HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 05/21/2013PORTANGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S,A
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
321 East 5th Street
MAY 21, 2013
REGULAR MEETING — 6:00 p.m.
The Mayor may determine the order of business for a particular City Council meeting The agenda should be arranged to best serve
the needs and/or convenience of the Council and the public Mayor to determine time of break The Items of business for regular
Council meetings may include the following
A. CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING AT 6:00 P.M.
B. ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CEREMONIAL MATTERS, PROCLAMATIONS & EMPLOYEE RECOGNITIONS
1. Proclamation — Clallam Transit Employees Appreciation Week B -1
C. PUBLIC COMMENT -
D. LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON THIS OR FUTURE AGENDAS -
E. CONSENT AGENDA / Approve
1. City Council Minutes for: April 9, and May 7, and 14, 2013 E -1
2. Expenditure Approval List: 4/27/13 to 5/10/13 for $2,953,571.12 E -8
3. Resolution Setting Public Hearing for 2013 — 2019 Transportation Improvement Plan & Capital Facilities Program E -32
4. Puget Sound Pilots — Ediz Hook Lease Renewal E -34
5. OPSCAN Services / Clallam County Sheriff's Office — Interlocal Agreement E -38
6. Agreement for Prisoner Confinement Services — City of Forks E -44
7. Copier Lease Renewal — Police Department E -51
F. QUASI- JUDICIAL MATTERS — REQUIRING PUBLIC HEARINGS
(6:30 P.M. or soon thereafter) None
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS — OTHER (6:30 P.M. or soon thereafter) None
H. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Municipal Code Amendments — MCA 13 -01 / Land Use Regulations Minor Amendments
Titles 8, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 / Conduct 2"d Reading, Adopt H -1
I. RESOLUTIONS NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC HEARINGS None
May 21, 2013
Mayor to determine time of break / Hearing devices available for those needing assistance.
Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - 1
J. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
1. NOAA -Feiro Pre - design Study / View Presentation, Authorize Staff J -1
2. Wireless Mobile Data System, Project CL05 -201 1 / Final Acceptance J -28
3. Harbor Cleanup Process / Approve J -33
K. FINANCE
1. Upgrade and Expansion of Wastewater Utility Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System
Project WW02 -2010 Phase I / Approve K -1
L. COUNCIL REPORTS -
M. INFORMATION
City Manager Reports:
1. Planning Commission / Minutes M -1
N. EXECUTIVE SESSION -
O. ADJOURNMENT -
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings are set by the City Council in order to meet legal requirements In addition, the City Council may set a public
hearing in order to receive public input prior to making decisions, which impact the citizens Certain matters may be
controversial, and the City Council may choose to seek public opinion through the public hearing process
May 21, 2013
Mayor to determine time of break / Hearing devices available for those needing assistance.
Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - 2
PROCLAMATION
In Recognition of
TRANSIT EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION DAY
May 30, 2013
WHEREAS, Clallam Transit employees contribute to the safety and well -being of the
passengers of the Clallam Transit System; and
WHEREAS, Clallam Transit employees provide commendable service to over one
million passengers and travel more than two million vehicle miles annually;
and
WHEREAS, Clallam Transit employees demonstrate daily their high degree of
professionalism while working in sometimes very stressful conditions; and
WHEREAS, the professionalism and dedication of these public servants results in reliable
and courteous fixed -route and paratransit bus service options for the
community.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Cherie Kidd, Mayor, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF PORT ANGELES, do hereby declare May 30, 2013, as "Transit
Employee Appreciation Day" and urge all citizens to join in acknowledging the
outstanding services of Clallam Transit employees to all the citizens in our community.
Cherie Kidd, Mayor
May 21, 2013
PUBLIC INTEREST SIGN -UP SHEET
Print' Name Clearly
Address
Agenda Topic
Plan to Speak
I ` t 1 t \*V 4
"137 Lo e72-
b...,c01,.. �V ��oe
(9/ N
f (l
■
AI £ ii_2.
■ �■ .J� J.
rt
III
J •
Q►r r L i l� I
4127 S how- •i c
e L�!
Mara-4110 n- Tha yauT���'
IN N
�`
7 it req.. Ra k.,d
66I ld. 1.3tix
s%
/
l OOc2_ TO 74 r1'� -Pl`1CI
ON
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
G: \Group \Clerk \Forms \Council Attendance Roster.doc
Good Evening,
My name is Andrea Radich and I live at 501 W 13th Street in Port Angeles. I'm the
coordinator for the Clallam County Affiliate of MoveToAmend and a co- organizer for
Clallam County MoveOn.
I'm here to speak on behalf of our local members to share our concerns about the issues
of money as speech and corporations as people and our belief that it will take a
Constitutional amendment to rectify this. As evidence of that concern and belief, we have
this stack of signed petitions from voters showing there is strong, local constituent
support for this effort.
The local progress to date:
• Over 16 towns, cities and counties in WA State have passed resolutions calling
for an amendment to control money politics, get rid of corporate personhood, or
both.
• Current efforts for resolutions are underway in many more Washington cities and
counties.
Nationwide to date:
• 13 States have passed legislation or initiatives which call for an amendment, all in
a little over 2 years! In every single state it passed, often by large majorities.
Legislation in 18 other states has been introduced in at least one state house.
• Over 400 cities and towns have passed resolutions in support of an amendment.
• The U.S. Conference of Mayors passed a resolution in support of an amendment.
• The U.S. Congress has proposed amendment bills in 2010, 2011 and 2012
addressing this issue. There are currently 14 bills in the U.S. House or Senate
which have been introduced in 2013.
When you formally pass resolutions supported by local voters, you accomplish two
things:
First, as elected city council members, there's an official record of it, making it more
likely to be heard and heeded.
Second, you demonstrate to your constituents that you take their concerns seriously.
We have prepared packets for you with information that will answer some of the
questions you may have. We will be contacting you individually very soon to discuss
further and answer any other questions. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Clallam County Move To Amend
Andrea Radich, coordinator
H: 360.457.6884 C: 360.461.5789
andreasangels @msn.com
ENO CORPORATE RULE. LEGALIZE DEMOCRACY.
MOVE TO AMEND
Clallam County, Washington
We, the People of the United States
of America, reject the U.S. Supreme
Court's Citizens United ruling and
other related cases, and move to
amend our Constitution to firmly
establish that money is not speech,
and that human beings, not
corporations, are persons entitled to
constitutional rights.
Ciallam County Move To Amend
Andrea Radich, Coordinator
H: 360.457.6884 C: 360.461.5789
andreasangels @msn.com
Index
• Why Local Resolutions Matter
• What is "Corporate Personhood "? & What about Unions
and Non - Profits?
• ABC NEWS /Washington Post Poll
• The Conservative Case for Overturning Citizens United
• Small business poll results
• Hart Research Associates poll results
• Mother Jones Campaign Flow Chart
• May 10th Nationwide Action press from Sequim gazette
• Introduction talk
Why Local Resolutions Matter
In many localities, groups of concerned citizens have approached members
of their city or county council asking them to adopt a resolution denouncing
corporate personhood and overturning the infamous Citizens United decision
by the US Supreme Court that equates money with speech and allows
unlimited spending on electioneering by corporate entities and non - profits
that are not even required to disclose their participation to voters.
Councils that pass such a resolution will be joining a growing list of
municipalities across the nation http:// united4thepeople.org/local.html who have
taken a similar stand against uncontrolled spending by transnational
corporations and the Super PACs they have created to influence our
elections.
A common concern expressed by local officials when asked to vote on such
a resolution is "How does this affect our city ?" Advocates urge their officials
to bear in mind that the idea of corporations having the same rights as
persons under the Constitution has been used in the courts repeatedly and
systematically to undermine and strike down laws that were enacted in cities,
counties and states to protect local small businesses, to ensure the health and
well being of their citizens, or to maintain the sustainability of the local
environment.
In addition city councils and mayors across the nation are concerned about
the new unlimited and anonymous independent spending coming to local
elections. In the April 2012 elections for Oklahoma City Council the Super -
PAC "Committee for Oklahoma City Momentum" spent $400,000 on four
candidates. The annual salary for an Oklahoma City Council member is
$12,000. Three of these four candidates won their campaigns. Imagine
having to prepare and raise money to counter that kind of spending on
campaigns from anonymous sources in Port Angeles races.
The U.S. Conference of Mayors has passed a resolution supporting a
resolution to amend the constitution.
By passing these resolutions, municipalities will affirm this basic American
truth: Our government should be of, by, and for the people; not of, by, and
for the wealthy few and the corporations.
What is "Corporate Personhood "?
There are two conceptions of "corporate personhood ". The first simply
bestows upon corporations the ability to engage in many legal actions (e.g.
enter into contracts, sue, be sued, etc). This is widely accepted and we do
not object to this.
However, "corporate personhood" also commonly refers to the Supreme
Court- created precedent of corporations enjoying constitutional rights that
were intended solely for human beings. We believe this form of "corporate
personhood" corrupts our Constitution and must be corrected by amending
the Constitution. Neither the Declaration of Independence nor the
Constitution ever mention corporations. But thanks to decades of rulings by
Justices who molded the law to favor elite interests, corporations today are
granted so- called "rights" that empower them to deny citizens the right to
full self - governance. For example, the Supreme Court has:
• prohibited routine inspections of corporate property without a warrant
or prior permission, even though scheduling such visits may permit a
company to hide threats to public health and safety. (Marshall v
Barlow's, 1978);
• struck down state laws requiring companies to disclose product origins
(International Dairy v. Amnestoy, [pdf] 1996), thus creating "negative
free speech rights" for corporations and preventing us from knowing
what's in our food;
• prohibited citizens wanting to defend their local businesses and
community from corporate chains encroachment from enacting
progressive taxes on chain stores. (Liggett v. Lee, 1933);
• and struck down state laws restricting corporate spending on ballot
initiatives and referenda, enabling corporations to block citizen action
through what, theoretically, is the purest form of democracy. (First
National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti).
The notorious 1886 case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad is
just one in a long series of Supreme Court cases that entrenched "corporate
personhood" in law. Justices since have struck down hundreds of local, state
and federal laws enacted to protect people from corporate harm based on
this illegitimate premise. Armed with these "rights," corporations wield ever -
increasing control over jobs, natural assets, politicians, even judges and the
law.
We believe corporations are not persons and possess only the privileges
citizens and their elected representatives willfully grant them. Our
Amendment will reverse the Court's invention of "corporate personhood" and
limit corporations to their proper role: doing business.
What about Unions and Non - Profits?
Our perspective is that no "artificial entities" - non human beings -
should have rights spelled out under the Constitution. This includes
unions and non - profit corporations.
Rights do not come from government, we have them because of the
very fact that we are alive - they are inalienable. Given that,
government does not actually have authority to grant rights to entities
created by law. Certain powers and privileges may be needed and
desired for certain entities over others, but not constitutional rights.
Non - profits do serve a different function than for - profit corporations,
as do unions. But these powers and privileges need to be spelled out
legislatively - through a democratic process - not granted by the legal
system under the Constitution.
# ##
ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: Super PACs
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 7 a.m. Tuesday, March 13, 2012
Seven in 10 Would Send Super PACs Packing
Super PACs are unwelcome guests at the 2012 election party: Seven in 10 Americans say these
pnvate, campaign- spending organizations should be illegal.
Echoing widespread disapproval of the U S Supreme Court ruling that authorized super PACs in
2010, a bipartisan 69 percent in this ABC Nevus/Washington Post poll would ban them now.
More than half, 52 percent, feel that way strongly.
Exercising what the high court characterized as free speech, these privately run political action
committees can raise unlimited money from individuals, corporations and unions They're
estimated to have spent $75 million to date on the 2012 election cycle, including nearly $70
million on the presidential contest — more than the candidates' campaigns themselves.
100%
90% -
80% -
70% -
60% -
50% -
40% -
30% -
20% -
10% -
0%
Should Super PACs be Legal or Illegal?
ABC News /Washington Post poll
❑Legal oillegai
25%
69%
Seventy -eight percent of independents and 70 percent of Democrats favor outlawing super
PACs; fewer Republicans but a majority, 55 percent, agree Banning these committees likewise
is supported by 60, 70 and 82 percent of conservatives, moderates and liberals, respectively.
This poll, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates, finds that even among supporters
of the Tea Party political movement — skeptics of government regulation in general — 69 percent
say super PACs should be illegal, including 59 percent of "strong" Tea Party supporters.
Support for allowing super PACs to operate legally, while not high, peaks at 36 percent among
Republicans, 34 percent among people with household mcomes more than $100,000 and 34
percent among young adults, age 18 to 29.
Views overall, as noted, are consistent with those on the 2010-Supreme Court ruling that cleared
the way for these super PACs by removing restrictions on political spending by corporations.
Eighty percent in an ABC/Post poll at the time opposed the ruling, and 72 percent said they'd
favor legislative efforts to reinstate campaign spending limits the court had lifted. The court may
potentially revisit the issue via a new dispute over a Montana campaign finance law.
After initially opposing super PACs, Barack Obama last month shifted positions, saying he
would accept their backing in order to stay competitive with campaign spending by super PACs
on behalf of his eventual Republican opponent.
METHODOLOGY — This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by telephone March
7 -10, 2012, among a random national sample of 1,003 adults, including landline and cell- phone-
only respondents. Results have a margin of sampling error of 4 points for the full sample. The
survey was produced for ABC News by Lancer Research Associates of New York, N.Y., with
sampling, data collection and tabulation by Abt -SRBI of New York, N.Y.
Analysis by Damla Ergun.
ABC News polls can be found at ABCNEWS.com at http / /abcnews.com /pollinauntt
Media contacts: David Ford, (212) 456 -7243, and Julie Townsend, (212) 456 -4934.
Full results follow.
1 -36, 38 -46 held for release or previously released.
37. Organizations known as' super PACs can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money
on behalf of candidates they support. (Supporters say this is a form of free speech)
while (opponents say this allows groups or wealthy individuals to have unfair
influence.) Do you think it should be legal or illegal for these super PACs to
operate?
- - -- Should be legal - - -- - -- Should be illegal - -- No
NET Strongly Somewhat NET Somewhat Strongly opinion
3/10/12 25 9 16 69 16 52 6
*+* END + +*
2
A
DEMOCRACY IS FOR PEOPLE
* * * * * * * * * **
A Public Citizen project
The Conservative Case for Overturning Citizens United
In 2010, when the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election
Commission struck down laws restricting corporate and union spending in elections,
Americans from all political backgrounds expressed outrage at the Court's disastrous
decision. Today, when Americans are asked if they believe big money has a corrupting and
undue influence on our political process, the answer is consistently a resounding yes.
Yet, a small band of corporate- backed commentators and advocacy groups, such as the
original Citizens United, claim the Court's ruling was a "victory for free speech" and that
overturning Citizens United is part of a "liberal" political agenda. Despite these claims, there
are compelling reasons why conservatives should be concerned about the impact of the
Court's ruling and should join fellow conservatives as well as Americans across the political
spectrum in efforts to overturn Citizens United.
CITIZENS UNITED V. FEC - REPUBLICANS EXPRESS THEIR OUTRAGE
There has been a lot of noise from a small group of corporate- backed political organizations
about how the Citizens United ruling was a "victory for free speech." Yet, in the wake of the
Court's decision, poll after poll has shown that Americans of all political stripes believe the
Court made a disastrous decision.
Most Republicans think Citizens United was bad for democracy:
• A survey conducted in April 2012 by the Opinion Research Corporation (ORC) found
that overall, 69% of Americans agreed that "new rules that let corporations, unions
and people give unlimited money to Super PACs will lead to corruption." Only 15%
disagreed.'
o Notably, three out of four Republicans (74 %) agreed with this statement."
o A similar poll conducted in January 2012 by the Pew Research Center (PRC) showed
that Independent voters were by far the group that felt the Citizens United ruling
was negative - more than two out of three (67 %) of those polled said the ruling
has a negative impact on political campaigns .w
Most Republicans think big campaign spenders, including corporations, can influence
how a member of Congress votes:
• More than two- thirds of respondents (68 %) in the ORC poll— including 71% of
Republicans — also agreed that, "if a company spent $100,000 to help elect a member
of Congress, it could successfully pressure him or her to change a vote on proposed
legislation." Only one in five respondents disagreed.'"
Most Republicans think that increased campaign spending erodes trust:
• Over two out of three Republicans (67 %) responding to the OCR poll said that "they
trust government less because big donors to Super PACs have more influence than
regular voters."'
* * * * * * * * * * *
1600 20th St. NW, Washington, D.0 20009 * (202) 588 -1000
www.democracyisforpeople.org
DEMOCRACY is FOR PEOPLE
* * * * * * * * * * *
A Public Citizen project
Most Republicans, including Tea Party supporters, think steps should be taken to curb
this corrosive campaign spending:
• A March 2012 poll conducted by ABC News /Washi gton Post, showed that over two -
thirds of Americans (69%) felt Super PACs should be illegal - and over half of these
people (52 %) said they strongly supported such a move.vz
• Among Tea Party supporters, the number was the same: 69% of Tea Party supporters
felt that super PAC's should be outlawed: »
CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM: PART OF THE CONSERVATIVE LEGACY
Campaign finance reform - including efforts to limit political spending by corporations,
unions and the super - wealthy - has historically been part of the conservative Legacy.
• The Court's decision rolled back nearly a century of laws - federal and state - passed
by lawmakers from both sides of the aisle who, regardless of political affiliation,
agreed that reasonable restrictions can and should be placed on campaign spending by
powerful special interests in order t o preserve our democracy. Bipartisan reform efforts
included the original ban on direct corporate contributions in the 1907 Tillman Act, and
both the 1971 Federal Election Campaign Act and its strong amendments passed in the
aftermath of the Watergate scandal.
• Citizens United itself struck down key parts of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of
2002 (BCRA), known as the McCain - Feingold Act. BCRA was introduced by Senator John
McCain, and was signed into law in 2003 by Republican President George W. Bush.v
Stalwart conservative statesmen have fought for campaign finance reform.
• No less a conservative movement icon than Republican Senator Barry Goldwater of
Arizona uttered these words in support of bipartisan campaign finance reform in 1983:
"[O]ur nation is facing a crisis of liberty if we do not control campaign expenditures. We
must prove that elective office is not for sale. We must convince the public that elected
officials are what James Madison intended us to be, agents of the sovereign people, not the
hired hands of rich givers, or what Madison called factions."
• Arizona Senator John McCain, Goldwater's successor and the 2008 Republican
presidential nominee, called the Supreme Court's ruling `a combination of arrogance,
naivete and stupidity, the likes of which I have never seen."
• Arguing that campaign finance and ;government waste are often connected, former
Senator Alan Simpson of Wyoming notes that, "Public employee pensions, which far
exceed their private- sector equivalents, and multibillion- dollar defense programs not
requested by the Pentagon are but two examples of the very real price we pay when
special interest groups are permitted to influence policies. Both parties are to blame."'
• Decrying Citizens United and seeking to reinvigorate the tradition of pro- reform
conservatives in Congress that he'd been a part of for decades, former Senator Warren
Rudman of New Hampshire wrote that "Supreme Court opinion notwithstanding,
corporations are not defined as people under the Constitution, and free speech can
hardly be called free when only the rich are heard. "x
* * * * * * * * * * *
1600 20th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20009 * (202) 588 -1000
www.democracyisforpeople.org
DEMOCRACY IS FOR PEOPLE
* * * * * * * * * * *
A Public Citizen project
CITIZENS UNITED V FEC- BAD FOR CORE CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL CONCERNS
Protecting States' Rights
• This new influx of Citizens United enabled corporate and union political spending stands
to have the greatest impact on the outcomes of state and local elections, where huge
spending increases can dwarf local resources. This summer's recall elections in
Wisconsin, where money from out -of -state corporations, unions, and millionaires is
pouring in at record levels, shows how Citizens United has made local matters less
determined by local voters than ever.
• In a Montana case, Western Tradition Partnership vs. Montana, an appointee of
Republican Governor and RNC Chairman Marc Racicot, Justice James fiercely criticizes
the Citizens United ruling. He states "I thoroughly disagree with the Supreme Court's
decision in Citizens United. I agree, rather, with the eloquent and, in my view, better -
reasoned dissent of Justice Stevens. "xi
Supporting Small Business
• Small business owners oppose the Citizens United ruling: A recent survey in January
2012 of small business owners indicated that 66% of the small business owners
polled felt that the Supreme Court's ruling has been bad for small business,
compared to only 9% who felt that it has been good for small business.
• Additionally, 88% of those polled view money in politics negatively, including 68%
who view it "very negatively." xu
• Why do small businesses feel this way? It's not hard to see why - most political
contributions given to SuperPACs and independent groups come from a very, very small
pool of extremely wealthy donors and giant corporations.
• Though small businesses owners are now 'free' to make these unlimited political
contributions, when it comes to political spending small business owners on Main St.
can't compete with Big Banks on Wall Street.
When local decision makers do away with partisan rhetoric and look at the facts on the
ground, it's clear that Americans across the political spectrum are concerned about the
impacts of the Citizens United on our democracy and our American way of life, and have a
big opportunity to reach out - across the aisle or across town - to work with others to undo
this ruling.
From the grassroots on up, the American people are mobilizing to take back local voters'
right to hold sway over our elected decision - makers. By passing a local resolution calling for
[a constitutional amendment to] overturn Citizens United, conservatives can play an integral
part in protecting our democracy for the next generation.
* * * * * * * * * * *
1600 20th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20009 * (202) 588-1000
www.democracyisforpeople.org
DEMOCRACY is FOR PEOPLE
* * * * * * * * * **
A Public Citizen project
Brennan Center for Justice (24 Apnl 2012). "National Survey: Super PACs, Corruption, and Democracy." Retrieved 27 Apnl
2012, from http. / /www.brennancenter ors/content/resource/national survey super pacs corruption and democracy
nl Brennan Center, /bid
Pew Research Center (17 Jan 2012) Super PACs Having Negative Impact, Say Voters Aware of 'Citizens United' Ruling,
Retrieved 18 January, 2012, from http. / /www.oeonle.press,org /2012/01/17/ super -pacs- having- negative - impact- s.y- voters-
aware -of- citizens- united - ruling/
,v Brennan Center, Ibid.
v Pew Research Center, Ibid.
' Eggen, D (17 Feb 2010,15 Sept 2011) "Poll Large malonty opposes Supreme Court's decision on campaign financing "
Washington Post. Retrieved 15 Sept, 2011, from http.//www.washingtonpost.coml/wp-
dyn /content /article /2010/02 /17 /AR2010021701151.html.
e Eggen, Ibid.
v" Roll call votes for BCRA in the U.S. House accessed via the U.S. House Clerk here.
http / /mentata.com /ds /retneve /congress /vote /VC107S22 Roll call votes for BCRA for the U S Senate accessed via U S
Senate Clerk here.
www senate gov /legislative /LIS /roll call lists /roll call vote cfm,cfm? congress = 107 &session =l &vote =00054
Simpson, A. (25 April 2011). "Special Interests Distort Elections." Politico. Retrieved 1 May 2012 from
http: / /www.politico.com/news /stories /0411 /53 597.html #ixzz l tk109YdT.
Rudman, R. (5 Feb 2010). "Republicans losing their way on campaign reform." Washington Post.
Retrieved 1 May 2012 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dvn /content /a rticle/ 2010 /02/04/AR2010020403624.html.
Western Tradition Partnership vs. Montana 2011 MT 328 (MT 2011). (Nelson, J. dissenting).
xu American Sustainable Business Council (17 Jan 2012). "Poll Results. Money and Politics" Retrieved 18 January, 2012, from
http.//www.asbcounciLorg/poll_money_m_politics.html
* * * * * * * * * * *
1600 20th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20009 * (202) 588-1000
www.democracyisforpeople.org
American
Sustainable
Business
Council
the
MAJN
alliance
••••
rrrr SMALL BUSINESS
���� MAJORITY
Small Businesses Reject Role of Money in Politics; View Citizens
United Decision as Bad for Business
On Jan. 21, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in its Citizens United decision that corporations are
free to spend unlimited sums of money in elections. According to opinion polling released by the
American Sustainable Business Council, Main Street Alliance and Small Business Majority, two- thirds
of small business owners see this decision as bad for small business. The poll also shows small
business owners overwhelmingly believe corporations have been given too much freedom to spend
money that directly influences political campaigns.
Main Findings
Small business owners view the Citizens United decision as bad for small business: 66%
of those surveyed said the two- year -old ruling that gives corporations unlimited spending power in
elections is bad for small businesses. Only 9% said it was good for small business.
Figure 1: Majority of small businesses don't support Citizens United decision
In January 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in its Citizens United decision that corporations are
free to spend unlimited sums of money in elections. Do you believe this change is mostly good for
small businesses, somewhat good for small businesses, neither good nor bad for small businesses,
somewhat bad for small businesses, or mostly bad for small businesses?
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
January 18, 2012
Small business owners have a negative view of the role money plays in politics overall:
88% of respondents view the role money plays in politics negatively; 68% view it very negatively.
Figure 2: Small businesses view money's role in politics negatively
■
Do you have a positive, negative, or neutral view of the role money plays in politics?
Positive
Negative
Neutral
Don't know
1 4%
7%
1%
88%
0% 20%
40% 60% 80% 100%
Conclusion
The latest poll results reveal that small business owners believe unlimited corporate political spending
in elections is detrimental to small business success. The poll found small business owners across the
country are in broad disagreement with the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. With two -
thirds of respondents believing this change is bad for small business and another 88% of them
negatively viewing the role money plays in politics overall, small business owners' perspectives are
clear: Unlimited corporate political spending in elections hurts the interests of small businesses,
America's jobs engine.
Methodology
This poll reflects an Internet survey of 500 small business owners across the country, commissioned
by the American Sustainable Business Council, Main Street Alliance and Small Business Majority and
conducted by Lake Research. It has a margin of error of +/- 4.4 %. The survey was conducted between
December 8, 2011 and January 4, 2012.
Researchers used a random sample of small business owners obtained from Harris Interactive, with
additional samples from InfoUSA.
2 January 18, 2012
TopDh es
1. In January 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in its Citizens United decision that corporations
are free to spend unlimited sums of money in elections. Do you believe this change is mostly good
for small businesses, somewhat good for small businesses, neither good nor bad for small
businesses, somewhat bad for small businesses, or mostly bad for small businesses?
Business Size
(by number of employee, including owner)
1 2 -9 10+
TOTAL (%)
Mostly good 5 2 5 7
Somewhat good 5 6 2 8
Neither good nor bad 19 12 22 17
Somewhat bad 10 11 11 10
Mostly bad 56 59 54 56
Don't know 6 10 5 3
Good 9 8 8 15
Bad 66 69 65 65
2. Do you have a positive, negative, or neutral view of the role money plays in politics?
Very positive 2 0 2 2
Somewhat positive 2 0 3 4
Neutral 7 6 8 7
Somewhat negative 20 27 21 11
Very negative 68 65 67 75
Don't know 1 2 0 1
Positive 4 0 5 6
Negative 88 92 87 86
bout the
(1)
B'gafa8at r.,BIS
American Sustainable Business Council
American Sustainable Business Council (ASBC) is a powerful coalition of business networks
representing over 100,000 companies and 200,000 business leaders. ASBC advocates for public
policies that meet the realities of the 21st century global economy. www.asbcouncil.org
Main Street Alliance
The Main Street Alliance is a national network of state -based small business coalitions. MSA creates
opportunities for small business owners to speak for themselves on issues that impact their businesses
and local economies. www.mainstreetalliance.org
Small Business Majority
Small Business Majority is a national nonpartisan small business advocacy organization, founded and
run by small business owners, and focused on solving the biggest problems facing America's 28 million
small businesses. We conduct extensive opinion and economic research and work with small business
owners, policy experts and elected officials nationwide to bring small business voices to the public
policy table. www smallbusinessmajority.org
3 January 18, 2012
Hart Research Associates
1724 Connecticut Avenue, N W.
Washington, D C. 20009
202- 234 -5570
202 -232 -8134 FAX
Impressions Of The Citizens United Decision And A
Proposed Constitutional Amendment To Overturn It
Findings from a national survey of registered voters
conducted by Hart Research Associates
Key findings from this survey
American democracy is an amazing and responsive form of government. For all the
Sturm and Drang that surrounds our political system, the American public instinctively
seems to know when things have gone too far or the system is out of balance. It does
not take a tragedy like Tucson to know when the dialogue needs to be recalibrated.
This survey measures American attitudes toward the January 2010 Supreme Court
ruling in the Citizens United case that said corporations have the same rights as
individuals and that limiting corporate spending on elections would be a violation of
corporations' freedom of speech. It shows that the American public instinctively feels
this ruling is a step too far and destabilizing for our democratic system. Nearly four
in five (79 %) Americans support passage of an amendment to overturn the
decision and make clear that corporations do not have the same rights as
people, thus giving Congress the authority to limit the amount of money
corporations can spend on elections.
Dissatisfaction With The Political System And The Advantage That
Corporations Have Over Average Citizens
The public has a low level of confidence in and satisfaction with all central elements of
our political system. A mere 14% of voters have a great deal or quite a bit of
confidence in the political system, and 52% have little confidence. Just 20% of voters
are satisfied with the current U.S. political system, while 57% are dissatisfied. Voters
are dissatisfied with several elements related to the nation's political system, but they
are most dissatisfied with the ability of special interests and corporations to affect the
outcome of elections, as well as with political advertising and the amount of money
spent on campaigns.
Just as there is little confidence in our political system, the public also has little
confidence in corporations today: 14% have a great deal or quite a bit of confidence in
corporations, whereas 46% have little confidence in them. Underscoring this lack of
trust is that better than four in five (82 %) Americans feel corporations care mostly
about profits, cut corners on services, overcharge on prices, and do not treat their
customers well.
Hart Research / Public Opinion Strategies
The public feels that the current system is out of balance, and there is a desire to
figure out how to reestablish a balance between business interests and the interests of
individual citizens. Currently 77°k of voters feel that corporations have the advantage
over average citizens in our political system.
This sense of imbalance is perceived not only in the way corporations impact
campaigns and elections, but also in corporations' sway over legislation, regulations,
and enforcement. Just 5% of voters think that the current rules and regulations
controlling the influence of large corporations on legislation and enforcement are
working well, while 57% think they are working extremely or very bad. Additionally,
61% worry a great deal or quite a bit that corporations have too much influence and
control over government rules and regulations.
Unfavorable Impressions Of The Citizens United Decision
Awareness of the Citizens United decision is low (just 22% of voters have heard about
it), but public reaction is overwhelmingly negative. Among those who have heard of
it, 64% disapprove, including 55% who strongly disapprove of it. When those who are
not familiar with it read a brief description of it, they have an unfavorable reaction to it
by more than five to one (13% favorable, 67% unfavorable).
More than four in five (82 %) voters think Congress should take action to limit the
amount corporations can spend on elections, and nearly as many (79 %) believe that
the Citizens United ruling is quite significant.
Support For A Constitutional Amendment To Make Clear That Corporations Do
Not Have The Same Rights As People
Fully 79% of voters support passage of a Constitutional amendment to overturn the
Supreme Court's decision in the Citizens United case and make clear that corporations
do not have the same rights as people, including 42% who would definitely support it.
Just 21% are opposed. Large majorities of Democrats (87 %), independents (82 %),
and Republicans (68 %) support passage of the amendment.
Each of the arguments in favor of passing a Constitutional amendment to overturn the
Citizens United decision is more convincing than any of the arguments against it, and
the least effective argument against passage is that it will take too long and is not a
good use of Congress's time.
In many different ways, the American public makes clear its disapproval of the ruling
in the Citizens United case and signals its broad support for a Constitutional
amendment to overturn this decision and make clear that corporations do not have
the same rights as people. There is a clear desire to readjust the level of influence
that corporations have in the nation's political, legislative, and regulatory systems.
From December 27, 2010, to January 3, 2011, Hart Research Associates conducted a survey
among 500 registered voters on behalf of Free Speech For People with support from the Nathan
Cummings Foundation. The interviews were conducted online among a nationally
representative sample of voters.
Page 2
YES
Maybe we
should have
clarified: Are
you actually a
person?
YES
YES
Give to the
candidate. You
can give up
to $2,5o0 per
election. Pretty
disappointing,
huh?
Don't
worry,
corporations are
people too! Do you
like doing your
own dirty
work?
(SIGH 1 NO
Start a PAC.
Post - Citizens
United, PACS are
the vinyl records
of influence
peddling—
outdated but still
good for special
occasions. They
can't give more
than $5,000
to a candidate
per election.
Become a bundled
Have our friends
and family write
checks to your
candidate of
choke. Think of
it as a rent party,
except in this case
you'll need to raise
tens of thousands
of dollars, and
the apartment is
the US Embassy
in the Bahamas.
Do you
have more
money to burn?
NO, BUT MY
PALS 00
C
Just how
secretive do
you want to be
about this?
Form a shell
company. It can
make donations
to super -vacs
or sot(c)s. lust
don't be too
obvious about it.
PRETTY
SECRETIVE
SUPER.
SECRETIVE
Give morel You can
donate all you want to
a candidate's recount
fund or inaugural
committee. You can
give $5,000 to her
PAC. You can even
give up to Ss,000
to her compliance
fund, which pays
lawyers to make
sure the candidate
follows fundraising
rules. Meta!
ABIT
YES
How
much more?
http: / /www. motherjones.com /politics /2011 /12 /campaign - finance -flow -chart
Give to a sot (c)
(4), (5), or (6).
It's not money
laundering if
it has its own
tas code. These
nonprofits can
act like slush
funds for their
sister super -
PACS —and
they don't have
to disclose
their donors.
NOT so
MUCH
Give to a super -
PAC. You can
spend as much
as you want,
as long as you
disclose your
identity (unless
you use a shell
company).
Super -PACs can't
collaborate with
candidates, but
it's no secret
whom they're
supporting.
Give to a party.
You can give
up to S;o,Soo a
year to various
Democratic
and Republican
campaign
committees,
which fund
candidates.
m
A TON
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 •A -5
1'NITY NEWS BRIEFS
OMG•..CORPORATI f NS A'\E PEOPLE?
MONEY IS SPE CH? Illy!
1111 r o veT' mend. 4
, ..... ....
0A
MOVING FORWARD WITH PROTESTS
,Move to Amend and MoveOn volunteers from Clallam and Jefferson counties hold freeway
banners at; River Road on May 10. Sequim was one of 50 cities that saw residents par-
ticipating in the Day of Action Against "Corporate Personhood." May 10 marked the 127th
anniversary of the Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad decision, in which the
Supreme Court first ruled that corporations are "persons" entitled to rights under the U.S
Constitution. The group's protest was to call for an amendment to the U.S. 'Constitution to
overrule the Supreme Court and declare that only human beings have Constitutional rights,
and to draw attention prior to a ballot initiative in 2014. "We have seen a steady expansion
of corporate power and wealth at the expense of the rights of people and communities,"
Andrea Radich, facilitator of Clallam County MoveToAmend, said in a statement. "We're
protesting today to say enough is enough." Sequim Gazette photo by Michael Dashiell
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
April 9, 2013
CALL TO ORDER SPECIAL MEETING:
A Special City Council meeting was called to coincide with the Utility Advisory Committee meeting. Being no
quorum present, a Special City Council meeting was not conducted.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Mayor Kidd and Councilmembers Bruch and Di Guilio.
Members Absent: Deputy Mayor Collins and Councilmembers Nelson, Mania, and Downie.
Cherie Kidd, Mayor Janessa Hurd, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
May 7, 2013
CALL TO ORDER - SPECIAL MEETING
Mayor Kidd called the special meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order at 5:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Mayor Kidd, Deputy Mayor Collins, Councilmembers Bruch, Downie, Mania [by phone], and
Nelson.
Members Absent: Councilmember Di Guilio.
Staff Present: City Manager McKeen, Attorney Bloor, Deputy Clerk Pierce, N. West, and S. Roberds.
It was moved by Collins and seconded by Downie to:
Excuse Councilmember Di Guilio from the May 7, 2013 Special City Council meeting
Motion carried 6 -0.
Council interviewed George Reimlinger and Deana Volker for the Planning Commission. Council discussion
followed.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Based on input from Attorney Bloor, Mayor Kidd announced the need for an Executive Session, under authority of
RCW 42.30.110(g) to review the performance of a public employee for approximately 25 minutes.
In attendance: Mayor Kidd, Deputy Mayor Collins, Councilmembers Bruch, Downie, Mania [by phone], and
Nelson, and Manager McKeen.
The Executive Session convened at 5:25 p.m.
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
The Executive Session concluded at 5:50 p.m. No action was taken.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Kidd adjourned the special meeting at 5:50 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING
Mayor Kidd called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Mayor Kidd, Deputy Mayor Collins, Councilmembers Bruch, Downie, Mania [by phone], and
Nelson.
Members Absent: Councilmember Di Guilio.
Staff Present: City Manager McKeen, Attorney Bloor, Clerk Hurd, Deputy Clerk Pierce, B. Olson, G Cutler, N.
West, K Dubuc, C. Delikat, B. Smith, D Bellamente, P. Lusk, A. Gates, and M. Abed.
E -2
PORT ANGELES CITY COUNCIL MEETING — MAY 7, 2013
It was moved by Collins and seconded by Downie to:
Excuse Councilmember Di Guilio from the May 7, 2013 Council meeting
Motion carried 6 -0.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Kidd invited Abby Sanford from Jefferson Elementary help lead the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
CEREMONIAL MATTERS, PROCLAMATIONS & EMPLOYEE RECOGNITIONS
1. Proclamation - Older Americans Month
Mayor Kidd presented a proclamation in recognition of Older Americans Month to D Bellamente and Senior Center
volunteers.
2. Proclamation - National Public Works Week
Mayor Kidd presented a proclamation in recognition of National Public Works Week to Public Works & Utilities
Director Cutler, and Deputy Directors P. Lusk and M. Abed.
3. Employee Recognition / Janessa Hurd — Certified Municipal Clerk (CMC)
City Manager McKeen recognized City Clerk Hurd for successfully completing municipal clerk certification.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Carrie and Abby Sanford, 224 W. 7th St., thanked Mayor Kidd for volunteering to get "dunked" at the upcoming
Jefferson School Spring Fair.
Kristin Halberg, 1507 E. Beach Rd., and Mindy Aisling, 702 Estes Ct., spoke on behalf of Thriving on the OP, and
their Love Letters project. They distributed letters to Council, staff, and the public.
CONSENT AGENDA
Council briefly discussed the Consent Agenda.
It was moved by Nelson and seconded by Downie to approve the Consent Agenda to include:
1 City Council Minutes for April 16, and April 20, 2013
2 Expenditure Approval List. 04/06/13 to 4/26/13 for $8,166,496 59
3. Material Purchase Solid Waste 95 and 300 Gallon Containers, SW -13 -001
4 Clallam County Opportunity Fund Board /Appointment
5 Material Purchase Electric Transformers, Contract LO -13 -007
6 Joint Resolution of the Cities within Clallam County Regarding Economic Development / Pass Resolution No.
08 -13.
Motion carried 6 -0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS — OTHER
1. 2013 Budget Amendment #1
Chief Financial Officer Olson stated this amendment is the first in a series of budget amendments, and described
plans to bring amendments to Council on a quarterly basis. He informed Council how State Law requires a
minimum of five affirmative votes to pass this type of ordinance amendment.
Page 2 of 5
E -3
PORT ANGELES CITY COUNCIL MEETING — MAY 7, 2013
Mayor Kidd continued the public hearing at 6:32 p.m. There being no public comments, she closed the public
hearing at 6:32 p.m., and conducted a second reading of the Ordinance by title, entitled,
ORDINANCE NO. 3477
An ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, amending the 2013 budget and
funds.
It was moved by Bruch and seconded by Mania to:
Adopt the Ordinance as read by title
Motion carried 6 -0.
2. Municipal Code Amendments — MCA 13 -01 / Land Use Regulations Minor Amendments / Titles 8, 11, 13,
14, 15, 16, and 17
Community and Economic Director West stated his department annually reviews the land use code for minor
changes to improve customer service. He identified and described some of the minor changes and stated the
Planning Commission voted unanimously for approval. Council discussion followed.
Mayor Kidd opened the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. There being no public comments, she closed the public hearing
at 6:38 p.m. and conducted a first reading of the Ordinances by title, entitled,
ORDINANCE NO.
An ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, making changes to Chapters 8.30,
11.08, 13.32, 14.36, 14.40, 16.04, 17.08 and 17.11 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code relating to Land Use
ORDINANCE NO.
An ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, making changes to Chapter 15.80 of
the Port Angeles Municipal Code relating to environment definitions.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
1. Elwha River Sediment Presentation Update
Director Cutler briefly reviewed the presentation Council received last year on the plans for the removal of the
Elwha Dams and sediment in the river. He noted tonight's presentation was intended to be an update.
Olympic National Park Superintendent Sarah Creachbaum introduced her staff in attendance, including Andy
Ritchie, Olympic National Park's foremost leading expert on sediment in the river, and project manager Brian
Winters. Director Creachbaum thanked City staff for a successful meeting last week. Council discussion followed.
Mayor Kidd recessed the meeting for a break at 7:25 p.m. Councilmember Downie left the Council Chambers. The
meeting reconvened at 7.36 p.m.
2. Teamsters Communications and Support Unit Union Contract
Human Resources Analyst Gates presented the Teamsters contract and described the changes from the previous
contract. Council discussion followed.
It was moved by Nelson and seconded by Collins to:
Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the labor contract between the City and the Teamsters Union,
Communications and Support Unit, for the contract period covering January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2014,
including retroactivity for the 2013 wage increase
Motion carried 5 -0.
Page 3 of 5
E -4
PORT ANGELES CITY COUNCIL MEETING — MAY 7, 2013
3. Planning Commission / Board of Adjustment Interviews & Appointments
Mayor Kidd asked if Council needed any more discussion regarding the interviews held during the Special City
Council meeting. Council agreed by consensus they were ready to appoint a candidate.
Clerk Hurd conducted a roll call vote and George Reimlinger was appointed to the Planning Commission by
a 5 -0 vote. Council discussion followed.
It was moved by Nelson and seconded by Bruch to:
Authorize the City Manager to invite, and if she accepts, appoint Deanna Volker to serve on the Board of
Adjustment.
Motion carried, 5 -0.
FINANCE
1. Lauridsen Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project / Construction Management Agreement
Director Cutler presented the request to amend Exeltech contract to include construction management services. He
briefly described the process for requests for qualifications and how Exeltech was selected out of ten other firms. He
listed the local contractors Exeltech will subcontract with on the project. Council discussion followed.
At the request of Mayor Kidd, Roger Burton, Senior Project Manager with Exeltech, answered questions about the
specific amounts expected to be paid to the various local contractors.
Deputy Mayor Collins asked questions about the industry standard for construction management fees based upon
total construction costs. He stated he wanted to include a cap on the construction management costs based upon
percentage on the construction costs. Council discussion continued.
Councilmember Mania stated for the record he was advocating a cap as Deputy Mayor Collins suggested, but
believes it is beneficial to keep the costs within the industry standard range of 10 -12 %.
Councilmember Downie returned to the meeting at 7:58 p.m. Council discussion followed.
It was moved by Nelson and seconded by Bruch to:
Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign Amendment No 1 to the agreement with Exeltech for the Lauridsen
Boulevard Bridge Replacement, Project TR42 -99 in the not to exceed amount of $463,522 16 and to make minor
modifications to the agreement, if necessary
Motion failed 3 -3, with Kidd, Collins, and Mania voting in opposition. Council discussion followed.
It was moved by Collins and seconded by Bruch to:
Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with Exeltech for the Lauridsen
Boulevard Bridge Replacement, Project TR42 -99 in the not to exceed amount of $463,522 16, or 12% of the
construction bid award, whichever is less, subject to agreement by Exeltech Consulting, and to make minor
modifications to the agreement, if necessary.
Motion carried 5 -1, with Mania voting in opposition.
2. Utilities Cost of Service Analysis - Consultant Agreement
Director Cutler described the need for the Utilities Cost of Service Analysis and how the City historically conducts
this analysis every few years.
Deputy Director Lusk presented the fee structure for the analysis and described the reasons for under - budgeting in
the 2013 Budget. He stated the Utility Advisory Committee recommended moving forward.
Director Cuter stated the analysis was critical to address time -of -use rates for the electric utility and landfill project
issues.
Manager McKeen also explained the discrepancy between the 2013 Budget and the final consultant fee, and stated
the fee was reasonable.
Page 4 of 5
E -5
PORT ANGELES CITY COUNCIL MEETING — MAY 7, 2013
Chief Financial Officer Olson explained the City's need to secure its financial position and how the analysis will
help the City make decisions. He emphasized the importance of the study for the upcoming debt the City will have
to incur to fix the landfill. Council discussion followed.
It was moved by Bruch and seconded by Mania to:
Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign the Utility Cost of Service Analysis Professional Services
Agreement with FCS Group in an amount not to exceed $145,876, and to make minor modifications to the
agreement, if necessary
Motion carried 5 -1, with Kidd voting in opposition.
3. Equipment Purchase: Light Operations — Replacement Bucket Truck
Director Cutler explained the need for a new bucket truck as the current truck has reached the end of its service life.
It was moved by Nelson and seconded by Downie to:
Award and authorize the City Manager to sign a contract and appropriate documents to purchase a new bucket
truck from Versalift Industries, in the amount of $132, 855, including delivery cost and sales tax, and to make minor
modifications to the contract, if necessary
Motion carried 6 -0.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Nelson spoke regarding her attendance at the Senior Games Bunco fundraiser and the Clallam
County Service Awards.
Councilmember Downie provided a brief update on the success of the cruise ship visits.
Mayor Kidd spoke regarding her attendance at the groundbreaking for Homes for Our Troops and the grand opening
for the new Shane Park playground.
Councilmember Bruch thanked Director Delikat for cleaning the pickle ball courts and spoke regarding attending
the Peninsula Behavioral Health fundraiser and the Port Angeles Farmers' Market. No other reports given.
INFORMATION
Manager McKeen spoke regarding reports in the packet and specifically addressed the emergency generators and
2013 Work Plan Update.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Kidd adjourned the meeting at 9:02 p.m.
Cherie Kidd, Mayor Janessa Hurd, City Clerk
Page 5 of 5
E -6
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
May 14, 2013
CALL TO ORDER SPECIAL MEETING:
A Special City Council meeting was called to coincide with the Utility Advisory Committee meeting. Being no
quorum present, a Special City Council meeting was not conducted.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Deputy Mayor Collins and Councilmembers Di Guilio and Downie.
Members Absent: Mayor Kidd, and Councilmembers Nelson, Mania, and Bruch.
Cherie Kidd, Mayor Janessa Hurd, City Clerk
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
CLALLAM CNTY TREASURER
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
LEADSONLINE
Jackilynn DeMars
THE ANSWER FOR YOUTH
R D J Specialties, Inc
Description
MARCH CVCA TO CL CO TREAS
Excise Tax Return -March
Excise Tax Return -March
Excise Tax Return -March
SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV
LOOMIS DEPOSIT REFUND DEM
OL REFUNDS
FIRE PREVENTION STICKERS
PORT ANGELES FINE ARTS CENTER FNC PRINTING,SILK SCR,TYPSET
WA STATE PATROL
WASHINGTON (DOL), STATE OF
WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
City Manager Department
PORT ANGELES SCHOOL DISTRICT
City Manager Department
ADVANCED TRAVEL
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
City Manager Department
ADVANCED TRAVEL
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
DATA BASE
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
City Manager Department
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
FEB 2013 LIVESCAN CHARGES
MAR 2013 LIVESCAN CHARGES
STATE SHARE CPL'S JAN 201
STATE SHARE CPL'S FEB 201
STATE SHARE CPLS'S MAR 20
STATE SHARE CPL'S APR 201
BLDG SURCHARGE FOR MARCH
DIST CRT REV TO ST TREAS
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
City Manager Office
AWARDS LUNCHEON
Customer Commitment
Labor Rel Conf -Gates
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Human Resources
WAPR Conf -Hurd
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
SUPPLIES
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
City Clerk
City Manager Department
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
LETTERHEAD
Account Number
001 - 0000 - 229.40 -00
001 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
001 - 0000 - 237.10 -00
001 - 0000 - 237.30 -00
001 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
001 - 0000 - 239.10 -00
001 - 0000 - 213.10 -91
001 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
001 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
001 - 0000 - 229.50 -00
001 - 0000 - 229.50 -00
001 - 0000 - 229.60 -00
001 - 0000 - 229.60 -00
001 - 0000 - 229.60 -00
001 - 0000 - 229.60 -00
001 - 0000 - 229.10 -00
001 - 0000 -229 30 -00
Division Total:
Department Total:
001 - 1210- 513.42 -10
001 - 1210- 513.42 -10
001 -1210- 513.42 -10
001 - 1210- 513.42 -10
Division Total:
001 - 1211 - 513.41 -50
Division Total:
001 - 1220- 516.43 -10
001 - 1220- 516.42 -10
001 -1220- 516.42 -10
001 - 1220- 516.42 -10
001 - 1220- 516.42 -10
Division Total:
001 - 1230- 514.43 -10
001 - 1230- 514.42 -10
001 - 1230- 514.42 -10
001 - 1230 - 514.41 -50
001 - 1230 -514 42 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
001 - 2010- 514.42 -10
001 - 2010- 514.42 -10
001 -2010 -514 31 -01
Invoice Amount
230.98
1,333.66
149.67
888.66
- 180.44
50.00
10.00
-3.78
-20.46
544.00
363.00
882.00
974.00
600.00
438.00
76.50
10, 051.59
$16,387.38
$16,387.38
20.33
27.74
109.22
4.79
$162.08
1,575.00
$1,575.00
128 34
4.07
5.55
54 62
9.73
$202.31
102.55
2.03
2.77
338.74
2.14
$448.23
$2,387.62
14 23
19.42
171 00
E -8
Page 1
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
=•x^ From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Finance Department
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
JAQUELINE N. PRIMO
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
WASHINGTON ( DES/TBS), STATE OF
Finance Department
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
ELECSYS INT'L CORP
EQUIFAX
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Finance Department
MORNINGSIDE
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Finance Department
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
GREAT AMERICA LEASING CORP
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Attorney
CITY OF FORKS
CLALLAM CNTY SHERIFFS DEPT
FRIENDSHIP DIVERSION SERVICES
Attorney
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
CLALLAM CNTY DIST 1 COURT
Description Account Number
COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPF 001-2010-514.31-01
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC.
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Finance Administration
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
Excise Tax Return -March
Bank Fees
AP CHECKS
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Accounting
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
RADIX MAINTENANCE
CREDIT REPORTS
Shipping Chgs
WINDOW ENVELOPES
LADDER FOR SERVICE TRK
04 -13 a/c 271272753 -00001
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Customer Service
COMMUNICATIONS /MEDIA SERV
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL
OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS
OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS
Shipping Chgs
Reprographics
Finance Department
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
COPIER LEASE - MAY
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Attorney Office
FORKS JAIL BILL - MARCH
CL CO JAIL BILL - MARCH
FRIENDSHIP DIV 2Z0679158
Jail Contributions
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
CL.CO.D CT.COSTS APRIL
001 - 2010- 514.42 -10
001 - 2010- 514.31 -01
001 - 2010 -514 42 -10
Division Total:
001 - 2023 - 514.42 -10
001 - 2023 - 514.42 -10
001 - 2023 - 514.49 -50
001- 2023 - 514.49 -90
001 - 2023 - 514.31 -01
001 - 2023 - 514.31 -01
001 -2023- 514.42 -10
Division Total:
001 - 2025 - 514.42 -10
001 - 2025 - 514.42 -10
001 - 2025 - 514.41 -50
001 - 2025 - 514.41 -50
001 - 2025 - 514.48 -10
001 - 2025 - 514.31 -01
001 - 2025 - 514.31 -80
001 - 2025 - 514.42 -10
001 - 2025 - 514.42 -10
Division Total:
001 - 2080 - 514.41 -50
001 - 2080 - 514.31 -01
001 - 2080 - 514.45 -31
001 - 2080 - 514.45 -31
001 - 2080 - 514.42 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
001 - 3010- 515.42 -10
001 - 3010- 515.42 -10
001 -3010- 515.45 -31
001- 3010- 515.42 -10
001- 3010 -515 42 -10
Division Total:
001 - 3012 -598 51 -23
001 - 3012 - 598.51 -23
001 - 3012 - 598.51 -23
Division Total:
001 - 3021 - 515.42 -10
001 - 3021 - 515.42 -10
001 - 3021 -515 50 -90
Invoice Amount
93.75
54.57
1,721.99
13.64
$2,088.60
18.30
24 97
179.88
9.00
965.84
28.92
4.35
$1,231.26
26.44
36.07
254.00
75.14
59.03
1,640.20
30.32
67.99
24.62
$2,213.81
855.00
1,847.14
96.42
46.46
44.00
$2,889.02
$8,422.69
12.20
16.65
187.68
54.56
6.71
$277.80
6,930 00
58,323 20
290.00
$65,543.20
8.13
11.10
10_00773
Page 2
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date: 5/16/2013
Vendor
DICKSON, DENNIS
GREAT AMERICA LEASING CORP
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Attorney
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
PA DOWNTOWN ASSN
SOUND PUBLISHING INC
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Community Development
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
NORTH PENINSULA BLDG ASSOC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Community Development
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON ( DES/TBS), STATE OF
Community Development
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
DELL MARKETING LP
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PORT ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON ( DES/TBS), STATE OF
Police Department
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK - QWEST
Description
DICKSON FOR WSAMA COVER
COPIER LEASE - MAY
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Prosecution
Attorney
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
1ST QUARTER
Account Number
001 - 3021 - 515.41 -50
001 - 3021 - 515.45 -31
001 - 3021 - 515.42 -10
001 -3021- 515.42 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
001 - 4010- 558.42 -10
001 - 4010- 558.42 -10
001 - 4010- 558.41 -50
COMMUNICATIONS /MEDIA SERV 001 - 4010 - 558.44 -10
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL 001 - 4010 - 558.42 -10
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION 001 - 4010 - 558.42 -10
Planning Division Total:
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B 001 - 4020 - 524.42 -10
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B 001 - 4020 - 524.42 -10
BLDG ASSOC DINNER MTG - R 001 - 4020 - 524.31 -01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001- 4020 - 524.31 -01
04 -15 a/c 264230412 -00003 001- 4020 - 524.42 -10
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION 001- 4020 - 524.42 -10
Building Division Total:
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B 001 - 4030 - 559.42 -10
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B 001 - 4030 - 559.42 -10
04 -15 a/c 264230412 -00003 001 - 4030 - 559.42 -10
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION 001 - 4030 - 559.42 -10
Code Compliance Division Total:
Community Development Department Total:
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE 001 - 5010 - 521.42 -12
04 -23 NC 206T031979835B 001 - 5010 - 521.42 -10
04 -23 A/C 206T411918873B 001 - 5010 - 521.42 -10
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B 001 - 5010 - 521.42 -10
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B 001 - 5010 - 521.42 -10
COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPHI 001-5010-521.31-60
Sound Bar 001 - 5010 - 521.31 -60
Surge protector 001 -5010- 521.31 -60
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001 - 5010 - 521.31 -01
Pizza /Advisory Board Mtg 001 - 5010 - 521.31 -01
EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 001- 5010 - 521.49 -01
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL 001 - 5010 - 521.42 -10
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION 001 - 5010 - 521.42 -10
Police Administration Division Total:
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE 001 - 5021 - 521.42 -12
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B 001 - 5021 - 521.42 -10
Invoice Amount
375.00
187.69
109.13
4.13
$10,702.91
$76,523.91
15.25
20.81
5,000.00
110.60
27.28
22.04
$5,195.98
5.29
7.21
10.00
7.12
43.44
0.29
$73.35
0.81
1.11
29.08
2.65
$33.65
$5,302.98
66.96
64.74
114.92
32.54
44.39
956.17
28.44
36.03
58 57
29.24
350.00
149.67
46.35
$1,978.02
202.03
20.33
E -10
Page 3
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date* 5/16/2013
Vendor
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
LINCOLN STREET STATION
PORT ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Police Department
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
LINCOLN STREET STATION
Lucan DeGand
MPH INDUSTRIES INC
PORT ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
SAFEWAY INC
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Police Department
VERIZON WIRELESS
Police Department
ADVANCED TRAVEL
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
LEADSONLINE
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
QUILL CORPORATION
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Police Department
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
Description
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
EXTERNAL LABOR
Bridge Toll
Beverage Supplies -Trng
Beverages -Trng
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Investigation
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
EXTERNAL LABOR
EXTERNAL LABOR
CHEWY.COM 16 BAGS OF K9 F
CO -OP ORDER OF 1 15LB K9
CONTRL,INDICA,RECORD INST
Office Supplies
Shipping
Bridge Toll
Bridge toll (3 cars)
POLICE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Patrol
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
Reserves & Volunteers
WCIA/WAPRO-Canno
Intvw Panelist - Schilke
WCIA/WAPRO - Shilke
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV
OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS
OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Records
Police Department
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
Account Number
001 - 5021 - 521.42 -10
001 - 5021 - 521.42 -10
001 - 5021 - 521.43 -10
001 - 5021 - 521.43 -10
001- 5021 - 521.43 -10
001 - 5021 -521 42 -10
001 - 5021 - 521.42 -10
Division Total:
001 - 5022 - 521.42 -10
001 - 5022 - 521.42 -10
001 - 5022 - 521.42 -10
001 - 5022 - 521.42 -10
001 - 5022 - 521.49 -80
001 - 5022 - 521.49 -80
001- 5022 - 521.35 -01
001 - 5022 - 521.31 -01
001 - 5022 - 521.42 -10
001 - 5022 - 521.43 -10
001 - 5022 - 521.43 -10
001 - 5022 - 521.31 -01
001 - 5022 - 521.42 -10
001 - 5022 - 521.42 -10
Division Total:
001 - 5026- 521.42 -10
Division Total:
001 - 5029 - 521.43 -10
001 - 5029 - 521.43 -10
001 - 5029 - 521.43 -10
001 - 5029 - 521.42 -10
001 - 5029 - 521.42 -10
001 - 5029 - 521.41 -50
001 - 5029 - 521.45 -31
001- 5029 - 521.45 -31
001 - 5029 - 521.31 -01
001 - 5029 - 521.42 -10
001 - 5029 - 521.42 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
001 - 6010- 522.42 -12
001 - 6010 - 522.42 -10
001 - 6010 - 522.42 -10
001 - 6010- 522.42 -11
Invoice Amount
27.74
29.14
18.15
14.61
11.22
567.56
13.61
$904.39
56.94
77.69
10.02
14.36
615.26
33.62
2,058.52
13.24
33.09
5.00
15.00
5.42
2,347.68
35.96
$5,321.80
34.52
$34.52
415.30
48.60
196.30
20.33
27.74
2,328.44
58.93
136.44
43.43
27.85
10.69
$3,314.05
$11,552.78
334 80
28.47
38.84
8.13
E -11
Page 4
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
QUILL CORPORATION
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
WHEELER, CORAL
Fire Department
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
SEAWESTERN INC
SUNSET DO -IT BEST HARDWARE
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Fire Department
ADVANCED TRAVEL
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
PORT ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Department
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
R D J Specialties, Inc
NFPA
VERIZON WIRELESS
Fire Department
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Fire Department
FERRELLGAS INC
MRS CLEAN
PORT ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Department
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
Fire Department
ADVANCED TRAVEL
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
Description
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS
PAPER (OFFICE,PRINT SHOP)
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
PUBLIC SAFETY BOARD MEETI
Fire Administration
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
BOATS,MOTORS,& MARINE SUP
BOATS,MOTORS,& MARINE SUP
PROSTHETIC,HEARING AID ET
BOATS,MOTORS,& MARINE SUP
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Fire Supression
Fire Acdmy Trng -Fire Dept
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
POSTAGE
Fire Volunteers
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
FIRE PREVENTION STICKERS
NFPA MEMBERSHIP
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
Fire Prevention
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Fire Training
PROPANE
BUILDING MAINT &REPAIR SER
SUPPLIES
Facilities Maintenance
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
Emergency Management
Fire Department
TCS Recert- Mahlum
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
Account Number
001 - 6010- 522.42 -11
001- 6010- 522.45 -31
001 - 6010 - 522.31 -01
001 - 6010- 522.42 -10
001 - 6010- 522.42 -11
001 - 6010 - 522.31 -01
Division Total:
001 - 6020 - 522.42 -10
001 - 6020 - 522.42 -10
001 - 6020 - 522.35 -01
001 - 6020 - 522.31 -02
001 - 6020 - 522.31 -11
001 - 6020 - 522.31 -02
001 - 6020 - 522.42 -10
Division Total:
001 - 6021 - 522.43 -10
001- 6021 - 522.42 -10
001 -6021- 522.42 -10
001 - 6021 - 522.42 -10
Division Total:
001 - 6030 - 522.42 -10
001 - 6030 - 522.42 -10
001 - 6030 - 522.31 -01
001 - 6030 - 522.49 -01
001 - 6030 - 522.42 -10
Division Total:
001 -6040- 522.42 -10
001 - 6040 - 522.42 -10
001 - 6040 - 522.42 -10
Division Total:
001 - 6050 - 522.47 -10
001 - 6050 - 522.41 -50
001 - 6050 - 522.31 -01
Division Total:
001 - 6060 - 525.42 -10
001- 6060 - 525.42 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
001 - 7010- 532.43 -10
001 - 7010- 532.42 -12
001 - 7010- 532.42 -12
001- 7010 -532 42 -10
001 - 7010- 532.42 -10
Invoice Amount
11.10
53.77
192.38
5.68
24.40
45.09
$742.66
26.44
36.07
188.94
104.82
4.10
5.93
0.77
$367.07
265.36
2.03
2.77
2.76
$272.92
4.07
5.55
48.68
165.00
54.57
$277.87
4.07
5.55
9.22
$18.84
657.49
395 00
60.89
$1,113.38
18.30
24.97
$43.27
$2,836.01
311.62
108.40
108.40
63.04
86.01
E -12
Page 5
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PROTHMAN
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Public Works -Gen Fnd
ADVANCED TRAVEL
ASM SIGNS
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
VERIZON WIRELESS
WA RECREATION & PARK ASSN/WRPA
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
WASHINGTON (OASI), STATE OF
Parks Dept
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
WASHINGTON ( DES/TBS), STATE OF
Parks Dept
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
QUIRING MONUMENTS INC
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
WASHINGTON (OASI), STATE OF
Parks Dept
AMSAN
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
Description
OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS
PW & U DIRECTOR SEARCH
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
04 -28 a/c 271138138 -00002
04 -22 a/c 571136182 -00001
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Pub Wks Administration
Public Works -Gen Fnd
WRPA Conf - Delikat
SIGNS, SIGN MATERIAL
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
COPYING MACHINE SUPPLIES
OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS
04 -22 a/c 571136182 -00005
MEMBERSHIPS
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
1st Quarter Unemployment
Parks Administration
04 -20 NC 206T217227465B
05 -02 NC 36041 71 94241 3B
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
COPYING MACHINE SUPPLIES
OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS
OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Senior Center
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
Excise Tax Return -March
CEMETERY MARKERS
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS
04 -22 a/c 571136182 -00005
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
1st Quarter Unemployment
Ocean View Cemetery
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS
BRUSHES (NOT CLASSIFIED)
Account Number
001- 7010 - 532.45 -31
001 - 7010- 532.41 -50
001 - 7010- 532.42 -10
001 - 7010 - 532.42 -10
001 - 7010- 532.42 -10
001 - 7010- 532.42 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
001 - 8010- 574.43 -10
001 - 8010 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8010- 574.42 -10
001 - 8010- 574.42 -10
001 - 8010 - 574.31 -01
001 - 8010- 574.45 -31
001 - 8010- 574.42 -10
001 - 8010 - 574.49 -01
001 - 8010- 574.42 -10
001 - 8010- 574.20 -60
Division Total:
001 - 8012- 555.42 -10
001 - 8012- 555.42 -10
001 - 8012- 555.42 -10
001 - 8012- 555.42 -10
001 - 8012 - 555.31 -01
001 - 8012- 555.45 -31
001 - 8012- 555.45 -31
001 - 8012- 555.42 -10
Division Total:
001 - 8050 - 536.42 -12
001 - 8050 - 536.42 -12
001 - 8050 - 536.42 -10
001 - 8050 - 536.42 -10
001 - 8050 - 536.49 -50
001 - 8050 -536 34 -01
001- 8050 - 536.31 -20
001 - 8050 - 536.42 -10
001 - 8050 - 536.42 -10
001 - 8050 -536 20 -60
Division Total:
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -20
001- 8080 - 576.31 -20
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -20
Invoice Amount
389.24
2,658.43
54.57
37.89
111.56
59.42
$3,988.58
$3,988.58
631.66
1,118.68
6.10
8.32
92.06
14.72
38.00
260.00
10.54
6,644.00
$8,824.08
57.46
42.10
6.10
8.32
70.40
13.26
74.12
1.62
$273.38
202.03
202.03
4.07
5.55
221.42
145.00
12.98
62.49
2.43
888.52
$1,746.52
42.08
57 20
12 77
E -13
Page 6
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
BAXTER AUTO PARTS #15
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
HEARTLINE
HOLCOMB & COMPANY, D
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PACIFIC POWER PRODUCTS
SARGENT ENGINEERING, INC
SUNSET DO -IT BEST HARDWARE
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
THURMAN SUPPLY
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (OASI), STATE OF
Parks Dept
ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY INC
Facilities Maintenance
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
VERIZON WIRELESS
Facilities Maintenance
AMSAN
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
Description
BRUSHES (NOT CLASSIFIED)
TAPE(NOT DP,SOUND,VIDEO)
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS
BELTS AND BELTING
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
NURSERY STOCK & SUPPLIES
ROAD /HWY MAT NONASPHALTIC
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
BELTS AND BELTING
ENGINEERING SERVICES
BEARINGS (EXCEPT WHEEL)
BRUSHES (NOT CLASSIFIED)
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS
PIPE FITTINGS
PIPE FITTINGS
PIPE FITTINGS
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
04 -22 a/c 571136182 -00003
1st Quarter Unemployment
Park Facilities
Parks Dept
POISONS.AGRICUL & INDUSTR
Senior Center Facilities
05 -02 NC 3604170786905B
05 -02 NC 3604175328784B
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
PAINTS,COATINGS,WALLPAPER
PAINTS,COATINGS,WALLPAPER
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS
04 -22 a/c 571136182 -00005
Custodial /Janitorial Svcs
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
Account Number
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -20
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -20
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -20
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -01
001 -8080- 576.42 -12
001- 8080 - 576.42 -12
001 - 8080 - 576.42 -10
001 -8080- 576.42 -10
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -40
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -20
001 - 8080 - 576.42 -10
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -01
001 - 8080 - 576.48 -10
001 - 8080 -576 31 -01
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -20
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -20
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -20
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -40
001 -8080- 576.31 -20
001 -8080- 576.31 -20
001 - 8080 - 576.31 -20
001- 8080 - 576.31 -20
001 - 8080 - 576.42 -10
001 - 8080 - 576.42 -10
001 -8080- 576.20 -60
Division Total:
Department Total:
001 - 8112- 555.48 -10
Division Total:
001- 8130- 518.42 -10
001- 8130- 518.42 -10
001 - 8130- 518.42 -10
001 - 8130- 518.42 -10
001 - 8130 - 518.31 -01
001 - 8130 - 518.31 -01
001 - 8130 - 518.31 -01
001 - 8130- 518.42 -10
Division Total:
001- 8131 - 518.31 -01
HAND TOOLS ,POW &NON POWER 001-8131-518.31-20
BRUSHES (NOT CLASSIFIED) 001- 8131 - 518.31 -20
BRUSHES (NOT CLASSIFIED) 001 - 8131 - 518.31 -20
Invoice Amount
23.49
9.55
39.89
20.25
305 92
305.92
20.33
27.74
130.08
1,001.42
16.26
267.48
1,571.82
6.05
39.70
16.16
8.91
19.17
24.37
19.36
30.19
25.05
54.57
160.60
7,146.06
$11,402.39
$22,246.37
63.20
$63.20
32.77
41.72
2 03
2 77
3.76
22.57
22.67
19.00
$147.29
94.76
11.83
47.86
37.20
E -14
Page 7
fry7,;ai�'
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC
ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY INC
PORT ANGELES POWER EQUIPMENT
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Facilities Maintenance
BILLS PLUMBING & HEATING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
CHAPMAN JR, HOWARD E
HEILMAN, JOHN
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PIMENTEL, HENRY
RAMSEY, SCOTT
RICHARDSON, ERIC D
ROONEY, RANDY L
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
THAYER, JEFFREY
WHITTEN, BILL P
Recreation Activities
ANDERSEN, BRIAN L
AT &T BUSINESS SERVICE
CAPTAIN T'S
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
DARLING, ROBERT L
DOBYNS, THERESA
EDGAR, KELSEY
FAIRCHILD, NICK
FRAZIER, BRIAN D
HALTTUNEN, DESHAWN A
HANSEN'S TROPHY
Description Account Number
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001 -8131- 518.31 -20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001 -8131- 518.31 -20
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B 001 -8131- 518.42 -10
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B 001 - 8131 - 518.42 -10
PIPE FITTINGS 001 - 8131 - 518.31 -20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001 -8131- 518.31 -20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001 -8131- 518.31 -20
POISONS:AGRICUL & INDUSTR 001 - 8131 - 518.48 -10
PIPE FITTINGS 001 - 8131 - 518.31 -20
HAND TOOLS ,POW &NON POWER 001 -8131- 518.35 -01
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001 -8131- 518.31 -20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001 -8131- 518.31 -20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001 - 8131 -518 31 -20
Central Svcs Facilities Division Total:
Facilities Maintenance Department Total:
SHANE PARK SANIKAN 4/25 -5
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
UMPIRE PAYMENT FOR KICKOF
UMPIRE PAYMENT FOR KICKOF
OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS
UMPIRE PAYMENT FOR KICKOF
UMPIRE PAYMENT FOR KICKOF
UMPIRE PAYMENT FOR KICKOF
UMPIRE PAYMENT FOR KICKOF
SPORTING & ATHLETIC EQUIP
UMPIRE PAYMENT FOR KICKOF
SOFTBALL UMPIRE PAYMENT -K
Sports Programs
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H
Dan Estes Cell
CLOTHING & APPAREL
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H
001 -8221- 574.41 -50
001 -8221- 574.42 -10
001 -8221- 574.42 -10
001 - 8221 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8221 - 574.41 -50
001 -8221- 574.45 -31
001 -8221- 574.41 -50
001 -8221- 574.41 -50
001 -8221- 574.41 -50
001 - 8221 - 574.41 -50
001 -8221- 574.31 -01
001 -8221- 574.41 -50
001 - 8221 - 574.41 -50
Division Total:
001 -8222- 574.41 -50
001 - 8222 - 574.42 -10
001 - 8222 - 574.31 -01
001 -8222- 574.42 -10
001 -8222- 574.42 -10
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
SCOREKEEPER PAYMENT FOR M 001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H 001 -8222- 574.41 -50
SCOREKEEPER PAYMENT FOR M 001 -8222- 574.41 -50
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H 001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H 001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 001 -8222- 574.31 -01
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 001 - 8222 - 574.31 -01
Invoice Amount
19.67
44.87
2.03
2.77
52.96
9.25
28.61
83.16
200.43
1,673.52
69.28
37.91
32 49
$2,448.60
$2,659.09
270.00
2.03
2.77
88.00
198.00
36.80
176.00
88.00
132.00
198.00
626.73
242.00
110.00
$2,170.33
264.00
10.38
884.54
2.03
2.77
110.00
20.00
132.00
120.00
110 00
264.00
424.93
325.20
E -15
Page 8
Gzikt 04*
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date* 5/16/2013
Vendor
HENSEN, JAMES C
(SETT, TRISTAN J
JEFFERS, KYLEE B
KETCHUM III, JOHN W
LEINART, TOM
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PIMENTEL, HENRY
RAMSEY, EMILY
RAMSEY, SCOTT
ROBINSON, JASON
RODOCKER, PAXTON
ROONEY, RANDY L
SADDLER, CHARLES M
THOMAS, GREGORY
WARDELL, ADAM
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
WILSON, DONALD L
Recreation Activities
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON ( DES/TBS), STATE OF
Recreation Activities
A -1 PERFORMANCE, INC
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
HOLCOMB & COMPANY, D
LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC
QUARRY, THE PORT ANGELES, LLC
SUNSET DO -IT BEST HARDWARE
Description
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H
SCOREKEEPER PAYMENT FOR M
SCOREKEEPER PAYMENT FOR M
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY T
OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H
SCOREKEEPER PAYMENT FOR M
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H
SCOREKEEPER PAYMENT FOR M
SCOREKEEPER PAYMENT FOR M
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
REFEREE PAYMENT FOR MAY H
Special Events
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
04 -22 a/c 571136182 -00005
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Youth /Family Programs
Recreation Activities
General Fund
BUILDING MAINT &REPAIR SER
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
Shipping Chgs
ROAD /HWY MAT NONASPHALTIC
ROAD /HWY MAT NONASPHALTIC
ROAD /HWY MATERIALS ASPHLT
ROAD /HWY MAT NONASPHALTIC
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS
Account Number
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8222 - 574.45 -31
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8222- 574.41 -50
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8222- 574.41 -50
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
001 - 8222- 574.42 -10
001 - 8222 - 574.41 -50
Division Total:
001- 8224 - 574.42 -10
001 - 8224 - 574.42 -10
001 - 8224 - 574.42 -10
001 - 8224 - 574.42 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
102 - 7230 - 542.41 -50
102 - 7230 - 542.31 -01
102- 7230 - 542.31 -20
102 - 7230 - 542.31 -20
102- 7230 - 542.42 -12
102- 7230 - 542.42 -12
102- 7230 - 542.42 -10
102- 7230 - 542.42 -10
102- 7230 - 542.42 -10
102- 7230 - 542.31 -20
102- 7230 - 542.31 -20
102- 7230 - 542.31 -20
102- 7230 - 542.31 -20
102- 7230 -542 31 -01
102 - 7230 - 542.31 -20
102 - 7230 - 542.31 -20
102- 7230 - 542.31 -25
Invoice Amount
242.00
120.00
120.00
132.00
132.00
73.60
220.00
50.00
242.00
100.00
100.00
264.00
264.00
110.00
264.00
5.23
264.00
$5,372.68
2.03
2.77
38.00
1.62
$44.42
$7,587.43
$159,894.84
84.94
10.84
35.00
8.86
117.18
117.18
10.17
13.87
25 11
1,311.24
1,177.13
714.55
7.23
61.92
11.00
44.17
29.24
E -16
Page 9
r'4
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
SUNSET DO -IT BEST HARDWARE
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
THURMAN SUPPLY
TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPLY CO
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
WASHINGTON (OASI), STATE OF
Public Works- Street
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
INDEPENDENT BIBLE CHURCH
LAUREL BLACK DESIGN
M & S BREWER PROPERTIES, LLC
PENINSULA DEVELOPMENT ASSN
VERIZON WIRELESS
Economic Development
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
QUALITY LOGO PRODUCTS
ADVANCED TRAVEL
CAPTAIN T'S
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
NEW WORLD SYSTEMS
Description Account Number
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102 - 7230 - 542.31 -25
HAND TOOLS ,POW &NON POWER 102 - 7230 - 542.35 -01
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102 - 7230 - 542.31 -25
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 102 - 7230 - 542.31 -20
MARKERS, PLAQUES,SIGNS 102 - 7230 - 542.31 -25
04 -22 a/c 571136182 -00003 102 - 7230 - 542.42 -10
04 -28 a/c 271138138 -00004 102 - 7230 - 542.42 -10
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION 102 - 7230 - 542.42 -10
1st Quarter Unemployment 102 - 7230 - 542.20 -60
Street Division Total:
Public Works- Street Department Total:
Street Fund Fund Total:
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B 103 -1511- 558.42 -10
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B 103 - 1511 - 558.42 -10
GRANT 103- 1511- 558.49 -91
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 103 - 1511 - 558.41 -50
GRANT 103- 1511- 558.49 -91
CONSULTING SERVICES 103 - 1511 - 558.41 -50
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL 103 - 1511 - 558.42 -10
Economic Development Division Total:
Economic Development Department Total:
Economic Development Fund Total:
Excise Tax Return -March 107- 0000 - 237.00 -00
OFFICE SUPPLY,INKS,LEADS 107 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
ACOUST TILE, INSULAT MAT 107 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
PRINTING,SILK SCR,TYPSET 107 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
WCIA/WAPRO- O'Connor
SS911 CCID- Brooks
New World Conf- Brooks
Zetron MicroData Demo -DH
ACCIS Conf- Christopher
New World Conf -Homan
CLOTHING & APPAREL
04 -20 A/C 206Z200017790B
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
05 -02 A/C 360Z020380301B
COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC.
COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC.
COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC
Division Total:
Department Total:
107- 5160- 528.43 -10
107- 5160- 528.43 -11
107- 5160- 528.43 -11
107 - 5160 -528 43 -11
107- 5160- 528.43 -11
107- 5160- 528.43 -11
107- 5160- 528.20 -80
107- 5160- 528.42 -10
107- 5160- 528.42 -10
107- 5160- 528.42 -10
107 - 5160 -528 42 -11
107- 5160- 594.65 -10
107- 5160- 594.65 -10
107 - 5160 -594 65 -10
Invoice Amount
12.67
42.47
28.05
15.70
350.10
149.61
67.39
3.83
596 09
$5,045.54
$5,045.54
$5,045.54
1.02
1.39
1,756.85
450.00
1,680.20
200.00
27.28
$4,116.74
$4,116.74
$4,116.74
1,531.52
-42 40
- 120.12
-32.35
$1,336.65
$1,336.65
344.20
109.55
443.11
109.55
170.82
513.67
219.92
199 03
54.90
74 91
1,066.75
2,276.40
813.00
1,120 00
E -17
Page 10
:F
4
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
NEW WORLD SYSTEMS
PORT ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC
QUALITY LOGO PRODUCTS
QUILL CORPORATION
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
WASHINGTON (OASI), STATE OF
Pencom
PORT ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
Firearms Range
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
HD SUPPLY POWER SOLUTIONS, LTD
BALLARD, ESTATE OF ELEANOR
BLAGDON, LISA D
BRADSHAW, DANIEL
BURBICK, CLARENCE P
CROMBIE, JAMES F
JAMES & ASSOCIATES
MCDOUGALL, MICKEY L
POSTMUS, HOLLY L
PRIMO, JACQUELINE N
SKERBECK, CASSANDRA TIANA
SMITH, VIVIAN HALL
STAGG, JAMES H
TWINSTAR CREDIT UNION
VANWALD, EDWARD H
WILLIAMS, GARY G
Description
COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC
COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC
Cable USB to serial
EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
TEXTILE,FIBERS,LINENS
PRINTING PREPARATIONS
PRINTING,SILK SCR,TYPSET
ACOUST TILE, INSULAT MAT
PRINTING,SILK SCR,TYPSET
ACOUST TILE, INSULAT MAT
OFFICE SUPPLY,INKS,LEADS
OFFICE SUPPLY,INKS,LEADS
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
1st Quarter Unemployment
Pencom
Pencom
Pencom Fund
Medical Battery
Firearms Range
Firearms Range
Firearms Range
Excise Tax Return -March
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
FINAL BILL REFUND
FINAL BILL REFUND
OVERPAYMENT -1938 W 7TH ST
FINAL BILL REFUND
FINAL BILL REFUND
FINAL REFUND -1520 C ST #7
FINAL BILL REFUND
FINAL BILL REFUND
FINAL BILL REFUND
FINAL BILL REFUND
FINAL BILL REFUND
FINAL BILL REFUND
FINAL REFUND -906 W 12TH
OVERPAYMENT -906 W 12TH ST
OVERPAYMENT -708 CAROLINE
FINAL BILL REFUND
Account Number
107- 5160- 594.65 -10
107- 5160- 594.65 -10
107- 5160- 528.31 -60
107- 5160- 528.49 -01
107 -5160- 528.31 -61
107- 5160- 528.31 -61
107- 5160- 528.31 -61
107- 5160- 528.31 -61
107- 5160- 528.31 -61
107 -5160- 528.31 -61
107- 5160- 528.31 -61
107- 5160- 528.31 -61
107- 5160- 528.31 -01
107- 5160- 528.42 -10
107- 5160- 528.42 -10
107- 5160- 528.20 -60
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
178- 5351 - 521.35 -01
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
401 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
401 - 0000 - 141.41 -00
401 - 0000 - 141.41 -00
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
Invoice Amount
1,300.80
19,425.28
21.67
200.00
288.33
115.60
13.53
1,327 62
50.00
172.47
502.40
44.66
66.13
163.71
70.42
557.20
$31,835.63
$31,835.63
$33,172.28
4.65
$4.65
$4.65
$4.65
142.23
2,357.48
304.06
33 06
31.22
316.64
257.11
234.08
37.08
101 34
79.88
1.93
97.35
392.51
93 71
27.75
141.72
128.92
217.05
E -18
Page 11
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
WINSLOW, LAUREN FERN
US LIGHTING TECH
WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC
ADVANCED TRAVEL
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Public Works - Electric
ADVANCED TRAVEL
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
WASHINGTON (OASI), STATE OF
Public Works - Electric
A -1 PERFORMANCE, INC
ADVANCED TRAVEL
ALDERGROVE CONSTRUCTION INC
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
CANON USA, INC
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CAPTAIN T'S
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
CERTIFIED HEARING INC
COLUMBIA RURAL ELECTRIC ASSN, INC
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
DIRECTV
Description
FINAL BILL REFUND
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
NWPPAEO Conf - Dahlquist
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
04 -22 a/c 571136182 -00001
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Engineering - Electric
LMV/WPAG -Lusk
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
Shipping Chgs
PW CONSTRUCTION & RELATED
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
1st Quarter Unemployment
Power Systems
BUILDING MAINT &REPAIR SER
Truck to repair- Beckett
ROADSIDE,GRNDS,REC, PARK
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS
RENTAL OR LEASE SERVICES
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP /SUP
05 -02 a/c 206Z020411942B
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
AUDIOGRAM - A HAINSTOCK
PW CONSTRUCTION & RELATED
SCHOOL EQUIP& SUPPLIES
Excise Tax Return -March
TELEVISION EQUIP & ACESS
Account Number
401 - 0000 - 122.10 -99
401 - 0000 - 141.41 -00
401 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
401 - 0000 - 141.41 -00
401 - 0000 - 141.41 -00
401 - 0000 - 141.41 -00
Division Total:
Department Total:
401 - 7111- 533.43 -10
401 - 7111- 533.42 -12
401- 7111- 533.42 -12
401 - 7111- 533.42 -10
401 - 7111- 533.42 -10
401 - 7111- 533.42 -10
401 - 7111- 533.42 -10
Division Total:
401 - 7120- 533.43 -10
401 - 7120- 533.42 -12
401 - 7120- 533.42 -12
401 - 7120- 533.42 -10
401 - 7120- 533.42 -10
401 - 7120- 533.42 -10
401 - 7120- 533.33 -50
401 - 7120- 533.42 -10
401- 7120- 533.20 -60
Division Total:
401 -7180- 533.41 -50
401 - 7180- 533.43 -10
401 - 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180- 533.34 -02
401 - 7180- 533.45 -31
401- 7180- 533.42 -12
401 - 7180- 533.42 -12
401- 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180- 533.42 -10
401 - 7180- 533.42 -10
401 - 7180- 533.42 -10
401 - 7180- 533.49 -90
401 - 7180- 533.31 -01
401 - 7180- 533.43 -10
401 - 7180- 533.49 -50
401 - 7180- 533.42 -10
Invoice Amount
9.34
4,798.92
- 371.88
1,786.65
3,218.50
294.78
$14,731.43
$14,731.43
709.99
100.44
100.44
6.10
8.32
52.92
4.50
$982.71
93.65
100.44
100.44
6.10
8.32
15.66
11, 006.07
18.50
1,337.25
$12,686.43
176.04
30.50
1,727.90
1.11
176.61
2,826.94
2,826.94
202.71
96.69
48.80
66.59
25 00
55 44
76.62
176,658 63
50.99
E -19
Page 12
n, .1 :f7
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
GRAINGER
H & R PARTS & EQUIPMENT INC
HD SUPPLY POWER SOLUTIONS, LTD
MALLORY COMPANY
MASON COUNTY PUD #3
MATCO TOOLS
Brent Robinson
George Drake
Richard Hixson
Description
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP /SUP
EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
MEAL REIMBURSEMENT
MEAL REIMBURSEMENT
MEAL REIMBURSEMENTS
MEAL REIMBURSEMENTS
Account Number
401 - 7180 - 533.31 -01
401- 7180 - 533.34 -02
401 -7180- 533.34 -02
401 - 7180 - 533.31 -01
401 - 7180 - 533.41 -50
401 - 7180 -533 35 -01
401 -7180- 533.31 -01
401 - 7180 - 533.31 -01
401 -7180- 533.31 -01
401 - 7180 - 533.31 -01
OLYMPIC LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANERS LAUNDRY /DRY CLEANING SERV 401 - 7180 - 533.41 -50
LAUNDRY /DRY CLEANING SERV 401 -7180- 533.41 -50
OLYMPIC PARTY & CUSTODIAL SUPPLIE:PAPER & PLASTIC - DISPOSABL 401 -7180- 533.31 -01
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC RENTAL OR LEASE SERVICES 401 - 7180 - 533.45 -31
PORT ANGELES POWER EQUIPMENT ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401 -7180- 533.35 -01
PORT ANGELES TIRE FACTORY
PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY
PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC
QUILL CORPORATION
ROHLINGER ENTERPRISES INC
SCHWEITZER ENGINEERING LABS
SNAP -ON TOOLS - CHUGGER DEANE
SUNSET DO -IT BEST HARDWARE
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP.
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
401 - 7180- 533.35 -01
401 - 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180 - 533.34 -02
401 - 7180 - 533.31 -01
401 - 7180 - 533.31 -01
401 -7180- 533.31 -01
401 - 7180 - 533.31 -01
401 - 7180 - 533.31 -01
401 -7180- 533.31 -01
401 - 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180 -533 48 -10
401 - 7180 -533 48 -10
401 - 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180- 533.48 -10
401- 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180- 533.48 -10
401 - 7180 - 533.34 -02
401 -7180 -533 35 -01
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 401 - 7180 - 533.34 -02
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 401 - 7180 - 533.34 -02
Invoice Amount
136.45
46.81
89.97
796.59
3,780.21
73.44
30 50
30.50
30.50
30.50
74.76
74.76
158.39
120.76
36.80
10.84
44.15
613.69
78.33
272.48
11.91
59.60
75.77
736.47
92.52
98.32
98.32
98.32
98 32
139.88
522.49
98.32
98.32
98 32
98.32
98.32
20.60
1,786.98
292.68
215.01
2.74
6.34
E -20
Page 13
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
SUNSET DO -IT BEST HARDWARE
THURMAN SUPPLY
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR
VERIZON WIRELESS
WAGNER -SMITH EQUIPMENT CO
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC
Public Works- Electric
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
AIRPORT GARDEN CENTER
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
EDGE ANALYTICAL
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
FOSTER PEPPER PLLC
Michael C Puntenney
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE
SUMMIT SAFETY SHOES, LLC
SUNSET DO -IT BEST HARDWARE
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
USA BLUEBOOK
Description
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
Shipping Chgs
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
04 -22 a/c 571136182 -00002
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
Electric Operations
Public Works- Electric
Electric Utility Fund
Excise Tax Return -March
SEED,SOD,SOIL &INOCULANT
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -23 a/c 206T411255315B
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
Excise Tax Return -March
TESTING &CALIBRATION SERVI
TESTING &CALIBRATION SERVI
Shipping Chgs
Account Number
401 -7180- 533.34 -02
401 - 7180 - 533.34 -02
401 - 7180 - 533.34 -02
401 - 7180- 533.42 -10
401 - 7180 -533 49 -90
401 - 7180- 533.42 -10
401 - 7180- 533.42 -10
401 - 7180 - 533.34 -02
401 - 7180- 533.35 -01
401 - 7180- 533.42 -10
401 - 7180- 533.34 -02
401 - 7180- 533.34 -02
401 - 7180- 533.34 -02
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
402 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
Division Total:
Department Total:
402 - 7380 - 534.31 -20
402 - 7380 - 534.42 -12
402 - 7380 - 534.42 -12
402 - 7380 - 534.42 -10
402 - 7380 - 534.42 -10
402 - 7380 - 534.42 -10
402 - 7380 - 534.49 -50
402 - 7380 - 534.41 -50
402 - 7380 - 534.41 -50
402 - 7380 - 534.42 -10
HAND TOOLS ,POW &NON POWER402- 7380 - 534.35 -01
HAND TOOLS ,POW &NON POWER402- 7380 - 534.35 -01
402 - 7380 -534 41 -50
402 - 7380 - 534.31 -01
402 - 7380 - 534.31 -01
HAND TOOLS ,POW &NON POWER 402-7380-534.35-01
SHOES AND BOOTS 402- 7380 - 534.31 -01
HAND TOOLS ,POW &NON POWER402- 7380 - 534.35 -01
BOTTLED WATER 402 - 7380 - 534.31 -20
TESTING &CALIBRATION SERVI 402 - 7380 - 534.41 -50
TESTING &CALIBRATION SERVI 402 - 7380 - 534.41 -50
PW CONSTRUCTION & RELATED 402 - 7380 - 534.31 -01
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 402 - 7380 - 534.35 -01
FLUORIDE APPEAL
ELWHA SEDIMENT RESEARCH
SUPPLIES
Invoice Amount
59.60
478.01
2.27
15.93
27.56
57.60
155.55
50.31
184.05
18.16
- 2,627.62
1,026 55
1,021.95
$196,895.73
$210,564.87
$225,296.30
199 89
$199.89
$199.89
43.35
1,261.69
1,261.69
64.59
18.30
24.97
17,013.14
524.00
45.00
17.34
125.42
413.68
2,833 25
120.54
494.89
149.53
150.00
50.02
23.48
215.00
173.00
1,139.27
462.16
E -21
Page 14
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
WASHINGTON (OASI), STATE OF
Public Works -Water
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
NCL NORTH CENTRAL LABORATORIES
NORTHERN SAFETY CO INC
ADS, LLC
ALDERGROVE CONSTRUCTION INC
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
CANON USA, INC
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FERRELLGAS INC
LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP
Larry Waldron
NCL NORTH CENTRAL LABORATORIES
NORTHERN SAFETY CO INC
Description
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
04 -28 a/c 271138138 -00005
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
1st Quarter Unemployment
Water
Public Works -Water
Water Fund
Excise Tax Return -March
CHEMICAL LAB EQUIP & SUPP
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP.
CONSULTING SERVICES
ROADSIDE,GRNDS,REC, PARK
PAINTS,COATINGS,WALLPAPER
OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -14 a/c 3604574859247B
04 -14 a/c 3604576315689B
04 -16 a/c 206T325585090B
04 -16 a/c 206T329544912B
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
Excise Tax Return -March
Shipping Chgs
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES
M ETALS, BARS, P LATES, RO DS
CDL LICENSE RENEWAL
CHEMICAL LAB EQUIP & SUPP
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP.
OLYMPIC PARTY & CUSTODIAL SUPPLIEFIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC SUPPLIES
PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY
PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC
SUNSET DO -IT BEST HARDWARE
Brooke Ave
Masters Rd
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP
SHIPPING AND HANDLING
POISONS AGRICUL & INDUSTR
PIPE FITTINGS
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS
SPRAYING EQUIPMENT
Account Number
402 - 7380 - 534.49 -90
402 - 7380 - 534.42 -10
402 - 7380 - 534.42 -10
402 - 7380 - 534.42 -10
402 - 7380 - 534.20 -60
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
403 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
403 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
403 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
Division Total:
Department Total:
403 - 7480 - 535.41 -50
403 - 7480 - 535.41 -50
403 - 7480 - 535.31 -20
403 - 7480 - 535.45 -31
403 - 7480 - 535.42 -12
403 - 7480 - 535.42 -12
403 - 7480 - 535.42 -10
403 - 7480 - 535.42 -10
403 - 7480 - 535.42 -10
403 - 7480 - 535.42 -10
403 - 7480 - 535.42 -10
403 - 7480 - 535.42 -10
403 - 7480 - 535.49 -50
403 - 7480 - 535.42 -10
403 - 7480 - 535.32 -12
403 - 7480 - 535.31 -20
403 - 7480 - 535.49 -90
403 - 7480 -535 31 -01
403 - 7480 - 535.31 -01
403 - 7480 - 535.31 -01
403 - 7480 - 535.31 -01
403 - 7480 - 535.47 -10
403 - 7480 - 535.47 -10
403 - 7480 - 535.31 -01
403 - 7480 - 535.42 -10
403 - 7480 - 535.31 -01
403 - 7480 - 535.31 -20
403 - 7480 - 535.31 -20
403 - 7480 - 535.35 -01
Invoice Amount
27.56
61.31
74.64
23.52
4,631.46
$31,442.80
$31,442.80
$31,642.69
167.22
-54.59
-33.69
$78.94
$78.94
4,868.97
339.29
54.69
174.64
1,459.48
1,459.48
84.58
84.70
54.40
54 40
16.27
22.20
12,758.83
120.34
569.08
3.34
85.00
704.40
434.70
211.38
19.77
190.95
445 72
459 17
20.25
133.17
18.94
15.86
56.34
E -22
Page 15
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
THURMAN SUPPLY
TYCO INTEGRATED SECURITY
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Public Works -WW /Storm%
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
A -1 PERFORMANCE, INC
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Public Works -Solid Waste
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
ACME SEPTIC PUMPING
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
HOLCOMB & COMPANY, D
April Amundson
Michelle Hale
RADIO PACIFIC INC (KONP)
SWAINS GENERAL STORE INC
WAK -IN MAN, INC
Description
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP
SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV
SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV
ENVIRONMENTAL &ECOLOGICAL
CITY BLACKBERRY BILL
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Wastewater
Public Works -WW /Stormwtr
Wastewater Fund
Excise Tax Return -March
BUILDING MAINT &REPAIR SER
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
Excise Tax Return -March
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Solid Waste- Collections
Public Works -Solid Waste
Solid Waste- Collections
Excise Tax Return -March
Excise Tax Return -March
RENTAULEASE EQUIPMENT
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
Excise Tax Return -March
Shipping Chgs
ROAD /HWY MAT NONASPHALTIC
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
COMMUNICATIONS /MEDIA SERV
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
ENVIRONMENTAL &ECOLOGICAL
Account Number
403 - 7480 - 535.31 -20
403 - 7480 -535 41 -50
403 - 7480 - 535.41 -50
403 - 7480 - 535.49 -90
403 - 7480 - 535.42 -10
403 - 7480 - 535.42 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
404 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
Division Total:
Department Total:
404 - 7580 - 537.41 -50
404 - 7580 - 537.42 -12
404 - 7580 - 537.42 -12
404 - 7580 - 537.42 -10
404 - 7580 - 537.42 -10
404 - 7580 - 537.49 -50
404 - 7580 - 537.31 -01
404 - 7580 - 537.31 -01
404 - 7580 - 537.42 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
405 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
405 - 0000 -237 10 -00
Division Total:
Department Total:
405 - 7538 - 537.48 -10
405 - 7538 - 537.42 -12
405 - 7538 - 537.42 -12
405 - 7538 - 537.42 -10
405 - 7538 - 537.42 -10
405 - 7538 - 537.49 -50
405 - 7538 -537 42 -10
405 - 7538 - 537.49 -90
405 - 7538 - 537.31 -01
405 - 7538 - 537.31 -01
405 - 7538 - 537.44 -10
405 - 7538 - 537.31 -20
405 - 7538 - 537.31 -20
405 - 7538 - 537.48 -10
Invoice Amount
46.59
55.65
704.55
27.56
115.16
12.24
$25,882.09
$25,882.09
$25,961.03
40.57
$40.57
$40.57
84.93
117.18
117.18
8.13
11.10
13,990.06
-1.13
15.17
4.79
$14,347.41
$14,347.41
$14,387.98
10.14
219.32
$229.46
$229.46
220.00
202.03
202 03
8.13
11.10
19,431.79
4.76
104.89
20.34
12.15
275.00
93.16
130.33
1,938.19
E -23
Page 16
City of Port
City Council Expe
From: 4/27/2013
Angeles
nditure Report
To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
WASHINGTON (OASI), STATE OF
Public Works -Solid Waste
ASPECT CONSULTING, LLC
WASHINGTON (OAST), STATE OF
Public Works -Solid Waste
ADVANCED TRAVEL
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
CLALLAM CNTY ROAD DEPT
EDGE ANALYTICAL
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Public Works- WW /Stormw
Description
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
1st Quarter Unemployment
SW - Transfer Station
CONSULTING SERVICES
CONSULTING SERVICES
1st Quarter Unemployment
Solid Waste- Landfill
Public Works -Solid Waste
Solid Waste- LF/Trf Stn
Paving Wkshop- Boehme
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
TESTING &CALIBRATION SERV!
TESTING &CALIBRATION SERVI
TESTING &CALIBRATION SERVI
Shipping Chgs
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES
04 -22 a/c 571136182 -00001
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Stormwater
Public Works -WW /Stormwtr
Stormwater Fund
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES Excise Tax Return -March
PROGRESSIVE MEDICAL INTERNATIONAI SALE SURPLUS /OBSOLETE
SALE SURPLUS /OBSOLETE
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
Natalie J Meacham RN CCRN
MOROZ, JAMES
OLYMPIC OXYGEN
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
ADV CARDIAC LIFE SUPPORT
EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
STEAM & HOT WATER BOILERS
PROGRESSIVE MEDICAL INTERNATIONAI SALE SURPLUS /OBSOLETE
SALE SURPLUS /OBSOLETE
SALE SURPLUS /OBSOLETE
REIFENSTAHL, PATRICIA EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
CPR CLASS 4/30/13
WASHINGTON ( DES/TBS), STATE OF RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Fire Department Medic I
Fire Department
Medic I Utility
ALL WEATHER HEATING & COOLING CITY REBATE
Account Number
405 - 7538 - 537.42 -10
405 - 7538 - 537.20 -60
Division Total:
405 - 7585 - 537.41 -50
405 - 7585 - 537.41 -50
405 - 7585 - 537.20 -60
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
406 - 7412- 538.43 -10
406 - 7412- 538.42 -10
406 - 7412- 538.42 -10
406 - 7412 - 538.41 -50
406 - 7412- 538.41 -50
406 - 7412- 538.41 -50
406 - 7412- 538.42 -10
406 - 7412- 538.49 -90
406 - 7412- 538.42 -10
406 - 7412- 538.42 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
409 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
409 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
409 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
Division Total:
Department Total:
409 - 6025 - 526.42 -10
409 - 6025 - 526.42 -10
409 - 6025 - 526.43 -10
409 - 6025 - 526.31 -08
409 - 6025 - 526.31 -13
409 - 6025 - 526.31 -02
409 - 6025 - 526.31 -02
409 - 6025 - 526.31 -13
409 - 6025 - 526.31 -08
409 - 6025 - 526.31 -08
409 - 6025 - 526.42 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
421- 7121 - 533.49 -86
Invoice Amount
4.05
1,088.94
$23,746.89
123.02
17,902.09
477.18
$18,502.29
$42,249.18
$42,478.64
196.43
4.07
5.55
1 ,780.13
248.21
54.00
9.52
27.55
19.22
19.54
$2,364.22
$2,364.22
$2,364.22
560.56
-24.99
-23.89
$511.68
$511.68
24.40
33.29
1,596.70
200.00
10.27
322.49
301.24
7.00
200.00
50.00
0.96
$2,746.35
$2,746.35
$3,258.03
500.00
E -24
Page 17
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor Description
ALL WEATHER HEATING & COOLING CITY REBATE
C & F INSULATION CITY REBATE
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
CASCADE ENERGY SERVICES CITY REBATE
CENTURYLINK -QWEST 04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
DAVE'S HEATING & COOLING SVC CITY REBATE
CITY REBATE
FLUID MARKET STRATEGIES CITY REBATE
GLASS SERVICES CO INC CITY REBATE
CITY REBATE
MATHEWS GLASS CO INC CITY REBATE
CITY REBATE
ADELE WILLIAMS -ROMAN CITY REBATE
DAN HILT CITY REBATE
FAITH SMITH CITY REBATE
JAMIE GORSS CITY REBATE
JENNIFER BROWN CITY REBATE
MARLESS BOSTON CITY REBATE
ROBERT HILL CITY REBATE
VERNON REIDEL CITY REBATE
ZACH ADDLEMAN CITY REBATE
RADIO PACIFIC INC (KONP) COMMUNICATIONS /MEDIA SERV
COMMUNICATIONS /MEDIA SERV
TRACY'S INSULATION CITY REBATE
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Public Works- Electric Conservation
Public Works- Electric
Conservation
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
Public Works- Electric Telecommunications
Public Works- Electric
Telecommunications Fund
COLUMBIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,GEN
VIRGINIA TRANSFORMERS CORP
WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC
Public Works- Electric
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
Electric Projects
Public Works - Electric
Account Number
421 - 7121- 533.49 -86
421 - 7121 - 533.49 -86
421- 7121- 533.42 -12
421 - 7121- 533.42 -12
421 - 7121- 533.49 -86
421 - 7121- 533.42 -10
421 - 7121- 533.42 -10
421 - 7121 - 533.49 -86
421 - 7121 - 533.49 -86
421 - 7121 - 533.49 -86
421 - 7121- 533.49 -86
421 - 7121 - 533.49 -86
421 - 7121- 533.49 -86
421 - 7121 - 533.49 -86
421 - 7121- 533.49 -86
421 - 7121 - 533.49 -86
421 - 7121 - 533.49 -86
421 - 7121 - 533.49 -86
421 - 7121 - 533.49 -86
421 - 7121 - 533.49 -86
421 - 7121- 533.49 -86
421 - 7121- 533.49 -86
421 - 7121 - 533.49 -86
421 - 7121 - 533.44 -10
421 - 7121 -533 44 -10
421- 7121- 533.49 -86
421 - 7121 -533 42 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
431 - 7130 - 538.41 -50
431 - 7130 - 538.41 -50
431 - 7130 -538 42 -12
431- 7130- 538.42 -12
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
451 - 7188 - 594.41 -50
451 - 7188- 594.65 -10
451 - 7188- 594.65 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
Invoice Amount
1,500.00
5,453.61
315.02
315.02
758.80
4.12
5.60
1,500.00
1,500.00
4,261.15
820.00
108.00
376.14
768.00
115.00
100.00
100.00
50.00
100.00
50.00
65.00
50.00
100.00
1,054.50
485.00
558.25
23.15
$21,036.36
$21,036.36
$21,036.36
2,365.26
2,365.26
5,282 03
5,282.03
$15,294.58
$15,294.58
$15,294.58
11,875 28
9,500.00
1,440.96
$22,816.24
$22,816.24
E -25
Page 18
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
HDR ENGINEERING, INC
Public Works -Water
BUILDERS EXCHANGE OF WA INC
CONLEY ENGINEERING, INC
SARGENT ENGINEERING, INC
Public Works -WW /Stormw
PACE ENGINEERS, INC
Public Works -Equip Svcs
BROWN AND CALDWELL
IMCO GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE (TEQ)
PEN PRINT INC
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Public Works -WW /Stormw
ALLDATA
BAXTER AUTO PARTS #15
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
FIRESTONE COMPLETE AUTO CARE
H & R PARTS & EQUIPMENT INC
KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES
MOTOR TRUCKS INC
NAPA AUTO PARTS
Description Account Number
Electric Utility CIP Fund Total:
CONSULTING SERVICES 452 -7388- 594.65 -10
Water Projects Division Total:
Public Works -Water Department Total:
Water Utility CIP
COMMUNICATIONS /MEDIA SERV
CONSULTING SERVICES
ENGINEERING SERVICES
Wastewater Projects
Public Works -WW /Stormwtr
WasteWater Utility CIP
CONSULTING SERVICES
Stormwater Util CIP Projs
Public Works -Equip Svcs
Stormwtr Util Projects
CONSULTING SERVICES
CONSULTING SERVICES
PW CONSTRUCTION & RELATED
CONSULTING SERVICES
ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT
SUPPLIES
CSO Capital
Public Works- WW /Stormwtr
CSO Capital Fund
RENTAULEASE EQUIPMENT
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
HOSES, ALL KINDS
Excise Tax Return -March
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK ACCESSORIES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
Fund Total:
453 - 7488 - 594.65 -10
453 - 7488 - 594.65 -10
453 - 7488 - 594.41 -50
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
456- 7688 - 594.41 -50
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
463- 7489 - 594.65 -10
463- 7489 - 594.65 -10
463- 7489 - 594.65 -10
463 - 7489 - 594.65 -10
463- 7489 - 594.65 -10
463- 7489 - 594.65 -10
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
501 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501- 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
Invoice Amount
$22,816.24
19,293.19
$19,293.19
$19,293.19
$19,293.19
45.00
7,846.71
111.00
$8,002.71
$8,002.71
$8,002.71
22, 591.75
$22,591.75
$22,591.75
$22,591.75
59,845.34
45,216.15
1,567,154.97
576.33
26.01
29.79
$1,672,848.59
$1,672,848.59
$1,672,848.59
-9.24
133.73
35.58
354.89
1,058 92
241.68
484.49
1,412.97
22.47
57.46
243.14
- 265.49
595 87
25.21
25.21
6.15
37.61
E -26
Page 19
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
NAPA AUTO PARTS
O'REILLY AUTO PARTS
PETTIT OIL COMPANY
PORT ANGELES TIRE FACTORY
SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DISTRIBUTING
SYSTEMS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY, INC
THURMAN SUPPLY
VALLEY FREIGHTLINER INC
VERSALIFT NORTHWEST, LLC
WESTERN FLUID COMPONENTS
A -1 PERFORMANCE, INC
ALLDATA
ALTEC INDUSTRIES, INC
ARAMARK
BAXTER AUTO PARTS #15
BRIM TRACTOR COMPANY INC
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
DAVE'S HEATING & COOLING SVC
H & R PARTS & EQUIPMENT INC
HEARTLINE
HUGHES FIRE EQUIPMENT INC
LEGACY TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC
LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER
Description
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK ACCESSORIES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK ACCESSORIES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
HOSES, ALL KINDS
BUILDING MAINT &REPAIR SER
RENTAULEASE EQUIPMENT
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
LAUNDRY /DRY CLEANING SERV
LAUNDRY /DRY CLEANING SERV
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP /SUP
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
Account Number
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.20 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501- 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 141.40 -00
501 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
501- 0000 - 141.40 -00
Division Total:
Department Total:
501 - 7630 - 548.41 -50
501 - 7630 - 548.48 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.49 -90
501 - 7630 - 548.49 -90
501 - 7630 - 548.35 -01
501- 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.42 -12
501- 7630 - 548.42 -12
501 - 7630 - 548.42 -10
501 - 7630 - 548.42 -10
501- 7630 - 548.35 -01
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501- 7630 -548 34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630- 548.34 -02
501- 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
Invoice Amount
7.52
15.14
35.89
7.48
13.98
12.96
5.41
111.76
259.64
100.55
887.96
975.55
189.37
43.36
5.96
96.39
156.07
-12.10
870.11
$8,243.65
$8,243.65
102.54
119.24
95.89
17.00
17 00
40.05
172.10
33.48
33 48
14.23
19.42
2,493.20
161 15
340 27
107.26
107 26
107.26
35.16
829.26
113.28
80 22
E -27
Page 20
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
MATCO TOOLS
N C MACHINERY CO
NAPA AUTO PARTS
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
OWEN EQUIPMENT
PETTIT OIL COMPANY
PORT ANGELES POWER EQUIPMENT
PORT ANGELES TIRE FACTORY
Description
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK ACCESSORIES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL
OFFICE SUPPLY,INKS,LEADS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
Account Number
501- 7630 - 548.35 -01
501 - 7630 - 548.35 -01
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501- 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.35 -01
501 - 7630 - 548.31 -01
501 - 7630 - 548.31 -01
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501- 7630- 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.32 -13
501 - 7630 - 548.32 -13
501- 7630 - 548.32 -13
501 - 7630 - 548.32 -13
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630- 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 -548 34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
Invoice Amount
39.10
83.47
23.48
24.59
477.01
115.57
85.91
12.91
60.84
4.85
193.73
26.15
45.19
- 847.48
1,127.56
648.31
232.75
554.63
167.48
2,283.20
259.34
6.40
127.86
4.12
82.38
4.09
81.79
18.81
193.49
15.68
58.47
4.12
82.38
4.12
82.38
17.07
101.25
144.75
73.71
96.48
110.57
218.65
E - 28
Page 21
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
PORT ANGELES TIRE FACTORY
PRICE FORD LINCOLN
RICHMOND 2 -WAY RADIO
RUDDELL AUTO MALL
RUDY'S AUTOMOTIVE
SUNSET DO -IT BEST HARDWARE
VALIN COPORATION
VALLEY FREIGHTLINER INC
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
WCIA (WA CITIES INS AUTHORITY)
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CO
Public Works -Equip Svcs
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
AVAYA, INC
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
NORTHPOINT CONSULTING INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
Description
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
BELTS AND BELTING
RENTAL/LEASE EQUIPMENT
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
04 -22 a/c 571136182 -00003
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
INSURANCE, ALL TYPES
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV
Equipment Services
Public Works -Equip Svcs
Equipment Services
Excise Tax Return -March
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -23 NC 206T302306084B
04 -23 NC 206T310164584B
COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC.
N5K LICENSE REQ'S REVIEW
Account Number
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630- 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501- 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630- 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501- 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630- 548.34 -02
501 - 7630- 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.45 -30
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501- 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.34 -02
501 - 7630 - 548.42 -10
501 - 7630 - 548.42 -10
501 - 7630 - 548.49 -90
501 - 7630 - 548.49 -90
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
502 - 0000 - 237.00 -00
Division Total:
Department Total:
502 - 2081 - 518.48 -02
502 - 2081 - 518.42 -12
502 - 2081 - 518.42 -12
502 - 2081 -518 42 -10
502 - 2081 -518 42 -10
502- 2081 - 518.48 -02
502- 2081 - 518.41 -50
COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPF 502-2081-518 31 -01
Invoice Amount
255.23
103.61
136.59
47.97
83.96
4.15
82.93
17.44
399.82
2,254.72
30.80
34.36
10 41
165.49
280.23
47.17
300.49
112.90
164.29
82.24
53.12
387.57
105.27
45.25
25.16
9.51
1,969.00
60.54
$19,456.13
$19,456.13
$27,699.78
- 476.18
- $476.18
- $476.18
16, 706.44
100.00
100 00
18.30
24.97
964.76
92.50
82.47
E -29
Page 22
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR
WASHINGTON ( DES/TBS), STATE OF
Finance Department
NORDISK SYSTEMS, INC
VP CONSULTING INC
Finance Department
AWC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST
NW ADMIN TRANSFER ACCT
Self Insurance
DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES
Self Insurance
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DES/TBS), STATE OF
Economic Development
AWC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST
Fireman's Pension
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE -WIRES
PA DOWNTOWN ASSN
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
Description Account Number
QREP 120649 MAINTENANCE 502 - 2081 - 518.48 -02
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION 502 - 2081 - 518.42 -10
Information Technologies Division Total:
COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC. 502 - 2082 - 594.65 -10
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE 502- 2082 - 594.65 -10
COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC. 502- 2082 - 594.65 -10
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE 502 - 2082 - 594.65 -10
IT Capital Projects Division Total:
Finance Department Department Total:
Information Technology Fund Total:
Med.Den/Vis Premiums 503 - 1631 - 517.46 -30
LT Disability 503 - 1631 - 517.46 -31
Life Insurance 503 - 1631 - 517.46 -32
L1 MedNis Premiums 503 - 1631 - 517.46 -34
S /NS/WT 503 - 1631- 517.46 -33
RETIREES 503- 1631- 517.46 -34
Other Insurance Programs Division Total:
L &I 1ST QUARTER REPORT 503 - 1661 - 517.49 -50
Worker's Compensation Division Total:
Self Insurance Department Total:
Self - Insurance Fund Fund Total:
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B 504 - 1512- 558.42 -10
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B 504 -1512- 558.42 -10
04 -15 a/c 264230412 -00003 504 - 1512 - 558.42 -10
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION 504 - 1512 - 558.42 -10
Archaeologist Division Total:
Economic Development Department Total:
Cultural Resources Fund Total:
Retiree Premiums 602- 6221 - 517.46 -35
Fireman's Pension Division Total:
Fireman's Pension Department Total:
Firemen's Pension Fund Total:
Excise Tax Return -March 650 - 0000 - 231.91 -00
Excise Tax Return -March 650 - 0000 - 237.10 -00
APR 2013 DECAL SALES 650- 0000 - 231.91 -00
APR 2013 PBIA DUES 650- 0000 - 231.92 -00
APR 2013 1ST STREET PLAZA 650- 0000 - 231.93 -00
Division Total:
Department Total:
Off Street Parking Fund Fund Total:
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE 652 - 8630 -575 42 -12
Invoice Amount
54.20
13.12
$18,156.76
27,100.00
15,024.24
46,330.16
11,926.17
$100,380.57
$118,537.33
$118,061.15
250,078.16
4,101.61
1,669.61
10,873.39
73,132.75
9,019 00
$348,874.52
28,558.90
$28,558.90
$377,433.42
$377,433.42
2.03
2.77
36.25
0.44
$41.49
$41.49
$41.49
4,011.32
$4,011.32
$4,011.32
$4,011.32
-4 66
87.65
86.68
3,436.24
4,091.16
$7,697.07
$7,697.07
$7,697.07
202.03
E -30
Page 23
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013
Date 5/16/2013
Vendor
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CENTURYLINK -QWEST
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
Description
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE
04 -23 A/C 206T418577331B
04 -23 A/C 206T302306084B
04 -23 A/C 206T310164584B
OFFICE MACHINES & ACCESS
PORT ANGELES FINE ARTS CENTER FNC PRINTING,SILK SCR,TYPSET
Esther Webster /Fine Arts Esther Webster /Fine Arts
Esther Webster /Fine Arts
Esther Webster Fund
AFSCME LOCAL 1619 P/R Deductions pe 04 -28
P/R Deductions pe 04 -28
PAYROLL SUMMARY
PAYROLL SUMMARY
PAYROLL SUMMARY
PAYROLL SUMMARY
P/R Deductions pe 04 -28
P/R Deductions pe 04 -28
P/R Deductions pe 04 -28
P/R Deductions pe 04 -28
P/R Deductions pe 04 -28
P/R Deductions pe 04 -28
PAYROLL SUMMARY
09 -2- 012494 -9
PAYROLL SUMMARY
P/R Deductions pe 04 -28
BROWN & BROWN OF WASHINGTON
FIREFIGHTER'S LOCAL 656
GUARANTEED EDUCATION TUITION
IBEW LOCAL 997
LEOFF
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
PERS
POLICE ASSOCIATION
SUTTELL & HAMMER, PS
UNITED WAY (PAYROLL)
WSCCCE AFSCME AFL -CIO
Totals for check period
Payroll Clearing
Account Number
652 - 8630 - 575.42 -12
652 - 8630 - 575.42 -10
652- 8630 -575 42 -10
652- 8630 - 575.42 -10
652 - 8630 - 575.45 -31
652 - 8630 - 575.49 -60
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
920 - 0000 - 231.54 -40
920 - 0000 - 231.54 -40
920 - 0000 - 231.53 -40
920 - 0000 - 231.54 -30
920 - 0000 - 231.56 -95
920 - 0000 - 231.54 -20
920 - 0000 - 231.51 -21
920 - 0000 - 231.56 -20
920 - 0000 - 231.56 -20
920 - 0000 - 231.51 -10
920 - 0000 - 231.51 -11
920 - 0000 - 231.51 -12
920 - 0000 - 231.55 -10
920 - 0000 - 231.56 -90
920 - 0000 - 231.56 -10
920 - 0000 - 231.54 -40
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
Invoice Amount
202.03
57.46
6.10
8.32
8.82
263.96
$748.72
$748.72
$748.72
105.00
210.00
1,375.39
1,701.00
263.50
1,300.96
23,466.60
670.09
169.85
1,712.10
10, 955.39
41,129 02
436.00
204.08
598.46
4,074.37
$88,371.81
$88,371.81
$88,371.81
From. 4/27/2013 To: 5/10/2013 $2,953,571.12
E -31
Page 24
PORT NGELES
WASHINGTON, U. S. A
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: May 21, 2013
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Glenn A. Cutler, P.E., Public Works and Utilities Director
SUBJECT: Resolution Setting Public Hearing on 2013 -2019 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) & Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Summary: It is necessary to conduct a public hearing prior to adopting the Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP).
Recommendation: Pass the attached resolution setting a public hearing for June 4, 2013 to
accept public comment on the City's 2013 -2019 Transportation Improvement Program and
the 2013 -2019 Capital Facilities Plan.
Background /Analysis: The State requires the City to set a public hearing by resolution to accept
input for our six -year TIP. It is noted that the six -year TIP is included as the transportation
element of the six -year CFP.
Staff will provide a presentation at the June 4, 2013 City Council meeting addressing the 2013-
2019 TIP & CFP prior to the public hearing. It is proposed to continue the public hearing to June
18, 2013. At this Council meeting, additional input will be taken and the hearing closed.
Following Council discussion, the CFP /TIP may be adopted.
It is recommended that Council pass the attached resolution setting a public hearing for June 4,
2013 to accept public comment on the City's 2013 -2019 Transportation Improvement Program and
the 2013 -2019 Capital Facilities Plan.
Attachment: Resolution
N \CCOUNCIL \FINAL \Resolution Setting Public Hearing for TIP -CIP 052113.docx
E -32
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
setting a public hearing date of June 4, 2013 for review of the Six -year
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the Capital Facilities Plan
(CFP) for the years 2013 -2019.
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.77.010, the City of Port Angeles is required to
review its TIP annually; and
WHEREAS, the CFP may be revised once a year in accordance with the State's
Growth Management Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council will hold a public
hearing on the proposed six -year TIP and on its CFP for 2013 -2019 on the 4th day of June, 2013,
commencing at 6:30 p.m. or soon thereafter, at 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, Washington.
All written and oral comments on the proposed TIP and CFP will be considered.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 21st day of May, 2013.
Cherie Kidd, Mayor
ATTEST:
Janessa Hurd, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
G \LEGAL \a ORDINANCES &RESOLUTIONS\RESOLUTIONS 2013 \05 - TIP &CFP- Hcarmg 05 13 13 wpd
CITY OF
p:ORTANGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY C OUNCIL M EMO
DATE: MAY 21, 2013
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: WILLIAM BLOOR, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
Subject: Renewal of Lease for Puget Sound Pilots on Ediz Hook
SUMMARY: The Puget Sound Pilots exercised their option to renew their lease for an additional eight
years. As part of that renewal, they requested an additional 8 year renewal option. In exchange for the
additional option, they agreed to pay a base rate of $1000 towards the rip rap nourishment on Ediz Hook.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Lease Amendment and authorize the City Manager to sign the
Amendment, making minor modifications, if necessary.
DISCUSSION: The Puget Sounds Pilots lease a small parcel of land for parking and storage on Ediz Hook
near the US Coast Guard Base adjacent to their operations. They pay $300 a year plus leasehold excise tax
and assist in the maintenance of the rip rap. They have leased this land since 1995.
The attached amendment extends the lease the additional eight years per the option in the prior lease and
adds an additional eight year option. Also, it increases the Pilot's contribution towards rip rap maintenance
to a $1000 base rate plus a pro rata share (approximately 1.4 %) of the costs. The base rate plus the pro rata
share are to be paid only in those years the City actively incurs costs for rip rap repair. Previously, the lease
required the Pilot's to pay only a pro rata share. All other terms of the lease remain the same as the previous
lease. The Real Estate Committee of the City Council recommended approval this action on April 1, 2013.
William E. Bloor
City Attorney
G \LEGAL \a MEMOS\MEMOS 2013 \Council Pilot'sleaserenewal 5 21 13 wpd
Second Amendment to Lease Agreement
Between
City of Port Angeles
and
Puget Sound Pilots
This is the second, amendment to the Lease Agreement dated January 1, 1995 ( "Lease ") by
and between the City of Port Angeles ( "City") and Puget Sound Pilots ( "Pilots ");
WHEREAS, the First Amendment to the Lease provided the Pilots with an option to renew
the Lease for an additional term -of eight (8) years; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Lease to extend the term as provided in the First
Amendment to the Lease;
WIIEREFORE, theparties in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, hereby,
agree as follows:
1. The provisions in Section 2 of the Lease shall be replaced with the following language:
This Lease which commenced on the first day of January, 1995, will terminate at
midnight June 3, 2021, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the terms hereof.
Subject to all of the conditions, restrictions, provisions and renewal of the underlying
lease from the United States of America to the City of Port Angeles dated August 17, 1914,
and all conditions, provisions, and restriction of any succeeding leases, the Pilots shall have
the option to renew this lease for an additional terra of eight (8) years.
.2. The provisions in Section 6 of the lease shall bereplaced with the following language:
The Pilots agree to pay the City during the term of this Lease the annual sum of
$300.00 plus Department of Revenue leasehold tax (taxes currently 12.84 %) as minimtun
rent, payable in advance on the 15111 day of January of each year; provided, however, that the
minimum rent set forth shall be increased yearly to reflect the increase, if any, in the cost of
living as indicated by the Consumer Price Index for Puget Sound or regional index as
published by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics (the "Index "). Any
adjustment of minium rent shall become effective immediately. If the Index is discontinued
the City shall substitute a similar index of consumer prices.
In addition to the annual rental, Pilots shall reimburse the City for its proportionate
share of rip rap nourishment costs assessed bythe Corp of Engineers. Pilots proportionate
share shall be determined by dividing the length of Pilots' leasehold (150 feet) by the total
Linear lease footage (10,800 feet) which equals .0138; times the amount assessed to the City
plus a $1000 base rate. The rip rap nourishment is performed approximately every five (5)
years. Said amount shall becoine due and payable upon billing by the City,
E -35
3. Except as expressly provided
Amendment are hereby ratified
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
dated below:
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
By:
Its:
above, the 1995 Lease Agreement and the 2002 First
and confirmed.
parties hereto have executed this instrument as signed and
Date:
PUG SOUND PILOTS
Date:
G:kLEGAL\n REAL ESTATEIPUGET PTLOTS12nd .AmendmenLPuget.Pilots.33.13 wpd
G:\LEGAL\a REAL ESTATE\PUGET PILOTS\ 2nd. Amendment .Puget.Pilots.3.5.13.wpd
E -36
LESSOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF CLALLAM )
)
On this day of , 2013, before me a Notary Public in and for the State of
, personally appeared , personally
known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who executed this
instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the
of the City of Port Angeles, to be the free and voluntary act and
deed of said party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above
written.
STATE OF 1N A s N tiv G77- mi"
County of /Ct a/ -
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington
residing at
My appointment expires
Print Name
LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
)
)
)
)
SS.
On this act— day of 4PRi L , 2013, before me a Notary Public in and for the State of
, personally appeared Oigh-ip+t, WART, an-d
known to me proved tp me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the
pers ' Je,a. ..._.r. ` IreSt Pespectivety; of the Puget Sound
Pilots, the :..`s • I. t executed the within and i in o
fore g g stru t and acknowledged said instrument
to the free and voluntary act and deed of said ata the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrumentran d
WAsr+w__7 N
written.
n.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above
;,t
CIA
iV .Oit,� .p •
��s, "*Lt0 r'
//, O,c''�n ,15�a•A
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of W A Sti tNGTc3,t!
residing at / e NT-o N, W A
My appointment expires o y /�71
Print Name PA-TR +ct+4 e'"7. M6oR.E.
E -37
PORTANGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: MAY 21, 2013
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: TERRY GALLAGHER, POLICE CHIEF
KEN DUBUC, FIRE CHIEF
SUBJECT: OPSCAN SERVICES / CLALLAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE - INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT
Summary: The Port Angeles Police and Fire Departments utilize the services of the Olympic
Public Safety Communications Alliance Network (OPSCAN), which is an interoperable
communications network across Clallam County. The OPSCAN system is administered by the
Clallam County Sheriff's Office, and that office is obtaining Interlocal agreements with OPSCAN
user agencies in order to memorialize the use of OPSCAN and the payment for that use. The
attached agreement stipulates the services provided as well as the charges for those services.
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to sign an interlocal agreement with the Clallam
County Sheriff's Office for OPSCAN services.
Background / Analysis: The Olympic Public Safety Communications Alliance Network
(OPSCAN) is an interoperable communications network across Clallam County. The system
was developed utilizing a $5.8 million Department of Homeland Security grant to install a
microwave backbone and a network of interoperable gateways. OPSCAN improves radio
coverage throughout the County while creating a seamless, coordinated, and integrated public
safety communications system for the safe, effective, and efficient protection of life and property.
The OPSCAN system is administered by the Clallam County Sheriff's Office. The Port Angeles
Police and Fire Departments are both connected to the OPSCAN network and use it for their daily
communications. The network has proven to be very reliable and effective.
The Clallam County Sheriff's Office is obtaining Interlocal agreements with OPSCAN user
agencies in order to memorialize the use of OPSCAN and the payment for that use. The attached
agreement stipulates the services provided as well as the charges for those services. The 2013
OPSCAN operating charges for the Port Angeles Police Department will be $12,910 and charges for
the Fire Department will be $4307. These amounts are included in the 2013 budget.
The attached agreement has been reviewed and approved by the Port Angeles Legal Department. It
is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the attached interlocal
agreement with the Clallam County Sheriff's Office for OPSCAN services.
E -38
AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
and
CLALLAM COUNTY
RELATING TO USE OF THE OLYMPIC PUBLIC SAFETY ALLIANCE NETWORK (OPSCAN)
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 2013, by and between the City of
Port Angeles, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as "City ") and
Clallam County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as "County ").
THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT IS TO memorialize the use of the OPSCAN network and
payment for such use.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT:
SCOPE OF WORK
The County Sheriffs Office, as administrator for the OPSCAN network as described in Attachment "A ",
will provide OPSCAN connectivity in exchange for an annual fee.
INDEMNIFICATION
Each party will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other for liability stemming from its own
intentional and /or negligent acts and/or omissions, but not those of the other, or based on claims arising out
of the terms of this agreement.
DURATION
This agreement will remain in effect until terminated in writing by either party.
CONTACT PERSONS
The City and the County will each appoint a representative who will be responsible for the administration
of this Agreement. Unless otherwise designated in writing, the City's contact person will be the Chief of
Police or designee. The County contact person will be the Undersheriff.
COMPENSATION
The amount of payment each year per the City's use as described in Attachment B. The County will not be
obligated to perform services, for which timely payment is not received.
The Sheriffs Office will submit an annual invoice to the City of Port Angeles for the services outlined in
Attachment B of this Agreement.
The Sheriff's Office will maintain a cost center to provide for Network as well as any sub -net
service accountability. Draft annual budgets for the Network and each authorized sub -net service
will be published prior to July 1 of each year. Final budgets will be published by September 15
of each year. A spreadsheet apportionment of all budgeted expenditures will be circulated to all
participating OPSCAN users, and will thus establish each OPSCAN user's cost share for the
following calendar year. The Network budget will include all costs required to adequately
maintain the contract.
E -39
AGREEMENT ALTERATIONS AND AMENDMENTS
The City and the County may mutually amend this agreement, Such amendments shall not be binding
unless they are in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind the City and the County.
TERMINATION
Except as otherwise provided for in this agreement, either party may terminate this agreement upon thirty
(30) days written notice. If this agreement is so terminated, the terminating party shall be liable only for
performance rendered or costs incurred in accordance with the terms of this agreement prior to the
effective date of termination. In the event of termination, the parties agree that any property acquired in
connection with this agreement shall remain the property of the party who purchased the property,
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
In the event that a dispute arises under this agreement, it shall be determined in the following manner:
The City shall appoint a member to the Dispute Board. The County will appoint a member to the Dispute
Board. The City and the County will jointly appoint a member to the Dispute Board. In the event the City
and County are not able to jointly agree -on a third member to serve on the Dispute Board, either party may
petition the Superior Court for Clallam County to appoint a third member to the Dispute Board. The
Dispute Board shall evaluate and adjudicate the dispute. The determination of the Dispute Board shall be
final and binding on the parties hereto.
COMPLETE EXPRESSION
This agreement, and any written attachments or amendments thereto, including "Attachment A ",
constitute the complete agreement of the parties and any oral representations or understandings not
incorporated herein are excluded.
ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Port Angeles and Clallam County have signed this agreement as of
the date and year written below.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES CLALLAM COUNTY
Dan McKeen, City Manager
Date
Approved as to Form
Title:
Date:
William Bloor, City Attorney Clallam County Prosecuting Attorney
Attachment A
The Olympic Public Safety Communications Alliance Network (OPSCAN) improves
communication connectivity, coverage and interoperability among public safety and other entities
that operate on the Olympic Peninsula in Washington State. OPSCAN has built and maintains an
interoperable, state -of -the -art communications network across Clallam County consisting of a
microwave backbone, a network of interoperability gateways, and solutions, and development of
policies, procedures, and training to ensure proper functionality and operations.
OPSCAN creates a seamless, coordinated, and integrated public safety communications system
for the safe effective, and efficient protection of life and property while improving radio coverage.
Port Angeles Fire Department as well as the City of Port Angeles Police Department are
connected to the OPSCAN network and use it for their communications.
Attachment B
OPSCAN Network User Inter -Local Agreement
Clallam County Sheriffs Office (Network Host) and
The City of Port Angeles Police and Fire Departments (Network User agency)
1. This Service Supplement:
X replaces all previous supplements
is a modification of, or addition to, previous supplements numbered
in effect.
which remain
2. Network User Agency Emergency contact(s) for reports of service - affecting nature:
Name: E -mail: Phone: Cell:
3. List of OPSCAN Network Resources assigned to User Agency (subject to rate changes
described in annual declaration):
Port Angeles Fire Department
Charges for this user agency for calendar year 2013 are: $4307
4. List of OPSCAN sub -net Services subscribed to by Network User agency
a. X_ Law Enforcement Dispatch Radio Network (LEDRN). The LEDRN is a separate
cost - center calculation which subscribes to OPSCAN circuits and maintenance on
behalf of all LEDRN User agencies, and distributes the costs thereof to LEDRN
participants in accordance with a formula determined by the LEDRN user group.
Charges for this user agency for calendar year 2013 are: $12,910.
b. No Optional Preventive Maintenance program equipment. User agency elects to
participate in an optional program for preventive and emergency response
maintenance service for agency -owned fixed radio equipment along with coverage
provided by OPSCAN for the network equipment.
The list of covered equipment and charges is:
c. X_ OPSCAN Management Technical Consult services. These services are available
to assist Network User Agency in design of agency's owned radio systems to operate
OPSCAN Inter -Local Agreement — Service Supplement No. 1 to contract 11065- 13 -06, PAFD /FD2
E - 42
in conjunction with OPSCAN Network Services, or other radio - related technical
consulting projects, as defined by following, or emails exchanged between
authorized parties (2013 rate, $55.00 /hour, adjusted annually):
Assistance in design of systems and procurement documents for
development of a simulcast Fire Dispatch Network in the areas serving both
Fire Districts. See item d., below re charges.
d. Description of non - standard or reciprocity arrangements between OPSCAN and
Network User:
CCSO consulting services for design of a multi -site simulcast / voted system for
PAFD /FD2 will be waived, in return for endorsement letter to FCC for CCSO to
license the UHF frequency pair 453.100 / 458.100 MHz, currently licensed to
Port Angeles Fire Dept., for law enforcement repeaters in Clallam County.
Execution:
OPSCAN Owner, CCSO Network User: CITY of Port Angeles
Signature Signature
Name Name
Title Title
OPSCAN Inter -Local Agreement — Service Supplement No. 1 to contract 11065- 13 -06, PAFD /FD2
E - 43
CITY OF
• 16;4211
PORT NGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: May 21, 2013
To: City Council
From: William Bloor, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Agreement for Prisoner Confinement Services with the City of Forks
SUMMARY: In order to house City of Port Angeles prisoners in the Forks city jail, it is necessary
to enter into a contract between the City of Port Angeles and the City of Forks. The City of Forks
provided the attached Agreement for Continued Prisoner Confinement Services with yearly cost
adjustments based upon the consumer price index.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Agreement for Prisoner Confinement Services with the City of
Forks and authorize the Mayor to sign it.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The City of Port Angeles has contracted with the City of Forks for prisoner confinement services at
the Forks jail since 1998. Forks is willing to accept Port Angeles prisoners at the set rate of $45.00
per day with a special rate of $40.00 per day for a court commitment of 365 days. It is in the City's
best interest to have the option of alternatives for incarceration available.
The proposed contract provides for annual adjustment of the daily fee based upon Seattle Consumer
Price Cost Index. The trigger date for adjustment is June 1, 2014 and each year thereafter.
Continuation of the Prisoner Confinement Services Contract with the City of Forks under the
proposed contract remains a beneficial option for the City of Port Angeles.
G.\LEGAL\a MEMOS\MEMOS 2013\Coucil Forks]a11052113 wpd
CITY OF FORKS
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PRISONER CONFINEMENT SERVICES
This Agreement is made and entered into this 1st day of JUNE, 2013, by and between the
CITY OF FORKS, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "FORKS "), and the CITY OF PORT
ANGELES, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY ").
REPRESENTATIONS:
1. Pursuant to Chapters 39.34 and 70.48 RCW, FORKS and CITY may enter into an
agreement, through their respective legislative bodies, whereby FORKS shall furnish
jail facilities for CITY prisoners upon such terms as may be mutually agreed upon.
2. Chapter 39.34 RCW specifies that cities are responsible for the incarceration of
misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor offenses committed by adults in their
respective jurisdictions, and referred from their respective law enforcement agencies,
whether filed under state law or city ordinance, and must carry out this responsibility
through the use of their own courts, staff, and facilities, or by entering into contracts or
interlocal agreements to provide these services. Such contracts or interlocal
agreements are required to take into account the anticipated costs of services as well
as the anticipated and potential revenues to fund the services, including fines and
fees, criminal justice funding, and state authorized sales tax funding levied for criminal
justice purposes.
3. CITY and FORKS agree that the terms and conditions set forth herein are an
acceptable basis for FORKS providing prisoner jail services to CITY for persons
committing misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor offenses within CITY limits.
AGREEMENTS:
1. Availability and Funding of Adult Correctional Facilities and Services: FORKS agrees
to house, care for, and provide for the welfare and safekeeping of CITY prisoners
within its facilities. In so doing, FORKS agrees to furnish its facilities and personnel
for the confinement, processing, and related services for CITY prisoners in the same
manner and to the same extent as FORKS furnishes said services for confinement,
processing, and related activities of its own prisoners. FORKS jail facilities shall be
made available and furnished for holding of CITY prisoners serving imposed jail terms,
subject to the conditions herein. Said facilities and services shall meet the
requirements of all applicable state and federal laws.
2. Definition of a CITY Prisoner: The term "CITY prisoner" as used in this Agreement
shall mean a person arrested by CITY police and held and confined in the FORKS
Jail, or otherwise held in detention as provided in this agreement, pursuant to a
violation of a CITY ordinance or a violation of a state law which designates the crime
E -45
for which the person is held to be a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor. The term
"CITY prisoner" shall not include a person arrested for a felony offense by CITY
police, a person arrested on a warrant issued by another jurisdiction or for charges
initiated by a non CITY officer, or a person charged by the prosecutor with a felony or
an attempt to commit a felony even if there is a plea to or conviction of a lessor
offense.
3. Prisoner Confinement Daily Fee:
A. Beginning 1 June 2013, CITY agrees to pay FORKS a daily per inmate fee for the
housing of prisoners in the FORKS Jail. The daily confinement fee shall be
charged per prisoner for each calendar day or portion thereof, excluding the release
day when a prisoner has been confined for more than one day. The base daily rate
shall be $45.00 each on a daily basis, FORKS will house any CITY prisoner who
has a court commitment of 365 days at the special daily rate of $40.00 each day.
B. This rate shall be adjusted annually, based on the Seattle CPI U. The first annual
adjustment will be effective JUNE1, 2014 and each year thereafter.
C. Prisoner fees shall be billed by FORKS each month and CITY shall pay said fees
within 30 days of billing. In the event of an error, the next billing after the error was
discovered, it will be adjusted appropriately.
4. Partial Confinement and Alternative Confinement Programs: CITY prisoners shall be
considered for FORKS alternative and partial confinement programs on an equal basis
with FORKS prisoners, and subject to the same rules and regulations, as well as potential
sanctions, for program rule violations. Prisoner participation in such programs may be
limited to an operational capacity as identified by FORKS. Alternative and partial
confinement programs shall include, but not be limited to, Work Release and Work Crew.
It is understood by the parties that the term alternative confinement programs shall not
include electronic home monitoring.
The City of Forks Jail, in cooperation with Peninsula Community College, offers a GED
program to those inmates wishing to genuinely earn their GED.
Where offenders pay a fee to FORKS for program participation, such fees shall be
deducted from the confinement daily fee.
Where CITY prisoners are in a FORKS Work Crew assignment, they shall be credited with
ten days "good time" for each 30 days that they are assigned to the Work Crew. If the
prisoner is not on a work crew or special program that prisoner is eligible for five days good time
per thirty days served. "Good time" is earned, and not automatically "given ", once housed in
Forks.
-2-
E - 46
5. Designated Administrators: The FORKS Police Chief in consultation with the CITY
Attorney or his or her designee shall administer this agreement. Each administrator or
designee may consult with each other quarterly regarding costs, fees and charges and
regarding changes in policies, practices, or procedures, which may affect the
responsibilities of the other, and will try to resolve disputes between themselves or
through their designated representatives.
6. Medical Costs: Medical costs for emergency or necessary health care for CITY
prisoners shall be the responsibility of CITY. CITY retains the option to contract with
medical providers to provide medical services to CITY prisoners. FORKS will not
transport outside of FORKS city limits for medical appointments, this will be borne by
CITY if such a medical transport is necessary.
FORKS shall notify CITY prior to outside medical care being provided for a CITY
prisoner; provided, however, that when emergency medical care is required in life -
threatening circumstances, the notification may occur as soon as practicable.
No Waiver of Right to Seek Reimbursement. The above paragraphs relating to
medical costs are intended solely to define the obligations between the parties to this
agreement. Nothing contained within the provisions of this agreement shall be
construed to waive the rights of either party to seek reimbursement for costs from the
department of social and health services, or from the prisoner, or any other
responsible third -party.
7. Transportation: Transportation of CITY prisoners to the FORKS jail facilities will be
provided by the FORKS Police Department as needed, but not to exceed one time per
calendar week. FORKS Police Department, will travel to a mutually agreed upon
location for the pick -up. The one -way rate for transportation shall be included in the
daily prisoner rate. Upon release of CITY prisoners, FORKS may transport the
prisoner to the Forks Transit Center. A one -way ticket toward the CITY area may be
issued to the released prisoner. If the prisoner is needed for Court during
incarceration in the FORKS jail, it will be the responsibility of CITY to transport the
prisoner from FORKS jail to Court, and return.
8. Transfer of Custody: When the CITY law enforcement officers are placing arrested
persons in custody of FORKS, at a designated meet point between the parties or at
the Forks jail, the City officer shall be required to remain in the immediate presence of
the arrested person and shall be considered to have such person in their sole custody
until the FORKS booking officer audibly states that the prisoner is secured; at such
time and only then, will FORKS come into custody of said prisoner.
When custody of a CITY prisoner is transferred to FORKS, the CITY prisoner shall be
subject to all applicable rules, regulations and standards governing operation of the
FORKS jail, including any emergency security rules imposed by the FORKS Chief of
-3-
E -47
Police or designee. Any CITY police officer delivering a prisoner to FORKS jail shall
comply with reasonable rules and regulations of the FORKS jail.
9. Release of CITY Prisoner from FORKS Jail: No CITY prisoner confined in the FORKS
jail subject to this agreement shall be released except: (a) when requested by a
member of CITY Police Department; (b) in compliance with orders of the court in
those matters in which the courts have jurisdiction; (c) for appearance in court; (d) for
interviews by CITY police or attorneys; (e) if the prisoner has served his or her
sentence or the charge pending against said prisoner has been dismissed; or (f) as
determined by the FORKS Chief of Police as part of a plan to reduce prisoner
population as a result of facility overcrowding.
10. Record Keeping:
FORKS agrees to maintain a system of record keeping relative to the booking and
confinement of each CITY prisoner in such style and manner as equivalent to
FORKS's records pertaining to its own prisoners. FORKS shall make available, upon
request, to CITY or its authorized representatives, copies of said records.
11. CITY Access to Prisoners: All CITY police officers, investigators and the prisoner's
legal counsel shall have the right to interview the prisoners at any time inside the
confines of the FORKS jail, subject only to necessary security rules. Interview rooms
will be made available to CITY police officers in equal priority with those of any other
department.
12. Equal Treatment of CITY Prisoners: CITY and FORKS prisoners will be treated
equally for purposes of extradition, transportation, record keeping, and access to
special detention programs. During situations where jail population exceeds
maximum capacity, FORKS retains priority for the housing of FORKS prisoners.
FORKS will notify CITY if prisoner(s) are to be released due to situations where jail
population exceeds maximum capacity and give CITY an opportunity to transport
prisoner to another jail facility. When known, FORKS will notify CITY if the jail
population exceeds maximum capacity prior to the transportation of new prisoners to
the facility pursuant to paragraph 7 above.
13. Hold Harmless Agreement.
A. FORKS assumes full responsibility for the welfare, safety and safekeeping of
all CITY prisoners while in the custody of FORKS. FORKS agrees to hold
harmless, indemnify, and defend CITY its elected officials, officers,
employees and agents from and against any and all suits, actions, claims,
liability, damages, judgments, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys' fees) (also including but not limited to claims related to alleged
mistreatment, injury, or death to any prisoner, or loss or damage to prisoner
property while in FORKS' custody) which result from or arise out of the
-4-
E - 48
negligence of FORKS, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents
in connection with or incidental to the performance or non - performance of
FORKS' services, duties and obligations under this Agreement.
B. The CITY agrees to hold harmless, indemnify, and defend FORKS its
elected officials, officers, employees and agents from and against any and
all suits, actions, claims, liability, damages, judgments, costs and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys' fees) (also including but not limited to a
claim of false arrest, unlawful imprisonment and writs of habeas corpus
proceedings) which result from or arise out of the negligence of CITY, its
elected officials, officers, employees, and agents in connection with or
incidental to the performance or non - performance of CITY's services, duties
and obligations under this Agreement.
C. In the event that the officials, officers, agents, and /or employees of both
FORKS and the CITY are concurrently negligent, each party shall be liable
for its contributory share of negligence for any resulting suits, actions, claims,
liability, damages, judgments, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys' fees).
D. Nothing contained in this section of this Agreement shall be construed to
create a liability or a right of indemnification by any third party.
E. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of
this Agreement with respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or
termination.
14. Duration of Agreement: Subject to the provisions of RCW 39.34.040, this Agreement
shall be effective on 1 June 2013, and said Agreement shall be in effect for a period of
three years. This Agreement will be renegotiated every three years. The Agreement
may be terminated upon written notice by either party with a minimum 90 days notice.
The notice shall state the grounds for the termination and the specific plans for
accommodating the affected jail population (per RCW 70.48.090 as amended).
Pursuant to RCW 39.34.040, each party shall be responsible for recording a copy of
this agreement with their County auditor and /or posting this agreement on the
agency's web -site.
15. Disputes: Disputes relating to the interpretation or administration of this agreement
that cannot be resolved by the representatives designated herein shall be referred to
the FORKS Mayor and CITY Mayor or their designees for settlement.
16. Joint Undertaking or Separate Entity: Pursuant to the requirements of RCW
39.34.030(3), the parties specify the following: 1) no new or separate legal or
administrative entity is created by the provisions of this agreement; 2) the parties to
this Agreement are each responsible for their own duties under this agreement; 3) no
-5-
E - 49
joint financing or budget is required; and 4) and no real or personal property will be
jointly acquired by the parties under this Agreement. All property owned by each of
the parties shall remain its sole property to hold and dispose of in its sole discretion.
17. Non - Delegation /Non - Assignment: Neither party may delegate the performance of any
contractual obligation, to a third party, unless mutually agreed in writing. Neither party
may assign this agreement without the written consent of the other party.
18. Each Agency's officers, agents, nor employees are employees of the individual
Agency for any purpose including responsibility for any federal or state tax, industrial
insurance or Social Security liability. No provision of services under this Agreement
shall give rise to any claim of career service or civil service right, which may accrue to
an employee of the Agency under any applicable law, rule, or regulation.
19. Severability: If any provision of this contract shall be held invalid, the remainder of this
contract shall not be affected thereby if such remainder would then continue to serve
the purposes and objectives of both parties.
DATED this day of 2013. DATED this day of 2013.
City of Forks City of Port Angeles
Mayor Mayor
Chief of Police Chief of Police
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney City Attorney
PORTANGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: MAY 21, 2013
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CARLA JACOBI, POLICE RECORDS SPECIALIST
SUBJECT: COPY MACHINE LEASE RENEWAL
Summary: The Police Department leases two copy machines from Pacific Office Equipment
(POE) under terms established through the City's membership with the King County
Directors' Association (KCDA). The membership allows to Department to obtain the best
possible price on such things as copy machine leases. The Department's current copy
machine leases have been in effect since 2009 and will soon expire. Renewal of the leases
requires Council approval. The proposed terms of the new leases are explained in the body of
this memo. The copy machines are critical to the operation of the police Records Division.
The costs associated with the new leases represent an approximate $16.00 per month increase
to the Department. All costs were included in the 2013 budget.
Recommendation: Approve the Police Department's request to renew the two Canon copier
leases from POE under the KCDA government contract, and authorize a purchase order for
the equipment.
Background /Analysis:
In July 2009, the Police Department entered into a 48 -month lease agreement for two Canon
Copiers from POE via the King County Director's Association (KCDA) Contract. KCDA is a
purchasing cooperative owned by Washington's school districts. KCDA saves money for
members by ordering in volume and supporting their purchasing and distribution requirements.
The City of Port Angeles is a member of this cooperative. The current lease agreements expire at
the end of June 2013. The Police Department received quotes from Derrick Dickinson, with POE,
for two new Canon Copiers, also through the KCDA contract, for another 48- months. These
quotes are attached for reference.
Proposed Copier lease fees and cost per copy charges Canon IRA4025:
Monthly Lease fee: $128.11 (increase of $4.08 per month)
Black & White copies: $0.01 (increase of $0.0011 per copy)
Scans: $0.003 (increase of $0.0125 per scan)
E -51
COPY MACHINE LEASE RENEWAL
PAGE 2
Current Canon IR3325 lease fees and cost per copy charges:
Monthly Lease fee:
Black & White copies:
Scans:
$124.03
$0.0089
$0.00175
Proposed Copier lease fees and cost per copy charges Canon IRAC5240:
Monthly Lease Fee:
Black & White copies:
Color Copies:
Scans:
$254.28
$0.0074
$0.063
$0.003
(increase of $23.41 per month)
(decrease of $0.0016 per copy)
(decrease of $0.002 per copy)
(increase of $0.0125 per scan)
Current Canon IR3080i lease fees and cost per copy charges:
Monthly lease fee:
Black & White copies:
Color Copies:
Scans:
$230.87
$0.009
$0.065
$0.00175
There will be a one -time charge of $255 plus tax ($276.42) per machine for Network Connection
fee and surge protector, for a total of $552.84. All costs as presented have been included in the
2013 budget.
The proposed lease agreements increase our current monthly lease fees by $27.91, however, Mr.
Dickinson reported that the decreased cost per copy cost with the new color copier saves us $11.52
per month based on our average monthly usage with our current color copier. There is also no cost
for us to return our current copiers at the end of the lease term. Additionally we receive free
service and supplies for the copiers with the cost per copy maintenance agreement.
Records staff reports that "it's been an absolutely wonderful experience working with POE for the
last four years ". They have provided outstanding customer service, responded very quickly with
service calls, and normally deliver supply orders the same day they are ordered. Further comments
from Records staff: The copiers were brand new when we received them, and have performed very
well. The few times we've called for service, a technician arrived the same day, or early the next
morning, depending on the time the service call was reported. The technicians are well
experienced and knowledgeable. Repairs are completed swiftly, with little down time or
inconvenience to us. We have limited services available to us on the Olympic Peninsula, and POE
never fails to deliver.
Pacific Office Equipment
Serving the North Olympic Peninsula
360- 417 -3600 /800- 962 -8714
www.poelnccom
May 6, 2013
City of Port Angeles Police Dept.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Attn: Carla
Information and pricing is included for the Canon IRA4025 Digital Copier System. This is a
new machine. Rated speed is 25 pages per minute. Washington State WSCA Contract # 07912 pricing
and includes all discounts, trade -in- allowances, copier hardware installation & training
Equipment
Canon IRA4025 System (25cpm)
Automatic Document Feeder -AG1
2 x 550 Sheet Paper Drawers
80 Sheets Stack Feed Bypass
Duplexing
Inner Finisher -D1
UFRII Printing
*Color Universal Send
*PCL Print Kit -AN I
Cassette Feed Unit (2 x 550 sheet paper trays)
Power Protection Unit
*Delivery, Copier Installation, Training
48 Month Lease
$ 51.37
$ 12.80
standard
standard
standard
$ 20.15
standard
standard
$ 11.76
$ 25.24
$ 6.79
included
$ 128.11 per month
* Prices shown do not include sales tax. Pricing subject to change per Washington State WSCA contract
# 07912.
* Additional installation including print drivers, training, scan destination set -up or software to be billed
@ $95.00 per hour.
Service and Supplies would be guaranteed for the term of model listing on WA State WSCA contract # 07912.
Renewal thereafter subject to review on an annual basis. Under our cost per print program, P.O.E. will guarantee all
your Parts, Labor, Service, Toner, Drums and Loaner machine if ever needed. All B/W Copies and Prints
$0.01.
Thank you for the opportunity to earn your continued business. If there are any questions, please feel free
to contact me in the office or on my cell phone @ 360 -461 -2669.
Respectfully,
Derrick Dickinson
E -53
Pacific Office Equipment
Serving the North Olympic Peninsula
360 - 417 -3600 / 800- 962 -8714
www.poeinc.com
May 6,2013
City of Port Angeles Police Dept.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Attn: Carla
Information and pricing is included for the Canon IRAC5240 Digital Copier System. This is a
new machine. Rated speed is 40 pages per minute Black and 35 Pages per minute Color. Washington
State WSCA Contract # 07912 pricing and includes all discounts, trade -in- allowances, copier hardware
installation & training
Equipment
Canon IRAC5240 System
Automatic Document Feeder
2 x 550 Sheet Paper Drawers
100 Stack Feed Bypass
Duplexing
Staple Finisher -J1
512MB Memory Type D
UFRII Printing
*Color Universal Send
*PCL Print Kit -AR 1
*PS Print Kit -ARI
Fax Kit -A 1
Cassette Feed Unit (2 x 550 sheet paper trays)
Power Protection Unit
*Delivery, Copier Installation, Training
48 Month Lease
$ 128.66
standard
standard
standard
standard
$ 47.01
$ 2.84
standard
standard
$ 13.00
$ 19.50
$ 13.93
$ 25.26
$ 4.08
included
$ 254.28 per month
* Prices shown do not include sales tax. Pricing subject to change per Washington State WSCA contract
# 07912.
* Additional installation including print drivers, training, scan destination set -up or software to be billed
@ $95.00 per hour.
Service and Supplies would be guaranteed for the term of model listing on WA State WSCA contract # 07912
Renewal thereafter subject to review on an annual basis. Under our cost per print program, P.O.E. will guarantee all
your Parts, Labor, Service, Toner, Drums and Loaner machine if ever needed. All B/W Copies and Prints @
$0.0074. All Color Copies and Prints @$0.063. (Paper not included)
Thank you for the opportunity to earn your continued business. If there are any questions, please feel free
to contact me in the office or on my cell phone @ 360 -461 -2669.
Respectfully,
Derrick Dickinson
E -54
PoRNGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
DATE: May 21, 2013
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: NATHAN A. WEST, DIRECTOR
COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS - MCA 13 -01
MINOR AMENDMENTS TO TITLES 8, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, AND 17
Summary: Final consideration of minor amendments to land use regulations found in the Port
Angeles Municipal Code.
Recommendation: Conduct 2nd Reading of Ordinances and Adopt.
Background / Analysis: The City Council conducted a public hearing on May 7, 2013, in
consideration of proposed minor amendments to land development standards contained in the Port
Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC). The proposed amendments provide clarity, correct errors, and
result in greater efficiencies and consistency of application. The proposed changes affect Titles 8,
11, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 of the PAMC.
During Council's discussion following the May 7 public hearing, Council Member Bruch asked
for clarification of the proposed amendment to Section 8.30.060 PAMC. The amendment was
initiated due to confusion by a property owner regarding separation distances required when
parking a vehicle in a side yard. The separation distances between structures and a vehicle parked
in a side yard are to ensure adequate circulation in the event of an emergency. The current
language was misinterpreted by a citizen who believed, that the wording "on one of' the side
property lines meant that the property owner could park a vehicle to the property line on one side
of a site as long as the required setback for such use existed somewhere on the site, meaning the
opposite side of the property where the vehicle was not parked. The minor change is hoped to
make clear that the separation distances are from any structure, i.e., house, detached structure, or
fence, when parking a vehicle in a side yard. The addition of numerical identifiers is intended only
for ease of reading: not a change to existing standards.
Staff is prepared to address any concerns that you may have during the continued discussion.
Attachments: Proposed ordinances and amendment explanations
PROPOSED MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS
HEALTH AND SANITATION - SECTION 8.30.060
➢ 8.30.060 - Parking of vehicles on residential property.
The primary function of yards on residential lots is to provide access to light and air and to
provide circulation, recreation, and landscaping. It is the intent of this section to establish
standards by which parking vehicles on residential lots is allowable. The parking or
storage of vehicles on residential lots in violation of the following standards shall be
considered a nuisance, and subject to penalties in accordance with this chapter.
Intact, operable, and appropriately licensed vehicles may be parked or stored outside an
approved structure subject to the following conditions:
A. Side yard and rear yard. Parking of vehicles on residential lots in the side and rear
yard areas shall be limited to those lots which have legal access from the adjacent
street or alley. Parking in side and rear yard areas combined shall be limited to up
to four vehicles or to no more than 40 percent of the combined side and rear yard
area, whichever is less. In addition, vehicles may be parked in a side or rear yard
only if the following conditions are met:
1. All vehicles parked in a side yard must have a minimum of three (3) feet of
unobstructed space between the vehicle and any the structure, and have a
minimum of five(5) feet vehicle -clear space on- ene-of from the side property
lines.
2. No more than four (4) vehicles of any kind may be parked in a bask rear
yard.
3. All vehicles parked in a side or back are on an improved or maintained
surface.
The previous wording has proven confusing to the general public. The wording provides
clarity of the clear space that must be observed between structures and the side property
line in question. The change in the word "rear" yard rather than "back" yard is because
"rear yard" is a term defined by Code but "back yard" is not.
➢ 11.08.240 - Protective measures, barriers, and lights required.
A. The permittee shall erect such fence, railing or barriers about the site of the
excavation work and shall prevent danger to persons using the City streets or sidewalks,
and such protective barriers shall be maintained until the work shall be completed or the
danger removed. At- twilight One half hour before sunset, there shall be placed upon such
place of excavation, excavated materials, and upon the protective barriers, suitable and
sufficient lights which shall be kept burning throughout the night during the maintenance of
such obstructions.
A request was made to define "twilight" because it can be argued that it is a vague term.
- PUBLIC UTILITIES - SECTION 13.32.040 –
➢ 13.32.040 - New residential service connection fee.
A. The fee for new residential water service connections, including the meter, shall be
as set forth in Chapter 3.70 PAMC.
✓ B. Whenever residential water service connections are to be installed by the
Department at the same time a water main is being installed, the fee for new
connections may be reduced by ten percent for each such connection, when ten or
more adjacent connections are installed simultaneously. All excavations of trench,
exposure of the main and trench backfill shall be provided by the applisation
applicant's designated representative
C This fee shall cover the cost of tapping the City's water main for the necessary size of
service, installing the copper tubing, type "K" or 200 p.s i PVC or P E. necessary to reach to within two
feet of the property line, to a maximum distance of 60 feet, and provide and install a yoke, shut -off,
meter and meter box. For any additional extra length of service pipe beyond 60 feet, the customer shall
be billed for the additional cost plus administrative overhead. (Ord. 3265 § 2, 1/1/2007; Ord. 3226 § 3
(part), 1/01/2006; Ord 2932 § 25, 10/11/1996, Ord 2181 Ch 3 § 4, 12/3/1981)
The fee information in Item A is being added for reference and will cause the fee amount to
be updated when Chapter 3 (Fees) is updated. The correction in Item B is an obvious
correction since an application cannot perform an activity.
SIGN CODE
➢ 14.36.095(D): Any sign which is not properly maintained may be subject to abatement
as a nuisance
The Uniform Sign Code (USC) does not provide abatement procedures; the abatement
process is provided through the PAMC. – The amendment is a correction of that
misinformation.
➢ 14.40.090 - Parking space requirement modification —New uses in existing
structures.
A change of use in a building or structure that exists as of April 25, 2004, that does not
change the use classification of the existing building or structure may occur without
provision of additional off - street parking spaces unless the floor area of the building or
structure is increased. (Ord 3161 § 1 (part), 4/30/2004, Ord. 2765, § 2, 6/25/1993, Ord 2740 §
1, 1/29/1993, Ord 2667 § 1, 1/17/1992, Ord. 2228 § 12, 8/31/1982, Ord 2097 § 1, 8/19/1980, Ord
2028 § 4, 6/17/1979, Ord 1588 § 12, 6/15/1966 )
The intent of this wording is to acknowledge that existing use classifications (i.e.,
residential to commercial) at the time of a Code change can remain for as long as there is
no change in that use classification. When that pre existing use classification is proposed
for change, current development standards apply. The current wording does not clearly
identify that a use change instigates compliance with current standards of development.
H -3
RS — 9 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY ZONE — SECTION 17.11 PAMC
➢ 17.11.040 - Conditional uses.
A. Accessory residential units.
B. Agricultural nurseries and greenhouses.
C. Art galleries and museums.
D. Assisted living facility.
E. Churches.
F. Communications transmission buildings and structures; e.g., radio tower.
G. Child day -care centers and pre- schools.
H. Duplexes on lots greater than 14,000 square feet in area
I. Group homes and hospices.
J. Libraries.
K. Nursing and convalescent homes.
L. Public parks and recreation facilities.
M. Public utility structures.
N. Public and private schools.
O. Radio and television stations, provided that antenna is on site.
P. Residential care facilities.
Q. Other uses compatible with the intent of this chapter.
(Ord. 2948 § 5 (part), 2/14/1997; Ord. 2861 § 1 (part), 3/17/1995; Ord. 2652 § 5,
9/27/1991; Ord. 2636 § 3, 5/15/1991; Ord. 2385 § 2 (part), 3/28/1986; Ord. 1709 § 1 (part),
12/22/1970)
The minimum area for duplexes is listed in the RS -7 zone text but is not listed in the RS -9
zone text. The minimum area for duplexes in residential zones is identified in Table A that
is included in the Zoning Ordinance but which is found at the rear of the Code section and
is therefore easy to overlook. The correction is for ease of reference.
ENVIRONMENT - SECTION 15.08.050
Shoreline Permit and Shorelands /Wetlands Designation Guidelines
➢ 15.08.050 - Definitions.
In addition to those definitions contained within RCW 90.58.030 and WAC 173 11 030, the
following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context indicates otherwise.
WAC 173 -14 -030 does not exist.
SHORT SUBDIVISION - Chapter 16.04
Chapter 16.04 continues to reference the "Community Development Director" which
needs to be corrected to be "Community & Economic Development Director." This title
change was made several years ago but has not found its way into this Chapter.
r 16.04.140 - Final short plat— Improvements— Required.
The following minimum improvements shall be made or installed for each lot created by
the short subdivision, before final short plat approval:
A. Watermains and other appurtenances necessary to provide adequate potable
water supply and fire protection as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, the Urban
Services Ordinance and the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines
promulgated reliable with and pursuant to PAMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.130
B. Sanitary sewer or approved septic tank and drain field site;
C. Power, telephone, and all other necessary utilities.
D. Appropriate dedications or easements if required;
E. Minimum street improvement cross - section standard as set forth in the
Comprehensive Plan, the Urban Services Ordinance, and the Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines:
1. Improvements to local access streets:
a. In the RS -9 and RS -11 zones, local access streets that front or will
provide access from the nearest fully improved City street to newly created lots
shall be improved to a minimum of 20 -foot wide asphaltic concrete street with no
on- street parking, drainage swales (ditches) as needed, and one all-weather
surfacc four -foot wide path cement concrete sidewalk or other acceptable hard
surface (eight -foot wide path surface when on an adopted bicycle route) for
pedestrian traffic. All dead -end City streets in excess of 150 feet in length shall be
asphaltic concrete paved and provided with a turn - around consistent with the
Urban Services Ordinance, the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines, and the
International* Fire Code.
* "Uniform Fire Code" updated to "International Fire Code"
b. In the RS -7 zone, local access streets that front or will provide
access from the nearest fully improved City street to newly created Tots
H -5
shall be improved to a minimum of 20 -foot wide asphaltic concrete street
with one three -foot wide shoulder, and one six -foot wide shoulder for
pedestrian traffic. All dead -end City streets in excess of 150 feet in length
shall be asphaltic concrete paved and provided with a turn - around
consistent with the Urban Services Ordinance, the Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines, and the International* Fire Code.
* "Uniform Fire Code" updated to "International Fire Code"
2. Improvements to arterial streets:
a. In the RS -9 and RS -11 zones, arterial streets that front or will
provide access to the lots or parcels being developed shall be improved to
the minimum of 24 -foot wide asphaltic concrete street with no on- street
parking, drainage swales (ditches) as needed, and one ^" weather c„rface
four -foot wide path cement concrete sidewalk, or other acceptable hard
surface (eight -foot wide path . - . surface when on an
adopted bicycle route) for pedestrian traffic, which path shall be separated
from the street by a ditch.
b. In the RS -7 zone, arterial streets that front or will provide access to
the lots or parcels being developed shall be improved to the minimum City
arterial street improvement standards.
The only change to these sections is to identify that the pedestrian path must be cement
concrete or other acceptable hard surface which is currently required by the Urban
Services and Standards Guidelines. It is necessary to develop sidewalks that are of a
solid, permanent material largely to accommodate ADA requirements and to eliminate
constant maintenance. Gravel paths have resulted in the disbursal, removal, or
debilitation of the surface material such that the walking surface becomes unstable or
requires intensive maintenance. The use of materials that do not result in a hard surface
(e.g., gravel) is that results in extensive maintenance including weeding and repair by
either the property owner or the City. Since this provision was added to Code, people
have knowingly removed the gravel surface, it has become debilitated from snow and rain
such that it is not sustainable and unusable, and is not accessible by the disabled. City
requirements should not result in a direction for development of unsafe or unsuitable
public walking path surfaces or those that result in Code compliance enforcement and
maintenance. The proposed wording provides clarity as to the required, acceptable,
developed surface condition that will result in sustainable public walkways(paths) that are
not standard sidewalks.
ZONING — Section 17.08.010
17.08.010 PAMC - Definitions.
B. Accessory residential unit. a habitable unit added to, created within, or detached from a
primary single- family residential dwelling that provides basic requirements for living, sleeping,
eating, cooking, and sanitation as outlined by the International Residential Building Code. An
accessory residential unit (ARU) is incidental to a detached primary single
family residence, is subordinate in space (i.e., 50 percent or less space than the primary single
family residential use), and is located on the same zoning lot as the primary single family
residence. An accessory residential unit is served by water and electrical service that is separate
from the primary residential service and has a separate address.
T \MCA\2013\2013 HOUSEKEEPING \CITYCOUNCILMEMO 050713 DOC
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington making
changes to Chapters 8.30, 11.08, 13.32, 14.36, 14.40, 16.04, 17.08 and
17.11, of the Port Angeles Municipal Code relating to Land Use.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DO HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Ordinance 3229 and Chapter 8.30 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code relating
to health and sanitation violations are hereby amended by amending Section 8.30.060 to read as
follows:
8.30.060 — Parking of vehicles on residential property.
The primary function of yards on residential lots is to provide access to light and air and
to provide circulation, recreation, and landscaping. It is the intent of this section to establish
standards by which parking vehicles on residential lots is allowable. The parking or storage of
vehicles on residential lots in violation of the following standards shall be considered a nuisance,
and subject to penalties in accordance with this chapter.
Intact, operable, and appropriately licensed vehicles may be parked or stored outside an
approved structure subject to the following conditions:
A. Side yard and rear yard. Parking of vehicles on residential lots in the side and
rear yard areas shall be limited to those lots which have legal access from the adjacent street or
alley. Parking in side and rear yard areas combined shall be limited to up to four vehicles or to no
more than 40 percent of the combined side and rear yard area, whichever is less. In addition,
vehicles may be parked in a side or rear yard only if the following conditions are met:
1. All vehicles parked in a side yard must have a minimum of three (3) feet
of unobstructed space between the vehicle and the any structure, and have a minimum of five (5)
feet vehicle -clear space efi-ene-o from the side property lines.
2. No more than four (4) vehicles of any kind may be parked in a back yard.
3. All vehicles parked in a side or back are on an improved or maintained
surface.
Section 2. Ordinance 2166 and Chapter 11.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code
relating to streets and sidewalks are hereby amended by amending Sections 11.08.240 to read as
follows:
11.08.240 — Protective measures, barriers, and lights required.
A. The permittee shall erect such fence, railing or barriers about the site of the
excavation work and shall prevent danger to persons using the City streets or sidewalks, and such
protective barriers shall be maintained until the work shall be completed or the danger removed.
At twilight, One half hour before sunset, there shall be placed upon such place of excavation,
excavated materials, and upon the protective barriers, suitable and sufficient lights which shall be
kept burning throughout the night during the maintenance of such obstructions.
Section 3. Ordinance 2181 and Chapter 13.32 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code
relating to new residential service connection fees are hereby amended by amending Section
13.32.040 to read as follows:
1332.040 — New residential service connection fee.
A. The fee for new residential water service connections, including the meter, shall
be as set forth in Chapter 3.70 PAMC.
B. Whenever residential water service connections are to be installed by the
Department at the same time a water main is being installed, the fee for new connections may be
reduced by ten percent for each such connection, when ten or more adjacent connections are
installed simultaneously. All excavations of trench, exposure of the main and trench backfill
shall be provided by the application applicant's designated representative.
C. This fee shall cover the cost of tapping the City's water main for the necessary
size of service, installing the copper tubing, type "K" or 200 p.s.i. PVC or P.E. necessary to reach
to within two feet of the property line, to a maximum distance of 60 feet, and provide and install
2
H -9
a yoke, shut -off, meter and meter box. For any additional extra length of service pipe beyond 60
feet, the customer shall be billed for the additional cost plus administrative overhead.
Section 4. Ordinance 3126 and Chapter 14.36 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code
relating to the Sign Code are hereby amended by amending Chapter 14.36.095 to read as
follows:
14.36.095 — Maintenance.
A. Signs shall be maintained to protect the public safety, present a well kept
appearance, and prevent deterioration, such that the sign is maintained in its original condition.
B. A permit shall be required for structural and electrical modification, but not
normal repair and maintenance.
C. The Building Division shall notify the business owner and the sign owner or
lessee and the owner of the property of each sign that is not maintained per subsection A.
D. Any sign which is not properly maintained may be subject to abatement as a
nuisance per the Uniform Sign Code
Section 5. Ordinance 1588 and Chapter 14.40 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code
relating to Off Street Parking are hereby amended by amending Chapter 14.40.090 to read as
follows:
14.40.090 — Parking space requirement modification — New uses in existing structures.
A change of use in a building or structure that exists as of April 25, 2004, that does not
chan • e these classification of the existin buildin or structure may occur without provision of
additional off - street parking spaces unless the floor area of the building or structure is increased.
Section 6. Ordinance 2222 and Chapter 16.04 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code
relating to short subdivision are hereby amended by amending Chapter 16.04.140 to read as
follows:
16.04.140 — Final short plat — Improvements — Required.
The following minimum improvements shall be made or installed for each lot created by
the short subdivision, before final short plat approval:
3
H -10
A. Watermains and other appurtenances necessary to provide adequate potable water
supply and fire protection as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, the Urban Services Ordinance
and the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines promulgated consistent with and pursuant to
PAMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.130
B. Sanitary sewer or approved septic tank and drain field site;
C. Power, telephone, and all other necessary utilities.
D. Appropriate dedications or easements if required;
E. Minimum street improvement cross - section standard as set forth in the
Comprehensive Plan, the Urban Services Ordinance, and the Urban Services Standards and
Guidelines:
1. Improvements to local access streets:
a. In the RS -9 and RS -11 zones, local access streets that front or will
provide access from the nearest fully improved City street to newly created lots shall be
improved to a minimum of 20 -foot wide asphaltic concrete street with no on- street parking,
drainage swales (ditches) as needed, and one all weather surface four -foot wide path cement
concrete sidewalk (eight -foot wide path when an adopted bicycle route) for pedestrian traffic,
which path shall be separated from the street by a ditch. All dead -end City streets in excess of
150 feet in length shall be asphaltic concrete paved and provided with a turn- around consistent
with the Urban Services Ordinance, the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines, and the
International* Fire Code.
* "Uniform Fire Code" updated to "International Fire Code'
b. In the RS -7 zone, local access streets that front or will provide
access from the nearest fully improved City street to newly created lots shall be improved to a
minimum of 20 -foot wide asphaltic concrete street with one three -foot wide shoulder, and one
six -foot wide shoulder for pedestrian traffic. All dead -end City streets in excess of 150 feet in
length shall be asphaltic concrete paved and provided with a turn- around consistent with the
Urban Services Ordinance, the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines, and the International*
Fire Code.
* "Uniform Fire Code" updated to "International Fire Code"
2. Improvements to arterial streets:
a. In the RS -9 and RS -11 zones, arterial streets that front or will
provide access to the lots or parcels being developed shall be improved to the minimum of 24-
foot wide asphaltic concrete street with no on- street parking, drainage swales (ditches) as
needed, and one all weather surface four -foot wide path cement concrete sidewalk or other
acceptable hard surface (eight -foot wide path surface when on an adopted bicycle route) for
pedestrian traffic, which path shall be separated from the street by a ditch.
4
H -11
b. In the RS -7 zone, arterial streets that front or will provide access to
the lots or parcels being developed shall be improved to the minimum City arterial street
improvement standards.
3. EXCEPTION: The Public Works and Utilities Department shall require
the minimum standard to be increased to match the immediately adjoining City street when the
immediately adjoining City street is more fully developed than the minimum standard. This
exception shall not apply to short plats when the City finds that there will be an economic and
physical hardship in relocating public utilities and there will be no increase in the number of lots
within a subject short plat.
F. Drainage ditches and /or culverts shall be provided to address existing and
anticipated storm water run -off occurring on the site and/or within the City rights -of -way and
easements as set forth in the Urban Services Ordinance and Clearing and Grading Ordinance
development standards.
G. The subdivider shall provide a street profile acceptable to the Public Works and
Utilities Department for the local access streets if the final street grade has not been previously
established or accepted by the City.
H. The subdivider shall execute an L.I.D. consent and non - protest agreement or other
agreement acceptable to the City for street and utilities improvements on the local access streets
whenever required improvements are less than the City's full development standards, as set forth
in the Comprehensive Plan, the Urban Services Ordinance, and the Urban Services Standards
and Guidelines promulgated consistent with and pursuant to PAMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.130
I. The subdivider shall provide all other public improvements as may be required
and set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, the Urban Services Ordinance, and the Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines promulgated consistent with and pursuant to PAMC 18.08.040 and
18.08.130
J. When commercially zoned property is being short platted without any increase in
the number of lots, the minimum improvements required by this section may be made or
installed after short plat approval without the necessity of being bonded, provided that the final
short plat shall be conditioned to provide that such improvements shall be made or installed as
part of the building permit process, that vertical construction of the building shall not begin
unless or until the International* Fire Code's fire hydrant requirement has been met, and that the
property or development shall not be occupied until such improvements have been completed,
provided further that said construction shall be noted on the final plat.
K. Sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for
students who only walk to and from school shall be provided pursuant to RCW 58.17.060 and
RCW 58.17.110.
5
H -12
Section 7. Ordinance 1709 and Chapter 17.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code
relating to zoning are hereby amended by amending Chapter 17.08.010 to read as follows:
17.08.010 - "A."
A. Accessory building or use. one which is subordinate and incidental to and serves
a principal building or principal use and which is located on the same zoning lot as the principal
building or principal use served.
B. Accessory residential unit. a dwelling unit which a habitable unit added to,
created within or detached from a .rimar sin ! le -famil residential dwellin ' that .rovides basic
re uirements for livin
slee. in ' eatin � cookin and sanitation as outlined b the International
Residential Building Code. An accessory residential unit (ARU) is incidental to a detached
primary single family residence, is subordinate in space (i.e., 50 percent or less space than the
primary single family residential use), and is located on the same zoning lot as the single family
residence. An accessory residential unit is served by water and electrical service that is separate
from the primary residential service and has a separate address.
C. Adult family home. a one family dwelling of a person or persons who are
providing personal care, room and board to more than one but not more than six
adults who are not related by blood or marriage to the person or persons providing the services
and who are licensed by the State of Washington pursuant to Chapter 18.48 and Chapter
70.128 RCW (Adult Family Home regulations).
D. Affordable housing. residential housing available for sale or rent that
requires a monthly housing cost, including utilities other than telephone, of no
more than 30 percent of the income of an eligible household. An eligible household is one with
a total household income no greater than 80 percent of the Clallam County median income as
reported by the Washington State Office of Financial Management.
E. Alley. A public right -of -way which provides service access to abutting property.
F. Amendment. A change in language of the zoning text which is an official part of
these Zoning Regulations.
G. Animal husbandry, commercial. the care and raising of animals, particularly farm
animals, for agricultural or other commercial purposes, provided that this shall not include
noncommercial animal husbandry, private horse stables, up to three dogs and cats which are not
house pets, or house pets.
H. Animal husbandry, noncommercial. the care and raising of animals for
noncommercial purposes, provided that this shall not include private horse stables, kennels, up to
three dogs and cats which are not house pets, or house pets.
6
H -13
I. Antenna. Any pole, panel, rod, reflection disc including satellite earth station
antenna as defined by 47 CFR Sections 1.4000 and 25.104, or similar device used for the
transmission and /or reception of radio frequency signals.
J. Antenna support structure. Any building or structure other than a tower which can
be used for location of telecommunications facilities.
K. Apartment. A room, or a suite of two or more rooms in a multiple dwelling,
occupied or suitable for occupancy as a dwelling unit for one family.
L. Applicant. Any person that applies for approval from the City.
M. Application. The process by which the owner of a parcel of land within the City
submits a request to develop, construct, build, modify, erect or use such parcel of land.
"Application" includes all written documentation, verbal statements, and representations, in
whatever form or forum, made by an applicant to the City concerning such a request.
N. Assisted living facility or boarding home. a residential facility that provides
domiciliary services to three or more persons of the age 65 or more, or less than age 65 who by
reason of infirmity require domiciliary care and who do not require the more intensive care
provided by a nursing home, and that is licensed by the State as a "boarding home" pursuant to
chapter 18.20 RCW.
Section 8. Ordinance 1709 and Chapter 17.11 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code relating
to zoning are hereby amended by amending Chapter 17.11.040 to read as follows:
17.11.040 - Conditional uses.
A. Accessory residential units.
B. Agricultural nurseries and greenhouses.
C. Art galleries and museums.
D. Assisted living facility.
E. Churches.
F. Communications transmission buildings and structures; e.g., radio tower.
G. Child day -care centers and pre - schools.
H. Duplexes on lots greater than 14,000 square feet in area.
I. Group homes and hospices.
J. Libraries.
K. Nursing and convalescent homes.
L. Public parks and recreation facilities.
M. Public utility structures.
N. Public and private schools.
7
H -14
O. Radio and television stations, provided that antenna is on site.
P. Residential care facilities.
Q. Other uses compatible with the intent of this chapter
Section 9- Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the
correction of the scrivener's /clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection
numbers and any references thereto.
Section 10 - Severability. If any provisions of this Ordinance, or its application to any
person or circumstances, are held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, or application of the
provisions of the Ordinance to other persons or circumstances, is not affected.
Section 11- Effective Date. This Ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum. This ordinance shall take
effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof
consisting of the title.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the day of 2013.
CHERIE KIDD, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Janessa Hurd, City Clerk
PUBLISHED: , 2013
By Summary
G \LEGAL \a ORDINANCES &RESOLUTIONS \ORDINANCES 2013 \01 - PAMC Land Use Amendments 05 02 13 docx
8
H -15
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington making
changes to Chapter 15.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code relating
to environment definitions.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DO HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Ordinance 2033 and Chapter 15.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code
relating to environment definitions are hereby amended by amending Section 15.08.050 to read
as follows:
15.08.050—Definitions.
In addition to those definitions contained within RCW 90.58.030 and WAC 173 1'1 030, the following
terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context indicates otherwise.:
Section 2- Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the
correction of the scrivener's /clerical en-ors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection
numbers and any references thereto.
Section 3 - Severability. If any provisions of this Ordinance, or its application to any
person or circumstances, are held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, or application of the
provisions of the Ordinance to other persons or circumstances, is not affected.
Section 4 - Effective Date. This Ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum. This ordinance shall take
1
H -16
effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof
consisting of the title.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the day of 2013.
CHERIE KIDD, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Janessa Hurd, City Clerk
PUBLISHED: , 2013
By Summary
G \LEGAL \a ORDINANCES &RESOLUTIONS \ORDINANCES 2013 \01 - PAMC Code Amendments 2 09 13 docx
CITY OF
PRTINGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: MAY 21, 2013
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: NATHAN A. WEST, DIRECTOR
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: PRESENTATION OF FEIRO/NOAA PRE - DESIGN STUDY
Summary: Over the past year the City has worked with the Feiro Marine Life Center and
NOAA Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary to develop a pre- design study for a multi -
agency campus focused on marine -based research, education, and outreach.
Recommendation: 1.) Listen to Presentation. 2.).Authorize staff to work with Feiro and
NOAA to implement the pre- design Study and formalize project details in a memorandum of
agreement for future Council consideration.
Background / Analysis:
The Feiro Marine Life Center (FMLC), NOAA Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary (OCNMS)
and the City of Port Angeles developed a relationship to evaluate a multi- agency campus facility in
Downtown Port Angeles. Last summer Council authorized a City commitment of up to $22,000 from
the Economic Development Fund for one -third of the cost of a pre- design study. A request for
proposals was issued and FMLC contracted with Miller Hull to complete the scope of work.
The final Report summarizes discussions between the City of Port Angeles, FMLC, and OCNMS
on a collective vision for a shared facility in downtown Port Angeles area. It builds on
assessments done individually for FMLC and OCNMS over the past 2 years. The facility is
envisioned as a major economic driver for revitalization of downtown Port Angeles, something the
community can use as well as a major attraction for visitors. Partners see a great opportunity to
build on the momentum and vision of the Downtown Waterfront Transportation Plan while
meeting OCNMS and FMLC long term aspirations to better serve the community. A shared
facility would promote and reinforce the partner's common pursuit of ocean research, education,
and environmental stewardship.
The report focuses on efficiencies in sharing space that would allow the project to move forward in
a cost effective manner, especially important in lean budget times. It also identifies the anticipated
space needed by each organization. Common goals are identified including, criteria for a selecting
a location and evaluation of four (4) specific locations. It is important to note that no decisions on
location have been made.
The partners are now collectively evaluating next steps including the development of plans on how
we work collectively to implement the pre- design study. Staff recommends that Council listen to the
presentation and authorize staff to work with FMLC and OCNMS to implement the pre- design
Study and formalize project details in a memorandum of agreement for future Council
consideration. Funding is not required as part of these preliminary next steps.
Attachment Miller Hull — Pre - Design Report
I
Ci
N
-.1
CL
Q
CO
0
0
U
0
cc
a.
W
1
W
izcC
"/n this new wave of technology, you can't do it
all yourself, you have to form alliances."
CARLOS SLIMHELU (INVESTOR AND PHILANTHROPIST)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Feiro Marine Life Center, a non - profit educational
and scientific organization promoting marine
education and conservation in Port Angeles,
Washington, has outgrown its existing facility on the
City Pier. NOAA's Olympic Coast National Marine
Sanctuary (OCNMS), which is Feiro's principal
education partner, is searching for an opportunity
to upgrade its Olympic Coast Discovery Center
and administration facility. Meanwhile, the City of
Port Angeles is investing millions of dollars in its
downtown waterfront (www.pa - waterfront.org),
and recognizes and supports the growing need for
meeting and conference facilities. These organizations
have the opportunity to join together to create a civic
icon for the Port Angeles waterfront, and to inhabit in
II
partnership a facility that embraces efficiencies
in building program, function, and operations.
A shared facility will promote and reinforce the
partners' common pursuits of ocean research,
education, and advocacy. A shared facility will be an
iconic and unique gathering place for the community.
A shared facility will tell a more comprehensive
and cohesive story of marine life, both near -shore
and off - shore. A shared facility will enable each
organization's mission to be bigger than itself.
FEASIBILITY STUDY OVERVIEW AND GOALS
Recognizing the potential of this joint facility, this
study is a comprehensive review and compilation of
each partner organization's needs, and an analysis of
how these could be met in a shared facility. A series
of common goals were established to ensure that
the study focused on the overarching issues while
balancing individual organizational commitments
and potential development plans and paths.
• Improve each agency's ability to
serve and educate the public
• Give the city an iconic and welcoming
gathering place that celebrates its
unique waterfront location.
• Strengthen each organizations' identity.
• Kick -start economic development downtown.
• Create an inspiring educational place that
champions marine life and conservation.
• Tell the story of public, private,
and nonprofit collaboration.
• Establish this facility as a leader in ocean
research, education, advocacy and outreach.
As guiding principles for this study, these goals were
used to help guide decisions throughout the process.
CASE FOR A SHARED FACILITY
This study began with a recognition of the
opportunities of a shared facility, and proceeded to
identify the benefits for each partner in following
this path. The most immediate and measurable
efficiencies result from space sharing between
agencies. This brings down the total square footage
of the project, which reduces up -front construction
costs as well as long -term maintenance costs for
all three partners. In addition to cost savings,
there are numerous organizational and mission -
specific benefits for each of the partners:
Anticipated benefits for OCNMS include an
increased number of students and visitors to
the Olympic Coast Discovery Center due to the
draw of Feiro as well as a conference facility.
There is also an opportunity to connect more
easily to Feiro's programs, thereby increasing
the effectiveness of the Sanctuary's interpretive
program. The shared facility also provides an
opportunity for OCNMS to address research
needs, to better integrate with the community and
citizens of Port Angeles, and to align itself more
productively with the local good -will of its partner.
Benefits for Feiro include an anticipated increase
in students and visitors due to the partnership
with OCNMS and the draw of a conference facility.
Feiro's interpretive story will be enhanced as its
connections with OCNMS become more clearly
illustrated. In addition, Feiro will benefit from
the research culture and information assets of
their federal partner. Finally, with improved and
expanded meeting, classroom, and exhibit spaces,
Feiro will be positioned to host more community
events, and to generate additional revenue.
For the City of Port Angeles, there are a number
J -6
of public benefits and economic development
opportunities that are presented by a joint facility.
This facility has the potential to increase visitors
to the waterfront district and to extend their
stay in the city. The facility will immediately
create construction jobs and increase sales tax
revenue and will, over time, drive long -term
economic development while reinforcing the City's
investment in the Downtown Waterfront District.
RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT STRUCTURE
FOR THE PROJECT
After analyzing numerous sites and development
options for the joint facility, it was determined
that the most feasible approach was to engage
another public or private development partner.
This would provide yet another opportunity for
the current partners to create an alliance with an
organization that is better equipped to create and
manage a facility, allowing each organization to
better focus on their own missions and goals.
CONCLUSION
This project is feasible, it is timely, and it
requires the continued commitment and
effort of each of the partners. Two viable
options were thoroughly analyzed.
WM MIMI
VillilLESEZZI
CO
0
ND WELCOMING GATHERI
GIVE THE CITY AN ICONIC
UE WATERFRONT LOCATIO
0)
IN MS
L6.i
acC
PROGRAM OF SPACES
Planning for new facilities for both the Olympic
Coast National Marine Sanctuary and the Feiro
Marine Life Center has occurred periodically over the
years, concentrating on the immediate and future
needs of each organization. Each organization
recently completed Internal programming exercises
(Feiro Long -Range Facility Plan dated May 21, 2012
and A Facility Plan for Olympic Coast National
Marine Sanctuary dated April 2012), and both
efforts determined needs in a stand -alone facility
while acknowledging the benefits of sharing a
facility with a Tike- minded strategic partner.
SUMMA
A shared facility is the best way to maximize space
efficiency and minimize upfront construction costs
for the partner organizations. Not only are there
spaces that can be combined and made smaller than
two individual facilities, some redundant spaces can
actually be eliminated. This reduction in upfront and
continued operational costs (less area requires less
heating, cooling, cleaning, etc.), plus the opportunity
to better collaborate and deliver services, make a
shared facility the best option for each partner.
The programming effort associated with this
study included overlaying each organization's
SEPARATE BUILDINGS SHARED FACILITY
OCNMS
FEIRO
CONFERENCE FACILITY
NET -TO -GROSS
TOTAL
20,377 gsf2
14,407 gsf
(included above)
n/a
34,784 gsf
8,489 nsf'
8,077 nsf'
3,600 gsf3
7,736 gsf
27,902 gsf
2
(6,882 gsf space reduction)
1 Note that the original program totals were gross square foot calculations, while the shared facility numbers are net square feet with
a net -to -gross factor listed separately. Net square footage figures are used for calculating potential lease rates later in this document.
2. The OCNMS Facility Plan included consolidating off -site trailered- vessel and long -term storage into a new facility, but it was
determined that it was more cost - effective to continue storing this outside of the higher -rent downtown waterfront district.
3 1,200 sf of Conference Facility program is included in Feiro's leasable area total. This includes multipurpose spaces
specific to their program but anticipated to be designed to contribute to the conference facility program.
Program of Spaces and evaluating opportunities
for efficiencies. Discussions analyzed operational,
educational, interpretive/ exhibit, and meeting
space needs. The table on the preceeding
page includes a summary of the original area
allocations (in separate buildings) and the total
in a shared facility (prorated as appropriate, see
"Shared Spaces" for additional information).
Analysis primarily relied on the space allocations
provided in the referenced program documents, with
some adjustments through continued discussions
of programming needs during this study.
SHARED SPACES
Three categories of shared spaces were identified,
and the programmatic implications were evaluated.
HAREDfDUGATIP
PACE
LAB / CLASSROOM 1(WET)
LAB / CLASSROOM 2
EDUCATIONAL STORAGE (INC. ABV.)
LIBRARY / MEETING ROOM
CIRCULATION FACTOR (.25)
TOTAL
700
900
300
475
2,375
Educational spaces are recognized as an excellent
opportunity for realizing space efficiencies, as
staffs of both organizations already work closely
together on common programs. It is anticipated
that there will not only be efficiencies, but
that there is an opportunity to develop better/
more specialized instructional space than each
organization could afford to develop individually.
SHARED HPERATIO
WORKROOM / COPY
KITCHEN /BREAK
EXHIBITS MANAGER /VISITOR SERVICES
VOLUNTEERS (INC. ABV.)
DIVE ROOM WITH LOCKERS
SHOWERS (INC. ABV.)
CIRCULATION FACTOR (.25)
TOTAL
200
200
200
150
188
938
There are a number of overlapping functions
that support, and can be configured to serve, the
operations of each organization. Culturally, this
is an opportunity for both OCNMS and Feiro staff
and volunteers to work together and gain a better
perspective of their partner organization's mission
and processes. Accommodations will be made to
ensure NOAA security requirements are met, including
controlled access to specific spaces and parallel data
networks. Although these security requirements
were not fully analyzed, the table above indicates the
spaces most likely to be structured and configured
to optimize sharing between the organizations.
J -11
3
aSHARI
1. Assumes exhibits flow seamlessly from each other and do
not have internal halls or other circulation requirements.
Both Feiro and OCNMS envision a dramatic increase
in their respective exhibit spaces, with the goal of
increasing public information and education.
Feiro's focus on the Strait of Juan de Fuca, paired
with the OCNMS' focus on the ocean, creates a
natural opportunity to tell a more cohesive story
and to help create information links for visitors.
Feiro's live animal exhibits are an important part
of their identity as a fixture in the community,
and it is envisioned that this program will be
bolstered with additional opportunities for
interpretation. NOAA anticipates providing a
renewed and expanded visitor experience.
Currently, the Olympic Coast Discovery Center,
operated by OCNMS, is free with an optional
donation, while Feiro charges a modest gate fee.
Structuring this in a shared facility was discussed
at length, with various scenarios including charging
for both exhibits, providing two areas of exhibits
(one for charge, other free), and the option of
4
Feiro discontinuing admission charges. It was
agreed that there is a solution within the various
scenarios, with Feiro reiterating that their operational
budget relies on these fees. The partners agreed
to further evaluate and consider these options
through the facility and exhibit design processes.
PRORATING SHARED SPACES
The allocation of spaces (from a development cost and/
or lease rate perspective) most likely varies within each
of the categories listed above. It was agreed that the
group would revisit this issue as the design process and
space layout becomes more solidified, and it is recog-
nized that management plans for these spaces will be
required as well. Generally, the group proposed
allocating as follows:
a. Shared Educational Spaces:
50% Feiro/ 50% OCNMS
b. Shared Operational Spaces: based on staff FTE,
this study assumes 33% Feiro/ 67% OCNMS
c. Shared Exhibit Spaces: based on planned exhibits,
this study assumes 67% Feiro, 33% OCNMS
OCNMS SPACE
NISTRATIVE SPA"
SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE
DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT - OPERATIONS
DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT - PROGRAMS
ADMINISTRATIVE WORKSTATION
MARINE OPERATIONS OFFICER
IT SUPPORT
VESSEL OPERATOR
RESOURCE PROTECTION SPECIALIST OFFICE
PERMIT COORDINATOR
RESEARCH COORDINATOR
RESEARCH TECHNICIAN
DATABASE TECHNICIAN
MARINE GEOGRAPHER
MARINE BIOLOGIST
EDUCATION COORDINATOR
EDUCATION SPECIALIST
GRAPHIC ARTIST
CITIZEN SCIENCE
GROWTH OFFICE (2 @ 95)
GROWTH WORKSTATION (2 @ 64)
INTERN / PT / HOTELLING (2 @ 64)
TOTAL
200
95
95
80
80
80
80
95
95
95
80
80
95
80
95
95
80
80
190
128
128
2,126
SUPPORTS;
NN IS
SUPPLIES CLOSET (2 @ 75)
CONFERENCE ROOM
IT /DATA CLOSET
RECEPTION AREA
VIDEO LAB
WET LAB / RESEARCH
DRY LAB / ELECTRONICS STORAGE
STORAGE (3 @ 200)
CIRCULATION FACTOR (.25)
TOTAL
150
200
50
100
150
300
300
600
1,002
5,010
In addition to the shared spaces, each organization has
a number of spaces that are specific to their operations.
This study, with significant input from their staff, reviewed
the OCNMS program for current and future needs. Most
notably, after reviewing leases of existing and proposed
spaces and scrutinizing the desire to consolidate programs,
it was determined that the majority of the Warehouse
Program was most appropriately left off -site if frequently
accessed functions were a part of the new facility.
It was also emphasized that in order to best serve its
mission, OCNMS requirements include: infrastructure to
support vessel operations (e.g., dockage), adequate wet
& dry lab space to support research missions, and storage
and library space. In addition, OCNMS requirements
include an expanded visitor's center (sharejI)r 13
5
As mentioned, security considerations and
controlled access will be required at most if not
all of the spaces indicated. Additional effort will
be required to document and incorporate these
considerations during the design phases.
FEIRO ADMINISTRATION SPACE
Feiro operates as a relatively lean non - profit
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OFFICE
EDUCATION OFFICE
FACILITY OFFICE / MAINTENANCE SPACE
DEVELOPMENT OFFICE
SCIENTIST IN RESIDENCE
CIRCULATION FACTOR (.25)
TOTAL
125
300
250
80
80
209
1,044
organization, and their administrative needs
illustrate the fact that most of their resources are
associated with the educational and exhibit spaces
that have the most potential to be shared. The
spaces listed below represent the anticipated
expansion of Feiro staff and administration relative
to the increased facility size in this report.
6
CONFERENCE SPACE
Both the Feiro and OCNMS programs included
meeting/ conference spaces, but this program
(and need) was the least defined and least
documented prior to this study. After a preliminary
survey of facilities in the community, evaluation
of perceived need, and regional analysis of
similar communities and facilities, a program
was developed to accommodate a sub - dividable
250 to 300 person main meeting space, with
associated support spaces and functions.
.CONFERENC CENTER SHARED
LARGE MEETING / CONFERENCE SPACE
FOYER /PREFUNCTION
GREEN ROOM
TABLES / CHAIRS STORAGE
A/V EQUIPMENT ROOM
MECHANICAL
CATERING KITCHEN
RESTROOMS
CIRCULATION FACTOR (.I5)'
TOTAL
3,000
1,000
I00
200
100
100
200
400
700
5,800
1. Lower circulation factor is used due to the unique
nature of this program and the larger spaces.
0
u
0
111
0
c(
r2
LAJ
CA
O
Q*...1
ICC
CM
CD
i
act
W
Laa
G3
I.6l
H
C/?
SITE SELECTION
Despite the scale, site requirements, and downtown
waterfront district location, there are a number
of sites that warranted analysis and evaluation.
From renovation of existing space to new
construction, the site options cover the length
of the targeted downtown waterfront district.
I. CITY PIER
This is the location of the existing Feiro facility as well as
the civic park space, moorage, and amphitheater. City
Pier is the smallest site considered. Hollywood Beach
provides excellent marine educational opportunities,
while Peabody Creek provides freshwater options.
This site was evaluated and deemed suitable for
additional analysis, including a test fit of the program.
2A. THE LANDING (RENOVATION)
This scenario included the potential of renovating
this existing structure to contain the entire program
within the building's envelope. It is anticipated that
significant structural, mechanical, and architectural
upgrades would be required to create a facility that
meets the programmatic needs and architectural
goals of this project. This option was not selected
for additional analysis due to the significant cost
required to upgrade the existing building to meet the
project's goal of creating an icon for Port Angeles.
2B. THE LANDING (NEW CONSTRUCTION)
This option anticipated building a new structure
to the east of the existing Landing building, at
the location of the current parking structure/ pier.
This option included the potential of maintaining
some program in the existing structure as a cost
saving measure. This option was not selected
for additional analysis due largely to the site's
lack of exposure and outreach opportunity,
as well as its undesirable displacement of
parking in the downtown waterfront district.
3. RAILROAD AVENUE SITE
Comprising the full city block across from the Black
Ball terminal, the Railroad Avenue Site is an aggregate
of several parcels which holds an array of existing
structures and surface parking lots. Although site
acquisition/ entitlement appeared to be a hurdle,
this site was ultimately dismissed due to the lack
of direct access to fresh and marine water for both
educational activities and the Feiro live- animal tanks.
4. OAK STREET PROPERTY
At the west end of Railroad Avenue, the Oak
Street Property is surrounded by the planned
West End Park, providing an opportunity to
continue the public access and community
FOUR SITES CONSIDERED
engagement of the Feiro programs. The West
End Park project provides a variety of marine
water education activities, and the adjacent Valley
Creek provides nearby freshwater access. This
site was deemed suitable for additional analysis.
Starting with the Facility Plan for OCNMS, criteria
were established to evaluate each site's ability to
meet the operational, inspirational, and community
engagement goals of the project. Under each criteria
the organizations scored the site options either
positive, neutral, negative, or "fatally flawed" (if the
criteria couldn't be met). After the evaluations were
compiled and discrepancies were discussed, two sites
emerged as the top candidates for further analysis.
THE LANDING (RENOVATION)
RAILROAD AVENUE SITE
10
CUD
0,
T-,
I1
SCENARIO DETAILS
Two site options were evaluated in greater detail
and, when entitlement /development options
were overlaid, each became distinct in both its
physical location and its potential method of
development. Both scenarios were carried forward
through the entire evaluation process, and both
were analyzed in terms,of programmatic test fit
as well as preliminary Pro Forma and /or Business
Case studies. It was clear that either site is a viable
and successful option for future development.
Several "givens" hold true for both scenarios:
1. OCNMS/ NOAA is not in a legal/ procurement/
political position to develop this project, but will
likely be able to be an anchor tenant, committing
to a long -term lease, and to potentially contribute
initial capital for building. The method and
terms of entering a lease varies by scenario.
2. Operations of the Conference Center is unclear
at this time, but it is assumed that it will be further
assessed and evaluated from a business plan
standpoint and designed to be a self - sufficient
endeavor. Operations of the facility could be
conducted by Feiro or other public or private
commercial enterprises. There are other sites in
the vicinity that can be explored in further detail.
12
3. Given that both proposed sites are wholly
or partially within the WA Dept. of Natural
Resources Inner Harbor Line, it is critical that
additional effort and discussion with DNR be
completed to determine what specific issues will
need to be addressed. Preliminary discussions
with DNR were held regarding both sites, and
preliminary indications were that neither site
appeared to have a fatal flaw with this issue.
SCENARIO ONE: CITY PIER
NEW BUILDING
HOLLYWOOD BEACH
Constructing the new facility on City Pier is an
attractive option for many of the partners, provided
the entire facility program could be accommodated
to realize all of the efficiencies and benefits. After
completing the initial test fits, it was determined that
the facility could in fact fit entirely on the site and
likely fit well into the massing and scale character
of the Port Angeles waterfront piers. While the
existing site features would likely be impacted,
including the community amphitheater, it appears
that public access and experience can be largely
maintained (and likely enhanced). Improvements to
the City Pier are already planned as a future phase
of the Waterfront Transportation Improvement
Plan project, so this project could potentially tie
in nicely with those improvements on this site.
Entitlement for this site limits its development
options. The land, owned by the Department of
Natural Resources, has been leased by the City of
Port Angeles for several decades. This makes it
possible for the City to lead development on the
site or, alternatively, for Feiro (as current tenant)
to develop the site as a tenant -lease improvement.
Given the uncertainty of the City's ability to
lead the development, the scenario of Feiro as
developer/ landlord of this project was evaluated.
PROS OF SCENARIO ONE:
• existing saltwater system - potential
savings of permit time and cost
• site currently under development control
CONS OF SCENARIO ONE:
• underlying land lease renegotiation
required with City/ DNR
• smaller site limits future expansion/
other partnership opportunities
RISKS OF SCENARIO ONE:
• NOAA lease procurement process
• development timing tied to fundraising effort
WEST END PARK
..-- PORT OF
PORT ANGELES PIER
NEW BUILDING'``,)
SCENARIO TWO: OAK STREET PROPERTY
The Oak Street Property provides a unique
opportunity to situate the project within the
West End Park, adjacent to hundreds of feet
of new beach, creating what will surely be Port
J -21
13
Angeles' most exciting new public space. The site
provides ample space, and would accommodate
additional cultural and /or marine science based
partner facilities as part of a larger campus. The
adjacent park land is included in the next phase
of the Waterfront Transportation Improvement
Plan project, which is well into the design phase
and anticipates construction summer 2013. The
use of this highly visible site would likely boost
development at this end of town and kick -start
general economic momentum in the Downtown
core. With its civic intersection and connection to
the park, this site would boost the project's exposure
to the community and increase its recognition,
affording it the potential to become a true icon.
Provided Feiro could acquire the site through either
a gift or outright purchase, this scenario anticipates
engaging another partner in the development of the
facility to provide an alternative to the fundraising
burden and landlord responsibilities that Feiro
assumes in the first option. After evaluating pros
and cons of various targeted private (build -to -suit)
scenarios, it was determined that market forces as
well as NOAA procurement limitations make that
scenario unfeasible. Another option would be a
public agency development partner for the project.
It is assumed that the partners would each need to
contribute financially to the success of this scenario.
14
PROS OF SCENARIO TWO:
• simplified NOAA lease procurement process
likely allows NOAA to act as own leasing
agent (reducing overhead costs)
CONS OF SCENARIO TWO:
costs of property acquisition
• potentially complicated fundraising story for Feiro
(endowment campaign vs. capital campaign)
RISKS OF SCENARIO 2:
• negotiations with property owner
• negotiations with private partner
• negotiations with public development partner
• potential redesign of portion of West End Park
t
0
1
u
I 1 1
0
a_
LAJ
EacC
CD
Fawn-
cCt
LJ
CM
COD
laCC
W
CO CZ
tOCZ
N
Ce3
THAT CHAMPIONS MARINE LIFE AND C
ECONOMICS:
SCENARIOS ONE & TWO
Establishing solid economic assumptions is critical
to evaluating each of the two scenarios. Each option
has great implications for each partner: NOAA
must weigh procurement process requirements,
while Feiro faces mission decisions regarding
its willingness to be a landlord. While there are
certainly risks in any development project, the
team worked to establish realistic economic
models from which decisions could be made.
Recognizing that Scenario 1 is a more traditional
development where costs are managed by a current
project partner, it is easier to establish a more thorough
preliminary pro forma and a traditional surplus/ loss
projection. Scenario 2, with an outside partner as
the developer, is more appropriately evaluated as a
"Business Case ", where our team provides assumptions
and likely revenue projections for the new partner to
analyze and customize to their business assumptions.
There are some similar development cost
assumptions in either scenario, which we provided
to both control the quality of the project and to
ensure the comparison is on equal ground. Surveying
similar projects around the region, and assuming a
level of quality appropriate for a public or cultural
16
facility, the team proposes utilizing an average
construction cost model of $300 per square foot.
Also, based on surveys of other projects of similar
scale and complexity, the team suggests using a
soft -cost factor of X 1.5 (fifty percent) for permits,
fees, taxes, A/E fees, furniture, development costs,
and fundraising costs, (exclusive of site acquisition
and exhibit costs). For both scenarios, the
following baseline costs were assumed. See each
scenario description for additional information:
27,902 sf x $300 /sf = $8.4 million (construction cost)
x 1.5 (soft costs)
$12.6 project cost
The other assumptions that impacts both scenarios
are the operational and lease costs for the Conference
Center. A preliminary program was developed, but
a thorough market study will be required to finalize
the need and establish a detailed business plan for
the Center. To offset this unknown, though, both of
the scenarios could rely on Lodging Tax contributions
to cover the lease rate for the Conference Center
space so that this expense is not assigned to any
one particular partner. The assumption is that once
the facility is sized to meet the market needs, it
will generate the income necessary to operate it.
SCENARIO ONE
In this scenario, Feiro is the developer of the
project. The costs for planning and construction
are largely contingent on financing for portions
of the project deemed to have a public benefit.
Preliminary indications suggest that there are
a number of items that will slightly increase
construction costs at this site, including additional
foundation costs due to soil conditions, utility
relocation, and the replacement of portions of the
city boardwalk and amphitheater. These costs
have been factored into the analysis as follows:
This chart projects the cost of development overlaid
on the schedule (in six month increments) to major
funding need milestones. In this scenario, the first
six months include contributions by all three partners
to continue planning, analyzing, and establishing the
vision for this project. Moving forward, as the project
developer, Feiro funds the majority of design and
construction costs with contributions from the City
and OCNMS during construction. Looking forward
to occupancy, a lease rate begins for OCNMS and
the City begins contributing lodging tax funds.
In similar situations, we have seen successful
projects gain access to (through fundraising
or loans) portions of the funds as the project
progresses, so that fundraising, entitlement,
and design are all occurring simultaneously.
$450,000 additional construction
+ $70,000 utility relocation costs
$520,000 total
X 1.5 (soft costs)
$780,000 additional project costs
J - 25
17
SCENARIO TWO
In this scenario, a public or private partner is
brought in to serve as the developer of the project.
In order to determine the viability of this option
and to engage the development partner, the team
assembled a "Business Case" for the project that
CITY PIER: MILESTONES
PREDESIGN /,ENTITLEMENT-
.: ;
?c ®tom...
outlines expectations, defines partner contributions
including property acquisition and potential financial
support, and describes assumed tenant mix and
lease rates. Following are the assumptions made:
PROPERTY ACQUISITION:
The targeted private parcel for this scenario is
currently on the market. The proposal is for the site
to be acquired by Feiro (through outright purchase
or donation, refer to the Action Plan for additional
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
1231567691011121231567 B 910111212315678 910111212315678 B 10111212315678 BIB 1112
DESIGN /DOCUMENTATION
CQNSTRUCTION :& MOVEI
EXPENDITURE / MONTH
FEIRO
$500K $500K
°$80OK $200K
information). The site would be subdivided and a
portion of the site would be sold to the developer
for a nominal amount in exchange for a reduced rent
rate over the 20 -year lease term. The management
of the portion of the site owned by the Department
of Natural Resources, currently leased by the City
of Port Angeles and included in the planned West
End Park, is assumed to be shifted to the developing
agency. This portion of the site will also be evaluated
during design to determine if it is truly necessary
OAK STREET: MILESTONES
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 10 11 12 1 2 3 6 5 6 7 8 0 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 0 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 J 5 6 7 0 0 10 11 12
PREDESIGN / ENTITLEMENT
DESIGN I DOCUMENTATION OERN
CONSTRUCTION& MOVt -1N a`
EXPENDITURE / MONTH
,$$IpOK JIM
$50K41k
S� 50K
$1201( e201(
19
)ORTANGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: May 21, 2013
TO:
FROM:
CITY COUNCIL
Terry Gallagher, Police Chief
Ken Debuc, Fire Chief
Nathan West, Director of Community and Economic Development
Glenn A. Cutler, P.E., Director of Public Works & Utilities
Corey Delikat, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Wireless Mobile Data System, Project CL05 -2011 Final Acceptance
Summary: Capacity Provisioning, Inc., of Port Angeles, WA has completed the construction
contract for Project CL05 -2011, the Wireless Mobile Data System that was funded with a grant
provided by the Northwest Open Access Network under the Broadband Technologies
Opportunities Program. The work has been inspected and accepted as complete in the amount of
$2,705,087.83, including applicable taxes. The last payment of the retainage now being held will
be made, upon final acceptance, in the amount of $255,092.58.
Recommendation: Accept Project CL05 -2011, the Wireless Mobile Data System funded by
the Northwest Open Access Network with a grant from the Broadband Technologies
Opportunities Program, and authorize release of the final payment of $255,092.58.
Background /Analysis: On June 19, 2006, City Council incorporated the Wireless Technology
Plan as part of the City's annual Capital Facilities Plan for the Police and Fire Departments. In
early 2010, the City submitted a sub -grant application in cooperation with the Northwest Open
Access Network (NoaNet) under the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP).
The City's sub -grant included an initial system -level design within the City and the Lower Elwha
Klallam Tribe (LEKT), which was performed by the City's technical consultant Columbia
Telecommunication Corporation (CTC). This initial system -level design comprised a total of
240 wireless access points and 44 interconnections to the fiber optic network operated under the
Metropolitan Area Network Services Agreement. Communications equipment necessary for
vehicles was also included in the sub -grant application for the City (Police, Fire, and Public
Works and Utilities Departments), Fire Districts 2 and 3, Clallam County Sheriff, and the LEKT.
City Council approved a Wireless Mobile Data System (WMDS) Acquisition and Integration
Agreement (Agreement) with Capacity Provisioning, Inc. (CPI) using the BTOP grant as the
N. \CCOUNCIL \FINAL \Wireless Mobile Data System, Project CL05 -2011 Final Acceptance.docx
J - 28
May 21, 2013 City Council
Project CL05 -2011 Final Acceptance, Wireless Mobile Data System
Page 2
source of funds on December 13, 2011 on the recommendation of the Police Chief, the Fire
Chief, the Director of Community and Economic Development, and the Director of Public
Works & Utilities.
On July 17, 2012, City Council approved Amendment No. 1 in the amount of $48,422.27 for in-
car cameras for public safety, which was funded by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency. This component was later removed from the project scope at the mutual request of both
parties, and the funding authority was administratively de- obligated from the Agreement. The
reason this component was cancelled were concerns about the current cost sustainability of the
effort, and the expectation that prices for in -car cameras will be reduced in the near future.
Initial construction began on July 2, 2012. City Council approved previously planned changes as
Amendment #2 to the Agreement and authorized the commencement of the last construction
phase on September 4, 2012. This effort used $127,127.00 from a contingency fund that was
previously approved by City Council, which was also a part of the City's required cash match
under the BTOP grant.
The project was substantially completed on November 29, 2012 and physically completed on
March 8, 2013. The project has been inspected and determined to be complete. Project
management and final project inspection is being performed by CTC and City staff. A copy of
the City's final acceptance plan for the WMDS is provided. The final project inspection
included a review of the project's "As- Built" drawings as submitted by CPI.
Following the budget modifications, the final contracted amount for the NoaNet BTOP - related
components of the WMDS was $2,705,088.61. The final paid amount, including retainage and
applicable taxes, was $2,705,087.83. The following table summarizes project construction costs:
Initial Contract
Amendment #2
Total Contract
Final Cost
$2,577,922.50
$127,166.11
$2,705,088.61
$2,705,087.83
On May 14, 2013, the Utility Advisory Committee unanimously forwarded a favorable
recommendation that City Council accept Project CL05 -2011, the Wireless Mobile Data System
funded by the Northwest Open Access Network with a grant from the Broadband Technologies
Opportunities Program, and authorize release of the final payment of $255,092.58.
Attachment: Wireless Network Acceptance Plan
Port Angeles
Wireless Network Acceptance Plan
Rev 1.3 - (4 -1 -13)
I. Documentation
a. Map illustrating position of all Wireless Access Points (WAP) — [final]
i. PDF format
ii. Graphic (AutoCAD or other common)
b. Maps illustrating new fiber construction for this project— [final]
i. PDF format
ii. Graphic ( AutoCAD or other common)
c. Map illustrating location of Community Anchor Institutions (17) — [final]
d. Excel spreadsheet defining all pertinent aspects and characteristics of each access point
i. Draft submission dated in final form will be acceptable 1
ii. Expanded include specific access point information2
e. Schematic diagrams illustrating VLAN structuring for networks interconnecting to
wireless access points at the time of completion
f. Manufacture documentation associated with3:
i. InterMapper network management system
ii. Aruba wireless access hardware
iii. Antennas used by all wireless access equipment
1. WAP fixed antennas
a. Omni — 2.4 & 4.9 GHz
b. Directional — 5.8 GHz ( narrow and wide beam)
2. mobile antennas
a. 4.9 GHz
b. 2.4 GHz
c. Commercial wireless — 3 & 4 G
iv. InMotion hardware and software manuals
v. Backup power supplies
vi. Public network client access devices
vii. Client access equipment
1. 2.4 GHz ISP subscribers
2. 4.9 GHz mobile
3. 3/4G wireless cards
1 Per Kurt Lorentzen e-mail 3/28
2 Backhaul antenna model # and power supply if battery backup
3 Cut sheets, installation and operators manuals
J - 30
II. City inspection
a. On -site inspection of each wireless access point4
b. Field inspection of new fiber plant installed for the projects
c. Location installation of backup power supplies
d. Network assess available at 17 Community Anchor Institutions 6
111. System -level testing'
a. Verification of proper implementation of InterMapper network monitoring equipment
b. Documentation of primary backhaul Zink for each WAP
c. Data throughput test for each WAP
d. Failure alarms
e. Functionality of In Motion Network toggling
4 Completed with exception of new backhaul antenna
s Recheck in May
6 Using coverage maps
' Function verified Mar 19/20 to be reconfirmed May 2013
J - 31
BTOP- Community Anchor Institutions
City Hall - Court House -
Sheriff
321 E Fifth St
Port Angeles
WA
PA Fire Station
102 E 5th St
Port Angeles
WA
Landfill
3501 W 18th
Port Angeles
WA 1
1
Corp Yard - City Light
1703 S B St
Port Angeles
WA
WWTP
1509 Columbia
Port Angeles
WA
E street
1022 S E St
Port Angeles
WA
Senior Cntr
328 E 7th St
Port Angeles
WA
William Shore Pool
1901 W 4th St
Port Angeles
WA
Parks Mntc
3127 W 18th St
Port Angeles
WA
Cemetery Chapel
2700 S Milwaukee Dr.
Port Angeles
WA
Marine Terminal
2007 S 0 St
Port Angeles
WA
P.A.H.S.
304 E Park Ave
Port Angeles
WA
Scrivner PS
300 E Scrivner
Port Angeles
WA
CSO P.S. 1
5th St & N St
Port Angeles
WA
Wolverton Park
825 W 11th St
Port Angeles
WA
N Olympic Youth Cntr
201 W 1st St
Port Angeles
WA
Tribal Library
2851 Lower Elwha Rd
Port Angeles
WA
CITY OF
PORTINGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: MAY 21, 2013
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DAN MCKEEN, CITY MANAGER
WILLIAM BLOOR, CITY ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: HARBOR CLEANUP PROCESS
SUMMARY: The next step in the harbor cleanup process is approval of an Agreed Order and
Work Plan. These documents were negotiated by the PLP group and DOE, published for public
comment, and should now be in final form.
Recommendation: Approve the Agreed Order and Work Plan, and authorize the City
Manager to sign both, making minor modifications if necessary.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
For approximately a year, the City has been working with four other entities - Port, Nippon,
Georgia - Pacific, and Merrill & Ring - named by DOE, as potentially liable persons (PLP's) for
contamination in the Harbor.
Initially, the PLP group was an informal association. In April, the City Council approved a
Participation Agreement and Environmental Services Agreement. These agreements created a
formal structure for the PLP group to use to move toward a harbor cleanup.
Simultaneously, the PLP group was negotiating with DOE the terms of an Agreed Order (AO)
and Work Plan (WP). These are the documents by which the PLP group would commit to
prepare a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI /FS), which would guide the next
steps in a harbor cleanup.
PAGE 2
MAY 21, 2013
RE: MEMO TO COUNCIL RE: HARBOR CLEANUP PROCESS
The AO is a document between DOE on one side and the PLP group on the other. It has the
same effect as a court order and is legally enforceable. DOE could simply order the City, or any
of the PLPs, to perform the work. In this case, however, the PLP group negotiated with DOE the
terms and conditions of the Order, and so it is an agreed order. This document legally obligates
the City, and the other PLPs who sign it, to perform the work required in the Work Plan.
The Work Plan is a document that is attachment to the AO. The Work Plan is mostly a technical
document. It states in detail the type and quality of data that must be collected and the scientific
analysis that must be performed to produce the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI /
FS). Like the AO, the terms and provisions of the Work Plan have been developed through a
long, intense negotiation with DOE.
Negotiation of an AO was completed in April. Then, DOE published the AO for public
comment. The comment period has expired, and the AO and Work Plan are now ready for
consideration and action by the City Council.
In order for the City to continue its participation in the PLP Group, the City must approve the
AO and WP.
As discussed previously, there are benefits to the City from participation in the PLP group. They
include the economic advantage of dividing the costs and labor of an RI/FS among 4 entities, and
the assurance of being directly involved in the harbor cleanup process in order to better achieve
the City's goals in that process. Therefore, City staff recommends approval of the AO and WP,
and to authorize the City Manager to sign both, making minor modifications if necessary.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
In the Matter of Remedial Action by:
Port of Port Angeles
338 W. First Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Georgia - Pacific LLC
133 Peachtree Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30303
Nippon Paper Industries USA Co., Ltd.
P. O. Box 271
Port Angeles, WA 98362
City of Port Angeles
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Merrill & Ring
813 E. 8th Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
AGREED ORDER
No. DE 9781
TO: Jeffery K. Robb, Executive Director
Port of Port Angeles
338 W. First Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Traylor Champion, Vice President — Environmental Affairs
Georgia - Pacific LLC
133 Peachtree Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30303
Harold Norlund, Resident Mill Manager
Nippon Paper Industries USA Co., Ltd.
P. O. Box 271
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Dan McKeen, City Manager
City of Port Angeles
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Norm Schaaf, Vice President /Timberlands and Administration
Merrill & Ring
813 E. 8th Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 2 of 30
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION 4
II. JURISDICTION 4
III. PARTIES BOUND 4
IV. DEFINITIONS 5
V. FINDINGS OF FACT 6
VI. ECOLOGY DETERMINATIONS 10
VII. WORK TO BE PERFORMED 12
A. Remedial Investigation /Feasibility Study 13
B. Quarterly Progress Reports 15
C. Progress 15
VIII. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ORDER 16
A. Public Notice 16
B. Remedial Action Costs 16
C. Implementation of Remedial Action 17
D. Designated Project Coordinators 17
E. Performance 18
F. Access 19
G. Sampling, Data Submittal, and Availability 20
H. Public Participation 20
I. Retention of Records 22
J. Resolution of Disputes 22
K. Extension of Schedule 23
L. Amendment of Order 25
M. Endangerment 25
N. Reservation of Rights 26
J - 36
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 3 of 30
1
O. Transfer of Interest in Property 27
P. Compliance with Applicable Laws 27
Q. Indemnification 28
IX. SATISFACTION OF ORDER 29
X. ENFORCEMENT 29
EXHIBIT A. Site Diagram
EXHIBIT B. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan
EXHIBIT C. Schedule
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 4 of 30
I. INTRODUCTION
The mutual objective of the State of Washington, Department of Ecology (Ecology) and
potentially liable persons (PLPs) Port of Port Angeles, Georgia - Pacific LLC, Nippon Paper
Industries USA Co., Ltd., City of Port Angeles, and Merrill & Ring under this Agreed Order
(Order) is to provide for remedial action at a facility where there has been a release or threatened
release of hazardous substances. Ecology and the PLPs have the further mutual objective of
completing remedial action called for under this Order by January 2015. This Order requires the
PLPs to complete a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI /FS) for the Western Port
Angeles Harbor Site in accordance with the provisions specified in the Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan, attached to and incorporated in this Order as
Exhibit B (Work Plan). Ecology believes the actions required by this Order are in the public
interest.
II. JURISDICTION
This Agreed Order is issued pursuant to the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA),
RCW 70.105D.050(1).
III. PARTIES BOUND
This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon the Parties to this Order, their
successors and assigns. The undersigned representative of each party hereby certifies that he or
she is fully authorized to enter into this Order and to execute and legally bind such party to
comply with this Order. The PLPs agree to undertake all actions required by the terms and
conditions of this Order. No change in ownership or corporate status shall alter the PLPs'
responsibility under this Order. The PLPs shall provide a copy of this Order to all agents,
contractors, and subcontractors retained to perform work required by this Order, and shall ensure
that all work undertaken by such agents, contractors, and subcontractors complies with this
Order.
J - 38
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 5 of 30
IV. DEFINITIONS
Unless otherwise specified herein, the definitions set forth in Chapter 70.105D RCW and
Chapter 173 -340 WAC shall control the meanings of the terms in this Order.
A. Site: The Site is referred to as Western Port Angeles Harbor Site (Site), is
generally located in the western part of Port Angeles Harbor, is defined by the extent of
contamination caused by the release of hazardous substances at the Site, and will be further
identified and delineated as described in the Work Plan. Based upon factors currently known to
Ecology, the Site is more particularly described in the Site Diagram (Exhibit A). The Site
constitutes a Facility under RCW 70.105D.020(5).
B. Parties: Refers to the State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology), the
Port of Port Angeles (Port), Georgia - Pacific LLC (G -P), Nippon Paper Industries USA Co., Ltd.
(NPIUSA), City of Port Angeles (City), and Merrill & Ring (M &R).
C. Potentially Liable Person (PLP or collectively, PLPs): Refers to the Port, G -P,
NPIUSA, the City, and M &R.
D. Agreed Order or Order: Refers to this Order and each of the exhibits to this
Order. All exhibits are integral and enforceable parts of this Order. The terms "Agreed Order"
or "Order" shall include all exhibits to this Order.
E. Agency Review Draft: Refers to a draft of a deliverable prepared by the PLPs for
first review by Ecology.
J - 39
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 6 of 30
G. Public Review Draft: Refers to a revision of a deliverable that addresses and
incorporates the comments made by Ecology on the Agency Review Draft, and that the PLPs
propose to be issued for public review and comment, subject to Ecology's determination that the
document is ready for public review.
V. FINDINGS OF FACT
Ecology makes the following findings of fact, without any express or implied admissions
of such facts by the PLPs or any PLP:
A. Beginning in 2008, Ecology conducted an investigation at Port Angeles Harbor.
This investigation included sampling of marine sediment. The investigation reports, titled Port
Angeles Harbor Sediment Characterization Study, Sediment Investigation Report, December
2012; and Port Angeles Harbor Supplemental Data Evaluation to the Sediment Investigation
Report, Summary Report, December 2012, confirm that releases of hazardous substances have
occurred in western Port Angeles Harbor, including the lagoon area.
B. The Port is a municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Washington and
owns or formerly owned properties where Fibreboard Corporation and M &R operated facilities
and released hazardous substances that have become sources of contamination of western Port
Angeles Harbor. In addition, the Port owns and operates the Boat Haven marina where
hazardous substances have been identified. The Port also leases or has leased, and manages or
has managed under a Port Management Agreement, state -owned aquatic lands at the Site to
facilitate Port operations. The Port's lease agreements, and the terms of the Port Management
Agreement are documented in DNR Port Management Agreement No. 22- 080013 and Leases
No. HA -1878, HA -2047, and amendments, thereto.
J - 40
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 7 of 30
C. Through a series of merger or acquisition transactions, G -P is successor -in-
interest to the owner or operator of the paper mill facility located at 1805 Marine Drive, at the
time of the release or disposal of hazardous substances, as defined under MTCA. In 2000, G -P
acquired the Fort James Corporation. The Fort James Corporation was a successor corporation
to Crown Zellerbach and James River Corporation of Nevada. Crown Zellerbach or James River
Corporation owned or operated the facility from 1928 through 1988. Crown Zellerbach and
James River Corporation also leased aquatic lands to facilitate operations as documented in DNR
Leases HA -1406, H.A 1 692, H.A. 2057, and H.A. 2434.
Documentation reviewed by Ecology shows that a zinc hydrosulfite process was used in
G -P's predecessor's paper mill facility prior to 1977. The mechanical pulping process required
the use of biocides for slime control. Fiber - bearing waste and other process effluent from G -P's
predecessor's paper mill facilities were discharged and disposed through multiple outfalls
directly into the harbor and the lagoon until the late 1960s when the process effluent outfall was
moved outside of Ediz Hook. Other outfalls continued to discharge stormwater to the harbor and
the lagoon through the 1980s. These operations resulted in the release or disposal of hazardous
substances at the Site.
D. NPIUSA is the owner and operator of a paper mill facility located at 1805 Marine
Drive at the base of Ediz Hook in Port Angeles. NPIUSA's real property at this location
includes the lagoon which is connected by a channel to western Port Angeles Harbor. NPIUSA
also leases aquatic lands within western Port Angeles Harbor from the Washington State
Department of Natural Resources for its operations. DNR's lease agreements are documented in
DNR Leases No. 51- 032481, 20- 012614, 20- 012019, 22- 002615, 22- 002697, and 22- 077766.
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 8 of 30
E. Merrill & Ring was the owner and operator of a lumber mill facility located at
1608 Marine Drive near the base of Ediz Hook in Port Angeles from 1958 through 1988 on
property leased from the Port of Port Angeles. Merrill & Ring also owned and conducted
operations on the adjoining property formerly owned by Fibreboard from 1972 through 1988. In
addition, Merrill & Ring leased aquatic lands for its operations from the Washington State
Department of Natural Resource in Port Angeles Harbor adjacent to the former Merrill & Ring
mill from 1980 to 1990 and adjacent to the former Fibreboard property from 1974 to 1988.
Lease numbers include H.A. 2301.
Documentation reviewed by Ecology shows that M &R released stormwater from its
operations at the former Merrill & Ring facility directly to the harbor through four outfalls. In
addition, release of wood preservatives, including pentachlorophenol (PCP) has been
documented in the area of the former planer mill and dip tank at the former facility. These
operations resulted in the release or disposal of hazardous substances at the Site.
F. The City at times has operated eleven combined sewer overflow (CSO) discharge
points that discharged untreated wastewater and stormwater directly into Port Angeles Harbor
during periods of heavy rainfall. Through these CSO discharge points, the City conveyed
hazardous substances into Port Angeles Harbor. Four of these continue to operate.
Sampling conducted during stormwater permit applications in 1996, 2003, and 2010
detected metals and organic contaminants above Sediment Management Standards in some
sediment results near some of the CSO discharge points.
G. Fibreboard Corporation was the owner or operator of a paperboard plant located
at or near 1313 Marine Drive from 1927 through 1970. In addition, between 1937 and 1972,
Fibreboard leased and operated in harbor areas both contiguous with the Fibreboard plant site
and along Ediz Hook from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. Owens
J - 42
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 9 of 30
Corning acquired Fibreboard Corporation in 1997. Ecology is investigating whether Owens
Corning is the successor -in- interest to the Fibreboard Corporation.
Documentation reviewed by Ecology shows that the Fibreboard plant used both a ground
wood and sulfite pulping process and discharged wastes directly into the Harbor waters via five
outfalls. These operations resulted in the release or disposal of hazardous substances at the Site.
H. Historically, a number of mills in the area, including but not limited to Crown
Zellerbach and Fibreboard, operated hog fuel boilers that burned salt -laden wood as a portion of
the fuel source. Other mills, including earlier mills that predated the Merrill & Ring mill but
were located on the same property, operated hog fuel boilers or wood debris burners, which also
burned salt -laden wood as a portion of the fuel source. These operations resulted in the release
or disposal of hazardous substances at the Site.
I. Wood debris identified in Port Angeles Harbor includes logs, large wood pieces,
small wood pieces or chips, very fine wood particles and /or fibers, and pulp -like material.
Historically, various mills and timber- related industries have operated along the shoreline of Port
Angeles Harbor. These facilities have at one time or another transported and stored logs, wood
chips, and /or sawdust in nearshore areas or on barges in the harbor. Releases of wood debris
occurred during these operations. The western portion of Port Angeles Harbor was historically
utilized for extensive log rafting by a variety of entities, resulting in the release of wood debris in
the rafting areas. Additionally, releases of wood debris resulted from the operation of log dumps
by a variety of entities. Wood debris, in the form of very fine wood particles and /or fibers, was
released to the harbor in the process effluent from mills, including the Crown Zellerbach and
Fibreboard mills, resulting in wood debris layers at the Site.
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 10 of 30
J. Industrial facilities and properties along the western harbor shoreline, including
the locations of the former M &R mill (1608 Marine Drive), and Fiberboard mill (1313 Marine
Drive), the current location of the NPIUSA paper mill (1805 Marine Drive), as well as the
current and former locations of city CSO outfalls, appear to be, or to have been, suppliers of
contaminants, including metals and dioxin, to the western harbor. Areas of sediment
contamination in the nearshore create chemical plumes spreading throughout the western harbor.
K. The investigative reports listed in Section V.A identified areas of marine surface
and subsurface sediment that exceed applicable state criteria for protection of the environment
and preliminary levels estimated to be protective of human health on lands: 1) owned by the
PLPs or on which the PLPs conducted operations, or 2) on which hazardous substances
possessed or generated by the PLPs have come to be located or were disposed. Based on the
studies performed at the Site to date, this Site poses a threat to human health and /or the
environment.
VI. ECOLOGY DETERMINATIONS
A. Each PLP is potentially liable pursuant to RCW 70.105D.040 for the release of
hazardous substances at the Site, a "facility" as defined in RCW 70.105D.020(5). The PLPs are
or were "owners or operators ", as defined in RCW 70.105D.020(17), of a facility and /or
arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances at the facility.
B. The facility, known as the Western Port Angeles Harbor Site (Site), is defined by
the extent of contamination caused by the release of hazardous substances at the Site and will be
further identified and delineated as described in the Work Plan (Exhibit B). This Order requires
investigation of sediments and identification of ongoing upland sources of contamination that
have the potential to result in sediment recontamination at levels greater than prospective
J - 44
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 11 of 30
sediment cleanup standards. Any such upland sources identified under this Order will be
addressed under separate actions, agreements, permits or orders. Based upon all factors known
to Ecology, a "release" or "threatened release" of "hazardous substance(s)" as defined in RCW
70.105D.020(25) and RCW 70.105D.020(10), respectively, has occurred at the Site.
C. Based upon credible evidence, Ecology issued a PLP status letter to the Port dated
July 18, 2012, pursuant to RCW 70.105D.040, - .020(21) and WAC 173 - 340 -500. After
providing for notice and opportunity for comment, reviewing any comments submitted, and
concluding that credible evidence supported a finding of potential liability, Ecology issued a
determination that the Port is a PLP under RCW 70.105D.040 and notified the Port of this
determination by letter dated September 18, 2012.
D. Based upon credible evidence, Ecology issued a PLP status letter to G -P dated
August 6, 2012, pursuant to RCW 70.105D.040, - .020(21) and WAC 173 - 340 -500. After
providing for notice and opportunity for comment, reviewing any comments submitted, and
concluding that credible evidence supported a finding of potential liability, Ecology issued a
determination that G -P is a PLP under RCW 70.105D.040 and notified G -P of this determination
by letter dated September 18, 2012.
E. Based upon credible evidence, Ecology issued a PLP status letter to NPIUSA
dated August 6, 2012, pursuant to RCW 70.105D.040, - .020(21) and WAC 173- 340 -500. After
providing for notice and opportunity for comment, reviewing any comments submitted, and
concluding that credible evidence supported a finding of potential liability, Ecology issued a
determination that NPIUSA is a PLP under RCW 70.105D.040 and notified NPIUSA of this
determination by letter dated September 18, 2012.
J - 45
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 12 of 30
F. Based upon credible evidence, Ecology issued a PLP status letter to the City dated
August 6, 2012, pursuant to RCW 70.105D.040, - .020(21) and WAC 173 - 340 -500. After
providing for notice and opportunity for comment, reviewing any comments submitted, and
concluding that credible evidence supported a finding of potential liability, Ecology issued a
determination that the City is a PLP under RCW 70.105D.040 and notified the City of this
determination by letter dated September 18, 2012.
G. Based upon credible evidence, Ecology issued a PLP status letter to M &R dated
August 6, 2012, pursuant to RCW 70.105D.040, - .020(21) and WAC 173- 340 -500. After
providing for notice and opportunity for comment, reviewing any comments submitted, and
concluding that credible evidence supported a finding of potential liability, Ecology issued a
determination that M &R is a PLP under RCW 70.105D.040 and notified M &R of this
determination by letter dated September 18, 2012.
H. Pursuant to RCW 70.105D.030(1) and - .050(1), Ecology may require PLPs to
investigate or conduct other remedial actions with respect to any release or threatened release of
hazardous substances, whenever it believes such action to be in the public interest. Based on the
foregoing facts, Ecology believes the remedial actions required by this Order are in the public
interest.
VII. WORK TO BE PERFORMED
Based on the Findings of Fact and Ecology Determinations, it is hereby ordered that the
PLPs take the following remedial actions at the Site and that these actions be conducted in
accordance with Chapter 173 -340 and 173 -204 WAC unless otherwise specifically provided for
herein. Under this Order, the PLPs shall: A) implement the Remedial Investigation /Feasibility
Study Work Plan as described below and in Exhibit B of this Order; B) follow the schedule
J - 46
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 13 of 30
described in the Work Plan and in Exhibit C; and C) provide quarterly reports to Ecology. For
each draft of all deliverables, the PLPs shall incorporate all comments from Ecology into the
next draft of that deliverable. Each deliverable, once approved in writing by Ecology, becomes
an integral and enforceable part of this Order.
A. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Implement the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan according to the
schedule attached as Exhibit C to this Order, including the following elements as more fully
described in the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan (Exhibit B) and
summarized here:
Task 1 - Prepare and submit a Remedial Investigation Sampling and Analysis Plan
(SAP)
Develop a draft Remedial Investigation Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) including
procedures for Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and a Health and Safety Plan (HSP)
following the design outlined in the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan (Exhibit
B) and meeting the requirements of WAC 173- 340- 350(7)(c)(iv), WAC 173- 340 -810 and WAC
173- 340 -820. Submit the draft SAP for Ecology's review and approval. Revise and incorporate
Ecology's comments into the plan if requested by Ecology.
Task 2 — Conduct the Supplemental Data Collection
Perform the supplemental data collection outlined in the Remedial Investigation Work
Plan (Exhibit B) and further detailed in the SAP and HSP.
Task 3 — Prepare the Supplemental Data Collection Technical Memorandum
Prepare and submit a draft Supplemental Data Collection Technical Memorandum
summarizing the field work conducted, any deviations from the sampling design outlined in the
SAP and HSP, and the sampling results. Submit the draft Supplemental Data Collection
Technical Memorandum for Ecology's review and approval.
J - 47
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 14 of 30
Task 4 - Prepare and submit a Remedial Investigation /Feasibility Study Report
The PLPs shall prepare and submit a RI /FS: (1) using the investigation framework in the
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan attached (Exhibit B); (2) following the SAP
and HSP outlined in Task 1 and 2 above; (3) integrating additional data collected during the
implementation of the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan Supplemental Data
Collection in Task 3; (4) incorporation of Ecology comments on the Draft Supplemental Data
Collection Technical Memorandum prepared in Task 4; and (5) including available data and
information from previous studies in Port Angeles Harbor.
Task 4a — Agency Review Draft RI/FS
The PLPs shall submit an Agency Review Draft RI/FS. The Draft RI/FS shall
fully define the nature and extent of contamination pursuant to WAC 173 - 340 -350 for the
purpose of developing and evaluating cleanup actions for the Site. In evaluating cleanup
action alternatives, the PLPs shall follow the requirements of WAC 173- 340 -350 through
370.
Task 4b — EIM Data submittal
The PLPs shall submit all data collected for the RI /FS in both printed form and an
electronic form capable of being transferred into Ecology's data management system as
provided in WAC 173 - 340 - 840(5). This requirement for electronic submittal shall be
complete when Ecology confirms all data are properly submitted into EIM.
Task 4c — Public Review Draft RI/FS
The PLPs shall revise the Agency Review Draft RI/FS incorporating Ecology's
comments. The PLPs shall submit the revised document as the Public Review Draft
RI /FS for Ecology's review and approval, and for Ecology's determination that the
document is ready for public review.
J - 48
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 15 of 30
Task 4d —Draft Final RI /FS
The PLPs shall revise the Public Review Draft RI/FS incorporating revisions
deemed necessary by Ecology after public comment. The PLPs shall submit the revised
document as the Draft Final RI/FS for Ecology's review and approval.
B. Quarterly Progress Reports
During performance of this Order, the PLPs shall submit quarterly progress reports to
Ecology. Email submittals are sufficient. Progress reports shall discuss all work required under
this Order. The progress reports shall include the following information regarding the preceding
reporting period:
1. A description of the actions which have been taken to comply with the Agreed Order.
2. Summaries of sampling and testing reports and all other data reports received by the
PLPs.
3. Summaries of deviation from the approved work plans and an explanation of the PLPs'
position on whether the deviations constitute minor or substantial changes to the work, in
accordance with Section VIII.L (Amendment of Order).
4. Summaries of problems or anticipated problems in meeting the schedule or objectives set
forth in the Work to Be Performed and Work Plans.
5. Summaries of solutions developed and implemented or planned to address any actual or
anticipated problems or delays.
6. Changes in key personnel.
7. A description of work planned for the next reporting period.
C. Progress
If, at any time after the first exchange of comments on drafts, Ecology determines that
insufficient progress is being made in the preparation of any of the deliverables required by this
J - 49
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 16 of 30
Section, Ecology reserves its right to take action under WAC 173- 340 - 510(4) to complete and
issue the final deliverable.
VIII. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ORDER
A. Public Notice
RCW 70.105D.030(2)(a) requires that, at a minimum, this Order be subject to concurrent
public notice. Ecology shall be responsible for providing such public notice and reserves the
right to modify or withdraw any provisions of this Order should public comment disclose facts or
considerations which indicate to Ecology that this Order is inadequate or improper in any
respect.
B. Remedial Action Costs
The PLPs shall pay to Ecology costs incurred by Ecology pursuant to this Order and
consistent with WAC 173- 340 - 550(2). These costs shall include work performed by Ecology or
its contractors for, or on, the Site under Chapter 70.105D RCW, including remedial actions and
Order preparation, negotiation, oversight, and administration. These costs shall include work
performed both prior to and subsequent to the issuance of this Order. Ecology's costs shall
include costs of direct activities and support costs of direct activities as defined in WAC 173-
340- 550(2). Ecology has accumulated $76,571.38 in remedial action costs related to preparing
this Order and its exhibits for this facility as of January 31, 2013. Payment for this amount shall
be submitted within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Order. For all costs incurred
subsequent to January 31, 2013, the PLPs shall pay the required amount within thirty (30) days
of receiving from Ecology an itemized statement of costs that includes a summary of costs
incurred, an identification of involved staff, and the amount of time spent by involved staff
members on the project. A general statement of work performed will be provided upon request.
Itemized statements shall be prepared quarterly. Pursuant to WAC 173 - 340 - 550(4), failure to
J - 50
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 17 of 30
pay Ecology's costs within ninety (90) days of receipt of the itemized statement of costs will
result in interest charges at the rate of twelve percent (12 %) per annum, compounded monthly.
Ecology reserves the right to seek recovery of all remedial costs relating to the site for which the
PLPs may be liable.
In addition to other available relief, pursuant to RCW 19.16.500, Ecology may utilize a
collection agency and /or, pursuant to RCW 70.105D.055, file a lien against real property subject
to the remedial actions to recover unreimbursed remedial action costs.
C. Implementation of Remedial Action
If Ecology determines that the PLPs have failed without good cause to implement the
remedial actions under this Order, in whole or in part, Ecology may, after notice to the PLPs,
perform any or all portions of such remedial actions that remain incomplete. If Ecology
performs all or portions of the remedial actions because of the PLPs' failure to comply with its
obligations under this Order, the PLPs shall reimburse Ecology for the costs of doing such work
in accordance with Section VIII.B (Remedial Action Costs), provided that the PLPs are not
obligated under this Section to reimburse Ecology for costs incurred for work inconsistent with
or beyond the scope of this Order.
Except where necessary to abate an emergency situation, the PLPs shall not perform any
remedial actions at the Site outside those remedial actions required by this Order, unless Ecology
concurs, in writing, with such additional remedial actions.
D. Designated Project Coordinators
The project coordinator for Ecology is:
Connie Groven
Site Manager/Environmental Engineer
Department of Ecology
Southwest Regional Office /Toxic Cleanup Department
(360) 407 -6254
connie.groven(a�ecy.wa.gov
J - 51
1
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 18 of 30
The project coordinator for the PLPs is:
Allison Geiselbrecht
Floyd /Snider
(206) 292 -2078
allison .geiselbrecht @floydsnider.com
Each project coordinator shall be responsible for overseeing the implementation of this
Order. Ecology's project coordinator will be Ecology's designated representative for the Site.
To the maximum extent possible, communications between Ecology and the PLPs, and all
documents, including reports, approvals, and other correspondence concerning the activities
performed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Order shall be directed through the project
coordinators. The project coordinators may designate, in writing, working level staff contacts for
all or portions of the implementation of the work to be performed required by this Order.
Any party may change its respective project coordinator. Written notification shall be
given to the other party at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the change.
E. Performance
All geologic and hydrogeologic work performed pursuant to this Order shall be under the
supervision and direction of a geologist licensed in the State of Washington or under the direct
supervision of an engineer registered in the State of Washington, except as otherwise provided
for by Chapters 18.220 and 18.43 RCW.
All engineering work performed pursuant to this Order shall be under the direct
supervision of a professional engineer registered in the State of Washington, except as otherwise
provided for by RCW 18.43.130.
All construction work performed pursuant to this Order shall be under the direct
supervision of a professional engineer or a qualified technician under the direct supervision of a
professional engineer. The professional engineer must be registered in the State of Washington,
except as otherwise provided for by RCW 18.43.130.
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 19 of 30
Any documents submitted containing geologic, hydrologic or engineering work shall be
under the seal of an appropriately licensed professional as required by Chapter 18.220 RCW or
RCW 18.43.130.
The PLPs shall notify Ecology in writing of the identity of any engineer(s) and
geologist(s), contractor(s) and subcontractor(s), and others to be used in carrying out the terms of
this Order, in advance of their involvement at the Site.
F. Access
Ecology or any Ecology authorized representative shall have the full authority to enter
and freely move about all property within the Site that the PLPs either own, control, or have
access rights to at all reasonable times for the purposes of, inter alias inspecting records,
operation logs, and contracts related to the work being performed pursuant to this Order;
reviewing the PLPs' progress in carrying out the terms of this Order; conducting such tests or
collecting such samples as Ecology may deem necessary; using a camera, sound recording, or
other documentary type equipment to record work done pursuant to this Order; and verifying the
data submitted to Ecology by the PLPs. The PLPs shall make all reasonable efforts to secure
access rights for those properties within the Site not owned or controlled by the PLPs where
remedial activities or investigations will be performed pursuant to this Order. Ecology or any
Ecology authorized representative shall give reasonable notice before entering any Site property
owned or controlled by a PLP unless an emergency prevents such notice. All persons, including
Ecology or Ecology authorized representatives, who access the Site pursuant to this Section shall
comply with any applicable Health and Safety Plan(s). Ecology employees and their
representatives shall not be required to sign any liability release or waiver as a condition of Site
property access, but shall comply with workplace safety rules.
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 20 of 30
G. Sampling, Data Submittal, and Availability
With respect to the implementation of this Order, the PLPs shall make the results of all
sampling, laboratory reports, and /or test results generated by it or on its behalf available to
Ecology. Pursuant to WAC 173- 340 - 840(5), all sampling data shall be submitted to Ecology in
both printed and electronic formats in accordance with Section VII (Work to be Performed),
Ecology's Toxics Cleanup Program Policy 840 (Data Submittal Requirements), and /or any
subsequent procedures specified by Ecology for data submittal.
If requested by Ecology, the PLPs shall allow Ecology and /or its authorized
representative to take split or duplicate samples of any samples collected by the PLPs pursuant to
implementation of this Order. The PLPs shall notify Ecology seven (7) days in advance of any
sample collection or work activity at the Site. Ecology shall, upon request, allow the PLPs'
authorized representative to take split or duplicate samples of any samples collected by Ecology
pursuant to the implementation of this Order, provided that doing so does not interfere with
Ecology's sampling. Without limitation on Ecology's rights under Section VIII.F (Access),
Ecology shall notify the PLPs prior to any sample collection activity unless an emergency
prevents such notice.
In accordance with WAC 173- 340- 830(2)(a), all hazardous substance analyses shall be
conducted by a laboratory accredited under Chapter 173 -50 WAC for the specific analyses to be
conducted, unless otherwise approved by Ecology.
H. Public Participation
A Public Participation Plan is required for this Site. Ecology shall develop a Public
Participation Plan alone or in conjunction with the PLPs.
Ecology shall maintain the responsibility for public participation at the Site. However,
the PLPs shall cooperate with Ecology, and shall:
J - 54
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 21 of 30
1. If agreed to by Ecology, develop an appropriate mailing list, prepare drafts of
public notices and fact sheets at important stages of the remedial action, such as the submission
of work plans, remedial investigation /feasibility study reports. As appropriate, Ecology will edit,
finalize, and distribute such fact sheets and prepare and distribute public notices of Ecology's
presentations and meetings.
2. Notify Ecology's project coordinator prior to the preparation of all press releases
and fact sheets, and before major meetings with the interested public and local governments.
Likewise, Ecology shall notify the PLPs prior to the issuance of all press releases and fact sheets,
and before major meetings with the interested public and local governments. For all press
releases, fact sheets, meetings, and other outreach efforts by the PLPs that do not receive prior
Ecology approval, the PLPs shall clearly indicate to their audience that the press release, fact
sheet, meeting, or other outreach effort was not sponsored or endorsed by Ecology.
3. When requested by Ecology, participate in public presentations on the progress of
the remedial action at the Site. Participation may be through attendance at public meetings to
assist in answering questions or as a presenter.
4. When requested by Ecology, arrange and /or continue information repositories to
be located at the following locations:
a. Port Angeles Public Library
2210 South Peabody Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
b. Ecology's Southwest Regional Office
300 Desmond Drive SE
Lacey, WA 98503
At a minimum, copies of all public notices, fact sheets, and documents relating to public
comment periods shall be promptly placed in these repositories. A copy of all documents related
to this site shall be maintained in the repository at Ecology's Southwest Regional Office in
Lacey, Washington.
J - 55
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 22 of 30
I. Retention of Records
During the pendency of this Order, and for ten (10) years from the date of completion of
work performed pursuant to this Order, each PLP shall preserve all records, reports, documents,
and underlying data in its possession relevant to the implementation of this Order and shall insert
a similar record retention requirement into all contracts with project contractors and
subcontractors. Upon request of Ecology each PLP shall make all records available to Ecology
and allow access for review within a reasonable time. Nothing in this Order is intended by any
PLP to waive any rights it may have under applicable law to limit disclosure of documents
protected by the attorney work - product and /or the attorney - client privilege. If any PLP
withholds any requested record(s) based on an assertion of privilege, it shall provide Ecology
with a privilege log specifying the record(s) withheld and the applicable privilege(s). No actual
data collected on Site pursuant to this Order shall be considered privileged.
J. Resolution of Disputes
1. In the event a dispute arises as to an approval, disapproval, proposed change, or
other decision or action by Ecology's project coordinator, or an itemized billing statement under
Section VIII.B (Remedial Action Costs), the Parties shall utilize the dispute resolution procedure
set forth below.
a. Upon receipt of Ecology's project coordinator's written decision or the
itemized billing statement, the PLPs have fourteen (14) days within which to notify
Ecology's project coordinator in writing of its objection to the decision or itemized
statement.
b. The Parties' project coordinators shall then confer in an effort to resolve
the dispute. If the project coordinators cannot resolve the dispute within fourteen (14)
days, Ecology's project coordinator shall issue a written decision.
J - 56
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 23 of 30
c. The PLPs may then request regional management review of the decision.
This request shall be submitted in writing to the Southwest Region Toxics Cleanup
Section Manager within seven (7) days of receipt of Ecology's project coordinator's
written decision.
d. The Section Manager shall conduct a review of the dispute and shall
endeavor to issue a written decision regarding the dispute within thirty (30) days of the
PLPs' request for review. The Section Manager's decision shall be Ecology's final
decision on the disputed matter.
2. The Parties agree to only utilize the dispute resolution process in good faith and
agree to expedite, to the extent possible, the dispute resolution process whenever it is used.
3. Implementation of these dispute resolution procedures shall not provide a basis
for delay of any activities required in this Order, unless Ecology agrees in writing to a schedule
extension.
K. Extension of Schedule
1. An extension of schedule shall be granted only when a request for an extension is
submitted in a timely fashion, generally at least thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the
deadline for which the extension is requested, and good cause exists for granting the extension.
All extensions shall be requested in writing. The request shall specify:
a. The deadline that is sought to be extended;
b. The length of the extension sought;
c. The reason(s) for the extension; and
d. Any related deadline or schedule that would be affected if the extension
were granted.
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 24 of 30
2. The burden shall be on the PLPs to demonstrate to the satisfaction of Ecology that
the request for such extension has been submitted in a timely fashion and that good cause exists
for granting the extension. Good cause may include, but may not be limited to:
a. Circumstances beyond the reasonable control and despite the due
diligence of the PLPs including delays caused by unrelated third parties or Ecology, such
as (but not limited to) delays by Ecology in reviewing, approving, or modifying
documents submitted by the PLPs;
b. Acts of God, including fire, flood, blizzard, extreme temperatures, storm,
or other unavoidable casualty; or
c. Endangerment as described in Section VIII.M (Endangerment).
However, neither increased costs of performance of the terms of this Order nor changed
economic circumstances shall be considered circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the
PLPs.
3. Ecology shall act upon any written request for extension in a timely fashion.
Ecology shall give the PLPs written notification of any extensions granted pursuant to this Order.
A requested extension shall not be effective until approved by Ecology. Unless the extension is
a substantial change, it shall not be necessary to amend this Order pursuant to Section VIII.L
(Amendment of Order) when a schedule extension is granted.
4. An extension shall only be granted for such period of time as Ecology determines
is reasonable under the circumstances. Ecology may grant schedule extensions exceeding ninety
(90) days only as a result of:
a. Delays in the issuance of a necessary permit which was applied for in a
timely manner;
b. Other circumstances deemed exceptional or extraordinary by Ecology; or
c. Endangerment as described in Section VIII.M (Endangerment).
J - 58
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 25 of 30
L. Amendment of Order
The project coordinators may verbally agree to minor changes to the work to be
performed without formally amending this Order. Minor changes will be documented in writing
by Ecology within seven (7) days of verbal agreement.
Except as provided in Section VIII.N (Reservation of Rights), substantial changes to the
work to be performed shall require formal amendment of this Order. This Order may only be
formally amended by the written consent of Ecology and each PLP. The PLPs may submit a
written request for amendment to Ecology for approval. Ecology shall indicate its approval or
disapproval in writing and in a timely manner after the written request for amendment is
received. If the amendment to this Order represents a substantial change, Ecology will provide
public notice and opportunity to comment. Reasons for the disapproval of a proposed
amendment to this Order shall be stated in writing. If Ecology does not agree to a proposed
amendment, the disagreement may be addressed through the dispute resolution procedures
described in Section VIII.J (Resolution of Disputes).
M. Endangerment
In the event Ecology determines that any activity being performed at the Site under this
Order is creating or has the potential to create a danger to human health or the environment on or
surrounding the Site, Ecology may direct the PLPs to cease such activities for such period of
time as it deems necessary to abate the danger. The PLPs shall immediately comply with such
direction.
In the event the PLPs determine that any activity being performed at the Site under this
Order is creating or has the potential to create a danger to human health or the environment, the
PLPs may cease such activities. The PLPs shall notify Ecology's project coordinator as soon as
possible, but no later than twenty -four (24) hours after making such determination or ceasing
such activities. Upon Ecology's direction the PLPs shall provide Ecology with documentation of
J - 59
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 26 of 30
the basis for the determination or cessation of such activities. If Ecology disagrees with the
PLPs' cessation of activities, it may direct the PLPs to resume such activities.
If Ecology concurs with or orders a work stoppage pursuant to Section VIII.M
(Endangerment), the PLPs' obligations with respect to the ceased activities shall be suspended
until Ecology determines the danger is abated, and the time for performance of such activities, as
well as the time for any other work dependent upon such activities, shall be extended in
accordance with Section VIII.K (Extension of Schedule) for such period of time as Ecology
determines is reasonable under the circumstances.
Nothing in this Order shall limit the authority of Ecology, its employees, agents, or
contractors to take or require appropriate action in the event of an emergency.
N. Reservation of Rights
This Order is not a settlement under Chapter 70.105D RCW. Ecology's signature on this
Order in no way constitutes a covenant not to sue or a compromise of any of Ecology's rights or
authority. Ecology will not, however, bring an action against any PLP to recover remedial action
costs paid to and received by Ecology under this Order. In addition, Ecology will not take
additional enforcement actions against any PLP regarding remedial actions required by this
Order, provided the PLPs comply with this Order.
Ecology nevertheless reserves its rights under Chapter 70.105D RCW, including the right
to require additional or different remedial actions at the Site should it deem such actions
necessary to protect human health and the environment, and to issue orders requiring such
remedial actions. Ecology also reserves all rights regarding the injury to, destruction of, or loss
of natural resources resulting from the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at
the Site.
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 27 of 30
O. Transfer of Interest in Property
No voluntary conveyance or relinquishment of title, easement, leasehold, or other interest
in any portion of the Site shall be consummated by a PLP without provision for continued
implementation of all requirements of this Order and implementation of any remedial actions
found to be necessary as a result of this Order.
Prior to a Party's transfer of any interest in all or any portion of the Site, and during the
effective period of this Order, the Party shall provide a copy of this Order to any prospective
purchaser, lessee, transferee, assignee, or other successor in said interest; and, at least thirty (30)
days prior to any transfer, the Party shall notify Ecology of said transfer. Upon transfer of any
interest, the Party shall restrict uses and activities to those consistent with this Order and notify
all transferees of the restrictions on the use of the property.
P. Compliance with Applicable Laws
1. All actions carried out by the PLPs pursuant to this Order shall be done in
accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements, including requirements to
obtain necessary permits, except as provided in RCW 70.105D.090. At this time, no federal,
state or local requirements have been identified as being applicable to the actions required by this
Order.
2. Pursuant to RCW 70.105D.090(1), the PLPs are exempt from the procedural
requirements of Chapters 70.94, 70.95, 70.105, 77.55, 90.48, and 90.58 RCW and of any laws
requiring or authorizing local government permits or approvals. However, the PLPs shall
comply with the substantive requirements of such permits or approvals. At this time, no state or
local permits or approvals have been identified as being applicable but procedurally exempt
under this Section.
The PLPs have a continuing obligation to determine whether additional permits or
approvals addressed in RCW 70.105D.090(1) would otherwise be required for the remedial
J -61
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 28 of 30
action under this Order. In the event either Ecology or the PLPs determine that additional
permits or approvals addressed in RCW 70.105D.090(1) would otherwise be required for the
remedial action under this Order, it shall promptly notify the other party of its determination.
Ecology shall determine whether Ecology or the PLPs shall be responsible to contact the
appropriate state and /or local agencies. If Ecology so requires, the PLPs shall promptly consult
with the appropriate state and /or local agencies and provide Ecology with written documentation
from those agencies of the substantive requirements those agencies believe are applicable to the
remedial action. Ecology shall make the final determination on the additional substantive
requirements that must be met by the PLPs and on how the PLPs must meet those requirements.
Ecology shall inform the PLPs in writing of these requirements. Once established by Ecology,
the additional requirements shall be enforceable requirements of this Order. The PLPs shall not
begin or continue the remedial action potentially subject to the additional requirements until
Ecology makes its final determination.
3. Pursuant to RCW 70.105D.090(2), in the event Ecology determines that the
exemption from complying with the procedural requirements of the laws referenced in
RCW 70.105D.090(1) would result in the loss of approval from a federal agency that is
necessary for the State to administer any federal law, the exemption shall not apply and the PLPs
shall comply with both the procedural and substantive requirements of the laws referenced in
RCW 70.105D.090(1), including any requirements to obtain permits.
Q. Indemnification
To the extent authorized by law, each PLP agrees to indemnify and save and hold the
State of Washington, its employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims or causes of
action for death or injuries to persons or for loss or damage to property to the extent arising from
or on account of acts or omissions of that PLP its officers, employees, agents, or contractors in
entering into and implementing this Order. However, the PLPs shall not indemnify the State of
J - 62
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 29 of 30
Washington nor save nor hold its employees and agents harmless from any claims or causes of
action to the extent arising out of the negligent acts or omissions of the State of Washington, or
the employees or agents of the State, in entering into or implementing this Order.
IX. SATISFACTION OF ORDER
The provisions of this Order shall be deemed satisfied upon the PLPs' receipt of written
notification from Ecology that it has completed the remedial activity required by this Order, as
amended by any modifications, and that the PLPs have complied with all other provisions of this
Agreed Order.
X. ENFORCEMENT
Pursuant to RCW 70.105D.050, this Order may be enforced as follows:
A. The Attorney General may bring an action to enforce this Order in a state or
federal court.
B. The Attorney General may seek, by filing an action, if necessary, to recover
amounts spent by Ecology for investigative and remedial actions orders related to the Site.
C. A liable party who refuses, without sufficient cause, to comply with any term of
this Order, will be liable for:
a. Up to three (3) times the amount of any costs incurred by the State of
Washington as a result of its refusal to comply; and
b. Civil penalties of up to twenty -five thousand dollars ($25,000) per day for
each day it refuses to comply.
J - 63
Agreed Order No. DE 9781
Page 30 of 30
D. This Order is not appealable to the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board.
This Order may be reviewed only as provided under RCW 70.105D.060.
Effective date of this Order:
PORT OF PORT ANGELES
Jeffery K. Robb
Executive Director
338 W. First Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
(360) 457 -1138
GEORGIA - PACIFIC LLC
Traylor Champion
Vice President - Environmental Affairs
133 Peachtree Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30303
(404) 652-5054
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Dan McKeen
City Manager
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
(360) 417 -4500
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Rebecca S. Lawson, P.E., LHG
Section Manager
Toxics Cleanup Program
Southwest Regional Office
(360) 407 -6241
NIPPON PAPER INDUSTRIES USA
CO., LTD.
Harold Norlund
Resident Mill Manager
P. O. Box 271
Port Angeles, WA 98362
(360) 565 -7043
MERRILL & RING
Norm Schaaf
Vice President
813 E. 8th Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
(360) 452 -2367
J - 64
Exhibit A: General location of Western Port Angeles Harbor Site
J - 65
Western Port Angeles Harbor
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 1 -1
2.0 Site Description and History 2 -1
2.1 PRE - INDUSTRIAL HARBOR CONDITIONS 2 -1
2.2 WORK PLAN SCOPE 2 -1
2.3 HARBOR DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE 2 -1
2.4 HISTORICAL AND CURRENT SHORELINE FACILITIES 2 -1
2.4.1 Nippon Paper Industries USA Co., Ltd. (NPIUSA) (formerly
Daishowa America, James River, Crown Zellerbach, and
Washington Pulp and Paper 2 -1
2.4.2 Merrill & Ring Lumber Company (Formerly Port Angeles Forest
Products Inc.) 2 -2
2.4.3 Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation 2 -2
2.4.4 Port Operations 2 -2
2.4.5 City of Port Angeles Combined Sewer Overflows and
Stormwater 2 -2
2.4.6 Hog Fuel Boilers and Wood Debris Burners 2 -2
2.4.7 Wood Debris Releases 2 -3
2 5 CURRENT FACILITIES AND NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT HOLDERS 2 -3
2.6 LAND OWNERSHIP AND IN -WATER AQUATIC LEASE AREAS 2 -3
3.0 Summary of Existing Information 3 -1
3.1 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 3 -1
4.0 Remedial Investigation Approach and Data Quality Objectives 4 -1
4.1 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION APPROACH 4 -1
4.2 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODELS 4 -1
4.3 DATA COLLECTION OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN RATIONALE 4 -1
4.3.1 Evaluate Benthic Conditions 4 -2
4.3.2 Evaluate Risk to Human Health 4 -7
4.3.3 Evaluate Risks to Ecological Receptors 4 -9
4.3.4 Evaluate Ongoing Sources of Hazardous Substances to
Sediments 4 -11
5.0 Feasibility Study Approach 5 -1
5 1 DISPROPORTIONATE COST ANALYSIS 5 -1
5 2 DATA COLLECTION OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN RATIONALE 5 -2
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook\2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
JPa
Western Port Angeles Harbor
5 3 ADDITIONAL FS TREATABILITY TESTING 5 -3
6.0 Project Management and Schedule 6 -1
6.1 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 6 -1
6.2 DATA MANAGEMENT 6 -1
6 3 DELIVERABLES 6 -1
6.4 SCHEDULE 6 -2
7.0 References 7 -1
List of Tables
Table 1 Port Angeles Harbor Development History
Table 2 Active Waterfront NPDES Permits within the RI /FS Study Area
Table 3 Historical Surveys of Environmental Conditions in Port Angeles Harbor,
2002 — Present
Table 4 Proposed Locations and Rationale for Full Suite Bioassays and Associated
Chemical Analyses
Table 5 Proposed SPI Stations
Table 6 Proposed Bioaccumulation Stations
List of Figures
Figure 1 Historical Waterfront Operations Map 1910 -1929
Figure 2 Historical Waterfront Operations Map 1930 -1949
Figure 3 Historical Waterfront Operations Map 1950 -1964
Figure 4 Current Facilities
Figure 5 Leased Aquatic Parcels
Figure 6 Shoreline Parcel Ownership
Figure 7 EPA's (2006) Data Quality Objective Process
Figure 8 Decision Tree for Benthic Conditions in Western Port Angeles Harbor
Figure 9 Bioassay Sampling Locations
Figure 10 Proposed SPI and Bioassay Station Locations
Figure 11 Bioaccumulation Sampling Locations
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook\2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
j Pau-1
Western Port Angeles Harbor
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Acronym/
Abbreviation Definition
Agreed Order Agreed Order No. DE 9781
BHC Hexachlorocyclobenzene
City City of Port Angeles
cm Centimeter
COC Chemical of concern
CSL Cleanup screening level
CSM Conceptual site model
CSO Combined sewer overflow
DCA Disproportionate cost analysis
DO Dissolved oxygen
DQO Data quality objective
E &E Ecology and Environment, Inc.
Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology
EIM Environmental Information Management
FS Feasibility Study
Harbor Port Angeles Harbor
HASP Health and Safety Plan
HQ Hazard quotient
Integral Integral Consulting Inc.
MTCA Model Toxics Control Act
NOAEL No observable adverse effect level
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
OC Organic carbon
Port Port of Port Angeles
PCB Polychlorinated biphenyl
QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan
RI Remedial Investigation
RI /FS Remedial Investigation /Feasibility Study
SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan
SMS Sediment Management Standards
SPI Sediment profile images
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Fdes\Content Outlook\2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI/FS Work Plan
Western Port Angeles Harbor
Acronym/
Abbreviation Definition
SPME Solid phase microextraction
SQS Sediment Quality Standard
Strait Strait of Juan de Fuca
TEQ Toxic equivalency quotient
USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
WAC Washington Administrative Code
Work Plan Western Port Angeles Harbor Remedial Investigation /Feasibility Study Work
Plan
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
j° g
Western Port Angeles Harbor
1.0 Introduction
This Western Port Angeles Harbor Remedial Investigation /Feasibility Study (RI /FS) Work Plan
(Work Plan) has been prepared in accordance with Chapters 173 -340 and 173 -204 of the
Washington Administrative Code (WAC). The Western Port Angeles Harbor Group' shall
implement this Work Plan to satisfy requirements of Agreed Order No. DE 9781 (Agreed Order).
This Work Plan describes the tasks to be performed in the Western Port Angeles Harbor RI /FS,
including identification of existing data gaps and data collection to complete the Final RI /FS
report. Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) and the Western Port Angeles
Harbor Group have the mutual objective of completing the remedial action called for under the
Agreed Order by January 2015.
1 Consists of Port of Port Angeles (Port), Georgia- Pacific LLC, Nippon Paper Industries USA Co , Ltd (NPIUSA), City
of Port Angeles (City), and Merrill & Ring
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
P9em
Western Port Angeles Harbor
2.0 Site Description and History
2.1 PRE - INDUSTRIAL HARBOR CONDITIONS
Port Angeles Harbor (Harbor) lies in the shelter of Ediz Hook, located on the Washington
shoreline of the Strait of Juan de Fuca (Strait). As summarized in Cultural Resources Guidance
for United States Coast Guard Group Port Angeles, Ediz Hook, Port Angeles, Clallam County,
Washington (Larsen 2006), the spit developed in part as a delta of the Elwha River, along with
shoreline erosion of glacially derived sediments. The Harbor area enclosed by the spit is a
sediment depositional area (NewFields 2012). Erosion of soils from shoreline bluffs was a
significant sediment input to the Harbor prior to settlement and nearshore filling (Herrera 2011).
The Harbor naturally experiences periods of low dissolved oxygen (DO) in the water column,
with periodic DO readings at levels less than 6 milligrams per liter (mg /L). The seasonal
variations in DO within the Harbor mirror the seasonal variations in the Strait (FSM and Evans
2002).
2.2 WORK PLAN SCOPE
This Work Plan addresses sediments located below mean higher high water within the western
Port Angeles Harbor study area, located west of the Rayonier Study Area and south of the Ediz
Hook spit, except in areas where this tidal level is covered by riprap or bulkheads. In this case,
the Work Plan addresses sediments below the toe of the riprap slope or bulkhead. These
sediments have been impacted by a variety of historical operations including those described
below. The scope of work is defined in Section 4.0.
2.3 HARBOR DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE
The Harbor's industrial development began with sawmills and fish packing operations in the late
1800s. Table 1 summarizes by year the various significant shoreline or nearshore operations,
starting in 1911. Typical operations included saw mills, fish packing, bulk fuel facilities, pulp and
paper mills, and other wood processing - related operations. Other uses included the U.S. Coast
Guard Station, located at the tip of Ediz Hook, and marine shipping. Figures 1, 2, and 3 show
changes to the historical waterfront operations over time. In general, waterfront industrial
operations peaked in the 1950s and 1960s (Figure 3).
2.4 HISTORICAL AND CURRENT SHORELINE FACILITIES
As described in the Agreed Order, there have been several industrial facilities in the Harbor that
have been associated with historical releases of hazardous substances and /or wood debris to
sediments, based on the scale, nature of operations, and years of operation. Each of these
facilities is briefly summarized below.
2.4.1 Nippon Paper Industries USA Co., Ltd. (NPIUSA) (formerly Daishowa America,
James River, Crown Zellerbach, and Washington Pulp and Paper
NPIUSA became the owner and operator of a paper mill located at 1805 Marine Drive at the
base of Ediz Hook in 1988. NPIUSA's real property at this location includes a lagoon, which is
connected by a channel to western Port Angeles Harbor. NPIUSA also leases aquatic lands
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Fyge- 11
Western Port Angeles Harbor
within western Port Angeles Harbor from the Washington State Department of Natural
Resources for mill operations.
Prior owners of the paper mill, including Crown Zellerbach and James River Corporation of
Nevada, owned or operated the facility from approximately 1928 through 1988 and also leased
aquatic lands from the State of Washington to facilitate mill operations. From 1928 through the
late 1960s, process effluents, wood fiber, and stormwater were discharged from the paper mill
through multiple outfalls to the Harbor.
2.4.2 Merrill & Ring Lumber Company (Formerly Port Angeles Forest Products Inc.)
Merrill & Ring was the owner and operator of a lumber mill located at 1608 Marine Drive near
the base of Ediz Hook from 1958 through 1988 on property leased from the Port Merrill & Ring
also owned and conducted operations on adjoining fee -owned property, formerly owned by
Fibreboard, from 1972 through 1988. In addition, Merrill & Ring leased aquatic lands for its
operations from the State of Washington. Historical records indicate stormwater outfalls were
situated on the Merrill & Ring property adjacent to the Harbor.
2.4.3 Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation
Fibreboard and its predecessors were the operators of a paperboard plant located at or near
1313 Marine Drive from 1919 through 1970, which was sold in 1972. Fibreboard also operated
in areas of the Harbor both contiguous with the Fibreboard plant site and along Ediz Hook
leased from the State of Washington. Owens Corning acquired Fibreboard Corporation in 1997.
Fibreboard discharged pulp mill wastes and stormwater directly into the Harbor via five outfalls.
2.4.4 Port Operations
The Port owns or formerly owned properties where Fibreboard Corporation and Merrill &Ring
operated facilities. In addition, the Port owns and operates the Boat Haven marina. The Port
also leases or has leased, and manages or has managed under a Port Management
Agreement, state -owned aquatic lands in the Harbor to facilitate Port operations. The Port's
lease agreements, and the terms of the Port Management Agreement, are documented in
Washington State Department of Natural Resources Port Management Agreement No. 22-
080013 and Lease Nos. HA -1878 and HA -2047
2.4.5 City of Port Angeles Combined Sewer Overflows and Stormwater
The City, at times, has operated eleven combined sewer overflow (CSO) discharge points that
discharged untreated wastewater and stormwater directly into the Harbor during periods of
heavy rainfall. Through these CSO discharge points, the City conveyed hazardous substances
into the Harbor. Four of these continue to operate
Sampling conducted during stormwater permit applications in 1996, 2003, and 2010 detected
metals and organic contaminants at levels greater than Sediment Management Standards
(SMS) in some sediment results near some of the CSO discharge points.
2.4.6 Hog Fuel Boilers and Wood Debris Burners
Historically, a number of mills in the area, including but not limited to Crown Zellerbach and
Fibreboard, operated hog fuel boilers that burned salt -laden wood as a portion of the fuel
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook\2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Page -p2
Western Port Angeles Harbor
source. Other mills, including earlier mills that predated the Merrill & Ring mill but were located
on the same property, operated hog fuel boilers or wood debris burners, which also burned salt -
laden wood as a portion of the fuel source.
2.4.7 Wood Debris Releases
Wood debris identified in the Harbor includes logs, large wood pieces, small wood pieces or
chips, very fine wood particles and /or fibers, and pulp -like material. Historically, various mills
and timber - related industries have operated along the shoreline of the Harbor. These facilities
have at one time or another transported and stored logs, wood chips, and /or sawdust in
nearshore areas or on barges in the Harbor. Releases of wood debris occurred during these
operations. The western portion of the Harbor was historically utilized for extensive log rafting by
a variety of entities, resulting in the release of wood debris in the rafting areas. Additionally,
releases of wood debris resulted from the operation of log dumps by a variety of entities. Wood
debris, in the form of very fine wood particles and /or fibers, was released to the Harbor in the
process effluent from mills, including the Crown Zellerbach and Fibreboard mills, resulting in
wood debris layers at the site.
2.5 CURRENT FACILITIES AND NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
SYSTEM PERMIT HOLDERS
A number of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits are in effect
within the RI /FS study area and are listed in Table 2. Figure 4 shows the locations of these
facilities, which include several wood - related loading operations, boatyard - related operations,
and municipal discharges. Unlike the majority of historical operations listed in Table 1, these
current operations are regulated under the Clean Water Act, with monitoring for specific
analytes required as per their permit (Table 2).
2.6 LAND OWNERSHIP AND IN -WATER AQUATIC LEASE AREAS
As shown on Figure 5, subtidal aquatic land is owned and managed either by Washington State
Department of Natural Resources or by the Port under a Port Management Agreement. The
majority of aquatic land under active leases in the Harbor is leased to the Port. Nippon Paper
Industries USA Co., LLC (known as NPIUSA) also currently leases several aquatic parcels. The
remaining aquatic parcels are relatively small and leased by a number of entities including the
City and Foss Maritime. Active log rafting currently occurs at three locations in the western
harbor on parcels leased by the Port.
Ownership of shoreline parcels is dominated by the Port, and the federal government (e.g., the
U S. Coast Guard Station; Figure 6).
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files\Content Outtook\2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Fyqem
Western Port Angeles Harbor
3.0 Summary of Existing Information
3.1 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS
A number of investigations of the Harbor sediments have occurred beginning in the early 1970s.
The purpose of a RI /FS is to adequately characterize the current conditions of the site for the
purpose of developing and evaluating cleanup action alternatives and to evaluate those
alternatives to enable a cleanup action to be selected. For the purpose of the Agreed Order,
data from 2002 to present will be used in the RI /FS to document current environmental
conditions. Table 3 provides the surveys and the types of analyses conducted during this time
period. These data are mapped and discussed in Port Angeles Harbor Marine Environment
Screening Level Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment, Final Report (Ecology 2012b),
Port Angeles Harbor Sediment Characterization Study Sediment Investigation Report, Port
Angeles, Washington (Ecology 2012a), and Port Angeles Harbor Supplemental Data Evaluation
to the Sediment Investigation Report, Port Angeles, Washington (NewFields 2012).
C \Documents and Settings\tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content OutlookI2ElG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Ppge? n
Western Port Angeles Harbor
4.0 Remedial Investigation Approach and Data Quality Objectives
4.1 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION APPROACH
A Remedial Investigation (RI) will be prepared consistent with WAC Chapters 173 -340 and
173 -204 of WAC. As discussed in WAC 173 - 204 -550, a RI is intended to collect, develop, and
evaluate sufficient information regarding a site or sediment cleanup unit for Ecology to establish
sediment cleanup standards and inform selection of a cleanup action. The RI will include the
following:
® General site information
® Site conditions
IS Distributions of sediment contamination
NI Sediment transport mechanisms
Confirmed and suspected contaminant sources
Recontamination potential
• Natural resources and habitat
Human health and ecological risk assessment
Preliminary sediment cleanup levels
▪ Preliminary sediment management area (or cleanup unit) boundaries
As described further in Section 4.3, Data Quality Objectives 2 and 3, Ecology has already
performed a human health and ecological risk assessment. These will be incorporated into the
RI, and no additional risk assessment - related data collection is proposed. Ecology is developing
preliminary sediment cleanup objectives for the Harbor; these will form the basis for the
development of the Harbor sediment cleanup standards.
4.2 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODELS
Conceptual site models (CSMs) addressing contaminant sources, transport mechanisms,
exposure pathways and receptors for human and ecological receptors in the Harbor are
provided in Figures 3 -3 and 4 -1 of Port Angeles Harbor Marine Environment Screening Level
Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment, Final Report (Ecology 2012b). These CSMs
were used by Ecology to develop human health and ecological screening level risk
assessments. Informed by the previous Ecology work, the CSM for this RI /FS will be refined as
part of the remedial investigation process.
4.3 DATA COLLECTION OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN RATIONALE
As shown in Table 3, Western Port Angeles Harbor has been sampled extensively over the past
10 years. The available data constitute the majority of the data needed to prepare the RI /FS. A
final defined data collection effort is anticipated to fill remaining RI data gaps. This section
identifies the specific remaining data gaps and defines the RI /FS activities that will be performed
to address them.
C Documents and Settings\tp,erce COPA1Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Pige1
Western Port Angeles Harbor
A systematic planning process is a key step in developing successful sampling and analysis
programs to ensure the appropriate sampling, analyses, and data evaluations are conducted to
meet program objectives. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) Guidance on
Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objective Process (USEPA 2006) is used herein to
guide data collection to support development of the RI /FS. The Data Quality Objectives (DQO)
process is a tool to determine the type, quantity, and quality of data. It is a seven -step process
that establishes performance and acceptance criteria to ensure that data that are collected
support the goals of the RI /FS. The DQO process is shown graphically in Figure 7.
The following four 000s have been identified to complete the RI:
DQO 1: Evaluate benthic conditions
DQO 2: Evaluate risks to human health
DQO 3: Evaluate risks to ecological receptors
DQO 4: Evaluate ongoing sources of hazardous substances to sediments
4.3.1 Evaluate Benthic Conditions
The evaluation of benthic conditions encompasses the presence of chemicals of concern
(COCs) in surface sediments and the potential for associated biological impacts, as well as the
potential for wood debris to influence benthic habitat quality.
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8\01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Western Port Angeles Harbor
DQO 1: Evaluate Benthic Conditions
DQO Step
Description
STEP 1 •
Benthic conditions are described in 2012 documents (Ecology 2012b,
State the
NewFields 2012), including areas with exceedances of Sediment Quality
problem
Standards (SQS) and cleanup screening levels (CSLs). As noted in these
reports, performance of the echinoderm larval bioassay across the study area
was highly inconsistent, with widespread failures including in areas with an
absence of SMS chemical exceedances and wood debris, as well as in samples
collected from reference areas. Improved laboratory resuspension methods
using bivalve larvae were recently developed and accepted by Ecology and the
Dredged Material Management Program (DMMP) during the Sediment
Management Annual Review Meeting that address the potential for entrainment
of larvae by flocculent particulate material in tested sediments (Kendall et al.
2012). This potential laboratory artifact may have resulted in false positive
echinoderm test results in numerous samples collected from the Harbor,
particularly at locations with wood debris where there is a greater potential for
entrainment of larvae. However, there is currently no Ecology- accepted protocol
for addressing entrainment using the echinoderm larval bioassay. Previously
sampled stations with possible false positive echinoderm larval test results will
be retested using the Ecology- accepted bivalve larvae resuspension method to
provide more reliable confirmatory bioassay data for comparison with SMS
biological criteria (SQS and CSLs) as described below.
A number of samples collected in the inner harbor exceeded SQS or CSL
chemical criteria for one or more chemicals. Under the SMS, these samples
may undergo bioassay testing to determine whether those sediments are toxic
and should be considered for remedy evaluation in the Feasibility Study (FS). If
the bioassays pass under the SMS framework, then those areas do not require
consideration in the FS to address SMS chemicals.
Harbor sediments contain wood debris in many areas (Ecology 2012b,
NewFields 2012, SAIC 1999). Wood debris may affect benthic habitat.
Additional data, as described below, are needed to evaluate whether areas with
wood debris should be considered in the FS.
STEP 2:
Principal Study Questions
Identify the
goals of the
N Are SMS benthic criteria exceeded in the study area?
study
M What influence does wood debris have on benthic habitat?
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook\2EIG30J8101 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Pjaaef
Western Port Angeles Harbor
DQO 1: Evaluate Benthic Conditions
DQO Step
Description
STEP 3:
Existing Field Data /Reports
Identify the
information
inputs
Existing data are summarized in Table 3 of this Work Plan
New Data To Be Collected In The RI
Bivalve larval bioassays conducted using the Ecology- accepted
resuspension modified - endpoint protocol at stations west of the Rayonier
Study Area where the echinoderm larval bioassay previously exceeded
SQS criteria (potentially false positive test results due to larval
entrainment) during testing by Ecology and Environment, Inc. (E &E) in
2008 (Ecology 2012b)
Amphipod, larval, and polychaete bioassays at locations in Western Port
Angeles Harbor where one or more SQS or CSL chemical values were
exceeded; between some stations where SQS chemical values were
exceeded; or in specific areas lacking bioassay data
Porewater ammonia, porewater sulfides, and conventional analyses (i.e.,
total organic carbon, total volatile solids, sediment grain size, and total
solids) at all stations where bioassays are performed
SMS chemical analyses at bioassay stations where sediment chemical
data are not already available
Limited SMS chemical analyses at stations where some sediment
chemical data are available such that data will be available for all SMS
chemicals
Sediment profile images (SPI) and plan view images at a subset of the
stations sampled by Science Applications International Corporation in
1998 (SAIC 1999), at all stations sampled for bioassays, and at
representative locations to evaluate and delineate (to the extent
practicable) wood debris deposits
Benthic community data (i.e., abundance of polychaetes, mollusks, and
crustaceans) only if there are significant conflicting lines of evidence
regarding benthic conditions among chemical, bioassay, and SPI data
that need resolution for preparation of the FS (to be determined by
Ecology after consultation with the Western Port Angeles Harbor Group
following collection and analysis of other RI /FS data)
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
SettingslTemporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8 \O1 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Fjagett
Western Port Angeles Harbor
DQO 1: Evaluate Benthic Conditions
DQO Step
Description
STEP 4:
Geographic Area
Define the
E The study area for full suite bioassays and associated chemistry is
boundaries
of the study
Western Port Angeles Harbor.
The study area for retesting the larval bioassay and performing the SPI
survey is Western Port Angeles Harbor.
Timeframe
Historical data from 2002 to present.
Sampling to occur in June to optimize bioassay testing. This timing is
necessary due to seasonal concerns about the availability of healthy
spawning stock for the larval testing, along with safety considerations
(i.e., avoiding inclement weather conditions during the winter).
Benthic abundance analyses, if performed, would be a separate field
event
Sample Type
Surficial sediment (i.e., top 10 cm) will be collected and analyzed for
bioassays and associated chemical and conventional analyses.
SPI and plan view images.
STEP 5:
The analytic approach for assessing benthic conditions is provided as a
Develop the
flowchart in Figure 8 (benthic conditions). The proposed sediment chemical and
analytical
bioassay data will provide comprehensive information on current sediment
approach
quality conditions at stations that previously were not tested with bioassays and
at previously sampled stations where the echinoderm larval bioassay exceeded
SQS criteria due to possible false positive results due to larval entrainment. The
new bivalve larval resuspension test results will be used to reflect current
sediment quality conditions for making remedial management decisions. All
data will be obtained using Ecology- accepted methods and evaluated according
to the SMS (i.e., SMS chemical data will be compared with SQS and CSL
chemical criteria, and bioassays will be evaluated relative to SQS and CSL
bioassay criteria). Porewater ammonia and sulfides will be compared with
bioassay SQS and CSL failures to evaluate possible causes of toxicity.
The chemical data will also support the evaluation of potential ongoing sources
(DQO 4 [Evaluate Ongoing Sources of Hazardous Substances in Sediments]).
SPI images will be evaluated for the following qualitative metrics: apparent
redox potential discontinuity depth, infaunal successional stage, presence of
benthic invertebrates, presence and amount of wood debris, and sediment grain
size. Changes in these metrics from the SPI data collected in 1998 (SAIC 1999)
will be used to evaluate the benthic habitat and potential for habitat recovery.
These data will be used as lines -of- evidence to develop and evaluate remedial
alternatives in the FS
C \Documents and Settings\tperce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Fyne -tg
Western Port Angeles Harbor
DQO 1: Evaluate Benthic Conditions
DQO Step
Description
STEP 6*
Performance or acceptance criteria will be described in the Sampling and
Specify
Analysis Plan (SAP) /Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) that will be
performance
prepared following this Work Plan. The following quality control considerations
or
will be addressed:
acceptance
criteria
M Field quality control samples
Laboratory quality control
Data quality indicators for laboratory analyses (precision, accuracy,
representativeness, completeness, and comparability)
STEP 7:
Full Suite Bioassays
Develop the
Full suite bioassays (i.e., amphipod, larval, and
polychaete), porewater
ammonia and sulfides, black carbon, and conventional parameters will be
detailed plan
for obtaining
performed at the 20 locations shown on Figure 9. The rationale for each
data
station, as well as the SMS sediment chemical analyses associated with
each location, is provided in Table 4.
Larval Bioassay Retest
The bivalve larval resuspension bioassay, ammonia
porewater and
sulfides, black carbon, and conventional parameters, will be performed at
stations using the resuspension protocol for the larval bioassay. The
stations are shown on Figure 9 and include: EHO2A, FP01A, BAO1A,
IE03A, IE04A, IE06A, IE07A, IE09A, IE14A, IE15A, LAO2A, IHO2A,
IHO3A, IHO6A, MA01A, MA02A, MA05A, MA06A, BLO1A, BLO3A, BLO4A,
BLO6A, KPO1A, KPO2A, KPO5A, KPO6A, and CSO -006.
Sediment Profile Imaging
SPI with plan view photos will be performed at the stations shown on
Figure 10 and listed in Table 5. SPI images will be evaluated for apparent
redox potential discontinuity depth, infaunal successional stage, presence
of benthic invertebrates, presence and amount of wood debris, and grain
size.
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook\2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Fygedd
Western Port Angeles Harbor
4.3.2 Evaluate Risk to Human Health
Assessing risk to human health involves evaluation of data for various human exposure
pathways. A screening level human health risk assessment has already been completed for the
Harbor (Ecology 2012b) However, data describing background conditions are lacking.
DQO 2: Evaluate Risks to Human Health
DQO Step
Description
STEP 1:
State the
problem
A screening level human health assessment for the Harbor was performed by
E &E (Ecology 2012b; refer to Section 3.0) to address potential risks to human
health from exposure to bioaccumulative and SMS chemicals. Screening level
risk assessments use default assumptions and provide conservative estimates
of risk.
Potential exposures to chemicals in sediment, fish, and shellfish tissue were
evaluated for subsistence fishers, recreational fishers, residential users, and
recreational users. Ecology's threshold of 1 in 100,000 (1 x 10 "5) potential
excess cancer risks for multiple hazardous substances or pathways was
exceeded for the subsistence and recreational fisher receptors. Inorganic
arsenic, dioxin /furan toxic equivalency quotient (TEQ), PCBs, alpha -
hexachlorocyclobenzene (BHC), and carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (cPAHs) accounted for 58 percent, 23 percent, 11 percent,
4 percent, and 3 percent respectively, of the subsistence fisher excess cancer
risk (Figure 3 -5 of Ecology 2012b), although alpha -BHC risk was based on
elevated and variable detection limits. The extent to which alternative cleanup
remedies address unacceptable risks to human health and /or achieve
background concentrations will be used as lines -of- evidence in the evaluation of
remedial alternatives in the FS.
STEP 2:
Identify the
goals of the
study
Principal Study Questions
_ Are unacceptable risks to human health from bioaccumulative and SMS
chemicals present in Western Port Angeles Harbor?
Do the risks differ from background?
C \Documents and Settmgs\tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook\2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Western Port Angeles Harbor
DQO 2: Evaluate Risks to Human Health
DQO Step
Description
STEP 3:
Existing Field Data /Reports
Identify the
information
inputs
E Existing investigations are summarized in Table 3 of this Work Plan,
including the screening level human health risk assessment (Ecology
2012b).
Preliminary sediment cleanup objectives for the Harbor are under
development by Ecology.
New Data Needed for the RI /FS
Background values.
Under the current SMS regulations and accepted SMS rule revisions
effective on September 1, 2013, evaluation of remedial alternatives in the
FS considers background concentrations of chemicals that may pose
human health risks subject to the disproportionate cost analysis (DCA)
and other elements of the FS evaluation to ensure potential remedies are
practicable. Regional background concentrations represent local
concentrations influenced by broadly distributed non -point sources in the
region such as atmospheric deposition or storm water, but that are not
attributable to a specific source or release. Ecology intends to develop
regional background concentrations for specific chemicals within specific
geographic areas. Ecology will determine the appropriate sampling
design, statistical analyses, and analytical methods. Ecology will collect
and analyze these samples, perform the statistical analyses, and provide
final results.
However, in the event that Ecology's derivation of Harbor regional
background values will not be completed in time to meet the Agreed
Order schedule, the RI /FS will use the following approach.
o If Ecology indicates to the Western Port Angeles Harbor Group
by June 30, 2013 that it will provide regional background levels
for comparative purposes to the Harbor prior to November 1,
2013, these regional background levels will be used in the RI /FS.
o If Ecology does not develop definitive plans by June 30, 2013 to
provide Port Angeles- specific regional background levels prior to
November 1, 2013, the Western Port Angeles Harbor Group and
Ecology will work cooperatively on this issue between July and
November 2013 for these numbers to be input into the RI /FS
process.
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Western Port Angeles Harbor
DQO 2: Evaluate Risks to Human Health
DQO Step
Description
STEP 4:
Define the
boundaries
of the study
Geographic Area
M The study area for the assessment of unacceptable risks to human health
due to bioaccumulative and SMS chemicals is Western Port Angeles
Harbor
Timeframe
Historical data from 2002 to present.
Sample Type
Regional background sediment concentrations to be determined by
Ecology's sampling design. No new data will be collected by the Western
Port Angeles Harbor Group to address this DQO.
STEP 5:
Develop the
analytical
approach
The screening level human health risk assessment will be used along with
background information as lines -of- evidence in the evaluation of remedial
alternatives in the FS.
STEP 6:
Specify
performance
or
acceptance
criteria
Regional background sediment concentrations to be determined by Ecology's
sampling design. No additional new data will be collected by the Western Port
Angeles Harbor Group to address this DQO because adequate data exist to
evaluate the potential for unacceptable human health risks.
STEP 7:
Develop the
detailed plan
for obtaining
data
No new data will be collected by the Western Port Angeles Harbor Group to
address this DQO. Adequate data exist to evaluate the potential for
unacceptable human health risks
4.3.3 Evaluate Risks to Ecological Receptors
Assessing risk to ecological receptors involves evaluation of data for various receptors and
pathways. A screening level ecological risk assessment has already been completed for the
Harbor (Ecology 2012b)
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook\2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Ppaeifil
Western Port Angeles Harbor
DQO 3: Evaluate Risks to Ecological Receptors
DQO Step
Description
STEP 1:
State the
problem
A screening level ecological risk assessment for the Harbor was performed
(Ecology 2012b; refer to Section 4) to address potential risks from exposure to
bioaccumulative and SMS chemicals. Screening level risk assessments use
default assumptions and provide conservative estimates of risk.
Risks to the following receptor groups were evaluated: marine plants and
macroalgae, benthic invertebrates, fish, and wildlife. The following conclusions
were developed:
Marine plants and macroalgae. The presence of wood debris in some
nearshore areas may have compromised the ability of the Harbor to
support marine plants and macroalgae.
_ Benthic invertebrates. Refer to DQO 1.
Fish. The risk assessment considered 10 chemicals found in fish tissue.
Arsenic in rock sole was the only chemical to exceed a tissue residue
risk -based concentration. Ecology concluded "fish in Port Angeles
Harbor are unlikely to be adversely affected by current levels of most
contaminants, except perhaps by arsenic."
Wildlife. Six wildlife species were evaluated: brant, double- crested
cormorant, greater scaup, harbor seal, raccoon, and bald eagle. No
unacceptable risks were found for brant, bald eagle, double- crested
cormorant, and the greater scaup. For the raccoon, a hazard quotient
(HQ) of 1 based on the no observable adverse effect level (NOAEL) was
exceeded for arsenic, while the HQ lowest observed adverse effect level
(LOAEL) was not exceeded; an HQ -NOAEL greater than 1.0 "doesn't
necessarily indicate adverse effect." For the harbor seal, an HQ -NOAEL
greater than 1.0 was observed but was based on an elevated detection
limits. Ecology concluded "Overall, it seems that no chemicals pose an
actual risk to harbor seals foraging in Port Angeles Harbor."
Overall, the study concluded that wood debris (refer to DQO 1) appeared to be
the most significant stressor to ecological receptors in the Harbor.
STEP 2•
Identify the
goals of the
study
Principal Study Question
Are unacceptable risks to ecological receptors present in Western Port
Angeles Harbor?
STEP 3:
Identify the
information
inputs
Existing Field Data /Reports
a Existing data are summarized in Table 3 this Work Plan, including the
screening level ecological risk assessment prepared by E &E (Ecology
2012b).
Preliminary screening levels for the Harbor are under development by
Ecology.
New Data To Be Collected In The RI
No new data will be collected by the Western Port Angeles Harbor
Group to address this DQO.
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook\2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FtNAL
RI /FS Work Plan
PF Q81i
Western Port Angeles Harbor
DQO 3: Evaluate Risks to Ecological Receptors
DQO Step
Description
STEP 4.
Define the
boundaries
of the study
Geographic Area
The study area for the assessment of unacceptable risks to ecological
receptors is Western Port Angeles Harbor.
Timeframe
Historical data from 2002 to present.
Sample Type
No new data will be collected by the Western Port Angeles Harbor Group
to address this DQO.
STEP 5:
Develop the
analytical
approach
Based on results of the ecological risk assessment, lines -of- evidence related to
ecological risk that will be evaluated in the FS will be limited to those described in
DQO 1.
STEP 6:
Specify
performance
or
acceptance
criteria
New data collected by the Western Port Angeles Harbor Group as part of
DQO 1 will be used to address DQO 3.
STEP 7:
Develop the
detailed plan
for obtaining
data
New data collected by the Western Port Angeles Harbor Group as part of
DQO 1 will be used to address DQO 3.
4.3.4 Evaluate Ongoing Sources of Hazardous Substances to Sediments
A key objective of the RI /FS is to identify ongoing sources that have the potential to result in
sediment recontamination at levels greater than prospective sediment cleanup standards.
Source control assessments to be performed in the RI /FS will involve evaluation of surface
sediment quality between mean higher high water and the deep subtidal zone in the Western
Port Angeles Harbor study area, except in areas where this tidal level is covered by riprap or
bulkheads, to identify areas that may be influenced by ongoing sources of hazardous
substances. Consistent with the SMS requirements, as revised, Ecology will use this information
along with its Water Quality Program and Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) upland cleanup
authorities to ensure the long -term success of the sediment cleanup efforts Adequate source
controls to prevent recontamination must be in place prior to selection and implementation of a
final sediment remedial action, which is necessary to ensure that recontamination of remediated
sediments, does not occur and natural recovery of the remaining sediments continues.
The Western Port Angeles Harbor Group will evaluate spatial gradients of COCs in surface
sediments This evaluation will focus on areas that exceed concentration thresholds based on
sediment cleanup standards and remediation levels as approved by Ecology. Areas where
surface sediments contain elevated COC concentrations may indicate an ongoing source. For
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Pale °816
Western Port Angeles Harbor
these areas, potential sources (e.g., upland activities, overwater operations, upland soil /bank
erosion, spills, stormwater, creeks, and NPDES permitted outfalls) to those areas will be
identified. Aerial deposition from global sources of persistent bioaccumulative compounds such
as dioxins /furans will also be considered.
If the source evaluation suggests the presence of one or more active sources, Ecology will use
state regulatory authorities (outside of the RI /FS Agreed Order) to follow up with the appropriate
parties to control those sources. Ecology and the Western Port Angeles Harbor Group will work
cooperatively to coordinate the timing of source control actions and sediment remedial actions
to ensure sources are adequately controlled before sediment remediation occurs.
DQO 4: Evaluate Ongoing Sources of Hazardous Substances to Sediments
DQO Step
Description
STEP 1:
State the
problem
The Harbor sediments have received hazardous substance releases from a
variety of sources since commercial /industrial operations began, including
upland, in- water, and over -water operations; spills; leaks; discharge of
stormwater, sewage, and wastewater; nearshore burning; and direct discharge.
Historical releases were of greater magnitude than ongoing sources, as
evidenced by the higher subsurface chemical concentrations in many areas of
the Harbor (refer to Figures 5.4 -1 and 5.4 -2 of Ecology 2012b).
The RI /FS will identify ongoing sources that have the potential to result in
sediment recontamination.
STEP 2:
Identify the
goals of the
study
Principal Study Question:
_ Would ongoing sources of hazardous substances pose a recontamination
risk to post - remedial sediments in Western Port Angeles Harbor?
STEP 3:
Identify the
information
inputs
Existing Field Data /Reports
Existing investigations are listed in Table 3 of this Work Plan.
ffi Additional data to be considered include available water quality
information for stormwater and creek discharges.
Bank conditions (presence /absence of riprap, exposed soils, intertidal,
etc.) and available bank soil chemical information will be considered.
Nature of nearshore and overwater operations — loading /unloading,
materials handled, release potential, etc.
Atmospheric deposition studies for persistent bioaccumulatives.
New Data To Be Collected In The RI
Surface sediment chemical data collected as of the DQO 1
part
Puget Sound Ecosystem Monitoring Program surface sediment chemical
data collected from Western Port Angeles Harbor may also be
considered, if available as a final, validated data package by November
2013
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Pafge ��
Western Port Angeles Harbor
DQO 4: Evaluate Ongoing Sources of Hazardous Substances to Sediments
DQO Step
Description
STEP 4:
Geographic Area
Define the
M The source evaluation process will encompass surface sediments within
boundaries
Western Port Angeles Harbor —if surface sediments exceed sediment
of the study
cleanup standards or remediation levels developed in the RI /FS process,
pathways to and adjacent to that area will be considered.
Pathways to be considered include upland activities, nearshore bank soil
erosion, direct discharges from overwater operations, spills, stormwater,
creeks, and NPDES - permitted ouffalls.
Timeframe
Surface sediment chemical data from 2002 to present to identify potential
source areas. Other data may be used to evaluate changes in sediment
chemical concentrations over time.
Sample Type
Existing surface sediments, soil, groundwater (if non - aqueous phase
liquid present in nearshore areas), and water quality data.
C \Documents and Settings\tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Pape /31
Western Port Angeles Harbor
DQO 4: Evaluate Ongoing Sources of Hazardous Substances to Sediments
DQO Step
Description
STEP 5:
Surface sediment areas where chemical concentrations exceed
Develop the
thresholds developed for sediment cleanup standards or remediation
analytical
levels will be delineated These will be considered source evaluation
approach
areas of concern.
If subsurface data are available in or near a source evaluation area, those
data will be reviewed to determine if there is a trend of decreasing
concentrations of the COC in newer sediment; such a trend would
indicate a historical rather than an ongoing source.
Potential ongoing sources and pathways to and immediately adjacent to
source evaluation areas of concern will be identified using the following
lines of evidence:
o Nature of nearshore operation and potential for COCs to be
released to the source area of concern.
o The COCs present in source area of concern sediments
compared with potential nearby sources.
o Water quality data, if available, for stormwater and creek
discharges to the source area of concern.
o If exposed shoreline soils are present and erodible, available soil
chemical concentration data will be considered. If no data are
available, fill history may be considered.
o If subsurface sediment data are available in or near a source
evaluation area, those data will be reviewed to determine if there
is a trend of decreasing chemical concentrations in newer
sediment; such a trend would indicate a historical rather than an
ongoing source.
o If non - aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) is present in nearshore
area(s), groundwater quality may be considered.
For each source evaluation area of concern, potential sources and pathways
will be classified either as a potential concern and flagged for follow -up by
Ecology, or as unlikely to pose a recontamination risk. Simplified fate and
transport modeling may be warranted to improve the understanding of
recontamination risk. If insufficient data are available to make a
recommendation, the pathway will be considered a data gap and flagged for
follow -up by Ecology
STEP 6:
For new data collected, refer to DQO 1. For other media (stormwater, water
Specify
performance
quality, soils, atmospheric deposition) not sampled as part of this Work Plan,
professional judgment will be used. Preference will be given to peer- reviewed
or
acceptance
criteria
studies and validated data.
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlookt2EIG30J8101 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Page 4818
Western Port Angeles Harbor
DQO 4: Evaluate Ongoing Sources of Hazardous Substances to Sediments
DQO Step
Description
STEP 7:
Develop the
detailed plan
for obtaining
data
Refer to DQO 1 for collection of new sediment data.
Data from other media will be compiled from available sources, including peer -
reviewed literature, available upland reports, and Ecology's Water Quality
program.
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
FdestContent Outlookt2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Pae 'big
Western Port Angeles Harbor
5.0 Feasibility Study Approach
Consistent with SMS requirements described in WAC 173 -204, as amended and with
requirements of WAC 173 -340, an FS will be prepared including collection, development, and
evaluation of information to enable consideration of sediment cleanup alternatives and selection
of a site - specific sediment cleanup standard to inform the Cleanup Action Plan. The FS will
include an evaluation of alternative cleanup actions that protect human health and the
environment by eliminating, reducing, or otherwise controlling risks posed through each
exposure pathway and migration route of concern identified in the RI. The number and types of
alternatives to be evaluated will take into account the characteristics and complexity of Western
Port Angeles Harbor.
The cleanup alternatives may include establishment of sediment cleanup units, as defined in
WAC 173 -204, as amended, with cleanup alternatives developed based on site physical
characteristics and complexity, and in consideration of cost, technical feasibility, and net
environmental impact. The FS will also include a MTCA DCA.
The FS will consider multiple lines of evidence, described further below, which will include:
NI Distribution of bioassay test failures and related chemical concentrations and wood
debris
Ili Distribution of bioaccumulative compounds in sediment, including organic carbon
and /or black carbon normalized concentrations, and comparison of regional
background concentrations with those distributions
® Bioaccumulation data for dioxin /furan and PCB congeners in parallel with porewater
testing data as measured by solid phase microextraction (SPME) across a gradient
of PCB and dioxin /furan concentrations to identify areas where sediments may be
relatively more or less likely to result in bioaccumulation
Ell Multiple measures of benthic habitat derived from SPI images and comparison of
those images to images taken in 1998 (SAIC 1999)
Additionally, treatability testing with granulated activated carbon will be performed at two
locations to measure the effect of activated carbon addition on porewater concentrations of PCB
and dioxin /furan congeners and the bioaccumulation of these chemicals by test organisms.
Overall, these analyses and weight of evidence approach are performed to facilitate
prioritization of areas for remedial actions, and /or consideration of remedial technologies.
5.1 DISPROPORTIONATE COST ANALYSIS
The MTCA DCA described in WAC 173 - 340- 360(3)(e) will be used in the FS to evaluate which
of the alternatives evaluated are protective to the maximum extent practicable. This analysis will
involve comparing the costs and benefits of alternatives whose incremental costs are not
disproportionate to the incremental benefits. The evaluation criteria for the DCA are specified in
WAC 173 - 340- 360(3)(f), and include protectiveness, permanence, cost, long -term effectiveness,
management of short-term risks, implementability, and consideration of public concerns.
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Ou ook\2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Pjaegd
Western Port Angeles Harbor
5.2 DATA COLLECTION OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN RATIONALE
Similar to the RI data gaps discussed in Section 4.0, the extensive data collected over the last
10 years constitute the data necessary to complete the FS. However, a focused data collection
effort is proposed to provide additional lines of evidence to develop and evaluate remedial
alternatives, and is described in this section following the DQO process described in
Section 4.2. These new data, in combination with existing data, are sufficient to complete
the FS.
One DQO has been identified to supplement the FS approach for Western Port Angeles Harbor:
DQO 5: Prioritization of Sediment Areas to Address Potential Bioaccumulation
Exposures
DQO 5: Prioritization of Sediment Areas to
Address Potential Bioaccumulation Exposures
DQO Step
Description
STEP 1:
State the
problem
As discussed in DQO 2, the extent to which alternative cleanup remedies
address unacceptable risks to human health and /or achieve background
concentrations will be used as lines -of- evidence in the evaluation of remedial
alternatives in the FS. Information on the bioavailability of COCs that drive risk
to human health will help focus the FS on high priority areas and contribute to
the lines -of- evidence evaluation.
STEP 2:
Identify the
goals of the
study
Principal Study Questions
E Are there sediment areas of Western Port Angeles Harbor exceeding
background levels that are associated with relatively higher potential for
bioaccumulation to occur?
STEP 3:
Identify the
information
inputs
Existing Field Data /Reports
Existing data on dry weight and organic carbon (OC) normalized
sediment PCB and dioxin /furan TEQ concentrations, along with tissue
concentrations, are summarized in the aforementioned reports (Ecology
2012b, NewFields 2012).
New Data To Be Collected In The RI
. Additional data will be collected to further inform the weight -of- evidence
FS evaluation approach, including:
o Black carbon (additionally, black carbon will be collected at all
bioassay stations discussed in DQO 1)
o Tissue concentrations of PCB and dioxin congeners derived via
laboratory bioaccumulation testing.
o PCB and dioxin /furan congener sediment data.
o Sediment grain size, total organic carbon, total solids, and total
volatile solids
o Porewater concentrations of PCB and dioxin congeners derived
via SPME.
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Fyaegi
Western Port Angeles Harbor
DQO 5: Prioritization of Sediment Areas to
Address Potential Bioaccumulation Exposures
DQO Step
Description
STEP 4:
Define the
boundaries
of the study
Geographic Area
_ The study area for the assessment of unacceptable risks to human health
due to bioaccumulative chemicals is Western Port Angeles Harbor.
Timeframe
Historical data from 2002 to present.
Sampling to occur in June concurrent with bioassay testing.
Sample Type
Surficial sediment (i.e., top 10 cm) will be collected and analyzed for
sequestering agents (e.g., black carbon), bioaccumulation, and porewater
analyses via SPME.
STEP 5:
Develop the
analytical
approach
Dry weight and QC- normalized sediment concentrations of PCBs and
dioxins /furans, black carbon concentrations, tissue concentrations of PCBs and
dioxins /furans derived through laboratory bioaccumulation testing, and
porewater concentrations of PCBs and dioxin /furans derived via SPME devices,
along with comparisons of existing Western Port Angeles Harbor and
background tissue data (Ecology 2012a), will be used as lines -of- evidence in
the evaluation of remedial alternatives in the FS.
STEP 6:
Specify
performance
or
acceptance
criteria
Performance or acceptance criteria will be described in the SAP /QAPP that will
be prepared following this Work Plan. The following quality control
considerations will be addressed:
E Field quality control samples.
E Laboratory quality control.
Data quality indicators for laboratory analyses (precision, accuracy,
representativeness, completeness, and comparability).
STEP 7.
Develop the
detailed plan
for obtaining
data
Black carbon analysis, bioaccumulation testing, and porewater sampling and
analysis via SPME will be performed at the 15 locations shown on Figure 11,
spanning the range of QC- normalized PCB and dioxin /furan concentrations in
Western Port Angeles Harbor. Table 6 identifies the bioaccumulation testing
stations and indicates analyses to be performed at these stations.
5.3 ADDITIONAL FS TREATABILITY TESTING
Concurrent with the bioaccumulation testing, surface sediment collected from two locations with
relatively higher sediment PCB and dioxin /furan concentrations (and with different dioxin /furan
congener profiles) will also be used for bench -scale testing of in -situ treatment using activated
carbon. The two treatability testing locations are depicted on Figure 11. Each sample will be
mixed with activated carbon, and submitted for black carbon analysis, bioaccumulation testing,
and porewater sampling and analysis via SPME using the same procedures summarized above.
The results of the treatability testing will be incorporated into the FS as appropriate.
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Western Port Angeles Harbor
6.0 Project Management and Schedule
6.1 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Allison Geiselbrecht, Floyd'Snider, will serve as overall Project Coordinator for the RI /FS. As
such, she will be the primary contact for routine Ecology communications and required Ecology
reporting, including quarterly progress reports, schedule updates, and other project
management tasks. Additionally, Floyd' Snider will be the lead author of the RI /FS, with input
and support from Integral Consulting Inc (Integral), Exponent, Inc., and Anchor QEA.
Integral, with Betsy Day as primary Integral contact, will lead the field collection efforts
described in DQOs 1 through 5. Integral will be the primary author of the RI /FS SAP, as well as
the associated QAPP and Health and Safety Plan (HASP), and the RI /FS Supplemental Data
Report (both described below). Integral will staff the field collection effort and perform or
coordinate data validation.
6.2 DATA MANAGEMENT
Data collected for this project will be validated and managed consistent with the provision in the
QAPP, which is an associated document to the SAP described in Section 6.3.
All data collected as part of this project will be submitted to Ecology in a format suitable for
upload into Ecology's Environmental Information Management (EIM) database. An official
project database will be maintained throughout the duration of this project, which will form the
basis of RI /FS analyses, including generation of tables and graphics.
6.3 DELIVERABLES
The following deliverables will be prepared:
® Draft RI /FS SAP. Includes procedures for quality assurance and quality control (in
the form of a QAPP), to collect data needed as described in Sections 4.0 and 5.0
above. The SAP will meet the requirements of WAC 173 - 340- 350(7)(c)(iv) and WAC
173 - 340 -820. The SAP will include as an attachment a draft HASP meeting the
requirements of WAC 173 - 340- 350(7)(c)(iv) and WAC 173 - 340 -810. The SAP will
also include a plan for addressing cultural resources, including an inadvertent
discovery plan. The SAP will also include a list of applicable permits and applicable
or relevant and appropriate requirements. Ecology will review the SAP. If requested
by Ecology, comments submitted by Ecology will be incorporated into a revised
document, which will be issued as the Final RI /FS SAP.
Data collection must occur in the late Spring and is scheduled to begin in June 2013.
RI /FS Supplemental Data Report (Data Report). This Data Report will accompany
the EIM data submittal. The Data Report will contain a brief synopsis of deviations
from the SAP, and data validation reports. New data will be tabulated and provided in
written form and an electronic format capable of being transferred into Ecology's EIM
data management system (as provided in WAC 173 - 340 - 840(5)). The requirement
for electronic submittal shall be complete when Ecology confirms all data are
properly submitted into EIM. Ecology's comments on the Supplemental Data Report,
if provided, will be incorporated into the RI /FS (below).
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA1Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook \2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Fdage93
Western Port Angeles Harbor
• Agency Review Draft Remedial Investigation /Feasibility Study (Agency Review
RI /FS). The Agency Review RI /FS will integrate available data from prior studies in
the Harbor and additional data collected as per the SAP following the DQO process
in this Work Plan. The RI /FS shall define the nature and extent of contamination
pursuant to WAC 173 - 340 -350 for the purpose of developing and evaluating cleanup
actions for the site. In evaluation of cleanup action alternatives, the RI /FS will follow
the requirements of WAC 173 - 340 -350 through 370.
® Public Review Draft RI /FS. The Agency Review Draft RI /FS, described above, shall
be revised to address Ecology's comments. The revised document will be submitted
to Ecology for use in the public review process.
Final RI /FS. After receipt of public comments, the Public Review Draft RI /FS will be
revised to generate a Final RI /FS document.
6.4 SCHEDULE
Draft Deliverable /Action'
Schedule2
Anticipated
Calendar Date
Schedule3
Prepare and submit draft SAP /QAPP /HASP
including a list of appropriate permits and
applicable or relevant and appropriate
requirements4
Submit on the day the Agreed
Order becomes effective.
May 2013
Ecology reviews SAP /QAPP /HASP
Ecology will endeavor to review
and approve within 20 days after..
'Agreed Order effective date.
May 2013;
Fieldwork
Begin in June 2013.
June /July 2013
Ecology reviews validated data and
approves for use in RI /FS
Ecology will endeavor to review
and approve data for use in
RI /FS within 30 days of receipt'of
final data validation package.
September 2013 `
Prepare the Draft RI /FS Supplemental Data
Report
Submit 75 days after receipt of
final data validation package
October 2013
EIM data submittal
Submit 75 days after receipt of
final data validation package.
October 2013
Ecology reviews RI /FS Supplemental Data
Report
Ecology comments will be
incorporated into RI /FS. Ecology
will endeavor to review and......,,,,, °"
comment on the RI /FS
Supplemental Data Report within
30 days of receipt.
November 2013
Agency Review Draft RI /FS Report
Submit 180 days following
receipt of final data validation
package or 150 days following
Ecology approval of data for use
in the RI /FS (whichever is later).
January 2014
Ecology reviews Agency Review Draft
RI /FS..Report ..
Ecology will endeavor to review
, and comment within 60 days of
receipt.
April 2014
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlook\2EIG30J8101 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
PJ3ge94
Western Port Angeles Harbor
Draft Deliverable /Action'
Schedule2
Anticipated
Calendar Date
Schedule3
Public Review Draft RI /FS Report
Submit 90 days following receipt
of Ecology's final comments on
Agency Review Draft RI /FS
Report
June 2014
Ecology reviews Public Review Draft RI/FS
Report
Ecology will endeavor to review
and approve within 30 days of
receipt.,
July 2014
Ecology anticipated public comment period on Public Review Draft RI /FS
(estimated 30 days)
August/September
2014
Ecology reviews comments and decision on
any revisions necessary to the Public
Review Draft RI /FS Report
Ecology will endeavor to review
comments and provide revisions
within 30 days of receipt of final ..
public comments. `:;
October 2014
Draft Final RI /FS Reports
Within 60 days of receipt of
revision deemed necessary by
Ecology on the Public Review
Draft RI /FS.
December 2014
Ecology reviews and approves the Final
R[ /FS Report
Ecology will endeavor to provide '
approval within 14 days of
receipt of draft Final RI/FS
Report.
December 2014
Agreed Order Quarterly Reports
Submit first report beginning 90
days following the Agreed Order
effective date and continue
reporting through Agreed Order.
Quarterly
beginning July
2013 until end of
Agreed Order.
Notes
1 Following the submittal of each deliverable, with the exception of quarterly reports and EIM submittals, the
WPAH Group and Ecology will endeavor to meet within 14 days to discuss the contents of the deliverable
Following Ecology's submittal of comments or revisions necessary on any deliverable, the WPAH Group
and Ecology will endeavor to meet within 14 days to discuss the comments or revisions
2 Ecology review periods are presented as goals Ecology will endeavor to make these review periods to
achieve the overall goal of completing the Final RI /FS Report by the end of 2014 All days are calendar
days, not business days
3 The anticipated calendar dates shown are subject to change based on the actual supplemental data
collection timeframe Unanticipated factors may result in modified dates and will be mutually agreed upon
by Ecology and the WPAH Group, and documented in writing
4 Draft RI /FS SAP /QAPP will be provided during the Agreed Order public review period, prior to execution of
the Agreed Order, to accelerate Ecology's review and approval process.
5 As established during the pre- Agreed Order process, the WPAH Group will work closely with Ecology
during the comment period to resolve issues and streamline report production This may result in the
submittal of draft comments and responses and meetings between the WPAH Group and Ecology
Abbreviations
Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology
EIM Environmental Information Management
HASP Health and Safety Plan
QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan
RI /FS Remedial Investigation /Feasibility Study
SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan
WPAH Western Port Angeles Harbor
C \Documents and Settings\tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Fdes\Content Outlookl2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
1:,fi9e95
Western Port Angeles Harbor
7.0 References
Anchor QEA (Anchor). 2008. Environmental Sampling Report. Prepared for Nippon Paper
Industries USA.
Ecology and Environment, Inc. (E &E). 2008. Port Angeles Harbor Final Summary of Existing
Information and Identification of Data Gaps Report. Prepared for Washington State
Department of Ecology. April.
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) 2012. Certified Sanborn Map Report, Inquiry
Number: 3445864.1. Prepared for Port of Port Angeles. 2 November.
Exponent, Inc. (Exponent). 2008. Environmental Baseline Investigation, DNR Lease 22- 077766:
Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd. Port Angeles, Washington. Prepared by Exponent,
Inc., Bellevue, Washington.
Floyd Snider McCarthy and Evans - Hamilton Inc (FSM and Evans). 2002. Port Angeles Harbor
Delisting Request. Prepared for Washington State Department of Ecology, Water
Quality, and Port Angeles Harbor Users Group. August.
FloydlSnider. 2012. Marine Trades Area Site Port Angeles, Washington Remedial
Investigation /Feasibility Study, Agency Review Draft. May.
Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation (Foster Wheeler). 1997. Current Situation /Site
Conceptual Site Model Report, Rayonier Port Angeles Mill Site.
GeoSea Consulting Ltd. (GeoSea). 2009 A Sediment Trend Analysis (STA) of Port Angeles
Harbor. Prepared for Washington State Department of Ecology. February.
Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. (Herrera). 2011. Geomorphic Report, Port Angeles
Harbor. Prepared for Ecology and Environment. February.
HistoryLink. 2013. `Port Angeles — Thumbnail History." http : / /www.historylink.org /index.cfm
?DisplayPage = output.cfm &File_Id =8210. Last accessed January 8, 2013.
Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC). 2011. Incorporating Bioavailability
Considerations into the Evaluation of Contaminated Sediment Sites. Prepared by the
Contaminated Sediments Team. February.
Kendall, David, Russ McMillan, Bill Gardiner, Brian Hester, and Jack D. Word. 2012. Bioassay
Endpoint Refinements: Bivalve Larval and Neanthes Growth Bioassays. Clarification
paper at the May 2012 Sediment Management Annual Review Meeting, Seattle,
Washington. Prepared by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington State Department
of Ecology, and NewFields, LLC. 28 August.
Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited (Larson) 2006. Cultural Resources
Guidance for United States Coast Guard Group Port Angeles, Ediz Hook, Port Angeles,
Clallam County, Washington. Prepared for U.S. Coast Guard. 31 October
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Internet
Files \Content Outlookt.2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Page §d
Western Port Angeles Harbor
Malcolm Pirnie. 2007. Phase 2 Addendum Remedial Investigation for the Marine Environment
Near the Former Rayonier Mill Site, Agency Review Draft, Port Angeles, Washington.
Prepared for Rayonier. February.
NewFields 2012. Port Angeles Harbor Supplemental Data Evaluation to the Sediment
Investigation Report, Port Angeles, Washington. Prepared for Washington State
Department of Ecology. December.
011ikainen, Rob. 2011. "Peninsula -based timber company Merrill & Ring to celebrate 125 years."
Peninsula Daily News. 24 September. http : / /www.peninsuladaiiynews.com /article/
20110925/ NEWS/ 309259983 /peninsula- based - timber - company - merrill- ring- to- celebrate-
125- years. Last accessed January 8, 2013.
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). 1999. Port Angeles Harbor Wood Waste
Study, Port Angeles, Washington, Final. Prepared for Washington State Department of
Ecology, Olympia, Washington. Science Applications International Corporation, Bothell,
WA. 5 February.
Shannon & Wilson. 1993. Historical Environmental Summary Report, Port of Port Angeles
Marine Terminal Log Yard, Port Angeles, Washington. January.
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). 1973. Memorandum from Scott Jeane,
Ecology, to Gene Asselstine, Ron Pine, and Harry Tracy re: Investigation of Reported
Marine Invertebrate Kill at Old Fiberboard Dock, Port Angeles, Washington. 7 February.
. 2012a. Port Angeles Harbor Sediment Characterization Study Sediment Investigation
Report, Port Angeles, Washington. December.
. 2012b. Port Angeles Harbor Marine Environment Screening Level Human Health and
Ecological Risk Assessment, Final Report. Prepared for Washington Department of
Ecology. Contract No. C0700036.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2006. Guidance on Systematic Planning Using
the Data Quality Objective Process. USEPA QA/G -4. EPA/240 /B06/001.
. 2012. Guidelines for Using Passive Samplers to Monitor Organic Contaminants at
Superfund Sediment Sites. OSWER Directive 9200.1- 110FS. December.
C \Documents and Settings \tpierce COPA \Local
Settings \Temporary Intemet
Fjles \Content Outlook\2EIG30J8 \01 FINAL WPAH WP
050913 REDLINE docx
May 13, 2013 FINAL
RI /FS Work Plan
Fygeg?
EXHIBIT C: Schedule to the Agreed Order for the Western Port Angeles Harbor Site
The project schedule is as follows:
AO
Section
Task
Draft Deliverable /Action'
Schedule''2
Anticipated
Calendar Date
Schedules
VII.A
1
Prepare and submit draft SAP /QAPP /HSP
including list of applicable permits and applicable
or relevant and appropriate requirements s
Submit on the day the
Agreed Order becomes
effective.
May 2013
Ecology reviews SAP /QAPP /HSP
Ecology will endeavor to
review and approve within
twenty days 'after Agreed
Order effective date.... ' . -; ,'
May 2013
VII.A
2
Fieldwork
Begin in June 2013.
June /July 2013
Ecology reviews validated data and approves for
use in RI /FS. �.. ....
Ecology will endeavor'to
review and approve data
for use in RI /FS within 30
days of receipt of final data
validation package.
September 2 013
VII.A
3
Prepare the draft RI /FS Supplemental Data Report .
Submit seventy -five days
after receipt of final data
validation package.
October 2013
VII A
4b
EIM data submittal
Submit seventy -five days
after receipt of final data
validation package.
October 2013
Ecology reviews RI/FS Supplemental Data'Report
Ecology comments wilt be
incorporated into RI /FS.
Ecology will endeavor to
review and comment on
the RI /FS Supplemental
Data Report within thirty
days of receipt.
November 2013
VII A
4a
Agency Review Draft RI /FS Report
Submit 180 days following
receipt of final data
validation package or 150
days following Ecology
approval of data for use in
the RI /FS (whichever is
later).
January 2014
Ecology reviews Agency Review Draft RI /FS,
Report
Ecology will endeavor to
review and comment
within sixty days of.receipt;
April 2014
VII A
4c
Public Review Draft RI /FS Report
Submit ninety days
following receipt of
Ecology's final comments
on Agency Review Draft
RI /FS Report
June 2014
Ecology reviews Public Review Draft RI/FS Report
Ecology will endeavor to
review and approve within
thirty days of receipt.
July 2014
Pag- f
Ecology anticipated public comment period on Public Review Draft RI /FS (estimated thirty days)
- August/September
;2014
Ecology review of comments and decision on any
revisions necessary to the Public Review Draft
RI /FS Report :
Ecology will endeavor to
review comments and
provide revisions within
thirty days of receipt of
„ final public comments.
October 2014
VII A
4d
Draft Final RI /FS Report4
Within sixty days of receipt
of revisions deemed
necessary by Ecology on
the Public Review Draft
RI /FS
December 2014
Ecology reviews and approves the Final RI /FS ..................Ecology
Report
will endeavor to ......
provide approval within
fourteen days of receipt of
draft Final RI /FS Report.
l December 2014
VII.B
Agreed Order Quarterly Reports
Submit first report
beginning ninety days
following the Agreed Order
effective date and continue
reporting through Agreed
Order
Quarterly
beginning July
2013 until end of
Agreed Order.
ores
(1) Following the submittal of each deliverable, with the exception of quarterly reports and EIM submittals,
the PLPs and Ecology will endeavor to meet within 14 days to discuss the contents of the deliverable.
Following Ecology's submittal of comments or revisions necessary on any deliverable, the PLPs and
Ecology will endeavor to meet within 14 days to discuss the comments or revisions.
(2) Ecology review periods are presented as goals Ecology will endeavor to make these review periods to
achieve the overall goal of completing the Final RI /FS by the end of 2014. All days are calendar days, not
business days.
(3)
Draft RI /FS SAP /QAPP will be provided during the Agreed Order public review period, prior to execution
of the Agreed Order, to accelerate Ecology's review and approval process
(4) As established during the pre- Agreed Order process, the PLP group will work closely with Ecology during
the comment period to resolve issues and streamline report production This may result in the submittal of
draft comments and responses and meetings between the PLP group and Ecology
(5) The anticipated calendar dates shown are subject to change based on the actual supplemental data
collection timeframe. Unanticipated factors may result in modified dates and will be mutually agreed upon
by Ecology and the PLPs, and documented in writing
Abbreviations
Ecology
EIM
HSP
PLP
RI /FS
SAP
QAPP
Washington State Department of Ecology
Environmental Information Management
Health and Safety Plan
Potentially Liable Parties
Remedial Investigation /Feasibility Study
Sampling and Analysis Plan
Quality Assurance Project Plan
Pagei2 c
CITY OF
PORIANGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: May 21, 2013
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Glenn A. Cutler, P. E., Director of Public Works & Utilities
SUBJECT: Upgrade and Expansion of Wastewater Utility Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition (SCADA) System, Project WW02 -2010 Phase 1
Summary: Project WW02 -2010 provides for the upgrade and expansion of the Wastewater
Utility's Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System. Authorization is sought to
implement phases A & B for this project.
Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Manager to:
1) Amend the 2013 CFP and budget for project WW02 -2010 (Phases A& B) to $730,103
from sources identified in the memo; and
2) sign a contract with Technical Services, Inc. of Lynnwood, Washington in the amount
of $570,103 including taxes; and
3) sign purchase orders in the amount of $125,000 for supporting IT equipment for the
project.
Background /Analysis: Project WW02 -2010 provides for the upgrade and expansion of the
Wastewater Utility's Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System. The SCADA
system controls and automatically actuates many functions across the wastewater treatment
process, notifying WWTP personnel through alarms to serious conditions in the plant, and
acquiring and recording a myriad of data readings in the plant. Essentially, it is the single most
important system in the plant, being its logic control system. The existing system was installed in
1993 and its information technology systems and hardware are highly out of date, obsolete, and /or
inefficient. The system has key components such as programming logic controllers (PLC) that are
the original equipment.
PLCs are essentially nothing more than special - purpose, industrial computers. As such, they are
built far more ruggedly than an ordinary personal computer (PC), and designed to run extremely
reliable operating system software. PLCs as a rule do not contain hard disk drives, cooling fans, or
any other components with moving parts. This is an intentional design decision, intended to
maximize the reliability of the hardware in harsh industrial environments where the PLC chassis
N: \CCOUNCIL\FINAL \Wastewater SCADA Upgrade & Expansion, Project WW02- 2010.docx
K-1
May 21, 2013 City Council
Re: Wastewater SCADA Upgrade & Expansion, Project WW02 -2010
Page 2
may be subjected to temperature extremes, vibration, humidity, and airborne particulates (dust,
fibers, and /or fumes). The Wastewater Utility's contains many of the original Texas Instrument
505 and 555 PLCs which are obsolete and no longer supported. In addition, the system lacks many
of the control points needed to efficiently operate in today's highly regulated environs. A lot of
field infrastructure, including most pump stations and CSO outfalls, are either not fully integrated
or not controlled at all by the WWTP. In addition, data acquisition is not sufficient, leaving
significant data gaps or inefficiencies. The new system proposed in this project will integrate into
data servers that can be managed efficiently with existing City IT systems.
The project will be a multiphase project, with work spanning up to a five (5) year period. In
addition, maintenance and support will occur during this term with the option to extend
maintenance and support for five (5) additional years. The contract contains four phases:
Phase A — Design, Upgrade, and Replace Existing WWTP SCADA system. The existing
equipment is to be replaced, including modern programmable logic controllers (PLCs) for four
(4) control panels and other associated equipment, such as computers, information technology,
networking, and software improvements. Bidder will provide upgrade design, integration,
installation, and programming to implement the same or similar configuration with improved
functionality of the existing SCADA system. The primary system will have control
redundancy and all units (including networking equipment within this scope) will have UPS
power protection with battery backup.
Phase B — CSO Phase 1 Applications Programming. The CSO Phase 1 project that is currently
under construction provides new sewer interceptors, tanks, facilities, upgrades, and
improvements to the wastewater plant and infrastructure. The work of this SCADA phase
includes all necessary programming required to provide a complete SCADA system integration
of the new CSO Phase 1 infrastructure into the City's SCADA system. There are six control
panels and four PLCs associated with this that require applications programming.
Future Phase C — Offsite Facilities not at Existing WWTP or CSO. This phase of the project
will replace offsite controllers with modern controllers as designed for the systems provided in
Phase A. There are three (3) offsite control panels connected through fiber optic networks
owned by the City. There are ten (10) additional sites without existing communications into the
SCADA control system, for a total of thirteen (13) sites included in this phase.
Future Phase D — CSO Phase 2 Applications Programming. The CSO Phase 2 construction
contract will replace the City's pump station number 4 (PS4) entirely, replace gravity sewer
mains in the downtown area, as well as alterations to CSO outfalls 6, 7, and 8. The work of
this SCADA phase includes all necessary programming required to provide a complete
SCADA system integration of the new CSO Phase 2 infrastructure into the City's SCADA
system. Programming will be done to the WWTP SCADA system and compatible with the
Phase A implementation of this contract.
Only Phases A & B and service maintenance are being awarded at this time. Phases C & D are
included within the scope of this project and will be awarded after City Council approval in future
years.
K -2
May 21, 2013 City Council
Re: Wastewater SCADA Upgrade & Expansion, Project WW02 -2010
Page 3
The City solicited proposals for the upgrade and expansion of the Wastewater Utility's
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System, Project WW02 -2010 on March 8,
2013. The City advertised in the Daily Journal of Commerce (Seattle Edition), Peninsula Daily
News, Builders Exchange of Washington, as well as direct notification to numerous SCADA
system integrators. Proposals were due on April 15, 2013. Only one proposal was received from
Technical Systems, Inc., of Lynnwood Washington. A Technical Evaluation Board of Maher
Abed, Michael Szatlocky, and Gary Richmond evaluated the proposal for compliance with the
terms of the specification and determined their proposal to satisfy the requirements, having
significant experience, qualifications, and a superior service record.
Michael Puntenney, City Engineer and Nathan Palmatier of Conley Engineering, Inc., performed
the cost evaluation and negotiations. The following is a summary of the original proposed cost
and final negotiated amounts:
Line
Item
Description
Original
Proposal
Final Negotiated
Price
1
Phase A — WWTP Upgrade
Mobilization/Data Collection
$22,000
Bonding
$8,000
Project Management
$16,000
Engineering
$48,000
Programming
$149,000
Equipment Purchase
$145,000
Fabrication
$21,000
Factory Acceptance Test
$13,000
Startup, Commissioning, and Training
$43,000
Phase A Total
$599,250
$486,000
2
Phase B — CSO Phase 1
$39,925
$39,925
3
1st Year Maintenance
$6,000
$0
4
Minor Changes
$20,000
$0
Subtotal
$665,175
$525,925
Taxes (8.4 %) - Phase A & Maintenance
$55,875
$44,178
Total
$721,050
$570,103
Additionally, there are supporting upgrades the City's Information Technology Division has
brought forth to integrate this with their long range IT strategies for City computer systems, and to
ensure system redundancy for the City's server, network connectivity, and backup strategy. The
current SCADA systems have no system data storage, hardware, software redundancy, or failover
capability. They currently also do not reside on an industry defined server, but rather in the case of
the WWTP, is on a desktop personal computer. This presents serious risk to the City in the event
of a failure. While these IT upgrades were not part of the original CFP budget request for this
project, they are considered by both the Public Works and IT staff's as essential to eliminating
these vulnerabilities in the system for this critical infrastructure. The IT division has identified two
possible separate strategies for this implementation.
K -3
May 21, 2013 City Council
Re: Wastewater SCADA Upgrade & Expansion, Project WW02 -2010
Page 4
Their preferred strategy provides both a primary redundancy initially with the ability for the
system architecture to grow with the addition of other SCADA systems, such as PAWTP and the
Electric Utility's, with the ability of secondary redundancy. This will be done with the primary
system residing at the facility and the emergency roll over and capabilities residing at the City's
disaster redundancy (DR) data center located at the Corps Yard. In the event of a
hardware /software failure at the primary, the systems will automatically rollover to the primary or
secondary system for continued operation. With this system configuration, all systems will be
backed up nightly to both a primary and secondary backup site with eventual repository at an
external eastern Washington location. This strategy is estimated to cost approximately $125,000
and encompasses the primary system for WWTP and the primary redundant system residing at the
DR data center. Data storage and capability has been built into the primary redundant system for
redundancy for both PAWTP and Electrical. Their primary replacement will be budgeted
separately in the CFP for the actual location and site. This strategy allows for the entire SCADA
network to remain secure as well as the ability to have many functions of a "Private Cloud" based
solution. Also encompassed into this is the strategy of Thin Client capabilities for workstations
and possible secure wireless mesh capabilities of SCADA communications and monitoring in the
field at pumps, lift stations, and other supporting structures.
The secondary strategy is less desirable since it eliminates the primary redundancy system located
at the DR datacenter as well as additional capabilities for other future SCADA systems. This
limits the WWTP /CSO system redundancy to only its own minimal hard drive redundancy as well
as redundant power supplies. No overall total system or software redundancy will be available.
Additionally, no communication redundancy will be available. Thin Client capabilities for
workstations and remote access will also be unavailable since it was to reside on the system at the
DR site for load balancing. This strategy is estimated to cost $75,000 for the server and its
software.
Currently, the City has contracted for $25,000 on design for this project. Implementing the
preferred IT strategy, and with a $10,000 contingency, the total project budget would require
$730,103 to complete phases A & B. If the secondary IT strategy is used, the total project budget
would require $680,103 to complete phases A & B. Currently, staff has identified $525,000 of
available budget for this work. In addition, the staff is recommending reprogramming $163,003
from project W W27 -1999, Biennial Sewer Replacements for this project and carrying forward
from 2012 $16,500 of WWTP server upgrade funding from the operations budget. In addition,
from the 2013 budget, the annual SCADA maintenance will not be required due to the upgrade and
is requested to be used for the project. The following table summarizes the budget sources.
May 21, 2013 City Council
Re: Wastewater SCADA Upgrade & Expansion, Project WW02 -2010
Page 5
Budget Source
Budget Account
Budget Amount
2013 WW02 -2010 Project Budget
453- 7488
-594
-6510
$525,000
2013 WWTP SCADA Maintenance
403 - 7480
-535
-4810
$15,600
2012 WWTP Server Upgrade
403 - 7480
-594
-6410
$16,500
2013 WW27 -1999 (Biennial Sewer Repair)
Project Reprogramming
453- 7488
-594
-6510
$173,003
Total
$730,103
It is recommended that City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to:
1) Amend the 2013 CFP and budget for project WW02 -2010 (Phases A& B) to $730,103 from
sources identified in the memo; and
2) sign a contract with Technical Services, Inc. of Lynnwood, Washington in the amount of
$570,103 including taxes; and
3) sign purchase orders in the amount of $125,000 for supporting IT equipment for the project.
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
April 10, 2013
6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Thomas Davis, Duane Morris, David Miller, Tim Boyle,
Scott Headrick
Members Excused: Doc Reiss, One vacancy
Staff Present: Sue Roberds, Nathan West, Heidi Greenwood
Public Present: Deanne Volker, John Teichert
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chair Miller opened the regular meeting at 6:00 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Davis moved to approve the February 27, 2013, regular meeting
minutes. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Boyle and passed 5 — 0.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS — MCA 13 -01 — Consideration of
various minor amendments intended to correct or clarify existing regulations
identified in Sections 8 (Health and Sanitation), 11 (Streets and Sidewalks), 13
(Public Utilities), 14 (Buildings and Construction), 16 (Subdivision) and 17
(Zoning) of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. (Continued from February 27,
2013.)
Chair Miller opened the continued public hearing. Following discussion regarding a
recommendation to remove certain items from consideration based on subsequent discussion
with City Public Works and Utilities staff, and there being no further public testimony, Chair
Miller closed the public hearing.
Planning Manager Roberds clarified that the City's Public Works and Utilities staff requested
that certain sections of Section 11.08.140 and 14.32 PAMC proposed for amendment be
removed from consideration at this time. Commission members and staff discussed rewording
suggestions that could make the intent of the remaining amendments more succinct and
Commissioner Boyle moved to recommend that the City Council approve the amendments
as amended during discussion. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Morris and
passed 5 — 0.
M -1
Planning Commission Minutes
April 10, 2013
Page 2
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None
STAFF REPORTS
BYLAW DISCUSSION
Planning Manager Sue Roberds noted that Chair Miller asked staff to open discussion in
review of the Commission's bylaws. Copies of the Bylaws were presented with suggested edits
to provide clarity and correctness. The Commissioners reviewed the materials, made further
suggested edits, and determined to continue discussion at the May 8 regular meeting.
CONTINUED DISCUSSION - DRAFT STREET TREE ORDINANCE
Director West indicated that staff is continuing to review the draft street tree ordinance
with other City department staff and has made edits to address the Commission's first review of
the proposed ordinance. It is anticipated that a public hearing will be set following directive
provided by senior City staff later this summer but such a hearing has not been scheduled at this
time.
Director West thanked those members of the Commission who attended the recent
Department of Commerce short course training at Peninsula College. He believed the training
was worthwhile and commented on the information presented regarding public records
implications for Planning Commissioners that was discussed in detail during the training.
Commissioner Davis said he had taped the session with approval of the trainer and offered the
tape to anyone who desired a refresher.
Attorney Greenwood commented that likely the only real concern regarding e-mail
communication would be if Commissioners individually discussed issues of consideration
amongst themselves in groups by e -mail. Such action would likely be a violation of the Open
Public Meetings Act and result in opening personal computers for inspection by the public.
Chair Miller noted that he does not archive his mail so he would not be keeping any e-mail sent
to him but did believe that by having a City e-mail account that any communication sent to him
would be available for public review in an independent manner than from his personal computer.
Director West noted that Commissioners may be benefit from some public records
training in the future. He also noted that since there are no agenda items for discussion for the
April 24th meeting date, that meeting will be cancelled.
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
None
ELECTIONS
It was decided that elections will be conducted at the May 8 regular meeting.
M -2
Planning Commission Minutes
Apr,l10, 2013
Page 3
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7 p.m.
Sue Roberds, Secretary David Miller, Chair
PREPARED BY: S. Roberds
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
MAY 21, 2013
CITY COUNCIL
WILLIAM BLOOR, CITY ATTORNEY
SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM - EASTMAN V. CITY OF PORT ANGELES
SUMMARY: Benjamin Eastman filed a claim against the City in October, 2012.
alleged damages in the amount of $425,000 arising from an incident that occurred on
2012. The claim was mediated on May 17. As a result of the mediation, the parties
settlement of $125,000, subject to approval of the City Council.
Recommendation: Approve the settlement and authorize the City Manager
documents implementing the settlement resulting from the mediation.
The claim
January 13,
agreed to a
to execute
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In the early morning of January 13, 2012, Mr. Eastman was
pursued by several Port Angeles police officers. At the conclusion of the pursuit, Mr. Eastman
suffered a broken leg which required surgical treatment. Subsequently, he filed a claim against
the City of Port Angeles alleging that the police officers used excessive force in arresting him,
and he claimed damages against the City in the amount of $425,000. The City denied the use of
excess force and denied all liability.
In this case, there are numerous disputed legal issues as well as disputed facts. With the hope of
avoiding the costs associated with pre -trial preparation and with the cooperation of plaintiff's
counsel, the parties arranged for an early mediation of the case. That mediation took place on
May 17, and it did produce a settlement. The essence of the settlement is:
• The City will pay to the plaintiff and his attorney, $125,000.
• In return, plaintiff will execute a full release in favor of all the defendants of all claims.
• The agreement is conditioned upon approval by the Port Angeles City Council.
Page 2
May 21, 2013
Memo to Council Re Eastman Settlement
Although the City has denied liability for damages in this case, as a practical matter there is risk
in taking a case such as this into litigation. Staff recommends the settlement of $125,000 as a
reasonable and appropriate conclusion to this claim.