HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/19/1987
.
.
.
//-/9 -j/?
AGENDA
PORT ANGELES PLANNING CDMMISSION
- -
321 EAST FIFTH STREET
PORT -ANGELES-;--WASHINGTON--- .98362
7:00 P.M.
I.
CALL TO ORDER
II.
ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Meeting of October 28, 1987
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. EXTENSION REQUEST, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CUP 85(07)3 -
SOVDE, 1511 West Sixteenth Street: Request for extension of
a Conditional Use Permit allowing a duplex to be located in
the RS-7, Single-Family Residential, District. (This item
is continued from the October 14, 1987 Meeting).
2. STREET VACATION REQUEST - STV 87(9)6 - CRONAUER, A
portion of the 3/4 Alley and 4th Street, abutting Block 75,
TPA. Request to vacate a portion of 4th Street and the
~Alley east of the Tumwater Truck Route, extending up
the hill to Cedar Street.
3. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT REQUEST - SMA 87(11)85 -
JAMES RIVER, Ediz Hook: Request for a Shoreline Permit to
allow construction of a new computer room/building.
4. REZONE REQUEST - RZ 87(11}2 - PRESSLEY - 1017 W. 17th:
Request for rezone of property presently designated RS-7,
~ing~~-Y<!-mi:!.Y: Resident ial, to RMf--'.~ I3E?si~en!ial Multi-Family.
- --~- -- -- -- - - "- ,
.
5. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT REQUEST SMA 87(11)86,
PORT OF PORT ANGELES, Foot of Tumwater Street: Request for
a Shoreline Permit to allow expansion of the Port's present
booming grounds.
6. REZONE REQUEST - RZ 87(11)3 - SWENSON - 500 Block of
East Vine Street: Request to rezone property located at the
southeast corner of the intersection of East Seventh and
and Vine Streets, approximately 7,000 square feet, from
RMF, Residential Multi-Family, to CSD-Cl, Community Shopping
District. ,--- - .- -" -~--.-
V. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
VI. STAFF REPORTS
VII. REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
. November 19, 1987
.
.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Lemon called the meeting to order at 5:30 P.M.
(This meeting is a continuation of the November 18th meeting. )
II. ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Michael Lemon, Ted Puckett, Jim Hulett,
Donna Davison-Ness and Richard Wight
Members Absent:
Jerry Glass and Bob Philpott
Staff Present:
Paul D. Carr and Otto Miller
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT REQUEST
PORT OF PORT ANGELES, Location:
Request for a Shoreline Permit to
of the Port's present boom grounds.
SMA 87 ( 11 ) 86
Ed iz Hook.
allow expansion
Otto Miller reviewed the staff report.
opened the public hearing.
Chairman Lemon
Ken Sweeney said the Port would prefer not to have the
five-year maximum limitation on the shoreline permit as
condi t ioned in the staff report. The current boom grounds
are frequently full. The Port no longer sorts logs at
the airport. A certain volume of logs go through the water
at present and if the Port is not granted the shoreline
permit, the logs have to be moved quicker.
Chairman Lemon closed the public hearing.
Ted Puckett recommended
affect ~he water quality.
denial because the proposal would
Motion died for lack of a second.
Jim Hulett recommended approval of the permit with the
following conditions:
1. The proposal for two three-pile dolphins and boom sticks
shall be temporary. Therefore, the dolphins and boom st icks
shall be removed within five years after approval of this
permit or within one year after the removal of the gravel
bar at the mouth of Tumwater Creek, whichever comes first.
2.
All necessary permits shall be obtained from the City
.
.
.
Planning Commission
November 19, 1987
Page 2
of Port Angeles. The applicant shall comply with the terms
indicated by this permit I unless more restrictive conditions
are required by other Federal or State permits.
3. The permitee shall permit the City or its representatives
or designees to make periodic inspect ions at any reasonable
time deemed necessary in order to ensure that the activity
being performed under the authority of this permit is in
accordance with the terms and conditions prescribed herein;
and citing the following findings:
A. Provided the two proposed three-pile dolphins and
boom sticks are temporary as permitted by the Shoreline
Substantial Development Permit, the use can be consistent
with General regulation C.1 and C.2 and Natural Systems
E.5.
B. Significant adverse
proposal can be mitigated to
incorporated in this permit
permits.
impacts associated with this
insignificant levels by measures
and other required regulatory
C. The two three-pile dolphins
ditioned should not significantly
public activities.
and boom sticks as con-
affect Harbor use and
Dick Wight seconded
Puckett voting "nay"
water quality.
the motion which passed 4-1 with
because the proposal will affect
Ted
the
REZONE REQUEST RZ 87(11)3 SWENSON, 500 Block
of East Vine Street: Request to rezone property
located at the southeast corner of the intersection
of East Seventh and Vine Streets, approximately
7,OOOsquare feet, from RMF, Residential Multi-Family,
to CSD-C1, Community Shopping District.
Otto Miller reviewed the staff report.
opened the public hearing.
Chairman Lemon
Vern Swenson, applicant I explained that he currently occupies
a leased building and would like to build a 1000 square
foot dental office on East Seventh Street. He feels his
proposal would enhance the area, beautify a vacant lot,
and 15 out of 26 medical people are located on Eighth Street.
Mr. Swenson said he had looked at other commercial sites
but found them unsuitable I and more costly. He presented
a petition supporting the rezone request.
Chairman Lemon closed the public hearing.
.
.
.
Planning Commission
November 19, 1987
Page 3
Dick Wight recommended denial of the rezone request citing
the following findings:
1. The proposed CSD-Cl, Community Shopping District, is
not as functionally related or similar to surrounding uses
and zones as the present RMF designation and therefore,
the proposed intermingling of incompatible uses does not
comply as closely with Land Use Objective Nos. 2 and 7.
2. The rezone is a commercial intrusion into an established
residential area and an expansion of an existing commercial
strip which does not conform to Commercial Policies Nos.
2 and 4.
3. Since there is ample available commercially-zoned land,
new professional off ices would more appropriately be located
in an existing commercial district.
4. Given the small size of the subject property, its location
acoss the alley boundary and the directly abutt ing residen-
tially-zoned lots, the proposed rezone lot would not be
able to adequately buffer the incompat ible impact sand
thus cannot comply with Commercial Policy No.3.
5. The property, as presently zoned, complies with Residential
Policies Nos. 15 and 16 of the Comprehensive Plan.
6. There have not been any changes in the area since the
initial zoning to RMF. Also, as determined through an
evaluation by the Commission last year, the Lincoln Street
commercial district is where commercial expansion could
occur in the City and be consistent with the City's Comprehsive
Plan. Thus, there are not changed circumstances.
Donna Davison-Ness seconded the motion which passed 5-0.
Dick Wight left the meeting room.
v.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Leonard Beil, representing the Clallam County Fairboard,
explained that they have a mobile home which they wish
to use for storage at the fairgrounds, however, mobile
homes are only permitted in the Mobile Home Park District
of the City. He explained how they acquired the used mobile
home, and that it did not have the current tagging required
by the Department of Labor and Industries. He stated that
they intended to modify the interior of the mobile home,
insulating the bathroom and using portions of it for storage
of paint.
.
.
.
Planning Commission
November 19, 1987
Page 4
Mr. Carr explained the definition of a "mobile home" from
the City's Zoning Code, and the specific sections of the
Code which restrict mobile homes to mobile home parks.
He further explained that any alterations to mobile homes
must be reviewed and approved by the Department of Labor
and Industries. Alterat ion of the mobile home could result
in it being classified as something other than a mobile
home, by the Department of Labor and Industries.
The Commission, Mr. Bei1 and staff, discussed the matter
at length. Mr. Beil concluded by stating that he would
determine what modifications the Department of Labor and
Industries would allow and what they would then classify
the structure, and with that possibly new definition, return
to the Planning Department for evaluation with respect
to the Zoning Ordinance.
VI. STAFF REPORTS
There were none.
VII. REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
Jim Hulett expressed thanks to the Public Works Department
for the light at Race and Boulevard. He also inquired
about a travel trailer at the northeast corner of Campbell
and Mt. Angeles Road. Staff will investigate its use.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:45 P.M.
~~~
u D. Carr, Secretary
Tape condition: poor
SR