) The property is
14,600 square feet in area, is located at the corner of Park Knoll Drive and
Rhodes Road, and is currently undeveloped; (3) The surrounding area is zoned
RS-9 and is currently occupied by single-f~mily dwellings and vacant land.
Areas to the east are platted, while areas to the north, south, and west are
unplatted or short-platted into larger lots; (4) The open space provided,
aesthetic design, and parking of the proposed duplex are similar to and
compatible with the single-family residences in the neighborhood; Conclusions:
(A) The proposed duplex, as conditioned, is compatible with the intent of the
RS-9 Zoning District and with the surrounding land uses; (B) The proposed duplex
is in the public use and interest and is not detrimental to the public welfare.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Wight.
Councilman Wight discussed the ideal densities set forth in the Comprehensive
Plan and concluded the proposed density for the given area would not violate
the content or intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
-4-
1757
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
December 4, 1990
Councilman Ostrowski was of the opinion that Council should support the rights
of the petitioners opposing the project and be more sensitive to the needs of
the people in the area; Council should favor the appeal.
In response to an inquiry from Councilman Hallett, Director Collins stated in
the instance of future development in the area, the City would do very little
on a case-by-case or site-by-site basis, in terms of street improvements and
the like. The more appropriate approach, in the event of larger scale
development, would be to initiate the LID process.
Lengthy discussion ensued and, upon input from City Attorney Knutson, agreement
was reached that the City should not assure there will not be additional runoff
because of this proposed duplex. A vote was then taken on the motion which
carried by a majority vote, with Councilman Ostrowski voting in opposition.
BREAK
Council recessed for a break at 9:05 P.M. and reconvened at 9:14 P.M.
B. PROPOSED 1991-92 CITY OF PORT ANGELES BIENNIAL BUDGET REVIEW: To
receive public comment
Mayor Sargent opened the public hearing at 9:15 P.M.
Carl Alexander, 1712 West Fifth Street, spoke to Council regarding the
preliminary discussion of possibly establishing the budget on an annual basis.
He discouraged the pursuit of this change as he felt there is real value in
using the off year for purposes of reviewing such matters as the Capital
Improvement Program. The biennial budget was intended to save time and Mr.
Alexander felt this is being accomplished. Further, Mr. Alexander requested
that Council consider increasing the budget for the Public Information Program.
Funds dedicated to the program have not been increased since its inception and
Mr. Alexander noted there are several issues deserving attention from the Public
Information Officer. He expressed the need to have the newsletter published
on a monthly basis and to double the time allotted for the Public Information
Officer in order to appropriately address current issues and to accomplish some
of the original goals established for the program.
Darrell Peterson, 939 Strait View Drive, spoke to Council about property he owns
located at First and Chambers Streets. During heavy rains, his property and
others in the immediate vicinity have experienced severe flooding and back-up
in the sewer system. The budget references storm drainage resolution in the
1993-94 time frame. Mr. Peterson asked that Council arrange to resolve this
problem on a more immediate basis, as it causes very serious problems for the
area businesses.
Bill Clevenger, 1220 East Fifth Street, who is an owner of Angeles Furniture,
also referenced the flooding due to poor storm drainage and indicated he would
appreciate the Council's consideration of an immediate resolution.
Council discussed a memorandum recently distributed to Councilmembers from the
Public Works Department concerning drainage problems and concerns along First
Street. The problem of drainage has existed for a number of years but has
gotten worse over the last few years. In the memorandum from Public Works
Director Pittis, the May, 1990, Stormwater Management Plan identified a long-
term solution for the storm system problem and as part of the permit for the
sewer treatment plant, it is required that an extensive program be undertaken
for removal of storm water from the sanitary sewer system. The first step in
such a program is to inventory all parts of the systems and then analyze the
data for cost-effective solutions. The projected schedule for construction of
the solutions was originally planned to occur after the year 2005. It was
Director Pittis' recommendation in the memorandum that since we have an on-
going water problem in a specific area and design and construction of a $600,000
system is beyond our current financial capacity, the following strategy to
progress to a solution in a timely manner be initiated: To inventory existing
systems in this drainage basin as the first priority; determine the type of
solutions possible from the inventory data; determine a scope of work for the
solution; and hire a firm to design the solution. The projected earliest start
of construction would be the summer of 1992, with financing resolved at the time
the estimated value of the project is known. Director Pittis acknowledged that
a potential source of financing might be the Public Works Trust Fund.
-5-
1758
CITY COUNCILMEETING
December 4, 1990
Joan Ulsky, 739 West Fourth Street, spoke"in support of the budget request as
presented by the North Olympic Peninsula Visitors and Convention Bureau. Ms.
Ulsky indicated a majority of the members of the Port Angeles business community
benefit by the support given to the VCB. She reaffirmed that the Board is
committed to actively focusing its long-range plan on attracting visitors to
this area. Funding cuts in the past have resulted in the curtailment of certain
services to Port Angeles businesses which are of extreme importance to the
community. She asked that Council support this effort by granting funding in
the full amount of the request.
Sharon DelaBarre, 136 Matriotti Lane, Sequim, addressed the Council as a board
member of the Visitors and Convention Bureau. Ms. DelaBarre is a professional
meeting planner and felt it important to impress upon Port Angeles how vital
it is that meeting planners have one source available to contact in order to
find out the available resources in the community in terms of facilities,
transportation, and the like, to fulfill all of the requirements of planning
successful meetings and conventions. She urged CouncilWs return to full funding
for the Visitors and Convention Bureau.
Jackson Smart, 219 North Oak Street, addressed Council concerning the mural
project, which is a joint effort with the Port Angeles Downtown Association and
the Visitors and Convention Bureau. He explained the nature of the project and
the distribution plan for a promotional brochure for the mural project. Mr.
Smart urged CouncilWs full funding of the VCB's request.
The public hearing was closed at 9:48 P.M.
Discussion followed, with Councilmembers addressing the need for an additional
work session on the 1991-92 budget. Accordingly, a special work session will
be held on Tuesday, December 11, 1990, at 6:00 P.M. It was requested that an
agenda for the meeting be prepared and Mayor Sargent asked that one of the
agenda items be a reconsideration of the allocation of Hotel/Motel tax funds.
Additionally, it was requested that the unfunded Capital Improvement Program
be a matter of discussion. To be added to the agenda is the subject of the
Public Information Program, as referenced by Mr. Alexander during the public
hearing. Any additional items should be submitted to the City Manager.
2. Planning Commission minutes of November 28, 1990
A motion was made by Councilman Cornell and seconded by Councilman Hallett to
accept and place on file the Planning Commission minutes of November 28, 1990.
The motion was voted on and carried unanimously.
3. Setting a public hearing date for consideration of an appeal of an
extension of Conditional Use Permit - CUP-88(09)19 HO - Williams: Beauty
shop in the RS-7, Residential Single-Family District
Planning Director Collins reported the applicant had submitted a letter to the
Planning Department asking the matter be postponed beyond the December 18th
meeting. Accordingly, this matter will be placed on the agenda of December 18,
1990, for the purpose of setting a public hearing date.
A motion was made by Councilman Hallett and seconded by Councilman Nicholson
to complete the remainder of the agenda. A vote was taken on the motion, which
carried unanimously.
4. Consideration of becoming member of Peninsula Regional Transportation
Planning Organization
The City Council had met in joint session with the Planning Commission on
November 28, 1990, and subsequently a meeting was conducted on November 29,
1990, at which time the formation of the Peninsula Regional Transportation
Planning Organization was discussed further with representatives of Clallam
County and the Cities of Port Angeles, Forks, and Sequim. It had been the
consensus of Councilmembers present at the November 28, 1990, meeting to support
the concept of forming a regional transportation planning organization.
At this time, a question was raised by Councilman Cornell with respect to the
content and formation of the by-laws. He asked whether Council should proceed
with notice of intent to become a member without having reviewed the by-laws.
Attorney Knutson responded that action to establish intent to become a member
of the RTPO would not obligate the City to any particular form of agreement or
by-laws. The City would be eligible to receive funding for the RTPO as long
-6-
1759
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
December 4, 1990
as it establishes intent to become a member. Attorney Knutson continued that
it would be advisable to defer authorization to execute the interlocal agreement
until the form of agreement is finalized and approved by City Council.
A motion was made by Councilman Nicholson and seconded by Councilman Ostrowski
for the City of Port Angeles to express its intent to become a member agency
of the Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization and to defer
authorization to execute the interlocal agreement until the form of the
agreement is finalized.
After limited discussion, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried
unanimously.
5. Request to Council to send letter of protest concerning the Office of
Management and Budget's proposal to raise electrical rates
Mayor Sargent referenced a proposed letter to be sent to the President and the
Secretary of Energy protesting the recent Office of Management and Budget
proposal to eliminate public preference to federally produced power.
City Light Director Titus reported wholesale power rates could increase to
almost double the current levels and there is the possibility that power needed
in the region could be sold outside the region, leaving BPA and regional
utilities in search of replacement power or curtailing loads. Director Titus
thoroughly reviewed the possibilities should this proposal be adopted.
A motion was made by Councilman Nicholson and seconded by Councilman Hallett
for all Councilmembers to sign a letter to be submitted to the President and
the Secretary of Energy opposing the Office of Management and Budget proposal;
and further, that a paragraph should be added with regard to current economic/
timber issues facing the Peninsula at this time.
After brief discussion, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried
unanimously.
6. Consideration of Tennis Court Development in cooperation with the School
District
Councilman Nicholson reported on behalf of the Tennis Court ad hoc Committee
which has been meeting since this past spring, concerning the possibility of
the City and the Port Angeles School District jointly pursuing the expansion
and addition of some school facilities which are used extensively for both the
School District and a multitude of community activities. More specifically,
discussions have related to upgrading parking lots and tennis courts at the High
School. Over a period of months, several meetings have been held in an effort
to determine actual costs involved in such a project. Councilman Nicholson
referenced past cooperative efforts between the City and the School District,
many of which date back prior to 1980. Cost estimates at the present time
reveal a project total of $231,992. The City's share of participation would
involve $12,500 cash; $44,000 in lighting for the tennis courts, which would
be repaid to City Light via the General Fund over a period of seven years; and
$38,996 of in-kind labor, which would involve assistance from the Public Works
Department. Revenue totals of $386,992, representing City and School funds,
could be used toward this project, with surplus resources to be applied to local
tennis court renovation projects. In the ensuing discussion, it was noted the
cost figures are much higher than anticipated, particularly due to the cost of
lighting. It was the feeling of the Committee members the tennis courts must
be lighted in order to truly provide a community facility.
Councilman Hallett inquired as to whether anyone else is participating in this
effort, such as the County. The response was negative; that this effort at this
point strictly involves the School District and the City, in spite of the fact
many County residents would enjoy this facility.
Councilman Nicholson indicated the Parks and Recreation Department would be
charged with the responsibility of scheduling the tennis courts; the School
District would be held responsible for maintenance.
Councilman Ostrowski inquired as to whether the School District had considered
this matter.
School Superintendent John Pope said a levy is being collected at the present
time with funds specified for this particular project. It would need to be
-7-
1760
December 4, 1990
accomplished within the next two years. The parking lot project is also part
of the figure submitted for the total project cost, as the parking lot is used
for the auditorium which is used for many community activities. Further, the
parking lot is in close proximity to the tennis courts and would be utilized
in that respect, as well.
Mayor Sargent relayed the fact that some of the Councilmembers were under the
impression that such a project would cost approximately $20,000, so it is
somewhat of a surprise to receive the true scope of the project. She inquired
as to the impact on scheduling with the Public Works Department donating in-
kind labor.
Public Works Director Pittis responded the Public Works Department would be able
to work the project into its schedule without seriously jeopardizing the success
of other City projects.
Councilman Ostrowski moved to accept the recommendation regarding the
cooperative agreement between the School District and the City of Port Angeles
on the proposed tennis courts and parking lot improvements, with the financial
obligations for the City being $12,500 cash; $44,000 in lighting for the tennis
courts to be repaid to City Light via the General Fund over a period of seven
years; and $38,996 of in-kind labor to involve assistance from the Public Works
Department. The motion was seconded by Councilman Hallett.
Superintendent Pope addressed certain concerns as set forth by Councilman Lemon,
specifically relating to the timing of disbursement of City funds and the
possible need for a maintenance contract. Further, Councilman Lemon inquired
as to other possible utilization for that property should the School deem it
necessary to expand its facilities. He inquired as to the possibility of the
formulation of an agreement that the School District would not use this property
for any other purposes.
Craig Miller, President of the School District, responded that no such language
has been implemented in previous cooperative agreements, and he felt it
unnecessary at this time.
It was reported the tennis courts can conceivably be used for competitive
tournaments, which should make the project even more successful.
Councilman Cornell expressed his reservations because of an unfunded Capital
Improvement Program, as well as the fact that many County residents will be
using the facility without sharing in the cost.
Lengthy discussion followed with regard to the City's level of commitment
previously made, and Councilman Lemon subsequently echoed the concerns of
Councilman Cornell.
After limited discussion, the motion was voted on and carried by a majority
vote, with Councilman Lemon voting in opposition.
7. Discussion and suggestion concerning scheduling of Executive Sessions
Councilman Lemon had requested this matter be placed on the agenda for
discussion, and he expressed his concern that Council reconvenes for executive
session so late in the evening that it is difficult to give proper attention
to various serious matters at such a late hour. He made a motion to conduct
- executive sessions at 6:00 P.M., before the City Council regular meeting is
convened at 7:00. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nicholson.
Discussion followed concerning requirements of the City Clerk to submit notice
on special meetings 24 hours in advance. Council was of the opinion the
executive sessions should be treated as special meetings and publicized
accordingly. Should it be necessary to go beyond 7:00 for the executive
session, this would be acceptable. In addition, Council could opt to continue
executive session matters until after the regular Council session.
The vote was then taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
8. Consideration of acceptance of letter of resignation from Park Board member
Barbara Carts
Council considered a letter of resignation submitted by Barbara Catts from the
Parks Board because of health reasons.
1761
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
December 4, 1990
A motion was made by Councilman Hallett and seconded by Councilman Lemon to
accept Barbara Carts~ resignation with a letter of regret and express
appreciation for her contributions; and further, that advertisement for the
vacancy should be placed in January and interviews scheduled at the second
meeting in January. The motion was voted on and carried unanimously.
9. Consideration of appointment of Councilmember to new Information Systems
Steering Committee
Manager Pomeranz indicated the committee structure of the Integrated Finance
System Steering Committee is to be streamlined somewhat and reorganized into
one permanent Information Systems Steering Committee. It is desirable to have
input from City Council, and as such, Manager Pomeranz recommended that the
three current members of the Integrated Finance System Steering Committee
continue their membership in the Information Systems Steering Committee. By
consensus, Council agreed that Councilmen Cornell, Hallett, and Wight would
continue City Council participation in automation planning by participating in
the Information Systems Steering Committee.
10. Proclamation: December 9 - 15 as Drunk and Drugged Driving Awareness Week
Mayor Sargent declared the week of December 9 - 15 as Drunk and Drugged Driving
Awareness Week by reading the following proclamation into the record:
WHEREAS, each year intoxicated drivers continue to needlessly kill
and injure citizen of Port Angeles, causing sorrow and pain to family
and friends as well as the victims: and
WHEREAS, the economic burden resulting from alcohol and other drug
related accidents severely impacts each and every citizen, resulting
in higher taxes, insurance rates, health care costs and other
expenses; and
WHEREAS, there are alternatives and actions that can be taken by
groups and individuals to prevent such tragedies; and
WHEREAS, the Clallam County DWI Task Force and other groups in the
community are working to reduce the number of deaths, injuries, and
accidents caused by intoxicated drivers; and
WHEREAS, the increased awareness and education of citizens regarding
the problem and its solution is a very desirable condition; and
WHEREAS, the holiday season is a particularly appropriate time to
focus local attention on this critical issue, because more drivers
are on the roads, more social functions are attended and more traffic
collisions occur;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Joan Sargent, Mayor of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, do hereby proclaim that the week of December 9-15, 1990,
be officially designated as DRUNK AND DRUGGED DRIVING AWARENESS WEEK
in Port Angeles. I further urge and invite fellow citizens to join
me in local activities and events in observance of the aforementioned
week and remind everyone that proper and consistent use of safety
belts and child safety seats can save lives and reduce injuries.
11. Appointment of Audit Committee
Mayor Sargent reported the need to appoint an Audit Committee for the purpose
of reviewing the list and timing of scheduled purchases for proposed rental
equipment. Councilmen Lemon, Cornell, and Ostrowski were appointed to serve
on this Committee.
Councilman Hallett requested the Committee review the list and the timing of
scheduled purchases and bring a report back as soon as possible. He noted that
in the past, a list had been submitted in February or March; the Audit
Committee reviewed this information, and then returned to Council with a
recommendation in April or May. He felt it important that the Audit Committee
review the list for the entire year as soon as possible, so prompt action can
be taken when equipment purchases are necessary.
-9-
1762
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
December 4, 1990
IX CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS/LATE ITEMS
Councilman Lemon asked for clarification with respect to previous discussion
of an ad hoc committee to discuss multi-family housing or other affordable
housing. Councilmembers offered clarification to Councilman Lemon in that it
was their intent he serve as chairman of this committee, which will be working
in concert with the Housing Advisory Subcommittee and that Councilman Lemon is
free to add individuals to the Committee membership as he so desires.
There was a request for the Real Estate Committee to conduct a meeting. The
Committee members agreed to meet Thursday, December 6, 1990, at 4:30 P.M. to
consider a lease with ITT Rayonier on Ediz Hook; to discuss whether or not the
City has interest in obtaining a leasehold interest in harbor area lands
abutting Railroad Avenue; and the matter of the utilization of old City Hall.
Mayor Sargent reported on her attendance at an emergency meeting of the
Economic Development Council on Monday, December 3, 1990, to discuss a
presentation to be made to the Governor's timber team on Wednesday in Forks,
and at 2:00 P.M. in Port Angeles at the Port office. The Mayor distributed
copies of a draft proposal for a forest products development center to be
submitted, as prepared by Dorothy Duncan, County Commissioner, and Jim
Rumpeltes, County Administrator. The Mayor requested that Council review the
proposal and be aware of what might be the last opportunity to provide input
to the means by which the timber problem will be mitigated. Limited discussion
followed, with some Councilmembers expressing the intention of attending the
meeting; however, it was noted a quorum of Council would not be present so a
public meeting notice would not need to be published.
Councilman Lemon referenced the information on the cable television rate
increase made a part of the Information Agenda. He requested a status report
regarding the consultants' accomplishments with the cable television franchise
and subsequently requested a presentation at the December 18th City Council
meeting in this regard.
Councilman Hallett referenced the report in the Information Agenda on the
overgrown lot program. He felt it appropriate the subject be placed on the
agenda for discussion for the first or second meeting in January and Councilman
Lemon added it would be helpful to review the overgrown lot/nuisance ordinance
for possible revision. Any questions in this regard should be directed to
Public Works Director Pittis.
BREAK
Mayor Sargent recessed the meeting for a break at 11:25 P.M. and reconvened the
meeting at 11:35 P.M.
X ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Sargent adjourned the meeting to executive session at approximately 11:36
P.M. to discuss matters of litigation and labor negotiations for 25 to 30
minutes.
XI RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
The Council returned to open session at approximately 12:50 A.M.
XII ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at approximately 12:55 A.M.
Clerk ~-i <~ - 1- - M
CC.193
-10-