HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 05/19/2004
.
.
.
~f '0'"" R~r' ~'PJ.N.G(.~ 'E' 'L- E' IS' J
','! I , Ii! " ,]
_~j ,,' /1, 1)'1. J I ,i
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
321 East Fifth Street
May 19,2004
6 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Ill. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
IV. PUBLIC MEETING:
1.
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - GREEN CROW - Rook Road: Proposal fora 43-unit
subdivision in the RS-9, Residential Single Family zone.
2. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND
LAND USE MAP - CPA 04-02 - CITY OF PORT ANGELES: City wide
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map.
V. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
VI. STAFF REPORTS
VII. REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Fred H~wins (Chair),len Rasmussen (Vice Chair), ChUiX Schramm, Fred Norton, Iinda Nutter, Bob Philpott, D)lan Honnold
PLANNING STAFF: Brad Collins, Diro.:tor; Scott Johns, Associate Planner; Sue RobErds, Assistant Planner.
.
.
.
MINUTES
Special Meeting
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
May 19, 2004
6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Fred Hewins, Fred Norton, Leonard Rasmussen, Dylan
Honnold
Members Excused:
Bob Philpott, Linda Nutter, Chuck Schramm
Staff Present:
Brad Collins, Scott Johns, Sue Roberds, Jim Mahlum
Public Present:
Steve Zenovic, Dennis Yakovich, Jeff Bohman, Brian Gawley
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes from the May 12, 2004 meeting were placed on the dias before the meeting.
Commissioner Norton moved to continue approval of the minutes to the next Planning
Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Honnold and passed 4-0.
PUBLIC MEETING:
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - GREEN CROW - Rook Drive: Proposal for
a 43-unit subdivision in the RS-9, Residential Single Family zone. Decision
continued from the May 12, 2004 meeting.
Director Collins stated that staff had met with the applicants and Clallam County Roads staff
regarding the issue ofMt. Angeles Road. Based on the fact that Mt. Angeles Road is located in the
UGA, City standards should apply. Mt. Angeles Road currently meets paved surface standard, but
not the ditch and pedestrian walkway standards. The applicant requested that right-of-way be 50 feet
in width, however City Engineer Jim Mahlum indicated that the standard is 60 feet and that the City
cannot negotiate that width. It was also indicated by Mr. Mahlum that sight distance at the
intersection of Rook Drive and Mt. Angeles Road met the standard requirements for the posted speed
limit.
Director Collins indicated that the City is comfortable with the proposed park area being
developed in the second phase of the development. Specific details of the park could not be
presented at this time as parking requirements would be based on final size and design of the park.
The park will be linked by a pedestrian walking path that meets City standards from Campbell
Avenue to Rook Drive, which will also act as the required pedestrian link that would not be added
to Mt. Angeles Road. In response to a question from Commissioner Rasmussen, Director Collins
stated that the preliminary site preparation and grading of the park area would be done by the
applicant and that final improvements would be completed by the City Parks Department.
Director Collins stated that an agreement had been reached that Rook Drive would be
extended to Wabash during the first phase of the project, however the initial construction would be
.
.
.
Planning COlli mission Minules
May 19, 2004
Page 13
Item 63. New Economic Development Element Objective C.l. The Commission voted 4 -
o to recommend denial ofthis amendment, stating a lack of specificity about a skate park and the fact
that the City has studied the need for a skate board park and determined that a need exists and a
location has been designated.
Item 64. New Economic Development Element Goal D. The Commission voted 3 - 1 to
recommend approval. Commissioner Rasmussen voted no, stating that it should be up to the
Downtown Association to promote these concepts without City interference.
Item 65. New Economic Development Element Objective D.l. The Commission
recommended denial of this amendment on a 2 - 2 vote, stating that incentive programs tended to
be give-away programs and it is not the taxpayers job to provide incentives. Commissioner
Rasmussen pointed out that improvements in the downtown area are taking place currently without
incentives. Commissioner Philpott's written comments indicated support.
Item 66. New Economic Development Element Objective D.2. The Commission
recommended denial of this amendment on a 2 - 2 vote, stating that the amendment is redundant and
unnecessary.
Item 67. New Economic development Element Objective D.3. Discussion provided
clarification of the proposal. The Commission voted 4 - 0 to recommend approval.
Item 68. New Economic Development Element Objective D.4. The Commission
recommended denial of this amendment 3 - 1, indicating that the City is highly involved in this
project and therefor the amendment was redundant and unnecessary. The Commissioners indicated
that this vote against this specific amendment did not indicate that the Commission is not in support
of the Gateway project.
Commissioner Hewins commented that he had participated in the public process and indicated that
he was pleased by the level of public involvement, the staff s efforts in organization and preparation,
and the support shown by the Peninsula Daily News.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None
STAFF REPORTS
There is a full very full agenda at the June 1,2004 City Council meeting. The Comprehensive Plan
will not be acted upon by City Council until Monday, June 14, 2004. The City Council meeting is
moved up from Tuesday to Monday due to the Association of Washington Cities meeting schedule
conflict.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Mimltes
May 19, 2004
Page J 4
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
None
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
k~~
Brad Collins, Secretary
PREPARED BY: S. Johns
~~
Fred Hewins, Chair
,
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U.s. A.
PLAl\1NING CO:Ml\1ISSION ATTENDANCE ROSTER
AND TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEET
PLEASE SIGN IN
Meeting Agenda of:
I11rj /1) dlVi
.
To help us provide an accurate record of those in attendance, please sign in. Your
signature acknowledges your presence. If you plan to testify, by your signature below, you
certify that the testimony given is true and correct under penalty of perjury by the lows of the
State of Washington. Signature below DOES NOT REQUIRE you to testify.
NAME:
ADDRESS:
Agenda Item No.
l
.2
C: \M Y Files\Forms \Mtgrostpc. wpd