The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-98 RESOLUTION NO. 1-98 A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, approving the 1998-2003 Capital Facilities Plan. WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act of 1990 (GMA) requires he City to develop a Comprehensive Plan which contains land use, housing, capital facilities, tilities, public facilities, and transportation elements; and WHEREAS, the Capital Facilities Plan is the part of the Comprehensive Plan that communicates the City's capital construction projects and purchases for a six-year period as required by the GMA; and WHEREAS, on June 28, 1994, the City Council adopted a new Comprehensive Plan, which included a Capital Facilities Plan for 1994-1999, in compliance with the GMA; and WHEREAS, all City departments have submitted capital projects for consideration, and available funding has been identified and allocated to projects in accordance with department priorities for a 1998-2003 Capital Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the departments' recommendations and has conducted a public hearing on the 1998-2003 Capital Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the 1998-2003 Capital Facilities Plan will be adopted by ordinance as part of an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the GMA, which allows the Comprehensive Plan to be amended no more frequently than once every year; -1- ,.. .....~._-. -------,.---.-.. 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port geles as follows: Section 1. The 1998-2003 Capital Facilities Plan is hereby approved, subject to formal doption by ordinance as part of the capital facilities element of the 1998 amendment to the City's PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said ouncil held on the 3rd day of February, 1998. C?, q_A--t~ f~A.~~'~ I MA OR j)n~~...Liett'^ Becky 1. U n, ty Cler APPROVED AS TO FORM: tt.'(}~ Craig D. Kdutson, City Attorney R98.1 -2.,. 11 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CITY OF PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON FOR THE YEARS 1998 TO 2003 ~ ~.. L-.. 1Ir~ " '- ...... ~ GARY BRAUN Mayor ORVILLE CAMPBELL Councilman LARRY DOYLE Deputy Mayor JAMES HULETT Councilman CATHLEEN MCKEOWN Councilwoman GLENN WIGGINS Councilman LARRY WILLIAMS Councilman JEFFREY POMERANZ City Manager 11 CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ...................................................... .............. ............... ....................................................... 1 Project Prioritization Criteria ............................ ...............................................................................:... 2 Financing the CFP ................................................................................................................................ 3 Long Term Debt Obligations & Debt Capacity ................................................................................... 4 Long Term Debt Summary ............ .................................................. .................................... ... ....... ...... 5 New Sources of Funding ...................................................................................................................... 6 Master Project Lists ............................................................... ..... .......................................................... 7 Summary of Expenditures .................................................................................................................... 8 Summary of Funding Sources ................................................................... ........................... ... ...... ....... 9 GENERAL PURPOSE General Purpose Program ........... .................. ............... ................ ....................................................... 11 General Purpose Capital Outlay ............ ............................................................................................. 12 General Purpose Cash Flow .......................... ................................................. ....... ... ............... ........... 13 Funded General Purpose Projects ....................................................................................................... 15 Non-Funded General Purpose Projects ................................................................... ........................... 35 TRANSPORT A TION Transportation Program ..................................................................................................................... 47 Transportation c;apital Outlay ............................................................................................................ 48 Transportation Cash Flow .................................. ................................................................................ 49 Funded Transportation Projects ..... ............................................................ ... ........... ....... ............... .... 50 Non-Funded Transportation Projects ... ........................................................... ...... .......... ......... ....... ... 62 ENTERPRISE Enterprise Program ............................................................................................................................. 85 Enterprise Capital Outlay ................................................................................................................... 86 Enterprise Cash Flow ......................................................................................................................... 88 Funded Enterprise Projects ................................................................................................................ 90 APPENDIX Project Map 7"- ~--... ,. CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN INTRODUCTION The State of Washington, Growth Management Act of 1990 (GMA) requires that the City of Port Angeles develop a Comprehensive Plan that contains land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, public facilities, and transportation elements. The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is the document that communicates the City's plan for capital construction and purchases for a six-year period as required by the GMA. Capital projects and major purchases are identified by city departments based on Council goals & priorities and level of service standards sufficient to maintain the safety and quality of life of our citizens. Capital construction projects and major purchases are divided into three categories within the report; General Purpose, Transportation, and Enterprise. The General Purpose element contains projects dealing with police and fire safety, parks and recreation, public buildings and improvements. The Transportation element contains projects dealing with vehicle and pedestrian transportation and for the most part duplicates our Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). The Enterprise element contains projects associated with the City's utilities - Light, Water, WasteWater, Storm Water and Solid Waste. As part of the City's Comprehensive Plan the CFP, besides being a planning document, also places certain obligations on the City. First of all the CFP is required to be a fully funded plan that identifies the sources of funding for all projects and expenditures. Secondly, land use decisions that rely on future infrastructure improvements to maintain level of service standards impose an obligation on the City to complete the improvements within six years of development if the improvement has concurrency requirements. In order to ensure this the GMA requires that the project be included in the current CFP. Due to the City's constrained financial position the current plan identifies more projects than the City can finance and so the plan is divided into funded and non-funded sections. Since this is a six-year plan, future funding may become available and projects identified as non-funded can still be completed should funding become available. This is particularly important since many sources of grant funding require projects to be included in our current CFP in order to qualify for consideration. By identifying all worthy projects, both funded and non-funded, we can position ourselves to be eligible for sources of funding that would otherwise be unavailable to us. Another outgrowth of the GMA is the differing needs for planning in the Urban Growth Area (UGA). Since the City does not provide any services outside its current city limits, we have less information about potential capital facility needs in the UGA. On the other hand, the County and the PUD that do provide services within the UGA have a diminished interest is making investments in infrastructure that may not be fully recoverable should annexation occur. For this reason the CFP does not contain projects solely necessary to deal with growth in the UGA. However, the City, County and PUD are involved in ongoing studies of the needs within the UGA and the County and PUD are consulting with the City on land use decisions and infrastructure additions within the UGA and in some cases sharing costs. 1 ~ CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN PROJECT PRIORITIZA nON CRITERIA Anticipated growth and development within the City is projected against existing facilities and infrastructure to ensure that established level of service standards are, and will continue to be, met. If situations are found where growth or development have, or will, degrade service levels, projects are identified to rectify the situation. In addition, the public, council members or city staff may suggest specific capital facility projects or major purchases. In all cases the suggestion is forwarded to the appropriate department for review and for costing. Since level of service standards and criteria are different for each category of project, the prioritization criteria are also different. The only consistent criteria are furtherance of City Council established goals & objectives and implementation of Comprehensive Plan policies. The specific prioritization criteria for each category are listed below and a detailed description of the prioritization criteria is provided in the appendix. Departmental area or fund as appropriate determines final project rankings, based on the prioritization criteria. General Purpose Criteria- . Legal Mandates . Health and Safety · Economic Development · Operation and MaintenanceIReliability . Project Feasibility · Distribution Effects .. Deferral . Other Impacts . Liability · GMA Compliance Transportation Criteria - . Safety . Mobility . Structural Condition . Geometrics . MultimodallIntermodal . Project Cost . Multi-Agency · Economic Development . O&M Cost Impact · Legal Mandate · Relationship to Other Projects · Relationship to Plans and Policies . Environmental Issues . Other Impacts Enterprise Criteria - · Legal or Contractual Mandate . Health and Safety . Reliability and Efficiency . Environmental Issues · Economic Development · Relationship to Other Project · Relationship to Plans and Policies . Project Costs · Number of Customers or Area Affected · Other Impacts 2 CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN FINANCING THE CFP As described earlier, the Capital Facilities Plan is limited to funded projects because development decisions can be predicated on future infrastructure improvements. If the development is allowed then the infrastructure improvement must occur unless level of service standards are reduced. For this reason the source of funding must be identified as part ofthe plan. The City has a multitude of possible funding sources including taxes, utility rates, grants, donations and reserves to name a few. The City also has the ability to issue bonds and use the proceeds to finance capital spending. However, when considering bond financing, or for that matter, any other type of financing, doing so obligates the City to a fixed payment stream to pay off the debt. Therefore, the CFP addresses financing sources from the standpoint of annual cash flow requirements. The master project list contained in the appendix lists annual funding requirements. Considering the City's current financial difficulties associated with the closure of the Rayonier Mill, it will be even more difficult than usual to justify capital expenditures. At the same time, however, the City needs to diversify its revenue base and attract new industry to our area. In order to accomplish this we will need to provide developed sites for new industry, and site development costs money. It is also difficult to anticipate where and what type of development will occur and when it will happen. For that reason we have traditionally split our CFP into funded and non-funded sections, but with the understanding that projects can move readily from funded to non-funded or vice versa as a result of the success or lack of success we have in competing for grants and loans. The City also has the ability to raise taxes. existing utility rates or, in a few limited cases, impose new taxes or create new utilities to generate additional revenue. New taxes and utilities could be unpopular with our citizens so any decision to move in that direction will not be easy. However, State and Federal mandates continue to impose added costs on city government and funding constraints in previous years have left us with aging infrastructure (roadways, bridges, utility lines) that require high maintenance and eventual replacement in the not so distant future. Since most of our current revenue sources are used to cover operating expenses or to provide for current debt payments, very few new projects can be considered without looking for new funding sources. Finally, certain capital facilities could be financed by voted bonds but there are limits to the City's total indebtedness without degrading our bond rating. The appendix contains a list of all bond-funded projects, annual debt payments, bond retirement date and the overall debt limit available to the City. Over the course of the six year focus period there are some debt obligations that will be paid off, thus freeing up funds to support new obligations, but these funds are limited and could also be used for other than capital needs. 3 CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN LONG TERM DEBT OBLIGATIONS & DEBT CAPACITY As the demand for public sector investment and infrastructure continues to grow, the issuance of debt has become an increasingly important component of state and local government capital programs. While the issuance of debt is frequently an appropriate method of financing capital projects, it also entails careful monitoring of such issuance's to ensure that an erosion of the government's credit quality does not result. The City of Port Angeles currently has an "A" rating for its general obligation debt from Moody's rating agency. The planning, development, and implementation of formal debt policies can be an important component of the City's overall capital program. Two basic forms oflong-term debt are general obligation and revenue bonds. The difference between these two types of bonds is that general obligation issues are backed by the full faith and credit (i.e. taxes) of the City. For revenue bonds, the income of a specific utility or activity is pledged for repayment. The City of Port Angeles has utilized both general obligation and revenue debt in its operations. A decision to borrow money binds the City to a stream of debt service payments that can last twenty years or more. The consistent application of carefully developed debt management policies can benefit the City in a number of areas. Foremost among these benefits are enhanced credit quality and improved access to the tax exempt and tax credit markets. Formal debt policies send a clear message to credit analysts, underwriters, and investors that the City is administering its debt program in a responsible manner. The City of Port Angeles complies with its policies relative to debt management. Under RCW 39.36.020(2), the public may vote to approve bond issues for general government in an amount not to exceed 2.5% of the assessed valuation. Within the 2.5% limit, the City Council may approve bond issues not to exceed 1.5% of the City's assessed valuation. Currently, the City's remaining debt capacity within the 2.5% limit is estimated at $17,265,199. Under RCW 39.36.030(4), the public may also ~ote to approve park facilities and utility bond issues, each of which is also limited to 2.5% ofthe City's assessed valuation. Thus a total of7.5% of the City's assessed valuation may be issued in bonds. All voted bonds require a 60% majority approval. To validate the election, the total votes cast must equal at least 40% of the total votes cast in the last general election. 4 CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN LONG-TERM DEBT SUMMARY Issue Maturity Balance Amount uaTe lLlj 11':) I 1992 GO and Refunding 2,120,000 12/1/2012 1,175,000 1978 City Pier 2,000,000 5/1/1998 165,000 - 1991 Senior Services Center 2,460,995 12/1/2011 1,990,000 1992 Fire Station 1,975,000 11/1/2012 1,665,000 1995 Library 3,600,000 11/1/2015 3,390,000 Total General Obligation Bonds 8,385,000 1992 Light Construction 2,920,000 9/1/2022 2,700,000 1993 Solid Waste 3,410,000 1/1/1998 745,000 1994 Water & Wastewater Construction 10,000,000 11/1/2024 9,575,000 1995 Light Construction 2,760,000 8/30/2025 2,690,000 Total Revenue Bonds 15,710,000 Total Local Improvement Bonds 991,000 1993 Marine Drive Reconstruction 702,000 7/112012 554,211 1993 811l and Peabody Culvert 86,400 7/1/2012 68,212 I 1994 Francis St. Stormwater Reconstruction 760,000 NIA 670,222 1994 Watermain & Sidewalk Replacements 750,000 7/1/2014 675,000 1994 Secondary Treatment Plant 2,500,000 7/1/2011 1,863,777 1995 Watermain & Sidewalk Reconstruction 240,000 7/112015 214,105 Total Public Works Trust Fund Loans 4,045,527 1993 Secondary Treatment Plant 2,741,681 6/1/2008 2,208,193 Total State Revolving Fund Loans 2,208,193 Total Long-Term Liabilities 31,339,720 5 11 CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN NEW SOURCES OF FUNDING If we choose to do so, there are a number of additional funding sources available to the City. It is particularly important to consider new sources of funding that could support projects that would otherwise have to be funded through the City's General Fund. Potential new funding sources are described below. Real Estate Excise Tax - the City can collect an additional ~ of 1 % on real estate transactions. Currently, the City is collecting approximately $90,000 annually on ~ of 1% on real estate transactions. Hotel/Motel Room Tax - The City could also impose an additional 2% to the hotel/motel room tax that could be used to support tourist related projects. Currently, the City is collecting approximately $170,000 from the existing 2% room tax so the additional 2% would bring in an additional $170,000 annually. Storm Water Utility - The City could create a new utility that could assess homeowners and businesses for properly disposing of storm water. Such a utility could generate approximately $84,000 annually for each $1/month fee. Again, all revenues would be subject to a utility tax. B & 0 Tax - The City is currently in the minority of cities in the State of Washington in that it does not impose a business and occupation (B & 0) tax. All cities are authorized to establish such a tax and doing so could generate as much as $250,000 annually. 6 ""!Ill CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN MASTER PROJECT LISTS The first project list identifies the capital costs associated with the various projects. The second project list identifies the cash flow requirements associated with the same projects. Some of the projects need to be funded by issuing general obligation or revenue bonds and the analysis shows where the money would come from to pay the debt service on these bonds. Seventy-six projects are recommended for funding over the 1998-2003 time period and two new utilities are suggested as possible sources of funding - a Street Utility and a Storm Water Utility. Funding for some projects can also come from reserves or from already issued bonds. Identified existing and new sources of funds and the amount available for new projects are shown on the individual detailed project sheets. Finally, not all projects can be funded so the projects were separated into two categories; funded (black on white) and non-funded (white on black). A detailed description of each column in each of the master project lists follows. Capital Accrual Accounting Method The first column, "PRIORITY", indicates the project priority utilizing the criteria identified earlier. The second column, "PROJECT ID", gives the projects identification number. The third column, "PROJECT TITLE", gives the title of the projects. The fourth column, "TOTAL PROJECT COST", lists the total project cost. The fifth column, "TOTAL CITY COST", gives the amount that must come from standard city revenue sources. The sixth column, "ANNUAL OPERATING COST", lists any additional annual operating expenses (or savings) that would be created if the project were to be completed. The seventh through twelfth columns, 1998-2003 "PROJECT COST", lists the total amount of expenditures by year. The thirteenth column, "CITY 1998-2003 COST", gives the total of city funds to be spent during the 1998-2003 time period. The fourteenth column, "OUTSIDE FUNDING REQUIRED"., lists whether the project requires outside funding to be completed (Y) or whether the project will be funded entirely from City funds (N). The fifteenth column, "OUTSIDE MANDATE", indicates whether the project is mandated by some outside agency (Y) or if the City Council has total discretion in completing the project (N). Cash Flow Accounting Method The first six columns are the same as in the Capital Accrual Accounting Method described above. The seventh through twelfth columns, 1998-2003 "CASH FLOW REQUIREMENT', gives the amount of city funds required to be spent in each of the years. It could be a lump sum amount taken from reserves or from standard revenue sources, or it could be debt payments associated with bonds or public works trust fund loans. The last column, "OTHER FUNDING SOURCES", provides a code to non-city sources of funding for the various projects. The code index can be found at the bottom of each page. .7 .,. ... CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES 0 0 8 ~ 8 M 00 M ,... M 8 0 0 0 M 0 8 ,... 8 8 ,... 0) ..... 8 8 ..... a) 0 N N ~ ,... 0 ,... 0) Iii ci Il'i i ~ ci a;j Il'i ri m ~ N ci ci ci ~ ci ~ M It) m a) a) It) N a) It) M 0) co N ,... It) ": 0) 0) ~ ~. ..... ~ N ,... ,... ~ fo9 ;; ~ Il'i oj fo9 ..... N ..... ~ Il'i N cO ri ~ 'fo9 ;; ~ ;; tit ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 ~ 0 0 8 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 8 8 ~ 8 8 0 0 M ci ci ci ....: ci ci ....: ....: 0 It) $ ..... ..... 0 It) co ,... 0 ~ ..... 0) ~ ~ M. ~. N ~ ~ ..... ..... ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fo9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 8 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ci Il'i Il'i ci ci ci ci Il'i 0 ,... a) It) N It) It) N ,... 0 ..... ..... M ..... M $ ..... ~ N ~ fo9 fo9 ...: fo9 N N fo9 ~ ~ ~ 0 8 ~ 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 8 0 8 8 0 ~ 8 0 8 ~ 8 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ..... ci ci ci Il'i Il'i ci Il'i ~ g Il'i ci 0 It) It) ,... a) It) ,... 0) co ,... 0 N N ~~ ~ fo9 lO N ~ M N ~ ~ ...: ~ fo9 N ~ g fo9 ;; ~ ;; 0 0 8 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ fo9 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci ci ci ci Il'i ri a;j Il'i Il'i ci Il'i ci Il'i ri 0 It) 0 It) ,... a) It) 0 0 0) 0 N ~ lO N 0 N N ~ ..... ~ ~ a) ~ a) lO. a) a) N It) N fo9 ~ N ffl N ~ ri ..... ri ~ ci ri fo9 ffl ~ ~ fo9 ~ ;; ~ 0 8 0 0 0 M 0 0 M N N 0 0 0 ~ ,... 0 8 0 0 r-- 0 ffl ,... ,... a) fo9 0 0 It) N 0 0 0 0 N 0 N ~ 0). 0 0 ~ r--. 0) ci Il'i ci ci Il'i a;j Il'i ri Il'i r-- ci o. ri M 0) 0 It) co ..... N r-- co :g ~ ~ 0 It) ~ 0) It) It) It) C!- co co ~ ..... r-- ..... ffl 0 ,... ..... fo9 ~ ~ ..... N ~ fo9 Il'i ~ ~ fo9 g ri ~ ~ fo9 ffl ..... ~ 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 It) ..... 0 0 0 co co 0 fo9 0 0 0 fo9 0 N M fo9 0 ~ It) It) 0 0 C!- o 0 0 0 It) ,... 0 N N a) ci ~ ..... Il'i ci Il'i Il'i ~ ~ Il'i i ~ 0) M 0) M It) It) a) M N N 0 ~ 0) N lO ~. M N ~ "':. r-- M M M ..... ~ fo9 N - fo9 fo9 ~ . N cO ..... ~ ..... ..... fo9 fo9 fo9 fo9 ffl fo9 ~ rn 'E rn Gl 'E E 01 Gl Gl .!: E > :E 0 E Gl C. 01 E Iii > ::i ~ E e .E C'lI 01 'E Gl C'lI Q. Qj ~ 0 C Gl U) ... E '0 l!:! 0: .2 E 0 01_ Gl C E :E c ili e- e'C ili Ci5 .2 a. Gl .2 E C'lI ~ c l!:! ::I a. Gl Q; iii ili ... rno 0 Gl a. cili Iii t:: 01 Gl o Gl 'fl 0 > ~ a:: 0 0 ... Gl .!!! C> e-- Gl 0 0- c 0: Gl !! e- .- Gl C Q. iii 0 ::I e J!:! a:: C> ilia:: C'lI 01 U) ili Gl en C'lI C'lI a:: a. a. a ad ~ c t:: Gl :s c Gl ~ ~ ~ Gl 0: Gl C'lI U) .2 'E a. ~ 8 U) a- U) 0 .= "C: -= CD Gl E -t!: Gl C> Q. .2 Gl IE e-o iii :2 W ...J Gl= l!:! c rn.c '0 ~ ~ C'lI Gl Iii c Gl Gl C'lI Iii Gl.!!! ~ '0 a Iii c 0 ... Ci5 Gla. iL: a. C> '0 ~> a. f- '0 'Ew en '0 0 C> f- l- I- W f- f- 8 CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN SUMMARY OF FUNDING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 0 8 C") C") .0 .... 0 0 0 co N 0 NO 0 C") 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 " " N C") 8 0 0 .0 " 0 00 0 .... 00 0 0 0 0 o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N .0 " 0 0 N ~ 0 m 0 " m iij c::i .0 ,..: N .... c::i ,..: c::i ri c::i c::i ri c::i ri cD ~ oj c::i g c::i c::i ,..: ~ N c::i ~ c::i ~ " " co .... .... .0 0 00 ~ ~ ~ 8 .0 " N ;:I; .0 m 0 .0 N 00 .0 (0 N o. ~ a ". q ~ ..... co ~ " ~. ~ ~ N co .0 N. ~ 00 00 " .... .... ..... .... .... .0 ri ~ ~ ~ .... ~ .0 ~ .0 N oj ~ N N cD ri ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ N a ~ ~ 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 00 0 00 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C") c::i c::i c::i c::i ,..: c::i c::i ,..: c::i ,..: ,..: 0 .0 co.... ..... ..... 0 .0 co 0 co " 0 ~ ~.... ..... a a ~ 00 .0 C") ~. N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 00 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 00 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N .0 c::i c::i .0 .0 c::i c::i c::i c::i c::i .0 0 " N ~~ .0 N .0 .0 N N " 0 ..... .... C") ....C") co..... .... ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c; c::i c::i .0 c::i c::i .0 .0 c::i .0 c::i c::i .0 .0 c::i .0 .0 " N ~ .0 .0 " m 0 o co co " 0 N ~ ~. ~ co. co. ~ ~ .0 N ~ ~ C") N ~ N ~ ~ cD .... ~ .... .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 c::i .0 .0 c::i as c::i c::i as c::i c::i as .0 .0 c::i .0 c::i .0 c::i c::i c::i .0 ri 0 N .0 " " .0 N N co 0 00 0 0 m ON VCO 0 .0 .0 co N 0 ~ ~ N ~ a co ~ ~ 00 N 00. 00 ~ 00 co. 00 " ..... ..... ..... 00 N .0 N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ri ~ ~ . ~ c::i ri ..... ..... " ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OC") C") 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 ~ " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0" " 0 0 0 0 0 " 00 0 .0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N. 0 0 0 0 0 ~ en 0 ~ ". m .0 .0 .0 .0 c::i c::i c::i .0 c::i c::i c::i c::i c::i ri C") as .0 c::i c::i ri ,..: N c::i ri M m co " ~ ~ " 0 .... N co N ~ ~ .0 " ~ 00.... 0 .0 .0 .0 ('t) 0 ~ m 00 ..... q a en N co ('t) ~ N N a ~ ~ ~ .0 " ". o. 0 " ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ .0 ..... N ~ ..... ..... cD ri ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 ..... 0 co 0 co co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ('t) 0 .0 0 .0 .0 0 O. 0 q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 " q N 0 N N 00 c::i N N ..... c::i N .0 .0 c::i c::i .0 c::i c::i .0 ~ ~ ..... c::i ~ ~ ~ en 00 M en ~ .0 " .0 .0 N ~ ('t) 0 0 ('t) N N 00 ('t) N .0 ~ m ~ ('t) .0 m a ('t) C") ~ .0 N " v. " ('t) N. ('t) ~ ('t) ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ ..... N N cD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ III Gl ~ III III III ~ :5 c III c c :; E .Q Q) .Q III .2 III ~ III "S III X III "S .!!! $ III "S III 0 C, Gl '0 ..0 C E ~ '0 ..0 C III '0 ..0 C en III ~ Z c: 'C ~ Gl III ~ c: :s III 0:: c: -C III e '0 c III C Cl oS! :;;s 0 C, Gl oS! :;;s c t5 c III III :;;s t5 c: a. c: E u. 0 " ~ III U. 0 .Q E $ $ ?;o u. 0 ~ '0 :;;s III 0 >>U 0 '13 III U III U Gl U. c: ... iij :;;s 0: ~ c: >> iij iii ~ Gl III III ?;o iij ~ c: III U. .- III .- 0:: 0:: 5 III '0 '0 (3 $ (jj a. (3 $ Qj 1:: Cl Iii (3 Gl (jj Gl :;;s o c: c: .= III c: .= 0 III ... iii III III " U. ~:;;s 0 Gl '0 III '0 '0 iij 0 '0 $ - III '0 0 ... 0:: $ $ $ ... - '0 c: .C :;;sUo co '0 X > c: Gl (jj :; c: S '0 0 .2: Gl 0. a. .- III $ 0 > Gl III 0. 0 c: III .C 0 U. :;;s c: ... U. III GlL: III III ~ III 'C U. 0 ... 0:: a.iij III :;;s III a. co c: 1:: U. III :;;s iij a. c: 0:: ~ ~ iij a. ..J .l!! :;;s U. I-- (5 ~ ~ Gl W U. (5 ~ ~ ~ III .21 (5 ~ ~ a. iij Qj '0 0- 'C ..J ... E u. III c: (jj e. .!.. @ I-- :c Gl Gl " o.Gl iij .!.. I-- :c .l!! I-- ~ Gl u; :Q I-- :c Gl ~ '0 W ..J c: $ I (5 iii III l!:! Gl I III ?;o ~ III (5 0 I iii c: ~ Gl :;;s ..0 :;;s iij c:_ & ~ ..0 :;;s iij Gl ..0 :;;s 0 iij c: " c: ii5 ii5 (3 ~ ii5 ii5 Gl en :::::l :;;s a. > (5 ~en :;;s a. (5 C en :;;s a. a. co (5 0 <.9 en I-- I-- en I-- w en I-- I-- 9 .,. CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN GENERAL PURPOSE PROGRAM The General Purpose Program element of the Capital Facility Plan comprises Police, Fire, Parks & Recreation, and General Government projects. Combined they represent 13% of the $43,720,983 Capital Facilities Plan. Funding for the various projects will come from a variety of sources. A total of $1,712,000 will come from City Funds - $1,070,000 from the General Fund; $467,000 from Inter-Fund Transfers, and $467,000 from Surplus Bond Funds. The remaining $3,968,000 will come from Outside Funds - $1,850,000 from Voted Bonds, $1,107,000 from State and Federal Grants, and $1,011,000 from PublicIPrivate Donations. E nteql'"j s e 61% P diCE 2% Fire 1% Pa-ks & Rec 4% Genera 6% ',,--- T ra1S portaion 26% PROGRAM AMOUNT General Purpose $5,680,000 Transportation $11,426,273 Enterprise $26,614,710 TOTAL CAPITAL PROGRAM $43,720,983 CAPIT AL FACILITIES PLAN 11 l'l I!! ~ i i!l i ~ ~ > ~ >- ~ , ~ <> !! 0 >- o >- ~ a ~ 0: 0 0. >- o >- S w ., l<l a 0 0: 0 0. >- o >- ~ a ~ 0: 0 0. >- ~ ~ 8 0: 0 0. >- o >- m_ !lJ 0" li1 0 0. >- CI ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 0. ;;! lf :J ~ 3 ~ ~ 0 o ~ ~ Ii; e u 8 >- ~ ~ t; o a 0 >- 0: 0 0. W ..J I-- f:: I-- U W .., o a: a. o a Q 0: 0. en >- I- a: :rl ~ ~~~ ..J III G ~ ~ ~ ~~~ III I- < ~ ~ ~ W W z a: >->-zzz >->->-zz 000 ~~ g.,; 00000 00000 00000 000 ~ 0 g N O~OO~ ~ 0 ~~~o~ gg;" g '" N N 000 ~. ~ "7 000 ~ ~ gg N ~~~~~ gg;"gg N IN N IN an ~.: en W C ~ Cl a. ::J W >- a: ~ ~ ::J... tio Will :.: oa ltJ a: en 5 ~ ~ >- W C W III ~ ..J >- s: ..J I- I- ~uu ~~~~~ ClClClClCl ..... N M .... It) CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN GENERAL PURPOSE CAPITAL OUTLAY u. :I: > Cl ::< z 0 f!! 9 fE CJ5u. !!jlll :I: o~; f ~:;; ll!oo ~~~ ::JI-- ~ffi < ~ R: 0 < U zzzzz zz>->->- ~ ~ ~g o ~ ~ 00 .. N N _ 00000 00000 00000 00000 ~~~~~ ~ggg~ N _ 00000 00'000 ~ ~ ~g o ~ ~ 00 .. N N _ ~~~~~ 12ggg~ N _ III a: o I-- U W I-- W ~ ~ :: oZU UG5 f:: z W a. W ::< oww ~~~ tifbfb ~a:a: 2~q9lil ~a:a:a:a: u.u..u.u..u.. ... IN (") .... an >- z -- >- >- Ie ~ 00 00 eo 0''0 ~o g ]~ ~g N iCo 10 o ~ ii ~~ '" N -- wen CJ Z ::;0 o~z II. U 0 z iii :::l Z ::< < ::< a. o 1j U W o U i~ _ N <;> <;> c c a. a. -;:''N 12 zzzzzzz >->->->->->-z ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~g N ~~~ g~8 - '" - M~ 0000000 o~o ~ o~o ~ o~~ gg .... N <D 0000000 00 ~oooo g N 000 8 0 0 0 g N o ~ ~ ~~ N o 000 ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~~~ ~. N"; .... N .... co ":rDN ~~~ 0;";"; "''''''' -.... '" ':rit'oi ~~oooo~ g~ g o~ooooo o ~. 0 N '" ~oo co ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ g:3 .. ~ ~ ~ g .~ ...~~ ~~~~~~~ g~gggg:3 ..... in N N ... .... ~ ~ ~ ~1818 '" N 0 <D~;! 111111111 1--1--1-- UCJCJ www aaa a: a: a: a. a. a. 000 zzz :::l::l::l u.u.u. ~~~ www z z z www Cl Cl Cl fil ~ fil < 0 015~ ~ ;;I, u. il515 15 I- ;;I, ~ ~ ~ :.: a: z (f.l(/)wwO I-I-Wzf:: ifiifi5~iii ...i ~~~~~~ ~ oa:~~~~a:en~ II.Zifil--~lEl--f:: w 1---a.Zu ~ggi~~~~ :. .I-Zl--Z~ ffiti;;l,lE;;I,~Cl l!!!!2z~zifi~ zU~~UJ~....Jii: 3 ZI--zoa: ~u.~~~:r~ _~C"')fDNU")"'" ~~~~~~~ a. a. a. a. a. a. a. __ N ("') .... r.n co ,.... " "' a: z W ~ ~ ~ o ~ g ~ ffi to) ~ ~ ~ ill ~ 5 ~ a: S2 ~ ~ .. ill ~ 0( " u W a: ~ ~ i iJS ~ 0( " u W a: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0( " u w a: ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ 0( " u w a: ;:: z a) ~ ~ ~ iJj ~ 0( " u W a: " "- '" >- ~ ~ ~ ~ ll' u o ~ ~ lii ~ G 8 >- ~ M t:; o a 0 >- a: U 0. U 3 Q a: 0. ~ ~ ~ ..rD 000 ~~ 'T 000 ~~ 'T 000 ~. ~ '7 000 ~ ~ <Ii ... oooo~ on 00000 000 ~. ~ 'T 000 88 gg '" ~~~~~ 8g;gg N N N N ""....: W -' ... ;:: ... U W .., o 0:: 0.. C/l W o ~ Ul ~ Cl ... ~ 0.. lil [:i ~ .., ~ CD >- 0:: ~ ~ ::i ~ ~ ~ CD ~::l f;: c[:Jw"'O 0:: :I: Z ffl C/l w U 0:: ~ 011 ~~<3ltlffia Cl~~5~w O(~>-WO ~o~~~ wm~t:+-u- z 0:: > u ~~~~~ ClClClClCl ~ 0: o 0: 0. _ N ('"') 'lit II) CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN 000 ooo~~ g~ ooo~~ g~ ooo~~ g~ ~~o~~ ~g g~ o 0 0 0 0 00000 8 8 0 8 ~ 1li0 00 ,... I.t1 .. N '" - 888~~ ~gggg '" - LL. $ Cl::l: ZOC/l 1!!9!E!5 u 5 LL. ... Wm:t&l .., W :::) I- oClOW ~ ~ ~ 0 l:!oo~ ii: I- 15 u ~ <I; ;:: ;:) 0:: 0.. ~ ~ ~ 0.. Z I- ~8~ GENERAL PURPOSE CASH FLOW ~~~ ~~ g~ ~ :: zu (515 Z w w::; ww uu :5 :5 0.. 0.. W w 0:: ~ ..... N M ..,. I.t) ~~~~~. ~ LL. LL. LL. LL '" ~~ '" '0'0 '0'0 '0'0 '0'0 1-__ 8 0 g '0'0 10'0 ]10 c:i co "f~ gg '" '" 1-1- w C/l <.) ~ ::::i ~ o <( Z ll.uo zen ;:) Z ::l: <I; ::l: 0.. o X U ~ ~ ~ ~E - '" o 0 00 0.. 0.. -:::r:; .... ~:6~~ ~~ ~":~ . ~ <Ii 2 .l::: - 0 . ojj ~~ .. - ,.; ~ ~ rDfIi o ~ 00 0 lit) 0 .. co i. o~ooo~o i. o CD .. ~ ~ MN :!: o~ooo~o i. O!! MN ~. .... - o ~ 0 ~ on .. o '" 0 .. co i. o co .. ~ ~ ~~ - o~ooo~o i. ~ ! ! ~;!:;i ~ 0 ... N 8 ~ g 00008 c:i '" o ~ ~ 00 '" co .. 08 '" o ~ 0 N '" o 0 0 0 0 800 "'. ;;; ~~~ g . ~ -; U1 .. - 8 0 8 8 ~ gg ... 8 8 8 8 888 ri~'c:ic:ic:i8'on co I.t')Il')CO co .- NN_.. ~ ~ 8 ggg '" '" 0 ui to- 0 '" - Ulrtlrtl ... ... ... uuu w w W .., .., .., 000 0:: ~ ~ 0.. 0.. 0.. 000 Z Z Z ;:) ;:) ;:) LL. LL. LL. ~ ~ ~ www Z Z Z www ClClCl 0-'0 w;;!w ~ LL. Oz 00 :t -' ~ ::l: ~ is LL. 0 -' 01-0( <i b I- ... o I- '" ~ Z C/l rtl W W 0 ~I-Wzi= ifi ifi 5 0 en (1):;:;(1)>5 ~ t;t5~~~8 fb w Z Z -' ;:) <I; I!E a~~~~IiUl~ g:ffiffi...~~~;:: ~~".g~~~~~ __~o::~~~~ 0.. 0:: ..: ... z ... z WUl;;!~;;!~~ ~ C/l Z LL. Z Z ::i ~~~ffiw~c: 5~m!;('ZOffi >I.L.U~~lr1i: o~~~~Ln~ " " " " " " " c.. c.. CL. CL. c.. c.. CL. .....NM...LnCC...... 13 _LL. -.~ 50.. 'B';' IV"'. > ~ Q) i~ -= Q) C/l > ~~ ....._~ 0'" ~....: '0 "'0 ~~ e-. :I _ C/l'" -0"; ~6~ m", !!al Ll;l ~g~ ~ ' c .Pq Q) . C C/lO-" ,;:)C coo..:> rD~~ j::.....N rh vi "eGo!! <~~ w <( ~ -' - Q) <(0.., , Q) E ccmi= fIi VJ , ~~~ g.~~ ~z'" ci5 '? ~o.. '.. "'- ~cIi , ~~~ :::i::> . ,m ~cca:: _w 13.:U "C: 0 , ~~re o 0 . ou~ .~ ]! .g tf) : & ,0<( "'U_ . ' IV 1:: '" :I o_u c....:-~ ~"~ ~ ~~u c'" , :I ' "' 0"'''' U - . .C .:~~ ". l: -J "':ILL. ~Et- ~ ~ ~ C/lU, ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ :; , 't:I o N ~ 0-", ~~i -0 0( 0 .Eu....J CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN FUNDED GENERAL PURPOSE PROJECTS 15 New P A Branch Library Project #: GG-45 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Public Works administered project involves ajoint City Pre-Construction: $300,000 and Olympic Library Board project to construct a new 25,000 LandlRight-of-Way: $0 sq ft Port Angeles Library on property owned by the Library Construction: $4,900,000 Board. The City will provide project management functions in Other: $0 Total: $5,200,000 conjunction with a Library Steering Committee. An agreement Estimated Project Funding between the City and the Library Board will address this work and includes $300,000 for renovation of the old library. Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $1,600,000 RatesfTaxes: $3,600,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $5,200,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $4,250,000 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding 1 Donation Library Board operating fund $1,600,000 Taxes Voted bonds $3,600,000 $5,200,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: Yes Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pinis Division: Department Priority: Justification: In 1994 the voters approved the sale of bonds to construct a library in the City to replace the current library. Consequences: IProject is funded. 16 Renovate Carnegie Library Project #: GG-02 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Public Works project involves renovating the old Pre-Construction: $50,000 Carnegie Library once the library functions have been Land/Right-of-Way: $0 removed to their new location. Construction: $1,150,000 Other: $0 Total: $1,200,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $1,200,000 Ratesrraxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,200,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $200,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Sources of Funding I Donation Voted Bond $900,000 Donation NOLS/ City Agreement $300,000 $1,200,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Department Priority: 2 Justification: The old Carnegie Library facade is in a condition that it can be restored. There is a potential that the museum could be housed in the restored facility. The museum must move from the courthouse in 1998. This timing is good for that reason. This project due to its proximity to downtown and its historical nature could help provide other activities for tourists to do when in the area. Consequences: The building could remain vacant and be a drain on city resources as other vacant buildings have become. 17 - Valley Creek Estuary Project #: GG-06 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Public Works administered project involves the P..Construction: $0 development of Estuary Park and trail enhancements on LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Port/DNR property between Marine Drive and the mouth of Construction: $241,000 Valley Creek. Other: $0 Total: $241,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $241.000 - RateslTaxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $241,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $241,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Sources of Funding I Donation Community $91,000 Grant ALEA $150.000 $241,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Tim Smith Division: Department Priority: 3 Justification: This project will help define the line between the industrial waterfront and downtown and is highly supported by many community organizations. Consequences: ILoss of a community asset and the need to refund grant monies. 18 City Server & Software Upgrades Project #: GG-08 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Information Services project involves upgrading and Pre-Construction: $0 replacing the city's network hardware and software as well as LandlRight-of-Way: $0 the SFG software applications. Construction: $0 Other: $200,000 Total: $200,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $150,000 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfTaxes: $50,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $200,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Fund Transfer Utility Rates $150,000 Taxes Property Taxes $50,000 $200,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Finance Department Contact: Kay Godbey Division: IS Department Priority: 4 Justification: Much of the network hardware will be more than a decade out of date as well much of the core application software. With the rate at which technology changes we need to modernize of hardware and software to be able to maintain quality customer service. Consequences: etwork and application software will no longer be supported and we will be on our own to fix any problems. 19 11 Citywide GIS Project #: GG-07 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Public Works and Utilities project involves the purchase Pre-Construction: $0 and implementation of GIS software for use by the Public Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Works & Utilities, Planning, Parks and Finance Departments. Construction: $0 Software would also be compatible with the County and the Other: $50,000 Total: $50,000 PUD. Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $45,000 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfTaxes: $5,000 . Unknown: $0 Total: $50,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capita//Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $40,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 1998 Operating Cost Amount: $500 Total Sources of Funding I Fund Transfer Utility Rates $45,000 Taxes Property Taxes $5,000 $50,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Bob Titus Division: Engineering Department Priority: 5 Justification: The ability to tie geographical information to normal city generated data will allow us to better manage land use and construction permitting as well as infrastructure maintenance with the reduced number of employees available to us. Consequences: Information will be harder to coordinate and permit processing and maintenance scheduling will be more manpower intensive and time consuming. 20 Apparatus Storage Building Project #: FR-08 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Fire project involves the construction of an apparatus Pre-Construction: $0 storage building to house old Engine 5 (Sparky Truck) and Land/Right-of-Way: $0 one reserve engme. Construction: $75,000 Other: $0 Total: $75,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfTaxes: $75,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $75,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Taxes Sources of Funding IGenera] Fund - reserves Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Fire Department Contact: Bruce Becker Division: Department Priority: Justification: In ] 999 the Fire Department will be receiving a third ambulance which will be for emergency use. This will give the Fire Department three needed ambulances because of the increased number of medica] calls. Because of limited space, we will have to relocate one reserve engine. Also, old Engine 5 (Sparky Truck) is currently being stored in a building at the Fairgrounds. Security is limited and pigeons are plenty. The building is unheated and the Fire Department would like to relocate this engine to the new storage building. Fire Department would propose building a metal storage building at the City Public Works Corp Yard which would house both engines keeping them dry and heated. The reserve engine would be utilized when another fire engine was taken to Equipment Services for repairs at the Corp Yard and be swapped out. Also, in case of a disaster such as a severe winter storm or an earthquake and the bridges were not crossable, this reserve engine could be manned by Fire Department personnel and utilized from the Corp Yard location as a temporary second station. The intent of the storage building is to keep reserve apparatus in ready response and secured should the by needed. Consequences: Both vehicles would be housed in an unheated, loosely secured remote site. 21 "!II Conversion of VHF radios to UHF Project #: FR-09 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Fire project involves the conversion ofVHF radios to Pre-Construction: $0 UHF. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $0 Other: $50,000 Total: $50,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfTaxes: $50,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $50,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund - reserves 1 $50,000 $50,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Fire Department Contact: Bruce Becker Division: Department Priority: 2 Justification: Currently, the Fire Department and other City agencies cannot get additional VHF channels because of Canadian restraints. Police Department and some other fire departments are on UHF radios. To ensure compatibility and obtain needed additional channels, we need to convert to UHF radios. The Fire Department currently has some UHF radios for medical transmissions to Olympic Memoril Hospital, but would need to have all other portables and mobile units switched to UHF. The county disaster plan also calls out for using UHF during a disaster. Consequences: Fire Department will lose the capabilities of communicating with other fire departments and other responding agencies. Availability of redio equipment will become harder to find. During times of heavy radio uses, i.e. storms, grass fire season, etc., the Fire Department is having difficulty keeping radio channels clear for emergency dispatching. 22 Install Opticom Detectors Project #: FR-02 Project Description Estimated Project Costs I This Fire project involves installing opticom detectors on the Pre-Construction: $0 traffic signals at: 1 st & Laurel, Front & Laurel, Front & Oak, LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Marine Drive & TRuck Route, Race & Boulevard, 8th & Construction: $0 Race, 1st & Lincoln, Front & Lincoln, 1st & Oak and Front & Other: $50,000 Total: $50,000 Oak. Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $50,000 - RatesfTaxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $50,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Grant IISTEA Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Fire Department Contact: Bruck Becker Division: Department Priority: 3 J ustijication: The opticom traffic control system allows emergency response vehicles to optically request a "green" traffic signal. The City currently has a number of strategic intersections optically controlled. These intersections are on our emergency response routes from the fire hall. As conditions continually require more services, our equipment is out of the station a great deal of the work day. Circumstances such as inspections, training, public presentations and EMS calls are among the requests for services. In the event the fire engine and medic unit are in the downtown area, we respond to calls without the aid of traffic control. Consequences: As traffic increases and call volume continues at its present rate, responding to emergency calls without traffic light control is an invite for trouble. Several items become a factor. Gridlock: Emergency vehicles responding with lights and sirens can cause traffic to react in strange ways. With the assistance of lane control we have a much better chance of maintaining passable intersections. Without lane control traffic congestion woudl be excessive causing unreasonable delays. Accidents: Without lane control, traffic accidents are much more frequent. We are also exposed to much greater liability when enering uncontrolled intersections against the lights. Response times would be excessive and unacceptable. 23 11 Replace Engine 3 Project #: FR-04 Proj~ct Description Estimated Project Costs This Fire project involves replacing Engine 3 which is a 1974 Pre-Construction: $0 vintage Kenworth fire engine. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $0 Other: $250,000 Total: $250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $10,000 RatesITaxes: $240,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $250,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Donation Trade-in existing fire truck $10,000 Taxes General Fund - reserves $240,000 $250,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Fire Department Contact: Bruce Becker Division: Department Priority: 4 Justification: The PA Fire Department has traditionally maintained three engine companies and one ladder truck. The age of the engine companies vary due to a planned rotation. The life cycle for an engine company in Port Angeles has been approximately 20 years. To maintain the longevity, we rotate our equipment from first out to second out to reserve. First out usually constitutes the first 7 years of service. Second out, the second 7 years of service and reserve the following 7 years. This usually provides us with 20+ years of dependable service. As call volume increases and the need to run multiple units due to limited manpower, our newer units are reapidly exceeding mileage of the older units. Consequences: Increased call volume creates much more use of vehicles. Newer vehicles are currently used much harder than older units. Emergency response with no warm up creates heavy engine wear. The more these units are used, the more often they experience failure and the more they cost to maintain. Safety regulations dictate all personnel responding shall be seated and belted. The 1974 unit to be replaced will only accomodate 2 people in a seated, belted position. This is a planned equipment rotation. If we fail to continue to rotate our vehicles, we will come to the point where our emergency response vehicles are worn out and undependable. 24 Replace medic 11 Project #: FR-03 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Fire project involves replacing Medic 11 which is a 1989 Pre-Construction: $0 vintage ambulance. LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Construction: $0 Other: $130,000 Total: $130,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $10,000 RatesfT axes: $120,000 - Unknown: $0 Total: $130,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $130,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Donation Trade-in old ambulance $10,000 Taxes General Fund - reserves $120,000 $130,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Fire Department Contact: Bruce Becker Division: Department Priority: 5 Justification: The PA Fire Department has traditionally maintained two medic units. The age of these units vary due to planned rotation. The life cycle for a medic unit in Port Angeles has been approximately ten years. To maintain this longevity, we rotate our equipment from first out to second out. First out usually constitutes the first five years of service. Second out the second five years of service. This usually provides us with ten years of dependable service. As call volume increases and the need to respond to multiple calls increases, this causes our newer equipment to repidly exceed mileage of the older units. Consequences: Increased call volume creates much more use of vehicles. Newer vehicles are currently used much harder than older units. Emergency response with no warm up creates heavy engine wear. The more these units are used, the more often they experience failure and the more they cost to maintain. If we fail to continue to rotate our vehicles, we will come to a point where our emergency response vehicles are worn our and undependable. 25 Radio Communications Project #: PD-Ol Project Description Estimated Project Costs This PENCOM project involves the replacement of existing Pre-Construction: $30,000 "radio communications systems" for the Police and Fire LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Departments to comply with anticipated FCC (Federal Construction: $500,000 Communications Commission) regulations regarding Other: $0 Total: $530,000 spectrum use, including ability to receive and transmit high Estimated Project Funding speed data and integrate a Regional Public Safety Communications system. Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $350,000 RatesfTaxes: $180,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $530,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $30,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Donation Contractual agencies $150,000 Grant Unknown $200,000 Taxes General Fund - reserves $180,000 $530,000 Legal Mandate: Yes Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Police Department Contact: Naomi Wu Division: Department Priority: Justification: Public safety response is critically dependent upon communications. It is speculated by most communications managers that the FCC will soon mandate a change to a 800 mH system which will require major "radio hardware" changes. The spectrum change will enable public safety communications to facilitate multiple frequencies, handle complicated high speed data transmissions and create a more effective and efficient method of operation with the more modem technology. Communications during critical incidents will be more efficient and effective. Consequences: Radio communications during critical incidents could and probably will become slower and more unreliable as radio traffic increases while using current technology. 26 Expansion Project #: PD-02 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Police project involves the construction of a 30' x 48' Pre-Construction: $30,000 expansion of Police Department building. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $200,000 Other: $0 Total: $230,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $230,000 RatesfTaxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $230,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $30,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Sources of Funding Donation IE-911 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Police Department Contact: Tom Riepe Division: Department Priority: 2 Justification: The evidence room is filled to 110% capacity and is in need of expansion. Additional space and office areas are needed for citizen volunteers and detectives. The department also needs 2 temporary secure holding cells to house suspects who are going to be processed or interviewed. Consequences: The consequences of an overcrowded evidence room is quite severe. The potential for lost, misplaced or contaminated evidence is exacerbated by the size of the existing evidence facility. An "incident" would jeopardize the public's trust in the Police Department and the Police Department's state accreditation certification. It would also create major liability issues. Citizen volunteers are being recruited and trained to assist with department programs. Without an adequate work area we risk losing this very valuable resource. The detective and community policing officers are working in cramped quarters, very unsuitable for an efficient, effective operation. 27 Volunteer Field Enhancements Project #: PK-Ol Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves construction of practice facilities Pre-Construction: $0 and seating, concession and scoring facilities, and overall LandIRight-of-Way: $0 enhancements to volunteer field. Construction: $183,000 Other: $0 Total: $183,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $121,500 - RateslTaxes: $61,500 Unknown: $0 Total: $183,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $83,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Donation Community - labor, materials, and cash $30,000 Grant WWRP - lAC grant (local parks category) $91,500 Taxes General Fund - reserves $61,500 $183,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Division: Department Priority: Justification: This facility, constructed with donations of labor. materials. and cash, has not been completed due to funding restraints. This project allows for completion of the facility to standards that users have grown to expect. lAC grant applied for and approved. Co.nsequences: IWe will lose grant funds and disappoint contributors. 28 , ~ Francis St. Trail Enhancements Project #: PK-04 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves acquisition of the property and Pre-Construction: $0 then installation/construction of fitness stations, focus point Land/Right-of-Way: $450,000 sculptures, play areas, kiosks, etc along the Waterfront Trail Construction: $94,000 from Francis street to Rayonier. Other: $0 Total: $544,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $272,000 Donations/Grants/Loans: $272,000 RatesfTaxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $544,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $544,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 1997 Operating Cost Amount: $500 Total Sources of Funding I Fund Transfer Wastewater fund $272,000 Grant WWRP - lAC grant $272,000 $544,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Division: Department Priority: 2 Justification: This project would provide a focal point along the Waterfront Trail, enhances public use of the trail and provides additional recreation opportunities for all ages, as well as aesthetic improvements. Grant applied for and aproved in 1995. Consequences: 29 "!II Centennial Trail-ITT to Lees Crk. Project #: PK-23 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves the extension of the trail from the Pre-Construction: $10,000 eastern Rayonier fence east 3800 ft to Lees Creek. Work Land/Right-of-Way: $0 involves confirmation of the right-of-way, grading, drainage, Construction: $240,000 and paving. Other: $0 Total: $250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $250,000 Ratesrraxes: $0 - Unknown: $0 Total: $250,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Grant Sources of Funding IISTEA grant program I $250,000 $250,000 Legal Mandate: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Concurrency: No Contract: No Division: Department Priority: 3 Justification: IThis project is the extension of the trail east of the Rayonier Mill to Lees Creek. Consequences: IDelay completion ofthe Waterfront Trail. 30 Waterfront Trail Through Rayonier Project #: PK-76 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves providing for the extension of the Pre-Construction: $10,000 Waterfront Trail from the west gate of Rayonier through the Land/Right-of-Way: $0 mill to the east fence of Rayonier. The work will involve an Construction: $200,000 agreement with the mill for right of use, fencing, grading, Other: $40,000 Total: $250,000 asphalt paving of the trail in some places, signage and Estimated Project Funding coordination of the design with the mill. Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $175,000 RateslTaxes: $75,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $250,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Grant ISTEA $175,000 Taxes General Fund $75,000 $250,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Division: Department Priority: 4 Justification: This section of the Waterfront Trail will allow for the next logical extension of the trail to the east and access to a very good beach on the eas side of the Rayonier Mill. This extension is essential to provide for the access to the trail to the east. Without the completion of this section, using other grant sources east of the mill will be difficult due to the lack of continuity of the trail. Grant funds through the mill would be difficult to use due to the right of way issues involved. Consequences: ot constructing this section ofthe trail in a timely way will make development of the trail to the east harder. 31 - Centennial Trail Prop Acquisition Project #: PK-22 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves the acquisition of the remaining Pre-Construction: $0 property necessary to construct the Centennial Trail. The LandlRight-of-Way: $160,000 Langley (approximately 4 acres) and Deane (.05 acres) are the Construction: $0 parcels that are the subject of this project. Other: $0 Total: $160,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $160,000 RatesfTaxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $160,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Grant Sources of Funding IALEA and ISTEA grants I $160,000 $160,000 Legal Mandate: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Concurrency: No Contract: No Division: Department Priority: 5 Justification: IThis is the Centennial Trail project adopted by the Council in 1990. Consequences: ILost opportunity of grants and/or property. 32 Pool Enhancements Project #: PK-15 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves renovating the locker rooms, Pre-Construction: $0 replacing the circulation/chlorine system, adding a hydro LandlRight-of-Way: $0 therapy area, and repairing the north wall ofthe existing pool Construction: $400,000 building. Other: $0 Total: $400,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $175,000 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 - RatesfTaxes: $225,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $400,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Fund Transfer Surplus bond proceeds from Senior Center bond issue $175,000 Taxes General Fund - property taxes $225,000 $400,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Division: Department Priority: 6 Justification: Replaces antiquated water treatment system, corrects structural problem with wall, brings locker rooms up to current standards, and generally enhances the publics ability to utilize the facility. Consequences: High maintenance costs and less attractive pool. 33 Pier Piling InsplReplacement Project #: PK-24 Proje~t Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves the inspection of the pilings with Pill-Construction: $0 ultra sound equipment to determine their condition and Land/Right-of-Way: $0 amount needing replacement. Construction: $50,000 Other: $15,000 Total: $65,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $65,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $65,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $15,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund - property taxes I $65,000 $65,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Division: Department Priority: 7 Justification: Ultra sounding the pier pilings will identify pilings that have "stove pipe" centers and require replacing. Since the pilings have only been visually inspected since the pier was constructed, both Fletcher General Construction and the Coast Guard have at various times identified interior pilings needing replacement. Ultra sounding and piling replacement will keep the pier in a safe and usuable condition. Consequences: IStructural integrity of the pier will be lost leaving it unsafe to use. 34 CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN NON-FUNDED GENERAL PURPOSE PROJECTS 35 ...,.... ----".-..- 11 Marine Lab Expansion Project #: GG-63 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Public Works administered project involves expanding Pre-Construction: $50,000 the Arthur D Feiro Marine Lab along the CND waterfront area Land/Right-of-Way: $0 to attract and service a greater audience and range of users. Construction: $10,000,000 Other: $0 Total: $10,050,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $10,050,000 RateslTaxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $10,050,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Donation Private Donations/Grants $10,000,000 Grant CERB Feabisility Grant $50,000 $10,050,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Department Priority: 6 Justification: This project follows Council goals to maintain and develop city facilities, especially in the CBD and waterfront area. This project also enhances and increases economic development in the CBD and downtown revitalization. Consequences: IContinued difficulty to diversify the economy of downtown. 36 East Side Fire Station Project #: FR-05 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Fire project involves the construction of a satellite fire Pre-Construction: $0 station on the east side of the city. Land/Right-of-Way: $150,000 Construction: $1,000,000 Other: $250,000 Total: $1,400,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $1,400,000 Ratesrraxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,400,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 1998 Operating Cost Amount: $650,000 Sources of Funding I $1,400,000 $1,400,000 Donation IV oted Bond Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Fire Department Contact: Bruce Becker Division: Department Priority: 6 Justification: 1) Faster response time to fire and EMS calls. 2) Increased traffic - potential for accidents. 3) Increasing commercial growth on the east side. 4) If one station is out of service due to natural disaster (earthquake, major storm, etc.), satellite stations may still be able to provide emergency services. Consequences: 1) With eastside annexatiol1s, response time is increasing. 2) Current response time from 5th and Laurel is 10-12 minutes.to some east side areas, far beyond the 3-4 minute goal. 3) Escalating threat to public safety and property. 4) Delayed response to mass casualty incidents and major disasters. 5) No EMS or fire response to east side if transportation routes are disrupted. 37 ,. West Side Fire Station Project #: FR-07 Project Description EstillUlted Project Costs This Fire project involves the construction of a satellite fire Pre-Construction: $0 station on the west side of the city. Land/Right-of-Way: $100,000 Construction: $1,000,000 Other: $250,000 Total: $1,350,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $1,350,000 . Ratesrraxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,350,000 Yearly Expense SumllUlry - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 1999 Operating Cost Amount: $670,000 Sources of Funding Donation IV oted Bond Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Fire Department Contact: Bruce Becker Division: Department Priority: 7 J ustijication: 1) Faster response time to fire and EMS calls. 2) Increased traffic - potential for accidents. 3) Increasing residential growth on the west side. 4) If one station is out of service due to natural disaster (earthquake, major storm, etc) satellite stations may still be able to provide emergency service. 5) Industrial park growth potential. Consequences: 1) With westside annexations, response time is increasi~g. 2) Current response time from 5th and Laurel is 1 O-}2 minutes to some west side areas, far beyond the 3-4 minute ideal. 3) Escalating threat to public safety and property. 4) Delayed response to mass casualty incidents or natural disasters. 5) !No EMS or fire response to west side if transportation routes are disrupted. 38 Construct New Parks Shop Project #: PK-03 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves construction of a maintenance Pre-Construction: $0 building to house the parks maintenance division. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $100,000 Other: $0 Total: $100,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfTaxes: $100,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $100,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 1998 Operating Cost Amount: $1,000 Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund - reserves Legal Mandate: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Concurrency: No Contract: No Division: Department Priority: 8 Justification: A larger building is needed to house the parks maintenance division personnel, supplies and small equipment. The divisions maintenance responsibilities have outgrown the present building, requiring supplies and equipment to be stored at various locations in the park system. Consequences: IInefficient use of manpower. 39 Centennial Trail-Lee's Creek to Morse Creek Project #: PK-26 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves the construction of the trail 6000 PIe-Construction: $40,000 feet from Lees Creek to Morse Creek. Work involves grading, LandlRight-of-Way: $0 drainage and paving. Construction: $300,000 Other: $0 Total: $340,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grantslloans: $170,000 RatesfTaxes: . $170,000 - Unknown: $0 Total: $340,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $40,000 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Grant ISTEA, DNR, lAC $170,000 Taxes General fund - property taxes $170,000 $340,000 Legal Mandate: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Concurrency: No Contract: No Division: Department Priority: 9 Justification: IThis would continue the trail to Morse Creek and allow greater access to the shoreline. Consequences: INo trail. 40 Civic Field Enhancements Project #: PK-77 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves installing additional seating, P,'e-Construction: $0 upgrading and expanding lighting and concrete repairs. LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Construction: $100,000 Other: $0 Total: $100,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $50,000 RatesfT axes: $50,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $100,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Grant WWRP - lAC grant $50,000 Taxes General Fund - property taxes $50,000 $100,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Division: Department Priority: 10 Justification: This project protects the value of one of the city's most utilized assets. It provides for the upgrading and enhancement of the facility by providing concrete repairs to the stadium, needed additional seating, and improved field lighting for the safety ofthe facility users. . Consequences: IContinueddeterioration of Civic Field. 41 Golf CourselRec Complex Project #: PK-62 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves the construction of an 18 hole Pre-Construction: $25,000 municipal golf course and a rec complex that would include a Land/Right-of-Way: $1,106,250 golf driving range, softball fields, etc. This project was started Construction: $3,343,750 in 1994 and awaiting a market/feasibility study to determine Other: $0 Total: $4,475,000 whether to proceed. Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $9,000,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $9,000,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $25,000 $0 $2,212,500 $2,237,500 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 1999 Operating Cost Amount: ($500,000) Sources of Funding I Taxes V oted Bond issue - property taxes $4,500,000 Taxes V oted Bond Issue - property taxes $4,500,000 $9,000,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Division: Department Priority: 11 Justification: This project provides enhanced recreation opportunities as well as economic/tourism development. This project would only happen if it were determined that it would provide the city with a net positive cash flow. Consequences: \No golf course/rec complex. 42 ", Lincoln Park Enhancements Project #: PK-02 Project Description . Estimated Project Costs I This Parks project involves renovating the campground and Pre-Construction: $0 improvements to the trail system. The project will also LandlRight-of-Way: $0 provide improvements to the pond area including adding Construction: $300,000 fishing piers, observation areas, and paving the trail and dike Other: $0 Total: $300,000 for improved handicap access. Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $225,000 - RatesfTaxes: $75,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $300,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 W W W W W W First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Donation Proceeds from the sale of timber $75,000 Grant WWRP - lAC grant $150,000 Taxes General Fund - reserves $75,000 $300,000 Legal Mandate: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Concurrency: No Contract: No Division: Department Priority: 12 Justification: Enhancements will provide facilities for public use. Improvements to the campground will provide better services to campers who visit our community. Trail and pond improvements will enhance community use and provide better accessibility to the handicapped. Consequences: ILess -attractive park. 43 11 Pier BreakwaterlWaterfront Park Project #: PK-06 Proje.ct Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves construction of a breakwater to Pre-Construction: $0 protect the City Pier and Hollywood Beach from NE storms in Land/Right-of-Way: $0 phase I. Phase 2 would see construction of beach, picnic, Construction: $5,000,000 volleyball, and grassy areas at Hollywood Beach. Other: $0 Total: $5,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $300,000 RatesfT axes: $2,500,000 Unknown: $2,200,000 Total: $5,000,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Sources of Funding I Grant WWRP - lAC grant $300,000 Taxes General Fund - property taxes $2,500,000 Unknown Unknown $2,200,000 $5,000,000 Legal Mandate: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Concurrency: No Contract: No Division: Department Priority: 13 Justification: This project allows moorage facilities to be in place year around, provides a downtown/waterfront focal point and compliments the proposed marine lab expansion. Consequences: INo breakwater. 44 ~ IcelY outh Pavilion Project #: PK-05 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves construction of an ice rink and Pre-Construction: $0 youth facility. LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Construction: $3,000,000 Other: $0 Total: $3,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfT axes: $1,500,000 - Unknown: $1,500,000 Total: $3,000,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 First Year of Operating Cost: 2003 Operating Cost Amount: $100,000 Total Sources of Funding I Taxes General Fund - property taxes $1,500,000 Unknown Unknown $1,500,000 $3,000,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Division: Department Priority: 14 Justification: This proposal is in response to continued community input, including the 1994 public hearings regarding the CFP. Consequences: !No facility. 45 Waterfront Trail-Valley Crk. Project #: PK-25 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Parks project involves the construction of a trail from Pre-Construction: $7,000 Oak to Valley: (Length 1500 ft @ 321ft, lighting 15 @ 1200 Land/Right-of-Way: $0 each, landscaping/engineering.) Construction: $78,000 Other: $0 Total: $85,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $85,000 RatesfTaxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $85,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $85,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Grant IALEA Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Parks Department Contact: Scott Brodhun Division: Department Priority: 15 Justification: IThis spur would increase access to the Centenial Trail. Consequences: INo trail in area. 46 CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN TRANSPORT A nON PROGRAM The Transportation Program element of the Capital Facility Plan comprises all vehicle and pedestrian transportation projects including roadways, bridges, alleys, sidewalks and traffic lighting/signals. Combined they represent 26% of the $43,720,983 Capital Facilities Plan. Funding for the various projects will come from a variety of sources. A total of $4,003,000 will come from City Funds - $3,043,000 from the Street Fund, $600,000 from Real Estate Excise Taxes, and $360,000 from Inter-Fund Transfers. The remaining $7,423,273 will come from Outside Funds - $6,773,273 from State and Federal Grants, and $650,000 from PubliclPrivate Donations. Vehicle Related 23% Enterprise 61% Pedestrian Related 2% ~Lighting & Signals 1% General Purpose 13% PROGRAM AMOUNT General Purpose $5,680,000 Transportation $11,426,273 Enterprise $26,614,710 TOTAL CAPITAL PROGRAM $43,720,983 CAPIT AL FACILITIES PLAN 47 - l'l ~ '" o l'l ~ o 5 I ~ .. lJ .. i a ~ a: lJ 0. .. lJ .. 2 a ~ a: lJ 0. .. lJ .. ~ a 3 a: lJ 0. .. ~ ~ ~ g: .. lJ .. ! a ~ a: lJ 0. .. lJ .. ; a :g a: lJ 0. " ;t ~ .. ~ ~ l3 ~ ~ lJ o ~ ~ Iii ~ (3 8 .. ~ ~ ~ e ~ 8 0., lJ a 9 a: 0. W -' I- i= I- U W .., o 0:: 0.. CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL OUTLAY >->->-z>->-z>->-zz >-zz>-z>->-zzz>- ~~~~~~ gglligsig ....._CCN(;S..... oooo~ g o~~~~ ~~~l - ooooo~ g ~ ~ ~ cri~(f') Ni:~ 0"':"; N 00 ~ 0 ~ lli g 0000 O~~O~ ~~ g 000 o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~g N 00 o 0 ~~~~~ llil<igg~ - II> II> N ..: ~O~~~ g lligg o 000 000 ~ ~ ~ ggg ... - ~ ~ ~ ~g ~ ~ ~ vi Il)~ vi N N lI'l ... _ M ci~ ~ ~ ~ ~~g - ~ ~ ~ llilli&ti ... N lI'l ... - 0) ~ri"': ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~g ~ ~ ~ .,;.,;!!i ~&;Ci5 C"i N 00 ~ ~ ~g ~~~ ~~~ N""':ui ~ ~ ~g ~~~ ~:3:li "":::- ~ooooooo a;j O~~ ~~ 8~~~~~0 ~gsi:3sig N_~N._ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~i~ .,.: .,.:",.;.,.: .,.: l!! () w Cl 0:: 0.. ... W w 0:: ... Ul >- o ... ::l Z ... wOO :::E I- Z Z S2~ ~~ I- 0.. 0:: W 00:: ~~gj t!):$'" wS!~ W-'I- (l)CCO) ~ ;;i W z :::E t!) Win ~Soll Z 0.. -' ....Cf.)WWW !z_o::oo::~ ~ ~ ~ x ~wwou ~~~~~ll! ~ffi8cc~~ alo..a:ffi~~ ~~~:g<3 u:::E(I)a:oo <>-:I:::l~U ~5t;:Sal~ II> ~ ... >- ~ ~ ~~~~:~~ ~.... ............ .... .... ~~~~ :;jg5ig "'.-0:= V] N N N 888 ":oroi lil:2Ol oitlSlli N ~ ~ ~~ s;:;o _ ... Ol ~~~ (1)(1)(1) ......1- UUU www aao a: a: a: 0.. 0.. 0.. ......... www www a: a: a: ......... (1)(1)", 0-'0 w~~ ~o u.. Z o ::l i~~ o 0 ~... ~ ~ ~ o ... z o i= u w (I) a: w ~~~ 088 iija:o:: <I- 0.. 0.. ~ ~ ~~~ Ii! i: E! I-U(I) ~ ~ ~ rl: rl: a: I- I- I- -NC'?tl)CCl,....ClO(J)~~ 48 '" 0: w ~ ~ l:i g !Z ~ ! ~ :I: ~ ~ ~ 0: ~ I ~ J: a: ~ ~ o W 0: !Z ~ ! ~ ~ ~ < a o l:! I- ;: z o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < a o w 0: !Z ~ ~ ~ g: i,; ~ < a o w 0: I- ~ ~ II) it ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ 0: " ~ z < i= ..... ~ ~ l3 :l ll' 0 o ~ I- ~ 1= ~ 8 u 0 .. -:i. ~ :n I- a 0 8 a: 0 Q. w -' ~ j::: ~ U W (3 a: a. Q ~ ii1 o ii1 Q. - ,.: <>[ - ooooo~ g 000 00 000 800 ri 88 rig Ul ~ u w .., o It: Q. ... W W It: ... Ul >- o ~::> z ~ wm ::!E ~ z z ~~ -'w i1ju a::5 ...a. a:w oa: .... CL a: ~~~ ~~~ w -' ... mmco 80 iii N 8 2 g~ CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN TRANSPORT A nON CASH FLOW ....~ 5! ,.: ~1Il~ ....-.... mMan ~l:l:5l C"ioiri 8 8 g~ 08 g 00 N iii ... 08 g -m lll.... ri"': NO <'>N ri \;;;:1; ... .... im 0~~88 im~g _ It) _ lllllllll !" <D IIli _ N "'. '" 00 N iii ... ~ ~ 8 8 im~g i~i g":lIli It) l>l. :::: 80820~088 ~ g~ i ~g 888 ~~g o 888 Ilicici N co '" 000 ~~~ ~lIii N(/;... 0000 N iii ... 88 ~g 0-0 ~~N ~~ri N",lll 0000 88 ~g 8le8 uio)ai ::<l:l;:li ~ooooooo IIli 088 aim 8888880 ~gsi:ligg N q N...,. .- 888888~ ~~g~~~m" ...: - 11)- - 8888 :;jgc:ig ... -.;;1; '" - N N N 888 ::;g:;f co co muill'i N ~~~ ri ..: N. 5! ~ 1ii riuiC"i - ... Ullllm ......~ 000 www .., .., .., 000 It: It: a: CLCLCL ......~ www www ~ ~ ~ lIllllm 0-'0 w-'w ~~~ 00::> ~-'''- ::!Eg~ ~...~ ~ ~ o ~ 8888 :;jgc:i~ ...-:;;1;", ~ -' >- z < ~ ~ ~ ~ c>~iii5 < z:5 oll j::: CJ za.-'U ~~ww~lll :!:<~a:za: :5a.50~~~::!E::!E ::>wWoo:!:~~ ~lIlIt:8irW_c>c> ::!E:!:zlfJirma:ooo < CJmO~lIla:a: a:WOzZ-,.,CLa. ma.irw~~;::-'''' ~~~~<-'~~!(~-' U::!ElIlirOOo_ <>-J:::>"'O::> ~5li;:5al~~~~ ~l>ll(l~ ~qCO""l:j;! ~~~e:~e:e:~~~~' _NM"I;tlO <O......COQ)~~ 49 -"- -.~ .~ CL ri':' ~ ~ ~ ~ 1)8- m ~!l III ~ . ., 5!'7 -N ON ~......- '0 "'0 ~~ e-. ,,- mN ~"ti S~;: .. '" ~11";l ~~g .2 ~ It C N 1'; ~ci.s ,::>c coCL::> ~~~ ~-N .,,;,,; ......1)J! ~=~ -,<.. <0.8 ~~~ fA rn . en ' co .e ~ "'- !ci~ ~~i ~cn , ~>>>~ ::;::> - . . m v~ffi U..:U 'C 0 I ~:e~ 00 - 8 ~ .!! ti tV 0 en = 8 .:,8~ - . tV 6~tl a. _tV I:t::::~ N ~ :5 >;.~u ~~~ O...N l;':g _:=0 .. c.-.J 8E~ ~~fi: mU, 0>'''' C<'>N :g -......:. L!~~ liilii~ =~'1:J ON!;:. 0-", -;ui~ ~~~ .ELL...J CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN FUNDED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS 50 Lauridsen Blvd/Airport Road Realignment Project #: TR-40 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves the realignment of the P,-e-Construction: $250,000 existing Lauridsen Blvd, Airport Road and Edgewood Drive Land/Right-of-Way: $600,000 area. It is a multi-agency grant project funded by the City, Construction: $1,000,000 Port, County and Transportation Board. Other: $0 Total: $1,850,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $1,600,938 - Ratesrraxes: $249,062 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,850,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $850,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Donation Port of Port Angeles $189,050 Donation Clallam County $189,050 Grant F AUS Grant from City Allocation $29,738 Grant TIB $ L193,1 00 Taxes City - General Fund $249,062 $1,850,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: Yes Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: Justification: This project is to improve the access to the airport from US I Oland improve the intersection of Edgewood Drive and Airport Road which is a high accident intersection. There are binding agreements between the agencies involved to share costs of this project. In the long term this project will improve the economic stability of the airport by improving the access to the airport. The design will address the ability to serve the future airport terminal location which will be west of the current tenninal. Consequences: Project is currently funded. If not funded the agreements with the Port, County and TIB Grant would have to be closed and all grant funds paid back. 51 8th Street Bridge Replacement Study Project #: TR-30 Proj~ct Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves the initial stages of the Pre-Construction: $150,000 replacement of both 8th Street Bridges. Once load limits and LandlRight-of-Way: $0 structural conditions reach the point of economics for Construction: $0 replacement, this study should be conducted. This effort Other: $0 Total: $150,000 should remain at the last year of our planning for projects until Estimated Project Funding a firm date is determined. Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $150,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $150,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Taxes IGeneral Fund Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 2 J ustiflcation: Replacement of the 8th Street Bridges will become a very important project when the structural rating of the bridges must be reduced and load limits placed on the bridges. These bridges provide the major east/west arterial link across town that is vital to all modes of transportation and especially emergency services. Consequences: Not conducting the stu.dy when the bridges reach the point of structural problems will eventually impact the ability to provide traffic service across town. If the structural ability of the birdges is not addresses in a timely manner, the bridges would eventually have to be closed to traffic. 52 111 ADA Curb Ramps Project #: TR-26 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves installing curb ramps at Pl-e-Construction: $0 various intersections. LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Construction: $1,000,000 Other: $0 Total: $1,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslT axes: $1,000,000 - Unknown: $0 Total: $1,000,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $375,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Sources of Funding Taxes ISteet Fund Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Department Priority: 3 Justification: IADA requires that sidewalks be usable by those confined to wheelchairs. Consequences: IViolation of ADA. 53 11 Olympic Peninsula Inti Gateway Project #: TR-48 Project Description Estimated Project Costs I This Transportation project involves designing and P(e-Construction: $750,000 constructing the selected alternative from the pre-design Land/Right-of-Way: $0 efforts. Construction: $4,900,000 Other: $0 Total: $5,650,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $5,395,000 RateslTaxes: $255,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $5,650,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $750,000 $80,000 $2,820,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 2000 Operating Cost Amount: $18,000 Sources of Funding I Donation Outside Public and Private Match for Design and Construction $450,000 Donation Private Match - Pre-Design (Chamber, Downtown & Victoria Exp $15,000 Donation Transit Match - Pre-Design $15,000 Donation Port Match - Pre-Design $15,000 Grant Coastal Corridor Design & Construction $2,250,000 Grant FTA $1,000,000 Grant USFS $60,000 Grant TIB Grant for Design/Construction $1,500,000 Grant TIB Grant for Pre-Design $90,000 Taxes City and Others Match for Design/Construction $240,000 Taxes City General Fund Match for Pre-Design $15,000 $5,650,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 4 J ustificat;on: This project is to improve and enhance the economy ofthe Downtown and the City in general. It is a match of public multi-agency and private partnerships to consolidate the transportation systems under one roof in the downtown area. The intent is to combine transit, ferry ridership, vehicles, waterfront trail users, buses, van tours, taxis and others into one coordinated transportation system using the transportation center as the hub and catalyst. Consequences: Delay in revitalizing the downtown core and its emergance from a timber dependent economy. 54 1111 8th Street Bridges Repairs Project #: TR-ll Project Description . Estimated Project Costs I This Transportation project involves repairing structural Pre-Construction: $0 elements found in the even year inspections. This work will Land/Right-of-Way: $0 occur in the odd numbered years. Construction: $400,000 Other: $0 Total: $400,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfT axes: $400,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $400,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Sources of Funding Taxes IGeneral Fund Legal Mandate: Yes Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 5 Justification: The inspection of the 8th Street Bridges every even year is required by the State Bridge Inspection Program. The repairing of the deficiencies found in the inspections is scheduled in the odd numbered years and is a logical element of the required inspection program. Consequences: Not performing the repair~ of the bridges would be against the State Bridge Inspection Program. Lack of conformance with this IJrogram would lead to the repid decay of these bridges and resultant exposure ofthe traffic to potential danger. Ultimately the lack of repairs would lead to the posting of load limits on the bridges restricting traffic over the bridges including refuse vehicles and possibly emergency vehicles. The best approach is to keep repairs in pace with the inspections so that the planning for the bridge replacement will occur in the most economic methods available. 55 "II Lauridsen Blvd Bridge Widening Project #: TR-42 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves widening the current Pre-Construdion: $150,000 bridge to allow the use of the bridge by trucks and buses. The Land/Right-of-Way: $0 project could involve widening on the north and south sides of Construction: $1,700,000 the bridge. Other: $0 Total: $1,850,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $1,665,000 - Ratesrraxes: $185,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,850,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $1,850,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Grant TIB Grant $1,665,000 Taxes General Fund $185,000 $1,850,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 6 Justification: This project is identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a necessary project to move trucks on an alternative route to using streets in the downtown area. Currently trucks must go through downtown to access the waterfront and Daishowa on the west side of the harbor. Widening this bridge would allow use by trucks and buses. They can not use the bridge now due to. inadequate turning width. Consequences: ot complying with the Comprehensive Plan and reducing the level of service. 56 'T '" Black Diamond Road Bridge Replacement Project #: TR-Ol Project Description Estimated Project Costs I This Transportation project involves the replacement of the P(e-Construction: $0 Black Diamond Bridge over US 1 0 1. This bridge is just south Land/Right-of-Way: $0 of the city limits and work to replace the bridge will involve Construction: $38,273 the alignment of the north approach which is in the City. Our Other: $0 Total: $38,273 share of the project would be based on a percentage of the Estimated Project Funding work required to be performed in the City. The approach work Fund Transfer: $0 will realign the approach to a more straight alignment Donations/Grants/Loans: $38,273 benefiting the City. RatesfT axes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $38,273 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $38,273 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Grant Sources of Funding IPortion of 1996 ISTEA allocation Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: Yes Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 7 Justification: A high priority project for Clallam County is the replacement of this bridge. The bridge is a wooden structure over US 101 and needs to be replaced. The northern part of the project will involve straightening the approach to the bridge thereby improving safety. Consequences: Failure of the bridge. Not funding our portion will leave the bridge approach in a less than desirable condition, espe~ially when the opportunity is available to correct the configuration. 57 11 LincolnlBlvd Rechannelization and Signal Project #: TR-18 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves providing for the Pre-Construction: $32.000 rechannelization and signalization for the Lincoln Street an LandIRight-of-Way: $0 Lauridsen Blvd intersection. Construction: $421,000 Other: $0 Total: $453,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/GrantslLoans: $0 RatesfTaxes: . $453,000 . Unknown: $0 Total: $453,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $453,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund-Street Fund l $453,000 $453,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 8 Justification: This project is the third phase of the projects needed to provide for al altrnate route for through traffic to get to the harbor rather than going through the downtown area as is described in the Comprehensive Plan. Consequences: ILack of compliance with the Comp Plan. 58 ~ Truck Route at USIOl Intersection Project #: TR-17 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves providing westbound to P..Construction: $150,000 northbound access from USIOI to the Tumwater Truck Route. Land/Right-of-Way: $150,000 Construction: $850,000 Other: $0 Total: $1,150,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 Ratesrr axes: $1,150,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,150,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,150,000 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund - Street I $1,150,000 $1,150,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 9 Justification: The City Comprehensive Plan describes the need to provide truck access from the westbound direction onto the Truck Route in the northbound direction. This ability would provide for another method for trucks to reach the harbor without using the downtown area for access. Consequences: ILack of compliance with the Comp Plan. 59 - Chip Seal Program Project #: TR-22 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves chip sealing 5 miles of Pre-Construction: $0 arterials and residential streets. LandlRight-of.Way: $0 Construction: $640,000 Other: $0 Total: $640,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 Ratesrraxes: $840,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $840,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $240,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Taxes Sources of Funding IReal Estate Excise Taxes Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Department Priority: 15 J ustiflcation: Streets must be maintained to maintain safe routes for vehicles. Consequences: Eventually streets not maintained will require much more expensive rebuilding. 60 Sidewalk Program Project #: TR-74 Project Description . Estimated Project Costs I This Transportation project involves constructing new Pre-Construction: $30,000 sidewalks on arterials with priority given to school walking Land/Right-of-Way: $0 routes. Part of the program provides for a local grant to Construction: $490,000 property owners to construct sidewalks adjacent to their Other: $0 Total: $520,000 property based on a priority system. The basic program will Estimated Project Funding involve sidewalks on one side of the arterial. 1998 - Sidewalk in the Franklin School area, 1999 - 2003 - Undetermined. Fund Transfer: $510,000 Donations/Grants/Loans: $10,000 - RateslTaxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $520,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $160,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60.000 $60,000 $60,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding 1 Fund Transfer General Fund - Street Vacation proceeds $490,000 Fund Transfer General Fund - Street Vacation proceeds to match grant-1996 $20,000 Grant Transportation Improvement Board Grant - 1996 $10,000 $520,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 29 Justification: Many of our arterials do not have sidewalks on them. This project will construct sidewalks on arterials with priority given to areas by schools and other high pedestrian traffic areas. Construction of sidewalks is a high priority ofthe City Council. The I 996.program will consist of sidewalks around the High School completing a walking loop incorporating new sidewalks that are being constructed by Albertsons and the new library on Boulevard. During 1996 we would also continue the city grant program for other locations on a priority based system. During other years the program will be better defined after the City-Wide Transportation Plan is completed. Consequences: o additional sidewalks. 61 11 CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN NON-FUNDED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS 62 ~ Downtown Streetscape Project #: TR-19 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves providing for the Pre-Construction: $200,000 integration of beautification elements into the streets and Land/Right-of-Way: $0 sidewalks downtown. Additional planters, benches, waste Construction: $1,800,000 recepticals and sidewalk treatment is envisioned. Other: $0 Total: $2,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfT axes: $2,000,000 - Unknown: $0 Total: $2,000,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Funs-Street Fund or Bonds Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 10 Justification: The downtown area has expressed a concern about the need to improve the image of the downtown by adding additional street scape materials and improve the sidewalks. Consequences: IUse of the existing facilities. 63 "e" Street and Fairmont LID Project #: TR-97 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves providing storm Pre-Construction: $230,000 drainage, roadways, sidewalks and utilities in an undeveloped Land/Right-of-Way: $0 aarea of the city. LID-no cost to city if property owners Construction: $2,070,000 approve LID. Other: $0 Total: $2,300,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $2,300,000 . Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $2,300,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Fund Transfer Sources of Funding ILID Construction Fund Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 11 Justification: This area of the city does not have improved roadways or a storm drainage system. In order to respond to requests by some proprty owners in the area an LID would have to occur to provide the necessary improvements. Consequences: ILack of improvements to the area and possibility of restricting growth to the area. 64 18th Street Reconstruction Project #: TR-16 Project Description . Estimated Project Costs I This Transportation project involves reconstructing 18th pre-Construction: $300,000 Street from the Landfill to "E" Street with curb, gutter, landlRight-of-Way: $0 sidewalks and a 40 foot roadway. Construction: $3,000,000 Other: $0 Total: $3,300,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/loans: $0 Rates/Taxes: $3,300,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $3,300,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund-Street Fund Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 12 Justification: The existing roadway is becoming too narrow to handle the traffic as the area grows. There are no sidewalks for foot traffic and bicycles have difficulty with conflicts with vehicles. Consequences: Continued use of the narrow roadway. 65 11 Lauridsen Blvd Reconstruction Project #: TR-21 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves reconstructing Lauridsen Pre-Construction: $180,000 Blvd from the Truck Route to "L" Street. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $1,620,000 Other: $0 Total: $1,800,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 . Ratesrraxes: $1,800,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,800,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund-Street Fund Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 13 Justification: The existing roadway is becoming too narrow to handle the traffic as the area grows. There are no sidewalks for foot traffic and bicycles have difficulty with conflicts with vehicles. Consequences: IContinued use of the narrow roadway. 66 - Laurel Street/ Ahlvers Road Reconstruction Project #: TR-04 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves reconstructing Laurel Pre-Construdion: $90,000 Street from Viewcrest to Ahlvers Road and Ahlvers Road Land/Right-of-Way: $0 from Laurel Street to Peabody Street providing a 40 foot wide Construdion: $810,000 roadway, curb, gutter, sidewalks and drainage control. Other: $0 Total: $900,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfTaxes: $900,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $900,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund - Real Estate Excise Tax I $900,000 $900,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 14 Justification: The existing roadway is narrow with ditches on both sides, except where developments have provided the improvements. The area served by these arterials is growing creating the need to widen these roadways. Consequences: IContinued use of narrow roadways without sidewalks. 67 Mt Angeles RoadlPorter Street LID Project #: TR-70 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves the construction of Pre-Construction: $200,000 roadways, storm drainage and other utilities. LID-no cost to Land/Right-of-Way: $0 city if property owners approve LID. Construction: $1,800,000 Other: $0 Total: $2,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $2,000,000 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfTaxes: $0 - Unknown: $0 Total: $2,000,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 W W W W W W First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Fund Transfer Sources of Funding ILID Construction Fund I $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 16 Justification: This area has narrow roadways - some of which are paved with BST surfacing which is difficult or impossible to maintain. The area has a ditch and culvert drainage system that experience problems. Consequences: ILack of adequate urban facilities. 68 10th Street Reconstruction Project #: TR-IO Project Description . Estimated Project Costs I This Transportation project involves reconstructing 10th Pre-Construction: $120,000 Street from "I" Street to Milwaukee Drive with curb, gutter, Land/Right-of-Way: $0 sidewalk and 40 foot wide roadway and 37 foot wide roadway Construction: $1,080,000 beyond Milwaukee Drive to the end. Other: $0 Total: $1,200,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfTaxes: $1,200,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,200,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Taxes Sources of Funding lGeneral Fund-Street Fund Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 17 Justification: 10th Street is an important arterial connecting east and west from "I" Street to Milwukee Drive. There are no sidewalks and the existing roadway is narrow by arterial standards. Consequences: Continued use of the existing facility. 69 11 5th Street Reconstruction Project #: TR-60 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves reconstructing 5th Street Pre-Construction: $90.000 from Lincoln Street to Ennis Street with curbs, gutter, LandlRight-of-Way: $0 sidewalks and a new signal 5th and Race intersection. Construction: $690,000 Other: $0 Total: $780,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $624,000 RatesfTaxes: $156,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $780,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $780,000 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Grant TIB Grant $624,000 Taxes General Fund @ 20% Match $156,000 $780,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 18 Justification: The project is needed to improve the roadway pavement conditions between Peabody and Race Streets and to add a signal at 5th and Race intersection for traffic flow improvements. The section between from Francis Street to the west is especially poor over the Peabody Creek culverts where the roadway section does not include curb, gutter, and sidewalk.. Consequences: If the project is not funded roadway maintenance of the roadway will increase and traffic accidents at 5th and Race Street will increase to increased volumns and conflicts at the intersection. 70 8th Street Reconstruction Project #: TR-61 Project Description Estiltlllted Project Costs This Transportation project involves the reconstruction of 8th Pre-Construction: $200,000 Street from Cherry Street to Race Street including removing Land/Right-of-Way: $0 the existing asphalt and overlaying the roadway and Construction: $1,600,000 modification ofthe traffic signal at 8th and Cherry. Other: $0 Total: $1,800,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $1,440,000 - RatesfTaxes: $360,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,800,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Grant TIB Grant $1,440,000 Taxes General Fund or Bonds $360,000 $1,800,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 19 Justification: This Public Works project involves improving roadway conditions. The pavement has reached the end of its life cycle and maintenance of the surface is costly and difficult due to the volume of traffic on the roadway. This arterial is a critical link between the east and west sections of the city and maintenance of a good roadway surface enhances the economics of using the roadway. The roadway has been overlayed a number of times resulting in a high roadway crown and little or no gutters. This causes poor drainage control and extra maintenance. In addition, the pavement surface has developed wheel rutting due to heavy wear of the surface. This wheel rutting is a place for water to accumulate during rains and can result in hydroplaning of tires. The existing signal is constructed with poles and span wires and old style and sized signal heads without loop detection or pedestrian signals. Installation of an updated signal configuration will improve safety and the efficiency of the signal to move traffic on 8th Street which is a vital arterial across the city. Consequences: Continued increased maintenance, escalated costs for final repair, increased costs for users of the roadway due to roadway roughness and potential for additional accidents. If not funded the current signal will continue to provide service for the intersection, but at a lower service level. As traffic increases on 8th Street, the need for this upgrade will increase. 71 ,.. 1!11' City-Wide Traffic Signal Interconnect/Pre-emption Project #: TR-13 Projl!ct Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves acquiring the equipment Pre-Construction: $50,000 o interconnect all the traffic signals to the city to allow LandlRight-of-Way: $0 computer control ofthe signals to improve traffic flow. The Construction: $450,000 project also involves installing ore-emption on all remaining Other: $0 Total: $500,000 signals and all emergency vehicles. Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfTaxes: $500,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $500,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund-Street Fund Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 20 Justification: Existing signals are either fixed timed controllers or traffic actuated by loops in the street. Installation of operation of a computerized traffic control system would allow the entire signal system to work as a unit. Different areas of the city have very different traffic control issues that must be dealt wit, but often dealing with those areas individually impact other areas. The morning and evening peak traffic flows of State Route 101 could be dealt with more efficiently with a fully programmable computer controlled traffic signal system as could traffic to and from the Victoria Ferries in the downtown. Consequences: IContinued use of the old controllers. 72 "T Park Avenue Reconstruction Project #: TR-12 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves reconstructing Park Pre-Construction: $140,000 A venue from Peabody Street to Peninsula College with curb, Land/Right-of-Way: $0 gutter, sidewalks and a 40 foot wide roadway. Construction: . $1,260,000 Other: $0 Total: $1,400,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslT axes: $1,400,000 - Unknown: $0 Total: $1.400,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 W W W W W W First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund-Street Fund Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 21 Justification: The existing roadway is narrow and without sidewalks or drainage control other than ditches. This arterial serves the area by the College and the south side of an elementry school. Consequences: IContinued use of the narrow roadway. 73 White's Creek Crossing Project #: TR-14 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves providing for an arterial Pre-Construction: $500,000 crossing of White's Creek to connect Golf Course Road with Land/Right-of-Way: $750,000 Race Street. Construction: $5,000,000 Other: $0 Total: $6,250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 Ratesrraxes: $6,250,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $6,250,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,250,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund-Street Fund Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 22 Justification: The City's Comprehensive Plan describes the need for an additional east/west cross town arterial. This arterial will need to cross White's Creek at either Sth Street or Lauridsen Blvd or some other location. This arterial is necessary to improve east/west circulation of traffic and improve emergency services. Consequences: !Not following the Comp Plan. 74 1IlI Rhoads Road Area LID Project #: TR-69 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves constructing roadway Pre-Construction: $84,000 and drainage systems in an area that is experiencing drainage Land/Right-of-Way: $0 problems and has narrow roadways. LID-no cost to city if Construction: $756,000 property owners approve LID. Other: $0 Total: $840,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $840,000 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfT axes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $840,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 W W W W W W First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Fund Transfer Sources of Funding lLID Construction Fund Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 23 Justification: This area has narrow roadways and a problem plagued drainage system of ditches and culverts. The project would improve both of these situations. Consequences: ILack of adequate urban facilities. . 75 ~ 1st and Peabody Signal Project #: TR-02 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves upgrading the existing Pre-Construction: $8,000 signal with pedestrian signals, pre-emption traffic loops, Land/Right-of-Way: $0 drainage, ADA, channelization, and larger signal heads on Construction: $192,000 mast arms. Other: $0 Total: $200,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $180,000 - RatesITaxes: $20,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $200,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Grant Transportation Grant or ISTEA Funds $180,000 Taxes General Fund - Street Fund Reserves $20,000 $200,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 24 Justification: The existing signal is constructed with poles and span wires and old style and sized signal heads without loop detection or pedestrian signals. Installation of an updated signal configuration will improve safety and the efficiency ofthe signal to move traffic on 8th Street, which is a vital arterial across the city. Consequences: If not funded the current signal will continue to provide service for the intersection, but at a lower service level. As traffic increases on Peabody Street. the need for this upgrade will increase. 76 ~ " 10th/13th and "I" I"M" Street LID Project #: TR-71 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves providing utilities, storm Pre-Construction: $120,000 drainage and roadway improvements by LID. LID-no cost to Land/Right-of-Way: $0 city if property owners approve LID. Construction: $1,080,000 Other: $0 Total: $1,200,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $1,200,000 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,200,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Fund Transfer Sources of Funding ILID Construction Fund Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 25 Justification: This project would provide urban facilities to an area with gravel roadways and a limited drainage system. Consequences: ILack of urban facilities. 77 Milwaukee Drive Phase I Project #: TR-07 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project will extend Milwaukee Drive in Pre-Construdion: $200,000 two phases. Phase I would extend the roadway from "N" LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Street to 18th Street and Phase II would extend the roadway Construdion: $1,800,000 from 18th Street to the Lower Elwha Road. Other: $0 Total: $2,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesfTaxes: $2,000,000 . Unknown: $0 Total: $2,000,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund-Street Fund Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 26 Justification: The extension of Milwaukee Drive to the west is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan to provide service to the west end of the city. Consequences: IAn incomplete arterial network system. 78 Milwaukee Drive Phase II Project #: TR-08 Project Description . Estimated Project Costs I This Transportation project will extend Milwaukee Drive in P,ll-Construction: $320.000 !two phases. Phase I would extend the roadway from "N" LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Street to 18th Street and Phase II would extend the roadway Construction: $2.880,000 from 18th Street to the Lower Elwha Road. Other: $0 Total: $3,200,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslT axes: $3,200,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $3,200,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund-Sstreet Fund Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 27 Justification: The extension of Milwaukee Drive to the west is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan to provide service to the west end of the city. Consequences: An incomplete arterial network system. 79 111 Lauridsen BlvdlWashington Street Reconstruct Project #: TR-80 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves reconstructing the Pre-Construction: $40,000 intersection of Blvd and Washington Street to improve the LandlRight-of-Way: $0 access to the arterial and reduce the grades of Washington Construction: $210,000 Street as it intersects Blvd. Other: $0 Total: $250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $125,000 RateslTaxes: $125,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $250,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Sources of Funding 1 Donation Port Angeles School District $125,000 Taxes General Fund $125,000 $250,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 28 Justification: The intersection of Blvd and Washington Streets next to Franklin Elementry School is not adequate to address the increasing traffic. In addition, the grade of Washington as it intersects Blvd is steep and during the winter it is difficult for cars and buses to stop at the intersection. The intersection has additional conflicts on the north side due to a triangular shaped property that divides the two streets. These streets will need to be ~edesigned to provide perpendicular intersections eliminating the angled access. Consequences: Continued congestion in the area and difficult intersection access. 80 '" Hill Street Intersection Reconstruction Project #: TR-05 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves reconstructing the Pre-Construction: $29,000 alignment of the Hill Street and 4th Street and 4th Street to Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Marine Drive. Construction: $261,000 Other: $0 Total: $290,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/GrantsILoans: $0 e RatesITaxes: $290,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $290,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 W W W W W W First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Taxes Sources of Funding IGeneral Fund - Real Estate Excise Tax Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 30 Justification: This intersection occurs at the top of a hill which makes the sight distance a problem for the intersection. The reconstruction would remove the sight distance problem. Consequences: Continued use of the intersection in its current layout. 81 8th and "C" Street Signal Project #: TR-06 Projt!ct Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves installing a new traffic Pre-Construction: $8,000 signal at the 8th Street and liCit Street intersection. LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Construction: $162,000 Other: $0 Total: $170,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $153,000 RateslTaxes: $17,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $170,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Grant Transportation Grant or ISTEA Funds $153,000 Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $17,000 $170,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 3 1 Justification: As the west end of the city continues to grow, this intersection will reach a point where a signal is needed to meet the needs of traffic traveling north and south across 8th Street. Currently the north/south legs have stop signs. Consequences: Continued use of the existing intersecJion. 82 Street Bicycle Facilities Project #: TR-20 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Transportation project involves providing for bicycle P,'e-Construction: $0 events and modifications to the existing arterials to better Land/Right-of-Way: $0 accomodate their use by bicycles. Construction: $133,000 Other: $7,000 Total: $140,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $140,000 . Unknown: $0 Total: $140,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Taxes Sources of Funding IGenera1 Fund-Street Fund I $140,000 $140,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Street Department Priority: 32 Justification: The current arterial system, except for a few locations, does not provide for separate bicycle facilities or provide for separate bicycle facilities or provide signage for bicycle routing. This project would assist in improving the safety of bicyclists throughout the city by providing separate facilities, as needed or bicycled routes signed throughout the city as well as events to promote use of bicycles. Consequences: ILack of bicycle facilities. 83 ....,....-..-.... ... CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN ENTERPRISE PROGRAM The Enterprise Program element of the Capital Facility Plan comprises the Electric, Water, WasteWater, Solid Waste and Storm Water Utility programs. Combined they represent 61% of the $43,720,983 Capital Facilities Plan. Funding for the various projects will come from a variety of sources. A total of $19,500,256 will come from City Funds - $1,804,525 from the Light Fund, $5,349,731 from the Water Fund, $4,450,000 from the Waste Water Fund, $5,206,000 from the Solid Waste Fund, and $2,690,000 from the Stormwater Fund (would require a new utility). The remaining $7,114,454 will come from Outside Funds - $2,882,982 from Public Works Trust Fund Loans (paid back from utility rates), $2,850,000 from new Revenue Bonds, $1,257,472 from Public/Private Donations, and $124,000 from State and Federal Grants. Electric 7% Transportation 26% Water 26% General Purpose 13% Stormwater 6% Solid Waste 12% CAPIT AL FACILITIES PLAN PROGRAM AMOUNT General Purpose $5,680,000 Transportation $11,426,273 Enterprise $26,614,710 TOTAL CAPITAL PROGRAM $43,720,983 85 w ~ o i'! ~ i ~ ~ l!' ~ 5 ~ ~ ! 8 o : 0 I- ~ ~ ~ '" 0 a. I- o I- ~ a 8 '" 0 a. I- o I- 8 a 8 '" '" 0 a. I- o I- ~ a 8 '" 0 a. I- o l- I a 8 '" 0 a. I- o I- g a 3 '" 0 a. .., ;i z ~ ::> ~ ~ ~ ll' 0 o ;i ~ t;; g 0 8 I- ~ 0 I- 0( w .. 1-. a 0 e a:: 0 .. o a Q '" a. CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN ZZZ>->-ZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZ>->- ~~~~~~~~ ~srii;!g~~ lIS.., N 000000000 ENTERPRISE CAPITAL OUTLAY 1 o ~ ~ ~ "':.ox ;; - (;'i N ~ 0 ~ ...: ,..: CD c;; 000000000000 00000 ~ooooo~ ci ci ... ... 00000 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;;t~ 0050~~ ~ ~~ - ~ ~ olri ... '" oooo~ ~ ~~~oooo~ooo~ siN"': u; ..,j i1S ~ II) CD ~ 000000000 88 ~~ ~~~~880 ::i;;t;!t!ig ~ N ~. 0 ~_ 8 ~ ~ g~~ N ~8~~8~~~5~8~ ~~gi;!~~~~g~g M w -' I- ;::: I- U W .., o a: 0.. a: w :x: U I- '" ~ :J Ul Z VJ I- o wCl 5 I- UlZ"U :;~a:a:za: tn:J5o~u ~criut;gS VJ~"':JUi= -'OJ< ~ OZOI-" VJI-C>ozVJz I-I-Uo"'ji ggll!~~~ e:e:~~::j~ ~~:X:VJ;!:ttl 88~~~~ l!! () w ~ II. I- :r C> ::; ~ u ~ ~ ~ (!) " ~ w w C> w W 0.. VJVJ:J ~CD~998:g2lb~ ....J ..J ....J ...J ...J ..J ....J ..J ..J ..J uuuuuuuuuu ~ ii' o ii' a. _NM....l()co,.....com~ Ul o ~ o ll:: ! ~ ~~ :x: - ,,0:: ::it; I- :J w 0 w Z 0:: - ~~ 1-0 Z 0.. :(0:: 0..:( VJCIl I- I- UU WW 00 a: a: a: w 0.. 0.. I- 0 0 Z Z Z w:J:J U........ CIlI-I- ZJ:J: oC>C> ~::;::; ffi@~ 0.. I- < 0<'" I- 0 0 J: ~ ~ C>~I- ::; u. 0 ~ 0 I- U ~ I- o I- ~ ~ 8 i ~ ~ ~ ill 15 3 8 ~ ~ 5 I ~ I- o l- i a 8 '" 0 a. I- o l- S W .. :<: a 0 '" 0 a. I- o I- ~ a ~ '" 0 .. I- ~ 0 I- III .. o 0 '" 0 a. I- o ... ! a 3 '" 0 a. I- o ... ; a :g 0: 0 a. .., ;i ~ .... ~ ~ II ~ ll' 0 o ~ ~ .. e i3 8 I- ~ ~ ~ e ~ 8 a. w -' I- ;::: I- U W .., o a: 0.. o a Q 0: a. ~ ii' o ii' a. 86 z z z z z >- Z >- z >- z >- Z Z >- z z Z >- >- >- >- z z >- >- z z z >- Z z z z z >- :~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O ~8~g~;!g~g~~~~~~~~ NNNZ5I"'-C')..........US..__M: N N oooooooo~ooooo~ooo ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ 8 ~ 8 0 8 0 ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ gg~ "''''t - o ~ g o 0 0 0 000 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 000000008 o N -. - 000 0 000 808 ~ ~ ooooo~ ori ... o 08 ori '" '" 08 ~ 80888~888 o ~~~gg~~ ..... ~ .......... It) ... ....- - o N 0 CD '" N N N MOOCOOOOO ... ;; N ,....- CD '" 8 0 8 ~ ~ gg oooo~ ori ... ~g oriN al ~ .ai ~ 8 gg .., ~ 00 8 8 gg CD CD ~M 000 8 8 ~ g ;! ~: _ 0 .... ~..t 000000 8 ~ ui .." CD N '" 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 8~88~888888~888880 88 ~~~g~ogooo~orioriooori~ orio C!)CS~NCSt::M!;;:~~fl)t;t""'N~""''''' ~~ ~~ N N .~ ~88~~8~~~8~~888~8~ 8~ ~~~g~;!ggg~g~~~g~~g~~ CfiCS~NCS""(",)N"'''''<OCD t"') ,....;n ~~ N ri ~N Ul I- U w .., o 0:: II. II:: w I- ~ = ;:: > CIlUlCll >:: >:: >:: ~ ~ ~ w w w 000 iii iii iii e) ~~~ :5Ula: ~~~o::fbll!~ a:a:a:wO::!i ~~~1)~O~ ~~~~>=~o-ll! ~ ~ ~ ll! ~ >:: li; b:g~~~I-I-a:>- 001-1-I-UlW 0 ,,(!)~~~~5ffio ~~888Q88~ ;:; w Z o ~ ;1j Ul ~ffi~~ ffi~~~~ ~ :5 :x: u iil ~~~g~ ~I-wa:z ~~~~2 5~~zG VJ :x: Z ~ :I: l- e) W Z u. o z i= iii U 5 w VJ ... W Z 0:: iii 0 QZ VJO o..~ i ~ -' -' w'" UlCll I- I- UU W W ca a: a: )- a. Q.. Q.. I- ~ 00 ::; Q.VJzz (3 w>:l:l c( a::a::u.u. LLa.LL.Q..O:O: 5~~ffi~~ ~~2~ ~~ ~~~~~~ o~:;:l'5oo 1i)wdo~~ ou:Ju~1- ~~8~15g uVJ~C>~ I- o I- ~ ~ ~ :? q ~ C? ~ ~ q ~ ~ &;; &? ~ :? ~ q ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ... N ("') .. &0 co ,.... CD :: ~ ~ :! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l!l li1 ~ ~ o 2 5 i ~ .... o .... i a ~ 0: 0 Q. .... o .... ~ a 8 0: 0 Q. .... o .... ow", 0(30 N 0: 0 Q. .... o .... 8 w "' li: a 0 0: 0 Q. .... o .... I! a 8 0: 0 Q. .... o .... ! a 8 0: 0 Q. " ;t i!: .... ~ i :g II ~ 0 o ~ I: :n 208 .... ~ ~ t; g ~ 8 Q. o a Q 0: Q. ~ i W ...J ... ~ I- U W (3 ex: 0.. ~ u w a It: lL ex: w I- ~ W I- Ul ~ ~ ~ 0", (!)(!) ww ww mm I: 0: o 0: Q. CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN >->-ZZ>- ZZZZZ ~~~~~~~ i~~~~~~ ...: N."j..,j 0000000 00 ~ ~ g8 ~ N o 0 ~ g M OOOO~~~ ~~~ NNN ~~ooo~~ ~g ~~ 0000000 0000000 0000000 ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ N ..- ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ...: f'i..,j.. w o ~ (!) 0.. :::l M ex: 00 w ~ ... cr: mi!!:l( 0 zcr:wl-l- ~~~~~ t;~~~ffi o..~5Lt:~ ::l: cr: I- 5 ~5mo~ cr:u...J1- !!;!u.~mffi ~5:::l~~ m(!):)oca ~ .o C; 1!l l<l ~~~~~ ...... N M .. en ENTERPRISE CAPITAL OUTLAY 2 ~ ~ ii i. l!l",_ li1 ~ o 5 g ~ ~ I: ~ :n u ~ 8 .... a ~ t; '" ~ 8 Q. .... o .... ~ a ~ 0: 0 Q. .... o :n ~ ill 0 ~ 0 Q. .... ~ ~ ~ 0: 0 Q. .... ; ~ ~ If 0 .... m 0 .... 0> W "' ~ 0 0 0: 0 Q. Cl ;t Z .... ~ ~ ~ II ~ 0 o ~ I: :n ~ iJ 8 .... ~ ~ t; g ~ 8 Q. mm I- I- uu ~~ 00 ex:cr: 0..0.. 00 zz :l:l u.u. a: a: w w I- I- ~ ~ ;: ;: fil ~ :;: u. 00 ~ ;;! ::l: I- u. 0 01- ;;! I- o I- W ...J ... ~ I- U W (3 ex: 0.. o a Q 0: Q. I: 0: o 0: Q. >-ZZZZZ ZZZ>-ZZ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~g ...: N o~ooooo~ g g ~ ~ ~ ~g~ o ~ ~ g~ o~~~~ g~~~ o ~ g 000 00 ~O~ g 8 q N.. ~ ~ o 0 ~ o iZ ooooo~ g 00000000 00000000 ~~~8~~88 sig8~ggsig inN....NNOUSte ...: N 8~88~888 sig80ggsig i1) N .... ~ N 0 i7:l r-. ...: N mU. Z u. 03 ~ m m ~ e..>ffi~ ~ ~~~~ .... o:oml- ~ 0 ~ w ffi lL ::l: Z (!) > 0: 0:c;;~5 w 0<(:I:e..> I- ~ale..>z ~ tu[555 iIi! ~:;: cr: ~ o I- e..> l!! - ~~~~I~ ~~5~~ ~ ci: o 99:2 cr: cr: ~ 000 ... N C") ... e.n co 87 0.. ::l: Z - 00:: t= ~ ~ ~ tu ::l: o ex: ~ ~ ~~ mW zS ~~ I-...J ~:ij .oM "? 0 cr: I 015 ~ ~ ~ i l!l li1 ~ ~ o 2 I: ~ :n u ~ 8 .... o .... i a S 0: 0 Q. ~~ ~~ .... o .... l:l w "' lil a 0 0: 0 Q. .... o .... ~ a 8 0: 0 Q. .... o .... 8 w "' li: a 0 0: 0 Q. .... ; ~ 8 0: 0 Q. .... o .... i a 8 0: 0 Q. Cl ;t i!: .... ~ i 8 II ~ 0 o ~ I: :n ~ i3 8 .... ~ M t; g ~ 8 Q. mm I- I- e..>e..> W W ca cr: ex: 0.. a. ex: ex: W W I- I- ~ ~ 0: 0: 00 1-1- mm ~~ :;: u. 00 Z...J <( <( ::l:1- u.O 01- ;;! I- o I- W ...J ... ~ l- e..> W ..., o tt: a. o a 9 0: Q. I: 0: o 0: Q. z>->-zz zzzz>- ~~~~~~~ 8888cD88 IN W') N ("') ,.... iN "':"':ri M~ 0000000 0000000 0000000 O~~~O~8 88:G 8:G Il() N..... ,.... co "':N" MM 000 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 8 8 0 0 8 "! ~ 8 ~ 0 ~ ~g 06 g. o 0 8 8 N 00 8888888 ~~~~cD~~ "':"':N M.n 8888888 8si8sig8g N&nNM r-N . - N ri iii <fl <fl I- l- e..> e..> ~ ~ 00 ex: cr: a. a. z z w w woo zliilii i~~ ~~~~ > l!! <fl c;; e..> co o~ffiwffi~~~ ~~~~~~~~ Ulj:i~8~l!!~ WD::-'a:Uc(1L ~~~w~co ...J...J...JZI!!:i;;! LLLLLL~S::l:1- ~~~z3:u.o ~:)~8~~1- 0( I- o I- N ~ U") ..... C") ~~~~~ m<fl<fl<flm ..... N M .. U') 11[ ~ ~ riM N en N .o riM N 8 8 ~~ 8 8 ~~ N ~ 8 8g .o .. r-i. 88 gg N r-:~ 8 ~ a;j M N c; ricO 8~ g~ M N ~ 8 88 N N ~ ~ 8<5 N N ~ ~ MO N .... N N ricO N 8 ~ MN :!~ tre <flm 1-1- e..>e..> ww aa ex: ex: a. a. >- >- I- I- ::i::i ~ ~ :::l :::l oj W <( I- U. ~ 0 Z ...J <( <( ::l: I- U. 0 01- ...J 0( I- o I- IX 0 fZ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ IX 5 ~ '" ~ ffi N Lt ~ ~ - ~ ~ o '" '" ~ ffi g Lt ~ N x ~ </> :> < 0 o '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < 0 o '" r---;i o '" g: Lt ~ - ~ ~ I :~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < 0 o '" '" <:> ;;i z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ If 0 o ~ ~ ~ E iJ 8 ~ ;i ~ ~ ~ ~ B .. w -' .... ~ ~ u w (3 a: a.. ",-- o "l c o - '" i-!!:-- ~ ii: o ii: .. CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN ENTERPRISE CASH FLOW 1 ~ 8. N~g~ .....~ ooooooooooo~~~ ~~~ 000000000000 ooooooo~ ci .... o ~ 0 .0 .... ~o M 0000 00 ~~~~o 8;~12 '" 0000 ~~o civi .... '" 00 000 ~o~~~oooo~oo~~ ri siN"': Ill- fIi... VS~1ll co::~ l!! <.> w ... o a: II. I- % Cl ::; ~ i3q~ ClCl ClCl WW ww en en 000000000 ~. 0 ~. ~~~~~~~~o~~~ ~'.oM":":ci.o.o ,..:txi~' .-N........-(")CO .-.- ...- <Q> N (J) ...- N ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~6;~~:li~~g~!" M z o ~w ;5Z en:; men iil~ '"'~ III I- .... o w=> ea: ~t; ClZ Q..O =>0 '" => (I) wCl ~~ 5~ Uo "':0 -'0 Oz ClO ....0 ow =>a: ~li; ~i= 8~ w J: o .... ;: en .... 5 C>~ ~u e~ <.>~ =>< c~ zen 8~ wen a:-' ~~ p~ en en ........ 00 ww ... ... a:oo en wa:a: o 1-Q.11. a: zee <C wZZ ~~u=>=> ~~~~~ ~ig~~ 6~~c;::: ~~~~~~ :iweo<", ~wz~eo ~~~~I~ ....0-' 0 ltl~ll:~l:5"" l!:if<oCi! b .... l?:!!~!;jl:?~lIJ~q~ ...J~';'...J...J...J...J...J...J...J OOUOOOOOOO ....N("')...Io()CO,....COcn~ ~o txi ~ I ~ i fl B ~ '" ~ ffi s it ~ Ii: 5 ~ '" ~~ - -' ::I ~ ~ ~ ~ g '" ~~ ~ it ~ N 5 ~ '" ~ I it ~ - ~ ~ o '" Iii Ii ~ ~ - ~ ~ < 0 o '" ~ <:> ~ ~ li; Z '" 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ :;; e iJ 8 ~~ fOO ::.... ~~ ~~ ~~ ~f ~ ;;i 0 ~ o a '"8 ~ '" .. w -' .... ~ ~ U w (3 a: a.. ;:- ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ii: .. ~~~~ ~~g:! ~ lil~ ~ ~ 8 "'.... MfD OO"'WW:!!~~"''''OMO''''OO~OOO ~!;;t;to,...C5I3~ co fit r- ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ OO(,,)CO~CD~~NN~_~""'OOOOOO~~ t:~;:15.....C5&1~i!S~l5~ "'6 ~~~~~~~~~~g~ g~ ao(")~mCDIo()CDNN2""2""'000020 ,...~~o~~~[Dcsl3(S~ CS ~~~~~~~~g~g~ ~ O~~~~~~S~~~M2~000200 (S,.....,...o,...,OC:OCO(SCO(SLO cs ~~re~~~~~~g~gg ~ fila ..... (")COOCOO ~ ~ 15 NfO r-: CD '" '" ~.O~~lii~~~~O ~g~~:g":eg o fila .... <Ii (")OOCOOOOO t: a N ,...,- CD '" ~O ci '" ~~ ~~ 000000 OO~ ~ 00000000000000000000 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O ~~ ~~~~~~g12g12~:e:egg:e:e ~g CJ)~(S~~,...(').............iD.......-('I) coin -. N N ...- ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ggg12~~:egg:e:e8~~ CJ)~CSN~""'(,,)N....,...U5co"""'-M .....,....~ ~~ N ri viN =I~ > en en en :.:::.:::.:: ~~~ WwW l!! l:ll:ll:l u U5U5<n: w zzz ~ ~~~ A. a: a: a: a::: www loLl t-t-t- i ~~~ q~~~~ ClCl~~~ ClC>~~~ ltlltlooo eneneec ~ z o u z Sffla:a::~:li(l) fua:~oifia:z a:a:cO>~<ww ~g,~offi~~~~ O~~U)cn:3C1)u...J :;>-sll!w J::5~ woc....a:fh~Q..ii: a:w:.::en~a::X:ww ....t;;S>-;:j;~a;zo ~rx~g:I:~'1<N wz~~!!l~effi~;r;; oooiilo>-!zz~ ...ooQ..enJ:_<:X: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ en en ........ 00 wW 03 a: a: Q.. Q.. UJ ~ ~ ~irir a.. a: a: a: w w w I- ~ ~ ~ ~ wfn:1 en ~ < a: < ... ::l co 8 ~ ;t ... ~ .... -' ... 0 80.... ~ o .... ~ Q.. tJ::i ~ wU w Z u.. c:( e;; Q~~o..u.. ~!!20~w &l~g:2~ ~~~~~ !!2cUu:ii'l CZZI-::;! ~oQena <~~g5 ~~~lf~ wcnO(l)oIlI: ...-NM<Q> IllW"'" co.... N(")""W1 W,..., c:D(J) 0 .... ...- .... .- .... N 88 '" - lil51 ~~ S"~ 1 .: >! i ~ ~e en, ,'" 0'" .....t---=" cO -0 ~~ .. - ,,- ~~.- ~5o; ,,"'W ~j~ i ~ - "E ' j :!!!!! ~ ~ ~ Cl> ~~ 15 ci l: g~ .~~=? '?~~ CD_</> . . CI) ~i~ ":'.'21: c( '0.1;; ..... w CD t- ~~~ , ,N W CD . ~....._~ ~~~a: o ' 5.... en- , .00,..... on...'" ~~~ ~ . w :QCOU -,- , ~.g~ tiE'" ~8 .g C1iilD 8~.? -fi8~ en , 1) , on '" M"'-::' ~:"d"5 ~i<7 ~ ~~- >.... c 'E ...- (0 5 :;.3 U"2 u.. .:.~;: iIi@D;- ~'-.';'1; OM........ ~...-~ ! .&;:j .l!! ~~~ u.,>- Iii N!!!. 5~fij B~.9 ;~~ :g::~ ~m Cl> _ ,....- -tti - '" CD "'. CD on ;; ~ r-:<"i CD ~. s:!;o ~ <t. ~M '" 'TI'lI '" a: W W 0 ~ ~ '" 0- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 51 a: 0- ~ ~ ~ :r 0:: '" 5 0( a o W a: 0- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0( a o W a: 0- ~ ~ ~ iIil ~ 0( a o W a: 0- tn ~ ; .. ... W en ~ ~ 0( a o W a: 0- ;: z c i ~ ~ ~ ~ 0( a u W a: " -' z 0( ~ t- ~ c:i ~ ~ ~ 0 o ~ ~ :n g 0 8 0- -' 0 0- 0( W '" 8 ~ 8 0. 0- o w (3 9 a: 0. w -' ~ ~ ~ (,) w ...., o a:: c.. Ul .... o w ...., o II:: Q. D:: w .... ~ W .... Ul ~ :; 8 t!>>d> ClCl ww ww UlUl ~ Q' o Q' 0. o 0""" co 0 '" ..... ... .., uiN co :!: o 0 ,..... Q) '" ..... ... .., &tiN co ... ~ ~ ~ g8:lf ~ "'.., oo~t!;OOi~~ \ON I,tfMM co~ ~~:g o!O!::,~oooC!iC!i 0: .. fl'1 co CO Lt"i1l'iN" "':ri NCO:! ~~ gooooooog "": f'o: gooooooo:5 ..... ..... cD cD 0000000 ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ...: N ....- .. ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~8~ ....: C'\i..". w o ~ Cl c.. ::> .., 0:: ollW ~ ~ ~~~ ~ o ffi W ~ Ii: ~~~~~ ~(1)~::tffi w ::> <( ~ ~~O~~ ~6~6lii II:: U u:l ~ II:: ~~g;~~ lJlg~~~ ~~~~~ ... N M . I,() CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN ..... ..... C!i ;?; m- N ..... <0 '" on "":N ~ ~ !! 8:lfriri '" .., :g ~ ~ ~ ..... ..... riri :g lil ENTERPRISE CASH FLOW 2 " '" a: z W w a 0 ;: z '3 o ~ g 0- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0( a o ll! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 o ~ 0- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0( a o W a: 0- ~ i ~ :I: a: ~ ~ o W a: 0- ~ ~ ~ :r ~ '" 5 0( a o w a: 0- ~ ~ i * ~ 0( a u w a: " ;I. ;; 0- ~ ~ 8 z w 0 0( 0. o ~ ~ :n g 0 8 0- ~ ~ t? 000 0- a: 0 0. (J)(J) ~ ~ ou w w .... ...., 00 a:: a:: c.. c.. 00 z z ::>::> ... ... c:: II:: WW ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0-' w-' ~ <( <( ... 00 z-, ~~ ...0 o~ -' ~ o ~ W ..J ~ ~ I- (,) w ...., o a:: c.. 0- o a Q a: 0. ~ Q' o Q' 0. o ~ ~ ~ 0 ..... on 0'" ~ ~ ~ ;::g~ 00 ~o~~~~ :G g8gg '" '" '" 00 ~ ~ g~ 000 N co ..... ::; :s N":g :! ,.....~ lll"'on ... ~ :8 0);:::'0 :t ~ 00 !;m air:ci ;!: ~ OO!O! a) a) ... '" '" o 0 ~ on <0 ..... ~000008 g g 000000000 00000000 ~~~~~~~~ sig8gggsig I1)NVNNOi7)CO . N ~~~~~~~~ 8g8oggsig on '" ... ~ '" 0 111..... ....: N en ... Z ... 03 ~ m Ul t3ffi t:; z u: > !!l ~ 8 ~ ~ o::! W Q. :;; z ~ D:: c:: in <( w O<{J: ~ l-aJ<.J ~ ~wQ~c:: ~ c:::O: w o ~ U ~ ~8~~~ g 5 ~ ~ WU~o lJl~(3~ ED <( J: w 0:: .... z ffi 0 > ~ -' z :J w U I- ZW -,0 0:;; U 0:: Zo ::; ~ ):en 8 ~ m:r iti E; c.. ~ en en ~ ~ uu ww .... ...., 00 c:: a:: c.. c.. c.. ~ ffi ffi 0:: I- ~ l!;! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :;;00 D:: ~ ~ o en en li;fa~ W ~ <( w <(... ~ 00 ::> z-' ~ ~ ~ -' ... 0 :EO~ -' ~ o ~ 9N~:!~8 c::~ci:c"i:d: 000000 -NM'lltU')CO 89 '" W o a: :J g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <5 ~ Iz W ~ w a: 5 a W a: 0- z W ~ W a: 5 a w a: a: w :I: 0- o ;: a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" 0( u ;: Iz ~N ~ ~ ~ ~ 0( a o w a: ;: ffi 9 ~ ~ * ~ 0( a o w a: 0- e ~ ~ g: i?j ~ 0( a o w a: " ~ ~ t; ~ ~ 8 o ~-~ ~ g i3 8 0- ~ ~ t? o a 0 0- a: 0 0. w -' ~ ~ ~ (,) w ...., o a:: c.. 0- o a Q a: 0. ~ Q' o Q' 0. ~ ~ 88 ..... '" rilfi 0000000 0000000 0000000 o8~~o 88~ on '" ~ ":('I,j 000 ~ 0 0 8 "'. ~ o 0 g 8 8 808 '" :5 '" ~: .....- N 88 8:G ..... co criri ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~. ll'i<<i ..... co "'. ~ ~ 00 8 '" ~ ~ ~ 8 2cD 88 '" ..... '" cri&l'i 88~~~~~ 888sig8g N I,{) N M ,.... N . - N ri u'i z z woo I-Uii= Ul z ~ ~~(f) c ~ ffi w :i '" ... D:: O..en::> Ul-,zen uJ~g U ~ U -' -' -' -' -' -' u::: u::: u: 000 z Z Z ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ en en ..... N (I') ..,. L() en en ~ ~ uu ww .... ...., 00 a:: a:: c.. c.. ww .... .... z (J) CI) 5 ~ ~ ~ in (,) 00 It: ::> ::; ::; wa:: 00 > ~ (f) (f) 5~fa~ uo~<( c:: U <( ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ t'5 ~ U z -' tll ..... (") ~ l") C;>.., 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ en en en ~ i ~18 ... .., .N ~ N co <0 gri .., :g .N ~a oi,...... M. ~ N '" '" '" '" ..... '" ~g <0 '" ~u:i co on a; ~ .nC'i l") '" ..... Ol. 8 ~ riM ~ ~ N ~ ~ 88 '" '" 8 ~ 8<5 '" '" 8 ~ (l"j 0 '" .... '" '" Mu:;j '" ~~ MN ........ o <tt;fa:i '" en en ~ ~ uu ww ...., ...., 00 a:: c:: c.. c.. i:: ~ :J = - ~ 5::> o ...J l!;!:o! [3 ~ z -' ~ ~ ...0 o ~ -' ~ o ~ CITY OF PORT ANGELES 1998-2003 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN FUNDED ENTERPRISE PROJECTS 90 Upgrade "I" Street Substation Project #: CL-39 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This City Light project involves changing out the existing 7.5 Pre-Construction: $0 MY A substation transformer for a 12 MY A substation LandlRight-of-Way: $0 transformer and the addition of a circuit switcher. Construction: $500,000 Other: $0 Total: $500,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 - RatesIT axes: $500,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $500,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Rates Sources of Funding ILight Fund - Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Steve Hursh Division: Light Department Priority: 1 Justification: Much of our load growth over the last several years has been away from the center of the city to both the east and the west. At the west side of town there have been a large number of new subdivisions with new housing as well as much interest in new large commerciallindustria110ad additions at the Port's industrial park. This load growth has taken up almost all of our reserve capacity and requires the upgrading of the "I" Street Substation on the west side of town in order to allow for additional growth. Consequences: Ifthi~ project is not completed we will need to reduce our level of service and the degree of reliability that we currently offer to our customers or limit future growth on the west side ofthe city. 91 Construct Transmission Line Project #: CL-18 Projt!ct Description Estimated Project Costs This City Light project involves the construction of a new 69 Pre-Construction: $0 KV transmission line from our existing College Substation to Land/Right-of-Way: $20,000 the proposed Golf Course Road Substation. Construction: $86,000 Other: $10,000 Total: $116,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $116,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $116,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $13,475 $102,525 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates ILight fund - rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Steve Hursh Division: Light Department Priority: 2 Justification: Much of our load growth over the last several years has been away from the center of the city to both the east and the west. At the east side of town there have been a number of annexation proposals as well as acquisition of customers at the Pay1ess Plaza from the PUD. This load growth has taken up almost all of our reserve capacity and requires the construction of a new substation on the east side of town in order to allow for additonal growth. A new substation requires a transmission line. Consequences: Ifthis project is not completed we win need to reduce our level of service and the degree ofre1iability that we currently offer to our customers or limit future growth on the east side ofthe city, 92 11 Construct Golf Course Rd Sub Project #: CL-20 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This City Light project involves the construction of a new Pre-Construction: $0 distribution substation on property recently purchased by City Land/Right-of-Way: $66,670 Light adjacent to the BPA power lines at Golf Course Road. Construction: $357,000 Other: $0 Total: $423,670 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $423,670 - Unknown: $0 Total: $423,670 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $66,670 $57,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Rates Sources of Funding ILight Fund - Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Steve Hursh Division: Light Department Priority: 3 Justification: Much of our load growth over the last several years has been away from the center of the city to both the east and the west. At the east side of town there have been a number of annexation proposals as well as acquisition of customers at the Payless Plaza from the PUD. This load growth has taken up almost all of our reserve capacity and requires the construction of a new substation on the east side of town in order to allow for additional growth. Consequences: If this project is not completed we will need to reduce our level of service and the degree of reliability that we currently offer to our customers or limit future growth on the east side of the city. 93 10th Street Reconductoring Project #: CL-02 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This City Light project involves reconductoring an existing Pre-Construction: $0 overhead distribution line along 10th street from "N" street to LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Milwaukee Drive. This project was identified in our 1995 Construction: $44,000 Long Range Electric System Planning Study. Other: $0 Total: $44,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $44,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $44,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $44,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Rates Sources of Funding ILight Fund - Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Steve Hursh Division: Light Department Priority: 4 Justification: Loading calculations done as part of our 1995 long range study showed that this section of powerline was a weak link. System reliability and the potential to serve future growth was impacted. Consequences: If this project is not completed we will need to reduce our level of service and the degree of reliability that we currently offer to our customers. We would also need to limit future growth on the west side of the City. 94 "0" Street Reconductoring Project #: CL-03 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This City Light project involves reconductoring an existing Pre-Construction: $0 overhead distribution line along "0" street from 14th street to Land/Right-of-Way: $0 18th street and extending the line with new construction from Construction: $74,000 14th street to 10th street. This project was identified in our Other: $0 Total: $74,000 1995 Long Range Electric System Planning Study. Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $74,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $74,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $74,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Rates Sources of Funding ILight Fund - Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilties Department Contact: Steve Hursh Division: Light Department Priority: 5 Justification: Loading calculations done as part of our 1995 long range study showed that this section of powerline was a weak link. System reliability and the potential to serve future groWth was impacted. The extension from 14th street to 10th street also provides needed switching flexibility. Consequences: If this project is not compl~ted we will need to reduce our level of service and the degree ofreliability that we currently offer to our customers. We would also need to limit future growth on the west side of the City. 95 Install Substation Circuit Switches Project #: CL-06 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This City Light project involves installing a circuit switcher at Pi'e-Construction: $0 Washington Substation, Laurel Substation and "F" Street LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Substation. Construction: $210,000 Other: $0 Total: $210,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 - RateslTaxes: $210,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $210,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Rates Sources of Funding ILight Fund - Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Steve Hursh Division: Light Department Priority: 6 Justification: It has become standard utility practice to install a circuit switcher to protect substation equipment due to the potential oil cleanup costs and the costs of repairing/replacing the failed equipment. In the event of a transformer or switchgear failure the circuit switcher will open much quicker than the existing high side fuses to minimize damage. The transformers and switchgear in these substations is approximately 20 years old. Consequences: It the transformer tank ruptured we would need to clean up approximately 3,600 gallons of transformer oil in addition to spending tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars to repair/replace the equipment. 96 ~ '" Tree Trimming Project #: CL-08 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This City Light project involves trimming trees away from our Pre-Construction: $0 overhead high voltage powerlines. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $0 Other: $35,000 Total: $35,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $35,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $35,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates IElectric rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Steve Hursh Division: Light Department Priority: 7 Justification: Based on experience we have adopted a three-year tree trimming cycle to reduce the number of tree related power outages. Consequences: If this project is not completed we will need to reduce our level of reliability that we offer to our customers. 97 Paint Streetlight Standards Project #: CL-09 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This City Light project involves painting streetlight standards P,ll-Construction: $0 along Front Street and First Street from Lincoln Street to Golf LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Course Road. Construction: $0 Other: $65,000 Total: $65,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $65,000 . Unknown: $0 Total: $65,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates IElectric Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Steve Hursh Division: Light Department Priority: 8 Justification: The existing steel streetlight poles are rusting and the paint is peeling. There is approximately 142 poles that need to be painted. Consequences: The rusty streetlight poles degrades the appearance of the City and eventually the corrosion will reduce the strength of the poles. 98 .", Airport Industrial Park Project #: CL-07 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This City Light project involves installing the high voltage Pie-Construction: $0 underground "backbone" electrical distribution system and Land/Right-of-Way: $0 street lighting in the Port's proposed new industrial prk south Construction: $496,000 of the airport. Other: $161,472 Total: $657,472 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $657,472 RateslTaxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $657,472 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $657,472 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Donation Sources of Funding IFunding by Port or others Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Steve Hursh Division: Light Department Priority: 9 Justification: The Port is proposing to develop a new industrial park south ofthe airport which will require city utilities. The cost estimates provided here are very rough since the Port has not provided information as to the size of electrical loads they want to accommodate. It has also been assumed at this time that the Port or others would provide all necessary funding. Consequences: . lpower and street lighting services would not be available to the industrial park. 99 Light Operations Center Project #: CL-78 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This City Light project involves the relocation of our crew Pre-Construction: $0 quarters, warehouse and truck storage facilities to a single Land/Right-of-Way: $0 location adjacent to our existing pole yard and the City's Corp Construction: $847,000 Yard. The construction would only take place if and when our Other: $70,000 Total: $917,000 Front & Cherry operations center is sold. Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $500,000 RateslT axes: $417,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $917,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Donation Light Fund - Sale of old operations building $500,000 Rates Light Fund - Rates $417,000 $917,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Bob Titus Division: Light Department Priority: 10 Justification: If the Oak street convention center becomes a reality our existing operations center (across the street from the Port property) would become much more valuable as a site for commercial development. In addition the added traffic associated with a convention center would make it very difficult to maneuver our large equipment in and out of our existing facility. The City put our facility on the market in 1993 in an attempt t~ solicit interest from the private sector in developing commercial businesses without success. However, the City has indicated that its long term goal is to have the area develop as a commercial center. As a result City Light was authorized to seek out and obtain property suitable to contain all of its facilities at a single location. The final phase of the project is contingent on the sale of our existing facility at Front & Cherry and would require building new quarters for the crew, vehicles and small materials and equipment currently stored there. Consequences: Multiple locations for materials and equipment storage degrade efficiency and security. However, this project is completely contingent on selling our existing facility. 100 '" Downtown Watermains and Sidewalks III Project #: WT -28 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves the replacement of old Pre-Construction: $90,000 watermains in the downtown area. During the watermain Land/Right-of-Way: $0 replacement the sidewalks will also be replaced since the Construction: $842,713 mains are generally beneath the sidewalks. Other: $0 Total: $932,713 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $810,000 RateslTaxes: $122,713 Unknown: $0 Total: $932,713 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $850,000 $82,713 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Sources of Funding I Loan PWTF Loan $810,000 Rates Water Rates $122,713 $932,713 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: Justification: This project will replace a large portion of the old watermains in the downtwon area. These mains are late 1800-early 1900 construction and operate at over 120 pounds per square inch. In addition to replacement in kind, the mains along Railroad Avenue will be upgraded to provide adequate fire flow for future land uses along the waterfront. As mentioned above, an additional amount of PWTF loans are pending at the 1995 (?) logislature. Approval ofthese funds will allow additional lengths of watermains to be repaired. Consequences: Majority ofthe project is funded. Lack of proceeding with the project will ultimately result in watermain failures in the downtown area with resultant property damage and temporary loss of service. In addition, emergency repairs are more costly than planned repairs. 101 Downtown Watermains/Sidewalks IV Project #: WT -29 Proje,ct Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves the replacement of old Pre-Construction: $0 watermains in the downtown area. During the watermain LandlRight-of-Way: $0 replacement the sidewalks will also be replaced since the Construction: $1,000,000 mains are generally beneath the sidewalks. Other: Total: Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $800,000 RateslTaxes: $200,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,000,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 W W W W W W First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Loan PWTF $800,000 Rates Water Rates $200,000 $1,000,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 2 Justification: This project will replace a large portion of the old watermains in the downtwon area. These mains are late 1800-early 1900 construction and operate at over 120 pounds per square inch. In addition to replacement in kind, the mains along Railroad Avenue will be upgraded to provide adequate fire flow for future land uses along the waterfront. As mentioned above, an additional amount of PWTF loans are pending at the 1995 (?) logislature. Approval of these funds will allow additional lengths of watermains to be repaired. Consequences: Majority ofthe project is funded. Lack of proceeding with the project will ultimately result in watermain failures in the downtown area with resultant property damage and temporary loss of service. In addition, emergency repairs are more costly than planned repairs. 102 '" Downtown Watermains/Sidewalks V Project #: WT -30 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves the replacement of old Pre-Construction: $0 watermains in the downtown area. During the watermain LandlRight-of-Way: $0 replacement the sidewalks will also be replaced since the Construction: $1,000,000 mains are generally beneath the sidewalks. Other: $0 Total: $1,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $800,000 RateslT axes: $200,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,000,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Loan PWTF $800,000 Rates Water rates $200,000 $1,000,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 3 Justification: This project will replace a large portion of the old watermains in the downtwon area. These mains are late 1800-early 1900 construction and operate at over 120 pounds per square inch. In addition to replacement in kind, the mains along Railroad Avenue will be upgraded to provide adequate fire flow for future land uses along the waterfront. As mentioned above, an additional amount of PWTF loans are pending at the 1995 (?) logislature. Approval of these funds will allow additional lengths of watermains to be repaired. Consequences: Majority of the project is funded. Lack of proceeding with the project will ultimately result in watermain failures in the downtown area with resultant property damage and temporary loss of service. In addition, emergency repairs are more costly than planned repairs. 103 Jones Street Reservoir Cover Project #: WT -54 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves constructing a cover over the Pre-Construction: $37,018 Jones Street Reservoir to protect the water supply from third LandlRight-of-Way: $0 party contamination. Construction: $222,982 Other: $0 Total: $260,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $260,000 RateslTaxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $260,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $37,018 $222,982 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Loan Sources of Funding lPublic Works Trust Fund Legal Mandate: Yes Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 4 Justification: The construction of a cover over all reservoirs is recommended by the State Department of Health to eliminate potential risks of contamination of the water supply. Installation of the roofs will also reduce the amount of disinfection necessary at the reservoirs. Consequences: Continued exposure of potential contam ination risks. 104 ~ 'lI1 Concrete Cylinder Pipe Replacement Project #: WT-02 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves replacing the majority of the Pre-Construction: $0 concrete cylinder water pipes in the system. LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Construction: $2,000,000 Other: $0 Total: $2,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 - RateslTaxes: $2,000,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $2,000,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates IWater Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 5 Justification: The majority of the main transmission lines that the city had for water from the Morse Creek System were constructed from concrete cylinder pipe. These pipelines are now used to tie many of our reservoirs to the distribution system and over the last few years we have experienced a number of failures to the pipelines structural integrity resulting in major costs to the utility for repairs. Consequences: IVery significant risk of costly repairs to the pipelines and loss of service to our customers. 105 Cover Black Diamond Reservoir Project #: WT -59 Project Description . Estimated Project Costs I This Water project involves constructing a cover for the Pre-Construction: $70,000 reservoir to improve water quality and exposure to Land/Right-of-Way: $0 contamination. Construction: $640,000 Other: $0 Total: $710,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $710,000 . RateslTaxes: $0 Unknown: $0 Total: $710,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $710,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Loan Sources of Funding IPublic Works Trust Fund Legal Mandate: Yes Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 6 Justification: The construction of a cover over all reservoirs is recommended by the State Department of Health to eliminate potential risks of contamination of the water supply. Installation of the roofs will also reduce the amount of disinfection necessary at the reservoirs. Consequences: Continued exposure of potential contamination risks. 106 1111 Peabody St. Reservior Cover Project #: WT-31 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves constructing a cover over the Pre-Construction: $70,000 Peabody Street Reservoir to protect the water supply from LandlRight-of-Way: $0 third party contamination. Construction: $280,000 Other: $0 Total: $350,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $350,000 RateslTaxes: $0 - Unknown: $0 Total: $350,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Loan Sources of Funding lPublic Works Trust Fund Legal Mandate: Yes Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 7 Justification: The construction of a cover over all reservoirs is recommended by the State Department of Health to eliminate potential risks of contamination of the water supply. Installation of the roofs will also reduce the amount of disinfection necessary at the reservoirs. Consequences: IContinued exposure of potential contamination risks. 107 Southeast Reservoir Project #: WT -46 . Estimated Project Costs I Project Description This Water project involves constructing a new reservoir for Pre-Construction: $975,000 the high system which also serves the PUD system by Gales Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Addition. Construction: $2,275,000 Other: $0 Total: $3,250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $780,000 RateslTaxes: $2,470,000 - Unknown: $0 Total: $3,250,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $400,000 $0 $1,850,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Donation PUD contribution (may be through additional rate charge) $780,000 Rates Water Rates and Bonds $2,470,000 $3,250,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 8 Justification: This reservoir is needed to meet the additional water demands on the high system and the development occuring east ofthe city limits in the PUD service area. The project will be ajoint city and PUD project. Consequences: Restricting development in the upper system and PUD service area. 108 '111 Hydrant Replacement and New Project #: WT -13 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves installing fire hydrants in Pre-Construction: $0 accordance with current city standards. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $180,000 Other: $0 Total: $180,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $180,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $180,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $80,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates IWater Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 11 Justification: IWater hydrants are needed to provide fire protection. Consequences: IMore difficult to fight fires. 109 Inter-Tie of High Service Area Project #: WT -03 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves providing a waterline to link the Pre-Construction: $213,000 high service area across the southern portion of the city. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $557,000 Other: $0 Total: $770,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $770,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $770,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $770,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates IWater Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 12 Justification: The southeastern portion ofthe city does not have a looped water system to provide reliable pressures and flows, especially during any problems that may occur in the system. This pipeline would assist in looping the system to provide greater reliability. Consequences: Less than prefered water system reliability. 110 ~ '" Annual Replacements Project #: WT -12 . Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves replacing old water lines that are Pre-Construction: $0 in bad condition. LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Construction: $600,000 Other: $0 Total: $600,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $600,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $600,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates lWater Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 13 Justification: IThere are many miles of old water lines that are subject to failure. Consequences: IMore water line breaks. 111 ... High Zone Pipeline Project #: WT -55 Proje~t Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves the designing and construction of Pre-Construction: $85,000 a pipeline to tie the current system from Mill Creek to the new LandlRight-of-Way: $0 reservoir in the high system. Construction: $530,000 Other: $0 Total: $615,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $140,000 RateslTaxes: $475,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $615,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $85,000 $530,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Donation Contributions from PUD (could be in the form of higher rates) $140,000 Rates Water Rates $475,000 $615,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 14 Justification: This project is one of the projects necessary to add a new reservoir to the high system. It involves a pipeline from the existing reservoir to the site of the new reservoir. This pipeline and new reservoir are needed to provide the necessary water for daily needs as well as the fire flow requirements for the high system and the PUD service area to the east of the city. Consequences: ILow water flows and inadequate fire flows for the area will result. 112 ~ 11ll Elwha PS Disinfection Project #: WT -57 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves modifying the method of Pfe-Construction: $25,000 disinfection by installation of a hypochlorine system. LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Construction: $150,000 Other: $0 Total: $175,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $175,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $175,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $175,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates IWater Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 15 Justification: This project is a part of the change over for the method of disinfection used at all of our sites. The conversion is away from chlorine gas to a hypochlorine system. This system eliminates the need to use chlorine gas. The conversion of the existing physical areas where we use the chlorine gas to an acceptable system is as costly as the conversion to the hypochlorine system but the hypochlorine system is safer to the environment and our employees. Most of our reservoirs are located in residential areas and we want to eliminate as many risks to our operation as possible. Consequences: IContinued use of the old chlorine gas system and its operational problems. 113 Black Diamond Reservoir Disinfection Project #: WT -52 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves modifying the method of Pre-Construction: $20,000 disinfection for the reservoir by installing a h;ypochlorine LandlRight-of-Way: $0 system. Construction: $100,000 Other: $0 Total: $120,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslT axes: $120,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $120,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Sources of Funding Rates I Water Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 16 Justification: This project is a part of the change over for the method of disinfection used at all of our sites. The conversion is away from chlorine gas to a hypochlorine system. This system eliminates the need to use chlorine gas. The conversion of the existing physical areas where we use the chlorine gas to an acceptable system is as costly as the conversion to the hypochlorine system but the hypochlorine system is safer to the environment and our employees. Most of our reservoirs are located in residential areas and we want to eliminate as many risks to our operation as possible. Consequences: Continued use of the old chlorine gas system and its operational problems. 114 ~ irn Corrosion Control Facility Project #: WT -32 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves constructing a water treatment Pre-Construction: $80,000 facility to adjust the ph of water so as to reduce the copper LandlRight-of-Way: $0 content of the water and reduce its corrosiveness. Construction: $300,000 Other: $0 Total: $380,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 - RateslTaxes: $380,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $380,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 W W W W W W First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates IWater Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 17 Justification: We are required by the State to bring copper levels within standards and reduce the corrosiveness of the existing water supply. Consequences: IFailure to meet safe water standards and more water line failures. 115 Spruce Street Fire Pump Project #: WT -56 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves providing water booster pumping Pre-Construction: $10,000 capacity to meet fire flow needs at Spruce and Fairmont. LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Construction: $65,000 Other: $0 Total: $75,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 - RateslTaxes: $75,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $75,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates IWater Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 18 Justification: The Spruce and Fairmont areas are currently serviced by a booster pump. There is only one pumping system in place with no backup available. When the pumps fail the entire area loses pressure and fire flows are not available. This project will provide the backup and reliability necessary. Consequences: Lack of reliable domestic and fire flows. 116 - McDougal Subzone Fire pump Project #: WT -64 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Water project involves constructing water booster Pre-Construction: $10,000 pumping capacity to meet fire flows for this small area. LandlRight-of-Way: $0 Construction: $65,000 Other: $0 Total: $75,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateSITaxes: $75,000 - Unknown: $0 Total: $75,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates IWater Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 19 Justification: This small area of the system meets daily requirements but cannot meet the fire flow requirements. Therefore. a booster pump is needed to assist in the supply of adequate flows for fire fighting. Consequences: ILess than desirable fire flows for the area. 117 Golf Course Road Water PRY's Project #: WT-Ol Project Description Estimated Project Costs I This Water project involves installing two additional pressure Pre-Construction: $0 relief valves to separate the pressure zones ofthe water system LandlRight-of-Way: $0 and improve service. Construction: $100,000 Other: $0 Total: $100,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $100,000 RateslTaxes: $0 . Unknown: $0 Total: $100,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Donation IDeveloper Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Water Department Priority: 20 Justification: The water service in the Golf Course Road area will need to have the pressure zones adjusted to improve service and allow for development of Del Guzzi Drive properties. Consequences: ISame service as is currently. 118 .", Sewer Pump Stations 1 & 3 Improvements Project #: WW-25 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Wastewater project involves eliminating sewer pump Pre-Construction: $130,000 station # 1 with the construction of a gravity main to pump Land/Right-of-Way: $70,000 station #3 and will upgrade pump station #3 to add additional Construction: $400,000 capacity. Other: $0 Total: $600,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $600,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $600,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Sources of Funding Rates IWastewater Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Wastewater Department Priority: Justification: Sewer pump station #1 is nearing its capacity and will need to be enlarged. In lieu of modifications to the pump station, it is proposed to eliminate the station. The station is located in a residential front yard and does cause some odor problems and flooding damage at times even with an overflow valve installed. With the abandonment of the station a tight line would be constructed to pump station #3 after it is modified to increase its capacity. . Consequences: IEventual restriction of growth in the area served by these stations. 119 Golf Course Road Sewer Interceptor Project #: WW-05 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Wastewater project involves extending the sewer main PIll-Construction: $120,000 from the Penn StreetfFirst Street area directly to the WWTP to Land/Right-of-Way: $20,000 provide additional capacity and service to the new areas to the Construction: $860,000 south. Other: $0 Total: $1,000,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $1,000,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,000,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates I Wastewater Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Wastewater Department Priority: 2 Justification: The area south of Melody Lane and Lindberg Road along Golf Course Road will not be able to be fully served by the existing sewer line that serves the area. An additional line is needed to provide the capacity. This line would also provide some releiffor the sewer lines in Georgiana Street which is ultimately where this areas flow goes. The new line would provide a more direct route to the WWTP. Consequences: The sewer line will not meet the needs of the growth in the area and restrictions on growth would be necessary . 120 - Laurel Street Outfall Extension Project #: WW-04 . Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Wastewater project involves extending the Laurel Street Pre-Construction: $10,000 combined sewer overflow outfall into deeper water farther LandlRight-of-Way: $0 from the shoreline. Construction: $140,000 Other: $0 Total: $150,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $150,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $150,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates IWastewater Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Wastewater Department Priority: 3 Justification: The existing outfall is located close to the shoreline. When a CSO occurs it is visible from the shore. In addition, the outfall is in need of repair. This repair would be completed at the same time as the extension. Consequences: IContinued use of the existing facility. 121 ". Oak Street Outfall Extension Project #: WW-06 Proje,ct Description Estimated Project Costs I This Wastewater project involves replacing the damaged pipe Pre-Construction: $10,000 and extending the outfall into deeper water of the harbor. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $190,000 Other: $0 Total: $200,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslT axes: $200,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $200,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 W W W W W ~OO~ First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates lWastewater Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Wastewater Department Priority: 4 Justification: The existing outfall is located close to the shoreline. When a CSO occurs it is visible from the shore. In addition, the outfall is in need of repair. This repair would be completed at the same time as the extension. Consequences: IContinued use of the existing facility. 122 "" Baker St. Interceptor Project #: WW-20 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Waste Water project involves constructing a sewer PIe-Construction: $100,000 interceptor to serve the east side of the city and GMA area. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $2,400,000 Other: $0 Total: $2,500,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $2,500,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $2,500,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Rates Sources of Funding IWaste Water Rates I $2,500,000 $2,500,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Waste Water Department Priority: 5 Justification: IExisting facilities do not have capacity to serve the GMA area to the east. Consequences: IRestricted growth and limited development. 123 Lincoln Street Storm Drain Project #: DR-04 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Storm water project involves installing a storm drain in PIll-Construction: $50,000 Lincoln Street from 4th Street to 13th Street that will allow Land/Right-of-Way: $0 the separation of storm water from the sanitary sewer. Construction: $450,000 Other: $0 Total: $500,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $500,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $500,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Sources of Funding Rates I Storm Water Fees Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: Yes Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Stormwater Department Priority: Justification: Lincoln Street does not have a separated storm drain and sanitary sewer system between 8th and 4th Streets and the system above 8th Street is undersized for the flows. Construction of this project will aid in the reduction of combined sewer overflows at 2nd and Lincoln. Consequences: IContinued combined sewer overflows. 124 City-Wide Catch Basin Modifications Project #: DR-02 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Stormwater project involves replacing existing catch P.e-Construction: $20,000 basins and inlets with more efficient inlets in problem areas. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $230,000 Other: $0 Total: $250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 - RateslTaxes: $250,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $250,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates lStorm Water Fees Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Storm water Department Priority: 2 Justification: The existing catch basins in many locations arc at the center of the curve in a corner. In many of these locations they are also depressed which can cause some vehicle ride problems when turning the corner. The location at the center of the cur\'c is not an efficient location or method of capturing stormwater. In some cases the stormwater runs across the intersections which is not recommended. Consequences: IContinued use of old system. 125 ~.,-".- - Stormwater Discharges Over Bluff Project #: DR-53 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Storm water project involves improving the storm Pre-Construction: $50,000 discharge over the bluff to the Straits. Work includes LandlRight-of-Way: $0 additional discharge at 10th, "P" Street, "N" Street, and Construction: $350,000 McDonald Street. Other: $0 Total: $400,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 - RateslTaxes: $400,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $400,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $100,000 $100,000 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates lStorm Water Fees Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Storm water Department Priority: 3 Justification: The current discharge of stormwater over the bluff at this location needs to be improved to increase the size of the discharge and eliminate erosion at the base of the bluff caused by the discharge of the water. Consequences: Continued flooding upstream and erosion at the base of the bluff. 12fi 1111 Peabody CreeklLincoln St Culvert Rehab Project #: DR-14 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Storm water project involves repairing and rehabilitating Pre-Construction: $40,000 the existing culvert under Lincoln Street. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $300,000 Other: $0 Total: $340,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $100,000 RateslTaxes: $240,000 - Unknown: $0 Total: $340,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $340,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Grant WDDOT $100,000 Rates Storm Water Fees $240,000 $340,000 Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Storm water Department Priority: 4 Justification: This project would repair the failing condition ofthe large culvert under Lincoln Street which carries Peabody Creek. The bottom of the pipe in many portions of its length have failed. The bricks that lined the bottom of the pipe have been removed by the flow of the stream. Cracks are beginning to show up on the walls of the pipe indicating that the pipe is losing its strength. Consequences: In the long term failure to fund this project will result in the failure of the culvert and the loss of Lincoln Street as a traveled roadway with a high potential for property damage. 127 10th And "N" Street Regional Storm Detention Project #: DR-65 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Stormwater project involves constructing a regional Pre-Construction: $50,000 storm water detention system for the west end. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $200,000 Other: $0 Total: $250,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesITaxes: $250,000 - Unknown: $0 Total: $250,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates IStorm Water Fees Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Stormwater Department Priority: 5 J ustificat;on: The development in the west end of the city has occured slowly over time. This development has been spotty making the design and construction of a regional stonnwater system very difficult to coordinate. In order for the west end to develop fully in line with the Compo Plan, a regional stonnwater system should be constructed to address storm water runoff in accordance with the state standards. Consequences: IReduced development and potential short term flooding of property. 128 '" Milwaukee Dr. Stormwater Improvements Project #: DR-03 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Storm water project involves providing storm water P,'e-Construction: $100,000 improvements in the Milwaukee Drive area. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $950,000 Other: $0 Total: $1,050,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslT axes: $1,050,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,050,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,050,000 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I $1,050,000 $1,050,000 Rates . IStorm Water Fees Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Stormwater Department Priority: 6 Justification: The west end of the city is developing in a spotty pattern which results in a case by case design of the stormwater systems for the area. It is important to design and construct a well coordinated storm water system that will address the full future development needs of the area. Consequences: IContinued flooding during heavy rains. 129 Landfill Cell #2 Extension Project #: SW -32 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Public Works & Utilities project will extend the life of Pre-Construction: $0 cell #2. Land/Right-of-Way: $0 Construction: $1,200,000 Other: $0 Total: $1,200,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $1,200,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,200,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates ISolid Waste Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Solid Waste Department Priority: Justification: Utilizing the existing landfill for as long as possible is by far the least expensive option for disposal of solid waste. Consequences: ILong hauling must start sooner. 130 Landfill Transfer Station Project #: SW-31 . Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Solid Waste project involves the construction of a Pre-Construction: $150,000 transfer station at the landfill to accomodate longhauling of Land/Right-of-Way: $0 solid waste once the landfill is closed. Construction: $1,350,000 Other: $0 Total: $1,500,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RateslTaxes: $1,500,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $1,500,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates ISolid Waste Rates Legal Mandate: Yes Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Solid Waste Department Priority: 2 Justification: Constructing a transfer station at the landfill is the least expensive option for disposal of solid waste once the landfill is closed. Consequences: IMore expensive transfer station built elsewhere. 131 Landfill Closure Project #: SW-35 Proj~ct Description Estimated Project Costs This Solid Waste project involves closing the City's landfill Pre-Construction: $150,000 once we are no longer able to dispose of solid waste because Land/Right-of-Way: $0 of the requirements of the FAA. Construction: $2,050,000 Other: $0 Total: $2,200,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesITaxes: $2,200,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $2,200,000 Yearly Expense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $0 $0 $2,200,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates ISo1id Waste Rates Legal Mandate: Yes Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Solid Waste Department Priority: 3 Justification: The FAA is requiring us to close the landfill because of its proximity to the airport and the potential for bird/airplane incidents. Consequences: IViolation of law. 132 Container Conversion Project #: SW-Ol Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Solid Waste project involves the conversion of the P,'e-Construction: $0 existing 300 gallon residential containers to 60 or 90 gallon Land/Right-of-Way: $0 individual containers. Construction: $0 Other: $300,000 Total: $300,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $0 RatesIT axes: $300,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $300,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $75,000 $100,000 $125,000 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding Rates ISolid Waste Rates Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Solid Waste Department Priority: 4 Justification: The conversion of all of the 300 gallon containers to individual containers would be accomplished by a change in the collection schedule to every other week rather than every week. The advantage of each individual having their own container is that they more directly control how and what they are charged for refuse collection. Consequences: IContinue current level of service. 133 Well Construction Project #: SW-33 Project Description Estimated Project Costs This Solid Waste project involves installing an additional Pre-Construction: $0 groundwater monitoring well as required by our landfill LandlRight-of-Way: $0 permit. Construction: $30,000 Other: $0 Total: $30,000 Estimated Project Funding Fund Transfer: $0 Donations/Grants/Loans: $24,000 RateslTaxes: $6,000 Unknown: $0 Total: $30,000 Yearly Expense Summary - Capital/Net Operating Prior Years 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0 Total Sources of Funding I Grant CDG Grant $24,000 Rates Solid Waste Rates $6,000 $30,000 Legal Mandate: Yes Concurrency: No Contract: No Department: Public Works & Utilities Department Contact: Jack Pittis Division: Solid Waste Department Priority: 5 J ustificat;on: IPermit requirement. Consequences: IViolation of permit. 134 ~ ....