HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 04/20/2004 AGENDA
'GELES CITY COUNCIL MEETING
W A S H I N G T O N, U. S.A. 321 EAST FIFTH STREET
April 20, 2004
REGULAR MEETING - 6:00 p.na.
A. CALL TO ORDER - Regular Meeting (6:00 p.m.)
ROLL CALL -
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -
PUBLIC CEREMONIES, PRESENTATIONS I [
AND PROCLAMATIONS
Public Works Week Proclamation 1 Read & Present Proclamation
B. WORK SESSION
C. LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON THIS OR FUTURE AGENDAS (By Council, Stq~or Public) AN])
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA (This is the opportunity for members of the public to
speak to the City Council about anything not on the agenda, please keep comments to 5-10 minutes.)
D. FINANCE
1. Updated Agreement between the City and Authorize Mayor to Sigm Agreement
Nine Public Safety Agencies for PenCom
Dispatch and Computer Records Services
E. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City Council Minutes of April 6, 2004 regular Approve Consent Agenda
meeting
2. Expenditure Approval List - April 9, 2004 -
$475,007.74
F. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
G. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS
1. Ordinance Revision re: Port Angeles Fine Art Adopt Ordinance
Center Use Regulations permitting use of
alcohol at selected events.
2. Ordinance Amendment: Port Angeles Fine Adopt Ordinance
Art Center Use Fees
H. RESOLUTIONS
1. Resolution in Support of Kalakala Alliance Pass Resolution
Foundation
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
April 20, 2004 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - 1
I. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
J. PUBLIC HEARINGS - QUASI-JUDICIAL
(7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter)
K. PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER
(7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter) Adopt Ordinance
1. DeFrang STV 03-05: Wolcott Street between 81
4th Street and 4/5 Alley Adopt Ordinance
2. Parking Ordinance: Port Angeles Municipal 99
Code (PAMC) Chapter 14.40 Revisions
L. INFORMATION
1. City Manager's Reports: none
2. Clallam County Humane Society Report - March 31, 2004 (Page 115)
3. Planning Commission Minutes - March 24, 2004 (Page 119)
4. Department of Community Development Monthly Reports - March 2004 (Page 123)
5. Public Works Department Monthly Report (Page 125)
M. EXECUTIVE SESSION (As needed and determined by City Attorney)
N. ADJOURNMENT
G:\CNCLPKTk&GENDA~pr 20 '04 age.wpd
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings are set by the City Council in order to meet legal requirements pertaining to matters such as, land use permit applications, proposed
amendments to City land use regulations, zoning changes, annexations. In addition, the City Council may set a public hearing in order to receive
public input pdor to making decisions which im pact the citizens. Certain matters may be controversial, and the City Council may choose to seek
public opinion through the public hearing process.
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
April 20, 2004 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - 2
poRTANGELES CITY COUNCIL MEETING
WASHINGTON, U. S. a.
April 20, 2004
I. CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING:
II. ROLL CALL:
Members Present:
Mayor Headrick
Councilmember Braun
Councilmember Erickson
Councilmember Munro
Councilmember Pittis
Councilmember Rogers
Councilmember Williams
Staff Present:
/~~ Manager ~
Attorney Dickson
Clerk Upton
B. Collins
M. Connelly
G. Cutler
D. McKeen
Y. Ziomkowski
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Led by: t~/1_ _t~. ~qa),
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Attendance Roster
DATE OF MEETING: April 20, 2004
LOCATION: City_ Council Chambers
City of Port Angeles
ORTANGELE$ Ordinance/Resolution Distribution List
WASHINGTON, U. S. A.
City Council Meeting of April 20, 2004
Resolution No.
City Manager
City Atty. (1)
Planning
Deputy Clerk
Perso~el
Cust. Svcs.
Fin~ce
D~./M~r.
Police Dept.
Fire Dept.
Light Dept.
Parks&Rec.
MRSC (1)
Extra Co~ies
TOT~
PROCLAMATION
NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK
MAY 16 - 22, 2004
WHEREAS, public works services provided in our community are an integral part of our
citizens' everyday lives; and
WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient
operation of public works systems and programs such as electrical, water,
sewer, streets, fleet management, solid waste collection and disposal', snow
removal and engineering services; and
WHEREAS, the health, safety, and comfort of this ~ommunity greatly depends on public
works facilities and services: and
WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning,
design, and construction is vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill of its
public works employees; and
WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff the Public
Works & Utilities Department is materially influenced by the public's attitude
and understanding of the importance of the work these people perform;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PORT ANGELES in consideration of the above findings to declare:
The week of May 16th through May 22nd, 2004 shall be knoWn as "NATIONAL PUBLIC
WORKS WEEK." I urge all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with
the issues involved in providing our public works services and to recognize the
contributions that public works and utilities employees make every day to our health,
safety, and comfort.
Apr'il 20, 2004
Richard A. Headrick, Mayor
2
I RTANGELE5
WASHINGTON,
I CITY COUNCIL MEMO
l)nT~.: APRIL 20, 2004
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: NAOMI RIGG1N$, COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER
SUBJECT: UPDATED AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND 9 PUBLIC SAFETY AGENCIES FOR
PENCOM DISPATCH AND COMPUTER RECORDS SERVICES
ISummary.: PenCom'was established under RCW 39.34 permitting interlocal agreements between
agencies for mutual benefit. The City has maintained agreements with Clallam County, the City of
Sequim, Lower Elwha and Quileute Tribes, Fire Districts 2, 3, 4, 5, and Olympic National Park providing
public safety dispatch services. The last agreement expired at the end of 2003. The updated agreement
continues to provide the mechanism whereby PenCom member agencies obtain their law enforcement,
fire and emergency medical service dispatching and some computer services by contracting with the City,
Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
Background / Analysis:
The process of crafting an updated agreement began in the spring of 2003. This agreement contains the
following changes from the prior document: 1) Previously, each agency had a separate though similar
agreement with the City. This document eliminates separate contracts and is agreed to by all participating
agencies, 2) The new agreement continues from year to year unless a change is agreed to by all agencies.
Previously, the agreements expired every 5 years, 3) Voting, quorums, and special committees were
added or clarified, and 4) Documents that are subject to change, such as contact names and the funding
formula, were attached as exhibits so they could be modified without changing the entire agreement.
The most significant change is in PenCom's funding formula. A committee was appointed by the
PenCom Advisory Board to recommend an equitable funding formula for the two areas of service, law
enforcement and fire/EMS. The recommendation of the committee was accepted and incorporated into
this document.
~a~nent
M614
3
PENINSULA COMMUNICATIONS (PENCOM)
DISPATCH AND COMPUTER RECORDS SERVICE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between thc City of Port Angeles,
(hereinafter referred to as "the City"), and Clallam County, City of Sequim, Clallam
County Rural Fire Protection Districts 2, 3 4 and 5, Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, Quileute
Tribe, and National Park Service (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Members" and
individually as "Member").
WITNESSETH THAT:
1. WHEREAS, both the City and Members agree that 24 hour access to emergency
communications service is essential for protecting life and property of the public they serve;
and
2. WHEREAS, the participating jurisdictions have previously entered into
interlocal agreements with the City for police, fire and emergency medical dispatching,
related computer services, and management of the Clallam County Enhanced 9-1-1
system provided by Peninsula Communications (hereinafter referred to as "PenCom"), a
division of the City of Port Angeles Police Department; and
3. WHEREAS, it is the goal of PenCom to serve Members by providing these
services on an equitable cost sharing basis for each Member contracting for said services;
and
4. WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 RCW permits the City and Members to make
official use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other governmental
entities on a basis of mutual advantage; and
5. WHEREAS, the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act, 31 U.S.C. 6305
(1982) states that an executive agency of the United States government shall use cooperative
agreement as the legal instrument reflecting the relationship between the United States and a
state, local government, or other recipient when the principal purpose of the relationship is
to transfer a thing of value to the state, local govemment, or other recipient to carry out a
public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States, and where
substantial involvement is expected between the executive agency and the state, local
government' or other recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated in the
agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing as a basis for cooperative
agreements and assistance between the parties hereto in their mutually compatible
objectives, the parties agree as follows:
PURPOSE.
It is the purpose of this Agreement to provide a mechanism whereby Members may
obtain their law enforcement, fire and emergency medical service dispatching, and
certain computer records services by contracting said services from PenCom and to
set forth the powers, rights and responsibilities of the parties to this agreement.
ADVISORY BOARD.
A. Voting.
The City and Members hereto agree that the PenCom Advisory Board (hereinafter
referred to as the "Board") shall be the operations and policy recommending body
for PenCom. The Board shall be composed ora representative from the City and
each Member. The City and all Members shall each have one vote. Decisions
reached by the Board shall be reached by a simple majority vote. A quorum for the
transaction of business will be established when at least 5 l% of the Members are
present.
B. The Board may establish by-laws consistent with this Agreement.
C. The Board shall have the authority to:
1. Make recommendations for the operation of PenCom in accordance with
industry standards.
2. Recommend approval of the joining herein of any other agency eligible
to participate.
3. Recommend additional services provided to each Member.
4. Review the financial contributions of the parties hereto and recommend
adjustments to if the Board finds that any of the Members is beating an
inequitable share of PenCom's costs.
5. Establish committees for specific purposes at the pleasure of and with
oversight provided by the Board. These sub-groups of the Board will be
strictly advis, 0ry in nature.
a) These committees may develop priorities, policies, procedures
and standards for recommendation to the Communications Manager
and may review requests for additional PenCom services and
determine if such services should be provided. If such requests are
approved by a simple majority of the committee, the Board shall be
provided with the recommendation for approval.
b) The specific purpose and membership of the committees will be
determined by the Board.
2
III. PERSONNEL.
A. The City shall employ and assign a Communications Manager who shall
manage the day-to-day operations of PenCom. The Communications Manager
shall be responsible to the City of Port Angeles Chief of Police for staffing and
direction of all personnel employed by PenCom, for budget preparation and
management and for the efficient operation of PenCom including the development
of operating policies and procedures, scheduling, and supervision. The
Communications Manager will act as a liaison with Members and will maintain
records and statistics of the OPeration of PenCom for administrative and f'mancial
purposes. The Communications Manager shall, upon the request of any Member,
furnish a monthly report of PenCom's activities and of each Member's utilization
of PenCom.
The Communications Manager is designated the County Enhanced 9-1-1
Coordinator by Clallam County resolution and has the responsibility for the
operation and upgrade of the system. The Communications Manager will
cooperate and coordinate with Clallam County and the Washington State E9-1-1
Program Office to manage the Enhanced 9-1-1 system and budget.
The Communications Manager shall act as Chair of the Advisory Board.
B. Other personnel of PenC°m shall include dispatchers, supervisors and a
warrant entry clerk.
C. All personnel of PenCom,"including the Communications Manager, shall be
employees of the Port Angeles Police Department. They shall be subject to all
rules and regulations pertaining to Port Angeles Police Department employees,
except as modified by collective bargaining agreements with the City. The City
shall be responsible for collective bargaining and final contract ratification.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed so as to render any employee of
PenCom or the Advisory Board to be an employee of any of the other agencies
listed as signators thereto.
IV, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL.
A. Consistent with the terms of this Agreement, the Port Angeles City Manager
shall have general supervision over the administration of PenCom and all other
duties and powers of the City's chief executive officer as set forth in RCW
35A. 13.080.
B. Consistent with the terms of this Agreement, the Port Angeles City Council
shall be the legislative body having ultimate authority over PenCom with those
powers set forth in RCW 35A.11.020.
3
V. JOINING OF OTHER MEMBERS
Other governmental bodies or emergency service providers within Clallam County
may be added to this Agreement in accordance with the following:
A. Each such agency must agree, in accordance with the applicable laws of the
State of Washington, to be bound in all respects, including bearing a proportional
share of the capital and annual costs to operate PenCom.
B. The City shall charge each agency a fee for services according to Exhibit A of
this Agreement.
C. The City may, upon recommendation by the Board, charge each new agency for
costs incurred for enhancements to equipment, software or hardware, or expansion
of buildings or other expenses necessary to provide services for the new Member.
I). Upon approval of the joining of a new agency hereto, the Communications
Manager shall recompute the financial contributions of the various Members of
PenCom and shall inform them of their adjusted contribution for the current
calendar year.
VI. DURATION, TERMINATION AND REMEDIES.
This Agreement shall be in effect the 1st day of January, 2004 and shall be perpetual
and continue year-to-year; provided, however, 1) any participating Member may
terminate PenCom services upon providing written notice to the City not later than
June 30 of any year for withdrawal effective January 1 of the following calendar
year; and 2) PenCom may be dissolved upon mutual agreement of all participating
Members.
If a participating Member withdraws from this Agreement but fails to provide
necessary notice to the City, the parties agree that the liquidated damages for such
action shall be not less than the withdrawing Member's share of PenCom's annual
operating costs for the next fiscal year as determined by the funding formula for the
withdrawing member.
VII. FINANCES.
A. All expenses incurred by PenCom shall be paid by the City and shared equitably
by the City and all other Members in accordance with this Agreement.
B. It shall be the responsibility of the Communications Manager to prepare an
annual budget to include all necessary and required expenditures and anticipated
revenues. The budget shall be reviewed by the Board, and, with its
recommendation, submitted to the Port Angeles City Council for approval. Upon
request of any Member, the Communications Manager shall appear before that
Member's legislative body regarding the annual budget or financial contributions.
4
C. The funding structure of this Agreement may be subject to review by the
PenCom Advisory Board if a review is requested by at least one participating
Member.
D. The parties to this Agreement may, on behalf of PenCom, accept girls and
donations in recognition of services rendered, or to enhance, supplement,
augment, facilitate or initiate services performed by PenCom, including, but not
limited to, applying for and receiving grants of money or equipment from other
governments. Such gifts and grants shall not replace any Member's financial
contribution as required by this Agreement and shall be the sole property of
PenCom. Grant applications shall be prepared under supervision of the
Communications Manager.
E. Funding for PenCom will be provided through local and state-imposed 911
taxes, emergency communications sales and use tax revenues, grants, City and
Member service fees, with the balance of the required revenue being derived from
the Members and City through a funding formula. The funding formula shall
establish a fair and equitable contribution for each Member. The funding formula is
contained in Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.
F. The funding formula in Exhibit A may be amended to assure a fair and equitable
funding of the services as follows:
The Advisory Board may recommend the amended funding formula to the
City following a unanimous vote by the Board during a meeting held prior to
July 1 st and in accordance with Paragraph II.A. Prior to taking action on the
proposed amendment, all Members shall be provided with copies of the
proposal and be given an opportunity to submit written comments for
consideration by the entire Board. If all Members do not agree to an
amended funding formula which is fair and equitable, the formula shall be
subject to the dispute resolution process set forth in Section XIII.
G. Members shall on a quarterly basis make their financial payments for the cost
of operation of PenCom. Each Member will be billed quarterly in equal amounts
for its share of the annual operating expenses of PenCom based on the funding
formula in Exhibit A. Annual contributions will be adjusted in the first quarter of
each subsequent year to reconcile any overpayment or underpayment by any
individual user agency for the previous year
H. In the event a budget shortfall occurs due to an emergency or other unforeseen
or extraordinary expenditure, and upon recommendation of the Board, the City
may assess each user an additional amount, based on the above computation of
financial contributions, subject to the approval of all of the Member's legislative
bodies.
VII. FACILITY.
A. The City shall provide the facility and space for the PenCom. If located in
existingCity buildings, the City shall not charge Members for the use of the space.
IX. EQUIPMENT.
A. Reliable communications equipment is essential to successful emergency
dispatch and public safety communications. Each Member and the City will be
responsible for purchasing, installing, maintaining and repairing its own
communications equipment and shall retain all rights to such equipment. New
equipment purchased by Members shall be compatible with the overall
communications scheme established by the Olympic Public Safety Communications
Alliance Network (hereinafter referred to as OPS-CAN), an alliance formed for the
purpose of managing the region's radio systems. PenCom and Members may
collectively or individually be represented on OPS-CAN's govemance committee.
Each Member, while retaining its ownership or licenses, agrees to permit use and
operational control of the Member's frequencies by PenCom. Each Member shall
be responsible for renewing the Member's radio licenses at the end of the license
periods and to maintain base radio stations, repeaters and other radio support
equipment outside PenCom's facility in a manner which is compatible with
PenCom's equipment. Failure to adequately maintain such equipment shall subject
the Member to expulsion fi.om PenCom by a majority vote of the Members.
B. The cost of telephone lines, fiber optics, radio or microwave links or other
methods of communication between PenCom and the various radio or computer
equipment owned or operated by a Member's personnel, or for the purpose of
controlling or using such facilities, shall be the sole responsibility of the Member.
C. Members will maintain an emergency power source for their communications
equipment which shall be capable of at least 8 hours of sustained operation without
commercial power. Such emergency power source shall be capable of sensing a
commercial power failure and automatically starting and/or transfering said
equipment to the emergency power source.
D. All assets purchased by PenCom shall be held in the name ofthe City for the
benefit of PenCom. The City of Port Angeles shall be responsible for the
maintenance of all such equipment in good repair, normal wear and tear excepted.
X. COMPUTER SERVICES.
A. The City shall provide for the development and utilization of computerized
dispatch and records management systems to provide information to Members
contracting for such services. Entry of information and retrieval of data to and
fi.om the system shall be the responsibility of the Member having such capability,
except for that data captured during the dispatch process. Each Member shall be
responsible for maintaining its own records, reports and security.
6
B. The City shall provide for the entry and maintenance of warrants and domestic
violence records, including but not limited to timely and accurate database entry,
recording of service, recall and other activity, and maintenance and auditing of paper
files for local, state, and national systems.
C. Clallam County (hereinatter referred to as "County") shall provide normal
hardware maintenance of the computer processing unit (CPU) and operating systems
for as long as PenCom operates its computer aided dispatch and/or records
management soitware on an IBM I-Series platform. Such maintenance shall include
but not be limited to IPL's, file backup, device configuration maintenance, operating
system upgrade installation, assistance with installation of application software, etc.
Costs of labor associated with routine maintenance and operating systems may be
charged to the Enhanced 911 fund at up to 30 hours per month. Costs of software,
hardware, maintenance contracts, or cost of County personnel time beyond normal
working hours shall be paid either as shared costs as specified in Exhibit A, from 9-
1-1 funds, or as otherwise determined by the Board.
D. Accurate and timely information in law enforcement computer systems is vital
to the mission of law enforcement. Each law enforcement Member agrees to
comply with all applicable provisions of the ACCESS User Acknowledgement in
Exhibit B.
XI. KEY OFFICIALS
The personnel specified in this Agreement are considered to be essential to ensure
maximum coordination and communications between the parties and the work being
performed hereunder. Any party, on notice to all other parties, may designate
another person or a person to act in his/her place, in an emergency or otherwise. The
key officials for the City and Members are designated in Exhibit C.
XII. INSURANCE AND LIABILITIES.
PenCom will maintain property insurance and liability coverage as an entity
independent fi.om the City, the cost of which will be an operating expense of
PenCom.
Except for liability that is subject to immunity as provided by Ch. 38.52 RCW or the
Federal Tort Claims Act, as amended (28 USC 1346, 2671-2680), each party agrees
to defend, indemnify, and hold the other harmless fi'om any claims directly resulting
from such party's sole negligence and from actions or omissions that are solely
attributable to any employee, official or agency of such party.
XlII. DISPUTES BETWEEN PARTIES.
Should a dispute arise between the City and any Member, the parties may resolve
the same by submitting the dispute to non-binding mediation. The mediator shall be
selected by mutual agreement of the parties, and the costs of mediation shall be
shared equally between the parties.
7
Should the parties be unable to negotiate a resolution or refuse to accept a mediated
resolution to a dispute, then the parties agree that the venue of any legal action shall
be the Clallam County Superior Court. In the event any party files litigation to
enforce this Agreement or any portion thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled
to reasonable attorney fees and costs, including any fees and costs incurred in an
appeal, as determined by the appropriate court.
XIV. MODIFICATIONS.
This Agreement may only be modified in the form of amendments in writing by
mutual agreement by the City and all Members. Written requests for modification
will be forwarded to the Board by written notice at least sixty (60) days prior to the
proposed date of such modification. The Board will review and provide a
recommendation to the City regarding the incorporation of the proposed amendment
to this Agreement.
XV. PRIOR AGREEMENTS.
This Agreement, upon its effective date, supersedes the previous PenCom Dispatch
and Computer Records Service Agreements.
XVI. SEVERABILITY.
The terms of this Agreement are severable and a determination by an appropriate
body having jurisdiction over the subject matter of this Agreement that results in the
invalidity of any part shall not affect the remainder of the Agreement.
XVII. EXHIBITS. A. Exhibit A - Peninsula Communications Funding Formula
B. Exhibit B - ACCESS User Agreement
C. Exhibit C - Key Officials
8
SUBSCRIBED by the appropriate officers who are duly authorized to execute this
Agreement on behalf of the governing bodies of the below-named governmental
entities.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES:
Dated this day of ,200__
Mayor, City of Port Angeles
AP:./c~VED AS TO FORM
City Clerk City Attot~
CLALLAM COUNTY:
,200_~
'C'liair,X:lallam C~unty B6ard of Commissioners
Clerk of the Board Deputy Prosecutor
CITY OF SEQUIM:
Datedthis:,cO,~c~ daY0f / 7 ?,~-.SC./-~ ,200~
Mayor, City of Sequim
< -..." %.. ~--~_~_.J× ~/ .
9
CLALLAM COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 2:
Dated this ~;~ ~/~-~r_.~ ,200.~_~
APPROVED AS TO FOR3.~I
Commissioner Attorney for the District
Commissioner
CLALLAM COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 3:
'~ ~ .,-,~d' -c,'~'.s~/ ,2oo7a/
Dated this ,.~ ~" day of
Con~miss~otf6r -~;"' .
Commis~oner /' ~"' / Attorney for the District
Commissioner
CLALLAM COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 4:
Datedthis ,~' day6f )~//~.Tcr~ ,200i
Commissioner// (5;mmissioner
' Commissione~'
~ornn~issic~ner
~~ ~~_ ~PP~OV~O^s~o~o~
Corn~nissioner
Attorney for the District
l0
CLALLAM COUNTY RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT $:
Dated this c~ day of /~~' - ,200__~
Commissioner
Attorney for the District
LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE:
Dated this day of ,200, ,,
Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Chief Financial Officer Tribal Attorney
QUILEUTE TRIBE:
Dated this~.P/,, ,7.4 day Of ~f-~--~.,~_,~3,c~--~'.e'/¢~--z_.,' .200 ~:,,/'
Chai~rson' -
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Chief Financial Officer Tribal Attorney
11
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE:
Dated this /.a .day. of .,q~a,g/g. ,200'-/'
Superintendent //~/ ~Sandra Thomas
Olympic Nation/~l~ark Contracting Officer
National Park Service
EXHIBIT A
PenCom Funding Formula
PenCom's overall budget is determined by the goals of the strategic plan and budget figures
supplied by the City's Finance Department.
"Calls for Service" is defined as any incident resulting in one or more emergency services units
being dispatched and/or a report or event number being generated. The communications manager
may adjust agency totals where calls for service are assigned differently between agencies. It is
the goal of PenCom to maintain a uniform call for service counting method among the Member
agencies. Call for Service counts are obtained from the New World Systems software.
"Percentage of Use" is established by determining the total number of calls for service and their
respective percentage of the total for each of the two major functions performed by PenCom; (1)
law enforcement and (2) fire and emergency medical dispatch. The fire agencies' share of the
budget is based on calls for service as provided by the New World Systems software multiplied
by 1.5 and divided by the total calls for service for both fire and medical calls to determine the
average weight of each fire call for service overall. The total fire calls for service is then
multiplied by the average weight and divided by the overall total of police and fire calls for
service to determine fire agencies' percentage of the budget. The overall police share of the
budget is the budget funded by Members minus the fire agencies' share.
9-I-1 excise tax revenues and emergency communications sales and use tax revenues that are
used for funding operational costs, anticipated grant funding, and Lower Elwha Tribal Police,
Quileute Tribal Police and Olympic National Park service fees are subtracted from the total
projected budget. Lower Elwha Tribal Police and Quileute Tribal Police service fees are solely
based on the number of full time, sworn officers. Olympic National Park's fee is charged at the
same rate as the lowest paying law enforcement Member. The balance of the budget is allocated
to the major functions as follows:
FIRE:
Percentages of use for individual fire members are determined by taking the total calls for service
for each fire member and dividing it by the total fire calls for all fire members. These figures are
used to allocate each Member's share of the overall fire share of the budget.
LAW ENFORCEMENT:
The number of full time sworn officers for each Member is multiplied by $2,000 for a base
amount. These numbers are then totaled and subtracted from the police share of the overall
budget. That total is then divided further based on the percentage of calls for service for those
agencies that use PenCom's full services, including the records management system. The base
amount is added to the percentage amount for a grand total for each Member.
EXHIBIT B
WASHINGTON STATE PATROL
ACCESSNVACIC/NClC
USER ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I. Introductiorl
Since its inception, the National Crime linformation Center (NCIC) has operated
under a shared management concept between the FBI and state users. The
NCIC Advisory Policy Board established a goal of having a single state agency
in each state assume responsibility as the NCIC Control Terminal Agency (CTA)
for the state, through and by which NCIC users in that state.would access NCIC.'
The CTA is responsible for the planning of necessary hardware, software,
funding, and training all authorized agencies within the state for complete
access to NCIC data services.
The Board approved the CTA concept in order to unify responsIbility for system
user discipline, and adherence to system procedures and policies within each
state. The CTA also serves as a central point in its state for handling record
validations, quality control matters, dissemination of manuals and other
publications, security matters, user training, audits, and any other problems
concerning system use that may arise.
The responsibilities of the Control Terminal Officer (CTO) are detailed in several
documents related to the ACCESS/WAClC/NClC system. This agreement
outlines the varied, responsibilities of a CTO as they pertain to the NCIC system.
FBI NCIC responsibilities under this shared management concept includes
provision of:
· Operational, technical, and investigative assistance to NCIC users;
· Telecommunications lines to a state interface;
· Legal and Legislative review of matters pertaining to NCIC;
17
ACCESS/WACIC/NCIC USER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
,,', · Timely information on all NCICaspects of system usage bY means of
.,: theNCIC Operating Manual, Technical and Operational Updates, 'and
related documents; .'
· Staff research assistance; ":.
· Training and training materials to the control terminal agencies.
The following documents are incorporated by reference and made part of-thiS user
acknowledgment: WAClC Manual; ACCESS Manual; NCIC Computerized criminal
History (CCH) Program Background, Concept and Policy, as 'amended or' superseded
by implementation of the Interstate Identification Index (111) Program; c~de of Federal
Regulations, Title 28, Part 20; NClC Standards as recommended by ·the'NClC Advisory
Policy board and approved by the FBI Director;' applicable federal and state laws and
.regUlations; ACCESS/WAClC rules, regulation, and policies as recommend by the
Advisory Council on Criminal Justice Services.
il. DEFINITIONS
"Control Terminal Agency (CTA) ....
In Washington, the CTA is the Washington State Patrol'
"NCIC Control Terminal Officer {CTO)"
The NCIC CTO is the Commander of the Washington State Patrol's Criminal
Records Division. .'.
]'he CTO and his agency will be responsible for monitoring system use,
enforcin9 system discipline, and assuring ACCESS. WACIC, and NCIC
operating procedures are followed by all users of the respective
telecommunications lines, as well as other related duties as outlined by this
document.
"Terminal Agency Coordinator (TAC)"
A TAC shall be appointed at each terminal location and be Level II certified. The
TAC shall be responsible for ensuring his/her agency is in compliance with state
and NCIC policies and regulations, including validation requirements.
ACCESSNVACIC/NCIC USER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
"Timeliness"
WACIC/NCIC records must be entered promptly to ensure maximum system
effectiveness.
A timely entry in the Wanted Person File is made immediately once:
1. The decision to arrest or authorize arrest has been made; and
2. The terms of extradition have been established.
The date of want or warrant must be the date on which all those decisions were
made.
A timely removal from the file means an immediate clearing of the record once
the originating agency has documentation the fugitive has been arrested or is no
longer wanted.
Timely system inquiry means initiation of the transaction before an officer
releases a subject or begins writing an arrest or citation document of any kind;
inquiry prior to the release of a person who has been incarcerated; or inquiry
upon those who appear at a custodial facility to visit inmates.
Timeliness of entry/modification in the Missing Person File is generally the same
as in the Wanted Person File.
Timely entry/modification of vehicle, license plate, and vehicle part data matches
the wanted person standard, less the extradition considerations. Entry should
be made as soon as a cross-check of the Department of Licensing's Registration
File has been completed.
Timely entry of gun, article, and securities information means within a few hours
of the time complete information is available.
"Validation"
Validation (vehicles, plates, fugitives, missing person entries) obliges the ORI to
confirm the record is complete, accurate, and still outstanding or active.
Validation procedures are defined in Section IV-C of this agreement.
ACCESS/WACIC/NCIC USER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
"Completeness"
Complete records of any kind include all information available on the person or
property at the time of entry. The validation process should included a review of
whether additional information has become available (missing from original
entry) that could' be added.
Complete inquiries on persons include numbers that could be indexed in the
record (i.e., Social Security, passport, VIN, license plates, driver's license, etc.).'
Inquiries should be made on all names/aliases used by the suspect. Complete-
vehicle inquiries include VIN and license plate numbers.
"Accuracy"
The accuracy of WACIC/NCIC data must be double-checked by a second party.
· The verification should include assuring the data in the WAClC/NClC record
matches the data. in the investigative report and that other checks (VlN/lincence
numbers) were made. Agencies lacking support staff for this cross-checking
should require the case officer to check the record, as he/she carries primary.
responsibility for seeking the fugitive or the stolen property.
III. OPERATIONAL RE~;PONSIBILITIE~
To ensure the proper operation of WAClC/NCIC, the standards, procedures,
formats, and criteria, as contained in ACCESS/WACIC operating manuals, will
be followed. A specific operational situation is:
Hit Confirmation Policy
The agency that obtains a hit has the ability to designate to the entering agency
one of two priorities for confirmation.
PRIQRITY 1: URGENT
Confirm the hit within 10 minutes. In those instances where the hit is the only
basis for detaining a suspect or the nature of a case requires urgent confirmation
of a hit, the highest level of priority should be specified.
Each agency must, within 10 minutes, furnish to an agency requesting a record
confirmation, a response indicating a positive or negative confirmation or a
20
ACCESS/WACIC/NCIC USER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
notice of a specific amount of time necessary to provide a response to the
request for record confirmation.
PRIORITY 2; ROUTINE
Confirm the hit within one hour. Generally, this priority will be used when the
person is being held on local charges, property has been located under
circumstances where immediate action is not necessary, or an urgent
confirmation is not required.
Each agency must within one hour, furnish to an agency requesting a record
confirmation, a response indicating a positive or negative confirmation or a
notice of a specific amount of time necessary to provide a response to the
request for record confirmation.
An agency requesting confirmation which fails to receive a response to the first
request shall generate a second request with a copy to the CTO. The CTO will
institute appropriate action to ensure proper response to a hit confirmation
request and to comply to system standards. This appropriate action may include
canceling the record by the CTA.
IV. QUALITY ASSU -RANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
A. Introduction
Criminal justice agencies have a specific duty to maintain records that are
accurate, complete, and up-to-date. The CTA will ensure there are
standards for security, audits, and personnel training; which would allow
the dissemination of accurate and up-to-date records.
B. Record Quality
Errors discovered in WAClC/NClC records are classified as serious
errors, form errors, or an error trend.
(1) Serious errors: WACIC/NCIC will advise the ORI via teletype
message of an apparently erroneous record and request it be
verified, changed, or canceled within 24 hours. The record will be
canceled if neither a response is received nor corrective action has
been taken during the allotted time.
21
ACCESS/VVACIC/NCIC USER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT '.
(2) Form errors or error trends: the CTA will notify the ORI by letter of
the corrective action to be taken. No further notification of action
will be taken by the CTA.
C. Record Validation
WACIC/NCIC periodically prepares listings of records on file for',validation
purposes. Validation listings are prepared pursuant to a schedule, as
published in the WACIC Operating Manual. These listings are mailed to
the originating agency.
Validation obliges the ORI to confirm the record is complete, accurate,
and still outstanding' or active. Validation is accomplished by reviewing
the original entry and current supporting documents, and by recent
consultation with any appropriate complainant, victim, prosecutor, court,
motor vehicle registry files, or other appropriate source or individual. In
the event the ORI is unsuccessful in its attempts to contact the victim,
complainant, etc., the entering authority must make a determination
based on the best information and knowledge available whether or not to
retain the original entry in the file. Validation procedures must be
formalized and copies of these procedures must be on file for review
during an NCIC/ACCESS audit.
Each agency will receive a letter explaining what records are contained in
the validation and general procedures forvalidating the records. A
"REPLY REQUIRED" letter is included for the agency to certify the
records have been validated.
Validation certification means: (1) the records contained on the validation
listing have been reviewed by the originating agencies; (2) the records
which are no longer current have been removed from WACIC/NCIC and
all records remaining in the system are valid and active; (3) all records
contain all available information; and (4) the information contained in
each of the records is current and accurate, including appropriate
extradition information.
If the CTA has not received a certification response from an agency within
the specified period of time. the CTA will purge from WACIC/NClC all
records which are the subject of that agency's validation listings. (NOTE:
If a CTA fails to certify any validation listing to [he NCIC within the
6
22
ACCESS/WACIC/NCIC USER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
specified time, all invalidated records from that state will be purged by the
NCIC.)
V. SECURITY RESPONSIBILITIES;
A. General
Security guidelines, relating to WASIS and NCiC III criminal history
record information, are set forth in the NCIC Computerized Criminal
History Program Backgroundls Concept and Policy as superseded by the
III program, in Title 28; Code of Federal Regulation, Part 20, Subparts A
and C; and by state statute in RCW 10.97 and Washington's
Administrative Code, chapter 446-20.
All agencies participating in the ACCESS system must comply with and
enforce system security.
B. Originating Agency Identifier (ORi)
The assignment of an ORI to an agency is not a guarantee of access to
the systems. The ultimate decision regarding who may access
WAClC/NCIC lies with the CTA.
The CTO will coordinate the assignment of new ORI numbers, the change
in ORI location or address, any other changes, cancellations, or
retirements of ORIs accessing WACIC/NCIC. The agency shall notify the
CTO of any such changes.
Application fc~r assignment of new ORIs shall be made directly to the
(;TO. Such application shall contain documentation of the agency's
statutory authority as a criminal justice agency and a statement that
indicates the agency allocates more than 50 percent of its annual budget
to the administration of criminal justice. Noncriminal justice agencies.will
be denied an ORI, unless under management control of a criminal justice
agency, a copy of the management control agreement must be submitted
to the CTO.
7
ACCESS/WACIC/NCIC USER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
VI. COMPUTERIZED CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORD INFORMATION
RESPONSIBILITIES
A. Each agency shall conform with system policies, as'established by the
ACCESSNVACIC manuals, before access to criminal history record
information is permitted. This will allow for control over the data and 'give
assurance of system security.
B. The CTA is responsible for the security throughout the system it services,'
including all places where terminal devices are located. Upon
determination that a terminaJ is in non-conformance with sYStem
management or security policy, the CTA has the authority to impose
sanctions, including termination of service.
C. The rules and procedures governing direct terminal access to criminal
history record information shall ap. ply equa~ly to all participants in ~the
system.
D. All criminal justice agencies having direct access to computerized CHRI
data from the system shall permit an NCIC or WACIC audit team to
conduct appropriate inquiries with regard to any allegations of security
violations. Agencies must cooperate with these audits and respond
promptly.
E. All computers and manual terminals interfaced directly with the
ACCESS/WACIC/NClC systems for the exchange of criminal history
record information must be under the management control of a criminal
justice agency, as defined by the NCIC CCH background and policy
document....
F. Each agency shall have in place a system for logging ali inquiries of the
III, which log shall include the name of the individual within the criminal
justice agency to whom the response is given. These logs shall be
maintained for at least 12 months from the date of inquiry and must be
available to assist in the State or National audit program.
G. Each agency receiving an III response shall record any secondary
dissemination. These logs shall be maintained for at least 12 months
from the date of inquiry.
24
ACCESSNVACIC/NClC USER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Agencies must institute a program of systematic self-audits as a means of
.guaranteeing the completeness and accuracy of the information in the system.
These self-audits should be on a continual basis to ensure both quality .
assurance and compliance with standards. -:
Compliance audits will cover the following areas of the III, WACIC/NCIC stolen
property, and person records:
Accuracy
All WACIC/NClC entries shall contain no erroneous data.
Completeness
All information contained in a WACIC/NCIC entry or in a criminal history record
shall contain the most pertinent information available.
Timeliness
All entries, modifications, updates, and removals of information shall be
completed, processed, and transmitted as soon as possible, in accordance with
established standards.
Locates
All wanted/missing persons, and property records, which are apprehended or
recovered~ shall be promptly placed in "located" status, except those located
outside of the stated area of extradition or return.
Security
It is the responsibility of an agency to protect its information against
unauthorized access, ensuring confidentiality of the information in accordance
with laws, policies, regulations, and established standards.
Dissemination
All information released shall be in accordance with applicable laws and
regulations, and a record of dissemination of criminal history records shall be
maintained for one year and made available for NCICNVAClC audit review.
25
ACCESSNVACIC/NCIC USER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
VII. ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES
A. The agency shall respond to requests for information by the FBI NCIC or
WAClC in the form of questionnaires, surveys, or similar methods, to the
maximum extent possible, consistent with any fiscal, time, or personnel
constraints of that agency,:
B. The CTO.-shall offer system training to agencies accessing WAClC/NCiC
through the state computer. Agencies shall assign appropriate.
employees to attend classes When offered. If employees are using
inquiry only function's, they'must.attend Level I certification training.
Employees entering"information into the NClCANAClC system and
Terminal Agency Coordinators (TAC) must attend Level I! certification
training. All certifications must be renewed biennially.
C. The CTO will distribute, within the state criminal justice community, the
ACCESS/WAClC manuals: NClC Code Manuals, and as requested,
miscellaneous publicationS, in order to enhance effective use of the
WAClC/NClC system. The agency shall incorporate such changes upon
receipt.
10
26
ACCESS/WACIC/NCIC USER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
As an agency head/director serving in the ACCESS/VVACIC/NCIC system, I hereby
acknowledge the duties and responsibilities as set out in this document, as well as
those documents incorporated by reference. I acknowledge that these duties and
responsibilities have been developed to ensure the reliability, confidentiality,
completeness, and accuracy of all records contained in or obtained by means of the
WACIC/NCIC system. I also acknowledge that a failure to comply with these duties
and responsibilities will subject my agency to various sanctions. These sanctions may
include the termination of ACCESS/VVACIC/NCIC services to my agency.
Agency Head (Please Print) Date
Agency Head sigr{ature --
Agency Name
l!
EXHIBIT C
Key Officials
NAOMI RIGGII~ SHERIFF JOE MARTIN
Communications Manager Clallam County Sheriff's Office
Port Angeles Police Department 223 East 4"' Street, Suite 12
321 East 5a SIm:t Pon Angeles, WA 98362
Port Angeles, WA 98362 360-417-2464
360-417-4911 E-Mail: jmarti _n('t't't't't't't't~.clallam.wa. us
360-417-4556 fax
E-Mail: nri~ins~_.cio/ofpa, us CHIEF MIKE LASNIER
Lower Elwha Tribal Police Dcparlmem
CHIEF JON C. BUGHER 285 ! Lower Elwha Road
CCRFP District g2 Port Angelea, WA 98363
P. O. Box 1391 360-452-8471, ext. 117
Port Angeles, WA 98362 E-Mail: lasnier~_ Iwha. nsn.us
360-452-7725
360-452-9235 Fax SANDRA THOMAS
E-Mail: ccfd2 _Ct~voen. com Contracting Officer
Olympic National Park Headquarters
CHIEF STEVE VOGEL Pon Angeles, WA 98362
CCRFP District #3 360-452-4501
323 North 56 Aveaue
Sequim, WA 98382 CHIEF TOM RIEPE
360-683-4242, e~. I4 Port Angeles Police Department
E-Mail: svogel _(~clailamfire3.org 321 East 5a Street
Pon Angeles, WA 98362
CHIEF DAVE CHASTAIN 360-417-4901
CCRFP District g4 360-417-4556 fax
P. O. Box 106 E-mail: tricoe~.ciwofpa, gov
Joyce, WA 98343
360-928-3132
GLEN McDANIEL
CCRFP District
P. O. Box 530
Clallam Bay, WA 98326
360-963-2558
E-mail: mason aef~_centurytel.net
CHIEF DAN MeKEEN
Pon Angeles F~ Depanmem
102 East 5~
Port Angeles, WA 98362
360-417-4655
360-417-4659 fax
E-Mail: dmckeea~_ ¢itvof~us
CHIEF JENNIFER ROTH
La Push Police Department
P. O. Box 248
La Push, WA ~50
36O-374-9O20
£-Mail: laoushlxi~_ Iwen.com
CHIEF K~N BU~GE
Sequim Police l~en!
609 Wes~ Washington, Suite 16
Sequim, WA 983~2-3291
360-683-'/227
360-683-4556 fax
E-Mail: kbur~C~_ .clallam.wa.tr~
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
April 6, 2004
CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Headrick called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order
REGULAR MEETING: at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mayor Headrick, Councilmembers Braun, Erickson,
Munro, Pittis, Rogers, and Williams.
Members Absent: None.
Staff Present: Manager Quinn, Attorney Dickson, Clerk Upton, B.
Collins, D. McKeen, T. Riepe, Y. Ziomkowski, C.
Kochanek, R. Dyker, C. Wheeler, G. Kenworthy, T.
McCabe, K. Loghry, R. Hoffman, K. Ridout, T. Smith, J.
Lierly, and B. Kaj fasz.
Public Present: R. Peterson, F. Ducceschi, V. and L. Sproat, T. Bockman,
L. Williamson, M. Douglas, O. Campbell, P. Gagnon, L.
DelGuzzi, J. and S. Evans, D. Frizzell, J. and L.
Hendrickson, V. DelGuzzi Frizzell, D. Becker, G. and M.
Page, R. Becket, C. Palazzo, K. Jons, K. Rodocker, S.
McCallin, P. Lamoureux, C. Haarstad, T. Ahlgren, A. and
T. Allen, V. Adams, B. and L. Zynda, M. and L.
Ostrowski, and M. Oakes. All others present in the
audience failed to sign the roster.
PLEDGE OF The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Police Chief Riepe.
ALLEGIANCE:
PUBLIC CEREMONIES, ]. Proclamation and Recognition of Retirement of Dale Miller:
PRESENTATIONS AND
PROCLAMATIONS: Mayor Hcadrick read and presented Dale Miller with a proclamation honoring Mr.
Miller's retirement fromthc City after thirty years of service. Mr. Miller acknowledged
Proclamation/Recognition thc support and leadership of Jack Pittis and Ken Ridout, and hc acknowledged the
of Retirement of Dale support of his wife and daughter throughout his career. Manager Quinn presented Mr.
Miller Miller with the James Abernathy Outstanding Public Service Award, and Public Works
& Utilities Deputy Director Ridout presented Mr. Miller with a retirement plaque.
Scott Brodhun, Port Angeles School District, presented Mr. Miller with a "Riders" hat,
thanking him for his recycling efforts throughout the School District, and George
Kheriaty, Hamilton Elementary School teacher, presented Mr. Miller with a card of
appreciation from the students, the contents of which were recycled materials.
Plaque of Appreciation to 2. Presentation of Plaque to Jim Jones, Law Enforcement Advisory Board
Jim Jones, Law Enforce- Member from 1994 - 2004:
merit Advisory Board
Member Mayor Headrick and Police Chief Riepe presented Jim Jones, Jr., with a plaque of
appreciation for his ten years of service on the City's Law Enforcement Advisory
Board. Mr. Jones responded it had been a wonderful opportunity to serve on the Law
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
Plaque of Appreciation to Enforcement Advisory Board in service to the community.
Jim Jones, Law Enforce-
ment Advisory Board
Member (Cont'd)
Proclamation Recognizing 3. Proclamation Recognizing April as National Occupational Therapy Month:
April as National
Occupational Therapy Mayor Headrick read a proclamation recognizing April as National Occupational
Month Therapy Month. The proclamation was accepted by five Occupational Therapists, one
of whom announced an upcoming demonstration of all aspects of occupational therapy,
scheduled for Saturday, April 17, 2004, 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 Noon, at the YMCA
Community Center. The public was invited to attend.
Earth Day Proclamation 4. Earth Day Proclamation:
Mayor Headrick read a proclamation declaring April 22, 2004, as Earth Day.
Presentation Regarding 5. Presentation Regarding Carnegie Library by Historical Society:
Carnegie Library by
Historical Society KathyMonds, Executive Director of the Clallam County Historical Society, distributed
information to the Council depicting the conceptual design of the various exhibits
proposed for the Museum to be housed in the renovated Carnegie Library. She showed
additional drawings to the Council, explaining the projected details and themes of the
historical exhibits and artifacts and how they will be configured in the Museum. Ms.
Monds indicated the preliminary planning stages have been completed, and the
Historical Society is quite excited with the progress made and is looking forward to
completion. Ms. Monds expressed the hope that the exhibits can be placed on the
upper floor of the Carnegie Building in July, and she indicated the lower level will
feature a gift shop and an exhibit scheduled to change every nine to twelve months.
Ms. Monds thanked the City for its support throughout this endeavor. Mayor Headrick
asked for a projected opening date for the Carnegie, and Ms. Monds responded the
building will be opened April 25* to celebrate the County's Sesquicentennial. There
will be no exhibits at that time; however, the public will be invited to see the building.
Councilmember Williams urged the Historical Society to extend an invitation to
Congressman Dicks for that opening date since he was significant in obtaining funds
for the Carnegie renovation.
Break Mayor Headrick recessed the meeting for a break at 6:30 p.m. to have refreshments in
honor of Dale Miller's retirement. The meeting reconvened at 6:55 p.m.
WORK SESSION: None.
LATE ITEMS TO BE Paul Lamoureux, 602 Whidby, expressed his best wishes to Manager Quinn and Public
PLACED ON THIS OR Works & Utilities Director Cutler for their scheduled trip to Indonesia.
FUTURE AGENDAS:
Leroy Sproat, 615 Thistle Street, advised the Council that he originally planned to
come before the Council to appeal the denial of Right-of-Way Use Permit RWU 04-02,
615 Thistle Street, by the Director of Public Works. He since discovered that the City
is not the legal owner of the right-of-way. Mayor Headrick inquired as to whether this
matter was on the meeting agenda, and Manager Quinn indicated that staffhad placed
the matter on the agenda but, after talking with Mr. Sproat this past week and learning
of his plans to withdraw the application, there was no need for an appeal. The matter
was, therefore, removed from the agenda. Mr. Sproat provided the legal description
of the property in question, and he indicated the plat was developed and recorded in
1892. In February of 1897, all unopened right-of-ways were vacated by statute under
Session Laws 1889-90, Chapter 19, Section 32, Page 603. The property was not
annexed into the City until May of 1966; therefore, according to Mr. Sproat, falling
under the 1897 law. He indicated the right-of-way was still unopened when he moved
30
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
LATE ITEMS TO BE there in January of 1975. Further, he indicated no maintenance to this section of right-
PLACED ON THIS OR of-way has ever been performed by the City in the thirty years he lived there; he has
FUTURE AGENDAS: maintained the right-of-way at his expense. Mr. Sproat indicated he had discussed this
(Cont'd) law with three professional land surveyors from three different from and received the
same answer from each of them in that vacation by statute is legal and binding. Mr.
Sproat felt that a precedent had been set by the City accepting these £mdings on other
properties in the City. He, therefore, contended he was the legal owner of the right-of-
way in question, and a right-of-way permit becomes moot.
Steve Rodrigues addressed the Council, seeking support for the placement of the
Kalakala in the City of Port Angeles once the Kalakala has been completely renovated.
Noting the Kalakala is temporarily stored in Near Bay, Mr. Rodrigues spoke of the
heritage of the Kalakala, the importance to economic development and tourism, the
need for planting a seed for growth in community spirit, and the fact that the Kalakala
satisfies much of the historical criteria to be placed on national historical records. He
assured the Council he would work hard to make this effort a progressive, aggressive,
positive step for the community.
Gerald Hauxwell, President of the Port Angeles Business Association, read and
presented a letter to the Council from the PABA, urging the Council's consideration
of an expression of support and encouragement for the Kalakala Alliance Foundation
and its plans to develop the Kalakala as a tourist destination in the City. The letter
indicated there would be no expectation of financial support from the Port Angeles
public sector.
Dot Fitzgerald, owner of Peninsula Travel and Olympic Peninsula Tours, spoke in
support of placing the Kalakala in Port Angeles, as it would enhance tourism and
economic impact to the community.
Becky Rice, Log Cabin Resort, also spoke in support of placing the Kalakala in Port
Angeles, feeling it would help develop tourism and establish more jobs.
Cherie Kidd, 101 E. l0th Street, spoke of the increased publicity for the area just by
virtue of the possibility of the Kalakala coming to Port Angeles. She felt it has served
as a magnet for Port Angeles to be seen and heard, drawing a great deal of positive
attention. She expressed the hope that the City Council would see the value of having
this special art deco ferry in Port Angeles.
Jack Glaubert, East Sequim Bay, echoed comments from previous speakers, urging the
Council's unanimous support to bring the Kalakala to Port Angeles as its permanent
home.
Bill Zynda advised the Council that Mr. Rodrigues was seeking the Council's
endorsement of bringing the Kalakala to Port Angeles in order to access grants and
loans for the renovation. Mr. Zynda was certain the Kalakala's presence would
significantly enhance tourism - there would be much to gain.
Robert Sommers, 104 Hancock, has been volunteering on the Kalakala effort, and he
encouraged the Council to support bringing the Kalakala home.
Mayor Headrick indicated the Council would take the matter of the Kalakala under
advisement and would be considered by the Community and Economic Development
Committee.
Carl Haarstad, 316 N. Race Street, owner of the Thor Town International Hostel,
indicated he is a contract employee of environmental toxicology at Battelle Marine
Science Laboratories, and he is a member of the Citizens Advisory Committee for
Clallam Transit. Referencing a hospital parking lot recently constructed at Caroline
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
LATE ITEMS TO BE and Chambers, Mr. Haarstad expressed concern w/th current development and
PLACED ON THIS OR expansion plans of the hospital specifically related to lack of tree planting in the
FUTURE AGENDAS: parking lot, as well as the impingement of lighting on area residences. He also
(Cont'd) expressed concern on the matter of required storm drainage, and his concerns were
heightened when the hospital purchased the lot adjacent to his property. Mr. Haarstad
expressed the hope that errors made on the other parking lot would be corrected in the
future, and he suggested that the City and Clallam Transit should address the hospital' s
transportation needs so that employees don't need to rely on personal cars. He felt this
especially important in view of off-street parking requirements, as well as the fuel
shortage. Brief discussion followed, and Mayor Headrick advised Mr. Haarstad that
the City Council has representatives serving on the Transit Board, so perhaps the matter
could be addressed at the Transit meetings.
FINANCE: 1. Water Utility Materials, Project 04-05:
Water Utility Materials Deputy Director of Public Works & Utilities Kenworthy summarized information
relative to the purchase of Water Utility materials, and Councilmember Pittis suggested
that, in keeping with past practice, the Mayor should receive the authorization to sign
the associated contracts. Therefore, Councilmember Pittis moved to authorize the
Mayor to sign the contract for Schedule A items from Hersey Meter in the
amount of $33,935.81, including sales tax, and Schedule B items from H. D.
Fowler in the amount of$50,136.12, including sales tax. The motion was seconded
by Councilmember Braun and carried unanimously.
"F" Street Substation 2. "F" Street Substation Rebuild, Project 01-28:
Rebuild
Deputy Director Kenworthy reviewed the bids relative to the "F" Street Substation
Rebuild, and Councilmember Williams moved to award the bid and authorize the
Mayor to sign the contract with Tiee Electric Company of Portland, Oregon, in
the amount of $106,892.10, including sales tax. Councilmember Rogers seconded
the motion, which carried unanimously.
2004 Water Main 3. 2004 Water Main Improvements, Project 04-01:
Improvements
The scheduled 2004 Water Main improvements along the north side of 2na Street
between Chambers and Ermis Streets were summarized by Deputy Director Kenworthy.
Councilmember Rogers moved to award the bid for the 2004 Water Main
Improvements, Project 04-01, to Jordan Excavating of Port Angeles, Washington,
and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract in the amount of $176,295.07,
including sales tax. Brief discussion ensued concerning the accuracy of the Engineer' s
Estimate, as well as the lack of opportunity and appropriateness for co-locating other
utilities in the same vicinity. A vote was taken on the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Equipment Purchase - 4. Equipment Purchase - Vehicle Replacements, Project 04-02:
Vehicle Replacements
Deputy Director Kenworthyreviewedbids received on the vehicle replacements, noting
this constitutes the annual equipment replacement asset fo~ah in the budget. Ruddell
Auto Mall bid below the State bid. Councilmember Braun moved to authorize the
City Manager to sign contracts and purchase orders with Ruddell Auto Mall for
the 8 new pickups and 2 new vans in the amount of $161,032.12, including sales
tax. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Pittis and carried unanimously.
Councilmember Rogers expressed pleasure w/th the effort to include local dealers in
the bidding process.
CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember Erickson moved to accept the Consent Agenda, to include: 1.)
City Council Minutes of March 15, 2004 special meeting and March 16, 2004 regular
meeting; 2.) Expenditure Approval List - March 26, 2004 - $1,101,001.06; 3.)
32
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
CONSENT AGENDA: Electronic Payments - March 26, 2004 - $1,887,047.00; 4.) Legal documents
(Cont'd) consenting to assignment of Nippon Paper Industries USA's Ediz Hook sublease from
Tesoro Marine Services to Tesoro Refuting and Marketing Company; and 5.) United
Way 2004 Contract. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Braun and
carried 6 - 0, with Councilmember Rogers abstaining from the vote due to late
arrival at the March 15, 2004, special Council meeting.
CITY COUNCIL There were no committee reports submitted; however, Councilmember Pittis related
COMMITTEE informationgamered from a staffmember from Helena, Montana, who had participated
REPORTS & in a trip to Croatia and gained a great deal of value from the trip.
CALENDAR:
ORDINANCES NOT None.
REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
RESOLUTIONS: NICE Neighborhoods Program & Resolution (New Improvements for Community
Enhancement of Neighborhoods):
NICE Neighborhoods
Program & Resolution Manager Quinnreviewed the strategy of NICE Neighborhoods (New Improvements for
Resolution No. 5-04 Community Enhancement of Neighborhoods) to stimulate economic development and
growth of the community' s tax base through public capital investment in areas of high
development potential in thc City. He noted that, in spite of limited resources, the City
should invest in areas where there is a potential for development by putting in thc
necessary infrastructure. Manager Quinn indicated that the program will enabte the
City to be proactive, and thc funding of projects chosen would be determined through
the CFP process. He reviewed in detail the various objectives of the NICE
Neighborhoods Program, indicating thc development and £mancial community would
be involved in determining needs for project selection.
Councilmember Rogers indicated the CED Committee had discussed a program such
as this. She was pleased to see it formalized and urged thc Council' s adoption of thc
program. Discussion ensued with Manager Quinnclarifying the differences between
this program and tax increment £mancing. Thc NICE Neighborhoods program is
similar to tax increment financing; however, thc City would not be issuing bonds or
borrowing money for the infrastructure. He acknowledged the two could be very
compatible, and he agreed with Mayor Headrick's observation that more money can be
generated tl~ough tax increment £mancing by virtue of the fact that more agencies
would likely be involved. Councilmember Pittis, while supportive of the concept,
expressed concern with the long-term impact on General Fund services. Manager
Quinn indicated this wouldbe a "pay as you go" process so, as the areas are developed,
more taxes to the General Fund would be generated. Further, he felt the program
should be implemented with a development agreement. Councilmember Rogers spoke
in support of improvements to the neighborhoods, and Manager Quinn noted that,
because of limited resources, the City will be limited in what it can accomplish in a
given year.
Mayor Headrick read the Resolution by title, entitled
RESOLUTION NO. 5-04
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
adopting an additional strategy of focusing public infrastructure
improvements to stimulate economic development and tax base
growth through NICE Neighborhoods.
Councilmember Williams moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. The
motion was seconded by Councilmember Rogers and carried unanimously.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
Break Mayor Headrick recessed the meeting for a break at 8:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened
at 8:10 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - Watershed Plan (Continued frorn March 16, 2004):
OTHER:
CommunityDevelopment Director Collins advised the Council that the public hearing
Watershed Plan was continued from the last meeting. The signing ceremony for the Watershed Plan is
Resolution No. 6-04 scheduled for 10:00 a.n% April 16, 2004, at the County Commissioner's Office, and
the Mayor should plan to attend if the Council adopts the Plan this evening. The final
draft of the Plan, dated March 24, 2004, has been reviewed by Orville Campbell, the
Council's representative to WP, IA 18.
Mayor Headrick reopened the public hearing at 8:11 p.m.
Orville Campbell, 820 Milwaukee Drive, characterized the overall Watershed Plan and
emphasized its important points, noting that the committee had been very concerned
about the subject of unfunded mandates and the associated impacts on the City's budget
in the implementation of the Plan. He felt the outcome was very good in the sense that
the mandatory budget considerations were really insignificant, and most of the issues
in the Plan that were of any consequence were largely optional or, at least, would
require external funding sources. Mr. Campbell informed the Council that a major goal
of the Watershed Plan had to do with the requirement that surface water needs of any
future development must be met out of the existing water rights in the County. If, for
Port Angeles, that means the City is the holder of the largest water rights that are under-
utilized at the present time, then it means that the City's water rights would be used for
supplying the needs of a developing UGA to the east and west of the City, from the
Elwha to Morse Creek.
Mr. Campbell continued that there were a number of issues that arose during the
development of the Plan that could not be f'mally resolved and incorporated in the Plan.
One of the issues had to do with the Forest Practices on which the City had taken the
position that it did not want to have another body established to be involved in
hydrology and forestpractices around the harvesting of timber in the watersheds. So
that issue, along with some others, was put into the Appendix for resolution at some
future time by the Initiating Governments. Mr. Campbell noted that one of the
questions raised by the Council during the previous discussion was related to the
subject of enforcement. He indicated there are two aspects, one of which is the subject
of third party suits being brought for failure to comply with the Watershed Plan itself,
and the other being the liability of the City for the results of implementing the
Watershed Plan. He likened the implementation of the Plan to the City's land use
Comprehensive Plan in that whenever the City takes action or makes a decision relative
to some development, one of the considerations will be the Watershed Plan in the same
way that the City's land use Comprehensive Plan is handled today. From a third party
lawsuit perspective, Mr. Campbell felt it would appear that the Watershed Plan itself
and the adoption thereof would serve as a strong defense against any third party
concerns.
Another aspect that the City Council will need to deal with at some point is the
establishment of the West WRIA 18 Watershed Council, which would be an ongoing
body tasked with resolving those issues not currently resolved and providing technical
advice and input for the future. He noted there would be a need for City representation
on that group. Mr. Campbell informed the Council there is an amendment process
included in which the Watershed Plan can be changed, modified, added to or subtracted
from, and the process incorporated for those changes would be the same as that
instituted for writing the original Plan, with unanimous agreement among the Initiating
Governments. He felt it important that the City monitor the near shore marine
environment and the proposals that may arise in the future regarding adjustments that
need to be made or might need to be made for the harbor and the bluffs west of the
34
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
PUBLIC HEARINGS - City, such as the landfill area that can and would impact the City. In closing, Mr.
OTHER: Campbell felt the Plan itself is an excellent document considering the fact it was put
(Cont'd) together with a tremendous amount of public input and was designed by a committee.
He felt the outcome exceeded reasonable expectations in terms of meeting the City's
Watershed Plan needs. The enabling legislation identified the need to provide for water resources for
Resolution No. 6-04 growing municipalities across the State and to meet the needs of fish. In Mr.
(Cont'd) Campbell's view, at least for WRIA 18, the Plan has met that expectation and was,
therefore, worthy of the City Council's support.
Discussion followed, and Mr. Campbell responded to Councilmember Munro by
discussing the process for public input and the method of determining what would be
incorporated in the Plan. He felt most everyone realized they must seriously consider
the consequences of each and every element in terms of impact on the various entities.
There was a spirit of willing compromise in putting the Plan together, and many of the
issues that caused concern were mitigated, compromised, or were removed, so the
document is one that Mr. Campbell felt the City could feel very good about in that it
accomplishes what was intended by the Legislature.
There being no further public testimony, Mayor Headrick closed the public hearing at
8:25 p.m. Mayor Headrick acknowledged Mr. Campbell's commitment to this process;
he then read the Resolution by title, entitled
RESOLUTION NO. 6-04
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
resolving to work under the policies of the Water Resources
Inventory Area 18 (WRIA 18) Watershed Management Plan.
Couneilmember Braun moved to pass the Resolution as read by title.
Councilmember Erickson seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
OTHER 1. Appeal of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Determination for a 20-
CONSIDERATIONS: Unit Subdivision and Consideration of Preliminary Subdivision Proposal -
Dekay: North of Scribner Road East of Albert Street:
Appeal of SEPA
Determination for 20-Unit Mayor Headrick summarized the appeal of the SEPA determination for a 20-unit
Subdivision and subdivision, as well as consideration of a Preliminary Subdivision for Dekay, north of
Consideration of Scriber Road east of Albert Street. He asked if anyone was present on behalf of the
Preliminary Subdivision - appellants.
Dekay
Jim Hendrickson, 4519 South Coyote Run Lane, was present to speak on behalf of the
appellants, and he inquired as to whether only one person could speak to the issue.
Mayor Headrick responded there could be more that one speaker; however, Community
Development Director interjected that, in the appeal process, only one speaker is
allowed for each side. In this instance, there could be one speaker for the appellants
and one speaker for the City. Mayor Headrick asked why the attorney of record was
not present, and Director Collins indicated he had asked the same question and was not
given a response. Mayor Headrick had the expectation that the attorney would be
present and would speak for the group; however, in his absence, the Mayor allowed
some leeway by allowing more than one person to briefly address the Council.
Continuing, Mr. Hendrickson stated that the appeal noted a terrible drainage problem
coming from Coyote Run Lane, running down the hill through Thistle and Rhodes
Road and running through one of the neighbor's farms. He felt it was something that
had to be addressed. They were told that part of the water would be diverted to
Peabody Creek, and part of it would be diverted to a natural runoff in between the
properties which, Mr. Hendrickson felt, would create more of a problem. Further, he
addressed the issue of Old Mill Road, where the City had developed up to Rhodes
3§
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
OTHER Road which, he thought, was up to City standards. However, from Rhodes Road to the
CONSIDERATIONS: County line, he felt the road to be substandard, as already indicated by the City
(Cont'd) Engineer. Mr. Hendrickson indicated a traffic counter had been utilized and, not only
is the road not wide enough, but there are more cars than actually should be on that
Appeal of SEPA road for its present condition. He identified the issue of Mill Creek, noting there has
Determination for 20-Unit been no consideration of whether Mill Creek will be bridged. He felt that hadn't been
Subdivision and addressed as yet, because the plans haven't been finalized.
Consideration of
Preliminary Subdivision - Mayor Headrick responded that the issue of Mill Creek wouldn't be finalized, as this
Dekay (Cont'd) would be a preliminary approval and, assuming it is approved, a number of conditions
must be met before final approval can occur.
Mr. Hendrickson acknowledged the Mayor' s comments, and he then identified another
problem with construction on Scribner Road. If, in fact, the construction were to take
place, it would impact six parties who reside on Coyote Run Lane, as Scribner is the
only road those parties can use. He noted there is one binding issue in that Mr.
Collins, at the Planning Commission meeting, indicated the City owned the right-of-
way on Scriber Road or could obtain the right-of-way,which Mr. Hendrickson felt was
not the case. He asked that Dave Becket provide further information in that regard.
Mayor Headrick informed Mr. Hendrickson that the Council packet contained
information relative to the right-of-way, and he indicated that staff had submitted a
recommendation on the Scriber Road issue, which is something to be addressed by the
developer. If the development is approved, it would be conditioned upon certain things
occurring and, if they didn't occur, then there would be no development. Mr.
Hendrickson indicated the matter was not that clear at the Planning Commission
meeting.
Bill Jensen, a Rhodes Road property owner who introduced the water issue, indicated
the proposed project adjoins his property on the corner. He resides directly north,
having lived in that location his entire life, and he felt there were issues that must be
resolved. Having not seen the Council packet, he was not aware of what hurdles the
developer must address, but he was familiar with what happened on Rhodes Road at
an earlier date, as well as on Thistle and Rose. Mr. Jensen indicated the facilities were
not in place in the City to accommodate this development. He indicated he has been
in the City for fifteen years without sewer, a service that can't be provided to him, plus
the matter of drainage has arisen. The other issue is that related to traffic, because of
the substandard roads, and Mx. Jensen stated that the City might deal with Old Mill
Road, but couldn't deal with Rhodes Road. He cited another development at Rhodes
Road and Old Mill Road, noting a terrible liability exists because of the dangerous
traffic conditions and the excessive speeds of those traveling the roads. Mr. Jensen
stated his strong opposition to the development under consideration.
Mayor Headrick asked Director Collins to explain his recommendations based on the
three areas identified in the appeal: additional traffic impact on Old Mill Road, Scriber
Road right-of-way, and drainage. Director Collins advised the Council that the packet
contained information that was provided by Mr. Oliver, attorney for the appellants.
Director Collins then reviewed packet information prepared by staffthat addressed the
three issues under appeal and, in this particular case as well as in all subdivision and
SEPA reviews, adequate street and drainage improvements have been required by
either the preliminary subdivision conditions of approval or the SEPA mitigation
measures. Those conditions are anticipated to be part of the development project itself.
The f~rst issue under appeal that had been addressed by Messrs. Hendrickson and
Jensen was related to traffic, traffic safety, and substandard roads. He indicated there
are substandard conditions and inadequate right-of-way on both Old Mill Road and
Scribner Road. Director Collins added that Albert Street also did not have adequate
right-of-way, and those issues were addressed in the conditions or mitigation measures
to require the subdivision to have those improvements made to City standards. Old
Mill Road would require the same kind of improvement fromRhodes Road to Scribner
36
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2OO4
OTHER Road except that it is an arterial. Director Collins advised the Council that the City had
CONSIDERATIONS: two options for those improvements, one of which is the standard road arterial right-of-
(Cont'd) way that is shown on Old Mill north of Rhodes Road, and the other is the new low
impact development standards which would require a slightly different form of
Appeal of SEPA improvement, which does not include curb and gutter or parking strips in the roadway
Determination for 20-Unit design. Regardless of the substandard condition and the traffic, those roads would have
Subdivision and to be brought up to the City standard in order for the subdivision to proceed to final
Consideration of approval. Once those standards are satisfied, then the traffic needs and the safety issues
Preliminary Subdivision - for those road segments would be met. Director Collins continued that Mr. Jensen's
Dekay (Cont'd) concern about Rhodes Road was not addressed in this application, because there's no
specific access to Rhodes Road through this subdivision. There is an emergency access
road only that is not usable by the general public, and even the people that own
property in the subdivision would not use that roadway for access. The only way they
would access Rhodes Road would be through Scribner and Old Mill Road. Director
Collins indicated that, in regard to whether those impacts have been adequately
described and mitigated, the fact that those improvements would necessarily be made,
does in fact mitigate the substandard conditions and would prevent the problems that
were described earlier.
Director Collins referenced the second question regarding the roadways themselves,
the issue of right-of-way, and whether or not the City's standards could be met because
of inadequate right-of-way. He indicated this issue would apply to Albert, Scribner,
and Old Mill Road, and the developer and the City are obligated to acquire adequate
rights-of-way in order to make those improvements meet the standards. Director
Collins advised the Council that, in the case of Albert Street, there are only 30 feet of
right-of-way at this time, and 37 feet would be necessary in order to meet the minimum
standards. The City would require an easement on the property of the subdivision, on
the east side of Albert Street, for a pathway. If the property tothe west subsequently
subdivides and the rest of Albert Street is dedicated, that pathway could be moved to
the west side of the street and, in doing so, the standard requirements could still be met.
In the case of Scribner Road, Director Collins felt the City has the ability to acquire all
of the right-of-way. However, there was a question raised by Mr. Becker pertinent to
his ownership of 30 feet of right-of-waybetween the City's reservoir and the existing
30 feet of the Scribner Road right-of-way and whether or not the City possesses any
access rights over that 30 feet of roadway. Director Collins indicated those issues
would have to be resolved in the development of the road in order to put in the
standard improvements, which would have to be made in order for the subdivision to
move forward. He emphasized that the conditions or the impacts would have to be
addressed prior to final subdivision.
Director Collins referenced the third issue regarding Scribner Road and whether or not
the City's standards would adequately protect Mill Creek. He advised the Council that
the roadway currently crosses Mill Creek, and the expected improvements would likely
have very little impact different from the existing roadway. The primary change in the
roadway would likely be the addition of pavement to the roadway and the creation of
biofiltration swales on the north and south sides of the roadway, which would protect
the water quality of the drainage going into Mill Creek. He felt that a curb and gutter
situation would simply be a trap resulting in the water more rapidly entering Mill
Creek. The design that the City now utilizes for low impact development standards
would result in improved quality of runoff going into Mill Creek.
The final issue identified was the matter of drainage and whether or not the
environmental review sufficiently addressed those drainage problems. Director Collins
informed the Council that this property was cleared after the first subdivision was
approved in 1995, and the clearing of that property exacerbated the drainage going
through and off of the property. When the development was approved, it was approved
under standards that were current at that time, requiring drainage retention and
detention facilities that would mitigate the drainage problems. Director Collins felt
37
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
OTHER that, to alleviate the problems on Ivlr. Jensen's property or properties to the north, it
CONSIDERATIONS: would be helpful to develop drainage facilities with the improvements required from
(Cont'd) the subdivision, at which point the drainage that goes off of the site would be returned
to what it was before the property was cleared. Further, under those circumstances,
Appeal of SEPA there would be a measurable improvement in the flow of stormwater off of the
Determination for 20-Unit property, both in terms of the quality of the water coming off the property and in the
Subdivision and slowing down of the rate of the water coming off the property. Director Collins stated
Consideration of that this particular subdivision is not required to fix the drainage problems of the area;
Preliminary Subdivision - they are only required to make the improvements that adequately retain and detain the
Dekay (Cont'd) water coming off of their property and their development. He stressed that the
conditions of the approval would require that specific mitigation. Based on the facts,
he felt that the appeal issues had all been addressed. He acknowledged that there are
substandard conditions and there are problems; however, he believed that the
requirements for approval of the subdivision had addressed the issues so that they
would be adequately mitigated. Director Collins added that, once mitigated, there
would no significant adverse impacts that had not been addressed.
Director Collins advised the Council that, before proceeding with the subdivision
decision, the Council should make a decision on the SEPA. The two options would be
to determine that the adverse impacts and the issues of appeal have been adequately
addressed and then hold in favor of the Responsible Official's Determination of
NonSignificance. He added that the laws of the City and the State require that the
Responsible Official's decision is entitled to substantial weight. The other option he
identified would be to determine that there is a probable significant adverse impact that
is not adequately mitigated, in which case the Council would define what that impact
would be, and an Environmental Impact Statement would then be required. If the
Council were to make that decision and decide in favor of the SEPA appeal, then the
Council could not move forward on the subdivision this evening. The 90-day time limit
set forth in the RCWs would be stopped while the Environmental Impact Statement was
being written, and the clock would then start again when the EIS was complete. The
matter would be returned to the Council for a decision on the subdivision at that time.
Director Collins indicated the process is at the end of the 90 days; in fact, there has
akeady been an extension of time on this particular project.
Discussion followed, and Director Collins responded to an inquiry from
Councilmember Pittis, clarifying that Old Mill, from Scribner to Rhodes, must be
improved to arterial street standards. Councilmember Williams noted there are two
different City standards that could be applied, and Director Collins clarified that either
standard would meet the requirement for safety and traffic movement. With one
standard, there is a required 40-foot roadway, with curb and gutter, and, with the other
standard, there is a 24-foot roadway with no parking lanes and a separate walking path
to protect pedestrians. With the latter standard, there would be biofiltration swales on
both sides and, with either improvement, the traffic needs would be met. Director
Collins cited Old Mill Road as an example where there could be the application of the
low impact standard for arterials. There is currently less than 20 feet of pavement, and
the ditches do not meet City standards. In addition, there is no walking path that is
provided at this point, so those improvements would have to be made, or curb, gutter,
and sidewalks would have to be added. Responding to a question from Councilmember
Williams, Director Collins clarified that 24-foot widths are required of arterials, and
20-foot widths are required of access roads. City Engineer Kenworthy and Director
Collins expanded on the width requirements, noting that the new pavement would
increase 5 - 6 feet in most places, and there would be a separation of pedestrian
facilities by the ditches themselves. The ditches would be much wider than those that
presently exist.
Counciimember Williams focused on the area between Rhodes, Old Mill Road, and
Crabapple Place, asking if the zoning was RS-7, to which Director Collins responded
the area was RS-9, plus he thought the area from Laurel to Canyon Edge, south of View
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 20O4
OTHER Crest was RS-9. He felt there may be some RS-7 zoning along Peabody.
CONSIDERATIONS: Councilmember Williams observed that most of that area would result in large lots -
(Cont'd) larger than in the mainpart of town, to which Director Collins agreed. Councilmember
Williams then sought clarification from Director Collins as to the location of the City
Appeal of SEPA limits and the Urban Growth Area. Director Collins indicated there's a slight UGA
Determination for 20-Unit area west of Old Mill Road that runs down towards Valley Creek that is not in the City
Subdivision and limits now, but for the area south and to the east of the comer of Scribner and Coyote
Consideration of Run, there is no urban growth area. He added that, several years ago, the Coyote Run
Preliminary Subdivision - residents approached the City about extending the Urban Growth Area in the hopes of
Dekay (Cont'd) getting a sewer to that area. The request didn't go forward, and no decision was made.
Councilmember Williams further queried as to whether some of the appellants were
inside the City or inside the County. Director Collins felt they were both.
Councilmember Williams indicated that the entire area has been problematic in that
there have been complaints about water drainage in the areas of Canyon Edge Drive,
Ahlvers, Galaxy Place, and the area south of Dogwood. He cited the area of Albert and
Rose where there is water runoff, and he felt that this type ofinfill represents the classic
example of what will be the urbanization of a rural area. As that progresses, he could
see these difficulties being exacerbated. Director Collins felt that the proposed
development would alleviate some of the water problems cited, pointing out that the
way this property was clear cut has caused more runoff. Once the property is
developed and the drainage requirements put in place, there should be an improvement.
Director Collins cited the more developed parts of the City, where the water is
adequately handled. He felt that it's not the amount of impervious surface, but the
facilities for storm drainage that determine whether there will be a flooding problbm.
Otherwise, the question might be asked why Mr. Jensen's property, which is very
undeveloped, has a lot of stormwater. Director Collins continued that it's not because
of impervious surface on Mr. Jensen's property but, as Mr. Hendrickson said, there's
a problem with water running down Coyote Run and then coming onto this property
and then going off this property to Mr. Jensen's property and ultimately down into
Canyon Edge or Galaxy Place or other areas of the City. The drainage improvements
would mitigate the stormwater problem by retaining the water on the site, releasing it
slowly so that it doesn't inundate those properties further downhill to the north.
Councilmember Williams asked, in cleating the area and getting it prepared for
grading, wouldn't the City's development regulations have some kind of best
management practices to alleviate the water existing in the area. Director Collins
responded that the City does have best management practices for the development
process. However, this process started in 1995, and the property owner abandoned the
process and didn't make the completion of the improvements that would have helped
mitigate the situation. Thus, there is a situation that is unmitigated and the approval
and improvements that would follow this approval would begin to mitigate the
problem. Councilmember Williams then asked about safeguards for surrounding
neighborhoods when a developer goes in, begins to clear property, and then doesn't
follow through. Director Collins indicated that temporary erosion controls are in place,
and City Engineer Kenworthy explained that, under current standards in place on
clearing and grading, the City can require a bond to assure that those things are put in
place, and the bond remains in place until permanent facilities are complete. Engineer
Kenworthy anticipated that, prior to the start of grading, the City would require an
erosion control bond to assure these are maintained, and the bond would be based on
the amount of the construction of facilities, installation and maintenance.
Councilmember Williams indicated the area was cleared in 1995, recalling there were
some homes on Rose in the early 90s that had some significant water problems. City
Engineer Kenworthy was aware that water problems existed in that area prior to this
area being cleared, which is typical of the entire stretch of the City in this particular
area. This is where the groundwater comes to the surface in this area, as the water
doesn't go into the ground readily, so with new development, the City now has
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
OTHER regulations that require detention to assure that the new development will not exceed
CONSIDERATIONS: the runoff of the pre-development state. The water is held back and released at a
(Cont'd) controlled rate. It is expected that, any time land is cleared, there will be more runoff,
something that can't be stopped short of injecting it back into the ground. The outflow
Appeal of SEPA of water can be controlled so there is no increase in downstream damage.
Determination for 20-Unit Councilmember Williams asked, in setting that flow, if the City was looking at pre-
Subdivision and 2004 or pre- 1995, and Director Collins responded the date would be pre- 1800, which
Consideration of is when the property was forested.
Preliminary Subdivision -
Dekay (Cont'd) Councilmember Williams cited previously expressed concerns relative to the
proliferation of cul-de-sacs and dead-end streets, and he noted packet maps in this
specific area where streets were going into cul-de-sacs. Councilmember Pittis, making
a point of order, urged the Council to direct its attention to the issue at hand, and
Councilmember Williams indicated he was attempting to determine ifa full EIS needed
to be done. Discussion and debate followed, and Councilmember Williams inquired
as to why the City wasn't making a larger loop instead ofdead -end streets. Director
Collins noted there is a BPA power line that prevents access, but Councilmember
Williams noted that issue didn't stop Old Mill Road from going under the line.
Director Collins indicated there was no desire on the part of the City to create that
connection because of the substandard nature of Thistle, Eunice, Rose, Albert, and
Rhodes. Councilmember Williams felt that, in upgrading Old Mill south of Rhodes,
there should be no problem with upgrading the rest of the neighborhood at the same
time in order to perhaps facilitate infill and more consolidated development. Director
Collins stated that the developer's responsibility is to provide access to a fully
improved street, not to improve every street. Councilmember Williamsobserved the
NICE neighborhoods concept would be a perfect example of putting the City' s program
into perspective for a long-term program in order to avoid spending a great deal of
money trying to get sewers and storm drainage into areas where the infrastructure has
been done piecemeal. Councilmember Williams moved that the issue be sent back
for an Environmental Impact Statement. Mayor Headrick asked for a second to the
motion, and Director Collins suggested the appeal process should be completed,
believing it would next go the applicant for input and then an opportunity for rebuttal
by Messrs. Hendrickson and Jensen. The motion, therefore, died for lack of a
second.
Councilmember Pittis inquired as to where is the discharge off the site for the
stormwater system, and Director Collins thought the discharge would go to the
northwest across Albert, which is required to be improved all the way to the north
property line which would be the intersection of the BPA power line. Director Collins,
again responding to Councilmember Pittis, explained there would be two natural
drainage areas. There would be a low area just to the west of the cul-de-sac and then,
once that area overflows, it would go to the north along the Albert Street right-of-way
or the extension of Albert Street, if there was right-of-way there. There would be a
small drainage channel that goes north and south, and Director Collins submitted that
the engineer for the applicant could better answer the question. City Engineer
Kenworthy explained that storm drainage, as currently proposed, would be detained in
detention facilities in Albert, and the northerly cul-de-sac at the intersection and would
then follow naturally north to a depression area as depicted on the map.
Councilmember Munro, noting the drainage issues currently experienced by those
down water residents, asked about the means to solve those problems. Director Collins
indicated there would need to be some stormwater facilities, as the water comes to
Rhodes Road and goes around Park Knoll. The main flooding area occurs at Canyon
Edge where the water covers the roadway and can be several feet deep. Having lived
in that area, he could attest to the volume of water. The water that goes to the west of
Park Knoll sheets across the vacant property that was previously referenced between
Crabapple and Park Knoll, and that eventually winds its way into Mill Creek in the
proximity of Ahlvers Road. Councilmember Munro asked if down water residents had
40
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
OTHER the means to go back to the property owner in the past, or now, to require some
CONSIDERATIONS: correction. City Engineer Kenworthy responded that, if the water is properly detained
(Cont'd) on the property and the discharge is not at a rate higher than pre-development rates,
then the down water residents would have no recourse against this property. He added
Appeal of SEPA that downstream properties are always obliged by law to accept water from upstream
Determination for 20-Unit properties. They have a right to defend themselves, but not to require the upstream
Subdivision and properties to stop the discharge of natural waters. Conversely, if the property owner
Consideration of didn't properly retain the water and there was increased flow, then they would have a
Preliminary Subdivision - course of action. Councilmember Munro observed there has been increased flow since
Dekay (Cont'd) 1995 and nothing has been done, and Director Collins indicated the effort is now
underway to make the necessary improvements. City Engineer Kenworthy clarified
that the City didn't know for a fact as to the amount of water and how much has
infiltrated but, at that time, the City had no means to require the same mitigation as
today, plus there was no bond on the project. Generally, if trees are taken down, there
is a potential for increased runoff.
Councilmember Munro understood that the City would have to acquire right-of-wayor
easement across property on Scribner and Old Mill Road. Director Collins agreed,
saying there is a need for additional right of way on both Scribner and Old Mill Road;
however, the City felt it could be more easily accomplished on Scribner than on Old
Mill Road. Councilmember Munro observed that theright-of-waywould likely have
to be obtained from people in this room, and he asked if the City has the right to
condemn property. Director Collins responded in the affirmative, noting that the
determination as to who pays for the right-of-way would be determined by the City
Council.
Jim Hendrickson returned to the podium, stating he could not understand how the City
could get involved in purchasing rights-of-way, as he felt that could be a legal issue.
He felt that if Old Mill Road wasn't addressed adequately, someone would get hurt.
The water issue, from his view, would result in water retention systems overflowing
during heavy rain.
Bill Jensen then returned to the podium, indicating he had a great deal more water on
his property now than ever before. He asked the Council to not rubber stamp the
project, but to put their best foot forward.
Steve Zenovic, 519 South Peabody, #22, speaking on behalf of the applicant, indicated
there has never been a denial that there is a drainage issue in the area, but he felt it to
be a real stretch to say this piece of property created the drainage issue. This piece of
property is doing what it can to solve the drainage issue. Coyote Run is part of the
drainage issue; all those areas south of Scribner Road that are in this drainage basin
have been cleared without any control by the City because of timing. His client did not
clear this property but, rather, the previous landowner cleared the property. The
applicant is realistically accepting the burden for this piece of property, but he didn't
know if it was too realistic to expect them to inherit the burden of all other landowners
who happen to be sitting in the audience complaining about drainage who have
previously exacerbated the problem. Mr. Zenovic indicated that Old Mill Road is
currently substandard, something that was identified at the Planning Commission. It
has vehicle traffic at 1000 ADT and can only support 400 ADT, and he agreed it needs
to be improved. He asked, however, where the line is drawn in terms of one
subdivision in an area fixing all the infrastructure problems for the entire area. Mr.
Zenovic felt that, if the applicant addresses the issues and hasn't argued about dealing
with Scribner Road or drainage, they have stepped to the plate to address the issues on
an environmental level, consistent with the scope of the project. He felt that Director
Collins' determinations were reasonable and appropriate.
Mayor Headrick asked if the problem on his client's property was worse than it was in
1990, and Mr. Zenovic was certain that it was. According to his recollection, it was
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
OTHER logged by the previous landowner and then sold, so around 1994-1995, it was harvested
CONSIDERATIONS: and, at that point in time, he didn't think there was a clearing and grading ordinance,
(Cont'd) so it could be done without any control. Mayor Headrick asked Mr. Zenovic of his
opinion on the mitigation measures proposed and what would they do to his client's
Appeal of SEPA property and runoff if those conditions were met. Mr. Zenovic indicated that the
Determination for 20-Unit conditions established at their post-development runoff rate cannot exceed pre-
Subdivision and development, which was established at second growth or fully forested land. So, the
Consideration of developer was committed to taking it back to a situation that is better than what they
Preliminary Subdivision - have right now. Mayor Headrick asked how that is accomplished, and Mr. Zenovic
Dekay (Cont'd) responded it would be based on the storage system, as they place over-sized pipes in
the ground, size the system to handle the water from the subdivision in such a manner
that, other than up to a 100-year storm, they are storing the water in the ground and
metering the outflow. Councilmember Rogers asked how long the current developer
has owned the property, and Mr. Zenovic believed it was purchased in 1995.
Councilmember Braun asked if the present owner was aware of the water problems in
the area above and below prior to or during purchase; Mr. Zenovic said that matter was
never discussed, and that he could not speak for the owner.
Councilmember Erickson asked if, because of the conditions placed in the SEPA, this
would be considered a Mitigated Determination ofNonSignificance. Director Collins
responded there weren't any mitigation measures in the current DNS. The prior DNS,
which was adopted, had two mitigation measures, one being the improvement of Old
Mill Road, and the other being the extension of the waterline utility service on the south
property line of the development. He emphasized that those two mitigation measures
were still in effect.
Mayor Headrick indicated this is a two-part process, the first being whether Council
accepts the City Official's Determination of NonSignificance for the development,
recognizing there are certain mitigating procedures or factors that need to come into
play in order to justify the Determination of NonSignificance. Presumably, the
mitigation measures, according to the determination, are necessary in order to have the
DNS. If there are no mitigation measures, then presumably an Environmental Impact
Statement would be justified.
Councilmember Williams asked Manager Quinn if the City had the ability in City funds
to assist with an EIS on a much broader scope, recognizing that smaller parcels were
only a minor contribution to a problem but, in the aggregate, may be just one more
piece of a larger problem. He agreed with Mr. Zenovic's characterization that this
parcel didn't create the problem for the entire area but, at the same time, this is the
focal point at the moment. Councilmember Williams suggested that, through some sort
of development fund at the City, there might be a way to look at the entire area from
Laurel to Peabody, out Canyon Edge, connecting back into Thistle up to Scribner, over
to Old Mill and back down into the creek. Manager Quinn responded that the current
CFP process of the City would be the most logical way to deal with these kinds of
issues, with the adoption of the NICE Neighborhoods Program and those kinds of
issues in the CFP process. The City has not budgeted for this particular project, as it
was not anticipated. Manager Quinn agreed there is a placeholder of$100,000 that has
been set aside for the NICE Neighborhoods program on which, however, staffwould
likely bring back a development agreement that would push it up to $400,000, because
of the impact of a proposed sewer capacity issue in the Park and Campbell
neighborhood. He felt this same kind of process could be used for drainage, and it
would be a reprioritization of the Council in the CFP process.
Councilmember Pittis, referencing Packet Page 144, cited the proposed measures to
reduce or conlxol surface, ground and runoff of water impacts, asking if the statements
noted were the limit of mitigation in the DNS as of now. Director Collins responded
that the City standards must be met and, he thought, the developer was willing to meet
those standards for the specified drainage improvements. Councilmember Pittis was
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
OTHER confused by the statement that there were no mitigations, and Director Collins clarified
CONSIDERATIONS: there were two mitigation measures previously, but they wouldn't make this a Mitigated
(Cont'd) DNS. When adopting the more recent DNS, the City did not adopt any mitigation
measures specifically, because those were already proposed by the applicant or
Appeal of SEPA required by conditions of the subdivisions. He added that the subdivision conditions
Determination for 20-Unit adequately address the same concerns that were in the previous mitigated DNS, such
Subdivision and as the upgrade of Old Mill Road to City standards.
Consideration of
Preliminary Subdivision - Councilmember Williams moved to reject the DNS and require an Environmental
Dekay (Cont'd) Impact Statement. Councilmember Braun seconded the motion. Councilmember
Pittis stated his desire to have the motion narrowed to water, as he was comfortable
with the transportation issues. He felt that stormwater was another issue, but
Councilmember Williams felt the Council should consider the circulation, eventually
out through Canyon Edge, back up through Scribner, down through Albert. At some
point, he felt, there would be traffic all over the area. Councilmember Braun
commented that eventually there will be additional developers go further to the south,
which will again create a problem. If the City were to take care of some of what is in
existence now, he felt the benefits would be realized in 20 - 50 years from now.
Councilmember Pittis expressed the opinion that this subdivision is out of line, is not
in the appropriate order, and the public interest would not be served by thc subdivision,
but he was willing to talk about the environmental issues first. Councilmember Braun
called for thc question, and a vote was taken on the motion, with Councilmembers
Williams and Braun voting in favor and Mayor Headrick and Councilmembers
Pittis, Munro, Erickson, and Rogers voting in opposition. The motion, therefore,
failed.
Councilmember Pittis felt that the real problem is one that is exacerbated by being up
against the Park, serviced poorly by existing roadways, and serviced poorly by utilities.
He noted one must "leap frog" over undeveloped land to get to it. Councilmember
Pittis, therefore, moved that the Preliminary Subdivision be denied. However,
Mayor Headrick indicated the Council was still addressing the issue of
NonSignificance, so Councilmember Pittis withdrew the motion. Ite subsequently
moved to accept the Determination of NonSignificance. Councilmember Erickson
understood the incorporation of mitigation standards, and she reiterated the notion this
would then become a Mitigated Determination ofNonSignificance. Mayor Headrick
restated the motion to deny the appeal and accept the Determination of
NonSignificance. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Erickson. Mayor
Headrick and Councilmembers Pittis and Erickson voted in favor of the motion,
and Councilmembers Williams, Braun, Rogers, and Munro voted in opposition.
The motion, therefore, failed. Mayor Headrick reviewed the two motions, both of
which failed, and Councilmember Pittis indicated that a 20-lot subdivision, being
realistic, could only afford to do so much, and he agreed there was a bigger issue
relative to the basin whether the City requires this subdivision to solve all the problems.
He felt he had enough environmental information to make a decision, and he felt it was
out of order of development sequence for a number of reasons. Manager Quirm
advised the Council that, under SEPA, there are two basic choices, one being a
Determination of NonSignificance and the other being an Environmental Impact
Statement. The EIS has been rejected and the DNS hasn't been approved. It appeared
to him that the issue was whether the City should consider making a determination for
a DNS with mitigations. He felt this is a mitigated DNS, since there are two conditions
incorporated in the DNS. But others could be added if so desired by the Council. The
Council could then proceed to the plat, and Director Collins indicated there are more
conditions that are in the subdivision recommendations that can be considered
mitigations. There is no requirement for mitigation measures if there's a standard that
is being required of the subdivision itself; the standard of the subdivision does not have
to be duplicated as a mitigation measure. Conditions of the subdivision are
requirements of the City in approving the subdivision. Councilmember Williams felt
it was a perfect argument for adding the mitigation measures to the DNS, because if the
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
OTHER Mitigated DNS was approved and the preliminary subdivision not approved, then the
CONSIDERATIONS: conditions of the preliminary subdivision wouldn't fold in to the development.
(Cont'd) Director Collins indicated that all conditions of the subdivision could be mitigation
measures of the DNS, and that if the subdivision is not approved, the DNS would be
Appeal of SEPA moot.
Determination for 20-Unit
Subdivision and Couneilmember Williams moved to accept the Mitigated DNS by adding
Consideration of Conditions 1 - 7, Findings 1 - 22, and Conclusions A - E, as set forth in Exhibit
Preliminary Subdivision - "A" which is attached to and becomes a part of these minutes. The motion was
Dekay (Cont'd) seconded by Couneilmember Pittis, who suggested a friendly amendment
correcting Conclusion A language from "short plat" to "long plat", which was
agreed to by Councilmember Williams. A vote was taken on the motion, which
carried unanimously.
Couneilmember Pittis moved that the Preliminary Subdivision be denied on the
basis that it is leap-frogging or circumventing undeveloped properties and the
public interest is not served by doing those extensions excessively to the
subdivision. Couneilmember Williams seconded the motion.
Discussion followed, and Councilmember Williams felt this subdivision is a much more
complex situation, and Councilmember Piths expanded on his position.
Councilmember Munro challenged the thinking by indicating there was a long process
ahead if the Council were to grant preliminary approval. He recognized, for the
property owners present, that a subdivision in a rural area is a big change, but it is
zoned appropriately and it is in the City limits. Preliminary approval requires that a lot
of work be accomplished, and it appeared to him that, if the development did occur and
Old Mill Road were fixed, Scribner Road were improved, and the drainage did not
worsen, he asked Council's consideration of approval at this point. Councilmember
Munro felt that preliminary approval meant the developer and the engineer had a huge
amount of work to do and must remm to the Council for final approval.
Councilmember Rogers added that she agreed with the zoning and she respected all of
the properties represented this evening, realizing the impact of change, but she
struggled with the fact that this developer might take the fall for an area that hasn't been
completely or properly planned. Her concern was what would happen with the next
developer, as the City has a responsibility to fix the area so that it is good for all
citizens. She struggled in that the developer was at the wrong place at the wrong time,
but the City has a responsibility to recognize there is a problem to solve. She
concurred that, while she knew preliminary approval could be very threatening, there
was an entire list of tremendous goals and accomplishments to be done. She felt there
will be development in the City, and this matter must be addressed at some point in
time. Councilmember Williams agreed it would be developed at some point, but he felt
this development was ahead of its time, reminding him of a subdivision on the west side
where a developer had to put in several blocks of sewer line and a roadway. At that
point, those individuals got their money back, and the City worked with them to get it
done correctly. He suggested the City go back anddeal with the area and determine
how this subdivision would fit in the piece of the larger puzzle to everyone's benefit
and, perhaps, on the City's side, deal with some of the infrastructure problems at the
same time.
Lengthy discussion followed as to fight-of-way acquisition, and Councilmember
Erickson felt that the right-of-wayissue was one of a Comprehensive Plan nature. She
felt it to be the developer's responsibility to acquire right-of-way. Councilmember
Pittis pointed out that the City wouldn't be lending its power of eminent domain to the
developer. Manager Quinn agreed, noting that the Council has a potential policy
decision regarding assistance to developers, no different than what was discussed with
the NICE neighborhoods. The City has the power to condemn property for public
purpose, such as rights-of-way to build roads. If one of the obstacles to future
44
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
OTHER development of this area is that the transportation / roadway system is inadequate in
CONSIDERATIONS: terms of right-of-way, then that area will never be expanded as it will be an excuse and
(Cont'd) an obstacle to never allow development in that neighborhood. Manager Quinn
continued that, if the only way to encourage future assessed value increases and
Appeal of SEPA development of the area is to remove the obstacle, the City may be the only one able
Determination for 20-Unit to remove the obstacle with the power of condemnation for public right-of-way.
Subdivision and
Consideration of Discussion followed, and Manager Quinn indicated that prior or current property
Preliminary Subdivision - owners may not necessarily control their drainage and it affects the whole area, which
Dekay (Cont'd) may be one of the potential issues that the City might address and assist to open the
area up for development. He delineated ways in which the City could assist in the
resolution of the drainage issues. Councilmember Pittis felt this would be one of the
most expensive areas to serve because of the lack of infrastructure, but Councilmember
Erickson felt that was insufficient reason to deny the subdivision. Councilmember
Munro wondered if the City could work with the developer to resolve some of these
problems, and Councilmember Rogers added that, when the stormwater ordinance was
adopted, consideration was given to the areas for prioritization. Although that work is
still in process, she assured everyone that Canyon Edge was one of the higher priorities.
She noted that, concurrently, the Stormwater Utility is being done, there is a CFP
process, and the NICE Neighborhoods approach is proceeding. She felt the City has
a responsibility to the entire area, as another subdivision in the area, not too far from
the one in question, was approved. Mayor Headrick repeated the motion to deny
the preliminary approval of the plat. A vote was taken on the motion, with
Councilmembers Pittis, Williams, and Braun voting in favor of the motion, and
Mayor Headrick and Councilmembers Munro, Erickson, and Rogers voting in
opposition. The motion, therefore, failed.
Councilmember Erickson moved to approve the Dekay Preliminary Subdivision,
citing Conditions 1 - 7, Findings 1 - 22, and Conclusions A - E, as set forth in
Exhibit "A" which is attached to and becomes a part of these minutes.
Councilmember Munro seconded the motion. A vote was taken on the motion,
with Mayor Headrick and Councilmembers Munro, Erickson, and Rogers voting
in favor of the motion. Mayor Headrick summarized that the preliminary approval
is agreed upon with all of the conditions that need to be met. The City may or may not
assist the developer, but from his perspective, he voted in favor of the motion, not
because he thought it would happen, butif the developer felt he could meet all of the
conditions, Mayor Headrick felt that would be in the community'sbest interest, as well
as the neighborhood's best interest if the developer could deal with some of the
stormwater issues. He indicated the expectation is for the developer to deal with the
stormwater issues, the widening of Old Mill Road, and the widening and paving of
Scribner Road. Councilmember Williams indicated that, for the record, he had
voted in opposition to the motion. Cotmcilmember Rogers concurred with the
Mayor's comments, but the City is in the process of starting to look at this year's CFP;
she felt the Council had received its marching orders loud and clear. Councilmember
Pittis indicated he did not want to spend money on residential property in this area,
because of the high costs. Clerk Upton informed Mayor Headrick that, for the
record, those who voted in favor of the motion were Mayor Headrick and
Councilmembers Munro, Erickson, and Rogers. She asked the Mayor to ask for
those voting in opposition. Mayor Headrick asked for a show of hands for those
voting against approval of the Dekay Preliminary Subdivision, and
Councilmembers Pittis, Braun, and Williams voted in opposition. The motion,
therefore, passed.
Extend Meeting Beyond Councilmember Williams moved to adjourn the meeting and continue it to
10:00 p.m. another time and date. The motion was seconded by Councilman Braun. A vote
was taken on the motion, with CouncilmembersWilliams, Pittis, and Braun voting
in favor, and Mayor Headrick and Councilmembers Rogers, Munro, and
Erickson voting in opposition.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
Extend Meeting Beyond Councilmember Munro moved to extend the meeting beyond 10:00 p.m. The
10:00 p.m. (Cont'd) motion was seconded by Councilmember Rogers and carried by a majority vote,
with Councilmembers Braun and Williams voting in opposition.
2003 Year-End Report 2. 2003 Year-End Report:
Finance Director Ziomkowski, aided by PowerPoint slides, presented the 2003 Year-
End Financial Report. She advised the Council that total expenditures of $65 million
were 10% more than in 2002, with most of theincrease incurred in power purchases.
Personnel represented 24% of the budget with an increase of 4%, and capital and
capital projects of $5.9 million increased by 13%. Debt Service increased by $600,000
or 21%, most of which was in Water and Wastewater Funds. Intergovernmental
expenditures of $2.4 million increased by 5%, and include utility taxes, the PenCom
Fund, and the County jail.
Director Ziomkowski reviewed in detail the General Fund, noting an increase in
revenues of 4.2% for a total of $13,865,886. Operating expenses were $12,956,960
or 2.9% less than in 2002. Director Ziomkowski noted that 50% of the General Fund
revenue increase was experienced in the "tax" category in the amount of $198,924.
The other half of the increase was in "charges for services". The City experienced an
8% growth in sales tax in 2003. Property taxes decreased as a result of the Nippon
settlement. Director Ziomkowski informed the Council ofupcomingconcems in the
area of property taxes, such as lack of growth, the impacts of Initiative 747, and the
impact of a proposed initiative that would decrease property taxes by 25%.
In reviewing the Utility Taxes for 2003, Director Ziomkowski indicated the Utility
Taxes were 11.4% over 2002 and 1.9% more than budgeted. In responding to an
inquiry from Councilmember Williams, she indicated that approximately 40% of all
utility taxes can be attributed to Nippon.
She then reviewed General Fund expenditures, indicating that expenses were 2.9%
below budget and 2.8% below 2002. The largest savings in the General Fund canbe
attributed to reduced jail expenses, plus the City realized a savings in personnel costs.
Director Ziorakowski reviewed the six-year financial forecast, Lodging Tax funds, as
well as the Street Fund. She discussed the Governmental Capital Projects and the
associated funding of those projects, and the status of the different utility funds.
Director Ziomkowski completed the report by reviewing the Internal Services Funds
and the City's investment portfolio, which experienced an average return of over 2.5%
with almost $40 million invested.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None.
QUASI-JUDICIAL:
INFORMATION: Manager Quinn directed the Council' s attention to an open position on the AWC Board
of Directors, District 12, in the event one of the Councilmembers was interested in
running for office to fill the vacancy. Councilmember Rogers showed interest in the
position.
Manager Quinn referenced the projects update included in the packet, and he noted the
letter concerning Clerk Upton's election as Secretary of the Washington Municipal
Clerks Association.
EXECUTIVE SESSION: Manager Quinn called for an Executive Session to discuss a property issue. The
meeting, therefore, adjourned to Executive Session at 10:40 p.m. It was then
determined that the subject matter was not defined enough for Executive Session.
RETURN TO OPEN The meeting returned to Open Session at 10:55 p.m., and it was agreed by consensus
SESSION: that the matter under consideration should be referred to the Community & Economic
4{i
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 6, 2004
Development Committee.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 10:55 p.m.
Richard A. Headrick, Mayor Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
47
48
· ~% Date: 4/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
'~" From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
DIRECT SAFETY CO MARKERS, PLAQUES,SIGNS 001-0000-237,00-00 -1.16
GARY AND DIANA SMITH DRA 93-01 permit 04-245 001-0000-239.20-00 340.54
NORMAN AND JANICE ROCKFORD DRA 93-01 permit 04-245 001-0000-239.20-00 340,54
DRA 93-02 permit 04-245 001-0000-239.20-00 1,009.19
MOORE MEDICAL CORPORATION Safety glasses 001-0000-237.00-00 -5.13
NFPA Mfg Home Installation Pub 001-0000-237.00-00 -3.55
ORIENTAL TRADING CO INC SUPPLIES 001-0000-237.00-00 -4.57
SUPPLIES 001-0000-237.00-00 -1.30
WA STATE PATROL - WASIS Crim History-Vanausdale 001-0000-229.50-00 24.00
Crim History-Wilson 001-0000-229.50-00 24.00
Criminal history-Bautista 001-0000-229.50-00 24.00
Criminal history-Carr 001-0000-229.50-00 25.00
Criminal history-Dailey 001-0000-229.50-00 25.00
Crim history-Dickinson 001-0000-229.50-00 25.00
Criminal history-Hudson 001-0000-229.50-00 25.00
Criminal history-Keend 001-0000-229.50-00 25.00
Criminal history-Munguia 001-0000-229.50-00 25.00
Division Total: $1,896.56
Department Total: $1,896.56
ADVANCED TRAVEL NLC Conf WA DC-Rogers 001-1160-511.43-10 86.50
ALBERTSONS INC COFFEE, WATER 001-1160-511.31-01 15.59
HARBOR CAFE COUNCIL MEALS 001-1160-511.31-01 79.60
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Reimburse meal_Cutler 001-1160-511.31-01 4,32
Legislative Mayor & Council Division Total: $186.01
Legislative Department Total: $186.01
ADVANCED TRAVEL NLC Conf WA DC-Quinn 001-1210-513.43-10 99.29
Elwha Dams panel-Quinn 001-1210-513.43-10 77.25
AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE 03-13 a/c 0172134468001 001-1210-513.42-10 74.51
VERIZON WIRELESS 03-15 A/C 36421103700001 001-1210-513.42-10 10.42
City Manager Department City Manager Office Division Total: $261.47
TERRYBERRY SERVICE PiNS 001-1211-513.31-01 912,99
City Manager Department Customer Commitment Division Total: $912.99
CLINICARE OF PORT ANGELES INC PREEMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 001-1220-516.41-31 25.00
FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC FSA MONTHLY PROCESSING 001-1220-516.41-50 526.70
FSA MONTHLY PROCESSING 001-1220-516.41-50 -526.70
OLYMPIC MEDICAL CENTER PREEMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 001-1220-516,41-31 20.85
City Manager Department Human Resources Division Total: $45.85
ADVANCED TRAVEL WMCA Conf-U pton 001-1230-514.43-10 672.73
VP CONSULTING INC LaserFiche Training 001-1230-514.41-50 320.80
City Manager Department City Clerk Division Total: $993.53
City Manager Department Department Total: $2,213.84
APT US&C ZIOMKOWSKI CERTIFICATION 001-2010-514.49-01 125.00
age1
:? City of Port Angeles Date: 4/14/04
City Council Expenditure Report
~ From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
Finance Department Finance Administration Division Total: $125.00
ADVANCED TRAVEL Grant Compliance-CP 001-2023-514.43-10 91.63
Finance Department Accounting Division Total: $9'1.63
DATABAR INCORPORATED CYCLES 11-15 3/18/04 001-2025-514.41-50 1,329.48
CYCLES 16-20 3/25/04 001-2025-514.41-50 1,048.77
Finance Department Customer Service Division Total: $2,378.25
DIVERSIFIED RESOURCE CENTER MARCH COPY RM SERVICES 001-2080-514.41-50 814.00
RICOH BUSINESS SYSTEMS A/C 9000005345000-APRIL 001-2080-514.45-30 632.13
XEROX CORPORATION FEB LEASE 001-2080-514.45-30 2,580.84
FEB LEASE 001-2080-514.45-30 1,200.23
FEB LEASE 001-2080-514.45-30 647.14
1ST QUARTER LEASE 001-2080-514.45-30 479.90
MARCH LEASE 001-2080-514.45-30 2,580.84
MARCH LEASE 001-2080-514.45-30 647.14
MARCH LEASE 001-2080-514.45-30 1,200.23
Finance Department Reprographics Division Total: $10,782.45
Finance Department Department Total: $'13,377.33
ADVANCED TRAVEL Legal Seminar-DeFrang 001-3010-515.43-10 261.96
Legal Research-Lusby 001-3010-515.43-10 208.90
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC 2571 MARCH COPIES 001-3010-515.45-30 14.80
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP APRIL LEASE 001-3010-515.45-30 83.35
MATTHEW BENDER & CO INC WA Supreme Ct Rpts V148 001-3010-515.31-01 21.37
OFFICE OF THE CODE REVISER Leg Session Laws 2004 001-3010-515.31-01 21.68
PORTANGELES CITY TREASURER Reimburse meals-YZ 001-3010-515.31-01 30.40
Postage-Lusby 001-3010-515.31-01 7.40
WEST GROUP Civil Judicial Prodedure 001-3010-515.31-01 49.72
Information chgs-February 001-3010-515.31-01 195.55
Attorney Attorney Office Division Total: $895.13
ADVANCED TRAVEL Legal Research-Kathol 001-3021-515.43-10 221.48
CAMERON, PAMELA March services 001-3021-515.41-50 673.33
CLALLAM CNTY DIST 1 COURT March Court costs 001-3021-515.50-90 5,409.38
CLALLAM JEFFERSON PUBLIC DFNDR Public Defender fees-Apr 001-3021-515.41-50 2,750.00
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC 2571 MARCH COPIES 001-3021-515.45-30 34.55
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP APRIL LEASE 001-3021-515.45-30 194.50
WEST GROUP Information chgs-February 001-3021-515.31-01 106.53
Attorney Prosecution Division Total: $9,389.77
Attorney Department Total: $10,284.90
vP CONSULTING INC LaserFiche Training 001-4010-558.41-50 481.02
Community Developmt Dept Planning Division Total: $481.02
AT&T WIRELESS (DIGITAL) 03-27 a/c 0033802563 001-4020-524.42-10 48.66
BIAW New Bldg Code-Collins 001-4020-524.49-01 75.00
New Bldg Code-Vess 001-4020-524.49-01 75.00
5=O~a9 e 2
· '~ Date: 4/14~04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
~' From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC 2572 MARCH COPIES 001-4020-524.45-30 123.93
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP APRIL LEASE 001-4020-524.45-30 173.02
NFPA Mfg Home Installation Pub 001-4020-524.31-01 46.75
ZENOVIC & ASSOCIATES Food Bank pe 01-25-04 001-4020-524.41-50 117.60
Community Developmt Dept Building Division Total: $659.96
Community Developmt Dept Department Total: $1,140.98
ADVANCED TRAVEL Tribal Summit-Schilke 001-5010-521.43-10 92.75
GLOBALSTAR USA 03-16 a/c 1.10012928 001-5010-521.42-10 79.82
Police Department Administration Division Total: $172.57
BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP Holsters,holders-Ensor 001-5021-521.35-01 51.14
Police Department Investigation Division Total: $5'1.14
ADVANCED TRAVEL Police Academy-Morse 001-5022-521.43-10 98.29
BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP Clothing AIIowance-Pening 001-5022-521.20-80 137.52
Clothing allowance-Riepe 001-5022-521.20-80 114.40
Clothing allowance-Morse 001-5022-521.20-80 69.47
Credit boots-Benedict 001-5022-521.20-80 -291.48
Uniform allowance-Riepe 001-5022-521.20-80 305.02
Narcotic tests 001-5022-521.31-01 93.24
Test kits 001-5022-521.31 -01 164.23
Flashlight parts 001-5022-521.31-01 106.84
Flashlight parts 001-5022-521.31-01 16.32
Badge 001-5022-521,31-11 108.80
Knife, holster 001-5022-521.35-01 177.83
Flashlight parts 001~5022-521,48-10 153.81
CLALLAM CNTY HUMANE SOCIETY MAR 2004 CONTRACT PAYMENT 001-5022-521.41-50 3,855.66
THERESA CHARON Rfd Duplicate pmt 001-5022-342.10-12 100.00
JACK LOWELL Clothing Allowance-Lowell 001-5022-521.20-80 358.97
WSPCA-WA ST POLICE CANINE ASSN Seminar-Miller, Brusseau 001-5022-521.43-10 240.00
2004 Dues-Miller, Brusseau 001-5022-521.49-01 40.00
Police Department Patrol Division Total: $5,848.92
BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP Nameplates 001-5026~521.31-11 29.21
F lashl ights 001-5026-521.35-01 239.47
PENINSULA AWARDS & TROPHIES Plaque,engraving 001-5026-521.35-01 45.44
Police Department Reserves & Volunteers Division Total: $314.12
Police Department Department Total: $6,386.75
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC 2574 MARCH COPIES 001-6010-522.45-30 76.12
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP APRIL LEASE 001-6010-522.45-30 212.83
KARON'S FRAME CENTER Framing 001-6010-522.31-01 79.54
Fire Department Administration Division Total: $368.49
OLYMPIC LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANERS Paint tarp 001-6020-522.31-01 17.04
SEAWESTERN INC Trousers 001-6020-522.20-80 275.31
Hydrant wrench 001-6020-522.31-01 64.83
5=~ Page 3
Date: 4/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
%r,?~'~ From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
SEAWESTERN INC... Bunker boots 001-6020-522.31-11 108.65
MSA Inlet 001-6020-522.35-01 276.92
5 MSA cylinder kits 001-6020-522.35-01 3,400.00
VERIZON WIRELESS 03-15 a/c 66424372000001 001-6020-522.42-10 10.69
03-15 a/c 66421143200001 001-6020-522.42-10 3.19
WA STATE PATROL Registration-Warren 001-6020-522.43-10 3,980.00
WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS INC Hearing tests 001-6020-522.41-50 146.60
Fire Department Fire Supression Division Total: $8,283.23
THE RAWLINGS COMPANY DEREK PARRISH 09/16/2002 001-6025-342.60-20 470.00
ADVANCED TRAVEL Paramedic Lecture-L Doyle 001-6025-526.43-10 366.05
Continuing Ed Medic-Hall 001-6025-526.43-10 242.60
BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP Clothing Allowance-Doyle 001-6025-526.20-80 195.19
Trousers-Hall 001-6025-526.20-80 126.15
CASCADE MEDICAL CENTER Paramedic Lecture Series 001-6025-526.43-10 390.00
CLALLAM CNTY EMS Medic 1 Advisory-April 001-6025-526.41-50 600.00
MOORE MEDICAL CORPORATION Safety glasses 001-6025-526.31-13 67.63
MOROZ, JAMES Teach First Aid 03-23 001-6025-526.31-08 200.00
Teach First Aid 03-26 001-6025-526.31-08 200.00
SYSTEMS DESIGN Ambulance billing svcs 001-6025-526.41-50 2,239.58
VERIZON WIRELESS 03-15 a/c 26439572400001 001-6025-526.42-10 10.42
Fire Department Medic I Division Total: $5,107.62
CORAL WHEELER Sparky Week Lunch-Wheeler 001-6030-522.31-01 81.08
Fire Department Fire Prevention Division Total: $81.08
BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP Credit uniforms-Bogues 001-6040-522.20-80 -328.79
WSAFC Manuals,Study Guides 001-6040-522.31-01 592.14
Fire Department Fire Training Division Total: $263.3,5
ANGELES PLUMBING INC Repair toilet 001-6050-522.48-10 75.30
Fire Department Facilities Maintenance Division Total: $75.30
GLOBALSTAR USA 03-16 a/c 1.10012919 001-6060-525.42-10 39.91
Fire Department Emergency Management Division Total: $39.91
Fire Department Department Total: $14,218.98
ADVANCED TRAVEL LaserFiche-Public Works 001-7010-532.43-10 53.00
APWA Spring Conf-GK 001-7010-532.43-10 137.28
WSDOT Workshop-Sperr 001-7010-532.43-10 83.50
Construction Documenting 001-7010-532.43-10 78.00
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN DEPUTY DIR POSITION AD 001-7010-532.44-10 135.00
AT&T WIRELESS 03-27 a/c 48966287 001-7010-532.42-10 7.89
COMPLETE LINE, THE Paper towels 001-7010-532.31-01 32.63
Hanging folders 001-7010-532.31-01 30.46
Paper 001-7010-532.31-01 55.72
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC 2575 MARCH COPIES 001-7010-532.45-30 19.44
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP APRIL LEASE 001-7010-532.45-30 64.96
HANSEN'S TROPHY ENGRAVE RETIREES PLAQUES 001-7010-532.31-01 115.77
Page4
Date: 4/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
GARY KENWORTHY Reimburse mileage 001-7010-532.43-10 25.75
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Postage-Rinehart 001-7010-532.42-10 14.40
VP CONSULTING INC LaserFiche Training 001-7010-532.41-50 1,683.57
WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS INC HEARING TEST 001-7010-532.43-10 10.48
Public Works-Gen Fnd Administration Division Total: $2,547.85
Public Works-Gen Fnd Department Total: $2,547.85
JACKSON'S SIGNS DESIGN DRAWINGS 001-8010-574.41-50 541.00
LINDBERG & SMITH ARCHITECTS INC REIMBURSMENT TOTALS 001-8010-574.41-50 211.38
NATIONAL REC & PARK ASSN 2004 MEMBERSHIP DUES 001-8010-574.49-01 215.00
RICOH BUSINESS SYSTEMS MONTHLY RICOH LEASE 001-8010-574.45-30 256.25
Parks & Recreation Administration Division Total: $1,223.63
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC 2576 MARCH COPIES 001-8012-555.45-30 82.35
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP APRIL LEASE 001-8012-555.45-30 171.40
QWEST 03-14 a/c 3604577004947 001-8012-555.42-10 85.10
03-20 a/c 206T217227465 001-8012-555.42-10 60.50
Parks & Recreation Senior Center Division Total: $399.35
Patty Reifenstahl REIMB RESALE ITEMS 001-8020-576.34-01 278.92
NORTHWEST SWIM SHOP RESALE SWIM ITEMS 001-8020-576.34-01 1,042.15
POOL RESALE ITEMS 001-8020-576.34-01 30.36
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Swim pass rfd-Woodside 001-8020-347.30-12 19.00
Parks & Recreation William Shore Pool Division Total: $1,370.43
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL BRICKS & CLAY PRODUCTS 001-8050-536.34-01 155.00
FRANK AND JEROLYN ROGERS Buy back L7,BIk 1 ,Sec VUG 001-8050-343.60-12 250.00
OLYMPIC LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANERS LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 001-8050-536.31-20 15.96
XEROX CORPORATION RENTAL/LEASE EQUIPMENT 001-8050-536.45-30 58.11
Parks & Recreation Ocean View Cemetery Division Totah $479.07
ADVANCED TRAVEL Pesticide training-Jim B 001-8080-576.43-10 249.33
ALL WEATHER HEATING & COOLING REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT 001-8080-576.48-10 188.27
REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT 001-8080-576.48-10 173.12
BLUE MOUNTAIN TREE SERVICE INC PW CONSTRUCTION & RELATED 001-8080-576.49-90 216.40
CED/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 001-8080-576.31-20 116.60
ELECTRICAL EQUIP 8, SUPPLY 001-8080-576.31-20 16.87
DIRECT SAFETY CO MARKERS, PLAQUES,SIGNS 001-8080-576.31-20 15.26
FAIRCHILD FLOORS BRICKS & CLAY PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20 2,793.29
FLOOR COVERING, INSTALLED 001-8080-576.31-20 464.18
IBM CORPORATION Credit Inv 3810189 001-8080-576.31-60 -744.42
COMPUTERS,DP 8, WORD PROC. 001-8080-576.31-60 890.27
COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPf 001-8080-576.31-60 155.81
LAKEVlEW PRODUCTS NW LLC LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20 497.96
METROCALL 03-09 A/C 298-A16289 001-8080-576.42-10 49.49
ORNAMENTAL STONE INC PRODUCTION&MANUFACTURING 001-8080-576.31-40 374.72
PACIFIC SAFETY SUPPLY INC CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-8080-576.31-20 189.84
=3Page 5
Date: 4/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
'>~" From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
PACIFIC SAFETY SUPPLY INC... FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-20 198.07
OPTICAL EQUIP ACESS& SUPP 001-8080-576.31-20 58.92
CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-8080-576.31-20 -189.84
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-20 -196.07
OPTICAL EQUIP ACESS& SUPP 001-8080-576.31-20 -58.92
PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-20 444.83
R & R PRODUCTS COMPANY LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20 242.78
THURMAN SUPPLY PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 001-8080-576.31-20 56.68
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 001-8080-576.31 ~20 11.88
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-576.31-20 0.71
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-576.31-20 1.43
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-576.31-20 0.69
WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS INC Hearing tests 001-8080-576.41-50 73.36
WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTRIB INC LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20 121.37
XEROX CORPORATION RENTAL/LEASE EQUIPMENT 001-8080-576.45-30 58.11
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC SIGN FOR ERICKSON PLAYFIE 001-8080-576.31-20 89.83
Parks & Recreation Park Facilities Division Total: $6,558.82
Parks & Recreation Department Total: $10,031.30
EVERGREEN BUILDING PRODUCTS HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8130-518.31-20 36.19
TAPE(NOT DP,SOUND,VIDEO) 001-8130-518.31-20 7.57
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8130-518.31-20 80.90
TAPE(NOT DP,SOUND,VIDEO) 001-8130-518.31-20 12.20
FAMILIAN NORTHWEST INC #3206 PIPE FITTINGS 001-8130-518.31-20 29.20
KNIGHT FIRE PROTECTION INC EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV 001-8130-518.48-10 667.59
THURMAN SUPPLY PIPE FITTINGS 001-8130-518.31-20 43.46
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8130-518.31-20 22.13
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 001-8130-518.31-20 94.91
XEROX CORPORATION RENTAL/LEASE EQUIPMENT 001-8130-518.45-30 58.12
Parks & Rec. Maintenance Custodial/Janitorial Svcs Division Total: $1,052.27
Parks & Rec-Maintenance Department Total: $1,052,27
General Fund Fund Total: $63,336.77
BREWER, DAVID Contract svcs-April 101-1430-557.49-90 100.00
Convention Center Convention Center Division Total: $100.00
Convention Center Department Total: $100.0(I
Convention Center Fund Fund Total: $100.0~
ADVANCED TRAVEL Spray School-Street Dept 102-7230-542.43-10 646.40
BLUE MOUNTAIN TREE SERVICE INC PW CONSTRUCTION & RELATED 102-7230-542.48-10 216.40
PW CONSTRUCTION & RELATED 102-7230-542.48-10 6,492.00
LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC ROAD/HVVY MATERIALS ASPHLT 102-7230-542.31~20 182.88
ROAD/HWY MATERIALS ASPHLT 102-7230-542.31-20 526.45
ROAD/HWY MATERIALS ASPHLT 102-7230-542.31-20 347.42
KEN RIDOUT Reimb mileage-Ridout 102-7230-542.43-10 95.40
"' "['- Date: 4/14/04
'~' ' City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
OLYMPIC LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANERS LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 102-7230-542.31-20 23.80
LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 102-7230-542.31-20 23.80
PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY 03-12 Woodhaven & Golf Rd 102-7230-542.47-10 15.26
03-11 SR101 & Euclid 102-7230-542.47-10 16.76
THURMAN SUPPLY CONCRETE & METAL CULVERTS 102-7230-542.31-20 23.59
WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS INC HEARING TESTS 102-7230-542.43-10 94.32
Public Works-Street Street Division Total: $8,704.48
Pubfic Works-Street Department Total: $8,704.48
Street Fund Fund Total: $8,704.48
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Reimburse meals-Smith 103-1511-558.43-10 26.31
Economic Development Economic Development Division Total: $26.31
Economic Development Department Total: $26.31
Economic Development Fund Total: $26.31
ABSOLUTE AIR INC Vacuum cleaner 107-5160-528.31-80 476.47
ADVANCED TRAVEL APCO E911 Forum-Riggins 107-5160-528.43-10 129.00
APCO E911 Forum-Simmons 107-5160-528.43-10 129.00
CAPTAIN T'S Shirts,embroidery 107-5160-528.20-80 156.89
Shirts,embroidery 107-5160~528.20-80 238.04
GLOBALSTAR USA 03:16 a/c 1.10012959 107-5160-528.42-10 39.91
MARATHON COMMUNICATIONS INC 03-20 a/c BWA0012014 107-5160-528.42-11 17.75
QWEST INTERPR{SE AMER{CA {NC 03-22 a/c WAM182-0205 107-5160-528.42-11 217.00
WA STATE PATROL Access user fee-lst Qtr 107-5160-528.48-10 3,609.51
Pencom Pencom Division Total: $5,013.57
Pencom Department Total: $5,013.57
Pencom Fund Fund Total: $5,013.57
CAPTAIN 'FS Shirts,screens 174-8221 ~574.31-01 165.55
Shirts,screens 174-8221-574.31-01 180.69
Shirts, screens 174-8221-574.31-01 103.33
Shirts,screens 174-8221-574.31-01 298.63
Andrew Wagner REFUND COED SOCCER 174-8221-34 7.60-20 30.00
Randy Kessinger WITHDREW FROM PROGRAM 174-8221-347.60-20 30.00
Recreation Activities Sports Programs Division Total: $808.20
ABREU, JOHN Officiate BB Tourney 174-8222-574.41-50 140.00
CAPTAIN T'S HOOPFEST TOURNEY T'S 174-8222~574.31-01 575.62
HALBERG, JAMES G Officiate BB Tourney 174-8222-574.41-50 180.00
H ELPENSTELL, SCOTT Scorekeep BB Tourney 174-8222-574.41-50 120.00
HOLLOWAY, MICHAEL Officiate BB Tourney 174-8222-574.41-50 120.00
JOHNSON, STEPHEN Officiate BB Tourney 174-8222-574.41-50 300.00
LINDQUIST, MATTHEW Scorekeep BB Tourney 174-8222-574.41-50 100.00
Jeff Dilley PERFORMANCE BOND REFUND 174-8222-347.60-21 75.00
Lenie Harem PERFORMANCE BOND REFUND 174-8222-347.60-21 75.00
Olympic Medical Sleep Center BB TOURNEY BOND RFD 174-8222-347.60-21 75.00
Page7
~.,c ,~ ,. Date: 4/14/04
'~ ~ City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
'>~' ~' From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
O'HARA, PATRICIA Scorekeep BB Tourney 174-8222-574.41-50 110.00
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Business meal-Estes 174-8222-574.31-01 27.61
ROONEY, RANDY L Officiate BB Tourney 174-8222-574.41-50 160.00
STONE, RICHARD Officiate BB Tourney 174-8222-574.41-50 160.00
ULIN, BRADLEY V Officiate BB Tourney 174-8222-574.41-50 230.00
WILSON, DONALD L Officiate BB Tourney 174-8222-574.41-50 160.00
Recreation Activities Special Events Division Total: $2,608.23
ALBERTSONS INC SUPPLIES 174-8224-574.31-01 10.73
SUPPLIES 174-8224-574.31-01 6.38
AT&T WIRELESS (DIGITAL) 03-27 a/c 0038436241 174-8224-574.42-10 34.02
MEMORIES TO GO SPRING BREAK SUPPLIES 174-8224-574.31-01 219.44
Port Angeles Olympic Kiwanis REIMB FOR TALENT AD 174-8224-574.44-10 25.00
OLYMPIC SKATE CENTER SPRING BREAK FIELD TRIP 174-8224-574.31-01 105.00
ORIENTAL TRADING CO INC SUPPLIES 174-8224-574.31-01 60.27
SUPPLIES 174-8224-574.31-01 17.10
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Supplies-Whitney 174-8224-574.31-01 5.63
WASHINGTON (DSHS), STATE OF ASP LICENSE-JEFFERSON,VBC 174-8224-574.31-01 280.00
Recreation Activities Youth/Family Programs Division Total: $763.57
Recreation Activities Department Total: $4,180.00
Park & Recreation Fund Fund Total: $4,180.00
FAIRCHILD FLOORS Carpets-Fire Hall 310-2920-594.48-10 2,338.84
SEAWESTERN INC Overhaul alarms 310-2920-594.35-01 377.38
Capital Projects-Finance Misc Small Projects Division Total: $2,716.22
Capital Projects-Finance Department Total: $2,716.22
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP March Shipping chgs 310-7919-594.49-90 8.76
Capital Projects. Pub Wks GF-Pub Wks Projects Division Total: $8.76
CLALLAM CNTY ROAD DEPT City Bridge Inspections 310-7930-595.41-50 1,536.50
Capital Projects-Pub Wks GF-Street Projects Division Total: $1,536.50
Capital Projects. Pub Wks Department Total: $1,545.26
Capital Improvement Fund Total: $4,261.48
CED/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST INC 1671 401-0000-141.40-00 108.74
DODARO, JO MANUAL DEPOSIT REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 125.00
JONES, RYAN MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 49.21
MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 49.00
ST LAURENT, MICHAEL UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 10.00
NEW PIG CORPORATION MATERIAL HNDLING&STOR EQP 401-0000-237.00-00 -90.90
TURNKEY MATERIAL HNDLING&STOR EQP 401-0000-237.00-00 -217.82
Division Total: $33.23
Department Total: $33.23
ADVANCED TRAVEL Energy Workshop-Kajfasz 401-7120-533.43-10 253.01
Public Works-Electric Power Resource Mgmt Division Total: $253.01
ADVANCED TRAVEL OTOC,HAZMAT mtgs-DI 401-7180-533.43-10 484.14
b~Page 8
Date: 4/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
'~ From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
AT&T WIRELESS 03-27 a/c 04748531602 401-7180-533.42-10 46.63
CED/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 45.44
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01 69.25
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01 6.41
MATERIAL HNDLING&STOR EQP 401-7180-533.48-10 108.20
MATERIAL HNDLING&STOR EQP 401-7180-533.48-10 120.55
CONDUIT,STRAPS 401-7180-533.48-10 97.81
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 141.08
CLEARING UP: NEWSDATA CORP Svce May - July 2004 401-7180-533.49-01 1,191.36
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC 2573 MARCH COPIES 401-7180-533.45-30 21.07
EVERGREEN BUILDING PRODUCTS Drywall 401-7180-533.48-10 19.89
GRAYS HARBOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE APPRENTICE TRAINING 401-7180-533.43-10 88.00
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP APRIL LEASE 401-7180-533.45-30 186.49
HANSEN SUPPLY COMPANY INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.31-20 102.08
HI-LINE Pads cabinet 401-7180-533.35-01 231.65
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01 496.52
JACO ANALYTICAL LABORATORY lNG FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 401-7180-533.48-10 108.00
KNOPP INC Current Amplifier Card 401-7180-533.35-01 408.45
PORT ANGELES SCHOOL DISTRICT 121 Rfd overpmt-Electrical 401-7180-379.00-00 62.88
NEW PIG CORPORATION MATERIAL HNDLING&STOR EQP 401-7180-533.35-01 1,199.38
NORTH CREEK ANALYTICAL INC ENVIRONMENTAL&ECOLOGICAL 401-7180-533.48-10 60.00
NORTHWEST PUBLIC POWER ASSN NW Energy W/S-Kajfasz 401-7180-533.43-10 55.00
OLYMPIC LAUNDRY& DRY CLEANERS MATERIAL HNDLING&STOR EQP 401-7180-533.48-10 20.10
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 401-7180-533.48-10 20.10
MATERIAL HNDLING&STOR EQP 401-7180-533.48-10 20.10
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Filing fees-Funston 401-7180-533.49-90 63.00
PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY 03-22 Lauridsen Blvd & L 401-7180-533.33-50 21.14
04-01 2110 Glass RD 401-7180-533.33-50 183.58
RUUD LIGHTING INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.47-10 106.30
SCHUCK'S AUTO PARTS Red lens tape 401-7180-533.31-20 3.56
THURMAN SUPPLY ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 12.96
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 24.89
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 43.27
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 15.87
TURNKEY MATERIAL HNDLING&STOR EQP 401-7180-533.35-01 2,874.10
VERIZON WIRELESS 03-15 a/c 56453528700001 401-7180-533.42-10 36.88
WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS INC HEARING TESTS 401-7180-533.43-10 136.24
Public Works-Electric Electric Operations Division Total: $8,932.37
AVNET ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS DIV SUPPLIES 401-7188-594.65-10 2,582.30
Public Works-Electric Electric Projects Division Total: $2,582.30
Public Works-Electric Department Total: $11,767.68
Electric Utility Fund Fund Total: $11,800.91
· _. c~'.~E~].5~.:. Date: 4/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
'~" From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
FAMILIAN NORTHWEST INC #3206 PiPE FITTINGS 402-0000-141.40-00 277.44
PIPE FITTINGS 402-0000-141.40-00 69.25
Division Total: $346.69
Department Total: $346.69
ADVANCED TRAVEL WOW Workshops-WP B 402-7380-534.43-10 402.87
WOW Workshops-Edgington 402-7380-534.43-10 383.87
AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE 03-15 a/c 0584912554001 402-7380-534.42-10 43.31
BRANOM INSTRUMENT COMPANY RPR. BACKFLOW KIT 402-7380-534.48-10 176.50
MIDWEST BACKFLOW RPR. 402-7380-534.48-10 55.89
EDGE ANALYTICAL TESTING&CALIBRATION SERVI 402-7380-534.48-10 37.00
FAMILIAN NORTHWEST INC #3206 PIPE FITTINGS 402-7380-534.34-02 599.41
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP March Shipping chgs 402-7380-534.49-90 8.34
PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY 03-23 Crown Z Water Rd 402-7380-534.47-10 16.92
QWEST 03-23 a/c 206T411255315 402-7380-534.42-10 64.15
SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE FLOOR MAINT MACHINE,PARTS 402-7380-534.31-20 40.01
SPARLING INSTRUMENTS INC SUPPLIES 402-7380-534.34-02 2,288.43
THURMAN SUPPLY BLANKET PURCHASE ORDER 402-7380-534.31-20 65.48
MATERIAL HNDLING&STOR EQP 402-7380-534.34-02 36.79
PIPE AND TUBING 402-7380-534.34-02 2.65
SUPPLIES 402-7380-534.34-02 17.39
VERIZON WIRELESS 03-23 a/c 26421490800002 402-7380-534.42-10 36.95
03-15 a/c 26421490800001 402-7380-534.42-10 34.94
WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS INC HEARING TESTS 402-7380-534.43-10 104.80
Public Works-Water Water Division Total: $4,415.70
Public Works-Water Department Total: $4,415.70
Water Fund Fund Total: $4,762.3!]
HALEY & ASSOCIATES INC, G W STEAM & HOT WATER FITTING 403-0000-237.00-00 -13.74
Division Total: -$13.74
Department Total: -$13.74
ADVANCED TRAVEL WW Environment-Waldron 403-7480-535.43-10 431.82
ANGELES ELECTRIC INC PUMP STATION #1 403-7480-535.31-20 73.58
BECKWITH & KUFFEL EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV 403-7480-535.31-20 321.96
BRANOM INSTRUMENT COMPANY SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-20 458.72
CHEMSEARCH PAINTS,COATINGS,WALLPAPER 403-7480-535.31-20 207.74
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC 2582 MARCH COPIES 403-7480-535.31-01 21.72
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP March Shipping chgs 403-7480-535.42-10 42.31
FLOW PRODUCTS INC PUMPS & ACCESSORIES 403-7480-535.35-01 852.77
HALEY & ASSOCIATES INC, G W STEAM & HOT WATER FITTING 403-7480-535.31-20 2,974.40
K & L SUPPLY INC EQUIP. MAINT. AUTO,TRUCK 403-7480-535.31-20 109.23
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 403-7480-535.31-20 200.93
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-20 116.98
PACIFIC NW CLEAN WATER ASSOC ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 403-7480-535.49-01 60.00
~Page 10
~,~4 Date: 4/14/04
'- City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
PENTAIR PUMP GROUP EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV 403-7480-535.31-20 1,843.73
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Ice,Meal reJmb-Raymond 403-7480-53531-20 14.68
Certified mail-Young 403-7480-535.42-10 5.34
QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES INC MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 403-7480-535.31-20 351.65
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 403-7480-535.48-10 1,028.98
SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE FLOOR MAINT MACHINE,PARTS 403-7480-535.35-01 108.18
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-20 2.33
S U PP LIES 403-7480-535.31-20 -2.33
THURMAN SUPPLY WATER SEWAGE TREATMENT E¢403-7480-535.31-20 4.98
PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 2.95
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 403-7480-535.31-20 20.94
TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES CONSULTING SERVICES 403-7480-535.41-50 191.00
VERIZON WIRELESS 03-15 a/c 36469358100001 403-7480-535.42-10 12.74
03-15 a/c 76423363300001 403-7480-535.42-10 22.97
WA STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY TESTING FEE-BECKLEY 403-7480-535.43-10 70.00
LAB ACCREDITATION FEE 403-7480-535.49-90 805.00
WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS JNC HEARING TESTS 403-7480-535.43-10 73.36
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Wastewater Division Total: $10,428.66
Public Works-VVW/Stormwtr Department Total: $10,428.66
Wastewater Fund Fund Total: $10,414.92
CDW GOVERNMENT INC COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERlPH404-0000-237.00-00 -35.56
WASTE NEWS WAST E NEWS 404-0000-237.00-00 -4.02
Division Total: -$39.58
Department Total: -$39.58
DEN-REE PRODUCTION S ADVE RTISI N G 404-7580-537.44-10 250.00
J M FLOORING OFFICE CARPET 404-7580-537.44-10 271.63
OLYMPIC LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANERS MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCTS 404-7580-537.48-10 27.59
LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 404-7580-537.48-10 27.00
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 404-7580-537.48-10 27.59
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS PDN SUBSCRIPTION 404-7580-537.44-10 29.15
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Photo processing-Stromski 404-7580-537.44-10 6.16
RADIO PACIFIC INC ADVERTISING 404-7580-537.44-10 540.00
WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS INC HEARING TESTS 404-7580-537.43-10 73.36
WASTE NEWS WASTE NEWS 404-7580-537.44-10 53.02
Public Works-Solid Waste Solid Waste-Collections Division Totah $1,305.50
Public Works-Solid Waste Department Total: $1,305.50
Solid Waste-Collections Fund Total: $1,265.92
ADVANCED TRAVEL Bio-Cycle Conf-Hart 405-7585-537.43-10 533.14
CDW GOVERNMENT INC COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPH 405-7585-537.31-60 469.17
COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPH405-7585-537.31-60 938.34
COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPH405-7585-537.31-60 -71.12
NORTHWEST BUSINESS FINANCE LLC TIRE RECYLING 405-7585-537.48-10 850.00
Date:
4/14/04
~'"'~%.! City of Port Angeles
~[ City Council Expenditure Report
From: 3/27/0# To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
OVERALL LAUNDRY SERVICES INC COVERALL SERVICE 405-7585-537.31-01 86.76
WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS INC HEARING TESTS 405-7585-537.43-10 73.36
Public Works-Solid Waste Solid Waste-Landfill Division Total: $2,879.65
Public Works-Solid Waste Department Total: $2,879.65
Solid Waste-Landfill Fund Total: $2,879.65
C & F INSULATION City rebate-Alger 421-7121-533.49-86 1,365.75
ELECTRIC SERVICE INC City rebate-Cornell 421-7121-533.49-86 630.00
EVERWARM HEARTH & HOME INC City rebate-Smith 421-7121-533.49-86 67.03
City rebate-Hubert 421-7121-533.49-86 921.86
GLASS SERVICES CO INC City rebate-Dziak 421-7121-533.49-86 127.75
City rebate-Dopp 421-7121-533.49-86 717.04
City rebate-Patrizzi 421-7121-533.49-86 1,133.00
City rebate-Fineout 421-7121-533.49-86 1,195.25
City rebate 421-7t21-533.49-86 472.00
CHERYL WINDSHEIMER City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00
JAMES B SCOFIELD City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00
JOHN R RIGG City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 302.81
LISA WELCH City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00
MICHELLE LYNN City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 40.00
RAGNOR AND TRACY LASSUS City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00
RICHARD SISNEROS City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 28.00
PENINSULA HEAT INC City rebate-Austin 421-7121-533.49-86 1,000.00
Public Works-Electric Conservation Loans Division Total: $8,200.49
Public Works-Electric Department Total: $8,200.49
Conservation Loans/Grants Fund Total: $8,200.4~t
POTELCO INC Prof svcs pe 03-19 451-7188-594.65-10 33,914.10
Prof svcs pe 03-19 451-7188-594.65-10 33,914.10
Public Works-Electric Electric Projects Division Total: $67,828.20
Public Works-Electric Department Total: $67,828.20
Electric Utility CIP Fund Total: $67,828.2~
CH2M HILL INC Prof svcs pe 02-27 452-7388-594.41-50 42,415.78
Public Works-Water Water Projects Division Total: $42,415.78
Public Works-Water Department Total: $42,415.78
Water Utility CIP Fund Total: $42,415.78
FAMILIAN NORTHWEST INC #3206 SUPPLIES 453-7488-594.35-01 264.10
GEOTIVITY INC P rof svcs 453-7488-594.41-50 4,328.00
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Wastewater Projects Division Total: $4,592.10
Public Works. VVW/Stormwtr Department Total: $4,592.10
Waste Water Utility CIP Fund Total: $4,592.10
PE'FrlT OIL COMPANY Diesel 501-0000-141.20-00 371.40
Division Total: $371.40
~e 12
Date: 4/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
;~ From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
Department Total: $371.40
ADVANCED TRAVEL PFMA mtg-Hoffman 501-7630-548.43-10 177.20
NAFA Fleet Mgt-Hoffman 501-7630-548.43-10 642.19
Pick up Dump truck-RH 501-7630-548.43-10 177.05
AFFORDABLE STORAGE CONTAINERS LEAK-PROOF CONTAINERS 501-7630-548.31-10 1,523.20
ANGELES AUTO ALECTRIC AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 162,30
CLINICARE OF PORT ANGELES INC HEALTH RELATED SERVICES 501-7630-548.43-10 75,00
COLE SCREENPRINTINC AUTO & TRUCK ACCESSORIES 501-7630-548.34-02 694.09
EVERGREEN COLLISION CENTER EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 135,67
FMH MATERIAL HANDLING SOLUTIONS AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 230.37
LARSON GLASS TECHNOLOGY INC EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.48-10 530.67
LEE MYLES TRANSMISSIONS RECONDITION TRANSMISSION 501-7630-548.34-02 1,438.50
RECONDITION TRANSMISSION 501-7630-548.48-10 293.63
OVERALL LAUNDRY SERVICES INC Laundry svcs Garage-Mar 501-7630-548.49-90 223.76
PE'I-I'IT OIL COMPANY March Gasoline EQ0009 501-7630-548.32-10 38.93
March Gasoline EQ0014 501-7630-548,32-10 22.04
March Gasoline EQ0015 501-7630-548.32-10 58,30
March Gasoline EQ0018 501-7630-548,32-10 47.65
March Gasoline EQ0023 501-7630-548.32-10 30.93
March Gasoline EQ0027 501-7630-548.32-10 44.35
March Gasoline EC 0028 501-7630-548.32-10 20.80
March Gasoline E¢ 0029 501-7630-548.32-10 43.23
March Gasoline E¢ 0034 501-7630-548.32-10 55.16
March Gasoline E¢ 0035 501-7630-548.32-10 64.38
March Gasoline EC 0036 501-7630-548.32-10 111.97
March Gasoline E¢ 0040 501-7630-548.32-10 95.54
March Gasoline Ed 0041 501-7630-548.32-10 106.61
March Gasoline E¢ 0042 501-7630-548,32-10 56.73
March Gasoline Ed 0044 501-7630-548.32-10 163.20
March Gasoline E¢ 0045 501-7630-548.32-10 136.06
March Gasoline E¢ 0046 501-7630-548,32-10 87.90
March Gasoline Ed 0047 501-7630-548.32-10 105.43
March Gasoline E¢ 0048 501-7630-548.32-10 101.42
March Gasoline E¢ 0053 501-7630-548.32-10 103.16
March Gasoline E¢ 0054 501-7630-548.32-10 83.79
March Gasoline Ed 0065 501-7630-548.32-10 134.90
March Gasoline EQO078 501-7630-548.32-10 100.73
March Gasoline EQO080 501-7630-548.32-10 101.58
March Gasoline EQO083 501-7630-548.32-10 196.05
March Gasoline EQ0084 501-7630-548.32-10 140,70
March Gasoline EQO086 501-7630-548.32-10 142.36
March Gasoline EQ0087 501-7630-548.32-10 118.10
Page13
Date: 4/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
PE'FFIT OIL COMPANY... March Gasoline EQ0088 501-7630-548.32-10 122.29
March Gasoline EQ0089 501-7630-548.32-10 169.89
March Gasoline EQ0090 501-7630-548.32-10 61.61
March Gasoline EQ0095 501-7630-548.32-10 105.32
March Gasoline EQ0096 501-7630-548.32-10 39.51
March Gasoline EQ0138 501-7630-548.32-10 81.65
March Gasoline EQ0139 501-7630-548.32-10 84.38
March Gasoline EQ0143 501-7630-548.32-10 16.61
March Gasoline EQ0148 501-7630-548.32-10 16.25
March Gasoline EQ0151 501-7630-548.32-10 35.32
March Gasoline EQ0153 501-7630-548.32-10 19.42
March Gasoline EQ0191 501-7630-548.32-10 22.34
March Diesel EQ0007 501-7630-548.32-11 74.36
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Vehicle licensing-Benoff 501-7630-548.34-02 22.75
SCHUCK'S AUTO PARTS AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 12.38
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 7.37
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 3.64
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 11.65
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548,34-02 43.28
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 11.45
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 6.41
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 5.05
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 21.62
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 -21.62
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 5.15
AUTO & TRUCK ACCESSORIES 501-7630-548.34-02 35.04
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 60.64
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 11.08
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 3.78
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 186.10
AUTO MAJOR TRANSPORTATION 501-7630-548.34-02 7.35
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 7.35
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 64.91
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 14.00
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 4.70
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 9.39
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 21.53
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 43.17
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 41.09
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 8.60
TRANCO TRANSMISSIONS INC AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 153.30
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.48-10 335.42
~=2Page 14
c~ '~'~:~ Date: 4/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
'~-~ From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
VERIZON WIRELESS 03-15 A/C 26421490800001 501-7630-548.31-01 116.27
03-15 a/c 26421490800001 501-7630-548.42-10 68.59
WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS INC HEARING TESTS 501-7630-548.43-10 52.40
Public Works-Equip Svcs Equipment Services Division Total: $11,038.42
Public Works-Equip Svcs Department Total: $11,038.42
Equipment Services Fund Total: $11,409.82
Elizabeth Strait TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 502-2081-518.43-10 317.57
VP CONSULTING INC LaserFiche Training 502-2081-518.41-50 160.34
Finance Department Information Technologies Division Total: $477.9t
Finance Department Department Total: $477.91
Information Technology Fund Total: $477.91
AWC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST A )ril Premium 503-1631-517.46-30 114,434.42
A )ril Premium 503-1631-517.46-30 1,810.67
A )ril Premium 503-1631-517.46-30 41.75
A )ril Premium 503-1631-517.46-30 38.41
A )ril Premium 503-1631-517.46-30 5,272.80
A )ril Premium 503-1631-517.46-32 1,153.12
A ~ril Premium 503-1631-517.46-32 251.16
BAILEY, JAMES A Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 58.70
BALSER, FRED Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 58.70
Disability Board-March 503-1631-517.46-35 313.25
BALSER, SHARYN Disability Board-March 503-1631-517.46-35 208.49
BISHOP, VIRGIL Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 129.10
CAMERON, KENNETH Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 91.90
CAMPORINI, RICHARD Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 65.60
Disability Board-March 503-1631-517.46-35 91.00
GLENN, LARRY Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 58.70
GROOMS, MICHAEL Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 66.60
JOHNSON, DONALD G Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 66.60
JOHNSON, HARRY Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 66.60
JORISSEN, ROBERT R Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 58.70
LINDLEY, JAMES K Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 54.00
LOUCKS, JASPER Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 133.20
MIESEL, PHIL Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 61.60
Erick Zappey MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 503-1631-517.41-51 35.00
Gary Funston MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 503-1631-517.46-30 60.92
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 503-1631-517.46-31 314.08
Jerry Benoff MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 503-1631-517.46-30 87.56
MORGAN, ROY Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 65.60
NW ADMIN TRANSFER ACCT April premium-March Hours 503-1631-517.46-33 19,063.60
April premium-March Hours 503-1631-517.46-33 21,703.40
April premium-March Hours 503-1631-517.46-33 1,121.25
"b~g~ag e 15
,,.;~¢~ ~,~; ~. Date: 4/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
'" ;~' From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
NW ADMIN TRANSFER ACCT... April premium-March Hours 503-1631-517.46-34 10,877.65
SWEATT, JOHNNIE Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 65.70
THOMPSON, BRUCE Reimb Medicare prem-April 503-1631-517.46-35 50.00
Disability Board-March 503-1631-517.46-35 200.00
TURTON. F GALE Disability Board-March 503-1631-517.46-35 156.37
Self Insurance Other Insurance Programs Division Total: $178,386.20
HEALTHCARE MGMT ADMNSTRS INC April premium 503-1637-517.46-01 1,767.68
03-30 Dental claims EFT 503-1637-517.46-01 2,906.20
04-06 Dental claims EFT 503-1637-517.46-01 5,383.33
Self Insurance Medical Benefits Division Total: $10,057.21
GATES SERVICE COMPANY, FRANK WORKERS COMP TPA-2ND QTR 503-1661-517.41-40 2,500.00
Self Insurance Worker's Compensation Division Total: $2,500.00
ALICE SPRY Full & Final pmt-claim 503-1671-517.49-98 1,500.00
HIGHER GROUNDS EXPRESSO CORP Claim settlement 503-1671-517.49-98 6,969.72
JOHN PAJOR Claim settlement 503-1671-517.49-98 75.00
SUMMIT LAW GROUP PLLC LABOR REPRESENTATION-FEB 503-1671-517.41-50 2,332.66
Self Insurance Comp Liability Division Total: $10,877.38
Self Insurance Department Total: $201,820.79
Self-Insurance Fund Fund Total: $201,820.79
AWC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST April Premium 602-6221-517.46-35 5,265.00
BRAUN, GARY Reimb Medicare prem-April 602-6221-517.46-35 66.60
Disability Board-March 602-6221-517.46-35 38.00
CAMPBELL. MALCOLM D Reimb Medicare prem-April 602-6221-517.46-35 65.60
EVANS, SIDNEY Reimb Medicare prem-April 602-6221-517.46-35 66.60
Disability Board-March 602-6221-517.46-35 86.00
RYAN, ED Reimb Medicare prem-April 602-6221-517.46-35 54.00
Disability Board-March 602-6221-517.46-35 49.00
Fireman's Pension Fireman's Pension Division Total: $5,690.80
Fireman's Pension Department Total: $5,690.80
Firemen's Pension Fund Total: $5,690.8{3
AFLAC Floor cleaner 652-8630-575.31-06 -56.97
Floor cleaner 652-8630-575.31-06 56.97
QWEST 03-23 a/c 206T418577331 652-8630-575.42-10 60.50
03-14 a/c 3604573532775 652-8630-575.42-10 41.71
SENIUK, JAKE Misc supplies 652-8630-575.31-01 406.75
Gloves 652-8630-575.31-20 21.75
Transport Art-Gasoline 652-8630-575.32-10 47.41
Artist Hospitality 652-8630-575.41-50 41.15
Transport Art,meals 652-8630-575.43-10 141.86
Transport Art,U-Haul 652-8630-575.45-30 83.08
Esther Webster/Fine Arts Esther Webster/Fine Arts Division Total: $844.21
Esther Webster/Fine Arts Department Total: $844.21
6=Z~age 16
Date: 4/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
'>;~" From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
Esther Webster Fund Fund Total: $844.21
AFLAC March premium-HL942 920-0000-231.53-10 156.96
March premium-HL942 920-0000-231.53-10 -156.96
AFSCME LOCAL 1619 P/R Deductions pe 03-28 920-0000-231.54-40 84.00
P/R Deductions pe 03-28 920-0000-231.54-,40 168.00
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON CITIES SUPP LIFE - APRIL 920-0000-231.53-30 526.70
DIMARTINO/WSCFF DISABILITY P/R Deductions pe 03-28 920-0000-231.53-40 784.59
FIREFIGHTER'S LOCAL 656 P/R Deductions pe 03-28 920-0000-231.54-30 1,311.00
IBEW LOCAL 997 P/R Deductions pe 03-28 920-0000-231.54-20 596.00
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT P/R Deductions pe 03-28 920-0000-231.56-20 1,558.47
P/R Deductions pe 03-28 920-0000-231.56-20 169.85
PERS P/R Deductions pe 03-28 920-0000-231.51 -11 3,470.18
PLOVIE LAW FIRM PS P/R Deductions pe 03-28 920-0000-231.56-30 122.66
POLICE ASSOCIATION P/R Deductions pe 03-28 920-0000-231.55-10 232.00
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 589 P/R Deductions pe 03-28 920-0000-231.54-10 2,434.00
UNITED WAY (PAYROLL) P/R Deductions pe 03-28 920-0000-231.56-10 279.97
WSCCCE AFSCME AFL-GlO P/R Deductions pe 03-28 920-0000-231.54-40 3,243.82
Division Total: $14,981.24
Department Total: $14,981.24
Payroll Clearing Fund Total: $14,981.2zl
Totals for check period From: 3/27/04 To: 4/9/04 $475,007.74
5Page17
66
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
DATE: APRIL 20, 2004
To: CITY CouNC~/
FROM: Marc ConnelI~irector of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE REVISION: PERMITTING THE USE OF LIQUOR AT CERTAIN RENTAL
FUNCTIONS AT THE PORT ANGELES FINE ART CENTER
Summary.: The current ordinance regarding use regulations for the Port Angeles Fine Art
Center prohibits the sale or use of liquor, including beer and wine at any activities. The Fine
Arts Center is increasingly being sought out as a venue for a variety of corporate events, and
other special occasions such a weddings and receptions. The Center must routinely deny
booking these events because of the current language contained within the ordinance. As a
consequence the Center looses a valuable source of income for operating capital and the benefit
derived from public exposure to the Fine Art Center by outside users. The change in this
ordinance will contribute to an on-going City Council goal of financial stability for the Fine Art
Center.
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the ordinance of the City of Port
Angeles, Washington, revising the regulations regarding the sale or use of liquor during
events for the Port Angeles Fine Art Center, to be consistent with the Vern Burton Center
and the Senior Services Community Center, and amending Ordinance 2632 as amended
and Chapter 12.16 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
Background / Analysis:
In the year 2000 impacts to the economy and the stock market severely impacted the operating
capital for the Port Angeles Fine Art Center. Until then the Fine Art Center relied largely on
proceeds from investments for its operating revenue. It became evident that this strategy was
unreliable and that creating other more reliable sources of revenue were necessary to stabilize the
Center's financial condition while at the same time preserve the level of services that the
community had come to expect and the level of service that Esther Webster had intended when
she gifted her estate to the City for the express purpose of providing the community with a place
for the fine arts.
Since that time the organizations supporting the Fine Art Center have jointly developed a series
of strategies creating new sources of regular operating capital. These strategies or sources
include but are not limited to:
o Grants
o NewFundraisers 67
o Corporate Donations
o Corporate Sponsorships
o Retail Sales
Notably absent from this list is rental income. This is due in large part because this potential use
has not been actively marketed and as a result has historically been a limited source of income
for the Fine Arts Center. With the increasing local popularity of the Fine Art Center and
improved exposure as a result of new marketing and promotional programs and an already solid
regional reputation, the requests for Center rental is growing significantly. This demand has
been limited however as many interested groups find that they cannot serve alcohol at their
events as they can at other city facilities available for rent such as the Veto Burton Center and
the Senior Services Community Center. The increased demand for the use of the Fine Arts
Center corresponds to the efforts on the part of the staff and support organizations such as the
Trustees, Friends of the PA_FAC, and the PAFAC Foundation's focus on corporate sponsorship
and marketing which has markedly raised the profile of the institution. The adoption of this
revision to the municipal code will also create consistency in operation regulations between the
department's primary rental facilities.
The Friends of the PAFAC and the PAFAC Trustees have endorsed this proposed change in the
municipal code.
Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 417.4551 or via e-mail at
mconnelly~cityofpa.us
C:\COUNCIL. park board vacancies.WPT
68
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, revising the
regulations regarding the sale or use of liquor during events for the Port
Angeles Fine Art Center, to be consistent with the Veto Burton Center
and the Senior Services Community Center, and amending Ordinance
2632 as amended and Chapter 12.16 of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN as follows:
.Section 1. Ordinance 2632 as amended and Chapter 12.16 of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code are hereby amended by amending PAMC 12.16.030 to read as follows:
12.16.030 Use RegulationsJ The following regulations shall apply to the use of the Port
Angeles Fine Art Center:
A. The hours shall be from 8:00 AM to 11:00 PM.
· ?' .1- -- '· ' ~ ....... f liq
oJ. u~¢ &C[i-v'i[iC$ -" ..... .a in the ~--~ ' .... '--~.'-':--.~¢- Ail ,..,..L~.The sale or use o uor, including
beer and wine, shall be permitted at activities allowed in the Port Angeles Fine Art Center, provided
that the applicant for the permit to use the facility shall furnish proof that all permits required by the
Washington State Liquor Control Board have been obtained and that the provisions outlined in
PAMC 12.08.050 A-F have been complied with.
C. All applicable Federal, State and local laws, codes and regulations shall be
complied with.
D. The Parks and Recreation Director, hereafter also referred to as "Director", shall
recommend such other regulations as are necessary for use of the facility, which regulations shall
be adopted by the City Council.
E. The above use regulations may be modified only by special permission of the
City Manager with the right of appeal to the City Council.
Section 2 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after the date of
publication.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
-1-
69
Council held on the 20th day of April, 2004.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dennis C. Dickson, Acting City Attorney
PUBLISHED: April 25, 2004 By Summary
G:~egaI_Backup\ORDINANCES &KESOLUTIONS~2004-03.ord.wpd
March 31, 2004
-2-
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
DATE: APRIL 20, 2004
To: C TY coum, ,: /
FROM: Marc Connell~lJ~9~rector of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: ESTABLISHING FEES FOR USE OF THE PORT ANGELES
FrNE ARTS CENTER
Summary.: This amendment is largely a housekeeping measure. Chapter 12.16 of the Port
Angeles Municipal Code identifies use regulations for the Port Angeles Fine Art Center and
references a schedule of fees contained within chapter 3.70. Presently chapter 3.70 contains no
schedule of fees for use of the Port Angeles Fine Art Center. This amendment will correct this
issue.
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the ordinance of the City of Port
Angeles, Washington, by adding a new section 3.70.065 which establishes use fees for the
Port Angeles Fine Arts Center, and amending Ordinance 3130 as amended and Chapter
3.70 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
Background / Analysis:
City ordinance provides for the use of the Port Angeles Fine Arts Center for various types of
events and establishes that fees will be collected for its use yet no schedule of fees exist in the
municipal code for the Port Angeles Fine Arts Center. The schedule of fees for the Fine Arts
Center is considerably simpler than the schedule of fees established for the Vern Burton Center
and the Senior Services Community Center as its primary purpose is to provide a supplemental
source of funding for operations at the Fine Arts Center. Additionally, the simplified fee
structure is easier to administer and is consistent w/th fees for similar private facilities in the
community available for special functions. The adoption of this amendment will also provide a
mechanism for recovering the costs associated with any garbage collection as a result of events.
For example, Solid Waste now routinely bills for services such as trash collection provided to
other city operations. This additional cost has had an impact upon general fund operations such
as the Vern Burton Center, the Senior Services Center and Permanent Fund operations such as
the Esther Webster Trust since each event generates a significant amount of waste for which the
cost of pick-up is now being charged back to the corresponding division or fund.
The Friends of the PAFAC and the PAFAC Trustees have endorsed this proposed change in the
municipal code.
Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 417.4551 or via e-mail at
mconnelly~cityofpa.us 7 1
72
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, establishing
use fees for the Port Angeles Fine Art Center, and amending Ordinance
3130 as amended and Chapter 3.70 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Ordinance 3130 as amended and Chapter 3.70 of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code are hereby amended by amending PAMC 3.70 by adding a new section, 3.70.065, establishing
use fees for the Port Angeles Fine Art Center to read as follows:
FEES
Sections:
3.70.010 Finance Department Fees
3.70.020 City Clerk Fees
3.70.030 Ocean View Cemetery Fees
3.70.040 Parks & Recreation Department Fees
3.70.050 Vern Burton Memorial Community Center Fees
3.70.060 Port Angeles Senior Services and Community Center Fees
3.70.065 Port Angeles Fine Art Center Fees
3.70.070 Planning Department Fees
3.70.080 Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Sign Permit Fees.
3.70.090 Fire Department Fees
3.70.095 Fire Department Fees - Medic I Program
3.70.100 Light Utility Inspection & Review Fees
3.70.105 Light Utility Service Fees
3.70.110 Public Works Department (Department) Fees and Deposits
3.70.120 Police Department Fees
3.70.900 Waiver of Fees
3.70.905 Money Back Guarantee Program
3.70.065 Port Angeles Fine Art Center Fees.
A. Rates for all users
1. Rental Rate
a. $50.00 per hour with a minimum 2 hour rental
2. Reservation Fee
a. $50.00 non-refundable fee applied to rental rate
3. Damage Deposit
a. $500.00 cash deposit or surety bond
4. Garbage Collection
a. $ 5.00 (90 gal) ($ 4.58/ea pickup)
b. $11.00 (300 gal) ($15.88/ea pickup)
Section 2 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after the date of
publication.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 20th day of April, 2004.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dennis C. Dickson, Acting City Attorney
PUBLISHED: April 25, 2004 By Summary
G:~egal_Back up\ORDIN ANCES&RESOLUTIONS~-004-04.ord.wpd
April 13, 2004
74
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, establishing
use fees for the Port Angeles Fine Arts Center, and amending Ordinance
3130 as amended and Chapter 3.70 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Ordinance 3130 as amended and Chapter 3.70 of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code are hereby amended by amending PAMC 3.70 by adding a new section, 3.70,065, establishing
use fees for the Port Angeles Fine Arts Center to read as follows:
FEES
Sections:
3.70.010 Finance Department Fees
3.70.020 City Clerk Fees
3.70.030 Ocean View Cemetery Fees
3.70.040 Parks & Recreation Department Fees
3.70.050 Vern Burton Memorial Community Center Fees
3.70.060 Port Angeles Senior Services and Community Center Fees
3.70.065 Port Angeles Fine Arts Center Fees
3.70.070 Planning Department Fees
3.70.080 Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Sign Permit Fees.
3.70.090 Fire Department Fees
3.70.095 Fire Department Fees - Medic I Program
3.70.100 Light Utility Inspection & Review Fees
3.70.105 Light Utility Service Fees
3.70.110 Public Works Department (Department) Fees and Deposits
3.70.120 Police Department Fees
3.70.900 Waiver of Fees
3.70.905 Money Back Guarantee Program
-1-
3.70.065 Port Angeles Fine Arts Center Fees.
A. Rates for all users
1. Rental Rate :
a. $50.0.0 per hour with a minimum 2 hour rental-
2. Reservation Fee '~
a. $50.00 non-refundable fee appliedto rental kate
3. Damage Deposit ~
a. $500.00 cash deposit or surety bond
4. Garbage Collection
a. $ 5.00 (90 gal)
b. $16.00 (300 gal)
Section 2 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after the date of
publication.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 20th day of April, 2004.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dennis C. Dickson, Acting City Attorney
PUBLISHED: April 25, 2004 By Summary
G \LegaI_Backup\ORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONS~004-04 ord wpd
April 13, 2004
-2-
WAShiNGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNClL MEMO
DATE: APRIL 14, 2004
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Timothy J. Smith, Economic Development Direc~''~
SUBJECT: Resolution in Support of Kalakala Alliance Foundation
Summa~: Representatives of the Kalakala Alliance Foundation, Port Angeles Business
Association (PABA), and several others have requested the City consider an expression of support for
the restoration and re-developement of the M.V. Kalakala. The Alliance proposes the privately funded
restoration and redevelopment as a tourism destination facility within the City of Port Angeles. The
request was forwarded to the City Council Community and Economic Development Committee (CED)
for consideration. At their direction, staffhas developed a resolution in support of the restoration and
and redevelopment of the historic ferry as proposed by the Alliance and PABA.
Recommendation: The City Council Community and Economic Development Committee
recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution supporting the efforts of the
Kalakala Alliance Foundation to fully restore the M.V. Kalakala as the core ora new, multi-use.
privately funded tourism facility within the City of Port Angeles.
Background / Analysis: On April 6t~, 2004, representatives of the Kalakala Alliance Foundation, and
Port Angeles Business Association (PABA) requested the City Council's consideration of an
expression of support and encouragement for the Kalakala Alliance Foundation and for their plans to
restore and develop the M.V. Kalakala as a tourism destination within the City of Port Angeles.
Following their presentation several Port Angeles residents and property owners spoke in favor of the
request made by the Alliance and PABA. As a part of their verbal presentation and written request
submitted to the City, both the Alliance and PABA representatives indicated that the restored ferry
would be a unique addition to the city which would enhance our tourism industry and that the
restoration, relocation and operation of the renovated ferry would be accomplished with private
funding as opposed to public tax dollars (see attached letters).
The request was forwarded to the City Council Community and Economic Development Committee
(CED) for consideration. At the instruction of the CED, a resolution (attached) in support of the
requests made on this issue has been prepared. The proposed resolution has been crafted to match
the requests as presented, and includes certain conditions and qualifications which match the requests
made by both the Alliance and PABA representations.
75
76
Port. eIe. s
Bus,ness t ssoc c t on
P_O. Box 545. Port tin,tics. Wt~ 98562
April 6, 2004
Members o£th¢ City Council
Ci~ of?orr Angeles
32] East 5t~ Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Honorable Council Members:
The fundamental purpose of the Port Angeles Business Association is promoting
economic development and improvement of the Port Angeles area business climate.
Considering our regional economic situation, we believe that it is vital that we support
any private enterprise that would help us diversify our local economy and stimulate job
growth. Recently we learned of the KALAKA_LA ALLIANCE FOUNDATION plan to
bring the historic Art Deco ferry boat M.V. KALAKALA back to Port Angeles to serve as
the core of a new multi-use facility. We believe that facility will provide a unique new
attraction on the City's waterfront.
Coupled with other planned waterfront projects such as The Oak Street Hotel and
Conference Center, The Gateway Center, and the Port Angeles Heritage Underground
tours, the restored, internationally-recognized KALAKALA would bring another
important attraction that would enhance the tourism economy that is developing within
the City.
We understand that the foundation's plan is to completely renovate the ferry using private
funds before it is located here. Further we understand that they expect no financial
support from the Port Angeles public sector.
The Port Angeles Business Association supports the KALAKALA ALLIANCE
FOUNDATION in its efforts to restore the ferryboat to its former grandeur, and in their
plan to permanently lOcate the refurbished vessel in Port Angeles.
We urge the Port Angeles City Council's consideration of an expression of support and
encouragement for the KALAKALA ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, and for their plans to
develop the KALAKALA as a tourist destination within the City of Port Angeles.
Thank you ~or your consideration.
Sincerely yours, ,
Dr. Gerald Hauxwell, President
Port Angeles Business Association
Cc File
Kalakala Alliance Foundation
77
-'- KALAKALA ALLIANCE FOUNDATION
222 N. Lincoln St., Suite 104, Port Angeles, WA 98362
= - · -. Office: (360) 565-0400 / Info: (360) 928-3245 / Fax: (360) 565-0410
........ -- ; .... ' email: info@kalakala, org
'.. www. kalakala.org
April g, 2004
' . City of Port Angeles
- _ '7~,~-- .
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members,
The Kalakala Alliance Foundation is writing to thank you for allowing us to present to
you various private interests and public testimony in support of the Kalakala project
asking for your endorsement for establishing the City of Port Angeles as the future home
port of the Kalakala. Your acceptance and welcome for the Kalakala as a home port will
help our future efforts throughout the development process.
The City liabilities or financial responsibilities related to our proposal of the Kalakala
home pr~t project will be absolutely no different than any other private development
project'.. ~he various private business development efforts for our project will follow all
City planning, local ordinances, regional permits, local shmie, l.ine permitting, and any
other regulatory applications or permitting processes And/ho financial responsibilities
or indebtedness will be required by the city, or any city tax dollars required to help
finance or secure the Kalakala project funding.
'The Kalakala project development and feasibility process will be 100% privately funded,
master planned, developed, and marketed. The Kalakala home port project will become
an economic growth element that the city 'may want to review regarding other impacts
related to both future primary and secondary community economic impacts.
The Kalakala home port project will create many full-time and temporary part-time future
jobs, and will have the capabilities of providing many other secondary economic spin-
offs that will help to create a more stable economic and diversified economy within the
city. Also, the project will generate outside tourist dollars, and will keep many local
future spendable income dollars to stay within the city limits(not exported like other
businesses with corporate offices outside the state).
We hope that the leadership within City of Port Angeles represented by your city council
members accepts our future Kalakala home port project.
Best regards,
Kalakala Alliance Foundation - Steve Rodrigues - President/Founder
04/08/04 78 3:54PM
RESOLUTION NO. ~
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, expressing support for the efforts of the Kalakala
Alliance Foundation to restore the Kalakala and locate it in Port
Angeles.
WHEREAS, the City supports the continued development and diversification of the local
and regional economy, and
WHEREAS, the City appreciates opportunities to develop and diversify its economy
through the investment of private enterprise, and
WHEREAS, the City finds that the support of historically significant cultural tourism
infrastructure and programs are a valued component of the City's economic development and
diversification strategy, and
WHEREAS, the Kalakala Alliance Foundation has publicly presented plans to fully
restore and refurbish the historic ferryboat M. V. Kalakala as the core ora new multi-use facility,
and
WHEREAS, the Foundation has announced that Port Angeles is its preferred home port
for the restored Kalakala facilities, and
WHEREAS, the Foundation's development plans for the Kalakala project include
compliance with all City, State and Federal planning and permitting guidelines as may be
necessary for a project of this nature, and
WHEREAS, the Foundation's intent is to accomplish the continued planning, permitting,
restoration, and location of the restored ferry on privately owned land utilizing 100% private
funding, and
1
WHEREAS, no public financial responsibilities or indebtedness or any City of Port
Angeles tax dollars will be required to help finance or secure the Kalakala project funding, and
WHEREAS, the restored Kalakala facilities could help to further develop and diversify
the City's local and regional tourism industry;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles
that the City supports the Kalakala Alliance Foundation in its efforts to privately restore the
Kalakala to its former grandeur and to locate the refurbished vessel in Port Angeles.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 20th day of April, 2004.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dennis C. Dickson, Acting City Attorney
G:kLegal_Backup\ORD1NANCES&RESOLUTIONShR2004-6.wpd
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, expressing support for the efforts of the Kalakala
Alliance Foundation to restore the Kalakala and locate it in Port
Angeles.
WHEREAS, the City supports the continued development and diversification of the local
and regional economy, and
WHEREAS, the City appreciates opportunities to develop and diversi~' its economy
through the investment of private enterprise, and .
WHEREAS, the City finds that the sUpport of historically significant cultural tourism
infrastructure and programs are a valued component of the City's economic development and
diversification strategy, and
WHEREAS, the Kalakala Alliance Foundation has publicly presented plans to fully
restore and refurbish the historic ferry boat M. V. Kalakala as the core ora new multi-use facility,
and
WHEREAS, the Foundation has announced that Port Angeles could be its preferred home
port for the restored Kalakala facilities, and
WHEREAS, the Foundation's development plans for the Kalakala project include
compliance with all City, State and Federal planning and permitting guidelines as may be
necessary for a project of this nature, and
WHEREAS, the Foundation's intent is to accomplish the continued planning, permitting,
restoration, and location of the restored ferry on privately owned land utilizing 100% private
funding, and
1
WHEREAS, no public financial responsibilities or indebtedness or any City of Port
Angeles tax dollars will be required to help finance, secure or sustain the Kalakala project
funding, and
WHEREAS, the restored Kalakala facilities could help to further develop and diversify
the City's local and regional tourism industry; and
WHEREAS, this resolution of support shall not be considered as an endorsement by the
City for the purpose of soliciting donations or investment in the alliance or the Kalakala project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bythe City Council of the City of Port Angeles
that the City supports the Kalakala Alliance Foundation in its efforts to privately restore the
Kalakala to its former grandeur andqt, g loctite the refurbished vessel in Port Angeles.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 20th day of April, 2004.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dennis C. Dickson, Acting City Attomey
G 5LegaI_Backup\ORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONSW,2004-6.wpd
p'OR, NGE, L,E S
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 20, 2004
To: CiTY COUNCIL
FROM: SUE ROBERDS, ASSISTANT PLANNER
SUBJECT: PETITION FOR VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
PORTION OF WOLCOTT STREET
Summary_: Request for vacation of right-of-way.
Recommendation: Following the scheduled public hearing, the Department of Community
Development recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission's
recommendation and pass the attached ordinance vacating the right-of-way as proposed. Council
should adol2t the attached findings and conclusions in support of that action.
Background / Analysis:
A valid petition for the vacation of a portion of the Wolcott Street right-of-way situated
between East Fourth Street and the Fourth/Fifth Alley was submitted on December 22, 2003, by Mr.
and Mrs. Fred DeFrang, who own 100% of the abutting property. At its February 17, 2004, meeting,
the Real Estate Committee considered the proposed street vacation with regard to compensation and
proposed compensation based on several factors relative to the topography and constraint of a sewer
line situated within the right-of-way. Following that consideration, compensation was set at
$.20/square foot for that property that is unbuildable due to topography and $2.66/square foot for the
remainder of the site not otherwise encumbered with the sewer line or topographical restriction.
Total compensation is then valued at $5,896.
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing in consideration of the petition at its
April 14, 2004, regular meeting and forwarded a recommendation to approve the request in its
minutes of that meeting, an excerpt of which is attached for your review. The Department's report
and background information are attached for your review, and staff will be available for questions
at the April 20, 2004, public hearing.
' ~ u~ 1~o b er~ s, 'A~i s-t a~nt Planner
Attachments: Ordinance and map
4/14/04 Minutes excerpt
Department report
Application petition
81
82
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, vacating
a portion of Wolcott Street in Port Angeles, Clallam County,
Washington.
WHEREAS, a petition is on file with the City of Port Angeles to vacate a portion of
Wolcott Street in Port Angeles, Washington described as follows:
Wolcott Street abutting Lot 1, Block 182 and Lot 9, Block 183,
Port Angeles, Clallam County, Washington.; and
WHEREAS, the City Council initiated said vacation by Resolution No. 3-04; and
WHEREAS, street vacations are categorically exempt from the requirements of the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) rules as set forth in WAC 197-11-800(2)(h); and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the City Council following public notice
pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW; and
WHEREAS, said vacation appears to be of benefit to and in the interest of the public;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1 - Vacation. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, the
following described right-of-way as shown on the attached Exhibit A is hereby vacated:
Wolcott Street abutting Lot 1, Block 182 and Lot 9, Block 183,
Port Angeles, Clallam County, Washington. as shown on the
attached map.
Section 2 - Conditions. The City shall retain a twenty-four hour unrestricted 20 foot
utility easement. No construction will occur in the vacated right-of-way over the existing sewer
facilities without relocation of the utilities at the direction of the City's Public Works and Utilities
Department. Relocation or undergrounding of utilities shall be at the applicant's expense.
-1-
Section 3 - Compensation. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.030, the compensation required for
the vacation of this street is $5,896.00.
Section 4 - Quit Claim Deed. The owners of abutting property entitled to the vacated
street, pursuant to RCW 35.79.040, may present a quit claim deed to the City of Port Angeles for
execution by the Mayor, who is hereby authorized and directed to execute such quit claim deed.
Section 5 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the execution and
recording of the quit claim deed and at that time the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish this
Ordinance and to file a certified copy with the Clallam County Auditor and the Clallam County
Assessor.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the __ day of April, 2004.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dennis C. Dickson, Acting City Attorney
PUBLISHED: April 25, 2004 By Summary
G:~Legal_Backup\O RDINANC ES&RESO LUTIONS~2004-05.ord.wpd
April 5, 2004
2
86
Planning Commission Minutes
April 14, 2004
Page 2
STREET VACATION PETITION - STV 03-05 - DeFRANG, Portion of Wolcott
Street located between East Fourth Street and the 4/5 Alley. (Continued from March
24, 2004.)
Director Brad Collins reviewed the Department Report recommending approval of the right-
of-way vacation as proposed. Director Collins, Assistant Planner Roberds, and Engineer Mahlum
responded to questions regarding the Public Works and Utilities Department requirement for a sewer
line easement and what construction activities would be allowed within that easement area. Chair
Hewins opened the public hearing.
Steve Zen ovic, 519 South Peabody, responded as to his understanding of the encroachments
that would be allowed within the sewer easement and had no further questions.
There being no further testimony, Chair Hewins closed the public heating.
Following discussion as to the buildable area and the site location, Commissioner Philpott
moved to recommend approval of the vacation citing the following conditions, findings and
conclusions in support of the recommendation:
Conditions:
1. A sensitive area tract, as prescribed in Chapter 15.20 PAMC, shall be established for
any portion of the subject lot that is located within the ravine and/or its buffer.
2. A 20' easement shall be retained over the existing sewer line. Construction within
the easement shall not occur except roof eaves may be allowed to overhang the
easement no more than 36 inches.
Findings:
1. A valid petition requesting the vacation of that portion of unused right-of-way known
as Wolcott Street located south of East Fourth Street between East Fourth Street and
the 4/5 Alley was submitted to the City of Port Angeles on December 22, 2003, by
Mr. and Mrs. Fred DeFrang. The property is described as abutting Lot 9, Block 183,
and Lot 1, Block 182, Townsite of Port Angeles, which are owned by the petitioners.
2. The site is zoned RS-7, Residential Single Family and is adjacent to property zoned
PBP, Public Buildings and Parks, due to the location of White's Creek Ravine.
3. The subject right-of-way is undeveloped but does contain a sewer line situated in
approximately the center of the right-of-way extending the entire length of the
property.
4. The City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map were reviewed for consistency
with the proposed vacation o fright-of-way. The site is designated LDR, Low Density
Residential, on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map with the adjacent
property being designted Open Space (OS). Growth Management Element Goal A
and Policies 1, la, and 16; Land Use Map Goal, Policies, and Objective Goal A and
Policy 2, Policy B.2; Conservation Element Goal A and Policy A. 1 and A.2, Goal B,
and Policies B. 1, B.2, B.4, and B.8; Residential Goals and Policies Goal B and Policy
4; and Open Space Goals, Policies, and Objectives Goal I, Policy 2 were found to be
relevant to the petition request.
5. The City Council's Real Estate Committee met on February 16, 2004, to establish a
value for the unopened fight-of-way. The subject right-of-way is 9,800 square feet
Planning Commission Minutes
~qpril 14. 2004
Page 3
in area of which 4,000 is partially buildable based on topographic and sewer line
easement constraints which diminishes the buildable area to approximately 2600
square feet. That area of the site that is unbuild able was valued at $.20/square foot
with the build able area being valued at $2.66/square foot.
6. A geoteclmical review was conducted on the site by Zenovic and Associates in 2003.
A substantial ecology block wall must be constructed to support minimal
development on the site. An environmentally sensitive areas review will be required
prior to any work in the area of the environmentally sensitive area buffer (that area
at the top of the White's Creek Ravine) that is contained on the site.
7. The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from a State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) review per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the Washington Administrative
Code.
8. City departments reviewed the petition and had no concerns regarding the fight-of-
way vacation with a condition that a sewer line easement be retained. Those
comments were included in the conditions recommended for approval of the
vacation.
9. The site was posted and required publication appeared in the Peninsula Daily News
on March 5, 2004.
10. The Port Angeles Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed street
vacation on March 24, 2004.
11.This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council.
12. The City Council set a hearing date by resolution establishing a public hearing date
for consideration of the petition request for April 20, 2004.
Conclusions:
A. Traffic pattems on surrounding streets and utility services will not be negatively
impacted by the vacation.
B. Low density residential development patterns in the area will not be affected by the
proposed vacation. Development of the lot which contains an environmentally
sensitive area is minimized by the site's topography and the encumbrance of a sewer
line easement that traverses the site from south to north. The right-of-way will be
incorporated with the residential building lot to the east which will enlarge that
residential building area as the site cannot be developed as a stand alone residential
lot due to the topography and sewer line easement.
C. The proposal is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive
Plan, specifically Comprehensive Plan Growth Management Element Goal A and
Policies 1, 1.a, and 16; Land Use Map Goal, Policies, and Objective Goal A and
Policy 2, and Goal B, Policies B. 1, B.2, B.4, and B.8; Residential Goals and
Policies Goal B and Policy 4; and Open Space Goals, Policies, and Objectives Goal
I, Policy 2
D. As conditioned, vacation of the property will ensure that site development observes
the City's regulations as they relate to the development of properties that are
considered steep slopes, are environmentally sensitive, or are needed for public use
while placing the right-of-way on the City's tax roles and is therefore in the public
interest.
Commissioner Honnold seconded the motion which passed 5 - 0.
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Chair Hewins and Planning Commissioners
FROM: Sue Roberds, Assistant Planner
DATE: March 24, 2004
RE: STV 03-05
APPLICANT: Mr. and Mrs. Fred DeFrang
OWNERS: Same
REQUEST: Vacation of right-of-way
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department recommends that the Planning
Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for street vacation
request STV 03-05 based on 2 conditions, 12 findings, and 4 conclusions found in
Attachment A.
BACKGROUND:
A valid petition requesting vacation of a portion of unopened City right-of-way was
submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Fred DeFrang on December 22, 2003. The petition requests
vacation of that portion of Wolcott Street located east of the Whitens Creek Ravine south of
East Fourth Street between East Fourth Street and the 4/5 Alley. The property is described
as abutting Lot 1, Block 182 and Lot 9, Block 183 Townsite of Port Angeles. The applicants
own both abutting properties. The petition is attached as Attachment "A" to this report.
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC COMMENT:
· The Public Works and Utilities Department has no concerns with the proposed street
vacation request other than to state that vacation of the right-of-way will require a 20'
easement over the existing sewer line. Building may occur within the easement area
except for 5' each side of the sewer line itself. Roof eaves may overhang within the
eastment.
· The Fire Department has no objection to the proposed street vacation.
89
Community Development Department Staff Report March 24, 2004
STV 03-05 Page 2
· The Police Department has no concems with the proposed street vacation.
· The Community Development Department: Due to the location of the right-of-way at the
east side of the White's Creek Ravine, and the existing sewer line and required easement,
only a small portion of the right-of-way is buildable. The total right-of-way consists of
9,800 square feet of area of which only approximately 4,000 square feet is buildable due
to the sloping topography, and of that 4,000 square feet of area, 1600 square feet is
encumbered with a sewer easement which leaves two buildable strips of property
approximately 1200 square feet each along each side of the actual sewer line (see attached
map).The Public Works Department has stated that building eaves may extend over the
minimum 5' sewer setback line so a structure wall could be placed on that 5' building line
(shown in red on attached map). Given the rise in elevation from East Fourth Street, it is
highly unlikely that the property could support a residential structure without significant
investment. In order to construct the proposed accessory structure on the site, specific
engineering will require the construction an ecology block wall on the ravine property to
provide a stable building area. Due to a rise in elevation from East Fourth Street, access
is available from the alleyway which dead ends at the site. With proper engineering the
site could support an accessory structure if combined through a zoning lot covenant with
the adjacent property to the east which is the desired development by the petitioner who
owns the adjacent residential property.
Areas of potential impact of the proposal are summarized as follows:
Traffic Patterns: Traffic patterns in the area will not be affected by the vacation. The site
is accessed by way of a dead end alley with access from East Fourth Street being
somewhat restricted due to the rise in elevation from East Fourth Street.
Development Patterns: The proposal will not affect development of other sites in the area
as the right-of-way that would be eliminated is not required for service to developable
areas. Vacation of the right-of-way would result in the subject lot becoming minimally
developable for an accessory use.
Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The site contains an environmentally sensitive area
being the eastern edge of the White's Creek Ravine. Geotechnical review of the site
indicated that a minimal buildable area can be created on the site with significant ecology
block structural work at the top of the bank.
Public Health, Safety and Welfare: Vacation of the proposed right-of-way will not
interfere with the public's health, safety or welfare. The right-of-way has no value to the
City as public space other than to allow crossing by a sewer line which will remain an
easement for future maintenance needs and returns no revenue in the form of taxes while
in public ownership. There is no utility development proposed in association with this
street vacation at this time. Vacation of the right-of-way would provide the site with
adequate area to contain an accessory structure if combined with an adjacent residential
property use.
The Building Division had no comment of the proposed street vacation.
· Per required legal notification procedures, the site was posted in the Peninsula Daily
News on March 5, 2004
9O
Community Development Department Staff Report Mamh 24, 2004
STV 03-05 Page 3
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE:
A major portion of the subject property is designated as Low Density Residential
(LDR) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Residential Single Family (RS-7) on
the City's Zoning Map. That portion of Wolcott Street that exists from the top of the
White's Creek Ravine west is designated as Open Space (OS) and Public Buildings and
Parks (PBP).
The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed in its entirety in consideration of the proposed street
vacation, and the following goals and policies were found to be most relevant to the proposal:
Growth Management Element
Goal,4. To manage growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial to the community
as a whole, is sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals and is consistent with the State of
Washington's Growth Management Act.
Policy ! In all its actions and to the extent consistent with the provisions of this
comprehensive plan, the City shall strive to implement the following goals of the State Growth
Management Act:
Policy !a Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public
facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner.
Land Use Map Goal, Policies, and Ob/ective
Goal A. To guide current and future development within the City in a manner that
provides certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the
challenges and opportunities of the future.
Policy 2 All land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council and/or any of its
appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan and its land use map.
Residential Goals and Policies Goal B To have a community where residential development
and use of the land are done in a manner that is compatible with the environment, the
characteristics of the use and the users, and the desired urban design of the City.
Policy 2 Single family lots should be of reasonable shape and should have
access provided by an alley or by a local access street or a collector arterial.
Policy 4 All residential developments should be encouraged to preserve and
capitalize on existing unusual, unique, and interesting natural, historic, archaeological, and/or
cultural features, should preserve and utilize natural vegetation, should utilize and preserve
scenic views, should maximize southern exposures and solar efficiency, should offer protection
from prevailing winds, and should be designed to minimize energy use.
Open Space Goals, Policies, and Objectives Goal I Polic_¥ 2 The City shall limit the use of and
access to such natural areas to only that which does not degrade the significance of the area and
which protects the rights of property owners.
Conservation Element Goals, Policies and Objectives Goal A To create and maintain a
community with a high quality of life where the land is used in a manner that is compatible with
the area's unique physical features, its natural, historical, archaeological, and cultural amenities,
and the overall environment.
Community Development Department Staff Report March 24, 2004
STV 03-05 Page 4
Policy A. 1 The City should require all development, including the location and design of
all structures and open space areas, to be compatible with the unique physical features and
natural amenities of the land and complement the environment in which it is placed, while
recognizing the rights of private ownership.
Policy A.2 The City should promote compatibility between the land and its use by
regulating the intensity of the land use.
Goal B To protect and enhance the area's unique physical features, its natural, historical,
archaeological, and cultural amenities, and the overall environment.
Policy B. I The City should further the public interest by protecting and enhancing the
area's unique physical features, valuable natural historical, archaeological, and cultural amenities,
and the overall environment, while recognizing the rights of private ownership.
Policy B. 2 The City should maintain and preserve its unique physical features and
natural amenities, such as creeks, streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands, ravines, bluffs, shorelines, and
fish and wildlife habitats.
Policy B. 4 Building density should decrease as natural constraints increase
Policy B. 8 The City should preserve uniquely featured lands which still exist in their
natural states and which are notable for their aesthetic, scenic, historic, or ecological features and
should prohibit any private or public development which would destroy such qualities, while
recognizing the rights of private ownership.
The proposed street vacation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals,
policies, and maps, specifically with those herein previously noted.
The established residential development pattern in the area will not be negatively
impacted by the proposal which will allow the construction of a detached garage/shop in
association with the adjacent residential development.
The area is contained adjacent to White's Creek which is designated as an
environmentally sensitive area. The Port Angeles Municipal Code (Section 15.24) requires
specific setbacks and buffers from environmentally sensitive areas to any new development.
Topographical site constraints of the site limit both the building footprint and where a
structure may be located on the site because the western edge of the site is located at the
east edge of the White's Creek ravine and an existing sewer line is located in the middle of
the right-of-way extending the entire length of the lot. Required setbacks from the top of the
White's Creek Ravine and the topography of the area limit the area of the site that can be
developed. Required buffers established in Section 17.24 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code
for environmentally sensitive areas will protect the environmentally sensitive nature of the site.
Development of the site will need to be in accord with best management practices for such areas.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
review per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the Washington Administrative Code. Although certain
exemptions do not apply in the case of environmentally sensitive areas, the Wolcott Street right-
of-way does not contain any environmentally sensitive areas.
This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council has
scheduled a public hearing for consideration of the petition at its April 20, 2004,
regular meeting.
Attachments: Petition
Site maps 92
Community Development Department Staff Report March 24, 2004
STV 03-05 Page 5
ATTACHMENT A
Conditions, Findings, and Conclusions in Support of
Street Vacation Petition - STV 03-05
Conditions:
1. A sensitive area tract, as prescribed in Chapter 15.20 PAMC, shall be established
for any portion of the subject lot that is located within the ravine and/or its buffer.
2. A 20' easement shall be retained over the existing sewer line. Construction within
the easement shall not occur except roof eaves may be allowed within 5' of the
actual sewer line.
Findings:
1. A valid petition requesting the vacation of that portion of unused right-of-way
known as Wolcott Street located south of East Fourth Street between East Fourth
Street and the 4/5 Alley was submitted to the City of Port Angeles on December
22, 2003, by Mr. and Mrs. Fred DeFrang. The property is described as abutting
Lot 9, Block 183, and Lot 1, Block 182, Townsite of Port Angeles, which are
owned by the petitioners.
2. The site is zoned RS-7, Residential Single Family and is adjacent to property
zoned PBP, Public Buildings and Parks, due to the location of White's Creek
Ravine.
3. The subject right-of-way is undeveloped but does contain a sewer line situated in
approximately the center of the right-of-way extending the entire length of the
property.
4. The City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map were reviewed for consistency
with the proposed vacation of right-of-way. The site is designated LDR, Low
Density Residential, on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map with the
adjacent property being designted Open Space (OS). Growth Management
Element Goal A and Policies 1, la, and 16; Land Use Map Goal, Policies, and
Objective Goal A and Policy 2, Policy B.2; Conservation Element Goal A and
Policy A. 1 and A.2, Goal B, and Policies B.1, B.2, B.4, and B.8; Residential
Goals and Policies Goal B and Policy 4; and Open Space Goals, Policies, and
Objectives Goal I, Policy 2 were found to be relevant to the petition request.
5. The City Council's Real Estate Committee met on February 16, 2004, to establish
a value for the unopened right-of-way. The subject right-of-way is 9,800 square
feet in area of which 4,000 is partially buildable based on topographic and sewer
line easement constraints which diminishes the buildable area to approximately
2600 square feet. That area of the site that is unbuild able was valued at
$.20/square foot with the build able area being valued at $2.66/square foot.
6. A geotechnical review was conducted on the site by Zenovic and Associates in
2003. A substantial ecology block wall must be constructed to support minimal
development on the site. An environmentally sensitive areas review will be
required prior to any work in the area of the environmentally sensitive area buffer
(that area at the top of the White's Creek Ravine) that is contained on the site.
Community Development Department Staff Report March 24, 2004
STV 03-05 Page 6
7. The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from a State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) review per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the Washington
Administrative Code.
8. City departments reviewed the petition and had no concerns regarding the right-
of-way vacation with a condition that a sewer line easement be retained. Those
comments were included in the conditions recommended for approval of the
vacation.
9. The site was posted and required publication appeared in the Peninsula Daily
News on March 5, 2004.
10. The Port Angeles Planning Commission held a public heating on the proposed
street vacation on March 24, 2004.
11. This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council.
12. The City Council set a heating date by resolution establishing a public heating
date for consideration of the petition request for April 20, 2004.
Conclusions:
A. Traffic patterns on surrounding streets and utility services will not be negatively
impacted by the vacation.
B. Low density residential development patterns in the area will not be affected by
the proposed vacation. Development of the lot which contains an environmentally
sensitive area is minimized by the site's topography and the encumbrance of a
sewer line easement that traverses the site from south to north. The right-of-way
will be incorporated with the residential building lot to the east which will enlarge
that residential building area as the site cannot be developed as a stand alone
residential lot due to the topography and sewer line easement.
C. The proposal is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's
Comprehensive Plan, specifically Comprehensive Plan Growth Management
Element Goal A and Policies 1, 1 .a, and 16; Land Use Map Goal, Policies, and
Objective Goal A and Policy 2, and Goal B, Policies B.1, B.2, B.4, and B.8;
Residential Goals and Policies Goal B and Policy 4; and Open Space Goals,
Policies, and Objectives Goal I, Policy 2
D. As conditioned, vacation of the property will ensure that site development
observes the City's regulations as they relate to the development of properties that
are considered steep slopes, are environmentally sensitive, or are needed for
public use while placing the tight-of-way on the City's tax roles and is therefore in
the public interest.
ATTACM~w;N'I' "~"
CITY OF PORT ANGELES ~ ~- ,~r, ,? ,i ,- ,-
STREET VACATION PETITIO ~T DEC 2, ~'~
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
TO: The CiO;'Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washin~on - Dept. of Community Development
Come now the undersigned petitioners and pursuant to .Chapter 35.79 RCW respectfully show:
1. The undersigned petitioners request that the following described portion of ~)c> / ~ ¢ 7--'7-
the City of Port Angeles be vacated pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW (Tegally describe the
property requested for vacation below). ~z~,~T/~,e_~_2? ~/~/~ / ~ ~_ /_~ £ /~ 2 7-P~z
2. Each of the undersigned petitioners is the owner of an interest in real estate abutting on the above
described area.
3. ~ persons own propm-t-y abutting on said area.
4. The names and addresses ofpropm'ty owners abutting on said areas are as follows: Name Addz'ess
5. The undersigned petitioners constitute more than two thirds of the owners of said abutting
property.
WHEP,_EFORE, the petitioners ask that proceedings be commenced hereon for the vacation
of said area of said ffx)c~/(z~ ~ Street/'aa.l~y in the manner prescribed in Chapter 35.79 1R.CW.
Respectfully submitted,
7,20
"LOCATION AND DEPTH Ol'
~ L~TILITIES ARE APPROXIMA'FE,
[XACT PO~;ITION AND DEPTH NOT Gl IASANTEED.
~ ..
.
GRAD, SEWERS
· - PpAN NOS ...........................
L. 1. D.'s ............................. ~-~-~' ...............................................
BOOKS ...............................................................
/~. . .......
98
pORTANGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CiTY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: APRIL 20, 2004
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Brad Collins, Community Development Director ~
SUBJECT: Amendments to the Parking Ordinance, PAMC Chapter 14.40
Summary: In 2001 the City began a comprehensive review of Municipal Code Amendments
including the Parking Ordinance through a Citizen Code Advisory Committee. Through a series of
public meetings and public hearings, the Planning Commission made recommendations to the City
Council in 2002. Except for the amendments to the Parking Ordinance, PAMC Chapter 14.40, those
Municipal Code Amendments have been reviewed and adopted by the City Council. In August,
2002, the City Council directed'staffto rewrite the Parking Ordinance, and those amendments have
been under review of the Community & Economic Development Committee. The directions of the
City Council have been followed, and issues concerning administration of the City's parking
regulations between the Planning Commission, the Port Angeles Downtown Association, and the
CED Committee have been resolved in the proposed amendments contained in the draft Ordinance.
Recommendation: Following close of the public hearing continued from the March 16, 2004,
City Council meeting, the Department of Community Development recommends that the City
Council adopt the revised Parking Ordinance as read by title.
Background / Analysis:
The original revisions recommended for the City's Parking Ordinance primarily focused on
updating the parking requirements for various land uses as they have changed since the Parking
Ordinance was first adopted in 1966. Issues were raised by the City Council, and the Community
& Economic Development Committee directed a rewrite of the parking regulations to allow for
alternate methods for calculating and providing the number of parking spaces required for
developments throughout the City. Concerns of the Planning Commission and the Port Angeles
Downtown Association regarding how the new parking regulations would be administered were
addressed to the satisfaction of all parties of interest, and the amendments to the City's Parking
Ordinance, Port Angeles Municipal Code Chapter 14.40, are ready for adoption.
Attachment: Draft Parking Ordinance
99
1 O0
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
modifying the requirements of the City's off-street parking
ordinance by encouraging lower impact development with less
impervious surfaces and alternative transportation strategies,
while encouraging businesses to determine and meet their own
parking requirements and amending Ordinance 1588 as amended
and Chapter 14.40 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission undertook a review of the Parking Ordinance,
Port Angeles Municipal Code Chapter 14.40, and made its recommendations on May 22, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the City Council Community and Economic Development Committee has,
for over a year per the directions of the City Council on August 27, 2002, reviewed and revised the
Parking Ordinance, Port Angeles Municipal Code Chapter 14.40; and
WHEREAS, a number of administrative issues concerning parking regulations have been
resolved between the Planning Commission, the Port Angeles Downtown Association, and the
Community and Economic Development Committee; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted public hearings on the proposed amendments
on June 17, 2002, July 16, 2002, August 20, 2002, March 16, 2004, and April 20, 2004;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Ordinance 1588 as amended and Chapter I4.40 of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows:
-1-
101
OFF-STREET PARKING
Sections:
14.40.010 Purpose.
14.40.,,,,_,020 Definitions.
14.40.020030 Parking Space Requirements - Generally.
14.40.,~,.~,040 Parking Space Requirements for Uses in "*- ~' ........... a Ci_ty
Approved Parking and Business Improvement Area
14.40.050 Transportation Demand Management Assessment.
14.40.090060 Mixed Uses.
14.40.100070 Cooperative Provi$ionsParking Agreements.
14.40.110080 Parking Space Requirement Modification - New Uses in New Building.
14.40.120090 Parking Space Requirement Modification - New Uses in Existing
Structures.
14.40.130100 Parking Space Requirement Modification - Expansion of Existing Uses
in Existing Structures.
14.40.140110 Parking Space Modification Requirements - Existing Uses in Existing
Structures.
14.40.150120 Improvement of Parking Spaces.
14.40.t-60130 Parking Space Requirements - Variances.
14.40.170140 Building Permits.
14.40.180150 Use of Parking Spaces.
14.40.185160 Parking Lot Activities Standards.
14.40.4-90170 Revocation of Permit - Appeals.
14.40.180 Decisions of City Staff or the Planning Commission - Appeals.
14.40.~,~,,A90 Violations.
14.40.010 Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to assure adequate provisions for
public access are made in the development of new land use and in the change of use of an existing
building. Off-street parking is only one of the provisions that needs to be considered to avoid
significant adverse impacts on surrounding private properties and public infrastructure. This parking
ordinance encourages transportation demand management to achieve low impact development as an
alternative to off-street minimum parking requirements for each commercial, industrial, and public
and institutional land use. The Ci_ty recognizes that each business can have a varie.ty of
transportation strategies, facilities, and services instead of satisfying access solely by single occupant
vehicles (SOV). Many businesses are unique and, therefore, can best determine the minimum
102
parking requirements needed to serve their own needs. In residential zones, off-street parking is
required for each dwelling unit to allow reduction in nonarterial street width standards. This parking
ordinance encourages reduction in the impacts of increasing impervious surfaces on the costs for
each development and on the environment from stormwater drainage. Reducing pollution from
runoff and emissions serve community interests and should be balanced against requirements for
more street and parking lot improvements. The Ci_ty expects new developments to find less costly
ways to meet transportation needs and does not want to require unneeded impervious surfaces.
14.40.,~,,,020 Definitions.
A. The following terms shall have the designated meanings for the purposes of
this Chapter, unless the context indicates otherwise:
1. "Standard-car parking space" means one hundred fifty-three square feet
of parking lot area, eight feet six inches by eighteen feet minimum in size, having adequate access
to a public street. No part of any street right-of-way shall be considered part of any standard-car
parking space.
2. "Loading space" means a space located adjacent to a building, and large
enough in area so that any truck or other vehicle loading or unloading at such building will not
project into a street right-of-way.
3. "Floor area" means the leasable or habitable floor area or space in a
dwelling or building, excluding bathrooms, toilet compartments, halls, closets, or corridors 44
inches in width or less, and equipment and machinery rooms not used directly in the manufacture,
production, storage or sale of goods or services maintenance and cleaning supply rooms of 50
square feet or less.
4. "Parking lot activity" means a non-permanent activity occurring in a
parking lot, using spaces otherwise allocated for parking for purposes other than parking by
clientele of the primary use of the property.
5. "Shall" means the statement is mandatory_ and ministerial, and the action
so stated is required to be done without discretion by decision-makers.
6. "Should" means the statement ought to be done, but the action so stated
is not required to be done by decision-makers who may use discretion where exceptions are
warranted.
7. "Transportation demand management assessment" means an analysis of
public access to a specific site for land use activities permitted under the Port Angeles Municipal
Code and a City approved plan (including multi-modal s.ervices, public infrastructure improvements,
and parking) that is sufficient to mitigate, significant adverse impacts on surrounding private
properties and public transportation facilities, consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and
Urban Services Standards and Guidelines. The assessment may be done by the applicant or by an
expert transportation professional when the applicant prefers or when determined to be necessary_
by the Community Development Director.
B. All other terms used in this Chapter shall have the meaning given to them by
Ordinance 1709, as now enacted, or hereafter amended, unless the context indicates otherwise.
-3-
103
14.40.020030 Parking Space Requirements - Generally. For all land uses there shall
be established and maintained permanent off-street parking spaces, either on the zoning lot of the
use, or, if the affected property owners and the Community Development Director agree through
the execution of an appropriate agreement and easement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney
and if appropriate identification signage is provided, within two hundred feet of the property
boundaries (excluding public streets and alleys) of the zoning lot. The required number of parking
spaces shall be determined as follows:
A. The number of required spaces shall be determined either by reference to
=-~.-~,,.~,_,,, ,,.,,,u~;J, ~,.~,,_,.,~=u.the number of required parking spaces per Table A or by
using one of the alternate methods in Subsection C of this Section;
B. If applicable, Sections 14.40.110080 through 14.40.140110 shall then be used
to determine whether the number of spaces required by Subsection A of this Section is modified.
C.__:. If Subsection A of this Section is not used to determined the number of required
parking spaces, one of the following alternate methods of determining the required parking for a
particular development shall be used:
Determine the number of parking spaces required by a parking plan
approved by the Planning Commission based on the number of
employees and customers on-site during the peak hours of operation
taking into consideration duration of parking use (i.e., turnover rate) and
any reduction in single occupant vehicles due to a transportation demand
management assessment prepared per Section 14.40.030C2; or
Prepare a transportation demand management assessment that meets the
approval of the Planning Commission per Section 14.40.050; or
Obtain Planning Commission approval ora parking variance per Section
14.40.130.
D__~. If the following criteria are satisfied, then the parking requirements of Subsection
A above may be reduced accordingly.
Parking requirements may be reduced in direct ratio for each percentage
point of access provided by nonsingle occupant vehicle.
Parking requirements may be reduced by ten (10%) percent if a bus stop
or other mass transit facili _ty is located within five hundred (500) feet of the project site.
Parking requirements may be reduced in direct ratio for each percentage
point 9fparking provided by cooperative parking agreement per Section 14.40.080.
14.40.,,,-o040 Parking Space Requirements for Uses in
Approved Parking and Business Improvement Area. For atfa. ny land uses located in thc
~,,~,,,,,,~,l, a Ci_ty approved Parking and Business Improvement Area (PBIA), there shall be
established and maintained permanent off-street parking spaces, either on the zoning lot of the use
or within onc~ one thousand two hundred feet of the property boundaries (exincluding public
streets and alleys) of the zoning lot. The City_ encourages the formation of PBIAs throughout the
Ci _ty. A buffer of one thousand two hundred feet shall be required between all PBIAs to prevent
overlapping authorities and to allow PBIA parking lots outside a PBIA's boundaries similar to an
individual land use.
-4-
1 04
Child
Ilotcl~
0'~ ......
T ki
-5-
105
Ol ~11
A. Clubs, ~ ......' socictics,
B. llos als s,~,, providc onc ~,~,,~ ~ ,~, ~,, ~.
E. Outdoor sports ~ v. u~ ~,.,~, -~ ~a,~ .... u~ p..~..~ spaccs
Co:~issian rcvicw.
d 2111UI 111[11 D~IIUUI3 311~11 pi U · IM~ tim ~ pal[lll~ opd~ IUl ~a~ll ~IdDSI ~UIII.
N. Junior --" ..... ~-' .....
gUllg~g~ ~llali ~lU · lug gl~llt ~l~ll~ ~dgg~ IUI gdgll glaO~l UUIII,
O. Stadiums, sports ~,~,
14.40.050 Transpo~ation Demand Management Assessment.
A~ As paa of any land use review an~or building pe~it application with the
0f Po~ Angeles, a transpo~ation demand management assessment, which anal~es the off-street
parking needs of the new development or the expansion of use in the existing building, may be
conducted and shall require the approval of the Pla~ing Commission, if parking for the use an~or
building is not provided per Section 14.40.030A Table A or Section 14.40.030C1.
B~ Business and prope~ owners within 300 feet of the subject site shall be notified
of the ~anspo~ation demand management assessment. A public comment period of 15 days shall
be provided.
-6-
106
14.40.090060 Mixed Uses. In the case of a mixture of uses on one zoning lot or in
one building, the total requirements for off-street parking facilities shall be the sum of the
requirements for the various uses computed separately. Off-street parking facilities for one use
shall not be considered as providing required parking facilities of any other use, except as may
be provided in Section 14.40.108070 of this Chapter.
14.40. I,90070 Cooperative ProvisionsParking Agreements. Parking facilities may
be cooperatively used by different land uses, when the times of the use of such parking spaces by
each use are not nonsimultaneous. A cooperative parking agreement signed by all parties who share
the parking facilities and approved by the Community Development Director shall be required that
binds the parking facilities and the parties until the agreement is dissolved by all parties and
approved by the Community Development Director.
14.40.110080 Parking Space Requirement Modification - New Uses in New Building
Structures. For any new use in a new building or structure, the required number of parking
spaces shall be determined by the requirements of Sections 14.40.030 through 14.40.080070.
I4.40.120090 Parking Space Requirement Modification - New Uses in Existing
Structures.
-7-
107
B. . A change of use in a building or structure that exists as of ~'te-2f~d4)~April
25, 2004,,~,,,~---' ~s' ,~,~,,~L~,,~' ..... ~ ,,,-'- '~-~,,~ ~,,,~,~,~ ~,,~' ........... *'*'*~ ,o~,-~' may occur without provision of additional off-
street parking spaces unless the floor area of the building or structure is increased.
14.40.130100 Parking Space Requirement Modification - Expansion of Existing Uses
in Existing Structures. For an expansion in the use of an existing building or structure which
enlarges the floor area, additional parking spaces need not be established, if the following
requirements are met:
A. The use and structure or building, prior to its enlargement or increase in floor
area, is in conformance with the parking space requirements of this Chapter;
B. No previous modifications of parking space requirements authorized by this
Section have been utilized;
C. The number of parking spaces required by the floor area of the addition,
together with those required by the floor area of the existing building, will not exceed one
hundred and fifteen percent of the spaces required for the expansion of the use or building. If the
number of spaces required exceeds one hundred and fifteen percent, the required spaces in excess
of one hundred and fifteen percent shall be established and maintained.
14.40.140110 Parking Space Modification Requirements - Existing Uses in Existing
Structures. Existing uses occupying existing structures or buildings as of the effective date of the
ordinance codified in this Chapter may continue until there is a-ehangeq~an expansion of use.
14.40.150120 Improvement of Parking Spaces.
A. Any parking spaces provided to comply with the terms of this Chapter, other
than for single-family detached residences, shall be improved in accordance with the following
requirements:
1. They shall meet the requirements of the clearing, grading, filling and
drainage regulations set forth in Chapter 15.28 PAMC.
2. They shall be graded and paved with a hard-surface pavement of
portland cement concrete, asphaltic concrete with a structurally adequate base, or other hard-
surface pavement acceptable to the Director of Public Works and Utilities. All parking spaces
shall be clearly and permanently striped in conformance with Public Works parking lot design
standards. Wheel stops shall be installed where necessary to prevent encroachment upon public
rights-of-way. The Director of Public Works and Utilities may allow for an exception to hard-
surface pavement for developments in the Industrial Heavy Zone, provided that adverse impacts
to stormwater drainage, surrounding properties, and public infrastructure are mitigated to the
extent the Director deems reasonably necessary and appropriate.
3. They shall be accessible, at all times, from street, alley or driveway
intended to serve such off-street parking.
4. Improvements of parking spaces shall meet the Americans with
Disabilities Act standards.
-8-
B. The City may gram permission for temporary occupancy of a building or
structure even though the parking spaces required by Subsection A of this Section have not been
fully completed, provided that an improvement bond acceptable as to form and amount by the City
Engineer and the City Attorney is posted in the amount of the estimated value of the construction
of the parking facilities. Before granting such temporary occupancy, the Director of Public Works
and Utilities must determine that construction of the parking facilities prior to occupancy of the
building would not represent sound construction practice, due to weather conditions, availability
of materials and/or difficult site conditions, and the acceptance of such bond is therefore
appropriate. Improvement bonds may be accepted for a period not to exceed twelve months.
During the period before final completion of the improvements, the parking facilities provided
shall at least be graded and graveled and be maintained in a good condition.
C. Uses requiring six or fewer spaces may occupy a building or zoning lot for up
to twelve months before compliance with Subsection A2 of this Section, provided the parking
facilities shall at least be graded and graveled and be maintained in a good condition. At the end
of the twelve-month period, the parking facilities must be in compliance with Subsection A2 of
this Section, or a bond must have been provided and accepted in accordance with Subsection B
of this Section.
14.40.-t60130 Parking Space Requirements - Variances.
A. A variance from the parking space requirements of this Chapter, cit,hcr as
specifically provided by Sections 14.40.030 through 14.40.070060
granted on written request to, and after a public hearing by, the Port Angeles Planning
Commission. The Planning Commission may impose such conditions upon the variance as it
deems necessary to comply with the purpose of this Chapter and to mitigate the effects of increased
impervious surfaces. No variance shall be granted by the Planning Commission unless the
Commission finds.
1. The variance is not detrimental to surrounding properties;
2. The parking provided is sufficient to meet the parking needed by the
uses(s);
3. The variance will not create increased congestion or traffic hazards
along adjacent streets and alleys; and
4. The variance is consistent with the intent of
Ordirram'ethis Chapte. r, the zoneing district in which the site is located, and the Comprehensive
Plan.
B. Such public hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures for
a public hearing on the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Port Angeles.
C. The determination of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City
Council.
14.40.170140 Building Permits. Before the granting of a building or occupancy
permit for any new building or structure, or for any enlargement or change of use in any existing
building or structure, where the proposed use is subject to the requirements of this Chapter, the
applicant for such building permit shall comply with the requirements of this Chapter.
-9-
109
Compliance shall consist of either of the following:
A. Proof of the existence of, or the acceptance by the City of a bond for the off-
street parking spaces required by this Chapter, including a site plan showing such off-street
parking, which has been submitted to and approved by the Pla~-~ingCommunity Development
Director and City Engineer;_. such The site plan ~shall be prepared at a reasonable scale, showing
property lines, dimensions of the property, size and arrangement of all parking spaces, the means
of ingress and egress to such parking spaces and interior circulation within the parking area, the
extend of any change required in existing site conditions to provide required parking, and such
other information as may be necessary to permit review and approval of the proposed parking;
or
B. Proof that the applicant is a participant in a
approved Parking and Business Improvement Area (PBIA), which provides the
off-street parking spaces which would otherwise be required from each of the individual
participating uses.
Applicants meeting all or a portion of their required needs through the
provisions -~ -'~' .... :-- B of this Section must pay to '~--
,,~ o..o~,,,,,~,~ ,,,,an oOff-Street Parking Improvement
Fund an initial assessment amount of $6007,500 for each required parking space provided through
membership in '~- ~'~-'-:-~ * ....
,,,~~ ,~.,,,~ ,-,oo,,~,,~.~, ~ra City_ approved PBIA.
14.40.1,?,0150 Use of Parking Spaces. Subsequent to the issuance of a building
permit, the number and location of parking spaces used to satisfy the requirements of this Chapter
shall not be changed, nor shall the use of the building or structure for which the permit is issued
be changed, without '~-~: ......... ~ .... :~ '-":'~: ...... :' :-~"-":-~ pl'
,~,~ ,~o,,,~,,.~ ,,~ a ~,.,,o,.u ou,,u,~,~ p,...,,, .~,-u.,~ com ~ance with the
requirements of this Chapter. Parking spaces used by a land use to satisfy the requirements of the
Chapter shall only be used for the parking of vehicles of customers and other users of the building
by ~- ~ any pcrmancnt
and the land use authorized the building permit,
pmpc, a~. a~,a,, ~.~lU,,~. & ~.*,o~.u c,m~um~; pcrmit, except for parking provided under Sections
14.40.040 and 14.40.070.
14.40.185160 Parking Lot Activity Standards. All parking lot activities shall comply
with the following standards:
A. No such activity shall occur in parking spaces directly in front of entrances or
windows of a building.
B. Such activities shall not occupy more than 10% of the total number of spaces
in the parking lot.
C. Such activities shall not block entrances and exits to the parking lot or fire exit
doors of any buildings.
D. Such activities shall not occur in parking lots containing fewer than 20 spaces.
E. All such activities shall comply with all other applicable City Ordinances and
State Statutes.
F. Each activity shall only be for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days for
private businesses and sixty (60) days for private non-profit and charitable organizations within
a one calendar year period.
G. The location and activity shall not endanger the public health, morals, safety
- I0-
110
and welfare.
14.40.-I-90170 Revocation of Permit - Appeals.
A. An occupancy building, permit issued pursuant to the terms of this Chapter shall
be revocable by the City Manager, or his designee, for violation of any of the provisions of this
Chapter. Notice of the revocation of such permit shall be given in writing, by ordinary mail,
directed to the address of the permit holder as shown on the permit application.
B. Upon revocation, the permit holder shall have a right of appeal to the City
Council. The holder shall, within ten days of the notice of revocation, give notice to the City
Clerk, in writing, the permit holder's intention to appeal the revocation to the City Council. The
Clerk shall place the permit holder's appeal on the agenda of the next regularly scheduled City
Council meeting, and forthwith inform the permit holder, in writing, the date, time and location
of the meeting.
C. The City Council shall hold a public meeting, at which the permit holder may
present testimony as to his compliance with the terms of this Chapter.
D. The City Council shall make written findings of fact, as to the basis of any
decision which it makes. The City Council may sustain the revocation of the permit, reinstate the
permit with conditions, reinstate the permit after a time certain, or immediately reinstate the
permit.
14.40.180 Decisions of City_ Staff or the Planning Commission - Appeals.
A__:. Any person aggrieved by the decision ofCi _ty staff or the Planning Commission
may appeal the decision to the Ci_ty Council.
B._:. Appeals shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development in
writing within fourteen (14) days following the date of the decision.
C._.~. The Ci_ty Council shall conduct an open record hearing on the appeal of the City
staff's decision or a closed record hearing on the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision in
accordance with PAMC 18.02.120. The Council's decision shall be final unless appealed to Clallam
Coun _ty Superior Court in accordance with PAMC 18.02.130.
14.40.200190 Violation. Any person, firm, or corporation, in charge of premises
which violate any of the provisions of this Chapter, shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense
for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of
this Chapter is committed, continued, or permitted. Each such offense shall be punishable by a
maximum civil fine of $500.
Section 2. Severabili _ty. If any provision of this Ordinance, or its application to any
person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, or application of the
provisions of the Ordinance to other persons or circumstances, is not affected.
-11-
111
Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days following the
date of its publication by summary.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 20th day of April, 2004.
MAYOR
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk Dennis C. Dickson, Acting City Attorney
PUBLISHED: April 25, 2004
By Summary
G:~LegaI_Backup\ORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONSX2004-06.ord,wlM(A!otil 14, 2004)
-12-
112
PARKING REQUIREMENT TABLE "A"
LAND USE I PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENT
COMMERCIAL USES:
Automobile Services
Automobile service and repair shops Three (3) parking spaces plus one (1) for each mechanical bay
Automobile sales dealerships Two(2) per employee
Gas stations with convenience stores One (I) parking space for each employee with a minimum of six (6) parking spaces. Drive aisles
must accommodate two (2) cars per pump.
Food Service Activities
One (1) parking space for each three hundred (300) square feet of floor area with a
Food/grocery stores
Restaurants, taverns, and any. other One (1) parking space for each one hundred twenty-five (125) square feet of floor area of the
establishments for the sale and consumption on building ..... a .................... ~ , w ~ .....sov
ux~ v ......... of food, alcoholic beverages, or
refreshments on-site
Office/Retail Activities
Banks, professional and business offices One (1) parking space for each four hundred (400) square feet of floor area
Bowling alleys Six (6) parking spaces for each alley
Furniture/appliance stores and laundries Oue (1) parking space for each six hundred (600) square feet of floor area
D ........... N~ght clubs and lounges One (1) parking space for each fifth (50) square feet of floor area ..............
Retail stores One (1) parking space for each three hundred (300) square feet of floor area-,v~fl~ a
Skating rinks and other commercial One (1) parking space for each two hundred (200) square feet of floor area
recreational places
Theaters One (1) parking space for each three (3) seats
Music, dance, art, and other academies Eight (8) parking spaces for each classroom
Food and beverage establishments that do not One (1) parking space for each employee and three (3) per drive-up window
have on-site seating
Person al Services
Barber, beauty shops, tanning salons, physical Two (2) parking spaces per station (office area at one for each four hundred (400) square feet)
therapy, and similar services
Day care centers Two (2) parking spaces plus one (1) unloading space for those centers serving twelve (12) or
fewer children; One (1) parking space per employee plus two (2) parking spaces for unloading
for centers of more than twelve (12) children
Laundromats One (1) parking space per washing machine
Medical Services
Medical and dental offices Six (6) parking space per doctor
Hospitals O,,~ ~ ,~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ...... As determined by the Planning Commission
Research, dental, x-ray laboratories One (1) parking space for each two hundred (200) square feet of floor area
INDUSTRIAL USES
Manufacturing uses I One (1) parkin~g sp~e for~each three (3) employees with a minimum often (10) spaces
Trucking and transportation terminals Minimum often (10) spaces
Wholesale stores, warehouses, storage One (1) parking space for each two (2) employees with a minimum of ten (10) parking spaces
buildings
PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL USES
Libraries *One (1) parking space for each ;wo four hundred ~ feet of floor area
Museums One (1) parking space for each three hundred (300) feet of floor area
Schools:
......................................... d by th g C
........ Colleges and technical schools L,~,,, ~o~ p ......~ op ....................... As determine e Plannin ommission
Elementary schools One (l) parking spaces for each classroom
Middle Schools Three (3) parking space for each classroom
Preschools ~,'~i~iJi~Lii~] 6fTen (10)parking spaces for each classroom
Senior High Schools Six (6) parking spaces for each classroom
Social clubs, lodges, fraternal organizations One (1) parking space for each fifty (50) square feet of floor area of the building
w/o fixed seating
Areas of assembly without fixed seating shall As determined by the Planning Commission
provide seating
Churches, stadiums, sports areas, and other One (1) parking space for each three (3) fixed seats
such places of assembly with fixed seating
Senior centers One (1) parking space for ever~ one hundred thirty-five (135) square feet of floor area
PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC RECREATION USES
Parks and playgrounds As determined by the Planning Commission
Public and private golf club~ courses A,,l~.~,~. .............. ,.,~ 40 l,-~,--~ ......... ~paccs As determined by the Planning Commission
Swimming pools Ten (10) parking spaces for each 1,000 square feet of pool surface area
RESIDENTIAL USES
Residential dwelling units, and apartments Two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit
Residential units in an RS-12 Zone fronting on Four (4) parking spaces per dwelling unit
streets improved to low impact development
standards
Rooming and lodging uses One (1) parking space for each sleeping unit
Dormitories Two (2) parking spaces for each sleeping unit
Nursing and convalescent homes, assisted One (1) parking space for each three (3) beds
living facilities, adult family homes, group
homes, sanitariums
Trailer parks Two(2) automobile parking spaces for each trailer space
Unspecified Uses
Ifa use is not otherwise specifically mentioned in this section, the requirements for off-street parking facilities shall be the same as the requirements
for the most similar use listed herein as determined by the Director of the Department of Community Development.
Mixed Uses
In the case of a mixture of uses on one lot or in one building, the total requirements for off-street parking facilities shall be the sum of the
requirements for the various uses computed separately.
Cooperative attd Shared Parking Provisions
Parking facilities may be cooperatively used by different land uses when the times oftbe uses are not simultaneous. Parking facilities may be shared
when the times are not simultaneous through a parking agreement with the property owners and when the parking is located no further than 500 feet
from the property requiring the parking.
G:~EXCHANGEXPLANNIN G\TableAamended.wpd
4/20/04
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
March 24, 2004
6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Bob Philpott, Fred Norton, Fred Hewins, Chuck Schramm,
Dylan Honnold
Members Excused: Leonard Rasmussen, Linda Nutter
Staff Present: Brad Collins, Scott Johns, Sue Roberds
Public Present: Steve Oliver
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Philpott moved to approve the minutes of the March 10, 2004, meeting
with clarification to Condition #1 and Finding #20. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Schramm and passed 5 - 0.
PUBLIC HEARING:
Chair Hewins indicated that those who testify must sign the attendance roster and affirm that
their testimony will be truthful to the best of their knowledge.
STREET VACATION PETITION - STV 03-05 - DeFRANG, Portion of Woolcott Street
located between East Fourth Street and the 4/5 Alley:
As the applicant was not in attendance, Chair Hewins postponed the matter to latter in the meeting,
to give staff an opportunity to try to reach the applicant.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Update
Associate Planner Scott Johns described the Comprehensive Plan update process to the
present time and indicated that an early draft of proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments had been
included in the Planning Commission's packet for their review and discussion. An item by item
discussion of the proposed amendments followed. A question about how the proposed boundary for
expansion of the southwestern UGA was derived and a suggestion to extend it west to Laird Road
were made.
The proposed map change in the west end from MDR to LDR was questioned and the
explanation that no medium density development has been proposed in the area and that there was
a higher demand for single family residential than medium density residential was the reasoning
behind the amendment. Additionally, the proposed creation of the RS-12 zone would be included
Planning Commission Minutes
March 24, 2004
Page 2
in LDR areas and that would help to create a supply of large lot development potential within the
City to off-set the pressure in the County for large lot developable sites. The RS-12 zone is to be
created to have a transitional zone located within the City and UGA. Low Density Residential
designation would include RS-7, RS-9, and RS-12 zones.
Discussion of the Comprehensive Plan Map change for the Rayonier site followed. The
consensus on the Planning Commission was to leave the site designated as industrial to nurture a
more cooperative relationship with the property owner. By not changing the designation the City
would not be limiting future uses, while leaving open the possibility of changing the designation in
the future.
Questions were asked about what constituted Best Available Science and what that would
mean to the City in the future. The definition and resource list was made available to the Planning
Commission members and the role of the existing items (the Sheldon Wetland Inventory, the Pentec
Shoreline Assessment, and the DNR Shoreline Atlas as Best Available Science) were explained.
Parking Ordinance discussion
Director Collins explained that, at the request of the City Council's Community and
Economic Development (CED) Committee, staffhas been working with Commission representatives
Schramm and Rasmussen in review of an alternative proposal for amendment to provide flexibility
to the City's parking regulations. Following the Planning Commission's May, 2002,
recommendation to the Council, the CED revised some language and realizes that the proposed
revisions are not in concert with the Planning Commission's recommendation. Staffwas directed
by the CED to try to work with the Planning Commission in an attempt to reach agreement on the
issues that the two groups are most divided upon for presentation to the entire Council at its
scheduled April 20, 2004, public hearing.
Mr. Collins noted that the ability to achieve administrative approval for certain alternative
methods in determining required parking was removed from the proposed wording and that ability
was returned to the Planning Commission for review and action thus eliminating a major concern
expressed by the Planning Commission regarding the need for public review of parking reductions.
The three options that remain to someone who wishes a parking method are: 1) comply with Table
"A" which identifies a set standard parking; 2) propose a transportation demand management (TDM)
study to be approved by the Planning Commission; or 3) apply for a parking variance based on
specific reasons. (The main method for determining required parking is based on an analysis of the
number of employees and customers during the peak hours of operation.)
Commissioner Hewins noted that a main concern to him is that logical parking requirements
are in place that can readily be monitored without undue stress to a business owner or extra work for
staff in monitoring a situation that is created by a business owner and inherited by subsequent
property owners who didn't realize there were restrictions or that a reduction in parking had been
approved based on certain circumstances.
The difference between a TDM and a standard parking variance was discussed as well as
methods of evaluation of calculations for required parking. It was generally decided that there is a
need for minimum standards to ensure that a certain amount of parking is provided for business uses
to be established and to grow.
The Commission agreed that it is very important to provide notification not only to
neighboring business operators and property owners when a parking reduction is being considered,
120
Planning Commission Minutes
March 24, 2004
Page 3
but also to those property owners where off-site parking is proposed. The issue of how parking
credits would be monitored. Would it be necessary to have staff ask for a parking report to ensure
that those businesses that receive a parking reduction based on a TDM where bus ridership for
employees was expected monitor that usage? It was determined that this would not be productive
and how would a failure to meet a TDM be enforced: it was decided that a business would probably
not be told to shut down in the event that parking could not be supplied if a TDM failed.
The Commission was in agreement that off-site parking up to 1200' is too far away to be
plausible. Director Collins offered that this suggestion by the CED was used because it generally
represents two full City blocks including street rights-of-way and uses the logic of the City's
Downtown area where most parking lots are located at least 1200' fi.om businesses. He agreed that
outside of the Downtown, a more restrictive distance would work.
Commissioner Hewins noted his longstanding issue that it is important to plan for the future
and hope that businesses need to expand and flourish and that without adequate, convenient parking,
that surely will not happen. He agreed that within the Downtown PBIA 1200' distance for off-site
parking is probably fine, but, outside the PBIA, a shorter distance such as 200' is more likely to be
accessible. He still strongly urged that the standard table for minimum parking be used as the
backbone and only in specific instances should alternative methods such as a parking variance be
used. Minimums have been reduced or removed from the table making it more flexible and
addressing issues noted by staff over the past couple of years as being onerous.
The Commission generally agreed that with the changes proposed by staff to their earlier
recommendation (May 2002) and that the new amended recommendation is acceptable.
Bylaw Amendment
Commissioner Philpott moved to approve the proposed bylaw changes setting a regular
hearing time as 6 p.m. and that specific issues for action at particular meetings be amended
such that all meetings are open to regular work items.
PUBLIC HEARING:
STREET VACATION PETITION - STV 03-05 - DeFRANG, Portion of Woolcott Street
located between East Fourth Street and the 4/5 Alley:
Chair Hewins opened the public hearing. Staff informed the Commission that the applicant
would not be available as they are out of town and asked that the item be continued to April 14,
2004. Commissioner Schramm moved to continue the public hearing until the April 14, 2004,
regular meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Philpott and passed 5 - 0.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None
121
Planning Comtnission Minutes
March 24, 2004
Page 4
STAFF REPORTS
None
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
Commissioner Norton continues to meet as a representative of the Port Angeles Forward
group.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
Brad Collins, Secretary Fred Hewins, Chair
PREPARED BY: S. Roberds
122
pOR N'GELE$
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: April 20, 2004
To: City Council Members
FROM: Sue Roberds, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: Department of Community Development
Planning Division March, 2004 - Monthly Report
CURRENT PLANNING APPLICATIONS: CURRENT MONTH 2004YTD 2003 YTD
Rezone 1 1 0
Municipal Code Amendment 0 0 0
Conditional Use Permit 0 3 3
Conditional Use Permit Extension 0 0 0
Conditional Use Permit Appeal 0 0 0
Annexation 0 0 0
Municipal Code Amendment 0 0 0
Subdivision 4 7 0
Binding Site Plan 1 1 0
Short Plat 0 0 0
Appeal of Short Subdivision Decision 0 0 0
Boundary Line Adjustment 2 3 2
Home Occupation Permit 0 0 1
Retail Stand Permit 0 0 0
Bed and Breakfast Permit 0 0 0
Variance 0 0 0
Minor Deviation 0 0 0
Street Vacation 0 0 0
Parking Variance 0 0 0
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 0 2 0
Shoreline Exemption 0 0 0
Wetland Permit 0 0 0
Environmentally Sens. Areas 0 0 0
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY:
Determinations of NonSignificance 2 5 2
Mitigated Determinations of NonSignificance 0 0 0
Determinations of Significance 0 0 0
SEPA Appeal 0 0 0
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIONS:
Building Permit 14 29 8
Code Enforcement 0 0 0
Clearing
and
Grading
Permit
o 0
~ ~ 51 16
!
5:':':':' ~:~:':~:'
'- ' 1'
Z 2003 [ 2004
LAST YEAR TO DATE (MG)
THIS YEAR TO DATE SEWER SYSTEM JET"rED
STORM DRAINS JETTED
SYSTEM TV INSPECTED 495
RAINFALL
~ .............. ~ ............................... :i:i:i:i; --:i:[:::: -
~ 1~'9:: :-:-;'1. :"
z ~=.~ ........ ........
2 _: ::::::~ ......... ;::::::: J:::::::
~ ~ ~';2':': 2'1'1-;': - ..... 1':'?:' 1';';'1', ~ '1':':':.
125
ELECTRICAL USAGE
-........ ---...... '-~...... .... .~.
.--=- ~ .-'-..'- ..'...'. i ;.'...'. .'"."' :.::.: .::-:: .:2-:2 .'.".' ."." ..'..-'- ..'...'. .:2.:2 '
o -/'"'.' ~ ,:~'-'" · .-;:J~': - '"'"'~ ~ :/'.t . ,' '.' ' _ .' '-'A ~. . ?."'.'. _ -"'.'~ '-~: ..... ~ -' ...... ' ~'-- -
~2003 B 2004
LAST YEAR TO DATE . 57.7604
THIS YEAR TO DATE (M 61.5165
TEMPERATURE
~;:) ~ ''-- ,..-... ,.......~_--::.:: _:.::.:~:.::.:~-~.....-----:.::.: ...... -_~_~
40 ...... ...... ~ :.: -.:L__ :.~ ~.~.-__--,...- .~ ..... :.~ :.~.- ~'... '~.'r- ~;-; .~--;~ -
'"" :?:::!::--'.i iii i :::- iiii iiiiii
~ ~ .:::::::::¢ -~i::::::i! :::.::-::.::---~!:i.i:i :::.::: ::.:::.:~ -~:.:.:.: ..... -.:::.:::~ .:.:.:.:.:
;-::.:::.: ~:.:-:.: .... :.:.:.: ...... .:.:.:.:--- .:.:-:.:~--. ~:.:.:.: .... ,:-:.:.:~
,o :,:.:.:.: .::-::: ....... :.:::- -.:':.:':: ::.:-:.: ...... :.:.:.: ~.:':.:-:: ---,:.:':.:~ ::.:.:.:- - .:':.:'::- --
:::':.:': ":'::~ ':':-:~ --::':':~ ..... ':':':': .... :i:i::':-_ :::::::::::::::::::::: '--:;:.:::.-':_-__.. '_-:.':':?:
_: 2003 · 2004 - 10 Yoar A¥ora§o
TOTAL LANDFILL DISPOSAL
5
TOTAL CITY TONS 43.3%
THIS YR TO DATE (TONS)
LAST YR TO DATE
4
CO. RES. HAUL 13,9% =
101-%.:j CITY OF SEQUIM
3
CO. COM. HAUL7.6%
2 D.M./OLYMPIC DISPOSAL
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
QUARTERLY REPORT
* Moved 1 and installed 17 new 1" x 5/8" water services and one new 1 x 1" service Proposals for Transfer Station development and Solid Waste Mgmt Services
Repaired 8 water service leaks, and two fire hydrant Conducting Solid Waste Rate Study
Repaired fourteen 2," one 6," and two 8" water main breaks * Working on intedocal agreement with Clallam County and City of Sequim
Changed out one 1" and twenty l"x 5/8" inoperable water meters Staffed Home Show and Kiwanis Kids Fest
Dropped in two 1 x 5/8" water meters into existing water services Attended SWAC meetings; Facilitated headng tests
Replaced one 1" air vent and did two hot taps Working on modifications to Landfill recycling area
Located water valves, services, and fire hydrants for leak detection activity Attended BloCycle Northwest Symposium
Completed annual flushing of hydrants Curbside collected 281.2 tons of recycle materials and 146.8 tons of yard waste
WAS~ WATE~:COLLE~i~:'~.~I 'i~i!~ , i!!!: : ~::~'i~'' S~i~/~, ~:: ~:~', ~
Repaired Milltronics equipment that controls pump speed at pump station ~4 Repaired asphalt at 14 Water Utility Cuts, patched potholes citywide
* Speer Tap, Inc. installed Inserta-Valve at pump station #3 Replace 33'x33'x2' asphalt area at City Hall loading dock
* Cleaned sewer pump line from pump station #3 to East Boathaven Clean up hydraulic spill from collection truck; Repair sinkhole on Front St.
Did pump draw test at pump station #3; removed several pieces of stainless steel * install 350' overflow ditch; Remove trees and brush from dght of way
Worked on Tide Gates at CSO sites;Tested all pump station emergency alarms Emergency closure and clean up of Ediz Hook Road due to storm activity
Performed dye testing and utility locates as requested Assist Engineering with combined sewer outfall at Railroad and Laurel
* Installed prototype biotreatment pump at PS ~1 to assist with odor control Added 12' radius panel to guardrail at Old Mill Rd. and Ahlvers Rd.
* Unplugged pump #2 and changed packing in pump #1 at PS #4 * Installed access gates for Light Operations on M St. at 10th and 12th
Cleaned concrete out of manhole at 15th and K Street Citywide-mowed, graded, graveled, ground, educted, and swept
Assisted Solid Waste with collections and removal of newspaper collection box
:~ ;~..¢~.:~.~.:~ ~ . ~::~ ~.~ ~..~ ...... .... Installed new catch basin lips at Oakcrest Ave. and at 5th and Oaks St.
NPDES monthly reports showed no violations Remodeled Vern Burton (turn bathrooms into storage rooms)
Worked with local dischargers on pretreatment issues Repaired and re-routed roof drain line on downtown breezeway
Performed process control on secondary treatment system * Installed 331 signs; Assisted with emergency traffic control
Completed weekly O & M on Landfill leachate collection and treatment system General sign, building, and key maintenance - citywide
Replaced floor sections and set up shelving in shipping container storage units Safety meeting, hearing tests, pesticide training, "Restoration of Utility Cuts"
* Completed monthly EPA and DOE testing and monitoring Built traffic control plans and support for 8th St: bddge closure
* Automated three digester feed and waste gas actuators;Replaced boiler air pump Rebuild softJsunken areas with Control Density Fill at Front and Georgiana St.
* Repaired sodium hypochlodde leaks in disinfection building * Build forms for 11'x7' sidewalk and 16' of radius curb at Millcreek Court
Repaired sodium bisulfite level device in the dechlodnatlon building * Set up emergency traffic control for accident and disabled truck
Submitted 2003 Blosolids annual report to EPA and Ecology Build cabinets for Fine Arts Center; Remodel Equipment Services (new office)
* Attended PNCWA Olympic section meeting and toured new WWTP improvements Dig test holes for soil samples in preparation for Peabody St. rebuild
Work Orders: 349 Service Requests from Denvers Tire: 51
Service Orders: 49 Full maintenance services by Denvers: 24 8th St Bridge Replcemnt design support
* Circuit Switcher contract support
30078 92 Chevy - Replaced windshield, rear glass Elwha Dam removal mitigation support
¢/0155 99 Freightliner - Electrical short, heater cora, radiator 2004 Waterline Replacement awarded
#1520 85 Sweeper - Hydraulic repairs, electrical relay repairs Gateway Project design support
#1562 99 Johnston -Elevator bearings, belts, main broom, steering, tire service * Spruce Street Pump Station design support
#1570 95 Case 580 - Starter, batteries, key switch * Pump Station 1 & 3 design support
* #1580 94 Johnston - Steering rods & cylinders, master cylinder & all brakes, cable Electrical Underground Rebuild Elwha Line construction support
#1832 94 Ford - Replace air bag clock spring assembly and module Park Avenue Sewer design support
#1905 90 Peterbuilt - Batteries, boom cyl, belts, turbo, hydraulics, electrical short Peabody Street design
#1907 92 Peterbuilt - Rear brakes & drums, hydraulic lift cyl, grease manifold Camegie Library construction support
#1911 94 Peterbuilt - Rebuild cylinder, heater motor * Fire Hall Roof Repair design construction support
#1915 90 Compactor - Replace belly pan, N/C repairs to engine cooler leak Downtown Signals construction support
* #1920 99 Peterbuilt - Trans pm, all batteries and cables, replace cylinder City Pier design support
* #1921 01 Peterbuilt - Replace steel hydraulic lines and misc hydraulic hoses * Oaks Street sewer repair design
#8994 Streets - Misc. parts and labor during snow shift Landfill Closure/Transfer Station support
2004 CFP support
81 meters were tested and replaced
64 street lights were repaired; 109 locates were completed
61 electrical inspections were performed
* Cleaned up after wind storm - 2 major and 8 minor outage calls
Laurel and Washington substation projects working
Set and transferred 27 poles
127
128