Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Summary 03/04/1997 NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE. 90RT AGENDA PORT ANGELES CITY COUNCIL 321 EAST FIFTH STREET PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON March 4, 1997 REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER - Regular Meeting -~o_:__~ ~ .WYL. II. ROLL CALL ~_~__~ ~ IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of February 18, 1997 regular meeting V. CEREMONIAL MATTERS/PROCLAMATIONS: Certificate: Robert Philpott VI. FINANCE: VII. CONSENT: 1. Approval of conffact with R.W. Beck for Ediz Hook sewer design 2. Approval of contract with D¢lHur for repair of storm damage along Waterfront Trail 3. Agreement between Clallam County and the City of Port Angeles 4. 1997 Hotel/motel contracts 5. Approval of out-of-state travel for Planning Director 6. Payroll - February 23, 1997 - $369,008.69 7. Voucher list - February 28, 1997 - $375,654.74 VIII. ITEMS FROM THE AUDIENCE/COUNCIL/STAFF TO BE CONSIDERED OR PLACED ON A FUTURE AGENDA (~is is the qppogunity, for members of the public,to request to sp_e. ak to specific items on the agenda.) ~c'.~, ~ - V ~ IX. P0~BL~ HEARINGS: U · 1. Public hearing for resolution modifying the City 6-¥ea~ Transportatiox~ PlanAo upcL~te~,~,e Olympic Peninsula international Gateway Center ~, ~X~o ' * - r po. Downtow. b. Presentation by Bob Jones from WSDOT on the r~lations~ o~* Tra~s'pt:rrtat/on Center Project and the Washington DOT Coastal Corridor Plan 2. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - MCA 96(08)10 AMENDMENT TO SHORELINE PROCEDURES: An amendment to bring the City's shoreline management ,~! regulations into accordance with revisions in the Department of Ecology shoreline management permit and enforcement procedures and )~ith the City's consolidated permit pro~essm. ~¢ontin.ed from Feb~ry 4, 1997.~ ~.. ~/~ City Council Agenda March 4, 1997 Page 2 IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 3. CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVE WHITE'S CREEK CROSSING AND NON- MOTORIZED PROVISIONS IN THE CITY'S PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION S~RVIC~ES .AND FACILITI~.,S PLAN. ~TSFP). ,-,d~?~-,~O~ X. LEGISLATION: ~ ~L~ 1. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC HEARINGS: . ,-. -- Adoption of labor contract with L~FF Local 656 / A. ~.~,----' oQqa .~ B. Emergency ordinance regarding development permit processing 2. RESOLUTIONS NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC HEARINGS: 3.PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES/ACTION ITEMS: Plannhag Commission Minutes - February 26, 1997: SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PER2M/T - SMA 97-01 - K-PLY, 439 Marine Drive: An application to construct an 80' x 300' x 40' structure to replace an existing warehouse facility and two smaller structures hhat wi~ be demolish,ed on property wiffdn 200' of the shoreline in the Industrial Light zone. 4. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: 1. Request by Clallam Transit to enter into grant application partnershipAo updat,e traffic lights in downtown with OPTICOM signal preemption capabilities 2. Nominations for CommuniiW Memorial . ..Lr~o ~.t..U~LL~' Public H~aring,?, Public headngs are set by the City Council in order to meet legal requirements pertaining to matters such as, land use permit applications, proposed amendments to City land use regulations, zoning changes, annexations. In addition, the City Council may set a public hearing in order to receive public input prior to making decisions which impact the citizens. Certain matters may be controversial, and the City Council may choose to seek public opinion through the public hearing process. Public Hearing Procedure: All comments must be made at the podium after the speaker first gives his/her name and address so that comments and speaker identification become part of the record. The Mayor may indicate the amount of time available for each hearing. So that all persons have an opportunity to speak, the Mayor may limit the amount of time permitted each speaker. In making your presentation to the Council, the following format may be helpful: PURPOSE: What is the idea you wish to present? Begin with an "1 statement" outlining your idea, such as, "1 am here to (support/oppose)..." REASON: Why are you making this point? This is an important step so the listener does not make assumptions about your motives. EXAMPLE: Brief and relevant example to clarify and make your point concrete. SUMMARY: What condition will be changed or improved if your point is adopted? ACTION: (If appropr, ia, te, depen(g0g o~ the situation). V~0at needs to be. done and who will do it?