Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 04/04/2006 . J3~~, WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 321 EAST FIFTH STREET April 4, 2006 REGULAR MEETING - 6:00 p.m. ~RTANGELES Note: The Mayor may determine the order of business for a particular City Council meeting. The agenda should be arranged to best serve' the needs and/or convenience of the Council and the public. The items of business for regular Council meetings may include the following: A. CALL TO ORDER - Regular Meeting (6:00 p.m.) B. ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC CEREMONIES, PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation in support of Genealogical Society B-1 Days April 7 -8 2. Presentation ofGFOA Award for Financial B-3 Reporting 1. Present proclamation to member of Clallam County Genealogical Society 2. Mayor to accept award C. WORK SESSION 1. 81h Street Bridge Replacements Decision C-l 1. Reject bids/consider redesign '1 D. (1) LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON THIS OR FUT)JRE AGENDAS as determined by City Manager or Council member. / (2) PUBLIC COMMENT. This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the City Council about anything. To allow time for the Council to complete its legislative agenda, comments should be limited to no more than 5 minutes per person and a total of 15 minutes for this comment period. (These time periods may be lengthened or shortened at the discretion of the Mayor). E. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS F. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC " ..HEARINGS: 1; Anderson Street Vacation, STY 06-01 F-l 1. Public hearing continued from March 21, 2006/close public hearing/second reading & adopt Ordinance G. RESOLUTIONS H. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 1. Heritage Court Subdivision (12th/O St) 2. Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision (P St & Milwaukee Dr) 3. 2005 Financial Year End Report H-l H-25 1. Approve preliminary subdivision 2. Approve preliminary subdivision H-51 3. Presentation/accept report April 4, 2006 NOTE: HEARING DEVICES A V AILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - 1 I. PUBLIC HEARINGS - QUASI-JUDICIAL (7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter) 1. Bradow Rezone, REZ 06-01 PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER 1. Lunderville Street Vacation, STV 05-04 2. Solid Waste Rate Adjustments K. FINANCE 1. Equipment Purchase - Asphalt Paver 2. Department of Ecology Coordinated Prevention Grant G0600218 L. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City Council Minutes of March 21, 2006 regular meeting. 2. Expenditure Approval List: 3 /11/06 - 3/24/06, $2,558,575.95 3. Shane Park Renovation Project 05-04, Accept Completion 4. Combined Sewer Overflow Renovation Projects 05-24, Accept Completion I-I 1. Open public hearing/first reading of Ordinance/continue hearing to Apri118th J-l 1. Open public hearing/first reading of Ordinance/continue hearing to April 18th 2. Presentation/open public hearing/first reading of Ordinance/continue hearing to April 18th J-21 K-l K-3 1. Reject bids 2. Accept grant L-1 Accept Consent Agenda L-ll. L-33 L-35 M. INFORMATION 1. City Manager Reports 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated 2/22/06 M-l 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated 3/8/06 M-13 4. Park Commission Minutes: January & February M-27 5. Change Orders, Contracts Under $15K, Bids & M-35 Grants 6. Quarterly Consultant Report M-37 7. Police Department Monthly Report: January M-41 8. Resignation from Parks, Recreation & M-49 Beautification Commission N. EXECUTIVE SESSION (As needed and determined by City Attorney) One item under RCW 42.30.140(4)(a) - discuss contract negotiations One item under RCW 42.30.11O(1)(i) - discuss with legal counsel potentialligitation O. ADJOURNMENT April 4, 2006 NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - 2 ~ORTANGELES WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. I. CITY COUNCIL MEETING CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING: n. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mayor Rogers Deputy Mayor Williams Councilmember Braun Councilmember Erickson Councilmember Headrick Councilmember Munro Councilmember Wharton Staff Present: Manager Madsen Attorney Bloor Clerk Upton G. Cutler D. McKeen T.Riepe y. Ziomkowski vi \I v" V vi ~,d: V April 4~ 2006 If) 00 (\. "n\ . I m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by: (J 1U.u..{a..l.~ ~Ji -- dJuuJ..~~ ~ J · ~ORTAN'GELES WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. DATE OF MEETING: April 4. 2006 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Attendance Roster LOCATION: City Council Chambers I Iv. 7 {- hi. ~ f2/ ~ A p~ 13@A[~~~I'1. ?J"D[ 0. ~ Sf. ~ I *) So T3 _S1: (1 { ( IEr 7 11 Ac,... f? I 03 tAI/ %+h f fL 3/2 IA), s!:i 51, f?)1, City of Port Angeles ~ORTANGELES Ordinance/Resolution Distribution List WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. City Council Meeting of April 4. 2006 ~. ~<J~ )( k " ~+ J I) /I /n~ rI^ City Manager City Atty. (1) ,/ Planning I ./ City Clerk ~ I I / Codifier (1) ,./ Personnel Cust. Svcs. Finance Dir. /Mgr. Police Oept, Fire Oept, Light Oept, Parks & Rec. MRSC (1) I .I PON (Summary) - , Extra Copies / ').. n VI J' /i I v"" '} IJ '()()J 11 I V' ,"~OO~ / t/ I TOTAL I () PROCLAMA TION In Recognition of Genealogical Society Days April 7th - 8th, 2006 WHEREAS, the Washington State Genealogical Society promotes the preservation of, and access to, public and private genealogical and historical information; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Genealogical Society issues a Washington State Pioneer Certificate to all who can prove their ancestors lived in the Territory of Washington before November 11, 1889; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Genealogical Society consists of a combination of individual members and local, county, and regional genealogical organizations who share by newsletter, information about genealogical activities and resources; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Genealogical Society has eight regions, and in each of those regions, representatives conduct workshops and seminars in an effort to educate interested individuals on how to locate their ancestors and advise them of new technological advances that allow for easier access and more conclusive research; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Genealogical Society sponsors an annual conference with nationally known speakers and mini sessions to encourage and assist members 'and others in the pursuit of genealogical research; and WHEREAS, the Olympia Genealogical Society will host the Washington State Genealogical Society's Annual Conference and Business Meeting on April 7-8, 2006, at the Olympia High School. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Karen A. Rogers, Mayor, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF PORT ANGELES, do hereby proclaim April 7-8, 2006 "Washington State Genealogical Society Days" and I encourage the citizens of Port Angeles to join with me in acknowledging this event and organization for promoting the importance of genealogy in the preservation of family, past, present and future. April 4th. 2006 Karen A. Rogers, Mayor . . B-4 . . . . WASHINGTON, U.S.A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO DATE: April 4, 2006 To: CITY COUNCIL Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities ~f./..u FROM: SUBJECT: 8th Street Bridge Replacements, Bid Action, and Redesign Summary: Bids exceeded the engineer's estimate by over 50% and our funds available by $9 million. Our engineering consultant, Santosh Kuruvilla, President of Exeltech Consulting, will be making a short presentation on the overruns and options to bring the project within our funding limitations. Additional WSDOT funds are not available for award. A decision by Council is required at this meeting to award or reject the bids. The preliminary estimated cost for redesign is $750,000 and additional WSDOT design funds are not available. Our consultant, Exeltech, has stated that they are willing to complete the redesign at a reduced cost. Recommendation: Reject the bids and authorize the Director of Public Works & Utilities to enter into negotiations with Exeltech for the redesign. Background/Analysis: Throughout the bridge type selection process we have made informed decisions to end up with bridges that would meet the City's current and future transportation needs, were aesthetically pleasing, minimized environmental and potential archaeological impacts, and minimized traffic impacts during construction. During the final stages of design it became apparent that, due to the rising costs of steel, there was a potential for exceeding the available funding for the project. Changes were made in response to WSDOT [mal review comments as well as our own consultant's suggestions in an effort to offset these rising costs. Prior to advertising, the engineer's base bid estimate of $16,866,000 was reviewed by the WSDOT staff. This base estimate along with construction management and other anticipated construction phase costs remained within the $20,000,000 BRAC funding cap for the eligible construction project costs. Bids for the project were opened February 10,2006, and the apparent low responsible base bid was $25,876,000 or $9,000,000 (53%) over the engineer's estimate. The five other bids received ranged from $25,900,000 to $29,500,000 verified that the engineer's estimate was significantly low. Our engineering consultant, Exeltech, Inc., has evaluated the bids and discussions with all bidders to obtain possible reasons for the significant gap between the engineer's estimate and the bids received. Santosh Kuruvilla, President of Exeltech Consulting, will be making a short presentation on the overruns and options to bring the project within~ur funding limitations. We have contacted WSDOT, State, and Federal representatives regarding additional funding to award the project. No additional funding is available. To award the project, as bid, the City would have to fund the $9,000,000 shortfall. Funds are not available. In a meeting with WSDOT, C - 1 N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\8th St Bridge Replacements, Bid Action and Redesign.doc April 4, 2006 City Council Re: 8lh St Bridge Replacements, Bid Action and Redesign Page 2 regarding the bidding and available options, discussions focused on revisions to the current design. It was clear, that even with further revisions, the steel structures will be not be within our limited . funding abilities. It is recommended that Council reject the bids. The only viable option, at this time, is a redesign of the replacements to concrete five or six span structures. The revised structures, as viewed from above, would be similar to the current design except for the reduction of the shoulders (bike lane) from 8 to 5 feet in width. Composite plan and profiles of the five and six span concrete structures are attached. The utility and approach plans would only need minor revisions to accommodate the width reductions and the majority of the permitting will not have to be redone. The options for architectural railings and lighting can remain as designed. In that it is federally funded, we will need to have public meetings regarding the changes and will have to revisit the environmental permits for the placement of additional support piers. This added permitting requirement is not anticipated to pose a problem. Another area that could provide significant cost savings is to construct both bridges at once. This will shorten the construction times and reduce the overall detour times, but will result in an increased impact on those using the detours, especially the "island" businesses and residents. The redesign of the bridges is estimated to cost $750,000 and would take 10 months, essentially adding a year to the project. Additional funding from WSDOT was requested along with a sharing of the redesign costs between WSDOT, Exeltech, and the City. This was rejected, but staffwill continue to pursue this at higher levels within WSDOT and with our legislators. Santosh Kuruvilla, President of Exeltech Consulting, has stated his willingness to adjust his fees for the redesign and permitting, in view of the engineer's estimate shortfall. It is recommended that the City continue . with Exeltech, due to their knowledge of the permitting and design, and enter into negotiations regarding the reduced fees for the redesign and permitting. Construction engineering fees would be renegotiated later, following redesign. Enc: Concrete Structure Composite Plan and Elevation (5 and 6 span). . c - 2 .....1 CJ CD Q) 0).0' -cJ ... ._i a. ...: . a:lS ......, C"'. CD ~- ~..I ~ j;.:.: E en CO CJ .c CI ~.' - CO a. ell ~.' tII, ~.'.'.' . * "".... .~............ ~:i~. ca.,.:"..:" d ~ .~. ft ., .....1 (.)......", ~! . -; CD' .C . "'-""1'< '.' ~) () 11M ,-.. <( D. ,,- ,... ' l;l...:.~ }l f(~.. ~~ '. .~. ;T u " " {fJ'1 . co -; w c.......;. ... .-..,~.,"' I CD.... ,...............'....'.... . ~: c(.....,............. J".' """,-'. \- . ~ (I) .- ~ ~.. t/) ~ 00. o =.s cat/) UJ-C.. ~ .(j) c: >< -= >, (I)' CD U) cu' EZ ~ ~ g-g "0 -C (.) CG ...... .- CD mmo:: A.AA , ~ \......i A.'.' /1 If' It.' .. .. . ~i Bid Results - February 10, 2006 ~ ~-I \,~# THrt: CITY OF }lOa" ~iS Base Bid including Alternates LJ Engineer's Estimate - LJ Bid Ranges · Low Bid - · High Bid - · Average Bid - $18.1 Million $26.4 Million $29.9 Million $28.1 Million Bid Results - Alternates Alternate A - Architectural Illumination System CJ Engineer's Estimate - $263,000 CJ Bid Ranges · Low Bid - $22,000 $255,000 $187,000 · High Bid - · Average Bid - ~ ~J \ 'l ,~~ Alternate B - Architectural Bridge Railing CJ Engineer's Estimate - $312,000 CJ Bid Ranges · Low Bid - · High Bid - · Average Bid - . $285,000 $499,000 $392,000 THE CITY OF po.1ANGlUS Bid Analysis. Overview - What happened? 'T~isk($2.5 Million over Engineer's Estimate) '.Mobilization ......~Schedule and Liquidated Damages ii~Temporary Bridges Steel ($ 4.1 Million over Engineer's Estimate) -Suppliers - USI, Thompson Steel, Fought Fabrication, Oregon Iron, and several others in Utah and the mid-west -Sole Source Supplier - USI went bankrupt, Thompson Steel too busy, and FoughtiFabrication& Oregon Iron Joint~Ventured -High Strength versus Low Alloy Steel -National Steel Suppliers/Fabricators are extremely busy -Metalizing ~ \~ ,~ Superstructure Erection ($1.2 Million over Engineer's Estimate) -Contractors chose not to use existing trestle Miscellaneous ($0.8 Million over Engineer's Estimate) -Bearings THE CITY OF -Shoring P-'ANtlIii~ -Steel Pipe Piling What did contractors have to say? r:l Slant Leg Design is a unique and good design All contractors agreed that Low Bid is good value for the Slant Leg Design 1:1 Both Low Bidders indicated: · They desire to negotiate · They can build Prestressed Concrete Girder Type Bridges within the $20 Million Budget ~ ~..,~~ \,~ , poWi~t.JS Bid Analysis Overview Recommendations and Next Steps >Reject all Bids due to inadequate funding > Proceed with Conventional Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridge Design ~ \!?' >Re-Advertise in Dec,ealba,[,2QQi THE CITY OF ,- po.r~tlS ~ i~.) \,~ poal~US Conventional Design -Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridge -Five or Six Span Arrangement -Concrete Piers in the Valley -Redesign Challenges -Permitting -Reopening Public Process ("II! 1.14 .."'~. V'li C::~:"~ \ 0.."'\ ...... l . '''': ~ fA CUt ....1..... ... 0......."'.............. t '4 ," .~.l~.. .~ . Flm . . . ~. jO"R'jT""~: , N' mG.....E...'L-.E.....'S'., . .. ...' -.. . , -": ' ;: ..: .... ,~ ,... " ..' . - . " ,,": . . : .._.....,." ..:- ",i _ : :' ~ 'I . ..I.' . m mm:',mm .. '_.m.' ...........' WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. C I T y' C 0 U N elL M E M 0 DATE: April 4, 2006 To: CITY COUNCIL FROM: Sue Roberds, Planning Manager SUBJECT: ANDERSON STREET VACATION - STY 06-01 PORTION OF "P" STREET AND 16TH STREET Summary: V acation of right-of-way. Backe-round / Analvsis: On March 21; 2006, the City Council conducted a public hearing in review of a petition for the vacation of a portion of the unopened "P" Street right-of-way located south of Milwaukee Drive and a portion of 16th Street between Milwaukee and Reyes Street (see attached map); A first reading of an ordinance approving vacation of the right-of-way took place on March 21, 2006. The remaining action is then to conduct the second reading and concur with the Planning Commission and staffs recommendation to vacate the right-of-way. Staff will be available for' questions. ./ Attachments: Ordinance, [mdings, and conclusions T:\FORMSICouncilmemoanderson.wpd F - 1 . . . F - 2 .t-;; . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, vacating portions of "P" Street and Sixteenth Street, in Port Angeles, Clallam County, Washington. WHEREAS, a petition is on file with the City of Port Angeles to vacate portions of "P" Street and Sixteenth Street in Port Angeles, Clallam County, Washington; and WHEREAS, street vacations are categorically exempt from the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) rules as set forth in WAC 197-11-800(2)(h); and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the City Council following public notice ~ pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW; and . WHEREAS, said vacation appears to be of benefit to and in the interest ofthe public; and WHEREAS, the City Council fmds $1.86 per square foot to be the fair market value of the vacated right-of-way; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows: Section 1 - Vacation. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, the following right-of-way, as depicted on Exhibit "A", is hereby vacated: . The east half of "P" Street lying south of the south margin of Milwaukee Drive and abutting Suburban Lot 83; and the north 5 feet of Sixteenth Street abutting Suburban Lot 83, and a westerly prolongation of said north five feet to the centerline of "P" Street, Townsite of Port Angeles, all in Clallam County, Washington. -1- F - 3 Section 2 - Compensation. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.030, the compensation required for the vacation ofthis street is $26,863.42. Section 3 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective only upon the payment of the required $26,863.42. Upon that satisfaction, the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish this Ordinance and to file a certified copy with the Clallam County Auditor and the Clallam County Assessor. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 4th day of April, 2006. ATTEST: Becky J. Upton, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William E. Bloor, City Attorney PUBLISHED: April 9, 2006 By Summary G:\Legal_ BaokupIORDINANCES&RESOLUllONS\2006-07.AndersonSTV .031406. wpd March 29, 2006 -2- F - 4 MAYOR . . . . .~ . . Legend ,:/ tzj parcel Street centertine L:J parcel selection / .._._,,"C ~... ( ,."'...... .....,..... '" '~'''- P Street (40') Stofferahan In /:rj >< ::r: H lJj H 1-3 Anderson STY 06-01 "P" Street/16th Street - :J;ol . . . F - 6 . . . Findings: 2. 4. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF STREET VACATION PETITION - STY 06-01 - ANDERSON: 1. A petition requesting vacation of that portion of the unopened "P" Street right-of-way south of Milwaukee Drive and north of 16th Street and the north 5' of 16th Street abutting Suburban Lot 83 was submitted on January 10,2006. Abutting properties are owned by the petitioners Mr. Charles Anderson and David Stofferahan. RCW 58.17 requires the signatures of two thirds of abutting property owners to be valid when a vacation of right-of-way is proposed. The subject petition is signed by 100% ofthe abutting property owners. Abutting properties are zoned RS-9 and RS-11 Residential Single Family and those that are developed contain single family structures. The RS, Residential Single Family zones allow the basic single family development uses including accessory structures with lot coverage up to 30%. The City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map were reviewed for consistency with the proposed vacation of right-of-way. Land Use Map Goal, Policies, and Objective Element Goal A is relevant to the proposal. The City of Port Angeles' Real Estate Committee met on February 13, 2006, and established a value for the unopened right-of-way. The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the Washington Administrative Code. The site was posted for a land use action on February 22, 2006, with required publication notification in the Peninsula Dailv News on February 26, 2006. At its February 21,2006, regular m~eting, the Port Angeles City Council established a public hearing date by resolution for action on the street vacation petition as March 21, 2006. The Real Estate Committee of the City Council discussed compensation for the right-of-way and decided upon a value of$1.86 per square foot. The Port Angeles Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed street vacation on March. 8, 2006. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Conclusions: A. The unopened right-of-way serves no purpose to the current or long range transportation needs of the City. The proposed vacation will place unused property on the City's tax roles and therefore, the vacation serves the public interest. B. The vacated right -of- way will be consolidated with surrounding residential property and shall be developed in a manner consistent with the RS-9 zone which would therefore be in compliance with Section 17.11 ( RS-9 Zone) ofthe Port Angeles Municipal Code. F - 7 Anderson STV 06-01 Findings and conclusions Page 2 . C. The proposal is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan specifically Land Use Map Goal, Policies and Objective Element Goal A. Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of April 4, 2006. Karen A. Rogers, Mayor Becley J. Upton, City Clerk . . F - 8 . DATE: To: FROM: FORTAN ELES WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. CITY ,COUNCIL MEMO APRIL 4, 2006 E PLANNER CITY COUNCIL SCOTT K. JOHNS, SUBJECT: OF HERITAGE COURT SUBDIVISION Summary: The subdivision of 4.14 acres into 15 residential lots. Recommendation: Approve preliminary subdivision citing 9 conditions, 23 findings, and 4 conclusions in support of the action. Backe:round I Analvsis: On March 8, 2006, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed a preliminary subdivision proposal to create 15 residential lots on a 4.14 acre site. The property is located on the north side of 12th Street east of its intersection with "0'1 Street. The subdivision is located in the RS-9 zone. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the project citing 9 conditions. There were no specific issues raised during the public hearing, however, neighbors asked questions regarding existing stormwater patterns in the area and how storm water would be addressed by the development. Steve Zenovic of Zenovic and Associates, responded to questions to'stormwater issues. The Council's review is a public meeting. Staff s report is attached for your review. Staff will be available to respond to questions. . Attachment: Condition, findings, and conclusions Planning Commission minutes excerpt Staff Report T:\SUB\Heritage Court\CityCouncilmemo.doc . H - 1 . . . H - 2 CONDITIONS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF HERITAGE COURT SUBDIVISION: . Conditions: 1. The interior street shall be identified and shall be dedicated and constructed per the City's urban service'standards, including a 34-foot travel area with curb and gutter prior to approval of the final plat. 2. The applicant shall dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way along the entire frontage of 12th Street. . . 3. The fire hydrant spacing shall be as required by the City Fire Department to a maximum 1000' of separation distance. Residences shall be fitted with sprinkler systems. Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground. Prior to final plat approval, water service shall be extended to the lots as required by the Public Works Department. Stormwater management plans per the City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines shall be submitted to Public Works and Utilities Department for review and approval, and installed prior to final plat approval. Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works Department from 1ih Street and shown on the preliminary plat. Building setbacks shall be identified on the final plat and address numbers placed on the lots, which will be provided by the Building Division. Twelfth Street improvements shall be made to Public Works Department standards prior to final plat approval. A total 34-foot wide paved surface with standard curb is required. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Findings: 1. Chapter 16.08 ofthe Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) sets forth local requirements for the approval of subdivisions. RCW 58.17. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision. It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to,.the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written findings that these provisions are made. Section 16.08.050(B)(1) PAMCprovides that the Planning Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written recommendations of the City Departments, and shall either approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City Planning Department. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting. 2. 3. H - 3 The Port Angeles Public Works and Utilities, Light, Parks, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed Subdivision. Their comments have been incorporated in the Department's recommendation. Preliminary approval is based upon a drawing dated received January 13,2006, prepared for LBR Construction Co. Inc. by Zenovic and Associates. The subject property is identified as Low Density Residential on the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan land use map. The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most relevantto the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A.2, Goal B, Policy B.1, B.2, B.3, and BA, Goal C; Transportation Element Goal A, Policy A.3, A.6, and B.11; Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goal A, B, Policy B.l, B.3, BA, B.5, B.6, B.7, Goal C, Policy C.1, C.2, C.3, CA, C.5, and C.5. 8. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer service and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9). 9. The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Policy B.3) states that development should be designed to further the grid system pattern. Preliminary approval will be based upon the dedication of right-of-way to ensure compliance with the policy. 10. The subject property is identified on the Port Angeles Zoning Map as RS-9 Residential Single Family, which allows a density of up to 4.84 units per acre. The proposed drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 9,000 square feet in size. 4. 5. 6. 7. The site is currently served by 12th Street, which is neither an arterial, a designated school walking route, or a designated bicycle route. "a" Street, which abuts the western 70 feet of the subdivision is a collector arterial. 12. Transit service is available along "N" Street east of the site. 13. Building permits are required for all structures on individual building lots. All local building and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler systems. 11. 14. The Port Angeles School District has been notified of the development to allow them to plan for needed public school facilities and routes. School busses currently operate on "N" Street and 14th Street. The Port Angeles School District evaluates school bus routes on an annual basis. 15. All utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the area and will be extended to the newly created lots in the subdivision. 16. The City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments will service the site. 17. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS #1144) on March 1,2006, therefore satisfying the City's responsibility under the Act. 18. Improvements to 1ih will be required such that the final roadway is an improved width of 34 feet with a standard curb. . 19. The Port of Port Angeles operation of the Fairchild International Airport is located in the area south of the site. The Port staff has been notified of the proposed subdivision proposal and it is expected that those who purchase properties in the final subdivision will be aware of the existing on-going airport operation. H - 4 . . . . . . ,', ;,.;~ ,. ';' ,- ;,,;~" c.:" 20. The Planning Commission's decision is~ recommendation to the City Council. The Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval. Reports are advisory only to ensure conformaIlce of the proposed subdivision to the general purposes of the City's Corrtprehensive Plan and to planning standards and specifications adopted by the City. 21. There are no environmentally sensitive areas on the site. The site has a minimal slope to the north. The site is not considered a frequently flooded area and is not listed on the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) maps which denote those areas that are within 100-year flood areas. 22. The City's Parks Department has noted that they are aware of the preliminary proposal and do not believe the level of service for the area will be hampered as a result of the development. The City's LOS for parks and recreational services is 1/3 acre for 1,000 population. An undeveloped wooded property donated to the City for a park use is located less than 1'2 mile northeast of the subject site along "N" Street. The nearest public playground area is located approximately one mile northeast (Crown Park) or one and a quarter mile southeast (Lincoln Park). 23. The Port Angeles School District has been notified of the development to allow them to plan for needed public school facilities and routes. The Port Angeles School District provides school bus pick-up for students at Hamilton Elementary School and Stevens Middle School at 12th and, "N" Streets. ( Conel usions: 1. As conditioned, the proposed Subdivision is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. As conditioned, the proposal is cotlsistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 PAMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting of this subdivision as articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the Growth Management Act. 2. 3. 4. Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of April 4, 2006. Karen A. Rogers, Mayor , Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk H - 5 . . . H - 6 . . . Planning Commission Minutes March 8, 2006 Page 4 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - HERITAGE COURT: 12TH Street east of"O" Street: Development of a 4.14 acre property into 15 residential building sites in the RS-9 Residential Single Family zone. Commissioner Matthews noted for the record that the applicant constructed his home but he felt that he could act fairly on the matter before the Commission. No one objected to his remaining to act on the issue. Associate Planner Scott Johns reviewed the Department's report recommending approval of the preliminary subdivision with conditions. Chair Kidd opened the public hearing. Steve Zenovic, 519 South Peabody #22 represented the applicant and stated that the cul-de- sac design is pretty straight forward with stand infrastructure development. Mary Robuck, 2508 West 1 Uh Street is an adjacent property owner and asked what the size of the lots will be and how stormwater will be handled. Steve Zenovic, 519 South Peabody #22 responded by explaining the proposed utility development on-site and that stormwater would be directed to an existing collection system in "N" Street. There will be some subsurface detention and post runoff will not exceed pre runoff amounts. Lot sizes will exceed that required in the RS-9 Residential Single Family zone of9,000 square feet per site. Mary Robuck said that she had filed a formal complaint with the City's Engineering Department regarding stormwater problems in the area but had not heard back regarding her concerns. Planner Johns noted that, on a site visit to the subject property, he encountered one ofthe City's engineering staff who was investigating the complaint, and he was sure that the individual would respond shortly to Mrs. Robuck. V ort Gavin, 2510 West 1 Uh Street is also a nearby property owner and asked for clarification as to long range utility development plans in the area. Chair Kidd directed Mr. Gavin to call the City's Public Works and Utilities Department for those answers as staff in attendance is not able to answer those long range questions. Chair Kidd also asked ifthe applicant is designing sidewalks within the development? Mr. Zenovic answered that sidewalks are planned for the subdivision interior. There being no further questions, Chair Kidd closed the public hearing. Following brief discussion, Commissioner Johnson moved to recommend approval ofthe proposed subdivision citing the following conditions, findings, and conclusions: Conditions: 1. The interior street shall be identified and shall be dedicated and constructed per the City's urban service standards, including a 34-foot travel area with curb and gutter prior to approval of the final plat. 2. The applicant shall dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way along the entire frontage of 12th Street. 3. The fire hydrant spacing shall be as required by the City Fire Department to a maximum 1000' of separation distance. Residences shall be fitted with sprinkler systems. 4. Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground. H - 7 Planning Commission Minutes March 8,2006 Page 5 5. Prior to final plat approval, water service shall be extended to the lots as required by the Public Works Department. . 6. Stormwater management plans per the City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines shall be submitted to Public Works and Utilities Department for review and approval, and installed prior to final plat approval. 7. Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works Department from 12th Street and shown on the preliminary plat. 8. Building setbacks shall be identified on the final plat and address numbers placed on the lots, which will be provided by the Building Division. 9. Twelfth Street improvements shall be made to Public Works Department standards prior to final plat approval. A total 34-foot wide paved surface with standard curb is required. Findings: 1. Chapter 16.08 ofthe Port Angeles Municipal Code (P AMC) sets forth local requirements for the approval of subdivisions. RCW 58.17. 2. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.1 10 requires a city to inquire . into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision. It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written findings that these provisions are made. 3. Section 16.08.050(B)(I) PAMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written recommendations ofthe City Departments, and shall either approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City Planning Department. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting. 4. The Port Angeles Public Works and Utilities, Light, Parks, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed Subdivision. Their comments have been incorporated in the Department's recommendation. 5. Preliminary approval is based upon a drawing dated received January 13, 2006, prepared for LBR Construction Co. Inc. by Zenovic and Associates. The subject property is identified as Low Density Residential on the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan land use map. . 6. H - 8 ... q., Planning Commission Minutes March 8. 2006 Page 6 The proposal has been revieweti with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A.2, Goal B, PolicyB.l, B.2, B.3, and BA, Goal C; Transportation Element Goal A, Policy A.3, A.6, and B.ll; Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goal A, B, PolicyB.1, B.3, B.4, B.5, B.6, B.7,Goal C, PolicyC.l, C.2, C.3, CA, C.5, and C.5. 8. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer service and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9). 9. The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Policy B.3) states that development should be designed to further the grid system pattern. Preliminary approval will be based upon the dedication of right-of-way to ensure compliance with the policy. 10. The subject property is identified on the Port Angeles Zoning Map as RS-9 Residential Single Family, which allows a density of up to 4.84 units per acre. The proposed drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 9,000 square feet in size. 11. The site is currently served by 12th Street, which is neither an arterial, a designated school walking route, or a designated bicycle route. "0" Street, which abuts the western 70 feet of the subdivision is a collector arterial. . 7. . . Transit service is available along "N" Street east of the site. Building permits are required for all structures on individual building lots. All local building and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler systems. 14. The Port Angeles School District nas been notified ofthe development to allow them to plan for needed public school facilities and routes. School busses currently operate on "N" Street and 14th Street. The Port Angeles School District evaluates school bus routes on an annual , basis. 12. 13. 15. All utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the area and will be extended to the newly created lots in the subdivision. 16. The City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments will service the site. 17. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS #1144) on March 1, 2006, therefore satisfying the City's responsibility un~er the Act. 18. Improvements to 12th will be required such that the final roadway is an improved width of 34 feet with a standard curb. . 19. The Port of Port Angeles operation ofthe Fairchild International Airport is located in the area south of the site. The Port staff has been notified of the proposed subdivision proposal and it is expected that those who purchase properties in the final subdivision will be aware ofthe existing on-going airport operation. The Planning Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval. Reports are advisory only to ensure conformance ofthe proposed subdivision to the general purposes 20. H - 9 Planning Commission Minutes March 8. 2006 Page 7 of the City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and specifications adopted by . the City. 21. There are no environmentally sensitive areas on the site. The site has a minimal slope to the north. The site is not considered a frequently flooded area and is not listed on the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) maps which denote those areas that are within 100- year flood areas. 22. The City's Parks Department has noted that they are aware of the preliminary proposal and do not believe the level of service for the area will be hampered as a result of the development. The City's LOS for parks and recreational services is 1/3 acre for 1,000 population. An undeveloped wooded property donated to the City for a park use is located less than Y:z mile northeast of the subject site along "N" Street. The nearest public playground area is located approximately one mile northeast (Crown Park) or one and a quarter mile southeast (Lincoln Park). 23. The Port Angeles School District has been notified ofthe development to allow them to plan for needed public school facilities and routes. The Port Angeles School District provides school bus pick-up for students at Hamilton Elementary School and Stevens Middle School at 12th and "N" Streets. Conclusions: A. As conditioned, the proposed Subdivision is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. B. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 PAMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW. C. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school. D. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting ofthis subdivision as articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances.1 The subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the Growth Management Act. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Beier and passed unanimously. . . H - 10 . . . pORT A.NGELES .. .L ... WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTDEP ARTMENT FROM: Scott Johns, Associate Planner DATE: March 8, 2006 RE: Preliminary Subdivision - APPLICANT: LBR Construction Co. Inc. OWNER: Same LOCATION: North side of 12th Street, east of "a" Street. The property is described as being a portion of Lot 56, except tax #706 & 3056 & except street right-of- way within the Townsite of Port Angeles. PROPOSAL: Subdivide a 4.14 acre site into 15 residential building lots. PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS: The 4.14-acre site is situated on the ndrth side of 1ih Street at-its intersection with "0" Street. The site is somewhat triangular in shape and is slightly rolling with a maximum grade of approximately 6%. The site is currently undeveloped and contains scattered trees and brush. The property is zoned RS-9, Residential Single Family. The areas surrounding the proposed development include the Samara Woods subdivision to the south across 1 ih Street, a single family residence to the north, the as yet undeveloped subdivision of the North Peninsula Builders Association to the east, the Rolling Hills subdivision is under construction to the southwest with undeveloped land to the west. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: The Fire Department commented that: · This new subdivision is outside of the Port Angeles Fire Department 4-minute response area. In accordance with Port Angeles Municipal/Code, all of the homes must be fitted with residential fire sprinkler systems and outside alarm bells. · The site plan shows a fire hydrant where lots 3 and 15 meet. This hydrant should be relocated to the southwest corner of lot 3, on the corner at the intersection with 1ih Street. TheCitv Light Department commented that: · Electrical service is to be extended from the south side of 1ih Street ~"""'=,=-:O='==--==.-;::=---===.=.':",",=.o.:.=.:<::;""..;:":;:::;::..,;.======.~~."~=,,,,,,,,,"",=,",,:;:"-<,===.c--=:r':::'==".~"._'_=.==="==;::<':;:="=,","='''''''''-7==~_~~==~__"'_"'_~-=""===:'=__'___~.'_'_~~":;~"'='==__._'._._==-==.-::==-..:::,== H - 11 Heritage Court Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 2 · After all lot configuration has been finalized and at the developer's request, Electrical Engineering will prepare a design and a cost estimate for installation of the underground electrical facilities. . The Public Works and Utilities Department had no concerns with the proposed division but will reqUIre: · Utilities are to be extended to the site. · Water and sanitary sewer are located in lih Street · A dedication of right-of-way along 1ih Street will be required. · Storm drainage information with calculations must be provided. On site detention is required. . Curb and gutter is required. The Buildin!! Department did not comment. PUBLIC COMMENT: Property owners within 300 feetofthe proposed subdivision were mailed notice of the proposal on February 10,2006. The property was posted on February 13, 2006, and publication appeared in the Peninsula Daily News on February 14,2006. No comments were received. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: . Designation The Comprehensive Plan establishes the long range goals and policies of the City. It is the basis upon which City officials are to make land use decisions. Any project proposed in the City must be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map identifies the site as Low Density Residential (LDR). Low Density Residential designation allows an overall residential density ofa project to range up to 7 units per net acre. It is intended to be for the development of single-family homes. The site development proposal results in a development 'of3.9 units per net acre. Specific Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies, and Objectives relevant to this application are listed in Attachment "B" to this staff report. ZONING: The Zoning Ordinance is the primary implementing ordinance for the Comprehensive Plan. It establishes what types of uses are permitted and where they may be located in the City. It also establishes minimum design standards for such uses. Like the Comprehensive Plan, any project proposed in the City must be consistent with the regulations of the zone in which it is located. The Zoning Map identifies the site as Residential Single Family (RS-9). Specific zoning requirements are listed in Attachment "B"., SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE Chapter 16.08: The City's Subdivision Ordinance (No. 1631), codified as Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code, has been reviewed with respect to the proposal. Although the entire ordinance has . not been cited, the development standards and policies found to be applicable have been cited in Attachment "B": H - 12 :-=';'=~";"~-=--=':"'==:-~=~='====----'--==''::'''''''-''''''';:='''-_..._=--=-===--=-__._.___':.==.;:.-=='==--=-_~_~==;;"=-:::..."......:====-._..w~.,===____~., __=======~ . . . Heritage Court Subdivision March 8, 2006 Pag'" 3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Determination of Non-Significance (DNS No. 1144) was issued for the proposal on March 1,2006. No environmentally sensitive areas exist on the site. DEPARTMENTAL ANALYSIS: The subdivision sketch indicates a 15-10t subdivision of a 4. 14-acre site. The lots range in size from 9,000 square feet to 15,855 square feet. The subdivision will have access through an interior road that extends north from W. lih Street and terminates with a cul-de-sac. The internal street is to be located within a 60-foot right-of-way dedicated to the city. The street will be constructed with a 34-foot travel surface with curbing. The internal street has yet to be named. Four lots will access directly off ofW. lih Street. West 12th Street will be designed and built to the standards of a 34-foot travel surface with curb and gutter. No sidewalks are included in the proposal. Twelfth Street is neither an arterial street nor a school walking route. "0" Street is a collector arterial but not a school walking route. Currently school bus service is available on "N" Street. Clallam Transit service is also available at 1 ih and "N" Street. The nearest city park area is the undeveloped site at 1 Oth and "N" Street. The lots range in size from 9,000 square feet to 15,855 square feet, which meet s the minimum lot size for the RS-9 zone. Lot # Size Depth (avg) Width (avg) Access 1 9,000 120 75 W. 12tlJ Street 2 9,000 120... 75 . W. lilli Street 3 9,000 120 75 Cul-de-sac 4 9,000 120 75 Cul-de-sac 5 9,000 120 75 W, 12tn Street 6 11,040 120 100 W. 12th Street 7 15,855 174 85 Cul-de-sac . 8 11,155 128 92 Cul-de-sac 9 9,000 120 75 Cul-de-sac 10 10,500 120 77 Cul-de-sac II 9,920. 102 116 Cul-de-sac 12 11,070 98 93 Cul-de-sac 13 10,285 88 106 Cul-de-sac 14 10,375 115 81 Cul-de-sac 15 11,665 120 90 Cul-de-sac DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: The Department recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision with the conditions, findings, and conclusion identified in Attachment "A" to this staff report. Attachments: A Findings and Conclusions B Application MaterialsH _ 13 Heritage Coun Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 4 ATTACHMENT "A" . Conditions: 1. The interior street shall be identified and shall be dedicated and constructed per the City's urban service standards, including a 34-foot travel area with curb and gutter prior to approval of the final plat. The applicant shall dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way along the entire frontage of Iih Street. The fire hydrant spacing shall be as required by the City Fire Department to a maximum 1000' of separation distance. Residences shall be fitted with sprinkler systems. Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground. Prior to final plat approval, water service shall be extended to the lots as required by the Public Works Department. Stormwater management plans per the City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines shall be submitted to Public Works and Utilities Department for review and approval, and installed prior to final plat approval. Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works Department from Iih Street and shown on the preliminary plat. ' Building setbacks shall be identified on the final plat and address numbers placed on the lots, which will be provided by the Building Division. Twelfth Street improvements shall be made to Public Works Department standards prior to final plat approval. A total 34-foot wide paved surface with standard curb is required. . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Findings: 1. Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) sets forth local requirements for the approval of subdivisions. RCW 58.17. 2. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform division ofland within the State of Washington. Section58.I7.110 requires a city to. inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision. It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can mal(e written findings that these provisions are made. Section l6.08.050(B)(I) PAMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written recommendations of the City Departments, and shall either approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City Planning Department. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting. 3. . H - 14 _ _.. ====-___.=-=--=~__.,~__;.._=====c..""""=_== -:..._~--=-"""":::':==--=--===~=-=--"'---::=..-==-==.=-....:::;:::..,...--===='"-==,==.;=-- --_-:'_-~--===--=== 12. Transit service is available along "N" Street east of the site. , 13. Building permits are required for all structures on individual building lots. All local building and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler systems. 14. The Port Angeles School District has been notified ofthe development to allow them to plan for needed public school facilities and routes. School busses currently operate on "N" Street and 14th Street. The Port Angeles School District evaluates school bus routes on an annual basis. All utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the area and will be extended to the newly created lots in the subdivision. The City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments will service the site. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS #1144) on March 1,2006, therefore satisfying the City's responsibility under the Act. Improvements to 12th will be required such that the final roadway is an improved width of 34 feet with a standard curb. . 9. . 10. 11. 15. 16. 17. . 18. Heritage Court Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 5 4. The Port Angeles Public Works and Utilities, Light, Parks, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed Subdivision. Their comments have been incorporated in the Department's recommendation. 5. Preliminary approval is based upon a drawing dated received January 13,2006, prepared for LBR Construction Co. Inc. by Zenovic and Associates. 6. The subject property is identified as Low Density Residential on the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan land use map. 7. The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are foung to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A,2, Goal B, Policy B.l, B.2, B.3, and BA, Goal C; Transportation Element Goal A, Policy A,3, A.6, and B.ll; Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goal A, B, Policy B.l, B.3, BA, B.S, B.6, B.7, Goal C, Policy C.l, C.2, C.3, CA, C.5, and C.5. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer service and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9). The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Policy B.3) states that development should be designed to further the grid system pattern. Preliminary approval will be based upon the dedication of right-of-way to ensure compliance with the policy. The subject property is identified on the Port Angeles Zoning Map as RS-9 Residential Single Family, which allows a density of up to 4.84 units per acre. The proposed drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 9,000 square feet in size. The site is currently served by 12th Street, which is neither an arterial, a designated school walking route, or a designated bicycle route. "0" Street, which abuts the western 70 feet of the subdivision is a collector arterial. 8. H - 15 Heritage Court Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 6 The Port of Port Angeles operation of the Fairchild International Airport is located in the area south of the site. The Port staff has been notified of the proposed subdivision proposal and it is expected that those who purchase properties in the final subdivision will be aware of the existing on-going airport operation. The Planning Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval. Reports are advisory only to ensure conformance of the proposed subdivision to the general purposes of the City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and specifications adopted by the City. 21. There are no environmentally sensitive areas on the site. The site has a minimal slope to the north. The site is not considered a frequently flooded area and is not listed on the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) maps which denote those areas that are within 100- year flood areas. 19. 20. 22. The City's Parks Department has noted that they are aware of the preliminary proposal and do not believe the level of service for the area will be hampered as a result of the development. The City's LOS for parks and recreational services is 1/3 acre for 1,000 population. An undeveloped wooded property donated to the City for a park use is located less than Yz mile northeast of the subject site along "N" Street. The nearest public playground area is located approximately one mile northeast (Crown Park) or one and a quarter mile southeast (Lincoln Park). The Port Angeles School District has been notified of the development to allow them to plan for needed public school facilities and routes. The Port Angeles School District provides ) school bus pick-up for students afHamilton Elementary School and Stevens Middle School at 12th and "N" Streets. 23. Conclusions: , A. As conditioned, the proposed Subdivision is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. B. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 PAMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW. C. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school. D. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting of this subdivision as articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the Growth Management Act. T:\SUB\Heritage Court\Heritage Court Staff Report. doc H - 16 . . . . . . Heritage Court Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 7 ATTACHMENT B COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan establishes the long range goals and policies of the City. It is the basis upon which City officials are to make land use decisions. Any project proposed in the City must be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The following goals and policies appear to be the most relevant to the proposal: Designation The Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map identifies the site as Low Density Residential (LDR). Low Density Residential allows an overall residential density of a project to range up to 9 units per net acre and is intended to be for the development of single-family homes. The site development proposal results in a development of 9 units per net acre. The following goals, policies and objectives have been identified as being the most relevant to the proposed subdivision: IV. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Goal A: To manage growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial to the community as a whole, is sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals and is consistent with the State of Washington's Growth Management Act. v. LAND USE ELEMENT Goal A: To guide current and future development within the City in a manner that provides certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the challenges and opportunities of the future. Policy A.2: All land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council and/or any of its appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and its land use map. Goal B: To have a community where residential development and use of the land are done in a manner that is compatible with the environment, the characteristics of the use and the users, and the desired urban design of the City. Policy B.1: Urban services shall be available for all residential areas as required by the Capital Facilities Element concurrency policy. Policy B.2: Single-family lots should be of reasonable shape and should have access provided by an alley or by a local access street or a collector arterial. Policy B.3: All residential developments should be designed with the provisions of fire protection and service vehicle access as key factors in the street design and circulation pattern. For efficient circulation, rights-of-way should be obtained and improvements made to further the grid street pattern of the City. Cul-de-sacs may be permitted when designed as an integral part of the major grid street pattern of the City. Policy B.4: All residential developments should be encouraged to preserve and capitalize on existing unusual, unique, and interesting natural features, should preserve and utilize natural vegetation, should utilize and preserve scenic views, should maximize southern exposures, should offer protection from prevailing winds, and should be designed to minimize energy use. H - 17 Heritage Court Subdivision March 8, 2006 p~ap R -0'" ... Goal C: To have a community of viable districts and neighborhoods with a variety of residential opportunities for personal interaction, fulfillment and enjoyment, attractive to people of all ages, characteristics and interests. . VI. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Goal A: To develop a coordinated, multi-modal transportation system which serves all areas of the city and all types of users in a safe, economical, and efficient manner. Policy A.3: The collector arterial streets and local access streets should serve primarily local traffic with special emphasis on safety for pedestrian traffic. Policy A.6: Planning for transportation services and facilities (including public streets, bikeways, pedestrian walkways, and public and private air, marine and land transit services and facilities) shall be performed consistent with the goals and policies of the Capital Facilities Element. Policy B.ll: New arterial streets, local access streets, and alleys should be designed and constructed to conform to the Statewide National Functional Classification System for Federal Aid Systems, WSDOT, and Transportation Improvement Board minimum design standards and standards as adopted by the City. VII. UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT Policy C.2: All new utility services should be underground. . x. CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Goal A: To provide and maintain safe and financially feasible urban services and capital facilities at or above stated levels of service to all City residents and the general public. Goal B: To provide urban streets and utilities at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the general public. Policy B.1: All arterial streets shall function at an average daily level of service ofD or better. Policy B.3: The City shall not approve any development that is not served with water service at or greater than the following level of service standards at the time of development: Single family units: 2 gallons per minute @ 30 psi (fire - 1,000 gallons per minute @ 20 psi). Policy B.4: The City shall not approve any development that is not served with sewer service at or greater than a level of service standard of 300 gallons per day per person at the time of development. Policy B.5: The City shall not approve any development that is not served with electrical service at or greater than a level of service standard of 120/220 volts per service at the time of development. Policy B.6: The City should not approve any development that increases a site's post- development stormwater run-off beyond that allowed by the Stormwater Management . Manual for the Puget Sound Basin as adopted by the City. H - 18 . . . Heritage Court Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 9 Policy B.7: The City should not approve any development that cannot be served with telecommunications service at or greater than the following level of service standards at the time of deyelopment: telephone, residential: 1 service per unit / cable television, residential: 1 service per unit. Goal C: To provide urban services at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the general public. Policy c.t: The Port Angeles School District should develop a capital facilities plan, which the City will consider for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan. The capital facilities plan should contain at least a six-year plan for public financing of such facilities as may be necessary to provide adequate public schools at or greater than the following level of service standards in order to meet anticipated increases in student enrollment, which may be anticipated based on the School District's projected enrollment figures and residential growth as provided for in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan: High School: 125 square feet of permanent, appropriate educational space per student, Middle School: 104 square feet of permanent, appropriate educational space per student, and Elementary School: 100 square feet of permanent, appropriate educational space per student. If capacity is inadequate to house students at the established level of service standards (LOS) and adequate school funding is not available, then the demand for new facilities will be reduced (e.g. through year round use of schools. or by matching grade band enrollment to facility capacities) or the level of service standards will be reduced to keep both schools and housing development affordable to the majority of Port Angeles School District residents. Imposition of Growth Management Act impact fees on or denial of new development will not be used as a measure to prevent further degradation of school services, unless the reduced level of service standards are deemed unacceptable to Port Angeles School District No. 121, Clallam County, and the City of Port Angeles. Policy C.2: The City should not approve any development that will not be served with adequate transit service as determined in the comprehensive service and facilities plan for transportation within six years from the time of development. Policy C.3: The City should not approve any development that will not be served at or greater than a city-wide level of service standard of 9 acres of parks per 1,000 population within six years from the time of development. . Policy C.4: The City should not approve any development that will not be served at or less than the following level of service standards at the time of development: Police: 677 persons per one officer. Fire: 4-minute response time or residential sprinkler system installation. Policy C.5: The City should not approve any development that will not be served with solid waste collection service at or less than a city-wide level of service standard of 400 pick up accounts per 1000 population within six years from the time of development. ' Policy C.7: The City should consider the cumulative effect of development on the City's need for adequate public service buildings. ;:;:,..o:.~:;'''1;'L~--~_'''=='''===..;:<=",=.:::;=..",.,.t::;:::...-:;:,==--...."==.==,,,",,'~'~''"'7=_'='=='::"==-=-~"'''===~"i:<====.=~-:;:,,--=:=.-=;:-.=====,..,.._===-=---==-,=,"-=-~===-=,="",==o-..-===,""=_;:==-==':=---:='.:::":::=--==~~-=;=._._::. H - 19 Heritage Court Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 10 Zoning The Zoning Map identifies the site as Residential Single Family (RS-9). The purpose and intent of this zone is as follows: . "This is a low density residential zone intended to create and preserve urban single family residential neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family homes on larger than standard Townsite-size lots. Uses which are compatible with and functionally related to a single family residential environment may also be located in this zone" The minimum lot area is 9,000 square feet. All lots shall comply with the minimum area and dimensional requirements as follows: Side, abutting a street Maximum Height: Lot Coverage: 25 feet 25 feet, except 1 0 feet for detached accessory buildings in the rear one-third of the lot. 8 feet, except 3 feet for detached accessory buildings in the rear one-third of the lot. I 18 feet 3 0 feet 30% Front: Rear: Interior Side: SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE (No. 1631 as amended): The City's Subdivision Ordinance (No. 1631), codified as Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code, has been reviewed with respect to the proposal. Although the entire ordinance has not been . cited, the following development standards and policies have been found to be applicable: 16.08.060 - Standards and Policies. A. GENERAL STANDARDS. If a proposed street and/or lot pattern for any zone in Port Angeles has been made by the Council or the Commission, the street layout of any new plat submitted shall be in general conformance to said pattern or plan. Otherwise proposed streets in new subdivisions shall conform to the Comprehensive Plan and Urban Services Ordinance as adopted. No plan for the platting, replatting, subdivision, or dedication of any area shall be recommended for approval by the Commission unless streets shown therein are connected by surfaced road to an existing improved public right-of-way adequate to serve the existing and new lots. Where the Comprehensive Plan or the City's official street plan indicates the necessity of a new right-of-way of a required width or portion thereof for street purposes, whether within a new plat or new subdivision, or along the boundaries of a new plat, new subdivision or new lot, such required right-of-way or portion thereof shall be dedicated to the City of Port Angeles by the filing of a plat. The Planning Commission may require plats to provide areas for parks, playgrounds, open spaces, recreation facilities, schools, school grounds, safe walking conditions on school routes, transit stops, and drainage ways. Each proposed subdivision and the ultimate use of the land therein shall be in the interests of public health, safety and welfare, and subdividers shall be prepared to present evidence to this effect when requested by the Commission. Restrictive covenants not contrary to existing regulations regarding the use of land, governing and binding all future owners of lots or tracts, may be shown on any plat. . H - 20 . . . Heritage Court Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page I! No Final plat of land within the force and effect of existing Zoning Regulations shall be approved unless it is conforming with such Regulations. Whenever there isa discrepancy between minimum standards or dimensions noted herein and those contained in Zoning Regulations, Building Codes, or other official Regulations, the highest standard shall apply. B. GENERAL PRINCIPLES, POLICIES. The Commission shall ensure that appropriate provision is made for: (1) the harmonious development of neighborhoods by requiring coordination of streets within subdivisions with existing or planned streets, or with other elements of the Comprehensive Plan; (2) adequate open spaces for recreation, schools, light and air; (3) distribution of population and traffic which will create conditions favorable to public health, safety and convenience. C. STREETS. 1. The arrangement, character, extent, width, grade and location of all streets shall conform with the Comprehensive Plan, the Capital Facilities Plan, the Urban Services Ordinance, and the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines, and shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned roads, to topographic conditions, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed uses of the land to be served by such roads. 2. Where such is not shown on the Comprehensive Plan, the arrangement of streets in a subdivision shall either provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing streets in the surrounding area; or shall conform to a street plan for the neighborhood, approved by the City, to meet a particular situation where topographic or other conditions make continuance or conformance to existing streets impracticable. This shall also apply to cluster subdivisions. 3. If a street plan for an area has been made by the City, the street layout of a proposed subdivision in such an area shall be in general conformance to the plan. 4. When a portion of a subdivider's tract is to be subdivided, a street plan for the entire tract shall be submitted to indicate how the street pattern of the plat submitted will coordinate with the entire tract when fully platted and with streets in the surrounding area. 5. Where a tract is subdivided into lots or tracts larger in area than twice the minimum lot size, the City may require an arrangement of lots and streets such as to permit a later re-subdivision in , conformity with the street and lot requirements specified in these Regulations. 6. Where a proposed subdivision abuts or contains an existing or proposed arterial street or is adjacent to an existing or planned business, commercial or industrial district, the City may require treatment as may be necessary (1) for the adequate protection of residential properties; and (2) to afford separation of through and local traffic. 7. Where a subdivision borders or contains a railroad or limited access highway right- of-way, the City may require a road approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way at a distance suitable for appropriate use of the intervening land. Such distances shall also be determined with due regard for the requirements of approach grades and future grade separations. 8. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles. Acute angle intersection shall be avoided. 9. There shall be no reserve strips controlling access to roads, except where the control of such strips is definitely placed with the City under conditions approved by the Commission. 10. Sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school shall be provided pursuant to RCW 58.17.060 and 58.17.110. ..''''==..;;..-=:.-=--==--==,,=='W.....-....<:;"~-=.-===~.=--.:'''''';;:;:;''''.~7..=.~:.:;=.=,"..:".,,''=.~=::;=""~"'==.:='""";.:!.~=..:::,==-=;:."'"""====""'"..,,:==.__._..,~-=:.--~-- --===-===.:::.~==::::.=..::-.:;"--._ --==-~-=--=-=====-~= H - 21 Heritage Court Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 12 . E. LOTS. 1. The lot area, width, depth, shape and orientation, and the minimum building setback lines shall be appropriate for the location of the subdivision, for the type of development and land use contemplated, and for the type of street systems planned for the area, and shall conform with the requirements ofthe Zoning Ordinance. 2. Excessive depth in relation to width shall be avoided. No lot shall have a depth greater than three times its width. 3. Comer lots for residential use shall have extra width to pennit appropriate building setback from and orientation to both streets. 4. To ensure public health, convenience and safety, the subdividing of land shall provide, by means of a public street, each lot with direct access to an existing public street that is . improved to City street standards. 5. Double frontage and reverse frontage lots shall be avoided, except where essential to provide separation of residential development from arterial streets or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. A planting screen easement across which there shall be no right of access shall be provided along the line of lots abutting such a principal arterial street or disadvantageous use. 6. Side lot lines shall be substantially at right angles or radial to street lines and front lot lines. 7. No lot or lots for residential purposes shall be divided or sold into additional lots or building sites, without compliance with Title 16 P AMC. . S. SIGNAGE One (1) free standing sign no larger than twenty-four (24) square feet in area shall be permitted for identification of the subdivision. . H 22 ==--==--=-=,--=--= .=~-"'="'_----=---=---==""==- -..==..-.=",,- = I .' ....,_........ ,.f '-,. .. ...i \' ."" .J , I . . -{f.:t- . , , ..... " . --1.\......,.... I ~ ./ .- ~f; ':'.1 i .~..J.. i '. /" ! ;~.. ',,, -...--..../.. I-~i.=., l 'W !:: , U1" .---- '~"-'I""i. :"-. i : ""'''',...,--r' ..... ..-.: )I, II ~f i II' ~ .c .....\ \ \ I i I'. ....----.., I f -===..."""'......"."c,.,;."__ ----"r-'==.......- ;:;;;=:======.=-='=~==-- . . . H - 24 I . . . DATE: To: FROM: Dor 'R;'~T' A IN, "Gr 'B....'L. E';'S" 1=-' p' "'n · .. ...... ...' '.', , WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. CITY.COUNCIL MEMO APRIL 4, 2006 / SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY ApPROV A OF JUAN DE FUCA BLUFFS SUBDIVISION Summary: The subdivision of 10.16 acres into 24 residential lots. Recommendation: Approve preliminary subdivision citing the attached 9 conditions, 22 findings, and 5 conclusions. Backg:round / Analvsis: On March 8, 2006, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed a preliminary subdivision proposal to create 24 residential lots on a 10.16 acre site located on the northwest comer of the unopened 14th and "P" Streets. The site is located in the RS- 9 zone. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 6 - Ito recommend approval with 9 conditions. The dissenting vote was based on concerns regarding stability of the marine bluff. Development in critical areas is addressed in detail in Section 15.20 PAMC. A geotechnical report submitted after the Planning Commission meeting indicates that the stability of the bluffhas been adequately addressed in the proposaL The Council's review is a public meeting. Staffs report is attached for your review. Staff will be available to respond to questions. Attachment: Condition, findings, and conclusions Planning Commission minutes excerpt Staff Report ) T:\SUB\Hopf Juan de Fuca Bluffs\CityCouncilmemo.doc H - 25 . . . H - 26 CONDITIONS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF WAN DE FUCA BLUFFS SUBDNISION: . Conditions: 1. The interior street shall be dedicated and constructed per the City's urban service standards, which includes a 24- foot travel surface, roadside vegetated swales for drainage, and 4-foot sidewalks prior to approval of the final plat. Signage shall be placed on the internal street indicating that on-street parking is prohibited. The fire hydrant spacing shall be as required by the City Fire Department to a maximum 1000' of separation distance. Residences shall be fitted with sprinkler systems. Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground. Prior to final plat approval, water service shall be extended to the lots as required by the Public Works Department with an 8-inch main. Stormwater improvement plans shall be submitted for approval per the City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines and installed prior to final plat approval. Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works Department from Milwaukee Drive and shown on the preliminary plat. Building setbacks shall be identified on the final plat and address numbers provided by Public Works and Utilities Department placed on the lots. The applicant shall place a statement. on the plat and make it known to all subsequent purchasers of subject lots that said lots are in the proximity of the William R. Fairchild International Airport and that the Port of Port Angeles does not warrant that these lots will always be outside the lowest noise contour currently established for residential use. Fourteenth Street and "P" Street improvements shall be made to Public Works Department standards prior to final plat approval. The applicant shall improve the north 12 plus 10 feet of 14th Street with curb, gutter, and a 6-foot wide sidewalk "pi' Street shall be improved to a total 24-foot travel width with vegetated drainage swales and a A- foot wide concrete sidewalk along the west side. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. . 9. . Findings: 1. Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) sets forth local requirements for the approval of subdivisions. RCW 58.17. . 2. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision. It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written findings that these provisions are made. H - 27 13. 14. 15. 3. Section 16.08.050(B)(1) PAMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written recommendations of the City Departments, and shall either approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City Planning Department. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting. The Port Angeles Public Works, Light, Parks, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed Subdivision. Their comments have been incorporated in the Department's recommendation. . 4. 5. Preliminary approval is based upon a drawing dated received January 27,2006, prepared for Kenneth Hopf by 4 Seasons Engineering. 6. The subject property is identified as Low Density Residential on the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan land use map. 7. The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth Management-Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A.2, Goal B, Policy B.1, B.2, B.3, and BA, Goal C; Transportation Element Goal A, Policy A.3, A.6, and B.l1; Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goal A, B, Policy B.l, B.3, BA, B.5, B.6, B.7, C.2, C.3, CA, and C.5. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer service and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9). The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Policy B.3) states that development should be designed to further the grid system pattern. Preliminary approval will be based upon the dedication of right-of-way to ensure compliance with the policy. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Residential Single Family RS-ll, which allows a density of up to 3.96 dwelling units per acre. The proposed drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 11,000 square feet in size. The site will be served by 14th Street, which is neither an arterial, a designated school walking route, or a designated bicycle route. The marine bluff along the north side of the site is considered an environmentally sensitive area. The appropriate buffer area from the bluff is indicated on the plan. The site is generally level with only a slight slope from south to north. The site is not considered a frequently flooded area as it is not listed on the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) maps which denote those areas that are in 100-year flood areas. 8. 9. . 10. 11. 12. The closest transit service is available along "N" Street east of the site. "N" street at the intersection of 1 Oth is the nearest school walking route. The Port Angeles School District evaluates school bus routes and school walking routes on an annual basis. The Port Angeles School District has been notified of the development to allow them to plan for needed public school facilities and routes. School busses travel on "Nil Street. Building permits are required for all structures on the platted lots. All local building and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler systems. . H - 28 . . 16. All utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the area. 17. 18. The City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments will service the site. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS #1145) on March 2, 2006, therefore satisfying the City's responsibility under the Act. Improvements to the internal roadway and "P" Street will be required such that the final roadway is an improved width of24 feet with a vegetated drainage swale and a 4' concrete sidewalk established on one side per the City's suburban low impact development standards. Improvements to 14th Street will require 27 feet of paved travel surface with curb, gutter, and a 6-foot concrete sidewalk on the north side. The Port of Port Angeles operation of the Fairchild International Airport is located in the area south of the site. The Port staff has been notified of the proposed subdivision proposal and it is expected that those who purchase properties in the final subdivision will be aware of the existing on-going airport operation. The City's low impact development standards in suburban areas adopted earlier in 2003 were adopted with the understanding that subdivisions developed under the standards would not allow for on-street parking. Site development and design for residential lots developed under the iower impact standards need to accommodate resident parking and visitor parking on-site. Roadside drainage swales developed under lowjmpact development standards should be kept free of debris by adjacent property owners. The Planning Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval. Reports are advisory only to ensUre conformance of the proposed subdivision to the general purposes ofthe City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and specifications adopted by the City. 19. 20. 21. 22. 1. Concl usions: 2. 3. 4. 5. . As conditioned, the proposed Subdivision is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. , As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 PAMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school. Signage educating residents and visitors to the prohibition of on-street parking should be included in the conditions for subdivision approval in those areas developed under the City's low impact development standards in order to prevent public safety issues that could result if on-street parking clogged streets that are allowed to be reduced in size. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting of this subdivision as articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the Growth Management Act. ( H - 29 Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of April 4, 2006. . Karen A. Rogers, Mayor Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk ~ . . H - 30 Planning Commission Minutes March 8, 2006 Page 8 . . PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - JUAN de FUCA BLUFFS: 14th Street west of "P" Street: Development of a 10.16 acre site into 24 residential lots in the RS-ll Residential Single Family zone. Associate Planner Scott Johns reviewed the Department's report recommending approval of the subdivision and responded to several questions specific to development near the bluff critical area of the site. Mr. Johns explained that individual lot owners will need to discuss site specific clearing proposals prior to any such activity in those areas designated to be environmentally sensitive along the marine bluff. He spoke regarding circulation between the subject proposal and a recently approved subdivision to the east of"P" S~eet (Walker Subdivision) in the area. In response to Commissioner Beier regarding the bluff setback, Mr. Johns stated that the City requires a minimum 50' setback from environmentally sensitive marine bluff features unless an engineering report requires a more restrictive setback. Other geologic hazard reports for properties in the area have varied from a required 50' to as much as 75' of setback from the bluff. Geologic hazard reports are always required for development of properties that contain established environmentally sensitive areas. Chair Kidd opened the public hearing. There was no one present to speak to the issue. Chair Kidd closed the public hearing. The Commission continued a discussion regarding development of those lots near the mariq,e bluff and how best to protect the natural feature and resulting development. Commissioner Snyder moved to recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision with the following conditions, findings, and conclusions: Conditions: , 1. The interior street shall be dedicated and constructed per the City' surban service standards, which includes a 24-foot travel surface, roadside vegetated swales for drainage, and 4-foot sidewalks prior to approval of the final plat. Signage shall be placed on the internal street indicating that on-street parking is prohibited. The fire hydrant spacing shall be as required by the City Fire Department to a maximum 1000' of separation distance. Residences shall be fitted with sprinkler systems. Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground. Prior to final plat approval, water service shall be extended to the lots as required by the Public Works Department with an 8-inch main. Stormwater improvement plans shall be submitted for approval per the City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines and installed prior to final plat approval. Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works Department from Milwaukee Drive and shown on the preliminary plat. Building setbacks shall be identified on the final plat and address numbers provided by Public Works and Utilities Department placed on the lots. The applicant shall place a statement on the plat and make it known to all subsequent H - 31 Planning Commission Minutes March 8, 2006 Page 9 purchasers of subject lots that said lots are in the proximity of the William R. Fairchild International Airport and that the Port of Port Angeles does not warrant that these lots will always be outside the lowest noise contour currently established for residential use. 9. Fourteenth Street and "P" Street improvements shall be made to Public ,Works Department standards prior to final plat approval. The applicant shall improve the north ~ plus 10 feet of 14th Street with curb, gutter, and a 6-foot wide sidewalk. IIp'' Street shall be improved to l a total 24-foot travel width with vegetated drainage swales and a 4-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the west side. Findings: 1. Chapter 16.08 ofthe Port Angeles Municipal Code (P AMC) sets forth local requirements for the approval of subdivisions. RCW 58.17. 2. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision. It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including sidewalks and other)planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written findings that these provisions are made. 3. Section 16.08.050(B)(I) P AMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written recommendations ofthe City Departments, and shall either approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City Planning Department. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting. 4. The Port Angeles Public Works, Light, Parks, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed Subdivision. Their comments have been incorporated in the Department's recommendation. 5. Preliminary approval is based upon a drawing dated received January 27, 2006, prepared for Kenneth Hopfby 4 Seasons Engineering. 6. The subject property is identified as Low Density Residential on the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan land use map. 7. The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A.2, Goal B, Policy Rl, R2, R3, and BA, Goal C; Transportation Element Goal A, Policy A.3, A.6, and Rll; Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goal A, B, Policy Rl, B.3, BA, R5, B.6, R7, C.2, C.3, CA, and C.5. 7. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer service and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9). H - 32 . . . . Planning Commission Minutes March 8, 2006 Page 10 The City's Comprehensive Plan (hind Use Element Policy B.3) states that development should be designed to further the grid system pattern. Preliminary approval will be based upon the dedi~ation of right-of-way to ensure compliance with the policy. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Residential Single Family RS-l1, which allows a density of up to 3.96 dwelling units per acre. The proposed drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 11,000 square feet III SIze. 10. The site will be served by 14th Street, which is neither an arterial, a designated school walking route, nor a designated bicycle route. 11. The marine bluff along the north side ofthe site is considered an environmentally sensitive area. The appropriate buffer area from the bluff is indicated on the plan. The site is generally level with only a slight slope from south to north. The site is not considered a frequently flooded area as it is not listed on the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) maps which denote those areas that are in 100..,year flood areas. 8. 9. 12. The closest transit service is available along "N" Street east of the site. "N" street at the intersection of 1 Oth is the nearest school walking route. The Port Angeles School District evaluates school bus routes and school walking routes on an annual basis. The Port Angeles School District has been notified ofthe development to allow them to plan for needed public school facilities and routes. School busses travel on "N" Street. Building permits are required for all structures on the platted lots. All local building and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler systems. All utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the area. 13. . 14. 15. 16. 17. . The City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments will service the site. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS #1145) on March 2, 2006, therefore satisfying the City's responsibility under the Act. 18. Improvements to the internal roadway and "P" Street will be required such that the final roadway is an improved width of 24 feet with a vegetated draiQ.age swale and a 4' concrete sidewalk established on one side per the City's suburban low impact development standards. Improvements to 14th Street will require 27 feet of paved travel surface with curb, gutter, and a 6- foot concrete sidewalk on the north side. The Port of Port Angeles operation ofthe Fairchild International Airport is located in the area south ofthe site. The Port staff has been notified ofthe proposed subdivision proposal and it is expected that those who purchase properties in the final subdivision will be aware ofthe existing on-going airport operation. The City's low impact development standards in suburban areas adopted earlier in 2003 were adopted with the understanding that subdivisions developed under the standards would not allow for on-street parking. Site development and design for residential lots developed under the lower impact standards need to accommodate resident parking and visitor parking on-site. 20. 19. H - 33 Planning Commission Minutes March 8, 2006 Page 11 21. Roadside drainage swales developed under low impact development standards should be kept free of debris by adjacent property owners. The Planning Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval. Reports are advisory only to ensure conformance ofthe proposed subdivision to the general purposes ofthe City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and specifications adopted by the City. . Conclusions: As conditioned, the proposed Subdivision is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 PAMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school. Signage educating residents and visitors to the prohibition of on-street parking should be included in the conditions for subdivision approval in those areas developed under the City's low impact development standards in order to prevent public safety issues that could result if on-street parking clogged streets that are allowed to be reduced in size. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting ofthis subdivision as articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the Growth Management Act. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Matthews and passed unanimously. A. B. c. D. . E. . H - 34 . . . TO: FROM: DATE: n!()]~T~' / l\.TG~pr."p~ 1. .'.- . ~'..." ........... ......... ~ .~. .............:, --..........:.. ....,:.......' ........,.. .... .'.~....._... ....to, . :.';: ," " , ,. ",- -. . . ... ..,....... ,......,..... rL:1 FILE WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Commission Scott J olms, Associate Planner March 8, 2006 Preliminary Subdivision RE: APPLICANT: OWNER: LOCATION: PROPOSAL: Kenneth Hopf Vehna Hopf The site is located at the northwest corner of the 14th Street and "P" Street and extends north to the bluff. The property is described as being Suburban Lot 65 and a portion of Suburban Lot 60, The division ofa 10.16-acre site into24 residential lots in the RS-11 zone. PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS: The 10.16-acre site consisted of two parcels situated along the marine bluff above the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The larger lot is generally rectangular in shape with the second lot to the north being triangular in shape. The upland portions of the site are generally level with a maximum grade of approximately 2% sloping toward the marine bluff. The site is currently forested with trees of mixed ages and varieties. The property is zoned RS-ll, Residential Single Family. One single- family residence exists on the site. The existing single-family residence will remain and be located on the proposed Lot # 6 of the subdivision. . The site is situated on the marine bluff, which is considered an Environmentally Sensitive Area and requires that a 50-foot buffer of undisturbed native vegetation must remain at the top of the bluff. The area around the existing single-family residence has been cleared and landscaped to accent the view. The buffer in this vicinity is considered Previously Altered Environmentally Sensitive Area. The site is bounded on the south and east by undeveloped properties. The Ocean View residential trailer park is located to the west. The recently approved Walker subdivision is located to the east. ..---.-------..::..--. -.---=" H.- 35 ""-Juan'i:!{Fuca:lB l' ,1'f~.&tltl'di visi on . ~' \1 March 8, 2006 \ \i Paue 2 . _.~-~., t:> DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: . The Fire Department had no objections and made the following comments: 1. This new subdivision is outside of the Port Angeles Fire Department 4-minute response map. In accordance with Port Angeles Municipal Code, all of the homes must be fitted with residential fire sprinkler systems and outside alarm bells. 2. The site plan shows three fire hydrants. Ideally, the hydrants should be relocated as follows: a. The first hydrant, shown near lot # 1, should be moved to the ease, across from the southeast corner of lot # 18. b. The second hydrant, shown between lots 7 & 8, should be relocated southwest to an area between lots 4 & 5. c. The third hydrant, shown between lots 14 & 15, should be moved north to the northeast corner of lot 12. 3. As per the low impact development standards, no parking will be allowed on these 24-foot streets. The City Lhrht Department commented: · After the lot configuration has been finalized and at the customers' request, Electrical Engineering will prepare a design and cost estimate for installation of underground electrical equipment. · Underground power can be extended from 14th street and Milwaukee and looped up . to Walker Subdivision. The Public Works and Utilities Department had no concerns with the proposed division but will require: · A Clearing & Grading Permit is required prior to tree removal or earth disturbing activities. . 14 tl1 Street improvements shall include: o Construction to City standards for curb, gutter, and 6' sidewalk is required. Improvements shall be the same as improvements to subdivisions to the east (Rolling Hills and Orchards), which in'c1ude ~ street width plus 10' asphalt road surface. · Interior streets and "P" Street improvements shall include: o Roads shall be built to suburban standards of a 24- foot travel lane width - no parking allowed - with a 4-foot concrete sidewalk. · Existing utilities: o An 8" water main in Milwaukee Drive o A 10" sewer main in Milwaukee Drive o Connections fees will be required. · Proposed utilities: o An 8" water main with fire hydrants (will require main to be connected into existing main at Milwaukee Drive for water quality issues). o Sanitary sewer to proposed Walk:er Subdivision. A pump station is required. Public Works and Utilities Department requires calculations, as added storage may be needed. . H - 36 Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 3 . o Stormwater drainage will be into the proposed lip" Street outfall (connected to Walker subdivision system). Stormwater detention plans with calculations will be required. The Building Department did not conID1ent. PUBLIC. COMMENT: Property owners within 300 feet of the proposed subdivision were mailed notice of the proposal on February 6, 2006. The property was posted on February 8, 2006, and publication appeared in the Peninsula Daily News on February 9, 2006. No comments were received. ' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Designation The Comprehensive Plan establishes the long range goals and policies of the City. It is the basis upon which City officials are to make land use decisions. Any project proposed in the City must be consistent with the goals'and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map identifies the site as Low Density Residential (LDR), Low Density Residential designation allows an overall residential density of a project to range up to 7 units per net acre. It is intended to be for the development of single-family homes. The site development proposal results in a development of 3.9 units per net acre. Specific Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies, and Objectives relevant to this . application are listed in Attac)nnent "B" to this staff report. ZONING: The Zoning Ordinance is the primary implementing ordinance for the Comprehensive Plan. It establishes what types of uses are permitted and where they may be located in the City. It also establishes minimum design standards for such uses. Like the Comprehensive Plan, any project , proposed in the City must be consistent with the regulations of the zone in which it is located. The Zoning Map identifies the site as Residential Single Family (RS-ll). Specific zoning requirements are listed in Attachment "B". SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE Chapter 16.08: The City's Subdivision Ordinance (No. 1631), codified as Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code, has been reviewed with respect to the proposal. Although the entire ordinance has not been cited, the development standards and policies found to be applicable have been cited in Attac1m1ent "B": ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Determination of Non-Significance (DNS No.1 045) was issued for the proposal on March 2,2006. The site is located adjacent to the marine bluff, which is considered an Environmentally Sensitive Area under PAMC Section 15.20. The development plan indicates that the minimum required 50-foot buffer from the top of the bluff will be observed. . H - 37 Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 4 DEPARtMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: The Department recom.rriends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision with the conditions, findings, and conclusion identified in Attachment "A" to this staff report. Attachments: "A" Findings and Conclusions "B" Application . T:\SUB\Hopf Juan de Fuca BJuffs\StaffReport Juan de Fuca Bluffs.doc H - 38 . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. . 7. 8. . Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 5 ATTACH.MENT "A" Conditions, fIndings, and conclusions in support of Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision Conditions: 1. The interior street shall be dedicated and constructed per the City's urban service standards, which includes a 24-foot travel surface, roadside vegetated swales for drainage, and 4-foot sidewalks prior to approval of the fInal plat. Signage shall be placed on the internal street indicating that on-street parking is prohibited. The fIre hydrant spacing shall be as required by the City Fire Department to a maximum 1000' of separation distance. Residences shall be fItted with sprinkler systems. Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground. Prior to fInal plat approval, water service shall be extended to the lots as required by the Public Works Department with an 8-inch main. Stormwater improvement plans shall be submitted for approval per the City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines and installed prior to fInal plat approval. Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works Department from Milwaukee Drive and shown on the preliminary plat. Building setbacks shall be identifIed on the fInal plat and address numbers provided by Public Works and Utilities Department placed on the lots. The applicant shall place a statemedi on the plat and make it known to all subsequent purchasers of subj ect lots that said lots are in the proximity of the William R. Fairchild Iritemational Airport and that the Port of Port Angeles does not warrant that these lots will always be outside the lowest noise contour currently established for residential use. 9. Fourteenth Street and "P" Street improvements shall be made to Public Works Departnient standards prior to fInal plat approval. The applicant shall improve the north Y:z plus 10 feet of 14th Street with curb, gutter, and a 6-foot wide sidewalk. "P" Street shall be improved to a total 24-foot travel width with vegetated drainage swales and a 4-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the west side. . Findings: L Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) sets forth local requirements for the approval of subdivisions. RCW 58.17. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment ofa subdivision. It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and 2. H - 39 --------=-==-- - ---- === -- recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written findings that these provisions are made. Section 16.08.050(B)(1) PAMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written recommendations of the City Departments, and shall either approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City Planning Department. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting. The Port Angeles Public Works, Light, Parks, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed Subdivision. Their comments have been incorporated in the Department's recommendation. Preliminary approval is based upon a drawing dated received January 27,2006, prepared for Kenneth Hopfby 4 Seasons Engineering. The subject property is identified as Low Density Residential on the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan land use map. The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A,2, Goal B, Policy B.I, B.2, B.3, and BA, Goal C; Transportation Element Goal A, Policy A.3, A.6, and B.11; Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goal A, B, Policy B.1, B.3, BA, B.5, B.6, B.7, C.2, C.3, CA, and C.S. 8. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer service and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A,9). 9. The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Policy B.3) states that development should be designed to further the grid system pattern. Preliminary approval will be based upon the dedication of right-of-way to ensure compliance with the policy. 10. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Residential Single Fainily RS-11, which allows a density of up to 3.96 dwelling units per acre. The proposed drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 11,000 square feet in size. Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 6 . 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. . 11. The site will be served by 14th Street, which is neither an arterial, a designated school walking route, or a designated bicycle route. 12. The marine bluff along the north side of the site is considered an environmentally sensitive area. The appropriate buffer area from the bluff is indicated on the plan. The site is generally level with only a slight slope from south to north. The site is not considered a frequently flooded area as it is not listed on the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) maps which denote those areas that are in 100-year flood areas. . "H - 40 . . . Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision March 8, 2006 n_~_ ~ r "15G I 13. The closest transit service is available along "N" Street east ofthe site. "N" street at the intersection of 1 oth is the nearest school walking route. The Port Angeles School District evaluates school bus routes and school walking routes on an annual basis. 14. The Port Angeles School District has been notified of the development to allow them to plan for needed public school facilities and routes. School busses travel on "N" Street. 15. Building permits are required for all structures on the platted lots. All local building and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinlder systems. 16. All utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the area. 17. The City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments will service the site. 18. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of N onsignificance (DNS # 1145) on March 2, 2006, therefore satisfying the City's responsibility under the Act. 19. Improvements to the internal roadway and "P" Street will be required such that the final roadway is an improved width of24 feet with a vegetated drainage swale and a 4' concrete sidewalk established on one side per the City's suburban low impact development standards. Improvements to 14th Street will require 27 feet of paved travel surface with curb, gutter, and a 6-foot concrete sidewalk on the north side. 20. The Port of Port Angeles operation of the Fairchild International Airport is located in the area south ofthe site. The Port staffhas been notified of the proposed subdivision proposal and it is expected that those who purchase properties in the final subdivision will be aware of the existing on-going airport operation. 21. The City's low impact development standards in suburban areas adopted earlier in 2003 were adopted with the understanding that s?-bdivisions developed under the standards would not allow for on-street parking. Site development and design for residential lots developed under the lower impact standards need to accommodate resident parking and visitor parking on-site. Roadside drainage swales developed under low impact development standards should be kept free of debris by adjacent property owners. 22. The Planning Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval. Reports are advisory only to ensure conformance of the proposed subdivision to the general purposes of the City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and specifications adopted by the City. Conclusions: A. As conditioned, the proposed Subdivision is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. H - 41 ~ :::"- --~ . -- ---_.----:.:;:-...:..~-"'--"""'=-...:.:.:=~.:.==..--;;;;... Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision March 8, 2006 Pagt:: 8 A. As conditioned, the proposed Subdivision is consistent with the.Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 P AMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other _....hl~..... 'f"''''''''rt'"'l +"'",.,..,,.,';f nt-I""\"'-"(" ~I""\+f"lhla. ,,,,,,,+.0,." ,.,'1............1.;0("'1 t"I,,~~+'"'.,.."(r "'''I',,,,.,-h:::u., ....."....1".... ,.".,.,;1 _r.to....._~,."..~__ PUUi.1\.1 vyu...Y~, LiUJ..1LlU. LlLV!-'Ll, f-1VLUUH.... yvu....\.IJ.. L:Ju'ppJ.J..\.Ia.l, ~u...t...LU.l.UJ YVUloJl.\o.I..:J, 1-'UlL'\..O UJ.LU. Lvv.lvU...1Vi.1, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walle to and from school. D. Signage educating residents and visitors to the prohibition of on-street parking should be included in the conditions for subdivision approval in those areas developed under the City's low impact development standards in order to prevent public safety issues that could result if on-street parking clogged streets that are allowed to be reduced in size. E. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting ofthis subdivision as articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the Growth Management Act. B. C. H - 42 . . . . . . Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ATTACHMENT B The Comprehensive Plan establishes the long range goals and policies of the City. It is the basis upon which City officials areto make land use decisions. Any project proposed in the City must be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The following goals and policies appear to be the most relevant to the proposal: Designation The Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map identifies the site as Low Density Residential (LDR). Low Density Residential allows an overall residential density of a project to range up to 9 units per net acre and is intended to be for the development of single-family homes. The site development proposal results in a development of 9 units per net acre. The following goals, policies and objectives have been identified as being the most relevant to the proposed subdivision: IV. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Goal A: To manage growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial to the community as a whole, is sensitive to the rights and needs of mdividuals and is consistent with the State of Washington's Growth Management Act. V. LAND USE ELEMENT Goal A: To guide current and future development within the City in a manner that provides certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the challenges and . opportunities of the future. Policy A.2: All land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council and/or any of its appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and its land use map. Goal B: To have a community where residential development and use of the land are done in a manner that is compatible with the environment, the characteristics ofthe use and the users, and the desired urban design of the City. Policy B.t: Urban services shall be available for all residential areas as required by the Capital Facilities Element concurrency policy. Policy B.2: Single-family lots should be of reasonable shape and should have access provided by an alley or by alocal access street or a collector arterial. Policy B.3: All residential developments should be designed with the provisions of fire protection and service vehicle access as key factors in the street design and circulation pattern. For efficient circulation, rights-of-way should be obtained and improvements made to further the grid streetpattemofthe City. Cul-de-sacs may be permitted when designed as an integral part of the major grid street pattern of the City. Policy B.4: All residential developments should be encouraged to preserve and capitalize on existing unusual, unique, and interesting natural features, should preserve and utilize natural vegetation, Should utilize and preserve scenic views, should maximize southern exposures, should offer protection from prevailing winds, and should be designed to nnnllTIlZe energy use. H - 43 Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 10 Goal C: To have a community of viable districts and neighborhoods with a variety of residential opportunities for personal interaction, fulfillment and enjoyment, attractive to people of all ages, characteristics and interests. . VI. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Goal A: To develop a coordinated, multi-modal transportation system which serves all areas of the city and all types of users in a safe, economical, and efficient manner. Policy A,3: The collector arterial streets and local Rccess streets shQuld serve primarily local traffic with special emphasis on safety for pedestrian traffic. Policy A.6: Planning for transportation services and facilities (including public streets, bikeways, pedestrian walkways, and public and private air, marine and land transit services and facilities) shall be performed consistent with the goals and policies of the Capital Facilities Element. Policy B.1l: New arterial streets, local access streets, and alleys should be designed and constructed to conform to the Statewide National Functional Classification System for Federal Aid Systems, WSDOT, and Transportation Improvement Board minimum design standards and standards as adopted by the City. VII. UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT Policy C.2: All new utility services should be underground. X. CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Goal A: To provide and maintain safe and financially feasible urban services and capital facilities . at or above stated levels of service to all City residents and the general public. Goal B: To provide urban streets and utilities at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the general public. Policy B.l: All arterial streets shall function at an average daily level of service ofD or better. Policy B.3: The City shall not approve any development that is not served with water service at or greater than the following level of service standards at the time of development: Single family units: 2 gallons per minute @ 30 psi (fire - 1,000 gallons per minute @ 20 psi). Policy B.4: The City shall not approve any development that is not served with sewer service at or greater than a level of service standard of 300 gallons per day per person at the time of development. Policy B.5: The City shall not approve any development that is not served with electrical service at or greater than a level of service standard of 120/220 volts per service at the time of development. Policy B.6: The City should not approve any development that increases a site's post- development stormwater run-off beyond that allowed by the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin as adopted by the City. Policy B. 7: The City should not approve any development that cannot be served with telecommunications service at or greater than the following level of service standards at the . time of development: telephone, residential: 1 service per unit / cable television, residential: 1 service per unit. Goal C: To provide urban services at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the general public. H - 44 Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 11 . Policy C.!: The Port Angeles School District should develop a capital facilities plan, which the City will consider for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan. The capital facilities plan should contain at h~ast a six-year plan for public financing of such facilities as may be necessary to provide adequate public schools at or greater than the following level of service standards in order to meet anticipated increases in student enrollment, which may be anticipated based on the School District's projected enrollment figures and residential growth as provided for in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan: High School: 125 square feet of permanent, appropriate educational space per student, Middle School: 104 square feet of permanent, appropriate educational space per student, and Elementary School: 100 square feet of permanent, appropriate educational space per student. If capacity is inadequate to house students at the established level of service standards (LOS) and adequate school funding is not available, then the demand for new facilities will be reduced (e.g. through year round use of schools or by matching grade band enrollment to facility capacities) or the level of service standards will be reduced to keep both schools and housing development affordable to the majority of Port Angeles School District residents. Imposition of Growth Management Act impact fees on or denial of new development will not be used as a measure to prevent further degradation of school services, unless the reduced level of service standards are deemed unacceptable to Port Angeles School District No. 121, Clallam County, and the City of Port Angeles. Policy C.2: The City should npt approve any development that will not be served with adequate transit service as deterinined in the comprehensive service and facilities plan for transportation within six years from the time of development. ( Policy C.3: The City should not approve any development that will not be served at or greater than a city-wide level of service standard of9 acres of parks per 1,000 population within six years from the time of development. Policy C.4: The City should not approve any development that will not be served at or less than the following level of service standards at the time of development: Police: 677 persons per one officer. Fire: 4-minute response time or residential sprinkler system installation. . Policy C.5: The City should not approve any development that will notbe served with solid waste collection service at or less than a city-wide level of service standard of 400 pick up accounts per 1000 population within six years from the time of development. Policy C.7: The City should consider the cumulative effect of development on the City's need for adequate public service buildings. . Zoning The Zoning Map identifies the site as Residential Single Family (RS-ll). The purpose and intent of this zone is as follows: "This is a low density residential zone intended to create and preserve sub-urban sized single family residential neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family homes on larger than standard sized Townsite-sized lots, while maintaining densities at or more than 4 dwelling units per acre. Uses that are compatible with and functionally related to a single-family residential environment may be located in this zone. Because of land use impacts associated with nonresidential uses, few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and then only conditionally. This zone H - 45 . -=-====---~=--=-----===--=........ -===--==--=--===----~-- Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 12 provides for a variety in the urban land use pattern fot the City's single family residential neighborhoods, following a curvilinear street system of non.;.through public and private streets with irregularly shaped lots, minimum 7 5-foot front lot lines, and 60-foot rights-of-way for collector arterial streets in large rectangular blocks and usually located in outlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable land. " The minimum lot area is 11,000 square feet. All lots shall comply with the minimum area and r1~'t'\"1Q,'t"\["I;^""'131 't"'Ar111;1'"t:.,..,....An+C' t:)C' -fnl1f"\uTC'. uJ.........J."".....Lu....v~.........J. J.""~....................................."u o..&.u J.""............~. OJ. . Front: Rear: 25 feet 25 feet, except 1 0 feet for detached accessory buildings in the rear one-third of the lot. 8 feet, except 3 feet for detached accessory buildings in the rear one- third of the lot. 30 feet 30% Interior Side: Maximum Height: Lot Coverage: SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE (No. 1631 as amended): The City's Subdivision Ordinance (No. 1631), codified as Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code, has been reviewed with respect to the proposal. Although the entire ordinance has not been cited, the following development standards and policies have been found to be applicable: 16.08.060 - Standards and Policies. A. GENERAL STANDARDS. If a proposed street and/or lot pattern for any zone in Port Angeles has been made by the Councilor the Commission, the street layout of any new plat submitted shall be in general conformance to said pattern or plan. Otherwise proposed streets in new subdivisions shall conform to the Comprehensive Plan and Urban Services Ordinance as adopted. No plan for the platting, replatting, subdivision, or dedication of any area shall be recommended for approval by the Commission unless streets shown therein are connected by surfaced road to an existing improved public right-of-way adequate to serve the existing and new lots. Where the Comprehensive Plan or the City's official street plan indicates the necessity of a new. right-of-way of a required width or portion thereof for street purposes, whether within a new plat or new subdivision, or along the boundaries of a new plat, new subdivision or new lot, such required right-of-way or portion thereof shall be dedicated to the City of Port Angeles by the filing of a plat. The Planning Commission may require plats to provide areas for parks, playgrounds, open spaces, recreation facilities, schools, school grounds, safe walking conditions on school routes, transit stops, and drainage ways. Each proposed subdivision and the ultimate use of the land therein shall be in the interests of public health, safety and welfare, and subdividers shall be prepared to present evidence to this effect when requested by the Commission. Restrictive covenants not contrary to existing regulations regarding the use of land, governing and binding all future owners oflots or tracts, may be shown on any plat. No Final plat ofland within the force and effect of existing Zoning Regulations shall be approved unless it is conforming with such Regulations. Whenever there is a discrepancy between minimum standards or dimensions noted herein and those contained in Zoning Regulations, Building Codes, or other official Regulations, the highest standard shall apply.s . . H - 46 . . . Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 13 B. GENERAL PRINCIPLES, POLICIES. The Commission shall ensure that appropriate provision is made for: (1) the harmonious development of neighborhoods by requiring coordination of streets within subdivisions. with existing or planned streets, or with other elements of the Comprehensive Plan; (2) adequate open spaces forrecreation, schools, light and air; (3) distribution of population and traffic which will create conditions favorable to public health, safety and convenience. C. STREETS. 1. The arrangement, character, extent, width, grade and location of all streets shall conform with the Comprehensive Plan, the Capital Facilities Plan, the Urban Services Ordinance, and the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines, and shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned roads, to topographic conditions, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed uses of the land to be served by such roads. 2. Where such is not shown on the Comprehensive Plan, the arrangement of streets in a subdivision shall either provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing streets in the surrounding area; or shall conform to a street plan for the neighborhood, approved by the City, to meet a particular situation where topographic or other conditions make continuance or conformance to existing streets impracticable. This shall also apply to cluster subdivisions, 3. If a street plan for an area has been made by the City, the street layout of a proposed subdivision in such an area shall be in general conformance to the plan. 4. When a portion of a subdivider's tract is to be subdivided, a street plan for the entire tract shall be submitted to indicate how the street pattern of the plat submitted will coordinate with the entire tract when fully platted and with streets in the surrounding area. 5. Where a tract is subdivided into lots or tracts larger in area than twice the minimum lot size, the City may require an arrangement oflots and streets such as topermit a later re-subdivision in conformity with the street and lot requirements specified in these Regulations. 6. Where a proposed subdivision abuts or contains an existing or proposed arterial street of is adjacent to an existing or planned business, commercial or industrial district, the City may require' treatment as may be necessary (1) for the adequate protection of residential properties; and (2) to afford separation of through and local traffic. 7. Where a subdivision borders or contains a railroad or limited access highway right- of-way, the City may require a road approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way at a distance suitable for appropriate use of the intervening land. Such distances, shall also be determined with due regard for the requirements of approach grades and future grade separations. 8. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles. Acute angle intersection shall be avoided. 9. There shall be no reserve strips controlling access to roads, except where the control of such strips is definitely placed with the City under conditions approved by the Commission. ' 10. Sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school shall be provided pursuant to RCW 58.17.060 and 58.17.110. E. ,LOTS. 1. The lot area, width, depth, shape and orientation, and the minimum building setback lines shall be appropriate for the location of the subdivision, for the type of development and land use contemplated, and for the type of street systems plarmed for the area, and shall conform with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. H 47 Juan de Fuca Bluffs Subdivision March 8, 2006 Page 14 2. Excessive depth in relation to width shall be avoided. No lot shall have a depth greater than three times its width. 3. Comer lots for residential use shall have extra width to permit appropriate building setback from and orientation to both streets. 4. To ensure public health, convenience and safety, the subdividing ofland shall provide, by means of a public street, each lot with direct access to an existing public street that is improved to City street standards. 5. Double frontage and reverse frontage lots shall be avoided, except where essential to provide separation of residential development from arterial streets or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. A planting screen easement across which there shan be no right of access shall be provided along the line of lots abutting such a principal arterial street or disadvantageous use. 6. Side lot lines shall be substantially at right angles or radial to street lines and front lot lines. 7. No lot or lots for residential purposes shall be divided or sold into additional lots or building sites, without compliance with Title 16 PAMC. S. SIGNAGE One (1) free standing sign no larger than twenty-four (24) square feet in area shall be permitted for identification of the subdivision. H - 48 . . . - , r I SUBDIVISION ..UPLICATION CIl'Y OJ:i POKT Al-;JGp.'.T ..tiS APPLICATION Al'l'LlCANT INFORMATION: APPUCANT: ILpnn-PTh Ilc'S..;f \ ADDRESS: ~{')P, ~J,rrnh::::\-' ,A\(p. \2f:\ \,nJlL-::lnl J ~(\{ ~ 9 e:,22.S APPllCANT'S REPRESENTATnTE: S"'li---no> n<S r~Jt~ ITY OF PORT ANGELES D p~f. Qommunily Development PH. #: In(-,'? 'J,S' 4r):;;'9 PH.#: .ADDRESS: PROPERTY oWNER (If other than applicant) 4trnf' Ct'S CI ~~t", ,..ADDRESS:. /1 f..../ R~ l. ~ PROPERTY INFORMATION: ./..WL-n'~ -d"'''''- '.1--1'--1) c. S. <<, l, -,' C-, . / 'L'tS -;:, ~. \1--1 '\"'- \.J~. Property address:- Generallocauon: \t. .. Legal description.: Property zonmg: , 'e.. ~ ~ .I~ '\.. .Q. .r D {:::;--It .( ~vJ 'WI '&6 f M ~glf51 (00 Existing site areas: Proposed site areas: A",eage iD: Streei, ~ .") I>- Pm:ks p. Other non-residentiai l2nd us," Melhod of providing: pomble Water: D\ 'j .' . _ sewe:r:[i T j Streets serving site: f,\ It\P>.'.... S1\-pp 1 'i,' ~.q t\,. st-t"'C" "\ o.D'j/ ? \.u?v~~ /, /Ph A) /6../10 ~c- 1 (WE) ~REBY CERTIFY that I (we) JIIll (are) the applicant(s) of the above-desc:nbed property and request that the proposed subdivision' be app~ov~d. Ris understood that wilful misrepresentation will terminate the applic:atlon. ..,. I (WE) HEREBY CERTIFY that I (we) am (are) the owner(s) of the above-described property and request that the proposed subdivision be approved. It is understood that wilful misrepresentation of the information will ~;~; lltion. ilig<rl f~ !'j . Signed: . " Date: iAJ/ DC. =~~-- =-'--I.~~~-, ~ . Signed JJ~J Signed: H ,PateJ- JVf(/ ~ / - 0 c. ---- .~----- --- ~. II: 11"..., '::.-.",,'1-.-" I .{ -- . ,;.-c'l ';',. MOST / COMBINED / I / I !UNsrAelE _ / / STORM SE\'F-R', / I APPROX1~AiE ~~~;~. O. r 71 OtJTFA,'+ , I I /TDP OF I I ' . /1 I I . BLUFFU.iE. . /. .' I I . . i" I ~ . I I'? / I .... . /_1-..--'--- I -~--r-- ,-'-j-'-:;>// I' .../ .-.' ~ r I ---r--'" ..' ~._ ,,If \ $C(, J3\Jff~ I -."'..' i i I _ I ___ I - // I I '..:.- ---. ~ I . ,-- '-_'1 _ 1.----- .-.,1,-.... 1I1 llr "', ;.? / I ~/ r "',lr If;;\ ,r ---, .. . " .i"' / >'- I j I 6--'! i I 0 : I ~ @) ~ i I 0 1,1 @) II ~ \-. - . .,. / / ''':-:'7'~''':-' \ , . / I," I)' kGj~, s.:'1' ~ ! !".,6 so.n:j I\".., =rt. I :22091 SIlrT~ I (200' sr'm! ~ I Q!) . .' I ,Q> (/ ~ _ . _ _I. I '.' ! I I'll III 11 ! I{ ~'20251J.FT. I' r{ f \ I .! 1\ ,1,__ : .1 I II 111 III I i I ;' II "It' . '__.__ _____ . /:' 15' III! - _, .J! L - - J L -.. .J L. -- - .J . L . I' / I 0(.. .... Y, ..e-- ".,,- SN'- / l I..:::..J . .- I 77 L 77 ~7 I 77~.! I " .\' ./._""'s"'~- ~>r-=.'1T~ .'./.... 21;U7SO.Fr. 111'-< g" .-L..--.:..::Si:-'-- ---L." I ,/ S'AN'1H~S";~7---'- - -- -, - / ....... ,t~ 11"'- ,........->. !>" ---+. ...~-. ... 1"' l/~ <,~/ 1/'J,. ~ ...........;.z I / ./"00..:;:-:.,.... .' ;,. ~~",-\I y" I ~'_', \l'-_."~" ". '. Ii'." I I,COM61/iED , ...... / '::-- ", ' V ~"""-"A"'-S."_SAiJ...,...g >u"-"4...o.€("~~_ './ I /..: /: SANITARY I . :-'- ...------ ,: /..l,:~ "~,~'::!,/}~i.~~;-~-!~:.-}~ .-- > '. /:::~'-::~~~?:///i:",/./ ~~~lFT I ,.,,_,.'. . "';.'.:' ...., . / /~ ,>,0 nOli ..so.'/.'/'1f. /,:~. -- ~4 - - ,;1 [ - - - I. ..--, "-..:..:..~<..':' :$r;~';f / - / '..... I . I " ",<.t..,.:\ I/f// /'::- "" 11; ,,,,,,,@0"".Fr./ ..':.. ....-"!~-.y. -.-:... <;,:" I ..... I Z.,. '"."..::t ;'/"/ ,~-'l-::::- ..1::JJ7SOfT{/,/ 13 ,/ '_ ''', ):"-......" '$"",/H ..... '" '.' < 0 ....... / ../J., / Ji,' , ......?~., .. 7 I ' 1 ..- lI." SQ.fT. . )-;,/ . . , / '.,~..... i' /. . ~...' ~1l' ~ " .. 11?\.l" 'I . :":--", nOllsa;r.)- /;<<"'/ /,.. '-, .' ..JtJ'l 0'1'.... { 0; i If' / ,. / ,/ "::::~;:.... .-'..0/.~.,~/,/.,,:( '. @ "~.,::. Ifl /1 "'~::"'" ,..~~. 'i,/I I ., '...... ...J J'. lis l I foJ .,..... ". ,] '/.' 77...:>" Ol" / I' i f2\ . <.....'- . .' /J _tF./ I '\ /' ...~ ~ .d'~12S38 sa.n:.' -{ '... .j/~' .~ / $: 'r' o:!\ / ...... I ....:.,... ~ ~ (" 'Y. ~~ YJ SAN MH "::--- '... .' J 111.... SO.n: ~ 't ~ :'::~ _ /'" ..... ...... n," stifT.,7 // ,/ / A....... ( ~ "":':..:" "'.'j' ,.:...../ " 1'J4'..' :,..~ . I / r.-\":;';'" 1'.{;".//4// ":..:-. 2 --::",./.., '-~ '. 0/ I / 24'AC. "-: -~..::-( ,( V ':-:.~. //~//'/".,/ "':::-~<S'J? 2S7S:son:/ 11'.,' ........::-...' ",'~I t' ~ PAWIG W/ .' . ,_I,'::::, ". ) "'.' 1//,' '~''''.'- I,.i^.t 12A-OUOFT....,.. / (b JoI( DIn;HEA. '. '::", T." nOli 1i'J.n.J .,4 " / .......... f2l\ .::-:. '" .' Ii'I ,. ..,:' f/5) " ......../ 1.( / SIDE, T)1>. ...... ", "-:;-"'.1'-" .(\./ :11//1 ...., ~ '..'''' If/, ",'-"6'"\.::-;.' '>V I '>--.. ". "C;,;<.;.. './"): .'/ #./.1 . .,.~....:: "<tillil so.n; .');.; / " '. ,~ . , ''\'' / ~ 0 ,,- I . . '.',' I.of".' /~q, ..@)'.,..d.j,Y....-IUI.-SOFT.:---/J. ..... . .~" IJ/.' ....v/ 20 ',,-:-- ' I'" "1'12\ ..,., -l' I / ..... , '"~"" " ..;L-", ,/./ ... __ 0" .::;,.~ c'",' ~ .' ........./ ~ / / " <, "'-:-or,_q*~ l:"" .~,~:!..sp.n;.::..- _-- ,,::>~.~ ~.~'". / t) I ~ I ..... ':::::J J.. . ~. . _ ---: ~.~ J>. ._J rU2I soa. . ..::- ". 'II / '......~ ''''~~-'''' ',... @..<....... .... / ....... '.. "'" nOJP st;J@;FT~ .;....... -~ ,: I ~ ." . ....... ".J';"'~,..19 "-";",",,~'J,p~ ..: I ~ ..."=>'/ I"' ..... .,:j>.. . '''"';''''''. ,,,"I oj;. / ........ 7 ..0'...... .... ..... ;;"/.,/ .........>..:..~./" /' ;/J/"J,. , 0( 'It';... "i I~ S<lH. . ..]'...J 'Ii' // ;' .........._'" '4 &oJ.. '-..;~..... /... @ ..... / ./#1~J.I!'i ...... (,,- .....:l7f5'. ....~ "'::'.' ~ ./ / ~.. ......... ...../ ~1 /1 ../i" I "", ....., '-.......J J~~/~:';/ {! <.. -. -- ~ ~--- .l'-. l .'. , ,. .' .. -.-" , .::. .~ 01 o SCALE: 1.~IOD' '. ~ :"':.~..J 'f;' ~oo . 200 SC..QE r-I r!:D" ..... ') ..... '-:~-" ". .... ' ..... CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION PLAN /......::..~.... '. ". " , .....".... ........ '~'" ~"" ......." ..... ..... ", '. ..... _. . ..... ' .- -. -Ii -:-~":.' E Y;,. ~~:.):~~}:,:;;:.::~.;!~~:;;~: . ..' / I / / / . . ACCESS OPTIONS: 1. ~7A 10TH STREET AND IYAllim PLAT 2. 14m STREET 1M BUTLER STREET 3. 14TH STREET ~?A MILII'AUKIT DRiVE: 4. 14TH STREET \ITA MCDONALD SmEET SANITARY SEIlER OPTIONS: 1. PUMP TV MILWAUKEE UP 14TH StREET R.O.IV. 2. COMBINED PUMP STATION IIITH WALKET/ PLAT IfJI fER OpnONS: I. B" mOM MCDONALD STREfT. LOOP THROUGH PROJECT 2. 8" FROM AIIL WAUKEE OR/I'E THROUGH TO WALKE/? PLA T SlORI./ SElleR OPTIONS: I, COMBINED OU1TALL \llTH WALKER PlAT 2.;! LOTS MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS - 70TH ST. &' 14TH ST. MINIMUM STREET SE:CTJON FOR LOW IMPACT srANDARD /S 24 n. PAVING II/" DITCHES AND PATHS 14m ST. UAr RE:QUlRE CURB & GUTTER . . . FORTANGELES WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO DATE: APRIL 4, 2006 To: CITY COUNCIL FROM: YVONNE ZIOMKOWSKI, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: 2005 YEAR-END REpORT It is with great pleasure that I present the budget status report for the General Fund and utilities for the year ended December 31,2005. This report provides the results of City operations as compared with the amended budget and prior year actuals. The reports are divided by fund and show revenue by source, and expenditures by object. I am very happy to report that all the Department Heads kept a tight rein on their budgets and most came in under budget. General Fund Summary As of December 31, 2005, General Fund revenues amounted to $15,518,239; expenditUres totaled $15,526,672. This year, we included over $1.5 million in support of Capital Improvement Programs and $270,000 to support street operations. The actual overall financial operations resulted in maintaining the reserves level from 2004 of over $3.9 million. As compared witl1th~ amended budget, we realized a little over $880,000 savings. Table. I shows a summary of revenues, expenditures, and fund balance for the General Fund. General Fund Reserves 2005 Variances 2004 2005 Amended Actual vs. Actual Actual Budget Budget Beginning Fund Balance 4,163,986 3,917,941 3,917,941 Add: Re..enues 14,200,143 15,518,239 14,977,241 540,998 Less: Operating Expenditures 13,204,603 13,614,055 13,987,222 (373,167) Operating TransferS to Other Funds 91,585 142,617 102,617 40,000 I Transfers for CIP & Streets 1,150,000 1,770,000 1,770,000 . Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance (246,045) (8,433) (882,598) 874,165 I Ending Fund Balance 3,917,941 3,909,508 3,035,342 874,165 H-51 During the 2005 amended budget process, Council designated $1.5 million of fund balance for . future or emergency capital improvement projects. As a result of 2005 operations, we are able to designate an additional $800,000 to $1 million to this pool. Council will decide the amount and method of allocating these reserves. We are in the process of reviewing the Capital Facility Plan (CFP) and will present recommendations to the Council in the near future. Revenues General Fund revenues by major revenue source are presented in the following table. 2005 Variances Amended Positive (Negative) Actual Budget $ % Taxes 9,427,421 9,145,102 282,319 ' 3.09 Licenses & Permits 574,683 407,495 167,188 41.03 Intergovernmental Revenue 481,622 478,197 3,425 0.72 Charges for Services 4,256,147 4,174,571 81,576 1.95 Fines & Forfeitures 243,013 290,075 -47,062 -16.22 Miscellaneous Revenues 340,353 286,801 53,552 18.67 Transfers -in 195,000 195,000 0 0.00 Total Revenues 15,518,239 14,977,241 540,998 3.61 III C ~ :E 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o ~ 0-i-1?? ~\.'" ~-v.e'" \.0e<:' '~-v.f..e<:' ~ef.. \~ oef.. eNe c...e~ Jte'" ~'" 'b. 't ~ ~'o~ 7;) ~o" ,.{f..-a: e'" o~. 1:>' 'b. ef..1 ' \..,\&~"::> \~\.ef..($ 0",0-f..c':J>e ~\~0<:' ~\",o.O~ General Fund Revenue Overall, actual revenues exceeded the amended budget by $540,998, or 3.6%. In comparison to 2004, revenue increased by 8.5% or $1,080,484. The majority of the increase was in the tax and permits catego- ries. Tax revenues, which comprise over 60% of the General Fund budget and in- clude property, sales and use, utility, tele- phone, leasehold, and gambling taxes, came in at 3%, or $282,319 over the budget and 3% or $294,584 over 2004 levels. This in- crease is attributed to $106,346 in sales tax from the graving dock and an almost . 1II1II2004 Actual II1II2005 Actual I General Fund Revenue Sources $15,518,239 $75,000 increase in sales tax received from retail activities. Additionally, gambling taxes came in above expectation and well above last year. Charges for SeNces 8% Sales Tax 19% Utility Tax 17% . H-52 . The collection of property taxes, the largest single source of revenue, was slightly below the levy as a result of uncollectible accounts. In comparison to the prior year, this revenue increased by $86,571 or 2.5% as a result of new construction. In 2005, the City was still responsible for the payment of$60,000 to Nippon Paper Industry as a court settlement. The assessed valuation, including new construction, increased by only 7.9%, which resulted in a decrease in the City's tax rate, from $3.14 to $3.05 per $1,000 of assessed valuation (AV). Sales tax, which used to be the largest revenue source, is always watched very closely. Since sales tax is very sensitive to economic conditions and consumer confidence, it is sometimes difficult to predict. Sales tax continues to gain ground slightly each month. Remember, there is a two-month lag from collection to remittance by the State. The sales tax chart illustrates that collection has been better than both the forecast and prior years. The higher than estimated receipts were mostly related to the graving yard proj ect ($106,346) and an increase in retail sales ($74,929). Receipts in January through April (November 2004- February 2005 sales), and in August (June sales) were above expectations (the best in 16 years!). Components of Sales Tax 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Construction. 163,934 196,519 260,590 268,414 508,699 434,242 Wholesale 235,942 239,826 176,276 219,257 238,541 222,272 Automotive 398,264 375,649 380,765 399,570 408,744 445,642 Retail 690,938 747,153 744,475 805,322 846,678 921,607 . Hotels/Motels 92,480 91,890 97,967 94,817 80,224 83,493 Communication 81,933 88,770 81,396 85,409 86,586 102,559 Other 645,231 538,549 572,667 635,986 685,963 719,291 * In 2004, $222,104 was received from the Graving Dock, and in 2005, $106,346 1,000,000 y 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500.000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 2000 - Construction . - Hotels/fIIIotels .. 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 - Wholesale -Automotive -Retail -Communication -Other H-53 This time, not construction (except the Graving Yard) but activities in the retail and automotive . categories contributed heavily to this increase. This trend continues in 2006. The sales tax receipts in the first quarter are at the same level as 2005, but when adjusted for the graving dock we see the uphill trend. Residential construction activities are still strong. Wholesale and retail sales are also slightly higher than last year at the same time. Automotive is at the same level as 2005. Utility taxes, which include electric, water, wastewater, solid waste (both collection and landfill), and stormwater, were the most positively growing resource in the General Fund as a result of the increasing rate structure in our municipal utilities. However, in 2005 this revenue was 1.1 % or $29,114 below 2004 levels and $16,944 below the budget. As a result of a mild November and December, as well as conservation efforts, electric utility tax was more than $60,000 below both the budget and previous year. Other utilities realized small growth as compared to last year. The results were a little surprising, as during the budget process, we usually take a conservative approach to the weather, which has a big effect on electric and water consumption. Overall, electric services provide almost 64% of all utility tax revenue and any changes in the consumption or in the power purchase market influence. this revenue. The Electric Utility is taxed at 6%, which is the maximum allowable without voter approval. All other utilities pay 8% tax. During the budget review in August! September of 2005, there was higher than expected collection of telephone taxes, which are levied at 5.5% of gross receipts. In past years, this revenue source grew rapidly due to the increasing popularity of cellular phones. our collection is at 4% or $21,769 above the 2004 level. 1,800 1,600 .a 1 ,400 ; 1,200 III is 1,000 ~ .... 800 600 400 200 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 -Electric -SW-ColI. -Water -Wastewater -5W - LF -Stormwater The data for SW-LF begins in 2004, as this is the year the SW fund was separated into Collections and Landfill. . !TelePhOne Taxi 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 o 100 300 400 500 600 200 Thousands At year-end, this trend stabilized and . H-54 . . . After several years of stagnant, and even a decline in growth in 2003, gambling ~axes, realized the highest growth in 2005. These taxes came in at more than $31,000 above projection, and 95% or $154,097 more than 2004. This growth is even more striking when compared to 2003, over 300% or $237,305! Most of this increase is attributed to a new cardroom establishment. Licenses and Permits are 40% or almost $155,000 above last year and 33% above expectations. As compared to 2002, the increase is over 85% or,$250,000! This three year trend was also seen in the sales tax receipts from construction activities., Intergovernmental revenues, which are mostly state shared revenues, grants, and local agency participation in our programs, were 24% above 20Q4 ($117,804). Our goal is to continue to aggressively seek new grants and partnerships with other-agencies. Other budgeted intergovernmental revenue, such as liquor board profits and liquor excisetax are $3,000 belo~ State projections. Overall, we received $207,600 or $11.13 per capita versus $11.16 last year. The Charges for Services category inyreased by 15.2% or $647,845 as co:II1,pared to 2004, and collections were 1.9% or $81 ,576 over the budget. One reason is the pool ($11,000). These changes also include internal cost allocations to utilities, which increased due to inflation. Miscellaneous revenues include interest aq.d penalty on delinquent bills, City Pier moorage, Ediz Hook and other leases, donations, reimbursements for court time, and other one-time revenues. Interest revenue was $66,933 higher as the result of an upturn in the market last year. Overall, the Federal Reserve Board in- creased interest rates 14 times from June 2004! On the $50 mil- lion investment port- foliO, any iricrease in rates .translates to real money. For example 25 basis points (0.25%) can return $125,000 annually, which is 2-3 full time equivalent positions! Interest Yield Curve 6 5 4 E B 3 .. Gl Q. 2 1 o 12/31/2001 12/31/2002 12/31/2003 12/312004 12/31/2005 - 3 month I - 6 months . --.2 year - 5 year -10 year - 30 year Fines and Forfeitures at $243,013 are below budget and last year's actual by 12.5% and 23.5%, respectively. H-55 Expenditures . General Fund operating expenditures were $13,756,672 and were supported by $1,770,000 in transfers to the Capital Improvement and Street Funds for a total expenditure 'of $15,526,672. Operating expenditures included a $35,000 transfer to the Economic DevelopmentFund, a $31 ,000 transfer in support of Recreational Activities, and $20,000 to support the Fine Arts Center. Overall, total expenditures were 2.1% or $333,169 below budget, but 7.5%($1,080,484) more than in 2004. Most of the savings occurred in jail costs ($105,832), charges for services 1($ 146,49 1), and personnel ($164,512). Personnel costs, including wages and benefits, represent more than 70% of the operating budget and were 1.6% or $164;512 below estimates. However, this result is a little misleading since a portion of engineering labor was included in capital projects. When we implement "programmatic budgeting" this situation will be resolved. Additional savings in the personnel category were attributed to several short-term vacancies, the postponing of hiring in most departments, controlling overtime spending, and some employees postponing retirement. It appears that we had some control over the coimty jail costs, which include the incarceration program as well as medical care for the prisoners. Over the past three years, this cost, was closely controlled and monitored. It appears that the efforts of the Attorney's Office brought .positive results. In 2002, contributions to the county jail decreased by 19% or $93,821 as compared to 2001 costs. In 2003, the savings were even greater and also resulted in spending coming in at $184,238, or almost 44% under budget. In 2004, the jail cost was $284,120, which is $111,880 below budget. This trend ccmtinued in 2005, where the $224,168 cost was 32% below the budget and 21 % below 2004. Jail Cost . 100,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 In 2005, we were able to des- ignate $1.5 million of addi- tional funds to capital im- provement projects. Again this year, we are very pleased to show the Council positive financial results and recorrimend the designation of these funds to special construction projects based on the Council's priorities. o 2000 2001 2002 20032004 2005 . H-56 . . . Reserves or "unreserved fund balances" provide a measure of the financial resources available for future use, especially during temporary revenue shortfalls or emergencies. How do we determine what is the "right amount" of reserves? There are a few considerations, such as reliability of revenue sources, timing of cash inflows and outflows, and the projected level of capital spending. Generally, fund balance should be maintaine<i at a level that provides an adequate cushion in the event of economic recession or unanticipated revenue shortfalls. Further, it should ensure desired cash flow levels to avoid unnecessary short-term borrowing. On the other hand, keeping excessive fund balances, especially when there is a great need for capital improvements, may reflect poor management and lack of policies. Of course, we should always avoid the use of reserves for on-going operations, unless this is a short- term, temporary problem. Reserves 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 ~ 2,500 .. c :ll 2,000 ::I ~ 1,500 I- 1,000 500 I General Fund Reserves I Our Financial Management policy sets the minimum level of fund balance at 10% of the General Fund budget. In the past six years, we have kept fund balance in the General Fund consistently over the $2 million level. As of December 31, 2005, it was $3,909,508. According to the same policy, the Council may designate additional reserves to fund capital projects or other "one-time" expenditures. Presently, we are committing any budgetary "surplus" to capital needs. However, if the Council decides to designate an additional $1,000,000 from reserves to capital projects, we will still be able to maintain almost $3 million in reserves and be in compliance with our policy. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The Council may decide how to allocate these funds among transportation, parks, technology, or public safety projects. The current fund balance level is adequate in the General Fund, however, it is very important that we continue to walk the conservative road and take proactive steps in future budget planning and not allow hits on the reserves. It is also important to concentrate on public improvements, which attract economic growth. H-57 Outlook for the Future . Every year the Finance Department updates the City's five-year forecast. We assume the task of projecting revenues and expenses, calculate estimates of growth and impact based on explicit assumption and policies, and factor in special circumstances that influence the cost of providing services. Through this strategic exercise, we hope to forecast financial trends which will enable us to plan for necessary adjustments. This proactive approach to'the City's finances is becoming a priority. As the graph and table display, by only maintaining the status quo and not doing any major capital projects, the fund balance in the General Fund would be depleted in year 2011. Of course, by taking this proactive approach, we are very careful not to allow this situation. We stress how important it is to be still more diligent in seeking operating efficiencies, looking for new revenue sources, and increasing our tax base. 7 Year Financial Forecast In Thousands 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Revenue 15,518 ,15,829 16,145 16,468 16,797 17,133 17,476 17.826 18,182 Expenditures 15,527 15,678 16,305 16,957 17,635 18,341 19,074 19.837 20,631 Reserves 3,910 4,060 3,901 3,412 2,574 1,367 -232 -2,244 -4,692 7-Year Financial Forecast . 15,000 5,000 25,000 20,000 o -5,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 III Revenue III Expenditures 0 Reserves I Street Fund Revenues in this fund are derived primarily from property taxes $463,480 (31 %) and gas taxes $396,108 (26%). In addition, 39% or $595,000 of this fund is supported by internal transfers from Solid Waste, Real Estate Excise Tax, and General Fund. Actua12005 operating revenues for Street of$1,512,833, were exactly on target. . H-58 . . . It is important to remember that every year, the reliance of the Street Fund on the General Fund grows. The amount of gas tax per capita increased in the past year, however, the gas tax portion of revenue is shrinking. Expenditures of $1,469,768 were $35,463 or 2% below budget. Most of the savings were in purchases for supplies ap.d personnel spending. A $270,000 transfer from the GeneralFund was in support of operations ($240,000) and capital projects ($30,000). Capital projects are also supported by transfers from the REET 23.00 22.50 22.00 21.50 21.00 20.00 19.50 Street Revenue Sources Other 4% 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 20032004 2005 investment interest - have all been re- stricted or decreased over the last few years. At the same time, maintenance costs to transportation infrastructure and public expectations have been in- creasing. There do not appear to be many local options for revenue expan- sion in this area, although there are. op- tions at the County level for a local op- tional gas tax if voter approved. It is possible that maintenance will con- sume more and more of our operating budget in the future, and we will be forced to do only new capital projects if voter approved as a special levy. 440,000 430,000 420,000 410,000 400,000 390,000 380,000 370,000 360,000 350,000 Transfers from Other Funds 39% funds ($200,000). Street projects will be elaborated on in the next section of this report. We were still able to increase reserves in this fund to a $qOO,OOO level, which helps us with leveraging outside rev- enues, such as grants. The emphasis in this fund has been to maintain existing service levels and to seek outside support. Overall, operating revenues in the.Street Fund have been severely strained as the traditional re- sources - property taxes, fuel taxes, and H-59 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002200320042005 REETs REETs 5-Year Revenue . Other than General Fund, real estate excise taxes (REETs) are the other ma- jor funding sources for the Capital Im- provement Fund.<\nd street projec~. These taxes are levied on all reales- tate sales at the combined rate of one- half of one percent. 600,000 500,000 400,000 .,300,000 . 200,000 In the last two years, collection of these 100,000 taxes exceeded our estimates as a re- sult of a very active real estate market. 2000 2001 2002' 2003 2004 2005 In 2005, we collected $561,998, which is 34% or $142,000 more that budgeted and 12% more than in 2004. However, we would like to stress that this revenue is cyclical and that proceeds from this tax can be used only for street and park projects. So far, these funds are respon- sible for the debt payments on Marine Drive $47,770 and 8th ,Street reconstruction $93,295. In addition, they supported street projects by $200,000. I At the end of 2005, t~ese funds accumulated reserves of over $1.2 million. Again, we have to remember that the Public Works Trust Fund loans in the total amount of $2,527,200 are a 20-year . commitment and in 2005 we increased support to street projects. Capital Improvement Projects The Capital Improvement Program is an integral part of the overall City financi31 program and is reviewed and approved on an annual basis. The 2005 spending on the Capital Improvement Program amounts to almost $10.8 million and is comprised of general purpose, transportation, safety, and utility programs. Since utility capital projects of $4 million are included in utility budgets, this section will concentrate on general governmental projects. In the past five years, we were able to designate almost $5.9 million in funding from the General Fund to CIP projects, including $1.5 'million in 2005. We were also very aggressive in seeking federal and state grants, wHich supplemented funding for the projects. Out of $1.9 million in grants received in 2005, almost $1.2 million was designated for general governmental projects. In 2005, all spending for governmental projects totaled over $6.8 million. Major projects in 2005 included: . 8th Street Bridges replacement $854,547 ($2,139,816 so far) supported by grants ($1,587,502 so far) . Peabody Street reconstruction $454,334 supported by $300,154 in grants (mostly 2004 project) . Gateway Center $28,336 for a cost to date of$340,113, supported by $184,223 in grants . H-60 . . . · Shane Park drainage and field repair $266,500 · Chip seal program $337,085 · WUGA (Western Urban Growth Area) $4,723,725, funded by bonds, utilities, and General Fund · Several smaller street and parks projects. HotellMotel Tax Lodging taxes are the sole source of revenue for this fund (with the exception of very minor revenue from interest). This revenue is derived from the 4% tax on renting a room in a hotel...motel within the city limits. The first 2% is derived by taking 2% of the State's 6.5%salestax and repating it back to the community for local programs to promote tourism. The additional 2%, which was authorized in 1998, is to be used solely for tourism marketing and promotion. Revenue in this fund exceeded $448,000 and was 4.3% or $18,383 less than in 2004 but 17.6% higher than in 2003. We are hopeful that not only beautiful weather, but also marketing efforts contributed to this revenue. This year, once again, the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee designated additional $100,000 for marketing instead of reserving it for capitaIprojects. Just forinformational purposes, in 2003, but effective 2004, a new charge was permitted on lodging. Counties with a population of more than 40,000 (but less than 1 million), and the cities within those counties, may form a "tourist promotion area" (TPA). Within that area, they may assess a charge of up to $2 per night on the sale ()flodging. The revenue must be used for "'tourism promotion," which. includes expenditures designed to increase tourism and convention business (restrooms for touriststpaybe included). Form~tion of an area is initiated by ~ pepti8n t() the legislative body. The petition must iIlcludethe signatures of people in the lodging industry that would be paying at least 60% of the charges in the area. Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50;000 1996 1997 1998 199920002001 2002 200320042005 Several counties and cities have already formed a TPA; they include: Spokane County, Yakima County, Tri Cities, Clark County, and the City of Liberty Lake. H-61 PenCom . The Peninsula Communication Fund (PenCom), established in 1992, accounts for all revenues and expenditures related to the county-wide consolidated dispatch and record service. lu'November 2003, the voters approved a one-tenth of one percent sales and use tax for emergency communication systems and facilities. This tax was implemented on April 1, 2004. In 2005, collection of this tax exceeded $811,000; of this revenue, 25% is designated to capital projects. Another major revenue source ($381,076) is 911 tax. In'2005, we received an additional $272,015 from the enhanced 9-1-1 program. These funds have been designated to support the PenCom System Analyst position. The remaining budget (approximately 46%) is supported by participating agencies. Enterprise Funds represent oyer 60% of the City's budget. A city, unlike the private sector, cannot make a profit. Expenses andrevenues should balance. However, the most significant issue affecting utilities has been to ensure that these funds operate as self supporting and maintain an adequate cash balan(;e to cover operation costs, d~?t service including debt coverage, and capital repairs and replacement. As of December 31, 2005, ,all utilities were self supporting and maintained a safe level of cash reserves. Total cash reserves in utilities were over $22.5 million. Utility Funds Utilities (Enterprise Funds) which include electric, water, wastewater, solid waste (collection and landfill), and stormwater are managed on a different basis than the general governmental funds. The management of these funds does not focus on the line items of revenue and expenses, but rather the "bottom line" of whether expenses are supported by revenues. 1/1 C ~ :::E Enterprise Funds by Utility sw - LandfiQ (1% Storrrmater 1% . Cash Balances - Utilities 12 10 8 6 4 2 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 OJ Electric . Water III SW - Collec. . SW:.. LF . Wastewater . Stormwater . H-62 . . . Capital projects in utilities totaled over $4.5 million and included $901,499 in Electric, $1,162,673 in Water, $846,619 in Wastewater, and $753,709 in Solid Waste Landfill, and $350,153 in Stormwater. Major projects included: . Elwha Transmission Main replacement $882,000 · Elwha underground $71,000 · Relay rebuilds - $149,000 · Fairmount Pump Station $27,000 · 2004 Water main improvements $23,000 · Water - New construction connections $58,000 · Pump station 1 & 3 $12,000 · Combined Sewer reduction $145,000 Leachate Pump Station $74,000 · Electric - new construction connections $676,000 · Oak Street sewer $64,000 · Park Street sewer $417,000 · Combined Sewer Outfall $29,000 · PAWTP transfer station $49,000 · Landfill gas system $112,000 · Landfill shoreline stabilization $390,000 · Landfill storm improvements $188,000 · Stormwater Crown Park outfall $8,000 · Stormwater portion pump station 1 & 3 $333,000 In 2005, the city utility funds received the following grants: · Department of Ecology $118,042 (operating) . Transportation Improvement Board $141,500 (capital) Capital Projects - Utilities Stormwater 9% E lectri c 22% SW-Landfill 19% Wastewater 21% H-63 Internal SerVices Funds Internal Services Funds are used to account for the financing of goods and services provided by one/ . department or fund to other departments or funds on a cost- reimbursement basis. There are three funds in this group: Equipment Services, Information Technology, and Self-Insurance. Internal Services Funds Exp. . Irtorrnation TectroIogy '10% SeIf-lnsuance 55% Equipment Services accumulated almost $5 million in cash reserves designated mostly for equipment replacement. In 2003, a policy was developed, which allows the Equipment Services Fund to charge real future replacement costs instead of purchase costs only. Currently, we have well developed replacement charges covering all cost and inflation. We are challenged to replace large or specialized equipment, such as the fire pumper or construction equipment, as the diversion of operational funds toward higher replacement cost contributions results in a large cost impact. Equipment purchases of $911,410 included: · two police vehicles · one fire department vehicle · one vehicle for engineering · four vehicles for parks · truck, eductor and brush chopper for streets · dump and regular truck for water · video van and truck for wastewater · rebuild of a manlift truck and purchase of mine excavator for the electric utility · two packer trucks and hybrid vehicle for solid waste collections . In addition, $250,000 was prepaid for delivery of a fire ladder truck. H-64 r-- : . . . Quality comrilUnications and data services are provided to all City staff through a secure, stable computer network operated by our Information Technology Division. Being a high tech digitally equipped city, our IT staff provides solutions to the technical needs of both staff and citizens. Technology improvements include better access to public information using Laserfiche and SQL database systems, giving the public faster access to a broader range of information; major financial system hardware upgrades designed to improve security and reliability; updating our internal email system to provide staff with better communications and to keep pace with mandated archiving requirements; wireless connectivity for police and fire for improved safety and communications; cost savings changes to our phone system to include voice over IP technology; and the addition of cameras in our parks to help provide for a safer community. These and many more projects are the work of our dedicated and committed team of IT professionals. Cash reserves at the end of 2005 were $690,953. $1,200 It is very challenging to manage the SelHnsurance Fund with two digit medical rate increases in the last several years. It is necessary to maintain a reasonable level of reserves to cover current claims and worker's compensation claims. My recommendation is that the City continue to maintain minimum reserves of one-half million dollars and mandatory reserves of $125,000 for workers' compensation. As of December 31, 2005, the cash reserves were $897,577 and $125,000 for workers compensation. $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 As always, I will be available to answer any questions at the Council meeting. H-65 .. >. . H-66 . . . DATE: To: FROM: SUBJECT: ~ORTANGELES WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO APRIL 4, 2006 CITY COUNCIL NATHAN A. WEST, PRINCIPAL PLANNER /1/ U REZ 06-02, REZONE OF PROPERTY FROM RS-II RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO IH INDUSTRIAL HEAVY - BRADOW Summary: A proposal to rezone approximately 24.86 acres from RS-II Residential Single Family to IH Industrial Heavy. Recommendation: Conduct Public Hearing and first reading of the attached ordinances with 14 findings and 6 conclusions in support of the proposed action. Background / Analysis: On March 8, 2006 the Planning Commission considered the application at a public hearing and recommended approval of the rezone by a unanimous vote. Staff recommends that Council approve the rezone request from Residential Single Family to Industrial Heavy. Three criteria are considered in a rezone. Those criteria are: (1) The Comprehensive Plan goals, policies and objectives; (2) site location; and (3) surrounding development. First Criteria: The property was designated on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as Industrial in May of2005 when annexed to the City. A change in zoning to Industrial Heavy is consistent with this designation. As proposed, the rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Growth Management Element, and Land Use Map Goals and Policies. Second Criteria: The site is located in the newly annexed western urban growth area. Surrounding zoning includes County - Rural Character Conservation 3 (RCC3) to the south and County - Industrial and Urban Very Low Density/Low Density (LD) to the north. City zoning includes Industrial Heavy (IH) zoning to the east, west, and south. Developed properties in the area are consistent with underlying zoning designations. ' Third Criteria: Existing development surrounding the site includes Erdmann Trucking, Harbinger Winery, Horizon Excavating and Port Angeles Hardwoods. Generally, surrounding development consists of industrial uses. Other Issues: The area was annexed to the City in 2005 and, in accordance with City policy, the site was brought into the City as residential single family (RS-II). At the request of the landowners and in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan, a change to Industrial Heavy was initiated for the majority of the annexed property. The subject properties were inadvertently excluded from an earlier action rezoning other annexed properties. ::-:',....,'_":""'_"="._~._,._..~' _.~:;:,""'1.~-=;.=.:.":::'..n:::.~"""',.~..~.=.,=::"r.="""."""""~~,,:..._'"".==-=.,,.-...-.:::...."',..,."="".._~.~~-r,.~";"".,.:':"":",..,,""""'~-"'.=,~_.__ ~ .==;:.....;.""""'=e;..-:::-~.",~.==:::::..~..,.,=:.="==7=-.,="":c,::"~.."....:"..,,..==-:::..==,,..-~=...=",=.=,.:....:.==---==-=o.:,o:-:.~==,.=.~....=.=.:o==.=""'~ I - 1 Of the approximately 796 acres of Industrial Heavy zoning exists in the City of Port Angeles only 320 acres remain undeveloped and 259 of these remaining acres are owned by the Port of Port .A~'1geles. The remaining acreage results in a limited industrial land base for the City. The proposed change will result in an additional 24 acres of Industrial Heavy Land . In summary: The criteria to be examined in determining whether a rezone should be approved are: (1) The Comprehensive Plan goals, policies and objectives (2) site location, and (3) surrounding development. The proposal satisfies these criteria and will contribute to the City's industrial land inventory . The staff report including an excerpt of the Planning Commission Minutes are attached for your information. Attachments: Ordinance, fmdings, and conclusions Maps Minutes Excerpt Staff Report . . I - 2 ....c-'"=-=-='~.=-_,__._.._,___...,.===,~==.,=="'=,=_=:c.-:-::-.:=.=="","",-'="'=--="""=,,,",==::';,~~"""'"'''''I:',,".=.._.~......._=...,_._....."_==~"'~""-='",_~=,,,,,,,,,===__,_,+,__,,,"'~=='._._:_,..,..__.....=.=._._~..._~=o:=.="~._~._.~.._~-== ,- . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, rezoning from RS-ll (Residential, Single Family) to ill (Industrial Heavy). WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Port Angeles has considered an application to rezone from RS-ll to ill 24.86 acres south ofHwy 101 between 2346 West HWy 101 and Eclipse Industrial Parkway, and described in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council approval of the rezone application; and WHEREAS, the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (Chapter4 3.21 C RCW) have been met; and . WHEREAS, the City Council, after conducting a public hearing and considering the Planning Commission's recommendation, fmds that there have been changes in circumstances since the current zoning of the property was adopted and that the proposed rezone is in the best interest of the City and its citizens and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. The Findings and Conclusions marked Exhibit B and attached are hereby adopted and entered. Section 2. The Official Zoning Map, Ordinance 2801 as amended, is hereby amended to change the zoning of that property described in Exhibit A from RS-11 (Residential, Single Family 11,000 square feet) to IH (Industrial Heavy). . - 1 - I - 1 Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to attach a copy ofthis Ordinance to the Official Zoning Map and to file certified copies with the Clallam County Auditor and CI,allam County Assessor. Section 4 - Effective Date. TIns Ordinance shall take effect five days following the date of its publication by summary. P ASS~D by the City Council ofthe City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of April, 2006. MAYOR ATTEST: Becky J. Upton, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William E. Bloor, City Attorney PUBLISHED: April , 2006 By Summary G:\Legal_ BackupIORDINANCES&RESOLUTlONS\2006-1 0.BradowRezone-032806. wpd March 28, 2006 - 2- I - 2 . . . -_.._-;::;=--:::-;--==,,""--=---..,.--====--~=~_-:-:-:=:=.:=-== ,::;~=:=.:=,,"_-::::=,:,,==--'--::-"'::-="":"_~"'~'=='::--==.'_.._--'=-""----------":=-=-=--=,,,,,,,-,~-,,--------===--,,,_._-~-:::':'=-=:::'=:'- - -.- - - . Exhibit A - Bradow REZ 06-02 Legal Description: Parcell: All of that portion of the SW1/4 oftheSEl/4 of Section 7, Township 30, Range 6 West, W.M., lying South of the Olympic Highway, containing twenty acres, more or less, according to the government survey thereof. Parcel 2: The El/2 ofthe SEl/4 of Government Lot 4, Section 7, Township 30 North, Range 6 West, W.M., EXCEPT right of way for State Highway. Parcel Nos 0630074301251000 and 0630073401500000, all in Clallam County, Washington. . . -3- I - 3 ,:.':=.==,~-=,"".=="..:;"==.","~_......-~=o.==="'='--::-_-=::=~=::::-.==-==c7~~~:==-,,"=.=:;::;..===-,,=-=""=:::::=====--==-==--=""'._~~..~,___-:=.-=:':"=::=="'_~-==::::::==_":""-==---==::--==:"r.:._._~._==--===--=:;:'="'= :2: <C ~ ~ .s:: LU ~ -) \J L 1 ~ W l ~ I - Q;JBOOOL , ~ ~HTl L x ~0~~~m~ 'p~ uosuae r r I I I -r-- - ~ ...J - ] -== =~ [Em l ~ L I -- '-, ( ~ , --..I --I .....s- 1 r =oorn f-- c-- I "'0 I c- o -~ - 0 Z 3: - "'0 ... 0 as - I d1 ~ if ) = - u 0 -1 'P~ lJodJ!V' , - \ 0.. ~ I...... _ - 0.. <( 6"n'ld ''''lJISTlj u/ asd!/:J3 --i W - z / - - 0 - N . - ;;;;;:; w ,---- rl- 0:: , ...... ~,J '- >-- (j) , 0 ::> \ r I L-- >- ... z ~ en '0 ~ Qi . u: - 0 . \ - 0 - <( r - = 0:: 00 ~ 'P~ ^a:l " ,,,- "-'~ L V - ~~ \ -I ~ N ---' Qj r- --l ~ ~ --i I-- - ra t---- a.. - L..-- . -I "-- - - - JI r ) - '- - \\ - ~ -' - >>'-. ' I- - JT" ~ i:" I \ \.A n. <. 1l 'p~ UOJawe8 'Z J g 00 "-v .-..(/)..-.. .. j~; I ~ ~ \ --..... I J. - :t ~ Q) Cl ra a.. . . . ".:...==:.:,-"~':.,,,,,,~...:::==.___._~_______~-,=,~..____._._=-'--,"""",=.O::--"':::-="':=..'t-=-,""-=-:---~:::====-_.___ ____._-....::=~-=-.===--==~____._.....___.__'=:::.==.=:::::__==__=_=,-- _....,.:,--~,=,.:::..":'."""r.===::"==-=". . . . r: ,ri~~, \~',;~l;""':;: Exhibit B CONDITIONS, FINDINGS, AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF REZ 06-02 BRADOW/NYHUS REZONE: Findings 1. On February 24, 2006, the City of Port Angeles, as requested by property owners, submitted a application to rezone approximately 24.86 acres from Residential Single Family RS-l1 to Industrial Heavy. The area was annexed to the City in June 2005 by Ordinance #3207. 2. The City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is intended as the guiding document in determining the consistency in zoning and establishing a conceptual framework for land use decisions. The map designates the property as Industrial. 3. The property is described as E2SE LT 4 EXC R\W & PT S HWY 5.20A and UND Yz INT IN SWSE SO OF HWY 19.66A and consists of2318, 2324, 2154 and 2156 West Highway 101 and is located between 2346 W. Hwy 101 and PA Hardwoods. Theparcel numbers for the properties are 63007340150, and 63007430125. 4. The subject site is partially developed with single family residences and ancillary structures. 5. The purpose of the IH zone (P AMC 17.34.010) is "This is the least restrictive industrial zone intended to be the area in which heavy industry could develop causing the least impact on other land uses. Signi.fi~tmt adverse impacts can be expected from permitted industrial uses that involve hazardous materials, noise, air and water pollution, ~hift work around the clock, entertainment businesses with adult-only activities, and outside storage yards and manufacturing activities. This zone provides the basic urban land use I patternfor heavy industrial uses with direct access to major transportationfacUities, design standards for greater truck traffic, and buffersfor nonindustrial uses unless deemed impractical. " 6. County Zoning in the area includes County - Rural Character Conservation 3 (RCC3) to the south, County - Industrial and Urban Very Low Density/Low Density (LD) to the north. City zoning includes Industrial Heavy (IH) zoning to the east, west and south. Developed properties in the area are consistent with underlying zoning designations. 7. A rezone proposal cannot be considered a spot zone if it meets the following tests: 1) the parcel of land has not been singled out for special and privileged treatment; 2) the singling out is in the public interest and not only for the benefit of the land owner; and 3) the action is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. 8. The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed in its entirety with respect to the proposal. The following elements, goals, and policies were found to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A, and Policies A.l (a); Land Use Map Goal A and I - 5 Policy A.I,2; Land Use Element Industrial Goals G and Policy G.l; Goal H and Policy H.3. 9. The inventory of Industrial Heavy (IH) zoned land is approximately 796 acres. Additionally, the existing Heavy Industrial zoning is approximately 60% developed and a majority ofthis undeveloped land is owned by the Port of Port Angeles. . 10. Two county delineated wetlands exist on site including a creek and pond. Future development will be required to comply with the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Ordinance Section 15.20 and the Wetlands Protection Ordinance Section 15.24. 11. The SEP A Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance on March 3, 2006. 12. The public comment and notification period for the Planning Commission meeting ran from February 26 to March 8, 2006. Mailing labels were provided by the applicant. Surrounding property owners were notified that the request was for Industrial Heavy. 13. The City's Public Works and Utilities Department did not have any comment. Available utilities to the sites include: City power, and Dry Creek water. City sewer extends to Eclipse Industrial Parkway and can be extended by future developers. The Fire Department has noted that industrial use ofthe property would be subjectto applicable fire protection provisions, including the provision of adequate fire flow. . 14. Future development of the subject property will require specific project review including issues such as access, noise, lighting, landscaping and environmentally sensitive review. Conclusions: 1. The proposal is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map as this area is designated as Industrial. Based on this designation staff is recommending approval of the proposed rezone. 2. Future development proposals should mitigate all environmental concerns regarding the wetlands onsite. 3. Future development proposals should anticipate the necessity to install fire protection provlslOns. 4. The rezone is compatible with the surrounding zoning and land uses and will allow development of the site to a higher density that has been identified as desired for the area by the City through its Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation and is therefore in the public interest. . I - 6 .,.::_,:~==':;'-::;;--:;;;":.=~==,.,,,::=,=,,-":::,,",,~o::.'::::::.::""~oo=::;-:=c..::""':.'.".~C~-==_":::.""'==-'=':';:C;".r:t..",..;::o==_:;-_-."'=,",'==:--'~"'-~_--=-=_=~_-==::-=~":::=--====.==--._____-===::.:::'::"=""==-~__ ~...~..,'___;__=:=====::'_:,=_c:::=__=_~==.::=""=_""~, . 5. The City's action on rezone application 'fJ:z 06-02 is consistent with the established procedures for amending the Zoning Code set forth in Section 17.96.100, Port Angeles Municipal Code. 6. Development plans may require further utility improvement by the developer. As no adverse impacts to neighboring streets are anticipated and street, walkway, and drainage will be also required with subsequent development, the proposed rezone is in the public interest. Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of April 4, 2006. Karen Rogers, Mayor Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk . 1:\Rezone Applications\ordinance findings Bradow.doc . I - 7 ',~;';=:=_____._.-=='==~;;;;=""'=_~~;::::=='"'''':=~,",","""==,=,,,,~~,':::7=::;-..~<""--~='-:,,--__~=-~",,,,,"=~_=_:::,;':"=r=---=:~':-~===~"'''''--:>==::-~"",,=:''==~-=;=-===_=_._.,___.~.___-:::.=._._.._._.,__..__.__.__~.__..__.__..:;. . . . I - 8 -.JU UU UU LJO r- r- r rnnn I . f-1= f- f- -v,p pO- t- f- f- CJ '-r" t- '-- t- -0 r-n- f*-:. 1/ u: 'lin () "iJ. D I jBJ o ni ~ ([ Z IJ"=b 0 ~ ~ ~ U -oJ a.. a.. , <( W I Z 0 . \ N - w 0 0:: ~ (f) ::> I >- Z r- ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~. . ~ ~ CO I $r:P 0. o . 10" I II I U .L ;= I .~ cD 0.11,0" bo.: f-i "d~ '-- . !: 1!.S J IJ",J l o~ tJa 0 I I} ( /F: -%-LJo1", rOom O~=~ 'P& ilOd./IV ~ 0 CJ \ ",- I~ ~ 8 ~ "1""'"3 ~~ ~: \a~ ~ E ...r;:., J: LW - - I'\... .:@ D~~~. . ~~I 'p~^a::l ! 0 ~ - p ( D~ 0 8; /0 Coo o~ , [] P J "G 0<:1 c;:> "it' o I . f), o . 00 em I ~ ~ " ( ~ ~ /3[f El ~ -'- .~ :> ~ '- w 0>!2 @~.~ ~s 0, I a .r;;;- iJ' ~ ~ ~ ~'o Q oJ.) g.. ~ r--~ t .~ D [] a ii .0 .!f \~~ ~ ~~ 0 ~ Be;, \ <>- 0 (i'la ~ (\ \ ~ "1J t--- nO cD '" "0 (! ~ c 0 m~ I--- == \,./.----- '-../'" - . \ \ J. - ~ r-- () ~L 0. "0 o ~D~ ~~ '----'-'-' o .\ ,!:; "' "0 Qj ~ j o IJ 'p~ UOJIDV~ """ . a [;f' 1:1 iJ I . aD [j "'. IJ o ~ o \~ ~ ..~ o ~\ U \ I)- t ~". -~,'. \ L r- ~~ \ \ r y 'CjJ o q [ fb . o o c '--- ~ Q ;.T - I - . '\ () '0 .~ ~, o ..- ~ . . . I - 10 . . . . I - 12 1 " I <,;i:~l ~ ~_~_-=,-_,~"'---~4,:,~:;(~fJ . . . I - 14 tl ~ ~ ! .c ~ '" .. ~ ~ ~ ~ f 8:d 1~.~....'.~.i...I.'. ~D ~ -J u~.._ ~ T_I "'-1/1. ,._1 II / I HI! I-- f- '- - i-" :- f--f- f- IT ::: Ii I - J - I - \-. "-- --.: ~z o ~ () .....J 0- 0- <( W Z o N W 0::: (f) :::::> I >- Z ~ o o <( 0::: CO '-- '<: ...~ \ . -,. I , PJBOODL f-rnn r \ i=~f!JW~~ ~ H:: rnm ( J? =t= ~ JDOrn I : Jl I I ttJ=~~_ I - tf -~ - - -I;--- L Z ~ /{ - I { I I-- n~ 'PtI UOSUi3 - 1 , ~ - - ] lr;L ~ / t--- r--- / -; [II \ ",>- --- ---1- 'I ~J ,---.... 'PtllJodJ!\;f ,U \ ./-- f-- L r ~ - v- r ~ 'PtI f.i3=l r- '-- - LL PiW= l-f- f-f- u r-. ~- I- I ~\ ~\ f---c- ,+. ~ 'PtI UOJi3UJe8 f-- I r--- J::= ..~-V-_ >-- ~ --:JOJ . . . Planning Commission Minutes March 8.2006 Page 12 REZONE PROPOSAL -REZ 06-02 - BRADOW/NYHUS: Rezone from RS-ll Residential Single Familv to IH Industrial Heavy. Principle Planner Nathan West reviewed the Department's Report recommending approval ofthe proposed rezone to Industrial Heavy. Planner West noted that the area was annexed into the City in 2005 as residential because that is what the property was classified as while in the county. Other properties in the annexation area that border the subject site have already been rezoned to Industrial Heavy. The property owners requested this rezone. Chair Kidd opened the public hearing. There was no one to speak to the issue, however, staff stated that City staff is representing this proposal at this point as the area was inadvertently left out of earlier rezone review. Chair Kidd closed the public hearing. Following brief discussion regarding the previous rezone review of areas annexed in 2005 and other uses in the subject area, Commissioner Matthews moved to recommend approval of the rezone as proposed citing the following findings and conclusions: Findin~s 1. On February 24, 2006, the City of Port Angeles, as requested by property owners, submitted a application to rezone approximately 24.86 acres from Residential Single Family RS-ll to Industrial Heavy. The area was annexed to the City in June 2005 by Ordinance #3207. 2. The City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is intended as the guiding document in determining the consistency in zoning and establishing a conceptual framework for land use decisions. The map designates the property as Industrial. 3, The property is described as E2SE LT 4 EXC R\W & PT S HWY 5.20A and UND 12 INT IN SWSE SO OF HWY 19.66A and consists of2318, 2324, 2154 and 2156 West Highway 101 and is located between 2346 W. Hwy 101 and PAHardwoods. The parcel numbers for the properties are 63007340150, and 63007430125. 4. The subject site is partially developed with single family residences and ancillary structures. 5. The purpose of the IH zone (PAMC 17.34.010) is "This is the least restrictive industrial zone intended to be the area in which heavy industry could develop causing the least impact on other land uses. Significant adverse impacts can be expected from permitted industrial uses that involve hazardous materials,. noise, air and water pollution, shift work around the clock, entertainment businesses with adult-only activities, and outside storage yards and manufacturing activities. This zone provides the basic urban land use pattern for heavy industrial uses with direct access to. major transportation facilities, design standards for greater truck traffic, and buffers for nonindustrial uses unless deemed impractical. " 6. County Zoning in the area includes County - Rural Character Conservation 3 (RCC3) to the south, County - Industrial and Urban Very Low Density/Low Density (LD) to the north. I - 17 Planning Commission Minutes March 8, 2006 Page 13 7. City zoning includes Industrial Heavy (ill) zoning to the east, west and south. Developed properties in the area are consistent with underlying zoning designations. A rezone proposal cannot be considered a spot zone if it meets the following tests: 1) the parcel of land has not been singled out for special and privileged treatment; 2) the singling out is in the public interest and not only for the benefit ofthe land owner; and 3) the action is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. . 8. The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed in its entirety with respect to the proposal. The following elements, goals, and policies were found to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A, and Policies A.I (a); Land Use Map Goal A and Policy A.1 ,2; Land Use Element Industrial Goals G and Policy G.1; Goal H and Policy H.3. 9. The inventory of Industrial Heavy (rn) zoned land is approximately 796 acres. Additionally, the existing Heavy Industrial zoning is approximately 60% developed and a majority ofthis undeveloped land is owned by the Port of Port Angeles. 10. Two county delineated wetlands exist on site including a creek and pond. Future development will be required to comply with the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Ordinance Section 15.20 and the Wetlands Protection Ordinance Section 15.24. 11. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance on March 3, 2006. . 12. The public comment and notification period for the Planning Commission meeting ran from February 26 to March 8, 2006. Mailing labels were provided by the applicant. Surrounding property owners were notified that the request was for Industrial Heavy. I 13. The City's Public Works and Utilities Department did not have any comment. Available utilities tothe sites include: City power, and Dry Creek water. City sewer extends to Eclipse Industrial Parkway and can be extended by future developers. The Fire Department has noted that industrial use of the property would be subject to applicable fire protection provisions, including the provision of adequate fireflow. 14. Future development of the subject property will require specific project review including issues such as access, noise, lighting, landscaping and environmentally sensitive review. Conclusions: A. The proposal is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map as this area is designated as Industrial. Based on this designation staff is recommending approval of the proposed rezone. B. Future development proposals should mitigate all environmental concerns regarding the wetlands onsite. . I - 18 . . . Planning Commission Minutes March 8, 2006 Page 14 c. Future development proposals should anticipate the necessity to install fire protection provIsIons. D. The rezone is compatible with the surrounding zoning and land uses and will allow development ofthe site to a higher density that has been identified as desired for the area by the City through its Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation and is therefore in the public interest. E. The City's action on rezone application REZ 06-02 is consistent with the established procedures for amending the Zoning Code set forth in Section 17.96.100, Port Angeles Municipal Code. F. Development plans may require further utility improvement by the developer. As no adverse impacts to neighboring streets are anticipated and street, walkway, and drainage will be also required with subsequent development, the proposed rezone is in the public interest. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kalish and passed unanimously. I - 19 e e. I e I - 20 . . . FORTANGELES WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: March 8,2006 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Nathan West, Principal Planner RE: REZ 06-02 APPLICANT: City of Port Angeles OWNERS: Russell V. Bradow, Christina Nyhus, and Nyhus Investments LLC LOCATION: South ofS.R.lOl between 2346 West Hwy 101 and Eclipse Industrial Parkway. Rezone from Residential Single Family (RS-ll) to Industrial Heavy (IH) REQUEST: RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division of the Department of Community & Economic Development recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to Industrial Heavy (IH) for rezone application REZ 06-02 to the City Council citing 14 findings and 6 conclusions included in Attachment A to this staff report. PROPOSAL: An application was submitted by the City of Port Angeles on February 24, 2006 requesting a rezone of approximately 24.86 acres of property from RS-ll Residential Single Family to rH. At a meeting held on May 4, 2005 addressing annexation of the subject property, the City agreed to conduct a comprehensive review of the zoning applied to the annexation area and would bear the costs of such review. SITE DEVELOPMENTIBACKGROUND: The subject property is legally described as the E2SE LT 4 EXC R\W & PT S HWY 5.20A and UND Y2INT IN SWSE SO OF HWY 19.66A. The subject site consists of2318, 2324,2154 and 2156 West Highway 101 and is located between 2346 W. Highway 101 and Eclipse Industrial Parkway (parcels 63007340150 and 63007430125). I - 21 Department of Community & Economic Development Staff Report REZ 06-02 March 8, 2006 Page 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW The property was designated on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as Industrial in . May of2005 when annexed to the City. The entire Comprehensive Plan was reviewed with respect to the proposal and the goals and policies found in Attachment B were found to be the most relevant to the proposal. ZONING CODEIDEVELOPMENT REGULATION REVIEW The purpose of the Zoning Code is to implement the goals, policies, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan by dividing the City into zones, and to promote the orderly and expected development of properties within the City as directed by the Plan. A description of the Industrial Heavy (IH) zone is noted below: IH (PAMC 17.34.010) Purpose: "This is the least restrictive industrial zone intended to be the area in which heavy industry could develop causing the least impact on other land uses. Significant adverse impacts can be expected from permitted industrial uses that involve hazardous materials, noise, air and water pollution, shift work around thee/ock, entertainment businesses with adult-only activities, and outside storage yards and manufacturing activities. This zone provides the basic urban land use pattern for heavy industrial uses with direct access to major transportation facilities, design standards for greater truck traffic, and buffers for nonindustrial uses unless deemed impractical. " . PAMC 17.96.100 Amendments (Rezones). A. In determining if an amendment to these regulations is needed, the City Council shall give due consideration to the proper relationship of such amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and the entire Zoning Regulations; it being the intent to retain the integrity and validity of the zones herein described and to avoid any isolated spot zoning changes in the Zoning Map. B. Any amendments adopted by the Council may be modified from the form in which they were advertised within the limits necessary to relate properly such amendment or amendments to the Zoning Regulations. Final action on such modifications shall be subject to review and report of the Planning Commission prior to final passage by the City Council. C. No applicationfor a change of zoning of any lot, parcel or portion thereofshall be considered by the Council within one year of the final action of the Council upon a prior application covering any of the same described land This provision, however, shall not impair the right of the Council to propose by their own action any amendment or change in the boundaries of any of the zones in these regulations. . I - 22 . . . ,I L;:: ~,,;;,.~ r~, ; ; r';-'~ Department of Community & Economic Development Staff Report REZ 06-02 - City of Port Angeles March 8, 2006 Page 3 Certain criteria are required to be met for the approval of rezones which are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. A rezone proposal is not.considered to be a spot zone ifit meets the following three tests: 1) the parcel of land has not been singled out for special and privileged treatment; 2) the singling out is in the public interest and not only for the benefit of the land owner; and 3) the action is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. Consistency with the Zoning Ordinance includes maintaining the validity, purpose, and intent of the established zones as well as avoiding spot zones. Consistency with the policy to protect neighborhood character is a main issue that needs to be addressed Given that Comprehensive Plan consistency can be found with the current proposal, compliance with the Zoning Code can then be made by the proposal. ENVIRONMENT AL REVIEW Two county delineated wetlands exist on site including a creek and pond. Future development will be required to comply with the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Ordinance Section 15.20 and the Wetlands Protection Ordinance Section 15.24 PAMC. In accordance with Section 15.24.010 B, "It is the policy of the City of Port Angeles to require site planning to avoid or minimize damage to wetlands wherever possible; to require that activities not dependent on a wetland location be located at upland sites; and to achieve no net loss of wetlands or creation of new wetlands to offset losses which are unavoidable. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the proposed rezone on March 3, 2006, which satisfies the City's responsibility under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). PUBLIC COMMENTS The public comment and notification period for the Planning Commission meeting ran from February 26 to March 8, 2006. Surroimding property owners were notified that the request is for Industrial Heavy. No objections were received. The Fire Department The Fire Department has no objections to the rezone and has advised that: 1. Structures typical for IH zone would be much more likely to need increased fireflow and/or fire sprinkler systems than those in the RS-1l zone. It is likely that the water main that ends at Eclipse Industrial Parkway will need to be extended to support development. The Police Department had no comments regarding the proposed rezone. The Public Works and Utilities Department indicated that they have no comments regarding the proposed rezone. STAFF ANALYSIS The City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is intended as the guiding document in determining the consistency in zoning and establishing a conceptual framework for land use decisions. At a meeting held on May 25, 2005, the Planning Commission resolved to amend the Comprehensive Plan with regard to the subject parcels. As a result of this recommendation, the City Council amended the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map in June of 2005 identifying the area as Industrial (I). I - 23 Department of Community & Economic Development Staff Report REZ 06-02 March 8, 2006 Page 4 The area was annexed to the City in 2005 and, in accordance with City policy, the site was brought into the City as residential single family (RS-ll). At the request of the landowners and in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan, a change to Industrial Heavy was initiated for the majority of the annexed property. The subject properties were inadvertently excluded from the earlier action. In regard to the proposed Industrial Heavy zoning, it is noted that the change is consistent with the surrounding zoning and land uses. As noted in the table below a substantial amount of Industrial Heavy zoning is presently undeveloped in the city, however out of approximately 320 undeveloped acres 259 acres are owned by the Port of Port Angeles. The remaining acreage results in a limited industrial land base for the City. The proposed change will result in an additional 24 acres of Industrial Heavy Land. . % % Parcels Acres Parcels Acres %Dev %Dev Undev Undev Zone Parcels Acres Dev Dev Undev Undev (parcels) (acres) (parcels) (acres) IH 166 796 114 476 52 320 69% 60% 31% 40% IL 176 799 88 685 88 114 50% 86% 50% . 14% Total 342 1596 202 1161 140 434 59% 73% 41% 27% A proposed change to Industrial Heavy is consistent with the adjoining zones to the east, west and south. The respective lot sizes meet the minimum requirements for the Industrial Heavy zone and the proposal is consistent with both the Port Angeles Municipal Code and Comprehensive Plan. . Attachments - A. Recommended Findings and Conclusions B. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Information C. Application D. Maps . I - 24 . . . Department of Community & Economic Development Staff Report REZ 06-02 - City of Port Angeles March 8, 2006 Page 5 / i Attachment A Findings and Conclusions in Support of REZ 06-02 - CITY OF PORT ANGELES Findin2s 1. On February 24, 2006, the City of Port Angeles, as requested by property owners, submitted a application to rezone approximately 24.86 acres from Residential Single Family RS-ll to Industrial Heavy. The area was annexed to the City in June 2005 by Ordinance #3207. 2. The City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is intended as the guiding document in determining the consistency in zoning and establishing a conceptual framework for land use decisions. . The map designates the property as Industrial. 3. The property is described as E2SE LT 4 EXC R\W & PT S HWY 5.20A and UND Y2 TNT TN SWSE SO OF HWY 19.66A and consistsof2318, 2324, 2154 and 2156 West Highway 101 and is located between 2346 W. Hwy 101 and PA Hardwoods. The parcel numbers for the properties are 63007340150, and 63007430125. 4. The subject site is partially developed with single family residences and ancillary structures. 5. The purpose of the IH zone (P AMC 17.34.0 I 0) is "This is the least restrictive industrial zone intended to be the area in which heavy industry could develop causing the least impact on other land uses. Significant adverse impacts can be expected from permitted industrial uses that involve hazardous materials, noise, air and water pollution, shift work around the clock, entertainment businesses with adult-only activities, and outside storage yards and manufacturing activities. This zone provides the basic urban land use patternfor heavy industrial uses with direct access to major transportafionfacilifies, design standards for greater truck traffic, and buffers for nonindustrial uses unless deemed impractical. " 6. County Zoning in the area includes County - Rural Character Conservation 3 (RCC3) to the south, County - Industrial and Urban Very Low DensitylLow Density (LD) to the north. City zoning includes Industrial Heavy (IH) zoning to the east, west and south. Developed properties in the area are consistent with underlying zoning designations. 7. A rezone proposal cannot be considered a spot zone ifit meets the following tests: 1) the parcel of land has not been singled out for special and privileged treatment; 2) the singling out is in the public interest and not only for the benefit of the land owner; and 3) the action is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. 8. The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed in its entirety with respect to the proposal. The following elements, goals, and policies were found to be most relevant to the proposal: I - 25 Department of Community & Economic Development Staff Report March 8, 2006 Page 6 Growth Management Element Goal A, and Policies A.l (a); Land Use Map Goal A and . Policy A.l ,2; Land Use Element Industrial Goals G and Policy G.l; Goal H and Policy H.3. - 9. The inventory of Industrial Heavy (IH) zoned land is approximately 796 acres. Additionally, the existing Heavy Industrial zoning is approximately 60% developed and a majority of this undeveloped land is owned by the Port of Port Angeles. 10. Two county delineated wetlands exist on site including a creek and pond. Future development will be required to comply with the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Ordinance Section 15.20 and the Wetlands Protection Ordinance Section 15.24. 11. The SEP A Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance on March 3, 2006. 12. The public comment and notification period for the Planning Commission meeting ran from February 26 to March 8, 2006. Mailing labels were provided by the applicant. Surrounding property owners were notified that the request was for Industrial Heavy. 13. The City's Public Works and Utilities Department did not have any comment. Available utilities to the sites include: City power, and Dry Creek water. City sewer extends to Eclipse Industrial Parkway and can be extended by future developers. The Fire Department has noted that industrial use of the property would be subject to applicable fire protection provisions, including the provision of adequate fireflow. . 14. Future development of the subject property will require specific project review including issues such as access, noise, lighting, landscaping and environmentally sensitive review. Conclusions: 1. The proposal is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map as this area is designated as Industrial. Based on this designation staff is recommending approval of the proposed rezone. 2. Future development proposals should mitigate all environmental concerns regarding the wetlands onsite. 3. Future development proposals should anticipate the necessity to install fire protection prOVISIons. 4. The rezone is compatible with the surrounding zoning and land uses and will allow . development of the site to a higher density that has been identified as desired for the area by the City through its Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation and is therefore in the public interest. I - 26 . . . . : ,< j.; ~ 1;' :>.fr, ~j.:. , Department of Community & Economic Development Staff Report March 8, 2006 REZ 05-02 - City of Port Angeles Page 7 5. The City's action on rezone applicationREZ 06-02 is consistent with the established procedures for amending the Zoning Code set forth in Section 17.96.100, Port Angeles Municipal Code. 6. Development plans may require further utility improvement by the developer. As no adverse impacts to neighboring streets are anticipated and street, walkway, and drainage will be also required with subsequent development, the proposed rezone is in the public interest. I - 27 Department of Community & Economic Development Staff Report March 8, 2006 Page 8 ATTACHMENT B . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW The subject property was designated on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as Industrial in May of2005. The entire Comprehensive Plan was reviewed with the elements, goals, and policies found to be the most relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A. "To manage growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial to the community as a whole, is sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals and is consistent with the State of Washington's Growth Management Act. " Policy 1. "In all its actions and to the extent consistent with the provisions of this comprehensive plan. the City shall strive to implement the following goals of the State Growth Management Act: " a. "Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. " Land Use Map Goals and Policies . Goal A. "To guide current and future development within the City in a manner that provides certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the challenges and opportunities of the future. " Policies 1, The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map should be used as a conceptual guide for determining current and long-range zoning and other land use decisions. The map's land use designations are intended to show areas where general land use types are allowed. The area between land use designations should be considered an imprecise margin in order to provide flexibility in determining the boundary of such areas. When determining appropriate zoning designations for an area near a margin, the goals, policies and objectives of the Land Use Element should take precedence, 2. All land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council and/or any of its appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and its land use map. Land Use Element Industrial Goals and Policies . I - 28 . . . Department of Community & Economic Development Staff Report March 8, 2006 REZ 05-02 - City of Port Angeles Page 9 Goal G. To create and maintain a healthy and diverse industrial sector for a balanced and stable local economy. Policies 1. The City should promote a cooperative intergovernmental plan for comprehensive development of industrial infrastructure and amenities to attract and support light and heavy industry. Goal H. To provide opportunities for industrial development in a manner, which efficiently uses the community's various attributes and natural resources, has minimal impact on the environment, contributes to the City's quality of life, and is compatible with the desired urban design of the City. Policies 3. Industrial areas should buffer their impact to mitigate nuisance and hazardous characteristics such as noise, particulate matter in the air, water or odor pollution, or objectionable visual material. Port An2eles Municipal Code 17.34.020 Permitted Uses. A. Automobile body, fender, laundry, paint shops and wrecking yards. B. Bakeries, wholesale. C. Battery rebuild, tire repair & recapping. D. Boiler works. E. Book, newspaper & magazine printing & publishing. F. Bottling plants, creameries. G. Cabinet and carpenter shops. H. City pound (animal shelter). 1. Draying, freight & trucking yards and terminals. J. Dry cleaning: clothes, carpets, rugs, laundries. K. Night club, pool hall, dance hall, boxing arena, penny arcade, shooting gallery, adult entertainment business, or similar amusement enterprise. L. Sawmills, paper mills, pulp mills. M. Ship building, storage, repair, boat havens, marinas. N. Storage yards; building materials, tractors, trucks, boats, equipment. O. Transportation or freight terminal. P. Truck, trailer, motorcycle, repairing, overhauling, rental, sales. Q. Utility buildings and structures. R. Veterinary clinics, offices, and kennels. S. Warehousing, distributing plants. T. Wood products manufacture. U. Manufacturing, processing, packing, storage of: I. alcohol 2. brick, tile or terra-cotta 3. brooms, brushes I - 29 ) Department of Community & Economic Development Staff Report March 8, 2006 Page 10 4. celluloid or similar cellulose materials 5. cloth, cord or rope 6. concrete 7. electrical products and appliances 8. food and food products 9. kelp reduction 10. lumber 17 - 89 12/2004 17.34.020 17.34.060 11. machinery 12. paper and pulp 13. prefabricated buildings 14. signs, all types 15. salt works 16. vegetable or other food oil. (Ord. 3180 ~ 1 (part), 12/17/2004; Ord. 3059 94 (part), 7/28/2000; Ord. 3053 93 6/16/2000; Ord. 3042 93 (part) 1/28/00 Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 96 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 91 (part), 12/22170) 17.34.030 Accessory Uses. Accessory uses determined by the Planning Director to be compatible with the intent of this Chapter are permitted. (Ord. 2921 915,6/28/96) 17.34.040 Conditional Uses. A. Distillation of wood, coal or bones or manufacture of any of their by-products. B. Fire Stations. C. Fuel yards subject to the limitations contained in P AMC 14.21.030 (B). D. Gas (illuminating or heating) manufacture or storage subject to the limitations contained in PAMC 14.21.030(A). E. Manufacturing, processing, packing, storage of: 1. asphalt 2. chemicals 3. ceramics 4. drugs, pharmaceuticals 5. perfumes 6. paint, lampblack, varnish, oil, turpentine 7. plastics 8. soap and soap products, toiletries 9. tar roofing or waterproofing. F. Sale of marine supplies. G. Off-premises outdoor advertising signs. H. Power, light or steam plant. 1. Retail establishments incidental to a use permitted under Section 17.34.020 when located on the same zoning lot as the permitted use. J. Restaurants, cafeterias. K. Other uses compatible with the intent of this Chapter. (Ord. 3180 91 (part), 12/17/2004; Ord. 2999 92 (part), 9/11/98; Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2806 91, 5/13/94; Ord. 275295,3/26/93; Ord. 2668 96 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 2636 911, 15/15/91) . . . I-3D . ,<,' .~:::!:~:~~~,,:~::"'f'~ ) Fee: $450 & Sepa ($150) '-:""':: PORT ANGE'LES :', ,,~~~Q}~~! ArRXJIC~~~ON .';:t~~T;~~\;: PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING THIS FORM 1. (A) APPLICANT City of Port Angeles Daytime Phone 417-4751 Address 321 East Fifth Street Phone (B) PROPERTY OWNER (if other than applicant) Russell V. Bradow. Christina Nyhus. Nyhus Investments LLC Property Owner's Address (if other than applicant) 2318 West Highwav101 Port Angeles. W A. P.O. Box 1212 Port Angeles. W A. 3705 SW 17151 Street Seattle. W A 98166-3147 Daytime Phone . (C) APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE if other than applicant or property owner Phone 2. (A) Legal Description of Subject Property E2SE LT 4 EXC R\W & PT S HWY 5.20A UND Yz INT IN SWSE SO OF HWY 19.66A (B) General Location of Subject Property The Prooertv is located between 2346 W. Hwv 101 and PA Hardwoods 3. Size of Subject Property 1.082.901.6 sq.ft. NA blocks 24.86 acres. 4. Zoning of Subject Property RS-ll Proposed Zoning Designation IH 5. Characteristics of Subject Property (how is it developed) The subject property is primarily vacant but contains approximately three (3) residences. 6. Characteristics of Surrounding Area (what uses are around the property) The property is surrounded by industrial, commercial and a variety of residential uses. 7. Comprehensive Plan Designation of Property Industrial 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation of Surrounding Properties Commercial and Industrial 9. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies V(H(l. 3. )) \ I - 31 -;;: ~. 1~' ,; "". '..''':;;: . ... .'. . . PORT ANGELES , REZONE APi]i€1tXION ~:~~l::;;~;:~';' '. 10. JUSIIFICA IION FOR ZONING CHANGE (A) Relationship to Comprehensive Plan The comprehensive plan has designated this site as industrial. (B) Suitability of Property for Proposed Zoning The property is suitable for industrial use due its close proximity to S.R. 10]. and nearby industrial activities. (C) Change in Circumstances Since Original Zoning The property was recently annexed and was previously zoned Urban Very Low Density I Low Density by the county. (D) Inappropriateness of Current Zoning The present zoning is RS-Il, however, the intended residential use is not suitable for the site considering it is surrounded by industrial zoning and its close proximity to S.R. 101. . 11. I CERTIFY that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and acknowledge that wilful misrepresentation of information will immediately terminate this application._ /7/-r- .- 'M/1 .V~ SIGNATURE 2/zlIlor/ I ' Date CITY OF PORT ANGELES Planning Department, 321 East Fifth Street, P. O. Box I 150, Port Angeles. WA 98362 (360) 417-4750 . . .".'.' ...... .'... .......m ._",._~,...___._...._ _.,..........~_.~__.~_.. .__."._...'_'~" __v_....____,,__......._.. .._....... "'___"_"___ ..._._.__...-....~...-~~"._._.... ,,"---.-' ---.. .~.....__.-.._.'"_.-._--,. .._~---... ..-~.~._.~..._'...~...;~- ..._.--~'"._._~~~._......"_....~ ".-"_."--"--"'''-''~' ..... . .'. ............-... ..~..."...j........_....._...-~,,~....- ....,.."".....-......*...- I - 32 pr-') \J I l- . OJEJOOOL ~JJrnrn[ ~~~~rBnn ( k l:fI r-oorn- Dt:: = I - ~ - z o J 5 f- ...J a.. I-- a.. - <( W f- Z 4i~ ::> I >- Z . --- S o o "- ~ ;;0;; a:l - w I-- "-- 1--- - r--- - =11 / I-- ,~j~i:~. ~/ ;~~~; '_.~ . :,,; / W- ~ I-- T -.-, nr-rl I L I . 'p~ uosuaa - I ~L rir i 'p~ ~odJ!V' U f- - \ \ /Y L-\ \ I \ r vf- -~ 'p~ ,{a:l r- LR f-- P ,--- \ \\T - ~ 1-1- I- ~ \ ~ - \ 'p~ UOJawe::> ~'v IT t\ I Z*_ \ \ \ "" r--"" .' r - 33 ------ -------- t . . . I - 34 . . . F. .'...... '0'" R' .T......:P;.' '. .N...G'.'E.;.....Li. E'''''S'.' 1m) < .! ,J '1' I . ! I ii ; i. I '. r ", ." . J ,I,j .. ., .........r...: ".., ...1........., .. WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO DATE: April 4, 2006 To: CITY COUNCIL FROM: Sue Roberds, Planning Manager SUBJECT: LUNDERVILLE - STY 05-04 PORTION OF "F" STREET SOUTH OF 12TH STREET Summarv: Vacation of right-of-way. Recommendation: Conduct the public hearing and a first reading of an ordinance in support of the proposed vacation of right-of-way. Backeround / Analysis: On March 22, 2006, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing in review of a petition for the vacation of a portion ofthe unopened "F" Street right-of-way located immediately south of West Ith Stfeetandno:0:h ofthe Stevens Middle School property (see attached map). The additional property is desired in order to enlarge an existing property owned by petitioner Lunderville and will consist of one-half of the right-of-way. The remaining right-of-way will be retained by the City for future access purposes to the school site. The Port Angeles School District has ,no interest in obtaining any additional property but is participating in the action in support of petitioner Lunderville. No issues of concern were raised during the public hearing process. Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve vacation of the right-of-way. The Council should conduct a first reading of the ordinance and continue final action to the regular meeting of April 18. Staff s report and an excerpt of the Planning Commission action is attached for your review. Staff will be available for questions. Attachments: Ordinance, condition, fmdings, and conclusions Planning COrrmllssion Minutes excp:rpt Staff report . ;- T:\FORMS\Councilmemolunderville. wpd lJ - i . ,. . . J - 2 I. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, vacating a portion of "F" Street in Port Angeles, Clallarn County, Washington. WHEREAS, a petition is on file with the City of Port Angeles to a vacate portion of "F" Street in Port Angeles, Clallarn County, Washington; and WHEREAS, street vacations ~e 9~tegorically exempt from the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) rules as set forth in WAC 197-11-800(2)(h); and WHEREAS, a public hearing ha.s.been held by the City Council following public notice pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW; and WHEREAS, said vacation appears to be of benefit to and in the interest of the public; . and WHEREAS, the City Council finds $4.80 per square foot to be the fair market value of the vacated right-of-way; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CIn:- ,COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows: Section 1 - Vacation. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, the following right-of-way, as depicted on Exhibit "A", is hereby vacated: The north half of the "F" Stre~tright-of-way abutting Block 367 ' and Block 368, except the westerly 20' of said "F" Street right- of-way abutting Lot 1, Bloclc367, Townsite of Port Angeles, Clallam County, Washington. Section 2 - Compensation. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.030, the compensation required for . -1- 'J - 3 the vacation of this street is $16,800.00. Section 3 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective only upon the payment of . the required $ ~ 6,800.00. Upon that satisfaction, the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish this Ordinance and to file a certified copy with the Clallam County Auditor and the Clallam County Assessor. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of April, 2'006. MAYOR ATTEST: Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: :'... . . William E. Bloor, City Attorney PUBLISHED: April . 2006 By Summary G:\Legat Backup\ORDINANCES&RESOLUT10NS\2006-11.LundervilleSTV.032906. wpd MllI<h 30, 2006 . -2- . J - 4 180 Feel Y."icnl DiJ/um = NA VD 88 Horir.ontal Datum'" NAD BJI9 J Area ~...; up This map is 1101 ;lJIellded 10 be IIsed as a legal description. drawing;s prodJlced by the City of Port Angeles/or ils o~"" lIse and purposes. A/~ other IIse of/his map''drcnJl;ng shall not be the respo"sibilityofthe City. ~ H to H ~ ~ . . . J - 6 . . . CONDITION, FINDINGS, AND CONCLUSIONS,IN SUPPORT OF THE LUNDERVILLE STREET VACATION - STV 05-04: Condition: 1. The vacated right-of-way must be cOl.isolidated by Zoning Lot Covenant with Lot 10, Block 368 TP A prior to any development ofthesite. Findings: . 1. A petition requesting vacation ofthat portionpfthe unopened "F" Street right-of-way south of121h Street and north of Stevens School abutting Lot 1, Block 367, and Lot 10, Block 368, TP A was submitted on May 26, 2005. Abutting properties are owned by petitioners Columbia Pacific Builders and the Port Angeles School District. 2. RCW 58.17 requires the signatures of tWo thirds of abutting property owners to be considered valid when a vacation of right-of-vvay is proposed. The subj ect petition is signed by 100% of the abutting property own~s. 3. Abuttingproperties are zoned RS-7 Residential Single Family and PBP Public Buildings and Parks. The surrounding area is largely developed in single family residential structures and the Stevens Middle School site. 4. The site is designated LDR Low Density ~sidential and OS Open Space on the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. The Comprehensive Plan LandUse Map, was reviewed for consistency with the proposed :vacation of right-of-way. Land Use Map Goal, Policies, and Objective Element Goal A, Larid Use Map Goal, Policies, and Objective Goal A, and Growth Management Element Goals, Policies, and Objectives Goal A, Policy 1, and Policy 1.d were found to be most relevant to the proposal. .:.-; ", -', .,.. ... --'.- .~.'" ; The CitY of Port Angeles' Real Estate Committee met on June 13, 2005, and January 9, 2006, to consider a value for the ul!op~ne~ . right-of-way. The Real Estate Committee decided upon a value of $4.80 per sguai-e foot for the right-of-way based on an appraisal submitted by the petitioner. In discussiQp. withJhe petitioner regarding the value of the right- of-way, it was determined that only one"-half ofthe right-of-way is desired for vacation. . The remaining one-halfright-of-waywill be retained for incidental access to the Stevens School site. 5. 6. The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) review per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h).of the Washington Administrative Code. 7. The site was posted for a land use action on February 22,2006, with required publication notification appeared in the Peninsula Dailli News on February 26, 2006. 8. At its February 21,2006, regular meeting, the Port Angeles City Council established a public hearing date by resolution for action on the street vacation petition as April 18, 2006. ,', 'I. The Port Angeles Pla1ming Commission h~ld a public hearing on the proposed street vacation on March 21,2006. ' ., -- 9. J - 7 ~.'. ":.~";,,,,..,.__ 0.::."'" '.;C-:'-' ",...~..=..,._..:':.,::.'-.. ~~ ."".-..' .-:':~' -...-.-~ ,";.::',~=,. ..::::::.....,.."._"':.,::.. ,,::,:'.:' ..."""....=.,...:,.,lI.~."c..:::.".-"'-f: .: '.. '.:;""" ....-; Lundel1Jille condition, findings, and conclusions STV 05-04 Page 2 Conclusions: A. The unopened ,right-of-way serves no purpose to the current or long range transportation needs of the City. The proposed vacation will place unused property on the City's tax roles, with continue to provide pedestrian access to school property, and therefore seryes the public interest. B. As conditioned, the vacated right-of-way will be consolidated with surrounding residential property and shall be developed in a manner consistent with the RS-7 zone which is therefore in compliance with Section 17.10 (RS-7 Zone}"ofthe Port Angeles Municipal Code. C. The proposal is consistent with the goals anliJolicies of the City's Comprehensive Plan specifically, Land Use Map Goal, Policies and Objective Element Goal A. Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of April 18, 2006. ;.. .. Karen A. Rogers, Mayor . , ~: ( Becky J. Upton, City Clerk ",..; J -''''S ...._.____...... _____..__.....~...,~... ,._.,.._... ............,'..> .... ....., ., ", .... ,,~"",."'. .,,._...,,...,.,._..,..:.,,."'........... ,,,".._,,,,,,',,,'.". ...~..,.~_.. '._' ,.....,..,...", ..,.,. .....,.... .-_".".,'_.;........,.."~,,....-_...,,-r-, ''"',= .,...,.,...,.....--.~.......,----~- ---..-.__.~--_.__._... . . . . , \ '"... ~. .'.... 0'" ..R.' T.....~. .' N....G.....E.... '.L'" .E"'" '5"".' ! j i ;,)'.';, ; i'" . .'....!. !' ;;1;' i/ ~ -.- r-' .'- ~ '-' - - j '.b""_"_. -............ ............, - . WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY& ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TO: Planning Commissioners . FROM: Sue Roberds, Planning Manager DATE: March 22, 2006 RE: STY 05-04 PETITIONERS/ . OWNERS: Columbia Pacific Builders (Lunderville) and Port Angeles School District REQUEST: Vacation of City right-of-way - ''P'' Street Street south of 12th Street abutting Lot 1, Block 367 and Lot 10, Block 368 TPA . DEpARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: The Community & Economic DevelopmentDepartment recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council of street vacation petition STY 05-04 based on the condition, fmdingscand conclusions found in Attachment A to this staff report. . , BACKGROUND: . A petition requesting the vacation of City right-of-way was submitted by Mr. Tom Lunderville on behalf of Columbia Pacific Builders and the Port Angeles School District in May, 2005. The petition is valid as it has been signed by 100% of the abutting property owners. The right-of-way sought for vacation is that portion of"F" Street located immediately south of 12th Street that abuts and is directly north of the S;tevens School site. The City Council's Real Estate Corruilittee met to review the petition and set compensation for the right-of-way. In that review, it was determined that the City should retain a portion of the right-of-way as a walkway from 12th Street to the school property for pedestrian . access only. " Properties in the area are developed with single-family residences with the exception of the school property. No infrastructure exists in the right-of-way with the exception of a catch basin which must be removed and plugged or abandoned per the Public Works and Utilities Department requirements with development of the site. Additionally, sidewalk returns must be , replaced with a full sidewalk with development of the site. Sidewalk will be required with development ofthe eventual sitebecause 12th'Streetis.a school walking route. J ~ 9 ... ;.C': ""'<"'~,!, ,"~: ...."." ,,,-,,:c.~,,,,,,,,:"-:::....,,. ,"""=-:O "",:,<:<-.;:.":",,,,r..", .,~_.. ~"~~','~"""_"~' "',","'..'."".\:".-:.C' ""',C,'''' .~,.,~.-."..,.',,,,,,r..''',,~,,,,'.'''''l..;' ,.-'-';:' Economic & Community Development Department StatT Report STV 05-04 Lunderville Page 2 March 22, 2006 .:. Although the petition is signed by the Port Angeles School District, the District does not wish to obtain any of the right-of-way. Partic.ipationi~ the petition is to signify that there is no objection to the requested action. The petition is to allow the consolidation of property adjacent . to the site (east) that is owned by Columbia Pacific Development into a larger lot. DEPARTMENT REVIEW AND PUBLIC COMMENT: . The Public Works and Utilities Depmment has no objection to the proposed street vacation proposal. No utility easeme~ts,~ep;~quiredat this time. . The Fire Department has no objection to the proposed street vacation.. . The Police Department made no comment on the proposed street vacation. . The Department of Communitv & Economic 'Development: Zoning in the area is RS-7 Residential Single Family and PBP Public Buildings and Parks. Areas of potential impact ofthe proposal are summarized as follqws: Traffic Patterns: Established traffic patterns 'in the area will not be affected by the vacation as the subject right-of-way does not function as a through street nor is the right- of-way necessary to access other properties. The alley in the block is accessed from the east rather than from the subject right-of-way. Development Patterns: The proposaL;will nC?t ,adversely impact existing development in the area and will enable logical subdivision of the abutting property. . Public Health, Safety and Welfare: The vacation will not interfere with established pedestrian use ofthe right-of-way because the west one-half will remain available for public use. Therefore, the vacation will not conflict with the best interest of the pub~ic nor pose a safety issue. The right-of-way' has no value to the City as public space and returns no revenue in the form oftaxes while in public ownership. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: The site was posted and notice of the petition filing was published in the Peninsula Dailv News on February 26, 2006, regarding the proposed action. No comments have been received. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE: The subject area is designated Low DeusitY Residential (LDR) and Open Space (OS) on tbe Comprehensive Plan Land U~e Map. Surrounding properties zoned RS-7 Residential Single Family and PBP Public Buildings and Parks on the City's Zoning Map. The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed in its entirety in consideration ofthe proposed street vacation. Specific goals and policies found to be most relevant to the proposal are identified in Attachment B to this staff report. '. ," ,. .,.,(. "r" " 'j . -J - 10 . . . Economic & Community Development Department Staff Report STV 05-04 Lunderville Page 3 March 22; 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The vacating of a street is categorically. exemp(;from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) review per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h)' o{the 'Washington Administrative Code. Attachments: This action constitutes a recommendation to the City CounciL The City Council has scheduled a public hearing for consideration of the petition at its April 18, 2006, regular meeting. J "",' A - Condition, findings, and conclusions in support of street vacation B - Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Informatton . C - PetitIOn T:\STV\0504Lunderville. wpd f~; J - 11 . . . J - 12 . . . Economic & Community Development Department Staff Report STY 05-04 LunderviJIe Page 4 March 22, 2006 ATTACHMENT A Condition, Findings, and ConClusions in Support of Street Vacation Petition - STV 05-04 Condition: 1. The vacated right-of-way must be consolidated by Zoning Lot Covenant with Lot 10, Block 368 TP A prior to any development of the site. Findings: 1. A petition requesting vacation ofthatportionofthe unopened "F" Street right-of-way south of Ith Street and north of Stevens School abutting Lot 1, Block 367, and Lot 10, Block 368, TPA was submitted on May 26,2005. Abutting properties are owned by Columbia Pacific Builders and the Port Angeles School District. 2. RCW 58.17 requires the signatures of two thirds of abutting property owners to be considered valid when a vacation ofright;:.of-Way is proposed. The subject petition is signed by 100% of the abutting property owners. 3. Abutting properties are zoned RS-7 Residential Single Family and PBP Public Buildings and Parks. The surrounding area is largely developed in single family residential structures and the Stevens Middle School site. The site is designated LDR Low Den?ity Residential and OS Open Space on the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, was reviewed for consistency with the proposed vacation of right -of-way. Land Use Map Goal, Policies, and Objective Element Goal }'''' Land Use Map Goal, Policies, and Objective Goal A, and Growth Management Element Goals, Policies, and Objectives Goal A, Policy 1, and Policy 1.d were found to be most relevant to the proposal. The City of Port Angeles' Real Estate Committee met on June 13, 2005, and January 9, 2006, to consider a value for the unopened right-of-way. The Real Estate Committee decided upon a value of $4.80 per square f~'~i tfor the right-of-way based on an appraisal submitted by the petitioner. In discussion with the petitioner regarding the value ofthe right-of-way, it was determined that only one-half of the right-of-way is desired for vacation. The remaining one-half right-of-way will be retained for incidental access to the Stevens School site. 6. The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the Washington Administrative Code. 4. 5. 7. The site was posted for a land use action on February 22,2006, with required publication notification appeared in the Peninsula Dailv News on February 26, 2006. 8. At its February 21,2006, regular meeting;. the Port Angeles City Council established a public hearing date by resolution for action on the street vacation petition as April 18, 2006. The Port Angeles Planning Commission.helq. a public hearing on the proposed street ,~ . 1 . vacation on March 21,2006. . , 9. {1 - 13 """:;:"~"~"".~,:....."..,,..,~..,,.,.,;:.,....~=~,-..,..:r-M-r.",~,:.~::=:~'.." Economic & Community Development Department Staff Report STY 05-04 Lunderville Page 5 March 22, 2006 A. Conclusions: The unopened right-of-way serves no purpose to the current or long range transportation needs of the City. The proposed vacation will place unused property on the City's tax roles, with continue to provide pedestri.an.access to school property, and therefore. serves the public interest. As conditioned, the vacated right-of-way will be consolidated with surrounding residential property and shall be developed in a manner consistent with the RS-7 zone whic.h is therefore in compliance with Section 17.10 (RS-7 Zone) of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. C. The proposal is consistent with the goals and policies ofthe City's Comprehensive Plan specifically, Land Use Map Goal, Policies and Objective Element Goal A. B. ;~.,... ... J - 14 . . . lYJ.a._""AA --, ATTACHMENT B . COMPREHENSIVE pLAN and ZONll'!G ORDINANCE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Economic & Community Development Department Staff Report STY 05-04 LunderviUe Page 6 The subject site area is designated as Low Density Residential (LDR) and Open Space (OS) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed in its~ntirety in consideration of the proposed street vacation, and the following goals and policies were found to be most relevant to the proposal: . Land Use Map GoaL policies. and Objective Goal A _ To guide current and future development within the City in a manner that provides certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the challenges and opportunities of the future. Growth Mana ement Element Goals policies and Db' ectives Goal A _ To manage growth ina responsible manner that is beneficial to the community as a whole, is sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals and is consistent with the State of Washington's Growth Management Act. Policy 1- In all its actions and to the extent consistent with the provisions of this comprehensive plan, the City should strive to 'implement the following goals of the State Growth Management ACt. ,-\..... . d _ Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population, Promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing. stock. F ..', ZONING: The site and surrounding residential areas are zoned RS-7 Residential Single Family (RS. 7) on the City's Zoning Map with the exception of the Stevens School site which is zoned PBP Public Buildings and Parks. The purpose of the RS-7 Zone is: "This is a low density residential zone intended to create and preserve urban single family residential neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family homes on standard Townsite~ -.;1..... size lots, Uses which are compatible with and funCtionally related to a single family residential environment may also be located in. this zone." T: \STV\O 504 Lunderville. wpd J - 1:5 j ",-,,,,,~~,,::'"';'':':''''''' 1..,,:1' _ .0:'. ...~..,:~..,.."o,,:' =-;:.;.;,:-,-~ ",~_o :""",",."; :::::-: ,,=.:..':: ~.~'" "'',;;'i.;~~-':_O;:;I..,,~,,;I::~-~ ,- ':"''''~- ,,--~;-., ,--~~': ,",-,-,;~:~- - .. - 9t - !' . . . l .( ......./ , ~ / " 'r '!>-':"'. / ""-" " ", ........,. /.Id/ J. ,.' /~~~:><' . ,,// ~.'.;.~~,::'.::;.'.;,:,::.':",~.;,.~,.~,~>:' >- I.,:;::;..,"".......~......:.;:...... . - , ,.-.,--,,, , - . <{):i-<'.':r: '. " .,,>/ II>' /~;;!!/" ~i.~~~~ ~ /,/" , , /..,.,..n ...... "~ " . , '. ,~ ';~~:~{~~!~~2:~>"JY'l 1:\-' . ". ".". ,..",.,. . ," ~ ! ~("<:,:;:s:,/ ~t~<""<:~,> ;.~ (::;'" ~I ..................~"^<,J:-. ... /'" / /-......... ........... ..... "'\ ~.... '-:;, : / / ; ~'. ........ \. '\'.- ' ~.... "", .. / /./ '.... "" . a,. '\. ,'.,.f. " ". ,; I . ,,, '-}........ -.:. ... , '" .; ~ 'j i.... ....... /' ':'.' '.:..... . '.;../. ." / ".. ~ r-5-:;.,.."'......... ~(...; / ,. '..., . ~ .>O;:~ ...'.... ,. I . /.".; ~ -..;...~~':-;.../ /..' : .. ::.;:. . / / ... //<~~:~~{~;; "", .. '\. ;,,"J:'.......... . .:/; ,......." .~ ........, , " / ~"" :/ , ~ '--.. ../,;./ '. , ................,. " .... " , ---,:" '. \-B~" . ~~ .../ " " '" " " .......... ..{ '. ", - " , " . .......... " , , ............ .......-.... " -..'.....".. " .,.... " ". ", " " ". , / " , , " ", " .............. -'. ...'..... '.......... " " ............ " ", ............... .....~., ,/ .......... ...... ;;/ ;~... ............ ,P~,..,' ... ....." II'........ ....,...... ,~.;.J\.-:'-", ;; ..... .' '~;~:;)~;< .. i >< ~;~;:/ ',y... ;.:: ~> " ., ........... i{:~~:i~~~~~~;~ ,", ." ,.. , ~ " ".' ;;j ,/ / :""~~,r, "<.,/>~;~;;:;;. , . , .';' ., I /, -.:-:;;...... ":-:~.:,~< =~Jt . . '. .......~ ". .~~:>",/(:,!). . /ll,,'f~>0.~< ';:,:1:: " "../ I, .c:/ ,. " "" "< ", ~ .' /1 /< /:',.. itf}K?l",,, ,,)<,>.,~<~.~<~.<:~)/ ..~., ......- ", ", .................. ................ " '. '. '. ......... "".. . ........"... " " ">S" ", '. ~.. " f0;(i.~~~z~~~.. ...~..... L2't.::::~~~.~ .~. .'.;/ '.j -G::..:;J '. " .. ". ....:-....._R... ___R.. __'=. ._~.."_~_ .__ _:~":. " ' , '..><'.~.~..~::=_...::-.. ..:::__-:~. -= :- . ~ ,... , " /'\~~~:_"<~' R,.. -'---.. --- .. ~..., ~:-....~.^....... ,; ..' _.,. _..~;/ ;'~"'.........(; <Sy:.....-..... / . I . -............ , I .... /,"). (J;.~~~ ""-';t.'/ A-. ". "I;.}'.' -..::- / / ~..-. ", .../ /........... , ' //y.."";-f.,,, " ,/ : J ..~,~=:~~,,=o;,......-::-.;~..'""=.,.:=,.,=.,..:."';;.;=..::,~.";;;"'..~.,....:;'-;:::O.:;,:,.,"'=.:::-::::"".:.,-:-.;;."-."....";;",,","':::~.>:~,"',,~,,.,."'.:;;.',.;., ''''.,'';,'':O-_.,..:,,,.,"''-.~:,Ii""1'''=".-:'':.~.''','l'-.,'' .,=~""'.r-.::"."..'...='~....I'=":~.:""';.!'. ""';;:.c'"":::..:;:,,,..,=~\...-.:::,',.,,'<:.":.'n:\:"'.....,."=""-."""''''':::::::-...:~.,...,.,''=::':"=.::~..:.=-r.~'=~"...-::.:'.,..:r<.~=~.-'-.:"'.=..:--==,,:r'---:-:-..=.::.'<:,~-.=~"'=:;~"".. '/313 ;. ";"" ; ;~,/. . .1;:';"11 . ...'" ~~.. ..:.;~~-~ "..., ." / ...{ < ','. , >" ""~ ""'''~~,,/. ") iJ !~~'~~~~/\';.~.',.? . ;>~..? " :;j<(>"~. ....'................ ".,j' '" . . .. .. .. ',' ~32" .1/" I.... ,.. ......,... ...: // . ~''''.. .." ' f .'_. '....,: ~/./.;/ .... ~: '. ""'^.- .. ;.(. .13.1.1./>_>~ .'/ "'..:: ':.' r . f) . . ,.;", .:;~:7.-. X/" ,/ ..>;'.)5:.... '. -"-,', "} . " ''v_'~' ~ ......:;:.. 1.' . .; , ; . .. .,>...., / .......1' --'.... " ".... .. / "" "r.3Ji' .~ ,,/ <~/ ! .: 1:~:li .I;' '-"; ....J...,.., "\'/ '\,....,. ..f ',J.',9 '-,,- .... ! ,. :/ " ". ;>./ 1323 , . '''-.~" . '.' '. 'i '.",: ~:( "',~ --~,..., '" ....,... ""'" ,.:t ....~'...... ' ...,...,.....',../ '. '-., ..,....,.... .; j "'-" "" , ! . '" "'~ ..'....../ :':' ""'~ ~ --"../........</ . .~, "(~>. ", / / .... ..' "'......,. , I, ....". .....,.. '. " '. ".... / , ".. "-J. '.. ,. "'. " 7 ( ";; "'., / '-. .. .-' . -----... , '''''". ,I I ,_ " ~ ; -, " / ''.... / ' "j'-...., I , ,I '~~" ! ">:-::\. I 1:ff!i{!3?:;:,)~ '-......(...... '" / '~::~:~:>.... '-. /<J'V?V/4,~/~ >....~ . ~V, "~" "~ -'..... ( .J.. ".f,......,..... ."../".'.'.......".. { I ,......,,~~ I """,,<'., -...; f I I."C' Ccj' 1 ">~"" I /...... ...... ' ..;:, " ... / I <;;';''''1 L""'''"I / J', . ~;~ '- / "7 ,);;- ~I / '...,...... "', ......1 / I I. , ..~ ", '" /. f, '" ''':;". ", '-'......;, '" / -........ ""-" '... ...... i' .SI.) ~"""""""'.,.."'"<-., . "" ;\"/ ~~, I 11'1.l.::....:I.........i';..:-..,....J"'..~} ".:;:;.::, "', . ""'~,./ ,': .... "~~... ('fJ:>.., I ""':,~':>' '<::>- (: '/ ""-, ......,l , ",,~., .............,w ''-'.J '.-/ '-. ..... '. ""~. . ,'" I ...."~:::-, ....,'..;::.,..'- . /A'" .........., -"."~, ,( ..... '.....~"':-.. .".......... ,.. ". ~.....~" '''~~ Cj '-. 'I>,~ / lI.J . ~y . '"'~.... /""''I.i/ / . L'-' ,: ,..... //' .',,- ....'.....""-.. '-..." '... . .'.......... ......,." ....... "........ -....-..... .... ,l /' , / / .::'.~...,;. // :,., ;/" '~~(. /{.......... .;/ .. ':"~, .... : !Hi ''''.l ,../y.~ . ./ ..1~1?.~: >?.f/ /..~/>.. ~<. "'/,' m{ / l~.{/ // '-. \s( ()r;:- "". ! , .' :' J? '_~ . ,0' (' ./ " ....~. ". ";'-<>../ . '. ~ ~~ ", ....... "', '-<:~:.'-...,. 0",.., "-'. ..........::.".., ~/ .. I." ) . "-. / ( f I / /' " ,....,.,....."'.", .....~.. '", ~."....,,-,"-.,. / /' ." '..,,,.~'<... """"'v. .,...... ,~( ac k; ,i(" J'/ ~....,,'<.~'\ '...... I ;1 / '\....,\.....{ ........,.'v ..,.... ...., ....,..~ -". '".............. '....... ............, . :...."............. 'I...."".,.... . ..J 18 ",~"..'"'' ,,'" ...-...~..-._.~._._.-......_.. -........ .. . ..... ....-~........_- ..-.... ..-....-.. ........ . c!TY OF PORT ANGEL!ifD)TE!~~-!i~b.~ mOl I r-,. T'- -on or",..., T rl ~ TT r\ (}ru r-...._..~_.....__. r L!dJ I L:ST~~l v AcAT.lON PETI.l.J.V~-f "~AY "'" ..nn5 . i . 'VB. !. [j ,,"Uti The CityCounci[ of the City of Port Angeles, wash/.ito. - I CITY OF PORT ANGELES l Dept. of Community Development . TO: 'Come.nowthe'undersignedpetitioners and pursuantto"Chapter"3S.79 RCW respectfully show: 1. The unden;igned petitioners reqnest that the following described portion of r 5ke,{-- Street/Alley in the City of Port Angeles be vacated pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW (legaZZy describe the property requestedforvacation below). .AIII F r-#~ we-sf.cJl 8M;:' 3tf;..g {k.1u.r~ I,).A f Idle; ~ "u:Ii. t /:dL 2. Each of the undersigned petitioners is the owner of an interest in real estate abutting on the above described area. 3. -L persons own property abutting on said area. . 4. The names and addresses of property owners abutting on said areas are as follows: Name . Address if' ..d-.,6;'(Jm.j#L i\o;/k ~.fJO.tJ (f'/J n- '50 ;J"",-I4a~ uM-- Rru-ArJG..f( ~.~ Jv-/-eOl.. J!:,rsrr:.rCT #--/2/ ~rfD ~ ,. tjHI- s'""( P ,4.,.. . S. The undersigned petitioners constitute more than two thirds of the owners of said abutting property. WHEREF9RE, the petitioners ask that proceedings be commenced hereon for the vacation of said area of said i,;:L'l:IL/F . Street/Alley in the manner prescribed in Chapter 35.79 RCW. Respectfully submitted, Name Address Phone ;2.r~ E / JpL S~ 'i , ~ (1;4.. if7~,fr7r . .1!~J.j~:ft P.0.~C5;n-50 M' LfS;-:r-~g77 .... ...~_......',._.,. ~':.!J-..6tJI-:.'fJ~#:~"'".'.''_."''' ..,~~~... .....""..,....,.~,~.....r.~...',.,.~=..,.~.... "L.-.'~'. .......... ..... ........, .... ..".. ... '..' ... .. .. File No. ..J 19 . . . J - 20 . . . WASHINGTON US. A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO DATE: April 4, 2006 To: CITY COUNCIL Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities ~ fr.1.., FROM: SUBJECT: Solid Waste Rates Summary: Based on the 2004 cost of service study, rate adjustments are needed to support the increased costs of the new trans,fer station and waste export system. An adjustment to City collection rates is needed, and new rates are needed for the Transfer Station and Blue Mountain drop-box facility, which must be made in accordance with the City/County interlocal agreement. Recommendation: Following a presentation, proceed with a public hearing on the proposed rate adjustments, then a first reading of the proposed ordinances. Continue the public hearing to April 18, 2006. Backl!round / Analysis: On July 1,2006, Waste Connections will begin to provide curbside recycling, yard waste and cardboard collection services within the City. Adjustment to collection rates is proposed to complement the new recycling program and incorporate new disposal costs. Operation of the new transfer station is anticipated this fall. Based on the 2004 cost of service study, a rate adjustment is needed (see attached) to provide a smooth transition to the higher cost of the new system. It will be necessary to adjust solid waste rates at this time to maintain the fund in a financially prudent position. . As required by the interlocal agreement regarding regional solid waste export and transfer system cooperation and implementation with Clallam County, meetings were held with the Joint Solid Waste Advisory Board, Solid Waste Advisory Committee, the Utility Advisory Committee, and the Clallam County commissioners to discuss the proposed landfill, transfer station, and Blue Mountain rates. The outcome of each meeting was a favorable recommendation to City Council to proceed with a public hearing on the proposed rate adjustments. The proposed amendments to the garbage collection ordinance include a new every other week rate, a new charge for optional yard waste collection, new rates for temporary service, conditions on restricted and shared commercial refuse containers, and utility service fees for changing to and from weekly and every other week service, returning to pickup containers, additional container pickups, and resuming services after termination. . The proposed amendments to the landfill ordinance include adjustments to yard waste rates and a new allowance for the Public Works and Utilities Director to enter into special contracts prior to landfill closure. A new solid waste processing facility chapter is proposed that would establish , commercial hauler and self-hauler rates for the transfer station and the County's Blue Mountain drop- box facility. Attachments: Rate Schedule Summary and Ordinanllls - 21 N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\SoIid Waste Rates.doc Solid Waste Rates April 4, 2006 Page 2 The proposed adjustments to residential garbage collection rates (effective July 1, 2006) and commercial arba e collection rates (effective Janua 1,2007) are summarized below. Rate SChedulec~egdfate"fl~~~t~~t~9';;! A. Residential90G refuse collection monthly charge for $21.85 $27.30 weekl service ineludin curbside rec elm B. Residential 90G refuse collection monthly charge for ever other week service ineludin curbside rec clin C. Residential collection monthly charge for optional curbside ard waste service . D. Residential utilit service fee E. Commercial 90G refuse collection montWy charge including curbside cardboard recycling F. Commercial300G refuse collection monthly charge including curbside cardboard recycling- . N/A $21.85 N/A $7.05 Varies $15 $21.85 $22.95 $75.65 $79.45 The proposed rate schedule that would be in effect when the Transfer Station and Blue Mountain Drop-Box Facilit 0 en is summarized below: 1. Commercial hauler MSWI char e er ton 2. Commercial hauler WWTp1 biosolids . char e erton N/A N/A $19.85 N/A 3. Commercial hauler WWTp1 grit charge er ton N/A N/A $80.00 N/A 4. Commercial hauler yard'waste charge per 24.803 ton N/A $24.80 N/A 5. Self-hauler MSW charge per ton $84.70 $84.70 $97.00 $184.00 , ' 6. Commercial self-hauler yard waste 40.003 charge per ton 22.05 $40.00 N/A 7. Residential self-hauler yard waste charge 40.003 per ton N/A $40.00 N/A 8. Minimum charge MSW (yard waste) $8 $8 ($83) $10 ($10) $5 9. Unsecured loads $5.50 $5.50 $10.00 N/A 10. Special waste charge per ton - asbestos $209.50 $209.50 $235.70 N/A 11. Special waste charge per ton - tires $84.70 $84.70 $97.00 N/A 12. Special waste charge per ton -'white goods & metals $84.70. $84.70 $47.65 N/A 13. Special waste charfe per unit - refrigerantremova N/A N/A $20.00 N/A 14. Special waste charge per ton - ,i . contaminated or dredge soil N/A N/A $97.00 N/A 15. Moderate-risk waste - residential only N/A N/A $0.00 N/A MSW means municipal solid waste, WWTP means wastewater treatment plant. 2Rate in effect through December 31, 2006 or closurJof me l~fill, whichever occurs first. 3Proposed rate beginning July 1, 2006. "'":if; f" i . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, amending the City's solid waste utility, garbage collection, and sanitary landfill regulations and rates, Chapters 13.52, 13.54, and 13.56 ofthe Port Angeles Municipal Code, adopting a new chapter, 13.57 - Solid Waste Processing Facility, and amending utility fees, Chapter 3.70 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Chapter 13.52 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: SOLID WASTE UTILITY . Sections: 13.52.010 13.52.020 13.52.030 Creation. Director of Public Works and Utilities - Responsibilities. Acquisition ofNcGcssarj' Equipment. 13.52.010 Creation. For the purpose of carrying into effect the Solid Waste regulations of this Title, there is created and established a Solid Waste Utility within the Department of Public Works and Utilities. 13.52.020 Director of Public Works and Utilities - Responsibilities. The Director of Public Works and Utilities, hereinafter also referred to as "Director," shall have authority and responsibility to direct andfull Gharge and control of-all work provided for and contemplated by the Solid Waste regulations of this Title. The Director, with such assistance of personnel and equipment and contractual services as are furnished him by the City for the operation of the Solid Waste Utility, shall collect, remove and dispose of all garbage, rubbish, trash and offal within the City of Port Angeles as provided for in Chapter 13.54 P AMC. 13.52.030 Acquisition ofNccGssary Equipluent. The Cit, Council is authorized to, flO111 timG to till1e, acquire SUGh equipmcnt and authorize the employt11Gllt of such personnd to assist the DircGtor as in its judgment seGms necessary or advisable. All cxpcnditurGs therefor shall be flOl11 the Solid VlastG Utility Pund G1Gated undCl r AMC 3.32.010. . -1 - J - 23 Section 2. Chapter 13.54 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code, in its entirety, is . amended to read as follows: Sections. 13.54.010 13.54.020 13.54.0JO 13.54.0J5 13.54.040 13.54.045 13.54.050 13.54.0GO 13.54.0G5 13.54.070 13.54.080 lJ.54.090 13.54.100 GARnAGE COLLECTION Compliance with Chapter Required. DdtrlitiollS. Compulsory Ser v ice. Ckauup Obligation. Rates Schedule. Licn for Unpaid Garbage Collcetion Ser v iccs. Containers Uscd by City RcsidGnts Only. Container Requircments. Recycling Requirements. Unacceptable "vVastcs Dcsignated. Garbage - Draining, Wrapping and Sanitary Conditions Requircd. rrivate ColleetoIs - EquipmGut Rcgulations. AS5i5tance to Elderly and/or Handicapped. 13.54.010 COll.ipliahee with Chapter Required. It is unlawful for any per50n to bUIll, dump, collGct, remO"G or in any othcr lllanner dispoSG of garbagc, rubbish, tra5h, offal, and any . other waste upon 01 o"er any of the streets, alleys, publiG place50l private property withil1 the City othel wise than as pr 0 v ided in this Chapter. lJ.54.020 Dcfihitions. POI the pUlposes ofthi5 Chapter, the following words and plUMes havc the meanings respeGtively asGribcd to theln by this SCGtion. A. "Ashes" meahS 50lid waste products produced after the eonlbustion of coal, wood, other fuels, and othGr combustible matcrial. D. "City busincs5" l{lCanS any busincss w hosc pI incipal placc of busincss is within the City limits ofrort Angeles. C. "Cit} resident" mcans any person residing within the legal City limits of rort Angele5. D. "Collector of refu5c" means thc Solid Vv'a5te Utility within the Dcpartmc.nt of rublic \Y orks ahd ahY perSOh hay ihg a eOl1o:aGt w ttll orlicGl1sc fiorn the City for the rcruoval of rc.fusG, or any State-licensed refuse GOllcetOl opcratihg outside thc City. E. "Commer cial dwelling" means a building 01 gtOUP of buildings designGd, intehded fOl, or used fOl any purpose othcr than single or multiple dwellings, and shall include office buildihgs. AllY buildihg or group of buildihgs wherc cohibined residcnee and businGss is practiced, w helG such busincss is advcl tised by a sign of any type 011 the prelnisGs and/or is listed in the telephonG directory as a business, shall bG classificd as COIllIT1Crcial, unless spccifically exemptcd by the City Managcr or his designec, ba5ed on the 5"r v ice5 rendered. -2- . J - 24 . fi'. "Container" means a ree.cptade which is of the type approved by the. City aud furnished b~ the City for us,- with it~ llleehatllcai refuse eolketion System. The container ~hall not be kss than GO ~allom; nor mor" than JOO ~allons in capacity. The two typc's of contamers arc, loll-out (,Ontainc'rs and stationaly (,Ontainers. Roll-out (,Ontainc'Is arc, GO or 90 ~allons in capac'ity and ha'\1 c w hc'ds for case in nlO v ing thc, (,Outainc.t 5. Stational) (,Ontainer 05 al c JOO gallons in "apadty ,hId are nsed in alleys and for c'olHmordal application~., '. G. "Conttae.tOI" ill cans atlY authorizc'd person c'ontractlllg wIth or hav lllg a lIcense or pelluit to (,Ollect and dispose of refuse in the. City, or his authorizc'd agent. II. "Dange1Ous waste" lllc,ans any discarded, usckss, unwanted, or abandoned nomadioacti vC substancc's, induding but not limited to c'ertain pestiddes .or any residues 01 eontainc'rs of such suLstan"es which atc, disposed of in sue.h quantity or (,OncentIation as to pose a substantial presc'nt or potential hazard to human h"alth, wildlife, Ot thc cnvironment bc,cause such wastes 01 c'onstitucll1s 01 ('olllbinations of such ~astes, 1. have sh0I1-li'\1ed, toxic plOpe11ies that lllay cause. death, injury 01 illness OI have. mutagenic, telatogenie or caleinogenie. properties, or 2. ate. cOHosive, explosive, flammable" or may genelatc preSSUle tlllough decomposition or other mcalIS. ." . . I. "Dead animals" mearlS all animals, large 01 small, whIch may dIe or be killcd for othel than food pUlpOSOS. J. "DirectOI" means the Dilee.tor of Public 'vVOlks ror the City of Port Angeles, and his author iz"d super visors. . , .. K. "Garbage" means all putrc'scible, aniiLlal or '\1c'gctable. wastes resultmg f10m handling, preparation, cooking and c'onsumption of food in any pli'\1atc dwdling house., multiple dwelling, hotd, re.staUlant, building or institution. L. "lIealth officer" means the City or County health offic"r as dcfined by thc laws of the State. M. "Landfill" means thc Sanitary Landfill disposal ar ea as administered and regu1atcd by the City under Chapter 13.5G P AMC. " . N. "Multiple dwelling" means a building or group of bUlldl~lgS deSIgned as~ 01 intc.ndcd for or usc,d as two or m010 dwdlings, such as apaltmcnts, 100mUlg houscs, multiple hous"s or c~urts and tenant houses, pro'\1idcd such building or group of buildings aro under common O~llCiShip dnd h,l:\><:' a common Iduse disposal site, and PlOV idc.d further, that su~h group of buildings by nature of construction 01 reference i?fcr multipk~ dwelling, .except ,tOurIst courts, motds, hotds and hailer court~, or allY other estabhshnlont catcnng to hanSlcnt tGsldents, and providcd that, for thc purposc of this Chapter, three rooms shall bGequal to onc apartmcnt and any numLGr of rooruS shall be billGd to the near cst multiple. oftlllee. . O. "Offal" moans ~aste auimal matter fLOul butchGI, slaughtercI or packlllg hOU5Cs. P. "Person" means every pGrson, firm, partnorship, association, institution and corporation. ThG toru15 also 111can the OeCUpclllt or owner of the prChlisGs for which son ice is rendel cd pU1.mant to this Chaptcr. Q. "Recycling ContainGr" means a reeGptack which is ofthG t)'pe approvcd by the City al1d furnishcd by thc rccyding contractoI for thG c.ollGctio11 of rCGydabk 111atGrial5. . . - 3 - J - 25 . . . 9Z - .C' -17- '){OOM Tod dn){?Td 1 JOJ ~U!lI'JMpr\nW1?J ~I~U!S I?d JOU!1?lUO? UOIl1?~ 06 I?d l.{lUOUT J?d ~8'IZ$ ?q Il1?tIS ?sn;PJ jo UO!P'JIlo'Jr\I){'J?M JOJ 'Jll?J 'Jl.{l '900(; 'I U1?nu1?f ~U!ltU!~~(J '~U!lI?Mp r\I!UTvJ ?I~U!S I'Jd l.{1J10UT I'Jd I'JU!1?lUO? uOIlvS 06 IOd 08'O(;$?q Ilvlls ?stg?JJo TJO!P?IlO? ,(PPQM otp IOJ ~WJ ol.{.1 'V 'oItlp;nps SOl1?(I OtO't~'LI "001$ JO llmUT!U!W 1? ?q II1?l.{s mq l.{'Jns 'UO!l\?IlS!U!UTp1? PU1? dmT1?'J}? JO SlSO'J 'JIll IOJ UOSJod Ol.{l mq pUV ?snj::lJ Ol.{l dn U1?Op r\1?lU r\l!;) ~tp 'smoll (t(;) mOJ-!lU?Ml U!lH! M dn r'JUV?p 10U S! 'JSllj'JI ?tp Jl 'smol.{ t(; JO pop'Jd 1? U! p':msod'Jp OS ?stg?J l.{?ns dn U\??P 01 n1?J 01 'uoslod lpns r\q p?!dm')o 10 p;mMo 10U e\P?dOTd OlVi.\!Jd JO 'r\lT~doJd ?!Jqud nodu 'C?sn\?? I~IIlO TO '~I\?tUTU\? , ;. . . SlU~llT,)p ~T.11 q p?l!sod?p U??q S\?l.{ ?~UJ~T lPUS ll?l.{l ~U! MOIDI '~!;) ?l(l U! S?s!llT?Jd r\UV JO IOIlUO? 10 'J~r1?lp 'UO!ssossod U! UOST'Jd &:U\? IOJ ItgM1?IUU S! 1I 'uo!ll?~!IqO dnu1??I;) ~[Q.t~'LI 'OtO.t~'LI TTO!P?S U! p'Jp!^old 'Jll?T um1U!U!UI 'Jl.{111? PU1? ''J,)U'Jp!S'JT lpns Ol pOl.{spullj I'Jl\?M JOj S?~Ilnp JO lH'1111 r\l?d ~lll JOJ pOl.{SP'IUj OIl? SlZ ?TTI!l JO Sl!l1IH ?TTIl1S ?l.ll'I!lll! M PU\? IO'rlIl11l1 'JllIl1S Oll1 U! OJ! ^ I?S UO!POIlO? l.{?ns JOj &:l1d Il\?l.{S pUll 'lOl1?M JOJ p'JII!q S! O'JU'1p!S'JI l(?US 'JW!l ?UTVS ?1Il 11? 'JsnpTJO UO!P'JIIO'J 'JIll IOJ pomq oq Il1?lIS r\l!I!l0 T'11\?lA !l!;) 'IP WOTJ T~ll?M ~lT! A.P?') I (1!;) 'Jtp UIl.J1I M ?'JU';)pIS')l ,(1') ^Ll . I~ld\?II;) SIl.Jl UI P~PI ^ Old S\? ld'J?x? '(lI;) otp U!lIl! M ,\l!;) 'lIl !q P'PI A.old ?stg'J JOJ ~')! ^ T?S uO!l??IlO? V ?)}Vl 01 !JosIndUTo? S! 1I '9'J! ^ JOS {lOsIndUTO;) O[Q.t~'LI , . 'PIP pU\? 'pos 'q'JOI ,ll1~UOI 11! (,t) P?l mOl gU!p'J??x'J lO/pUl1 J?PlU\?!P U! elt) S'JIPU! lU.0] JO^O sqwH 'J'Il 10 pOOM r\U\? spq~p UOnHOTTI'Jp PU\? UO!PU IlSUO? 'SI'qy 'J!ptpur\S p'U? 's'J!lS111d 'SI\?l';>lU 'OlSlZ M pooJ s'JpuPX? "S'J1SlZ1A pwA" 'l.{l~U'JI uI et) P?J mOl PU\? I?PUTl1!p U! (ut) S'IPU! mOJ U\?tp SS?I '~u!umd pUll S?l.{'JUlZlq S\? IpM ~\? ,.,l'J 'SJ'MOg 'SSl?J~ 'SO^1?'I sopnpu! uS~lS111A pIl?A" 'J... 'S?'JulZlsqns IO/pU\? ~IlZI1?l1?W p::>pIl1'JS!p Ill? SUl?'JUT uSOlSl?Mu PU\? u01Sl?Nul 'X 'SOlIS\? sopnpu! 'T:qd\?l.{;) S!lllJo 'Jsodmd 0111 IOJ 'lP!l.{M UO!l?\?PIlud JO r\l?,)'JP 01 p?fqns 10U J'Jlll?tu 'J1SVM II\? SU\?'JUT l.{Sl?T.L 'A4 . U U ,L1.1.. 'l!Un ~u!d?'J){'J~nol.{ 'JI~U!S \? S\? ~h~!pnnq l(?ns ~u!m 'r\nUTVJ OI~U!S \? U\?l.{l I?11l0 suosI'JdJo dnoJ~ l? JO (nUTVJ oIgU!S \? 10] o')mp!S'JI 11 S\? posn 10 '10] p~pU'JlJn 10 'SlZ p'JlI~lS?P ~lnp{lt1a l? S'T\?'JTTT SUTllO M pOI~lns . ^ . .. . .. II . . II J..l. 'r\1!I!10 'l~l?lA pHOS Ol(l &:q p?T.UJoJI'Jd S??l^ J'JS OIp JOJ Ipuno;) r\l!J ~l(l &:q p'Jsodw! 'JgIl?lp l? SUV?lU u,SIl?l.{? ,')! ^ JOS UO!ll?l!U1?S" '0' 'SllO!ll?I?lI\? 10 UOIpmlsno'J lUOIJ ~U!lInsoI 'JlSl?M ~U!PI!nq 10 '1lS\?M Il?IIlSnpU! 'SI\?P'Jll?tu SnOpIl?Zl?l.{ 'S'J1Sl?M snoI,gUl?P 'SIVlU!Ul? Pl?'P 's~nInnu!T1 '~p'Jl.{ PUl?':>'JJl ''J1S\?M )[Inq 'Jpnpu! 10U S?Op n 'S~U!HU? UMl?I~U!PUpU!(rlsnpU! JO sS'Ju!snq 'owol( l? punom ?ll?Iuwu'J?1? &:nJl?U!pIO ~l?lIl SIl?! I?l1?UT OlSlZ M U'nlU!S PUl? J'1l(l1?OI 'J'Jqqn T 'IO!SP?X'J '1'00 M JO s?'J?!d II\?WS 's~u!d'J'J MS 'S~lZI Jod\?dolSl?M 'SIOH!l?lUO? pooJ 'SS\?I~ 'Ivpw ''J!lSl?Id 'pJl?oqprl?'J Ill? snvolU "lIS!qqull" . '.1 'I~lJ!\?lUO'J ?stgOJptvP'TV1S \? U! JOlllO~Ol pOIOls pU\? pO?1?Id 'UPJ?lI p'J1.IYop S\? 'I\?JJo pU\? 'lIS\?Il 'lIS!qqnI '?~\?qrl?g ml??lU ",:>stgoll" 's ,( Todl?d JOlndwo'J plU? 'J?dl?d Jo'3poI :pJ\?oqpJ\?? 'lUpds M ou lUnUT!U!W l? W) J?dl1d OUTOS PU\? '( s~" f){nW UOIll?~ puv s'Illoq l1pOS JOl!l-o ~ wnuIIu!l.U l1l\?) S?!lS\?Id 'JUTOS 'sst'l~ IIl1 'SI\?lOUT II\? s'JpuPU! "SI\?p:nt?w OI'll?P(?'J(I" .11 L'l - ~ - S - 'Iv~ OO[ 'Iv~ 06 J...LIJV JVJ 11IINIV.LNOJ . )JITITA... ClITJ SJfDIJIJ UO CIITaJ'\If1'l 'S<\AOIIOJ V,?q IIvl.{s 'Sl?U!V~110? pOU<\AO-~l!J ' oq~ '9BB\; '{ ulZnuvf ~Tnmn~';)a ~u!sn ~'Ju,;)~v IVIOPOJ V 10J osnplJo UO!POIIo'J ~nH 10] O~l?I , , 06'1 It 01'61 I SZ'[t[ ~Z'66 O~rtLZ Ot'6L ~6'~OZ ~~'6~ 0['1..0 OL'6[ ~9'89 $ ~8'6I$ 'lv~ OO[ 'IV~ 06 .A..LIJV JYJ ClITNIY .LNOJ 9 S t [ Z I )JITITA\ ClITJ SJfDIJIJ UO CIITaJ'\If1'l 'S<\AOIIOJ ~V?q IIvl.{~ ~T?U!t'lUO'J POU<\AO-r\l!J ~u!sn ,(?U?~l? IV1?P?J V TO] OSry?T JO UO!P?IIO? ?1.F ]OJ ?~Vl ?lH '~OOZ 'I [ T?qm?'JOa l.{~nonI.L 'J 06'[~t 01'10 ~Z'8L[ ~Z'60I 09'ZO[ Ot'L8 ~6'9ZZ SS'~9 O['ISI Oe[t ~9'SL $ ~8'IZ$ 'lv~ 001: 'ld 06 ]...LIJV JYJ ClITNIV.LNOJ 9 ~ t I: Z I )mITNlo. ClITJ SJf1)JJIJ UO CIITaJ'\U1N . 'S<\A.OIIOJ sv oq IIvl.{s 'Sl';)U!V1UO? P?U<\AO-r\HJ U! ~l1mO<\Ap ~I!wvJ oq~ '9BB\; '{ uvnuvf ~UTUUT~?a OI~U!~ v YO,} uVIH I?l.{lO OSry?I JO tTO!P?IIO? :nll IOJ ?lV1 , , )IITITNlo. ClITJ SJf1)IJIJ UO ClITaJ'\If1N 'S<\AOIIo] sv oq IIvl.{s 'SlOU!V~UO? POUMO-,{l!J U! ~UmOMp A:I!l~TVJ ?I~U!S v ]OJ uvql I01.FO 'JSryOI JO UO!POIIO? ?tll 10,} OlVI ol.{l 'sooz 'I I: I';)qm??'Ja q~noIl.{.L a O['Zl:t 08'tZI ~Z'09[ OO'tOI OZ'S8Z OZ'[8 SI'9lZ Ot'Z9 Ol'ttl 09'lt ~O'ZL $ 08'OZ$ 'lv~ OO[ 'lv~ 06/09 }...LIJV JVJ ClITNIV.LNOJ 9 ~ t I: Z I . :,t ,',,' ,>~:,:;'! ,,;' i ,d'.~:,; 1 $20.85 2 $ 72.10 J 41.70 144.20 . 4 G2.55 21G.JO 5 8J.40 288.40 6 104.25 J60.50 125.10 4J2.GO D. The late fol eollcction oflooselefuse ad' be $5 per Gstimated additional yard of fi . 1 Y $ r ag,e. placcd outsldG the. containe.r shall colle.ction. re tlse, ~ It 1 a 5 mllllnltlm additional chalge for e.ach E. . The rate for returning to collect a cont ' 1 containcr in the. appropriate place of 11' amer w lere thG customcr has not plae.ed the l' I co calon or w her e the cont ' bl ve HC e and where the Ctlstomer has been d' d flamer was ockcd by a parked return OCCtlrrCllce. a vIse 0 t 1e proble111 at least one.c, shall be $5 fOl each .P. The rate fm spccial rcqucsts to collcGt b Ik ' , other w l,se dGscribed in this rate scction shall be th u Y Items or pro~ Idc a Se.19 ice, not lalldfilhng costs, and labor used in the s. . 1 ; ho~r~y rate for eqUlpnlellt, matelials, e.l v lCG, ~ It:1: a 5 lllmUilUm charge. fol each occurrence. 1].54.045 Lien for U11paid Garbagc Collection Sel ices . . for gar bage collection sel ~ ices as set forth ill t1. Cl ~. Upon fatlUlc to pay the charges against the property fol which the garba c :l~l l~pter, t 1~ am,ount the.reofshall beconle a lien Stlbj~ct to foreclosure as providcd for in ~.c'v~ Jc~~~n1~ervlce 15 rendered: Sai~ lien shall be AudItor a notice ofthc Cit}'s lien spec if . th l' . 0 and .150, by filUlg wIth the County gi~ing the le.gal description ofth~ Plem~~:gso e. ~ :~rg~s, t~e period co~cred by thc charge.s, and . ug 1 0 C C 1argcd.. . . 1].54.050 C011taihers Use.d by Cit~ Re.side.nt 8 I or CIty busine.sses shall dispose. of ga b Y tIS n y. No person other than Citj' re.sidcnts own"d containGrs, r agc, ras 1, rubbish, offal, or any ot11e.r wastG, in the. City- \ I 1].54.060 Contain"l Rcquilcllle.nts. A. Requiled. It shall be the. duty of e.~e.l . . any single. dwelling, multiple dwellin or c J p.e.rson Ul ~OSSe.SSlOll, chalge or control of accumulate.d, at all tiwes to usc City 0 g, d onll~ae.lal dwellmg where. waste is cle.ated or B' . - wne eontalllelS or od t ' lIcc.tor, m accordance withthis Chapte d t d ' ' . ler con amers as appro~ed by the If 1 an 0 eposlt or eause t b d ' . such a paS011 is furnished a roll out t' 1 0 e. cposltcd refuse thelein . " - con alller t len sttd 1 II . mamtamlng the containcr in a cleal d't' ' 1 person s la bc lesponsible. for D . 1 c~n 1 1011. . Sunk~h cans ahd eontam"rs shall bc prohibitcd. C. Location. No contaillcrs shall bc ke. t d" or public all,,)' in the. City cxc"pt as oth"r wise p ,~~r, st~r.c w Ithl11 the confincs of any street II ..' rOvl e mtllsChapteI h bl k' , alC a e)ls, statIollal) containers shall be ke t' .' 1 oe s In whIch there l?cation adjacellt to such alley, pro v idcd t~t on ~Il v ate plOpe~iY Ul a con~ enient and acccssible. nghts-of-way if the Dirce.tor dcteIlllihes that s::~~n~ry contall~ers may be locat~d in City alley WhOle. therG arc 110 alleys roll-out conta' 1 11 ~ acclilent IS safe and plactIcal. In blocks , ' lllors s 1a e kcpt . t ' collcctIon, prov ided that such roll-out ct' 1 11 on p[l~a e property untll the day of on amelS s 1a be placcd so that the lid opens toward the -6- . J 28 . , d'l accessiblc location to thetravclcd road~ay collection ,d';c1o when it is dUlU~od ~d UI; lea ~I eolleotiu" >chide Gal1 leach them on th: of the sheet near the curb so that, t]:~ ~ ;~:athat such roll-out containers shall be rcmove a ro riate day and time, and pro v Ide. tlr. . , :'::11 ~ elll b "ith~, 24 hOlll s aft~1 then ~ol1octlOn~i.! Jw ell~,gs, tho stationary ovnlaUlets shall ' Por hlultipk d~c1hngs an com~e.r t as appro" cd by the. Duector for bid in a u;adily acccssible location on pn"ate prope..r y, e p ace .. I I t colkctionusing the mechamzed "ehlc e. . . d to ro ide. cenhal storage aleas thtougl~u f lobile home.. parks shall be requlIe. ,.p v 'dcd that no individual mobIle ~ . . f efu.se cOJddmClS, pro" . ., h the. mobilc home parks forthc locatIon 0 r 1 150 feet in any dircetion from hIS mobl e Olue shall be required to ~alk more t 1.111 h0111e owner .', . to dc osit or piek up his ~aste In the. ~ontaUlers, . ers such as co111pactor uhits and drop boxe.s, PD. S~eGial COnidin"'s: SuItable co~~ e;tabli'bd1Gll('" hieh di,~osc ~f refuse In may, "ith po,mi5Sio,[ fi~m the Dnectmd he ':is cir..pk,. "ould be impractical or IneffiG!e~. sueh quantity that contalllGrS, as d.,,fine ~n condition with close-fitting hds . an~ ~ a~e~tlg 1t The.sc containers shall be k~~t In go.o t thc Director may, upon notificatIOn In ~ntl1lg to . Slid tl ondltIon deteIlora G, "I constructIOn. 10U le c . 1 d 01 repaired ~ltllln 48 lOUIS. . the O~llGI, require tilc conta111er .to be.. rGp ace. D Prohibited Matenals. I d in containers. . . I. No lOeb or di,t arc to bo p.;-se 0, Inmr.ut exelGmerIt are 10 be placed !O 2 No manurc, a1lll11al dl0ppU g,. d 1 tiled by the O~l1Gr to the . bc laced inseparatccontamCIs an 1.1 containers, but such ale to p Landfill at the owncr', expehse. . b laced in Icfnse conlainers. I 3. No yard wast" IS to e p If container shall be damagGd tmoug ]: d ReplacenlGnt. any . . P Container DamagG an 1 11 ' place the same or pay for ItS repau , b by'a rGsidential 01 eommerGial user, the user s 1a re a use . lJ.54.0G5 RCGJcling RequiremG~ts. ram shall be voluntary. . I A Participation in thG recycl111g prog . d 'nto City-provided re..cycling contal11ers, D' Recyclable materials shal~ be.. deposltG 1 . . d by the Dneetor.. . . d. alcd hJ th< 01 other conta111ers as approve " laced at the locatIon and tUllG C.Slg~ , C Recycling conta111GIS shall be p . 'n' 24 hOUlS after thGU colleeh,oh. . . d fi that locatIOn ~ 1 lln TI CilJ ful collection ar"i sh.all be lemu, e lOt' C" t---pl 0' ;dcd J ecy ding cont.iners at e the propel} D AllmatGrialsdcposlted111tot 1e 1 y, atG collect carry off, or dIspose 0, .' , I' d erson shall seavGngG, separ, .' of the. City. No unaut 10UZG. p ~ritten PGrmit ofthc DucctoI.. , sneh a,atelia's unbs arrthollZeJ 00 do s~ b: II be pl""cd al the location and trme deSIgnated :' D Hard ~aste.. to be c.ollcc.tG Sla d ' o"ed yard ~aste eontall1crs or .. , I II be ~I.ce In .p~' " h f d the. City for collection. Yard ~astG Sla tin the dGfinition of"yald wastG may e IG collection e;xcept that prunings and ~lanche~rm~e ~a~te containers shall be rClllovGd from the . bundks and not placed in contall1Grs. .1 ar. At ppro"cd yard ~aste containel shall be; m . ~4 h fh" eollullOn. 1 · . , " ,<I) collection loeatioh withlll ours a t xcccding 32 gallons in volurue ~lt 1 two 15 U eithcr a standard plMtic or nlctal garbagG can, l~~/ lid with a handk. Plastic bags shall not be 'd d 'thasccure lllg hal1dlcs, 011G on caGh 51 e, an ~ 1 used as containers fol yard ~aste. . - 7 - J - 29 d helGin and as dc.5igl1~tcd . . than I(.Gyclabk maicIial, as :~:;: of nonrccyc1abk matet":: F No mat<.hal, OthCI ling cont.met.. The pre . I.: rrp eh"'-ge ..sessed to II . II b plaGed m Iecyc d . 'pocIal pIC _ by the DiiectoI ,b.. '1~1 to be !reared.. ler",e an h the abuse of 'H e.use the cont.n. . ~ II be damaged thtoug " I r eonmmet ,'a . ""corm!. f City-plodded leeye'mg t. 'Is leplacement 01 lepand G. I ~~I Ieplace the ,ame 01 pay. ~I: l11""il11l1111 of tift] pOUn , ' el the useI , . et shaH "eIg. .d d LIe u,- , E I-loaded eonla", I. II be COnst"eIe II. "" , d 'fhe folio" ing .. ..1<" '" . io~ of thc able VI ..te, Dcsi~naie . ithout tit< .peeial pet ",I" 13.54.070 Unaoeept 01 di'po,a1 al the Landfill, ."di,posal conditions. bl fi collection, fi cb'OI speCIal unacceptade '01 mOllt ofa llegoli.tOO ee art . exc", 1llion, 01 EJ" I e<.IOIll11 a pay m t s . fi 0111 the I cpa'I, . I . .t. A Dangaous n as'e-. r lat",ial, ,e,,,lllag, nd roofing n,aiellas. B' Unusual qnanb!re~ 0, ;~eh.. e.uth, plllStcI, ~~o:,~ in accordance ..ith these . b 'Idings 01 stltlC tllC , alcd fOl eOI GG cOllstltletion of tlJ. . I hich have not been plep C. Matcua s w legulations. . 1 t Dead anunalS. 'd C1 al1a111 Coun y. D. .. f gouts. e , . d E Waste ollgma'm" d'tioh' Requne . . , . . 1 ~lld Satlital) COIl 1 01 ot1.1e1 matellal . HT anl1U g u d' papel I 13.54.080 GarLase -I D;t~~~~~d of liqrtids ~d ~~~~I~ce:ahndrained garbage "hieh . All garbagG S 1a . l'he City may lert1SG A o,iled in the contamel. and iIopI opet ly plaGcd. ontain" s <h e located befoiC bcmg dep i-liquid 'We, urtw, .pped f the pl." "he, e ,efuse \ tdilion i, catl,cd i, in a It,d Ol';:'o..net 01 person ~n c':;; :o,.ditioll, eACept "heie,:~g:~~ lespomible. . . C in a clear, an san "son in chlllge " , shall maintalll the pla'l . rol which the ownel 01 p eOlle 0, .omet 'h'g , by som . t Regulatio11s. . 1 'c1e5 used fOl tL1e EQtll~men - All !lute. cnl , . bl 13 54. 090 PI i..1e Colkc~;:efu.e CoHection V ehicle:- .~. ~~closed bodie., 01 'tlll~. ~ A . Enclo.ed BodlGS 0" hiI e in the Ciry, ,h<Jl 1.' 'co >01 to e"c1ose open bo ie .' d' osal of "...Ie, '01 fa tarpaulin 01 can.. collectIo" 01 I'P . g the bodies. The liSe 0 0 al of the D II ceto,. F. the collection 0, pm. i.ion. ror e~ ~ elll: ala Y be peu~ittod upvn ~~~h:cle'. Vehicles '''"; o~f easily elcaodblc of colleclion.e lIe e . I I Garbage Colketrou. atc,tight melal bo lGS D VI atert1g 1 ste5 shall ha~ e w . 1 e 01 allY other wa di'P",al of gar"ag I dicapped, andioI constluction. . ~, llandicappcd. lfddedy, 1an1'\mlealte1native Efd I; an070r l 0 othel a~a I . . 13 54 100 Assistance to . neh of tht,i" efuse...d '" en: ~.. the Solid Waste UtilIty, d' abled, ~.i.icut, h.. c diffkolt ],~~;O~~'~~i' Chspl<I , the] m7c;~tI'~"h indi, iduals at no extI a IS .. Ih the I equll 01> . I collcetIonseI . for eomplYlllg WI '"t in plo~iding speela ngG to asSl" , which lilay ana cost - 8 - . J - 30 . Sections: . 13.54.010 13.54.020 13.54.030 13.54.035 13.54.040 13.54.050 13.54.060 13.54.070 13.54.080 13.54.090 13.54.100 13.54.110 13.54.120 13.54.130 13.54.140 13 .54.150 13.54.160 13.54.170 13.54.180 13.54.190 13.54.200 GARBAGE COLLECTION Compliance with Chapter Required. Definitions. Compulsory Service. General Provisions Applicable to All Services. Solid Waste Rates. Schedule R-Ol - Residential Weeklv Service Schedule R-02 - Residential Everv Other Week Service Schedule R-03 - Residential Yard Waste Service Schedule R-04 - Residential Temporarv Service Schedule C-Ol - Commercial 90-Gallon Service Schedule C-02 - Commercial 300-Gallon Service Schedule C-03 - Commercial300-Gallon Restricted Service Schedule C-04 - Commercial Recvcling Service Schedule C-05 - Commercial Temporary Service Lien for Unpaid Garbage Collection Services. Container Requirements. Recvcling. Yard Waste. and Cardboard Recvcling Requirements. Waste Acceptance Policv Private Collectors - Equipment Regulations. Assistance to Elderlv and/or Handicapped. Penalties. 13.54.010 - Compliance with Chapter Required. It is unlawful for any person to burn. dump. collect, remove or in any other manner dispose of garbage. rubbish. trash. offaL and any other waste upon. over. or within the City otherwise than as provided in this Chapter. 13.54.020 - Definitions. The definitions set forth in PAMC 13.57.020. excluding recyclable materials and yard waste. are hereby adopted by this reference for the purpose of this Chapter. In addition. as used in this Chapter. the following terms have the following meanings: A. "Cardboard recycling container" means a receptacle that is of the type approved bv the Director and furnished by the recycling contractor for the collection of Old Corrugated Cardboard at commercial dwellings. B. "City business"means any business whose principal place of business is within the City limits of Port Angeles. C. "City resident" means any person residing within the City limits of Port Angeles. D. "Collect" and "Collection" mean the curbside pickup of a refuse container. a recycling container. yard waste container. or cardboard recycling container by a contractor or by the City. E. "Commercial Building" means a building or grOUP of buildings designed. intended for. or used for any purpose other than dwellings. and shall include office buildings. Anv building or group of buildings where combined residence and business is practiced. where such . - 9..; J - 31 "- business is advertised bv a sign of any type on the premises or is listed in the telephone directory as a business, shall be classified as commercial. unless specifically exempted by the Director or his designee, based on the services rendered. F. "Contractor" means anv authorized person contracting with the City or having a license, franchise, or permit issued by the City to collect and dispose of wastes in the City, or his authorized agent. G. "Dangerous waste" means any discarded, useless, unwanted, or abandoned nonradioactive substances, including but not limited to pesticides or any residues or containers of such substances that are disposed of in such Quantity or concentration as to pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health, wildlife, or the environment because such wastes or constituents or combinations of such wastes: 1. have toxic properties that may cause death, iniury or illness or have mutagenic, teratogenic or carcinogenic properties: or 2. are corrosive, explosive, flammable, or may generate pressure through decomposition or other means. H. "Director" means the Director of Public Works and Utilities for the City of Port Angeles. 1 "Garbage" means all putrescible animal or vegetable wastes resulting from handling, preparation, cooking and consumption of food in any private dwelling house, multiple dwelling, hotel. restaurant. building or institution. 1. "Landfill" means the Sanitary Landfill disposal area administered and regulated by the City under Chapter 13.56 PAMC. K. "Multiple dwelling" means a building or grOUP of buildings designed as, or intended for, or used as two or more dwellings, such as apartments, rooming houses, multiple houses or courts and tenant houses: provided such building or group of buildings are under common ownership and have a common refuse disposal site: and provided further, that such group of buildings by nature of construction or reference infer multiplex dwelling, except tourist courts, motels, hotels and trailer courts, or any other establishment catering to transient residents: ' and provided that. for the purpose of this Chapter, three rooms shall be equal to one apartment and any number of rooms shall be billed to the nearest multiple of three. L. "Offal" means waste animal matter from butcher, slaughterer or packing houses. M. "Old corrugated cardboard or O.C.C." shall have the same meaning as corrugated cardboard within the service agreement as modified or amended and shall be further defined as two strips of flat cardboard on the top and bottom, and a corrugated or fluted strip running through the center, commonly found in boxes used for packaging and shipping. Waxed boxes and gray cardboard (such as cereal boxes, shoeboxes and paper tubes) are not old corrugated cardboard. N. "Overloaded container" means a refuse container that weighs more than the lifting capacity of the City's mechanized refuse collection system or a refuse container with a lid that does not completely close due to the amount of refuse placed within the container. O. "Person" means every person, firm, partnership, association, institution and corporation. The terms also mean the occupant or owner of the premises for which service is rendered pursuant to this Chapter. - 10 - J - 32 . . . . P. "Recycling container" means a receptacle. which is of the type approved by the City and furnished by the recycliiili contractoffdr the collection of recyclable materials. ~ "Recyclable materials" shall havethe same meaning as recyclable materials for curbside collection in accordance within the service agreement as modified or amended. R. "Refuse" means garbage. rubbish. trash. and offal. as defined herein. placed and stored together in a refuse container. S. "Refuse container" means a receptacle. which is of the type approyed by the City and furnished by the City for use with its mechanical refuse collection system. T. "Residence" means a single dwelling unit that has been issued a certificate of occupancy. U. "Restricted refuse container" means a 300-gallon refuse container that the Director does not allow to be filled by more than two-thirds due to the volume and/or weight ofthe waste. V. "Rubbish" means all cardboard. plastic. metal. glass. food containers. wastepaper. rags. sweepings. small pieces of wood. rubber. leather and similar waste materials that ordinarily accumulate around a home. business or industry. Rubbish does not include bulk waste. lawn cuttings. tree and hedge trimmings. dangerous wastes. hazardous materials. industrial waste or building waste resulting from construction or alterations. W. "Single dwelling" means a building designed as. or intended for. or used as. a residence for a single family or a group of persons other than a single family. using such building as a single housekeeping unit. X. "Transfer station" shall have the meaning as set forth. administered and regulated by the City under Chapter 13.57 P AMC and the service agreement as modified or amended. Y. "Trash" means all waste matter not subiect to decay or putrefaction. which. for the purpose of this Chapter. includes ashes. Z. "Waste" and "wastes" means all discarded materials and/or substances. AA. "Yard waste" shall have the same meaning as yard waste or yard debris for curbside collection in accordance within the service agreement as modified or amended. BB. "Yard waste container" means a receptacle. which is of the type approved by the Director and furnished by the contractor for the collection of yard waste. . 13.54.030 - Compulsorv Service. Each dwelling and commercial building within the City shall be provided with refuse collection service by the City. Each dwelling and commercial building within the City shall be billed for the collection of refuse at the rates provided in Section 13.54.040. If City residential water service is provided. collectione service shall also be provided. If City residential water service is terminated. collection service may also be terminated. The recycling service. yard waste service. and cardboard recycling service are not compulsorv services. When approved by the Director. commercial buildings may obtain private collection services or self-haul their wastes if their waste volume and/or weight exceeds the capacity of the City's mechanized refuse collection system. 13.54.035 - General Provisions Applicable to All Services. A. Collection service shall not be provided by the City for refuse placed outside of a refuse container or for overloaded containers. . - 11 - J - 33 B. A utility service fee. inaccordancewithPAMC 3.70.01O.B.3 for each occurrence. shall be charged when a vehicle must return to collect a refuse container where: the person has . not placed the container in the appropriate place of collection: the person has not set out the container in accordance with the scheduled date and time: the person set out an overloaded container: or where the container was blocked by a parked vehicle: provided. no fee shall be assessed until 'the responsible person is notified that a fee will be charged in such instances.. C. It is unlawful for any person in possession. charge or control of any premises in the City. knowing that refuse has been deposited on the premises by the elements. animals. or other causes. to fail to clean UP such refuse so deposited in a period of 24 hours. If the refuse is not cleaned UP within twenty-four (24) hours. the City may clean UP the refuse and assess the erson for the costs of cleanu and administration. Such bill shall be a minimum of 100. D. It is unlawful for any person to deposit garbage. trash. rubbish. offal. recyclable materials. yard waste. or any other waste. in any refuse container other than the refuse container assigned to that person by the City. No containers are allowed to be shared except as approved by the Director. 13.54.040 - Solid Waste Rates. The rates for solid waste services shall be in accordance with Sections 13 .54.050 through 13.54.130. The rates for solid waste services in Schedules R-O 1 through R -04 and C-O 1 through C-O 5 shall apply to each person that receives so lid waste services. 13.54.050 - Schedule R-Ol - Residential Weekly Service. A. Through June 30. 2006. the rate shall be $21.85 per month for 1 collection of a 90- gallon refuse container per week. The rate per month for each additional refuse container shall be $21.85. B. Beginning July 1.2006. the rate shall be $27.30 per month for 1 collection of a 90- gallon refuse container per week and 1 collection of a 96-gallon recycling container every other week. The rate per month for each additional refuse container shall be $27.30. Upon request. a refuse container collection in addition to the weekl collection ma be made and a utili service fee shall be charged per occurrence in accordance withPAMC 3.70.010.B.3. Ifa person does not request everv other week service on or before June 16. 2006 in accordance with PAMC 13.54.060.A. the rate specified within this Section shall automatically apply beginning July L 2006. . C. Beginning October L 2006. a utility service fee in accordance with P AMC 3.70.010.B.4 shall be charged per container each time the same person at the same service location (1) changes from Schedule R-Ol- Residential Weekly Service to Schedule R-02 - Residential Eve Other Week Service or 2 re uests a rec clin container where the rec clin service has been voluntarily discontinued or terminated in accordance with 13.54.160.H. 13.54.060 - Schedule R-02 - Residential Every Other Week Service. A. Beginning July L 2006. upon request the rate shall be $21.85 per month for 1 collection of a 90-gallon refuse container and a 96-gallon recycling container every other week. The rate per month for each additional refuse container shall be $21.85. B. Beginning July 1.2006. a refuse container set out in accordance with the scheduled date and time for weekly service shall not be collected. Upon request. a refuse container - 12 - . J - 34 . collection in addition to theeverv other week collection mav be made and a utili tv service fee shall be charged oer occurrence in accordance with PAMC 3.70.01O.B.3. C. Beginning October 1. 2006. a utility service fee in accordance with P AMC 3.70.01O.B.4 shall be charged oer container each time the same oerson at the same service location (1) changes from Schedule R-02- Residential Everv Other Week Service to Schedule R-Ol- Residential Weeklv Service. or (2) requests a recvcling container where the recvcling service has been voluntarilv discontinued or terminated in accordance with 13.54.160.H. 13.54.070 - Schedule R-03 - Residential Yard Waste Service. A. Beginning July 1. 2006. uoon request the rate shall be $7.05 oer month oer 96- gallon vard waste container for 1 collection ofvard waste everv other week during the months of March through November and once oer month during the months of December through Februarv. The rate oer month for each additional yard waste container shall be $7.05. B. Beginning October 1. 2006. a utility service fee in accordance with P AMC 3.70.01O.B.4 shall be charged oer container each time the same oerson at the same service location requests a yard waste container where the yard waste service has been terminated. . 13.54.080 - Schedule R-04 - Residential Temoorarv Service. Beginning July 1. 2006. uoon request a 90-gallon or 300-gallon temoorarv refuse container is available and the utility service fee to deliver each container shall be in accordance with PAMC 3.70.01O.B.4. The utility service fee for each collection of a 90-gallon refuse container shall be one-fourth of the rate soecified in 13.54.090 P AMC. The utility service fee for each collection of a 300-gallon refuse container shall one-fourth ofthe rate soecified in 13.54.100 P AMC. Requests to deliver. remove and collect a temoorarv refuse container shall be made at least 24 hours in advance. 13.54.090 - Schedule C-Ol - Commercial 90-gallon Service. A. Through December 31. 2006. the rate shall be $21.85 oer month for 1 collection of a 90-gallon refuse container oer week and semi-weekly collection of a cardboard recycling container. The rate oer month for. each additional refuse container and each additional weekly collectionofa refuse container shall be $21.85. The rate shall be reduced by4.6% for the federal goyernment. its agencies and instrumentalities. B. Beginning Januarv 1. 2007. the rate shall be $22.95 oer month for 1 collection of a 90-gallon refuse container oer week and semi-weekly collection of a cardboard recycling container. The rate oer month for each additional refuse container and each additional weekly collection of a refuse container shall be $22.95. The rate shall be reduced by 4.6% for the federal government. its agencies and instrumentalities. ' . 13.54.100 - Schedule C-02 - Commercial 300-Gallon Service. A. Through December 31. 2006. the rate shall be $75.65 oer month for 1 collection of a 300-gallon refuse container oer week and semi-weekly collection of a cardboard recycling container. The rate oer month for each additional refuse container and each additional weekly collection of a refuse container shall be $75.65. The rate shall be reduced by 4.6% for the federal government. its agencies and instrumentalities. - 13 - J - 35 8. Beginning January L 2007. the rate per person shall be $79.45 per month for 1 collection of a 300-gallon refuse container per week and semi-weekly collection of a cardboard recycling container. The rate per month for each additional refuse container and each additional weekly collection ofa refuse container shall be $79.45. The rate shall be reduced by4.6% for the federal government. its agencies and instrumentalities. C. Where approved by the Director. a 300-gallon refuse container may be shared by UP to 5 persons. The Director shall determine the rate charged to each person that shares the use of a 300-gallon refuse container. The rate shall be based on each commercial building's waste volume and/or weight and Schedule C-02 - Commercial 300-Gallon Service. Under no circumstances shall the rate for any person that shares a 300-gallon refuse container be less than Schedule C-O 1 - Commercial 90-Gallon Service. 13.54.110 - Schedule C-03 - Commercial 300-Gallon Restricted Service. A. Through December 31. 2006. the rate per person for a restricted refuse container shall be two-thirds of the rate specified in 13.54.100.A. P AMC per month for 1 collection of a 300-gallon refuse container per week and semi-weekly collection of a cardboard recycling container. The rate per month for each additional refuse container and each additional weekly collection of a refuse container shall be two-thirds of the rate specified in 13 .54.1 OO.A. P AMC. The rate shall be reduced by 4.6% for the federal government. its agencies and instrumentalities. B. Beginning Januarv L 2007. the rate per person for a restricted refuse container shall be two-thirds of the rate specified in 13.54.100.8. P AMC per month for 1 collection of a 300-gallon refuse container per week and semi-weeklv collection of a. cardboard recycling container. The rate per month for each additional restricted refuse container and each additional weekly collection of a restricted refuse container shall be two-thirds of the rate specified in 13.54.100.8. PAMC. The rate shall be reduced by4.6% for the federal government. its agencies and instrumentalities. 13.54.120 - Schedule C-04 - Commercial Recycling Service. Beginning July 1. 2006. upon request the rate shall be $10.50 per month for 1 collection of a recycling container per week for each location within the City limits of Port Angeles. in addition to semi-weekly collection of cardboard. The rate per month for each additional recycling container and each additional weeklv collection of a recycling container shall be $10.50. 13.54.130 - Schedule C-05 - Commercial Temporary Service. Beginning July L 2006. upon request a 90-gallon or 300-gallon temporary refuse container is available and the utility service fee to deliver each container shall be in accordance with PAMC 3.70.010.8.4. The utility service fee for each collection of a 90-gallon refuse container shall be one-fourth ofthe rate specified in 13.54.090 P AMC. The utility service fee for each collection of a 300-gallon refuse container shall one-fourth ofthe rate specified in 13.54.095 P AMC. Requests to deliver. remove and collect a temporary refuse container shall be made at least 24 hours in advance. 13 .54.140 - Lien for Unpaid Garbage Collection Services. Upon failure to pav the charges for garbage. recycling and yard waste collection services as set forth in this Chapter. the - 14- J - 36 . . . . amount thereof shall become a lien against the property for which the garbage collection service is rendered. Said lien shall be su1:Hectto foreclosure as provided for in RCW 35.21.140 and .150. bv filing with the County Auditor a notice of the City's lien. specifying the charges. the period covered bv th~ charges. and giving the legal description of the premises sought to be charged. . 13.54.150 - Container Requirements. A. It shall be the duty of every person in possession. charge or control of any single dwelling. multiple dwelling. or commercial building where waste is created or accumulated. at all times to use City-owned refuse containers. or other containers as approved by the Director. in accordance with this Chapter and to deposit or cause to be deposited refuse therein. Single dwellings and multiple dwellings. furnished roll-out refuse containers shall be responsible for maintaining their assigned refuse container in a clean condition. B. In the event a person has been advised of an overloaded container at least twice. the Director may require additional refuse containers and/or more frequent collections. C. No refuse. yard waste. recycling. or cardboard recycling containers shall be kept or stored within the confines of any street or public alley in the City. except as otherwise provided in this Chapter. In blocks in which there are alleys. stationary containers shall be kept on private property in a convenient and accessible location adiacent to such allev: provided that stationary refuse containers may be located in City allev rights-of-wav if the Director determines that such placement is safe and practical. In blocks where there are no alleys. roll-out containers shall be kept on private property until the dav of collection: provided that such roll-out containers shall be placed so that the lid opens toward the collection vehicle when it is dumped and-in a readilv accessible location to the traveled roadway of the street near the curb so that the automated collection vehicle can reach them on the appropriate dav and time: and provided further that such roll-out containers shall be removed from the curb or allev within 24 hours after their collection. For multiple dwellings and commercial buildings. the stationary refuse and cardboard recvcling container shall be placed in a readilv accessible location on private property. as approved bv the Director for collection using the mechanized vehicle. Mobile home parks shall be required to provide central storage areas throughout .the mobile home parks for the location of refuse containers: provided that no individual mobile home owner shall be required to walk more than 150 feet in anv direction from his mobile home to deposit or pick up his waste in the refuse containers. D. Special Containers. Suitable containers. such as compactor units and drop boxes. mav. with permission from the Director. be used bv establishments which dispose of refuse in such quantity that containers. as defined in this Chapter. would be impractical or inefficient. These containers shall be kept in good condition with close-fitting lids and watertight construction. Should the condition deteriorate. the Director mav. upon notification in writing to the owner. require the container to be replaced or repaired within 48 hours. E. Prohibited Materials. 1. No rocks. concrete. or dirt may be placed in a refuse. yard waste. recvcling or cardboard recvcling container. 2. No manure or human excrement mav be placed in a refuse. vard waste. recvcling or cardboard recvcling container. 3. No yard waste. dangerous waste. or unacceptable waste mav be placed in . - 15 - J - 37 a refuse container. Refuse containers with yard waste, dangerous waste, or unacceptable waste shall not be collected. F. Container Damage and Replacement. If any refuse container is damaged through abuse by a person, or is stolen due to negligence by a person, the person shall replace the same or pay for its repair. , G. All garbage shall be drained ofliquids and placed in a paper or pl~stic bag and tied closed before being deposited in a refuse container. All animal waste, ashes, and cat box filler shall be placed in a paper or plastic bag and tied closed before being deposited in a refuse container. The City may refuse to collect a refuse container with animal waste, ashes, cat box filler, and undrained garbage, which is not in a bag and tied closed. H. The owner or person in charge of the place where refuse containers are located shall maintain the place in a clean and sanitary condition, except where such condition is caused by someone or something for which the owner or person in charge is not legally responsible. 13.54.160 - Recycling, Yard Waste, and Cardboard Recycling Requirements. A. Single dwellings and multiple dwellings up to 4 units may receive the residential recycling service and residential yard waste service. Commercial buildings may receive the commercial cardboard recycling service. The Port Angeles School District may participate in the commercial recycling service for their facilities located within the City limits of Port Angeles. B. Persons participating in the residential recycling service shall deposit all recyclable materials into contractor-provided recycling containers in lieu of depositing recyclable materials into City-provided refuse containers. Green, brown and clear recyclable glass bottles and iars shall not be deposited into a recycling container and may be deposited into a recycling drop-off facility as provided for in Chapter 13.57 PAMC. Persons participating in the commercial ( cardboard recycling service shall deposit all old corrugated cardboard into contractor-provided cardboard recycling containers in lieu of depositing old corrugated cardboard into City-provided refuse containers. C. Recycling containers shall be placed at the location and time designated by the City for collection and shall be removed from that location within 24 hours after their collection. D. All recyclable materials deposited into a contractor-provided recycling container or cardboard recycling container are the property of the contractor. No unauthorized person shall scavenge, separate, collect. carry off, or dispose of, such materials unless authorized to do so by written permit of the Director. Beginning July L 2006, recyclable materials placed outside the recycling container shall not be collected. E. Yard waste containers shall be placed at the location and time designated by the City for collection and shall be removed from that location within 24 hours after their collection. The yard waste service excludes the collection of food waste, metals, plastics, and synthetic fibers, construction and demolition debris, stumps, rocks, concrete, sod, dirt, and any wood, trees or tree limbs over four inches (4") in diameter and/or exceeding four feet (4') in length. Plastic bags shall not be used or deposited into yard waste containers. Beginning July 1,2006, excluding trees from the December holidays placed outside the yard waste container during the month of January, yard waste placed outside the yard waste container shall not be collected. F. A person that has been advised by the City on two or more occasions of the presence of wastes within a recycling container that are not recyclable materials will have the - 16 - J - 38 . . . I', " - f:-;--- . curbside recycling service terminated and the contractor may retrieve the recycling container. G. A person that has'tJeen advised by the City on two or more occasions of the presence of wastes within a yard waste container that are not yard waste will have the yard waste service terminated and the contractor may retrieve the yard waste container. H. A person will have the curbside recycling service terminated and the contractor may retrieve the recycling container after the Director has notified a person by regular mail that they have not set out a recycling container for two or more consecutive months during a six month period. and a recycling container is not set out by a person for pick UP for two or more consecutive months during the subsequent six month period. 1 A person that has been advised by the City on two or more occasions of the presence of wastes within a cardboard recycling container that are not old corrugated cardboard will have the curbside cardboard recycling service terminated and the contractor may retrieve the cardboard recycling container. 13.54.170 - Waste Acceptance Policy. Any dangerous waste or unacceptable waste included in the waste acceptance policy for the solid waste processing facility shall be unacceptable for refuse collection. . 13.54.180'." Private Collectors - Regulations. ^' Private collectors offering service to commercial buildings within the City must possess a G-permit from the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission and be authorized to collect and transport acceptable waste in Clallam County or within the City of Port Angeles B. All private vehicles used for the collection or disposal of waste. for hire in the City. shall have enclosed bodies. or suitable provisions for covering the bodies. The use of a taroaulin or canvas cover to enclose open bodies of collection vehicles may be permitted upon approval of the Director. C. Vehicles used for the collection or disposal of garbage or any other wastes shall have watertight metal bodies of easily cleanable construction. , I I 13.54.190 - Assistance to Elderly and/or Handicapped. If elderly. handicapped. and/or disabled residents have difficulty disposing of their refuse. recyclable materials. or yard waste. or access to containers by collection vehicle is not possible. and there are no other available alternative for complying with the requirements ofthis Chapter. they may notify the Solid Waste Utility. which may arrange to assist in providing special collection service to such individuals at no extra cost. Such assistance may include the use of special containers as approved by the Director. . 13.54.200 - Penalties. A. Any person subiect to this Chapter who deposits dangerous waste or unacceptable waste into a refuse container. recycling container. yard waste container. or cardboard recycling container shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. and. upon conviction thereof. shall be punished by a fine not less than $250 per violation. Each day that a violation continues constitutes a separate offense. - 17 - J - 39 B. Any person subiect to this Chapter who fails or refuses to comply with the waste acceptance policy. knowingly deposits waste that is not a recyclable material into a recycling . container. or knowingly deposits waste that is not a yard waste into a yard waste container. shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. and. upon conviction thereof. shall be punished by a fine not less than $250 per violation. Section 3. read as follows: Sections: 13.56.010 13.56.020 13.56.030 13.56.040 13.56.043 13.56.045 13.56.047 13.56.050 13.56.060 Chapter 13.56 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code is hereby amended to SANITARY LANDFILL Definitions. Rates. Rate - Special Items. Rate - Certain Charitable or City-Sponsored Organizations. Governmental Solid Waste Utility Rate. Commercial Compacted Rate. Large Volume Demolition Debris Rate. Junked or Wrecked Automotive Vehicles Prohibited. Landfill Disposal Area Regulations. . 13.56.010 Definitions. The definitions set forth in P AMC 13.54.020 are hereby adopted by this reference for the purpose of this Chapter. In addition, as used in this Chapter, the following terms have the following meanings: A. "Commercial user" means any person hauling refuse from, or as a result of, any business, commercial or industrial enterprise, regardless of where said enterprise is located. B. "Non-City user" means any user ofthe Sanitary Landfill site who resides out'side of the City limits and/or who hauls refuse that is generated outside the City limits. C. "Covered load" means that material to be deposited in the Sanitary Landfill that is contained or restrained, such that the material cannot fall, slip or otherwise escape from the vehicle in which it is transported to the Sanitary Landfill, and thereby be deposited onto a roadway or property adjacent to the roadway. 13.56.020 Rates. The following landfill rates shall be in effect until the Director provides written notice to the public in accordance with 13.57.020 P AMC that the solid waste processing facility rates will be in effect: A. All Landfill users shall be charged and shall pay the following rates for dumping refuse at the Sanitary Landfill site (except as set forth herein): Rate Through December 31,2005, $80.65 per ton with a $7.50 minimum charge.. Beginning January 1, 2006, $84.70 per ton with a $8.00 minimum charge. - 18 - . J - 40 . B. In addition to the fees established by subsection A of this Section, through December 31, 2005, uncovered loads shall be charged an additional $5.25 fee. Beginning January 1,2006, uncovered loads shall be charged an additional $5.50 fee. C. Refuse requiring special handling, including but not limited to asbestos and low level radioactive materials, shall be charged $199.50 per ton; provided that the minimum charge for refuse requiring special handling shall be $199.50 through December 31, 2005. Beginning January 1,2006, refuse requiring special handling, including but not limited to asbestos and low level radioactive materials, shall be charged $209.50 per ton; provided that the minimum charge for refuse requiring special handling shall be $209.50. Special handling includes manifesting, immediate burial, hand unloading and/or placement in the disposal pit by Landfill crews. D. Landfill users' dcan yaid wastc, as d~termincd by thc Landfill attendant, that may be converted to compost will not be charged a fee except that cOlllmercial USGlS, induding but not limited to landscape SGr vices, lawn maintenancc SOl vicGs, and trcc pIuninWIcmoval seI v iccs, shall be charged $21.00 pGI ton through DccGmbGI J 1,2005. Dcginning January 1, 200G GOllllllGIGial tl5GIS shall bG chalgGd $22.05 pC.I ton. Beginning July 1. 2006. landfill users' clean yard waste. as determined by the Landfill attendant. that may be converted to compost will be charged $40.00 per ton with a $8.00 minimum charge. Prior to July 1. 2006. commercial users. including but not limited to landscape services. lawn maintenance services. and tree pruning/removal services. shall be charged $22.05 per ton. E. The Director may waive the Landfill fee for disposal of refuse and litter which is collected and disposed of as a part of a City-sponsored beautification or cleanup program. F. Recyclable materials being recycled at the Landfill will not be charged a fee. G. The landfill tonnage rate shall be reduced by 4.6% for the federal government, its agencies and instrumentalities shall be $76.95. All refuse service contracts for such shall be exempt under WAC 458-20-250 from payment ofthe 4.6%solid waste collection tax. Beginning January 1,2006, the landfill tonnage rate for the federal government shall be $80.80. H. Prior to landfill closure. the Director shall have authority to enter into contracts with rates other than specified in this Chapter. provided that such rates recover the cost of providing the service. and provided that the City Manager~ Mayor and Council members of the Utility AdvisorvCommittee are notified. and provided that such contracts have a term of no more than ninety (90) days before formal adoption by the City Council. . 13.56.030 Rate - Special Items. Through December 31,2005, all users of the Sanitary Landfill site shall be charged and shall pay the following rates for dumping the following certain types of refuse: Item Tires (automobile and truck) Appliances Rate $80.65/ton 80.65/ton. Beginning January 1,2006, all users ofthe Sanitary Landfill site shall be charged and shall pay the following rates for dumping the following certain types of refuse: . - 19 - J - 41 Item Tires (automobile and truck) Appliances Rate $84.70/ton 84.70/ton. . 13.56.040 Rate - Certain Charitable or City-Sponsored Organizations. A fifty percent reduction in the landfill rates as set forth in this Chapter will be made available to certain charitable, nonprofit organizations and to certain City-sponsored projects by non-profit organizations, provided that the following requirements are met: A. The reduction will only be given upon completion by the organization of a written application and acceptance of said application by the City. B. The reduction may be applied to those charitable, nonprofit organizations, such as the Salvation Army, St. Vincent DePaul, and Serenity House, the primary purpose of which is provide necessary support for the poor or infirm and which must dispose of unusable donated items. C. Pursuant to Chapter 35.83 RCW, the reduction may be applied to the Housing Authority of Clallam County for self.,.haul of materials left by tenants who vacate Housing Authority premises and for disposal of demolitioh debr is fr 0111 the. lIousing Author ity' s Lee lIotd Projeet. D. The reduction may be applied to City-sponsored projects by non-profit organizations, provided that such sponsorship has been authorized by the City Council and furthers the public health, safety, or welfare, enhances the environment, or is otherwise in the public interest. 13.56.043 Governmental Solid Waste Utility Rate. Landfill disposal by other . governmentally owned solid waste utilities shall be at the rate established by interlocal agreement between the City and such other governmentally owned solid waste utility. Beginning Julv 1. 2006. clean vard waste disposal by a governmentally owned solid waste utility; as determined by the landfill attendant. that may be converted to compost shall be charged $24.80 per ton. 13.56.045 Commercial Compacted Rate. All commercial haulers of over two thousand tons per year of compacted refuse to the sanitary landfill shall be charged the rates as set forth in P AMC 13.56.020, except that a special rate may be charged pursuant to a separate agreement between the City and the commercial hauler based on such factors as reduced landfill services being utilized by the commercial hauler. 13.56.047 Large Volume Demolition Debris Rate Landfill disposal of demolition debris in the amount of at least 5,000 tons, as guaranteed pursuant to separate agreeme~t with the City, shall be at the rate of $40 per ton. 13.56.050 Junked or Wrecked Automotive Vehicles Prohibited. The dumping or placement of junked or wrecked automotive vehicles at the Sanitary Landfill site is prohibited. - 20- . J - 42 i"<>'.:in . 13.56.060 Landfill Disposal Area Regulations. A. Use Generally. Tlie City Sanitary Landfill disposal area shall be open at such times designated by the Director. Those persons hauling their own refuse to the disposal site shall place such refuse where directed by the operator of the disposal area and shall pay those fees as set forth by the City Council. B. Origin of Refuse. Acceptable refuse originating within the City limits and transported to the Sanitary Landfill by any person shall be accepted for disposal during the designated hours of operation. All persons offering such acceptable refuse may be required to submit proof of origin ofthe material in the form of a certificate certifying ownership and that the material originated within the City. U'S, ofth, Sanitary Landfillsiteby pcrsonsli v ing ohtside the City linlits shall be upon the basis of a special ser v ice charge set by the City Council. Waste originating outside Clallam County shall be unacceptable for disposal at the Sanitary Landfill except as other w iSG pro~ idcd in r AMC lJ.54.070with the orior written consent of the Director. C. Burning. It is unlawful for any unauthorized person to set fire to, or bum, any waste in the Landfill grounds used by the City unless granted permission by the Director to do so. D. Scavenging. All materials delivered to and disposed of at the Landfill are the property of the City. No unauthorized person shall scavenge, separate, collect, carry off, or dispose of, such material unless authorized to do so by ~ritten permit of the Director. E. Unlawful Entry. It is unlawful for any person to enter the Landfill area except when an attendant is present during the designated hours of operation. F. Yard waste. Yard waste may be accepted at the landfill co-composting facility, but it shall be free of contaminants, including but not limited to, plastic bags, refuse, rocks, sod, dirt, and construction and demolition debris. . Section 4. A new chapter, 13.57 - Solid Waste Processing Facility, of the Port Angeles Municipal Code is hereby created to read as follows: SOLID WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY Sections: 13.57.010 13.57.020 13.57.030 13.57.040 Definitions. Rates. Disoosal Regulations. Penalties. . 13.57.010 Definitions. The definitions set forth in PAMC 13.54.020. excluding recyclable materials and yard waste. are hereby adooted by this reference for the ouroose ofthis Chaoter. In addition. as used in 'this Chaoter. the following terms' have the following meanings: A. "Acceotable household hazardous waste" shall have the same meaning as acceotable household hazardous waste within the service agreement as modified or amended. B. "Acceotable moderate-risk waste" shall have the same meaning as acceotable moderate-risk waste within the service agreement as modified or amended. - 21 - J - 43 C. "Acceptable special waste" shall have the same meaning as acceptable special waste within the service agreement as modified or amended. D. "Acceptable waste" shall have the same meaning as acceptable waste within the service agreement as modified or amended. E. ,"Co-composting facilitv" shall have the same meaning as co-composting facility within the service agreement as modified or amended. F. "Commercial hauler" means any person or governmentally owned solid waste utility that is authorized to collect and transport acceptable waste in Clallam County or within the City of Port Angeles. providing such person or governmentally owned solid waste utility is operating in an area that is covered under section 6.H. of the interlocal agreement. G. "Enyironmental fee" means a charge for a special inspection and recoverv of fluids and gases from acceptable special wastes in accordance with the waste acceptance policy. H. "Interlocal agreement" means the agreement between the City of Port Angeles. Clallam County and other parties for a Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System dated July 27. 2004 and as amended. ok "Municipal solid waste" shall have the same meaning as municipal solid waste within the service agreement as modified or amended. J. "Recycling drop-off facilitv" means a container located at the transfer station and Blue-Mountain drop-box facility for depositing recyclable materials and green. brown and clear recyclable glass bottles and iars. UP to 3 additional recycling drop-off facilities are provided at various locations within the City for depositing only green. brown and clear recyclable glass. K. "Recyclable materials" shall have the same meaning as recyclable materials for the transfer station and Blue Mountain recycling drop-off facilities in accordance within the service agreement. excluding acceptable household hazardous waste. acceptable moderate-risk waste. and white goods. as modified or amended. L. "Self-hauler" means any person' hauling' refuse from. or as a result of. any residence. business. commercial or industrial enterprise. regardless of where said enterprise is located in Clallam County. Any governmentally owned solid waste utility that does not enter into the interlocal agreement shall be considered a self-hauler. M. "Service agreement" means the solid waste processing facility development and management services agreement between the City of Port Angeles and Waste Connections of Washington. Inc. dated April 15. 2005 and as modified or amended. N. "Solid waste processing facility" means the Port Angeles transfer station. Blue Mountain drop-box facility. recycling drop-off facilities. Port Angeles co~composting facility. Port Angeles moderate-risk waste facility. and the Port Angeles landfill. all of which form the City's solid waste processing facility. O. "Unacceptable waste" shall have the same meaning as unacceptable waste within the service agreement as modified or amended. P. "Unsecured load" means waste that is not contained or restrained. such that the materialCan fall. slip or otherwise escape from the vehicle in which it is trahsported. and thereby be deposited onto a roadway or property adiacent to the roadway. Q. "Waste acceptance policy" means the waste acceptance policy for the applicable solid waste processing facility as amended. - 22- J - 44 . . . , ;'c;.'lF '.' . R. "Yard waste" received at the transfer station shall have the same meaning as vard waste or yard debris in accordance within the service agreement, as modified or amended. 13.57.020 Rates. At least 30 days prior to the date, the Director shall publish notice to the public of the date the solid waste processing facility will be open for business. Beginning on the date specified in a written notice from the Director to the public that the solid waste processing facility will be open for business, the following rates shall be in effect and supercede the rates specified in 13.56.020 P AMC: A. All commercial haulers shall be charged and pay the following rates at the transfer station: 1. $80.00 per ton for municipal solid waste and wastewater treatment plant Iff grit. 2. $24.80 per ton for clean yard waste, as determined by the transfer station attendant. which may be converted to compost. 3. $19.85 per ton for wastewater treatment plant biosolids. B. All self-haulers shall be charged and pay the following rates at the transfer station (except as set forth herein): 1. $97.00 per ton for municipal solid waste with a $10.00 minimum fee. 2. $40 per ton for clean yard waste, as determined by the transfer station attendant. which may be converted to compost with a $10.00 minimum fee. 3. In addition to the fees established by subsections 1 and 2 of this section, a self-hauler that delivers an unsecured load to the transfer station shall be charged a $10.00 fee. 4. There will be no fee charged for recyclable materials deposited into the recycling drop-off facility. There will be no fee charged for acceptable household hazardous waste received at the transfer station. 5. There will be no fee charged for acceptable moderate-risk waste received at the moderate-risk waste facility from residents covered under the. interlocal agreement. Commercially exempt small quantity generators shall not deposit moderate-risk waste at the moderate-risk waste facility. 6. Self-hauler rates shall be reduced by 4.6% for the federal government. its agencies and instrumentalities. 7. Rates for acceptable special waste shall be charged as follows: Item Rate Asbestos $235.70 per ton Tires (automobile and truck) $97.00 per ton Metals and white goods $47.65 per ton Environmental fee $20.00 per unit Contaminated or dredge soils $97.00 per ton. 8. In lieu of requiring multiple scale house transactions for loads with mixed municipal solid waste, the Director may establish weight reductions for recyclable materials, metals, acceptable household hazardous waste, and acceptable moderate-risk waste. The weight reductions approved by the Director shall be issued at the scale house. C. The self-hauler rate 13 .57.020.8.1. may be waived for disposal of refuse which is collected as a part of a beautification or cleanup program. The transfer station self-hauler rate . . - 23 - J - 45 1---- 13.57.020.B.1. may be reduced by 50% for certain proiects by non-profit organizations. Any waiver or reduction to the self-hauler rate shall comply with the following requirements: 1. The person requesting a waiver or reduction submits a written application to the Director at least 30 days before disposal of refuse at the transfer station. The Director shall accept or deny the application before refuse is disposed at the transfer station. 2. A waiver may be available for disposal of refuse which is collected as part of a beatification or cleanup program, such as the benefit dump day, Clallam County chain gang, and Washington State Department of Transportation, which must dispose oflitter. 3. A reduction may be available to charitable, nonprofit organizations, such as the Salvation Army, St. Vincent DePaul. and Serenity House, the primary purpose of which is provide necessary support for the poor or infirm and which must dispose of unusable donated items. 4. Pursuant to Chapter 35.83 RCW, a reduction may be applied to the Housing Authority of Clallam County for self-haul of materials left by tenants who vacate Housing Authoritv premises and for disposal of demolition debris. 5. All waivers or reductions approved by the Director shall be valid for 30 days and shall be limited to proiects that further the public health, safety, or welfare, enhances the environment. or is otherwise in the public interest for parties of the interlocal agreement. 6. In order for the waiver or reduction to be valid, applications approved by the Director shall be presented to the scale house attendant at the time of disposal. D. All self-haulers shall be charged and pay the following rates per ton at the Blue Mountain drop-box: 1. $184.00 per ton for municipal solid waste with a $5.00 minimum charge. 2. Recyclable materials deposited into the recycling drop-off facility will not be charged a fee. Acceptable household hazardous waste will not be charged a fee. 3. The self-hauler rate shall be reduced by 4.6% for the federal government. its agencies and instrumentalities. 13.57.030 Disposal Regulations. A. All commercial haulers and self-haulers shall comply with the waste acceptance policy. Only acceptable waste shall be deposited at a solid waste processing facility. Commercial haulers and self-haulers shall not deposit dangerous waste or unacceptable waste at any solid waste processing facility. Waste originating outside Clallam County shall be unacceptable for disposaL except with the prior written consent of the Director. B. Recycling drop-off facilities shall clearly identify and instruct self-haulers about the types of recyclable material that may be deposited. Self-haulers shall only deposit recyclable materials that are allowed to be deposited into a recycling drop-off facility. C. The Director may issue transfer station scale house reader cards, and commercial haulers and self-haulers shall use reader cards in accordance with the waste acceptance policy. Commercial haulers shall have vehicle tare weight determined by the City, shall only use the reader card for the vehicle it was issued for, and shall always use the outer-inbound scale unless otherwise specified by the Director. Self-haulers shall always use the reader card at the inner- inbound and inner-outbound scales, unless otherwise specified by the Director. In the event a reader card is lost or misplaced by a commercial hauler or self-hauler, the person responsible for - 24- J - 46 . . . . reader card shall be required to pay for all transactions at the transfer station scale house until the Director is notified in writing that the reader card has been lost or misplaced. Self-haulers shall pay a utility service fee in accordance with PAMC 3.70.01O.B.4. for an initial reader card and each replacement reader card issued. D. . It is unlawful for any person to enter the disposal area of any solid waste processing facility except when an attendant is present during the designated hours of operation. Those persons hauling their own refuse shall place such refuse where directed by the attendant and shall pay those fees as set forth by the City Council. E. It is unlawful for any unauthorized person to set fire to, or bum, any waste at any solid waste processing facility unless granted permission by the Director to do so. F. No unauthorized person shall scavenge, separate, collect. carry off. or dispose of, any waste material unless authorized to do so by written permit of the Director. G. Any person failing to abide by the disposal regulations. or creating a public disturbance in accordance with Chapter 9.24 PAMC. shall be subject to removal from the Solid Waste Processing Facility. . 13.57.040 Penalties. A. Any person subject to this Chapter who delivers dangerous waste or unacceptable waste in violation of the waste acceptance policy to a solid waste processing facility shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not less than $500 per violation. Each day that a violation continues constitutes a separate offense. B. Any person that delivers dangerous waste or unacceptable waste to a solid waste processing facility shall be liable to the City for any additional cost for removaL cleaning, and disposal of unacceptable waste by the contractor. C. Any person subject to this Chapter who fails or refuses to comoly with the waste acceptance policy, knowingly deposits recyclable materials into the wrong recycling drop-off facility, knowingly deposits waste that is not a recyclable material into a recycling drop-off facility, or knowingly deposits waste that is not yard waste at the co-composting facility, shaH be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof. shall be punished by a fine not less than $250 per violation. D. Any person who knowingly circumvents a scale house transaction, or makes any false statement or representation in any scale house transaction, waste manifest or other matter pursuant to this Chapter. shall (in addition to civil and/or criminal penalties provided by law) be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be prosecuted and punished accordingly. Section 5. Chapter 3.70 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code is hereby amended by amending 3.70.01O(B) to read as follows: . 3.70.010 Finance Department Fees. A. B. Utility ConnectionslReconnections & Automatic Turn-ons. 1. Utility connections/reconnections during regular working hours (8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) - $25.00 - 25- J - 47 2. 3. 4. Automatic turn-ons pursuant to property owner agreements - $15.00 Utility service - $15 Utility service - $25. C. Section 6 - Severability. If any provisions of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, or application of the provisions of the Ordinance to other persons or circumstances, is not affected. Section 7 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days following the date of its publication by summary. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of April, 2006. Karen A. Rogers, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Becky J. Upton, City Clerk William E. Bloor, City Attorney PUBLISHED: April . 2006 By Summary G:\Legal_Backup\ORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONS\2006-09.SolidWasteUtility&Landfil1.032806. wpd:March 31, 2006 (1 2:30pm) - 26- J - 48 L . . . \ 'J Public Works & Utilities Presentation to City Council Solid Waste Rates April 4, 2006 Larry Dunbar Power Resources Manager 417-4710Idunbar(Qlcitvofoa.us Tom McCabe Solid Waste Superintendent 417-4872 tmccabe(Qlcitvofoa.us Overview and Purpose of the Presentation 1. Background 2. Collection rates & ordinance amendments 3. Landfill rates & ordinance amendments 4. Transfer station rates & new ordinance 5. Summary I- . Background ~ Landfill closure anticipated by end of 2006 ~ Interlocal agreement between City & County ~ Solid Waste request for proposals 2004 Background ~ Cost of service study 2004 ~ Waste Connections Service Agreement 2005 ~ Rate-setti ng process ~ Tonight Open public hearing then 1st reading of ordinances 2 Acronyms & Definitions ~ MsW means municipal solid waste ~ HHW means household hazardous waste (Le., automotive batteries, oil, antifreeze) ~ MRW means moderate-risk waste (e.g., paint, flammable liquids, pesticides, etc...) ~ WWTP means waste-water treatment plant Acronyms & Definitions ~ Commercial hauler means a person with a G- permit from the Utilities & Transportation Commission, covered under interlocal agreement ~ Self-hauler means residential & commercial, commercial haulers not covered under interlocal agreement 3 Residential Collection Rates ~ Move to volume-based rates - 90 gallon weekly & every other week garbage collection rates ~ New curbside recycling & yard waste collection services ~ New transportation & disposal costs . Residential Collection Rates ~ Bundled rate for refuse/recycling services ~ Unbundled rate for optional yard waste service ~ Lead time for implementation planning & execution ~ Rate adjustment effective July 1, 2006 4 Residential Collection Rates Weekly Sennee .~_~ $212J~301} ~c::g& Every Other Week $2(.8.....5 Service I II .} Ya:.;;:te ~ rOi II Optional $~ $10 $20 $30 I I Monthly Charge i III Proposed Rate July 1, 2006 III January 2006 Rate Commercial Collection Rates ~ Currently volume-based weekly setout rates - 90 & 300 gallon ~ New curbside cardboard recycling ~ New transportation & disposal costs 5 . Commercial Collection Rates ~ Bundled rate for refuse/recycling services ~ Rate adjustment effective January 1, 2007 ~ Unbundled rate option for School District recycling in addition to cardboard recycling (effective July 1, 2006) Proposed Commercial Collection Rates j I, Commercial _$79.45 300 Gallon .....................,,;; ..... $75.65 ~ I I I :1 '. ' I commercial......... $.22.95 I I 90 Gallon ..... 1$21.85 I . . I I '., '+ 1 !. i I : ~ i DS~ht~Otl . $1 0.50 Be. ginnirig Ju IY".l' 2006 Optional Isnc LJ ! i i Recycling i . i I · I $0 $25 $50 $75 I i Monthly Charge Per Weekly Setout: . Proposed Rate January 1, 2007 - Recycling I July 1,2006 I fi!il January 2006 Rate . Garbage & Cardboard Recycling Included 6 Collection Ordinance Amendments ~ Incorporate rate adjustments ~ Recycling, yard waste, every other week (EOW) refuse, and cardboard recycling services must be requested ~ Utility service fee to return to collect container & additional collections Collection Ordinance Amendments ~ Refuse outside of containers & overloaded containers not collected ~ Utility service fee to change from weekly to every other week & to restart recycling and yard waste ~ Temporary service fees 7 I. Collection Ordinance Amendments ~ Recycling participants must deposit all recyclables into recycling container instead of refuse container ~ Regular recycling setouts needed to retain service ~ Recycling & yard waste contamination Collection Ordinance Amendments ~ Yard waste outside of containers before & after July 1, 2006 ~ Glass recycling available at drop-off facility locations after July 1, 2006 ~ Shared and restricted commercial containers 8 Landfill Ordinance Amendments ~ Rates in effect until processing facility opens ~ Yard Waste rate adjustment July 1, 2006 ~ Director allowance to enter special contracts prior to closure: ,/ 90 day maximum term without City Council approval ,/ City Manager & Council members on UAC notified Transfer Station Rates ~ Commercial hauler rates (in lieu of contract) ~ Self-hauler rates (residential & commercial) ~ Yard waste rate 9 Transfer Station Rates ~ Wastewater treatment plant biosolids & grit rates ~ Rates in effect upon opening (anticipated January 2007) ~ Future uncertainties... Transfer Station Commercial Hauler Rates I i I I I I I : I MSW-Under ~..mT"""" -~ c=c:r:oo Agreement ~ "'vv.~v I WWTP Biosolids - r- $ 8 I I Under Interlceal 19. 5 I ~~ment I WWTP Grit - Under I $80 00 I Interlocal j . 'I Agreement I , I U~:~t~~~c-al _ $24,8q Beginning July 1, 2006 I Agreement I I I 1 I I $0 $50 $100 1 ! I : Charge Per Ton I i i II. January 2006 Rate II Proposed Rate II Proposed Rates anticipated to be in effect January 1, 2007 10 Transfer Station Self.Hauler Rates Special Waste - Tires w Ji%oo .1$97.00 $4Y",; ~.70 ...:.1: ii~ W$209 ~5.70 I $9700 I $64.70 Jginning July 1, 2od6 Jginning July 1, 2od6 I I , Muo'opa''''d''''.'' ~ Special Waste - Contaminated or Dredge Soil Special V\laste - VIItl~ Goods & Metals Spao.' Woste . Asbesto.1 1 Yard Waste - Residential _ $40.00 I 1 YardWaste-Corrrnercial ~~Q.OO i $0 $100 $200 Charge Per Ton Bi January 2006 Rate. Projected Rate Proposed Rates anticipated to be in effect January 1, 2007 Transfer Station Self.Hauler Fees 1 I. I I u~~~'oo, m '''1 . I I I M' . F ~~ $10.00 -- OOj~Tr I I Envivironmental $20.00 Fee I I I I I i , $. $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 ! !IIJanuary 2006 Fe~:~:posed Fee) : Proposed Fees anticipated to be in effect January 1, 2007 11 Blue Mountain Self-Hauler Rates Municipal Solid Waste $0 $100 $200 Charge Per Ton l!ill January 2006 Rate. Proposed Rate Proposed Rate anticipated to be in effect January 1, 2007 New Processing Facility Ordinance ~ Based on Landfill ordinance ~ Blue Mountain drop-box self-hauler rate ~ Transfer station commercial hauler rates 12 New Processing Facility Ordinance ~ Transfer station self-hauler rates ./ Minimum fee ./ Unsecured loads ./ Environmental fee ./ No charge for recycling, household hazardous waste, moderate-risk waste ./ Maintain 50% rate reduction & rate waivers ~ Scale house reader card charges Summary Tonight o Open public hearing o 1 st reading of ordinances April 18, 2006 o Continue & close public hearing o Adopt ordinances 13 I . .. R E C.J:I V E D APR - 3 2006 April 3, 2006 To: City Council Members City of Port Angeles From: Gary Gleason 2211 E. 7th Ave. Port Angeles Re: Proposed Land Fill Dumping rates Dear Council Membeffi: As I may not be back from my appointment in Seattle on April 4 in time_ to give testimony on the new proposed dumping charges and the method of application, I am submitting this letter. City of Port Angeles For many years we have used the city land fill as our site to dispose of our household trash, to recycle materials, and to deposit extra yard waste. We do extensive recycling, and composting of plant materials; however, some things just need to go into a land fill. Since we live in the County by a few yards and have not used the private pickup service for several reasons dealing with their lack of flexibility, we have always taken our own trash to the land fill in our own vehicles. The current system of a flat rate for the first 180 pounds results in a excess charge for a limited amount of material which goes into the land fill for which the $8.00 charge is applied. It has been many years since I have ever paid more than this basic charge because of a bigger load. A typical example is the last load I had a couple of weeks ago. I took 4 standard garbage cans, the weight was only 60 pounds, thus a cost of 13 cents a pound, not the 4 cents a pound if I had been closer to the maximum allowed. Also, we do use a trash compactor to reduce the volume. However, this is not the major impact of this current flat rate system. The real impact is, "Why recycle?" Since we do recycle glass, cans, plastics, composed plant matter, and keep the paper stuff out of the landfill. The amount of trash which must buried, and _ in the future, hauled off to the far side of the State, is only a small fraction of the total household trash. I could put all of the plastic; kitchen waste, cans and glass back into the cans going to the landfill and not exceed the 180 pound limit. So why recycle? We would only need to recycle the newspapers. This is not what you want to promote in the future when the material must be taken out of the County. My next concern is the proposed $10.00 flat rate to bring excess yard waste to the compost pile. I have just finished cleaning up from the Winter storms and have taken about 26 garbage cans full of stuff to the compost pile at the landfill. Since I do not have a truck, I put the stuff in standard garbage cans in my VW Van]. While I can get 8 cans in the Van, a normal load was 4 to 5 cans each trip, thus under the proposed system the total charQes could have been 60 to 70 dollaffi to clean up the blow down. We do have a small chipper so 6 more cans of stuff went around the raised beds as mulch. While I sure could have maxed out the Van each load, and-perhaps chipped up more of the blowdown, cedar branches, fir cones and small branches make poor compost. There is a major problem now in both the County and City with people dumping yard waste over creek banks, plus household trash on every back road. Please do not make it more tempting to avoid using the new transfer station and composting facility. ' . So I ask you to consider using some system where the amount of material, by weight, most likely, is the basis for your changes. Surely in this day of advanced computer systems, a program that calculates the cost based on the scale weight can be found. A small base charge and then a per pound charge seems to be a much better system. The attendant at the scale house, even now, .must make change. Surely some rate of a per pound system can be found which results in small even dollar and cents charges for those of us who bring our own trash to the new Transfer station and Composting facility. Thank you for your attention to this matter. While I live in the County, you set the price and the fee system that the County seems to adopt. I will send a letter to the County Commissioners so that they also know my views on this matter. :r;;;J;~~ Gary Gleason ~.to: ~~ <i-3-tJ/.p &. - . . . ~ORWGELES WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO DATE: April 4, 2006 To: CITY COUNCIL Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities ~(;v1./ FROM: SUBJECT: Tilt Hopper Asphalt Paver: Reject Bids Summary: Bids were received on February 28,2006 fora tilt hopper asphalt paver for the Public Works and Utilities Department. Two vendors bid on this piece of equipment, Special Products Inc. and Sahlberg Equipment Company; Bids were significantly above the amount budgeted for this equipment. Recommendation: Reject bids for contract 06-12. Background/Analysis: Bids for a tilt hopper asphalt paver were advertised in both Seattle and local newspapers and also directly solicited from companies that previously expressed interest in bidding on this equipment. Bids closed on February 28,2006 with two vendors bidding, Special Products Inc. and Sahlberg Equipment Company. Bids were significantly above the amount budgeted for this equipment. The lowest bid received was $51,585.68, exceeding available funding by $16,586. Bid results are summarized in the following table. Purchase Contract 06-12 (Prices Include Sales Tax and Fees) Bid Amount $53,879.25 $51,585.68 $35,000.00 The current bids should be rejected. Staff will re-evaluate the technical requirements and further research both the new and used market for this equipment prior to re-soliciting. N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Aphalt Paver - Reject Bids.doc K - 1 . . . K - 2 . DATE: To: FROM: SUBJECT: ~ORTANGELES WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO April 4, 2006 CITY COUNCIL GLENN A. CUTLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES 1>v...C/ DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY COORDINATED PREVENTION GRANT G0600218 Summary: The City's application for Coordinated Prevention Grant (CPG) funds for 2006-2007 has been approved by the Department of Ecology for total costs of$217,609. The grant is a 75/25 match, and the city share for the two year grant cycle is $54,403. The eligible costs are for the collection, recycling, and/or disposal activities at the new Moderate Risk Waste Collection facility ($130,435), waste reduction and recycling public awareness and education activities ($23,317), and the completion of the update to the 2000 Clallam County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan ($63,857). . Recommendation: Accept the CPG for total eligible costs of $217,609 and authorize the Director of Public Works and Utilities to sign the agreement. y Backeround / Analvsis: The City has participated in this grant program for many years. During the 2004-2005 grant cycle, the total maximum eligible costs were $254,180: $120,000 for the design and construction of the MRW facility, $61,450 for waste reduction and recycling public outreach and education activities, and $72,730 for updating the 2000 Clallam County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. The Solid Waste Utility applied to the Washington State Department of Ecology for CPG funds in September 2005 for 2006-2007 solid waste activities. The City was awarded the grant in March 2006 for total eligible costs of$217,609. The grant is a 75/25 match. The eligible costs are for the collection, recycling, and/or disposal activities at the new Moderate Risk Waste Collection facility ($130,435), waste reduction and recycling public awareness and education activities ($23,317), and the completion of the update to the 2000 Clallam County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan ($63,857). . The City's matching funds have been allocated in the 2006 landfill budget, and staff will propose allocating matching funds in the 2007 budget. It is recommended that Council accept the CPG for total eligible costs of$217,609 and authorize the Director of Public Works and Utilities to sign the agreement. . N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\CP Grant.doc K - 3 . . . K - 4 1- - . . . CALL TO ORDER- REGULAR MEETING: ROLL CALL: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: PRESENTATIONS, CEREMONIAL MATTERS & PROCLAMATIONS: WORK SESSION: LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON THIS OR FUTURE AGENDAS: PUBLIC COMMENT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING Port Angeles, Washington March 21, 2006 Mayor Rogers called the regular meeting ofthe Port Angeles City Council to order at 6:00 p.m Members Present: Mayor Rogers, Deputy Mayor Williams, Councilmembers Braun, Erickson, Headrick, Munro, and Wharton. Members Absent: None. Staff Present: Manager Madsen, Attorney Bloor, C. Hagar, G. Kenworthy, D. McKeen, T. Riepe, S. Johns, S. Roberds, and N. West. G & G Summer, M. Sears, E. Tuttle, L. Ross, J Halkett, V. & L. Sproat, P. Tietz, R. Veenema, T. Bihn, P. Lamoureux, D. Hudgens, C. Newman, P. Walker, K. Rotrnark, J. Jones, D. Holst, J. Ralston, A. Turner, C. Philpott, J. Henderson, R. Casey, V. Embree, M. Jones, R. Jones, S. Zenovic, K. Baymor, and J. Catania. All others present in the audience failed to sign the roster. Public Present: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Councilmember Wharton. Mayor Rogers briefly summarized the agenda noting that, to make the best use of time, the agenda would not be followed in order. She then deferred to Councilmember Headrick, who read into the record a statement regarding his appointment to the vacant City Council position. None. None. There were no late items for the agenda, so Mayor Rogers opened the floor to public comment, asking those present to reserve comment regarding a particular agenda item until the item was presented for discussion. Russ Veenema, Executive Director of the Port Angeles Chamber of Commerce, informed the Council that due to a lack of affordable housing in the community, a Housing Availability Task Force has been formed to raise awareness, research options, learn from other communities, and suggest a course of action. He indicated that City staff member Scott Johns has been a helpful member of the Task Force. Mr. Veenerna acknowledged the comment deadline for the Comprehensive Plan was at the end of the month, and he asked thatthe Council's review and update of the Plan include decisions that allow housing to develop that will fit the needs of expected growth in both the City limits and the DOA. L - 1 - I - March 21, 2006 City Council Meeting PUBLIC COMMENT: (Cont'd) CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS: RESOLUTIONS: Support of County's Enactment of 1/10 of 1% Sales Tax for Expanded Mental Health & Chemical Dependency Treatment in Clallam County Resolution No. 06-06 Pam Tietz, Executive Director of the Clallam County Housing Authority, described the make up of the Task Force, stressing the importance of having available housing for all sectors of income, not just low income people. Ms. Tietz stated the Task Force hoped to devise a method offorming both public and private partnerships to ensure workable solutions to the housing problems. . Several residents then addressed the Council regarding the appointment of Richard Headrick to fill the vacant position on the City Council. Speaking in opposition to Mr. Headrick's appointment were: Burt Pierce, 115 W. 11 th Street; Alan Turner, owner of Port Book and News, 104 E. First Street; Jessica Wessler, 911 S. Cedar; Tom Bihn, 308 E. 9th Street; Veronica Flake, 3752 Hill Circle; LeRoy Sprout, 615 Thistle Street; Virginia Sprout, 615 Thistle Street; Rev. Lynn Lohr, 1114 E. 4th Street; Karl Baymor, 125 Southridge Road; Ed Tuttle, 3909 Old Time Place; Katherine Schwartzbacker, 3518 McDougal Avenue; Matt Burn, 1122 S. Cedar Street; Jane Vanderhoof, owner of West Wind Farm on Salt Creek; and Ileana Murphy Haggerty, 2905 S. Laurel Street. Speaking in support of Mr. Headrick's appointment were: Lorraine Ross, 940 W. 51h Street, City Councilmember from 1970 to 1977; Doug Holst, 635 Georgiana Street; Jodi Catania, 805 W. 8th Street; and Derrick Konopaski, 1016 Pearce Road. None. 1. Support of County 's Enactment of 1/10 of 1% Sales Taxfor Expanded Mental Health & Chemical Dependency Treatment in Clallam County: Mayor Rogers invited Ms. Norma Turner to the microphone to provide a summary of the proposed sales tax increase. Ms. Turner distributed information to the Council which listed the reasons expanded mental health and substance abuse treatment in ClallamCounty was necessary. She thanked the City Council for this opportunity to speak and noted that the Rand Study stated that the most cost effective way to treat mental health and substance abuse issues is through treatment rather thanjail time. Our jails are overflowing, and something must be done to lower the pressure on the Emergency Room and law enforcement. Ms. Turner reviewed the information contained in the handout and informed the Council that monies collected through this tax would be local dollars, dispensed locally and according to local needs. She noted that both State and Federal dollars are tightening up, and people who had previously been served by Peninsula Mental Health Clinic are now falling between the cracks. Ms. Turner stated that she is finding that the majority of people she approaches are offering overwhelming support of this additional tax. . Mayor Rogers thanked Ms. Turner for her work on this issue and noted that, through her work with the Association of Washington Cities, this subject has been discussed statewide. The adoption of this new tax offers the opportunity to assist those in need and mitigate the impacts on the local police, fire, and hospital. Mayor Rogers also commended Senator Hargrove for his efforts on this issue. Mayor Rogers then opened the floor for comments and discussion. Councilntember Munro asked ifthere was anything in the legislation to sunset this tax. Ms. Turner said that anything enacted can be rescinded, but she reminded the Council that any funds collected by this tax can only be used for mental health services. She stated that a recommendation has been made to form an advisory committee, consisting of 19 representatives from the cities, tribes, schools, etc. The charge of the committee is to once a year report on the status of behavioral health services. As time goes by, if it appears there is no difference being made, the citizens have the right to say the tax is no longer needed. Ms. Turner noted that Jefferson County has already approved the new tax. . L-2 - 2- . . . RESOLUTIONS: (Cont'd) Support of County's Enactment of 1/10 of 1 % Sales Tax for Expanded Mental Health & Chemical Dependency Treatment in Clallam County Resolution No. 06-06 (Cont'd) :''''''._;~~!;'o~E'''''' :~;" ,..~.--,.., Break RESOLUTIONS: Initiative and Referendum Resolution No. 7-06 CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 21, 2006 Lorraine Ross, 940 W. Fifth Street, noting the need for improved mental health services in the community, spoke in support of the 1/10 of 1 % tax. Jane Vanderhoof, owner of West Wind Farm on Salt Creek, spoke in support of the tax increase, and encouraged the Council to pass the Resolution. Peter Ripley, 114 E. 6th St., #102, spoke in support of the additional tax and approval of the Resolution. Deb Reed, 1727 E. Woodhaven Lane, a Board Member of the Community Mental Health Center, noted there was a broad base of support for this additional tax and asked the Council to pass the Resolution. Mayor Rogers asked for any other comments, either in favor of or against the proposal. There being none, she read the Resolution by title, entitled RESOLUTION NO. 06-06 RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, declaring support for expanded mental health and chemical dependency treatment in Clallam County by imposing an additional 1/1 0 of 1 % sales tax. Councilmember Williams. moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. Councilmember Erickson seconded the motion. Following discussion, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously. Mayor Rogers recessed the meeting for a break at 7:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 7:12 p.m. 2. Initiative and Referendum: Mayor Rogers deferred to Attorney Bloor, who explained there were three possible actions the Council could take, adopt Resolution No.1, adopt Resolution No.3, or adopt no Resolution. Each of these actions has potential negative consequences for the City. He stated his purpose was to simply provide the Council with the information needed to make a decision. Attorney Bloor stated that he had presented to the City Council members copies ofthe two resolutions, all correspondence from Gerald Steel; the petition circulated for signature, the letter from Municipal Research Services Center (MRSC), and a letter from the City's Bond Counsel. In addition, he had invited Mr. Thomas Ahearne, an attorney who is an expert on Initiative and Referendum matters. Attorney Bloor then gave a PowerPoint presentation, briefly summarizing the information he had distributed, as well as the Initiative and Referendum process and powers, the alternatives and ramifications of each, and the recommendation that the Council adopt Resolution No.1. Attorney Bloor then introduced Thomas Aheame, an attorney with the firm of Foster Pepper in Seattle. This firm has a statewide standing and reputation in municipal law, and Mr. Ahearne is an expert in the field of Initiative and Refe~endum issues. Mr. Aheame stated he reviewed all records, including the drafts of the resolutions, and he felt adopting Resolution No. I was the least risky alternative, as it adopts the Initiative and Referendum powers, nothing more, nothing less. He stated it was the safest course to take because, if and when citizens adopt an initiative and referendum under Resolution No.1, there would be no question that the process is that which is authorized by State law. Mr. Aheame continued that the language in Resolution No. 3 is slightly different than what State law authorizes. A Court may fmd that Resolution No.3 is fine as written, or it could fmd that it adopts more than is allowed or less than L-3 - 3 - March 21, 2006 City Council M~eting RESOLUTIONS: (Cont'd) Initiative and Referendum Resolution No. 7-06 (Cont'd) is allowed by State law. If an initiative is passed under Resolution No. 3 and is challenged, it could be argued that the process violated State law, because the Ordinance that allowed the Initiative and Referendum to be adopted violated State law. For this reason, Mr. Ahearne supported the adoption of Resolution No.1. Mr. Ahearne then responded to questions posed by the Council and provided additional clarification. . Mayor Rogers opened the floor to public comment. Peter Ripley, 114 E. 6th Street, #102, spoke in support of the Initiative and Referendum process and Resolution No.1. Ron Richards, 124 Township Line Road, has a fishing vessel moored at the marina, so Council actions affect him. He felt Resolution No. 1 ignores the voters and the petition; he supported the adoption of Resolution No.3. Paul Lamoureux, 602 E Whidby, echoed the comments of Mr. Richards and also supported Resolution No.3. Mr. Lamoureux read aloud a letter from Gerald Steel, who felt the language in Resolution No.1 was unacceptable. ".i"'Ann Mathewson, 1923 W. 6th Street, submitted for the record a list drawn up by the citizens who worked on the petition, which outlined steps they felt should be taken by the City Council in regards to the Initiative and Referendum process. Tammy Ratliff, 50 Benson Road, felt that, due to past events, people do not always feel the City Council is working for them. She asked Mr. Ahearne which of the two ResolutionS would open up loopholes that would allow the City to avoid the wishes of the citizens. Mr. Ahearne replied that Resolution No.1 simply says that whatever State law allows, you get. There are no loopholes or exceptions. Looking at it from just a litigation perspective, Resolution No.3 could be viewed as having illegal wording, as . it goes beyond what State law allows; therefore the process of Initiative and Referendum is null and void. This would result in not only the Resolution be thrown out, but more importantly, whatever issue the citizens had just voted on would be thrown out of Court as well. Ms. Ratliff agreed with Mr. Lamoureux's comments, and asked the Council to pay more attention to what the people are saying. Perry Spring, 415 E 11th Street, supported Resolution No.3, with the proviso that the City seek a legal opinion of the petition wording from the Attorney General. Ron Richards, 124 Township Line Road, returned to the microphone to reiterate his position that Resolution No.3 does not exceed State law. If it does, there is a savings clause in the petition. Perry Spring, 415 E 11th Street, returned to the podium to ask how an alternate to the Resolution submitted by Mr. Steel on behalf of the citizens came to be on the docket. Attorney Bloor responded that he drafted the Resolution as a normal part of the process, long before a resolution was submitted by Mr. Steel. Attorney Bloor stated the original resolution submitted by Mr. Steel became Resolution No.2, then he received from Mr. Steel Resolution No.3. Discussion ensued and clarification of the process was again provided. Councilrnember Williams expressed concern over the City's bond rating if the Resolution that is adopted does not meet the authority granted under State law and becomes the target of a lawsuit. Finance Director Ziomkowski explained the importance of a good bond rating and how it impacts the City fmancially. . Paul Lamoureux, 603 Whidby Street, felt this had nothing to do with the bond rating. He did not feel the people of Port Angeles would ever vote on an issue that would put the City in fmancial jeopardy. L-4 -4- . . . RESOLUTIONS: (Cont'd) Initiative and Referendum Resolution No. 7-06 (Cont'd) Break RESOLUTIONS: (Cont'd) Initiative and Referendum Res.olution No. 7-06 (Cont'd) , ) '" ' ,. ';. .' 1;"1" '" CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 21, 2006 Councilmember Williams asked ifboth Resolutions could be adopted, to which Mr. Bloor replied they could not, adding that based on citizen concerns that limited I & R powers would be received with Resolution No.1, language could be added to the Resolution stating there would be no restrictions. Councilmember Wharton asked if the phrases "in response to the citizens" and "full and unrestricted powers" could be added to Resolution No. 1. Mr. Bloor replied affrrrnatively. Manager Madsen indicated the Council must now make a decision, as its responsibility is to listen to the interests and concerns of the constituents, take into consideration the fiduciary responsibilities to the City and its citizens, and then come to a policy decision. He recommended the Council deliberate among themselves at this time. Tammy Ratliff, . 50 Benson Road, asked Mr. Bloor for further clarification of the process, which he provided. Mr. Bloor stressed that when writing Resolution No.1, he never intended to restrict the powers. If this is the concern, then adding language along the lines of that suggested by Councilmember Wharton is certainly possible. Councilmember Williams felt Mr. Bloor's words regarding amending Resolution No. 1 were critically important and should definitely be part of the record, as it goes to legislative intent should there ever be a problem in the future. Ms. Ratliff approved of the wording suggested by Councilmember Wharton. Perry Spring, 415 E 11th Street, felt steps have been taken tonight to rebuild trust, he agreed to adding wording to Resolution No. 1. Paul Christopher, 119 E. 2nd Street, asked what determines ifan issue is administrative vs. legislative, and Mr. Bloor stated there is a Court rule that lays out specific criteria, which was previously explained and is not germane to the resolution language. Discussion followed, and Councilmember Williams suggested tabling the issue to the next meeting when Bond Counsel could be consulted and/or the Resolution could be amended to everyone's satisfaction. Manager Madsen noted that Councilmember Wharton had suggested language, and he proposed Attorney Bloor repeat the changes as suggested for Council's consideration, which he did. After discussion and clarification of the wording changes, Councilmember Munro suggested CotjIlcil convene for a break to give Mr. Bloor the opportunity to incorporate the changes. Mayor Rogers recessed the meeting for a break at 9:05 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:20 p.m. Attorney Bloor distributed copies of the new draft resolution and at Mayor Roger's request, read it aloud in its entirety. Brief discussion ensued and minor wording changes were suggested. Councilmember Williams moved to adopt the Resolution as read and as set forth below by title. Councilmember Erickson seconded the motion. RESOLUTION NO. 07-06 A RESOLUTION ofthe City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, declaring the intent of the City Council to adopt the right of initiative and referendum for the registered voters ofthe City; providing for publication of this Resolution; and providing that an Ordinance adopting the initiative and referendum process for the City shall be presented unless a timely and sufficient referendum petition has been filed referring the question to the registered voters of the City. Following further discussion and comment by the Council, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously. L - 5 -5- March 21, 2006 City Council Meeting PUBLIC HEARINGS - QUASI JUDICIAL: 1. Ralston Rezone - Park/Porter: Ralston Rezone - ParkerIPorter Ordinance No. 3240 Mayor Rogers stated this was a continuation ofa public hearing held on March 7,2006, reminding the Council they were still under Appearance of Fairness. She asked if there had been any changes since the last hearing to cause a conflict, and none were stated. . Associate Planner Johns reviewed the proposed rezone, displayed a map of the area, and stated the issues before the Council are the underlying Comprehensive Plan, site location, and the surrounding development. All these indicators would support the rezone. Discussion ensued, and Deputy Director of Engineering Services Kenworthy provided a summary of improvements that had taken place on Park Avenue, to include the installation of a storm drain and paving. The paving is in disrepair for reasons currently under investigation, but it will be corrected in the spring. Curb and gutter was installed to the north. Clarification was provided to the Council in that RMD zoning for this a~~a would have been allowed in either of the Comprehensive Plans. Also discussedwere drainage improvements made to Park A venue, with pick up of the gutter flow on the north side of Park Avenue; improved ditch drainage along the south side; and the correction of drainage problems on Park Avenue, east of Porter Street. Applicable storm drainage regulations will be enforced at the time of development. Mayor Rogers reopened the public hearing at 9:39 p.rn. Steve Zenovic, Principle Engineer, 519 S. Peabody Street, stated the drainage basin of the project is about 70 acres, of which this parcel covers a little more than 1.8 acres or less than 3%. He noted the City is running out of areas zoned RHD and RMD, and he asked the Council to approve the rezone. Penny Hall, 1107 Grant Avenue, spoke in opposition to the rezone because of severe stormwater problems in the area, a previous decision to place a drug rehabilitation center in the area, and her fear that a rezone would lead to apartments being built and rented to students from Peninsula College. . Julie Smith, 1107 E. Park Avenue, noted three drains going into the Franklin School field, asking if that would be fixed as part of the plan. Deputy Director Kenworthy stated the field along the school serves as a biofilter, and Ms. Smith felt the water was damaging the ground ofthe field to the point that children could no longer play there. She stated her opposition to the rezone until the time the drainage problems have been resolved. There being no further testimony, Mayor Rogers closed the public hearing at 9:54 p.rn. Discussion followed with the Council asking questions on such matters as resolving the drainage problem and what improvements are required as part of the rezone consideration and/or part of the Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Rogers read the Ordinance by title, entitled ORDINANCE NO. 3240 AN ORDINANCE ofthe City ofPort Angeles, Washington, rezoning property in the 1100 block of Park A venue from RS-7 (Residential, Single Family) to RMD (Residential, Medium Density). Following further discussion regarding the drainage issue, Councilmember Williams moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title, inclusive of Findings 1 - 18, and Conclusions 1-7. Councilmember Munro seconded the motion. Following further discussion and opinions expressed by the Councilmembers, a vote was taken on the . motion, which carried 4 - 3, with Councilmembers Braun, Erickson, and Wharton voting in opposition. L-6 - 6- . . . PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER: OlyCAP Loan Agreement for Dental Clinic - City CDBG Funds Continue Meeting Beyond 10:00 p.m. Anderson Street Vacation OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Ennis Creek Subdivision CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 21, 2006 1. OlyCAP Loan Agreementfor Dental Clinic - City CDBG Funds: Attorney Bloor stated this, was the second of two . required public hearings on reprogramming $30,000 ofCDBG funds to allow those funds to be loaned to OlyCAP for the development of a dental clinic. There was no new information to be presented. Mayor Rogers opened the public hearing at 10:23 p.m. Paul Lamoureux, 602 Whidby, cautioned the Council as the City would not have control. There was no further testimony, and the public hearing was closed at 10:26 p.rn. Councilmember Williams moved to redesignate $30,000 from the CDBG program for housing to a loan in the amount of $30,000 to OlyCAP for the purpose of completing a dental clinic. Councilmember Erickson seconded the motion. Councilmember Munro offered an amendment to charge 3% interest on the loan as an incentive for repayment. Councilmember Williams, as maker of the motion, agreed to the amendment. Councilmember Erickson opposed the amendment. Councilman Headrick seconded the amendment. Following discussion and clarification regarding penalty and interest, Councilmember Munro moved to amend the amendment to charge interest of 3% per annum after one year. Councilmember Headrick agreed as seconder. The vote on the motion carried 5- 2, with Councilmembers Erickson and Braun voting in opposition. Councilmember Williams moved to extend the meeting beyond 10:00 p.m. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Braun and carried unanimously. 2. Anderson Street Vacation: Principal Planner West reviewed the staff report which supported the street vacation. Mayor Rogers opened the public hearing at 10:37 p.m. There was no on presentto address the issue; therefore, the public hearing was closed at 10:38 p.rn. Mayor Rogers fulfilled the requirement for a first reading of the Ordinance by title, entitled ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, vacation portions of "P"Street and Sixteenth Street, in Port Angeles, Clallam County,' Washington. 1. Ennis Creek Subdivision: Mayor Rogers reminded the Council that the appearance of fairness doctrine applies to this item, at which time, Councilmember Williams recused himself in the appearance of fairness and left the room at 10:40 p.m. Mayor Rogers asked appearance offairness questions. of the City Council. Councilmember Munro stated he had talked to his neighbor, Mr. Mantooth, about this matter regarding the general issues of the stream. Councilmember Headrick also discussed this with Mr. Mantooth, but it was in the past and before the developer purchased the property. No one in the audience stated that any of the Councilmembers should be disqualified from the consideration. Associate Planner Johns presented the staff report on the proposed street vacation and used PowerPoint slides to demonstrate maps of the area under discussion. Councilmember Braun inquired as to the stormwater situation in that area, to which Mr. Johns deferred to Steve Zenovic, Zenovic and Associates, who is designing the stormwater facilities. Steve Zenovic, 519 S. Peabody Street, described the measures being taken to supply L-7 -7- March 21, 2006 City Council Meeting OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: (Cont'd) Ennis Creek Subdivision (Cont'd) Campbell Avenue PRD ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC HEARINGS: Limited Tax General Obligation Bond, 2006 (Multi-Modal Property Acquisition) Ordinance No. 3241 FINANCE: stormwater drainage in the vacated area. Lengthy discussion ensued, and Mr. Zenovic and Mr. Johns responded to questions and provided clarification on several issues involving the vacated site. Of particular concern to the Council was potential stormwater drainage problems, sidewalks, and traffic flow in the area. . Councilmember Munro moved to concur with the Planning Commission recommendation and approve the preliminary Ennis Creek Subdivision, citing Conditions 1 - 8, adding a 9th Condition which would require the developer to put in a sidewalk on one side of the street on the frontage of the development, on the western side of Del Guzzi Drive; Findings 1- 22; and Conclusions 1 - 5 as set forth in Exhibit "A", which is attached to and becomes a part of these minutes. Councilmember Braun seconded the motion. Following further discussion and clarification, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried 6 - 1, with Councilmember Headrick voting in opposition. Councilrnember Williams then returned to the Council Chambers. 2. Campbell Avenue PRD: Associate Planner Johns presented the staff report on the Campbell Avenue PRD, using PowerPoint slides to display maps of the area under discussion. Mayor Rogers reminded the Council this was a continued item, and they are still bound by appearance of fairness. Councilmember Wharton moved to approve the preliminary Campbell Avenue Planned Residential Development and Subdivision, citing Conditions 1-20, Findings 1 - 33, and Conclusions 1 - '15 as set forth in Exhibit "B",which is attached to and becomes a part of these minutes. Councilmember Munro seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Mayor Rogers thanked Green Crow for its patience and acknowledged the hard work of the staff. . I. Limited Tax General Obligation Bond, 2006 (Multi-Modal Property Acquisition) : Attorney Bloor reviewed the background on this matter and responded to questions posed by the Council. In fulfilling the requirement for a second reading of the Ordinance, Mayor Rogers read the Ordinance by title, entitled ORDINANCE NO. 3241 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, ratifying and confmning the Council's approval of a purchase and sale agreement for the acquisition by the City of certain real property; authorizing the issuance to the seller of such real property of a limited tax general obligation bond of the City in the principal amount of$1,200,000 in accordance with the terms of such agreement; providing the date, form, and terms of the bond: and authorizing the annual levy of taxes to pay the principal of and interest on the bond. Councilmember Braun moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. The motion was seconded by Council member Headrick. Following comment by the Council, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously. . Due to the lateness of the hour, Councilmember Erickson moved to combine the Finance Items with the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Williams seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. L-8 - 8 - . . . CONSENT AGENDA: INFORMATION: EXECUTIVE SESSION: RETURN TO OPEN SESSION: ADJOURNMENT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 21,2006 Councilmember Erickson moved to accept the Consent Agenda, to include: 1.) City Council Minutes of March 7,2006 special and regular meeting; 2.) Expenditure List - February 25- March 10,2006 -$876,518.47; 3.) Amend Contract: Curbside Recycling and Yard Waste Collections; 4.) Solid Waste Rate Adjustment - Set Public Hearing for April 6, 2006; 5.) Pool Presentation - Set Special Meeting for April 11, 2006 at 6:00 p.m.; 6.) Wholesale Water Contract Extension; 7.) Travel Requestfor WWTP Supervisor; 8.) Equipment Purchase - Truck Service Beds; 9.) Equipment Purchase - Light Duty Vehicles; 10.) Erickson Park Skate Park Improvements; 11.) Federal Transportation Enhancement Program Grant; 12.) Fund 109, Teen Help. Councilmember Williams seconded the motion and, following brief discussion, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously. Manager Madsen reminded the Council that the School District, in conjunction with the Lower Elwha Tribe, will hold a Potlatch on Thursday, March 23,2006. All Councilmembers are invited to. attend. Mayor Rogers adjourned the meeting to Executive Session for approximately one-half hour to discuss with legal counsel potential litigation under the authority of RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i). No action is expected to be taken. The Executive Session convened at 11:30 p.m. and, at 12:00 a..m., it was extended for an additional 15 minutes by announcement of the Mayor. The Executive Session concluded at 12: 15 a.m., and the Council convened in regular open session. No action was taken. The meeting was adjourned at 12:15 a.m. Karen A. Rogers, Mayor Becky J. Upton, City Clerk L-9 -9- ---~~ . . . L - 10 . Vendor BARCO PRODUCTS COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS EMPIRE SERVICES Anna Shimko Bruce Swenson Celebrate Your Life Foundation Eric Caynak Gay Meyers Leslie Campbell Ronnie Secondez Sonja Elwood Tamara Arnold RECREONICS INCORPORATED . TURBOFLARE USA WA STATE PATROL COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC PENINSULA AWARDS & TROPHIES SAFEWAY INC Legislative AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC . QWEST City Manager Department :'ii- Y..,_ '.:.... Date: 3/28/2006 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Description Account Number Invoice Amount BENCHES & PIC TABLE 001-0000-237.00-00 -220.62 Manuals 001-0000-237.00-00 -8.30 Rope for hitches 001-0000-237.00-00 -4.07 Training videos 001-0000-237.00-00 -4.47 Eraser Pads 001-0000-237.00-00 -10.64 Person Searches 001-0000-237.00-00 -1.85 Patrol Sling 001-0000-237.00-00 -62.13 Compact Disc 001-0000-237.00-00 -13.28 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-0000-237.00-00 -81.95 RFD DEP 001-0000-239.10-00 50.00 DEP RFD 001-0000-239.10-00 150.00 DEP REF 001-0000-239.10-00 150.00 DEP RFD 001-0000-239.10-00 150.00 DEP RFD 001-0000-239.10-00 150.00 CC DEP RFD 001-0000-239.10-00 50.00 DEP RFD 001-0000-239.10-00 150.00 DEP RFD 001-0000-239.10-00 50.00 DEP RFD LO .001-0000-239.10-00 50.00 EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV 001-0000-237.00-00 -62.95 8 Red SOS Units 001-0000-237.00-00 -472.59 WSP FP SUBMITS JAN 06 001-0000-229.50-00 338.00 L1VESCAN SUBMITTALS FEB06 001-0000-229.50-00 215.00 Division Total: $560.15 Department Total: $560.15. I Business lunch-KR,LW 001-1160-511.43-10 33.51 Business cards-Braun 001-1160-511.31-01 46.31 NAME PLATE-HEADRICK 001-1160-511.31-01 8.96 COUNCIL REFRESHMENTS 001-1160-511.31-01 14.97 Council refreshments 001-1160-511.31-01 14.07 COUNCIL REFRESHMENTS 001-1160-511.31-01 14.97 Mayor & Council Division Total: $132.79 Legislative Department Total: $132.79 PAPER & PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 001-1210-513.31-01 66.15 Letterhead paper 001-1210-513.31-01 92.81 CCOUNCIL RETREAT 001-1210-513.31-01 88.52 CC RETREAT 001-1210-513.31-01 4.09 COPIER PAPER 001-1210-513.31-01 55.31 CHAIR REPAIR 1/3 001-1210-513.48-10 64.98 CHAIR REPAIR 2/3 001-1210-513.48-10 75.81 CHAIR REPAIR 3/3 001-1210-513.48-10 32.49 03-14 ale 3604570411199B 001-1210-513.42-10 95.72 City Manager Office Division Total: $575.88 L - 1J Page 1 City of Port Angeles Dale: 3/28/2006 City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount . DESIGN ONE INC Restock fee-6 Icebergs 001-1211-513.31-01 226.37 PA DOWNTOWN ASSN Service Awards-DT Dollars 001-1211-513.31-01 600.00 Downtown Dollars-C in Act 001-1211-513.31-01 500.00 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC Certificates-Svce Awards 001-1211-513.31-01 1,525.00 City Manager Department Customer Commitment Division Total: $2,851.37 charlotte sellin SOFTWARE REIMBURSEMENT 001-1220-516.31-01 21.65 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC ENVELOPES, FOLDERS, PENS 001-1220-516.31-01 52.32 ENVELOPES,CUSTOMST AMP 001-1220-516.31-01 52.85 QWEST 03-14 a/c 3604570411199B 001-1220-516.42-10 95.72 City Manager Department Human Resources Division Total: $222.54 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Airfare-Upton 001-1230-514.43-10 173.60 QWEST 03-14 a/c 3604570411199B 001-1230-514.42-10 47.86 City Manager Department City Clerk Division Total: $221.46 City Manager Department Department Total: $3,871.25 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Perf Measure Conf- YZ 001-2010-514.43-10 295.00 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2010-514.31-01 5.50 QWEST 03-14 a/c 3604570411199B 001-2010-514.42-10 95.72 Finance Department Finance Administration Division Total: $396.22 MICROFLEX INC TAX AUDIT PROGRAM 001-2023-514.41-50 17.70 OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC WINDOW ENVELOPES 001-2023-514.31-01 267.85 . OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2023-514.31-01 99.89 OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS 001-2023-514.31-01 87.72 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2023-514.31-01 107.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2023-514.31-01 200.36 PENINSULA AWARDS & TROPHIES NAME PLATE-CLARK 001-2023-514.31-01 8.95 QWEST 03-14 a/c 3604570411199B 001-2023-514.42-10 119.65 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Shipping charges-Feb 001-2023-514.42-10 19.23 Finance Department Accounting Division Total: $928.56 APEX CREDIT BUREAU Membership Dues 2006 001-2025-514.41-50 48.50 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Toner Cartridge 001-2025-514.31-01 179.16 Toner Cartridge 001-2025-514.31-01 179.16 DATA BAR INCORPORATED CYCLES 1-5 3/9/06 001-2025-514.41-50 1,733.47 CYCLES 6-10 3/16/06 001-2025-514.41-50 2,173.30 EXPRESS PERSONNEL SERVICES ON CALL SERVICES 001-2025-514.41-50 972.37 ON CALL SERVICES 001-2025-514.41-50 779.94 Don Draz REIMB CLOTH ALLOWANCE 001-2025-514.31-11 74.73 OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC WINDOW ENVELOPES 001-2025-514.31-01 624.98 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2025-514.31-01 20.78 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2025-514.31-01 5.42 PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Flashlight bulbs-Droz 001-2025-514.31-80 2.68 QWEST 03-14 a/c 3604570411199B 001-2025-514.42-10 287.16 . RADIX CORPORATION MAINTENANCE APR 06 001-2025-514.48-10 192.77 L - 12 Page 2 Date: 3/28/2006 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 . Vendor VERIZON WIRELESS Finance Department DIGITAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC MORNINGSIDE OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC PITNEY BOWES UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Finance Department COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS DIGITAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC QWEST WEST GROUP Attorney CITY OF FORKS CLALLAM CNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT . Attorney CALLIS AND ASSOCIATES INC COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS DIGITAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC QWEST WASHINGTON (DOL), STATE OF WEST GROUP Attorney OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC PENINSULA DAILY NEWS . Description 03-09 a/c 47024274400001 Customer Service OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS LEASE JAN-MARCH 06 Shipping charges-Feb Reprographics Finance Department Eraser Pads OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS LABELS & ENVELOPES HP TONER CARTRIDGE 03-14 a/c 3604570411199B ONLINE LEGAL RESEARCH-FEB Attorney Office FEB 2006 JAIL BILL FEB. 2006 JAIL BILL Jail Contributions FELTON NOTARY PREMIUM Dictaphone ear piece OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS INDEX TABS HP TONER CARTRIDGE 03-14 a/c 3604570411199B NOTARY RENEWAL-FELTON ONLINE LEGAL RESEARCH-FEB Account Number 001-2025-514.42-10 Division Total: 001-2080-514.45-30 001-2080-514.45-30 001-2080-514.41-50 001-2080-514.31-01 001-2080-514.45-30 001-2080-514.42-10 Division Total: Department Total: 001-3010-515.31-01 001-3010-515.45-30 001-3010-515.31-01 001-3010-515.31-01 001-3010-515.42-10 001-3010-515.31-01 Division Total: 001-3012-598.51-23 001-3012-598.51-23 Division Total: 001-3021-515.49-01 001-3021-515.31-01 001-3021-515.45-30 001-3021-515.31-01 001-3021-515.31-01 001-3021-515.42-10 001-3021-515.49-01 001-3021-515.31-01 Invoice Amount 60.63 $7,335.05 497.43 1,848.38 855.00 288.61 1,254.05 49.00 $4,792.47 $13,452.30 138.81 28.39 49.46 107.21 119.65 247.60 $691.12 1,980.00 15,105.24 $17,085.24 50.00 31.52 28.39 8.28 129.95 47.86 30.00 247.60 $573.60 $18,349.96 46.32 1.19 21.85 20.90 55.10 50.35 56.05 33.25 36.10 44.65 38.00 41.80 Prosecution Division Total: Attorney Department Total: BUSINESS CARDS-JOHNS 001-4010-558.31-01 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-4010-558.31-01 ORD 3234 001-4010-558.44-10 ORD3236 001-4010-558.44-10 COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 Page 3 L - 13 Date: 3/28/2006 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount . PENINSULA DAILY NEWS... Ralston Rezone 001-4010-558.44-10 37.05 QWEST 03-14 ale 36045704111998 001-4010-558.42-10 95.72 WCPDA f'l'JA CITY PLAN DIR ASSN)' WCPDA DUES 001-4010-558.49-01 50.00 Community Deve/opmt Dept Planning Division Total: $628.33 DIGITAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS 001-4020-524.45-30 45.42 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-4020-524.31-01 43.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-4020-524.31-01 40.39 PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER ICC Mtg Dinner-Lierly 001-4020-524.43-10 25.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 03-06 ale 26470706000001 001-4020-524.42-10 32.31 Community Deve/opmtDept Building Division Total: $186.99 Community Deve/opmt Dept Department Total: $815.32 DIGITAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS 001-5010-521.45-30 12.37 ORBIT ONE COMMUNICATIONS 02-28 ale 10428.28 001-5010-521.42-10 36.95 QWEST 03-14 ale 36045704111998 001-5010-521.42-10 167.51 RED LION HOTEL-PORT ANGELES DEPT8ANQUETEMPSDNR 001-5010-521.31-01 822.75 Police Department Administration Division Total: $1,039.58 ANGELES MINI STORAGE A-58 1 YR RENT A58 STORAGE 001-5021-521.41-50 1,425.00 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Person Searches 001-5021-521.42-10 24.10 Airfare-Riepe, Coyle 001-5021-521.43-10 823.40 QWEST 03-14 ale 36045704111998 001-5021-521.42-10 23.93 . Police Department Investigation Division Total: $2,296.43 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-5022-521.20-80 216.26 CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-5022-521.20-80 110.70 CAPTAIN T'S CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-5022-521.20-80 172.18 CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-5022-521.20-80 621.48 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Patrol Sling 001-5022-521.31-01 810.63 Career Fair Registration 001-5022-521.42-10 50.00 Instructor CertClass 001-5022-521.43-10 895.00 EASTERN WASHINGTON HAY & UHAUL LAM8/RICE 4 ARCO&KILO 001-5022-521.49-80 107.18 EVERGREEN TOWING AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT & SUP 001-5022-521.41-50 133.21 AUTO MAJOR TRANSPORTATION 001-5022-521.49-90 133.21 GALLS INCORPORATED POLICE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 001-5022-521.49-90 59.11 POLICE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 001-5022 -521.49-90 34.64 IPICD INC IPICD FEE 4 MATERIALS GS 001-5022-521.43-10 25.00 Jim Baertschiger J8 UNIFORM SHOES 001-5022-521.20-80 113.66 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5022-521.31-01 1.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5022-521.31-01 19.47 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5022-521.31-01 318.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5022-521.31-01 4.54 PENINSULA BOTTLING CO INC 1 YR MACHINE RENT 4 RANGE 001-5022-521.31-80 132.00 TURBOFLARE USA 8 Red SOS Units 001-5022-521.31-01 6,166.35 . WASHINGTON-NAFTO NAFTO CONFERENCE TK 001-5022-521.43-10 140.00 L - 14 Page 4 Date: 3/28/2006 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 . Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount WASHINGTON-NAFTO... NAFTO CONF 06 PAPD216 001-5022-521.43-10 140.00 Police Department Patrol Division Total: $10,404.60 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5026-521.31-01 31.19 Police Department Reserves & Volunteers Division Total: $31.19 DIGITAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS 001-5029-521.45-30 111.26 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS 001-5029-521.31-01 175.45 QWEST 03-14 ale 3604570411199B 001-5029-521.42-10 119.65 Police Department Records Division Total: $406.36 Police Department Department Total: $14,178.16 DIGITAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS 001-6010-522.45-30 73.18 LIGHTHOUSE UNIFORM UNIFORM 001-6010-522.20-80 226.03 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC SUPPLIES 001-6010-522.31-01 17.02 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC LIBRARY SERVICES(EXCL 908 001-6010-522.31-01 22.74 LIBRARY SERVICES(EXCL 908 001-6010-522.31-01 10.56 LIBRARY SERVICES(EXCL 908 001-6010-522.31-01 35.74 PORT ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FRAME 001-6010-522.31-01 7.57 QWEST 03-14 ale 3604570411199B 001-6010-522.42-10 119.65 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Shipping eharges-Feb 001-6010-522.42-10 3.92 Fire Department Administration Division Total: $516.41 . CAPTAIN rs UNIFORM 001-6020-522.20-80 805.45 , COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Rope for hitches 001-6020-522.31-12 53.07 PORT ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT PARTS BUNKER DRYER 001-6020-522.31-01 4.18 WAX PAPER 001-6020-522.31-01 1.61 QWEST 03-14 ale 3604570411199B 001-6020-522.42-10 71.79 SEAWESTERN INC CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-6020-522.20-80 798.00 CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-6020-522.31-11 216.36 CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-6020-522.31-11 1,220.19 CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-6020-522.31-11 2,600.15 SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE MACHINERY & HEAVY HRDWARE 001-6020-522.31-01 4.33 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC PLASTICS 001-6020-522.31-01 12.86 Fire Department Fire Supression Division Total: $5,787.99 METROCALL 02-28 ale 03628583 001-6021-522.42-10 7.89 Fire Department Fire Volunteers Division Total: $7.89 COPY CAT GRAPHICS SIGNS (LIFE SAFETY SYSTEM 001-6030-522.31-01 216.60 QWEST 03-14 ale 3604570411199B 001-6030-522.42-10 23.93 Fire Department Fire Prevention Division Total: $240.53 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Class refreshments 001-6040-522.31-01 73.73 Business lunch for 3 001-6040-522.43-10 35.87 Conference breakfast 001-6040-522.43-10 7.15 . PORT ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT REFRESHMENTS -- PM REFRES 001-6040-522.31 ~01 60.91 PUGET SOUND MARINE ANNUAL DUES 001-6040-522.49-01 250.00 - Fire Department Fire Training Division Total: $427.66 MRS' CLEAN BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 001-6050-522.41-50 350.00 L - 15 Page 5 ------ --- ---.-- City of Port Angeles Date: 3/28/2006 City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount . PORT ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-6050-522.31-01 7.57 Fire Department Facilities Maintenance Division Total: $357.57 ORBIT ONE COMMUNICATIONS 02-28 alc 10434.24 001-6060-525.42-10 36.95 Fire Department Emergency Management Division Total: $36.95 Fire Department Department Total: $7,375.00 AGREEMENT DYNAMICS INC Consulting svcs 001-7010-532.41-50 300.00 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Print Cartridges 001-7010-532.31-01 158.83 Conf Reg-Puntenney 001-7010-532.43-10 360.00 Compact Disc 001-7010-532.49-01 173.28 DIETERICH POST CO SUPPLIES 001-7010-594.64-10 6,952.32 DIGITAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS 001-7010-532.45-30 28.07 OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC #10 ENVELOPES 001-7010-532.31-01 145.39 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS 001-7010-532.31-01 43.86 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC 24 X 36 8LUE PRINT PAPER 001-7010-532.31-01 162.45 PACIFIC OFFICE FURNITURE CHAIR REPAIR 001-7010-532.48-10 64.98 QWEST 03-05 AlC 36045201409458 001-7010-532.42-10 40.72 03-14 alc 36045704111998 001-7010-532.42-10 670.01 SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE STOPISLOW PADDLES 001-7010-532.35-01 54.65 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR FE8RUARY UG LOCATES 001-7010-532.41-50 29.90 Public Works-Gen Fnd Administration Division Total: $9,184.46 . Public Works-Gen Fnd Department Total: $9,184.46 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Manuals 001-8010-574.31-01 108.30 CSN SUPPLY V8MCC CHAIRS 001-801 0-574.31-80 2,386.65 North Olympic Building Assoc. RFD 8ANNER 001-8010-347.90-15 60.00 Mike Whitaker AIRFARE-DEP DIR INTERVIEW 001-8010-574.43-10 250.00 Steven R. Corry AIRFARE-DEP DIR INTERVIEW 001-8010-574.43-10 250.00 PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Office supplies-M8 001-8010-574.31-01 19.47 QWEST 03-14 ale 36045704111998 001-8010-574.42-10 71.79 Parks & Recreation Administration Division Total: $3,146.21 QWEST 03-14 ale 36045704111998 001-8011-574.42-10 47.86 Parks & Recreation Recreation Division Total: $47.86 AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY Xerocopy bond paper 001-8012-555.31-01 118.30 DIGITAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS 001-8012-555.45-30 41.54 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC Name tags and plates 001-8012-555.31-01 4.60 Toner cartridges 001-8012-555.31-01 88.48 Toner cartridges 001-8012-555.31-01 83.39 Copies-Full Sve Letter 001-8012-555.31-01 1,442.56 Cable 001-8012-555.31-01 9.74 Toner cartridges 001-8012 -555.31-01 75.81 PENINSULA DAILY NEWS SR GAMES AD-PRIME TIME 001-8012-555.31-01 174.60 . NOTICE RE: MEDICARE 8US 001-8012-555.44-10 23.14 QWEST 03-14 ale 36045704111998 001-8012-555.42-10 71.79 L - 16 Page 6 "'r ~"'o _0<, ..'." .~.J\...,. ~ ...~ Dale: 3/28/2006 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 . Vendor QWEST... Parks & Recreation FSH COMMUNICATIONS LLC QWEST Parks & Recreation BAXTER AUTO PARTS #15 BLAKE SAND & GRAVEL INC OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC QWEST VERIZON WIRELESS Parks & Recreation AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY . ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO BLAKE SAND & GRAVEL INC BRIM TRACTOR COMPANY INC COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS . COMMERCIAL ELECTRONICS EMPIRE SERVICES KEYRIFFIC KEYS CORP LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP METROCALL Sonja Elwood Claudia D. Stromski NORTHWEST FENCE CO NO~THWEST RECREATION OF WA Description 03-02 AlC 3604171942413B 03-05 AlC 3604524285819B 03-14 AIC 3604577004947B Account Number 001-8012-555.42-10 001-8012-555.42-10 001-8012-555.42-10 Invoice Amount 43.60 39.36 38.13 $2,255.04 50.00 23.93 39.90 $113.83 64.44 69.04 24.46 30.12 23.93 56.73 $268.72 140.98 473.25 680.67 473.25 161.87 133.43 77.26 187.97 259.93 22.54 62.01 17.33 44.40 177.61 44.40 982.79 58.37 392.00 100.18 1,069.20 5.95 36.60 99.98 120.00 64.95 68.77 2,154.09 Senior Center Division Total: Pool Phone Booth 001-8020-576.42-10 03-14 ale 3604570411199B 001-8020-576.42-10 03-14 AlC 3604570241950B 001-8020-576.42-10 William Shore Pool Division Total: PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8050-536.31-20 SEED,SOD,SOIL&INOCULANT 001-8050-536.31-20 PAPER (OFFICE,PRINT SHOP) 001-8050-536.31-01 OFFICE SUPPLlES,PAPER/RIB 001-8050-536.31-01 03-14 ale 3604570411199B 001-8050-536.42-10 02-28 ale 57043720500001 001-8050-536.42-10 Ocean View Cemetery Division Total: JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 WATER&SEWER TREATING CHEf\001-8080-576.31-20 CHEM RAW MATERIALS MFG 001-8080-576.31-20 WATER&SEWER TREATING CHEf\001-8080-576.31-20 WATER&SEWER TREATING CHEf\001-8080-576.31-20 LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576:31-20 LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20 LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20 LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20 HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWE~001-8080-576.31-20 NURSERY STOCK & SUPPLIES 001;'8080-576.31-40 NURSERY STOCK & SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-40 NURSERY STOCK & SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-40 LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20 Training videos 001-8080-576.43-10 Reg,Dues-Keohokalole 001-8080-576.43-10 TELEVISION EQUIP & ACESS 001-8080-576.31-20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20 FENCING 001-8080-576.31-20 03-07 AlC 03584067 001-8080-576.42-10 RENT RFD 001-8080-347.30-18 OFFICE & JANITORIAL SUPPL 001-8080-576.31-01 FENCING 001-8080-576.31-20 PARK,PLAYGROUND,REC EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20 L - 17 Page 7 Date: 3/28/2006 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount . OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-8080-576.31-01 20.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-8080-576.31-01 7.53 PARKER PAINT MFG CO INC PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8080-576.31-20 98.80 PENINSULA DAILY NEWS Seasonal Laborer 001-8080-576.44-10 83.56 PORT ANGELES POWER EQUIPMENT LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20 55.91 QWEST 03-14 ale 3604570411199B 001-8080-576.42-10 23.93 RECREONICS INCORPORATED EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV 001-8080-576.31-20 821.33 RESTAURANT APPLIANCE SVC INC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 147.56 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 78.05 STEUBER DISTRIBUTING INC HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-40 65.36 NURSERY STOCK & SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-40 98.73 POISONS:AGRICUL & INDUSTR 001-8080-576.31-40 1,248.36 SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20 129.03 PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-576.31-20 102.42 FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 001-8080-576.31-20 15.50 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC BRUSHES (NOT CLASSIFIED) 001-8080-576.31-20 11.28 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20 45.28 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20 16.83 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20 104.54 HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF001-8080-576.31-20 33.77 . HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF001-8080-576.35-01 119.38 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 001-8080-576.41-50 604.41 Parks & Recreation Park Facilities Division Total: $12,041.92 Parks & Recreation Department Total: $17,873.58 ALL WEATHER HEATING & COOLING AIR CONDITIONING & HEATNG 001-8130-518.48-10 579.41 AM SAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8130-518.31-20 138.94 PLASTICS 001-8130-518.31-20 538.20 PAPER & PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 001-8130-518.31-20 93.12 PAPER & PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 001-8130-518.31-20 93.12 PLASTICS 001-8130-518.31-20 134.29 PLASTICS 001-8130-518.31-20 134.29 ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8130-518.31-20 8.95 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8130-518.31-20 6.84 HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC AIR CONDITIONING & HEATNG 001-8130-518.31-20 20.09 ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY INC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8130-518.41-50 57.40 PACIFIC OFFICE FURNITURE 21 Chair pumps 001-8130-518.31-80 1,137.15 PARKER PAINT MFG CO INC PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8130-518.31-20 34.80 STRAIT MUSIC RENTAULEASE EQUIPMENT 001-8130-518.31-20 82.31 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8130-518.31-20 25.43 Parks & Rec-Maintenance Custodial/Janitorial Svcs Division Total: $3,084.34 . Parks & Rec-Maintenance Department Total: $3,084.34 General Fund Fund Total: $88,877.31 L - 18 Page 8 Date: 3/28/2006 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 . Vendor PORT ANGELES CHAMBER OF COMM Convention Center COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC IMSA NORTHWEST SECTION . LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP Claudia D. Stromski PORT ANGELES POWER EQUIPMENT QWEST ROB MERRITT SALES SAFETY & SUPPLY COMPANY SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC . TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPLY CO VERIZON WIRELESS Public Works-Street Account Number 101-1430-557.50-83 Division Total: Department Total: Fund Total: 102-0000-237.00-00 Division Total: Department Total: HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.31-20 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.31-20 LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 102-7230-542.31-20 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,TRA 102-7230-542.31-20 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.31-20 LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 102-7230-542.31-20 Means Square Ft Costs 102-7230-542.31-01 Registrations- TK,lMe 102-7230-542.43-10 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.48-10 FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 102-7230-542.31-25 2006 DUES-20034 WELLS 102-7230-542.43-10 2006 DUES 70197 -MCCALEB 102-7230-542.43-10 METALS,BARS,PLATES,RODS 102-7230-542.31-20 METALS,BARS,PLATES,RODS 102-7230-542.48-10 OFFICE & JANITORIAL SUPPL 102-7230-542.31-01 LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 102-7230-542.31-20 03-14 ale 3604570411199B 102-7230-542.42-10 CLOTHING & APPAREL 102-7230-542.48-10 FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 102-7230-542.31-20 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.31-20 HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWE~ 102-7230-542.31-20 HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWE~102-7230-542.31-20 HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWH 102-7230-542.31-20 FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 102-7230-542.31-20 PIPE FITTINGS 102-7230-542.31-20 HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWE~ 102-7230-542.31-20 LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 102-7230-542.31-25 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.31-25 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.48-10 HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWE~102-7230-542.48-10 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.31-20 HOSES, ALL KINDS 102-7230-542.31-20 MARKERS, PLAQUES,SIGNS 102-7230-542.31-25 03-06 ale 26470706000002 102-7230-542.42-10 Street Division Total: L - 19 Invoice Amount 3,778.54 $3,778.54 $3,778.54 $3,778.54 -12.25 -$12.25 -$12.25 6.03 28.27 60.85 150.28 8.69 24.91 159.86 160.00 13.16 3.45 50.00 50.00 60.56 579.03 64.95 10.72 71.79 144.04 53.63 72.73 73.87 29.20 81 .45 31.09 206.43 49.62 16.45 1.16 21.62 57.17 44.86 38.78 79.85 86.39 $2,590.89 Description 2006 MKTG CONTRACT Convention Center Convention Center Convention Center Fund Means Square Ft Costs Page 9 Date: 3/28/2006 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Vendor . QWEST Economic Development APCO INTERNATIONAL CAPTAIN T'S CENTURYTEL COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC ORBIT ONE COMMUNICATIONS PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC . PENINSULA DAILY NEWS QWEST Pen com SERENITY HOUSE CLALLAM TITLE CO PA Housing Rehabilitation HOLLOWAY, MICHAEL KETCHUM III, JOHN W PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC RAMSEY, SCOTT Account Number Department Total: Fund Total: 103-1511-558.42-10 Division Total: Department Total: Fund Total: 107 -5160-528.49-01 107-5160-528.20-80 107 -5160-528.20-80 107-5160-528.42-11 107-5160-528.42-11 107-5160-528.42-11 107 -5160-528.35-01 107-5160-528.42-11 107 -5160-528.31-01 107-5160-528.31-01 107-5160-528.42-10 107 -5160-528.48-10 107-5160-528.48-10 107 -5160-528.48-10 107 -5160-528.49-90 107 -5160-528.42-10 107-5160-528.42-10 107-5160-528.42-11 Division Total: Department Total: Fund Total: 109-0000-288.20-00 Division Total: Department Total: PA Teen Help Fund Total: HR RECONVEYANCE FEES 172-2310-559.49-41 PA Housing Rehabilitation Division Total: PA Housing Rehabilitation Department Total: PA Housing Rehab proj Fund Total: REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8221-574.41-50 REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8221-574.41-50 REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8221-574.41-50 REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8221-574.41-50 COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC. 174-8221-574.31-01 REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8221-574.41-50 Invoice Amount $2,590.89 $2,578.64 23.93 $23.93 $23.93 $23.93 62.00 101.40 202.10 96.98 85.79 258.04 144.26 34.36 87.72 12.75 36.95 4.87 26.99 29.24 182.20 406.81 57.40 5,719.36 $7,549.22 $7,549.22 $7,549.22 3,840.61 $3,840.61 $3,840.61 $3,840.61 219.00 $219.00 $219.00 $219.00 340.00 240.00 160.00 260.00 140.79 180.00 . Description Public Works-Street Street Fund 03-14 ale 36045704111998 Economic Development Economic Development Economic Development MS APCO DUES 2006 CLOTHING & APPAREL CLOTHING & APPAREL 03-06 ale 300509854 03-06 ale 300539444 03-06 ale 300496579 Headset parts Interpretation sves . OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 02-28 ale 10426.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL AD COMM OFCR PEN COM 03-14 ale 36045704111998 02-23 ale 206T4119188738 03-02 AlC 360Z020380301 8 Pen com Pencom Pen com Fund PA TEEN HELP L - 20 . Page 10 Date: 3/28/2006 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 . Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount RAMSEY, SCOlT... REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8221-574.41-50 300.00 ROONEY, RANDY L REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8221-574.41-50 300.00 REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8221-574.41-50 340.00 STEWART, JULIE A REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8221-574.41-50 100.00 REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8221-574.41-50 20.00 STEWART, PETER ALLAN REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8221-574.41-50 100.00 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC ART EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES 174-8221-574.31-01 10.20 Recreation Activities Sports Programs Division Total: $2,490.99 ANDERSON, KYLE D REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 120.00 CORNELL, CHRISTOPHER S REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 200.00 DRAKE'S PIZZA & SUBS FOODS: PERISHABLE 174-8222-574.31-01 88.85 HALBERG, JAMES G REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 160.00 HELPENSTELL, BROOKE SCOREKEEPER PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 140.00 KETCHUM III, JOHN W REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 120.00 KNOWLES, JAY SCOREKEEPER PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 130.00 LEINART, TOM REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 240.00 MCHONE, RANDY REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 200.00 NAPIONTEK, SHELBY SCOREKEEPER PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 140.00 PENINSULA TRAILS COALITION WEB DEVELOP 174-8222-574.31-01 750.00 . RAMSEY, SCOlT REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 220.00 ROONEY, RANDY L REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 200.00 STONE, RICHARD REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 100.00 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Shipping charges-Feb 174-8222-574.31-01 6.27 WILSON, DONALD L REFEREE PAYMENT 174-8222-574.41-50 120.00 I Recreation Activities Special Events Division Total: $2,935.12 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Cash box 174-8224-574.31-01 56.30 PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Supplies-Dukes 174-8224-574.31-01 18.41 SAFEWAY INC SUPPLIES 174-8224-574.31-01 1.07 SUPPLIES 174-8224-574.31-01 22.83 Recreation Activities Youth/Family Programs Division Total: $98.61 Recreation Activities Department Total: $5,524.72 Park & Recreation Fund Fund Total: $5,524.72 BARCO PRODUCTS BENCHES & PIC TABLE 186-8576-367.11-00 2,878.62 Waterfront Trail Waterfront Trail Division Total: $2,878.62 Waterfront Trail Department Total: $2,878.62 Waterfront Trail Fund Total: $2,878.62 AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, II PIER REPAIR 310-7919-594.65-10 303,619.05 COSCO/FEDERAL FIRESAFETY INC ALARM INSPECTION 310-7919-594.48-10 499.81 Capital Projects-Pub Wks GF-Pub Wks Projects Division Total: $304,118.86 . DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE LANDFILL SLOPE AD 310-7930-595.65-10 333.45 EXEL TECH CONSULTING INC BLVD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 310-7930-595.41-50 2,002.85 GENTRY ARCHITECTURE DISCOVERY TRAIL WEST 310-7930-595.65-10 1,072.50 L - 21 Page 11 --- City of Port Angeles Dale: 3/28/2006 City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount . Capital Projects-Pub Wks GF-Street Projects Division Total: $3,408.80 Capital Projects-Pub Wks Department Total: $307,527.66 LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP STEEL 310-8985-594.65-10 126.17 Capital Proj-parks & Rec Misc Parks Projects Division Total: $126.17 Capital proj-parks & Rec Department Total: $126.17 Capital Improvement Fund Total: $307,653.83 EXELTECH CONSULTING INC 8TH ST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 328-7950-595.41-50 7,810.09 8TH ST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 328-7950-595.41-50 12,584.63 Capital Projects-Pub Wks 8th St Bridge Reconst Division Total: $20,394.72 Capital Projects-Pub Wks Department Total: $20,394.72 8th St Bridge Reconstr Fund Total: $20,394.72 PUMPTECH INC Release Retainage-Partial 329-0000-223.40-00 35,000.01 Division Total: $35,000.01 Department Total: $35,000.01 CH2M HILL INC ENGINEERING SERVICES 329-7188-594.41-50 1,477.01 Public Works-Electric Electric Projects Division Total: $1,477.01 Public Works-Electric Department Total: $1,477.01 CH2M HILL INC ENGINEERING SERVICES 329-7388-594.41-50 3,853.08 Public Works-Water Water Projects Division Total: $3,853.08 Public Works-Water Department Total: $3,853.08 . CH2M HILL INC ENGINEERING SERIVCES 329-7488-594.41-50 1,091.71 Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Wastewater Projects Division Total: $1,091.71 Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: $1,091.71 WUGA Fund Total: $41,421.81 BPA-POWER WIRES February Power Bill-EFT 401-0000-213.10-00 1,652,970.00 Feb Transmission-EFT 401-0000-213.10-00 207,681.00 GENERAL PACIFIC INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-0000-141.40-00 332.48 BACKES, MICHAEL OVERPAYMENT-804 E 10TH ST 401-0000-122.10-99 106.70 BRASTAD, JOSHUA UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 28.20 BRIDGES, DENISE OVERPAYMNT-2626 S FRANCIS 401-0000-122.10-99 54.81 CHURCH OF CHRIST OVERPAYMENT-224 N LIBERTY 401-0000-122.10-99 76.78 DEESE, TROY TAYLOR & MINNIE OVERPAYMENT-3803 CST 401-0000-122.10-99 141.35 EVERGREEN COURT APTS OVERPMT-2202 W 16TH B-8 401-0000-122.10-99 119.49 OVERPMT-2202 W 16TH C-1 401-0000-122.10-99 116.98 HINMAN, JAMES OVERPMT -1 ~ 2 W 1 ST ST #302 401-0000-122.10-99 27.44 LEINAAR, ANN OVERPAYMENT-401 E 7TH ST 401-0000-122.10-99 75.31 MUELLER, HOMER J OVERPMT-1308 E FRONT #9 401-0000-122.10-99 68.30 MUIR, CHRIS OVERPMT-213 1/2 W 3RD ST 401-0000-122.10-99 40.79 MULLER, WILLARD C OVERPMT-938 W 15TH ST #27 401-0000-122.10-99 38.61 O'BRIEN, KEVIN D OVERPMT-4024 NEWELL RD 16 401-0000-122.10-99 74.08 . PRIEST & ZIEGLER OVERPAYMENT-1127 E 1ST ST 401-0000-122.10-99 36.49 L - 22 Page 12 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Date: 3/28/2006 . Vendor PROPERTIES BY LANDMARK INC RA THFON, MIKE SWISHER, W A WILDWOOD TERRACE WINDERMERE (PORT ANGELES) YOUNG, DAVID PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER PENINSULA DAILY NEWS Public Works-Electric EES CONSULTING INC MARSH MUNDORF PRATT SULLIVAN Public Works-Electric AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY . BAXTER AUTO PARTS #15 BUSINESS ANSWERPHONE SERVICE DIGITAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC EMERALD RECYCLING JACO ANALYTICAL LABORATORY INC LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP George Drake Tod Eisele MORNINGSIDE NORTHWEST PUBLIC POWER ASSN OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER PORT ANGELES POWER EQUIPMENT . PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC QWEST Description Account Number OVERPAYMENT-1309 E 4TH ST 401-0000-122.10-99 OVERPMT-4016 NEWELL RD 32 401-0000-122.10-99 OVERPAYMENT-414 VASHON AV 401-0000-122.10-99 OVERPMT-934 LAURIDSEN 224 401-0000-122.10-99 OVRPMT-934 LAURIDSEN 215 401-0000-122.10-99 OVERPAYMENT-1717 DELORES 401-0000-122.10-99 OVERPMT-106 1/2 W 6TH ST 401-0000-122.10-99 Filing fees-Rinehart 401-0000-245.90-00 Division Total: Department Total: ELEC ENGINEERING MGR ELEC ENGINEERING MGR Engineering-Electric WPAG 2006 WPAG RATE CASE 2006 401-7111-533.44-10 401-7111-533.44-10 Division Total: 401-7120-533.49-01 401-7120-533.49-01 Invoice Amount 97.56 50.00 50.00 44.28 46.02 175.73 54.18 32.00 $1,862,538.58 $1,862,538.58 98.65 83.57 $182.22 1,295.92 950.01 $2,245.93 703.00 92.82 163.14 66.28 7.45 11.26 160.00 32.59 6.75 2,640.00 20.00 100.00 142.14 90.40 185.20 96.00 3,282.32 46.32 10.86 278.56 59.00 363.85 83.22 400.45 64.98 39.36 Power Resource Mgmt , Division Total: AD FOR LIGHT OPS MANAGER 401-7180-533.44-10 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 401-7180-533.31-20 PAPER & PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 401-7180-533.31-20 AUTO & TRUCK ACCESSORIES 401-7180-533.31-20 CLEANING COMPOSITION/SOLV 401-7180-533.48-10 ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 401-7180-533.42-10 OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS 401-7180-533.45-30 FUEL,OIL,GREASE. & LUBES 401-7180-533.48-10 ENVIRONMENT AL&ECOLOGICAL 401-7180-533.48-10 ENVIRONMENT AL&ECOLOGICAL 401-7180-533.48-10 ENVIRONMENTAL&ECOLOGICAL 401-7180-533.48-10 ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 REIMB VEHICLE MILEAGE 401-7180-533.43-10 RENEW L1CENSES,CLASSES 401-7180-533.43-10 BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 401-7180-533.48-10 CONSULTING SERVICES 401-7180-533.41-50 BUSINESS CARDS - OMAN 401-7180-533.31-01 OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS 401-7180-533.31-01 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 401-7180-533.35-01 Callout meals 401-7180-533.43-10 HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEJ;401-7180-533.35-01 EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV 401-7180-533.48-10 GASES CONT.EQUIP:LAB,WELD 401-7180-533.48-10 03-02 ale 206Z020411942B 401-7180-533.42-10 03-02 ale 3604178095336B 401-7180-533.42-10 L - 23 Page 13 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Date: 3/28/2006 Vendor QWEST... RADIOSHACK RED LION HOTEL-PORT ANGELES SIMMONS ELECTRICAL SERVICES SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC UNITED PARCEL SERVICE VERIZON WIRELESS Public Works-Electric COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS AIRPORT GARDEN CENTER AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN AM SAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS EDGE ANALYTICAL FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL FEI EVERETT 3023 GRCCIWW HEARTLlNE Claudia D. Stromski Description Account Number 03-14 ale 3604570411199B 401-7180-533.42-10 03-14 NC 3604574717777B 401-7180-533.42-10 ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401~7180-533.48-10 REAL PROPERTY,RENT/LEASE 401-7180-533.48-10 ENGINGEERING SERVICES 401-7180-533.48-10 SHIPPING AND HANDLING 401-7180-533.48-10 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 401-7180-533.31-20 FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 401-7180-533.31-20 PUMPS & ACCESSORIES 401-7180-533.48-10 PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 401-7180-533.48-10 PUMPS & ACCESSORIES 401-7180-533.48-10 HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF401-7180-533.35-01 Shipping charges-Feb 401-7180-533.42-10 03-04 ale 8702511030001 401-7180-533.42-10 03-04 a/c87025112400001 401-7180-533.42-10 03-12 ale 77025110300001 401-7180-533.42-10 03-12 ale 77025112400001 401-7180-533.42-10 Division Total: Department Total: Fund Total: 402-0000-237.00-00 Division Total: Department Total: FEED,SEDDING,VIT-ANIMALS 402-7380-534.34-02 SEED,SOD,SOIL&INOCULANT 402-7380-534.34-02 MEMBERSHIPS 402-7380-534.49-01 MEMBERSHIPS 402-7380-534.49-01 WATER&SEWER TREATING CHEr..402-7380-534.31-01 WATER&SEWER TREATING CHEr..402-7380-534.31-05 PAINTING EQUIPMENT & ACC 402-7380-534.31-20 LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 402-7380-534.34-02 PLASTICS 402-7380-534.34-02 Magnetic Locator 402-7380-534.35-01 Dues-Sperr 402-7380-534.49-01 TESTING&CALlBRA TION SERVI 402-7380-534.48-10 PLASTICS 402-7380-534.34-02 HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF402-7380-534.35-01 PIPE FITTINGS 402-7380-534.34-02 SAT 3504-072852 402-7380-534.43-10 BAT EXAM-RB-3504-072852 402-7380-534.49-01 AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 402-7380-534.31-20 OFFICE & JANITORIAL SUPPL 402-7380-534.31-01 L - 24 Electric Operations Public Works-Electric Electric Utility Fund Magnetic Locator . Invoice Amount 335.02 38.19 42.38 78.31 2,574.00 20.17 35.62 15.40 43.84 16.44 175.05 29.42 19.00 59.75 59.75 59.75 112.90 $12,860.94 $15,289.09 $1,877,827.67 -49.03 -$49.03 -$49.03 7.31 49.81 71.00 150.00 218.32 436.64 13.63 27.27 113.89 639.77 150.00 43.00 269.89 292.85 350.03 205.00 105.00 54.09 82.26 . . Page 14 . Vendor MORNINGSIDE NATIONAL SAFETY INC City of rort Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Date: 3/28/2006 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC PENINSULA TRUCK LINES QWEST RADIOSHACK SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC THURMAN SUPPLY . TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR WASHINGTON (DOH), STATE OF Public Works-Water COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS RACO MANUFACTURING & ENG CO AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY AMTEST INC . ANDERSON &SONS GRAVEL ANGELES ELECTRIC INC BLAKE SAND & GRAVEL INC Description Account Number BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 402-7380-534.48-10 FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 402-7380-534.31-20 CONCRETE & METAL CULVERTS 402-7380-534.34-02 COPYING MACHINE SUPPLIES 402-7380-534.31-01 EXTERNAL LABOR 402-7380-534.42-10 03-14 ale 3604570411199B 402-7380-534.42-10 03-10 ale 360Z1 00240955B 402-7380-534.42-10 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 402-7380-534.31-20 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 402-7380-534.31-20 HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEI'402-7380-534.35-01 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 402-7380-534.31-20 AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 402-7380-534.31-20 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 402-7380-534.34-02 ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 402-7380-534.34-02 HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 402-7380-534.31-20 HOSES, ALL KINDS 402-7380-534.31-20 PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 402-7380-534.34-02 ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 402-7380-534.31-20 HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEI'402-7380-534.34-02 PUMPS & ACCESSORIES 402-7380-534.34-02 TESTING&CALlBRA TION SERVI 402-7380-534.48-10 TESTING&CALlBRA TION SERVI 402-7380-534.48-10 TESTING&CALlBRA TION SERVI 402-7380-534.48-10 TESTING&CALlBRA TION SERVI 402-7380-534.48-10 TESTING&CALlBRA TION SERVI 402-7380-534.48-10 FEBRUARY UG LOCATES 402-7380-534.48-10 WATER SYS. OPER. FEE-06 402-7380-534.49-90 WATER SYS. CERT. FEE-06 402-7380-534.49-90 Water Division Total: Public Works-Water Department Total: Water Fund Fund Total: Laserjet Drum 403-0000-237.00-00 RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION 403-0000-237.00-00 Division Total: Department Total: JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-20 TESTING&CALlBRA TION SERVI 403-7480-535.41-50 TESTING&CALlBRA TION SERVI 403-7480-535.41-50 ROAD/HWY MAT NONASPHAL TIC 403-7480-535.31-20 EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV 403-7480-535.48-10 CLOTHING & APPAREL 403-7480-535.31-20 BRICKS & CLAY PRODUCTS 403-7480-535.31-20 L - 25 Invoice Amount 26.00 306.15 601.32 36.28 137.57 23.93 351.21 7.56 6.49 115.82 7.10 4.78 12.05 49.17 12.57 10.80 124.40 107.26 68.22 66.75 145.00 145.00 145.00 105.qO 20.00 14.95 5,455.10 536.00 $11,921.24 $11,921.24 $11,872.21 -7.85 -5.81 -$13.66 -$13.66 275.14 475.00 810.00 346.56 116.96 41.98 8.23 Page 15 Date: 3/28/2006 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount BLAKE SAND & GRAVEL INC... CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,TRA 403-7480-535.31-20 6.82 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Laserjet Drum 403-7480-535.31-01 102.46 DIGITAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS 403-7480-535.31-01 10.07 FEI EVERETT 3023 PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 21.22 PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 727.67 GRAINGER AIR CONDITIONING & HEATNG 403-7480-535.31-20 136.50 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC. 403-7480-535.31-01 535.00 KNIGHT FIRE PROTECTION INC PW CONSTRUCTION & RELATED 403-7480-535.31-20 197.38 LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-20 133.01 METROCALL 02-28 alc 03622727 403-7480-535.42-10 31.66 NAUTILUS ENVIRONMENTAL CLINICAL LAB REAGENTS TES 403-7480-535.41-50 3,200.00 OLYMPIC SPRINGS INC CUTLERY,DISHES GLASS ETC 403-7480-535.31-20 7.00 FOODS: PERISHABLE 403-7480-535.31-20 12.50 FOODS: PERISHABLE 403-7480-535.31-20 25.00 RENTAL OR LEASE SERVICES 403-7480-535.31-20 22.14 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 403-7480-535.31-01 7.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 403-7480-535.31-01 25.97 OPS SYSTEMS INC Registration-Richmond 403-7480-535.43-10 900.00 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC PAPER (OFFICE,PRINT SHOP) 403-7480-535.31-01 64.98 PARKER PAINT MFG CO INC PAINTING EQUIPMENT & ACC 403-7480-535.31-20 41.23 PAINTING EQUIPMENT & ACC 403-7480-535.31-20 13.65 PNCWA-OL YMPIC SECTION BRIAN RICHARDSON CLASS EN 403-7480-535.43-10 360.00 GARY RICHMOND CLASS ENROL 403-7480-535.43-10 360.00 6 EMPLOYEE DUES @$10.00EA 403-7480-535.49-01 60.00 PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Certified mail-Young 403-7480-535.42-10 19.35 Safety Lunch-Waldron 403-7480-535.43-10 24.87 QWEST 03-14 alc 3604570411199B 403-7480-535.42-10 47.86 03-02 NC 3604170591196B 403-7480-535.42 -10 37.19 03-02 NC 3604170190080B 403-7480-535.42-10 41.26 03-08 NC 3605650365696B 403-7480-535.42-10 37.19 RACO MANUFACTURING & ENG CO AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 403-7480-535.31-20 11.67 RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION 403-7480-535.31-20 64.14 RADIOSHACK SUPPLIES 403-7480-535;31-20 15.12 SANDERSON SAFETY SUPPLY CO LAB EQUIP,BIO,CHEM,ENVIR 403-7480-535.31-20 1,678.37 SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES INC Maintenance Inspection 403-7480-535.48-10 1,195.63 SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS 403-7480-535.31-20 4.46 PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 289.54 FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 403-7480-535.31-20 22.11 FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 403-7480-535.31-20 8.92 LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 403-7480-535.48-10 44.67 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 403-7480-535.31-01 19.21 HOSES, ALL KINDS 403-7480-535.31-20 10.69 L - 26 Page 16 . . . City of.Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Date: 3/28/2006 . Vendor SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC... UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR WA STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY WAYNE'S NURSERY WWCPA SECRETARY-TREASURER Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Claudia D. Stromski MORNINGSIDE OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER QWEST . SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE Public Works-Solid Waste ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO ANGELES PLUMBING INC BRUCH & BRUCH CONSTRUCTION.INC DEX MEDIA WEST EMERALD RECYCLING LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP Helen Freilich MORNINGSIDE OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC . PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC PEN PRINT INC PENINSULA DAILY NEWS Description SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES FEBRUARY UG LOCATES VOLUNTARY CLEANUP SW 0523 NURSERY STOCK & SUPPLIES EDUCATIONAL SERVICES Wastewater Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Wastewater Fund Account Number 403-7480-535.31-20 403-7480-535.31-20 403-7480-535.31-20 403-7480-535.31-20 403-7480-535.41-50 403-7480-535.49-90 403-7480-535.31-20 403-7480-535.43-10 Division Total: Department Total: Fund Total: OFFICE & JANITORIAL SUPPL 404-7580-537.31-01 BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 404-7580-537.48-10 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 404-7580-537.31-01 COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC. 404-7580-537.31-01 Tools-Stromski 404-7580-537.35-01 Business lunch-McCabe 404-7580-537.43-10 03-14 ale 3604570411199B 404-7580-537.42-10 FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 404-7580-537.31-20 PIPE FITTINGS 404-7580-537,31-20 FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 404-7580-537.31-20 PIPE FITTINGS 404-7580-537.31-20 AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 404-7580-537.35-01 Solid Waste-Collections Public Works-Solid Waste Solid Waste-Collections Division Total: Department Total: Fund Total: LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 405-7585-537.31-20 Lumber 405-7585-537.31-20 Lumber 405-7585-537.31-20 BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 405-7585-537.48-10 ROAD/HWY MAT NONASPHALTIC 405-7585-537.31-20 Balance due 405-7585-537.44-10 ENVIRONMENTAL&ECOLOGICAL 405-7585-537.48-10 EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV 405-7585-537.48-10 EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV 405-7585-537.48-10 BUILT GREEN CONFERENCE - 405-7585-537.43-10 BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 405-7585-537.48-10 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 405-7585-537.31-20 COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPF 405-7585-537.31-20 COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 405-7585-537.44-10 COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 405-7585-537.44-10 Recycle Ads-February 405-7585-537.44-10 L - 27 Invoice Amount 21.38 11.77 49.01 2.75 14.95 446.00 86.64 220.00 $13,500.76 $13,500.76 $13,487.10 144.45 19.00 17.27 92.59 40.06 19.70 119.65 10.07 19.96 8.01 3.47 71.20 $565.~3 $565.43 $565.43 94.94 -21.44 -25.18 150.27 1,049.43 3.80 96.75 1,299.60 1,299.60 95.00 47.00 20.75 42.24 129.96 496.01 162.00 Page 17 City of Port Angeles Date: 3/28/2006 City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount . QWEST 03-02 AlC 3604175035758B 405-7585-537.42-10 74.38 03-05 AlC 3604522245145B 405-7585-537.42-10 37.23 03-05 AlC 3604528100532B 405-7585-537.42-10 37.36 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC CLOTHING & APPAREL 405-7585-537.31-20 194.38 CLOTHING & APPAREL 405-7585-537.31-20 75.00 CLOTHING & APPAREL 405-7585-537.31-20 77.87 AIR CONDITIONING & HEATNG 405-7585-537.31-20 10.77 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Shipping eharges-Feb 405-7585-537.42-10 5.73 Public Works-Solid Waste Solid Waste-Landfill Division Total: $5,453.45 Public Works-Solid Waste Department Total: $5,453.45 Solid Waste-Landfill Fund Total: $5,453.45 CAPTAIN rs UNIFORM 409-6025-526.20-80 424.58 CORDERY, SHARON CPR CLASS 3/16 409-6025-526.31-08 50.00 GE HEAL THCARE SERVICES ENGINGEERING SERVICES 409-6025-526.41-50 54.15 ENGINGEERING SERVICES 409-6025-526.41-50 108.30 HANSEN, MIKE CPR CLASS 3/16 409-6025-526.31-08 50.00 LIFE ASSIST HOSP SURG ACCES & SUNDRIS 409-6025-526.31-01 290.35 FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 409-6025-526.31-08 134.91 MOROZ, JAMES CPR CLASS 3/13 & 3/14 409-6025-526.31-08 100.00 QWEST 03-14 ale 3604570411199B 409-6025-526.42-10 23.93 . SEAWESTERN INC CLOTHING & APPAREL 409-6025-526.20-80 322.00 SUNDIN, ERIK K FIRST AID CLASS 3/14 409-6025-526.31-08 100.00 Fire Department Medic I Division Total: $1,658.22 Fire Department Department Total: $1,658.22 Medic I Utility Fund Total: $1,658.22 ALL WEATHER HEATING & COOLING CITY REBATE-THOMPSON 421-7121-533.49-86 1,000.00 CITY REBATE-SHANK 421-7121-533.49-86 1,000.00 CITY REBATE-THOMAS 421-7121-533.49-86 1,000.00 EVERWARM HEARTH & HOME INC CITY REBATE-THOMPSON 421-7121-533.49-86 181.51 GLASS SERVICES CO INC CITY REBATE-DUNLAP 421-7121-533.49-86 656.53 CITY REBATE-RANKIN 421-7121-533.49-86 80.50 MATHEWS GLASS CO INC CITY REBATE-JAMES 421-7121-533.49-86 483.00 CITY REBATE-SOLLIE 421-7121-533.49-86 296.03 CITY REBATE-MANNING 421-7121-533.49-86 87.50 CITY REBATE-KALAPACA 421-7121-533.49-86 39.66 CITY REBATE-SELLON 421-7121-533.49-86 106.54 CITY REBATE-KIMBALL 421-7121-533.49-86 480.38 Anthony Rusin CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00 Clarence Lundstrom CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00 Jeff Owen CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 75.00 . Kimberly Springfield CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00 Maria Heikkila CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00 L - 28 Page 18 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Date: 3/28/2006 . Vendor Michael Sanders Richard Chandler Steve Johnson Willa Stephens Public Works~Electric ANGELES CONCRETE PRODUCTS Public Works-Electric PORS ATTY AT LAW, THOMAS M Public Works-Water BROWN AND CALDWELL GEOTIVITY INC . GRECOR CONSTRUCTION HOME SERVICE Public Works-WW/Stormwtr DELHUR INDUSTRIES INC Public Works-Solid Waste SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO BAXTER AUTO PARTS #15 CHEVRON USA . COPY CAT GRAPHICS DENVER'S TIRE CO INC Description CITY REBATE CITY REBATE CITY REBATE CITY REBATE CITY REBATE Conservation Loans Public Works-Electric Conservation Loans/Grants BUILDER'S SUPPLIES Electric Projects Public Works-Electric Electric Utility CIP PUD CONTRACT Water Projects Public Works-Water Water Utility CIP CSO PLAN UPDATE CSO SITE VERIFICATION REPLACE ANTENNA CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,HEA PARK ST CONCRETE Account Number 421-7121-533.49-86 421-7121-533.49-86 421-7121-533.49-86 421-7121-533.49-86 421-7121-533.49-86 Division Total: Department Total: Fund Total: 451-7188-594.34-03 Division Total: Department Total: Fund Total: 452-7388-594.41-50 Division Total: Department Total: Fund Total: 453-7 488~594.41-50 453-7488-594.48-10 453-7488-594.48-10 453-7488-594.65-10 453-7488-594.65-10 Wastewater Projects Division Total: Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: WasteWater Utility CIP Fund Total: PW CONSTRUCTION & RELATED 454-7588-594.65-10 Solid Waste Coli Projects Division Total: Public Works-Solid Waste Department Total: Solid Waste Utility CIP Fund Total: AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 Division Total: Department Total: PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS GAS PURCHASE GAS PURCHASE EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS L - 29 501-7630-548.31-20 501-7630-548.35-01 501-7630-548.35-01 501-7630-548.34-02 501-7630-548.32-10 501-7630-548.32-10 501-7630-548.34-02 501-7630-548.34-02 501-7630-548.34-02 Invoice Amount 50.00 75.00 175.00 175.00 50.00 $6,211.65 $6,211.65 $6,211.65 422.37 $422.37 $422.37 $422.37 72.00 $72.00 $72.00 $72.00 16,085.41 3,163.77 495.00 20,317.19 2,812.71 $42,874.08 .$42,874.08 $42,874.08 58,163.38 $58,163.38 $58,163.38 $58,163.38 42.00 65.10 $107.10 $107.10 61.84 33.12 81.51 32.12 22.95 19.02 557.75 28.16 92.06 Page 19 Date: 3/28/2006 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount . DENVER'S TIRE CO INC... EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 66.06 EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 28.16 EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 36.82 EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 9.75 GRAINGER AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 226.68 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT & SUP 501-7630-548.35-01 15.93 HEARTLlNE AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 29.19 AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 75.76 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 475.63 AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 94.51 Catherine McFadden EXPENSES-FLEET MGR INTRVW 501-7630-548.43-10 250.00 Donald J Walker FLEET MGR INTRVIEW TRAVEL 501-7630-548.43-10 250.00 MORNINGS IDE BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 501-7630-548.48-10 47.00 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 501-7630-548.31-01 45.23 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC RENTAULEASE EQUIPMENT 501-7630-548.31-01 146.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 501-7630-548.31-01 152.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 501-7630-548.31-01 74.71 OFFICE SUPPL Y,iNKS,LEADS 501-7630-548.31-01 11.89 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT & SUP 501-7630-548.31-01 38.19 PAPER & PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 501-7630-548.31-01 60.63 . HOSP SURG ACCES & SUNDRIS 501-7630-548.31-01 -38.19 QWEST 03-14 a/c 3604570411199B 501-7630-548.42-10 23.93 SEATTLE TIMES, THE COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 501-7630-548.44-10 216.00 SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 3.77 AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2.8,0 AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 7.86 AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 40.20 AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 26.77 EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 5.42 AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 0.67 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Shipping chg-Rollins 501-7630-548.42-10 35.72 SHIPPING AND HANDLING 501-7630-548.49-90 40.78 WCIA rNA CITIES INS AUTHORITY) UG TANK LIABILITY INS 501-7630-548.49-90 710.00 Public Works-Equip Svcs Equipment Services Division Total: $4,139.12 Public Works-Equip Svcs Department Total: $4,139.12 Equipment Services Fund Total: $4,246.22 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Print sever 502-0000-237.00-00 -4.48 Software 502-0000-237.00-00 -29.51 Credit 502-0000-237.00-00 4.48 USB Ports 502-0000-237.00-00 -2.07 . Print Head Replacement 502-0000-237.00-00 -4.07 Ethernet Adapter 502-0000-237.00-00 -0.89 L - 30 Page 20 L - 31 Page 21 Vendor CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE LEOFF OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PERS TEAMSTERS LOCAL 589 UNITED COLLECTIONS SERVICE INC UNITED WAY (PAYROLL) WSCFF/EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST Totals for check period City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report From: 3/11/2006 Description P/R Deductions pe 03-12 P/R Deductions pe 03-21 P/R Deductions pe 03-21 P/R Deductions pe 03-12 P/R Deductions pe 03-12 P/R Deductions pe 03-21 P/R Deductions pe 03-21 P/R Deductions pe 03-21 P/R Deductions pe 03-12 P/R Deductions pe 03-12 P/R Deductions pe 03-12 P/R Deductions pe 03-12 Payroll Clearing To: 3/24/2006 Account Number 920-0000-231.56-30 920-0000-231.51-20 920-0000-231.51-21 920-0000-231.56-20 920-0000-231.56-20 920-0000-231.51-10 920-0000-231.51-11 920-0000-231.51-12 920-0000-231.54-10 920-0000-231.56-30 920-0000-231.56-10 920-0000-231.53-20 Division Total: Department Total: Fund Total: From: 3/11/2006 To: 3/24/2006 L - 32 Page 22 Date: ;jlLtl/:lUUO Invoice Amount 628.00 6.74 16,243.74 169.85 1,052.76 2,482.94 4,845.68 12,199.97 2,780.50 12.83 297.00 1,575.00 $42,295.01 $42,295.01 $42,295.01 $2,558,575.95 . . . . DATE: To: FROM: SUBJECT: ~ORTANGELBS WASHINGTON, U.S.A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO April 4, 2006 CITY COUNCIL Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities.~~ Final Acceptance for Shane Park Drainage Project No. 05-14 Summary: Iddings, Inc., completed all work- associated with the project. The project has been inspected and accepted as complete. Final payment has been made. Recommendation: Accept the project as completed by Iddings, Inc., and authorize the release of the retainage in the amount of $7,690.85 upon receipt of the appropriate. clearances. . Background / Analysis: On March 7, 2006, Iddings Inc., completed the installation of the drainage improvements to Shane Park, including new sub-drains, new sprinkler system, placement of sports field sand and infield sand, and hydro-seeding the completed ball field. The original contract amount was $209,800.93, including tax, and there were four change orders. Change Order No.1 reduced contractor costs for a separate materials purchase ($110,574.30) that would be supplied by the City. Change Order No.2 paid for thereplacement of substandard soil and the construction of a new 2-inch water manifold. Change Order No.3 authorized the sifting and reuse of existing, rocky infield sand. Change Order No.4 authorized the import of additional play field sand and ~dditional sub-drains required to drain additional areas of the park. Original Change Adjusted Final Cost* Project Cost'Variance Contract Orders (4) Contract $209,800.93 <40,937.40> $166,583.81 $276,158.11 32% *Includes $110,574.30 of City provided materials. . It is recommended that Council accept the project as completed by Iddings, Inc., and authorize the release of the retainage in the amount of $7,690.85 upon receipt of the appropriate clearances. " N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Shane Park Drainage Project 05-14, Accept.doc L - 33 . . . L - 34 . . . pORWGELES WASHINGTON, U.S.A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO DATE: April 4, 2006 To: CITY COUNCIL FROM: Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities~ Final Acceptance for 2005 CSO Reduction Projects, Project No. 05-24 SUBJECT: Summary: Grecor Construction, Inc., comp~eted all work associated with the project. The project has been inspected and accepted as complete. Final payment has been processed. Releases have been requested from the appropriate state agencies. Recommendation: Accept the project as completed by Grecor Construction, Inc., and authorize the release of the retainage in the amount of $3,924.31 upon receipt of the a ro riate clearances. Background / Analysis: On March 10,2006, Grecor Construction, Inc., completed the installation of waterproof liners in the combined storm drain outlets on Railroad A venue - one at the intersection of Oak, and the other at the intersection of Laurel. The drain line repairs were successful in limiting saltwater backflow into the storm and wastewater collection systems. The original contract amount was $55,210.26, including tax, and there were three change orders. Change Order No. 1 was due to the uncovering of an abandoned oil tank and contaminated soils in the area of excavation. Change Order No.2 was required due to storm damage to the excavation caused by the January, 2006 stomts.'Change Order No.3 was due to failed concrete sidewalks caused by settlement of the unconsolidated fill material underlying the area. Original Contract Change Orders Adjusted Final Cost Cost Variance (3) Contract $55,210.26 $29,790.19 $85,000.45 $85,000.45 54% It is recommended that Council accept the project as completed by Grecor Construction, Inc., and authorize the release of the retainage in the amount of $3,924.31 upon receipt of the appropriate clearances. N:'CCOUNCI~\FINAL'CSO Reduction Projects, Project 05-24, Acce,Et.doc L - 30 . . . L - 36 . . . MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION Port Angeles, Washington 98362 February 22, 2006 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Leonard Rasmussen, Dave Johnson, Cherie Kidd, Candace Kalish, John Matthews, One Vacancy Members Excused: Kevin Snyder Staff Present: Nathan West, Scott Johns, Sue Roberds, Jim Mahlum Public Present: Ann Schlagel, Tyler Ahlgren, Steve Zenovic, Jack Powell, Bruce Bearne, Bob Leach, Jim Ciaciuch APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the February 8, 2006, minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Matthews and passed PUBLIC HEARINGS: SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - SMA 06-01 - NIPPON PAPER: Construction of a utility bridge in the shoreline. Priltcipal Plaltlter Nathalt West reviewed the Department's report recommending approval with conditions. Chair Rasmussen opened the public hearing. AItIt Schlagel, Nippon Paper Iltdustries, 1902 Marilte Drive represented the application. She identified that therewill'he no excavation in association with the proposed construction activity. She was in agreement with staffs recommendation and stated that the proposal is to replace an existing underground infrastructure above ground. Construction will not interfere with use of the right-of-way. There being no other comments, Chair Rasmussen closed the public hearing. Following comment that the proposed activity appears to be an upgrade ofthe current use, Commissioner Kalish moved to approve the shoreline substantial development permit as proposed citing the following conditions, findings, and conclusions: ' Conditions: 1. If the subject site has not been previously inventoried, evaluated, and reviewed to the satisfaction of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the subject site shall be evaluated by a cultural review team which shall include a professional archaeologist, a representative ofthe Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the site owner, and the Port Angeles Department of Community Development. This team shall determine the extent of excavation monitoring for the project during the permit review process. As an alternative, the applicant may volunteer to have an M - 1 Planning Commission Minutes February 22, 2006 Page 2 approved archaeologist on site during any excavation in lieu of a review by the . aforementioned cultural team. If during an excavation that by decision ofthe cultural review team occurs without an approved archaeologist on-site, any phenomena of possible archaeological jnterest are uncovered, the developer shall stop such work and provide for a site inspection and evaluation by a professional archaeologist to ensure that all possible valuable archaeological data is properly salvaged. 2. The vertical clearance ofthe utility bridge shall not be less than 13 feet 6 inches. 3. Applicant shall use all best management practices during construction to avoid negative impacts to the shoreline and marine waters. 4. All permits required by other agencies shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain. All conditions required by other agencies with jurisdiction shall be observed as a condition of this permit approval. Findings: 1. An application for a shoreline permit was submitted by Nippon Paper Industries, on January 6, 2006, for a new utility bridge to connect the paper mill to the oil tank farm. The application indicates that the work will occur within 200 feet of the shoreline. The site is 100% covered by impervious surface. The proposed utility bridge is a minor change to the existing structures on site to allow for easier access and maintenance. . 2. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued by the City of Port Angeles SEP A Responsible Official for the proposal on February 17, 2006. 3. The International Fire Code (IFC) Section 503.2.1 requires that the unobstructed vertical clearance of an apparatus access road be not less than 13 feet 6 inches. 4. The Port Angeles Shoreline Master Program (SMP), Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Critical Areas Ordinances have been reviewed with respect to this application. 5. The Port Angeles SMP Chapter 5 H. Environmental Designation matrices list non-water- oriented industrial uses as conditionally allowed as an addition to an existing use in the Urban Harbor (UR) designation. 6. The site is designated Industrial on the City's Comprehensive Plan, Industrial Heavy in the City's Zoning Ordinance, and Urban-Harbor in the City's Shoreline Master Program. 7. The following adopted City policies are most relevant to the proposed project: Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Goal A, Policies A-2, Goal G, Goal H, Policy H-3, H-4, and Economic Development Element Policy A-4 and the City's Shoreline Master Program's Urban-Harbor designation and Chapter 3 Goals AI, A2, B1, Chapter 4, Policies B.1 and Chapter E2. . M - 2 . . . 7;~: Planning Commission Minutes February 22. 2006 Page 3 8. The City's waterfront trail follows Marine Drive through the Nippon Industries site and will not be impacted by the project. 9. Public notice was provided as required by the publication in the local newspaper on January 16, 2006 and the site was posted for development activity. 10. Notice of development application was sent to agencies with jurisdiction and the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe. No comments were received within the comment period citing any issues of concern. Conclusions: A. The proposed project as conditioned, is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Master Program and pertinent City ordinances. B. The project will not be detrimental to the shoreline or result in an increase in impervious surface on the site. C. As conditioned, the proposed project will not interfere with public use oflands or waters. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kidd and passed 5 - O. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - ENNIS CREEK SUBDIVISION - A pre1iminarv subdivision ofpropertv located in the RS-9 Residential Single Family zone creating 19 single family building: sites. Associate Planner Scott Johns presented the Department's report recorrimending approval of the preliminary subdivision as proposed. Chair Rasmussen opened the public hearing. Steve Zenovic, Zen 0 vie and Associates, 519 South Peabody represented the applicant. Mr. Zenovic basically agreed with the staffs analysis and recommendation and briefly noted that the property was purchased from the City, and that the proposal is to provide 20 residential building sites and a remnant parcel of approximately 17.5 acres that encompasses Ennis Creek and its ravine. The property owner is working to dedicate the sensitive area to the North Olympic Land Trust. Mr. Zenovic commented that the main stormwater system is already in place. He believes that, since there are no street related stormwater improvements to be made, a better solution for stormwater control is to require each lot to develop stormwater plans consistent with 1992 stormwater regulations during development. Following continued discussion, Commissioner Kidd moved to approve the preliminary subdivision citing the following conditions, findings, and conclusions: Conditions: 1. All necessary easements for access, drainage, and utilities shall be shown on the final plat. M - 3 Planning Commission Minutes February 22. 2006 Page 4 2. 3. 4. 5. All residential structures shall be fitted with fire sprinkler systems. Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground. Individual lot owners shall submit stormwater management plans as part of building permit applications. Building setbacks shall be identified on the final plat and address numbers placed on the lots, which will be provided by the Public Works and Utilities Department. The sensitive area tract shall be recorded per the requirements of the City's Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protection Ordinance. 7. Prior to issuance of any clearing and grading permits, the Ennis Creek ravine sensitive area tract shall be identified by a split rail fence indicating the limit ofthe 25-foot buffer at the top of the bank as shown by survey with signage indicating that the ravine and Ennis Creek are Environmentally Sensitive areas. Signage shall be placed at locations that may provide access to the public. 8. Erosion and sedimentation control measures shall be in place prior to grading or placement of utilities. 6. Findings: 1. Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (P AMC) sets forth local requirements for the approval of subdivisions. RCW 58.17. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision. It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written findings that these provisions are made. Section 16.08.050(B)(1) PAMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written recommendations ofthe City Departments, and shall either approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a period of90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City Planning Division. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting. The Port Angeles Public Works and Utilities, Light, Parks, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed Subdivision. Their comments have been incorporated in the Department's recommendation. Preliminary approval is based upon a drawing dated received December 30, 2005, prepared by Zenovic and Associates. 2. 3. 4. 5. M - 4 . . . . . . Planning Commission Minutes February 22. 2006 Page 5 6. The subject property is identified as Low Density Residential and Open Space on the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 7. The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A.2, Goal B, Policy B.1, B.2, B.3, and BA, Goal C; Transportation Element Goal A, Policy A.3, A.6, and B.11; Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goal A, B, Policy B.1, B.3, BA, B.5, B.6, B.7, C.2, C.3, CA, C.5, and C.7. 8. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer service and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9). 9. The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Policy B.3) states that development should be designed to further the grid system pattern. Preliminary approval will be based upon the dedication of right-of-way to ensure compliance with the policy. 10. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Residential Single Family (RS-9) which allows a density of up to 4.84 dwelling units per acre on minimum 9,000 square-foot lots, and Public Buildings and Parks (PBP). The proposed drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 9,000 square feet in size. No residential development will occur in the area zoned PBP. 11. The site is surrounded by other residential uses located in the RS-9 zone with the Peninsula Golf Course located to the west in the PBP zone and commercial uses along the Highway 1 0 1 corridor to the north. 12. The site is currently served by Del Guzzi Drive, which is neither an arterial, a designated school walking route, or a designated bicycle route. 13. Ennis Creek and the Ennis Creek ravine are environmentally sensitive areas located on the site. The site slopes downward from west to east toward the creek. No residential development will be allowed in the environmentally sensitive area. The site is not considered a frequently flooded area as it is not listed on the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) maps which denote those areas that are in 100-year flood areas. 14. Transit service is available along Highway 101 approximately Y2 mile north ofthe site. 15. Building permits are required for all structures on the completed sites. All local building and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler systems. 16. The Port Angeles School District has been notified ofthe development to allow them to plan for needed public school facilities and routes. School bus pick-up is not available to the site at this time. Port Angeles School District will evaluate the need for school bus service on a yearly basis. The City's Parks Department has responded that they are aware of the preliminary proposal and do not believe the level of service for the area will be hampered asa result of the development. 17. M - 5 Planning Commission Minutes February 22. 2006 Page 6 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. All utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the area. The site will be serviced by the City's Police, Fire,. and Public Works Departments. . ' The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS #1141) on February 13, 2006, therefore satisfying the City's responsibility under the Act. Improvements to Del Guzzi Drive have been made to City street standards. No further utility improvements are required. The PlanningC6ifunission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval. Reports are advisory only to ensure conformance of the proposed subdivision to the general purposes of the City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and specifications adopted by the City. Conclusions: As conditioned, the preliminary subdivision is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 PAMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school. Signage educating residents and visitors to the sensitive nature of the critical area will serve to protect the creek and slopes. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting of this subdivision as articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision provides for development of new homes withinthe City of Port Angeles consistent with the Growth Management Act. Commissio/ler Johnson seconded the motion, which passed 5 - O. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. . . PENINSULA VILLAGE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION FINAL REVIEW: Amendment to and final review of a previously approved planned residential development and subdivision in the RS-9 Residential Single Family zone. Associate Planner Scott Johns reviewed the Department's report recommending approval of the final planned residential development and subdivision with conditions. He . explained that a condition is needed to address erosion and sedimentation issues that have been an ongoing problem throughout construction on the site. Several site visits have been made by City staff in an attempt to identify and correct the short comings of the construction site, but the M - 6 . . . Planning Commission Minutes February 22. 2006 Page 7 site at present still is not in compliance with standard best management practices expected in the City for development. Staffhas been very explicit that if the management practices are not immediately correcte~, the site will be shut down until brought to minimum standards for erosion and sedimentation control. Condition No.5 will ensure that if immediate measures are not taken, the site will be shut down, and an amendment to proposed Condition 4 was made to ensure that once brought into compliance, the site will remain in compliance throughout the development process. Bob Leach, Northwestern Territories, Inc., 717 South Peabody Street, explained that the property changed ownership after the preliminary planned residential development and subdivision approval was made and the new owner decided to reduce the number of lots from 38 to 32. The owner believes that the amended development proposal will better fit with other development in the area and that the larger lot sizes will suit the general area better than originally presented. All other conditions of approval either have been completed or will be bonded for to gain final approval of the development. Mr. Leach responded to Commissioner Rasmussen that properties to the south of the site are accessed from Maddock Road and are located in the County so do not enjoy City services. Jim Ciaciuch, 113 South Valley Street, provided background as to how he acquired ownership of the site and explained some of the many problems that he has encountered during the construction activity. He indicated that the previous owner had begun development prior to his purchasing of the site and some of the utility infrastructure needed to be replaced which created quite a disturbance of soil during the winter rainy season. The site has been difficult to develop partially because of the management practices of the previous owner/developer and largely due to the rainy season and poor soil conditions. He is committed to moving forward in a positive manner and to developing a quality development. Following discussion regarding wording of proposed Condition Nos. 4 and 5, and added I findings and conclusions to support the conditions, Commissioner Kalish moved to recommend that the City Council approve the planned residential development and subdivision citing the conditions as proposed by staff, and supported by the following findings and conclusions: Conditions: 1. All conditions of preliminary approval shall remain in effect. 2. Fire hydrants shall be located per the Fire Department requirements. 3. A bond other security measures acceptable to the City attorney in the amount of $206,000 ($137,499 X 150%) for completion of infrastructure requirements shall be in place before final approval is granted. 4. Erosion and sedimentation controls shall be in place and properly maintained throughout the life of the project. If found to fail, work shall cease until the required measures are in place per City specifications regarding best management practices and process of the PRD reviews shall cease until the situation is rectified. Inspection of the site to ensure that erosion and sedimentation control measures have been placed per the City's direction shall be done by the City on February 23,2006. Work shall cease after a 24-hour notification until the required measures are in place per City specifications regarding best management practices and process of the PRD reviews shall cease until the situation is rectified. Additionally, if the inspection fails and work is not M - " 5. Planning Commission Minutes February 22. 2006 Page 8 Findings: 1. 2. under way to correct the short coming, an amount of money shall be set by the City . Engineer to rectify the situation that will be added to the bonding described in Condition 3 such that the City shall perform the work. Preliminary approval of the PRD and Subdivision was granted on June 1,2004. A request for amendment was received on January 27,2006. The proposed amendment reduces the number of lots and increases the size of the lots from the design of the approved PRD and subdivision. Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) Chapter 17.19 sets forth the City's requirements for the approval of planned residential developments, and PAMC Chapter 16.08 sets forth the City's requirements for the approval of subdivisions. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision. It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written findings that these provisions are made. 5. The purpose of a planned residential development (PRD) is set forth in Section 17.19.010 as follows: 3. 4. . This Overlay Zone is to provide alternative zoning regulations which permit and encourage design flexibility, conservation and protection of natural amenities and critical areas, and innovation in residential developments to those regulations found in the underlying zone. It is intended that a Planned Residential Development will result in a residential environment of higher quality than traditionallot-by-Iot development by use of a design process which includes within the site design all the components of a residential neighborhood, such as open space, circulation, building types, and natural features, in a manner con$istent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 6. The proposed 15-acre Peninsula Village Planned Residential Development (PRD) and Subdivision site is located on the south side of Lindberg Road and east of Golf Course Road. 7. The proposed amendment has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and Subdivision Ordinance. The Comprehensive Plan land use designations for the site is High Density Residential (HDR). The approximately 9.3 acre property in the first phase of the PRD was rezoned to RHD Residential High Density several years ago and is situated across Lindberg Road from Peninsula Golf Course, which is zoned PBP Public Buildings and Parks due to its open space characteristics. M - 8 ' . . . . r' ,'-.l.'~'}i, Planning Commission Minutes February 22, 2006 Page 9 Other surrounding properties, including the second phase ofthe PRD, are zoned RS-9 Residential Single Family and either are developed with low-density residential uses or are undeveloped. 8. The City's Fire, Public Works, Parks and Recreation, and Community Development Departments reviewed the proposed amendment to the planned residential development and subdivision preliminary plat. 9. The propos~1l11eet~!he minimum site size for a planned residential development, and only single family homes, which are permitted uses in the RHD Zone, are proposed. 10. The City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments currently serve the site. 11. Building permits are required for all structures on any approved building lots. Alllocal Building and Fire Codes apply to any new construction on the subject property. 12. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS #1065) on May 7,2004, satisfying the City's SEP A responsibility. 13. The applicant has submitted an engineers estimate for completion of improvements required by Section 16.08.070 PAMC in the amount of $137,499. 14. Section 16.08.050(B)(2) allows the developer to install or assure installation of the improvements required by Section 16.08.070 PAMC by furnishing to the City an assignment of a savings account or another approved security or placing in trust, an amount equal to 150% ofthe cost of the improvements as determined by the City Engineer, which assignment of savings account, other security, or trust shall assure to the City the installation of the improvements, to the satisfaction and approval of the City Engineer. 15. Inspection ofthe site on February 17, 21, and 22,2006, revealed that erosion and sedimentation practices on the site do not meet the City's minimum engineering standards. The applicant has been notified several times of this shortcoming. Conclusions: A. The conditions of the Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision are consistent with the Zoning Code, required by the Subdivision Ordinance, and necessary to implement the Comprehensive Plan. B. As conditioned, all the necessary public improvements will be installed per the City Urban Services Standards and Guidelines. C. As conditioned, the configuration of the proposed subdivision lots and street layouts conform to the desired urban design of the City for the residential developments in outlying areas where there is no grid street pattern and low impact development standards are allowed. The curvilinear private streets and cul-de-sac with a 25 foot paved surface and no parking along the streets reduce stormwater runoff and still provide adequate access for each residential lot. As conditioned, the utility services will be provided consistent with the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines and the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan level of service standards. Analysis of downstream sanitary sewer capacity has been D. M - 9 Planning Commission Minutes February 22. 2006 Page 10 E. F. G. provided that indicates no capacity improvements are needed for the additional 38 units of Peninsula Village PRD. The small lots proposed for the Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision are desired for several reasons: 1) the geographical and BPA easement constraints on the site, 2) recovering City costs for OLID 215, 3) the mixed types of housing already located in the zone and vicinity, 4) the provision of affordable homes for new families and other first time home buyers, and 5) the lots satisfy the desired urban design of the City, except for their small size, which fits the density requirements ofthe RHO Zone and the PRD Overlay Zone. This is not the basic urban land use pattern for the City's higher density multi-family residential neighborhoods. The density is much more like a single-family residential neighborhood, and the street and block system is more like outlying areas, which are largely undeveloped. However, it is not atypical for this zone and vicinity where another small lot, single-family subdivision in the RHO Zone exists nearby. While it does not meet the high-density purposes of the RHO Zone, it does provide for a higher density single-family development with surrounding open spaces consistent with the PRD Overlay Zone. The Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision provide an alternative residential development design to the basic single family residential neighborhood and the basic multi-family residential neighborhood in a manner that is affordable as starter homes for new families and other first time home buyers. Conditions are recommended that would satisfy the PRD standards that are not included in the proposal plans. As conditioned, the Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision amended preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. As conditioned, the Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision preliminary plat is in conformance with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 P AMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the preliminary approval of planned residential development and platting of the subdivision as articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and Subdivision, Ordinance. The subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the Growth Management Act and beneficial to the City's tax base. The Peninsula Village PRD and Subdivision will recover funds expended by the city in support ofULID 215. The final drainage plan must be approved by the City Engineer, and the City's stormwater drainage standards will require that the proposed development not impact downstream properties anymore than pre-development conditions as requested by Peninsula Golf Course. The drainage and erosion control plans also are subject to the Department of Ecology NPDES permit. . . . H. 1. J. K. L. M - 10 . . . Planning Commission Minutes February 22, 2006 Page 11 The project engineer is working with the BonnevIlle Power Administration, and BPA's comments reflect the expectation that the residential uses will be compatible. N. The PAMC Chapter 17.19 Planned Residential Development Overlay Zone and Chapter 16.08 Subdivision Regulations allow for variations from standards variations in street improvements, blocks, lots, and building line setbacks. Conditions are recommended where certain proposed variation should not be approved due to the small lot design, which allows for less on-site variation. M. O. The private street system, as allowed for a PRD, is proposed for Peninsula Village to minimize rights-of-way, stormwater drains, and/or pedestrian facilities that would be required for public streets. The 25-foot wide paved private streets must be posted for no parking, since there is not adequate pavement to allow for anything more than service and emergency vehicle access as well as individual lot access. P. Immediate construction measures are necessary to correct poor erosion and sedimentation control on the site. The project is conditioned to direct immediate corrective action prior to authorization or approvals necessary for fmal of the PRD. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kidd and passed 5 - O. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC None STAFF REPORTS Staffthanked Commissioner Rasmussen for his term of office on the Planning Commission and hoped that Mr. Rasmussen would participate in various committees in the future. Mr. Rasmussen said he would remain active in the community. REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS Planner Scott Johns reported that the City Council was reviewing the Campbell Avenue Planned Residential Development but had not as yet reached a decision. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. Sue Roberds, Planning Manager Cherie Kidd, Vice Chair M - 11 , . . . M - 12 . MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION Port Angeles, Washington 98362 March 8, 2006 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Dave Johnson, Cherie Kidd, Kevin Snyder, Candace Kalish, John Matthews, Stanley Harris, Werner Beier Members Excused: None Staff Present: Mark Madsen, Nathan West, Sue Roberds, Scott Johns, Jim Mahlum Public Present: Bill Hermann, David Stofferahan, Taylor Jennings, Steve Zenovic, Mary Robuck, Lorraine Ross, V ort Gavin, Doc Reiss The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Kidd. ELECTION OF OFFICERS . Commissioner Kalish nominated Commissioner Kidd as Chair for the 2006 term of office. The nomination was seconded by Commissioner Snyder. As there were no further nominations, a vote was taken and passed unanimously. Commissioner Kalish nominated Commissioner Johnson as Vice Chair for the 2006 term of office. The nomination was seconded by Commissioner Kidd. As there were no 1 further nominations, a vote was taken which passed unanimously. City Manager Mark Madsen welcomed new Commissioners Stan Harris and Werner Beier on behalf ofthe City and thanked them for volunteering to serve the community. He congratulated the new Chair and Vice Chair on their appointments and encouraged all of the Commissioners to remain in close contact with staff and to utilize those resources to the betterment of the Commission process. . APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the February 22, 2006, regular meeting minutes. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Matthews and passed 5 - 2 with newly appointed Commissioners Harris and Beier abstaining. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Chair Kidd indicated that those who testify must sign the "Sign In" log and affirm that their testimony will be truthful to the best of their knowledge. M - 13 Planning Commission Minutes March 8. 2006 Page 2 STREET Y ACATION PETITION - ANDERSON etal- STY 06-01: Portion of"P Street south of Milwaukee Drive and a portion of 16th Street between Milwaukee Drive and Reyes Street. Planning Manager Sue Roberds reviewed the Department's report recommending approval ofthe street vacation as proposed and responded to questions from Commissioner Harris regarding necessary street widths for various right-of-way development. Chair Kidd opened the public hearing. David Stofferahan, 54 Cleary Lane, Sequim, WA 98382 was in agreement with staffs recommendation and responded that the reason he asked for a 5' strip of property along the north right-of-way line of 16th Street is simply to allow for additional lot area. The additional property does not allow for an increase in the number oflots intended for the proposed subdivision. There being no further testimony, Chair Kidd closed the public hearing. Commissioner Snyder moved to recommend that the City Council approve the street vacation as proposed citing the following findings and conclusions: Findings: 1. A petition requesting vacation ofthat portion ofthe unopened "P" Street right-of-way south of Milwaukee Drive and north of 16th Street and the north 5' of 16th Street abutting Suburban Lot 83 was submitted on January 10, 2006. Abutting properties are owned by the petitioners Mr. Charles Anderson and David Stofferahan. RCW 58.17 requires the signatures of two thirds of abutting property owners to be valid when a vacation of right-of-way is proposed. The subject petition is signed by 100% ofthe abutting property owners. Abutting properties are zoned RS-9 and RS-ll Residential Single Family and those that are developed contain single family structures. The RS, Residential Single Family zones allow the basic single family development uses including accessory structures with lot coverage up to 30%. The City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map were reviewed for consistency with the proposed vacation of right-of-way. Land Use Map Goal, Policies, and Objective Element Goal A is relevant to the proposaL The City of Port Angeles' Real Estate Committee met on February 13,2006, and established a value for the unopened right-of-way. The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the Washington Administratiye Code. The site was posted for a land use action on February 22, 2006, with required publication notification in the Peninsula Dailv News on-February 26, 2006. At its February 21,2006, regular,meeting, the Port Angeles City Council established a public hearing date by resolution for action on the street vacation petition as March 21, 2006. The Real Estate Committee ofthe City Council discussed compensation for the right-of-way and decided upon a value of $1.86 per square foot. The Port Angeles Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed street vacation on March 8, 2006. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. M - 14 . . . Planning Commission Minutes March 8. 2006 Page 3 . Conclusions: A. The unopened right-of-way serves no purpose to the current or long range transportation needs of the City. The proposed vacation will place unused property on the City's tax roles and therefore, the vacation serves the public interest. B. The vacated right-of-way will be consolidated with surrounding residential property and shall be developed in a manner consistent with the RS-9 zone which would therefore be in compliance with Section 17.11 ( RS-9 Zone) of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. C. The proposal is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan specifically Land Use Map Goal, Policies and Objective Element Goal A. . . The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kalish and passed unanimously. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - HERITAGE COURT: 12TH Street east of"O" Street: Development of a 4.14 acre property into 15 residential building sites in the RS-9 Residential Single Family zone. Commissioner Matthews noted for the record that the applicant constructed his home but he felt that he could act fairly on the matter before the Commission.. No one objected to his remaining to act on the issue. Associate Planner Scott Johns reviewed the Department's report recommending approval of the preliminary subdivision with conditions. Chair Kidd opened the public hearing. Steve Zenovic, 519 South Peabody #22 represented the applicant and stated that the cul-de- sac design is pretty straight forward with stand infrastructure development. Mary Robuck, 2508 West 1 UIl Street is an adjacent property owner and asked what the size of the lots will be and how stormwater will be handled. Steve Zenovic, 519 South Peabody #22 responded by explaining the proposed utility development on-site and that stormwater would be directed to an existing collection system in "N" Street. There will be some subsurface detention and post runoff will not exceed pre runoff amounts. Lot sizes will exceed that required in the RS-9 Residential Single Family zone of9,OOOsquare feet per site. Mary Robuck said that she had filed a formal complaint with the City's Engineering Department regarding storm water problems in the area but had not heard back regarding her concerns. Planner Johns noted that, on a site visit to the subject property, he encountered one ofthe City's engineering staff who was investigating the complaint, and he was sure that the individual would respond shortly to Mrs. Robuck. Vort Gavin, 2510 West 1 UIl Street is also a nearby property owner and asked for clarification as to long range utility development plans in the area. Chair Kidd directed Mr. Gavin to call the City's Public Works and Utilities Department for those answers as staff in attendance is not able to answer those long range questions. Chair Kidd also asked if the applicant is designing sidewalks within the development? Mr. Zenovic answered that sidewalks are planned for the subdivision interior. There being no further questions, Chair Kidd closed the public hearing. Following brief discussion, Commissioner Johnson moved to recommend approval ofthe proposed subdivision citing the following conditions, findings, and conclusions: M - 15 Planning Commission Minutes March 8. 2006 Page 4 Conditions: . 1. The interior street shall be identified and shall be dedicated and constructed per the City's urban service s~andards, including a 34- foot travel area with curb and gutter prior to approval of the final plat. 2. The applicant shall dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way along the entire frontage of 12th Street. 3. The fire hydrant spacing shall be as required by the City Fire Department to a maximum 1000' of separation distance. Residences shall be fitted with sprinkler systems. 4. Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground. 5. Prior to final plat approval, water service shall be extended to the lots as required by the Public Works Department. 6. Stormwater management plans per the City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines shall be submitted to Public Works and Utilities Department for review and approval, and installed prior to final plat approval. 7. Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works Department from 12th Street and shown on the preliminary plat. . 8. Building setbacks shall be identified on the final plat and address numbers placed on the lots, which will be provided by th.e~uilding Division. .~'.:,,:::c::~~;;P;f~:':::~:;:, '; .' "":"::+,~1';:.~~:~;iEf~~~ 9. Twelfth Street improvements shall.be made to Public Works Department standards prior to final plat approval. A total 34-foot wide paved surface with standard curb is required. Findings: 1. Chapter 16.08 ofthe Port Angeles Municipal Code (P AMC) sets forth local requirements for the approval of subdivisions. RCW 58.17. 2. The Revised Code 0 fW ashington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision. It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all otherrelevant facts including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written findings that these provisions are made. . M - 16 . . . Planning Commission Minutes March 8. 2006 Page 5 3. Section 16.08.050(B)(1) P AMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine the proposed plat, ,along with written recommendations ofthe City Departments, and shall either approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City Planning Department. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting. The Port Angeles Public Works and Utilities, Light, Parks, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed Subdivision. Their comments have been incorporated in the Department's recommendation. 4. Preliminary approval is based upon a drawing dated received January 13,2006, prepared for LBR Construction Co. Inc. by Zenovic and Associates. The subject property is identified as Low Density Residential on the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan land use map. The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A.2, Goal B, Policy B.1, B.2, B.3, and B.4, Goal C; Transportation Element Goal A, Policy A.3, A.6, and B.11; Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goal A, B, PolicyB.1, B.3, B.4, B.5, B.6, B.7, Goal C, Policy C.1, C.2, C.3, CA, C.5, and C.5. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer service and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9). ':.'-.":--- ."--" The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Policy B.3) states that development should be designed to further the grid system pattern. Preliminary approval will be based I upon the dedication of right-of-way to ensure compliance with the policy. The subject property is identified on the Port Angeles Zoning Map as RS-9 Residential Single Family, which allows a density of up to 4.84 units per acre. The proposed drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 9,000 square feet in size. The site is currently served by 12th Street, which is neither an arterial, a designated school walking route, or a designated bicycle route. "0" Street, which abuts the western 70 feet of the subdivision is a collector arterial. 12. Transit service is available along IN"Street east of the site. 13. Building permits are required for all structures on individual building lots. All local building and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler systems. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 14. The Port Angeles School District has been notified ofthe development to allow them to plan for needed public school facilities and routes. School busses currently operate on "N" Street , and 14th Street. The Port Angeles School District evaluates school bus routes on an annual basis. M - 17 Planning Commission Minutes March 8. 2006 Page 6 15. All utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the . area and will be extended to the newly created lots in the subdivision. 16. The City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments will service the site. 17. . The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS #1144) on March 1, 2006, therefore satisfying the City's responsibility under the Act. 18. Improvements to 12th will be required such that the final roadway is an improved width of 34 feet with a standard curb. 19. The Port of Port Angeles operation ofthe Fairchild International Airport is located in the area south of the site. The Port staff has been notified ofthe proposed subdivision proposal and it is expected that those who purchase properties in the final subdivision will be aware ofthe existing on-going airport operation. 20. The Planning Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval. Reports are advisory only to ensure conformance ofthe proposed subdivision to the general purposes of the City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and specifications adopted by the City. There are no environmentally sensitive areas on the site. The site has a minimal slope to the north. The site is not considered a frequently flooded area and is not listed on the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) maps which denote those areas that are within 100- year flood areas. 21. . 22. The City's Parks Department has noted that they are aware of the preliminary proposal and do not believe the level of service for the area will be hampered as a result of the development. The City's LOS for parks and recreational services is 1/3 acre for 1,000 population. An undeveloped wooded property donated to the City for a park use is located less than 12 mile northeast of the subject site along "N" Street. The nearest public playground area is located approximately one mile northeast (Crown Park) or one and a quarter mile southeast (Lincoln Park). 23. The Port Angeles School District has been notified ofthe development to allow them to plan for needed public school facilities and routes. The Port Angeles School District provides school bus pick-up for students at Hamilton Elementary School and Stevens Middle School at 12th and "N" Streets. Conclusions: A. As conditioned, the proposed Subdivision is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. c. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 P AMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school. M - 18 . B. Planning Commission Minutes March 8. 2006 Page 7 . D. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting ofthis subdivision as articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the Growth Management Act. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Beier and passed unanimously. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - JUAN de FUCA BLUFFS: 14th Street west of "P" Street: Development of a 10.16 acre site into 24 residential lots in the RS-ll Residential Single Family zone. Associate Planner Scott Johns reviewed the Department's report recommending approval of the subdivision and responded to several questions specific to development near the bluff critical area of the site. Mr. Johns explained that individual lot owners will need to discuss site specific clearing proposals prior to any such activity in those areas designated to be environmentally sensitive along the marine bluff. He spoke regarding circulation between the subject proposal and a recently approved subdivision to the east of"P" Street (Walker Subdivision) in the area. In response to Commissioner Beier regarding the bluff setback, Mr. Johns stated that the City requires a minimum 50' setback from environmentally sensitive marine bluff features unless an engineering report requires a more restrictive setback. Other geologic hazard reports for properties in the area have varied from a required 50' to as much as 75' of setback from the bluff. Geologic hazard reports are always required for development of properties that contain established environmentally sensitive areas. Chair Kidd opened the public hearing. There was no one present to speak to the issue. Chair Kidd closed the public hearing. The Commission continued a discussion regarding development ofthose lots near the marine bluff and how best to protect the natural feature and resulting development. Commissioner Snyder moved to recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision with the following conditions, findings, and conclusions: Conditions: . 5. The interior street shall be dedicated and constructed per the City's urban service standards, which includes a 24-foot travel surface, roadside vegetated swales for drainage, and 4-foot sidewalks prior to approval of the final plat. Signage shall be placed on the internal street indicating that on-street parking is prohibited. The fire hydrant spacing shall be as required by the City Fire Department to ,a maximum 1000' of separation distance. Residences shall be fitted with sprinkler systems. Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground. Prior to final plat approval, water service shall be extended to the lots as required by the Public Works Department with an 8-inch main. Stormwater improvement plans shall be submitted for approval per the City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines and installed prior to final plat approval. Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works Department . from Milwaukee Drive and shown on the preliminary plat. 1. 2. 3. 4. . 6. M - 19 Planning Commission Minl/tes March 8. 2006 Page 8 7. Building setbacks shall be identified on the final plat and address numbers provided by Public Works and Utilities Department placed on the lots. 8. The applicant shall place a statement on the plat and make it known to all subsequent purchasers ofsubject lots that said lots are in the proximity of the William R. Fairchild International Airport and that the Port of Port Angeles does not warrant that these lots will always be outside the lowest noise contour currently established for residential use. 9. Fourteenth Street and "P" Street improvements shall be made to Public Works Department standards prior to final plat approval. The applicant shall improve the north ~ plus 10 feet of 14th Street with curb, gutter, and a 6-foot wide sidewalk. "P" Street shall be improved to a t()Y:!L,~A;J22hJJfl::yel width with vegetated drainage swales and a 4-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the west side. Findings: 1. Chapter 16.08 ofthe Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAM C) sets forth local requirements for the approval of subdivisions. RCW 58.17. 2. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision. It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written findings that these provisions are made. 3. Section 16.08.050(B)(1) P AMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written recommendations ofthe City Departments, and shall either approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City Planning Department. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting. 4. The Port Angeles Public Works, Light, Parks, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed Subdivision. Their comments have been incorporated in the Department's recommendation. 5. Preliminary approval is based upon a drawing dated received January 27,2006, prepared for Kenneth Hopfby 4 Seasons Engineering. 6. The subject property is identified as Low Density Residential on the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan land use map. 7. The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A.2, Goal B, Policy B.l, B.2, B.3, and B.4, Goal C; Transportation Element Goal A, Policy A.3, A.6, and B.ll; Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goal A, B, PolicyB.l, B.3, B.4, B.5, B.6, B.7, C.2, C.3;.CA, and C.5. o M - ~O . . . . . 19. . 20. Planning Commission Minutes March 8. 2006 Page 9 7. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer service and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9). The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Policy B.3) states that development should be designed to further the grid system pattern. Preliminary approval will be based upon the dedication of right-of-way to ensure compliance with the policy. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Residential Single Family RS-11, which allows a density of up to 3.96 dwelling units per acre. The proposed drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 11,000 square feet m SIze. 8. 9. 10. The site will be served by 14th Street, which is neither an arterial, a designated school walking route, nor a designated bicycle route. 11. The marine bluff along the north side of the site is considered an environmentally sensitive area. The appropriate buffer area from the bluff is indicated on the plan. The site is generally level with only a slight slope from south to north. The site is not considered a frequently flooded area as it is not listed on the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) maps which denote those areas that are in lOa-year flood areas. 12. The closest transit service is available along "N" Street east of the site. "N" street at the intersection of 1 Oth is the nearest school walking route. The Port Angeles School District evaluates school bus routes and school walking routes on an annual basis. 13. The Port Angeles School District has been notified ofthe development to allow them to plan for needed public school facilities and routes. School busses travel on "N" Street. Building permits are required for all structures on the platted lots. All local building and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler systems. All utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the area. 14. 15. 16. The City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments will service the site. 17. . The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS #1145) on March 2, 2006, therefore satisfying the City's responsibility under the Act. 18. Improvements to the internal roadway and "P" Street will be required such that the final roadway is an improved width of 24 feet with a vegetated drainage swale and a 4' concrete sidewalk established on one side per the City's suburban low impact development standards. Improvements to 14th Street will require 27 feet of paved travel surface with curb, gutter, and a 6- foot concrete sidewalk on the north side. The Port of Port Angeles operation ofthe Fairchild International Airport is located in the area south of the site. The Port staff has been notified ofthe proposed subdivision proposal and it is expected that those who purchase properties in the final subdivision will be aware ofthe existing on-going airport operation. The City's low impact development standards in suburban areas adopted earlier in 2003 were adopted with the understanding that subdivisions developed under the standards would not allow for on-street parking. Site development and design for residential lots developed under M - 21 Planning COlllmission Minutes March 8. 2006 Page 10 21. the lower impact standards need to accommodate resident parking and visitor parking on-site. Roadside drainage swales developed under low impact development standards should be kept free of debris by adjacent property owners. The Planning ,Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval. Reports are advisory only to ensure conformance ofthe proposed subdivision to the general purposes of the City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and specifications adopted by the City. Conclusions: A. As conditioned, the proposed Subdivision is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 PAMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school. Signage educating residents and visitors to the prohibition of on-street parking should be included in the conditions for subdivision approval in those areas developed under the City's low impact development standards in order to prevent public safety issues that could result if on-street parking clogged streets that are allowed to be reduced in size. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting ofthis subdivision as articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the Growth Management Act. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Matthews and passed unanimously. REZONE PROPOSAL - REZ 06-02 - BRADOW/NYHUS: Rezone from RS-ll Residential Single Familv to ill Industrial Heavv. B. C. D. E. . . Principle Planner Nathan West reviewed the Department's Report recommending approval of the proposed rezone to Industrial Heavy. Planner West noted that the area was annexed into the City in 2005 as residential because that is what the property was classified as while in the county. Other properties in the almexation area that border the subject site have already been rezoned to Industrial Heavy. The property owners requested this rezone. Chair Kidd opened the pub lie hearing. There was no one to speak to the issue, however, staff stated that City staff is representing this proposal at this point as the area was inadvertently left out of earlier rezone review. Chair Kidd closed the public hearing. Following brief discussion regarding the previous rezone review of areas annexed in 2005 and other uses in the subject area, Commissioner Matthews moved to recommend . approval of the rezone as proposed citing the following findings and conclusions: M - 22 Planning Commission Minutes March 8. 2006 Page 11 . Findin!!s . . 1. On February 24,2006, the City of Port Angeles, as requested by property owners, submitted a application to rezone approximately 24.86 acres from Residential Single Family RS-ll to Industrial Heavy. The area was annexed to the City in June 2005 by Ordinance #3207. 2. The City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is intended as the guiding document in determining the consistency in zoning and establishing a conceptual framework for land use decisions. The map designates the property as Industrial. 3, The property is described as E2SE LT 4 EXC R\W & PT S HWY 5.20A and UND ~ INT IN SWSE SO OF HWY 19.66A and consists of2318, 2324, 2154 and 2156 West Highway 101 and is located between 2346 W. H wy 101 and P A Hardwoods. The parcel numbers for the properties are 63007340150, and 63007430125. 4. The subj ect site is partially developed with single family residences and ancillary structures. 5. The purpose ofthe ill zone (P AMC 17.34.010) is "This is the least restrictive industrial zone intended to be the area in which heavy industry could develop causing the least impact on other land uses. Significant adverse impacts can be expected from permitted industrial uses that involve hazardous materials, noise, air and water pollution, shift work around the clock, entertainment businesses with adult-only activities, and outside storage yards and manufacturing activities. This zone provides the basic urban land use pattern for heavy industrial uses with direct access to major transportation facilities, design standards for greater truck traffic, and buffers for nonindustrial uses unless deemed impractical. " 6. County Zoning in the area includes County - Rural Character Conservation 3 (RCC3) to the' south, County - fudustrial and Urban Very Low Density/Low Density (LD) to the north. City zoning includes fudustrial Heavy (ill) zoning to the east, west and south. Developed properties in the area are consistent with underlying zoning designations. 7. A rezone proposal cannot be considered a spot zone ifit meets the following tests: 1) the parcel of land has not been singled out for special and privileged treatment; 2) the singling out is in the public interest and not only for the benefit of the land owner; and 3) the action is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. 8. The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed in its entirety with respect to the proposal. The following elements, goals, and policies were found to be most relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A, and Policies A.l (a); Land Use Map Goal A and Policy A.l,2; Land Use Element fudustrial Goals G and Policy G.l; Goal H and Policy H.3. 9. The inventory offudustrial Heavy (ill) zoned land is approximately 796 acres. Additionally, the existing Heavy Industrial zoning is approximately 60% developed and a majority ofthis undeveloped land is owned by the Port of Port Angeles. M - 23 Planning Commission Minutes March 8. 2006 Page J 2 10. Two county delineated wetlands exist on site including a creek and pond. Future development will be required to comply with the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Ordinance Section 15.20 and the Wetlands Protection Ordinance Section 15.24. . 11. The SEP A Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance on March 3, 2006. 12. The public comment and notification period for the Planning Commission meeting ran from February 26 to March 8, 2006. Mailing labels were provided by the applicant. Surrounding property owners were notified that the request was for Industrial Heavy. 13. The City's Public Works and Utilities Department did not have any comment. Available utilities to the sites include: City power, and Dry Creek water. City sewer extends to Eclipse Industrial Parkway and can be extended by future developers. The Fire Department has noted that industrial use of the property would be subject to applicable fire protection provisions, including the provision of adequate fireflow. 14. Future development of the subject property will require specific project review including issues such as access, noise, lighting, landscaping and environmentally sensitive review. Conclusions: A. The proposal is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map as this area is designated as Industrial. Based on this designation staffis recommending approval of the proposed rezone. . B. Future development proposals should mitigate all environmental concerns regarding the wetlands onsite. C. Future development proposals should anticipate the necessity to install fire protection prOVISiOns. D. The rezone is compatible with the surrounding zoning and land uses and will allow development of the site to a higher density that has been identified as desired for the area by the City through its Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation and is therefore in the public interest. E. The City's action on rezone application REZ 06-02 is consistent with the established procedures for amending the Zoning Code set forth in Section i 7 .96.100, Port Angeles Municipal Code. F. Development plans may require further utility improvement by the developer. As no adverse impacts to neighboring streets are anticipated and street, walkway, and drainage will be also required with subsequent development, the proposed rezone is in the public interest. . M - 24 Planning Commission Minutes March 8. 2006 Page 13 . The motion was seeonded hy Commissioner Kalish and passed nnanimonsly. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Taylor Jennings, 629 East Front Street, hoped that the City would consider requiring sidewalk improvements on all City streets not just those that are arterial or school walking routes in consideration of the walking public. People walk on all streets not just arterials and school walking routes. Sidewalks will encourage more people to walk which will result in a healthier and safer public. In encouraging cultural economic development, Ms. Jennings encouraged the City to look at its regulations regarding work/live spaces particularly in industrial and residential zones. Many artists need an industrial zone in which to work and would like to live where they. work. Currently, residential occupancies are not permitted in industrial zones. She presented materials from other communities regarding work/live spaces for the Commission's review. Doc Reiss noted that he was sitting in attendance as a potential Planning Commission member. He agreed that the City's standards need to be reviewed to require sidewalks on all streets not just school walking routes and arterials. STAFF REPORTS . Staff reminded Commissioners of the upcoming work session scheduled for March 22. Although the work session is scheduled mainly for an introduction to the Comprehensive Planning process for new Commission members and a refresher for others, staff encouraged the Commissioners to bring any planning issue up at the meeting for discussion that would be helpful. In response to Commissioner Kalish, Sue Roberds noted that Attorney Bloor will be available for questions at the meeting. REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS Chair Cherie Kidd noted that she will be out of the country for the March 22 meeting. Scott Jolms offered to provide the power point presentation for the meeting for her review. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Cherie Kidd, Chair Sue Roberds, Secretary . M - 25 . . . M - 26 . . . City of Port Angeles Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission Port Angeles, Washington January 19, 2006 CALL TO ORDER- REGULAR MEETING: ROLL CALL: Approval of Minutes/Audio Tape Disposition - Items From Audience not on Agenda: Discussion Items: Lisa Sparhawk Request Playground Equipment Sites Chairman, Chuck Whidden called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission to order at 7:00 p.m in the Vern Burton Community Center meeting room Members Present: Jean Hordyk, David Shargel, Diana Tshimperle, Damaris Rodriguez, Chuck Whidden and Jack Harmon. Members Absent: Ron Johnson Staff Present: William Sterling, Deputy Director of Recreation, Glenn Cutler, Director of Public Works & Utilities, D Bellamente, Mari A. Bilsborrow, and Councilman Grant Munro Audience: Brian Gawley, Daily News, Eleanor Tschimperle, Lisa Sparhawk, Carol Gentry, Scott Johns and Taylor Jennings. Commission member, Hordyk moved to accept the minutes of December 15,2005 and dispose ofthe tapes in the usual manner. Commission member Shargel pointed out an adjustment, which needed to be made to the Roll Call. Commission member, Shargel seconded. Upon call for the question motion carried unanimously. None presented In regards to her letter of August 16,2005 inwhich she voiced concerns of differential fees for non-city residents utilizing William Shore Memorial Pool, Ms. Sparhawk was in attendance to inquire if a decision was made. Ms. Sparhawk reviewed her specific concerns regarding the higher price of swim lessons for county residents. She has requested a fee, which is more equitable compared to what city residents pay to use the pool. Councilmember Munro approximated the cost per city resident and pointed out that there is no absolute fair way to assess families based upon number of people per family. The cOUIlcil and parks commission have decided that since city residents have largely paid for the pool, those outside of the city limits would be assessed at a higher rate. Following discussion, the Parks Commission stated that they do not have authority to act upon requests such as this. At this time fees are not being reviewed but will take Ms. Sparhawks concerns under advisement when doing so. During the December meeting the Parks Commission chose Lion's Park as a first priority to receive playground equipment if funding were to become available. But due to age and deterioration of the play equipment at 5th & Oak Street and Charles R. Willson Parks, these will be replaced first. Serious consideration will be given to Lion's Park in 2006. Commission member Rodriguez inquired about the status of the Lion's Park group N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Park Board Min Jan 06.doc , M --1 27 Recreation 2006 Work Plan Request for Input 2005 Goal Ranking Recreation Division Priority Issues Recreation Division Goals - 2006 which met a couple of years ago to discuss and plan for the parks proposed renovation. Staff will be scheduling meetings with the original groups involved. . Staff requested additional detailed input from the Parks Commission regarding their priorities for 2006 Parks imd Recreation Goals. They were also asked for the top six priorities issues for 2006. Staff reviewed previous priority issues and goals with the Parks Commission and encouraged them to think seriously about what direction needs to be taken. Subsidy levels for recreation programs need to be looked at and discussed. Another key issue to be discussed in 2006 will be the review of user fees. The Council will be looking for recommendations for these fees, which will also affect a subsidy level decision. Once the Council has set a subsidy level, the recreation division will compile a fee recommendation. Quite a bit of information from outside our community will need to be gleaned in order to help us accomplish this task in an intelligent manner. Each recreation program will be researched to determine if it should be continued, stay as is, or expanded. Before the proposed tree removal in Lincoln Park occurs, it is imperative to have a conceptual idea regarding the future use of the land within the park. We also need to know what types of activities will be allowed within the glide path of the planes before any pre-planning takes place. . The design for the Senior Center addition will be accomplished in 2006 with construction to follow in 2007. A pool site recommendation will be made to City Council in April. Commission member Hordyk wish to include on the 2006 priority list the review the Parks Commission that was promised, in regards to the split and re-organization of the Parks and Recreation Department. She feels there has been no discussion concerning this since it was done. She strongly supports the Parks/Recreation being its' own department. Director Cutler said that specific feedback is needed from the Parks Commission. The City Manager and council members have said they are comfortable with how the organization is currently responding to the needs of the community. They feel they have been able to provide better service in the parks area (reducing equipment, overhead, attack problems quickly). The City Manager has not heard negative comments concerning service levels of various programs. If there are specific issues and concerns they need to be articulated on what they are and shared with the City Manager, Councilmembers Munro, Erickson and Braun. Commission member Hordyk reiterated that she would like this added to the 2006 Priority List; she would like to have it reviewed in writing, with cost breakdown. Commission member Rodriguez concurred with the request. She would also like to review and re-address the separation of the department as she has heard from residents who have concerns. She expressed her frustration at the Council for their disregard of the citizens who spoke during the Council meeting. . Commission member Tschimperle agreed with this request. She would also like to N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Park Board Min Ian 06.doc M -L 28 . . . Miscellaneous Items Member Terms Election 4/16/06 By-Laws/Ordinance Status of Deputy Director of Recreation Recruitment Shane Park Update Other Items see, on paper, a review that states that the reorganization of the ParkslRecreation Department is more efficient than the previous organization. Following short discussion all Commission members agreed this review should go forth. Director Cutler asked what the Parks Commission is specifically looking for with this review. What is not being provided that you wish provided? Commission member Tschimperle responded that they are looking for accountability, not with projects, but with documented proof that the efficiency of separating the parks department from the recreation division is working. Commission member Hordyk reminded everyone that when the reorganization happened, everyone was told that they would return and review this to see ifit really worked. After a year, she wants to know if it really is working. The Olympic Discovery Trail should continue to receive the attention it needs. The 2005 and 2006 Work Plans were reviewed and discussed. There are quite a few goals to accomplish. Staff discussed the recreation division's Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. Three of the Parks Commission member's terms are up on February 28, 2006. Currently, two have expressed interest in continuing for another term. The upcoming elections in April, for new officers were discussed. The latest By-Laws and Ordinance governing the Parks, Recreation and Beautification Commission were presented for Park Commission's information. Staff reported that the applications would close on January 30. Candidates will be chosen and interviewed in February. Staff reported that Shane Park would not be used this year. Quite a few problems have slowed down the construction, which, turn put off the seeding schedule. Even if everything had been perfect, the field still needs a year for the grass to take hold. Arrangements are currently being formulated to move those sports programs, which use Shane Park, to other fields. When school is out in June, the Dry Creek Field will be maintained by the city for use by sports programs. Erickson Tennis Court renovation was briefly discussed. Commission member Tschimperle suggested installing a fence in the area of the "memorial" near the duck pond on the Waterfront Trail to detour the current activity surrounding it. There is still no response from students to volunteer to sit on the Parks, Recreation and Beautification Commission. The audience was thanked for their attendance and participation. Commission member Shargel presented an update and overview of the 2006 Senior Games. Eleanor Tschimperle, Senior Center Financial volunteer presented an overview of the memberships at the Center since the fees were increased. City residents are N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Park Board Min Jan 06.doc 29 M --3 - continuing to purchase their memberships, but county resident membership purchases are slowing down. The complaints have been at a minimum. The next skate park meeting will be held in late February or early March. The Dream Playground Foundation will be more involved in the future. Benches have been ordered for Mrs. McRevey. The replacement restrooms at Erickson Park are still being negotiated. June I sl is the target date for completion. Staff updated the commission on the Pool presentations being made to community service club. Commission member Whidden asked what the Swim Club paid for use of the pool during the swim meet. Staff responded that they paid for a lifeguard and supervisor for the weekend. Adjournment Commission member Shargel motioned for adjournment. Commission member Rodriguez seconded. Upon call for the question, motion carried unanimously. Next Meeting February 16, 2006 7:00 pm Vem Burton Center Meeting Room. N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Park Board Min Jan 06.doc '. M :- 4~O . . . . . . City of Port Angeles Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission Port Angeles, Washington February 16,2006 - Meeting Notes CALL TO ORDER- REGULAR MEETING: ROLL CALL: Approval of Minutes January 19,2006 Items From Audience not on Agenda: Discussion Items: Miscellaneous Upates Elks Playground Equipment Skate Board Park Improvements Chairman, Chuck Whidden called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission to order at 7:00 p.m in the Vem Burton Community Center meeting room Members Present: Jean Hordyk, David Shargel, and Chuck Whidden Members Absent: Ron Johnson, Damaris Rodriguez, Diana Tschimperle and Jack Harmon Staff Present: William Sterling, Deputy Director of Recreation, Glenn Cutler, Director of Public Works & Utilities, Marl A. Bilsborrow, and Councilmember, Lauren Erickson Audience: Eleanor Tschimperle, Scott Johns and Taylor Jennings. Chairman Whidden announced that since a quorum is not present, tonight's meeting would proceed by virtue that items discussed would be informational only. Due to lack of a quorum, the January 2006 minutes will be approved at the March 16, 2006 meeting. Eleanor Tshimperle, Senior Center Guiding Committee representative, distributed the current Senior Center Newsletter and the Senior Center annual report and activity report. Deputy Director Sterling requested that various reports from the Recreation Division be added to the Parks Commission agenda. Public Works & Utilities Director Cutler informed the Parks Commission that there is a Policy and Procedure in place, which outlines criteria required to place an individual's name on the Community Memorial Wall. Two requests are anticipated for consideration during the March meeting. The Elks Club has recently ordered safety matting for the play equipment. Once the City receives the matting, the playground equipment will be installed using city crews. The Elks Club will supply volunteers to install the safety matting. The new Elks Playground equipment should ready for play on May 1,2006 or sooner. Staff distr,ibuted a drawing of the Skate Park area, which includes the proposed improvements. Staff reported that a meeting was held with the Rotary Nor'wester Club regarding the completion of the park improvements (sidewalks, landscaping, fencing and signage). The estimated costs for the remaining improvements are $20-30,000. The Council Parks & Facilities Oversight Committee has reviewed and will recommend to the City Council that the City take over the remaining items. The items will be completed after reviewing the final scope. N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Park Board Notes Feb 06'i:!c _ 31 - 1 - Lions Park Park Open Space Discussion Dry Creek Bridge Grant Tree Removal at Lincoln Park Deputy Director of Recreation Interviews Erickson ParkPrototype Restroom Status Erickson Park Tennis Court Re-build Status A meeting was held on February 14,2006, with a representative of the Lions Club regarding the status of the Lions Park improvement Project. The Lions Club is still committed to "adopt" this project. However, their commitment would not be financial although volunteer labor or in-kind services would be available. This park is not identified in the present 5-year CFP, therefore an action plan would need to be developed in phases in order for this project to proceed. . Director Cutler suggested that Port Angeles take funds generated from Sub-Division developments and invest them into larger parks instead of "pocket parks". But, if the developers insist on a small park area, add this to the homeowner's responsibility. Staff would like the Park Commission to review this concept and make a recommendation to the EDC Department for their discussion and consideration. This concept also needs to be forwarded to the Council Community Development Subcommittee as well as the Parks and Facilities Oversight Committee for discussion. Scott Johns, Associate Planner for Department of Community Development, stated that in 2004, a plan to implement an impact fee for parks was started. The initial request was routed through the Planning Commission where it stalled due to unanswered questions of what the dollar amount should be. Recently there has been direction to move this forward; it is in the works. This item will be placed on the Parks Commission agenda for future discussion. The City received a $73,000 IAC Grant to begin the planning of the trail bridge over Dry Creek and for the planning of the Western Trail extensions for the Olympic Discovery Trail to the Lower Elwha Bridge. City staff has started preliminary planning work. Possible tree removal was discussed. The Parks Commission will be updated as information comes in. . Twenty-eight applications were received; nine were selected for interviews. Interviews are scheduled for Thursday, February 23 and Friday, February 24, 2006. Two members of the Parks Commission will also be interviewing the candidates. The supplier for the pre-cast restroom at Erickson Park has been selected and wid be recommended to the City Council. The Parks and Facilities Council Committee has recently recommended an additional amount of $25,000, to help purchase the unit. Council will consider the recommendations atthe City Council meeting of February 21,2006. If approved, the unit will be purchased and be operational by June 1, 2006, or sooner. The City, in cooperation with the Peninsula Tennis Club, is preparing a request for grant funds to replace the existing 5 courts with 4 new courts at Erickson Park. The City is waiting for a proposal from Atlas to accomplish the replacement. At this time, the estimated cost for the project is $125,000. The City plans to request a grant from the United States Tennis Association for $25,000 and a grant of $5,000 from the local UST A. In addition, the Peninsula Tennis Club has indicated they will . provide a $20,000 cash donation (or in-kind services). With these commitments in hand the City costs will be $75,000. The grant request will have to be in by September 15, 2006, therefore, City Council will have to concur with the project by then. Construction would be scheduled for Spring of2007. This project will need to be outlined in the Capital Facilities Projects for 2007. Staff reported that there is now a group proposing to cover three of the courts. Discussion ensued regarding the height needed for the building needed to cover the courts. . N:\CCOUNCI~\FINAL\Park Board Notes Feb 06'i:!c _ 32 - 2 - . . . Swim Pool Siting Status Presentations to various local service clubs are continuing; about 350 people have been contacted. An Open House was held on February 9,2006 in order to gather additional public input. Approximately 50 citizens were in attendance. The Pool Oversight Committee is scheduled to meet on March 8, 2006 to make a recommendation of a pool site to the City Council. City Council is scheduled to take public input at a Special Council meeting on April 11, 2006. The Pool Survey has been completed and the results will be presented at the Pool Oversight Committee meeting on March 8, 2006. ,r' Staff suggested the Park Commission discuss and make their recommendation to Council regarding the pool siting. Miscellaneo us Information and discussion regarding the Parks & Recreation re-organization ensued. Information was distributed to those present. Further discussion by the Commission may be held at a later date. Adjournment Meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. Next Meeting March 16, 2006 7:00 pm Vern Burton Center Meeting Room #3 N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Park Board Notes Feb 06.~c _ 33 - 3 - . . . M- 34 ' PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT FOR MARCH, 2006 CHANGE ORDERS FOR ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (COSTS SHOWN INCLUDE APPLICABLE TAXES) ~ PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL PREVIOUS CHANGE REVISED TITLE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS CONTRACT AMOUNT ORDERS THIS AMOUNT MONTH Elwha Elec. UG Extension $220,000 $202,466.85 $0.00 $0.00 $202,466.85 02-11 WUGA Utility Ext. 05-01 $3,300,000 $3,067,083.08 $104,870.68 $0.00 $3,171,953.76 Shane Pk Drainage 05-14 $290,000 $209,800.93 ($43,317.12) $0.00 $166,583.81 PALF Stormwater 05-16 $685,000 $641,654.12 $0.00 $0.00 $641,654.12 Park/Campbell Imp 04- $716,000 $674,658.24 $190,096.95 $0.00 $864,755.19 04/05-12 . Oak/Laurel Outfall 05-24 $95,000 $55,210.26 $21,120.50 $8,669.69 $85,000.45 Muni. Pier Repairs 03-18 $450,000 $434,212.00 $0.00 $0.00 $434,212.00 * Small Works Project CONTRACTS/PURCHASE ORDERS APPROVED BY CITY MANAGER (COSTS SHOWN INCLUDE APPLICABLE TAXES) CONTRACTOR Project- DESCRIPTION AMOUNT OR VENDOR PO # PROJECT ADVERTISE BID OPENING START .END TITLE FOR BIDS CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION Cedar Street Wall March 12, 2006 April 14, 2006 April, 2006 June, 2006 05-22 . P ALF Shoreline March 5, 2006 April 7, 2006 May 2006 Fall 2006 Stabilize 02-21 "A" St. Substation March 26, 2006 April 19, 2006 May 2006 August 2006 04-16 Water Utility April 2, 2006 April 24, 2006 May 2006 November 2006 Materials 06-13 Lincoln Street April 9, 2006 April 27, 2006 May 2006 August 2006 f;orm 05-13 ront St. April 9, 2006 April 27, 2006 May 2006 ,kme 2006 Streetscape 06-08 MA-'f UPCOMING PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS (NEXT 30 DAYS, ESTIMATED DATES SHOWN ) N:\PWKS\ENGINEER\Management Reports\Change Orders\Change Orders 2006\2-06.doc M - 35 Project Description Project Total GrantlLoan Source & Grant Match or Award Status Cost Cost Loan Data Listing CSO/Stormwater Centennial Grant Loan rates and grant matches June 2006 Application Projects $32,000,000 SRF & PWTF Loans vary with programs filed $ Vary with Program Eastern Corridor $430,000 SAFETEA-LU Grant: 15.6% ($67,000) February Selected Entryway, Phase II Enhancement Grant minimum match. City 2006 $363,000 $25,000, City $41,000 in-kind Dry Creek Bridge & $93,000 lAC Grant: 22% ($20,460) local November Selected Trail Planning $72,540 match 2005 . Stormwater Phase II $75,000 DOE Phase II Grant January Selected Implementation Municipal 2006 Assistance Stormwater $75,000 PUBLIC WORKS GRANT & LOAN APPLICATION STATUS REPORT MARCH, 2006 TIB, AlP: TIB, PSMP: Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee DOE administered grant lIoan funding for water quality improvement projects Drinking Water State Revolving Fund InterAgency Committee for Outdoor Recreation Public Works Trust Fund WSDOT administered grant program for School Route safety improvements Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient, Transportation Equity Act, a Legacy for Users. WSDOT administered federal highway grant funding for intermodal transportation projects. Transportation Improvement Board, Arterial Improvement Program . Transportation Improvement Board, Pedestrian Safety and Mobility Program BRAC: Centennial: DWSRF: lAC: PWTF: Safe Routes to School: SAFETEA-LU: r:\PW~S\ENGINEER\Management Reports\Grants & Loans\Grants & Loans 06\2-06.doc . M - 36 BROWN AND CALDWELL CONTRACT . PROJECT: Various Wastewater Consulting Services PROJECT NO.: US 05-04 DATE AGREEMENT SIGNED BY COUNCIL: February 17. 2005 AUTHORIZED AMOUNT: $249.288.00 DATE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT SIGNED: December 20.2005 AGREEMENT EXPIRES: July 31.2006 BILLINGS THRU: January 26. 2006 1. CSO Comprehensive Plan $80,000.00 $29.995.42 $65,000.00 $60,063.30 92% . Update 2. Treatment Plant Re-rating $85,000.00 $79,990.33 $90,000.00 $97,087.63 108% 3. Directed Wastewater Services $50,000.00 $49,986.50 $8,000.00 $7,804.43 98% a. Sewer modeling for WUGA sewer facility plan $54,700.00 $0.00 $64,700.00 $62,752.78 I 4. Sewer Facility Plan 97% 5. East UGA Sewer Pre-Design* $0.00 $0.00 $34,588.00 $32,355.18 94% Totals $269,700.00 $159,972.25 $262,288.00 $260,063.32 99% *Funded by the County . M - 37 1-- e CH2M HILL WATER CONTRACT . PROJECT: Various Water System Related Consulting Services PROJECT NUMBER: US04-11 DATE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT SIGNED BY COUNCIL: October 19. 2004 AMENDMENT NO.3 TO AGREEMENT APPROVED: August 16. 2005 AGREEMENT EXPIRES: October 31. 2006 BILLINGS THROUGH: February 24.2006 1. Elwha Dam Removal $100,000.00 $71,759.00 $71,759.00 $24,316.63 34% 2. Phase 2 of Concrete $225,000.00 $224,160.00 $1,151.01 $1,151.01 100% Cylinder Pipeline Replacement - Cancelled e 3. Vulnerability Assessment $15,000.00 $15,423.00 $9,430.00 $9,429.64 100% . Capital Improvement Plan - Done 4. Emergency Response Plan $10,000.00 $14,436.00 $20,928.00 $21,521.36 103% - Done 5. Fairmount Pump Station $30,000.00 $28,581.00 $6,163.00 $6,162.94 100% Construction Support Services - Done 6. Update Scope & Estimates $5,000.00 $3,663.00 $3,663.00 $0.00 0% for CFP Water Projects 7. Directed Services $25,000.00 $9,978.00 $19,165.00 $0.00 0% 8. West UGA Utilities Design $470,000.00 NA $495,220.00 $495,220.02 100% - Done 9. General Sewer Plan $65,000.00 NA $62,472.00 $23,105.06 37% Amendment - Done 10. WUGA Construction $80,000.00 NA $80,127.00 $42,920.01 54% Support Services Totals $1,025,000.00 $368,000.00 $770,078.01 $623,826.67 81% e . CH2M Hill Contract #04-11, Invoice #35545571, March 10.~06_ 38 . EXELTECHCONTRACT PROJECT: 8th Street Bridge Replacements PROJECT NUMBER: US02-15 DATE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT SIGNED BY COUNCIL: November 4. 2003 DATE AMENDMENT NO.1 TO AGREEMENT SIGNED: N/A AGREEMENT EXPIRES: Phase 1. 7/31/04: Phase 2. 12/31/04: Phase 3. 7/31/05: Phase 4.7/31/06 BILLINGS THRU: Feb 28. 2006 Phase 1 - Alternatives Analysis $61,363.25 $306,816.27 $284,138.49 $284,138.49 100% and TS&L Studies Phase 2 - NEPA/SEPA Studies $145,600.71 $728,003.56 $704,299.01 $704,299.01 100% & Documentation and . Preliminary Design Phase 3 - Final Design & Plans $162,486.70 $812,433.49 $1,172,107.52 $1,153,883.29 98% and Specifications & Estimate Phase 4 - Construction $0.00 $801,583.25 $1,677,212.97 $30,837.01 2% Management Management Reserve*** $10,000.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 Totals $379,450.66 $2,698,836.57 $3,837,757.99 $2,173,157.80 57% * City's 20% BRAC Grant match for obligated Preliminary Engineering and Design Phases. Construction is 100% funded and matching funds are not required. ** Amendment No.1 approved by Council 6/7/05 in the amount of $181,219.00 Amendment NO.2 approved by Council February 7,2996; $977,702.42 *** Mgm't. Reserve shifts approved 9/16/06 $30,000 & 1/20/06 $20,000 . M - 39 PARAMETRIX CONTRACT e PROJECT: Solid Waste and Wastewater Related Consulting Services . PROJECT NUMBER.: US05;.06 DATE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT SIGNED BY COUNCIL: . January 21.2005 DATE AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT SIGNED: 8/15/05 AGREEMENT EXPIRES: June 30. 2006 BILLINGS THROUGH: Jan 28. 2006 1. Engineering Assistance $105,769 $105,769 $111,758.19 '$111,758.19 100% 2..Permitting & Compliance $75,261 $75,261 $53,620.34 $53,620.34 100% 3. Waste Export System . $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 0% 4. Design Services $238,499 $238,499 $388,678.30 $388,678.30 100% e 5. NPDES Permit Support $0 $0 $2,781.93 $2,781.93 100% 6. Construction Support $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00 0% 7. Directed Services $50,000 $50,000 $0.00 $0.00 0% 8. PAWTP/PATS Soils Mgmnt $0 $0 $80,000.00 $50,641.84 63% Totals $469,529 $469,529 $636,838.76 $607,480;60 95% . · Amendments and Internal task fee adjustments. $37,309.76 transferred 2/21/06 from 2006 directed services to the 2005 agreement to close all tasks with the exception of task 8, which has been extended to 6/30/06 for completion of Transfer Station Grading Operations. e . PAYMENT NO. 13 INVOICE NO. 01-65043; February 16, 2006 M - 40 ..., \0 I- o&, 0(1) N~ >> 1.- ra.c :::s..., c c ra 0 "'iE . . . " ',>'" "",'.,"',',,' ,',,',', .'/""',)\1ission Statement: >c ,in,{R9rt!ie",~hip;;"dti!,iJ'utcomjnunity, th~ Port Angeles Police Department . ",,;~e54~~!~?i~it~,:''njissiQntos;/rve ina cO"1pCtssionate, courteous, andprofessional o;'!1an,>>~&.ilflt~blf1oteJfeedomandp~,qqeof."Ji;ui, pride in our neighborhoods, 'i'~'ir~,-;,"" ~:\" "':iand the safety of our families. !'.: ~;:~ '! -,' :":, , it:'j1j."r,'!"~'~~{',,:; ; . ,,.,r,..1;:>;,.~ "~,,.ry ~.~-. .~Jr;r==- " January 2006 ',' Statistical Highlights ,_ In January 2006, the Part I Crim~ofTheft had the highest number of incidents'reported with 71 for the month. Thisis nearly one and a half times greater than the numberreported in J amufry 2005 of 49. Thefts, frol1J.Y~h~Gleswere' ~,.__: __: ':":~__' ;:." :':~.1'::;~":'?~'::_;~~'?r--~:J."::r_::",..:':_-.,_'-> the gre~testnumber oftheftsr~pg~~g,~Wlotalof: 19 f()rfhe, month. This is 46%"gf~~i~2}tti.~~the' , ',-,," .. .-:;" ,', ....'- -" '-, - . n~mb'er~f Thefts from V ehic1esil1J.~tlUflry" , ,".,' 2005 of 13. While January 2006Thefts~a:re-"t- significantly greater thanth~Jl,llmberreported :. ,-' -- i .; ,',,; -;. (.- ~,' ): "; ::"i:~ _ - ^ in January 2005, this represents,)ll-.??(cJ .. reduction in the number ~f criJi';i~~~8rt~~:, ; " ., ,':, . " (." ,~,y :'1 i-. ,,'~ -,' . ; ,-': compared with December 2005 of84 cnmes reported. , . -, __, ' j., __ ~', " ' ': -', _.,.-.:, -i __ ,-" ',-'-'.-::-', ," ..c-. i . Assault 4th De,greevvas'~~~'S~C,?~d.i~~~~~sf number of crimes reported for thep1~;nt~with '. 19 crimes reported. Thldis i4<%'lJ;s!ti1~ri'ljs't" . :,", 'o<_':_~ ':,--,' ,_+-:>_~.<:",:-.:<. .' yeardli'ring the same m~nth ~he~~~~;c~m~~,' .',,:./ ~ "', _.c ",: ~ l' :-:','< '. - were reported. . "_to'. January had one reportedRap~aridighe :-. :" " . ; <':'(, '__ ,.:~",:,:.. "~.':'1':;.;".!:t~_.,:~rf~i';/-' reported Robbery compared\vith none'Tor the -- '_':, ";: --'~, -:-: ,.-.,::, ~i"'<';'_"".l"":__':':"; , same time period during the~tevi~~~Yt:;ar.' . January had four reportedFe'1~ny::~ssaults : _ ,<'; " ":'-:';'(-\'i':,",(-: 1;":1 compared with 3 during J anmiry'of?pb} One of these crimes was actually theY~hicular Homicide case where an 18 year old male. was - ,,_:; , -,_" (, .. ',L'...' ;, ..:' . > ~: arrested and charged. Twoofth~'?th~i9~~'es,' als() resulted in arrests with felony assault charges pending. In January there were 13 Burglaries reported. This is 19% less than the number reported during January 2005 of 16. Three of ~hes~.cases\V~re9leared bY,t~e ,arre~t of at least oneihdividuaI. N()tably, one .case irlVqlYecJ ,;, ; several jl.l.v:enUes'breakirig' arid eritb1hg stotag~ are~s at'the Penins~la Golf Course with several ':'gHif carts being used to damage the golf course greens. This incident also involved alcohol use by some of the juveniles contacted. ':, :' ~.. :' ". : ." : - .': " t,:', ,~ : . Therewere two reported Arsons in January 2006, compared with the one reported in January2bb5. , ' Overall, ~art 1 C~mesi!~~po~;ed <i~p,~g' the l11onthofJan~~~r 2006t~~ciI l,i l~ whichiis,' a~proximatel~r~% gr~ater them the_number r~po~edin'!~hua~t::805,b~94 c~nl~~'i,/ .... ......, , 57 AdJIts \vere ~rrested in Jiu1uary^i006, i --,' ',' :', , :_ '_ _ . ~..: ~_ " i -, > ! ',' -'f:' '; -: ~~i~h i~ significa~t1y less thail the 83 arrests ... during Janu~ry 20?5. 35 JuvenIles were arrested during that same month, which is significantly greater than the number of juvenile arrests during the same monthin 2005 of2'1. IIi total, there were 92 arrests during January 2006, which reflects a decrease of l2%co~~aredtoY,1e 104 arrests during the same period l~t year. . . . Page 2 ***************************************************************** * * : POLICE VOLUNTEERS : * * * * . : Our Police Department Volu.nteersprovide many hours of service. DuringJanuary of: : 2006, our police volunteersd'efucated hours in the following categories: . : * * * * : Events' 0.0: : Office work ",,";:" 59.0 : : Radar/spee~w~~sl). 82.0 : : Vacation home;checks 6.0 : : Bank Run 19.0: * * * Night Patrols 15.0 * * * * Other details 16.0 * * * * .....''". ',""C":'.. "'*:' : The office time is spent processingp~~Ilslips andm(iilingno,tificatio)Js to other law enforcement agencies, :. : making copies for court and prosecutors and assisting in the City Attorney's office and District Court. :' * They are an integral part of the Port ,Angeles Police Department. * *. .'. . * *.~ .-' . , " -. i (j "'~-,; ;' ,"; *' *...,. . . - . . - . . -., .., ,~. ,. . - . . -. . - . . - . . - . . - * *. ,'\.\.' *. * * *' * $: (TQtal Yo.<I.. uIi.feer hours for January~',~006 $:' .. . *. 198 *; *' . .: :.: * * * : .,'. ", . . *." ************************************************.*****************. . , " ... 1 - . " ,. . ;-' '-" ~ - .- > . - -- . RESERME~;POLIC'EO'FFIGER ' ......VQt~UNTEER',HbURS , ':~'.' l'~' i:t.~ ;'{, .;-. <t", ':";"f-j,,;U',? N .~"'~':~,"_;L",::I<;;H ";("'. Xq ~,'1I;.MR\ij~.~J9r),cgl1l9rY,.?9,QJ~" t; 51 Port Angeles Police Department currently has three active Reserve Police Officers (RPO). They voluIlteer many hours each month ridiIlg alopg with PoliceO~ficers, which ~rovides immediat,~; back tlP,Jo,f'QPr{o{ftce'rs; Qenerally;th~R~Sc~t\'e,sWQtIdduning the eve- ning and late night shifts. Reservesalsoperfqrrn ~n sex offender registration checks and vol- unteer their time at Community Ev,e'Q.ts;J:;:C;p rr . '10<'-"" ,:1:' .., . ....~., , J;mployee f\J7~S... . '." ". ~ . Ja.nuary brought the addition of two new officers. After the ,leh€;tiiyt~~tfu.g,pr()oess, Reserve Officers KevinSpencer.and Clay Rife were hired. Both officers brought their families with them during the swearing in ceremonies in January. .:~~i;~P2r of',P?lice[offio~r.caI1djg~t:~~G91J.f:;J~~ycl,9f...~~y~rf1+,f1PpliG~nts ..;'!:roIll;~lI.\?~Eft:~hestate. ". <~O;vv;i!fg~P",f1t.9w:~~@rve:OffigeI'S,r9Se :t01J;l~:u,'", . .i~!$K~~'r61ii~~,t;~:~~iwr,~~e~!\Il(!tr~p~q@a.Ui"'~~l~~If~~__ -';:-~:i:~ ' ".'c' ;";';,1':, i.:":',. -'-.-,:',"i::.._." ;.:-!,\- ;: . --....-,. ."., ,-. The Department is proud of our Reserve Program. The program is designed to select top individuals using the same priteria for hiring as the Police Officer ..' '. pos,itioIl. Before becoming a Reserve QfficElr, the candidatesmustc8IIlI>Jete ~ 25phour Reserve,Academy. ."",f!1ese h()urs are all volunteer and,the academy is conducted three ;'days'a'week for approximately5jnonths.Once completed, Reserve '19tficersvolunteer;tJheir tiffi~ WOI'~g generally with Patrol Officers. "'J. . , 'Officer Gerald SWayiYtt~cfl"~sjgnesI. astl1e SchoolJ{espu;qe Dmcer (SRO).. JIe,>>;\9*s,.olltoft~Y~9rtAngele~J:Iigh, School Security Qffigeapq,jsoQ c;~mp'u~ during thi entiI:e .; school day.SR6S~~yze~ls()resp()qds'to therni:ddl~aIld" gnide schools as necessary 'for 'issues 'a.~ they arise.'. The" ." charf to toe nght 'ihdiciies'iheadivity dUrlngJanuary,thaf required action by him; .",'~ ,i,J" :: 1 ". ~.~ :,-"J..,:, :~;~~'\:1-< Ltf;, ::.l':,:~!,:, I';Y ~;! '~;,_:':;~';' .~-, CJi{additiptttp,his, enfoi"G.ement aG,tions,<;lJ1.IJ.ing:~~llll?ry;.QffJ.~e.r Swa yze6t1S,9' 'rrepared;a ~m~nger P?llg~l" Rp\\,erppitl.t.KOl"kI(lmUt01J.~p~~oQl.f~J1lilit?s ;~PclG L~ ...... , taught aclassq.lleyidetlce~01lectiotl.f91" 'W~~fie~ce' program. . One interesting'" criminal incident that occurred duiing t&e:iri6nth was an arrest made for assault Weapon Incidents with the assistance of a video camera. This particular incident involved an ongoing harassment situation betweensiudenb;; i , . Officer SW~Y2:b:i~serving his third year as the School Resource Officer. The progranihas"b,e~p';a~~m~,Ctiv;~t(j()1 .... for law ,enforcement and continues toproyide positive reinforc.ement ofstudent and law enforcement relations.'. " .....: ".," -',', ': '. .. . '- ,- "".. -.' .. - ',.. - -' ".' " "." ,'" '....... -, -.," .:- ,'-'-', ..r .. ~ r.,' >'~,;~~>.~ ..,'. '. .> ~"i . . . PENCOM ACTIVITY ,"",,~,. . <"~'.:':f',.'i "'; > 'J:~~ '~~ ',..<;.~" ,~'\,"-~:::,"" '",,,:.,. ~: _.,-~~,~..".,,-,.. --'-<-,";.:^'......,~,,,... -. , ~--;-~,.,-...'. ,-,-.-:.-,, .'..,- ...,;.': , -~- ,~...~-_.. ""~"'" _..,~"'_''''''" ., ....,,,_.,..' '. .; ,;.~.l_;..::,__...:~'-.. .M~FlyYlpI-ATIONS <;2006 ; . 30 25 19 15 10 5 o ,?ro ro~ ..::P ro ~ ..!::- AO~ o,j.~ ~o ~v Q....... .~'l> ~o ~ ~" r_U .....fli ~ "CJ ~"J ~ o!::-Cf> _....ro<':$. W ~ '" c;;flJ rofli c;;~ e} is' ~ 0 iii Nav 2005 o Dee 2005 . Jan 2006 ,?ro ro~ ,Y l> !::-~ fli ,::,'?~ Cj . 50 45 40 35 30 25 I , __,_ ;. '.,n',._...._ "" D2qO~:~; ............ lil2006 . M 46 PART 1 CRIMES . . - Homicide Rape/Sex Offenses Robbery-All Assault-Felony Assault-4th Burglary-Residential Burglary-Other . .... Theft-Shoplifting Theft-from Vehicle Theft-from Bldg Theft:Vehicle.,.. .: ,",.. /,' -.',., ," ...,". ""'.-' ~ .~. ',' ,~,.. '. .. ..-,.. ", '- ' .....;.;;It1~ft;-Ofher:.' 'Afson~AH .,. ','v' .. ,,-. 'u, __. TotaL. . 'I . ),..-.( .,'!"I ','.~' (>;"''-'. . "',\ l" ~-~~;.~; ,:: ~~,__.i.~. ~~<.~ij ..." ;'r.;'.::,:" i. ~ . PART 2 CRIMES ,.."7 '. .~. . 7 2 3 . . .~4.- -+- 8 6 3 )> ::J 3' m .. )> 0- C en CD a. )> ::J 3' m .. o CD m a. )> ..2. , ::J c)> 3' Ci3::J m 0.3' T en OJ ~ 0'." 5 ~ 0" ~,:'>f:':'~';l.rt('-}~ft{g~~~~;j '() o )> 3 ::J ~ 3' ::5" ~ - en )> )> ::J ::J 3' 3' m m .... T Z (f) o "......,._..,......,...._".,',,:,....:.,...~.......,,~,.,.,,'.' ".":. >:'.....,..".~., -". .,.....- ~~:-\_~_:. :S:..:-;~Ci.j ,~<?-:o;~. \..,.--. '- ...:~.. > ,:\:\ ~:~; ", ~,;+><:'.",'i.'~:-:;:'~' _ ,.:~.~~~~.~1~~:::~ .....~" "!~>- :'i'''';: _ ;: :'.l~1\)~1 )> ::J 3' m .. < 0" o' c en )> ~. 3 m .. o - ~ CD .., )> ::J 3' m .. r o en - Parking Ticket Statistics ":-,:.;\:.,.' ".' . "'. -.~.:' '. :~-.-,.; -:,;:<>.~~:>~:;.:.:.~' . - .'.;,~ Feb Mar Apr May June "'Revenue 2006. ,- .;:'/,',';' "$2,430 ' : -'Tickets .. ;"-'(;2005 279 Revenue ;~W05 ''''':-~?~028 .. . Month ;.. Tiek6kf' 200q::.. , ,":':"""':;;":i 192'""] Jail :,:) .'\ Oet Nov Dee Total 192 $2,430 279 $2,028 . Page 8 'M ~48 . . . DATE: To: FROM: SUBJECT: FORT}\NGELES WAS H I N G TO N, U. S. A. CITY Co UN CIL.Me MO April 4, 2006 CITY COUNCIL Becky J. Upton, City Clerk/Management Assistant ~ Resignation from Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission The City is in receipt of a letter of resi~ation frolll Ms. Damaris Rodriguez, a member ofthe Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commissiol1, a copy of which is attached for your information.' ,".j-, "'-;-:-.'''." - -.','., ," Ms. Rodriguez served on the Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission since April, 2001, and she was recently reappointed to another four-year term. Staff plans to prepare a letter forthe Mayor's signature, on behalf ofthe City Council, accepting Ms. Rodriguez' resignation with regret. In addition, staff will proceed with the issuance of a news release seeking applicants to fill the vacancy for the unexpired term ending February 28, 2010. Attachment M - 49 March 28, 2006 . City of Port Angeles William A Sterling Parks, Recreation, and Beautification Commission 321 East 5th Street Port Angeles, W A 98362 Dear Bill and Parks Commission, I am tendering my resignation for my position on the board. I have enjoyed my time serving and like to think that somewhere down the line I might serve again. However due to some personal circumstances I believe that it is . in the best interest of the Parks Commission at this time for me to step down. I apologize for deciding this after my recent reappointment and if it would be helpful, I can continue until you find a replacement. I wish you all the best. Sincerely, ~=::~*o . M - 50 --I EXECUTIVE SESSION Date: IJ tfr,.! tJ1/ 66 I - Expected length of session: .~ Ji) fr1-)1t Is action expected following the session: Y.e-.S Reason for Executive Session: _ To consider matters affecting national security. _ To consider the selection of a site or the acquisition of real estate by lease or purchase when public knowledge regarding such consideration would cause a likelihood of increased price. To consider the minimum price at which real estate will be offered for sale or lease when public knowledge regarding such consideration would cause a likelihood of decreased price. However, final action selling or leasing public property shall be taken in a meeting open to the public. _ To review negotiations on the performance of public bid contracts when public knowledge regarding such consideration would cause a likelihood of increased costs. _ To consider, in the case of an export vading company, [mancial and commercial information supplied by private persons to the export trading company. _ To receive and evaluate complaints or charges brought against a public officer or employee. However, upon the request of such officer or employee, a public hearing or a meeting open to the public shall be conducted upon such complaint or charge. ,. ~ To evaluate the qualifications of an applicant for public employment or to review the performance of a public employee. However, subject to RCW 42.30.140(4), discussion by a governing body of salaries, wages, and other conditions of employment to be generally applied within the agency shall occur in a meeting open to the public, and when a governing body elects to take final action hiring, setting the salary of an individual employee or class of employees, or discharging or disciplining an employee, that action shall be taken in a meeting open to the public. To evaluate the qualifications of a candidate for appointment to elective office. However, any interview of such candidate and final action appointing a candidate to elective office shall be in a meeting open to the public. D( To discuss with legal counsel representing the agency matters relating to agency enforcement actions, or to discuss with legal counsel representing the agency litigation or potential litigation to which the agency, the governing body, or a member acting in an official capacity is, or is likely to become, a party, when public knowledge regarding the discussion is likely to result in an adverse legal or financial consequence to the agency. Closed session under RCW 42.30.140: _ To discuss proceedings concerned with the formal issuance of an order granting, suspending, revoking, or denying any license, permit, or certificate to engage in any business, occupation, or profession, or to receive a license for a sports activity or to operate any mechanical device or motor vehicle where a license or registration is necessary; or _ Meeting of a quasi-judicial body relating to a quasi-judicial matter between named parties as distinguished from a matter having general effect on the public or on a class or group. _ Matters governed by chapter 34.05 RCW, the Administrative Procedure Act. ~ Collective bargaining session with employee organization, including contract negotiations, grievance meetings, and discussions relating to the interpretation or application of a labor agreement or a portion of a meeting which the governing body is planning or adopting the strategy or position to be taken by the governing body during the course of any collective bargaining, professional negotiations, or grievance or mediation proceeding, or reviewing the proposals made in the negotiations or proceedings while in progress. Time session began: /b : ~ ~ J I ~ '2--~ Time session ended: Was session extended by announcement: y~ , /0 : 0''/ < If so, when: ~~~ ~e~J~ City Clerk ~eCA)hVr //: z3 G:\LEGALIFormsIEXECUTIVE SESSION-l O-17-05.wpd