Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout29-90 e e RESOLUTION NO. 29-90 A RESOLUTION of the city of Port Angeles establishing a multi-year strategy for implementing the Growth Management Act of 1990 and allocating financial assistance monies provided by the state of Washington for mandated planning activities from July l, 1990, to June 30, 1991. WHEREAS, the State of Washington has enacted Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2929, known as the Growth Management Act of 1990, mandating comprehensive planning by city and county governments consistent with the Act; and WHEREAS, the State of washington has provided financial assistance to jurisdictions mandated or opting to comply with all provisions of the Act; and WHEREAS, a grant program has been developed and will be administered by the washington state Department of Community Development; and WHEREAS, an allocation of grant funds to implement first year Growth Management Act planning activities for the Clallam county area has been made in the amount of $156,329; and WHEREAS, these funds will be released by the state of Washington to the cities of Port Angelesr Forks, and Sequimr and Clallam County upon completion of a multi-year regional strategy agreed to by a majority of these jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the city of Port Angeles wants to promote orderly and environmentally sensitive growth; and WHEREAS, Clallam County and the cities of Sequim, Forks, and Port Angeles have endeavored to work cooperatively to implement the Growth Management Act of 1990; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city of Port ~ngeles as follows: -1- e . section 1. The city of Port Angeles agrees to implement the multi-year regional strategy attached as Exhibit "A". section 2. The multi-year regional strategy for implementing the Growth Management Act of 1990 will be re- evaluated annually, or as necessary by Initiative 547, and may be amended by the same process and Washington state Department of Community Development requirements under which this agreement was reached. section 3. Funds distributed on a quarterly basis by ~he Washington state Department of Community Development to the City of Port Angeles will be delivered forthwith to Clallam County, Sequim, and Forks in the following proportions for the period from July l, 1990, to June 30, 1991: Clallam County $ 65,100 City of Port Angeles $ 44r8OO City of Sequim $ 23,600 City of Forks $ 22r829 section 4. The Planning Director of the city of Port Angeles will act as the contact and fiscal agent to the Washington state Department of Community Development on behalf of Clallam County and the Cities of Forks, Sequim, and Port Angeles. -2- e e PASSED by the city Council of the City of Port Angeles October, 1990. at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 16th day of PUBLISHED: N/A """'I"I"':"'I,:,\y.",u... ~"'''tr ...~... - ":" r.... "'''; :\::' ":\ ~ ... r "' )";, If;;:.", \. ..0-'-. / . 'l .;'~,-:<390 ..-......./:~ ~~_-.... _~ -_.i::-' ~ "'-.... :-:-; .J . -- '": ~ '" -.' .' - . -... .. '/ 1:-........... A-"-' .....: ......... .~ f/...... ........,....-.-.7\+......:.. -~,.I"II . '\.' ...~...y~ \,"\~ 6,.,-,. .....n...."'""~..."'"" -3- ct'M" h ~cid- I e Exhibit A CLALLAM COUNTY REGIONAL GROWIH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Introduction PutpOse: This is the strategy through which Clallam County and the cities within the county-- Port Angeles, forks and Sequim, will work towards providing orderly, coordinated management of growth as intended by the legislature in its enactment of Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2929. This strategy will set the framework for working together, not specific steps that must be accomplished. Overall Plannin~ Strategy: The county, cities, and special purpose districts in Clallam County have not often worked together on coordinated planning problems, except in the areas of water quality, solid waste and economic development. The overall regional growth management strategy, therefore, must frrst focus on how, and on what issues, general and special purpose governments within Clallam County can work together. Planning issues do not always affect the region as a whole; sometimes they only affect a smaller sub- region or just a local area. Regional issues affect aU jurisdictions, tribes and most special purpose districts throughout the county and further. Subregional issues most often would affect the county and one city or urban center, plus affected tribes and special purpose districts. Local issues principally affects only one general purpose government-.city or county, and, as appropriate, special purpose districts and tribes. Some issues affect one or more levels of regional concern. For example, housing is a regional issue, but ways to preserve existing neighborhoods is strictly a local concern. The following issues, and which forum they should be addressed in, have been identified through development of this strategy: Regional Issues State Highway Planning State Facilities--colleges, prisons, offices Solid Waste Utilities--electric, telephone Intergovernmental Coope ration Sub-Regional Transportation--arterials Urban Growth Area Designations Resource Land Designations Capital Facilities Plansnrecreation, water, sewer, storm water Housing--Iow & moderate income Open Space Land Use--urban growth area Public Services Page 1 Oallam County Growth Managemenl Slralegy Local I Land Use Housing..ncighborhood preservation Transportation..local streets Rural Element Capital Facilities Public Services Critical Areas Optional Elements Governmental Framework The existing governmental framework will be used, supplemented with interlocal agreements and/or memorandum's of understanding and joint citizen task force/planning commission review of particular elements to meet the requirements of ESHB 29'19. The existing governmental framework consists of three city councils, tbe board of county commissioners and their respective planning commissions. Regional Approach to Planning Elements Urban Growth Areas: Urban growth areas have been identified as a sub-regional issue, affecting all three cities, other urban centers (Clallam Bay/Sekiu, Carlsborg, Joyce) and the county. The cities will take lead responsibility for staff work and urban growth area proposals; the county is responsible for unincorporated urban centers. The lead planning agency will develop a work plan and staffing plan, in cooperation witb the county. Citizen task forces will be jointly appointed by the county and each city to propose urban growth areas. The task force and lead planning agency will consider 2O-year population forecast of OFM, service availability and other boundary criteria, which will be developed. The cities, and the county for unincorporated urban centers, will propose urban growth area areas by July 1,1991. Lead Responsibility: Target Dates: Work Plan: Task Force: Report: City Proposal: City/County: Each city (county for some urban centers) Adopted by December 1, 1990 . Appoint by January 1, 1991 Task Force Report by May 1, 1991 July 1, 1991 Begin review process July 1, 1991; review need for interim development regulations; adopt as necessary Transportation: Transportation has been identified as a planning issue that affects all three levels of the region. Highway 101 and 112 are state highways which provide commerce routes to the region. At the same time, these highways are principal arterials for local traffic. The bottleneck at Sequim, and the state highway through Port Angeles, are examples of how the region and local government must address the transportation element. e The county and cities have not addressed cooperative transportation planning in the past. The need for coordinated road planning seems most obvious in the growing urban center around Sequim, but is equally important in the other cities and urban centers. Page 2 Oallam County Growth Management Strategy ESHB 1929 authorizes the formation of Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPO's). The criteria for designation of an RTPO is that it must encompass at least one complete county; have a population of at least 100,000, or contain a minimum of three counties; and have as members all counties within the region, and at least 60% of the cities within the region representing a minimum of 75% of the cities' population. I In order for Clallam County to form an RTPO under these criteria. at least two other counties must be part of the agreement. It is logical to include Jefferson County; the other potential members would include Kitsap, Mason and Grays Harbor counties. The county and cities will explore interest in formation of an RTPO under the authority of ESHB 2929. If an RTPO is not logical or feasible, the county and cities will explore other means to address state highway issues, in coordination with the Department of Transportation. On a sub-region leve~ the county and each respective city will address arterial plans cooperatively, particularly in the urban growth area. The city will be the lead planning agency for this requirement. Lead Responsibility: RTPO: Arterials: Local Roads: Clallam County Each city for urban growth areas; county for rural areas and unincorporated urban centers Each respective jurisdiction Target Dates: RTPO: Arterials: Loca1 Roads: Feasibility by December 1, 1990 Work plan by March I, 1991; begin process by July I, 1991; complete by July 1,1992 Complete by July 1,1993 Resource Lands: Resource lands have been identified as an issue that affects the sub-region, although the intent of ESHB 2929 appears to protect resource lands principally outside urban areas. The county will take the lead responsibility in identification of resource lands. A joint citizen task force will be appointed by the city and county. Lead Responsibility: Target Dates: Clallam County Work plan by February 1, 1991; inventory by May, 1991; task force recommendation by July 1,1991; interim regulations adopted by September 1, 1991 Critical Areas: Although certain critical areas. such as aquifer recharge areas and wildlife habitat, may be sub-regional issues, wetlands and specific habitat areas, and the degree to which protection may be desired, are local issues. Therefore, critical areas will be addressed by each jurisdiction individually but coordinated on the sub-region level. However, in order to efficiently utilize resources and educate the public, Clallam County, on behalf of aU jurisdictions, will apply for a wetland protection grant from the Department of Ecology to address public education, individual wetland strategies and ordinances. Lead Responsibility: Target Dates: Each jurisdiction Designations or definitions by July 1, 1991; interim regulations adopted by September 1, 1991 e Page 3 Oallam County Growth Management Strategy CaDital Facilities Planning: Capital facilities planning has been identified as all issue affecting the sub-region level. There arc special purpose districts with capital facility planning authority, such as the Port of Port Angeles and the Public Utility District. In development of sub-region and local comprehensive plans, close coordination \\lith these independent governments must be sought. Each local government, in preparation of the comprehensive plans. will be responsible for inventory and planning of capital facilities. However, where capital facilities are planned for urban growth areas, the city will have lead responsibility in cooperation with the county. I Lead Responsibility: Target Dates: Each jurisdiction/Cities for Urban Growth Area Work plan by July, 1991 Inventory by July, 1992 Plan by July. 1993 Implementation by July. 1994 Comprehensive Plans: The comprehensive plans required by ESHB 2929 must be adopted individually by each jurisdiction, in coordination.with each other. The most critical area where coordination must be addressed is the urban growth area--the area between present city boundaries and the projected urban growth boundary. Urban growth areas are proposed based on 2O-year population projections. It is not feasible to assume tbat cities will annex or be able to provide services to this growth area immediately upon adoption of tbe growth area. Property owners, however, may be interested in development of their property within these areas. It is critical to reach agreement between the city and county on planning for these areas. Consistent standards and/or jointly adopted land use plans, interloc.al agreements or memorandums of understanding should be developed for these areas. The following issues will be addressed jointly between the cities and county for the urban growth area: transportation (arterials), urban growth boundary, capital facility plans, housing for low and moderate income, open space and recreation, public services, and land use designations. In order to cooperatively plan for these areas, the county and each respective city must understand the process and method by which they will plan these areas. The first step, therefore, would be to reach an agreement on the planning approach and method. How these plans will be implemented cannot be determined until these agreements are reached. Lead Responsibility: Target Dates: Each jurisdiction/to be determined Memorandum of Understanding's between each city and the county on planning approach by July 1, 1991. Implementation of planning approach July, 1991 through July, 1993. Housinl!:: This issue is recognized as affecting the region as a whole. the sub-regions, and individual jurisdictions. Close coordination and joint planning will be accomplished. Eaclljurisdiction will be responsible for development of their housing plans; ways to coordinate and streamline the tasks will be developed at a later date. Lead Responsibility: Target Dates: Each jurisdiction Begin by July I, 1991 e Page 4 I e OaJlam County Growth Managemenl Slralegy Glossary of Planning Terms "Natural Resource lands" includes agricultural, forest and mineral resource lands. "Critical areas" include the following areas and ecosystems: (a) Wetlands; (b) areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers used for potable water; (c) fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas; (d) frequently flooded areas; and (e) geologically hazardous areas. "Agricultural land" means land primarily devoted to commercial production of horticultural, viticultural, floricultural, dairy, apiary, vegetable, or animal products or of berries, grain, hay, straw, turf, seed, Christmas trees, or livestock, and that bas long-term commercial significance for agricultural production. "Forest land" means land primarily useful for growing trees, including Christmas trees for commercial purposes. and that has long-term commercial significance for growing trees commercially. "Minerals" include grave~ sand, and valuable metallic substances. "Urban growth" refers to growth that makes intensive use of land for the location of buildings, etc. to such a degree as to be incompatible with the production of food, agriculture or extraction of mineral resources. Urban growth typically requires urban governmental services. "Capital Facilities" includes water, sewer, storm water, transportation systems, parks, government buildings and other facilities provided by public agencies. Page 5