HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 03/05/2002
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
321 EAST FIFTH STREET
.
~ORT ANGELES
March 5, 2002
SPECIAL MEETING - 4:00 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING - 6:00 p.m.
A. CALL TO ORDER - Special Meeting (4:00 p.m.)
Interview appointments for Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission, and Civil Service Commission
(page l)
B. CALL TO ORDER - Regular Meeting (6:00 p.m.) 0.01
ROLL CALL - v
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - e;d
PUBLIC CEREMONIES, PRESENTATIONS
AND PROCLAMATIONS
Retirement Presentation for Ron Johnson,
Engineering Specialist
~~
~~ jj.~
23
~ P~esentation ~
.
C. WORK SESSION
D. LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON TillS OR FUTURE AGENDAS (By Council, Staff or Public) AND
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA (This is the opportunity for members of the
public to speak to the City Council about anything not on the agenda, please keep comments to 5-10 minutes.)
E. FINANCE
City of Forks Biosolids Request 25 Approve Request
F. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City Council minutes - February 19,2002 29 Accept Consent Agenda
regular meeting
2. City Council minutes - February 20 and 35
February 26, 2002 special meetings 37
3. Payroll information - February 17,2002- 39
$432,374.55
4. Electronic payments - February 22,2002 - 41
$184,735.20
5. Check register - February 22,2002 - 43
$751,654.48
6. 2002 Equipment Purchases from State Bid 69
7. Accept Landfill Closure of Cells 1 & 2 71
Project
8. Accept Temporary Fire Hall Roof Repairs 73
. G. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
March 5, 2002 Port Angeles City Council Meeting
Page - I
H. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS
I. RESOLUTIONS
J. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
1. Appointments to Planning Commission,
Board of Adjustment, and Civil Service
Commission
2. List City-Owned Properties for Sale
75
Appoint New Members
77
Authorize Mayor to Sign Agreement
K. PUBLIC HEARINGS - QUASI-JUDICIAL
(7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter)
1. Rezone Request - Serenity House, 2321 West 18th
Street: Request for a rezone of approximately 4.31
acres of property from RS-9, ResidentIal Single
Family, to RMD, Residential MedIUm Density.
2. Rezone Request - City of Port Angeles/Clallam
County: Rezone of property currently owned and
used for government activities from CO,
Commercial Office and RHD, Residential High
Density, to PBP, Public Buildings and Parks
89
Hold Public Hearing
141
Hold Public Hearing
L. PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER
Municipal Code Amendment - City of Port Angeles:
Proposed minor administrative amendments to Titles
2 (Board of Adjustment); 15 (EnVIronment); and 17
(Zoning) of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
159
Hold Public Hearing
M. INFORMATION
1. City Manager's Calendar/Project Status Report (Goals) (page 189)
o Integrated Finance System (Page 199)
o Summary Recruitment Report: Nov. 2001 - Feb. 2002 (Page 233)
o Power Supply Update (Page 235)
o C/O, Contracts under 15k (Page 237)
2. Parks Board Minutes - January 24, 2002 (page 239)
3. Humane Society Report - January 2002 (page 243)
4. Planning Commission Minutes - January 23,2002 (page 245)
5. Parks & Recreation Monthly Report - January 2002 (Page 249)
M. EXECUTIVE SESSION (As needed and determined by City Attorney,
Ct. ~. -10 p/u l ~~
f"1'i,It or Q) nJ k~ e
N. ADJOURNMENT
. , . . PUBLIC HEARINGS' .
Public hearings are set by the City Council in order to meet legal requirements pertaining to matters such as, land use permit applications, proposed
amendments to City land use regulations, zoning changes, annexation~. In addition, the City Council may set a public hearing in order to receive
public input prior to making decisions which impact the citizens. Certain matters may be controversial, and the City Council may choose to seek
public opinion through the public hearing process.
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
March 5, 2002 Port Angeles City Council Meeting
, Page - 2
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON. USA
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
1.
CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING:
II. ROLL CALL:
Members Present:
. Mayor Wiggins
COU/JA u)ytUw ~evs Councilman Braun
Councilman Campbell
Councilmember Erickson
Councilman Headrick
Councilmember Rogers
Councilman Williams
III.
Staff Present:
Manager Quinn
Attorney Knutson
Clerk Upton
B. Collins
M. Connelly
G. Cutler
D. McKeen
T. Riepe
Y. Ziomkowski
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
C.B~
Led by:
~
./
v"
./
./
/
=c
v
v
A
./
0/
V"
or
V-
V"
March 5. 2002
~:o6p-m
Other StafIPres,: ~
;J~~ .~
~
. . ~~'&b'~.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, USA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Attendance Roster
-
PLEASE SIGN IN
DATE OF MEETING:
March 5. 2002
LOCATION:
City Council Chambers
Please Note: IF I plan on testifying by signature below, I certify that my testimony is true and
correct under penalty of perjury by the laws of the State of Washington.
~ < ;
NrAME':
Jr ~ ~,
zA:DDHESS.
, .['~>>7V .
~ '> :
~ ' i
, ,
^, .(- : ~
,
, "
ph !!D8 3 ~I ~
L{ <:)1. S. ~..\"". ~V"rt).-~
4
VV\.
I twould like to
testify on
Agenda Item
No.
k--J
((-
K -I
1< -l
KI
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
~ORT.ANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, USA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Attendance Roster
PLEASE SIGN IN
DATE OF MEETING:
March 54 2002
LOCATION:
City Council Chambers
Please Note: IF I plan on testifying by signature below, I certify that my testimony is true and
correct under penalty of perjury by the laws of the State of Washington.
,
",
, ,
ADDRESS,:" '
I would like to
testify on
Agenda Item
No.
<[., r-M-
NAME:
t W, 6 Je~/
Bi 12.. -- ,
0'1 ~....)
~Z'I t~ ~-I
I
City of Port Angeles
~ORT ANGELES
Ordinance/Resolution Distribution List
WAS H I N G TON, USA
City Council Meeting of March 5,2002
r~~~:" "". "1'" ';~~f' ~ ~._~'[) (jJ hI A./JI
. '1' anee'1;
inesOluiiont~~~?~\; I -,.I
<. >,>"F,'C.L>, " "t . A ^ "+-. j( (I,'+-., At / J '1/ (J
. '0" "'" ~ ^"A"~ ~ 'I'll I ~:u/ / ,.,..;' A
:.:,4:;~ I .
"' .- l',/i /Ifill A
~ '0' -'<;.. ~ d rJ 'f} .4.1'1. fl ; ?IL~J1~ {J
f/ v "i;
City Manager I
City Attv. (I) } t// , v'/ I .//
Planning I V J V I VI
City Clerk (2) ~ V ~ ./ ::> .; V
Deputv Clerk (1) 1/ I ~ I V
Personnel
Cust. Svcs.
Finance
Dir./M2r.
Police Dept.
Fire Dept.
Light Dept.
Pub. Works (2)
Parks & Rec.
/
MRSC (1) J / I ~ ,V'
PDN (Summarv) ~.,g J M M I ~J MWI ,/ ~I MtY\ ,/
Extra Copies
\. 4-: D J ./ I ..,/
I)JlA I 1 ^ 1\/\ A ~ V' ,.t) ./
, , ,
I TOTAL I 4 Ci II')
.
.
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
MARCH 5, 2002
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk/Management Assistant &'
Interview Appointments for Certain Boards & Commissions
Summary: A special City Council meeting was set for Tuesday, March 5, 2002, at 4:00 p.m., for
the purpose of interviewing candidates for the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment, and
Civil Service Commission.
Recommendation: Conduct the interviews as set forth below and be prepared to make
appointments during the regular City Council meeting.
Backeround / Analysis: City staffhas been recruiting applicants to fill vacancies on various City
Boards & Commissions and, in keeping with the City Council Rules of Procedure, the City Council
is to conduct interviews of those applicants seeking appointment to the Planning Commission (1
vacancy), the Board of Adjustment (1 vacancy) , and the Civil Service Commission (1 vacancy).
Appointments for interviews have been made for Tuesday, March 5, 2002, commencing at 4:00 p.m.,
as follows:
4:00 p.m.
4:10p.m.
4:20 p.m.
4:30 p.m.
4:40 p.m.
4:50 p.m.
5:00 p.m.
5:10 p.m.
Larry Little, applicant for Planning Commission
Leonard Rasmussen, applicant for Planning Commission & Economic Development
Steering Committee
Greg Bondy, applicant for Construction Board of Appeals, Planning Commission,
and Board of Adjustment
Michael Bolster, applicant for Planning Commission
Terry Donnell, applicant for Economic Development Steering Committee, Planning
Commission, and Construction Code Board of Appeals
Stanley Harris, applicant for Downtown Forward Executive Committee and Board
of Adjustment
Nancy Lynn Newman, applicant for Planning Commission
Daniel Sterling, applicant for Civil Service Commission
Some ofthe applicants have expressed interest in more than one Board or Commission, so those not
appointed this evening will be interviewed for other positions at a later date by the appropriate
interviewing group. Copies of applications are attached for your review. Please be prepared to make
appointments during the regular City Council meeting. Attachments
1
.
.
.
2
.
~ORT ANGELES
rDJ~@nw~~
l1lJ Mf 2 8 2002 ~
wAs H I N G TON, USA.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY CLERK
Application for Appointment to a Board, Commission, or Committee
Board, Commission, or Committee to which you are seeking appointment
7kn ~ I"':J (6 WI f'I1:,.5 ./bn.
Board or CommissIOn F 1 Name
Board or CommIssion Full Name
Board or CommissIOn Full Name
Applicant Name and General Information
L c..,.,. 7
First
"is L t' HIe.
MI Last
.
12..~"f e.
Home street address
.2 "41( 6 f- .
p.., -r ~St../e~
City
wI#-
State
ge3~ 7-
Zip Code
1/7 . /31> I
Home phone number Work phone number
Certification and location Information Circle one
Are you currently a City employee? Y es ~
Are you a cItizen of the United States?@ No
Are' you a CIty resIdent? ~ No Do you own/manage a busmess in the CIty? Yes@
Do you hold any profeSSIOnal lIcenses, regIstratIOns or certIficates In any fi~ld (lIst below)?@ No
"J"') ~ ..L; ':. +.,. i
Are you aware of any conflIct of mterest which mIght arise by your service on a City Board or COrnrn,Jsslon? If so,
please explam: '
.
In compliance with the Amencan DIsabIlIties Act, If you WIll need special accommodatIons because of a physical
hmltatlOn, please contact the City Clerk, 417-4634, so appropnate arrangements can be made.
(OVER)
3
"
Work Experience
List most recent expenence first (or elaborate on a resume If you prefer)
1. 6el~ Owne.,," 0' / ~( o'f tqS .
,
Employer Your Title From (MN) To (M )
D~-+,~~
Boef Job descnphon
2. LL.sPHS 1) ~ ~~ +-- /0 /78 /o/SO
I .
Employer Your Title From (M/Y) To (M/Y)
T::>s.. ./,'~ + IV~'" '& ,q. V
Bnef Job descnptlon (
3.
Employer Your Title From (MN) To (MN)
Bnef Job description
Education
List most recent expenence first
1. Ll~\" .~ W Pc-
InstitutIOn/LocatIOn
N\ PH
Credits earnedlMaJor area of study
Yes~
Graduated?
2. (v\eJ.~l C.ol~
InshtutlOn/LocatlOn
0+ &,4 "DM,O
CredIts earned/Major area of study
aa No
Graduated?
.
tJ:i. No
u.... IVe f/ I
Credits eamedlMaJOT area of study
Graduated?
Charitable, Social, and Civic Activities and Memberships
List major activities you have partlclpated m during the last five years
1. Y me A
OrganizatIOn and locatIOn
Group's purpose/objective
~~-u
# of members
Advi~O"t KoC&..,.~
Bnef descnptlOn 0 your partlclpahon
2. ?orf ~, p'{e,~
OrganizatIOn and location
?4I'.,.I'k.; j ~c. c.-< .84-A.",{..,'.(:1u.-4..~
Group's purpose/objective
a,...,.m .. ~ S" ,'0-., -.- 10
# of members
A-~~ "6_~A
Bnef descnptlOn of your partiCipatIOn
'3. "FI"'_"-lt", ?r 0 - 1/. P.
~ 8.'
Applicant Sign ure
tIf. ~.,.+ ~5e.{"!I ..5Wil11 ~/lAob. T~.
1/2 ~_J()?
I I-
Date
.
Submit completed forms to: Office of the City Clerk, City of Port Angeles, 321 E 5th Street, POBox 1150,
Port Angeles, Washmgton, 98362 4 1/99
.
FORT .ANGELES
[D) rn @ rn 0 W rn fii11
lJl) _ 232002 ~!
WAS H I N G TON, USA
" CITY OF PORT ANGELES
eln CLERK
Application for Appointment to a Board. Commission, or Committee
Board. Commission. or Committee to which you are seeking appointment
~ · n ' ·
/) YL(\ N~)\\1 G ~t> I'i\~' S S 1 () rJ
Board or Commission Full Name
~ ~ (,'(!.. c ~ e "": <:.. D,v-e. \ 0 ~ M ~ tV) 3ft. t: Q 11\./ G
Board or Commission Full Name
~ M M ;'TT <: ~
Board or CommissIOn Full Name
Applicant Name and Generallnformatio'1
L6ctJrtY2-D Ill. ~::Sh VSSE sU
First MI Last
JJI~
~13~
Home street address
PORI
CIty
WPST
$TIC~cT
.
G:\ tJ GG L{ .s
State
WF)
98'-3c;, 3
ZIp Code
'360 - Jj~~-
Home phone number
~O,34
Work phone number
Certification and Location Information CIrcle one
Are you currently a City employee? Yes ~ Are you a CItIzen of the United States? ~ No
Are you a City resident?c9NO Do you own/manage a busmess in the City? Yes~
Do you hold any profeSSIOnal lIcenses, regIstratIOns or certificates ill any field (list below)? Ye~
Are you aware of A1 conflict of lIlterest which mIght anse by your service on a City Board or CommiSSIOn? If so,
please explam' 1 6
.
In comphance With the Amencan DisabIlIties Act, If you Will need speCial accommodatIons because of a phYSical
lImItatIOn, please contact the City Clerk, 417-4634, so appropnate arrangements can be made,
(OVER)
5
Work Experience '
List most recent expenence first,(or elaborate on a resume If you prefer)
\. ~~i\eE:D o/d,()OC
Employer >'~',,j, Your TItle From (MfY)
,
-......"'-..-..
To (MfY)
.
~
Bnef job descnphon
}. (AD 'TiC! I-I~' C IAoJ
Your Title
{Y){) T~ c1J\c' ~
&/;<j 9 0
I
From (MfY)
a/a.o () e)
.
To (M/Y)
I C (Vl VIeR.. Seer); r:
3. (lSAA lleTV<.!lIR.J< W- 61/ '79,/ /l / I 'i'/l{
Employer Your Title From '(M/Y) To (M/Y)
~)~4~/J~ J
~nef~~(f)hon~~ ~f1nud~/~ g)19(S' 7//99-3
2. G F\ P
Employer
Education
List most recent expenence first
l?e-u '
Institutlon/Locatl
~ ves@
Graduated?
@NO
Graduated?
.
Yes No
3.
InstttutlOn/LocatlOn
Credits eamedlMajor area of study
Graduated?
Charitable, Social, and Civic Activities and Memberships
List major achvities you have participated ill during the last five years
~~-U
"
vn~A
# of members
j-}O
.
Submit completed forms to: Office of the City Clerk, City of Port Angeles, 321 E 5th Street, POBox 1150,
Port Angeles, Washmgton, 98362 6 1/99
~ORTMGELES
1o)~@U\Yl~~
lJ1) FEB 2 0 2002 ~
WAS H I N G TON, U. 5 A.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY CLERK
Application for Appointment to a Board, Commission, or Committee
Board, Commission, or C~mmittee to whic~ you are seeking appointment
l'Otv~TIZ.o.)'-r\.ot..J COb~
Board or Cormmssion Full Name
~A.R.t::>
0..... A.\>'j)'E.A"L~
'""PL.A.fV"-'\ I\J Go Co loV\ "'" , ~ \ 0 t-J
Board or CommissIOn Full Name
~CP""R.. ~ \!)~ fl.,b~\)~\N\:~ 1'0..) \"
Board or Commission Full Name
Applicant Name and General Information
.
7/4 WC.~r
Home street address
\<,
MI
$, ~'O-\-
\SoklbY
Last
~r'~'Q...-"'(
First
<:x-
Vo~~ AU"'1i-(..~~
CIty
WA
gB ~~ ~
Zip Code
State
(3~O) 565 - 83~"=>
Home phone number
SAil"\. e
Work phone number
Certification and Location Information
CIrcle one
Are y~u currently a City employee? Yes~
Are you a citizen of the Umted States~No
Are you a City reSident? tJ; No Do you own/manage a busmess in the City? @ No
Do you hold any professIOnal hcenses, registrations or certIficates in any field (list below)? Yes@
Q':fZJ-)~~ ~-.ofG. ~J.~..:n.4U"" :r::;u...L\'L)~T l~toJ
,
Are you aware of any conflict of interest which might arise by your service on a City Board or CommIssIon? If so,
please explain: ~OtU"E-
In complIance wIth the Amencan Dlsablhhes Act, If you wIll need special accommodatIons because of a phYSical
hmitatlOn, please contact the City Clerk, 417...4634, so appropnate arrangements can be made.
(OVER)
.
7
Work Experience
List most recent expenence first (or elaborate on a resume if you prefer)
1. K'A tJ t:> I.J 'f=.. tJ\1i.\2. V Q. \ ~ 1L
Employer
OWIoU...1:.....
Your Title
:31 ClO
From (MN)
~0AA.J"
To (MN)
.
<6-;; ~-,'2AL
Bnef Job description
C'.f")to.JT~A.(' T It...) C::. .
,
'\:)U.~ \ ~t..J
~ ?~?-""",,\.\rl&IJG
2 . 1: "-l"t' 'i2 '\ Y
Employer
t.t-J\J \\Gok) M-e.~'--
Your Title
"?-~Q. , I o'Z- C\)iZ\2~'\
From (MN) To (MN)
YLA.~k)\rUC"::> a ~~\.L ?ltetY\\T\luJ6
Cl!>~'iZ.AC.\' t....lC~
Brief job descnptlon
3. AG;;uA~~
Employer
\; f.,.J \) I
s~, ( LA~ IMG -e)
Your Title
qe
From (MN)
a:::>
To (MN)
~Al'J~~ "E..b
Bnef job descnption
E.uu
tA.R
lLAJ 'Sl1;>pO\2..~ OF- ~~ -I AtnuA,~I..L.,,~
Education
List most recent experience first
1. v/~1U..1J
InstitutlOn/LocatlOn
WIA (;. , CpA') 'B.~.' ~tJ\J, Vouc.'1 'Z\ A~~.
Credits eamedlMajOT area of study
~o
Graduated?
~No
2. "R."'.HlUStJU'IT M::::>
Institution/Locatlon
"&Jcp\v.J~U6 6" fuK~1
Credits eamedlMajor area of study
Graduated?
.
Yes No
3.
Institution/Location
CredIts eamedlMajor area of study
Graduated?
Charitable, Social, and Civic Activities and Memberships
List major activities you have participated in during the last five years
1. 1;,,1'-~\~~ Col::>~
OrgamzatIon and locatIOn
"b:.,~ 0'::" A?p~~
Group's purpose/objective
~
# of members
\~?j2.CL~~ u-r..A<.. Bvl~"'-'c:;"
Bnef descriptIOn of your participation
Co '" iZ. <".
2._LJ~ A,- \ e
Orgamzation and location
..,..~~ C~~\.~
Group's purpose/objectIve
\ 2-
# of members
Applicant Signature
Z-lerO"?-
Date
~~U\.V"JJ.JtJ'IlJ::::> ?C!>......c.""( s
Brief descriptIOn of your partiCipatIOn
.
Submit completed forms to: Office of the City Clerk, City of Port Angeles, 321 E 5th Street, P. O. Box 1150,
Port Angeles, Washmgton, 98362 8 1/99
.
~ORT.ANGELES
roJ~@~U~~
lJl) JAN 2 8 2002 ~
WAS H I N G TON, USA.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY CLERK
Application for Appointment to a Board, Commission, or Committee
Board, Commission, or Committee to which you are seeking appointment
P\&lY\";lo'\~ (O.v\M:5S; o~
Board or CommisslOn Fu ame
Board or CommISSIon Full Name
Board or Commission Full Name
Applicant Name and General Information
H ; ,-kCl~ \ 50 \ 5-\.e ("
.
113(,
T.
MI
+k
\'=-
Last
First
(.0.
Home street address
City
f or+ A~j€ \is
'.~9B--~~.18
Home phone number
WC\ .
,e3{.S
ZIp Code
State
bC63-5447
Work phone number
Certification and Location Information CIrcle one
Are you currently a City employee? Yes ~ Are you a citIzen of the United States? ~ No
Are you a CIty resIdent? ~ No Do you own/manage a busmess m the City? Yes rIP>
Do you hold any professIOnal lIcenses, regIstrations or certIficates III any field (lIst below)? dJA No
BSCt;") EIT (CIVIL E~6'Ne:-E~ltJ6)
Are you aware of any conflIct of mterest which might anse by your service on a CIty Board or CommisslOn? If so,
please explam:
In compliance with the American DisabilIties Act, If you Will need special accommodatlOns because of a phYSical
limitation, please contact the CIty Clerk, 417-4634, so appropnate arrangements can be made.
(OVER)
.
9
Work Experience
List most recent experience first (or elaborate on a resume If you prefer)
'i/ . , , 6y-~d. "-~
1. I ("I~O ""s+-rtA(..+lc~ el"\ rr-.eer
Employer . ,,' Your Title
f ~s pon.S d.LR f ~t' I a1 ov.t ()~
Bnef Job descnptlon
k/oO
Pre: S e~1:
To (MN)
op e.r C4 +~ tI ~S
.
From (MN)
ea.r+Lc..;>oY" k
2. ~ c~V'$;<l \a. .groS.
Employer
Kcu., S e V (: r4. ,
Bnef Job descnptton
Fo(~,...,a.......
Your Title
"/'B fJ/06
From (MN) To (MN)
C:o", S+J"\ (;
I b e; 7
From (M/Y)
~ C;S
To (M/Y)
he,,",v
3 e'i.SCk.S
Employer
(i V: \ ["1'\5: t'ee"~ V\~
Brief Job descnptlOn J
De>;"......
work
Education
List most recent experience first
1. U Y\~vet'';~+
Instttutton/Locatton
4
<J.1sk: (\ -b> "-
B~Lt
(9 No
Credits eamedlMaJor area of study
Graduated?
2. 'Pej\.~nSu.(c..
InstitutlOn/Locatton
(oUe L
APS
@PNO
Graduated?
.
3. l'b,..+ A~J(Lr)
InstttutlOn/LocatlOn
~:1l ~LLoo) (Ie;B,)
Credits eamedlMajor area of study
@NO
'Graduated?
Charitable, Social, and Civic Activities and Memberships
List major actlvIues you have pamcipated ill during the last five years
1.
OrgamzatIon and locatIon
Group's purpose/objectIve
# of members
Bnef descnptlOn of your parttclpatIon
2.
Organization and location
Group's purpose/obJecttve
# of members
Brief descnptlOn of your participation
~~cLJ', e~A:7
Applicant Signature
o ,L' IS-!ez.,
------ - .--- -
Date
.
Submit completed forms to: Office of the City Clerk, City of Port Angeles, 321 E 5th Street, P O. Box 1150,
Port Angeles, Washmgton, 98362 1/99
10
[D) ~ @ ~ n 1!1 ~ ~!
U\1 FEB - 4 2002 ~
.
~ORT .ANGELES
WAS H I N G TON. USA.
CllY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY CLERK
Application for Appointment to a Board, Commission, or Committee
Board, Commission, or Committee to which you are seeking appointment
ECcJY)DmJ~ De~/opmeV1+ S~n'ntA ~mfh)fk~.
Board or Commission Full Name ~
j2Ja n Y)I r't~ ~m m IS 'S I nY]
Board or Commlss Full Name
~~5+rUc:-h0Y1 6Jd~, bO&rr:l of' I+ppeals
Board or Commission Full Name
.
Applicant Name and General Information
-r.-fn:lj UOl/net)
First MI Last
\\f" 5-t.
IQ'5
~()U.c--th
Home street address
Rr4 An5~ l.e-s
City
lj97-/Lf () I
Home phone number
UJft
State
OJ ~ 3l, 3
Zip Code
fj&O-&~/70
Work phone number
Certification and Location Information CIrcle one
Are you currently a City employee? Yes~ Are you a citizen of the Umted States?@ No
Are you a CIty resldent8NO Do you ownimanage a busmess m the City? Ye@
Do you hold any professional hcenses, registrations or certificates in any field (list below)? yesE)
Are you aware of any conflict of mterest which might arise by your service on a City Board or Commission? If so,
please explain:
In compliance WIth the Amencan DIsabIlities Act, If you Will need speCIal accommodations because of a physical
hmltatIon, please contact the City Clerk, 417-4634, so appropriate arrangements can be made.
(OVER)
.
1 1
Work Experience
List most recent expenence first (or elaborate on a resume if you prefer)
.
1. / qc;-
Employer From (MN) To (MN)
C om mer t!{ iW( {UvJ N0-S J J 6'nfJ d eO n :sfr-ue- h' on
Bnef job descnptlOn
2M ~~.s 5:::1,00/ Od'r- fJ;gjj, /I/q7 - P""5ea+
Employer Y our Title From (MN) To (MN)
I OM an ass/slztt1f f?a1ch Ct-f sleUt~s m,s. (;){ -bo#tltl d- hask:J~l.t
Bnef job descnption
3. LlOI<. Cons-/rue..'h-m - (!~Ier qLq{p !J18'
Employer Your Title From (MN) To ( )
aJt pj,d\~ (); ~ll~
Luov~ In
Bnef job descnption
Education
List most recent experience first
1.ft/1{!'JJa Co t l-ee-e J
InshtutlOn/Location
San DJ-q;o I eA-
Credits earnedlMajor area of study
ves@
Graduated?
Yes No
Credits earned/Major area of study
Graduated?
.
2.
Instituhon/Location
Yes No
3.
Institution/Location
Credits earnedlMaJor area of study
Graduated?
Charitable, Social, and Civic Activities and Memberships
List major activities you have participated ill during the last five years
1. 'Yt5Yt- Rr.D-e~S '1011.;+h fJa~1:af! ~ dcard 0 P DIt1av!u-s / J-
OrganizatIOn and locatIOn Group's purpose/objective # of members
f1J ~I{Y\ &-tf ~ Vl U. J ) q q I
Brief descnptlOn of your partiCipatIOn
2. LJ
k&th
Il(
Orgamz hon nd location Group's purpose/objeChve
61 n u, J qq 8 fnrJr1atjd {t kal11
Bnef descn hon of your partlclpahon
# of members
and tuf)t#nl-~ hoard tJ'1 tffl14
[" minor 1-8A-(jlu tom/H.
d. - tJ 3- C>d.
Date
.
Submit completed forms to: Office of the City Clerk, City of Port Angeles, 321 E. 5th Street, POBox 1150,
Port Angeles, Washmgton, 98362 12 1/99
FORT ANGELES
rDJ ~ @ rn 0 w rn.fn)
till FES I I 2Of1l ~
WAS H I N G TON, U. 5 A.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY CLERK
Application for Appointment to a Board>> Commission>> or Committee
Board>> Commission>> or Committee to which you are seeking appointment
\).." ~"" -\ C!l V VI t- (') -t- "'- 0 <-~ 'E 'I -e G-'+ : Ii.o CC' """ "'-- : A-\ ~
Board or CommIssion Full Name
Boo.~~
Board or CommISSIon Full Name
o~
~~'y~""'-eA
Board or Commission Full Name
.
Applicant Name and General Information
S\~'>-,'^ \ e'i \..1 '\\0... ,
First MI
II
\,0 "'- '. J.- \, ~
k \f'... \. .e_\.e ~
J State
(h \ ~
Home street address
~~'" \-
City
~60 L\ \'1
~ \ S
Last
\\v~
~~ C\<t'3(g-;>
Zip Code
Home phone number Work phone number
\ C\,'-;>
Certification and Location Information CIrcle one
Are you currently a City employee? Yes ~
Are you a cItizen of the Umted States? ~ No
Are you a City resIdent?~ No Do you own/manage a business in the City? Yes @
Do you hoid any professional hcenses, registrations or certificates 111 any field (list below)? yes<f::)
Are you aware of an~ conflict of mterest which might arise by your service on a City Board or CommIssion? If so,
please explam' ~ d
In compliance wIth the Amencan DisabIlities Act, If you will need specIal accommodations because of a phYSIcal
hmltation, please contact the City Clerk, 417-4634, so appropriate arrangements can be made.
(OVER)
.
13
Work Experience
List most recent expenence first (or elaborate on a resume If you prefer)
~. ~ (\ t-"\ H. "'~~ ~\ ~ C; Sx ~(0 0 \ D ~ d ~v ~ \J \' " \J ~(' \ I q ~ -\ 0 Q ".
Employer Y our Title From (MN) To (MN) ,
~r~oo\ ~\..J~ \\. \'-'~\
Brief Job descnptlon
2.D ~ C (Ja~\ (:,,-~,,d
Employer
D~~ \( .0-\-
Your TItle
~~\L
~.\
'" ~'-\- ~ OV'- c" O~
3
Employer
Your TItle
From (M/Y)
To (M/Y)
______ _________.~__ _._____~_____........_w_________~__~_ --------..,","-- ~------,--_.._-
Brief Job descnptlon
Education
LIst most recent experience first
1.~}... ~~ \\\ e~ f\I\ e'J ~ U:J
InstltutlOn/Locatlon
~,,<S\'<..(?~ ~':4J\M.',\j..""3\ ,~\o~NO
Credits eamedlMaJor area of study Graduated?
Yes No
2.
Institution/Location
Credits earned/Major area of study
Graduated?
.
Yes No
3
Institution/Location
Credits earnedlMaJor area of study
Graduated?
Charitable, Social, and Civic Activities and Memberships
List major activItIes you have particIpated in dunng the last five years
1.
~~~()c.:\~~" -
# of members
~~.,.~4\l-1IO \.\. O~S::. \ c- \ J
OrgamzatlOn and loca IOn Group's purpose/objective
~l:\S\-~"'~~\;\ ()S~ '\ (\~1
Bnef d;scnptlOn of your partICipation '-
2.
Organization and locatIOn
Group's purpose/objective
# of members
Bri
.....
~ \~~ 02-
Date
.
Submit completed forms to: Office of the City Clerk, City of Port Angeles, 321 E 5th Street, P. O. Box 1150,
Port Angeles, Washmgton, 98362 14 1/99
'"
..
~ORT.ANGELES
roJ~@rnowmfn)
lI1J APR - 4 2001 ~
.
WAS H J N G TON, USA.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY CLERK
Application for Appointment to a Board, Commission, or Committee
Board, Commission, or Committee to which you are seeking appointment
elf P/ClnI\IV\.
Board or CommissIOn Full Name-
Board or COnUTIlSSlOn Full Name
Board or CommissIOn Full Name
Applicant Name and General Information
. tJ CLY\ Q.'1 L" Vt l'\ Ne w ~ll{\ '.
FlISt MI q 83 " Last 1'V\.Q..1 ,\ ~v. oJ-dch' e...!) S
Lh s. +r e. _ t~ p, o. B o. .3 0 <1 J
.
YOyt A-r:je.le-_,- I
City
wA
State
q ~ 3 <0 .;L
Zip Code
3lco
Lf-S ~ 10 I $1
3loo +S-<.~ /1 ~ ~
Work phone number
Home phone number
Certification and Location Information CIrcle one
Are you currently a City employee? Yes 6) Are you a citizen of the United States? 9 No
Are you a CIty resident? 9 No Do you own/manage a business in the City? Yes@
Do you hold any profeSSIOnal hcenses, registrations or certificates In any field (lIst below)? Yes@
Are you aware of any lonfhct of interest which might arise by your service on a CIty Board or Commission? If so,
please explain: N 1+
,
.
In complIance wIth the American DIsabIlItIes Act, If you wIll need specIal accommodatIons because of a phYSIcal
limItatIon, please contact the CIty Clerk, 417-4634, so approprIate arrangements can be made.
(OVER)
~.to: DLD
-</-4.01 6<-
15
, jvJ~rk'E~p~ri~'nce S -C~ a. +f-;",~'/'\e-d
l1ist most recent experience first (or elaborate on a resume If you prefer)
, !~
1.
Employer
~
Your Title
From (M/Y)
To (M/Y)
.
Bnef Job descnptIon
2.
Employer
Your Title
From (M/Y)
To (M/Y)
',\, ,'''',;".
, B~ief jo~ gescriptl(~n ..
1 (
\ ,-.
.' (f
,
,>
J
. 3.'
" EmpJ<?yer
Your Title
From (M/Y)
To (M/Y)
. t',
\ "~', ,',
. ,
,
,h
...
Bpef JOo d~sC:fl~tJO!l
t
. :-
,
Education
List most recent experience first
1 'Po ('+1 CA..Y\.d ~ 1o.-fe Uh, Ve.if ~ I ~~ Wo me.A'.5 ~ fu.d ;e-s.
Institution/Location Credits earnedlMaJor area of study
3.
Institution/Location
cQNO
Graduated?
~NO
.
Graduated?
Yes No
Credits earnedlMaJor area of study
Graduated?
Charitable, Social, and Civic Activities and Memberships
List major activities you have participated in during the last five years
1 'Pen ; (\ <.u. <let b, ~ PLl ~Re.~o 1\.1l hiIJI/\ Ce II +e..!
OrganIzatIOn and location Group's ijurpose/obJecnve
, A-/tunCA. tn/e., J l.~Pv" re...' reS\) f \A -he (\
Me...d/Clhor\ 1- bOQvJ cl"t'_.....e 10 (),Y\.e ~'\. r
Brief description of your partiCipatIOn '
l:l~
# of members
2. W~
ou+re..A... f
'DO
# of members
f'~
o I
Date
.
Submit completed forms to: Office of the City Clerk, City ofPort Angeles,.321 E. 5th Street, P., O. Bo~ 1150,
Port Angeles, Washmgton, 98362 ' ", 1/99
16
It
.
.
.
.'
Nancy Lynn Newman, doing business as Cultural Ecologies, is a group
facilitator, trainer, and coach. Over the last twenty years, she has led
seminars and skills workshops in team building, communication,
presentation skills, management and leadership, diversity, Myers Briggs and
Singer-Loomis applications, as well as working with individuals in
professional coaching relationships. More recently her work has been
directed towards facilitating executive retreats for developing vision, values,
and purpose, leadership transition, and strategic planning.
She has worked with companies throughout the country including Levi
Strauss & Co., Nike, Inc., Kaiser Permanente, Steelscape (formerly Coated
Steel Corporation), Columbia Sportswear Company, CyberSight, and Mentor
Graphics Corporation.
I
Her current focus is on creating learning experiences and strategies
that link personal vision and commitment with company mission. She is
committed to strengthening individual and team skills that expand
contributions to organizations and their communities.
The business name, Cultural Ecologies, refers to the relationships
between individuals and groups and their work environment. It suggests an
assumption of interdependency. Along with the mission statement,
"Strengthening Organizational Culture Through Purposeful Communication",
Cultural Ecologies reflects the belief in the importance of communication in
creating and maintaining healthy and productive corporate. cultures.
Cultural Ecologies 2001
17
"
Nancy Lynn Newman
P.O. Box 3097
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
(360) 452-1188
.
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
January 1993 to Present
Cultural Ecologies. Owner. Corporate training, organizational development
consulting, facilitation, personal coaching, and public speaking. Develop and
deliver workshops and seminars. See attached for topics and client list.
October 1988 to December 1992
Pacific Learning Systems. Director, Western Region. Responsible for strategic
planning, marketing, sales management, training, and customer service. In
addition, coordinate and lead on-site seminars for client companies nationally.
July 1986 to October 1988
Lancome, Division of Cosmair, Inc. Regional Trainer. Responsible for personnel
training and development in seven western states. Coordinate and lead classroom
seminars on product knowledge, sales skills, motivation, and business
development.
.
March 1985 to June 1986
Los Angeles Unified School District. Teacher/Coordinator, Gifted and Talented
Program. Responsibilities included student assessment and program placement,
curriculum development, program supervision and classroom teaching.
July 1981 to March 1985
NLB Enterprises. Independent marketing consultant and manufacturers'
representative. Developed and implemented marketing plans for small and mid-
sized businesses on a contract basis. Prepared and presented seminars on
computer systems and applications for small business.
September 1975 to July 1981
Boehringer Ingelheim, Ltd. Pharmaceutical Sales Representative. Developed and
maintained accounts with physicians, hospitals, and pharmacies.
.
18
~
.
.
.
.
CUL TURAL ECOLOGIES
Strengthening Organizational Culture Through Purposeful Communication
Nancy Lynn Newman
P.O. Box 3097
Port Angeles, WA 98362
360 452-1188
360 452-1168 (fax)
Skills Summary
Highly effective facilitator and trainer with over sixteen years of experience in
education, training and development, public speaking, and organizational
development consulting. Extensive background working with manufacturing,
healthcare, utility, and service industries. Myers-Briggs and Singer-Loomis
qualified, and certified in all Zenger Miller training programs. Current focus on
team development, communication skills training, meeting facilitation, personal
coaching, and creating employee training and development strategies linked with
company vision.
TOPICS INCLUDE:
Context-Directed Communication
Singer-Loomis Type Deployment Inventory
Myers Briggs Applications
Selling Skills
Team Dynamics
Presentation Skills
Conflict Management
Gender Diversity
CLIENTS
FSI Flir Systems, Inc.
CNF Transportation, Inc.
Wacker Siltronic Corporation
NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc.
Mentor Graphics Corporation
Columbia Sportswear Company
In Focus Systems, Inc.
Entranco
The Seattle Times
Levi Strauss & Co.
Nike, Inc.
19
..
'7
:;<l~ORT ANGELES
1" ' " ~I < ,\ ,
, WAS H IN G,T 0 N. y. S A.
ill 1 @ m 0 VI mill
,,' ,," '" ,.," ," , "~
~, , ,," './ -,':I" ~
',' F~~-' l3 '~' ' " ~'
" ~ , - , ,- ".., '
...1,. ,
., " , "
, CITY OF PORT ANGELES,
, CITY CLERK' " "
, . ~ "
Application for, Appoint~ent to ~ Board, Commission, or Ccim'mitt~~
Board, Commission. or Committee to which you are s~eki~g ap'ppintment
e.-/ v I,A' JC...fVJ C' J3 C ~ #1/.7 / 5f" ;'t/A/ . 'o;'~; ,
Board or Commission Full Name
, " -
, Bmiid or.ComiIiission FiitrName:' '
, . '
" ,
Board or COIJUDlssic>Il Full Name
.
Applicant Name and General Information
:1ldNJE"-',
st :,' ,MI
, , ~ ~ " '
/&'J~' V:;;'iT'~,:'S7:" '
Home street address ".." '.. c' ," ".-- "
~fiT4;b-nES' ' '.';//1#:
City . " ' State
~.. ~ ::~':'"I;~ ~": "'-,.~
'.A
'~'~T6/(A/ivtY
" ~ast
."
,~ .~
, -';, -;. . ~
~ I _. :.' '~<, ..., 1 I v 7-;::. '.; ... '" J-
" .....,.'...- ,;! 't. .: -
'r
.3 {o.- A/I? -..s-~9'6
Home phone number .
?t:?3~5 '
Zip Code ,
.~/'
Work phone number
Certification and location Informati9rl Cir~leone. '
Are you cu~ently a CIty employee? yeG/ Are you a cit~~en of th~ United ~~ate~~ . No
Are you a City reSideni?&NO Do you own/manage a business in the City? Yes~' ", ,
Do you hold' any profession~llicenses, registratIons or certificates in any field (list below)? Y e~
, .
, '
Are you aware of any con . ct of mterest which might arise by your service on a City Board or Commission? If so,
please explain: ' .
In compliance with the American DisabihtIes Act, if you will need special accommodaho~s ,~e~~use o~ a physical
limitation, please contact the City Clerk, 417-4634, so appropnate arrangements can be made. .. ,
(OVER)
.
21
_~:._ ,__~~..._.- __ ~ ~-!o_....~_._........_,....._~
, ", :..1 \'1 II ;.] r:;) ';1 ,? ~I .
. i1 I 2l lJ I. :!l' 1)! ;;! f r: ;
, I ~ ~- ""........._..._.._.....'...~1....._..........,. ~ .' 1
I VVprk Experience 1 ~ < : ;
, L~~t m<?s'in;c~nt.expe~l~nc~ p,rsti(or elaborate on a resume if you prefer} , ,,;
'.._J ' \1.,1',' . \':','; !. J! . i . .,
l,f,;,,_;; ..;'~':.r_,Vf_':.:"~,'t./C -, ,;6 '.6S.,.,., ~~{', i"::.
Employer." o.'.~"" ,dJ, Your TItle rom(MN) T (MIY)' . ,'r,/f'::"o:. ;.
,~ ,\~ '"^, <~"'i>~ e . ::-..' ,~.,' f\'~ " ... " I:~ ...
_.~....~':r>H/W/k 44;:,':0;';;" '~J':~A !?Est:?O/rcFS Clr '. e'Jlkif:1tJIT
Brief Job descnpti~n .. .', ','. . .
2, ~~ 'A/7~;lfCIt~~CbL. ""';o/9(~
Employer Y our Title Ff'om (MN)
.2/J?;:ti- ~rti ~4;Y
~l / ' ,0:~,
, .
~I "
, , ,,~ .
.' ;'t.'..,
3:~~';:':;:: ~.:.
/~ /::3C?/~,q
To (MN) /
Brief job descnption
3,
Employer
Your TItle
From (MN)
To (MN)
Brief job descnption
',I,
Charitable, Social, and Civic Activities and Memperships
List major activities you have partiCIpated in during the last five years
1, V #r,L{gcA. () ~ye -
OrgamzatIon and locatlOn Gr piS purpose/objectIve
5.G/fI/K PH CtJI1M/1/Lt'&- /rv/'/~ Jflf%"~/Vc-
Brief description of your partIcipation .,/
07 (~ <
2./#S /W/'/tge.K FAirs -O'4>.IVf/rfY.#/~Sfi(/JC.l~-
Orgamzation and location Group's purpose/objectIve
Education
LIst most recent experience first.
"
l.iJE'/I'/7~ U## .c.o ~h ,Ea.pr17/(~/M/Jf'/A/,~~
InstltutlOn/LocatlOn Credits eamed/Major area of study .
~. #J#//:;;fe/J ///~~ C;cP~~ C/;.;4r'oF ~r-;;:
Institution/LocatlOn ,C;redits earned/Major area'o ~tudy ,
3.
Institution/Location
,Credits,eamed/Major area of study
~~
, "
: Gniduatedf:":
../::it:?Q" <. ,
tz:~, p",
. Graduated?
-@NO"
Graduated?
.
/ft~
# of members
/ -5tJ -r
# of members
Date
.
Submit completed forms to: Office of the City Clerk, City of Port Angeles, 321 E. 5th Street, P. O. Box 1150,
Port Angeles, Washmgton, 98362 22 1/99
.i
~. "
PROCLAMATION
Ronald Johll1son's Retirement
July 5, 1984 - February 28, 2002
\VHEREAS, Ron has worked for the City of Port Angeles since July 5, 1094 in the capacity of
Engineering Technician and Engineenng Specialist; and
WHEREAS, Ron has progressed from surveying and inspection to project development and
construction management and performed an outstanding job for the Public Works
and Utilities Department; and
WHEREAS, Ron's professional approach and positive attitude insured that the many projects he
managed, including the award-winning Downtown Watermain and Sidewalks
Reconstruction, City Hall, Fire Station, Senior Center, Library, and Waterfront Trail,
became facilities in which we all take pride; and
WHEREAS, Ron's support and enthusiasm in managing demolition and design activities for the
restoration ofthe Carnegie Library has helped to preserve the history of Port Angeles;
and
WHEREAS, Ron's stewardship through his initiative, day-to-day activities, and serving on
community committees has helped to protect the unique environment of Port
Angeles; and
WHEREAS, Ron's honest open communication and flexibility with architects, engmeers,
contractors, fellow employees, and the public, is well-known; and
WHEREAS, Ron desires to retire from City employment;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Glenn Wiggins, Mayor, on behalfofthe Port Angeles City Council, do
hereby congratulate Ron Johnson on a long and dedicated career with the City and wish him the best
dunng his retirement. ~~~
March 5 , 2002
Glenn Wiggms, Mayor
.
.
.
DORT'I A lNGE'LE'S'
1~ ,J"h. i .J'."
-- , - '
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
MARCH 5,2002
To:
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
Glenn Cutler, Public Works and Utilities Director
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of City of Forks Biosolids
Summary: The City of Forks has requested that the City of Port Angeles Wastewater Treatment
Plant (WWTP) accept and process up to 200,000 gallons ofbiosolids annually from their WWTP.
The City of Forks is unable to land apply their biosolids and treatment at the City of Port Angeles
WWTP is an interim solution. The Washington State Department of Ecology supports this
cooperative effort.
Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to sign an inter-local agreement with the City of Forks
to receive up to 200,000 gallons of biosolids annually at fifteen cent ($0.15) a gallon.
Background / Analysis: The City of Forks is unable to land apply biosolids from their wastewater
treatment plant because their designated lands are at capacity. They have requested that the City of
Port Angeles provide assistance by entering into an agreement to process their wastewater treatment
plant biosolids. Forks has been working with the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE)
to develop a long term solution to their disposal challenges. DOE has reviewed the request from
Forks and supports (see attached letter) the two cities working cooperatively to provide an interim
solution to the challenge.
The City of Forks has provided an analysis of their biosolids contents. It is very similar to the
biosolids processed at the Port Angeles WWTP and is within the levels allowed by our permit. The
additional biosolids can be processed at the City's WWTP with no detrimental effects on the system.
Biosolids disposal at fifteen cents ($0.15) per gallon covers the additional administrative, storage
and land application costs associated with the biosolids disposal. This is the same fee (previously
approved by City Council) being charged for processing biosolids from the Makah Tribe. The
proposed agreement is for a 3 year period with an option for a 2 year extension and a 90 cancellation
clause by either party.
This issue was brought before the Utility Advisory Committee at their February 12,2002 meeting
and they support this initiative.
Attach: City of Forks letter dated February 4, 2002
Department of Ecology letter dated February 8, 2002
25
N \TEMP\ForksCCMemo302. wpd
- ~ or FOR
0' ~
FEB 13 2002
City of Pori t.,,,.J' . ..i:S
.
P.O. Box 1998 · 500 East Division · Forks, Washington 98331-1998
(360) 374-5412 · Fax: (360) 374-9430 · Web: www.forkswashington.org
February 4, 2002
City of Port Angeles
Mr. Mike Quinn, City Manager
321 East 5th St.
Port Angeles, W A 98362
RE: Biosolids Disposal
Mr. Quinn:
The City of Forks is exploring options for the disposal of municipal biosolids from the
City of Forks wastewater treatment plant. One option to the treatment and disposal of
these biosolids is the transportation of them to an existing permitted facility for treatment
and disposal. This letter is our request to determine if the transportation of the biosolids
to the City of Port Angeles wastewater treatment facility for treatment and disposal is an
acceptable proposition to you.
.
The biosolids will be tested for contaminates in accordance to 40 CFR 503 and all test
information will be provided to the City of Port Angeles before any biosolids are
transported. It is projected that the City of Forks will produce 10 to 40 dry ton of
biosolids per year.
I appreciate your help in coordinating the various agencies involvement in the project.
The development of the treatment and disposal alternative has been coordinated with you
at the City of Port Angeles. the City of Forks and Department of Ecology. The City of
Forks contact is Utility Superintendent Dave Zellar (360)374-5412 or Danny Wahlgren,
lead wastewater plant operator (360)374-3124.
.
26
.
Request for Proposal:
The City of Forks needs to dispose of between 10 to 40 dry tons of biosolids per year
with an agreement to do so for 5 to 10 years. The City of Forks would arrange for the
transportation of the biosolids to your facility at a time convenient to your plant
operation.
The City of Forks would like to know if the City of Port Angeles is willing to accept the
biosolids into their treatment plant and if so what the conditions of the sludge acceptance
and costs associated would be.
Please advise the City of Forks at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions or
concerns regarding this proposal, please feel free to contact me at the above number.
.
City of Forks
.
27
01/11/1995 23:33
13604174841
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
FAX NO. 360407e~05
PAGE 02
P. O?
FEB-08-2002 FRl 10:18 AM DOE SW REGIONAL OFFICE
.
llTATf Of W,'\~HIN(;10N
DEPArC'I\\'~ENT Or t:COLOC Y
P.O. 1I0i 01.'''''5 ' O/ymjlr.l. WMnlfll!l'/(j1) 98504-.'7;1 . n/;o; 40;./:,)00
Fobru..ry 8, 2002
Mr Jet! Young
City ofPon Angeles Waste W~ter Treatment Pla.nt
J 21 E.st 5th Srreet
PO, Box 1150
Port Angeles, W A 98362-02]7
RE. Request for Approval of Acceptance ofBiosolids from th~ City of Forks. W8shln~O/l
Dear Mr. Young
The Departmefll ofEcoJogy (Ecology) is in receipt of your e-mall, dated febnlary 6, 20~12 If'l
this correspondence you requested a letter from Ecology supporting the IIcceptanct(\ of 2V dr,'
t.::lns ofbiosohds per year from the City of ForKS, In a subsequent conversahoJ'\ earller today. VOll
indiuted that a five-year agreement is being developed.
.
I have di~(;Ll5Sed thiS mllner wilh PllVld Dougherty from Ecology's Water Quality PrOF:fllm H~
i, the permit manager for water quality permits issued [0 both facilirl~s in question, Ecology has
no objectlOn$ and supports transfer ofbiosolids from the City of For~s to the Por1 M!;;eles \Va~;te
Water Treatment Plant
IfI may be offurther assistance, please con1aCl me at (360) 407-6383 If you have questions
peJ1aining to any water quahty concerns, ple.lise contact Mr Dougherty at (360) 407-6278
Sincerely,
~~/;~~
Chuck Matthews
Re.gional Solid WUte Specialist
Solid Waste & fiollnc1al AssIStance Pr':lgram
Ct: David ZeBu, City of Forks
l<yl~ DOT$e)" Slatt: Biosolids Coordinator
David Dougherty, ECY WQ
.
"",~;.t-- 'f
'i
28
.
.
.
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE:
PUBLIC CEREMONIES,
PRESENTATIONS AND
PROCLAMATIONS:
WORK SESSION:
Enckson Park "Super
Playground" Project
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
February 19,2002
Mayor Wiggins called the regular meeting of the City Council to order at 6:00 p.m.
Members Present:
Mayor Wiggins, Councilmembers Braun, Campbell,
Enckson, Headrick, Rogers, and Williams.
Members Absent.
None.
Staff Present.
Manager Quinn, Attorney Knutson, Clerk Upton, B.
Colhns, M. Connelly, G. Cutler, T. Riepe, Y. Ziomkowski,
T. Reid, S. McLain, T. McCabe, L. Dunbar, J. Young, and
G. Kenworthy.
Pub!zc Present:
L. Lee and T. Pnce.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Rogers.
None.
Erickson Park "Super Playground" Project: Parks & Recreation Director Marc
Connelly began by mtroducing members of a citizens committee who have been
instrumental in planning for replacement playground equipment for Enckson Park.
Members present were Jim Bolton, Kiwanis Club President-elect Janet Drysdale,
Chuck Drysdale, Dan MagUlre, Steve Charno, and Ray Gruver.
Jim Bolton, 101 West 12th, related his and Mr Maguire's research efforts regardmg the
design, costs, and SIZe of the eqUlpment, mentionmg other similar projects completed
in other cities m the U.S. Commenting on the existmg equipment wlthm the park, he
echoed Duector Connelly's "value-added" approach to improving Erickson Park and
indicated that thiS project would be a great addltJon as It would be a commumty-bUllt
and funded enterprise by volunteers. A video tape was shown With illustratIOns of other
simIlar playgrounds. The committee has set Fnday, February 22, 2002, as the design
day for the project when the architect, Leathers & Associates, will Visit local schools
and obtain feedback from Port Angeles children about what they would envision for
their playground.
Mayor Wlggms comphmented Mr. Bolton and volunteers for their efforts, stating that
thiS is a wonderful idea for Port Angeles and that there would be much enthusiasm for
the proJect. Following a brief question and answer session, Director Connelly indicated
the project would be under construction in mid-September.
29
- 1 -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 19, 2002
LATE ITEMS TO BE
PLACED ON THIS OR
FUTURE AGENDA:
FINANCE:
Acceptance of Septage
from Clallam County
Haulers
WP AG Annual
Agreement
KleinschmIdt Contract
Change Order
Morse Creek Waterhne
Repair
CONSENT AGENDA:
Mayor Wiggms added two items to be placed under Other Considerations: 1) the
meeting with the Elwha TrIbal ChaIT, added as Agenda Item 1.2, and 2) the Council
presentatIons to the Chamber of Commerce in March, added as Agenda Item 1.3.
.
1. Acceptance of Septage from Clal/am County Haulers
Public Works & UtIlitIes Director Cutler reviewed budgetary issues, procurement of
equipment, modIfication of the Wastewater Treatment Plant to accept addItIonal
septage, and LakesIde CorporatIOn's agreement to provIde a temporary septage
acceptance plant (SAP) for demonstratIon purposes. Followmg questions regardmg the
rate to be applied to County haulers and the profit structure for the City, Councilman
Braun moved to authorize the Director of Public Works & Utilities to accept
septage from Clallam County haulers for the period of February 20, 2002, to on
or about March 6, 2002, at the established rate of $0.11 per gallon.
Councilmember Erickson seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
2
WPAG Annual Agreement
DIrector Cutler summarIZed the City's partICIpation since 1980 in the Western Public
Agencies Group regardmg shared costs in contracting with experts in the regional power
field for legal assistance and financial consulting. In the dIScussion that followed,
CouncIlman Campbell noted that he ordinarily was not a fan of industry-wide groups
but, in this mstance, he observed this group has provided value to the membership over
the years. Therefore, Councilman Campbell moved to authorize the Director of
Public Works & Utilities to sign agreements with Marsh Mundorf Pratt and
Sullivan, and EES Consulting for WPAG services during the year 2002 for an
amount not to exceed $12,000.00. Council member Rogers seconded the motion,
which carried unanimously.
3
Kleinschmidt Contract Change Order
.
Background and analysis Issues were reviewed by Director Cutler relative to the need
for an evaluatIOn of the appropriate sale price for the Morse Creek Hydroelectric
Project. Staff had been directed to investigate options to sell and to lease the project.
Discussion ensued concerning the m-stream flow requirements under consideration,
after which Councilmember Rogers moved to approve and authorize the City
Manager to sign a change order with Kleinschmidt Associates to revise the total
compensation to their contract in an amount not to exceed $17,000.00.
Councilman Williams seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
4
Morse Creek Waterline Repazr
DIrector Cutler began by explaining the necessity of additional materIals and work to
complete the repair of the leak in the Morse Creek pipehne due to unanticipated soil
conditions and added Hydrauhc Permit Approval reqUIrements. Following Director
Cutler's summary, Councilman Campbell moved to approve and authorize the City
Manager to sign a change order with Morrison Excavating that revises the total
contract amount to $20,857.50. Councilman Braun seconded the motion.
DIScussion followed and, in response to an mquiry from Mayor Wiggins, Director
Cutler provided a brief status report on the lease with Ebey Hill. The most recent draft
lease agreement was forwarded to Ebey Hill, who indicated acceptance of the
agreement. The matter has not been brought before the Council, pendmg further
consideratIOn of the economics, the in-stream flows, and the report from Kleinschmidt..
A vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
.
Responding to concerns from Councilmembers Erickson and Headrick on Consent
Agenda Item No.7, Director Cutler clarified the costs and multi- year fundmg associated
30
- 2-
.
.
.
CONSENT AGENDA:
(Cont'd)
CITY COUNCIL
COMMITTEE
REPORTS:
ORDINANCES NOT
REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
Minimum Landfill Rate
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 19,2002
with the electric underground conversion on Ediz Hook.
Councilman Campbell referenced Consent Agenda Item No.6, noting the lack of
County involvement in the Olympic Coast Beach Cleanup. It was then requested by
CouncIlman Campbell that this issue be discussed with the organization and that they
be asked to approach the County for financial support of thIS effort. DIrector Cutler
stated that staff would follow up on this matter.
Additional discussion centered on the total contract amount for the Gateway
Transportation Center, followed by Councilman Braun's motion to accept the
Consent Agenda, to include the suggestion specific to Item No.6, as well as: 1) City
Council Minutes - February 5, 2002 Special Meetmg, and February 5, 2002 Regular
Meeting; 2) Check Register - February 12,2002 - $405,604.58; 3) Payroll Information-
February 3, 2002 - $452,673.18; 4) Electronic Transfers - February 8, 2002 -
$1,949,952.00; 5) Wastewater Treatment Plant Operating System and Software
Upgrade; 6) Olympic Coast Beach Cleanup; 7) EdlZ Hook Underground Project
Acceptance; and 8) Amendment #1 to Consultant Agreement for Port Angeles
International Gateway Transportation Center. Councilman Headrick seconded the
motion, which carried unanimously.
Councilmember Rogers attended the RC&D meeting with Jefferson and Clallam
Counties and served as a panelist for a technological discussIOn regarding
telecommumcations.
CounCIlman Headrick attended a Law & Justice Committee meetmg which dealt with
supplemental by-laws, revenues, and supervised community service work by
defendants.
Councilman Williams attended the RTPO meeting regarding the Hood Canal Bridge
closure and mentioned possible alternatives still under dIscussion.
Mayor Wiggins offered kudos on the successful demonstration of MagnaForce m
Olympia recently.
Minimum Landfill Rate
Director Cutler presented a summary on the background of fees, the increase in
workloads, and the increase in the number of self-haulers to the Landfill. The tipping
fees would remain the same, and only the minimum rate would increase. Director
Cutler noted the mcrease is an effort to reduce the number of trips to the Landfill. At
the request of the Utility AdVISOry CommIttee, the matter was referred to the Solid
Waste AdVISOry Committee who voted unanimously to recommend support of the
increase. Director Cutler then revIewed the results of a survey concerning the rates.
Tad Price, 111 Y2 West 12th, thanked the CounCIl for the opportumty to address Issues
regarding the mcrease in the landfill rate. Mr. Price posed questions to clarify and
justIfy the increase, questions explormg traffic issues, fundmg additional personnel, the
SlZe of the increase, additIOnal revenues to the City, and allocations for those revenues.
Mayor Wiggins thanked Mr. Price for his cogent questions and asked Director Cutler
to respond.
Director Cutler reiterated that the goal is a reduction of trips to the landfill so staff
would not have to be increased, adding that such a reduction would decrease the
workload. He went on to explam that annual rates should have increased in the past
years, but that new fees would be revenue neutral, adding that the number of staff is
mcreasing in association with the compost operations, not the rnumcipal solid waste
efforts. The increase in question is not to discourage trIpS to landfills, but to encourage
31
- 3 -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 19, 2002
ORDINANCES NOT
REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
(Cont'd)
Minimum Landfill Rate
(Cont'd)
RESOLUTIONS:
OTHER
CONSIDERATIONS:
Cable TV Franchise
Renewal
Meetmg with Elwha
Tnbal Chair
Council Presentations to
Chamber of Commerce
m March
PUBLIC HEARINGS -
QUASI-JUDICIAL:
PUBLIC HEARINGS -
OTHER:
INFORMATION:
fewer trips with larger loads.
Lengthy discussion followed, and Councilman Campbell responded to the matter of .
equity involved between City and County residents. Councilman Headrick inquired as
to how many City residents versus County reSIdents self-haul to the Landfill. Sohd
Waste Supenntendent McCabe indicated those figures were not currently available, but
he offered to provide those numbers to the CouncIl at a future date. CouncIlman
Headnck suggested the possibilIty of establishing a different mmlmum rate for City
reSIdents. The CouncIl then considered the merits of referrmg the matter back to the
UtIlity Advisory COmmIttee. Therefore, Councilman Braun moved that the
Minimum Landfill Rate issue be referred back to the Utility Advisory Committee
for further review. Councilman Headrick seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
None.
I.
Cable TV Franchise Renewal
Power Resource Manager Dunbar, at the request of DIrector Cutler, summarized the
issues mvolved in the renewal process and a waiver of the procedural reqUIrement under
federal law WhICh would allow for informal negotiations until the end of May of2002,
WIth the formal negotiatIons held in a delayed mode. Following questions from Council
and clanfication from Attorney Knutson, Councilman Braun moved to authorize
informal cable franchise renewal negotiations to continue through May of 2002
based on the Cable Operator's waiver dated February 6, 2002. Councilmember
Rogers seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
2. Meeting WIth Elwha Tribal Chazr
.
Mayor Wiggins reviewed a meetIng he and the City Manager had with Elwha Tribal
Chair Dennis Sullivan and John MIller and asked Council for any questions regarding
that discussion. The Mayor had previously e-mailed discussion topics and outcomes
to Councilmembers. No questIons were subrmtted by the CouncIl at this tIme.
3. CouncIl Presentations to Chamber of Commerce in March
Referencing upcoming meetings of the Chamber of Commerce on the 18th and 25th of
March, Mayor Wiggins asked that the Councilmembers identify topics for presentation
at the meetings m order to avoid duplicatIon. Councilman Headrick indicated he would
address the topic of Valley Creek, CouncIlman Braun wanted to discuss an ice skating
rmk, and CouncIlmember Erickson felt that she would speak to the subject of the pool
renovations. Mayor Wiggms urged the Council to gIve thIS further thought for
discussion at the next meetmg.
None.
None.
Manager Quinn announced a meeting of the Finance Committee on February 22, at
10:00 a.m. Mention was made of a conflict in dates for the Real Estate Committee
meeting and the Three Mayor Meeting with the March NLC meeting m Washington,
D.C. He furthered mentIOned a memo from Clerk Upton requesting a special meeting .
for Councilmembers to interview applicants for vacant board and commiSSIOn pOSItions.
The special meeting was scheduled for March 5,2002 at 4:00 p.m.
32
- 4-
.
.
.
Break
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
RETURN TO OPEN
SESSION:
ADJOURNMENT:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 19,2002
.111,.,/
Mayor Wiggins rec~~~ed the meeting for a break at 7:40 p.m. The meeting reconvened
at 7:50 p.m.
The meeting adjourned to Executive Session at 7:50 p.m. for 30 mmutes to discuss
litigation and potential litigation..
The meeting reconvened at 8:55 p.m.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
Glenn Wiggms, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
33
- 5 -
.
.
.
34
.
.
.
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
RETURN TO OPEN
SESSION:
Land Use Traming
ADJOURNMENT:
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
February 20, 2002
Mayor Wiggins called the special meeting of the CIty Council to order at 3 :30 p.m. The
meeting was held in joint session with the Planning Commission and the Board of
Adjustment for the purpose of receiving trammg from the Washington Cities Insurance
Authonty.
Members Present:
Mayor Wiggins, Councilmembers Braun, Campbell,
Erickson, Headrick, Rogers, and Williams.
Members Absent.
None.
Planning Commission
Members Present:
Fredrick Norton, Bob Philpott, Rick Porter, and Charles
Schramm.
Board of Adjustment
Members Present:
Barbara Gase, LOUIse Meyer, and Bill Rinehart.
Staff Present:
Manager Quinn, Attorney Knutson, B Collins, D. Dickson,
B. Coons, and S. Roberds.
The meeting adjourned to Executive Session at 3:30 p.m. for approximately one hour
to discuss pending and potential litigation..
The meeting returned to Open Session at 4:45 p.m.
Land Use Training: On behalf of the Washington Cities Insurance Authority, Mr.
Michael Walter conducted an education session, providing an overview of land use
liability issues, land use nsk management rules and techniques, and dIScussion of recent
court decisions regarding liabIlity issues created by land use decision makmg.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
Glenn WIggins, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
35
- 1 -
.
.
.
36
.
.
.
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Potential AcqulSltlOn of
Property
ADJOURNMENT:
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
February 26, 2002
The Real Estate Committee meeting opened at 4:00 p.m. The meeting also served
as a City Council meeting, because there was a quorum of Councilmembers present.
Members Present:
Mayor Wiggins, Councllmembers Braun, Headnck, and
Williams.
Members Absent.
Councilmembers Campbell, Erickson, and Rogers.
Staff Present:
Manager Quinn, Senior Assistant Attorney Dickson, S.
Roberds, and T. Funston.
Potential A cquisition of Property: The Real Estate Committee / City Council discussed
the funding and potentIal acquisition of property in connectIon with the future Valley
Creek restoration.
Upon completIon of the discussion, Councilman Headrick departed the meetmg which,
therefore, served as adjournment of the City Council meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 5:15 p.m.
Glenn Wiggins, Mayor
Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk
37
- 1 -
.
.
.
38
MEMO
FINANCE
DEPARTMENT
Yvonne Ziomkowski
Fmance Drrector
[4601]
Karen Asquith
Accounting Mgr.
[4605]
.carol Hagar
A Onistrative Assistant
[4600]
.
~I. ,or RI~T;~v NrG~ELES;
,.' }) ..:., .! ! I. I ."J ..r:..!! .._.!.. [_.1 lJ
I V .
-"_. ----- ---..
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
Date: February 22,2002
To: Mayor Wiggins and City Council
From: Lynne Bryant, Payroll Specialist
Re: Payroll Information for February 17, 2002
For February 17,2002, the payroll was $432,374.55. Overall the year-to-date
increase from 2001 to 2002 is 7.39%, however, there is no change in the
General Fund.
.
The position in Community Development was still vacant until the end
of February 28th.
· The City Attorney's office has an employee on leave.
Suggestions and comments are welcome.
39
PAYROLL INFORMATION AS OF FEBRUARY 02, 2002
Current Current Current Current 2001 2001 2001 Current 2002 2001 YTD.
Fund/Department for PP # 01 for PP # 02 for PP # 03 for PP # 04 for PP # 01 for PP # 02 for PP # 03 for PP # 04 TOTAL TOTAL VARIAN
01/06/02 01/20/02 02103/02 02117/02 01/07/01 01/21/01 02104/01 02118/01 YTD YTD $ %
General Fund
Mayor/CounCIl 2,950 00 2,950 00 2,850 00 2,850 00 5,900 00 5,700 00 200 00
City Manager (Adm,HR,Cleri<) 12,37987 12,34620 12,449 30 12,44930 11,60976 11,83690 11,83689 11,79072 49,624 67 47,07427 2,550 40 542%
Supenor PerformancelOPS 15420 154 20 15540 15540 15540 23310 308 40 699 30 (390 90) -55 90%
Finance 30,959 00 31,77512 30,408 98 31,00175 28,73377 30,683 41 31,34129 30,378 68 124,14485 121,13715 3,007 70 248%
City Attomey 8,256 53 17,764 47 8,41038 8,41038 18,01194 8,744 60 8,857 35 8,98787 42,641 76 44,601 76 (1,76000) -395%
Community Development 7,80552 8,18327 8,11696 8,10034 9,61905 9,234 76 9,098 03 9,204 36 32,206 09 37,156 20 (4,950 11) -1332%
Police Department 89,202 77 72,90575 71,20582 72,683 82 73,14256 66,12012 67,283 98 67,19286 305,998 16 273,739 54 32,258 62 1178%
Fire Department 52,041 17 53,386 99 59,091 86 53,535 24 49,249 84 52,19200 51,24105 50,867 89 218,055 26 203,550 78 14,504 48 713%
Pubhc Works and Utlhty SelVlces 36,76005 29,555 02 29.452 79 29,71030 30,18545 31,80599 30,378 78 31.43894 125.47816 123,80916 1,66900 135%
Pari< and Recreation 33,814 10 36,058 14 37,00858 34,689 94 30,221 67 35,936 58 36,898 23 35,872 39 141,57076 138,92887 2,641 89 190%
Facility Maintenance 3,509 15 2,81173 3,016 69 3,11583 2,64540 2,636 49 2,636 51 3,396 40 12.453 40 11,51480 938 60 815%
Total General Fund 274,882,36 267,890,89 259,16136 256,646 90 253,774,86 252,196 25 249,727.51 252,213.21 1,058,581,51 1,007,91183 50,669,68 (0.35)
Economic Development 2.483 00 2,529 36 2,529 37 2,529 36 2,38668 2.427 84 2.488 43 2.452 09 10,07109 9,75504 31605 324%
PenCom 28,57574 27,62974 28,14515 27,870 55 26,912 36 25,880 09 26,868 62 25,70855 112,22118 105,369 62 6,851 56 650%
Street 15,96600 15,51529 19,537 76 14,77526 14,67505 16,15223 14,71138 17,50398 65,794 31 63,042 64 2,751 67 436%
Recreation ActIVIties 1.404 36 2,055 98 2,231 74 2.494 38 1,03769 2,21101 1,85266 2.449 35 8,18646 7,550 71 635 75 842%
Electnc Utility Fund 28.422 66 37,55515 47,28820 47,79070 30,897 45 34,191 48 39,397 17 39,11478 161,056 71 143,60088 17.455 83 1216%
Water 20,87774 21,03963 20,239 18 20,069 40 18,664 13 17,79888 18,10899 19,61678 82,225 95 74,18878 8,037 17 1083%
Wastewater 15,21931 14,596 32 14,26827 14,77503 14,08061 13,292 73 13,539 40 13.445 05 58,858 93 54,357 79 4,50114 828%
Sohd Waste 24,307 18 23,298 40 39,555 17 25,549 03 21,31297 21,28682 21,50604 22,78066 112,70978 86,886 49 25,823 29 29 72%
EqUipment Services 8,577 58 8,569 78 10,19914 8,48564 8,287 06 8,709 12 8,70913 8,78529 35,832 14 34.490 60 1,34154 389%
Information Technology 6,485 62 6,604 24 6,61896 6,663 12 6,15506 6,261 28 6.41620 6.402 56 26,371 94 25,235 10 1,13684 450%
Firemen's Pension 2,006 15 1,82630 1,704 36 1,704 36 3,832 45 3,408 72 423 73 1243%
Esther Webster Trust 2,849 03 2,898 88 2,898 88 2,89888 2,920 24 2,758 88 2,758 88 2,758 88 11,54567 11,19688 348 79 312%
Total Payroll 430,050 58 432,18981 452,673 18 432,374,55 401,10416 404,870 97 406,084 41 414,935.54 1,747,288,12 1,626,995,08 120,293,04 7.39%
.
.
40
.
.
.
Fund
401 02-20-02
Finance Department
Electronic Payments February 08, 2002 - February 22, 2002
Avista January Power Purchase
184,735.20
C'\ WINNT\Profiles\Administrator\Personal\ Wires. wpd
41
.
.
.
42
02/02/25 -18: 18
.
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
001
.
.
68266
68267
68276
68294
68295
68300
68307
68344
68377
68399
68430
68437
68441
68449
68454
68455
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Vendor
Name
Battery Universe
Bawden, George
CDW Government Inc.
Davis & Stanton
Davis Instruments LLC
Dvorson's Food Svc Equipment
Fi rst Line LLC
Moore Medical Corporation
University of WA (Law Library)
V P Consulting Inc.
CarteGraph Systems Inc.
E . S . R . I. I nc .
First Line LLC
Grapplers Inc
ICBO (Int'l Conference of
Insight Direct Inc.
68467 Microflex (for gloves)
68474 Northern Tool & Equipment Co.
68521 WA State Patrol - WASIS
0001
68252 AVAYA INC
68254 Albertson's Inc.
68278 Camera Corner
68351 Olympic Paper Company
68355 Olympic Stationers Inc.
68359 Pacific Office Equipment Inc.
68364 Peninsula Daily News
68367 Port Angeles City Treasurer
68421 Advanced Travel
68485 Paymentech
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
02661
02660
03336
04318
04155
04405
06305
13063
21065
22123
03051
05188
06305
07342
09001
09085
13253
14461
23281
12215
01204
03044
15111
15030
16004
16012
03062
01090
16421
Description
Batteries
Reimburse cell phone deposit
Adobe Acrobat,Pagemaker
Laptop Thinkpad,battery
LCD moni tors
Uniform bars-Zappey
Solar radio transmitter
Stove
Latex gloves
Syringes
Photocopies
Laserfiche,NT Weblink 2 Scan
NT Weblink Scan software
Snapshot 2.E-Mail user license
Signview technical support
ArcGIS training class-Hale
Latex gloves
Litter pickup tool
Family residential codes
Switch,wire router, adapter
Backup cartridges
Hard drives,network switch
Latex gloves
Hood helmet
Criminal history-Clemens, W
Criminal history-Neely
Criminal history-Schlaffman
Criminal history-Clemens,J
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
City,Transit Gateway meeting
City Council refreshments
City Council refreshments
Photos
Photo processing
Paper cups,table cloth, forks
Dividers
Hammermill paper
NP6412F lease pe 10-31-02
Boards,commisions vacancies
Ord 3097-Vacate 3/4 Alley
Postage
Coons to Seattle 01-17
Headrick to Tacoma 1/16
Coons to Renton 02-01
~ick-meals
Airline tickets to D.C.-Quinn
February 25 2002
GL Code
Number
2370000
2391000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2370000
2295000
2295000
2295000
2295000
Total for Department
111 4210
113 4210
124 4210
111 3101
112 3101
112 3101
112 3101
113 3101
112 3101
112 3101
111 3101
111 4810
113 4410
124 4410
113 4210
113 4210
112 4310
113 4210
112 4310
111 4310
Page
Amount
70.35-
100.00
58.20-
131.81-
130.22-
3.69-
15.35-
300.53-
16.81-
14.35-
1.39-
492.00-
368.18-
91.02-
48.79-
65.60-
18.04-
11.81-
3.63-
31.19-
29.05-
101.13-
12.30-
17.38-
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
1,836.82-
39.05
39.05
19.52
31. 70
7.98
11.88
15.60
6.94
181.21
27.22
37.87
32.46
32.50
20.64
3.94
106.23
71.50
12.80
19.65
338.00
02/02/25-18:18
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
February 25 2002
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
Vendor
Number
68509 Terryberry
20002
0002 68251 AT&T Wireless Services 01404
68252 AVAYA INC 12215
68297 Diversified Resource Center 04052
68314 Cost co Credit Card Pmts 03261
68341 Microflex Inc. 13203
68351 Olympic Paper Company 15111
68355 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030
68364 Peninsula Daily News 16012
68367 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062
68391 Swain's General Store Inc. 19037
68398 United Parcel Service 210D5
68411 Xerox Corporation 24001
68421 Advanced Travel 01090
68424 Apex Credit Bureau 01433
68468 Mobile Music Unlimited 13181
68480 Olympic Delivery Service Inc. 15020
68485 Paymentech 16421
68486 Pitney Bowes Credit Corp 16127
68495 Radix Corporation 18004
68525 WFOA (WA Finance Officers Assn 23006
0003
12215
03069
68252 AVAYA INC
68282 Clallam Co District Court 1
Description
GL Code
Number
Conference-Quinn
Airfare to D.C.-Wiggins
Conference-Wiggins
Airfare to D.C.-Williams
PA Crabhouse-Williams
Conference-Williams
In dispute-Campbell
Imprint tooling charges
111 4310
112 4310
112 4310
112 4310
112 4310
112 4310
112 4310
113 3101
Total for Administration
02-02 AT&T 45946522 240 4210
02-02 AVAYA billing 201 4210
02-02 AVAYA billing 230 4210
02-02 AVAYA billing 240 4210
Copy Center services-January 205 4150
Binders,computer memory 205 3101
Tax audit program 230 4150
Greenbar paper 240 3101
Labels 230 3101
Binders,paper,folders,diskette 230 3101
Paper 205 3101
Hammermill paper 230 3101
Senior accountant job ad 230 4410
On-call cashier,meterreader ad 240 4410
Lacey site visit 201 3101
Water cut off key 240 3101
Battery 240 3101
January shipping charges 230 4210
DC230SLX lease pe 01-01-02 205 4530
Meter usage pe 01-01 205 4530
Ziomkowski Tukwilla 01-24 201 4310
Veldhouse to Sequim 12-20 230 4310
Asquith,Veldhouse Marysville 230 4310
Ziomkowski Leavenworth 01-16 201 4310
Year end adjustments 230 4310
Year end adjustments 201 4310
Year end adjustments 200 36981000
Business credit report 240 4150
Pager 240 3101
January delivery svcs 240 4150
Software demo refreshments 201 3101
Toner cartridges 240 3101
Mailing machine-1st Qtr 2002 205 4530
Monthly maintenance 240 4810
Accounting class-Possinger 230 4310
Total for Finance
~-~ AVAYA billing
Court costs-January
311 4210
312 5090
Page 2
.
Amount
375.00
368.69
375.00
457.50
190.00
375.00
156.18-
250.00
3,290.75
32.98
39.05
48.81
117.15
1,577.00
235.27
104.19
807.60
11.92
55.
7,57
37.87
106.01
267.38
8.12
10.25
3.25
65.04
458.29
535.49
35.80
10.00
83.80
145.19
12.80
12.80
.50-
27.05
64.91
105.25
21. 90
423.20
385.98
176.37
20.
14,302.39
68.34
5,964.00
02/02/25-18: 18
.
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
.
.
68356
68377
68398
68411
68421
68461
68527
68534
0004
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Vendor
Name
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
Ortloff Atty. at Law, Kimberly 15146
University of WA (Law Library) 21065
United Parcel Service 21005
Xerox Corporation 24001
Advanced Travel
LSP Publishing
Washington (DIS), State of
West Group
01090
12331
23111
23018
68251 AT&T Wireless Services 01404
68252 AVAYA INC 12215
68308 German, Robert G. 07065
68351 Olympic Paper Company
68355 Olympic Stationers Inc.
68364 Peninsula Daily News
68413 Zenovic & Associates
68421 Advanced Travel
68433 Collins, Brad
68454 ICBO (Int'l Conference of
15111
15030
16012
26216
01090
03083
09001
68498 Rockler Woodworking & Hardware 18460
68504 Seattle Times, The 19012
0005
68250 ASLET
68252 AVAYA INC
68258 Angeles Communications Inc
68262 Angeles Machine Works Inc.
68270 Blumenthal Uniforms & Equipmt
68278 Camera Corner
01444
12215
01069
01072
02047
03044
Description
Prof svcs pe 12-31-01
Photocopies
January shipping charges
DC220SLX lease agreement-Dee
DC220SLX lease agreement-Dee
Year end adjustments
Year end adjustments
Criminal law notebook
Laser printer
WA Digest 2002
WA Digest 2002
02-02 AT&T 44324994
02-02 AVAYA billing
Refund application fee-rezone
Refund application fee-rezone
Paper cups, table cloth,forks
Sticky paper
Boards,commisions vacancies
Ord 2723,vacate South 5th St
Determination ClallamCo COPA
Determination-Serenity rezone
Determination Dryke
Determination-German rezone
Corrected notice-German
Prof svcs-Black Ball pe 01-25
Year end adjustments
Reimburse Planning Comm pizza
Building certification
Family residential codes
Keyboard,platform
Associate planner ads
2002 dues-Swayze
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
Phone jacks,PVC,labor
Brass floor plugs
Holder-King
Tie,uniform jacket,emblems
Patch-Riepe
Shirt,emblems,zipper-Scairpon
Ties,case,holders-Scairpon
Shirts,creases-Scairpon
!i4i5i ng charges
Photos
February 25 2002
GL Code
Number
312 4150
311 4210
311 4210
312 4530
311 4530
311 4310
311 4310
312 3101
312 3101
311 3101
312 3101
Total for Attorney
420 4210
411 4210
411 34581014
411 34319000
411 3101
420 3101
411 4410
411 4410
411 4410
411 4410
411 4410
411 4410
411 4410
420 4150
411 4310
411 3101
420 4901
420 3101
411 4810
411 4410
Total for Planning
530 4901
511 4210
534 4210
530 4210
530 4150
530 4810
530 2080
530 2080
530 2080
530 2080
530 2080
530 2080
530 2080
530 4990
Page 3
Amount
1,395.00
18.39
1.83
239.03
102.44
5.20
10.40
93.54
779.22
134.44
134.43
8,946.26
18.68
39.05
450.00
101.84
17.16
4.87
97.50
30.96
57.62
46.44
50.74
50.74
48.16
240.10
12.80
57.00
60.00
47.88
159.66
331 .04
1,922.24
45.00
68.34
48.81
9.76
150.83
108.20
27.15
313.18
24.48
97.84
55.60
23.66
6.96
12.15
02/02/25- 18: 18
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
68294 Davis & Stanton
68304 Evergreen Towing
68315 Hansen's Trophy
68322 Jim's Pharmacy (Inc)
68340 Metrocall
68343 Middleton Auto and Truck Inc.
68355 Olympic Stationers Inc.
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
04318
03207
08047
10020
20000
13117
15030
68359 Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 16004
68363 Peninsula College 16011
68376 RadioShack Accounts Receivable 18003
68378 Richmond 2-Way Radio
18009
68382 Schilke, Ed 19258
68391 Swain's General Store Inc. 19037
68398 United Parcel Service 21005
68400 Verizon Wireless, Bellevue 01105
68405 Washington Fire & Safety Equip 23004
68412 Zappey, Erick C. 26002
68421 Advanced Travel 01090
68426 Bostec Inc 02653
68439 Eagle Auto Repair & Towing 05248
Description
Photos
Photo processing
Sl ides
Photo processing
Uniform bars-Zappey
Tow for PAPD-DeWater
Update awards
CPR shields
01-26 Metrocall billing
Car wash
Hammermill paper
Pens
Printer ink, letter opener
P-touch label maker
NP1020 lease pe 03-31-02
NP3050 lease pe 02-28-02
NP6230 lease pe 02-28-02
Computer crime evidence class
Pager
Micro recorder
Repair radio wiring
Resolder control joints
Radio repair
Reimburse tuition expense
Boots
Ziploc bags
Jacket
Insoles
Waist pack,power center
Athletic shirt-Swayze
Bookcase
Credit bookcase
Bookcase,plates
Trashbags,keyblank
Glue,propane
Storage containers
January shipping charges
January shipping charges
Calibrate radar
0113 Verizon billing
Extinguisher maintenance
Reimburse uniform allowance
Year end adjustments
Year end adjustments
Miller to Seattle 1-20
Kuch to Shelton 11-13
King to Shelton 12-09
Wood to Bremerton 01-03
Benedict to Seattle 01-25
~halizer repair
Impound-Murphy PD2002-0695
GL Code
Number
530 4990
530 4990
530 4990
530 4990
530 3111
530 4150
530 3101
530 3101
530 4210
530 4810
534 3101
530 3101
530 3160
534 3101
511 4810
534 4810
534 4810
530 4310
530 4810
530 2080
530 4810
530 4810
530 4810
530 4310
530 2080
530 3101
530 3111
530 2080
534 3101
530 2080
530 4810
530 4810
530 3501
530 3101
530 4810
530 3101
530 4210
534 4210
530 4810
530 4210
530 4810
530 2080
530 4310
530 4310
530 4310
530 4310
530 4310
530 4310
530 4310
530 4810
530 4150
February 25 2002
Page 4
.
Amount
60.50
13.71
71.07
5.92
48.69
67.63
12.98
21.70
111. 82
41. 88
151.48
13.54
87.49
30.30
32.46
54.10
167.82
50.00
21.63
43.2
21
32.
81.15
500.00
72.96
18.63
108.06
16.09
27.42
43.14
96.96
64.64-
44.56
8.19
15.67
16.09
50.65
20.23
208.56
116.30
16.23
500.00
13.00
13.00
518.28
138.
42.
8.50
12.80
168.32
378.70
02/02/25 - 18: 18
.
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
.
.
Vendor
Name
68445
68460
68479
68496
68502
68531
Gerrard's Bindery Inc.
LEIRA
Olympic Arms Inc.
Results Group Ltd., The
Satsop 24 Hour Towing
Washington (GA), State of
0006
68251 AT&T Wireless Services
68252 AVAYA INC
68266 Battery Universe
68270 Blumenthal Uniforms & Equipmt
68278 Camera Corner
68291 Curtis & Sons Inc, L. N.
68300 Dvorson's Food Svc Equipment
68307 First Line LLC
68316 Harborview Training Center
68326 Kitsap County EMS
68332 Larry's Janitor Service
68340 Metrocall
68343 Middleton Auto and Truck Inc.
68344 Moore Medical Corporation
68350 Olympic Laundry & Clnrs Inc.
68351 olympic Paper Company
68355 Olympic Stationers Inc.
68365 Pesek, Raymond
68368 Port Angeles Fire Department
68370 Port Angeles Power Equipment
68378 Richmond 2-Way Radio
68388 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware
68391 Swain's General Store Inc.
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
07163
12185
15131
18456
19864
23346
01404
12215
02661
02047
03044
03098
04405
06305
08425
1 1264
12040
20000
13117
13063
15026
15111
15030
16043
16025
16122
18009
19035
19037
Description
Police hard covers
Conference 2002-Zenonian
Sight tool
Sergeant's Academy-Lowell
Vehicle tow-Carnes
Divider panels, tables
02-02 AT&T 46898102
02-02 AT&T 47951801
02-02 AT&T 43736255
02-02 AT&T 45598455
02-02 AT&T 47190061
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
Batter i es
Batteries
Batteries
Shirts,emblems,pants,belts
Prints
Sprinkler stop valve
Stove
Latex gloves
BLS instructor fees
ACLS registration-Patterson
Janitorial svc-January
01-26 Metrocall billing
Bulb
Bulb
Syringes
Laundry services January
Paper cups, table cloth,forks
Post-it notes,pens,pads
Head set,pads,pens,diskettes
Cash box, penc i l s
Labels,tape,clips
Cash box
Software upgrade subscription
Reimburse petty cash
Reimburse petty cash
Repair generator
Cool ing fan
Portable radio
Oxygen cylinder rental
2 stage hydro test
Stowaway divider
.Ji te,holster
Ammonia
GL Code
Number
530 4990
534 4310
530 3101
530 4310
530 4150
530 3101
611 4210
643 4210
644 4210
642 4210
645 4210
611 4210
642 4210
643 4210
641 4210
643 3101
644 3114
644 3114
611 2080
642 3101
641 3101
684 4810
643 3199
643 4310
643 4310
684 4150
644 4210
641 3101
641 3101
643 3199
641 3101
611 3101
611 3101
611 3101
611 3101
611 3101
611 3101
641 3501
611 3101
641 3101
641 3101
641 3101
641 3114
643 3101
641 3501
643 3101
641 2080
684 3101
February 25 2002
Total for Police
Page 5
Amount
167.96
150.00
51.95
450.00
162. 19
59.84
6,385.34
8.31
35.41
8.31
14.89
218.79
48.81
9.76
9.76
29.29
250.29
328.20
349.86
141.52
29.01
86.15
3,965.53
221.81
200.00
125.00
395.00
14.71
2.79
8.13
189.35
70.03
17.16
50.06
47.13
25.83
31.61
16.15
46.00
19.80
45.31
40.12
11.40
900.00
35.90
157.92
8.59
32.29
2.53
02/02/25-18: 18
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
68395 Thurman Supply 20005
68400 Verizon Wireless, Bellevue 01105
68405 Washington Fire & Safety Equip 23004
68411 Xerox Corporation 24001
68421 Advanced Travel 01090
68441
68464
68485
68490
First Line LLC
Life Assist
paymentech
Port Angeles Fire Department
68503
SeaWestern Inc.
68520 WA State Patrol
68527 Washington (DIS), State of
0007
68252 AVAYA INC
68264 Angeles Millwork
68278 Camera Corner
68280 Cayenta Canada Inc
68286 Complete Line, The
68292 Cutler, Glenn
68314 Costco Credit Card Pmts
68351 Olympic Paper Company
68355 Olympic Stationers Inc.
68364 peninsula Daily News
06305
12202
16421
16025
19104
23057
23111
12215
01073
03044
14074
03087
03509
03261
15111
15030
16012
Description
Ballast tubes, lamp
01-15 billing 1032-5048873
01-15 billing 1032-603796
01-15 billing 1032-2097402
Extinguisher maintenance
DC220SS lease agreement-Dee
Ziegler to Renton 1-15
Year end adjustments
Year end adjustments
Year end adjustments
Year end adjustments
Gunn to Bellingham 10-25-01
Latex gloves
Backboard, imprinting
Lighting & electrical supplies
Pressurewash,business lunch
Off i ce suppl i es
Shut off cap,mask nosecup
Air pack flow test,diaphragm
Background check pe 01-31-02
Laser printer
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
Stakes
Prints
Photo processing
Custom software modifications
Map file sorter
Storage files,binders
Storage file,binders
Binders,tape,glue sticks,pens
Cleaner wipes
Pushpins,erasers,clibpboards
Legal pad,post-it,binder,file
Airfare pavement conference
Chair
Paper towels
Paper cups,table cloth,forks
Boxes
Phone center,folders,labels
Keyboard cl eaner
Rolodex,pens,markers
Hammermill paper
File folders
Asst Civil Engineer 01-13
~st letters of intent
Small works roster
GL Code
Number
684 3101
641 4210
641 4210
641 4210
641 3101
611 4530
641 4310
645 4310
611 4310
645 4310
645 4310
643 4310
643 3199
643 3101
684 3120
611 3101
684 3101
641 3501
641 3501
644 4410
611 3101
711 4210
711 4210
711 4210
711 3101
711 3101
711 4990
711 4150
711 3501
711 3501
711 3501
711 3101
711 3101
711 3101
711 3101
711 4310
711 6410
711 3101
711 3101
711 3101
711 3101
711 3101
711 3101
711 3101
711 3101
711 4410
711 4410
711 4410
February 25 2002
Total for Fire
Page 6
.
Amount
10.70
9.92
1.94
10.18
16.23
197.97
82.00
10.40
10.40
12.80
12.80
109.50
238.04
181.70
415.06
48.10
50.81
58.26
184.67
10.00
77.
10,699.21
19.52
19.52
224.56
10.99
6.55
7.17
4,200.00
223.34
161.39
511. 75
84.37
8.69
11.76
38.95
125.00
108.19
40.48
17.16
43.27
48.64
4.32
1~.
30.62
341. 27
98.04
54.18
02/02/25-18: 18
.
City of Port Angeles - [IVE MACHINE
Fnd Opt Check
Number
.008
.
Vendor
Name
68374 Qwest
68401 Viking Office Products
68411 Xerox Corporation
68421 Advanced Travel
68430 CarteGraph Systems Inc.
68437 E.S.R.I. Inc.
68469 Morrison Escavating Inc
68485 Paymentech
68504 Seattle Times, The
68517 Utilities Underground Loc Ctr
68537 Zee Medical Service Co.
68251 AT&T Wireless Services
68252 AVAYA INC
68253 Ace Equipment Company
68254 Albertson's Inc.
68258 Angeles Communications Inc
68261 Angeles Lock Shop
68262 Angeles Machine Works Inc.
68264 Angeles Millwork
68269 Blake Sand & Gravel Inc.
68287 Cornell Auto Parts
68301 Eclipse C Corp.
68312 Grainger Inc.
68324 Kaman Industrial Technologies
68335 Lincoln Industrial Corp.
68339 Matthews International
68350 Olympic Laundry & Clnrs Inc.
68351 Olympic Paper Company
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
21001
22054
24001
01090
03051
05188
13013
16421
19012
21010
26005
01404
12215
01055
01204
01069
12050
01072
01073
02045
03092
19019
07015
11082
12047
13664
15026
15111
Descri pt i on
02-05 Qwest billing
Magazine rack
Binders
DC420SX lease agreement-Dee
DC214S lease agreement-Dee
Year end adjustments
Year end adjustments
Adams to Tacoma 01-11
Hale to Olympia 1-14
Sperr to Puyallup 01-23
Signview technical support
ArcGIS training class-Hale
Truck,bulldozer rental,gravel
Morse Creek pipeline balance
Publications
Asst civil englneer ads
Underground locates-January
First aid supplies
02-02 AT&T 44704773
02-02 AT&T 46008926
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
Ring,gasket
Donuts
Repair corp yard link
O-ring, keys
Extended threaded fitting
Tape,wallplate
Ball va l ve, pvc
Plywood
Hammer
GL Code
Number
711 4210
711 3101
711 3101
711 4530
711 4530
711 4310
711 4310
711 4310
711 4310
711 4310
711 4530
711 4310
711 4150
711 4150
711 3101
711 4410
711 4150
711 3101
February 25 2002
Total for Public Works
865 4210
865 4210
811 4210
866 4210
865 4210
861 4210
862 4210
863 4210
865 3120
811 3101
830 4150
830 3120
830 3120
862 3120
cement,coupling 866 3120
866 3120
865 3501
865 3120
865 3120
865 3120
865 3120
866 3120
866 3120
862 3120
865 3120
865 3120
865 3120
866 3401
830 3120
862 3106
Vehicle blockades
Filters,rags
Mower parts
Rags,cups,sanding disc,filter
Sand
Screened sand
Shutter motor
Seals
Seals
Primer
Bronze plate-Irish
~
Toi let tissue
Page 7
Amount
42.66
49.82
340.98
341.47
71. 14
7.80
15.60
169.11
139.80
67.50
643.79
865.60
11,749.92
10,817.90
57.25
434.49
27.50
57.83
32,570.59
21.16
8.56
29.29
9.76
9.76
19.52
9.76
29.29
20.25
11.98
59.51
14.93
23.53
5.65
13.49
137.89
35.35
75.74
5.49
19.32
92.57
75.74
151. 48
72.02
22.95
13.62
13.61
66.00
33.00
93.05
02/02/25 -18: 18
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Fnd Opt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
68352 Olympic Sewer & Drain Cleaning 15169
68355 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030
68359 Pacific Office Equipment Inc.
68360 Pacific Office Furniture
68364 Peninsula Daily News
68366 Pettit Oil Company
68367 Port Angeles City Treasurer
68370 Port Angeles Power Equipment
68373 Quiring Monuments Inc.
16004
16518
16012
16302
03062
16122
17001
68374 Qwest 21001
68388 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware 19035
68391 Swain's General Store Inc. 19037
Descri pt i on
February 25 2002
GL Code
Number
Liners 865 3120
Paper towels/toilet tissue 830 3120
Toilet tissue/vaccuum bags 830 3120
Service call City Peir 865 4810
Dividers 865 3101
Cash register rolls,stamp/pads 866 3101
Diskettes,file 865 3101
Hammermill paper 862 3101
Fastners,pencils 811 3101
Folders,rubber stamps 866 3101
Adder rolls 862 3101
Service call copier 01-14 862 4810
Toner 861 3101
Desk,file 861 6410
40 Year anniversary ad 862 4210
Lessons,exercise class ad 862 4210
Water exercise ads 862 4210
Credit-kerosene 865 3120
Meeting coffee 811 3101
Refund-swimming lessons 862 34760013
Replacement parts for mower 865 3120
Nuts,bolts 865 3120
Oil 865 3120
Belts/spacer 865 3120
Belt 865 3120
Belt/footpad,spark plug,fender 865 3120
Mower replacement parts
Spring
Cement foundation-Smythe
Bronze marker-Mitchell
Unearned discount
02-02 Qwest billing
02-02 Qwest billing
Switch
Wire wheel,cup
Cylinder rent-January 2002
Cylinder rent
Gloves
Plungers
Cleanser
Knife/bulb
Tarp
Gloves, lens
Hose,rags,tissue,bags
Tax on invoice 281854
Starting fluid/protectant
Caulk gun,caulk
Cleaner
Chain/sinker
'5&sion cord
Rat trap
865 3120
865 3120
866 3401
866 3401
866 3401
863 4210
863 4210
865 3120
866 3120
865 3101
866 3101
865 3120
830 3120
865 3120
863 3120
865 3140
865 3140
862 3106
862 3106
866 3120
863 3120
865 3120
863 3120
865 3120
830 3120
Page 8
.
Amount
85.28
118.26
410.33
64.24
3.41
59.28
14.40
37.87
5.91
31. 71
14.07
40.58
63.84
719.10
38.00
50.00
165.67
20.50-
10.82
30.00
159..
12.
11.89
54.07
27.04
120.13
24.88
2.15
57.95
157.70
4.40
31.36
40.08
18.11
70.42
17.04
11.36
5.27
5.13
4.20
4.34
8.59
6.24
38.36
3.15
~.
9.39
4.58
8.08
7.37
02/02/25- 18: 18
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
.
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
Vendor
Number
Description
68395 Thurman Supply
Sprayer
Duct tape
Paint,bondo
Plant staking system
Sealer,brush,gloves
Tile cleaner,hook
Handheld spreader
Gloves,rakes
Batteries,flood lights
Bulbs
Bell reducer,nipples,plugs
Plug,valve,bolts
Tape,adapter
Post-its,folders,pencils,pads
DC220SS lease agreement-Dee
DC220SS lease agreement-Dee
Year end adjustments
Reimburse office supplies
Litter pickup tool
Hood helmet
Microphones
Ferns
20005
68401 Viking Office Products 22054
68411 Xerox Corporation 24001
68421 Advanced Travel 01090
68425 Bi lsborrow, Mari 02188
68449 Grapplers Inc 07342
68474 Northern Tool & Equipment Co. 14461
. 68507 Strait Music 19347
68533 Yayne's Nursery 23063
101 0001
68488 Port Angeles Chamber Of Comm. 16023
Visitor Center expenses-Feb
Marketing plan 2002
January expenses
Internet expense-2002,ads
February 25 2002
GL Code
Number
862 3106
865 3120
865 3120
865 3140
865 3140
865 3120
865 3120
865 3120
862 3120
865 3120
862 3120
862 3120
865 3140
863 3101
863 4530
811 4530
865 4310
861 3101
865 3501
865 3501
863 4810
865 3140
Total for Parks & Recreation
Total for General Fund
115 5083
115 5083
115 5083
115 5083
Total for Convention Center Fund
102 68451 Hall Signs Inc. 08125 Sign hardware 102 2370000
Total for Department
0007 68251 AT&T Yireless Services 01404 02-02 AT&T 43487438 752 4210
68252 AVAYA INC 12215 02-02 AVAYA billing 752 4210
68253 Ace Equipment Company 01055 Housing 752 3120
68255 All Phase Electric Supply Co. 01061 Transformer,freight 752 3120
Flex coupling 752 3120
68257 Alpine Products Inc. 01177 Melting,applicator unit 752 3120
68259 Angeles Concrete Products 01070 Concrete mix,truck time 752 3120
. 68264 Angeles Millwork 01073 Formica 752 3101
Foamboard,tape 752 3120
Felt 752 3120
Foamboard 752 3120
~lh,casing 752 3101
Toggles 752 3125
Page 9
Amount
11.76
2.67
14.62
7.43
65.67
10.86
9.71
64.68
30.90
3.02
149.51
75.90
10.25
267.57
197.97
197.97
15.60
67.77
155.75
229.34
194.73
1,164.50
7,044.23
83,324.19
4,569.46
4,108.65
5,873.39
1,516.80
16,068.30
55.60-
55.60-
12.79
29.29
18.34
86.33
113.61
1,632.00
233.98
49.08
51. 91
16.44
41.96
18.94
18.33
02/02/25-18:18
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Fnd Opt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
68269 Blake Sand & Gravel Inc.
68272 Brickie's
68286 Complete Line, The
68297 Diversified Resource Center
68317 Hartnagel Building Supply Inc.
68330 Lakeside Industries Inc.
68355 Olympic Stationers Inc.
68379 Ridout, Ken
68388 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware
68391 Swain's General Store Inc.
68395 Thurman Supply
68451 Hall Signs Inc.
68469 Morrison Escavating Inc
68483 Pacific Appliances
68497 Roadwise Inc
68518 Verizon Yireless, Bellevue
103 0001
68252 AVAYA INC
68359 Pacific Office Equipment Inc.
68364 Peninsula Daily News
68367 Port Angeles City Treasurer
68421 Advanced Travel
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
02045
02578
03087
04052
08052
12036
15030
18011
19035
19037
20005
08125
13013
16260
18459
01105
12215
16004
16012
03062
01090
Description
Mesh cloth, lags, washers
Bit
Lumber
Contact cement
Coarse screws
Plywood
Hex lag screws,flat washers
Bench grinder
Returned pallet board
Concrete mix,pallet board
Meals for callout
Legal pad,post-it,binder,file
Janitorial svcs-January
Extension cord
Asphalt
Markers,planners
Sheet protectors,binder
Mounting squares
Diskettes,pen
Hammermill paper
Reimburse mileage
Blade
Connector
Tool cache,straps
Nuts,bits
Yire
Cable
Lampholder
Bolts
Credit bike strobe
Credit batteries
Rain coat
Rings
Connectors
Electronic lamp ballasts
Sign hardware
Excavating,move logs
Used refrigerators
De-icer
02-05 Verizon billing
02-02 AVAYA billing
Toner
Boards,commisions vacancies
Chamber lunch
~~ to Tacoma 1-17
February 25 2002
GL Code
Number
752 3101
752 3120
752 3101
752 3120
752 3120
752 3101
752 3101
752 3120
752 3125
752 3125
752 4310
752 3101
752 4810
752 3101
752 3120
752 3120
752 3120
752 3120
752 3101
752 3101
752 4310
752 3125
752 3120
752 3120
752 3125
752 3120
752 3120
752 3125
752 3125
752 3125
752 3125
752 3120
752 3120
752 3120
752 3120
752 3125
752 4810
752 3501
752 3120
752 4210
Total for Public Yorks
Total for Street Fund
123 4210
123 3101
123 4410
123 4310
123 4310
Page 10
.
Amount
14.48
9.75
6.06
7.70
13.67
31. 79
1.95
75.62
15.00-
130.50
16.99
38.95
77.83
9.53
487.33
75.81
7.35
3.07
9.80
75.7
65
97.
5.13
26.43
41.07
149.32
90.89
6.05
27.05
2.16-
7.29-
35.57
5.75
5.37
21.94
733 . 60
757.40
149.50
1,590.07
11.62
7,211.88
7,156.28
6.
65.00
20.00
190.72
02/02/25-18: 18
, '~
~ ~/I" ~
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
February 25 2002
.
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Fnd Opt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
Vendor
Number
Description
GL Code
Number
Total for Economic Development
107 0005 68252 AVAYA I NC 12215 02-02 AVAYA billing 532 4210
68355 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030 Hammermill paper 532 3101
68359 Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 16004 Service printer-dispatch 532 3101
Toner 532 3101
Copier toner 532 4810
68374 Qwest 21001 01-23 Owest billing 532 4210
68421 Advanced Travel 01090 Year end adjustments 532 4310
68485 paymentech 16421 Travel expense-Wu 532 4310
Total for PenCom
174 0008 68251 AT&T Wireless Services 01404
68254 Albertson's Inc. 01204
68276 COW Government Inc. 03336
68314 Costco Credit Card Pmts 03261
. 68322 Jim's Pharmacy (Inc) 10020
68362 Peninsula Bottling Co. Inc. 16071
68367 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062
176 0005
68467 Microflex (for gloves)
13253
182 0005
68289 Cramer, Kala
68406 Washington State Treasurer
03314
23120
186 0008
68264 Angeles Millwork
01073
68269 Blake Sand & Gravel Inc.
02045
.
310 0001
68276 COW Government Inc.
03336
02-05 AT&T 49208770 888 4210
02-05 AT&T 49208598 888 4210
Chips, cups 888 3101
Movies 888 3101
Art supplies 888 3101
Adobe Acrobat,Pagemaker 880 3101
Binders,discs 888 3101
First aid supplies 8883101
Credit pre-mix beverages 888 3101
Fountain unit,pre-mix beverage 888 3101
Paper 888 3101
Total for Recreational Activities Fund
Latex gloves
531 3101
Total for D.A.R.E. Fund
Return of seized funds 536 36990000
2001 Drug seizure proceeds-10% 536 36990000
Total for Drug Task Force
Cleaner,sandbelt,sandpaper
Screws
Slot angle
Sandpaper
Snaps
Screws
Washers
Gloss black enamel
Blended soi I
873 3101
873 3101
873 3101
873 3101
873 3101
873 3101
873 3101
873 3101
873 3101
Total for Waterfront Trai I Fund,
LCD monitors
195 3160
53
Total for Administration
Page 11
Amount
350.40
165.96
75.74
128.87
92.51
157.97
60.50
5.20
672.52
1,359.27
12.04
9.47
8.32
6.14
13.84
526.16
107.98
60.39
75.00-
120.00
30.26
819.60
162.30
162.30
60.00
758.57
818.57
20.68
17.04
60.00
7.82
1.84
3.90
3.25
9.20
203.52
327.25
1,718.22
1,718.22
02/02/25 -18: 18
Fnd Opt Check
Number
0007
68278
68349
68359
68423
68494
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Vendor
Name
Camera Corner
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
03044
Olympic Electric Co. Inc. 15024
Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 16004
Aldergrove Construction Inc. 01286
Public Utility Dist Clallam Co 16038
0008
68462 Langley, Kenneth and Alice
401
68293 Darland, Chuck
68358 Pacific Metering Inc.
68434 Connelly, Dawn
68436 Washington (DOT), State of
68444 General Pacific Inc.
0009
68448 Glynn, Scott
68481 Owens, Leah
68524 WESCO Distribution Inc.
68536 Western States Electric Inc.
68251 AT&T Wireless Services
68252 AVAYA INC
68253 Ace Equipment Company
68255 All Phase Electric Supply Co.
12370
04398
16494
03645
23358
07034
07373
15225
23150
23025
01404
12215
01055
01061
Description
Photos
Photo processing
Traffic Signal Loops2115Afinal
Computer memory
Fire hall roof proj21-14 final
Utility agreement-Edgewood Dr
Pmt #3 Property acquisition
February 25 2002
GL Code
Number
783 3101
783 3101
792 6510
792 3101
783 6510
774 4150
Total for Public Works
896 6101
Total for Parks & Recreation
Total for Capital Improvement Fund
Stop pmt chg check #66827
Utility deposit rfd-124480010
Transformers
Transformers
Transformers
Utility dep rfd #081434042
Utility overpmt rfd 121878001
Transformers
Transformers
Transformers
Transformers
Utility overpmt ref 009341043
Utility deposit rfd 099341043
Utility overpmt ref 119015009
Utility dep refund 119015009
Clamps
Starter board
Battery pack,anchors,tape
Battery pack,anchors,tape
Copperweld,transformer pads
Copperweld,transformer pads
Nuts,washers
Transformer
Transformer
Freight charges
02-02 AT&T 44625127
02-02 AT&T 44690139
02-02 AT&T 45528387
02-02 AT&T 45570652
02-02 AVAYA billing
Chain,shapener
'54i t tester
Bolts,fixture,extension box
401 2391200
401 2391200
401 1414000
401 1411000
401 2370000
401 2391200
401 1222200
401 1414000
401 1411000
401 1414000
401 1411000
401 1222200
401 2391200
401 1222200
401 2391200
401 1411000
401 1411000
401 1414000
401 1411000
401 1414000
401 1411000
401 1411000
401 1414000
401 1411000
401 1411000
Total for Department
911 4210
911 4210
911 4210
911 4210
911 4210
911 3501
911 3501
911 3402
Page 12
.
Amount
5.60
6.76
1 ,799.00
94.03
21,586.79
153,292.70
176,784.88
31,000.00
31,000.00
209,503.10
8.00-
22.85
1,220.64
123.01
101.83-
~.
14,372.40
1,178.54
2,053.20
168.36
139.30
125.00
71.69
9.85
74.21
413.52
164.00
586.89
1,298.00
106.43
43.28
10,809.00
886.34
45.25
33,907.38
14.25
17.40
1a
1 ~ifIf
26.78
52.02
105 . 10
02/02/25-18: 18
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
.
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Fnd Opt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
Vendor
Number
68256 All Weather HeatingCooling Inc 01060
68269 Blake Sand & Gravel Inc. 02045
68274 Business Answerphone Service
68287 Cornell Auto Parts
02166
03092
68297 Diversified Resource Center 04052
68301 Eel ipse C Corp. 19019
68306 F i l t rex I nc 06276
68317 Hartnagel Building Supply Inc. 08052
68335 Lincoln Industrial Corp. 12047
68336 M & P Garage Doors 13100
68349 Olympic Electric Co. Inc. 15024
68351 Olympic Paper Company 15111
. 68355 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030
68366 Pettit Oil Company 16302
68367 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062
68370 Port Angeles Power Equipment 16122
68371 Potelco Inc 16537
68374 Qwest 21001
68376 RadioShack Accounts Receivable 18003
68380 Rohlinger Enterprises Inc. 18087
68383 Sears 19297
68388 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware 19035
.
68391 Swain's General Store Inc.
19037
Description
Thermostat adjuster
Concrete form
Concrete mix
February services
Connectors
Filter
Cleaner
Cleaner
Paint
Janitorial svcs-January
Concrete rubble
Concrete rubble
Filters
Tarp rope hook, shelf bracket
Bar grates
Garage door channel repair
Install service drop support
Paper towels,wipes,cleaner
Pop' up wipes
Cl ips
Tape,clips,literature holder
Credit-drum pump
Fi ling fee
Chainsaw
UG conversion-Ediz Hook
02-02 Qwest billing
Bridge circuit breaker
Telephone battery
Circuit seeker
Elbow covers, blankets
Vise, grinder
Receptacle
Grinder wheel,lens,soap stone
Adapters
Back-up rings
Drill bits
Lamp holder
Cut wheel
Hammer drill
Plugs,couplings,bushings
Drill bits
Drill bits,hex nuts,washers
Wire stripper,snips,screwbits
Screwdriver
Hasp
Expanding foam
Batteries
Ammunition cans
Tool caddy, parts cabinet
~pad,tarp
Wire connector
GL Code
Number
911 4810
911 3402
911 3402
911 4810
911 3402
911 4810
911 4810
911 4810
911 4810
911 4810
911 4810
911 4810
911 4810
911 3120
911 4810
911 4810
911 6510
911 3120
911 3501
911 4810
911 4810
911 4810
911 4990
911 3501
930 6510
911 4210
911 4810
911 4810
911 3501
911 3501
911 3501
911 3501
911 4810
911 3402
911 4810
911 3501
911 4810
911 3501
911 3501
911 3402
911 3501
911 4810
911 3501
911 3501
911 3402
911 4810
914 3501
911 3501
911 3501
911 3501
911 3402
February 25 2002
Page 13
Amount
41. 06
19.96
14.67
160.00
6.76
7.51
12.12
169.44
11.88
175.10
389.52
64.92
528.74
35.06
497.72
75.74
157.97
289.28
166.95
9.09
21.35
34.53-
88.00
497.67
20,273.64
64.92
2.04
10.81
464.68
2,835.14
188.24
10.38
22.00
7.40
20.10
48.38
10.03
27.89
324.59
9.12
50.75
24.98
44.22
4.64
2.35
10.76
24.18
8.52
39.16
11.62
5.84
02/02/25-18: 18
Fnd Opt Check
Number
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Vendor
Name
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
68392 Tacoma Screw Products Inc. 20191
68395 Thurman Supply
68398
68402
68403
68411
68418
United Parcel Service
Virginia Transformer
Washington (Ecology),
Xerox Corporation
22121
State of 23104
24001
AT&T Wireless Services
68420 Ackley Tool Co.
68421 Advanced Travel
68438
68444
68456
68465
68466
68472
68475
68485
EES Consulting Inc.
General Pacific Inc.
Ireland, David H
Marsh Mundorf Pratt & Sullivan
Metropolitan Communications
NWPPA
Northwestern Territories Inc.
paymentech
20005
21005
01404
01008
01090
05140
07034
09133
13287
13568
14013
14017
16421
68489 Port Angeles City Light 16083
68491
68493
68494
Port Angeles Marine Supply
Public Power Council
Public Utility Dist Clallam Co
16103
16118
16038
68508 TOT Inc. 20133
68511 TriAxis Engineering Inc 20274
68524 WESCO Distribution Inc. 23150
68529 Washington (DRS), State of 23141
68536 Western States Electric Inc. 23025
Description
Screwdrivers
Fl at washers
Flat washers
Ground fault receptacle
Step ladder
January shipping charges
January shipping charges
January shipping charges
Substation retainage 5%
Morse Creek annual use permit
DC220SS lease pe 11-30-01
DC220SS lease agreement-Dec
02-05 AT&T a/c 48555460
02-05 AT&T a/c 49335938
Undergrnd line locator repair
Year end adjustments
Smith to Spokane 11-6
Oman to Renton 01-23
Prof svcs-January
Duct sealant
Reimburse personal mileage
WPAG 2002 pe 01-31
Community Telecom Planning 2
Membership dues 2002
Safety training-Ireland
Prof svcs-Albert St pe 01-20
Publications
Publications
Gas
Connector
Elbow
Ferry tickets
Plugs
Search light
Assessment 2002
02-11 billing SR101 & Euclid
01-29 billing 2110 Glass Road
02-15 billing Golf Course Rd
Lab fees
Prof svcs-proj20-03 I Street
Prof svcs #21-27 Laurel St
Battery pack,anchors,tape
Statewide Pensioners January
Copperweld,transformer pads
Brace
Manuals
Manual
Seals
Jumper hanger
~6 gauge
Adjustable slings
February 25 2002
GL Code
Number
911 3501
911 3402
911 3402
911 4810
911 3501
911 4210
911 4210
911 4810
930 6510
911 4990
911 4530
911 4530
911 4210
911 4210
911 4810
911 4310
911 4310
911 4310
911 4901
911 3501
911 4310
911 4901
915 4150
911 4901
911 4310
911 4150
915 3101
915 3101
911 4310
911 4810
911 4810
911 4310
911 4810
911 3501
911 4901
911 3350
911 3350
911 3350
930 4150
930 4150
930 4150
911 3501
911 2030
911 3402
911 3402
911 3101
911 3101
911 3402
911 3501
911 3501
911 3501
Page 14
.
Amount
9.56
37.47
37.46
10.27
78.99
7.85
5.92
9.06
16,147.24
100.08
323.56
277.97
58.16
2.63
620.55
.50
271.98
320.66
439.41
498.
47
682.
6,067.70
12,680.00
1,592.76
2,219.00
4.00-
60.00
18.50
.64
.97
25.00
1.49
1,399.46
15,421.00
15.83
98.96
17.70
66.00
17,931.42
10,333.90
1,245.49
200.16
305.73
~~A
98~
259.68
249.65
205 . 14
106.08
02/02125-18: 18
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
February 25 2002
.
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
Vendor
Number
68537 Zee Medical Service Co.
26005
402
68288 Correct Equipment
68305 Familian NW
03600
06020
68321
68422
Industrial Chem Labs & Svcs
Agri Drain Corporation
09140
01529
0007 68251 AT&T Wireless Services 01404
. 68252 AVAYA INC 12215
68255 All Phase Electric Supply Co. 01061
68258 Angeles Communications Inc 01069
68259 Angeles Concrete Products 01070
68260 Angeles Concrete Pumping Inc. 01038
68261 Angeles Lock Shop 12050
68264 Angeles Mi llwork 01073
.
68269 Blake Sand & Gravel Inc.
02045
Description
GL Code
Number
Freight charges
First aid supplies
911 3402
911 3120
Total for Light
Total for Light Fund
Angle brackets
Valve box tops
Valve box tops
Repa i r cl amps
Repair clamps
Coupl ings
Use tax
Rat guards
402 2370000
402 1414000
402 1411000
402 1414000
402 1411000
402 1414000
402 2370000
402 2370000
Total for Department
02-02 AT&T 46031977 753 4210
02-02 AT&T 43263680 753 4210
02-02 AVAYA billing 754 4210
02-02 AVAYA billing 753 4210
Washers 753 3402
Disconnect switch,fuses 753 3402
Cable grip connector 754 3402
Fix extension 4845 754 4210
Line repair, labor 753 4210
Concrete mix 754 3120
Concrete 754 3120
Padlock keyed 753 3402
Visqueen 753 3402
Square edge,lumber,bit,screws 754 3120
Credit square edge, lumber 754 3120
Nails,zink strip 753 3402
Lumber,coupling,elbow,adapter 753 3402
Masonry bit 753 3402
Tape measure,connector,fitting 753 3402
Rebar 754 6510
Rebar 754 6510
Duct tape, drop cloth 754 6510
Credit rebar 754 6510
Tape measure 754 6510
Visqueen 754 3120
Screws 753 3402
Lumber,nails 753 3402
Tape 753 3120
Drip cap 753 3402
Screws, snap locks 753 3402
Concrete 753 3402
~~ete mix 753 3402
Joints,ties,rebar,bricks 754 6510
Page 15
Amount
44.37
90.62
119,566.25
153,473.63
15.07-
128.80
10.56
314.79
43.12
229.82
37.64-
3.37-
671.01
28.08
25.14
19.52
9.76
3.12
179.90
1.08
59.51
59.51
1,465.57
353.81
63.75
22.61
229.29
122.54-
69.82
9.85
15.34
27.74
267.73
16.62
16.73
96.00-
9.73
45.23
1.62
74.33
34.93
18.11
46.61
36.68
50.85
237.72
02/02/25-18: 18
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Name
68283 Clallam Co Util Coord Council
68286 Complete Line, The
68288 Correct Equipment
68290 Crystal Decisions Inc
68295 Davis Instruments LLC
68297 Diversified Resource Center
68298 Dobson's
68302 Edge Analytical
68305 Familian NW
68312
68317
68321
68324
68331
68335
68340
68343
68347
68350
68351
Grainger Inc.
Hartnagel Building Supply Inc.
Industrial Chern Labs & Svcs
Kaman Industrial Technologies
Lancy Construction Inc.
Lincoln Industrial Corp.
Metrocall
Middleton Auto and Truck Inc.
Olympic Air Pollution Cont Aut
Olympic Laundry & Clnrs Inc.
Olympic Paper Company
68353 Olympic Springs Inc.
68355 Olympic Stationers Inc.
68359 Pacific Office Equipment Inc.
68360 Pacific Office Furniture
68361 Papandrew, Karen E
68366 Pettit Oil Company
68367 Port Angeles City Treasurer
68370 Port Angeles Power Equipment
Vendor
Number
03021
03087
03600
03635
04155
04052
04054
05223
06020
07015
08052
09140
11082
12212
12047
20000
13117
15017
15026
15111
15029
15030
16004
16518
16568
16302
03062
16122
Description
Blocks
Concrete bricks
Knee boards
Adapter,trowel
2002 member dues-Ridout
Legal pad,post-it,binder,file
Angle brackets
Crystal reports CD rom
Solar radio transmitter
Janitorial svcs-January
Belts
Belts
Acid tests
Elbows
Valve box lids
Rubber gasket,nuts,bolts
Remote read unit
Stamps,filters
Angular broom,work gloves
Degreaser,shipping
Electric motor
Flash perimeter-Elwha PumpSta
Anchor bolts,angle plates
01-26 Metrocall billing
Grease,hose
Review fee for generator
Rags
liquid chlorine
Paper towels,toilet tissue
Deodorizer
Bulbs,paper towels,chlorine
Water
Cooler rental
Water
Adder paper
Pens,sheet protectors
Pens
Binders,pens
Cl ip board
Diskettes,pen
Diskettes, pen
Hammermill paper
Paper,pens,binder,notebooks
Ink cartridges
Chair
Prof svcs-Elwha,CIP,job cost
Diesel
Pizza-safety committee
L&I meeting refreshments
~~plugs,couplers,gaskets
Bands,coupler
February 25 2002
GL Code
Number
754 3120
754 6510
754 3120
754 6510
753 4901
753 3101
754 3120
754 3160
794 3101
753 4810
754 3120
754 3120
753 4810
754 3120
753 3402
754 3120
753 3402
754 3120
754 3120
754 3120
754 3120
753 4810
754 3120
754 4210
753 3402
754 4150
753 3402
753 3105
754 3120
753 3150
793 6510
754 3120
754 3120
754 3120
753 3101
754 3101
754 3101
753 3101
793 3101
754 3101
753 3101
753 3101
754 3101
754 3101
754 3120
793 4150
754 3211
754 4310
753 3101
753 3402
753 3402
Page 16
.
Amount
116.86
10.28
117 . 94
35.33
25.00
38.95
198.82
43.17
202.63
77.83
54.22
11. 03
1,070.00
148.40
68.17
73.78
301.41
346.09
11.66
496.5
209
865.
636.79
87.52
17.97
300.00
41.12
357.93
257.35
12.23
112.81
11.36
21.53
11.36
9.68
34.35
31.84
59.13
1.99
9.81
9.81
75.75
95.57
155.81
53.95
2,250.
455
23.07
29.94
278.26
17.26
02/02/25-18: 18
.
'd
Ii ' ~,J .
City of Port Angeles - Llv~ MACHINE
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
.
.
Vendor
Name
68372 Power Quality Equipment Inc
68374 Qwest
68388 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware
68391 Swain's General Store Inc.
68395 Thurman Supply
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
16510
21001
19035
19037
20005
Description
Electrical contactor
02-02 Qwest billing
02-02 Qwest billing
Repair
Bolts,tap
Strap, shackle
Batteries,oil
Tape measure
Paint,chalk line reel,chalk
Gloves,drill set,flashers
Brass tee
Bushing
Tool cache,bushing
Coupler,nipple
Heater
Connector,safety valve
Rope,shackle
Cap
Ear plugs
Clamp
Spray bottles
Cable tie,hammer,ice melter
Wrench,extractors,drill bits
Camlocks,suction hose
Fitting tape,buckle
Batteries,tape,pen,ice
Tape measure
Keys,cup hook,highlighter
Plunger
Hose
Hosees,coupling
Gloves,glue
Batteries,tape,hitchpin,screws
Ladder,heater
Hand warmers
Cleaner,batteries,bulbs,gloves
Trash cans
Sledge,plier,ratchet,hammer
Heater,wastebasket,brooms
Electric engraver
Screwdrivers
Batteries
Paper tags, key ring
Solder,extension cord
Pipe cap
Pipe,plug,tee,coupling
Outlet,drain valve
Conduit, adapters, gaskets
Bulbs
~kler,surge protector
Conduits,connectors,tees,nuts
GL Code
Number
754 3120
754 4210
754 4210
754 3120
753 3402
754 3120
753 3402
753 3402
754 3120
753 3120
753 3402
753 3402
753 3402
753 3402
753 3402
753 3402
754 3120
753 3120
753 3402
753 3402
753 3120
754 3120
753 3402
754 3120
754 3120
754 3120
753 3120
753 3120
754 3120
753 3402
753 3402
754 3120
754 3120
753 3402
753 3120
754 3120
753 4810
754 3120
753 3120
754 3120
754 3501
793 6510
753 3120
753 3402
754 3120
754 3120
754 3120
753 3402
754 3120
793 3501
753 3402
February 25 2002
Page 17
Amount
588.61
40.32
40.32
40.61
36.93
35.02
10.34
19.47
61.60
170. 16
16.22
1.40
8.36
35.02
50.52
17.18
17.16
19.43
37.86
15.35
13.57
25.17
12.94
263.49
14.23
178.01
10.03
9.24
4.19
47.47
106.93
47.93
22.71
129.56
41.98
138.98
70.57
68.12
113 . 26
10.79
9.82
9.64
7.33
16.85
5.68
18.02
3.79
17.97
4.21
20.44
47.93
02/02/25-18: 18
Fnd Opt Check
Number
68396
68397
68398
68400
68404
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
February 25 2002
Vendor
Name
Transfac Funding Corporation
Ultrablock Inc
United Parcel Service
Verizon Yireless, Bellevue
Yashington (Ecology), State of
68414 A & A Appliance Service Inc.
68416 AABCO Barricade Company Inc
68422 Agri Drain Corporation
68429 Brown and Caldwell
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
20059
21102
21005
01105
23106
01002
01475
01529
02057
68435 Yashington (DOH), State (ABC) 23117
68450 Hach Company
68463
68482
68483
68487
68492
68494
68499
68501
Larry's Excavation
PNPCA,Olympic Section
Pacific Appliances
Pors, Thomas M
Preston Gates & Ellis LLP
Public Utility Dist Clallam Co
S & B Inc.
Sanderson Safety Supply Co.
08124
12110
16267
16260
16575
16175
16038
19040
19048
68517 Utilities Underground Loc Ctr 21010
68522 YA Yater Utilities Council
68528 Yashington (DOH), State of
23061
23107
Description
GL Code
Number
Bushing,hose connector 753 3402
Coupling,cap 754 3120
Tubes,tube guard 793 6510
Ballast tubes, lamp 754 4810
Knife,brushes,roof cement 753 3402
Clamps, fasteners 753 3402
Yall heater, thermostat 753 3402
Brass nipples, bushings 753 3402
Electronic lamp ballasts 753 3120
Electronic lamp ballasts 754 3120
Connector,conduit 753 3402
Conduit 753 3402
Freight chgs on pumps 754 3120
Concrete blocks 754 3120
January shipping charges 754 4210
01-15 billing 1032-1617934 754 4210
Certification renew-Richmond 754 4901
Stormwater workshop-Sperr 794 4310
Motor 753 3402
Safety vests 753 3501
Rat guards 754 3120
YY projects pe 01-25 794 4150
YY projects pe 01-25 794 4150
Kenyon 753 4901
Beverford 753 4901
Johnson 753 4901
Messinger 753 4901
Siebens 753 4901
Yater testing chemical set 754 3120
Mixing cylinder,flask,stopper 754 3120
Flask 754 3120
Yater test equipment 754 3120
Yater testing chemical set 754 3120
Glass stopper 754 3120
Mixing cylinder 754 3120
Credit water testing supplies 754 3120
Downspout roof drain excavate 754 4810
Install culverts 754 4810
Yater Env School-Richmond, Ray 754 4310
Used refrigerators 753 3501
Prof svcs pe 01-21 793 4150
Elwha Legislation pe 12-31 793 4150
02-08 billing 203 Reservoir Rd 753 4710
SCADA System progress payment 793 6510
Absorbent pads,booms 753 3402
Eye wash,pressure gauge 753 3402
Gloves 754 3120
Underground locates-January 753 4150
Underground locates-January 754 4150
?6€)dues 753 4901
Kenyon 753 4901
Page 18
.
Amount
5.13
5.19
16.40
10.70
23.13
7.23
159.43
9.22
21.95
21. 94
7.79
7.79
308.58
600.52
9.16
19.93
30.00
180.00
53.88
143.19
44.
9,610
2,701.29
35.00
35.00
35.00
35.00
35.00
369.29
383.14
20.90
32.63
369.29
16.83
24.98
369.29-
2,164.00
2,705.00
375.00
402.50
623.50
813.02
11.31-
2,554.62
341.92
8.
18
13.7
13.75
500.00
64.00
02/02/25-18: 18
.
Fnd Opt Check
Number
404
.
.
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Vendor
Name
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
68530 Washington (Ecology), State of 23106
68532 Washington/Oregon Culvert Inc 23391
68422 Agri Drain Corporation
68484 Parts Incorporated
0007
01529
18126
68252 AVAYA INC
68264 Angeles Millwork
68265 Automotive Environmental Svcs
68286 Complete Line, The
12215
01073
01041
03087
68297 Diversified Resource Center 04052
68328 L & S Tire Company 12396
68350 Olympic Laundry & Clnrs Inc. 15026
68355 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030
68359 Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 16004
68364 Peninsula Daily News 16012
68374
68378
68388
68391
68393
68395
68422
68427
68446
68452
68457
68470
68483
68484
Owest
Richmond 2-Way Radio
Sunset Do-It Best Hardware
Swain's General Store Inc.
TaylorSparks Refrigeration
Thurman Supply
Agri Drain Corporation
Brockopp, Mike
Glacier Environmental Svcs
Hermann Bros. Inc.
Jim's Trophies
Mt Pleasant Country Supply
Pacific Appliances
Parts Incorporated
21001
18009
19035
19037
Inc 20290
20005
01529
02534
Inc 07223
08127
10007
13521
16260
18126
68515 USDA, APHIS,Wildlife Services 21069
68530 Washington (Ecology), State of 23106
Description
February 25 2002
GL Code
Number
Beverford 753 4901
Johnson 753 4901
Messinger 753 4901
Siebens 753 4901
Operating permit,certification 753 4990
WW permit pe 06-30-02 754 4990
Galvanized pipe 753 6510
Total for Public Works
Total for Water/Wastewater Fund
Rat guards
Joystick control
Joystick
02-02 AVAYA billing
Screws, snap locks
Antifreeze processing
Pushpins,erasers,clibpboards
Legal pad,post-it,binder,file
Janitorial svcs-January
Recycle tires
Laudry services-January,mats
Laudry services-January,mats
Laundry svcs-Nov a/c 353
File sorter,pens,white out
Notebooks,stencils
Ink roll,canned air duster
90 gallon trash cans ads
Holiday ads
02-05 Owest billing
Mobile radio
Clevis hook
Brush,handle
Remove refrigerant,compressor
Knife,hose adapter,bushings
Electronic lamp ballasts
Rat guards
Reimburse CDL license
LF Closure final pmt #8
Grind waste wood
Engraved clock plaque
Posts,wire
Used refrigerators
Joystick control
Joystick
P~l svcs-Wildlife strike haz
WW permit pe 06-30-02
404 2370000
404 2370000
404 2370000
Total for Department
755 4210
755 3120
755 4810
755 3101
755 3101
755 4810
755 4810
755 4990
755 3120
755 4990
755 3120
755 3120
755 3120
755 4110
755 4110
755 4210
755 4810
755 3120
755 3120
755 4810
755 3120
755 3120
755 3120
755 4310
795 4150
755 4810
755 3101
755 4810
755 3120
755 4810
755 4810
755 4150
755 4990
Page 19
Amount
64.00
64.00
64.00
64.00
5 , 781. 70
6,271.75
1,319.36
55,494.79
56,165.80
6.19-
68.04-
96.37-
170.60-
48.81
46.62
100.00
11.76
38.96
194.54
750.00
77.52
33.00
76.52
53.50
6.79
48.47
117.50
258.50
84.21
508.54
12.54
14.76
811. 50
34.91
21. 94
81. 73
82.00
31,798.97
8,244.84
183.02
394.28
187.01
897.72
1,271.65
17,382.39
5,172.00
02/02/25-18: 18
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
421 0009
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
68248 Can-Do Construction 03643
68256 All Weather HeatingCooling Inc 01060
68268 Becker, Edward
68271 Boston, Randy
68275 C & F Insulation
68276 CDW Government Inc.
68279 Can-Do Construction
68281 Chatman, Dolores
68284 Clayton, Donald
68309 Glass Services Co. Inc.
68320 Hebert, Harry
68323 Juskevich, Holly
68327 Kono, Irene
68338 Mathews, James V
68386 Stephens, David
68394 Throop, Dean
68407 Weller, Jeffrey
68408 Wilmot, Art
68409 Wirt, Will
68415 A & J Glass Inc
68447 Glass Services Co. Inc.
68458 Koehler, Sheldon
68459 Konrad, Patty
68485 Paymentech
68500 Sabol, Joyce
68510 Thomas, Chris
501
68311 Grafix Shoppe CIne)
68366 Pettit Oil Company
68484 Parts Incorporated
0007
68252 AVAYA INC
68255 All Phase Electric Supply Co.
68273 Bryant's Upholstery
68277 Schuck's
R0213
R0214
03102
03336
03643
R0215
R0216
07037
R0217
R0218
R0219
R0220
R0221
R0222
R0224
R0225
R0223
01511
07037
R0226
R0227
16421
R0228
R0229
07116
16302
18126
12215
01061
02059
19008
Description
City Rebate Program-Jacobson
City rebate program-Gochnour
City rebate program-Jacobson
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program-Yokota
City rebate program-Yokota
Adobe Acrobat,Pagemaker
City Rebate Program-Smith
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program-Gore
City rebate program-Cameron
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program-Peterson
City rebate program-Bishop
City rebate program
City rebate program
Awards poster contest
City rebate program
City rebate program
Decals
Bulk oil
Diesel
Gasoline
Diesel
Diesel
Coordinator board
Touch pad
02-02 AVAYA billing
Bolts,fixture,extension box
P6!r driver's seat
Floor mats
February 25 2002
GL Code
Number
Total for Public Works
Total for Solid Waste Fund
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 3101
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4410
913 4986
913 4986
Total for Conservation Fund
501 2370000
501 1412000
501 1412000
501 1412000
501 1412000
501 1412000
501 2370000
501 2370000
Total for Department
760 4210
760 3402
760 4810
760 3402
Page 20
.
Amount
69,046.50
68,875.90
450.00
1,585.00
1,855.00
55.00
150.00
645.00
645.00
241. 77
162.30
55.00
62.00
645.00
805.00
55.00
25.00
62.0
25
150.
172.00
62.00
50.00
100.00
807.50
812.50
35.00
150.00
325.00
43.27
150.00
10,380.34
11.61-
1,249.32
3,045.00
2,600.00
260.86
1,005.30
10.74-
27.69-
8, 110.
9.76
104.04
102.79
157.66
02/02/25- 18: 18
.
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
.
.
Vendor
Name
68285 Clyde/West Inc.
68286 Complete Line, The
68287 Cornell Auto Parts
68296 Denver's Tire Co. Inc.
68297 Diversified Resource Center
68303 Evergreen Collision and
68311 Grafix Shoppe (Inc)
68313 H & R Parts & Equipment Inc.
68319 Heartline, The
68324 Kaman Industrial Technologies
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
03100
03087
03092
04044
04052
05000
07116
08045
08054
1 1082
Description
Throttle actuator
Legal pad,post-it,binder,file
Spark plugs
Automotive parts
Mini torch
LOF
LOF
LOF
LOF
LOF
LOF
LOF
LOF
Wiper refill
Wiper refill
Flat repair
Mount,balance snowtires
Flat repair
Flat repair
Mount,balance snowtires
LOF
LOF
LOF
Adjust headlight
LOF
LOF
Install door handle
Flat repair
Flat repair,wheel change
Ball joint repair, labor
Ball joint repair, labor
Charger, labor
Charger, labor
Safety check, labor, lubricant
Safety check, labor, lubricant
Safety check, labor, lubricant
Safety check, labor, lubricant
Safety check, labor, lubricant
Safety check, labor, lubricant
Fuse, labor
Fuse, labor
Wheel change, flat repair
Janitorial svcs-January
Heater repair
Radiator repair
A l i gnment
Decals
Brake drum
Exhaust flange
~ary
Sprockets
GL Code
Number
760 3402
760 3101
760 3402
760 3402
760 3501
760 4810
760 3402
760 4810
760 3402
760 4810
760 3402
760 4810
760 3402
760 3402
760 4810
760 4810
760 4810
760 4810
760 4810
760 4810
760 3110
760 3402
760 4810
760 4810
760 3402
760 4810
760 4810
760 4810
760 4810
760 4810
760 3402
760 4810
760 3402
760 3402
760 4810
760 3402
760 4810
760 3402
760 4810
760 4810
760 3402
760 4810
760 4810
760 3402
760 4810
760 4810
760 3402
760 3402
760 3402
760 3402
760 3402
February 25 2002
Page 21
Amount
369.86
38.96
9.54
12.78
40.79
17.31
13.26
17.31
13.26
23.80
13.26
17.31
13.26
9.74
4.38
10.82
17.31
6.49
6.49
34.62
160.14
5.68
53.01
7.30
2.43
28.14
29.21
6.49
22.18
71.96
137.68
14.61
43.28
2.43
28.14
2.43
28.14
28.14
2.43
4.39
2.16
14.61
116.70
48.63
48.69
60.59
153.11
202.81
7.50
50.80
32.09
February 25 2002
Page 22
02/02/25 -18: 18
City of Port AngeLes - LIVE MACHINE
Fnd Opt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
68325 Simpson's Used Auto Parts 19199
68333 Les Schwab Tire Center (City) 19459
68334 Les Schwab TireCtr-SoLid Waste 19755
68335 LincoLn IndustriaL Corp. 12047
68337 Craft, Don
68343 MiddLeton Auto and Truck Inc.
03424
13117
.
Description
GL Code
Number
Amount
Sprockets 760 3402 25.57
BaLL bearings 760 3402 37.52
Key bLanks 760 3402 10.58
IdLer sprocket 760 3402 26.98
Cartridge for air dryer 760 3402 100.63
Radial baLL bearings 760 3402 445.99
RadiaL baLL bearings 760 3402 61.85
Radial ball bearings 760 3402 225.57
Tow charge 760 4810 59.51
Flat repair,valves,switches 760 3402 10.82
FLat repair,vaLves,switches 760 4810 84.29
FLat repair,vaLves,switches 760 4810 95.60
Flat repair,vaLves,switches 760 3402 7.03
WastehauLer lug,casings,mount 760 3110 246.98
WastehauLer Lug,casings,mount 760 4810 32.46
Wastehauler Lug,casings,mount 760 3402 173.12
FLat repair 760 4810 36.19
Tires,o-ring,seaLs 760 3110 189.35
Tires,o-ring,seaLs 760 4810 81.15
Tires,o-ring,seaLs 760 3402 6~
Tire,tire casing 760 3110 16
Tire,tire casing 760 3402 86.
Flat bar 760 3402 12.20
Chain 760 3402 93.79
Impact sockets,power shaft 760 3402 302.85
Fittings,nuts,washers,tees 760 3402 75.48
Tee 760 3402 24.64
FiLters,switch,screws 760 3402 108.49
Screws 760 3402 52.48
Filter 760 3402 47.48
Pump 760 3402 163.08
Core deposit,starter 760 3402 241.25
Invertor 760 3402 90.65
Seal 760 3402 28.54
SoLenoid 760 3402 35.37
Brush 760 3402 4.32
Connector 760 3402 1.14
Hose ends 760 3402 96.21
Battery charger 760 3402 38.94
Credit core deposit 760 3402 65.46-
Sprocket 760 3402 11. 65
Sprocket, hub 760 3402 12.77
Hub 760 3402 9.31
Bushing,filters,switch 760 3402 92.52
CLamps,fiLter,fitting,nuts 760 3402 21.56
Filter kit 760 3402 2.
Filter 760 3402
Freight for sprocket hub 760 3402 3.83
Fuse kit,fuses 760 3402 16.35
t&4' mount 760 3402 53.08
Screws 760 3402 .63
02/02/25-18: 18 City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE February 25 2002 Page 23
. CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
Connector 760 3402 1.60
Screws,nuts 760 3402 83.86
Heater core 760 3402 45.90
Temperature sensor,gasket 760 3402 17.49
Thermostat,gasket 760 3402 7.20
Filters,switches,fuse holder 760 3402 233. 14
Air freshners 760 3101 17.14
Screws, fitting 760 3402 38.71
Wrench 760 3501 8.79
Distributor cap, rotor 760 3402 25.36
Swivels 760 3501 275.21
Fittings 760 3402 18.91
Spark plugs 760 3402 10.97
Wiper blades 760 3402 9.78
Switch 760 3402 14.02
Muffler,tail pipe, extension 760 3402 87.24
Bell housing 760 3402 8.63
Trail balance 760 3402 9.19
Coupler 760 3402 19.81
. Clamp 760 3402 6.71
Loom 760 3402 10.60
Wheel nut 760 3402 4.56
Grease 760 3402 13.62
Electric meter 760 3402 45.41
Decals 760 3402 17.64
Strobe light 760 3402 164.34
Switches 760 3402 14.00
Spark plugs 760 3402 1.29
Pump 760 3402 32.45
Spark plugs 760 3402 2.58
Switches,oil filters,bulbs 760 3402 124.97
68345 N C Machinery Co. 14001 Key set 760 3402 16.23
68346 Northend Truck Equipment Inc. 14181 Cone holders,flaps,cab steps 760 6410 3,676.52
Cone holders,flaps,cab steps 760 6410 3,676.53
68350 Olympic Laundry & Clnrs Inc. 15026 Laundry services January 760 4990 185.99
Laundry svcs a/c 241 760 4990 57.51
68355 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030 File pockets, index cards 760 3101 22.71
Vi nyl letters 760 3402 15.04
Folders, labels 760 3101 46.50
68366 Pettit Oil Company 16302 Bulk lubricant 760 3220 282.23
EQ07 JAN DIESEL 760 3211 32.18
EQ09 JAN GAS 760 3210 21.49
EQ15 JAN GAS 760 3210 45.77
EQ18 JAN GAS 760 3210 29.53
. EQ18 JAN GAS 760 3210 12.60
EQ27 JAN GAS 760 3210 42.46
EQ28 JAN GAS 760 3210 35.11
EQ30 JAN GAS 760 3210 90.09
EQ40 JAN GAS 760 3210 71.45
F65 JAN GAS 760 3210 65.28
EQ42 JAN GAS 760 3210 28.95
02/02/25-18:18 City of Port Angeles - LI VE MACH I NE February 25 2002 Page 24
CHECK REGISTER .
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
EQ43 JAN GAS 760 3210 141. 08
EQ44 JAN GAS 760 3210 93.82
EQ45 JAN GAS 760 3210 40.74
EQ46 JAN GAS 760 3210 65.46
EQ47 JAN GAS 760 3210 69.44
EQ48 JAN GAS 760 3210 42.97
EQ65 JAN GAS 760 3210 17.89
EQ66 JAN GAS 760 3210 97.88
EQ70 JAN GAS 760 3210 125.00
EQ77 JAN GAS 760 3210 65.67
EQ78 JAN GAS 760 3210 40.99
EQ80 JAN GAS 760 3210 97.83
EQ81 JAN GAS 760 3210 64.63
EQ82 JAN GAS 760 3210 46.19
EQ83 JAN GAS 760 3210 161.24
EQ84 JAN GAS 760 3210 167.28
EQ86 JAN GAS 760 3210 40.95
EQ87 JAN GAS 760 3210 88.44
EQ88 JAN GAS 760 3210 74.35
EQ89 JAN GAS 760 3210 85.
EQ90 JAN GAS 760 3210 19
EQ95 JAN GAS 760 3210 62.
EQ96 JAN GAS 760 3210 38.11
EQ136 JAN GAS 760 3210 51.26
EQ147 JAN GAS 760 3210 19.60
EQ155 JAN DIESEL 760 3211 23.11
EQ191 JAN GAS 760 3210 39.72
68367 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Title transfer 760 4950 5.25
68369 Port Angeles Ford Lincoln 16158 Headlight switch 760 3402 7.94
Hose repair clips 760 3402 10.84
68375 Race Street Auto Parts 18048 Oxygen sensor,valve 760 3402 136.39
Muff ler 760 3402 62.44
Exhaust pipe 760 3402 16.29
Center link 760 3402 102.15
68378 Richmond 2-Way Radio 18009 Headlight,flasher 760 4810 48.69
Headlight,flasher 760 3402 77.90
68381 Ruddell Auto Mall 18019 Handle 760 3402 9.05
Handle 760 3402 20.52
Swi tch 760 3402 5.67
68385 Snap-on Tools - Chugger Deane 19108 Wrench,pump,light,screw driver 760 3501 336.30
68388 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware 19035 Hoses 760 3402 75.22
Clamp, tape rule, igniter 760 3402 52.01
Gaskets,sealant 760 3402 21.89
Pipe tee,adapters 760 3402 51.34
Hose,inverted flare,rags 760 3402 40.07
Flat bars,angle iron,washers 760 3402 8.
Cap 760 3402
Eye bolt 760 3402 11.51
Welding rod 760 3402 87.63
T66' pins 760 3402 3.30
Tape rule,brace 760 3402 17.52
02/02/25-18: 18
.
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
.
502 0002
.
503 0001
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Name
68391 Swain's General Store Inc.
68410 Wurth USA West Inc.
68421 Advanced Travel
68431 Chevron USA (Credit Card pmts)
68471 N C Machinery Co.
68473 Norstar Industries Inc.
68476 Novus Windshield Repair
68484 Parts Incorporated
68535 Western Peterbilt Inc.
68249 ACCIS (Assn.of County/City IS)
68252 AVAYA INC
68258 Angeles Communications Inc
68276 CDW Government Inc.
68299 Dungeness Comm & Design
68348 OLYPEN
68399 V P Consulting Inc.
68417 ACCIS (Assn.of County/City IS)
68419 AVAYA INC
68421 Advanced Travel
68428 Brooks, Gary
68455 Insight Direct Inc.
68485 paymentech
68527 Washington (DIS), State of
68310 Gordy'S Pizza & Pasta
68318 Healthcare Mgt Administrators
68384 Silva, Mike
Vendor
Number
19037
23062
01090
03060
14001
14108
14206
18126
23020
01309
12215
01069
03336
04210
15147
22123
01309
12215
01090
02277
09085
16421
23111
07272
08492
19316
Description
GL Code
Number
Tape rule, brace 760 3402
Pump, valve, coupler 760 3402
Screws,nuts 760 3402
Screw pin shackles 760 3402
Cylinder rent-January 2002 760 3101
Snap rings 760 3402
Paint 760 3402
Keys 760 3402
Gloves,cleaner,primer,enamel 760 3402
Gloves,cleaner,primer,enamel 760 3101
Horton,Burrett Burlington 1-17 760 4310
Credit card gasoline 760 3210
Keys 760 3402
Conveyor drive pads, rivets 760 3402
Conveyer belt 760 3402
Windshield repair 760 4810
Windshield repair 760 3402
Coordinator board 760 3402
Touch pad 760 3402
Oil dipstick 760 3402
Fuel tank cap 760 3402
February 25 2002
Total for Public Works
Total for Equipment Services Fund
Spring conference 2002-0'Neill 250 4310
02-02 AVAYA billing 250 4210
PVC wire,labor,jacks,faceplate 250 4150
Laptop Thinkpad,battery 250 3160
January maintenance,updates 250 4150
COPA wireless svcs pe 01-2003 250 4150
Laserfiche,NT Weblink 2 Scan 250 4800
NT Weblink Scan software 250 4800
Snapshot 2.E-Mail user license 250 4800
2002 Membership Dues 250 4901
02-02 AVAYA billing 250 4210
Brooks to Bellevue 1-31 250 4310
Reimburse books 250 3102
Switch,wire router, adapter 250 4810
Backup cartridges 250 3101
Hard drives, network switch 250 4810
Laptop memory upgrade 250 4810
Software purchase-Groupwise 250 4150
MS Office Pro 250 4800
Total for Information Technology Fund
Pizza-Human Resources 118 4909
~~l Admin fee-February 117 4601
Disability board claim-glasses 121 4635
Page 25
Amount
10.36
274.48
2.60
15.13
28.40
5.16
3.54
16.63
75.00
123.49
97.50
4.33
14.07
137.25
756.82
48.69
70.33
141. 70
365.30
114.01
106.32
21,756.39
29,866.83
100.00
29.29
936.74
1 ,739.25
881.25
3,988.00
6,492.00
4,858.18
1,201.02
50.00
90.89
53.55
202.56
411.54
383.24
1,334.39
108.89
150.00
44.75
23,055.54
7.56
1,683.60
221.84
02/02/25-18: 18
Fnd Opt Check
Number
68391
68432
68443
68453
68505
68512
68513
68523
652 0008
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Vendor
Name
Swain's General Store Inc.
Clallam Co YMCA
Gellor Insurance Inc.
Hunt, James
Sequim Aquatic Recreation Ctr.
Twi tchell, Mel
UNUM Life Ins Co of America
WCIA
68252 AVAYA INC
68278 Camera Corner
68391 Swain's General Store Inc.
697
68322 Jim's Pharmacy (Inc)
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 02/09/2002 To 02/22/2002
Vendor
Number
19037
03076
07030
08176
19015
20043
21000
23204
12215
03044
19037
10020
698 68329 LEOFF 12043
68357 PERS 16016
68440 Washington (Unemp), State of 23178
68442 Flex-Plan Services (Payroll) 06062
68477 Office of Support Enforcement 15072
68478 Office of Support Enforcement 15166
68506 States West Life Insurance Co. 19313
68514 US Department of Education 21075
68516 United Way (payroll) 21028
68519 Volunteer Fire Association 22060
68526 WSCFF/Employee Benefit Trust 23628
Description
Safety jacket
Membership-McCaleb
Excess workers comp-liability
Reimburse medical expenses
Membership-German
Reimburse medical expenses
March premium
Reimb extra expenses pe 12-31
February 25 2002
GL Code
Number
118 4909
121 4150
118 4150
121 4630
121 4150
121 4630
121 4631
119 4150
Total for Self - Insurance Fund
02-02 AVAYA billing
Sl ides
Sl ides
Paper towels, sponge, bags, soap
868 4210
868 3101
868 3101
868 3120
Total for Esther Webster Trust Fund
Overpmt rfd-#116378 5-00,9-00 697 2391000
Total for Accts.Receivable Clearing Fund
January contributions
January contributions
Payroll deduction pe 02-20
Payroll deduction pe 02-20
Payroll deduction pe 02-20
Payroll deduction pe 02-20
March premium
Payroll deduction pe 02-20
Payroll deduction pe 02-20
Payroll deduction pe 02-20
Payroll deduction pe 02-20
698 2315120
698 2315130
698 2315210
698 2315210
698 2315210
698 2315210
698 2315160
698 2315210
698 2315240
698 2315210
698 2315210
Total for Accounts Payable Clearing Fund
68
Grand Total
Page 26
.
Amount
64.78
106.00
2,267.00
48.50
225.50
88.50
2,383.11
31,374.46
38,470.85
9.76
16.77
8.39
15.45
50.37
5.38
5.
17,307.79
29,110.71
24.74
950.96
1,321.13
181.38
553.40
69.41
432.06
44.00
1 ,425.00
51,420.58
751,654.48
.
.
.
.
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
March 5, 2002
To:
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT:
Equipment Purchases/Leases for 2002 Utilizing Washington State Bid Contracts
Summary: The 2002 budget contains funds to replace and/or rent various pieces of
equipment. The equipment is available through the the Washington State bid or cooperative
purchasing agreements. The utilization ofthis process will save the City time and funds by
eliminating the need to produce specifications and solicit bids. Equipment available through the
State Bid process is less expensive to purchase because of the volume of equipment that the
State purchases. The replacement costs exceed the City Manager's authority and requires
approval by the City Council.
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to proceed with the ordering, purchase
and/or rental of equipment from the State Bid and King County cooperative agreement,
not to exceed the budgeted amounts, for purchasing 2 -light utility 4x4's, 1 - one-ton truck
4x4 with a utility body, and 1 - sma1l4x4 extended cab truck and rent an asphalt grinder.
Background / Analysis:
It is requested that the City Manager be authorized to purchase 2 - light utility 4x4's, 1 - one-ton
truck 4x4 with a utility body, and 1 - small4x4 extended cab truck and rent an asphalt grinder
utilizing State bid contracts and existing cooperative agreements. The City Manager's purchase
authority is $15,000 which necessitates the City Council authorization.
The 2002 budget contains a number of pieces of equipment for replacement or rental that are
available from the State bid contracts and/or through cooperative purchasing agreements with
other agencies. In 1989 the City entered into a Intergovernmental Cooperative Purchasing
Agreement with Washington State. This agreement allows the City to utilize existing
Washington State contracts that have been bid competitively for the purchase of materials and
equipment. This process not only saves time in putting together bid specifications but it also
results in a more competitive price due to the potential of a larger number of items being
purchased.
Funds for the equipment are budgeted in the Eq}li1?ment Services and Public Works and Utilities
division budgets. No additional funds are neecQV
CIty CouncIl Memo
Dated March 5, 2002
Page 2
.
Summary of purchases and rentals with funding sources.
Equipment Method of Purchase Total Cost Budget Amount
Department/Division (Incl. tax) Total
1 One- ~~n Truck 4x4, State Bid/truck & $38,000 $12,794 Equipment
Crew Cab with a King County Services & $25,206
Utility Body for Waste Cooperative Waste Water
Water Agreement/truck body
2 Light Utility 4x4 State Bid $40,424 $24,866 Equipment
Vehic1es for Light Ops ($20,212 each) Service & $15,558
Light Ops
1 Small Pickup 4x4 State Bid $18,259 $16,403 Equipment
Extended Cab for Solid Service & $1,856
Waste Solid Waste
Asphalt Grinder State Bid/Rental $20,000 $20,000 Street
for Street
.
.
N \TEMP\Rental]urchase Approval_2002 wpd
70
.
F'- 0- RT-'P;.N-G- E'LE'S'
1;./ ! \ I I '
J I i_I'-'
--- -" ~"- - - -- ;--- -'- -' ---' '- '---' ,~
N
u.
A
DATE:
March 5, 2002
To:
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT:
Final Acceptance for Landfill Closure 2000 Project 20-04
Summary: Glacier Environmental Services Inc. has completed the closure of cell 1 and a portion
of cell 2 at the Port Angeles Landfill as required by the contract. The work has been inspected
and accepted as complete and Glacier Environmental has been paid the final payment in the
amount of $1,158,286.42. Retainage held for the project was in the form of a bond.
.
Recommendation: Accept the Landfill Closure 2000 Project 21-14 and authorize release of
the retainage upon receipt of clearances from the Departments of Revenue and Labor and
Industries.
Background / Analysis:
Glacier Environmental Services, Inc. has completed the Landfill cell closure as defined in the
contract documents. This project was budgeted at $1,400,000. Funding was provided through
the Solid Waste fund.
The original contract amount was $953,108.38 and the final contract, including change orders in
the amount of$194,957.07, was $1,148,065.45. Increased unit quantities totaling $10,220.97
were added to this amount. The final contract amount is $1,158,286.42.
Original Contract Change Orders Unit Quantity Final Cost Project Cost
Amount (2) Variations Variance
$953,108.38 $194,957.07 $10,220.97 $1,158,286.42 0.9%
.
71
N \PROJECTS\20-04\CCACPT wpd
.
.
.
72
.
FORT ANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
March 5, 2002
To:
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT:
Final Acceptance for Temporary Fire Hall Roof Repair Project 21-14
Summary: Aldergrove Construction, Inc. has completed the Temporary Fire Hall Roof Repair
Project. The work has been inspected and accepted as complete. Aldergrove has been paid
$39,197.94. The City is holding retainage in the amount of$1,995.82.
Recommendation: Accept the Temporary Fire Hall Roof Repair Project No. 21-14 and
authorize release of the retain age upon receipt of clearances from the Departments of
Revenue and Labor and Industries.
. Background / Analysis:
The contract with Aldergrove Construction, Inc. for the Temporary Fire Hall Repair Project
included removal of the existing ceiling in the apparatus bays and the crew quarters,
encapsulation of mold, cleaning the crew quarters, and replacing portions of the ceiling.
Aldergrove was responsive and has completed the work in a timely fashion. Reserve funds are
being utilized to fund this emergency project.
The original contract amount was $18,027.20 including tax, and the final contract amount,
adjusted for quantity variance, was $41,193.76. There were two contract change orders. The
large unit variation is primarily due to extended rental of environmental air quality equipment in
the crew quarters.
Original Contract Change Orders Unit Quantity Final Cost Project Cost
Amount (2) Variations Variance
$18,027.20 $15,457.07 $7,709.48 $41,193.76 18.7%
.
The City's engineering consultant for the investigation of the problem and the temporary repairs
is preparing an estimate of cost for long-term corrective actions needed to make final
repairs/replacement of the roof as well as associated design costs. It is anticipated that the report
will be received the week of March 4th. Costs expended to date are being documented in an
effort to recover funds from our insurance carrier and/or the designer of record and builder's
surety.
73
N \PROJECTS\2I-14 FH Roof\CCACPT wpd
.
.
.
74
.
.
.
Appointments to Plannin~ Commission.
Board of Adjustment. and Civil Service Commission
March 5, 2002
Planning Commission: (1 Vacancy)
Larry Little
Leonard Rasmussen
Greg Bondy
Michael Bolster
Terry Donnell
Nancy Lynn Newman
~//hJ
~ f.; () (.;
t,fJ.J / M ?
Board of Adjustment: (1 Vacancy)
Greg Bondy (also applied for Planning Commission)
Stanley Harris
Civil Service Commission: (1 Vacancy)
Daniel Sterling
75
.
.
.
76
.
.
.
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
March 5, 2002
To:
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
DENNIS C. DICKSON, SR. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
SUBJECT:
THE LISTING OF CERTAIN CITY OWNED PROPERTIES FOR SALE
Summary: The City currently owns three properties which it desires to sell. The two larger
properties were acquired by the City through foreclosure after default by the prior owners on
payments due under LID 211. The third property was the site of a former City Light substation
which has been declared surplus.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign
agreements with Coldwell Banker Uptown Reality to list for sale the described properties; said
listing to run until December 31, 2002.
Background / Analysis: The City of Port Angeles acquired certain properties located on Del
Guzzi Road as a result of a default under LID 211 by the prior owner. The larger parcel had been
the site of a proposed planned residential development. It is felt to be in the City's best interest to
offer its larger parcel of property for sale in both its present undivided status and as a platted
subdevelopment. A $1,600,000.00 listing price has been recommended on the entire parcel in its
present unplatted condition by Coldwell Banker Uptown Reality. Coldwell Banker was previously
selected by the City to assist it in marketing real estate which it wishes to sell.
The second parcel of property acquired by the City as a result of the LID 211 foreclosure consists
of a commercially zoned parcel of property which is approximately .7 acres, located on Del Guzzi
drive adjacent to the Olympic Best Western Lodge. A listing price of $75,000 has been
recommended for this parcel.
The final parcel of property consists of a residential building lot located at the comer of 7th and
Albert streets which is a site of a former City Light substation. The substation was decommissioned
and the property remediated to prepare the proPf~y for sale. A listing price of$25,000 has been
Page - 2
February 28, 2002
CIty Council Memo
recommended for this property. Since the City has already been contacted by a prospective
purchaser concerning the 7th and Albert property, that prospective purchaser has been specifically
been excluded from the listing agreement for the first 30 days of the listing.
Attached are Sale and Listing Agreements for each of the three properties described. The
agreements have been reviewed by the Sf. Assistant City Attorney. The Real Estate subcommittee
of the City Council reviewed this issue at the February 12,2002 meeting and it concurred with the
recommendations, subject to City Attorney review.
C \DMEMOIck-COUNCIL wpd
78
.
.
.
WAR Form No.l-102-R
NWMlS Fonn No. 1A
Exclusive Sale EXCLUSIVE SALE AND LISTING AGREEMENT
Rev. 12196
Page10f _pages 11. \ J \ ) () J J 1-- - ",J
The undersigned Seller ("Seller") hereby grants to ---L.:.QI ...)i (' , /...S '1 "J . ct./" l p:, \ (j l;.J , ("Broker")
.frOmdatehereofuntdmidnightof _I :) -~ \-- O!)..- _ ,the sole and exclusive righllosubmitoffers to puriase. 2
andtorecelplfor sitsinconnectiontherewith,\herealproperty("thePropertyjcommonlyknownas \)t.I i.J~ lJ/Vt' - l t ..:t-~,\ C' I 3
In the City of ,j (r; ~ [, f 5 , County of (! l- 4 t- L. /J (Y) , State of Washington, Zip' , and legally 4
~ .fr:" ~;k~ IA I'/ I' 'A If
ATTORNEYS' FEES. In the event either party employs an attomey to enforce any terms of this Agreement and IS successful, the other party agrees to pay reasonable 60
attorneys' fees. In the event of trial, the successful party shall be entitled to an award of attomeys' fees and expenses; the amount of the attomeys' fees and expenses 61
shall be fixed by the court. The venue of any suit shall be the county In which the property is located. 62
---6ATED THIS DAY OF . 0I0e- Are the undersigned the sole owner(s)? 0 YES 0 NO 63
e <-,/,) vJ (II
.4.
.12.
C Copynghl 1996
Washington Informabon Network
All RIGtfTS RESERVED
described as. LOT
5
6
1.
DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Agreement (a) "MLS" means the ("?-/o it f>- ~ G ( /-(-5 Multiple Lisbng Ser- :
vice/AssociationlBureau; and (b) "sell" includes a contract to sell; an exchange or contract to exchange; an option to purchase; and/or a lease with option to purchase. 9
AGENCYIDUALAGENCY. sellerauthoriz~sBrokertoappoint J ~ CC- 5 ch q")/ k to act as Seller's Listing 10
Agent(s) It IS underslood and agreed that this Agreement creates an agency relabonship With Lisbng Agent(s) and Broker only, not with any other sales associates of Broker. 11
Any broker or salesperson, other than Broker or Listing AgenL who procures a prospective buyer fur the Property will not be representing Seller and may represent the Buyer. 12
Accordingly, for the purposes of this Agreement, the tenn "Broker" means Lis~ng Agent(s) and Lisbng Agenfs Broker or Designated Broker, unless expressly stated otherwise. 13
Seller agrees that if the Property is sold 10 a buyer represented by one of Broker's salespersons other than Listing Agent(s), then Seller consents 10 Broker acting as a dual 14
agent Seller further agrees that If the Property is sold to a buyer who listing Agent also represents, then Seller consents to Listing Agent(s) and Broker acting as dual agents. 15
Seller acknowledges that a dual agent represents both parties to a transac\ion; that the parties' interest In the transaction may differ and that a dual agent is not pennilled 16
to give adVice to either party to the detriment of the other party, promote or advocate the Interest of either party over the other party, or disclose to either party confidential 17
Infonnation from or conceming the other party. If this Agreementis executed on or after January 1, 1997, then Seller acknowledges receipt of the pamphlet entitied "The Law 18
of Real Estate Agency". 19
2.
3. COMMISSION. If (a) Broker procures a Buyer on the terms in thiS Agreement, or on other tenns acceptable to Seller; or (b) Seller directly or indirectly or through any person 20
21
Further, if 22
Seller shall, within _clays (180 if nOl iii In) after the expKatlOn of thiS Agreement, sell the Property to any person to whose attentlOfl it was brought through the signs, advertising 23
or other action of Broker, or on informatIOn secured d1rect1y or IndlfeClly from or through Broker, dunng the term of thIS Agreement, then Seller will pay Broker the above commission. 24
Provided, thalli a commiSSIon is paid to a member of MLS If) conjunction wrlh a sale, the amount of commiSSIOn payable to Broker shall be fimrted to the amount of comrrnssion 25
which would have been payable pursuant to thIS Agreemenlless any commission so paid to another member of MLS. ProVIded further, that II Seller cancels thiS Agreement wrlhout 26
legal cause, Seller may be liable for damages Incurred by Broker as a result of cancenation, regardless of whether Seller pays a commISSIOn to another MLS member. 27
KEYBOX. Broker is authorized to install a keybox on the Properly. Such keybox may be opened by a master key held by all members ofMLS and their salespeople. A master 28
key also may be held by affiliated third parnes such as inspectors and appraisers who cannot have access to the Property without Broker's prior approval which will not be 29
given without Broker first making reasonable efforts to obtain Seller's approval. 30
5.
SELLER'S WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS. Seller warrants that he/she has the nght 10 sell the Property on the terms herein and that the Property infonnation 31
on the additional pages to this Agreement is correct. Further, Seller represents that to the best of Seller's knowledge, there are no structures or boundary indicators that either 32
encroach on adjacent property or on this Property. Seller understands that Broker and other members of MLS will make representabons 10 prospective buyers based on the 33
Property infonnabon on the additional pages to this Agreement Seller agrees to Indemnify and hold Broker and other members of MLS hannless in the event the foregoing 34
warranties and representations are incorrect. 35
6.
CLOSING COSTS. Seller agrees to fumish and pay for a buyer's polley of btle insurance showing marketable title to the Property. Seller agrees to pay real estate excise 36
tax and one-half of any escrow fees or such portion of escrow fees and any other fees or charges as provided by law in the case of FHA or VA financed sale. Rent, taxes, 37
interest, reserves, assumed encumbrances, homeowner fees and insurance are to be prorated between Seller and Buyer as of the date of closing. 38
MULTIPLE LISTING. Broker shall cause this listing to be published by MLS. Broker may refer this listing to any other mulbple listing service at Broker's discretion. Broker 39
shall cooperate with all other members of MLS, or of a multiple listing service to which this listing is referred, in working toward the sale of the Property. Regardless of whether 40
a cooperating MLS member Is the agent of the Buyer, the Seller, neither or both, the member shall be entitled 10 receive the selling office's share of the commission. SELLER 41
UNDERSTANDS AND AGREES THAT THE PROPERTY INFORMATION ON THE ADDITIONAL PAGES TO THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE GIVEN TO PROSPECTIVE 42
BUYERS AND TO OTHER COOPERATING MEMBERS OF MLS WHO DO NOT REPRESENT THE SELLER AND, IN SOME INSTANCES, MAY REPRESENT THE BUYER. 43
IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT MLS IS NOT A PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT AND ITS SOLE FUNCTION IS TO FURNISH THE DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION ON THE 44
ADDITIONAL PAGES OF THIS LISTING TO ITS MEMBERS, WITHOUT VERIFICATION AND WITHOUT ASSUMING ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH INFORMATION 45
OR IN RESPECT TO THIS AGREEMENT. 46
7.
8.
DISCLAIMER/SELLER'S INSURANCE. Neither Broker, MLS, nor any members of MLS or of any multiple listing service to which this listing is referred shall be responsible 47
for loss, theIL or damage of any nature or kind whatsoever to the Properly and/or to any personal property therein, including entry by the master key to the keybox and/or at open 48
houses. Seller is advised to notify Seller's Insurance company that the Property Is listed for sale and ascertain that the Seller has adequate Insurance coverage. 49
If the Property is to be vacant during all or part of the term of this listing, Seller should request that a "vacancy clauseR be added to Seller's insurance policy. 50
BROKER'S RIGHT TO MARKET THE PROPERTY. Seller shall not commit any act which materially impairs Broker's ability to market and sell the Property under the terms 51
of this Agreement In the event of breach of the foregOing, Seller agrees to pay Broker a commiSSion in the above amount, or at the above rate applied to the listing price 52
herein, whichever is appficable. Broker shall be entitled to show the Property at all reasonable times Broker need not submit 10 Seller any offers to lease, rent, execute an 53
option to purchase, or enter into any agreement other than for Immediate sale of the Property. 54
9.
10. REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Unless Seller is exempt under RCW 64.06, Seller shall prOVIde to Broker as soon as reasonably practicable 55
a completed and signed "Real Property Transfer Disclosure Statement" (W.A.R. Fonn 0-5 or NWMLS Form 17). Seller agrees 10 indemnify, defend and hold Broker hannless 56
from and against any and all claims that the infannabon Seller provides on WAR. Form 0-5 or NWMLS Fonn 17 is inaccurate. 57
11. DAMAGES IN THE EVENT OF BUYER'S BREACH. In the event Seller retains earnest money as liquidated damages on Buyer's breach, any costs advanced or committed 58
by Broker on Seller's behalf shall be paid therefrom and the balance divided equally between Seller and Broker. 59
BROKER (COMPANY)
&4/'0r t.lfi<>~
LER
65
64
BY
Pg.10f1
Sales Price:
Tenns:
Location:
ACre8!!e:
Zonin!!:
Utilities:
C \1-~ @J ((,A-,
EXCLUSIVE SALE AND LISTING AGREEMENT
.
4:\ 1,(110) I) & 0
QJ~- ~ \-t
D e 16'-J'n,' Q) , (') {] ~ i u l-I w':'1 ~
~J)
~ f ~ '~r I P 00J f'"j W c, \ t ((....J 'Pj40"ve...
Amenities: V0c11cLt.- fYYQ-- ~ U I ;>\-oJ...{ ) jJ'e. Al TO fo d J (' ~vJ.J e.,
~(~t ~(JUAJL/ CV"-lck
Taxes: t d---f MF r
Restrictions: L to N I JtJ,
TOD02I"8phv:
Tax Parcel II:
.
Fl ,,~) J'" cpe,
6
Directions: 191~~ WI,9 \ wc.J I () ( J j l> '-" (I., ",J Q e-Ij 1177/
rYD tJ3 U c3\ lJ ,,.)6 I
~~
SELLER:
~TE:
.
DATE:
80
Whether Buying or Selling. Always Call JACK for LaDd!
Coldwell Banker Uptown Realty, Port Angeles, Washington 98362
.
.
.
02-08-2002 10:47AM
#
FROM CLALLAM TITLE CO PA TO
..d.ll.
1999 1027423 ==
RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF
AND AFTER RECORDING RE11JRN TO:
Craig D. Knutson
City Attorney
City ofPol1 Angeles
321 East Fifth Street
P.~. Box 1150
Pon Angeles, Washington 98362
CERTIFICATE OF PURCHASE
Grantor:
City of Port Angeles. Washington
City of Port Angeles, Washington
Grantee:
4172142 P.02
FltLO fClll k~ClJ~D AT I"" ."
.... ...Qtll;~J
Ri~~oti f!u 4
D 1'1: ALl AM m-
99 APR"6 PH 210S .
VtJ.. n" _ ~
Kf1ft'-r~G~-
CLAL~~5t.t~DITOR .....:..
BY. t . WASH.
-- DePUTY
Legal Description:
Parcels 1. 2, 3, S. 6. 7 aDd 8, Volume 11 of Swveys,
Page 44. and Lot 3. Short Plat No. 85-11-7, Volume 16
of Short Plats. Page 58.
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#: 063013-211000; 063012-340200; 063012-340300;
063012-340500; 063012-340600; 063012-340700;
06301~340800;0630IZ.349020.
Reference # (If applicable): N/A
~.OI
(g)
81
c..o
o
~
. ::;)
t\:)
-.]
~
i'-'
v~
~
WAR. Fonn No. L-102-R
NWMLS Form No 1A
exclusive Sale
Rev. 12196
Page 1 of _pages {! \ 1 II
The undersigned Seller ("Seller") hereby grants to / (j (. W t
I.~ -2t.... o~
*NORTH PENINSULA BUILDING ASSOCIATION EXCLUDED
FOR THE 1st 30 DAYS OF LISTING
EXCLUSIVE SALE AND LISTING AGREEMENT
e Copyright 1996
Washington Informabon Nelwoll<
AlL RIGHTS RESERVED
Q Ct J]cto'''"
v P /1'{) W.N
, ("Broker")
from date hereof unbl midnight of
, the sole and exclusive right to submit offe
.r 7~d- l~( I )
q 8$//.J.; and legally 4
and to receipt for osits In connection thereWIth, the real property ("the Property") common
In the City of (!> If' I>r ,J (; t _ (j, . _ ' County of ' . ;, I, it.h')
descri~ed as LOT -1..L Q ~.L_ .:). 01.[ I to v-J ;t.l=~ J.rk. -() f
<S e c.. ~J-.-t\ ~~ j-1- I, ft- ~l _
, State of washnon, Zip
& f& ~ ~lcr, t:!
5
6
1.
7
DEFINITIONS. For purposes of thiS Agreement (a) "MLS" means the ~ ~ t( 0 ~ Multiple Listing Ser- 8
vice/AssoclationlBureau; and (b) "sell" includes a contract to sell; an excha ge or contract to exchange; an option to purchase; and/or a lease with option to purchase. 9
AGENCYIDUAL AGENCY. Seller authoriz~s Broker to appoint J ~ t F.2- .{C (!. H j'Y) ) T~ to act as Seller's Listing 10
Agent(s). It is understood and agreed that this Agreement creates an agency relabonship With Lisbng Agent(s) and Broker only, not with any other sales associates of Broker. 11
Any broker or salesperson, other than Broker or Listing Agent, who procures a prospective buyer for the Property will not be representing Seller and may represent the Buyer. 12
AccordinQlv, for the purposes of this Agreement, the term "Broker" means Lisbng Agent(s) and Listing Agenfs Broker orOesignated Broker, unless expressly stated otherwise. 13
Seller agrees that if the Property IS sold to a buyer represented by one of Broker's salespersons other than Listing Agent(s), then Seller consents to Broker acting as a dual 14
agent. Seller further agrees that if the Property IS sold to a buyer who Listing Agent also represents, then Seller consents to Listing Agent(s) and Broker acting as dual agents. 15
Seller acknowledges that a dual agent represents both parties to a transaction; that the parties' Interest In the transaction may differ and that a dual agent is not permitted 16
to give adVice to either party to the detriment of the other party, promote or advocate the Interest of either party over the other party, or disclose to either party confidential 17
information from or concerning the other party. Ifthls Agreementis executed on or after January 1, 1997, then Seller acknowledges receipt of the pamphlet entitled "The Law 18
of Real Estate Agency". 19
2.
3. COMMISSION. If (a) Broker procures a Buyer on the terms in this Agreement, or on other terms acceptable to Seller; or (b) Seller directly or Indirectly or through any person 20
or enbty other than Broker, during the term hereof, sells the Property; then Seller will pay Broker a commiSSion of (fill in one and strike the other)
J 0 % of the sales price, or $
21
Further, if 22
Seller shaD, within _days (180 If not filled In) after the exptratlOl1 of thIS Agreement, sell the Property to any poo;on to whose attention It was brought ttvough the signs, advertising 23
or other action of Broker, or on information secured dIrectly or Indirectly from or through Broker, dunng the term of thls Agreement, then Seller w~1 pay Broker the above commission. 24
Provided, that if a commISSIon IS paid to a member of MLS In conjunctIOn with a sale, the amount of commission payable to Broker shall be hmited to the amount of comnllSsion 25
whICh would have been payable pursuant to thls Agreement less any commISSIon so paId to another member 01 MLS. Provided further, that If Seller cancels this Agreement without 26
legal cause, Seller may be liable for damages Incurred by Broker as a resuU of cancellation, regardless of whether Seller pays a commISSIon to another MLS member. 27
4. KEYBOX. Broker IS authorized to install a keybox on the Property. Such keybox may be opened by a master key held by all members of MLS and their salespeople. A master 28
key also may be held by affihated third parties such as inspectors and appraisers who cannot have access to the Property WIthOUt Broker's prior approval which will no.
gIven without Broker first making reasonable efforts to obtaIn Seller's approval.
5. SELLER'S WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS. Seller warrants that he/she has the right to sell the Property on the terms herein and that the Property information 31
on the addibonal pages to this Agreement is correct Further, Seller represents thai to the best of Seller's knowledge, there are no structures or boundary indicators that either 32
encroach on adjacent property or on this Property. Seller understands that Broker and other members of MLS will make representations to prospective buyers based on the 33
Property Information on the additional pages to this Agreernent Seller agrees to indemnify and hold Broker and other members of MLS harmless in the event the foregoing 34
warranties and representations are incorrect 35
6. CLOSING COSTS. Seller agrees to furnish and pay for a buyer's policy of title insurance showing marketable title to the Property. Seller agrees to pay real estate excise 36
tax and one-half of any escrow fees or such portion of escrow fees and any other fees or charges as provided by law In the case of FHA or VA financed sale. Rent, taxes, 37
interest, reserves, assumed encumbrances, homeowner fees and insurance are to be prorated between Seller and Buyer as of the date of closing. 38
7 . MULTIPLE LISTING. Broker shall cause this listing to be published by MLS. Broker may refer thiS listing to any other multiple listing service at Broker's discretion. Broker 39
shall cooperate WIth all other rnembers of MLS, or of a multiple listing service to which this listing is referred, in working toward the sale of the Property. Regardless of whether 40
a cooperabng MLS member is the agent of the Buyer, the Seller, neither or both, the member shall be entitled to receive the selling office's share of the commission. SELLER 41
UNDERSTANDS AND AGREES THAT THE PROPERTY INFORMATION ON THE ADDITIONAL PAGES TO THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE GIVEN TO PROSPECTIVE 42
BUYERS AND TO OTHER COOPERATING MEMBERS OF MLS WHO DO NOT REPRESENT THE SELLERAND,IN SOME INSTANCES, MAY REPRESENT THE BUYER. 43
IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT MLS IS NOT A PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT AND ITS SOLE FUNCTION IS TO FURNISH THE DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION ON THE 44
ADDITIONAL PAGES OF THIS LISTING TO ITS MEMBERS, WITHOUT VERIFICATION AND WITHOUT ASSUMING ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH INFORMATION 45
OR IN RESPECT TO THIS AGREEMENT. 46
B. DISCLAIMER/SELLER'S INSURANCE. Neither Broker, MLS, nor any members of MLS or of any muUlple listing service to which this hsting is referred shall be responsible 47
for loss, theft, or damage of any nature or kind whatsoever to the Property and/or to any personal property therein, induding entry by the master key to the keybox andlor at open 48
houses. Seller is advised to notify Seller's Insurance company that the Property Is listed for sale and ascertain that the Seller has adequate insurance coverage. 49
If the Property Is to be vacant during all or part of the term of this listing, Seller should request that a "vacancy clause" be added to Seller"s Insurance policy. 50
9. BROKER'S RIGHT TO MARKET THE PROPERTY. Seller shall not commit any act which matenally Impairs Broker's ability to market and sell the Property under the terms 51
of this Agreement. In the event of breach of the foregoing, Seller agrees to pay Broker a commission in the above amount, or at the above rate applied to the listing price 52
herein, whichever IS apphcable. Broker shall be enlltled to show the Property at all reasonable times. Broker need not submit to Seller any offers to lease, rent, execute an 53
option to purchase, or enter into any agreement other than for immediate sale of the Property. 54
10. REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Unless Seller is exempt under RCW 64.06, Seller shall provide to Broker as soon as reasonably practicable 55
a completed and signed "Real Property Transfer Dlsdosure Statement" (W.A.R. Form 0-5 or NWMLS Form 17). Seller agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Broker harmless 56
from and against any and all claims that the information Seller provides on WAR. Form 0-5 or NWMLS Form 17 is inaccurate. 57
11. DAMAGES IN THE EVENT OF BUYER'S BREACH. In the event Seller retains earnest money as liquidated damages on Buyer's breach, any costs advanced or committed 58
by Broker on Seller's behalf shall be paid therefrom and the balance divided equally between Seller and Broker. 59
12. ATTORNEYS' FEES. In the event either party employs an attorney to enforce any terms of thiS Agreement and is successful, the other party agrees to pay reaso.
attorneys' fees. In the event of trial, the successful party shall be entitled to an award of attorneys' fees and expenses; the amount of the attorneys' fees and expe 1
shall be fixed by the court. The venue of any SUit shall be the county in which the property is located. 62
DATED THIS DAY OF
BROKER (COMPANY) eel c../ ().) III
BY
fl C, ,Jlt (/'
~ER
SELLER
,~
Are the underSigned the sole owner(s)? 0 YES 0 NO 63
64
65
Pg. ~ or~
.
Sales Price:
Tenns:
Location:
Acrea~e:
Zonin~:
Utilities:
Amenities:
. Taxes:
Restrictions:
L \T~ CD~ P.A.
EXCLUSIVE SALE AND LISTING AGREEMENT
it ';lE, t/JOO I
L-(\ ~\H I
'} ~ c}. A I bev '( I
I
L 0 ,. -b-O y.. 1"-1' 6)
R- \-* 0 I
I
W li' <t.-(l \ P eJ w tlL J rei e ph",.! (' \ -S.c w t' fL
(: [J A \ ,.)-/____1 ~ k.. ;:: (v<,.1! (' e. I M J,.-fi I II, ( ul6
. I I ~
~ffY'rT
~ \\~ -ZJ)~ I~ ~
Tax Parcel II:
1)(0 Q 0 0 (!)
f~6T
o{t-
I
I
I
!
~ (ll; lot? J ~
I V
I
I
I
I
!
TOD02I1lphv: _fL l u 1-
Directions:
. SELLER:
SELLER:
I i--JL..
~ (d 11 erl-
f?,.)
L
~
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I 83
Whether Buyiag Of Selling. AJways Can JACK for Land!
Coldwell Banker Uptown iRealty, Port Angeles, Washington 98362
DA TE:
...
~;.h~l i\
{\ I (
Pr
.
~ "."..,.~.
I. ..:.~> .
.~r~, '-::,
f . .":3
' , ! J'
\i.._............"'.-.....~.................l4..._ ._~~.
r--~~s-~~:~~-;;;E-;;~-~;;[.;~;~;;.~-~;;:--l
I
I
I
I
flUD I ~a R[Cbl~ AT J:i[ Rmm i
BlllJMF I
OF IELO 6- DMJSTJTl~ I
co.
REr:ORnrn III vm. ___ r
I
I
IS6HEi:J,S HIt 10 !
I
.
J'~ _..___ _..._.. _ :J~r;r I
j;:;C'!:. A. fWII'!" ;ii,j'irUK !
CL~Llt.:1 C(:.iil!'I:II~" !
... . '. I
.."'---ut:= __n --.------a~jaiT _n_ ----
~ February 26. 1964
WJ I
~I
~
I
~
J
.
l
,
I
i
~
.
1
J
..
;;:
I
34614fl
Flied for Record at Request of
BRUM~IRD (,. DAVIS TITU: CO.
II. ,:o,tt. uu..t ~'. .. PIt. ~57."2'
P'.J!':T AN~El:S. \: \"~I"GTON
.,..
:;.
.-1
c..O
~
~
Name..._........___....._......_._____..__.__........_.........__.
Addreea._.._......__.._..__..___..___...._....____._._....._
City and Slale......._.._._..__......_...._.._._.._....._._._.._..._
Statutory Wananty Deed
f'...... 487- I-REV
THE GRANTORS. ED\o/IN VANNAUSDLE and DELORES N. VANiMUSDLE. his wife.
and ERNEST LACKt1AN and SHIRLEY 11. LACKMArl. his wife.
for and in con3ideration of Three Thousdnd Seven hundred Dollars (S 3,700.00)
In hand paid, conv~' and warranl'to the CITY OF PORT AflGELES. a municipal carPeo
the following de3Cribed real ~3tate, situated in tbe County of Clallam St.ate of
W ubington: ,
Lot Eighteen (18) in Block Two Hundred Four (204) of the
Townsite of Pprt Angeles.
Subject to Local Improvement District No. 183 assessment in
the amount of $1.120.81.
".'-:_'1 ...'
IW. <j 0 1 :3
ClAlLAM COUNTY 31.00
TRANSACTION EXCISE TAX
~
, /'
{,
1I,~~~
{l".
,r~:;: d
j I ,',;-
.~ ~...u~~, -tr.
PAID FEB 26 1964
AMOUNT'J..., 00.00
COllltTY ~~~URER
IlY.}.J~~.
Dated lhIl ~ 4/ .d clay of -I ~ .196" .
-~~'-""'''''''(.UL)
illw:~.~~~~:.................(SlAL).
STATE OF WASHINGTON, { ~ ~ ~L
Co~tyof Cla1lam ,a ~~~~~.~~~~~~
On this day personally a~ b~fore me r EDWIN VAlWAUSDLE and DELORES !.j. VA:--1NAUSDLE.
his wife, and ERNEST LACKt-'iAN and SHIRLEY 11. LACK~lAN, his ~Iife,
to me known to be the individuals described in and wbo execuled the within and foregoing innrument, and
acbowledged that they signed Ihe same as their '\ 1[Je "'~ vo!untary act and deed, for the
U3eS and P\UP03e! therein mentioned. (". ,._...._ ~_
e
WAR FORn No. l-102-R
NWMLS Form No. 1A C Copyright 1996
~~ Sale pages f\ EXCLJUSIVE SjAl,LE f!t LIST kiNG AGREEM~T , wa~~~~~~~~~~~
The undersigned Seller ("Seller") hereby grants to L/ () I ( \ AJ (, l ~ 1I~' [II U ( I (J 0....).,/'-1 , ("Broker")
from date hereof until midnight of / a.- 1/- () .1 I , the sole and exclusive right to submit offers to purchase, 2
and to receiplfordeposits inconnectiontherewith,the reaIProperty('thepropehYicommOnIYknOWn as , ~ t Ii C'_. C II ~O"J <... P l. '3 l,' 2. -z. ,. 3
In the City of '"P 0 (2 -r IT;J {Pc.. L (. S', County of I C I t?J / / (If (Y\ , State of Washington, Zip tf ~ (; j ; and legally 4
described as: LOT .5' E 'f:- e tt' III J r If In rr.1 ( 1-/4. .[)
I
I
5
6
7
DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Agreement (a) 'MlS' means the I ? 0 fL. T A- JJ U f.-{, l'~ Muffiple listing Ser- 8
vice/AssociationlBureau; and (b) 'sell' includes a conlractto sell; an exchange or contract to 'elchange; an option to purc ase; and/or a lease with option to purchase. 9
. .l I __ (\
AGENCYIDUAL AGENCY. Seller authonzes Broker to appoint -LJ t?r c-- t.::;::: ~. (!./-t IY\ \ -r 2- to act as Seller's listing 10
Agent(s). ills understood and agreed that this Agreement creates an agency relabonship with lisbng Agent(s) and Broker only, not with any other sales associates of Broker. 11
Any broker or salesperson, other than Broker or listing Agent, who procutes a prospective buyer for the Property will not be representing Seller and may represent the Buyer. 12
Accordingly, for the purposes ofthis Agreement, the term 'Broker" meansjliSting Agent(s) and listing Agenfs Broker or Designated Broker, unless expressly stated otherwise. 13
Seller agrees that if the Property IS sold to a buyer represented by one or Broker's salespersons other than listing Agent(s), then Seller consents to Broker acting as a dual 14
agent Seller further agrees that if the Property is sold to a buyer who listing Agent also represents, then Seller consents to listing Agent(s) and Broker acting as dual agents. 15
Seller acknowledges that a dual agent represents both parties to a tranSaction; that the parbes' interestln the transaction may differ and that a dual agent is not permitted 16
to give advice to either party to the detriment of the other party, promote or advocate the interest of either party over the other party, or diSclose to either party confidential 17
InformatJon from or concerning the other party If this Agreement is execJted on or after January 1, 1997, then Seller acknowledges receipt of the pamphlet entJtled "The Law 18
of Real Estate Agency". I 19
COMMISSION. If (a) Broker procures a Buyer on the terms In this Agreement, or on other terms acceptable to Seller, or (b) Seller directly or Indlrect1y or through any person 20
or entity other than Broker, dunng the term hereof, sells the Property; Jen Seller will pay Broker a commiSSion of (fill in one and strike the other) 21
- I / {) % of the sales price, or $ . Further, if 22
Seller shan, wrthin _days (180 if not filled In) after the exptratlOfl of this Agr~, sell the Property to any person to whose attention ~ was brought ttvough the SIgns, advertising 23
or other actlOll of Broker, or on Information secured dorectly or indirectly from 'or through Broker, during the term of thIS Agreement, then SeUer will pay Broker the above commission. 24
Provided, that if a commission IS paid to a member of MlS In conjunctlOfl ~h a sale, the amount of commission payable to Broker shall be Ilm~ed to the amount of commission 25
which would have been payable pursuant to this Agreement less any commikion so paid to another member of MLS. Provided further, that if Seller cancels this Agreement w~hout 26
legal cause, Seller may be liable for clamages Incurred by Broker as a result10f cancellation, regardless of whether Seller pays a commission to another MLS member. 27
I
KEYBOX. Broker is authorized to Install a keybox on the Property. Such keybox may be opened by a master key held by all members of MLS and their salespeople. A master 28
key also may be held by affiliated third parties such as inSpectors and appraisers who cannot have access to the Property without Broker's prior approval which will not be 29
given without Broker first making reasonable efforts to obtain Seller's approval. SO
SELLER'S WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS. Seller warranJ that he/she has the right to sell the Property on the terms herein and that the Property information 31
on the addinonal pages to this Agreement is correct. Further, Seller repre~ents that to the best of Seller's knowledge, there are no structures or boundary indicators that either 32
encroach on adjacent property or on this Property. Seller understands that Broker and other members of MLS will make representations to prospective buyers based on the 33
Property information on the addrtional pages to this Agreement Seller agrees to indemnify and hold Broker and other members of MLS harmless in the event the foregoing 34
warranties and representations are incorrecL I 35
CLOSING COSTS. Seller agrees to furnish and pay for a buyer's policy of tiUe insurance showing marketable title to the Property. Seller agrees to pay real estate excise 36
tax and one-half of any escrow fees or such porbon of escrow fees and any other fees or charges as provided by law in the case of FHA or VA financed sale. Rent, taxes, 37
interest. reserves, assumed encumbrances, homeowner fees and insunlnce are to be prorated between Seller and Buyer as of the date of closing. 38
I
MULTIPLE LISTING. Broker shall cause this listing to be published by"'lS. Broker may refer this listing to any other multiple listing service at Broker's discretion. Broker 39
shall cooperate with all other members of MlS, or of a multiple listing sefVIce to which this listing is referred, in working toward the sale of the Property. Regardless of whelher 40
a cooperating MlS member Is the agent of the Buyer, the Seller, neither ot both, the member shall be entitled to receive the selling office's share of the commiSSion. SELLER 41
UNDERSTANDS AND AGREES THAT THE PROPERTY INFORMATION ON THE ADDITIONAl PAGES TO THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE GIVEN TO PROSPECTIVE 42
BUYERS AND TO OTHER COOPERATING MEMBERS OF MLS WHO DO NOT REPRESENT THE SELLERAND,IN SOME INSTANCES, MAY REPRESENT THE BUYER. 43
IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT MlS IS NOT A PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT AND ITS SOLE FUNCTION IS TO FURNISH THE DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION ON THE 44
ADDITIONAL PAGES OF THIS LISTING TO ITS MEMBERS, WITHOUTI'ERIFICA TION AND WITHOUT ASSUMING ANY RESPONSIBilITY FOR SUCH INFORMATION 45
OR IN RESPECT TO THIS AGREEMENT. I 46
DISCLAIMER/SELLER'S INSURANCE. Neither Broker, MlS. nor any members of MlS or of any multiple listing service to which this listing is referred shall be responsible 47
for loss, theft, or damage of any nature or kind whatsoever to the Properly ardlor to any personal properly therein, including entry by the master key to the keybox and/or at open 48
houses. Seller is advised to notify Seller's insurance company that tlJe Property is listed for sale and ascertain that the Seller has adequate Insurance coverage. 49
If the Property Is to be vacant during all or part of the term of this listing, Seller should request that a "vacancy clausew be added to Seller's Insurance policy. 50
BROKER'S RIGHT TO MARKET THE PROPERTY. Seller shall not comlit any act which materially impairs Broker's ability to market and sell the Property under the terms 51
of this Agreement In the event of breach of the foregoing, Seller agree~ to pay Broker a commission in the above amount, or at the above rate applied to the lisbng price 52
herein, whichever is app6cable. Broker shall be enbtled to show the Property at all reasonable times Broker need not submit to Seller any offers to lease, rent, execute an 53
option to purchase, or enter into any agreement other than for immediat4 sale of the Property. 54
I
REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Unless S,eller is exempt under RCW 64.06, Seller shall provide to Broker as soon as reasonably practicable 55
a completed and signed 'Real Property Transfer Disclosure Statement' (WAR. Form 0-5 or NWMlS Form 17). Seller agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Broker harmless 56
from and against any and all claims that the information Seller provides on WAR. Form 0-5 or NWMlS Form 17 is inaccurate. 57
DAMAGES IN THE EVENT OF BUYER'S BREACH. In the event Seller r~tains earnest money as liquidated damages on Buyer's breach, any costs advanced or committed 58
by Broker on Seller's behalf shall be paid therefrom and the balance dlvi~ed equally between Seller and Broker. 59
I
ATTORNEYS' FEES. In the event either party employs an attorney to ~nforce any terms of this Agreement and is successful, the other party agrees to pay reasonable 60
attorneys' fees. In the event of trial, the successful party shall be entlll~d to an award of attorneys' fees and expenses; the amount of the attorneys' fees and expenses 61
shall be fixed by the court. The venue of any suit shall be the county In which the property is located. 62
I : , .....
{]. Cs ",It r.r lJ ~ 1~1EI~/
I I SEllER
I
Are the undersigned the sole owner(s)? 0 YES 0 NO 63
1.
2.
3.
4.
e5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
e2.
DATED THIS OJ OF
BROKER (COMPANY) ~ u./ ({ I
64
BY
65
Pg. ~ or~
Sales Price:
Tenns:
Location:
A crea !:e:
Zonin!::
Utilities:
_~) n-~ " ~ p ~ A f
~75JD()O
~ f.\& i~
EXCLUSIVE SALE AND LISTING AGREEMENT
.
(!JfC
I~ ; viI) vJ CI J
/0 f
VJo{J/r:'U Z":Z,t. fLt~
4 ..) PI i:. A eV' e->
---fJ) fY\ ('{\ ev i\C( { (i (L "t ( B-1 q l-
~ f \..1 ev) 1.JC1T~ ILl f @vJ ~ (L { r€L-~ PHO ttJC-
Amenities: P~J(J tOeA J~ I }J t- j...f 7"'V O~II- r: ('p..J.r.se
,
Taxes: .i:J- e VY\ p T
Restrictions: C, I rY Z 0,0 i ~ &
Tax Parcel ##:
Oft} '? 0 I!), 1l/qO [) ()
.
TODOuaphv: L f U f 1-) .s-l 0 pe
Directions:
SELLER: L
SELLER:
~ l:\i~/~uJ<~ ~~I_I j\~,,~
AbJ\ {__t)l)~ e'- \ I
lh...(.5 \/ -Z"7..- ( t
fJ,J
DATE:,i
.
DA TE:
86
Whether Buying or Selling. Always Call JACF. for LaDd!
Coldwell Banker Uptown Realty, Port Angdes, Washington 98362
.
.
.
.
IV~
@
EXHmIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(,0
c.o
~
o
N
--:I
~
l'V
W
5OO115U 01
I
I !
I
A-I
87
.
.
.
88
.
.
.
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G T 0 IN, U. S. A.
I
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
I
DA TE:
March 5, 2002
To:
MA YOR WIGGINS AND CITi COUNCIL
Brad Collins, Community ievelopment Director~
SERENITY HOUSE REZONE REZ 02-01
FROM:
SUBJECT:
I
Summary: Serenity House of Clallam County, a nonprofit agency providing shelter for the
homeless, has requested a rezone of 4.31 abres of property from RS-9 Residential Single Family
to RMD Residential Medium Density. Th~ subject property is located along 18th Street
immediately west of two existing multi-failiily assisted housing projects, one of which is also
owned by Serenity House. Since the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map identifies the site as in
an imprecise margin between low and medium density residential designations, the policies of
the Comp Plan should determine whether br not to approve the rezone. Reasonable
interpretations of the policies have led to dpposing recommendations from the Planning
Commission and the Department of Community Development, and the City Council needs to
I
choose which interpretation of policies and circumstances provides for a stronger decision on the
rezone application.
Recommendation: Following close ~f the public hearing, the City Council may wish to
continue their deliberations on the Serenity House rezone application to the next regular
meeting on March 19, 2002. Although tHe Planning Commission recommends denial of REZ
02-01 as noted in the attached excerpts odheir February 13th and 27th minutes, the Department of
Community Development recommends approval ofREZ 02-01, citing the 29 findings and 14
conclusions with the attached draft ordina~ce rezoning the subject property from RS-9 to RMD.
I
Backeround I Analysis:
The applicant has requested a change in the Zoning map designation of a 4.31 acre
rectangular parcel located north of 18th StreJt and the William R. Fairchild International Airport from
Residential, Single Family (RS-9) to ResidJntial, Medium Density (RMD). The subject property is
legally describ~d as Lots 1 and 2 .of Sh01 Plat recorded in Short Plats, Page 57, under Clall~m
County Recordmg No. 531689, bemg a shbrt plat of the west half of Suburban Lot 102, TownSIte
of Port Angeles; except that portion conveYed to Chester E. Nelson, by deed Recorded August 22,
1983, under Clallam County Recording N6. 546116. The application is attached.
89
City Council Memo - REZ 02-01
March 5, 2002
Page 2
The application is for a rezone of property and not for approval of any specific, subsequent
development that may be an allowed land use according to the Zoning Code for that zone. The
rezone addresses potential land uses allowed if the property is rezoned.
The proposal consists of two lots that are 188,074.28 square feet in size and undeveloped at
this time. The site is located in the Northwest Planning Area of the City, and the Northwest Planning
Area has the largest segment of undeveloped residential land in the City. The Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map designates the area as a margin between Low Density Residential (LDR) and Medium
Density Residential (MDR).
The map's land use designations are intended to show areas where general land use types are
allowed. The area between land use designations should be considered an imprecise margin in order
to provide flexibility in determining the boundary of such areas. When determining appropriate
zoning designations for an area near a margin, the goals, policies, and objectives of the Land Use
Element should take precedence. Therefore, in this case where the Comp Plan Land Use Map is not
clear, the staff analysis must specifically rely on the most relevant Comp Plan goals, policies, and
objectives.
The properties to the east of the subject site are designated, zoned, and developed for medium
density multiple family residential uses, including the Serenity House Evergreen Family Village.
The properties to the west and north of the subject site are designated, zoned, but sparsely developed
for low density single family residential uses. The properties to the south across 18th Street are
designated, zoned, and developed for industrial uses as the William R. Fairchild International Airport
and industrial park. Neither 18t\ "N," nor "0" Streets are fully developed, although the north side
of18th Street east of the subject site is improved with curb, gutter, and sidewalks. The right-of-way
for 16th Street is not improved abutting the subject property.
First Maior Issue: Is there substantial evidence that 18th Street, which provides the primary access
to the subject site, will not meet prescribed City street standards and thusfail to provide for safe
vehicular and pedestrian traffic?
The subject site is served by 18th Street, which is a designated arterial that is only partially
improved with sidewalks serving the multi-family housing developments east of the subject property.
Clallam Transit provides bus service along 18th Street with bus stops in the near vicinity. Port
Angeles School District No. 121 also provides school bus service to the area, and 18th Street is not
designated as a school walking route at this location. The level of service standard for traffic along
W. 18th Street is at or above LOS D and therefore meets the City's concurrency standards. Neither
the comments of the City's Public Works, Fire, and Police Departments nor the SEP A Determination
of NonSignificance (DNS) issued for the proposed rezone identified deficiencies in the street
conditions which would not meet the City's urban service standards once improvements required
with a future development permit are made. If warranted, a traffic study would normally be done
at the time of development of a particular project, when the specific impacts of that project could be
better determined. In this case, the SEP A review was done for both the rezone to RMD and the
permitting of an emergency shelter, and the proposed actions were not found to warrant a traffic
study. If the proposed emergency shelter were not to go forward after the rezone was approved and
another medium density residential development project subsequently was proposed, a new SEP A
review would be required to look at the impacts of the new project, and a traffic study could be
warranted then. At this time, the public record for this rezone decision does not provide substantial
evidence of a significant traffic safety problem on 18th Street related to the proposed actions.
90
.
.
.
.
.
.
City Council Memo - REZ 02-01
March 5, 2002
Page 3
Second Maior Issue: Has there been a change in circumstances wlzich supports a rezone of the
subject property from RS-9 to RMD, sinck the zoning was last established for the area?
The following analysis addresses I the ongoing need for land zoned for multiple family
residential development. Several previous studies and inventories oflands and land uses have shown
I
that there is a relative shortage of multiple family zoned land compared to single family zoned land
within the City limits. The most recent labd use analysis in Port Angeles was summarized in the
Community Profile Section of the Comprellensive Plan. This section stated that there were 12 acres
of buildable areas zoned multiple family r6sidential, while there were 491 acres of buildable areas
I
zoned low density residential. In 1995, the lower density residential zoning comprised
approximately 46% of the total land base rithin the City limits, as compared to 4% of the higher
density residential zoning. Based on this amalysis the Zoning Map was changed to add 139 acres of
mostly buildable Medium Density Residen~ial (RMD) zoning to the available acreage and to subtract
the same 139 acres from RS-9 Residen~ial Single Family. This additional RMD zoned land
increased the higher density residential ac~eage from 4 to 6.3% and similarly decreased the lower
I
density residential acreage from 46 to 43.6%. Annexations to the City since 1995 have added more
RS-9 zoned lands to the total. Considering/only the vacant buildable lands (approximately 400 acres
of RS to 100 acres of RMD), the availability of land remains in favor of lower density residential
zones by about a 4 to 1 ratio. I
There have been minimal changes in the City's development trends or patterns in the second
half of the decade of the 1990's. The Clallk County Housing Needs Assessment (1999) indicated
that there were 1,878 multi-family rental uhits in 1998. According to the Washington State Office
of Financial Management, the City's April 2000, official population estimates were based on 78%
I
single family and 22% multi-family housing units with a declining household size. The trend in
single family and multi-family housing pe~centages in other communities also indicates increasing
needs for multi-family zoned land. Recent analyses of the 2000 US Census data show for the first
time that nonfamily households represent allarger percentage of households than family with children
households in suburban as well as urban ateas and that family without children households are the
I
largest of the three types of households. These changes in circumstances continue to follow a trend
where new multi-family housing needs a~e greater in most communities, including Port Angeles,
than for new single family housing. More evidence of this trend in Port Angeles from 1996 through
-- I
2001 can be found in the number of compl~ted housing starts. In the last five years, there were 343
multi-family housing units completed in cbmparison to 141 single family housing units in the City
of Port Angeles. The construction rate ofrhulti-family housing to single family housing was 2.4 to
1, the opposite of the vacant buildable larid ratio for multi-family to single family in the area west
of"N" St, where there is 87 acres ofRMDlto 209 acres ofRS-9 or a 1 to 2.3 ratio of multiple family
to single family zoned land. The public record for this rezone decision provides substantial evidence
of a change in circumstances supporting Ithe continued trend in greater housing needs for multi-
family housing in the community of Port J\ngeles.
I
Another change in circumstances that also relates to development that has and has not taken
I
place on the west side of town since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1994. The policies
adopted in 1994 anticipated a faster growtij rate, particularly in the outlying areas of the City like the
west side. However, since 1996 approxim~tely 100 lots of newly subdivided land for single family
residential development on the west side bftown have not been sold or had houses built on them.
The street improvements have also been sl,bw in coming, due in part to major economic downturns
in the City's economy, particularly with the closure of the Rayonier Mill in 1997. Consequently,
policies and capital improvement plans f6r th9<lomp Plan have not implemented a completion of
City Council Memo - REZ 02-01
March 5, 2002
Page 4
the westside circulation system. The policies and capital improvement plans have not been changed,
but the timing of implementation has been put out into the future. The change in growth rates from
fast to slow has simply extended the time it is expected to take for new housing development and
street improvements per the Comp Plan policies and Capital Facilities Plan to be done. This slower
growth rate change in circumstances has greatly affected development throughout the City.
.
Third Maior Issue: Is the proposed rezone consistency with the Comprehensive Plan policies?
Transitional housing for the homeless is a special housing need that is given specific attention
in the Comprehensive Plan but requires a conditional use permit in the Zoning Code. The 18th Street
district has all the conditions available for this special housing need in place such as public transit,
an arterial street, vacant affordable land, and a non'-profit service provider. A residential
neighborhood is not established along 18th Street, since the area is still in the process of being
developed with a mix of housing types and densities. Much of the outlying areas of the City of Port
Angeles where there is the larger percentage of vacant buildable land is zoned either RS-9 or RMD.
The desired urban design of the City places RS-7 and RHD residential zoned areas more toward the
center of the City where the streets are more completely improved in a grid system that facilities
more compact and higher density housing development whether single family or multi-family. The
concerns about the developing circulation system noted in the Comprehensive Plan policies,
particularly for the west side of town, are consistent with the evolving land use pattern that was
recognized when the RMD zoning was introduced in 1995. This is a primary reason why the west
side of town has so much RS-9 and RMD zoning and little RS-7 and RHD zoning.
.
Fourth Major Issue: Does the proposed rezone serve public interest?
As required by the Zoning Code and case law, certain criteria are required to be met for the
approval of rezones, which includes consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, consistency with the
Zoning Code, including maintaining the validity, integrity and purpose and intent of the zones as
well as avoiding spot zones, and demonstration that there has been a change in the land use needs
since the area was previously zoned. The consistency with the Comprehensive Plan goals and
policies and with purposes of the Zoning Code and the zones in question were reviewed in both the
February 13 and 27 staff reports. While reasonable interpretations of Comp Plan policies can be
made for and against the rezone, a stronger case can be made that the proposed rezone is consistent
with the Comp Plan, particularly the land use and housing policies, which directly related to medium
density residential and special housing needs such as an emergency shelter. The proposal, which
consists of two properties, does not meet the test of a "spot zone," since it can be found to be
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and contiguous with existing RMD zoning. The need for
multi-family housing has been identified, and such housing has characteristics which make it a
transitional use between more intensive uses such as airport/industrial and less intensive low density
residential land uses. Based on these needs for additional multi-family zoned land in the City of Port
Angeles and the presence of all the conditions (including an arterial street, public transit, a
developing neighborhood/district, vacant affordable land, and an emergency shelter service provider)
which support medium density housing as well as this special housing need, the proposed rezone is
found to be beneficial for the community as a whole, compatible with the desired urban design of
the City, and in the public interest.
.
92
.
.
.
City Council Memo - REZ 02-01
March 5, 2002
Page 5
PUBLIC COMMENTS
The City received a written comment letter from William and Jeanie Sallee on February 7,
2002, which is attached. The Salees' comrhents correctly identify that the rezone issue is separate
from the applicant Serenity House and tHe proposed conditional use permit. The focus of the
comments on the land use analysis is also cjbrrect, and there is little dispute of the facts concerning
LDR/RS-9 area designations and MDR/RMD area designations west of"N" Street. The main facts
being 209 acres of RS-9 and 87 acres of ro1D or a 2.3 to 1 ratio of single family to multiple family
zoned land area west of"N" Street. The February 13th Staff Report response is duplicated here for
ease of reference during the public hearing.
This 2.3 to 1 ratio compared to the 4 to 1 ratio for the whole City is an application of a small
area analysis to a factor derived for understdnding land use for the whole area of the City. Ifwe were
to apply the same small area analysis to arly neighborhood or district throughout the City, no area
would have a 4: 1 ratio, and most small are~s would have a much greater divergence from 4: 1 than
2.3: 1. For example, the Lower Cherry Hill ~eighborhood would be 0: 1; the Lower and Upper Cherry
I
Hill district would be closer to 1: 1; the residential neighborhood above the High School would be
I
1 :0; and so on. Applying the City-wide 4: 1 ratio in this context shows that the proposed rezone is
consistent with the conclusion that there is J greater need for multiple family zoned land for the City
as a whole. I
The evolution of the City's land de~elopment manifests a City-wide pattern that has a central
core of RS-7/RHD established neighborhoods, where existing development resists major changes
in the single family/multiple family ratio bJt where the ratio is the highest for multiple family. The
west and east sides of the City and Urbah Growth Areas demonstrate a land use pattern of RS-
9/RMD developing neighborhoods, where there is much more vacant, buildable land. Since RMD
zoning is relatively new in comparison to t~e other residential zones, it has been designated mostly
to these developing west and east side pmfts of town and reflects the locations of existing mobile
home park developments as well as a ner policy to provide for lower density, multiple family
zoning. RMD density is 1 dwelling unit per 3500 square feet of land area compared to 1 dwelling
I
unit per 1000 square feet of land area for RHD and 1 dwelling unit per 7000 to 9000 square feet for
RS-7 or RS-9. The conclusion to be drawh from the City's land development pattern and housing
density is that the proposed rezone is a nodnal evolution of the city's growth management policies
and not a significant alteration of the patt~rn or density in the 18th Street district. To the contrary,
the proposed rezone is a logical extension! of the existing RMD development taking place on 18th
Street adjacent to the Airport Industrial Pa~k in a district where a much greater number of multiple
family housing units have been built in reGent years than single family residences.
Attachments: Ordinance
Findings and ConclUSIOns ,
Planning CommIssIon Draft Minutes Ex:cerpts of February 13 and 27,2002, meetings
Staff Reports for February 13 and 27, 2002, Planning CommissIon meetings as corrected
Seremty House REZ 02-01 ApplicatIon I
Letter from WIlliam and Jeame Sallee dated February 7, 2002
93
.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, rezoning
property consisting of 4.31 acres of land located immediately north of the
William R. Fairchild International Airport in Suburban Lot 102, Townsite
of Port Angeles, from RS-9, Residential Single Family, to RMD,
Residential Medium Density.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Port Angeles has held a public
hearing and recorded its recommendation to the City Council in the Planning Commission minutes
of February 13,2002; and
WHEREAS, the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (Chapter
43.21C RCW) have been met; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after conducting a public hearing and considering
the Planning Commission's recommendation, finds that there has been a change in circu~stances
since the current zoning designation was adopted and that said rezone is in the best interest of the
City and its citizens and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan;
.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. The Official Zoning Map, Ordinance No. 2801, as amended, is hereby
amended to change the zoning of the following described property from RS-9, Residential Single
Family, to RMD, Residential Medium Density, as shown in the attached Exhibit A:
Lots 1 and 2 of the short plat recorded in Short Plats, Page 57,
under Clallam County Recording No. 531689, being a short plat
of the west half of Suburban Lot 102, Townsite of Port Angeles;
except that portion conveyed to Chester E. Nelson by deed
Recorded August 22, 1983, under Clallam County recording
number 546116.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to attach a copy of this Ordinance to
the Official Zoning Map and to file a certified copy with the Clallam County Auditor and the
Clallam County Assessor.
1
.
94
.
Section 3. - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five (5) days
following the date of its publication by summary.
Section 4. - Severability If any provisions of this Ordinance or its application to
any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, or application of the
provisions of the Ordinance to other persons or circumstances, is not affected.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of
said Council held on the 5th day of March, 2002.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk
.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary
F IORDlNANCES&RESOLUTIONS\2002-06 wpd
2
.
95
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF
SERENITY HOUSE REZONE - REZ 02-01:
.
Based on the information provided in the public record and any written comments received during
the public comment period, and the Planning Commission's deliberation, the City of Port Angeles
Planning Commission makes a recommendation of approval ofREZ 02-01 based on the following
29 findings and 14 conclusions:
Findings:
1. The applicant requests a change in the Zoning map designation of a 4.31 acre rectangular
parcel located on north of 18th Street and the William R. Fairchild International Airport from
Residential, Single Family (RS-9) to Residential, Medium Density (RMD).
2. The proposal consists of two lots that are 188,074.28 square feet in size and undeveloped at
this time.
3. The site is located in the Northwest Planning Area of the City, and the Northwest Planning
Area has the largest segment of undeveloped residential land in the City.
4.
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the area as a margin between Low
Density Residential (LDR) and Medium Density Residential (MDR).
.
5. The properties to the east of the subject site are designated, zoned, and developed for
medium density multiple family residential uses, including Serenity House family housing.
6. The properties to the west and north of the subject site are designated, zoned, but sparsely
developed for low density single family residential uses.
7. The properties to the south across 18th Street are designated, zoned, and developed for
industrial uses as the William R. Fairchild International Airport and industrial park.
8. The Comprehensive Plan has been reviewed with respect to the proposed rezone, and the
most relevant are as follows: Growth Management Element Goal A, Land Use Element Goal
A, Policies A.1 and A.2, Objective A.1, Goal B, Goal C, Policies C.1-CA, Transportation
Element Goal A, Goal B, Policies B.9 and B.1 0, Objective B.8, Housing Element Goal A,
Policies A.1 and A.7, Goal B, Policies B.1, B.2, B.6, B.9, Objectives B.1 and B.2, Capital
Facilities Element Goal A, Policies A.1, A.2, A-3, A.6, A.9, and A-B, Goal B, Policies B.1
and B-2.
.
96
.
.
.
Seremty House REZ 02-01 Findings & ConclusIOns
March 5. 2002
Page 2
9.
Transitional housing for the homeless is a special housing need that is given specific
attention in the Comprehensive Plan but requires a conditional use permit in the Zoning
Code. The 18th Street district has all the conditions (including an arterial street, public
transit, a developing neighborhood/district, vacant affordable land, and an emergency shelter
service provider) available to support medium density housing as well as this special housing
need.
10. The Comprehensive Plan policies adopted in 1994 anticipated a faster growth rate,
particularly in the outlying areas of the City like the west side. However, since 1996
approximately 100 lots of newly subdivided land for single family residential development
on the west side of town have not been sold or had houses built on them. The street
improvements have also been slow in coming, due in part to major economic downturns in
the City's economy, particularly with the closure of the Rayonier Mill in 1997. The change
in growth rates from fast to slow has greatly affected development throughout the City,
extending the time expected for new housing development and street improvements per the
Comp Plan policies and Capital Facilities Plan to take place.
11. The subject site is served by 18th Street, which is a designated arterial and is only partially
improved to City arterial street standards with curb, gutter, and sidewalks serving the multi-
family housing developments east of the subject property.
12.
Clallam Transit provides bus service along 18th Street with bus stops in the near vicinity.
Because the applicant has another nearby location where Serenity House provides other
housing and social services, there are already existing services which may be utilized.
13. The location adjacent to the airport is a concern due to potential noise conflicts with
residential activities.
14. Multiple family housing may be constructed with greater soundproofing as a normal part of
its design.
15. Emergency shelter and transitional housing for the homeless is a special housing need that
is given specific attention in the Comprehensive Plan but requires a conditional use permit
in the Zoning Code.
16. The 18th Street district has all the conditions available for this special housing need in place
such as public transit, an arterial street, vacant affordable land, and a non-profit service
provider.
17. A residential neighborhood is not established along 18th St., since the area is still in the
process of being developed with a mix of housing types and densities.
97
Seremty House REZ 02-01 Findings & ConclusIOns
March 5, 2002
Page 3
18.
The purpose of the RMD zone is to allow for a mix of single family, duplexes, and
apartments at a density of greater than single family neighborhoods but less than the RHD
zone.
.
19. If approved to RMD zoning, a total of 53 dwelling units compared to 20 dwelling units under
RS-9 zoning could be permitted on the 188,074.28 square feet of area.
20. Per Port Angeles Municipal Code 17.96.100, "In determining if an amendment to these
regulations is needed, the City Council shall give due consideration to the proper relationship
of such amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and the entire Zoning Regulations; it being
the intent to retain the integrity and validity of the zones herein described and to avoid any
isolated spot zoning changes in the Zoning Map."
21.
In 1995, the lower density residential zoning comprised approximately 46% of the total land
base within the City limits, as compared to 4% of the higher density residential zoning.
Based on this analysis the Zoning Map was changed to add 139 acres of mostly buildable
Medium Density Residential (RMD) zoning to the available acreage and to subtract the same
139 acres from RS-9 Residential Single Family. This additional RMD zoned land increase
the higher density residential acreage from 4 to 6.3% and similarly decreased the lower
density residential acreage from 46 to 43.6%. Annexations to the City since 1995 have
added more RS-9 zoned lands to the total. Considering only the vacant buildable lands
(approximately 400 acres of RS to 100 acres of RMD), the availability of land remains in
favor of lower density residential zones by about a 4 to 1 ratio.
.
22. There have been minimal changes in the City's development trends or patterns in the second
half of the decade of the 1990's. The Clallam County Housing Needs Assessment (1999)
indicated that there were 1,878 multi-family rental units in 1998. According to the
Washington State Office of Financial Management, the City's April 2000, official population
estimates were based on 78% single family and 22% multi-family housing units with a
declining household size. The trend in single family and multi-family housing percentages
in other communities also indicates increasing needs for multi-family zoned land.
23. Evidence of the trend showing that new multi-family housing needs continue to be greater
in Port Angeles than for new single family housing can be found in the number of completed
housing starts from 1996 through 2001. In the last five years, there were 343 multi-family
housing units completed in comparison to 141 single family housing units in the City of Port
Angeles.
24. The Public Works and Fire Departments and the Building Division made no comments on
the proposed rezone.
25.
The City's State Environmental Policy Act Responsible Official adopted the Environmental
Impact Statement, Addendum, and Supplemental EIS issued for the City of Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1993-1995 and issued a Determination of Non Significance
(#965) for the proposal per WAC 197-11-355 on October 9, 2001. There are no
98
.
.
.
.
Serenity House REZ 02-01 Findings & ConclusIOns
March 5, 2002
Page 4
environmentally sensitive areas located on or adjacent to the subject property. Subsequent
development of the properties would require compliance with various chapters of the Port
Angeles Municipal Code, as it applies.
26.
The level of service standard for traffic along W. 18th Street is at or above LOS D and
therefore meets the City's concurrency standards. Neither the comments of the City's Public
Works, Fire, and Police Departments nor the SEPA Determination of NonSignificance
(DNS) issued for the proposed rezone identified deficiencies in the street conditions which
would not meet the City's urban service standards once improvements required with a future
development permit are made. If warranted, a traffic study would normally be done at the
time of development of a particular proj ect, when the specific impacts of that proj ect could
be better determined. In this case, the SEP A review was done for both the rezone to RMD
and the permitting of an emergency shelter, and the proposed actions were not found to
warrant a traffic study.
27.
Public Notice was given on January 18, 2002, identifying a written comment deadline of
February 7, 2002, for consideration in the staff report to the Planning Commission for a
meeting date of February 13,2002, on the proposed. The City received a written comment
letter from William and Jeanie Sallee on February 7, 2002.
28.
There are approximately 209 acres ofRS-9 and 87 acres ofRMD or a 2.3 to 1 ratio of single
family to multiple family zoned land area west of "N" Street.
29. Public Notice was given on February 15,2002, that the City Council will conduct a public
hearing on March 5, 2002, to consider a request of Serenity House of Clallam County to
rezone 4.31 acres of property on West 18th St. from RS-9 Residential Single Family to RMD
Residential Medium Density. This site specific rezone application is limited to one "open
record" public hearing before the City Council, per R.C.W. 36.70B, Local Project Review
("The Regulatory Reform Act").
Conclusions:
1. The application is for a rezone only which addresses all potential land uses allowed within
that zone and not approval for any specific, subsequent development that may be an allowed
land use according to the Zoning Code.
2.
The map's land use designations are intended to show areas where general land use types are
allowed. The area between land use designations should be considered an imprecise margin
in order to provide flexibility in determining the boundary of such areas. When determining
appropriate zoning designations for an area near a margin, the goals, policies, and objectives
of the Land Use Element should take precedence. Therefore, in this case where the Comp
Plan Land Use Map is not clear, analysis of the rezone must specifically rely on the most
relevant Comp Plan goals, policies, and objectives.
99
Serenzty House REZ 02-01 Findings & ConclusIOns
March 5, 2002
Page 5
3.
Rezone REZ 02-01 for Serenity House is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan
Growth Management, Land Use, and Housing Elements as described in Finding #8.
4. A residential neighborhood is not established along 18th Street, since the area is still in the
process of being developed with a mix of housing types and densities. Much ofthe outlying
areas ofthe City of Port Angeles where there is the larger percentage of vacant buildable land
is zoned either RS-9 or RMD. The desired urban design ofthe City places RS-7 and RHD
residential zoned areas more toward the center of the City where the streets are more
completely improved in a grid system that facilities more compact and higher density
housing development whether single family or multi-family.
5. The Comp Plan accepts that districts may be composed primarily of residential uses of a
uniform density and that a healthy, viable district should be composed of residential uses of
varying densities which may be augmented by subordinate and compatible uses. Since the
surrounding existing development includes airport/industrial and multiple family land uses
as well as single family residential uses, 18th Street is a district within the Northwest
Planning Area of the City.
6.
The City should ensure that the supply of land will be sufficient for all housing needs
including the provision of transitional and temporary housing for the homeless and/or
displaced families.
7.
The 2.3 to 1 ratio of single family to multiple family zoned land area west of UN" Street 2.3
to 1 ratio compared to the 4 to 1 ratio for the whole City is an application of a small area
analysis to a factor derived for understanding land use for the whole area of the City. Ifwe
were to apply the same small area analysis to any neighborhood or district throughout the
City, no area would have a 4:1 ratio, and most small areas would have a much greater
divergence from 4:1 than 2.3:1. For example, the Lower Cherry Hill neighborhood would
be 0: 1; the Lower and Upper Cherry Hill district would be closer to 1: 1; the residential
neighborhood above the High School would be 1:0; and so on. Applying the City-wide 4:1
ratio in this context shows that the proposed rezone is consistent with the conclusion that
there is a greater need for multiple family zoned land for the City as a whole and is not
excessive for this smaller area of the City nor contrary to the desired urban design ofland
use and street system patterns.
8. The City's action on Rezone REZ 02-01 is consistent with the established procedures for
amending the Zoning Code as specified in P AMC 17.96.100.
9.
The need for multi-family housing has been identified and can be seen as a transitional use
between more intensive uses such as airport/industrial and less intensive low density
residential land uses. Based on these needs for additional multi-family zoned land in the
City of Port Angeles, the proposed rezone is found to be beneficial for the community as a
whole and compatible with the desired urban design of the City.
100
.
.
.
.
.
.
Serenity House REZ 02-01 Findings & ConclusIOns
March 5. 2002
Page 6
10.
At this time, the public record for this rezone decision does not provide substantial evidence
of a significant traffic safety problem on 18th Street related to the proposed actions.
11. The consistency with the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies and with purposes of the
Zoning Code and the zones in question were reviewed in both the February 13 and 27 staff
reports. While reasonable interpretations ofComp Plan policies can be made for and against
the rezone, a stronger case can be made that the proposed rezone is consistent with the Comp
Plan, particularly the land use and housing policies, which directly related to medium density
residential and special housing needs such as an emergency shelter.
12.
The proposal, which consists of two properties, does not meet the test of a "spot zone," since
it can be found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and contiguous with existing
RMD zoning. The need for multi- family housing has been identified, and such housing has
characteristics which make it a transitional use between more intensive uses such as
airport/industrial and less intensive low density residential land uses. Based on these needs
for additional multi-family zoned land in the City of Port Angeles and the presence of all the
conditions (including an arterial street, public transit, a developing neighborhood/district,
vacant affordable land, and an emergency shelter service provider) which support special
housing needs as well as medium density housing, the proposed rezone is found to be
beneficial for the community as a whole, compatible with the desired urban design of the
City, and in the public interest.
13.
The conclusion to be drawn from the City's land development pattern and housing density
is that the proposed rezone is a normal evolution of the city's growth management policies
and not a significant alteration of the pattern or density in the 18th Street district. To the
contrary, the proposed rezone is a logical extension ofthe existing RMD development taking
place on 18th Street adjacent to the Airport Industrial Park in a district where a much greater
number of multiple family housing units have been built in recent years than single family
residences.
14. Rezone REZ 02-01 is in the public use and interest and would increase the availability of
land for multi-family housing and possibly provide for emergency shelter, special housing
needs in the City.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of March 5, 2002.
Glen Wiggins, Mayor
Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk
101
Plannmg CommISSIOn Mmutes - February J 3. 2002
Page 9
PUBLIC MEETING
.
REZONE APPLICATION - REZ 02-01- SERENITY HOUSE. 2321 West
18th Street: Request for rezone of approximately 4.31 acres from RS-9
Residential Single Family, to RMD Residential Medium Density.
Community Development Director, Brad Collins, reviewed the staff s report
recommending approval of the rezone application. Commissioners Porter and Schramm asked
if there have been any change in circumstances since the earlier application (REZ 01-05) in
October, 2001, when the Commission recommended the City Council approve the rezone. Staff
answered that the City Council did not take an action on the earlier application due to a tie vote,
and the applicant is free to reapply at any time. Director Collins said that he did not believe there
had been a change in circumstances dealing with the property or the proposal.
Commissioner Schramm questioned Director Collins as to the disposition of the 139
acres rezoned in 1995 from residential to residential medium density. Mr. Collins estimated that
approximately 20% of the property has since been developed as medium density housing.
Commissioner Nutter asked when school walking routes are reviewed for adequacy. Mr.
Collins answered that no new school walking routes have been designated because there are no
new schools. The School District may review their walking routes every year. Commissioner
Hewins added that, although the subject area is along a school bus route and students are not
expected to school, students still walk and ride bicycles to school. New circumstances would .
need to be recognized to warrant a change in a designated school walking route. Mr. Collins
noted that development of the subject site will require sidewalk, curb, and gutter improvements
along the Eighteenth Street frontage of the site.
Commissioner Hewins asked ifthere have been any changes to the City's Transportation
Services and Facilities Plan (TSFP) where improvements are planned to Eighteenth Street. He
stated that, although industrial development usually brings improvements to an area, the Port of
Port Angeles has made it very clear that they do not plan to construct any improvements on the
south half of Eighteenth Street abutting their industrial property and have designed the Port's
industrial park to date such that improvements have not been required. Mr. Collins responded
that improvements to Eighteenth Street are not a main priority listing in the City's TSFP at this
point. For the past several years, infrastructure improvements, including sidewalks and a bus
stop, have been made by developers of the medium density housing developments that have
located adjacent to the subject property. This will probably be the only manner in which
developments are made in the area for some time.
Commissioner Hewins asked ifthere is sufficient infrastructure without improvements
to allow more intensive development in the Eighteenth Street area. He does not believe that the
existing infrastructure in the area is adequate to allow another medium density residential
development at this time. Mr. Collins indicated that Eighteenth Street meets the City's
concurrency requirements, which are at or above Level of Service (LOS) D.
Commissioner Philpott asked Mr. Collins if there are ways to set aside City funds to
make improvements such as sidewalks to identified neighborhoods. Director Collins responded
that the City specifies capital facilities that are needed in certain areas through the City's Capital .
Facilities Plan and sets development standards through the City's Urban Services and Guidelines
102
Plannmg CommISSIOn Mmutes - February 13, 2002
Page 10
.
manual. The City currently does not have a standard for continual sidewalks and only requires
development of sidewalks in areas that are designated as arterials and/or school walking routes.
Commissioner Hewins stated that the City should make improvements to areas such as
Eighteenth Street if development of the area is desired.
Commissioner Nutter asked if the City is planning to improve Eighteenth Street when
the landfill is converted to a transfer station. Mr. Collins responded that no improvements are
planned to Eighteenth Street at the present time. The City's Engineering Division has indicated
that the arterial street is adequate to handle the predicted increase in traffic. It is not anticipated
that a change in the hauling characteristics to and from the landfill or other existing or new land
uses in the area will adversely affect the capacity of the roadway.
Commissioner Schramm asked if there had been a change in the property since 1995 that
would make the property unsuitable for single family development. Director Collins noted that
there has been a change in household size identified in the 1990 Census. Single family
household size has decreased since the last housing needs assessment was done thereby causing
an increase in the need for medium density housing units.
Commissioner Porter asked if anything other than the drop in household size identified
in the census indicates a need for more medium density housing. Mr. Collins stated that the rate
of absorption of available medium density housing units indicates there is a need for more multi-
family housing than single family.
Commissioner Philpott noted that it is not unusual to plan for multi-family uses near
industrial areas. It is commonly done.
Commissioner Porter asked Serenity House Executive Director Dan Jacobs if specific
data is available which would indicate a general need for additional multi-family housing in the
City.
Dan Jacobs Executive Director for Serenity House, 2321 West Eighteenth Street,
answered that it is not affordable to put together single family residential housing for people who
are served by Serenity House. The type of housing that is needed for the services Serenity House
provides is multi-family group housing where various types of housing can be accommodated
in a consolidated area and where individualized services can be provided. There is a great need
for low income, permanent housing in the Port Angeles area. Hundreds of local low income
families cannot afford stable, clean, safe, affordable housing at this time. There may seem to be
a lot of available housing in the area, but most is not affordable to people in need.
Commissioner Hewins asked Mr. Jacobs if other sites had been considered. Mr. Jacobs
responded that originally other sites were looked into with a realtor but the subject property was
the most desirable given its location abutting other property developed for similar uses. The
subject property affords Serenity House the ability to consolidate its activities rather duplicate
them on a site in another neighborhood.
Commissioner Schramm stated that the Commission is not questioning the need for low
income housing but cannot consider convenience for the applicant or desire to increase the value
of a property as reasons for a rezone. The only consideration that may be made is whether or not
there is a need to create additional supply of land for a particular zone.
Commissioner Porter did not see any new circumstances that would warrant the rezone
as requested. lfthe City wants to see the area develop, it should improve Eighteenth Street such
that those increased densities and activities can be supported.
.
.
103
Planning CommIssIOn Minutes - February J 3, 2002
Page J J
Commissioner Norton moved to recommend approval of the rezone as proposed .
citing stafrs suggested findings and conclusions as follows:
Findings:
1. The applicant requests a change in the Zoning map designation of a 4.31 acre rectangular
parcel located on north of 18th Street and the William R. Fairchild International Airport
from Residential, Single Family (RS-9) to Residential, Medium Density (RMD).
2. The proposal consists of two lots that are 188,074.28 square feet in size and undeveloped
at this time.
3. The site is located in the Northwest Planning Area of the City, and the Northwest
Planning Area has the largest segment of undeveloped residential land in the City.
4. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the area as a margin between Low
Density Residential (LDR) and Medium Density Residential (MDR).
5. The properties to the east of the subject site are designated, zoned, and developed for
medium density multiple family residential uses, including Serenity House family
housing.
6.
The properties to the west and north of the subject site are designated, zoned, but
sparsely developed for low density single family residential uses.
.
7. The properties to the south across 18th Street are designated, zoned, and developed for
industrial uses as the William R. Fairchild International Airport and industrial park.
8. The Comprehensive Plan has been reviewed with respect to the proposed rezone, and the
most relevant are as follows: Growth Management Element Goal A, Land Use Element
Goal A, Policies Al and A2, Objective AI, Goal B, Goal C, Policies C.I-CA, Housing
Element Goal A, Policies Al and A7, Goal B, Policies B.l, B.2, B.6, B.9, Objectives
B.l and B.2.
9. The subject site is served by 18th Street, which is a designated arterial that is serving the
neighborhood well including the multi-family housing developments east of the subject
property.
10. Clallam Transit provides bus service along 18th Street with bus stops in the near vicinity.
Because the applicant has another nearby location where Serenity House provides other
housing and social services, there are already existing services which may be utilized.
11.
The location adjacent to the airport is a concern due to potential noise conflicts with
residential activities.
.
104
.
.
.
Planmng CommiSSion Mmutes - February J 3, 2002
Page J 2
12.
Multiple family housing may be constructed with greater soundproofing as a normal part
of its design.
13. Transitional housing for the homeless is a special housing need that is given specific
attention in the Comprehensive Plan but requires a conditional use permit in the Zoning
Code.
14. The 18th Street district has all the conditions available for this special housing need in
place such as public transit, an arterial street, vacant affordable land, and a non-profit
service provider.
15. A residential neighborhood is not established along 18th St., since the area is still in the
process of being developed with a mix of housing types and densities.
16. The purpose of the RMD zone is to allow for a mix of single family, duplexes, and
apartments at a density of greater than single family neighborhoods but less than the
RHD zone.
17. If approved to RMD zoning, a total of 53 dwelling units compared to 20 dwelling units
under RS-9 zoning could be permitted on the 188,074.28 square feet of area.
18.
Per Port Angeles Municipal Code 17.96.100, "In determining if an amendment to these
regulations is needed, the City Council shall give due consideration to the proper
relationship of such amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and the entire Zoning
Regulations; it being the intent to retain the integrity and validity of the zones herein
described and to avoid any isolated spot zoning changes in the Zoning Map."
19. In 1995, the lower density residential zoning comprised approximately 46% ofthe total
land base within the City limits, as compared to 4% of the higher density residential
zoning. Based on this analysis the Zoning Map was changed to add 139 acres of mostly
buildable Medium Density Residential (RMD) zoning to the available acreage and to
subtract the same 139 acres from RS-9 Residential Single Family. This additional RMD
zoned land increase the higher density residential acreage from 4 to 6.3% and similarly
decreased the lower density residential acreage from 46 to 43.6%. Annexations to the
City since 1995 have added more RS-9 zoned lands to the total. Considering only the
vacant buildable lands (approximately 400 acres of RS to 100 acres of RMD), the
availability ofland remains in favor oflower density residential zones by about a 4 to 1
ratio.
20.
There have been minimal changes in the City's development trends or patterns in the
second half ofthe decade ofthe 1990's. The Clallam County Housing Needs Assessment
(1999) indicated that there were 1,878 multi-family rental units in 1998. According to
the Washington State Office of Financial Management, the City's April 2000, official
population estimates were based on 78% single family and 22% multi-family housing
105
Planning CommissIOn Minutes - February 13.2002
Page 13
units with a declining household size. The trend in single family and multi-family .
housing percentages in other communities also indicates increasing needs for multi-
family zoned land.
21. The Public Works and Fire Departments and the Building Division have made no
comments on the proposed rezone.
22. The City's State Environmental Policy Act Responsible Official adopted the
Environmental Impact Statement, Addendum, and Supplemental EIS issued for the City
of Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1993-1995 and issued a Determinationof
NonSignificance (#965) for the proposal per WAC 197-11-355 on October 9,2001.
There are no environmentally sensitive areas located on or adjacent to the subject
property. Subsequent development of the properties would require compliance with
various chapters of the Port Angeles Municipal Code, as it applies.
23. Public Notice was given on January 18, 2002, identifying a written comment deadline
of February 7, 2002, for consideration in the staff report to the Planning Commission for
a meeting date of February 13, 2002, on the proposed. The City received a written
comment letter from William and Jeanie Sallee on February 7,2002 (Attachment C).
24.
This site specific rezone application is limited to one "open record" public hearing before
the City Council. The meeting before the Planning Commission is not a public hearing,
and oral public testimony cannot be taken. According to R.C.W. 36.70B, Local Project
Review ("The Regulatory Reform Act"), the Planning Commission shall hold a public
meeting, which may include an informal hearing, and make a recommendation to the
City Council. The recommendation is to be based solely on the information contained
in the official file which includes any written public testimony that was received by
February 7, 2002.
.
Conclusions:
1. The application is for a rezone only which addresses all potential land uses allowed
within that zone and not approval for any specific, subsequent development that may be
an allowed land use according to the Zoning Code.
2. The map's land use designations are intended to show areas where general land use types
are allowed. The area between land use designations should be considered an imprecise
margin in order to provide flexibility in determining the boundary of such areas. When
determining appropriate zoning designations for an area near a margin, the goals,
policies, and objectives of the Land Use Element should take precedence. Therefore, in
this case where the Comp Plan Land Use Map is not clear, analysis of the rezone must
specifically rely on the most relevant Comp Plan goals, policies, and objectives.
3.
Rezone REZ 02-01 for Serenity House is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan
Growth Management, Land Use, and Housing Elements as described in Finding #8.
.
106
Planmng CommIssIon Mznutes - February 13, 2002
Page /4
.
4.
The Comp Plan accepts that districts may be composed primarily of residential uses of
a uniform density and that a healthy, viable district should be composed of residential
uses of varying densities which may be augmented by subordinate and compatible uses.
Since the surrounding existing development includes airport/industrial and multiple
family land uses as well as single family residential uses, 18th Street is a district within
the Northwest Planning Area of the City.
5. The City should ensure that the supply ofland will be sufficient for all housing needs
including the provision of transitional and temporary housing for the homeless and/or
displaced families.
6. The City's action on Rezone REZ 02-01 is consistent with the established procedures for
amending the Zoning Code as specified in PAMC 17.96.100.
7. The need for multi-family housing has been identified and can be seen as a transitional
use between more intensive uses such as airport/industrial and less intensive low density
residential land uses. Based on these needs for additional multi-family zoned land in the
City of Port Angeles, the proposed rezone is found to be beneficial for the community
as a whole and compatible with the desired urban design of the City.
.
8.
Rezone REZ 02-01 is in the public use and interest and would increase the availability
of land for multi-family housing and possibly for special needs transitional housing in
the City.
.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Philpott and failed 2 - 3 with
Commissioners Norton and Philpott voting for the motion and Commissioners Hewins,
Nutter, and Schramm voting in the negative. Commissioner Porter abstained from voting.
Director Collins asked Commissioner Porter to explain his reason for abstaining. Mr.
Porter said that he understands the applicant's intentions but agrees with other Commissioners
that the infrastructure in the Eighteenth Street area is not sufficient to withstand higher density
development. It does not appear that the City has any interest or inclination to spend the money
to make necessary improvements to Eighteenth Street which leaves him with grave concerns
about the safety of individuals who might be living in the area if a rezone is approved. He
understands the need for low income housing, but the City has ample property which is
designated for medium density use and which is not being developed.
Commissioner Schramm said the intended use is needed and necessary. However, he has
the same concerns as everyone else that we can't continue to develop this area without giving
support to the infrastructure, which the City has not done and does not appear to be intending
to do. There is other land available, and to rezone land without appropriate infrastructure and
need to increase the land supply for medium density housing should not be done.
Commissioner Hewins agreed with the previous comments. Serenity House does the
community a great service in all they do. However, there is plenty of other medium density
residential zoned land within the City available for development. The infrastructure in the area
does not support continued high density development.
Commissioner Nutter agreed that Serenity House does a fantastic job of providing
services to the community, but she felt thl~~s more important to protect the public and not
have an accident, especially with children where there aren't sidewalks. Therefore, we must
Plannzng CommiSSIOn Mmutes - February 13. 2002
Page 15
make sure it is a safe area to live in by first requiring adequate infrastructure before allowing
rezones for higher density development.
Mr. Collins asked if he correctly understood that the majority of the Commission
members believe that no further development accessing Eighteenth Street should occur until
infrastructure improvements are made. Commissioner Hewins clarified that only rezones for
higher density development should be restricted until improvements to Eighteenth Street are
made. Mr. Collins asked if we would be protecting children walking along Eighteenth Street or
only children who might live in any new development.
Commissioner Porter emphasized that the City needs to do something with Eighteenth
Street and unless the City is going to make the road safe for traffic, this type of proposal cannot
be approved. Something needs to be done such that the City Council is aware of the problem
and the situation is corrected to allow this type of project to be a possibility.
108
.
.
.
.
.
.
Planmng CommISSIOn Mznutes - February 13. 2002
Director Collins asked to revisit the issue of findings and conclusions in support of the
action on the SERENITY HOUSE REZONE 02-01. He suggested that staff be directed to
return at the February 27,2002, regular meeting with findings and conclusions in support of the
recommendation for denial to the City Council.
Following discussion as to the intentions of the Commission, Commissioner Hewins
stated that, if direction is given asking staff to prepare findings and conclusions in support of the
Commission's recommended denial, the findings make very clear the position that the
Eighteenth Street infrastructure is not developed to what the Commission believes is adequate
to support the current uses and therefore cannot support any increase in density development and
that Eighteenth Street is unsafe for cars and pedestrians.
The Commissioners questioned whether the motion should be amended as the public that
had been in the audience during the earlier action had left. Director Collins reminded the
Commission that the issue is being considered as a public meeting, not a public hearing, and
noted that the action of the Commission could be sent by mail to the parties of record, who had
been in the audience.
Commissioner Hewins asked that findings and conclusions be drafted that emphatically
reflect that the Commission's reasons for a recommendation of denial to the City Council are
based on the belief that the existing infrastructure in the subject area is inadequate and unsafe
to support an increase in density.
Commissioner Norton moved to direct staffto draft findings and conclusions for the
February 27, 2002, regular meeting in support of the Commission's recommendation of
denial of the REZ 02-01 and that those findings and conclusions be mailed to those parties
of record. Commissioner Porter seconded the motion. Commissioner Schramm added that
as each Commissioner had voiced their opinion as to their earlier vote and that acceptance of the
findings and conclusions be a formality rather than a chance for more discussion. further debate.
The motion passed 4 - 2. Commissionets Schramm, Porter, Philpott, and Norton voted for the
I
motion, with Commissioners Hewins and Nutter voting against.
I
i
I
,
,
109
Planmng CommlsslOn Mmutes
February 27, 2002
OLD BUSINESS
.
Findings and conclusions in support of denial of the Serenity House Rezone
Request REZ 02-01 - 2321 West 18th Street. (Continued from February 13, 2002.)
Chair Nutter opened the meeting and referenced staffs February 27,2002 memorandum transmitting
the requested findings and conclusions in support of the Commission's recommendation of denial
of the rezone application. FoJlowing brief discussion, Commissioner Hewins moved to forward
a recommendation of denial of Rezone Application REZ 02-01 for Serenity House to the City
Council citing the foJlowing 25 findings and 8 conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the public record and any written comments received during
the public comment period, and the Planning Commission's deliberation, the City of Port Angeles
Planning Commission makes a recommendation of denial ofREZ02-01 based on the following 25
findings and 8 conclusions:
Findings:
1.
The applicant requests a change in the Zoning map designation of a 4.31 acre rectangular
parcel located on north of 18th Street and the William R. Fairchild International Airport from
Residential, Single Family (RS-9) to Residential, Medium Density (RMD).
.
2. The proposal consists of two lots that are 188,074.28 square feet in size and undeveloped at
this time.
3. The site is located in the Northwest Planning Area of the City, and the Northwest Planning
Area has the largest segment of undeveloped residential land in the City.
4. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the area as a margin between Low
Density Residential (LDR) and Medium Density Residential (MDR).
5. The properties to the east of the subject site are designated, zoned, and developed for
medium density multiple family residential uses, including Serenity House family housing.
6. The properties to the west and north of the subject site are designated, zoned, but sparsely
developed for low density single family residential uses.
7. The properties to the south across 18th Street are designated, zoned, and developed for
industrial uses as the William R. Fairchild International Airport and industrial park.
8.
The Comprehensive Plan has been reviewed with respect to the proposed rezone, and the
most relevant are as follows: Growth Management Element Goal A, Land Use Element Goal
A, Policies Al and A2, Objective AI, Goal B, Goal C, Policies C.l-CA, Transportation
Element Goal A, Goal B, Policies B.9 and B.IO, Objective B.8, Housing Element Goal A,
110
.
.
.
.
Plannmg CommIssion Mmutes - February 27,2002
Page 3
Policies Al and A7, Goal B, Policies B.l, B.2, B.6, B.9, Objectives B.1 and B.2, Capital
Facilities Element Goal A, Policies AI, A2, A-3, A6, A9, and A-13, Goal B, Policies B.l
and B-2.
9.
The subject site is served by 18th Street, which is a designated arterial and is only partially
improved to City arterial street standards with sidewalks serving the multi-family housing
developments east of the subject property to "N" Street.
10.
Clallam Transit provides bus service along 18th Street with bus stops in the near vicinity.
The Port Angeles School District No. 121 provides scheduled school bus service in the near
vicinity to all its schools.
11.
The location adjacent to the airport is a concern due to potential noise conflicts with
residential activities, and new residential development is subject to noise limitations.
12.
Transitional housing for the homeless is a special housing need that is given specific
attention in the Comprehensive Plan but requires a conditional use permit in the Zoning
Code.
13.
A residential neighborhood is not established along 18th St., since the area is still in the
process of being developed with a mix of housing types and densities.
14.
The purpose of the RMD zone is to allow for a mix of single family, duplexes, and
apartments at a density of greater than single family neighborhoods but less than the RHD
zone.
15. If approved to RMD zoning, a total of 53 dwelling units compared to 20 dwelling units under
RS-9 zoning could be permitted on the 188,074.28 square feet of area.
16. Per Port Angeles Municipal Code 17.96.100, "In determining if an amendment to these
regulations is needed, the City Council shall give due consideration to the proper relationship
of such amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and the entire Zoning Regulations; it being
the intent to retain the integrity and validity of the zones herein described and to avoid any
isolated spot zoning changes in the Zoning Map."
17. In the area west of"N" Street there are approximately 209 acres ofRS-9 and 87 acres of
RMD or a 2.3:1 ratio of single family to multiple family zoned land.
18.
In 1995, the lower density residential zoning comprised approximately 46% ofthe total land
base within the City limits, as compared to 4% of the higher density residential zoning.
Based on this analysis the Zoning Map was changed to add 139 acres ofmostIy buildable
Medium Density Residential (RMD) zoning to the available acreage and to subtract the same
139 acres from RS-9 Residential Single Family. This additional RMD zoned land increase
the higher density residential acreage from 4 to 6.3% and similarly decreased the lower
density residential acreage from 46 to 43.6%. Annexations to the City since 1995 have
111
Planmng CommISSIOn Mmutes - February 27, 2002
Page 4
added more RS-9 zoned lands to the total. Considering only the vacant buildable lands
(approximately 400 acres of RS to 100 acres of RMD), the availability of land remains in
favor of lower density residential zones by about a 4 to 1 ratio.
.
19. There have been minimal changes in the City's development trends or patterns in the second
half of the decade of the 1990's. The Clallam County Housing Needs Assessment (1999)
indicated that there were 1,878 multi-family rental units in 1998. According to the
Washington State Office of Financial Management, the City's April 2000, official population
estimates were based on 78% single family and 22% multi-family housing units with a
declining household size. The trend in single family and multi-family housing percentages
in other communities also indicates increasing needs for multi-family zoned land.
20. The Public Works and Fire Departments and the Building Division have made no comments
on the proposed rezone.
21.
The City's State Environmental Policy Act Responsible Official adopted the Environmental
Impact Statement, Addendum, and Supplemental EIS issued for the City of Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1993-1995 and issued a Determination of Non Significance
(#965) for the proposal per WAC 197-11-355 on October 9, 2001. There are no
environmentally sensitive areas located on or adjacent to the subject property. Subsequent
development of the properties would require compliance with various chapters of the Port
Angeles Municipal Code, as it applies.
.
22. Public Notice was given on January 18,2002, identifying a written comment deadline of
February 7, 2002, for consideration in the staff report to the Planning Commission for a
meeting date of February 13,2002, on the proposed. The City received a written comment
letter from William and Jeanie Sallee on February 7, 2002 (Attachment C to the staff report
dated February 13,2002).
23. This site specific rezone application is limited to one "open record" public hearing before the
City Council. The meeting before the Planning Commission is not a public hearing, and oral
public testimony cannot be taken. According to R.C.W. 36.70B, Local Project Review ("The
Regulatory Reform Act"), the Planning Commission shall hold a public meeting, which may
include an informal hearing, and make a recommendation to the City Council. The
recommendation is to be based solely on the information contained in the official file which
includes any written public testimony that was received by February 7, 2002.
24. The Planning Commission determined that the City's 6-Year Capital Facilities Plan has no
planned improvements for 18th Street or westside circulation as called for in the
Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element Policies B.9 and B.1 0 and Objective B.8.
25.
The Planning Commission conducted a public meetting in consideration of Rezone
Application REZ 02-01 on February 13,2002, and continued that discussion to the meeting
of February 27, 2002.
.
112
.
.
.
Planning CommIssIOn Mznutes - February 27,2002
Page 5
Conclusions:
1. The application is for a rezone only which addresses all potential land uses allowed within
that zone and not approval for any specific, subsequent development that may be an allowed
land use according to the Zoning Code.
2. The map's land use designations are intended to show areas where general land use types are
allowed. The area between land use designations should be considered an imprecise margin
in order to provide flexibility in determining the boundary of such areas. When determining
appropriate zoning designations for an area near a margin, the goals, policies, and objectives
of the Land Use Element should take precedence. Therefore, in this case where the Comp
Plan Land Use Map is not clear, analysis of the rezone must specifically rely on the most
relevant Comp Plan goals, policies, and objectives.
3.
Rezone REZ 02-01 for Serenity House is not consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan
Transportation and Capital Facilities Elements described in Finding #8. In particular, the
lack of sidewalks on 18th and 16th Streets from Stevens Middle School and County
fairgrounds to the City landfill does not meet the urban street standards concurrency
requirements for increased density in the 18th Street District. A rezone to Residential
Medium Density will exacerbate the current poor roadway conditions and threaten the safety
of people, particularly children, living in the area. Adequate infrastructure must be planned
and improvements made to make it safe for the people who will be living there before
allowing rezones for higher density.
4. The Comp Plan accepts that districts may be composed primarily of residential uses of a
uniform density and that a healthy, viable district should be composed of residential uses of
varying densities which may be augmented by subordinate and compatible uses. Since the
surrounding existing development includes airport/industrial and multiple family land uses
as well as single family residential uses, 18th Street is a district within the Northwest
Planning Area ofthe City.
5. The infrastructure in the 18th Street area is not sufficient to support development to a higher
density and intensity of use, and there are no planned improvements in the 6-Year Capital
Facilities Plan for improvements to 18th Street.
6. There is other medium density zoned land available, and a rezone without appropriate
infrastructure nor need to increase the land supply for medium density housing is not
justified.
7. The City's action on Rezone REZ 02-01 is consistent with the established procedures for
amending the Zoning Code as specified in PAMC 17.96.100.
8.
Rezone REZ 02-01 is not in the public use and interest, due to the lack of concurrency for
sidewalk improvements that are needed along 18th and 16th Streets, which are too narrow for
safe vehicular and pedestrian traffic increases.
113
Planmng CommiSSIOn Mznutes - February 27, 2002
Page 6
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Schramm.
.
In speaking to the motion, Commissioner Philpott did not favor denial and feared that denial of the
rezone would set a precendent that future development in the City will be dependent on curbs,
gutters, and sidewalks all the way to a school. Such a precedent is not fair or reasonable, and is not
in the best interst of the City
Commissioner Porter stated that without any empirical data confirming that additional medium
density housing is needed in the City a rezone to medium density cannot be justified. He will be
abstaining from the vote because, while there is nothing in the record that would indicate that such
a rezone is not warranted, there is nothing that indicates such a change is justified.
Commissioner Schramm agreed that there is nothing in the record indicating a need for additional
medium density land which is a primary factor in support of a rezone. Due to the lack of
infrastructure in the area, a rezone to higher density is not in the public interest. Information has not
been submitted that supports the need for the requested rezone.
Commissioner Norton does not support denial of the rezone as it shuts the door on a needed
development. The organization that is requesting the rezone is a competent, trustworthy,
organization that will carry through on the development of a facility that is needed in the community.
The motion was called for and carried 3 - 2 with Commissioners Philpott and Norton voting .
in the negative and Commissioner Porter abstaining.
Director Collins indicated that the matter is scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council
on Tuesday, March 5, 2002, approximately 7 p.m.
Commissioner Schramm noted that the Commission's earlier discussion regarding issues of concern
about the increased use at the City's landfill, and the fact that trucks weighing 105,000 pounds will
travel along Eighteenth Street to the landfill with the conversion to a transfer station has not really
been reported in the minutes. Some 30,000 additional vehicle trips have been generated on
Eighteenth Street just from the City's operations without any additional improvements to the
roadway. That is pertinent information that needs to be passed along to the City Council. If the
City's operations are going to impact the infrastructure out there that severely, the City really needs
to give some consideration to the impact to the residents along Eighteenth Street as well as future
development. Thirty thousand (30,000) additional vehicle trips a year from one use is a great deal
of vehicle trips. Mr. Collins noted that the information would be passed along to the Council
through the minutes. He added that at the time the landfill is changed to another use, an
environmental review will need to be done for the change.
Commissioner Philpott asked that the minutes reflect the importance of added infrastructure
development outside ofthe central portion of the City if development is desired.
.
114
.
.
.
115
~ORTANGELES
.
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF
DATE:
February 13, 2002
TO:
Chair Nutter and Planning Commission
Brad Collins, Community Development Director ~
FROM:
FILE #:
REZ 02-01
APPLICANT:
Serenity House of Clallam County
OWNER:
Same
LOCATION:
Center of the block bounded by 18th, 16th, "N," and "0" Streets
.
PROPOSAL:
Change the Zoning Map Designation from Residential, Single Family (RS-9)
to Residential, Medium Density (RMD)
RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Community Development recommends approval of REZ 02-01,
citing the 24 findings and 8 conclusions found in Attachment A to this report.
PROPOSAL
The applicant has requested a change in the Zoning map designation of a 4.31 acre
rectangular parcel located north of 18th Street and the William R. Fairchild International
Airport from Residential, Single Family (RS-9) to Residential, Medium Density (RMD).
The subject property is legally described as Lots 1 and 2 of Short Plat recorded in Short Plats,
Page 57, under Clallam County Recording No. 531689, being a short plat of the west half of
Suburban Lot 102, Townsite of Port Angeles; except that portion conveyed to Chester E. Nelson,
by deed Recorded August 22, 1983, under Clallam County Recording No. 546116. The
application is included as Exhibit 1.
.
116
.
.
.
Community Development Department Staff Report
REZ 02-0 I - Serenity House
February 13,2002
Page 2
STAFF ANALYSIS
The application is for a rezone of property and not for approval of any specific,
subsequent development that may be an allowed land use according to the Zoning Code for that
zone. The rezone addresses potential land uses allowed if the property is rezoned.
The proposal consists of two lots that are 188,074.28 square feet in size and
undeveloped at this time. The site is located in the Northwest Planning Area of the City,
and the Northwest Planning Area has the largest segment of undeveloped residential land
in the City. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the area as a margin
between Low Density Residential (LDR) and Medium Density Residential (MDR). The
map's land use designations are intended to show areas where general land use types are allowed.
The area between land use designations should be considered an imprecise margin in order to
provide flexibility in determining the boundary of such areas. When determining appropriate
zoning designations for an area near a margin, the goals, policies, and objectives of the Land Use
Element should take precedence. Therefore, in this case where the Comp Plan Land Use Map is
not clear, the staff analysis must specifically rely on the most relevant Comp Plan goals, policies,
and objectives.
The properties to the east of the subject site are designated, zoned, and developed
for medium density multiple family residential uses, including Serenity House family
housing. The properties to the west and north of the subject site are designated, zoned, but
sparsely developed for low density single family residential uses. The properties to the
south across 18th Street are designated, zoned, and developed for industrial uses as the
William R. Fairchild International Airport and industrial park. Neither 18th, "N," nor "0"
Streets are fully developed, although the north side of 18th Street east of the subject site is
improved with curb, gutter, and sidewalks. The right-of-way for 16th Street is not improved
abutting the subject property.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ZONING & DEVELOPMENT REGULATION REVIEW
Comprehensive Plan
The Comprehensive Plan has been reviewed with respect to the proposed rezone, and the
most relevant are as follows: Growth Management Element Goal A, Land Use Element Goal A,
Policies A.l and A.2, Objective A.l, Goal B, Goal C, Policies C.t-CA, Transportation Element
Goal A, Goal B, Policies B.9-B.1 0, Objective B.8, Housing Element Goal A, Policies A.1 and
A.7, Goal B, Policies B.1, B.2, B.6, B.9, Objectives B.l and B.2, Capital Facilities Element Goal
A, Policies A.I-A.3, A.6, A.9, A.B, Goal B, Policies B.1-B.2.
Growth Management Element
GoalA - "To manage growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial to the community as a
whole, is sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals, and is consistent with the State of
Washington's Growth Management Act. "
117
CommUnIty Development Department Staff Report
REZ 02-01 - Serenity House
February 13,2002
Page 3
Land Use Element
.
General Comments - Residential -
Low Density Residential. Low Density Residential "allows an overall residential
density of a project or property to range up to 9 units per net acre. The high majority of
residentially designated property in the City will be of this designation. It is intended for the
development of single family homes. It also allows for the development of duplexes and planned
residential developments in accordance with the underlying zoning. "
Medium Density Residential. "The primary intent of this designation isfor development
of multiple residential unit projects including, but not limited to, duplexes, townhomes,
condominiums, apartments, and planned residential developments at a density of up to 15 units
per net acre. " _
Goal A - "To guide current andfuture development within the City in a manner that provides
certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the challenges
and opportunities of the future. "
Goal A, Policy No.1 - "The Comprehensive Plan Land use map should be used as a conceptual
guide for determining current and long range zoning and other land use decisions. The map's
land use designations are intended to show areas where general land use types are allowed.
The area between land use designations should be considered an imprecise margin in order to
provide flexibility in determining the boundary of such areas. When determining appropriate
zoning designations for an area near a margin, the goals, policies and objectives of the Land .
Use Element should take precedence. "
Goal A, Policy No.2 - ''All land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council and/or
any of its appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and its land use map. "
Goal A, Objective No.1 - "The City will review and revise as necessary the existing Zoning
Ordinance, Zoning Map, and other development regulations to ensure consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan. "
Goal B - "To have a community where residential development and use of the land are done
in a manner that is compatible with the environment, the characteristics of the use and the
users, and the desired urban design of the City. "
Goal C - "To have a community of viable districts and neighborhoods with a variety of
residential opportunitiesfor personal interaction,fulfillment and enjoyment, attractive to
people of all ages, characteristics and interests."
Goal C, Policy No.1 - "Residential land should be developed on the district and neighborhood
concept. Although such districts may be composed primarily of residential uses of a uniform
density, a healthy, viable district should be composed of residential uses of varying densities .
which may be augmented by subordinate and compatible uses. Single family and multi-family
homes, parks and open-spaces, schools, churches, day care and residential services, home
occupations, and district shopping areas are all legitimate components of district development
, 118
.
.
.
Community Development Department Staff Report
REZ 02-01 - Serenity House
February 13, 2002
Page 4
and enhancement. A neighborhood should be primarily composed of low, medium, or high
density housing. "
Goal C, Policy No.2 - "Medium and high density housing should be located in areas of the
community most suitable for such uses, based on existing services, public facilities, and
transportation. "
Goal C, Policy No.3 - "Medium and high density housing should be served by arterial streets
of sufficient size in order to satisfy traffic demand and to lessen neighborhood traffic
congestion. "
Goal C, Policy No.4 - "Medium and high density housing could be a transitional use between
different land uses, provided such other uses would not adversely impact the residential nature
of the housing. "
Transportation Element
Goal A - uTo develop a coordinated, multi-modal transportation system which serves all areas
of the city and all types of users in a safe, economical, and efficient manner."
Goal B - UTo improve circulation patterns across and within the community. "
Goal B, Policy No. B.9 - "Traffic circulation to andfrom the airport and around associated
industrial areas should be improved."
Goal B, Policy No. B.10 - "The City should complete the arterial systemfor westside
development. "
Goal B, Objective No. B.B - "The City will implement street improvements planned to provide
access to and improve circulation around the south side of the airport along Lauridsen
Boulevard and Airport Road and the west side of the airport along Milwaukee Drive to Lower
Elwha Road. "
Housing Element
Goal A - "To improve the variety, quality, availability, and affordability of housing
opportunities in the City of Port Angeles. "
Goal A, Policy No.1 - "The City should expand the residential land use options in the Zoning
Code by classifying residential zones by allowed density rather than by housing types. "
Goal A, Policy No.7 - "The City should promote acceptance of low and moderate income
housing through public information programs. "
Goal B - "To participate with Clallam County and other entities in programs to increase the
availability and affordability of public assisted housing and rental units as well as other
affordable housing opportunities. "
119
Commumty Development Department Staff Report
REZ 02-01 - Seremty House
February 13,2002
Page 5
Goal B, Policy No.1 - "The City should participate in a county-wide housing task force .
comprised of representatives from government, financial institutions, business, construction, real
estate, non-profit housing entities, and other citizens interested in housing issues. A major goal
of the taskforce should be coordinating efforts to provide affordable housing, encouraging rapid
review of low and moderate income housing projects throughout the County, and promoting
public education and awareness regarding the needfor and nature of affordable housing. "
Goal B, Policy No.2 - "The City should cooperate with the county-wide housing taskforce
and other agencies in assembling packages ofpublicly owned land which could be usedfor
low and moderate income housing andfor shelter or transitional housing."
Goal B, Policy No.6 - "Adequate low and moderate income housing opportunities should be
provided within the Port Angeles Planning Area. "
Goal B, Policy No.9 - "The City should help support the provision of transitional and
temporary housing for the homeless and/or displaced families. "
Goal B, Objective No.1 - "The City will work with the housing taskforce to determine that the
supply of land will be sufficient for all housing needs including but not limited to government
assisted housing, housingfor low incomefamilies, manufactured housing, multi-family
housing, group homes,foster-carefacilities, and single-room occupancies (SRO)."
Goal B, Objective No.2 - "The City will reference the Clallam County Housing Needs Study and .
subsequent analysis that update the information in evaluating the type, amount, and location of
needed housing. "
Capital Facilities Element
Goal A - "To provide and maintain safe andfinancially feasible urban services and capital
facilities at or .above stated levels of service to all City residents and the general public. "
Goal A, Policy No. A.l - "The Comprehensive Plan shall establish general level of service
standards for each urban utility and service. Such standards shall be used to determine the
impacts of development. "
Goal A, Policy No. A.2 - "The City should, at a minimum, ensure the continuation of established
level of service standards for all urban utilities and services to the extent and in the manner
provided herein. "
Goal A, Policy No. A-3 - "The City shall develop individual comprehensive service andfacility
plans for the following utilities and/or services:
· streets, bikeways and pedestrian walkways,... "
Goal A, Policy No. A.6 - "The comprehensive service andfacility plan for streets, bikeways, and
pedestrian walkways shall also include specific actions and requirements for bringing into
compliance any street facilities that fall below the required level of service, including demand
.
120
.
.
.
Commumty Development Department Staff Report
REZ 02-01 - Seremty House
February 13,2002
Page 6
management strategies which encourage reduced reliance on single occupant vehicle trips and
encourage use of alternate modes of transportation such as the bicycles, walkways, and transit
riding with incentive programs for andfrom local businesses."
Goal A, Policy No. A.9 - "The City shall require concurrency at the time of developmentfor
the following utilities and services:
· streets,... "
Goal A, Policy No. A-13 - "lfprojectedfundingfailsfor a capital project listed asfunded in
the City's approved Capital Facilities Plan and development permits have been issued reliant
upon that capital projectfor concurrency, the City shall take necessary actions to minimize
further degradation of the impacted service or facility. This may include one or any
combination of the following actions:
a) reduce the level of service standard,
b) increase funding by increasing revenues,
c) reduce demand by revising the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and/or Zoning
Map, and/or
d) reduce demand by reducing consumption (i.e., conservation). "
Goal B - "To provide urban streets and utilities at minimum levels for all city residents and the
general public. "
Goal B, Policy No. B.l - "All arterial streets shall function at an average daily level of service
D or better. "
Goal B, Policy No. B-2 - "Development on all arterial streets and any other streets identified as
school walking routes shall include pedestrian sidewalks. "
The subject site is served by 18th Street, which is a designated arterial that is only
partially improved with sidewalks serving the multi-family housing developments east of
the subject property. Clallam Transit provides bus service along 18th Street with bus stops in
the near vicinity. Port Angeles School District No. 121 also provides school bus service to the
area, and 18th Street is not designated as a school walking route at this location. The level of
service standard for traffic along W. 18th Street is at or above LOS D and therefore meets the
City's concurrency standards. Although W. 18th Street may pose problems for children walking
along it, it cannot be argued that W. 18th Street does not meet established City urban service
standards.
The land use question presented by the rezone proposal applies to all new development
along W. 18th Street including that for airport industrial uses and other new residential uses.
Traffic meets the City standards to allow for new development, including the rezone. If
pedestrian safety is a concern for a particular development, that should be addressed at the time
of the development proposal.
Transitional housing for the homeless is a special housing need that is given specific
attention in the Comprehensive Plan but requires a conditional use permit in the Zoning
Code. The 18th Street district has all the conditions available for this special housing need
in place such as public transit, an arterial street, vacant affordable land, and a non-profit
121
Commumty Development Department Staff Report
REZ 02-01 - Seremty House
February 13,2002
Page 7
service provider. A residential neighborhood is not established along 18th Street, since the .
area is still in the process of being developed with a mix of housing types and densities.
Zoning Code
The purpose of the Zoning Code is to implement the goals, policies and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan by dividing the City into zones restricting and regulating the location,
construction, alteration of the use of structures and land, and to promote the orderly and
appropriate development of such areas.
RMD (PAMC 17.14)
The purpose of the RMD zone is to allow for a mix of single family, duplexes, and
apartments at a density of greater than single family neighborhoods but less than the RHD zone.
The permitted uses are intended to be more restrictive than the RHD zone, and commercial uses
are not considered to be compatible. The density for RMD would allow for one dwelling unit per
3,500 s.f. oflot area with a minimum lot area of7,000 s.f.
RS-9 (PAMC 17.11)
This is a low density residential zone intended to create and preserve urban single family
residential neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family homes on larger than
standard townsite-sized lots. Uses which are compatible with and functionally related to a single
family residential environment may also be located in this zone. Density allowed is one dwelling
per 7,000 s.f. with a minimum lot area of7,000 s.f.
If approved to RMD zoning, a total of 53 dwelling units compared to 20 dwelling
units under RS-9 zoning could be permitted on the 188,074.28 square feet of area.
Since the Comp Plan accepts that districts may be composed primarily of residential uses
ofa uniform density and that a healthy, viable district should be composed of residential uses of
varying densities which may be augmented by subordinate and compatible uses, the question is
does 18th Street represent such district or a neighborhood, which is defined by the primary type
and/or density of the residential units located in that particular area of the district. Clearly, the
surrounding existing development includes airport/industrial and multiple family land uses
as well as single family residential uses, and, therefore, 18th Street is a district within the
Northwest Planning Area of the City.
17.96.100 Amendments.
A. HIn determining if an amendment to these regulations is needed, the City
Council shall give due consideration to the proper relationship of such amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan and the entire Zoning Regulations; it being the intent to retain the
integrity and validity of the zones herein described and to avoid any isolated spot zoning
changes in the Zoning Map.
B Any amendments adopted by the Council may be modifiedfrom the form in which
they were advertised within the limits necessary to relate properly such amendment or
amendments to the Zoning Regulations. Final action on such modifications shall be subject to
review and report of the Planning Commission prior to final passage by the City Council.
C. No application for a change of zoning of any lot, parcel or portion thereof shall
be considered by the Council within one year of the final action of the Council upon a prior
122
.
.
.
.
.
Community Development Department Staff Report
REZ 02-01 - Serenity House
February 13,2002
Page 8
application covering any of the same described land. This provision, however, shall not impair
the right of the Council to propose by their own action any amendment or change in the
boundaries of any of the zones in these regulations. "
As required by the Zoning Code and case law, certain criteria are required to be met for
the approval of rezones, which includes consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, consistency
with the Zoning Code, including maintaining the validity, integrity and purpose and intent of the
zones as well as avoiding spot zones, and demonstration that there has been a change in the land
use needs since the area was previously zoned. The consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
goals and policies and with purposes of the Zoning Code and the zones in question were
reviewed above, and the proposed rezone can be found to be consistent. The proposal, which
consists of two properties, does not meet the test of a "spot zone," since it is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and contiguous with existing RMD zoning.
The following analysis addresses the ongoing need for land zoned for multiple family
residential development. Several previous studies and inventories of lands and land uses have
shown that there is a relative shortage of multiple family zoned land compared to single family
zoned land within the City limits. The most recent land use analysis in Port Angeles was
summarized in the Community Profile Section ofthe Comprehensive Plan. This section stated
that there were 12 acres of buildable areas zoned multiple family residential, while there were
491 acres of buildable areas zoned low density residential. In 1995, the lower density
residential zoning comprised approximately 46% of the total land base within the City
limits, as compared to 4 % of the higher density residential zoning. Based on this analysis
the Zoning Map was changed to add 139 acres of mostly buildable Medium Density
Residential (RMD) zoning to the available acreage and to subtract the same 139 acres from
RS-9 Residential Single Family. This additional RMD zoned land increased the higher
density residential acreage from 4 to 6.3% and similarly decreased the lower density
residential acreage from 46 to 43.6%. Annexations to the City since 1995 have added more
RS-9 zoned lands to the total. Considering only the vacant buildable lands (approximately
400 acres of RS to 100 acres of RMD), the availability of land remains in favor of lower
density residential zones by about a 4 to 1 ratio.
There have been minimal changes in the City's development trends or patterns in the
second half of the decade of the 1990's. The Clallam County Housing Needs Assessment (1999)
indicated that there were 1,878 multi-family rental units in 1998. According to the Washington
State Office of Financial Management, the City's April 2000, official population estimates
were based on 78% single family and 22% multi-family housing units with a declining
household size. The trend in single family and multi-family housing percentages in other
communities also indicates increasing needs for multi-family zoned land.
The need for multi-family housing has been identified and can be seen as a
transitional use between more intensive uses such as airport/industrial and less intensive
low density residential land uses. Based on these needs for additional multi-family zoned land
in the City of Port Angeles, the proposed rezone is found to be beneficial for the community as a
whole, compatible with the desired urban design of the City, and in the public interest.
123
Community Development Department Staff Report
REZ 02-01 - Serenity House
February 13, 2002
Page 9
DEP ARTMENT AL COMMENTS
The Public Works and Fire Departments and the Building Division have made no
comments on the proposed rezone.
.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City's State Environmental Policy Act Responsible Official adopted the
Environmental Impact Statement, Addendum, and Supplemental EIS issued for the City of Port
Angeles Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1993-1995 and issued a Determination of
NonSignificance (#965) for the proposal per WAC 197-11 on October 9, 2001.
There are no environmentally sensitive areas located on or adjacent to the subject
property. Subsequent development of the properties would require compliance with various
chapters of the Port Angeles Municipal Code, as it applies. The SEPA Determination of
NonSignificance did not find any significant impact due to traffic in the rezone action. At the
time of any subsequent development, the traffic impacts ofthat development may be assessed
differently. The SEP A review for the proposed Adult Transitional Housing/Emergency Shelter
likewise did not identify any significant impact due to traffic. To the contrary, the Serenity
House proposal would have a reduced traffic impact on W. 18th Street compared to other multi-
family and single family residential developments that could be placed on the 4.31 acres.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public Notice was given on January 18,2002, identifying a written comment
deadline of February 7, 2002, for consideration in the staff report to the Planning
Commission for a meeting date of February 13, 2002, on the proposed. The City received a .
written comment letter from William and Jeanie Sallee on February 7, 2002 (Attachment
C). The Salees' comments correctly identify that the rezone issue is separate from the applicant
Serenity House and the proposed conditional use permit. The focus of the comments on the land
use analysis is also correct, and there is little dispute of the facts concerning LDR/RS-9 area
designations and MDR/RMD area designations west of "N" Street. The main facts being 209
acres ofRS-9 and 87 acres ofRMD or a 2.3 to 1 ratio of single family to multiple family zoned
land area west of "N" Street.
This 2.3 to 1 ratio compared to the 4 to 1 ratio for the whole City is an application of a
small area analysis to a factor derived for understanding land use for the whole area of the City.
If we were to apply the same small area analysis to any neighborhood or district throughout the
City, no area would have a 4: 1 ratio, and most small areas would have a much greater divergence
from 4:1 than 2.3:1. For example, the Lower Cherry Hill neighborhood would be 0:1; the Lower
and Upper Cherry Hill district would be closer to 1: 1; the residential neighborhood above the
High School would be 1 :0; and so on. Applying the City-wide 4: 1 ratio in this context shows
that the proposed rezone is consistent with the conclusion that there is a greater need for multiple
family zoned land for the City as a whole.
The evolution of the City's land development manifests a City-wide pattern that has a
central core of RS-7/RHD established neighborhoods, where existing development resists major
changes in the single family/multiple family ratio but where the ratio is the highest for multiple
family. The west and east sides of the City and Urban Growth Areas demonstrate a land use
pattern of RS-9/RMD developing neighborhoods, where there is much more vacant, buildable .
land. Since RMD zoning is relatively new in comparison to the other residential zones, it has
been designated mostly to these developing west and east side parts of town and reflects the
locations of existing mobile home park develqI!l4nts as well as a new policy to provide for
.
.
.
Commumty Development Department Staff Report
REZ 02-01 - Seremty House
February 13,2002
Page 10
lower density, multiple family zoning. RMD density is 1 dwelling unit per 3500 square feet of
land area compared to 1 dwelling unit per 1000 square feet of land area for RHD and 1 dwelling
unit per 7000 to 9000 square feet for RS-7 or RS-9. The conclusion to be drawn from the City's
land development pattern and housing density is that the proposed rezone is a normal evolution
of the city's growth management policies and not a significant alteration of the pattern or density
in the 18th Street district. To the contrary, the proposed rezone is a logical extension of the
existing RMD development taking place on 18th Street adjacent to the Airport Industrial Park in a
district where a much greater number of multiple family housing units have been built in recent
years than single family residences.
This site specific rezone application is limited to one "open record" public hearing before
the City Council. The meeting before the Planning Commission is not a public hearing, and oral
public testimony cannot be taken. According to R.C.W. 36.70B, Local Project Review ("The
Regulatory Reform Act"), the Planning Commission shall hold a public meeting, which may
include an informal hearing, and make a recommendation to the City Council. The
recommendation is to be based solely on the information contained in the official file which
includes written public testimony received by February 7, 2002.
Attachment A - Findings and Conclusions
Attachment B - Application
Attachment C - Public comment letter from William and Jeanie Sallee
125
~ORTANGELES
.
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
DEP ARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF
DATE:
February 27,2002
TO:
Chair Nutter and Planning Commission
Brad Collins, Community Development Direclor~
FROM:
FILE #:
REZ 02-01
APPLI CANT:
Serenity House of Clallam County
OWNER:
Same
.
LOCATION:
Center of the block bounded by 18th, 16th, "N," and "0" Streets
PROPOSAL:
Change the Zoning Map Designation from Residential, Single Family (RS-9)
to Residential, Medium Density (RMD)
RECOMMENDATION
As requested, the Department of Community Development recommends the
following 24 findings and 8 conclusions in support of denial of REZ 02-01. The Department
of Community Development staff report and recommendation in support of approval will be
provided to the City Council with regard to this matter.
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
The Planning Commission's February 13,2002, minutes include much discussion by
Commissioners about inadequate infrastructure in the 18th Street District and adequate
availability of Residential Medium Density zoned land in the vicinity of the proposed
rezone. The Comprehensive Plan goals, policies, and objectives found to be most relevant
to these concerns are as follows:
.
126
.
.
.
Community Development Department Staff Report
REZ 02-01 - Serenity House
February 27, 2002
Page 2
Transportation Element
Goal A - "To develop a coordinated, multi-modal transportation system which serves all areas
of the city and all types of users in a safe, economical, and efficient manner. "
Goal B - "To improve circulation patterns across and within the community. "
Goal B, Policy No. B.9 - HTraffic circulation to andfrom the airport and around associated
industrial areas should be improved. "
Goal B, Policy No. B.10 - HThe City should complete the arterial systemfor westside
development. "
Goal B, Objective No. B.B - HThe City will implement street improvements planned to provide
access to and improve circulation around the south side of the airport along Lauridsen
Boulevard and A irport Road and the west side of the airport along Milwaukee Drive to Lower
Elwha Road. "
Capital Facilities Element
Goal A - HTo provide and maintain safe an dfin an cially feasible urban services and capital
facilities at or above stated levels of service to all City residents and the general public. "
Goal A, Policy No. A.I - "The Comprehensive Plan shall establish general level of service
standards for each urban utility and service. Such standards shall be used to determine the
impacts of development. "
Goal A, Policy No. A.2 - "The City should, at a minimum, ensure the continuation of established
level of service standards for all urban utilities and services to the extent and in the manner
provided herein. "
Goal A, Policy No. A-3 - "The City shall develop individual comprehensive service andfacility
plans for the following utilities and/or services:
· streets, bikeways and pedestrian walkways,... "
Goal A, Policy No. A.6 - "The comprehensive service andfacility plan for streets, bikeways, and
pedestrian walkways shall also include specific actions and requirements for bringing into
compliance any street facilities that fall below the required level of service, including demand
management strategies which encourage reduced reliance on single occupant vehicle trips and
encourage use of alternate modes of transportation such as the bicycles, walkways, and transit
riding with incentive programs for andfrom local businesses."
Goal A, Policy No. A.9 - HThe City shall require concurrency at the time of developmentfor
the following utilities and services:
· streets,... "
Goal A, Policy No. A-13 - H/fprojectedfun;ilJffailsfor a capital project listed asfunded in
Commumty Development Department Staff Report
REZ 02-01 - Seremty House
February 27, 2002
Page 3
the City's approved Capital Facilities Plan and development permits have been issued reliant
upon that capital projectfor concurrency, the City shall take necessary actions to minimize .
further degradation of the impacted service or facility. This may include one or any
combination of the following actions:
a) reduce the level of service standard,
b) increase funding by increasing revenues,
c) reduce demand by revising the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and/or Zoning
Map, and/or
d) reduce demand by reducing consumption (i.e., conservation). "
Goal B - "To provide urban streets and utilities at minimum levels for all city residents and the
general public. "
Goal B, Policy No. B.] - "All arterial streets shall function at an average daily level of service D
or better. "
Goal B, Policy No. B-2 - "Development on all arterial streets and any other streets identified as
school walking routes shall include pedestrian sidewalks. "
Rezones are reviewed against the requirements of the Zoning Code, which is listed below,
and three tests from case law, namely, consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, a change in
circumstances since the existing zoning was established, and in the public interest. The
availability of adequate land supply and public safety are the concerns expressed by the .
Commissioners in support of denial of the proposed rezone.
17.96.100 Amendments.
A. "In determining if an amendment to these regulations is needed, the City
Council shall give due consideration to the proper relationship of such amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan and the entire Zoning Regulations; it being the intent to retain the
integrity and validity of the zones herein described and to avoid any isolated spot zoning
changes in the Zoning Map.
B. Any amendments adopted by the Council may be modifiedfrom the form in which
they were advertised within the limits necessary to relate properly such amendment or
amendments to the Zoning Regulations. Final action on such modifications shall be subject to
review and report of the Planning Commission prior to final passage by the City Council.
C. No application for a change of zoning of any lot, parcel or portion thereof shall
be considered by the Council within one year of the final action of the Council upon a prior
application covering any of the same described land. This provision, however, shall not impair
the right of the Council to propose by their own action any amendment or change in the
boundaries of any of the zones in these regulations. "
DEP ARTMENT AL COMMENTS
It should be noted that the Public Works & Utilities and Fire Departments made no
comments on the proposed rezone. The adequacy of 18th Street was not identified as an issue by
City staff.
.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
It should be noted that the City's SEP t~sponsible Official adopted the Environmental
.
.
.
Community Development Department Staff Report
REZ 02-01 - Serenity House
February 27,2002
Page 4
Impact Statement, Addendum, and Supplemental EIS issued for the City of Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1993-1995 and issued a Determination ofNonSignificance
(#965) for the proposal per WAC 197-11 on October 9,2001, which like the Departmental
reviews did not identify 18th Street as insufficient for capacity or safety reasons
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public Notice was given on January 18, 2002, identifying a written comment deadline of
February 7,2002, for consideration in the staff report to the Planning Commission for a meeting
date of February 13,2002, on the proposed. The City received a written comment letter from
William and Jeanie Sallee on February 7,2002 (Attachment C to the staff report dated February
13,2002). The Salees' comments focus on the availability of multiple family zoned land west of
"N" Street and testify to the concern that there is an adequate supply of land already and more is
not needed. It should be noted that the Community Development Director pointed out the land
supply analysis applies to the City as a whole and not to any small area by itself.
Attaclunent A - Findings and Conclusions for Denial
129
/11 / /le/7/-It:::. /V I l:
Fee: $450 & Sepa ($150)
c~ I r OF PORT ANGELES
Rezone Application
.
PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING THIS FORM
1. (A) APPLICANT: Serenity House of Clallam County Daytime Phone: (360) 452-7224
Address: P.O. Box 4047, Port Angeles, Washington 98363
(B) PROPERTY OWNER (if other than applicant): the applicant is the owner
Property Owner's Address (if other than applicant): N/A Daytime Phone: N/A
(C) APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE if other than applicant or property owner: Dan Jacobs,
Executive Director Phone: (360) 452-7224
2. (A) Legal Description of Subject Property: Short Plat No. 81-10-6: The State of Washington
describes it as follows: II Lots 1 and 2 of Short Plat recorded in short Plats, Page 57, under Clallam
County Recording No. 53168'9, being a short plat of the west half of the suburban lot 102, Townsite
of Port Angeles; except that portion conveyed to Chester E. Nelson, by deed Recorded August 22,
1983, under Clallam County recording No. 546116. .
(B) General Location of Subject Project: The site is located in the north central portion of
Clallam County, Washington immediately north of the William R. Fairchild International Airport. The
site is rectangul~u in shape, comprising 4.31 acres of land. Its location is between 18th and 16th
streets on the south and north and between "N" and "0" streets to the east and west.
3. Size of Subject Property 188,074.28 sq. ft. Approximately 4.31 acres.
4. Zoning of Subject Property RS-9 Proposed'ZoningDesignation RMD
" ,
5. Characteristics of Subject Property (how is it developed): The Site is approximately 4.31 acres
of slightly sloping land at elevations from approximately 250 to 275 feet above mean sea level. All
Buildings which occupied the site prior to 1999 were removed under City Ordinance provisions for
the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings (City of Port Angeles 1999).
6. Characteristics of Surrounding Area (what uses are around the property): Surrounding land uses
include multi-family residential units to the east, a forested lot to the south, pasture, lightly forested
land and one residence to the west, and a municipal airport and industrial park to the south.
7. Comprehensive Plan Designation of Property:
Light industrial or medium density designations are both acceptable for this site.
.
130
It
.
8. Comprehensive Plan Designation of Surrounding Properties:
. Single family homes are to the west. Residential Medium Density zoning is to the east, a forested
lot to the north and fields to the northwest. To the south is the William R. Fairchild International
Airport. To the southwest and southeast are light industrial parks.
9. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies:
Section IV Growth Management Element: Goal A. Policy 1 d. Housing and I. Section V Land-Use
Element: Goal A. Policy 3., Goal B. Policies 2,3, and 4. as well as Section VIII Housing Element:
Goal B Policies 3,5, and 9.
10. JUSTIFICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
(A) Relationship to Comprehensive Plan:
Housing and Residential Element
(8) Suitability of Property for Proposed Zoning:
This property is located in an area of varied use. It is across from an industrial area and is located
next to a Residential Medium Density zoned property. The proposed zoning change will blend with
these uses and maintain the existing land use already established in this vicinity by the current
Serenity House Single Adult Shelter.
.
(C) Change in Circumstances Since Original Zoning:
A single family home and barn used to occupy this site, however, all buildings occupying this site
have been removed under city ordinance provisions for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings.
The site in now a vacant 4.3 acre lot. Surrounding properties have already changed zoning to suit
the city's population.
(D) Inappropriateness of Current Zoning:
Within the current zoning, a shelter for homeless persons in not considered a permitable conditional
use. The City of Port Angeles requires a Conditional Use Permit for this'type of social services
facility.
11. I CERTIFY that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and
acknowledge that willful misrepresentation of information will immediately terminate this
application.
File No. ;qEZ oj -0/
Received /;;2-/:2 C/O 1
Hearing(s)
.
131
C/1Y OF PORT ANGELES Planning Department, 321 East Fifth Street, P.O. Box 1150, Port Angeles, W.4 98362 (360) 417-4750
Portion of the City of Port Angeles Z~~ing_Map
I r______LOT_t2_________ ~
.. : -- ~-------------'--l
OPEN APJ:A I .
: ~ (RJTmE DEVEI.OPI1:NTJ i
I ~~ I
I I
I Ib
I ~ I~
I ~:.
: I
Ii ~.. ~He
I
I
I
I
I I
. I
I I
I
I
L_
tQh1'
.
( i
.> ~
;. ~
.
, ~ I d
~
~
23.13'
tit
.
REGV'6
o 0
I
a
I
~y
U&~&I
-
(lI) P AA.KJ H6
I
\
L
r1
--
r\ II
V
_-L~_
151.23 .
I~ SIt<tt1
Kenneth Hays Architect, inc
~t~"~~~
104'
I
I
EXlST.1REE {} 0
'01
1RA!W ,~
RfGYGLe m
LOTII
1<)4'
n ^ nTI ^ I C' .Tr:: nl ^....I
-
~ ~
~ FENCe:> YNlD
EXIST. TREES
-~-@-'= ---
/T"\
Port Angeles area, Washington, United States
( .' J. > '\.. .....- .._.,.. I I ............ " '..
r <.. ,.~....."., ' ..-....-:'---- I~~'
. .... "" .~-~ ....~ "".... -~......
// ....:::::.) tic -~~"""::;::;;...-.-- eJI ...... ,
/' ! c- - -.-__--'.0;;:: . ,
, -- ,.- ~:'& . r-...."
p -. l::;-, ~' ~/, /"
/(J;~ "",', ~
w. ~~" "">'. " Go: II
I? 'n. . ......... /.
~ ~ ~,~ /~
I. ./7..::,.., ""''':;''''*' /;/ ....
" ". ,1.'<1 F .~. '<Jjl (, I u I
' <>" . . // ..~. /1"'0...d, I
.. . ,. I
" ... ...,. '.. I ...... . , ~ " I
"'..<:: ". ".- ''ie:::Qf' . /.~:. "'<::::',~ '. //....:s-pih~...... .~~~~,... //~:<., ~h-~/:~~~ I
"'. ..... '. ',.:". (J <;ff's....... .... ...,..... / ", " '/1; / 'l:>'"l<.~
"':', " ,../ j.";:' n"C;,,,, .....'11?!/ //',...... :f.....~;:,... 4'J
:. ~~~~~~;::::..., t?~~I~NT'~ 4t' tP,-;'kh v /). l/4>k-- (,1 ')) ',,~~~..:"~'~ ~J;
" :.:.:........~, I" r/~t:.-. (jl il'l~""~: /1 ''i-.,:).. ,. ~~/
. ....~,,;:.,.V.1;,' 11 .. ..... r"I 0 I' 1;):1
'"DJ""'I'L'i">""~~;;"":"""', // ~ /, \" ( ~ I '. ~~ I
'. ;-.....:~. / ' 1''''' I , .,.......... / h...'." -....."0 . "
ro.. /11 / / ........'. ''''', _ ~""'"
~':h.. /. /\~, /~ r?t'5".')~:::::u-r.IAL- "0S1~:;' l/...~ ' .,- . ;~', I '
" f l'j( '1...." ".. IV,~ t ' (./ IJ . , .
':.... . '.~' ,I ......... ." .
...~:~.. 1jJ ~ / / ......\.....; , f.... ,
'/,........, ~ 'l ... , '" ,
)/.....,'iI!. -:t,t l?~ -~E3J~r 'j ",
';,<~/2. ~~. r ,!SITE ~ iI'':........."
". ,,k"':"'-. . ."...... //......... ....y
':-",l- ~"''''!:.''''''''-'' --- ......., ;)
;,:.;]:>.>..::", I ~"N ~
-"'. f.J-,""" ..... I
. . ...."..... ,
" ~0''''
~~~.0.. 0 1~~;:il'l!:.."::::::::.....II~
~?;,,~_v/ "'-, h
h"{1:~r.'i\..~"". ,~,\,.,' '::' ,
-
--
e
~
,I::l.
1."( I~,.= L~ao l +:/-. .~ 'C
......A.,.......
I . '__
o mi 0.2 04 0.6
COPYr,ght@19880200.S0ftcorpand/orit"UPPllersAII roghls reserved, hllp./Iwww micros oft com/Slreela . .
CI.l COPYrlghl1999 by hie Dale Technology, Inc:. All rights reserved. C 1999 NaVigation TeCl'1nologies All nghls reserved TrIlS es Information laken wllh permiSSIon frpm Canadian aulho"lles C He; Majesty the Queen 1M Right of Ca Page 1
@ Cooyrlght 1999 by earch Mlcromarkellng Oala and Systams Ltd
/J " //
-::-,-'r~r ,L/" , .:..../ ,II.-/ L- /V /-_. L/7
/ /, ,'I L_/II <'--
.
William and
2421
Po
o [E(G;[E~~lE~~
ie Sallee
.18th~t l
nlltl. WA - 7 2002 J
CITY Of PORT ANGELES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
February 6, 2002
Planning Commission
City of Port Angeles
RE: Rezoning: Serenity House of Clallam County proposal at 2321 W. 18th Street
Commissioners:
.
In October of last year you conducted hearings dealing with two items submitted
by Serenity House regarding property at 2321 W. 18th Street. One of these items
was a reqtie$t for a Conditional Use Permit for their proposed care facility and
the other was a request for rezoning the subject property from RS9 to RMD.
Staff presented their report to you based on the presumption that the rezone
approval was a fait accompli. (If this isn't an example of the cart-before-the-
horse I don't know what is). You recommended approval of the proposal based
on findings presented in the Planning Department's staff report. The City Council
conducted a public hearing on the rezone request in NoverTlbe~ at which, with
one member abstaining, they deadlocked in motions to both approve. and deny
the applic<;ltion. They tabled the action to a subsequent meeting in which they
again C1eadlocked. The tie resulted in a denial of the proposal and the applicant
withdrew the application prior to the certification of findings and conclusions to be
read qnd addressed at the next scheduled council meeting. '
The council,has recen,tly seated several new members, and Serenity House has
resubmitted the application for rezoning of the property. While the council has
changed membership, the facts regarding the underlying la'nd use issue have not
changed.
"
The st~ff report submitted to, the Planning Commission in October specified some
18 findings in support of their recommendation of approval. It is our
understanding that staff is presenting the same report, in essence, to you again
and continuing to recommend approval. The substance ,of the findings presented
are valid with regard to Comp Plan issues dealing with land use, housing and
zoning. The major issue over looked is that these issues are already addressed
in both current zoning and in existing parcel inventory. The findings argue in
support of a need already met. This point was addressed in our letter to th,e
Commission, dated October 3,2001, and during my testimony before the council.
A staff memo to the City Council, dated November 11, 2001 comments on the
fact that there is in fact available land currently zoned RMD, but that the ratio of
land within this zone as compared with existing single family zoned land is
somehow unacceptable. Staff asserts, based on trends in other communities
1
.
135
and various agency reports, that we have too much land dedicated to single-
family use and not enough for multi-family use. This condition seems to be the
rationale for supporting the continued conversion of low-density land to a higher
density, e.g. RS9 to RMD. The reality is in the demand. This city has ample land
zoned and potentially available to meet a true demand for multi-family
development, but where is the demand? The growth patterns of Port Angeles do
not mirror similar sized cities in other, more urbanized, parts of the state. There
may in fact be a need for multi-family development, as there is for other
development demands, but we do not need to convert available single-family
land stock to meet that need. Establishing goals for future growth should be
based on real demand, not on the application of statistics. let's get beyond
demographic trends and look at the facts.
There is currently about 152 acres zoned RMD, citywide. Of those 152 acres,
about 125 acres (82%) are located on the west side of the city. Of those 125
acres, about 87 acres (57%) are located west of UN" Street, between 18th Street
on the south and the Strait of Juan de Fuca on the north. There are '
approximately 255 acres zoned RS-9 on the" west side", of which about 209
acres are west of "N" Street. Using these numbers, the amount of land currentlY
zoned RMD, west of "N" Street, comprises about 42% of the combined RMD/RS9'
zoned land. This certainly exceeds the 4,1 ratio that planning staff seems '
concerned is too low for the city. The fact is that much of the land currently
zoned RMD, particularly west of "N" Street, is either being used as single-family
residences or is raw - undeveloped land. Please see the attached map showing
zoning for this area.
.
These facts do not justify the conversion of any existing land to RMD, especially
in the area west of "N" Street, until all available RMD land stocks are utilized. It
is difficult to ,understand how the parcels now zoned RMD immediately west of
"N" Street and adjoining the north side of 18th Street were rationalized,
considering that the existing RMD land stock condition predated those rezones.
The only answer can be that the development of those sites was convenient to
the then applicants. Unfortunately, convenience is not a valid criterion,for making
decisions on rezone issues. Convenience cannot be offered as a "finding of
factn, as is required by law.
.
During council deliberations on the previous request it was apparent to me that"
the split in the council was between those who were concerned about the conflict
between the finding supporting the rezone and the fact of available RMD land
stock, and those who espoused their support for Serenity House. The fact is that
this rezone application has nothing to do with Serenity House; their needs, their
goals, their service to the community, the fact that they have committed to the
purchase of this land, the fact that they are proceeding with surveys and design,
nor the point that this property is convenient for them. Serenity House's
investment in this property does not entitle them to be "vested" in this project.
2
.
136
.
The applicant for this rezone could be anyone, from an agency offering a
"community ~ervice", to an individual, to a "real estate developer".
The applicant and their proposed use of the land, under the newly approved
rezone, are not germane to the issue of whether or not a parcel of land should be
up-zoned or down-zoned. Rezoning issues must be decided within a context
broader than the scope defining the specifics of a particular project proposal.
The issue here is not what Serenity House proposes to do for the community with
this propertY. That is an issue to be explored in the context of the Conditional
Use Permit. The only issue before the Commission for recommendation to the
City Council, and potentially before the Council for decision, is the justification to
convert this 4.8,acre parcel of land from RS9 to RMD and most importantly, to
make the legally binding "findings of fact" to support that conversion. I suggest to
you that the facts do not support this rezone and ask you to recommend denial.
There are other opportunities for this applicant to realize their goals, however
inconvenient a denial might appear.
, '
Thank you for your consideration of o'ur concerns.
Sincerely,
.
.
3
137
.
.
.
138
.
'<'~
~-.1"'
;..~
....#
.
.
Cj
~
I
~
~
I
;~.
~:~~
1'1/'~,
_:.1_
D
~~
~
~
~~
'0 \\.1
~~I
v1Cl
0"-
~
139 (C,{)LIJ/l)
I
.<?
\<b
il
.
n
U
(t-.
~
I
.
'<'~
~..l'
"--4.--
". "
",
.
p
<:~
J
'-,
~... I
~~
cl 'U I
'OQ.
~~
~t\.
If-,'
, "
..:,
r~J3"
"
~ f..--/
.,," '
"
(>)
/1
,
h
:,,,, \'/
I .~.
',:~ ~r 'j
~ j ~,
:\? ~
,~~ '~
.~'
March 5, 2002
To: Port Angeles City Council
From: Martha M. Ireland
20 Spath Road
Sequim, WA 98382
In support of the Serenity House of Clallam County rezone application
One day a week, I am employed as a receptionist in the Serenity House
Administrative Office, giving me familiarity with the agency's operations and logistics.
The issue of pedestrian traffic on West 18th has been raised in regard to the
proposal to move Serenity House's Single Adult Shelter from the Port of Port Angeles'
airport industrial park on the south side of West 18th, to a new location on the north side
of the street, near the administrative office.
Currently, residents of the Single Adult Shelter must walk several blocks along
West 18th and cross the street to reach the administrative office in order to pick up passes
to the YMCA, use the computer room, or catch the transit bus.
Moving the Single Adult Shelter to the new location would eliminate the need for
those people to cross West 18th. Their route of travel along West 18th would be reduced
and limited primarily to the section where sidewalks are currently available and bus
service with a bus stop is already in place. Sidewalks would be added to the new property
as part of the development plan.
Clearly, the issue of pedestrian traffic on West 18th is a strong argument in favor
of approving this rezone request.
The existence of other land that is already zoned medium density residential is not
I
germane to this petition. The parcel that is the subject of this rezone request is the only
vacant site in close proximity to the administrative office. Parcels a few blocks away
would simply move the pedestrian traffic from one section of West 18th to another, and
would not enhance staff coordination, client oversight, and facility management.
To my observation, the Single Adult Shelter should be relocated in very close
proximity to the administrative office in order to produce these efficiencies which will
benefit both the program and the neighborhood, as well as the wider community.
According to your planning director, Brad Collins, the City of Port Angeles wrote
a definition specifically to fit the Single Adult Shelter a decade ago. The City Council of
that time bravely made that definition a conditional use in the Light Industrial Zone, to
accommodate the current Single Adult Shelter. You now have an opportunity to facilitate
moving the residential Single Adult Shelter to a residential zone, freeing that industrial
site for industrial use.
I urge you to accept the recommendation of your professional planning staff by
approving this rezone request. Failing that, I suggest that you move the Single Adult
Shelter-specific use description from the Light Industrial Zone to the list of conditional
uses allowed under RS-9 zoning.
Serenity House of Clallam County has demonstrated its trustworthiness and
ability to serve the needs of this area's homeless population in a way that reduced the
burden on the city and other public sector entities. The need for this facility is great. The
traffic and oversight concerns raised by opponents are the very impacts that would be
lessened by the improved facility.
Further delay of a project which will benefit both the immediate neighborhood
and the wider community is a disservice to all.
I encourage you to act promptly to clear the regulatory hurdles that stand in the
way of this laudable community service project.
Thank you for your consideration.
~:ZL~ /J.J
Martha M. Ireland
20 Spath Road
Sequim, W A 98382
.,
March 5 2002
To: Members of Port Angeles City Council
From' Lorraine Ross, 418 East Front
Re: SERENITY HOUSE
Once again I will mIss your hearing on a replacement location for Serenity House. I am Precinct
#5 Republican Committeeman and my first obligation is to lead my precinct caucus which begins
at 7:30 p.m.
I am enclosing a copy of my letter to you November 26, 2001, in which I urged support of the
application, by revisiting it. I do not know if the location has changed or if this is a repeat of the
same request. No matter. As I stated before, the same objections will be raised if they are forced
to reapply a dozen times.
The need is here and only you can make it happen. Be brave and vote approval of their applica-
tion. It is a need that will not go away, only worsen.
Thank you for your consideration of my views.
d~-LLJ
. . . .'-~<7\~,-'- --;>
..
.J' .
November 26, 2001
To. Members of Port Angeles City Council
From Lorraine Ross, 418 East Front Street, 457-7506
Ever since the November 20 meeting of the council that I attended, I have been plagued by
the decision to deny a re-zone requested by Serenity House.
I apologize for not engaging in public hearings that were held on it. You gave a final decision
that night, or Craig Knutson did and you echoed it. Or is it final? Is there one of you who
voted with the majority that has now had second thoughts and are willing to ask for reconsi-
deration and a majority vote on the affirmative?
To you negative voters, I would ask where would you place this proposed project? Yes, I under-
stand it was a rezone, not a project. And we all know that is the process that must come first.
Serenity House is a very necessary part of this community and has been for a good number
of years. I did not attend or hear the opposition, but I bet I could write a script that would say
what was said, because the same thing is said about any change brought before the city or
county, whether it is a new store, subdivision, apartment, nursing home, day care center or
an industry.
Have you spent any time at Serenity House? That facility was really outdated decades ago.
The city would not permit it to be duplicated today, would they? Where is the city's obligation
in continued operating it as it is when an alternative has been offered? They"seem to be well
financed partly by people who once were in need of their services that made it up the hill to
independence and are willing to share their wealth.
A new.location that Serenity House might propose will face exactly the same objections as
this one, no matter where it is. It will still take some guts to vote to rescind it. This is a need that
must be met soon and I would hope the good citizens on this council would see the need to
address it so we can all watch people "graduate" from Serenity House to a brighter future.
I know enough about findings of fact and conclusions to know the planning department gives
you a list of reasons to approve and another list to disapprove. Any action you formally took
listed reasons to disapprove. You can just as easily rescind them and use the "approval"
list of facts and let this project proceed.
Thanks for your consideration. I hope to make myself more present in the future to catch
these things before they happen.
~-"
"
t:
", ce0'e"d'i >
\'--.-
- -
~
r
,
,(
.
.
.
Fe' O. RTr'.N.NG;E- lL- E'S'
: r) j!V, / t Nrl: '
,'F IJ, . ", '" '
j ~-, -' ~ ~~~
I
~, "
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
MARCH 5, 2002
To:
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM:
SUE ROBERDS, ASSISTANT PLANNER
SUBJECT:
REZONE APPLICATION - REZ 01-06
CITY OF PORT ANGELES/ CLALLAM COUNTY
Summary: The proposal is to rezone twelve (12) public properties, owned and operated as part
of the City Hall and Clallam County Courthouse operations, from their current designations to PBP,
Public Buildings and Parks.
Recommendation: The Department of Community Development recommends that the City
Council concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the rezones by
adoption of the attached ordinance rezoning the twelve (12) lots to PBP, Public Buildings and
Parks, and citing the Plannmg Commission 'sfindings and conclusions in support of that action.
Background / Analysis: Early in 2002, an inquiry from County personnel resulted in the
discovery that the east portion of the Clallam County Courthouse parking lot, located on the
northwest comer of East Fourth and Peabody Streets, is designated as RHD Residential High
Density. It was subsequently discovered that the City Hall's east parking lot, located at the
southwest comer ofthat same intersection, is zoned CO Commercial Office. The City Hall subject
site was zoned CO to accommodate the Rose House use and was not rezoned when that use ceased.
The County's east parking lot has been improperly zoned (RHD) for more than 20 years. The
County administration is in favor ofthe rezone to PBP which would facilitate any future government
development on that site. Although the City's east parking lot is zoned CO, an appropriate
designation for business and professional office use, the property is publicly owned and, as a
governmental use, should be designated PBP.
The Planning Commission conducted a public meeting on the proposal on February 13,2002. No
public comment was received. An excerpt of the Planning Commission's minutes and staffs report
are attached for your information as well as a draft ordinance in support of the rezone with attached
findings and conclusions. Staff will be available for questions.
istant Planner
raft ordinance, findings, and conclusIOns
staff report
February 13,2002 Plannmg Comm1s,lJ, Minutes
.
.
.
142
.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles rezoning the City Hall and
Clallam County Courthouse east parking lots from CO, Commercial
Office, and RHD, Residential High Density, respectively, to PBP, Public
Buildings and Parks.
.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission ofthe City of Port Angeles has held a public
hearing and recorded its recommendation to the City Council in the Planning Commission minutes
of February 13,2002; and
WHEREAS, the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (Chapter
43.21C RCW) have been met; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after conducting a public hearing and considering
the Planning Commission's recommendation, and entering its own findings and conclusions, hereby
finds that there has been a change in circumstances since the current zoning designation was adopted
and that said rezone is in the best interest of the City and its citizens and is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. The Official Zoning Map, Ordinance No. 2801, as amended, is hereby
amended to change the zoning of the following described property from RHD, Residential High
Density, to PBP, Public Buildings and Parks, as shown in the attached Exhibit A:
Lots 1-3 and 16-18, Block 170, Townsite of Port Angeles;
Lots 1-3 and 16-18, Block 67, Townsite of Port Angeles.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to attach a copy of this Ordinance to
the Official Zoning Map and to file a certified copy with the Clallam County Auditor and the
Clallam County Assessor.
Section 3. - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five (5) days
following the date of its publication by summary.
1
.
143
Section 4. - Severability If any provisions ofthis Ordinance or Its application to
any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, or application of the
provisions of the Ordinance to other persons or circumstances, is not affected.
PASSED by the City Council ofthe City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 5th day of March, 2002.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary
F IORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONS\2002-05 wpd
2
144
.
.
.
.
.
.
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF Rezone Application
- REZ 01-06 - City of Port Angeles/Clallam County
Findings
Based on the information provided in the February 13, 2002 staff report for REZ 01-06,
including all of the attachments, comments, information presented during the public
meeting, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port
Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. The proposed rezone was submitted by the City of Port Angeles Department of
Community Development on behalf of the City of Port Angeles and Clallam County.
A letter from Andy Meyer, Clallam County Planning Manager, indicated the County's
agreement with the proposed rezone application.
2. The rezone would designate Lots 1 - 3 and 16 - 18, Block 67, and Lots 1 - 3 and 16
- 18 Block 170, Townsite of Port Angeles from RHO, Residential High Density and
CO, Commercial Office, respectively, to PBP, Public Buildings and Parks.
3.
A 1995 City wide rezone identified and rezoned most properties that were not in
compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. The two
parking lot areas were overlooked in that rezone action.
4. The purpose of the City's CO zone (Section 17.20.010 of the PAMC) .. ... is a
commercial zone intended for those business, office, administrative or professional
uses which do not involve the retail sale of goods, but rather provide a service to
clients, the provision of which does not create high traffic volumes, involve extended
hours of operation, or contain impacts that would be detrimental to adjacent
residential areas." The purpose of the City's RHO Zone (17.15.010 PAMC) ..... is
a high density residential zone for multi-family residential structures. Compatible
uses may be allowed on Conditional Use Permits but the zone is still regarded as
a residential area, and commercial enterprises are not generally felt to be
compatible." The purpose of the City's PBP Zone (Section 17.40.010 of the PAM C)
is " A zoning designation for publicly-owned property, or property not suitable for
development by reason of its topography, geology, or some unusual condition or
situation. Much of the land designated may best be left as "green belts."
5.
All of the 12 lots are currently being used as parking areas for governmental
services and serve as part of the City Hall and Clallam County Courthouse
developments. The uses generate a great deal of traffic and observe extended
hours of operation.
145
Fmdmgs and ConcJuslOns - REZ 01-06
Page 2
6.
The rezone application was prepared on December 13, 2001, by the City
Department of Community Development and was determined complete on
December 13, 2001. A Notice of Development Application was placed in the
Peninsula Oailv News on January 18, 2002, with a comment written comment
period extending through February 2, 2002. No comments were received during
the 15 day development application comment period.
.
7. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)
on February 8, 2002, regarding this request.
8. The properties are designated as Commercial in the City's Comprehensive Plan and
Land Use Map. The Department Staff Report for REZ 01-06 dated February 13,
2002, identifies the Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Element Policies A.1 and A.2.,
and 0.1., as being the most relevant to the proposal.
9. Existing land uses adjacent to the subject properties are as follows:
To the north: Peabody Creek and residential trailer park
To the south:Office and residential uses
To the east: Peabody Creek, office, and residential uses
To the west: Public buildings
10. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designations adjacent to the subject site
are as follows: .
To the north: Commercial and High Density Residential
To the south:Commercial
To the east: Open Space and Commercial
To the west: Commercial
11. The zoning map designations adjacent to the subject properties are as follows:
To the north: Commercial Arterial
To the south:Commercial Office
To the east: Public Buildings and Parks and Commercial Office
To the west: Community Shopping District
12. The Planning Commission held a public meeting on the conditional use permit
proposal on February 13, 2002.
13. A change in circumstances occurred on Lots 1-3 and 16 - 18, Block 170, Townsite
of Port Angeles, the City's property, when a social service use (the Rose House
use) was removed from the site during the early 1990's. The twelve lots had been
designated Commercial Office (CO) to accommodate the Rose House use which
was relocated leaving the property available for conversion to off-street parking in
association with the abutting City Hall governmental use.
.
146
.
.
.
Findings and ConclusIOns - REZ 01-06
Page 3
Conclusions:
Based on the above listed findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby
concludes:
A. The rezone would appropriately designate the governmental uses as public
buildings and parks properties.
B. As approved, the rezone is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and is
not adverse to the public use and interest.
C. As approved, the rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
and the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically, those identified
in Finding No.6.
D. This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council, which has final
authority.
E. The rezone(s) are associated with changes in use of the two governmental sites.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of March 5, 2002.
Glen Wiggins, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
147
.
.
.
148
.
.
.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
FORT ANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT
Chair Nutter and Planning Commission
Sue Roberds, Assistant Planner
February 13,2002
RE:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
REZ 01-06
Clallam County and City of Port Angeles
Same
Lots 1-3 and 16-18, Block 67, and Lots 1-3 and 16-18 Block 170 Townsite of
Port Angeles
Rezone of 12 Townsite lots from RHD, Residential High Density, and CO,
Commercial Office to PBP, Public Buildings and Parks
RECOMMENDATION:
The Departmellt recommellds that the Plallllillg Commissioll forward a recommelldatioll of
approval of Rezolle REZ 01-06 to the City Coullcil based Oil the 12 filldillgs alld 4 conclusiolls
foulld ill Attac/f~ellt A to this report.
PROPOSAL:
Designation of government properties from their current zoning designations to the appropriate
classification for public buildings and parks properties.
LOCATION AND EXISTING DEVELOPMENT:
The subject properties are developed as the east Clallam County and east City Hall parking lots, and
are located northwest and southwest respectively of the intersection of East Fourth Street and
Peabody Streets. The two sites are comprised of 6 lots each for a total of 12 Townsite lots in the
149
Rezone ApplicatIOn - REZ 01-06
Clallam County/Cay of Port Angeles
February 13, 2002
Page 2
City's North Central Planning area. Each 6-lot site is part of the larger respective abutting .
govennnent development. A 1995 City wide rezone identified and rezoned most properties that were
not in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. The two parking lot areas
were overlooked in that rezone action.
Land uses adjacent to the subject properties are as follows:
To the north:
To the south:
To the east:
To the west:
Peabody Creek, residential trailer park, and commercial
Office uses and residential
Peabody Creek, office, and residential
Public buildings and parks
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The SEP A Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on February 8,
2002, for the proposal. This action fulfills the City's responsibility under the State Environmental
Policy Act (RCW 43.21C).
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan establishes the long range goals and policies ofthe City. It is the basis upon
which City officials are to make land use decisions. Any project proposed in the City must be
consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
.
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map identifies the sites as Commercial (C). Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map designations adjacent to the subject site are as follows:
To the north:
To the south:
To the east:
To the west:
High Density Residential
Commercial
Commercial and Open Space
Commercial
The Comprehensive Plan's goals and policies have been reviewed with regard to the proposed
application. The following policies appear to be the most relevant to the proposal:
Land Use Element. Goal A. Policy No.1. - "The Comprehensive Plan Land use map should
be used as a conceptual guide for determining current and long range zoning and other land
use decisions. The map's land use designations are zntended to show areas where general
land use types are allowed. The area between land use designations should be considered
an imprecise margin in order to provide flexibility in determining the boundary of such areas.
When determining appropriate zoning designations for an area near a margin, the goals,
policies and objectives of the Land Use Element should take precedence."
Land Use Element. Goal A. Policv No.2 - "Allland use decisions and approvals made by
the City Council and/or any of its appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and its land use map. "
150
.
Rezone Application - REZ 01-06
Clal/am County/Cay of Port Angeles
February 13,2002
Page 3
.
Land Use Element. Goal D. Policv No.2 - "Public uses such as government offices, public
service buildings, and other public and quasi-public facilities and services may be allowed
in commercially designated areas.
ZONING ORDINANCE:
As stated previously, the Zoning Ordinance is the primary implementing ordinance for the
Comprehensive Plan. It establishes what types of uses are permitted and where they may be located
in the City. It also establishes minimum design standards for such uses. Like the Comprehensive
Plan, any project proposed in the City must be consistent with the regulations of the zone in which
it is located.
The Zoning Map currently identifies the Clallam County site as RHD, Residential High Density, and
the City of Port Angeles site as CO, Commercial Office. The purpose and intent ofthese zones as
well as the proposed PBP Zone are as follows:
.
17.20.010 PAMC (CO) Zone Purvose: "This is a commercial zone intendedfor those
business, office, administrative or professional uses which do not involve the retail
sale of goods, but rather provide a service to clients, the provision of which does not
create high traffic volumes, involve extended hours of operation, or contain impacts
that would be detrimental to adjacent residential areas."
17.15.010 P AMC (RHD) Zone Purvose. "This is a high density residential zone for
multi-family residential structures. Compatible uses may be allowed on Conditional
Use Permits but the zone is still regarded as a residential area, and commercial
enterprises are not generally felt to be compatible. "
17.40.010 PAMe PBP Zone - A zoning designation for publicly-owned property, or
property not suitable for development by reason of its topography, geology, or some
unusual condition or situation. Much of the land designated may best be left as
"green belts ".
Zoning Map designations adjacent to the subject sites are as follows:
To the west:
Commercial Arterial
Commercial Office
Public Buildings and Parks, Commercial Office, and Residential High
Density
Public Buildings and Parks
To the north:
To the south:
To the east:
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS:
. The Public Works Department indicated they had no comments on the proposed rezone.
The Fire Department indicated they had no obieg\ons to the proposed rezone.
Rezone Appilcation - REZ 01-06
Clal/am County/City of Port Angeles
February 13. 2002
Page 4
The Light Department indicated they had no objections to the proposed rezone.
There were no public comments received during the posting and publication period which lasted from
January 18,2002, to February 2,2002.
152
.
.
.
.
.
.
Rezone ApplicatIOn - REZ 01 -06
Clal/am County/City of Port Angeles
February 13, 2002
Page 5
A TT ACHMENT "A"
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF REZONE REZ 01-06 FOR CLALLAM
COUNTY AND THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES:
Findings
Based on the information provided in the February 13,2002 staff report for REZ 01-06, including all
of the attaclunents, comments, information presented during the public meeting, and the Planning
Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby
finds that:
1. The proposed rezone was submitted by the City of Port Angeles Department of Community
Development on behalf of the City of Port Angeles and Clallam County. A letter from Andy
Meyer, Clallam County Planning Manager, indicates the County's agreement with the
proposed rezone application.
2. The rezone would designate Lots 1 - 3 and 16 - 18, Block 67, and Lots 1 - 3 and 16 - 18 Block
170, Townsite of Port Angeles from RHD, Residential High Density and CO, Commercial
Office, respectively, to PBP, Public Buildings and Parks.
3.
A 1995 City wide rezone identified and rezoned most properties that were not in compliance
with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. The two parking lot areas were
overlooked in that rezone action.
4. The purpose of the City's CO zone (Section 17.20.010 of the PAMC) " ... is a commercial
zone intended for those business, office, administrative or professional uses which do not
involve the retail sale of goods, but rather provzde a service to clients, the provision of which
does not create high traffic volumes, involve extended hours of operation, or contain impacts
that would be detrimental to adjacent residential areas." The purpose of the City's RHD
Zone (17.15.010 PAMC) "... is a high density residential zone for multi-family residential
structures. Compatible uses may be allowed on Conditional Use Permits but the zone is still
regarded as a residential area, and commercial enterprises are not generally felt to be
compatible." The purpose ofthe City's PBP Zone (Section 17.40.010 of the PAM C) is "A
zoning designation for publicly-owned property, or property not suitable for development by
reason of its topography, geology, or some unusual condition or situation. Much of the land
designated may best be left as "green belts. "
5. All of the 12 lots are currently being used as parking areas for governmental services and
serve as part of the City Hall and Clallam County Courthouse developments. The uses
generate a great deal of traffic and observe extended hours of operation.
6.
The rezone application was prepared on December 13, 2001 by the City Department of
Community Development and was determined complete on December 13,2001. A Notice
of Development Application was placed in the Peninsula Dailv News on January 18,2002,
with a comment written comment perio,Q ~ending through February 2, 2002. No comments
were received during the 15 day develJ~nt application comment period.
Rezone ApplicatIOn - REZ 01-06
Clal/am County/Cuy of Port Angeles
February 13,2002
Page 6
8.
The SEP A Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on
February 8, 2002, regarding this request.
.
9. The properties are designated as Commercial in the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use
Map. The Department Staff Report for REZ 02-02 dated February 13,2002, identifies the
Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Element Policies A.1 and A.2., and D.1., as being the most
relevant to the proposal.
10. Existing land uses adjacent to the subject properties are as follows:
To the north: Peabody Creek and residential trailer park
To the south: Office and residential uses
To the east: Peabody Creek, office, and residential uses
To the west: Public buildings
11. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designations adjacent to the subject site are as
follows:
To the north: Commercial and High Density Residential
To the south: Commercial
To the east: Open Space and Commercial
To the west: Commercial
12.
The zoning map designations adjacent to the subject properties are as follows:
To the north: Commercial Arterial
To the south: Commercial Office
To the east: Public Buildings and Parks and Commercial Office
To the west: Community Shopping District
.
Conclusi ons:
Based on the above listed findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby concludes:
A. The rezone would appropriately designate the governmental uses as public buildings and
parks properties.
B. As approved, the rezone is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and is not adverse
to the public use and interest.
C. As approved, the rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and the
goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically, those identified in Finding No.
6.
D. This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council, which has final authority.
.
154
.
.
.
---------------------....
~,-,
Planmng CommissIOn Mmutes - February 13. 2002 ~
-.-'- "- -- - ----- ---~-_.--------.-
REZONE APPLICATION - REZ 01-06 - CLALLAM COUNTY/CITY OF
PORT ANGELES. 223 East Fourth Street and 321 East Fifth Street: Rezone of
the east 6 lots of each government site that are incorrectly designated as
Residential High Density and Commercial Office respectively. Each site should
be identified as Public Buildings and Parks.
Assistant Planner Sue Roberds reviewed the staffs report recommending approval of the
rezone as proposed. [The Commission took a break at 9:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened at
9:40 p.m.] Following brief discussion, Commissioner Hewins moved to recommend approval
of the rezone as proposed citing the following findings and conclusions:
Findings
Based on the information provided in the February 13, 2002 staff report for REZ 02-02,
including all ofthe attachments, comments, information presented during the public hearing, and
the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port Angeles Planning
Commission hereby finds that:
1.
The proposed rezone was submitted by the City of Port Angeles Department of
Community Development on behalf of the City of Port Angeles and Clallam County.
A letter from Andy Meyer, Clallam County Planning Manager, indicates the County's
agreement with the proposed rezone application.
2. The rezone would designate Lots 1 - 3 and 16 - 18, Block 67, and Lots 1 - 3 and 16 - 18
Block 170, Townsite of Port Angeles from RHD, Residential High Density and CO,
Commercial Office, respectively, to PBP, Public Buildings and Parks.
3. A 1995 City wide rezone identified and rezoned most properties that were not in
compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. The two parking
lot areas were overlooked in that rezone action.
4.
The purpose of the City's CO zone (Section 17.20.010 of the PAMC) " ... is a
commercial zone intended for those business, office, administrative or professional uses
which do not involve the retail sale of goods, but rather provide a service to clients, the
provision of which does not create high traffic volumes, involve extended hours of
operation, or contain impacts that would be detrimental to adjacent residential areas. "
The purpose ofthe City's RHD Zone (17.15.010 PAMC) "... is a high density residential
zone for multi-family residential structures. Compatible uses may be allowed on
Conditional Use Permits but the zone is still regarded as a residential area, and
commercial enterprises are not generally felt to be compatible." The purpose of the
City's PBP Zone (Section 17.40.010 of the PAMC) is "A zoning designation for
publicly-owned property, or property not suitable for development by reason of its
topography, geology, or some unusual condition or situation. Much of the land
designated may best be left as "green belts. "
155
Plannmg CommISSIOn Mmutes - February J 3, 2002
5.
All ofthe 12 lots are currently being used as parking areas for governmental services and
serve as part of the City Hall and Clallam County Courthouse developments. The uses
generate a great deal oftraffic and observe extended hours of operation.
.
6. The rezone application was prepared on December 13, 2001 by the City Department of
Community Development and was determined complete on December 13, 2001. A
Notice of Development Application was placed in the Peninsula Dailv News on January
18, 2002, with a comment written comment period extending through February 2, 2002.
No comments were received during the 15 day development application comment
period.
7. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on
February 8, 2002, regarding this request.
7. The properties are designated as Commercial in the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land
Use Map. The Department Staff Report for REZ 02-02 dated February 13, 2002,
identifies the Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Element Policies A.1 and A.2., and D.l.,
as being the most relevant to the proposal.
9.
Existing land uses adjacent to the subject properties are as follows:
To the north: Peabody Creek and residential trailer park
To the south: Office and residential uses
To the east: Peabody Creek, office, and residential uses
To the west: Public buildings
.
10. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designations adjacent to the subject site are as
follows:
To the north: Commercial and High Density Residential
To the south: Commercial
To the east: Open Space and Commercial
To the west: Commercial
11. The zoning map designations adjacent to the subject properties are as follows:
To the north: Commercial Arterial
To the south: Commercial Office
To the east: Public Buildings and Parks and Commercial Office
To the west: Community Shopping District I
12. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the conditional use permit proposal
on February 13, 2002.
.
156
.
.
.
Plannzng Commission Mznutes - February 13, 2002
Conclusions:
Based on the above listed findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby
concludes:
A. The rezone would appropriately designate the governmental uses as public buildings and
parks properties.
B. As approved, the rezone is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and is not
adverse to the public use and interest.
C. As approved, the rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and
the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically, those identified in
Finding No.6.
D. This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council, which has final authority.
Commissioner Schramm seconded the motion which passed 6 - O.
157
.
.
.
FORT,ANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
MARCH 5, 2002
To:
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM:
SUE ROBERDS, ASSISTANT PLANNER
SUBJECT:
MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS - MCA 01-02
CITY OF PORT ANGELES - ADMINISTRA TlVE AMENDMENTS
Summary: The proposal is intended to make minor amendments to the Port Angeles Municipal
Code clarifying, correcting, and streamlining certain existing procedures and requirements.
Recommendation: The Department of Community Development recommends that the City
Council concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approve the proposed
amendments by adoption of the attached ordinance citing the Planning Commission's findings and
conclusions in support of the action.
Background / Analysis: Throughout the year staff notes various sections in the Municipal Code that
may need clarification as they do not match current interpretation or policy or are obviously in error.
The information is then compiled for a yearly review by the Planning Commission for a
recommendation to the City Council on an appropriate action. This year's list of proposed
amendments to the Port Angeles Municipal Code includes amendments to Titles 2 (Board of
Adjustment), 15 (Environment), and 17 (Zoning). The minor amendments are intended to refine
wording, correct obvious errors, correct titles of City departments and positions that have changed,
and clarify established procedures and the intentions of certain requirements. Specific proposals and
justification for the amendments are included in the attached staff report. Also included for your
review is an excerpt of the Planning Commissin's Minutes of both the December 12,2001, and
February 13,2002, public hearings where the amendments were considered. Staffwill be available
for questions.
Attachments:
draft ordinance, fmdmgs, and conclusions
staff report
Planning Commission Mmute Excerpts
159
.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN
ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, making minor
administrative changes to the City's land use regulations, and
amending Ordinances 1709, 1796, 2312, 2797, as amended, and
Chapters 2.52, 15.04, 17.01, and 17.22 of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Ordinance 1796 as amended and Chapter 2.52 ofthe Port Angeles Municipal
Code are hereby amended by amending P AMC 2.52.080 to read as follows:
2.52.080 Variance - Application.
A. All application for variances permitted by this Chapter shall be submitted in
.
writing to the office of the rlanning Department Department of Community Development office.
Each such application shall contain the name and mailing address of the applicant or
applicants, the legal description of the property for which the variance is requested, the nature of
the variance requested and a concise statement as to the reasons why such property is needed for
and suited to such variance. The application shall be accompanied by a plot plan, drawn to scale,
showing the dimensions of any and all existing structures and all structures to be erected on the
property involved and the yard areas thereof. The Board or rlanning DepaItment Community
Development personnel may, at any time, require the applicant to furnish such additional written
information as may be necessary to enable the Board to determine whether such application should
or should not be granted. With each application, filed for a special property use, there shall be
paid by the applicant, at the time of filing the application with the office of the rlanning
.
161
- 1 -
Department, Department of Community Development a fee in an amount to be set by the City
Council by Resolution from time to time, to defray the City's costs and expenses in processing
.
such application, including the publication and mailing ofthe notices hereinafter required. All fees
so collected by the office of the PlalJ:ning Department Department of Community Development
shall be surrendered at least once each month to the office of the City Treasurer who shall deposit
the same in the City's General Fund.
B. The Planning Department of Community Development shall fix a time, date
and place for f! public hearing on such application, which date shall not be less than ten fifteen
@ days after notice given in the following manner, except, that the final notice to be published
in the official newspapeI shall not be published more than three days prior to the date of said
hearing:
1. By United States mail addressed to the applicant and to the owners of .
all adjoining or abutting property. (Property separated from the proposed use by a street, highway
or other public road or alley shall be construed to be adjoining or abutting for the purpose of
giving notice; and notices addressed to the last known address of the person making the latest
property tax payment shall be deemed proper notice to the owner of such property.);
2. By not less than two printed or written notices posted in a conspicuous
place at or near the location of the proposed use;
3. By publishing two notices thereof in the official newspaper of the City-;-
such notices to be published at least three day s apart. Such notices shall contain the name of the
applicant or applicants, the legal description of the property involved, the special property use
requested, the date, time and place of the public hearing thereon and shall specify that any person
interested may appear at such public hearing and be heard either for or against such application. .
162 - 2 -
.
C. At such public hearing, the Board shall proceed to hear all persons present who
desire to be heard either for or against such application and shall render its decision upon such
application at the conclusion of such hearing or as soon thereafter as reasonably possible. Any
building permit thereafter issued for such property shall be in accordance with and subject to all
terms and conditions contained in the decision of the Board.
D. The Board shall maintain in the office of the Planning Dcpartmcnt Department
of Community Development full and complete written records of all proceedings, factual findings
and conclusions reached on any and all such applications. (Ord. 2525 ~1, 3/15/89; Ord. 1887 ~4,
7/15/76; Ord. 1976 ~8, 7/26/73.)
Section 2. Ordinance 2312 as amended and Chapter 15.04 of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code are amended by amending PAMC 15.04.030 to read as follows:
.
15.04.030 General Requirements. This part contains the basic requirements that apply
to the SEPA process. The City adopts the following sections of Chapter 197-11 of the Washington
Administrative Code by reference:
WAC 197-11-040 Definitions
-050 Lead agency
-055 Timing of the SEP A process
-060 Content of environmental review
-070 Limitations on actions during SEP A process
-080 Incomplete or unavailable information
-090 Supporting documents
.
-100 Information required of applicants.
-158 Reliance on existing plans, laws, and regulations.
1 63 - 3 -
-164 Planned actions - Definitions and criteria.
-168 Ordinances or resolutions designating planned actions - Procedures for
.
adoption
-172 Planned actions - Project review.
-908 Critical Areas
(Ord. 2977 ~3 (part), 12/26/97; Ord. 2312 ~1, 10/1/84.)
Section 3. Ordinance 1709 as amended and Chapter 17.01 of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code are hereby amended by amending PAMC 17 .01.010 to read as follows:
17.01.010 Purpose. This comprehensive Ordinance is adopted for the following purposes:
A. To implement the requirements of the State Growth Management Act of 1990
through the goals, policies, and objectives of the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan by dividing the
City into zones restricting and regulating therein the location, construction, reconstruction, .
alteration, and use of buildings, structures and land for residential, business, commercial,
manufacturing, public, and other specified uses. (Ord. 2861 S 1 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 S 1 (part),
1/17/92; Ord. 1709 ~1 (part), 12/22/70.)
B. To protect the character and maintain the stability of residential, commercial,
manufacturing, and public areas within the City, and to promote the orderly and appropriate
development of such areas. (Ord. 2861 S 1 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 S 1 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709
S 1 (part), 12/22/70)
C. To regulate the intensity of use of lots and parcels of land, and to determine the
spaces surrounding buildings necessary to provide adequate light, air, privacy, and access to
property. (Ord. 2861 S 1 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 S 1 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 S 1 (part), 12/22/70)
D. To sustain natural landscapes, corridors, and habitats for fish and wildlife and to.
- 4 -
164
.
provide relieffrom the urban landscape within the community through the designation of open space
areas. (Ord. 2861 S 1 (part), 3/17/95)
E. To limit congestion in the public streets and to protect the public health, safety,
convenience, and general welfare by providing for off-street parking of motor vehicles, the loading
and unloading of commercial vehicles, public transit access, and pedestrian safety. (Ord. 2861 S 1
(part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 Sl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 Sl (part), 12/22/70)
F. To establish building lines and the location of buildings designed for residential,
commercial, manufacturing, public, or other uses within such lines. (Ord. 2861 S 1 (part), 3/17/95;
Ord. 2668 S 1 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 S 1 (part), 12/22/70)
G. To prevent the overcrowding of land and undue concentration of structures and to
preserve existing unusual, unique, and interesting features of the natural landscape so far as is
possible and appropriate in each zone by regulating the use and the bulk of buildings in relation to
the land surrounding them. (Ord. 2861 Sl (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 Sl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709
S 1 (part), 12/22/70)
H. To provide protection from fire, explosion, noxious fumes, and other hazards and to
maintain the quality of life in the interest of public health, safety, comfort, and general welfare by
establishing minimum level of service standards throughout the City. (Ord. 2861 S 1 (part), 3/17/95;
Ord. 2668 Sl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 Sl (part), 12/22/70)
1. To prevent such additions to, and alteration or remodeling of, existing buildings or
structures as would not comply with the restrictions and limitations imposed hereunder. (Ord.2861
Sl (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 Sl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 Sl (part), 12/22/70)
J. To prohibit uses, buildings, or structures which are incompatible with the character
of the permitted uses within specified zones. (Ord. 2861 S 1 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 S 1 (part),
.
.
165
- 5 -
1/17/92; Ord. 170991 (part), 12/22170)
K. To conserve the taxable value ofland and buildings throughout the City. (Ord.2861
91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 266891 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 170991 (part), 12/22170)
L. To encourage the preservation of historic or culturally significant sites and structures
throughout the City. (Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95)
M. To define and to limit the powers and duties ofthe administrative officers and bodies
as provided herein and to protect the private property rights of landowners from arbitrary,
capricious, and discriminatory actions. (Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 91 (part), 1/17/92;
Ord. 1709 91 (part), 12/22170)
N. To improve the variety, quality, availability, and affordability of the housing
.
opportunities in the City. (Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95)
O. Zoning Intentions:
.
1. RS-7 Zone - This is a low density residential zone intended to create and
preserve urban single family residential neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family
homes on standard Townsite-size lots. Uses which are compatible with and functionally related to
a single family residential environment may also be located in this zone. (Ord. 2861 91 (part),
3/17/95; Ord. 266891 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 238591 (part), 5/18/86; Ord. 170991 (part), 12/22170)
2. RS-9 Zone - This is a low density residential zone intended to create and
preserve urban single family residential neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family
homes on larger than standard Townsite-size lots. Uses that are compatible with and functionally
related to a single family residential environment may be located in this zone. (Ord. 2861 9 I (part),
3/17/95; Grd. 2668 91 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 238591 (part), 5/18/86; Ord. 170991 (part), 12/22170)
3. R TP Zone - This is a medium density residential zone intended for mobile home.
1 66 - 6 -
.
occupancies, and the area is regarded as essentially residential in character. (Ord. 2861 S 1 (part),
3/17/95; Ord. 2715 Sl, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 Sl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 Sl (part), 12/22170))
4. RMD Zone - This is a medium density residential zone, which allows a mix of
single family, duplexes and apartments at a density greater than single family neighborhoods but less
than the RHD Zone. The permitted uses in the RMD Zone are also intended to be more restrictive
than the RHD Zone. Commercial uses are not considered to be compatible. (Ord. 2861 S 1 (part),
3/17/95; Ord. 2715 Sl, 10/16/92)
5. RHD Zone - This is a high density residential zone for multi-family structures.
Compatible uses may be allowed on Conditional Use Permits, but the zone is still regarded as a
residential area, where commercial enterprises are not generally felt to be compatible. (Ord.2861
SI (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 SI, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 Sl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 Sl (part),
12/22170)
.
.
6. PRD Overlay Zone - This overlay zone is to provide alternative zoning
regulations which permit and encourage design flexibility, conservation and protection of natural
critical areas, and innovation in residential developments to those regulations found in the
underlying zone. It is intended that a Planned Residential Development will result in a residential
environment of higher quality than traditionallot-by-Iot development by use of a design process
which includes within the site design all the components of a residential neighborhood, such as open
space, circulation, building types, and natural features, in a manner consonant with the public health,
safety, and welfare. It is also intended that a Planned Residential Development may combine a
number ofland use decisions such as conditional use permits, rezones, and subdivisions into a single
project review process to encourage timely public hearings and decisions and to provide for more
open space and transitional housing densities than is required or may be permitted between single
167 - 7-
family and multi-family zones. The consolidation of permit reviews does not exempt applicant(s)
.
from meeting the regulations and submitting the fees and applications normally required for the
underlying permit processes. (Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 91, 10/16/92; Ord. 265791
(part), 12/13/91; Ord. 203891 (part), 7/29/79)
7. CO Zone - This is a commercial zone intended for those business, office,
administrative, or professional uses which do not involve the retail sale of goods, but rather provide
a service to clients, the provision of which does not create high traffic volumes, involve extended
hours of operation, or contain impacts that would be detrimental to adjacent residential areas.
(Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 91, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 91 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 2109 92,
12/7/80)
8. CN Zone - This is a commercial zone intended to create and preserve areas for
businesses which are of the type providing the goods and services for the day-to-day needs of the .
surrounding residential neighborhoods. Businesses in this zone shall occur on sites no larger than
one acre and shall be located and designed to encourage both pedestrian and vehicular access and
to be compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods. (Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715
91,10/16/92; Ord. 2668 91 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 2553 1,12/2/89)
9. CSD Zone - This is a commercial zone oriented primarily to those businesses
serving the daily needs of the surrounding residential neighborhoods but is slightly less restrictive
than the CN zone and as such provides a transition area from the most restrictive commercial zones
to those oflesser restrictions. Businesses in this zone may occur on sites of varying sizes and shall
be located at the intersections of arterial streets of sufficient size to satisfy traffic demand and at the
boundaries of neighborhoods so that more than one neighborhood may be served. (Ord. 2861 91
(part), 3/17/95; Ord. 279792,2/11/94, Ord. 2715 91, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 91 (part), 1/17/92; ord..
168 - 8 -
.
1709 91 (part), 12/22/70)
10. CA Zone - This is a commercial zone intended to create and preserve areas for
business serving the entire City and needing an arterial location because ofthe nature of the business
or intensity of traffic generated by the business. (Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 91,
10/16/92; Ord. 266891 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 229391 (part), 4/4/84)
11. CBD Zone - This is a commercial zone intended to strengthen and preserve the
area commonly known as the Downtown for major retail, service, financial, and other commercial
operations that serve the entire community, the regional market, and tourists. It is further the
purpose of this zone to establish standards to improve pedestrian access and amenities and to
increase public enjoyment of the shoreline. (Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 271591, 10/16/92;
Ord. 2668 91 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 230391 (part), 7/4/84; Ord. 170991 (part), 12/22/70)
.
12. IP Zone - This is an industrial zone intended to create and preserve areas for
office, commercial, and industrial uses devoid of exterior nuisances in a planned, park-like setting.
(Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95)
13. IL Zone - This is an industrial zone intended to create and preserve areas for
industrial uses which are largely devoid of exterior nuisances in close proximity to airports and
.
highways. (Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 271591,10/16/92; Ord. 2668 91 (part), 1/17/92;
Ord. 2329 91 (part), 3/11/85)
14. IH Zone - This is the least restrictive industrial zone intended to be the area in
which heavy industry could develop causing the least impact on other land uses. (Ord. 2861 91
(part), 3/17/95; Ord. 271591, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 91 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 170991 (part), 12/22/70)
15. PBP Zone - A zoning designation for publicly-owned property, or property less
suitable for development by reason of its topography, geology, or some unusual condition or
1 69 - 9 -
situation. Much of the land so designated may best be left as "green belts". (Ord. 2861 Sl (part),
3/17/95; Ord. 2715 Sl, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 Sl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 Sl (part), 12/22/70)
.
16. FL Zone - A zoning designation for privately-owned property not intended for
future conversion to urban development much of which property may best be used for commercial
timber production. (Ord. 2861 ~ 1 (part), 3/17/95)
161, Home Occupation Conditional Use - The purpose of this Chapter is to ensure
that an occupation or business undertaken within a dwelling unit located in a residential use district
is incidental and subordinate to the primary use and is compatible with the residential character of
the neighborhood. (Ord. 2948 S5 (part) 2/14/97; Ord. 2861 S 1 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 S 1,
10/16/92; Ord. 2668 Sl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 2103 S2, 10/18/80)
H~. Bed and Breakfast Conditional Use - The purpose of this Chapter is to ensure
that a bed and breakfast is compatible with its surrounding properties, and when located in a .
residential neighborhood, to preserve the residential character of the neighborhood and the
surrounding residences. (Ord. 2948 S5 (part) 2/14/97; Ord. 2861 Sl (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 Sl,
10/16/92; Ord. 2668 S 1 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 2483 S 1 (part), 3/23/88)
18-2.. Adult Entertainment Conditional Use - The purpose ofthis Chapter is to ensure
that adult entertainment businesses are appropriately located and operated within the City of Port
Angeles, are compatible with uses allowed within the City, and are conducive to the public health,
safety, and welfare. (Ord. 2948 S5 (part) 2/14/97; Ord. 2861 Sl (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 Sl,
10/16/92; Ord. 2668 S 1 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 2511 S 1, 10/4/88)
+920. Retail Stand Conditional Use - The purpose of this Chapter is to ensure that
retail stands are appropriately located in the commercial and public building areas, are compatible
with the uses allowed in such areas, are conducive to the public health, safety, and welfare, and.
170 - 10 -
.
promote the diversity of retail stand activity. (Ord. 2948 S5 (part) 2/14/97; Ord. 2861 SI (part),
3/17/95; Ord. 2715 SI, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 SI (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 2070 SI (part), 3/29/80)
261. Wrecking Yard Conditional Use - The purpose of this Chapter is to ensure that
licensed wrecking yards are appropriately located, are compatible with uses allowed within the City,
and are conducive to the public health, safety, and welfare. (Ord. 2948 S5 (part) 2/14/97; Ord. 2861
S 1 (part), 3/17/95)
Section 4. Ordinance 2797 as amended and Chapter 17.22 of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code are hereby amended by amending P AMC 17.22.200 to read as follows:
.
17.22.200 Development Standards.
A. Area and Dimensional Requirements:
1. Minimum Lot Area: 7,000 square feet for non-residential uses. Residential
uses shall comply with the RHD Zone area requirements.
2. Minimum Lot Width: 50 feet.
3. Minimum Yard Requirements
No structure shall be built within 15 feet of an alley that abuts a 1 Gsidc,ntial
zoning classification 01 of any property that has a residential zoning classification. No loading
structure or dock with access onto the alley shall be built within 15 feet of an alley. Driveway access
onto an alley shall maintain a vision clearance triangle. The vision clearance triangle shall extend
10 feet along the alley and 15 feet along the edge of the driveway, measured from the point of
intersection of each side of the driveway and the alley right-of-way line.
4. Maximum Lot Coverage - 50%.
5. Maximum Height - 35 feet. (Ord. 3042 S3 (part) 1/28/00; Ord. 2977 S 1 (part),
12/26/97; Ord. 2863 S3, 4/14/95; Ord. 2861 S 1 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2797 S4, 2/11/94)
Section 5 - Severability. If any provisions ofthis Ordinance, or its application to any person
or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder ofthe Ordinance, or application of the provisions
of the Ordinance to other persons or circumstances, is not affected.
Section 6 - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect five days following the date of
its publication by summary.
.
171 -11-
.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council
held on the day of , 2002.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
Craig D. Knutson ,City Attorney
By Summary
.
PUBLISHED:
F IORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONS\200 1-34 ord wpd
.
- 12 -
172
.
.
.
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF MUNICIPAL CODE
AMENDMENT - MCA 01-02 - CITY OF PORT ANGELES.
Findings:
Based on the information provided in the Department of Community Development
Memorandum in support of Port Angeles Municipal Code Amendment MCA 01-02 dated
December 12, 2001, including all information in the public record file, comments and
testimony presented during the public hearing, the discussion and deliberation, the City of
Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. The applicant, City of Port Angeles, proposed Municipal Code Amendment to
change several sections ofthe Port Angeles Municipal Code, including Chapters 2.52
Board of Adjustment, 15.04 Environmental Policy, and Title 17, Zoning.
2.
The changes proposed to Chapter 2.52 Board of Adjustment are suggested for
compliance with current state laws, specifically R.C.W. 36.70.840, and would
therefore comply with other public notification time periods adopted by the City
under the State's Regulatory Reform Act.
3. Changes proposed to Chapter 15.04 are intended to streamline those procedures
dealing with acceptable development activities in critical areas of the City such that
exemptions permitted under WAC 197-11-980 are adopted by reference in Section
15.04.040 - General Regulations.
4. Corrections are proposed throughout the Municipal Code which reflect that the
Planning Department and Building Division have been combined into the
"Department of Community Development". Therefore, references to "Planning
Department" have been changed to " Department of Community Development" and
the reference to "Planning Director" has been amended to read" Community
Development Director".
5. Corrections are proposed to reflect that the "Planning Department" is now the
"Department of Community Development;" change the title "Planning Director" to
"Community Development Director;" "Public Works Director" to "Director of Public
Works and Utilities;" and "Building Inspector" to "Building Official".
6.
Typographical corrections have been made to the titles "Home Occupations
Conditional Usc Permit", "Bed and Breakfast Conditional Usc Permit", and Retail
Stand Conditional Usc Permit", to reflect the intended title of the chapters.
173
Fmdmgs and ConclusIOns - MCA 01-02
March 5, 2002
7.
The listing for Chapter 17.01 FL Forest Zone was added because it was inadvertently
left out of the Chapter 17.01 listings when adopted in 1995.
.
8. Per Section 17.96.100 Amendments, any amendments adopted by the City Council
may be modified from the form in which they were advertised within the limits
necessary to relate properly such amendment or amendments to the Zoning
Regulations. Final action on such modifications shall be subject to review and report
of the Planning Commission prior to final passage by the City Council.
9. The City and County are jointly proposing a change in the Zoning Map to reflect the
public uses of the east parking areas, respectively, along Peabody Street.
Specifically, Lots 1 - 3 and 16 - 18 Block 67 TP A (City), and 1 - 3 and 17 - 20 Block
56, TP A (County). The properties are owned by government agencies and are
developed and function as government and public uses. It is proposed that the
designated zoning of the City's property be changed from OC, Office Commercial,
to PBP, Public Buildings and Parks, and the County from RHD, Residential High
Density, to PBP.
10. The City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map have been reviewed with respect
to the proposal.
11. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 12,2001, which was .
continued to February 13,2002, in consideration of proposed amendments to the Port
Angeles Municipal Code.
Conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the Department of Community Development Staff Report
dated December 12,2001 for MCA 01-02 including all information in the public record file,
comments and testimony presented during the public hearing, the Planning Commission
discussion and deliberation, and the above listed findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning
Commission hereby concludes that:
1. The Municipal Code administrative amendments are consistent with the goals and
policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan including, but not limited to, Growth
Management Element Policy A(l), and Policy l(g).
3. The amendments will result in improved public service relating to permit processing and
regulation integration.
.
174
Fmdmgs and ConclusIOns - MCA 01-02
March 5, 2002
.
4.
The proposed amendments are in the public use and interest.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of March 5, 2002.
Glen Wiggins, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
.
.
175
.
.
.
176
.
.
.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT
December 12,2001
Chair Nutter and Planning Commissioners
Sue Roberds, Planning Specialist
RE:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
PROPOSAL:
MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - MCA 01-02
REZONE - REZ 01-02
City of Port Angeles
City-wide
Proposed Administrative Amendments to the City's Municipal Code
RECOMMENDATION
Department of Community Development staff recommends that the Planning Commission
forward a recommendation of approval of MCA 01-02 to the City Council based on the findings
and conclusions in Attachment A to this report.
BACKGROUND
During the year, staff notes sections in the Municipal Code that may need clarification, do not match
current interpretation or policy, or are obviously in error. The information is then compiled for a
yearly review by the Planning Commission for a recommendation to the City Council for action. This
year's list of proposed amendments to the Port Angeles Municipal Code includes amendments to
Titles 2 (Board of Adjustment), 16 (Subdivision), and 17 (Zoning). The minor amendments refine
wording, correct obvious errors, and clarify existing procedures and requirements.
177
MeA 01-02
December 12,2001
Page 2
TITLES 2 (Board of Adjustment). 15 (Environment). 16 (Stlbdi vision). 17 (Zoning):
Recommendation:
These chapters need to be searched and corrected to reflect the change in department name
from "Planning Department" to "Department of Community Development;" change the title
"Planning Director" to "Community Development Director;" "Public Works Director" to
"Director of Public Works and Utilities;" and "Building Inspector" to "Building Official".
.
Justffication:
Changes have been made in personnel titles and should be reflected in the body of the
Municipal Code for clarity.
SECTION 2.52.080 - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
Recommendation:
Some time ago the State RCWs were changed amending the time period requirements for
public notification for those applications that are heard by the Board of Adjustment. The notification
period previously required that two notices be published in the newspaper not more than 10 days, nor
less than 3 days, prior to the meeting, on the same day of the week for two consecutive weeks. That
requirement was significantly revised under RCW 36.70.840 to be that "notice shall be given at least
12 days prior to the meeting". This change was overlooked in the overhaul of notice requirements done
following the 1995 Regulation Reform legislation. Staff recommends that the public notification time
period be amended to be 15 days prior to a meeting date to coincide with other public notification
requirements for development applications in the City which are 15 days in nearly all cases.
.
Justffication:
This will eliminate confusion and help standardize public notification procedures. There is no
specific need for extraordinary notification in the case of variances that is not required for
other land use actions. The notification period includes personal mailing, as with other
notifications.
While this change does not affect Planning Commission applications, the Planning
Commission, not the Board of Adjustment, is responsible for reviewing suggested amendments
to the Municipal Code as a whole, and therefore is the body which recommends the
amendment. As the notification process is administrative, the Board's normal functions will
not be affected by the amendment per the RCWs.
TITLE 17 (Zoning) - PORT ANGELES MUNICIPAL CODE:
Recommendation:
The new Forest Zone (FL) listing was inadvertently missed in the zone listings and explanation
Section 17.01 when the zone was adopted in 1995.
Justification:
This error was an oversight during the 1995 and 1999 amendments.
.
178
.
.
.
MeA 01-02
December 12,2001
Page 3
REZONE PROPOSALS:
Both the east City Hall and east County Courthouse parking areas along Peabody Street are zoned
improperly for their current uses. The City Hall parking area was zoned OC, Office Commercial,
some time ago to accommodate uses in what was the Rose House. The zoning was not changed
with the removal of the Rose House to another location and development of the area as additional
parking for City Hall. It is not known why the east County parking area was zoned RHD,
Residential High Density, but RHD is not an appropriate zone for the parking area. The County
administration has agreed that the portion of County property bordering Peabody Street, currently
developed as parking area, should be rezoned to PBP, Public Buildings and Parks.
The rezone would align the, property zones with current uses and with other properties used for
governmental activities.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments were received during the public comment period which ran from November
23,2001, through December 5, 2001.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW:
Growth Management Element
Policy (A)(1) and (g) Permits: Applications for both state and local government permits
should be processed in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability.
A(1). In all its actions and to the extent consistent with the provisions of this
comprehensive plan, the City shall strive to implement the following goals of the
State Growth Management Act:
g. Permits. Applications for both state and local government permits should be
processed in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability.
Land Use Element Map Goal, Policzes and Objectives
,
Goal A "To guide current and future development within the City in a manner that provides
certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the challenges and
opportunities ofthe future."
Policy No. 1 - "The Comprehensive Plan Land use map should be used as a conceptual
guide for determining current and long range zoning and other land use decisions. The map's land
use designations are intended to show areas where general land use types are allowed. The area
between land use designations should be considered an imprecise margin in order to provide
flexibility in determining the boundary of such areas. When determining appropriate zoning
designations for an area near a margin, the goals, policies and objectives of the Land Use Element
should take precedence."
179
MeA 01-02
December 12,2001
Page 4
Policy No.2. -"All land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council and/or any of
its appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with the Comprehensive .
Plan and its land use map."
Objective 1. - "The City will review and revise as necessary the existing Zoning Ordinance,
Zoning Map, and other development regulations to ensure consistency with the Comprehensive
Plan."
.
.
180
.
ATTACHMENT A
Findings and Conclusions In Support orPAMC Amendments MCA 01-02 :
Findings:
Based on the information provided in the Department of Community Development
Memorandum in support of Port Angeles Municipal Code Amendments MCA 01-01 dated
December 12, 2001, including all information in the public record file, comments and
testimony presented during the public hearings, the discussion and deliberation, the City of
Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. The applicant, City of Port Angeles, proposed Municipal Code Amendment to change
several sections of the Port Angeles Municipal Code, including Chapters 2.52 Board of
Adjustment, 15.04 Environmental Policy, and Title 17, Zoning.
2. The changes proposed to Chapter 2.52 Board of Adjustment are suggested for
compliance with current state laws, specifically R.C.W. 36.70.840, and would therefore
comply with other public notification time periods adopted by the City under the State's
Regulatory Reform Act.
.
3.
Changes proposed to Chapter 15.04 Environment are intended to streamline those
procedures dealing with acceptable development activities in critical areas of the City
such that exemptions permitted under WAC 197-11-980 are adopted by reference in
Section 15.04.040 - General Regulations.
4. Corrections are proposed throughout the Municipal Code which reflect that the
Planning Department and Building Division have been combined into the "Department
of Community Development". Therefore, references to "Planning Department" have
been changed to " Department of Community Development" and the reference to
"Planning Director" has been amended to read" Community Development Director".
5. Corrections are proposed to reflect that the "Planning Department" is now the
"Department of Community Development;" change the title "Planning Director" to
"Community Development Director;" "Public Works Director" to "Director of Public
Works and Utilities;" and "Building Inspector" to "Building Official".
6. Typographical corrections have been made to the titles "Home Occupations Conditional
Bse Permit", "Bed and Breakfast Conditional Use Permit", and Retail Stand Conditional
Bse Permit", to reflect the intended title of the chapters.
7.
The listing for Chapter 17.01 FL Forest Zone was added because it was inadvertently
left out ofthe Chapter 17.01 listings when adopted in 1995.
.
181
8.
Per Section 17.96.100 Amendments, any amendments adopted by the City Council may
be modified from the form in which they were advertised within the limits necessary to
relate properly such amendment or amendments to the Zoning Regulations. Final
action on such modifications shall be subject to review and report of the Planning
Commission prior to final passage by the City Council.
.
9. The City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map have been reviewed with respect to
the proposal.
10. The Port Angeles Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on December 12,
2001, for consideration of the proposed minor amendments. That meeting was
continued to February 13,2002, for further study. Following the February 13,2002,
continued public hearing, the Planning Commission forwarded a recommendation of
approval of the minor amendments to the City Council.
11. The City Council will consider the amendments at a public hearing on March 5, 2002.
Conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the Department of Community Development Staff Report
dated December 12, 2001 for MCA 01-02, including all information in the public record file,
comments and testimony presented during the public hearing, the Planning Commission .
discussion and deliberation, and the above listed findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning
Commission hereby concludes that:
1. The rezones as proposed are consistent with the goals and policies of the City I S
Comprehensive Plan including, but not limited to, Land Use Element Map Goal A,
and Policies A.l, and 2, and Objective A.l are pertinent to the rezone proposals.
2. The Municipal Code administrative amendments are consistent with the goals and
policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan including, but not limited to, Growth
Management Element Policy A(1), and Policy l(g).
3. The amendments will result in improved public service relating to permit processing and
regulation integration.
4. The proposed amendments are in the public use and interest.
.
182
.
.
.
Planning CommIssIOn Mmutes
December 12,2001
Page 12
PROPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTERS 2
(Board of Adjustment). 15 (Environment). 16 (8ubdhrisi6n}. and
17(Zoning) of the PORT ANGELES MUNICIPAL CODE: Proposed
amendments intended for clarification, correction, and streamlining of certain
procedures in the P AMC.
Planning Specialist Sue Roberds presented the Department's staff report recommending
specific administrative amendments to the Municipal Code including a rezone of the City's
and County's eastern parking lots to correspond with other government uses throughout the
City. Commissioners Schramm and Hewins indicated their preference to deal with the
rezone issue(s) separately and to follow the same process as for other applicants regarding
public notification of the action. The general consensus was that this issue should be
scheduled for an individual public hearing in January, 2002.
Community Development Director Brad Collins reviewed a second staff report from an
advisory committee that had been appointed this past spring to review the Municipal Code
for clarity. In the course ofthat review, the advisory committee raised other issues as well.
'"
The committee's suggested changes were outlined in the staff report.
Commissioner Hewins moved to continue the public hearing to February 13, 2002,
7 p.m. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Schramm and passed unanimously.
183
.
.
.
184
--------- --- -------------
'-~:::mm",'o, Mm.'" - F<hruory 13, 2002---)
Page 2 _ __ __..-----
---- -~--
---- ---CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
Chair Nutter indicated that those who testify must affirm that their testimony will be truthful
to the best of their knowledge.
PROPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTERS 2 (JJoard
of Adjustment), 15 (Environment). and 17(Zoning) of the PORT ANGELES
MUNICIPAL CODE- MCA 01-02: Proposed amendments intended for
clarification, correction, and streamlining of certain procedures in the P AMC.
(Continued from December 12, 2001.)
Assistant Planner Sue Roberds reviewed a brief memorandum with regard to the continued
public hearing. Chair Nutter reopened the continued public hearing. There being no public present
to testify, Chair Nutter closed the hearing.
Commissioner Hewins moved to recommend approval of Municipal Code Amendment
01-02 as proposed citing the following findings and conclusions:
Findings:
.
Based on the information provided in the Department of Community Development
Memorandum in support of Port Angeles Municipal Code Amendment MCA 01-02 dated
December 12, 2001, including all information in the public record file, comments and
testimony presented during the public hearing, the discussion and deliberation, the City of
Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. The applicant, City of Port Angeles, proposed Municipal Code Amendment to
change several sections ofthe Port Angeles Municipal Code, including Chapters 2.52
Board of Adjustment, 15.04 Environmental Policy, and Title 17, Zoning.
2. The changes proposed to Chapter 2.52 Board of Adjustment are suggested for
compliance with current state laws, specifically R.C.W. 36.70.840, and would
therefore comply with other public notification time periods adopted by the City
under the State's Regulatory Reform Act.
3. Changes proposed to Chapter 15.04 are intended to streamline those procedures
dealing with acceptable development activities in critical areas ofthe City such that
exemptions permitted under WAC 197-11-980 are adopted by reference in Section
15.04.040 - General Regulations.
4.
Corrections are proposed throughout the Municipal Code which reflect that the
Planning Department and Building Division have been combined into the
"Department of Community Development". Therefore, references to "Planning
Department" have been changed to " Department of Community Development" and
the reference to "Planning Director" has been amended to read " Community
Development Director". 185
.
Plannmg CommISSIOn Mmutes - February 13, 2002
Page 3
5.
Corrections are proposed to reflect that the "Planning Department" is now the
"Department of Community Development;" change the title "Planning Director" to
"Community Development Director;" "Public Works Director" to "Director of Public
Works and Utilities;" and "Building Inspector" to "Building Official".
6. Typographical corrections have been made to the titles "Home Occupations
Conditional Usc Permit", "Bed and Breakfast Conditional Usc Permit", and Retail
Stand Conditional Usc Permit", to reflect the intended title of the chapters.
7. The listing for Chapter 17.01 FL Forest Zone was added because it was inadvertently
left out of the Chapter 17.01 listings when adopted in 1995.
8. Per Section 17.96.100 Amendments, any amendments adopted by the City Council
may be modified from the form in which they were advertised within the limits
necessary to relate properly such amendment or amendments to the Zoning
Regulations. Final action on such modifications shall be subject to review and report
of the Planning Commission prior to final passage by the City Council.
9.
The City and County are jointly proposing a change in the Zoning Map to reflect the
public uses of the east parking areas, respectively, along Peabody Street.
Specifically, Lots 1 - 3 and 16 - 18 Block 67 TP A (City), and 1 - 3 and 17 - 20 Block
56, TP A (County). The properties are owned by government agencies and are
developed and function as government and public uses. It is proposed that the
designated zoning of the City's property be changed from OC, Office Commercial,
to PBP, Public Buildings and Parks, and the County from RHD, Residential High
Density, to PBP.
10. The City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map have been reviewed with respect
to the proposal.
11. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 12, 2001, which was
continued to February 13,2002, in consideration of proposed amendments to the Port
Angeles Municipal Code.
Conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the Department of Community Development Staff Report
dated December 12, 2001 for MCA 01-02 including all information in the public record file,
comments and testimony presented during the public hearing, the Planning Commission
discussion and deliberation, and the above listed findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning
Commission hereby concludes that:
1.
The Municipal Code administrative amendments are consistent with the goals and
policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan including, but not limited to, Growth
Management Element Policy A(1, B~ Policy l(g).
.
.
.
.
.
.
Plannmg CommiSSIOn Mmutes - February 13, 2002
Page 4
3.
The amendments will result in improved public service relating to permit processing and
regulation integration.
4. The proposed amendments are in the public use and interest.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Schramm and passed 6 - O.
187
.
.
.
188
.
~~ OR Tr'P;.N-G- E'LE"S'
1 ~; ':J~' l l' , j '( , I. 1 1_ l' ,
,: ,!!!Y e-J _ " ,I.~!~,_. _l: I ,,; ~J _I, j _,I~ "",V
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
CITY MANAGER'S CALENDAR / REPORT
March 5, 2002
Special City Council Meeting
Regular City Council Meeting
National League of Cities Conference - W A D.C.
City Council Meeting
Tuesday, March 5 4:00 p.m.
Tuesday, March 5 6:00 p.m.
Thurs Mar 7 - 12 Out-of-Office
Tuesday, March 12 3:00 p.m.
Wednesday, March 13 6;30 p.m.
Wednesday, March 13 7:00 p.m.
Thursday, March 14 11 :30 a.m.
Tuesday, March 19 6:00 p.m.
Thursday, March 21 7:00 p.m.
Monday, March 25 7;30 a.m.
Wednesday, March 27 7:00 p.m.
Utility Advisory Committee Meeting
Law Enforcement Advisory Committee Meeting
Planning Commission Meeting
Outstanding Public Service A ward Luncheon
Parks, Recreation, & Beautification Commission Meeting
Downtown Forward Executive Committee Meeting
Planning Commission Meeting
City Council Meeting
North Olympic Peninsula Mayor's Association Meeting
Gateway Committee Meeting
Utility Advisory Committee Meeting
Law Enforcement Advisory Committee Meeting
Tuesday, April 2 6:00 p.m.
Wednesday, April 3 6:00 p.m.
Thursday, April 4 8;15 a.m.
Tuesday, April 9 3:00 p.m.
Wednesday, April 10 6:30 p.m.
Wednesday, April 10 7:00 p.m.
Planning Commission Meeting
.NCLPKT\CTYMGR\CMREPT\2002\02-030S.WPd
189
.
.
.
190
.
.
.
CITY COUNCIL
GOALS - OBJECTIVES - PROGRAMS / PROJECTS
(Adopted ]2/]8/0]) Revised 2/5/02
2002 - OUR COMMUNITY WORKPLAN
PROJECT UPDATE - JANUARY/FEBRUARY
GOAL: FINANCIAL STABILITY
Provide consistent and quality municipal services through the adequacy, utilization, and
development of financial resources that maximize return on investment, leverage of outside
sources, and equity for local taxpayers.
P' / "':t:,,, ,,:, ' wl':P'" ,1;;:f g:;:' 't''''~; ,,;r~,( ,:'
~"n)gr~IDs ,,: ,roJ~c ~;g ~,,'~' 'I}
1.
Refinance and/or redevelop LID211 (Del Guzzi), along with other potential issues, to
improve finances and reduce long-term debt liability (****)
Northwestern Territories, an engineering and surveyingfirm, has been selected to
assist in the subdivision/development options for preliminary plat development. In
addition, staff has met twice with the adjacent neighbors for their input into the proposal.
The preliminary read is that the project would be favorably received since it is low-density
residential, protective of the sensitive envIronmental areas, and oriented toward low
impact development standards. Once the preliminary design is determined by the City, we
will submit it through the development review process.
Evaluate the financial system software and hardware proposals for operational
implementation (****)
Staff has conducted extensive analysis and review of the final proposals and has
included in your Council packet as part of the Information section, a review of the
recommendation to choose HTE as the preferred vendor. We are asking for your review
at this time with a proposed contract ready for the March 19th Council meeting.
Pursue outside funding sources/grants for capital projects like the Downtown Convention
Center, Downtown Parking, planning phase of the Pool Renovation, facilities such as the
Fine Arts Center and Marine Life Center, Lauridsen Boulevard bridge, 5th & Race
signalization, Ennis Creek bridge, non-motorized improvements, and the Carnegie Library
2.
3.
-1-
191
building renovation (***)
Funding has been secured for he 5th & Race St signalization. Construction will be
performed this summer. Federal/State funds are bezng pursued to replace the Sh Street
Bridges. We are also preparing a grant, in cooperation with the Historical Society, to the State
Heritage Resource Center for additional restoration and other improvements to the Carnegie
Library Building.
GOAL:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Promote communications, legislative influence, and agency cooperation with all public entities
on the North Olympic Peninsula, as well as State, Federal, and Tribal agencies which impact
our community and environment.
,Progr~ilfs,:jrr9j~~~s",,:
1.
Pursue Interlocal Agreements for Urban Services in the UGA with the County, PUD, Fire
District, and other service purveyors (*******)
Staff has met with County Administration to review the basic components for
revenue-shanng and the incorporation of City design standards into the UGA. Our next
step is to capture these ideas in a draft document for further review.
Coordinate and support Elwha mitigation efforts involving Elwha water protection
through agreements with the National Parks Service, Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, and
other agencies (***)
Negotiations continue with NPS and an agreement in principle is being discussed.
Obtain a 5-year renewal permit for landfill operations and continued execution of the
Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (***)
A one year permit has been issued to operate the landfill because the County
regulations do not permzt multiple years. The County has been requested to change their
regulations.
Continue agency cooperation on personnel, efficiency, shared resources, etc.
On February 13th Clallam Transit hosted the quarterly meeting of "Agencies
Working Together /I (AW1). This meeting is attended by the majority of public agencies
from the governmental and educational sectors of Clallam County. The purpose is to
share ideas and tangible assets where possible in the areas of personnel management and
training, equipment services, strategic planning, and information technology.
2.
3.
4.
-2-
192
.
.
.
.
.
.
GOAL: QUALITY MUNICIPAL SERVICES
Organize and provide municipal services that are oriented toward meeting the needs of our
citizens, effectively utilizing available resources, and achieving improvements ii, our
communi's uali 0 li e.
Programs / Projects
1. Develop Stormwater Management strategy and program with utility-type funding options
(******)
Public outreach meetings are being planned for the weeks of March ph and 18th.
The initial draft proposal has been developed as a fixed residential rate with a
commercial equivalent based upon impervious surface.
2. Revise the 5-year pavement management program and continue the chip seal and street
overlay program (****)
The program is planned to be brought to City Council on March 19th.
3. Complete the construction of the Black Diamond reservoir cover and install a new
disinfection system(***)
The construction is nearing completion and the reservoir 1S anticipated to return
to service during the month of March.
4. Implement a Co-composting Operations Plan to handle biosolids and yard waste (**)
Drainage improvements around the compost facility have been initiated. Permits
and capital improvements for starting the operation are being developed.
5. Replace the Spruce and McDougal Street Fire Pump Stations (**)
The process to select a consultant for design services has commenced. A
consultant agreement will be brought to the City Council within the next 30 to 45 days .
6. Clean the interior of the water reservoirs (**) - COMPLETE
7. Execute phase II and ill of the 300 gallon to 90 gallon conversion program for residential
refuse collection
Phase II distribution of 90 gallon containers will commence during March and be
completed by December.
8. Replace major portions of the concrete water main transmission service
The process to select a consultant for design services has commenced. A
consultant agreement will be brought to the City Council within the next 30 to 45 days.
9. Implement the Water Comprehensive Plan upon State Health Department's approval
Comments have been received from the Health Department and the issues
addressed. The plan is anticipated to be completed in May.
10. Obtain new NPDES permit for WWTP operations
The draft NPDES permit has been received from the Department of Ecology.
Draft comments have been returned and a public comment period will be held within the
next few months prior to issuance of the permit.
11. Explore the feasibility of a Reserve Police Officer Program
An RPO committee has been established to review this subject and has been
-3-
193
11.
meeting on a regular basis. Peninsula College has been requested to integrate the State
RPO academy curriculum znto its criminal justice program. The City is also pursuing
this program development independently with the establishment of polices and
procedures.
Replenish the armoring in cooperation with the Corps of Engineers on Ediz Hook to
protect the infrastructure
Work is scheduled to be accomplished by the Corps of Engineers in July.
GOAL: EMPLOYEE EXCELLENCE
Expand programs and policies that enhance the work environment, stimulate employee
performance, and promote customer service to assure the provision of quality municipal services
and prepare our employees for the future challenges in municipal government.
> _ " ""-4-", ~ ~ ,~~ '7 ~~ w mi-
Pr6gr~ms' lPr6I~~t~:;' ;::
1.
Continue Leadership Academy training courses and participation with outside agencies.
The executive group of City staff are scheduled for a "Business Ethics" course on
March 14th. In addition, they will also receive a "Performance Budgeting" course on 3/15.
Refocus the efforts of the Customer Commitment Steering Committee (Employee
Executive Committee).
This committee has been renamed to the Employee Executive Committee and is
focusing on (1) service as advisory and resources to the Incentives and Leadership
subcommittees,(2) assistance in the new Employee Suggestion Program, (3) management of
the budget for related employee development, and (4) other related issues.
2.
GOAL: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Develop policies and promote implementation measures that enact our Comprehensive Plan,
preserve the character of our community, and provide the necessary public facilities and
infrastructure consistent with our vision for the future.
-4-
194
.
.
.
.
.
.
~ '~<, > :}~ ~ ')~" < > 4 J>} 's~~ ~<~lf: '<tV ,1 i-~ ~t::~n
frgg[ams I ProJ,e,ct~ '7:~~~;;:;.:;;..
1. Implement the Telecommunications Plan for providing Fiber Optics (***)
Negotiations are underway and expected to be completed by May 31, with
Northland Communications to provide various services as requested by the City.
2. Complete the Carnegie Library improvement project and partner with the Historical Society
for museum operations (**)
Pre-final design is scheduled to be completed by March 18th with award of a
construction contract in early June.
3. Construct Laurel Street slope stabilization project (***)
Construction is planned to commence in early March.
4. Reactivate the Morse Creek Hydro Facility via lease with private sector and complete
environmental reviews (**)
The pipeline repair is complete. Negotiations with agencies has developed a
proposed new minimum flow levels in Morse Creek to protect endangered species.
5. Conduct a Pool Project feasibility study
A committee has been organized to look at design options for the functional
expansion of the facility within available space.
6. Prepare a "Domestic Terrorism Vulnerability & Threat Assessment" Plan of Operations and
risk assessment to our community.
The Police Department has obtained related guidelines from FEMA and from NLC
referencing this subject, and is under staff review.
7. Finalize the contract for the 8th Street Restoration Project
Work to complete the project will be accomplished when daytime temperatures are
consistently over 70 degrees fahrenheit.
8. Improve stormwater discharge at vicinity of Crown Park
Design and permitting by Zenovic and Assoc is underway. It is anticipated work
will commence this summer.
9. Construct a traffic signal at Fifth & Race
State funds have been secured and construction will commence this summer.
10. Construct the sidewalks along Front and First near Golf Course Road, "I" Street
Design has commenced. Construction is planned for this summer. Sidewalks are
also planned for Lauridsen Blvd between Jones and Liberty.
-5-
195
GOAL: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
.
Stimulate the community's economy through a combination of policies and programs which
diversify the economic base, support the community and resource-based activities, provide
adequate infrastructure and support, promote the opportunities for high technology and
innovative applications for our business and industrial base, and establish the community's
prominence as the service and activity center of the North Olympic Peninsula.
Programs / Projects
1.
Market Del Guzzi property and develop a business plan for use (****)
See progress under the Financial goal section.
Secure the site and construction for the Gateway Project (***)
The architects have conducted two community-wide planning and design workshops
to engage the public in their desIgn ideas. We are proceeding with a lid design to preserve
some parking in the area, and are working on the final design features.
Evaluate the Conference Center Proposals and establish a climate for a successful project.
City staff is continumg to facilitate progress with the preferred alternative during
this due diligence phase. A design workshop by the developer was scheduled for 2/28 to
receive public input. In addition, we have mcorporated the downtown design elements and
standards into design consideration. We are also considering an ALEA grant for
assistance in the related public waterfront improvements in the vicinity of the development.
Sappho Gap Project infrastructure developed with public/private participation.
Staff is continuing to monitor the progress by Qwest and Century Tell. The County
is considered a lead regulatory agency and we will assist in encouraging timely review.
Institute Small-Business Incubator Project
Funding applications have been submitted to the County Opportunity Fund with a
funding request of$1, 025, 000. In addition, the recent State capital budget includes a
preliminary funding request of $3M for the Skill Center as a related project of significance.
.
2.
3.
4.
5.
.
-6-
196
.
.
.
GOAL: COMMUNITY LIVABILITY
Protect, preserve and enhance the quality of living within our community which fosters a
commitment toward excellence in environmental, cultural, social, and physical benefits to our
citizens.
Programs / Projects
GOAL: COMMUNITY RELATIONS
Enhance citizen - government communication in order to promote a more responsive and
accountable municipal organization which functions with understanding and support for its
constituency.
Pr6g17a'irl~:,/Rr6~ e6f~' ,:~If~
,.~ 3 Y: ,~~'=" ~~-'Y'~J:. ~''-. c< 'J" '~m ::?" ~,
1. Incorporate performance measures into the annual budget process (****)
See the section for employee training.
2. Develop an ad-hoc committee concerning the feasibility of instituting Medic II citizen first
aid c1asses.(***)
The Medic II/First Aid Committee has met and decided to move forward
wzth such a class. Revisions to the Standard Operating Procedures have been drafted and
an mitial class schedule has been set. The first class will be in June.
3. Explore the feasibility of broadcasting City Council and other public meetings on Channel
21 (***)
Negotiations with Northland telecable ongoing and expected to be complete
by May 31. This issue will be addressed in these negotiations. In addition, the citizens
committee has been reorganized to review the operational policies and procedures
associated with any future potential for such action.
-7-
197
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
MARCH 5, 2002
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL ,/
k/
YVONNE ZIOMKOWSKJ, FINANCE DIREfT0{)lJ
Integrated Finance Systems v \
Summary: In the last eight months, the Finance Department, in cooperation with other City staff,
has been working on selection, acquisition, and implementation of a new integrated finance system.
After analysis and careful evaluation of all six proposals, the staff finds that the proposed HTE
system best meets the City's requirements for financial, operating, and hardware functions.
.
Recommendation: None at this time. For informational purposes only. However, the
recommendation for March 19 meeting will be to approve the contract with HTE.
Background / Analysis: One of the major goals for the year 2002 is the selection, acquisition, and
implementation of a comprehensive integrated finance system. In the fall of 2001, Requests for
Proposals (RFP) were sent to 27 vendors. Only six responses were received.
After a very detailed and careful evaluation, it is our consensus that the proposal received from HTE,
Inc. most closely meets the City's financial, operational, and hardware requirements. Additionally,
this company has been in the business for 20 years and has more than 2200 clients. The references
checked were very positive and customers seemed to be very satisfied with the software and the
company overall. It is also our understanding that the AS400 platform, in which the software resides,
is a very stable, reliable system.
For this project, $550,000 has been budgeted with an additional $50,000 reserved in the event an
additional module is necessary, help is needed during the conversion, or for follow-up training.
There were only two responses to the RFP which fell within the amount budgeted. The HTE price
was $421,687 exclusive of sales tax, conversion costs, and permitting and code enforcement
modules. They were the only vendor that included internet solutions in the proposed price. The
second response which fell within the budgeted amount was from a vendor who failed to meet many
of the requirements outlined in the RFP.
.
199
The Council Finance Committee met with the City Manager, the Finance Director, and Finance
staff members on February 22, 2002. Prior to that meeting, the Finance Committee was provided
with background information on the project, including a description of the selection process, and
some comparative data relatative to the six vendors and the components of their responses to the
RFP. Staff was available to answer questions and discuss the evaluation process and analysis that
were the foundation for the recommendation to select HTE. After review and discussion, the Finance
Committee members agreed with the staff recommendation.
.
Originally, the quotation provided by HTE expired on February 25,2002, however, the price has
been extended to the end of March. This means City Council will have to approve the contract at
its next meeting, which is March 19,2002.
In an effort to provide Council Members with information relating to the decision to acquire and
implement an HTE system, I have attached a detailed project overview, a description of the selection
process, and several appendices (including a memo from the Information Technology Manager
~e;~ati.ve t9 the\hardw~e)~~ue~,an9 cO,s,t ~n~~y~i~), . A,s a~way~Jwm 1;>e C\ttQ~ me~tiM t9 fiJJ,&wer YP~r
q~~jp~s aI}~,co~~~rl\S".;r'. ') =, :.' :'. ',", \:: " " l' I l ': ,; ',-, ;,,' ',' .~. \i 1'- r'j ,,,:l;',~ (~, ~i;I;' ; r;.:..: " ','1' ;"", ,', ,\:,\
~,,'ij~; ~,,:~-.~:) "~!r..(_: i'.,I'... :' l:d:~\i:~ (,:~ ~~, 1 ',rJl,_'.\.. 11'\...l_L_~:;~:";...' ~~.~'.:->;_...r tlt~J ~Ij- ti~i.. ~~~J.... 1l.~.~tl1 ~~ttl,_..~'~. "~Jd:
~"~'~J:\' ::..o~, l;...I';'l'l \: .~J::_' rC:'!~...'t:\'I_ (, t'~l, ~1\' -r}J-,~.. ~t:~\.. t;.v (l'~~l:\ "'~~~L~:-}~4.\ ,l;v~i ...:\;" :"(""'11(':1~~>.. 1'_' 't:.':
F~J ;' :.:l._~~~ / ::' t .':d'..1;-~~C ~,~, :1_1"\\ C'\~ i'-; l~: " ,!'\.. .~1\' i J' '-.. .:.~" U~~, :;:\ L~:{llf';\'>il n,"\lc...:. ( :~t:'.~ >~~~J;'1 (~;... ~~~d:
,t',.,:c\: ~i..~.: 1.~~~i.~:.:i'I",'~1 ~r'i 1,C;':l. ~~~Ct.",'~'qr,~::'.~~~~l; '~ t',) "\'':~l~l'': :-r~~"'. /\:ir'l :\:' '1,2.,\ ,~nd dj~ ':U~'''i'J;~.. t::.1.: ~':l:~t:I~.:t'
f~l'qitLqtc\: ~1\,:': ~: ".t'... ;~ .~(.~:lj \\'j;~i !L'," ....\;,~-: "~~(.d~(' '..~!' ~.:ljOd.
.. \,i\"~J;d::\'. rnl~ ,!:.,' :.,~" - ~':'\~'h),..-,.. l\';:l :'1 ~ i i- -.r-<r!.\{ r'r)} Ch;';;d!"" :5. ~)t:~I~.!~ "p("\t"':'~ ~h;"e :,.j_'~' b~~~.
.. ~':\.~,l ('\l"')'_~:""\~ L~l :'-- '">.(~ ~,,~ ~\~ :\.t:. ~ ,,;'" iil,:.~'- . '_-'1:\ {"t.tlr-~q \', ~~l ~Lt\:.~ :(\ ~i'.;..t}rd\IL t~~t~ 1..:~)!'iL'!,.-~ ~:t
.
;1" "~>,',f ':1...,,\,q1;t:::~" iJ~C!1,,'1 \':~~: 't', . " ."{,' i.1
; .' .' i. ' J l - . :, I -; >'/l t ',' 1 :~.':. { '\ ~ 1):' v; ~~,. '_ :"" -. ~ '\..~ t ''''l ''-' ~ 1 :''- l \: : "; . I " : f, ~ I' t: , -, '- ~ '., f !' ~ ...... ""..... j ,,! ); t I (, .. J': C , : [ .' ~ I ~ ~I i..'
~,;>:>'(~.:r,l:~I l;'~:"::,:l';lt ~,~:~.'~ l~j.A"I..~l>:.,~...'t""
" ~ - ~ ,
I 1.,C I t' ,_....i\\t~':f,~I~~...'\' '::~'Yl.'=')l~/ \<~\-< \".",.._(..',';"
:~r,'. ~"'~ 'l;1\ .....-~cr~:; '1~~Pn- ~..~.-... ;:!t\.t :': '_, 'j ;' l~') :',1'" ll;l, Pi>, _11.1:, ,', .r.~.;t';~}!l\'\ ]\LIJI.::.~I...~r
i~1~~lrY'::J,l~~.:~1~ !~::\;.J~< ...:t; ....\....;h.~ (t~Pt: J-,~l:'! ~\r~~~jl':.';i ,\. ',~"'~~~\~;r.'j""~..; l\~l; irrtt ,t'4\.t~2t.~ :-~;::...~:J{~~;\t.:)~~p\I.,\r~r;~u'z}
..:1:-=;\\'",:; 1 f-:iJ;f~L'.""-ll"';,':.~');j;~t',,
, ": ~ t" t! \ ,
, _ . ,),"
i ~ ~, " \'
, II,
\ \, 'i' ,J,_
, ,
r
: 1- "
~',.' -~r '.~~
~.~ : ,I ." I
\,.... ' <"
.--', '
}'.,' 1
I , ~ ~ I
~ "( . , ~
~, ~. -
,
"
~ I (~...
, , ~. ,
'., "
, "
"
,_ _\, L'
',' 1
'\ ~ ~'~. :"-','
it.
;1, '
. ~ ; I ~; l'
,J,',
'!,
i',
~. "': J 1
, "
-~ ,-"
"
. >- "...
I ,..
, "
::-(-
":. , ~ I
l ~ '
"
,\, I }
, '.\.
. :
'. '
. ~ I. ,- \ ...
IT, , -.
\;
~. !'.
, "
" ,I
.
~ ~ .
,<
~" ,
, : ."
. , , .1
~,. I ~ ::. ~ . ... ~". " ' ~ l '-~; ,>' ': ,"
r~' ;\ ;~~'\~' ~ ';"',,-
'l.r~" ," :;:'; :e~~ ~ ~ .... ,~,...", ':-..1....~,.1_' ~~'<;" ,,' ,..:' ,I
','--. " > .'~~. [.I~~-: \~'.,,~_,:
,200 '
.
.
.
OVERVIEW:
For approximately the last eight months, the Finance Department has been working on a project
aimed at acquisition and implementation of new integrated financial system for the City of Port
Angeles.
The current system was installed in 1991 and, although it is adequate in many respects, there has
been growing dissatisfaction with its performance over the las,t couple of years, as the City has
attempted to produce financial information which is more complex, more useful to management .
and provides better and more responsive tools for serving the public -
The,precipitating event in our decision to explore replacing the software was a notification from
our current vendor, in early 2001, that they would discontinue support of the existing utility
billing function In order to continue using their product, we would need to move our billing
operations to their newest billing upgrade. The cost associated with this upgrade was somewhere
in the neighborhood of a quarter of a million dollars and there would be additional ongoing, per-
customer-account maintenance fees of $1 00 per account. Given the magnitude of these charges,
we felt it was prudent to consider the feasibility of replacing the entire system and to look at what
current financial software was available on the market to meet our growing needs
In July 2001, during the investigative process described below, we received a second notification
from Cayenta, our current vendor, announcing that any support for the existing software would
be discontinued as of July 1, 2003 Aside from the inherent..instability of running unsupported
software, we would,be unable to comply with any federal or state mandated changes to items such,
as 1099's, W2's, and retirement programs.
The fundamental questions we attempted to address during the process, with a brief description of
our conclusions to date are as follows.
1. Should we replace the software?
We have concluded that the software should be replaced. Even if we stay with
our current vendor, we would be required to get "new" software in the form of
their latest version, at substantial cost. Furthermore, we discovered considerable
advances in functionality and efficiency in the newer products, which we believe
would enhance our performance and alleviate some of executive management's
dissatisfaction with their ability to get information and reports they require.
2.
What would be the cost?
The analysis of responses to the RFP revealed a wide range of answers to this
question. The highest estimate provided was close to $800,000 and the lowest
was a little over $260,000. A detailed presentation of the vendor responses can be
found in Appendix F.
201
3
What would be the benefits?
We have been very excited by the possibilities we have seen in these software
packages. Aside from the increased financial capabilities previously mentioned,
there have been significant advances in technology since 1991 which lend
themselves to enhanced management information and customer service
applications. Included in most are streamlined budgeting modules, integration with
GIS, e-commerce capabilities, user-friendly reporting and inquiry tools for
analytical purposes, enormous integration potential to eliminate duplicate work
and/or inconsistencies across departmental lines. The glaring benefit, obviously, is
the safeguard and reliability of having a fully supported software application on
line.
4
What would be the target implementation date?
January 1,2003. We believe it is in the best interest of our department and the
City as a whole to implement for the next fiscal year. Our current utility billing
function ceases to be supported at the end of 2002 and all the other modules will
be discontinued in the middle of 2003. Continuing piecemeal module by module
creates enormous integration problems. Delaying beyond the natural date
boundaries of the City's fiscal year (January 1 - December 31) results in a year
when the City's financial records would be on two sets of books and possibly in
two different formats Although this target date presents an aggressive
implementation schedule, we would plan to have the core financial operations up
and running for next year It may be necessary to implement some of the newer or
less critical tasks beyond this date. We will work with the vendor installation team
to develop an implementation and training schedule.
There are a couple of issues related to strategy and approach that are worth mentioning. First of
all, we attempted to assure that everyone who used the system or had use for the information
provided by the system had a part in the evaluation and selection process We felt it was
extremely important for everyone from the accounting department staff who process transactions,
to executive management who look for informative reports and analysis, to be involved. We speak
of integrated financial systems, and we attempted to achieve an integrated evaluation process,
including various levels of users and cross-departmental participation.
Secondly, we approached the project from a software-functionality perspective. We requested
hardware information in the RFP in order to take a "total solutions" look at the proposals and to
have a framework under which to consider costs, but the emphasis has been on quality and
integrity of financial applications offered by each vendor Each vendor proposes/recommends
different hardware configuration for their product and a review of their responses was certainly an
integral part of our consideration (see Appendices D & E) However, we felt it would be putting
the cart before the horse to identify a particular hardware configuration and then attempt to find
software to conform to the limitations of whatever we selected.
.
.
Thirdly, we decided at the beginning to make this an open process. We invited the County to .
review the RFI and RFP documents and to attend any vendor demonstrations held at City Hall In
202
.
.
.
addition, the we invited other cities to join us during these demonstrations, and both the City of
Poulsbo and the City of Bainbridge Island participated We believe this was an extremely
beneficial decision, as it broadened the range of questions to which the vendors had to respond.
We would be happy to answer any questions you may have about the process, our conclusions,
or our plans
SELECTION PROCESS:
. On June 18, 2001 the City published a Request for Information (RFI) for an integrated
financial software and related hardware system. The RFI document was used to see what
software was available to meet the City's business needs and what the approximate cost
would be
. At the end of July, we received responses to the RFI from the following vendors: Cayenta,
Inc, Eden Systems, HTE, Inc., Munis, New World Systems, SCI Government
e-Management Solutions, Inc., and Springbrook Software.
.
The RFI responses were evaluated by the Finance Director, Accounting Manager and
Finance Systems Specialist. Our main focus was to find a vendor that could provide a
complete system solution that was fully integrated with flexible report writing capabilities
as well as consideration for future growth
. Due to the fact that our financial software was no longer going to be supported, work
began on a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a new integrated financial software and related
hardware system. The RFP is a very detailed list of specific requirements that the city
needed for both hardware and financial software.
. Teams from a cross section of city employees were formed to work on the individual
subsystem sections of the RFP These teams were also involved in the evaluation of the
responses to the RFP A kick off meeting for the process was held on August 23, 200l.
The teams that were formed included' Utility Billing, Accounts Receivable, Cash
Collections, Job CostlEquipment/Inventory, PayrolllHuman Resources, General
LedgerlBudgeting, Accounts PayablelPurchase Orders, Fixed Assets, Business Licenses,
Permitting, and Information Technologies.
. An executive committee was also formed to review the RFP responses and determine the
best vendor to meet the city's requirements This executive committee comprised of the
following people: Mike Quinn, Yvonne Ziomkowski, Linda Kheriaty, Craig Knutson,
Glenn Cutler, Dan McKeen, Marc Connelly, Brad Collins, Tanya O'Neill, and Jim Harper.
.
Based on the responses to the RFI, Eden Systems, HTE, Inc., New World Systems, and
Cayenta, Inc. were invited to city hall to demonstrate there software in September and
October. New World Systems canceled their demonstration, but the other companies
203
spent a full day demonstrating their software City employees were able to ask questions
of the vendors and see the actual products that were available .
. Work on the RFP document by the various committees was completed and the RFP was
published on October 4,2001. The RFP was sent to 27 companies and was required to be
responded to by November 16,2001
. There were six responses received from the RFP. The companies that responded
included: Avenir Systems, Caselle, Inc , Cayenta, Inc., Eden Systems, HTE, Inc , and New
W orId Systems.
. The subsystem committees and the executive committee members were given copies of
the responses and evaluations forms in order to rank their choice of vendors. Each
subsystem committee ranked the vendors on items such as: how closely the software fit
their individual subsystem requirements, reporting needs, inquiry needs and data
accessability needs (see Appendix C). The subsystem committees were also asked to list
specific items that they thought were beneficial or not beneficial about the software as it
related to city operations.
.
The executive committee met on December 12, 2001 and reviewed the subsystem
committees evaluation forms and the additional information requested in the RFP and
came to the decision to complete a more detailed review of the following vendors: Avenir
Systems, Eden Systems, and HTE, Inc.
.
. Avenir Systems answered yes to almost everything that we had asked for in the RFP. The
general consensus amongst the subsystem committees was that they were "to good to be
true" Since we had not seen A venir Systems in our demonstrations from the RFI process,
we invited them to demonstrate their software on January 22, 2001. Based on the
demonstration we found that Avenir Systems was not going to meet our needs. Several
subsystems were still in the development stages and the company itself was created in the
year 2000. We decided to focus our efforts on the other more established software
vendors.
. Eden Systems only has one electric utility customer Software to bill electric utilities can
be very complex Our Information Technologies committee also had some concerns that
Eden did not fully complete the hardware and operating software portion of the RFP.
After discussing this with the executive committee, it was decided to move forward with
both candidates; however, focus our evaluation on HTE.
.
Throughout the months of January and February we have been calling references of
HTE's. We have found the overall consensus is that their customers are very satisfied
with the software and the company We have also heard very good responses to the user
group training sessions. We heard from every customer that the AS400 platform in
which the software resides is a very stable, reliable system.
.
204
.
.
On January 28, 2002 we had HTE back for a full day of demonstrations on their utility
billing software The subsystem committee for utility billing and cash collections was
satisfied that the product would meet our needs
. On February 7,2002 a group of 11 city employees traveled to the Cities of Olympia and
Lacey to see the HTE software in use and talk with other city employees about the
software. Although neither of these sites have installed the newest Java Line version of
HTE software, the site visit gave us an insight of how the software can be utilized. Both
Olympia and Lacey seemed to be very satisfied with the software and the company overall.
. On February 12, 2002 HTE came back to city hall to give a more detailed demonstration
of their work orders, job cost, general ledger and budgeting systems
At the conclusion of this process, we have recommended acquisition ofHTE's system for the
City of Port Angeles We believe they are a good company with a good product and good
support and customer relations The only significant reservation we had was that the system's
account structure was inadequate and inflexible in accommodating the statutory reporting
requirements of the Washington State Budgetary Accounting Reporting System. Customers
in other states have also expressed a need for modification of the account structure to provide
more flexibility in reporting. HTE has agreed to make the modifications necessary to allow us to
structure our chart of accounts in conformance with BARS, at no additional cost, and have the
. revision available during the last quarter of 2003.
HTE, Inc. has given us substantial discounts on their license fees. The RFP price expires on
February 25,2002 We have asked HTE to extend the price; however, they would like a contract
signed by the end of March in order to extend their discounts This project has been moving at a
very fast pace due to the fact that the city would like to be using the new software for the fiscal
year beginning January 1, 2003.
.
205
LIST OF APPENDICES .
Company Profiles
. Appendix A:
A summary overview of each vendor
. Appendix B' Vendor Services Summary
Summary descriptions of each proposed software solution,
including some brief technical and documentation information,
maintenance and support data, conversion capabilities, and a list of
base modules for each system
. Appendix C: Ranking
Vendor ranking by module resulting from committee work done
during the evaluation process.
. Appendix D: Hardware and Operating System Summary
Technical data
. Appendix E: Information Services Analysis Memo
A memo from Tanya O'Neill, Information Technology Manager
. Appendix F: Cost Analysis
A cost comparison by vendor, by system component and in total .
.
206
RFP for Integrated Financial Software and Related Hardware
Company Profile
Appendix A
February 15, 2002 02:28pm)
Avenir Caselle Cayenta Eden HTE New World
Headquarters Bend, OR Spanish Fork, UT San Diego, CA Seattle, W A Lake Mary, FL Troy, MI
Contact Andy Parks 1.800.228.9851 Angus Beaton Mike Boots Dan Conway Cliff Coulter
1.541.322.2041 604.570.4317 509.962.5475 1.800.727.8088 x5170 505.275.6420
andvo@>.avenir- abeaton@caventa.co dconway@hteinc.com
svstems.com m
Nearest office location Bend, OR Spanish Fork, UT Burnaby, BC Canada Tukwila, W A Bainbridge Island Albuquerque, NM
How many years in 1 yr+ 20 17 21 20 20
business
How many 200+ 600+ 78 250 2200 500+ ......
software/hardware 0
installations N
How many data 100+ 600+ 5 Financials 250+ 150 per quarter 10 to 15 per year
conversions completed 21 Utilities
Percentage of successful 100% 98% 100% 95% 90% or higher 95%
data conversions without
re-entry
Do you offer toll-free Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes yes
support numbers
Hours support is available 5:30 - 5:30 PST 8:00 - 5:00 MST 6:00 - 5:00 PST 5:00 - 5:00 PST 24 x 7 5:00 - 5:00 PST
Do you offer dial-in Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
diagnostics
Do you offer support via Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes yes
the Internet
.
.
.
Avenir Caselle Cay a Eden HTE Ne arId
List any established user Newly Fonned Annual Conference 5 User groups. One in Washington State user HUG national group Annual Meeting,
groups associated with your the Pacific Northwest group also Western group regional user groups
software.
Staffing:
Management 3 8 16 8 92 15
Marketing 2 5 8 3 38 12
Programmers, Systems 10 10 37 15 118 60
Analysts
Customer Support 8 23 9 40 210 45
(including training)
Other 7 9 13 10 158 68
Total 30 55 119 76 524 200
Any pending litigation No No Yes No No No
If yes, explain. N/A N/A Currently in payment N/A N/A N/A CO
dispute with a 0
('.I
customer.
Ownership structure Limited Liability Corporation Corporation Corporation Corporation Corporation
Corporation
References Company Profile pg 5 Proposal page 5 Section 2 Page 14 Section 2 Section 2 Page 5 Section 2 page 1-4
Additional Comments Only 2 WA Quandrant Systems
customers, off site for cashiering. Ron
training only Turley Associates for
Fleet Management.
Sympro - investments
e-technology One client using - No e-technology No e-technology Permits in Beta. Click2Gov for Netto.gov includes
appears to still be ill provided. They use currently Currently developing utilities, permits, utilities. Additional
development stages third party utilities, business business license, modules scbeduled
Spectre licenses, Accounts planning and zoning. for future release.
Enterprises,Inc receivable and payroll Section 6
RFP Expiration 4/5/02 2/25/02 2/12/02
2
RFP for Integrated Financial Software and Related Hardware
Vendor Services Summary
Appendix B
February 15,2002 02:28pm)
A venir Caselle Cayenta Eden HTE New World
How may the application Lease or Purchase Purchase only Purchase Only Lease or Purchase Lease or Purchase Lease or Purchase
software be acquired
Who has ownership of the Customer Caselle Cayenta Eden Systems HTE New World Systems
software packages
Who owns the source code A venir Systems Caselle Cayenta Canada Eden Systems HTE New World Systems
Is the source code available No Held in escrow. $200 Not for purchase. Available by request Yes at no cost Yes at a cost of 10%
for purchase and what are per year to be on the Available via escrow at no charge of license fee
the requirements and costs escrow list agent
to obtain
Who authored the software Avenir, Orcom, Brio Caselle Cayenta Eden Systems HTE, Inc. New World Systems
packages Software, Awbrey
Solutions ~
What programming Java, XML, RPG, C, Visual Basic Cobol, Uniface, Java, Delphi RPG II & RPG IV RPG N
language are the packages RPGIII C++
written in
Are the software packages Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
database driven
If yes, using wluch Universal DB2 and Acess 2002 Release Oracle 8i Database independent OS/DB2 Universal database
database SQL in SQL can use Microsoft DB2
SQL, Oracle or
Informix
May the customer offer the Yes Yes if connected to No Yes with limits No No
software packages as a the city
service to outside users of
this system
.
.
.
A venir Caselle Caye Eden HTE N~rld
How often is the software Some quarterly, some Annually MM - one mandatory Every 3 to 6 months Generally 1 yr. HTE 1 to 2 times per year
updated annually per year-fixes weekly provides service to
UM every 2 years update for customers
How are software updates Secure web site CD's On-line Electronically or Tape, e-mail, CDrom CD or magnetic
distributed to clients and/or mail CDROM media
What is your Generally 24 hrs Immediate Based on priority Response time Goal 24 hrs Immediate call back.
maintenance/technical level. Call back averages under 2 hrs Fix times vary
support turnaround time for within 1 business hr
patches or fixes to crittcal
software failures
Is the maintenance of the A venir Caselle Cayenta Eden HTE New World Systems
software preformed by the
vendor or an external
SO).lfce
IndIcate the applicable
rates for software
modification and
development: 0
-
Programmer $75 - $ 150/hr I $125/hr $ 175/hr $ 150/hr $ 125/hr $1l0/hr N
Developer $125- $150/hr $125/hr $175/hr $lSO/hr $12S/hr $1l0/hr
Do you charge for changes Generally No No No No Yes No
required by state and/or
federal regulations
Is this service available Avenir Caselle Cayenta Eden HTE New World Systems
from the vendor or from an
external source
If the vendor uses an N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
external source for the
above services, identify
that source and where that
source is located
2
-
A venir Caselle Cayenta Eden HTE New World
Are the services readily Varies Critical items given Varies depending on Readily available lead Varies on size of N/A
available or what IS the immediate attention scope of work time may be required modification
lead time required to
schedule these services
Additional Comments:
Is a hardware maintenance No No Yes 1'1 year only No Yes Yes
agreement required
Time and Material Rates $285/hr for ffiM $95/hr 2 hr minimum N/A $150/hr N/A N/A
$200/hr for A venir $100 trip charge
Available T & M service 8.00 - 5:00 PST 8:00 - 5:00 PST N/A 5:00 - 5:00 PST N/A N/A
hours
Under the maintenance
agreement, is:
Mamtenance support Yes - ffiM No Yes - ffiM No Yes ffiM service Yes ffiM service
contracted to an external
party
r
Preventative maintenance Yes Yes No No Yes Yes -
included <:'II
How often is PM Annually on servers N/A As needed When potential
performed failure trend is
identified
Remedial maintenance No No No Yes Yes
included
Customer SIte located Extended Regular Regular Regular Regular Regular
within the vendors regular
or extended area of service
If extended, what is the $200/hr plus travel N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
addItional cost expenses
Response time guaranteed Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
.
.
.
A venir Caselle Caye Eden HTE Ne orld
If yes, what is the response Initial contact within 8 business hrs 4 hours 4 hrs 24 hrs
time 4 hours
Is faster response time Various support plans No Can be negotiated
available for an additional available with ffiM
fee? If so, describe.
Maintenance office Seattle Seattle Port Angeles Seattle
location
Number of:
Local service technicians 6 2 unknown 2 20+
Local customer sites unknown N/A 100+
Additional Comments Questions were not HTE has separate
. .. answered related to company just for
: ., ." ... ~ ll', ., . hardware hardware, os software,
network support.
Section 2 pg 3
\,~
Operating System (OS) -
Software Support: N
Is OS software support Yes Yes Yes Yes with limits Yes Yes
provided
If no, is OS support Yes $222/month N/A N/A N/A N/A
available from a thud party
Please indicate the source ffiM N/A N/A N/A N/A
of the third party support
Additional Comments:
Warranty period:
Hardware 1 yr 3 yr from Negotiated with Depends lyr 1 yr
manufacturer Hardware contract
Operating System Software Included in Hardware N/A Covered by support & Depends 1 yr 1 yr
maintenance contract
4
A venir Caselle Cayenta Eden HTE New World
Packaged Software 90 days 1 yr 1 yr Lifetime Warranty 90 days 90 days
Custom Software 90 days N/A Covered by support & Lifetime Warranty No
maintenance contract
Is support available after Yes Yes Yes Yes - Software has Yes Yes
the warranty period for lifetime warranty
packaged and custom
software expires
If yes, how is this service Annually Quarterly Annually N/A Hardware- quarterly Annually
billed OS software- annually
Additional Comments:
Data Conversion
Requirements:
ConversIOn Available Yes Yes Yes only necessary Yes Yes Yes
for VB to UM
Partial Conversion Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Available ~
-
Are conversions module Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes per customer Yes ('III
based needs
Estimated timetable per Hours not supplied Hours not supplied
module:
General Ledger Not Required 50 hrs 100 hrs 20 hrs
Budget Tracking and Not Required o hrs Included in GL 20 hrs
Preparation
Accounts Receivable Not Required 32 hrs 60 hrs 20 hrs
Accounts Payable Not Required 14 hrs Included in GL 20 hrs
Purchasing Not Required o hrs 80 hrs 20 hrs
Cash Not Required o hrs 20 hrs 20 hrs
ReceiptinglManagement
.
.
.
,
Avenir Caselle Cayenta Eden lITE New rid
Investment Management N/A 40 hrs Included in GL 20 hrs
Payroll/Human Resources Not Required 120 hrs 40 hrs 20 hrs
Loan Management N/A o hrs To be determined 20 hrs
Business Licenses N/A 32 hrs 80 hrs 20 hrs
Job/Project Costing Not ReqUIred 88 hrs 80 hrs 20 hrs
Work Order Not Required 27 hrs 80 hrs 20 hrs
Equipment Management Not Required 27 hrs Included in 20 hrs
purchasing
Inventory Not Required 27 hrs Included in 20 hrs
purchasmg
Fixed Asset , Not Required ' 32 hrs 20 hrs 20 hrs
Grant Not Required o hrs To be determined 20 hrs
Tracking/Management
Permits N/A 88 hrs 96 hrs 20 hrs 'lIl:t
,....
\.~
UtIlity BIllIng Approximately 60 80 hrs 120 hrs 40 hrs
days
System OperatIOns Not Required o hrs Need more info 20 hrs
Baseline percentage of non- 95% 98% Small amount of 95% 90% 90+%
reentry certified data reentry
converted by module
Is conversioh performed Both Offsite Majority offsite Offsite Both, but always on Onsite
onslte or off site some onsite customers machine
Live data security All data protected Utmost precautions Yes Strict confidentiality iSeries Folder
procedures offered policy Security
Media & format required CD's, tapes CD's, FTP, Discs ASCII Generally nat ASCII Tape, disk, ASCII
for lIve data file format
6
A venir Caselle Cayenta Eden HTE New World
Data testing strategy Balance to value and Data balanced to Integrated testing HTE and customer Separate test library
month end reports penny phase perform acceptance
testmg
Timetable for parallel Determined during Very limited Two weeks Varies Through a month-end 30 days per major
processmg project scope application
Known transferrable data ASCII, Flat file, DB2, ASCII, Access, text All data from our ASCII Yes ASCII
areas/formats/types CSV tables files current system
Known non-transferrable None Only active meters Yes PICK SCI
data areas/formats/types converted. Only NR
with open balances.
No future collection
events converted
Additional comments: All training done
off site in Utah
Hardware and Operating
Systems Software. Are
detailed documentation It)
manuals available for: -
'-"I
Hardware Yes - Online Yes Yes Yes online and CD Yes
Computer Operations Yes - Online Yes Yes Yes online and CD Yes
Operating Systems Yes - Online No Yes Yes online and CD Yes
Systems Utilities Yes - Online No Yes Yes online and CD Yes
Systems Database Yes - Online No Yes Yes online and CD Yes
Programming Languages Yes - Online No Yes Yes online and CD Yes
Are updates provided for Yes - Online No Yes Yes at no cost
documentation
Application Software. Are
detailed documentation
manuals available for:
Systems Design No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
.
.
.
A venir Caselle Eden HTE Ne
Programs No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Computer Operations Yes -Training $200/hr Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
User Operations Yes -Training $100/hr Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Systems and User Training Yes -Training $100/hr Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Who owns the application Customer Caselle Cayenta Eden HTE as part of New World Systems
software documentation licensed software
Additional Comments
8
..0
...-
N
Appendix C
Ranking
. RFP for Integrated Financial Software and Related Hardware
Factor Avenir Caselle Cayenta Eden HTE New World
General Ledger 5 231 214 259.5 246 219.5 165
Budget Tracking and PreparatIon 4 184 153.2 1844 210 188.8 155.6
Accounts Receivable 4 192 72 196 200 192 132
Accounts Payable 4 174 134 206 196 206 188
Purchasing 2 98 74 94 108 104 102
Cash Receiptmg/Management 4 120 808 152 152 202.4 126.4
Investment Management 1 4 0 0 45 14 0
Payroll 5 300 245 280 255 255 225
Human Resources 3 114 66 147 156 126 60
Loan Management 1 60 42 0 60 42 0
Business Licenses 2 0 0 0 78 110 0
Job/Project Costing 4 1524 132 190 170.8 170.4 108
Work Order 4 134 20 199.6 182.8 185.6 1344
Equipment Management 4 182.8 0 1888 184 144 145.6
Inventory 4 164 156.8 184.8 179.2 176 150
Fixed Assets 2 90 70 92 96 86 66
Grant Tracking/Management 1 0 36 0 60 48 48
Permits 2 0 0 0 96 78 38
Utility Billing 5 75 120 200 140 230 140
.tern OperatIons 5 170 85 165 80 235 65
Total Points 2445.2 1700.8 2739.1 2894.8 3012.7 2049
.
217
.
.
.
218
RFP for Integrated Financial Software and Related Hardware
Hardware and Operating System Summery
APPENDIX D
Avenir
E/CASSETTE STORAGE
el
e Storage (Y/N)
sette Storage (Y/N)
Intlty of Each Type
laclty Proposed (MB)
laclty Maximum (MB)
npressed Data (Y/N)
lSlty (BPI)
led (IPS)
nsfer rate (KB/s)
Je Type
',' '-
IBM MOL. 4586 25 GB OIC
YES
NO
1
not InC
not InC
not Inc
not Inc
not InC
2 - 4 MB/s
OIC MLR3
unknown
Cost of Tape/Cassette Storage
/RW STORAGE
del
antlty
paclty Proposed (MB)
paclty Maximum (MB)
nSlty (BRI)
,eed (IPS)
3nsfer rate (KB/s)
-flection rate If greater than 65%
lpable of Universal DIsc Format (UDF)
Icket writing or cache
Jffer Size
Ikebox or Stacker Style
ternal/External Configuration
IBM MOL 4530 DVD-RAM
1
notlnc
notlnc
not Inc
notlnc
notlnc
not inC.
notlnc
not Inc
notlnc
not inc
INTERNAL
unknown
Cost of CD/RW Storage
'ORKST A nONS
odel
uantlty
rocessor Type
AM Memory
creen Size
lumber of Colors ReqUired
:esolutlon Required
:efresh Freq Recommended
en Key Pad (Y/N)
unction Keys (Y/N)
letachable Keyboard (Y/N)
~ouse Type
;upported I/O Devices
IBM Info Window II 3486
not Inc
notlnc
not Inc
not Inc.
not Inc
800 x 600
notlnC
YES
YES
YES
N/A
not inc
not Inc.
Cost of Workstations
Caselle
,;;' ~ , 7/ '-to . ' '
unknown
YES
NO
1
20GB un/40GB com
not Inc.
YES
notlnc
not InC
not Inc
OAT
Inc In server price
, ,1,
not inc.
not Inc
not mc
not InC
not InC
not Inc
not inc.
not Inc
notlnc
notlnc
not InC
INTERNAL
inc In server pnce
"
, j '.,\ L " ~ '
J 1~\ ,
Pili 500 Mhz
20
PIli 500 Mhz
128 MB
17 Inch
256
800 x 600
not InC
not Inc
not InC
not InC
YES
not InC
1,350
27,000
Cayenta Eden
,I "/\,<,',~7~/'~'t\ ~'I~' ~-' } ~'I:(,;"'~l:"A~'
IBM 3580 Ultnum
YES
NO
1
200 GB
200 GB
not Inc.
N/A
30 MB/s
30 MB/s
IBM Ultnum Cartndge
unknown
not Inc
1
4GB
4GB
N/A
40X
16/4/40 KB/s
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
INTERNAL
Unknown
I' , ,; \~;I' ',' J
not Inc
not Inc.
notlnc
not inc.
17 Inch
not inC.
1024 x 768
72 Mhz
YES
YES
YES
PS2, Senal, USB
ptrs/scanicash drws
not inC.
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknowh
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
_ r..': '~f~' I ::: l~ ;: ( ;;
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
HTE
',-,'" .'
., ,I' I
unknown
YES
NO
1
50GB
not inc
not Inc
not Inc
not Inc
2 MB/s
Ouarter Inch Cart
inc In server pnce
CD-ROM
1
not Inc
not Inc
not InC
not inc
not Inc
not inc
not tnc
not inc
not InC
not inC.
INTERNAL
inc in server price
l ,~,
L~ J ~. '
IBM 3487 console
1
not inC.
not Inc
17 Inch
256
not Inc
not Inc
YES
YES
NO
N/A
Printers
inc In server price
New World
unknown
YES
NO
not inc
1600
3200
YES
N/A
N/A
1.5 MB/s
1/4 In Cartndge
unknown
N/A
not InC
not Inc
not Inc
not Inc
not InC
not Inc
not InC
notlnc
not Inc
not Inc.
not Inc
not Inc
N/A
0.
..-
N
Not Proposed
..
I
I '
RFP far In;egrated Financial Sattw'-nd Related Hardware
Hardware and Operating System Summery
APPENDIX D
.
Avenir Case lie Cayenta Eden HTE New World
INTENANCE ~.II __..._ -. - -- ~"_ _..4. _liWi'IlI!l!i1I:
ldor provided Hardware Proposal (Y/N) YES YES YES NO YES YES
ldor provided Hardware Specifications (Y/N) YES YES YES YES (outdated) YES YES
ldor provided Hardware Pnclng (Y/N) YES YES YES YES YES YES
ldor provides Purc /Setup/lnstallatton Support YES NO YES NO YES YES
ldor Provides Operatlonal/Malnt Support (Y/N) YES & NO YES NO YES (limited) YES & NO NO
If NO then who does? AVENIR OR IBM 1/1/1/ IBM not inC. IBM IBM
der Maintenance Agreement the follOWing IS, I'. ' , ,~;.i. "
" '
Preventative Maintenance Included (Y/N) YES YES NO, neg w/lBM not inC. YES YES
Time and Matenal Rates for Call Malnt not covered 28S/hr IBM - 220/hr ADVENIR 95/hr i' 100 trp not inc. 150/hr not Inc. not inC.
Available Time and Matenal Svc Hrs (xxx to xxx) 8am - S pm 8am-Spm not inC. Sam-Spm not Inc not Inc
Occurance when PM IS periormed When Possible Annually N/A not inC. As Needed Potential Failure
Remedial Maintenance Included (Y/N) YES NO NO, neg w/IBM not Inc YES YES
Vendor Regular/Extended Area of Service Extended Regular Regular notlnc Regular Regular
Additional Cost for Extended Area Service 200/hr i' expenses 1/1/1/1/ 11//1/11 not inC. 1/1//11 1/1//11/
Response Time Guaranteed (Y/N) YES YES YES not inC. YES YES
Normal Response Time IS (Mln/Hours) 4 hrs 8 hrs 4 hrs not ine 4 hrs 24 hrs
Faster Response Time available (Y/N/Cost) YES NO negotiate w/lBM not inc. not Inc not InC 0
Closest Maintenance Office Location Bend, OR Seattle, WA Seattle, WA not inc Port Angeles, WA Seattle, WA N
Number of Service TechniCians 6 2 not Inc not Ine 2 approx 20 N
Number of Customer Sites not Inc not InC not Inc not inC. not available Approx. 100
peratlng System Software Support Available (Y/N) YES NO YES not Ine YES YES
endor Provides OS Software support (Y/N) YES@12S/hr or unmounted NO YES YES (limited) YES (limited not Inc
If NO then who does? IBM MICROSOFT/Novell IBM IBM not InC
Cost per MonthlY ear 222/mo not Inc 2000/yr
," ".," '",,' 1 ~ 1 I"~ - I. ' 1,(.\
larranty Period " . "L ' ,,-'< <~ I:
1''''( ,I' t.'- ~, ) . -' ~ " ' - ','I' " ' " f "
Hardware 1 Year 3 Year not inc. unknown 1 Year 1 Year
PrOVider of Service IBM not inc. IBM unknown IBM IBM
Operating System Software 1 Year NIA not inC. unknown 1 Year 1 Year
Provider of Service IBM MICROSOFT/Novell IBM unknown IBM IBM
Package Software 90 Days 1 Year 1 Year lifetime not inc. 90 Days
PrOVider of Service Avenlr Case lie Cayenta EDEN HTE NEW WORLD
Custom Software 90 Days N/A Lifetime not Inc Not Available
PrOVider of Service Avenlr NIA EDEN HTE 1/11/1/
RVER/PROCESSOR
Imber of Servers Proposed
mufacter of Server
pe of Server
)del of Server
lrver Processor Type/Speed
!ar Introduced
)w many Installed
"U Cycle Time (N/SECS)
I\M Memory Proposed (MB)
AM Memory Maximum allowed (MB)
AM Memory Maximum Increment (MB)
ystem Software Memory Overhead (MB)
lemory Access Time (N/SECS)
ower Failure Recovery-(Y/N}
attery Backup Time (Minutes)
; :edudancyiOptlons - Internal (Y/N)
- External (Y/N)
.
RFP for Integrated Financial Software and Related Hardware
Hardware and Operating System Summery
APPENDIX D
Avenir
Caselle
Cayenta
Eden
HTE
New World
.,l-...":..t.:~l~~~' '';::J~~.~.~~..:~I.:-l \"'..<,~ '," ., ,~t '-"',/:.. ~,. '.~;l"'.,t fi,".,"'; l.....~;.~.._~J)~.:tl.,.'1,~:\::1r1-'\
fIIt-~
1
IBM
ISERIES
9406-270
2000
not Inc.
465/30 CPW
16,000
46,000
256 MB
not Inc.
not tnC
YES
not Inc
Yes
not tnC
Cost of Server 83,885
1
NT4 0 or Novell 4.11
Compaq
Prollant ML530
PIli 500 or Higher
2001
12
not Inc.
1,000
4,000
not inc.
not inc.
not tnC
YES
25
YES
not Inc
8,925
.
4
IBM & Win2000
RS6000
P660 md 6HO
2 way RS64 III 450Mhz
2001
N/A
450 Mhz 10 Nsec
2,000
8,000
256 MB
60MB
10 Nsec
YES
25
YES / Mirrored
YES / RAID Level 10
117 ,300
2
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
1
IBM
iSERIES
9406-270
not tnC
2000
750,000
not tnc.
1024
not Inc
128 MB
64MB
not inc
YES
30
YES
not Inc
38,938 50
~.
1
IBM
iSERIES
9406-270-1517
not Inc.
2000
250,000+
not Inc.
256
16,000
12,000
not mc
not inc.
not inc
not Inc
not inc.
not Inc.
20,133
-
N
N
.
~VER OPERATING SYSTEM
nber of OS Software proposed
nufactuer of OS Software
Je of OS Software proposed
, Software Included m Hardware cost (Y/N)
lot, Cost
j Software Support Provided by
; Software Updates Provided by
ndor provide any first level OS Software Support
.es the OS Support,
Real Time Processing (Y/N)
Batch Processing (Y/N)
Multiprogramming/tasking (Y/N)
Multiple concurrent taskmg (Y/N)
Security (Y/N)
Number of Security Levels
By Time of DaylDay of Week (Y/N)
By User (Y/N)
By Port/Termlnal Locations (Y/N)
By Application System (Y/N)
Processing Job Control Language (Y/N)
Spooling (Input/Output/Both)
Remote Communlcaltons (Y/N)
Virtual Flies Within a Network (Y/N)
Redundancy Available (If yes, and type)
Parallel Server Redundancy (If yes, and type)
)S Software (Inel utllltles/compllers) resident on disk
)S Software needs how much disk storage reserved
IVhat OS Software Compilers are available
)S Software preferred Communlcalton Protocol
RFP for Integrated Financial Software and Related Hardware
Hardware and Operating System Summery
APPENDIX 0
Avenir
Cayenta
Caselle
Eden
HTE
New World
~:::,\:'.'< ':~\: ~:.~;~/\:.'. ~~ <~~ ~.. '~~~i. \:-..: ~~ !,~"f" .'~1;~l::'~ I'." :",', ,',~. '1 : J j. ~ ;'.~ ';-;.}~, I It:'i~~~:'~ ;l, . ':!:.:' ~':' I ','. I." ,n I .~\> 'j .' u\ (~ ',:..' >;J .::.... ~ .',:,..' ." . . I, . ~ .:' L"~ :~~ . t,.~ .~> ;';; ;,..:~ t~. ~ i :'~'~ 1~:<.l~ ',.., ~\;
1 1 1 unknown 1 1
IBM Microsoft/NOVELL IBM unknown IBM IBM
OS/400 NT4 0 or Novell 4 11 AIX 4 3 3 unknown OS/400 OS/400
YES NO YES unknown YES Yes
///1111 5595 /11//// unknown ///1/// 1////11
Avenlr Scantron Service Grp IBM unknown IBM IBM
IBM Microsoft/NOVELL IBM unknown IBM/HTEV AR IBM
YES NO NO un~nown YES YES
, '
YES YES YES unknown YES YES
YES YES YES unknown YES YES
YES YES YES unknown YES YES
not Inc NIA YES unknown not Inc YES
YES YES YES unknown YES YES
4 N/A YES unknown 5 6
NO YES YES unknown YES & NO NO
YES YES YES unknown YES YES N
NO YES YES unknown YES NO N
not Inc YES YES unknown YES YES N
YES NO YES unknown YES not Inc
YES YES BOTH unknown YES not mc
YES YES YES unknown YES not inC.
not Inc YES YES unknown YES notlnc
YES I RAID 5 YES I RAID 1 & 5 pwr/l/o/channellnic/boot unknown YES I RAID 5 not Inc
not Inc YES clustering unknown N/A not inc
YES NO YES unknown YES NO
7 -10 GB not Inc 1 GB unknown 2.4 GB not Inc.
RPG/COBOLlC++/C not InC Java/PL 1/C++/Fortran/RPG unknown RPG/COBOLlCT ILE RPG
ISDNITRlTCPIP/FDDI/802 3 NetBeUl/lPX/TCPIP/DLC TCP/IP, SNA unknown Async/SynclBlsync TCP/lP
3tabase Management Software System (DBMS)
S Software provide DBMS (Y/N)
3tabase Management Software System (DBMS) Type
anufacter of DBMS
oes the DBMS include;
Type of (Hlerarchical/lnverted/RatlonaI/Structure)
Data Dictionary (Y/N)
Database Management Instruction Language (Y/N)
Database Extract Reporting Language (Y/N)
Multi-Level Database Secunty (Y/N)
Database Recovery Utility (Y/N)
I 'oes the OS System Utility Software include;
Word ProcesslOg (Y/N/Cost)
Report Wnter (Y/N/Cost)
Text Editor (Y/N/Cost)
Graphics (Y/N/Cost)
Screen Format Programs (Y/N/Cost)
Program Generallon Language (Y/N/Cost)
Performance MonltonngfTunlOg (Y/N/Cost)
Usage data for Chargeback (Y/N/Cost)
File HandllnglSort/Merge (Y/N/Cost)
Database loggmg/recovery (Y/N/Cost)
Additional System software avail/special feat /cost
,erver Penperals
:Ioppy Dnve Capacity Proposed (MB)
:Ioppy Dnve Capacity Maximum (MB)
;ard Dnve (Y/N)
)uantlty of Hard Dnves
rype of Hard Dnves
-lard Dnve Capacity Proposed (MB)
-lard Dnve Capacity Maximum (MB)
Cost of Disk/Diskette Storage
RFP for Integrated Financial Software and Related Hardware
Hardware and Operating System Summery
APPENDIX D
Avenir Case lie Cayenta Eden HTE New World
,111-, ,~<. ,," 1;', " ,-~~'l~ ~~_.,!.~';" '1 ,I ~ -'
..... -~
YES NO NO unknown YES YES
DB2 N/A ORACLE 81 unknown DB2 DB2
IBM N/A ORACLE unknown IBM IBM
, v I,' ~ .,\1., I ';' ',1,( ,:'
Rational N/A ALL unknown Rational Hler./lnvert /Rat.
YES N/A YES unknown YES YES
YES N/A YES unknown YES YES
YES N/A YES unknown YES YES
YES N/A YES unknown YES YES
YES N/A YES unknown YES YES
',' \ -,' ,
'.'" ..- .... I '~ ;-
NO N/A NO unknown NO NO
YES N/A NO unknown NO YES I Included
YES N/A NO unknown NO YES /Included
YES / w/COLD FUSION N/A NO unknown NO N
YES / wlCOLD FUSION N/A NO unknown YES YES I Included
YES N/A NO unknown NO YES I Included ~
YES N/A YES unknown YES YES /Included C\I
YES N/A YES unknown NO NO C\I
YES N/A YES unknown YES YES
YES N/A YES unknown YES YES
DB2 N/A N/A unknown not Inc not inc
;':-~~r:(;:{~I;':-r:tY.'r!~';.'L:,' >~ ,';~r':,~):<r:'/:"~ 1.. ~' .' ~;'\"fi:' '~ld".'!, "~'!1" .' '~~.< ..~ '~;:.': ;3J,,; 'l~'~i ~. .' ! ,",'.' (".,~ r;'; ~~'l:,: .\ ,:~~:';. ~'" "!'~:'.';."I"';,-:-'~\:J;~J
N/A 1 44 MB N/A unknown not mc not Inc
N/A 1 44 MB N/A unknown not inc. not Inc
YES YES YES unknown YES YES
not Inc 1 not IOC unknown 6 not inc
IBM MOL 43181754 GB not Inc. Ultra SCSI unknown SCSI not IOC.
70 GB 364GB 108 GB unknown 68 64 GB , 2,574
421 GB 8736GB 2TB unknown not inc not Inc.
Inc in server pnce IOC 10 server pnce IOC 10 server pnce unknown IOC 10 server pnce inc, in server price
.
.
.
224
MEMO
FINANCE
DEPARTMENT
Yvonne ZlOmkowskl
Finance Director
[4601]
Carol Hagar
Administrative Assistant
[4600]
Karen Asquith
.ccountlllg Mgr.
[4605]
Tanya O'NeIll
IT Mananger
[4630]
.
nORT ,ANGELES
1~ tl, I
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. 'A.
Appendix E
IT Analysis
DATE:
February 22, 2002
To:
FINANCE COMMITTEE
FROM:
Tanya O'Neill, Information Technology Manager
SUBJECT: Integrated Financial System Analysis
I
SUMMARY: The IT staffhas analyzed thelHTE vendor response to the Request for
Proposal as it relates to the Integrated Financial System and the attached summaries
outline the assumptions and the pros and +ns of the proposed hardware as they
apply to the city's network and the inclusion of a new operating system into the
existing city infrastructure. I
RECOMMENDATION: None. For Informational Purposes Only
Based upon the analysis with information brovided by HTE and other vendors,
Information Technology finds the proposdd HTE system to adequately meet the city
standards for hardware requirements and Jperating system functions, including but
I
not limited to security, virus detection and operation for a period of two to four
years before hardware and/or operating s~stem upgrades are required.
ISSUE: Will the vendor HTE hardware ana operating system recommendation as
proposed in the submitted Request for PrJposal adequately meet the standards for
hardware requirements and operating sys~em functions for the coexistence of the
proposed AS/400 hardware and OS/400 dperating system into the City's existing
network hierarchy.
BACKGROUND 1 ANALYSIS: For the past 2 months, the IT staff has been analyzing
and reviewing with the Accounting and austomer Services Divisions various issues
I
for the procurement of a new Integrated Financial System. These issues include
analysis of the hardware and operating s~stem requirements and the ability to
commonly coexist in the city's current network infrastructure.
The Information Technology Division fiidS that all hardware and operating
systems, as proposed by HTE, adequatel~ meet the standards and requirements of
the city's current and planned technology and shall coexist in the current network
infrastructure. I
i
The attached summaries outline the pro~osed hardware as they apply to the city's
network and the inclusion of a new operating system into the existing city network.
225
Information Technology Integrated Financial System Analysis:
We received responses from the following vendor's: Avenir, Caselle, Cayenta, Eden, HTE, and
Logos New Wodd. Subcommittees made up of city employees from various departments evaluated .
and ranked each software application from an end-user standpoint for all of the vendors who
responded to the RFP. An executive committee was formed to combine the subcommittees rankings
with the other selection criteria to come up with the top three vendors of HTE, Eden and A venir.
Information Technology staff analyzed in depth, the top three remaining vendors hardware and
operating system functions including security issues, installation and ease of use.
Analysis ofthe hardware recommended and the basic operating system and its ability to coexist with
current city technology while fulfilling future requirements for growth, security, virus detection, and
ease of use, a point value was given to each of the finalist as follows:
A venir Points Eden Points HTE Points
Operatmg System OS/400 10 Lmux, 8 OS/400 10
Wmdows/2000,
WmdowslNT, Novell
Hardware IBM 10 None Recommended 0 IBM AS/400 10
AS/400
No Servers 1 3 to 7 1
ReqUIred
Database Yes/DB2 8 No Response 0 Yes/DB2 8
Management
Secunty - User AS/400 4 ApplicatIOn Level 4 Yes-to record 10
secunty level
only - None Yes- to field
through the level
ApplicatIOn
Modules
Secunty - Internet Yes-AS/400 8 Through Network 4 Yes-AS/400 8
Secunty - Intruder Yes 8 Through Firewall 4 Yes 8
DetectIOn
Total Point Value 48 20 54
.
HTE was ranked highest with the ability to meet the criteria as analyzed by the IT staff. Site visits
were performed at Olympia, W A and Lacy, W A to det~rmine conversion problems, installation,
communications and ability to monitor and maintain the required systems. Although both site visits
were for an older HTE product, the information gathered indicated no problems with the installation,
maintenance, or customer support ofthe proposed vendor. There are still questions that need to be
addressed however, and we feel confident that HTE will respond in the affirmative. HTE adequately
met the city standards and requirements for coexisting within the city's network infrastructure.
Below is the criteria the hardware and operating system was required to coexist. The IT Division
currently has three full-time staff members to install, monitor, maintain, upgrade, research and
develop all city technology while continuing the technological vision ofthe city as it relates to fiber .
optics, voice-over IP, video conferencing, wireless communications (which was installed in 2001),
kiosks, and the selection of independent software solutions available in today's marketplace. The
inclusion of any new hardware, operating sy~nd database structure must be guided by the
systems ability to coexist within the existing infrastructure.
.
.
Append F
Cost Ana is
.
227
.
.
.
228
RFP for Integrated Financial softwJe and Related Hardware
2/27/028:48
Avenir Caselle Cayenta Eden HTE New World
fIling Systems
erating system software 25,885 5,595 15,915 5,780
edundancy 3,000
Utilities compilers, etc. 2,500
ROMS software
Oracle - Dual processor 17,143
Acuate Workbench & Developer Kit 3,214
Acu4GL (50 licenses) 14,807
Citrix 11,430
CV2 (20 Licenses) 4,000
OMS IBM Application 4,500
ROMS installation 3,200 5,900
Total Operating System Software $25,885 $5,595 $59,294 $5,900 $20,415 $5,780
Financial
Application Packages: 180,800
General Ledger 5,000 28,000 60,000 28,150 25,200
I
Budget Tracking and Preparation 0 65,000
I
Accounts Receivable 5,000 0 9,550 3,000
I
Accounts Payable 7,000 0
I
Purchasing 3,000 0 16,950
I
Cash Receipting/Management a,oor 0 14,632 8,000 3,000
Cash Receipting Interface 1,500
Investment Management 45,675
Payroll/Human Resources 13,000 0 53,000 18,200 18,000
I
.oan Management 5,000 5,450
I
usiness Licenses 3,000 15,000 6,550 4,200
Modifications
(please list by module)
General Ledger 15,400
Accounts Receivable 4,400
Payroll/HR 1,760
Custom Development
Other (list)
Graphical User Interface 6,450
Data Dictionary 1,500
Crystal Reports - Training/Installation 14,600
Cog nos Report Writer 895
Standard Forms 9,000
Activation Fee 22,000
Discount (19,650) (93,238)
Uniface runtime for HR 5,715
Total Financial Software Charges $180,800 $49,000 $98,715 $195,257 $22,507 $81,410
Operations Management 10,000
Application Packages
Job/Project Costing 5,000 0 16,000
Work Order I 10,000 6,000
Equipment Management 0 43,540 17,550 6,000
I
.ventory 5,000 0 5,400
I
ixed Asset 3,000 10,000 12,000 34,600 3,000
Grant Tracking/Management I 0 3,000
I
Permits 60,000 17,300 8,400
Modifications 229
(please list by module)
Fixed Asset 11,000
1
RFP for Integrated Financial Software and Related Hardware
2/27/02 8:48
Avenir Caselle Cayenta Eden HTE New World
Custom Development
Other (list) .
Discount (13,200) (69,447)
Uniface runtime for Fixed Assets 1,143
Uniface runtime for Work Orders 1,143
Operations Management $10,000 $13,000 $22,286 $118,340 $3 $42,800
Utility Billing 10,000 19,000 0 35,000 37,850 25,800
Application Packages
Modifications 10,340
Custom Development
Other (list)
Discount (5,250) (37,849)
Uniface runtime for UtilityManager 8,000
Utility Billing Software Charges $10,000 $19,000 $8,000 $29,750 $1 $36,140
System Operations Charges 12,000
Crystal Reports 3,000
Total Software Charges $226,685 $98,595 $188,295 $352,247 $42,926 $166,130
Hardware: .
Processor
IBM iSeries Server 58,000 38,939 25,722
Compaq Proliant ML530 8,995
Unix Server 75,000
File Server 12,000
Acutuate Report Server 15,000
Distributed Report Server 300
Disk/diskette
Storage
Tape/Cassette
Storage
CD/RW
Communications
Redundancy
Cables, connectors
Applicable taxes
Installation fee 1,500 700
Freight, insurance 200 250
Other (list) 1,500
Total Hardware Charges $58,200 $12,245 $102,300 $700 $38,939 $25,722
.
230
2
RFP for Integrated Financial sottwarl and Related Hardware
2/27/028:48
Avenir Caselle Cayenta Eden HTE New World
.ssional Services and Fees: 208,500
roject Management 18,000 38,082 14,000
Fixed Assets & Work Orders 24,080
Utility Billing 14,000
System set-up consultation 27,725
Fixed Assets & Work Orders 18,200
Utility Billing 7,500
Data conversion 50,000 107,650 12,600 16,000
Fixed Assets & Work Orders 22,400
Utility Billing 35,000
System Installation 77,500 20,125
Fletcher & Fletcher Budget System 23,500
JavaLine Modules 6,560
Fixed Assets & Work Orders 18,200
Utility Billing 28,000
Training 27,750 7,000 104,500 52,800
HR 14,000
CV2 Script Training 2,800
Fletcher & Fletcher Budget System 8,500
Fixed Assets & Work Orders 49,000
Utility Billing 45,500
Documentation(minimum 2 hard copies)
Total Professional Services and Fees $173,225 $135.401 $350,405 $208,500 $149,142 $82,800
ennual Service and Maintenance 43,180
Server 3,600 1.35r 1,677
Server Operating Software 2,700 2,000 0
Internet Solutions 3,600
Modules 54,480 13,200 56,800 31,320
Existing Cayenta Modules 25,000
Additional GL 5,600
Fletcher & Fletcher Budget System 23,000
Municipality Manager 20,000
Human Resources 10,000
Utility Billing 10,000
Fixed Assets & Work Orders 4,000
ROMS Oracle 3,429
BEA WebLogic 3,286
Citrix 2,286
Acu4GL 4,442
Acutuate Report Writer 5,643
JavaLine Annual Support 10,650
Uniface - Municipality Manager 1,142
Uniface - Fixed Assets & Work Orders 456
Uniface - Uitility Billing 1,600
Total Annual Service and Maintenance $64,380 $14,550 $119,884 $43,180 $69,450 $32,997
I
Other(list)
I
e Expenses & Taxes I 6,800
I
I
Total Professional Services & Annual Maint. $237,605 $149,9510 $470,289 $258,480 $218,592 $115,797
231
3
RFP for Integrated Financial Software and Related Hardware
2/27/02 8:48
Avenir Caselle Cayenta Eden HTE New World
Internet Solutions: 9,000.
Internet solutions software 40,000 48,500
SEA WebLogic 14,286
Internet solutions hardware 2,000
Citrix/WebLogic Server 15,000
Internet solutions set-up 2,400 2,000
Internet solutions training 800 64,000 2,000
Internet solutions annual maintenance 8,730
Total Internet Solutions $40,000 $0 $32,486 $0 $121,230 $15,000
Other Charges:
Other (list)
Taxes 27,756
Travel 14,400
Total Other Charges $0 $0 $0 $27,756 $0 $14,400
Total Charges $562,490 $260,790 $793,370 $639,183 $421,687 $337,049
.
.
232
4
o
~
.~
~
.
.
FORT ANGELES
I
WAS H I N G TON, U.S. A.
I
I
HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE
I
February 27,2002
To: Mike Quinn, City Manager
From: Susanne Connel~uman Resources lDivision
I
Re: Summary Recruitment Report: November 2001 through February 2002
Mike, below is an update on the recruitment activity Jandled by Human Resources over the past
few months. Additionally, Bob has completed the update of the City's Civil Service Rules,
I
Regulations and Ordinance, which was a Council goal.
NEW HIRES - Regular Full-Time
Bud Rudolph Senior Accountant, 2/15/02
Eric Walrath Assistant Civil Engineer I, 2/28/02
Scott Johns Associate Planner, 3/4/02
RESIGNATIONS/RETIREMENTS
Karen Haugstead Police Admin Assistant, retired 1/4/02
Steve Evans Solid Waste Supervisor, retired 1/18/02
Debbie Dolan Cashier, terminated 2/5/02 I
Ron Johnson Engineering Specialist, retired '2/27/02
Bambi Wentzel On-call Cashier and Meter Reaaer, leaving 3/02
TRANSFERS/PROMOTIONS
Ken Loghry Promoted to Solid Waste Supervisor 2/4/02
I
Richard Foster Transferred from Water to Utility Worker II Solid Waste 2/4/02
Wade Mackey Transferred from Parks to Utility Worker II Solid Waste 2/11/02
ON-CALL POSITIONS
On-call Cashier 700 hours/year and On-Call Meter Reader 1,000 hours/year budgeted.
Teresa Owen On-call Cashier, 2/25/02
Susan Vess On-call Cashier, 2/26/02
Amanda MacLean On-call Cashier, 2/25/02
Ralph Ellsworth On-call Meter Reader, 2/22/02
JOB POSTINGS - Currently in process:
Cashier (vacancy from termination) I
I
Utility Worker I (vacancy from employee transferring I to Solid Waste)
I
233 I
.
.
.
234
o
i
~
.
.
~ORT ANGELlES
:W. ASH I N G TON, U. 5 l A.
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES IDEPARTMENT
DATE:
March 5, 2002
To:
Glenn Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
Scott McLain, Deputy Director for powJ Systems
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Power Supply Update
The power supply contract with Bonneville Power Administration (BP A) the City entered into for
the period from October 2001 through September 2006 bonsists of base rates for energy, demand,
and load variance. Also included are cost recovery adju1stment clauses (CRAC's) based on the
actual expenditures required. The load- based CRAC tHat was implemented last October was
46.225% applied to the base rate. Retail rates were adjJsted by 19.5% to partially recover these
increased power costs. The load-based CRAC is adjustbd every six months based on forecasts by
the BP A. The load based CRAC for the next six month~, starting in April, will be 39.92%,
resulting in somewhat lower wholesale power costs to the City.
I am not proposing any changes to the retail rates for thl next six month period. When rates were
set in October 2001 about $1.7 million was used to offs~t power purchase costs for the following
two year period. The new wholesale rates will still reqJire use of reserves, but not at the levels
previously required.
Clallam PUD also raised retail rates in February 2001, oy 14% and again in October 2001 by
another 24%, which increased their energy rates from 4]46 cents per KWH to 6.4 cents per KWH.
They did not use any of their financial reserves and are bonsidering lowering their retail rates by
3.5% in April. The City's current residential energy ratb is 4.75 cents per KWH.
I
I
There are also two other CRAC's that could affect wholesale power prices during the term of the
contract. The financial-based CRAC can be implementbd each year based on the actual financial
performance of BP A and is based on some preset finanJial criteria. There is also a safety-net
CRAC that can be implemented ifBPA expects that th9Y may miss a treasury payment. At this
time, it is likely that the financial-based CRAC will trigger at some level in October 2002. This
CRAC is capped at 11 %.
235
.
.
.
236
.
I
.', I
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECj CHANGE ORDERS
ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, FEBRUARY, 2002
I
(Costs shown do not in,clude taxes)
PROJECT PROJECT ORlGINAL PREVIOUS CHANGE REVISED
TITLE NU1\1BER CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS CONTRACT
AMOUNT ORDERS THIS AMOUNT
MONTH
Airport Rd. 91-07 $951,589.91 $86,445.69 $0.00 $1,038,035.60
Realignment
8th Street Restoration 99-08 $1,684,518.60 $140,547.31 $0.00 $1,825,065.91
Black Diamond Res. Imp. 99-18 $890,913.07 $68,042.81 $0.00 $958,955.88
Landfill Closure 20-04 $883,325.65 $180,413.44 $0.00 $1,063,739.09
Francis Street Park 21-07 $312,605.93 $75,659.46 $0.00 $388,265.39
Laurel Retaining Wall 96-05 $116,405.77 ; $0.00 $56,150.00(a) $172,555.77
I
'Vater SCADA, Phase II 21-22 $43,810.00 I $2,348.00 $0.00 $46,158.00
a. Contract Change Order No. 1 included added excavation aAd quantities not included in original contract.
I
. PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS/PURCHASE O~ERS APPROVED BY CITY MANAGER
FEBRUARY, 2002
I
.
(Costs shown do not i:qclude taxes)
I
CONTRACTOR Project- DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
OR VENDOR PO# I
I
Winnop Excavating Dumbwaiter Demolition, Carnegie Library $2,942.00
I
Northwestern Ennis Street Slide Rebair $6,250.00
Territories, Inc. I
I
Sargent Engineers Elwha/Morse Creek Bridge Evaluations $4,065.00
Inc. I
I
N \PWKS\ENGINEER\MGRRPT\co02-02 wpd
237
.
.
.
238
.
.
.
Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission
I
January 24, 2002
Minutes
I. Call to Order:
The January 24, 2002 meeting of the Parks, Recreation and Beautification
Commission was called to order in the City Hall Council Chambers at 7:05
p.m. by vice chairman, Matt Kirsch.
II. Roll Call:
Members Present: Matt Kirsch, Chuck Whidden, Larry Little, Pat Deja, Diana
Tschimperle, Damaris Rodriguez,
Members Absent: David Morris
Staff Present: Marc Connelly and Mari A. Bilsborrow
III. Approval of Minutes & Audio Tape Disposition:
Chuck Whidden moved to approve the gecember 13, 2001 minutes as
presented and dispose of the tapes in the usual manner. Upon call for the
question, Pat Deja seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
IV.
V.
VI.
Items from the Audience Not on the AQenda
None
Legislation
None
Other Considerations .
a. Comprehensive Park Open Space and Recreation Plan prbcess
The current City's Comprehensive Park, IRecreation and Open Space Plan
was last adopted in 1995. The Plan establishes strategic direction and
I .-
priorities for the provision of services delivered by the Department of Parks &
Recreation. The plan is required to be updated on at least a 5-year cycle to
enable the City to remain eligible for State grant funding assistance. It has
been over seven years since the City haJ updated this plan, and therefore is
overdue.
The Comprehensive Park, Open Space and Recreation Plan establishes the
community's priorities for services relatJd to parks, open space, recreation
and the fine arts. To reflect the attitude1s and opinions of the residents of
Port Angeles, an effective and comprehJnsive public process should be
established enabling comment on needs land priorities for the future.
Consequently, staff has outlined the follbwing as a proposed process for
I
i
239
Park Commission
January 24,2002
2
.
enabling and gathering public comment for Park Commission review and
approval.
To complete Section One of the Comprehensive Plan, Staff is proposing a
process utilizing five distinct steps to obtain public comment related to the
future of parks and recreation services in Port Angeles including
Neighborhood based planning workshops, citizen survey, focus group
interviews, staff/Parks Commission workshops and public hearings.
The proposed summary process time line includes:
. Plan Process/Organize Review - January
. Survey Sub-committee appointment - March
. Neighborhood Workshops - March, April, May
. Citizen Survey Development - April, May
. Stakeholder/Key Informant Interviews - May to September
. Revise/Update Facility and Program Inventory - June, July
. Review and revise facility classifications - June, July
. Staff Workshops - June, July
. Citizen Survey Review by Parks Commission - June
. Citizen Survey Review/Approval by City Council - July
. Citizen Survey Distributed - September
. Citizen Survey Returned - October
. Commissioners Workshop/Survey Results Review - October
. Preliminary Draft Plan - November/December
. Parks Commission Approval of Revised Draft Plan - December
. City Council adoption of Plan - January
.
Staff recommended that the Parks, Recreation and Beautification
Commission review, comment and approve the proposed process for
updating the Comprehensive Park, Open Space and Recreation Plan.
Park Commission discussion ensued regarding the best way to obtain input
from the general public. Suggestions included direct mailings of public
hearing meeting dates, two survey options (single page and multi page), and
Question and Answer call-in session at Radio KONP prior to each public
meeting.
It was also suggested that the dates for the public hearings be changed from
Wednesday evenings to Tuesday or Thursday evenings.
The Park Commission unanimously agreed with the proposed Comprehensive .
240
.
.
.
Park Commission
January 24, 2002
Park Open Space and Recreation Plan prlcess.
3
VII. Park Board Late Items
The board discussed and agreed upon the need to determine an appeal
I
process prior to hearing Mr. George Snyder's petition asking to be accepted
back at William Shore Memorial Pool.
VIII. Executive Sessions
None
IX. Adiournment
Chuck Whidden motioned for adjournme~t. Diana Tschimperle seconded the
motion which carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:50 pm.
241
.
.
.
242
, CLALLAM <;OUNTY HUMANE SHE R REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JAN. 2002
-- ~- -----
, ,
__.. _,__ ____ ____H__ ___ _~_ __ ____ ___~___~.__ _____.___, _'-___ ~__ __ _ ___
,
_____ _H . ________~___~_
~equim ACO : 2! I i, ,,::: I 2
~ -)- -- - -- - - --- --~ - -- -~ -- - -~-* - - - - - - - -* - -.,.. - --~* - - -*. - 1 - - ~-_.~ - - - -~ -~- - ----- -- - -., ---~--~ ------. -l- -- ---.- ---- -----...-___ ~ _________ _ . _~ _ __ _ _ _*_H __..... ~_ _ ____ _ __ _ _. ___ _ __ _ _ _ .. ___ __ _ _ _h__ _4-_ ___ .__ _ __ ___
~()\Ner ~lwhah~llC9JIli.Q9________ _ ;________ _______:r___ __ _____~_______ ___ __~ _ _________~-- :!, _ _~__
C t P bl 5t 0 20' I , -r-- -----------;---------..----r" ---*-. -- ;---- _____H_ --- ~--------------:- ---- -- - 20
__QUD__Y__ _ U ic __ _, .ray _ 99?--- ----:- -__ __ __ ___ ;____ _ _ ____ ' 4-___________ ___________________,._ _ _____________L __ _________ --_i.______________.___ ___ __ ___ ~ __ __ __ _ ____ _<__ _ __ ___ ____ __ __ ______<_00________ _ ___
J ' I j ,
(;_9u_O.t:Y pu_b!i<:._ ~?u[r_ Q99?___ ___L -- ----?1; _ _ _ _____:._______ __ __ __ ____~_________ __ _ L. _ ___ ___ ___~ __________L______ ____ ' __ _P__ _~_ _________ __ :__ _ ______?_4._
D09s_left_ at ~b~lt~r _ --__ __ _______:__ _ -___ __ __ _~;----- _ _____ __, ____ _____ -__L______________ ! ' _______ _ __._______ _ ___ ~_____ ______ _, __ ___ ___ _ _ __:______ _________; _________ ___ ;00__ _ ___ _ __ ..______ ______ .9
(;ity.AqQPt~9 R9,9.s _ ___ -_ _ _"__ ___ ;-___ ___ __lJ: _ ___ _ __ ,__ _______ _ -i __ __ ____"_ ~__ ____ _ __ : . i _ __ ________:______ ___ __ --t- __ __u __ ____;n_________ _ _'- ________JJ_
(;().untyAd()Pt~d [)Q9~_ ____ ___ _L -_ __ 26 ~__ - - ____ __ _ : _ _ ___n_ __ _~_____ __ -_________L_____ __________ ____ t.---u _ 00___ --r-- ___ _ ______:______________ __ ______n;_ __ ____ __ __: ____n__,2~_
(;0. &_ Other!IA~__RTQ P99~-_ ___~___P _ uu__~;_ ____up _m _~__ ______ _____;____ ___________L __ _________ ___ _ ___ :__ ________ __I __ _ ___ __ _m_p _____'____ up ____.__pu_ __ 5
PA_ Ac:Q(RTO DO!J~_____ m - _________:_ - __ _ ____ _~~ + __u_________:___ _ _______ ___~-- ___ _ _____~- ____ ___ n__ .:._ _______ _ __ ____ 1_ _ __ __ __ _ _ ~u ___ _____ _:__ ___ _ _ __ n_:______ ___ _ ,2_
f',J\ Citi?_eD_BIQ_P09?u_____ ____ ____;_____ _ __ __1; - __ _ _ __ ______ __ .00___ ____ __ __ ___ __ _ _:_ __ n __ ___ _ __;.._ _ __ _ _L___ __ ___ ___ ~__p_ ___ __~------- _ __ ..4._
~VOCountyRTOD09S- _____ 7; ,: ' . ,I _ : _ i 7
Seq~-i~- RTO- -- 00- -- -- _n_ ---- ---- ~- -- -- - 000 ;------ --- - -- -:- ----- --Pi------- - ------- --- -----00 -- n____ ---- - --- - ;--- -- - --------------- ---:~:__ ~_~__~~_:~:-::_:::--~--::-- _~_~;_--_=:::::_:-_O-
i.~w~~~h-~---R1D- - ----- --- --- -- - f- -- -- - -- --0 T--- --- --- --; ------------ -- -------:---------- _m_________ -i ---- -- I --- --; --- -------- ____ __ _ ~ _____ _n_ _ _~ _ _n__ __ _____i_ __ ____ __ _ _0_
IAS p~ D~gi:- --- '::---:-:- - - --- - -:-- - :--- - -: -: -_ -J;--__-: ----- -----:~ --- ::-~: --_ -::: ____ ___::- :--~:_=- - ------ --- ___:::_-_ ~::____~___:__:-:_ ___- :-_::~:_ -_-~:_::_-_____:~--_:~~- _ :-- :_:_~-_~: __ _00____ -i _ __ __ ___ _ _i. _ _ _ __ _ ___:_u__ ____ _ .1.
- f8~c;Q.Dog~J?I~_u_n ----- --- ~:---~__ - __ JL___.___ --- -;---- , ________.____ ___..__",________ _ J
~~u~~~zg~~';ijyI~~ ... .~ u__ -.. -~;L:. u:..=.~:= ::.~ ..!__ _:::=: -u-:..::~-..=:_:=:=f: :. :.Tu-:~-;'-:. :_:~ i~
LAS DOA P9gs '1 ! : ; ! ii, ;, 1
:~A -~C9:_DO~ _~~: :-: _ :_:-: ::-:::: ~:::: _: ____: __:-_~-JL:- -: ---~_ _ - - ~ -__-_:- ::-_-_::_::::::-:_-::~-- --- -i -----::-:- ::__::-~= ________ _ _~_ _ __ :::___:__:---~:- _ -__-~_:~:-___-- ;_ _: _ _:__---- ;- _ :-: -=-: - _: :;- __ __: - :__ ::- -:_ - __::: :____-:_-_1:
PA Ci!iz~ _POA~D..99S.- _ _ __ _ --_ _: _ _ __ _ _ L_ _____ __ n ; _______ n -_ -: ______ ___ _. _ ______ ___ ____ __ __. ___ _ __ _ ___ _ _ _ 1- _ __ _ _ _ _ ~_ __ _ _ _ 1_
~)g~%,~~~DQ9s: ....... ... .... ..k :.:. T ::..:::: .u__.:;...:_~ -~t::-:.~:..- .:..:I:::-:L:-_ -I: .:_:_ L: .:. . :::_- b
_F?A ~~O_QlJ~r~n._~!r)~_Q09~- - --:00- ----------Ql---- --___ n___~__ -- ________~n--____ --- _ ~--------------'---_____ ; _____ ____u____ ;--------------i- _ ___n_ ___~ ______ ---i- u _ ______l___________.9._
Other uarantim~Do ~ p __nu __ 1: : ' I j :":' 1
i---- -- __M_ __.0-- ~ - --_ __..__ M_.__ ",_____ ___ ___ __ __ _, ___. ______ ~ __ _ ____ __ _ __
Complaints Handled in C( 3: i , i : i . , ': : 3
... .._ ..._._...~~.~~..'~,"::,!.-~'''I.'".'~,~I.:'.' 1.~'~.~.!~I~L.._.~I.I.~.i;-I'-~~.~.\':-~_.~_I':_I_._I_~I' I!.I.':- I_"'_':'_I.~~~_I.'-:-'_I.. .J~I~_~,,_L~U_L.
. . "...... ...; ...,J,ClJL )Fe!:?.. ..).~..a.r ...;APf. ...~~.ay. .ll~f!.. .l}~J.. ...;A~g.. .~$.~P. ;9~J... ;.Noy.. :D~.~ ..;YTD
ACQ .Stray.C.a~~ .... .. ..... ....[, ........ .. 3 [ . ...."...:."... .... L ... . ",...t......"...... ~.... . "... ...1 .. . . ... . .. " .~. . i... . ..:.. ., . "'.. ..... , .. ... . .3
ACQ, .~\ft:G~:~..... .. ......... .:".. " .0 ;......", ..' ..." . ...~ ....... ..[... .. ..... ..~.. . ... ;....". ,,;.... .. """ .. J ...... "'''. J . . . 0
.PA Ci.ti?e.n.Str.~Y.c.~t~.... ... ""." .. .9.L. ..... .:. ..".. .l.. ... .......t... .... .....L.. . .......: :: " .... '. ...' .~
p A..c~i1i.t;en. ~wr C~t~ ...." 1 4[, .. . ... ..;... ; ..... ..! ...... ..:...... '" L...... .. . .. "'" .. "'"'' ,.. .. . "'....' ..... 14:
~/Q Tru~k S!r~Y C;;~ts.. ... .. . "'f:.:"""" 1.Q~",........' . ... . .. "', . "'. "'''','' "'. .'" ,..... .... . "","'"'' "......' . .... .". ...., ...... ... .;. ...10.
.5./0 Tru.c~ Sl,Jrr. C~t~..". """"." .. .....2 l. .. ... . ..... ..... .;"'. ... .."...,,~... ......,,,.... .....,,;"'......... "", .... "'. ....., . ......, :.. ...~
.~equim ACO C.~t$tfay~. ..."'.. . ;.... ... ...... ~ l . .' .... .. .. . .... ...... ~ " .. .....;.. .... .... L.. ...... .f..... .. ........;...... ... ;............ ,. .. . 2
.~~quirn.ACQ.~~~..$lJ~ren9~r~....L............0:.... ..... ... i'''''''''''''','''''''' ......f.",,,,........f .... " ,...... .....f'" ....... ...:... . . ..;. ..... "r'" ..... 0.
C;Qu,nty public..$1rCly..C~t~. .... [ ... . .. 12 i . . .... .....,......" '........~.. "'" .. .. t. '" "''' .!' . . ... ... 1.?
C.QlmtYJ~.!Jblic .S~rr ~~1~.. .. . [. .""'" .1..~.~..... . '" ........ .." "... "...."...... ;............ .. .;... "'...... : .. ''''''''...",. '" . '" ..., ..... ".... 19
(;:C!ts.L~ft .a.t. $h~lt~.r.. .... ... l... . .. 23~ '" ..... ... ,... '"'''' ....'" ...... . "'''''' ... f......... ... f....", ........ . f'" ...... . -+ ..... ...... f.. . . . . "'.,...... . . .?3.
.Cixy Adop~e~rC;~1;S . .... .. ......: ........ . ~j . .. ...... [.... ..' .. .l "'. ."'.. .. .. ..", ..:..... . .. ... l . " ..... i ... ... ......:... '"'' '''. . . .... ...,..... ... .. ~.... ..... ...,...... .~.
.Cqunty.A.qqp~~.g.~a.t:s...... ......;..... ...1.1.;......... ...~."'. .".......~"'. .."...,. . .........[....... ....;",. "''''. ..~. .....;.... ....;. "'... ..;..... ......;..... ........ ;.. ... 11
LAS RTQ. C~t~ "'''''''' '" "'. ...... f. ..... .... OJ ......~.... .. .. .. ;... ""'" .... .\..... "'....... .f. ....... .. .~. .. ....... f..... ....;... ..... .....~............ ...~ ... .. .. . f........ ",..; . .. ..... 0
.PA.ACO(RTO.C;:~.~.... . ..............L... . ....9.[... ....... ;... ..'" ..;.. ..........l.. . ....L ....... ......,,,,...,,,......:..... ..........~ '''''' ... ~....",,,,........L......... .f...... """ l.... ......0.
PAq.tiz~n..R.TQC;:.at~....... ...... ~......... .~.~. ........l.... '" ~.......... .L.....",..""...",.. .....~.............l.......", ....,. .........: ........[.............:...........1.....".2
.$/O.C9Un.~Y.R:fO.C~ts.................~....... ..P.;....'" .....;.... ....",....). .........",;.. .............;........ .. ..f...... ....... .+....... .. .~ ..... ...... ." "'''''''J'''''' .....~..............J. ... ..?7..
.S~gu.im RIO. ~~.t$.. "... ... ... ". ....~ ..... . O.l .' .. .....~ "" .." ~ ".... ". .~........ ......l ".... "".. .[............. ~.... h" h "" [. '"'' """ . ."...... ..hL .. "h. . " "~'''' ... .... .. ..[. . .... . .Q.
(~9U!l~R,!O (;a~?"h h......hhh....m.~h..... ...1,,:. .." "" '"", ",h. """"h' '''h''~'''' ""'''';''h ."....hh l '''''''h' .h:...h .". .: "h ... "" h"'~'''''''h'''''; '''..'''''' ..,... ....../.
Lowc#loElwha RTO Cats : 0;: : f :; :: 0
:~A 'Aet?~~~'.P.i:i::': .'." :..: ,,,:, ::':.:.:. 'h" ::':. :.:.3,[,' . ::.': :::.:: .,.:.: hh .... .....:...." "'''T'''''h'' h"T"" . ...... "[' . h... . .,. .". .... h..." h..;..... h." ": .... . .. "i'''''''' ..~:
.~A"q~iz~n C;at~.f'TS..... ...h..... "",h" ".. .lL"............. ":h h. "'" ." .:. t:: .:::':.:::.: :::: t:. ::.:.::.....":.:t.,,:::.:: :'..:. ::::':h':: ,,':..: .::':...::::::::.:... ::':':'.:.::.: .:.:: (::. :.:":.::... .I.:::h:::' :'::..:T. ',,:,':. 2.1
.s.!Q.1rnp. .C.a~s.J~T~....".... ........: "'h'''' . h~';'''' .........:... . hh'.. ..[. .. h' ...... L..h. "....... ....l... h""'",,, : ,,,, ...... l.....h..... h..;..............:.... .." ..,,:..... ...... h'~""""'" . ~..... "..... .e.
.(~9unty.~~~~.PIS.'''h .."..h".....l...............;...". "."hh;h' ...." ';'h" ....... L...."......h....~.. .........hh;.....h...... ,.. "h...".."l''''''h'''h ,.. .. . .....;. ..... .h.....Lh.".. ........(............0
LAS Cats PTS 1 9 i : f if: f : f f, 1 9
PTS/Sick/FerreI/Other cats: 8 i : . : i ! ; ! i j ! : 8
{~}:{~~~~~;J:c~~ts!~hJ;gl~!:gr:~tm~:~!mJrgiJiJiH
:i.:~i:::ih~~ci::'~::i::::"::: ::::':':. :'::::::J:.: ::'::.::~ .~J::'. :,,:'.:::::~:l-:'" :::.::: .~:l:-:::::::.':::'::6.r:.....::::.:.::gC::::::::.:':::~r:::::::::::.::'~r::':::::: ':::.~':::::.::: ::'.:.::~ l:":.':::: .::::.g,:C:::.:::::::.:.~:l'::: .:.::: ::::~J":: : .j:.6:
.~A qti?el}~hQtt~~r A.n.im~J~........L...". ........ .Q[..h.... ,,,,,,' ..[... . ..... ",.l.."" ..........l........ ......,[, """,,,,,,,,,,,, 1... ........ .....L. """" "l.. .. . .... .. ~'''''''''''' ..... i. "h.. "''''''h~ .m""....... ..l..." . .." 9.
f~t;~ii~~;~.j.......m.....!i.......... ....;. ........ .... mi.................!....... ....~j ........-1..... ...........i....................i.................... i.................j...................~..l
.
.
.
MINUTES
I
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washin~ton 98362
January 23,2002
Regular Meetihg
7:00 p.m.
Vice Chair Schramm opened the meeting at 7:10 pm without a quorum present.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Bob Philpott, LinCia Nutter, Chuck Schramm, Fred Norton
Fred Hewins, RJk Porter, and Mary Craver
Members Excused:
Staff Present:
Brad Collins
Public Present:
Jack Anderson, Eileen Knight, Jerry White, Bob McCrorie
APPROV AL OF MINUTES
Minutes of January 9, 2002, were continued to the next meeting when a quorum could be
present.
WORK SESSION ITEM:
Proposed 2002 Comprehensive Plan: Publie input and review of major projects being
proposed for the 2002 Port Angeles Comprehe~sive Plan.
Director Collins reviewed the latest slaffrepoL that reorganized major projects proposed
to be accomplished in the next five years. The new list identified the projects by four focus areas:
Rayonier (east of Downtown), Downtown, Harbor (westnorth of Downtown), and Citywide (outside
the Harbor Planning Area). The staff report includea a matrix that identified these projects by
schedule year and public resource funding level priority as well as by focus area. Finally, the staff
report provided a draft, new industrial zone that was int~nded to address land use and cleanup issues
regarding the Rayonier area and possibly other harbor lareas.
Commissioner Nutter joined the meeting at 7116 pm.
I
Jack Anderson, a Rayonier representative, made a statement (written statement in the file)
regarding Rayonier's redevelopment status and the prdposed new industrial marine zone.
Commissioner Philpott inquired about the ticling for reuse ofthe Rayonier site.
Commissioner Norton suggested that different cleanup standards could be used in different
areas of the site, ifmixed use was planned.
Commissioner Schramm requested information about the cost differentiation between
I
restricted and umestricted cleanup standards. I
Commissioner Nutter requested examples o{ commercial uses not allowed in restricted
cleanup areas. i
245 I
I
I
Plannmg CommISSIon Mmutes
January 23. 2002
Page 2
Mr. Anderson provided information in regards to the above questions and suggestions.
Eileen Knight, a Port Angeles Downtown Association representative, made a statement
about the P ADA's Design Committee guidelines, giving an example oflntemational Gateway design
elements.
Commissioner Norton asked what picture of downtown would Ms. Knight like in 5 years?
Ms. Knight responded that she would like it to be more cleaned up, have a more historic
look - noting that restoration is expensive, and have a better aesthetic impact.
Commissioner Norton asked what Ms. Knight thought of the aesthetics of the Oak Street
pilings.
Commissioner Nutter inquired about whether or not to include Design Review in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Jerry White, a downtown business/property owner, made a statement in support of design
review for the historic look. Mr. White repeated the suggestion that the City come up with money
to support private renovation (restoration). He stated that he was waiting for the conference center
to happen before he would remodel the upstairs of his building.
Bob McCrorie, another downtown business/property owner, said that he was also planning
a major remodel and would like advice on how to get support in the Comp Plan and that he also
supports an historic look for downtown and the conference center on the Oak Street property.
Director Collins gave a brief status report on the Port's projects, including the Oak Street
conference center proposal.
Commissioner Nutter requested a copy ofthe Port's feasibility study suggested by Leonard
Beil at the last Comp Plan meeting (11/29/01). Ms. Nutter expressed concern about the Elwha
Landing impact on public access and parking with a lot of shoreline (1600 feet) taken away. She
would like the Planning Commission to address the by-pass route designation, the Race Street truck
route, and the traffic downtown.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None.
STAFF REPORTS
Director Collins noted Sue Roberds promotion to Assistant Planner was complete and again
that interviews for the Associate Planner position will be conducted on February 4, 2002. The
Planning Commission was reminded ofthe January 30, 2002, special workshop on the Municipal
Code Amendments at 5:30 pm and were asked to pick up the staff report on Monday January 28,
2002.
246
.
.
.
.
.
.
Plannzng CommiSSIOn Minutes
January 23, 2002
Page 3
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
Commissioner Nutter noted that there were
management including a Saturday March 16 11 :00 am
3 Cities Planning Commissions. Ms. Nutter stated that
at stormwater mangement, State/Federal requirements,
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
Brad Collins, Secretary
PREPARED BY: B. Collins
247
meetings coming up on stormwater
3:00 pm joint meeting of the County and
Planning Commissions would be looking
what the City is doing about them.
Linda Nutter, Chair
.
.
.
248
.
l'
rrgeles
ecreution
.
PORT ANGELES SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER
I
.
249
PARKS & RECREATION REVENUE
REVENUE-GENERAL FuNo
Ocean View Cemetery
William Shore Memorial Pool
Vern Burton Community Center
Senior Services Center - Rentals
Senior Services Center- Kitchen Fees
Senior Services Center - Leases
Banner
Lincoln Park Camping Fees
City Pier Moorage Fees
General Fund Revenue Total
L1NdOLN PARK ' ,
IMPROVE,MENl: FLJf~o. ,
Longhouse/Clubhouse
Lincoln Park Camping Fees
Improvement Fund Total
REVENUE -" " , " , ,
RECREATIONAL ACtlVITJES ,-
FUND " ,: :'" \/
Vern Burton Kitchen Fees
Co-Rec Volleyball
Volleyball Tourney Fund
Slowpitch
Slowpitch Tourney Fund
Mens Basketball
Basketball Tourney Fund
Youth Programs
Adult Programs
Adult Soccer
Recreation Activities Fund Total
January 2002
This Month
$9,779.14
$12,950.04
$4,069.00
$982.50
$180.00
$550.00
$180.00
$0.00
$0.00
$28,690.68
this Month
$600.00
$0.00
$600.00
this 'Month '",'
$465.00
$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,245.00
$457.00
$4,355.50
$836.25
$0.00
$7,364.25
250
This Month
Last Year
$5,984.17
$13,094.43
$608.00
$660.00
$80.00
$550.00
$765.00
$0.00
$0.00
$21,742.10
This Month
Last ye~r
$495.00
$0.00
$495.00
This Month
\a,8t Year
$80.00
$310.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,130.00
$158.00
$3,076.00
$3,577.00
$0.00
$6,424.50
This Year
To Date
this Year
To Date
, , This Ye'ar
, To'Date','
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
.$
$
$
Last Year
To Date
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Last Year To
Date
$
$
$
$
La'st Year
" 10 Date
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$0.
.
.
.
, ) ,
OCEAN VIEW CEMETERY
I '
REVENUE
January 20~2
I
, .",
THIS MONTH I, TIDS'MONTH "
, THIS MONTH' , IHIS MONTH
2002 2001 I 2000 ' 1999'
$ 9,779.14 $ 5,984.17 $ I 8,574.45 $ 17,511.61
$
~ " l r" '
:,' 'REVENUE YEAR to 'DAl1E ' ,,'
" ",', ,'< ",', "" ,';""", " "I ",,' ,
'2ci02':'~"": ! '",y :1ci()l~; ,,' ,:: I '2000"""
" ' ><
9,779.14 $ 5,984.17 $ I 8,574.45 $
17,511.61
-r9~?
^ " ',' ~,
PROPERTV SM,ES ' ,
"
I', /
, , tHIs MONm "
THIS ,MONTH YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE,
I
, , 2002 2002 I 2001 200l
, I ' ,
7 7 I 1 1
, I
INTERMENtS,' 2002, 2001 2000 1999
, , I "
Ground Burials I 2
B 3 3
I
Ground Burial Inumments b 0 1 2
1
Niche Inumments 11 4 0 0
I
Entombments 10 0 0 0
I
I Year to Date Totals I 14 I 6 I 4 I 5 I
I
I " ' 'PRE;NEED SALES !
" ' j "
I
THIS MONTH THIS YEAR 1fHIS MONTH LAST YEAR
TO DATE I LAST YEAR TO DATE
I
$1,782.50 $1,782.50 I $984.62 $984.62
I
I
I
I
251
Parks & Cemetery
Monthly Division Report
January 2002
Accomplishments
Turf Management
111" Mowing and trimming ALL locations ........ .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. ...... ...... .... .. .. .. ........ ........ .... .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. 46.0 hours
Turf renovation/Repairs .. .. .. .. ........ ............ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ........ .. ...... .... .. ...... .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. 0.0 hours
III" Equipment repairs and maintenance .. .... ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... .............. .. ...... .. .. .. ........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 142.5 hours
Total Hours Previous Year: 206.5 Total Hours Current Year: 188.5
Beautification
1111" Downtown planter maintenance(cleanup water etc.) ....................................... 62.0 hours
1111" Maintenance of planted areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 31.5 hours
1111" Greenhouse, plant maintenance .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 48.5 hours
1111" Tree well cleaning and maintenance ................................................... 11.5 hours
Total Hours Previous Year: 70.0
Total Hours Current Year: 153.5
Amenities
1111" Pier general maintenance .. .. .. .. .. .. ........ .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. 4.5 hours
1111" Floats; repairs to Ediz Hook Floats. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40.5 hours
III" Washroom servicing, cleaning and general maintenance .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. ...... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 65.0 hours
1111" Park sign maintenance .. .. .. .. .. ........ .. .. ...... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .......... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8.5 hours
111" Play equipment maintenance: ...... ........ .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .... .. .. ........ .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1.0 hours
1111" Other: Fences, Pier Octopus planting, ponds and fountain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29.0 hours
Total Hours Previous Year: 274.5 Total Hours Current Year: 148.5
.
252
I
Sports Facilities
Field Makeup and M~intenance
I
I
1111. Baseball and softball including; Civic, Lincoln, Volunteer, Dry Creek, Shane
and Elks fields ..................................................................... 0.0 hours
1111. Soccer fields ....................................................................... 0.0 hours
1111. Football field. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 0.0 hours
1111. Tennis ............................................................................ 0.0 hours
1111. Field lighting repairs ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 0.0 hours
Total Hours Previous Year: 0.0 I Total Hours Current Year: 0.0
I
I
Waterfront ITrail
Jill. Bench and memorial installations/maintenance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 253.0 hours
Total Hours Previous Year: 6.5 I Total Hours Current Year: 253.0
I
Building MainJtenance
General Maintenanc~ and Repairs
I
1111. William Shore Pool .............................. .................................59.0 hours
111-' Vem Burton Community Center. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. ............................. .95.0 hours
111-' City Hall and Police Dept.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .............................. 154.5 hours
111-' Senior Center. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .128.5 hours
Total Hours Previous Year: 440.0
Total Hours Current Year:
437.0
.
Civic ComJplex
City Hall mowing, atrium ~nd planted areas
I
Jill. Atrium; tree and flower bed maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . .[. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61.0 hours
Total Hours Previous Year: 27.0 I Total Hours Current Year: 61.0
253
Parks General Maintenance
111I. Litter pickup from various park locations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .93.0 hours
11I1. Park improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4.0 hours
III" Building maintenance;. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .......................................45.0 hours
III" Forest Management;. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 82.0 hours
Total Hours Previous Year: 502.5
Total Hours Current Year:
224.0
Special Events
1111. Other: . .... .. .. ...... .. .... .. .. .... .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. .. .. .... .... .... .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. ...... .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. 14.0 hours
III"
Total Hours Previous Year: 36.0 Total Hours Current Year: 14.0
Campground
1111. Site cleaning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.0.
1111.
Total Hours Previous Year: 0.0 Total Hours Current Year: 0.0
Cemetery
III.. Ground burial interments .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .......... .. .... .. .. ...... .... .. .... .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 49.0 hours
III" Cremation interments .. .. .... .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. ...... .. .. .. ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0.0 hours
1111. Crypt entombment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .... .. .. .. . .. ...... .. ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . 0.0 hours
1111. Niche inumments .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .... . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1.0 hours
11I1. Memorial marker settings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.0 hours
11I1. Mowing and trimming .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 9.0 hours
1111. Building/Chapel cleaning and maintenance .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .... .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . 13.0 hours
1111. Grave site refilling/regrading .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . f . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75.0 hours
1111. Customer Service . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . f , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.0 hours
Total Hours Previous Year: 82.5 Total Hours Current Year: 154.0
.
254
Parks Admini~tration
I
Daily supervision, crew training and safety meetings .... J1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .248.0 hours
Total Hours Previous Year: 224.0 I Total Hours Current Year: 248.0
I
Sub Total Hrs Previous Year: 1,876.5 I Sub Total Hrs Current Year: 1,881.5
I
NON Productive Hrs previous year: 443.0 I NON Productive Hrs Current Year: 363.5
(Illnesses, doctor/dental, vacations) I I \ (Illnesses, doctor/dental, vacations)
I
Total Parks & Cemetery Division Hours:
I
Previous Year: 2,319.5 I
Current Year: 2,245.0
.
.
255
Ediz Hook Volunteer Mr. Don Walker- Monthly Report
The following is a report for the month of January, from Volunteer Mr. Don Walker of Port Angeles (one Ofth.
many citizens who provide the city with many hours of valuable volunteer labor). Mr. Walker has for the last
several years volunteered to maintain the "sign" (and immediate area) on the East side ofthe Ediz Hook restrooms.
Mr. Walker has constructed several wind vanes that you see on top of the Army Corps Reclamation sign, as well as
beautified the area underneath it by installing flowers in a planter area. The following is a summary of his monthly
activities;
.
1/4
Cut 3/4" square wood strips for frames ofrest room signs.
.
1/6
Primed and painted assembled frames fro rest rooms.
.
1/8
Installed frames at rest rooms for "Men", "women" and "Rest rooms." Removed handicap
symbol plaque.
.
1/9
Repainted handicap symbol plaque. Remounted plaque and direction arrow and took picture.
Liquid fertilizer on flowers at sign.
.
1/21
Liquid fertilizer on flowers at sign.
Gathered approximately 8 reddish/gray rocks from beach and added to existing rocks behind
sign at revetment boulders.
.
1/31
Liquid fertilizer on flowers and picked off dead leaves. Gathered about 5 more rocks (4100
lbs. each) and laid at revetment wall.
Note: No sign of any damage or vandalism around rest room and Ediz Hook sign this
month. Pictures taken in November included with report.
.
256
.
New "Restrooms., "Women", "Men" and "Handicapped" letters and frames
mounted on outside restroom parti~ions 11/30/01, 12/28/01 and 1/8/02.
Also Handicap symbol and arrow o~ 1/8/02. Picture taken 1/9/02
.
.
Damaged
sign by
. I
Orca Whale w1nd vane. Was
I
Herron on 9/4/01 and t~ken
found laying on ground at Ed1z Hook
to greenhouse for storage. Also 3/4"
___ ____...::1.._ -.,.......,.......\-,.1....
.
One pink cabbage missing - far east end of flower bed.
Replaced on 11/5/01
Found one pink cabbage misSl~er 1/1/01
.
.
. Total Monthly Maintenarlce Hours January 2002
I
.
~ #1 Turf Management 188.5 hrs.
I #3 Amenities 148.5 hrs.
I #5 Waterfront Trail 253 hrs.
I #7 Civic Complex 61 hrs.
I #9 Special Events 14 hrs.
I #11 Cemetery 154 hrs.
~ # 13 Time Loss 363.5 hrs.
I #2 Beautification 153.5 hrs
I #4 Sports Facilities 0 hrs.
I #6 Building Maintenance 437 hrs.
I #8 Parks General Maintenance 224 hrs.
I #10 Campground 0 hrs.
I # 12 Parks Administration 248 hrs.
.
259
Date
January 12
January 12
January 19
January 2 1
January 25
Janua 26
.
Vern Burton Community Center Main Hall Events
January attendance: 1,345
Event
50
20
225
400
200
450
Attendan
ce
Elks Hoop Shoot
Hildebrand Birthday Party
Martin Luther King Basketball Tournament
Martin Luther King Day - Amen-Corps/Recreation Sponsored
Middle School Dance
Life Way Ph sic Expo
Regular Vern Burton Gym Users
January attendance: 620
Noon Basketball . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 After School Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260
Gym Walker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Date
January 2
January 8-9
January 1 0
January 11
January 1 2
January 16
January 21
January 22
January 22
January 24
January 26
January 28
Janua 29
Vern Burton Meeting Room Events
January attendance: 546
.
Event
Attendanc
e
Clallam County Food Handlers
55 Alive Defensive Driving Class
Elwha Management Team
Life Lme Screening
Hildebrand Birthday
Jefferson School Book Fair
Martin Luther King Day - Amen-Corps/Recreation Sponsored
Clallam County Food Handlers
Dept of Fish & Wildlife
Elwha Management Team
Ski Team Meeting
Round Up Meeting
Clallam County Food Handlers
36
54
26
50
14
120
100
36
20
30
12
12
36
Vern Burton Meeting Room - Regular Users
January attendance: 720
Kiwanis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 Land Trust . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Transit UnIon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Juan de Fuca Festival . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Board of Appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Non-motorized Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Bike Club . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 After School program . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Cal Ripken Youth Baseball . . . 20 SWim Club . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Park Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Ski Club . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Soccer Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Port Angeles Basketball . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
.
260
.
.
.
City Hall Council Chambers - Users
January attendance: 527
City Council Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 DUI Victim's Panel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Board of Adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Historical Society Lecture . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Clallam County Workshops . . . . . . . . . 200
Education Foundation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Department of Labor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Port Angeles Fire Dept . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Building Association. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Gateway City/Transit . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 Park Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Software Demos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 School District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Park & Facility Rentals
Venue December Year to Date Monthly uses
Clubhouse 2 2 Scouts: Each Wednesday
Longhouse 0 0 No monthly uses scheduled
Loomis Building 5 5 4-H }SI & 41h Tues
Scouts: 3rd Tuesday
Fly Fishermen' 1 SI Monday
Lions Park 0 0 No monthly uses scheduled
Veterans Park } I Veterans Program Last Friday
Conrad Dyar Fountain 0 0 No monthly uses scheduled
Scheduled City pier Uses This Month: 0 Year to Date: 0
Date I Event
I i Nothing Scheduled I
!Date Up Coming Pier Uses/Events I
I Event
I i Nothing Scheduled I
Recreation Division Programs
Square Dance Lessons
35 enrolled
25 enrolled
35 participants
Line Dance Lessons .................
2 1 participants
45 enrolled
Country Western Dance Class .........
After School Program:
Frankhn School . . .
Vern Burton Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
261
Parks & Recreation Special Events
January) 9-20 Martin Luther King Basketball Tournament
40 teams; 32 out-of-town
January 2 ) Martin Luther King Kid's Day. Americorp & City Co-sponsor
450 participants
.
Upcoming Recreation Programs
Date Event
February I "Teacher Day" - Day Camp Program for kids ages 5- ) 2
February I 6. I 7 PresIdents' Day Tournament
February ) 9 "Snow Day" - Day Camp program for kids ages 5.12
March 9- I 0 Spnng Hoopfest
March 23.24 Men's Washington Recreation Basketball Federation State Tournament
April 1.5 "Spring Break" . Day Camp Program for kids ages 5-12
April 6-7 April Fool's Boys & Girls, 5th. Varsity Basketball Tournament
Miscellaneous
Weekly Elementary & Middle School Gym & Field Scheduling for: Soccer, Youth Basketball
.
Martin Luther King Day
Parachute Play
.
262
.
William Shore Pool Activities
January 2002
ADMINISTRA TION
*Merchant Marine Water Training
*Swim Lessons for ages 3 years to adults
*Conducted Monthly In-Service Training Class for Pool Staff
*Beginning January 1, Pool is open on Sunday for rentals only
INSTRUCTIONAL
Exercise classes for September:
* Water Aerobics AM classes
* Deep Water AM classes
Deep Water PM classes
* Water Walking AM classes
Man - Fri
Man & Fri
Tu & Thur
Man, Wed, Fri
Swim Lessons Schedule:
* January 14 - February 15
* January 15 - February 14
* On-going
Grade-school
Pre-school
Private Lessons
. CLUBS AND ORGANIZA TlONS
.
* Port Angeles Swim Club
5:30-7:00 pm Monday thru Friday
* Port Angeles Diving Club
On vacation
* Port Angeles School District
7:45 am - 8:15 am
9:05 am - 9:35 am
1:00 pm -1:30 pm
3:00 pm - 5:00 pm
PE Classes
PE Classes
Special Education Class
Boys Swim Team
Man, Tues, Thurs, Fri
Wednesday
Monday thru Friday
Monday thru Friday
January 8 & 10
Home Swim Meets
* United States Coast Guard
7:45 - 9:00 am Rescue Swimmer Training Tues & Thurs --
--
__~ ~H
RECREA TlONAL SWIMMING
January 26 Kid's Day
January 26 Middle School Night
22 Participants
13 Participants
_.~. "'_"""""""""""~ ~!:""'..~~l....-~ ~~
~~Jt~"'<d ~~ ~
263
William Shore Memorial Pool
Monthly Attendance/Revenue Report
January 2002
.
RECREA TION---
Children
Adult
Middle School Nite/Kid's Day
Pool Parties/Participants
561
1,937
13/22
21/213
1,019
2,269
31/31
19/233
INSTRUCTION ---
Children
Adults
Parent/Child Orientation
Pre-School
Water Exercise
School District
Pool Rentals/Classes
628
o
o
338
688
1,019
944
3,617
"i~!~-; ~<f>' if(<
,B@E)
k .?>M>. <}-> <',~
POOL OPERATIONS ---
Days Open
Hours Open
REVENUE ---
29
418.75
Rental: Suits, towels, caps
Admissions
Lessons
Aerobics
Passes
Showers
Lockers
Pool Rentals
Sales Tax
~~"d~e:t:rR6\:l,~I~.Uff~t;:t€))~~ "
^"'~ , 0 ,..", "", '-"" 4"'....."">oI'l' ;,,~< <"" ....~'mAA~...,,"of. #<<
171.28
1,603.99
5,518.50
1,501.50
2,403.26
8.34
78.75
1,222.13
571
o
o
146
664
1,035
397
2,813
30
420.00
336.08
2,527.48
4,908.00
1,747.00
1,929.61
6.94
189.50
978.16
471.66
>~ "v~.,...:q,~<::f .?:....-\;'./~1iN;;: ;:11~'<-~:~i!i1.~""("'''-:-,>%;-''1 ~'itc:?' ,A~^~~~l
1>2'"95o.;O~'!1: %:~f' tir1::30J09ifflfa,
0' H'<' '&'~ yO-- :,.' "'~y^" '<<.'1&4 v ..'^h~,,)<. "" ,~, "'".+ <>i>" ~,< ~.;.
.
.
.
Senior Center Community Events
Date
Events
January 1 2
January 15
January 19
January 19
January 26
Janua 26
Clallam County Democratic Committee
Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife
P.E.O.
Private Party
Financial Seminar
Memorial Service
y
I Regular Senior Center Users !
. Senior Nutrition Board .CCSWAB
.Soroptimist Jet-set Virginia Mason
. Fine Arts Center Venture Club
.Rhody Society Board Meeting .Non Motorized Meeting
. Eckankar .Jazzercise
.Peninsula College
Senior Center Sponsored Events & Programs
Date
Event
January 1
January 4
January 9
January 1 1
January 12
January 16
January 30
January 31
Senior SWingers New Years Day Dinner and Dance
New Year, New You Demonstration
Collett Vacations Presentation
Breakfast Served
Lounge Volunteers Meeting
Creating Scrapbook Albums, Lisa McMillian
Manners Spring Training final planning
Dungeness Jazz Band
Senior Center sponsored Health Programs
.Weight Training/Stretch .Aeroblcs
Alzheimer Support Group .Tai Chi
.Low Vision Support Group .Foot Care
.Bench Stepping . Chair Exercise
. Hearing Aid Repalrs/Testing .Yoga
.Blood Pressure Check .Flbromyalgia Support Group
265
Senior Center sponsored Educational Programs
.Round Table on Politics
.Computer Classes
.Spring Chicken Band
.Investment Group
. Conversational Spanish
. Tap Dance Classes
Creative Writing
. Drawing
.Infinite variety of Music
. Harmomca Lessons
.Italian
computer lab
.Water Color Class
. Oil painting
.Investment Class
Senior Center Sponsored Social & Recreational Programs
.Senior SWingers Dance pickle ball
.Bridge Golden Agers Club
.Paint on Your Own Pool
Olympic Pemnsula Chess Club . Canasta
.At the Movies. Monday video . Cribbage
.Pinochle . Coffee Lounge
Bingo Senior Minute Committee
. Crafts .The Old MUSIC Guy
266
.
.
.
PORT ANGELES SENIOR CENTER
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
January 2002
~;;;~ff:~:~4:~~~~(>~~~ft~~;~~r
: ^~C1f,IX7;I~Y ; "i '" "
4t:?-tf,~,''::f)~.~~)-:: X'ih.f
~2Pc;>>i:RW1G'1 c
~~" ,,' ....<"~-:;1~)~ ~ ~ .' .>
Hours
1,865 1,993
5,091 5,245
568 624
987 536
1,592 1,165
0 0
0 0
151 144
1,928 1 ,459
1,130 1,168
761 789
369 379
Information & Referral
Estimated Attendance
Health Programs
Education Programs
Social/E vents/Prog rams/Meals
Trips: Taken
Passengers
Volunteers:
Membership:
City
County
267
I
1
I
2001 ACTIVITY SUMMARY
I
SENIOR SERVICES COMMUNITY CENTER
1. Other Building 1 Jsers
* 12 No Fee * 31 Non-Profit
* 30 Profit
2. Program Highlights
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
.*
*
Increased membership, attendance, volunteers, information & assistance by 9%
Second year of offering Senior Coupon Book to members
Offered 30 special programs covering a wide variety of subjects
Co-sponsored 39 special programs with non-profit and profit agencies
Opened Computer Lab. In six months offered 33 classes and a total 1250 people signed in
390 volunteers provided an estimated 21,239 hours of servi,ce to the center
Honored volunteers with a lunch, pre.sented certificates for first time in many years
Provided a food booth at Rotary Garden Show
Co-sponsored 5th annual Senior Artist Show with Clallam Art League
Participated in 8th Annual National Health & Fitness Day
Sent two teams to 12th annual Senior Wellness Conference in Seaside, Oregon
Held the 18th Annual Members Fall Flea Market & 4th Spring Flea Market
Sponsored 31 st Annual Grannie's Pie Shack fund raiser at Angeles Arts-in-Action
3. Center Improvements
* Refmished multi-purpose room floor
* Remodeled lounge for safety and space
* Totally furnished and equipped computer lab
* Professionally cleaned all upholstered furniture and recovered card room chair seats
* Placed donated garden fountain in lobby
(
\
4. Community Involvement
* Donated a days lounge receipts to United Way Restaurant Days & Peninsula Home Fund
* Girl Scout Troop provided vacuum car service at center
* Center represented and participated in wellness and promotional events for seniors
* Sponsored Little League T'Ball Team (11 th year)
* Senior Singers entertain monthly at 2 nursing homes, Adult Action and Foster Homes
* Provided van use for three community groups
* Spring Chickens Center Band hosted Christmas Concert proceeds to Food Bank
* On-going "Pennies.for Lincoln" collecti.on point for Clallam County Museum
* Collection point for Food Bank and Toys for Tots
* Host Clallam County Senior Providers monthly breakfast
* Continue to work with Radio KONP that airs Senior Minute radio spots.
* Washington State Association of Senior Centers awarded the 2001 Professional Award to
Radio Pacific for providing the Senior Minute
* Work site for Juvenile Diversion and City Community Service workers
* Coordinate with Jim's Pharmacy as a site to offer Community Flu Shots
* For first time, a site for Puget Sound Blood Bank mini blood drive
5. School Participation
* Hosted, coordinated and obtained sponsors for 3rd annual Middle School Spelling Bee
expanded to include all Clallam County schools
* Continue to work with Peninsula College for Older Adult Continuing Education Courses
* Co-sponsored 4th annual dance exch<iJl>~ith Peninsula College students at the Center
* Promote and encourage volunteering at sctIools
* 'Prnmntp. ane! Sllnnort Foster Grandnarents ProQfam in schools
,:,
.
~...,
~
~ORT ANGELES
CITY OF
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
,0'
" I > ,
March 3, 2002
Mr. Phil Anderson
Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife
600 Capital Way North
Olympia, W A 98501-1091
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Since the mid 1990's, Port Angeles has pro-actively acknowledged the need to restructure
and preserve the State's salmon resource. However, in recent years, our community and
all of Marine Area #6 has shouldered a comparatively significant amount of the
contribution toward the responsible conservation and restoration of salmon for
Washington's inland waters. As a result, our area has realized more fishing restrictions
and closures than any other region. Absorbing the bulk of the responsibility in this regard
has resulted in obvious economic hardship upon our area's motels, marina's, restaurants,
recreation facilities and other local businesses.
While Port Angeles asks for no distinctive nor special consideration, our community is
compelled to express a growing concern that the conservation burden in Marine Area #6
has been excessive when compared to other neighboring areas. Specifically, we note that
during the 2001 season, Marine Areas# 5 and #7 were allowed a summer Chinook fishery,
and that Marine Area #5 was allowed a non-selective Coho fishery. Marine Area #6 did
not receive these benefits. We further note that Marine Area #6 has had at least 30 fewer
days salmon fishing, in primary waters, than any other area of the State.
,-
~,
f<!:
J
While the City of Port Angeles does not seek preferential treatment, we do seek parity
with our neighboring areas, and we believe that we are justified in requesting that Marine
Area #6 have salmon fishing opportunities that are equal to those of Marine Areas #5 &
#7.
t~:
,
~- ;
, ':
~~
l-
321 EAST FI FTH STREET · POBOX 1 150 · PORT ANGELES, WA 98362-0217
PHONE 360-417-4500. FAX 360-417-4509. TTY 360-417-4645
E-MAIL CITYMGR@CI PORT-ANGELES WA US
r.
~.
v
, .
Salmon 2002 - Fish & Wildlife
Page 2
On behalf of the citizen~ and businesses of Port Angeles, the City of Port Angeles'
respectfully requests that the 2002 salmon regulations for Marine Area #6 reflect
adjustments as outlined on the attachment. '
Yours truly, ,/ ,-,
~/7v4~~-'-
- Glenn Wiggins, Mayor '
Attachment
cc: Mr. Pat Patillo"W A State Dept. Fish & Wildlife,
Mr. Dick Geist, W A State Dept. Fish,& Wildlife
:port Angeles C~ty, Council
Clallam County Economic Development Council
Port Angeles Chamber of Commerce
Congressman Norm Dicks
Sen~tor Jim Hargrove
Representative Jim Buck
Representative Lynn Kessler
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
REQUESTED ADJUSTMENTS FOR MARINE AREA #6
2002 SALMON SEASON
* COHO SEASON tHE SAME AS 2001 EXCEPT.' NON-
SELECTIVE RETENTION IN SEPTEMBER. ,-
* LIMITED (QUOTA-BASED) CHINOOK FISHER'Y IN JULY.
/
,
_ C/1'7 C(J{/#C-C.t.,
,- fJI4n/N/~ (b,q'lIS..r/~A/
_ 2 c!J/l//o/ t?CJ.4~ d &1 #ut/.s/'#/f',lf/r-
- J-nIJ Land Use Training
City of Port Angeles
February 20, 2002
Name:
9.
10.~
.F--rvEO ,
11. .
12.
rJU 'Jl-
13. 1< l ,--K. \>~ I2.T€~
14. ~;(/ tv/&-tf!=-/v5
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20. ;; I
21.
Sign-In Sheet
Entity:
./
qJ t:-/;;>>>3c/E2...
c' 1..1
0")
.
.
.
.
,
THE CONDUCT OF GOVERiVMENT SHOULD ALWAYS
BE SCRUPULOUSL Y JUSTfJV DEALING WITH ITS
CITIZENS; . . . -
-~-~~-----~-------~ ----~----- --- -- ----~---~---- ----- ----- --~-----~-------~---,---~----- - -----
Stat!': ~x. Rei Shannon v Soonburw.
66W:;JI35,P 143(1965)
.
HIGH-RISK DECISION-MAKING:
SO "VHA T?
I. Exposure to the City
,. Invalidate City's Decision
,. ~foney Damages Against the City
,. Attorney Fees and Costs Imposed
,. Bind the City
II. Personal Exposure
,. Named as a Defendant
,. Key Witness at Trial
>- Witness Against Employer (City)
~ Possible Un-Insured Personal Claims
III. Expensive
,. Document Intensive
>- Extensive Legal Discovery
>- Vigorously Litigated
>- Potentially Big SSS at Stake
~ Uses Valuable Officer and Personnel Time
~ Attorney Fees and Costs
IV. Politically Damaging
~ Emotional
,. Personalized
~ Politically Nfotivated
~ Bad P.R. for City
- ---V.- --St-a-te-\Vi-ee---R-a-m-i-fica-tiyns----------- -- ---- ----
>- 1tfake Bad Law
VI. Undermines Public Confidence in Government
> Perception of Incompetence
,. Perception of Political "Agenda"
:
"
'WH.ERE'S THE RISK?
TYPE OF ACTION
Legislative v. Quasi-J udicial v. l"Iinisterial
>- Quasi-Judicial Cv~ery High Risk)
>- Legislative (Low Risk)
>- NIinisterial (Low Risk)
II. City Council v. Planning Commission v. Board
of Adjustment v. Design Review Boards v.
Hearing Examiner v. Staff
1.
DECISION i\L-\KER
OECISION
,. City Council ( Very High Risk)
, Design Review Board (High Risk)
, Planning Commission ().IIoderate Risk)
>- Board of Adjustment (t\loderate Risk)
,. Hearing: Examiner (Very Lo\\ Risk)
>- Staff ( Very Low Risk)
III. Recommendation "'. Final or Appeal
>- Recommendation (Low Risk)
>- Final or Appeal (High Risk)
I"~. All High Risks:
RISK-INDUCING
ACTIONS
>- Playing Politics vVith Quasi-Judicial
Applications
,. NIeddlinQ in the Province of Staff
~
, Arbitrary and Capricious Decision Making
,. r.Iis-Applying the Law
, Ignoring the Law
.... ~
CITY EXISTENCE
v. Existing City v. Newly Incorporated
,. Nevv'ly Incorporated (Very High Risk)
, Existing City (Lo\ver Risk)
HIGH RISK LAND USE ACTIONS
>- Assurances/representations 0 f: (1) utility service or capacity: (2)
zoning boundaries/restrictions: (3) boundaries of sensitive areas,
- ~ .
historic districts or "o\"erlay districts": or (4) property boundaries
or utility lines.
>- Causes of nahlral disasters. such as landslides. floods. erosion.
fallen trees: building collapse. etc.
>- Zoning, regulation and permitting/licensing of: ( I) adult
entertainment businesses: (2) group homes: (3) alcohol, dnlg
rehabilitation facilities: (-t.) \\ ork release facilities: (5) sexual
predator release facilities: (6) assisted care facilities: and (7)
gambling casinos/card rooms.
~ ~
>- Approvals for large and: or controversial and/or politically sensitive
projects like: (1) shopping centers: (:2) strip nlalls: (3) large
subdivisions: (4) essential public facilities; (5) environmentally or
historically sensitive projects: (6) mobile homes/mobile home
parks; and (7) "big box" commercial projects.
>- Ignoring or violating vested rights.
....... '-"' ~ '-"
>- Adoption of and. or implementation of moratoria.
>- Regul;;ttion and/or p~rmitting of cellular/telecomnlLmication
facilities.
>- Failure to plan for utility capacity, service and infrastnlcture.
>- Off-site development nlitigation requirements.
The BIG Rules
(General Rules for ;Ylunicipal Decision tvlaking)
1. Follo\v your code and state law.
2. Don't \vaive code requirements or standards.
3. Treat all classes of permit applicants equally and consistently.
4. Don't promise. guarantee or assure results or approvals.
5. Recognize and enforce vested rights.
~ ~
6. Correct your code, zoning and regulatory problems legislative!.v.
7. Don't delay decisions or pem1its/approvals (120-day nlle).
8. Don't encourage organizations or groups to support or oppose projects.
9. Don't do the applicant's job:
, Don't design project or assist in design.
,. Don't reconunend "what \vill flv".
.I
>- Don't loan services. SSS. or equipment.
10. Clean up your code (Legislatively).
>- No ambiguities or undefined terms.
,. No conflicts.
>- Update to comply with new la\v.
11. Be creative within the law'.
., Developer agreements.
., Allo\v "phasing".
, Creative land design: PUD's. PRD's. clustering. etc.
~ . ~
12. Don't meddle in staffs permit review or decision making.
13. Use Hearing Examiner for final quasi-judicial decisions.
14. Don' t disc lose pri vileged or confidential documents.
15. Seek out and fo llow vour citv attorney's advice.
_ _ J
CITY COUNCIL ROLES IN
LAND USE DECISION-MAKING
~EG ISLA TIVE!
VS.
IQUASI-JUDICIALI
"P 0 1 i cy -Making"
"Jud2:e-like decision"
'-
> Capital improvements
> Comprehensive Plan
> Area-wide planning
> Zoning maps
> Establish development standards
> Adoption of general application
ordinances
> Long-term planning
> General infrastructure
> Plannin~/financin~/
..... .....
extensions
> Annexations
> Contracts
> Subdivision/short plat approvals
> Conditional/special use Qermits
> Site plan approvals
> PUDs/PRDs/PDDs
> Property-specific approvals
> Appeal o( adn1inistrative
decisions
> Variances
>- Shoreline permits
>- Boundary line adjustments -
> Site-specific rczones
LEGISLATIVE DECISION
MAKING
- ., ",
\
_ ,,'I" ~,\~\~
LEGISLA TIVE
DECISION-MAKING
I. Purpose
Policy making, long-term planning, long-tenn budgeting, general, city-wide zoning and
regulation development, creation of development standards and general-application law
-making, based on constituent desires.
II. Indicia
>- Not property specific, applicant specific or project specific
,. General application to all properties or all residents throughout the City
,. Creation of Cite-wide visioning, policies, goals, etc., based on best interests of
community
>- Adoption of ordinances or resolutions for planning, regulation, policy-making, etc.
and general law-making
III. Legal Standard
Decision-maker considers the public health, safety and welfare. Decision guided by
constituent desires and what the decision-maker believes is in the best interests of the
community. Must be rationally related to legitImate public purpose. Very deferential.
IV. NoticefProcess
>
>-
>-
"-
,.
>-
v.
"'-.
,.
,.
"'-
,.
"-
,.
>-
"-
,.
"'-
,.
Public hearing generally required
Council may, but not required to, consider "evidence"
Open Public Meetings Act (RCW Ch. 42.30) ,applies
App~aIa.llce-of-fairnessiRGh. 42:36) docs not apply
No time limit for adoption of legislation
Liability PitfallsfRisks
Notice requirements must be strictly followed
Deliberation done in open public meeting (RCW Ch. 42.30)
No equal prote"ction violation
Taking or "Inverse Condemnation" (over-regulation)
~foratoria
Vague, ambiIDlous, or undefined regulations/standards
Immunity. for .pUrely legislative actions
The BIG Rules
(For Legislative Decision-Nlaking)
1. Follovv your code and state lavv.
2. Ren1ember vested rights; incorporate vesting into
legislation.
'-"
3. All legislation n1ust be: (1) clear; (2) easy to
understand; (3) not vague or ambiguous; and (4)
not in conflict with state or federalla\v.
4. Eliminate internal conflicts in code and conflicts
with state and federalla\v.
~
5. Alllegislatibn must advance: the public health;
welfare; saf€ty; or the fiscal health of the city.
6. Use moratoria sparingly and carefully; must
proteCt vestecl rignts.
7. Provide for administrative appeals of quasi-
fudicial actions.
8. Legislation must not in1pair public or private
contracts.
9. Request and follovv city attorney advice.
QUASI-JUDICIAL
DECISION MAKING
..:.:~ --
QUASI-JUDICIAL
DECISION-MAKING
Purpose
"Judge-like" decision making involving a specific party, specific property or specific project to
resolve a "contested" matter. Quasi-judicial means "acting like a judge" in adjudicating the
rights of specific parties on a specific proposal.
II. Indicia
,. A specific applicant or specific property or a specific project at issue
>- Decision impacts specific parties, as opposed to having "area-wide" impact of
general community significance
,. Form is more like hearing or "mini-trial"
,. Decision-makers consider evidence (testimony and exhibits)
,. Results in approval, approval with conditions, or denial
III. Legal Standards
Decision based onfindings of fact, based on evidence in the record of the proceeding, that are
directly related to conclusions as to whether specific criteria in state statute or city ordinance
have been satisfied. Decision must be made on only the criteria in statute or ordinance relating
to particular type of application or decision. Decision will be invalidated if: (A) arbitrary and
pricious; (B) lack of substantial evidence; (C) clearly erroneOllS; or (D) error of law.
IV. NoticelProcess
>- Open Public Meetings Act (RCW Ch. 42.30) applies
>- Appearance of fairness (RCW Ch. 42.36) applies
>- Decision makers cannot pre-judge matter, and must be unbiased.
>- Consider evidence for and against proposal
>- May require swearing in witnesses
>- Make and preserve clear, complete and accurate record of proceedings
>- Render decision in timely manner
>- Always - fmdings of fact and conclusions of law!
V. Liability PitfallslRisks
.,
,. Failure to make sustainable findings/conclusions
,. Violation of appearance of fairness (RCW Ch. 42.36)
,. Violation of Open Public Meetings Act (RCW Ch. 42.30)
,. Failure to give legally sufficient notice of hearing
,. Violation of vested rights
,. Failure to make or preserve good or transcribable record
,. No "visioning", planning or policy-making
>- Not consider constitutions' desires or best interests of community
.
The BIG Rules
(For Quasi-Judicial Decision tvlaking)
1. Follow your code and state law.
2. No policy-making, "visioning" or city goals.
3. Recognize and enforce Vested Rights.
~ ~
4. Consider all of the evidence.
5. Make decisions timely (120-day nIle).
6. Always: Good findings and conclusions.
7. Don't let citizen complaints or community displeasure
influence decision.
8. Use a hearing examiner for all final (or appeal) quasi-
judicial decisions.
. 9. Do not base decisions on "what's good for the
communily" or on "ure-iJest interests ofthe city. II
10. Make sure decisions are based on "substantial evidence"
in the record.
11. Don't promise, guarantee or assure results or decisions.
12. Don't waive code requirements or standards.
13. Treat all classes of permit applicants equally and
consistently.
.,.-,. 1 r 11 _ __ _~.L-. _.4-l.___....,. _....:.1.......:__
ARBITRARY AND
CAPRICIOUS DECISION
MAKING
Blind Luck
ARBITRARY AND
CAPRICIOUS CONDUCT
A decision which is made
willfully and unreasonably,
without consideration and
in disregard of the
facts or circumstances.
.-
EXAMPLES OF
ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS
DECISION MAKING
1. Failing to make findings of fact and conclusions of law for
quasi-judicial decisions.
2. Making quasi-judicial decisions based on political agenda
or motives.
3. Ignoring/not applying the law.
4. Applying the ,vrong la'vv.
5. No evidence in record to support decision.
6. Ignoring evidence or testimony.
7. Imposing standards or requirements not authorized by
statute or code.
8. Waiving standards or requiren1ents of code.
9. Making quasi-judicjal decisions based on the number of
proponents or opponents.
10. Applying legislative policies, goals, or "visioning" when
deciding-qua~-udiciaLap_plications
11. Basing quasi-judicial decisions on community desires,
community displeasure, or public sentiment or complaints.
I
12. tv1aking quasi-judicial decisions based on economic
viability of project.
13. Wrongfully delaying decisions on permits or approvals.
14. Ignoring city attorney advice.
...
PERMITS
IJ IJI'JI) Il,r Ii
I) 'JI1V S
The BIG Rules
(F or Permit Review/Processing/Is?uance)
1. :NIinisterial - NOT discretionary (Once code/statute requirements
met, must issue promptly).
2. Follow strictly ALL statutory and code criteria.
3. DO NOT DELAY - issue promptly (120 day rule).
4. DO NOT interject city councilor politics into administrative
process or decision-making.
5. Ensure that decision-making/issuance is not: (1) unreasonable~ (2)
cost-excessive; or (3) burdensome permit review processes.
t5. No excessive or unreasonable bonding or indemnification
requirements.
7. Decisions must be competitively neutral and applied non-
o discriminatorily.
8. DO NOT condition on: (1) financial viability; (2) technical
ca-~i-~~rtis@; (3) _rerrietary-iH-ferm~er
(4) waiving legal rights.
9. DO NOT get involved in private property agreements, CCR's,
homeo\vner's agreements, etc.
10. Treat all permit applicants equally and consistently.
11. Don't promise, guarantee or assure specific decisions or approvals.
12. Request and follow city attorney advice.
GORILLAS, IN THE
CLOSET
1. Litigation Under the E.Sut\.
, Citizen lawsuits
, "Takings" under Section 9 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 91538(a))
,. Suits challenging regulations/approvals impacting new
listings for salmon
2. Utility Supplies, Infrastructure and Service
,.. \Vater rights and availability
, Capacity to serve new developnlent
~ Infrastructure to serve new" development
,. Environmental regulation (SEPA., SL\ilA) and E.S.A. Issues
impacting both supplies and infrastnlcture
3. Consistency of Zoning and Development
Regulations 'Vith Gl\tIA Comp Plans
>- GiYIA compliance
>- Pre-GivlA' zoning and/or development regulatIons
(Inconsistent with comp plans or Giv[A goals)
>- Internal Inconsistency of Zoning and/or Regulations
4. Siting and Regulation of Essential
(or Controversial) Public Facilities
>- Jails, prisons and other correctional facilities
>- Sevvage and solid waste treatment facilities
);.- Cellular tOVv'ers and telecommunication facilities
>- Drug/Alcohol treatment facilities
>- Group homes
VESTED RIGHTS
I. Purpose
. x the rules that will govern a land use application or project. Provide for certainty. Allow
developer to know in advance \vhat rules/regulations will apply to a project.
II. Applies To:
>- Subdivisions/short plats
,. SEP A determinations
>- Development permits
,. Shoreline permits
>- Planned Unit Developments (PUDs)
>- Conditional Use Permits (CUPs)
III. Not Apply To:
,. Comprehensive plans
>- Written studies/analyses/reports
>- Rezones
IV. Elements
,. 'vVritten application
>- Application is "complete" .
. SubdIvisions/short plats/building permits: fillly complete
. All other applications: substantially complete
. Completeness determined by code
>- Application consistent with existing zoning
V. Regulatory Reform
Permit applications deemed complete oy law 2~ days atter pemut applIcatIon submlttea to City.
RCW 36.708.070. Failure to advise - application is deemed complete.
VI. Effect of Vested Rights
~
>- No discretion to change zoning, development regulations, standards or policies
applicable to project.
,. Applicant can proceed with project under zoning and development
regulations/standards in effect at time of submission of complete applic~tion.
>- If City imposes new zoning, regulations or standards on vested project:
. Fourteenth Amendment Substantive Due Process violation.
. Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Violation
. Violation of Regulatory Refonn Act.
. Possible violation of Ch. 64.40 RCW.
I .
58.17.110. Approval or disapproval of subdivision and dedication-
Factors to be considered-Conditions for approval-
Finding-Release from damages
(1) The city, toVJ'TI, or county legislative body shall inquire into the public
use and interest proposed to be ser;ed by the establishment of the subdivision
and dedication. It shall detennine: (a) If appropriate provisions are made for,
but not limited to, the public health. safety, and general welfare. for open
spaces. drainage ways, street.s or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit
stops, potable water supplies, sanitarj \vastes, parks and recreation, play-
grounds, schools and schoolgrounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts,
including side'.valks - and other planning features that assure safe walking
conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and (b) whether the
public interest v,iIl be served by the subdivision and dedication.
(2) A proposed subdivision and dedication shall not be approved unless the
city, town, or county legislative body makes vtritten findings that: (a) Appro-
priate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare
and for such open spaces. drainage \vays, streets or roads, alleys, other public
ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitar:y wastes. parks and recre-
ation. playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts.
including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe 'walking
conditions for students \vho only walk to and from school; and (b) the public
use and interest ""ill be served by the platting of such subdhision and
dedication. If it finds that the proposed subdivision and dedication make such
appropriate provisions and that the public use and interest ~ill be served, then
the legislative body shall approve the proposed subdivision and dedication.
Dedication of lanrl to any public body, pro\ision of public impro\'ement~ to
serve the subrlivision, and/or impact fees imposed under RC\V 82.02.0GO
th rOll gL82.Q2-Q9D-ma~--he-Leqllired-as-a-co-nd-i-tio-~9f~C;;hl-b~$ i on a pr+~-l.
Dedications shan be clearl.y shnvvTl on the final plat. No rlerlication. prr)vi~ion
of public improvements, or impact fees imposed under Rev\! 82.02.060 through
82.02.090 shall be allo\ved that constitutes an unconstitutional taking of private
property. The legislative body shall not as a condition to the approval of any subdivision require a release from damages to be procured fr0m other
property owners.
FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS
I.
PURPOSE Ensure that the decision-maker has dealt fully and properly with all Issues in the case, ensure the parties
Involved and a reviewing Court are fullv informed as to the reasons for the decision.
-. .
.,
STA;'I/DARD OF REVIEW Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are subject to the same requirement as are
findings and conclusions drawn by a trial court judge.
3.
WHE:\f REQUIRED Any quasi-judicial decision by the final decision-maker. This includes, but is not limited to:
(l) Permit appeals: (2) special use permits: (3) conditIOnal use permits; (4) variances: (5) boundary line adjustments;
(6) site plans: (7) short plats: (8) major plats: (9) site specIfic rezones.
4.
WHICH :\'fA TTERS All matters which establish the eXistence or non-existence of determinative factual matters.
Required to support each crltena for approval, denial or Imposition of conditions.
5.
APPROPRIA TE FINDlNGS & CONCLUSIONS.
A. Thinking process used by the decision-maker should be revealed by Findings and Conclusions.
B. Each finding must be supported by "substantial evidence".
C. Findings must be based on evidence in the record.
D. Findings should be clear. precise and understandable.
E. ConclusIOns should always reference applicable standards, criteria and policIes.
o. NOT LEG ALL Y SUPPORTABLE FINDlNGS.
A. Findings without evidence in the record to support them (information, facts or opinions that were
not presented in testimony or in evidence at the hearmg).
B. Evidence which is speculative, conjectural or based on guesswork.
C. Finding/Conclusions based on a "belief', a "feeling", an "assumption", an "anticipation", etc.
D. Statements of the positions of the parties.
E. Summaries of evidence presented.
F. Findings based on stereotypes or popular prejudices.
G. Findings based on assumption of future non-compliance with imposed conditIons.
H. Findings that a project would "negatively impact" other properties.
I. Facts or conclusIOns WhICh relate to the property owner, rather than to the land itself.
7. DEADLINE TO .\DOPT. By deadline in code or state law. Otherwise, within a "reasonable time".
8. FORM. (1) Separate document. (2) adoption by reference: or (3) in minutes.
MORATORIA: GMAlPLANNING RULES
I. SOURCE OF AUTHORITY
A. RCW 36.70A.390
B. RCW 35.63.200
II. APPLIES TO
A. Moratoria for land use planning
B. Interim zoning map
C. Interim zoning ordinance
D. Interim official land use control
,.
III. NOT APPLY TO
A. Designation of critical areas, agricultural lands,
forest lands, and mineral resource lands (ReW 36.70A.170)
B. Conservation of above-designated lands under RCW 36.70A.060
IV. HEARING
A. Must be held within 60 days of adoption
B. If not before, must adopt findings of fact justifying decision
at/immediately after public hearing
C. Result in an ordinance
v. DURATION
A. Six months
B. Exception -- up to one year if work plan developed with studies
C. May be renewed for one or more six month periods
(with subsequent public hearing and findings)
;
MORATORIA & INTERIM
CONTROL MEASURES
I. AUTHORITY
A. GMAlPlanning-based
1. RCW 36.70A.390 (GMA)
2. RCW 35.63.200 (Planning Moratoria)
B. Common Law (General) based:
1. Matson v. Clark Co., 79 Wn.App. 691 (1995)
2. Swartant v. Spokane, 21 Wn.App. 665 (1978)
3. Humiston v. Meyer's, 61 Wn.2d 772 (1963)
II. PURPOSEIFUNCTION
A. Preserve the status quo
B. Allow for thoughtful planning
Respond to "emergency" situation
C. Safeguard public health, safety and welfare
III. TYPES OF MORATORIA (PLANNED v. DeF ACTO)
A. Planned
1. GMA authorized (RCW 36.70A.390 and .790)
2. Cornmon law (emergency situation)
B. Defacto
1. Concurrency-driven
a. Transportation
b. Utilities (capacity or infrastructure)
2. Incorporation
3. Annexation
MORATORIA: GENERAL RULES
I. BASED ON AN "EMERGENCY"
II. DEFINITION
A. Unforeseen
B. Sudden
C. Unanticipated
III. MUST BE ESTABLISHED THROUGH ORDINANCE
IV. GENERAL RULES
A. Keep narrowly tailored to specific harm
B. Limit duration (1-2 years max)
C. Always adopt through hearing process and ordinance
D. Provide for variances/exemptions for hardship cases
E. Provide process for administrative appeals
V. ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
A. Must contain facts to support an "emergency"
B. Must be necessary for preservation of public peace,
health, safety, welfare.
C. Must have legitimate public purpose
D. Can't be conclusory
VI. EXAMPLES
A. Utility capacity/infrastructure limitations
B. Unforeseen and harsh effects on environment
C. Development would violate GMA planning goals or concurrency
D. Act of God disasters/emergencies
E. Emergency financial damage to city
F. Development or regulatory restrictions (orders) from
state government/agency (DOE, DOT, DOH)
G. Unforeseen adverse impact on:
1. Schools
2. Fire services
3. Police services
4. Plan for flood control or emergency drainage
--
POTENTIAL LEGAL CLAIMS OVER MUNICIPAL
LAND USE DECISIONS
I. CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION UNDER 42 U.S.C. ~1983.
II. "INVERSE CONDElVINATION" OR "TAKINGS".
III. SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS.
IV. PROCEDUR.\.L DUE PROCESS.
V. STATE PERlVIIT STATUTE: RC"V CH. 64.40.
VI. INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH BUSINESS
EXPECTANCY.
Vl-}-;----N-E-GhIG-EN-T lVIISREP-RESEm-A-=f-K>-N.
VIII. NEGLIGENT ADlVIINISTRATION OF REGULATION.
IX. NUISANCE
X. ILLEGAL DEDICATIONS, FEES OR CONDITIONS.
'OHN L McCORMACK
lARK R aUCKLIN
MNOAL W E8BERSON
WIL:"!AM P SCl-lCE:'
Si=VEN L THCRSRUO
MIC -AEL C WALTER
AN': ;:;.e:W G COOLE"f
Si=:JART A ESTES
OE50RAH 0 BRCCKINGS
KEATING, BCCKLI~ & l\.-lCCOR:YIACK, INC., P.S.
A TIOR:'\Cl S .-\7 L-\ \V
800 FiF7H AVENUE. SUITE 4141
SE.:"TTLi: WASHING70N 98104_31i5
PHCNE 12So, 523-8861
F,.l.,X 12SO, 22:;,9423
E-MPoIL i<c~!awye's.suswest ne!
CHLOETHIEl W DeWEESE
JAYNE L. FREEMAN
JP.MES A BURTON
STE?HANIE E. CROLL
MIChAEL D TRE:;ER
RICi-IARO B JOLLEY
BRENDA L BANNON
MARY~NNMCCONAUGHY
,eF COUNSEL,
,,<caE=;'7" C l(e;..TING IRE7
Li\.~D i-SE L~~ "V' & yIl-~ICIP~-\L LL-\BILIT\-
RECOy!yIENDA TIONS FOR EFFECTIVE L.-\2'iD L'SE RISK ~L~~AGEyIE~T
Presented for: \\"(1.-\ ~lember Cities
:yrichael C. 'tv'alter
1. f';TRODCCTIO~
ThIS :vfemora11dum is a '2ener:d OVer\'le'.V of .:sk m;magemer:.: 5u;;~eSLlons re!:mr.g to 1:l.t1G use pl::U'1.I':.ing.
zoning, regulation and q~i-judiclal decision-ma.'cng for municlpai offlclals a.'1d emplo~'ees. The law of
lunicipal land use liability is in a rapId state of expansion. and thIS yfemorandum is intended to ider.tify
present, key high-risk areas in land use decisIon-mak:ng. and to provide suggestions for reducmg potential
legal claims against municipalities. e1ec.ed offiCIals and their employees.
This yfemorandum is intended as an outl1ne. ;md is not an exhaustIve treatment of issues presented.
If in doubt about any land use action. municipal officials and employees should ahva; s consult their Ciry
Anorney.
The information in this yfemorandum is intended for the exclusive use of Washington Cities Insurance
Authority (\VCIA) Member Cities and their employees onlv. ThIS information is copyright protected by
Keating, Bucklin & McCormack. Inc.. P.S., 1996. and is not be used or reprinted in any way without the
express, 'Ntitten permission of the author and/or law rirrn.
II. GE:\'ER-1..L RCLES FOR REDCCI:\G LITIGA TIO~ EXPOSl-RE.
A. Know your municipal code. CJ.fe:'i.;,lly rene\v those sections of your code which are
applicable to your dunes. paying par::cular attenr:on to both procedures and substantive
requirements for decision makmg.
B. Follow all municipal code requirements. In gener::l!. the law does r.ot permit municipal
decision makers to deviate from COGe re~Ulrernents. unless expressly authorized by the code
or by state law.
.'
.'
WAL TER, Risk .'vlgm( R.:c..
Page 2
D. Ensure th3t inform3tion given to the public is accurate aDd complete. Don't make
represem:mons of fact unless you :lrc sure that the miormation LS accur:ne and up to d:'He.
Don't guess ::J.t ilIls\'.e:-s to ques'tions from pror;e:-:y o\\ne:-s.
E. Always respond to requests and communications by property owners. ThIS LS simpi:; good
customer sen-lce.
F. Consider the effect of every decision you make on the property owner. A.sk yourself how
your deCIsion \...-i11 affect the property o\\ner's de':etopmem rights a.'1d the o\\<ner' 5 tinancial
expectiltlons, Consider how you are treatlng the prope:-:y O\\TIer. In other words. put yourself
in the property o'Wner' s shoes,
G. Treat persons in the same class equally and consistently. The FederJ.l and State
Constitutions require that murucipal leglslarion. regulations and policies be applied equally to
persons in the same "class".
H. Ensure That Your City Has Good Legal Counsel. Your City .-\croITiey should be schoole~
in land use law. ad!ninistrati\e law. and general municipal law.
I. Follow strictly all state and municipal time limitations for land use approvals and
hearings. Specifically. the 1995 Regulatory Reform Act. ESHB 1724, imposes specific time
lines for the processing. reviewing and decision-making associated with landuse applications.
If you are unsure of these or any other regulatory time lirnitatlons. check with your City
Attorney.
J. '\Vbenever possible, use a Hearmg Exammer. He:lrmg Examiners are-speciatly-trained.
skilled individuals with particular knowledge in land use law and the regulatory and
admimstrative processes which implement the law. Hearing Examiners CilIl help ensure legally
supportable quasi-judicial decision-making and are an excellent form of risk-prevention.
K. Don't let personalities dictate the action you take in conjunction with a land use
application, appeal or decision.
L. Don't do anything with the intent to frustrate the attempts of property owners to develop
their land,
M. Don't let politics interfere with land use decision-making. Politics has no place in the lilIld
use decision-makmg process -- either quasi-judicial or legislative.
N. Don't make decisions based solely on potential secondary gain to the City.
ViAL TER. RIsk J/gm(. Rr!c,
2age 3
P. Don't use inappropriate words or conduct ill legislative or quasi-judicial hearings or
public meetings.
Q. Don't give legal advice or legal opinions. Rd~r J.llleg;J.l questlons to your City .A.ttorney (or
response.
R. Don't base land use decision-making on prejudice. bias. race. age. ethnic background,
handicapped status, or other discriminatory criteria. For example. the Fderal Fair Housing
Act and its amendments mak~ It unla'.v-rul for any City to use discriminator:: criteria in
restricting the placement or o{::e:-:.lt1on 0 f ., group homes" or handicapped facilmes in single
family residential zones.
S. Don't deny land use applic:ltions based solei... on aesthetic criteria. unless vour City has
a clear and enforceable "design code". DeCIsions based on vague or ambiguous design
criteria are a "red tlag" for Cour.s revlcwing municlpd deCIsion-making.
T. :"lever let friendships or business relationships enter into or affect your land use decision
making.
U. Don't waive requirements of your municipal code in conjunction with land use
applications. This could give rise to equal protection violation.
V. Don't foster unrealistic expectations of property owners. Throughout the application.
review and hearing process. be realistlc and objective. Do not make promises.
W. Communicate freely with otner JunsolctlOns and agencies durmg the land development
process. Don't make land use deciSIOns in a "vacuum", Some entities that the City should
keep in touch \vith include: De?artment of Ecology (DOE): Depanment of Health (DOH):
Washington State Depanrnent of Transportation (WSDOT): enited States Army Corps of
Engineers; Washmgton State DepartIp~:1t of ~atur::J.I Resources: and Department of Fish and
Wildlife.
III. LEGISL-\ TIVE RlSK "IA~.-\GEyIE~T
A.. If in doubt about the validity of a municIpal ordinance. regulation or policy. seek advic~ of
your City Arromey
B. Ensure that there is :l rational basis for every ordinance or resolution. Base the ordinance
or resolutlon on facts' supporting pre\ ention of a public harm. protection of the public health.
safety or welfare. or adding to th..: ~conomlC well-being of the City. Eve~: piece of legislation
1..~ _1____ __ _ L____ a._ ____ _ _ _ ___~___~___I:__.
W.-V. TER. Risk J/gml. Rr!c,
?age ~
c.
Moratoria Ordinances. These should be a last resort.
Ordinances are allo\vable oni:. in response to an emergenc:.
tide emerQ:enc'/ .-\11 moraror:a ordinances shoulc.
l"se them sparingly. :\'-[oratoria
sIruatIOn. There must be a bonJ.
1. Ha\ e a "sunset c!:luse" -- limIted Jur::ltion (recommended 6 months):
.., Limited application -- narrowly t:lilored Uimit speciticJ.lly to. (for example. Residential
building permits):
3. Protect \tested rights -- moratorl:l ordinances should not ~xtinguish or R~SLric! propert:'
o'Wl1ers' vested rights:
of. Contain a factual predicJ.te establishing the narure and extent of the er:lergency:
5. Contain waiver or vaIunce pro\oisions to alleviate exceptional hQrdship:
6. Be in compliance with RC\\" 35 63.200.
D. All legislation should be: clear, easy to understand and follow; not vague or
discretionary; always reviewed by the City Attorney.
E. Consider including "waiver" or "variance" provisions in high risk legislation. For
example, risky or controversial land use regulations such as critical areas ordinances. or design
review regulations. etc. These provisions can help reduce hardship created by the legislation
on specific classes of individuals meeting specific criteria. Include a hearings and review
process.
F. With respect to new regulations, consider adopting a process to include a determination
of the economic effect of the regulation on private property. Courts will scrutinize property
regulation to determine if the Cities have taken into account the economic impact of ne\ov
regulation~ in determining whether a "Taking" of property has occurred.
G. Establish a sound basis for land use and environmental regulations through: (1) good
comprehensive planning; (1) detailed background studies; and (3) expert testimony.
H. Be creative and flexible in regulating land. Consider creJ.tive approaches to balancing
property nghts with protecting public interest such as through waiver or variance provisions.
transfer of development rights. fleXIble zoning mechanisms like PRD' s and PCD' s, density
transfers, bonus point allocations. etc.
T Hnr ...n l..n;.,)..,tlnn \Nhi,.h irnnn..p<: irnn'll't fpp<: nr rpn,"rp" r!p,-lil"lt,nn" nf I~lncl nn n..u'
WAL TER. Risk Jyfgmr. Rcc..
h.ge 5
J. Throughout your decision-making process, keep in mind how municipalities and property
owners differ in their understanding of the land use approval process. Gene~;}lly. proper::,-
oV-lners see th~ land de'. e:upme:lt process as a "business" with economic Illte~ests at the hem
of the process. y[umclpaiitles. on ~he othc~ hand. unlize discree~ - agerlc:es (planners.
environme:ltalIsts. pub lic \\ orks. etc.) To cre:.lte dec:sions \\ hlch satist~.. to some extent. each
of the discreet aQ:enc:es. In short. mumclCalitles do not aoerate like a business. althoulZh
_ .. L -
property o\.vners would like the process to work more like a busmess.
K. Eliminate internal conflicts in your municipal code. and conflicts between your code and
otber land use regulations.
L. \Vhen developing new critical or sensitIve-areas regulations (regulations governing
wetlands. steep slopes, unstable soils. etc.), use the "best available science" to determine
the type and extent of the regulations. \\ ben used to re:;ubte. these reguiatlor..s must result
in the "le:lSt onerous" me:l.t1S i:O achieve the desm~d results.
rY". OC-\ST-.rCDICIAL RISK REDCCTTO~_
A. ~lake a good, administrative record of reasons wby a particular decision is made. The
reasons should be clear. and miculated III conjunction with standards for review and approval
from your municipal code or from Slate law.
B. Ensure that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support your decision to either
grant, deny or condition applications or permits. The "quantity" of evidence generally
required is "substantial e\.ldence". Evidence can be in the form of studies, tests. surveys.
reports. plannmg documents or tesnmony. Generally. the more evide-nc-e:-the-bencr.
C. Ensure that for each quasi-judicial decision. findings of facts and conclusions of law are
prepared. Again. ensure that there is "subst.:mtial evidence" in the record to support each
tinding of fact.
D. In approving permits, don't go beyond the express requirements of your municipal code
or state law, Do not add ne'.\i requirements that are not cor..cained in your code. mandJ.ted by
state law or utilized through adopted policy
E. \Vhen imposing conditions on a land development project. ensure that each condition is:
(1) reasonable; (2) clear and specific; (3) proportional to the harm created by the
proposed project: and (-i) capable of being accomplished.
F. l\-bke a good. clear record of quasi-judicial decision-making. Hearmgs should conform (oJ
_ ____L____ ..._,..,1 ........,.~ }"" \11 _"hi;,... J,.,~""""'_rTr c-J..,J'"'\"I""{ h~ rprf"\rt1prJ .lll pvhihl'c
:
;
\VAl. TER. RIsk .Yfgmr. Ree.,
Page 6
G. The standard of review for quasi-judicial decision-making is. in most cases. "arbitrary
and ca p ricious". .-\.:tion is "arbitrary and capricIous" ",.:hen it is \villful anc ur...re~oning or
ta..l(en in disregard of the facts and Clrcumst.:lnces.
H. Consider all of the evidence offered. Do not refuse to re~e:\'e documents or teSi:lmony in
conjunction with quasi-Judicial decision-making.
V. ;\-II~TSTERI.-\L PER\.lIT PROCESSI:'-iG/DECISION-yL-\KI:'-iG
A. Keep in mind vested rights! (See ~\il).
B. rse an "intake sheet" at permit counter. For all applicatIons. have the aFpl:cant complete
an intake sheet, including the applicant's name. address. phone nwnbe:-. d.:l!~. n~!Ure of permIt.
etc.
c. rse "intake sheets" for general inquiries. Cse the intake sheet deSGIbe:=: in ~V.B.. above.
For general inquiries, Identify the nature of the inqUIry and the inrorm::mon given by the
municipal employee.
D. Follow carefully state and local requirements for permit application information. For all
permit applications. ensure that you are follo\.ving state and local standards in determining the
information sought. The State Building Code. RC\\i 19.27, requires. for example. certain
specific information to be requested on all building permit applications for any work costing
more than 55,000.00.
F.. Ensur.e-thaLa.ll b1tilding permiL:.\P-IllkaJions include evjrJeoc.LOLade.q_uatLp_Qlahte water
source or supply. This is a Gr.-L-\ and building code requirement. The evidence can consist
of either a DOE permit, a water availability letter. or another form of "proof' sufficient to
satisfy the City.
F. Process all permits in a timely and consistent manner. Ensure time compliance with the
deadlines set torth in the Regul:J.tory Reform .-\ct. ESHB 172J., and all muniCIpal regulanons.
G. Don't deny development permits based on aesthetic criteria alone, unless your code
specifically authorizes this through a design review process.
H. Don't ignore permit violations. IgnOrIng or fading to act on kno\vn land use permIt
violations C:J.I1 expose the City to civil liability.
I. Set up a uniform procedure for investigating and addressing permit violation complaints.
Get as much intormation on the permit violanon as possible. Establish and follow a procedure
WAr.. TER, RIsk .'vlgml. Rt!c..
Page 7
J. ""'here state law or municipal code does not provide an answer, adopt written policies and
guidelines to till-in the gaps. ~[an:: Issues :lI'e not adcressed by state statute. municipal
ordinance or by orhe: pe:-:nming stanc:ards. such as the l"niform Building Code. In such cases.
the City should "fill-m the pps" Witt its own \VTltte:1 policies and procedures.
K. Don't waive municipal code requirements for permits.
L. In issuing permits. don't go beyond the express requirements of your code or state law.
VI. VESTED RIGHTS
A. Remember vested rights. The constltutionally-based doctrine of "vested rights" prOUlOltS
cines from changing zoni:lg or land de\ eto~ment regulations after the property O\Nner has
submitted a sufficientl: complete applicanon which is in comf:liance \'lith ilie:1-existing zonmg
and other land use la""s in ef:ect. Once the elemens of vested rights have been established.
the City cannot apply ne'.vly adoptee zoning or deyelopmem regulations to that applic:ltion
or proJect.
B. Vested rights apply to the following:
(1) ~1ajor plats and short plats (RCV': 58.1i.033);
(2) Building permits tRC\V 19.27.095):
(3) SEPA threshold decisions; and
(-I-) Virrually any kind of land development permit (i.e.. grading permItS. shoreline
permits. conditional use permits. etc.).
C. Vested rights do not apply to the following:
(1) Original zoning or rezones:
(2) Comprehensive plans:
(3) Variance applications:
(4) Written studies or analyses: or
(5) Site Plans.
.'
"
W.-\[ TER, Risk .\tfgmt. Rec..
Page 8
E. Completeness. (1) Full plats/short plats and building permits: standard is "fully complete".
All municipal requirements must be fully complied with before the application is deemed
"complete" for vesnng. All other permits: standard is "substantially complete". Something less
than "fully complete".
F. Cities can define, through ordinance, what makes a "complete" application for purposes
of vesting. Cities are encour:l!zed to adopt such ordinances for all land use applications.
l\lission Springs v. City of Spokane.
134 Wn.2d 947 (April 23, 1998)
BACKGROr~L> FACTS
Mission Springs. a private real estate developer. sought to develop a "planned unit
development" (peD), comprised of 790 apartment units located in 33 separate bull dings In the City
of Spokane The City's hearing examiner approved the peD application. subject to various
conditions which were acceptable to ~1ission Springs After the appro\al. ~1ission Springs was
statutorily vested to build out the planned improvements for a period of fi\e years
rv1ission Springs obtained grading and building permits for the apar.ment buildings in early
1993, but, for reasons of its Oowl1. did not utilize them prior to their expiration in \(ay 199-l In
October 1994, ~1ission Springs submitted a new application for a grading permit identic:!1 in form
to the old one containing all of the components required by the Spokane ;\(unic:pal Code
Spokane's building official briefed the Spokane City Council and stated that the grading permit was
ready to be issued and that the legal depar.ment had re\lev.ed the process and agreed that the permit
should issue Notwithstanding, the City Counc:1 v.ithhe!d the grading permit for 5e\eral months
under the guise of investigating public health and safety issues associated with the project. The
Council members were advised by the City Attorney that a refusal to issue the permits \'yould be a
chaner violation. The Council did not follow this ad\ice, and passed a motion refusing to gram the
grading permit.
In refusing to grant the permit. the Cty Council was attempting to cater to a citizen activist
organization and to ". . the other members of the community who have serious concerns about the
traffic problems up in that area "In ignoring the recommendation of the building offiCial and
the advice of the city attorney, one council member stated. "We have the opportunity to put a stop
to this [project] and let's just see what happens Let's see how confident they [the developers] are.
If they bring a suit, we can always turn around and issue the pennit, that's an option still available to
us." lvfisslOn Springs, at 956
__~__~__._________F_L.A~-=u:E-F~S-CL"\D1S_~'i~TRED~S...A.G~I~LSI IRE CITY
A~D CITY COV~CIL ~IE'IBERS
Mission Springs sought damages and attorney fees from the City of Spokane. the City
Manager, the City Council, and each individual member of the City Council for ci\d rights and
statutory violations resulting from the wrongful 'Withholding of a grading permit. The plaintiffs also
sought injunctive relief.
COeRT'S DECISION
. The issuance of a penmt, like a grading permit, is not a matter of discretIOn. but is
ministerial The applicant is entitled to immediate issuance of the permit upon satisfaction
of rdevant ordinance criteria The permit may not be withheld at the discretion of a local
official to allow time to undertake further study .MisslOn SprIngs. at 960-961
. Arbitrary or irrational refusal or interference with processing a land use permit \iolates
J'
I
Mission Sprin!!5 v. City of Spok:me
Page 2
without lawful authority in unreasoning and willful disregard 'of the permit applicant" s
lawful entitlements" J\t!isslOn Sprmgs, at 962.
. The City CouncIl in J\.liSSlOn Sprmgs was liable because it inte~ected itself into the
administrative process reserved to the City yfanager, notwithstanding clear and unequivocal
charter mandate to the contr3.ry. AfisslOn Springs, at 971
. Council members and the City ylanager were liable because they rejec~ed lawful. mandatory
requirements for the processing and issuance of grading permits codified in state st:ltute and
local ordinance without justification. The City Code did not permit delay in the issuance of
a building or grading permit while the municipality reconsidered the peD approval which it
had granted previously Although the Council' 5 irrationality was objectively established by
the departure from the mandatory legal process, the court noted that the irrationality was
further dramatized by the overt rejection of advice from the City' 5 own attorney in favor of
the defiant cause of action. The court said: "The Spokane City Council rec~:ved w'e!l-
founded legal advice from its city attorney which it chose to disregard" A!iS.\lVll Springs. at
961.
. rvlission Springs had a constitutionally protected propeny right in the gr3.ding permit It
sought. The right to that permit and to use and enjoy land is a property right which the City,
City Manager, and City Council violated by willfully disregarding :'vlissions Spnngs' I avv-fu I
entitlements. NliSSlOn Sprmgs, at 962.
. City Council members who improperly interfere with the process by which a city issues land
development or construction pennits deprive the pennit applicant of his property absent that
process which is due. The City Council purposefully abrogated the mandatory process
which otherwise would have resulted in issuance of the grading permit to Mission Springs
-------------- -----JVlission Jprlngs, at 9o)-6Q----- -------------------------------~-- ---- -----
. Had the City Council repealed the earlier ordinance approving i\tlission Springs' project
upon an appropriate finding of changed circumstance, there may have been a different
situation. But it did not. Nor was there a delay caused by foot dragging or inefficiency
The City Council purposefully abrogated the mandatory process which would have
otherwise resulted in permit issuance
. Members of the City Council were not entitled to legislative immunity because the motion
passed by the Spokane City Council was not legislation generally applicable to the entire
community but, rather, an act directed specifically at ~lission Springs Thus, the act was
administrative or executive in nature, not legislative. and therefore legislative immunltv was
_ _ J
not available in this case
CHOOSE YOUR WORDS CAREFULLY
I. HIGH RISK 'YORDS
"- Suitable '. Practicable
, ,
"- Belief , Like
, ,
"- Assume , Old
, ,
"- Feeling . Harmonv
, ,
"'
, Style " SensitIve to
, ,
"- Reasonable Character
, ,
, Compatible Impression
, ,
"- Similar to Unique
, ,
'. N e V.i . Significant
, ,
, Public Good - Public Interest
,. ,
"- lYlood ... Appropriate
, ,
II. ~IA~DA TORY 'VOROS
, Shall
- \V i 11
,
, I\lust
, ReqUIred
,
... r.landatory
,.
III. ADVISORY (NOT REQUIRED) \VORDS
,. Should
,. i'vlav
___ ____________________________________, Ercler____________________________..:..._____________ ___ _ ___
,. Can
tV. DEFI:\lITIONS
A. Define words In code or standards
B. Definitions should be:
1. Clear
2. Unambiguous
3. Understandable to lay persons
C. Undefined terms:
1. \VIiI be gi\en plain and ordinary meaning
.'
.'
1.
II.
m.
IV.
v.
OPTIONS TO AVOID LEGAL LIMITS ON
REGULATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT AND USE
OWN THE LAND OCTRIGHT
A Buy the land outright at F:\-IV.
B. Exchange city-owned property for land.
LESS THAN A FEE I~TEREST
A Easement (purchased or donated).
1. Easement for particular purpose (trail, park, open space, etc.).
2. Conservation easement (donated).
i. Legal agreement by property owner to restrict uses and activities
on property.
11. Owner gets tax deductionJexemption.
Hi. Any government entity = qualified donee.
IV. Owner gets charitable deduction for restricted value.
v. ~lust be conservation purposes (outdoor recreation, education,
natural habitat, historic importance, open space, scenic
enjoyment, etc.
B. Establish land trust.
1. E.g., agreement that conveys right to enforce restrictions to qualified
third party.
C. Land use agreement (GI\'IA).
1. Authorized under G~IA.
2. Only one hearing required.
3. City can impose controls:
i. Limit ability to construct buildings on all or part of land.
n~ __ _____~ ___ __Ji.____ Limit right to subdivide.
Hi. Limit right to harVest~~- ~- -- -- ----~
iv. Limit right to restrict access.
4. Agreement negotiated between city/owner.
CLUSTERING
A. Concentrate sprawled development to segregated portion of property.
CREA TIVE ZONING
A ~Iixed use developments.
B. PUD's, PRD's, POD's, etc.
C. Density transfers.
TRANSFER OF DEVELOP~IENT RIGHTS
.&. T ~a~l1v rpdrictinu develonment on one DarceL while limitin2: