HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 03/07/2006
FO,RTANGELES.,
.
WAS H I N G TON, U.S. A.
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
321 EAST FIFTH STREET
March 7, 2006
SPECIAL MEETING - 5:00 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING - 6:00 p.m.
A. CALL TO ORDER - Special Meeting (5:00 p.m.)-
B. CALL TO ORDER - Regular Meeting (6:00 p.m.)
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PUBLIC CEREMONIES, PRESENTATIONS
1. Proclamation in recognition of Ron Jones'
induction into Washington Music Educators
Association's Hall of Fame
2. Proclamation in support of World KidneyDay
March 9th
3. Report from United Way for 2005 Human Services
Funding and Recommendations/Contract for 2006
C. WORK SESSION
~
1
Flood mitigation measures presentation by the
Army Corps of Engineers
3 1. Present proclamation
5i:'''''''Present proclamation
7 3. Accept 2005 Report and Approve 2006
Contract
D. (1) LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON THIS OR FUTURE AGENDAS as determined by City Manager or Council
member.
(2) PUBLIC COMMENT. This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the City Council about
anything. To allow time for the Council to complete its legislative agenda, comments should be limited to no more than
5 minutes per person and a total of 15 minutes for this comment period: (These time periods may be lengthened or
shortened at the discretion of the Mayor).
E. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
1. City Council vacancy report
F. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
1. Peninsula Village Planned Residential
Development and Subdivision final approval
2. Municipal Code Amendment: Amendment to
Section 15.12 - Flood Damage Preyerition
3. Municipal Code Amendment: Amendment to
Sectjon 17.96 - Appeals
21 1. Waive second reading, adopt ordinance.
41 2. Second reading, adopt ordinance.
61 3. Second reading, adopt ordinance.
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
March 7, 2006 Port Angeles City Council Meeting
Page - 1
G. RESOLUTIONS
. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
1. Ralston Preliminary Subdivision - Park/Porter 67 1. Preliminary approval of subdivision
2. Master Mutual Aid Agreement with Clallam 95 2. Renew Agreement with Modifications
CountyFire Districts # 2, #3 and #4
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS - QUASI-JUDICIAL
(7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter)
1. Ralston Rezone - Park/Porter 109 1. Conduct hearing and first reading of
Ordinance.
J. PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER
1. OlyCAP Loan Agreement - City CDBG funds 167 1. Open hearing to reprogram CDGB funds
and continue hearing to March 21, 2006.
K. FINANCE
L. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City Council Minutes of February 21,2006 regular 175 1. Accept Consent Agenda
meeting and February 28, 2006 special meeting
2. Expenditure List - February 11,2006- 187
$2,623,374.16
3. 2006 Storm Repairs, Project 06-02, accept 211
4. City Manager office space reconfiguration 213
M. INFORMATION
1. City Manager Reports
. Change Orders, Contracts under $15K, Bids and 215
Grants
2. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - 217
February 8, 2006
N. EXECUTIVE SESSION (As needed and determined by City Attorney)
O. ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC HEARINGS .
Public hearings are set by the City Council inorderto meet legal requirements pertaining to matters such as, ,land use permitapplications.propp~ed
amendments to City land use regulations,.zoningchanges, annexations. In addition, tile City Council may set a publiC hearing in order to receive
public input prior to ,makinQ decisions ."vhichirnpact the citizens. Certain mattersmay.~e controversial, and, the City Council may choose to seek'
ublicopinionthroughthe public hearing process. .' ..
March 7, 2006
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
Port Angeles City Council Meeting
Page - 2
---------------- -
"
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
I.
Jrx~j-<tO- ~ 5d4 p.W\. -
CALL TO ORDE~ - ~G~H MEETING:
n. ROLL CALL:
Members Present:
Mayor Rogers
Deputy Mayor Williams
Councilmember Braun
Councilmember Erickson
Councilmember Munro
Councilmember Wharton
=*
+=
Staff Present:
Manager Madsen '
Attorney Bloor
Clerk Upton
.I
+
G. Cutler
D. McKeen
T.Riepe
Y. Ziomkowski
March 7 ~ 2006
&~ p.'tn.
~.
Ill. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Led by: ~OtJ ^~.l 0 /Yl () mfbOA-- ~ ()
· ~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Attendance Roster
DATE OF MEETING: March 7. 2006
LOCATION: City Council Chambers
5l" S. P-e'Cl\oc:ld ~. ,4\ 1. 'L po A
I '-t '1. 1= P A ak P A
J>>
st
P.I4.
)
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
City Manager
City Attv. (1)
Planninl!:
City Clerk~ J
I~"
Personnel
Cust. Svcs.
Finance
Dir./Mgr.
Police Dept.
Fire Dept.
Lil!:ht Dept.
Parks & Rec.
MRSC (1)
PDN (Summary)
Extra Copies
I TOTAL
Ordinance/Resolution Distribution List
City of Port Angeles
City Council Meeting of March 7. 2006
~ fJA.d A-r"V ~A ~,,~
_ '7 J J Jl . 7J YlIJ if IJ
I!JJ1\J -. n_ ~ 71' DJ! 5 I, '" -0 D -r'
I J:m^ ^" . Inn rJ~ 1'1 Cti'
7T r'l. . _ _ _,. ('A _ r (J'L..'
rw I~ ., "- '^ " nn 11
,/
,7
,7
,7
"'1
J ../
J ./
J./
J../
17
,7
/7
,7
/ /
) '7 /.,/ ,7
~1 fV\tV\1J ~j M IV\.J ,~J I'Vl M \I
J::..
.~
.5
.
I
.
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
March 7, 2006
CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities ~
Flood Protection Mitigation along the ElwhaRiver
Summary: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), under the federal Elwha Dam Removal
Project, is designing flood protection facilities along the Elwha River from below the Glines
Canyon dam to the mouth of the river. They will present today a summary of the design effort to
date.
Recommendation: For information only.
Background/Analysis: The ACOE has been involved in levee/flood protection projects along
the Elwha River since the 1950s. In 1995, the ACOE completed a flood impact study as part of
the Environmental Impact Statement for the Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration
Act that was passed by Congress in 1992. The ACOE and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation then
completed detailed flood modeling in 2002-2005. The results of this modeling are now being
used to design flood mitigation measures to protect existing homes and facilities along the river
that will be impacted by the removal of the two dams.
The ACOE will present a summary of the flood modeling, including a discussion of
sedimentation in the river, floodplain changes and depth and duration of floodIng, especially as it
relates to critical structures on the river such as the City's Ranney Collector well and its ~control
building. They will then describe the proposed flood mitigation facilities currently being
designed.
The Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Business Council has been invited to attend the presentation.
N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Flood Protection Presentation by ACOE.doc 1
.
.
.
2
~
,......,
.~
I 1
I . ,
"
I '"
u
T'
2
3
'<:t
J
~
9
1 .1'r"l11 l;S ,\rI11Y C"rps "," I:I1~illt:c'r'. 211(13. \ kl )ol1<1ld Ilrid~c' (j'I~L' is <It R \ 1 X.h. I 2 llli Ie- llpstrL'<llll ot' II \I \. I (II
2.I'n1111 1:1\\11<1 DLlS II-l'i()
Recurrence Peak Peak Peak Percent Chance
Interval Discharue Discharge Discharge that this Flood
b
(years) (Flow) at (Flow) at (Flow) at Flow would be
McDonald mouth of mouth of exceeded in any
Bridoe Elwha River Elwha River uiven year
b ~ ~
Gage (cfS)1 ( cfs ) I ( cfs f!
4,550 5,000 5,000 97,()(%
2 13,300 14,620 13,000 50,()(%
5 20,400 22,420 20,500 20.0(1.,
10 25,600 28,130 25,800 10.0%
25 31,000 34,070 33,000 4'() %
50 38,400 42,200 38,5(H) 2.0%
iOO -l~5HO -tS,9 W -t:\OOO LO'~~,
200 50,900 55,940 50,100 0.5%
500 60,000 0.2%
.January 2002 25,700 I 0 (1.,
Flood of 41,600 ~1.5%
Record (1897)
7
8
r'
,J
!
Previously. . .
- Corps and FEMA used rule of thunlb "freeboard" to
account for uncertainties in predictions fron1 flood
n10dels when designing flood protection ("just add 3
feet")
Now
- Corps Policy for Flood Protection is:
EM 1110-2-1619 (1994) used for Elwha
ER 1105-2-101 January 2006 "Post Katrina"
- "All flood danlage reduction studies will adopt
risk based analysis (EM 1110-2-1619)..."
More accurate, quantifies uncertainty, allows for
better decision nlaking
9
o
......
.
..
BOR Modeling 1995-1996
- Fron1 Glines Canyon Dan1 to river n1outh-
sedinlentation and in1pacts vary.
- Peer reviewed, state of the art (at the till1e), but large
uncertainties.
Latest BOR ReCOlTIlTIendations
- Maxill1al in1pact of sedinlentation below Elwha Danl is
expected to be no nlore than 2.4 ft
- Corps/NPS satisfied with BOR lllodeling,
interpretatiolls, and recoll1ll1elldations.
--- Corps uses 2.5 ft to account for sedin1cntation in flood
n10deling belo\,y Elwha Danl
11
..
12
Uncertainty analysis adds at least 2 ft
Sedil11entation adds 2.5 ft
200-year flood level is approxi111ately 0.9 ft
higher
If river aggradation il11pact is only 1.5 ft, we
have eqLlivalent to better tha11 200-year
flood protection
13
85
75
gg 65
C
~
Z
g
c
o
:;::
111
>
~ 55
W
45
35
15000
Ranney Well 1 OO-yr Water Level Comparison
. Ranney Well Floor EI. 70.16 ft
.. WDR 100-yr WSEL = 71.18 ft
- Min Channel Elevation
- Existing 100-yr
15200
15400
River Station (ft)
m m Control Building Floor EI. 68.28 ft
WDR 100-yr WSEL = 71.23 ft
... = .~. Diesel Tank Footing EI.- 67 ft
WDR 100-yr WSEL = 71.3 ft
-&-95% Confidence Top of Levee
-+- Ex 100-yr + 2.5 ft
15600
15800
16000
14
15
\0
........
r--
.......
18
Ranney well exterior has fastest overbanl<
floodwater, up to 6 ft/sec- potentially
dangerous
Control building has lowest overbanl<
velocities, up to 4 ft/sec
Velocities in side channel are higher
Floating debris cOllld be dalnaging dllri11g
1 % to 20/0 cha11ce flood
19
Velocity on top of bank
u
Q)
(/)
;e 2
8
00
100
200
300
400
500
20
......
N
N
N
r-
Protect critical facilities fron1 flooding during the 1 OO-year~
1 % chance~ after danl renloval flood event
Maintain existing flood protection level for non-critical
facilities requiring flood protection at Inininlunl
Reasonably account for uncertainty in predictions
Keep facilities operational during design flood
Protect water quality of rearing channel
Maintain elnergency access
Address groundwater flooding
Keep costs down
Use off-the shelf designs to 111inilnize O&M
23
"r
'<:t
N
.
to
+ + + /. tI!"''- + +,
",;A .
/~nBe~.~~1 .
... ... .... AC' I I.... ... ... + + ... ... ....-
+ 'I + ... ~~m .....,.--.. r~' "''''~,
SEE ~ SEE P~TE C;
... ... ... ... + .'" ...
\. ......-' - \ . ~ ~
+ + +
+ + + . .. .. 1 + +
,...l
+ + + +
... ... + +
Ranney Well
25
... Ix ~
Do Nothing
Levee and Riprap (original plan)
Pile Debris Barrier wi Turnaround and
Catwall( (interilTI plan)
Gabion Basl(et Floodwall w/Tllrnarollnd
and Catwall( (current plan)
All options tie into larger EWTP levee and
CrOW11 Z road
26
"
"
.-...--\
~...\.
'\"
\....
\.
\
1/4-IN PVC \.
DRAIN
;
I
/'/
./
....~............~-~............
27
,-" .... }
28
~ ..
C.u...rtit1ti..llat1
I).tails
29
" ... \,
... -
Need review of Corps 900/0 plans by City
engineering tealTI
Buy-offfron1 NPS and City on Flood Control
designs is needed to con1plete EWTP flood
protection plans
Given that new control building is being
constructed on fill, Corps prefers construction of
levee to Ranney well. Given that this would
require den10lition of the existing control building-
is this off the table?
30
.--<
~
"'
.
~
N
~
-,
,
M
M
...
#
.'
PROCLAMATION
In Recognition of
RON JONES
WHEREAS, Mr. Ron Jones was inducted as the 2215t member of the Washington Music
Educators Association's Hall of Fame on Friday, February 17th 2006. The
Washington Music Educators Hall of Fame was established to give recognition for
exceptional support, inspiration and outstanding contribution to. the growth and
development of music education, both public and private, in the state of
Washington. Ron's work in the Washington Music Educators Association includes
terms as Orchestra Curriculum Director and West Vice President; and
WHEREAS, During his 30+ year tenure at the Port Angeles High School, Ron Jones has brought
the high school orchestra program from a group of just 13 string players to more
than 90 students involved in the three orchestras - symphonic, chamber and
freshman concert, many who consistently perform at a championship level and is
highly regarded for his long-standing contribution to the Port Angeles School
District music program by the district administration.
WHEREAS, Mr. Jones has worked tirelessly in support of orchestra programs not only in Port
Angeles but also throughout Washington state. He consistently encourages all
students to be their best, and to strive for more than expected while developing a
life-long appreciation for the arts. Mr. Jones has encouraged hundreds of dedicated
and exceptionally talented student musicians, and has dedicated his teaching career
to the growth and development of the Port Angeles School District orchestra
program into one of the best in the nation.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Karen A. Rogers, Mayor, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF PORT ANGELES, do hereby urge all citizens to join us in celebrating with enthusiasm the
outstanding accomplishments, dedication, and influence that Ron Jones has brought to our
community, and congratulate him on being inducted into the Washington Music Educators
Association's Hall of Fame!
March ih. 2006
Karen A. Rogers, Mayor
Voucher Number
022867
Document Number
DOl LTR 01/27/06
Account Number CITY OF
City Of
024807
Doc Date
2/2/2006
PORT AN
Port Angeles
9711
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
Net Check Amount
$5,000,000.00
2/2/2006
$5,000,000.00
I
I
'"
.
.
.
PROCLAMATION
World Kidney Day
March 9, 2006
WHEREAS, Chronic kidney disease is a major public health problem, of epidemic proportions,
with increasing incidence and prevalence, poor outcomes, and high costs; and
WHEREAS, According to the Northwest Kidney Centers Foundation, more than 20 million
Americans - one in nine adults - have chronic kidney disease; and
WHEREAS, More than 20 million more are at lncreased risk for developing kidney disease, and
most do not even know it; and
WHEREAS, High-risk groups include those with diabetes, hypertension and family history of
kidney disease; and
WHEREAS, African Americans, Hispanics, Pacific Islanders, Native Americans, and seniors are
at increased risk; and
WHEREAS, Early detection can help prevent the progression of kidney disease to kidney failure.
The earlier kidney disease is detected, the better the chance of (1) slowing or
stopping its progression, and (2) avoiding long hospital stays and dialysis.
NOW, THEREFORE, I , Karen A. Rogers, Mayor, and on behalf of the City Council of Port
Angeles do hereby proclaim Thursday, March 9, 2006 as World Kidney Day in Port Angeles.
.'''~
March 7. 2006
Karen A. Rogers, Mayor
5
.
.
.
6
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~.:."."O" R" .r.".'Pl.............N. r'G./'E' 'L' E".'iS'"
I ,,~' . i,}/', / 'J' / JI r,r ,;i:Li ,el:' &
: t
, l
-.~'.'"'''''''' -..... ., ...... . ,.,-...... ,
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
C I T Y C 0 UN elL M E M 0
March 7, 2006
CITY COUNCIL
Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk/Management Assistant W"
Report from United Way for 2005 Human Services Funding and .
Recommendation/Contract for 2006
Summary: United Way is prepared to submit its year-end report on the City's 2005 Human
Services funds. In addition, Councilmember Wharton and lody Moss, United Way Executive
Director, are prepared to submit the funding recommendations and contract for 2006.
Recommendation: Receive the 2005 year-end report and funding recommendations for
2006, and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract with United Way for the administration
. of the City's 2006 Human Services funds.
Background/ Analysis: Approximately twelve years ago, the City contracted with United Way
to administer the City's Human Services funds. United Way will again be administering these funds
in 2006 and, similar to previous agreements, United Way is to receive 2% of the distributed funds
as reimbursement for administrative costs:
For the year 2006, the level of Human Services funding was budgeted aL$127,000. The__
recommended allocations total $124,460, plus $2,540 (2% administrative costs), for a total contract
amount of$127,000.
Again, Councilmember Wharton and J ody Moss, United Way, are prepared to submit the funding
recommendations.
Attachments: Exhibit A - 2005 Year-End Report
Exhibit B - 2006 Contract with Recommended Allocations
.
7
.
.
.
8
.
.
.
Exhibit "A"
More Than Fifty Years of Caring
March 1, 2006
United Way
of Clallam County
Post Office Box 937
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Tel (360) 457 -3011
Fax (360) 457-0529
To: Mayor Karen Rogers
Port Angeles City Council Members
Mark Madsen, City Manager
From: Iody Moss, Executive Director
www.unitedway-wa.erg/clallam
Re: City of Port Angeles Human Services Funding
Enclosed is the 2005 year-end report from the agencies that received City of Port Angeles Human Services funding and the
funding recommendations for 2006. Weare continuing to ask funded agencies to report on their outcomes. You should feel
very pleased that City of Port Angeles funding is having a very positive affect on children and families. Many of the
programs see a core group of people several times or on a continuing basis, which is good prevention practice, and
prevention has always been part of the City's focus for these funds. Continuing participation of clients is one measure that
a program is establishing relationships and is able to affect change.
Overall, the programs funded by the City of Port Angeles reported a 4% increase in the numbers they served - 8180 this
year compared to 7871 last year. The number of unserved clients was much less - 346 in 2005 compared to 648 last year.
Four agencies, Pro Bono -legal services, Healthy Families - domestic violence prevention, Lutheran Community Services
_ family support services and Olympic Community Action Programs - dental access and adult day care services reported
that these people were referred elsewhere.
The following outcomes are just some of the benefits the City of Port Angeles has helped to fund over this past year:
o A safe place for at risk teens to socialize and case management services for homeless teens including housing,
education, and referrals for treatment
o Self esteem building in children and teens though child care and youth education programs
o. Legal assistance which improves quality oflife for low income individuals in high risk circumstances
o Reduction of teen pregnancy and STD rates through education and group counseling
o Low income families develop healthy social support networks, and children have positive, stimulating play
environments
o Middle and high school youth gain self esteem and skills promoting healthy relationships leading to reduction of abuse
and harassment
o Tow income, high risk families at Mount Angeles View are learning skills to develop a neighborhood network and
work on community projects
o Health care and dental access, decreasing the strain on Olympic Medical Center's Emergency Room
o Families caring for adult family members & children with behavior problems receive importaIit respite
o Improved social and behavioral skills for children with significant behavior problems
o At risk youth gain conflict resolution skills
-
On behalf of the United Way Board, I want to express our support for the City's funding of human services. We look
forward to continuing our relationship with the Council and liaisons Betsy Wharton and Grant Munro. Grant has served on
the United Way Board and will be a strong voice for human service needs in our city. And from our initial meeting it
seems that Betsy will prove to be a great asset in this process as well.
Your leadership in providing for human services shows your concern for everyone in our city, including those people
experiencing difficulties in their lives. Your funds not only have a positive effect on those directly served, but also make
the whole community safer and more inviting for everyone.
United Way is pleased to have this relationship with the City. We encourage your continued support and look forward to
working with you. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report, please feel free to call on me.
you ";:w;;;l
9
OUR MISSION To strengthen our community by helping people to live safe, healthy, and productive lives.
City of Port Angeles
Human Services Funding
Year End REPORT 2005
Agenc /Program 2005 Use of funding Outcomes Ex ected # Served # served Program Program_
Recommen. This rogram 1 year Budget Budget
PA PA for P.A. for Agency
Claiiam County Pro Bono
Lawyers
Legal Assistance i "The $3,000 Covers salaries of two part time attorneys who Provides quality legal services to families 20 unknown $2,000 $5,000
Need for Legal Services after the handle domestic violence cases quickly after impacted by domestic violence. Children no
Protection Order" protection orders are issued. i I longer exposed to fighting & abuse. Clients
I ! able to move on with their lives w/o violence
I
Family Planning
Youth Education Program $10,000 Fund a health educator who will facilitate weekly Increased knowledge of teen pregnancy and 830 536 ; 4201 contacts $13,000 $13,000
! support group session In the schools and at STDs, reduced number of pregnancies & STDs,
youth agencies, provide high school classroom reduction In risky behavior, Improved decision
education and facilitate the Baby Think It Over making. Result: decline in teen pregnancies.
program ! !
I
First Step Family Support
. Center
Drop-In Center $14,000 Fund drop-in center 5 afternoons/wk. Target Families' support systems improved, people 771 656; 2,776+ client $14,889 $16,900
! population is families with children 0-5 years of access needed resources, children have contacts P.A.,
! aga II positive & stimulating environments to play in. Sequim & Clallam
I Families get emergency food, supplies. Bay
!
Healthy Families
Children & youth support $17,950 Support groups for children & youth victims of Participants learn esteem building skills, 1688 1098 $241,384 $314,547
groups, preventibn education, domestic violence or sexual assault, education substance abuse prevention skills, coping skills.
crisis intervention' & emergency to prevent DV and date rape, crisis intervention Parents learn effective parenting and
shelter and emergency shelter for d~mestic violence communication skills. Students learn how to
victims. prevent dating violence, substance abuse and
sexual assault / harassment.
I
Lutheran Social Services
Mt. Angeles View public Housing $10,000 Collaborative effort with Housing Authority to Strengthen neighborhood of Mt. Angeles View. 40 families - 120 348 $45,000 $45,000
i provide support services to families living at Mt. Help families access services (clothing, food, people
I Angeles View public housing'- medical, legal, school supplies). Families attend parenting
domestic violence, transp., education &! classes. Families get support and networking.
employment !
I
Olympic Community Action
Health Care Access and Adult $10,000 Provide assistance to low income Individuals & Less visits to ER, less pain and suffering. 100 for medical 20 731 total. 1337 $12,000 $12,000-
Day Care families for health care & dental needs. I Provide Clients treated with respect. 439 patients got for adult day care client contacts
! respite care for families who care for elderly dental care, 211 Rx filled, 90 people saw doctor
family members with dement,ia. or dentist. 32 participated In Adult Action day
I care.
.
Page 1 of 2
.
.
.
City of po.eles
Human Services Funding
Year End REPORT 2005
.
Agency/Program 2005 Use of funding Outcomes Expected # Served # served Program Program
Recommen. .. This Drogram 1 year Budget Budget
PA P.A. for P .A. for AgencL
I
Peninsula Comm~nlty Mental
Health
Respite Care/Families with $10,000 Respite services 4 weekend days a month and Children learn / demonstrate constructive and 80 66 (103 client $163,695 $163,695
children six week summer Adventure Bound program appropriate behaviors at home and school. contacts)
(respite for parents of seriously emotiona!ly Parents get much needed respite.
disturbed children)
I
Peninsula Dispute Resolution
Center
ParentfTeen mediation and $7,000 Support for parent/teen mediation program. Conflict resolution training for youth. Task force 75 40 $6,618 $7,497
Restorative Justice Meetings Also Restorative Justice between juvenile to determine how all youth can access services.
offenders and their victims. Build collaborative referral services with
Juvenile Justice. "Bullying" workshop for
teachers. Peer Mediation training at middle
school level. More youth are served and at
earlier ages to learn non-violent resolution.
Serenity House I
Childcare at Family Village $10,000 Child care & preschool for children of homeless Breaks cycle of homelessness by allowing 72 78 kids, in 57 $134,926 $134,926
-.I and at-risk families. Includes nurturing, nutrition parents to seek employment, education, or families
-~ program, social skills, etc. training while children are well cared for and
nurtured.
:
Serenity House .
The Dream Center $8,000 Funds case manager for homeless teens, who Youth receiving case management find safe, 140 267 $54,520 $68,150
(Homeless teen drop in center) does outreach, advocacy, assessment, and regular place to sleep at night, will end or
resource referrals. Also, supplies for basic living reduce drug use, will receive mental health or
needs. No admin. costs funded. suicide prevention counseling referrals.
YMCA
Combined Youth Programming $25,000 Funds staffing, open hours, supplies needed for Childcare for every family regardless of ability to 4,250 4,360 $665,074 $924,396
(Childcare/day camps, summer youth programs and childcare. Supports fee pay, kids Increase personal & social skills.
programs, youth sports, arts and subsidy for low income families. Provides Teens have safe place to meet, personal grow1h
fitness programs, teen center) operating support for Teen Center, which experienced. Result: No child turned away due
generates no fee Income. I to inability to pay for programs.
Program Totals $124,950 8,166 8,180 $1,353,106 $1,705,111
United Way Administration - 2%
$2,550
Total from the Citv $127,500
Page 2 of 2
.
.
.
12
.
.
.
Exhibit "B"
CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is entered into this _ day of
, 2006, between the City
of Port Angeles, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "City", and United Way of Clallam County,
Washington, hereinafterreferred to as "United Way".
REPRESENTATIONS
1. As a code city operating under Title 35 A RCW, the City of Port Angeles has the legal
authority, as set forth in RCW 35A.ll.020, to exercise broad powers in the rendering oflocal social,
recreational, and educational services, hereinafter referred to as "human services".
2. It is in the public interest for City funds to be expended for human services.
3. United Way is willing and able to allocate, administer, and distribute such human
services on the City's behalf.
AGREEMENTS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above representations and the payments,
covenants and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be made and performed by the parties hereto,
the parties covenant and agree as follows:
1. Scope of Services. United Way shall provide the following services:
A.
Annually identify local human service priorities with input and direction from
the City Council;
B.
Establish a process for receipt and review of requests to the City for funding
local human services, which process shall include the participation of a City
Council member on the United Way admissions and fund distribution
committee and [mal approval of allocations by the City Council;
c.
Analyze proposals received and develop recommendations for allocation of
the City's annual human services budget appropriation;
-1-
13
D.
Ensure the distribution of funds as set fOlih in the attached Exhibit A in
accordance with City policy, legal guides and sound fiscal policy;
.
E. Maintain separate accounting and auditable fiscal records for City funds;
F. Provide a year-end report to City regarding provision of services; and
G. Monitor use of funds to assure that terms are carried out and desired
outcomes achieved.
2. Duration of Contract. The time of performance by United Way shall be
commensurate with the City's 2006 budget calendar.
3. Compensation and Method of Pavrnent.
A. The City shall reimburse United Way for the services rendered as specified
in Section 1 of this Contract at the rate of two percent of the funds distributed.
B. The funds shall be transferred from the City to United Way on a quarterly
basis and shall be distributed by United Way to the recipient programs on a quarterly basis. Any
.
accrued interest shall be retained by United Way for subsequent distribution to City-funded human
servIces.
4. Recordkeeping and Reporting.
United Way will provide quarterly financial reports reflecting activities funded with
City appropriations and semi-annual reports showing the success in meeting established objectives.
Each quarterly report will be due within sixty (60) days of the end of the quarter. Each semi -annual
report will be due with the 2nd and 4th quarter reports.
5. Hold Harmless and Indemnification. United Way shall protect, defend, indemnify
and save the City harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, and expenses,
-inc1uding.reasonable attorney's.fees,occurring, arising,.or resultingfrom_supp]yillg wor1c,~JYjc_~,-_
-2-
.
14
. materials or supplies in connection with the performance of this Contract or Subcontract thereof.
6. Breach.
A. Inthe event of either party's material breach of the terms or conditions of this
Contract, the non-breaching party reserves the right to withhold payments or services until corrective
action has been taken or completed. However, the party shall not exercise this right until it has given
written notice of such material breach to the breaching party and ten days have passed since the
receipt of such notice.
B. If either party shall materially breach any of the covenants undertaken herein
or any of the duties imposed upon it by this Contrac!, such material breach shall entitle the other
party to terminate this Contract, provided that the party desiring to terminate for such cause shall
give the offending party at least twenty days' written notice, specifying the particulars wherein it is
. claimed that there has been a violation hereof, and if at the end of such time, the party notified has
not removed the cause of complaint, or remedied the purported violation, then the termination of this
Contract shall be deemed complete.
C. The rights stated above are in addition to and not in lieu of all other rights and
remedies which State law offers for breach or default.
7. Non-Discrimination. United Way shall conduct its business in a manner which
assures fair, equal and non-discriminatory treatment of all persons, without respect to race, creed or
national origin, and, in particular:
~
A. United Way shall maintain open hiring and employment practices and will
welcome applications for employment in all positions, from qualified individuals who are members
, of minorities protected by federal equal opportunity/affmnative action requirements; and,
15
requirements in hiring and employment practices and assuring the service of all persons without
discrimination as to any person's race, color, religion, sex, Vietnam era veteran's status, disabled .
veteran condition, physical or mental handicap, or national origin.
8. Independent ContraCtor. The relation created by this Contract is that of independent
contracting entities. United Way is not an agent of the City. United Way, as an independent
contractor, has the authority to control and direct the performance of the details of the services to be
provided. United Way shall control and direct the performance of the details of the services to be
provided. If money for human services is distributed under this Agreement to another agency, that
other agency shall be an independent contractor and not an agent of the City.
9. Entire Contract. The parties agree that this Contract is the complete expression of
the terms hereto and any oral representation or understanding not incorporated herein is excluded.
Further, any modification of this Contract shall be in writing and signed by both parties~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto caused this Contract to be executed the day and
.
year first hereinabove written.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
UNITED WAY
.. .. By:--. - --- -~._.
Karen A. Rogers, Mayor
. .. ------ By:.
Title: Executive Director
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
Title:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
William E. Bloor,
City Attorney
.. ..._.~.G:\Legal~Backup\AGREEMENTS&CON1RACTS\2006 Agmts&Contracts\2006-UnitedWay.con.Ol0406.wpd (Rev JanullI)'l 1,2006)
-4-
.
16
.
United Way of Clallam County - 2006 Citart Angeles Human Services Funding
.
Agency/Program I 2004 P .A. 2005 2006 . 2006 Use of funding Outcomes # Served Program Program
I Recommen. Recommen. Request Recommen. This program Budget Budget
, . (
Boys and Girls Club : $20,000 $0 $0
Family Planning "
Youth Education Program, $10,000 $10,000 $13,000 $10,000 Fund a health educator who will Increased knowledge of teen 550 $13,000 $13,000
facilitate weekly support group pregnancy and STDs, reduced
session in the schools and at number of pregnancies & STDs,
youth agencies, provide high reduction in risky behavior,
school classroom education and improved decision making.
facilitate the Baby Think It Over
program
I
First Step Family Support Center
Drop-In Center (for pare~t support) $13,500 $14,000 $16,900 $14,000 Funds a staffer for drop-in center 5 Families' support systems BOD $14,538 $16,900
afternoons/wk. Gives help, improved, people access needed
resources, referrals, misc. resources, children have positive &
essistance to low income parents stimulating environments to play
i with children age Oe5 years. in. Overall,'families get the help
I they need.
I .
Healthv Families
1) ~ Services: Children & youth $15,000 $17,950 $25,560 $18,000 Support groups for children & Participants learn esteem building 4,943 $514,072 $608,400
su~ groups, Prevention youth victims of domestic violence skills, substance abuse prevention
Education, Crisis Intervention & or sexual assault, education to skills, coping skills. Youth learn
Emergency Shelter ' prevent domestic violence and personal safety education; crisis
2) Dom. Violence Legal Advocate date rape: D.V. crisis intervention intervention when necessary.
.25 FTE " & emergency shelter for D.V. Families are sheltered. Two
: victims. Legal advocate for hundred victims receive legal
, Protection orders, parenting plans, advocacy.
; etc.
.
,
Lutheran Comm. Services
(Parent Line) $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Provide support services to Teach prevention strategies to 950 $29,450 $29,450
Mount Angeles View Family / . families living at Mt. Angeles View reduce violence, child abuse and
Resident Center . public housing - medical, legal, neglect, so families will be good
; domestic violence, home community members and won't be -
ownership, transp., education & asked to leave Ihe neighborhood.
I employment skills
.
. -;-
Olympic Community Action .
1) Health and Dental Care Access $9,500 $10,000 $20,000 $10,000 Provide assistance to low income Less visils to ER, pain & suffering 200 for medical $20,000 $180,000
2) Adu~ Day Care (dementia clients) individuals & families for health are alleviated, clients treated with & dental care,
, care & dental needs. Provide respect. Provide assistance to 20 20 in adult day
respite care for families who care clients in Adult Action (gives badly care
for elderly family m!lmbers with needed respite 10 regular
dementia. caregivers)
,
Page 1 of 3
United Way of Clallam County - 2006 City of Port Angeles Human Services Funding
i
Agency/Program I 2004 P.A. 2005 2006 : 2006 Use of funding Outcomes # Served Program Program
, Recommen. Recommen. Request Recommen. This program Budget Budget
i
Parenting Matters Found.
Parenting Newsletters to all Port no request $18,786 $0 Produce and distribute parenting Increased parenti child bonding, 8746 $18,786 $21,000
Angeles School District pa~ents newsletters'to PA parents. Gives communication. Encourage
i tips on improving peer relations, healthy lifestyles for kids. Teach
I success in school, spotting signs social skills to kids. Good parent
of depression, talking about drugs skiils are critical to the success of
I and alcohol. our children.
Peninsula Community Mental
Health I
Respite Services - Adventure Bound $9,500 $10,000 $19,070 $10,000 Funds 10 non-Medicaid eligible PA Decrease in anger & violent 80 $152,564 $152,564
Summer Program I I kids with social/ behavior behaviors, increased use of
I problems (below 200% poverty problem solving techniques,
, i level) to attend therapeutic children with emotional problems
1 recreational summer program. have constructive social
I I Includes cost of food, transport. interaction. Provides time-out for
I stressed parents.
Peninsula Dispute Reso,tution i
Center
Parenvreen mediation $7,000 $7,000 $8,000 I $7,000 Support for parenVteen mediation Effective communication 68 $5,440 $8,240
Youth / Peer mediation training program and teen mediator increased, durable agreements
I trainings. Covers marketing, reached that reduce risk behavior,
..... salaries, training scholarships, and increased understanding ~etween
00 supplies and overhead. family members, teens have
Increased skills and self esteem.
I , , Promotes non-violent conflict
I I resolution skiils for teens.
Pro Bono Lawyers ,
Legal Assistance (Civil) for Low $3,000 $5,000 , $3,000 Funds used for general office Increase number of clients served. 50 $3,000 $3,000
Income Individuals i overhead and salaries. Also, Help with family law I domestic
i i update software to track client cases - solve problems to prevent
I case status more efficiently. them from further escalating. Help
clients with evictions, collections,
etc.
Serenity House I i ,
Childcare Center at th~ Commons $10,000 $18,000 $10,000 $10,000 Child care, preschool, nutrition, and Children receive high quality child 100 $144;250 $144,250
afterschool program for up to 100 care, adult family members able to
I children of homeless and at.risk seek employment, housing,
I families. Funds supplies, activities, treatment. Helps families break
i field trips, etc. out of poverty.
I :
.
Pef3
.
.
United Way of Clallam County - 2006 Cit.rt Angeles Human Services Funding
.
Agency/Program i 2004 P .A. 2005 2006 2006 Use of funding Outcomes # Served Program Program
! Recommen. Recommen. Request Recommen. This program Budget Budget
Special Needs AdvocacY,Parents !
(SNAP) .
Classes and programs for i $5,000 $2,460 Funds support services for people Participants leam social and 183 $19,502 $42,395
developmentally disabled people with developmental disabilities: independent living skills. Staff and
I Life skills classes, summer volunteers receive better training.
i campout, resource newsletters, Families receive much needed
i Voyagers program. Helps pay for respite.
: supplies, outings, and camp
I scholarships
St. Andrew's Place !
I $5,000 $0 Funds support affordable housing Funds will help Sl. Andrews accept 63 $1.2 million $1.2 million
i for seniors - basic necessities plus more low income seniors on
I health and safety assistance, Medicaid by subsidizing the cost of
wellness activities, etc. their housing, care, and activities.
Volunteer Chore Services of
Clallam County i
i $12,000 $0 Funds office assistant at 20 hours Serve more clients, recruit new 60 $39,473 $75,000
per week, which will help bring in volunteers in outlying areas, form
more volunteers (more promotion, more community relationships with
.... advertising, more calls and better delivery of services.
~ dispatches handled). Also,
recimbursement of volunteers'
. mileage.
Volunteers in Medicine of the
Olympics Clinic (VIMO)
Free Medical Clinic for uninsured and $10,000 $5,000 Purchase prescription drugs for Patients received needed 424 $34,872 $50,112
underinsured citizens clinic dispensing (antibiotics, medication, will get well and not
: urgent care drugs) and subsidize resort to E.R. treatment or develop
costs of Rx drugs for the neediest worsening conditions. Helps
patients. patients meet out of pocket costs
of care.
YMCA
Combined Youth Programming $18,000 $25,000 $27,800 $25,000 Funding supports fee subsidies for Childcare and youth programs for 7,180 $1,245,584 $1,571,053
low income families, supports families regardless of ability to pay.
I youth programs (arts, sports, Youth develop self esteem,
! fitness, day camps, and teen stronger character and
center). accountability, leadership skills.
I
Program Totals $122,500 $124,950 $206,116 $124,460 , 24,197 $2,254,531 $2,915,364
United Way Administration - 2% $2,500 $2,550 $2,540
Total from the City $125,000 $127,500 $127,000
Page 3 of 3
.
.
.
20
United
Way
~
-
United Way
of Clallam County
Steve Moriarty. 2005 Board President
The United Way of Clallam County has been a major sourc~ of
support and coordination for health and human services in our county.
This annual report shows what the organization, with your help,
accomplished last year.
In addition to the successful annual campaign, the Healthy
Communities Initiatives and the Community Foundation, we hired our
first new Executive Director in over 20 years. This process involved
United Way board and community members and was a focus of our
energy for the entire year.
We were fortunate in finding a wonderful new leader - Cheryl Baumann. She has the
passion, energy and commitment to move United Way forward and help us maintain and build on
all we've accomplished. Our theme this year is "You can SEE the difference through the United
Way." I'm looking forward to showing you the many ways you help our community through the
United Way of Clallam County.
Gary Kriedberg . 2004 Board President
Last year we asked what you were willing to do for our community
through United Way. You answered us loud and clear: we'll give money,
we'll give time to community projects, we'll leave part of our estates to the
Community Foundation. This report shows your contributions in greater
detail. .
The annual campaign raised over $900,000 which will be used to fund
programs in 2005/06. A very significant change was that 500 more people
gave this year than the previous year. The Community Foundation received a $500,000 bequest.
Earnings will be used to benefit students in Forks, Clallam Bay, Sekiu and Neah Bay. And the Healthy
Communities Initiatives are stronger and more active than ever.
None of this happens without your help. Thank you for responding so positively and clearly.
What are you willing to do? Obviously a lot!
2
"" ,,~., l'* ~>w; i-M~"1''''
~',&.r.:~~";I'tlY'
Our Mission
To strengthen our community by helping people
to live safe, healthy, and productive lives.
. United Way of Clallam County does what no
other oganization can: Brings us together as
a community to impact the issues we really
care about.
. United Way of Clallam County invests your
donations right here in Clallam County, touch-
ing the lives of more than half of the people
who live here.
. United Way of Clallam County makes a
greater difference than any single
organization can through partnerships with
foundations, government, schools, the faith
communities, businesses, and other non-
profit agencies.
Our Goals
. To be a constructive voice for human service
needs in Clallam County.
. To remain the premier fund raising group in our
community for human services needs.
. To help people give to our community.
"We are working hard to become a healed, healthy family."
-a mother of three helped by United Way-funded Lutheran Community Services.
3
UNITED WAY OF CLALLAM COUNTY:
2005 GOVERNMENT FUNDING
AGENCY I PROGRAM
Clallam County Family YMCA
Youth Programming
Concerned Citizens
Forks Teen Center
Dungeness Valley Health Clinic
Free Clinic
Family Planning of Clallam County
Youth Education Program
Youth Suicide Prevention
First Step Family Support Center
Drop-In Center
Forks Abuse Program
Domestic Violence Intervention/Prevention
Healthy Families of Clallam County
Core Services
Domestic Violence Support Group
Lutheran Social Services
Support Services for Families at Mt Angeles Vie
Olympic Community Action Programs
Health Care Access and Adult Day Care
Peninsula Community Mental Health Center
Respite Care for Families with Children
Children & Family Services
Suicide Prevention
Peninsula Dispute Resolution Center
ParentlTeen Mediation and Restorative Justice
Pro Bono Lawyers
Legal Assistance for Low Income Individuals
Serenity House of Clallam County
Childcare at Family Village
Homeless Teen Program
PROGRAM TOTALS
City of Port Angeles
Human Services Fund
· Distribution of sales
tax dollars for health
and human service
. rreeds of Port Angeles
area residents
· Emphasis on youth,
families, and preven-
tion services
· Council member Grant
Munro is liaison with
United Way
City of Sequim Human
Services Funding
. Distribution of tax
dollars for health and
human service needs
of Sequim area
residents
· Emphasis on early
childhood development
and access to physical
and mental healthcare
· Council members
Patricia Kasovia-
Schmitt and John
Beitzel are liaisons
with United Way
Clallam County Local
Government Initiative
Funds
· Distribution of local
capacity funds for
health and human
service needs
throughout the county
· Emphasis on
prevention of domestic
violence, youth
violence, substance
abuse, and suicide
· County Health and
Human Services
Director JoAnne Dille is
liaison with United Way
United Way of
Clallam County
guarantees an
annual allocation to
our partner agencies
based on the agency's
request, funds avail-
able, the agency's
needs, priority of
community needs and
the agency's ability to
meet those needs.
The agency, in turn,
agrees to provide a
service that meets
a need in our county,
submit requested
financial information,
use allocated funds in
accordance with the
request submitted to
United Way, and follow
United Way's non-
discrimination policy
regarding allocated
funds.
PARTNER AGENCY FUNDING
BOARD
ALLOCATION
American Red Cross, Oly Pen
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Oly Pen
Camp Fire, Juan de Fuca Council
(
Childrens Hospital Foundation
Clallam Americorps
CB/Sekiu Crisis Center
Clallam County FamilyYMCA
Concerned Citizens
Diversified Resource Center
Family Planning of Clallam County
First Step Family Support Center
Forks Abuse Program
Forks Food Bank
Girl Scouts Totem Council
Healthy Families of Clallam County
Lutheran Com. Services Parent Line
Olympic Com. Action Programs
Peninsula Dispute Resolution Center
Peninsula Com. Mental Health Center
Pro Bono Lawyers
Salvation Army
Serenity House of Clallam County
Special Needs Advocacy Parents
StAndrews Place
Volunteer Chore Services
Clallam Community Foundation
Boys & Girls Club Fund
Mac Ruddell Fund
United Way Fund
Healthy Communties
2-1-1
Access to Health Care
Literacy
Reach Out & Read
Agency Subtotals
AGENCY TOTALS
$ 9,000
25,000
10,500
1,500
5,000
6,000
20,000
16,000
o
15,000
17,000
16,350
9,000
2,500
14,350
6,800
19,000
7,000
28,400
10,500
16,800
25,800
5,000
2,000
4,000
7,500
$300,000
45,000
$ 45,000
$345,000
DONOR
DESIGNATIONS TOTAL
$ 4,799 $13.799
32,598 57,598
6,139 16,639
8,648 10,148
3,315 8,315
3,596 9,596
13,611 33,611
7,466 23,466
132 132
11,557 26,557
14,171 31,171
10,970 27,320
8,993 17,993
1,527 4,027
15,002 29,352
6,960 13,760
6,954 25,954
5,560 12,560
13,562 41,962
5,265 15,765
11,518 28,318
12,543 38,343
4,261 9,261
4,438 6,438
1,509 5,509
5,238 12,738
$220,332 $520,332
1,000 1,000
8,497 8,497
130 130
3,600 48,600
430 430
6,559 6,559
8,161 8,161
1,250 1,250
$ 20,000 $ 65,000
$249,959 $594,959
United Way of
Clallam County does
not charge partner
agencies any member-
ship fees or dues. 100%
of donor designations
are paid to partner
agencies.
United Way of
Clallam County accepts
contributions designated
to any health and
human care agency,
including those
agencies which are not
partners with United
Way. A 7% fee is
deducted from desig-
nations to non-partner
agencies.
During the 2004
fundraising campaign,
donors asked that
their contributions be
forwarded to the
specific agencies listed
here (amounts listed
are net dollars to
agency).
NON-PARTNER AGENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
AGENCY # GIVERS
Adoption Advocates International I
Alzheimer's Assn ofWestWA 4
American Cancer Society 12
American Diabetes Association I
American Heart Assn Pacific Mtn. 2
ARC of the OlympiC Peninsula I
Bethany Pentacostal Church 2
Boys Scouts, Chief Seattle Council 21
Calvary Chapel of Forks I
Calvary Chapel of Port Angeles I
Calvary Chapel of Sequim 2
Care Net Pregnancy Center 33
Clallam County 4-H 4
Clallam County Humane Society 12
Clinica de la Raza I
Collings Foundation I
Compassionate Friends I
Dungeness Valley Health
& Wellness Clinic
Eastern Hills Community Church
Fairview Bible Church
Faith Lutheran Church
First Baptist Church of Sequim
First Christian Church
Forks Elks Lodge
Forks Hospital Foundation
Forks Search & Rescue
Fred Hutchinson Cancer
Research Center
Friends of Forks Animal Shelter
Friends of Reath Ellofson
Habitat for Humanity
Dungeness Valley
Hospice of Clallam County
Hurricane Ridge Public
Development Authority
Hurricane Ridge Ski Patrol
Jefferson AIDS Services
Juan de Fuca Festival of the Arts
Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
Lupus Foundation of
America PNW Chapter
Martha & Mary
NAMI Clallam County
National Multiple Sclerosis
Society, Greater WA Ch
Northwest Kidney Centers Found.
Northwest Public Radio
Olympic Christian School
Olympic Lions Foundation
Olympic Theatre Arts
Operation Uplift
AGENCY
PAARC
Parenting Matters Foundation
Peninsula Chamber Singers
Peninsula Friends of Animals
Planned Parenthood of Western WA 2
Port Angeles Education Foundation 17
Port Angeles Food Bank 4
Queen of Angels 4
Rainshadow Nat'l Science Found. 2
Ronald McDonald House 2
SARC-Sequim Aquatic Rec Center I
Sequim Early Learning Center I
Sequim Education Foundation 5
Sequim Food Bank 2
Sequim Little League I
Sequim Valley Foursquare Church 2
St Luke's Episcopal Church 3
St.Vincent de Paul - Sequim 5
St Vincent de Paul .Port Angeles 4
Susan G. Komen Foundation I
The Caring Place 10
The Marrow Foundation (NMDP) 2
West End Youth League 9
West Olympic Council for the Arts I
World Wildlife Fund 2
Non.Partner Subtotals 304
Olympic Medical Center
Combined Fund Drive
OMC ACS Relay for Life
OMC Charities
OMC Employee Activity Com.
OMC Foundation
OMCares
OMC All Charities
OMC A encies Subtotals
Other United Ways
UGN of Jefferson County
Other United Wa Subtotals
TOTAL DESIGNATIONS
Goal Three. . .
To help people give to our comlnullity.
FUNDING PARTNERSHIPS
Communities That
Care: Port Angeles
· United Way is the
fiscal agent for
this University of
Washington pro-
ject to promote
healthy youth
development
· More than 100
families partici-
pated in parent
training classes
for families
with pre-teen
children.
· 2005 program-
ming will include
after school
tutoring and
drug abuse pre-
vention classes
at Port Angeles
middle schools
The Albert Haller
Foundation
· Haller Foundation
funded programs
serve the poor
and needy in
Clallam County.
· United Way
assists in the
application
process and
makes recom-
mendations to
the Haller Board
· $80,000 was
distributed to
local programs in
2004 - $28,100
education/schools,
6
$26,650 basic
needs, $9,000
medical, $3,000
special needs,
$4,750 families
and children,
$5,000 capital
projects, $3,500
United Way
Federal Emergency
Management
Agency Emergency
Food and Shelter
Program (EFSP)
United Way chaired
the local EFSP
board and served
as administrative
agent
· In 2004, $34,688
was distributed
to Clallam County
agencies for
emergency food,
rent and utilities
assistance
· One-third of
funds were spent
in the Forks and
Clallam Bay/Sekiu
areas
Clallam Community
Foundation
· United Way
sponsors and
administers the
Foundation
· Eight donor
advised funds .
· Three charitable
gift annuities
· Bequest from
Chuck Applegate
to United Way
Fund
· Bequest from
Roger Hull to
endow Donor
Advised Fund
· 2005 Foundation
Partners are:
-Boys & Girls Clubs
of the Olympic
Peninsula
-Clallam County
Family YMCA
-Dungeness Valley
Health and Wellness
Clinic
-First Step Family
Support Center
-North Olympic
Timber Action
Committee
-Peninsula
Community Mental
Health Center
-Port Angeles Food
Bank
-Serenity House of
C1allam County
-St. Andrew's Place
Assisted Living
-United Way of
C1allam County
· Foundation
balance at
March 31, 2005
is $1,765,174.
~
.
The following grants were made in 2004 from
these donor advised funds:
The Bright Haygood Copsey Fund
· $500 scholarship to Port Angeles High School
graduate who was involved with the band
program
Community Service At Work Fund
· $500 scholarship to Port Angeles High School
graduate
The Hillside Fund
· Two grants totaling $600.
Mac Ruddell Community Fund
· Three scholarships totaling $6,000.
· Three grants totaling $4,500.
Michael Sindars Scholarship Fund
· $2,000 continuing scholarship
The Whatton Family Fund
· $5,000 to the United Way annual campaign,
designated to Dungeness Valley Health &
Wellness Clinic, First Step Family Support
Center, PAARC Clinic, Peninsula Community
Mental Health Center, United Way of Clallam
County.
The Community Foundation received one new
donor advised fund:
The Hull Family Fund will provide scholarships
and teacher/school grants in the Quillayute Valley
and Cape Flattery School Districts.
"Serenity House is a blessing in disguise.
Living there was the first step in a long journey of healing. "
-a former homeless person assisted at Serenity House, a United Way-funded agency
to
United Way
of Clallam County
/0
INCOME
Annual Fund Drive
Transfers from Foundation
Contributions to Foundation
Local Government Contracts
Grants
Interest Income
Other Revenues
Reserves
TOTAL INCOME
DISTRIBUTIONS
United Way Allocations and
Donor Designations
Partner Agency
Healthy Communities
Non-Partner Agency
Combined Federal Campaign
Government Contracts
Donor paid directly to Agencies
Distributions from Foundation
Clallam Community Foundation
Designations to Foundation
Anticipated Overhead
Administration
Campaign
State & National Dues
Foundation
TOTAL EXPENSES
$ 917,148
47,525
578,334
203,990
3,340
4,716
7,985
37,405
$1,800.443
$529,959
65,000
94.340
35,938
199,910
26,983
22,525
578,334
165,955
69,700
8,264
3,535
$1,800,443
2.90/0
OTHER
51.00/0
13.80/0
32.10/0
54.10/0
7
United
Way
"You were so supportive when I had nobody on my
side. I just want to say thank you because you laid
the foundation for my success. What you do for
a living changed my life and the life of my children."
m
..
United Way
of Clallam County
p.o. Box 937
Port Angeles, WA 98362
(360) 457-3011
www.unitedwayclallam.org
1
....
-a parent assisted by First Step Family Support Center,
a United Way-funded agency.
200412005
Officers and
Board Members
Steve Moriarty, President
Norm Schaaf, Vice
President
Gary Kriedberg,
Past President
Michael Quinn, Treasurer
Kristin Glenn,
2004 Campaign Chair
Jessica Schreiber and
Steve Methner, 2005
Campaign Co-Chairs
Marie Angier
Simon Barnhart
Ray Beighle
Marcia Bingham
Joyce Cardinal
Jerry Clarke
Gary Cohn
Bill Collins
John David Crow
Capt. Mark D'Andrea
Sarah De Bey
Lisa Divelbiss
Dick Ecker
Karen Goschen
Carol Huard
8
Donna Hudson
Phil Kitchel
Marty Konopaski
Allison Kriedberg
Marilyn Kuest
Michael Luehrs
LeRoy Martin
Sue McGill
Rochelle McHugh
Erika Meyer
Carmel Middletent
Kathy Murphy-Carey
Stacie Neff
Bill Peach
Capt. Bill Peterson
Jim Pickett
Mike Quinn
Rebecca Redshaw
Sue Ellen Riesau
Lyndsey Roos
Judy Sensintaffar
Abby Siefer
John Skow
Tina Smith-O'Hara
Pat Soderlind
Tony Steadman
Steve Tharinger
Pastor Mike Vanproyen
Frank Walter
Rod Weekes
Staff & Contractors
Cheryl Baumann,
Executive Director
Patty Hannah,
Executive Director,
Retired
Nola Grier,
Internal Operations
Manager
Jody Moss,
Healthy Communities
Coordinator
Pari Gill, Healthy
Communities
Coordinator, Retired
Jim Hallett, CFP, ChFC,
CLU, COP, RFC,
Financial Advisor
Ruth Marcus,
Publicity & Marketing
: CLALLAM COUNTY COMMUNITY PROFilE
I
United
Way
m
..
United Way
of ClaUam County
INFORMATION GATHERED AS A TEAM EFFORT...
In 1998, U~itedWay of
Clallam County
launched a Healthy
Communities Initiative to
encourage collaborative
action and efficient use of
resources. County lead-
ers joined forces with
United Way as a team to
develop a plan of action.
This 2005 Commun-
ity Profile is intended to
help identify our strengths
and weaknesses as a com-
munity. It indicates our
health, our basic needs,
and the condition of our
families.
This Community
Profile is compiled using
public data and repre-
sents a broad range of
quantitative measures. It
is a "road map" for pro-
fessional caregivers, vol-
unteers, parents, city and
county officials, and
citizens concerned about
our community.
Healthy Commun-
ities' mission is to help
make our community a
better place to work,
raise a family, retire and
enjoy Iife.Working
together we can accom-
plish this mission.
Demographics:
how we
look as a
community
Clallam County 2004 Population 65,900
AGE MEN WOMEN
85 years +
80 to 84
75 to 79
70 to 74
65 to 69
60 to 64
55 to 59
50 to 54
45 to 49
40 to 44
35 to 39
30 to 34
25 to 29
20 to 24
15 to 19
10 to 14
5 to 5
<5
6%
4%
2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
PERCENT OF TOTAL POPULATION
Source: 2000 U.S. Census
WA Office of Financial Mgmt., population estimate
~ Our Race & fthnicity
~ CLALLAM COUNTY
White 89.1%
Black or African American 0.8
American Indian
or Alaskan Native 5.1
Asian 1.1
Some other race 3.8
Hispanic or Latino 3.4
Population Growth
CLALLAM COUNTY WASHINGTON STATE
56,210 4,866,669
65,900 6,167,800
. .
WASHINGTON STATE
81.8%
3.2
1990
2004
. . -
u .
t ~ I t
c i
1.6
5.5
7.9
7.5
14.7% Increase
21.1 % Increase
Source: 2000 U.S. Census
Our Age
40.3% of C1allam County Residents are 50 years and older
according to the 2000 U.S. Census
Above map shows percentage of people 50 and older in each area
of Clallam County
2
Poverty
12.5% of Clallam County Residents
live at, or below, the Poverty Level
according to the 2000 Census.
Above map shows percentage of poverty in each area
of Clallam County.
Income
Clallam County
Washington
Clallam County
Washington
MEDIAN
HOUSEHOLD PER CAPITA
INCOME* INCOME**
2000 2000
$32,268 $24,326
50,152 31,230
2004 2002
$41,108 $26,959
51,762 32,638
*Washington State Office of Financial Mgt. (OFM)
"U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Livable Income
(income needed for self-sufficiency)
2004
In Clallam County, based on
a family with 2 parents
and 2 children
$38,3 14
Source: Washington State Kids Count
2001
Average Monthly Wage
MONTHLY
HOURLY
Clallam County
Washington State
$2,105
3,122
$12.17
18.05
Source: WA Kids Count
Pe~ple in Clallam County Living in Poverty
1990 2000
17.4% 17.6%
People under 18
Female-headed households
with related children under 18
50.5%
8.5%
42.2%
6.8%
People 65 and over
Source: u.s. Census 2000
Free and reduced lunches in our schools
Based on 2003 data, 41 % of our students are
receiving this service, whereas on a state level,
37% received this service in 2003.
Above map shows percentage of free and
reduced-price lunches by School District in Clallam County.
.Source: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OS PI)
E.mployment
Average Annual Unemployment Rates for Clallam County
and Washington State, 1990-2004
12
10
Cll
~
0
LL 8
....
0
.0
.1
-- 6
0
Cll
H 4
c
Cll
~
Cll
c... 2
_ Clallam County
-- Washington State
o
1990 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 01 02 03 04
Source:WA State Employment Security Dept.
WORKFORCE (Clallam County) DEC. 2001
No. of people in the workforce 24,020
No. of people employed 22,150
DEC. 2004
26,960
25,360
3
Child Abuse & Neglect
..(lII). ..{III!!.
Children put in foster
care due to neglect 41 48
Parental rights
terminated due to
abuse & neglect 6 41
Source: Office of the Administration of the Courts
Family Violence
_.{IIIII. ..{III..
Clallam County Superior Court
Protection Orders
Requested 257 260
DV Homicides in
Clallam County 2
DV Abuser Suicides
in Clallam County 0
Source: Office of the Administrator of the Courts,
WA State DomesticViolence Fatality Review
Families with Children
Families with children
Married-couple families with
own children under 18
Female-headed household
with children under 18
24.7%
6.2%
Grandparents raising grandchildren:
# of grandparents with own grandchildren
under 18 years old in household
Number of grandparents completely
responsible for grandchildren (parent
absent or incapacitated)
84,592
49,251
(58%)
Source: u.s. Census 2000
Who's Caring for Clallam's Children?
_.(IIII.
".{III).
Estimated number of children in
"care zone" (younger than 13 years,
with parents working)
6,067
6,042
Total licensed childcare slots
_.{IIII.
1,394
".{IIIl'!.
1,322
Source:WA State Child Care Resource & Referral Network
Infant
Toddler
Pre-School
State
$650
650
542
*Highest county rate in Washington State
Source:WA State Child Care Resource & Referral Network
Clallam County Maternal
and Child Health
1991-93
2001-03
Number Number
Rate per year Rate per year
Moms Who Smoke During Pregnancy 25% (:I: 2.2) 164 24% (:I: 2.3) 144 ....
Late or No Prenatal Care 1.6% (:I: 0.6) II 3% (:I: 2.2) 17 ...
Low Birthweight (<2500g) 3.4% (:I: 0.8) 23 3.4% (:I: 0.9) 20
Medicaid Paid Maternity Care 47% 342 61% 370 ...
General Fertility Rate (15-44 years)* 65 (:I: 2.8) 696 58 (:I: 2.7) 602 ....
Births to Moms 15-17Years* 31 (:I: 6.8) 38 14 (:I: 3.9) 19 ....
*Rate per 1,000 women. Source:WA State Dept. of Health, Center for Health Services
5
Supporting
Mental
and
Emotional
Health
~ The BRFSS is
a telephone
survey of
adults conducted to
collect data on personal
health behaviors on
local, state, and national
levels. A BRFSS survey
was conducted in Clallam
County between April
2003 and March 2004.
913 residents were
surveyed. The chart
shown here represents
a few of the questions
asked of individuals.
You may find more
information at:
www.c1allam.net/healthservices
SUICIDE
HOTLlNES:
(800) 273- TALK
(800) 273-8255
Youth Suicide Line
(877) 968-8454
Hours: 24 HOUR
http://www.suicide-
preventionlifeline.org
6
QUESTION
Mental Health
How adults rate their
general health?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Adults limited in activities because
of physical, mental or emotional
problems
Adults who, before they were 18,
experienced any type of physical
or sexual abuse or witnessed
a parent being abused
Adults who are either often
bothered by feeling down or
depressed or who often
experience little interest
or pleasure in doing things
II!II
Washington
2003
Percent
22% (:I: 1%)
35% ((:I: 1%)
30% (:I: 1%)
10% (:1:1%)
4% (:I: 1%)
24% (:1:1%)
Source: Clallam County Health and Human Services, Clallam County 2003-04 Behavioral Risk Factor
Surveillance System (BRFSS) Survey.
SuiciCle$"by~ge (SroUI>
4' w, ,~1!l0l!if;/V#. "!# .. 0
Rates per"OO;OOO; colculated for (2 3-)';li!
II '$ .f
Clallam
Age Group
Avg.#
Per Year
Rat~
ql~~
;11I
L '"
ill
E
m M
E
e III!
Source: WA State Dept of Health. Center for Health Statistics.
iiciiilii" ""1ijj
Clallam
II v200:J~0'
i!.~~ent;,
n "1i
..
IIIiI I
2~%I(t 3%)
~Q~Jl(:l:31)~
~2~ (~~~) '\ \Ii
10%'(:1: 2%) !Ill
~%'lI!(:tq'1%)
~4l
E ~
.
111
IIIJ
::'
..
Helping
Children
Succeed
High School Graduates
by School District
Clallam County, Washington 2003-04
(Washington State = 76.2%)
W ASL Scores
Percent of 4th Graders who met the Reading Standard
by School District
Clallam County, Washington 2003-04
(Washington State = 74.4%)
N/A
Source: Office of Superintendent for Public Instruction
WASL Scores
Percent of 10th Graders who met the Reading Standard
by School District
Clallam County, Washington 2003-04
(Washington State = 64.6%)
N/A
Source: Office of Superintendent for Public Instruction
7
Physical
Health
and Safety
r.r The chart
- -
shown here
represents a
few of the questions
asked during the 2003-
2004 BRFSS telephone
survey. You may find
more information at:
www.c1allam.net/healthservices
BRFSS QUESTION
Smoking
Adults who smoke cigarettes
Weight, Physical Activity,
Safety in the Home
Weight c1assipcatians based an 8MI
Not overweight (Body Mass Index < 25)
Overweight (Body Mass Index 25-29)
Obese (Body Mass Index> 30)
Adults meeting recommended guidelines
for moderate physical activity
(at least 30 min.. 5 or more days per week)
Adults with loaded and unlocked firearms
in or around the home
'I
I
Washington
2003
Percent
20% (:I: 1%)
"
38% ~(:I: 4%)
ill 39%"I'(t4~)
23%'(:1: 3%)
42% (:I: 1%)
37% (:I: 1%)
22% (:I: 1%)
54% (:I: 1%)
Source: Clallam County Health and Human Services. Clallam County 2003-04 Behavioral Risk Factor
Surveillance System (BRFSS) Survey.
'lluW
t,o Motor ~~h;Gle A!Ecident1..~~ITP.~~)~
Jci~~fo!~C(t-yest!. Y #. iii mil',
III
8
Leading
Causes
of Death
Top Ten Leading Causes of Death
Rates per 100,000, calculated for a 3-year period.
Clallam County Avg.# Washington
Rank Type of Death Rate 2001-03 Per Year Rate 2001-03
All cause mortality 799.5 (:t 33) 805 790.4
I Heart disease 191.1 (:t 16) 200 195.8
2 Malignant neoplasms (cancer) 190.6 (:t 16) 194 191.6
Colon cancer 18.0 ( :t 5) 19 17,7
Lung cancer 48.3 ( :t 8) 50 55.2
Breast cancer (in women) 25.8 ( :t 9) 14 24.0
Prostate cancer (men) 23.8 ( :t 9) II 28.0
3 Cerebrovascular disease (stroke) 76.6 (:t 10) 83 65.1
4 Diabetes related mortality 66.1 ( :t 9) 70 75.8
5 Accidents 49.7 (:t 10) 38 36.0
Motor vehicle accidents 22.4 ( :t 7) 16 12.1
6 Chronic lower respiratory disease 42.0 ( :t 8) 46 47.7
7 Alzheimer's disease 37.6 ( :t 7) 41 39.0
8 Suicide 20.3 ( :t 7) 14 12.8
9 Influenza and Pneumonia 18.4 ( :t 5) 19 17.2
10 Infectious and parasitic diseases 10.6 ( :t 4) 10 13.9
Source: WA State Dept of Health, Center for Health Statistics.
Source: WA State Dept of Health. Center for Health Statistics.
9
Access to
Health
Care
1:r The chart
- -
shown here
represents a
few of the questions
asked during the 2003-
2004 BRFSS telephone
survey. You may find
more information at:
www.c1allam.net/healthservices
QUESTION
Access to Care
Adults 18-64 years with health insurance
Adults 18-64 years without health insurance
Adults who visited a doctor for a checkup
in the past year
Adults who were unable to see a doctor
in the past year due to cost
Source: Clallam County Health and Human Services. Clallam County
2003-04 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Survey.
Washington
2002
Percent
87% (:1:2%)
13% (:1:2%)
10
Meeting the Challenge
-niS 2005 Community Profile, has given you a glimpse of the
needs, services, and condition of our lives in Clallam County.
In comparing the county statistics with the statistics of Washington
State, you can see how we stand in relation to the larger community.
There are areas where we are doing quite well, and there are areas
where we can improve.
In considering ourselves as a people who are committed to the
well-being of everyone of our neighbors, and by using the statistics in this
Profile, a few goals that will help us improve the quality of life in C1allam
County are:
· Ensure all people in Clallam County have adequate housing, food,
clothing, and access to short-term emergency services as necessary.
· Ensure all families and individuals in Clallam County are safe,
emotionally healthy and stable, and have the knowledge and skills to
achieve their full potential as members of our community.
· Ensure all people in Clallam County have access to adequate mental
health services enabling them to realize their full potential for
wellness and health.
· Ensure all children and youth in Clallam County have the opportuni-
ties and resources to grow into socially responsible, economically
productive and caring adults.
· Ensure all people in C1allam County have access to preventive,
primary, emergent, and specialized medical and dental care in order
to live healthy and safe lives.
11
Finding Additional Information. ..
United Way
www.unitedwayclallam.org
United Way InfoLink (Information & Referral Assistance)
www.unitedwayinfo.org · 1-800-627-0335
Clallam County Health & Human Services (CCHHS)
www.c1allam.netlhealthservices
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (for health data)
www.clallam.netlhealthservices/htm/brfss.htm
www.cdc.gov/brfss
United
Way
m
-
United Way
of Clallam County
P.O. Box 937
Port Angeles, WA 98362
(360) 457-3011
www.unitedwayclallam.org
Clallam County Health and Human Services
223 E. 4th Street, Suite 14
Port Angeles, WA 98362
C360) 417-2303
www.clallam.net/healthservices
12
.
~..
~
FORTANGELES
CITY OF
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
MARCH 7, 2006
To:
CITY COUNCIL l
SCOTT K. JOHNS j I(
FINAL ApPRO V AL OF ENINSULA VILLAGE PRD/SUBDIVISION
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Summary: The final approval of a 32 lot Planned Residential Development in the Residential
High Density RHD zone.
Recommendation: Following discussion with the applicant regarding an acceptable location
for the play area, the City Council should waive the second reading of the ordinance and
authorizefinal approval of the Peninsula Village Planned Residential Development and
subdivision with the 5 conditions, 15 findings, and 16 conclusions attached as Attachment A.
. Back2Tound / Analysis:
The Peninsula Village Planned Residential Development/subdivision is located at the
southeast corner of Golf Course Road and Lindberg Road. On February 22, 2006, the Planning
Commission reviewed the final planned residential development (PRD) and subdivision and found
... _..~-----~-that the applicant had-essentiallymetthe preliminary cbnditionsof apprbval-mainlybecause"the-
remaining improvements are to be bonded. Wark that has been done has been inspected and has
been found to meet the City's standards and the conditions of approval.-The-preliminary...
conditions of approval and how they were met are attached for Council review.
During the Planning Commission's review, it was noted that construction practices with
regard to erosion and sedimentation control on the site were less than acceptable and Condition
No.5 was added to address this issue. Site visits following the February 22, 2006, meeting were
made by the City's engineering staff and the project was brought into compliance per the added
condition. Additionally, Condition No.4 was modified to include wording to ensure that if the
erosion and sedimentation controls are found to fall short of what is required during the life of the
project, work shall cease until the required measures are brought up to par. The property owner is
working with inspectors to ensure that control measures that were placed remain in place although
some vandalism has already occuned. The site is in compliance as of the writing of this
memorandum.
Following the Plarnling Commission's review, a fmal site plan was submitted but it
contains a revision that is of concern: location of the play area. The play area was originally
-shown under the BOill1eville PowerlineAuthority {BP Ayea.-sement and was moved in-a.nticipation
. that BP A would not allow such an activity in that location. However, the new location does not
appear to meet the intent of having such an area in the PRD as it is at the far end of the site and not
21
really an integral part of the development. It appears more as an afterthought. Staff would
recommend that the lot be located which may involve the reduction of a lot. Although the issue
could be referred back to the Planning Commission at this point, in order to keep the project .
moving, this discussion can be made with Council as the Council may modify the approval during
this time, and must be made prior to Council's final action.
The City Engineer has approved the bond amount for the development, which covers the
remaining infrastructure work and street trees that were required in the original conditions of
approval. The bond amount is 150% of the cost of the required improvements.
As this application involves a PRD and subdivision approval, the second reading of the
ordinance should be waived in order to meet statutory requirements regarding the subdivision
approval.
Staff will be available for discussion and the applicant will be present at the March 7, 2006
meeting.
Attachments:
Site drawing
Ordinance, conditions, findings, and conclusions in support of approval
Report on compliance with preliminary conditions of approval
February 22, 2006 Minutes excerpt
.
.
22
THE WEST 4.5 ACRES OF THE NORTHeAST OUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
OUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST OUARTER, ANO THE NORTH HALF OF THE
NORTHWEST OUARTER OF SAlO SOUTHWEST OUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
OUARTER OF SEcnON 13, TOWNSHIP JO NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, W.M.,
CLALLAM COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
ma:JU:JIi THEREFROM THE NORTH 20 FEET AND THE WEST JO FEET;
ALSO EXCEPT TH4T PORnON CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
BY DEED RECOROED NOVEMBER 17, 1997 UNOER AUDITOR'S FILE NO.
1997 1000500.
SI1W.TE IN THE COUNTY, OF CLAI.J..AM, STATE DF WASHINGTON.
t
NOTES '
I. ALL LOTS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISIDN' ARE SUBJECT TO AND BENEFIT FROM
TIlE CONOmONS, CONVENANTS, ANO RESTRICnONS INSTRUMENT RECORDED
UNDER CLALLAM COUNTY AUDiTOR'S FILE NUMBER 2005-
I
2. AlL LOTS ARE SUBJE:CT TO AND BENEFIT FROM TIlE CDNnNUOUS AND
PERPE1W.L MAINTENANCE OF COMMON ARE4S, ROADS, ANO UnUTY
E4SEMENTS AS OESCRIBED IN THE I./AINTENANCE AGREEMENT RECORDED
UNDER CLALLAM COUNT( AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2005-
.
~
~
...
~
;1!
~
()
<.>
<:
i2
'"
~
3l
~I
et
""
",'
Cl
~
W
'"
~
i!:
Il:
ji!
o 60 120
~r I I
..
SCALE IN FEET
I\)
~
LEG4L DESCRIPTION
.
I Pe:r;:..insula Village
a Planned Residential Development
, I
o portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest
of Section 13, Township 30 North, Range 6 West,
Clallam County, Washington
I
!
Quarter
W.M.,
t-
I
! 30
I
,
J
",I
~I
s'
8/ '''I~
~ I ~-l
01 ,0
Dr-~
, 1:i
"
I
I
I
I JO
I
! ' -.,,~ "j" I J
I i ~ l~
r I JF
' ~~
/--- .
---
" ~--------
---
--
Lindberg Road
OPBI IPACE.
/1,.St3san
c
.,
~I:J
~
.,...-------,
-,-I I
1 i 4 I ..
I ' 'A5lI san I ~,
I @!!) ! 25
L_--L8S._'"
r--------f
I I
I I
I J ,.ne~n: lti
11/ <E) I -J
,) L_--'88--i
r------_-J
I I
I I
I 2 I
: 5.nl8 so tT I ~
iJ: ~! -J,
I L---~L91__..:!
I r-------,
rr5 I
: 1 :
I u31son: ~
IGiIDI~
l----L9.~_J
:+
I
I
L
I 8
Ii!
c;
::j
---
j;.
,~
IQ
r-:
~
LEGEND
[SS]
INGRESS, EGRESS AND UnLITY EASEMENT WITII A VARYING
WIDTH FROM 60 FEET TO JO FEET TO BENEFIT ALL LOTS
WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION AND TIlE PROPERnES LOCATED
TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBDIVISION
i
IS-FOOT SANITARY SEWER ANO STORM DRAIN E4SEMENT
~
~
~
~
I
@!)
i
ID-FOOT SANITARY SmER E4SEMENT
I
10-FOOT STORM DRAIN E4SEMENT
I
5-FOOT UnLlTY E4SEMENT
I
ADDRESS NUMBER .
BUILDING SETBACK LINE
CLALLAM COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER
296.2B
ARFAS
)J]/
NOTE: REQUlRfD BY THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
TOTAL SfTC ARE4 = 372,J59 SO FT (B.55 ACRES)
TOTAL OPEN SPACE ARE4 = I 11,7J4 SO FT (2.57 ACRES)
TOTAL RECRE4nONAL ARE4 - 1II,7J4 SO FT (2.57 ACRES)
I
ALL RESIOENCES WITHIN, THIS SUBOIVISION SHALL BE FITTED WITH RESIOENTIAL
SPRINKLER SYSTEMS PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY.
L
.
~l
.....
c:
EO
a-:::I
Q.) 'qj lIl'
Q)~Q)
oil>.....
_QO
$-~
,0....
.c
OC:~
- Q) '"
:J~~
lJ)1Il
CQ)o
'- Q:: '-
C Q...
Q.) 'tJ c:-
Q.Q)~
C:Ci
c:
J2l:
Qo
't.;;
o
~
N
:&
c.5
~
--
- ~
t3 ~! !
0:: .f~ !
o ~.... ~
I- ~ i!
~ ii I
w ~ I
I- '0
Z ~~ i
a::: 6~
w -.l ~
t:i ~] ~
~H~
:x: ~~ ~
I- u;E
gs il
:z
O~
0P9f "'ACE
)D2s:an
~
~,
I ~
~~ 8
~ 8 ~
i~ ~
~!;I ..
t:ie -I.
~i ~ "
'H
h~I~I~
d~ :'1"
:al~li
ili!~
.
~,
.
.
24
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
approving the Planned Residential Development known as
Peninsula Village PRD.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Port Angeles has considered the public
interest served by the Planned Residential Development (PRD) known as Peninsula Village PRD;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds, subject to the attached Conditions, Findings and
Conclusions, Peninsula Village PRD provides appropriate adequate provisions for the public
health, safety and general welfare; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the public interest will be served by approval
of Peninsula Village PRD; and
__'YJ'Q~Rg,1\S, tl1~_p~I'o?~nts of Peninsula Village PRD have made appropriate
provision for public improvements as stated in more detail in the attached Conditions, Findings
and Conclusions; and
WHEREAS, the City of Port Angeles Public Works and Utilities Department has
certified that there are adequate means for supplying water and for sewage disposal in the
development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that, as conditioned, Peninsula Village PRD
conforms to all conditions of approval for the PRD, and that said PRD meets requirements of
. u-u----~local and state law.--
- 1 -
25
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
DO ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. The attached Conditions, Findings, and Conclusions hereby are adopted
and incorporated herein.
Section 2. Peninsula Village PRD is hereby approved. The appropriate officers of
the City of Port Angeles are hereby authorized to sign the final PRD documents.
Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days following the
date of its publication by summary.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the _ day of March, 2006.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
PUBLISHED: March . 2006
By Summary
G:\Legw_ BackupIORDlNANCES&RESOLUTIONS\2006-06.Peninsula Village PRD.Subdivision.022806. wpd
.
.
26
- 2 -
.
ATTACHMENT A
. CONDITIONS, FINDINGS, AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF FINAL APPROVAL OF
PENINSULA VILLAGE PRD SUBDIVISION: -_
.
.
Conditions:
1. All conditions of preliminary approval shall remain in effect.
2. Fire hydrants shall be located per the Fire Department requirements.
3. A bond other security measures acceptable to the City attorney in the amount of $206,000
($137,499 X 150%) for completion of infrastructure requirements shall be in place before
final approval is granted.
4. Erosion and sedimentation controls shall be in place and properly maintained throughout the
life of the project. If found to fail, work shall cease until the required measures are in place
per City specifications regarding best management practices and process of the PRD reviews
shall cease until the situation is rectified.
Inspection of the site to ensure that erosion and sedimentation control measures have been
placed per the City's direction shall be done by the City on February 23,2006. Work shall
cease after a 24-hour notification until the required measures are in place per City
specifications regarding best management practices and process of the PRD reviews shall
cease until the situation is rectified. Additionally, if the inspection fails and work is not under
way to correct the short coming, an amount of money shall be set by the City Engineer to
rectify the situation that will be added to the bonding described in Condition 3 such that the
City shall perform the work.
5.
Findings:
1.
Preliminary approval of the PRD and Subdivision was granted on June 1,2004. A request for
---ameridmenCwasreceive-d6nJanliary27;-2006.-------- ----- - _n --- --------------~..
The proposed amendment reduces the number of lots and increases the size of the lots from
tliedesign ofthe-apprbved PRDand subdivision. __,___U --------
Port Angeles Municipal Code (P AMC) Chapter 17.19 sets forth the City's requirements for
the approval of planned residential developments, and P AMC Chapter 16.08 sets forth the
City's requirements for the approval of subdivisions.
The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform
division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire
into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision. It
shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health,
safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including
sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who
on!y ~'ll~t()_an~l~o~_~hool and\\T~~ther!~~_p~~lic interest will be served by the
subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless'-the cify- cali-make Writteii---~- ________.____n_____
findings that these provisions are made.
2.
3.
4.
27
(Peninsula Village Conditions, Findings, and Conclusions
March 7, 2006
Page 2
This Overlay Zone is to provide alternative zoning regulations which permit and
encourage design flexibility, conservation and protection of natural amenities and
critical areas, and innovation in residential developments to those regulations found in
the underlying zone. It is intended that a Planned Residential Development will result
in a residential environment of higher quality than traditionallot-by-Iot development by
use of a design process which includes within the site design all the components of a
residential neighborhood, such as open space, circulation, building types, and natural
features, in a manner consistent with the public health, safety~ and welfare.
The proposed 15-acre Peninsula Village Planned Residential Development (PRD) and
Subdivision site is located on the south side of Lindberg Road and east of Golf Course Road.
The proposed amendment has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning
Code, and Subdivision Ordinance. The Comprehensive Plan land use designations for the site
is High Density Residential (HDR). The approximately 9.3 acre property in the first phase of
the PRD was rezoned to RHD Residential High Density several years ago and is situated
across Lindberg Road from Peninsula Golf Course, which is zoned PBP Public Buildings and
Parks due to its open space characteristics. Other surrounding properties, including the
second phase ofthe PRD, are zoned RS-9 Residential Single Family and either are developed
with low-density residential uses or are undeveloped.
The City's Fire, Public Works, Parks and Recreation, and Community Development
Departments reviewed the proposed amendment to the planned residential development and
subdivision preliminary plat.
The proposal meets the minimum site size for a planned residential development, and only
single family homes, which are permitted uses in the RHD Zone, are proposed.
-~----
10. The City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments currently serve the site.
----11. -Building permits are required fOLalLstructureson any approved buildingJots._AllJocal
Building and Fire Codes apply to any new construction on the subject property.
The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Official issued a Determination of .
Nonsignificance (DNS #1065) on May 7, 2004, satisfying the City's SEPA responsibility.
5.
The purpose of a planned residential development (PRD) is set forth in Section 17.19.010 as
follows:
.
6.
7.
8.
.
9.
12.
13. The applicant has submitted an engineers estimate for completion of improvements required by
Section 16.08.070 PAMC in the amount of$137,499.
14. Section 16.08.050(B)(2) allows the developer to install or assure installation ofthe
improvements required by Section 16.08.070 PAMC by furnishing to the City an assignment
of a savings account or another approved security or placing in trust, an amount equal to
150% of the cost ofthe improvements as determined by the City Engineer, which assignment
of savings account, other security, or trust shall assure to the City the installation of the
improvements, to the satisfaction and approval of the City Engineer.
-~--15.--- Inspection-of the site on February-17,21, and_22,2006,_revealed_thaLerosion and___________________
sedimentation practices on the site do not meet the City's minimum engineering standards. .
The applicant has been notified several times of this shortcoming.
28
Peninsula Village Conditions, Findings, and Conclusions
March 7, 2006
Page 3
. Conclusions:
A. The conditions of the Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision are consistent with the Zoning
Code, required by the Subdivision Ordinance, and necessary to implement the Comprehensive
Plan.
B. As conditioned, all the necessary public improvements will be installed per the City Urban
. Services Standards and Guidelines.
C. As conditioned, the configuration of the proposed subdivision lots and street layouts conform
to the desired urban design of the City for the residential developments in outlying areas
where there is no grid street pattern and low impact development standards are allowed. The
curvilinear private streets and cul-de-sac with a 25 foot paved surface and no parking along
the streets reduce storm water runoff and still provide adequate access for each residential lot.
D. As conditioned, the utility services will be provided consistent with the Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines and the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan level
of service standards. Analysis of downstream sanitary sewer capacity has been provided that
indicates no capacity improvements are needed for the additional 38 units of Peninsula
Village PRD.
E. The small lots proposed for the Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision are desired for
several reasons: 1) the geographical and BP A easement constraints on the site, 2) recovering
City costs for UUD 215,3) the mixed types of housing already located in the zone and
. vicinity, 4) the provision of affordable homes for new families and other first time home
buyers, and 5) the lots satisfy the desired urban design of the City, except for their small size,
which fits the density requirements of the RHD Zone and the PRD Overlay Zone.
F. This is not the basic urban land use pattern for the City's higher density multi-family
residential neighborhoods. The density is much more like a single-family residential
n....-...--iieighborli6oa;andtlie 'streefana 'blocKsysteni is m()f(:niKe6utlyiiigareas~- which are'largely -.~
undeveloped. However, it is not atypical for this zone and vicinity where another small lot,
--...-single-family subdivision in theRHD Zone exists nearby. While it does not-meet the high-__n___._
density purposes of the RHD Zone, it does provide for a higher density single-family
development with surrounding open spaces consistent with the PRD Overlay Zone.
G. The Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision provide an alternative residential development
design to the basic single family residential neighborhood and the basic multi-family
residential neighborhood in a manner that is affordable as starter homes for new families and
other first time home buyers. Conditions are recommended that would satisfy the PRD
standards that are not included in the proposal plans.
H. As conditioned, the Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision amended preliminary plat is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
1. As conditioned, the Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision preliminary plat is in
conformance with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 P AMC, and the
_~l:t~l:1ingt()n State.~ubdivision A.c~,~~~E!~r 58.17.BPYI...__ ..'___n__ _________._ _
. J. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and
general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public
ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds,
. .-
29
Peninsula Village Conditions, Findings, and Conclusions
March 7, 2006
Page 4
K.
schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking
conditions for students who only walk to and from school.
As conditioned, the public interest is served in the preliminary approval of planned residential
development and platting of the subdivision as articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan,
Zoning Code, and Subdivision, Ordinance. The subdivision provides for development of new
homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the Growth Management Act and
beneficial to the City's tax base. The Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision will recover
funds expended by the City in support of UUD 215.
The final drainage plan must be approved by the City Engineer, and the City's stormwater
drainage standards will require that the proposed development not impact downstream
properties anymore than pre-development conditions as requested by Peninsula Golf Course.
The drainage and erosion control plans also are subject to the Department of Ecology NPDES
permit.
The project engineer is working with the Bonneville Power Administration, and BPA's
comments reflect the expectation that the residential uses will be compatible.
The P AMC Chapter 17.19 Planned Residential Development Overlay Zone and Chapter 16.08
Subdivision Regulations allow for variations from standards variations in street
improvements, blocks, lots, and building line setbacks. Conditions are recommended where
certain proposed variation should not be approved due to the small lot design, which allows
for less on-site variation.
The private street system, as allowed for a PRD, is proposed for Peninsula Village to
minimize rights-of-way, stormwater drains, and/or pedestrian facilities that would be required
for public streets. The 25-foot wide paved private streets must be posted for no parking, since
there is not adequate pavement to allow for anything more than service and emergency
vehicle access as well as individual lot access.
1.
M.
N.
O.
P. Immediate construction measures are necessary to correct poor erosion and sedimentation
control on the site. The project is conditioned to direct immediate corrective action prior to
---------autnorization or approvals necessary for-fiillilofthe-PRD.--
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of March 7,2006.
Karen A. Rogers, Mayor
------------ BeckyJ~ Upton; City-Clerk---------- ---------------- ___n -
30
.
.
.
All lots shall be configured to have a minimum lot size of 3,500 square feet or
greater.
All lots are shown to be a minimum of 3,500 square feet.
All necessary on-site easements for access, drainage, and utilities shall be shown
on the final plat.
All easement for access, drainage, and utilities have been shown on the plat.
The stormwater drainage improvements shall be installed or bonded per the City's
Urban Services Standards and Guidelines and consistent with the Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife hydraulics permit application requirements and
the Department of Ecology NPDES permit requirements. The drainage plan for
on-site and off-site facilities shall be approved by the City Engineer.
Storm water drainage improvements have been partially installed. The
remainder of the work has been bonded for.
5. One or more of the community areas shown on the preliminary plat shall be
_ __________ de~ign.~~_,!~__~~child_ren' sJ~!l:ly~~a sil11i!arto t~~_ge~pl1:lX s~ll:c!ll.!~_ at_gro~ Park
prior to final plat approval and shall be installed prior to the issuance of any--------~--
building permits. The final plat shall provide for a minimum of 15% (1.4 acres)
of common usable recreational facilities and a minimum of 30%(2;8 acres) for----~-- -- ------.-.-
common usable open space including land dedicated to recreational facilities per
PAMC Sections 17.19.011 and 17.19.050.
The location of the recreation area was changed during the public hearing for
PRD amendment held on February 22, 2006, before the Planning Commission.
Improvements to the recreation have been bondedfor. The applicant submitted
a drawing revised after Planning Commission approval. The play area location
had been changed on the submitted drawing. The location of the play area
approved bv Planning Commission was located under the BP A power lines and
would not be acceptable to the BPA. The proposed location on the submitted
drawing showed a location well to the south of the main body of proposed lots.
The newly proposed location is not acceptable to staff as being too far away and
isolated from the residential lots.
.
.
Approved Preliminary Conditions applied to the Peninsula Village PRDlsubdivision and
how those conditions have been met.
Conditions:
1. The final plat shall show the building front lot lines drawn where the lots equal or
exceed 50 feet in width; Lots 7 and 16 may need reconfiguration. All external
building line setbacks shall met RHD Zone requirements. All lot lines (solid
lines) and building setback lines (dashed lines) shall be accurately dimensioned
on the final plat.
The front lot lines all meet or exceed 50 feet. All setback lines meet the RHD
zone requireJ11ent.
2.
3.
4.
- - 6.----All exterior and interior streets shall be posted for no.parking, and adequate_ .._
provisions for two off-street parking spaces shall be made on-site for each lot, in
addition to any parking provided elsewhere on the site.
NO PARKING signs will be placed at the completion of street construction.
The remainder dfthe street construction work has been bondedfor.
31
.
The Peninsula Village PRDlsubdivision
Conditions for [mal approval
March 7, 2006
Page 2
.
7. Electrical, telecommunications, and street lighting shall be installed or bonded per
the Light Division standards. Electric utility service shall be underground.
Electrical and telecommunication utilities have been bonded for.
8. No more than 38 dwelling units may be connected to the City's water and sewer
systems without review and approval by the City Engineer demonstrating
adequate system capacities and compliance with ULID 215.
The recently amended site plan indicates 32 residential dwelling units. The City
engineer has reviewed the system capacity.
9. Address numbers shall be identified and placed on the final plat as provided by
the City.
Address numbers have been provided and will be placed on the final plat.
10. The final PRD shall provide for continuous and perpetual maintenance of
common open space, common recreation facilities, private roads, utilities and
utility easements, common parking areas, and other similar development within
the boundaries of the PRD in form and manner acceptable to the City.
A draft copy ofCC&Rs have been submittedfor review.
11. The final PRD and plat approval shall provide conditions, covenants, and
restrictions that will preserve scenic view corridors, both internal and external to
the site, in coordination with the proposed one-story, split-level, and two-story
model home designs to create a residential environment of higher quality than
traditionallot-by-lot development.
A draft copy ofCC&Rs have been submittedfor review.
12. Fire hydrants shall be placed per the project narrative included in the application.
The three hydrants shall be lo~~t~d at: ~e intersection of Golf Course and
Lindberg, at the northeast comer on Lindberg Road and the last midway between
the entrances on the internal road.
-- Location-offire hydrants has-been reviewed by the City's FireM arshalland~--
shall be installed per Fire Department requirements. The installation offire
hydrants has been bonded for.
,
13. Twenty (20) feet of clear width shall be required for fire department access.
The PRD design indicates that all access to all lots will be a minimum of 20 feet
in width.
14. The fire sprinkler system as required by the Fire Department shall be a condition
of any new residential building permit. Wording shall be placed on the final plat
and recorded with the County Auditor upon filing of the final subdivision
indicating that all residences shall be fitted with residential sprinkler systems prior
to occupancy.
Language indicating the need for sprinklers
____._ __15 ._ULID_2J5Assessments_and_sewec connection charges__~h~lLaRPJy_tQ_this__PI.9ject
(date of formation ofULID 215 connection charge was in November 1999). .
ULID 215 assessments are included in the bond amount.
.
32
.
.
'.
The Peninsula Village PRDlsubdivision
Conditions for fmal approval
March 7, 2006
Page 3
16. Proposed 8" water line shall be provided per as shown, with Fire Hydrant
installation at NE Comer of Lindberg Rd. and in the middle of the internal
roadway per City Urban Standards.
Water line installation andfire hydrants are included in the bond amount.
17. Proposed 8" sanitary sewer shall be provided as shown per City Urban Standards,
and line size and detention calculations for proposed storm drain shall be
required. .
Sanitary Sewer construction costs are included in the bond amount.
18. Utility easements are appropriately identified on the preliminary plat map as well
as an access easement to properties located to the south of the subject site, and the
easements shall be legally described for the final approval of the PRD and
Subdivision.
All required utility easements are shown on the face of the plat.
19. Proposed roadway construction, internal roadway inverted crown for drainage,
Lindberg Road construction shall be to 20 foot paved width. Golf Course Road
construction shall be to 24 foot paved width. Roadway construction shall be per
City Urban Standards with ditches and walkways.
Road construction is included in bond amount.
Street trees shall be provided on the frontages of Lindberg and Golf Course Roads
per City approval.
Street tree costs included in bonding amount.
20.
21.
The legal description of the subject property in the first phase of the PRD shall be
provided.
nL(!goJ cJ~s~l~ijJ~ion of~~~~~f!lt!!'(! face o[thl!p!aJ__
--- The applicant requested an amendment to the original PRD approval.- The ------
amendment was heard at public hearing before the Planning Commission on February 22,
2006. The following conditions were added to the PRD approval as part of the
amendments.
Conditions of Approval for PRD amendment (Planning Commission February 22, 2006)
1. All conditions of preliminary approval shall remain in effect.
See above description of how those conditions were met.
2. Fire hydrants shall be located per the Fire Department requirements.
See above.
3.
A bond other security measures acceptable to the City attorney in the amount of
$206,000 ($137,499 X 150%) for completion of infrastructure requirements shall
be in place before final approval is granted. - _____n____
The City Engineer has approved the bond amount.
Erosion and sedimentation controls shall be in place and properly maintained
throughout the Jife of the project. If found to fail work shall cease until the
33
4.
The Peninsula Village PRDlsubdivision
Conditions for fmal approval
March 7, 2006
Page 4
required measures are in place per City specifications regarding best management
practices and process of the PRD reviews shall cease until the situation is
rectified.
Due to recent on going problems with erosion and sedimentation controls, this
condition was added. This is an on going condition that shall stay in place until
construction and installation of utilities is fully completed.
5. Inspection of the site to ensure that erosion and sedimentation control measures
have been placed per the' City's direction shall be done by the City on February
23,2006. Work shall cease until the required measures are in place per City
specifications regarding best management practices and process of the PRD
reviews shall cease until the situation is rectified. Additionally, if the inspection
fails and work is not under way to correct the short coming, an amount of money
shall be set by the City Engineer to rectify the situation that will be added to the
bonding described in Condition 3 such that the City shall perform the work.
This condition was added at the Planning Commission meeting of February 22,
2006, due to continuing problems with erosion and sedimentation controls.
This condition is superseded by condition #4.
.
.
.
34
~
~(IlYlo ~
./1 ~i ~~
.
.
PENINSULA VILLAGE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
AND SUBDIVISION FINAL REVIEW: Amendment to and final review of a
previously approved planned residential development and subdivision in the RS-9
Residential Single Family zone.
Associate Planner Scott Johns reviewed the Department's report recommending
approval of the final planned residential development and subdivision with conditions. He
explained that a condition is needed to address erosion and sedimentation issues that have been
an ongoing problem throughout construction on the site. Several site visits have been made by
City staff in an attempt to identify and correct the short comings of the construction site, but the
site at present still is not in compliance with standard best management practices expected in the
City for development. Staffhas been very explicit that if the management practices are not
immediately corrected, the site will be shut down until brought to minimum standards for erosion
and sedimentation control. Condition No.5 will ensure that if immediate measures are not taken,
the site will be shut down, and an amendment to proposed Condition 4 was made to ensure that
once brought into compliance, the site will remain in compliance throughout the development
process.
Bob Leach, Northwestem Territories, Inc., xxx South Peabody Street, explained that
the property changed ownership after the preliminary planned residential development and
subdivision approval was made and the new owner decided to reduce the number of lots from 38
to 32. The owner believes that the amended development proposal will better fit with other
development in the area and that the larger lot sizes will suit the general area better than
originally presented. All other conditions of approval either have been completed or will be
bonded for to gain fmal approval of the development.
Mr. Leach responded to Commissioner Rasmussen that properties to the south of the site
are accessed from Maddock Road and are located in the County so do not enjoy City services.
-----~---Jim-Ciaciuch; i13-South ValleyStreet,-providedbackground as to how heacquired----""---~---~u
ownership of the site and explained some of the many problems that he has encountered during.
the construction activity. He indicated thatthepreviousowner had begun development prior to u
his purchasing of the site and some of the utility infrastructure needed to be replaced which
created quite a disturbance of soil during the winter rainy season. The site has been difficult to
develop partially because of the management practices of the previous owner/developer and
largely due to the rainy season and poor soil conditions. He is committed to moving forward in a
positive manner and to developing a quality development.
Following discussion regarding wording of proposed Condition Nos. 4 and 5, and added
findings and conclusions to support the conditions, Commissioner Kalish moved to recommend
that the City Council approve the planned residential development and subdivision citing the
conditions as proposed by staff, and supported by the following findings and conclusions:
Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
All conditions of preliminary approval shall remain in effect.
-.--.---.-.-- ---.. .--~~---_.------ ----
---------~-----
Fire hydrants shall be located per the Fire Department requirements.
A bond other security measures acceptable to the City attorney in the amount of $206,000
35
Preliminary approval ofthe PRD and Subdivision was granted onJune 1,2004. A
request for amendment was received on January 27, 2006.
The proposed amendment reduces the number of lots and increases the'size of the lots
from the design of the approved PRD and subdivision.
Port Angeles Municipal Code (P AMC) Chapter 17.19 sets forth the City's requirements
for the approval of planned residential developments, and P AMC Chapter 16.08 sets forth
the City's requirements for the approval of subdivisions.
The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the
uniform division of land within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a
~~~ciIT tojgquiJe i!!to the Qu~lic l1se ~~jntere~!p}"oposed to be served by the establishment
of a subdivision. It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited---
to, the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets
--or roads,-alleys, otlier public ways; transitstops, potablewatersupplies;-sanitary-wastes~--'--
parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all
other relevant facts including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe
walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school and whether the public
interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved
unless the city can make written findings that these provisions are made.
($137,499 X 150%) for completion of infrastructure requirements shall be in place before
final approval is granted.
Erosion and sedimentation controls shall be in place and properly maintained throughout
the life of the project. If found to fail, work shall cease until the required measures are in
place per City specifications regarding best management practices and process of the
PRD reviews shall cease until the situation is rectified.
5. Inspection ofthe site to ensure that erosion and sedimentation control measures have been
placed per the City's direction shall be done by the City on February 23,2006. Work
shall cease after a 24-hour notification until the required measures are in place per City
specifications regarding best management practices and process of the PRD reviews shall
cease until the situation is rectified. Additionally, if the inspection fails and work is not
under way to correct the short coming, an amount of money shall be set by the City
Engineer to rectify the situation that will be added to the bonding described in Condition
3 such that the City shall perform the work.
4.
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
.
.
5. The purpose ofa planned residential development (PRD) is set forth in Section 17.19.010
as follows:
This Overlay Zone is to provide alternative zoning regulations which permit and
encourage design flexibility, conservation and protection of natural amenities and
critical areas, and innovation in residential developments to those regulations
found in the underlying zone. It is intended that a Planned Residential
______~evelopmenLwiIL.,.esult in.a residentiaLenvironmentojhighet.quality than.______ _____..~_.._
traditionallot-by-Iot development by use of a design process which includes within .
the site design all the components of a residential neighborhood, such as open
36
" ",
.
space, circulation, building types, and natural features, in a manner consistent with
the public health, safety, and welfare.
The proposed IS-acre Peninsula Village Planned Residential Development (PRD) and
Subdivision site is located on the south side of Lindberg Road and east of Golf Course
Road.
7. The proposed amendment has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan,
Zoning Code, and Subdivision Ordinance. The Comprehensive Plan land use
designations for the site is High Density Residential (HDR). The approximately 9.3 acre
property in the first phase of the PRD was rezoned to RHD Residential High Density
several years ago and is situated across Lindberg Road from Peninsula Golf Course,
which is zoned PBP Public Buildings and Parks due to its open space characteristics.
Other surrounding properties, including the second phase ofthe PRD, are zoned RS-9
Residential Single Family and either are developed with low-density residential uses or
are undeveloped.
8. The City's Fire, Public Works, Parks and Recreation, and Community Development
Departments reviewed the proposed amendment to the planned residential development
and subdivision preliminary plat.
9. The proposal meets the minimum site size for a planned residential development, and
only single family homes, which are permitted uses in the RHD Zone, are proposed.
10. The City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments currently serve the site.
11. Building permits are required for all structures on any approved building lots. All local
Building and Fire Codes apply to any new construction on the subject property.
12. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance (DNS #1065) on May 7,2004, satisfying the City's SEPA responsibility.
13. The applicant has submitted an engineers estimate for completion of improvements
-- - -------required bySection-16.08.070PAMCinthe amountof$137,499. -----~-----~--~~-___.__
14. Section 16.08.050(B)(2) allows the developer to install or assure installation of the
u_ -- improvements required by Section 16.08.070 PAMC by_furnishing to the City an - -
assignment of a savings account or another approved security or placing in trust, an
amount equal to 150% of the cost of the improvements as determined by the City
Engineer, which assignment of savings account, other security, or trust shall assure to the
City the installation of the improvements, to the satisfaction and approval of the City
Engineer.
15. Inspection of the site on February 17, 21, and 22, 2006, revealed that erosion and
sedimentation practices on the site do not meet the City's minimum engineering
standards. The applicant has been notified several times of this shortcoming.
6.
.
Conclusions:
A.
.I~~_.c~l1~~~ol1s o~_t~e_~~n~n~~laYil1age PRD and Subdivision. are consistent with the
Zoning Code, required by the SubdivisionOrdiriance, aiid-necessaiito implemenftlie
Comprehensive Plan.
.
37
B. As conditioned, all the necessary public improvements will be installed per the City
Urban Services Standards and Guidelines.
As conditioned, the configuration of the proposed subdivision lots and street layouts
conform to the desired urban design of the City for the residential developments in
outlying areas where there is no grid street pattern and low impact development standards
are allowed. The curvilinear private streets and cul-de-sac with a 25 foot paved surface
and no parking along the streets reduce stormwater runoff and still provide adequate
access for each residential lot.
As conditioned, the utility services will be provided consistent with the Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines and the Capital Facilities Element ofthe Comprehensive Plan
level of service standards. Analysis of downstream sanitary sewer capacity has been
provided that indicates no capacity improvements are needed for the additional 38 units
of Peninsula Village PRD.
The small lots proposed for the Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision are desired for
several reasons: 1) the geographical and BPA easement constraints on the site, 2)
recovering City costs for UUD 215, 3) the mixed types of housing already located in the
zone and vicinity, 4) the provision of affordable homes for new families and other first
time home buyers, and 5) the lots satisfy the desired urban design of the City, except for
their small size, which fits the density requirements of the RHD Zone and the PRD
Overlay Zone.
This is not the basic urban land use pattern for the City's higher density multi-family
residential neighborhoods. The density is much more like a single-family residential
neighborhood, and the street and block system is more like outlying areas, which are
largely undeveloped. However, it is not atypical for this zone and vicinity where another
small lot, single-family subdivision in the RHD Zone exists nearby. While it does not
meet the high-density purposes ofthe RHD Zone, it does provide for a higher density
single-family development with surrounding open spaces consistent with the PRD
--- Overlay Zone.-
G. The Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision provide an alternative residential
~development designto--tli.e oasic-smg1effuTIily- residentianfeighborhood and the - basic~----
multi-family residential neighborhood in a manner that is affordable as starter homes for
new families and other first time home buyers. Conditions are recommended that would
satisfy the PRD standards that are not included in the proposal plans.
H. As conditioned, the Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision amended preliminary plat is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
I. As conditioned, the Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision preliminary plat is in
conformance with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 P AMC, and
the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW.
c.
D.
E.
F.
.
.
1. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and
general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
-------- ---------playgrounds, scnoolsaifd -schoolgtofitidS; sidewalks-and other-planning features-that--~--
assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from schooL .
38
.
.
.
As conditioned, the public interest is served in the preliminary approval of planned
residential development and platting of the subdivision as articulated in the City's
Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and Subdivision, Ordinance. The subdivision
provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with
the Growth Management Act and beneficial to the City's tax base. The Peninsula Village
PRD and Subdivision will recover funds expended by the City in support ofULID 215.
The final drainage plan must be approved by the City Engineer, and the City's stormwater
drainage standards will require that the proposed development not impact downstream
properties anymore than pre-development conditions as requested by Peninsula Golf
Course. The drainage and erosion control plans also are subject to the Department of
Ecology NPDES permit.
M. The project engineer is working with the Bonneville Power Administration, and BP A's
comments reflect the expectation that the residential uses will be compatible.
K.
L.
N. The P AMC Chapter 17.19 Planned Residential Development Overlay Zone and Chapter
16.08 Subdivision Regulations allow for variations from standards variations in street
improvements, blocks, lots,. and building line setbacks. Conditions are recommended
where certain proposed variation should not be approved due to the small lot design,
which allows for less on-site variation.
The private street system, as allowed for a PRD, is proposed for Peninsula Village to
minimize rights-of-way, stormwater drains, and/or pedestrian facilities that would be
required for public streets. The 25-foot wide paved private streets must be posted for no
parking, since there is not adequate pavement to allow for anything more than service and
emergency vehicle access as well as individual lot access.
O.
P. hnmediate construction measures are necessary to correct poor erosion and sedimentation
control on the site. The project is conditioned to direct immediate corrective action prior
to authorization or approvals necessary for final of the PRD.
-- The motion-was.seconded by. Commissioner Kiddand passed5-0.----------- .._____~-'-_________~~m______
39
.
.
.
40
THE IYEST 4.5 ACRES OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTER OF THE SOUTHII'EST
OIlARTrR OF THE NORTHII'EST OUARTrR, AND THE NORTH HALF OF THE
NORTHWEST OUARTrR OF SAID SOUTHlI'eST OlJARTrR OF THE NORTHWeST
OIJARTrR OF SeCTION 13, TOWNSHIP 3D NORTH, R4NGe 5 WeST, II:M.,
CL4I.LAM COUNTY; II'ASH/NGTON;
~ THeREFROM THE NORTH 20 nu AND THe WEST 3D FEU;
ALSO FYCFPT THAT PORTION CONl'FYE:O TO THe CITY OF PORT A"GeLFS
BY DefJJ ReCORDED NO~E:AlBER 17, 1997 UNDeR AUDITOR'!; FILE NO.
1997 1000500.
S/7lIATr IN THe COUNTY OF CLALL4M, STATE: OF WASHINGTON.
~
\'.!
'"
~
~
Q
['j
o
L>
"
e
~
'i'
'"
~
o 60
w. I
SCALE III n:rr
I\)
U)
LEG.JJ... DESCRIPTION
NOTES
~
~
:;J
'"
~
w
2
"'
~
ftr:::-
~'" :/-. <.
~~/
Df"9II "A.c::E
IIli!=n
I
~
~
I 8
&'-
~~ ~
"\1 ~
I~ a
,H ~
;H ~
d~ iJ n
~-~
~h . ~ ~ !I
'-
-;;~ -
~f ~ :j a E
120
I
t-
o
I
o JO
I
,
J
~ I' ~'!J
~ ~
~ I ~ ~
~I ~
01 ~
Or-~
, . l-..
I~
I
I
I
I JO
I
I
I
I
,
I
o
I-
I
I
Peninsula ViII,age
a Planned Residential Deyelopment
o portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest
of Section 13, Township 30 North, Range 6 West,
C/a//am County, Washington
(~ Cl)c
w~
co W.2
~ 8 C)cu
zil;
C'I <(0
= ....~
Quorter I!JY ...... O::c
I o=>
W.M., <S?) a:: Q.E
<[ LLg
Ib!!:!J 2: 00
>-'0
t-...:
~- -0.
(,)<1>
0
~
~
~
Lhldb~J'g H.oa(l
"
.,
:?
91.f.68
:J
,"",
r-.-------.,
I: I
I ; ,.~",==,,! ~
::~l!
L__-Ul~__l 2!
I :-------"1
l i .3 : ,..
- I I ~.nt:zl" I II::
'I <E> !
J L._L~_
,-------...
I I ,
I I
J I 2 :
1 f 5n.:.":
J:~:
I 1.--__L9I__~
I ,----_-,
r:-5 I
1/ I I
. j ull::n:
,/1 (@ I
I L----t~..__J
~
~
N~ _
J
" I!;
J~;;
I~~
~
.~
'"
r
cl
'"
--
--
--
---
LEGEND
[ZZ8
INGReSS, EGRESS AND ul/un' ",'SEMWT II'/I/i A ''''111I/G
WIDTH FROM 50 nIT 10 3D nu 10 BWEnT All LOTS
II'mflN nitS SUBD/11510N AND 7liE' PIIOPt:RllfS L OC.\7FD
TO TIle SOUIII OF lHE' S/.IBDMSION
~
~Z~
~~~
15-FOOT SANITARY SEWER AND S70RAI /..'.'<<IN EASEMeNT
1D-FOOT SANITAm' SEllER EASE:UfIlT
10-FOOT STORM DRAIN EAS[A(ENT
1. AU LOTS ",THIN THIS SUBDIVISION' ARe SUBJeCT TO AND BeNeFIT FROM
THE CONOIT/ONS, CONl'eNANTS, AND RE!iTRICnONS IN!iTRUMENT RECORDED
UNDER CLAllAAl CDUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2005-
2. AU LOTS ARe SUBJeCT TO AND BeNE:FTr FROM THe CONTINUOUS AND
PeRPF7lIAL MAINTrN~NCE OF CDMAlON AREAS, ROADS, AND UTILITY
EASEMENT5 AS OeSCRIBfJJ IN THE AL4JNTE:NAIICE AGREEME:NT RECORDeD
UNDER CLAlLAM COUNT}' AUDITOR'S ALE NUMBER ?DOS-
1/'/'//1 5-FOOT LlTlLIT}' eASEMeNT
LL' ...(LA
~ ADDReSS NUMBE:R
296.28
BUlLOING SE7BACK UNE
AFN CLAllAAl CDUNTY AUDITOR'S FilE NUMBER
AREAS
NOTE REQUIRED 8'( THE CfT'( OF POffT ANGElES
TOTAL S/TE: AREA ~ 372.J59 SO FT (8,55 ACReS)
TOTAL OPEN SPACe AREA - III.7J~ SD FT (2.57 ACRFS)
TOTAL ReCRCATlONAL ARE4 - I II.7J~ SO FT (2.57 ACRES)
ALL RESIDeNCES II'ITHIN THIS SUBOIl1SION SHALL Be FITTrO WITH ReSIDeNTIAL
SPRINKLER SYSTE:MS PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY.
liflI
.....
c:;
IOu
E:-.J
Q--.J
o
Q) "q) ,
t:n::"~
Oltl....
_QO
~--~
- tl ~
'-
tJC:~
-ltlltl
:J :t> S:
0) iii
c::ltl(J
--- 0:: '-
c:: Q
Q) \:) E:
0_ ~ ~ .
c:;O
tl
Q:~
~
tl
Ji..
c
~
"-
l?
~
u-:- . 0-
~ ~~
c:: 1': !
f: ~~ i
~ ; ~ e
LL; t ~
t-3ci
"'..E
z ,,=\;;;;
f3 ~j ~
~ I E
~ H ~
~ ~:3
no
C
7'
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
March 7, 2006
CITY COUNCIL
NATHAN A. WEST IV W
PRINeIP AL PLANNER
Municipal Code Amendment MCA 06-01
Summary: Amendment to Section 15.12 Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance and Section
17.96 Special Provisions of the Port Angeles Municipal Code with regard to appeals.
Recommendation: Council should concur with the Planning Commission's
recommendation and approve the ordinances to amend the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
.
Background / Analvsis:
On February 21,2006, Council conducted the first reading of the draft ordinances in
relation to Section 15.12 Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance and Section 17.96.070 (C) (3)
Hearing and Appeal of Conditional or Unclassified Use Permit Applications. As noted during the
first during the firstreading; the-Planning Commission recommended -thatthe City Council adopt ~----~--~,
the identified changes.
_ The changes to the Elood DamagePrevention Ordinance area result gf a letteLd(l.!~d . .~. ___
October 13,2005 from the Department of Ecology indicating that specific changes to the Port
Angeles Municipal Code were required for compliance with the National Flood Insurance
Program. Attachment A identifies the changes as recommended by the Department of Ecology.
The Section 17.96.070 change has been identified as a mistake in the Municipal Code
Ordinance which requires notification for an appeal process. This is a flaw in the code in that
notification is not required for a closed record appeal. Attachment B identifies the recommended
change.
The proposed amendments are part of the Community and Economic Development
Departments efforts to update and clean up relevant sections of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
Attachments:
.
A.
B.
C.
Draft Ordinance Section 15.12
Draft Ordinance Section 17.96
Planning Commission staff report and minutes
41
.
.
.
42
.
ATTACHMENT A
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, amending a
portion of Title 15, as it relates to Flood Damage Prevention, of the
Port Angeles Municipal Code.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES do hereby ordain as
follows:
Whereas, the City's flood damage prevention regulations need to be amended and
updated to be consistent with FEMA regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON,
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
.
Section 1.
Ordinance 2091, as amended, and a portion of Title 15 are hereby
amended by amending 15.12 PAMC to read as follows:
Sections:
15.12.010
15.12.020
15.12.030
15.12.040
15.12.050
15.12.060
15.12.070
FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION
- ARTICLEI: GENERAL PROVISIONS -
Title.
Purpose.
General Provisions.
Compliance Required.
Interpretation and Application.
More Stringent Regulations to Apply in Case of Conflict.
Disclaimer of Liability.
ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS
.
15.12.075 Appeal.
- ---15:1T. 07 6-----Afea-orShallow Flooding:-------
15.12.080 Area of Special Flood Hazard.
15.12.081 Baseflood.
43 -1-
Development Permit Required - Application Requirements.
Sta.ndards Generally.
Provisions for Flood Hazard Protection Reduction - General
Standards'.
15..12.270 Specific Standards.
__ ___15.12.33D___Eloodways .__________~__________
15.12.335 Wetlands Management.
15.12.082
15.12.090
15.12.100
15.12.102
15. 12.1 04
15.12.110
15.12.112
15.12.114
15.12.116
15.12.118
15.12.120
15.12.130
15.12.140
15.12.150
15.12.155
15.12.160
15.12.163
15.12.166
15.12.180
15.12.185
15.12.187
15.12.190
15.12.200
15.12.205
15.12.210
15.12.215
-----------15 ;-12.-:-216
15.12.220
15.12.230
15.12.235
I
15.12.240
15.12.250
15.12.260
Basement.
Breakaway Wall.
Coastal High Hazard Area.
Critical Facilitv.
Cumulative Substantial Damage.
Development.
Elevation Certificate.
Elevated Building.
Existing Manufactured Home or Park Subdivision.
Expansion to An Existing Manufactured Home Park or Subdivision.
Flood or Flooding.
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).
Flood Insurance Study (FIS).
Floodway.
Increased Cost of Compliance.
Lowest Floor.
ManUfactured Home.
Manufacfured Home Park or Subdivision.
New Construction.
New'Manufactured Home Park or Subdivision.
Recreational Vehicle.
Start of Construction.
Structure .'
Substantial Damage.
Substantial Improvement.
Vatiance.
-Water-Dependent.
.
.
.
ARTICLEJII,.-A_I2.MU"USIM TIQN__~__
Duties of ' Director of Public Works and Utilities.
Dutles- of Director of Community and Economic Development.
Var'iance 'Procedure.
ARTICLE IV. REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS
-2-
~ \ /
44
.....
.
.
.
.
15.12.340
15.12.345
Coastal High Hazard Area.
Standards for Shallow Flooding Areas (AO Zones)
ARTICLE V. VIOLA TION
15.12.350
Violation is Misdemeanor.
ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
15.12.010 Title. This Chapter may be cited as the Flood Damage Prevention Chapter
of the City of Port Angeles.
15.12.020 Purpose. It is the purpose of this Chapter to promote the public health,
safety and general welfare, and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions
in specific areas of the City, by provisions designed:
A. To protect human life and health;
B. To minimize expenditure of public money and costly flood control projects;
C. To minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding, and
generally undertaken at the expense of the general public;
D. To minimize prolonged business interruptions;
E. To minimize damage to public facilities and utilities such as water and gas
mains, electric, telephone, and sewer lines, and streets and bridges located in areas of special
flood hazard;
F.- To help maintain a stable tax base by providing for the sound use' and
development of areas of special flood hazard so as to minimize future flood blight areas;
------------nG.---~To-ensure that thosenwho-occupy- areas of- special-flood - hazard assume ---------
responsibility for their actions;
H.--To assure the availability of flood insurance within the City ofPor:tAngeles.
15.12.030 General Provisions.
A. Lands to which this Chapter applies: This Chapter shall apply to all areas of
special flood hazards within the jurisdiction of the City of Port Angeles.
B. Basis for establishing the areas of special flood hazard: The areas of special
flood hazard identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in a scientific and engineering
report entitled Flood Insurance Study for the City of Port Angeles, dated February, 1980, and
revised September 28, 1990, with accompanying Flood Insurance Maps is hereby adopted by
reference and declared to be a part of this Chapter. The Flood Insurance Study and Flood
Insurance Rate Map ( s) areis on file at the office of the City Clerk, 321 East Fifth Street, Port
Angeles,- Washington 98362.
-3-
45
15.12.040 Compliance Required No structure or land shall hereafter be constructed,
located, extended, converted or altered without compliance with the terms of this Chapter as
well as all other applicable regulations.
.
15.12.050 Interpretation and Application In the interpretation and application ofthis
Chapter, all provisions shall be:
A. Considered as minimum requirements;
B. Liberally construed in favor of the governing body; and
C. Deemed neither to limit nor repeal any other powers granted under State
statutes.
15.12.060 More Stringent Regulations to Apply in Case of Conflict . Should the
provisions of this Chapter and any other ordinance, easement, covenant or deed conflict or
overlap, whichever regulation imposes the more stringent regulations shall prevail.
15.12.070 Disclaimer of Liability. The degree of flood protection required by this
Chapter is considered r~asonable for regulatory purposes; it is based on scientific and
engineering considerations. Larger floods can, and will, occur on rate occasions. Flood
heights may be increased by manmade or natural causes. This Chapter does not imply that
land outside the areas of special flood hazard or uses permitted within such areas will be free
from flood damages. This Chapter shall not create liability on the part of the City, any
employee or officer thereof, or the Federal Insurance Administration, during any flood .
damages that may result from a reliance on this Chapter, or any administrative decision made
hereunder.
ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS
15.12.075 Appeal. "Appeal" means a request.for a review of the Director ofl'ublie
_________ Vol orks'. interpretationoLany proYision. of.this. ordinanccChaptc.Lor_ a]equestJpI_a _variance._
15.12.076 Area of Shallow Flooding "Area of Shallow Flooding" means a designated
AO or AH Zone on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). AO zones have base flood depths
that range from one to three feet above the natural ground: a clearly defined channel does not
exist: the path of flooding is unpredictable and indeterminate: and, velocity flow may be evident.
AO is characterized as sheet flow: AH indicates ponding, and is shown with standard base flood
elevations. The base flood depths range fiom one to tmee feet, a deal})! defined channel docs not
exist, the path of flooding is unpredictable and indeterminate, and velocity flow may be evident.
AO is eharactGriz,ed as shect flow and AIl indicates ponding.
15.12.080 Area of Special Flood Hazard. "Area of special flood hazard" means the
land in the flood,JJlain within a community subject to a one percent or greater chance of
_.__~floodingjnany-giyenyear. Designation on maps always includes the letters A or V.
.
46
-4-
r-~
I
.
15.12.081 Baseflood. "Baseflood" means the flood having a 1 % chance of being equaled
or exceeded in anv given vear (also referred to as the "1 OO-vear flood"), Designated on Flood
Insurance Rate Maps bv the letters A or V.
15.12.082 Basement. "Basement" means anv area ofthe building having its floor sub-
grade (below ground level) on all sides.
15.12.090 Breakaway Wall. "Breakaway wall" means a wall that is not a part of the
structural support of the building and is intended through its design and construction to
collapse under specific lateral loading forces, without causing damage to the elevated portion
of the building or supporting foundation system.
15.12.100 Coastal High Hazard Area. "Coastal high hazard area" means an area of
special flood hazard extending from offshore to the inland limit of a primarv frontal dune
along an open coast and anv other area subiect to high velocity wave action from storms or
seismic sources. The area is designated on the FIRM as Zone VI-30, VE or V." the area
subject to high velocity witters, including but not lhnitcd to, stOlID surges or tsunamis. The
area is designated on a FIRM as Zone VI-3D.
.
15.12.102 Critical Facility. "Critical facility" means a facility for which even a slight
chance offlooding might be too great. Critical facilities include (but are not limited to) schools,
nursing homes. hospitals. police, fire and emergencv response installations. and installations
which produce. use, or store hazardous " materials or hazardous waste.
15.12.104 Cumulative Substantial Damage. "Cumulative substantial damage" means
flood-related damages sustained by a structure on two separate occasions during a 10-yearperiod
_h~_~~__~__' -~~'forwhich~the cost of repairs-at-the time of each such flood event. on the average, equals or.
exceeds 25 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred.
---- --~- ..---
15.12.110 Development. "Development" means any manmade change to improved
or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining,
dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations or storage of equipment
or materials located within the area of special flood hazard.
15.12.112 Elevation Certificate: "Elevation certificate" means the official form (FEMA
Form 81-3 1) used to track development provide elevation information necessary to ensure
compliance with community floodplain management ordinances, and determine the proper
insurance premium rate with Section B completed by Community Officials.
15.12.114 Elevated Building. "Elevated building" means for insurance purposes, a non-
basement building that has its lowest elevated floor raised above ground level bv foundation
walls,' shear walls. post. piers, pilings. or columns.
.
-5-
47
15.12.116 Existing Manufactured Home Parkor Subdivision. "Existing manufactured .
home park or subdivision" means a manufactured home park or subdivision for which the
construction offacilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are to be affixed
(including, at a minimum, the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final
site grading or the pouring of concrete pads) is completed before the effective date of the adopted
floodplain management regulations.
15.12.118 Expansion to An Existing Manufactured Home Park or Subdivision.
"Expansion to an existing manufactured home park or subdivision" means the preparation of
additional sites by the construction offacilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured
homes are to be affixed (including the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and
either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads).
15.12.120 Flood or Flooding "Flood" or "flooding" means a general and temporary
condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from:
A. The overflow of inland or tidal waters; and/or
B. The unusual and rapid accumulation of runoff of surface waters from any
source.
15.12.130 Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). "Flood insurance rate map" (FIRM)
means the official map on which the Federal Insurance Administration has delineated both the
areas of special flood hazard and the risk premium zones applicable to the community.
15.12.140 Flood Insurance Study (FIS). "Flood insurance study" (FIS) means the
official report provided by the Federal Insurance Administration that includes flood profiles,
the Eflood ~boundary-.Efloodway Mmap, and the water surface elevation of the base flood.
.
15.12.150 Floodway. "Floodway" means the channel of a river or other watercourse
u_ and the adjacentJan9-~e::t~Jhat p;1ust b~_reserved il!_~~der to_ ~i~cha!ge _th~ba~e flood without
cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than one foot. --
15.12.155 Increased Cost ofCoJ:r1Pliance. "Increased cost of compliance" means a flood
insurance claim payment UP to $30,000 direct1v to a property owner for the cost to comply with
floodplain management regulations after a direct phvsicalloss causedbv a flood. Eligibility for
an ICC claim can be through a single instance of "substantial damage" or as a result of a
"cumulative substantial damage." (More information can be found in FEMA ICe Manual 30 1.)
15.12.160 Lowest Floor. "Lowest floor" means the lowest floor of the lowest
enclosed area (including basement). An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure, usable solely
for parking of vehicles, building access or storage, in an area other than a basement area, is
not considered a building I s lowest floor, provided that such enclosure is not built so as to
______renci~Lthe stn;cture in vi()lation 2f the applicablell.9_n-elevation design requirements of this
Chapter found at 15. 12.270(A)1. -------- ------
.
-6-
48
.
.
.
15.12.163 Manufactured Home "Manufactured home" means a structure,
transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed
for use with or without a permanent foundation when attachedcomlcctcd to the required
utilities. Por flood plain managcmcnt purposes, the term "manufactured homc" also includes
park trailers, travel trailers, and other similar vehicles placed 011 a site fO! greater than 180
consccuti'vc days. [<or insmance purposes, the term "manufactured home" docs not include
park trailers, travcl trailers, and other similar vehicles. The term "manufactured home" does
not include a recreational vehicle.
15.12.166 Manufactured Home Park or Subdivision. "Manufactured home park or
subdivision" means a parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more
manufactured home lots for rent or sale
15.12.180 New Construction. "New construction" means structures for which the
"start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of this. Chapter.
15.12.185 New Manufactured Home Park or Subdivision. "New manufactured home
park or subdivision" means a manufactured home park or subdivision for which the construction
of facilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are to be affixed (including
at a minimum. the installation of utilities. the construction of streets. and either final site grading
or the pouring of concrete pads) is completed on or after the effective date of adopted floodplain
management regulations.
15.12.187 Recreational Vehicle. "Recreational vehicle" means a vehicle.
1) built on a single chassis;
2) 400 square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal proiection; _______
3) Designed to be self-propelled orpermanentlvtowable bv a light dutvtruckand
4) Desi gned primarilv not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living
Uquartersfor recreation at. camping. traveL or seasonal use.
15.12.190 Start of Construction "Start of construction" includes substantial
improvement, and means the date the building permit was issued, provided the actual start of
construction, repair, reconstruction, placement or other improvement was within 180 days of
the permit date. The actual start means either the first placement of permanent construction
of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the
construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation; or the placement of a
manufactured home on a foundation. Permanent construction does not include land
preparation, such as clearing, grading and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets
and/or walkways; nor does it include excavation for a basement, footings, piers, or foundation
or the erection of temporary forms; nor does it include the installation on the property of
accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the
-umaiIl-strTIcture:Fof a substantial improvement the actualstartof.construction means-the first
-7-
49
alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of a building, whether or not that .
alteration affects the external dimensions of the building.
15.12.200 Structure. "Structure" means a walled and roofed building including a gas
or liquid storage tank that is principally aboye ground.
15.12.205 Substantial Damage. "Substantial Damage" means damage of any origin
sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before damaged
condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the
damage occurred.
15.12.210 Substantial Improvement. "Substantial improvement" means any repairs,
reconstruction, or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds fifty percent
of the market value of the structure either:
1. Before the improvement or repair is started; or
2. If the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before the damage
occurred. For the purposes of this defmition IIsubstantial improvementll is considered to occur
when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of the building
commenced, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure.
The term does not; however, include either:
1. Any project for improvement of a structure to correct pre-citedcomply
with existing violations of State or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which are .
the minimumscldy necessary to assure safe living conditions; or .
2. Any alteration of a structure listed on the National Register of Historic
Places or a State Inventory of Historic Places.
15.12.215 Variance. "Variance"-meansagranLofrelieLfroffi_theIequirements ofthis____
Chapter which permits construction in a manner that would otherwise be prohibited by this
Ql1apte~____ ..___
15.12.216 Water Dependent. IIWater Dependene' means a structure for commerce or
industry which cannot exist in any other location and is dependent on the water by reason of the
intrinsic nature of its operation.
ARTICLE III. ADMINISTRATION
15.12.220 Duties of Director of Public Works . The Director of Public Works and
Utilities shall be primarily responsible for the administration and implementation ofthis Chapter.
The Director of Public Works and Utilities shall perform the following duties:
A. Review all development permits other than for subdivisions, short subdivisions
and plamled residential developments within flood hazard zones to determine:
1. That the permit requirements of this Chapter have been satisfied;
.
-8-
50
.
.
.
2. That all necessary permits have been obtained from those Federal, State
or local governmental agencies from which prior approval is required;
3. If the proposed development is located in the floodway, and if so, located
to assure that the encroachment provisions of this Chapter are complied with.
B. When base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with Section
15.12.030 - General Provisions, the Director of Public Works and Utilities shall obtain, review
and reasonably utilize any base flood elevation and floodway data available from a Federal, State
or other source, in order to administer specific standards and floodways.
C. Obtain and record the following information:
1. Where base flood elevation data is provided through the Flood Insurance
Study. Flood Insurance Rate Map. or required as in P AMC 15 .12.220(B), obtain and record the
actual elevation, in relation to mean sea level, ofthe lowest habitable floor (including basement)
of all new or substantially improved structures, and whether or not the structure contains a
basement;
2. For all new or substantially improved floodproofed non-residential
structures:
a. Verify and record the actual elevation in relation to mean sea level
to which the structure was flood proofed; and
b. Maintain the floodproofing certifications required by this Chapter.
D. Maintain for public inspection all records pertaining to the provisions of this
Chapter.
E. Notify adjacent communities and the office of the State Department of Ecology
prior to any alteration or relocation of any watercourse, and submit evidence of such notification
to the Federal Insurance Administration.
F. Require that maintenance is provided within the altered or relocated portion of
said water course so that the flood carrying capacity is not diminished.
~___ __G. ____Makejnterpretations where ne_ededas_to eX'lct location_of th~_bollndflries_of the
areas of special flood hazards (for example, where there appears to be a conflict between a
mapped boundary and actual field conditions). The person contesting the location of the
boundary shall be given reasonable opportunitY to appeal the interpretation as provided-in
Section 15.12.240.
15.12.230 Duties of Director of Community and Economic DevelopmentTheDirector
of Community and Economic Development shall perform the following duties:
A. Review all permits for subdivisions, short subdivisions or planned residential
developments within flood hazard zones to determine:
1. That the permit requirements of this Chapter have been satisfied;
2. That all necessary permits have been obtained from those Federal, State
or local governmental agencies from which prior approval is required.
B. Transmit to the Department of Public Works and Utilities all infoffilation required
under the terms of this Chapter.
-9-
51
--:=:-,-,,:1
15.12.235 Variance Procedure.
A. Appeal Board:
1. The Board of Adjustment as established by the City of Port Angeles shall
\
hear and decide appeals and requests for variances from the requirements ofthis Chapter.
2. The Board of Adjustment shall hear and decide appeals when it is alleged
there is an error in any requirement, decision, or determination made by the Director of Public
Works and Utilities in the enforcement or administration of this Chapter.
3. Those aggrieved by the decision of the Board of Adjustment, or any
taxpayer, may appeal such decision to the Superior Court of Clallam County, as provided in
Chapter 2.52 P AMC.
4. In passing upon such applications, the Board of Adjustment shall consider
all technical evaluations, all relevant factors, standards specified in other sections ofthis Chapter,
and:
a. the danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the
injury ofothers;
b. the danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage;
c. the susceptibility ofthe proposed facility and its contents to flood
damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner;
d. the importance of the services provided by the proposed facility
to the community;
e. the necessity to the facility of a water front location, where
applicable;
f. the availability of alternative locations for the proposed use which
are not subject to flooding or erosion damage;
g. the compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated
development;
.
.
___ _____________ h.__the_I.~Ia.tiQnship_ofJl1emQRo~eclJls~ to the_CQmprehensiyeJ~lan~_________
and Flood Plain Management Program for that area;
f h the safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary
------ ---u------andemergency veliicles-;------------ --- -
j. the expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment
transport of the flood waters and the effects of wave action, if applicable, expected at the site;
and
k. the costs of providing governmental services during and after flood
conditions, including maintenance and repair of public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas,
electrical, and water systems, and streets and bridges.
5. Upon consideration of the factors of Sub-Section A(4) and the purposes.
of this ~hapter, the Board of Adjustment may attach such conditions to the granting of variances
as it deems necessary to further the purposes of this Chapter.
6. The Director of Public Works and Utilities shall maintain the records of
all appeal actions and report any variances to the Federal Insurance Administration upon request.
B. Conditions for Variances:
l-:--Generally;theonlycondition under which a variance fromthe-elevation----
standard may be issued is for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on .
-10-
52.
.
a lot of one-half acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures
constructed below the base flood level, providing items (a - k) in Sub-Section A( 4) have been
fully considered. As the lot size increases, the technical justification required for issuing the
vanance mcreases.
2. Variances may be issued for the reconstruction, rehabilitation, or
restoration of structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the State Inventory
of Historic Places, without regard to the procedures set forth in this Section.
3. Variances shall not be issued within a designated floodway if any increase
in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result.
4. Variances shall only be issued upon a determination that the variance is
the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief.
5. Variances shall only be issued upon:
a. a showing of good and sufficient cause;
b. a determination that failure to grant the variance would result in
exceptional hardship to the applicant;
c. a determination that the granting of a variance wilInot result in
increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, create
nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of the public as identified in Sub-Section A( 4), or
conflict with existing local laws or ordinances.
6. Variances as interpreted in the National Flood Insurance Program are
based on the general zoning law principle that they pertain to a physical piece of property; they
are not personal in nature and do 110t pertain to the structure, its inhabitants, economic or
financial circumstances. They primarily address small lots in densely populated residential
neighborhoods. As such, variances from the flood elevations should be quite rare.
7. Variances may be issued for non-residential buildings in very limited
circumstances to allow a lesser degree of floodproofing than watertight or dry- floodproofmg,
_____________whereit can be determined that such action win hayeJowdamage potential, compliescwithalL__
other variance criteria except Sub-Section B(1), and otherwise complies with the general
standards.
- 8. -Ally applicanftowhomavarianceis granted shall be given written nofic-e
that the structure will be permitted to be built with a lowest floor elevation below the base flood
elevation and that the cost of flood insurance will be commensurate with the increased risk
resulting from the reduced lowest floor elevation.
.
ARTICLE IV. REQUlREMENTS AND STANDARDS
15.12.240 Development Permit Required - Application Requirements.
A. A development permit shall be required before construction or development
within an area of special flood hazard established in P AMC l5.12.030B. If a pennit for any
development is required under another City ordinance, the development permit shall be
combined with that permit. The permit shall be for all structures including manufactured homes,
as set forth in the "Definitions'" and for all development, including fill and other activities, also
n as-setforthin the"Definitions";------~
.
-11-
53
B. The application for development permit shall be made on forms furnished by the .
Department of Public Works and Utilities. The application may include but shall not be limited
to: plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevation of
the area in question; existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, drainage facilities,
and the location of the foregoing. Specifically, the following information shall be required:
1. Elevation in relation to mean sea level, of the lowest floor, including
basement, of all structures;
2. Elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any structure has been
flood-proofed;
3. Certification by a registered professional engineer or architect that the
flood-proofing methods for any nonresidential structure meet the flood-proofmg criteria of this
Chapter;
4. A description of the extent to which any water course will be altered or
relocated as a result of the proposed development.
15.12.250 Standards Generally. In all areas of special flood hazards, the standards set
forth in Sections 15.12.260 through 15.12.320 are required.
15.12.260 Provisions for Flood Hazard Protection Reduction - General Standards. In
all areas of special flood hazards, the following standards are required:
A. Anchoring.
1. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be anchored to
prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movements of the structure. .
2. All manufactured homes must likewise be anchored to prevent flotation,
collapse or lateral movement and shall be installed using methods and practices that minimize
flood damage. Anchoring methods may include, but are not limited to, use of over-the-top or
m____fr(iII1e_:ti~s to ground anc;p~~_(Reference FEW's "lv!anufactured Home InstallationinJlood _
Hazard Areas" guidebook for additional techniques).
B. Construction Materials and Methods.
----r----AllnevF construction - and -substantial- improvements shall-be- constructed---
with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage.
2. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed
using methods and practices that minimize flood damage.
3. Electrical heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment
and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent
water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding.
C. Utilities.
1. All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to
minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system. Additionallv, all water wells
shall be located on high ground and not in the floodwav.
2. New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to
minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharge from the
------ - ---systems into flood-waters;- .--- -- - u____
.
-12-
54
.
3. On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to
them or contamination from them during flooding.
D. Subdivision Proposals.
1. All subdivision proposals shall be consistent with the need to minimize
flood damage.
2. All subdivision proposals shall have public utilities and facilities such as
sewer, gas, electrical, and water systems located and constructed to minimize flood damage.
3. All subdivision proposals shall have adequate drainage provided to reduce
exposure to flood damage.
4. Where base flood elevation data has not been provided or is not available
from another authoritative source, it shall be generated for subdivision proposals and other
proposed developments which contain at least 50 lots or 5 acres (whichever is less).
E. Review of Building Permits. Where elevation data is not available either through
the Flood Insurance Study or from another authoritative source (See PAMe 15.12.220(B)),
applications for building permits shall be reviewed to assure that proposed construction will be
reasonably safe from flooding. The test of reasonableness is a local judgment and includes use
of historical data, high water marks, photographs of past flooding, etc., where available. Failure
to elevate at least two feet above grade in these zones may result in higher insurance rates.
.
15.12.270 Specific Standards. In all areas of special flood hazards where base flood
elevation data has been provided as set forth in Section 15.12.030 General Provisions, or P AMC
15.l2.220(B), the following provisions are required:
A: Residential Construction.
1. New construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure
shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to the base flood elevation.
2. Fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are subject to flooding
are prohibited, or shall be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior
walls-by allowing for the-entryuanc'Cexlioffioodwateri15eslgnsfor meetingUilllsreqllITement
must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or must meet or exceed
-- the following minimumcriteria:- -- - -- -----
a. A minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less than
one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided.
b. The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above
grade.
.
c. Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, or other
coverings or devices, provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwaters.
B. Non-Residential Construction. New construction and substantial improvement
of any commercial, industrial or other non-residential structure shall either have the lowest floor,
including basement, elevated to the level ofthe base flood elevation; or, together with attendant
utility and sanitary facilities, shall:
1. be floodproofed so that below the base flood level the structure is
watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water;
-- -------- 2.- have structural- components capable -of resisting hydrostatic and
hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy;
-13-
55
3. be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the;
design and methods of construction are in accordance with accepted standards of practice, for
meeting provisions ofthis subsection, based on their development and/orreview ofthe structural
design, specifications and plans. Such certifications shall be provided to the official as set forth
in PAMC 15.12.220(C).
4. Non-residential structures that are elevated, not floodproofed, must meet
the same standards for space below the lowest floor as described in Sub-Section (A).
5. Applicants floodproofing non-residential buildings shall be notified that
flood insurance premiums will be based on rates that are at base flood level"
C. Manufactured Homes. All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially
improved within Zones A1- 30, AH, and AE on the City's FIRM shall be elevated on a permanent
foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is at or above the base flood
elevation and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system in accordance
with the provisions ofPAMC 15.12.260(A). This paragraph applies to manufactured homes to
be placed or substantially improved in an expansion to an existing manufactured home park or
subdivision. This paragraph does not apply to manufactured homes to be placed or substantially
improved in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision except where the repair,
reconstruction, or improvement ofthe streets, utilities and pads equals or exceeds 50 percent of
the value ofthe streets, utilities and pads before the repair, reconstruction or improvement has
commenced.
.
15.12.330 Floodways. Located within areas of special flood hazard as established in
Section 15.12.030 are areas designated as floodways. Since the floodway is an extremely .
hazardous area due to the velocity of floodwaters which carry debris, potential projectiles, and
erosion potential, the following provisions apply:
A. Encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, and
~__ -other .development are prohibited,_unless_certification_ by_a_regist~r.~(:LP1:ofessiQIlaJ~ngiJl~_eLo.J___.
architect is provided demonstrating that encroachments shall not result in any increase in flood
__~___ __ levels _~uring the occurrence of the base flood discharge.
B. -- ConstructiOJi-oifeconstrUction ofresidenfiiil- strucmres-is- proliibitedWitliiil---
designated floodways except for:
1. repairs, reconstruction or improvements to a structure which do not
increase the ground floor area; and .
2. repairs, reconstruction or improvements to a structure, the cost of which
does not exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure either
i. before the repair, reconstruction, or repair is started, or
ii. ifthe structure has been damaged, and is being restored, before the
damage occurred.
Work done on structures to comply with existing health, sanitary, or safety codes
which have been identified bv the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum
necessary to assure safe living conditions or to structures identified as historic places shall not
be included in the 50 percent.
. ---------C~If-S.ectinn- 15-.12~330(A)-is-satisfied;all-.new- construction-and- substantial------=:--~
improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions ofthis Chapter. .
-14-
56
.
15.12.335 Wetlands Management To the maximum extent possible, in order to avoid
the short and long tem1 adverse impacts associated with the destruction or modification of
wetlands, especially those activities which limit or disrupt the ability of the wetland to alleviate
flooding impacts, the following measures will be considered:
A. Review proposals for development within base flood plains for their possible
impacts on wetlands located within the flood plain.
B. Ensure that development activities in or around wetlands do not negatively affect
public safety, health, and welfare by disrupting the wetlands' ability to reduce flood and storm
drainage.
C. Request teclmical assistance from the Department of Ecology in identifying
wetland areas.
.
15.12.340 Coastal High Hazard Area. Located within areas of special flood hazard
established in P AMC 15.12.030 are Coastal High Hazard Areas, designated as Zones V1- V30,
VB and/or V. These areas have special flood hazards associated with high velocity Waters from
tidal surges and, therefore, in addition to meeting all provisions in this Chapter, the following
provisions shall also apply:
A. Due to the dynamic nature of coastal high hazard areas located along the Pacific
Ocean, in areas with designated Velocity Zones (V -zones) from Cape Disappointment to Cape
Flattery, the following standards shall apply:
1. Prohibit new or substantially improved construction in designated V-
zones; exceptions are for needed water dependent structures or structures that facilitate public
recreational access to the shore. Structures which require siting in the V-zone should be sited
landward of the primary dune if an active dune system is associated with the V-zone..
2. Prohibit any alteration of dunes in the above designated V -zones which
could increase potential flood damage; this restriction includes prohibiting any modification or
--------alteration or disturbance of vegetative cover associated with dunes 10catedin.designatedV-
zones.
.
B. . All new constru~tion and s_ubstan!ial im]JroveI11~Ilts in Zon~~"'-1~Y3 0 ~ndYE (y
lfbaseflood elevation data-Is-available) shall be elevated on pilings and columns so that:
1. the bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member of the lowest floor
(excluding the pilings or columns) is elevated to or above the base flood level; and
2. the pile or column foundation and structure attached thereto is anchored
. to resist flotation, collapse and lateral movement due to the effects of wind and water loads
acting simultaneously on all building components. Wind and water loading values shall each
have a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (100-year mean
recurrence interval).
A registered professional engineer or architect shall develop or review the
structural design, specifications and plans for the construction and shall certify that the design
and methods of construction to be used are in accordance with accepted standards of practice for
meeting the provisions of (1) and (2) of this Section.
C. Obtain the elevation (in relation to mean. sea level) of the bottom of the lowest
strifctufalmefuber of the-lowest f160t- (excluding pilings~aIia columris r bf-,lllriewcand
-15-
57
substantially improved structures in Zones VI-30 and VB, and whether or not such structures .
contain a basement. The local administrator shall maintain a record of all such information. .
D. All new construction shall be located landward of the reach of mean high tide.
E. Provide that all new construction and substantial improvements have the space
below the lowest floor either free of obstruction or constructed with non-supporting breakaway .
walls, open wood latticework, or insect screening intended to collapse under wind and water
loads without causing collapse, displacement or other structural damage to the elevated portion
of the building or supporting foundation system. For the purpose of this Section, a breakaway
walI shall have a design safe loading resistance of not less than 10 and no more than 20 pounds
per square foot. Use of breakaway walls which exceed a design safe loading resistance of 20
pounds per square foot (either by design or when so required by local or State codes) may be
permitted only if a registered professional engineer or architect certifies that the designs proposed
meet the following conditions:
1. breakaway wall collapse shall result from a water load less than that which
would occur during the base flood; and
2. the elevated portion of the building and supporting foundation system
shall not be subject to collapse, displacement, or other structural damage due to the effects of
wind and water loads acting simultaneously on all building components (structural and non-
structural). Maximum wind and water loading values to be used in this determination shall each
have a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (IOO-year mean
recurrence interval).
F. If breakaway walls are utilized, such enclosed space shall be usable solely for .
parking of vehicles, building access, or storage. Such space shall not be used for human
habitation.
G. Prohibit the use offill for structural support of buildings.
H. All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved within Zones V 1-
-c____'______~_~ 30~",V~ and~VE-on the-communitv's-FIRM-on,sites:-n -.-----~~--------~._---~-------------.
1. Outside of a manufactured home park or subdivision,
______ 2.__ In a new manufactured home park or subdivision, . _ ________ _ ____
3. In an expansion to an existing manufactured home park or subdivision,
or
4. In an existing manufactured home park or subdivision on which a
manufactured home has incurred "substantial damage" as the result of a flood: shall meet the
standards ofP AMC 15.12.260(A) through (C) and manufactured homes placed or substantially
improved on other sites in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision within Zones VI-
30, V, and VE on the FIRM shall meet the requirements ofPAMC 15.12.270(C).
1: Recreational vehicles placed on sites within Zones VI-30, V, and VB on the
community's FIRM either:
1. Be on the site for fewer than 180 consecutive days, or
2. Be fully licensed and ready for highway use, on its wheels or iacking
system. attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities and security devices, and have
no permanently attached additions: or . . . __~___
-- ----~-----T-----Meet the requiremenfsofPAMC 15~I2.240-( developmentpermitrequired)
and PAMC 15.12.340. paragraphs (A) through (G).
-16-
.
58
.
15.12.345 Standards for Shallow Flooding Areas (AO Zones)
Shallow flooding areas appear on FIRMs as AO zones with depth designations. The base
flood depths in these zones range from 1 to 3 feet above ground where a clearly defined chmmel
does not exist or where the path of flooding is unpredictable and where velocity flow may be
evident. Such flooding is usually characterized as sheet flow. In these areas, the following
provisions apply:
A. New constmction and substantial improvements of residential structures and
manufactured homes within AO zones shall have the lowest floor (including basement) elevated
above the highest adiacent grade to the stmcture, one foot or more above* the depth number
specified in feet on the communitvs FIRM (at least two feet above the highest adiacent grade to
the stmcture if no depth number is specified).
B. New construction and substantial improvements of nonresidential stmctures
within AO zones shall either:
1. Have the lowest floor (including basement) elevated above the highest
adiacent grade of the building site, one foot Of more above the depth number specified on the
FlRM (at least two feet if no depth number is specified): or
2. Together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, be completely flood
proofed to or above that level so that any space below that level is watertight with walls
substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with stmctural components having the
capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buovancv. If this
method is used. compliance shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect
as in section 5.2-2(3).
C. Require adequate drainage paths around structures on slopes to guide floodwaters
around and away from proposed structures.
D. Recreational vehicles placed on sites within AO Zones on the community's FIRM
are required to either:
----------- --.1-- Be on the site for fewer than 180 consecutive days, Of____c"___
2. Be fullv licensed and ready for highway use, on its wheels or iacking
. .... system, is attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities and security devices, and
has no permanently attached additions: or
1. Meet the requirements of 15.12.345' (A) and 15.12.345 (C) above and the
anchoring requirements for manufactured homes (Section 15.12.260 (A )(2) ).
.
ARTICLE V. VIOLATION
15.12.350 Violation is Misdemeanor. No structure or land shall hereafter be constmcted,
located, extended, converted, or altered without full compliance with the terms ofthis Chapter.
Violation or failure to comply with the provisions of this Chapter shall be a misdemeanor. Each
day that a violation continues shall constitute a separate offense. Nothing herein contained shall
prevent the City from taking such other lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any
violation.
.
-17-
59
Section 2. Severability. If any provisions ofthis Ordinance or its applications to any .
person or circumstances is held to be invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance or application of
~
the provisions ofthe Ordinance to other persons or circumstances is not affected.
Section 3 - Corrections.
The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary
corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of the
scrivener's/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, sectionlsubsectionnumbers and any
references thereto.
Section 4 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after its
\.
publication by summary.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the
day of March, 2006.
.
.
MAYOR
A T-TEST':
Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
PUBLISHED: March 12. 2006
By Summary
G:\LegaI_Backup\ORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONS\2006-02.FEMA Compliance-Chapter 15.012006. wpd
March 1,2006
-18-
60
.
ATTACHlVillNT B
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, amending a
portion of the Zoning Code, Title 17, of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES do hereby ordain as
follows:
Whereas, a revised Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City Council on June 14,
2004; and
Whereas, the City's development regulations need to be amended and updated to be
consistent with the City's revised Comprehensive Plan.
.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON,
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. _~__g~~ina~ce 1_2Q?-, as amended, and a portion of Title 17, Zoning Code, are
hereby amended to read as follows:
.
17.96.070 Hearing: and Appeal of Conditional or Unclassified Use Permit Applications.
A. Notice and Hearing for Conditional or Unclassified Use Permits. Upon filing an
application for a conditional or unclassified use permit in which the application sets forth fully
the grounds for, and the facts deemed to justify, the granting of a Conditional or Unclassified Use
Permit, the Planning Commission shall give public notice, as provided in P AMC 17.96.140, of
the intention to consider at a public hearing the granting of a Conditional or Unclassified Use
Permit.
The Planning Commission's decision shall be final unless appealed to the City Council.
B. Decisions. Conditional or Unclassified Use Permit decisions issued by the
Planning Commission, shall be set forth in writing and shall be accompanied by written findings
and conclusions. Decisions shall be deemed effective upon adoption of the written decision,
fmdings, and conclusions. A 14-day appeal period shall commence upon such adoption. On the
next business dayfollowingthe effective dateofthe decision, or as soon thereafteraspracticable,
the rlanning Department of Community & Economic Development shall mail copies of the
decision, findings and conclusions to the applicant and anyone else who has in writing requested
such notification and shalll?lace a legal notice of decision in the local newspaper.
61
-1-
C. Appeals.
1. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Planning Commission may .
appeal the decision to the City Council.
2. Appeals shall be submitted to the flanning Department of Community &
Economic Development in writing within fourteen (14) days following the date of the decision.
3. The City Council shall conduct a closed record hearing on the appeal of
the Planning Commission's decision with notice being gi ven as set f'Orth in f AMC 17.9G.140.
The Council's decision shall be fmal unless appealed to Clallam County Superior Court in
accordance with PAMC 17.96.150.
D. Permits Void After One Year. All conditional or unclassified use permits shall
become void one year from the date of granting such permits if use of the land or buildings or
applying for necessary building permits( s) has not taken place in accordance with the provisions
in granting said requests.
E. Extensions of Approved Conditional Use Permits. Extensions of approved
conditional use permits shall be considered in accordance with the same procedures as for the
original permit application, and may be granted for a period of one to five years, provided that
the following minimum criteria are met:
1. The use complies with the permit conditions.
2. There have been no significant, adverse changes in circumstances.
Upon written request for an extension submitted to the flanning Department of
Community & Economic Development prior to the expiration ofthy conditional use permit, said
conditional use permit shall be automatically extended for ninety days to allow the City adequate
time to review the extension request. .
F. Minor Amendment of Approved Conditional Use Permits.
1. Upon written request submitted to the flamling . Department of
Community & Economic Development, the flanning Director of Community & Economic
Development may~pprove a minor aII1~~d~ent to an_ approved conditional use permit if:
,a. The amendment does not increase the intensity oftlie useoy more----~
than .1 0% of the original approval;
-----~---------- b-:--The-amendmentwill-not be materially -detrimental to the public~---------
welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject
property is located; and \
c. The site has been posted and adjacent property owners notified
fifteen (15) days priorto the decision.
2. Any applications that are not granted a minor amendment by the flmming
Director of Community & Economic Development pursuant to this section must obtain an
amendment through the City's normal conditional use permit procedure.
Section 2. Severability. If any provisions of this Ordinance or its applications to any
person or circumstances is held to be invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance or application of
~--------~~the-provisions-ofthe Ordinance-to - other-persons or- circumstances-isnot.affected.
.
62
-2-
.
Section 3 - Corrections.
The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary
corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of the
scrivener's/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any
references thereto.
Section 4 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after its
publication by summary.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the
day of March, 2006.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
.
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
PUBLISHED: March 12, 2006
By Summary
G:\LegaJ _ Backup\ORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONS\2006-02.DevelopmentRegs-Chapter 17.0 I J 906. wpd
February 15,2006
.
63
-3- .
.
.
.
64
.
.
.
Attachment C
CITY OF
FORT.#GELES
...'."...........
._ :';F-"-
,r '
'-,' '..
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY& ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
TO: Chair Rasmussen and Planning Commissioners
FROM: Nathan West, Principal Planner
DATE: January 25, 2006
RE: Municipal Code Amendment - MCA 06-01
APPLICANT: City of Port Angeles Department of Community & Economic Development
PROP. OWNER:
Various
LOCATION:
City wide
PROPOSAL:
Amendment to Section 17.96 Special Provisions of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code with regard to Appeals and Section 15.12 Flood Damage
Prevention Ordinance
..u___.__~
_._-..~
RECOMMENDA TIO-N;--thePlarIDillgDivlslonof tl:le-UepartirientofCbmmunity-and-Ecbl1omic~------
Development recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval of
the Municipal Code Amendment as identified in the attachments.
PROPOSAL:
A request by the City Attorney directed staff to initiate a Municipal Code Amendment process
for discussion with regard to an inaccurate requirement as noted in section 17.96.070 (C) (3). This
section of code contains a mistake referencing a notice requirement for notification of a closed record
appeaL Such notice is not required in relation to a closed record appeaL See attachment A for the
recommended change.
On October 13,2005 Department of Ecology submitted a letter to the Mayor indicating that
specific changes to the Port Angeles Municipal Code were required for compliance with the National
Flood Insurance Program. The recommended changes required in section 15.12 which will ensure
the code is once again compliant. These changes are noted in attachment B.
65
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
p~ \ D \; MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - MCA 06-01
I ~j \ Section 15.12 and Section 17.96.070(C)(3)
I 'J
Vice Chair Kidd indicated that those who testify must sign the "Sign In" log and affirm
that their testimony willbe truthful to the best of their knowledge.
Principle Planner Nathan West reviewed the department staff report recommending that
the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council. A brief
discussion ensued as to how the proposed code amendment was brought to the City by The
Washington State Department of Ecology. This came about during a routine review by DoE that
occurs periodically. Commissioner Kalish asked how the code change would affect existing
properties. Mr. West indicated that only new structures would be affected. Planner Johns added
that a relatively small portion of the City actually is located within flood plains.
{
Vice Chair Kidd opened the public hearing. There being no testimony offered by the
Code Amendment to the City Council. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kalish
and passed 5 - o.
66
.
.
.
F'... O...R..r....'Pl.. .N...G.....E...'L.E..iSrJ
ij r ,I :.' . !' /. 1 i I ',.; 1 . ;i
............. '''j.. ... . ../....... ............ . ......... .., .......!p
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
MARCH 7, 2006
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PRELIMINARY SUBDIV SION - RALSTON
P ARK AVENUE AND PORTER STREETS
Summary: Preliminary approval of a subdivision in the RS-7 Residential Single Family zone.
Recommendation: The City Council should concur with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and grant preliminary approval to the proposed subdivision with 6 conditions, 20
findings, and 4 conclusions.
.
Back2:round / Analvsis: On February 8, 2006, the Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing for review of a preliminary subdivision that would divide an approximately 3.73 acre
parcel into 9 residential building sites. Following public review and general discussion, the
Planning Commission voted 6 - 0 in favor of a recommendation that the subdivision be approved
citing 6 conditions, 20 conditions, and 4 conclusions.
.---- The subdivision wilhesult in 3 lots that are further dividable and 610ts thatmeeHhe
minimum lot area for the RS-7 Residential Single Family zone. The lots that are further dividable
front along ParkAvenue._Lotsthat meettherni11irnum lcrLsize are10cat~d along the south propert.y...
--- -~._~_.- ------.-. -------.
line, which fronts on Highland Avenue. Access to the area is provided from either Highland
Avenue, Porter Street, or Park Avenue. Utilities in the area are adequate to serve the proposed
subdivision.
Staffs report is attached for your review along with an excerpt of the minutes of the
February 8th meeting.
Attachments: Planning Commission Minutes Excerpt
Department Report
.
67
.
.
.
68
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT A
CONDITIONS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF THE RALSTON SUBDIVISION.
Conditions:
1.
A 10-foot strip ofland shall be dedicated to the City for the Park Avenue right-of-way.
Park Avenue shall be constructed per the City's Urban Service Standards, which includes
a paved sidewalk, curbing, and paving prior to approval of the final plat. Street
improvements shall be made to Public Works and Utilities Department standards prior to
final plat approval.
The fire hydrant spacing shall be as required by the City Fire Department to a maximum
1000' of separation distance. Any multi-family residences that are constructed shall be
fitted with sprinkler systems.
Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground.
Stormwater improvement plans shall be submitted for approval per the City's Urban
Services Standards and Guidelines and constructed or bonded for prior to final plat
approval.
Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works
Department.
Building setbacks shall be identified on the final plat and address numbers provided by
the Building Division shall be placed on the lots.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Findings:
1. Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) sets forth local requirements
-- for the approval of subdivisions. ----- ---"--------- -------
2. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the
--- uniform division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.11 0 requires a
city to inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment
of a subdivision. It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited
to, the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets
or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes,
parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all
other relevant facts including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe
walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school and whether the public
interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved
unless the city can make written findings that these provisions are made.
Section 16.08.050(B)(1) PAMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine the
proposed plat, along with written recommendations of the City Departments, and shall
either approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded
to the City Councilwithin a period of 2.0 days aft~l" a Pl"~liminary plat has been~!!l:n1}i!!~d
to the City Planning Department. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the
proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting.
3.
69
4. The Port Angeles Public Works and Utilities, and Fire Departments reviewed the
proposed subdivision. Their comments have been incorporated in the Department's
recommendation.
Preliminary approval is based upon a drawing dated received December 29,2005,
prepared for John and Gail Ralston by Zenovic and Associates.
The subject property is partially identified as Low Density Residential with the northern
portion located in an indeterminate boundary between Low Density Residential and High
Density Residential on the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The following
Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth
Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A.2, Goal B, Policy B.l,
B.2, B.3, and BA, Goal C; Transportation Element Goal A, Policy A.3, A.6, and A.ll;
Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goal A, B,
Policy B.1, B.3, BA, B.5, B.6, B.7, C.1, C.2, C.3, CA, C.5, and C.7.
8. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer
service and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9).
9. The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Policy B.3) states that development
should be designed to further the grid system pattern. Preliminary approval will be based
upon the dedication of right-of-way to ensure compliance with the policy.
10. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Residential, Single
Family, RS-7, which allows a density of up to 6.22 dwelling units per acre. The proposed
drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 7,050 square
feet in size.
5.
6.
7.
11. The site is currently served by Park Avenue and Porter Streets which are collector arterials
and designated school walking routes.
12. There are no environmentally sensitive areas on the site. The site slopes slightly
________do}-\'!1\Yarg fro Ill_the sQll:tl1~l:l.st t().Jh~yve~!:_Th~~i1e_ is ~()!~()!1sidere~L'!Jrequ~I?:!!YJ'!()_~~~~__.
area as it is not listed on the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) maps which
denote those areas that are in 100-year flood areas.
~__.__._..._,___~._~_..,____._,._____,...__~~_.__ __~~_~_____~_._______._ _..______"u._________
13. Transit service is available along Lauridsen Boulevard, located approximately 14 mile
north of the site.
14. Building permits are required for all structures on the completed sites. All local building
and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler
systems.
15. The Port Angeles School District has been notified of the development to allow them to
plan for needed public school facilities and routes. The nearest school bus stop is located
at Mt. Angeles Road and Park Avenue.
16. All utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in
the area.
17.
---------18~
The City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments will serve the site.
. The City's State-Environmental Policy Act (SEP A)-Official issued-a-Determination of-u
Nonsignificance (DNS #1139) on February 1,2006, therefore satisfying the City's
responsibility under the Act.
70
.
.
.
\~
~.
~
19. Improvements to Park Avenue will be required such that the final roadway is an improved
width of 40-feet with curb and a 6' pedestrian sidewalk established on the south side per
the City's development standards. A 10- foot dedication of right-of-way will be required
along the south side of Park A venue and a 30- foot dedication along the north side of
Highland A venue will be required. The dedication of land for Highland Avenue will
include adequate area to construct a cul-de-sac at the west end of Highland Avenue.
Porter Street currently meets City standards.
20. The Planning Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The
Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval.
Reports are advisory only to ensure conformance of the proposed subdivisiQn to the
general purposes of the City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and
specifications adopted by the City.
Conclusions:
A.
As conditioned, the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance,
Chapter 16.08 PAMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW.
As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and
general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that
assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school.
As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting of this subdivision as
articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The
subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles
consistent with the Growth Management Act.
B.
C.
D.
71
.-
---_.__.~- -------
-
-~ -- - --- - ~--
-------,
-
-.
----. --..-----..
r~~ -~.~ - ~~~_.. . -~~
.,1
Department of Community & Economic Development Staff Report
Ralston Subdivision
February 8, 2006
Page 14
~,
7. No lot or lots for residential purposes shall be divided or sold into additional lots or
building sites, without compliance with Title 16 P AMC.
S. SIGNAGE One (1) free standing sign no larger than twenty-four (24) square feet
in area shall be permitted for identification of the subdivision.
~
~\
92
j
,
,
,
,
J :
)
.
, ,
I I
I I
I I
, I
I I
I I
, I
, I
I I
, I
I I
68
LOT 4-C
7050 SF %
o
LOT 3-A
211BO ;W%
64 '\
LOT 3-B LOT 3-C LOT 2-8
7135 SH 7135 SH ,~ 7135 SF%
120'
lBO'
I
Ii
u
------, ..
I ,
I \
L__
I
I
I
,
,
.., .--1
I , I
I , I
[------------------, :
I
:
I
64
.
,
I
I
:
,
,
I
I
I
"
"
LJ
PK
PARCEL NO.: ,
r
-l-
r-
11 \
<) \\
\~l
~
'"
~
l!!
\J
~
k
'l!
!
l:'l ,i
1!1!ii6[ I
V1iOll"I.l.
00)0.1 (
..: I!.
tnl........!
8~~~1
~l:!:l!.i
ll:~;;;~i
..~li-:;
CJt3:z:~:
w)D..D..~l
r-
j
0.
:>-
0::
--<
Z
~
:J
w
0::
0.
U)
W
o(l E;;; I
~U,i
>0:
o U) I
Z U)!
W--<,'
N
I
~
2: :;]
f::! '"
~ k
;t
'i,;
., ctJ 4r
Clmg
~)C"
"'ifi(
~ol5
'" ~O:Q.I
"i
::J
u
!
~
"
r
I
I -L__
1___-
~
.~
I!l
9
b
~
1
~
~
SUB-
r---
L____
+
w
~
SCALE, qD
ATE:' C>.BER 200S'
DEemS
FILE:
.
8
-.---!
i
,
-I
\
\
\
\ :
\ i
\ ,
II
J I
II
d
I I !I
I 11
f I I"
, I I
I I,
--L___'~"---L.Jr-'__,~_
~ I
\ I
----.-."-j--I---r---
I I I
I I i
I I I
I 1 I
!
-....~-CO"____,q~________.~
Park AVe.
. .... .q~... "'. . -._"-
----------
I-
I
I
I
,
I
!
i
I
f
r
I
I
I
I
i I
I /
I i
f I f
i I
I I
f / I
11-- _nt-un
--r-j __/!.________
I _1_ ____
,. --i------ - I
i i
--.~--'--.L____ _ i ~~;:~.
:~': I~rl
f // f,
\ / / I I
V / ,I f I
. I I
\ I
I / j !
r / ! f f
I I I,
f I / I
II /'____
I !.. ._
- ! --f----~-- .-------/ --- r
Iii 1,':"\;,;.~,"'Hi' I
! J j !i;~i,{;\ Ii
. i~;i~\r~?i i
J t
f~,,- " ., .=._,~ i
~~""~.... -
~-'----1
I
I
;
,
I
I
J
r
i
J
-r
I
L
94
. L
I
j
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
f
i
i
f
i
I'"
., I
I J
/ I-
I I
I I
I \ /__',
I '..... ./ /_..... "
' ------- ( -',,',
: " \ \
I , I I
t" I /'-'..... "/ I
' I I '\. ;.._/ /
' I I 1___, \ /
II 1 I \ /
I l", L_j I
\ I
\ I
'~ (_ I
I 1 1 I
1---------_-" I I
I I
I ,
I I
-r---r-"'____
- ... .".- -. ....h~.~_.__._h_ .__~._~_
. .._-"'.~"" '----.."
. '. .. . .", ---""""--.................--..........--..-----::-;.--.......;
_:/;ifgh/~nd:.J.\Jve. J --i-~,' -- --r:::J/
,/ I I I ! I J :
/ I f I I I /
I i I I
I f ,-.1
I .
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
J
I
I
r
i
i
"j
I
j
I
I
f
{
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
j
i
I
I
I
I
j .
I~-
/ .
I
i
..-----_l
f
f
1
I
-T--__
-/_.---
. .
I
"c-~
I ~.'-_.~~
I
i
,
.
l
1 '1
I \'_
i
!
I
I
I
,
CiS I .
~ !
1::; !
0; I
Q,' I
I
I
,
I
. l__
- -;-~...I--..-~--~---
I
,-
(
---(-----
\
'-
~: ~o' 'R" r'- ~'}2! N. ,'G' 'E. ,.t' EiS'
I.~," '., ' .' " I ,
,-~, '.' ,.....'., ! - -, ". '
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
MARCH 7,2006
To:
CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
DAN MCKEEN, FIRE CHIEF
~.
i
- i
SUBJECT:
FIRE DEPARTMENT MASTER MUTUAL Am AGREEMENT
Summary: The City currently has a master mutual aid agreement with its neighboring fire
districts - Clallam County Fire Districts #2, #3, and #4. This agreement allows for the sharing of
fire resources should a participating jurisdiction be faced with a large-scale emergency that
exceeds the resource capability of that jurisdiction. The existing Master Mutual Aid Agreement
expires on April 1, 2006.
.
The participating agencies revised the existing Agreement to include provisions that are intended
, to provide for safer and more effective joint operations and to provide added clarity.
Recommendation: Approve the revisions to the fire Master Mutual Aid Agreement and extend
the duration of the Agreement for one year, with the provision the Agreement will automatically
'renew from year to year unless terminated as outlined in the Agreement._c ______u__
Background / Analysis:
In 1996, the City of Port Angeles entered into a master mutual aid agreement with the City's
neighboring fire districts - Clallain County Fire Districts #2, #3 & #4. This agreement allows for
the rapid mobilization of local fire resources that can be used to assist the City in mitigating the
effects of an extraordinary event. This mobilization only occurs after the City's fire department
arrives on scene and determines that additional resources are needed that are beyond the capacity
of the City to provide.
The basis for this agreement is the underlying fact that no community can provide the resources
sufficient to mitigate all potential emergencies. Through responsible planning, the City and
neighboring fire departments can cost-effectively ensure that additional resources are readily
available for large-scale emergencies within our community.
.
95
In consi&ration of the mutual covenants herein and the benefits to be derived by the .
citizens residing within their respective boundaries, the parties listed on the title page do hereby
agree as follows:
1. PURPOSE
This Mutual Aid Agreement is entered into by Clallam County Fire District #2, Clallam
County Fire District #3, Clallam County Fire District #4, (herein collectively called the Fire
Districts), the City of Port Angeles, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (herein
called the City), in order to provide enhanced protection for the lives and property of the citizens
residing in their respective boundaries. To this end, the Fire Districts and the City agree to render
each other the maximum cooperation practicable in the sharing of personnel, equipment, and
technical expertise in order to deal with large fires, natural and man-made disasters, or other
emergencIes.
The parties agree that the added protection provided to their citizens is, for all purposes,
adequate considera,tion for any costs or. expenditures . for equipment, personnel, and other
resources incurred by the parties. 'The parties further agree that by pooling available resources,
the maximum protection to the public can be provided.
This Agreement is not intended to provide an ALS response through mutual aid to those
jurisdictions that cannot provide a reasonable degree of a similar response.
.
n. AUTHORITY
The parties enter into this Agreement pursuant to the authority vested in them under the
---following -provisions-of-the-Iaw of the State of Washington:-Chapters 3 8 .52,_39.3.4,. and 52.12. and______.
Sections 35.84.040, 52.36.025, and 76.04.135 of the Revised Code of Washington.
ill.
RENDERING MUTUAL AID
A. Request for Assistance
The officer in charge at the scene of an emergency within the boundaries of his
jurisdiction is authorized to request assistance from any party to this Agreement,
if the officer determines that additional resources are needed that are beyond the
capacity of their jurisdiction to provide.
Response to Request for Assistance
Upon receiving a reques,t for aid, the officer oft4e requested agency shall:
1. Immediately determine if resources ?T~ available and can be spared.
2. Determine what resources might most effectively be dispatched.
3. When appropriate, a Chief or senior officer shall be dispatched with the
.. ----.~------~ mutual. aid resources.------ ---.---------- - ----------~-
4. Dispatch the designated resources with complete instructions as to their
assigned mission.
B.
.
)
98
2
.
.
.
C.
Inability to Render Assistance
Each party agrees that mutual aid response under this Agreement should not
jeopardize or interfere with the immediate emergency response needs within its
own jurisdiction. If for any reason a mutual aid response cannot be made, the
requested agency will immediately notify the PENCOM emergency dispatch
center.
D. Command Responsibility
Incident Command responsibility rests with the jurisdiction where the incident
requiring mutual aid has occurred. Any other command position may be
delegated, in whole or in part, to any senior officer from any participating mutual
aid agency.
E. On-Scene Consumable Supplies
Agencies requesting assistance shall provide motor fuel, welfare items for
firefighters and other responders, and other consumables to the extent supplies are
available.
F. Equipment Salvage
All persons involved in a mutual aid operation shall exercise due diligence in
salvaging lost or damaged equipment and ensuring that it is returned to its owner.
IV.
OPERATIONAL STANDARDS
All participating parties agree to comply with the following operational standards:
1. The Clallam County Fire Chief s Association's uniform frequency designations.
.---2.-. The-Clallam County.Fire . Chiefs __Association's standardized.... personneL
accountability system.
'[he Incident Command System and the National Incident Management System,
as appropriate, for effective and efficient utilization of resources..
"I
".
V. HOLD HARMLESS
Each party rendering assistance per this agreement, agrees to protect, defend, and hold
harmless every other party from and against all liability, claims, damages, losses, expenses,
including attorney fees occurring, arising or resulting from the party's acts or omissions in
rendering of such assistance; provided that nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit any party to
this Agreement from seeking damages from any individual or entity which may have been
responsible for the emergency conditions for which mutual aid was requested.
VI. DURATION
. The duration of this AgreemenLshalLbe . for one year..However,.the Agreemel1tshall be~.._~__..
automatically continued from year to year unless terminated as provided below.
99
"I
"
VII. -MODIFICATION, REVIEW AND TERMINATION
.
A. ModificationlReview
This agreement may be modified by mutual agreement of all parties hereto, and
shall be reviewed no less than every five years, with any modifications executed
in the same manner as this Agreement.
B. Termination
Either party can terminate this Agreement by providing a letter of intent to
terminate with not less than sixty-days (60) notice prior to the termination date.
Said letter shall be sent to the Chief and governing body of the affected
jurisdictions.
C. Resource List
Within thirty-days (30) of execution of this Agreement, each party shall make
available to every other party an up-to-date list of all equipment available for
mutual aid. This list will be reviewed, revised, or modified annually.
VIII. SUPPLEMENTAL MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS
This Agreement is non-exclusive. Any party hereto may negotiate any other operational
agreement.
.
IX. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE
The laws of the State of Washington govern this Agreement, and any actions brought
~---~-------~ hereunder -shall-be -brought exclusively-in-the ..Superior--CourLfor the_ State_oL W ashington_ in~____
Clallam County.
x.
FILING
As approved by RCW 39.34.010, the Agreement shall be filed with the County Auditor.
.
100
4
.
.
.
EXECUTED this
for the City of Port Angeles
Karen A. Rogers, Mayor
EXECUTED this
for Clallarn County Fire District #2.
Richard Ruud, Chair
EXECUTED this
for Clallarn County Fire District #3.
.. Richard Houts, Chair
EXECUTED this
for Clallarn County Fire District #4.
George Oldfield, Chair
101
5
day of
,2006,
Dan McKeen, Fire Chief
day of
,2006,
Jon Bugher, Fire Chief
day of
,2006,
Steve Vogel, Fire Chief
day of
, 2006,
Dave Chastain, Fire Chief
.
.
.
102
EXISTING AGREEMENT
.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Master Mutual Aid Agreement
For the Provision of
Emergency Services
to Areas of
.
Clallam County
Participants:
.
Port Angeles Fire Department
Clall~ County Fire District #2
Clallam County Fire District #3..
.- ....-------_._--_.__.-._._-~-----_..~._-~-_._._- - -.... -..',------ ------"--~".,.._._._-~-,.._,.,"._---_..__..__.__._--_.---~_.__. ._.-.-._-_._---~_._-_._--_._-------._--- ------. '.,-- ._.__...._~
Clall~ County Fire District #4 '
103
,_ - _.. '.,' - ... ____".,.._.._..__~_.___..,.. 'nn____ ____ ."..__._ _ ____ ...n._,__
---'---'---~
~,
,. ~
In consideration of the mutual covenants herein and the
benefits to be derived by the citizens residing within their .
respective boundaries, the parties listed on the title page do
hereby agree as follows:
1) PURPOSE
The mutual aid agreement is entered into by the listed fire
districts (herein collectively called the Fire Districts), the City
of Port Angeles, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington
(herein called the City), in order to provide maximum protection
for the lives and property of the citizens residing in their
respective boundaries. To this end, the Fire Districts, City,
agree to render each other the maximum cooperation practicable in
the sharing of personnel, equipment, and technical expertise in
order to deal with large fires, military attack, or other disasters
or emergencies.
The parties agree that the added protection provided to their
citizens is, for all purposes, adequate consideration for any costs
C?r expenditures for equipment, personnel, and other resources
incurred by the parties. The parties further agree that by pooling .
available resources the maximum protection to the pURlic can be
provided.
2}
AUTHORITY
The parties enter into this agreement pursuant to the
authority vested in them under the following provisions of the law
o-f-the -State oCWasnington :Chapters-38--:-5-2~--3-9-:-3-4~-aild-52--:T2~and---
Sections 35.84.040, 52.36.025, and 76.04.135 of the Revised Code of
Washington.
3} DURATION
The term of this agreement shall
commencing on ____----8.,P-ril 2. 19!16
April 1, __2_Q01______
automatically renewed for an
any party objects in writing.
be for
This
additional sixty
1
104
sixty (60) months
and termination on
agreement will be
(60) months unless
.
.
.
.
4)
MODIFICATION, TERMINATION, AND REVIEW
A) Modification:
This agreement may be modified by mutual agreement of all
parties hereto, executed in the same manner as this agreement.
B) Termination:
This agreement may be terminated as to any single party when
that party gives notice to all the other parties in writing at
least sixty (60) days prior .to the intended withdrawal from this
agreement.
C) Review:
Within thirty (30) days of execution of this agreement, each
party shall provide to every other party an up-to-date list of all
equipment and personnel available for mutual aid. This list will
be reviewed, revised, or modified by.December 30th of each year and
a revised copy provided to each party.
5)
RENDERING MUTUAL AID
A) Response Request for Aid
Any pa:LtY"_!-?i::J:1~s agI"~~Il1~:rl!- may. request a.l.....cl, from any other party to
- - --------- ---- ..- ------..----------------..--------.--... .
. __m_________
__ __ - __m___
this agreement in dealing with fire or other disasters and
emergencies. Upon receiving a request for aid, the officer in
charge shall:"
1) immediately determine if apparatus and personnel are
available and can be spared;
2) determine what apparatus might most effectively be
dispatched;
3) if necessary or desirable, assign personnel and/or
apparatus in accordance with any mutual aid plans of the
parties;
4)
dispatch the designated apparatus with
instructions as to their assigned mission.
complete
2
105
,------
!
!
, '
B) Inability to Render Assistance
.
Rendering assistance under this agreement is not mandatory but
the parties agree to make good faith efforts to render aid.
However, the requesting agency shall be informed of the reason why
assistance cannot be rendered. The agency requested to render
assistance has the sole authority to determine whether the
requested assistance should be rendered.
C) Operational Command
The officer in charge, on the scene, of the party requesting
assistance shall assume full charge of all apparatus and personnel
at, the scene of an emergency. Operational command may be
relinquished in whole or in part to any senior officer of a party
rendering assistance, but the officer in charge is not thereby
relieved of responsibility for the operation.
D) Consumable Supplies
Agencies requesting assistance shall provide motor fuel,
lubricating fuel, welfare items for firefighters and other
responders, and other consumables to the extent supplies are .'
available.
E) Equipment Salvage
All persons involved in a mutual aid operation shall
due diligence in salvaging lost or damaged equipment and
-----------~that'- i t-is--r.eturned- to-itB-rightful--owner:----~----
exercise
ensuring
6) LIABILITY AND PARTICIPATION
Except as set forth in Chapters 38.52, 52.12 RCW, and Federal
Tort Claims Act, 28 USC 2674 et seq., none of the parties of this
agreement shall be liable to any other party for damages resulting
from loss of equipment, injury to personnel, or payment of
compensation arising as a resplt of assistance rendered under the
terms of this agreement. To the extent possible, the agency
requesting assistance shall attempt to obtain indemnity and other
financial assistance from federal and state or private agencies
having such authority and resources to reimburse any losses or
----------l-iabi lity-f or-damage s-incurred-by--any-as s isting-agency:----
3
.
"
106
_ 0
o '
.
.
.
'-
7) NON-DISCRIMINATION
During the performance of this agreement, the parties agree to
abide by the terms of Executive Order 1 1 246 on non-discrimination
and will not discriminate against any person because of race,
color, religion, sex or national origin. The parties will take
affirmative action to the extent required and permitted by law to
ensure that applicants are employed without regard to their race,
color, religion, sex or national origin. The parties will, to the
extent required and permitted by law comply with applicable
provisions of the ,ADA.
8) SUPPLEMENTAL MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS
It is understood that the agreements entered into hereunder
and any corresponding mutual aid operational plans that may be
adopted shall not supplant preexisting mutual aid agreements nor
deny the right of any party hereto to negotiate supplemental mutual
aid agreements.
9) GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE
This agreement is governed by the laws of the State of
Washington, and any actions brought hereunder shall be brought
exclusively in the Superior Court for the State of Washington in
Clallam County.
10) OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT
No---member--of or~delegate-- to-Congress-;-- or--resident--~c
Commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part of this
agreement, or to benefit th~t may arise therefrom, but this
provision shall not be construed to extend to this agreement if
made with a corporation for its general benefit.
4
107
~ '.' I .z:~
EXECUTED this
City of Port Angeles.
c9"M..
day of
tJpJy:O
(/~ ,~C) \-<'<<>~- .
~ Mayor
, 1996, for the
.
/11' ~
EXECUTED this ~ ~ day of
Clallam County Fire District #2.
1J!f~
I 1996, for
;{J~~~/
Chairman
EXECUTED this I g +h day of
Clallam County Fire District #3.
I 1996, for
.
EXECUTED this
Clall~m County Fire District #4.
j7~.
day of ~~
I 1996, for
-7U&-~- .-..-' -
Chairman
5
.
108
.
.
~:'o/mR.)T..."..:PJ.' .' N' ..G;,..E..L...... E'..'S'.'
; ,. - ;:" : .: - '.-: .....-.: :'"":
: ......../'. ,J' .: }.: .' .. .-' ;, ,,'
: ..- "' - ..,.
. 1.- . - .!-~ . ..- ..... .
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MARCH 7, 2006~
CITY COUNCIL .
SCOTT K. JOHl''{S/2\.SS CIATE PLANNER
/
REZONE OF PROPERT FROM RS-7 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO RMD
RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY
Summary: A request to rezone property from RS- 7 Residential Single Family to RMD Residential
Medium Density.
Recommendation: Following.t!te public !tearing, staffrecommends t!tat the City Council approve
the proposed rezone from RS-7 to RMD by adoption of the attached ordinance citing the findings
and conclusions identified in Exhibit B of the attached ordinance.
Back!!:round / Analvsis: A request for the rezone of approximately 3.73 acres from RS-7 Residential
Single Family to RMD Residential Medium Density was heard at the Planning Commission meeting
of February 28, 2006. The request is to rezone an area approximately 180 feet by 425 feet located
south ofPm:k Avenue and west of Porter Street. -
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map identifies the subject property as being located in the
imprecise margin between High Density Residential (HDR) and Low Density Residential (LDR).
Extension of the High Density Residential designation across the right-of-way onto the adjoining
property identifies the intent to consider the area within the imprecise margin (the subject property) as
an area that could potentially be designated for high density zoning. Following review of the City's
development ordinances and policy direction, staff determined that the proposal meets the intent of the
Subdivision Ordinance, Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and is served by utilities that can
support a higher density zoning for the subject property. Additionally, the site is located close to
schools and is near a bus route so it can adequately meet the test for higher density zoning proposals.
Following the public hearing conducted by the Planning Commission on February 8, 2006, the
Commission review resulted in a tied vote (3 - 3). The main issues were the neighborhood concerns
that the rezone would allow development intended to create residential space for students attendingthe
nearby Peninsula Collage, and the historic drainage concerns of the entire area. Opponents also raised
problems of additional traffic and uncontrolled speeding along Park Avenue.
Staffs Report including public comment letters and an excerpt of the February 8th minutes is
attached for your review. As the March ih meeting is a public hearing, staff will be prepared to
provide a presentation at Council's direction. .
Attachments: Ordinance, [mdings, and conclusions
Minutes Excerpt
Staff Report
109
----,
.
.
.
110
.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
rezoning property in the 1100 block of Park Avenue from RS-
7 (Residential, Single Family) to RMD (Residential, Medium
Density).
WHEREAS, the Planning Co~mission of the City of Port Angeles has considered
an application to rezone from RS-7 to RMD the property in the 1100 block of Park Avenue and
described in the attached Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council
approval of the rezone application; and
WHEREAS, the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (Chapter 43.21 C
.
RCW) have been met; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after conducting a public hearing and considering the
Planning Commission's recommendation, finds that there have been changes in circumstances
since the current zoning of the property was adopted and that the proposed rezone is in the best
interest of the City and its citizens and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
DO HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
/
Section 1.
The Findings and Conclusions marked Exhibit B and attached are
hereby adopted and entered.
Section 2.
The Official Zoning Map, Ordinance 2801 as amended, is hereby
amended to change the zoning of that property described in Exhibit A from RS-7 (Residential,
.
Single Family 7,000 square feet) to RMD (Residential, Medium Density).
- 1 -
111
Section 3.
The City Clerk is hereby directed to attach a copy ofthis Ordinance to
the Official Zoning Map and to file certified copies with the Clallam County Auditor and
Clallam County Assessor.
Section 4 - Effective Date.
date of its publication by summary.
This Ordinance shall take effect five days following the
PASSED by the City Council ofthe City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
day of March, 2006.
Council held on the
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
PUBLISHED: March .2006
By Summary
MAYOR
G:\Legal_BackupIORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONS\2006-05.RalstonRezone.022806. wpd
March 1, 2006
- 2 -
112
.
.
.
.
Exhibit A - Ralston REZ 06-05
Legal Description:
The northerly 180 feet oflots 2, 3, and 4 of Highland View Acre Tracts and
Lots 1 and 2 of Short Plat SHP 03-04 filed in V olurne 31 of Short Plats, P 65,
Townsite of Port Angeles.
.
.
- 3 -
113
, -
.
.
.
114
~~~~one ~6-0
i I I I
II 1 I .....;
. I - ,
~_I f\ ../ Are_a to be rezoned
-~~- ~_j L RS 7 to RMD
"'-.. -~_."-~"~...
----IT
l
!
J
I
f
i
I
i
...L.
.L
<in
I
j
,
,
;
i
i
I
i
I
I
i
1
I
I
R
D cn\j
1
f
I
I
I
I
I
- l
i
I
I
I~
I
.. -.-(--.-- -..- --...--.-..
. ._.~,."._.
L
-J
Legend
parcel
- Street centerline
II parcel selection
9 L L
.
.
.
I
I
-
.
.
.
EXHIBIT B
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF REZ 06-01 - RALSTON
Findings
1. On December 29,2005, John Ralston submitted a request to rezone approximately 1.86
acres from Residential Single Family RS-7 to Residential Medium Density.
2. The City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is intended as the guiding document in
establishing a conceptual framework for land use decisions.
3. The location supports several other multi-family developments and is found opposite the
main BP A power substation and near Peninsula College. Medium density housing
should be located where a higher concentration of residents is compatible with existing
development.
4. The proposed zoning would create a buffer between the BP A substation and the existing
residential zoning.
5. The property is described as Lots 1 through 4 Block 1 Highland View Tracts and is
situated in the southwest corner of Park Avenue and Porter Streets.
6.
7.
The subject site'is currently undeveloped.
The purpose of the RMD zone (P AMC 17.14.010) is "to provide for a mix of single-
family, duplexes, and apartments at a density greater than single-family neighborhoods
but less than the higher densities of the RHD zone. Commercial uses are not considered
to be compatible. Few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and then only'
conditionally, because of land use impacts associated with nonresidential uses. This zone
provides for a variety in the urban land use pattern for the City's lower density multi-
family residential neighborhoods (at twice the density of the City's basic singlefamily
residential neighborhoods) with direct access on an arterial street, usually located in
outlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable land, and serving as a transitional
use between low density residential uses and commercial/industrial uses."
Residential development in the RMD zone may develop on lots 7,000 sq. ft. in size with
maximum lot coverage of 30%. The density shall not exceed two dwelling units for the
first 7,000 sq. ft. plus one dwelling unit for each additional 3,500 sq. ft. up to a maximum
of 12.44 dwelling units per acre. Residential development in the RS-7 zone requires a
minimum lot area of 7,000 square feet for each unit and maximum lot coverage of30%.
The RS-7 zone allows for develop up to 6.22 Dwelling units per acre.
A rezone proposal cannot be considered a spot zone if it meets the following tests: 1) the
parcel of land has not been singled out for special and privileged treatment; 2) the
singling out is in the public interest and not only for the benefit of the l~nd owner; and 3)
the action is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates properties in the area as being
located along an imprecise margin between Residential High Density and Residential
Low Density. An imprecise margin is designated to allow expansion of a particular
designation in specific instances on an individual basis.
The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed in its entirety with respect to the proposal. ,The
following elements, goals, and policies were found to be most relevant to the proposal:
117
8.
9.
10.
11.
"
Findings and Conclusions Rezone 06-0 I
March 21, 2006
Page 2
Growth Management Element Goal A, and Policies A.I (a); Land Use Map Goal A and
Policy A.1, 2; Land Use Element Residential Goals A and Policy A.I, A.2 and Objective
I; Goal B, and C, Policy C.I, C.2, C.3, C.4; Transportation Element Goal A and Policy
A.3; goal B, and Policy B.I4, and Objective B.1.
The City's inventory of land zoned for low density (RS-7 & RS-9) is approximately
2,045 acres or 38.7%. The inventory of Residential Medium and Residential High
Density (RMD & RHD) zoned land is approximately 279 acres or 5.3%. (2003 figures)
Analysis of the buildable land supplies of various zones has shown that there are limited
medium and high-density neighborhood lands remaining undeveloped.
Peninsula College recently removed on campus dormitory space further exacerbating the
housing supply.
The public comment and notification period for the Planning Commission meeting ran
from December 29 to January 31,2006; Twelve comment letters were received from the
public as a result of the public notification process. The main issues of concern were
regarding the safety of pedestrians, mainly students walking to the elementary school,
potential activity of assumed occupants of future development, and local drainage issues.
The letters were included in staffs continued review of the proposal.
The SEP A Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance on February
1,2006.
16. The City's Public Works and Utilities Department did not have any comment on the
rezone proposal. Utilities are presently available in the area and have recently been
upgraded to support current and future developments in the area. The Fire Department
has no objection to the rezone but notes that if medium density housing includes multi-
. family dwellings (tri-plex or larger), sprinkler systems will be required.
17. Future development of the subject property to other than single family residential use will
require specific project review and will include conditions to address issues such as
access, parking, noise, lighting, landscaping, and environmentally sensitive review.
12.
13.
14.
15.
18. Section 17.96.100 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code identifies procedures for
amendment to (rezone) the City's Zoning Map.
'-
Conclusions:
1.
2.
The proposal is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map.
The site is adjacent to both Park Avenue and Porter Street, both of which are collector
arterials and school walking routes. Future development proposals should anticipate the
necessity to install sidewalks for the provision of safe walking conditions along the
school walk!ng routes.
The site can provide a logical transition between land uses that will not adversely impact
the existing development in the area.
3.
118
.
.
.
.
.
.
Findings and Conclusions Rezone 06-01
March 21, 2006
Page 3
4. The rezone is compatible with the surrounding zoning and land uses and will allow
development of the site to a higher density that has been identified as desired for the area
by the City through its Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation.
5. The City's action on rezone application REZ 06-01 is consistent with the established
procedures for amending the Zoning Code set forth in Section 17.96.100, Port Angeles
Municipal Code.
6. Municipal utilities in the area are adequate to supply power, water, communications, and
sewer for multiple family housing development in the area. Ultimate development plans
may require further improvement by the developer. As no adverse impacts to
neighboring streets are anticipated and street, walkway, parking, and drainage will also
be required with subsequent development, the proposed rezone is in the public interest.
7. The proposal will provide additional much needed property for the development of
multiple family housing units, which is in the public interest.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of March 21, 2006
Karen A. Rogers, Mayor
Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk
119
.
.
.
120
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
FebmGlJ'8,2006
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
REZONE REOUEST - REZ 06-01 - RALSTON - Approximately 1.86 acres
located between Park A venue and Highland Avenue west of Porter Street.
\
Proposal to rezone from RS- 7 Residential Single Family to RMD Residential
Medium Density.
Under the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, Commissioner Cherie Kidd noted that she is
associated with the applicant, Commissioner Rasmussen noted that he owns the building in
which the applicant's representative works, and Commissioner Kalish lives in the general
neighborhood around the Peninsula College. No one from the audience objected to any member
of the Commission remaining to act on the proposals.
Associate Planner Scott Johns presented the Department report recommending approval
of the rezone as proposed. Chair Rasmussen noted that those who testify must sign in and affirm
that their testimony will be truthful to the best of their knowledge and opened the public hearing.
Steve Zenovic, Zenovic and Associates, 519 South Peabody, explained the proposal and
responded to questions regarding improvements, drainage, and development patterns in the area.
He noted that the rezone proposal encompasses approximately the north 55% of the subject lots
to be rezoned from RS-7 Residential Single Family to RMD Residential Medium Density. A
row of RS-7 property is proposed to remain along Highland Avenue between the property
proposed for rezone and existing single family development south of Highland Avenue. Both
Park Avenue and Porter Street are arterials where the infrastructure can support the rezone to
Residential Medium Density. Density issues were discussed with regard to RMD zoning.
Commissioner Kalish stated that she is very familiar with the historic drainage issues in
the area and feels that the City has neglected dealing with issues. She would vote against the
rezone for that reason.
Steve Zenovic acknowledged that there are drainage issues in the area but did not believe
that one developer or property owner should be penalized or made to suffer due to historic issues
in the area. The City is trying to correct the problems but they are long standing and far
reaching. A rezone of the property will not result in increased drainage. Any development on
the site will be required to address indiyidual drainage issues. Single family residential
development will not be required to address drainage issues in the same manner that a multiple
family developer would.
Loran Olsen, 1132 Highland Avenue, submitted maps and a letter from which he read to
the Commission his concerns regarding the rezone proposal. Mr. Ralston approached him as a
neighborhood representative several months previous in order to outline his plan to rezone the
property in order to provide the neighborhood with advanced notice of the proposal. The
neighborhood had been discussing the proposal as a group for several weeks.
Mr. Olsen's main issue was the revelation that the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
designation for the site indicates High Density Residential rather than Medium Density
Residential for the property. He asked that the underlying Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
designation be reversed to Medium Density Residential, which it had been designated prior to
2003, prior to any further consideration of the proposed rezone to Residential Medium Density.
He and his neighbors do not want college dormitories to be developed on the site and they are
concerned that, given the proximity to the college, that will be the case if the site is rezoned.
The existing single family residential dwelling units owned by Mr. Ralston on Porter Street are
rented by college students who are disruptive at times.
121
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8, 2006
Page 3
.
Stornl drainage in the area is overwhelming and needs to be adequately addressed
immediately. He asked that the City give prompt and serious attention to the issues of reversing
the Medium Density Comprehensive Plan land use designation of the site before further
considering the rezone proposal.
Penny Miller, 1130 E. Park Avenue realized that the topic of discussion cannot be
whether dormitories will be built on the property if rezoned, but must only dwell on those uses
that can be included in the RHD zone. However, since Mr. Ralston previously discussed
potential uses of the site with neighbors, she felt it was a safe assumption that he may plan to
construct dormitories on his property if rezoned. She noted that she ~ubmitted a letter in
opposition to the rezone during the written public comment period that was included in staffs
report.
Sam Tikka, 1119 and 1123 East Park Avenue understood that he could not specifically
testify as to the proposed development of the site as dormitories because specific development is
not the issue that is before the Commission. Nevertheless, he wished to say that he objects to
dormitories in the area and would like to see the development of the property as single family
residential only, Multiple family use of the property is not desired as it would result in lighting
impacts and an increase in drainage issues to the area.
Julie Smith, 1107 East Park Avenue is not opposed to development but is very
concerned about drainage issues in the area and traffic on Park Avenue, which is critical. Speed
is a real concern that no one seems able to address and additional development will make matters
worse.
Loretta Commett, 1117 Grant Avenue, was against the proposed zoning as it would
bring an undesirable change to the area.
.
1.
Adrian Hoban, 1110 Grant Avenue, was against the proposed rezoning as it would bring
a radical change to the established neighborhood. Additional lighting, traffic, and increased
stormwater issues are issues of major concern. The site should be single family.
Sam Tikka added that if more people in the neighborhood were notified of the proposal,
even more people would have voiced objection to the proposal.
There being no further testimony, Chair Rasmussen closed the public hearing.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Zenovic identified permitted uses in the
RMD zone.
Jim Mahlum, Civil Engineer for the City of Port Angeles,explained utility
improvements that have recently been made in the area. A storm system was recently installed
on the north side of Park Avenue to accommodate curb, gutter, and sidewalks in the area. The
sewer service was also recently increased in size to handle existing and expected development in
the area and south of the location. Drainage is an issue and the City is dealing with the problems
as quickly as possible.
Scott Johns clarified that the RMD zone does not permit dormitories but does permit
single family residential and multiple family residential as well as group home uses.
Development requirements in the RMD zone require a developer to adequately address lighting,
ingress/egress, parking lot screening, and landscaping issues. A single family development
would not be required to specifically address such improvements.
.
122
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8, 2006
Page 4
In response to a question from Commissioner Kalish, Mr. Olsen responded that
stormwater in the area drains west on Highland Avenue to a point on an abutting property and
then disappears to a point near Race Street. Stormwater also free flows west from this site to
Race Street underground.
Commissioner Kalish repeated that she has no issues with the potential zoning of the
property as proposed, but remains opposed to the rezone due to stormwater issues that remain
unaddressed by the City although she agreed that the existing problems should not be the burden
of a single developer. The City needs to deal with these issues.
Commissioner Kidd was adamant that the integrity of the single family neighborhood
should be retained and questioned the indeterminate boundary that is identified on the City's
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map for the site.
Chair Rasmussen reminded members that the applicant has met the tests necessary to
apply for the rezone and that the proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Map designation for the site and the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan document
by which development is to be guided throughout the City. He stressed that the Commission
cannot consider the rezoning proposal for a specific use, such as a dormitory, but must consider
the rezone on the merits of the existing land use designation and guiding City plans. A
designation of RMD for the site would allow up to 12 units per acre or a potential of 23 units
where the current RS-7 zone allows for up to 22 units, given the platting of the lots and the
ability for each lot to potentially contain an accessory residential structure.
In response to Commissioner Kalish, Mr. Olsen noted that nursing homes are permitted
in the RMD.
Commissioner Snyder discussed the difference between the Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Map designation ofHDR and the Zoning Ordinance classification ofRMD.
Commissioner Kidd again questioned the intent of the High Density Residential
Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation of the site.
Commissioner Snyder agreed that the applicant has met the tests for a rezone.
Development of the site. Development of the site will require that improvements be made to the
property that will address many of the neighbors' concerns. He therefore moved to recommend
approval of the rezone as proposed to RMD citing the following imdings and conclusions:
Findings:
1. On December 29,2005, John Ralston submitted a request to rezone approximately 1.86
acres from Residential Single Family RS-7 to Residential Medium Density.
2. The City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is intended as the guiding document in
establishing a conceptual framework for land use decisions.
3.
The location supports several other multi-family developments and is found opposite the
main BP A power substation and near Peninsula College. Medium density housing
should be located where a higher concentration of residents is compatible with existing
development.
123
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8. 2006
Page5
.
4. The proposed zoning would create a buffer between the BP A substation and the existing
residential zoning.
5. The property is described as Lots I through 4 Block 1 Highland View Tracts and is
situated in the southwest comer of Park Avenue and Porter Streets.
6. The subject site is currently undeveloped.
7. The purpose of the RMD zone (pAMC 17.14.010) is "to provide for a mix of single-
family, duplexes, and apartments at a density greater than single-family neighborhoods
but less than the higher densities of the RHD zone. Commercial uses are not considered '
to be compatible. Few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and then only
conditionally, because of land use impacts associated with nonresidential uses. This
zone provides for a variety in the urban land use pattern for the City's lower density
multi-family residential neighborhoods (at twice the density of the City's basic single
family residential neighborhoods) with direct access on an arterial street, usually located
in outlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable land, and serving as a transitional
use between low density residential uses and commercial/industrial uses."
8.
Residential development in the RMD zone may develop on lots 7,000 sq. ft. in size with
maximum lot coverage of 30%. The density shall not exceed two dwelling units for the
first 7,000 sq. ft. plus one dwelling unit for each additional 3,500 sq. ft. up to a maximum
of 12.44 dwelling units per acre. Residential development in the RS-7 zone requires a
minimum lot area of 7,000 square feet for each unit and maximum lot coverage of 30%.
The RS-7 zone allows for develop up to 6.22 Dwelling units per acre.
.
9. A rezone proposal cannot be considered a spot zone ifit meets the following tests: 1) the
parcel of land has not been singled out for special and privileged treatment; 2) the
singling out is in the public interest and not only for the benefit of the land owner; and 3)
the action is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.
10. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates properties in the area as being
located along an imprecise margin between Residential High Density and Residential
Low Density. An imprecise margin is designated to allow expansion of a particular
designation in specific instances on an individual basis.
11.
The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed in its entirety with respect to the proposal. The
following elements, goals, and policies were found to be most relevant to the proposal:
Growth Management Element Goal A, and Policies A.l (a); Land Use Map Goal A and
Policy A.I, 2; Land Use Element Residential Goals A and Policy A.l, A.2 and Objective
1; Goal B, and C, Policy C.l, C.2, C.3, C.4; Transportation Element Goal A and Policy
A.3; goal B, and Policy B.14, and Objective B.1.
.
124
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8. 2006
Page 6
12.
The City's inventory of land zoned for low density (RS-7 & RS-9) is approximately
2,045 acres or 38.7%. The inventory of Residential Medium and Residential High
Density (RMD & RED) zoned land is approximately 279 acres or 5.3%. (2003 figures)
Analysis of the buildable land supplies of various zones has shown that there are limited
medium and high-density neighborhood lands remaining undeveloped.
13.
Peninsula College recently removed on campus dormitory space further exacerbating the
i
housing supply.
14.
The public comment and notification period for the Planning Commission meeting ran
from December 29 to January 31, 2006. Twelve comment letters were received from the
public as a result of the public notification process. The main issues of concern were
regarding the safety of pedestrians, mainly students walking to the elementary school,
potential activity of assumed occupants of future development, and local drainage issues.
The letters were included in staffs continued review ofthe proposal.
15.
The SEP A Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance on February
1,2006.
16.
The City's Public Works and Utilities Department did not have any comment on the
rezone proposal. Utilities are presently" available in the area and have recently been
upgraded to support current and future developments in the area. The Fire Department
has no objection to the rezone but notes that if medium density housing includes multi-
family dwellings (tri-plex or larger), sprinkler systems will be required.
17. Future development of the subject property to other than single family residential use will
require specific project review and will include conditions to address issues such as
access, parking, noise, lighting, landscaping, and environmentally sensitive review.
18. Section 17.96.100 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code identifies procedures for
amendment to (rezone) the City's Zoning Map.
Conclusions:
1. The proposal is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan andLand Use Map.
2. The site is adjacent to both Park Avenue and Porter Street, both of which are collector
arterials and school walking routes. Future development proposals should anticipate the
necessity to install sidewalks for the provision of safe walking conditions along the
school walking routes.
3.
The site can provide a logical transition between land uses that will not adversely impact
the existing development in the area.
12$
Planning Commission Minutes
FebruarylB. 2006
Page 7
.
4. The rezone is compatible with the surrounding zoning and land uses and will allow
development of the site to a higher density that has been identified as desired for the area
by the City through its Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation.
5. The City's action on rezone application REZ 06-01 is consistent with the established
procedures for amending the Zoning Code set forth in Section 17.96.100, Port Angeles
Municipal Code.
6. Municipal utilities in the area are adequate to supply power, water, communications, and
sewer for multiple family housing development in the area. Ultimate development plans
may require further improvement by the developer. As no adverse impacts to
neighboring streets are anticipated and street, walkway, parking, and drainage will also
be required with subsequent development, the proposed rezone is in the public interest.
7. The proposal will provide additional much needed property for the development of
multiple family housing units, which is in the public interest.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Matthews and was a tie vote with
Commissioners Snyder, Matthews, and Rasmussen voting in favor of the motion, and
Commissioners Kidd, Kalish, and Johnson voting against the motion. Commissioner Kalish
noted that her negative vote was to bring the drainage issue to the City's attention although she .
did not oppose the rezone.
.
126
.
.
.
IC7 FILE
r[fTV.,~1::'_~
~-:t~~:~C:--
FORT,ANGELES
.\ilI_.
- .
.' ........
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
February 8, 2006
: . . ;! I
Plal1nmg ComnusslOn
REZ 06-01
TO:
FROM:
RE:
APPLICANT:
J olm Ralston
O'WNER:
SAME
LOCATION:
Lots 1 - 4, Block 1, Highland View Estates, P01i Angeles, W A,
specifically between Park Avenue and Highland Avenue, west of Porter
Street
REQUEST:
The proposal is to rezone the northern portions of fOUI lots (Lot 1 - 4,
Block 1 of Highland View Tracts, from Residential, Single Family (RS-7)
to Residential, Medium Density (RMD) while leaving the southern
portions of those same lots zoned Residential, Single Family (RS-7).
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Division of the Department of Community and Economic
Development recommends that the Planning Commission forward to the City Council a
recommendation of approval of rezone application REZ 06-01 as proposed, citing the 16
findings and 7 conclusions included in Attachment A. A map of the proposed rezone is
\
attached.
THE PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a rezone from Residential, Single Family (RS-7) to
Residential Medium Density (RMD) over the northern portion of an approximately 3.73
acre site. The area of the proposed rezone is approximately 1.86 acres. The subject property is
legally described as Lots 1 - 4, Block 1, Highland View Tracts. The subject site is located at the
southwest comer of Park Avenue and Porter Street and is composed of lots that are .
approximately 130 feet by 315 feet in size and are currently undeveloped. The application states
that the requested rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan elements and goalE;, and
recomInended long-tenn land use policies.
127
....'i. ,
Departmendfieo'~jiillnil)' & Economic Developmenl SlaffReporl
REZ 06-0] :::'Ralslon\;
'I''''''_'IW..~''''
February S, 2006
Page 2
I
PUBLIC COMMENT:
.
Notification of the proposed action was placed in the Peninsula Daily News on January
16,2006, mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property on January 12,2006,
and posted on the site on January 17,2006. The comment period for this application closed on
January 31, 2006. Twelve written comments were received during the public conmlent period in
opposition to the proposal. The density of development, the prospect of unsupervised college
students residing at the location, storm water drainage, proximity to an elementary school and
rF'<:irlF'l11"i::d r.Rl"P. r.p.ll1"p.r nfl1'p'l11"iRl f()r 1().<:C: ()fllrnnp.l.tv vRhlP' lRC'.k ()f.c:irlp.wRlkc: Rnrl TlF'rlF'dri!'ln
------------- --~-- -------'r-~-----~-- --- ---- --r--r ---.; ----.-;) ---..-- -- ---.- ._~----, -~---~r---~""""'-''''
safety were issues noted.
STAFF ANALYSIS
The application is for a rezone only, which addresses all potential land uses allowed
within that zone, and is not approval for any specific, subsequent development that may be an
allowedlmld use according to the Zoning Code.
The proposed area consists of 81,000 square feet or 1.86 acres. The subject properties are
undeveloped and contain a few scattered trees. The subject property is located at the southwest
comer of Park Avenue and POlier Street. Both Park A venue and Porter Street are classified as
collector mierials and are designated as school walking routes. The site is currently zoned
Residential, Single Fmillly (RS-7).
Adjacent zoning designations include Residential, Medium Density (RMD) to the nOlih
across Park A venue, Residential Single Family (RS-9) to the south across Highland Avenue and .
to the west, and Public Buildings and Parks (PBP) to the east. A single lot, adjacent to the west
is zoned Residential, Single Family (RS-7). Adjacent uses include Crestwood Convalescent
Center to the 1101ih, across Park Avenue, single-family residences to the south and west, and the
Bonneville Power substation to the east with Peninsula College to the east beyond the substation.
Franldin Elementary School is located west of the subject site and north of Parle Avenue. In
recent years, improvements to city infrastmcture in tins neighborhood have been made.
The Comprehensive Plan land use designation of the subject property is Low Density
Residential along the southern portion of the site, while the northerly 14 is located within an
imprecise margin between Low Density Residential to the south and High Density Residential to
the north. The High Density Residential designation extends south into the Park Avenue right-
I
of-way. I
Several previous studies and inventories of lands and Imld uses have shown that there is a
relative shortage of medium density designated areas to low density designated areas within the
City. The most recent land use analysis in Port Angeles was summarized in the Community
Profile Section of the Comprehensive Plan. This section states that there are approximately 36
acres of buildable areas zoned medium density residential multi-fmnily lands, as compared to
approximately 345 acres of buildable areas zoned low density residential (2003 figures). The
low density residential zarllng designations comprise approximately 88% of the total residential
land base within the City limits, as compared to 6.6% of the residential land base being medium
density. Commercial areas comprise approximately 7% of the land base. .
There have been minimal changes in the City's development trends or patterns in the
second half of tile decade of the 1990's. The Clallmn County Housing Needs Assessment (1999) .
indicated that there were 1,878 multi-family rental units in 1998. According to the Washington
State Office of Financial Management, the City's April 2000., official population estimates were
based on 78% single fmillly and 22% multi-family housing units with a declining household size.
128
.
.
.
Department of Community &. Economic Development Staff Report
REZ 06-0] - Ralston
February 8, 2006
Page 3
The trend in single family and multi-family housing percentages in other communities also
indicates increasing needs for muiti-family zoned land. Tllis lOGa] nccd has been exacel"bated by
the recent removal of dormitory space at Peninsula College. Recent housing development trends
have been primarily toward single fan lily residential development.
Examples of permitted uses in the Residential Medium Density zone include single and
multi-family residences, accessory residential units, and duplexes, and conditional uses include
art galleries, assisted living facilities, funeral homes, child care, churches, nursing homes, group
homes, libraries, and public and private schools.
The following tables are included to illustrate allowed densities i11 a val-iety of zones and
to illustrate the potential residential densities in the RS- 7 and RMD zones for the area proposed
for the rezone.
Zone Allowed Density DUlAc
RS-7 6.22
RS-9 4.84
RS-11 3.96
RM:D 12.44
RED 38.56
Any amendment to Title 17 the Zoning Code shall be as follows:
17.96.100 Amendments. '
A.. In determining if an an1endment to these regulations is needed, the City Council'
shall give due consideration to the proper relationship of such amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan and the entire Zoning Regulations; it being the intent to retain the integrity and validity of
the zones herein described and to avoid any isolated spot ZOlling changes in the Zoning Map.
B. Any amendments adopted by the Council may be modified from the form in
which they were advertised within the limits necessary to relate properly such amendment or
amendments to the Zoning Regulations. Final action on such modifications shall be subject to
review and report of the Planning Commission prior to final p~ssage by the City Council.
C. No application for a change of zoning of al1Y lot, parcel or portion thereof shall be
considered by the Council within one year of the fmal action of the Council upon a prior
application covering any of the san1e described land. This provision, however, shall not impair
the right of the Council to propose by their own action any amendment or change in the
boundaries of any of the zones in these regulations.
As required by the Zoning Code, certain criteria are required to be met for the approval of
rezones, which includes consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, consistelicy with the Zoning
Code, including maintaining the validity, integrity and purpose and intent of the zones, as well as
avoiding spot zones.
Given that consistency with the Comprehensive Plal1 can be found, then compliance with
the Zoning Code can be made by the proposal. Since the subject property is abutting a medium
density residential zone, the proposal is not considered to be a spot zone which requires the.
following three tests: 1) a small parcel ofland is singled out for special and privileged treatment;
2) the singling out is not in the public interest but only for the benefit of the land owner; and 3)
the action is not in accordance with the comprehensive plan.
In addition to consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission can
determine that there are circumstances that have changed since the time the present zoning was
approved years ago. Since 1994, a new Comprehensive Plan was adopted designating new land
uses for the subject area and vicinity, and has been amended several times since with the most
129
Department ofComlUunity & Economic Developmenl Staff Report
REZ 06-01 - Ralston
February 8, 2006
Page 4
significant change occurring in 2003 when the area was designated High Density Residential,
from the previous Medium Density Residential designation.
.
DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
The Fire Depmiment indicated that they have no objections to the proposed rezone, but
offered the following comments. If the medium density housing includes multi-family dwellings
(tri-plex or larger), sprinkler systems will be required.
The Public Works and Utilities Department provided no conunents regarding the rezone
Ilnnlicati on.
~ L
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City's State Environmental Policy Act Responsible Official issued a Determination
of Non Significance for the proposal per WAC 197-11-355 on February 1,2006.
There me no environmentally sensitive areas located on or adjacent to the subject
property.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
This rezone application is a legislative action, and an "open record" public hearing
will be held before both the Planning Commission and the City Council. According to
R.C.W. 36.70B, Local Project Review ("The Regulatory Reform Act"), the Planning
Commission shall hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council. . The .
recommendation is to be based solely on the information contained in the official file, which
includes any public testimony that was received.
The proposal is located in the indeterminate boundary between the Comprehensive
Plan map designation of High Density Residential and Low Density Residential and is
therefore consistent with the land use map.
Attachments
A - Reconunended Findings and Conclusions
B - Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code review
C - Application Materials
D - Conllnent Letters
T:\REZ\2006\REZ 06-01 Ralston.doc
.
130
.
.
.
Department ofCommullity 8:. Ecollomic Development Staff Report
REZ 06-0] - Ralston I
February 8,2006
Page 5
_Attachment A
Findings and Conclusions in Support of REZ 06-01 - Ralston
FindinQ:s
1. On December 29,2005, John Ralston submitted a request to rezone approximately 1.86
acres from Residential Single Family RS-7 to Residential Medium Density.
2. The City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is intended as the guiding document ill
establishing a conceptual framework for land use decisions.
3. The location supports several other multi-family developments and is found opposite the
main BP A power substation and near Peninsula College. Medium density housing
should be located where a higher concentration of residents is compatible with existiDg
development
4. The proposed zorring would create a buffer between the BP A substation and the existing
residential zoning.
5. The property is described as Lots 1 through 4 Block 1 Highland View Tracts and is
situated in the southwest corner of Park Avenue and Porter Streets.
6. The subject site is currently undeveloped.
7. The purpose of the RMD zone (FAMe 17.14.010) is "to provide for a mix ofsingle-
family, duplexes, and apartments at a density greater than single-family neighborhoods
but less than the higher densities of the RED zone. Commercial uses are not considered
to be compatible. Few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and then only
conditionally, because of land use impacts associated with nonresidential uses. This zone
provides for a variety in the urban land use pattern for the Cit:ls lower density multi-
family residential neighborhoods (at twice the density of the City's basic single family
residential neighborhoods) with direct access on an arterial street, usually located in
outlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable land, and serving as a transitional
use betvveen low densitY residential uses and commercial/industrial uses. 11
8. Residential development in the R.MD zone may develop on lots 7,000 sq. ft. in size with
maximum lot coverage of 30%. The density shall not exceed two dwelling units for the
first},OOO sq. ft. plus one dwelling unit for each additional 3,500 sq. ft. up to a maximum
of 12.44 dwelling unitsper acre. Residential development in the RS-7 zone requires a
minimmn lot area of 7,000 square feet for each unit and maximum lot coverage of 30%.
The RS-7 zone allows for develop up to 6.22 Dwelling units per acre.
9. A rezone proposal Calmot be considered a spot zone if it meets the following tests: 1) the
parcel ofland has not been singled out for special and privileged treatment; 2) the
singling out is in the public interest alld not only for the benefit of the land owner; and 3)
the action is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.
10. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates properties in the area as being
located along an imprecise margin between Residential High Density and Residential
Low Density. An imprecise margin is designated to allow expansion of a particular
designation in specific instances on arJ individual basis.
11. The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed in its entirety with respect to the proposaL The
. following elements, goals, arJd policie1'31e found to be most relevant to the proposal: .
Department of Community & Economic Development Staff Report
REZ 06-0 I - Ralston
Febmary 8,2006
Page 6
Growth Management Element Goal A, and Policies A.I (a); Land Use Map Goal A and
Policy AI, 2; Land Use Element Residential Goals A and Policy Al, A.2 and Objective .
1; Goal B, and C, Policy C.1, C.2, C.3, C.4; Transportation Element Goal A and Policy
A.3; goal B, and Policy B.14, and Objective B.1.
12. The City's inventory ofland zoned for low density (RS-7 & RS-9) is approximately
2,045 acres or 38.7%. The inventory of Residential Medium and Residential High
Density (RMD & RHD) zoned land is approximately 279 acres or 5.3%. (2003 figures)
Analysis of the buildable land supplies of various zones has shown that there are limited
medium and high-density neighborhood lands remaining undeveloped.
13. Peninsula College recently removed on campus dormitory space further exacerbating the
housing supply.
14. The public conmlent and notification period for the Planning Commission meeting ran
from December 29 to January 31, 2006. Twelve COlllillent letters were recei ved from the
public as a result of the public notification process. The main issues of concern were
regarding the safety of pedestrians, mainly students walking to the elementary school,
potential activity of assumed occupants of future development, and local drainage issues.
The letters were included in staff s continued review of the proposal.
15. The SEP A Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance on February
1,2006.
16. The City's Public Works and Utilities Depmtment did not have any comment on the
rezone proposal. Utilities are presently available in the area and have recently been
upgraded to support cllnent and future developments in the area. The Fire Department .
has no objection to the rezone but notes that if medium density housing includes multi-
family dwellings (tri-plex or larger), sprinlder systems will be required.
17. Future development of the subject property to other than single family residential use will
require specific project review and will include conditions to address issues such as
access, parking, noise, lighting, landscaping, and environmentally sensitive review.
18. Section 17.96.100 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code identifies procedures for
amendment to (rezone) the City's Zoning Map.
Conclusions:
1.
2.
The proposal is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map.
The site is adjacent to both Park Avenue and Porter Street, both of which are collector
arterials and school walking routes. Future development proposals should anticipate the
necessity to install sidewalks for the provision of safe wallcing conditions along the
school wallcing routes.
The site can provide a logical transition between land uses that wip not adversely impact
the existing development in'the area.
The rezone is compatible with the sun-oooding zoning and land uses and will allow
development of the site to a higher density that has been identified as desired for the area
by the City through its Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation.
The City's action on rezone application REZ 06-01 is consistent with the established
procedures for amending the Zoning Code set forth in Section 17.96.1 00, Port Angeles
Municipal Code,
.
"
.J.
4.
5.
132
.
.
.
Depanmenl of Communii)' & Economic Development Staff Report
REZ 06-0] - Ralston
February g, 2006
Page 7
6.
Municipal utilities in the area are adequate to suppl:,\" power, water, cOllli11Unicatiolls, and
sewer for multiple family housing development in the area. Ultimate development plans
may require fmiher improvement by the developer. As no adverse impacts to
neighboring streets are anticipated and street, walkway, parking, and drainage will also
be required with subsequent development, the proposed rezone is in the public interest.
The proposal will provide additional much needed propeliy for the developlnent of
multiple family housing units, which is in the public interest.
7.
133
ATTACHMENT B
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING REVIE'"
Comprehensive Plan.
.
V. LAND USE ELEMENT POLICIES
Medium Density Residential (Up to 13 Units per Acre)
The primary intent of this designation is for the development of multiple residential unit
projects including but not limited to duplexes, townhouses, condominiums, apartments, and
planned residential developments at a density up to 13 units per acre.
Goal A: - "To guide current and future development within the City in a mamler that
provides certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to
meet the challenges and opportunities of the future".
Policy A.1 - "The Comprehensive Plan Land use map should be used as a
conceptual guide for determining CLUTent and long range zoning and other land
use decisions. The map's land use designations are intended to show areas where
general land use types are allowed. The area between land use designations
should be considered an imprecise margin in order to provide flexibility in
detennining the boundary of such areas. When determining appropriate zoning
designations for an area near a margin, the goals, policies and objectives of the
Land Use Element should take precedence".
Policy A.2. - "All land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council
and/or any of its appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and its land use map".
.
Goal A, Objective No. 1. - "The City will review andl:evise as necessary the existing
Zoning Ordinance, Zoning Map, and other development regulations to ensure consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan".
Goal B - "To have a community where residential development and use of the land are
done in a mamler that is compatible with the environment, the characteristics of the use
and the users, and the desired urban design of the City",
Goal C - "To have a comrnLmity of viable districts and neighborhoods with a variety of
residential oPPOlilinities for personal interaction, fulfillment and enjoyment, attractive to
people of all ages, characteristics and interests".
Policy c.1. "Residential land should be developed on the district and
neighborhood concept. Although such districts may be composed primarily of
residential uses of a uniform density, .a healthy, viable district should be
composed of residential uses of varying densities, which may be augmented, by
subordinate arld compatible uses. Single family and multi-family homes, parks
and open-spaces, schools, churches, day care and residential services, home
occupations, arld district shopping areas are all legitimate components of district
.
134
Department of Community &. Economic Development SlaffReport
REZ 06-01 - Ralston '
February g, 2006
Page 9
.
development and enhancement. A neighborhood should be primarily composed
of low, medium, or high-density housing".
Policy C.2. "Medium and high density housing should be located in areas of the
community most suitable for such uses, based 011 existing services, public
facilities, and transpOl1ation ".
Policy C.3. "Medium and high-density housing should be served by a11erial
streets of sufficient size in order to satisfy traffic demand and to lessen
neighborhood traffic congestion'l,
Policy CA. "Medium and high density housing could be a transitional use
between different land uses, provided such other uses would not adversely impact
the residential nature of the housing".
VI. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT POLICIES
Goal A. "To develop a coordinated, multimodal transpOl1ation system, which serves all
areas of the city and all types of users in a safe, economical, and efficient manner".
Policy A.3. _ "The collector arterial streets and local access streets should serve
primarily local traffic with special emphasis on safety for pedestrian traffic":
.
Goal B. "To improve circulation patterns across and within the community, and to
achieve the desired urban design of the City",
Policy B. 14 _ "Off-street parking should be sufficient and accessible within
business and residential areas to ensure that the traffic flow of the street is 110t
impaired" .
Goal B, Objective No.1 - "Secondary and primary arterials will be designed with
an appropriate balance for moving tJn'ough traffic and providing local access to
uses that front on these arterials. In commercially zoned areas, policies for
consolidating "access and providing for joint access and maintenance of chiveways
would be considered". .
.
In review of the above applicable policies as they relate to the proposal, we offer the
following COlmnents:
The adopted Comprehensive Plan goals and policies encourage a variety of residential
opportunities and densities within a community of viable districts and neighborhoods, creating
the desired urban design of the City where housing is available and affordable. Medium density
housing should be located where a higher density concentration ofresidents is compatible with
tIle surrounding area. Rezoning the subject area to Residential, Medium Density will slightly'
expand the existing Residential Medium Density zone that exists inmlediately 11011h of the site
andsuppOli the concept of a viable residential district composed of a variety of uses and
residential densities. The site is bounded on two sides by collector alierial streets that serve local
traffic uses. The expansion of the medium density area would act as a buffer between the
existing electric substation and the single-family residential areas to the west. The
135
Department of Community &. Economic Development Staff Report
REZ 06-0] - Ralston
February 8, 2006
Page] 0
Comprehensive Plmlnotes that medium m1d high densities could be a transitional use between
different land uses. This is often found between single family and commercial or industrial land
uses. Medium density residential uses will also suppOli the needs of Peninsula College located
east of the substation.
Local concerns for traffic pedestrim1 conflicts can be mitigated as future development on
the site occurs. Sidewalks should be required along the property frontages ofthe school walking
routes, Park A venue and Porter Street.
No enviromnentally sensitive areas are lmown to exist in the area.
.
Zoning Code
The purpose of the Zoning Code is to implement the goals, policies and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan by dividing the City into zones restricting and regulating the location,
construction, alteration of the use of structures and land, and to promote the orderly and
appropriate development of such areas.
RMD (P AMC 17.14) The purpose of the RMD zone is to provide for a mix of single-
family, duplexes, and apmiments at a density greater than single-family neighborhoods but less
than the higher densities of the RED zone. COlllillercial uses are not considered to be
compatible. Few nomesidential uses are allowed in this zone and then only conditionally,
because of land use impacts associated with nomesidential uses. This zone provides for a variety
in the urban land use pattern for the City's lower density multi-family residential neighborhoods
(at twice the density ofthe City's basic single family residential neighborhoods) with direct
access on an arterial street, usually located in outlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable
land, and serving as a transitional use between low density residential uses and
commercial/industrial uses.
.
T:\REZ\2006\REZ 06-0] Ralston.doc
.
136
......_._~,~..',J:. .'"
..is _~:=S~7: 0 ~,/-~ E Z- c::) & ....c!:'
Fee: 'S<"1-5-Er-&Se a (~
I~r:~ ;~~~~I[D)I
r ,....,..,...\/,.....,,..... .'- ___.... ~ ____, I. i
/,._Dept. of Communi1\l Develop::m '
i i
I
ATTACHl\1ENT C
;' '::. ...",-",. '--..
. "".' .~..." ~
CITY CY~~1i;B:)O,R:r"::A1\r GELES
Rei~~~~":'~~p!;l~~ation
., '
PLEASE READALLD\7STRUCTJONSBEFORE C01\IPLETING THIS FOILM
1. (A) A:PPLICjJ'~T Jilh... ~.!" c;t.<11 T. \L, \.t,,~
8~
Address V. D. ~t>"'I ~ ?'t:>~'1- ~.P l-tl... W A '1 B3. (p-z...
(B) PROPERTY OVi71<1ER (if other thal1 applicant)
Property OViTJler' s Address (if other thanappliC31.1t)
Daytime Phone 42- 8a.IS
Phone
Daytime Phone
t.~t:.'1I'- ..
phone a...ll-b Sb I
1. (Al 'Legal Description of Subj eet Property L b +s 1- 4 , 'b\ belL \. t \+\""; Ul......J \l ,-:" u.J Ty..~.-k
(B) General Location of Subj ect Property ;p A..... "- St-. e. ~t>V+-..... S+.-..._d
..,
;).
Size of Subject Property
sq.ft.
blocks -;. ,5:
aCTes~-
4. Zoning of Subject Property \2.&-1 ProposedZorringDesignation \2.S'-'l \ -1.L..~+1-
5. CharacleriJrticsof SubjectProperty (how iB it develop Ed) 1- ~e "'''''^''' ." "'''' i-. "'''''D - \.4 "'- i1_
fXv .::;; ~ k ~ ~ iJ.A.'" l.v..&w lSo t..l~t!l".uA!'\ ",,.,J
7, 1
6. Characteristics of Surrounding Area (what uses aTe around the property) .; I ~\o(. c.. 1M ~
I~A"'.LA~j ~ '\lJl!"=-+- !-::.o<.)-\:I... J V4.CD<..l:"c'""1..t.<....Ai ~ C~h-hr.~Ood kL~ ;.... ~.) ~"-"l,..~u.oC- s.u\..c.:-k-h~+t. ei/s:1
7. Comprehensive Plan Designation of Property w....,..I\U,.... ~!:.,L P.._ LM.v,-h...\J low P.eu J .J)
, "I . \"1 :!:f~~lcilgJ.l.~""'~
8. Comprehensive Plan Designation of Surrounding Properties lAA:bIL-I-o ~ l.L... U) Q... ~ €:. ~ ,-l-.'
, ,?.bP {.o .pC(..> 1 . '\) .:> ~ \.(J~., :>
9. Applicable COI?-prehensivB Plan policies
137
0'1 _ . .. UOi ~: ~ 2 U :05 ~ lUJ
- 10, JUSIIF1CATION FOR20N:D'JG C:FiAl.;i!Br'~~~~',;:~~g~~;Jli;;;:""d -. I
. .' .... .... '; CITY OF r-11;:;' I kl\lGELES !
(A) Relationship to Comprehensive Plan'; q~V'D~".i~ 1(,. c~,' '-I to k, ,DepLof11ommurWv DevelQprneld ,l
'. -'L" . ,",-,:~1(,".."';.:;':.,,:_ \
9\C-tVc. .at.lJ.i.eM,t.:" Ci,v-il 0:'~\.!. ~ ~::~~~&A tw-.c;, ~\A'\ \~~A, v~ ~b\l'U-.<" ~
(B) S11itability of Property for I1roposed 2onulg"~ '\ -k a.c.u-;:.t;..el': ,..t \ ~+t'f 4..., Glf vi
c:tvA-e,';:",\.. s.~AJ ~ ~ tv.. c1t>!..L ~1''''()~'Ull~ {.., ~""\.\1'-\1\)\.c. c'.,.,1\-:::9PJ <5l.\d \A,,~ ?\""l:i,?'Os..cd
A~Ll.J.l')~\,tHA.lT-\-e\~l.1 1>.IUJ" \c.,v -k C<.,l~""c..b-t+- fV\?f-'l1"",'>. +0 Vol c.;fL
(C) Change:in Circumstances Smce Original Z01ll11g N. /!Y\f],
(D) Inappropriateness of ClUTent Zon:ing :tc...... c.. M ?,-t-- Q L\ DIU L ~" +- u i.I!: ",,--P- \ Ct '" lr
v.....6.ev Cc..w..pv-ek.Il\.Lc;.\<Y... P!UIII f~\ LC t~ J
11,
I CERTIFY that all of me above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and ackllowledcre that
,;vilful misrepresentation of information will immediately terrrrinate this application. . ;:,
~m~
C / SIGNATURE
Date
.
.
crTY OPPORT ANGELES, Planning Department, 321 EastFijih Street, P.J.3iJl50, PortAllgeles, WA 98362 (360) 411-4750
.
------r-----
.....
I
CURRENT ZONINa - RS-9
I
r--
~
-1_
w
'<)
------
---l
AREA TO SE OEDlCA TED TO
THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
FOR ROAD ANO Ul1L1TY PURPOSES
(10955 Sri)
CURRENT ZONING - RS-9
Scale: 1" = 100'
o 100' 200' 300'
I I I I
.
I
I
i !
I i
I
I
I
.
l'J
In ~~o ti
" %
~ ~Ol 0 tJ
'" t=i~rL...~
'"
" z )- ~~ 2
'" 8gs!e
>- 0 ~l:!~:~
~
l1. E= ~~ ..g ~
r-: -< viJ-~::? ;!
'" P21!i:c ~ 0[
... 0:: 1I1D-Q. L.. ~
~ ::=>
on [/J
'" 0 W
ll:: G: E-
'" cCl -< 0
l1. Z
I!! u -~
0 - u <
u u :>- 0 is
'"
I!: o [/J ..
;0, w Z[/J~
~ Z w -< ~
0 N
0 N
" W
:s
G 0::
:t 0
..: W
0 (fJ '"
0 '"
0 '" .,
..., 0... 8 lO
'" '"
.. 0 ':l
1 cr.:: '< ~
- 0... It
MAP ~ u... :=! lIi
VICINITY 13 '<lO!U
0 ~~~
~ ::r:: ~><'"
!U U -.:0'<
" r- "'10....
0 r05
!;j W ~a.:Q
<>: :oG
"
w (fJ ffi
'" :J
" u
sr;ALE:
CURRENT ZONING - PBP
I
I
I
PROJECT INFORMATION
OWNER/APPLlCAIH:
JOHN M, AND GAIL T, RALSTON
P,O, BOX B9B
PORT ANGELES. WA 96362
PROPOSED REZONE FROM RS-7 TO RIAO
PROJECT SITE (CURRENT) - RS-7
PROJECT SITE (PROPOSED) - RS-7 AND RIAO
ADJOINING PROPERl1ES-
NORTH - RMO
EAST - PBP
SOUTH - RS-9
WEST - RS-7
POWER - PORT ANGELES CITY LIGHT
SANITARY SEWER AIm WATER - CITY OJ' PORT ANGELES
TELEPHONE - OWEST COMMUNICA nONS
CABLE TELEVISION - IlORTHLAUO CABLEVlSION
06-30-14-560100
I
AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO
CURRENT 20NING - RMO f THE CITY OF PORT A1~GELES 1
FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES
- - - - - - - - - -'--- - - (3S25 SF,jo)
-------------- ------- .
---__ PNlK~J"",,1 __ ----- !
----------r---...t-
:'77.-,'7. .......... .-.,. _'. ._
~...<L4='/~~/.7.-:;:'../.. ..............z.......~.7...././. . /...':,'7. . 'i." '../ ",'7'7. '/ .-
.( x >' ....,/'-.;;<.>7~. 7~.~ )~';>'v~"7~")<.; ,>~. .', .~. /~-7"'~;' " r _~_ .
:%~Q;>~~; y><0~::(;)~~~~<3~<,~<~~<-:)q,~;'(.,6~;:::((">~><>Q?g~~ I I
. .'.....'...... X.v"."" ~,cftl;)">''''''''' .. (.x:::,N..>\.~..,j) xx
.({>{>5~X>l~>X5'V.><~)>IJJ;,~R~~{;1~~)t>--23i~:x;6>~~x ~?$~)~ :>;::,:4iO{~)~:)~
< >>v\'\.'\.,' . v, "-OSEO.'i0li~C'-(~..,'>. x" ", ,,' > >/ J' ' )'. ~~". ..,)'v"'"
<'>'x" ",/'" . 'X"'" ~U~" Y. "><.. y x>,. V. '-..,') ), y" >.;: ).j ," /,')(' "',
_\~,;rbr~~~~&~;"<:~g'~Q~~;~(~?~~"\{jJ:)~~8>>i~~:?~';X.~ '9\~i
IY{I~~,f>K' '>:'\>:;,A'21Jg&.8925f;>Y;';-:; /,/ "Y'>l'>:X>~>'" })y'9XY.)( 1
" Q-Q,,<.,;<,>0X" 'x.~:)',' Yo Y6 '~)> X('XY><Y,<X' '( ,>' :OPil.Y )))
.ss::~~~?:g~t~'9,~~~~~i~~~~~~)3 '~~~\23~11
" . ""-1" "A'....... v)()( ,>c/','vY.,. ''x'>~~' /,' ,.'>() I
, I LOT 3 I
. , t"1Q.3'.r\I.~1
lOT 3-C lOT 2-9 lOT 2-C 7DIlI". .
LOT 4-C I LOT 3-B 7135 SH /7.35 SF,jo 7135 SF,jo I- .7' I
1050 SF::!: 7135 SF:f: . _ _ ~
, 1
_ CURRENT ZONING - RS-1 (TO REMAIN) ". ~v~"I .)1
~//';:::.o I J
.- /..:.//~.... .. .-,' ~. -
~W%~;F~fff$$J.Uf*ir#li:ff%tff41
It!ltl.AIlo A YEIlUE
PROPOSED PROJECT:
ZOI~"~G,
ununES:
PARCEL NO,:
NOTED
MTE'
DECEMBER 2005
FILE:
""'". IlAlS"'"1V'G"1
~mI-I,DWC
JOB NO:
05J6D
SBEET
1
OF
.
.
.
140
.
THOMAS R. and MARGARET J. DEENEY
P. o. BOX 1422
PORT ANGELES, WA 98362
PH 360-452-9666 ATT A CHl\1ENT D
January 29, 20006
[ffi lE~ ~ W lE ~
JAN 3 0 2006
City ofPort Angeles
Planning Office and Planning Commission
Port Angeles, WA 98362
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Dept. of Community Development
RE: Ralston rezone request at Southwest comer of Park /porter Street.
Dear Sirs:
This property already has a single-family house in the middle of the area requested to be rezoned to Residential Medium Density. In
addition there is a single-famil)l dwelling, RS9, abuts the parcel on the West and a single family dwelling, RS7 abuts the parcel on the
Southwest. .A11 of the land Mr. Ralston is requesting to be rezoned to RMD is now RS7. This is the only RS7 land within several
blocks.
At the several neighborhood meeting I attended on this matter, one of the most frequently raised objections was the fact that apartments
on this land will attract mostly stndents. Vlhen there is a concentration of unsupervised young stndents, there will be trouble. It will
come in tbe form of alcohol, drug and noise and not be under control of Peninsula College. Mr. Ralston has rented the two sinO"le-
_. y dwellings to stnd.ents for ilie last y"" and we oo've witnes"d loud music lllte at night and have seen 1l>e police cars at O:e house
than once. We do not know !he crime involved, but it should be a matter of record available to the City. This is from 6-8
dents. Try to imagine 52 or more stndents in this neighborhoo~ and the problems that will occur.
Since the college closed their dormitories, they have assisted students find housing throughout the city. Barbara Martin, Vice President
of Administrative Services of Peninsula College informed us that they have had no problem finding housing for students. Presently
this housing does not cause a concentration of students in one area where trouble can start.
The neighborhood atmosphere created by a concentration of unsupervised students is not compatible with our neighborhood
comprising single-family dwellings, Laurel Park Assisted Living, Franklin Elementary School and Bonneville Power Administration
power station. If apartments are built on RMD land, please consider the sitnation of a much higher concentration of unsupervised
students on the quality of life in the neighborhood and the increased burden on our police department.
Drainage is another ongoing problem in this area. The more buildings and parking lots that are built, the more runoff and water
problems we will have. Most ofMr: Ralston's land drains to the South and eventually drains west through private yards. This is a
poor situation at best and needs to be dealt with before it is compounded with increased runoff. This area will not withstand much
more water without causing flooding. The City has worked with us for several years on drainage problems in our neighborhood. They
are very aware of the situation. The City has recently exp_erienced problems when Park Ave. was widened and paved. The pavement
is still sinking after three repairs to the new pavement. It is our understanding this is due to ground water saturating the soils.
~erelY, /l . .
'-i A%r/f:j!!$fJy711pt::!. r~-~Y/
Thomas R. Deeney Margaret J. Deeney
.
141
,~ ~_~jJ. ~ ~\D)
\ n r ,.
\ "~ 2 7 200D J
ANGELES
. ~ f'ITY Of PORT" Development
D~Pt. 01 CommunI, :..-
Penny Miller,
Mailing address: PO Box 442
Port Angeles, W A 98362
Tel# (360) 452-2983
.
January 27, 2006
City of Port Angeles
Attn: Port Angeles Planning Commission
32 I E. Fifth St.
Port Angeles, W A 98362
Hand Delivered to Port Angeles
City Hall, Permit Counter
RE: Rezone application for: Applicant: John Rabton
Location: Southwest corner of Park and Porter StTeets, between Park A venue
and Highland Avenue.
Dear Gentlepeople:
I own and reside at 1130 E. Park A venue in Port Angeles on the property directly adjacent to the lots
referenced above. As you know, Mr. Ralston has requested that a portion of this property be rezoned from
RS-7 Residential Single Family to RMD Residential Medium Density. He has requested that he be allowed
to subdivide the balance of the property.
I have concerns over the potential rezoning of this property to RMD and request that you accept this
correspondence as my written opposition to the rezoning request from RS-7 to RMD. I have always
anticipated that the open fields adjacent to my property would be developed at some point in the future and
support Mr. Ralston's right to do what he likes with the land as long as it is not a detriment to the local
community. I do not oppose his request to subdivide the currently zoned RS-7 single-family residential
building sites to allo~ construction of more single-family dwellings on the properties in question. I feel the
RS-7 zoning remains the best density allowance for the surrounding neighborhood.
.
It is my understanding that Mr. Ralston is requesting the rezoning to RMD with the intent of construction
of apartment buildings. It is inevitable that if you build apartments one block from Peninsula Community
College, a large percentage of the tenants will be students.
I recently joined two neighboring landowners to meet with Barbara Martin, Vice President of
Administrative Services of Peninsula College. We discussed the rezoning request and Peninsula Colleges'
student housing situation given the recent demolition of the donnitory units on campus. Ms. Martin said
the college would not be making a statement either for or against this rezoning request. She was able to
confirm the following information: The college has no knowledge ofreduced enrollment as a result ofthe
removal of the dormitories. The college provides a Housing Officer to assist in locating affordable housing
and the current student population is scattered throughout the City of Port Angeles. The college has been
able to find adequate housing for the students req~esting this service. "
Allowing the rezoning ofthe property referenced above to medium density with the bllilding of apartments
as the owner intends, will result in transition of the population of college students residing in housing
distributed throughout the city to students residing together in one small area. CUTI'ently issues involving
alcohol, drug and crime related activities that have a tendency to occur in college student populations is
distributed throughout the community with the student residency scattered as it is. If you build apartments
on this street, you are going to bring that population together and the problems are going to explode into the
surrounding neighborhood.
.
142
.
.
.
You also have Laurel Park Assisted Living across the street and Franklin Elementary School a few blocks
down on the comer of Park A venue and Washington Street. A large influx of college students living across
the street wil1make poor neighbors for both the grade school children and the elderly tenants of the assisted
living facility.
I ask the Planning COlmnission to give serious consideration to the challenges the City will face with
medium density col1ege housing without onsite supervision as was provided in the on-campus dormitory
housing.
The other concem I have for this proposed rezoning is the traffic that the increased population will create.
Park Avenue currently has significant n'affic problems with the High School students speeding down the
street to the college to attend classes. There have been numerous accidents at the comer of Park and Race
due to this trai'fic flow crossing Race St. Increasing this property to medium density is gOilig to result in a
greater amount of traffic on what is already a problematic traffic corridor.
I have reviewed the City of Port Angeles' Comprehensive Plan and understand the need for additional
housing opportunities in the city. I am an active volunteer with Habitat for Humanity and have just
finished serving six years on the Board of Directors withOUT local affiliate. I am continuing with my
support of efforts for affordable housing in Clallam County; and will be anonsite volunteer with Habitat
for Humanity when we begin building OUT neh'! homes on Campbell Street in Port Angeles. I provide this
information so that you will understand that this is not just a situation where I do not want the increased
housing this City requires, in my back yard. I truly feel that if the rezoning is allowed and apartment
buildings are built on the property in question you are going to abruptly change the quiet safety of our little
neighborhood into "party central". I have a friend whose son attends Spokane Community College and he
lives in apartment housing a block away from the college. He is a normal young person who loves to
celebrate life with his friends but even he notes that the amount of partying that goes on in the apartments is
overwhelming; with frequent problems with drugs and alcohol, bomb scares and other crimes. Vlhen asked
why so many people choose to live in that environment, he explains that it is so convenient to walle out
your door and down the block to your classes, that students feel the pros outweigh the cons. Please don't
make the same mistake of creating such an opportimity for condensed, ungoverned student housing in OUT
community.
Thank you for your consideration.
SinC~'
v!i1~W
Penny Miller
ut'l,. 1~-
143
.
.
.
144
.
SAM AND .~TTE T1KKA~~~~~~2:~~ I
. CITY OF PORT ANGEl ~S I
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._..................................................................... ........D..aPL.nf..c.ommlJ.njty..Develo~:;e nl
January 30, 2006
Port Angeles City Planning Office and Planning Commission
321 East Fifth Street
Port Angeles, W A 98362
RE: Rezone application for: Applicant: John and Gail Ralston
Location: Southwest corner of Park and Porter Streets,
between Park Avenue and Highland Avenue
Dear Planning Commissioners: '-
. We submit this letter in opposition to the proposed rezone as referenced above.
.
The rezone fromRS7 to RMD to allow apartment buildings that Ralston is requesting reduces our
property values because of a condensed population of college students living without supervision in three
multiple story buildings all in a roW.
With elderly assisted living across the Park Avenue and a grade school to the west and single family
homes in between and aU around, it seems unreasonable to allow one developer's plan to come before
everyone else in the area.
There are many apartment buildings, duplexes, and open land for further development only three blocks
above our area on Campbell Avenue.
Ralston has already built two buildings for college students on this property without rezoning and they
have vacancies. They at least look like single family homes from a distance.
Looking at the City oHart Angeles Comprehensive Plan it seems like the City is against us also, as the
north side of Park Avenue was rezoned to RMb from RS7 without telling the property owners. That
rezone goes all the way west to Franklin Grade School right through and including established single
family (RS7) homes. This is progress? How unfortunate for us.
. There is a tremendous drainage problem in this area that is common knowledge. With apartment house
parking lots there will be fast surface water runoff to the street and also mixing with subsurface water that
flows mostly northwest, very slowly pooling on the surface in some places.
Traffic from the possible apartments will have to get on to the Park Avenue race track and on down
Liberty Street through Cresthaven residential area or west on Park to the already dangerous Park Avenue
145
and Race Street accident prone intersection.. So who cares? Not the developer, not the City planners, just
all of us residents. Some of us have lived here for 40 years and some of us have children who have made
the neighborhood their home. Although the City ofFort Angeles has a plan and Ralston wants to follow
that plan, the people who live in the area should have the right to keep the quality ofthe neighborhood. A
developer who is looking for a profit on his land should not come before the people who would live next
to the RMD property and suffer the consequences. Why can't single family homes be built and occupied
by people who care.
.
Thank you for your consideration of these matters.
Sincerely, 0
;S:t///l/L "1 {~:;~1 '1'~' 'iWcr.-J
Sam and Annette Tikka
1119 and 1123 East Park Avenue
Port Angeles, W A 98362
360-457-8438
.
.
146
.
.
.
1107 East Park Ave
Port Angeles, Wa 98362
January 29, 2006
I~I~A~ ~O~ 2~~IDJl
I CiTY OF PORT ANGELES I'
M Depi. of Community Development
arle and Julie Snnth I
(360) 452-9852
City of Port Angeles
Attn: Planning Department
321 E Fifth St.
Port Angeles, Wa. 98362
Dear Planning Department,
We are writing in opposition to the proposed rezone on the southwest corner of Park and
porter streets, between Park Avenue and Highland Avenue. The applicants are John and
Gail Ralston. We understand that Mr. and Mrs. Ralston have requested that a portion of
this property to be rezoned from RS-7 Residential Single Family to RMD, Residential
Medium Density and that he be allowed to subdivide the property. Thanks to our
neighbors we were told of this, totally being unaware of this being in the processing
stages.
We are concerned about the rezoning of this property and ask that you would accept this
as a written opposition to the rezoning. We know that with the rising problems of housing
that this area will soon be developed and are comfortable "Vvith this happening under the
RS-7 zoning. This will still allow for development and growth without adding an unsafe
situation as far as traffic problems. My husband and I are very concerned already for the
many elderly, joggers, and children that walk our streets. With being between the
Peninsula College and the Port Angeles High School the traffic has always been a huge
concern. The 25 miles an hour speed limit does not mean much to many people that
travelthis road. With the new addition to the sidewalks this helps somewhat, but the
grade school children are still in jeopardy crossing the busy street every morning and
afternoon. We lost a great portion of our yard when the sidewalks came in, but felt secure
m knowing that the neighborhood was going to be a little safer for everyone. With the
new rezoning comes a possible apartment housing that will surely be used by the college
students. The two houses noW on this site are a perfect example of this. Housing for the
students appears to be going well with the Housing Officer at Peninsula College helping
students find affordable housing, but with an attraction of a possible new apartment
building a block away from the college aren't we setting these students up for failure.
We have been livmg at this address since 1990 and when the college had dormitories
there were huge issues with drugs, alcohol and crime in a controlled supervised setting.
By allowing an apartment building to come into this site, we are letting tbis become .
another Frat house without supervision. I also grew up in tbis neighborhood and this has
. always been an issue. Witbin the time the dormitories have been taken out there has been
147
no reduction to em-aliment, plus the police are not going to the college every other night
and the streets are a little safer for all to travel. We know that tbis is not an issue for the
people that do not live in this neighborhood, but do we really want to set young adults up
for failure for most who are away from home possibly the first time? Our last issue is the
drainage problem in this area. Drainage has always been an issue and many driveways
are being flooded each year, but the proposed property is sitting in water. Many areas are
the size of a small pond. Wetlands are a critical issue when building as you lmow and an
Engineered Drainage Plan should defInitely be needed. Tills property has always had
persistent drainage problems and even with the new sewer projects recently done along
Park Avenue we are still encountering various draining problems.
.
We ask that you will give serious consideration to this rezoning and take a look at the
whole picture. We are not asking for tbis property to not be developed and encourage the
need of additional housing on this site. We just ask that you consider keeping with the
RS-7 zoning and provide a safer, healthy environment for all who travel this road, are
enrolled in the college or in grade school and the many drainage problems that occur in
this area. Please take into consideration the amount of 52 additional people exiting and
entering the apartment complex as opposed to individual families in single-family
dwellings.
Thank you very much for your consideration on these matters and feel free to contact us
if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
.
Mark and Julie Smith
.
148
.
January 29, 2006
IIffi IE ~!E ~ \Y1 IE, 1011
. I JAN 30 2006 I illil
CITY OF PORT ANGELES I
Dept. of Community Development
POli Angeles City Planning Office and Planning ConUlussion
321 East Fifth St.
Port Angeles WA 98362
Jon and Sheri Judd
P.O. Box 3091
1132 East Lauridsen Blvd.
Port Nlgeles W A 98362
360-452-1467
RE: Rezone applicatiOll for: Applica11t: Jow Ralston
Location: Southwest corner of Park and porter streets, between Park Ave and Highland Ave
Dear Ladies & Gentlemen:
We submit tbis letter in opposition to the proposed rezone as referenced above.
We own & reside at 1132 E. Lauridsen Blvd located directly north of Sam & Annette T:ildca' s parcel to the
north of Park Street. Our property is also located directly northwest of the more recently cleared & filled
parcel on the north side of Park. We have real concerns regarding Mr. Ralston's request for rezone of the
portion of his property that is on Park Street in the center of this existing and long established .
neighborhood comprised of single family homes. Rezoning to RMD invites the over development of this
condensed area with possible multiple housing units/apartments and would drastically change the existing
character of this neighborhood community. Our ovm parcel has already been changed to RlVID without
om knowledge.
Our concerns include the most obvious and pertinent issue of increased traffic and congestion in the
immediate area and on Park Street between Franklin Elementary School and Peninsula College. We have
observed frrst-hand the increased speed and traffic on Park Street for many years. The intersection at Park
and Race streets is an increasingly treacherous one. The intersection of Park and Porter streets is also well
used with the unimproved Porter St. being the only alternate route to Race St. for access to homes up to
Campbell Ave. and above developments. Currently, traffic funnels tlrrough this route from Lauridsen Blvd
and across the end of the parking lot at Peninsula College onto Park 8t, an already cumbersome and heavily
traveled route.
The other major concern this "plateau" area, ofwbich this property lies in the middle of, is the existing and
ongoing water and drainage issues. Having lived in this immediate neighborhood for 40 years, we have
observed and experienced standing water or drainage issues of both underground and surface water run-off.
There is. almost constant water needing to run-off across these properties due to the fact we live so close to
our beloved Olympic Mountains. Fill dirt that has been diverted from the e:h.'tensive and appreciated
drainpipe and sidewalk improvements on Park St. onto the newly cleared vacant lot north of P ark has
caused water, that used to be standing in low areas there, to now drain onto neighboring yards. There have
always been known low or swampy areas in the immediate area. Future construction oflarger, apartment
style buildings in fuis fairly condensed location would inevitably use more surface ground area and could
cause water/drainage concerns for surrounding properties.
We understand the need for more housing opportunities in our city and surrounding areas and welcome
improvements to properties that are not fully developed which is part of the focus of the city's
Comprehensive plan as is being referenced in this rezone application. It is also known to us that existing
medium density & possible future bigh density areas are not far away as in the area surrounding Campbell
Ave. to the south of this neighborhood. It seerns more in line for the planning of the area to expand that
existing medium density housing area (existing apartment complexes are there) where there is more room
for growth and improvements than there is in tbis condensed parcel.
We have been proud to have Peninsula College grow and become an asset to tbis community and be near
our neighborhood. It is evident that there has not been a housing issue for students attending the college
.
.
1.49
,-
and works well with aliowing property owners/landlords across the city or county to provide rental
properties to those students looking for it. The existing buildings on this property are cunent1y designed
for student housing which seem to be the plan and apartments built there would surely attract a
concentrated population of students and be contrary to the single family home neighborhood setting that
exists.
.
Thank you very much for your consideration of these matters.
Sincerely,
/~;",~ GW0!-~! '. /\ i. I J ~
(J' VI I- fr1. LPLc-:7'ft0' ~7. Pt.J7~~ .
Jon and Sheri Judd ( /
,
.
.
150 '
I
.
.
.
1109 Grant Avenue
Fralll( Cavanaugh
Port Angeles, WaslTIngton 98362
360-457 -5524
JallUary 31,2006
Iffi ~iG~n\W~fD)
JAN 3 0 2006
I
.
i I
CITYOFPORT A I
Dept. of Communitl/ DNGjELES I
} " eve opment
-_..~--,
City of Port Angeles
Attn: Planning Department
321 E Fifth St.
POli Angeles, Washington 98362
Planning Department,
I am writing in regard to the application by lv.fr. John Ralston to have his property that is
bordered by Park Street, porter Street and Highland Avenue rezoned from RS- 7 to Rl\.1D,
Residential Single Family to Residential Medium Density.
,
It was not to long ago that the property; essentially a large rectangular piece was rezoned
from RS9 to RS7 so that a few more homes could be built on the property. (RS9 =
Minimum lot of 9000 sq. ft vs. RS7 = Minimum lot of 7000 sq. ft.)
It would seem now:rvrr. Ralston would like once again to change what he thought he
wanted from the area and go from the RS7 to the RMD level. (RMD = 7000 sq. .ft. with 2
units for the 1st 7000 sq. ft., one for each 3500 sq. ft. thereafter) I am opposed to the
rezone of an earlier rezone.
The prospective change is in an area that continues to have standing water problems, is
very near an Elementary School, very near to an Elderly Assisted Retirement home and is
a busy route to Peninsula College. Further a RMD, Residential Medium Density, spealcs
to the potential if not likely apartment buildings being built on the south side of Park.
Street. Effects oftbis would be increased traffic safety problems for the children and
senior citizens and, in my opinion would create visual pollution to what is now a well
balanced neighborhood that many enjoy. There is View Property in our neighborhood
and the building of apartments would in part destroy that for more than a few. An aside
might also be a reduction in property value in the area with the resulting tax loss because
of the potential of a less desirable area to live in.
I believe the requested rezone is a bad idea for the neighborhood given its School Zone,
Retirement Zone, road traffic use, potential loss oftax base due to lower property values
and for what it could do to what is now a most pleasant area to live in. "What will it be
the next time Mr. Ralston changes his mind. The Olympic Peninsula is growing quickly
and we its citizens depend upon the Planning Departments to zone in such a way that the
character of om area is not lost in all accommodation to the sometimes rapid indecisive
changes that are asked for... .
4/L€Jl .
~
151
POli Angeles City Planning Office and Planning Commission
321 E. Fifth Street
POIi Angeles, W A 98362
[PJ ~A~';O ll2~6 ~ [OJ I .
CITY OF PORT AN
Dept. of Community 0 GELES
eveJopment
1107 Grant Avenue
POIi Angeles, W A 98362-2728
457-5 174
January 30, 2006
RE: Rezone request by John Ralston of SW comer of Park and Porter Streets
between Park Avenue ano Highialld Avenue
Dear Office and Commission Personnel:
It has come to my attention that YOll are considering rezoning a pOliion of Mr. Ralston's property
from RS-7 Residential Single Family to RMD Residential Medium Density, Mr. Ralston hus expressed
a desire to construct an apartment building if the rezoning is allowed.
PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THE REZONING!!
I have owned my home on Grant Avenue since 1978. During that time I have been treated to a
veritable smorgasbord of City blmlders, oversights, and poorly considered ideas. lOne year I had a
river over 5 feet deep flowing through my back yard because building permits were given to build
multiple housing on streets above Grant, but with no city-mandated drainage. (Every neighbor across
the street has had to install drain fields in homes that prior to the building, never flooded.)
We suffered a failed drug/alcohol rehab house in our neighborhood, defeated an attempt to place a .
minimum security female lockup on our street of seventeen children, and continue to suffer a
denuded northwest end of our street because the city failed to supervise the mandated hedge of trees
the builder was supposed to leave behind. I've also enjoyed the company of my neighbors when their
sewer lines backed up into their homes because the city kept letting builders tie into sewer lines that
didn't drain properly (a problem most recently addressed by the construction work on Park), not to
mention our own water line problems.
I note these items because I want you to understand my enormous lack of faith in your commission's
ability to consider the consequences of your actions. Will we have "party time deluxe" in
unsupervised housing which will undoubtedly cater to college students? What about traffic concerns
so near an elementary school? What about the changed "feel" of the individual residence area--Oh
that's right, you are the same people who think prefab homes are a good mix with traditional homes
while the rest of the world realizes that prefabs belong together in parks and zone accordingly.
I support the.need for housing, just not unsupervised massed housing for college kids. I have
supported Habitat for Humanity for over fifteen years and would feel fine if they built some single
residences on Mr. Ralston's property. Why not continue to provide multiple housing on Campbell,
and leave this area residential single home? .
0;, cere, ~rV/'
~A'~ _ /'1
,-,/,,v / 7
Penny . H 11 .
.
152
.
.
.
Terry and Shelly Benda
360-452-6244
1126 Highland St.
Port Angeles, W A 98362
Janu3..."')' 31,2006
Port Angeles City Planning Office and Planning Commission
321 E. Fifth St.
Port Angeles, W A 98362
Reference: Jolm and Gail Ralston rezone 2006
Dear Port Angeles City Planning Office and Planning Commission,
\
\Vbile I am not entirely apposed to the proposed rezoning plan, I am however
concerned about the public safety issues outlined by Mr. and 1\1rs. Olsen. In addition,
currently the plateau created to s:upport the current buildings on the comer of Porter and
Park Streets, had the surrounding standing water diverted into a ditch along Highland
Street. Tbisditch dead-ends in front of my home resulting in flooding of my yard and
house foundation. A review ofthe history of my home from 1976 to present, disclosed
no previous occurrence of flooding. It appears that the current flooding of my property is
a direct result of the water diversion into the ditch along Highland Street (photos .
attached). The issue of proper drainage of the area should be addressed before a rezoning
decision is made.
Furthermore, I have a minor son that attends Franklin elementary school. I have
personally saw, on both porter and Park Street, several vehicles ignoring the posted speed
limit on their way to the collage. These speeding vehicles endanger my son as well as
other children attending the school. Vllhile the police department has been diligent and
show a strong police presence in the area, the speeders still continue. However, speed
bumps may rectify the issue.
In conclusion I am in support of the neighborhood subcommittee's concerns and
opposition to the rezoning proposal. I feel these c~ncems are legitinlate and need to be )
resolved prior to any rezoning decision is made.
"'--'",
{L?: '/ " .
. e~ Shelly Benda
Home owner
153
.
.
Head of diversionary drainage ditch into Highland St.
.
154
.
.
.
r~~7!';'-
.....'1
Additional drainage ditch into HigW.and 81.
155
~~~~~~t.-.
:''''.:it;':;.
.
. ~..I'
. . ..... '-'..~ !'
",".:~i~.
',~FJ'~" ;'.,?:it
~~~~l~~i
.
Diversion bead into Highland 8t.
.
156
.
-"'"
--...
-.
(1)
~
e.
0
\:j
(TQ
~
UQ
e::
~
p...
C/)
r+
ri-
a
~
~
p...
(I)
-.I ........
........
01 tv
....... 0\
~
Uo
e::
~
p...
C/)
r+
.
.
.
.
View along Highland 8t towards Collage
.
158
.
.
....;
Cf)
'""d
g
:2
bll
......
::q
\0
("',1
,........
,........
'-H
o
~
0;
~
.S
~
:~
'""d
<1)
bll
ro
.S
ro
.-8
'+-<
o
bll
.S
1\
[.r.4
0..
It)
-
.
.
',,'" -=~_ ..;::o-:Y'l'"
..,."~~~t/'i:~:~1
.
1126 hi
ghland Street
.
160
.
.
.
L. Commet
1117 Grant Avenue
Port AJ.lgeles, W A 98362
January 31, 2006
I ~ ~A~ ;O~2~6~1[DJ
I CITYOFPORT ANG
I DePt~~~o.~.T~~!.!X.~.~vel~~~t
City of Port Angeles Plamung Department
321 East Fifth Street
Port Angeles, Wasillngton 98362
Dear City Planners:
I am writing to express my concern about the rezoning proposed near Peninsula College,
at Park Avenue and Porter Street in the Highland area. This area was zoned for single
family residences, as 'is the area in which I live on Grant. When I purchased my home, I
expected the undeveloped areas in our neighborhood to eventually be built with similar
residences, maintaining the existing values, both monetary and aesthetic.
Since there are many undeveloped areas in other areas ofthe city which are already
zoned for medium and high density housing, it does not seem necessary or advisable to
approve this rezoning request. The area has already been rezoned for RS-7, which can be
quite unattractive as demonstrated by the two residences recently built in that area. These
"homes" will never attract families, as they don't even have living rooms! It is obvious
they are for short term renters and, in fact, are currently rented by groups of peninsula
College students. At least twice since they were built, police vehicles have been parked
in front of these residences, one must assume for reasons of illegal activity.
The Peninsula College dorms were recently removed. In the two years prior to their
removal, there were criminal incidents at the dorms fairly routinely - including rape, drug
deals, alcohol abuse, and theft. These crimes occurred "'With dorm security and residence
advisor staff for the dorms on the college payroll! Now that the dorms are gone, the
students are dispersed throughout the area. Peninsula College reports they have been
successful in finding housing for the students so far. There is no need for "medium
density" or "high density" housing in the immediate neighborhood of the college, and
there are good reasons to avoid it sinye groups of students will have higher illegal
activity, especially with no security or residence advisors monitoring the area.
Please deny the request to rezone for medium density rezoning. And please, in the future,
require residence building plans to have at le'ast a living room or family room in this
"single family" neighborhood! Thank you.
Sincerely,
ciitl~~
Loretta Commet
161
City of Port Angeles Planning Department
321 E. 5th St.
Port Angeles, W A 98362
1110 Grant Ave.
Port Angeles, W A 98362
(360)417-1292 .
[Ai [E(G[E~WlE ~
JAN 3 0 2006
January 31, 2006
Dear Planning Department Staff and Commission Members:
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
I Dept. of Camm!Jntt" f)n"....ln,..............
._... ] _Vy....IUI-'IlICiltl
This letter is regarding a proposed zoning change in our neighborhood which we feel would be misguided
and inappropriate.
We are writing about the application by Mr. John Ralston to change the zoning on his property bordering on
Park Avenue, Porter Street and Highland Avenue. He is applying for a rezone from Residential Single
Family to Residential Medium Density (RS-7 to RMD).
We believe that this proposed higher density change so close to the College is aimed at targeting, or
exploiting the student housing market. The potential for very high rents for the owner (houses rented by the
room) will obviously benefit a developer, but the rezone and its inevitable higher-density structures will also,
we believe, clearly negatively impact the surrounding neighborhood and the City. The City has determined it
needs low-income housing for working families. There's every indication that this rezoning won't fit that
need. Peninsula College students are currently dispersed throughout the city, integrated into the
neighborhoods without high concentrations. A higher-density apartment complex will actually amount to an
unmonitored "student ghetto", a dorm situation without the ownership or oversight of the College, which is
not appropriate to squeeze in this particular location, and a mistake that can be avoided. Peninsula .
College shut down its own dorms in large part because of uncontrolled and uncontrollable drinking,
violence, and sexual harassment. A rezone to this higher density here would be quite profitable for a
developer, but would not serve the City and the rest of us.
Traffic and noise and considerably higher density all add up to radical physical change for the worse
both for the immediate neighbors and for this intact, functioning neighborhood. These byproducts of
rezoning will change the nature of the area in ways that are unsafe (vehicle traffic will greatly increase), and
unnecessary (there is currently no actual shortage of student housing according to the Peninsula College
Student Housing Office, and no applicant to Peninsula College is discouraged by a perceived student
housing shortage).
We ask that you consider our opinion that that this area, which borders an elementary school, a retirement center
and many single-family dwellings, cannot sustain the proposed level of increased noise, vehicle traffic, and numb~rs
of occupants and vehicles which will follow a rezoning. We are not against development, and certainly have no bias
against students per se. But this property has already been rezoned from R9 to R7, which is a much more
appropriate compromise for the current neighborhood and its wonderful feel. This is something worth fighting for.
In summary, we feel that a positive recommendation by City Planning staff regarding this rezone application and
an approval by the Planning Commission would be inappropriate and unwise planning. While we recognize the
need for and inevitability of growth in oui' neighborhood, we are looking for smart zoning that would
" enhance an already-nice neighborhood. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Adrian Hoban Linda Humphrey
.
162
.
.
.
1132 Highland A ve:nue
Port Angeles, VIlA 98362-2730
Ja..'1ua..'-y 28, 2006
Loran 3I.ld RuttfQlSi .~ [E U Wi ~ IT I
360-452-0703 lilli' lb WJ
I I JAN 3 0 2006
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Dept. of Community Development
Port Angeles City Planning Office and Planning Commission
321 E. Fifth 8t.
Port Angeles, W A 98362
John and Gail Ralston Rezone 2006
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We submit herewith a letter in opposition to the proposed rezone.
Background Information: The first week of December, 2005, John Ralston called me,
and subsequently came to our home on Highland Avenue to talk about his plans to
request a rezone for his property on the south side of Park Avenue. He said his intention
is to request RMD (Residential Medium Density) zoning for the north.portions of those
lots (1,2,3,4) that eA.'iend from Porter Street westward to Penny Miller's. According to
his plan the south portions that border Highland A venue would remain RS 7 (Residential
Single Family 7000 square feet per unit) as they have been since 1993. He gave me a
map, asking that I talk with my neighbors, since we had opposed his request for a similar
rezone ten years ago. He hoped to have our blessing concerning this plan, implying that
we shouldn't have to oppose it if it were properly understood. RMD allows 13 units per
acre, while low density single family lots (RS7) allow about 8 units per acre.
We discussed several other things. I expressed my appreciation that he told us his plans,
and said I would do as he suggested. I spoke with Tom Deeney, Penny :Miller, Sam
Tiklca, Bill Mercer, and others, distributing copies of John's map. On Wednesday,
December 21st, Penny Miller, Tom Deeney and I met with Vice President of
Administrative Services Barbara Martin at Peninsula College. I had talked to Sue
Roberds and others in the Port Angeles Planning Department for background
information, to supplement our extensive materials remaining from the Ralston attempt to
rezone to RMD back in 1996. (John's later attempt in 1998 to short plat lots 17 and 4,
which would have resulted in two panhandle lots, was opposed by City Engineer Gary
Kenworthy and Brad Collins of the Planning Department.) On December 28th Sue
Roberds and I had a long telephone conversation regarding related matters.
The neighborhood subcommittee first met at Sam Tikka's home on Thursday eveDing,
December 29,2005. Sam and Mrs. Tikka, Penny Miller, Tom Deeney and I compared
John's maps, the present zoning map, and new Comprehensive Plan map. Each of us set
out to learn more from various sources. At the January ih subcommittee meeting Penny
shared information from several sources. I related discussions with Scott Johns at the
Planning Department. Sam learned from Ryker Construction (whose land is being :filled
and graded next door to Sam) that his plans are for are high-end housing, not apartments.
Tom shared discussions he held with others. We met once more on January 21 st. We
opened the first neighborhood meeting at First Christian Church on Friday, January 27,
sharing copies of all information and maps.
163
Since Highland Avenue zoning is 110t changed by the proposed rezone plan, those of us
living here might simply agree to it. But that would leave Penny Miller alone as she
copes with the unhappy possibility of college apartments mushrooming next door to her.
.
Varied Neighborhood. Vlith RS9, RS7, RMD, Bonneville Power, Laurel Park,
Crestwood, Franklin School, Peninsula College; Olympic National Park, First Christian
Church, our neighborhood has great variety and no changes are needed.
_~+,..,,;_.., ..... ,..~_,.....1,.." .C'......-..-..~l...J _r...,..:,.1~.......+;ol __.....Arlr'"t..n~.....p.:n"',...t:l. T-I' I;)11("\'t'l7C' -trY''' ;Jp'1:/t::.ll\"t"'\"t"'nP't"'\+ anrl rrt"'''''''IM.l''\
1 Cilallli::l a L)1l.L~J."'" .Lt.L1J..11.1] 1. ........:J.1Ut-l.1.LL.1U.J. }'.l vUU.1.U...L.L.LL-Ll..LV'-"0 ..Llo .....J..LV "l' 1..1 .1.U.L ~...... '( _.1.'-'~.1...l..L""'.l..u.. t..I..L.LU 5.L LI VV 1..1..1,
Zoning. The present zoning ofRS7 for the property in question serves two purposes. It
serving as a transition zone among all surrounding zones. It is the only such zoning
(white on Zoning Map) within many blocks, and gives variety ne:h.'1 to the present RMD
zoning on the north, RS9 zoning south and west, and Bonneville Power to the east. It
allows a density that Highland and Park might handle reasonably. In 1993 .Tolm Ralston
made a case for the need for RS7 housing, and was granted a rezone from RS9 to RS7.
Drainage. As yet only two houses have been built on this land, holding four students
each. But already the water drainage from these two, redirected south and west into a
new ditch along the north side of Highland, has resulted in standing water that does not
drain westward across Jolm Ralston's Lot 17. Construction is not supposed to cause new
standing water problems where there were none. I wrote to and spoke with the city about
this drainage problem, was assured last summer that it would be addressed, and yet it has
not been. January's severe rains have raised the water table around Terry Benda's house
at the end of Highland, and seepage into his basement is imminent. There have been
persistent drainage problems plaguing this whole plateau area. Even the City's new street
and sewer projects along Park are encountering various water drainage problems.
.
Traffic. Since the corner of Park and Porter has a convergence of traffic from college,
high school, and Beacon Hill Addition drivers, it is ripe for accidents. Speeders ignore
20 mph limits along Franklin School and 25 mph limits ort Park-and Porter. It seems only
a matter oftime until someone is maimed or killed, particularly with an elderly walking
population, joggers, and grade school kids. Thankfully, the City has provided sidewalks,
but the widened street of Park is still a racetrack. A zone change is not wise because it
could add a potential 52 residents who need to enter and exit Park from their apartments.
College Housing. Though it may seem logical to city planners to have college
apartments or dormitories on this corner next to campus, it makes no sense to those of us
who live here. We bought our homes assuming the neighborhood would remain a
neighborhood. We do not appreciate the prospect of "party central" next doc;>r, with all
the concomitant problems this implies. Police cars have appeared twice this past summer
in front of John Ralston's new rental house on Porter. What was that all about? The
folks on this corner, ranging from little kids to an aged population, don't need a new
influx of over 50 college students. Peninsula College has students housed adequately
around the city, and not concentrated in anyone area. This work.s well.
Thank you for your consideratio~oran and Ruth Olsen
.t:?4~ ~J
J(~1j @d~
164
.
.
.
.-
,I .1' 1,1
t-'Or/~ J Vf'.
Ifffif~ ~ [E D Wi lEI ~I
I 1.1. A;.' /} 7/ 'OOR I I
I -- /~'i" cr.?; .. J
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Dept. of Community Development
o .j .. --
of L (Jjl)/~'-)V{'J)+j "f.f.{!.t:U){)/}')u:, /.)el!.ej'-f~'?"
{~f/
fo'l} f)/If) e ItJUp-J '
f~
-) .
. L. .
~.( ! ~ ~
/f) UJ/W.l'lj /' /J1l11 t:i!/JLr!'//:>j /1 f
."kt'J'el/h /0 6:.--IcdC.d //;d/;:;- ttJ.---J:... igue .
/ I' 'J
. ')
; /ci---c;..- /.:..::~ 'J,--
.~ "'::7
r v~,::)
/?Ci/?7€: /.5
,L/)tt./-CL ./~;/t?d :h~e-~l!'
~2
tV
.... . iT/7-f
!
_.!..aho4.f
I
I' J,,--t.w'"
I I.. ~..
j l
I
.1 iv/!I 0'Pcl::
/~C,"'? - /.. </.J" ';,., /-/;/ ;'p .
11"1"'1 -rv ~.- -:e..! "'.-r.,. /..,,,k .7Z--o-e/7
/O?/f'arJ .:;.'Jd 11(.,.-/l??,/110rn
1
I-/t;wev-.e,~ /:;; 10~l/e 5C.'rJ"--e
Jt'/?Ctf/f?S h7':;"'-/-
-1...11' 'r .. .- J'
I Ii 1-1 _ _ . J/.",.. L:../'" -e:-
r T~-'
~r. J;t~1 /
7/:.(2, , /L
//:1 -! l/ I?)
.wh ;{j;'
t;2./r)f /71t:'Y.e.
J:C?lJ<
:-h;'.,e .
.I;'t/i II
j I
I I ..
.-1 (tj~e!
'I
J'--
.___I.tV!?'?
!
;
/oj /. '''~!/>.t't:"" _Ii):.:"'- '-fA Of fi;lvj?;Hi~) II',., ...._...J..I...I.,.l'..j..'...._...5__=i~_c-_r:.er...'...,
.....~ (-I.(MJ'I' .7' .'.:::/1.J ...L,l.'~'-rAt..:J .';'0.'5' .C!.I.7.q T:L- __u_ .
-, I ~ t z ,
.wl.fh ,'-:/iJ.,{:' . .q/X(l'/Jf /;.]J-J,;,lei ..s;,:l{'.v~/(~.J..q _.itreq. j7tt./e,_~__. . U'..
1'.h?~!1 .I),j. Y-A'=e. .c+he/ ;Z'1{.!. k=!r ./Jt-..J
j I~\ //'~) t' -'; [I -I- .0 ne.. ... [lad i: .L(~;' P
.--r,L..../'e}l'..... - c.. "7'''
'1 j'i / 1 " J' . J...i
.--l:~.rg.e./.~r1b{)!.i.+ .1v{(Ufe/ fb,,-IL./I.J:Fi.s--lelj/v.(!j.)/c;:me., . k/lt .:.1. '4 'ft"..".dd.. .__
.._ '__"_ _..._.I...~--...ekJf.r-/1 It.Aufrj;.jydh ,"..r ...l;~;f.iL.._o"/I.!J,)1.e-, cr-f ~""O;;'1.~~1-d._..l) l5/i'r .. C"'"
...._ !-&fa. v1?l7CC!kP't....., Jke IJti'c1ed. Th,j.5A~ef 11(;.r...a.lr.:e<,.d:;J...5..f~~~._.___
1 1
! /. .. --H' I.
y. D..1r(,~-~. ']ft.; j L.....tnvi.~d~e:..+_.../.I)....c.'".r-".(J.e....,.J.... \r"'.~>.o... /..1-., ...
.....--lq.::'{..V,'./::LI..l//'t". C--' 1.....-:91 wa:J......{.,u~h. -'- c. --' _"..0'_
I
1 ___ . / '. // t'r'J //" -..f' /. '-"
_I. i__t...VC1i.{/d.-I7?F ...f-f7t...+ yr-e j :::t:7:;:}J9'=: we :h:~e. p. .-..fie ._e!/,Idr:e...-:- ".- ....-.-.
....__ j ...ct~, '-Ik /h IICs /1 i; I :2:;/2...+.. laVlIr..eJ /ry:/( u!uu.lcL. bf!.__er10Uyh ..:I-e -I&iI:~r1_.
I
j i . I j
-I-dw.o '*1)/0 . f'Pf!JJ .,A..
.. i
/
I
.--
.... jl1tl/~j(. it.:', :..
..__..} o.
j
I
,
...j .
I
i
.u_ I ..
.1.
i
I
I
i
'--r' "
j
i
I
--I
I
J
~Jih0-;
.-. I. CJ/ J_-
....:0/0. lOOt ~-!721YZ7__.. _/e:~
G [~Ilc>\ Je(\ \) -A J q 03 Lr
.165.
...:--
.
~
.
.
166
." ,.
~~io
~ :3-7-()f.t;
PRESENTATION FOR MARCH 7TH, P.A. CITY COUNCIL HEARING.
MY NAME IS LORAN OLSEN. MY WIFE RUTH AND I LIVE AT 1132
HIGHLAND AVENUE. WE HAVE OWNED THIS HOME SINCE 1985, BUT
RETIRED IN 1993 FROM WSU AT PULLMAN TO LIVE HERE PERMANENTLY.
THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK THIS EVENING.
YOU HAVE OUR LETTERS OPPOSING THE RALSTON REZONE REQUEST, AND
ADDRESSING THE GOOD VARIETY IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH
CONSISTS OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, SCHOOLS, NURSING HOMES,
ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES, AN ART MUSEUM, BONNEVILLE POWER,
COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES LANDS, AND OTHER PUBLIC LANDS. IN THOSE
LETTERS WE INCLUDED OUR CONCERNS ABOUT DRAINAGE, TRAFFIC, AND
RELA TED MATTERS. FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF
FEBRUARY 8TH, 2006, WE BEGIN.
THE CRUX OF THIS WHOLE DEBATE IS SUMMARIZED ON PAGE TWO,
PARAGRAPH 2: "STEVE ZENOVIC ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THERE ARE
DRAINAGE ISSUES IN THE AREA BUT DID NOT BELIEVE THAT ONE
DEVELOPER OR PROPERTY OWNER SHOULD BE PENALIZED OR MADE TO
SUFFER DUE TO HISTORIC ISSUES IN THE AREA." OUR QUESTION TO YOU
IS, "WHO THEN SHOULD BE PENALIZED OR MADE TO SUFFER? INDIVIDUAL
PROPERTY OWNERS WHO INVESTED IN HOMES LONG BEFORE RALSTON
CAME ON THE SCENE AS A SPECULATOR IN 1992? OR NEW PURCHASERS
OF HOMES SOON TO FEEL THE IMP ACT OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGES?"
IN FACT THE PROPOSAL BEFORE YOU (CONTRARY TO STAFF FINDING #9,
PAGE 5) DOES REPRESENT A "SPOT ZONE" OF A SMALL PARCEL OF LAND
SINGLED OUT FOR PRIVILEGED TREATMENT. IT IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF
ONE DEVELOPER AND NOT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST. IT IS NOT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. (GOAL C. POLICIES,
PARAGRAPH 1, LAST SENTENCE, PAGE 3, SECTION V. LAND-USE ELEMENT:
"A NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD BE PRIMARILY COMPOSED OF LOW, MEDIUM
OR HIGH DENSITY HOUSING.") IT DOES NOT SAY "AND." THIS HAS BEEN
AND SHOULD REMAIN A LOW DENSITY NEIGHBORHOOD.
STAFF CONCLUSION 6, PAGE 6 STATES: "AS NO ADVERSE IMPACTS TO
NEIGHBORING STREETS ARE ANTICIP A TEl) AND STREET, WALKWAY,
PARKING AND DRAINAGE WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED WITH SUBSEQUENT
DEVELOPMENT, THE PROPOSED REZONE IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST." THE
ORANGE BARRELS ON PARK AVENUE SHOW THAT THIS CONCLUSION IS
ALREADY IN ERROR, AND MY NEIGHBORS WILL ELABORATE SHORTLY.
ON FEBRUARY 8TH WE MADE A SUCCESSFUL CASE BEFORE THE PLANNING
COMMISSION THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP HAD BEEN CHANGED
i
. '.
ERRONEOUSL Y OR CAPRICIOUSLY IN 2003. ACCORDING TO SUE ROBERDS
AND COMMISSIONER RASMUSSEN THAT CHANGE HAD BEEN MADE BY
BRAD COLLINS TO BALANCE A MAP CHANGE ON THE WEST SIDE OF TOWN,
FROM HIGH TO MEDIUM. SO HE ALTERED THE CRESTWOODILAUREL PARK
AREA AT THE P ARK/PORTER INTERSECTION FROM MEDIUM TO HIGH. HE
SIMPL Y CHOSE THIS AS A LIKEL Y AREA TO MEET HIS DESIRE FOR
"BALANCE." PLEASE REFER TO MAPS "Xl, X2, X3." DID THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE 2003 MAP CHANGE SIGHT
UNSEEN? APPARENTLY SO. DO HOME OWNERS NEED TO ATTEND EVERY
MARCH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO WATCH FOR CAPRICIOUS
CHANGES TO THE COMP PLAN MAP THAT MIGHT ADVERSELY AFFECT
THEM IN THE FUTURE? WOULD THEY EVEN BE ALLOWED TO SPEAK?
DURING LAST MONTH'S PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A CITY
ENGINEER PRODUCED AN UPDATED TABLE THAT ADDRESSES QUESTIONS
OF ZONING DENSITIES ACROSS THE CITY. I REFER YOU TO TABLE "Y"
ENTITLED "RESIDENTIAL SECTOR." ACCORDING TO THE CITY'S NEW
TABLE THE PERCENTAGE OF UNDEVELOPED ACRES OF RS7 ZONED LAND
NOW IS ONLY 8 %, WHEREAS THE PERCENTAGE OF UNDEVELOPED ACRES
OF RMD ZONED LAND IS 13 %. WHERE IS THE STATISTICAL SUPPORT FOR A
GREATER NEED FOR RMD THAN RS7? THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE, BY OVER 60
PERCENT. AFFORDABLE SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLINGS SERVED BY RS7
ZONING ARE IN SHORT SUPPLY.
IN THE ZONING HEARINGS OF 1996 THE CITY'S OWN STATISTICS SHOWED
ONL Y 4 PERCENT OF ITS TOTAL TO BE ZONED MULTIPLE F AMIL Y (RMD
AND RHD). USING RALSTON'S LOTS AS THE CENTER AND HIS SUGGESTED
RADIUS THAT INCLUDED PENINSULA COLLEGE, OUR ENGINEER SHOWED
THAT THE AREA IN QUESTION HELD 8 PERCENT DEVOTED TO RMD AND
RHD ZONING. IN OTHER WORDS, BACK THEN WE WERE ALREADY AT
TWICE THE CITY'S HIGHER DENSITIES. TODAY WITH ALL THIS AREA'S
NEW DEVELOPMENT SOUTH OF CAMPBELL AVENUE, MULTIPLE F AMIL Y
PRESENCE (RMD AND RHD) HAS CERT AINL Y INCREASED. YET TODA Y'S
TABLE "Y" SHOWS THE WHOLE CITY'S PERCENTAGE OF HIGHER DENSITIES
(RMD & RHD) AS STILL 25 PERCENT UNDEVELOPED. WHO NEEDS MORE?
LET'S LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF THE RALSTONS' INVOLVEMENT HERE.
THESE LOTS, ZONED ORIGINALLY RS9, WERE PURCHASED IN 1992. SOON
RALSTONS REQUESTED A REZONE TO RS7, GRANTED IN 1993. THEY HAD
MADE THE CASE THAT RS7 ZONED LAND WAS GREA TL Y NEEDED IN THE
CITY. BUT THEY NEVER WERE ABLE TO SELL ANY LOTS AT THE ASKING
PRICE. THEN CAME THEIR 1996 REQUEST FOR REZONING TO RMD WITH A
NEW RATIONALE. THAT WAS DEFEATED AT THE CITY COUNCIL LEVEL.
LATER THEIR REQUEST FOR AN "ARKANSAS SHORT PLAT" OF LOTS 17 AND
4 IN 1998 WAS DISALLOWED BY GARY KENWORTHY AND BRAD COLLINS
BECAUSE OF PROPOSED DOGLEGS ONTO HIGHLAND AVENUE.
2
.. ., .,
NOW AS WE ARE ADDRESSING ANOTHER RALSTON REZONE PLAN THE
QUESTION OF ADEQUATE DRAINAGE IS STILL WITH US. JOHN'S TWO
SMALL HOUSES RECENTLY BUILT FOR COLLEGE STUDENT OCCUPANTS,
AND THE LOTS NEARBY, DRAIN SOUTHWARD DOWN TO HIGHLAND
AVENUE (PHOTO "Z"). JOHN HAD A DITCH DUG (MAP "X3"), PARALLEL TO
HIGHLAND, SUPPOSEDLY TO DIRECT THAT RUNOFF WATER WESTWARD.
BUT THE WATER STOPS IN THE THICK WEEDS OF HIS LOT 17, RESULTING IN
STAGNANT STANDING WATER ALONG HIGHLAND WHERE THERE WAS
NONE BEFORE, AND POTENTIAL SEEPAGE INTO TERRY BENDA'S
BASEMENT (PHOTOS "Zl" AND "Z2"). THE CITY HAS NOT RESPONDED TO
MY THREE REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THIS MA ITER. IF DRAINAGE FROM
TWO SMALL HOUSES RESULTS IN NEW STANDING WATER ON HIGHLAND,
WHAT WILL DRAINAGE FROM 13 UNITS PER ACRE RMD PRODUCE?
WHEN JOHN FILLED IN LOT 17 AT THE ALLEY, HE AFFECTED TOM
DEENEY'S UNDERGROUND RUNOFF DRAINAGE PIPE, IN PLACE FOR
DECADES. INSTEAD OF THE DEVELOPER MAKING IT RIGHT, JOHN
EXTRACTED FUNDS FROM DEENEY TO PAY FOR A CATCH BASIN ON
JOHN'S LOT 17 FOR DEENEY'S RUNOFF ("X3"). WHO IS BEING PENALIZED?
I MENTION THESE MA TTERS AT THE REQUEST OF MY NEIGHBORS,
BECAUSE TERRY BENDA IS NOW BACK IN QATAR, AS A CIVILIAN
SECURITY PERSON WORKING THE WAR IN IRAQ. TOM DEENEY IS IN
CALIFORNIA FIGHTING HIS CANCER. NEITHER IS HERE TO. SPEAK TO HIS
F AMIL Y'S PROPERTY INTERESTS.
THE RALSTON REQUEST IS ACTUALLY FOR A "SPOT ZONE:"
A SMALL PARCEL SINGLED OUT FOR PRIVILEGED TREATMENT;
FOR THE BENEFIT OF ONE DEVELOPER;
NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN;
AND NOT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST.
THE REQUEST SHOULD BE DEFEATED BECAUSE RS7 ZONING IS ADEQUATE
TO MEET THIS DEVELOPER'S NEEDS AS HE STATED THEM PREVIOUSLY,
AND BECAUSE SINGLE F AMIL Y RESIDENCES ARE IN DEMAND ACCORDING
TO THE CITY'S NEWEST STATISTICS. THERE ARE ALSO CONDITIONAL
USES ALLOWED UNDER RS7 (NURSING & CONVALESCENT HOMES,
ASSISTED LIVING & RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITIES) THAT WOULD
RECEIVE NO OPPOSITION FROM OUR GROUP OF CONCERNED NEIGHBORS.
WE LIVE HERE IN F AMIL Y HOMES. ASSESSMENTS AND TAXES ARE
BALLOONING. WE WILL BE AFFECTED BY WHAT YOU DECIDE TONIGHT.
THANK YOU FOR LISTENING.
-:3
~
-"
'"
Ind
LOR
N HOR
'003)
:>6
N
~~
:M
t
ill
/
f/jewcrest f~'
--n <=
1='
Jr' l parcel
~ Street centerlinel
Land use
~~
l'
1~'
I,
-T1rt/'
-rkdLLJ-r-
Land use
Comm
MOR
Open
r\.cU~lur I r\.eLur leI u U uu IVI~lur 1
J ...; ~'
..... ~.'
! , J{J(A
N
t
E Rlc( Irf
I'. ~ I~___ =
(hIU1~ ~ ~. ~~_ W'
~ - .. ~_ 0 ,~
r~ 0 '-{@;@" .~g~~ /@' -B' ~~ j
CA J 1\ f\r ~ VGJ I-J' tgtntn~ ," '.
rf7 ') fl'C}YJ)A 01..581 '1\
.y y" - ,M;\X " LP"'El-)f J
RVrlO.f( .:~ J:J {I
"Iii' .. ao t; ~'~
f~r:VH;~~1 ~) !
1 / Nmry 9lElKc.-~rI'LlJE"/I[ I
('M~ PLAN ~A" l.a. ... J'"
- -,.-
,
BPA
Legend
~ parcel
......-. Street centerline
land use
Land_use
:::J Comm
~~;~,~ I nd
LOR
MOR
_HOR
~ Open
v,
Cr;
---------
-J
'",
-----
March 3, 2006
Port Angeles City Council
Penny Miller
Mailing address: PO Box 442
Home address: 1130 E. Park Ave.
Port Angeles, W A 98362
(360) 452-2983
RE: Rezone application for: Applicant: John Ralston
Location: Southwest comer of Park and Porter Streets, between Park
A venue and Highland Avenue
Dear Gentlepeople:
I own and reside at 1130 E. Park Avenue in Port Angeles on the property directly adjacent to the lots
referenced above. As you know, Mr. Ralston has requested that a portion of this property be rezoned from
RS-7 Residential Single Family to RMD Residential Medium Density.
The City Planning Department has recommended approval of the rezoning and has provided a written
report outlining findings in support of their recommendation.
I oppose the rezoning to RMD; and find issue with many of the findings outlined in the Planning Division's
report.
The entire area has serious drainage issues. The City of Port Angeles has been working for the past 7
months on repaving E. Park A venue. The areas between Porter and Race Street continue to buckle and sink
due to water flow below the surface. The property referred to on the Project Information Map as Lot 4-A
already has a large pool of surface water on it, which is present from October through May of each year.
The properties located at 1008 E. Park A venue and 1006 E. Park A venue have both had significant sewage
problems as a result of the areas drainage problems. The rezoning to medium density would allow
construction of apartment buildings on the property in question. The parking lots required for the tenants
would further exacerbate the existing serious drainage problems on the property and it's surrounding areas;
including the street.
#1) The planning department Staff Analysis states "The Comprehensive Plan land use designation of the
subject property is Low Density Residential along the southern portion of the site, while the northerly Yt is
located within an imprecise margin between Low Density Residential to the south and High Density
Residential to the north. The High Density Residential designation extends south into the Park Avenue
right-of-way." (Page 2, paragraph 5) Loren Olsen has since been told by Sue Roberds of the Planning
Division that the designation of the property to the North as High Density Residential was made in error
and will be changed back to RMD in the March revisions to the Comprehensive Plan land use map. This
argument should be removed from consideration.
#2) The planning department argues for the need for approval based on a "relative shortage of medium
density designated areas to low density designated areas within the City". (Page 2, paragraph 6) They
however use data from 2003, three years ago. In the meeting before the Planning Commission,
Commissioner Kalish pointed out that she was familiar with many approvals in increased zoning density
within the city in the recent past and felt that those figures were inappropriate to use to base any decision
on for additional increased density rezoning. Prior to any approval of rezoning, please provide updated
data to ensure those members of the City Council can make an informed decision.
#3) The planning department Findings and Conclusions in Support ofREZ 06-01 - Ralston, #3 (Page 5)
states "The location supports several other multi family developments and is found opposite the main BP A::
power substation and near Peninsula College. Medium density housing should be located where a higher
concentration of residents is compatible with existing development." The only multi family
developments in the area are Laurel Park Assisted Living and Crestwood Convalescent Center. The
balance are single family homes and the neighborhood wants it to stay that way; which is why we are
all here. We may not all feel comfortable getting up and speaking but our presence should speak for
itself; we are here because we oppose this rezoning request and want you to keep our neighborhood
confined to single family residential homes.
#4) The planning department Findings and Conclusions #13 (Page 6) states "Peninsula College recently
removed on campus dormitory space further exacerbating the housing supply." I recently joined two
neighboring landowners to meet with Barbara Martin, Vice President of Administrative Services of
Peninsula College. We discussed the rezoning request and Peninsula Colleges' student housing situation
given the recent demolition of the dormitory units on campus. Ms. Martin said the college would not be
making a statement either for or against this rezoning request. She was able to confIrm the following
information: The college has no knowledge of reduced enrollment as a result ofthe removal of the
dormitories. The college provides a Housing Officer to assist in locating affordable housing and the current
student population is scattered throughout the City of Port Angeles. The college has been able to fInd
adequate housing for the students requesting this service. Ms. Martin also stated that when the dorms were
in use that out of an estimated 90 college students from outside communities needing housing on average
only approximately 30 students used the dorm housing at any given time. The students did not like the
dormitory arrangements, which required shared use of kitchens and other facilities. Thirty students is
certainly not a significant number impacting the housing supply in our city.
Our neighborhood presently consists of single-family homes. This is a community of neighbors that
provides support to one another; we care about our each other and our neighborhood. If this rezoning is
allowed, apartments will be built on this site and you are going to end up with transient tenants as many of
the college students in living arrangements currently scattered throughout the city will be drawn to move to
apartments in such close proximity to the college. Those students who chose not to live in a dormitory
situation will welcome an opportunity to live in an apartment a block from the college.
You are going to dramatically change the quality of this neighborhood if you approve this rezoning.
The existing community encourages construction of additional single family homes in the
neighborhood but does not want apartments filled with tenants who have no vested interest in the
local community; who will live here long enough to complete their studies at the college and move
back to the communities from which they came.
Please do not penalize the entire community because one landowner wants increased zoning to increase his
profIts from the sale of his property.
Sincerely,
Penny Miller
".
."t
. ,
.
. .
I,
,'~ij~
, d ~~~~
'AI ~.
~ f. : )
I
. .(
.....6 ,"
,p.../
': J..
:~W
'\
:.,
,",'
0"f/
1.;......
\' os
"
l
I
J
-"
D
'J
I
I
ii' '-l'
"""....
"",411I"""',..
j-""'T"'"'"----'------'
l,....eJJ '."...1;.,&,..1:.;
....1. ."._,...~
:J[
1..,"1
f 1 ( ',.--,
-
"i!!l"'" .___
.~~--~~
I
-II
r---
'I
~~--~"'~'_'
I"; .
{., ,,'.
li'-'\
....--".--...-----.~.~~-~-,-*,...~.,_._.._____M___"__~___________._........_...___~__.._.___............
.---------~------------~-.......-.---....-I;".
THE Th'll)JT" AJ,...TG"~lE', S.
COTY OFj-=:..:::.<.!lX' n'!l; ',~~,'. .
WAS H J N' G TON, U. S.
f(.
)
Residential Sector
1.30.g4 ~/O 1/5.dl~ /f9
4
. --~._----~.._~-_.~-~._.~-._..- -'-'-'--~-~
1
10-1
i
;;,c:)
,~
(~
~)'
,
< ,,\
jJ
.,
"
:.)~
. ~,.j~~
I"-'-;'''~;o~l~!(
;' l~t~~~~~ .t,i
~' 'Ii
'" '"1,..,'1,,
' ~"
"')
'll'
(~,:~,'
.
~~"DO"~D-T... .!lA:"~-ll"'t:gt>>S
I.=-. Art.~(iD'D .......
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
March 7, 2006
To:
CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing to Consider Reprogram Use of Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) General Purpose Grant
SUMMARY: The OlyCAP requested from the City a loan of$30,000 for the purpose of completing
construction of a dental clinic to serve low-income people in the City of Port Angeles. The State
CDBG Program requires two public hearings to be conducted to provide information and seek input,
particularly from low and moderate income persons, as to the use of CDBG funds.
.
RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, receive public input, and continue the public
hearin to March 21, 2006.
BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS:
Olympic Community Action Programs (OlyCAP) is a non-profit corporation, seeking to complete
construction of a dental clinic to serve low-income people in the City of Port Angeles. OlyCAP has
asked the City for a loan of $30,000 from CDBG grant funds.
A proposed Loan Agreement and Promissory Note are attached. They require repayment in full
within five years.
A dental clinic, such as OlyCAP proposes, is an eligible CDBG purpose. However, the funds now
held by the City were originally designed for low-income housing. To lend funds for the dental'
clin~t $30,000 be "reprogrammed" That, in turn, requires twn public hearings.
i' /
{,
WillIam . lnnr
City Attorney
.
Attachment
WEB\dl
G:\LEGAL\MEMOS.2006\Council.0IyCapLoan-CDBG Grant.030 1J>6ft
.
.
.
168
.
.
.
Loan Agreement
Olympic Community Action Programs
This Loan Agreement ("Agreement") is made as of the day of March, 2006'
between the City of Port Angeles (the "City") and Olympic Community Action Programs (hereinafter
referred to as "OlyCAP"), a non-profit corporation.
AGREEMENT
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES HEREIN, OLYCAP AND THE CITY
AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
FUNDS
The City holds certain CDBG funds granted to the City for the purpose of providing loans to
private individuals for limited housing rehabilitation projects, the pay-off of which loans has accrued to
the City and is held for reuse in accordance with federal CDBG regulations; and,
OlyCAP proposes to borrow $30,000 of those funds to be used for a dental clinic to serve low
income people in the City of Port Angeles.
This Agreement has been authorized and approved by the City Council of the City of Port
Angeles, following a public hearing conducted in meeting in open session and pursuant to public
notice, on the day of March, 2006;
LOAN
The City agrees to lend to OlyCap, and OlyCap agrees to borrow from the City, $30,000 of the
funds identified above, all pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
TERMS
OlyCap, as borrower, agrees to repay the City, as lender, the full amount of the loan not later
than five (5) years from the date of the accompanying Promissory Note.
SECURITY
As security for borrowing said $30,000.00, OlyCAP shall make, execute and deliver to the City
a Promissory Note in the form and substance satisfactory to the City in full amount of the Loan.
LOAN PROCEEDS
Upon execution of the Note in favor of the City and the satisfaction of any other conditions
precedent applicable to loan disbursement, the loan proceeds will be disbursed in full to OlyCAP.
1
169
CANCELLATION OF COMMITMENT; ACCELERATION
.
(I) The entire principal ofthe Note shall become due and payable, at the option of the City,
upon the OlyCAP's breach of, or failure to comply with, any covenant,. agreement, term
or condition contained in this Agreement or upon the occurrence of the following:
(I) Failure to pay when due any sum owing hereunder, under OlyCAP's
Promissory Note.
LIMIT OF LIABILITY
The only liability and obligation of the City arising pursuant to this Loan Agreement is to advance
$30,00010an proceeds payment pursuant to this Agreement, and no creditor or other person or entity
of whatever nature shall have any recourse to the assets, credits, or services of the City by reason of
this Agreement
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
The terms ofthis Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their respective successors and
assigns;. it being agreed, however that the OlyCAP shall not assign or transfer any of its rights, duties,
benefits, obligations, liabilities or responsibilities under this Agreement without the express written
consent of the City.
.
RECORDS
OlyCAP agrees to maintain such records and follow such procedures as may be required
under the State's CDBG Program and any such procedures as the City or CTED may
prescribe. At a minimum, such records will include information pertaining to the'
Agreement, obligations and unobligated balances, assets and liabilities, outlays, equal
opportunity labor standards ( as appropriate), and performance.
OlyCAP shall retain all such records and all other records pertinent to this Agreement and
work undertaken under this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from and after the
construction of the dental clinic, unless a longer period is required to resolve audit findings
or litigation. In such cases, the City shall request a longer period of record retention.
The City, CTED, and duly-authorized officials ofthe state and federal government shall have
full access and the right to examine, excerpt or transcribe any pertinent documents, papers,
records, and books of OlyCAP involving transactions related to the Scope ofW ork and this
Agreement.
2
.
170
.
.
.
COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL LAWS
o lyCAP shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of the federal, state and
local governments.
HOLD HARMLESS
OlyCAP shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City harmless from and against any claim,
liability or loss arising from this agreement or from any act or failure to act by OlyCAP in
connection with the construction or operation of the dental clinic.
TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964
Under Title VI ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964, no person shall, on the grounds of race, color,
creed, religion, sex, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the
benefits of, or be subj ected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal
financial assistance.
INTEREST OF OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
No member of the governing body of the City or of OlyCAP, and no officer, employee, or
agent of the City or of OlyCAP who exercises any control or discretion in connection with
the planning or carrying out ofthe project, shall have any personal financial interest, direct or
indirect, in the project or in this Agreement; and OlyCAP shall also take appropriate steps to
assure compliance with the obligations of this paragraph.
APPLICABLE LAW AND VENUE
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. Venue for any
action hereunder shall be in Clallam County, Washington.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and OlyCAP have executed this Loan Agreement as of
the date and year last written below.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS
By:
By:
Title:
Title:
Date:
Date:
3
171
APROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Title:
Date:
G:\Legal_Backup\AGREEMENTS&CONTRACTh\2006 Agmts&Conlracts\OlyCapAgreement2-22-06.doc
4
172
.
.
.
.
.
.
PROMISSORY NOTE
Olympic Community Action Program
Amount: $30,000.00
Date:
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, The Olympic Community Action Program (OlyCAP), (herein called the
OLYCAP) promises to pay to the order of THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES (herein called the
LEND ER), the sum of thirty thousand ($30,000). Interest shall accrue from the date hereof at the rate
of zero percent (0%) per annum. .
Principal on this Note is payable in lawful money of the United States and the principal office of the
City of Port Angeles, Washington, or at such other place as shall be designated by the LENDER in
writing. On or before five (5) years from the date of this Promissory Note, the OlyCAP shall pay to
the Lender 100% of the balance of the Loan.
The OlyCAP reserves the right to prepay at any time all or any part of the principal amount due under
this Note without payment of penalties or premiums. All payments received on amounts due under
this note shall be applied to the principal due on the Note.
If the interest on, and principal due on, this Note are not paid in full not later than five (5) years from
the date of the Loan Agreement, the OlyCAP shall pay to the Lender a penalty of 1/2% per month on
the amount past due and remaining unpaid, per calendar month, or fraction thereof.
If suit is instituted by the Lender to recover on this Note, or any portion thereof, OlyCAP agrees to
pay all costs of such collection, including reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, and the OlyCAP
further agrees that venue and jurisdiction may be in Clallam County, Washington, at the Lender's
option. If this Note is reduced to judgment, such judgment shall bear the statutory interest rate on
judgments.
Demand, protest and notice of demand and protest are hereby waived, and the undersigned hereby
waives, to the extent authorized by law, any and all homestead and other exemption rights, which
would otherwise apply to the debt evidenced by this Note.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Note has been duly executed by the undersigned as of its date.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION
PROGRAMS
By:
By:
Title:
Date:
Title:
Date:
---------
--------------
----------
173
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
.
By:
Title:
Date: _
.
.
174
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
MARCH 7, 2006
CITY COUNCIL
MARK E. MAnSEN - CITY MANAGER
VALLEY CREEK PROPERTY ACQUISITION
Summary: In 2005 Council approved a purchase and sale agreement with Mr. John Ralston for the
purchase by the City of property in Valley Creek for the purpose of habitat restoration. The closing date
in that document was January 31,2006.
Recommendation: Approve amending the prior agreement to amend the closing date to not later
than A rill, 2006. Authorize Ci Mana er to si n a ro riate documents.
Background/Analysis: Part of the funding for this purchase was dependent upon Washington
State Department of Ecology approval to expend certain funds held in trust. That approval was
received by the City from DOE on February 23,2006. These funds must be spent within 120 days
from that date or be repaid to DOE.
Main Identi LAMOUREUX
From: "paul lamoureux" <paulrl@olypen.com>
To: "PAUL L." <paulrl@olypen.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 5:00 PM
...CITY COUNCIL COULD HAVE ADOPTED" I & R "6
MONTHS AGO...... ..AND CHOSE NOT TO.......
OVER 4,000 REGISTERED VOTERS DECIDED TO ADOPT
THE PETITION FORM OF " I & R " - and now, by law - have
instructed you (the City Council) to process that decision by
their petition as written and duly validated by the County
Auditor - with a legitimate Resolution. And, to publish a public
notice of that intent - which is required within 10 days. That
time period now has been passed - creating a legal problem
with you and state law.
The petition language is, by law, the language required by the
City Council to accept - as validated by the County Auditor -
and was - on February 16 - 22 I a questionable period of
"I I.t".t
ega I y ,I appears.... ...
Are there any questions for "clarification" that I can help you
with - prior to your passing of the appropriate (required)
resolution - as was noted on the agenda for (TONITE) ....
{ which obviously now is - - the Special Council meeting held
last week - for that purpose}..................
7~ ?f-
2>-/rOh
3/5/2006
(
\
refs Vole" "" ~
..
Legion Laughs
I
!
(
I
I" ,".',.,,- '",,",
,~... '. - .".. - ,,,, "'-,"-', ,;,
r
I
r \
I \
~~U6h "\
Gary Hemingway, American Legion 1 01 Historian, 10th District
Assistance: We need to all help
each other in our duties
. ~.:,<'t:7!::'~:.
.
.
.
CALL TO ORDER-
REGULAR MEETING:
ROLL CALL:
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE:
PRESENTATIONS,
CEREMONIAL
MATTERS &
PROCLAMATIONS:
Soroptimist International
Jet-Set Donation of Sani-
Can Rental for Waterfront
Trail
Proclamation in
Recognition of Ron Jones'
Induction into Washington
Music Educators
Association Hall of Fame
WORK SESSION:
Process for Filling Council
Vacancy
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
February 21, 2006
Mayor Rogers called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order at
6:00 p.m.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Staff Present:
Public Present:
Mayor Rogers, Deputy Mayor Williams, Councilmembers
Braun, Erickson, Munro, and Wharton.
None- one seat vacant.
Manager Madsen, Attorney Bloor, Clerk Upton, G. Cutler,
D. McKeen, T. Riepe, Y. Ziomkowski, T.Pierce, N. West,
P. Bartholick, S. McLain, B. Sterling, S. Johns, and B.
Coons.
M. Robin, L. Rotmark, P. Tietz, T. Ahlgren, V. & L.
Sproat, P. Lamoureux, J. Powell, J.Harmon, C. Kidd, and
D. Reed. All others present in the audience failed to sign
the roster.
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Councilmember Braun.
1. Soroptimist International Jet-Set Donation of San i-can Rentalfor Waterfront
Trail:
Public Works & Utilities Director Cutler introduced Ms. Marsha Robin, President of
Soroptimist International Jet-Set, who was joined by other Jet-Set members in
presenting a check for $1,060 for a Sani-canrental tobe used on the Waterfront Trail,
east of the Rayonier site. Ms. Robin advised the Council that the funds had been raised
by a Jet-Set raffle and, in its ongoing support of the Waterfront Trail, the club chose
to make this donation.
2. Proclamation in Recognition of Ron Jones ' Induction into Washington Music
Educators Association Hall of Fame:
Ron Jones, Port Angeles High School Music Teacher, was unable to attend this
evening's meeting, so the proclamation was deferred to the Council meeting of March
7, 2006.
1.
Process for Filling Council Vacancy:
Mayor Rogers provided a summary of requirements and eligibility criteria for filling
the vacancy on the City Council. She recommended that the Council seek letters of
interest up to February 28, 2006, and that a subcommittee comprised of
Councilmembers Braun and Munro be established to review the letters and submit a
recommendation to the Council as to the process to be followed. Mayor Rogers
stressed the importance of having an expeditious and fair process. Councilmember
Williams moved to approve the recommendation as submitted for the process to
175
- I -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 21,2006
WORK SESSION:
(Cont'd)
Process for Filling Council
Vacancy (Cont'd)
Initiative & Referendum
Process
LATE ITEMS TO BE
PLACED ON THIS OR
FUTURE AGENDAS &
PUBLIC COMMENT:
CITY COUNCIL
COMMITTEE
REPORTS:
ORDINANCES NOT
REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
Rolling Hills Subdivision
Final Approval
Ordinance No. 3236
be followed in filling the vacant position. Councilmember Munro seconded the
motion. Discussion followed, and the suggestion was made that more time should be
allowed to receive letters of interest. Therefore, Councilmember Williams amended
the motion to receive letters of interest through March 7, 2006, with an
appointment to be considered at the March 21"1 City Council meeting.
Councilmember Munro, as seconder of the motion, agreed to the amendment.
Attorney Bloor advised the Council there is no requirement to interview candidates;
however, if interviews are conducted, they must be done by the entire City Council.
A vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
2.
Initiative & Referendum Process:
Mayor Rogers advised those present that the City has not received a signed, official
letter from the Auditor's Office as to validation of petitions submitted on the initiative
and referendum process. She indicated the City cannot take legislative action based on
an e-mail, adding that the City Council takes this matter very seriously and will do
everything according to the law. The Mayor indicated the matter would be addressed
after the receipt of the official letter from the County Auditor and after appropriate
notification has been given to the public. She anticipated the likely date the initiative
and referendum process could be addressed would be at the special City Council
meeting being projected for February 28th.
Attorney Bloor advised the Council that the City had received a sample resolution from
a group of citizens and, earlier this evening, he received a phone call from the group's
legal counsel indicating the desire to change the draft resolution somewhat. Therefore,
the City has two different proposals from the group at this time, and Attorney Bloor
indicated he hadn't reviewed the second proposal. He indicated the City would be
writing its own resolution, and it is unknown if portions will be taken from the sample
resolutions.
Manager Madsen added a loan agreement with the Clallam County Housing Authority
as Finance Agenda Item J.5., as well as Benefits and Hiring Tools as Finance Agenda
Item J.6.
Leonard Rasmussen, 2133 W. 14th Street, distributed and read into the record a letter
he had given the Council with regard to his service on the Planning Commission.
Councilmember Braun lauded Mr. Rasmussen's service for the past four years.
Paul Lamoureux, 602 Whidby, stated his appreciation for the clarification provided
regarding the initiative and referendum process, as well as recent changes made to the
City Council agenda.
Mayor Rogers read letters received from Port Angeles Hardwood and the Port of Port
Angeles, both of which expressed appreciation to the staffmembers from Public Works
& Utilities, as well as the Police Department, for services provided.
Rolling Hills Subdivision Final Approval:
Associate Planner Johns presented a summary of the Rolling Hills 28-unitsubdivision,
noting the Council was being asked to waive the second reading of the Ordinance.
Following brief discussion as to the need to taken action expeditiously,
Councilmember Braun moved to waive the second reading of the Ordinance.
Councilmember Munro seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
I
I
I.
.
Councilmember Williams disclosed that he is a realtor, but without any interest in the .
property and with no transactions pending. Mayor Rogers disclosed that her husband
is a realtor, also with no interest in the property. No one in the audience said that
Councilmember Williams or Mayor Rogers should be disqualified from the considera-
176
- 2-
.
.
.
0:\,Y r~ ~
<. .:, ,0' },.: ' "~
~:',j::',:"\ia:':"l
'1~J,.~I~~:: .
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 21,2006
ORDINANCES NOT
REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
(Cont'd)
tion. Public Works & Utilities Director Cutler provided clarification of the Assignment
of Savings. Mayor Rogers then read the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 3236
Rolling Hills Subdivision
Final Approval
Ordinance No. 3236
(Cont'd)
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, approving
the Rolling Hills Subdivision.
Councilmember Braun moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title, citing
Condition 1, Findings 1 - 20, and Conclusions 1 - 5. Councilmember Munro
seconded the motion. Brief discussion followed as to what could conceivably happen
if the developer failed to complete the project; staff provided clarification regarding
some unfinished items due to the winter season. Attorney Bloor. clarified that
appearance. of fairness is carried through fro;m preliminary approval through final
approval. A vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
RESOLUTIONS:
Set Date for Consideration of Street Vacation Petition - STV 06-01 -
Anderson, Portion of "P" and 1 &h Streets South of Milwaukee Drive:
L
Set Date for Consideration
of Street Vacation Petition -
Anderson
Resolution No. 3-06
Planner West stated that a public hearing will be set for April 4, 2006. Councilmember
Williams added that the Real Estate Committee had recommended approval of the
street vacation. Mayor Rogers read the Resolution by title, entitled
RESOLUTION NO. 3-06
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, setting a hearing date for April 4th on a petition to
vacate a portion of "P" Street and a portion of 16th Street in
Port Angeles, ClalIam County, Washington.
Councilmember Munro moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. The motion
was seconded by Councilmember Braun and carried unanimously.
Set Date for Consideration
of Street Vacation Petition -
Lunderville
Resolution No. 4-06
2. Set Date for Consideration of Street Vacation Petition - STV 05-04 -
Lunderville, Portion of "F" Street South of 12th Street:
Planner West indicated this public hearing will be set for April 18, 2006, and
Councilmember Williams indicated the ReaIEstate Committee is also recommending
approval of this street vacation. Mayor Rogers read the Resolution by title, entitled
RESOLUTION NO. 4-06
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, setting a hearing date for April18thto vacate a
portion of 12th & "F" Street in Port Angeles, Clallam County,
Washington.
Councilmember Wharton moved to pass the Resolution as read by title.
Councilmember Munro seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Surplus of Personal
Property
Resolution No. 5-06
3. Surplus of Personal Property:
Finance Director Ziomkowski summarized information relative to the surplus of
computer equipment. Mayor Rogers read the Resolution by title, entitled
177
- 3-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 21,2006
Surplus of Personal
Property
Resolution No. 5-06
(Cont'd)
OTHER
CONSIDERATIONS:
2006 - 2008 Labor Contract
with AFSCME
CSO Funding Options
Break
Green Crow Planned
Residential Development -
Campbell Avenue -
Preliminary Approval
RESOLUTION NO. 5-06
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles,
Washingtop., declaring various computer equipment surplus
property, ~d authorizing disposal of the same.
.
Councilmember Williams moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. The
motion was seconded'by Councilmember Braun and carried unanimously.
1.
2006 - 2008 Labor Contract with AFSCME:
Human Resources Man~ger Coons presented and reviewed highlights of the proposed
contract with AFSC~for 2006-2008. Councilmember Braun moved to approve
the labor contract bet.ween the City of Port Angeles and AFSCME Local #1619,
covering the period9fJ,anuary 1, 2006 through December 31,2008, and authorize
the Mayor to sign the contract. The motion was seconded by Councilmember
Wharton and carried unanimously.
2.
CSO Funding Options:
Director Cutler advised the Council there are various funding sources available for
capital projects required under the Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Reductiop Plan,
and he reviewed funding possibilities through the Washington State Public Works Trust
Fund (PWTF). He recommended approval of the submission of certain loan
applications, an action supported by the Utility Advisory Committee. Following brief
discussion, Councilme~ber Wharton moved to authorize the Mayor to 1) sign a
PWTF Pre-Construct!on Loan Application certification, in an amount not to
exceed 5600,000; and .2) sign a PWTF Construction Loan Application
certification, in an a~ount not to exceed 53,000,000 and, if either or both loans .
are approved, to authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement(s).
Councilmember Ericl<Son seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Mayor Rogers recessed the meeting for a break at 6:58 p.m. The meeting reconvened
at 7:12 p.rn.
3. Green Crow Planned Residential Development - Campbell Avenue -
Preliminary Approval:
Mayor Rogers announced this is a quasi-judicial process, and she posed questions to
the Councilmembers on appearance of fairness issues and their ability to hear the matter
in an objective manner. Councilmember Wharton disclosed that, while campaigning
for office, she door belled in that neighborhood and discussed the area's drainage.
Councilmember Williams stated he is a realtor, but has no transactions for this
particular property. Mayor Rogers disclosed her husband is a realtor, and she then
asked if any member of the audience wished to have a Councilmember disqualified
from the consideration.
Jack Harmon, a Port Angeles resident, stated he was not aware of this particular PRD,
but he felt he had ?een remiss on a prior PRD consideration by not stating that any
Councilmembers who could be selling property in the future from that PRD should
recuse themselves from the proceedings. He asked Mayor Rogers and Councilmember
Williams to recuse themselves from the Green Crow discussion. Attorney Bloor
offered clarification in that it would be at the individual Councilmember's discretion
as to whether the matter could be heard impartially, as the reason cited by Mr. Harmon
was insufficient to disqualify Mayor Rogers and Councilmember Williams, because .
there is no transaction pending. Councilmember Williams shared his personal
philosophy on the expertise he brings to the consideration, feeling he would be
impartial. Discussion followed among the Councilmembers and with Mr. Harmon;
178
-4-
!n_______
.
.
.
Green Crow Planned
Residential Development -
Campbell Avenue-
Preliminary Approval
(Cont'd)
Municipal Code
Amendment to Section
17.96 Appeals and Section
15.12 Flood Damage
Prevention
" ;t,.".
{~~.,;'"
^~'~J},L:."
'~ ,~~:~ ':'A:;':~;:
;..' ; pO,
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 21,2006
Mayor Rogers andi~gUhcilmember Williams remained for the consideration.
Tim Woolett, for the applicant, felt that people are elected to office when the voters
know their backgrounds. He asked that they continue in the discussion, but remain
alert to the issue.
Associate Planner Johns presented maps showing the location of the Green Crow
Planned Residential Development, involving a 43-lot subdivision on an 18.93 acre site,
with 39 single-family residential lots and 5 multi-family lots for a potential of 74
dwelling units. He noted the 2+ acre park dedicated to the City, the three small
wetlands on site, and the fact that the applicant had met the open space requirement that
would include a park of more than five acres for recreational space under the power
lines and in buffers around the wetlands. Mr. Johns discussed improvements to Rook
Drive and Campbell A venue, noting that the City would improve a portion of Campbell
Avenue out to Mt. Angeles Road. He further discussed the density allowed in the area.
The Council held discussion on the dedication of the park, whether the City would be
responsible for maintenance and operation, utility improvements, integration with
adjoining streets, dedication of rights-of-way, possible traffic calming devices, speed
limits, plans for a homeowners association, traffic flows, wetlands maintenance, and
drainage.
Tim W oolett, representing the applicant, Green Crow, addressed the wetland mitigation
plan, anticipated covenants and restrictions, traffic impacts, support for a 20 mph speed
limit, and the fact that the project didn't reach the maximum allowable density. Mr.
Woolett discussed the 50' right-of-way, with 30' used for the street, asking the City to
maintain the street as if it were a 60' right of way. Manager Madsen suggested this
matter could be deferred to final approval. Discussion ensued on the issue of a 50'
private road versus a 60' public road, as well as the intent of the Developer's
Agreement entered into between the City and Green Crow, which is silent on public vs.
private roads. Dennis Yakovich, Green Crow, stated his involvement in the
negotiations of the Developer's Agreement, noting the intent was to have all public
streets. He felt the issue couldn't be deferred to final approval, because the roads
would have been installed by that time. Lengthy discussion ensued on matters related
to drainage and drainage standards, traffic impacts on Rook Drive out to Campbell
Avenue, and improvements to Campbell Avenue in the vicinity of the park. Mr.
Yakovich returned to the podium and stated Green Crow's generosity in providing a
larger park and, for that reason, he felt Green Crow shouldn't be required to improve
Campbell Avenue contiguous to the park. He added that, if the City required those
street improvements, then he would do a redesign with added lots. Further clarification
was provided by staff, after which Mayor Rogers identified the two issues needing
resolution: improvements to Campbell Avenue and the 50' public versus private right-
of-way. It was agreed that further clarification was needed from staff.
Councilmember Braun moved to continue the Green Crow Planned Residential
Development to the special City Council meeting that is anticipated to be held on
February 28, 2006. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Erickson and
carried unanimously.
4. Municipal Code Amendment to Section 17.96 Appeals and Section 15.12
Flood Damage Prevention:
Planner West informed the Council of the two components of the Municipal Code
needing amendment, one related to flood prevention that was deemed deficient
according to the Department of Ecology, and the other related to an error in the
notification upon appeal. He indicated this would constitute the first reading of both
Ordinances. Mayor Rogers read the Ordinances by title, entitled
179
- 5 -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 21,2006
Municipal Code
Amendment to Section
17.96 Appeals and Section
15.12 Flood Damage
Prevention (Cont'd)
PUBLIC HEARINGS -
QUASI-JUDICIAL:
PUBLIC HEARINGS -
OTHER:
FINANCE:
Nippon Maintenance
Agreement
Loan Agreement with
Housing Authority of
Clallam County (HACC)
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, amending
a portion of Title 15, as it relates to Flood Damage Prevention, of
the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, amending
a portion of the Zoning Code, Title 17, of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code.
The Ordinances will be brought before the City Council for adoption at its meeting of
March 7,2006.
None.
None.
1.
Nippon Maintenance Agreement:
Director Cutler advised the Council that, due to the forthcoming completion of
confi'guration alterations to transmission interconnections between the dams, PUD
substations, and the Nippon Paper Industries' mill, the entire transmission system
supporting the mill will be inside the City. The proposed. agreement will provide for
maintenance services for these .electric transmission.lines. The Utility Advisory
Corimrittee recommended approval of the agreement once the reconfiguration takes .
place. Councilmember Munro moved to authorize the Public Works & Utilities
Director to sign an agreement with Nippon Paper Industries USA Co. Ltd., for
maintenance services for NPl's electric transmission line system within the City
limits. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Braun and carried
unanimously.
2. Loan Agreement with Housing Authority ofClaUam County (HACC):
Manager Madsen introduced a proposed loan agreement with the Housing Authority
of Clallam County to assist the HACC with the purchase of a 2.02 acre parcel of
property inside the City to help meet future affordable housing development needs.
The Housing Authority would like to purchase RMD zoned property on 18th Street with
CDBG funds at this time because of increasing property prices.
Pam Tietz, Executive Director of the Housing Authority, advised the Council oflimited
property that is available for medium and high density development. The Housing
Authority could potentially develop up to 25 units with a zero interest loan from the
City.
Manager Madsen reviewed CDBG funds currently available, indicating the Finance
Corimrittee had recommended approval of the loan. Brief discussion followed, after
which Councilmember Munro moved to authorize the Mayor to sign a loan
agreement for the Port Angeles housing rehabilitation program revolving loan
funds in the amount of $95,000 to HACC for purchase of property for
development of affordable housing. Councilmember Braun seconded the motion,
which carried unanimously. ~
.
180
-6-
.
.
.
Brown & Caldwell
Consultant Agreement
Equipment Purchase -
Police Vehicles
Erickson Park Restrooms
Benefits and Hiring Tools
CONSENT AGENDA:
INFORMATION:
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
3.
ConsuhantAgreemen~
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 21,2006
Director CUtler. summarized the agreement with Brown & Caldwell for engineering
services related to the City's wastewater and stormwater systems, and he. detailed the
various tasks to be completed. Councilmember Braun moved to approve and
authorize the Mayor to sign an Agreement for Professional Services with Brown
& Caldwell, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $850,000. Councilmember Williams
seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
4.
Equipment Purchase -Police Vehicles:
Director CUtler reviewed the budgeted purchase of one marked patrol vehicle, one
marked K9 vehicle, two unmarked patrol vehicles, and one 4x4 pickup truck for the
Police Department. Councilmember Munro moved to authorize the City Manager
to sign contracts and. purchase orders for two Crown Victoria sedans, two
Chevrolet Impala sedans, and one Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 extended cab pickup
truck from the state bid contracts. The motion was seconded by Councilmember
Braun and carried unanimously.
5.
Erickson Park Restrooms:
Director Cutler provided a summary of research conducted to purchase outdoor
restroom facilities for placement at Erickson Park. The types and associated costs were
reviewed, and the Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission supported the
purchase of a pre-cast restroom. Councilmember Erickson moved to approve and
authorize the City Manager to purchase a pre-cast restroom in the amount of
$98,477.00, including sales tax, manufactured by CXT of Spokane, W A, utilizing
the state bid contract. Also, it is recommended that additional funding in the
amount of $25,000 be allocated from the Governmental Fund for capital facilities
projects to complete the project. The motion was seconded by Councilmember
Wharton and carried unanimously.
6.
Benefits and Hiring Tools:
Attorney Bloor referenced the City Council's prior approval. of a statement of Goals,
Policies, Benefits, and Hiring Tools. Staff subsequently learned that Section 2 of the
Benefits .. could not be implemented as written, so it would be appropriate for the
Council to amend the statement by deleting the portion of the last sentence that required
payment to a Flex 125 Plan. Councilmember Munro moved to adopt amended
Exhibit B. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Wharton and carried
unanimously.
Councilmember Braun moved to accept the Consent Agenda, to include: 1.) City
Council Minutes of February 7,2006, regular meeting and February 11,2006, special
meeting; 2.) Expenditure Approval List- February 15, 2006 - $804,865.45; 3.) Tree
Trimming Contract; and 4.) Special City Council Meeting of February 28,2006, to
Interview Applicants and Make Appointments to City Boards and Commissions. The
motion was seconded by Councilmember Wharton and carried unanimously.
None.
Based on input from Attorney Bloor, Mayor Rogers announced the need for an
Executive Session for approximately 1 Y2 hours under the authority of RCW
42.30.110(1)(i), litigation, and RCW 42.30.110(1)(b), real estate. No action was
anticipated. The Executive Sess,ion convened at 9:40 p.m. and, at 10:50p.m, the
Executive Session was extended for an additional 40 minutes by announcement of the
Mayor.
181
- 7-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 21,2006
RETURN TO OPEN
SESSION:
The Executive Session concluded at 11 :30 p.m, and the Council convened inregular
open session. No action was taken.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 11 :30 p.m
Karen A. Rogers, Mayor
182
- 8 -
.
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
.
.
.
.
.
CALL TO ORDER-
SPECIAL MEETING:
ROLL CALL:
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE:
RESOLUTIONS:
Initiative and Referendum
Process
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
February 28, 2006
Mayor Rogers called the special meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order at
6:00 p.m.
Members Present:
Mayor Rogers, Deputy Mayor Williams, Councilmembers
Braun, Erickson, and Wharton.
Members Absent:
Councilmember Munro and one seat vacant.
Staff Present:
Manager Madsen, Attorney Bloor, Clerk Upton, G. Cutler;
S. Roberds, S. Johns, N. West, and P. Bartholick.
Public Present:
T. Jennings,P. Ripley,P. Lamoureux, V. Sproat, B. Pierce,
C. Rector, L. Sproat, C. Kidd, M. Langley, and J. Powell.
All others present in the audience failed to sign the roster.
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Councilmember Erickson.
Initiative and Referendum Process:
Attorney Bloor distributed a memorandum to the City Council on the matter of an
Initiative and Referendum resolution. He explained that the County Auditor had
certified the initiative and referendum petition that was filed with the City as being
sufficient. The City Council is, therefore, obligated to pass a resolution declaring an
intent to adopt the powers of initiative and referendum. Attorney Bloor indicated that
he had prepared a draft resolution, a local representative of the petitioners had prepared
a draft resolution, and the petition sponsor's legal counsel had prepared yet another
resolution to take before the Council.
Attorney Bloor related that the language in the resolutions provided by the sponsor's
attorney seemed to vary from State law in terms of how cities can act with the initiative
and referendum process. It appeared that those draft resolutions asked the City to adopt
expanded powers beyond those adopted by other Code cities. He said that no city is
a sovereign government, and it is bound by State law. The City Council could not
legally adopt powers outside those granted by State law, which holds true even if the
City has a petition signed by many citizens. He felt it would be warranted to defer the
matter to the March 21, 2006, City Council meeting, at which time further information
and clarification could be provided to the Council. It was agreed that the group's legal
counsel would be welcome to address the draft resolutions he provided for
consideration. Councilmember Erickson moved to schedule. the City Council
meeting of March 21, 2006, to consider information regarding the different
resolutions on the initiative and referendum process. Councilmember Braun
seconded the motion. Discussion ensued, and Attorney Bloor provided further
clarification and indicated he would be asking for independent views of the resolutions.
He added that the other resolutions do not address exclusions from referendum and
initiative applicable to Code cities, and they do not address exclusions established by
the courts in case law. A vote was taken on the motion, which carried
unanimously.
183
- 1 -
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
February 28, 2006
OTHER
CONSIDERATIONS:
Campbell A venue PRD
Break
Interviews/Appointments -
Planning Commission,
Civil Service Commission,
and Utility Advisory
Committee
EXECUTIVE
SESSION:
RETURN TO OPEN
SESSION:
Interviews/Appointments -
Planning Commission,
Civil Service Commission,
and Utility Advisory
Committee (Cont'd)
1.
Campbell Avenue PRD:
Mayor Rogers referenced a letter just received from Green Crow requesting a .
continuation of the consideration on the PRD and subdivision. Manager Madsen
indicated the issue had been continued from the last Council meeting because of two
unresolved issues. Because of schedule conflicts, the City and the developer were
unable to meet to further discuss the issues. He indicated the matter is on the record
and is subject to preliminary approval, which can proceed with modifications
introduced through the process to final approval. Continuation of the matter would be
at the pleasure of the City Council.
Dennis Yakovich, Green Crow, noted the schedule conflicts and expressed the hope
that he and his staff could meet with the City staff to discuss the issues needing
resolution. He indicated that Green Crow may need to consider a redesign for
consideration at a later date.
Councilmember Erickson moved to continue the PRD / Subdivision to the March
21, 2006, City Council meeting. Councilmember Wharton seconded the motion.
Following further discussion as to the issues needing resolution, a vote was taken on
the motion, which carried unanimously.
Mayor Rogers recessed the meeting for a break at 6:36 p.m. The meeting reconvened
at 6:48 p.m
2. Interviews/Appointments - Planning Commission, Civil Service Commission,
and Utility Advisory Committee:
The City Council interviewed the following candidates for the Planning Commission:
Peter Ripley, Stanley Harris, Wemer Beier, Michael "Doc" Reiss, Randall McCoy, and
Jack Powell. Upon completion of the interviews, the Councilmembers felt it would be
helpful to adjourn to Executive Session to evaluate the qualifications of the candidates.
.
Mayor Rogers adjourned the meeting to Executive Session for approximately one-half
hour under the authority ofRCW 42.30.110(h). The Executive Session convened at
8:20 p.m '
The Executive Session concluded at 8:48 p.m, and the Council convened in regular
open session.
2. Interviews/Appointments - Planning Commission, Civil Service Commission,
and Utility Advisory Committee (Cont'd):
At the request of the Mayor, the Council deliberated on appointments to the Planning
Commission. Clerk Upton conducted a roll call vote for the Planning Commission
appointments, with the Councilmembers stating theirfrrst and second choices in order.
Councilmember Wharton cast votes for Randall McCoy and Wemer Beier; Mayor
Rogers cast votes for Stanley Harris and Wemer Beier; Councilmember Williams cast
votes for Stanley Harris and "Doc" Reiss; Councilmember Braun cast votes for Stanley
Harris and "Doc" Reiss; and Councilmember Erickson cast votes for Stanley Harris and
Wemer Beier. Stanley Harris received four votes, Wemer Beier received three votes,
"Doc" Reiss received two votes, and Randall McCoy received one vote. Therefore,
Stanley Harris was appointed to the Planning Commission for the unexpired term
ending February 29, 2008, and Werner Beier was appointed for the term, March
1,2006 - February 28, 2010.
.
184
- 2-
.
.
.
~'"!!'fr:;"'-" ~.:<:. ,', i.' 't;L~hSi.:iI1'lt~r'-:{ 'j/!ff1.\\$ 'i,~'/'~~F,:;~;',
Interviews/Appointments -
Planning Commission,
Civil Service Commission,
and Utility Advisory
Committee (Cont'd)
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
February 28, 2006
The Council considered the vacancy on the Civil Service Conumssion.
Councilmember Erickson moved to appoint Glenn Wiggins to the Civil Service
Commission for the term, March 1, 2006 - February 28, 2010.
The Council then considered the vacancy on the Utility Advisory Conumttee.
Originally, there were two applicants; however, one of the applicants Withdrew his
application earlier in the day. Councilmember Erickson moved to appoint Orville
Campbell to the Utility Advisory Committee for the term, March 1, 2006 -
February 28,2010. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Braun and
carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 9:01 p.m.
Karen A. Rogers, Mayor
185
- 3-
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
.
.
.
186
. Vendor
BLAZE CONE COMPANY INC
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
GALLS INCORPORATED
HEPBURN SUPERIOR
JOSHUA BENNETT
Just Dolls of Washington
POSITIVE PROMOTIONS
SUSPENDED AQUATIC MENTOR INC
. WA STATE PATROL - WASIS
ADVANCED TRAVEL
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
Karen Rogers
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
Legislative
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
.
RICK'S PLACE
~ ~-~...;, i...{, ~.;:-~.?;,.~t;" ~',_'.: "-,I!,-,,: " ..... ,. _'"""..... ~..."""'.'*...':- ~ . .<'. :'- '.'<<.
Date: 2/27/2006
CityofPort Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006 To: 2/24/2006
Description Account Number Invoice Amount
Reflective bands,glue 001-0000-237.00-00 -30.26
Office supplies,Lego toy 001-0000-237.00-00 -3.51
Training materials 001-0000-237.00-00 -22.80
Books,pamphlets 001-0000-237.00-00 -14.69
Person searches 001-0000-237.00-00 -2.43
Medical,FirstAid supplies 001-0000-237.00-00 -68.94
Heart Decorations 001-0000-237.00-00 -10.93
Counterfeit detector 001-0000-237.00-00 -11.41
Pistol parts 001-0000-237.00-00 -25.40
Camera 001-0000-237.00-00 -28.95
Patrol sling 001-0000-237.00-00 -2.80
VARIOUS PROCEEDS DUE 001-0000-225.40-1 0 1,373.20
CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-0000-237.00-00 -8.28
CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-0000-237.00-00 -4.22
MET ALS,BARS,PLA TES,RODS 001-0000-237.00-00 -22.44
Rtd electronic prints 001-0000-229.50-00 54.00
DEPOSIT REFUND 001-0000-239.10-00 60.00
Junior FF items 001-0000-237.00-00 -41.12
Basketball,volleyball set 001-0000-237.00-00 -116.20
Criminal history-Brown 001-0000-229.50-00 24.00
Division Total: $1,096.82
Department Total: $1,096.82
AWC Leg Cont-Pittis 001-1160-511.43-10 263.98
WA DC trip-Rogers 001-1160-511.43-10 1,639.24
Cont Registration-Wharton 001-1160-511.43-10 85.00
Travel expenses-KR,LW 001-1160-511.43-10 329.11
ROGERS AIRFARE TO DC 001-1160~511.43-1 0 607.60
Business cards 001-1160-511.31-01 89.84
CC BINDERS,DIVIDERS 001-1160-511.31-01 159.97
DIVIDERS 001-1160-511.31-01 19.67
Mayor & Council Division Total: $3,194.41
Legislative Department Total: $3,194.41
Travel expense-Madsen 001-1210..;513.43-10 389.90
Business cards 001-1210-513.31-01 29.94
2 SIZE LABELS 001-1210-513.31-01 41.48
DATE STAMP UPDATE 001-1210-513.31-01 43.27
Office supplies 001-1210-513.31-01 84.98
PRINTER TONER 001-1210-513.31-01 107.21
FAX & TONER 001-1210-513.31-60 482.42
CM COPIER CONTRACT 001-1210-513.48-10 32.49
December copier lease 001-1210-513.48-10 32.49
CPI TECH CLUSTER MTG 001-1210-513.31-01 21.55
187
Page 1
Date: 2/27/2006
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006
To: 2/24/2006
Qwest Settlement-GFund 001-2001-311.10-00
Finance Revenues Division Total:
Conf registration- YZ 001-2010-514.43-10
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2010-514.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2010-514.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2010-514.31-01
PUGET SOUND FINANCE OFFICERS ASStZIOMKOWSKI MEMBERSHIP 001-2010-514.49-01
RICK'S PLACE FINANCE COMM DINNER MTG 001-2010-514.31-01
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 001-2010-514.31-01
WASHINGTON (015), STATE OF January Scan charges 001-2010-514.42-10
Finance Department Finance Administration Division Total:
GOVT FINANCE OFFCRS ASSN GFOA BUDGET AWARD 001-2023-514.41-50
MICROFLEX INC Tax audit program-2005 001-2023-514.41-50
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC Business cards 001-2023-514.31-01
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2023-514.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2023-514.31-01
January shipping charges 001-2023-514.42-10
January Scan charges 001-2023-514.42-10
Accounting Division Total:
CYCLES 1-5 2/2/06 001-2025-514.41-50
CYCLES 6-10 2/9/06 001-2025-514.41-50
ON-CALL SERVICES 001-2025-514.41-50
Business cards 001-2025-514.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2025-514.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2025-514.31-01
COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPF 001-2025-514.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2025-514.31-01
RADIX CORPORATION MAINTENANCE MAR 06 001-2025-514.48-10
VERIZON WIRELESS 02-09 alc 47024274400001 001-2025-514.42-10
WA MUNICIPAL TREASURER'S ASSN-WM EMERY 2006 DUES 001-2025-514.49-01
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF January Scan charges 001-2025-514.42-10
Finance Department Customer Service Division Total:
AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY PAPER (OFFICE,PRINT SHOP) 001-2080-514.31-01
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE January shipping charges 001-2080-514.42-10
188
Vendor
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
City Manager Department
ONE GROUP LLC
City Manager Department
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
City Manager Department
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
City Manager Department
CLALLAM CNTY TREASURER
Finance Department
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
WASHINGTON (015), STATE OF
Finance Department
DATABARINCORPORATED
EXPRESS PERSONNEL SERVICES
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
Description
January Scan charges
City Manager Office
COUNCL RETREAT & PREP.
Customer Commitment
January Scan charges
Human Resources
January Scan charges
City Clerk
City Manager Department
Account Number
001-1210-513.42-10
Division Total:
001-1211-513.41-50
Division Total:
001-1220-516.42-10
Division Total:
001-1230-514.42-10
Division Total:
Department Total:
Invoice Amount
66.40
$1,332.13
1,500.00
$1,500.00
12.95
$12.95
7.66
$7.66
$2,852.74
18,236.79
$18,236.79
310.00
42.01
63.96
4.98
50.00
72.20
5.92
13.18
$562.25
385.00
539.17
29.95
40.94
146.53
41.38
10.52
$1,193.49
1,697.50
2,161.31
1,115.49
29.94
20.48
57.36
107.21
27.08
192.77
181.80
30.00
6.30
$5,627.24
272.08
45.00
.
.
.
Page 2
(i~~'<.
.ha
'll....~
'iI ,~.,.:'"
.vendor
XEROX CORPORATION
Finance Department
.r';"~~r";;>Y~{~"i.:0-<'14" . 78 .~i,~~..",lt~;>t,,~;t,!>'i'r- ',4f~
City: of,1~ort Angeles
City CountU'Expenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006
To: 2/24/2006
Description Account Number
WCP416C3lease-Dec 001-2080-514.45-30
Reprographics Division Total:
Finance Department Department Total:
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF January Scan charges 001-3010-515.42-10
WEST GROUP ONLINE LEGAL RESEARCH 001-3010-515.31-01
Attorney Attorney Office Division Total:
CLALLAM CNTY DEPT OF HEALTH JAN.MEDICAL BILLING 001-3012-598.51-23
CLALLAM CNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT JANUARY JAIL BILL 001-3012-598.51-23
QWEST360-417-3095 ELEC HOME MONITOR-STEPHAN 001-3012-598.51-23
Attorney Jail Contributions Division Total:
BLACK STROHMEYER & MORTENSEN PS DEFENSE ATTY PCR11409 001-3021-515.50-90
CAMERON, PAMELA CONTRACT ATTY-JANUARY 001-3021-515.41-50
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Dictaphone Ear Piece 001-3021-515.31-01
PAUL MINH TU INTERPRETER-PCR11867 001-3021-515.50-90
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF January Scan charges 001-3021-515.42-10
WEST GROUP ONLINE LEGAL RESEARCH 001-3021-515.31-01
Attorney Prosecution Division Total:
Attorney Department Total:
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
. COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC
LENOVO
QL YMPIC PRINTERS INC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS
.
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Community Deve/opmt Dept
ICC-OL YMPIC PENINSULA CHAPTER
FRONT COUNTER REMODEL 001-4010-558.48-10
Books,pamphlets 001-4010-558.31-01
COUNTER REMODEL 001-4010-558.48-10
COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPH 001-4010-558.31-60
Business cards 001-4010-558.31-01
COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPF 001-401 0-558.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-4010-558.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-4010-558.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-4010-558.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-4010-558.31-01
COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPF 001-401 0-558.31-01
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10
COMMUNICA TIONSIMEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV001-401 0-558.44-1 0
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10
January Scan charges 001-4010-558.42-10
Planning Division Total:
MEMBERSHIP DUES 001-4020-524.49-01
189
Date: 2/27/2006
Invoice Amount
138.94
$456.02
$26,075.79
2.98
247.60
$250.58
631.51
17,182.18
20.62
$17,834.31
108.00
783.33
30.11
60.00
2.10
247.60
$1,231.14
$19,316.03
71.14
191.68
27.46
2,024.01
29.95
48.72
46.25
7.88
-9.66
9.75
204.19
62.70
49.40
57.00
59.85
57.00
58.90
60.80
62.70
52.25
65.55
13.91
$3,251.43
15.00
Page 3
Date: 2/27/2006
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006 To: 2/24/2006
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
KEYRIFFIC KEYS CORP KEYS 0014020-524.41-50 19.06
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC Business cards 001-4020-524.31-01 59.89
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 0014020-524.31-01 89.60
Community Deve/opmt Dept Building Division Total: $183.55
Community Developmt Dept Department Total: $3,434.98
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Heart Decorations 001-5010-521.31-01 142.67
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC INVITES AWARD NIGHT 1-12- 001-5010-521.31-01 22.11
Paper,card stock 001-5010-521.31-01 1.84
ORBIT ONE COMMUNICATIONS 01-31 alc 10428.28 001-5010-521.42-10 36.95
PORT ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT Supplies 001-5010-521.31-01 99.72
QUILL CORPORATION OFFICE S~PPLlES, GENERAL 001-5010-521.31-01 27.25
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF January Scan charges 001-5010-521.42-10 43.80
Police.. Department Administration Division Total: $374.34
CAMERA CORNER DEVELOP 4 ROLLS FILM 001-5021-521.49-90 30.11
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Camera 001-5021-521.31-01 377.74
Person searches 001-5021-521.42-10 31.68
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF January Scan charges 001-5021-521.42-10 75.95
Police Department Investigation Division Total: $515.48
AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY 4 OZ PURELL HAND SANITIZE 001-5022-521.31-01 70.04
POLICE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 001-5022-521.31-01 23.19
POLICE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 001-5022,.521.31-01 43.06
POLICE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 001-5022-521.31-01 -7.82
POLICE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 001-5022-521.31-01 30.16
BLAZE CONE COMPANY INC Reflective bands,glue 001-5022-521.31-01 394.76
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Medical,FirstAid supplies 001-5022-521.31-01 899.59
Counterfeit detector 001-5022-521.31-01 148.91
Pistol parts 001-5022-521.31-01 331.40
Patrol sling 001-5022-521.31-01 36.56
Holsters 001-5022-521.31-80 164.18
COPY CAT GRAPHICS GRAPHICS 441,449,450,218 001-5022-521.20-80 69.31
DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 130431 Z-15 SMD 001-5022-521.41-50 115.89
130432 K35907 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
130433 PYT 320 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
130434 PYT 492 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
130435 PYT 4 72 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
130436 PYT 469 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
130437 PYT018 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
130438 PYT 463 001-5022-521 .41-50 86.64
130439 PTY062 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
130440 PYT 462 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
130442 5083 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
130443 KE5893 001-5022-521 .41-50 86.64
190
.
.
.
Page 4
CitY ()f Port Angeles
City Comicil Expenditure. Report
Date: 2/27/2006
From: 2/11/2006
To: 2/24/2006
. Vendor
DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS...
GALLS INCORPORATED
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PACIFIC TACTICAL INC
PEN PRINT INC
PORT ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
QUILL CORPORATION
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Police Department
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PORT ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
QUILL CORPORATION
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Police Department
ANGELES COMMUNICATIONS INC
Police Department
AM SAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY
MIKE SANDERS
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
. PORT ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Description Account Number Invoice Amount
130444 KE5892 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
130445 277 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
130446 107 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
1304475196 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
130448 FF12725 001-5022 -521 .41-50 86.64
130449 VH14347 001-5022-521.41-50 86.64
130450984 001-5022 -521 .41-50 86.64
CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-5022-521.20-80 107.99
CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-5022-521.20-80 55.05
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5022-521.31-01 172.67
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5022-521.41-50 215.52
i
80 12G PP ROUNDS.60 PREVE 001-5022-521.31':01 575.14
ADVICE OF RIGHTS FORMS 001-5022-521.31-01 160.28
Postage 001-5022-521.42-10 33.78
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5022-521.31-01 657.73
DANNER ARCADIA BOOTS 426 001-5022-521.20-80 238.12
CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-5022-521.20-80 97.33
OUTDR PUSHBROOM & HANDLE 001-5022-521.31-80 40.81
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5022-521.49-90 8.12
January shipping charges 001-5022-521.31-01 4.71
Patrol Division Total: $6,246.00
LABEL MKR TAPE 001-5029-521.31-01 67.49
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5029-521.31-01 -67.49
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5029-521.31-01 87.39
Supplies 001-5029-521.31-01 4.43
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5029-521.31-01 36.05
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5029-521.31-01 36.37
January Scan charges 001-5029-521.42-10 7.53
Records Division Total: $171.77
WALL PHONE N SIDE 001-5050-521 .48-1 0 124.33
Facilities Maintenance Division Total: $124.33
Police Department Department Total: $7,431.92
OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-6010-522.31-01 128.09
BUNKER GEAR BLOWER 001-6010-522.31-01 31.67
Business cards 001-6010-522.31-01 44.92
SUPPLIES 001-6010-522.31-01 11.60
SUPPLIES 001-6010-522.31-01 5.61
PAPER (OFFICE,PRINT SHOP) 001-6010-522.31-01 58.33
PAPER (OFFICE,PRINT SHOP) 001-6010-522.31-01 16.32
PRINTING EQUIP & SUPPLIES 001-6010-522.31-01 19.49
OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-6010-522.31-01 19.56
January shipping charges 001-6010-522.42-10 31.30
191
Page 5
.- c:
Dale: 2/27/2006
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006 To: 2/24/2006
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount .
VERIZON WIRELESS 02-15 alc 26423041200002 001-6010-522.42-10 43.46
02-15 alc 66424372000001 001-6010-522.42-10 10.26
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF January Scan charges 001-6010-522.42-10 19.39
WSAFC 2006 MEMBERSHIP 001-601 0-522.49-01 50.00
Fire Department Administration Division Total: $490.00
CLALLAM CNTY FIRE DISTRICT 3 TRUCK ACADEMY 001-6020-522.43-10 500.00
CURTIS & SONS INC, L N Handline nozzle 001-6020-522.31-01 799.68
FAMILY SHOE STORE UNIFORM SHOES 001-6020-522.20-80 211.08
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE Sharpen chainsaw 001-6020-522.31-01 4.33
AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT & SUP 001-6020-522.31-01 15.91
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC Clothing allowance-Rose 001-6020-522.20-80 297.26
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-6020-522.31-01 3.19
CHEMICAL, COMMERCIAL,BULK 001-6020-522.31-01 2.46
VERIZON WIRELESS 02-15a1c 66421143200001 001-6020-522.42-10 2.00
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF January Scan charges 001-6020-522.42-10 0.16
Fire Department Fire Supression Division Total: $1,836.07
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Palm Pilot 001-6021-522.31-01 140.78
METROCALL 01-31 alc 03628583 001-6021-522.42 -1 0 7.89
MICHAEL CARR PALMONE TUNGSTEN 001:"6021-522.31-01 215.51
PORT ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT SUPPORT OFFICER LUNCH 001-6021-522.31-01 36.49
Fire Department Fire Volunteers Division Total: $400.67 .
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Video tapes 001-6025-526.31-01 43.30
Fire Department Medic I Division Total: $43.30
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC Business cards 001-6030-522.31-01 44.92
POSITIVE PROMOTIONS Junior FF items 001-6030-522.31-01 536.50
Fire Department Fire Prevention Division Total: $581.42
FARMER BROTHERS CO COFFEE SUPPLIES 001-6040-522.31-01 27.36
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC MASS TRANS,ACCES& PARTS 001-6040-522.31-01 50.80
WILDER TOYOTA INC BOARD ASSY 001-6040-522.31-01 83.54
Fire Department Fire Training Division Total: $161.70
HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC SHELVING MATERIALS 001-6050-522.31-20 28.68
PORT ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 001-6050-522.31-20 41.13
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC ROAD/HGWY HEAVY EQUIPMENT 001-6050-522.31-20 28.13
FURNITURE, OFFICE 001-6050-522.31-20 26.02
FURNITURE, OFFICE 001-6050-522.31-20 5.50
CUTLERY,DISHES GLASS ETC 001-6050-522.31-20 9.25
Fire Department Facilities Maintenance Division Total: $138.71
ORBIT ONE COMMUNICATIONS 01-31 alc 10434.24 001-6060-525.42-10 36.95
Fire Department Emergency Management Division Total: $36.95
Fire Department Department Total: $3,688.82
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Training-Walrath, Partch 001-7010-532.43-10 50.00 .
COMPLETE LINE, THE OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-7010-532.31-01 103.35
OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-7010-532.31-01 70.05
192
Page 6
(i...",:=....lcfot.,}.
..s.~~.;?,
..,',":~~
~
'C.,.. -=:;;;;;;.Jf
,..-1}:fi':~.'tt.Ur
.'j<~,i,::.^~',\'i". .<i
Date: 2/27/2006
ciq,Rffort Angeles
City CotinCiJExpenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006
To: 2/24/2006
. Vendor
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
OMWBE
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS
QUILL CORPORATION
QWEST
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CO
Public Works-Gen Fnd
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
. PENINSULA DAILY NEWS
RICOH CORPORATION-COPIES
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Parks & Recreation
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Parks & Recreation
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
GATEWAY INC
QWEST
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Parks & Recreation
AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY
.
FSH COMMUNICATIONS LLC
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
QWEST
SUSPENDED AQUATIC MENTOR INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Parks & Recreation
001-8010-574.31-01
001-8010-574.31-01
001-8010-574.44-10
001-8010-574.44-10
001-8010-574.45-30
001-8010-574.42-10
Division Total:
001-8011-574.31-01
001-8011-574.31-01
001-8011-574.42-10
Division Total:
001-8012-555.31-01
001-8012-555.31-60
001-8012-555.42-10
001-8012-555.42-10
001-8012-555.42-10
Division Total:
001-8020-576.31-01
001-8020-576.31-06
001-8020-576.42-10
001-8020-576.31-01
001-8020-576.42-10
001-8020-576.31-01
001-8020-576.42-10
Division Total:
Invoice Amount
59.88
82.03
126.67
250.00
92.60
62.70
110.20
28.50
127.53
40.72
48.72
43.70
11.61
139.47
32.55
$1,480.28
$1,480.28
376.79
89.64
27.55
115.85
30.00
4.50
$644.33
216.59
536.09
21.79
$774.47
95.29
1,546.52
40.75
40.71
1.01
$1,724.28
157.31
631.80
50.00
29.95
39.90
1,516.20
2.03
$2,427.19
Description Account Number
Business cards 001-7010-532.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-7010-532.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-7010-532.31-01
CERTIFICATION PROG COST 001-7010-532.49-01
FAX TONER 001-7010-532.31-01
SMALL WORKS ROSTER 001-7010-532.44-10
CONSULTANT'S ROSTER 001-7010-532.44-10
WUGA DW/ww RATE ORDINANCE 001-701 0-532.44-1 0
OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-7010,.532.31-01
02-05 alc 3604520140945B 001-7010-532.42-10
RAINGEARISAFETY VEST 001-7010-532.35-01
UNDERGROUND LOCATE 001-7010-532.41-50
01-06 alc 26470706000001 001-7010-532.42-10
January Scan charges 001-7010-532.42-10
MEDICAL SUPPLIES 001-7010-532.31-01
Administration Division Total:
Public Works-Gen Fnd Department Total:
Filing cabinet,supplies
Office supplies,Lego toy
SENIOR CTR FEE ORDINANCE
JOB ADIDEPUTY DIRECTOR
JAN COPIES
January Scan charges
Administration
Fax Phone
Shirts
January Scan charges
Recreation
Toner cartridge
Computer,accessories
02-09 alc 3604171942413B
02-05 alc 3604524285819B
January Scan charges
Senior Center
PAPER (OFFICE,PRINT SHOP)
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
02-01 alc 001001087584
Business cards
02-14 alc 3604570241950B
Basketball,volleyball set
January Scan charges
William Shore Pool
193
Page 7
------
(I Date: 2/27/2006
&~i(, City of Port Angeles
n.a
~ a:::;;;;;;..:w City Council Expenditure Report
0J.'~r".'lf..f>..).~";::' From: 2/11/2006 To: 2/24/2006
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount .
ALLWEST UNDERGROUND INC MET ALS,BARS,PLA TES,RODS 001-8050-536.31-20 6,817.95
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8050-536.31-20 363.89
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,TRA 001-8050-536.31-20 22.96
AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO INC BRICKS & CLAY PRODUCTS 001-8050-536.34-01 270.00
CEMETERY SUPPLIES 001-8050-536.34-01 792.00
CEMETERY SUPPLIES 001-8050-536.34-01 800.00
BLAKE SAND & GRAVEL INC SEED,SOD,SOIL&INOCULANT 001-8050-536.31-20 281.58
DEX MEDIA WEST FEB ADV-#200201655 001-8050-536.44-10 66.40
HEPBURN SUPERIOR MET ALS,BARS,PLA TES,RODS 001-8050-536.34-01 292.71
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-8050-536.31-20 39.51
QUIRING MONUMENTS INC CEMETERY MARKERS 001-8050-536.34-01 621.00
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEr001-8050-536.31-20 87.71
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEr001-8050-536.31-20 30.97
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8050-536.31-20 30.04
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF January Scan charges 001-8050-536.42-10 9.57
Parks & Recreation Ocean View Cemetery Division Total: $10,526.29
AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 156.62
CHEMICAL, COMMERCIAL,BULK 001-8080-576.31-20 253.30
WATER&SEWER TREATING CHEr..001-8080-576.31-20 219.95
CHEM RAW MATERIALS MFG 001-8080-576.31-20 680.67 .
CHEMICAL, COMMERCIAL,BULK 001-8080-576.31-20 251.43
WA TER&SEWER TREATING CHEr.. 001-8080-576.31-20 218.32
PAPER & PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 001-8080-576.31-20 207.94
CHEMICAL, COMMERCIAL,BULK 001-8080-576.31-20 253.30
WATER&SEWER TREATING CHEr..001-8080-576.31-20 219.95
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 8.14
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20 34.46
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20 51.98
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20 200.85
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20 89.78
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20 117.99
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20 18.65
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20 148.76
CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-8080-576.31-20 24.89
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 001-8080-576.31-20 5.03
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20 214.55
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,TRA 001-8080-576.31-20 16.34
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20 2.16
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20 5.53
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20 211.33 .
PAINTING EQUIPMENT & ACC 001-8080-576.31-20 42.18
ARROW SEPTIC INC BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 00 1-8080-576.48-10 433.20
194
Page 8
..'l.'AiIJ"",,,,~.."r'~,~.,,......~,, ,
"'-"""-'-'-^ ".~~~
Dale: 2/27/2006
.vendor
BAXTER AUTO PARTS #15
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL
HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC
LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP
NORTHWEST PLAYGROUND EQUIP INC
OLYMPIC SEWER & DRAIN CLEANING
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
. OLYMPIC SYNTHETIC PRODUCTS
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PARKER PAINT MFG CO INC
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE
. SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Ci~i~ffPort Angeles
~. ,.;,~,,:.'~
City Cou~tWExpenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006
To: 2/24/2006
Invoice Amount
49.21
462.50
240.00
105.44
32.44
329.47
568.59
504.38
-73.17
92.86
63.43
16.23
33.98
379.46
18.42
11,075.13
106.27
20.34
16.82
87.20
650.47
74.73
108.03
69.61
2,491.98
14.91
34.00
26.85
111.00
33.53
32.92
58.48
12.75
7.35
35.62
311.06
12.40
41.89
16.33
367.40
31.96
6.87
Description Account Number
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8080-576.31-20
Membership,training matls 001-8080-576.43-10
Registration-Breitbach 001-8080-576.43-10
Training materials 001-8080-576.43-10
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20
ROOFING MATERIALS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080.576.31-20
LEATHER& RELATED SUP,ACC 001-8080-576.31-20
LEATHER& RELATED SUP,ACC 001-8080-576.31-20
Playground repair parts 001-8080-576.31-20
PARK,PLA YGROUND,REC EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20
PW CONSTRUCTION & RELATED 001-8080-576.48-10
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-8080-576.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-8080-576.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-8080-576.31-01
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.35-01
COPYING MACHINE SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-01
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV 001-8080-576.31-01
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8080-576.31-20
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8080-576.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEf'001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEf'001-8080-576.31-20
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEf'001-8080-576.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEf'001-8080-576.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-8080-576.31-20
195
Page 9
Vendor
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC...
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Parks & Recreation
AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
CEO/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST INC
HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC
ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY INC
PARKER PAINT MFG CO INC
QWEST
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
XEROX CORPORATION
Parks & Rec-Maintenance
PORT ANGELES CHAMBER OF COMM
Convention Center
ALPINE PRODUCTS INC
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006
To: 2/24/2006
Description Account Number
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEI'001-8080-576.31-20
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-8080-576.31-40
January Scan charges 001-8080-576.42-10
Park Facilities Division Total:
Parks & Recreation Department Total:
PAPER & PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 001-8130-518.31-20
PAPER & PLASTIC-D1SPOSABL 001-8130-518.31-20
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8130-518.31-20
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8130-518.31-20
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8130-518.31-20
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8130-518.31-20
PAPER & PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 001-8130-518.31-20
i
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8130-518.31-20
PAPER & PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 001-8130-518.31-20
HAND TOOLS,POW&NON POWEI'001-8130-518.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8130-518.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8130-518.31-20
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 001-8130-518.31-20
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 001-8130-518.31-20
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 001-8130-518.31-20
PAINTS,COATINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8130-518.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLlEp ITEMS 001-8130-518.31-20
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEI'001-8130-518.31-20
BUILDER'S SUPPLIES 001-8130-518.31-20
POISONS:AGRICUL & INDUSTR 001-8130-518.41-50
PAINTS,COATINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8130-518.31-20
Paint 001-8130-518.31-20
02-02 ale 3604170786905B 001-8130-518.42-10
02-02 ale 3604175328784B 001-8130-518.42-10
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEI'001-8130-518.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8130-518.31-20
DC420AC2lease-Deeember 001-8130-518.45-30
Custodial/Janitorial Svcs Division Total:
Parks & Rec-Maintenance Department Total:
General Fund Fund Total:
2006 MKTG CONTRACT
Convention Center
Convention Center
Convention Center Fund
MA. RKERS, PLAQUES~IGNS
ly6
1 01-1430-557.50-83
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
102-7230-542.31-25
Page 10
Date: 2/27/2006
Invoice Amount
18.45
1.92
132.32
37.48
1.03
$22,957.64
$39,054.20
93.12
93.11
70.96
141.91
27.84
14.47
69.31
5.53
186.24
15.58
9.74
11.23
126.71
116.76
37.36
32.31
3.12
3.40
9.68
57.40
79.56
310.45
28.21
37.19
26.86
29.34
210.25
$1,847.64
$1,847.64
$109,473.63
13,663.23
$13,663.23
$13,663.23
$13,663.23
3,089.92
.
.
.
C' ",.,~~~"n ".,.
-t;~,:;,:.",{~;;ff';"~~:;:; y; '}r:::Q~:t
~ -R-
. . f.~,.~~ioJo.9
Vendor
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
BAXTER AUTO PARTS #15
BLAKE SAND & GRAVEL INC
CLALLAM CNTY DEPT OF HEALTH
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
DUSTBUSTERSINC
GATEWAY INC
KNIGHT FIRE PROTECTION INC
MIDDLETON AUTO AND TRUCK INC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PORT ANGELES POWER EQUIPMENT
.
PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Public Works-Street
. NORTH OLYMPIC PENINSULA RC & 0
Economic Development
City', ~~Port Angeles
City CouneniExpenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006
To: 2/24/2006
Date: 2/27/2006
Invoice Amount
27.19
8.56
11.69
20.14
31.26
120.54
65.00
138.88
358.00
4,104.57
361.72
1,140.41
376.88
68.49
86.32
74.72
158.44
51.74
50.68
9.72
15.26
16.18
147.89
49.09
222.44
40.58
245.69
21.25
60.98
46.57
81.08
64.84
40.30
86.41
0.85
$11,494.28
$11,494.28
$11,494.28
400.00
$400.00
$400.00
$400.00
Description Account Number
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 102-7230-542.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 102-7230-542.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.31-20
PAINTS,COATINGS,WALLPAPER 102-7230-542.31-20
PAINTS,COATINGS,WALLPAPER 102-7230-542.31-20
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,TRA 102-7230-542.31-20
TWINRIX SHOT ~MC CALEB 102-7230-542.43-10
Lodging-training,GS,MR 102-7230-542.43-10
Registrations-MR,GS 102-7230-542.43-10
Freezgard Zero CI Plus 102-7230-542.48-10
COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC. 102-7230-542.31-60
COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPH 102-7230-542.31-60
SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 102-7230-542.48-10
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.48-10
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 102-7230-542.48-10
COPYING MACHINE SUPPLIES 102-7230-542.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLY,INKS,LEADS 102-7230-542.31-25
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.31-20
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 102-7230-542.31-20
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 102-7230-542.48-10
02-08 Golf Course Rd 102-7230-542.47-10
02-14 SR101 & Euclid 102-7230-542.47-10
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.31-20
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEr 102-7230-542.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.31-20
MARKERS, PLAQUES,SIGNS 102-7230-542.31-25
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 102-7230-542.31-25
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 102-7230-542.48-10
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 102-7230-542.48-10
CLOTHING & APPAREL 102-7230-542.31-01
SHOES AND BOOTS 102-7230-542.31-20
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEr 1 02-7230-542.31-25
02-06 ale 26470706000002 102-7230-542.42-10
January Scan charges 102-7230-542.42-10
Street Division Total:
Public Works-Street Department Total:
Street Fund Fund Total:
NOPRC&D ANNUAL DUES 103-1511-558.49-01
Economic Development
Economic Development
Economic Development
197
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
Page 11
c;>"'~ '''~, ;'~.' ;': ~:;,;_;,~\!:.:",'()" ?Jr,'t i-...'.,
City;?~fPort Angeles Date: 2/27/2006
City CouricilExpenditure Report
.-.,:.; ......
. "(.r..,f<oJ'o~ From: 2/11/2006 . To: 2/24/2006
. Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
PORT ANGELES SCHOOL DISTRICT CHARGES FOR GYM CLEANUP 174-8222-574.41-50 216.96
B-BALL GYM CLEANUP CHARGE 174-8222-574.41-50 316.59
RAMSEY, SCOTT REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 280.00
RICOH CORPORATION-COPIES JAN COPIES 174-8222-574.49-60 83.00
ROONEY, RANDY L REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 280.00
SATHER, RONALD L REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 80.00
STEWART, JULIE A SCOREKEEPER PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 150.00
STEWART, PETER ALLAN REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 240.00
STONE, RICHARD REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 180.00
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC INSURANCE, ALL TYPES 174-8222-574.31-01 29.62
THOMAS, GREGORY REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 80.00
ULlN, BRADLEY V REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 440.00
WILSON, DONALD L REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 160.00
Recreation Activities Special Events Division Total: $7,046.17
RICOH CORPORATION-COPIES JAN COPIES 174-8224-574.49-60 100.00
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC SUPPLIES 174-8224-574.31-01 4.19
Recreation Activities Youth/Family Programs Division Total: $104.19
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Microwave oven 174-8229-574.31-01 98.61
. Recreation Activities Kitchen Division Total: $98.61
Recreation Activities Department Total: $7,708.76
Park & Recreation Fund Fund Total: $7,708.76
CLALLAM CNTY TREASURER Owest Settlement-Sr Bond 211-2419-311.10-00 1,880.66
Owest Settlement-FireBond 211-2419-311.10-00 95.41
Debt Service 2001 GO Bond-Refunding Division Total: $1,976.07
Debt Service Department Total: $1,976.07
2001 GO Refunding Bonds Fund Total: $1,976.07
CLALLAM CNTY TREASURER Owest Settlement-Library 212-2489-311.10-00 1,614.25
Debt Service 2005 GO Bond Re!lInding Division Total: $1,614.25
Debt Service Department Total: $1,614.25
2005 GO Refunding Bonds Fund Total: $1,614.25
MILBOR-PITA & ASSOCIATES INC Prof svcs pe 01-25 310-7930-595.41-50 3,937.11
Capital Projects-Pub Wks GF-Street Projects Division Total: $3,937.11
Capital Projects-Pub Wks Department Total: $3,937.11
WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LLC Prof svcs 12-01/01/31 310-8985-594.41-50 1,454.82
Capital proj-parks & Rec Misc Parks Projects Division Total: $1,454.82
Capital Proj-Parks & Rec Department Total: $1,454.82
Capital Improvement Fund Total: $5,391.93
EXEL TECH CONSULTING INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 328-7950-595.41-50 53,293.41
. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 328-7950-595.41-50 8,672.49
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS 8TH ST BRIDGES FOR SALE 328-7950-595.44-10 50.35
REPLACE 8TH ST BRIDGES 328-7950-595.44-10 334.80
Capital Projects-Pub Wks 8th St Bridge R1~~t Division Total: $62,351.05
Page 13
--
Date: 2/27/2006
City of Port Angeles
City Council'Expenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006 To: 2/24/2006
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount .
Capital Projects-Pub Wks Department Total: $62,351.05
8th St Bridge Reconstr Fund Total: $62,351.05
BPA-POWER WIRES January Transmission-EFT 401-0000-213.10-00 200,951.00
January Power EFT 401-0000-213.10-00 1,746,146.00
CEO/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-0000-141.40-00 5,172.41
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-0000-141 .40-00 311.90
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-0000-141.40-00 243.43
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-0000-141.40-00 38.91
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-0000-141 .40-00 142.65
GENERAL PACIFIC INC ELECTRICAL CABLES & WIRES 401-0000-141.40-00 12,154.66
ADOLPHSEN,BRENDA UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.1 0-99 59.01
ADRAGNA, MICHEAL UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 110.72
KAAKE, MICHELE L UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 58.80
KREMKAU, KAREN OVERPMT-1346 W LAURIDSEN 401-0000-122.10-99 9.55
SMITH, TIFFANY UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.1 0-99 39.14
TAYLOR-ROSE, BRIAN UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 260.25
PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-0000-141.40-00 172.91
ELECTRICAL CABLES & WIRES 401-0000-141 .40-00 646.96
RELIABLE EQUIPMENT & SERVICE INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-0000-237.00-00 -18.41 .
Division Total: $1,966,499.89
Department Total: $1,966,499.89
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO STANDARD STAKES 401-7111-533.31-01 13.63
COMPLETE LINE, THE SUPPLIES 401-7111-533.31-01 1,522.99
JOBS AVAILABLE INC ELEC ENGINEERING MANAGER 401-7111-533.44-10 61.20
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC SUPPLIES 401-7111-533.48-10 472.19
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS ELEC ENGINEER SPECIALIST 401-7111-533.44-10 143.89
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC. 401-7111-533.31-60 326.95
Public Works-Electric Engineering-Electfic Division Total: $2,540.85
Bonneville Power Admin REGISTRA TION-KAJFASZ 401-7120-533.43-10 100.00
PUD #1 OFCLALLAM COUNTY 02-022110 Glass Rd 401-7120-533.33-50 67.65
Public Works-Electric Power Resource Mgmt Division Total: $167.65
ADVANCED TRAVEL HazMat Training-McCaughan 401-7180-533.43-10 345.92
AMSAN OL YMPICSUPPL Y PAPER & PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 401-7180-533.31-20 286.20
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 401-7180-533.48-10 15.57
EPOXY BASED FORMULAS 401-7180-533.48-10 4.18
ASPLUNDH ROADSIDE,GRNDS,REC. PARK 401-7180-533.41-50 5,443.20
ROADSIDE,GRNDS,REC, PARK 401-7180-533.41-50 3,110.40
BAXTER AUTO PARTS #15 ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 8.05
BLAKE SAND & GRAVEL INC MACHINERY & HEAVY HRDWARE 401-7180-533.48-10 7.69
CEO/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 124.70 .
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 59.57
ELECTRICAL CABLES &WIRES 401-7180-533.48-10 68.72
200
Page 14
,,'H~,tf:~i"~':;; ,'j\ti.';+~t!ri,' \('~'f,J;'-;;-':~',fcii~1f:'/:;';'i:tifi:\:;~;-#,
citYij,fPort Angeles
City Councif Expenditure. Report
From: 2/11/2006
To: 2/24/2006
Date: 2/27/2006
. Vendor
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
IRELAND, DAVID H
AI Oman
George Drake
NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY
NORTHWEST FENCE CO
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
OLYMPIC SYNTHETIC PRODUCTS
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS
PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
PORT ANGELES POWER EQUIPMENT
QUILL CORPORATION
. QWEST
RED LION HOTEL-PORT ANGELES
RELIABLE EQUIPMENT & SERVICE INC
ROHLlNGER ENTERPRISES INC
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
.TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Description Account Number
Cable 401-7180-533.48-10
HTE WORK ORDERS-SPCC REGS 401-7180-533.41-50
NATL CODE CHANGE CLASS-AO 401~7180-533.43-10
MILAGE REIMBURSALcG.DRAKE 401-7180-533.43-10
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10
ROADSIDE,GRNDS,REC, PARK 401-7180-533.48-10
PRINTING,SILK SCR,TYPSET 401-7180-533.31-20
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.31-01
OFFICE MECHAIDS,SM MACH 401-7180-533.31-01
OPTICAL EQUIP ACESS& SUPP 401-7180-533.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 401-7180-533.48-10
LIGHT OPS MGR AD 401-7180-533.44-10
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01
CLEANING COMPOSITION/SOLV 401-7180-533.48-10
PUMPS & ACCESSORIES 401-7180-533.48-10
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.31-01
02-02 ale 3604178095336B 401-7180-533.42-10
02-02 ale 206Z020411942B 401-7180-533.42-10
02-14 ale 3604574717777B 401-7180-533.42-10
IRELAND CONSULTING 401-7180-533.41-50
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01
CLOTHING & APPAREL 401-7180-533.31-20
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 401-7180-533.31-20
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 401-7180-533.31-20
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 401-7180-533.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 401-7180-533.35-01
TAPE(NOT DP,SOUND,VIDEO) 401-7180-533.48-10
TAPE(NOT DP,SOUND,VIDEO) 401-7180-533.48-10
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 401-7180-533.48-10
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 401-7180-533.48-10
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEr401-7180-533.48-10
MACHINERY & HEAVY HRDWARE 401-7180-533.48-10
CLOTHING & APPAREL 401-7180-533.31-20
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEr401-7180-533.35-01
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 401-7180-533.48-10
January shipping charges 401-7180-533.42-10
201
Invoice Amount
53.85
1,040.40
75.00
72.40
23.63
590.41
1,804.28
68.72
19.67
33.87
29.82
15.54
19.49
34.18
115.88
106.21
295.88
4.32
109.09
111.31
39.36
64.98
38.19
156.62
240.21
291.56
126.17
16.82
19.06
33.24
51.73
6.60
13.62
5.22
3.02
35.23
19.17
104.20
37.23
27.92
112.41
30.38
Page 15
Vendor
VERIZON WIRELESS
WAGNER-SMITH EQUIPMENT CO
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
WASHINGTON (DRS), STATE OF
Public Works-Electric
ANGELES MACHINE WORKS INC
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
AWWA NW SUBSECTION
CEO/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST INC
COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
HDR/EES INC
JCI-JONES CHEMICALS INC
PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
UNITED FIRE SERVICE INC
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR
WASHINGTON (015), STATE OF
Public Works-Water
ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INC
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
AWWA NW SUBSECTION
BLAKE SAND & GRAVEL INC
CEO/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST INC
COLE INDUSTRIAL INC
FISHER SCIENTIFIC LLC
HDR/EES INC
JCI-JONES CHEMICALS INC
LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP
METROCALL
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006
To: 2/24/2006
Description Account Number
02-04 ale 87025112400001 401-7180-533.42-10
02-04 ale 87025110300001 401-7180-533.42-10
02-12 ale 77025112400001 401-7180-533.42-10
02-12 ale 77025110300001 401-7180-533.42-10
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 401-7180-533.35-01
January Scan charges 401-7180-533.42-10
Statewide pensioners-Jan 401-7180-533.20-30
Electric Operations Division Total:
Public Works-Electric Department Total:
Electric Utility Fund Fund Total:
MACHINERY & HEAVY HRDWARE 402-7380-534.48-10
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 402-7380-534.31-20
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 402-7380-534.31-20
3 TRAINING FEES 402-7380-534.43-10
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 402-7380-534.31-20
Water Quality Tech ad 402-7380-534.44-10
Prof svcs pe 12-31-05 402-7380-534.41-50
T ANKS:MOBILE,PORT,ST A TION 402-7380-534.31-05
T ANKS:MOBILE,PORT,ST A TION 402-7380-534.31-05
02-09203 Reservoir Rd 402-7380-534.47-10
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 402-7380-534.31-20
CLOTHING & APPAREL 402-7380-534.31-20
NURSERY STOCK & SUPPLIES 402-7380-534.34-02
PUMPS & ACCESSORIES 402-7380-534.48-10
UNDERGROUND LOCATE 402-7380-534.48-10
January Scan charges 402-7380-534.42-10
Water Division Total:
Public Works-Water Department Total:
Water Fund Fund Total:
CLINICAL LAB REAGENTS TES 403-7480-535.48-10
BUILDER'S SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.48-10
1 TRAINING FEE 403-7480-535.43-10
BRICKS & CLAY PRODUCTS 403-7480-535.31-20
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 403-7480,..535.31-20
STEAM & HOT WATER FITTING 403-7480-535.31-20
STEAM & HOT WATER FITTING 403-7480-535.31-20
LAB &FIELD EQUIP,BIO,BOT 403-7480-535.31-20
Prof svcs pe 12-31-05 403-7480-535.41-50
CHEMICAL, COMMERCIAL,BULK 403-7480-535.31-20
LEATHER& RELATED SUP,ACC 403-7480-535.31-20
01-31 ale 03622727 403-7480-535.42-10
SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-01
202
Page 16
Date: 2/27/2006
Invoice Amount
59.75
59.75
111.47
59.75
119.78
22.71
200.16
$16,204.46
$18,912.96
$1,985,412.85
162.45
14.37
29.98
225.00
28.91
200.00
559.12
1,924.52
-850.00
105.09
23.33
10.69
15.17
5,252.34
21.85
7.59
$7,730.41
$7,730.41
$7,730.41
260.00
2,424.51
75.00
85.29
28.90
119.52
119.52
59.42
559.12
5,427.39
58.91
40.36
20.25
.
.
.
~;t!:J:';'lS'j, ,-1 ;_~.:~}.~t .:';', ",'''~:~'e::'Y~_ ~':1; 1t'ii.~~:':;":~1:
~. ", ;~-,,;
Date: 2/27/2006
City9fPort Angeles
City Counc~i Expenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006
To: 2/24/2006
. Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC... SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-01 8.95
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-01 116.98
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 403-7480-535.31-20 34.65
PARKER PAINT MFG CO INC PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 403-7480-535.31-20 419.06
PEN PRINT INC SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-01 50.90
PETTIT OIL COMPANY FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 403-7480-535.32-11 1;418.86
QWEST 02-02 a/c 3604170591196B 403-7480-535.42-10 37.19
02-08 ale 3605650365696B 403-7480-535.42-10 37.19
02-02 a/c 3604170190080B 403-7480-535.42-10 37.42
S & B INC DMS MAl NT. FEE 403-7480-535.48-10 650.00
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 403-7480-535.31-20 6.40
PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 1.45
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 403-7480-535.31-20 18.97
WELDING EQUIPMENT/SUPPLY 403-7480-535.31-20 22.02
SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-20 12.82
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 403-7480-535.48-10 46.54
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 403-7480-535.31-20 3.00
HOSES, ALL KINDS 403-7480-535.31-20 16.10
LAB &FIELD EQUIP,BIO,BOT 403-7480-535.31-20 48.80
. SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-20 4.16
SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-20 15.90
PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 2.49
PAINTING EQUIPMENT & ACC 403-7480-535.31-20 35.50
PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 2.03
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE January shipping charges ' 403-7480-535.42-10 9.58
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR UNDERGROUND LOCATE 403-7480-535.41-50 21.85
WA STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 2006 1 ST HALF NPDES FEES 403-7480-535.49-90 6,920.64
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF January Scan charges 403-7480-535.42-10 13.54
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Wastewater Division Total: $19,291.18
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: $19,291.18
Wastewater Fund Fund Total: $19,291.18
ADAPT CONSULTING INC COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 404-0000-237.00-00 -37.90
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 404-0000-237.00-00 -11.98
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 404-0000-237.00-00 -5.00
Division Total: -$54.88
Department Total: -$54.88
ADAPT CONSULTING INC COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 404-7580-537.44-'10 494.45
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 404-7580-537.44-10 156.22
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 404-7580-537.44-10 65.15
. ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO PIPE AND TUBING 404-7580-537.31-20 30.51
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 404-7580-537.31-20 5.36
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC Business cards 404-7580-537.31-01 29.94
203
Page 17
~;:!lL",*;~'!:"ii'..f,:N"'i, .~""",.,~,:~'f<.Y)~~,~i\?I"i~
';>":'.'~" >,".".,t,
~:'" -,7"'; . ~,- - ,;
Cit!:pfPort Angeles
City Coun~itExpenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006
To: 2/24/2006
Date: 2/27/2006
. Vendor
Fire Department
C & F INSULATION
DAVE'S HEATING & COOLING SVC
MATHEWS GLASS CO INC
Allen Morrison
Charlotte Arredondo
David Delaney
Jerry Hvass
Lee Shames
Matt Bierne
Robert Bernard
Stephanie Stone
Public Works-Electric
AIRPORT GARDEN CENTER
. Public Works-Electric
GEOTIVITY INC
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr
DELHUR INDUSTRIES INC
Public Works-Solid Waste
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
MIDDLETON AUTO AND TRUCK INC
. PETTIT OIL COMPANY
Description
Medic I
Fire Department
Medic I Utility
CITY REBATE-WISE
CITY REBATE-KALlSH/STEINB
CITY REBATE-PARRILL
CITY REBATE
CITY REBATE
CITY REBATE
CITY REBATE
CITY REBATE
CITY REBATE
CITY REBATE
CITY REBATE
Conservation Loans
Public Works-Electric
Conservation Loans/Grants
FEED,BEDDING,VIT-ANIMALS
FEED,BEDDiNG,VIT -ANIMALS
Electric Projects
Public Works-Electric
Electric Utility CIP
CSO MONITORING
Account Number
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
421-7121-533.49-86
421-7121-533.49-86
421-7121-533.49-86
421-7121-533.49-86
421-7121-533.49-86
421-7121-533.49-86
421-7121-533.49-86
421-7121-533.49~86
421-7121-533.49-86
421-7121-533.49-86
421-7121-533.49-86
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
451-7188-594.34-03
451-7188-594.34-03
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
453-7488-594.48-10
Wastewater Projects Division Total:
Public Works-ww/Stormwtr Department Total:
WasteWater Utility CIP Fund Total:
PW CONSTRUCTION & RELATED 454-7588-594.65-10
Solid Waste Coli Projects
Public Works-Solid Waste
Solid Waste Utility CIP
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
Diesel
Diesel
205
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
501-0000-237.00-00
501-0000-237.00-00
501-0000-237.00-00
501-0000-141.40-00
501-0000-141.40-00
501-0000-141.40-00
501-0000-141 .40-00
501-0000-141 .40-00
501-0000-141 .40-00
501-0000-141.20-00
501-0000-141.20-00
Invoice Amount
$6,182.53
$6,182.53
$6,182.53
1,286.25
1,000.00
645.16
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
60.00
75.00
25.00
$3,216.41
$3,216.41
$3,216.41
116.96
109.65
$226.61
$226.61
$226.61
2,648.74
$2,648.74
$2,648.74
$2,648.74
84,671.05
$84,671.05
$84,671.05
$84,671.05
-10.69
-15.38
-4.41
74.63
-40.60
-8.98
28.23
54.34
50.98
477.89
3,610.36
Page 19
... .,~
,\\...[:17........ Date:. 2/27/2006
~ City of Port Angeles
~ .-=:;;;;;..>> City Council Expenditure Report
. :>iYfi!Jr.'t~~r From: 2I11)2{)06 To: 2124/2006
, .-t.j
(' ';7 .
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT! ITEMS 501-0000-141 .40-00 100.37
Division Total: $4,316.74
Department Total: $4,316.74
BEN-KO-MA TIC AUTO & TRUCK MAINTi ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 391.91
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT: ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 401.68
HEARTLlNE AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT: ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 64.93
AUTO & TRUCK MAINTi ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 56.26
AUTO & TRUCKMAINT; ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 54.10
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT: ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 139.48
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT~ ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 200.62
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT; ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 57.46
MIDDLETON AUTO AND TRUCK INC AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT, ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 55.38
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT: ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 55.38
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 52.18
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT: ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 35.63
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 12.06
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 19.18
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 9.74
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT, ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 24.03
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 53.61 .
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 11.78
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT, ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 23.06
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 30.53
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 13.83
,
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 41.14
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 37.78
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 19.97
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 19.35
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 19.97
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 12.74
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 501-7630-548.31-01 31.03
. Ie.",
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 501-7630-548.31-01 50.65
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 501-7630-548.31-01 104.89
PAPER (OFFICE,PRINT SHOP) 501-7630-548.31-01 118.26
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION 501-7630-548.31-01 218.46
OFFICE SUPPL Y,INKS,LEADS 501-7630-548.31-01 58.24
RENTAULEASE EQUIPMqNT 501-7630-548.31-01 216.58
RENTAULEASE EQUIPMENT 501-7630-548.31-01 -218.46
SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 501-7630-548.31-01 204.74
RENTAULEASE EQUIPMENT 501-7630-548.31-01 -204.74 .
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS FLEET MGR AD 501-7630-548.44-10 115.85
PERRY'S TIRE FACTORY AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 243.57
2Q6
Page 20
f ~j:l~,j:~,.'L:' J~/;:;:\1Ii :~~f~-/f,1~\;'~',Y~:l17'r \.. ;f\lt{.
Citjrj,:~f;rort Angeles
City Counc.~Expenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006
To: 2/24/2006
Date: 2/27/2006
.vendor
PETTIT OIL COMPANY
.
. SIMPSON'S USED PARTS & TOWING
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE
Description
Jan Cardlock-EQ0004
Jan Cardlock-EQ0009
Jan Cardlock-EQ0015
Jan Cardlock-EQ0027
Jan Cardlock-EQ0028
Jan Cardlock-EQ0029
Jan Cardlock-EQ0030
Jan Cardlock-EQ0034
Jan Cardlock-EQ0035
Jan Cardlock-EQ0036
Jan Cardlock-EQ0040
Jan Cardlock-EQ0041
Jan Cardlock-EQ0042
Jan Cardlock-EQ0043
Jan Cardlock-EQ0044
Jan Cardlock-EQ0045
Jan Cardlock-EQ0046
Jan Cardlock-EQ0053
Jan Cardlock~EQ0054
Jan Cardlock-EQ0065
Jan Cardlock-EQ0087
Jan Cardlock-EQ0088
Jan Cardlock-EQ0089
Jan Cardlock-EQ0095
Jan Cardlock-EQ0096
Jan Cardlock-EQ0147
Jan Cardlock-EQ4101
Jan Cardlock-EQ4102
Jan Cardlock-EQ4103
Jan Cardlock-EQ4104
Jan Cardlock-EQ4105
Jan Cardlock-EQ4201
Jan Cardlock-EQ4900
Jan Cardlock-EQ5202
Jan Cardlock-EQ5425
Jan Cardlock-EQ5426
Jan Cardlock-EQ0045
Jan Cardlock-EQ0048
Jan Cardlock-EQ5106
Jan Cardlock-EQ5107
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
207
Account Number
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630~548.32-1 0
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.32-10
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
Invoice Amount
23.73
32.76
22.48
30.46
32.88
51.28
38.90
232.85
53.34
226.08
51.02
168.72
49.29
166.62
196.74
91.98
73.63
70.83
92.18
63.54
97.81
132.47
33.04
166.80
34.27
89.34
270.81
172.67
93.23
142.87
193.01
109.30
107.43
30.71
19.70
39.00
54.72
157.51
191.06
115.15
108.30
7.79
Page 21
. Vendor
DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES
Self Insurance
Eco Compliance Corporation
QWEST-CLAIMS
Self Insurance
.
AWC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST
Fireman's Pension
EDENSCAPES
PA DOWNTOWN ASSN
ASM SIGNS
LAUREL BLACK DESIGN
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PARKER PAINT MFG CO INC
RICOH CORPORATION-COPIES
SENIUK, JAKE
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Esther Webster/Fine Arts
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
PROF COLLECTION AGENCIES INC
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 589
UNITED WAY (PAYROLL)
.'''J ::>:/'j" ">4i:;..'
'1 ,"'.' , ,
city~fPort Angeles
City coun~ir;Expenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006 To: 2/24/2006
Description Account Number Invoice Amount
4th Qtr 2005 503-1661-517.49-50 20,378.22
Worker's Compensation Division Total: $20,378.22
PARTIAL CLAIM SETTLEMENT 503-1671-517.49-98 1,207.07
CLAIM SETTLEMENT 503-1671-517 .49-98 456.43
Camp Liability Division Total: $1,663.50
Self Insurance Department Total: $195,312.51
Self-Insurance Fund Fund Total: $195,312.51
FEB FIREMENS PREMIUM 602-6221-517.46-35 7,114.80
Fireman's Pension Division Total: $7,114.80
Fireman's Pension Department Total: $7,114.80
Firemen's Pension Fund Total: $7,114.80
EDENSCAPES 650-0000-213.10-90 23.84
JAN DECAL SALES 650-0000-231.91-00 742.38
JAN PBIA RECEIPTS 650-0000-231.92-00 5,798.99
JAN FIRST ST pLAZA 650-0000-231.93-00 1,586.32
Division Total: $8,151.53
Department Total: $8,151.53
Off Street Parking Fund Fund Total: $8,151.53
Vinyls 652-8630-575.31-01 89.86
NOP Visitor Guide 652-8630-575.44-10 400.00
Microprint paper 652-8630-575.49-60 34.06
Calendar 652-8630-575.31-01 19.29
2 Matte boards 652-8630-575.31-01 17.54
Paint 652-8630-575.31-20 57.66
JAN COPIES 652-8630-575.49-60 21.00
Software,ram 652-8630-575.31-01 212.47
Office supplies.ink 652-8630-575.31-01 489.42
Phone card 652-8630-575.42-10 21.77
Print Announcement 652-8630-575.49-60 347.95
Mounting tape 652-8630-575.31-01 4.70
Paint supplies 652-8630-575.31-20 25.87
Esther Webster/Fine Arts Division Total: $1,741.59
Esther Webster/Fine Arts Department Total: $1,741.59
Esther Webster Fund Fund Total: $1,741.59
P/R Deductions pe 02~12 920-0000-231.56-30 628.00
P/R Deductions pe 02-12 920-0000-231.55-30 376.00
P/R Deductions pe02-12 920-0000-231.56-20 1,455.68
P/R Deductions pe 02-12 920-0000-231.56-20 169.85
P/R Deductions pe 02-12 920-0000-231.56-30 11.93
P/R Deductions pe 02-12 920-0000-231.54-10 2,898.00
P/R Deductions pe 02-12 920-0000-231.56-10 367.00
209
Page 23
--
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 2/11/2006
To: 2/24/2006
Dale: 2/27/2006
Vendor
VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSOCIATION
WSCFF/EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST
Totals for check period
Description
P/R Deductions pe 02-12
P/R Deductions pe 02-12
Account Number
920-0000-231.55-20
920-0000-231.53-20
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
Invoice Amount
26.00
1,575.00
$7,507.46
$7,507.46
$7,507.46
$2,623,374.16
.
.
.
Payroll Clearing
From: 2/11/2006 To: 2/24/2006
210
Page 24
.
.
.
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
March 7, 2006
To:
CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Worlcs and Utilities l>\r.-t/
SUBJECT:
Project Acceptance, 2006 Emergency Storm Repairs, Project No. 06-02
Summary: Jordan Excavating, Inc., has completed all work related to the subject project. It has
been inspected and accepted as complete and the final payment has been processed.
Recommendation: Accept the 2006 Emergency Storm Repairs, Project No. 06-02 as
com leted b Jordan Excavatin , Inc.
Background! Analysis:
During the period of January 1-3, exceptionally high tides and winter storm events coincided to
cause the failure of the waterfront trail on Ediz Hook Road and in several locations of the shore
revetment currently relied upon to protect a portion of the Olympic Discovery Trail.
Specifically, the high-tide and wind-driven wave action caused the heavy loose rip rap to fall
from the upland area, leaving several areas of the trail facility exposed to further erosion activity. '
On Ediz Hook Road, erosion undermined the paved trail facility and created a safety concern.
Jordan Excavating, Inc., has completed all work associated with construction of emergency
repairs to the waterfront trail on Ediz Hook and the Olympic Discovery Trail east of the
Rayonier Mill site. This work consisted of placing heavy riprap in several locations of the
shoreline revetment, reconstruction of the trail sub grade, and pavement restoration. The work
has been inspected and accepted as complete and the final payment has been processed. The
following table is a summary of project construction costs, including applicable taxes:
Original Contract Contract Change Unit Quantity Project Cost
Amount Orders (0) Varhitions Final Cost Variance
$44,848.00 $0.00 ($437.15) $44,410.85 -1%
It is recommended that Council accept the project as completed by Jordan Excavating, Inc.
N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\2006 Stonn Repair Final acceptance, Proj 06-02.doc
211
.
.
.
212
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
MARCH 7, 2006
CITY COUNCIL
MARK E. MAnsEN - CITY MANAGER 7Yf 1-?y\
OFFICE SPACE RECONFIGURATION
Summary: The office space for the City Manager needs reconfigured to lessen traffic interruptions
and better accommodate staff needs.
Background/Analysis: Traffic through the City Manager's office space to access the Caucus
Room creates unacceptable interruptions and disrupts the work environment. In October 2005,
Mayor Headrick, council members Pittis, Williams, and Rogers individually suggested that an office
space reconfiguration be considered for the City Manager's office area. After two months of
consultation with other Department Heads, it was agreed that this was a priority need that should be
addressed sooner rather than waiting for a more comprehensive space study.
.
The 2005 amended budget approved by Council included $25,000 for reconfiguration of this suite of
offices. In January 2006, Lindberg and Smith Architects conducted a space study and re-designed
the space to create an interior hallway and reconfigure the offices.
Estimated cost for reconfiguration is $29,500 using City crews for most of the work.
.
213
.
.
.
214
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT FOR FEBRUARY, 2006
CHANGE ORDERS FOR ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
(COSTS SHOWN INCLUDE APPLICABLE TAXES)
. PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL PREVIOUS CHANGE REVISED
TITLE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS CONTRACT
AMOUNT ORDERS TIDS AMOUNT
MONTH
Elwha Elec. UG Extension $220,000 $202,466.85 $0.00 $0.00 $202,466.85
02-11
WUGA Utility Ext. 05-01 $3,300,000 $3,067,083.08 $104,870.68 $0.00 $3,171,953.76
Shane Pk Drainage 05-14 $290,000 $209,800.93 ($84,604.52) $40,937.40 $166,583.81
P ALF Stormwater 05-16 $685,000 $641,654.12 $0.00 $0.00 $641,654.12
Park/Campbell Imp 04- $716,000 $674,658.24 $190,096.95 $0.00 $864,755.19
04/05-12
Oak/Laurel Outfall.05-24 $95,000 $55,210.26 $21,120.00 $0.00 $76,330.26
Muni. Pier Repairs 03-18 $450,000 $434,212.00 $0.00 $0.00 $434,212.00
2006 Storm Repairs 06-02* $50,000 $44,848.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,848.00
* Small Works Project
.
CONTRACTS/PURCHASE ORDERS APPROVED BY CITY MANAGER
(COSTS SHOWN INCLUDE APPLICABLE TAXES)
CONTRACTOR Project- DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
OR VENDOR PO#'
,
PROJECT
TITLE
UPCOMING PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS
(NEXT 30 DAYS, ESTIMATED DATES SHOWN )
ADVERTISE FOR BID OPENING START END
BIDS CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION
Cedar Street March 12, 2006 April 7, 2006
Wall 05-22
April, 2006
June, 2006
8th St Bridges December 28, 2005 February 10, 2006
02-15
Spring 2006
Fall 2007
P ALF Shoreline March 5, 2006 April 7, 2006
tabilize 02-21
May 2006
Fall 2006
N:\PWKS\ENGINEER\Management Reports\Change Orders\Change Orders 2000J.06.doc
215
PUBLIC WORKS GRANT & LOAN APPLICATION STATUS REPORT
FEBRUARY, 2006
. .
Project Description Project Total GrantILoan Source & Grant Match or Award Status
Cost Cost Loan Data Listing
CSO/Stormwater Centennial Grant Loan rates and grant matches June 2006 Application
Projects $32,000,000 SRF & PWTF Loans vary with programs filed
$ Vary with Program
Eastern Corridor $430,000 SAFETEA-LU Grant: 15.6% ($67,000) February Selected
Entryway, Phase II Enhancement Grant minimum match. City 2006
$363,000 $25,000, City $41,000 in-kind
Dry Creek Bridge & $93,000 . lAC Grant: 22% ($20,460) local November Selected
Trail Planning $72,540 match 2005
Stormwater Phase II $75,000 DOE Phase II Grant January Selected
Implementation Municipal 2006
Assistance Stormwater
. $75,000
BRAC:
Centennial:
DWSRF:
lAC:
PWTF:
Safe Routes to School:
SAFETEA-LU:
TIB, AlP:
TIB, PSMP:
Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee
DOE administered grant /loan funding for water quality improvement projects
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
InterAgency Committee for Outdoor Recreation
Public W orIes Trust Fund
WSDOT administered grant program for School Route safety improvements
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient, Transportation Equity Act, a Legacy for Users. WSDOT
administered federal highway grant funding for intermodal transportation projects.
Transportation Improvement Board, Arterial Improvement Program
Transportation Improvement Board, Pedestrian Safety and Mobility Program
.
1:\PWKS\ENGINEER\Management Reports\Grants & Loans\Grants & Loans 06\2-06.doc
.
216
.
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
February 8, 2006
6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Leonard Rasmussen, Dave Johnson, Cherie Kidd, Kevin
Snyder, Candace Kalish, John Matthews
Members Absent:
One vacancy
Staff Present:
Sue Roberds, Scott Johns, Nathan West, Jim Mahlum
Public Present:
Loran Olsen, Sam Tikka, Penny Miller, Susan and Ed
Bauer, Julie Smith, John Ralston, Jack Powell, Lorretta
Commet, Tyler Ahlgren, Adrian Hoban, Steve Zenovic
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Snyder moved to approve the January 11, 2006, minutes as
presented. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Johnson and passed 6 - O.
.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
REZONE REOUEST - REZ 06-01 - RALSTON - Approximately 1.86 acres
located between Park Avenue and Highland Avenue west of Porter Street.
Proposal to rezone from RS-7 Residential Single Family to RMD Residential
Medium Density.
Under the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, Commissioner Cherie Kidd noted that she is
associated with the applicant, Commissioner Rasmussen noted that he owns the building in
which the applicant's representative works, and Commissioner Kalish lives in the general
neighborhood around the Peninsula College. No one from the audience objected to any member
of the Commission remaining to act on the proposals.
Associate Planner Scott Johns presented the Department report recommending approval
of the rezone as proposed. Chair Rasmussen noted that those who testify must sign in and affirm
that their testimony will be truthful to the best of their knowledge and opened the public hearing.
Steve Zenovic, Zenovic and Associates, 519 South Peabody, explained the proposal and
responded to questions regarding improvements, drainage, and development patterns in the area.
He noted that the rezone proposal encompasses approxiinately the north 55% of the subject lots
to be rezoned from RS-7 Residential Single Family to RMD Residential Medium Density. A
row of RS-7 property is proposed to remain along Highland Avenue between the property
proposed for rezone and existing single family development south of Highland Avenue. Both
Park Avenue and Porter Street are arterials where the infrastructure can support the rezone to
. Residential Medium Density. Density issues were discussed with regard to RMD zoning.
217
Planning Commission Minutes
February8,2006
Page 2
Commissioner Kalish stated that she is very familiar with the historic drainage issues in .
the area and feels that the City has neglected dealing with issues. She would vote against the
rezone for that reason.
Steve Zenovic acknowledged that there are drainage issues in the area but did not believe
that one developer or property owner should be penalized or made to suffer due to historic issues
in the. area. The City is trying to correct the problems but they are long standing and far
reaching. A rezone of the property will not result in increased drainage. Any development on
the site will be required to address individual drainage issues. Single family residential
development will not be required to address drainage issues in the same manner that a multiple
family developer would.
Loran Olsen, 1132 Highland Avenue, submitted maps and a letter from which he read to
the Commission his concerns regarding the rezone proposal. Mr. Ralston approached him as a
neighborhood representative several months previous in order to outline his plan to rezone the
property in order to provide the neighborhood with advanced notice of the proposal. The
neighborhood had been discussing the proposal as a group for several weeks.
Mr. Olsen's main issue was the revelation that the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
designation for the site indicates High Density Residential rather than Medium Density
Residential for the property. He asked that the underlying Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
designation be reversed to Medium Density Residential, which it had been designated prior to
2003, prior to any further consideration of the proposed rezone to Residential Medium Density.
He and his neighbors do.not want college dormitories to be developed on the site and they are
concerned that, given the proximity to the college, that will be the case if the site is rezoned.
The existing single family residential dwelling units owned by Mr. Ralston on Porter Street are .
rented by college students who are disruptive at times.
Storm drainage in the area is overwhelming and needs to be adequately addressed
immediately. He asked that the City give prompt and serious attention to the issues of reversing
the. Medium Density Comprehensive Plan land use designation of the site before further
considering the rezone proposal.
Penny Miller, 1130 E. Park Avenue realized that the topic of discussion cannot be
whether dormitories will be built on the property if rezoned, but must only dwell on those uses
that can be included in the RHD zone. However, since Mr. Ralston previously discussed
potential uses of the site with neighbors, she felt it was a safe assumption that he may plan to
construct dormitories on his property if rezoned. She noted that she submitted a letter in
opposition to the rezone during the written public comment period that was included in staffs
report.
Sam Tikka, 1119 and 1123 East Park Avenue understood that he could not specifically
testify as to the proposed development of the site as dormitories because. specific development is
not the issue that is before the Commission. Nevertheless, he wished to say that he objects to
dormitories in the area and would like to see the development of the property as single family
residential only. Multiple family use of the property is not desired as it would result in lighting
impacts and an increase in drainage issues to the area.
Julie Smith, 1107 East Park Avenue is not opposed to development but is very
concerned about drainage issues in the area and traffic on Park Avenue, which is critical. Speed
is a real concern that no one seems able to address and additional development will make matters
worse. .
Loretta Commett, 1117 Grant Avenue, was against the proposed zoning as it would
bring an undesirable change to the area.
218
.
.
.
;r;~:;;',
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8. 2006
Page 3
Adrian Hoban, 1110 Grant Avenue, was against the proposed rezoning as it would bring
a radical change to the established neighborhood. Additional lighting, traffic, and increased
stormwaterissues are issues of major concern. The site should be single family.
Sam Tikka added that if more people in the neighborhood were notified of the proposal,
even more people would have voiced objection to the proposal.
There being no further testimony, Chair Rasmussen closed the public hearing.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Zenovic identified permitted uses in the
RMD zone.
Jim Mahlum, Civil Engineer for the City of Port Angeles,explained utility
improvements that have recently been made in the area. A storm system was recently installed
on the north side of Park Avenue to accommodate curb, gutter, and sidewalks in the area. The
sewer service was also recently increased in size to handle existing and expected development in
the area and south of the location. Drainage is an issue and the City is dealing with the problems
as quickly as possible.
Scott Johns clarified that the RMD zone does not permit dormitories but does permit
single family residential and multiple family residential as well as group home uses.
Development requirements in the RMD zone require a developer to adequately address lighting,
ingress/egress, parking lot screening, . and landscaping issues. A single. family development
would not be required to specifically address such improvements.
In response to a question from Commissioner Kalish, Mr. Olsen responded that
stormwater in the area drains west on Highland Avenue to a point on an abutting.. property and
then disappears to a point near Race Street. Stormwater also free flows west from this site to
Race Street underground.
Commissioner Kalish repeated that she has no issues with the potential zoning of the
property as proposed, but remains opposed to the rezone due to stormwater issues that remain
unaddressed by the City although she.agreed that the existing problems should not be the burden
of a single developer. The City needs to deal with these issues.
Commissioner Kidd was adamant that the integrity of the single family neighborhood
should be retained and questioned the. indeterminate boundary that is identified on the City's
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map for the site.
Chair Rasmussen reminded members that the applicant has met the tests necessary to
apply for the rezone and that the proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Map designation for the site and the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan document
by which development is to be guided throughout the City. He stressed that the Commission
cannot consider the rezoning proposal for a specific use, such as a dormitory, but must consider
the rezone on the merits of the existing land use designation and guiding City plans. A
designation of RMD for the site would allow up to 12 units per acre or a potential of 23 units
where the current RS-7 zone allows for up to 22 units, given the platting of the lots and the
ability for each lot to potentially contain an accessory residential structure.
In response to Commissioner Kalish, Mr. Olsen noted that nursing homes are permitted
in the RMD.
Commissioner Snyder discussed the difference between the Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Map designation ofHDR and the Zoning Ordinance classification ofRMD.
219
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8, 2006
Page 4
Commissioner Kidd again questioned the intent of the High Density Residential
Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation of the site.
Commissioner Snyder agreed that the applicant has met the tests for a rezone.
Development of the site. Development of the site will require that. improvements be made to the
property that will address many of the neighbors' concerns. He therefore moved to recommend
approval of the rezone as proposed to RMD citing the following findings and conclusions:
.
Findings:
1. On December 29,2005, John Ralston submitted a request to rezone approximately 1.86
acres from Residential Single Family RS-7 to Residential Medium Density.
2. The City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is intended as the guiding document in
establishing a conceptual framework for land use decisions.
3. The location supports several other multi-family developments and is found opposite the
main BP A power substation and near Peninsula College. Medium density housing
should be located where a higher concentration of residents is compatible with existing
development.
4.
The proposed zoning would create a buffer between the BP A substation and the existing
residential zoning.
.
5. The property is described as Lots 1 through 4 Block 1 Highland View Tracts and is
situated in the southwest comer of Park Avenue and Porter Streets.
6. The subject site is currently undeveloped.
7. The purpose of the RMD zone (pAMC 17.14.010) is "to provide for a mix of single-
family, duplexes, and apartments at a density greater than single-family neighborhoods
but less than the higher densities of the RHD zone. Commercial uses are not considered
to be compatible. . Few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and then only
conditionally, because of land use impacts associated with nonresidential uses. This
zone provides for a variety in the urban land use pattern for the City's lower density
multi-family residential neighborhoods (at twice the density of the City's basic single
family residential neighborhoods) with direct access on an arterial street, usually located
in outlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable land, and serving as a transitional
use between low density residential uses and commercial/industrial uses."
8.
Residential development in the RMD zone may develop on lots 7,000 sq. ft. in size with
maximum lot coverage of 30%. The density shall not exceed two dwelling units for the
first 7,000 sq. ft. plus one dwelling unit for each additional 3,500 sq. ft. up to a maximum
of 12.44 dwelling units per acre. Residential development in the RS-7 zone requires a
.
220
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8. 2006
Page 5
minimum lot area of 7,000 square feet for each unit and maximum lot coverage of 30%.
The RS-7 zone allows for develop up to 6.22 Dwelling units per acre.
9. A rezone proposal cannot be considered a spot zone ifit meets the following tests: 1) the
parcel of land has not been singled out for special and privileged treatment; 2) the
singling out is in the public interest and not only for the benefit of the land owner; and 3)
the action is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.
10. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates properties in the area as being
located along an imprecise margin between Residential High Density and Residential
Low Density. An imprecise margin is designated to allow expansion of a particular
designation in specific instances on an individual basis.
11. The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed in its entirety with respect to the proposal. The
following elements, goals, and policies were found to be most relevant to the proposal:
Growth Management Element Goal A, and Policies A.l(a); Land Use Map Goal A and
Policy A.I, 2; Land Use Element ResidentialGoals A and Policy A.I, A.2 and Objective
1; Goal B, and C, Policy C.I, C.2, C.3, C.4; Transportation Element Goal A and Policy
A.3; goal B, and Policy R14, and Objective RI.
12.
The City's inventory of land zoned for low density (RS-7 & RS-9) is approximately
2,045 acres or 38.7%. The inventory of Residential Medium and Residential High
Density (RMD & RHO) zoned land is approximately 279 acres or 5.3%. (2003 figures)
Analysis of the buildable land supplies of various zones has shown that there are limited
medium and high-density neighborhood lands remaining undeveloped.
13. Peninsula College recently removed on campus dormitory space further exacerbating the
housing supply.
14. The public comment and notification period for the Planning Commission meeting ran
from December 29 to January 31,2006. Twelve comment letters were received from the
public as a result of the public notification process. The main issues of concern were
regarding the safety of pedestrians, mainly students walking to the elementary school,
potential activity of assumed occupants of future development, and local drainage issues.
The letters were included in staff s continued review of the proposal.
15. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance on February
1,2006.
16.
The City's Public Works and Utilities Department did not have any comment on the
rezone proposal. Utilities are presently available in the area and have recently been
upgraded to support current and future developments in the area. The Fire Department
has no objection to the rezone but notes that if medium density housing includes multi-
family dwellings (tri-plex or larger), sprinkler systems will be required.
221
~
I
I
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8, 2006
Page 6
.
17. Future development of the subject property to other than single family residential use will
require specific project review and will include conditions to address issues such as
access, parking, noise, lighting, landscaping, and environmentally sensitive review.
18. Section 17.96.100 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code identifies procedures for
amendment to (rezone) the City's Zoning Map.
Conclusions:
1. The proposal is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map.
2. The site is adjacent to both Park Avenue and Porter Street, both of which are collector
arterials and school walking routes. Future development proposals should anticipate the
necessity to install sidewalks for the provision of safe. walking conditions along the
school walking routes.
3. The site can provide a logical transition between land uses that will not adversely impact
the existing development in the area.
4.
The rezone is compatible with the surrounding zoning and land uses and will allow
development of the site to a higher density that has been identified as desired for the area
by the City through its Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation.
.
5. The City's action on rezone application REZ 06-01 is consistent with the established
procedures for amending the Zoning Code set forth in Section 17.96.100, Port Angeles
Municipal Code.
6. Municipal utilities in the area are adequate to supply power, water, communications, and
sewer for multiple family housing development in the area. Ultimate development plans
may require further improvement by the developer. As no. adverse impacts to
neighboring streets are. anticipated and street, walkway, parking, and. drainage will also
be required with subsequent development, the proposed rezone is in the public interest.
7. The proposal will provide additional much needed property for the development of
multiple family housing units, which is in the public interest.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Matthews and was a tie vote with
Commissioners Snyder, Matthews, and Rasmussen voting in favor of the motion, and
Commissioners Kidd, Kalish, and Johnson voting against the motion. Commissioner Kalish
noted that her negative vote was to bring the drainage issue to the City's attention although she
did not oppose the rezone.
.
222
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
February8,2006
Page 7
Chair Rasmussen called a break at 8:05 p.m.
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RALSTON- ADproximately 2.79 acre site
located between Park Avenue and Hi~hland Avenue west of Porter Street:
Proposal to divide three parcels into nine residential building sites in the RS-7
Residential Single Family zone.
Associate Planner Scott Johns reviewed the Department's report recommending approval of the
subdivision with conditions. Chair Rasmussen opened the public hearing.
Steve Zenovic, 519 South Peabody, answered questions regarding development standards and
stormwater drainage plans. Chair Rasmussen closed the public hearing.
Following continued discussion on improvements required along Park Street, Commissioner
Kidd moved to recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision subject to the following
conditions and citing the following findings and conclusions:
Conditions:
1.
A lO-foot strip of land shall be dedicated to the City for the Park Avenue right-of-
way. Park Avenue shall be constructed per the City's Urban Service Standards,
which includes a paved sidewalk, curbing, and paving prior to approval of the final
plat. Street improvements shall be made to Public Works and Utilities Department
standards prior to final plat approval.
2. The fire hydrant spacing shall be as required by the City Fire Department to a
maximum 1000' of separation distance. Any multi-family residences that are
constructed shall be fitted with sprinkler systems.
3. Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground.
4. Stormwater improvement plans shall be submitted for approval per the City's Urban
Services Standards and Guidelines and constructed or bonded for prior to final plat
approval.
5. Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works
Department.
6. Building setbacks shall b€:: identified on the final plat and address numbers provided
by the Building Division shall be placed on the lots.
Findings:
1.
Chapter 16.08.ofthe Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) sets forth local requirements
for the approval of subdivisions.
223
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8, 2006
Page 8
2. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the
uniform division of land within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a
city to inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment
of a subdivision. It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited
to, the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets
or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes,
parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all
other relevant facts including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe
walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school and whether the public
interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved
unless the city can make written findings that these provisions are made.
3. Section 16.08.050(B)(1) PAMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine
the proposed plat, along with written recommendations of the City Departments, and
shall either approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be
forwarded to the City Council within a period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been
submitted to the City Planning Department. The City Council shall either approve or
disapprove the proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting.
4. The Port Angeles Public Works and Utilities, and Fire Departments reviewed the
proposed subdivision. Their comments have been incorporated in the Department's
recommendation.
5. Preliminary approval is based upon a drawing dated received December 29, 2005,
prepared for John and Gail Ralston by Zenovic and Associates.
6. The subject property is partially identified as Low Density Residential with the northern
portion located in an indeterminate boundary between Low Density Residential and High
Density Residential on the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
7. The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The following
Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth
Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A.2, Goal B, Policy
B.1, B.2, B.3, and EA, Goal C; Transportation Element Goal A, Policy A.3, A.6, and
A.11; Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goal
A, B, PolicyB.1, B.3, BA, B.5, B.6, B.7, C.1, C.2, C.3, CA, C.5, and C.7.
8. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer
service and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9).
9. The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Policy B.3) states that development
should be designed to further the grid system pattern. Preliminary approval will be based
upon the dedication of right-of-way to ensure compliance with the policy.
10. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Residential, Single
Family, RS-7, which allows a density of up to 6.22 dwelling units per acre. The
proposed drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least
7,050 square feet in size. .
224
.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8, 2006
Page 9
.
11. The site is currently served by Park Avenue and Porter Streets which are. collector
arterials and designated school walking routes.
12. There are no environmentally sensitive areas on the site. The site slopes slightly
downward from the southeast to the west. The site is not considered a frequently flooded
area as it is not listed on the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) maps which
denote those areas that are in 100-year flood areas.
13. Transit service is available along Lauridsen Boulevard, . located approximately ~ mile
north of the site.
14. Building permits are required for all structures on the completed sites. All local building
and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler
systems.
15. The Port Angeles School District has been notified of the development to allow them to
plan for needed public school facilities and routes. The nearest school bus stop is located
at Mt. Angeles Road and Park Avenue.
16. All utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in
the area.
17. The City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments will serve the site.
18. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance (DNS #1139) on February 1, 2006, therefore satisfying the City's
responsibility under the Act.
19. Improvements to Park Avenue will be required such that the final roadway is an
improved width of 40-feet with curb and a 6' pedestrian sidewalk established on the south
side per the City's development standards. A 10-foot dedication of right-of-way will be'
required along the south side of Park Avenue and a 30-foot dedication along the north
side of Highland Avenue will be required. The dedication of land for Highland Avenue
will include adequate area to construct a cul-de-sac at the west end of Highland Avenue.
Porter Street currently meets City standards.
20. The Planning Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The
Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval.
Reports are advisory only to ensure conformance of the proposed subdivision to.. the
general purposes of the City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and
specifications adopted by the City.
Conclusions:
.
C.
As conditioned, the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance,
Chapter 16.08 PAMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW.
As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and
general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
225
A.
B.
Planning Commission Minutes
February8,2006
Page 10
.
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that
assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school.
D. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting of this subdivision as
articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The
subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City. of Port Angeles
consistent with the Growth Management Act.
Commissioner Kalish seconded the motion which passed 6 - O.
BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN mSIP) - PORT OF PORT
ANGELES: Proposal for a BSIP of a 26.9 acre property zoned Industrial Heavy
at the Fairchild International Airport property.
Principle Planner Nathan West presented the Department's report recommending
approval of the Binding Site Improvement Plan. Chair Rasmussen opened the public hearing.
(Susan Bauer, Port of Port Angeles Planning and Environmental Manager, had been in
attendance but had to leave the meeting prior to this issue being discussed.)
There being no one to speak to the issue, Chair Rasmussen closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Snyder moved to approve the BSIP as proposed citing the following
conditions, findings, and conclusions: .
Conditions:
1. The legal descriptions for Lots 1-23 shall be provided to the Planning Department
consistent with the survey for the Airport Industrial Park Phase I dated January 20, 1978,
and. subj ect to new building setback requirements, landscape buffers, .and infrastructure
improvements.
2. All streets and utilities, including stormwater drainage improvements, shall be brought
into compliance with the City's urban services standards and shall be dedicated to the
City.
3. Except for discrepancies between minimum standards or dimensions noted in BSIP 99-01
final approval, more restrictive standards contained in Zoning Regulations, Building
Codes, or other official regulations shall apply.
4. Building setbacks consistent with the current Zoning Code shall be identified on the final
BSIP 99-01 and address numbers placed on the lots, which will be provided by the
Building Division.
5.
A thirty-five foot buffer of mature trees and ground vegetation shall be reestablished
where needed and maintained along the W. 18th St. frontage for the purpose of screening
residential uses north ofW. 18th St. from airport industrial park noise and visual impacts.
.
226
.
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8. 2006
Page 11
6; Sidewalk shall be developed along the frontage of the property abutting W. 18th Street to
the Public Works Department standards.
7. Stormwater improvement plans shall be submitted for approval per the City's urban
services standards and made prior to final plat approval.
8. A circulation system incorporating appropriate provisions and providing sufficient area
for safe pedestrian activity to the site from the street and from building to building within
the site shall be submitted for Planning Commision approval at the time of BSIP 99-01
final approval.
9. A plan for industrial park amenities including but not limited to facilities for pedestrian
and other alternate nonmotorizedmodes of transportation, the public transit system, and
industrial park design concepts shall be submitted for Planning Commission approval at
the time of BSIP 99-01 final approval and installed within six years of the time of the
BSIP 99-01 final approval.
10. A description of the facilities shared by the development complex of mixed commercial
and/or industrial businesses shall be provided and the system of common management of
those facilities shall be described on the face of the BSIP 99-01 final mylar.
. Findings:
1. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58..17 contains the State's guidelines for the
uniform division ofland within the State of Washington, and Section 58.17.035 sets out
requirements that the City is following for binding site improvements plans.
2. Chapter 16.10 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) sets forth local requirements
for the approval of binding site improvement plans. .
3. Twenty standards and criteria, which must be met prior to approval of a BSIP, are listed
in PAMC 16.10.040.
4. Section 16.10.030 P AMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine BSIP
applications for proposals exceeding 5 acres in size, along with written recommendations
of the City Departments, and shall either approve, approve with conditions, or deny the
BSIP within the time requirements of Chapter 18.02 PAMC.
5. The Port Angeles Planning, Public Works, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed
BSIP. Their comments have been incorporated in the Department's recommendation.
6.
Review of the proposal by the City's Fire, Public Works, and Planning Departments
resulted in proposed conditions.
.
227
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8. 2006
Page 12
.
7. Preliminary approval is based upon two drawings: one dated January 20, 1978, andthe
other dated received January 26, 1999, prepared for the Port of Port Angeles.
8. The subject site is 35.5 acres located in Suburban Lots 123, 124, 125, 144, 145, and 146
southofW. 18th Street and is known as the North Fairchild (Airport) Industrial Park.
9. The property has to a large exteIlt already been developed following an industrial park
plan approved by the City in 1977 through an M-l Permit process then existing in the
City's Zoning Code. TheM-1 Permit was never finaledby the'dedication of the rights-
of-way and cannot be amended because the M-1 Permit process no longer exists in the
City's Zoning Code. The BSIP proposes to dedicate rights-of-way for "0" and W. 19th
Streets as well as a 20 foot wide drainage easement.
10. The property to the east and west of the subject site south ofW. 18th St. is owned by the
Port of Port Angeles and was developed prior to current urban service standards.
Property to the north of W. 18th St. is zoned for single family residential. and multiple
family uses but is only partially developed. The property to the south is used for the
William Fairchild International Airport runways.
11. The subject property is identified as Industrial on the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan
land use map and is zoned n., Industrial Light.
12.
The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The following
Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth
Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A.2, Goal G, Policy
G.l, Goal H, Policies H.1, H.2, H.3, and HA; Transportation Element Goal A, Policies
A.1, A.2, A.3, and A.6, Goal B, Policy B.9, B.l1, B.15, and B.17, Objectives B.2 and
B.3; Utilities and Public Services Element Policies AA, B.l, C.1, and C.2, Objective C.1,
Goal D, Policies D.1 and D;6; Conservation Element Policies B.111, B.13, and B.20,
Objective B.2; Capital Facilities Element Goal A, Policies A.9, A.10, and A.II, Goal B,
Policies B.I, B.2, B.3, BA, B.5, B.6, and B.7, Objective B;l, Goal C, Policies C.2, CA,
and C.7; Economic Development Element Goal A, Policies A.l, A.2, A.3, AA, A.5, A-7,
andA.IO.
.
13. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer
service and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element 'Policy A.9).
14. The site is currently accessed by W. 18th Street, which is designated as an arterial on the
City's Comprehensive Plan Circulation Map and is not improved with curb, gutter, and
sidewalk, except fora portion north ofthe subject site.
15. There are no environmentally sensitive areas on the site.
16.
All utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in
the area.
.
228
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8. 2006
Pagel3
17. The site will be serviced by the City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments.
18. The Port of Port Angeles adopted an existing Determination of Nonsignificance on
January 15, 1999, satisfying SEPA.
Conclusions:
A. As conditioned, the proposed BSIP is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive
Plan and Zoning Code.
B. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Chapter 16.10 PAMC, and the
Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW.
C. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and
general welfare and for the twenty BSIP standards and criteria.
D. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the binding site improvement plannig of
this subdivision as articulated. in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and
Zoning Ordinances. BSIP 99-01 provides for development of industrial development
within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the Growth Management Act.
Commissioner Matthews seconded the motion, which passed 6 - o.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None
STAFF REPORTS
Planner Johns reported that the City and Port staff met regarding issues regarding tall
trees at the east end of the Airport runway that are beginning to impede use of the east Airport
runway.. It is likely that a large number of the trees in Lincoln Park will need to be removed in
order to rectify the situation. The Port is working diligently to identify which trees must be
removed and if what options if any exist. Staff will continue to work closely with the Port and,
in the event that many of the trees are removed, which is likely, specific planning will include
the future use of the tree trunks and roots so that they can be used for projects such as armoring
for shoreline and stream revetment projects.
Planning Manager Roberds indicated that staff will work to plan a Comprehensive Plan
work session for the March 22 meeting so that the Commissioners are well educated on the basis
for the Comprehensive Plan and its amendment process. Commissioner Kalish asked that
Attorney Blore also attend the meeting to provide legal counsel on the matter.
229
. Planning Commission Minutes
February 8. 2006
Page 14
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
Commissioner Kidd reported that she has attended County Planning Commission
meetings and hopes to make attendance a regular occurrence to keep in touch with what the
County is working on.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Sue Roberds, Secretary
PREPARED BY: S. Roberds
230
Len Rasmussen, Chair
.
.
.
, (
EXECUTNE SESSION
7 oC
J
,/ <7
Expected length of session: ....J 0 JI4 /rh
Is action expected following the seSSion!OSJ I ,~
Reason for Executive Session:
Date:
fttrl-
_ To consider matters affecting national security.
_ To consider the selection of a site or the acquisition of real estate by lease or purchase when
public knowledge regarding such consideration would cause a likelihood of increased price.
To consider the minimum price at which real estate will be offered for sale or lease when
public knowledge regarding such consideration would cause a likelihood of decreased price.
However, final action selling or leasing public property shall be taken in a meeting open to the
public.
_ To review negotiations on the performance of public bid contracts when public knowledge
regarding such consideration would cause a likelihood of increased costs.
_ To consider, in the case of an export trading company, fmancial and commercial information
supplied by private persons to the export trading company.
_ To receive and evaluate complaints or charges brought against a public officer or employee.
However, upon the request of such officer or employee, a public hearing or a meeting open to the
public shall be conducted upon such complaint or charge.
To evaluate the qualifications of an applicant for public employment or to review the
performance of a public employee. However, subject to RCW 42.30.140(4), discussion by a
governing body of salaries, wages, and other conditions of employment to be generally applied
within the agency shall occur in a meeting open to the public, and when a governing body elects to
. take final action hiring, setting the salary of an individual employee or class of employees, or
discharging or disciplining an employee, that action shall be taken in a meeting open to the public.
~o evaluate the qualifications of a candidate for appointment to elective office. However,
any interview of such candidate and final action appointing a candidate to elective office shall be in
a meeting open to the public.
_ To discuss with legal counsel representing the agency matters relating to agency enforcement
actions, or to discuss with legal counsel representing the agency litigation or potential litigation to
which the agency, the governing body, or a member acting in an official capacity is, or is likely to
become, a party, when public knowledge regarding the discussion is likely to result in an adverse
legal or financial consequence to the agency.
1
.'
Closed session under RCW 42.30.140:
_ To discuss proceedings concerned with the formal issuance of an order granting, suspending,
revoking, or denying any license, permit, or certificate to engage in any business, occupation, or
profession, or to receive a license for a sports activity or to operate any mechanical device or motor
vehicle where a license or registration is necessary; or
_ Meeting of a quasi-judicial body relating to a quasi-judicial matter between named parties
as distinguished from a matter having general effect on the public or on a class or group.
_ Matters governed by chapter 34.05 RCW, the Administrative Procedure Act.
_ Collective bargaining session with employee organization, including contract negotiations,
grievance meetings, and discussions relating to the interpretation or application of a labor agreement
or a portion of a meeting which the governing body is planning or adopting the strategy or position
to be taken by the governing body during the course of any collective bargaining, professional
negotiations, or grievance or mediation proceeding, or reviewing the proposals made in the
negotiations or proceedings while in progress.
Time session began:
/() : () (J
Time session ended:
Jfft, ~
/1~(}tO
Was session extended by
announcement:
yeS
,
If so, when:
/rJ :;)0
.80(l~, J..)p^-
City Clerk
G:\LEGAL\FormsIEXECUTIVE SESSION-I O-17-05.wpd