HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 06/05/2001
.
.
.
I~- --- ~-- -
I
I Scanned to LaserFiche
, /-~g ,O~
_ AGENDA :1ie,~t!dJ1.IUd. II~t/I~
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
321 EAST FIFTH STREET
~ORT .ANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U.S. A.
June 5, 2001
REGULAR MEETING - 6:00 p.m.
, ' , " ,
" AGENDA ITEM " First Action ?' Action Becommendation
, , ' Pue ,
A. CALL TO ORDER - Regular Meetmg (6 00 p.m.)
ROLL CALL -
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -
CEREMONIAL MATTERS &
PROCLAMATIONS
1. PresentatiOn to Tom Sperlme 1 Perform Presentations
2. Pubhc Service Award - Police Department 3
B. WORK SESSION
Workshop for Stormwater Utility FormatiOn 5 Conduct Work Session
C. LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON THIS OR FUTURE AGENDAS (By Councli, Staff or Pubbc) AND
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA (ThIS IS the opportunIty for members of the
pubbc to speak to the CIty Councli about anythmg not on the agenda, please keep comments to 5-10 mmutes.)
D. FINANCE
I Acceptance of Downtown Watermain / 7 Accept Project
SIdewalks - Phase II ,
2 Accept "A" Street & Grant Street Waterhne 9 Ac~ept Replacement Project
Replacement Project
3 Edgewood Drive / Lauridsen Blvd. Realign- 11 Accept bId award
ment BId Award
E. CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of mInutes - May 22, 200 I CIty 13 ActIOn Accept Item
CounCIl Regular MeetIng
F. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
G. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS
Modifications to Outdoor Burning OrdInance 21 Adopt Ordinance with Modifications
H. RESOLUTIONS ~
Set Public Hearing/for CFPfYlr 31
-#
----------
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
June 5, 2001 Port Angeles City Council Meeting
Page - 1
" , , ' ' ,
'AGEND4:~Tm.M , ' , .,fit Actio." Aetion Recommendation
" .
: -,' " N ,Paee - ;
"
I. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
AppoIntment to Construction Code Board of 33 AppoIntment
Appeals
J. PUBLIC HEARINGS - QUASI-JUDICIAL
(7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter)
K. PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER
2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - CPA 37 ContInue to June 18, 2001
01-01
L. INFORMATION
1 City Manager's Calendar & Project Status Reports (Page 89)
* Industnal WaterlIne Repairs (Page 95)
* Human Resources Report (Page 97)
2. Planning Conumssion MInutes - April 25, 2001 & May 9,2001 (Pages 99 & 113)
M. EXECUTIVE SESSION (As needed and determmed by CIty Attorney)
N. ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings are set by the City Council In order to meet legal requirements pertaining to matters such as, land use permit applications, proposed
amendments to City land use regulations, zonmg changes, annexations. In addition, the City Council may set a public hearing In order to receive publiC Input
pnor to makmg deCISions which Impact the citizens Certam matters may be controversial, and the City Council may choose to seek public opinion throug.
the public heaTing process
G \CNCLPKT\AGENDA\Ol-0605 wpd
.
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
June 5, 2001 Port Angeles CIty Council MeetIng
Page - 2
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON. USA.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
I.
CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING:
II. ROLL CALL:
Members Present:
Mayor Doyle
Councilman Campbell
Councilmember Erickson
Councilman Hulett
Councilmember McKeown
Councilman Wiggins
Councilman Williams
Staff Present:
Manager Quinn
Attorney Knutson
Clerk Upton
B. Collins
M. Connelly
G. Cutler
D. McKeen
T.Riepe
y. Ziomkowski
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE;
it
V
V
/'
~
+
~
Led bY----:1'i\e..'(f"- ~f2t. ~
June 5, 2001
Coer;.
D.~.
I
.~
· ~ORT ANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, USA
DATE OF MEETING: June 5. 2001
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Attendance Roster
LOCATION:
City Council Chambers
LZ ~ lJ-JB; '\ PUl. ST S-Jt Ie I'). PCll2i, eI t:
rOs- bJ - //~ Sr;-
I / I l;v / .2 Th
If3 0?11
I
1
!
City of Port Angeles
~ORTANGELES
Ordinance/Resolution Distribution List
WAS H I N G TON, USA
City Council Meeting of
if" 0~d~ ~ +./I)..f)1
:j:~ V) .L J - TJP
~.., L ^I' i1~ dJ(Y}.O -
~':'I)~ .A ~ .. ....,
City Manager '''i
City Atty. (1) ) vi' I y/
Planning 1/
City Clerk (2) !) 7/ ,:)~ V'"
Deputy Clerk (1) J 7 I ../
Personnel
Cust. Svcs.
Finance
Dlr ./Mgr.
Police Dept /
Fire Dept. /7
Light Dept. /
Pub. Works (2) ~/ ~",,7
Parks & Rec.
MRSC (1) J7 17
PDN (Summary) "'~J J N\rv\ J
Extra Copies /
(I.-. ", ~MJ'" 1/
f" ~: b D' - }7
I\.
I TOTAL I ~ In
.....~.-< -- ........ .
,/'~"'~S';': --...
;/$,# 4~~,!;"--:~-I.U"
;~-
~-t.'i.'~"""'--~,'~ --:-~""~'~~~~r:~~~"_~"",
./---'--~'-----'~'~.._..
I
I
t.
f
;
,
,
I
i
~
,
~
,
~
f
l
i
r
.:
l
f
!
,
t
"
~
r:
I
l
\ \. ~~ ~;; . .~~-, ,~::~, ..
\..~- -,- "'--~- , -.
, ",.. "J.A!:<"-.:'7; .:.::, , !'
"~~~t~~~:~-, -
PROCLAMATION
Tom Sperline Retirement
November 22, 1982 - May 31, 2001
WHEREAS, Tom has worked for the City of Port Angeles since November 22, 1982 in the
capacity of Maintenance Technician, Electrical Inspector and Senior Electrical
Inspector; and
WHEREAS, one of the ways to describe Tom's attitude is that he has always been willing to
respond to calls, day or night, and assist the Light Operations crew in every
way; and
WHEREAS, the result of Tom's efforts and his extraordinary skills has been the
improvement of the health, safety, and comfort of the community; and
WHEREAS, Tom now desires to retire from City employment.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Larry Doyle, Mayor, on behalf of the Port Angeles City Council do
hereby proclaim on behalf of a grateful City Council as follows:
WE REGRETFULLY APPROVE Tom Sperline's retirement and do congratulate him on a
distinguished career with the City and wish him all the best on his retirement.
June 5. 2001
"
Larry Doyle, Mayor of Port Angeles
"
,
,.
,
r
f
t
.~
~
~~~i'lfl'A~",-~"""'~~$R",ff'IJ"-~.ijIq-;!,-A6JV~~'V......r.?~~.:-<:'!.I~">;';'.z,t.....
t
i
l
i
~
[
t
~
t
f
f
t
~
f
t,
r
,
"
c
~
j
~.
1
o
~
~
~
.
.
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
~ORTANGELES
"I
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
City Council Memo
June 5,2001
Mayor Doyle AND City Council
:It
Tom Riepe, Police Chief
Public Service Award from the Police Department to Mr. Lee Darling
Summary: Following the inception of the PAPD K-9 program in 1996, Mr. Lee Darling started
assisting Corporal Kevin Miller during K-9 training by acting as a quarry. Since that time, Lee has
volunteered more than 500 hours of his own time to the police department. Lee has helped decoy
for both the PAPD and the U.S. Forest Services K-9 programs on many occasions Mr Darling has
helped to make PAPD's K-9 program a great success and the police department would like to honor
and recognize him for his outstanding assistance.
Recommendation: The police department requests that Mayor Doyle assist the police
de artment in awardin Mr Lee Darlin the Port An e1es Police De artment Public Service Award.
Background / Analysis: Mr. Lee Darling is the assistant manager of the Safeway Store in Port
Townsend. He has worked for Safeway for 29 years. Mr. Darling and his wife, Jane, have lived in
Port Angeles for 17 years They have one son, Christopher, who is 13 years old In addition to
assisting Corporal Miller with the K-9 program, Lee has coached Port Angeles Little League base
ball for the past four years.
101-01-019
3
.
~
~
,
PROCLAMATION
In Recognition of the
U.S.C.G. Cutter Active and Crew
WHEREAS, The U.S.C.G. Cutter Active and her crew are stationed at the City Piel' in Pon
Angeles, often for six weeks at a time; and
WHEREAS, In May 2001, the Cutter and crew discovered and seized more than 13 tons of
cocaine aboard the Belize-flagged fishing vessel Svesda Maw in the Pacific
Ocean, 1,700 miles south of San Diego, making it the largest cocaine seizure in
maritime history; and
.
WHEREAS, In the past, the Active has earned a "snowflake" decal and two marijuana decal~
for their role in previous drug busts, recently earning her second "snowflake"
decal; and
WHEREAS, The 210 foot ship and 74-member crew are now back safely in their home port.
The City of Pon Angeles has always taken great pride in having the Active and
her crew stationed at our city pier;
\'OW, THEREFORE, I, Larry Doyle, Mayor of Port Angeles, on behalf of the Port Angelet>
(~lty Council and citizenry do hereby publicly thank the crew for their efforts on behalf of all
of U:>, and heartily commend them for their devotion to duty and country. I urge all citizens
[(. r'eilect today on the bravery that helps to keep us free of drugs and criminal activities.
Thank you!
L(IITY Doyle, Mayor
June 9, 2001
.
....
/'
PROCLAMATION
Hire a Vet Mon'th
June 2001
WHEREAS, More than 9600 veterans reside in Port Angeles and Clallam County area
who have served our country with dedication, perseverance and courage,
ranking our state veteran population fourth highest per capita in the
nation, and
WHEREAS, Washington employers have recognized the lifelong contributions that
veterans and family members have made in this state and the expectations
that veterans have as we move into the 21 sI century, and
WHEREAS, Port Angeles makes up part of the over 1200 Clallam County veterans who
have sought employment and training services from the Employment
Security Department during the last program year, and
WHEREAS, the City of Port Angeles recognizes that veterans are well-trained, and
sometimes an untapped pool of labor with a wide range of technical skills,
and
WHEREAS, the City of Port Angeles, State of Washington, and the Employment
Security Department are committed to providing quality employment
assistance to veterans,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Larry Doyle, mayor of the City of Port Angeles, on behalf of the
City Council, do hereby proclaim June, 2001, as the
Hire-A-Veteran Month
in Port Angeles, and I urge all citizens to join me in this special observance
June 5, 2001
Larry Doyle, Mayor
~
"""
.,J
.
.
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
June 5, 2001
MAYOR DOYLE AND CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
WORKSHOP TO CONSIDER FORMATION OF A STORMW ATER UTILITY
Summary: A presentation will be given by the City's Wastewater/Stormwater Consultant,
Brown & Caldwell, on the City's current stormwater management program, future needs and
rational for forming a stormwater utility.
Recommendation: Direct the Director of Public Works and Utilities to proceed with the
develo ment of a Stormwater Utili for im lementation on Janua 1,2002.
Background / Analysis: In the City's current contract with Brown & Caldwell we included a
task to provide an analysis to assist us in determining the differences between our existing
stormwater program and the mandated stormwater management requirements of federal
programs (Endangered Species Act (ESA) and National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Phase II Stormwater) impacting our wastewater and stormwater systems. Brown &
Caldwell has completed the initial gap analysis and their findings were presented to the UAC
meeting on May 7,2001.
This gap analysis evaluated the current City codes, policies, organization, funding, staffing, and
activities in place and what revisions and added funding would be required to bring the City into
compliance with the existing and pending mandated requirements for stormwater management.
Mr. James Hansen of Brown & Caldwell will be making a workshop presentation to Council
regarding the gap analysis, the need for a funding source, and present a schedule for
implementation. He, as well as staff, will be available to answer questions.
G \EXCHANGE\PWKS\storm wpd
5
1rlI[(L&@1]W~
C!J ill IJ ~ till @ m ill
TI (Q)(Q)l C5 ~ @)OOil 0
~~TI~fJl J[~lP6R&m(Q)~~
lP6 ~~lP6@)J[~ J(Q) 1]J(Q)~lP6J!@)1P~~1]J(Q)~
~(Q)JI@[ ~1JTI@)m@)~lP6mn
J[@)~lB?R&m(Q)~fS ~lill@)Jill[ffi~ JJ(Q) lill(Q)~~mTIlB?AH[
TI~Q)m(Q)8) 4~J
~@)TI@)~1Dl\( ~(Q)cdI J(Q) 4~J
.'
(
~
~
\.
\
,
.1
f%J ~.
~~~]
~rr9i
.... .~
;---~"
.<>
~
o~
~
~
Q
s
g
OH
i
S
~
(QQ)
~
e:2J
~
L
~
~
~ ~ ~
@J ~ ~F1
o~ o~ ~ ~
fW ~ ~
~ ~ ~ i
~ ~ ~
1 ~ I I
(0iJ g ! ~
~ ~ Y E(
~ ~ @2) (0iJ ~
oa oj ~ 8 ~ ~
@2) ~ o~ l~ ~ U
~~~~~
O~1~g~
~ ~ < ! i of
~~~~@2)~
Glg Y ~ (0iJ 8 @J
g (ill) g @J ~
~~~ U~U
o 0 0 0 0 0
~(Q)(Q)~ i\wm f i\~ lP~dnJillllb~Jr ~(O)(QI~ =
<<1m ~~~~ 1m ~U1J~lQ]J~~1]5~~
~@~ @~~~tIDLf6~~ ~'illJ@(5)5)W ~U1J~tmTI&)~~ 0
~(Q)(Q)~ lqI~ i\~ ~~~@ = oy (drEIo~o fJl =
~1JUTIL0~@l dJ&)~1]5~lillrnJ@~~ TITI ~@1]5TIU@l <<~mcm~
lQ]J~~@1~ @@~1]5~m ~~TIU5)@~cm ~tIDLf6~1IDl]J@@l ~U1J@I}D1]5 WI 0
~(Q)(Q)~ ~~f ~A1p}~~JJJJ~ = ~&d[~n ~~~ =
<<Wm)) ~W @~~~@~ ~~~~U1Jm 0
~~lill@)m@)~]b)@)(dI 1PJTIJ]]5 ~lill@~~1B5~@)(dI ~lill@)~@)(dI
/ ~
?' @ (Q
~ ~
(Q) (12) (12) ~
~ I @J @J
o~ ~
~ cr o~
~ ~ (12)
s o~ (12)
~ @d) ~ @J
~ o~ ~ (12)
9 (12)
O~ ot ~
~ i
~d tQP 8
@ @j2) I (ill) y
~ s ~ o~
S ~ ~
9 (12) (Q ~
~o~ (ill) (Q ~
I ~ ~ ~ ~
@ 00 I (Q (Q
~~ oS] ~
@) i ~ ~ ~
g ~ o~ ~ ~
~ Q)
(9[Q)@ ~ os
~~ @ ~ ~
@d) ~@d)
~~ ~ (12) @d)
~ 1 ~ ~
~ @ ~ ~ ~~ Q) (12)
tQP~ o~
OR ~
~ (Q) ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
@ ~ Q) Q t
~~ ~ o~ ~ ~
I 00 00 00 (12) ~vq
I (Q @2) ~
I ~ @ ~ ~ ;:!
i ~~ ~
I ~ ~ <ill)
I
I ~ "0 ~ ~ v=g ~ ~~O
I] ~ ~~ oS
II (9, ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ I~
~'
I @ rg (12) Q ~
~ ~ ~
I [OOJ ~
I ~
0 0 0 0
OH
g
r::
I
I
i @
~ S
~OH
~~
~~
I i
OOJ~
C90~
i~
~ ~
~ @
~~
~ 00
~ @)
~ ~
cg
~
~
o~
U
~
~ 8
A ~Q
~ ~
OR ~
:I ~
6
@2) ~
S ~ ~o
@ o~ ~
~ (8 00
~ g 0
OR (Q)
~ ~ 0
~
~~
~
P1
ro
~
@d)
o
~
@d)
S
~
(Q
01
~
~
~
(Q)
o~
~
~
~
@d)
~
JQ)
~
I
~ I
@d)
~~ ~O
~ ~-
~ ~
o
I
J
~
(Q)
@d)
~
(Q
(02)
~
~
~
~
@d)
~
~
~
JQ)
~
(02)
~
o
~
~
~
Q)
~
(02)
~
~
ot
s
(ill)
~
o~
(02)
8
~
(02)
@
~
J
(02)
~
@J)
!
~
u
o
~~(Q)5) ~~5) ~=~lill@TI @)5)TI1l[p)@)'2ill 0
~~(Q)5) J(Q) mr(Q)~TI1l~lUm~W @)TI~~]JTI1lfu)@) @)[p)~A(Q)JJ@ 0
~@)~~lilllIllWI@@@@ g\\@)lill(Q)TIillI ~~ ~~116JW[ 0
~]JTI1l~'&&116TI ~@ [p)J1~ ~mA@)J1@ @TI@)IHI 0
~mr@)TIillI@)~TI1lfu)@!JI Jhn@~116~@)J1 ~~~[P)\f 0
l~~N 4~TI~~f1llqJ~~TI~lOOJ~E[ A"
_ ... ~"" ,~ _ _~^ _ .F
I
I
" ~ :
~ ,", I
-j
I
I
I
I
OO~CS @~@cs ~ ~
OO(Q)CS~wL~
~~(Q)&cd[ ~lImV ~(Q)JL
~(Q)dJcd[ ~~cdI~:J)
oo~CSw~(Q)CS ~ ~
oo~CS @@ ~~
oo~CSw~@~
oo~CS ~ w~~
~ ~~~L ~=(Q))
t[[0@ JL W@TI{[~
~o~~
~ ~~~L (Q) ~ =~)
t[[0@JL -CWJI
gm~ ~(Q)(Q) ~
~~lliI@)1illTI@)dI1]illl1h@)(ill @)illllliI@) A@)(ill @)~illl~
~J@J (Q)JIcrlI JI@)~IB5E&JIIDJJI(Q)~ ~
o
o
L.()
N
o
o
o
N
E
~
0>
e
a..
E
L-
~
I
0>
I c
0
---l
E
~
0>
0
L-
,I a..
E
L-
~
I
t
0
...c
(f)
I E
~
0>
0
L-
a..
0'>
c
........
en
X
W
o
o
L.()
o
o
L.()
o
o
o
o
~
~
SOOO~$ 'SaJnJIPuadx3
" ,
: fir J t ',;, "" ~ l
", ",' J'::~~'~::;:i:~~~:iF"'}'f~~~< "':"
< <!o T; ~,J" ,1,,_;
lPlill1llidI ~~{8) 0
~~1lli~~(dI &~~~~'@& 0
~~1lli~~(dI ~~~ & lP1J[(Q)~ 0
~@)Q)JITffi(Q)~ lIWJI@)A@)~ m(Q)JID 1P@)1Pm~
~~ lJJI1l'@~(Q)JrcdI Jr@)~W~1]]JJr(Q)~~ ~UTI~~~~ffi
. Drainage system
maintenance
· Street sweeping
8j1t(Q)1TIITffiW~1t~IT' llt~~~(Q)IID~llfujllllll1tll~~ 8j~llll1t
IE~ltw~~1ID 8j~W~IT'~lllQ)~~~~IID1t~
CC~lt ~~ltii(Q)1ITl
Ci~ Mall!1lager
Ci~y A~~onlley
DelPartmero~ off
Commo..mi~
Deve~olPmell1l~
· Building Inspection
1P1UI1b~ic Wor~s
arod lUJ~m~ies
Adm ill1lis~ra~ioro
Othler
DelPartmero~s
Erogi roeeri rog
· Stormwater design
· Construction
· ESe inspection
IEquipmerot
Services
· SW Equip. purchase
and maintenance
Resource
ManaJgement
lE~ectlT'ic
lUJtm~
So~id Waste
Management
\Nater Utility
Was~ewa~er
Managemen~
· Drainage maintenance
o WQ Facility Inspection
Streets
JF (Q)JTIlIOliiml~ ~ ~w UQIlliIllty Acdl(dlll'(9~~(9~
(Q)ll~~llITlll~~QIl(Q)Iill mcdl JF1illilllcdlfurn~ 1M (9(9cdl~
o ~.~ p(Q)Mlt CQ){f ff~~pCQ)illl~iUbiliLty {fCQ)fE 1J1cdlm~~~~
~(Q)illllipli~ ~lt(Q}illlTIlr\~}?'@,li:~ff m~.m~illlli: n~~~~
o A ~~lbli~ 2ID1llicdl bCQ)wml (cg}llMlillllblLty) ff~~illllL1l~ ~(Q}lL1lffCC~ li:(Q)
fumlcdl ~@,pil1tWl1J1illlcdl (Q}p~~lbl(Q}illld 1J1~ill1wnill1~~
o Gff~[~ {ffimlbiliLty {f(Q}fE ~cg}m~lbliy 1J1~~~~~~ ~~~
~[ ~~ pff(Q)p(Q}ffill1(Q}illlm [CQ) m~ mp1J1cclt (Q}illl
~illlwfurCQ)illllITill(Qffi[ 1J1illlcdll (Q}ff lb~illl~{ffi1t~ ff~~dw~cdl
o JIilll~~1J1~~ CilLty 1J1illlcdl plL1llbllil~ @'W~~illl~~~ (Q}{f ~li:CQ)fE1O]lW~li:~ff
ff~li:~cdl1J1~1b1wn1b1~~ 1J1illlcdl ~mceillllt ff~cg}_~m~illl~
lQJ(Q)1F}<d[(Q) ~~/~~m<d[(Q)p~1P ~~~~ ~~ 0
~(Q)dJ@ ~~@ThS:J) 1PlQJThS
~TQJ~m~m ~~~~\DTIill(Q)~~ ~A ~ (Q)~ ~ jJ(Q) ~~m@(Q)p~a 0
~~~~(Q)JJ@ mKQ)1F}ThS~Lril1P~ ~W~1IildI 0
~TQJ(Q)~~W plill1ffi(Q):J) hO 0
~@@j~;s ~1ill1]~(O)TITI(O)lli @jlqW ~@j~1ffilh@j(dI
4~TI~~fJl d1@j~If6~1illilll(o)~;S If6 ~1ill1]~~@jd1J
i @J
~
~
~ @J ~
~ i
I ~
v=g ~
~ I
!~
(02) oi
s (900 d9
~ 0 ~
g @~ @ 8
@~ @J
OH ~ @
~ ]~ i
(Q) @J)
~ !
~~ 8
~ @J)~
~
OH fj ~
I @J
(Q ~ @ I
~ o~ @J
~ ~ ! 0 !
g J1
u 8 Q (Q
~ ~ ~
~ @
0 8
~ o~ ~ ~
~ :<;:> (Q
Ql 00 o~ d9 ~
OH @J
U ot~ ~ !
@J) @
~~ ~ ~ ~
~
~i tu@ ~
v=g ~
~@j 8 (Q
~ o~ g t g v:g
~ ~~ U <
0 0 0 0
I
L ___ - - - - -
~
@
~
~
@
~ s
~ g
H oh]
~~
0& s.
~ I
@
~
~
9 ~
U~
~
"d g
@~
~ ~
I~ @)
S ~
~ (02)
~ g
~ ~.
@~
~
<(
@J2)
J t
00 ~
~ ~
$ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ 6~
'I] J i I
I 1 @ ~
19 !t ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
o
o
f
~
G\\
9 0 ~
~
~
f'
@b ~
f@ ~
~ ~
1 ;I 8
~ 1 ~
~ ~ J
t ~ J
(g ~ u
~ 1 ~
~ ~ !
~ ~ o~
~ @ (<<1
]~ :1 'i ~
, .1 .i i
II!!
~ ~ ~
~
~
.1
c=g
~
l?U2l
t
,
~
~
.1
~
~1J[cq}1IilcclI ~~ ~11lNcq}~~~A 0
~lill(Q)1p}~~JJ ~~ ~~~cclIm(Q):J) 0
~~lPlffip~ ~~1(lffi~~JJ ~~(Q)JJcQI WlIDJ~~=~(O)t:q(~ ~U
m~~Lgp~m ~.~ 0
~~~m lPlQJW ~LQITffidI 0
~(QXJ~cclI ~~cclI~:J) 0
~(o)JJcdI ~~~)(illO 0
~~~~JJ(O)JJlillE[ 0
~J1o
lill(Q)~~~1IillPEI 0
~~~LQJ(O)@m(O)~
~~(Q)1ill(Q)JJ ~~lP1Iilp~ ~(Q)JJcd[ ~~~m(Q)~~ ~1]lill11 ~U
~lIffil~~(8I AUmffi ~lPU~~A ~(O)d1cdI
~mm~~lB5TIIr@n ilArg m~ A =?; l[l@~~lflillJI ~TIillL ..
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
~
I
,
I
I
I~
I~
(s0
I~
(ill)
~ (@
~(@
gJ
~ 00
~ @
@)~
~@@ ~
@) o~ ~
J~
o~ @2)
, ~
(Q)oo @2) ~
j <?@ ~ ~ ~
@J ~ ~ ~ ~
I
I@ ~ o~ ~ @2)
o~ ~ ~~
@ ~ ~
~ I ~ ~
~ < H
~ 0 0 0 0 0
lL
riiiiii~
.:1
fl
~ ~ i
, ,JI
.'l
~; ~ ~~,4:
I' ~,
; ,
, '~
, "t,
~ ~~;
,f' ~
,> ,
000 0 000 0
000 0 000 0
~ NaCO <0 ~ N 0
T""" T""" T"""
$ -fa6Je4:> ~14JUOW
"~""; 1<f~>iI- ,Jo'ff'" "
t "\ '! ~.,..,'~_
PUOWP8tj
4enbesSI
8n^8118S
dnlleAnd
PU8SUMO.L
lJOd
UOUJ8^
, lunoV\J
0811!)jnV\J
UOll84S
UOlJ8W8JS
SPUOWP3
S8lJO~eUV
pOOMU UA l
!bJ(jfJ@g@~@W{J) ~U@[flJ{Q)JJ o~
!bJ(jfJ@g@~@W{J) ~U@[flJ{Q)JJ J:{ ff@;gg{& ~@1J!j o~
!bJ(jfJ@g@{fffj~ ~g~[flJ{Q)JJ IX !bJ(jfJ@g@{fffj~ JJ)@(jfJ[flJ&JJ!j J:{ ff@;gg~ ~@1J!j 0&
~tlfltffJfJ(j!b J1@$taJ ~ 0
ff~aJJ&Jgfj)UlV)@@Q) J1j@aJJ[ft)~ /A ff&J:tlg~ ~@tm
~~ ~CQ)~~@~ = ~fifJf!fjtffJfJ(j!b J1@$lW ~
~~~~~W; lP~~.JI V~EI lPlQJ@ ~~pillb ~~W;&
~~~~lb ~~~ JICQ)j ~~~CQ)~ j(Q) lQJCQ)~mlcq~~1I[P ~TIcq~1pffilbg[
o
@)TI~~~ffillbJEI @)t8I ~~ffilW @)~~ 1P~~~
i
!
I
,
!
i
I
I
=
~y
I
99 ~
d9
@) @J ~ ;
VlQ @J
d9 o~ ~ t
~ (g
~ I ~
l@ ~
~ @J e ~
~~ o~ /;:l ~
~
of f
@~ @J
(?@
I i ~ (Q
s (g
I S 99 ~ /;:lU
I g @) j (?@
~ ~1
i ~ (Q
~ o~ os
ro~ erg g @J ~
@J 8 ~ IrfQl 0
~ ~~
~
~ 9 ~
e o~ o~
(?@
~ ~ @J
@J ~ ~
~ ~
@ ~ J
~ ~ ~
~ ~
01 ~ ~
~ ~
. ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
0
0
0
lV21
S
g
OH
~
~
(ill)
~
OH
lV21
S
g
U
~
OH
~
g
~
~
~'" ~
~ i
.g ~
l02l ~o ~
~~! ~
o:~ ~ ~
eN @J)~~
~~ @J.j ~
j ~ ~~" oiQI t:'Qi
v~ A ~ 00
l02l g ~
l02leN ~ ~~ ~ (Q
@d) o~ I?~ ~
~ 0 'I:V<!J l02l
.y ~ ~ ~ ill
~~ ~\SJ ~
8J = @J.j @J.j 0 (!I;j
~ ~ ~ 8 ~
~ 1 ~ o~ iQI
~99 @ @ ~
@J.j @1Jl ~ ~ ~
~o w: ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ o~ ~ ~
"~~~ i~
~~~~u
oS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~o
o
'@
~
~
~
g
~
~
~
~
Qj
~
OH
~
OH
~
~
~
@)
~
i
(2)
~
g
I ro
I
I
I
l____ ~ .~ ~ _~_
II" II
I ( II
I(p ,', ',' , , 'II "
" I I
I I-
I 1-
L I 1-
~,
I~
~ ~ =
~ = ~
E i ~ ~
~ 15 ~ !
~ ~ ~J 0 ~!! I
~ J 1~ 111 @Z
~ 1 11 ~ 111~
= 23 23it2) ~ 23@ 0
~ ~ ~g l ~~ ~
~O
rs
9
~
~
OR
~
OR
~
~
(02j
OR
~
J9
~
(02j
[OOJ
f
~
~
@
~
@
~
t
@
~
g
i
00
~
l02)
~ o~
g ~
J ~
8_ 00
OO~
~ ~
~ ~
@ ~
@2)
o~ ~
g(00)
l02)
@
o~
~
~
9
~ ~ ~
s @ ~
9 @)@) ID
~ ~ ~
~ ~ @
~ J9
,~ rd
~ ~ ~
9 OR
~ ~ I
9 (2) 9
d~g
J
~
o~
00000
WJJr@([IT ~lr~cdI~
@)~l]5Al]5~ ~5)~~~([IT lill(O)~l]5~1]Jilll[ ~~@ ~~ 0
om <3JI@)A1RdI ~@)1[ 0
oy ifA <3 h@)TITIl]5 A ~@lqW@)" 0
(~l]5~lillJill~~) TI @)~lqI@ ~ffi([IT@N[ (3~WIDffi(Q);:j) :>1IJ1WJTI;:j) 0
~5)@~(O)JI@ lill(Q)~~~'BI
~~ :>1I(O)(Q)JI~h\illlQ!1ffi~ (3 ~WIl1TIl(O);:j) ~5)l]5TI;:j) 0
~1ill(Q) ~~Qrw ~1ill@)m@)Q)JI(Q)JJUJTHI
~lQJ(Q)~~~1DlO
TIIQ1lB5~(O)J[cdI J[@)~If6Jffi\lOlilll(o)~~
~@)TI@)$mrw JJdI(O)cdI J(O) 4~~
~
I
I
=
- I
DSHS Contract Number:
CLIENT SERVICE CONTRACT Resulting From Solicijation Number:
~-=,-
DEPAR T OF
SOCiAL &HEALTH
SERVICES Adult Residential Intensive Inpatient
This Contract is between the State of Washington Department of Program Contract Number:
Social and Health Services (DSHS) and the Contractor identified 7458-0
Contractor Contract Number.
below.
CONTRACTOR NAME CONTRACTOR doing business as (DBA)
HIGHLAND COURTE
CONTRACTOR ADDRESS WASHINGTON UNIFORM CONTRACTOR'S DSHS INDEX
BUSINESS IDENTIFIER (UBI) NUMBER
1704 Melody Circle 91-2046822
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
CONTRACTOR CONTACT CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE CONTRACTOR FAX I CONTRACTOR E-MAIL ADDRESS
DSHS ADMINISTRATION DSHS DIVISION DSHS CONTRACT CODe
HRSA DASA 4034
DSHS CONTACT NAME AND TITLE DSHS CONTACT ADDRESS
Edie Henderson, Program Manager Post Office Box 45330
Olympia, Washington 98504-5330
DSHS CONTACT TELEPHONE DSHS CONTACT FAX DSHS CONTACT E-MAIL ADDRESS
(360) 407-0776 (360) 438-8057 hendeem@dshs.wa.Qov
IS THE CONTRACTOR A SUBRECIPIENT FOR PURPOSES OF THIS CONTRACT? CFDA NUMBER(S)
Yes X No
CONTRACT START DATE CONTRACT END DATE CONTRACT MAXIMUM AMOUNT
December 18, 2000 June 30, 2001 $149,854
EXHIBITS. When the box below is marked with a check (.I) or an X, the following Exhibits are attached and are
incorporated into this Contract by reference:
- -
"'j..,. 'It
X Exhibits (specify): Exhibit Ai and Exhibit B \
~;-:;J"{, ,-, - 5:-: .-:_ ':.. ~: ~':'?,:; :.~:~ -7:.'::'>5:~-~-~-:_-r:;.!~,:~-'..; ;~E~1," :-~_~~- '~x :-.~--::: --,- --;-, _ :' __:.:-__c; '''; "_: _ ',_ :_,- ,- .-, \: -:- ';" ",:- - ' ~i:,~-::It=-:- " ./ ;~i'i:' ; :~.o~t~'~:\<<~:i ,~
TQis ~ Gon~~~p~ - c5m~ains~ all-~tt~~term5:~-ri~:99~'~i~i9Xl,~ '~:g_r~~~ upon: by: the,'~a~i~s:>N~:~uiffir ~rl!:h3rs_ta:~8!ng is ::,bf}'}mti:~ < i':'::\~h~
, representatiCms" oral' on:,tfi:erWi.se~ regardinQ:the sUbject-matt,sr:, of this' Contrad shall be aeemed 'to:e~ist d r bind the: parties:-:~
~, ~", .. P _..PH "_'_!.._",' u.-~ .!_r~-___--"_":~~---I- '...., __.;.., ,=~., r" ,'_,;_ _1_...'.,' _" __,"!..__...:. .-:. ': ~"":"-._-_.,Hl . ", ~=-_-:2'I' ..l/.\':l'~'~l''''
J~~ "p~rt.l,e5' ~~g'q!qg: ~~l~w~~rt~n~.tl:i:a.tJhefb~_ye~r~~d -~!1Q ~riderst~n(Hbl~- C9r:itract-a~dJ~ay~-a~ij1~~ty to ~ijteff;in~6' tf;i,',~: :'i~-r ~
-~C~~~~r:r~:\:.~?~:~-;~ :t',:~;~;;~fr-:~:)~-~ :::~~?:t~?~J {;,' )}\~~-:-~~~- ,--:,::;;.-y~:~ c; !-::-:-::f~~::,~;~E ;\;~":-,: :":~ :;;:: ~~~~.~~;- ~ ::~/~~, :'; ":.~; ,~ l!l}f;'!:f :/:; . ,~:~' ;~, t:i~,~W ~ :;\;:;::;:~~;;'~~;
C?;:;;;;'TU~ PRINTED NAME AND TITLE DATE SIGNED
~t:ll!"'r C. H~;; 6~t:. --0, ;.. Ol} z.5 JOI
,
DSHS SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME AND TITLE DATE 91GNED
r:s -..~ G~rr\l I\II=-!!~on z-J ilL:>
C"" 'nr1ir:~tor (
1.1: 1
Utl,':"l\}ll I,';i and G;jt:~:;::~ .^.~~3e / /
(3ell)' 438-cs493
PO"1 ;\51'1
\i,..,vA r.
-- C'-' ~"r- D
R t::, _ t:",.. l '>; I::.- ...),
?{1~
EXEClITED
.JAN 3 0 2001
\
EXHIBIT A
SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
SERVICE
4034 Intensive Inpatient Chemical Dependency Treatment Services for Adults: The
contractor shall provide a concentrated program of individual and group counseling,
education, and activities for detoxified alcoholics and addicts and their families. The
contractor shall provide services in accordance with WAC 440 -22, or its successor, and
with policies and procedures published by the Division of Alcohol and Substance Abuse.
CONSIDERATION
J. REGULAR PATIENTS
The Department shall pay the Contractor $64.04 per day per eligible patient for a
maximum of 2,340 patient days, I ess patient participation and third party liability.
The maximum consideration for this rate is $149,854. These funds include state
funds and Federal Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant funds.
II. The department shall pay the contractor for patient physical examinations in
accordance with procedures described in DASA's residential services vendor payment
system instructions.
11/. Eligible patients are defined as recipients of the department's Alcoholism and Drug
Addiction Treatment and Support Act (ADATSA). I
SERVICE LIMITS
Payment for regular treatment is limited to a maximum of 30 days per admission for each
patient.
Service in excess of this limit for any individual may be authorized by Exception to Policy in
accordance with WAC 388-20 and 388-240 or their successors. In the event that a patient
requires treatment beyond the 30 day limitation, documentation stating the exceptional
nature of the individual's situation must be entered in the patient's clinical records using the
ADA TSA Request for Exception to Policy Form (DSHS 14 -412). A copy of this
documentation shall be forwarded to the patient's referring ADA TSA Assessment Center.
PAYMENT AND BILLING
Social Service Payment System (SSPS): The Contractor shall receive invoices generated by
SSPS. The Contractor shall verify that services stated on the invoices were delivered by
indicating in the total units block of form DSHS 08 -141, or equivalent, that services were
delivered, and shall return the invoices as directed by SSPS. DSHS shall use the verified
SSPS invoice to generate payment to the Contractor. In case of any problem with an SSPS
invoice, the Contractor shall contact the Assessment Center which authorized services to
the client.
Page 2 of 16 Pages
,>:;
Beginning July 1, 2000, the contractor and department will use the Division of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse (DASA's) residential services vendor payment system as described in
procedures distributed by DASA. The Social Service Payment System (SSPS) and A -19
invoicing will no longer be available after that date. References to SSPS and A -19 in this
contract do not apply after June 30, 2000.
Absences exceeding 72 hours are allowable and billable only if they are a condition of
the treatment plan, and approved in advance by the Assessment Center.
Stipulation of Funds: The contractor shall not use funds payable under this Work Order as
match toward federal funds without prior written approval.
Duplication of work: The contractor ensures that work to be performed does not duplicate
work to be charged to the State of Washington under any other contract or agreement with
the contractor.
Complete Payment: The contractor agrees to accept this payment as total and complete
remuneration for services provided to DSHS cl ients. This does not preclude the contractor
from seeking other funding sources, except federal matching funds.
Client Financial Information: The contractor shall cooperate in supplying information to
determine clients' eligibility for federal funding.
Use of Federal Funds: The contractor shall certify that no federal funds payable und er this
contract will be paid by or on the behalf of the contractor, to pay any person for influencing
or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, Me mber of Congress, an
officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of Member of Congress in connection with
the awarding of a federal contract, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of
any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreeme nt.
If any funds other than federally appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with a federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the
contractor shall complete and submit the "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying" in
accordance with its instructions.
Special SAPT Block Grant Restrictions: Contractors may not use federal Substance Abuse
Prevention and Treatment (SAPT) Block Grant funds to:
1. Carry out any program of distributing sterile needles for the hypodermic injection of
any illegal drug or distributing bleach for the purpose 0 f cleansing needles for such
hypodermic injection;
2. Carry out any testing for the etiologic agent for acquired immune deficiency
syndrome (AIDS), unless such testing is accompanied by appropriate pre -test
counseling and appropriate post -test counseling;
3. Provide inpatient hospital services;
4. Make cash payments to intended recipients of alcohol/drug services;
Page 3 of 16 Pages
5. Purchase or improve land, purchase, construct or permanently improve (other than
minor remodeling) any building or other facility, or pure hase major medical
equipment;
6. Satisfy any requirement for the expenditure of non -federal funds as a condition for
the receipt of federal funds; or
7. Provide any financial assistance to any entity other than a public or non -profit .private
entity.
SERVICE LEVEL MAINTENANCE
The Contractor shall provide no less than 85 percent of contracted beds during any three
month period of the term of this agreement.
If the level of service provided by the Contractor in any quarter falls below the limit specifie d
above, DSHS reserves the right to unilaterally reduce the maximum patient days payable
under this agreement.
The Contractor shall establish management procedures to ensure that billings for patient
services:
a. do not exceed the maximum consideratio n in this agreement, and
b. are maintained at a consistent level so that patient days are not depleted or. under
used. The intent of this provision is to ensure consistent availability of services
throughout the term of this agreement.
EVALUATION
DASA Management Information System: The contractor shall participate fully and
completely in the DASA Management Information System, TARGET, as prescribed by
DASA. Participation shall include the prompt and orderly submission of all required data,
completed in the detail and submitted in the manner and time frames prescribed by DASA.
The contractor shall also provide any other reports in time frames and formats as prescribed
by DSHS.
NON-COMPLIANCE
Recovery of Fees: If the contractor bills and is paid fee s for services that the Department
later finds were (a) not delivered or (b) not delivered in accordance with applicable
standards, the Department shall recover the fees for those services and contractor shall fully
cooperate during the recovery.
Refusal of Further Contracts: If the contractor's Work Orders are terminated for default, the
Department may declare the contractor ineligible to contract with the Department, in whole
or in part, for a period to be determined by DSHS.
Stop Placement: The department may stop the placement of clients in a treatment facility
immediately upon finding that the Contractor or Subcontractor is not in compliance with
provisions of the basic contract or work order.
Page 4 of 16 Pages
, 'I'
I '....'
1 -:"\1;.("
Additional Remuneration Prohibited: The Contractor shall not charge or accept additional
remuneration from any client or relative, friend, payee, guardian, or attorney of the client, or
any other person, for service provided under this contract other than those specifically
authorized by the Department. In the event the Contractor charges or accepts prohibited
remuneration, the Department shall have the right to assert a claim against the Contractor
on behalf of the client, for double the amount charged. Any violation of this provision shall
be deemed a material breach of this contract.
The Contractor shall not be precluded from making reasonable additional charges for
personal items and services, which have been approved in writing by the Department.
Purchase of these services or items from Contractor mu st be optional and must be agreed to
in writing by the patient or his representative and the agreement filed in the patient's file
maintained by the Contractor.
SUB-CONTRACTING
The contractor shall obtain written, advance approval from authorizing progr am before sub-
contracting.
Subcontractor Duplication of Work: The contractor ensures that work to be performed
under any sub-contract does not duplicate work to be charged to the State of Washington
under any other contract or agreement with the subcontr actor.
The contractor assumes all responsibility for the actions of any subcontractors pursuant to
subcontracts entered into under this Work Order.
CREDENTIALS AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
The Contractor shall obtain and/or comply with the following:
Necessary license/registration/certificationas required by law and DSHS policy.
Background check/criminal history clearance required for all employees who have
unsupervised access to DSHS clients, as required by law and DSHS policy .
Liability insurance protecting the department
Industrial Insurance: The contractor shall comply with the requirements of Washington
state's industrial insurance law, Title 51 Revised Code of Washington.
Client Abuse: The contractor shall report all instances of suspected clie nt abuse to D SHS in
accordance with state law and DSHS policy.
Peer Review Required: The SAPT Block Grant requires annual peer reviews of at least five
percent of treatment contractors receiving federal block grant funds. When sufficient
numbers of such providers do not volunteer, DASA will determine who shall participate in
the peer consultation/review program each year. .
Page 5 of 16 Pages
DUI Non-Reporting: In the event that a Contractor or Subcontractor is fined for not reporting
patient noncompliance with treatment a s ordered by a court under RCW 46.61.5056(4), and
the action is not under appeal, and the Contractor or Subcontractor does not pay the fine
within 30 days of notification, funds equal to the amount of the fine will be withheld from
the next payment to the Contractor or Subcontractor.
Program Requirements:
The Contractor shall:
A. Provide services in accordance with the technical specifications of it's proposal
submitted for the department's client services solicitation No. 991344 titled" Adult
Residential Chemical Dependency Treatment Services" or in accordance with
mutually agreed program specifications.
B. Accept for admission all patients referred from an assessment center. The only
exception may be cases in which there are specific documented rea sons relative to
the health, welfare, or safety of patients. The contractor shall not establish any ,
other policy limiting admission of an eligible client unless it is approved in writing by i I
OASA. Any unresolved dispute between a referring assessment cent er and the
contracting facility shall be presented to the OASA Regional Administrator.
C. Prioritize services to ensure admission to:
1. Pregnant Women
2. Intravenous Drug Users (IOU's).
3. Parents with children in the home.
4. Child Protective Service (CPS) referrals.
5. SSI recipients.
D. The Contractor shall have a policy which requires that efforts be made by persuasion,
or other nonforcible means, to keep a patient in the treatment facility until such time
as he/she has completed treatment and is disch arged or transferred.
E. The Contractor shall have a policy which requires that the chemical dependency
treatment administrator, or other specifically designated persons employed at the
agency, notify the committing authority if a court -committed, or court-mandated,
patient leaves the facility without authorization, or fails to report for treatment. The
Contractor shall notify the committing authority by telephone no less than 24 hours
after the patient leaves the facility or fails to report for treatment, a nd shall send a
written notice of the patient's actions to the committing authority within two
working days after the patient leaves treatment, or fails to appear for treatment.
Such notification shall be done in accordance with the federal confidentialit y
regulatjons (42 CFR, Part 2).
Page 6 of 16 Pages
F. The Contractor shall have a policy which establishes that the administrator, or other \
designated persons employed at the agency, may authorize a patient to leave the j
facility for the purposes of obtaining medical treatme nt not available at the center, ;
conducting personal business, visiting with family members or significant others, and i
for other reasons which may be beneficial to the patient's treatment program. The
following information shall be obtained by the facility each time a patient is
authorized to leave the center:
1. Patient's name.
2. Date and time of departure.
3. Patient's destination, including a phone number.
4. Date and time of planned return.
5. Purpose of trip.
6. Date and time patient returned.
G. The Contractor shall immediately terminate a patient and notify the Assessment
Center in writing of such termination upon absence of the patient from the facility
when the absence is in excess of 72 hours and is not a condition of the patient's
treatment plan. Absences exceeding 72 hours are allowable if they are a condition of
the treatment plan, and approved in advance by the Assessment Center.
H.' The Contractor shall report ALL admissions and incidents of discharge into the
TARGET system and simultaneously to the Assessment Center in writing within five
days of discharge using DASA approved ADMISSION/DISCHARGE VERIFICATION
FORM (DSHS 14-312 (X)). A copy shall also be forwarded at the same time to the
DSHS Community Services Office (CSQ) responsible for authorizing the outpatient
treatment stipend.
J. The Contractor shall maintain individual financial records for all patients who request
the facility in writing to retain or spend money on their behalf. Such accounts shall
be kept current and in det ail and contain supporting verification, consents, and
receipts for all monies received and disposed of. Funds in excess of those reasonably
needed to meet patient cash needs shall be deposited in a bank account, separate
and apart from other bank accounts of the facility. The Contractor shall maintain
receipts signed by the patient where' patient funds are delivered to the patient in a
lump sum. The patient shall have the right to make other arrangements for the
management of funds at any time. Problems of financial mismanagement in
individual cases, which cannot be resolved by advice and counseling, shall be
referred to the Department for resolution. This paragraph does not apply to ADA TSA
Treatment Stipends or to ADA TSA Shelter Assistance.
J. Subject to written conditions provided by the Department, the Contractor shall allow
the patient unrestricted use and custody of the clothing, personal items, and
incidentals allowance and all exempt funds possessed.
Page 7 of 16 Pages
K.
The Contractor shall provide or arrange th e provision of transportation of patients for
emergency medical care and, subject to program requirements, to day treatment and
training programs outside the Contractor's facility. Patients shall not be required to
use personal and incidental funds for su ch purpose, unless the patient has earnings
from a paid workshop program, which have been approved in writing for such use by
the Department.
- I _
L.
----.,
The Contractor shall accept any patient involuntarily committed by a court pursuant '
to RCW 70.96A, or it's suc cessor, provided that the patient is deemed to be .
medically appropriate for the level of care provided under this contract and has been
determined eligible by DSHS for services under this contract.
M.
The Contractor shall obtain and maintain a current cop y of WAC 440-22 or its
successor and shall comply with the requirements therein for services provided under
this contract.
SLEEPING ARRANGEMENTS FOR ADULTS AND MINORS IN SAME FACILITY
A. Adults and minor children who are housed in mixed facilities have special needs.
Whenever possible, minor patients should be roomed with other minors and adult
patients roomed with other adults. Adult is defined as a person who is 18 years of
age or older. A minor is anyone who is not an adult. Patients 1 5 years of aa e and
younQer shall not room with adults.
Such room assignments will help to assure that minor patients have the optimal
opportunity to associate with other patients of similar developmental age and
interests. Appropriate room assignment is also a preve ntative measure to avoid
creating a social and physical power imbalance which could contribute to physical or
sexual abuse.
B. Whenever adults and minors share sleeping rooms, the contractor shall make a
written narrative assessment of all adults and mino rs who share sleeping facilities
with the following criteria in order to determine the most appropriate sleeping
accommodations. The assessment shall be filed in each patient's clinical record:
Age, background, functioning, and stability of the adult/mi nor patient, including:
a. Ability to relate to adults/minors.
b. History of being a victim of physical and/or sexual abuse or neglect.
c. Cognitive development and ability to express and advocate for self.
d. History of being a perpetrator of violent behavior and/or of sexually deviant
behavior.
e. Ability to respond to program rules governing contact between adult/minor
patients.
Page 8 of 16 Pages
, .
C. If the patient is 15 years of age or younger, the patient shall not be assigned to a
sleeping room with another perso n who is 18 years of age or older without a written
exemption from the Director of DASA in accordance with WAC 440 -22 or its
successor. To obtain an exemption, the facility shall submit a written request to the
DASA Youth Program Manager.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AGENCIES TREATING INTRAVENOUS DRUG USERS
A. The Contractor shall develop, implement and operate programs of treatment for drug
abuse, with admission priority to intravenous drug users and individuals infected with
the etiological agent for acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS).
B. Contractors must provide outreach to drug users for the purpose of encouraging such
individuals to undergo treatment.
C. Residential treatment facilities must notify DASA when they reach 90 percent
capacity.
AUDITING AND COST RECOVERY
For federal audit purposes, the contractor is paid as a vendor under this agreement.
All fiscal and clinical records pertaining to services delivered under the terms of this
agreement shall be maintained for a minimum of six years. The Contractor shall comply
with all State and Federal requirements regarding the confidentiality of client records
including, but not limited to, the Federal Regulations for the Confidentiality of Alcohol and
Drug Patient Records, 42 CFR Part 2.
Page 9 of 16 Pages
EXHIBIT B
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Definitions. The words and phrases listed below, as used in this Contract, shall
each have the following definitions:
a. "Central Contract Services" means the DSHS Office of Legal Affairs, Central
Contract Services, or successor section or office.
b. "Contract" means the entire written agreement between DSHS and the
Contractor, including any Exhibits, documents, and materials incorporated
by reference.
c. "Contracting Officer" means the Contracts Administrator, or successor, of
DSHS Central Contract Services or successor section or office.
d. "Contractor" means the individual or entity performing services pursuant to
this Contract and includes the Contractor's owners, members, officers,
directors, partners, employees, and/or agents, unless otherwise stated in
this Contract. For purposes of any permitted Subcontract, "Contractor"
includes any Subcontractor and its owners, members, officers, directors,
partners, employees, and/or agents.
e. "DSHS" or "the department" or "the Department" means the State of
Washington Department of Social and Health Services and its employees
and authorized agents.
f. "Personal Information" means information identifiable to any person,
including, but not limited to, information that relates to a person's name,
health, finances, education, business, use or receipt of governmental
services or other activities, addresses, telephone numbers, social security
numbers, driver license numbers, other identifying numbers, and any
financial identifiers.
g. "RCW" means the Revised Code of Washington. All references in this
Contract to RCW chapters or sections shall include any successor, amended,
or replacement statute.
h. "Regulation" means any federal, state, or local regulation, rule, or ordinance.
i. "Subcontract" means any separate agreement or contract between the
Contractor and an individual or entity ("Subcontractor") to perform all or a
portion of the duties and obligations that the Contractor is obligated to
perform pursuant to this Contract.
j. "WAC" means the Washington Administrative Code. All references in this
Contract to WAC chapters or sections shall include any successor,
amended, or replacement regulation.
Page 10 of 16 Pages
2. Advance Payment and Billing Limitations.
a. DSHS shall not make any payments in advance or anticipation of the
delivery of services to be provided pursuant to this Contract.
b. DSHS shall pay the Contractor only for authorized services provided in
accordance with this Contract. If this Contract is terminated for any reason,
DSHS shall pay only for services authorized and provided through the date
of termination.
c. Unless otherwise specified in this Contract, DSHS shall not pay any claims
for payment for services submitted more than twelve (12) months after the
calendar month in which the services were performed.
d. The Contractor shall not bill DSHS for services performed under this
contract, and DSHS shall not pay the Contractor, if the Contractor has
charged or will charge the State of Washington or any other party under any
other contract or agreement for the same services.
3. Assignment. The Contractor may not assign this Contract, or any rights or
obligations contained in this Contract, to a third party.
4. Compliance with Applicable Law. At all times during the term of this Contract, the
Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and
regulations.
5. Confidentiality. The Contractor may :use Personal Information and other
information gained by reason of this Contract only for the purpose of this Contract.
The Contractor shall not disclose, transfer, or sell any such information to any
party, except as provided by law or, in the case of Personal Information, with the
prior written consent of the person to whom the Personal Information pertains.
The Contractor shall maintain the confidentiality of all Personal Information and
other information gained by reason of this Contract, and shall return or certify the
destruction of such information if requested in writing by DSHS.
6. Contractor Certification Regarding Ethics. The Contractor certifies that the
Contractor is in compliance with Chapter 42.52 RCW, Ethics in Public Service, and
shall comply with Chapter 42.52 RCW throughout the term of this Contract.
7. Contractor Not an Employee of DSHS. For purposes of this Contract, the
Contractor acknowledges that the Contractor is an independent contractor and not
an officer, employee, or agent of DSHS or the State of Washington. The
Contractor shall not hold the Contractor or any of the Contractor's employees out
as, nor claim status as, an officer, employee, or agent of DSHS or the State of
Washington. The Contractor shall not claim for the Contractor or the Contractor's
employees any rights, privileges, or benefits which would accrue to an employee of
the State of Washington. The Contractor shall indemnify and hold DSHS harmless
from all obligations to payor withhold federal or state taxes or contributions on
behalf of the Contractor or the Contractor's employees, unless otherwise specified
in this Contract.
Page 11 of 16 Pages
8. Debarment Certification. The Contractor certifies that the Contractor is not
presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or
voluntarily excluded from participating in this Contract by any Federal department
or agency. If requested by DSHS, the Contractor shall complete a Certification
Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility, and Voluntary Exclusion form. Any
such form completed by the Contractor for this Contract shall be incorporated into
this Contract by reference.
9. Disputes. Either party who has a dispute concerning this Contract may request an
adjudicative proceeding. The amount of any rate set by law, regulation, or DSHS
policy is not disputable. A request for an adjudicative proceeding must:
a. be received by the Office of Financial Recovery (OFR) at Post Office Box
9501, Olympia, Washington 98507-9501 no later than twenty-eight (28)
calendar days after Contract expiration or termination;
b. be sent by certified mail (return receipt) or other manner that proves OFR
received the request;
c. include a statement explaining the party's position; and
d. include a copy of this Contract.
Timely and complete requests may be scheduled for a formal hearing by the Office
of Administrative Hearings. The Contractor may be offered a pre-hearing or
alternative dispute resolution conference in an attempt to resolve the dispute prior
to the hearing.
10. Execution, Amendment, and Waiver. This Contract shall be binding on DSHS only
upon signature by DSHS. This Contract, or any provision, may be altered,
amended, or waived by a written amendment executed by both parties, except that
only the Contracting Officer or the Contracting Officer's designee has authority to
waive any provision of this Contract on behalf of DSHS.
11. Governing Law and Venue. This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the
State of Washington. In the event of a lawsuit involving this Contract, venue shall
be proper only in Thurston County, Washington.
12. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The Contractor shall be responsible for and
shall indemnify and hold DSHS harmless from all liability resulting from the acts or
omissions of the Contractor and any Subcontractor.
13. Inspection; Maintenance of Records.
a. During the term of this Contract and for one (1) year following termination
or expiration of this Contract, the Contractor shall give reasonable access to
the Contractor, Contractor's place of business, client records, and
Contractor records to DSHS and to any other employee or agent of the State
of Washington or the United States of America in order to monitor, audit,
and evaluate the Contractor's performance and compliance with applicable
laws, regulations, and this Contract.
Page 12 of 16 Pages
b. During the term of this Contract and for six (6) years following termination
or expiration of this Contract, the Contractor shall maintain records
sufficient to:
(1) Document performance of all acts required by law, regulation, or this
Contract;
(2) Substantiate the Contractor's statement of its organization's
structure, tax status, capabilities, and performance; and
(3) Demonstrate accounting procedures, practices, and records which
sufficiently and properly document the Contractor's invoices to DSHS
and all expenditures made by the Contractor to perform as req uired
by this Contract.
14. Nondiscrimination. The Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state,
and local nondiscrimination laws and regulations.
15. Notice of Overpayment. If the Contractor receives a Vendor Overpayment Notice
or a letter communicating the existence of an overpayment from DSHS, the
Contractor may protest the overpayment determination by requesting an
adjudicative proceeding pursuant to RCW 43.208.
16. Obligation to Ensure Health and Safety of DSHS Clients. The Contractor shall
ensure the health and safety of any DSHS client for whom services are provided by
the Contractor.
17. Order of Precedence. In the event of an inconsistency in this Contract, unless
otherwise provided herein, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving
precedence, in the following order, to:
a. Applicable federal, state, and local law and regulations;
b. The terms and conditions of this Contract; and
c. Any Exhibit, document, or material incorporated by reference.
18. Ownership of Material. Materials created by the Contractor and paid for by DSHS
as a part of this Contract shall be owned by DSHS and shall be "works for hire" as
defined by the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976. This material includes, but is not
limited to: books, computer programs, documents, films, pamphlets, reports,
sound reproductions, studies, surveys, tapes, and/or training materials. Material
which the Contractor uses to perform this Contract, but which is not created for or
paid for by DSHS, is owned by the Contractor; however, DSHS shall have a
perpetual license to use this material for DSHS internal purposes at no charge to
DSHS.
19. Severability; Conformity. The prOVISions of this Contract are severable. If any
provision of this Contract is held invalid by any court, that invalidity shall not affect
the other provisions of this Contract and the invalid provision shall be considered
modified to conform to existing law.
Page 13 of 16 Pages
20. Single Audit Act Compliance. If the Contractor is a subrecipient of federal awards
as defined by Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133, the
Contractor shall maintain records that identify all federal funds received and
expended. Such funds shall be identified by the appropriate OMB Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance titles and numbers, award names and numbers, award
years, if awards are for research and development, as well as names of the federal
agencies. The Contractor shall make the Contractor's records available for review
or audit by officials of the federal awarding agency, the General Accounting Office,
DSHS, and the Washington State Auditor's Office. The Contractor shall
incorporate OMB Circular A-133 audit requirements into all contracts between the
Contractor and its Subcontractors who are subrecipients. The Contractor shall
comply with any future amendments to OMB Circular A-133 and any successor or
replacement Circular or regulation.
If the Contractor is a subrecipient and expends $300,000 or more in federal awards
from any and/or all sources in any fiscal year beginning after June 30, 1996, the
Contractor shall procure and pay for a single or program-specific audit for that
fiscal year. Upon completion of each audit, the Contractor shall submit to the
DSHS Contact named in this Contract the data collection form and reporting
package specified in OMB Circular A-133, reports required by the program-specific
audit guide (if applicable), and a copy of any management I~tters issued by the
auditor.
21. Subcontracting. Except as otherwise provided in this Contract, the Contractor may
not subcontract any of the contracted services without the prior, written approval
of DSHS. The Contractor shall be responsible for the acts and omissions of any
Subcontractor.
22. Survivability. The terms and conditions contained in this Contract that by their
sense and context are intended to survive the expiration or termination of this
Contract shall so survive. Surviving terms include but are not limited to:
Confidentiality, Disputes, Indemnification and Hold Harmless, Inspection,
Maintenance of Records, Notice of Overpayment, Ownership of Material,
Termination for Default, Termination and Expiration Procedure, Treatment of Assets
Purchased by Contractor, and Treatment of DSHS Assets.
23. Termination Due to Change in Funding. If the funds DSHS relied upon to establish
this Contract are withdrawn or reduced, or if additional or modified conditions are
placed on such funding, DSHS may immediately terminate this Contract by
providing written notice to the Contractor. The termination shall be effective on
the date specified in the notice of termination.
24. Termination for Convenience. DSHS may terminate this Contract in whole or in
part when it is in the best interest of DSHS by giving the Contractor at least thirty
(30) calendar days' written notice. The Contractor may terminate this Contract for
convenience by giving DSHS at least thirty (30) calendar days' written notice
addressed to DSHS at the address listed on page 1 of this Contract.
Page 14 of 16 Pages
.'" 1.... ~:.
, "
25. Termination for Default. The Contracting Officer may terminate this Contract for
default, in whole or in part, by written notice to the Contractor if DSHS has a
reasonable basis to believe that the Contractor has:
a. Failed to meet or maintain any requirement for contracting with DSHS;
b. Failed to ensure the health or safety of any client for whom services are
being provided under this Contract;
c. Failed to perform under, or otherwise breached, any term or condition of this
Contract; and/or
d. Violated any applicable law or regulation.
If it is later determined that the Contractor was not in default, the termination shall
be considered a termination for convenience.
26. Termination and Expiration Procedure. The following provisions apply if this
Contract is terminated or expires:
a. The Contractor shall cease to perform any services required by this Contract
as of the effective date of termination or expiration. If the Contract is
terminated, the Contractor shall comply with all instructions contained in the
notice of termination.
b. The Contractor shall immediately deliver to the DSHS C<:>ntact named in this
Contract, or to his or her successor, all DSHS assets (property) in the
Contractor's possession, including any material created under this Contract.
The Contractor grants DSHS the right to enter upon the Contractor's
premises for the sole purpose of recovering any DSHS property that the
Contractor fails to return within ten (10) calendar days of termination or
expiration of this Contract. Upon failure to return DSHS property within ten
(10) calendar days, the Contractor shall be charged with all reasonable costs
of recovery, including transportation. The Contractor shall protect and
preserve any property of DSHS that is in the possession of the Contractor.
c. DSHS may withhold a sum from the final payment to the Contractor that
DSHS determines necessary to protect DSHS against loss or additional
liability.
d. The rights and remedies provided to DSHS in this paragraph are in addition
to any other rights and remedies provided at law, in equity, and/or under
this Contract, including consequential damages and incidental damages.
The Contractor may request dispute resolution as provided in this Contract.
27. Treatment of Assets Purchased by Contractor. Title to all assets (property)
purchased or furnished by the Contractor is vested in the Contractor and DSHS
waives all claim of ownership to such property.
Page 15 of 16 Pages
, .
28. Treatment of Client Assets. Unless otherwise provided in this Contract, the
Contractor shall ensure that any adult client receiving services from the Contractor
under this Contract has unrestricted access to the client's personal property. The
Contractor shall not interfere with any adult client's ownership, possession, or use
of the client's personal property. The Contractor shall provide clients under age
eighteen (18) with reasonable access to their personal property that is appropriate
to the client's age, development, and needs. Upon termination of this Contract,
the Contractor shall immediately release to the client and/or the client's guardian or
custodian all of the client's personal property.
29. Treatment of DSHS Assets. Title to all assets (property) purchased or furnished by
DSHS for use by the Contractor during this Contract term shall remain with DSHS.
The Contractor shall protect, maintain, and insure all DSHS property in the
Contractor's possession against loss or damage and shall return DSHS property to
DSHS upon Contract termination or expiration.
30. Waiver of Default. Waiver of any breach or default on any occasion shall not be
deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach or default and shall not be
construed to be a modification of the terms and conditions of this Contract.
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Page 16 of 16 Pages
,
WAC 388-240-2300 ADATSA categorical eligibility.
~~
--
1. A person eligible for ADA TSA services shall:
a. Be eighteen years of age or older;
b. Be a resident of Washington as defined by the GAU program; and
c. Be either a United States citizen or alien who:
i. Is lawfully admitted for permanent residence;
ii. Is otherwise permanently residing in the United States under color of
law; or
iii. Has been granted temporary residency status under the Immigration
Reform and Control Act.
d. Provide the department with the applicanfs Social Security number. If the
applicant cannot finish [sic] a Social Security number because it has not
been issued or is not known, the applicant shall apply for a number before
authorization of assistance. The applicant shall provide the Social Security
number to the department upon receipt.
e. Meet the same income and resource criteria as required by the ceneral
assistance-unemplovable (GA-U) program; except persons excluded from
GA-U under WAC 388-235-9000, because they are clients of federal aid,
may be eligible for ADA TSA treatment services.
2. A person placed in an alcohol or drug congregate care facility shall meet the
payment and procedural requirements set forth in WAC 388-15-568 or its
successor. However, the department shall not require a client receiving services in
~an intensive inpatient chemical dependency treatment program of thirty days or
~!s to partiCipate in the cost of care.
3. The department shall require a client with income while residing in a recovery
house, extended care recovery house, or long-term care or drug residential
treatment facility to contribute toward the cost of care of that portion of their
income in excess of the clothing and personal incidental standard. This
participation shall:
a. Begin the month following the month of admission; and
b. For benefits, be computed by the department according to applicable rules
for the program under which the benefits are received.
WAC 388-240-6100 ADATSA protective payee.
1. The department shall pay the assistance needs of an ADA TSA client receiving
outpatient treatment or shelter assistance by protective payee or vendor payment.
The protective payee for: .
a. An outpatient client shall be the same agency providing outpatient
treatment;
b. A shelter client in independent housing shall be an agency under contract
with the department to provide intensive protective payee services
described under subsection (5) of this section; and
c. A shelter client residing in a contracted shelter facility shall be the facility
operator. The facility operator shall have the authority to use personal
discretion on the method of disbursing the client's clothing and personal
incidental money each month.
2. The protective payee for the outpatient client shall:
a. Have the authority and responsibility to make decisions about the
expenditure of outpatient treatment stipends;
b. Encourage the client to participate in the decision-making process. the
amount of decision-making the protective payee allows the client shall
depend upon the level of responsibility the client demonstrates; and
c. Disburse funds to meet the basic needs of a clienfs shelter, utilities, food,
clothing, and personal incidentals.
3. The outpatient protective payee may use discretion on the method of disbursing to
http://www.wa.gov/dshs/EAZManuaVSectionslCD_ADATSA~eneral.htm
~L~
3/19/01
.
-.
the client any cash balance remaining from the client's monthly assistance
warrant. The protective payee has the authority to apportion ~ny remaining funds
to the client at regular intervals throughout the month.
4. The intensive protective payee shall provide to a client case management services
to include, but not be limited to: .
a. Disbursement of a payment for shelter and utilities, such as a check directly
to the landlord, mortgage company, utility company, etc;
b. Direct payment to vendors directly for goods or services provided to or for
the recipient, including personal and incidental expenses; and
c. An exception only where unusual circumstances prevent direct payment
and the recipient is unlikely to divert the money to purchasing alcohol or
drugs.
5. A shelter client in independent housing has the right to request a change of an
intensive protective payee within the county if dissatisfied with the department's
selection of a particular intensive protective payee. If the department determines
good cause exists for the payee change, the department shall reassign the client
to another intensive protective payee, if available.
6. In the event the client or protective payee relationship is terminated for any
reason, the protective payee shall return any remaining funds to the department.
http://www.wa.gov/dshs/EAZManuaI/Sections/CD_ADATSA.....general.htm
3/19/01
.
.
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FORTANGELES
, --
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
June 5, 2001
MA YOR DOYLE AND CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utility Services
Downtown Water Main and Sidewalk Reconstruction PH. II , Project 99-11;
Acceptance of Project and Release of Retain age
Summary: Primo Construction Co., Inc. has completed all work associated with the project.
This completes the second phase of replacing the water mains and sidewalks in our downtown
district. All work associated with the project has been inspected and accepted as complete.
Final payment has been made.
Recommendation: Accept the project as completed by Primo Construction, and authorize
the release of the total retain age held in escrow in the amount of $64,904.96 upon receipt of
clearances from the Departments of Revenue and Labor and Industries.
Background / Analysis: Primo Construction, Inc. has completed the water main and sidewalk
replacement on Front 8t. and Laurel St. as defined in the contract documents. This project was
budgeted at $1,300,000. Funding was provided through a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
loan ($1,030,000) with the balance from water utility funds.
The original contract amount was $909,307.10 and the final contract, including change orders in
the amount of$255,065.76, was $1,164,372.86. Increased unit quantities totaling $133,726.38
were added to this amount. The final contract amount is $1,298,099.24.
Change order work included added water main and sidewalk on the eastern side of Laurel
St.($140,000), increased traffic control requirements($70,000), and sewer main repairs and misc.
($46,000). The unit quantity variation consisted primarily of increased excavation and backfill
and added fuel tank removal.
This project along with the initial phase has been recognized in both Washington State and
nationally as the American Public Works Association "Project of The Year" in its category.
Original Contract Change Orders Unit Quantity Final Cost Project Cost
Amount (3) Variations Variance
$909,307.10 $255,065.76 $133,726.38 $1,298,099.24 30.0%
N \PROJECTS\99-11 \CCacpt wpd
7
.
.
.
8
.
.
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FORT,ANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
June 5, 2001
MA YOR DOYLE AND CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utility Services
"A" Street and Grant Avenue Water Main Improvements, Project 20-12;
Acceptance of Project and Release of Retainage
Summary: Babbitt Construction, Inc. has completed all work associated with the project. All
work associated with the project has been inspected and accepted as complete. Final payment
has been made.
Recommendation: Accept the project as completed by Babbitt Construction, and authorize
the release of the total retain age held in escrow in the amount of $9,337.77 upon receipt of
clearances from the Departments of Revenue and Labor and Industries.
-.-
Back~round / Analvsis: Babbitt Construction, Inc. has completed the water main replacemel1t
work on "A" Street and Grant Avenue as defined in the contract documents. The original
contract amount was $172,964.78. Change orders in the amount of$20,937.68 were added to
the contract and unit quantities totaling $1,697.16 were deducted from the Gontract. The final
contract amount is $192,205.30.
Change order work included additional quantities of excavation due to unsuitable soils,
additional gravel shoulder, added asphalt prelevel work and an adjustment for an increase in
prevailing wage rates that occurred between solicitation of bids and bid opening.
Original Contract Change Orders Unit Quantity Final Cost Project Cost
Amount (3) Variations Variance
$172,964.78 $20,937.68 ($1,697.16) $192,205.30 11%
N \PROJECTS\20-12\CC_June5.wpd
9
.
.
.
10
.
.
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
June 5, 2001
MAYOR DOYLE AND CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
Award of Contract Lauridsen Blvd./Edgewood Dr. Realignment Project
Summary: Bids were opened for the Lauridsen B1vd./Edgewood Dr. Project on May 29, 2001.
The bids have been reviewed and DelHur Industries, Inc. of Port Angeles is considered to be the
lowest responsible bidder.
Recommendation: Award and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract for the Lauridsen
Blvd./Edgewood Dr. Realignment Project No. 91-07 to DelHur Industries Inc. of Port
Aneeles in the amount of $950,589.91.
Back~round / Analvsis:
Bids were opened and read for the Lauridsen Blvd./Edgewood Dr. Project at 1 :00 pm May 29,
, 2001 in the City Council Chambers. Three bids were received and DelHur Industries, Inc. was
the apparent low bidder with a bid of$950,589.91.
The bids were reviewed and DelHur Industries, Inc. has been determined to be the lowest
responsible bidder.
The results shown below have been corrected as needed in accordance with the specifications:
Contractor
City
Bid Amount (including tax)
Primo Construction, Inc.
Port Angeles, W A.
Sequim, W A
Port Angeles, W A.
$950,589.91
$975,538.80
$1,072,886.94
$1,173,824.25
DelHur Industries, Inc.
Bruch & Bruch Const., Inc.
Engineers Estimate
It is recommended that the contract be awarded to DelHur Industries, Inc. of Port Angeles, W A.
N \PROJECTS\91-07AR\MEMOS\2CCAward wpd
11
.
.
.
12
.
.
.
CALL TO ORDER -
REGULAR MEETING:
ROLL CALL:
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE:
CEREMONIAL
MATTERS &
PROCLAMATIONS:
WORK SESSION:
LATE ITEMS TO BE
PLACED ON THIS OR
FUTURE AGENDA:
FINANCE:
Contract A ward for Francis
Street Park
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
May 22, 2001
Deputy Mayor McKeown called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles CIty Council
to order at 6:00 p.m.
Members Present
Deputy Mayor McKeown, Councilmembers Campbell,
Enckson, Hulett, and Williams.
Members Absent.
Mayor Doyle and CouncIlman WIggins.
Staff Present
Manager Quinn, Attorney Knutson, Deputy Clerk
Broussard, B. Collins, M. Connelly, G. Cutler, D. McKeen,
Y. Ziomkowski, G. Kenworthy, L. Dunbar, S. McLam, M.
Hughey, and 1. Harper.
Publzc Present:
G. Powell and L. Lee.
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mr. Terry Roth.
None.
None
The matter of changing an upcommg CIty Council meetmg date was added as Agenda
Item 1.4.
A request for a Public Works Trust Fund loan was added as Agenda Item 1.5.
Gerald Powell, 718 Ehzabeth Place, addressed the CIty CouncIl on the pendmg
litIgatIOn with Highland Courte. Mr. Powell cited various areas m whIch HIghland
Courte has VIolated the CondItIonal Use Permit, and he expressed hIs dIspleasure that
the faclhty was allowed to remam open during the appeals process.
On another matter, Mr. Terry Roth adVIsed the CouncIl that on Memorial Day there will
be two ceremomes takmg place. One IS at 10:30 a.m. at 3rd and FranCIS, and the other
IS at 12:00 p.m. at Veterans Park. At thIS ceremony, there wIll be a dedIcatIOn of the
monument to Pnvate 1 st Class RIchard Anderson who received the Medal of Honor m
World War II. Mr. Anderson's farruly hved m Clallam County for 20 years. Mr. Roth
mVlted the City Council to attend the dedIcatIon ceremony at Noon. The only survIvor
from Mr. Anderson's troop will be present at the ceremony.
1. FranCIS Street Park Contract Award
Deputy Mayor McKeown summarized the staff memorandum m regard to the
recommended approval of the contract WIth Pnrno ConstructIon for the FranCIS Street
- I -
13
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
May 22, 2001
FINANCE:
(Cont'd)
Contract A ward for FranCIS
Street Park (Cont'd)
Black DIamond Reservoir
Improvements
Waterlme Replacement &
Street RepaIrs
ReImbursement of Costs
ASSOCIated with Water
Supply MItIgatIOn
Measures
14
Park Improvements Councilman WIllIams requested that a map of the Improvements
be dIsplayed and, WIth the use of the overhead projector, Parks DIrector Connelly
explamed the Improvements bemg Implemented The current plan IS to create parkmg
with a mam pedestrIan access down the traIl and to have handIcap accessIble parkmg
midpomt down the traIl. DIrector Connelly pomted out the locatIon of the flag plaza.
There was brief dIScussIon on the placement of a flag plaza as opposed to play
sculptures for chIldren, and Director Connelly pointed out that at a future date
sculptures could be an addItion to the park. Councilman Williams questIoned the SIZe
of the avaIlable roads. DIrector Connelly indIcated he would return WIth the requested
informatIon.
.
Councilman Hulett moved to approve the contract for the Francis Street Park
improvements to Primo Construction, Inc., of Sequim, Washington, in the total bid
amount of$338,239.62 which includes the additive flag plaza; to approve the added
2001 CFP project funding in the amount of $140,000; and to authorize the Mayor
to sign the contract. The motion was seconded by Councilman Campbell and
carried unanimously.
2
Contract awarded for the Black Dzamond ReservOIr Cover
Deputy Mayor McKeown summarIZed the memorandum from the DIrector of PublIc
Works & UtilitIes concernmg approval of the contract for the Black DIamond ReservOIr
Improvements WIth Snelson Compames, Inc. Councilmember Erickson moved to
approve the contract for the Black Diamond Reservoir improvements to Snelson
Companies, Inc., ofSedro-Woolley, Washington, in the bid amount of$963, 967.94
and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Campbell and carried unanimously.
3 Contract Change Order for 8th Street Restoration Project
.
Deputy Mayor McKeown revIewed the memorandum the Director of Public Works &
UtIlItIes concernmg a contract change order with Lakeside Industries for the 8th Street
restoratIon, addmg a waterline replacement and street repaIrS plus five addItIonal
workmg days to the contract. DIrector Cutler added that the waterlme damage was
WIthin a questIOnable tIme penod, as the damage could be earthquake related. PublIc
Works IS currently seekmg FEMA's aid WIth thIS unexpected SItuatIon.
Councilmember Erickson moved to approve a written finding of the existence of
an emergency, waive competitive bid requirements, and approve proceeding with
Contract Change Order No.4 to the Lakeside Industries contract for the 8th Street
restoration, which will add waterline replacement and street repairs in the amount
of$56,503.00 and 5 added working days. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Hulett and carried unanimously.
4. Contract With NatIOnal Park Service for Direct Costs Assoczated with Water
Supply Mitigation Measures
Deputy Mayor McKeown summamed the memorandum from the Director of PublIc
Works & UtIlItIes on the matter of a contract with the National Park Service for direct
costs associated with dam removal. Director Cutler added that the contract IS for the
stated amount, and the NatIonal Park ServIce can modify It up to $500,000.
Councilman Campbell moved to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract with the
National Park Service for direct costs associated with dam removal that were
incurred prior to October 31,2000, in the amount of $218,953.50; authorize the .
City Manager to sign future modifications to the contract; and authorize the
Director of Public Works & Utilities to sign the appropriate representations and
- 2 -
.
.
.
Reimbursement of Costs
Associated with Water
Supply Mitigation
Measures (Conl'd)
Rescind Bids for
Laundsen Bou]evard /
Airport Road RealIgnment
Project
CONSENT AGENDA:
CITY COUNCIL
COMMITTEE
REPORTS:
ORDINANCES NOT
REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
ImplementatIOn of a Net
Metenng Program
Ordinance No. 3080
" ,
, ,
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
May 22,2001
. ~c , .
~ ,,:',
certification, and invoice the Park Service for reimbursement of current and future
costs. The motion was seconded by Councilman Williams and carried
unanimously.
5 Rescmd Bzdsfor Laurzdsen Blvd/Azrport Road Realzgnment Project
Deputy Mayor McKeown reviewed the mformanon from the Director of PublIc Works
& Utihnes pertaIning to rescmdmg the preVIOUS deCISIon to award Pnmo ConstructIon
the contract for the Laundsen Boulevard/AIrport road realIgnment project Director
Cutler explamed that, after extensive diSCUSSion With Washmgton State Department of
TransportatIOn, due to the City not including the proper forms needed to make the bid
packet complete, all bids mu~t be rejected and re-advertlsed This must be done m order
to keep federal funding.
Councilman Hulett moved that the Council rescind its previous decision to award
the contract to Primo Construction and to reject all bids for the project. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Campbell and carried unanimously.
Councilman Campbell moved to accept the Consent Agenda to include, 1) City
Council mmutes of the May 2, 2001 regular meetmg, and 2) Check List - May 1],200]
- $1,426,308 98. The motion was seconded by Councilman Williams and carried
unanimously.
Councllmember Enckson had no report
CouncIlman WillIams attended Port Angeles Works', UtIlIty AdVISOry, and Real Estate
Committee meetings At the Real Estate CommIttee meeting, there were Citizens m
attendance wantmg to restore the Port Angeles underground Councilman Williams was
also In attendance at two Gateway meetings and a Downtown Forward meeting, both
of which are progressing In theIr goals.
CounCilman Campbell hIghlIghted hIS recent VISit to Port Angeles' Sister City In Japan
Included In the tour of Mutsu City, the group VISIted the $20 MIlhon Mutsu MUnICipal
Library and the Mutsu SCience Museum. CounCilman Campbell and others were
allowed to partIcipate In therr Annua] Frrefighnng Day, mvo]vmg speeches. ceremomes
With demonstranons ofpumpmg water, and a parade Mutsu IS a City of 50,000 people.
and In 1960, It was formed by the merger of two cities. The Mutsu City Fmance
Drrector mformed Councilman Campbell that the budget IS $200 rru]lIon which does not
Include water/sewer/electnc. There IS publIc housmg that IS part of the City'S revenues
CounCilman Hulett Informed the CounCil that the Ctty CounCil now has a voting
po sinon on the Chamber of Commerce Board of Drrectors C]allam County Will have
voting representation on the Board as well.
Deputy Mayor McKeown reported that she represented the City at the recent Sequlm
Imgal10n Festival She was also In attendance at the Downtown Forward and Gateway
Committee meetings
Ordmances Not Requmng Publzc Hearmgs
1 Implementmg A Net Metermg Program
Deputy Mayor McKeown summanzed the memorandum submitted by the Director of
PublIc Works & UtilIties In regard to Implementation of net metenng PublIc Works
& Utlhtes DIrector Cutler stated that ElectrIcal Engineering Manager Jim Harper was
present to address any questIOns the CouncIl may have In general, the OrdInance
- 3 -
15
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
May 22, 2001
ORDINANCES NOT
REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
(Cont'd)
ImplementatIOn of a Net
Metenng Program
Ordinance No. 3080
(Cont'd)
WIthdrawal of Food Bank
Street Vacation PetitIOn
Outdoor Burmng
ModIficatIOns
16
permits those generatIng power withIn. th€E City to hook up and use what power they can
use and then feed it back into CIty systemS. It IS an expensIVe, yet economIcal process
CouncIlman WillIams asked If there was a way to offer an incentIve for customers who
stay connected to the gnd for the CIty to receive power from therr generation. He was .
concerned for customers generating more power than they use. Mr. Harper added that
there are possible credits available with BP A. These credits are still being researched,
and will be mcorporated into the incentives upon further research.
Councilmember Enckson departed the Council Chambers at 6.50 p.m.
Councilman Campbell concurred WIth CouncIlman WIllIams, that It IS great to see the
State promotIng dIstnbuted generatIon Deputy Mayor McKeown read the Ordmance
by title, entItled
ORDINANCE NO. 3080
AN ORDINANCE of the CIty of Port Angeles, Washmgton, establIshmg
polIcies and procedures for customers of the CIty'S electrIC utIlIty to
operate electric generated faCIlItIes of not more than 25 kIlowatts and
amending Ordinance 2341 as amended and Chapter 13.10 of the Port
Angeles MunicIpal Code.
Councilman Williams moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. Councilman
Hulett seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
CouncIlmember Enckson returned to the Council Chambers at 6:53 p.m.
2. Withdrawal of Food Bank Street VacatIOn Petltion
Deputy Mayor McKeown summanzed the memorandum proVIded, and DIrector Collms .
stated that thIs vacatIon was referred back to the Real Estate Comrrnttee who concluded
that the vacatIon was not needed. Therefore, Councilman Williams moved to accept
the withdrawal of STY 01-01 as requested by the City of Port Angeles and the Port
Angeles Food Bank and not act to vacate Fourth Street west of Valley Street as
originally proposed. The motion was seconded by Councilman Campbell which
carried unanimously.
3
Housekeepmg ModificatIOns to Outdoor Burmng Ordinance
Deputy Mayor McKeown summanzed the memorandum from FIre ChIef McKeen WIth
regard to outdoor burnmg proVISIons of the Washington Clean AIr Act.
CouncIlmember Erickson departed the Council Chambers at 6:54 p.m.
Fire Chief McKeen stated that these changes are deSIgned to bnng the City's Ordinance
m compliance with State law. There IS one prOVISIOn m the Ordinance that allows the
Frre Department to charge mdivIduals If they need to respond to an Illegal burn ThIS
fee is not mtended to be used unless there IS an mdivldual who conSIstently does not
comply WIth the Ordmance There was bnef dISCUSSion as relates to the Urban Growth
Area.
CouncIlmember Erickson returned to the CouncIl Chambers at 6:59 p.m.
Councilman Campbell stated that the Ordmance references residential burning, yet he
observed there was no mention of prohibiting the burning of household waste. Chief .
McKeen responded that the defmItlon was taken out of the WAC concernmg what IS
prohIbIted from burnmg; however, an addItion can be made to the language. He
- 4-
.
.
.
ORDINANCES NOT
REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
(Cont'd)
Outdoor Burnmg
Modifications (Cont'd)
RESOLUTION:
Support of
TelecommUnICatIOns
CompentIon
Resolution No. 9-01
OTHEW'
CONSIDERATIONS:
Energy ConservatIon Plans
USDA Service Agreement
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
May 22, 2001
\ ,
mdicated there can be more research ~n the language used in the WAC, and the
Ordmance can be rewntten to be more consIstent WIth that language.
By consensus, the Ordmance was tabled and wIll be returned to the CouncIl at a later
date.
ResolutIOn Supportzng TelecommUnicatIOn CompetitIOn
Deputy Mayor McKeown summanzed the memorandum from Manager Qumn m regard
to supporting QWEST's re-entry mto the lnterlocal access and transport area long-
dIstance busmesses. Manager Qumn added that the Resolunon was bemg proposed not
by means offavorinsm to QWEST, but m an effort to help them make a case before the
FCC. Deputy Mayor McKeown read the Resolution by ntle, entitled
RESOLUTION NO. 9-01
A RESOLUTION of the City CouncIl of the CIty of Port Angeles, Washmgton,
m support of telecommunications competInon.
Councilman Hulett moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. Council member
Erickson seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
1 Conservation Plans and Publzclty
Deputy Mayor McKeown reVIewed the mformatIOn from Pubhc Works & UtIhtIes In
regard to approVIng a budget adjustment and granting the DIrector of Pubhc Works &
UtihtIes the authonty to enter Into CIty-authonzed contractor agreements. Power
Resources Manager Dunbar and staff have been workIng dIhgently on 5 conservatIOn
programs that wIll be Implemented In June, to Include a Conservanon Awareness
Program, Energy & Water Conservanon Program, Compact Flourescent Lamp Program,
BUIldmg Improvements Program, as well as a program for City facihtIes. The reason
needed for the contract IS for the City to be enabled to regulate the programs WIth the
BP A standards. Councilman Wilhams asked If the contractor agreement was
conSIdered by the UtIhty AdVISOry CommIttee, WhIch Mr Dunbar confirmed that It
was. Councilman Williams asked If this IS being implemented WIth the hope that BPA
will refund the money to the City. Mr. Dunbar stated that these programs comcIde WIth
the needed 10% energy cutback that has been requested by Bonneville. If the plans are
implemented qUIckly, then the CIty will be somehow be treated more favorably.
Ken Lostrom, Penmsula Heat Company, offered comments regardIng the programs
being implemented. He Just received the packet with the heat pump gUIdelInes and had
around twenty pertment quesnons Director Cutler referred Mr Lostrom to Mr Dunbar
for clarificanon on the proposed plans.
Councilman Williams moved to approve a budget adjustment for conservation
programs to $380,000 for the year 2001, authorize the Director of Public Works
& Utilities, or his designee, to enter into City-authorized contractor agreements,
and authorize the payment of conservation measures available under the City's
Conservation Programs to a maximum of $20,000 per payment. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Campbell and carried unanimously.
2. Cooperative Service Agreement with US Department of Agrzculture
Deputy Mayor McKeown reviewed the information provided by Pubhc Works &
UtIhtes DIrector Cutler m regard to wIldlife control operatIons m the landfill area.
- 5 -
17
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
May 22,2001
OTHER
CONSIDERA nONS:
(Cont'd)
USDA Service Agreement
(Cont'd)
Fiber Optics Business Plan
Change in City Council
Meetmg Date
Public Works Trust Fund
Loan Apphcatlon
18
Councilman Campbell moved to a,uthorize the City Manager to sign the
Cooperative Service Agreement with tlie United States Department of Agriculture
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services (WS), to provide
wildlife control operations in the area of the landfill. The motion was seconded by .
Councilman Hulett and carried unanimously.
3. Fiber Optic Backbone DeSIgn Engineering Services Agreement with MCC
Deputy Mayor McKeown summanzed the memorandum from Pubhc Works & UtIhtes
Director Cutler m regard to the FIber OptIC Backbone Design Engmeenng ServIces
Agreement. DIrector Cutler stated that thIS plan had already been presented to the Port
Angeles Works' Comrmttee and the Utihty AdViSOry CommIttee. Power Resource
Manager Dunbar submitted a power pomt presentatlon to the Council and dIstnbuted
report summanes. He noted there IS a strong need and mterest for advance broadband
telecommumcatlons; the rmSSIon of thIS project IS to ensure broadband
telecommumcations m Port Angeles m 2002 by enabling the necessary infrastructlrre.
The rmssion WIll be met by enablmg a feasible infrastructure project with the greatest
potentlal for economic development success. Three alternatlves have been researched,
aside from the City working on its own. All of these alternatlves are fmancially feaSIble
by usmg a pubhc fmanctal model. Mr. Dunbar dIsplayed a graph that showed the level
of fmancIal requIrements that would be necessary depending on the chosen alternatIve
The least economIC benefit would come if the CIty worked on thIS project alone,
without the support and help of others. A bnef overvIew was given on the strategIC
directlon overview of the project. The City has been evaluating broadband
telecommumcations servIces for a few years now, and it is being proposed that this
project moves forward with another step.
Councilman Campbell added that thiS project had considerable mput from the Port .
Angeles Works! Comnuttee, as well as the UtIhty AdViSOry Comnuttee, both of which
have gIven it a strong backmg. CounCilman Wilhams concurred WIth thIS statement
Councilman Campbell moved to approve the business plan, rescind the fiber optic
backbone design engineering services agreement with MCC, and authorize the
Mayor to sign consulting services agreements with Metropolitan Communications
Consultants and Dow, Cogburn and Friedman The motion was seconded by
Councilman Williams and carried unanimously.
4
CIty CounCIl Meetmg Changed to June 18.2001
Councilman Williams moved to shift the regular City Council meeting from June
19,2001 to June 18, 2001, at 6:00 p.m.. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Hulett and carried unanimously.
5.
PWTF Loan Application for Phase III of Downtown WatermamlS,dewalk
Replacement Project
Manager Qumn stated that Mr. Kenworthy was distribunng a memorandum WIth regard
to the Downtown Watermam Project and a loan applIcatIon previously subrmtted but
not granted. DIrector Cutler mdicated that it had been suggested to re-package the
applIcatIOn with more emphaSIS on the watermain as opposed to the SIdewalks. Once
approved for the deSIgn, then constructIon would take place shortly thereafter
Councilman WIllIams asked for more details on Laurel Street. Mr. Kenworthy stated
that thIS WIll not be a part of Phase III of the Watermam Project.
.
Councilman Hulett moved to authorize the Mayor to sign the PWTF loan
application certification in the amount of$1,500,000 for Phase ill of the Downtown
- 6 -
.
.
.
OTHER
CONSIDERATIONS:
(Cont'd)
Pubhc Works Trust Fund
Loan ApphcatIon (Cont'd)
INFORMATION:
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
RETURN TO OPEN
SESSION:
Accept 9th and Race Street
Parcels of Property for Sale
ADJOURNMENT:
: ~~,: !,-,
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
May 22, 2001
J. ',:':
Watermain/Sidewalk Replacement Project and further, if the loan is approved,
authorize the Mayor to execute the PWTF loan agreement provided that the loan
amount does not exceed $1,500,000. The motion was seconded by Councilmember
Erickson and carried unanimously.
Deputy Mayor McKeown reminded everyone of the Memonal Day ceremony at
Veterans Park. She also stated that the Park's Department was gIven a thank you from
the Umted States Marine Corps League. Pubhc Works & UtIhtes DIrector Cutler stated
that, In observance of Pubhc Works Week, there would be refreshments served at the
CorporatIon Yard at 11 :30 a.m on May 23,2001, and 2:00 p.m. on the same day at City
Hall.
The meeting adjourned to Executive SeSSIOn at 8:05 p.m to discuss potentIal htIgatIOn
and real estate for 30-45 minutes.
The meetIng returned to Open Session at 8:43 p.m.
Councilmember Erickson moved to accept the 9th and Race Street parcels of
property for sale with an offer of $17,000 each. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Hulett and carried unanimously. It was agreed that the Mayor or the
CIty Manager are authorized to SIgn the sale documents.
The meeting adjourned at 8:44 p.m.
Larry Doyle, Mayor
Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk
- 7 -
19
.
.
.
20
.
.
.
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
May 25, 2001
TO:
MAYOR DOYLE AND CITY COUNCIL
Dan McKeen, Fire Chief O.A.-a-
FROM:
SUBJECT:
City Open Burning Ordinance
Summary: Beginning January 1,2001, outdoor burning provisions of the Washington Clean Air Act
took affect, prohibiting all outdoor burning of yard debris and land clearing debris in Port Angeles.
This permanent burn ban necessitates rescinding the City's current ordinance which provides
guidelines and fees relating to outdoor burning which is no longer allowed by state law. A new
ordinance consistent with the Washington Clean Air Act is submitted for the Council's consideration.
The attached ordinance is a re-submittalfrom the May 22nd Council meeting. Language was added
that identifies materials prohibited in outdoor burning in addition to the materials identified in the
"residential" and 11and clearing" definitions. Also included is language describing allowable
I~ecreational "outdoor burning. The Fire Department feels this added language will help clarify
those items which are banned from outdoor burning, and provide information on outdoor burmng
that is allowed
Recommendation: Adopt the attached ordinance pertaining to outdoor burning which is consistent
I with the Washington State Clean Air Act.
Background/Analysis: On January 1, 2001, the state imposed a permanent outdoor burning ban
prohibiting the burning of all yard debris and land clearing debris in Port Angeles and its adjacent urban
growth areas. This bum ban is the result of the Washington Clean Air Act (WAC 173-425), which in
part limits outdoor burning in an effort to protect public health.
With the state's adoption and implementation of the outdoor burning ban, the City's existing ordinance
P AMC 14.21.060 pertaining to outdoor burning is no longer applicable. The Fire Department
recommends rescinding the existing ordinance 14.21.060, and adopting a revised ordinance that
complies with the 1991 Washington Clean Air Act and its related burning regulations.
The Fire Department's role regarding the bum ban will continue to focus on education, along with
exploring alternatives to outdoor burning. In the event an indIvidual repeatedly fails to comply with the
bum ban, the proposed ordinance will allow the issuance of a citation to assist the City in recovering
a portion of the costs associated with responding to and controlling the situation.
DM/cw
21
.
.
.
22
ORDINANCE NO.
.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, revising the
City's outdoor burning regulations, amending Ordinance 2552 as
amended, Ordinance 2932, and Chapters 3.70 and 14.21 of the Port
Angeles Municipal Code.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1.
Ordinance 2552 as amended and Chapter 14.21 of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code are hereby amended by repealing PAMC 14.21.060 and adding PAMC 14.21.061
to read as follows:
14.21.060 Open nUl.nins Limitations - nUdling Permits Required.
A. No garbage, dead animals, or materials containing asphalt, petroleam products,
.
paint, 1 ubbcl products, plastics, papcl (other than what is necessary to start a file), caldboald, treated
wood, constmction debris, metal, 01 an} substance which emits dense smoke, toxic emissions, or
any substancc which emits densc smoke or obnoxious odors will be allowed to be bUIllCd.
n. Natural v Ggetation such as bl ush, kaves and trce trimmings, may bc bmll.ed upon
private property in accordance with the regulations of the rort Angeles Pile Depaltmcnt upon
obtaining a pelmit from thc Pile Depaltment as plovided in Sections C and D.
C. A one-day pe,Iluit f"l open bUlning of natural vGgGtation for a fire that w ill be
no larger than foUl fect in diamctGl shall be, issued by the rOlt Angeks File DGpartment vel bally,
by contacting the. Pile Depaltme.nt at 417-4655, and leaving the applicant's nam" and address.
D. A written pClmit, good for a fivc-day period, is requircd f"l open buwing of
natmal "egctatioll for a fire that vv ill bc largel than foUl fcet in diameocl and shall be issued only
.
- 1 -
23
17Z
4It -c-
UVIIs OlTjt 'aunv'J
, , P-puvI v UfO TJ UOI1VP'a ^
. 'J IVltllVU 'JIll 'P?
'I'!'gjO <1!::l p~uill" u'"q ~,,~oq 01".1'(1 . L
, P I~q~O 10 P!tt:) 'JITd 'JI r,(
oq" OI'OOl"Oo , . II q pOO?mopp SV P""
_,0 1II11'0l! 0 .,,'Oploq
tI1 01 IV1U'JWIIPP' OllU'" 100.,OP
. . q 1'100010 IU'" ,( ~
_ , '':I '0jU! ,(IqoUO..' wn - .11._0 . 0' pU11 ,." ,(V.do'd
q.. 10 ''lOW' '1II11 pol.l ~ ',IOqq1!!'U "'II! M
. I ,n u!lx~ ')q IIvtIs ,)Ig ')l.{l. '9
p~p~v ~
lop puv 'J'JnnUI'Jd 'J
. 1II ,(q oodn poonl. ,( 'luop!'OI
,q lI'lljU'" =
lI"q' 1II1'!Oq 1!'1II OIIlllU-"UI1n"p ,q oOll!"'''d '1II10 ,"",ax"lII III 1'''''''0{
. PI"O' I"q 01
POluown,op oou,!',dx, 1'100' I "'O!"!"" "'{"U" "Ill wOI.J "OllSlp ,(
oq" 00" p,p, . . 10lllIjds01
~.J ,)IIl jO SlH'JP!~'J"M
'~
')tI1 jO Dqumu 'JUOI d
I pU11 'w.u '1II pIl.ll UUlq P "~!",lOd
ISU' 'UOlllIO.oq
4It ' I "~IOO IP!qM 'pooqlOqq:1j?u '1"!P'WWI 'q 110 uO!lll11lp pIl.ll 'W!! "I"P 'ql 'P"PUI
pop a . I II! ""0111'0 .
_ !'o' ,q I'"W "nou U'II! 1 M ';'I',M '00 'Old . q pun · IOU" OOUIoq OP'll!w',a O'll ,(q
I. UInq?lop ~u!ltI'a!I Ol IO!IJ
'P~St1 ~q
l~mu ~uvJ o~l.
'F
'[
,
1u~ml lvd~a
,)l!d ,)IH loplM ~
U!lV'J!UUUfUlO? TO
;:r SUV~W v ') ^ VI
I lsmu ,)'JllHUI')d
, . ')l.{l. 'Z
1UOUTl H?d')p 'JIg 'J r,(
'n" u'"q ?ljI1" "'UIIPUOllllIUl!1'UOOlI!"lno"'n..~ q po'!"bOl "lU'Wli!ob. "".""" 'P!" ~U01'
VtI lSUUI ~~~l!UTT')d 'Jl{l.
'I
~tll IHI M 'Id
wo, U.... pUI1 'IOjOl""P HI I ' .SV',"'?J!JW" ~'~"OIlOJ
, . ,'J?,t Q,lUOM~ p~~::l
I!WIOa 'Ill ""OS " o"ob x, OJ 10" 'I!a '1~U1' ·
. ') I IIVtIS UOlP'JSq"O . 10 I'!WO' 'IUUS
. _ "'lI 01 lUll a " ,
:3111101' .OWI . ..w POlI'O'''" 01
. .1 U' '" Ol!' UO POU!IllUIUUI 'q .!l '1~:J W"!I'lOdo Sunnoq
. IIVl{S SUOIWltl~ .
eO'lI!'M "11. .,<U', PO'>llIO' . 01 pUll I!Um" ~"?'mq "odo
, po!"d 'lljWO..'IU 10 ''lIl0 ,(do.
lU,"ry'ua'G,n ,( , 9 poP"Olxooq .(ow ponod
.:1 q """pll U! .UlOq I>Z . 1!IUIO" OlLL .pwo",d
p'Jlnp~lps 'UO!P~dSUT ')lIS-
_ . ,UO lIV :to u d
, O!PI mo'J uodn
.
be. lcquire.d to dry to the. minimum kvd ne.eeS5ary to fadlitate dean burning as determined by the
Fir" Chief or othcr designated City official,
8. Durning shall not OG(,til when we.ather conditions ale. such that an
invelsion layel would be er(,ated.
c. The. fee for btlIning pelmits issued pmsuant to this Se(,tion shall be as set forth
in Chapter 3.70 fAMC. (Ord. 2932 ~36 (part), 10/11/96, Ord. 2910 ~2 (palt), 3/15/96, Ord. 2781,
~1, 10/15/93, Old. 2552 ~4, 10/25/89, Ord. 2582 ~1, 4/25/90.)
14.21.061 Outdoor Burnin2 Re2ulations.
A. Recreational fires and other outdoor burning. as defined in this Section. are allowed.
1. "Recreational fires" means cooking fires. campfires. and bonfires. using
charcoal or firewood that occur in designated areas or on private property. for
cooking. pleasure. or ceremonial purposes. Fires used for debris disposal
purposes are not considered recreational fires. Recreational fires shall comply
with the following:
a. The pile size of a recreational fire shall not exceed three feet in
diameter and two feet in height and shall not be located within 25 feet
of a structure or combustible materials unless contained in a barbeque
niL
b. Recreational fires shall be constantly attended by a person who has
approved fire-extinguishing equipment readily available. Approved fire
extinguishing equipment includes buckets. shovels. garden hoses. or a
fire extinguisher with a minimum 4A rating.
2. "Other outdoor burning" means any type of outdoor fire that is not
.
.
- 3 -
25
prohibited in this Section and that is allowed in Chapter 173-425 WAC. Other
outdoor burning includes. but is not limited to. any outdoor burning necessary .
to protect public health and safety.
B. Residential burning. land clearing burning. and burning banned materials. as defined
in this Section. are prohibited.
1. "Residential burning" means the outdoor burning of leaves. clippings.
pruning and other yard and gardening refuse originating on lands immediately
adjacent and in close proximity to a human dwelling and burned on such lands
by the property owner or his or her designee.
2. "Land clearing burning" means outdoor burning of trees . stumps. shrubbery.
or other natural vegetation from land clearing projects (i.e. projects that clear the
land surface so it can be developed. used for a different purpose. or left unused).
3. "Burning banned materials" means outdoor burning of garbage, dead.
animals. materials containing asphalt. petroleum products. paint. rubber
products. plastics. paper (other than what is necessary to start a recreational
fire). cardboard. treated wood. construction/demolition debris. metaL or any
substance which emits dense smoke. toxic emissions. or obnoxious odors.
C. If the Fire Department is called to respond to. controL or extinguish an illegal or out
of control fire that is prohibited by this Section. the City may charge. and recover from the person
responsible for the fire. the costs of the Fire Department's response and control action.
Section 2.
Ordinance 2932 as amended and Chapter 3.70 of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code are hereby amended by amending PAMC 3.70.090 to read as follows:
3.70.090 - Fire Department Fees
.
-4-
26
-.., .,.
A. Inspection Fees. When the following inspections are required to be performed
pursuant to the Uniform Fire Code, the fees for such inspections shall be as set forth below:
1. Welding and cutting inspections for activities ofthe following duration:
.
a.
Up to 5 days
6 to 30 days
31 to 90 days
91 to 180 days
181 to 365 days
b.
c.
d.
e.
$ 50.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
500.00.
Welding and cutting activities extending beyond one year shall be required to renew any
required permits and pay inspection fees in accordance with the above schedule.
Marine fueling operations inspections
- reinspections
Place of assembly inspections
Liquid petroleum gas tank and piping
installation and inspection
2.
.
3.
4.
$25.00
15.00
25.00
35.00.
The following fees shall be a one (1 )-time fee for initial installation plan review and
inspection:
5. Underground storage tank removal and installation inspection:
commercial
residential
100.00
15.00
6. Automatic fire sprinkler installation inspection and testing:
multi-family 50.00
commercial 100.00
.
- 5 -
27
Fire alarm plan review
Fire alarm installation inspection and testing:
plus $10 for each additional zone
9. Hood/duct system plan review
10. Hood/duct system inspection and test
The following fees shall be in addition to other required fees:
7.
8.
11.
Inspections outside normal business hours
50.00
100.00
.
15.00
25.00
$35.00 per hour
conducted by non-uniformed personnel (minimum charge 1 hour)
outside of8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday-
Friday and on holidays
$35.00 per hour
(minimum charge 1 hour)
Reinspections for non-compliance
with Uniform Fire Code (after first
two inspections to ensure reasonable
progress is being made toward compliance)
D. Durning rermitPees. Pccs for burning permits issued pursuant to rAMC 14.21.060
shall be, as follows.
12.
.
1. One-day, font f~et in diametel fire No charge
2. Fi~c-day, tw fGet in diame,tc,l file, 25.00
J. five-day, twe,nty fr.et in diametel file 80.00
€B. Medical records. Duplicating and/or searching. In accordance with RCW
7.02.010(12), the charges for duplicating and/or searching for medical records shall be as follows:
1. Duplication charges 0.74/pageforfirst30 pages
.57/page all other pages
28
- 6 -
.
.
2. Clerical Fee for searching and handling 17.00
(Ord. 3034 91 (part), 11/26/99; Ord. 2993 6/12/98, Ord. 293297, 10/11/96)
Section 3 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after the date of
publication.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council
held on the day of June, 2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary
F \ORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONSI200l-17 ord wpd
.
- 7 -
29
.
.
.
30
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
JUNE 5, 2001
MAYOR DOYLE AND CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Facilities Plan
(CFP) Public Hearing
Summary: The State requires that the City annually update the TIP for planning and funding
of transportation related projects. A public hearing is required to receive input regarding projects
and additions to the TIP. The TIP projects are also included in the transportation element ofthe
CFP and it is important that we also take public comments on the CFP.
Recommendation: Pass the attached resolution to set a public hearing for June 18,2001
to receive ublic in ut re ardin the TIP and CFP for the ears 2002 thru 2007.
. Back~round / Analysis: Annually the City is required by the State to update the TIP for
planning and funding of transportation related projects. The projects to be included in the TIP
cover the next six year period. The state will not fund projects that are not included in the TIP.
The projects included in the TIP do not have to be currently funded and the majority included in
the TIP are not. In that the projects included in the TIP are also included in the transportation
element of the CFP it is important that we also take comments on the CFP. The CFP is a project
planning tool which covers all aspects of infrastructure planning within the City and is utilized to
plan for growth in the Urban growth area as well. Projects in the CFP should be currently funded
or have the source of potential funding identified. A TIP/CFP workshop for the City Council
will be held on June 18,2001.
.
N \PWKS\ENGINEER\6- YEAR\2000TIPI. WPD
31
RESOLUTION NO.
.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, setting a public hearing date for review of the Six-year
Transportation improvement Program (TIP) and Transportation Element
of the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) for the years 2002-2007.
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.77.010 and RCW 36.81.121, the City of Port Angeles
is required to review its TIP annually; and
WHEREAS, the CFP may be revised once a year in accordance with the State's Growth
Management Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port
Angeles, Washington, that the City Council will hold a public hearing on the proposed TIP/CFP for
2002-2007 on the 18th day of June, 2001, commencing at 7:00 p.m. or soon thereafter at 321 East
Fifth Street, Port Angeles, Washington. .
All written and oral comments on the proposed TIP/CFP will be considered.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 5th day of June, 2001.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
F \ORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONS\R2001 07 wpd
.
-1-
32
2001
CAPIT AL
FACILITIES
PLAN
June 18,2001
.
2001 GOVERtlNT AL FUND PROJECTS
.
NOTES CITY TOTAL CITY REVISED ADDITIONAL TOTAL -
PRIORITY CFP PROJECT PROJECT 2000 . 2002 2001 BUDGET FUNDS NEEDE[ CITY FUNDS FUNDING
# COST COST ALLOCATION 2001.2002 2001.2002 SOURCE
1 TR61-99 8th Street Reconstruction 2,500,000 90,000 255,000 0 255,000 GF / PWTF
2 TR40-99 Laundsen Blvd/Airport Road Realignment 2,123,000 90,000 0 0 o GF IT I B ITEA-21
3 GG12-99 Laurel St Slide Repair 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 200,000 GF / Streets
4 PK01-00 FranCIS Street Improvement 437,000 50,000 50,000 140,000 190,000 GF / Parks & Rec / TEA-21
5 GG13-99 Downtown Convention Center 4,000,000 40,000 40,000 0 40,000 GF / Pnvate
6 GG03-00 Gateway Parking 2,000,000 90,000 45,000 45,000 90,000 GF / Pnvate / Pkg Rev
Moved to CL GGea-OO Fibre OptlC5 4,000,000 ~ 0 0 o GF / Public ',!'.'orks Elec Utility
7 GG05-00 Marketing Del GUZZI 40,000 " 40,000 40,000 -40,000 o LID Guaranty
200,000 library Bond 8 GG02-99 Renovate Carnegie library 1,200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 400,000 GF Pnvate
Moved to WW ~ Cro'''n Pari'. Storm Ouerflo'll 400;000 400;000 0 0 o GF I Puellc Worl{s
9 PK15-99 Pool Enhancements 2,800,000 225,000 225,000 0 225,000 GF / Parks & Rec / Bond I Other
Moved to WW 9R04-W LlAceln Street Storm Drain aoo,ooo 400;000 0 0 o GF .' P'NTF
Need Grant approval 10 TR42-99 Laundsen Blvd Bndge Widening 2,820,000 185,000 0 444,000 444,000 GF / BRA C
SUB TOTAL OF 2001 CITY PROJECTS 1,650,000 1,055,000 789,000 1 ~844,000
2
3
4
5=3+4
11 FR01-01 Replace SCBA Compressor 32,000 16,000 16,000 GF
12 GG08-99 City Server & Software Upgrades 500,000 100,000 100,000 GF/IT/Utllitles
13 TR30-99 8th Street Bndge Replacement Study 150,000 150,000 150,000 GF
14 TR03-01 Paving/Chip Seal Program 1,500,000 250,000 50,000 50,000 Real Estate EXCise Tax
Used In Front Sidewalk 15 PK16-99 Street Trees - City East Entrance 75,000 75,000 25,000 25,000 50,000 GF / Parks & Rec
16 TR20-99 Street Bicycle Facllitles/Racks/Stnplng 102,000 42,000 2,000 20,000 22,000 GF / Public Works
17 TR26-99 ADA Curb Ramps 100,000 60,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 GF / Public Works
18 GG01-00 City Pier Dredging & Piling Replacement 125,000 40,000 125,000 125,000 GF / Public Works
Construct In 2004 19 TR18-99 Lincoln/Blvd Rechannelizatlon & Signal 453,000 0 25,000 25,000 GFITIB
20 GG10-99 Valley Creek Restoration 30,000 10,000 '10,000 GF/Rotary/Elwha Tnbe
SUB TOTAL OF 2001 CITY PROJECTS 467,000 47,000 541,000 588,000
'TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL PROJECTS
2,117,000l
1,102,0001
1,330,000l
2,432,0001
GG01-01 Laurel St Stairs Repair 225,000 GF
PK98-99 Remodel/Expand Fine Arts Center 650,000 GF/Flne Arts Center Foundation
PK23-99 Centenmal Trall-ITT to Lees Crk 250,000 ISTEA Grant
PK25-99 Waterfront Trail-Valley Crk 150,000 ALEA GrantlCommumty
GG02-01 Laurel St Pavers 350,000 GF
GG02-00 Manne life Center 5,050,000 GF / Parks & Rec / Grants / Bonds
Funds to be allocated:
Available from $1,650,000
Available from 2000 Surplus
Available from 2001 unfinished Street Projects
TOTAL
595,000
600,000
135,000
1,330,000
n Icfp/01 project order,xls
.
.
.
PROJECT TOTAL
PRIORITY ID PROJECT TITLE PROJECT
COST
GENERAL PROJECTS
1 GG12-99 Laurel St Slide Repair 200,000
2 GG02-99 Renovate Carnegie Library 1,200,000
3 GG01-01 Laurel St. Stair Repair 225,000
4 GG05-00 Marketing Del GUZZI Dr Property 40,000
5 GG06-00 Gateway Sign at Deer Park 60,000
6 GG10-99 Valley Creek Restoration 30,000
7 GG08-99 City Server & Software Upgrades 500,000
8 GG13-99 Downtown Convention Center 4,000,000
9 GG02-00 Manne Lab Expansion 5,050,000
10 GG01-00 City Pier Dredging & PIling Replacement 125,000
11 GG03-00 Gateway Parking 2,000,000
12 GG02-01 Laurel St. Pavers [Railroad Ave - 1st St.] 350,000
FIRE PROJECTS
1 FR01-01 Replace SCBA Compressor 32,000
2 FR02-01 Replace Expired SCBA Bottles 30,000
3 FR10-99 Replace Truck 4 600,000
4 FR05-99 East Side Fire Station 1,850,000
5 FR07-99 West Side Fire Station 1,350,000
POLICE PROJECTS
PD01-99 IRadlo Communications
500,0001
PARKS PROJECTS
1 PK01-00 FrancIs Street Improvement 437,000
2 PK25-99 Waterfront Trail-Valley Crk. 150,000
3 PK23-99 Centennial Trail-ITT to Lees Crk. 250,000
4 PK76-99 Waterfront Trail Through Rayonler 979,800
5 PK16-99 Street Trees - City East Entrance 75,000
6 PK98-99 Remodel/Expand Fine Arts Center 650,000
7 PK15-99 Pool Enhancements 2,800,000
8 PK03-99 Construct New Parks Shop/Apparatus Storage 160,000
9 PK26-99 Centennial Trail - Lees Crk to Morse Crk 340,000
10 PK02-99 Lincoln Park Enhancements 300,000
11 PK77 -99 CIVIC Field Enhancements 100,000
12 PK18-99 Covered Tennis Courts 100,000
13 PK62-99 Golf Course/Rec Complex 6,650,000
14 PK06-99 Pier BreakwaterlWaterfront Park 5,000,000
15 PK05-99 IcelYouth PaVIlion 3,000,000
STORMWATER PROJECTS
1 DR54-99 Crown Park Storm Overflow 100,000
2 DR02-99 City-Wide Catch Basin Modifications 405,000
3 DR04-99 Lincoln Street Storm Drain 500,000
4 DR14-99 Peabody Creek/Lincoln St Culvert Rehab 400,000
5 DR53-99 Stormwater Discharges Over Bluff 450,000
6 DR65-99 10th And "N" Street Regional Storm Detention 300,000
7 DR03-99 Milwaukee Dr Stormwater Improvements 1,200,000
8 DR01-01 Albert Street Stormwater Improvements 250,000
TOTAL OF MANDATED GENERAL FUND PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL GENERAL FUND PROJECTS
875,000
42,738,800
.
PROJECT TOTAL
PRIORITY ID PROJECT TITLE PROJECT
COST
.
1 TR61-99 8th Street Reconstruction 2,500,000
2 TR40-99 Laundsen Blvd/Airport Road Realignment 2,123,000
3 TR03-01 Paving/Chip Seal Program 1,500,000
4 TR01-00 Front Street Sidewalk 213,000
5 TR48-99 Olympic Peninsula Inti Gateway 4,717,999
6 TR08-00 5th/Race St. Signal/Overlay 186,000
7 TR11-99 8th Street Bndges Repairs 300,000
8 TR74-99 Sidewalk Program 350,000
9 TR20-99 Street Bicycle Faclllties/Racks/Stnplng 102,000
10 TR02-01 Ennis Street Slide Repair 65,000
11 TR33-99 Peabody Street Reconstruction [Front - 8th] 300,000
12 TR03-00 I' Street Sidewalk 150,000
13 TR04-00 Laundsen Blvd Sidewalk [Jones - Liberty] 100,000
14 TR26-99 ADA Curb Ramps 100,000
15 TR30-99 8th Street Bndge Replacement Study 150,000
16 TR42-99 Laundsen Blvd Bndge Widening 2,820,000
17 TR01-01 8th Street Bndge Replacement 15,500,000
18 TR14-00 Airport Industnal Park Streets 2,000,000
19 TR05-00 Lauridsen Blvd. Sidewalk [VIne - FrancIs] 100,000
20 TR80-99 Laundsen BlvdlWashlngton Street Reconstruct 250,000
21 TR 18-99 Lincoln/Blvd Rechannelizatlon and Signal 453,000
22 TR17-99 Truck Route at US1011ntersectlon 1,150,000
23 TR09-00 16th Street Sidewalk ['I' St - 'F' St] 250,000
24 rR02-00 First Street Sidewalk 200,000
25 TR11-00 10th St Sidewalk ['N' St. - 'M' St ] 375,000
26 TR12-00 10th St. Sidewalk ['M' St - 'I' St] 375,000
27 TR02-99 1 st and Peabody Signal 200,000
28 TR 10-00 16th Street Sidewalk ['F' St - Stevens Sch] 230,000
29 TR21-99 Laundsen Blvd Reconstruction [Trk Rt. - 'L'] 1,800,000
30 TR10-99 10th Street Reconstruction ['N' - Milwaukee] 700,000
31 TR07 -00 Park Ave Sidewalk [Race - Liberty] 400,000
32 TR12-99 Park Avenue Reconstruction [Peabody - Race] 1,000,000
33 TR04-99 Laurel StreetlAhlvers Road Reconstruction 1,200,000
34 TR35-99 Laurel/Laundsen Signal 175,000
35 TR32-99 9th Street Widening 50,000
36 TR 16-99 18th Street Reconstruction ['E' - Landfill] 3,300,000
37 TR13-00 N' Street Sidewalk [14th St - 18th St] 250,000
38 TR14-99 White's Creek Crossing 6,250,000
39 TR70-99 Mt Angeles Road/Porter Street LID 2,000,000
40 TR71-99 10th/13th and "'''I''M'' Street LID 1,200,000
41 TR97 -99 "C" Street and Falrmont LID 2,300,000
42 TR07 -99 Milwaukee Dnve Phase I 2,000,000
43 TR05-99 HIli Street Intersection Reconstruction 300,000
44 TR 13-99 City-Wide Traffic SlgnallnterconnectlPre-emptlon 500,000
45 TR06-99 8th and "C" Street Signal 200,000
46 TR36-99 EnniS Street Guardrail 66,000
47 TR08-99 Milwaukee Dnve Phase II 3,500,000
48 TR69-99 Rhoads Road Area LID 840,000
STREET PROJECTS & T.J.P.
TOTAL OF MANDATED STREET PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL STREET PROJECTS
100,000
64,790,999
.
.
.
.
PROJECT TOTAL
PRIORITY ID PROJECT TITLE PROJECT
COST
CITY of PORT ANGELES LIGHT PROJECTS
1 CL39-99 Upgrade "I" Street Substation 645,000
2 CL03-99 "0" Street Reconductoring 123,000
3 CL02-99 10th Street Reconductonng 56,000
4 CL01-00 I' Street 1201 Rebuild 65,000
5 CL84-99 Laurel Street Rebuild 108,000
6 CL23-99 Landlocked Facilities Conversion 350,000
7 CL03-00 Load Tap changer Oil Processors 45,000
8 CL82-99 Light Warehouse 60,000
9 CL85-99 Fiber OptiCS Backbone 10,672,500
10 CL83-99 Ediz Hook OH - UG Conversion 500,000
11 CL06-99 Install Substation Circuit SWitches 300,000
12 CL07-99 Airport Industnal Park 707,000
13 CL02-00 Laundsen Blvd Rebuild 65,000
14 CL22-99 Electnc SCADA System 61,000
15 CL20-99 Construct Golf Course Rd Sub 556,000
16 CL 18-99 Construct TransmiSSion Line 150,000
17 CL65-99 UGA Electnc Customers 2,000,000
18 CL78-99 Light Operations Center 917,000
TOTAL OF MANDATED LIGHT FUND PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL LIGHT FUND PROJECTS
244,000
17,380,500
SOLID WASTE
1
2
SW31-99
SW35-99
Landfill Transfer Station
Landfill Closure
2,000,000
5,000,000
TOTAL OF MANDATED SOLID WASTE PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL SOLID WASTE PROJECTS
5,000,000
7,000,000
WATER PROJECTS
1 WT12-99 Annual Replacements 975,000
2 WT59-99 Black Diamond Reservoir 900,000
3 WT37-99 Water SCADA 150,000
4 WT31-99 Peabody SI. Reservlor Cover 405,000
5 WT02-99 Concrete Cylinder Pipe Replacement 2,000,000
6 WT03-99 Inter-Tie of High Service Area 770,000
7 WT 46-99 New High Zone Southeast Reservoir 3,250,000
8 WT55-99 Pipeline to New High Zone Reservoir 585,000
9 WT64-99 McDougal Subzone Fire pump 75,000
10 WT56-99 Spruce Street Fire Pump 75,000
11 WT30-99 Downtown Watermalns/Sldewalks III 2,000,000
12 WT65-99 UGA Water Customers 500,000
13 WT01-00 Airport Industnal Park Water Line 1,310,000
14 WT01-99 Golf Course Road Water PRY's 110,000
15 WT57-99 Elwha PS DISinfection 175,000
16 WT32-99 Corrosion Control FaCility 380,000
17 WT02-01 Water Treatment FaCIlity 10,000,000
TOTAL OF MANDATED WATER PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL WATER PROJECTS
1,305,000
23,660,000
.
.
.
PROJECT TOTAL
PRIORITY 10 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT
COST
WASTEWATER PROJECTS
1 WW28-99 Backup Generator 100,000
2 WW27 -99 Annual Replacements Lines 675,000
3 WW25-99 Sewer Pump Stations 1 & 3 Improvements 600,000
4 WW36-99 Compost Facility Upgrade 1,000,000
5 WW26-99 III CSO Reduction 675,000
6 WW01-01 Annexation Interceptor Sewer Main 5,500,000
7 WW05-99 Golf Course Road Sewer Interceptor 1,000,000
8 WW02-00 Airport Industrial Sewer 1,100,000
9 WW03-00 Lindberg Rd. Sewer 1,000,000
10 WW04-99 Laurel Street Outfall ExtenSion CSO ReductIon 180,000
11 WW06-99 Oak Street Outfall ExtenSion CSO Reduction 200,000
12 WW02-01 FranCIS Street ReservOir 10,000,000
TOTAL OF MANDATED WASTEWATER PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL WASTEWATER PROJECTS
11,055,000
22,030,000
Icfp/01-06cfp xis
.
2001 - 2006 CAPITAL .TIES PROJECTS
.
PROJECT TITLE
2 GG02-99 Renovate Carnegie library 1,200,000 400,000 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 Y N
7 GG08-99 City Server & Software Upgrades 500,000 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 N N
6 GG10-99 Valley Creek Restorallon 30,000 10,000 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 Y N
1 GG12-99 laurel St Slide Repair 200,000 200,000 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 N N
8 GG13-99 Downtown Convention Center 4,000,000 40,000 10,000 390,000 3,600,000 0 0 0 40,000 N N
10 GG01-00 CltV Pier Dredging & Piling Replacement 125,000 125,000 15,000 20,000 90,000 0 0 0 125,000 N y
9 GG02-00 Manne lab ExpanSion 5,050,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 4,000,000 0 0 y N
11 GG03-00 Gateway Parking 2,000,000 90,000 0 200,000 300,000 1,500,000 0 0 90,000 Y N
4 GG05-00 Marketing Del GUZZI Dr Property 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N
5 GG06-00 Gateway Sign at Deer Park 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 N N
3 GG01-01 laurel St Stair Repair 225,000 225,000 0 25,000 200,000 0 0 0 225,000 N N
12 GG02-01 laurel St Pavers [Railroad Ave - 1 sl St ] 350,000 350,000 0 0 0 30,000 320,000 0 350,000 N N
GENERAL PROJECTS
4 F R05-99 East Side Fire StatIOn 1,850,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,850,000 1,850,000 Y N
5 FR07 -99 West Side Fire Station 1,350,000 0 0 0 0 1,350,000 0 0 1,350,000 Y N
3 FR10-99 Replace Truck 4 600,000 600,000 0 0 0 0 600,000 0 600,000 N N
1 FR01-01 Replace SCBA Compressor 32,000 32,000 16,000 16,000 0 0 0 0 32,000 N N
2 FR02-01 Replace Expired SCBA Bollles 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 7,000 0 23,000 30,000 N Y
FIRE PROJECTS
POLICE PROJECTS
PD01-99 RadiO Communications
500,000
150,000
o
10 PK02-99 Lincoln Park Enhancements 300,000 75,000 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 75,000 Y N
8 PK03-99 Construct New Parks Shop/Apparatus Storage 160,000 160,000 0 0 0 0 160,000 0 160,000 N N
15 PK05-99 IcelYouth Pavilion 3,000,000 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,500,000 1,500,000 N N
14 PK06-99 Pier BreakwaterlWaterfront Park 5,000,000 2,700,000 0 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 2,700,000 Y N
7 PK15-99 Pool Enhancements 2,800,000 275,000 0 0 2,800,000 0 0 0 275,000 N N
5 PK16-99 Street Trees - City East Entrance 75,000 75,000 0 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 50,000 N N
12 PK18-99 Covered TenniS Courts 100,000 80,000 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 80,000 Y N
3 PK23-99 Centennial Trall-ITT to lees Crk 250,000 0 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 y N
2 PK25-99 Waterfront Trail-Valley Crk 150,000 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 y N
9 PK26-99 Centennial Trail - lees Crk to Morse Crk 340,000 170,000 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 170,000 Y N
13 PK62-99 Golf Course/Rec Complex 6,650,000 6,650,000 0 0 0 3,325,000 3,325,000 0 6,650,000 N N
4 PK76-99 Waterfront Trail Through Rayonler 979,800 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 979,800 75,000 Y N
11 PK77 -99 CIVIC Field Enhancements 100,000 50,000 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 50,000 y N
6 PK98-99 Remodel/Expand Fine Arts Center 650,000 150,000 0 0 250,000 400,000 0 0 150,000 Y N
1 PKO 1-00 FranCIS Street Improvement 437,000 187,000 437,000 0 0 0 0 0 187,000 Y N
PARKS PROJECTS
2 DR02-99 City-Wide Catch BaSin Modifications 405,000 405,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 405,000 N N
7 DR03-99 Milwaukee Dr Stormwater Improvements 1,200,000 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,200,000 1,200,000 N N
3 DR04-99 llncoln Street Storm Drain 500,000 500,000 0 200,000 300,000 0 0 500,000 N Y
4 DR14-99 Peabody Creek/llncotn St Culvert Rehab 400,000 100,000 0 50,000 175,000 175,000 0 0 100,000 Y N
5 DR53-99 Slormwater Discharges Over Bluff 450,000 450,000 0 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 450,000 N N
1 DR54-99 Crown Park Storm Overflow 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 N N
6 DR65-99 10lh And "N" Street Regional Storm Detention 300,000 300,000 0 0 50,000 250,000 0 0 300,000 N N
8 DR01-01 Albert Street Storrnwater Improvements 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 30,000 220,000 250,000 N Y
STORMWATER PROJECTS
TOTAL OF MANDATED GENERAL FUND PROJECTS
TOTAL OF All GENERAL FUND PROJECTS
Page 1
.
2001 - 2006 CAPITA.TIES PROJECTS
tit
PROJECT TITLE
27 TR02-99 1st and Peabody Signal 200,000 20,000 0 0 0 8,000 192,000 0 20,000 Y N
33 TR04-99 Laurel StreetlAhlvers Road Reconstruction 1,200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 1,000,000 200,000 Y N
43 TR05-99 HIli Street IntersectIOn Reconstruclion 300,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 200,000 Y N
45 TR06-99 8th and "C" Street Signal 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 200,000 N N
42 TR07 -99 MIlwaukee Dnve Phase I 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 N N
47 TR08-99 Milwaukee Dnve Phase II 3,500,000 3,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,500,000 3,500,000 N N
30 TR 1 0-99 10th Street Reconstruction ['N' - Milwaukee] 700,000 140,000 0 0 0 70,000 630,000 0 140,000 Y N
7 TR11-99 8th Street Bridges Repairs 300,000 300,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 N N
32 TR12-99 Park Avenue Reconstruction [Peabody - Race] 1,000,000 200,000 0 0 0 100,000 900,000 0 200,000 Y N
44 TR 13-99 City-Wide Traffic SlgnallnterconnectlPre-emptlOn 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 N N
38 TR 14-99 White's Creek Crossing 6,250,000 6,250,000 0 0 0 0 1,250,000 5,000,000 6,250,000 N N
36 TR 16-99 18th Street Reconstruction ['E' - Landfill] 3,300,000 3,300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 3,000,000 3,300,000 N N
22 TR17-99 Truck Route at US1011nterseclion 1,150,000 1,150,000 0 0 0 300,000 850,000 0 1,150,000 Y N
21 TR 18-99 Lincoln/Blvd Rechannelizatlon and SIgnal 453,000 90,600 0 25,000 32,000 396,000 0 0 90,600 Y N
9 TR20-99 Street Blcvcle Facllilies/Racks/Stnplng 102,000 102,000 2,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 102,000 N N
29 TR21-99 Lauridsen Blvd ReconstructIon [Trk Rt - 'L'] 1,800,000 360,000 0 0 0 180,000 1,620,000 0 360,000 Y N
14 TR26-99 ADA Curb Ramps 100,000 100,000 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 N Y
15 TR30-99 8th Street Bridge Replacement Study 150,000 150,000 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 N N
35 TR32-99 9th Street Wldemng 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 50,000 N N
11 TR33-99 Peabody Street Reconstruction [Front - 8th) 300,000 60,000 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 60,000 Y N
34 TR35-99 Laurel/Laundsen SIgnal 175,000 35,000 0 0 0 25,000 150,000 0 35,000 Y N
46 TR36-99 EnnIS Street GuardraIl 66,000 13,000 0 0 0 0 0 66,000 13,000 Y N
2 TR40-99 Lauridsen Btvd/Alrport Road Realignment 2,123,000 0 1,783,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 y N
16 TR42-99 Lauridsen Blvd Bndge Wldemng 2,820,000 564,000 0 444,000 2,000,000 376,000 0 0 564,000 Y N
5 TR48-99 OlympIC Pemnsula Inti Gateway 4,717,999 18,333 89,000 4,560,000 0 0 0 0 18,333 Y N
1 TR61-99 8th Street ReconstructIon 2,500,000 700,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 255,000 Y N
48 TR69-99 Rhoads Road Area LID 840,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 840,000 0 Y N
39 TR70-99 Ml Angeles Road/Porter Street LID 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 1,800,000 0 Y N
40 TR71-99 10th/13th and "1"f'M" Street LID 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 1,080,000 0 Y N
8 TR74-99 SIdewalk Program 350,000 350,000 0 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 350,000 N N
20 TR80-99 LaUridsen BlvdlWashlngton Street Reconstruct 250,000 50,000 0 0 40,000 210,000 0 0 50,000 Y N
41 TR97 -99 "C" Street and Falrmont LID 2,300,000 0 0 0 0 0 230,000 2,070,000 0 y N
4 TRO 1-00 Front Street Sidewalk 213,000 40,000 24,000 189,000 0 0 0 0 40,000 Y N
24 TR02-00 First Street SIdewalk 200,000 50,000 0 0 30,000 170,000 0 0 50,000 Y N
12 TR03-00 I' Street Sidewalk 150,000 40,000 0 25,000 125,000 0 0 0 40,000 Y N
13 TR04-00 Laundsen Blvd SIdewalk [Jones - LIberty] 100,000 20,000 0 15,000 85,000 0 0 0 20,000 Y N
19 TR05-00 LaUridsen Blvd SIdewalk [Vine - FranCIS] 100,000 20,000 0 0 15,000 85,000 0 0 20,000 Y N
31 TR07 -00 Park Ave Sidewalk [Race. liberty] 400,000 200,000 0 0 0 50,000 350,000 0 200,000 Y N
6 TR08-00 5th/Race St Slgnal/Overlav 186,000 18,600 15,000 171,000 0 0 0 0 18,600 Y N
23 TR09-00 16th Street SIdewalk ['I' St - 'F' St ] 250,000 75,000 0 0 40,000 210,000 0 0 75,000 Y N
28 TR 10-00 16th Street SIdewalk ['F' St - Stevens Sch] 230,000 55,000 0 0 0 30,000 200,000 0 55,000 Y N
25 TR11-00 10th St SIdewalk ['N' St - 'M' St ] 375,000 200,000 0 0 40,000 335,000 0 0 200,000 Y N
26 TR12-00 10th St SIdewalk ['M' St - 'I' St] 375,000 200,000 0 0 40,000 335,000 0 0 200,000 Y N
37 TR13-00 N' Street SIdewalk [14th St - 18th St] 250,000 75,000 0 0 0 0 40,000 210,000 75,000 Y N
18 TR14-00 Alrportlndustnal Pari< Streets 2,000,000 0 0 0 565,000 868,000 567,000 0 0 y N
17 TR01-01 8th Street Bndge Replacement 15,500,000 3,100,000 0 0 1,000,000 1,450,000 0 0 3,100,000 Y N
10 TR02-01 Enms Street Slide Repair 65,000 8,300 15,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 8,300
3 TR03-0 1 Paving/ChIp Seal Program 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000 N N
STREET PROJECTS & TIP
TOTAL OF MANDATED STREET PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL STREET PROJECTS
Page 2
.
.
.
.
2001 - 2006 CAPITAL.TIES PROJECTS
.
PROJECT TITLE
3 CL02-99 10th Street Reconductonng 56,000 56,000 48,000 0 0 0 0 0 48,000 N Y
2 CL03-99 "0" Street Reconductonng 123,000 123,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 N Y
11 CL06-99 Install Substation CirCUit SWitches 300,000 300,000 34,000 85,000 89,000 92,000 0 0 300,000 N N
12 CL07 -99 Airport Industnal Park 707,000 0 343,000 178,000 186,000 0 0 0 0 N N
16 CL18-99 Construct Transmission line 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 120,000 N N
15 CL20-99 Construct Golf Course Rd Sub 556,000 556,000 0 0 0 0 74,000 415,000 489,000 N N
14 CL22-99 Electnc SCADA System 61,000 61,000 0 61,000 0 0 0 0 61,000 N N
6 CL23-99 Landlocked FaCIlities Conversion 350,000 350,000 130,000 110,000 110,000 0 0 0 350,000 N N
1 CL39-99 Upgrade "I" Street Substation 645,000 645,000 595,000 0 0 0 0 0 595,000 N N
17 CL65-99 UGA Electnc Customers 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 1,600,000 N N
18 CL78-99 Light Operations Center 917,000 417,000 0 0 0 0 915,000 0 915,000 N N
8 CL82-99 Light Warehouse 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 N N
10 CL83-99 Ed,z Hook OH - UG Conversion 500,000 500,000 130,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 380,000 N N
5 CL84-99 Laurel Street RebUild 108,000 108,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 N N
9 CL85-99 Fiber OptiCS Backbone 10,672,500 10,672,500 1,592,500 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 0 0 10,592,500 N N
4 CLO 1-00 I' Street 1201 RebUild 65,000 65,000 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 65,000 N Y
13 CL02-00 Laundsen Blvd RebUild 65,000 65,000 0 65,000 0 0 0 0 65,000 N N
7 CL03-00 Load Tap changer 011 Processors 45,000 45,000 30,000 15,000 0 0 0 0 45,000 N N
CITY LIGHT PROJECTS
TOTAL OF MANDATED LIGHT FUND PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL LIGHT FUND PROJECTS
11 SW31-99 Landfill Transfer Station 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 0 200,000 500,000 1,300,000 2,000,000 N 1 N I
21 SW35-99 1 Landfill Closure 5,000,000 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 N I Y I
TOTAL OF MANDATED SOLID WASTE PROJECTS 5,000,000 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000
TOTAL OF ALL SOLID WASTE PROJECTS 7,000,000 5,000,000 0 0 0 200,000 500,000 2,300,000 3,000,000
SOLID WASTE
14 WTOI-99 Golf Course Road Water PRY's 110,000 0 0 0 0 110,000 0 0 0 Y N
5 WT02-99 Concrete Cylinder Pipe Replacement 2,000,000 2,000,000 75,000 425,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 2,000,000 N N
6 WT03-99 Inter-Tie of High Service Area 770,000 770,000 115,000 85,000 570,000 0 0 0 770,000 N N
1 WT12-99 Annual Replacements 975,000 975,000 150,000 155,000 160,000 165,000 170,000 175,000 975,000 N N
11 WT30-99 Downtown Watermams/Sldewalks III 2,000,000 500,000 0 100,000 1,900,000 0 0 0 500,000 Y N
4 WT31-99 Peabody St Reservlor Cover 405,000 45,000 45,000 360,000 0 0 0 0 45,000 Y Y
16 WT32-99 Corrosion Control FaCIlity 380,000 380,000 0 0 0 380,000 0 0 380,000 N N
3 WT37 -99 Water SCADA 150,000 150,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 N N
7 WT46-99 New High Zone Southeast ReservOir 3,250,000 2,470,000 25,000 700,000 2,525,000 0 0 0 2,470,000 Y N
8 WT55-99 Pipeline to New High Zone ReservOir 585,000 335,000 0 60,000 525,000 0 0 0 335,000
10 WT56-99 Spruce Street Fire Pump 75,000 75,000 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 N N
15 WT57-99 Elwha PS Dlsmfectlon 175,000 175,000 0 0 0 175,000 0 0 175,000 N N
2 WT59-99 Black Diamond ReservOir 900,000 92,000 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 92,000 Y Y
9 WT64-99 McDougal Subzone Fire pump 75,000 75,000 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 N N
12 WT65-99 UGA Water Customers 500,000 500,000 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 N N
13 WT01-00 Airport Industnal Park Water Lme 1,310,000 0 0 0 130,000 590,000 590,000 0 1,310,000 N N
17 WT02-01 Water Treatment FaCIlity 10,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 N N
WATER PROJECTS
TOTAL OF MANDATED WATER PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL WATER PROJECTS
Page 3
.
2001 - 2006 CAPITAL .TIES PROJECTS
.
PROJECT TITLE
WASTEWATER PROJECTS
10 WW04-99 Laurel Street Outfall Extension CSO Reduction 180,000 180,000 0 0 0 30,000 150,000 0 180,000 N y
7 WW05-99 Golf Course Road Sewer Interceptor 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 140,000 860,000 0 0 0 1,000,000 N N
11 WW06-99 Oak Street Outfall Extension CSO Reduction 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 30,000 170,000 0 200,000 N Y
3 WW25-99 Sewer Pump Stations 1 & 3 Improvements 600,000 600,000 100,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 600,000 N N
5 WW26-99 III CSO Reduction 675,000 675,000 100,000 105,000 110,000 115,000 120,000 125,000 675,000 N y
2 WW27 -99 Annual Replacements Lines 675,000 675,000 100,000 105,000 110,000 115,000 120,000 125,000 675,000 N N
1 WW28-99 Backup Generator 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 N N
4 WW36-99 Compost Facllttv UP9rade 1,000,000 1,000,000 50,000 100,000 840,000 0 0 0 990,000 N N
8 WW02-D0 Airport Industnal Sewer 1,100,000 0 0 0 100,000 500,000 500,000 0 1,100,000 Y N
9 WW03-00 Lindberg Rd Sewer 1,000,000 0 0 0 100,000 900,000 0 0 1,000,000 N N
6 WW01-01 Annexation Interceptor Sewer Main 5,500,000 0 0 250,000 2,100,000 0 350,000 2,800,000 5,500,000 Y N
12 WW02-01 FranCIS Street ReservOir 10,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 N y
TOTAL OF MANDATED WASTEWATER PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL WASTEWATER PROJECTS
n Icfp/01 project order xis
Page 4
.
2001 - 2006 CAPITA.IES PROJECTS
.
PROJECT TITLE
1 GG12-99 Laurel St Slide Repair 200,000 200,000 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 N N
2 GG02-99 Renovate Carnegie library 1,200,000 400,000 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 Y N
3 GG01-01 Laurel St Stair Repair 225,000 225,000 0 25,000 200,000 0 0 0 225,000 N N
4 GG05-00 Marketing Del GUZZI Dr Property 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N
5 GG06-00 Gateway Sign at Deer Park 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 N N
6 GG10-99 Valley Creek Restoration 30,000 10,000 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 Y N
7 GG08-99 City Server & Software Upgrades 500,000 500,000 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 500,000 N N
8 GG13-99 Downtown Convention Center 4,000,000 40,000 10,000 390,000 3,600,000 0 0 0 40,000 N N
9 GG02-00 Manne Lab Expansion 5,050,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 4,000,000 0 0 y N
10 GG01-00 City Pier Dredging & PIling Replacement 125,000 125,000 15,000 20,000 90,000 0 0 0 125,000 N Y
11 GG03-00 Gateway Parking 2,000,000 90,000 0 200,000 300,000 1,500,000 0 0 90,000 Y N
12 GG02-01 Laurel St Pavers [Railroad Ave - 1 st St ] 350,000 350,000 0 0 0 30,000 320,000 0 350,000 N N
GENERAL PROJECTS
1 FR01-01 Replace SCBA Compressor 32,000 32,000 16,000 16,000 0 0 0 0 32,000 N N
2 FR02-01 Replace Expired SCBA Bottles 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 7,000 0 23,000 30,000 N Y
3 FR10-99 Replace Truck 4 600,000 600,000 0 0 0 0 600,000 0 600,000 N N
4 FR05-99 East Side Fife Station 1,850,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,850,000 1,850,000 Y N
5 FR07 -99 West Side Fire Station 1,350,000 0 0 0 0 1,350,000 0 0 1,350,000 Y N
FIRE PROJECTS
POLICE PROJECTS
1\ PD01-99 I RadiO Communications
500,0001
150,0001
01
01
01
01
500,0001
01
500,000 1
y
N
1 PK01-00 FrancIs Street Improvement 437,000 187,000 437,000 0 0 0 0 0 187,000 Y N
2 PK25-99 Waterfront Trail-Valley Crk 150,000 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 y N
3 PK23-99 Centennial Trail-Ill to Lees Crk 250,000 0 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 y N
4 PK76-99 Waterfront Trail Through Rayonler 979,800 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 979,800 75,000 Y N
5 PK16-99 Street Trees - City East Entrance 75,000 75,000 0 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 50,000 N N
6 PK98-99 Remodel/Expand Fine Arts Center 650,000 150,000 0 0 250,000 400,000 0 0 150,000 Y N
7 PK15-99 Pool Enhancements 2,800,000 275,000 0 0 2,800,000 0 0 0 275,000 N N
8 PK03-99 Construct New Parks Shop/Apparatus Storage 160,000 160,000 0 0 0 0 160,000 0 160,000 N N
9 PK26-99 Centennial Trail - Lees Crk to Morse Crk 340,000 170,000 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 170,000 Y N
10 PK02-99 Lincoln Park Enhancements 300,000 75,000 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 75,000 Y N
11 PK77 -99 CIVIC Field Enhancements 100,000 50,000 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 50,000 Y N
12 PK 1 8-99 Covered Tennis Courts 100,000 80,000 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 80,000 Y N
13 PK62-99 Golf Course/Rec Complex 6,650,000 6,650,000 0 0 0 3,325,000 3,325,000 0 6,650,000 N N
14 PK06-99 Pier BreakwaterlWaterfront Park 5,000,000 2,700,000 0 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 2,700,000 Y N
15 PK05-99 IcelYouth PavIlion 3,000,000 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,500,000 1,500,000 N N
PARKS PROJECTS
1 DR54-99 Crown Park Storm Overflow 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 N N
2 DR02-99 City-Wide Catch Basin Modifications 405,000 405,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 405,000 N N
3 DR04-99 lincoln Street Storm Drain 500,000 500,000 0 200,000 300,000 0 0 500,000 N Y
4 DR14-99 Peabody Creek/Lincoln St Culvert Rehab 400,000 100,000 0 50,000 175,000 175,000 0 0 100,000 Y N
5 DR53-99 Storrnwater Discharges Over Bluff 450,000 450,000 0 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 450,000 N N
6 DR65-99 10th And "N" Street Regional Storm Detention 300,000 300,000 0 0 50,000 250,000 0 0 300,000 N N
7 DR03-99 Milwaukee Dr Storrnwater Improvements 1,200,000 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,200,000 1,200,000 N N
8 DR01-01 Albert Street Storrnwater Improvements 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 30,000 220,000 250,000 N Y
STORMWATER PROJECTS
TOTAL OF MANDATED GENERAL FUND PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL GENERAL FUND PROJECTS
Page 1
.
2001 - 2006 CAPITAL.TIES PROJECTS
.
PROJECT TITLE
1 TR61-99 8th Street Reconstruction 2,500,000 700,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 255,000 Y N
2 TR40-99 Lauridsen Blvd/Airport Road Realignment 2,123,000 0 1,783,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 y N
3 TR03-01 Paving/Chip Seal Program 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,500,000 N N
4 TR01-00 Front Street Sidewalk 213,000 40,000 24,000 189,000 0 0 0 0 40,000 Y N
5 TR48-99 Olvmplc Peninsula Inll Gateway 4,717,999 18,333 89,000 4,560,000 0 0 0 0 18,333 Y N
6 TR08-00 5th/Race St Slgnal/Overlav 186,000 18,600 15,000 171,000 0 0 0 0 18,600 Y N
7 TR11-99 8th Street Bridges Repairs 300,000 300,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 N N
8 TR74-99 Sidewalk Program 350,000 350,000 0 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 350,000 N N
9 TR20-99 Street Bicycle Facllilles/Racks/Strlplng 102,000 102,000 2,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 102,000 N N
10 TR02-0 1 Ennis Street Slide Repair 65,000 8,300 15,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 8,300 Y N
11 TR33-99 Peabody Street Reconstrucllon [Front - 8th] 300,000 60,000 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 60,000 Y N
12 TR03-00 I' Street Sidewalk 150,000 40,000 0 25,000 125,000 0 0 0 40,000 Y N
13 TR04-00 LaUridsen Blvd Sidewalk (Jones - Liberty) 100,000 20,000 0 15,000 85,000 0 0 0 20,000 Y N
14 TR26-99 ADA Curb Ramps 100,000 100,000 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 N Y
15 TR30-99 8th Street Bridge Replacement Study 150,000 150,000 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 N N
16 TR42-99 LaUridsen Blvd Bridge Widening 2,820,000 564,000 0 444,000 2,000,000 376,000 0 0 564,000 Y N
17 TR01-01 8th Street Bridge Replacement 15,500,000 3,100,000 0 0 1,000,000 14,500,000 0 0 3,099,000 Y N
18 TR 14-00 Airport Industrial Park Streets 2,000,000 0 0 0 565,000 868,000 567,000 0 0 y N
19 TR05-00 LaUridsen Blvd Sidewalk [Vine - FranCIs] 100,000 20,000 0 0 15,000 85,000 0 0 20,000 Y N
20 TR80-99 LaUridsen BlvdlWashlngton Street Reconstruct 250,000 50,000 0 0 40,000 210,000 0 0 50,000 Y N
21 TR18-99 Lincoln/Blvd Rechannelizatlon and Signal 453,000 90,600 0 25,000 32,000 396,000 0 0 90,600 Y N
22 TR17-99 Truck Route at US101 Intersecllon 1,150,000 1,150,000 0 0 0 300,000 850,000 0 1,150,000 Y N
23 TR09-00 16th Street Sidewalk ['I' St - 'f' siT 250,000 75,000 0 0 40,000 210,000 0 0 75,000 Y N
24 TR02-00 First Street Sidewalk 200,000 50,000 0 0 30,000 170,000 0 0 50,000 Y N
25 TR11-00 10th St Sidewalk ['N' St - 'M' St] 375,000 200,000 0 0 40,000 335,000 0 0 200,000 Y N
26 TR12-00 10th St Sidewalk ['M' St - 'I' St ] 375,000 200,000 0 0 40,000 335,000 0 0 200,000 Y N
27 TR02-99 1 st and Peabody Signal 200,000 20,000 0 0 0 8,000 192,000 0 20,000 Y N
28 TR10-00 16th Street Sidewalk ['F' St - Stevens Sch] 230,000 55,000 0 0 0 30,000 200,000 0 55,000 Y N
29 TR21-99 LaUridsen Blvd Reconstrucllon [Trk Rt - 'L'] 1,800,000 360,000 0 0 0 180,000 1,620,000 0 360,000 Y N
30 TR10-99 10th Street Reconstruction ['N' - Milwaukee] 700,000 140,000 0 0 0 70,000 630,000 0 140,000 Y N
31 TR07 -00 Park Ave Sidewalk [Race - Liberty] 400,000 200,000 0 0 0 50,000 350,000 0 200,000 Y N
32 TR12-99 Park Avenue Reconstruction [Peabody - Race] 1,000,000 200,000 0 0 0 100,000 900,000 0 200,000 Y N
33 TR04-99 Laurel StreeUAhlvers Road Reconstruction 1,200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 1,000,000 200,000 Y N
34 TR35-99 Laurel/Laundsen Signal 175,000 35,000 0 0 0 25,000 150,000 0 35,000 Y N
35 TR32-99 9th Street Widening 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 50,000 N N
36 TR 16-99 18th Street Reconstructlonr;E' - Landfill] 3,300,000 3,300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 3,000,000 3,300,000 N N
37 TR13-00 N' Street Sidewalk [14th St - 18th St] 250,000 75,000 0 0 0 0 40,000 210,000 75,000 Y N
38 TR 14-99 White's Creek Crossing 6,250,000 6,250,000 0 0 0 0 1,250,000 5,000,000 6,250,000 N N
39 TR70-99 Mt Angeles Road/Porter Street LID 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 1,800,000 0 Y N
40 TR71-99 10th/13th and "l"fM" Street LID 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 1,080,000 0 Y N
41 TR97 -99 "CO Street and Falrmont LID 2,300,000 0 0 0 0 0 230,000 2,070,000 0 Y N
42 TR07 -99 Milwaukee Dnve Phase I 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 N N
43 TR05-99 HIli Street tntersecllon Reconstruction 300,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 200,000 Y N
44 TR13-99 City-Wide Traffic SlgnallnterconnecUPre-emptlon 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 N N
45 TR06-99 8th and "CO Street Signal 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 200,000 N N
46 TR36-99 EnniS Street Guardrail 66,000 13,000 0 0 0 0 0 66,000 13,000 Y N
47 TR08-99 Milwaukee Drive Phase II 3,500,000 3,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,500,000 3,500,000 N N
48 TR69-99 Rhoads Road Area LID 840,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 840,000 0 Y N
STREET PROJECTS & TIP
TOTAL OF MANDATED STREET PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL STREET PROJECTS
Page 2
.
2001- 2006 CAPITA.TIES PROJECTS
tit
PROJECT TITLE
1 CL39-99 Upgrade "I" Street Substation 645,000 645,000 595,000 0 0 0 0 0 595,000 N N
2 CL03-99 "0" Street Reconductonng 123,000 123,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 N Y
3 CL02 -99 10th Street Reconductonng 56,000 56,000 48,000 0 0 0 0 0 48,000 N y
4 CLO 1-00 I' Streel1201 RebUild 65,000 65,000 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 65,000 N Y
5 CL84-99 Laurel Street RebUild 108,000 108,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 N N
6 CL23-99 Landlocked FacIlities Conversion 350,000 350,000 130,000 110,000 110,000 0 0 0 350,000 N N
7 CL03-00 Load Tap changer 011 Processors 45,000 45,000 30,000 15,000 0 0 0 0 45,000 N N
8 CL82-99 Light Warehouse 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 N N
9 CL85-99 Fiber OptiCS Backbone 10,672,500 10,672,500 1,592,500 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 0 0 10,592,500 N N
10 CL83-99 Ed,z Hook OH - UG Conversion 500,000 500,000 130,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 380,000 N N
11 CL06-99 Install Substation CirCUit SWitches 300,000 300,000 34,000 85,000 89,000 92,000 0 0 300,000 N N
12 CL07 -99 Airport Industnal Park 707,000 0 343,000 178,000 186,000 0 0 0 0 N N
13 CL02-00 Lauridsen Blvd RebUild 65,000 65,000 0 65,000 0 0 0 0 65,000 N N
14 CL22-99 Electnc SCADA System 61,000 61,000 0 61,000 0 0 0 0 61,000 N N
15 CL20-99 Construct Golf Course Rd Sub 556,000 556,000 0 0 0 0 74,000 415,000 489,000 N N
16 CL18-99 Construct Transrrusslon Line 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 120,000 N N
17 CL65-99 UGA Electric Customers 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 1,600,000 N N
18 CL78-99 Light Operations Center 917,000 417,000 0 0 0 0 915,000 0 915,000 N N
TOTAL OF MANDATED LIGHT FUND PROJECTSI 244,000 244,000 213,OoOf Of aT 01 01 01 213,0001
TOTAL OF ALL LIGHT FUND PROJECTSI 17,380,5001 16,173,500 3,227,5001 3,564,0001 3,835,0001 3,542,0001 1,559,0001 865,0001 15,885,5001
CITY of PORT ANGELES LIGHT PROJECTS
SOLID WASTE
Landfill Transfer Stalion
Landfill Closure
TOTAL OF MANDATED SOLID WASTE PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL SOLID WASTE PROJECTS
1 WT12-99 Annual Replacements 975,000 975,000 150,000 155,000 160,000 165,000 170,000 175,000 975,000 N N
2 WT59-99 Black Diamond ReservOir 900,000 92,000 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 92,000 y y
3 WT37-99 Water SCADA 150,000 150,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 N N
4 WT31-99 Peabody St Reservlor Cover 405,000 45,000 45,000 360,000 0 0 0 0 45,000 y y
5 WT02-99 Concrete Cylinder Pipe Replacement 2,000,000 2,000,000 75,000 425,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 2,000,000 N N
6 WT03-99 Inter-Tie of High Service Area 770,000 770,000 115,000 85,000 570,000 0 0 0 770,000 N N
7 WT46-99 New High Zone Southeast ReservOir 3,250,000 2,470,000 25,000 700,000 2,525,000 0 0 0 2,470,000 y N
8 WT55-99 Pipeline to New High Zone ReservOir 585,000 335,000 0 60,000 525,000 0 0 0 335,000
9 WT64-99 McDougal Subzone Fire pump 75,000 75,000 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 N N
10 WT56-99 Spruce Street Fire Pump 75,000 75,000 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 N N
11 WT30-99 Downtown WatermalnslSldewalks III 2,000,000 500,000 0 100,000 1,900,000 0 0 0 500,000 y N
12 WT65-99 UGA Water Customers 500,000 500,000 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 N N
13 WT01-00 Airport Industnal Park Water Line 1,310,000 0 0 0 130,000 590,000 590,000 0 1,310,000 N N
14 WT01-99 Golf Course Road Water PRV's 110,000 0 0 0 0 110,000 0 0 0 y N
15 WT57-99 Elwha PS DISinfection 175,000 175,000 0 0 0 175,000 0 0 175,000 N N
16 WT32-99 Corrosion Control Facllltv 380,000 380,000 0 0 0 380,000 0 0 380,000 N N
17 WT02-01 Water Treatment FacIlity 10,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 N N
TOTAL OF MANDATED WATER PROJECTS I 1,305,0001 137,0001 845,0001 360,000 I 0 01 01 01 137,0001
TOTAL OF ALL WATER PROJECTSI 23,660,0001 8,542,0001 1,260,OooT 2,135,0001 6,410,0001 2,020,0001 1,360,0001 275,0001 9,752,0001
WATER PROJECTS
Page 3
.
2001 - 2006 CAPITAL.TIES PROJECTS
.
PROJECT TITLE
1 WW28-99 Backup Generator 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 N N
2 WW27-99 Annual Replacements Lines 675,000 675,000 100,000 105,000 110,000 115,000 120,000 125,000 675,000 N N
3 WW25-99 Sewer Pump Stations 1 & 3 Improvements 600,000 600,000 100,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 600,000 N N
4 WW36-99 Compost Facility Upgrade 1,000,000 1,000,000 50,000 100,000 840,000 0 0 0 990,000 N N
5 WW26-99 III CSO Reduction 675,000 675,000 100,000 105,000 110,000 115,000 120,000 125,000 675,000 N Y
6 WW01-01 Annexation Interceptor Sewer Main 5,500,000 0 0 250,000 2,100,000 0 350,000 2,800,000 5,500,000 Y N
7 WW05-99 Golf Course Road Sewer Interceptor 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 140,000 660,000 0 0 0 1,000,000 N N
8 WW02-00 Airport Industrial Sewer 1,100,000 0 0 0 100,000 500,000 500,000 0 1,100,000 Y N
9 WW03-00 Lindberg Rd Sewer 1,000,000 0 0 0 100,000 900,000 0 0 1,000,000 N N
10 WW04-99 Laurel Street Outfall Extension eso Reduction 180,000 160,000 0 0 0 30,000 150,000 0 180,000 N Y
11 WW06-99 Oak Street Outfall Extension eso Reduction 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 30,000 170,000 0 200,000 N Y
12 WW02-01 FrancIs Street Reservoir 10,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 N Y
TOTAL OF MANDATED WASTEWATER PROJECTS1 11,055,0001 1,055,0001 100,00Of 105,00Of 110,0001 175,000 440,000 1,125,000 1,055,0001
1 TOTAL OF ALL WASTEWATER PROJECTS I 22,030,0001 4,430,0001 450,0001 1,200,000 4,220,0001 1,690,000 1,410,000 4,050,000 12,020,0001
WASTEWATER PROJECTS
n Icfp/Ol-06cfp xis
Page 4
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Project #:
CL02-99
. 10th Street Reconductoring
.
.
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project mvolves reconductoring an existmg overhead Planning/Design: $8,000
distribution lIne along 10th street from "Nil street to Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Milwaukee Drive. This project was Identified m our 1995 Construction: $48,000
Long Range Electric System Planning Study. Other: $0
Total: $56,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/T axes: $56,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $56,000
Yearlv Exoense Summary - CapitaVNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$8,000 $48,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,000
Yr Const Comp: r I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
SEPA Required
No
Other PermIts
No
Funding Sources
Rates -ILight Fund - Rates $56,000
Notes: I $56,000
City Priority: Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: Yes Contract: No
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light Cost Center:
Contact: Jim Harper
Div. Priority: 3
Justification:
Loading calculations done as part of our 1995 long range study showed that this section of powerline
was a weak link. System reliability and the potential to serve future growth was impacted.
Impact ifnot executed:
If this project is not completed we will need to reduce our level of service and the degree of reliability
that we currently offer to our customers. We would also need to limit future growth on the west side of
the City.
Remarks
Underground construction is not considered prudent at this time due to inability to establish final
grade fOT above ground facilities.
J
10th Street Reconductoring
Area Map
Project #: CL02-99
..
<<000(;1 OR.
--
u
r-
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
j.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
.
"0" Street Reconductoring
Project #:
CL03-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
This project Involves reconductonng an eXIsting overhead Planning/Design: $13,000
distribution line along "0" street from 14th street to 18th street Land/Right-of.Way: $0
and extending the line wIth new overhead construction from Construction: $100,000
14th street to 10th street. This project was identified in our Other: $10,000
1995 Long Range Electric System Planning Study. Total: $123,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $123,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $123,000
Yearlv Exoense Summarv - CaoitallNet OoeratinS!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$23,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $123,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: SO
Funding Sources
Rates ILight Fund - Rates $123,000
Notes: I 5123,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: Yes
Contract: No
SEPA Required
No
Other PermIts
No
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light
Contact: Jim Harper
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 2
Justification:
Loading calculations done as part of our 1995 long range study showed that this section of powerline
was a weak link. System reliability and the potential to serve future growth was impacted. The
extension from 14th street to lOth street also provides needed switching flexibility.
Impact ifnot executed:
If this project is not completed we will need to reduce our level of service and the degree of reliability
that we currently offer to our customers. We would also need to limit future growth on the west side of
the City.
Remarks
Underground construction is not considered prudent at this time due to inability to establish final
grade for above ground facilities.
.
,j
"0" Street Reconductoring
Project #: CL03-99
Area Map
-
r
'ffll;D IN""
"A~-
-, ..-vtfT
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Install Substation Circuit Switchers
Project #:
CL06-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves installing a clfcuit sWJtcher at Planning/Design: $34.000
Washington Substation, Laurel Substation and "F" Street Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Substation. Construction: $266,000
Other: $0
Total: $300,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $300,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $300,000
Yearlv Expense Summar' - CapitallNet OperatinJ!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $34,000 $85,000 $89,000 $92,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Yr Const Comp: T I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates lLight Fund - Rates $300,000
Notes: I $300,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
SEPA Required
No
Other PermIts
No
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light
Contact: Jim Harper
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 11
Justification:
It has become standard utility practice to install a circuit switcher to protect substation equipment due
to the potential oil cleanup costs and the costs of repairing/replacing the failed equipment. In the event
of a transformer or switchgear failure the CIfCUlt switcher will open much quicker than the existing
high side fuses to minimize damage. The transformers and switchgear in these substations is
approximately 20 years old.
Impact ifnot executed:
Ifthe transformer tank ruptured we would need to clean up approximately 3,600 gallons oftransformer
oil in addition to spending tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars to repair/replace the equipment.
Remarks
Design scheduled in 2001. Construction schedule for one substation per year in 2002, 2003 and 2004.
.
.J
Install Substation Circuit Switchers
Area Map
Project #: CL06-99
..
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
-
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Airport Industrial Park
Project #:
CL07 -99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project mvolves installIng the high voltage underground Planning/Design: $43,000
"backbone" electrical distribution system and street l1ghtmg m Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
the Port's proposed neW industrial park south of the airport. Construction: $664,000
Other: $0
Total: $707,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $707,000
RatesfT axes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $707,000
Yearlv EXDense Summar _ Capita/INet Operating
Prior Years I 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $343,000 $178,000 $186,000 $0 $0 $0 $707,000
Yr Const Comp: T I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: SO
Funding Sources
Donation lFunding by Port or others $707,000
INotes: 1 $707,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light
Contact: Jim Harper
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 12
Justification:
The Port is proposing to develop a new industrial park south of the alTport which will require city
utilities. The cost estimates provided here are very rough since the Port has not provided information
as to the size of electrical loads they want to accommodate. It has also been assumed at this time that
the Port or others would provide all necessary funding.
Impact ifnot executed:
power and street lightmg services would not be available to the industrial park.
Remarks
.
I
\)
Airport Industrial Park
Area Map
Project #:
CL07 -99
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Ire
..
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
.
Construct Transmission Line
Project #:
CL18-99
Project Description . Estimated Project Costs I
ThIs project Involves the constrUctIon of a new 69 KV PlanmnglDesign: $0
transmission line from our existing College Substation to the Land/Right-of-Way: $20,000
proposed Golf Course Road Substation. Construction: $120,000
Other: $10,000
Total: $150,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Ratesllaxes: $150,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $150,000
Yearly EXDense Summar.1J - Capita/INet Operating
Prior Years I 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $150,000
Yr Const Comp: r I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
.
Funding Sources
Rates lLight fund - rates $150,000
Notes: ., $150,000
City Priority:
Lega] Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light
Contact: Jim Harper
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 16
Justification:
Much of our load growth over the last several years has been away from the center of the city to both
the east and the west. At the east side of town there have been a number of annexation proposals as
well as acquisition of customers at the Pay]ess Plaza from the PUD. This load growth has taken up
almost all of our reserve capacity and requires the construction of a new substation on the east side of
town in order to allow for additional growth. A new substation requires a transmission line.
Impact ifnot executed:
If this project is not completed we will need to reduce our level of service and the degree of reliability
that we currently offer to our customers or limit future growth on the east side of the city.
Remarks
This project is mainly contingent on annexatIOn of area east of the current city limits.
.
J
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Construct Transmission Line
Area Map
~
GOLF
Project #: CL18-99
..
.
M41lDOC1( IlD.
I
-
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Construct Golf Course Rd Sub
Project #:
CL20-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs I
This project mvolves the constructlOn of a new dIstribution Planning/Design: $0
substation on property recently purchased by City Light Land/Rlght-of-Way: $67,000
adjacent to the BP A power lines at Golf Course Road. Construction: $489,000
Other: $0
Total: $556,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/T axes: $556,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $556,000
Yearlv Expense Summar\! - Capital/Net Opera tin/!
Prior Years I 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$67,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,000 $415,000 $556,000
Yr Const comp:T First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates ILight Fund - Rates $556,000
Notes: 1 $556,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
SEPA Required
No
Other PermIts
No
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light
Contact: Jim Harper
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 15
Justification:
Much of our load growth over the last several years has been away from the center of the city to both
the east and the west. At the east side of town there have been a number of annexation proposals as
well as acquisition of customers at the Payless Plaza from the PUD. This load growth has taken up
almost all of our reserve capacity and requires the constructIon of a new substation on the east side of
town m order to allow for additional growth.
Impact ifnot executed:
If thIS project is not completed we will need to reduce our level of service and the degree of reliability
that we currently offer to our customers or limit future growth on the east side of the city.
\
. ['maTk'
J
Construct Golf Course Rd Sub
Project #: CL20-99
Area Map
.
.
IolAIlIlOI:l( 110.
~
I
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Electric SCADA System
Project #:
CL22-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs I
This project mvolves converting our eXIsting SCADA system PlanninglDeslgn: $10,000
from cell phone to fiber optic/leased line communications and Land/Right-of-Way: $0
implementing new software. Construction: $51,000
Other: $0
Total: $61,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $61,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $61,000
Yearly Expense Summar~ - CapitallNet Operatinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $6],000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $61,000
Yr Const Comp: T I First Year of Operating Cost: 2000 Operating Cost Amount: $1,500
Funding Sources
Rates lLight Fund - Rates $61,000
Notes: I $61,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
SEPA Required No
Other PermIts
No
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light
Contact: Jim Harper
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 14
Justification:
We need to know what is happenmg in our substations and to eventually be able to switch loads to
minimize line losses.
Impact ifnot executed:
Remain with unreliable comrnumcations system and devote resources to software that is not
compatible with the needs of the other City utilities.
\
. [em arb
J
Electric SCADA System
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: CL22-99
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Landlocked Facilities Conversion
Project #:
CL23-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs I
This project involves rebuilding overhead power lines Planmng/Deslgn $0
constructed along rear lot lines with no alley or equipment Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
access with new underground facihties along the street right of Construction: $240,000
way. In eight areas of the City these inaccessible back lot Other: $110,000
overhead power lines serve approximately 82 customers. The Total: $350,000
Southwood area with 34 customers is being proposed for Estimated Project Funding
rebuild in 2001. The remaining 7 areas wIth their 48 customers Fund Transfer: $0
are proposed for rebuild in 2002 and 2003. Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/Taxes: $350,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $350,000
Yearlv Exoense Summarv - CapitallNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $130,000 $110,000 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
Yr Const Comp:-r First Year of Operating Cost: 2000 Operating Cost Amount: ($30,000)
SEPA Required No
Other Permits
No
.
Funding Sources
Rates ILight Fund - Rates $350,000
Notes: I 5350,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light
Contact: Jim Harper
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 6
Justification:
In the 60's we built some overhead power lines along back lot lines where no alleys or other means of
access were provided. Today many of the poles need replacing and getting access to them is almost
impossible, Over the last several years we have been replacing such facilities with underground along
the front property line were we can access the new facilities from the street.
Impact ifnot executed:
We would need to trespass and or require property owners to remove fences and landscaping in order
to gain access to poles that must be replaced before they fall down.
Remarks
The Southwood rebuild to a great extent utilizes conduit installed for the purpose during a watermam
project in 1995.
.
J
Landlocked Facilities Conversion
Project #: CL23-99
Area Map
.
w
~
t.1
::) ..,:
~ t.1
...J ~
t-= 0 <[
(,1 u c
~
0:::
0:::
4J
:r
u
FOREST AVE.
COl.UMBUS AVE.
.
PARK AVE.
CL23-99
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Upgrade "I" Street Substation
Project #:
CL39-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs I
ThIs project involves changing out the existmg 7.5 MY A Planning/Design: $75,000
substation transfonner for a 12 MY A substation transformer Land/Right-of-Way: $0
and the addition of a circuit switcher. Construction: $570,000
Other: $0
Total: $645,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/Taxes: $645,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $645,000
Yearlv Exoense Summar:' - CapitallNet ODeratinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$50,000 $595,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $645,000
Yr Const Comp: T I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: SO
Funding Sources 1
Rates ILight Fund - Rates $645,000
Notes: I $645,000
City Priority: Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 1
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
.
Contact: Jim Harper
Justification:
Much of our load growth over the last several years has been away from the center of the city to both
the east and the west. At the west side of town there have been a large number of new subdivisions
with new housing as well as much interest in new large commerciallindustrialload additions at the
Port's mdustrial park. This load growth has taken up almost all of our reserve capacity and requires the
upgrading of the "I" Street Substation on the west side of town in order to allow for additional growth.
Impact ifnot executed:
If this project is not completed we will need to reduce our level of service and the degree ofreliability
that we currently offer to our customers or limit future growth on the west side of the city.
Remarks
.
J
Upgrade "I" Street Substation
Area Map
Project #: CL39-99
.
p(!~~
SflWT fS( ~N'o ~ f\lC.'.
'~
1)-,
.
IDCf1lQ;D DlI.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
-
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. UGA Electric Customers
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project mvolves providmg electrical service to customers Planmng/Deslgn: $0
in the entire UGA area to the east of the City. This project is Land/Right-of-Way: $0
dependent on annexation ofthe area mto the City. Construction: $0
Other: $2,000,000
Total: $2,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $2,000,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $2,000,000
Project #: CL65-99
Yearlv EXDense Summar _ CapitaVNet Operatinf!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $1,600,000
Yr Const Comp: T First Year of Operating Cost: 2000 Operating Cost Amount: $100,000
SEPA Required No
Other Permits No
Funding Sources
Rates lLight Fund - Rates $2,000,000
Notes: I $2,000,000
City Priority: Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 17
.
Contact: Jim Harper
Justification:
If the City annexes the UGA area east ofthe City, we will be responsible for providing all the utilities
and other services enjoyed by our citizens.
Impact if not executed:
Not providing lower cost utilitIes will make it more difficult to convince people to annex to the City.
I
. [em ark'
.j
DGA Electric Customers
Area Map
Project #: CL65-99
,.
IoEIa:rr "'.
.
/'
~/'-
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Light Operations Center
Project #:
CL 78-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs I
This project involves the relocation of our crew quarters, PlanninglDesign: $0
warehouse and truck storage facilities to a single locatIOn Land/Right-of-Way: $0
adjacent to our existing pole yard and the City's Corp Yard. Construction: $847,000
The construction would only take place if and when our Front Other: $70,000
& Cherry operations center is sold. Total: $917 ,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $500,000
RateslT axes: $417.000
Unknown: $0
Total: $917,000
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits No
Yearlv Exoense Summar J - CaoitallNet OperatinTi!
Prior Years I 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9] 5,000 $0 $9]7,000
Yr Const Comp:. r I First Year of Operating Cost: 2005 Operating Cost Amount: $1,500
Funding Sources
Donation Light Fund - Sale of old operations building $500,000
Rates Light Fund - Rates $417,000
Notes: 1 $917,000
.
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light
Contact: Glenn A. Cutler
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 18
Justification:
If the Oak street convention center becomes a reality our existing operations center (across the street
from the Port property) would become much more valuable as a site for commercial development. In
addition the added traffic associated with a convention center would make it very difficult to maneuver
our large equipment in and out of our existing facility. The City put our facility on the market in 1993
in an attempt to solicit interest from the private sector in developing connnercial businesses without
success. However, the City has indicated that its long term goal is to have the area develop as a
commercial center. As a result City Light was authorized to seek out and obtain property suitable to
Impact ifnot executed:
Multiple locations for materials and eqUIpment storage degrade efficiency and security. However, this
project is completely contmgent on selling our existing facility.
. ['markS
I
j
Light Operations Center
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: CL 78-99
.
.
.
~
"
It
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
-
Project #:
CL82-99
Light Oil Storage & Process Building
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs I
This project mvolves constructing a 40' X 50' oil storage and Planning/Design: $0
processmg building at Second Street and Valley Street. Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Construction: $60,000
Other: $0
Total: $60,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/T axes: $60,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $60,000
Yearly Expense Summar~ - CapitallNet Operatin1!
Prior Years 1 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 I $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: SO
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Funding Sources
Rates TLight Fund - Rates $60,000
Notes: I $60,000
City Priority: Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: No
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light Cost Center:
Contact: Dave Ireland Div. Priority: 8
Justification:
EP A Regulation 40 CFR Part 761.65 requires any leaking or weeping transformers or drums of liquid
be stored under cover and out of the weather. The City does not have sufficient in-door storage space
to hold the number of transformers and oil filled equipment routinely in storage. The City has
numerouS large oil filled units subject to being retrofilled and reclassified as non PCB. With this
building these units can be retrofilled and reclassified for only the cost of the oil plus labor and oil
disposal. The City can save considerable money by doing this work in house and not by POO. The
potential of fines and citations will be reduced if not eliminated.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continue to pay the overhead cost of the PUD plus the exposure of a PCB spill from PCB
contaminated equipment. In addition, continue to have the exposure of fines and citations for violation
of Federal and State regulations for improper storage and disposal of hazardous materials.
Remarks
A compliance revieW of the Valley facility found over twenty potential violations. While most were
promptly rectified, a few can only be permanently resolved by providing proper storage. Temporary
stora e and restricted PCB handlin rovide for full com liance until this roo ect is com leted.
,/
Light OJ) Storage & Process Building
Area Map
PCB
SIO/'age
for
dISposal
New iransformer slOfIge
1HV
8reakers &
conlrols
BlOCk
bulldl"l,l
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Vahey transformer
and switch yard
Mise, slorage
00
DO
DO
Project #: CL82-99
-.
Existing stora.ge
building. Mobile
sub, too1s and
equipment
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Ediz Hook OB - UG Conversion
Project #:
CL83-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
ThIS project mvolves convertmg a portIOn of the overhead Planning/Design: $20,000
electric distribution lIne on Ediz Hook to underground. Land/Righl-of-Way: $0
Conslruc\JOn: $480,000
Other: $0
Total: $500,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $500,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $500,000
Yearlv Expense Summar" - CapitallNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$20,000 $130,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $400,000
Yr Const Comp: T First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: SO
Funding Sources 1
Rates lLight Fund - Rates $500,000
Notes: -I $500,000
1
//
/1 LJ ,- A
r ~ 7 ,
I -
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts
No
"
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
f~ ;
, .
c..
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light
Contact: Jim Harper
{ },
~.J _
C /
D
Justification:
Underground facilities are not as visually obtrusive as overhead lines in this scenlC area 01 tne CIty.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continue to have poles visible to the visiting public.
Remarks
e
, f
Ediz Hook OH - UG Conversion
Area Map
Project #: CL83-99
.
~~ll\l.
~,
1'1,
.
~"
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Laurel Street Rebuild
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
This project involves rebuilding approxImately 2400 ft of#2 Planning/Design: $8,000
Cu overhead to 336 AA along Laurel Street from Park Avenue Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
to Ahlvers Road. Construction: $100,000
Other. $0
, Total: $108,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $108,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $108,000
Project #: CL84-99
Yearlv Expense Summar, _ CapitallNet OperatinJl
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$8,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $108,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: SO
SEPA ReqUIred No
Other PermIts No
Funding Sources
Rates ILight Fund - Rates $108,000
Notes: -I $108,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light
Contact: Jim Harper
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 5
Justification:
Approximately 4 MY A of load south of Park Avenue is without feeder tie capability. This line will
provide an alternative feed in case ofloss of the line on Peabody, and will allow a balancing of the
load between Laurel 1202 and Laurel 1203 feeders.
Impact ifnot executed:
Long outages to a great number of customers in the event of a line failure.
\
. [em.r~
J
Laurel Street Rebuild
Project #: CL84-99
Area Map
..
F' ARK A \.'E.
Ol YM1
AHL\lERS RD.
.
V1EWCRES1 A ~
>-
o
o
to
-<
w
CL
1
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Fiber Optics Backbone
Project #:
CL85-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project mvolves constructing a fiber optic backbone Planning/Design: $1,672 ,500
system for use by business, government, and education Land/Right-of-Way: $0
throughout the city. The network will connect to other Construction: $9,000,000
networks both inside and outside the CIty to provide a full Other: $0
range of connectivity, Total: $10,672,500
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $10,672,500
Unknown: $0
Total: $10,672,500
Yearlv Exoense Summarl! - CaoitaVNet OoeratinJ!
Prior Years 2001 I 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$80,000 $1,592,500 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $10,672,500
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: 2001 Operating Cost Amount: $100,000
Funding Sources
Rates TLight Fund $10,672,500
Notes: I $10,672,500
\
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: City
Contact: Scott McLain
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 9
Justification:
Telecommunications and fiber optics are increasingly important factors in retaining and attracting
businesses. Municipal government and its utilities are also finding more and more internal uses for
high speed communications between facilIties. Thus more and more municipalities and publicly
owned electric utilities are getting into the telecommunications business. With US West installing
fiber to the Peninsula by the end of 2000, having a hybrid fiber network in the City would enable local
businesses to have direct access to interstate communication hubs in Seattle. Now is the time for the
City to seek strategic partners and move our community into the information age as first class citizens.
Impact ifnot executed:
High speed, high capacity communications will not be available to the City and the business
community for several more years.
Remarks
Expenses in years 2002-2004 are estimated costs if the fiber optic system is distributed to all
customers in the CIty, A business plan would be developed before any of these phases are approved or
constructed. Under oundin of these lines will be considered durin the desi rocess.
.
v
Fiber Optics Backbone
Area Map
Project #: CL85-99
.
.. ~ "",.. ....
~,
"
..
_.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. "I" Street 1201 Rebuild
Project #: CLOI-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project Involves rebuilding approximately 2000 feet to 3- Planning/DesIgn: $7,500
336 AA along 7/8 alley from Feeder 1201 exit east ofI Street Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
west to K Street, north to 6/7 alley and west to M Street. Construction: $57,500
Other: $0
Total: $65,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $65,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $65,000
SEPA Required No
Other Permits No
Yearlv Exoense Summar I! - CaoitaVNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates lLight Fund $65,000
Notes: T $65,000
I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: Yes
Contract: No
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light
Contact: Jim Harper
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 4
o
Justification:
This rebuild is necessary to pick up "F" Street 1202 in case of loss of "F" Street Substation. "I" Street
1202 has insufficient capacity to pick up both 1202 and 1203 out ofF Street Substation ifthe
transfonner is lost.
Impact ifnot executed:
Under peak load conditions, loss of F Street Substation transformer would result in conductors loaded
in excess of their capacity.
. [emarb
\
)
"I" Street 1201 Rebuild
Project #: CL01-00
Area Map
.
f:tJ~., Ah
~~tS' It
~6Q,.
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
" Lauridsen Blvd Rebuild
Project #:
CL02-00
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs I
ThIS project involves extendmg new 3-336 AA underbuild on Planning/Design: $7,500
the Daishowa 69kV Ime 3700 feet along Lauridsen Blvd from Land/Righl-of-Way: $0
F Street to Airport Rd. Construction: $57,500
Other: $0
Total: $65,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $65,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $65,000
Yearlv Expense Summarv - CapitallNet OperatinJ!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000
Yr Const Comp: T 0 1 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: SO
Funding Sources
Rates ILight Fund $65,000
Notes: I $65,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
SEPA ReqUired No
Other Permits No
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light
Contact: Jim Harper
Justification:
Provide improved service to the Airport and the area south of the Airport.
Cost Center: 0
Div. Priority: 13
Jmpact~notexecuted:
Failure of the underground cable serving this area will result in 4-8 hour outage to the area.
Remarks
Underground construction is not considered prudent at this time due lack of curbs and gutter in this
area to establish final grade at locations of above ground equipment.
e
J
Lauridsen Blvd Rebuild
Project #: CL02-00
Area Map
..
fi
....
li
E1.
It::
~
i
i
&.l
11:I
ttW'1 ,01
,.::
(IJ
-
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
-
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Load Tap Changer Oil Processors
Project #:
CL03-00
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
This project mvolves purchase and installatlOn of six (6) Planning/Design: $0
continual oil filter and processing units to be installed in six Land/Right-of-Way: $0
City Light Substations. (Valley, "A" Street, Laurel and Construction: $45,000
Washington in 2001 and "F" Street and College in 2002) Other. $0
Total: $45,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RatesfT axes: $45,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $45,000
Yearlv Exoense Summar~ - CapitallNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $30,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
Yr Const Comp: T 0 I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $150
SEPA Required
No
Other PermIts
No
Funding Sources
Rates -}Light Fund $45,000
Notes: I $45,000
City Priority: Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No ,Contract: No
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Light Cost Center: 0
Contact: Dave Ireland
Div. Priority: 7
Justification:
Manufacturer recommendations call for substation transformer LTC contacts to be checked and oil to
be checked and replaced or filtered every 100,000 operations or five years, whichever comes first..
All City substations fall under the five year limit. With the attachment of a continual oil filter the oil
will be kept moisture free and in a clean state thus reducing the wear on the LTC contacts and
extending the maintenance interval to seven years and extend the life of the oil to several maintenance
intervals..
Impact ifnot executed:
A regular five year maintenance routine will have to be followed.
Remarks
The operating cost ofthe units is based on replacement of the internal filters every six
months.
"I" Street Substation will have the filter installed as nart ofthe rebuild CL 39-99 in 2001.
j
Load Tap Changer Oil Processors
Project #: CL03-00
Area Map
--
~,
,
LEGEND
. SUBSTATION
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
.
City-Wide Catch Basin Modifications
Project #: DR02-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project mvolves replacing eXIsting catch basms and inlets with Planning/Design' $0
more effiCIent and safe inlets in problem areas. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction: $405,000
Other: $0
Total: $405,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/Taxes: $405,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $405,000
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
Yearlv Expense Summa1:' - CapitallNet Operatin!!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $55,000 $60,000 $65,000 $70,000 $75,000 $80,000 $405,000
Yr Const Comp: 1 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates T Storm Water Rates (W astewate) $405,000
Notes: I $405,000
.
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Storm
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 2
Justification:
The eXIsting catch basins in many locations are at the center ofthe curve in a comer. In many of these
locatIons, the catch basins are depressed, which cause some vehicle ride problems when turning the
comer. The location at the center of the curve is not an efficient location or method of capturing
stormwater. In some cases the stormwater runs across the intersections which is not recommended.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued use of old system WIth efficiency and safety problems.
.
Remarks
l
j
City-Wide Catch Basin Modifications
Project #: DR02-99
Area Map
.
~"""--'.'"-.--
r#JI~ .......-
--,
"
.
I
f
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
.-------
Project #:
DR03-99
.
Milwaukee Dr. Stormwater Improvements
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project involves providmg stonnwater improvements m the Planning/Design: $120,000
Milwaukee Dnve area. The project involves installIng a stonn Land/Rlght-of-Way. $0
water system which will mclude stonn water lines, manholes Construction: $1,080,000
and catch basms. Other: $0
Total: $1,200,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/T axes: $600,000
Unknown: $600,000
Total: $1,200,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar _ CapitallNet OveratinJ!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $1,200,000
Yr Const Comp: 1 l First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates Stonn Water Fees or LID $600,000
Unknown Unknown $600,000
Notes: I $1,200,000
.
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Stonn
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 7
Justification:
The west end of the city is developmg in a spotty pattern which results in a case by case design of the
stonnwater systems for the area. It is important to design and construct a well coordinated stonnwater
system that will address the full future development needs of the area.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued flooding during heavy rains.
.
Remarks
r
\
j
Milwaukee Dr. Stormwater Improvements
Area Map
Project #: DR03-99
--
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Lincoln Street Storm Drain
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project involves deslgmng and installing a stonn dram m PlanmnglDeslgn: $50,000
Lincoln Street from 4th Street to 7th Street that will allow the Land/Rlght-of-Way' $0
separation of stormwater from the samtary sewer. Construction' $450,000
Other: $0
Total: $500,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $100,000
Unknown: $400,000
Total: $500,000
Project #: DR04-99
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Yearlv Expense Summan _ CaDitallNet Operatiml
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $200,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
.
Funding Sources I
Rates I Storm Water Fees $100,000
Unknown Unknown $400,000
Notes: l $500,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Storm
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 3
Justification:
Lincoln Street does not have a separated storm drain and sanitary sewer system between 4th and 8th
Streets and the system above 8th Street is undersized for the flows. Construction of this project will
assist development and aid in the reductIon of combined sewer overflows at 2nd and Lincoln. New
development will be required to extend the existing storm system from 4th to 7th Streets.
Impact ifnot executed:
Contmued combmed sewer overflows and development restrictions. This project is also a requirement
of our NPDES permit.
.
Remarks
[
~I
Lincoln Street Storm Drain
Area Map
Project #: DR04-99
..
FOURTH ST.
SIXTH ST.
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
CIty Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
----
Project #:
DR14-99
.
Peabody Creek/Lincoln St Culvert Rehab
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs Stormwater joint project with WSDOT mvolves repainng Planning/Design: $50,000
and rehabihtating the existing culvert under Lmcoln Street Land/Right-of-Way. $0
from Fust Street to the mouth of Peabody Creek. Construction' $350,000
Other: $0
, Total'
$400,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donallons/Grants/Loans: $300,000
Rates/Taxes: $0
Unknown: $100,000
Total. $400,000
Yearlv Expense Summarv - CaDitallNet ODeratinJ(
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 I $50,000 $175,000 $175,000 $0 $0 $400,000
Yr Const Comp: I 1 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant WSDOT $300,000
Unknown City $100,000
Notes: I $400,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Storm
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 4
Justification:
ThIs project would repair the failing condition of the large culvert under Lincoln Street which carries
Peabody Creek. The bottom of the pipe in many portions of its length have failed. The bricks that lined
the bottom of the pipe have been removed by the flow of the stream. Cracks are beginning to show up
on the walls of the pipe indicating that the pIpe is losing its strength. WSDOT is responsible for the
section, in the right-of-way, between Front and First Streets, including the intersections.
Impact ifnot executed:
In the long term failure to fund this project could result in the failure of the culvert and the loss of
Lincoln Street as a traveled roadway wIth a high potentIal for property damage.
. rem.rb
/
'-..."
Project #: DR14-99
Peabody Creek/Lincoln St Culvert Rehab
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Stormwater Discharges Over Bluff
Project #: DR53-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project involves Improvmg the storm dIscharge over the bluff Planning/Design: $50,000
to the Straits. Work mcludes addItional discharge at lOth, "P", Land/Right-of-Way: $0
"Nil, and McDonald Streets. Construction: $400,000
Other: $0
Total: $450,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $450,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $450,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Yearlv Expense Summarv - CaDitallNet Operatinl!
Prior Years T 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 1 $0 $50,000 $]00,000 $]00,000 $]00,000 $100,000 $450,000
Yr Const Comp: I 1 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
.
Funding Sources
Rates IStonn Water Fees $450,000
Notes: I $450,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Stonn
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 5
Justification:
The current discharge of stonnwater over the bluff at these location needs to be improved. To
elimmate erosion ofthe bluff caused by the discharge of the water. The erosion of the bluff has
caused property damage in the area.
Impact ifnot executed:
Contmued erosion of the bluff and sediment transport to the StraIt.
Remarks
r
.
I
V
Stormwater Discharges Over Bluff
Area Map
Project #: DR53-99
.
SiR"l) Or JUAN m: ruCA
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
CIty Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Crown Park Storm Overflow
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project mvolves mstallatlOn of catch basins and plpmg m the Planning/Design' $15,000
Crown Park area to capture and convey storm water safely Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
away from the bluff area, Construction' $85,000
Other: $0
Total: $100,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $100,000
Unknown' $0
Total: $100,000
Project #: DR54-99
Yearlv Expense Summar:' - CapitallNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $]00,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $]00,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Funding Sources
Rates IWaste Waterrates $100,000
Notes: I $100,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Storm
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 1
Justification:
Eliminate erosion of bluff face due to uncontrolled discharge during storm events. Will help to reduce
amount of storm water overflow problems to the west. Erosion debris deposits create a hazard to the
industrial waterline.
Impact if not executed:
Contmued erosion, potential hazard to the industrial watermain, and damage to property in the area.
\
. (.r~
v
Crown Park Storm Overflow
Project #: DR54-99
Area Map
.
~
(f)
...
2
w
FIFTH
ST.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
-----.-----.
Project #: DR65-99
. 10tb And "N" Street Regional Storm Detention
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project involves constructing a regional stormwater detentIon Planning/DesIgn: $50,000
system for the west end. This would include constructmg a Land/Right-of-Way: $0
storage facility and storm lines from the general area. Construcllon: $250,000
Other: $0
Total: $300,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $300,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $300,000
Yearlv Exoense Summar~ - Caoital/Net OoeratinJ!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates I Storm Water Fees $300,000
I $300,000
Notes: I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Storm
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 6
Justification:
The development in the west end of the city has occurred slowly over tIme. This development has been
spotty making the deSIgn and construction of a regional stormwater system very difficult to coordinate.
In order for the west end to develop fully in line with the Compo Plan, a regional stormwater system
should be constructed to address stormwater runoff in accordance with the state standards.
Impact ifnot executed:
Reduced development and potential short term flooding of property.
Remarks
.
/
Project #: DR65-99
10th And "N" Street Regional Storm Detention
Area Map
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. First St. Stormwater Separation
Project #: DROI-Ol
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs I
ThIS project mvolves the desigmng and construction of storm Planning/Design: $30,000
drain lines m Vme, Albert and Eumce Streets between First Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
and Front Streets. The project wlll allow the separation of Construction. $220,000
stormwater from the sanitary sewer Other: $0
Total. $250,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $250,000
Unknown: $0
Total. $250,000
Yearlv Expense Summarv - CapitaI/Net Operatinrz
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $220,000 $250,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates IWaste Waterrates $250,000
Notes: T $250,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Storm
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 8
Justification:
A requirement ofthe National pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Waste Discharge
Permit to reduce flows Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) to the Waste Water Treatment Plant.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued combined sewer and violation of the NPDES permit.
. [em arks
\
I
,
First St. Stormwater Separation
Area Map
Project #: DROI-Ol
.
--
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
,
,
~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
East Side Fire Station
Project #:
FR05-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Flre project mvolves the construction of a satelhte fire Planning/Design $0
statlOn on the east slde of the Clty. Land/Rlght-of-Way. $50,000
Construction $1,800,000
Other' $0
Total $1,850,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer' $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $1,850,000
RateslT axes' $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $1,850,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearly Expense Summan - CapitallNet Ooeratinll
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,850,000 $0 $0 $1,850,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: 2005 Operating Cost Amount: $830,500
Funding Sources
DonatlOn Iv oted Bond $1,850,000
Notes: I $1,850,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Department: Flre
Contact: Dan McKeen
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 4
Justification:
If annexation of Port Angeles' east slde urban growth area (UGA) occurs, an east slde fire station will
be necessary to provide an equivalent level of fire and EMS services to the annexed area. With an east
slde expansion, a fire statlon located in thlS area would assist m maintammg the Clty's current ISO
(fire msurance) rating.
Impact if not executed:
As annexation occurs, response times wlll also increase far beyond the City's four-mmute goal--
escalating the threat to pubhc safety and property. ExpanslOn to the east wlthout provldmg an
addltional fire statlOn would hkely cause the City's ISO rating and insurance premlUms to mcrease.
Remarks
As an alternative approach deslgned to reduce expendltures, the City could explore "co-locatlOn"
statlOn designs. Capltal, operating and maintenance costs could then be shared between the City and
Coun . The fire station cost was calculated based u on a three-ba remote fire station desl
J
East Side Fire Station
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Director
Fmance Director:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
GA'
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Project #: FR05-99
'-
,
S)I}O/
,
I
.
tP
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
West Side Fire Station
Project #:
FR07 -99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
The constructIon of a satellIte fire statIOn on the west sIde of Planning/Design. $100,000
the city. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $50,000
Construction: $1,200,000
Other: $0
Total: $1,350,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes. $0
Unknown. $0
Total: $0
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summan - CaoitallNet Ooeratinf!
Prior Years 200t 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $1,350,000
Yr Const Comp: r 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Bond Iv oted Bond $1,350,000
Notes: I $1,350,000
City Priority:
Department: Fire
Contact: Dan McKeen
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority:
Justification:
If growth continues south and west of the aIrport, a west side fire station will be necessary to provide
appropnate response hmes to these areas. WIth residentIal and conunercial "build-up", a west side fire
station would assist m mamtaimng the City's current ISO (fire insurance) rating. A west SIde fire
station could significantly decrease response time to areas west of the 8th Street bridges should
damage occur to one or both of the bndges from a natural or man-made dIsaster.
Impact ifnot executed:
As wes side growth continues (I.e.), industrIal), response times will mcrease far beyond the City's four-
rmnute goal-- escalatmg the threat to public safety and property. As residential and conunercial build-
up occurs to the west, the City's ISO ratmg and msurance premiums would likely increase.
Remarks
As an alternatIve approach desIgned to reduce expendItures, the City could explore a "partnership"
wIth the Port of Port Angeles. A fire station could be built in the area of the aIrport with capital,
oneratme: and maintenance costs shared between the City and the Port.
West Side Fire Station
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Director
Finance Director:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
0.,-
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Project #: FR07-99
,
,
-.
,
,
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Replace Truck 4
Project #:
FRIO-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
Replace the department's 1967 aenalladder truck. PlanmnglDeslgn. $0
Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Construction $0
Other. $600,000
Total: $600,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $600,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $600,000
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
Yearlv Expense Summar~ - Capital/Net OperatinJ!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $0 $600,000
Yr Const Comp: I I First Year of Operating Cost: 2005 Operating Cost Amount: $10,000
Funding Sources
Taxes IGeneral Fund $600,000
Notes: I $600,000
City Priority:
Department: Fire
Contact: Dan McKeen
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division: Suppression
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 3
Justification:
While the department's aerial ladder truck has been refurbished, It still has numerous components over
33 years old. Because of its age, the CIty should seriously consIder replacmg it with a newer ladder
truck. A newer ladder truck will not only ensure a greater degree of relIabIlIty, but will also be
provIded with more current desIgn features for added firefighter safety.
Impact if not executed:
As the age and use ofthe truck mcreases, so could the possIbilIty of faIlure. Because of the ladder
truck's age, the FIre Department may not receIve full credit from the Washington Survey and Rating
Bureau.
Remarks
The CIty could explore a "Joint use" or functIOnal consolIdation agreement wIth the County. ThIS
agreement would elimmate a possible duplIcatIon of ladder trucks in the area, providmg the taxpayers
of both urisdictions the abilIt to 0 erate a uali ladder truck within limited financial resources.
j
Replace Truck 4
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Director
Finance Director:
City Engtneer:
City Manager:
Date: ~O I
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
0-1'
Project #: FRIO-99
,.
'-
,
I
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Replace SCBA Compressor
Project #:
FROI-Ol
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Replace the department's Self Contamed Breathmg Apparatus Planning/Design' $0
(SCBA) compressor which was purchased 15 years ago. Land/Rlght-of-Way $0
Construction' $32,000
Other. $0
Total: $32,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer' $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes' $32,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $32,000
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
Yearlv Expense Summar - CapitallNet OperatinJ!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $16,000 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Taxes ITaxes and general fund $32,000
Notes: T $32,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: Yes
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Department: FIre
Contact: Dan McKeen
Division: Suppression
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 1
Justification:
The department will be able to fill its air bottles to maXImum capacIty, allowing firefighters to operate
WIthin a hazardous environment longer. A new SCBA compressor will provide a quicker turn around
in fillIng bottles, freemg up personnel to perform other tasks at a major mcident. New technology will
be available, providmg a more advanced punficatIOn system. This will ensure that the department wIll
meet air purification standards, reducmg mOIsture in the compressed air to allow for longer life
expectancy of the departments self-contamed breathing equipment. A new SCBA compressor will be
prOVIded with full containment, making fillIng operatIOns safer.
Impact ifnot executed:
The department wIll be unable to fill ItS specIal operations bottle to capacIty, reducing a firefighters
time he/she can work within a hazardous environment. AdditIOnal moisture will also continue to enter
the departments self-contained breathing equipment, causmg premature failure of thIS equipment.
Remarks
One-half of the funding was approved in the FY 2001 budget.
J
Replace SCBA Compressor
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Director
Finance DIrector:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
0,
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Project #: FROI-Ol
,
,
sl 110 J
I
,
.
.
.
, ,~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Replace Expired SeBA Bottles
Project #:
FR02-01
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Replace the department's self-contamed breathmg apparatus PlanninglDesign' $0
bottles WhICh have expired. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction: $30,000
Other: $0
Total: $30,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $30,000
Unknown, $0
Total: $30,000
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
Yearlv Expense Summar - Capital/Net Operatinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000 $0 $23,000 $30,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Taxes -ITaxes and general fund $30,000
Notes: I $30,000
City Priority:
Department: Fire
Contact: Dan McKeen
Legal Mandate: Yes
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division: Suppression
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 2
Justification:
The regular replacement of self-contamed breathing apparatus bottles IS mandated on a IS-year cycle.
The majority of the bottles are commg due for replacement in the next few years. Self-contained
breathing apparatus bottles are an absolutely essential pIece of safety eqUIpment for firefighters.
Dunng use, self-contained breathing apparatus bottles are subjected to extremes of temperature and
pressure. The reliability of those bottles is essential.
Impact if not executed:
FaIlure of a self-contained breathmg apparatus bottle could result in the serious injury or death of a
firefighter.
Remarks
I
J
Replace Expired SCBA Bottles
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Director
Fmance. DIrector:
City Engineer:
CIty Manager:
Q.-
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Project #: FR02-01
,
,
sIIJoJ
,
~
,
,
~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Renovate Carnegie Library
Project #: GG02-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS project involves renovating/restoring the old Carnegie PlannlnglDesign: $127,000
Library. The project will include structural upgrades, fire Land/Right-of-Way: $0
protection, and meet the requirements of the American Construcbon: $1,173,000
DisabIlities Act (ADA). Other: $0
Total' $1,300,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $500,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $650,000
RateslTaxes: $0
Unknown: $150,000
Total: $1,300,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv EXDense Summarv - Caoita/INet OoeratinJl
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$200,000 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation Walkling Trust $200,000
DonatIOn NOLS/ City Agreement $400,000
Fund Transfer CIty Funds Budgeted for 2001 $50,000
Fund Transfer City Funds Budgeted m 2000 $450,000
Grant HIstorical Museum Grant $50,000
Unknown Unfunded Portion $150,0ge
Notes: I $1,300,000
I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division:
Contact: Glenn A. CutlerIRon
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 2
Justification:
The old Carnegie LIbrary facade is in a condition that it can be restored. There is a potentIal that the
museum could be housed in the restored facility. This project due to its proximity to downtown and
ItS historical nature could help provide other actIvitIes for tourists to do when in the area.
Impact if not executed:
The buildmg could remain vacant and be a dram on city resources as other vacant buildings have
become.
Remarks
11 "h,.,1 J;'v-n......C'..C'. 100Sl _ ct" "1111. 1000 _ ct17'l 111111. ")111111 - ctl SI AIIII
J
Renovate Carnegie Library Project #: GG02-99 ,
Area Map
~~ l~
~
5j
.
l- .
(.f) l-
e U) #' ~
Z .
.-J
0
()
L Z
-
-.J ,
:J #'
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Fmance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
..
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. City Server & Software Upgrades
Project #: GG08-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project mvolves upgradmg and replacmg the city's finance Planning/DesIgn: $0
software applicatIon and hardware. Land/Rlghl-of-Way: $0
Construction" $0
Other. $500,000
Total: $500,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $400,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RatesfT axes: $100,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $500,000
Year'v Expense Summa,." _ CapitallNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Yr Const Comp: T First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer Information Services Reserves $100,000
Fund Transfer Utility Rates $300,000
Taxes General Funds $100,000
Notes: I $500,000
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits No
.
City Priority:
Department: Finance
Contact: Yvonne Ziomkowski
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division: Finance
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 7
Justification:
Much ofthe finance software and hardware will be more than a decade out of date as well much of the
core application software. With the rate at which technology changes we need to modernize of
hardware and software to be able to maintain quality customer service. The existing software is based
on Disk Operating System (DOS), is very user unfriendly, not flexible and does not meet standards.
Impact ifnot executed:
Application software will no longer be supported by the vendor and we will be on our own to fix any
problems.
. [em arks
\
City Server & Software Upgrades
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Director
r/{UJt.<-<-L %(p~~
{
Date:
Project #: GG08-99
.
.
S;2~/(9/
r/<3//0/
Finance Director: >J{)-o~ ,%(-~ ~
City Engineer:
City Manager:
Date:
Date:
.
~ Remarks
I
,
,
CAPITAL FACILItIES PROJECT
Valley Creek Restoration
Project #: GGIO-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project involves restonng habitat along Valley Creek from the PlanmnglDeslgn' $0
estuary to State Route 101, The Rotary Club and the Lower Land/Rlght-of-Way $0
Elwha Klallam Tribe will be partners III this proJect. Construction: $30,000
Other: $0
Total: $30,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $20,qOO
RateslTaxes: $10,000
Unknown- $0
Total $30,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits No
Yearlv Expense Summar - CapitallNet Operatinf!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation Rotary Club $10,000
Donation Elwha Tribe $10,000
Taxes Property Taxes $10,000
Notes: I $30,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Admin
Contact: Glenn A. Cutler
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 6
Justification:
With ESA lIstings of salmon in the region the City is looking to do its share in restoratIOn and
enhancement of stocks.
Impact if not executed:
Restoratton of Valley Creek will be delayed.
Valley Creek Restoration
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: GGIO-99
,.
,.
,
,
,
~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Laurel S1. Slide Repair
Project #: GG12-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This CIty project mvolves repainng shde damage caused by PlannlnglDeslgn' $40,000
heavy rams In 1999. Work would mclude replacement of stairs. Land/Rlght-of-Way' $0
Construction $160,000
Other. $0
Total. $200,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $200,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $200,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summar - CaoitallNet Ooeratin!!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$40,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer 2000 Budgeted $40,000
Fund Transfer 2001 Budgeted $160,000
Notes: l $200,000
I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utihties Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 1
Justification:
The hIllSIde has eroded and needs to be stabilized to prevent further erosion and damage to City
owned and pnvate property.
Impact ifnot executed:
Further erOSIOn. Htllslde faIlure and possible damage to the adjacent structures.
Remarks
tetual Expenses:
2000 - $25,000
I St Slide Repair
Laure .
Project #: GG12-99
Area Map
~~
I
,
L
. ,p
REVIEW:
Department Head ____
Planning DIrector _
Date:
Date:
Finance Director:
Date:
City Engmeer:
Date:
CIty Manager:
Date:
,
,.
,.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Downtown Convention Center
Project #: GG13-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project mvolves a proposal to locate a conventIOn center In the Planning/Design: $400,000
downtown area. The convention center wlll be constructed for Land/Rlght-of-Way: $300,000
between 300 to 500 people. Construction: $3,300,000
Other: $0
Total: $4,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $1,000,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $3,000,000
RateslT axes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $4,000,000
Yearlv Expense SummarlJ - CapitallNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $]0,000 $390,000 $3,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: 2001 Operating Cost Amount: $100,000
SEPA Requited Yes
Other PermIts Yes
.
Funding Sources 1
Donation Private Developer $3,000,000
Fund Transfer Hotel/Motel funds $1,000,000
Notes: I $4,000,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 8
Department: Economic Development
Contact: Tim Smith
Justification:
A convention center will bnng addltional busmess to the City and downtown.
Impact if not executed:
A slower growing economy.
. [em arks
\
J
Downtown Convention Center
Project #: GG13-99
Area Map
.
SPECIFIC SITE
TO BE DETERMJNED
'f
~
--
o q D
\..-
,.
.
~~
REVIEW:
Department Head
Date:
Planning Director
Date:
Finance Director:
Date:
City Engineer:
Date:
City Manager:
Date: "
.
,
I
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
City Pier Dredging & Piling Replacement
Project #: GGOI-OO
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
The project Involves dredgmg at the moonng sIte of USCGC PlannlnglDeslgn: $25,000
Active. The project also provides necessary pIer pilIng Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
replacement. Construction: $100,000
Other: $0
Total $125,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $125,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $125,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv EXDense Summar - CaoitaVNet Operating
Prior Years 200t 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $15,000 $20,000 $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $125,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Qperating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer ICity - General Funds $125,000
Notes: I $125,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: ParksIPublic Works
Contact: Kenworthy/Connely
Justification:
Pier maintenance & USCG lease
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 10
Impact ifnot executed:
Lack of maintenance, potentIal loss of USCG lease.
Remarks
,I
j
City Pier Dredging & Piling Replacement
Project #: GGOI-OO
.
.
Area Map
PORT ANGELES HARBOR
.
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
\
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Marine Lab Expansion
Project #: GG02-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS project Involves expanding the Arthur D FeIro Marine PlanninglDeslgn: $50,000
LIfe Center along the waterfront area to attract and sefVlce a Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
greater audience and range of users. Construction. $5,000,000
Other: $0
Total: $5,050,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $5,050,000
RateslT axes. $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $5,050,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CapitallNet OperatinK
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$50,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $5,050,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
DonatIon Pri vate DonatIOns/Grants/Bonds $5,000,000
Grant CERB FeabIsility Grant $50,000
, $5,050,000
Notes: i
I I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Econormc Development
Contact: Tim Smith
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 9
Justification:
This project IS a Council goal to mamtain and develop CIty facIlitIes, especially in the Central Business
DIstnct (CBD) and waterfront area. ThIs project also enhances and Increases econormc development
in the CBD and downtown revitalization.
Impact if not executed:
Contmued difficulty to diversify the economy of downtown.
Remarks
-I
Marine Lab Expansion
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance DIrector: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: GG02-00
,
,
..
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Downtown Parking
Project #: GG03-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project IS to construct parkmg displaced by the International PlannlnglDesign: $200,000
Gateway Project and relieve congestion. Approximately 200 Land/Right-of-Way: $300,000
new spaces would be available. Construction' $1,500,000
Other' $0
Total: $2,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $90,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RatesfT axes: $0
Unknown: $1,910,000
Total: $2,000,000
Yearlv Expense Summar' - CaoitaVNet Operatine
Prior Years 1 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 I $0 $200,000 $300,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Yr Const Comp: I 1 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources 1
Fund Transfer General Fund $90,000
Unknown Private & Parking Revenue $1,910,000
Notes: I $2,000,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
.
Department: Economic Development
Contact: Gary K./Tim Smith
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 11
Justification:
Required parlong replacement m downtown area. Also, provides opportunity for street level business
space and potential for private condominium development.
Impact ifnot executed:
The Gateway construction will impact downtown parkIng in the area between Front Street, Railroad
Ave., Lmcoln and Laurel StreetS. Agreement with adopted downtown parking plan is to have no net
loss of parking from the International Gateway Project.
. ['markS \
J
Downtown Parking
Project #: GG03-00
Area Map
.
~
L
o
o u
'--
I
,..
.
. I~
~~
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
,
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Marketing Del Guzzi Dr. Property
Project #: GG05-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project Involves marketing of CIty owned Del Guzzi Drive PlannmglDesign: $40,000
property for sale. Rezone and PRD for technical business park. Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Construction: $0
Other: $0
Total: $40,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $40,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $40,000
SEPA Required No
Other Permits No
Year'v Expense Summar - CapitallNet Operatinfl
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer lGeneral Fund $40,000
Notes: I $40,000
I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Department: Economic Development
Contact: Tim Srmth
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 4
Justification:
Marketing of City owned property to pay of LID bonds and promote employment opportunities in
technical center.
Impact ifnot executed:
Financial burden to pay back LID bonds. Secure addItIonal bonds
Remarks
,1
J
Marketing Del Guzzi Dr. Property
Project #: GG05-00
.
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planmng Director Date:
Fmance DIrector: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Area Map
~ci
~i
:1
]
d ~
\
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Gateway Sign at Deer Park
Project #: GG06-00
.
.
J>rojectl>escri}1tion Estimated Project Costs
Project involves participatIon wIth Clallam County to construct Planning/Design: $0
Gateway signage at Deer Park Road. Land/Right-of-Way- $0
Construction- $0
Other' $60,000
Total: $60,000
Estimated J>roject Funding
Fund Transfer: $60,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RatesfT axes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $60,000
SEPA Required No
Other PermIts
No
Yearlv Exvense Summarll - CapitallNet Operatinfl
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000
Yr Const Comp: r -I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer IGeneral Fund [Assign STP funds to Clallam County] $60,000
Notes: -I $60,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Department: Economic Development
Division:
Cost Center:
Contact: Tim Smith DiVe Priority: 5
Justification:
Joint project with County for sign and amenities at Deer Park. Will improve entrance to City and
provide information for tourists.
Im}1act ifnot executed:
Not fulfilling agreement with County.
Remarks
Design is complete and in for review to WSDOT. Expected construction in 2001.
J
Gateway Sign at Deer Park
Area Map
Project #: GG06-00
.
€)
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
.
Laurel St. Stairs Repair
Project #: GGOI-Ol
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project mvolves the replacement offailmg wooden PlanmnglDesign: $25,000
stalTway with low maintenance concrete stairs whIch will Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
complement the fountam plaza and downtown improvements. Construction: $200,000
Other: $0
Total: $225,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $225,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $225,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Year/v Expense Summar" - Capita/INet Opera tine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $25,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $225,000
Yr Const Comp: 1 0 1 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
.
Funding Sources
Taxes IGeneral Fund $225,000
Notes: 1 $225,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 3
Justification:
The existing wooden stairway is failing and requIres increasing maintenance to provide safe passage.
The staIrway is unsightly and detracts from the recent downtown improvements.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued high maintenance costs. Detracts from Improvements made to the fountain plaza.
.
Remarks
[
I
\j
/
Laurel St. Stairs Repair
Project #: GGOI-Ol
Area Map
.
~
~
1
vv--
D D n
\--
.
. ,p
,
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
,
,
~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Laurel St. Pavers (Railroad Ave. to 1st St.)
Project #: GG02-01
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project involves replacing the sIdewalk on the west sIde Planning/Design' $30,000
of Laurel St. (Railroad Ave. to 1st Street) WIth pavers to match Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
the rest of the downtown area. Construction: $320,000
Other. $0
Total: $350,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer' $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes' $350,000
Unknown, $0
Total: $350,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CapitaVNet Operatin!!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $320,000 $0 $350,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Taxes IGeneral Fund $350,000
I $350,000
,Notes: I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: PublIc Works & Utilities Division: Engineering
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Justification:
Complete the sIdewalk replacement with pavers In the downtown area.
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 35
Impact if not executed:
The west sIde of Laurel St. would not match the east half and the rest of downtown. This is the
primary entrance from the waterfront and ferry landing.
Remarks
The estImate does not Include the access to the "underground" store front in the north half of the
Front/First block. The estimated added cost would be approxImately $100,000, Including design.
Laurel St. Pavers (Railroad Ave. to 1st St.)
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: GG02-01
..
,
,
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Radio Communications
Project #:
PDOl-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs PENCOM project involves the replacement of existmg PlannlnglDeslgn" $0
"radIO commumcations systems" for the PolIce and FIfe Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Departments to comply WIth antIcipated FCC (Federal Construction $0
Communications Commission) regulatIOns regardmg spectrum Other $500,000
use, includmg ability to receive and transmIt hIgh speed data Total: $500,000
and mtegrate a Regional Public Safety Communications system. Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $350,000
RateslTaxes: $150,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $500,000
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
Yearlv Expense Summar - CapitallNet Operatine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation Contractual Agencies $150,000
Grant Unknown $200,000
Taxes General Fund Reserves $150,000
Notes: I $500,000
City Priority:
Department: Police
Contact: Naomi Wu
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division: PENC
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 1
Justification:
Public safety response IS cntically dependent upon communications. It is speculated by most
communications managers that the FCC will soon mandate a change to a 800 mH system which will
reqUIre major "radio hardware" changes. The spectrum change will enable public safety
communications to facilitate multiple frequencies, handle complicated high speed data transmissions
and create a more effective and efficient method of operation with the more modern technology.
CommumcatIOns during cntical incidents will be more efficient and effective.
Impact if not executed:
RadIO communications durmg critical mcidents could and probably will become slower and more
unreliable as radio traffic mcreases while using current technology.
Remarks
Includes objectives of Fire and General Government previously m FR09( deleted)
J
Radio Communications
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head \ 1~ f: .I?~;I" Q:>
Planning Director
Finance Director:
City Engtneer:
City Manager:
Project #: PDOl-99
.
.
Date: 6:/60/ () I
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Lincoln Park Enhancements
Project #:
PK02-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS Parks project mvolves renovatmg the campground and PlanmnglDeslgn: $0
Improvements to the trail system. The project will also proVIde Land/Right-of-Way. $0
improvements to the pond area includmg adding fishing piers, Construction: $300,000
observatIOn areas, and paving the traIl and dIke for improved Other: $0
handicap access. Total: $300,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer. $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $225,000
RateslTaxes: $75,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $300,000
SEPA Requlfed
No
Other PermIts
No
Yearlv Expense Summan _ CaDitallNet ODeratin!!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Yr Const Comp: I I First Year of Operating Cost: 2004 Operating Cost Amount: $25,000
Funding Sources
Donation Proceeds from the sale of timber $75,000
Grant WWRP - lAC grant $150,000
Taxes General Fund - reserves $75,000
jNotes: 1 $300,000
City Priority:
Department: Parks
Contact: Marc Connelly
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 10
Justification:
Enhancements WIll prOVIde facilitIes for public use. Improvements to the campground will provide
better services to campers who visit our community. Trail and pond improvements will enhance
commumty use and provide better accessibility to the handicapped.
Impact ifnot executed:
Under utilIzatIOn of FacIlity
Remarks
r
Lincoln Park Enhancements
REVIEW:
Department Head //f:J----
Planmng Director
Finance Director:
Area Map
City Engineer:
City Manager:
Date:
Project #: PK02-99
.
.
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Construct New Parks Shop/Apparatus Storage
Project #:
PK03-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
This Parks project involves constructIon of a maIntenance Planning/Design. $10,000
buildIng to house the parks mamtenance dIvision, as well as Land/Rlght-of-Way. $0
P AFD Apparatus. Construction. $150,000
Other: $0
Total: $160,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Ratesrraxes. $160,000
Unknown: $0
Total. $160,000
SEPA Required No
Other PermIts
No
Yearlv Expense Summan _ CapitaVNet Operatinf!
Prior Years T 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $160,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: 2002 Operating Cost Amount: $1,000
Funding Sources
Taxes IGeneral Fund - reserves $160,000
Notes: I $160,000
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
City Priority:
Department: ParksIFire
Contact: Marc C./McKeen
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 8
Justification:
A larger building IS needed to house the parks maintenance dIvISIOn personnel, supplies and small
equipment. The dIVisions maIntenance responsibIlIties have outgrown the present building, requiring
supplies and equipment to be stored at various locations In the park system and outside.
Impact ifnot executed:
Inefficient use of manpower.
Remarks
Includes objectIves of FIfe project FR08( deleted)
J
Construct New Parks Shop/Apparatus Storage
Area Map
Project #: PK03-99
.
.
REVIEW:
Department Head ~
Planning Director
Finance DIrector:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
c);)---, 23---u(
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
IcefY outh Pavilion
Project #: PK05-99
~-------
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Parks project lDvolves constructIOn of an Ice nnk and Planning/Design: $0
youth facility. Land/Rlght-of-Way' $0
Construction: $3,000,000
Other $0
Total" $3,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $1,500,000
Unknown: $1,500,000
Total: $3,000,000
SEPA Required No
Other Permits
No
Yearlv Exoense Summar. - Capita/INet Ooeratin!!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: 2005 Operating Cost Amount: $100,000
Funding Sources
Taxes General Fund - property taxes $1,500,000
Unknown Unknown $1,500,000
Notes:] $3,000,000
City Priority:
Department: Parks
Contact: Marc Connelly
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 15
Justification:
ThIs proposal is in response to continued community input, including the 1994 public heanngs
regardmg the CFP.
Impact ifnot executed:
[NO facility.
Remarks
Needs prehmmary feaslbihty study and analysIs pnor to assIgmng capItal cost information.
J
Ice/Y outh Pavilion
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Director
Finance Director:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
~
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Project #: PK05-99
.
.
05"-2J~OI
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Pier Breakwater/Waterfront Park
Project #:
PK06-99
.--------
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs Parks project involves construction of a breakwater to Planning/Design: $0
protect the CIty Pier and Hollywood Beach from NE storms m Land/Rlght-of-Way' $0
phase 1. Phase 2 would see constructIOn of beach, pICnIC, Construction: $5,000,000
volleyball, and grassy areas at Hollywood Beach. Other: $0
Total. $5,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $300,000
RateslTaxes: $2,500,000
Unknown: $2,200,000
Total. $5,000,000
SEPA Required
No
Other PermIts
No
Yearlv Expense Summar _ CavitallNet Operatinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 I $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $5,000,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: 2004 Operating Cost Amount: $15,000
Funding Sources
Grant WWRP - IAC grant $300,000
Taxes General Fund - property taxes $2,500,000
Unknown Unknown $2,200,000
jNotes: I $5,000,000
City Priority:
Department: Parks
Contact: Marc Connelly
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 14
Justification:
ThIs project allows moorage faclltttes to be in place year around, provides a downtown/waterfront
focal point and compliments the proposed marine lab expansion.
Impact if not executed:
[NO breakwater. \
Remarks
EstImate made WIthout prior coastal engineering. Environmental regulations and grant fundmg cycles
will affect project tuning. Costs for bIOlogIcal assessment will need incluSIOn.
J
Pier Breakwater/Waterfront Park
REVIEW:
Department Head -741JC
Planning Director
Finance Director:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
Area Map
Project #: PK06-99
.
.
.
.
.
.
, ,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Pool Enhancements
Project #:
PK15-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Parks project mvolves renovatmg the locker rooms, PlannlnglDeslgn. $0
replacmg the circulatlOn/chlonne system, adding a hydro Land/Right-of-Way $0
therapy area, and repamng the north wall of the eXIstmg pool Construction: $2,800,000
building. Other. $0
Total. $2,800,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $275,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $275,000
Unknown' $2,250,000
Total: $2,800,000
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
Yearlv Expense Summan - CapitallNet OperatinJ!
Prior Years 2001 I 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 , $0 $0 $2,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,800,000
Yr Const Comp: T 2003 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $250,000
Funding Sources 1
Fund Transfer Surplus bond proceeds from Senior Center bond issue $275,000
Taxes General Fund - property taxes $275,000
Unknown 0 $2,250,000
I $2,800,000
Notes: I
City Priority:
Department: Parks
Contact: Marc Connelly
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 7
Justification:
Replaces antiquated water treatment system, corrects structural problem with wall, brings locker
rooms up to current standards, and generally enhances the community's abIlity to utIlIze the facility.
Impact ifnot executed:
High maintenance costs, less attractive pool, contmued schedule and use conflIcts at facility.
Remarks
PrelIminary, renovatIon plan completed in January 1999. Needs review by renovation committee, Park
Board and City Council.
J
Pool Enhancements
Project #: PK15-99
Area Map
REVIEW:
~
I COUNTY COURTHOUSE ~
FOURTH ST.
.
r-
U)
z
-1
o
()
Z
-1
CITY HALL
.
Date: tJ5/- 2J--6(
Department Head ~
Planning DIrector
Finance Director:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
.
,
I
I
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Street Trees - City East Entrance
Project #: PK16-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs Parks project involves developmg a street tree program PlanninglDesign' $0
for the east entrance of CIty, Delguzzi Dr. to Lmcoln 8t. Land/Right-of-Way. $0
Project is proposed to be completed m phases of 50 trees per Construction: $25,000
year for 4 years. Other: $50,000
Total: $75.000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/Taxes: $75.000
Unknown: $0
Total: $75.000
SEPA Required No
Other Permits No
Yearlv Exoense Summar - Caoital/Net Ooeratinf!
Prior Years I 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$25,000 I $0 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
Yr Const Comp:T 2001 First Year of Operating Cost: 2000 Operating Cost Amount: $15,000
Funding Sources
Taxes Iproperty Taxes $75,000
Notes: I $75,000
City Priority:
Department: Parks
Contact: Marc Connelly
Justification:
Enhancement to City Entrance
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 5
IImpact if not executed,
Remarks
Design and constructIOn to be coordinated with project TR74
J
Street Trees - City East Entrance
Area Map
Project #: PK16-99
,
,
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Director
Finance Director:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
~
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
~-;:r~ 23 - OJ
,
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Covered Tennis Courts
Project #:
PK18-99
JProjectl>escription Estimated JProject Costs
This Parks project involves placmg a cover over tenms courts Planning/Design- $0
at Enckson Playfield or at the hIgh school. Land/Right-of-Way- $0
Construction $100,000
Other. $0
Total: $100,000
Estimated JProject Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $20,000
Ratesrr axes: $80,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $100,000
-------
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
Yearlv Expense Summar _ CapitallNet Opera tin!!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Yr Const Comp: r I First Year of Operating Cost: 2005 Operating Cost Amount: $2,500
Funding Sources
Donation PA Tenms ClublYMCA $20,000
Taxes General Fund $80,000
Notes: l $100,000
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
City Priority:
Department: Parks
Contact: Marc Connelly
Justification:
Local condItIOns do not allow play in "off-season"
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 12
Division:
Impact ifnot executed:
Lack of tennis facibties m Winter
Remarks
I
J
Covered Tennis Courts
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Director
Finance Director:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
~?----
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Project #: PK18-99
..
..
~-25-(]/
r
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Centennial Trail-ITT to Lees Crk.
Project #:
PK23-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
ThIs Parks project mvolves the extension of the trail from the PlannlnglDeslgn' $10,000
eastern Rayonier fence east 3800 ft to Lees Creek. If grant Land/Rlght-of-Way. $0
funds allow, thIS would also proVIde a rough extension of the Construction: $240,000
trail to Morse Creek. Work mvolves confirmatIOn of the nght- Other: $0
of-way, grading, drainage, and partial paving. Total $250,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $250,000
RateslT axes: $0
Unknown' $0
Total $250,000
SEPA ReqUIred No
Other Permits
No
Yearlv Expense Summarv - CapitallNet Operatin!!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Yr Const Comp: T First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant IISTEA grant program $250,000
Notes: I $250,000
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
City Priority:
Department: Parks
Contact: Parks/Public Works
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 3
Justification:
This project is the extenSIOn of the trail east of the Rayonier Mill to Lees Creek.
Impact ifnot executed:
Delay completion of the Waterfront Trail.
Remarks
I
J
Centennial Trail-ITT to Lees Crk.
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Duector
Finance Director:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
/7lJz---
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Project #: PK23-99
.
.
() j- -- '2 ") - t:? I
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Waterfront Trail-Valley Crk.
Project #: PK25-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Parks project mvolves the constructlOn of a trail from Oak Planning/Design: $7,000
to Valley: (Length 1500 ft @ 321ft, lightmg 15 @ 1200 each, Land/Right-of-Way: $0
landscapmg/engineering. ) Construction' $143,000
Other. $0
Total' $150,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donallons/Grants/Loans. $150,000
RateslTaxes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $150,000
SEPA Required No
Other Permits No
Yearlv EXDense Summar - CapitallNet OperatinJl
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$75,000 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation Community $75,000
Grant ALEA $75,000
Notes: 1 - $150,000
City Priority:
Department: Parks
Contact: Marc Connelly
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 2
Justification:
This spur would increase access to the Centennial Trail, completIon of uplands area.
Impact if not executed:
INO trail in area.
Remarks
Project also includes completlOn of trail sectIons WIthin the uplands park area, as well as landscapmg
and park amemtIes for the uplands area.
J
W aterfront Trail-Valley Crk.
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Director
Finance Director:
City Engineer:
CIty Manager:
~
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Project #: PK25-99
.
.
01~23 - of
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
----
Project #:
PK26-99
.
Centennial Trail- Lees Crk to Morse Crk
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs Parks project involves the constructlOn (gradmg, dramage Planning/Design: $0
and paving) of the trail 6000 feet from Lees Creek to Morse Land/Rlght-of-Way: $40,000
Creek. Construction: $300,000
Other, $0
Total' $340,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer' $0
Donations/Grants/Loans' $170,000
Rates/Taxes: $170,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $340,000
SEPA Required No
Other Permits No
Yearly Expense Summar _ CaoitallNet Ooeratinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$40,000 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $340,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant ISTEA, DNR, lAC $170,000
Taxes General Fund - property taxes $170,000
Notes: I $340,000
.
City Priority:
Department: Parks
Contact: Marc Connelly
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 9
Justification:
This would contmue the traIl to Morse Creek and allow greater access to the shorelme.
Impact if not executed:
ro trail \
Remarks
. I I
j
Centennial Trail - Lees Crk to Morse Crk
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning DIrector
Finance Director:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
rJ/~
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Project #: PK26-99
.
.
C.:5 -:.- 23 - cY
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Golf Course/Rec Complex
Project #:
PK62-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs Parks project Involves the constructIOn of an 18 hole Planning/Design' $500,000
municipal golf course and a rec complex that would mclude a Land/Rlghl-of-Way. $1,650,000
golf driving range, softball fields, etc. This project was started Conslrucllon' $4.500.000
In 1994 and awaiting a market/feasibIlIty study to determine Olher: $0
whether to proceed. Total: $6.650,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donallons/Granls/Loans: $0
RaleslTaxes: $6,650,000
Unknown: $0
Tolal: $6,650.000
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
Yearlv Expense Summar _ CapitallNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $3,325,000 $3,325,000 $0 $6,650,000
Yr Const Comp: I I First Year of Operating Cost: 2006 Operating Cost Amount: ($500,000)
Funding Sources
Taxes IV oted Bond Issue - property taxes $6,650,000
Notes: I $6,650,000
i
City Priority:
Department: Parks
Contact: Marc Connelly
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 13
Justification:
This project provides enhanced recreatIOn opportumties as well as economic/tourism development.
This project would only happen if it were determined that it would provide the city with a net positive
cash flow.
Impact ifnot executed:
INO golf eo""elree complex.
Remarks
Initial feasibIlIty study completed in 1996. Study IS out of date. AddItional research done in 1998.
With the Immment closure of the CIty Landfill, further investigation regardIng the feasibilIty of
utIlizml! the sIte is warranted.
)
Golf Course/Rec Complex
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Director
Finance Director:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
~7---
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Project #: PK62-99
.
.
IY5r-25-c) f
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Waterfront Trail Through Rayonier
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS Parks project involves provIding for the extenSIOn of the Planning/Design: $31,800
Waterfront Trail from the west gate of Rayonier through the Land/Rlght-of-Way $700,000
mill to the east fence of Rayomer. The work will involve an Construction: $248,000
agreement WIth the mIll for right of use, fencing, gradmg, Other: $0
asphalt paving of the trail in some places, signage and Total: $979,800
coordmation of the design with the mill. Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $904,800
Rates/Taxes: $75,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $979,800
Project #: PK76-99
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits No
Yearlv Expense Summar - Capital/Net Opera tin!!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $979,800 $979,800
Yr Canst Camp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
DonatIOn Rayonier $829,800
Grant ISTEA $75,000
Taxes General Fund $75,000
Notes: I $979,800
I
.
City Priority:
Department: Parks
Contact: Marc Connelly
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 4
Justification:
This sectIOn of the Waterfront Trail will allow for the next logical extension of the trail to the east and
access to a very good beach on the east SIde of the Rayomer Mill. This extension is essential to
provide for the access to the trail to the east. Without the completion of this section, using other grant
sources east of the mIll will be difficult due to the lack of continuity of the trail. Grant funds through
the mill would be difficult to use due to the right of way issues involved.
Impact if not executed:
Not constructing this sectIOn of the traIl in a tImely way will make development of the trail to the east
harder.
.
Remarks
I
j
Waterfront Trail Through Rayonier
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Director
Finance Director:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
/?JP-
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Project #: PK76-99
.
.
() 5~- 23--0/
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Civic Field Enhancements
Project #: PK77-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS Parks project Involves mstallIng addItIonal seating, PlannmglDeslgn, $0
upgradmg and expanding lighting and concrete repalTs. Land/Rlght-of-Way $0
Construction: $100,000
Other' $0
Total $100,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $50,000
RateslTaxes: $50,000
Unknown: $0
Total' $100,000
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits No
Yearlv Expense Summar 1- CapitallNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 I 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Yr Const Comp: T First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant Unknown $50,000
Taxes General Fund - property taxes $50,000
Notes: i $100,000
I
I
City Priority:
Department: Parks
Contact: Marc Connelly
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Division:
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 11
Justification:
ThIs project protects the value of one of the city's most utilized assets. It provides for the upgrading
and enhancement of the facility by providing concrete repairs to the stadium, needed additional
seating, and Improved field lighting for the safety of the facility users.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued deterioration of Civic FIeld.
Remarks
I
J
Civic Field Enhancements
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planning Director
Finance Director:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
~
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Project #: PK77-99
.
.
0:5-- 2')'-cJ(
.
I
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Remodel/Expand Fine Arts Center
Project #: PK98-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs Parks project Involves remodelmg and modernizing the Planning/Design. $0
admimstrative WIng, bUIlding an expansion to the exhibIt area, Land/Right-of-Way: $0
and developing the estate property mto a park. Construction: $650,000
Other: $0
Total: $650,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $500,000
Ratesrraxes: . $150,000
Unknown' $0
Total: $650,000
SEPA Required No
Other Permits No
Yearlv Expense Summar - Capital/Net Operatin!!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $250,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $650,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
DonatIon FIne Arts Center FoundatIOn $250,000
Grant Unknown $250,000
Taxes Property Taxes $150,000
Notes: I $650,000
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
City Priority:
Department: Parks
Contact: Marc Connelly
Justification:
WIll allow expansion of educational and cultural programs at the center.
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 6
Division: Fine
Impact if not executed:
IStatus quo.
. Remarks
I
I
I
Remodel/Expand Fine Arts Center
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head
Planmng Director
Finance Director:
City Engineer:
City Manager:
~
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Project #: PK98-99
~
lit
05---- 27--0/
.
I
I
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Francis Street Improvements
Project #:
PKOI-OO
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs Parks administratIve project mvolves Francis Street Park Planning/Design: $50,000
development at the Waterfront Trail as the CIty's millennium Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
pro] ect. Construction: $387,000
Other. $0
Total: $437,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $187,000
Donallons/Grants/Loans: $250,000
RateslT axes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $437,000
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summan~ - CapitallNet Opera tin/!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $437,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $437,000
Yr Const Comp: I 2001 First Year of Operating Cost: 2001 Operating Cost Amount: $5,000
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer General Fund $187,000
Grant lAC Grant $250,000
Notes: I $437,000
I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Department: Parks & Recreation
Contact: Marc Connelly
Division: Adrmn
Cost Center:
Div. Priority:
Justification:
ContmuatIon of park and traIl development along with future wastewater CSO facilItIes.
Impact ifnot executed:
Loss of opportunity for jomt Parks / Wastewater CSO improvements.
tI remarb
J
Francis Street Improvements
Project #: PKOI-OO
,
Area Map
e
~
...: ...: t
tIl II)
] ~l J)J ~ J\ 1(L\1 !f II (J d~[ ,
GEORGII>N A ST.
l r N V 11
REVIEW:
1l~
Date: S - "Z...:> - o~
Department Head
Planning Director
Date:
Finance Director:
Date:
City Engineer:
Date:
City Manager:
Date:
,
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Landfill Transfer Station
Project #: SW31-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This SolId Waste project involves the constructIOn of a transfer Planning/Design: $200,000
station at the landfill to accommodate long hauling of solId Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
waste once the landfill IS closed. Construction: $1,800,000
Other. $0
Total" $2,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RatesfT axes: $2,000,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $2,000,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts No
Yearlv Expense Summar" - CapitaVNet Operatinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $500,000 $1,300,000 $2,000,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates ISolid Waste Rates $2,000,000
Notes: 1 $2,000,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: Yes
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Solid Waste
Contact: Glenn A. Cutler
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 1
Justification:
Constructing a transfer station at the landfill is the least expensive option for disposal of solid waste
once the landfill is closed.
Impact ifnot executed:
More expensive transfer station built elsewhere.
Remarks
I
)
Landfill Transfer Station
Project #: SW31-99
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Area Map
.
g
~
i
E:l>GEWOoD M.
tit
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
.
Landfill Closure
Project #: SW35-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs Solid Waste project Involves final closure of the CIty's Planning/Design: $550,000
landfill once we are no longer able to dispose of solid waste Land/Right-of-Way: $0
because of the requirements of the FAA. Construction: $3,850,000
Other: $0
Total: $4,400,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $5,000,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $5,000,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summa~ _ CapitallNet ODeratinx
Prior Years I 2001 2002 I 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $2,400,000
Yr Const Comp: T First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: SO
.
Funding Sources
Rates ISolid Waste Rates $5,000,000
Notes: I $5,000,000
Final closure to be in year 2007. The projected estimate is $2,600,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: Yes
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Solid Waste
Contact: Glenn A. Cutler
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 2
Justification:
The FAA is requiring us to close the landfill because of its proximity to the airport and the potential
for bird/airplane incidents.
Impact ifnot executed:
Violation oflaw.
.
Remarks
[
\
J
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Landfill Closure
Area Map
.
Project #: SW35-99
.
i
0:>
!it
...
:J:
5
5
.
EDlOElYOOD DR.
~
A
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
1 st and Peabody Signal
Project #:
TR02-99
I Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
This project mvolves upgrading the eXIstmg sIgnal with PlanmnglDeslgn: $8,000
pedestrian sIgnals, pre-emption traffic loops, drainage, ADA, Land/Right-of-Way: $0
channelIzation, and larger signal heads on mast arms. Construction. $192,000
Other: $0
Total: $200,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $180,000
RateslT axes: $20,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $200,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense SummarlJ - CaoitallNet Ooerating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $192,000 $0 $200,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant TEA-21 or HES Funds $180,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund Reserves $20,000
Notes: I $200,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & UtIlities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 27
Justification:
The existmg SIgnal is constructed with poles and span WIres and old style and sized signal heads
without loop detectIOn or pedestrian SIgnals. Installation of an updated signal configuration will
improve safety and the efficiency of the signal to move traffic on 8th Street, which is a vital arterial
across the city.
Impact ifnot executed:
If not funded the current signal WIll continue to provide service for the mtersectIon, but at a lower
service level. As traffic mcreases on Peabody Street, the need for this upgrade will increase.
Remarks
I
J
1st and Peabody Signal
Area Map
Project #: TR02-99
,.
'-
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
'-
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Laurel Street/ Ahlvers Road Reconstruction
Project #:
TR04-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project Involves reconstructIng Laurel Street from Planning/Design. $100,000
Viewcrest to Ahlvers Road and Ahlvers Road from Laurel Land/Rlght-of-Way: $100,000
Street to Canyon Edge providmg a 40 foot wIde roadway, curb, Construction' $1,000,000
gutter, sIdewalks and draInage control. Other: $0
Total: $1,200,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $300,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $700,000
RateslT axes. $200,000
Unknown: $0
Total' $1,200,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summar - CaoitallNet Ooeratinf!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer LID ConstructIon Fund $300,000
Grant AIP or TPP Grant $700,000
Taxes General fund - Real Estate ExcIse Tax $200,000
Notes: I $1,200,000
I
I
I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: PublIc Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 33
Justification:
The eXIsting roadway is narrow WIth ditches on both sides, except where developments have provided
the Improvements. The area served by these arterials is grOWIng creating the need to widen these
roadways.
Impact ifnot executed:
ContInued use of narrow roadways without sidewalks.
Remarks
I
Project #: TR04-99
Laurel Street/ Ahlvers Road Reconstruction
,
Area Map
C L MBUS
VASHON AV .
PARK AVE.
HIGH
SCHOOL
~
(/)
~
<(
o
~
(/)
t--
Z
W
o
w
n:::
VIEWCREST AVE.
r--=
(/)
>-
a
o
ro
<(
w
Q.
,
AHLVERS RD.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
,
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Hill Street Intersection Reconstruction
Project #:
TR05-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project involves reconstructmg the alIgnment of the Hill PlanninglDeslgn: $30,000
Street and 4th Street and 4th Street to Manne Drive. Land/Rlght-of-Way. $0
Construction: $270,000
Other: $0
Total: $300,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $100,000
RateslT axes: $200,000
Unknown" $0
Total: $300,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar' - CapitallNet Operatinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant AIP Grant $100,000
Taxes General Fund - Real Estate Excise Tax $200,000
Notes: I $300,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 43
Justification:
This mtersectIon occurs at the top of a hill which makes the sight distance a problem for the
intersection. The reconstruction would remove the sight distance problem.
Impact if not executed:
Contmued use of the intersection in its current layout.
~ (em.r~
J
Hill Street Intersection Reconstruction
Area Map
Project #: TR05-99
,.
+
,.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
CIty Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,.
,
,
~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
8th and "e" Street Signal
Project #:
TR06-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project Involves installing a new traffic sIgnal at the 8th PlanmnglDeslgn' $15,000
Street and "C" Street intersection. Land/Rlght-of-Way $0
Construction' $185,000
Other: $0
Total' $200,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $200,000
Unknown' $0
Total: $200,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summar - CaoitallNet Ooeratin1!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Taxes IGeneral Fund - Street Fund $200,000
INotes: I $200,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 45
Justification:
As the west end of the CIty contInues to grow, this intersection WIll reach a point where a signal is
needed to meet the needs of traffic traveling north and south across 8th Street. Currently the
north/south legs have stop signs.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued use of the eXIsting IntersectIOn WIth Increased accidents and delays.
Remarks
This project should be coordinated with Eighth Street bridge replacement.
J
8th and "e" Street Signal
Project #: TR06-99
,
Area Map
~/
/,
..
&l;y
Sl'
1<1;.
Iy s;-
,
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engtneer: Date:
CIty Manager: Date:
,.
,
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Milwaukee Drive Phase I
Project #: TR07-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS project will extend Milwaukee Dnve in two phases. Phase PlanmnglDeslgn: $200,000
I would extend the roadway from "N" Street to 18th Street and Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Phase II would extend the roadway from 18th Street to the Construction: $1,800,000
Lower Elwha Road. Other. $0
Total: $2,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $0
Unknown: $2,000,000
Total: $2,000,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CaDitallNet Operatinfo!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Unknown I Unfunded $2,000,000
Notes: I $2,000,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 42
Justification:
The extension of Milwaukee Drive to the west IS consistent with the CIty ComprehenSIve Plan to
provide service to the west end of the city.
Impact ifnot executed:
IAn mcomplete arterial network system.
Remarks
,1
I
I
J
J
Milwaukee Drive Phase I
Project #: TR07-99
Area Map
.....
'"
~
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engmeer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,.
,.
,.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Milwaukee Drive Phase II
Project #:
TR08-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project wIll extend MIlwaukee Dnve III two phases. Phase PlanmnglDeslgn $350,000
I would extend the roadway from "N" Street to 18th Street and Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Phase II would extend the roadway from 18th Street to the Construclion. $3,150,000
Lower Elwha Road. Other $0
Total. $3,500,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer. $0
Donalions/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/T axes' $3,500,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $3,500,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
I Yearlv EXDense Summar' - CaDitallNet Operating
r Prior Years I 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $3,500,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Taxes IGeneral Fund - Street Fund $3,500,000
Notes: I $3,500,000
I
I
City Pr~ority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: PublIc Works & UtilItIes Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 47
Justification:
The extensIOn of MIlwaukee Drive to the west IS conSIstent with the CIty ComprehenSIve Plan to
provide serVIce to the west end of the CIty.
Impact if not executed:
IAn mcompJete artenal network system.
Remarks
I
I
I
Milwaukee Drive Phase II
Area Map
ci
0::
<:(
~
..J
UJ
0::
~
9
Project #: TR08-99
ci
Ck:
9
w
u:
J:
~
=>
0::
U
EDGEWOOD OR.
,
,
,
,
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
10th Street Reconstruction
Project #:
TRIO-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project mvolves reconstructing 10th Street from "N" PlanmnglDeslgn: $70,000
Street to Milwaukee Drive WIth curb, gutter, sIdewalk and 40 Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
foot wide roadway and 37 foot wIde roadway beyond Construction: $630,000
MIlwaukee Dnve to the end, including Flores St. Other: $0
Total: $700,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Ratesrr axes: $140,000
Unknown: $560,000
Total: $700,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CaDita/INet Operatinf!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $630,000 $0 $700,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $140,000
Unknown Unfunded $560,000
Notes: I $700,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: PublIc Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 30
Justification:
10th Street IS an Important arterial connectmg east and west from "N" Street to MIlwaukee Drive.
There are no sidewalks and the existing roadway is narrow by arterial standards.
Impact if not executed:
Contmued use of the existmg facility.
, remark,
J
10th Street Reconstruction
Area Map
Project #: TRIO-99
tit
c
..
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
..
,
I
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
8th Street Bridges Repairs
Project #:
TR11-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project involves repamng structural elements found m the Planning/Design. $0
even year inspections. This work will occur m the odd Land/Rlght-of-Way $0
numbered years. Construction: $300,000
Other: $0
Total: $300,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/T axes. $300,000
Unknown: $0
Total. $300,000
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
Yearlv Exoense Summar - CaoitallNet Ooeratin!!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Taxes IGeneral Fund $300,000
,Notes: i $300,000
!
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: Yes
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Department: Public Works & UtIhtIes Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 7
Justification:
The mspectlOn of the 8th Street Bndges every even year IS reqUIred by the State Bndge Inspection
Program. The repamng of the deficiencies found m the mspections is scheduled m the odd numbered
years and is a logical element of the required mspection program.
Impact ifnot executed:
Not performmg the repalTS of the bridges would be against the State Bridge InspectIon Program. Lack
of conformance with this program would lead to the rapid decay of these bridges and resultant
exposure of the traffic to potentIal danger. UltImately the lack of repairs would lead to the postmg of
. .
Remarks
~I
8th Street Bridges Repairs
Area Map
Project #: TRll-99
'-
'-
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning DIrector Date:
Finance DIrector: Date:
CIty Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
~ Remarks
I
,
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Park Avenue Reconstruction [Peabody to Race]
Project #: TR12-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project mvolves reconstructmg Park Avenue from Planning/Design: $100,000
Peabody Street to Race Street with curb, gutter, sidewalks and Land/Right-of-Way: $0
a 40 foot wide roadway. Construction: $900,000
Other: $0
Total: $1,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $800,000
Ratesrr axes: $200,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $1,000,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summar - CaoitaVNet Ooeratinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 I $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $900,000 $0 $1,000,000
Yr Const Comp: I I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation School DIStrict $25,000
Grant AIP Grant $775,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $200,000
Notes: I $1,000,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 32
Justification:
The existing roadway is narrow and without sidewalks or drainage control other than ditches. This
arterial serves the area by the College and the south SIde of an elementary school.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued use of the narrow roadway.
J
Park Avenue Reconstruction [Peabody to Race]
Project #: TR12-99
,
Area Map
'-
~
UJ
a
o WHIDBEY AVE.
<(
w
n...
VE.
HIGHLAND AVE.
GRAN T AVE.
~
(I)
~
~
V)
I-
Z
W
o
w
Ct:
OL YMPUS AVE.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
'-
I
I
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
City-Wide Traffic Signal Interconnect/Pre-emption
Project #:
TR13-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project mvolves acquiring the equipment to interconnect Planning/Design: $50,000
all the traffic signals to the city to allow computer control of Land/Right-of-Way: $0
the signals to improve traffic flow. The project also mvolves Construction: $450,000
installing ore-emption on all remaming signals and all Other. $0
emergency vehicles. Total: $500,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $0
Unknown: $500,000
Total: $500,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv EXDense SummaTlI- CapitallNet ODeratine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Unknown I Unfunded $500,000
Notes: I $500,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 44
Justification:
EXIsting signals are eIther fixed timed controllers or traffic actuated by loops in the street. Installation
of operation of a computerized traffic control system would allow the entIre signal system to work as a
unit. DIfferent areas ofthe city have very different traffic control issues that must be dealt wit, but
often dealing with those areas individually impact other areas. The morning and evening peak traffic
flows of State Route 101 could be dealt WIth more efficiently with a fully programmable computer
controlled traffic sIgnal system as could traffic to and from the Victoria Ferries m the downtown.
Impact ifnot executed:
!Continued use o[the old controllers.
Remarks
~I
I
I
J
City-Wide Traffic Signal Interconnect/Pre-emption Project #: TR13-99
Area Map
,
'-
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance DIrector: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
,
I
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
White's Creek Crossing
Project #: TR14-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves providing for an artenal crossing of PlannmglDeslgn: $500,000
White's Creek to connect Golf Course Road with Race Street. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $750,000
Construction" $5,000,000
Other: $0
Total: $6,250,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $0
Unknown: $6,250,000
Total: $6,250,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CaDitallNet ODeratinf!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000 $5,000,000 $6,250,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Unknown IUnfunded $6,250,000
Notes: I $6,250,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: Yes
Contract: Yes
Department: PublIc Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 38
Justification:
The City's Comprehensive Plan describes the need for an additional east/west cross town arterial. This
arterial will need to cross White's Creek at either 5th Street or Lauridsen Blvd or some other location.
This artenalIs necessary to improve east/west circulation of traffic and Improve emergency servIces.
Impact ifnot executed:
rot following the Comp Plan.
Remarks
_I
I
I
i
J
White's Creek Crossing
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
CIty Manager: Date:
Project #: TR14-99
,
~
Il1l
tI:l
g
o
r..
S
- 0
"-..:
,~?
'-
,
,
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
18th Street Reconstruction
Project #: TR16-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS project involves reconstructing 18th Street from the Planning/Design: $300,000
Landfill to "E" Street with curb, gutter, sidewalks and a 40 foot Land/Right-of-Way: $0
roadway. Construction: $3,000,000
Other: $0
Total: $3,300,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $0
Unknown: $3,300,000
Total: $3,300,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summar' - CaoitaVNet Dveratinf!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $3,000,000 $3,300,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Unknown lUnfunded $3,300,000
Notes: I $3,300,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & UtilIties Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: '36
Justification:
The existing roadway IS becommg too narrow to handle the traffic as the area grows. There are no
sidewalks for foot traffic and bicycles have difficulty with conflicts with vehicles.
Impact ifnot executed:
rontmued use oflhe narrow roadway.
Remarks
~I
I
I
J
t Reconstruction
18th Stree
Area Map
o
It:
9
'<l
Ii:
~
::;)
5
EDGE'M:loo DR.
REVIEW:
rtment Head
Depa
Planning Director
Finance Director:
City EngIneer:
City Manager:
Project #: TR16-99
,.
':I\T\t"-11 .....
'-
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
,
I
I
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Truck Route at USIOl Intersection
Project #:
TR17 -99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project involves provIdmg westbound to northbound Planmng/Deslgn: $150,000
access from US 1 0 1 to the Tumwater Truck Route. Land/Right-of-Way $150,000
Construction. $850,000
Other: $0
Total $1,150,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $0
Unknown: $1,150,000
Total. $1,150,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CapitallNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $850,000 $0 $1,150,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Unknown I Unfunded $1,150,000
iNotes: I $1,150,000
I I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: Yes
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 22
Justification:
The City ComprehensIve Plan describes the need to provide truck access from the westbound direction
onto the Truck Route In the northbound dIrection. This abIlity would provide for another method for
trucks to reach the harbor wIthout using the downtown area for access.
Impact ifnot executed:
It.Ck of complIance WIlh the Comp Plan.
Remarks
,I
Truck Route at US101 Intersection
Project #: TR17-99
,
Area Map
a ~ r--: a
0::
-<:{ (f) 0:::
z MADRONA 0 -1
<( I- -1
W Z ~
en .':)
0 LL.J
~ 0 GLEN WOOD z
~ ---l
<:( U
LL :::>
L.JJ
"'\
+
af.. YD.
"
"
J
~
--
~
q'
~
~
~
....:'<;(:
REVIEW:
Department Head
Date:
Planning Director
Date:
Finance Director:
Date:
City Engineer:
Date:
City Manager:
Date:
,
I
I
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Lincoln/Blvd Rechannelization and Signal
Project #: TR18-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project mvolves providmg for the rechannehzatlOn and Planning/Design: $32,000
signalization for the Lincoln Street an Lauridsen Blvd Land/Right-of-Way: $0
intersection. Construction' $421,000
Other: $0
Total: $453,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $362,400
RateslT axes: $90,600
Unknown: $0
Total: $453,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summan - CaoitaVNet OoeratinJ!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total I
$0 $0 $25,000 $32,000 $396,000 $0 $0 $453,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant TIB $362,400
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $90,600
Notes: l $453,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: Yes
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 21
Justification:
This project IS the third phase of the projects needed to provide for al alternate route for through traffic
to get to the harbor rather than going through the downtown area as is described in the Comprehensive
Plan.
Impact if not executed:
r.aCk of compliance WIth the Comp Plan.
, jemarb
I
I
r
v
Lincoln/Blvd Rechannelization and Signal
Project #: TR18-99
,
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Area Map
r-: AVE. r-:
U)
if)
>- ocre r--:
Q:: Z ,-..:
Q:: -1 (r) LOPEZ A
FOGARTY (J)
I U W
u FOREST z if) 0
-.l 0 WHIDBEY
C L MBUS <( '-
W
0....
V ASHON
PAR
,.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Street Bicycle Facilities/Racks/Striping
Project #: TR20-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves proVIding for bicycle events and Planning/Design: $0
modifications to the existing arterials to better accommodate Land/Right-of-Way: $0
their use by bicycles. Construction: $102,000
Other' $0
Total. $102,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/T axes: $102,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $102,000
SEPA Required No
Other Permits No
Yearlv Exoense Summar' - CaoitallNet OoeratinJ!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $2,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $102,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Taxes I General Fund - Street Fund $102,000
Notes: I $102,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 9
Justification:
The current arterial system, except for a few locations, does not provide for separate bicycle facilities
or provide for separate bicycle facilities or provide signage for bicycle routing. This project would
assist in improving the safety of bicyclists throughout the city by providing separate facilities, as
needed or bicycled routes signed throughout the city as well as events to promote use of bIcycles.
Impact ifnot executed:
raCk of bicycle facilities.
Remarks
I
I
I
J
Street Bicycle Facilities/Racks/Striping
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: TR20-99
,
,
,
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Lauridsen Blvd Reconstruction [Trk Rt. To 'L' St.]
Project #: TR21-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves reconstructing Lauridsen Blvd from the PlanninglDesign: $180,000
Truck Route to "L" Street. Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Construction: $1,620,000
Other: $0
Total: $1,800,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $360,000
Unknown: $1,440,000
Total: $1,800,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CapitaVNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $1,620,000 $0 $1,800,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Taxes General fund - Street Fund $360,000
Unknown Unfunded $1,440,000
Notes: I $1,800,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 29
Justification:
The eXIstmg roadway IS becoming too narrow to handle the traffic as the area grows. There are no
sidewalks for foot traffic and bicycles have difficulty with conflicts with vehicles.
Impact if not executed:
rontinUed use of the narrow roadway.
. IRemarb
I
I
J
Lauridsen Blvd Reconstruction [Trk Rt. To 'L' St.]
Project #: TR21-99
,
Area Map
~
~
"'.
E sr.
c HAZEL ....= ci
g a: U) ll:::'
~ t- MADRONA u
I- W Z
Cl: II> ::J
0 0
0- ~ 0
n::: a:: ::J
'<C Lt ()
;::)
w
'r'IW'< '0'"
;;
,
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
,
-
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
ADA Curb Ramps
Project #: TR26-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves mstalling curb ramps at various PlannrnglDeslgn: $0
intersectIOns. Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Construction: $100,000
Other; $0
Total: $100,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes; $100,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $100,000
SEPA Required No
Other Permits No
Yearlv Exoense Summar~ - CapitaVNet OoeratinI!
Prior Years I 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total I
$0 I $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $100,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Taxes TGeneral Fund - Street Fund $100,000
INotes: I $100,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: Yes
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 14
Justification:
ADA requires that sidewalks be usable by those confined to wheelchairs as well as others with
disabilities (i.e., visually impaired).
Impacti.fnotexecuted:
Crossing intersections, with sidewalks, will remain difficult for those with disabilities.
Remarks
4f1
J
ADA Curb Ramps
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: TR26-99
'-
,
,
,
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
8th Street Bridge Replacement Study
Project #: TR30-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
This project involves the initial stages of the replacement of PlannlnglDesign' $150,000
both 8th Street Bridges. Once load hmits and structural Land/Rlght-of-Way' $0
conditions reach the point of economics for replacement, this Construction $0
study should be conducted. Other: $0
Total: $150,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donabons/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $150,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $150,000
SEPA Required No
Other Permits No
Yearlv EXDense Summar - CaDitaVNet OperatinI!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Yr Const Comp: I -I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources I
Taxes IGeneral Fund - Street Fund $150,000
,Notes: I $150,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: Yes
Contract: No
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 15
Justification:
Replacement of the 8th Street Bridges will become a very important project when the structural rating
of the bridges must be reduced and load liffilts placed on the bridges. These bridges provide the major
east/west artenallink across town that is vital to all modes of transportation and especially emergency
services.
Impact ifnot executed:
Not conducting the study when the bridges reach the point of structural problems will eventually
impact the abihty to provide traffic service across town. If the structural ability of the bridges is not
addressed in a timely manner, the bridges would eventually have to be closed to traffic.
Remarks
,1
{
J
8th Street Bridge Replacement Study
Area Map
Project #: TR30-99
,.
,.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
CIty Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,.
I
I
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
9th Street Widening
Project #: TR32-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project mvolves widening 9th Street from Lincoln to Planning/Design: $2,000
Chase to accommodate increased traffic volume. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction- $48,000
Other: $0
Total: $50,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $50,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $50,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CaDitallNet Operatin/!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Taxes IGeneral Fund - Street Fund $50,000
Notes: T $50,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 35
Justification:
The existmg roadway is becoming too narrow to handle the traffic as the area grows. There are no
sidewalks for foot traffic and bicycles have difficulty with conflicts with vehicles.
Impact ifnot executed:
rontmued use of narrow roadway.
Remarks
,I
I
I
J
9th Street Widening
Project #: TR32-99
,
Area Map
I
~
,
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
,
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Peabody Street Reconstruction
Project #:
TR33-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project involves reconstructing Peabody Street from Front Planning/Design: $30,000
to 8th Streets. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction: $270,000
Other: $0
Total: $300,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $240,000
RateslT axes: $60,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $300,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CapitallNet OperatinJl
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Loan PWTF $240,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $60,000
Notes: I $300,000
Public Works Trust Funds (PWTF) have not been applied for.
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 11
Justification:
This roadway continues to see increased traffic volume as an alternate to Lincoln Street. Large traffic
volume is also generated from the County Courthouse and City Hall by employees and others doing
business at these facilities. The roadway between Second and Fourth Streets has structural failure and
needs to be completely reconstructed.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued increased maintenance, escalating costs for repairs and users of the roadway, and potential
for addItional accidents.
~ remarkS
j
Peabody Street Reconstruction
Area Map
Project #: TR33-99
,
'-
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engmeer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
,
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Laurel/Lauridsen Signal
Project #: TR35-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves adding a traffic signal at Laurel S1. and PlannlnglDeslgn: $25,000
Lauridsen Blvd. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction' $150,000
Other: $0
Total: $175,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $140,000
Rates/Taxes: $35,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $175,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CapitallNet Operatine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $150,000 $0 $175,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant HES $140,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $35,000
INotes: I $175,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: PublIc Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 34
Justification:
Heavy traffic at this intersection merit the addItion of a traffic signal to safely regulate traffic from
Laurel entering on Lauridsen.
Impact ifnot executed:
Icongested intersection.
~ IRem.r~
I
I
I
v
Laurel/Lauridsen Signal
Project #: TR35-99
,
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Area Map
i;
~.
~
~
~
~
:::>
--0
~.
^,,0~
.....:
if)
>-
Q::
0::
.....:
if) ORCA
2'
--I
OCK
FOGARTY
FOREST
I-
(f) LOPEZ A V~.
WHIDBEY AVE.
r-:
if)
w
V ASH ON
'-'
2:
:J
----
,
PARK AVE.
,.
,
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Ennis Street Guardrail
Project #: TR36-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS project involves installing a guard rail on the east slide of PlanmnglDesign: $10,000
Ennis Creek road going down to the Rayonier property. Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Construction: $56,000
Other: $0
Total: $66,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $53,000
RateslT axes: $13,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $66,000
SEPA RequITed Yes
Other PermIts No
Yearlv Expense Summar - CapitaVNet Operatin1!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,000 $66,000
Yr Const Comp:. r I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation Developer $53,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $13,000
Notes: I $66,000
I
I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Justification:
Steep slope without protection.
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 46
Impact ifnot executed:
IDoesn\ meet current safety standards.
. \Rema'b
I
I
j
Ennis Street Guardrail
Area Map
Project #: TR36-99
'-
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
I Lauridsen Blvd! Airport Road Realignment
,
~
Project #: TR40-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Transportation project involves the realignment of the Planning/Design: $477,000
existing Laundsen Blvd, Auport Road and Edgewood Drive Land/Right-of-Way: $610,000
area. It is a multi-agency grant project funded by the City, Port, Construction: $1,036,000
County and Transportation Board. Other: $0
Total: $2,123,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $384,150
Donations/Grants/Loans: $1,449,050
Ratesrraxes: $289,800
Unknown: $0
Total: $2,123,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CaoitallNet Ooeratin/!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$1,087,000 $1,036,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,123,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer Port of Port Angeles $192,075
Fund Transfer Clallam County $192,075
Grant FADS Grant from City Allocation $132,500
Grant TIB $1,316,550
Taxes City - STP Funds $289,800
Notes: I $2,123,000
City Priority:
2
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Pubhc Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 2
Justification:
This project is to improve the access to the airport from US101 and improve the intersectIOn of
Edgewood Drive and Airport Road which is a high accident intersection. There are binding
agreements between the agencies involved to share costs of this project. In the long term this project
will improve the economic stability of the airport by improvmg the access to the airport. The design
will address the ability to serve the future airport terminal location which will be west of the current
tenmnal.
Impact ifnot executed:
Project IS currently funded. If not funded the agreements with the Port, County and TIB Grant would
have to be closed and all grant funds paid back.
Remarks
Actual Expenses: 1997 - $12,000; 1998 - $235,000; 1999 - $335,000; 2000 - $185,000
J
Lauridsen Blvd/Airport Road Realignment
Project #: TR40-99
,
Area Map
~
E'OGEWOOD DR.
(AURID
SE"N 8
LVD.
+
ci
~
I-
0:::
o
0...
4:::
<(
c
c
'"'
<
I.J
Q
,
c::>
.r
>-
LU
u...
'r\'vt'< 10"
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
I Lauridsen Blvd Bridge Widening
Project #: TR42-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Transportation project involves widening the current Planning/Design: $250,000
bridge to allow the use of the bridge by trucks and buses. The Land/Right-of-Way: $0
project could Involve widening on the north and south sides of Construction: $2,570,000
the bridge. Other: $0
Total: $2,820,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $2,256,000
RateslTaxes: $564,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $2,820,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CaDitaVNet Operatine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $250,000 $2,000,000 $570,000 $0 $0 $2,820,000
Yr Const Comp: I I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
,
Funding Sources
Grant BRAC Grant $2,256,000
Taxes General Fund $564,000
Notes: I $2,820,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: Yes
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 16
Justification:
This project IS identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a necessary project to move trucks on an
alternative route to using streets in the downtown area. Currently trucks must go through downtown to
access the waterfront and Daishowa on the west SIde of the harbor. Widening this bridge would allow
use by trucks and buses. They can not use the bridge now due to inadequate turning width.
Impact ifnot executed:
Not complying with the Comprehensive Plan and reducing the level of service.
~ \Remark'
J
Lauridsen Blvd Bridge Widening
Project #: TR42-99
,
Area Map
Q
o WHIDBEY AVE.
~
w
ll..
PARK AVE.
i..A,{Jf?IDS€/V
B,- YD.
'-
HIGHLAND AVE.
GRANT AVE.
~
VJ
p:;
Itti
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
I
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Olympic Peninsula IntI Gateway
Project #:
TR48-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Transportation project involves designing and Planning/DesIgn: $158,000
constructing the selected alternative from the pre-design Land/Rlght-of-Way: $560,000
efforts. PortIOns of projects WT-27 and WT-28 (Downtown Construction: $4,000,000
Watermains & Sidewalks) are associated with this project and Other: . $0
qualify as matching funds. It should also be noted that Clallam Total: $4,718,000
Transit is the lead agency. Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $4,699,666
RateslTaxes: $18,333
Unknown: $0
Total: $4,717,999
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summar - CaoitallNet Ooeratine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$69,000 $89,000 $4,560,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,718,000
Yr Const Comp: r -I First Year of Operating Cost: 2000 Operating Cost Amount: $18,000
Funding Sources
DonatIOn Port & Transit Matching Funds $36,666
Donation Private Match $13,000
Grant TIB $1,590,000
Grant USFS $60,000
Grant FTA $3,000,000
Taxes General Fund Reserves $18,333
Notes: I $4,717,999
I
City Priority: ) Legal Mandate: No Concurrency: No Contract: Yes
I
Department: Publtc Works 8F Utilities Division: Street Cost Center:
Contact: Glenn Cutler/Tim Smith
Div. Priority: 5
Justification:
This project is to improve and enhance the economy of the Downtown and the City in general. It is a
match of public multi-agency and private partnerships to consolidate the transportation systems under
one roof in the downtown area. The intent is to combine transit, ferry ridership, vehicles, waterfront
trail users, buses, van tours, taxis and others into one coordinated transportation system using the
transportation center as the hub and catalyst.
Impact ifnot executed:
Delay in revitaltzing the downtown core and its emergence from a timber dependent economy.
Remarks
A ,..tl1.,l Pv....,...""',,. 1 OOQ _ <(:') 000. 1000 _ <(:~~ 000. ')000 - <(:~L1 000
J
Olympic Peninsula IntI Gateway
Area Map
Project #: TR48-99
,
'-
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
,
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
8th Street Reconstruction
Project #:
TR61-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Transportation project involves the reconstruction of 8th Planning/Design" $300,000
Street from Cherry Street to Race Street includmg removing Land/Right-of-Way: $0
the existing asphalt and overlaying the roadway and Construction: $2,200,000
modification of the traffic signal at 8th and Cherry. Other: $0
Total: $2,500,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $1,800,000
RateslTaxes: $700,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $2,500,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CaDitallNet Operatine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$1,500,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Loan PWTF $1,800,000
Taxes General Fund $700,000
[Notes: I $2,500,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 1
Justification:
ThIS Public Works project involves improving roadway conditions. The pavement has reached the end
of its life cycle and maintenance of the surface is costly and difficult due to the volume of traffic on
the roadway. This arterial is a critical link between the east and west sections ofthe city and
maintenance of a good roadway surface enhances the economics of using the roadway. The roadway
has been overlayed a number of times resulting in a high roadway crown and little or no gutters. This
causes poor dramage control and extra maintenance. In addition, the pavement surface has developed
wheel rutting due to heavy wear of the surface. This wheel rutting is a place for water to accumulate
Impact if not executed:
Continued increased maintenance, escalated costs for final repalf, increased costs for users of the
roadway due to roadway roughness and potential for additional accidents. If not funded the current
signal will continue to provide service for the intersection, but at a lower service level. As traffic
. .
. rmaTb
",I
8th Street Reconstruction
Project #: TR61-99
Area Map
,.
~ ~ ...: ~ . ~ ~ ~ : ~
~ U1 \I) VI VI ~
i ~ ... ~ ~ IIJ ... -~ 1
~ :z ~
8 :0= ~
:I: :z Ii
u ::J ~
~
81H ST.
t
! - -
,
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
I
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Rhoads Road Area LID
Project #:
TR69-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This TransportatiOn project involves constructing roadway and Planning/Design: $84,000
drainage systems m an area that is expenencing drainage Land/Right-of-Way: $0
problems and has narrow roadways. LID-no cost to city if Construction' $756,000
property owners approve LID. Other: $0
Total: $840,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $840,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $840,000
SEPA ReqUired Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Yearlv Expense Summarv - CapitallNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $840,000 $840,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer ILID Construction Fund $840,000
Notes: -1 $840,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 48
Justification:
This area has narrow roadways and a problem plagued drainage system of ditches and culverts. The
project would improve both of these situations.
Impact ifnot executed:
Lack of adequate urban facilities.
Remarks
[
)
v
Rhoads Road Area LID
Project #: TR69-99
,.
Area Map
-l
W
Ct:'
:J
<(
--'
~
en
>-
a
o
0)
<(
w
Q
I~
{
~~
~
<<
I
AHL VERS RD.
(j)
--1
--1
::r:
-
(
w c
FE ~
0 RHODES RD.
lY
-1
---1
~ '-
0
-l
0
S
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
,
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Mt Angeles Road/Porter Street LID
Project #: TR70-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Transportation project involves the constructIOn of Planning/DesIgn: $200,000
roadways, storm dramage and other utIlities. LID-no cost to Land/Right-of-Way: $0
city ifproperty owners approve LID. Construction: $1,800,000
Other: $0
Total: $2,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $2,000,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $2,000,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summan - CaoitallNet Ooeratin!!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer lLID Construction Fund $2,000,000
Notes: I $2,000,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 39
Justification:
This area has narrow roadways - some of which are paved with BST surfacing which is difficult or
impossible to maintain. The area has a ditch and culvert drainage system that experience problems.
Impact ifnot executed:
ILaCk of adequate urban facilities.
Remarks
~I
I
I
Mt Angeles Road/Porter Street LID
Project #: TR70-99
,
Area Map
-HOBEY AVE.
~
-I '-~ '" VL-.
PARK AVE.
(A U F?/D
S~N n
dL. VD.
RD. t--:
U)
(J) --1
--1
-..l <{
5: ~
""""'
HIGHLAND AVE.
~
U)
I-
Z
W
(!J
w
a:::::
~
~
~
{(
OL YMPIJS AVE.
CRAIG AVE.
~
,
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
,
-
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
lOth/13th and "I"/"M" Street LID
Project #: TR71-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Transportation project involves providing utilities, storm Planning/Design: $120,000
drainage and roadway improvements by LID. LID-no cost to Land/Right-of-Way: $0
city if property owners approve LID. Construction: $1,080,000
Other: $0
Total: $1,200,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $1,200,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $1,200,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summarv - CapitaVNet Opera tin/!
Prior Years I 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $1,080,000 $1,200,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer ILID Construction Fund $1,200,000
Notes: I $1,200,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 40
Justification:
This project would provide urban facilities to an area wIth gravel roadways and a limited drainage
system.
Impact ifnot executed:
[LaCk of "rboo facilities.
Remarks
#1
I
I
J
10th/13th and "I"/"M" Street LID
Project #: TR71-99
Area Map
..........
)
~
.1
*1-; .C'.
I~
f......
REVIEW:
Department Head' Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,.
,.
,.
I
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Sidewalk Program
Project #: TR74-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
This Transportation project involves constructing new PlanninglDesign: $0
sidewalks on arterials with priority given to school walking Land/Right-of-Way. $0
routes. Part of the program provides for a local grant to Construction: $350,000
property owners to construct sidewalks adjacent to their Other: $0
property based on a priority system. The basic program will Total: $350,000
involve sidewalks on one side of the arterial. 1998 - Sidewalk Estimated Project Funding
in the Franklin School area, 1999 - 2003 - Undetermined. Fund Transfer: $350,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $350,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summary - CapitallNet Opera tin!!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $60,000 $65,000 $70,000 $75,000 $80,000 $350,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer IGeneral Fund - Street Vacation proceeds $350,000
Notes: I $350,000
I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 8
Justification:
Many of our arterials do not have sidewalks on them. This project will construct sidewalks on arterials
with prionty given to areas by schools and other high pedestrian traffic areas. Construction of
sidewalks is a hIgh prionty of the City Council. The 1996 program will consist of sidewalks around
the High School completing a walking loop incorporating new sidewalks that are bemg constructed by
Albertson's and the new library on Boulevard. During 1996 we would also continue the city grant
program for other locations on a priority based system. During other years the program will be better
defined after the CIty-Wide Transportation Plan is completed.
Impact i.fnot executed:
ro additiooal sujewalks. I
Remarks
Design and constructIOn to be coordinated with project PK 16. THIS PROJECT IS BEING MOVED
TO SIDEWALK GRANT PROJECTS - SEE INDIVIDUAL SIDEWALK PROJECTS.
J
Sidewalk Program
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: TR74-99
,.
,.
,.
tI Remarks
I
,
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Lauridsen Blvd/W ashington Street Reconstruct
Project #:
TR80-99
r Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This TransportatIOn project involves reconstructing the PlanninglDesign: $40,000
intersection of Blvd and Washmgton Street to improve the Land/Right-of-Way; $0
access to the arterial and reduce the grades of Washington Construction: $210,000
Street as it intersects Blvd. Other: $0
Total: $250,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $200,000
RateslT axes: $50,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $250,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summar'l' - CaoitallNet Ooeratine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $40,000 $210,000 $0 $0 $250,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation Port Angeles School District $50,000
Grant Till - PSMP, AIP $150,000
Taxes General Fund $50,000
Notes: I $250,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 20
Justification:
The intersection of Blvd and Washington Streets next to Franklin Elementary School is not adequate
to address the increasing traffic. In addition, the grade of Washington as it intersects Blvd is steep and
during the winter it is difficult for cars and buses to stop at the intersection. The intersection has
additional conflicts on the north side due to a triangular shaped property that divides the two streets.
These streets will need to be redesigned to provide perpendicular intersections ehminating the angled
access.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued congestion in the area and difficult intersectIon access.
J
Lauridsen Blvd/Washington Street Reconstruct
Project #: TR80-99
,
Area Map
\A8US
~
Vl
W
Vl
::t:
<.)
~ VIEWCREST AVE.
Vl
-'
w
Q:
::>
<;(
--l
o
o 'M-IIDBEY AVE.
-<(
w
~
(I)
>-
Q
o
co
<:
w
D..
AHI V~~<::: 01"\
P ARK AVE.
......
(J1
I-
<::
w
~
W
D:
LAU'?IDSEIV
8LYD.
HIGHLAND AVE.
GRANT A \IE.
,
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,.
,
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
"e" Street and Fairmont LID
Project #:
TR97 -99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS Transportation project involves providmg storm dramage, Planning/Design: $230,000
roadways, sidewalks and utilitIes in an undeveloped area of the Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
city. LID-no cost to city if property owners approve LID. Construction: $2,070,000
Other: $0
Total: $2,300,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $2,300,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $2,300,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CapitallNet OperatinJ!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $230,000 $2,070,000 $2,300,000
Yr Const Comp: I I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer U\LID Construction Fund $2,300,000
Notes: 1 $2,300,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Pubhc Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 41
Justification:
This area of the city does not have improved roadways or a storm drainage system. In order to respond
to requests by some property owners in the area an LID would have to occur to provide the necessary
improvements.
Impact ifnot executed:
Lack of improvements to the area and possibihty of restricting growth to the area.
Remarks
.1
,
'J
"e" Street and Fairmont LID
Project #: TR97-99
,
Area Map
U?,
Cl
a::
I-
:r
:)
:l.
l::
::(
ci
a:
:z
<(
w
OJ
'rIW'< 10'
,
+
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
I
I
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Front Street Sidewalk
Project #:
TROI-OO
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS project involves lTIstalling curb, gutter, sidewalk and Planning/Design: $24,000
drainage along Front Street from Golf Course Rd. west to Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Enms Street. Construction: $189,000
Other: $0
Total: $213,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $173,000
RateslTaxes: $40,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $213,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summarv - CapitallNet Opera tin/{
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $24,000 $189,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $213,000
Yr Const Comp: r 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant TEA-21 Enhancement $173,000
Taxes General Fund - Engineering match $15,000
Taxes General Fund - Parks Tree funds $25,000
, I $213,000
'Notes: I
The CIty did receive approval of$173,000 (TEA-21) grant money.
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: PublIc Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 4
Justification:
Front Street, which is a principal arterial, does not have any SIdewalk and very little curb and gutter
between Golf Course Rd. and Ennis St. The WSDOT has recently installed curb, gutter and sidewalk
from Golf Course Rd. to the east. This project will construct curb, gutter and sidewalks on Front
Street whIch will fill a gap from Golf Course Rd. to Ennis St. Construction of sidewalks is a high
pnonty of the City Council. This project is supported by the non-motorized committee.
Impact ifnot executed:
No additIOnal sidewalks and this area will continue to be difficult to walk.
Remarks
Design to be done lTI house and construction by contract.
'J
Front Street Sidewalk
Project #: TROI-OO
,
Area Map
'-
JT1 CHESTNUT ST.
z
z
(j) ~
U) r-:
:::l I-
Z (f) (t:
I- W
(f) U J:
W W ()
:r: w 0:::
0 m =>
0
en
.....
,.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
'-
I
I
~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
First Street Sidewalk
Project #:
TR02-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project involves mstalling curb, gutter, sidewalk and PlanmnglDesign: $30,000
drainage along First Street from Liberty Street east to Golf Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Course Rd. Construction: $170,000
Other: $0
Total' $200,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $150,000
RateslTaxes: $50,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $200,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summarv - CaoitallNet Ooeratin1!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $30,000 $170,000 $0 $0 $200,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant TID - PSMP $150,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $50,000
Notes: I $200,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 24
Justification:
FITst Street, which is a pnncipal arterial, does not have any SIdewalk between Liberty Street and Golf
Course Rd. The WSDOT has recently installed sidewalks on SRIOl from Golf Course Rd. to the
east. This project will construct sidewalk on First Street which will fin in a gap from Liberty Street to
Golf Course Rd.
Impact if not executed:
No addItional sidewalks and this area will continue to be difficult to walk.
Remarks
Design to be done III house and construction by contract.
I
I
V
First Street Sidewalk
Project #: TR02-00
\
Area Map
ITl
2
z
(J) .....=
t.n .....:
:::l t.n cc:
~ w
0) (.) ::t:
w Lu U
:J: 4..J Ir
(.} QJ :J
0
lD
LAUI?IOSEN
8LVD
w
(/)
ct::
:)
o
U
l.L..
-'
o
'9
,
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planmng Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,.
,
,
~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
'I' Street Sidewalk
Project #:
TR03-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project involves the completIOn of constructing sidewalk Planning/Design: $25,000
on'!' Street from 13th Street to 18th Street. The project WIll Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
involve Installing curb, gutter, sidewalk and drainage. Construction: $125,000
Other: $0
Total: $150,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $110,000
RateslTaxes: $40,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $150,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar' - CapitaVNet Operatin/l
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $25,000 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation School District $25,000
Grant TIB - PSMP $85,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $40,000
Notes: I $150,000
TIB (TransportatIOn Improvement Board); PSMP (PedestrIan Safety Mobility Program)
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & UtIlities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 12
Justification:
This project will complete construction of SIdewalks on an arterial which is designated a school
walking route. The construction of sidewalks on school walkmg routes is a high priority of the City
Council.
Impact ifnot executed:
No addItional sidewalks and this area will continue to be difficult to walk.
Remarks
Design to be performed in house and due to the value of the project the construction will be done by
contract.
,}
'I' Street Sidewalk
Area Map
Project #: TR03-00
,
'-
,
(-4Uf?IDS~N
S( YD.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
I
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Lauridsen Blvd. Sidewalk [Jones to Liberty]
Project #:
TR04-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves constructing new curb, gutter, sidewalk Planning/Design: $15,000
and drainage on Laundsen Blvd. From Jones Street to Liberty Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Street. This project WIll fill gaps between existing sidewalks. Construction: $85,000
Other: $0
Total: $100,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $80,000
RateslTaxes: $20,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $100,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Yearlv EXDense Summar - Cavita/INet Overating
Prior Years 2001 I 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $15,000 $85,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Yr Const Comp: T 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant TIB - PSMP $80,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $20,000
Notes: I $100,000
I
TIB (Transportation Improvement Board); PSMP (Pedestrian Safety Mobility Program)
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 13
Justification:
ThIS project will construct curb, gutter and sidewalks and fill sidewalk gaps on an arterial which is
designated a school walkmg route. The constructIOn of sidewalks on school walking routes is a high
priority of the City Council.
Impact if not executed:
No additional sidewalks and thIS area will continue to be difficult to walk.
Remarks
DeSIgn to be performed in house and due to the value of the project the construction will be done by
contract.
J
Lauridsen Blvd. Sidewalk [Jones to Liberty] Project #: TR04-00
Area Map ,
'-AURID ,
StN
SL YD.
HIGHLAND AVE.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Lauridsen Blvd S/W [Vine to Francis]
Project #:
TR05-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves constructing new sidewalk and drainage Planning/Design: $15,000
on Lauridsen Blvd. from Vine Street to FranCIS Street. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction: $85,000
Other. $0
Total. $100,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $80,000
Rates/Taxes: $20,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $100,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summary - Capita/INet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 I 2005 2006 Total
$0 l $0 $0 $15,000 $85,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Yr Const Comp: T 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant Till - PSMP $80,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $20,000
Notes: 1 $100,000
I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 19
Justification:
Many of our artenals do not have sidewalks on them. ThIs project will construct a sidewalk on an
arterial which IS designated a school walking route. Construction of sidewalks is a high priority ofthe
City Council.
Impact~notexecuted:
No addItional sidewalks and this area will contmue to be difficult to walk.
Remarks
Design to be done m house and construction by contract.
;
J
Lauridsen Blvd S/W [Vine to Francis]
Project #: TROS-OO
,
Area Map
a
o WHIDBEY AVE.
<;(
w
a..
PARK AVE.
L~U R1DStN
81..vD.
t.
~P^^JT "",....
HIGHLAND AVE.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
I
I
-
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Park Ave. S/W [Race. To Liberty]
Project #:
TR07-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThlS project involves constructmg new curb, gutter, sldewalk Planning/Design: $50,000
and drainage on Park Ave. from Washington Blvd. to Liberty Land/Rlght-of-Way. $0
Street and Liberty Street from Park Ave. to Lauridsen Blvd. Construction: $350,000
Other: $0
Total: $400,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $200,000
RateslTaxes: $200,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $400,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summan~ - CapitallNet Operatinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 I 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $350,000 $0 $400,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation School District $25,000
Grant TIB - PSMP, TPP or AIP $175,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $200,000
Notes: I $400,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 31
Justification:
Many of our arterials do not have sidewalks on them. Thls project wlll construct a sidewalk on an
arterial which is designated a school walking route. Construction of sidewalks is a high priority of the
City Council.
Impact if not executed:
No additional sidewalks and thIS area will continue to be difficult to walk.
Remarks
Design to be done in house and construction by contract.
J
Park Ave. S/W [Race. To Liberty]
Project #: TR07-00
,
Area Map
WHIDBEY AVE.
PARK AVE.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
~i
HI GHLAND AVE.
GRAN T AVE.
PENINSULA
COLLEGE
,
'-
I
I
~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
5th/Race St. Signal/Overlay
Project #:
TR08-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves reconstructing 5th Street between Francis Planning/Design: $15,000
and Race Streets, and installing a traffic signal at Race Street. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction: $171,000
Other' $0
Total: $186,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $167,400
RateslTaxes: $18,600
Unknown: $0
Total: $186,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summar - CaoitallNet Ooeratinf,!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $15,000 $171,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $186,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant Hazard Elimination System (HES) $167,400
Taxes General Fund - In-house Engmeering $18,600
Notes: I $186,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Pubhc Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 6
Justification:
The project is needed to improve the roadway pavement condItions and improve the traffic flows
through the intersection at 5th and Race Streets. The section between Francis and Race Streets need to
be widened to provide adequate room for a left turn lane.
Impact ifnot executed:
If the project is not funded, roadway mamtenance will increase and traffic accidents at the intersection
will mcrease.
Remarks
This project has been awarded fundmg with a HES grant by the WSDOT.
I
\I
5th/Race St. Signal/Overlay
Project #: TR08-00
,
Area Map
"
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
I
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
16th Street S/W ['I' St. to 'F' St.]
Project #:
TR09-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves constructmg new curb, gutter, SIdewalk PlanninglDesign: $40,000
and drainage on 16th Street from 'I' Street to 'F' Street.. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction: $210,000
Other: $0
Total: $250,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $175,000
RateslTaxes: $75,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $250,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summarv - CaoitallNet Ooeratine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $40,000 $210,000 $0 $0 $250,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation School Distnct $25,000
Grant TIB - PSMP $150,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $75,000
I $250,000
Notes: I
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 23
Justification:
Many of our arterials do not have sidewalks on them. ThIS project WIll construct a sidewalk on an
arterial WhICh is designated a school walking route. Construction of sidewalks is a high priority of the
City Council.
Impact ifnot executed:
No additional sidewalks and thIS area will continue to be difficult to walk.
Remarks
Design to be done in house and construction by contract.
j
16th Street S/W ['I' St. to 'F' St.]
Area Map
Project #: TR09-00
,
;;
~
i
L.AURIDSEN
8L. YD.
'-
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
--.
,
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
16th Street S/W ['F' St. to Stevens School]
Project #:
TR10-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project mvolves constructing new curb, gutter, sidewalk PlanninglDeslgn: $30,000
and drainage on 16th Street from 'F' Street to Stevens School. LandfRight-of-Way: $0
Construction: $200,000
Other: $0
Total: $230,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
DonationsfGrants/Loans: $175,000
RateslTaxes: $55,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $230,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summar - Caoital/Net Ooeratinf!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $200,000 $0 $230,000
Yr Const Comp: r 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: SO
Funding Sources
Donation School District $25,000
Grant TIB - PSMP $150,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $55,000
INotes: I $230,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 28
Justification:
Many of our arterials do not have SIdewalks on them. ThIS project will construct a sidewalk on an
artenal which is designated a school walking route. Construction of sidewalks is a high priority of the
CIty Council.
Impact if not executed:
No addItional sidewalks and thIS area WIll contmue to be difficult to walk.
Remarks
DeSIgn to be done in house and constructIOn by contract
16th Street S/W ['F' St. to Stevens School]
Project #: TRIO-OO
,.
Area Map
Sr
"""-'
,
:rv 8L liD,
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
I
I
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
10th Street S/W ['N' Street to 'M' Street]
Project #:
TRll-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project mvolves constructmg new curb, gutter, sidewalk PlanmnglDeslgn: $40,000
and drainage on 10th Street from 'N' Street to 'M' Street. Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Construction: $335,000
Other' $0
Total: $375,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $175,000
Ratesrr axes: $200,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $375,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summar~ - CapitallNet Operatine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 I Total
$0 $0 $0 $40,000 $335,000 $0 $0 r $375,000
Yr Const Comp: r 0 I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation School District $25,000
Grant TIB - PSMP $150,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $200,000
Notes: I $375,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: PublIc Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
,Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 25
Justification:
Many of our arterials do not have sidewalks on them. This project WIll construct a sidewalk on an
arterial whIch IS designated a school walking route. Construction of sidewalks is a high priority of the
City CouncIl.
Impact ifnot executed:
No addItional SIdewalks and thIS area will continue to be dIfficult to walk.
Remarks
DeSIgn to be done m house and constructIOn by contract
I
\ j
10th Street S/W ['N' Street to 'M' Street]
Project #: TRII-00
Area Map
,
D\{'
/.-.......
CJ
b
~
b
lO~
IZ; s}'
'It
f'f/
~<;l/N
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
'-
I
,
~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
10th Street ['M' Street to 'I' Street]
Project #:
TR12-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves constructing new curb, gutter, sidewalk Planning/Design: $40,000
and drainage on 10th Street from 'M' Street to 'I' Street. Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Construction: $335,000
Other: $0
Total: $375,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $175,000
RateslTaxes: $200,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $375,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Yearlv EXDense Summar - CapitallNet Operatin1!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $40,000 $335,000 $0 $0 $375,000
Yr Const Comp: r 0 I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
I Funding Sources
Donation School District $25,000
Grant Till - PSMP $150,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $200,000
Notes: I $375,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 26
Justification:
Many of our arterials do not have sidewalks on them. This project will construct a sidewalk on an
arterial which is designated a school walking route. ConstructIOn of sidewalks is a high priority of the
City Council.
Impact ifnot executed:
No additional sidewalks and this area will continue to be difficult to walk.
Remarks
DesIgn to be done in house and construction by contract
J
10th Street ['M' Street to 'I' Street]
Project #: TR12-00
,
Area Map
')
+
"
Sl'
".
,
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
I
,
~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
'N' Street S/W [14th St. to 18th St.]
Project #: TR13-00
Project Description I Estimated,Project Costs
This project involves constructmg new curb, gutter, sIdewalk Planmng/Design: $40,000
and drainage on 'N' Street from 14th Street to 18th Street. Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Construction: $210,000
Other: $0
Total: $250,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $175,000
RateslTaxes: $75,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $250,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv EXDense Summar' - CapitallNet Opera tine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $210,000 $250,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation School District $25,000
Grant TIB - PSMP $150,000
Taxes General Fund - Street Fund $75,000
Notes: I $250,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & UtIlities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 37
Justification:
Many of our arterials do not have sidewalks on them. This project will construct a sidewalk on an
arterial which is desIgnated a school walking route. Construction of sidewalks is a high priority of the I
City Council.
Impact ifnot executed:
No additional sidewalks and this area will continue to be dIfficult to walk.
Remarks
Design to be done m house and construction by contract
J
'N' Street S/W [14th St. to 18th St.]
Project #: TR13-00
,
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning DIrector Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Area Map
~.
o
<:)
~
&:
€?
~
===------
+
A...
C>
t!J
q
I.iJ
'-
'-
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Airport Industrial Park Streets
Project #:
TR14-00
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
ThIS project involves the mstallation of roadways, storm PlannlnglDesign. $200,000
drainage, curb, gutter and sIdewalks m the Port's proposed new Land/Right-of-Way: $0
industrial park south of the aIrport. Construction: $1,800,000
Other: $0
Total: $2,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $2,000,000
Rates/Taxes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $2,000,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summan - CapitallNet Operatin/(
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $565,000 $868,000 $567,000 $0 $2,000,000
Yr Const Comp: r 0 I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation IFunding by Port or others $2,000,000
Notes: T $2,000,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 18
Justification:
The Port is proposing to develop a new mdustrial park south of the airport which will require city
streets. The cost estimates provided here are based on the July 2000 study provided by Reid
Middleton. It is assumed at this time the Port or others will provide all necessary funding.
Impact i.fnot executed:
Access in and around the new industrial park would be unavailable.
Remarks
I
, f
Airport Industrial Park Streets
Project #:
TR14-00
Area Map
,.
~'s:..
- . ~~~~~.
~ .~~\ "r"~:' '. - ",,:.:r ':,.
__ "\_.._ ,..2tI:~ .-..... _ '- . ...
..... :\ -1' .~::-:."~1'<;~ J: '\ ....j "-".e.-.,_
- - J -..;.......;/0.. :1~ "- f'. ,.
~,. _' :-. ...:-.~ T .....,.-:: :::.. \. ~
/' ,;ii:' !.'t-t:!;"::4 "">~'J': - . I~ \t";'<Ipq-.H.':t _: ,_
r " ".If,!,:t - .'- -::- ~-=-:'.:.::~~~~.:-.:
'-
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
,
,
~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
8th Street Bridge Replacement
Project #:
TROI-Ol
Jlrojectl>escr~tion I Estimated Jlroject Costs
The project mvolves the actual replacement of both 8th Street Planning/Design: $1,000,000
Bridges. This past years bndge mspection has mdicated some Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
major work to the end caps must be done and is beginmng to Construction: $14,500,000
reach load hmIts. Other: $0
Total: $15,500,000
Estimated Jlroject Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $12,400,000
RatesfTaxes: $3,100,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $15,500,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv EXDense Summar~ - CapitallNet OperatinJl
Prior Years 2001 12002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 I $0 $1,000,000 $14,500,000 $0 $0 $15,500,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Grant Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee (BRAe) $12,400,000
Taxes General Fund - Street $3,100,000
Notes: -I $15,500,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 17
Justification:
Replacement of the 8th Street Bridges will become a very important project when the structural rating
of the bridges must be reduced and load hmIts placed on the bridges. These bridges provide the major
east/west artenallink across town that is vital to all modes of transportatIOn and especially emergency
servIces.
Impact ifnot executed:
The structural abIlity of the bndges could reach a point that would require the closure, of the bridges,
to traffic.
Remarks
I
I
J/
8th Street Bridge Replacement
Area Map
Project #: TROI-Ol
-
~
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
,
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Ennis St. Slide Repair
Project #:
TR02-01
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS project involves mstalling a retaming wall to stabIlize the PlannlnglDeslgn: $15,000
bank and open the roadway to two lanes. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction: $50,000
Other: $0
Total: $65,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $56,700
RateslTaxes: $8,300
Unknown: $0
Total: $65,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summar - CapitallNet OperatinJ!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $15,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000
Yr Const Comp: r 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources I
Grant Grant FEMA $56,700
Taxes General Fund $8,300
!Notes: I $65,000
This project has been approved for a Federal Emergency Management Grant
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 10
Justification:
IHeavy rams over the last weekend in January 1999 caused slope instabihty to the roadway. The east
side of the roadway was undermined and the slope fatled. The east lane was closed to traffic and only
one lane traffic is allowed.
Impact ifnot executed:
Roadway would remam open to one lane traffic and bank would remain unstable.
Remarks
I
J
Ennis St. Slide Repair
Project #: TR02-01
~
Area Map
r"7"J
Z
Z
CI)
r-:
lfJ
:J
Z
I-
U)
W
:c
()
,
~
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engmeer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
tit
I
,
~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Paving/Chip Seal Program
Project #:
TR03-01
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project Involves an annual overlays and chip seal of PlanninglDesign: $0
streets and alleys to extend the life and eliminate potholes and Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
other road hazards. Construction: $1,500,000
Other: $0
Total: $1,500,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $1,500,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $1,500,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar: - CapitallNet Operatine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,500,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Taxes IGeneral Funds $1,500,000
Notes: I $1,500,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: PublIc Works & Utilities Division: Street
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 3
Justification:
ThIs program IS part of a systematic approach to maintain and renew the street system and to eliminate
costly repairs. The CIty has in-place a pavement management system (PMS) which has identified
which streets have gone beyond their life expectancy.
Impact ifnot executed:
If the streets are not overlayed or ChIP sealed, the roadways will continue to deteriorate, potholes will
occur more frequently and the repairs will be come more costly. Roadways will become unsafe to
travel and the response times for emergency vehicles will be affected.
Remarks
IF"r 2001 STP funds will be used.
j
'I
Paving/Chip Seal Program
Project #: TR03-01
,
Area Map
SEE 5 YEAR
PAVEMENT
PROGRAM
MAP
,
REVIEW:
Department Head:
Planning Director
Date:
Date:
--------~--~- -------------
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.--~---------- ----------- -------------------------
,.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Golf Course Road Water PRY's
Project #: WTOI-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project involves installIng two additional pressure relief valves Planmng/Design: $0
(PRV's) to reduce high pressures in the lower portion ofthe Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Golf Course Road subzone. Construction: $110,000
Other: $0
Total: $110,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $110,000
Rates/Taxes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $110,000
Year'v Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operatinf(
Prior Years I 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $110,000 $0 $0 $110,000
Yr Const Comp: I I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation I Developer $110,000
Notes: I $110,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
SEPA Required No
Other PermIts No
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 14
Justification:
The water service in the Golf Course Road area will need to have the pressure zones adjusted to
improve service and allow for development of Del Guzzi Drive properties.
Impact~notexecuted:
Development of Del Guzzi property could be delayed.
Remarks
This project has been identified in the Water Comprehensive Plan as D-l1.
.
J
Golf Course Road Water PRY's
Area Map
.
o
a:::
w
U)
cr
:)
o
U
l...L..
~
o
C>
MELODY LN.
Project #: WTOl-99
.
.
LINDBERG RD.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Project #: WT02-99
. Concrete cylinder Pipe Replacement
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project mvolves the replacement, or relIning with smaller Planning/Design: $75,000
diameter pipe, or approxImately 26,000 feet of concrete Land/Right-of-Way: $0
cylinder pipe, Construction: $1,925,000
Other: $0
Total: $2,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/T axes: $2,000,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $2,000,000
Yearlv Expense Summar~ - CapitallNet OperatinJ!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $75,000 $425,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $0 $2,000,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates IWater Rates $2,000,000
Notes: I $2,000,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
SEPA Required
No
Other PermIts
No
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 5
Justification:
The majority of the main transmission hnes that the CIty had for water from the Morse Creek System
were constructed from concrete cylinder pipe. These pipelines are now used to tie many of our
reservoirs to the distribution system and over the last few years we have experienced a number of
failures to the pipebnes structural integrity resulting in major costs to the utility for repairs.
Impact if not executed:
Very significant risk of costly repalfs to the pipehnes and loss of service to our customers. There will
continue to be a number of failures in the system.
Remarks
This project has been identified in the Water Comprehensive Plan as D-l.
.
J
Concrete Cylinder Pipe Replacement
Area Map
Project #: WT02-99
.
I
.
-.a
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Inter-Tie of High Service Area
Project #: WT03-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project involves providing a another connectIOn m the high Planning/Design: $115,000
zone across Peabody Creek from near the existing Mill Creek Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
reservoir to near the McDougal subzone. Construction: $655,000
Other: $0
Total: $770,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/Taxes: $770,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $770,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Sum man _ CapitallNet OperatinJ!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $115,000 $85,000 $570,000 $0 $0 $0 $770,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources 1
Rates lWater Rates $770,000
Notes: I $770,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: Yes
Contract: Yes
Cost Center:
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Div. Priority: 6
Justification:
The southeastern portion of the city does not have a looped water system to provide reliable pressures
and flows, especially during any problems that may occur in the system. This pipeline would assist in
looping the system to provide greater reliability.
Impact ifnot executed:
The project is an important component in improving reliability of service in the high zone.
Remarks
This project has been identified in the Water Comprehensive Plan as D-4.
J
Inter-Tie of High Service Area
Area Map
~ Vl(WC~EST A'vE.
lJ)
g
:=)
-<
....
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
...:
l/)
>-
c
o
OJ
-<
w
Q..
AHLVf',t{S RO.
g RHOOES RD.
;j
.;i
~
--1i
PARK AVE.
!i
I-
2
UJ
(!)
w
a::
Project #: WT03-99
.
PaiL~HkA
~
-'
:z:
w
~
SC ER RD.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
.
Annual Replacements
Project #: WT12-99
Project Description r Estimated Project Costs
This Water project involves replacing old water lines that are Planning/Design: $0
in bad condition. Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Construction: $975,000
Other: $0
Total: $975,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $975,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $975,000
Yearlv Expense Summar _ CavitaI/Net Ooeratinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $150,000 $]55,000 $160,000 $165,000 $170,000 $175,000 $975,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates IWater Rates $975,000
Notes: 1 $975,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: N~
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 1
Justification:
The annual water main replacement program is part of a systematic approach to maintain and renew
the water system and to eliminate costly water leaks from the system. Specific location for
replacement are not identified because the intent is that the replacemetn program be flexible to meet
the system's most pressing need.
Impact ifnot executed:
If the water lines are not replaced there will continue to be more water line breaks which could result
in costly repairs and loss of service to the customers.
Remarks
This project has been identified in the Water Comprehensive Plan as D-3.
.
J
Annual Replacements
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: WT12-99
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Project #: WT30-99
. Downtown Watermains/Sidewalks Phase III
.
.
. I
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
Project mvolves the replacement of old watermams in the Planning/Design: $100,000
downtown area. During the watermain replacement the Land/Right-of-Way: $0
sidewalks will also be replaced since the mains are generally Construction: $1,900,000
beneath the sidewalks. Other: $0
Total: $2,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $1,500,000
RateslT axes: $500.000
Unknown: $0
Total: $2,000,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summan - Caoital/Net OoeratinJ!
Prior Years 2001 1 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $100,000 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Yr Canst Camp: I 1 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Loan PWTF $1,500,000
Rates Waterrates $500,000
Notes: I $2,000,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 11
Justification:
This project is the final phase ofa three (3) phase plan to replace a large portion of the old watermains
in the downtown area. This project will lead to lower maintenance expenses and improved fire flow
capacity in the downtown area. Approval of these funds will allow additional the final phase of
watermains to be replaced.
Impact if not executed:
Lack of proceeding with the project will ultimately result in watermain failures in the downtown area
with resultant property damage and temporary loss of service. In addition, emergency repairs are more
costly than planned repairs. Could delay further development of downtown.
Remarks
[
I
J
Downtown Watermains/Sidewalks Phase III
Project #: WT30-99
Area Map
.
/
-', ,--")
....\"......l \
--,
'.....-........~I/.'
,I
"
J........'
</;
0'
'V
~
~
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Peabody St. Reservoir Cover
Project #: WT31-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs I
Project involves constructing a cover over the Peabody Street Planning/Design: $45,000
Reservoir to protect the water supply from contamination. Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Construction: $360,000
Other: $0
Total: $405,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $360,000
RateslT axes: $45,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $405,000
Yearlv Expense SummarlJ - CapitaVNet Operatine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $45,000 $360,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $405,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: SO
Funding Sources
Loan Public Works Trust Fund $360,000
Rates Water Rates $45,000
Notes: -I $405,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: Yes
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 4
Justification:
The construction of a cover over all reservoirs is recommended by the Washington State Department
of Health to eliminate potential risks of contamination of the water supply and improve the water
quality. Installation of the roofs will also reduce the amount of disinfection necessary at the reservoirs.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued exposure of potential contannnation risks and would be in violation of Washington
Department of Health compliance agreement.
.
Remarks
This project has been identified in the Water Comprehensive Plan as S-l.
J
Peabody St. Reservoir Cover
Area Map
Project #: WT31-99
,.
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Corrosion Control Facility
Project #: WT32-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
Project involves constructing a water treatment facIlIty to Planning/Design: $80,000
adjust the ph of water so as to reduce the copper content ofthe Land/Right-of-Way: $0
water and reduce its corrosiveness. Construction: $300,000
Other: $0
Total: $380,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer. $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: '$0
RateslTaxes: $380,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $380,000
Yearly Expense SummaTj~ - CapitallNet Opera tin/!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $380,000 $0 $0 $380,000
Yr Const Comp: 1 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates IWater Rates $380,000
Notes: 1 $380,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 16
Justification:
We are required by the Washington State Department of Health to bring copper levels within standards
and reduce the corrosiveness of the existing water supply.
Impact ifnot executed:
Failure to meet safe water standards and more water line failures and would be in violation of
Department of Social Health Services (DSHS) compliance agreement.
Remarks
This project has been Identified in the Water Comprehensive Plan as T -2.
.
if
Corrosion Control Facility
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: WT32-99
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Water SCADA
Project #: WT37-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs I
The Supervisors Control and Data Acquistion (SCADA) Planning/Design: $50,000
project involves upgrading the alann and control system for the Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Jones Street, 'E' Street Reservoirs and the Elwha Emergency Construction: $50,000
Valve. Other: $100,000
Total: $200,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $150,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $150,000
Yearlv EXDense Summary - CapitallNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$150,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000
Yr Const Comp: T First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: SO
SEPA Required
No
Other Permits
No
.
Funding Sources 1
Rates TWater Rates $150,000
Notes: I $150,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 3
Justification:
The existing alann panel IS almost 25 years old and has become unreliable. The new system besides
improving reliability and reducing overtime will provide expanded control and monitoring capabilities
to better insure compliance with clean water laws.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued problems with false alarms or no alarms during emergencies. Crews are spending extra time
on both a regular and overtime basis weekly to deal with alarm problems.
I
. [emorb
J
Water SCADA
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: WT37-99
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
---
Project #: WT46-99
. Southeast Reservoir
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Water project involves constructing a new reservoir for Planning/Design: $425,000
the high system which also serves the majority of the eastern Land/Right-of-Way: $300,000
Urban Growth Area (UGA). T-his projilGt-wi-llalse-inv(}lve-the ConstructIon: $2,525,000
~nd--con5tFUGtjon-of-a -pIpelIne -to- tie- the-current Other: $0
~ffenrMill-C-reekto..the^flew-Fesewoir in the high -system. Total: $3,250,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $780,000
RateslTaxes: $2,470,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $3,250,000
Yearlv Expense Summarl! - CavitallNet Overatine
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $25,000 $700,000 $2,525,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,250,000
Yr Const Comp: T First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation PUD contribution (may be through additional rate charge) $780,000
Rates Water Rates and Bonds $2,470,000
Notes: T $3,250,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: Yes
Contract: Yes
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 7
Justijlcation: IS
The new reservoir aRd pipl1llifle are needed to provide the necessary water for daily needs as well as the
fire flow requirements for the high system and the development occuring in the eastern UGA.
Impact ifnot executed:
Restricting development in the upper system and eastern UGA area and could delay annexation.
Remarks
This project has been identified in the Water Comprehensive Plan as S-2 and D-6.
.
,j
Southeast Reservoir
Project #: WT46-99
Area Map
.
'MADDOCk RD.
~
I;i
:Ie
8
n lfi
PAUUNE
ffi g
In
~ 101
'0
lr
HUGHE:S
:l!:
D-l
--
---
6ROWN
ALPINE
~
f!:
0 .
z
8
Q::
P~!t~f~'t-
0-6
APPRO X IMA TE
LOCATION
$-2
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Pipeline to New High Zone Reservoir
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves improving reliabilIty of seTVlce to Planning/Design: $60,000
customers in the high zone of the CIty'S system by connecting Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
the proposed new hIgh zone reservoir (WT46-99) to the high Construcllon: $525,000
zone transmission system via approximately 4,000 feet of 16- Other: $0
inch diameter pipeline. Total: $585,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donallons/Grants/Loans: $250,000
RateslTaxes: $335,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $585,000
Project #: WT55-99
Yearlv EXDense Summan _ CapitallNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $60,000 $525,000 $0 $0 $0 $585,000
Vr Const Comp: r 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Funding Sources
DonatIOn Contributions from PUD (could be in the form of higher ra $250,000
Rates Water Rates and Bonds $335,000
Notes: I $585,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 8
o
Justification:
The new pipeline is needed to provide the necessary water for daily needs as well as the fire flow
requirements for the high zone system and the development occuring in the eastern Urban Growth
Area (UGA).
Impact ifnot executed:
Low water flows and inadequate fire flows for the area could result. Restricting development in the
upper system and eastern UGA and could delay annexation.
.
Remarks
This project has been identified in the Water Comprehensive Plan as D-6.
J
Pipeline to New High Zone Reservoir
Project #: WT55-99
Area Map
.
Pblt'ii~~
n
PAUliNE:
i
HUGHE:S
~
6RO~
D-I
~
NAODOCK RO.
0-6
:z
IoJ
rn
~
APPRO X IMA TE
LOCA T ION
$-2
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Project #: WT56-99
. Spruce Street Fire _pump
.
.
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
The project involves mstalhng a new pump capable ofmeetmg Planning/Design: $10,000
fire flow demands withm the Fairmont subzone. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction: $65,000
Other: $0
Total: $75,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $75,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $75,000
Yearlv Expense SummarlJ - CapitallNet OveratinK
Prior Years 1 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
Yr Const Comp: T First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
SEPA Required
No
Other PermIts
No
Funding Sources I,
Rates IWater Rates $75,000
Notes: 1 $75,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Cost Center:
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Div. Priority: 10
Justification:
The existing pumps at the Spruce Street station cannot meet the City's goal of providing a flow of
1,000 GPM for residential areas. This fire pump would be an addition to the existing Spruce Street
booster pump.
Impact ifnot executed:
Lack of reliable domestic and fire flows.
Remarks
This project has been Identified in the Water Comprehensive Plan as P-3.
j
Spruce Street Fire Pump
Area Map
Project #: WT56-99
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
.
,
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Project #: WT57-99
. Elwha Pump Station Disinfection
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
This Water project involves modifying the method of Planning/Design: $25,000
disinfection by installatIOn of a hypochlorite system. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction: $150,000
Other. $0
Total: $175,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $175,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $175,000
Yearlv Exoense Summar _ CapitallNet Operatinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $0 $0 $175,000
Yr Const Comp: T 1 First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates IWater Rates $175,000
Notes: 1 $175,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
.
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 15
Justification:
This project is a part of the change over for the method of disinfection used at all of our sites. The
conversion is away from chlorine gas to a hypochlorite system. This system eliminates the need to use
chlorine gas. The conversion of the existing physical areas where we use the chlorine gas to an
acceptable system is as costly as the conversion to the hypochlorite system but the hypochlorite system
is safer to the environment and our employees. Most of our reservoirs are located in residential areas
and we want to eliminate as many risks to our operation as possible.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued use of the old chlorine gas system and its operational problems. Continued risk to the
nearby residents.
Remarks
This project has been identified in the Water Comprehensive Plan as T -1.
.
J
EJwha Pump Station Disinfection
Project #: WT57-99
Area Map
,.
(
(
\ .
11 ) I
\~
....
~\ \~
i ~LJb
l
----...
'-
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
.
Black Diamond Reservoir.
Project #: WT59-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs Water project involves constructing a cover for the Planning/Design: $100,000
reservoir and disinfection to Improve water quality and Land/Right-of-Way: $0
exposure to contamination. Construction: $800,000
Other: $0
Total: $900,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $808,000
RateslT axes: $92,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $900,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summarll - Capita/INet Operatin!!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$100,000 I $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $900,000
Yr Const Comp: I I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: SO
.
Funding Sources
Grant SRF $250,000
Loan Public Works Trust Fund $558,000
Rates Water Rates $92,000
Notes: -I $900,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: Yes
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 2
Justification:
The construction ofa cover over all reservoirs is required by the State Department of Health to
eliminate potential risks of contamination of the water supply. Installation of the roofs will also reduce
the amount of disinfection. The converSlOn is away from chlorine gas to a hypochloride system. The
hypochloride system is safer.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued exposure of potential contammation risks and would be in violatlOn ofthe Washington
Department of Health compliance agreement.
.
Remarks
This project has been identified in the Water Comprehensive Plan as 8-3.
j
Black Diamond Reservoir.
Project #: WT59-99
Area Map
~
~ -\/-
l
c:=:
""""'""'=
-.
=
=
~ -=
G
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
..
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. McDougal Subzone Fire Pump
Project #: WT64-99
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
This project involves installing a water booster pumping Planning/Design: $10,000
capable of delivering fire flow demands within the McDougal Land/Right-of-Way: $0
subzone. Construction: $65,000
Other: $0
Total: $75,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $75,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $75,000
Yearlv Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operatinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
Yr Const Comp: I I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates lWater Rates $75,000
Notes: 1 $75,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
.
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 9
Justification:
This small area of the system meets daily requirements but cannot meet the fire flow requirements.
Therefore, a booster pump is needed to assist in the supply of adequate flows for fire fighting.
Impact ifnot executed:
Less than desirable fire flows for the area and could affect insurance rating.
Remarks
This project has been Identified in the Water Comprehensive Plan as P-4.
.
J
McDougal Subzone Fire Pump
Project #: WT64-99
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Area Map
.
r
~;
l
/
lr
.,..-"
"
~Q
~\
~
\\
AD ~.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. UGA Water Customers
Project #: WT65-99
.
.
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Water project involves purchasmg water system from the PlanninglDesign: $0
POO in the eastern Urban Growth Area (UGA). Land/Right-of-Way: $0
Construction: $500,000
Other: $0
Total: $500,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RatesfTaxes: $500,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $500,000
SEPA Required
No
Other PermIts No
Yearlv Exoense Summan~ - CaoitallNet Opera tin/!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: 2001 Operating Cost Amount: $100,000
Funding Sources
Rates IWater rates $500,000
Notes: I $500,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: No
Cost Center:
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Div. Priority: 12
Justification:
As the City annexes property in the UGA it will be acquiring utility customers and the PUD is entitled
to compensation. Utility rates are one ofthe major factors that will encourage annexation.
Impact ifnot executed:
Could affect annexatIon. The system and customers would remain with the PUD.
Remarks
[
)
UGA Water Customers
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: WT65-99
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Airport Industrial Park Water Line
Project #: WTOI-OO
. I
Project Description I Estimated Project Costs
ThIS project involves the installation of water mains and Planning/Design: $130,000
sefVlces in the Port of Port Angles proposed new industrial Land/Right-of-Way: $0
park south of the airport. Construction: $1,180,000
Other: $0
Total: $1,310,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $1,310,000
RateslTaxes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $1,310,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar' - Capital/Net Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 I 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 r $130,000 $590,000 $590,000 $0 $1,310,000
Yr Const Comp: r 0 I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation . I Funding by Port or others $1,310,000
Notes: I $1,310,000
.
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 13
o
J ustijication:
The Port is proposmg to develop a new industrial park south of the airport which will require city
utilities. The cost estimates provided here are based on the July 2000 study provided by Reid
Middleton. It is assumed at this time the Port or others will provide all necessary funding.
Impact ifnot executed:
Water services would not be available to the industrial park.
. ['markS
j
Airport Industrial Park Water Line
Area Map
Project #: WTOI-OO
.
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Water Treatment Facility
Project #: WT02-01
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS project mvolves the desIgn and construction of a filtratlon Planning/Design: $1,000,000
facIlity to meet the reqUIrements by the Department of Health Land/Rlght-of-Way. $0
(DOH) and Envlfonmental ProjectIOn Act (EPA). Construction: $9,000,000
Other $0
Total: $10,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer. $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes. $0
Unknown: $10,000,000
Total. $10,000,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar _ CapitallNet Opera tin!!
Prior Years I 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Unknown IUnfunded $10,000,000
INotes: ! $10,000,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Pubhc Works & Utilities Diyision: Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
o
Diy. Priority: 17
Justification:
May need this facIlity to meet the DOH and EP A's surface water treatment rule.
Impact ifnot executed:
May be out of comphance wIth the State and Federal dnnking water requirements.
Remarks
The location of the project is unknown at thIS time, however, It WIll likely be along the Elwha Water
TransmissIOn Lme between the Elwha River and mtersection of 18th Street and Milwaukee Dr.
Water Treatment Facility
Project #: WT02-01
Area Map
.
/-\
l \
(' \,
\ l \
'-,.~ J' \, ~
'~ l ~
(
)
<
'\
"
\
".
7 \
~ \..
''''' \;
I...
I"#">'
\ <'
} \
r -~-
~r--~""'
o 01
\~
.~, \
\},
'.\
\~l,
'\~"
.~,
~-
~~,
0,;;"
'~
::;.~
\,
...~....
~.....::--....
~.
~~
....~
" ~./"
(J
l ,//
l /
) I
t' I
\
rr \
J I (' C\\
\ \
,~ \,
\\, .J' \~
~\ \
\\,,,"'" \
" \. ~'-::\
'1.\ '. , \_ I}
"'----..
..---...
,
.
~ ,I............
l ".
,1-'-\ / (
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
--
.
.
~
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Laurel Street Outfall Extension
Project #: WW04-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Wastewater project involves extendmg the Laurel Street Planning/Design: $30,000
combined sewer overflow outfall into deeper water farther Land/Right-of-Way: $0
from the shoreline. Construction: $150,000
Other: $0
Total: $180,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RatesfTaxes: $180,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $180,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar" - CaoitallNet Ooerating
Prior Years 2001 J 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $150,000 $0 $180,000
Yr Const Comp: T First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates TWastewater Rates $180,000
Notes: 1 $180,000
The design will begin in year 2003 ($30,000) and construction will begin in 2004 ($150,000).
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Waste Water
Contact: Jeff Young
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 10
Justification:
The existing outfall is located close to the shoreline. When a Combined Sewer Outfall (CSO) occurs it
is visible from the shore. In addition, the outfall is in need of repair. This repair would be completed at
the same time as the extension.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued use of the existing facility.
Remarks
Other possible permits are hydraulic and shoreline.
J
Laurel Street Outfall Extension
Area Map
Project #: WW04-99
.
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
--
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
. Golf Course Road Sewer Interceptor
Project #: WWOS-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS project mvolves extendmg the sewer mam from the Penn PlanninglDesign: $120,000
Street/First Street area directly to the WWTP to reduce Land/Rlght-of-Way: $20,000
Combined Sewer Outfall (CSO) at Francis Street. This project Construction: $860,000
will also provide additIOnal capacity for the new areas to the Other: $0
south that is proposed for higher densities. Total: $1,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
DonatIons/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $1,000,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $1,000,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Yearly Expense Summary - CapitallNet Operatin/!
. Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $140,000 $860,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: SO
Funding Sources
Rates 1Wastewater Rates $1,000,000
Notes: .1 $1,000,000
This is to be an annual project beginning m year 2001 and continue until the removal of roof drains are
complete.
.
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: Yes
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Waste Water
Contact: Jeff Young
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 7
Justification:
The areas south of Melody Lane and Lmdberg Road along Golf Course Road will reache the capacity
of the existing sewer line that serves the area. An additional line will be needed to serve the proposed
development density. This line would also provide some relief for the sewer lines in Georgiana Street
which is ultimately where this areas flow goes and would also help to reduce CSO events at Francis
Street. The new line would provide a more direct route to the WWTP and provide extra capacity in the
force main.
Impact ifnot executed:
The sewer line will not meet the needs of the proposed growth in tbe area and restrictions on growth
may be necessary if improvements are not made. CSO events will not be reduced.
Remarks
.l
I
)
Golf Course Road Sewer Interceptor
Project #: WW05-99
Area Map
.
'--
~ 3RO AVE..
CJ)
a::
UJ
:J:
U
Q;::
::l
o
m
{I} 471-1 AV[, t;
~ 57H A'vE. ~
-< -l
(D 61H AVE ~
RYJl/>.I
DR.
~
ro
'-..
.
I
PbtjL~t~t"
n
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Oak Street Outfall Extension
Project #: WW06-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves replacmg the damaged pIpe and PlanninglDesign: $30,000
extending the outfall into deeper water of the harbor. Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction: $170,000
Other: $0
Total: $200,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $200,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $200,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CaDitallNet Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $170,000 $0 $200,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates TWastewater Rates $200,000
Notes: I $200,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: Yes
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Waste Water
Contact: Jeff Young
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 11
Justification:
The existing outfall is located close to the shoreline. When a CSO occurs it is visible from the shore.
In addition, the outfall is in need of repair. This repair would be completed at the same time as the
extension.
Impact ifnot executed:
Continued us of the existmg facihty.
Remarks
Other possible permits are hydraulic and shoreline.
J
Oak Street Outfall Extension
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: WW06-99
.
.
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Sewer Pump Stations 1 & 3 Improvements
Project #: WW25-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves eliminatmg sewer pump statIOn #1 WIth Planning/Design' $130,000
the construction of a graVIty main to pump statIOn #3 and WIll Land/Rlght-of-Way: $70,000
upgrade pump station #3 to add additional capacity. Construction: $400,000
Other: $0
Total: $600,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Rates/Taxes: $600,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $600,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summar' - Cao;tallNet Ooeratinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $100,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates IWastewater Rates $600,000
Notes: I $600,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: Yes
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Waste Water
Contact: Jeff Young
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 3
Justification:
Sewer pump station #1 is neanng its capacity and needs to be enlarged. Pump station #1 is also
located in a residential front yard, has caused odor problems, and flooding damage. When pump
station #11S eliminated, pump station will need to be upgraded to handle the additional capacity.
Impact ifnot executed:
Eventual restriction of growth in the area served by these stations. Odor and flooding problems will
continue to occur.
Remarks
[
J
Sewer Pump Stations 1 & 3 Improvements
Area Map
Project #: WW25-99
.
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
.
III CSO Reduction
Project #: WW26-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project IS to address both the Infiltration and Inflow (III) Planning/Design: $100,000
and Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) of the city's sewer Land/Right-of-Way: $0
system. This project involves removal of roof drains and other Construction: $575,000
inflow stormwater sources from the sewer system. Other: $0
Total: $675,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslT axes: $675,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $675,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar _ CaTJitallNet OTJeratin/!
Prior Years I 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 I $100,000 $105,000 $110,000 $115,000 $120,000 $125,000 $675,000
Yr Const Comp: T I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
.
Funding Sources 1
Rates IWaste Waterrates $675,000
Notes: 1 $675,000
A pilot proJect, to remove roof drains, is scheduled for the Fall of 2001 in the High School area.
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Waste Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 5
Justification:
Requirement of our National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Waste Discharge
Permit to operate the Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) to reduce flows to the plant and reduce
Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs).
Impact if not executed:
Violation of the NPDES permit and continued CSO overflows will occur.
Remarks
_r
I
J
III CSO Reduction
Project #: WW26-99
Area Map
-.
AVE.
OCK
FOGAR TY
FOREST
C L MBUS
VASHON -AV .
PARK AVE.
t--"
if)
~
<(
o
r-:'
UJ
-.J
W
HIGH
SCHOOL
.
T AVE.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Annual Replacements Lines
Project #: WW27-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIS project mvolves annual replacement of aging sewer lmes. Planning/Design" $0
Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction: $675,000
Other: $0
Total: $675,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $675,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $675,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Expense Summar - CapitallNet Operatinl!
Prior Years 2001 r 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $100,000 I $105,000 $110,000 $115,000 $120,000 $125,000 $675,000
Yr Const Comp: I I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Rates IWaste Water rates I $675,000
Notes: I $675,000
City Priority:
Lega) Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Waste Water
Contact: Doyle McGinley
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 2
Justification:
Many sewer lines are at an age where more frequent failures can be anticipated. This program will
identify and replace those lines on a non-emergency basis.
Impact ifnot executed:
If the sewer lines are not replaced, there will continue costly repairs, plugged lines, and storm water
bemg collected in the sanitary sewer lines.
Remarks
.l
J
Annual Replacements Lines
Area Map
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
Project #: WW27-99
.
.
.
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Backup Generator
Project #: WW28-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Waste Water project involves addmg a backup generator Planmng/Design: $0
for the waste water treatment plant to provide electncity should land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
utility service fail. Construcllon: $30,000
Other: $70,000
Total: $100,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $100,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $100,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Year/v EXDense Summan~ - Capital/Net OperatinJ~
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Yr Const Comp: I First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources 1
Rates lWaste Waterrates $100,000
Notes: ~I $100,000
$30,000 for the constructlOn of the site and $70,000 for the equipment.
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: Yes
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Waste Water
Contact: Jeff Young
Justification:
To prevent unpermitted releases of raw sewage power is required at all times.
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 1
Impact ifnot executed:
Violation of our permit and release of raw sewage.
Remarks
l
J
Backup Generator
Project #: WW28-99
Area Map
t-=
(I) ~ 3RD AVE.
=> (/) ~ (,I) 41H AVE. t-=
~ w (n
(/) () :z: w (/)
w u 511-1 A \IE.
2: W :::.:: ~
c..> I.JJ 0::: <(
Q:J ::;:)
0 LD 6TH AVE. C!>
aJ
RYAN
DR.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
.
.
.
e
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Compost Facility Upgrade
Project #: WW36-99
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This Solid Waste project mvolves upgradmg our compost Planning/Design: $160,000
facility to produce class A compost by extendmg leachate lines Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
to the site, adding a covered dry area and a one acre asphalt Construction: $840,000
pad. Add additional covered area for biosolids storage. Other: $0
Total: $1,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RaleslTaxes: $1,000,000
Unknown: $0
Total: $1,000,000
. Yearlv Expense Summar" - CapitallNet Ooeratinf!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$10,000 $50,000 $100,000 $840,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Yr Const Comp: r First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts Yes
Funding Sources
Rates IWaste Water Rates $1,000,000
Notes: T 51,000,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Waste Water
Contact: Jeff Young
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 4
Justification:
This is a requirement of the National pollutant Discharge Elinunation System Waste Discharge
Permit (NPDES). The NPDES perlTIlt requires us to make beneficial use of the sludge produced by
our treatment plant. Sludge mixed with grin dings of wood waste can produce class A compost which
can be sold.
Impact ifnot executed:
Rely on other methods of sludge disposal. Currently proceeding with land application program
[em.r~
\
J
Compost Facility Upgrade
Area Map
Project #: WW36-99
~
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
.
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Project #: WW02-00
. Airport Industrial Sewer
.
.
Project Description Estimated Project Costs I
This project involves the installatlOn of sanitary sewer mains Planning/Design: $100.000
and services in the Port of Port Angeles proposed new Land/Right-of-Way: $0
industrial park south of the airport. Construction: $1.000,000
Other: $0
Total: $1,100,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $1,100,000
Rates/Taxes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $1,100,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other PermIts
No
Year'v Expense Summarll- Capital/Net Operating
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $100,000 $500,000 $500,000 $0 $1,100,000
Yr Const comp:f 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Donation TFunding by Port or others $1,100,000
Notes: I $1,100,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Waste Water
Contact: Jeff Young
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 8
Justification:
The Port is proposing to develop a new industrial park south of the airport which will require city
utilities. The cost estimates provided here are based on the July 2000 study provided by Reid
Middleton. It is anticipated the Port of Port Angeles or developers will provide all necessary funding.
Impact ifnot executed:
Sewer services would not be available to the mdustrial park.
Remarks
I
J
Airport Industrial Sewer
Area Map
Project #: WW02-00
.
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
.
.
"
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Lindberg Rd Sewer LID
Project #: WW03-00
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
ThIs project mvolves extendmg the sewer mam on Lmdberg Planning/Design: $100,000
Rd. from Just east of Golf Course Rd. to Del Guzzi Dr. The Land/Rlght-of-Way' $0
project would provide additIOnal capacity and serVIce to new Construction: $900,000
areas to the south of Lmdberg Rd. Other: $0
Total. $1,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $1,000,000
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
Ratesrr axes. $0
Unknown. $0
Total: $1,000,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits
No
Yearlv Expense Summar - Capital/Net Opera tin!! I
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $100,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
Funding Sources
Fund Transfer ILID ConstructIOn Funds $1,000,000
Notes: I $1,000,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Pubhc Works & UtilitIes Division: Waste Water
Contact: Jeff Young
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 9
Justification:
The area south of Lmdberg Rd. IS not able to be served by the sewer line that serves the area along
Golf Course Rd. ThIS line would provide the abihty for growth.
Impact ifnot executed:
The sewer line WIll not meet the needs of the growth m the area and restrictions on growth would be
necessary.
Remarks
I
Lindberg Rd Sewer LID
Area Map
Project #: WW03-00
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
~
:l
5
.r
~
~
.
.
--
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
.
Annexation Interceptor Sewer Main
Project #: WWOI-Ol
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project mvolves constructing sewer mterceptors In phases Plannmg/Design: $600,000
to serve the eastern Urban Growth Area (UGA). Land/Rlght-of-Way: $0
Construction: $4,900,000
Other: $0
Total: $5,500,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $5,500,000
RateslT axes: $0
Unknown: $0
Total: $5,500,000
SEPA ReqUired Yes
Other Permits
No
Yearlv Expense Summar" - CapitallNet Operatinl!
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $250,000 $2,100,000 $0 $350,000 $2,800,000 $5,500,000
Yr Const Comp: T First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
.
Funding Sources
Donation IDeveloper Reimbursement Account, LID $5,500,000
Notes: I $5,500,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: Yes
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Waste Water
Contact: Gary Kenworthy
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 6
Justification:
There are no sewer collection facilities in the eastern UGA area proposed for annexation. Many of the
existing septic systems are failing.
Impact ifnot executed:
'Restricted growth and limited development. Failing septic systems can pose a health hazard.
.
Remarks
[
oj
Annexation Interceptor Sewer Main
Project #: WWOI-Ol
Area Map
.
d
II::
I-
~
~
...
::E
iJ
.
",..ooook ID.
SUNRISE"
SUIAWITT
ROY
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
.
Francis Street Reservoir
Project #: WW02-01
Project Description Estimated Project Costs
This project involves desIgning and constructmg a storage tank Planning/Design: $1,000,000
for Combined Sewer Overflows (CSO). The CSO tank would Land/Right-of-Way: $0
be designed to remove settled solids and store excess flows Construction: $9,000,000
from five main overflow sites along RaIlroad Ave. and at Other: $0
Francis Street. Total: $10,000,000
Estimated Project Funding
Fund Transfer: $0
Donations/Grants/Loans: $0
RateslTaxes: $0
Unknown: $10,000,000
Total: $10,000,000
SEPA Required Yes
Other Permits Yes
Yearlv Exoense Summar" - CaoitallNet Ooeratin~
Prior Years 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Yr Const Comp: I 0 First Year of Operating Cost: 0 Operating Cost Amount: $0
.
Funding Sources
Unknown lUnfunded $10,000,000
Notes: T $10,000,000
City Priority:
Legal Mandate: No
Concurrency: No
Contract: Yes
Department: Public Works & Utilities Division: Waste Water
Contact: Jeff Young
Cost Center:
Div. Priority: 12
Justification:
Requirement of our National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Waste Discharge
Permit to operate the Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) to reduce flows to the plant and reduce
the CSOs.
Impact~notexecuted:
Violation of the NPDES permit and contmued CSO overflows being pumped to the WWTP.
Remarks
The SIze and cost of the holding tank would be reduced, possibly eliminated, as the separation of the
stonn drain and sanitary sewer lines occur.
.
Francis Street Reservoir
Area Map
Project #: WW02-01
.
.
REVIEW:
Department Head Date:
Planning Director Date:
Finance Director: Date:
City Engineer: Date:
City Manager: Date:
.
.
.
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
June 5, 2001
MAYOR DOYLE AND CITY COUNCIL
Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk/Management AssistantW
Appointment to Fill Vacancy on
Construction Code Board of Appeals
Summary: A vacancy on the Construction Code Board of Appeals was created by the resignation
of Steve Anderson. Applicant Jerry Schwagler was interviewed by the Community Development
Director and the Building Official.
Recommendation: . It is recommended that the City Council appoint Mr. Jerry Schwagler
to the membership of the Construction Code Board of Appeals for the unexpired term ending
February 28, 2002.
Backeround / Analysis: In April, 2001, Mr. Steve Anderson submitted his resignation from
the Construction Code Board of Appeals. He accepted a new position in the Seattle area, requiring
his absence from Port Angeles during the work week.
Mr. Jerry Schwagler submitted an application to fill this vacancy. He was recently interviewed by
Community Development Director Collins and Building Official Haehnlen, both of whom
recommend Mr. Schwagler's appointment.
Attachment
33
FO~~ANG~~~~
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A
--..-.--..-..... ...--.---.
'io) ~ @ ~ ~ 'I!l ~ ~I
~ lrU APR!,Q m ~I
.1
... ~~ '''\
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY CLERK
.
Application for Appointment to a Board, Commission, or Committe~
Board, Commission, or C<2mmittee to which you ar
T/otJ()
Board or CommisslOn Full Name
'(!)/9/Zl)
cs
Board or CommisslOn Full Name "
Board or Commission Full Name
Applicant Name and General Information
JSQ...7 g~~~/ee
First MI d L",. .
~ 3 fJ-Ll ef3 \2 __.
Home ,tree. addre" /
~DQ+ ~5&~
City State
tOP.
~~36,3
Zip Code
.
~(Pt) - 'YJ~ -/8c!Jf'
Home phone number / '
Work phone number
Certification and Location Information CIrcle one
Are you currently a City employee? Yes@ Are you a cItizen of the United States?@No
Are you a CIty resident? Yes~ Do you own/manage a business In the CIty? Yes~
Do you hold any professional hcenses, r;gis,atlOns or certIficates in any field (list below)@No
{51?7v'GfLRL Bf.I/Ld/~ ~~ l-eJtIl
Are you aware of any conflIct of interest which might anse by your service on a City Board or Commission? If so,
please explam:
In compliance wIth the Amencan Disabilities Act, if you will need specIal accommodations because of a phYSical
hmltahon, please contact the City Clerk, 417-4634, so appropriate arrangements can be made.
(OVER)
.
34
.
.
.
Work Experience
List most recent experience first (or elaborate on a resume If you prefer)
I.~-J C(WI-~'J;j,jllli,r?~ If'/,6 f?~,
Employer Your Title From (MN) To (MfY)
c?~ B<<<d~ Li-h.pL
Bnef Job descnpnon
,~dF
2.
Employer
Your Title
From (MN)
To (MfY)
Brief Job descnption
3.
Employer
Your Title
From (MfY)
To(MfY)
Brief job descnpnon
Education
List most recent experience first
Xes No
1.
Institution/LocatIOn
-' -~
. \
Credits eamedlMaJor area of study
. Graduated?
Yes No -
2.
Instltutlon/Locatlon
Gredits eamedlMaJor a~ea of study
Graduated?
Yes No
3.
Institution/LocatIOn
,
Credits eamedlMaJor area of study ~
. -GradUated?
Charitable, Social, and Civic Activities and Memberships
List major activities you have partlclpated in dunng the last five years
1.
Orgamzatlon and location
Group's purpose/objective
# of members
Brief descnptIOn of your participatIOn
2.
Orgamzation and location
Group's purpose/objective
# of members
Brief descripnoo OfYoorP"'k'~
~~
App' ant 19 ature
l' - ~/ -e:>/
.", ,
Date
Submit completed forms to: Office of the City Clerk, CIty of Port Angeles, 321 E. 5th Street, P. O. Box 1150,
Port Angeles, Washmgton, 98362 1/99
35
.
.
.
36
.
.
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
June 5, 2001
MAYOR DOYLE AND CITY COUNCIL
Brad Collins, Community Development Director ~
2001 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS CPA 01-01
Summary: State law and the City's Comprehensive Plan allow for amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan once a year during the month of June. Six sets of amendments are proposed
and have been reviewed and recommended by the Planning Commission. The first set of
amendments addresses updated additions and descriptions of the City's planning areas and
thereby include the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area (UGA). The second amendment clarifies
the intent of the policy that restricts new commercial areas along the alternate local crosstown
route or the crosstown truck route. The third set of amendments satisfies compliance with
changes the State Legislature made to the Growth Management Act regarding the declaration of
highways of state-wide significance as essential public facilities. The fourth amendment reverses
the City's prior policy of not extending urban services outside the City without annexation and
allows for City services and facilities in the UGA. The fifth amendment provides a new
objective to act in compliance with the Endangered Species Act. The sixth set of amendments
involves 24 policy changes requested by the Nonmotorized Advisory Committee. The proposed
language for all six sets of amendments has been modified by staff and/or the Planning
Commission as recommended to the City Council.
Recommendation: Following testimony at the June 5, 2001, public hearing, the staff
recommends that the City Council move to continue the public hearing on CPA 01-01 to
7:00 pm at its re2ular meetin2 now scheduled for Monday June 18, 2001.
Background/Analysis:
The City Council's Utility Advisory Committee will review the proposed Comprehensive
Plan amendments at their June 11, 2001, meeting. A draft Ordinance and a set of Findings and
Conclusions as recommended by the Planning Commission are attached. A draft of the Planning
Commission's May 23, 2001, meeting minutes is attached as well and will be made final at the
Planning Commission's June 13,2001, meeting. The May 23,2001, staffreport on CPA 01-01 also
is attached. A separate City Council memo providing further staff analysis will be provided for the
City Council's June 18, 2001, meeting.
Attachments: Ordinance
Findings and ConclUSIons
Planning Commission Minutes Excerpt
Staff Report
37
.
.
.
38
ORDINANCE NO.
.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, amending
Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan by updating
additions and descriptions of the City's planning areas to include the
Port Angeles Urban Growth Area (UGA), by amending a policy in the
Commercial Goals and Polices section of the Land-Use Element to
clarify the intent, by amending policies in the Transportation Element to
comply with the Growth Management Act; by amending policies in the
Utilities and Public Services Element to allow for City services and
facilities in the UGA, by adding a new item to the Objective section of
the Conservation Element to comply with the Endangered Species Act,
and by amending sections of the Transportation Element, the Utilities
and Public Services Element, and the Capital Facilities element as
requested by the Nonmotorized Advisory Committee.
WHEREAS, the City of Port Angeles adopted its present Comprehensive Plan on June
28, 1994, by Ordinance 2818; and
WHEREAS, the City has established a process for amending the Comprehensive Plan
.
by Ordinance 2858 and Chapter 18.04 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, SEP A review of the proposed amendments was completed on April 24,
2001; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing, has considered the Planning
Commission's recommendations, and has entered its findings and conclusions addressing elements
set forth in PAMC 18.04.060 and in support of adopting the proposed 2001 Comprehensive Plan
amendment; and
WHEREAS, the proposed 2001 Comprehensive Plan amendment has been determined
to be consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan, the Clallam County-Wide Planning
Policy, the Growth Management Act, and the public health, safety, and welfare;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
.
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
- 1 -
39
Section 1. Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby
amended by amending the Land Use section ofthe Community Profile to read as follows: .
II. COMMUNITY PROFILE
Land Use
The Comprehensive Plan divides the City into 5.8. planning areas. For the purpose of description,
the individual planning areas are identified as the Harbor, Northwest, Southwest, North Central, and
South Central, East. Eastern Urban Growth Area and Western Urban Growth Area planning areas.
These areas are located on Figure 3 and are described as follows.
The Harbor planning area contains the Coast Guard Station, the Port and Salmon Club boat ramps,
Ediz Hook Park, and Daishowa Mill on Ediz Hook. The historic downtown and waterfront are also
essential parts ofthis subarea. The boat haven marina, log export terminal, the K-Ply mill, the Coho
Ferry terminal, City Pier, and Rayonier Mill line the waterfront. Entertainment activities (movie
theater, bookstores, antique shops, galleries, and restaurants) abound within the pedestrian oriented
central business district.
The Northwest planning area covers the western edge of town lying beyond Tumwater Creek and
north of the airport. This area is comprised largely of older homes. There is a commercial area
serving the residents along C Street. A pocket ofindustriallcommercial activities are located alOng.
the Tumwater Truck Route/Highway 101 junction. This area of town has limited access because
of the Tumwaterl Creek ravine and the bluffs. It also has the largest segment of undeveloped
residential land within the current City limits.
The Southwest planning area includes Fairchild International Airport, the Clallam County
Fairgrounds and Lincoln Park. Industrial development is located at the airport industrial park. A
few homes lie within the City limits along Lower Elwha Road, but otherwise this planning area
contains predominantly industrial and park (recreation) land uses.
The North Central planning area is the older more dense portion of town. It is an area divided by
Valley, Peabody and EnnislWhite's Creek ravines. It contains all of the municipal buildings and
Clallam County building and courthouse. The commercial uses along Lincoln Street provide
community shopping opportunities. Recreation is provided by a number of parks and the Peninsula
Public Golf Course. Much of the city's multifamily housing is within this planning area.
The South Central planning area is the area of town with newer homes, on larger lots. This is where
the street pattern changes from traditional blocks to cul-de-sacs. Many views of Port
Angeles Harbor and the Strait of Juan de Fuca are available. The Port Angeles High School lies
within this planning area. The Olympic National Park Headquarters and Visitors Center is along
the Heart of the Hills Road. At the eastern edge of this subaH:a is the Peninsula Community
College.
The East planning area is the area of the existing city limits easterly of Race Street. This area has .
a mix of older homes and newer residential subdivisions and development. as well as portion ofthe
- 2 -
40
.
main commercial corridor. Marine views from upper elevations are possible. along with mountain
views. This planning area includes Peninsula College facilities and Peninsula Golf Club.
The Eastern Urban Growth Area is generally the area east ofthe city limits. Remnant properties in
the UGA that are located south ofthe city limits and east of Valley Creek are considered in this area
until annexation occurs whereby they will be considered to be part of the adiacent planning area.
Policies for this planning area are adopted by Clallam County as a part of the Port Angeles Regional
Comprehensive Plan.
The Western Urban growth Area is generally the area west and south of the city limits. Remnant
properties in the UGA that are located south of the city limits and west of Valley Creek are
considered in this area until annexation occurs whereby they will be considered to be part of the
adiacent planning area. Policies for this planning area are adopted by Clallam County as a part of
the Port Angeles Regional Comprehensive Plan.
[Note: This amendment includes an update to Figure 3 - Planning Areas]
Section 2. Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby
amended by amending the Commercial Goals and Policies section ofthe Land Use Element to read
as follows:
.
V. LAND-USE ELEMENT
Commercial Goals and Policies
Policy E6. New comprehensive plan commercial area designations areas should not be located
along the alternate local crosstown route or the crosstown truck route.
Section 3. Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby
amended by amending the Policies section of the Transportation Element to read as follows:
VI. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Policies
B8.
The City should shall coordinate with the State Dept. of Transportation. Clallam
County..ls and the Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organizationls
transportation planning efforts. This includes recognition of SR 101 and SR 117. along
with connecting roadways of Front. Lincoln. Railroad. Oak and First Streets to and
from the ferry landings. and along Front Street and Marine Drive and First Street
between SRI 0 I and SRI I? . as transportation facilities of state-wide significance which
are declared essential public facilities under the Growth Management Act. Review of
potential impacts onto these facilities and LOS standards will be incorporated with
future updates to the City's Comprehensive Plan, as required by the Act.
.
- 3 -
41
B19.
The development of the City's comprehensive service and facilities plan for streets,
bikeways, pedestrian walkways, and the overall transportation system, and regional.
transportation plans should all be consistent. These plans. as adopted and hereafter
amended. are incorporated herein.
Section 4. Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby
amended by amending the Policies section of the Utilities and Public Services Element to read as
follows:
VII. UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT
Policies
AI. Public facilities should be equitably distributed across the City's planning areas
including designated Urban Growth Areas.
D3. The City. at its sole discretion. should trot extend urban services outside the City
without annexation.
Section 5. Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby
amended by adding a new item to the Objective section of the Conservation Element, to read as .
follows:
IX. CONSERVATION ELEMENT
Objective
ill.L The City will continue participating in various watershed planning and salmon
recovery efforts. The City will incorporate appropriate measures for the protection of habitat for
listed or threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act when providing public
services and administering land use and development regulations.
Section 6. Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby
amended by amending sections of the Transportation Element, the Utilities and Public Services
element, and the Capital Facilities element to read as follows:
VI. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
General Comments
.
The intent of the Transportation Element is to define in a comprehensive manner how vehicular
-4-
42
.
traffic and nonmotorized means of travel are is to be routed from one portion of the community to
another in the most efficient, economical, and compatible manner. The City's Circulation Plan in
accordance with the Statewide National Functional Classification System identifies the City's
principal arterial streets, minor arterial streets, and collectors with the remaining streets classified
as locals (See Figure 11).
Policies
A2. The safety of non-motorized modes of transportation should be a primary consideration
in the circulation system. Adequate sidewalks, crosswalks, bicy de paths bikeways, and
handicapped access should be provided.
A4. A multimodal transportation center should indude but not be limited to public transit,
C0m111C,r cial bus, taxi, fCll)', and Air por t slmttk ser v ices And should be located in or near
the downtown core and public transportation system.
Objectives
AI.
The City will be an active partner in the development of the Olympic Discovery Trail
which passes through and along key parts of its park. street. pedestrian. and
nonmotorized transportation systems and facilities. The City's Circulation Plan
acknowledges that such a regional trail system serves many functions: it is a means of
intercity commuting. a way to promote economic development. a means to promote a
healthy lifestyle. and a way to provide future utility right-of-way.
.
A2. The City's Comprehensive Plan will continue efforts to improve or provide access to
Valley. Tumwater. Peabody. Ennis. White's Creeks and the development of the
Foothills Trail System.
A3. As an active partner. the City will maintain a Citizen's Advisory Group and will
facilitate communication with Clallam County. the City ofSequim. the DNR and other
public and private groups developing alternative Transportation Systems.
Objectives
B6. The City will consider a variety of traffic management alternatives to increase the
existing street system capacity and implement appropriate options as feasible. Such
alternatives may include:
a. Taking into account nonmotorized use:
ell:!. Remove parking at controlled intersections to provide auxiliary turn lanes to
increase capacity;
.
b~.
Remove parking during selected periods of the day (i.e., noon and PM peak
hour) to create additional through land capacity;
- 5 -
43
ego
Modify signal timing to respond to seasonal and/or daily peak traffic periods to
favor major flows and expand the number of signals that are coordinated as part .
of a system, while assuring enough time for a handicapped citizen to cross when
a signal button is pushed.
B I O. The City will facilitate the implementation of City-adopted transportation plans.
B 15. Road improvements should provide for alternate modes of transportation. and new
roads shall be evaluated for the ability to accommodate alternate modes of
transportation.
VII. UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT
Policies
C6. The City should place special emphasis on the recreational needs of the youth of the
community including bicycle safety education programs.
D5. The City should promote the joint use of transportation rights-of-way and utility
corridors for all forms of transportation. including nonmotorized.
D9. The City should identify lands useful for public purposes, such as utility corridors,
landfills, sewage treatment facilities, transportation (including nonmotOrized)..
recreation, schools, and other public uses.
x. CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Policies
A3. The City shall develop individual comprehensive service and facility plans for the
following utilities capital facilities and/or services:
.
transportation. including streets, and nonmotorized (bikeways and pedestrian
walkways},
water system,
sanitary sewer system,
electrical system,
parks and recreation services, and
emergency services (police, fire, and medical response).
.
.
.
.
.
A4. The City should co-operate with the appropriate private and/or public agencies to
develop individual comprehensive service and facility plans for each of the following
utilities and/or services:
44
.
telecommunications, .
schools,
transportation (air, marine. nonmotorized, and public transit), and solid waste
.
.
- 6 -
!. .J
.
collection and disposal.
A6.
The comprehensive service and facility plan for streets, and nonmotorized (bikeways,
and pedestrian walkways} shall also include specific actions and requirements for
bringing into compliance any street facilities that fall below the required level of
service, including demand management strategies which encourage reduced reliance on
single occupant vehicle trips and encourage use of alternate modes of transportation
such as the bicycles, walkways, and transit riding with incentive programs for and from
local businesses.
Section 7. Said Comprehensive Plan amendment shall be incorporated into the
Comprehensive Plan as kept on file with the City Clerk.
Section 8 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after the date of
publication by summary.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the _ day of
, 2001.
.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary
F IORDINANCES&RESOLUTlONS\2001-19 oId wpd
May 31, 2001
.
- 7 -
45
p-
~
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
PUBLIC WORKS
~
4
ate: 04/30/01
. .'
, .! I
! ! ! !.'l
.-:.- !
.
,
.
:E:
,. i
..."
-."
;.-
.,:- ii
"
,
", ~ '.'1
. .
.# ~.., ,
... .~... . "
..... . .
i." //~ .
......,~
~~,." -.
. -~4. .... ...
\ ,. ',,~.:-':. .' ,
. , ~ -,"
. ,..;~
., _, t.:.
.,
~
en
w
~
c
C!J
::>>
I
~/
ttJ
.\.
.
,
.
.
__I
SCALE
PLANNING AREA MAP
o
I
4800
I
I
2400
correction
.
"'.
.
LN
.....
.
.
.
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AMENDMENT - CPA 01-01:
Findings
1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, CPA 01-01, was submitted prior to March 31, 2001.CP A
01-01 includes six sets of amendments to various sections of the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendments are shown in Exhibit 1 to the staff report.
Amendments Number 1-5 are proposed by City staff and have been altered since the original
proposal as a result of further staff analysis and discussion with the Planning Commission.
Amendment Number 6 is proposed by the ad hoc Nonmotorized Committee.
2. In its deliberation, the Planning Commission reviewed the definitions of "should" and "shall"
as provided in the Comprehensive Plan and recognized that "should" is permissive, giving
the City discretion in its implementation of the adopted policies. The Planning Commission
agreed that using "should" instead of "may" in the proposed amendment No.4 to Utility and
Public Services Policy D3 does not imply a duty on the City to extend services, except as the
City should choose to do so at its sole discretion.
3.
Amendment Number 1 proposes minor changes to the Community Profile Chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan in order to correct the current subarea planning names within the City
limits in addition to adding planning areas names for the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area.
The changes include adding three additional planning area names and descriptions to the text,
as well as reflecting these changes in Figure 3 (map of planning areas).
4. Amendment Number 2 proposes additional clarification to the Commercial Goals and
Policies of the Land Use Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Goal E, Policy 6 states that
new commercial "areas" should not be designated along these routes. Clarification of
whether "areas" implies "uses" or "zones" should be made in this policy to improve its
effectiveness.
5. Amendment Number 3 proposes a change to Transportation Element Goal B, Policy 8, in
order to implement a recent change to RCW 36.70A, Growth Management Act (House Bill
1487, 1998) which requires recognition of essential public facilities, including state routes,
in local comprehensive plans, as well as a requirement to review potential impacts onto these
facilities by local land use designations. Within the City of Port Angeles, State Route 101
and 117 are considered to be essential public facilities, along with connecting spurs to the
ferry landings. Additionally, the proposed amendment would allow for improved connection
between the Comprehensive Plan and other adopted capital facility-related plans by the
additional sentence proposed for Goal B, Policy 19.
6.
Amendment Number 4 proposes changes to the Utilities and Public Services Element ofthe
Comprehensive Plan relating to the provision of public services and utilities outside of the
47
Fmdings and ConclusIOns - CPA OJ-OJ
Page 2
existing City limits but within the designated Urban Growth Area. The proposed addition
to Goal A, Policy 1, references the equitable distribution of public facilities to include the
UGA. Additionally, the proposed amendment to Goal D, Policy 3, would change a long-
standing policy of the City of Port Angeles to not extend City utilities (as compared to
services) outside the city limits, and allow for this to occur depending on feasibility.
7. Amendment Number 5 proposes changes to the Conservation Element that would reiterate
the City's current practice of participation in, and support of, various watershed and salmon
recovery efforts some of which are directly linked to the recent Endangered Species Act
listings of several salmonid species that occur, or may occur, in streams or nearshore areas
within the regulatory jurisdiction of the City, as well a within its area of operations and
maintenance.
8. Amendment Number 6 reflects a proposal by the City's Nonmotorized Committee who has
requested several changes to the Comprehensive Plan.
9. CP AO 1-0 1 was reviewed for internal consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The most
relevant policies include the Growth Management Chapter IV, particularly Goal A, Land Use
Chapter V -Goals A-E, Transportation Chapter VI- Goals A and B, Utilities and Public
Services Chapter VII- Goals A and D, and Capital Facilities Chapter X- Goal A.
10.
48
PAMC 18.04, Comprehensive Plan Implementation and Amendment, sets forth procedures
for annual amendment process which includes deadlines for applications, requirements for
public hearings, deadlines for decisions and criteria for applications and approvals of
amendments. Proposed amendments shall demonstrate: why existing provisions should not
continue, consistency with Growth Management Act goals and specific requirements,
compliance with the county-wide policies, compliance with Capital facilities and related
plans, that it is in the public interest and consistent with the public health, safety and welfare,
and that cumulative effects have been considered.
11. The Public Works comments included revisions to Amendment Number 3 and objections to
four of the proposed changes in Amendment Number 6 relating to Transportation Element
Policy B15, and Capital Facilities Element, General Comments, Policies A7 and A9, and
Objective B1 [Items (g), (P), (t), (u), (w)].
12. The Department of Community Development has the following recommendations for
Amendment Number 6:
Approval as proposed or amended:
~
Item (a) - Transportation Element General Comments; added objectives under Policy A.
Item (c) - Transportation Element Policy A2
Item ( e) - Transportation Element Policy A4
Item (g) - Transportation Element Policy B 15
Item (i) - Transportation Element Objective B6a
Item 0) - Transportation Element Objective B6d.
~
~
~
~
~
.
.
.
.
.
.
... ~ ~ '. .
Fmdmgs and ConclusIOns - CPA 01-01
Page 3
~
, -
Item (k) - Transportation Element Objective B 1 O.
Item(m) - Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C6.
Item (n) - Utilities and Public Services Element Policy D5.
Item (0) - Utilities and Public Services Element Policy D9.
Item (q) - Capital Facilities Element Policy A3.
Item (r) - Capital Facilities Element Policy A4.
Item (s) - Capital Facilities Element Policy A6.
~
~
~
~
~
~
Denial:
~ Item (b) - Transportation Element Policy AI.
· Item (d) - Transportation Element Policy A3.
· Item (f) - Transportation Element Policy B5.
· Item (h) - Transportation Element Policy B16.
· Item (1) - Definitions.
· Item (P) - Capital Facilities General Comments
· Item (t) - Capital Facilities Policy A7
· Item (u) - Capital Facilities Policy A9
· Item (v) - Capital Facilities Element Policy B2.
· Item (w) - Utilities and Public Services Objective B 1
· Item (x) - Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C2.
13. The Fire Department had no comments on the proposal.
14.
The Clallam County Department of Community Development, Planning Division, has
provided comments and supported the proposed changes relating to extension of utilities in
Amendment #4.
15. A Determination of NonSignificance was issued per WAC 197-11-640 on April 24, 2001.
16. Notice of the public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan was
published in accordance with the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
17. No written public comments have been received at the time of the staff report.
Conclusions:
A. Approval of CP AO 1-0 1, Amendment # 1 as listed in Attachment A, would result in improved
internal consistency of the Comprehensive Plan.
B. Approval of CP AO 1-0 1, Amendment #2 as listed in Attachment A, would result in improved
internal consistency of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically the land use and transportation
chapters, and increased effectiveness of these policies.
C.
Approval of CPAOI-0l, Amendment #3 as listed in Attachment A, would result local
adoption of recent changes to the Growth Management Act, RCW36.70A which relate to
essential transportation facilities.
49
Planning Commission Minutes
May 23, 2001
Page 4
D.
Approval of CP AO 1-0 1, Amendment #4 as listed in Attachment A, would result in improved
internal consistency of policies relating to the extension of urban services and utilities to the
unincorporated urban growth areas, and would allow for the provision of urban level of
services to existing and proposed urban-scaled developments in the Urban Growth Area.
.
E. Approval ofCPAOI-0l, Amendment #5 as listed in Attachment A, would result in
F. Approval ofCPAOI-0l, Amendment #5 as listed in Attachment A, would result in increased
effectiveness of policies relating to nonmotorized transportation.
G. Approval of CPA 01-01 as listed in Attachment A, is consistent with Growth Management
Act goals and Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan.
H. Approval of CPA 01-01 as listed in Attachment A, is consistent with the adopted county-
wide policies.
I. Approval of CPA 01-01 as listed in Attachment A, is consistent with Capital facilities and
related plans.
J. Approval of CPA 01-01 as listed in Attachment A, is consistent that it is in the public interest
and consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
K.
The cumulative effects have been considered in review ofCPAOI-0l.
.
L.
CP AOI-0l as listed in Attachment A, is consistent with P AMC 18.04 Comprehensive Plan
Implementation and Amendment.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of June 18, 2001:
Larry Doyle, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
.
50
.
.
.
Plannmg CommISSIOn Mmutes
May 23, 2001
Page 2
Minutes Excerpt
Comprehensive Plan Amendment - CPA Ol-Ol-City of Port An2eles: Proposed
amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan that include updates to planning area names,
utility extensions outside ofthe City limits, habitat protection policies, and implementation
of recent changes to the Growth Management Act relating to the recognition and coordinated
planning of transportation facilities.
Planner Barnes provided the staff report. Clarification was made as to which attachment or exhibit
to reference. Director Collins suggested that an additional finding be made which reflects the City's
discretion in utilizing the word "should" in implementing the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan. The public hearing was opened.
Gary Gleason, Chair, Nonmotorized Committee, 2211 East Seventh Street, provided a written
statement and also responded to several clarifying questions of the Commission.
E.J. Beckett, 421 East 12th Street, spoke in favor of the amendments proposed by the Nonmotorized
Committee, adding her hope that the City continues to promote nonmotorized transportation.
Being no other person wished to testify on the proposal, public hearing was closed.
Amendment #6. The Commission reviewed each of the 24 items in Amendment #6 in addition to
the one proposed as a part ofthe public testimony. Clarifying questions were asked to Mr. Gleason
and staff. Director Collins commented that the City is willing to work with the Nonmotorized
Committee on some of their suggestions in the future. Discussion followed. The Commission
agreed to several additional revisions, some rejections, and approvals of the recommended changes,
as follows:
Approval as proposed or amended:
~ Item (a) - TransportatIon Element General Comments; added objectIves under Pohcy A.
~ Item (c) - TransportatIon Element PolIcy A2
~ Item (e) - Transportation Element Policy A4
~ Item (g) - TransportatIon Element PolIcy B 15
~ Item (i) - TransportatIon Element ObjectIve B6a
~ Item (j) - TransportatIOn Element ObjectIve B6d.
~ Item (k) - TransportatIOn Element ObjectIve BIO.
~ Item (m) - UtIlItIes and PublIc ServIces Element PolIcy C6.
~ Item (n) - Utilities and Public Services Element PolIcy D5.
~ Item (0) - Utilities and PublIc Services Element PolIcy D9.
~ Item (q) - CapItal FacilitIes Element Policy A3.
~ Item (r) - Capital FacilitIes Element Policy A4.
~ Item (s) - CapItal Facilities Element PolIcy A6.
Demal:
~ Item (b) - TransportatIOn Element Policy AI.
51
52
Planning CommissIOn Minutes
May 23, 2001
Page 3
.
Item (d) - TransportatIOn Element Pohcy A3.
Item (f) - TransportatIOn Element Pohcy B5.
Item (h) - Transportation Element Pohcy B16.
Item (I) - DefmItIons.
Item (p) - Capital Facilities General Comments
Item (t) - CapItal Facilities PolIcy A 7
Item (u) - CapItal Facihties Policy A9
Item (v) - CapItal FacilitIes Element Policy B2.
Item (w) - UtilItIes and PublIc ServIces ObjectIve BI
Item (x) - Utilities and PublIc ServIces Element PolIcy C2.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Amendment #1. After a bnef discussion, Director Collins recommended that the lme distmguishmg the
eastern portIon of Port Angeles from the western portion should be Tumwater,not Valley Street, and then
suggested that Valley Creek be utIlIzed instead. CommISSIoner Schramm agreed.
Amendment #2. After a bnef discussIOn, the CommiSSIOn provided clarificatIOn language to the use of the
word "areas" to mean comprehensive plan deSIgnations, not zomng or uses.
Amendment #3. After a bnef discussion, Director Collins corrected the recommendatIon to mclude specIfe
CIty street names consistent with the Pemnsula Regional Transportation Plan.
Amendment #4. After a bnef discussion, Including the use of "should", "shall" and "may" the CommIsSIOn
concluded that "should" was most appropnate and that InclUSIOn of the words "at its sole dIscretIOn" would
help to clanfy the city's responSIbilIty, not oblIgatIon, for utility prOVlSlon m the UGA.
Amendment #5. After a bnef diSCUSSIOn, the CommIssion deeted the words "and leadIng" m the first line. .
BeIng no further dISCUSSIOn, ChaIr Nutter reVIewed the di~ussIOn held thus far on each of the amendments.
CommIssioner Porter asked that Amendment #4 be reVISIted, adding hIS concern that the current phrasIng
may lead to expectatIons by developers or property owners, and that the City's liabilIty may mcrease asa
result.
CommISSIoner Hewms moved that the CommIssion forward a recommendatIOn of approval to the City
CounCIl on CPA 01-01, as amended, cItmg the 17 findmgs and 12 conclUSIOns, as amended and listed below:
CommISSIOner Schramm seconded the motion which passed 6-1 with CommISSIOner Porter votmg against.
CommISSIoner Porter stated hIS dIsagreement WIth Amendment #4 which may lead to increased level of
expectatIOns when usmg the word "should" and would open up the potential for lItIgation.
Findings and Conclusions regarding CPA 01-01:
Findings
1.
ComprehenSIve Plan Amendment, CPA 01-01, was submItted prior to March 31, 200 I.CP A 01-01
includes six sets of amendments to vanous sectIOns of the Port Angeles ComprehenSIve Plan. The
proposed amendments are shown In ExhibIt 1 to the staff report. Amendments Number 1-5 are
proposed by City staff and have been altered smce the onginal proposal as a result of further staff
analysis and dIscussion WIth the Planmng CommiSSIOn. Amendment Number 6 is proposed by the
ad hoc Nonmotonzed Committee.
.
2. In its deliberatIOn, the Plannmg CommISSIon reviewed the defimtions of "should" and "shall" as
.
.
.
Planmng CommISSIOn Mmutes
May 23, 2001
Page 4
provIded m the ComprehensIve Plan and recognized that "should" is permissIve, gIVmg the CIty
discretion m ItS implementation of the adopted policIes. The Planning Commission agreed that usn-g
"should" instead of "may" m the proposed amendment No.4 to UtIlIty and PublIc ServIces PolIcy
D3 does not Imply a duty on the City to extend services, except as the CIty should choose to do so
at its sole dIscretion.
3.
Amendment Number I proposes mmor changes to the CommunIty Profile Chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan m order to correct the current subarea planning nmnes wIthm the CIty limits m
addItIon to adding planning areas names for the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area. The changes
mclude adding three addItional plannmg area names and descnptions to the text, as well as reflectirg
these changes m FIgure 3 (map ofplannmg areas).
4.
Amendment Number 2 proposes addItional clarification to the CommercIal Goals and Policies of tle
Land Use Chapter ofthe ComprehensIve Plan. Goal E, Policy 6 states that new ccrnmercIaI "areas"
should not be designated along these routes. Clarification of whether "areas" ImplIes "uses" or
"zones" should be made m thIs policy to Improve its effectiveness.
5.
Amendment Number 3 proposes a change to TransportatIOn Element Goal B, PolIcy 8, m order to
Implement a recent change to RCW 36.70A, Growth Management Act (House Bill 1487, 1998)
whIch requires recognItIOn of essential public facIlities, includmg state routes, in local
comprehensIve plans, as well as a reqUIrement to reVIew potentIal impacts onto these facIlities by
local land use designations. WIthm the CIty of Port Angeles, State Route 101 andl17 are consIdered
to be essentIal public facilities, along wIth connectmg spurs to the ferry landings. Additionally, the
proposed amendment would allow for Improved connectIOn between the ComprehensIve Plan and
other adopted capital facIlIty-related plans by the additional sentence proposed for Goal B, Policy
19.
6. Amendment Number 4 proposes changes to the UtilIties and PublIc ServIces Element of the
Comprehensive Plan relatmg to the provIsion of publIc servIces and utIlitIes outsIde of the existmg
CIty limits but wIthm the deSIgnated Urban Growth Area. The proposed additIOn to Goal A, PolIcy
I, references the equItable distrIbution of publIc facilitIes to mclude the UGA. AddItIonally, the
proposed amendment to Goal D, PolIcy 3, would change a long-standing polIcy of the City of Port
Angeles to not extend City utilities (as compared to services) outsIde the CIty lImIts, and allow for
thIS to occur depending on feasIbilIty.
7. Amendment Number 5 proposes changes to the ConservatIOn Element that would reIterate the CIty'S
current practIce of partIcIpatIOn in, and support of, vanous watershed and salmon recovery efforts
some of whIch are dIrectly linked to the recent Endangered Spa:Ies Act lIstings of several salmomd
species that occur, or may occur, m streams or nearshore areas within the regulatory ]UnsdlCtIOn of
the City, as well a within ItS area of operatIons and mamtenance.
8. Amendment Number 6 reflects a proposal by the City's Nonmotonzed CommIttee who has requestro
several changes to the ComprehensIve Plan.
9.
CP AO 1-0 I was reviewed for internal consistency with the ComprehensIve Plan. The most relevant
polIcies include the Growth Management Chapter IV, partIcularly Goal A, Land Use Chapter V-
Goals A-E, TransportatIon Chapter VI- Goals A and B, Utilities and PublIc Services Chapter VII-
Goals A and D, and CapItal Facilities Chapter X- Goal A.
10. PAMC 18.04, ComprehensIve Plan ImplementatIOn and Amendment, sets forth procedures for
53
54
Planning CommISSIOn Minutes
May 23, 2001
Page 5
annual amendment process whIch Includes deadlines for applIcatIOns, reqUIrements for publIc .
hearings, deadlines for deCISIOns and critena for applIcatIOns and approvals of amendments.
Proposed amendments shall demonstrate: why existing prOVISIOns should not continue, consIstency
WIth Growth Management Act goals and specIfic requirements, complIance WIth the county-wIde
polIcIes, compliance with CapItal facilItIes and related plans, that it is in the publIc interest and
conSIstent WIth the public health, safety and welfare, and that cumulative effects have been
considered.
11. The Public Works comments included revisions to AmendIrent Number 3 and objectIOns to four of
the proposed changes In Amendment Number 6 relatmg to TransportatIon Element Policy B 15, and
CapItal FacilItIes Element, General Comments, PolICIes A7 and A9, and ObjectiveBl [Items (g), (p),
(t), (u), (w)].
12. The Department ofCommumty Development has the follOWIng recommendatIOns for Amendment
Number 6:
Approval as proposed or amended:
~
Item (a) - Transportation Element General Comments; added objectives under PolIcy A.
Item (c) - Transportation Element Policy A2
Item (e) - Transportation Element PolIcy A4
Item (g) - TransportatIon Element PolIcy B 15
Item (1) - TransportatIOn Element ObjectIve B6a
Item (j) - TransportatIOn Element ObjectIve B6d.
Item (k) - Transportation Element ObjectIve B 10.
Item(m) - UtIlIties and PublIc Services Element Policy C6.
Item (n) - UtilIties and PublIc Services Element Policy D5.
Item (0) - UtIlIties and PublIc ServIces Element PolIcy D9.
Item (q) - Capital Facilities Element Policy A3.
Item (r) - CapItal Facilities Element Policy A4.
Item (s) - CapItal FacIlities Element PolIcy A6.
.
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
Denial:
~ Item (b) - TransportatIon Element PolIcy AI.
· Item (d) - TransportatIon Element PolIcy A3.
Item (f) - TransportatIOn Element PolIcy B5
· Item (h) - TransportatIOn Element PolIcy B 16.
· Item (1) - DefillItions.
Item (p) - Capital FacIlItIes General Comments
· Item (t) - Capital Facilities PolIcy A7
· Item (u) - CapItal FacilitIes Policy A9
· Item (v) - CapItal FacilIties Element PolIcy B2.
· Item (w) - UtilItIes and Public ServIces ObjectIve Bl
· Item (x) - UtIlItIes and Public ServIces Element PolIcy C2.
13. The FIre Department had no comments on the proposal.
14.
The Clallam County Department of Commumty Development, Planning DlVlsion, has proVIded comments and
supported the proposed changes relating to extenSIOn of utilities ill Amendment #4.
.
15. A Determmation of Non Significance was issued per WAC 197-11-640 on April 24, 2001.
.
E.
F.
. G.
H.
I.
J.
K
L.
.
Planmng Commission Minutes
May 23, 2001
Page 6
16.
Notice of the public heanng on the proposed amendments to the ComprehensIve Plan was pubhshed m
accordance WIth the Port Angeles MunIcIpal Code.
17. No written public comments have been receIved at the hme of the staffreport.
Conclusions:
A. Approval of CPAOI-OI, Amendment #1 as listed in Attachment A, would result m lffiproved mtemal
conSIstency of the Comprehensive Plan.
B. Approval of CPAOI-OI, Amendment #2 as hsted m Attachment A, would result m lffiproved mtemal
consistency of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically the land use and transportatIOn chapters, and mcreased
effectiveness of these policies.
C. Approval of CPAOI-OI, Amendment #3 as hsted m Attachment A, would result local adoptIOn of recent
changes to the Growth Management Act, RCW36.70A which relate to essentIal transportation faclhties.
D. Approval of CPAOI-OI, Amendment #4 as listed m Attachment A, would result m lffiproved mtemal
conSIstency of pohcles relating to the extensIOn of urban servIces and utilities to the unmcorporated urban
growth areas, and would allow for the proVIsion of urban level of servIces to eXIsting and proposed urban-
scaled developments in the Urban Growth Area.
Approval of CP AO 1-0 I, Amendment #5 as hsted m Attachment A, would result m
Approval ofCPAOI-OI, Amendment #5 as listed in Attachment A, would result in mcreased effectIveness of
poliCIes relatmg to nonmotonzed transportatIon.
Approval of CPA 01-0 I as hsted m Attachment A, is conSIstent with Growth Management Act goals and Port
Angeles Comprehensive Plan.
Approval of CPA 01-0 I as hsted m Attachment A, IS conSIstent WIth the adopted county-wide pohcIes.
Approval of CPA 01-0 I as hsted m Attachment A, IS conSIstent WIth CapItal facIhtIes and related plans.
Approval of CPA 01-01 as listed In Attachment A, is conSIstent that It IS m the pubhc interest and conSIstent
WIth the pubhc health, safety and welfare.
The cumulatIve effects have been considered in reVIew of CP AO 1-0 1.
CP AO 1-0 1 as hsted in Attachment A, IS conSIstent with P AMC 18.04 Comprehensive Plan ImplementatIon and
Amendment.
55
.
.
.
56
.
.
.
FORT .ANGELES
lCJ FILE
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
May 23, 2001
TO:
Chair Nutter and Planning Commission
Debi Barnes, Associate Planner D~ ~V\.. (.. S>
FROM:
FILE #:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment - CPA 01-01
APPLICANT:
City of Port Angeles
OWNER:
n/a
LOCATION:
City-wide
PROPOSAL:
Text Map Amendments to Various Sections of the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Department recommends approval of CPA 01-01 as revised and shown in
Attachment B, citing the rmdings and conclusions found in Attachment A of the staff report.
PROPOSAL
CPA 01-01 includes six sets of amendments to various sections of the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan. Many of the amendments are minor changes that provide clarity or
necessary corrections to the existing Comprehensive Plan. There are a few changes that could
be considered as major policy amendments. The proposed amendments as revised are included as
Exhibit 1 to this staffreport and are further described below. Amendments #1-5 are proposed by
City staff and have been altered since the original proposal as a result of further staff analysis
and discussion with the Planning Commission. Amendment #6 is proposed by the
Nonmotorized Committee whereby the original proposal is provided in Exhibit 1; however
staff does not recommend approval of all of the proposed changes. Those amendments we
concur with (as proposed or amended) are provided in Attachment B.
57
Department ofCommwlity Development Staff Report
CPA 01.01 CityofPortAngelcs
May ...J. ",,"VVl
Page 2
~:ad~~~t #~ amendment proposes minor changes to the Community Profiie Chapter of
. "the Comprehensive Plan in order to correct the current subarea planning names within the City limits
in addition to adding planning areas names for the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area. The changes .
include adding three additional planning area names and descriptions to the text, as well as reflecting
these changes in Figure 3 (map of planning areas). Please note that upon preparation of the map
(Figure 3), we have found that a minor adjustment to the textual description of the Western and
Eastern UGA planning areas is necessary to incorporate remnant parcels near the south-central
portion of the City that are outside of the city limits but are within the UGA. The proposed changes
are shown in Attachment B and Exhibit 1 to the staff report.
Amendment #2. This amendment proposes additional clarification to the Commercial Goals and
Policies of the Land Use Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, Goal E, Policy 6 is
proposed to be changed as follows: "zones or uses that would result in a significant increase in
traffic generation or congestion that would negatively affect the flow of traffic and result in
strip commercial development should not be located along the alternative local crosstown route
or crosstown truck route". The reasons behind this amendment relate to the location of the
crosstown and crosstown and truck routes that are identified in the Transportation Services and
Facilities Plan (October 1996) and Comprehensive Plan, and land use policies and zoning
designations that are associated with these routes. Goal E, Policy 6 states that new commercial areas
should not be designated along these routes. Clarification of whether areas implies uses or zones
should be made in this policy to improve its effectiveness. In addition, the connection to other
adopted policies related to the discouragement of strip development needs to be further explained.
Amendment #3. This proposed amendment to the Transportation Element Goal B, Policy 8 would
implement a recent change to RCW 36.70A, Growth Management Act (House Bill 1487, 1998),
copy attached, which requires recognition of essential public facilities, including state routes, in local
comprehensive plans, as well as a requirement to review potential impacts onto these facilities by
local land use designations. Within the City of Port Angeles, State Route 101 and 117 are
considered to be essential public facilities, along with connecting spurs to the ferry landings.
Additionally, the proposed amendment would allow for improved connection between the
Comprehensive Plan and other adopted capital facility-related plans by the additional sentence
proposed for Goal B, Policy 19. Due to the varying processes for amendments of the capital facility
and other related plans, we do not recommend that maps or the bulk of these documents be
physically incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan at this time.
Amendment #4. The proposed amendment to the Utilities and Public Services Element of the
Comprehensive Plan relates to the provision of public services and utilities outside of the existing
City limits. Currently, some city services are provided outside the city limits, such as emergency
services (police and fire) through agreements between these providers and implemented through the
joint dispatch system. As required by the Growth Management Act, the City should plan for service
provision and annexation of the designated urban growth area. The proposed addition to Goal A,
Policy 1 references the equitable distribution of public facilities to include the UGA. Additionally,
the proposed amendment to Goal D, Policy 3 would change a long-standing policy of the City of Port
Angeles to not extend City utilities (as opposed to services) outside the city limit, and allow for this
to occur depending on feasibility. This represents a major policy change in the City's
Comprehensive Plan and could impact the City's utility services.
58
.
.
Dcpllrtmellt of Community Development Staff Repott ~ " ',,^,' :'
CPA 01-01 City of Port Angeles . '
, .'" '} ., '"
.....-J --. -- - ~
I'
Page 3
.
',:" ,
Amendment #5. The proposed policy additiQ'D: to the Conservation Element would reiterate the
City's current practice of participation in and' ~ti~port of various' watershed and saInlon recovery
efforts some of which are directly linked to the recent Endangered Species Act listings of several
salmonid species that occur, or may occur, in streams or nearshore areas within the regulatory
jurisdiction of the City, as well as its area of operations and maintenance.
Amendment #6. The City's Nonmotorized Committee has requested several changes to the
Comprehensive Plan, as well as to the Parks Plan and Transportation Services and Facilities Plan.
Only the Comprehensive Planning Policies proposed changes are being reviewed as a part of this
application. The other plans which are administered by the Parks and Public Works Departments
may be updated this year or next through a separate process.
The ad hoc Nonmotorized Committee provided a hand-edited copy of various policy amendments.
Staff typed the revisions into a 'strike and delete' format. A couple of the proposed changes were
inadvertently left out and are now accurately reflected in Exhibit 1. In general, the proposed changes
by the committee can be characterized to have the effect of strengthening the language in some of
the policies relating to nonmotorized or handicapped accessibility, or have no effect as they are
minor clarifications.
ANAL YSIS/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW
.
In addition to the recent changes in the to the Growth Management Act that have triggered some of
the amendments, the entire Comprehensive Plan was reviewed for the proposal. The most relevant
policies are provided in Attachment C to this Staff Report. Because several of the amendments
relate to using either "shall" or "should" in various policy statements, we have provided the adopted
definitions for these terms:
Shall: "Shall" means the statement is mandatory, and the action so stated is required to be
done without discretion by decision-makers. The use of "shall" in a statement indicates that
the action is imperative and ministerial.
Should: "Should" means the statement ought to be done, bu the action so stated is not
required to be done by decision-makers. The use of "should" in a statement indicates that
discretion may be used in deciding whether or not to take action. The use of "should" is
intended to give decisions-makers discretion in matters where exceptions are warranted by such
factors as physical hardships and special circumstances or when funding must be taken into
consideration.
.
Amendment #1. The proposed changes to the planning areas titles and descriptions, including a
reference map, that are a part of the Community Profile Chapter, are deemed by staff to be minor in
nature. We believe that upon annexation of properties within the UGA, that additional neighborhood
policies pertinent to those areas may result. By establishing neighborhood names and then adopting
policies specific to that neighborhood allows for simpler administration and implementation of those
area-specific policies. At some point, areas of the UGA may be further defined similarly to what
has been established in the Clallam County Port Angeles Regional Comprehensive Plan for various
identified neighborhoods in order to better recognize the individuality of certain neighborhoods, as
well as the vision and needs of citizens within them. As an alternative, the City could establish the
59
DcplU'tlnellt of Community Development Staff Report
CPA O).()) City of Port Angeles
lYIGY .J. ..,VV.l
Page 4
same neighborhood names set forth in the County plan and incorporate the policies for those
neighborhoods. Because the City's administration is currently-developing an annexation strategy
and service delivery plan, establishing more policies beyond the clarification proposed by this
amendment may not be appropriate at this time. In addition, we have not established neighborhood- .
specific policies within the City limits.
Amendment #2. Staff suggests that Land Use Policy E6 be revised to provide further clarification
of the intent of the policy in order to further distinguish the intent of this policy and provide
additional consistency with related comprehensive planning policies in order to assure that future
rezone applications for commercial zoning and future uses on commercially zoned lands along the
crosstown routes comply with this policy, as well as commercial-related uses on residentially zoned
~~. .
Examples of the uncertainty of how to properly implement the policy as written includes the
following:
.
Should a bed and breakfast or home occupation be allowed as a mixed
commercial/residential use?
Should a CUP-approved use that is commercial in nature be allowed in the RS7 zone?
Should a comprehensive plan amendment to allow additional commercial land use
designations be allowed?
Should a rezone request to change or expand the commercial designation along these route
in areas designated as commercial, residential, or transitional according to the Compo Plan
be allowed?
Are existing low density residential zoning designations along portions of these routes
conducive to new development in a high traffic area? Would medium or high density uses
be consistent with this policy?
.
.
.
.
.
As proposed, the additional language would provide guidance for conditional uses allowed in the
zones for properties along these routes, but would not necessarily provide guidance on permitted
uses for established zones, some of which may be high traffic generating uses. The proposed
amendment will also provide some guidance on future rezone requests. As suggested, changing the
word areas to zones or uses, will provide the most clarity. An alternative to forwarding a
recommendation of approval of Amendment 2 as proposed or amended would be to look at this issue
more comprehensively as a long range planning topic whereby the Planning Commission could
review the cross town routes and land use/zoning designations and policies associated with these
routes which could include a new zone for this area such as Commercial, Office. A beneficial
exercise may be to look at land use and zoning designations in the City (and UGA) by topic, such
as commercial areas, transportation routes, etc., to be followed by looking at land use/zoning from
a neighborhood perspective to further address compatibility issues.
Amendment #3. lIDs amendment can be considered as a housekeeping item and would result allow
in further compliance with the State Growth Management Act relating to transportation facilities.
Amendment #4. lIDs amendment to the City's current policy relating to the extension of urban
services outside the City limits is a major change to past practices. Recently, several businesses in
the city limits have relocated to the eastern UGA or outside the UGA. There have been conflicts and
.
60
Department ofCommunrty Development StaffRcpcirt ::,; <
CPA 01-01 City of Port Angeles
, ,,",'
;. ,..
IYla, 4.J, "'"vv..
Page 5
.
confusion during the development permit re~e~ process of proposals located in the UGA that
related to connecting to urban services or meeting level of service:standards. Upon adoption of the
proposed amendment, future urban-scaled development proposals in the UGA may be required to
extend services, such as sewer lines, prior to construction which would further the intent and
requirements of the Growth Management Act than does the current practices and procedures.
Additionally, the City and County would be able to further develop and implement the various
facility plans, as well as develop interlocal agreements related to extension of services and
performance standards that may provide additional guidance on how to effective apply this policy.
As noted previously, the proposed change to D3 is a change to longstanding practice of not extending
utilities outside of the city( limits. Though cooperative agreements and implemented through the
joint emergency services dispatch center, the City's Police and Fire Department provides services
outside the city limits on occasion and as needed. Though agreements with the PUD, water from
the City's ranney well collection system on the Elwha River is provided to PUD for distribution
outside the City limits. Though various annexations, the City and other service providers have
reached agreement about the phasing of service provision in newly annexed areas.
.
There are other policies adopted by both the City and Clallam County which state that new
development shall provide, or be provided with urban services when proposed in the UGA. Clallam
County is the review authority and decision maker for new development proposals in the UGA. As
a review agency, the City is routed a copy of the application for comments. The City's comments
generally are that urban services should be provided. However, as the provider of some of these
services and with Policy D3 stated as adopted, the City cannot extend some of these services. This
results in the applicant and the local permitting agencies being in a "pickle", as well as ineffective
policy implementation and possibly noncompliance with the Growth Management Act. As
proposed, the change in policy should help to ensure the planning for and provision of efficient urban
services to new urban-scaled developments or redevelopments that are proposed in the UGA.
Clallam County is in support of this amendment (see attached).
The proposed change to A 1 will reiterate the City's mandate of planning for the provision of services
to the City, as well as the designated UGA. The proposal to change Policy D3 from "should not"
to "should" will allow flexibility to the City as the service provider of several utilities and services
in determining how to equitably distribute these services. Staff originally thought that the word
"may" would be most effective; however "should" is defined in Comprehensive plan and reflects
the intent of why this change is proposed.
Amendment #5. The City Attorney recommended that an addition to the Comprehensive Plan be
provided which references the Endangered Species Act, as well as the City's intent for compliance
with that law. The additional policy should not have an effect onto current City practices but may
be beneficial should the City be party to any lawsuits related to protection of listed species.
Amendment #6. This amendment was submitted by the Nonmotorized Committee. For the ease
of cross-referencing, staffhas numbered the proposed revisions by the Nonmotorized Committee as
items (a) through (x) in Exhibit 1. The City Engineer/Public Works Department does not support
several of the proposed changes, as outlined in the attached memo. Specifically, they oppose the
following:
.
61
Department of Community Development Staff Report
CPA 01-01 City of Port Angeles
l"aUJ -...., .......".
Page 6
.
Item (g) - Transportation Element, Policy B15
Item (P) - Capital Facilities Element, General Commerits-:-
Item (t) - Capital Facilities Element, Policy A 7
Item (u) - Capital Facilities Element, Policy A9
Item (w) -Capital Facilities Element, Objective Bl
.
.
.
.
.
In review of the proposed changes submitted by the Committee, the Department of Community
Development concurs with the recommendations by the City Engineer to not approve the items listed
above, and also recommends that the following proposed changes are not approved:
. Item (b) - Transportation Element Policy A 1. Should is the preferred wording and is
sufficient for this policy. As an example, drinking fountains should not be a required
element of the City's transportation system.
. Item (d) - Transportation Element Policy A3. Should is sufficient
. Item (e) - Transportation Element Policy A4. Okay as written.
. Item (f) - Transportation Element Policy B5. Should is sufficient
. Item (h) - Transportation Element Policy B 16. Should is sufficient as shared parking may
not be reasonable in all situations.
. Item (1) - Definitions. The proposed definitions provided in W A Department of
Transportation's design guidelines, as well as federal laws and guidelines regarding
handicapped.
. Item (x) - Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C2. The Transit Service has its own
guidelines and requirements to address handicapped and nonmotorized.
Staff concurs with the following proposed amendments and recommends alterations to several more
items as listed below:
.
. Item (a) - Transportation Element General Comments. Add nonmotorized and Objectives
A(I-3)
. Item (c) - Transportation Element Policy A2. Okay as proposed.
. Item (i) Transportation Element Objective B6a. Nonmotorized includes pedestrian.
. Item G) Transportation Element Objective B6d. Slight re-wording is suggested.
. Item (k) Transportation Element Objective B9. The proposed wording is unnecessary and
the current language should remain. Adding Objective 810 regarding implementation is
appropriate.
. Item (m) - Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C6. Okay as proposed.
. Item (n) - Utilities and Public Services Element Policy D5. Slight modification of proposed
wording is recommended.
. Item (0) - Utilities and Public Services Element Policy D9. Adding transportation is
preferred.
. Item (q) - Capital Facilities Element Policy A3. Bikeways and pedestrian ways should not
be deleted; add transportation nonmotorized.
. Item (r) - Capital Facilities Element Policy A4. Add nonmotorized.
. Item (s) - Capital Facilities Element Policy A6. Leave bikeway and pedestrian in; add
nonmotorized.
. Item (v) - Capital Facilities Element Policy B2. Okay as written.
.
62
Department of Community Dm:lopmcnt StaffRcport
CPA Ol..()l City ofPon Angeles
" ,
; <,'.'
, ~ , '
Mlly~,"UVl
Page 7
c_:'
~~ ,
Staffreview of this amendment did not include an assessment of the consistency of the terminology
used throughout the Comprehensive Plan. ,. - -
. DEPARTMENT I AGENCY COMMENTS
The Fire Department had no comments on the proposal. The Public Works Department
opposed 5 items listed as a part of Amendment #6. The City Attorney provided comments that
some of the proposed changes should not be considered to be minor changes. Clallam County
Department of Community Development provided comments in support of the change to
providing utility services outside the city limits. See copies attached.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City's State Environmental Policy Act Responsible Official issued a Determination of
NonSignificance and Adoption of Existing Environmental Document for the proposal per
WAC 197-11-640 on April 24, 2001.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments have been received. Notice of the public hearing on the proposed
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan was published in accordance with the P AMC.
RECOMMENDATION
.
Staff recommends approval of the amendments proposed as listed in Attachment B to this staff
report. Some of the revisions shown in Attachment B are different than what was proposed in
Exhibit 1, the original application. Findings and conclusions in support of the amendments listed
in Attachment B are provided in Attachment A.
3 ;.-.t r' .~e,R
.Attae
Exhibit 1 - Application for CPA 01-01
Exhibit 2 - Comments from City EngineerlPublic Works Dept.
Exhibit 3 - Comments from City Attorney
Exhibit 4 - Comments from Clallam County
~-;.t...b;t) - ~~( -n..--- ~"""b~-Y" -L~ ~1~C1Il ~...'.ft~
.
63
.
.
.
64
.
.
.
65
~iiJtidJ~ON~ . .. --- .'; EXHIBIT I
-~.~~.'.~i~5Q~ CITY OF PORT ANG~LES .;,::.:r. ~I-~J
:SEP A Review: : $150 '.ReceiYeAi by:
Total: 5600. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
APPLICATION
PLEASE NOTE: Deadlinefor applications is March 31st of each year.
APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION:
Applicant: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Address: P.O. Box 1150. Port Anaeles. WA 98362 Daytime phone #: (36m 417-4750
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXTILAND USE MAP CHANGE: (Note specific Plan
policy citations.)
kxt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to include: providine: corrections and updates to the references
to plannine: area names. the allowance for utilitv extensions outside of the Citv limits. habitat protection policies for
listed or threatened species under the Endane:ered Species Act. cross-references to related adopted plans. and
implementation of recent chane:es to the Growth Manae:ement Act relating to the recoe:nition and coordinated
plannine: of transportation facilities. (See attached)
.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE:
See attached
SIGNATURES:
Applicant:
J have read this application in its entirety and believe the information herein presented to be true and correct.
~l &>> J\tS
Signature
Date ? ~ 0 I
Attachments
T:\CP\2001\appl.wpd
.
.
.
.
S/~/c> \
ProfX*d Comprehennw Plan A_ndme1lls 200/
City of Port Anplu
Page /
Amendment #1.
The following minor changes to the Community Profile Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan are
proposed in order to correct the current subarea planning names within the City limits, in
addition to adding planning area names for the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area which will
allow for easier referencing.
[Note: New text is shown as underlined text, and deleted text is shown as over-stricken text.]
n. COMMUNITY PROFILE
Land Use
The Comprehensive Plan divides the City into 50! planning areas. For the purpose of
description, the individual planning areas are identified as the Harbor, Northwest, Southwest,
North Central, md South Central, East. Eastern Urban Growth Area and Western Urban
Growth Area planning areas. These areas are located on Figure 3 and are described as
follows.
The Harbor planning area contains the Coast Guard Station, the Port and Salmon Club boat
ramps, Ediz Hook Park, and Daishowa Mill on Ediz Hook. The historic downtown and
waterfront are also essential parts of this subarea. The boat haven marina, log export terminal,
the K-Ply mill, the Coho Ferry terminal, City Pier, and Rayonier Mill line the waterfront.
Entertainment activities (movie theater, bookstores, antique shops, galleries, and restaurants)
abound within the pedestrian oriented central business district.
The Northwest planning area covers the western edge of town lying beyond Tumwater Creek
and north of the airport. This area is comprised largely of older homes. There is a
commercial area serving the residents along C Street. A pocket of industrial/commercial
activities are located along the Tumwater Truck Route/Highway 101 junction. This area of
town has limited access because of the Tumwater Creek ravine and the bluffs. It also has the
largest segment of undeveloped residential land within the current City limits.
The Southwest planning area includes Fairchild International Airport, the Clallam County
Fairgrounds and Lincoln Park. Industrial development is located at the airport industrial park.
A few homes lie within the City limits along Lower Elwha Road, but otherwise this planning
area contains predominantly industrial and park (recreation) land uses.
The North Central planning area is the older more dense portion of town: It is an area divided
by Valley, Peabody and EnnislWhite's Creek ravines. It contains all of the municipal
buildings and Clallam County building and courthouse. The commercial uses along Lincoln
Street provide community shopping opportunities. Recreation is provided by a number of
67
p-
~
6
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
PUBLIC WORKS
~
-.:
.
. .'
, .! I
.
,
.
.'.
::I:
l "
.,.-
_0'-
.
,.-
...:- ii
.
.. 4",
...I~ # ~
. '.
. . ~ .'.1
.# ..:. .',
~. -. . ,
i." ./1-, .
..~ .1 ,.. ..
.. ~.I. ,....
. ~ "
\ l ,0ili:.'1
. .' ~ '.'
.,.. ~
"
to-
CD
W
~
<
C!J
:;)
,
~
aJ
-.
i
.
__I
.
.
.
SCALE
o
I
I
2400
4800
I
PLANNING AREA MAP
correction
LN ~
.
.
.
Propo&ed COmpnheMlW! Plan Amendments 2001
Clly of Port Angeles
Page 2
parks and the Peninsula Public Golf Course. Much of the city's multifamily housing is within
this planning area.
The South Central planning area is the area of town with newer homes, on larger lots. This is
where the street pattern changes from traditional blocks to cul-de-sacs. Many views of Port
Angeles Harbor and the Strait of Juan de Fuca are available. The Port Angeles High School
lies within this planning area. The Olympic National Park Headquarters and Visitors Center is
along the Heart of the Hills Road. M the castcAIi edge oftbis subareA ib gAG reniMttla
Community CoHcge.
The East planning area is the area of town easterly of Race Street. This area has a mix of
older homes and newer residential subdivisions and development as well as 'Corrion of the
main commercial corridor. Marine views from up,per elevations are possible. along with
mountain views. This plannine: area includes Peninsula Colle~e facilities and Peninsula Golf
Club.
The Eastern Urban Growth Area is the area east of the city limits. Policies for this area are
adoDted bv Clallam County as a Dart of the Port Ane:eles Ree:ional Comprehensive Plan.
The Western Urban ~owth Area is the area west of the city limits. Policies for this area are
adopted bv Clallam County as a part of the Port An~eles Regional Comprehensive Plan.
This includes an update to Figure 3 - Planning Areas
Amendment #2.
The following proposed amendment to the Land Use Element relates to future commercial land use
designations and land uses along the proposed alternative crosstown transportation routes. As
proposed, non-traffic generating commercial uses could be located in these areas. As an
alternative, the land use map designation along these routes could be evaluated.
V. LAND-USE ELEMENT
Commercial Goals and Policies
Goal E, Policy 6.
I
New commercial areas that would result in increased traffic generation
or congestion should not be located along the alternate local crosstown
route or the crosstown truck route.
69
Propo#d Comprelrensrve PIDn A_ndmenls 200 J
CIty of Port Angeles
Page 3
.
Amendment #3
The following amendments to the Transportation Element will result in improved connection
between the Comprehensive plan and other adopted capital facility-related plans. Also, the
amendments will implement a recent change to the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70,
relating to clarifying language for the recognition of certain transportation facilities that are of
state-wide significance.
VI. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Goal B.
To improve circulation patterns across and within the community.
Policies
8.
The City should shall coordinate with the State De,pt. ofTrans,portation. County.1s
and the Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization transportation
planning efforts. This includes recognition of SR 101 and SR 117. alom! with
connecting spurs from each to the ferrY landings as transportation facilities of
state-wide significance which are declared essential public facilities under the
Growth Management Act. Review of potential impacts onto these facilities and
LOS standards will be inc01:porated with future updates to the City's
Comprehensive Plan, as required bv the Act.
.
19. The development of the City's comprehensive service and facilities plan for streets,
bikeways, pedestrian walkways, and the overall transportation system, and regional
transportation plans should all be consistent. These plans. as adopted and hereafter
amended. are inc01:porated herein.
Amendment #4
The following proposed amendments to the Utilities and Public Services Element of the
Comprehensive Plan will result in increased flexibility for the City to plan for and provide services
to properties in the Urban Growth Area
VIT. UTILITIES AND PUBUC SERVICES ELEMENT
Goal A
.
70
.
.
.
PropORd CompreMlUrvt Plan Ame1tdmenls 2001
City of Port Angeles
Page 4
A. To provide or allow the opportunity for services and facilities which enhance the quality
of life for Port Angeles citizens of all ages, characteristics, needs, and interests.
Policies
1. Public facilities should be equitably distributed across the City's planning areas
includinl! desilZIUlted Urban Growth Areas.
D. To provide utility services in an efficient and cost-effective manner.
Policies
3. The City should Dot may extend urban services outside the City without
annexation.
Amendment #5
The proposed amendment to the Conservation Element of the Comprehensive Plan will provide .
further acknowledgment of the City's participation in various watershed and salmon recovery
efforts, as well as its commitment to appropriate preservation measures of habitat for listed or
threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act.
IX. CONSERVATION ELEMENT
Goal B. To protect and enhance the area's unique physical features, its natural, historical,
archaeological, and cultural amenities, and the overall environment.
22. The Citv will continue participating and leading in various watershed planning and
salmon recoverv efforts. The City will incorporate aDDr01;>riate measures for the
protection of habitat for listed or threatened species under the federal Endangered
Species Act when Drovidin~ public services and administering land use and
development re~ations.
Amendment #6
The City's Ad Hoc Nonmotorized Committee has requested that the following changes be made to
the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan related to nonmotorized uses:
VI. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
71
Proposed CompnMIUJYe Plan Ame1lli1Mms 200/
CIty of PorI Angeles
Pagr 5
General Comments
(new paragraph)
.
The City will be an active partner in the development of the Discovery Trail which passes through
and along kev oarts of its Park. Street pedestrian. and non-motorized transportation svstems and
facilities. The City's Ciruculation Plan acknolwedl!es that such a Regional Trail system serves many
functions: it is a means of inter city communication. a wav to oromote economic development. a (Q. \
means to promote a healthv lifestyle and even a way to provide future utility right-of-ways. J
The City's Comorehensive Plan also acknowledges that on~oing efforts to immove or orovide access
to Vallev. Tumwater. Peabody. Ennis. White's Creeks and the development of the Foothills Trail
Svstem will cause additional changes in this plan.
As an active partner. the City will maintain a Citizen's Advisory Group and will facilitat
communication with Clallam County. the City of SeQuim. the DNR and other public and private
groups developing: alternative Transportation Systems.
Goal A. To develop a coordinated, multimodal transportation system which serves all areas of the
City and all types of users in a safe, economical and efficient manner.
Policies
1. Pedestrian and bicycle paths, bike racks, storage facilities, drinking fountains, and benches
shonld shall be an integral and accessible part of the circulation system.
2.
The safety of non-motorized modes of transportation shonld shall be a primary consideration
in the circulation system. Adequate sidewalks, crosswalks, hk.ydc. paths bikeways, and
handicapped access should be provided.
3.
The collector arterial streets and local access streets shotdd shall serve primarily local traffic
with special emphasis on safety for pedestrian traffic.
4.
A multimodal and non motorized. handicapoed :transPortation center should include but not
be limited to public transit, commercial bus, taxi, ferry, and airport shuttle services and should
be located in or near the downtown cor and public transportation system.
Goal B. To improve circulation patterns across and within the community.
Policies
72
ct
(s)
lJ)
~)
.
.
.
.
, "
Propo#d CompreMIUJVe Pltm AmendmerrJs 2001
CIty of Port Angeles
PQ~6
3. The City should facilitate the development of a crosstown truck route with
improvements which provide full access to Highway 117 to and from Highway 101
and improvements to the Lauridsen Boulevard Bridge over Peabody Creek and the
intersections of Lauridsen Boulevard at Race Street and Highway 101.
4. The City should facilitate an additional route for local crosstown traffic along
Lauridsen Boulevard across White's Creek ultimately connecting with Highway 101.
In association with these two proposed crosstown routes the City should shall require / ~ \
adequate mitigation measures to reduce any negative impacts on existing land uses, l.j"" ..J
including buffer areas, pedestrian sidewalks and crossings, bikeways, and reduced
speeds.
5.
6. The City should facilitate the development of an alternate local crosstown route with
improvements which provide full access at Highway 101 and Highway 117 (the
Tumwater Truck Route). Improvements should be made to the intersections of
Lauridsen Boulevard at Lincoln and Peabody Streets. Improvements should be made
to the Lauridsen Boulevard bridge over Peabody Creek. Improvement should be made .
for the development of a crossing over White's Creek.
15.
Road improvements should shall provide for alternate modes of transportation.
16.
Parking requirements should shall make allowances for shared parking facilities.
17. The City should assist the public transit system by providing convenient access
between neighborhoods, residential, commercial, and industrial areas and between
major community facilities.
18. Police and fire protection should be a key factor in residential subdivision street
designs and circulation patterns.
19. The development of the City's comprehensive service and facilities plan for streets,
bikeways, pedestrian walkways, and the overall transportation system, and regional
transportation plans should all be consistent.
Objectives
1.
Secondary and primary arterials will be designed with an appropriate balance
for moving through traffic and providing local access to uses that front on
these arterials. In commercially zoned areas, policies for consolidating access
l{)/
lh)
73
Proposed CompnnelUl1Ie Pion A_nd1nents 200/
City of Port Angeles
Page 7
and providing for joint access and maintenance of driveways would be
considered.
2. The City will develop a variety of funding techniques available for new
development projects to provide mitigation for transportation impacts
resulting from new development or redevelopment. The funding techniques
could include but are not limited to developer provided right-of-way and
partial improvement to the street along the frontage of their property,
establishing a road development or trip end fee, use oflatecomers agreements,
waivers of protest to the formation of LID's and bonding. The intent would
be to match the technique to the development circumstance in order for the
City to fund the transportation improvements that ensure concurrency.
Whichever approaches are taken, they must be equitable and proportional to
the level of impact.
6. The City will consider a variety of traffic management alternatives to increase
the existing street system capacity and implement appropriate options as
feasible. Such alternatives may include:
a.
Takimz into account pedestrianlnonmotorized use:
a12.
Remove parking at controlled intersections to provide auxiliary turn
lanes to increase capacity;
be. Remove parking during selected periods of the day (i.e., noon and PM
peak hour) to create additional through land capacity;
&/
.
lL)
.
Modify signal timing to respond to seasonal and/or daily peak traffic lJ-)
periods to favor major flows and expand the number of signals that are
coordinated as part of a system to provide enough time for a
handicapped citizen to cross when simal button is pushed.
,
7. The City will coordinate with the County, RTPO, and State and Federal
agencies in the study of a possible future US 101 corridor including the Heart
of the Hills Parkway and Coastal Corridor concepts. East of Race Street, the
alternate local crosstown route (along Lauridsen Boulevard) will not be
considered as a future US 101 corridor.
9. 11.", City lVill Gstablish A tAsk foICG to develop a City-wid, bilocwa, l K)
.
74
.
Proposed Compnlumsrve Plan Amendments 200/
Clly of Port Angeks
Page 8
uwtCJ. plan. The City will facilitate the implementation of the City
wide nonmotorized and s.pecialized transportation master plan. The
Nonmotorized Advisory Committee will continue to review new
pI'Qiects and to call attention to needed improvements.
It is requested that under the "DEFINITIONS" Section the following definitions should be added:
m. DEFINITIONS
Nonmotorized: A broad term anplied to all forms of equipment that are basically human
powered. Some types of nonmotorized equinment mav also be used on the roadways at times.
Tvnical examples of nonmotorized eauipment would include bikes with 1 to 4 wheels. in
styles including road. off road. recumbent. and BMX and stunt or performance styles or tvnes
Some other forms of recreation eauipment may be considered as trans,portation depending
upon use and s.peed. Examples include in-line skates. skate boards. and scooters.
Handicapped s.pecialized: The term is applied to eauipment such as wheelchairs. walkers.
bikes. and scooters whose main function is to enable a person to have a wider range of
movement. Thev mayor mav not have electric motors to move or help move the equipment.
. VII. UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT
.
Goal
C. To provide safe, clean, usable, and attractive public facilities which enhance the cultural,
educational, economic, recreational, and environmental attributes of the City.
Policies
(lJ
6.
The City should place special emphasis on the recreational needs of the youth of the ( 11\I\)
community includine: bicycle safety education programs. \!. r I
Goal
D. To provide utility services in an efficient and cost-effective manner.
Policies
5.
The City should promote the joint use of transportation rights-of-way and utility
corridors to provide all forms of nonmotorized and s.pecialized mobility for all citizens
(y1)
75
Propo#d CompreMrulVe PItm .A_ru:lmena 2001
City of Port Angeles
Page 9
inc1udinlZ handicapoed.
6. The City should promote coordination between road construction and utility
installation.
9.
The City should identify lands useful for public purposes, such as utility corridors,
landfills, sewage treatment facilities, nonmotorized and soecialized trans,portation
recreation, schools, and other public uses.
10. Planning for utility services shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the
Capital Facilities Element.
11. New development should be served by sanitary sewers.
x. CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT
General Comments
.
(0)
The Capital Facilities Element consists of two parts. The first part is the listing of goals and policies
regarding the City's provision of urban services and its planning of capital improvements. The second
part is the Annual Capital Facilities Plan which is adopted separately from the Comprehensive Plan .
but is included as part of the Plan as an attachment.
The Comprehensive Plan defines urban services in its definition section which includes a listing of
the following services and facilities which should be available in an urban environment:
· Surface transportation facilities;
· Water facilities;
· Sewer facilities;
· Stormwater facilities;
· Solid waste facilities;
· Parks and recreational facilities;
· Nonmotorizedlhandicap,ped access:
· Emergency services (police, fire and medical response);
· Public service buildings;
· Public schools facilities; and
. Regional facilities (libraries, corrections, and mass transit).
Policies
3. The City shall develop individual comprehensive service and facility plans for the
76
If)
.
.
.
.
Proposed ComprehelUJYe Pion Amendments 200]
CIty of Port Angeles
Page ]0
following utilities and/or services:
streets, hhwaJs and PCdc,.,t.,;Au waB..ways.nonmotorized with handicapjled (a)
accessibility: ~()
water system,
sanitary sewer system,
electrical system,
parks and recreation services, and
emergency services (police, fire, and medical response).
.
.
.
.
.
.
4. The City should co-operate with the appropriate private and/or public agencies to
develop individual comprehensive service and facility plans for each of the following
utilities and/or services:
*
*
*
telecommunications,
schools,
transportation (air, marine and public transit), nonmotorized/handicapjled and
solid waste collection and disposal.
6.
The comprehensive service and facility plan for streets, bikt.\'IfAJ5, and flc.d"miau
nonmotorizedJhandican~d walkways shall also ,include specific actions and
requirements for bringing into compliance any street facilities that fall below the
required level of service, including demand management strategies which encourage
reduced reliance on single occupant vehicle trips and encourage use of alternate
modes of transportation such as the bicycles, walkways, and transit riding with
incentive programs for and from local businesses.
7.
The comprehensive service and facilities plan for streets, nonmotorized/handicapped
bikewAJS, aOOpcdcstliAll walkways should include a future US 101 corridor to meet
long-term local and regional transportation needs.
9.
The City shall require concurrency at the time of development for the following
utilities and services including ADA requirements:
.
.
.
.
streets,
water service,
sanitary sewer service, and
electrical service.
Goal
lr)
(5)
lb)
~u)
77
78
ProptUed COmpnMlU11Ie PIDn .AmelllbMntr 2001
City of Pori .Angeles
Page 1 I
B. To provide urban streets and utilities at minimum levels of service for all city residents and
the general public.
Policies
2.
Development on all arterial streets and any other streets identified as school walking
routes shall include pedestrian sidewalks and nonmotorized access.
Objective
.
Lv)
1.
The City will develop and adopt design standards for street, nonmotorized. ruJ I )
water, sewer, and stormwater facilities. '(
Goal
C. To provide urban services at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the general
public.
Policies
The City should not approve any development that will not be served with adequate
nonmotorized transit service as determined in the comprehensive service and
facilities plan for transportation within six years from the time of development. ..
2.
.
o
~
~
~
~RT ANGELES ...
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
/! EXHIBIT Z
'--- -
, PCr1;-:-'-7-. -....--
- PlANNING"....::....::." -- .
DEP/'Rr~lEMT I
~
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
DATE:
April 12, 2001
SUBJEcr:
Debi Barns, Associate Planner
Gary W. Kenw~, P .E., Deputy Director of Engineering/City Engineer
Comments regarding proposed amendments to Comprehensive Plan and TSFP.
To:
FROM:
Public Works has reviewed the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan prepared by DCD
transmitted by your memo of April 6, 200 I and has the following comments:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Amendment #3
The added text regarding highways of state-wide significance in section VI, Goal B. Policies 8 which
reads "This includes recognition of SR 101 includin~ the spur to the ferry dock. and SR 117 as
transportation -----" should be revised to read This includes recognition of SR 101 and SR 117.
along with connecting sours from each to the ferrv landin~s. as transportation ------" .
Amendment #6
Transportation Element
Page 65
We oppose the proposed replacement of should with shall in item 15. This would require that all road
improvements provide alternate modes of transportation. The City cannot afford to meet this
requirement for all road improvements.
Page 83.
We oppose the proposed inclusion of non-motorized/handicapped access as a separate urban service.
Non-motorized facilities/handicapped access are included in other listed urban services and should
not be listed as a separate service.
Page 85.
We oppose the proposed changes to items 7 & 9. In item 7, replacing bikeways and pedestrian
walkways with non-motorized/handicap walkways serves no purpose. Per ADA regulations, all
pedestrian walkways are required to be handicap accessible and need not be listed as a separate
criteria. In item 9 we do not need to add including ADA requirements. As noted above, ADA
regulations require ADA access to be provided. This is not a separate or added concurrency
requirement that should be noted.
Page 87.
We oppose the proposed addition of non-motorized to the list of facilities that the City will develop .
and adopt design standards for. These are already included in our transportation standards and the
WSDOT Design that we utilize in our project designs.
80
\ '- ~ ~ ~ ,
, ~ ~ 1'" " ..:-
. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AND FACILITIES PLAN (TSFP)
.
.
We have reviewed the TSFP comments and will keep them on file for when the TSFP is updated. We
have no current schedule for the update. Many of the comments were minor corrections and not
critical to interpretation. However, in the section on Pedestrian Facilities, Page 5-17, we strongly
object to the proposal that new roadway facilities will be subject "to review by non.motorized
advisory board and this includes Bike, Pedestrian, handicapped safety education". We do not need an
addition layer of approval for projects. The non-motorized advisory committee, as created, is advisory
only and not a review board. We appreciate the committees efforts and will consider their input in our
projects. It was further proposed in the same section to add "and ADA " to our standards. This is
unnecessary since ADA requirements are mandated to be included in all facilities. In the section on
Bicycle Facilities, Page 5-17, the addition of "and/or when recommended by the non-motorized
advisory committee" is acceptable and in line with their role.
Please call me if you have any questions regarding our comments.
N \PWKS\ENGINEER\PLNCRSP\cmprev. wpd
81
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
EXHffiIT .3
fD) rn @ ~ n ~.-
lJlJl APR 1 0 ~I
I
L-
:-- :..'.....- -I
.
~ORT ANGELES
: r' ,,.....\
- --~-
MEMO
Date:
April 10, 2001
CITY ATTORNEY
To:
Debi Barnes, Associate Planner
Craig Knutson
City Attorney
[4531]
From:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
Re:
Proposed Comnrehensive Plan Amendments
Dennis Dickson
Sr. Assistant City
Attorney
[4532]
Candace Kathol
Legal Assistant
[4576]
This is in response to your request for comments on the comprehensive plan
amendments being proposed by the Department of Community Development. In
my opinion, all of the developments are not minor, particularly Amendments #4,
#5, and #6. The most significant amendment is #4, which could have a significant
effect on future annexations and growth in the urban growth area.
Please let me know if you would like to discuss this further.
Jeanie DeFrang
AdministratIve Assistant
[4530]
.
DIana Lusby
Administrative Assistant
[4530]
CDK:dl
C \DMEMO\CK-bames wpd
.
82
"':Li EXHIBIT I.L
DJ ---I--
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN'l
,.
.- III
.
May 3, 2001
CLALLAM COUNTY COURrnOUSE
223 E. FOURrnST., P.O. Box 863
~ E GELES, WA 98362-0149
o IE D \'r7(~) 111) 000. FAX (360) 417-2443
. - 72001 III!
COMMUNITY DEVELOpr: ; ~
Mr. Brad Collins, AlCP
City of Port Angele~
Department of Community Development
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, W A 98362
Re: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments - 2001
Dear Brad:
I have reviewed the proposed amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan
which I received April 26, 2001. Most of these involve minor changes to the language in .
your plan which do not involve county issues. However, I do want to indicate our
concurrence in support for the proposed change which will allow provision of utility
service outside the city limits. This will be a helpful change as the City and County
examine how best to serve citizens and property within the Port Angeles UGA.
If you have any questions or comments, please let me know.
Sincerely,
An~~~
Planning Director
c: Bob Martin
Board of Clallam County Commissioners
.
84
.
.
.
85
PORi ANlil:ltS CITY PLANNINli I.H:P1.
~Ec'r, ~ /.?- ~h L_._..~.__. --:I
i"\ ..t: ------.- ~Hlerr *5
Non-Motorized Advisory Committee
Response 10 Staff recommendations 10 Comprehensive Plan Revisions
.
These responses were developed at our regutar meettng on May 15, using the draft
recommendations from the staff review.
In submtttmg the original request for changes to the Transportation Sections of the City
of Port Angeles's Comprehensive Plan, the Non-Motorized groups' intent was to bring
the Comprehenstve p~ -up to -date and to add emphastS to -strengthen, and to add
additional -language to support non-motorized and -handicapped access within the
City. We have -wanted to do this review for several-years and this was the first tnne that
we caught the review cycle in time to get this done. This effort resulted in 23 requests
for changes.
At our -May 15 meettng we -had the help of Jim Mah.um m devetoptng the responses to
the staff review. As is often the case -in review of written -words only, the staff and the
Advisory -Committee were focused on dtfferent parts of the statement or had different
meanings for the text. Once both Mr. Maltum and -we clarified the meanings or intent
we are m substantial agreement with most of the 'staff responses, 1-8o-f the 23
o"'lMQes.
The detailed response follows: The -letters refer to the hand -written letters added in the
right margtn of the Comprehensive Plan. See -Exhibit #1, pages 5-11 .
Staff recommends approval
We appreciate the support of the staff in accepting our suggestions as ~ed in
Attachment A, page 2. Those -include -items marked with hand -written letters as follows
{ a,e, i, i, ie, m,n, o,q, 1', S, & v) Some items have been reworded; the rewrite-is
accepted.
Staff recommends denial-: and we agree with them
items { d, f,-h, p,u & x) With changes to current f and one new item g.
item f We would Hke a change in wordtng to make dear that number 5 (ttem f ) is m
reference to numbers 3, and 4 just above ft. if this is so, we agree -with keeping should
and not changtng it to sha.1.
ltem 9 -we would ttke the have a new entry after #15 To read New roads shall be
evaluated for the ability to accommodate alternate modes of transportation. Leaving
item 15 as written.
item h We read the term shared to include more than cars, that bikes shall also
"share" parking. Term "shared" as used here refers to two or more buildings using the
same parking lots at different times. However, we feel that space for non-motorized
parking should be included in oarking olans for new.buildinas or developments. We .
do not know where to place this request. Co'(lAf)\cWL/oJ
86
.
.
.
:J(~ '
"
}. "
v "~ ~~
Items the Non-Motorized stifl request be changed in the
Comprehensive Plan (Items b, e, -I, 1, & w )
item (b) Policies: That such items as pedestrian and bike paths, bike racks, storage
facntties, drinking fountains, and benches -shaH be an integral and accessible part
of the circulation system. Comment: While some items may be -part of uParksn or some
other division of the Comprehensive plan, these amenities often allow people to really
use public spaces and pedestrian and bike paths. To have a POLICY that states that
some -wtll not be accessible is -self-defeating.
item ( e ) Policies: WIlHe mufti modal tncfudes non-motorized, handicapped in most
formal definitions of -the term multi modal, -we -were trying to make -sure that aU people
who are connected with the development of such a center mcluding those -who are not
professionals understand that multi modal -includes more than -cars and buses.
{ Not a must have -item for NMAC; we see this as a double-check item}
ftem ( f) -Definitions Non-motorized. While the staff plans -on using existing Federal
and State definitions and -WOOT design guidelines, there is no summary or appendix
which details what they are included -in the Comprehensive Plan. The general
description or definition from the WOOT or Federal guidefines needs to be -included
here.
Once more we -were trying to -give examples of -the types of equipment that may weU
be used as non-motorized transport, including uncommon types of btkes or btkes -with
electric motor-so For anyone -working -on such things as Transportation -Centers, Parks,
walkways -into faeitities or -par-kmg or storage for -non-motorized equipment, -knowledge
of the wide range of equipment types would be very important.
With the Comm1ssions permission we -wouid suggest the following changes to be
made starting -in -tine 3 Tvoical-examoles............... bikes with 2 or more wheels.
Bicvcle styles include road. off road. recumbent. BMX. stunt. and oerformance.
item -t Whife -on the surface -it may seem that Highway 101 does not seem to fit into
non-motorized facittties; -if a new -route for 101 were to be bum -within the city the abiHty
of users of non-motorizedfhandicapped equipment to cross over or under a new 101
would be of prime concern to us. Thus -we wish this concept to be included in the
Comprehensive Plans. This may not be the place for this concept but it should be
included m the Plan somewhere.
item w Not all non-motorized facilities are connected with streets or roadways, so we
wish to once more make this -point clear.
87
'7
6t~$
88
New Request and a Comment
.
A member of the Advisory group (Kathy Seven Williams) has sent in a new request
based on her recent experiences and the reading of our requested changes following
the last meeting. The new request is for a polley change.
She requests, We need a city policy that provides for safe pedestrian passage
along pedestrian lines of travel. It also must include a policy that no obstruction of
pedestrian ways will be allowed, by signage, parking, or other barriers not specifically
placed to reroute pedestrian travel for their safety.
This blockage of walkways has become a issue during much of the current
construction. Other specific examples include the crosswalks near the ferry landing,
and the parkinglright turn lanes at 8th and Peabody.
Policy section, New number to be added
604/ A-
s. The City will insure that oedestrian routes are maintained in aJ1fsafe an accessible
manner for all during construction of any kind - roadway. sidewalk or building. The
City will also insure that no obstruction of oedestrian ways will be allowed by signage.
parking. or other barriers not specifically placed to route or reroute pedestrian travel for
their safety.
.
A comment on the current design standards. We feet that some flexibility needs to be
built into the current standards now in use to allow bike lanes or bike routes to be
marked or signed on parts of our major streets which are a little undersized for the
current standards now 10 use. We understand that a review of this issue is underway.
We support such a review and are willing to meet with any of the Ctty staff involved.
Future Goals of the Non Motorized Advisory Committee inctude a review of the poHcies
and long range goals of the Parks and Recreation Department. We would appreciate
notice of when Parks and Recreatton undertakes a review cycle.
]jS;;J1~~
Gary Gleason
Chairman for 2001
.
Infoqnation provided to City Council by Linda Nutter,
Plan&\\g Commissioner & Non-Motorized Adv. Comm.
member
BIKES CTS buses ,- -
on ., o___'\. .. .' ,. .. thru '2000,:::;,':.
" ,. '.
2000 99 2000
route rt1l 2.QOO 1m 19.9.a ~ % change ~ bike/tnp bike/mile Illim.s
Joyce 10 725 543 479 345 34% 2,928 0.25 0.010 69,638
Forks 14 901 753 704 805 20% 4,688 0.19 0.004 253,219
LaPush 15 125 69 223 70 81% 1,716 0.07 0.004 29,840
Clallam Bay 16 327 222 224 397 47% 2,604 0.13 0.003 111,102
Forks Shuttle 17 35 13 0 0 169% 1,125 0.03 0.003 13,630
College/Plaza 20 1123 722 671 235 56% 13,416 0.08 0.029 38,228
College Connection 21 48 64 72 38 -25% 940 0.05 0.008 6,016
lincoln/Peabody 22 833 876 626 233 -5% 12,884 0.06 0.024 34,144
Cherry HIli 24 1186 961 733 261 23% 13,097 0.09 0.026 46,118
Westslde 26 2395 1931 1,356 396 24% 11~139 0.22 0.029 82,147
HIghway Commuter 30 7859 7423 7,406 4,827 6% 11,980 0.66 0.040 198,168
Old Olympic Hwy 31 38 41 34 27 -7% 1,818 0.02 0.001 25,632
SeqUlm Shuttle 40 15 21 14 13 -29% 4,699 0.00 0.001 27,465
Dungeness 44 110 59 16 159 86% 1,818 0.06 0.005 20,086
Diamond POint 52 211 301 595 142 -30% 1,818 0.12 0.008 28,086
15,931 13,999 13,153 7,948 14% 85,545 0.19 0.016 983,519
2000 15,932 Bike Rack Use, by Year
1999 13,999 18,000
1998 13,153 16,000 ; ~-t' ~~?-~~'; I,~ ~, ~ 'J:"'!..#' ~ : ~::~- ;,-~~~_~'~':_:.' .f:;~~A};:5~~f.;.; _~l ;:~~~\(_:~~t*~~~ ;i; i
,,,..,.., "....,'",.. """'''''.'''''
1997 7,948 14,000 ......-..' -1..1 _ ~l-- ;; ...1__ ~ -~: ..-:,1..:'. ;,~-'~~,~:.~~~ r~~~)~~,~ ;:o~;~'; .' ~ ~t~.:,. 'r~ ~:.J,
,~:!f:t" ~,.~~~~:I~. ~.~~J:r ~i;~:i"'~~~i,~~~~~ - t.~r~~~;."~~:~
1996 9,217 12,000
.~:::~ ~D;';~ ~:.~~~~t~~,~~:~~{.X,:. ~~t.l~;~
1995 6,884 10,000
1994 3,482 8,000
. .-~ ... . ~~r,' :; :~~ ~~ t~;\~~~^-~ ~~'14:~~.:t: ~/~t~~._;,~
6,000 ','
";;"'1" , . , Tlt- ~ ~;;..;'''{ }~~3~.;~;t~t~
'.-.' 1.. . ~J ,
4,000 ~, - ~ . ., ;l. ,~... " -~- "
~ " ' ;";'::':: . ~'j~i;~ ~'t ..... ,
2,000 ", , ". ~. ."
-' ( , I ~,t ~) , " ..~:;.~~;'
- -.
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
Page 1
.
, '
FORTA,NGELES.
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
CITY MANAGER'S CALENDAR / REPORT
June 5, 2001
.
CITY MEETING SCHEDULE DATE TIME
" ' " <
~f/~ " -(/
JUNE ' " a }-,
Board of Adjustment Meeting Monday, June 4 7 00 p.m
City Council Meeting Tuesday, June 5 6:00 p.m.
PublIc Development Authonty Board MeetIng Wednesday, June 6 7:00 p.rn.
Gateway Committee Meeting - verified Thursday, June 7 8.15 a.rn.
RecognitIOn of USCG Cutter Active at Pier Thursday, June 7 2:00 p.m
UAC - PA Works! CommIttee Jomt MeetIng Monday, June 11 3 00 p.m
Real Estate COmmIttee Meeting - if needed Tuesday, June 12 4 00 p.m
Law Enforcement AdVISOry Board Meetmg Wednesday, June 13 6:30 P m.
Planmng CommiSSIOn Meeting Wednesday, June 13 7'00 p.m.
Outstanding Public Service Award Luncheon Thursday, June 14 11 30 am
Downtown Forward ExecutIve Committee Meeting Monday, June 18 7 00 am
City Council Meeting Monday, June 18 6:00 p.m.
2001 A WC Annual Conference - Bellevue Tues - Fn. - June 19-22 Out of Office
Parks, RecreatIOn & BeautIficatIon Commission MeetIng Thursday, June 21 7 00 p.rn.
Planning CommiSSIOn MeetIng Wednesday, June 27 7 00 P m
JULY , " a ,
a ,-> ~ ;
City Council Meeting Tuesday, July 3 6:00 p.m.
July 4th Holiday Wednesday, July 4 Closed
Gateway Committee Meeting - verified Thursday, July 5 8:15 a.rn.
. G:\CNCLPKT\CfYMGR\CMREPT\2001\Ol-0605.wpd
89
.
.
.
90
.
.
.
" '
, ;" ~
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
April 3, 2001
To:
MAYOR DOYLE AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
Michael Quinn, City Manager ~
SUBJECT:
Council Goals - Project Update
Summary: As indicated in prior informational reports, it is my desire to increase the project
information to the City Council via a series of status updates on a monthly basis. We may not
address every project each month, but will address those projects that are the most active or have
other circumstances that impact them. With the prior submittal ofthe Work Plan, these projects have
now been identified and can be tracked for monthly progress.
Recommendation:
No action necessary - information.
Backl!round / Analysis:
Goal: Financial Stability - Provide consistent and quality municipal services through the
adequacy, utilization, and development of financial resources that maximize return on
investment, leverage of outside resources, and equity for local taxpayers.
* Carnegie Library Restoration - Design has commenced. The structural value engineering
study has just started after Council approval in April. The 35% design is anticipated to be ready in
late Spring/Early Summer.
* Electric and Solid Waste Rate Reviews - The consultant is nearing completion on the Solid
Waste study. A summary ofthe results will be provided to Council in the near future. The Electric
Rate study is on hold waiting for BP A to publish their rates for the period commencing October 1,
2001.
* Revise County Opportunity Fund policies - In concert with the County, EDC, Sequim,
Forks, and other interests we have successfully revised policies to encourage more capital utilization
of this fund to encourage economic development. In summary, we now require the W ACERT
application as part ofthe process, removed the dollar limits on applications subject to justification
and budget availability, have a negotiable loan rate, and encourage a healthier balance of grant to
loan applications than previously. The most recent application approval is $100,000 for the
Hurricane Ridge PDA project.
* Reorganize the CFP for the City - Staff has revised this process to update project
descriptions and to involve a special Council sub-committee to review recommendations. The CFP
G \cnclpkt\ctymgr\apr3proJects.wpd
91
-1-
will be forwarded to council within the next month.
Goal: Intergovernmental Relations - Promote communications, legislative influence, and
agency cooperation with all public entities on the North Olympic Peninsula, as well as State,
Federal, and Tribal agencies which impact our community and environment.
* Elwha Dam Water Supply Mitigation - The report to Congress on the project has been
forwarded to the Secretary of the Interior for finalization, to which the City had an opportunity to
comment and state our positions. The hydro geologic study is underway to determine the yield of
the underwater ground source to estimate the availability of the potential water supply. The study
is anticipated to be completed in late June/early July.
* Bilateral Compliance Agreement with DOH - A proposal for filtration avoidance was
discussed with the DOH regional engineer, John Ryding. This effort is being undertaken to provide
sufficient data to DOH in determining the necessity for such a water filtration facility regardless of
the impact of dam removal. This decision is several months away and has significant impacts in
determining whether the City should be a financial participant in such a system improvement if its
need is determined to exist without the impact of dam removal.
* Draft an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe - This
agreement has been under review with staff and is being drafted for Council review within the next
month. The agreement deals with mutual governmental recognition and cooperation.
Goal: Quality Municipal Services - Organize and provide municipal services that are oriented
toward meeting the needs of our citizens, effectively utilizing available resources, and
achieving improvements in our community's quality of life.
* Black Diamond Reservoir Cover and Disinfection - This project has been awarded and
construction is expected to be complete by the first quarter of 2002.
* Water Comprehensive Plan - The plan is being developed by our consultant, CH2M Hill,
and is scheduled for completion in the fourth quarter of2001.
* Washington Survey & Rating Bureau - The submittals and site visit have been very
professional and we are awaiting one more visit and final report. We feel confident in protecting our
current class 4 rating.
* Ambulance - We have taken delivery of our new ambulance and placed it into service on
May 15th. Paramedics praise the enhanced operational capabilities, and the patients enjoy a smoother
ride.
Goal: Employee Excellence - Expand programs and policies that enhance the work
environment, stimulate employee performance, and promote customer service to assure the
provision of quality municipal services and prepare our employees for the future challenges
in municipal government.
* Performance Evaluation Training - The performance evaluation process has been developed
with a merit performance element. The training phase has now commenced for the management and
supervisory staff to effectively administer the new process and format.
* Update of Civil Service Rules - Preliminary proposals have been circulated to both police
G \cnclpkt\ctymgr\apr3projects wpd
-2-
92
.
.
.
.
.
.
,"
''-, "4 ,.. 'l "
~:,~':,:{:
...;;t~;{.\ '
and fire unions for review.
Goal: Community Development - Develop policies and promote implementation measures that
enact our Comprehensive Plan, preserve the character of our community, and provide the
necessary public facilities and infrastructure consistent with our vision for the future.
* Annexation - The Department Heads are organized into an Annexation Task Force to
coordinate our preliminary service plans and analyze impacts associated with annexation of our
eastern UGA. Weare in the process of finalizing draft #3 of the Annexation Report and hope to
have it ready for circulation to the Council, other agencies, and affected citizens by mid-June.
* Waterfront Trail - Clallam County has received the permits and funding to construct a
portion of the waterfront trail from Morse Creek west to the Deane property. Construction should
commence in August. The Deane property is ready for closure to be acquired for trail use and should
be forthcoming to the Council within the month. In addition, staff is working with Rayonier to
establish a temporary trail easement that will not interfere with cleanup activities. This is scheduled
for completion as an agreement later this Summer.
* 8th Street Reconstruction - The project is anticipated to be complete by the end of June.
* Airport Road Realignment Project - The project has been rebid with the apparent low
bidder being Delhur Industries.
* Fiber Optic Business Planning - The business plan and strategic direction to develop
broadband telecommunications infrastructure has been approved.
* Cable Television Franchise Renewal- Completion ofthe citizen survey and assessment
of future needs is anticipated by the end of June. The cable television franchise renewal public
proceeding is underway. A cable television survey is also available on the internet,
http://www . mcco.comfPortAngeles/.
* Telecommunications Ordinances - The Council will be requested to consider adoption of
the ordinances which are currently being drafted to reflect current comments of significance received
through our public hearing process. We have received our first right-of-way license application from
the PUD for their fiber optic system.
* Morse Creek Hydroelectric Facility - The lease is being held in abeyance pending
resolution of concerns expressed by local groups and organizations. Upon resolution ofthe issues
the lease will be brought back to Council for approval.
* Valley Creek Estuary Park - The pedestrian bridge over the mouth of the creek has been
approved by the State Department of Fisheries. The irrigation and pavers have been installed. The
observatory deck, paving of the trail along Oak Street, and landscaping still need completion by the
Fall.
* Francis Street Park - Primo Construction is expected to commence work in June and
complete the project by late Fall.
* William Shore Pool Renovation - Staffis planning on reconvening the Steering Committee
for the project. The purpose is to develop a strategy for developing the project.
* Laurel Street Slope Stabilization - The project is under design and will be advertised later
this Summer.
* Storm-water Design at Crown Park - This project is also under design with advertisement
expected later this Summer.
* Comprehensive Plan Amendments - This process has been reviewed by the Planning
G \cnclpkt\ctymgr\apr3proJects wpd
-3-
93
Commission and several recommendations will be forwarded to the Council. One of the most
significant proposals is to allow City utilities in the UGA with certain conditions.
.
Goal: Economic Development - Stimulate the community's economy through a combination
of policies and programs which diversify the economic base, support the community and
resource-based activities, provide adequate infrastructure and support, promote the
opportunities for high technology and innovative applications for our business and industrial
base, and establish the community's prominence as the service and activity center ofthe North
Olympic Peninsula.
* Downtown Watermain Replacement Phase II - This project was recognized by the National
and State Public Works Associations as the best project in its category of2-1 0 million dollars. Staff
has also prepared an application for phase ill funding.
* Landfill Plan - Staff and our consultant, Parametrix, are working on a long range strategy
to be discussed with UAC and the Council in the next few months.
Goal: Community Livability - Protect, preserve and enhance the quality of living within our
community which fosters a commitment toward excellence in environmental, cultural, social,
and physical benefits to our citizens.
* Watershed Planning - The Elwha-Morse Management Team has received a Bureau of
Reclamation water budget assessment for the Elwha River and other local streams; and is focusing
on a watershed plan for Morse Creek.
* Citizen Code Advisory - The group has commenced review and has completed the initial
review of building and construction codes. They continue to meet and a report will be forthcoming
to the City Council. .
* Modified Fire Extinguisher Maintenance Requirements - The fire extinguisher self-
inspection program has been implemented. June 19th is the first training class to be held at the Fire
Station. Representatives from the Port, School District, and City will be in attendance.
Goal: Community Relations - Enhance citizen-government communication in order to promote
a more responsive and accountable municipal organization which functions with
understanding and support for its constituency.
* Community Education - Sparky Week was just completed as the 67th offering ofthis special
event. Nearly 250 second grade students were transported via fire engine to the station where they
participated in hands-on activities designed to increase their awareness offire safety and earthquake
preparedness. With the help of our volunteers this is a very successful event.
-4-
.
G \cnclpkt\ctymgr\apr3projects wpd
94
o
~
.
~
.
.
_ ~ 1'-"'1. ~ ~
;.- ,
-I", '-:'.
~ORTANGEi.ES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
DATE:
May 25,2001
To:
Michael Quinn, City Manager
FROM:
Glenn A. Cutler, P.E., Director of Public Works & Utilities
SUBJECT:
Industrial Water Line Leak Repairs, Project 20-27
The Public Works and Utilities Department completed repairs on the Industrial Water Line (IWL) that
coincided with a scheduled mill shutdown by Daishowa America the week of May 14, 2001. At least
three locations on the IWL had leaks of varying volume. These leaks were repaired after the IWL was
emptied.
The final cost to complete the work is in the range of $70,000-$1 00,000. The method of repair was
similar to previous repair work completed on the IWL in 1985 and 1991, when a hydraulic cement
was used. A hydrophyllic urethane was also used at some leaking joints, to allow
expansion/contraction without further cracking and leaking. Daishowa America will reimburse the
City for the final contract amount for this work, per the existing maintenance agreement.
Daishowa America was satisifed with the performance of the repair work.. A representative of the
Washington State Department of Labor and Industries Safety Consultant Program assisted in the site
safety coordination, and visited the site during the work. He was impressed with the jobsite safety
and submitted a positive report to the City.
N \PROJECTS\20-27 I W.L repalrs\mernotocm wpd
95
.
.
.
96
.
.
.
HUMAN RESOURCES REPORT
March - May, 2001
NEW HIRES:
Regular Full-Time:
.
Roger Vess
Mark Hughey
Lee Adams
Permit Technician, Dept. of Community Development, 03/05/01
Commercial Energy Analyst, Public Works/Utilities, 03/19/01
Electrical Inspector, Public WorkslUtilities, OS/21/01
.
.
March
April
Mav
Seasonal Parks Caretakers:
Part- Time Pool, Rec Aides, Etc.
Seasonal Laborers
V olunteer Firefighters
3
1
8
1
4
2
1
RESIGNATIONS/RETIREMENTS
John Hicks
Steve McLane
Ron Maxwell
Tom Sperline
Recreation Manager
Police Sergeant
Lineman
Electrical Inspector
Resigned 03/02/01
Retired 03/31/01
Resigned 04120/01
Retired 5/31/01
JOB POSTINGS
· Electrical Engineering Specialist II
· Police Corporal
· Seasonal Parks Caretakers
· Permit Technician
· Customer Service Leadworker
· Electrical Inspector/Traffic Signal Electrician
· Serviceman
· Recreation Services Manager
· Electrical Engineering Specialist IIII
· Electrical Inspector
· Human Resources Analyst
· Legal Assistant
97
.
.
.
98
.
.
.
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
April 25, 2001
7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Bob Philpott, Fred Norton, Linda Nutter, Fred Hewins,
Chuck Schramm, Mary Craver, Rick Porter
Members Excused:
None
Staff Present:
Brad Collins, Debra Barnes
Public Present:
Ken Henshaw, Bill Roberds, Jerry Noeske, Rita Noeske,
Mike Keeley, Bob Sorenson, Stephanie Lund, Marilyn
Jackson, 1. Scott Jackson, Dennis Leinaar, Ann Leinaar,
Gene Webber, Alice Webber, Arline Dailey, Jimm Sweet,
Howard Jensen, Bill Bock
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Philpott moved to approve the April 11, 2001, meeting minutes as presented.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Norton and passed unanimously with
Commissioner Porter not voting as he was not at the meeting.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - SMA 01-02-
PORT ANGELES YACHT CLUB. 1305 Marine Drive: A proposal to enclose a
covered patio area, construct an 8' x 20' covered addition and a deck to an existing
structure within the Boat Haven in the Industrial Heavy zone. (This item was
continued from the March 28, 2001 meeting.)
Planner Barnes provided an update of the staff report which summarized the discussion by the
Planning Commission at the March 28, 2001 meeting. Staff recommended that should the Planning
Commission approve the application, the conditions of approval be further clarified. The applicant
provided a letter from the Port of Port Angeles which stated that they had no objection to the deck
design as long as access could be made, and that they could not allocate parking spaces for one use.
Also, a revised deck design was provided by the applicant at the meeting. Staff analyzed the
parking requirements and provided a summary in the packet. A lengthy discussion on parking
regulations and its applicability to the proposal followed. Commissioner Hewins asked about public
access limitations that may result by the proposal, including physical and visual access. Staff
responded that access is currently restricted by the existing fence and that the proposal would not
significantly increase public access impacts. Commissioner Norton noted that the deck size has
been reduced in the new deck design.
99
Planning CommISsIon Minutes
April 25. 2001
Page 2
Commissioners Porter and Nutter stated that they each read the materials and listened to the tape of
the March 28,2001 meeting and are prepared to review and act on the proposal.
.
Bill Roberds, 54 West Misty Lane, agent for the applicant spoke in favor of the application noting
that expansion of the Yacht Club facilities to the east was the most cost effective and practical at this
time. He added that the proposal was made after review of the Port's future plans of the marina area
which may include further expansion of the building and a public walkway along the northerly
shoreline. He reiterated that the deck may be cantilevered lO-feet as shown on the site plan. He
answered several questions relating to erosion of the rip rap area.
Commission Porter asked if the riprap near the Yacht Club was under the same design as other areas
of the marina with deeper water. The applicant did not know the answer to the question and added
that the Port is planning future repairs near the Yacht Club, as well as others. Commissioner
Schramm asked for additional information on the location of the deck footing and extent of the
riprap. Mr. Roberds answered that a review of the eroded area indicated the extent of the riprap is
approximately 3 feet behind the log at the top of the bank. He added that the fill and riprap structure
consists of pit run fill and the armor approximately 2-rocks deep.
Commissioner Schramm noted that a significant amount of erosion and repair of the riprap area
occurred at the northeast comer of the fill area in 1964 and asked if test holes were dug to determine
the extent of the riprap. Mr. Roberds explained that cantilevered design was required by Dept. of .
Fisheries to avoid footings in the riprap or water.
Commissioner Nutter asked about stormwater control improvements. Mr. Roberds answered that
the Port will evaluate the drainage problems as part of the riprap repairs and explained that the
drainage problems were due to grass growing at the edge of the pavement, resulting in a dam which
directed drainage to the north where the low spot is near the dingy dock access ramp. He reiterated
that the Port's future plans include a sidewalk in this area, along with a new catch basin to address
the current drainage patterns.
Commissioner Craver asked if the deck will be constructed after the riprap is repaired which was
answered to the affirmative.
Commissioner Porter stated that he has been familiar with Bill Roberds for over a year.
Being that no other person wished to speak on the application, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Philpott stated that the applicant was given additional time to obtain more
information and meet with staff to address the Planning Commission's concerns. Commissioner
Hewins stated that although he supported the Yacht Club and what it provides to the community, the
application materials and staff report are still incomplete and does not contain adequate information
necessary for a substantial development permit, including impacts onto public view, access to the
shoreline and complete remodels by future Port improvements. He added that the proposal would .
not be defeated by the current policies. Discussion followed regarding ways to write the conditions
to address any concerns and whether or not subsequent permit requirements would resolve some
100
e:
.
e
r
. I'~
Planmng CommISSIon MInutes
Apnl25, 2001
Page 3
concerns. A brief discussion occurred relating to the fact that the Planning Commission does not take
into consideration who the applicant is.
Commissioner Craver recommended a condition that no deck construction should occur until the rip
rap and erosion problem was repaired. Commissioner Norton clarified that this should be done
before the deck is constructed which was affirmed by Commissioner Craver.
Commissioner Schramm recommended a condition that no construction be done until staff review
has been made and permits are obtained. Staff commented that this would occur regardless.
Extensive discussion on parking availability in the marina parking lot occurred, including the
requirements for Destiny Restaurant and management of the parking facility by the Port.
Commissioner Schramm commented that there is a distinction between use of a public parking lot
by a commercial facility as compared to a public, semi-public or non-profit facility. Commissioner
Porter commented that the geographical separation of the buildings and current layout of the parking
area and buildings should not lead to parking conflicts. Commissioner Norton requested clarification
on Condition #5. Director Collins stated that, as written, Condition #5 allows for staff to ensure
parking ordinance compliance.
Planner Barnes offered an update of the conditions of approval based on the discussions thus far.
This included replacement of Condition #2 based on Commissioner Schramm's suggestion about
subsequent staff review and permit requirements as follows: "No excavation or construction of the
building or deck shall occur until staff review has been made and all permits are obtained." This
new condition would replace the recommended Condition #2 as shown in the staff report as there
are no plans for construction to go north. Planner Barnes also recommended the deletion of
Condition #3 as it no longer a~plies due to the building addition no longer being proposed to be used
as storage. This included adding a sentence or addition to Conditions #4: "such repair shall be made
prior to any construction of the building or deck". Director Collins noted that the requirement should
not apply to the building. Planner Barnes suggests "building or deck" on Condition #4. Planner
Barnes recommended that Condition #6 also be amended to add the following at the beginning of
the sentence: "Prior to issuance of any building permit..."
Commissioner Hewins asked if there is no longer a building setback required which was answered
to the affirmative due to the building not being used for storage. Staff stated that a setback for the
building could be established by the Commission.
Commissioner Norton confirmed that the original Condition #2 is no longer applicable. Planner
Barnes recommended replacing Condition #2 with Commissioner Schramm's suggestion.
Director Collins commented on the setback issue and suggested that one option would be to require
the allowance for public access to the shoreline. Discussion followed, including that the fence
would need to be removed to allow for public access in order to reduce conflicts with public use of
this area. Director Collins gave an example (Highland Court) which had a fenced area that was gated
and had restricted hours but still allowed for some public access to a trail. He added that this could
address some public access concerns that have been raised and allow for access to the site which is
not always used by the Yacht Club or affiliates but should also be discussed with the applicant.
101
PlDnmng CommISSion MInUtes
Ap,,125, 2001
Page 4
Commissioner Schramm commented that other Port-leased properties have not been required to
provide public access.
.
Commissioner Hewins stated that this is an opportunity to provide further public access near the
Pocket Park. Commissioner Nutter stated that pubic access needs to be addressed. Commissioner
Craver added that potential conflicts would result by allowing public access to the deck and that
public access should be required at the time that the Port re-designs this area. Commissioner Nutter
suggested a condition to this effect. Commissioner Hewins stated that no condition should be
required for public access to the deck but the Commission should require a setback for the building.
Commissioner Craver commented that joint use of parking facilities needs to be reviewed further
and promoted. Commissioner Norton commented that the findings need to be revised to reflect the
new deck size and that it may be appropriate to set limits in the condition for the deck size. Staff
responded that the dimensions could be added to Condition #1, and corrections to Finding #1 to
reflect the new deck size. Staff stated that the conditions should be renumbered. Staff repeated the
changes made to the conditions.
Chair asked for any additional discussion or a motion. Commissioner Schramm moved to approve
SMA 01-02 citing the revised 5 conditions, 18 findings and 5 conclusions as discussed and modified
(listed below). Commissioner Craver seconded the motion. Commissioner Nutter repeated the
motion and asked if ''what Debi did" needs to be repeated in which there was no objection. The
motion passed 5-2 with Chair Nutter and Commissioner Hewins voting against the motion. Chair
Nutter stated her concerns regarding parking issues and construction near or over the rip rap. .
Commissioner Hewins stated his concerns over construction at the edge of or over the shoreline, that
the proposal has not been adequately developed, and that adequate information was not provided.
Based on the language of the motion and vote, including that the last reference to the status of the
conditions was what was provided by Planner Barnes, the conditions of approval adopted as follows:
Conditions of Approval
1. The footings for the proposed 10 foot by 30 foot (300 s.f.) deck shall be located landward of
the top of the riprap structure which is approximately 9 feet easterly of the edge of the paved
patio area. No alteration of the riprap structure shall be made for footing placement,
including fill. The uncovered deck can extend easterly over the riprap upon obtaining permit
approval by the various resource agencies no further than 10-feet from the eastern edge of
the building, for a maximum 6-feet over the top of the riprap, and upon the submittal of a
reconnaissance study in accordance with Chapter 4(F)(9) of the Shoreline Master Program
to the City of Port Angeles for review and approval, which may result in additional
conditions and/or mitigation measures, and upon Port approval to address maintenance
access.
2.
No excavation or construction of the building or deck shall occur until staff review has been
made and all permits have been obtained.
.
102
.
.1
.
,h
, ~. ',<-';'- ~ "
",';:<-;;.,,'!,:r:
Planning Commuslon M,nutes
Apn125,200J
Page 5
3.
Repair of the eroded riprap area requires either a substantial development permit, or
shoreline exemption, depending on the scope of the repair, in addition to other agency
approvals and is not authorized as a part of this permit. Such repair shall be made prior to
any construction of the building or deck.
4. Compliance with the PAMC 14.40, Parking Ordinance, is required which may include that
the Port of Port Angeles shall authorize joint use of the parking lot and shall assure that use
of the facilities do not conflict which would result in parking and/or congestion problems.
5. Prior to issuance of any building permit, appropriate measures shall be made to direct runoff
from existing and new impervious surfaces away from the riprap and erosion area.
Findings
1. A shoreline substantial development application was submitted by Port Angeles Yacht Club
on January 10,2001 for the enclosure of an attached covered deck area 12 feet by 30 feet in
size (360 s.f.), the construction of a small building addition 8 feet by 30 feet in size (240 s.t:),
and the placement of an uncovered deck (10 ft. by 30 ft, or 300 s.t:) that would extend
waterward of the ordinary high water mark (mean higher high tide), all associated with the
Port Angeles Yacht Club. Cumulatively, the facility would be expanded by the 600 square
foot building addition and the 300 square foot deck. The deck materials include treated
lumber and plastic/wood polymer type decking.
2.
The Yacht Club has been in existence since the 1930s. The existing main building is
approximately 30 feet by 50 feet, or 1500 (gross) square feet in size and contains a meeting
room, kitchen, restrooms and storage areas. There are two small outbuildings, 12 by 20
square feet each in size which are located west of the main building.
3. The Club leases 6480 square feet of the Boat Haven facility from the Port of Port Angeles
which includes 10 parking spaces.
4. The application also states that a few of the rip rap materials will be removed in order to
anchor the foundation for the proposed deck, and will then be replaced. Included are
excavation of holes into the soil near the riprap structure for the placement of 18-inch
sonotube forms for the concrete footings, as well as fill for the southeast footing placement
(3 foot by 3 foot in diameter). Also mentioned is the need to address erosion problems
which has occurred adjacent to the existing ramp and in the vicinity of the proposed deck
which requires repair by the property owner (port of Port Angeles) prior to deck construction.
5. Adjacent to the site to the north is the Port Angeles Harbor, to the west is a pocket park and
public boat ramp access that are a part of the Boat Haven, further west are industrial uses,
to the south is the parking lot for the west boat haven along with public restrooms and a
restaurant along Marine Drive, and to the east is the marina.
6.
The parking area for the West boat Haven has 154 parking spaces of which 30 spaces are
103
Plannmg COmmW10n Mmutes
Ap,,/25,200/
Page 6
double in length for boat trailers. Expansions of existing uses also require compliance with .
P AMC 14.40, as it applies.
7. The Port Angeles Harbor provides near shore marine habitat for juvenile Puget Sound
chinook salmon, which are listed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act.
Nearshore marine areas provide habitat for salmon, as well as for bait fish such as herring
and sand lance. Within the Boathaven, salmon and herring have been seen; however, their
extent in the proposed location is not known. Eelgrass and near shore areas are known as key
habitat for juvenile salmon as it provides refuge, as well as feeding habitat.
8. The designation of the subject site is Urban Harbor (UH) and Aquatic Harbor (AH) in the
Port Angeles Shoreline Master Program, Industrial (I) in the Port Angeles Comprehensive
Plan, and Industrial Heavy (IH) in the Zoning Code, and boating facilities are permitted uses
in each of these designations. The Yacht Club is associated with the marina which is a
longstanding use that is specifically allowed at this location. '
9. The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the Port Angeles Shoreline Master Program.
Those most relevant include the following: Chapter 4 D-Environmental Impacts Policy 1 and
Regulations 1,4, 7, and 12; E-Environmentally Sensitive Areas Policy 1 and Regulation 1;
F-Kelp Beds, Eelgrass Beds, Herring Spawning Areas, Smelt Spawning Areas, Shellfish
Areas and Other Critical Salt Water Habitats Policies 1-9 and Regulations 3, 4, 7; H-
Salmon and Steelhead Habitats Policies 1-4 and Regulations 1 and 5, J-Public Access
Policies 1-7 and Regulations 4; K-Shorelines of State-wide Significance Policies 1-6, .
Chapter 5 Aquatic Harbor Policy 5, Urban Harbor Policies 1,2,9 and 10, and Use Table H;
Chapter 6 B-Boating Facilities Policies 1,2 and 3 and Regulations General 1, 4,9, 11 and
18.
10. The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan. Those
most relevant include the following: Conservation Element Goal A, Policy 1, Goal B and
Policies 1-2, 5-6, 9-10, 19, and 21, Goal D and Policies 1, 4, 7-8, Utilities and Public
Services Element, Goal A and C, Economic Development Element Goal B and Policy 1.
11. The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the Port Angeles Zoning Code as marinas are
permitted uses within the IH zone.
12. The application materials were sent to the Department of Ecology (DOE), the Washington
State Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW), Corps of Engineers, and the Lower Elwha
Klallam Tribal Council for review. Conditions of approval were recommended, as well as
preferred changes to the site design.
13. The Light Department and Public Works Department each indicated they have no comments
or recommended conditions of approval regarding the application. The Fire Department
requested that new construction comply with the Fire Code.
14.
One written public comment was received in opposition of this application. The written
.
104
.
.
.
~. J-.'''' ,. ~~ ',- ..\- '.;'\ ':~;:-"'?, \1
, " .
Planning CommISSIon Mmutes
Aprt125. 2001
Page 7
public comment period concluded March 15,2001.
15.
The aquatic shoreline is defmed by the City's Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA)
Ordinance, Chapter 15.20, as a "beach and associated coastal drift process area, and a
"Priority Species and Species ofConcem Habitat Areas". Buffer and protective standards
for these areas are generally deferred to the Shoreline Master Program. A habitat
management may be required to address impacts and propose mitigation.
16. Approval of SMA 01-02 shall also be deemed as approval for the activity in accordance with
Chapter 15.20 PAMC.
17. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Responsible Official issued a Determination
of Non-Significance for the project on March 14,2001.
18. Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance, Chapter 15.12 PAMC, requires that any proposal be
required to ensure that the base flood or water surface elevation is not increased more than
one foot, which can be made by the proposal.
Conclusions
1. The proposal, as conditioned, would allow for a small expansion of a joint-use recreation
facility .
2.
The proposal, as conditioned, would not negatively affect critical saltwater habitat.
3. The proposal, as conditioned, is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Code and is a permitted use with the Industrial Light zone.
4. The proposal, as conditioned, is consistent with the Shoreline Master Program.
5. Shoreline developments that are designed with the least environmental impact to the
shoreline and its resources is in the best public interest and welfare and furthers the goals and
intent of the Shoreline Management Act and Shoreline Master Program.
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - SMA 01-
04 - PUGET SOUND PILOTS - 305 Ediz Hook Road: A shoreline
substantial development and conditional use permit for the upgrade of the
existing operations facility, including the existing pier, pilings, decking and
expanded moorage platform.
Planner Barnes provided the staff report. Additional materials provided in the packet or at the
meeting included a copy of the lease between the applicant and the City of Port Angeles which
references 3 overflow parking spaces, a 1985 Planning Dept. interpretation which stated that 10
parking spaces are required, a memo from the Fire Dept. requesting an added condition for a
standpipe, and a memo from the City Parks Department about compatibility issues with the adjacent
105
Plannmg CommISSion Mmutes
April 25. 200/
Page 8
public boat launch. Staff stated that the questions on Page 4 of the staff report have been answered
by the applicant. Additionally, based on staff's knowledge of mitigation that is being worked out
with W A Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, including the removal of piers and pilings in other locations
in the harbor, should be sufficient to mitigate the impacts onto the public's use of the shorelines in
this area, as well as fish and wildlife impacts. Staff provided a brief overview of the overheads of
the various site plans provided in the application. Corrections to the staff report included the
following:
.
2. Page 3, Para. 3. Change last sentence to reference 10 existing parking spaces.
3. Page 4, Delete reference to Condition #8 of SMA 00-01 as this condition was not included
in the Planning Commission's decision on that application.
4. Page 4. Staffread into the report the response to these questions by the applicant and stated
that these questions have been answered.
5. Page 5. Last para. Delete reference to chapter 8 of the SMP.
6. Page 9. Last para. Add sentence that additional mitigation beyond what is understood to be
proposed by the applicant is not necessary.
7. Page 10, Condition #6 - drop second sentence.
Commissioner Hewins asked for clarification of the increased amount of protrusion into the
shoreline by the expanded facility. Commissioner Porter asked for clarification of the purpose of
the log boom.
Stephanie Lund, consultant for the applicant, spoke in favor of the application and provided a .
history of the project including the environmental assessments and six different alternatives reviewed
by the Puget Sound Pilots Association. The preferred alternative replaces the existing structures with
a larger mooring platform. She corrected the statement about trestle width, adding that the proposed
trestle is the same width, but has a 10-foot longer length. The existing dock is at -9 MLLW and the
proposed barge would be at -12 MLL W which will have fewer fisheries impacts. Commissioner
Philpott asked for clarification if the size for the mooring area was adequate.
Jimm Sweet, Puget Sound Pilots, spoke in favor of the application reiterating the need for the
upgrades proposed due to safety issues relating to the structure, size of new pilot boats, size of ships
and ship traffic. He added that mitigation measures for the additional over-water cover in other areas
of the harbor have been researched and agreed in conjunction with the W A Dept. of Fish and
Wildlife whereby they have an agreement with the Port of Port Angeles to remove piles off of Ediz
Hook east of the log dump trestle and pilings, and also 8 pilings west of the Coho ferry dock near
the downtown. Written confirmation of owners of these mitigation project sites were submitted
(Port of Port Angeles and Dept. of Natural Resources). Several questions of the Planning
Commission were answered including the location and use of the mitigation pilings, description of
gangway lifting arm, use of cranes on the mooring platform which was proposed last year, the
necessity for the size of the mooring platform, and parking needs by the pilots. Mr. Sweet added that
the Glosten Report and marine architects have stated that the minimum length of the platform be 112
feet and the width 2-times the width of the vessel which would be 38-feet.
Howard Jensen, attorney for the applicant, spoke in favor of the proposal. He responded to .
questions raised in the Parks Dept. memo and provided an overview of the general construction
106
~~ "~l' '\ '~~';'}".' ;"
Plannmg CommISSIon M,nutes
April 25, 200/
Page 9
.1
sequence and hours of operation that are anticipated which are still subject to bid. He stated that the
construction would not restrict public access and cooperation with users of the boat launch and trail
would be done. He reiterated that adjustments would be made in order to accommodate adjacent
recreational uses for any short term effects. He requested that adjustments to some of the language
in the conditions, findings and conclusions be made, as listed below. Discussion followed.
· Condition #6. Delete second sentence.
· Condition #7. Add an exception that Condition # 1 of the MDNS as it no longer applies.
Also noted was that the staff report should be corrected.
· Condition #9. Replace with a broader condition which is similar to that required by the Corps
of Engineers: "The applicant shall not prevent the full and free use by the public of all
navigable waters or right-of-ways at or adjacent to the project area authorized by this
permit. "
· Finding #10. Add a statement that alternative locations were not feasible.
· Conclusion #C. Add a statement that the proposal was in the public interest.
Commissioner Hewins inquired about Condition #2 and preferred that the other standard condition
be used to replace the current language in this condition. The anticipated construction sequence and
details were discussed. Effects onto the fish farm upland lease area was discussed. Effects onto
public use of the boat ramps during the upcoming fishing season were discussed. Effects of grated
decking onto fish habitat were explained.
.1
Discussion of the revised conditions, findings and conclusion occurred with the applicant. Condition
# 13 was added to address the Parks Dept. concerns that aren't addressed by other conditions.
Comments on the revisions were made by the applicant. Continued discussion on the parking issues
related to the proposal occurred. Commissioner Hewins moved to approve SMAO 1-04 citing the
conditions, findings and conclusions as listed below. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Porter and passed unanimously.
Conditions of AWroval
1. Approval is for the project identified as Attachment A to the April 25, 2001, Staff
Report and as hereby conditioned.
2
If the subject site has not be previously inventoried, evaluated, and reviewed to the
satisfaction of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the subject site shall be evaluated by
a cultural review team which shall include a professional archaeologist, a
representative of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the site owner, and the City
Planning Department. This team shall determine the extent of excavation monitoring
for the project during the permit review process. As an alternative, the applicant may
volunteer to have an approved archaeologist on site during any excavation in lieu of
a review by the aforementioned cultural team. If during an excavation that by
decision of the cultural review team occurs without an approved archaeologist
on-site, any phenomena of possible archaeological interest are uncovered, the
developer shall stop such work and provide for a site inspection and evaluation by
a professional archaeologist to ensure that all possible valuable archaeological data
.
107
P/onmng CommISsion Minutes
Ap71125. 2001
Page 10
is properly salvaged.
.
3. The project shall comply with all regulations of the City's Shoreline Master Program,
specifically those of Chapters 4,5,6 and 7.
4. The proposed project shall meet all federal, state, and local requirements.
5. The applicant shall obtain a Hydraulics Project Approval (HPA) permit for this
project from the Washington State Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW).
6. The property's eastern lease line shall be adjusted as shown on the site plan
submitted as part of Attachment A.
7. Compliance with the SEPA MDNS dated January 6, 2000, shall be required.
8. Use of right-of-way or other lands managed by the City of Port Angeles for
construction staging or storage requires prior approval and written agreement
acceptable to the City Attorney.
9. Use of the public boat launch and pier floats shall not be blocked by the construction
activity without prior approval of the City Parks Department.
10.
Disposal of creosote-treated pilings shall be made in accordance with applicable state
laws.
.
11. The proposal shall not require subsequent shoreline protection measures such as
increased riprap. Alteration of the riprap to accommodate the new trestle placement
shall not reduce the integrity of the riprap structure, nor shall it include additional
riprap placement. Details of the method of placement of the trestle shall be approved
by staff prior to issuance of the required building permit.
12. The applicant shall install a fire protection stand pipe.
13. The construction shall not interfere with removal or storage of the City pier floats.
Findings
Based on the information provided in the April 25, 2001 Staff Report for SMA-OI-04
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port Angeles
Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1.
A shoreline application, SMA 01-04, was submitted by Hillis, Clark, Martin, and
Peterson, agent for Puget Sound Pilots on March 8, 2001 for upgrades and expansion
of the existing Puget Sound Pilots facility at 305 Ediz Hook Road. The application
materials include an Eelgrass, Macroalgae, and Macrofauna Habitat Survey Report
.
108
y: ,"
Plannrng CommISSion Minutes
April 25, 200/
Page / /
.'
.'
7.
.:
datea June, 1999, was prepared for the project by Parametrix, Inc., a Biological
Evaluation dated March 2001 and Alternatives Analysis dated November 2000.
2.
The applicant is proposing to replace unsound creosote-treated pilings, replace the
existing trestle and deck surrounding the operations center with mostly grated
decking, and replace and expand the berthing capacity of the moorage platform to
handle larger vessels. The purposes of the proposal are to improve the structural
integrity of the facility, improve safety measures related to docking the vessels, and
accommodate larger vessels.
3.
Cumulatively, the proposal will increase the footprint of the various structures from
3,412 total s.t: to 6,108 s.t: whereby the majority of the increased area would be over
water. Due to the grated decking, covered area over shallow waters will be decreased
by 188 s.f. and the additional covered area (moorage platform) would be in deeper
water.
4.
The application notes anticipated short-term impacts due to demolition and new
construction, including increased noise and air emissions from construction and
traffic, potential disruption of recreational opportunities due to the vicinity of the
proposal to a public boat launch, and decreased water quality and potential impacts
onto fish and aquatic life (habitat and migration). Construction would be scheduled
to avoid fish migration, or between July 15th and October 14th, and would last 6-8
weeks.
5.
Use of the upland area to the west of the boat launch for a contractor staging area is
also proposed which should reduce the number of vehicle trips on Ediz Hook and
Marine Drive. A crane and pile hammer staged on a barge will be utilized for
removal and placement of the pilings. The barge will be brought in on a daily basis,
taking into consideration high tides to avoid impacts onto aquatic vegetation.
6. The applicants conducted an eelgrass survey in 1999 which revealed the presence of
three small eelgrass patches near the site. One location is west of the trestle; the
others are located either south or east of the decking around the operations center.
There are various eelgrass shoots in the vicinity.
A biological evaluation was conducted which concluded that threatened or
endangered species in the vicinity of the project area includes Chinook salmon, bull
trout, bald eagles and marbled murrelets. The application states that the project will
not impede migration of salmon. Chinook and coho migrate through the Strait of de
Fuca, including the Port Angeles Harbor, and may forage in the Harbor. Anadromous
bull trout also migrate through the Harbor. Juvenile chinook and coho are most likely
found in near shore areas less than 3-meters deep where food is typically most
abundant. Adult salmon and bull trout often migrate and forage further away from
the shoreline but tend to remain at the top 3-9 meters of the water. The Biological
evaluation also concluded that the proposal may affect but is not likely to adversely
affect Chinook salmon, bull trout, coho salmon and marbled murrelets, and will not
affect bald eagles.
109
P/a"",ng CommISSion Mmutes
April 25, 200/
Page /2
8.
Improved fish migration may result by increasing light penetration from the
placement of the grated decking in shallow waters. The number of support piles in
the nearshore area is minimal. The bulk of the over-water structure would be located
seaward of the preferred migration pathway for juvenile salmon. Overall, the
proposal will reduce the number of support piles, will decrease the amount of shading
in the nearshore area, and will decrease the amount of light and glare at the facility.
9. A letter report from The Glosten Associates, Inc. was submitted which included an
assessment of floating berths versus a fixed pier design scenario. The report
concluded that a floating berth would provide increased safety over a fixed pier and
that the size proposed was nearly ideal for current and tidal conditions at the site.
10. The Puget Sound Pilots facility has been located in the Port Angeles since the 1940s.
The operations provide docking and navigational services to commercial and foreign
ship traffic into Puget Sound. The testimony provided by the applicants included that
alternative location to the Pilot's facility is not feasible.
11. In 1985, the City approved a Shoreline Permit (SMA(I)66) that expanded the
housing capacity of the facility from eight to fifteen pilots. The approval included
an agreement to accept ten parking spaces as the number of spaces required by the
facility after the proposed expansion.
12.
In 2000, the City of Port Angeles approved SMA-OO-Ol that proposed a three-phase
project to replace the existing pier with an expanded pier, to replace the docking
facility with a floating barge in order to accommodate a larger vessel, to replace all
unsound pilings, and to increase the housing capacity of the pilot house.
13. A Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance was issued by the City of Port
Angeles SEPA Responsible Official for the proposal on January 6, 2000. This
determination is in good standing and is applicable to the current proposal.
14. In accordance with legal requirements of the City of Port Angeles and the State of
Washington, the notice of application and subsequent hearing process was advertised
in the Peninsula Daily News. The public comment period for this application
concluded April 13, 2001.
15. The City Public Works Department did not recommend any conditions of approval
specific to this application.
16.
110
The following Agencies and Tribes were notified of the application: Washington
Department ofFish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Ecology, U.S. Coast
Guard, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lower Elwha Klallam Tribal Council.
Comments from the WDFW declared that the HP A was incomplete. Also stated was
that the new proposal was more sensitive to fish habitat concerns and that if the
proposed berthing structure (barge) could not be reduced to further minimize shading
then mitigation was in order which could include removal of fish migration or habitat
.
.
.
.
.
.
Planning Commwlon Mmutes
Apnl25,2001
Page 13
barriers at a I: I ratio.
17.
The aquatic shoreline is defined by the City's Environmentally Sensitive Areas
(ESA) Ordinance as a "beach and associated coastal drift process area". Approval
of SMA 01-04 shall also constitute as an administrative ESA approval required under
PAMC 15.20.
18. The Port Angeles Shoreline Master Program, Comprehensive Plan, and Zoning
Ordinance were reviewed with respect to this application.
19. The site is located in a portion of the Open Space designation as well as part of an
un-designated transitional area of the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. It
is zoned Industrial Heavy [lli] and Public Buildings and Parks [PBP], and is adjacent
to Commercial Arterial [CA].
20. The Shoreline Designations are Urban Harbor (UH) and Aquatic-Harbor [AH]
whereby maritime transportation facilities are a permitted use. The proposed pier and
dock (moorage float) requires a conditional use permit approval when located in an
area with high environmental value for fish.
21. Related Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Master Program policies and regulations
are included in Attachment B to the Staff Report.
22.
The City's waterfront trail rW1S east and west along Ediz Hook Drive and terminates
north of the subject property. Adjacent to the site is a public boat launch.
Conclusions
Based on the information provided in the April 25, 2001, Staff Report for SMA 01-04,
including all of its attachments, comments and information presented during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed
findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby concludes that:
A. As conditioned, the project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning
Ordinance, and Shoreline Master Program. The shoreline use as a maritime
transportation facility is a permitted use in the IH zone, and UH and AH shoreline
designations. The proposed pier and dock (moorage facility) requires a conditional
use permit approval if located near an area of high environmental value for fish.
B. As conditioned, the project will not be detrimental to the shoreline and aquatic
environment, and will provide for some enhancement of fish migration and habitat.
C.
The proposed project is a reinvestment in the harbor's freight terminal facilities and
reemphasizes the role of marine traffic in the community's economy. Approval of
the proposed project is in the public interest.
111
Planning Commission Minutes
Aprr125. 2001
Page 14
D.
As conditioned, the proposed project will enhance the public health, safety and
welfare.
E. As conditioned, the project will not interfere with public use of or access to public
lands or waters.
F. As conditioned, the project is consistent with the requirements of the Shoreline
Management Act and Shoreline Master Program.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None.
STAFF REPORTS
CPAOI-Ol. Director Collins provided an overview of the 2001 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment application which was included in the packet. A public hearing is scheduled
for May 9, 2001 on the proposed amendments. [Please note that this has changed to May 23]
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
None
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 11 :30 p.m.
Brad Collins, Secretary
Linda Nutter, Chair
PREPAREDBY D. Barnes
112
.
.
.
.
.!
.
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
May 9, 2001
7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Bob Philpott, Fred Norton, Linda Nutter, Fred Hewins,
Chuck Schramm, Mary Craver, Rick Porter
Members Excused:
None
Staff Present:
Brad Collins, Debra Barnes
Public Present:
Ken Henshaw, Marilyn Jackson, J. Scott Jackson, and Dennis
Leinaar
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Several typographical corrections were noted. A discussion regarding the portion of the minutes
relating to SMA 01-02 occurred with Chair Nutter stating that staff was directed to compile the
minutes to accurately reflect what occurred on April 25th. Chair Nutter ruled that the minutes should
be adopted and that discussion on the specific application should occur after approval of a motion
to amend "something previously adopted" in order to correct what the Commission feels is
necessary. Staff concurred with the ruling. Discussion followed as to which method should be used
to further clarify the intent of the Commission's motion on SMA 01-02. Commissioner Hewins
moved to table the approval of the minutes until staff makes the minor corrections and adds more
detail relating to how staff compiled the conditions that the Commissioners voted on. Commissioner
Craver seconded the motion which passed 7-0.
OLD BUSINESS:
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - SMA 00-02 -
PORT ANGELES YACHT CLUB. 1305 Marine Drive: A proposal to enclose a
covered patio area, construct an 8' x 20' covered addition and a deck to an existing
structure within the Boat Haven in the Industrial Heavy zone.
Commissioners Porter and Philpott disclosed their discussions on the application with
representatives of the applicant which occurred the day after the public hearing. Chair Nutter asked
if there was any objection to the commissioners continuing to participate and act on the application.
There were none from the audience.
Commissioner Schramm moved to amend the conditions for SMAO 1-02 as previously approved.
Commissioner Philpott seconded the motion which passed unanimously. Several commissioners
113
Planning COmm13Sl0n Minutes
May 9. 200 J
Page 2
noted that they did not recall that there was any intent for the building to be included in Condition .
#3. There was also discussion on Conditions #1 and #5. Commissioner Schramm noted that Finding
#4 is incorrect as it describes previous designs. Discussion occurred on the need for a
reconnaissance study noted in Condition # 1. Discussion occurred regarding the role of the W A
Department of Fish and Wildlife and other resource agencies in the permit process, as well as the
SMP requirement for a reconnaissance study. Staff summarized this specific requirement adopted
in the SMP, the definition of critical habitat and the additional scrutiny that is placed on permit
decisions by the various agencies.
Commissioner Norton moved to amend Condition #1 to add the proper description of the deck size
as provided below. Commissioner Craver seconded the motion which passed unanimously.
1. The footings for the proposed 10 foot by 30 foot (300 S.L) deck shall be located landward
of the top of the riprap structure which is approximately 9 feet easterly of the edge of the
paved patio area. No alteration of the riprap structure shall be made for footing placement,
including filL The uncovered deck can extend easterly over the riprap upon obtaining permit
approval by the various resource agencies no further than IO-feet from the eastern edge of
the building, for a maximum 6-feet over the top of the riprap, and upon the submittal of a
reconnaissance study in accordance with Chapter 4(F)(9) of the Shoreline Master Program
to the City of Port Angeles for review and approval, which may result in additional
conditions and/or mitigation measures, and upon Port approval to address maintenance
access.
After a discussion on the wording and explanation by Commissioner Schramm of his intent of
suggesting this condition, Commissioner Philpott moved to amend Condition #2 to remove the word
"all" as provided below. Commissioner Porter seconded which passed unanimously.
.
2. No excavation or construction of the building or deck shall occur until staffreview has been
made and aH-permits have been obtained.
Commissioner Philpott moved to amend Condition #3 to remove the words "building or" as
provided below. Commissioner Schramm seconded the motion which passed 6-1 with
Commissioner Hewins voting against, noting that a comprehensive review of the erosion problems
should occur prior to any construction.
3. Repair of the eroded riprap area requires either a substantial development permit, or
shoreline exemption, depending on the scope of the repair, in addition to other agency
approvals and is not authorized as a part of this permit. Such repair shall be made prior to
any construction of the building or deck.
4.
Commissioner Norton moved that Condition #4 not be amended. Commissioner Craver seconded
which passed unanimously.
Compliance with the P AMC 14.40, Parking Ordinance, is required which may include that
the Port of Port Angeles shall authorize joint use of the parking lot and shall assure that use
of the facilities do not conflict which would result in parking and/or congestion problems.
.
114
.
.
.
Planlllng CommissIOn MInutes
May 9. 200 J
Page 3
Commissioner Philpott moved to amend Condition #5 to remove "Prior to issuance of any building
permit" as provided below. Commissioner Norton seconded the motion which passed 5-2 with
Commissioner Hewins and Chair Nutter voting against. Commissioner Hewins mentioned that this
was and should be standardized wording for all permits.
5. Prim to iSSU2lllC<. of an, buildillg pClnnt appropriate measures shall be made to direct runoff
from existing and new impervious surfaces away from the riprap and erosion area.
Commissioner Craver asked the Commission if it would be appropriate to ask the applicant to
acknowledge their understanding of the revisions. She then asked the applicants if they understood
the changes made by the Planning Commission to the conditions of their shoreline permit.
Dennis Leinaar, Port Angeles Yacht Club, 342 Ridgeview Drive, responded in the affirmative,
and further clarification was provided by the Planning Commission and Director Collins.
A break was called at 8:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened at approximately 8:45. Chair Nutter altered
the agenda to move Item VII before VI. There was no objection.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 8:55, the meeting was adjourned to executive session with the City Attorney for the purposes of
potential litigation. The executive session was expected to last I5-minutes. The Commission
reconvened at approximately 9: 1 0 p.m.
STAFF REPORTS
CP AOI-Ol. Staff provided an updated copy of the CP AO 1-0 1 application noting that a couple
of the revisions proposed by the Nonmotorized Committee were left off the previous version
that was provided to the Planning Commission. Staff provided an overview of the
amendments. A brief discussion followed and several typographical corrections were noted.
Staff noted that action must be taken at the May 23rd meeting in order to forward a
recommendation to the City Council for action by the end of June.
Long Range Planning Items. Director Collins provided an update to the long range
planning schedule that was previous reviewed by the Commission. He added that Clallam
County was leading the efforts of scheduling a joint meeting. Commissioner Nutter noted
that she spoke to Pat Willits, Clallam County Planning Commission Chair, about a topic on
the UGA that included a history and overview of the policies that were adopted. The
Commission directed staff to continue to work out a schedule.
Commissioner Hewins requested an overview of the various downtown planning efforts and
115
Plannrng CommISSIon M,Ir.,Jtes
Page "
staffwas directed to arrange a presentation at an upcoming meeting. Commissioner Schramm .
requested that the animal control ordinance be added. Director Collins suggested the
Planning Commission request that the City Council form an ad hoc committee to draft an
animal control ordinance.
Commissioner Schramm moved to recommend that an Ad Hoc Committee be appointed by
the City Council with a liaison from the Planning Commission to draft an animal control
ordinance which would be a logical next step after the zoning amendments that were made
last year to address keeping of animals. Commissioner Hewins seconded the motion which
passed unanimously.
Other. Director Collins provided an update on the Food Bank street vacation request.
Commissioner Nutter asked for notification of the various meetings related to downtown
improvements. Staff responded that copies would be forwarded. Commissioner Norton
inquired about the status of the zoning code amendment for the portable sawmills. Staff
responded that a copy of the revised code will be provided in the next packet.
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
None
ADJOURNMENT
.
The meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
~~.
Brad Collins, Secretary
-'
UY/Mn _lfTNl4J. ~
~~ Nutter,'Ch;Xr
PREPARED BY: D. Barnes
.
116