HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 04/06/1999 pORTANGE AGENDA
LES_ CITY COUNCIL MEETING
W A $ H I N G r O N, U. $. A, 321 EAST FIFTH STREET
April 6, 1999
SPECIAL MEETING - 5:00 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING - 6:00 p.m.
AGENDA ITEM First Action ? Action Taken
, ;, , : : Page
A. CALL TO ORDER - Special Meeting (5:00 p.m.) 1
Conduct interviews to fill vacancies on Planning Commission
B. CALL TO ORDER - Regular Meeting (6:00 p.m.)
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Led by Camp Fire Group
CEREMONIAL MATTERS &
PROCLAMATIONS
Proclamation recognizing April 4 - 10, 1999,' as 21
"International Building Safety Week"
C. WORK SESSION
Policy discussion on abatable structures (memo &
report provided under separate cover)
D. LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON THIS OR FUTURE AGENDAS (By Cozmcil, Staffor Public) AND
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA (This is the opportunityJ&r members of the
public to speak to the City Council about anything not on the agenda, please keep comments to 5-10 minutes.)
E. FINANCE
F. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City Council minutes - March 15 and March 23 Action
16, 1999 27
2. Extension of wholesale water agreement with 35
Clallam County P.U.D.
3. Request by architect for increase in fees for 37
library work
G. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
H. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS
Municipal Code amendment - Electrical Code 41 Action
I. RESOLUTIONS NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
April 6, 1999 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - I
AGENDA ITEM First Action ? Action Taken
Page
J. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Approval for loan applications to Public Works 45
Trust Fund for 8th Street reconstruction and
covering two water reservoirs
K. PUBLIC HEARINGS- QUASI-JUDICIAL
(7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter)
L. PUBLIC HEARINGS- OTHER
Street Vacation Petition - Davis - STV 99-01 - 49 Action
vacating a portion of the "P" Street right-of-way
abutting Suburban Lot 84 between Milwaukee
Drive and 16th Street
M. INFORMATION
1. City Manager's Report (Page 61)
2. Review of Clallam County Opportunity Fund proposal (Page 65)
3. Report regarding feasibility study on conference center (Page 83)
4. Information regarding Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce (Page 85)
5. Personnel justification- Firefighter (Page 89)
6. Draft resolution revising City's policy for payment of expenses at certain City functions (Page 91)
7. Planning Commission minutes - March 10, 1999 (Page 95)
8. Draft Utility Advisory Committee minutes - March 15, 1999 (Page 101)
9. Humane Society Report - February, 1999 (Page 105)
N. EXECUTIVE SESSION (As needed and determined by City Attorney?
O. ADJOURNMENT I IActi°n
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings are set by the City Council in order to meet legal requirements pertaining to matters such as, land use permit applications, proposed
amendments to City land use regulations, zoning changes, annexations. In addition, the City Council may set a public hearing in order to receive
public input prior to making decisions which impact the citizens. Certain matters may be controversial, and the City Council may choose to seek public
opinion through the public hearing process.
G:',EXCHANGI~',AG EN DA,040699CC WI~D
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
April 6, 1999 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - 2
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 1999
I. CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING: ~.' ~ ~0,,p ~
II. ROLL CALL:
Members Present:
Mayor Braun
Councilman Campbell
Councilman Doyle
Councilman Hulett
Councilmember McKeown
Councilman Wiggins
Councilman Williams
Staff Present: Other Staff Present:
Manager Ibarra ~ ~. ,A.~., n~) .
Attomey Knutson
Clerk Upton (/,~-' ·
B. Becker
S. Brodhun ~. /~-~~
B. Collins
K. Godbey
S. Ilk
J. Pittis
III. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION:
Reason: ~-o~~,
Approxl'~nate L~/ngth:
IV. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION:
V. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
d'/ /
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Attendance Roster
DATE OF MEETING: April 6, 1999
LOCATION: City_ Council Chambers
City of Port Angeles
Ordinance/Resolution Distribution List
City Council Meeting of A~'O /~; .] ~
City Manager
City Atty. (l)
City Clerk
Peri.el
Cust. Svcs.
Fin~ D~.~.
Poli~ Dept.
F~e Dept.
Li~t D~t.
P~ks & R~.
~SC (1)
Ex~a Copies
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: Apd16,1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Brad Collins, Planning Director
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk/Management Assistant
SUBJECT'- Interviews for Vacancies on Planning Commission
and Board of Adjustment
Over the past few months, the City has been advertising to fill vacancies on Boards & Commissions.
There are presently two (2) vacancies on the Planning Commission and, as of this date, the City has
received seven (7) applications.
Two special meetings have been scheduled for the City Council so that interviews can be conducted.
The first special meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 6, 1999, at 5:00 p.m., and the second
meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 20, 1999, also at 5:00 p.m. Interviews have been scheduled
as follows:
Tuesday, April 6, 1999 Tuesday, April 20, 1999
5:00 p.m. William Hawthorne Frank McPhee
5:15 p.m. Loran Olsen Bob Philpott
5:30 p.m. Fred Norton Theresa Schmid
5:45 p.m. Jason Robotkay
Copies of the applications are attached for your review. Also attached are some suggested questions
that you may wish to ask while conducting the interviews.
The members of the Planning Commission review and make recommendations to the City Council
on land development actions including preparation of the City's comprehensive plan, which is the
framework for land development within the City, and zoning regulations. The Commission may also
make recommendations to individual City departments for adoption of land use controls.
The Planning Commission has specific authority vested by the City Council to act as heatings board
and approval body for certain land use issues, such as conditional use permits and shoreline
activities. Regular meetings are conducted where testimony from interested parties is given
significant consideration prior to decisions being made by the Commission. Commission members
are ultimately responsible to the City Council.
Planning Commissioners are appointed to four-year terms, with a limit of two consecutive terms.
The Commission meets the second and fourth Wednesday of each month, at 7:00 p.m., in the City
Council Chambers at City Hall. Members of the Planning Commission and their term expirations
are: Mary Craver - March 1, 2003; Robert King - March 1, 2000; Fredric Hewins - March 1, 2001;
Linda Nutter - March 1, 2002; and Dean Reed - March 1, 2000. The two vacant positions were held
by Cindy Souders, who has completed two full terms of office and is ineligible for reappointment,
and Paul Ziakin, who resigned due to employment elsewhere.
It is expected that, during the meeting of April 20, 1999, the City Council can proceed with
appointments to fill the vacancies on the Planning Commission. One appointment would be for the
term ending March 1, 2003, and the other term would be for the unexpired term ending March 1,
2002.
Attachments: Copies of Applications
Suggested Questions
2
pOR.TANC;I LI S
W A S H I N G T O N, U, S. A.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY CLERK
Application for Appointment to a Board, Commission, or Committee
Board, Commission, or Committee to which you are seeking appointment
Board or Commission Full Name
Board or Commission Full Name
Board or Commission Full Name
Applicant Name and General Information
First MI Last Birthd~e (i~v~/D/Y)
-7
Home street address
City State Zip Code
Home phone number Work phone number
OAr; yr~oi~cCu~ateintOl~ aac~; c['mOp~o;tle;n~ensfor~tiO~reCiy~l: :n:itizen of the United States?
/q\ '-- ..'%
Are you a City resident?/~es]No Do you ow~/mana§e a business i~ the City,2"Yes ,No
Do you hold any pro£cssional licenses, rc§istratio~ or cc~ficatcs in any Qcld (list bclow)7/~es~o
Arc you aware of any conflict of interest w.h~ch~mi§ht arise by your service on a City Board or Commission? If so,
please explain:
In compliance with the American Disabilities Act, if you will need special accommodations because of a physical
limitation, please contact the City Clerk, 417-4634, so appropriate arrangements can be made.
(ov£a)
3
Work Experience
List most recent experience first (or elaborate on a resume if you prefer)
Employer Your Title / Fre/m (:M/Y) To (M/Y)
Briefjob description .'Q ,~--,~ c~ ~
Employer Your Title ,'~rom (M/Y) / To (M/Y)
Brief job description '
Employer A~our Title "' t' From (M/Y),./ To (M/Y) ' -
Eel-cation
List most recent experience first /~f /
Institution/Location Credits earned/Major area of study Graduated?
Institution/Location Credits earned/Major area Graduated?
Institution/Location Credits earned/Major area of study Graduated?
Oharitable, Social, anel ~i¥ic Activities anel M~mb~rships
List major activities you have participated in during the last five years
Organization and location Group's purpose/objective # of members
Brief description of your participation
Organizatio~ and location ' , / Group's purpose/objective # of members
Brief description of your participation / ./,~
..... Applicant Signature t' Date
Submit completed forms to: Office of the City Clerk, City of Port Angeles, 321 E. 5th Street, P. O. Box 1150,
Port Angeles, Washington, 98362 1/99
4
WILLIAM S. HAWTHORNE ,.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
Business Address:
119 E. 7th St..
Port Angeles, WA 98362
(360) 452- 1848
LEGAL Gonzaga University School 'ofEaw. S15okane, WA.
EDUCATION: Awarded J.D., May 14, 1994. GPA 2.77 _
* Linden Cup, T6p 10-B~St O/-alist;/t,7.
PRE-LEGAL Eastern Washington University. Cheney, ~3/A.
EDUCATIOI~: B.S., lune I991- GP~ 3~78
Major: Developmental Psychology
* President, N-ationalH~0nor Society of P-gychotogy
* National Dean's List __
LEGAE Attorney at Law, S-elfEmployed
EXPERIENCE: ~
Experience: GeneralPi-act/ce including crirnina!
law, real property, estate planning and domestic relations..
Guardian Ad Litem, Grays Harbor County
Experience: Represented minors in establishment
of parentage proceedings, support enforcement and
contempt proceedings. ~
Legal Intern, Ufiiversity EegaYgCSSiStar~ce.
N. 1220 Dakota, Spokane, WA.99226 !
Experience: Functioneffas a R-ul~ 9intern under
supervising attomeys. Case load included domestic relations,
property, consumer protection, constitutional and criminal law.
Law CIerk, EgpositO, Tombarid George, T0plifl~ &'Campbell.
960 Paulsen Center, Spokane, WA. _
EXperience: Eegal l~esearcIi~ di-afling motions, bfiefg and
memoranda, limited representation of clients in bankruptcy-
proceedings. Primary areas of taw experience were in corporate and
commercial law. -
EXPEKIENCE~. Board of A-djustment, City of Cl~eney, WA.
Experience: Evaluate applications for various zoninguses.
Review appeals of decisions l~y the city bU~Tdi-ng department.
Community Activity, Cheney, WA.
Experience: Headed a group which successfully
participated in modifying the city charter to .~
allow f~or haitiative andKe£erendum. Primary
responsibility was legal research in municipal,
constitutionaY and- Zoning 'law.
Administration, Spokane ARC, Spokane, WA
Experience: Participated in creating ~nd
implementing training programs in coordination
with' S~pokane Transit AuthOrity to engble
developmentally disabled individuals tb function
independentIy usi~ng the l~us system. InclUded
accessing and drafting successful grant z
appIieations through' the Social Secq~rity
Administration and the Department6f Labor and
Indusfries.
Shop Chairman, Local 54, Bally's Park Place
Casino, Atlantic City, N.J. _
Experience: Labor representation, including
mediation and initiation of grievance procedures.
Participated in drafting new union charter for
labor negotiations. Supervised twenty eight, shop
stewards representing approximately five thousand
employees ....
6
QUESTIONS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CANDIDATES
1. What are some of the strengths and weaknesses about the land use planning that has been
done in Port Angeles and what new planning policies would help in the future?
2. What is the relationship between the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan?
3. You are in favor of a project that violates the City's Zoning Ordinance, what actions can you
take?
4. Vacant buildable land is in short supply for what type of zones in Port Angeles and why do
you think this is so?
CITY OF PORT ANG6LE$
CITY CLERK
Application for Appointment to a Board, Commission, or Committee
Board, Commission, or Committee to which you are seeking appointment
Board or Commission Full Name
Board or Commission Full Name
Board or Commission Full Name
Applicant Name and General Information
First Last MI Birthdate tM/D/Y)
Home street address
City State Zip Code
HOme phon~ n~be~ Work phone
Ce~ification and Location Information c~,~
v
Do you hold any p~of=ssioa=] liccas=s, ~=Sis~fio= o~ ce~cates ~ ~y field (list below)?
~e you aware of an~ co~ict of ~te~est which ~ht arise by yo~ scarce on ~ Ci~ Board or Co~ssion? If so,
~ . . .... ~ ~ ~ . .
In compliance wi~ the ~enc~ D~sabfl~t~es Act, tf you ~11 need specml accomodat~ons because of a physical
l~tation, please contact ~e CiW Oerk, 417-4634, so appropriate anangemen~ can be ~de.
(ov~)
8
Work Experience /~/r~_~2> /,~/~2-
List most recent experience first (or elaborate on a resume if you prefer)
,~loyer ._ :_ ,, ~ ~ Yo~ Tide .. From (~) To
Brief job description ~, ~
~1~
I~]
~ ~Employ~ Yo~ Title From (~) To
Bfiefjobdescription ~¢*~/~ff, ~VSiC ~¢
E~loyer Yom Title From (~ / To
Briefjo~ des~pfion ~. )~ ~ ~S5~c n~oF ' "~L ~P~oF~ ~L~-~ /~5~-~
~ac, ~F: ~¢5ff~5 ~zc~¢~ /96)-6~/~ts6~/// 37. ~J/i, ICsX-
Education ~:. . ~./y a~ ~n_ /957-~
List most recent experience f~st
.o
~sfimtio~ocafion Credim eme~ajor ~ea of study Graduated?
Instimfio~ocafion Cre~B eme~ajor ~ea of ~dy Graduated?
' ~ No
~hmfio~ocafion Credi~ eame~ajor ~ea of s~) ~' ~aduated?
Oharitable, 8oeial, and Oivie getivitie~ and ~emb~r~hip~
Lis~ major acjvi~s you have p~cipated m d~g ~e last five yem
Org~ation ~d loca~on ~oup's p~ose/objecfive ~ of members
Bmf desc~p~on of yo~p~cipafion
Organ~afion and location ~oup's p~ose/objecfive ~ of members
Brief description of yo~ p~cipafion
Applica~'Signatur~ - ~ -
Submit completed forms to: Office of the City Clerk, City of Port Angeles, 321 E. 5th Street, P. O. Box 1150,
Port Angeles, Washington, 98362 1/99
QUESTIONS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CANDIDATES
1. What are some of the strengths and weaknesses about the land use planning that has been
done in Port Angeles and what new planning policie, s would help in the future?
2. What is the relationship between the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan?
3. You are in favor of a project that violates the City's Zoning Ordinance, what actions can you
take?
4. Vacant buildable land is in short supply for what type of zones in Port Angeles and why do
you think this is so?
lO
pORTANGELES
GITY
OTY C
Application for Appointment to a Board, Commission, or Committee
Board, Commission, or Committee to which you are seeking appointment
Board or Commission Full Name
Board or Commission Full Name
Board or Commission Full Name
Applicant Name and General Information
~i/..A~-~-'r' / tmat4zt R'~T' MI Birthdate (M/D/Y) --
Home street address
City t State Zip Code
Home phone number Work phone number
Certification and Location Information c~rc~e o.e
Are you currently a City employee? Ye~) Are you a citizen of the United StatesT~o
Are you a City resident? e~o Do you own/manage a business in the City?
Yej~
Do you hold any professional licenses, registrations or certificates in any field (list below)~o
Are you aware of any conflict of interest which might arise by your service on a City Board or Commission? If so,
please explain: ,ex/~e~"~Yd ~
In compliance with the American Disabilities Act, if you will need special accommodations because of a physical
limitation, please contact the City Clerk, 417-4634, so appropriate arrangements can be made.
(OVER)
11
Work Experience
List most recent experience first (or elaborate on a resume if you prefer)
Employer Your Title From (M/Y) To (M/Y)
Brief job description
2.
Employer Your Title From (M/Y) To (M/Y)
Brief job description
3.
Employer Your Title From (M/Y) To {M/Y)
Brief job description
Education
List most recent experience tn-st
1. ~J~ ~/~"7'yT"~-~D !'~:~=~-_~-~'~ Yes No
Institution/Location Credits earned/Major area of study Graduated?
Yes No
2.
Institution/Location Credits earned/Major area of study Graduated?
Yes No
3.
Institution/Location Credits earned/Major area of study Graduated?
Charitable, Social, and Civic Activities and Memberships ~_- ~>~4~___
List major activities you have participated in during the last five years
Organization and location Group's pmpose/~bjective # of members
Brief description of your participation
Organization and location Group's purpose/objective # of members
Brief description of your particip~j~ ~
~pplicant S~nature/ - - ~ Date --
Submit completed forms to: Office of the City Clerk, City of Port Angeles, 321 E. 5th Street, P. O. Box 1150,
Port Angeles, Washington, 98362 1/99
12
FREDRICK DONALD NORTON
Born Los Angeles, California
September 3, 1931
Retired building official
We purchased our Port Angeles home and property in 1986. Mrs. Norton's
parents occupied the home from then until 1996 when I retired. Her parents
still live in Port Angeles.
VOLUNTEER AND ADVISORY BOARD EXPERIENCE
City of Port Angeles, Building Appeals Board; Appointed 1996 to four year
term.
Vestry, St. Andrew's Episcopal Church, Port Angeles: Elected 1998 to three
year term.
Advisory Committee to the California Energy Commission; Sacramento,
California, 1996-1991
WORK HISTORY
Worked with and sometimes for planners for over thirty-five years as
building official. Was responsible In most cases for enforcement of zoning
regulations. Presented staff reports to Planning Commissions, City
Councils, and County Boards of Supervisors. Positions marked with an
asterisk (*) were with combined building and planning departments.
November 1995 to Contract Building Inspector *
June 1996 KA & Associates, Santa Ana, California
Assigned to City of Costa Mesa, California
January 1995 to Contract Building Inspector *
November 1995 Employme~t S?sterns. Inc.. San Dieqe
December 1990 to Director of Building and Safety
December 1994 County of San Bernardino, California
August 1989 to Building and Safety Official
December 1990 City of Lancaster, California
February 1984 to Chief Building Official *
August 1989 County of San Luis Obispo
13
-2-
October 1982 to Code Administrative Manager *
February 1984 City of Yakima, Washington
April 1977 to Chief, Building Inspection Division
October 1982 City of Clovis, California
December 1973 to Electrical Safety Consultant *
April 1977 City of Fresno, California
August 1966 to District Representative, Division of Codes
December 1973 and Standards, Department of Housing and
Community Development, State of California
November 1961 to Chief Building Inspector
August 1966 County of Lake, California
May 1961 to Building Inspector
November 1961 County of Kings, California
Prior to becoming an Inspector I was a construction laborer, apprentice and
journeyman carpenter.
TEACHING:
Taught courses In blueprint reading and electrical code for five semesters
at Cuesta Community College, San Luis Obispo, California. 1986-1989.
LICENSES AND CERTIFICATES
(CABO = Council of American Building Officials; ICBO = International
Conference of Building Officials)
CABO Certified Building Official # 319
ICBO Certified Plans Examiner # 7898
ICBO Certified Building Inspector # 6666
ICBO Certified Combination Dwelling Inspector # 7204
California State Contractors License (B)# 404135
California Community College Teaching Certificate # 15919
14
-3-
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION ACTIVITY
Member in Following Chapters
San Joaquin Valley (Past President), ICBO
Redwood Empire Chapter, ICBO
Inland Empire Chapter of Washington, ICBO
California Building Officials (CALBO)
County Building Officials Association of California
High Desert Chapter, ICBO
Citrus Belt Chapter, ICBO
High Country Chapter, ICBO
Washington Association of Building Officials (WABO)
!CBO ACTIVITY
Member of Indoor Air Quality Code Development Committee
Member of Resolutions Committee, 1992 ABM
Chair, Resolutions Committee, 1993 ABM
OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
International Association of Electrical Inspectors (Past President of
Southwestem Section, Past Chairman and Secretary/Treasurer of Central
California Chapter)
International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials
National Fire Protection Association
International Fire Code Institute
EDUCATION
AA Liberal Arts, Fresno City College 1971
Attended the following:
California State University, Fresno
Santa Ana College
Orange Coast College
Fullerton JC
Santa Rosa JC
Modesto Community College
Fresno City College
Cuesta Community College
15
-4-
I would like to bring to the Planning Commission common sense and
reasonableness in land use/zoning applications. Commission decisions
should place strong emphasis on the right of the property owner to use
their land as they wish so long as it does not affect the health and safety of
others.
16
QUESTIONS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CANDIDATES
1. What are some of the strengths and weaknesses about the land use planning that has been
done in Port Angeles and what new planning policies would help in the future?
2. What is the relationship between the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan?
3. You are in favor of a project that violates the City's Zoning Ordinance, what actions can you
take?
4. Vacant buildable land is in short supply for what type of zones in Port Angeles and why do
you think this is so?
pmtAN . s. , ,
Cl'l~ OF PORT ANGELES
CITY CLERK
Application for Appointment to a Board, Commission, or Committee
Board, Commission, or Committee to which you are seeking appointment
Board ~r Commission Full Name '~
Board or Commission Full Name
Board or Commission Full Name
Applicant Name and General Information
First Last MI Birthdate (M/DH)
Home street address
City State Zip Code
C,l'.E"7- (ooD,./ -(:, 5" ?
Home phone number Work phone number
Certification and Location Information civic
Are you currently a City employee? Yes~__ Are you a citizen of the United States? (~No
Are you a City resident? ~No Do you own/manage a business in the City?~")No
Do you hold any professional licenses, registrations or certificates in any field (list below)? e~)No
Are yo~ aware of any conflict of intere,st which might ~zise by. your service on a City Board or Coramission? I£ so,
In compliance with the Ameri¢~ Di.~biliti¢~ Act, i£ yo~ will ~eed special ~¢¢o~odations ~e¢~¢ o£ ~ phy,~ical
liraitatio~, please contact t. ke City Clerk, 417-48~4, so ~l~ropri~te arr~¢mcms can be
(OV£~)
18
Work Experience
List most recent experience first (or elaborate on a resume if you prefer)
Employer .... your Title From (M/Y) To (M/Y)
Brief job description
Employer Your Title From (M/Y) To (M/Y)
Brief job description
Employer Your Title From (M/Y) To (M/Y)
Brief job description
Education
List most recent experience fin'st
Institution/Location Credits earned/Major area of study Graduated?
Institution/Location Credits earned/Major area of study Graduated?
Institution/Location Credits em'ned/Major area of study Graduated?
Oharitable, Social, and Civic ~etivities and Memberships
List major activities you have participated in during the last five years
Orgamzatmn and location Group's purpose/objective # of members
Brief description of your participation
Organization and location Group's purpose/objective # of members
cef description of your pa~icipation
ant Signature Date
Submit completed forms to: Office of thc City Clerk, City of Port Angeles, 321 E. 5th Street, P. O. Box 1150,
Port Angeles, Washington, 98362 1/99
19
QUESTIONS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CANDIDATES
1. What are some of the strengths and weaknesses about the land use planning that has been
done in Port Angeles and what new planning policies would help in the future?
2. What is the relationship between the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan.'?
3. You are in favor of a project that violates the City's Zoning Ordinance, what actions can you
take?
4. Vacant buildable land is in short supply for what type of zones in Port Angeles and why do
you think this is so?
20
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jack Pittis, Director of Public Works & Utilities
SUBJECT-' International Building Safety Week
Issue: Recognize "International Building Safety Week"
Recommendation: The Mayor proclaim April 4 - 10, 1999 "International Building Safety
Week" in the City of Port Angeles.
Summary: The attached proclamation declares the week of April 4- 10, 1999, as "International
Building Safety Week" and recognizes the importance of safe buildings and the professional code
officials who make sure buildings are safe in their community. The Building Division's number one
concern is public safety. Staff enforce, s building codes that result in the safe construction of all types
ofbuil~dings. The International Conference of Building Officials (I.C.B.O.) sponsors "International
Building Safety Week" and this year's theme is "A Safer World Is On The Horizon."
Background/Analysis: The building, plumbing, mechanical and fire codes have been written and
published by the International Conference of Building Officials since the early 1900's. These model
codes were authored by the code enforcement officials of various communities with key assistance
from all segments of the building industry. Model codes have now become the central regulatory
basis for the administration of building regulatory programs in cities, counties and states throughout
the United States. The system is so well developed that the true complexity of the process is obscure
to many. It is for the purpose of creating awareness of this important public service that I.C.B.O.
created "International Building Safety Week."
The importance of building codes, their regulation and enforcement, is often overlooked until a
catastrophic fire or other construction - related tragedy occurs. Over the past few years the Building
Division has continued 'to see an increase in construction activity and in the year 1998, 739 permits
were issued with a total construction evaluation of over $18 million dollars. By inspecting buildings
during and after construction, the City of Port Angeles Building Division helps to ensure that
buildings in the community are safe, sound and accessible places to work, play and live.
21
PROCLAMATION
INTERNATIONAL BUILDING SAFETY WEEK
APRIl. 4 - 10
WHEREAS the safety of the btlildings we occupy daily is essential to the health, safety and
wel£are oflhe citizens of the world; and
WHEREAS among the workd's most fundamental taws are those which provide safety standards
for the construction of buildings in which people live, work and play; and
WHEREAS for construction and building codes to be effective and enforced, understanding and
cooperation musI exist between code officials and the people they serve; and
W~IEREAS through the efforts of co~,e officials worldwide, and their cooperative relat/onship
with the construction industry, the administration of these health and life-safc"ty
standards is assured; and
W ltEREAS units of government across the world -- along with such prestigious organizations
as Building Officials &cod& Administrators (BOCA) International, Inc.,
International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO); Southern Building Code
COngress International (SBCCI), Inc., the Council of American Building Officials
(CABO), the National Conference of States on Building Codes and Standards
(NCSBCS), and the World Organization of Building Officials (WOBO) -- are
joining to prcmaote the use of building and construction codes today, for a lifetime
of building safety, through the observation of International Building Safety Week;
and
WHEREAS the theme of Lntemational Building Safety Week 1999 has been established as "For
A Safer Tomorrow."
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PORT ~NGELES in consideration of the above findings:
Thc week of April 4-- 10, 199~, shall be known as INTERNATIONAL BUILDING SAFETY WEEK.
I urge} all citizens to participate~in International Building Safety Week activities to help promote
building safety, to create awareness as to the importance of construction and building codes, and to
spotlight the role of the dedicated code official in administering those codes.
Gary Braun, Mayor Date
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CiTY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jack Pittis, Director of Public Works & Utilities
SUBJECT: Inventory of deteriorating and unusable buildings
Issue: Workshop to review the inventory of deteriorating and unusable buildings within the City of
Port Angeles.
Recommendation: Workshop is to discuss potential approaches for enforcement of City codes
where buildint~s have fallen into disrepair.
Summary: Deteriorating and potentially unusable buildings exist throughout the City. An inventory
completed in December of 1998 found over 100 structures that need attention. Some structures are
repairable while a majority should be torn down. All of the structures have the potential to be
classified as dangerous buildings under the 1997 Uniform Building Code for the Abatement of
Dangerous Buildings. Prior to any enforcement action, additional inspections would need to be
conducted to verify and document conditions. The use of the Uniform Building Code Abatement of
Dangerous Buildings provisions would provide the City with the ability to require the owner to repair
or remove the structure or to cause such repair or removal at the owners expense, if they failed to
comply.
Baclqlround /Analysis: The attached report documents the results of the inventory. Structures are
identified by address and classified into four categories.
1) structures that in the opinion of the Building Official are not repairable
2) structures that are repairable
3) structures that could be judged to be attractive nuisances
4) structures that are non-compliant with current codes and regulations of the City.
The introduction to the report provides further information and staff'will make a presentation on this
topic as a workshop item at the Council meeting. The purpose of the workshop is to inform the City
Council of the results of the building inventory and to discuss the process available to the City to
remedy the conditions.
G:~EXCHANGE\CNCLPKT~PUBWKS~d3AT-CC.499
INVENTORY OF DETERIORATING
AND UNUSABLE BUILDINGS
March 1999
Port Angeles Public Works Department
Buildings Division
Table of Contents
Introduction
Page
Uniform Building Code Enforcement Authorization .............................................. 1 - 4
Section 1
Non-Rehabitable Structures ................................................................................... 1- 27
Section 2
Kehabitable Structures ........................................................................................... 28-36
Section 3
Kehabitable Attractive Nuisances ............................................................................ 37-38
Section 4
Structures Constructed Without A Building Permit ................................................ 39-42
Survey Keport ...................................................................................................... 1- 7
Introduction
This report contains a listing (including photos) of structures that may qualify as dangerous buildings
as defined by the 1997 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. If upon further
review, any or all of these structures are found to be dangerous buildings under the code then they
would be declared public nuisances subject to abatement by repair, rehabilitation, demolition or
removal. While the City has pursued public nuisances associated with property (tall grass, junk, junk
vehicles, etc.) it has not actively pursued building abatement in the past. It has been suggested that
improving the appearance of the City would help in promoting economic development and more
rigorous enforcement of the abatement code and public nuisances is an option to help beautify our
city. However, as with any departure from previous practice or more active enforcement of code
requirements, controversy can occur within the community. Because of this, staff has prepared this
report for review and discussion so that the Council is informed of the potential magnitude of the
situation (well over 100 structures).
The report is divided into five sections. Immediately following this introduction are copies of
chapters 2,3 and 4 of the 1997 Abatement of Dangerous Buildings Code and at the end of the report
is a list sorted by address. The remaining numbered four sections break out the structures into
categories based on the potential severity of what was found in the initial survey.
Section I Structures that in the judgement of the Building Official are not repairable and
would need to be demolished or removed.
Section 2 Structures that in the judgement of the Building Official are repairable.
Section 3 Structures that are a potential attractive nuisance.
Section 4 Structures that are currently noncompliant with current codes and regulations
(no permits and/or in setback) where enforcement action might not be
warranted.
During the City Council workshop on this matter to be held April 6th, the various methods of
addressing these issues will be discussed. For example, a simple informational letter to property
owners could result in significant cleanup without further city involvement. However, abatement is
a very formal and prescribed legal process that once started imposes certain obligations on both the
property owner and the City.
1997 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS r 201
2O5.2
Chapter 2
ENFORCEMENT
SECTION 201 t GENERAL SECTION 203 B VIOLATIONS
201.1 Administration. The building official is hereby autho- It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect,
rized to enforce the provisions of this code. construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, conve~
The building official shall have the power to render interpreta- or demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building or struc-
tions of this code and to adopt and enforce rules and supplemental ture or cause or permit the same to be done in violation of this
regulations in order to clarify the application of its provisions, code.
Such interpretations, rules and regulations shall be in conformity
with the intent and propose of this code. SECTION 204 -- INSPECTION OF WORK
201.2 Inspections. The health officer, the fire marshal and the
building official are hereby authorized to make such inspections All buildings or structures within the scope of this code and all
and take such actions as may be required to enforce the provisions construction or work for which a permit is required shall be sub-
of this code. ject to inspection by the building official in accordance with and in
the manner provided by this code and Sections 108 and 1701 of the
2013 Right of Entry. When it is necessary to make an inspec- Building Code.
tion to enforce the provisions of this code, or when the building
official or the building official's authorized representative has rea-
sonable cause to believe that there exists in a building or upon a SECTION 205 t BOARD OF APPEALS
premises a condition which is contrary to or in violation of this
code which makes the building or premises unsafe, dangerous or 205.1 General. In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, de-
hazardous, the building official may enter the building or premises cisions or determinations made by the building official relative to
at reasonable times to inspect or to perform the duties imposed by the application and interpretations of this code, there shall be and
this code, provided that if such building or premises be occupied is hereby created a board of appeals consisting of members who
that credentials be presented to the occupant and entry requested, are qualified by experience and training to pass upon matters per-
If such building or premises be unoccupied, the building official taining to building construction and who are not employees of the
shall first make a reasonable effort to locate the owner or other per- jurisdiction. The building official shall be an ex officio member
sons having charge or control of the building or premises and re- and shall act as secretary to said board but shall have no vote upon
quest entry. If entry is refused, the building official shall have any matter before the board. The board of appeals shall be ap-
recourse to the remedies provided by law to secure entry, pointed by the governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure.
"Authorized representative" shall include the officers named in The board shall adopt rules of procedure for conducting its busi-
Section 201.2 and their authorized inspection personnel, ness and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the
appellant, with a duplicate copy to the building official. Appeals to
the board shall be processed in accordance with the provisions
SECTION 202 -- ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS contained in Section 501 of this code. Copies of all rules or regula-
BUILDINGS tions adopted by the board shall be delivered to the building offi-
cial, who shall make them freely accessible to the public.
All buildings or portions thereof whi~h? determined after i~-
spectionl~Ythebm'lding°~tt~ ~g~a~:~[n this 205.2 Limitations of Authority. The board of appeals shall
code are hereby declared' !0:1~ l~biiE'ifO~S and shall be have no authority relative to interpretation of the administrative
abated ~ rehabilRafion, dmaaolition.qr rertmval i~,~ provisions of this code nor shall the board be empowered to waive
ance wifil tlt~~ specified ia ~ 401 of this code. requirements of this code.
1997 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS 301
302*
Chapter 3
DEFINITIONS
SECTION 301- GENERAL 7. Whenever any portion thereof has wracked, warped,
buckled or settled to such an extent that walls or other structural
For the purpose of this code, certain terms, phrases, words and portions have materially less resistance to winds or earthquakes
their derivatives shall be construed as specified in either this chap- than is required in the case of similar new construction.
ter or as specified in the Building Code or the Housing Code.
Where terms are not defined, they shall have their ordinary ac- 8. Whenever the building or structure, or any portion thereof,
cepted meanings within the context with which they arc used. because of (i) dilapidation, deterioration or decay; (ii) faulty con-
Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Lan- struction; (iii) the removal, movement or instability of any portion
guage, Unabridged, copyright 1986, shall be construed as provid- of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting such build-
lng ordinary accepted meanings. Words used in the singular lng; (iv) the deterioration, decay or inadequacy of its foundation;
include thc plural and thc plural the singular. Words used in thc or (v) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse.
masculine gender include thc feminine and the feminine the mas- 9. Whenever, for any reason, the building or structure, or any
culine, portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose for which it is
BUILDING CODE is the Uniform Building Code promul- being used.
gated by thc International Conference of Building Officials, as 10. Whenever the exterior walls or other vertical structural
adopted by this jurisdiction, members list, lean or buckle to such an extent that a plumb line
DANGEROUS BUILDING is any building or structure passing through the center of gravity does not fall inside the
deemed to be dangerous under thc provisions of Section 302 of middle one third of thc base.
this code. 11. Whenever the building or structure, exclusive of thc roux-
HOUSING CODE is thc Uniform Housing Code promulgated dation, shows 33 percent or more damage or deterioration of its
by the International Conference of Building Officials, as adopted supporting member or members, or 50 percent damage or deterio-
ration of its nonsupporting members, enclosing or outside walls or
by this jurisdiction, coverings.
12. Whenever the building or structure has been so damaged by
SECTION 302 -- DANGEROUS BUILDING fire, wind, earthquake or flood, or has become so dilapidated or
For the purpose of this code, any building or structure which has deteriorated as to become (i) an attractive nuisance to children; (ii)
any or all of the conditions or defects hereinafter described shall a harbor for vagrants, criminals or immoral persons; or as to (iii)
be deemed to be a dangerous building, provided that such condi- enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing un-
tions or defects exist to the extent that the life, health, property or lawful or immoral acts.
safety of the public or its occupants are endangered. ~ !3~ ~whenevcr any building or structure has been constructed,
1. Whenever any door, aisle, passageway, stairway or other exists or is maintained in violation of any specific requirement or
means of exit is not of sufficient width or size or is not so arranged prohibition applicable to such building or structure provided by
as to provide safe and adequate means of exit in case of fire or pan- the building regulations of this jurisdiction, as specified in the
Building Code or Housing Code, or of any law or ordinance of this
lc. state or jurisdiction relating to the condition, location or smscture
2. Whenever the walking surface of any aisle, passageway, of buildings.
stairway or other means of exit is so warped, worn, loose, torn or
otherwise unsafe as to not provide safe and adequate means of exit 14. Whenever any building or structure which, whether or not
erected in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances, has
in case of fire or panic, in any nonsupporting part, member or portion less than 50 percent,
3. Whenever the stress in any' materials, member or portion or in any supporting part, member or portion less than 66 percent
thereof, due to all dead and live loads, is more than one and one of the (i) strength, (ii) fire-resisting qualities or characteristics, or
half times the working stress or stresses allowed in the Building (iii) weather-resisting qualities or characteristics required by law
Code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location, in the case of a newly constructed building of like area, height and
4. Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, occupancy in the same location.
earthquake, wind, flood or by any other cause, to such an extent 15. Whenever a building or structure, used or intended to be
that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance,
than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement,
requirements of the Building Code for new buildings of similar inadequate light, air or sanitation facilities, or otherwise, is deter-
structure, purpose or location, mined by the health officer to be unsanitary, unfit for human habi-
tation or in such a condition that is likely to cause sickness or
5. Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is disease.
likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse
and thereby injure persons or damage property. 16. Whenever any building or structure, because of obsoles-
6. Whenever any portion of a building, or any member, appur- cence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate
tcnance or ornamentation on the exterior thereof is not of suffi- exits, lack of sufficient fire-resistive construction, faulty electric
cient strength or stability, or is not so anchored, attached or wiring, gas connections or heating apparatus, or other cause, is de-
fastened in place so as to be capable of resisting a wind pressure of termined by the fire marshal to be a fire hazard.
one half of that specified in the Building Code for new buildings of 17. Whenever any building or structure is in such a condition as
similar structure, purpose or location without exceeding the work- to constitute a public nuisance known to the common law or in eq-
ing stresses permitted in the Building Code for such buildings, uity jurisprudence.
1997 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUll. DINGS 401
Chapter 4
NOTICES AND ORDERS OF BUILDING OFFICIAL
SECTION 401 --GENERAL building official or disclosed from official public records: thc
holder of any mortgage or deed of trust or other lien or cncum-
401.1 Commencement of Proceedings. When the building of- brance of record; the owner or holder of any lease of record; and
ficial has inspected or caused to bc inspected any building and has thc holder of any other estate or legal interest of record in or to the
found and determined that such building is a dangerous building, building or thc land on which it is located. Thc failure of thc build-
thc building official shall commence proceedings to cause the re- lng official to serve any person required herein to be served shall
pair, vacation or demolition of the building, not invalidate any proceedings hereunder as to any other person
401.2 Notice and Order. The building official shall issue a no- duly served or relieve any such person from any duty or obligation
rice and order directed to thc record owner of the building. Thc no- imposed by the provisions of this section.
tice and order shall contain: 401.4 Method of Service. Service of thc notice and order shall
1. The street address and a legal description sufficient for idcn- be made upon all persons entitled thereto either personally or by
tification of the premises upon which the building is located, mailing a copy of such notice and order by certified mail, postage
prepaid, return receipt requested, to each such person at their ad-
2. A statement that thc building official has found the building dress as it appears on thc last equalized assessment roll of thc
to be dangerous with a brief and concise description of the condi- county or as known to the building official. If no address of any
tions found to render the building dangerous under the provisions such person so appears or is known to the building official, then a
of Section 302 of this code. copy of the notice and order shall be so mailed, addressed to such
3. A statement of the action required to be taken as determined person, at the address of the building involved in the proceedings.
by the building official. The failure of any such person to receive such notice shall not af-
fect the validity of any proceedings taken under this section. Serv-
3.1 If the building official has determined that the building ice by certified mail in the manner herein provided shall be
or structure must be repaired, the order shall require that effective on the date of mailing.
all required permits be secured therefor and the work
physically commenced within such time (not to exceed 401.5 Proof of Service. Proof of service of the notice and order
60 days from the date of the order) and completed with- shall be certified to at the time of service by a written declaration
in such time as the building official shall determine is under penalty of perjury executed by the persons effecting serv-
reasonable under all of the circumstances, ice, declaring the time, date and manner in which service was
made. The declaration, together with any receipt card returned in
3.2 If the building official has determined that the building acknowledgment of receipt by certified mail shall be afl'ned to
or structure must be vacated, the order shall require that the copy of the notice and order retained by the building official.
the building or structure shall be vacated within a time
certain from the date of the order as determined by the
building official to be reasonable. SECTION 402 m RECORDATION OF NOTICE AND
ORDER
3.3 If the building official has determined that the building
or structure must be demolished, the order shall require If compliance is not had with the order within the time specified
that the building be vacated within such time as the therein, and no appeal has been properly and timely filed, the
building official shall determine is reasonable (not to building official shall file in the office of the county recorder a cer-
exceed 60 days from the date of the order); that all re- tificate describing the property and certifying (i) that the building
quired permits be secured therefor within 60 days from is a dangerous building and (ii) that the owner has been so noti-
the date of the order; and that the demolition be eom- fled. Whenever the corrections ordered shall thereafter have been
pleted within such time as the building official shall de- completed or the building demolished so that it no longer exists as
termine is reasonable, a dangerous building on the property described in the certificate,
the building official shah file a new certificate with the county re-
4. Statements advising that if any required repair or demolition corder certifying that the building has been demolished or all re-
work (without vacation also being required) is not commenced quired corrections have been made so that the building is no
within the time specified, the building official (i) will order the longer dangerous, whichever is appropriate.
building vacated and posted to prevent further occupancy until
thc work is completed, and (ii) may proceed to cause the work to SECTION 403 m REPAIR, VACATION AND
be done and charge the costs thereof against the property or its DEMOLITION
owner.
The following standards shall be followed by the building official
5. Statements advising (i) that any person having any record (and by the board of appeals if an appeal is taken) in ordering the
title or legal interest in the building may appeal from the notice repair, vacation or demolition of any dangerous building or struc-
and order or any action of the building official to the board of ap- tuft:
peals, provided the appeal is made in writing as provided in this
code and filed with the building official within 30 days from the ~ l,~i~il~ing declared a ~gero~b~g lnlder this code
date of service of such notice and order; and (ii) that failure to ap- ~ be made tO' ~ply wilh one of the following:
peal will constitute a waiver of all right to an administrative hear- 1.! The building shall be repaired in accordance with the
lng and determination of the matter, current building code or other current code applicable
401.3 Service of Notice and Order. The notice and order, and to the type of substandard conditions requiring repair;
any amended or supplemental notice and order, shall be served or
upon the record owner and posted on the property; and one copy 1.2 The building shall be demolished at the option of the
thereof shall be served on each of the following if known to the building owner; or
403 1997 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS
4O4.2
~ If the building does not constitute an immediate danger 404.2 Compliance. Whenever such notice is posted, the build-
to the life, limb, property or safety of the public it may ing official shall include a notification thereof in the notice and
be vacated, secured and maintained against entry, order issued under Section 401.2, reciting the emergency and
2. If the building or structure is in such condition as.to make it specifying th6 conditions which necessitate the posting. No per-
immediately dangerous to the life, limb, property or safety of the son shall remain in or enter any building which has been so
public or its occupants, it shall be ordered to be vacated, posted, except that entry may be made to repair, demolish or re-
move such building under permit. No person shall remove or de-
face any such notice after it is posted until the required repairs,
SECTION 404 -- NOTICE TO VACATE demolition or removal have been completed and a certificate of
occupancy issued pursuant to the provisions of the Building
404.1 Posting. Every notice to vacate shall, in addition to being Code.
served as provided in Section 401.3, be posted at or upon each exit
of the building and shall be in substantially the following form:
DO NOT ENTER
UNSAFE TO OCCUPY
It is a misdemeanor to occupy this building, or to remove
or deface this notice.
Building Official
....... of .......
8
Section 1
Structures that in the judgement of the Building Official are not
repairable and would need to be demolished or removed.
Abatement Priorities
03-Mar-99
Photo# 6 File: 12 11 06 Date: 12/11/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 7 File: 12 11 07 Date: 12/11,/98 Priority: 1
t024 W 10th 1024 W 10th
Desc: -16X20 DETACHED GAIL&GE (ROOF ROT, Desc: -16X20 DETACHED GARAGE (ROOF ROT~
LEANING) LEANING)
Photo# 4 File: 12 11 04 Date: 12,"11/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 3 File: 12 ll 03 Date: 12/11/98 Priority: 1
935 W 10th 935 W 10th
Desc: -16X20 DETACHED GARAGE(ROOF SAG, Desc: -8X8 SHED (ROT, LEANING)
LEANING,WALL ROT)
Photo# l File:12 11 01 Date: 12,/11/98 Priority:l Photo#8 File:12 10 08 Date: 12/10/98 Priority:l
-133 W lOth 2016 W 10th
Desc: DEMOLISHED REMAINS OF -16X20 Desc: -16X20 SHED(FLOOR & ROOF ROT)
DETACHED GARAGE.
Photo# 5 File: 12 11 05 Date: 12/11/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 8 File: 12 11 08 Date: 12/11/98 Priority: t
935 W 10th 1237 W llth
Desc: --16X20 DETACHED GARAGE(ROOF SAG. Desc: -16X20 DETACHED GARAGE (PARTIAL ROOF
LEANING. WALL ROT) &WALI. COLLAPSING)
Photo# 4 File: 1 12 04 Date: 1/12/99 Priority: I Photo# 4 File: 12 10 04 Date: 12/10/98 Priority: 1
317 W llth 932 W 12th
Desc: TWO SHEDS (ROOF ROT & SAG, Desc: -8X14 SHED (ROOF SAG, GENERAL
SETTLEMENT) DETERIORATION)
Photo# 5 File: 12 8 05 Date: 12/8/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 2 File: 12 10 02 Date: 12/10/98 Priority: 1
530 W 12th 1028 W 12th
Desc: -16X20 DETACHED GAIL~GE(WALL ROT; Desc: -16X20 DETACHED GARAGE (LEANING,
WALL SAG) WALL & ROOF ROT)
Photo# 2 File: 12 8 02 Date: 12/8/98 Priority: 1 Photo # 3 File: 12 10 03 Date: 12/10/98 Priority: 1
524 W 12th 1028 W 12th
Desc: -16X24 GARAGE (ROOF SAG, ROOF ROT& Desc: -16X20 DETACHED GA1L~GE (LEANING?
GENERAL DETERIORATION) WAIA. & ROOF ROT)
Photo# 4 File: 12 8 04 Date: 12/8/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 1 File: 12 8 01 Date: 12,/8/98 Priority: 1
524 W 12th 524 W 12th
Desc: -16X24 DETACHED GARAGE(ROOF SAG, Desc: -16 X 24 DETACHED GARAGE ( ROOF SAG &
GENERAL DETERIORATION) GENERAL DETERIORATION
Photo# 3 File: 12 8 03 Date: 12/8/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 7 File: 12 8 07 Date: 12/8/98 Priority: 1
524 W 12th 530 W 12th
Desc: -16X24 DETACHED GARAGE(ROOF SAG, Desc: -16X20 DETACHED GARAGE( WALL ROT,
GENERAL DETERIORATION) WALL SAG)
Photo#1 File: 12 8 14 Date: 12/8/98 Priority: 1 Photo#1 File: 12 10 0t Date: 12/10/98 Priority:l
833 W 12th 1028 W 12th
Desc: - l OX 16 ATTACHED SHED(GENERAL Desc: - 16X20 DETACHED GARAGE (LEANING,
DETERIO[L&TiON) WALL & ROOF ROT)
Photo# 2 File: 1 15 02 Date: 1/15/99 Priority: I Photo# 8 File: 12 8 08 Date: 12/8/98 Priority: I
516 E 12TH 501 W 13th
Desc: -16X16 GARAGE (ROOF BOW, LEANING, Desc: -8X18 SHED(GENERAL DETERIORATION)
SETTLEMENT)
Photo# 9 File: 12 8 09 Date: 12/8/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 4 File: 12 3 04 Date: 12/3/98 Priority: 1
501 W 13th 107 E 13th
Desc: -8X18 SHED(GENERAL DETERIORATION) Desc: 16x20 GARAGE (SEVERE WALL SPLIT & ROT)
4
Photo# 3 File: 12 ~ 03 Date: 1~o 8 Priority: 1 Photo # 1 File: 12 8 10 Date: 12/8/98 Priority: I
107 E 13th 811 W 14th
Desc: 16x20 GARAGE (SEVERE WALL SPLIT & ROT) Desc: -.~4X~.4 DETACHED GARAGE(OLD,GENERAL
DETERIORATION & ROT)
Photo# I File: 12 8 11 Date: 12/8./98 Priority: 1 Photo#2 File:12 3 02 Date: 12/3/98 Priority: 1
811 W 14th 117 E 14th
Desc: -24X24 DETACHED GARAGE(OLD, GENERAL Desc: 12x20 GAGAGE ( ROOF SAG)
DETERIORATION & ROT) ~. ! .
Photo# I File: 12 3 01 Date: 12/3/98 Priority:l Photo# 5 File: 12 10 05 Date: 12/10/98 Priority:l
126 W 14th -102 W 15th
Desc: 6x20 SHED (EXTREME DETERIORATION) Desc: -8X16 CARPORT (LEANING, NON-CODE
CONSTRUCTION)
Photo# 3 File: 12 7 03 Date: 12/7/98 Priority: I Photo# 6 File: 12 10 06 Date: 12/10/98 Priority: 1
W 15th S/ECORNER 15TH & 1011 W 16th
EVANS Desc: -6X20 LEAN-TO (LEANING, NON-CODE
Desc: --I 2 X 12 METAL SHED(ROOF COLLAPSED) CONSTRUCTION. INTO SIDEYARD
AND --10 X20 SHED(GENERAL SETBACKS)
DETERIORATION)
Photo# 2 File: 12 7 02 Date: 12/7/98 Priority: 1 Photo# I File: 12 7 01 Date: 12/7/98 Priority: 1
2132 W 16th 20t9 W 18th
Desc: -12 X 20 SHED ( GENERAL DETERIORATION, Desc: -20' X 20' GARAGE (ROOF ROT & GENERAL
ROOF SAG) DETERIORATION, OLD.)
Photo# 5 File: 1 15 05 Date: 1/15/99 Priority: 1 Photo# I File: I 13 01 Date: 1/13/99 Priority: 1
~928 E 2ND 301 E 2nd
Desc: -8X 10 SHED OVERGROWN, ROT) Desc: -8X 12 SHED ( ON TRAILER)
6
Photo# 1 File: 1 15 17 Date: t/15/99 Priority: t Photo# 1 File: 1 15 18 Date: 1/15/99 Priority: 1
316 W 2ND 316 W 2ND
Desc: - 16X 16 GA[L~G E/CARPORT(ROOF BOW, Desc: -t 6X 16 GARAGE/CARPORT (ROOF BOW.
LEANING) LEANING)
Photo# t File: 1 13 16 Date: 1/13/99 Priority: 1 Photo# 2 File: I 13 02 Date: t/13/99 Priority: 1
-133 E 3rd 607 E 3rd
Desc: -16X16 GARAGE (EXTREME ROOF ROT. Desc: -16X24 GARAGE (ROOF ROT, WALL SAG)
LEANING)
Photo# 1 File:l 15 12 Date: 1/15/99 PrioriD': I Photo# I File: I 15 13 Date: 1/15/99 Priority: 1
"3R W 3RD W 3RD& VALLEY "3R W 3RD W 3RD & VALLEY
Desc: APARTMENT BUILDING, 2 SHEDS (ROT & Desc: APARTMENT BUILDING, 2 SHEDS (ROT &
DISREPAIR) DISREPAIR)
Photo# i File: I 15 14 Date: 1/15/99 Priority: 1 Photo# 1 File: t 15 16 Date: 1/15:99 Priority: I
W3 W 3RD W3RD&VALLEY -315 W 3RD
Desc: APARTMENT BUILDING, 2 SHEDS (ROT & Desc: -8Xt0 SHED (OVERGROWN, ROT)
DISREPAIR) ~ ~ -
Photo# 1 File: 1 13 15 Date: 1/13/99 Priority: I Photo# 1 File: 1 12 13 Date: 1/12/99 Priority: 1
1215 E 3rd 212 W 4th
Desc: M2X24 CARPORT SHELL (NON-CODE CONST.) Desc: M6X20 GARAGE (ROOF ROT)
Photo# 1 File: 1 11 18 Date: 1/11/99 Priority: 1 Photo# I File: I 15 It Date: 1/15/99 Priority: 1
1108 E 4th 429 W 4TH
Desc: ~-16X20 GARAGE ( ROOF & WALL ROT) Desc: GARAGE REMAINS
-- ~ '~-t"23 i :'
Photo# I File: 12 16_13 Date: 12/16/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 1 File: 12 16 14 Date: 12/16/98 Priority:
902 W 5th 814 W 5th
Desc: -12X 16 SHED (OVERGRO%'qN, ROT. LEANING.) Dese: -- 16X20 GARAGE(ROOF ROT.LEANING)
Photo# 1 File: 12 16 15 Date: 12/16/98 Priority:l Photo#1 File: 12 16 16 Date: 12/16/98 Priority:t
814 W 5th W 5th NWCORNERW5TH&
Dese: -16X20 GARAGE (ROOF ROT. WALLS CEDAR
LEANING) Desc: 3 SEMI VANS BEING USED AS STORAGE
STRUCTURES; INTO SETBACKS & 5TH ST.
I~W
Photo# 1 File: 12 16 17 Date: 12/16/98 Priority: I Photo# 9 File: 12 23 09 Date: 12/23/98 Priority: 1
W 5th NWCORNER W 5TH & 1606 W 5th
CEDAR
Desc: -20X20 DETACHED GARAGE (ROOF ROT &
Desc: 3 SEMI VANS BEING USED AS STORAGE ROOF SAG, LEANING,SETTLEMENT)
STRUCTURES; INTO SETBACKS & 5TH ST.
Photo# 3 File: t2 29 32 Date: 12/29/98 Priority:l Photo# 2 File: 12 16 23 Date: 12/16/98 Priority:l
312 E 5th 521 W 5th
Desc: OLD SF~GARAGE (WALL ROT & Desc: OLD SINGLE WIDE TRAILER (U~OCCUPIED}
SETTLEMENT. DISREPAIR)
Photo# 2 File: 12 16 24 Date: 12/16/98 Priority: I Photo# 3 File: 12 29 31 Date: 12,/29/98 Priority: 1
52t W 5th 312 E 5th
Desc: OLD. SINGLE WIDE TRAILER;UNOCCUPIED Desc: OLD SFR/GARAGE (WALL ROT &
SETTLEMENT, DISREPAIR)
Photo# 3 File: 12 29 30 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 1 File: 12 11 10 Date: 12/11/98 Priority: 1
312 E 5th 1326 W 5th
Desc: OLD SFR/GARAGE( WALL ROT & Desc: -12X20 SHED (ROOF SAG, WALL ROT,
SETTLEMENT, DISREPAIR) LEANING)
I0
Photo# ~ File: 12 16 '~1 Date: 12/16/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 9 File: 12 1l 09 Date: 12/11/98 Priority: 1
517 W 6th 924 W 6th
Desc: -~ 18X26 GARAGE/CARPORT (WALL Desc: OLD -20X40 RESIDENCE (EYESORE. LACK OF
CRACKS.ROOF DISTORTION)CARPORT AT S~ MAINTENANCE: BUILDING DIV. TO VER1FY
SIDE NOT SHOWN) ABATEMENT.)
Photo# 1 File: 12 I0 13 Date: 12/10/98 Priority:l Photo# 1 File:12 10 14 Date: 12/10/98 Priority: 1
1922 W 6th 1922 W 6th
Desc: - 16X 16 CARPORT(ROOF ROT, ROOF SAG; Desc: -16X 16 CARPORT (ROOF ROT, ROOF
UN DERSIZED ROOF BEAMS) SAG,UNDERSIZED ROOF BEAMS)
Photo# 2 File: 12 16 22 Date: 12/16/98 Priority: I Photo# 3 File: I 12 03 Date: 1/12/99 Priority: 1
517 W 6th 704 E 6th
Desc: --18X26 GARAGE/CARPORT(WALL Desc: -14X18 GARAGE (EXTREME ROT,
CRACKS.ROOE DISTORTION) DISREPAIR...NEAR COLLAPSE)
11
Photo# 1 File:l 12 12 Date: 1/12/99 Priority:t Photo#2 File:l 12 02 Date: 1/12/99 Priority:l
119 W 6th 716 E 7th
Desc: --18X30 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG') Desc: -t0XI0 SHED (ROOF ROI, LEAN1NG (iON
HILLSIDE))
~:~-~. ~ ~.~
Photo# 1 File: 12 16 18 Date: 12/16/98 Priority: I Photo# 8 File: 1 12 08 Date: 1/12/99 Priority: 1
5t9 W 7th 118 W 7th
Desc: -16X20 GARAGE (ROOF ROT, ROOF SAG) Desc: -16X30 GARAGE (OVERGROWN, ROOF ROT)
Photo# 2 File: 12 16 20 Date: 12/16/98 Priority: l Photo# 1 File: 12 l0 12 Date: 12/10/98 Priority: 1
509 W 7th 1922 W 7th
Desc: -16XI 8 GARAGE (EXTREME ROOF & WALL Desc: ~16X20 DETACHED GARAGE(WALL & ROOF
ROT, ROOF SAG) ROT.)
12
Photo# 1 File: 12 10 11 Date: 12/10"98 Prioritv:l Photo# 6 File: 12 23 06 Date: 12/23/98 Priority:l
19.~ W 7th 1431 W 7th
Desc: --16X20 DETACHED GARAGE(WALL & ROOk' Desc: -10X 16 METAL SHED (ROOF COLLAPSED)
ROT)
Photo# 4 File: 12 23 04 Date: 12/23/98 Priority:l Photo# 2 File: 12 23 02 Date: 12/23/98 Priority: 1
1424 W 7th 1710 W 7th
Desc: - 12X 16 SHED ADDITION (INTO SIDE Desc: -1 OX 14 ATTACHED SHED (NON-CODE
SETBACKS; BUILT TO PROP. LINE.) CONST. INTO SIDE SETBACKS)
Photo#1 File:12 10 10 Date: 12/10,/98 Priority:l Photo#1 File: 12 16 19 Date: 12/16/98 Priority:l
1922 W 7th 519 W 7th
Desc: -16X20 DETACHED GARAGE(WALL & ROOF Desc: -16X20 GARAGE (ROOF ROT,ROOF SAG)
ROT)
13
Photo# 1 File: 12 29 14 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 1 File: 12 29 19 Date: 1,,.~9;98 Priority: 1
420 E 7th 317 E 7th
Desc: -10X30 SHED (ROOF ROT & ROOF BUCKLE. Desc: -t4XI4 "GARAGE" ADDN. TO SFR (NON-
WALL ROT. DISREPAIR) CODE CONST_, INTO SIDE SETBACKS?.)
Photo# 1 File: 12 29 16 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: I Photo# 1 File: t2 29_15 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1
610 E 7th 512 E 7th
Desc: -20X20 GARAGE (EXTREME ROOF ROT; Desc: SEMI TRAILER USED AS STORAGE BUILDING
SETTLEMENT)
Photo# 5 File: 12 16 05 Date: 12/16/98 Priority: I Photo# 6 File: 12 29_06 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1
731 W 7th 524 E 8th
Desc: -16X24 GARAGE (ROOF SAG, WALLS Desc: -20X24 OLD RESIDENCE (EXTREME ROOF
LEANING) ROT. DISREPAIR)
14
Photo# 7 File: 12 29 07 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 8 File: 12 29 08 Date: 12'29/98 Priority: 1
602 E 8th 602 E 8th
Desc: UNSECURED COMMERCIAL BLDG., Desc: UNSECURED COMMERCIAL BLDG.
DEMOLITION DEBRIS DEMOLITION DEBRIS
Photo# 9 File: 12 29 09 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 5 File: 12 29 05 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1
602 E 8th 524 E 8th
Desc: UNSECURED COMMERCIAL BLDG., Desc: -20X24 OLD RESIDENCE (EXTREME ROOF
DEMOLITION DEBRIS. ROT, DISREPAIR)
Photo# 7 File:t 12 07 Date: 1/12/99 Priority: 1 Photo# 1 File: l 11 10 Date: 1/11/99 Priority: 1
'~12 W 8th 910 E 8th
Desc: -16X30 GARAGE/CARPORT (EXTREME ROOF Desc: -12X12 SFR ADDITION (NON-CODE CONST.?)
ROT & SAG, LEANING)
15
Pholo# 6 File: 1 12 06 Date: 1/12/99 Priority: 1 Pholo# I File: 12 29 17 Dale: 12/29/98 Priorilv: 1
212 W 8th 627 I E 8th
Desc: -16X30 GARAGE'CARPORT (EXTREME ROOF Desc: -I 8X20 GARAGE (WALL LEAN &
ROT & SAG. LEANING) SETTLEMENT)
Photo# I File: 12 29 18 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1 Photo# I File: 12 29 10 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1
627 1 E 8th 602 E 8th
Desc: -18X20 GARAGE (WALL LEAN & Desc: UNSECURED COMMERCIAL BLDG.,
SETTLEMENT) DEMOLITION DEBRIS.
Photo# 2 File: 12 16 26 Date: 12/16/98 Priority: 1 Photo# I File: 12 28 15 Date: 12/28/98 Priority: 1
528 W 9th 222 E 9th
Desc: M6X20 GARAGE(ROOF SAG & ROT; Desc: -14X18 GARAGE (ROOF ROT, ROOF SAG,
LEANING TO SOUTH) LEANING)
16
Photo#2 File:12 16 27 Date: 12/16/98 Priority:l Photo# I File:12 28 17 Date: 12:28/98 Prioritv:l
528 W 9th 226 E 9th
Desc: --16X20 GARAGE (ROOF SAG & ROT.LEANING Desc: r-20X24 GARAGE (ROOF SAG, WEST WALL
TO SOUTH) SETTLEMENT & BOW)
Photo# I File: 12 28 14 Date: 12/28/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 1 File: 12 28 16 Date: 12/28/98 Priority: 1
222 E 9th 226 E 9th
Desc: -14X18 GARAGE (ROOF ROT,ROOF SAG, Desc: -20X24 GARAGE (ROOF SAG, WEST WALL
LEANING) SETTLEMENT & BOW)
~~~~~. Az:ff. -
Photo # 6 File: 12 16 06 Date: 12/'16/98 Priority: 1 Photo # 7 File: 12 16 07 Date: 12/16/98 Priority: 1
617 S B 617 S B
Desc: ~16X20 WOODSHED (ROT. LEAN.G, INTO Desc: -16X20 WOODSHED (ROT, LEANING, ~TO
SETBACKS) SETBACKS)
17
Photo ~ '~
~ ! File:l~ 16 11 Date: 12/16/98 Priority:l Photo# I File: 12 16 1~ Date: 12/16/98 Priority:l
602 S B 602 S B
Desc: OLD, U~FINISHED SFR;ROOF ROT,OPEN TO Desc: UNFINISHED~ OLD SFR.(ROOF ROT,FIRE
ELEMENTS,FIRE HAZARD HAZARD,OPEN TO ELEMENTS)
Photo # 2 File: 12 t6 02 Date: 12/16/98 Priority: I Photo # I File: 12 18 01 Date: 12/18/98 Priority: 1
903 S B 3512 S CANYONED
Desc: -16X 16 GARAGE (EXTREME ROOF ROT & Desc: -1 OX 10 COLLAPSED SHED
SAG: NEAR COLLAPSE)
Photo# 3 File: I 14 03 Date: 1/14/99 Priority: 1 Photo# 2 File: I 14 02 Date: 1/14/99 Priority: 1
1314 E CAROLINE 1314 E CAROLINE
Desc: SFR. SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR) Desc: SFR, SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR)
18
Photo# 2 File: 12 29 22 Date: 12/29:98 Priority: l Photo# 2 File: 12 29 25 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1
515 S CHASE 515 S CHASE
Desc: OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL Desc: OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL
SETTLEMENT) SETTLEMENT)
~.& ~-
Photo #~'~ File: I'~ 29 ~_'~ Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1 Photo # _9 File: 1"z_.29 24 Date: t2/29/98 Priority:. 1
515 S CHASE 515 S CHASE
Desc: OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL Desc: OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL
SETTLEMENT) SETTLEMENT)
Photo# 2 File: 12 29 26 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 1 File: 12 28 11 Date: 12/28/98 Priority: 1
515 S CHASE 1015 S CHASE
Desc: OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL Desc: ~-12X 18 GARAGE (ROOF ROT, LEANING,
SETTLEMENT) WALL BOW)
19
Photo# '~ File: 12 29 28 Date: 1'~'~ f Priority: 1 Photo# 9 12 29 29
~ ~.~9~,98 ~ File: Date: ....... Priority: 1
515 S CHASE 515 S CHASE
Desc: OLD SFR (EXT~ME STRUCTU~L Desc: OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTUAL
SETTLEMENT. ROT) SETTLEMENT)
Photo#~ ' File: 1~.~ 29 21 Date: 12/29/98 Priority:. I Photo# 1 File: 12 28 10 Date: 12/28/98 Priority: 1
515 S CHASE 1015 S CHASE
Desc: OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL Desc: -12Xt 8 GARAGE (ROOF ROT, LEANING)
SETTLEMENT)
Photo # 2 File: 12 29 27 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1 Photo# I File: 12 14 01 Date: 12/14/98 Priority: 1
515 S CHASE 409 S E
Desc: OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL Desc: ~16X20 GARAGE/CARPORT (WALL ROT,
SETTLEMENT, ROT) LEANING)
;: ·.
Photo# $ File: 12 17 08 Date: 12/17/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 9 File: I 13 09 Date: 1,-13~99 Priority: 1
2917 W EDGEWOOD 436 E FRONT
Desc: LARGE COLLAPSED BARN Desc: -20X20 GARAGE ('WALL BOW & LEAN. WALL
ROT)
Photo# 6 File: 1 14 06 Date: 1/14/99 Priori~,: I Photo# 5 File: 1 14 05 Date: 1/14/99 Priority: 1
1223 E FRONT 1223 E FRONT
Desc: -20X24 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG; NON- Desc: -20X24 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG; NON-
CODE ADDITION) CODE ADDITION)
Photo# 4 File: I 14 04 Date: 1/14/99 Priority: 1 Photo# 1 File: 1 14 01 Date: 1,/14/99 Priority: 1
1223 E FRONT 1339 E FRONT
Desc: -20X24 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG: NON- Desc: -24X30 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG)
CODE ADDITION)
21
....................... -i" ...............
Photo# 1 File: 1 13 11 Date: 1/13/99 Priority: I Photo# 1 File: 1 13 10 Date: 1/13/99 Priority: 1
436 E FRONT 436 E FRONT
Desc: --20X20 GARAGE (WALL BOW & LEAN, Desc: -20X20 GARAGE (WALL BOW & LEAN.
SETTLEMENT, WALL ROT) SETTLEMENT, WALL ROT)
Photo# I File: 1 15 10 Date: 1/15/99 Priority: I Photo# 8 File: I 15 08 Date: 1/15/99 Priority: 1
1103 E GEORGIANA 717 E GEORGIANA
Desc: -14X30 GAR&GE (ROOF ROT, SETTLEMENT) Desc: -12X14 METAL SHED (ROOF COLLAPSED)
Photo# 2 File: 12 14 02 Date: 12/14/98 Priority: 1 Photo# I File: I 11 01 Date: 1/tl/99 Priority: 1
1107 W GLENWOOD -100 S GOLFCOURS
Desc: -16X20 GARAGE(ROOF ROT, ROOF SAG) Desc: -6X8 SHED (ROOF & WALL ROT)
.?,
22
Photo#6 File: I 11 06 Date: 1:11/99 Priority: 1 Photo# 7 File:l_ll_07 Date: 1.11,,'99 Priority:l
102_5 E GIL&NT -104 E GRANT
Desc: .-16X16 GARAGE {ROOF & WALL ROT. Desc: -8X12 SHED (LEANING)
LEANING)
Photo# 9 File: I t5 09 Date: 1/15/99 Priority: I Photo# t File: I 15 19 Date: 1/15/99 Priority: 1
310 N JONES 218 S LAUREL
Desc: SFR (SETTLEMENT. BOARDED UP) Desc: -8X10 SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR)
Photo# 7 File: 12_28 07 Date: 12/28/98 Priority: I Photo# 6 File: 12 28 06 Date: 12/28/98 Priority: 1
3011 S LAUREL 3011 S LAUREL
Desc: i_ 12X 16 OLD SHED (ROOF ROT, ROOF SAG) Desc: -12X 16 OLD SHED (ROOF ROT,ROOF SAG)
23
Photo# 4 File: 12 25 04 Date: 12/25/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 3 File: 12 25 03 Date: 12"25/98 Priority: l
t501 W MARINE DR 1501 W MAR1NE DR
Desc: --50X60 COMMERCIAL BLDG. ( FIRE & Desc: -50X60 COMMERCIAL BLDG. ( FIRE &
STRUCTURAL DAMAGE) STRUCTUICa~L DAMAGE)
Photo# 2 File: 12 25 02 Date: 12/25/98 Priority: I Photo# 1 File: 12 25 01 Date: 12/25/98 Priority: 1
1501 W MARINE DR 1501 W MARiNE DR
Desc: -50X60 COMMERCIAL BUILDING ( FIRE & De$c: -50X60 COMMERCIAL BLDG. (FtRE &
STRUCTURAL DAMAGE) STRUCTURAL DAMAGE)
/
Photo# 5 File: 12 25 05 Date: 12/25/'98 Priority: I Photo# 7 File: 1 t4 07 Date: 1/14/99 Priority: 1
1501 W MARINE DR 1516 S MCDONALD
Desc: --50X60 COMMERCIAL BLDG. ( FIRE & Desc: SFR, CARPORT, SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR)
STRUCTURAL DAMAGE)
24
Photo# 8 File: 1 14 08 Date: 1/14/99 Priority: I Photo # 9 File: 1 14 09 Date: 1:~14/99 Priority: 1
1516 S MCDONALD 1516 S MCDONALD
Desc: SFR. CARPORT. SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR) Desc: SFR, CARPORT, SHED (ROT & DISREPAIRI
Photo# 1 File: 1 14 10 Date: 1/14/99 Priority: 1 Photo# 2 File: 12 24 02 Date: 12/24,/98 Priority: 1
1516 S MCDONALD 3204 S MCDOUGAL
Desc: SFR, CARPORT, SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR) Desc: -18X24 DETACHED GARAGE(ROOF SAG,
:~. LEANING. ROT: NEAR COLLAPSE)
Photo# I File: 12 24 01 Date: 12,/24/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 5 File: I 11 05 Date: 1/11/99 Priority: 1
2715 S OAK -113 E PARK
Desc: -18X20 DETACHED GARAGE (ROOF SAG, Desc: --12X12 SHED REMAINS
WALL SETTLEMENT, ROT)
25
Photo # 4 File: I 11 04 Date: 1:11/90 Priority: 1 Photo # 3 File: 1 11 03 Date: 1/1 t/99 Prioritx': 1
-114 E PARK 1108 E PARK
Desc: -~0X~0 BARN REMAINS Desc: --16X20 BARN (LEANING)
Photo# 4 File: 12 18 04 Date: 12/18/98 Priority: I Photo# 4 File: t2 28 04 Date: 12/28/98 Priority: 1
3707 S PARKKNOL 3301 S PEABODY
Desc: - 12X 12 COLLAPSED SHED Desc: - 14X 18 DETACHED GARAGE (ROOF ROT,
SETTLEMENT)
Photo# 2 File: 12 28 20 Date: 12/28/98 Priority: I Photo# 2 File: 12 29 20 Date: 12/29/98 Priority: 1
916 S PEABODY 609 S PEABODY
Desc: - 24X24 GARAGE (EXTREME ROOF & WALL Desc: -12XI 8 GARAGE (WALL ROT &
DAMAGE, ROT, ETC.) SETTLEMENT)
26
Photo// I File: t2 15 01 Date: 12/15/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 2 File: 12 15 02 Date: 12"15/98 Priority: I
2619 S RACE 2619 S RACE
Desc: t_ 16X20 DETACHED GARAGE (WALL & ROOF Desc: -16X20 DETACHED GARAGE (WALL & ROOF
ROT) ROT'}
Photo# 3 File: 12 14 03 Date: 12/14/98 Priority: I Photo# t File: I 15 15 Date: 1/t5,/99 Priority: 1
4201 S TRUCK RT 211 S VALLEY
Desc: -24X24 RUSTED METAL BUILDING FRAME. Desc: NON-CODE COMMERCIAL ADD1TION (SEMI
TRAILER, PREFAB OFFICE, PLYWOOD)
Photo # 5 File: 12 28 05 Date: 12/28/98 Priority: 1 Photo # 5 File: 12-15_05 Date: 12/15/98 Priority: 1
139 E VIEWCREST 137 E X,¥~IIDBY
Desc: -12X12 METAL SHED (ROOF COLLAPSED) Desc: -12X36 OLD SHEDS (WALL & ROOF ROT,
LEANING, DISREPAIR)
27
Photo# 6 File: 12 15 06 Date: 12/15/98 Priority: 1 Photo# 1 File: 1 13 14 Date: 1/13/99 Priority: 1
137 E WHIDBY 315 S WOLCOTT
Desc: -- 12X36 OLD SHEDS (WALL & ROOF ROT, Desc: - 12X 16 SIqED (ROT. OVERGROWN)
LEANING, DISREPAIR)
28
Section 2
Structures that in the judgement of the Building Official are repairable.
Abatement Priorities
03-Mar- 99
Photo#1 File:12 8 12 Date: 12/8/98 Priority:2 Photo# 1 File:12 8 13 Date: 12/8/98 Priority:2
833 W 12th 833 W 12th
Desc: -16X20 ATTACHED CARPORT(ROOF SAG) Desc: -16X20 ATTACHED CARPORT(ROOF SAG)
Photo# 7 File: 12 10 07 Date: 12/'10/98 Priority:2 Photo# 2 File: I 15 20 Date: 1/15/99 Priority:2
1303 W 16th 136 W 2ND
Desc: - 14X 14 SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR) Desc: -16X20 GARAGE (ROOF ROT, OVERGROWN)
Photo# I File:l 19 01 Date: 1/19/99 Priority:2 Photo# 8 File: 1 13 08 Date: 1/13/99 Priority:2
716 1 E 2ND IN 2/3 ALLEY 517 E 4th
Desc: ABANDONED SFR Desc: -16X20 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG,
SETTLEMENT)
Photo# 1 File:l 11 16 Dale: 1/11~99 Priority:2 Photo# I File:t tl t5 Date: 1/1t/99 Priority:2
916 E 4th 916 E 4th
Desc: GARAGE & SHED (ROOF ROT & SAG. Desc: GARAGE & SHED (ROOF ROT & SAG.
SETTLEMENT') SETTLEMENT)
Photo# 1 File: 1 11 14 Date: 1/11/99 Priority:2 Photo# 1 File: 1 11 t3 Date: 1/11,/99 Priority:2
916 E 4th 916 E 4th
Desc: GARAGE & SHED (ROOF ROT & SAG. Desc: GARAGE & SHED (ROOF ROT & SAG,
SETTLEMENT) SETTLEMENT)
Photo# 8 File: 12 16 08 Date: 12/16/98 Priority:2 Photo# 9 File: 12 16 09 Date: 12/16/98 Priority:2
840 %'" 6th 840 W 6th
Desc: RESIDENCE(FOUNDATION ROT~ OPEN TO Desc: RESIDENCE(FOUNDATION ROT, OPEN TO
ELEMENTS,BAD ELEC.,PORCH ROT, ETC) ELEMENTS,BAD ELEC.,PORCH ROT,ETC.)
Photo # 1 File: 12 16 1() Date: 12/16/98 Priority:2 Photo # I File: 1 12 11 Date: 1/12/99 Priority: 2
840 W 6th 119 W 6th
Desc: RES1DENCE(FOUqNDATION ROT,OPEN TO Desc: -18X30 GARAGE (ROOF ROT& SAG)
ELEMENTS,BAD ELEC.PORCH ROT,ETC.)
Photo# 1 File: 12 29 13 Date: 12/29/98 Priority:2 Photo# 4 File: 12 16 04 Date: 12/16/98 Priority:2
420 E 7th 731 W 7th
Desc: -10X30 SHED (ROOF ROT & ROOF BUCKLE, Desc: -16X24 GARAGE(ROOF SAG, WALLS
WALL ROT. DISREPAIR) LEANING)
Photo# 1 File:l 11 12 Date: 1/11/99 Priority:2 Photo#2 File:12 29 02 Date: 12/'29/98 Priority:2
1028 W 7th 225 E 9th
Desc: -12X18 GARAGE (OVERGROWN, DISREPAIR) Desc: -20X20 GARAGE (ROOF & WALL ROT, ROOF
SAG)
Photo# 1 File: 12 29 01 Date: 1~:29:98 Priority:2 Photo# 1 File: 12 28 18 Date: 12/28/98 Priority:2
225 E 9th 302 E 9th
Desc: -20X20 GARAGE (ROOF & WALL ROT, ROOF Desc: --12X18 SHED (SOUTH WALL SETTLEMENT,
SAG) ROOF SAG)
Photo# 2 File: 12 16 28 Date: 12/16,/98 Priority:2 Photo# 3 File: 12 18 03 Date: 12/18/98 Priority:2
532 W 9th 320 E AHLVERS RD
Desc: -I 2X24 SHED (ROOF ROT & SAG) Desc: OLD SFR/CARPORT(CARPORT WALL & ROOF
ROT,ROOF SAG)
Photo# 2 File: 12 18 02 Date: 12/18,;98 Priority:2 Photo# 3 File: 1 15 03 Date: 1/15/99 Priority:2
320 E AHLVERS RD 1221 S CHASE
Desc: OLD SFR/CARPORT(CARPORT WALL & ROOF Desc: -20X24 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & BOW,
ROT, ROOF SAG) SETTLEMENT)
Photo # 4 File: 1 15 04 Date: 1/15/99 Priority:2 Photo # 9 File: 12 17 09 Date: 12/t7/98 Priority: 2
1221 S CHASE CRITCHFIEL W. SIDE CRITCHFIELD RD.
Des¢: -20X24 GAIL~GE (ROOF ROT & BOW. Desc: --16X20 SHED(ROOF & WALL ROT)
SETTLEMENT)
Photo# I File: 12 22 01 Date: 12/22/98 Priority:2 Photo# 1 File: 12 22 11 Date: 12/22/98 Priority:2
1~.~ E EDIZ HOOK E EDIZ HOOK DOCK
Desc: -6X6 SHED(LEANING) Desc: DOCK DETERIORATION
Photo# I File: 12 22 10 Date: 12/22/98 Priority:2 Photo# 9 File: 12 22 09 Date: 12/22/98 Priority:2
E EDIZ HOOK DOCK E EDIZ HOOK DOCK
Desc: DOCK DETERIORATION Desc: DOCK DETERIORATION
Photo# 8 File: 12 22 08 Date: 12/22/9g Priority:2 Photo# 7 File: 12 22 07 Date: 12/22/98 Priority:2
E EDIZ HOOK DOCK E EDIZ HOOK DOCK
Desc: DOCK DETERIOILAT1ON Desc: DOCK DETERIORATION
Photo# 6 File: 12 22 06 Date: 12/22/98 Priority:2 Photo# 5 File: 12 22 05 Date: 12/22/98 Priority:2
1225 E EDIZ HOOK 1225 E EDIZ HOOK
Desc: -20X30 BLDG. (NORTH WALL SETTLEMENT, Desc: -20X30 BLDG. (NORTH WALL SETTLEMENT,
BROKEN WINDOWS, ETC.) BROKEN WINDOWS, ETC.)
Photo# 4 File: 12 22 04 Date: 12/22/98 Priority:2 Photo# 3 File: 12 22 03 Date: 12/22/98 Priority:2
1225 E EDIZ HOOK 1225 E EDIZ HOOK
Desc: -20X30 BLDG. (NORTH WALL SETTLEMENT, Desc: -20X30 BLDG_(NORTH WALL SETTLEMENT,
BROKEN WINDOWS, ETC.) BROKEN WINDOWS,ETC.)
Photo# 2 File: 12 22 02 Date: 12/22/98 Priority:2 Photo# 2 File: 12 28 02 Date: 12/28/98 Priority:2
1225 E EDIZ HOOK HILLCREST N. SIDE
Desc: -20X30 BLDG.(NORTH WALL Desc: OLD SFR ( UPPER BOW AT WEST WALL
SETTLEMENT,BROKEN WINDOWS, ETC.) INADEQUATE FOUNDATION)
Photo# I File: 12 23 01 Date: 12/23,/98 Priority:2 Photo# 7 File: 12 25 07 Date: 12/25,/98 Priority:2
802 S IST. 1531 W MARINEDR
Desc: -10X20 SHED (NON-CODE CONSTRUCTION) Desc: -16X20 SCALES BLDG. (ROOF & WALL
DAMAGE, UNSECURED)
Photo# 8 File: 12 25 08 Date: 12/25/98 Priority:2 Photo# 9 File: 12 25 09 Date: 12/25/98 Priority:2
1531 W MARINEDR 1531 W MARINEDR
Desc: -16X20 SCALES BLDG. ( WALL & ROOF Desc: -16X20 SCALES BLDG. (WALL & ROOF
DAMAGE, UNSECURED) DAMAGE, UNSECURED)
Photo# I File:12 25 10 Date: 12/25/98 Priority:2 Photo# I File:12 25 11 Date: 12/25/98 Priority:2
1440 W MARINE DR 1440 W MARINE DR
Desc: TAVERN (SLIDE DAMAGE) Desc: TAVERN (SLIDE DAMAGE)
Photo # I File: 12 25 12 Date: 12/25/98 Priority:2 Photo# 6 File: 12 25 06 Date: 12/25/98 Priority:2
1440 W MARINE DR 1531 W MARiNE DR
Desc: TAVERN (SLIDE DAMAGE) Desc: -16X20 SCALES BLDG. (WALL & ROOF
DAMAGE, UNSECURED)
Photo# 1 File: 12 29 12 Date: 12/29/98 Priority:2 Photo# 1 File: 1 12 15 Date: 1/12/99 Priority:2
707 S PEABODY 919 S PINE
Desc: -12X18 GARAGE (ROOF & WALL ROT, Desc: -20X20 GARAGE (LEANING TOWARD
DISREPAIR) ADJACENT BANK IMMEDIATELY EAST)
Photo# I File: 1 12 16 Date: 1/12/99 Priority:2 Photo# 4 File: 12 15 04 Date: 12/15/98 Prioritv:2
9t9 S PINE 307 E VASHON
Desc: --20X20 GARAGE (LEANING IOWARD Desc: TWO,-6X20 NON-CODE WOODSHEDS -(TWO)
ADJACENT BANK IMMEDIATELY TO EAST) ,(BLDG. DIV TO VERIFY SIZES AND
ABATEMENT)
Photo#3 File:12 15 03 Date: 12/15/98 Priority:2
307 E VASHON
Desc: TWO, -6X20 NON-CODE WOODSHEDS (BLDG.
DIV. TO VERIFY SIZES AND ABATEMENT)
Abatement Priorities
03-Mar-99
Photo# 2 File: 12 16 29 Date: 12/16/98 Priority:23
624 W 10th
Desc: -20X20 DETACHED GARAGE(ROOF
ROT,WALLS LEANING(STRUCTURE NEAR
BANK LINE))
Section 3
Structures that am a potential attractive nuisance.
Abatement Priorities
03-Mar-99
Photo# 5 File: 12 18 05 Date: 12/18/98 Priority:3 Pholo#1 File:l 13 12 Date: 1/13/99 Priority: 3
524 W 10th -629 E 1st
Desc: --16X20 DETACHED GARAGE(EXTREME Desc: -20X30 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG)
ROOF SAG. WALL ROT) -~
Photo# 7 File:l 15 07 Date: 1/15/99 Priority:3 Photo#6 File: I 15 06 Date: 1/15/99 Priority:3
-924 E 2ND -924 E 2ND
Desc: -20X24 GARAGE t. OVERGROWN, SUSPECT Desc: -20X24 GARAGE (OVERGROWN, SUSPECT
ROT.) ROT)
Photo# 3 File: 1_13 03 Date: 1/13/99 Priority:3
520 E 2nd
Desc: OLD SFR (COMPLETE DISREPAIR, NO
ROOFING)
Photo# 9 File: 12 28 09 Date: 12125195 Priority:3 Photo# I File: 12 23 t0 Date: 12/23/98 Priority:3
1418 E 4th 1710 W 4th
Desc: --10X12 GAILa, GE ADDITION (INTO SIDE Desc: -16X20 NEW CARPORT (INTO REAR
SETBACK: EXISTING GARAGE SETBACKS & SETBACKS_PERMIT??)
LOFT QUESTIONABLE..PERMITS ON BOTH??)
Photo# 7 File: 1 13 07 Date: 1/13/99 Priority:3 Photo# 6 File: I t3 06 Date: 1/13/99 Priority:3
204 S ALBERT 204 S ALBERT
Desc: SFR. SHED, GARAGE (ROT & DISREPAIR) Desc: SFR, SHED, GARAGE (ROT & DISREPAIR)
Photo# 5 File: I 13 05 Date: 1/13/99 Priority:3 Photo# 4 File: 1 13 04 Date: 1/13/99 Priority:3
204 S ALBERT 204 S ALBERT
Desc: SFR, SHED, GARAGE (ROT & DISREPAIR) Desc: SFR, SHED, GARAGE (ROT & DISREPAIR)
Photo# 3 File: 12 28 03 Date: 12/28;98 Priority:3
3301 S PEABODY
Desc: --8X16 GA}L&GE ADDll'ION (iNTO SIDE
SETBACK....L.rNFINISHED'}
Section 4
Structures that are currently noncompliant with current codes and
regulations
Abatement Priorities
03-3, iar-99
Photo# I File: I 15 01 Date: 1/15/99 Priority:4 Photo# 1 File: I 11 17 Date: 1/11/99 Priority:4
502 E I ITH 1102 E 4th
Desc: NEW - t2XI8 CARPORT (PERMIT?; INTO SIDE Desc: -12X16 METAL CARPORT (INTO SIDE &
SETBACK?) REAR SETBACKS?. PERMIT?)
Photo# 9 File: 1 11 09 Date: 1/11/99 Priority:4 Photo# 7 File: 12 23 07 Date: 12/23/98 Priority:4
1734 E 5th 1734 W 6th
Desc: -10X16 WOODSHED (NON-CODE CONST., Desc: -16X24 GARAGE ADDN. (BUILT TO PROP.
iNTO REAR SETBACK?) LINE, NO IHR. WALL BET. HOUSE &
GARAGE..PERMIT??)
Photo# 9 File: 1 12 09 Date: 1/12/99 PrioriD':4 Photo# 8 File: 12 ~"'
~_, 08 Date: 12/23/98 Priorit):4
- 2Il W 7th 1721 W 7th
Desc: --12X 16 CARPORT (PVC CONSTRUCTION. Desc: --SX 16 WOODSHED ADDN(RECENTLY
INTO REAR SETBACK) REBUILT. INTO REAR SETBACKS. PERMIT??)
Photo//3 File: 12 23 03 Date: 12/23/98 Priority:4 Photo// I File: 12 29 ll Date: 12/29/98 Priority:4
1616 W 7th 309 E 8th
Desc: ~12X24 ATTACHED CARPORT (NON-CODE Desc: ~10X20 WOODSHED (NON-CODE, INTO SIDE
PIERS, INTO SIDE SETBACKS, PERMIT?) SETBACK?)
Photo# 4 File: 12 29 04 Date: 12/29/98 Priority:4 Photo// I File: 12 16 01 Date: 12/16/98 Priority:4
317 E 8th 737 W 9th
Desc: - 10X20 WOODSHED BUILT TO SIDE PROP. Desc: ~12X 16 PVC TUBE/TARP GARAGE (NON-
LINE) CODE CONSTRUCTION, INTO SIDE
SETBACKS)
2
Photo# 2 File: 12 28 22 Date: 12/28/98 Priority:4 Photo# I File: 12 28 19 Date: 12/28/98 Priority:4
524 E 9th 324 E 9th
Desc: OLD,SINGLE WIDE TRAILER (GAS & ELEC. Desc: -18X18 CARPORT (BUILT TO SIDE PROP.
HOOKED UP) LINE....PERMIT??)
Photo# 3 File: 12 29 03 Date: 12/29/98 Priority:4 Photo# 1 File: 1 11 11 Date: 1/11/99 Priority:4
217 E 9th 936 E 9th
Desc: - 12X 16 METAL CARPORT (NO Desc: -12X 16 CARPORT (NON-CODE
FOUNDATION?, PERMIT??) CONSTRUCTION)
Photo# 2 File: 12 28 21 Date: 12/28/98 Priority:4 Photo# 3 File: 12 16 03 Date: 12/16/98 Priority:4
-422 E 9th 1015 S B
Desc: -16X16 GARAGE ADDITION (BUILT TO SIDE Desc: SKATE RAMP (IN CITY'S "B" STREET R/W)
PROP. LINE; POSSIBLY INTO REAR SETBACK)
Photo# 8 File: I 11 08 Date: 1/11/99 Priority:4 Photo# 7 File: 12 17 07 Date: 12,'17/98 Priority:4
1142 E CRAIG W EDGEWOOD E/OLOWERELWHA
Desc: --8X 16 WOODSHED (INTO SIDE SETBACK) RD.- 1000'
Desc: OLD SEMI TRAILER
Photo# 5 File: 12 23 05 Date: 12/23/98 Priority:4 Photo# 8 File: 12 28 08 Date: 12/28/98 Priority:4
607 S Iq ST. 405 S JONES
Desc: -12X18 SHED (INTO SETBACKS; BUILT UP TO Desc: -20X20 METAL CARPORT CNEW; INTO
PROP. LINE (ON SKIDS) ) SETBACKS?...PERMIT??)
Photo# 3 File: 12 24 03 Date: 12/24/98 Priority:4 Photo# 1 File: 12 28 01 Date: 12/28/98 Priority:4
808 W MARINEDR 3011 S REGENT
Desc: -12X 16 NON-CODE COMMERCIAL ADDITION Desc: -16X20 PVC / TARP BUILDING (NON-CODE;
(PERMIT??) SITS ON LOT TO SOUTH OF 3011 REGENT
(SAME OWNERSHIP))
Abatement Report
22-Feb-99
ID Location description
~' "i~'24i W I 10th I ~16X20 DETACHED GARAGE (ROOF ROT. LEANING)
!99 524 ,. I 10th ~16X20 DETACHED GARAGE(EXTREME ROOF SAG. WALL
ROT)
~ ~ ~20X20 DETACHED GARAGE(ROOF ROT,WALLS
i~4 624 i WI 10th I ~ LEANING(STRUCTURE NEAR BANK LINE))
i~' 2016i Wt loth J ~1§X20 SHED(FLOOR & ROOF ROT)
i32 2236iW I 10th ! ~18X20& 12x16 WOODSHEDS (NON-CODE
:CONSTRUCTION)
i38 '~1133:1 ~-] ......... ~ ..... ] DEMOLISHED REMAINS OF -16X20 DETACHED GARAGE.
[3~ ! 935 i W ........... ~t~ ..... ) I DEMOLISHED ~20X26 BUILDING REMAINS
140 i 9~W 10th ~8X8 SHED (ROT, LEANING)
i41 J 935 !W 10th ~16X20 DETACHED GARAGE(ROOF SAG. LEANING,WALL
' ROT)
!42 935 W I 10th I 1~16X20 DETACHED GARAGE(ROOF SAG, LEANING, WALL
ROT)
!43 1024 W I 10th ~16X20 DETACHED GARAGE (ROOF ROT, LEANING)
i209 i 317 W t 11th TWO SHEDS (ROOF ROT & SAG, SETTLEMENT)
317 W 11th TWO SHEDS (ROOF ROT & SAG, SETTLEMENT)
i246 502 E! 11TH NEW ~ 12X18CARPORT (PERMIT?; INTO SIDE SETBACK?)
i46 1237~, W I 11th ~16X20 DETACHED GARAGE (PARTIAL ROOF & WALL
COLLAPSING)
i= ! ~33 '~ I 13h I -16X~0 ATTACHED CARPORT(ROOF SAG)
il0 '~24 W) 12th [ ~16 X 24 DETACHED GARAGE ( ROOF SAG & GENERAL
DETEmORAT~ON)
!' ' S2~-~W-[ l:"h I ~~SX2~ GARAGE (ROOF SAG, ROOF ROTS GENE~L
DETERIORATION)
ifs 530 iWi 12th 1 ~16X20 DETACHED GARAGE( WALL ROT, WALL SAG)
if2 524 i ~ ..... 1~ ......... ~16X24 DETACHED GARAGE(ROOF SAG, GENERAL
DETERIORATION)
!26 ii028 W i ........ _1.~_h~ _._J ~16X20 DETACHED GARAGE (LEANING, WALL & ROOF
ROT)
i16 530 W ~ 12th -16X20 DETACHED GARAGE( WALL ROT, WALL SAG)
!21 833 W i 12th ~16X20 ATTACHED CARPORT(ROOF SAG)
if4! 530 ,IW ! 12th ~16X20 DETACHED GARAGE(WALL ROT; WALL SAG)
[27 932 !W~ 12th ~8X14 SHED (ROOF SAG, GENERAL DETERIORATION)
~---- ~1246 1 5t6 i E ~ 12TH ~16X16 GARAGE (ROOF BOW, LEANING, SETTLEMENT)
i15 '"~ 524-~/~'[ ~ ~16X24 DETACHED GARAGE(ROOF SAG, GENERAL
~DETERIORATION)
i2S i1028[W I 12th I ~16.v.20 DETACHED GARAGE (LEANING, WALL & ROOF
~ROT)
i. w I I ~1OXlO ATT^O.ED S.ED(GE.ERAL DETERIORA. ON)
, ~16X20 DETACHED GARAGE (LEANING, WALL & ROOF
ROT)
i6 107 Ei 13th 16x20 GARAGE (SEVERE WALL SPLIT & ROT)
ils 501WI 13th ~8X18 SHED(GENERAL DETERIORATION)
i$ 107i E j 13th 16x20 GARAGE (SEVERE WALL SPLIT & ROT)
~i ~01 '; W| 13~ -~XlS SHED(GENERAL DETERiORATiON)
~--~ ~'T 1~ e~20 SHED (EXmEME DETEmORA~ON)
14th ~24X24 DETACHED GARAGE(OLD,GENERAL ]
DETERIORATION & ROT}
I~ i ~ i w I ~4th I ~24x24 DETACHED GARAGE(OLD, GENERAL
DETERIORATION & ROT)
'4 i 117i E 14th I 12x20GAGAGE(ROOFSAG)
128 ~I02, W 15th I ~8X16 CARPORT (LEANING, NON-CODE CONSTRUCTION)tI
15th I S/E CORNER 15TH & EVANS I ~12 X 12 METAL SHED(ROOF COLLAPSED)AND -10 X20
SHED(GENERAL DETERIORATION) ,,
1
ID Location description
i INTO SIDEYARD SETBACKS)
i30 i1303iW ! 16th I ] -14X14 SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR)
iDl 12800! W i 18thI (GUN CLUB) i ~24X60 GUN cLuB BLDG.(WALL ROT ,WALLS LEANING &
WALLS KICKING OUT AT BASE,ROOF DISTORTION)
i90 i2800i w l 18th I (GUN CLUB) -24X60 GUN CLUB BLDG(WALL ROT,WALLS LEANING &
WALLS KICKING OUT AT BASE,ROOF DISTORTION)
i89 i28001i W I 18th I (GUN CLUB) ~24X60 GUN CLUB BLDG. (WALL ROT,WALLS LEANING &
WALLS KICKING OUT AT BASE,ROOF DISTORTION)
~ i ~ ~2~ X 2(7 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & GENERAL
DETERIORATION,
OLD.)
LB. 7__~2~87° i w [ ..... ~8~h ..... T ................ (~J~l~c-~ ~-~i- .......... ~24x6o GUN CLUB BLDG(WALL ROT,WALLS LEANING &
WALLS KICKING OUT AT BASE,ROOF DISTORTION)
I ....... ,' [ (GUN CLUB) ~24X60 GUN CLUB BLDG.(WALL ROT,WALLS LEANING &
i WALLS KICKING OUT AT BASE,ROOF DISTORTION)
i i- l lm_ r (GUN CLUB) GUN CLUB BLDG.(WALL ROT,WALLS LE N,NG &
i WALLS KICKING OUT AT BASE,ROOF DISTORTION)
[~$. ~ 2g001WIi ~ 18th ~1 (GUN CLUB) ~24X~0 GUN CLUB BLDG.(WALL ROT,WALLS LEANING &
~ WALLS KICKING OUT AT BASE,ROOF DISTORTION)
~3~ j=_b"29-i-E- 1st ~20X30 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG)
23'/ i~62gi E 1st ~20X30 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG)
2~5 1 716 i E 2ND IN 2/3 ALLEY ABANDONED SFR
[~~E J 2ND ~20X24 GARAGE (OVERGROWN, SUSPECT ROT)
~.260 !i ~924 ]+__ J~- 2ND ~20X24 GARAGE (OVERGROWN, SUSPECT ROT)
]20I ] 316 i W 2ND ~16X16 GARAGE/CARPORT(ROOF BOW, LEAN,NC)
]221 ] 520 ] E 2nd OLD SFR (COMPLETE DISREPAIR, NO ROOFING)
249 i~9281 E 2ND ~8XI0 SHED (OVERGROWN, ROT)
12~/9 i 301 ] E 2nd ' ~8X12 SHED ( ON TRAILER)
[264 i 136 W 2ND ~16X20 GARAGE (ROOF ROT, OVERGROWN)
i262 i 316 W 2ND -16X16 GARAGF_JCARPORT (ROOF BOW, LEANING)
12~6 i"3RD W 3RD W 3RD & VALLEY APARTMENT BUILDING, 2 SHEDS (ROT & DISREPAIR)
!VALE,
!NY
i APA
iRTMi
ENT;
1258 W 3RD W 3RD & VALLEY APARTMENT BUILDING, 2 SHEDS (ROT & DISREPAIR)
!3RD '
&
~VALL!
',NY
i APAI
!RTM
i ENT i
i260 i~315i W } 3RD ~8Xt0 SHED (OVERGROWN, ROT)
i233 i 1215! E t 3rd ~12X24 CARPORT SHELL (NON-CODE CONST.)
&
tVALL[
APAI
ENT
12~ 1710i W 4th I ~16X20 NEW CARPORT (INTO REAR
1203 [ 9t6 [ E I 4th I GARAGE & SHED (ROOF ROT & SAG, SETTLEMENT)
114~ i 1418'! E i 4th i ' I ~10X12 GARAGE ADDITION (il~'ro SIDE SETBACK;
~ EXISTING GARAGE SETBACKS & LOFT
QUESTIONABLE_PERMITS ON BOTH'7?)
266 429 Wi 4TH GARAGE REMAINS
200 916 E i 4th GARAGE & SHED (ROOF ROT & SAG, SETTLEMENT)
202 916 E I 4th ' GARAGE & SHED (ROOF ROT & SAG, SETTLEMENT)
!226 517 i ~ 4th ~16X20 GARAGE (ROOF ROT& SAG, SETTLEMENT)
!201 i 916 i E i 4th GARAGE & SHED (ROOF ROT & SAG, SETTLEMENT)
I ~''/
i2 6 ! 212 i W 4th -16X20 GARAGE (ROOF ROT)
i::~:i;~)$jll08i!:~: E i 4th ~16X20 GARAGE ( ROOF & WALL ROT)
!2o4 i1102i E i 4th ~12X16 METAL CARPORT (INTO SIDE & REAR
SETBACKS?, PERMIT?)
170 . 814 i Wi 5th .... -16X20 GARAGE(ROOF ROT,LEANING)
, 521 W 5th OLD SINGLE WIDE TRAILER (UNOCCUPIED)
,~3 5th NW CORNER W 5TH & CEDAR 3 SEMI VANS BEING USED AS STORAGE STRUCTURES;
INTO SETBACKS & 5TH ST. RNV.
;~Tf ~ 814 W l 5th ~16X20 GARAGE (ROOF ROT, WALLS LEANING)
i79 -521 W 5th OLD, SINGLEWIDE TRAILER;UNOCCUPIED
72~ ,! W t 5th NW CORNER W 5TH & CEDAR 3 SEMI VANS BEING USED AS STORAGE STRUCTURES;
INTO SETBACKS & 5TH ST. RNV
i'~20 i1606iW J 5th I ~20X20 DETACHED GARAGE (ROOF ROT & ROOF SAG,
LEANING,SETTLEMENT)
11'*$ i 312 .l E_ I 5th I OLD SFR/GARAGE( WALL ROT & SETTLEMENT,
~ DISREPAIR)
ila7 i 312 i E I 5th ] OLD SFRfGARAGE (WALL ROT & SETTLEMENT,
~ DISREPAIR)
i`/88 312 E l 5th I OLD SFR/GARAGE (WALL ROT& SETTLEMENT,
~ DISREPAIR)
!'/96 '! 1734 E t 5th ~ ~10X16 WOODSHED (NON-CODE CONST., INTO REAR
~ SETBACK?)
!47_ . 924 W j 6th j OLD ~20X40 RESIDENCE (EYESORE, LACK OF
i MAINTENANCE; BUILDING DIV. TO VERIFY ABATEMENT.)
i WI 6th i RESIDENCE(FOUNDATION ROT, OPEN TO
J
ELEMENTS,BAD ELEC.,PORCH ROT,FTC.)
i?$ ~-~N! 6th I ~16X16 CARPORT(ROOF ROT,ROOF SAG; UNDERSIZED
ROOF BEAMS)
~J37 Jt922 ~ W! 6th I i -16X16 CARPORT (ROOF ROT, ROOF SAG,UNDERSIZED
ROOF BEAMS)
i64 ! 840 i WJ 6th [ RESIDENCE(FOUNDATION ROT, OPEN TO
ELEMENTS,BAD ELEC.,PORCH ROT, FTC)
!66 i ~0 i Wt ~' ) RESIDENCE(FOU.DATION ROT,OPEN TO
ELEMENTS,BAD ELEC,PORCH ROT,ETC.)
!~7 s~7 iwI eh I -~BX2~GARAGE/CARPORT(WALLCRACKS,ROOF
D~STORTION)CARPORT AT S. S~DE NOT SHOWN)
!78 S~? !Wt ~th I ~4SX~ ~RAGE/CARPORT(WALL CRACKS,ROOF
DISTORTION)
i207)216 119 i.W~/j; 6th [ ~18X30 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG)
i214 I 119 6th ~18X30 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG)
i 704 6th ~14X18 GARAGE (EXTREME ROT, DtSREPAIR...NEAR
COLLAPSE)
i'~ I ~_~w I ~ I ~~8x2~ GARAGE ADDN. (BUILT TO PROP. UNE, .O ~HR.
WALL BET. HOUSE & GARAGE..PERMITW)
133 11922 W 7th I ~16X20DETACHEDGARAGE(WALL&ROOFROT)
~13 ;1-710 W 7th -t0X14 ATTACHED SHED (NON-CODE CONST, INTO SIDE
SETBACKS)
,1~616 ! WI 7th J ~12X24 ATTACHED CARPORT (NON-CODE PIERS, INTO
SIDE SETBACKS, PERMIT?)
t1431 Wj ?th ~t0Xl0 METAL SHED (ROOF COLLAPSED)
(35 ( 1922 ) ~,~1 7th ~16X20 DETACHED GARAGE(WALL & ROOF ROT)
, i I 7th ~8X16WOODSHED ADDN(RECENTLY REBUILT, INTO
REAR SETBACKS, PERMIT'7?)
ID Location description
~.i'/'/511424, Wi 7th I .... ~12Xt6 SHED ADI~ITION (INTO SIDE SETBACKS; BUILT TO
PROP. LINE.)
170420 E..~i 7th I -10X30 SHED (ROOF ROT & ROOF BUCKLE, WALL ROT..
DISREPAIR)
.......i$1 731 W i~ 7th ~16X24 GARAGE (ROOF SAG, WALLS LEANINGs,
7'~ 5t9 W i 7th ~16X20 GARAGE (ROOF ROT,ROOF SAG)
76 509 W i 7th -16X18 GARAGE (EXTREME ROOF & WALL ROT, ROOF
SAG)
i341922Wl 7th I -16X20 DETACHED GARAGE{WALL & ROOF ROT)
74519 Wt' 7th '1 ~16X2.0 GARAGE (ROOF ROT, ROOF SAG)
i00 i 731 '+W 7th ~t6X24 GARAGE(ROOF SAG, WALLS LEANING)
.,~I ......... 512 ~"E j 7th I SEMI TRAILER USED AS STORAGE BUILDING
17,5317 E 7th i ~14X14"GARAGE"ADDN. TOSFR (NON-CODE CONST.,
INTO SIDE SETBACKS?)
i1~69 i 420 E I 7th I ~IOX30 SHED (ROOF ROT & ROOF BUCKLE, WALL ROT,
DISREPAIR)
if991 Ii 1028ii W 7th ~12X18 GARAGE (OVERGROWN, DISREPAIR)
!206 1716 i E I 7th ~t0X10 SHED (ROOF ROT, LEANING (ON HILLSIDE))
?/2~118i ~ W- 7th ~16X30 GARAGE (OVERGROWN, ROOF ROT)
i ~1-~-~ W ! 7th -12X16 CARPORT (PVC CONSTRUCTION, INTO REAR
SETBACK)
i172 i 610 -- 7th ~ ~20X20 GARAGE (EXTREME ROOF ROT; SETTLEMENT)
~)"~, ~1-0~V 8th t -12X12 SFR ADDITION (NON-CODE CONST.?)
! 212 8th ~16X30 GARAGE/CARPORT (EXTREME ROOF ROT & SAG,
i LEANING)
i2'/t~ 212 !WI 8th I t~16X30GARAGE/CARPORT(EXTREME ROOF ROT & SAG,
' LEANING)
i~60 i 317 ~-~-l 8th t ~10X20 WOODSHED
(BUILT
TO
SIDE
PROP.
LINE)
~-!E l 8th |, ~18X20 GARAGE (WALL LEAN & SETTLEMENT)
i173627 ! E ! 8th I i ~18X20 GARAGE (WALL LEAN & SETTLEMENT)
if67 i 309 i E 8th ~10X20 WOODSHED (NON-CODE, INTO SIDE SETBACK?)
!f6~ i 602 E 8th I UNSECURED COMMERCIX~.~~.
if65i 602 i E I 8th /UNSECURED COMM~R~
i162 i 524 E t 8th ~20X24OLD RESIDENCE (EXTREME ROOF ROT,
DISREPAIR)
ifEI ~ 5'24 i E j 8th ] ~20X24 OLD RESIDENCE (EXTREME ROOF ROT,
DISREPAIR)
i57 i 737 i W i 9th ~ ~12X16 PVC TUBE/TARP GARAGE (NON-CODE
CONSTRUCTION, INTO SIDE SETBACKS)
i82528 W 9th 1~16X20 GARAGE (ROOF SAG & ROT,LEANING TO SOUTH)
!~3532 W 9th -12X24 SHED (ROOF ROT & SAG)
i8'/ 528 "W 9th ~16X20 GARAGE(ROOF SAG & ROT; LEANING TO SOUTH)
149222 i E 9th ~14X18 GARAGE (ROOF ROT, ROOF SAG, LEANING)
i198 ~ 936 E 9th
~ j ~12X16 CARPORT (NON-CODE CONSTRUCTION)
if56 ~. 524 E 9th OLD,SINGLE WIDE TRAILER (GAS & ELEC. HOOKED UP)
~'/~ i 217 '~ E 9th ~12X16 METAL CARPORT (NO FOUNDATION~ PERMIT'S)
i163 i 324 iE 9th -t8X18 CARPORT (BUILT TO SIDE PROP.
LINE....PERMIT??)
IrE0 i 226 jE I 9th I ~20X2.4 GARAGE (ROOF SAG, WEST WALL SETTLEMENT
if'~ 222 E 9th I ~&BOW)
~14X18 GARAGE (ROOF ROT,ROOF SAG, LEANING)
i IE / ~12X18 SHED (SOUTH WALL SETTLEMENT, ROOF SAG)
t
i r j ............... ~16X16 GARAGE ADDITION (BUILT TO SIDE PROP. LINE;
~ POSSIBLY INTO REAR SETBACK)
',,.__~ilI~57 1225 I E t 9th t ~20X20 GARAGE (ROOF & WALL ROT, ROOF SAG)
~225 i Ej 9th I ~20X20 GARAGE (ROOF & WALL ROT, ROOF SAG)
~;~'*i 'E / 9th ~20X24 GARAGE (ROOF SAG, WEST WALL SETTLEMENT
& BOW)
4
ID Location desc~p~ion
~197 320 E j, AHLVERS RD J R/ ( O AL R F T,R
! SAG)
i~6 .... 320 i' E i AHLVERS RD I iOLD SFR/CARPORT(CARPORT WALL & ROOF ROT, ROOF
SAG)
~-6'~ i.~_602 S j B OLD, UNFINISHED SFR;ROOF ROT,OPEN TO
ELEMENTS,FIRE HAZARD
!63 617 S I ~16X20WOODSHED (ROT, LEANING. INTO SETBACKS)
~ j 617 i S j B ~16X20 WOODSHED (ROT, LEANING, INTO SETBACKS)
j 10151 S B J SKATE RAMP (tN CITY'S "B" STREET RNV)
__J," i 903 .~. B j -16X16 GARAGE (EXTREME ROOF ROT & SAG; NEAR
COLLAPSE)
188 .~' B J UNFINISHED, OLD SFR.(ROOF ROT,FIRE HAZARD,OPEN
TO ELEMENTS)
~3~2i S CANYONEDGE DR ~I0Xl0COLLAPSED SHED
!238 i. 1314! E CAROLINE SFR, SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR)
1237 13141 E CAROLINE SFR, SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR)
,1178 515 i--=r S CHASE OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL SETTLEMENT)
ilTe 515 i S CHASE OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL SETTLEMENT)
781 T~'~-S CHASE OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL SETTLEMENT)
I S CHASE OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL SETTLEMENT, ROT)
f85 i 515 j S CHASE OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTUAL SETTLEMENT)
j'/~0 i 515 S CHASE OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL SETTLEMENT)
!247 j 1221 i S CHASE ~20X24 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & BOW, SETTLEMENT)
~ 11221 ! S' CHASE ~20X24 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & BOW, SETTLEMENT)
J~-~ ~3 i S J CHASE OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL SETTLEMENT, ROT)
~';15 [ S j CHASE OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL SETTLEMENT)___,
~--. ;
,I47 ;t0t5i S j CHASE ~12X18 GARAGE (ROOF ROT, LEANING, WALL SOW)
?~6. ,i~°'~s!~ s , CHASE ~~'~8 GARAGE (ROOF ROT, L~N~NG)
i182 515 i S CHASE OLD SFR (EXTREME STRUCTURAL SETTLEMENT)
i~'~ i 1451 '~'- CRAIG ~8X16 WOODSHED (INTO SIDE SETBACK)
i94 CRITCHFIELD RD W. SIDE CRITCHFIELD RD. ~16X20 SHED(ROOF & WALL ROT)
i'~48 i 409 i S E -16X20 GARAGE/CARPORT (WALL ROT, LEANING)
]92 i ! W EDGEWOOD DR E/O LOWER ELWHA RD.~t000' OLD SEMI TRAILER
J93 i2917iW EDGEWOOD DR LARGE COLLAPSED BARN
~ ...... ~' EDIZ HOOK DOCK DOCK DETERIORATION
[109 I i E EDIZ HOOK DOCK DOCK DETERIORATION
if08 i i E EDIZ HOOK DOCK DOCK DETERIORATION
fO7 J E
I~0~ ~i E j EDIZ HOOK DOCK DOCK DETERIORATION
· E~DIZ HOOK ~20x30 BLDG. (NORTH WALL SETTLEMENT, BROKEN
~W~NDOWS, ETC.)
i~--',~! El E~ZHOOK ~1 ~~0X30~LD~,(NORTHWALLS~TTLE~NT,~ROKEN
WINDOWS, ETC.)
!111! ~~E- ~- -- - ' E ~) IZ-H'~ (~ ......... I ....................I~ ~- ........ DOCK DETERIORATION
~Ej~i E ] ED~ HOOK t ~20X30 SLOG(NORTHWALL SETTLEMENT, BROKEN
i WINDOWS,ETC.)
~. t.~.~'[ ED~HOOK I I ~20X30BLDG.(NORTHWALLSETTLEMENT,BROKEN
WINDOWS, ETC.)
i.o. i,~j EI ED~HOOK J -~X~SHED(LE^.,.G)
I~ J~iE j EDIZ HOOK ~ ~20X30 BLDG. (NORTH WALL SETTLEMENT, BROKEN
W~NDOWS, ETC.)
j;=6 j12z3j EI FRONT J. ~20X24 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG; NON-CODE
ADDITION)
~23[ E J FRONT J ~20X24 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG; NON--CODE
ADDITION)
j240 J1223j E J FRONT I ~20X24 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & SAG; NON- CODE
ADDITION)
ID Ce, cation ~descri ,l~i~
i236 i 1339i E! FRONT i [ _24X30 GARAGE (ROOF ROT & iSAG) I '
F2~--i-~ i E, FRONT i I ~20X20 GARAGE (WALL BOW & LEAN, SETTLEMENT,
WALL ROT)
i~t i -20X20 GARAGE (WALL BOW & LEAN, WALL ROT)
i227 i 436 _ FRONT ...... t i ~20X20 GARAGE (WALL BOW & LEAN, SETTLEMENT,
__ _ ~ WALL ROT)
254 1103i E i GEORGIANA I I ~14X30 GARAGE (ROOF ROT, SETTLEMENT)
~ il~OT!W~ G'ENWOOD I . ~~6~GARAGE(ROOF ROT. ROOF SAG)
~', !~~oo', ~ GOLF COURSE RD
, 4 · I ~6X8 SHED (ROOF & WALL ROT)
~ GRANT T
--i 8 ~ i ~8X12 SHED (LEANING)
i'/93 11025 E t GRANT ~16X16GARAGE (ROOF&WALL ROT, LEANING)
ills6 607~i Si H ST. ~12X18 SHED (INTO SETBACKS; BUILT UP TO PROP. LINE
, (ON SKIDS) )
j I3S ! I HILLCREST DR I N SIDE OLD SFR ( UPPER BOW AT WEST WALL, INADEQUATE
FOUNDATION)
~44 ~ -10X20 SHED (NON-CODE CONSTRUCTION)
s JONES METAL CARPORT (NEW ,.TO
SETBACKS?...PERM,T )
~ 711 s I ~Expo S,ED (ROT & D~SREPA~R)
LAUREL ~12X~S OLD SHED (ROOF ROT, ROOF SAG)
~i ~i S I LAUREL I ~12XlS OLD SHED (ROOF ROT,ROOF SAG)
4401W ] MARINE DR I TAVERN (SLIDE DAMAGE)
501 ! W ! MARINE DR ~50X60 COMMERCIAL BLDG. ( FIRE & STRUCTURAL
DAMAGE)
it$$ i1531 i WI MARINE DR I ~16X20 SCALES BLDG. (WALL & ROOF DAMAGE,
UNSECURED)
i~34 1440iW I MARINE DR I TAVERN (SLIDE DAMAGE)
if3~ 1531 i W.~ MARINE DR ~ ~~6X20 SCALES BLDG. (WALL & ROOF DAMAGE,
UNSECURED)
i//3_~. 1531 i W i ~ MARtNE DR j ~16X20 SCALES BLDG (WALL & ROOF DAMAGE,
UNSECURED)
1440i W I MARINE DR TAVERN (SLIDE DAMAGE)
?36 !
!fZ, i1501 j WI MARINE DR ~50X60 COMMERCIAL BLDG. ( FIRE & STRUCTURAL
DAMAGE)
i127 !~1__5~_1j_W_ I MARINE DR
DAMAGE)
i~ ?;1~1' ['~/~/'t ....M-A'R~'I~:~D~ ...... l ~50X60 COMMERCIAL BUILDING ( FIRE & STRUCTURAL
DAMAGE)
F~s !~'~o~ w I MARINE DR I ~50X~0 COMMERCIAL BLDG. (F~RE & STRUCTURAL
DAMAGE)
i124 808 W MARINE DR t -123(16 NON-CODE COMMERCtALADDITION (PERMIT??.)
UNSECURED)
1241 J1516 S I MCDONALD SFR, CARPORT, SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR)
i242 11516i S MCDONALD SFR, CARPORT, SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR)
[243 i1516' 8 MCDONALD
i. [ , SFR, CARPORT, SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR)
[244 1516 S MCDONALD SFR, CARPORT, SHED (ROT & DISREPAIR)
[12.3 '3_L~_ I S , MCDOUGAL ~18X24 DETACHED GARAGE(ROOF SAG, LEANING, ROT:
NEAR COLLAPSE)
,~/22 i2715, S I OAK I ~18X20 DETACHED GARAGE (ROOF SAG, WALL
SETTLEMENT, ROT)
i~}~:' i3i E I PARK I ~~X~ SHED REMAiNs
1190 1' )8 E PARK I J ~16X20 BARN (LEANiNG)
J"' i-' ~ E l PAR,: ~~x~ BARN REMA,.S
7 7 S PEABODY . ~12X18 GARAGE (ROOF & WALL ROT, DISREPAIR)
ID Locat~n descril~ion
i139 133011 ~ i PEABODY I i ~8X16 GARAGE ADDITION (INTO SIDE
SETBACK,.,,UNFtNtSHED)
i~.~40~i..~i ~ S
if64 916 S
ROT, ETC.)
f76 609 S
i2'/8 919 S
IMMEDIATELY TO EAST)
i~2~_7_,71_9_ ~ S~[ PINE j -20X20 GARAGE (LEANING TOWARD ADJACENT BANK
IMMEDIATELY EAST)
i$~-"-~;~'~'~'i~"~'! ......... -R~E ........ ~16x20 DETACHED GARAGE (WALL & ROOF ROT)
i61 !2619 S ~ RACE ~ ~16X20 DETACHED GARAGE (WALL & ROOF ROT)
i'/37 130111 S i REGENT ~16X20 PVC / TARP BUILDING (NON-CODE; SITS ON LOT
i TO SOUTH OF 3011 REGENT (SAME OWNERSHIP))
~i50 ,!4201 S TRUCKRT ] ~24X24 RUSTED METAL BUILDING FRAME_
i??.9~ i 211 S i~ALLE~_ .........J NON-CODE COMMERCIAL ADDITION (SEMI TRAILER,
i PREFAB OFFICE, PLYWOOD)
i2~ i 10391 S t VALLEY I SFR; GENERAL DETERIORATION; ( NOTE: BUILDING SITS
~ APPROX. 40% INTO CITY'S t '1 TH STREET RAN. )
64 307 E
i DIV TO VERIFY SIZES AND ABATEMENT)
153 307 ~ E i VASHON [ TWO, ~6X20 NON-CODE WOODSHEDS (BLDG. DIV. TO
VERIFY SIZES AND ABATEMENT)
i'/4'~ i 139 E
~ ! -12X36 OLD SHEDS (WALL & ROOF ROT, LEANING,
DISREPAIR)
i55 .[ ~?_7_i~--] WHIDBY I ~12X36 OLD SHEDS (WALL & ROOF ROT, LEANING,
DISREPAIR)
i232 315 i S
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
March 15, 1999
CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Braun called the special meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order at
SPECIAL MEETING: 4:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mayor Braun, Councilmembers Campbell [arrived at 4:40
p.m.], Doyle, Wiggins, and Williams.
Members ,4bsent: Councilmembers Hulett and McKeown.
Port Commissioners
Present: Commissioners Beckman, Foster, and Waud.
City Staff Present: Manager Ibarra, Attorney Knutson, Clerk Upton, B. Collins,
J. Piths, T. Smith, and P. Rasler.
Port Staff Present: Director Anderson, D. Hagiwara, K. Sweeney, B. James, P.
Deja, and P. Volk.
Public Present: No one signed the roster.
Mayor Braun opened the meeting by welcoming the Port Commissioners and indicating
the importance of developing a strong parmership between the two entities.
Commissioner Foster agreed with the importance of working together, as many citizens
are anxious to see something accomplished in the community.
Landfill - Wildlife Landfill - }Yildlife Management Plan: Manager Ibarra introduced Public Works &
Management Plan Utilities Director Piths who reviewed the status of the Landfill - Wildlife Management
Plan. The wildlife assessment was prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA), and the City was given a permit to continue operation of the landfill pursuant
to the adoption of the Wildlife Management Plan.
The draft plan will soon be reviewed with the USDA and, in conjunction with the plan,
an interlocal agreement between the City and the Port will soon be presented to the City
Council for consideration. The agreement establishes the formation of a committee
with Port, City, County, and Federal representation, charged with the responsibihty of
oversight of the plan. Chris Anderson, Executive Director of the Port, indicated the Port
has been cooperating with the City on this issue, as both entities stand to gain a great
deal by this cooperative effort. Discussion followed, and brief commentaries were
made with regard to the drainage at Lincoln Park and its direct impact on wildlife in the
area of the airport and the landfill.
Airport Road Relocation Airport RoadRelocation Project: Director Piths reported that the City has been in the
Project midst of acquiring property for the Airport Road relocation. The Transportation
Improvement Board (TIB) will be approached with a request for increased funding
which is mainly due to the increased costs for fight-of-way. Discussion ensued, and
Director Piths explained the specifics of the project, the planned access to the airport,
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
March 15, 1999
Airport Road Relocation and the improvements to the intersection. He noted that, once complete, this project
Project (Cont'd) will provide direct access from Highway 101 to the airport.
Storm Water Management Storm Water Management: Director Pittis explained storm water issues relative to
drainage from Lincoln Park to Big Boy Pond to Stevens School. In discussing the
details on this specific area, he noted that many of the problems of drainage have been
encountered by virtue of the rain experienced this year, as well as development of lands
to the south. The water from this drainage ultimately ends up in Tumwater Creek.
Discussion followed, and the merits of drainage from this area passing through the
airport were questioned. Also discussed were grant opportunities to resolve the
drainage problems. Another area of concern relates to the slope stabilization above
Marine Drive, and Director Pittis indicated the water flows down the bluff, also due to
development from the south.
On the matter of the Airport Industrial Park, the Port Commissioners expressed interest
in working with the City on a storm water management plan, which should address
future growth. Further, needed infrastructure at the Park is a matter of great concern,
and the Port urged further planning efforts in that regard which should include funding
possibilities.
Dave Hagiwara showed the group an aerial photo, describing the natural water drainage
in the area of the airport. Director Pittis indicated ponding would be a natural method
to collect the water; however, this cannot be a consideration in view of the water fowl
that would be assembled in the airport vicinity. Consideration must also be given to
how drainage plans affect the salmon habitat. It was realized by all concerned that the
matter of storm water is deserving of immediate attention in a joint partnership between
the City and the Port.
Infrastructure Development Infrastructure Development Needs: The next matter addressed in this joint meeting was
Needs the matter of needed infrastructure at the Airport Industrial Park. Chris Anderson cited
a study done on the area's needs and felt it might be appropriate to proceed to the next
phase of the project which would include more engineering. Dave Hagiwara indicated
there are various funding opportunities that might be available to either the City or the
Port, and a partnership might be advantageous in order to build the necessary
infrastructure. Port Commissioner Foster felt the only place in the short-term for the
development of jobs in Port Angeles would be at the Airport Industrial Park. By
consensus, the group agreed that efforts in this area should proceed as discussed. City
and Port staff members will plan to meet and formulate a strategy. It was pointed out
that the County might be a participant as well.
Marine Drive Slope Marine Drive Slope Stabilization: Discussion again focused on the Marine Drive slope
Stabilization stabilization, and Chris Anderson summarized discussions held between the Port, the
City, and various area landowners. Different landslides have occurred, and it is
apparent that the problem will not go away. Consideration has been given to various
possible means of at least lessening the degree that different properties are damaged by
the slides, and it was noted to be of great importance that a geotechnical study of the
entire area be conducted.
The Port placed emphasis on the need to get something done as quickly as possible,
particularly because the Port owns property as the base of the slope. In addition, it was
indicated that the County may be an interested property owner in these discussions.
Planning Director Collins reported on meetings held with property owners, at which
time discussion was held about having a geotechnical study conducted between
Tumwater and Hill Streets. Also at that time, discussion was held about the possibility
of the property owners providing financial assistance for the study. At this state, it is
unclear as to the necessary resolution for the problem, but it is certain to be quite
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
March 15, 1999
Marine Drive Slope expensive.
Stabilization (Cont'd)
In the ensuing discussion, a question was raised by Councilman Campbell as to whether
such a study would identify certain actions that could be taken in order to lessen the
likelihood of additional slides. Director Collins indicated he would hope the study
would include the kinds of action that could be taken, and he indicated the study should
be done in three to four months. Discussion followed as to the parties likely to
participate in the funding of this study, and Chris Anderson posed a question as to the
possibility of adding the costs of the study to a future LID. Attorney Knutson felt such
costs could be added to an LID.
Oak Street Development Oak Street Development: Manager Ibarra addressed the matter of Oak Street
development. A memorandum of understanding has been drafted to identify the
different roles of the City and Port, and there are two issues remaining to be considered:
a convention center still appears to be a possibility, and it must be agreed upon as to
which entity would maintain the site.
Commissioner Foster summarized the history of discussions relative to the property, and
Chris Anderson indicated the community has expressed the need for a convention
facility. Until the time other property might be identified for convention center
possibilities, she indicated she would not be comfortable pursuing other development
opportunities for the Oak Street property. Lengthy discussion ensued, and Councilman
Campbell noted that convention centers seldom break even, which often requires
subsidization to some extent. The group agreed there was a need to identify other
properties that might accommodate a convention center so that other options for the Oak
Street property could be considered.
Manager Ibarra suggested that a feasibility study for a convention center be conducted,
whether for the Oak Street property or elsewhere. Discussion also centered around the
timing of construction of the Multi-Modal Transportation Center, possible convention
center additions at the DoubleTree, as well as the involvement of the Downtown
Forward Executive Committee in the convention center discussions.
Rayonier Site Rayonier Site: Chris Anderson referenced the study conducted by Rayonier to
determine the highest and best use of the Rayonier site, and she distributed copies of a
document summarizing the study which was a matter of discussion at a Port
Commission work session. Ms. Anderson expressed the opinion that the future use of
the property should be directed toward industrial and warehousing uses. The Port has
been studying the possibility of barging for import and export business, and Ms.
Anderson noted how vital it is to protect the existing in-water structure. It is expected
to be more and more difficult to obtain approval for the futtire construction of piers
because of stringent environmental standards. In the discussion that followed, it was
noted that the Port and City are interested in the long-term use of the site, as opposed
to Rayonier's interest to pursue short-term and financially lucrative options.
Discussion was also held relative to the clean-up of the site and the group's desire to see
the State named in an oversight capacity.
Harbor Wood Waste Harbor Wood Waste: The Department of Ecology has issued a report that several points
in the Port Angeles Harbor have various degrees of wood waste and organic debris
present. Most of the debris is on the west end of the harbor, and the Port expressed
concern as relates to remediation, as many of the Port tenants involve wood handling
in the course of their business. Discussion was held as to the role of government in the
clean-up efforts, and Planning Director Collins felt the City's only role in the matter
would be in specific relation to the SEPA review or harbor line management. However,
Councilman Campbell pointed out that it would be helpful to have City representation
on any committee appointed, particularly because of potential economic impacts.
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
March 15, 1999
Update on Admiral Marine Update on Admiral Marine: Chris Anderson and Dave Hagiwara provided a status
report on Admiral Marine, noting that it appears the creditors are willing to work with
Admiral in a Chapter 11 reorganization. The potential timelines of the reorganization
were reviewed.
Claim for Damage to Port Claim for Damage to Port Pier: City and Port staff discussed damage to the Port's
Pier Terminal 2 pier in January of this past year. The City had hired a contractor to do
certain repairs to the City Pier; however, some of the camel logs broke loose and
damaged the Port pier. Both entities expressed a willingness to work together to resolve.
the issue.
Next Meeting Next Meeting: Everyone present agreed it is important to continue with this type of'
meeting in the future and to work together in the interest of the community.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m.
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk Gary Braun, Mayor
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
March 16, 1999
CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Braun called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order at
REGULAR MEETING: 5:31 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mayor Braun, Councilmembers Campbell, Doyle, Hulett,
McKeown, Wiggins and Williams.
Members Absent: None.
Staff Present: Manager Ibarra, Attorney Knutson, Deputy Clerk Hagar, B.
Becket, S. Brodhun, B. Collins, K. Godbey, S. Ilk, J. Pittis,
and D. Miller.
Public Present: L. Lee and P. Tietz.
PLEDGE OF The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by County Commissioner Carole
ALLEGIANCE: Boardman.
CEREMONIAL None.
MATTERS/
PROCLAMATIONS:
WORK SESSION: 1. Salmon Recovery - Report.from Brad Collins and Bob Martin
Meeting with Clallam Manager Ibarra stated the purpose of this meeting was to discuss issues with
County Commissioners commonalities to both the City and County. It was not expected issues would be
resolved, but this was an opportunity to apprise one another of concerns and plans.
Salmon Recovery
Manager Ibarra stated the first topic of discussion would be salmon recovery. He
introduced Brad Collins, Port Angeles Planning Director, who gave a briefing from the
City's prospective. Director Collins stated staff had been working with the County,
both Tribes, and the Agnew Irrigation District on watershed planning, as well as fish
restoration project planning. This effort has been successful, and the jurisdictions are
working well together.
Today, the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon was added as a threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act. This affects the Elwha and Dungeness Rivers, Morse Creek
watershed basin, and the Jimmy Come Lately Creek. The Federal Government, through
the State, provides funding for the Tribes and County, but not for the City. It is hoped
this will change as the impacts on cities become more obvious. Councilman Hulett
asked what impact this would have on the streams and creeks located within the City
limits, and Director Collins responded that they are not directly related to Chinook
Salmon at this point. The focus is on the Elwha, because it is the City's water supply.
Director Collins introduced Bob Martin, Clallam County Director of Community
Development. Mr. Martin said the new endangered species listings came out today, and
27
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 16, 1999
Meeting with Clallam they do affect the County's regulatory process and will likely affect the City's as well.
County Commissioners The new listings also designated critical habitat, which has not been included in the
(Cont'd) past. Critical habitat areas are defined as the area within 200' of the streams in which
salmon currently reside or have access. County staffis currently attempting to map out
Salmon Recovery these areas, upon which habitat management plans must be established. The critical
(Cont'd) habitat also includes the coastal areas of the Strait of Juan deFuca up to Crescent Bay,
which would probably include the Port Angeles harbor.
Director Collins felt the federal implementation of the listing would not go into affect
for two to three months, as it first must be published and then followed by a sixty-day
comment period. Mr. Martin felt there was additional pressure on the County due to
designation of critical habitats.
Discussion followed, and Director Collins and Mr. Martin responded to questions and
provided clarification. Explanations were given on development and permitting under
the 4-D role for critical areas. Mr. Martin explained the County's requirements
regarding habitat management plans, and Director Collins stated that the City did not
currently have habitat management plans.
Commissioner Doherty stated that each entity, City, County, and Tribe, had knowledge
and/or experience the others did not have. It is hoped, that by working together,
solutions can be worked out to benefit all those affected by the Endangered Species Act.
Mayor Braun concurred and hoped tonight's meeting would help generate an
atmosphere of cooperation.
Solid Waste & Landfill 2. Solid Waste and Landfill - Report from Jack Pittis and Steve Hauff
Public Works Director Pittis reminded the Council that the City had received a permit
from the County Health Department and acknowledged the difficulties entailed in that
process due to the new roles regarding landfills. Eventually, all landfills west of the
Cascades will be eliminated, and other methods of disposal will be sought.
In order to obtain the landfill permit, the City hired the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) to render a wildlife assessment and to perform wildlife hazing at the landfill
and airport. The USDA has also prepared a Wildlife Management Plan which is
currently being finalized prior to being sent to the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) for
review. Upon completion, an interlocal agreement involving the Port and City will be
presented for the implementation of the plan to assure the best wildlife management.
The Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) has been promised that a decision on
how long the City feels the landfill can be operated economically will be forthcoming.
The SWAC will then begin discussions as to where and how solid waste will be
disposed. Director Pittis then introduced Steve Hauff, Clallam County Engineer.
Steve Hauff agreed that the major issue is what to do with the 40,000 tons of solid waste
that currently comes into the City's landfill once that facihty closes. The SWAC will
have to make these decisions and arrive at a recommendation for the signatories to the
Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. These signatories currently include the
cities of Port Angeles, Forks, Sequim, the Makah, Quileute, Lower Elwha and
Jamestown Tribes, Olympic National Park and Clallam County.
Mr. Hauff stated that solid waste in the County is significantly different from the City,
as the County has private collectors and no mandatory collection. The County has two
transfer stations operated by private contractors, one of which delivers the solid waste
to the Port Angeles Landfill. It is believed that, in the future, a transfer station or
disposal site will be utilized. Some of the future decisions will be economic and some
will be regulatory. In five years time, solid waste issues will be completely different
CITY COUNCIL IVlF~EIING
March 16, 1999
Meeting with Clallam than they are today. Director Pittis then reviewed the issues that would need to be
County Commissioners covered by a Solid Waste Comprehensive Plan. Discussion ensued, and Director Pittis
(Cont'd) and Mr. Hauff responded to questions and provided additional clarification.
Solid Waste & Landfill 3. Opportunity Fund - Report from Jim Rumpeltes
(Cont'd)
Manager Ibarra reminded the Council that this Fund was created by a sales tax rebate
Opportunity Fund provided through the State. Currently, there is approximately $250,000 in this fund,
and discussions were held in the summer and fall regarding distribution of the monies.
A proposal was accepted, and Jim Rumpeltes intended to give an update on the issue
this evening, unfortunately, he was unable to be present. Bob Martin, Clallam County
Director of Community Development, stated eligibility issues and requirements were
currently being established. County Commissioner Doherty stated that SB 5594
increased this fund and explained that the wording of the Bill liberalizes the City's
influence on the Fund.
Commissioner Ireland stated that the goal is to be ready to take applications in May, and
it is estimated the fund amount will be $270,000 per year. Commissioner Ireland felt
all government entities would be qualified to apply, and there would be a review board
of professionals to make recommendations to the Board of Commissioners who would
make the final role. She stated staff is currently working toward a draft ordinance. A
hearing would then be scheduled.
Discussion followed, and further clarification was provided. Manager Ibarra stated he
thought the largest city in the County needed to approve of how this Fund was set up.
He will double check on this.
Councilman Wiggins reminded everyone that at the end of the month the Forest
Practices Board has a hearing scheduled. Timber industry people have been working
for about two years to come to some agreement as to what will happen on their property
so they can practice forestry in an economic way. Councilman Wiggins stated the
County has just as much at stake as the City, if not more.
Future Meetings 4. Future Meetings - Discussion regarding Scheduling of Subsequent Meetings
Manager Ibarra asked the Council and Commissioners how often they would like to
meet. After some discussion, it was decided to hold a joint work session at the regular
Council meeting of September 21, 1999. Also, meetings will be called as issues arise
which need mutual discussion. Mayor Braun thanked the County Commissioners and
staff members for taking the time to participate in this evenings discussions.
Break Mayor Braun recessed the meeting for a break at 6:50 p.m. The meeting reconvened
at 7:00 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - Municipal Code Amendment - MCA 99-01 - Clallam County Housing Authority - To
OTHER: allow public housing authority offices and maintenance facilities in the RS-7,
Residential Single Family, zone by conditional use permit
Municipal Code
Amendment Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Planning Department. At
Ordinance No.3013 Mayor Braun's request, Director Collins provided additional input and clarification and
responded to questions posed by the Council.
Mayor Braun opened the public hearing at 7:07 p.m.
Pamela Tietz, Executive Director of the Housing Authority, 1311 W. 9* Street, spoke
in support of the Code amendment. Ms. Tietz did ask the Council to consider removing
the word "existing" from section 17.10.040 M. of the draft ordinance. It is important
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 16, 1999
PUBLIC HEARINGS - to have on site services to the residents in public housing and it is the only way to make
OTHER: the units successful.
(Cont'd)
Mayor Braun asked Attorney Knutson if there would be a problem with removing the
Municipal Code word from the Ordinance. Attorney Knutson responded negatively, but asked Director
Amendment Collins how the Planning Commission viewed the significance of that word. Director
Ordinance No.3013 Collins felt the word was redundant and could prevent the Housing Authority from
(Cont'd) putting office facilities in at new project sites. He felt it was consistent to eliminate the
word.
There was no further testimony and Mayor Braun closed the public hearing at 7:12 p.m.
and read the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 3013
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles amending
the Port Angeles Zoning Code to allow public housing
authority offices and maintenance facilities in the RS-7,
Residential Single Family zone by conditional use
permit and amending Ordinance 1709 as amended
and Chapter 17.10 of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code.
Couneilmember MeKeown moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title, citing
Findings 1 - 4 and Conclusions 1 - 5, as set forth in Exhibit "A' which is attached
to and becomes a part of these minutes, and deleting the word "existing" from the
body of the Ordinance. Councilman Williams seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Councilman Wiggins requested the Council be given a tour of the Lee Hotel, which will
be conducted on March 25, 1999, at 3:00 p.m. Councilmember McKeown asked if a
name has been chosen yet for this facility. Ms. Tietz stated a "Name the Lee Hotel"
contest was conducted at the KONP Home Show; however, a name has not yet been
chosen.
LATE ITEMS TO BE Councilman Hulett asked if the Council should draft a letter to the Governor and
PLACED ON THIS OR Representatives regarding reopening Highway 101 as soon as possible. Councilman
FUTURE AGENDA: Doyle stated that, according to a news report this evening, helicopters are removing logs
from the site and four days without rain will be necessary to really get the job done.
Hopefully, one lane will be opened within the next few days.
ADJOURN TO Mayor Braun adjourned the meeting to Executive Session at 7:20 p.m. to discuss a
EXECUTIVE SESSION: matter of labor negotiations for approximately one hour.
RETURN TO The meeting returned to open session at 8:23 p.m.
OPEN SESSION:
FINANCE: Final Acceptance and Payment for Fire Station Canopy
Final Acceptance and Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department.
Payment for Fire Station Director Pittis noted that the amount in the original and f'mal contracts is the same, and
Canopy he indicated the contractor did a good job.
Councilman Wiggins moved to accept the project and authorize final payment of
$9,108.28 to Hanna Construction and authorize release of the total retainage of
$1,359.28, upon receipt of clearances from the Departments of Revenue and Labor
& Industries. Councilman Doyle seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
CITY COUNCIL Mg~g3'ING
March 16, 1999
CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember MeKeown moved to accept the Consent Agenda, including: 1) City
Council minutes - February 22 and March 2, 1999; 2) Check list - $857,489.12 - March
5, 1999; 3) Interlocal Purchasing Agreement with the PUD. Councilman Williams
seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
CITY COUNCIL Councilman Wiggins attended the National League of Cities Conference which he felt
COMMITTEE was worthwhile and well done. He again reminded the Council that the Forest Practices
REPORTS: Board will hold a hearing the end of this month. It is an extremely important measure
for this City and the surrounding area to maintain a flow of wood. The allowable
National League of Cities harvest will be reduced on private land, and it is important for the City Council to speak
Conference to this issue.
City Vehicle Inspection Councilman Doyle, along with Councilman Hulett and Manager Ibarra and several
department heads, performed a vehicle inspection of the equipment which has been
targeted for replacement this year. Councilman Doyle also attended a Utility Advisory
Committee meeting and the National League of Cities Conference. Councilman Doyle
asked Manager Ibarra for an update on the madrona tree issue.
Madrona Tree Manager Ibarra reminded the Council the City had been asked to accept the donation
of a madrona tree from Ms. Serr, an out-of-state property owner. After talking to
Council members and the Real Estate Committee, the decision was made to decline
acceptance of the tree. He explained to Ms. Serf that the Real Estate Committee was
examining all City properties and wasn't in a position to accept more property,
especially that which would require extensive maintenance.
Councilman Doyle stated he also attended the National League of Cities Conference and
had the opportunity to meet with aides of Patty Murray and Slade Gorton.
Downtown Waterfront Councilman Williams attended the Science, Technology and Manufacturing Association
Area Open House, where a plan for the downtown waterfront area was unveiled. Councilman
Williams felt it would behoove the City to listen to the proposal some time in the future.
Councilman Hulett attended the vehicle and equipment inspection. He noted that
vehicle replacement is on tonight's agenda.
Discussions with Councilman Campbell attended the National League of Cities Conference in
Congressional Delegation Washington, D.C. He echoed the comments of Councilmembers Wiggins and Doyle
re. Elwha Dams and felt it was helpful in getting a national perspective on current issues. Federal pre-
emption of local authority was discussed in regards to taxation and land usc.
Councilman Campbell stated that in talking to Congressman Dicks he learned that the
administration's current position was to not acquire the Elwha Dams, unless full
funding for the removal of the lower dam was available. The Senator and Congressman
would like to see this resolved by September 30, 1999.
United Way Allocation Councilmember McKeown stated the United Way Allocation Committee is in need of
Committee volunteers to join the committee, anyone interested, please contact her. Councilmember
McKeown attended a meeting regarding the City's role in the salmon issues. All the
cities were concerned about water rights and unfunded mandates. It was a very
productive meeting. Councilman Doyle asked Councilmember McKeown for an update
Downtown Forward on Downtown Forward. Councilmember McKeown stated she had met with Jim
Haguewood, Vice Chair, to discuss strategies for the next few meetings. Discussions
will be held with Manager Ibarra and staff as to how Downtown Forward can be a
participant in the design of the Gateway Project.
Mayor Braun attended a ribbon cutting for the Port's new building at Fairchild
Eastern Boundary of Industrial Park. Mayor Braun noted a letter had been received from Norbert and
UGA Michelle Juhasz asking for a review and change to the eastern boundary for the UGA.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 16, 1999
CITY COUNCIL Planning Director Collins stated this review and amendment will take place in June. At
COMMITTEE Council's request, Director Collins will respond to the letter.
REPORTS: (Cont'd)
Mayor Braun noted that in the magazine section of the Sunday paper, Port Angeles was
listed as number six of the ten best small cities.
Changes to Nuisance Ordinances Not Requiring Public Hearings
Ordinance
Ordinance No. 3014 1. Revisions to Nuisance and dunk Vehicle Ordinance
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the City Attorney's office.
Attorney Knutson reviewed the five changes made to the Ordinance and responded to
questions posed by the Council.
Mayor Braun read the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 3014
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, revising the nuisance and junk
vehicle enforcement procedures and amending
Ordinances 2469 and 2698, as amended, and
Chapters 8.04 and 8.05 of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code.
Councilman Wiggins moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. Councilman
Campbell seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Moving of Buildings 2. Revisions to Ordinance Regulating Moving of Buildings
Ordinance No. 3015
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department.
Attorney Knutson explained the delay in returning this ordinance to the Council. The
business that performs house moving in Port Angeles had a concern over the insurance
requirement of the Ordinance. Referring to page 58 of the packet, Attorney Knutson
explained that requiring $2 million in coverage for all claims would cost the building
mover an additional $4,000 in insurance premiums. In the past five years, there has
been an average of one house moved per year. It is believed that $1 million is adequate
coverage, and staffrecommends changing section 14.32.070 A. 3., the last sentence, to
read "....in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence."
Mayor Braun read the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 3015
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, regulating the moving of buildings,
repealing Ordinance 1766 as amended, and
codifying this Ordinance as Chapter 14.32 of
the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
Councilman Williams moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title, citing the
change recommended by the City Attorney. Councilman Doyle seconded the
motion. Following brief discussion, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Resolutions Not Requiring Public Hearings: None
CITY COLrNCIL MEETING
March 16, 1999
Equipment Replacement Other Considerations
1. Recommendations on Equipment Replacement
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department.
Director Pittis thanked the Council members that participated in the vehicle and
equipment inspection. He reviewed the expenditure of funds for vehicle replacement,
as well as the list of equipment to be replaced, what it would be replaced with, purchase
method, and estimated prices. Discussion followed, and staff responded to questions
and provided additional clarification.
Councilman Hulett asked if three plows at $13,000 each was a necessity based on the
amount of snowfall this year. He suggested one plow this year and one plow next year
might make for better strategy. This would allow for the plow to be evaluated before
two more are purchased. Councilman Doyle stated he has observed Rainbow Sweepers
move a lot of snow with a hydraulic plow rather than a V-plow. Some parts of town
receive more snow than others. The plows should last a long time, and he felt it was a
good investment. Director Pittis explained why he felt the purchase of the three plows
was cost efficient, as they are used on smaller vehicles. Manager Ibarra stated using a
pick up truck to plow would allow staff to address residential streets much faster while,
at the same time, the larger trucks could address the major thoroughfares, thereby
allowing for more flexibility in dealing with snow and ice.
Referring to Item K on page 69, Manager Ibarra asked that the ultimate disposition of
this track be deferred to a future meeting. Director Brodhun is preparing a report as to
the possible use of this truck by the Parks & Recreation Department rather than using
it as a trade-in.
Following further discussion, Councilman Doyle moved to concur with the purchase
of the 14 pieces of equipment contained in the proposed list and the 1999 budget,
but changing the plows listed from Myers 8' to the Boss "V" plow for the added
amount as stated in the memo. Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion,
which carried unanimously.
Interlocal Agreement with 2. Extension of Jefferson County Landfill Interlocal Agreement
Jefferson County
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department.
Director Pittis reviewed the background information on the issue. Councilman Doyle
noted that the Utility Advisory Committee did discuss raising the rates for the extension,
but decided against it in the interest of cooperation.
Councilman Campbell moved to amend the agreement with Jefferson County
allowing them to transport solid waste to the Port Angeles Landfill until April 29,
1999. Councilman Williams seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Draft Letter to 3. Draft Letter to Congressional Delegation re: Tax Free Bonds
Congressional Delegation
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department and
asked Director Pittis for additional input and clarification, which he provided. Director
Pittis stated this issue was discussed at length by the Utility Advisory Committee, and
the letter will request the delegation to help protect the City's tax exempt status,
especially as regards the electrical utility.
Councilmember McKeown moved to approve sending a letter to the City's
congressional delegation supporting H.R. 721 and S. 386 and opposing proposals
to tax the revenues of state and local government. Councilman Campbell seconded
the motion, which carried unanimously.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 16, 1999
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None.
QUASI-JUDICIAL:
INFORMATION: An invoice has been received from Delhur for the repairs it has effected. A price
breakdown will be presented at the next Council meeting, but the cost was
Status on Recent Storm approximately $99,000.
Damage
Employee Breakfast The next City Employee Breakfast will be held Friday, March 19, 1999, at 7:00 a.m.
Temporapy Administrative Phyllis Tapp has been hired as a temporary to provide administrative support during
Assistant Sam's vacation. Manager Ibarra invited Council to stop in and meet her.
Letter from Robert Manager Ibarra noted he had distributed to Council a draft letter to Mr. Bronsink
Bronsink regarding a land-use variance issue. He asked that any comments be directed to his
office as soon as possible so a response can be sent out to Mr. Bronsink.
Carnegie Library It is hoped that restoration of the Carnegie Library facade will begin next week.
Retirement Tom Schiederdmayer is retiring from the Fire Department effective April 6, 1999, after
21 years of service.
DNR ALEA Grant Scott Brodhun, Director of Parks & Recreation, stated a lot of community effort has
gone into fund raising for the Valley Creek Estuary Project. However, the City has now
been notified it will receive a $75,000 grant from the Dept. of Natural Resources
Aquatic Land Enhancements Account program. The funds can be used as the City's
match for this project.
Penney's Building Mayor Braun asked for a brief update on the disposition of the old Penney's building.
Director Pittis stated the project owner has changed contractors and is in the process of
relicensing a worker for the project. Some piling has been uncovered that was rotten,
so it will be a difficult and time-consuming project due to conditions.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:34 p.m.
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk Gary Braun, Mayor
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jack Pittis, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT: Wholesale Water Agreement with the PUD
Issue.' The City has a wholesale water agreement to sell water to Clallam County Public Utility
District No. 1 which expires on August 28, 1999 and needs to be extended.
Recommendation: City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the extension of the wholesale
water agreement with the PUD with the same terms and conditions to December 31, 1999.
Summary.: The wholesale water agreement with Clallam County Public Utility District No. 1
expires on August 28, 1999. Over the last few years, the agreement has been extended on a year by
year basis due to many factors involving the relationship between the two entities. An extension to
December 31, 1999 will allow the City sufficient time to conduct a cost of service and to implement
any resulting rate adjustments during periods of lower consumption.
Background / Analysis: Last August, the City and Clallam County Public Utility District No. 1
extended the wholesale water agreement until August 28, 1999. The two parties have agreed to
extensions on a year to year basis because there are many factors that remain unresolved with regard
to water supplies, location and funding of a new reservoir and others. City staff and Council member
Orville Campbell and PUD staff and Commissioner Ted Simpson have been meeting monthly to
discuss various ways that the City and PUD can cooperate together to the mutual benefit of our
respective ratepayers.
An extension of the wholesale water agreement to the end of 1999 is recommended to allow time
for the city's Finance Department to conduct a cost of service study for the water utility. The results
of the study may not be know in time to incorporate them in an extension by August 1999. A copy
of the current agreement is attached for reference. The Utility Advisory Committee has reviewed
and recommends approval of the extension of the Wholesale Water Agreement with the PUD.
Attach: Wholesale Water Agreement
G:\EXCHANGE\CNCLPKT~PUBWKS\CC-PUD.499
35
AMENDMENT TO
WHOLESALE WATER CONTRACT
This amendment to the Wholesale Water Contract dated January 9, 1995, is made and entered
into by and between the City of Port Angeles, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "City",
and the Public Utility District No. 1 of Clallam County, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the
"District."
Whereas, the City and the District are parties to a wholesale water contract, which was
originally in effect until January 9, 1998, and was subsequently extended by a contract amendment to
August 23, 1999; and
Whereas, the City and the District have agreed to extend the wholesale water contract through
December 31, 1999;
Now, Therefore, the City and the District hereby agree that the Wholesale Water Contract dated
January 9, 1995, shall be amended as follows:
1. Paragraph 4. Termination is hereby amended to read as follows:
This contract shall terminate on December 31, 1999, or upon 60 days written notice by either
party, whichever is earlier.
DATED this day of April, 1999.
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1
CITY OF PORT ANGELES OF CLALLAM COUNTY
Gary Braun, Mayor President
ATTEST: ATTEST:
Becky Upton, City Clerk Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
A:~PUD.CON
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jack Pittis, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT: Addendum to Library Architect's Agreement
Issue: Additional costs related to architectural work for the completion of the library have occurred
that were not anticipated in the original agreement or subsequent amendments to that agreement.
Recommendation:Authorize the Mayor to execute Addendum #5 for the design of the library
in the amount of $3,892.92
Summar.v: Additional architectural work related to the library completion was generated to
coordinate some of the finishing touches and an increase in the fees to be paid to the architect is
appropriate.
Background/Analysis: The City Council has previously approved four addendums to the
agreement for the design and construction management of the new library. The first two addendums
involved increased costs in survey work to deal with the permits and to include the two additional
lots purchased by NOLS and the third involved changes that were made in the design when the
architect was requested to revise the design so as to incorporate comments received from the public
during a public meeting. The fourth addendum compensated the architect for changes requested in
the design of the interiors, the cost of a review of the interior design relative to indoor air quality not
in the original scope, an electrical design change and an increase in the allowable reimbursable
resulting from the time extension of the work and change in the deposit approach for plans and
specifications.
This fifth addendum is to address the additional work to coordinate the time capsule on the front of
the building, increase the signage in the building and coordination of lighting for the Friends
Artwork and around the dedication and donor plaques.
These changes revise the maximum compensation allowed from $397,307.15 to $401,200.07
[$3,892.92 increase in this addendum] as shown on the architect's fees explanation attached. These
increases have been discussed and approved by the NOLS Board, except that the increase requested
for the Japanese Garden work was not allowed. All funds for this increase come from the NOLS
Board, consistent with the City's agreement, as the bond proceeds are exceeded by the cost of the
project and the $520 for lighting coordination for the Friends Artwork will be reimbursed by the
Friends.
Attachments: Addendum #5 and support sheets
G:\EXCHANGE\CNCLPKT\PUBWKS\CCADD#5.499 37
ADDENDUM NO. 5
TO
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN THE
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
and
ROBERT NIXON ASSOCIATES, INC.
RELATING TO: Design and construction services for the Port Angeles Library
THIS ADDENDUM NO. 5 to the above referenced agreement is made and entered into this ~ day of ,1999,
by and between the CITY OF PORT ANGELES, a non-charter code city of the State of Washington (hereinafter called the "CITY"),
and Robert Nixon Associates, Inc., a Washington Corporation (hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT").
WHEREAS, the original agreement and addendums did not include the costs to address the additional work on the time capsule,
increased signage for the building, a Japanese Garden Project, coordination of artwork lighting, and Dedication and Donor Plaques;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above representations and the mutual agreements set forth herein, the original
agreement between the parties shall be amended as follows:
1. Section I SCOPE OF WORK and Exhibit "A" shall be amended by including work on the time capsule, increased signage for the
building, a Japanese Garden Project, coordination of artwork lighting, and Dedication and Donor Plaques.
2. Section VI MAXIMUM COMPENSATION from $397,307.15 to $401,200.07. Exhibit "B' shall be amended by increasing the
interiors design, electrical design compensation, architect's fees and reimbursables as denoted below:
I Architect's Fee [Construction Administration Increase]
la. Japanese Garden $601.25 [not approved]
lb Dedication Plaques and Donor Wall [completed] $1,511.25
lc Dedication Plaques and Donor Wall [estimated to be done] $390.00
1 d Coordination with lighting for donor plaque and artwork [raimb. by Friends] $520.00
le Time Capsule $406.25
If Building Sign and Interior Signage $3,298.75
1 g Donation of time against item If above [$2,2'33.33]
TOTAL INCREASE THIS ADDENDUM $3,892.92
In WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES CONSULTANT
MAYOR
TITLE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
CRAIG D. KNUTSON, CITY ATTORNEY BECKY UPTON, CITY CLERK
FileN:~J:)ROJECTS~4-1gLIB~CONSULT~AGREEMT~DDEND~5.WPD
38
ADDITIONAL SERVICES FOR PORT ANGEI,ES PUBLIC I,IRRARY PROJECT
Dat, e Hours Task
JAPANESE GARDEN
07/15/97 1.0 Mtg.
11/10/97 .75 Mtg. w/ Sally & Friends
01/14/98 3.0 Proposed Design
01 /14/98 1.0 Letter
01/20/98 1.0 Mtg.
06/10/98 1.0 Mtg. w/Friends
06/11/98 1.5
9.5 hrs x 65.00/hr $601.25
DEDICATION PLAQUES & DONOR WALL
03/26/98 4.75 Draffing
05/05/98 .5 Revise Drawings
06/12/98 1.0 Plaque Drawings
06/15/98 3.0 Further Revisions
06/16/98 .5 Fax & Order
06/17/98 .75 Phone Time w/ARK Ramos
06118/98 .5 Phone w/ARK Ramos
07/15/95 1.0 Shop drawing review
07/23/98 2.0 Shop drawing review
09/15/98 1.5 Revise Donor Drawings
10/06/98 2.0 Revise Donor Drawings
11/05/98 .25 ARK Ramos Coord.
11/06/98 1.0 Plaques Arrive
11/10/98 3.0 Inspect & Revise Drawings
11/12/98 .5 Revision Drawings (cont.)
12/01/98 1.0 Bliemiester Coord.
23.25 hrs x 65.00/hr$1,511.25'
* This task not yet complete. Estimate additional 6 hrsfor coordination w/Bliemister, site, & shop
drawings, and installation coordination. Figure an additional $390.00.
Estimate additional 12hrs for Coordination with Lighting Designer and Electrical Contractor for Donor
Plaque and Seven Pillars ,4rtwork as requested by the Friends of the Library.
Figure an additional $520.00.
TIME CAPSULE
39
01103198 1.25 Design & Site Visit
03/06/98 1.5 Redesign
06/12/98 .5 Stone
08/05/98 2.0 Meeting w/Undertakers
08/17/98 1.0 Broken Stone
6.25hfs x 65.00/hr $406.25
BUILDING SIGN & INTERIOR SIGNAGE
05/20/98 2.5 Design
05/21/98 1.0 " "
06/03/98 1.25 " "
06/04/98 .5 " "
06/10/98 1.0 " "
06/15198 2.0 Steering Committee Meeting
06/15/98 1.5 Redesign
07/01/98 1.5 Sign Permit
07/07/98 1.5 " "
08/11/98 .5 Plot Drawings
08/13/98 1.0 Locate Sign on Site
08/17/98 1.0 Lighting for sign
08/18/98 .5 " "
09/14/98 .5 On Site
09129198 .5 Interior Signage w/Larry
09/30/98 1.0 " "
10/01/98 3.5 " "
10/02/98 .5 ARK Ramos
I0/13/98 1.0 On Site w/Larry
I 0/14/98 .5 " "
10/14/98 3.5 Lighting
26.75hfs x 65.00/hr $1,738.75
*This task notyet complete estimate additional 12-24 hrs to complete lobby lettering or full building
signage as discussed w/Susan. Could be as high as $1,560.00.
Estimation $3,298.73
40
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jack Pittis, Public Works & Utilities Director
S~JBJEC~r: Municipal Code Amendment - Electrical Code
Issue: Amend the Port Angeles Municipal Code to allow updated electrical devices to be installed
and to delete the requirement for disconnect devices on the outside of buildings.
Recommendation: Approve three changes to PAMC Section 14.05.160, Wiring Methods, as
shown in the attached ordinance.
Snmmar~ New wiring methods are now available that will improve service to the City's utility
customers and save installation costs. The practice of requiring outside disconnects has caused more
problems for utility customers than it has saved time for City personnel.
Background/Analysis: The attached ordinance requests three changes to the City's Electrical Code:
1) The current code allows the use of only an approved raceway in the Downtown and Fire Zone
1 areas. A one-hour fire wall rated cable is now available and can be used to provide power to
buildings that do not have a fire-wall separation. It is recommended that the rated cable be allowed
and an approved alternative to raceways in section 14.05.160(A).
2) In 1993 section 14.05.160(H) was added to the Electrical Code requiring certain customers (on
current transformers and 480 volt services) to provide a disconnect on the outside of their buildings
in an attempt to make disconnecting electrical service less time consuming by City Light personnel
for fire disconnects, routine tum-0ff and for non-payment. Since adoption of this section, staff has
discovered that in most cases the services are for commercial customers and seldom require a shut-
off and providing a disconnect on the outside of buildings increases the cost of construction by a
substantial amount, especially when the service is of high ampacity. Disconnects installed on the
outside of buildings are also an attraction subject to vandalism. Several customers have had their
power shut off by vandals and then have had the switches altered so that they can be locked in the
"on" position thereby violating the U.L. listing of the device. It is recommended that this section
be deleted by adoption of the ordinance.
3) Electric panels with an internal switch that allow connection to a generator are now an industry
standard and have been certified by Underwriters Laboratories. It is no longer necessary to require
a separate device and section 14.05.160(I) should be deleted by adoption of the ordinance.
Attach: Ordinance G :\EXC HANG E\CNCLPKTXPUB WKS\C CLTCODE.499
41
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, amending the
electrical code ordinance to allow certain updated electrical devices to
be installed and to delete the requirements for disconnect devices on the
outside of buildings and separate transfer switch devices for generator
connections and amending Ordinance 2552 as amended and Chapter
14.05 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Ordinance 2552 as amended and Chapter 14.05 of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code are hereby amended by amending PAMC 14.05.160 to read as follows:
14.05.160 Wiring Methods.
A. All buildings in the Downtown, Fire Zone 1 as defined in Chapter 14.24
PAMC, and any open space mall-type structures without fire wall separation, industrial zoned
property, piers, docks, wharfs, structures over water, and permanent structures at the Clallam
County fairgrounds, shall be wired in an approved raceway, or with MC cable (1 hour minimum
fixv_mll_mi .
B. All mains and circuits exceeding 300 volts between conductors, and circuits
exceeding 150 volts to ground, shall be installed in approved raceways.
C. The fault duty rating of all service equipment shall exceed the available fault
current. The minimum fault duty rating required on service equipment for non-dwelling
installations shall be at least 20,000 AIC.
D. Wood used for support or other purposes in electrical installations, in contact
with the earth or subject to moisture, shall be commercially pressure treated and labeled for earth
contact.
E. Electric meters shall not be permitted inside buildings or within carports or
porches without written approval of the Inspector. If an electric meter is made inaccessible, such
as by the installation of a fence (with a locked gate or not gate) or other enclosure, the owner shall
relocate the meter to an accessible location, as determined by the Inspector. if the electric meter
is located behind a locked gate, the owner may provide an approved lock box rather than
relocating the electric meter.
-1-
42
F. Where more than one electric meter is used, a permanem label shall be attached
on each meter base showing the apartment or unit number.
G. In Residential Occupancies, 20 amp branch circuits will be limited to 20 outlets
and/or lighting devices and 15 amp circuits will be limited to 15 devices.
Section 2 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fiYe days after the date of
publication.
?ASSED by the City Council of the City of Po~t Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the __ day of ,1999.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary
99.03
-2-
44
poR
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jack Pittis, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT: Public Works Trust Fund Applications
Issue: The reconstruction of 8th Street (Race to "C" Street) and the covering of Black Diamond and
Peabody Heights Reservoirs are eligible for loan funding through the Public Works Trust Fund
programs and approval for submittal of the applications is requested.
Recommendation: The City Council approve the submittal of loan applications for the
reconstruction of 8th Street and covering of the Black Diamond and Peabody Heights
reservoirs and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached Applicant Certification.
Summary.: The Capital Facility Plan includes projects for the reconstruction of 8th Street and
covering of the Black Diamond and Peabody Heights Reservoirs. These projects are eligible for loan
funding through programs offered by the Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF). The loans would be
for a term of 20 years at low interest (no higher than 1% with a 30% local match) and are subject to
a competitive process.
Back?ound/Analysis: On March 21, 1998 the City Council approved the submittal of loan
applications for the 8th Street reconstruction and covering of the reservoirs to PWTF. The
applications were rated during the 1998 round of loan reviews, but did not make the eligible list of
loan awards. Those applications have been revised to reflect current conditions and input from
PWTF staff to improve the requests. Public Works staff is confident that the applications have an
increased likelihood of stronger consideration during the upcoming process.
The local match required for a PWTF loan is a minimum of 10% per project. If successful, the term
of the awarded loans would be for 20 years re-paid from the General and Street Fund (8th Street
Project) and the Water Fund (the reservoir projects). The 8th Street Reconstruction project is
positioned for more favorable review as the City was able to secure the PWTF design loan funding
during the end of 1998.
45
MAYOR BP&UN AND CITY COUNCIL
Public Works Trust Fund Applications
Page 2
The current project estimates for the two separate loan applications are:
a) 8th Street Reconstruction less design loan $3,000,000-$250,000= $2,750,000
b) Cover Black Diamond Reservoir $ 736,000
Black Diamond Disinfection $ 120,000
Cover Peabody Heights Reservoir $ 405,000
Jones Reservoir Cover (using City funds)
Total $1,470,000
The City has received approval for the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loan ($463,500 at 5%
over 20 years) from the Department of Health which will, combined with City funds for Jones
Reservoir Cover, be used for the 30% match on the total project amount. The total amount of the
PWTF reservoir cover loan application will be $1,006,500.
Attachment: Applicant Certification
G:\EXCHANGE\CNCLPKT~PUBWKS\PWTF-CC.499
MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
Public Works Trust Fund Applications
Page 2 [Revised]
The current project estimates for the two separate loan applications are: The below figures have been
revised in order to coordinate with the final calculations for the application after the final
adjustments for matching ratios and project costs. We appologize for any confusion in getting the
final number to Council.
a) 8th Street Reconstruction less design loan $3,000,000-$250,000= $2,750,000
b) Cover Black Diamond Reservoir $ 736,000
Black Diamond Disinfection $ 120,000
Cover Peabody Heights Reservoir $ 405,000
Jones Reservoir Cover (using City funds) $ 209,000 $408,000
Total $1,470,000 $1,669,000
The City has received approval for the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loan ($463,500 at 5%
over 20 years) from the Department of Health which will, combined with City funds for Jones
Reservoir Cover, be used for the 30% match on the total project amount. The total amount of the
PWTF reservoir cover loan application will be $I,006,500 $1,168,300 (70% of total) and will
require additional $37, 200 cash from the water fund to balance revenues for project.
Attachment: Applicant Certification
G:XEXCHANOE~NCLP~WKSkPWTF-CC.499
PART D
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
WHEREAS, , is applying to the Washington State Public Works Trust Fund
program for a low-interest loan for an eligible project; and
WHEREAS, RCW 43.155.070 requires that applicants planning under RCW 36.70A.040 must have adopted ·
comprehensive plans in conformance with the requirements of chapter 36.70A RCW, and must have adopted
development regulations in conformance with the requirements of chapter 36.70A RCW; and
WHEREAS,. RCW 70.95 requires a comprehensive Solid Waste Management plan adopted by the city or county; and
WHEREAS, RCW 43.155.070 requires that county and city applicants must have adopted the local optional one-quarter
of one percent Real Estate Excise Tax, as described in Chapter 82.46 RCW; and
WHEREAS, the local governing body has approved submission of this application for a Public Works Trust Fund loan;
and
WHEREAS, it is recognized and acknowledged that the entire application packet consists of Part.A, Part B, Part C,
Part D, Part E and Attachments, all of which contain policy and procedural information applicable to the program.
Only Part D need be returned for review by the Public Works Board; and
WHEREAS, the applicant recognizes and acknowledges that the information in Part D is the only information which
will be considered in the evaluation and rating process. Incomplete responses will result in a reduced chance of funding.
In order to ensure fairness for all, the Public Works Board does not accept any additional written materials or permit
applicants to make presentations before the Board; and
WHEREAS, the information provided on the Wetlands Disclosure form (Section VI) is accurate to the best of the local
government's knowledge and ability; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary that certain conditions be met as part of the application process; and
WHEREAS, RCW 43.155.060 requires that the project will be adve~ised for competitive bids and administered
according to standard local procedure; and
WHEREAS, the loan will not exceed 90 percent (90%) of eligible costs incurred for the project; and
WHEREAS, any loan arising from this application constitutes a debt to be repaid, and
(person/title). has reviewed and concluded it has the necessary capacity to repay such
a loan; and
WHEREAS, thc information provided in this application is true and correct to the best of the government's belief and
knowledge and it is understood that the state may verify information, and that untruthful or misleading information
may be cause for rejection of this application or termination of any subsequent loan agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, (name of local government), certifies that it meets
these requirements, and further that it intends to enter into a loan agreement with the Department of Community, Trade
and Economic Development, on behalf of the Public Works Board, provided that the terms and conditions for a Public
Works Trust Fund loan are satisfactory to both parties.
Signed Title
Name Date
ATTEST
Part D: Application Form 46 2000 PWTF Consuuc~ion Applic~ion 4 7
48
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Brad Collins, Planning Director
SUBJECT: STV 99-01 "P" Street Between Milwaukee Drive and 16th Street
Issue: "P" Street and 16th Street intersections with Milwaukee Drive are at acute angles which are
unsafe and contrary to city street standards and which can be redesigned to meet city standards with
approval of STV 99-01.
Recommendation: Approve STV 99-01 vacating a portion of "P" Street abutting
Suburban Lot 84 between Milwaukee Drive and 16th Street, citing the Planning Commission's
7 findings and 3 conclusions.
Summary_: Approval of STV 99-01 will correct street intersection alignments which do not meet
city street standards because of the acute angles created by the diagonal alignment of Milwaukee
Drive in relation to the normal perpendicular grid patterns of 16th and "P" Streets. The vacation of
"P" Street in exchange for an equal amount of additional 16th Street right-of-way will correct the
intersection alignment deficiencies at Milwaukee Drive for both 16th and "P" Streets. Since the area
being exchanged with the abutting property owner, who is willing to make the exchange, is equal,
there is no compensation required in an even exchange.
Background / Analysis: The City and Mr. Leon Davis, the property owner of the abutting
portion of Suburban Lot 84, are working cooperatively to resolve the intersection deficiencies to
mutual benefit. The remaining portion of 16th Street is retained for utility right-of-way instead of
vacated to property owner on the other side of"P" Street. A subsequent street vacation/acquisition
with similar mutual benefit is planned with the Goodwin estate but could not be done concurrently
due to the death of Mr. Goodwin. After the Goodwin estate is settled, the City will work with the
new owner of the Goodwin property to complete the change to the 16th Street right-of-way.
Attachments: Ordinance
Excerpt of Planning Commission March 10, 1999, Minutes
Staff Report
49
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles
vacating a portion of the "P" Street right-of-way
abutting Suburban Lot 84 between Milwaukee Drive
and 16th Street, Port Angeles, Washington.
WHEREAS, a petition is on file with the City of Port Angeles to vacate a portion
of the "P"Street right-of-way abutting Suburban Lot 84 of the Townsite of Port Angeles between
Milwaukee Drive and 16th Street; and
WHEREAS, the petition was signed by the owners of more than two-thirds of the
property abutting upon the right-of-way sought to be vacated; and
WHEREAS, the City initiated said vacation by Resolution No. 4-99; and
WHEREAS, street vacations are categorically exempt fi.om the requirements of
the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) as se~ forth in WAC 197-11-800(2)(h); and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held before the City Council following
~ublic notice pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW; and
WHEREAS, the street vacation appears to be of benefit to and in the interest of
he public;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT
ANGELES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1 - Vacation. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, the
following described right-of-way is hereby vacated:
The westerly 40' of"P" Street lying southerly of the south margin of the
Milwaukee Drive right-of-way and abutting the east property line of
Suburban Lot 84 to the northerly margin of the 16th Street fight-of-way,
Port Angeles, Washington.
1
Section 2 - Compensation. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.030 compensation for the
right-of-way shall be the exchange of property having an equivalent value, which property is
shown in the attached Exhibit A.
Section 3 - Quit Claim Deed. Upon satisfaction of the compensation in Section 2
of this Ordinance, the owners of abutting property entitled to the vacated street, pursuant to RCW
35.79.040, may present a quit claim deed to the City of Port Angeles for execution by the Mayor,
who is hereby authorized and directed to execute such quit claim deed. Such quit claim deed shall
include all reservations, conditions, or other qualifications upon the title established by this
Ordinance.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall be effective only upon the satisfaction of the terms
and conditions of this Ordinance and shall be published upon that satisfaction. The City Clerk is
hereby directed to file a certified copy with the Clallam County Auditor and Clallam County Assessor.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of
said Council held on the 6th day of April, 1999. '
Gary Braun, Mayor
ATTEST:
Becky Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISI-IED:
By Summary
G:W_,XCHANGE\CLE RK~TV9901.0RD
2
Planning Commission Meeting
March 10, 1999
STREET VACATION PETITION - STV 99-01 - CITY/DAVIS.. "P"
Street south of Milwaukee Drive. A petition to exchange City right-of-way.
Planner Sawyer reviewed the Planning Department' staff report recommending approval of
the vacation of right-of-way as proposed which will enable the acquisition of needed right-
of-way in another area. Chair Craver opened the public hearing.
Trenia Funston, Engineering Technician, City Public Ye'orks Department, was present for
questions. She responded that the vacation of property will allow the acquisition of property
south of Mr. Davis' property to be used to continue the development of Sixteenth Street in
this area.
There being no further questions or testimony, Chair Craver closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Reed moved to recommend that the City Council approve the vacation
as proposed citing the following findings and conclusions:
1. The applicant for the requested vacation is City of Port Angeles/Mr. Davis, the
application/petition is attached as Attachment A of the March 10, 1999, Planning
Department Staff Report for STV 99-01.
2. The requested vacation is for the westerly 40' of "P" Street lying southerly of the
south margin of Milwaukee Drive fight-of-way and abutting the east property line of
Suburban Lot 84 to the northerly margin of 16th Street right-of-way identified in
Attachment A of the March 10, 1999, Planning Department Staff Report for STV 99-
01.
3. The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from threshold determination and
Environmental Impact Statement requirements per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the
Washington Administrative Code which states "(2) Other minor new construction.
The following types of construction shall be exempt... (h) The vacation of streets or
roads."
4. The Public Works Department is proposing this vacation, the vacated street area will
be used as part of a land swap with the adjacent property owner, Mr. Davis, which
will result in a reconfiguration of the 16th Street and Milwaukee Drive intersection
to a 90° design.
5. The City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element Policy B 11 reads - "New
arterial streets, local access streets, and alleys should be designed and constructed
to conform to the Statewide National Functional Classification System for Federal
Aid Systems, WSDOT, and Transportation Improvement Board minimum design
standards and standards as adopted by the City."
53
6. Section 3B.120B of the City's Department of Public Works Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines states: "Street intersections shall be laid out so as to
intersect as nearly as possible at right angles... For safe design, the following types
of intersection features should be avoided: . . . 2. "Y" type intersections where
streets meet at acute angles (less than 75 degrees)."
7. The existing 16th Street and Milwaukee Drive ROWs intersect at a 50° angle.
Conclusions:
A. The Comprehensive Plan Transportation Policy B 11 directly relates to the proposed
vacation.
B. Traffic patterns in the area will not be effected by this vacation.
C. The reconfiguration of the intersection to a 90° design will enhance the public health,
safety or welfare.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner King and passed 4 - 0.
§4
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
Illllll IIIIIIII III IIIII IIIII IIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIII I II
1'O: Planning Department
FROM: ~'id Sawyer, Senior Planner
DATE: March 10, 1999
STV 99-01
APPLICANT: City of Port Angeles/Davis
REQUEST: Vacation of a portion of "P" Street abutting Suburban BloCk 84 between
Milwaukee Drive and 16~ Street. ~
BACKGROUND:
This application has been submitted to facilitate an exchange of land between the City and Mr. Davis
which will allow for an improved design of the 160' Street and Milwaukee Drive intersection (please
see Attachment A).
DISCUSSION:
Environmental Review:
The vacating of a street is, categorically exempt from threshold determination and Environmental
Impact Statement requirements per Section 197-I 1-800 (2) (h) of the Washington Administrative Code
which states "(2) Other minor new construction. The following types of construction shall be exempt
. ,, (h) The vacation of streets or roads,"
Department Reviews and Comments:
Public ~'brk~ Department:
The Public Works Department is proposing this vacation, tt~e vacated street area x~411 be used
as pan of a land swap with the adjacent property o~x~er, Mr. Davis, which will result in. a
reconfiguration of the 16t~ Street and Milwaukee Drive intersection to a 90* design (see
Attachment A).
Planning Department Staff Report March 10, 1999
STV 9%01, (Ci~· of Port Angele~rDavis) Page 2
Fire Department:
The Fire Department has no objections to the proposed vacation,
Planning Department:
Below is a summary of potential impacts from the proposal:
Traffic Patterns: Traffic patterns in the area will not be effected by this vacation.
Utilities.: The remaining half of"P" Street will remain as public right-of-way for utility
purposes.
Public Health, Safety and Welfare: The reconfiguration of the intersection to a 90° design
will enhance the public health, safety or welfare.
Development Patterns: Development patterns in the area will not be effected by this
vacation.
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance:
The subject right-of-way and westerly adjacent property is currently designated on the City's
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as Medium Density Residential and are zoned RS-9.
The following Comprehensive Plan policy has been found to be most relevant to the proposal:
Transportation Element Policy Bl l - New arterial streets, local access streets, and alleys
should be designed and constructed to conform to the Statewide National Functional
Classification System for Federal Aid Systems, WSDOT, and Transportation Improvement
Board minimum design standards and standards as adopted by the Ci~~.
Section 3B. 120B of the City's Department of Public Works Urban Services Standards and
Guidelines states:
"Street intersections shall be laid out so as to intersect, as nearly as possible at right
angles... For safe design, the following types of intersection features should be
avoided:. ~ . 2. "Y" type intersections where streets meet at acute angles (less than
75 degrees)."
The existing ROWs intersect at a 50° angle.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of
approval to the City Council for street vacation request STV 99-01 based on the following findings
and conclusions:
56
Planning Department Staff Report March I0, 1999
STV 99-01. (City of Port Angeles,;Davis) Page 3
Findings:
1. The applicant for the requested vacation is City of Port Angeles/Mr. Davis, the
application/petition is attached as Attachment A of the March 10, 1999, Planning
Deparunent Staff Report for STV 99-01.
2. The requested vacation is for the westerly 40' of "P' Street lying southerly of the
south margin of Milwaukee Drive right-of-way and abutting the east property line of
Suburban Lot 84 to the northerly margin of 16~' Street right-of-way identified in
Attachment A of the March 10, 1999, Planning Department Staff Report for STV 99-
01.
3. The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from threshold determination and
Environmental Impact Statement requirements per Section i97-11-800 (2) (h) of the
Washington Administrative Code which states "(2) Other minor new construction~
The following types of construction shall be exempt... (h) The vacation of streets or
roads."
The Public Works Department is proposing this vacation, the vacated street area will
be used as part of a land swap with the adjacent propert3' owmer, Mr. Davis, which
will result in a reconfiguration of the 16~ Street and Milwaukee Drive intersection
to a 90° design.
5. The City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element Policy B11 reads - "New
arterial streets, local access streets, and alley, s should be designed and constructed
to conform to the Statewide National Functional Classification System for Federal
Aid Systems, WSDOT, and Transportation Improvement Board minimum design
standards and standards as adopted by the Ci~'. "
6. Section 3B.120B of the City's Department of Public Works Urban Sen, ices
Standards and Guidelines states: "Street intersections shall be laid out so ax to
intersect as nearly as possible at right angles... For safe design, the following
of intersection features should be avoided: . . . 2 "Y" O'pe intersections where
streets meet at acute angles (less than 75 degrees)."
7. The existing 16~ Street and Milwaukee Drive ROWs intersect at a 50° angle.
Conclusions
A. The Comprehensive Plan Transportation Policy B t I directly relates to the proposed
vacation.
B. Traffic patterns in the area will not be effected by this vacation.
C. The reconfiguration of the intersection to a 90° design w411 enhance the public health,
safety or welfare.
STVgu(~
§7
crr'Y OF PORT GELE$ I 'l
Come now the undersigned petitioner~ and pmuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW respectfully show:
The undersigned petitioners request that the following described portion of
Street/Alley in the Ci.ty of Port Angeles be vacated p~u~.u~t to Chapter 35.79 RCW (legally describe the
property, requested for vacation below). ,
2. Each of the undersigned petitioners is the owner of an interest in real estate abutting on the above
described area.
3. ~ persons own property abutting on said area.
4. The names and addresses ofpropert3t, owners abutting on said areas are as follows:
5, The undersigned petitioners constitute more than two thirds ofthe owners of said abutting
propervy.
WHE~FORE, t~he petitioners ask that proceedings be commenced hereon for the vacation
of said area of said "to Street/Alley in the manner prescribed in Chapter 35,79 R, CW.
Respectfully submitted,
City Council of the City of Port ,~ngeles, gFashington - PtA~ ~n~r~'""'---'"""'"'' ,, , ,, I
Come now thc undersigned petitioners and pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW respectfully show:
1. Thc undersigned petitioners request that thc following d~scrib~l portion of __ ."? Street
Street/Alley in the City of Por~ Angeles be vacated pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW ~legally d~cribe ihe
~oropertyreque~te~forvacationbeiow). THE WESTERLY fR}' OF "P" STREET LYING
!
SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTH MARGIN OF MILWAUKEE DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY AND
ABUTTING THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF SUBURBAN LOT 84 TO THE NORTHERLY
MARGIN OF SIXTEENTH STREET RIGHT OF WAY. I
2. Each of thc undersigned petition.s is the owner oran interest in real estate abutting on the above
described area.
The names and ad~ ofproptnty owners abutting on said areas are as follows:
LEON.DAVIS 15Ot~ MC DONALD STREET
The undersigned petitioners con~tute more than two thirds of the owners of said abu~g
propertT,.
WHEREFORE, the petitioners ask that proceedings be commenced hereon for the vacafon
o£said at~a of said SlreeuAlley in the manner prescribed in Chapter 35.79 RCW.
Respectfully submitted,
60
pO TA. '¢.ELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Late Council Agenda Item
Attached is a memo to the Mayor and City Council regarding a proposed amendment to the DSHS
parking lease. Due to the need for coordinating with a number of parties and individuals, this item
was not ready for inclusion in the Council packet. However, the developer of the DSHS building
downtown is anxious to proceed with utilizing the parking area for construction staging.
Accordingly, staff requests the Council to consider the proposed lease amendment as a late item.
Craig D. Knu~
City Attorney
CDK:cb
Attachment
C:\OFFICE\WPWII'&WPDOCSkHOLDING~040699.05
pORTANGI LES
V~/ A $ H [ N G T O N, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
TO: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Craig Knutson, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Amendment to Lease Agreement for D.S.H.S. Parking
Issue: Revise lease with First Street Plaza L.L.C. (Eric Dupar) for use of Downtown Parking LotI
"A" for construction staging.
Recommendation: Authorize Mayor to sign amendment to Parking Facility Lease Agreement with
First Street Plaza L.L.C..
Summary_: Last May the City, with the concurrence of the Downtown Association (PADA), entered
into a lease agreement with First Street Plaza L.L.C. to provide parking spaces in the existing
Parking Lost A for the new Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS)
facility (old J.C. Penney's building). The lease also provided for temporary revisions to the parking
lot for staging of equipment and materials during construction. Now that construction has begun, the
staging area specified in the lease agreement has proven to be unwieldly and all parties (City, PADA
and Developer) would like to amend the lease to revise the staging area, clarify language meant to
minimize parking conflicts in other areas of the parking lot~and clarify the term of the lease.
Background / Analysis: The attached amendment revises the configuration of the staging area to
minimize impacts to the remaining parking spaces in lot A and traffic in and around the area (see
revised Exhibit A attached). The amendment also fixes the starting date for the lease which was
originally open ended. The PADA has reviewed the revisions to the staging area and are in favor of
the amendment as is the developer~who has changed contractors since the lease was originally
entered into. Reconfiguring the staging area as proposed in the lease amendment will decrease the
number of parking spaces to construction and improve the safety of users entering and
leaving parking lot A.
N:PWKS/LIGHT/DIRECTOR/FILE S/PADAPARK.WPD
AMENDMENT TO
LEASE AGREEMENT
(Parking Facility)
THIS AMENDMENT to the May 19, 1998, Lease Agreement between the City of Port Angeles and
First Street Plaza L.L.C. is entered into this __ day of , 1999.
Representations.
1. The parties have agreed to revise the commencement and termination dates for the term of the
Lease.
2. The parties have also agreed to revise the provision of the Lease dealing with the reconfiguration
of the parking facilities and staging area.
Agreements.
In consideration of the above representations and the covenants and agreements set forth below, the parties
hereby agree as follows:
1. Paragraph 3 (Term) of the May 19, 1998, Lease Agreement is hereby amended to read as
follows:
3. Tenn. The Lease shall be for a term of ten (10) years, commencing on June l, 1999 and
terminating on July 31, 2009.
2. Paragraph 15 (Reconfiguration of Parking Facilities and Staging) of the May 19, 1998, Lease
Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
15. Reconfiguration of Parking Facilities and Staging.
A. Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost and expense, be responsible for the work
involved to reconfigure the parking facilities to allow for the parking and necessary lighting
under this lease. Upon completion of such work, all the expenses to maintain the spaces shall be
the sole cost of the Landlord. The reconfiguration shall be in accordance with a mutually agreed
upon detailed plan and bid; provided, however, that the bid to reconfigure the parking facilities
shall not exceed $35,000.
B. Tenant shall have the right to use a portion of parking lot "A" for the staging
of construction equipment and materials during Tenant' s renovation and addition to the existing
former J.C. Penney building located south of parking lot "A"; provided, however, that this right
shall be conditioned upon the following:
1. Tenant must have executed a binding agreement and/or lease with DSHS
for the above-referenced office building development; and
2. Tenant's staging of construction equipment and materials shall be for a
period of not to exceed 90 days from the beginning of construction unless the parties have
mutually agreed to an extension of said 90-day period; and
3. Tenant shall not impede the existing tenant's parking in portions of
Parking Lot"A" that are not designated and being used for staging of equipment and materials;
and
4. Tenant's staging shall be limited to the east one-third of the portion of
parking lot "A" that is shaded and designated "RESERVED FOR D.S.H.S." on the attached
Exhibit "A" plus a 35 x 50 foot area lying north and east of the southeast comer of the area
described above as shown on the attached Exhibit "A".
C. In the event that Tenant or any entity working on behalf of Tenant damages any
portion of the parking facilities and does not reconstruct the damaged area during the parking
facility reconfiguration set forth in Section 15, Tenant shall repair the damage to the same or
better condition.
D. Tenant shall defend and hold Landlord and its agents harmless from any claim,
action, and/or judgment for damages to property or injury to persons suffered or alleged to be
suffered during said reconfiguration or staging, and Tenant shall provide for owner's and
contractor's protective insurance and commercial general liability insurance against claims for
injuries to persons or damage to property, which may arise from or in connection with said
reconfiguration or staging, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 for each injury and $1,000,000
for all injuries from a single accident, with the Landlord and PADA named as additional insureds.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Lease Amendment has been executed the date and year first above written.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES FIRST STREET PLAZA L.L.C.
By By
Gary Braun, Mayor , President
By By
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk , Secretary
PORT ANGELES DOWNTOWN
ASSOCIATION
By
Eileen Knight, President
State of Washington )
) SS.
County of Clallam )
On this day of ,1999, personally appeared before me Gary Braun and Becky J.
Upton, to me known to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Port Angeles, the
municipal corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument
to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed,
if any, is the corporate seal of said municipal corporation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year
first above written.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
residing at
My commission expires:
State of Washington )
County of Clallam )
On this __ day of , 1999, personally appeared before me
and , to me known to
be the and , respectively, of First Street Plaza
L.L.C., the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said
instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed,
if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. '
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year
first above written.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
residing at
My commission expires:
State of Washington )
) SS.
County of Clallam )
On this __ day of , 1999, personally appeared before me Eileen Knight, to me
known to be the President of the Port Angeles Downtown Association, the association that executed the
within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and
deed of said association, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that she was
authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said
association.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year
first above written.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
residing at
My commission expires:
A:kAMPKG.LST
4
F-XHI[~IT A
I- _1 ~- - - m I-
[] I I ~ ~u~z,c sp^cEs I i~
x~ I I 3~* ,s, ~-Eo. s~^c~'s I
I ~ o.s...s, s~s I
120 PROPO~D I
~ L~ ' I
I
~ I ~> ~---
Z ~- ~- -~ - ~- ~- ~ ~- -~ '
: I, < $:
/
I
I
~ I I
_~ I I I
CITY OF PORT ANGELES SCALE
PUBLIC WORKS
e ~ PA~KING LOT A
Plot Date: 03/~9/99 Revision Da~e: 03/~9/99 FiLe:95PMOO8
FOR
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
TO: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Patrick Ibarra, City Manager
SUBJECT: City Manager's Report
UPCOMING MEETINGS
APRIL:
Board of Adjustment meeting Monday, April 5 7:00 p.m.
City Council Meeting Tuesday, April 6 6:00 p.m.
Solid Waste Advisory Committee Tuesday, April 6 3:00 p.m.
Fire Sprinkler Educational Forum
City Council Chambers Wednesday, April 7 6:30 p.m.
Lunch with Congressman Dicks Thursday, April 8 Noon
City Council Chambers
Sr. Center Board of Advisors Monday, April 12 2:00 p.m.
Utility Advisory Committee Monday, April 12 3:00 p.m.
Law Enforcement Advisory Board Tuesday, April 13 6:30 p.m.
North Olympic Peninsula Cities
Association meeting Wednesday, April 14 6:00 p.m.
Planning Commission Wednesday, April 14 7:00 p.m.
Parks & Rec Beautification
Commission meeting Thursday, April 15 7:00 p.m.
Morse-Elwha Watershed Planning
61
Public Forum Monday, April 19 6:00 p.m.
City Council Meeting Tuesday, April 20 6:00 p.m.
Public Utility District - City
meeting ~ City Hall Wednesday, April 21 1:30 p.m.
Downtown Cleanup Campaign Saturday, April 24 9:00 - 1:00 p.m.
Downtown Forward Meeting Monday, April 26 9:00 a.m.
Planning Commission meeting Wednesday, April 28 7:00 p.m.
Public Works Director
Candidate Reception Thursday, April 29 5:00 p.m.
Employee Service Pin Ceremony Monday, May 3 11:30 a.m.
Board of Adjustment meeting Monday, May 3 7:00 p.m.
City Council Meeting Tuesday, May 4 6:00 p.m.
Gateway Center Project Committee
meeting Thursday, May 6 8:15 a.m.
Cascadia Mayors Conference Friday, May 7 All day
Victoria
Sr. Center Board of Advisors Monday, May 10 2:00 p.m.
Utility Advisory Committee Monday, May 10 3:00 p.m.
Law Enforcement Advisory Bd Tuesday, May 11 6:30 p.m.
Planning Commission meeting Wednesday, May 12 7:00 p.m.
LUNCH PROGRAM WITH CONGRESSMAN DICKS
On Thursday, April 8, Noon in the Council Chambers, the local Science Technology &
Manufacturing Association (STMA) is hosting a luncheon with Congressman Dicks. If any member
of Council is interested in attending, please notify Sam at your earliest convenience.
UPDATE ON SEARCH FOR NEW PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITY DIRECTOR
Fred Pabst of the Waldron Company, Bob Coons and I met on March 24 to review the twenty-one
candidates who responded to the supplemental questionnaire. After much discussion, the list was
reduced to ten for additional follow-up. Fred is in the process of conducting brief interviews with
each of the ten candidates. We will meet again on April 12 to review the information generated at
62
those preliminary interviews and reduce the list to five-to-six finalists. Interviews are scheduled for
Thursday, April 29 and Friday, April 30. Each candidate will experience three interviews during
those two days - one each from an employee panel, department directors and final one with Fred,
Bob and myself. A reception has been scheduled for Thursday April 29, 5 p.m. or so, at the Port
Angeles Crab House, as an opportunity for Council members, department directors and myself to
become more acquainted with the candidates and their spouses. Subsequent to the final interviews,
I will most likely visit the community of the top one and/or two candidates and meet with their
supervisor, co-workers and others to provide more insight into the candidate's current work
environment. In order to gain a broad perspective of the candidate, Bob Coons, and Scott Brodhun,
will be accompanying me on that visit.
EMPLOYEE SERVICE ANNIVERSARY LUNCHEON
Each year, the City presents pins to employees who are reaching their 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 years of
service to the City. This luncheon ceremony is scheduled for Monday, May 3, 11:30 a.m., in the
Vern Burton Center. The week of May 3 through 8 is recognized as Public Service Recognition
Week and I thought it appropriate to schedule the luncheon the same week as a means of celebration.
Additional information on Public Service Recognition Week will be forthcoming. Members of
Council are invited to attend the luncheon and we hope to see you there.
Y2K CONVERSION- UPDATE
As I reported in the February 16 City Manager's Report, I appointed Bruce Becker, Fire Chief, to
serve as the City's coordinator on this matter. He and representatives from each department have
been meeting to discuss each department's contingency plan should the need arise. Progress has
been steady in preparing these plans and another meeting of this group is scheduled for April 7.
Upon conferring with Bruce and evaluating the progress made to date, it appears the briefing to
Council will be scheduled for either the May 18 meeting or June 1 meeting. Once the date has been
set, I will notify Council and provide the necessary background information for your review.
CABLE TV GOVERNMENT & EDUCATION CHANNEL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The City's Cable TV Government & Education Channel Advisory Committee recently met to
address future growth and utilization of Channel 21. Becky Upton, City Clerk, staffs this
Committee. Participating agencies have increased utilization of Channel 21 by sponsoring various
programs on videotape, as well as character generated messages. The character generator used by
the City was previously owned by Northland Cable and is several years old. It is no longer supported
by parts and maintenance, is not at all "user friendly", and all messages placed on the character
generator for user agencies must be entered by City staff in a very cumbersome fashion. In addition,
the City has had the use of only one VCR, so broadcasts must be programmed on an individual basis,
sometimes requiring programming during weekends by staff.
The advisory committee recommended that the City purchase an additional VCR, as well as
computer-based character generator capabilities. The total approximate cost would be $4,500, and
installation should be complete in about two months. The expenditures would be paid for out of the
General Fund, which was the recipient of $12,500 from Northland Cable in 1994 as a requirement
63
of the Franchise Ordinance. The $4,500 expense will now deplete the remaining funds from
Northland. It is expected that character generated messages will be more professional in appearance
and will be much easier to enter by City staff.
REPAIRS OF 8TH STREET PAVEMENT
The street crew will be working on 8th Street repairing the significant deterioration that has occurred
during the month of May. WSDOT will be using a grinder between April 15 and May 1 st and the
street crew will use the same machine after May 1st. This machine will allow the crew to grind the
pothole areas prior to using a hot asphalt patch. It is hoped that this effort will gain a patch that will
last until the reconstruction project is competed. This machine will also make it possible for us to
remove some asphalt in the wheel ruts on the bridges and replace the asphalt, improving the ride.
STATUS OF 5TH AND TUMWATER STREET SLIDE REPAIR
Tumwater Street from Marine Drive to 5th Street is still closed due to the slide that occurred in
January. A geologist has reviewed the site and identified a preliminary solution in order to arrive
at a cost estimate ($250,000) for the repairs. The City of Port Angeles has been included in the
Clallam County disaster declaration which has been forwarded to the State. The City is now waiting
for confirmation from the State and Federal governments that disaster funding is available to repair
the street. A representative from the Washington State Department of Transportation will be in Port
Angeles on April 1st to review the damage. More should be known after that visit.
NO EARTH DAY AT LANDFILL
To celebrate Earth Day, the City had been allowing users to dispose of waste at the landfill on or
around that day, at no charge. Unfortunately, due to the ongoing construction at the landfill and the
associated impacts to the operation, it appears this service cannot be provided this year.
WRIA 18 MEETINGS
Under ESHB 2514, the State Legislature set up a program for watershed planning by Water
Resources Inventory Area (WRIA). The City, County, Tribes, and Agnew Irrigation District are the
initiating governments leading the watershed planning for the Elwha to Dungeness River Basins
(WRIA 18). Brad Collins, Planning Director, is the City staff person assigned to this project. The
Dungeness Watershed Plan has been developed over the last four or five years, and the City, Lower
Elwha Klallam Tribe, and Clallam County have the lead responsibilities to bring the Morse-Elwha
Watershed Plan up to the level of the Dungeness Plan. Because we do not have four or five years
like the Dungeness River Management Team, we are using a public facilitation group Triangle
Associates to create an outreach program that will help citizen groups in the Morse-Elwha watershed
planning process.
The first major step in the public outreach program is to hold two forums to provide information
about the process and to identify citizen representatives for the Morse-Elwha River Management
Team, which will complement the Dungeness River Management Team in the western portion of
WRIA 18. The first public forum is scheduled for Monday, April 19th, from 6:00 to 9:00 pm in the
Vem Burton Memorial Community Center. Councilman Campbell is involved in the public outreach
program. The second meeting is tentatively set for Saturday, May 15th, from 8:30 am to 12:30 pm
in the Senior Center.
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Patrick Ibarra, City Manager
SUBJECT: Clallam County Opportunity Fund
As was discussed at the recent joint meeting held with the Clallam County Commissioners, the
Opportunity Fund Program has been put in final draft form for agencies to review. Attached is the
revised draft as prepared under the direction of the County. Tim Smith and I have reviewed the
proposal and prepared several comments. Overall, it appears satisfactory though we believe some
areas definitely require additional discussion. Tim and I will be attending a meeting scheduled by
the EDC on Friday, April 2, to discuss with other governmental agencies the revised draft. Since
the Council packet will be photocopied while I am attending that meeting, I will report any
substantive comments generated at that meeting at the April 6 Council meeting. The deadline for
submitting comments to the County is Tuesday, April 6, though Jim Rumpeltes indicated they, most
likely, will accept them until the end of the week.
Section 1.0 Goals and Objectives:
1. Page 2, add a subsection for Definitions. Define public facilities and basic industry. This
may help avoid any misinterpretations at a later time.
2. Page 3, Priority #8 "...adverse environmental impact" seems out of place. There is another
reference to "...environmental goals..." on page 14. Since all projects would be subject to
applicable federal, state and local regulations, is this really necessary.
3. Page 3, bottom of page, there is reference to Proposition 49 where the ability to fund jails
may be involved. This seems to conflict with page 4, last paragraph, which says OPF funds
"...shall not be spent on construction of public facilities...related to government
administration and/or does not increase the base economy."
Section 2.0 Standards for the OFP Portfolio:
4. Page 5, Eligible Recipients has been revised to include all local agencies, but not private
agencies alone. While not permitting private agencies by their selves may be appropriate,
including all local agencies appears awfully expansive of those agencies traditionally
involved with economic development.
65
5. Page 5, Eligible Loan Types, the reference to "...bridge, road..." appears too narrow and
should be revised to read "...transportation system infrastructure, not including rolling
stock,...", which would be much more flexible and could then allow OFP consideration of
trails, trams, monorails, marine ferry support infrastructure, and (very important) intelligent
highway systems (ITS). This section should also add other important public facilities which
are missing such as storm water, telecommunications, land acquisition (including potential
for clearing, grading and filling).
Section 3 Grant and Loan Financing Policies:
6. Page 6, Standard Loan Terms, three (3) year terms on loans is much too short. Time period
should be say 10, 20 or possibly even 30 years. The original proposal was 20 years.
7. Page 8, Standard Interest Rates. The County proposal calls for loan rates at a point below
prime, which is awfully high. The original recommendation was "at a rate equivalent to the
average cost of municipal borrowing". On 3/6/98 the prime rate was 7.75%, though the cost
of municipal borrowing was only 4.68%-5.54%. The County proposal would cost more than
normal municipal borrowing which would be a significant disincentive.
8. Page 9, Fees to Borrowers: is rather ambiguous and provides the County much latitude. More
specificity is needed.
Section 4 Administrative Elements of the Plan:
9. Page 9, Administrative Elements, first paragraph, last sentence should add a few words to
read "The intent of the OFP...by retaining, expanding, and attracting business through
infi'astmcture improvements."
10. Page 9, Composition of the Board has been changed from the original recommendation of
5 to 9. Two representatives would represent Port Angeles.
Section 5.0 Staff Capacity
No comments
Section 6.0 Loan Selection, Approval
11. Page 13, note that the annual limit on applications will be 4. More than 4 will require special
authorization. The selection of a set number seems rather arbitrary.
Section 7.0 Administrative Costs
12. Page 14, similar to the earlier comment on Fees, more specificity should be made to clarify
exact fees and costs associated with processing applications.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact me.
Table of Contents
1.0 Goals and Objectives ............................................... ....................................... 2
1.1 Policy .......................................................................................................... 2
1.2 Program Activities ................... .................................................................... 2
1.3 Priorities ....................................................................................................... 2
1.4 Consistency with Area Economic and Comprehensive Plans ..................... 3
1.5 Interrelationship with other Programs ......................................................... 3
2.0 Standards for the OFP Portfolio ...................................................................... 4
2.1 Job/Cost Ratio ......................... ; ................................................................... 4
2.2 Funding Ratio .............................................................................................. 4
2.3 Activities Financed ...................................................................................... 4
2.4 Eligible OFP Fund Recipients ..................................................................... 5
2.'5 Allocation of Financial Resources ............................................................... 5 -
2.6 Eligible Loan Types .... , ................................................................................ 5
2.7 Eligible Grant Types .................................................................... ~ ............... 5
3.0 Grant and Loan General Financing Policies .................................................. 6
3.1 Standard Terms Applicable to All Loans ................ : .................................... 6
3.2 Standard Terms Applicable to All Grants .................................................... 7
3.3 Modifying Loan and Grant Terms ................................................................ 7
3.4 Standard Interest Rates .............................................................................. 8
3.5 Special Financing TechniqueS ................... : ................................................ 8
3.6 Collateral and Equity Requirements ...................................... : .................... 8
9.7 Fees to Borrowers ....................................................................................... 9
4.0 AdminiStrative Elements of the Plan ............................................................... 9
4.1 Composition of the Opportunity Fund Board ........................... ~ ...... .. ............ 9
4.2 Responsibilities of Opportunity Fund Board ............................................. 10
4.3 Opportunity Fund Board Meetings .... ' ................ ; ................................. : ..... 11
Quorum ......................................................................................................... 11
Voting .... - ......................................................................................................... 12
4.4 Conflict of Interest ............................................... , ..................................... 12
5.0 Staff Capacity ............................................................................................... 12
5.1 Clallam County Administrative Staff Responsibilities ............. ~ .... · ............... 12
6.0 Loan Selection, Approval Process and Servicing .................... : ................... 13
8.1 Application Review Process - Staff Functions ........................................... 13
Treasurer's Office Services ........................................................................... 13
Staff Administrator Monitoring Activities ........... ..................................... : ....... 14
7.0 Opportunity Fund Administrative Costs ....................' ...... . ...... : ............... :.. ...... 14 ..
8.0. Availability of Loans and Grants ................................................... : .............. 14 '
9.0 Other Considerations ................................................................................... 15
1
OPPORTUNITY FUND PROGRAM (OFP) OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
1.0 Goals and Objectives
In 1997 the s.tatelegislature authorized economically distressed counties to
impose a .04% sales tax to finance public facilities. The tax is an offset against
the state's portion of the sales tax. Therefor, there is no net effect on local sales
tax rates. The goal of the legislation is to provide additional funds to increase
the economy of the distressed counties by financing public facilities that will
result in new jobs through businesses expansion and'recruitment.
Funds from the Opportunity Fund Program, herein after referenced as OFP,
shall be used to improve the base economy in the incorporated and
unincorporated areas of Clallam County, through the attraction of businesses
with grants and Iow interest loans for public facilities. For the purposes of the
OFP, improving the base economy shall mean the creation of jobs that result in
new wealth creation through primary economic activities, such as manufacturing
or extra-regional trade, as compared to those sectors of the economY that
recycle existing wealth.such as retail trade or government.
1.1 Policy
The administering of the moneys provided to Clallam County under RCW
82.14.370, shall, herein after be referred to as the Opportunity Fund
Program, or the OFP. OFP money shall be used to support the creation
of public facilities in a manner which is consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies outlined herein.
1.2 Program Activities ·
The essential activities of the OFP includes the creation of new jobs and
income, and improving economic opportunities. In order to address these
issues and to bring about the desired changes, the OFP aims to:
1. Promote the ongoing operation of businesses;
2. Promote the expansion of existing businesses;
3. Attract new businesses;
4. Assist in the development of new businesses from 'within the
incorporated and unincorporated areas of Clallam County; and
5. Provide family wage jobs to the citizens Of the County.
1.3 PHoHties.
2
The top priority of the OFP is to create new jobs by stimulating private
investment which, in turn will, improve the economy Of the residents of the
incorporated and unincorporated areas within Clallam County. Grants
and loans shall only be given to support the creation of public facilities
that stimulate the base economy, as defined herein. Priority shall be
given to the criterion in the following order:
1. Improvements which have a large job creation-to-funding ratio shall
be given the highest priority.
2. Retention or expansion proposals that exhibit a higher probability
for supporting immediate basic industry job opportunities, over
recruitment proposals that do not provide a similar probability.
3. Projects that leverage public and public/private financial
partnerships.
4. Fast repayment schedules.
5. Redevelopment, in-fill and expansion of existing infrastructure
systems.
6. Higher match percentage, and the use of outside fund leveraging.
Match may include project-related expenditures for a period up to
one year prior to the request for funding.
7. Projects which will immediately benefit the incorporated or
unincorporated areas of Clallam County.
8. Projects that do not have a significant adverse environmental
imPact.
1.4 ConSistency with Area Economic and Comprehensive Plans
· The OFP was developed in conjunction with local and state government
officials. All projects must be consistent with all applicable regulations,
including the appropriate city~ county, and county-wide comprehensive
plans.
1.$ Interrelationship with other Programs
The OFP compliments the following curriculum:
· Economic Development Administration
· Rural Development Administration
· Transportation Improvement Board
· Community Economic Revitalization Board
· Development Loan Fund
· PUblic Works Trust Fund
· . Department of ECologY .. -
· ' Revolving Technical Assistance Loan Fund
· Proposition 49, Juvenile Services PUblic Facilities
3
The very real possibility exists that a project would be eligible for one or
more of the above loan or grant programs in addition to OFP funding.
· Applicants should explore .the possibility of receiving funding from other
possible sources for any proposed project.
'2.0 Standards forthe OFP Portfolio
This section presents the standards to be achieved by the OFP portfolio as a
whole. Individual loans and grants may vary somewhat depending upon the
economic benefits to be achieved, but OFP loans and grants shall generally
conform to the standards specified in this section.
2.1 Job/Cost Ratio
Job to cost analysis~applies only to OFP loan applications, since OFP
grants do not directly create or save jobs. However, OFP grant
applications are expected to establish immediate economic benefits to be
derived by successful completion of the project. In many cases, the
product of an OFP. study shall enable new business activities to occur
which will include new jobs or save jobs. Therefore, to the extent
possible, the potential effects of an OFP funded project on saving or
creating jobs should be evaluated by the local jurisdiction or the local
Economic Development Council.
· Maximum oFP investment for an individual loan is $50,000 per job.
Maximum investment per job for the OFP portfolios is $30,000.
Applications demonstrating a lower investment per job shall be given
preference. The job types can be categorized as unskilled, semi-skilled,
and skilled. ~
2.2 Funding Ratio
Funds provided shall not exceed 50% of the project cost. The cost may
include in-kind expenses.
2.3 Activities Financed
Moneys for the OFP shall only be spent to support the construction of
public facilities, as defined herein, the creation of feasibility studies, and
the administration of the OFP.
· MoneyS.from ~the ~OFP shall not be spent on the' construction of public
facilities, as defined herein, which' are directly related to .government
administration and/or does not increase the base economy.
4
2.4 Eligible OFP Fund Recipients
Eligible OFP fund recipients shall include all Federal, State, and local
agencies located within Clallam County. All private entities,'including
individuals, corporations, and partnerships, must apply in tandem with an
eligible OFP fund recipient, as defined above, and may not aPply for a
loan or grant directly to the Opportunity Fund Board, herein after
referenced as the OFB. All applications shall include a written letter of
support signed by a member of the respective board or *city council.
2.5 Allocation of Financial Resources
The total .amount of loans and grants distributed by the OFP should not
exceed 50% of the total revenues from the previous year. The remaining
50% of OFP funds should be available for emergent opportu, nities. The
fund balance, minus the administrative costs of the OFP, shall be
allocated at 80% for loans, and 20% for grants. To conserve fund equity,
principal deferrals or similar flexible repayment techniques should be
used to offset financial hardship in lieu of grants.
2.6 Eligible Loan Types
All OFP funds shall be only be used for projects rOund'to be consistent
with all other goals, policies, and requirements as defined herein. Loan
projects must meet the following criteria:
1. The project must' be for the creation of a bridge, road, domestic or
industrial water system, sanitary-sewage system, railroad, electricity
· system, natural gas system, port facility, building, or structures, whiCh
have a direct positive impact on improving the base economy, herein
after referred to as a public facility.
2.The loan term shall be shorter than the useful life of the assets.
3. The loan must improve the base economy for the incorporated or
unincorported areas of Clallam County.
4. Loan projects shall result in the direct and immediate creation of a
public facility.
2.7 Eligible Grant Types
Grant projects must meet the following criteria:
1. Grants maybe use.d for the purChase of expert consulting assistance
to carry out'feasibility studies which analyze, develop strategies,
develop action plans and provide expert services which, if
5
implemented, will lead to the immediate and/or progressive
construction of a public facility that will result in improving the base
economy.
3,0 Grant and Loan General Financing Policies
OFP loans to a single eligible borrower shall be a minimum of $20,000. OFP
grants to a single grant recipient shall be a minimum of $5,000. The maximum
allowed loan should not exceed 80% of the total OFP funds available. An OFP
grant should not exceed 20% of the total OFP funds available.
3.1 Standard 'Terms Applicable to All Loans
The standard terms for repayment of the OFP loan are subject to
negotiation with theborrower, in accordance with the following guidelines:
1. The date of interest payment,, unless negotiated otherwise, shall be
due every June 1st until the loan is paid off. The date of interest
payment and principal shall be due every December 1st until the loan
is paid off. A negotiated moratoria on the principle may be
considered, but for no more than six (6) months from the date of
disbursement. Proposed exceptions shall be reviewed by the OFB.
2.Loan terms shall not exceed three (3) years.
3. The OFB may specify or limit the uses of OFP funds if deemed
necessary and prudent...
4. The OFB and Treasurer may include special clauses in a loan
agreement which stipulate payments, decreased payments, or
increased repayment amounts under, certain circumstances. In each
case where such a clause is utilized, the language shall clearly
establish the thresholds which would cause a change in the payment
schedule. These thresholds may include, but are not limited to, the
completion of a project ahead of the deadline(s).
5. Specific perfOrmance required of the borrower, including meeting
payment schedules, timely completion of project phases, and other
conditions of the loan shall be specified in each contract between the
County and the borrower. Failure to comply with the .contract places
the borrower in default enabling the County Staff Administrator to
accelerate debt repayment or demand full payment. The terms will
also include the rights of the borrower to remedy the default.
6. Detailed penalty fees, ra(es in case of default, and late payment
penalties shall be contained in the contract between the County and
the borrower.
7. NO penalty'of any kind shall be levied against any borrower who '
chooses to repay all or any part of a loan prior to the repayment'
schedule.
6
8. A monitoring system shall be in place which states deadlines for
completing specific project phases direct!y related to the loan. The
monitoring system should include penalties for not achieving
predetermined deadlines.
3.2 Standard Terms Applicable to All Grants
The standard terms for OFP grants are subject to negotiation, in
accordance with the following guidelines:
1. One (1) payment at the completiOn of the project or payments based
on a schedule determined in the monitoring system shall be used.
2. The OFB may specify or limit the uses of OFP funds if deemed
necessary and prudent.
3. Detailed penalty fees and rates in case of breach of grant agreement
or other noncompliance will be contained in the contract between the
County and the OFP fund recipient.
4. The OFB.and the Treasurer may include special clauses in a grant
agreement-which stipulate decreased payments or repayment
amounts under certain circumstances. In each case when such a
clause is utilized, the language shall clearly establish ·the thresholds
which would cause a change in the payment schedule. These
thresholds could include, but are not limited to, completing a project
ahead of the schedule.
5. A monitoring system shall be in place which states deadlines for
completing specific activities directly related to the grant. The
activities should be detailed as to the characteristics. The monitoring
system should include penalties for not achieving predetermined
deadlines.
3.3 Modifying Loan and Grant Terms
OFP loan and grant terms shall be*properly documented by the County
Staff Administrator. There are circumstances which may warrant
modifying the original terms of the loan or grant. It is possible that debts
will have to be restructured on occasion to accommodate unanticipated
problems, but short of a city disincorporating itself to avoid its debts, all
public sector debts shall be repaid to the OFP. A workable restructuring
of the loan or grant for the financial debt or project requirements may be
necessitated, and done so by the County Staff Administrator.
The actions taken by the County Staff Administrator on any loan or grant
in default or near default may be reviewed and amended by the OFB.
*when it' is determined that the OFP fund recipients ability.to comply.with.
7
the terms of the contract will be truly improved, the OFB may restructure
the terms of the original loan or grant agreement.
3,4 Standard Interest Rates
The minimum interest rate for. OFP loans shall be no less then one
percentage (1.0%) point below the current money center prime rate
quoted in the most recent Wall .Street Journal at the time of OFB loan
approval. The maXimum, interest rate should not exceed the current
money center prime rate quoted in the Wall Street Journal at the time of
OFB loan approval. The OFB shall set interest at a higher level when
such interest rates are deemed prudent. OFP income will be reinvested
into the OFP lending, grant, and administration pool,
3,5 Special Financing Techniques
OFP loans and grants should be part of a larger package involving
another lender such as the Community Economic Revitalization Program..
OFP loans and grants should be used to fill a gap in the total project
financing.
The OFB shall receive recommendations on the terms for financing each
OFP loan or grant from the County Staff Administrator. To determine
whether County Staff Administrator recommendations reflect maximum
efficiency, the OFB must evaluate:
· The strength of the proposal
· The credit worthiness of the borrower
· The realism of the projected job to dollar ratio, and
· The terms generally available for financing
3.6 Collateral and Equity Requirements
Collateral will not be required for public sector OFP fund recipients.
Generally, OFP loans should be made on a direct basis by the loan fund
to the borrower. In the case of direct loans, the County 'shall receive all
payments of principal and interest and all proceeds of liquidation. '
Due to legal and practical restrictions, loans to eligible borrowers will not
be secured. However, loans will be general obligations of the eligible
OFP fund recipient, committing its full faith and credit. Care will be taken
that proper borrowing or grant funding resolutions are obtained. Loans
shall not be made which will cause the jurisdiction, to exceed its legal
bori'owing limits.
8
3.7 Fees to Borrowers
Loan fees may be charged to applicants for loan packaging services.
Fees collected are to be considered OFP income. While it is anticipated
that the County Prosecutor's Office will perform legal services required for
the OFP, if outside counsel is required, the fees will be charged to the
applicant.
4.0' Administrative Elements of the Plan
The family median income and unemployment trends for the incorporated and
unincorporated areas of Clallam County clarifies the need for the OFP. The
intent of the OFP is to increase the economic base of the incorporated and
unincorporated areas of Clallam County by attracting businesses through
infrastructure improvements.
The Clallam County Department of Community Development shall assume the
responsibility for administering the funds. The final policy making authority for
the Opportunity Fund Program, hereinafter referred to as the OFP, shall rest with
the Clallam County Board of'Commissioners. However, in order to effectively
achieve the goals and policies of the OFP, the County shall establish an
Opportunity Fund Board.
4.1 Composition of the Opportunity Fund Board
The OFB shall consist of no more than nine (9) members, including a
chairperson, each with a background in economic development. The
unincorporated areas of Clallam County, the Port of Port Angeles, and the
Cities of .Forks, Port Angeles, and.Sequim shall each have the right to
appoint at least one representative on the OFB. The remaining four
representative positions shall be distributed to the incorporated and
unincorporated jurisdictions, based on the percent of "population total".
"Population total" shall be, the total number of individuals living within the
incorporated and unincorporated areas of Clallam County, as provided by
the Washington State Office of Financial Management.
Each jurisdiction's percent of the population total shall equate as closely
as possible to the percent of representative members on the OFB, so long
as all jurisdictions and the Port of Port Angeles, herein after referred to as
the Port, have at least one representative each. The Port shall have the
right to no more then one representative. Using the 1998 population total,
as an example, representation would be as follows:
Number of
Jurisdiction Population(%) Representatives on OFB
9
Clallam County 39,675 (60%) 60% of 9 = 4 members
Forks 3,460 (5%) 5% of 9 = 1 member
Port Angeles 18,890 (28%) 28% of 9 = 2 members
Sequim 4,;~75 (7%) 7% of 9 = I member
Port of Port An,qeles (N/A) 1 member
population Total 66,400 (100%) 100% of 9 = 9 members
The Clallam County Board of Commissioners shall appoint the members
of the OFB by the adoption of a resolution.
Criteria For OFB Members
Members of the OFB should posses the technical knowledge necessary
to evaluate project proposals based on their technical and economic
development merit.s. Each OFB member shall have significant
experience in one or more of the following at a senior management or
supervisory level:
· Business finance or banking
· Regional economic planning
· Business recruitment and retention
· Industrial or manufacturing business management
· Civil engineering
Sta.(~erin,q Terms
It is advantageous to assure that all member terms do not expire
simultaneously. Therefore, for 1999, two representative members for
Clallam County, one member for the city of Port Angeles, and the one
member for the city of Sequim shall be appointed until December 31,
2001. For 1999, two. representative members for Clallam County, one
member for the city of Port Angeles, one member for the city of Forks, and
the one representative for the Port shall be appointed until December 31,
2002. All other terms thereafter shall expire two years from the date of
the replacement ~term. There is no limit to the number of terms any board
member may serve.
4.2 Responsibilities of Opportunity Fund Board
The OFB shall be responsible for making recommendations to the Board
of Clallam County Commissioners to approve or deny an application
submitted by an eligible borrower. However, the Clallam County
Treasurer's Office must concur with the OFB on repayment requirements
· for all approved loan packages in order for. the loan to be granted. In the
case of denials,' the Treasurer's Office must accept the decision of the'
OFB, and cannot overturn an application which has been denied.. The
Treasurer's Office may decline to approve a loan application which the
1,0
OFB has approved when such a denial is in the best interest of protecting
the OFP.
It shall be the responsibility of the OFB to make recommendations for
improving the administration of the OFR to the Board of Clallam County
Commissioners.
Board members shall receive a copy of all completed loan and grant
applications submitted by eligible borrowers. Board members shall be
expected to carefully review these materials prior to each meeting of the
OFB. Members shall be expected to attend all OFB meetings scheduled
by the' County Staff Administrator.
4.3 Opportunity Fund Board Meetings
Meetings of the OFB shall be conducted in accordance with the
procedures commonly known as "Robert's Rules of Order." The OFB
shall meet no more than 45 days after a completed application has been
received or an emergency meeting has been called. The Board meetings
may be held during the day or in the evening.
All actions by the Board shall be expressed by motion and/or resolution.
'No motion or resolution shall have any validity unless passed by the
affirmative vote of five members present. All motions and resolutions,
once in final written form, shall be signed as .approved by the chairperson
on behalf of the OFB.
The OFB may transact business via teleconference. Teleconference.
meetings, shall be announced in accordance with state law. A speaker
phone shall be utilized during the public meeting to allow members of.the
public to hearOFB proceedings and; at the discretion of the Chair,
participate in discussions by OFB members.
No representations shall originate from any member of the OFB utilizing
the name of the Opportunity Fund Board to endorse or oppose any issue,
unless a majority of the members of the OFB approve such position.
Quorum
A quorum shall be considered present for a meeting of an OFB meeting
when at least five (5) members are present.
11
Votin,q
The voting on elections, motions, and resolutions shall be by voice vote.
In lieu of voice vote, members may request a roll call vote. A roll call vote
may be requested by any member of the OFB.
Five affirmative votes of OFB members, present at the meeting, are
necessary for the exercise of any power or function of the OFB.
4.4 Conflict of Interest
No officer, employee, or member of the OFB or person related to the
officer, employee, or member of the OFB by blood, marriage, law, or
business arrangement shall receive any benefits resulting from the use of
loan or grant funds, unless the officer, employee, staff member, or OFB
member affected first discloses to the OFB on the public record the
proposed or potential benefit and receives a written determination by the
OFB that the benefit involved is not so substantial as to affect the integrity
of the OFB decision process and the services, of the employee or board
member.
5.0 Staff Capacity
The Clallam County Department of Community Development, herein after
referenced as DCD, shall be the administrator of the Opportunity Fund Program.
The County Staff Administrator shall be designated by the Director of DCD. The
administrative costs associated with the OFP shall be covered by the funds
submitted to the County Treasurer's Office as a result of RCW 82.14.370.
5.1 Clallam County Administrative Staff Responsibilities
The County shall provide adequate staffing to carry out the
responsibilities of administering the OFP. Guidelines and application
materials shall be available to eligible borrowers. The County Staff
Administrator shall review all preliminary applications for the OFP
submitted by eligible borrowers. This review shall determine the
suitability of the proposal for funding under these program guidelines and
judge the overall integrity of the proposal.
The County Staff Administrator is also responsible for ensuring that all the
special conditions required by the OFP are met by each OFP fund
recipient through the period of the loan or grant. The County Staff
Administrator shall 'delineate the federal,' state, and local requirements the
OFP fund recipient must meet in order to receive OFP funding. A
monitoring and tracking system sha'll be established which ensures that
12
both financial responsibilities and programmatic responsibilities will be
met prior to the issuance of any loan or grant.
The County Department of Community Development is accountable for
the proper management of the OFP. The Department of Community
Development and the County Treasurer's Office are responsible for the
prudent management of the funds. This role includes substantial
responsibilities to ensure that federal, state, and local requirements are
met. The resp°nsibilities include determining annually how consistent the
OFB's actions are with the policies and procedures contained in the OFP
plan, and if the loan and grant portfolio meets the standards contained
herein.
6.0 Loan SelectiOn, Approval Process and Servicing
The Clallam County DePartment of Community Development shall develop the
application, for both loans and grants. The application shall describe the basic
eligibility requirements, .and the selection criteria essential to successful
applications.
6.1 Application Review Process - Staff Functions
Staff shall review the applications for program objectives, eligibility
requirements, selection criteria, and loan terms with any potential.
applicant. When a completed' application is submitted, the County Staff
Administrator shall take responsibility for reviewing the application. The
application shall be checked against eligibility criteria,, program
objectives, financial feasibility, selection criteria, environmental
requirements, civil rights requirements, and other program considerations.
The County Staff Administrator may request any additional information not
submitted with the application which the County Staff Administrator deems
necessary for the OFB to review the application.
A decision to approve or deny a loan or grant application has no formal
appeal process. However an eligible borrower may submit a proposal
more then once, but may not submit more than four (4) applications per
year, unless five (5) members of the OFB approve the submittal of
additional applications by an eligible borrower.
Treasurer's Office Services
The Clallam 'County Treasurer's Office shall be responsible for reporting
delinquent loans. Any loan which is: in excess of thirty (30) days past due
muSt be brought to the attention of the County Staff Administrator. In the
13
case that the Treasure's Office learns of adverse circumstances which
may affect the loan, the Treasurer's Office shall notify the County Staff
Administrator.
Staff Administrator Monitorin,q Activities
A system for monitoring the progress of each loan and grant shall be in
place prior to issuance of the loan or grant, and is the responsibility of the
County Staff Administrator. The monitoring system should utilize financial
reports from the Treasurer's Office and gather information on project
completion and performance. Failure to comply with the terms and
conditions of the loan or grant, whether'financial or programmatic, shall
require the County Staff Administrator to initiate corrective action with the
OFP fund recipient. Corrective action plans shall be prepared in writing
and shall be signed by the OFP fund recipient. 'Penalties may be
assessed in acCOrdance with the OFP fund recipient's loan or grant
agreement. Corrective action plans shall become a lega!ly binding part of
the I°an or grant agreement between the recipient and the County.
In the event of serious failure to comply with the terms and conditions of
the program or finanCial default, the County Staff Administrator shall call
an emergency meeting of the OFB to consider remedial steps. Decisions
of the OFB regarding non-complying loans and grants shall be in writing
and appealable to the Board of Clallam County Commissioners.
The County Staff Administrator shall prepare an annual summary
evaluation of the OFP including financial performance, number of jobs
directly created, comparison of projected.and actual benefits,
recommendations to improve operations, the number of activities financed
and their outcomeS, the uses made of interest payments, the achievement
of environmental goals, benefits of the program, and an evaluation of the
program's overall administration.
7.0 Opportunity Fund Administrative Costs
Administrative costs for managing the OFP shall be funded by moneys provided
to the Clallam County Treasurer's Office per RCW 82.14.370. OFP funds shall
not be spent on'the administration of other programs. In those years when OFP
income is to be used for administrative fees, a budget and plan for expending
projected OFP income shall be developed by the County Staff Administrator, and
submitted to the Clallam County Board of Commissioners, prior to adoption.
.8;0 Availability of Loans and Grants
14
Proceeds returned to the funds, pending the approval of new loans or grants,
shall be held with the Clallam County Treasurer's Office. The Treasurer's office
may invest the funds and return all interest income to the fund.
9.0 Other Considerations
The project must comply with all federal, state, county, and city regulations.
15
82
pOR
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Patrick Ibarra, City Manager
SUBJECT: Conference Center Feasibility Study
During the recent goal-setting workshops held with Council, we discussed the conference center
subject and ideas for how best to evaluate its viability. It was decided and is included in the 1999
Goals, that I would bring to Council for their review an approximate fee required to hire a consultant
to conduct a feasibility study (i.e. site, size, financing, etc.).
On March 15 the City Council and the Port met to discuss several items of mutual interest, among
them was the topic of an interagency memo of understanding (MOU) for the possible development
of the Oak Street property. There was much discussion at the meeting regarding discussions
previously held about the possibility of constructing a conference center on the site, as well as other
possible uses. The matter was referred to the City Council Real Estate Committee for consideration
and recommendation to Council.
The Real Estate Committee met on March 25 and discussed the issue, together with the draft MOU's
which had been suggested by both City and Port staff. The Committee, recognizing that the
development or at least resolution of a conference facility concept is a high priority agreed that a
concerted effort to resolve the issue in 1999 is appropriate. However, the Committee did not feel
that a resolution would be assisted at this time through the development of an inter-agency MOU.
Instead, the group agreed that the focused pursuit of a feasibility analysis would be more appropriate.
Such an analysis would include issues such as market feasibility, economic impacts, operational
analysis, community costs and benefits, financial feasibility, location, design and development plans,
financing altematives, marketing strategy and so on. The committee also discussed the likelihood
of attracting a private sector interest and/or public private partnership, and how the whole issue may
be under the review and recommendation to Council by the City's Lodging Tax Advisory Committee
(LTAC).
The Real Estate Committee concluded their review on the issue with the recommendation that an
MOU between the Port and City would not be necessary at this time, favoring the recommendation
for an immediate pursuit of a feasibility study, the result of which may or may not favor use of the
Oak Street site. The cost of a professional consultant study has been estimated at approximately
$7,000, and it is further estimated that such a study could begin this spring. The strategy for
developing the study involves the reassembly and use of the Council's LTAC to review the study
and advise Council. The strategy would potentially include a LTAC recommendation on a specific
project and the necessary steps required to move ahead, ifa project is deemed to be feasible.
83
84
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Patrick Ibarra, City Manager
SUBJECT: Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce
Outlined in the 1999 Economic Development Work Plan presented to Council last December, Tim
and I identified Goal 4: Leverage economic development resources by collaborating with EDC, Port
and other agencies to maximize opportunities. Under this goal we listed several agencies directly
involved with economic development, one of which is the Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce.
As an endeavor to raise the exposure of Port Angeles in the Greater Seattle area and begin building
effective relationships with businesses in that area, a membership in the Greater Seattle Chamber
of Commerce was sought. The membership fee of $350 per year should prove to be a prudent
investment in our economic development efforts.
Attached is a brochure outlining the benefits associated with joining the organization. The items
listed under the Exposure category: Business to Business EXPO, Networking events, Membership
and Business Directory, Interact Listing, Referrals, and Newsletter will be most beneficial to our
community. Tim and I visited the Business to Business EXPO on Tuesday, March 30, and obtained
several materials that will assist us as we prepare our marketing plan.
Joining this organization combined with other strategies being undertaken to more aggressively
promote Port Angeles as a site to relocate a business, increases the likelihood of our success in
business recruitment.
G:\EXCHANGE\CNCLPKT~CTYMGR\SEATTLEC.MBR
86
88
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 6, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Patrick Ibarra, City Manager
SUBJECT: Personnel Justification - Firefighter
Outlined in the 1999 Goals recently revised by City Council is:
A. Improve the Financial Stability of Port Angeles
4. Minimize any potential property tax increase by developing revenue options
and reviewing all vacant positions for optimal efficient to ensure cost
effective City operations and service delivery.
As such, I will begin presenting information relating to replacing any vacancies in the City's labor
force. The purpose of this and future memo(s) will be to aptly describe the reasons for undertaking
the recruitment process to replace the position. I have requested Bruce Becker, and Bob Coons
prepare a summary accordingly.
Each firefighter is scheduled on a 24-hour shift basis. There are three shifts providing coverage
seven days a week, 24-hours each day. Each shift is comprised of six firefighters with a minimum
manpower requirement of four stipulated in the collective bargaining agreement.
As a result of the minimum manpower requirements, Kelly time (hour reductions), floating holidays,
and vacation leave, one FTE (Full-Time Equivalent) is required for every three FTE positions. A
vacancy results in additional work assignments for others on that shift and does create some
mandatory overtime to insure proper coverage. If this practice continues over an extended period
of time, it may create additional concerns of safety, overtime usage, coverage and such.
In addition to the smaller squad size, there are other impacts as well such as use of vehicles. The
smaller squad requires the use of the Engine truck more. This is the result of when five firefighters
are scheduled, only the Medic Unit and the small pick-up truck respond to medical emergencies.
However, when only four are on duty it is necessary to utilize the Engine instead of the pick-up
truck, so there are sufficient staff available to respond to other emergency situations while on medic
runs. This creates unnecessary wear and tear on the engine truck.
An eligible list currently lists from which to hire and the next Fire Training Academy begins in late
April. Therefore, if Council concurs with staff's recommendation to pursue the replacement of the
position an offered can be tendered immediately and a candidate be placed in the Academy.
G:\EXCHANGE\CNCLPKT~CTYMGR~POS JUS TF~FFIGHTER 399
90
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
D^TE: April 6, 1999
To: M^YOP, BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Resolution Revising the City's Policy for Pa,vrnent of Expenses at Certain City
Functions
Attached is a draft resolution that would revise the City's policy for payment of expenses at certain
City functions. You will see that the original resolution would be broadened in several significant
respects:
1. The term "minimal expenses" and the $250 limitation on such expenses would be deleted.
2. The current resolution provides for periodic functions such as award ceremonies and employee
breakfasts in which all levels and departments of City government participate. The new resolution
would also include special functions such as dedication and special recognition ceremonies, in which
the general public and all levels of City government would participate.
By making these changes to the resolution, expenditures such as the service award luncheons and
the memorial plaque receptions would be covered. Also, it would allow for enough flexibility to
include certain retirement dinner expenses.
This is informational only at this time and depending upon Council's preference, it can be added to
the April 20 meeting agenda.
Attachment
G:\EXCHANGE\CNCLPKT~ATTRNY~040699.03
RESOLUTION NO. ~. ~ o~... -99
ARESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
~.~rd:~,.:_~ a revising the City's policy for payment of m:.n~ma! expenses at certain City
functions and amending Resolution No. 19-91.
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for City government to function in an
environment of open communication and positive morale among all levels and
departments; and
WHEREAS, it is also in the public interest for City government to sponsor and
participate in public dedication, ceremonial, and special recognition events in order to
commemorate or recognize a particularly noteworthy public event or project or the
contributions of a particularly noteworthy citizen, leader, or City official; and
WHEREAS, such open communication and positive morale are fostered and
improved by periodic functions such as award ceremonies, employee breakfasts, and
related events, in which all levels and departments of City government participate in
organizing, assisting and attending; and
WHEREAS, such special events, projects, and contributions are fostered and
encouraged by formal recognition and award ceremonies and related events, in which the
general public and all levels of City government participate; and
WHEREAS, it is a management prerogative of City government to sponsor
such functions; and
WHEREAS, in consideration of the significant benefit to City government i-n-
improved cc. mm-anicat:.c.n an~ mc. ra!c. that results from such functions, it is a reasonable and
economically sound policy for City funds to be spent as necessary to pay min:.mal expenses
for such functions, provided that a :pc.c:.fic.~ .... : .......... ~:* .... ~:--:~ :~ ~^' ...... '~'~
such funds are available in the City budget;
02
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Port Angeles as follows:
Section 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to spend City funds at
periodic functions, such as award ceremonies, employee breakfasts, and related events,
involving all levels and departments of City government in ..... ;-~*; .....:~* ......~
~, and at special functions, such as dedication, ceremonial, and special
recognition events, involving the general public and all levels of City_ government,
provided that such City funds shall have ~'~- *"'~-~*~ ~ ~1-,~1 ~-I- ...... ,4 ~"}trth nth ~.
f'a ........ are available in the annual budget.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting
of said Council held on the __ day of April, 1999.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
r99am.04
93
94
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
March 10, 1999
7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Fred Hewins, Dean Reed, Mary Craver, Bob King
Members Excused: Linda Nutter
Staff Present: Brad Collins, David Sawyer, Trenia Funston
Public Present: John Watson
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Reed moved to approve the March 3, 1999, special meeting minutes as
submitted. The motion was seconded by Commissioner King and passed 4-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CUP 99-03 - WATSON, 502 East Front
Street: Request to place an off-site advertising sign on property located in the
Commercial Arterial zone.
Senior Planner reviewed the Planning Department's staff report recommending approval of
the conditional use permit as proposed with conditions. Chair Craver opened the public
hearing.
John Watson, 533 Vashon Street, did not speak but was present for questions.
There being no questions or further testimony, Chair Craver closed the public hearing.
Commissioner King moved to approve the conditional use permit with the following
conditions, citing the following findings and conclusions:
1. This conditional use permit is approved for an off-premise sign as identified in
Attachment A of the Planning Department's Staff Report for CLIP 99-03 dated March
10, 1999..
2. The proposed sign shall be located above the existing retaining wall, located entirely
on private property and shall not block any sight distance (see Attachment C for
Planning Department Staff Report for CLIP 99-03, dated March 10, 1999).
95
Planning Commission Minutes
March 10, 1999
Page 2
Based on information provided in the March 10, 1999, Staff Report for CUP 99-03
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port
Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. The applicant, John Watson, submitted the subject application to the City on January
26, 1999 (see Attachment A of the Planning Department Staff Report for CUP 99-03,
dated March 10, 1999).
2. The owner of the property, Jim Clark, authorized the subject application (see
Attachment A of the Planning Department Staff Report for CUP 99-03, dated March
10, 1999).
3. A Determination of Completeness was published on January 27, 1999. Legal
publication appeared in the Peninsula Daily News on February 7, 1999. The
associated public comment period ended on February 20, 1999, with no written or
verbal comments received.
4. The application is to construct a 3' high by 8' wide off-premise sign in the CA zone.
5. A Determination of Non Significance (DNS//834) was issued for this proposal on
February 19, 1999 (see Attachment B of the Planning Department Staff Report for
CUP 99-03, dated March 10, 1999)..
6. The subject property is zoned Commercial, Arterial (CA).
7. Off-premise signs are conditionally permitted in the CA zone.
8. The subject property is currently developed with a single-family residence.
9. The subject property contains 50' of arterial street frontage.
10. The subject property is allowed 75 square feet of freestanding sign area.
11. The proposed sign is single-sided and contains 24 square feet.
12. The subject site is located in the City's North Central Planning Area at the southeast
comer of Vine Street and Front Street. The property contains approximately 7,000
square feet of land developed with a single-family residence. The property is
elevated approximately 20' from the Front Street grade and there are no other signs
located on the subject property.
13. The City Public Works Department requested the sign be located above the existing
retaining wall, located entirely on private property and shall not block any sight
distance (see Attachment C of the Planning Department Staff Report for CUP 99-03,
dated March 10, 1999).
96
Planning Commission Minutes
March 1 O, 1999
Page 3
Conclusions:
Based on information provided in the Planning Department Staff Report for CUP 99-03,
dated March 10, 1999, including all of the information in the public record file, comments,
and information presented during the public hearing, and the Planning Commission's
discussion and deliberation, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby
concludes that:
A. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Policies Al-2 is relevant to the proposed
project.
B. As conditioned, the proposed use is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan
including but not limited to Land Use Element Policies Al-2.
C. The proposed use is consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance and specific
development and sign standards for CA zone.
D. As conditioned, the proposal is in the public interest.
E. The low profile of the sign should reduce any negative impacts of the sign on the
aesthetic qualities of the existing residential use of the site.
Commissioner Hewins seconded the motion, which passed 4 - 0.
Commissioner Reed complimented the applicant on the orderly appearance of the proposed
sign area.
STREET VACATION PETITION - STV 99-01 - CITY/DAVIS; "P"
Street south of Milwaukee Drive. A petition to exchange City right-of-way.
Planner Sawyer reviewed the Planning Department' staff report recommending approval of
the vacation of right-of-way as proposed which will enable the acquisition of needed right-
of-way in another area. Chair Craver opened the public hearing.
Trenia Funston, Engineering Technician, City Public Works Department, was present for
questions. She responded that the vacation of property will allow the acquisition of property
south of Mr. Davis' property to be used to continue the development of Sixteenth Street in
this area.
There being no further questions or testimony, Chair Craver closed the public heating.
Commissioner Reed moved to recommend that the City Council approve the vacation
as proposed citing the following findings and conclusions:
97
Planning Commission Minutes
March 10, 1999
Page 4
1. The applicant for the requested vacation is City of Port Angeles/Mr. Davis, the
application/petition is attached as Attachment A of the March 10, 1999, Planning
Department Staff Report for STV 99-01.
2. The requested vacation is for the westerly 40' of "P" Street lying southerly of the
south margin of Milwaukee Drive right-of-way and abutting the east property line of
Suburban Lot 84 to the northerly margin of 16th Street right-of-way identified in
Attachment A of the March 10, 1999, Planning Department Staff Report for STV 99-
01.
3. The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from threshold determination and
Environmental Impact Statement requirements per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the
Washington Administrative Code which states "(2) Other minor new construction.
The following types of construction shall be exempt... (h) The vacation of streets or
roads."
4. The Public Works Department is proposing this vacation, the vacated street area will
be used as part ora land swap with the adjacent property owner, Mr. Davis, which
will result in a reconfiguration of the 16th Street and Milwaukee Drive intersection
to a 90° design.
5. The City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element Policy B 11 reads - "New
arterial streets, local access streets, and alleys should be designed and constructed
to conform to the Statewide National Functional Classification System for Federal
Aid Systems, WSDOT, and Transportation Improvement Board minimum design
standards and standards as adopted by the City."
6. Section 3B.120B of the City's Department of Public Works Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines states: "Street intersections shall be laid out so as to
intersect as nearly as possible at right angles... For safe design, the following types
of intersection features should be avoided: . . . 2. "Y" type intersections where
streets meet at acute angles (less than 75 degrees)."
7. The existing 16th Street and Milwaukee Drive ROWs intersect at a 50° angle.
Conclusions:
A. The Comprehensive Plan Transportation Policy B 11 directly relates to the proposed
vacation.
B. Traffic patterns in the area will not be effected by this vacation.
C. The reconfiguration of the intersection to a 90° design will enhance the public health,
safety or welfare.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner King and passed 4 - 0.
98
Planning Commission Minutes
March 10, 1999
Page 5
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None.
STAFF REPORTS
Staff noted that the Rayonier Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be reheard at
the April 14 meeting.
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
None
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Brad Collins, Secretary Mary Craver, Chair
PREPARED BY: S. Roberds
99
100
UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Port Angeles, Washington
March 15, 1999
I. Call to Order:
Vice Chairman Michalczik called the meeting to order at 2:05 p.m. D r aft
II. Roll Call:
Members Present: Councilmen Doyle and Williams [2:16], Bill Myers and Joe
Michalczik.
Members Absent: Councilman Campbell.
Staff Present: J. Pittis, B. Titus, C. Knutson, C. Hagar, and D. Sawyer.
III. Approval of Minutes:
Councilman Doyle moved to approve the minutes of the February 8, 1999, meeting. Bill M.yer
seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
IV. Discussion Items:
A. Marine Drive Bluff Meetings Update
At Mr. Michalcziks's request, Senior Planner Sawyer reviewed the information contained in the
packet. There has been a series of four meetings over the past two months for property owners
located along the top and bottom of the marine bluffbetween Tumwater and Hill Streets. At the first
meeting, residents discussed issues impacting their property. At the second meeting, a geotechnical
engineer led discussion on marine bluffs in general and staff provided handouts regarding what to
watch for during and after storms. Jim Johannesen, a coastal geological engineer, gave a presentation
and responded to questions at the third meeting. At the fourth meeting, the residents decided to send
out letters specifically asking other property owners if they would be willing to participate in a
cooperative effort to fund a geotechnical study of the bluff. Mr. Mike Dean will lead this effort and
staff will provide him with a property owner mailing list to aid in this endeavor. It is staff' s intent to
relinquish its role as facilitator and let the group continue on its own.
Mr. Sawyer responded to questions and provided clarification.
No action was taken. A report will also be provided to the City Council.
B. Wholesale Water Agreement with PUD
Public Works Director Pittis reviewed the information contained in the packet. Staff recommends
extending the Wholesale Water Agreement to December 1999, to allow time to conduct a cost of
service study for the water utility. Should the results of that study prove a rate increase to be
necessary, it is best to implement that increase during the winter months when consumption is lower.
Director Pittis also noted that extending the contract to December 1999, would allow for a better
opportunity to know what will be occurring regarding the issues of regional area of water supply,
dam removal, etc. Discussion ensued, and Director Pittis responded to questions and provided
additional clarification.
Bill Myer moved to recommend the City Council approve the extension of the wholesale water
agreement with the PUD with the same terms and conditions to December 31, 1999.
1
Utility Advisory Committee
March 15, 1999
Councilman Doyle seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
C. Extension of lnterlocal Agreement with Jefferson County for Use of Landfill
Director Pittis reviewed the information contained in the packet. He stated it is hoped that our
cooperation with Jefferson County will be remembered in the future, if the City goes to regional long
hauling. Brief discussion followed regarding various methods of disposing of garbage after the
landfill closes. Director Pittis and Deputy Director Titus responded to questions and provided
clarification.
Councilman Doyle moved to recommend the City Council extend the Interlocai Agreement
with Jefferson County until April 29, 1999. Councilman Williams seconded the motion, which
carried unanimously.
D. Interlocal Agreement with Port of Port Angeles for Wildlife Management
Director Pittis reviewed and explained the information contained in the packet. He reminded the
Committee that the City had hired the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to perform a wildlife
assessment of the landfill and airport. Part of that report included an outline of a Wildlife
Management Plan. The assessment describes and analyzes the risks, and this was the basis for
submitting a report to the county which demonstrated there is no bird/aircraft hazard relating to the
landfill's proximity to the airport.
The Wildlife Management Plan is the step which ensures that the demonstration continues forward.
This document describes numerous ways to address and deal with migratory birds, starlings, rodents,
etc. It describes the responsibilities of the Port personnel and the City. The Plan also establishes a
committee which will periodically review the program, assesses the available information, and makes
necessary correction to address the issues of wildlife.
Director Pittis then reviewed the necessary steps to reach implementation of the Plan and stated staff
is pleased with the document. Discussion followed and Director Pittis responded to questions.
Attorney Knutson explained that the FAA did not have legal control over the City's landfill. The
County issued the City it's permit because the USDA developed this plan and assessment. As long
as the City follows the Plan, the landfill is legal and the City can continue to operate it as long as
necessary, unless the law is changed. Currently, the City has satisfied the County, Department of
Ecology, and Environmental Protection Act regulations and there is no legal hold for the FAA over
the landfill. Further discussion ensued.
Councilman Doyle moved to concur with the Wildlife Management Plan and the Interlocal
Agreement with the Port to implement the plan as presented and forward it to City Council
upon its review and approval by the Port. Bill Myer seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
E. Letter to Congressional Delegation Supporting Private Use Legislation
Deputy Director of Utility Services Titus reviewed the information contained in the packet. Director
Pittis reminded the Committee that several years ago, there was some effort in Congress to eliminate
tax exempt financing for wastewater and water facilities. This is another attempt. Deputy Director
Titus explained that certain parts of the country are almost exclusively private power, and have been
after public power for years. Discussion ensued and Mr. Titus responded to questions and provided
clarification. He stated that if the delegation did not support private use legislation, the City's costs
-2-
Utility Advisory Committee
March 15, 1999
would be increased not only for utilities but general city government costs.
Following further limited discussion, Councilman Doyle moved to recommend the City Council
approve sending the letters to the congressional delegation supporting lt.R. 721 and S. 386.
Bill Myers seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
F. Verbal Report on Regional Water and Electrical Issues
Director Pittis stated CH2M Hill has been commissioned to perform a water resource review and
study. It has been updated to reflect the possibilities based on whether one or both dams are
removed, and how this might relate to water supplies. Discussions were then held between the City
and the PUD to consider the value of the study as a joint City/PUD project, to look at water supply
collectively rather than independently. At the same time, the City had a brief discussion with the
Tribe regarding similar issues. The Tribe is developing a list of its issues, which will be forwarded
to the City.
One of the Tribe's ideas was to use the Ranney well water to augment the flow of the river for fish
uses, reducing the highly turbid river flows during dam removal with the water from the Ranney well.
This would mean the City would use the industrial line and place a treatment plant along it, or build
another Ranney well, etc.
Staffis hoping to obtain additional information which can be useful in developing a regional strategy
that would satisfy the PUD, City, Tribe, and any other entity seeking to use water from the regional
system. This will be difficult but worthwhile project. Director Pittis distributed Ennis Creek
Cooperation, Vision of the Future, which is a draft vision statement for potential use of the Rayonier
mill site and water facilities. He stated this is just a possible approach to this issue.
Councilman Williams stated he attended Science, Technology and Manufacturing Association Open
House. One of the presentations put on by a group of individuals, showed how.to connect the
downtown and all the water resources. East of Ennis Creek was a golf course and a tribal cultural
center, west of the creek was offices and marinas, and the boat haven was turned into heavy industrial
shipping. Discussion followed.
Director Pittis distributed maps showing the Port Angeles water supply system and described the
various water service lines. He stated that staff hoped to expand the scope of the study being
performed by CH2M Hill to discover what would be necessary in order to connect a new treatment
plant to the current water system, and how much it would cost to accomplish. This expanded study
would provide the information necessary to bring to the PUD Commissioners and City Council so
they can make a decision on the issue.
The PUD, City, Tribe, etc., collectively, can agree on a regional water supply, then permission can
be sought from the federal authorities to carry out the new program. Senator Gorton has indicated
he would be supportive of reimbursing the City for some of its costs relative to protecting its own
interests.
Councilman Doyle stated that during the National League of Cities Conference, Council members met
with Patty Murray's and Slate Gorton's representatives, as well as Congressman Dicks.
.Congressman Dicks informed that Secretary of the Interior Babbitt wishes to ensure there is a plan
in place before money is paid out for the purchase of the dams. He felt the federal government
wanted to ensure they would have no liability regarding the dams, once they were purchased.
Discussion ensued and Joe Michalczik felt that dam removal would be harmful to Port Angeles due
3
Utility Advisory Committee
March 15, 1999
to the length of time it would take to accomplish flow down. Director Pittis described what he
thought would happen if the dams were removed and what the Department of Health would mandate
regarding water sampling, and explained why it was beneficial to the City to work in cooperation with
the PUD and Tribe and on this issue.
Councilman Doyle noted that the Elwha dam removal has been an issue for several years, but the
listing of the salmon is going to affect everyone. Many entities will be seeking federal or state funds
and working with other agencies will give the City its best chance of obtaining support for a water
treatment system. Director Pittis spoke briefly on the possibility of reusing water in the future.
Further discussion followed, and Joe Michalczik expressed concern over maintaining water quality
and cost of water delivery. Director Pittis stated this issue will be returned to the UAC after
CH2M Hill has been approached regarding adjusting the scope of work.
VI. Information Only Items
A. Lockbox Memo to Customers
Finance Director Godbey reminded the Committee that the City Council had approved a contract with
Lockbox, Inc. about one year ago. Lockbox will process and deposit payments, then electronically
upload the information to the City's computer system. This will free up the processing of
approximately 400 payments per month. There was a delay in implementing the program as the
software was ensuring all programs were Y2K compliant. The program is currently being tested and
it is hoped actual service will begin shortly. Director Godbey responded to questions and provided
additional clarification on the program.
No action was taken.
VI. Next Meeting:
The next meeting will be April 12, 1999, at 3:00 p.m.
VII. Adjournment:
The meeting adjourned at 3:55 p.m.
Chairman Deputy City Clerk
4
104
~i ii ii iii ii ii 'ii
i ...... ! ..... F-'-'i ...... i-~'--"-'-'~ ............ i ....... i ...... i"'-'i ............. i ...... i ...... ! ....... i ...... i ...... i ...... F'"i ..... i ..... F'"-'i ...... '" ....... ! ..... i ....... i ...... i'aii-~
....... ] .............................................. ~' ........................................................... i .................. " ............ ~ ....... F'----"--T---T. :.o o 0
...... i ...... t ............ Y'--'~'-'"'t ............ .?-'-"T'""i"'-"1 ...... 1 ....... i ...... ! ...... i ....... i ...... i ...... i ............. i ...... i"'---T'--'-'i ............ T'"i ol'oiS'i'&';8 ......
~ ....... i ...... ?! ....... i .... i'""T---'-.'::--i ...... i-'--"! ....... i ...... i ...... i ...... i ...... i ...... i ...... ...t-? ...... ! ...... r""~ ....... !'""T-F-! ..... ! '8-Fa;18Ta;!8 ......
...... i ...... i"'"'1 ....... i ..... r'--'i ....... F-"-i ...... i ...... i-'--'-'i ...... i ...... i ....... i ...... i ...... i ...... t"--'-! ..... i ...... i ....... i ...... i ...... i"--"; ...... i ...... F'"'; ....... i -'i ..... i ....... FS-i-STST6Ta;i ......
,-i i. i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
...... i ...... ! ...... ~ .......................................... ! ............................... 1--'--'i ...... i ...... ?'"-'i ...... i ...... ! ............................... ~"&TSTS'.?'&'i'&-i .......
, i i i r i :: [ ..... ...... ....... ..... ....... ...... ..... F-'"i ~ ....... ....... i i i i i i i F"'i ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... ...... ~"-'i ! i--'--'t"--"F"-i-'-"-t-'---'i ...... ...... ....... 8'i'8i~-i'~-!'8i ......
~o -~-~ M ~-,-~-.4'-~+'h-}-~:"~;'~-'M-'m':"¢:"¢~--~'}-'&-:"h:-q-T~:-';~:-~T~-i'~ '-~i'°-!";~-:-'/S'-i~+-h*-'O:'~' -~ ~-
~ ...................... ~.~ .... I
/
-~ ...... ~ ....... ~ .................. t---~ ............ t-'-~~ .................. ~ ................... ~ ....... ~ ............................ ~ .... ~ .... ~ ...... ~ ....... ~ ...... F----'~'-'i ...... { ..... ~ ............. { ............ ~ ...... i'~
. . ~, , ~ ~. ~.~, . , . ~' . : ,~ : . , , :~ -- ~ , ~, ~ ,~
105