HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 05/18/1998
CALL TO ORDER-
REGULAR MEETING:
ROLL CALL:
APPROVAL OF
MINUTES:
Contract and Level of
Funding for Marketing
T aurism
LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Port Angeles, Washington
May 18, 1998
Councilman Wiggins called the meeting of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee to
order at 1 :30 p.m.
Members Present:
Councilman Wiggins, Councilman Campbell, Bob Harbick,
Richard Vogel, John Platt, Steve Oliver, Randy Johnson,
Bill Rinehart, and Jim Haguewood.
Members Absent:
David Morris and Bob Grattan.
Staff Present:
Projects and Grants Administrator Smith and Clerk Upton.
Others Present:
Rick Hert, Laurel Black, Ed Hansen, and Scott Hance.
Dick Vogel moved to approve the minutes ofthe Lodging Tax Advisory Committee
~eetings of April 28, 1998 and May 5, 1998. The motion was seconded by Randy
Johnson and carried unanimously.
Contract and Level of Funding for Marketing Tourism: Tim Smith distributed the
following documents to the committee members: a draft scope of work, lodging tax
projections into 1999, and a copy of the request for proposals. He felt it would be
helpful if the committee were to initially address the scope of work before determining
the level of the budget and the term of the agreement.
The scope of work was reviewed in detail, and the committee was in agreement that the
inventory of existing tourism programs should be left to the contractor. However, it
was noted the contractor could broaden the inventory by including county-wide
programs. Rick Hert advised the committee that, on June 2 & 3, the VCB/Chamber will
be hosting a 7 -step strategy session, during which time the attendees will discuss in
depth the approach and direction for tourism marketing.
The contractor is to identify and implement a tourism marketing and promotional
approach, targeted for completion within 60 days from the signing of the contract. A
written report and presentation is to be made to the City Council. It was noted that the
members of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee should also receive copies of the
report, and Tim Smith urged the committee members to also attend the Council meeting
when the presentation is made by the contractor. Steve Oliver expressed concern that
the contractor will be overloaded with preparing and submitting reports. He urged
caution in that the funding is to be spent on marketing.
On the matter of a joint marketing campaign, the draft scope of work indicated
cooperative strategies for joint marketing should be implemented with other tourism
campaigns within 90 days from the signing of the contract. Rick Hert requested the date
ofJanuary 1, 1999, as the contractor will be working with so many different people and
organizations. The committee members agreed this will be a time-consuming task, and
-1-
LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE
May 18, 1998
Contract and Level of
Funding for Marketing
Tourism (Cont'd)
the extension to January I would be acceptable. Laurel Black noted it will not only be
time consuming to prepare something tangible for consideration, but that it takes a
certain amount of time for the different entities to buy-off of an endeavor such as this.
Additionally, this type of effort will be ongoing throughout the term of the program.
Discussion followed about the need for cohesive marketing.
Consideration was given to the level of funding, and it was noted that the
ChamberlVCB felt it important to have sufficient funding in order to meet the City's
goals on tourism marketing. Therefore, the amount of$150,OOO per year was requested.
John Platt expressed the opinion that the group should award the full funding as a vote
of confidence, especially because the two organizations are working together so well.
John Platt moved to provide the amount of $150,000 as requested. The motion was
seconded by Dick Vogel. Lengthy discussion followed with regard to the expenses
associated with the ChamberlVCB proposal.
The committee members then expressed their individual opinions as to the award of the
$150,000. It was pointed out by Steve Oliver that he still felt a portion of the additional
2% should be kept in reserve for capital projects. Bob Harbick countered that there
should still be a reserve of funds building in spite of the $150,000 expenditure. Jim
Haguewood expressed concern with the possible duplication of funding for some
projects covered by the original 2% tax. He felt it important that the 800 number be
funded, as well as a strong Internet site. Lengthy debate ensued about the possibility
of duplication of funding, and Rick Hert assured the group that the money being
requested at this time is a completely separate issue from the original tax.
Bill Rinehart indicated he would support full funding only ifhe received assurances that
the other agencies funded with the original tax would not be jeopardized in the event
the additional tax did not generate the expected revenue. Tim Smith pointed out that
it would be to the contractor's advantage to bring the other successful activities and
events into the fold. Lengthy discussion followed about the possibility of negotiating
a lower range of funding; however, Randy Johnson did not support the micro
management of the marketing effort. Cltairman Wiggins reminded the group that of the
three proposals submitted, two were unacceptable. Discussion again centered around
the different level of expenses associated with certain aspects of the proposal, such as
the 800 number and the Internet web page. Because of the advantages the Internet
offers, Jim Haguewood wanted to be certain we didn't shortchange ourselves by under
funding that marketing effort. In responding to the consideration of different funding
options, Rick Hert indicated the proposal that was submitted represents a
comprehensive marketing program. Associated with that program is a comprehensive
marketing budget; anyone part of that program and budget is key to the overall effort.
After further discussion, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried by a
majority vote, with Steve Oliver voting in opposition.
Consideration was then given to the term of the contract. Tim Smith indicated that it
was staffs recommendation that the contract be written for a period of three years,
inclusive of a renewal option to be negotiated for an additional two years. Further, staff
has recommended that, at the end of three years, there should have been a growth of 5%
per year. The committee members, as well as the ChamberlVCB staff, supported the
three-year term.
Lengthy discussion was held on the matter of growth to be expected in lodging sales.
Tim Smith asked the committee to consider what percentage of increase should be
expected in the ftrst 18 months. Chairman Wiggins indicated that the City Council will
want to know if the contract is working successfully long before three years has passed.
He urged the committee to establish a target for growth. After further lengthy
discussion, John Platt moved that, at the end of 18 months, the group should use
as a target a 50/0 increase of bed tax generated dollars. The motion was seconded
- 2-
Contract and Level of
Funding for Marketing
Tourism (Cont'd)
ADJOURNMENT:
LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITIEE
May 18, 1998
by Randy Johnson. The motion led to discussion as to whether growth should be
based on revenues or room nights. Therefore, John Platt restated the motion that the
group is looking for a 5% increase in room nights for an IS-month period.
Therefore, the group was targeting the actual
lodging night sales counts from the lodging establishments. The committee members
also supported the receipt of information pertinent to the number of tourism inquiries
with a conversion correlated formula. Jim Haguewood felt it important to receive data
on the nurnber of inquiries, the head count, and the tax revenues. He acknowledged that
the number of inquiries and the tax revenues could be considered as additionally
reported items. A vote was taken on the restated motion, which carried
unanimously.
Bill Rinehart moved to establish the contract term at three years, with a two-year
renewal option. The motion was seconded by Randy Johnson and carried
unanimously.
Tim Smith briefly reviewed the monthly and annual reports that would be required by
contract. The reports afe to account for all funds expended, as well as to measurably
document program effectiveness.
The recommendations of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee will be presented to the
City Council at its meeting of May 19, 1998, 5:30 p.m. Committee members were
urged to attend.
The meeting adjourned at 3:20 p.m.
~:
_------ Glenn Wiggins, Chair
&~~ Lfpfu^
Becky J. U " Cler
- 3-