HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 06/15/1999 pOR?ANGELEs Upton
_ . City Clerh
WASHINGTON, U.S.A. AGE~
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
321 EAST FIFTH STREET
June 15, 1999
REGULAR MEETING - 6:00 p.m.
Action Taken
A. CALL TO ORDER - Regular Meeting (6:00 p.m.)
ROLL CALL -
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -
PROCLAMATIONS
Swearing in of new police officer David Dombrowski
B. WORK SESSION
Presentation by Promus Hotels
C. LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON THIS OR FUTURE AGENDAS (By Council Staffor Public9 AND
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA (This is the opportunity for members of the
public to speak to the City Council about anything not on the agenda, please keep comments to 5-10 minutes.9
D. FINANCE
Consultant contract for Gateway Project Action
E. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City Council minutes of May 26 and June 1, 1999 Action
2. Authorization to conduct feasibility study for fiber
optics
3. Travel authorization - Finance
4. Voucher list - June 10, 1999 - $1,272,812.99
F. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
G. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS
II. RESOLUTIONS
I. OTItER CONSIDERATIONS
1. Contract to develop and purchase SCADA system Action
for water utility
2. Contract to purchase SCADA sof~ware for WWTP Action
3. Permission to use landfill for testing TOPS Action
process
4. Renewal of property lease to Baron Action
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
June 15, 1999 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - I
AGENDA ITEM ] First I Action? Action Taken
[ ?age I
J. PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER
(7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter)
Close out of CDBG Housing Rehab Phase II! Action
K. PUBLIC HEARINGS- QUASI JUDICIAL
(7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter)
1. Final Assessment Golf Course Road Sewer ULID
215
· Review and approve final assessment roll Action
· Ordinance for final assessments ULID #215 Action
· Ordinance establishing connection charge Action
2. Comprehensive Plan Amendments - CPA 99-01:
A. CPA99-01A - Revision to Figure 10 - Land
Use Map - Reclassification of area occupied by the
Clallam County Housing Authority south of
Lauridsen Blvd/Francis St) from LDR to MDR
B. CPA 99-01B - Revision to Figure I I-
Circulation Plan Map in Comp Plan and Figure 3.2
in the Transportation Services and Facilities Plan
(TSFP), which identifies street classifications city-
wide
C. CPA 99-01C - Revision to Figure 9 -Urban
Growth Area Map east boundary line generally
along Deer Park Road and Buchannan Drive
D. CPA 99-01D - Revision to Figure 3 - Planning
Areas Map to align with Census Tract Boundaries
· Ordinance adopting Comprehensive Plan Action
amendments, A-D
· Ordinance designating city arterials Action
L. INFORMATION
1. City Manager's Report (Page 251)
2. Y2K Insurance Correspondence from WCIA (Page 259)
3. Old Joe Road water line disconnect notice (Page 261)
4. Port Angeles Treatment Plant, NPDES Permit Compliance Inspection Report from DOE (Page 265)
5. North Olympic Peninsula Visitor & Convention Bureau Report - May i 999 (Page 269)
6. Planning Department Monthly Report - May 1999 (Page 283)
7. Public Works Department Monthly Report - May 1999 (Page 285)
8. Fire Department Monthly Report - May 1999 (Page 289)
9. Planning Commission Minutes - May 26 and June 9, 1999 (Page 295)
10. Board of Adjustment Minutes - June 7, 1999 (Page 311)
M, EXECUTIVE SESSION (.4s needed and determined by City Attorney)
N. ADJOURNMENT ]
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public headngs are set by the Ci{y Council in order to meet legal requirements pertaining to matters such as, land use permit applications, proposed
amendments to City land use regulations, zoning changes, annexations. In addition, the City Council may set a public hearing in order to receive
public input prior to making decisions which impact the citizens. Certain matters may be controversial, and the City Council may choose to seek public
opinion through the public hearing process.
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
June 15, 1999 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - 2
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 15, 1999
I. CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING:
II. ROLL CALL:
Members Present:
Mayor Braun
Councilman Campbell
Councilman Doyle
Councilman Hulett
Councilmember McKeown
Councilman Wiggins
Councilman Williams it/
Staff Present: Other Staff Present:
Interim Manager Pittis
Attorney Knutson
Clerk Upton
B. Becker
S. Brodhun V
B. Collins V
Y. Ziomkowski
III. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION:
eas n'
ApprTat~ Len~ ~.,"'
IV. RET~N SESSION:
V. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Led by: x'~o, ~VJg~ J
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Attendance Roster
PLEASE SIGN IN
DATE OF MEETING: June 15, 1999
LOCATION: City Council Chambers
Please Note: IF I plan on testifying by signature below, I certify that my testimony is true and
correct under penalty of perjury by the laws of the State of Washington.
~ ADD.SS, I would like to testify
i i on Agenda Item No,
City of Port Angeles
Ordinance/Resolution Distribution List
City Council Meeting of (~_ ~0 _ /L'::~; [qq~
City Manager
City Atty. (1)
Planning
Cit~ Clerk
o~pu~c~
Personnel
Cust. Svcs.
Finance Dir./M~r.
Police Dept.
~i~D~pt.
Li~Dq,t.
e~t,. Works (2~
Parks & Rec.
MRSC (1)
TOTAL
B. WORK SESSION
Presentation by Promus Hotels
This information will be placed in Council mailboxes
late Friday afternoon for inclusion in Agenda.
PORT ANGELES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
121 East Railroad Port Angeles, WA 98362 (360) 452-2363
June 11, 1999 ~T~ OF PORTANGEi~EI~
. ,C, IT~, ,CLERK ....
Port Angeles City Council
PO Box 1150
Port Angeles WA 98362
TO: Council Members:
The Port Angeles Chamber of Commerce, did on this day pass a
motion to support the concept of the plan by Promus Hotel
(Doubletree, Port Angeles), for a conference facility, to
be built as an addition on the site of the present Doubletree
at 221 Lincoln Street.
We encourage the City to pursue this project. We applaud
Promus Hotels for their constructive thinking to support the
economic growth of this community.
Sincerely,
Mike Millar
President
FAX # 360-457-5380 · www.cityofpa.com · E-mail: pangeles@olypen.com
REPRESENTING THE LARGEST GROUP OF BUSINESSES ON THE PENINSULA
JUN-15-99 TUE 07:4~ AM w*F*~ORML£Y ~60 452 80?2 P.01
City Manaser and the
Port Anseles City Council
6115/99
Please take notice;
Subject,
Public Financing to be a sulJject at the council'c work session 6 PM
Ther~ are five reasons that this any public municipality must refrain for cnterin$ into
any asrecment that uses taxpayers money except for the $ood of all the citizens.
The City of Port should hav~ learnt a lesson whon they gave $40O thousand dollars to
the Waterfront Developers at thc Landin$ and lost it all when the Port took over the
bankrupt improvements paid by the City.
1. The making ofprofil out ofcounty, city, town or other public money or, using
the same for any purpose not authorized by law, by any officer having the possession or
control thereof, shall be a felony, and I~ prosecute and punished as prescribed by law.
Washington State Constitution.
2. No county, city, or town or other municipal corporation shall hereal~er give any
money, or property, or loan its money, or credit to or assist in aid of any individual,
association, company, except for the necessa~ support of the poor and irdirm, or become
directly or indir~tly the owner of any stock in bonds o£association, company or
corporation. Washington State Constitution.
3. Felony charges will be in order to b~ filed by any person with Prosecutor on
such a grievance.
4. The waterfront properties within the city limits are also governed by.
Wash~.gton State Constitution...
ARTICLE XV, HARBORS AND TIDE WATERS
SECTION 1 HARBOR LINE COMMISSION AND RESTRAINT ON' DISPOSITION.
The t,sislature shall provide for the appointment ora conunission whose duty it shall
be to locate and establish h~n'bor lin~ ia th~ navigable waters of all harbors, estuaries, bays
and inlets of this state, wherever such navigable waters lie within or in front of the
corporate linfits ofany city, or within one milo ther~f on either side. Any harbor line so
located or established may thexeat~er be changod, n:loosted or reestablished by the
commission pursuant to such provision as may be made therefor by the legislature. The
state shall n~er give, sell or loase to any private person, corporation, or association any
rights whatever in the waters beyond such haffoor lines, nor shall any of the area lying
between any harbor line and the line of ordinary high water, and within not less than fifty
fe~t nor more than two thousand feet of such harbor line (as the commission shall
determine) be sold 6r granted by the slate, nor its rights to control th~ same relinquish~,
.J~N-15-9~ TUE ,~?:4~ AM W*F*~ORMLEY ~60 452 $0?2 P.02
bu_t_such nrea shall be forever re.fred for landld?_- wharves_. ~ts~ and other
eonvepi~ne~ of navi?llon and ~m~ I~~KNT 1~, 193~
~lion 1. App~yed Nov~m~. 1932,]
S, The County Pm~tor will be com~H~ by the Sta~e ~preme Co~ to lake
appropriate a~ion.
STA~ EX ~L. ~~ v. S~ CT [ ~ Wa. ( 2d ) [ 5 ]
Si~ely,
W~s F. ~ey
citypa-1
Port Angeles Downtown Association
PO Box 582 Port Angeles, WA 98362 (360) 457-9614 Fax (360) 457-0138
June 15, 1999 .
Gary Braun, Mayor il,1 '
City of Port Angeles Council
321 East Fifth Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Dear Mayor Braun and City Council Members:
The Port Angeles Downtown Association's Board of Directors recently had the
opportunity of hearing the proposal by Promus Hotel Corporation regarding a conference
center in Downtown Port Angeles.
We understand that the DoubleTree/Promus proposal requests that the City build a 7500
sq. ft. conference center, on Promus property, at a cost of just over $1 million and that it is
proposed that a major portion of the funding come from Hotel-Motel tax dollars. The use
of these tax dollars would allow the project to be paid for by money generated by visitors
using Port Angeles hotel facilities.
While we recognize the degree of risk with a facility such as this, we are also aware of
other Main Street Communities that have created a puNic-private partnership fbr this very'
purpose. Most familiar to us, is the Wenatchee Center, where we attend the State of
Washington's Downtown Revitalization Conference. This year, three people from Port
Angeles attended the conference at the center that is owned by the City and managed by
West Coast Hotels. Our expenses included registration, three meals away from the
conference center and hotel rooms on the outskirts of Wenatchee, the only space available
with reservations made six weeks in advance. Statistics show that two-thirds of conference
attendees are from out of Wenatchee and spend money on food and lodging. For the va, o-
day conference we lef~ approximately $1000 in Wenatchee.
Downtown revitalization is continuing with business and building owners reinvesting in
Downtown. Currently, over $5 million of private reinvestment is underway, bringing the
total private reinvestment in Downtown to nearly $7 million in two years.
The Port Angeles Downtown Association's Board of Directors supports the concept of a
7500 sq. ft. center and we encourage the City to consider a pre-design analysis to refine
design and cost estimates.
Sincerely yours,
b~'A~Eileen Knigl~
President
PORT
f~l~OF PORT ANGELES
W A S H I N G T O N
June 14,1999
Mayor and City Council
City of Port Angeles
321 E. Fifth St.
Port Angeles, WA 98362-0217
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
The concept of bringing a conference/convention center to Downtown Port
Angeles has been supported by the Port of Port Angeles for many years.
Although efforts to bring a new hotel and conference center to the Oak Street
site have not come to fruition, we still believe that a conference center in
Downtown Port Angeles would be of benefit to all of the local hotel and retail
operators. As such, we believe there will be direct and indirect tax benefits to the
City and County.
We are aware that the City is pursuing a study of the impacts and benefits that a
conference center might provide to the City. We hope that the council will pursue
negotiations with Double Tree (Red Lion) to provide this amenity through a
public/private partnership.
We have appreciated the City's support in the Port's efforts to develop Oak
Street and look forward to working with the City in the future towards these
enhancements to the Downtown.
Sincerely,
BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS
D ~ Jack Waud Glenn Beckman
President Vice-President Secretary
338 West First Street (360) 457-8527 COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
P.O. Box 1350 Fax: (360)452-3959 Glenn Beckman M. Christine Anderson
Port Angeles, WA 98362 portofpa@olypen.com Dick Foster CITY699.DOC
Jack Waud
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
])ATE: June 15, 1999
TO: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jack Pittis, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Consultant Agreement, Port Angeles International Gateway Transportation Center
Issue: Approval of an consultant agreement with the architecture firm ofMerdtt + Pardini to provide design
services and to prepare plans and contract documents for the Port Angeles International Gateway
Transportation Center Project 97-20.
Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement consistent with the attached scope,
subject to City Attorney's ai~proval, with the negotiated fee not to exceed $67:3,691.00.
Background/Analysis:
The City and Clallam Transit System (CTS) have completed scope and cost negotiations with the architecture
firm ofMerritt + Pardini to provide design services and to prepare plans and contract documents for the Port
Angeles Intemational Gateway Transportation Center Project 97-20. The final consultant agreement language is
being reviewed by the Federal Transit Authority (FTA), CTS, Transportation Improvement Board (TIB), and the
City Attomey. The attached scope, cost breakdown, and schedule have been reviewed by the Gateway Steering
Committee and have recommended approval of the agreement.
The $4,500.000 project funding is comprised of nearly $3,000,000 in FTA and $1,500,000 in TIB grants. The
consultant fees and costs are in line with recent City projects similar in size and/or complexity as shown on the
attached cost analysis. Based on an estimated project size of $4,500,000 the architect's basic fee would be 8.5%
of the total cost which is consistent with a project of this size and complexity. The 10% markups on subcontractors
and reimbursables are standard. The additional services for this project are significant but necessary to meet the
requirements of the federal and state grants, environmental requirements, economic development, and specific
project needs. Some of the additional services for graphics, models, and added economic work are optional. The
need for these optional services will be reviewed by the steering committee during the design of the project and
the work will not be started unless the architect is directed in writing.
Attachments: Scope, cost and schedule
Cost analysis
Lo~: G:~EXCHANGE\CNCLPKTLPLrB WKS\CCCNSLT.WPD
File: 97-20.04A
Merritt+Pardini
Architecture
Urban Design
Planning
Interior Design
April 16, 1999
PORT ANGELES INTERNATIONAL GA TEWA Y
TRANSPORTATION CENTER PROJECT
SCOPE OF WORK (DRAFT #2)
GENERAL CLARIFICATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS
1. Scope of Work for Tasks 1.0 (Start-up) and Task 1.1 (Predesign) has been outlined in
detail below and on attached consultant written scopes. Subsequent Tasks such as
Environmental, Design and Construction phases will be reevaluated for potential level of
effort modifications as necessary, due to conclusions of Predesign effort.
2. Scope of Work is based on an anticipated construction budget ora $2.5 mil. multi-modal
n-ansportation project and related amenities. Projected timeline is attached and
summarized as follows:
NTP 5/15/99
Predesign 5/15/99 - 8/15/99
Environmental 7/1/99 - 11/25/99
Design 11/25/00 - 7/1/00
(includes Owner reviews and Value Engineering)
Permit Period 6/1/00 - 7/1/00
Bid/Award Period 7/1/00 - 8/1/00
Construction 8/15/00 - 8/l 5/0 l
Merritt+Pardini would like to reevaluate and revise scope and associated
compensation to reflect any extended schedule, scope, budget, or other
unforeseeable increases. Such modifications will be approved upon Owner's written
authorization.
3. Design Task includes assumption that Lindberg Architects will provide bidding services
such as bid document handling / mailing and addenda handling / mailing.
lz01 Commerce 4. Drawings during design will be provided as AUTOCAD drawings. Specifications during
Tacoma, Washington
9~402-3207 Design will be prepared by the Merritt+Pardini design team and will include coordination
(253) 383-87O0
(253) 383-8728 Fax and inclusion of Division 0 (General Conditions) from the Owner.
10O0 Lenora St.
Suite 223 5. Contract between Owner and Architect is assumed to be A/A B 14 l, 1997 edition, with
Seattle, Washington
98121-2720 potential modifications.
(2O6) 622-945O
(206) 622-9462 Fax
Members of
The American
Institute of
Archilects
1 04/19/99
2
Task f.O. PROJECT START. UP
A. Project Setup/Mobilization
Scope of Work preparation and meetings
· General project setup and administration.
· Collect and review existing drawings, surveys, reports and studies.
· Prepare previous work for presentation at Workshop #1
B. FTA Review (See attached DSV Scope of Work)
C. Routing Analysis (See attached DSV Scope of Work)
Deliverables:
1. Scope of Work
Task 1. ~ - Predesign
Ob. jective: Establish the vision, goals, design criteria, space program, and project budget..4lso
develop.financmg plan and economic development plan. Evaluate and select a preferred
site and preferred alternative design for subsequent direction into environmental work
and Design Phase.
A. Community Outreach Planning and Implementation
1. Our community outreach planning approach could utilize many forms of advertisement and
public outreach methods. Merritt+Pardini would like to strategize with the Review Committee
to determine the most effective community outreach approach for this project.
2. Create a Strategy Memorandum outlining goals, objectives, and action plan.
3. Assist in implementation of action plan:
Includes: attendance and presentation at two (2) group meetings
B. Workshop gl (1-2 days - Site and Concept Identification)
1. Present and review project givens.
2. Confirm project goals and objectives from previous work
3. Confirm/discuss desired facility image
4. Confirm general project issues, opportunities, constraints and expectations
5. Summarize information for use in programming document
6. Identi~y potential funding opportunities / strategies
7. Evaluate potential sites and determine preferred site
Confirm all current and projected crew and staffto be accommodated at facility
9. Identify overall project budget
10. Evening workshop for public input
2 04119/99
3
C. Documentation of Issues
1. Collate information for use m Predesign report and at next workshop
2. Document decisions made for subsequent use
D. Workshop #2 {1-2 days - Alternative Concept Evaluation/Refinement)
Objective: Explore and test potential site plan configuration alternatives incorporating required
program elemems including structures, parking areas, furore development opportunities, storm
detention, off-site work, etc.
1. Evaluate and test alternatives against building, site, and operations criteria developed in
Workshop #1. Reduce alternatives to minimum workable solutions (2) for subsequem cost
evaluation.
2. Review conceptual site plan configurations and adjacency diagrams in conjunction with site
plan alternatives.
3. Evaluate alternatives against proposed financing and economic developmem plans.
4. Evening workshop for public input.
E. Develop Predesign Level Cost Estimates and Life Cycle Costs (See C3MG Scope)
Objective: Develop and evaluate cost models for each site development alternative selected ill
Workshop #2. The cost model attd life cycle cost wdl be developed and presented in Uniformat for 2-3
alternatives as follows:
(Note: It is anticipated that following workshop #2 there will be 2 or 3 basic site development
alternatives, each with potential sub-options.)
1. Foundations (footing, piling, etc.)
2. Substructure (concrete slabs, base, etc.)
3. Superstructure (structural frame system)
4. Exterior Closure (siding, windows, doors, etc.)
5. Roofing (Roof materials, flashing, gutters & downspouts)
6. Interior Construction (wall construction, surfaces, accessories, etc.)
7. Convoying Systems (elevators, lilts, etc.)
8. Mechanical (FIVAC, plumbing, drainage, oil/water separation, etc.)
9. Electrical (power, lighting, generators, communications, alarms, etc.)
10. General Conditions (Contractor's Overhead and General Condition Costs)
11. Equipmem / Furnishings
12. Site Work (utilities, storm drainage, site grading, landscaping, surfacing, etc.)
3 04119/99
4
' T .......... Ill IFII'
F. Concept Refinement
1. Develop alternative concepts and funding/financing/econ. Development plans further for
evaluation at Workshop #3
G. Workshop #3 (1 - 2 days - Evaluate Alternative Concepts/Select Preferred Alternative(s))
Objective: Evaluate development costs and Life Cycle Costs for the two potential site alternatives
determined in Workshop #2. Evaluate refined alternatives of the two preferre& Select
preferred alternative concept(si.
1. Evaluate costs for previous alternatives
2. Concept Development
3. Select Preferred Concept (or Combination of Elements)
4. Test preferred concept against proposed financing and economic developmem plans
5. Update Cost Model and Life Cycle Costs for preferred concept
6. Evening workshop for public comment and input
1. City Council, PADA, and CTS Board presentation as required
Deliverables: (as a result of workshops)
I. Prepare final site plan drawing(s) of preferred concept showing the proposed development of
structures, driveways, roadways, landscaping, utilities, storm detention and other significant
site elements.
2. Prepare final cost estimates, Life Cycle Costs, Project Costs, Schedule, drawing package,
workshop notes, for inclusion into a Predesign Report.
lt. Financing/Funding Plan {see DSV scope of work)
I. Economic Development Plan {see Ravenhurst scope of work)
J, Preliminary Site Civil/Surveying/Traffic/Environmental {See PMX and NTI scope of work)
K. Agency Review and Permitting
1. Research / Confirm Agency Requirements
2. Confirm all reviewing agencies / departments having jurisdiction.
3. City, state, etc.,
4. Confirm required site permitting process and adopted standards / ordinances, etc.
5. Confirm drainage requirements.
6. Confirm critical areas information and requirements.
7. Confirm zoning and existing site permitting (i.e., non-conforming or conditional use, etc.)
8. Confirm Land Use Permitting
9. Confirm NEPA/SEPA process and timing as needed
10. Work with review agencies to evaluate site development alternatives.
4 04/19/99
5
11. Attend pre-developmem meetings with review agencies to review preferred site development
akemative(s).
12. Schedule: Confirm target dates for presentations, land use permit submittals, predesign
completion, and design / construction phases.
L. Committee Study Sessions / Council Decision Meetings / CTS Board Meetings
1. Attendance and presentation at two (2) committee study sessions during scoping and
workshops.
2. Attendance and presentation at two (2) council decision meetings and two (2) CTS board
meetings.
M. Geotechnical Work (See Landau Scope of Work)
3. Prepare preliminary data from available geotechnical and geoligical data
4. Plan and provide field work to include borings, test pits, etc.
5. Provide soils analysis and recommendations for foundations, pavemem, drainage, liquifaction,
etc. via a soils report.
N. Predesign Summary Report
Objective: Prepare a "Predesign Summary" Report documenting all information and decisions
resulting from workshops and programmmg. The report will establish the
preferred direction for proceeding with the formal design phase.
Outline of Report Contents:
1. Executive Summary
2. Introduction
3. Programming and Space Criteria
4. Preferred Concept Site Development
5. Project Budget and Schedule
6. Design Criteria - Site and Building(s)
7. Funding / Financing Plan and Imegration Strategy
8. Economic Developmem Plan and Integration Strategy
9. Appendices
Deliverables 1. Draft Predesign Rep~{rt and drawings for Owner's review and comment.
(Number of copies: (R) comb bound.
2. Final Predesign Report and drawings. (Number of copies: (~'3-ring bound.
(Note: Predesign Report will be minimum preparation of resulting documents, drawings, etc. from
workshops.)
Rather than spend time redrawing sketches, word processing written legible notes
from workshops, and producing multiple summary documents, Merritt+Pardini will
attempt to save time in report preparation by collating and inserting documents as
they are (reduced to 8/12x 11 or 1 l x 17) into the appendix portion of the report.
5 04/19/99
Tasl; 2.0 - ENVIRONMENTAL WORK (See PMX, NTI, DSV, and EYsaman
Scopes of Work)
A. Environmental Documentation
Objective: Conduct environmental analysis and prepare documentation to comply with NEPA,
SEP, d, FTA, and Endangered Species Act (ESA) guidelines.
Environmental review for the project will be conducted to comply with NEPA, SEPA, FTA, and ESA
guidelines, and other applicable regulations. Environmental review would involve a variety of technical
analyses, reporting, and coordination with Clallam Transit, City of Port Angeles, PADA, FTA, ESA
other agencies, and the public. This process is based upon completion of the Predesign phase with
preferred and alternative development concepts.
Recommend Environmental Process
The appropriate environmental process will be determined through a review of any existing relevant
environmental reports, meeting with client and staff'to discuss and confirm a preliminary scope for the
environmental analysis, and further development of the preliminary scope through agency coordination.
NEPA regulations and FTA guidelines for NEPA compliance (UMTA C 5620.1) will be the primary
determinants of the scope of environmental review. Coordination with FTA will be required to
determine if the project is considered a Class 1, 2, or 3 action. Class 1 actions normally have a
significant impact on the environment and thus require an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
Class 3 actions are those for which the significance of the impacts on the environment are not clearly
established and for which an Environment Assessment (EA) is prepared to determine the probable
impacts. Class 2 actions would not entail significant impacts and would require neither an ElS nor an
Environmental Assessment. These are called Categorical Exclusions (CE).
For the purposes of this proposal, it is assumed that the project would be considered a Class 2 action
and will require preparation of Documented Categorical Exclusion. However, there is potential that an
Environmental Assessment with supporting documentation may be required depending on the
environmental impacts. It is also expected that SEPA requirements can be met through the adoption of
the NEPA document. An Environmental Assessment is not included as a pan of this Scope of Work.
B. Historic Building Inventory (See Eysaman & Company Scope of Work)
Provide a historic building inventory that covers the area from the west side of Lincoln to the east side
of ~aefi3,, fi.om the water's edge on the north to the bluff on the south.
6 04/19/99
Task 3.0 - DESIGN
A. Preliminary Design Submittal (30% Complete)
(Objective: Provide a 30% design level submittal for review and comment by Review Committee,
Authority Board, and City Council.)
1. Draft Soils report
2. Survey Coordination (see NTI scope)
3. Traffic (see Parametrix scope)
4. Prepare 30% design plans
5. Submit to Owner for informal review
6. Prepare 30% cost estimate (See C3MG scope)
7. Preliminary design review
8. Draft Reports (soils, drainage, structural, etc.)
9. Review Operational Impacts (See DSV scope)
10. Review Design vs. Economic Development Plan (See Ravenhurst Scope)
B. Progress Submittal (60% Complete)
(Objective: Provide a 60% design level submittal for review and comment by Review Committee
ami or stafjO
1. Progress plans
2. Progress specifications
3. Progress cost estimate
4. Progress submittal review
C. Complete Design Submittal/Permit Submittal (95% Complete)
(Objective: Provide a 95% design level submittal for review and comment by Review Committee,
Authority Board, and Oty Council and for permit submitta0
1. 95% complete plans (Permit level)
2. 95% complete specifications
(Owner to provide Division 0 "boiler plate" portion of spec.)
3. Calculations as needed for each discipline will be provided
(pavement calcs., structural calcs., lighting energy, irrigation, etc.)
4. 95% complete cost estimate
5. 95% design submittal review
6. Final Reports (soils, drainage, structural, etc. for permit level)
Drawings, specifications, reports, etc. will be submitted by the Merritt +Pardini team. The
Merritt+ Pardini team will be responsible for all permit applications, submittal halutling and
delivering, contact with plans examiners, coordination, etc. Merritt + Pardini will provide support in
answering questions, responding to review comments according to the level of effort outlined itt
compensation matrix.
7 04/19/99
8
D. Final Submittal- Bid Documents (100% Complete)
(Objective: Provide a 100% design level submittal for review attd comment by Review Committee,
Authority Board, and City CounciO
1. Final plans
2. Final specifications
3. Final cost estimate
Final documents may not reflect responses to permit submittal due to timing of plan review.
E. Contract Document Bidding
(Objective: To provide complete bidding services to Owner as outlined below and itt/dA BI40
1. Print and distribute bid documents, collect bid set fees, and return fees to Owner.
2. Respond to questions and clarifications from bidders
3. Respond to substitution requests
4. Prepare and distribute addenda to plan holders as needed.
5. Attend one prebid meeting at project site or City facilities.
6. Assist Owner in evaluating bid results and in evaluation of low bidder credentials.
Provide plans and specifications 'to successful bidder
Task 4.0 - CONS TRUC TION ADMINIS TRA TION
(Objective: To provide construction administration services in accordance with Article 2. 6 of 1997
AIA B141 requirements. Lmberg scope of work identifies daily site visits and weekly stntctured
meetings, at least through the critical construction times, a~ bi-weekly otherwise. Dady site visits
are proposed as needed also. Meeting mimtte recording at site meetings are assumed to be provided
by General Contractor (GC) or Owner. If Merritt+ Pardmi is requested to provide this service and
runs job site meetings, a separate taxable Construction ~qdmin. Contract would be required, according
to state Icea,.)
Task 5.0 - ADDITIONAL SERVICES
(Objective: The following items are recommended services that the Merritt + Pctrdini team considers
important to the project.)
A. Value Engineering (To be performed by others between 30% and 60% submittals)
1. Merritt+Pardini will provide coordination and administration services only in conjunction
with outside consultant (i.e., describing project to VE team, answering VE team
questions, reviewing VE recommendations with Owner, meeting with consultants lo
discuss and evaluate VE team recommendations)
B. 3-D Computer Graphics (See Aspen scope of work)
1. Consultant meeting attendance
2. Adjacent existing conditions coordination
3. Computer modeling fi'om Merritt+Pardini provided drawings
Deliverables
1. Drat~ progress drawings of selected views
2. Final colored images of 4-5 views as selected by Owner.
8 04/19/99
C. 3-D Study Model (by Merritt+Pardini)
1. Chipboard/cardboard study model of preferred concept
Deliverables
1. Draft versions and progress drawings of selected views
2. Final colored images of 4-5 views as selected by Owner.
D. Additional Coordination / Administration
4. Coordination and Administrative efforts for additional services consultants
Aspen Computer Graphics
The computer graphics require additional coordination meetings and communication with
consultant performing the work, the Owner, and other parties involved. This time is in
coordinating details of views, sending and receiving information fi.om consultant, color
coordination, etc. o£3-D graphics. Since we recommended this service as additional, we
proposed our related efforts as an additional service as well.
3-D Study Model
Similar to above, the 3-D model will require additional coordination meetings and
communication within Merritt+Pardini, the Owner, and other parties involved. Since we
recommended this service as additional, we proposed our related efforts as an additional
service as well.
END OF SCOPE OF WORK
Ihb/PA/mpscope
lO 9 04/19/99
II lilill lilllll
II I iii
II Itl il ' Il IIIll
II ' lilt II ?i~. llll
Il Illll I fill Illl
Il :lllll[
I I~1: IIIII1"/11t~1111
.................................... I"T"I'TT'TTT'T'tit",TT'I'T/'I
/lllllllllll/'.l/i, I l I I II Ill'
...................... ~l--l--l---l.-4--l---lt!~l---l-:-l--l-l--kl---I ............... l---l--kl I I I 1
'In. ti II II~lll:ll~ll I
· 11 I~ltl.~l~l :1 I l lllllll
~11.1~1~1~1111'1111111 III IIII
_ IIIII//////l/ II I IIIIIIII
1:2
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
May 26, 1999
CALL TO ORDER - The City Council joined the Clallam County Public Utility District Commissioners and
SPECIAL MEETING: the Clallam County Economic Development Council to hear a presentation on
telecommunications and fiber optics. The meeting commenced at approximately 1:30
p.m.
ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mayor Braun, Councilmembers Campbell, Doyle, Hulett,
Wiggins, and Williams.
Members Absent: Councilmember McKeown.
P.U.D. Representatives S. Burgett, M. Mclnnes, B. McCrorie, H. Haffner, T.
Present: Simpson, F. Mitchell, and J. Burke.
City StaffPresenr' J. Pittis, C. Knutson, B. Titus, and S. McLain.
Others Present: J. Michalczik and B. Myers, Utility Advisory Committee; R.
Fleck, City of Forks; and K. Harper and K. Khan, R.W.
Beck.
Telecommunications Telecommunications and Fiber Optics:
and Fiber Optics
The purpose of the meeting was to hear a presentation from consultants, R. W. Beck,
on state-of-the art technology as relates to telecommunications and fiber optics.
Discussion was held with regard to the options that might be considered, as well as the
advantages to bringing this technology to the North Olympic Peninsula.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at approximately 5:30 p.m.
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk Gary Braun, Mayor
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
June 1, 1999
CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Braun called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order at
REGULAR MEETING: 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mayor Braun, Councilmembers Campbell, Doyle, Hulett,
McKeown, Wiggins, and Williams.
Members Absent: None.
StaffPresenr' Interim Manager Piths, Attorney Knutson, Clerk Upton, B.
Becker, S. Brodhun, B. Collins, S. Ilk, J. Pittis, Y.
Ziomkowski.
Public Present: C. Smith, M. Kenney, D. Shideler, L. Lee, E. Knight, and
M. Turner.
PLEDGE OF The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Finance Director Ziomkowski.
ALLEGIANCE:
CEREMONIAL 1. Swearing in of New Police Officers Barb Morrison and David Dombrowski
MATTERS/
PROCLAMATIONS: Police Chief Ilk advised the Council that Mr. Dombrowski would be sworn in at the
next Council meeting. He then introduced Barb Morrison, the City's newest police
Swearing in New officer, and Mayor Braun administered the oath of office to Officer Morrison.
Police Officers
Report on VCB Marketing 2. Presentation by Rick Hert of Flyer Advertising Port Angeles and Status Report
Program on VCB Marketing Program
Rick Hert, Executive Director of the North Olympic Peninsula Visitors and Convention
Bureau (VCB) introduced Ann Tucker, President and CEO of Wendt Advertising, Mike
Millar, President of the Port Angeles Chamber of Commerce, and Lou Ann Yager,
secretary for the Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Hert updated the Council on the VCB's
accomplishments to date, inclusive of a publication and two workshops.
Mike Millar stated that the Chamber has been handling the inquiries generated from the
marketing program. More than 1,000 responses were received from the advertisement
in "Sunset Magazine". Mr. Hert reminded the Council that there is also a toll free
number for people to call who are interested in visiting the Peninsula.
Ann Tucker display.ed enlargements of the ads used in the advertising campaign, which
was launched in March with transit boards. The campaign was designed to familiarize
people with Port Angeles as a destination. Mr. Hert briefly reviewed the initial
problems with the radio campaign which he felt ended successfully. Ms. Tucker
reformed the Council that an ad had also been placed in the Victoria Vacation Planner
and, in collaboration with Forks and Sequim, an ad was placed in the Washington
Accommodations and Lodging Guide.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 1, 1999
Report on VCB Marketing Mr. Hert thanked the Council for its mist in allowing the Chamber and VCB to perform
Program (Cont'd) this service for the City; he felt they had been good stewards of the money. Mr. Millar
noted that this was an opportunity for the Chamber, VCB, and other City agencies to
work together.
Councilman Wiggins reminded the Council of the goal to increase hotel/motel
occupancies. Mr. Hert informed the Council that preliminary tourism figures for
Clallam County were up 10% through the end of April, 1999, and Port Angeles is
showing a 2% increase. Ms. Tucker stated conversions studies would be performed in
the fall, and a report will be given when the figures are available. Discussion followed,
and Mr. Hert and his colleagues responded to questions and provided clarification.
WORK SESSION: Fire Chief Becker reported to the Council on the City's Y2K preparedness. Staff has
been working hard to ensure a smooth flow into the new millennium. He explained that
City of Port Angeles Y2K Y2K is not a single event. The Gardner Group, an international technology consultant
Readiness Plan firm, gave testimony to the U.S. Senate indicating that, in 1999, about 25% of all
computer systems will experience some Y2K difficulties. In the year, 2000, there may
be up to 50% of the systems experiencing some difficulties. ChiefBecker reviewed the
various dates of the year during which difficulties may be experienced.
Chief Becker enumerated the various planning factors which had to be considered in
preparing for Y2K. The North American Electric Liability Council is in charge of
ensuring electric utility transmission into the year 2000 by testing now. The results
indicate there will be minimal difficulties from Y2K for the electric utilities. Chief
Becket described other tests being performed to guarantee Y2K compliance in
communications and banking.
Indicating there is no way to 100% test for all contingencies, Chief Becket related that
the City's goal is to maintain a maximum level of acceptable service and have no
disruption to vital public service during the Year 2000 conversion. He then described
the steps staffhas already taken and what steps will be taken in the near future to enable
the City to make a smooth transition.
At Councilman Campbell's request, Chief Becker and Attorney Knutson explained the
City's legal liability limits in the event there is a power failure, etc. Mayor Braun
thanked Chief Becker and staff for the efforts put forth on this issue, and he asked for
further input as relates to anticipated banking problems. ChiefBecker was comfortable
that banking would continue without problems. He advised the Council that discussions
will have to be held in the future regarding Y2K mitigation expenses, and he explained
what some of those expenses would entail. Chief Becker explained that most of the
purchases necessary for Y2K would also be necessary in the event of any natural
disaster, such as an earthquake. Councilman Doyle felt it might be more appropriate
to refer to emergency preparedness instead of Y2K, as it is basically the same.
Further discussion ensued and, at Councilman Hulett's request, Chief Becket reviewed
the readiness of the communications systems. Interim Manager Pittis stated staffwould
bring back the issue of non-budgetary items to a future meeting.
LATE ITEMS TO BE Councilman Wiggins asked to discuss the gun safety issue, which was added as Item
PLACED ON THIS OR No. 6 under Other Considerations.
FUTURE AGENDA:
FINANCE: 1. Award Bid for ,]ones Street Reservoir Cover
Jones St. Reservoir Cover Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department, and
Interim Manager Pittis provided a history of this issue. At Councilmember McKeown's
request, City Engineer Kenworthy and Interim Manager Pittis discussed the process
CITY COUNCIL MEgI1NG
June 1, 1999
Jones St. Reservoir Cover incorporated in determining the Engineer's Estimate. Councilman Wiggins moved to
(Cont'd) award the bid for the Jones Street Reservoir Cover Project No. 98-16 to the lowest
responsible bidder, Aldergrove Construction of Port Angeles, in the amount of
$268,300.90, including tax. Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion, which
carried unanimously.
'T' Street Sidewalks 2. Bid,4 ward for the 'T' Street Sidewalks Project
Project
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department. City
Engineer Kenworthy distributed a map denoting which streets would benefit from the
various options being placed before the Council. Mr. Kenworthy explained that the
engineer's estimate was $125,000 higher than the original budget of $150,000, largely
based on the storm drainage modifications to catch basins, as well as the extension of
storm drain lines. The project was bid with the different additives, so as to give Council
an option when awarding the bid. Discussion ensued and, at Councilman Wiggins'
request, Director Ziomkowski explained additional funds could be acquired from Street
Fund reserves or the Real Estate Excise Tax.
Following further lengthy discussion regarding costs and possible additional allocation
of funds, the opinion was expressed that the additional expenses should not be incurred
at this time but, rather, it was felt that the TIB should be asked to re-rank the remaining
portion of the project. In addition, with the upcoming process for the Capital Facilities
Plan, the remainder of this project should be included in the discussions establishing
priorities. Therefore, Councilman Campbell moved to award the bid for the "I"
Street Sidewalks project No. 98-10 to the lowest responsible bidder, Strider
Construction of Bellingham, for the Base Bid in the amount of $149,200.
Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion. Following further discussion and
clarification, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
West 13th Street Sewer 3. Bid Award for West 13th Street Sewer Main Replacement Project
Main Replacement
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department, and
Interim Manager Piths provided additional input. Discussion followed, and Engineer
Kenworthy and Interim Manager Piths responded to questions and provided
clarification.
Councilman Doyle moved to award the bid for the West 13th Street Sewer Main
Replacement Project No. 99-10 to the lowest responsible bidder, C & J Excavating
of Sequim in the amount of $61,313.37. Councilman Williams seconded the
motion, which carried unanimously.
CONSENT AGENDA: Couneilmember MeKeown moved to accept the Consent Agenda, including: 1)
Travel authorization - Finance Department, and 2) City Council minutes of May 18,
1999. Councilman Wiggins seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
CITY COUNCIL Councilman Doyle attended a Victoria Parmership meeting in Victoria, B.C. The
COMMITTEE purpose of the meeting was to discuss the possibility of parmering for off-shoulder
REPORTS: tourist business. Councilman Doyle attended the Elwha/Morse Creek watershed
outreach meeting at the Elwha Tribal Center; he deferred that report to Councilman
Victoria Partnership Campbell.
Elwha River/Morse Councilman Campbell attended the public meeting for the outreach program for the
Creek Watershed Elwha River/Morse Creek watershed planning. More than sixty people attended, and
caucus representatives were selected and a first meeting scheduled. Councilman
Marine Life Center Campbell attended and was impressed by the grand re-opening of the Marine Life
Center; he lauded the efforts of Councilmember McKeown for making this happen.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 1, 1999
CITY COUNCIL Mayor Braun, along with Councilmen Campbell and Wiggins, attended the Peninsula
COMMITTEE College team building course. He, along with the rest of Council, attended the joint
REPORTS: (Cont'd) meeting with the PUD to discuss fiber optics. Mayor Braun read a proclamation
Team Building / opening the Juan de Fuca Festival of the Arts and had a discussion with Glenn Goldberg
Festival of the Arts / and John Reed, who would like to address the Council regarding GUTS and possible
GUTS Presentation funding.
Mayor Braun asked to move the "Art on the Town Project" up on the agenda to
accommodate those present who wished to speak to this issue.
Break Mayor Braun recessed the meeting for a break at 7:40 p.m. The meeting reconvened
at 7:57 p.m.
Art on the Town Other Considerations
4. Art on the Town
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by Human Resources and asked
Interim Manager Pittis for additional input. Interim Manager Pittis stated there would
be a presentation by Arla Holzschuh and others, after which, Bob Coons, Human
Resource Manager, would elaborate on the impacts to the City's budget should the
Council approve the agreement.
Aria Holzschuh, Executive Director of the Port Angeles Downtown Association
(PADA), thanked the Council for the opportunity to address this issue. Ms. Holzschuh
especially thanked Interim Manager Pittis, Administrative Assistant Phyllis Rasler,
Manager Coons, and Attorney Knutson for all the help they provided in preparing
tonight's presentation. Ms. Holzschuh introduced Eileen Knight, President of the Board
for the PADA; Charles Smith of Lindberg and Smith, Design Chairperson; Michael
Kenny, Chairperson for the Art on Town project; and Bob Harbick.
Ms. Holzschuh explained that the art on display for this project would be on loan from
each artist for one year. The pieces will be displayed outdoors and are for sale. The
PADA will purchase one piece of art each year, which is donated back to the
community. Individuals can also purchase art and donate to the community. New art
pieces will be displayed each year. Ms. Holzschuh summarized how the program was
born and how the pieces will be displayed. The show is promoted as a walking tour.
She described how the program has worked and what was accomplished in other cities.
Ms. Holzschuh described the steps taken by the PADA to get to this point, which
included a Mission Statement, and she described the organization's goals and how the
PADA hoped to achieve them.
Ms. HoLzschuh explained the insurance issues regarding protection of the art pieces and
stated there will be a waiver on small damage done to the cedar sculpture. Insurance on
the art for a small organization like the PADA would be approximately $4,000 per year.
Therefore, the City is being asked to help with insuring the art, as it can be added to the
City's umbrella policy for much less.
Ms. Holzschuh then introduced Charles Smith, who addressed building and design. Mr.
Smith informed the Council that Lindberg and Smith Architects has been working on
the pedestal designs for the art pieces. Of one concern was continuity throughout
downtown. Mr. Smith then described the types Of pedestals that would be used.
Michael Kenny, 139 W. First Street, then spoke to the matter of local children as artists
within the community. Mr. Kenny described the art work which will be donated by the
North Olympic Sculptures. Seven artists have created seven masks cast in bronze. Mr.
Kenny displayed pictures of the art work under discussion and described the other
-4-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 1, 1999
Art on the Town (Cont'd masks which will complete this project. When finished, this artwork will be donated to
the City as part of the Art on the Town project.
Another part of the project involves the art work of children. Two groups of students
will complete a mosaic project. One will be an outdoor theme featuring campers,
divers, etc. The second group will make a mosaic salmon. Mr. Kenny explained how
the mosaics will be created, framed, and displayed. At Councilman Wiggins's request,
Mr. Kenny explained how the art work would be protected from vandalism. Mayor
Braun thanked Ms. Holzschuh, and Messrs. Smith and Kenny for their time.
Manager Bob Coons stated he had spoken to other municipalities with outdoor art, and
vandalism has not been a problem and no insurance claims have been filed. It will cost
the City less than $100 per year to purchase the insurance coverage necessary, with the
only risk to the City being the $5,000 deductible. However, should someone vandalize
several pieces of art at one time, the deductible would only apply once. Discussion
ensued, with questions asked and clarification provided, especially regarding the risk
of vandalism.
Councilmember McKeown moved to co-sponsor "Art on the Town", including
insurance coverage of the art in the City's policy, and authorize the Mayor to sign
an agreement with the Downtown Association. Councilman Williams seconded the
motion, which carried unanimously.
Annexation - Turner 2. Request to Circulate an Annexation Petition ANX 99-02 Turner, Old doe Road
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Planning Department. At
Mayor Braun's request, Director Collins provided additional information and used the
overhead projector to demonstrate the area under consideration. Discussion followed,
and Director Collins responded to questions and provided clarification regarding the
pre-annexation zoning process to rezone the property for commercial use, despite the
County's objection. Attorney Knutson explained that the County would have the right
to appeal the rezone prior to finalization of the rezone, and he reviewed that process
involved.
Margo Turner, 3904 S. Reddick Road, spoke in support of the annexation and informed
the Council that the land cannot be developed without City services. She believed that
the County was incorrect in zoning this land residential urban low density, as the
downhill grade requires large commercial vehicles to apply compression brakes, which
can be quite loud.
Councilman Doyle moved to approve circulation of an Annexation Petition ANX
99-02, including assumption of existing bonded indebtedness and allowing for a
pre-annexation zoning process, citing Findings 1-10 and Conclusions A-C as set
forth in Exhibit "A", which is attached to and becomes a part of these minutes.
Councilman Campbell seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Personnel Justification 5. Personnel dustification - 911 System Coordinator
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Police Department. At Mayor
Braun's request, Naomi Wu, Communications Manager, explained the importance of
filling this position which would be funded by the County 911 phone tax. Discussion
followed, and staff responded to questions and provided clarification. Concern was
expressed over Y2K compliance and whether the City would bear the total expense of
the position or if it would be shared with the County. Councilman Wiggins moved to
authorize the creation of the position, the establishment of a current eligibility list,
and the hiring of a qualified individual. Councilman Williams seconded the
motion, which carried unanimously.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 1, 1999
Search Warrants for Code Ordinances Not Requiring Public Hearings
Violations
Ordinance No. 3019 1. Ordinance Providing Process for Obtaining Search Warrants for Code
Violations and Clarifying the Repeat Offender Provisions for Nuisance
Violations
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the City Attorney's office and
asked Attorney Knutson for further information, which he provided.
Mayor Braun read the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 3019
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
providing for the issuance of administrative search
warrants for inspections on private property, clarifying
the nuisance ordinance's "repeat offender" provisions,
and amending Ordinances ! 792 and 2469 as amended
and Chapters 1.20 and 8.04 of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code.
Councilman Hulett moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. Councilman
Campbell seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Conversion of LID 215 to 2. Ordinance Approving Conversion of LID 215 into a ULID 215
ULID 215
Ordinance 3020 Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Finance Department and asked
Director Ziornkowski for additional input, which she provided. Mayor Braun read the
ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 3020
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
converting Local Improvement District No. 215, created
pursuant to Ordinance No. 2939 to finance sanitary sewer
improvements within the Upper Golf Course area of the
City, to a utility local improvement district.
Councilman Campbell moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. Councilman
Hulett seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Designating Oracle as Sole Resolutions Not Requiring Public Hearings:
Source for Certain
Software Resolution Designating Oracle as Sole Source for Acquiring Database Management
Resolution No. 11-99 Software for the City's Financial and Geographic Information Software Systems
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the City Attorney's office and
requested further input which Attorney Knutson provided. Limited discussion ensued,
and staff responded to questions and provided clarification. Mayor Braun read the
Resolution by title, entitled
RESOLUTION NO. 11-99
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Port Angeles, Washington, designating Oracle
Corporation and its authorized local dealer
Paladin Data Systems corporation as the sole
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 1, 1999
Designating Oracle as Sole source for acquisition of database management
Source for Certain products for the City's financial and geographic
Software information software systems.
Resolution No. 11-99
(Cont'd) Councilman Williams moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. Councilman
Wiggins seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Attorney Knutson asked Council to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract with
Paladin as the amount is over the City Manager's authority limit of $15,000.
Councilman Hulett moved to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract with
Paladin. Councilman Doyle seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Trade Forest Services Land Other Considerations
in Exchange for Private
Lands 1. Discussion of a Potential Trade of Forest Services Land in Exchange for the
Private Lands Surrounding the Elwha Dams.
Councilman Wiggins referred to Page 33 of the packet and stated that, while this was
a County issue, it was also of concern to the City. Continuing to have private land
surrounding the City leads to a better economic climate. Councilman Wiggins
explained that a trade of public lands in the National Forest for the private lands of Fort
James would serve to assure that the tax base would not be eroded by increased
government ownership of land on the Olympic Peninsula. Congressman Dicks has
indicated he would support this issue if it is what the local people wanted. Councilman
Wiggins felt the Council should recommend the trade to the County. Discussion
followed, and Councilmen Campbell and Wiggins responded to questions and clarified
the issues.
Councilman Doyle moved authorize the Mayor to sign a letter to the County
supporting the trade of Forest Services land for private lands surrounding the
Eiwha Dams. Councilman Wiggins seconded the motion. Discussion followed, and
it was suggested a copy of the letter also be sent to the Port of Port Angeles and the
Lower S'Klallam Tribe. A vote was taken on the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Consultant for 8th Street 3. Approve Consultant Selection for Design of 8th Street Reconstruction
Reconstruction
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department, and
Interim Manager Pittis provided additional information and a history of this restoration
project. Councilman Campbell moved to authorize the Public Works Department
to enter into scope and cost negotiations with the firm of Harding Lawson and
Associates {HLA) to provide engineering services for the 8th Street Restoration
Project No. 99-08, and authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement, subject to City
Attorney approval, of a negotiated fee not to exceed $287,500. Councilman Doyle
seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Gun Safety 6. Gun Safety
Councilman Wiggins reminded the Council that this had been discussed recently and
tabled without action. He informed the Council that the bill discussed did not reach
passage during the recent legislative session; however, it may be brought forward again
next year. Councilman Wiggins stated Police Chief Ilk had provided him with a list of
bills in Congress which includes the same gun safety issue. Councilman Wiggins did
not feel this bill would make it in the House, but he wished Council to be aware of it.
Interim Manager Pittis suggested Council discuss this with its peers at the next AWC
Conference.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 1, 1999
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None.
QUASI-JUDICIAL:
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None.
OTHER:
INFORMATION: City Manager's Report
Interim Manager Pittis stated that any one who did not have a chance to view the new
fire truck could see it at the fire station. He reviewed the Year 2000 Budget Schedule
and process and the status of the Marine Sanctuary.
Appointment to Technical At Interim Manager Piths' request, Director Collins announced that Dick Goin had been
Review Committee recommended for appointment to the Technical Review Committee for the North
Olympic Salmon Restoration Coalition. Discussion followed about the technical
knowledge needed for such a position, and it was pointed out that Mr. Goin had a
number o£ years experience in this regard. The Council felt he had the necessary
qualifications to perform well in this position.
Following further discussion, Councilman Wiggins moved to appoint Dick Goin to
the Technical Review Committee for the North Olympic Salmon Restoration
Coalition. Councilman Doyle seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Building Code Board Interim Manager Pittis reviewed the information contained in the packet and asked
of Appeals Council how it wished to proceed as regards Mr. Bondy. Discussion ensued.
Councilmember McKeown was of the opinion that City residents should be appointed
to board and commissions whenever possible. She suggested the position be advertised,
and Mr. Bondy be allowed to continue to serve in the meantime. Councilman Williams
suggested the people who live in the urban growth area be allowed to seek appointment
to City Boards and Commissions.
Councilmember McKeown moved to ask Mr. Bondy to retain his position for a
minimum of 90-days and have the City Clerk advertise the vacancy on the Building
Code Board of Appeals and, if the position remains unfilled, Mr. Bondy be
retained. Councilman Wiggins seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Interim Manager Pittis reviewed the information contained in the packet and asked
Council how it wished to proceed as regards Mr. Norton. Attorney Knutson informed
the Council that there was no legal issue involved in one person serving on two Boards.
It was the general consensus of the Council that Mr. Norton be asked to serve on both
boards.
Hood Canal Bridge Interim Manager Piths reviewed the information contained in the packet, and discussion
Toll Meeting ensued. Councilman Williams volunteered to be the Council representative at this
meeting.
5th & Tumwater Interim Manager Piths stated that the Design Report has been received for the Fifth and
Tumwater slide repair. There are two alternatives, the first is to place a retaining wall
at the edge of the slide area to stabilize the slope. This will cost approximately
$108,000. Another alternative involves moving the roadway further into the hillside
and acquiring property. This option would cost approximately $125,000. Staff
recommends proceeding with the first option, constructing a retaining wall. He asked
Council to authorize advertising the project when ready. Interim Manager Piths
reviewed .the steps that would be taken following that procedure, as well as the
reimbursement possibilities.
CITY COUNCIL MEEIING
June 1, 1999
5~ & Tumwater Discussion followed, and Mayor Braun reminded the Council of the importance of
(Cont'd) completing this project as soon as possible. Councilman Wiggins moved to accept
option one, to build a retaining wall, and authorize staff to advertise the project.
Councilman Campbell seconded the motion. Discussion followed. A vote was taken
on the motion, which carried unanimously.
Carnegie Library Interim Manager Pittis provided a status report on the Carnegie Library and noted a
change order was signed today to provide for the concrete steps. He explained why this
was not part of the original contract and reviewed the cost to date. Interim Manager
Pittis reviewed the steps that will be taken to complete the project once the facade has
been restored. Discussion followed, and Interim Manager Pittis responded to questions
and provided clarification.
Future Council Items Interim Manager Pittis pointed out that the packet contained a list of future Council
agenda items.
ADJOURN TO The meeting adjourned to Executive Session at 10:20 p.m. to discuss labor negotiations,
EXECUTIVE SESSION: personnel, and litigation for 45 minutes to an hour.
RETURN TO The meeting returned to Open Session at 12:00 a.m,
OPEN SESSION:
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 12:00 a.m.
Becky I. Upton, City Clerk Gary Braun, Mayor
24
pORtA ¢ L... s
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: June 15, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY CoUNcIL
FROM: Jack Pittis, Director of Public Works
S~JECT: Authorization for Fiber Optic Feasibility Study
Issue: City involvement in telecommunications and fiber optics..
Recommendation: Staff, with UAC concurrence, recommend that the City Council go on record as
supporting limited City involvement in telecommunications and fiber optics and authorizing staff to issue
an RFP for a feasibility study.
Summa~: Telecommunications and fiber optics are increasingly important factors in retaining and attracting
businesses. Municipal government and its utilities are also finding more and more internal uses for high speed
communications between facilities. Thus more and more municipalities and publically owned electric utilities are
getting into the telecommunications business. With US West installing fiber to the Peninsula by the end of this
year, having a hybrid fiber community network in the City would enable local businesses to have direct access to
interstate communication hubs in Seattle. Now is the time for the City to seek strategic partners and determine
the feasibility of moving our community into the information age as first class citizens.
Background / Analysis: City involvement in telecommunications and fiber optics was first raised as an issue in
the City Light Strategic Plan over a year ago. Since that time a number of electric utilities and municipalities have
taken steps to involve themselves in the emerging telecommunications industry. Thc attached memo, sent to the
City Manager in March, details many of the reasons why it makes sense for the City to consider future
involvement. On May 26, 1999 representatives from RW Beck made a presentation on telecommunications and
fiber optics. The full UAC and most City Council members were in attendance and lots of good questions were
asked of the presenters. At the end of the handout that was distributed at the meeting was a section on developing
a practical action plan. An outline of their recommended process is attached.
Staff has attended several seminars and has looked into some aspects of providing telecommunications
infrastructure and/or fiber optics. Staff has also held informal discussions with US West, the PUD and the EDC.
These discussions have been very general because at that point the City Council had not been asked nor had they
given any indication that they would like staff to formally pursue the issue of City involvement in
telecommunications and fiber optics. The next step is too formalize an action plan and have a feasibility study
completed to determine the desirability of the City getting into the telecommunications business, at least to the
extent of providing the infrastructure either directly or in partnership with others. The 1999 Budget includes
$10,000 for this study.
Attachments: Plan and memo
N:~PWKS~LIGHT~DIRECTOR~MEMOS\TELECOM.WPD
25
DEVELOPING A PRACTICAL ACTION PLAN
1. Initiate Effort
a. Dedicate necessary internal resources
b. Select outside assistance
c. Develop detailed work plan
d. Select other regional parties who wish to participate
e. Set realistic expectations
2. Conduct Initial Research
a. Identify what other utilities and municipalities are doing
b. Identify legal/regulatory constraints
c. Evaluate technology alternatives
d. Identify potential operational savings
e. Identify potential revenue opportunities
f. Identify current and potential competitors
3. Complete Feasibility Study
a. Select preliminary set of applications
b. Develop conceptual system design
c. Identify all costs and benefits
(1) Operational efficiencies
(2) Improved customer service
(3) New revenue streams
d. Develop preliminary financial projections
e. Conduct sensitivity analysis
4. Develop Draft Business Plan
a. Develop mission statement
b. Develop short-term and long-term objectives
c. Develop marketing strategy
d. Develop technology strategy
e. Develop operations strategy
f. Develop organizational plan
g. Develop risk mitigation strategy
h. Identify target strategic partners
5. Develop Detailed System Design
a. Finalize selection of technologies
b. Finalize system design
c. Develop protocols
d. Complete detailed cost estimate
6. Conduct Pilot Programs
a. Test all criteria parameters
b. Select relevant size, demographics and topology
c. Carefully assess results
d. Document lessons learned
e. Feed results back into planning process
7. Refine Business Plan
a. Incorporate lessons learned
b. Revise business plan
c. Secure necessary approvals to proceed
8. Full Implementation
a. Roll out technology, operations, and marketing plans
b. Monitor results
c. Make mid-course corrections as necessary
26
Po :A.N¢ L S
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
DATE: March 30, 1999
ME M O To: Patrick Ibarra, City Manager
FROM: Bob Titus, Deputy Director of Utility Services
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT RE: Telecommunications and Fiber Optic Oppommities for Port Angeles
Jack Pittis
Director [4801] High-speed, wide-bandwidth telecommunication systems are a huge asset to those communities
Phyllis Rasler who have one and an impediment to economic development for those communities without
Administrative Assistant one. Access to high-speed, high capacity data networks is increasingly high up on the list of
I48001 amenities that an industry looks for in a potential site for relocation or expansion. For any
Cate Rinehart progressive community the question is not whether they need one but rather who can provide
Administrative Assistant
[47001 the infrastructure in a cost effective manner. In our region, U.S. West and municipal electric
utilities have been the primary providers of such services.
Ken Ridout
Deputy Director [4802]
U.S. West is upgrading its facilities and installing new fiber optic lines and new switches in
Bob litus
Deputy Director [47011 many areas. They are motivated by the prospect of greater profits through the offering of
additional services and the fact that with deregulation of the telecommunications industry, the
Gary Kenworthy
City Engineer [48031 possibility of competition. However, there is a limit to the amount of capital that can be spent
in any given year and they will invest in areas with the greatest return on their investment.
Jim Harper
Electrical Engineer [4702] Rural areas like Clallam County are not high priority areas because of the limited population,
Lou .aehnlen low customer density and lack of likely competition. We would eventually get upgraded
Building Official t40161 services but the question is when.
Tom Spedine
Sr. Ele~ri~al Inspe~or t473S] That leaves City Light as the most likely provider of a fiber network in the next few years. Here
Scott UcLain the issues are deciding to get involved in a business that could be in competition with the
Power Manager [4703]
private sector and justifying the costs. Cities like Tacoma, Richland and Ellensburg (in
Ralph EIIsworth
Water, Wastewater Collcngtion Washington State) and Springfield and Eugene (in Oregon State) are examples of cities that
Superintendent [48551 have municipal electric utilities that are installing fiber optic networks.
Pete Burrer
Equipment Services
Superintendent[4835] Electric utilities often have the need for real time communications with remote sites for
Mark Shamp SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) and in the future could use a data network
Light Operations Manager [47311 for automated meter reading and load control. Beyond these applications, some utilities are also
Kevin Curtis opting to utilize their telecommunications network to get into new business lines (cable tv,
Treat. Plant Supervisor [4845] intemet access, home security, etc.) or leasing excess capacity for these services. Another factor
Tom McCabe that is influencing municipal utilities is the benefits of a fiber optic network for general
SW Collection Supervisor [4878]
government.
Steve Evans
Landfill Supervisor [4873]
Port Angeles is currently looking to acquire a new SCADA system for the water utility. A
Dave Wilcox
.'~t Maintenance Supervisor SCADA system already is in place (but with communications problems) for City Light.
t4825] Ultimately, there are plans to install SCADA at the pump stations, reservoirs, valves,
substations, sewer treatment plant and landfill. Although not the cheapest option, a fiber optic
27
network could tie all of these sites together (with the Corp Yard, City Hall and Light Ops) and
would provide backbone facilities to virtually all areas of the City. The incremental ct f
additional capacity (bandwidth) is fairly low so surplus capacity could be installed to provide
for other users.
The State is likely to have funding available for telecommunications/rural development later
this year. Those cities that know what they want to do will be in the best position to tap into
this funding source. At the same time those cities who actually install a system will have an
edge in attracting new business to their area. It would seem prudent to have the utilities (mainly
City Light) fund a feasibility study for Port Angeles so we can determine what costs would be
like and who potential customers for excess capacity might be. I would estimate this would cost
$20,000-$30,000. At the very least I think we need to work more closely with the PUD, US
West, Northland and other telecommunications users to keep up to date on what others axe
planning. As in other endeavors, we can best insure that the City's interests are met by taking
charge of the planning/implementation process and not leaving it to others with broader or
different interests.
28
pORTANGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: June 1, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY OF PORT ANGELES COUNCIL
FROM: Yvonne Ziomkowski, Finance Director
Tanya O'Neill, Information Services Manager
SUBJECT: Travel exceeding $750 - Oracle Education Service and Support
Training Seminar - Bellevue, WA - June 14 - June 25, 1999
Issue: Should the Finance Systems Specialist attend the Oracle Education Service and
Support class in Bellevue, WA? Current policy requires Council approval for travel exceeding
$750.00.
!Recommendation: Approve travel costs for class attendance.
Background /Analysis: The Oracle Education Service and Support Class #A-131,
A-132 and Oracle Administration A-133 will be held in Bellevue, WA from June 14 - June 25,
1999. The class provides an excellent opportunity for continuing education and professional
training and an update of todays technology. This is one of five (5) required classes to qualify for
a Oracle DataBase (DBA) Certification.
Information Services has been attempting to schedule this class and availability was always
limited or non-existent. A cancellation permitted the City of Port Angeles to be the next on a
long waiting list. In the best interest of the City of Port Angeles the lass was scheduled.
Following is a breakdown of the costs for the class:
Class Session (less 25% discount) $3,281.25
Lodging - ! 0 nights ~ $104.00 1,098.20
Meals- 10 days ~ $34.50 345.00
Total $4,815.45
The total cost to the Finance Department budget is $4,815.45. The costs were budgeted for in the
1999 budget process.
29
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 1
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
001 51092 Data Acquisition Inc. 04038 Repairs/maint-Data collectors 1 2370000 28.05-
51097 Direct Safety Company 04279 Safety glasses I 237(XX)0 6.02-
51104 Fire Mad Northwest 06223 Ambulance cot, credit trade-in 1 2370000 193.55-
51111 ICMA Product Fulfillment Cntr. 09021 1999 Municipal Year Book 1 2370000 5.37-
51129 Newbridge Educ. Programs 14430 Seasonal packs-May days 1 2370000 1.38-
51141 Quill Corporation 17000 Pens, sheet protectors 1 2370000 6.19-
Tape, printer labels, ribbon 1 2370000 8.04-
Ribbon, video tapes, cassettes 1 2370000 16.35-
51159 WA State Patrol - WASIS 23281 Criminal history-E Howell I 2295000 24.00
51160 WA State Patrol - WASIS (HA) 23359 Criminal history-K Gibson 1 2295000 24.00
51177 Aegis Protection Group, The 01409 Crime Prevention Manual I 2370000 5.97-
51191 BATH / Connectronix Corp. 02442 AS400 adapter card I 2370000 22.76-
AS400 adapter card I 2370000 22.76-
51199 Cayman Graphics 03472 Power CG Lite Software 1 2370(0)0 7.~-
51256 Our Designs Inc. 15116 Volunteer Fire member emblem I 237(X)00 5.~-
51323 ARTnews 01311 Annual subscription renewal I 2370(0)0 3.16-
51344 Clallam County Treasurer 03075 CVCA remittance-April I 22940(X) 331.32
51348 Creedmoor Sports Inc. 03475 AR-15 Video, cleaning rod 1 237(X)00 5.37-
51363 Marine Rescue Products Inc 13419 Spinebo~rd, immobilizer,straps I 2370D(03 35.18-
51403 Washington (GA), State of 23346 Emergency food-disaster prepar 1 2370(0)0 33.90-
5144)4 Washington State Treasurer 23120 Revenue remittance-State Share I 2293000 16,~1.29
51439 Fire Instructor Testing 06224 Fire Dept testing software I 2370000 36.20-
51~ Mity-Lite Inc. 13443 Stack chair, chair dolly I 237(X)00 ~.04-
51465 Moore Medical Corporation 13(~3 Synetron gloves I 23700(X~ 10.83-
51493 Washington (DOL), State of 0/,137 May 1999 Firearm licenses I 22960~ 161.(X)
Total for Department 16,047.98
O(N)I 51071 Advanced Travel 01090 Coons to Yakima 5-4-99 113 4310 398.22
Braun to Sequim 4-29-99 112 4310 10.54
51073 Angeles Temporary Services 01076 C. Phyllis Tapp pe 4-30-99 113 4150 1,079.76
51080 Bonny's Bakery 02298 Council refreshments 112 3101 108.00
51086 CliniCare of PA Inc. 03080 Employee X-rays, drug screen 113 4131 339.00
51089 Creative Delights Catering 03347 Cetering-Svc Award luncheon 113 4150 1,416.18
51139 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement 112 3101 2.14
Petty cash reimbursement 113 4310 8.25
51182 Angeles Communications Inc 01069 Add extension 5156 Council Vid 112 4210 ~.56
51199 Cayman Graphics 03472 Power CG Lite Software 111 3101 106.83
51220 Gina's Bakery 07132 Interview lunches-PW Director 112 3101 20.02
51252 Olympic Printers Inc. 15027 Mailing labels 111 3101 30.32
Mailing labels 113 3101 30.32
Council packet covers 112 3101 319.11
51254 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030 Mole punch, cover stock,markers 113 3101 7'5.61
Paper 111 3101 19.42
Paper 113 3101 3.24
Post-it pads,copy paper,clips 111 3101 41.97
.-- Envelopes 113 3101 37.87
Money receipts,shears,dispense 113 3101 3.86
Disk file, folders, post it fl 113 3101 61.34
51258 Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 160(0, Maintenance agre-NP6412 April 111 ~I0 32.37
Maintenance agre-NUP08604 111 4810 32.37
31
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - YZK LIVE June 10 1999 Page
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/0B/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
Ink 111 310~ 68.52
Credit Deskjet ink 111 3101 34.26-
Deskjet ink 111 4155 207.01
Printer ink-City Newsletter 111 4155 202.80
Printer ink 111 4155 71.11
Toner 111 3101 85.24
51260 Paymentech 16421 P Ibarra purchases-April 111 4310 184.50
C McKeown purchases-April 112 4310 30.81
51265 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement 113 4310 18.72
5127-/ Ridgeway, Mike 18324 From Mark Vanderziel in-Lieu 113 3101 125.00
51281 Safeway Inc. 19045 Coffee, film, cookies 111 3101 26.91
Coffee, cookies 111 3101 24.94
Cookies 111 3101 19.78
Cookies 111 3101 16.95
Cookies 111 3101 16.95
51296 Terryberry 20002 Service pins 113 4150 1,~.38
51306 Virginia Mason Hospital 22048 Drug screen-Dombrowski 113 4131 33.83
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 Harch Scan charges 113 4210 19.76
March Scan charges 111 4210 27.22
March Scan charges 111 4210 179.0B
April Scan charges 113 4210 26,56
April Scan charges 111 4210 4
April Scan charges 111 4210
51316 Xerox Corporation 24001 DC214S Lease agre-March 111 4530 70.94
51324 AWC Assn of Washington Cities 010~) Registration-O Campbell 112 4310
Registration-G Wiggins 112 4~I0 250.00
Registration-J Hulett 112 4310
51326 Advanced Travel 01090 G Braun to Sequin,Victoria 5-6 112 4310 24.{)4
51346 CliniCare of PA Inc. 03080 Pre-employment physicals-Parks 113 4131
51379 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement 111 3101 5.92
51390 Seattle Times/PI-N. Pruznick 19161 3 mo Subscription-April-June 111 4901 26.40
51400 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 111 4210 137.39
5-14 Billing 113 4210 91.59
51408 AWC Assn of Washington Cities 010~ Registr-Pittis,Doyle,Williams 112 4310 634.00
51414 AWC Assn of Washington Cities 01080 AWC Conference Dinner-Hulett 112 4310 25.00
51426 Captain T's 03048 Embroidery 111 4155 21.04
51474 Olympic Memorial Hospital 15028 Pre-employment physical-McCurd 113 4131 149.05
51495 Waterfront Art Gallery 23191 Framing-Jack Pittis Retirement 111 4150 190.71
51497 Xerox Corporation 24001 DC214S Lease agre-April 111 4530 87.75
Total for Administration 9,984.13
{X)02 51071 Advanced Travel 01090 Ziomkowski to Chelan 4-6-99 230 4310 296.4~+
51091 Dania 042B1 Desk for Karen Papandrew 230 3101 39B.56
51098 Diversified Industries 04052 Copy Center Svcs-April 99 205 4150 1,210.0{3
51107 Gov't Finance Officers Assn 07003 Register-Ziomkowski,Papandrew 230 4310
51119 MTA of the US & Canada 13303 Application fee-Y Ziomkowski 230 4150 175~
51132 Olympic Delivery Service Inc. 15020 Delivery services-April 240 4150 16~
51139 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement 200 9624 19.90
Petty cash reimbursement 201 3101
Petty cash reimbursement 201 3101 8.87
32
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 3
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08~1999 To06/I0/1999
Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Humber Number
51141 Quill Corporation 17000 Tape/ printer Labels, ribbon 201 3101 7~.24
Tape, printer Labels, ribbon 230 3101 25.02
Tape, printer labels, ribbon 2/+0 3101 11.53
51142 Retail Lockbox Inc. 18258 April lockbox charges 240 4150 36.00
51145 Safeguard Business Systems 19359 Utility bill laser forms 240 3101 4,623.03
51158 Viking Office Products 22054 Binder clips,pens,post its,box 201 3101 17.83
Binder clips,pens,post its,box 230 3101 99.12
Binder clips,pens,post its,box 240 3101 41.57
51216 Federal Express Corp. 06022 Shipping services-April 240 42.10 11.15
Shipping services-April 230 4210 5.55
51251 Olympic Paper Company 15111 Paper 201 3101 156.99
Paper, greenbar paper 205 3101 314.20
Paper 205 3101 58.91
51252 Olympic Printers Inc. 15027 Envelopes 240 3101 911.54
Stamp-Non negotiable 230 3101 16.19
Mailing labels 201 3101 30.32
Mailing labels 230 3101 30.32
Mailing labels 240 3101 242.58
Deposit slip-Lock box 240 3101 162.34
Envelopes 240 3101 1,380.96
Travel request forms 230 3101 258.85
Business cards-Kheriaty,Papand 230 3101 26.22
Business cards-Kheriaty, Papand 240 3101 26.22
51254 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030 Paper 201 3101 32.36
Paper 240 3101 32.36
Paper 205 3101 430.37
Rulers 230 3101 1.42
Name plate 230 3101 16.62
6el wrist pad, binding combs 201 3101 73.70
Labels, presentation covers 201 3101 61.55
Labels, presentation covers 205 3101 18.89
Paper 230 3101 32.36
Paper 240 3101 32.36
Paper 205 3101 32.35
Money receipts,shears,dispense 201 3101 9.12
Money receipts,shears,dispense 2/+0 3101 8.25
Honey receipts,shears,dispense 201 3101 4.39
Money receipts/shears,dispense 230 3101 24.0~
51258 Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 16004 Drafting table rental 240 3101 13.49
51265 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement 201 3101 18.34
51275 Retail Lockbox Inc. 18258 Adjusted April lockbox 240 4150 534.05
51276 Richmond 2-#ay Radio 18009 Pager battery 240 3101 5.39
51308 Washington (DIS)/ State of 23111 March Scan charges 201 4210 18.39
March Scan charges 230 4210 31.18
March Scan charges 240 4210 21.91
April Scan charges 201 4210 17.16
April Scan charges 230 4210 59.88
April Scan charges 240 4210 20.56
MS Select License Activity-Apr 240 ~810 698.14
51312 Washington (Unemp), State of ~178 1st Qtr t999 unemployment 240 2060 330.00
51316 Xerox Corporation 2/~01 DC2305LX Lease agre-Narch 205 4530 377.18
33
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 4
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Cc~e Amount
Number Name Number Number
51328 ALL FLags Travel Inc. 01015 Airfare-Ziomkowski/Papandrew 230 4310 564.00
51362 Lucent Technologies 12215 Telephones-Bryant, Papandrew 230 3101 179.13
51379 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03C~2 Petty cash reimbursement 230 3101 10.85
Petty cash reimbursement 201 3101 33.90
51399 US Telecom 21070 Software & Support Maint-4-00 240 ~10 253.57
51400 US West Communications 21001 5-14,Billing 201 4210 91.59
5-14 Billing 230 4210 114.49
5-14 Billing 240 4210 274.78
51426 Captain T's 03~ Polos,mock turtle necks,embroi 230 3101 55.83
51478 Retail Lockbox Inc. 18258 May lockbox charges 240 4150 721.30
51~ Washington (Auditor), State of 19270 Audit services-April 230 4150 20,896.20
51492 Wash. Institute Foundation 23~2 Registration-S Kenyon 240 4310 60.00
51497 Xerox Corporation 24CX~1 5800 Duplicator lease agre 205 4530 7,628.03
Total for Finance 45,5~.60
00{)3 51143 Ritchie & Strohmeyer 18242 Legal Svcs File #M611099ca-PCR 311 5090 279.00
51165 West Group 23018 Legal publications 311 3101 295.~
51247 Office of The Code Reviser 15019 Subscription renewal 311 3101 210.60
51252 Olympic Printers Inc. 15027 Mailing labels 311 3101 30.32
51254 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030 Paper 311 3101
51258 Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 16004 Toner 311 3101 7
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 March Scan charges 311 4210 25.ol
April Scan charges 311 4210 26.67
51316 Xerox Corporation 24001 DC220SLX Lease agre- March 311 4150 340.52
51342 City of Federal Way 03478 Legal expenses-judgment action 311 4150 2,750.00
51355 Gateway Companies Inc 07195 Computer, memory, printer 311 6410 3,~6.40
51400 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 311 4210 160.29
51429 Clallam Jefferson Public Ofndr 03274 Public Defender fees for June 311 4150 2,500.00
Total for Arty Wastewater 9,817.55
0004 51071 Advanced Travel 01090 Collins to Seattle 4-23-99 411 4310 300.15
Collins to Tumwater 4-22-99 411 4310 22.50
Sawyer to Seattle 4-25-99 411 ~10 537.32
Nutter to Seattle 4-25-99 411 4310 490.~
51223 HartnageL Building Supply Inc. ~52 Melamine 411 4810 84.60
Hex key set/ teak lumber 411 4810 32.74
51252 Olympic Printers Inc. 15027 Mailing labels 411 3101 30.32
51254 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030 Pens, markers, letter guides 411 3101 22.52
51258 Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 16004 Toner 411 3101 63.~
Labeler 411 3101 15.11
Labler 411 3101 15.11
51263 Peninsula Daily News I(=012 Notice-Jobe, HirtzeL 411 ~410 51.~
Determination-S Hoffman 411 4410 42.90
Determination-Splitrock Comm 411 4410 49.92
Determinatn-Budget Rent A Car 411 4410 51
Permit notice-McPhee 411 4410 2
Determination-Boys & Girls Clu 411 4410 39.70
Determination-Vision blinders 411 4410 38.~.
4 Determination-Housing Auth 411 4410 41.34
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y~K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 5
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
Determination-City of PA 411 4410 63.18
Determination-Hason 411 4410 41.34
Notice-Shoreline permit 411 4410 24.18
Determination-PA Cemetery 411 4410 41.34
Notice-Brad Collins 411 4410 43.73
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 Narch Scan charges 411 4210 51.07
April Scan charges 411 4210 23.68
51326 Advanced Travel 01090 B Collins to Seattle 4-16-99 411 4310 19.00
51400 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 411 4210 91.59
Total for Planning 2,350.84
0005 51071 Advanced Travel 01C~)0 Baertschiger,Miller to Wenetch 530 4310 455.67
Ilk to Las Vegas 4-25-~ 511 4310 671.23
Lowell to Tukwila 5-2-99 530 4310 7(30.14
51083 Clallam County Sheriff's Dept. 03074 Inmate care for March 1999 530 5009 18,257.12
51105 GTE/ERS Inc. 07005 Calibrate/repair radar 530 4810 151.05
51123 AT&T Messaging now Netrocall 20000 4-24 Billing 530 4210 59.75
51128 National Assn School Resource 1444~+ Registration-J Vieda 530 4310 395.00
51134 Olympic Memorial Hospital 15028 Medical svcs-C Swogger 530 5099 129.6~
51141 Quill Corporation 170(0) Pens, sheet protectors 530 3101 ~.50
5117T Aegis Protection Group, The 01409 Crime Prevention Manual 530 3101 81.47
51182 Angeles Communications Inc 01069 Repair darmaged wire, ext 4943 534 4210 4~.55
Repair damaged wire, ext 4943 534 ~10 48.56
51191 BATM / Connectronix Corp. 02442 AS400 adapter card 534 3501 310.76
51198 Camera Corner 0304/+ Processing prints 530 49~K) 52.22
Processing 530 4990 29.~
51206 Database Technologies Inc 04283 April Autotrack Billing 530 4150 110.47
51213 English, Self Storage Monte 05190 Truck rental 5/19-5/20/99 530 4990 104.22
51214 Evergreen Collision Center Inc 03207 Towing services 530 4150 ~.56
51225 Henry DDS, Robert F 0&~64 Dental Svcs-B Holloway 530 5099 97.(X3
51240 North Olympic Peninsula 14127 Recjistr-Gallagher,Baertschiger 530 4310 ~.~
51252 Olympic Printers Inc. 15027 Business cards-Tom Kuch 530 4990 52.44
51254 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030 Paper 534 3101 64.71
Wall calendar 530 3101 8.41
Paper 534 3101 64.72
51258 Pacific office Equipment Inc. 16{304 Maintenance &gre-NPlO20 April 511 4~10 32.37
Maintenance agre-NP3050 April 534 4810 53.95
Maintenance agre-NP6230 April 534 4810 167.35
Maintenance agre-CXL90926 511 4810 32.37
Maintenance agre-NBZ08561 534 ~I0 53.95
Maintenance agre-NGM21820 534/~810 167.35
Toner 534 3101 69.06
Toner 534 3101 69.06
Surge powertracker, label tape 530 3101 89.50
Scanner 530 3101 242.78
Toner 530 3101 63.66
Sound card 530 3101 59.35
Back-up tapes 534 3101 101.97
51261 Pen Print Inc. 1~ Statements-Police Oept 534 4990 155.38
Senior Volunteer brochures 534 49~)0 114.91
35
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 6
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To~/I0/1~
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Ccxle Amount
Number Name Number Number
51262 Peninger, Tyler 16171 Reimburse uniform allowance 530 2080
51276 Richmond 2-Way Radio 18009 Add relays, labor 5304810 84.16
Plug 530 4150 19.42
51288 Solutions Group, The 19476 Credit for Tile -Evidence room 530 6410 527.89-
Mobile Storage system, tile rod 530 6410 27,7-/4.36
51295 Swain's General Store Inc. 19037 Boots 530 2080 134.7~
Uniform-shoes 530 2080 134.7n5
51302 United Parcel Service 21005 Shipping services-May 530 4210 36.71
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 March Scan charges 511 4210 18.92
March Scan charges 534 4210 11.89
March Scan charges 530 4210 70.08
April Scan charges 511 4210 30.54
April Scan charges 534 4210 11.74
April Scan charges 530 4210 52.86
51312 Washington (Unemp), State of 23178 1st Qtr I~ unemployment 533 2~0 428.32
51313 Washington Fire & Safety Equip 23004 Service extinguisher, powder 530 49~0 25.90
51326 Advanced Travel 01090 T Kuch to Bremerton 5-6-99 530 4310 13.75
Riepe,Turton-Des Moines 5-12 530 4310 19.00
E Kovatch to Marysville 5-20 530 4310 10.00
Riepe,Gallagher-Everett 5-18 511 4310 12.35
G Turton to Ellensburg 4-26-99 530 4~10 118.~.~
51332 Angeles Chips Away & Detailing 01363 Detail police vehicle 533 4810 10~
51343 Clallam County Humane Society 03072 May 1999 contract payment 530 4150 3,391.,u
51348 Creedm~r Sports Inc. 03475 AR-15 Video, cleaning rod 530 3101 ~.29
51400 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 511 4210 160.29
5-14 Billing 534 4210 114.49
5-14 Billing 530 4210 22.90
51402 WA State Patrol 23057 Video tape analysis, repair 530 4150 39.96
51403 Washington (GA)/ State of 23346 Emergency loewi-disaster prepar 530 3101 462.90
51417 Blumenthal Uniforms & Equipmt 02047 Belt 530 2080 24.92
Uniform-pants, pocket, shirt 530 20~) 138.90
Pants, pocket, sewing services 530 2080 219.80
Drug testing kits 530 3101 108.4~
Uniform-Pants 530 2080 121.11
51426 Captain T's 03~ Polo, embroidery 530 3111 26.30
51428 Ctallam County Sheriff's Dept. 03074 Inmate care for April 19~79 530 5099 17,360.46
51465 Moore Medical Corporation 13~3 Synetron gloves 530 3101 147.83
51477 Port Angeles Police Department 16105 Petty cash reimbursement 530 4210 70.87
Petty cash reimbursement 530 3101 13.20
Petty cash reimbursement 511 3101 1.35
Petty cash reimbursement 530 3111 25.00
514~ US West Communications 21001 5-20 Billing 534 4210 219.65
51490 WA Assn of Sheriffs & Police 23003 Accreditation Manager training 530 4310 15.(X)
Total for Police 75,~.74
(X)06 51068 AT&T Wireless Services 01404 5-1 Billing ~ 4210 12
51071 Advanced Travel 01090 Wheeler to Ocean Shores 5-2 611 4310
Richmond,Manning,Adamich to N (>45 4310 204.(X)
Twitchell to Gig Harbor 5-3 641 4310 285.90
51079 Bcxjues, Keith 02165 Reimburse clothing allowance 641 20t~) 224.12
36
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - YZK LIVE June 10 1999 Page 7
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
51104 Fire Mad Northwest 06223 Ambulance cot, credit trade-in 643 6/+10 2,643.55
51111 ICMA Product Fulfillment Cntr. 09021 1999 Municipal Year Book 6~+5 3101 ~.32
51123 AT&T Messaging now Metrocall 2(X)00 4-24 Billing ~+44210 24.24
51180 All Phase Electric Supply Co. 01(~51 Fluorescent light ballast ~ J. BIO 271.91
51188 Angeles Temporary Services 01076 V Elliott pe 5-15-99 ~ 1(X)3 203.97
51190 Avery's Cameras 11016 Film 642 3101 6.45
Processing 642 3101 8.03
Film 642 3101 10.78
51223 Hartnagel Building Supply Inc. 08052 Ceiling tile 684 3120 37.92
51234 M & P 6arage Doors 13100 Realign doors, change track 6~t+ 6410 2,054.42
Remote receivers, repair door 6844~10 776.88
51236 Middleton Auto and Truck Inc. 13117 Car wash 6~+1 3101 37.76
51237 NWPPA 14013 R~istration Electric Industry 645 4310 50.00
51240 North Olympic Peninsula 14127 Registration-B Becker,D McKeen 645 4310 40.00
51250 Olympic Laundry & Clnrs Inc. 15026 Cleaning services 641 4990 25.25
51254 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030 Paperclips, disk mailers 611 3101 8.53
Binders 648 4157 25.49
51256 Our Designs Inc. 15116 Volunteer Fire member emblem 644 3111 ~7.~
51258 Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 160(0+ Toner 611 3101 106.82
51273 Region One Training Council 18101 Register Flammable Liquids-Pet 64>45 4310
51276 Richmond 2-Way Radio 180(0 Repair headset 643 3114 12.13
51282 Schmitt's Sheet Metal Irc. 19007 Sheet metal, labor 684 4810 152.95
51284 SeaWestern Inc. 19104 Lens 641 3501
Pass device with heat 641 3501 293.22
51295 Swain's General Store Inc. 19037 Plugs, toilet brush 641 3101 10.92
Detergent 641 3101 8.97
Flares, hardware 641 3101 12.~
Motor oil, shoes 643 2080 72.98
Sandpaper, masking tape, brush 684 3120 2.50
Paint, accessories 6843120 10.47
Bulbs 641 3101 9.21
Clear poly film 641 3101 21.z~4
Uniform allowance-K Denton (>41 2080 51.~
51302 United Parcel Service 21005 Shipping services-May 643 3101 16.12
51305 Viking Sew & Vac 22047 Service vacuum cleaner, parts 648 3120 ~.19
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 March Scan charges 611 4210 34.50
March Scan charges 643 4210 10.75
March Scan charges 641 4210 1.52
April Scan charges 611 4210 27.79
April Scan charges 643 4210 7.03
April Scan charges 6~+1 4210 2.94
MS Select License Activity-Mar 641 6410 105.28
51326 Advanced Travel 01090 B Becket to Portland 4-21-99 6/+5 4310 207.96
51369 North Peninsula Bldg. Assoc. 14010 Fire Sprinkler Advertisement 642 3101
51377 Pierce County 16410 Registration-Mason, Reid 641 4310 1,050.00
51380 Positive Promotions 16262 Fire Dept promotional supplies 642 3101 125.6~
51395 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware 19035 Rekoil hose 6/+1 3101
Credit worm drive saw, case 641 3101 370.04-
Worm drive saw, case 641 3101 370.04
514~)0 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 611 4210 114.49
5-14 Billing 642 4210 22.90
37
~/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - ~K LIVE June 10 I~ Page 8
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 03/08/I~9 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
5-14 Billing 643 4210 22.90
5-14 Billing 641 4210 68.70
51427 ClaLLam County EMS/Trauma Care 03068 Medic I Advisory for June 643 4150 500.00
51439 Fire Instructor Testing 06224 Fire Dept testing software 645 3101 494.&0
51455 Larry's Janitor Service 12040 Cleaning services,towels,trash 684 4150 395.00
Cleaning services,towels,trash ~ 3101 85.30
51461 McPherson Supply Company 13111 Honda generator, light bar 641 6410 4,126.79
51479 Rocket 040/+3 Labor, add dry sidewall heads 684 ~10 822.20
Total for Fire 17,269.(X)
0(0)7 51071 Advanced Travel 01090 Kenworthy to Shelton 4-15-99 711 4310 13.00
Sperr to Ocean Shores 4-26 711 4310 327.60
Kenworthy to Ocean Shores 4-26 711 4310 338.60
51087 Complete Line, The 03~7 Highliters, refills 711 3101 19.04
Monitor riser 711 3101 42.94
51092 Data Acquisition Inc. 04038 Repsirs/maint-Deta collectors 711 4810 383.05
51103 Federal Firesafety Inc. 06023 Labor, install attenuator 784 4810 107.90
51139 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement 711 4210 11.75
Petty cash reimbursement 711 4990 8.00
51155 US West Communications 21001 4-2 Billing 784 4150 32 ~
51158 Viking Office Products 22054 Fastener folders 711 3101 4
Clip holder, scissors 711 3101 15.~1
Photo pages 711 3101 34.40
Folders, spirals, pens 711 3101 38.T5
Card box, scissors, clips 711 3101 44.16
51175 4 Seasons Engineering Inc. 06141 Bluff inspection-Hill Street 711 4150 800.00
51183 Angeles Concrete Products 01070 Concrete mix 711 3101 75.53
51197 CED/Consolidated Elec. Oist. Inc 03267 Lamps 784 3101 97.82
51198 Camera Corner 03044 Print processing 711 3101 7.81
Film processing 711 3101 24.56
Film processing 711 3101 46.~
Photos 711 3101 13.99
Film processing 711 3101 13.05
Processing, prints 711 3101 6.84
Photo processing 711 3101 7.15
51204 Cornell Auto Parts 03092 Armorall, car wash, mitt 784 3101 19.66
51237 NWPPA 14013 Registration Electric Industry 711 4310 50.00
51251 Olympic Paper Company 15111 Vacuum cleaner 784 3101 701.35
Liquid bleach 784 3101 8.42
Chrome plated tissue spindle 784 3101 5.4{)
51252 Olympic Printers Inc. 15027 Mailing labels 711 3101 90.98
51254 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030 Rulers 711 3101 32.03
Envelopes, paper 711 3101 30.15
Envelopes 784 3101 8.69
Reinforcing strips 711 3101 8.89
51258 Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 16004 Service leserjet printer 711 4810 40 ~-'
CD Rom recordeble media 711 3101 c
Toner, recordable CD-Rom 711 3101 386.28
Core charge 711 3101 22.~
51265 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement 711 3501 .96
38
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - YZK LIVE June 10 1999 Page 9
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
51281 Safeway Inc. 19045 Coffee, film, cookies 711 3101 22.84
51287 Snug Harbor Inc 19491 Tool for Litter pick-up 711 3501 53.41
51295 Swain's General Store Inc. 19037 Hand tools 711 3501 56.43
Thermometers 784 3101 15.84
Hand tools 711 3501 43.82
Oil, automotive, carpet tape 711 3101 20.32
51298 Thurman Supply 20005 Fluorescent tube 784 3101 32.11
Tube, fluorescent tube 784 3101 40.38
Credit Light bulbs 7843101 10.7B-
51300 US West Communications 21001 5-2 Billing 784 4150 32.65
51301 US West Direct 21024 Seattle directory 711 3101 34.59
51302 United Parcel Service 21005 Shipping services-May 711 4210
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 March Scan charges 711 4210 15.61
March Scan charges 711 4210
March Scan charges 711 4210 68.67
April Scan charges 711 4210 19.29
April Scan charges 711 4210 3.03
April Scan charges 711 4210 84.34
MS Select License Activity-Apr 711 3101 177.22
51316 Xerox Corporation 24001 DC265 Copier lease agra-March 711 4530 1,757.~
DC214S Lease agra-March 711 3101 70.94
51317 Zenovic & Associates 26216 Engineering Svcs-JC Penney 711 4150 292.50
J C Penny plan review 711 4150 747.50
51326 Advanced Travel 01090 Hale, McCurdy to Olympia 5-3 711 4310 795.03
J Pittis to Ocean Shores 4-30 711 4310 107.44
51338 Betzv~J Lighting 02239 Quad tube lamp 784 3101 303.20
51352 E.S.R.I. Inc. 051~ R~'~3istration-B Hale 711 4310 1,750.~X)
Ragistration-B McCurdy 711 4310 1,750.00
51379 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement 711 3501 29.11
51400 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 711 4210 68.70
5-14 Billing 711 4210 45.B0
5-14 Billing 711 4210 526.64
51432 Data Acquisition Inc. 04038 Test and upgrade data collecto 711 4810 ?5.00
51497 Xerox Corporation 240(}1 DC214S Lease agre-April 711 3101 249.50
Total for Public Works 13,2~.56
0008 51068 AT&T Wireless Services 01404 5-1 Billing B65 4210 100.87
5-1 Billing 865 4210 92.29
5107~ Angeles Temporary Services 01076 C Kochanek pe 4-30-99 866 4150 786.16
51074 Automated Business Sys. Inc. 01050 Ericsson cases 865 3120 34.51
51097 Direct Safety Company 04279 Safety glasses 865 3120 82.17
51100 Dungeness Turf Farm Inc. 04060 Sod 865 3140 107.90
51113 Kaman Industrial Technologies 11082 Radial ball bearing 865 3120 97.80
Radial ball bearing 865 3120 31.32
51118 Lindstrom, Bonnie 12307 Reimburse for aerobics music 862 3101 23.85
AEA Water Aerobic Certificatio862 4310 160.00
51120 McConkey Co., JMC 13109 Flower pots 865 3101 321.95
51140 Puget Sound Specialties Inc. 16039 Fertilizer, smfeline chalk 865 3140 4,241.78
SafeLine chalk, grass seed 865 3140 6,265.43
51152 Steuber Distributing Inc 19033 Fertilizer, osmocote, nozzles 865 3101 847.23
39
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 10
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
51169 Westfield, Patricia K. 23458 Buy back Cemetery lot 82858 866 9430 190.00
51176 Ace Equipment Company 01055 Gas cap, files 865 3120 21.04
51180 ALL Phase Electric Supply Co. 01061 Fluorescent Lamp 861 3101 92.97
Wire, box, plate 865 3101 31.58
51186 Angeles Millwork 01073 Hardware 865 3120 2.14
Lumber, screws, angles &65 3120 105.34
Hooks, fasteners 865 3120 8.98
Hooks 865 3120 2.42
Lumber, hardware, ties, caps 865 3101 87.~
Lumber 865 3120 45.27
Rope coil 865 3120 2.45
Hex lags, EMT strap, gloves 865 3120 5.17
PVC cap, measuring tape 865 3140 22.50
Lag screw, hex cap, washers 865 3120 4.52
Pipe straps, coupling, nipple 865 3101 20.54
Hardware, pipe straps 865 3101 17.15
Credit Pipe straps, hardware 865 3101 17.27-
Joist hanger, lumber,batteries 865 3120 287.7?
Box 865 3120 3.43
Saw blade, box, screws 865 3120 12~62
Lumber, box, screws 865 3120 20J~5
Windor kit, screws, lumber 865 3120 5E
Lumber, bit holder 865 3101 27.u~
Palm glove 866 3120 5.37
Lumber, nails, anchor wedge 865 3120 87.01
Lumber 865 3120 28.68
Screws, hex nuts 865 3120 3.50
Pipe straps, angles 865 3101 3.96
Mag nutsetter 865 3101 2.76
Blade 865 3120 9.70
BLade scraper 865 3120 5.11
Screw, insert bit 865 3120 11.25
Jack hemmer rental 865 4810 32.37
Contractor grade tape 865 3120 6.32
Pavement breaker 865 4810 32.37
Shovels 865 31~0 66.60
Surveyor tape 865 3120 4.60
Gypsum wallboard, concrete mix 865 3120 39.87
Pipe straps, snap clip 865 3120 16.08
Hardware 865 3101 6.~
Chalk box 865 3120 8.19
Power chalk 865 3120 1.01
Bolt cutter 865 3120 21.42
PVC elbows/ PVC bushings 865 3140 4.32
Galvanized nipple, elbow 866 3120 11.86
Lag screw hook 865 3120 2.17
S hook, hardware 865 3101 29 '~
Mag light, battery 865 3120 2.
Slip hook, hex nuts, screws 865 3101 54.93
Hex nuts, screws 865 3101 22.66
Twine 865 3120 15.36
40
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port AngeLes - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 11
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To06/10/1999
Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Hame Number Number
Fir timbers 865 3120 10.43
Screws 865 3120 9.55
51187 Angeles Plumbing Inc. 01039 Labor, clean kitchen drains 863 3120 98.46
51188 Angeles Temporary Services 01076 C Kochanek pe 5-15-99 866 4150
51193 Best Locking Systems 01079 Tubular Locks, cores 865 3120 168.44
51194 Blake Sand & Gravel Inc. 02045 Rebar 865 3120 2.81
Joint tape,grout,polyset,tile 865 3120 313.34
Top soil, cement 865 3101 74.86
Tile spacers,wedges,pallet/til 865 3120 267.30
Poly set, tile 865 3120 254.62
51198 Camera Corner 03044 Film, processing, photos 865 3101 37.97
51208 Denver's Tire Co. Inc. 04044 Nower flat repair, tubes 865 4810 11.87
51210 Dobson's 04054 Coupler 865 3120 23.32
Cap screw, trailer ball,washer 865 3120 22.90
Spark plug, coupler, hose assy 866 3120 18.90
51212 Eclipse C Corp. 19019 Washed sand 865 3140 275.14
Washed sand 865 3140 275.14
Washed sand 865 3140 183.43
51216 Federal Express Corp. 06022 Shipping services-April 811 3101 17.45
51223 Hartnagel Building Supply Inc. 08052 Rc~fing nails, blade ~55 3120 79.45
51232 Lincoln Industrial Corp. 12047 Supplies for boat ramp 865 3120 167.31
Sheet metal, cutting servives 865 3120 83.41
51241 Northwest Fence Co. 14071 Fencing materials 865 6510 6,943.37
Fencing materials 865 6510 2,012.15
51248 Olympic Drywall Supplies Inc. 15023 Drywall mud compound 865 3120 15.18
51251 Olympic Paper Company 15111 Paper 862 3101 168.00
Laundry detergent 862 3101 4~.36
Liquid bacteria 863 3120 16.76
Carpet freshener 866 3120 59.44
51252 Olympic Printers Inc. 15027 Sales tax on invoice 6~15 811 3101 22.55
Sales tax on invoice ~21 811 ]101 2.56
Sales tax on invoice ~1 861 3101 3.85
Sales tax on invoice 68821 863 3101 1.28
Sales tax on invoice 68821 866 3101 3.85
Sales tax on invoice ~1 ~2 3101 2.56
$1254 Olympic Stationers Inc. IS030 Paper 862 3101 32.36
Clipboards, folders 866 3101 25.90
NO Smoking sign,sheet protecto 8~ 3101 11.02
Push pins, glue, magnet, paper ~6 3101 17.81
Push pins, glue, magnet, paper 861 3101 4.56
51259 Parker Paint Mfg Co. Inc. 16201 Paint, roller frame 865 3120 171.30
51265 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement 862 3101 8.62
51295 Swain's General Store Inc. 19037 Wall plate, wire, switch box 865 3120 49.61
Seals 866 3120 5.33
Planter 862 3101 6.98
Hardware, gloves ~5 3101 3.47
Hex key 865 3501 8.89
Hose 865 3101 16.91
Spraypaint, hardware 865 3101 24.04
Sprayer 862 3120 36.65
Hose nozzle/ twist nozzle 862 3t20 31.37
41
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LZVE June 10 1999 Page 12
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/~/1999 To (~5/I0/1909
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Aaz)unt
Number Name Number Number
Furnace filter 863 3120 16.31
Funnel 861 3120 1.37
RechargeabLe battery 865 3140 11.?'~
Hand tools, garden hose 865 3101 72.01
Base anchors 865 3120 116.53
Hook 865 3120 .79
Pliers 865 3501 9.21
PLant care supplies 865 3101 26.80
Plastic plug 863 3120 3.74
Building supplies 861 3120 4.18
Spray nozzles 862 3120 10.65
Plumbing, pipe strap, nipple 865 3120 33.82
Work gloves 866 3120
Sponge,shovels, rakes,pruner 865 3501 194.13
Cleaning supplies,measuring cu 865 3120 18.58
Velcro material 861 3101 56.50
Twist nozzle 862 3120 10.78
Whistle with Lanyard 862 3101 12.75
Caster plate 865 3120 45.12
51297 Thompson, Cathy 20243 Reimburse pool rental deposit 862 9452 25.00
51298 Thurman Supply 20005 Duplex cover, razor blades 865 3120 8~
PVC pipe, sprinkler, cap, plug 865 3140 3
PVC adapter, PVC cement, elbow 865 3140
Valve box 865 3140 7.~
Copper, ground rod, wire, cap 865 3120 134.22
Fittings, wire channel, elbows 865 3120 ~.31
Halogen bulb, wall plate 865 3120 26.93
51300 US West Communications 21001 5-2 Billing 863 4210 47.34
51303 United Rentals Inc (ProRental) 16034 StUlq~ grinder rental 865 4810 118.69
Stump grinder rental 865 ~10 151.~
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 March Scan charges 811 4210 ?.55
March Scan charges 866 42,210 8.53
March Scan charges 865 4210 3.7-/'
March Scan charges 861 4210 26.45
March Scan charges 862 4210 4.98
March Scan charges 863 4210 9.01
April Scan charges 811 4210 8.83
April Scan charges 866 4210 11.28
April Scan charges 865 4210 .83
April Scan charges 861 4210 18.22
April Scan charges 862 4210 2.69
April Scan charges 8453 4210 3.94
51312 Washington (Unemp), State of 23178 1st Qtr 19<)9 unemployment 862 20(30 854.00
1st Qtr 199<) unemployment 865 2060
51313 Washington Fire & Safety Equip 23004 Service suppression system 865 6510 76.61
51316 Xerox Corporation 24001 DC220SS Lease agre-March 863 3101 197.42
DC220SS Lease agre-March 861 3101 197
51326 Advanced Travel 01090 J Hicks to Blaine 4-27-99 861 4310 27L
51349 Crown Aquatics Inc. 03110 Pool paint,joint filler,thinne 862 3120 1,952.68
51351 Dungeness Turf Farm Inc. 04060 Sod, pallet deposits 865 3140 7T2.14
51358 Jackson's Signs 104318 Sign deposit-Lincoln Pk 865 6510 500.(X)
42
~/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1909 Page 13
CHECK REGISTER
Dmte From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
51359 Johnstone Supply Inc. 10026 Urinal, toilet, flush valve 865 3120 384.28
51361 Kochanek, Cindy Lou 11136 May Commissions 866 4990 6(~5.15
51363 Marine Rescue Products Inc 13419 Spineboard, immobilizer,straps 862 3120 371.99
Spineboard, immobilizer,straps 862 3101 108.~
51365 May, Andrew T. 13425 April contract pmt-Beautificat 865 3101 1,618.50
51366 Naybee's Deli 13036 Park Board Meeting Lunch 811 3101 49.~
51383 Quiring Monuments Inc. 17001 Inscription-Albright 866 3401 55.00
Grass Marker- Hynes 866 3401 228.00
Marker,foundation,vase-NcWilli ~ 3401 263.(30
Inscription-Pollard ~ 3401 55.(30
Granite Foundation-Janet Myren 866 3401 81.00
5138/+ Recycled Earth Products 18265 Sandy loam 865 3140 6/+7.40
51389 Sears Commercial Credit Centrl 19109 Socket set 865 3501 43.14
Tool box 865 3501 67.91
51395 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware 19~)35 Cylinder rent-oxygen 865 3101 16.19
Cylinder rent-oxygen ~ 3101 10.79
Irrigation fitting 865 3120 3.33
Cap 865 3140 1.06
Nipple 865 3140 13.49
Ball joint, ball bearing, Link 865 3120 72.68
Cut off blades 865 3120 40.11
Bolt 865 3120 14.39
Hex cap, pipe ~55 3120 14.07
Drill 865 3501 224.42
Cable tie 865 3120 14.21
Elbow,nipple,connector/sponge 865 3120 58.27
Hex nuts, hardware 865 3101 5.74
Oxygen 866 3101 17.16
Teflon tape, 0 ring 865 3140 1.00
Pipe wrench, crimping tool 865 3140 49.18
Hinge handle 865 3120 37.56
Hardware 865 3101 1.29
Marker paint 865 3120 4.63
Trowel 865 3140 4.52
Bushing, plug 865 3140 4.27
Chute 865 3120 77.75
51400 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 862 4210 41.01
5-14 Billing 811 4210 68.70
5-14 Billing 866 4210 22.90
5-14 Billing 865 4210 22.90
5-14 Billing 861 4210 45.80
5-14 Billing 862 4210 22.90
5-14 Billing 863 4210 68.70
5-14 Billing 865 4210 38.31
5-14 Billing 862 4210 34.69
4-20 Billing 863 4210 47.81
4-20 Billing 863 4210 47.81
51438 Familian NW (~5020 Machine bolt, hex nut, nipple 865 3120 16.~
Urinals 865 3120 547.38
Galvanized hex bushing 865 3120 19.69
Credit Machine bolt, hex nut 865 3120 16.~-
43
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 14
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
51459 M & P Garage Doors 13100 Repair door, Labor and parts 865 4810 230.91
51464 Mity-Lite Inc. 13443 Stack chair, chair dolly 861 6410 13,645.04
51482 Skegit Gardens Inc 19077 Flowers for beautification 865 3101 2,801.20
Flowers for beautification 865 3101 1,663.27
51488 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 863 4210 41.89
5-20 Billing 863 4210 47.81
5-20 Billing 863 4210 47.81
Total for Parks & Recreation 62,~43.28
Total for General Fund 252,170.68
101 0{301 51078 Black Graphic Design, Laurel 02044 Printing-PA Visitor Guide 122 4150 12,547.81
51131 North Olympic Peninsula 14127 April contract services 115 5083 3,417.00
51200 Certified Folder Display 034~ June services for NOPVCB 122 4150 261.25
51233 Logan & Associates, Jeff 12061 Website Svcs for PA Chamber 122 4150 1,800.00
51240 North Olympic Peninsula 14127 Reimburse expenses-lst half 115 5083 5,000.00
51314 Wendt Advertising 23426 April Services for NOPVCB 122 4150 28,281.77
March Services for NOPVCB 122 4150 53,870.50
51419 Brewer, David 02055 Contract Services for June 115 49~20 100.00
Total for Convention Center Fund 105,27
102 51239 Newman Traffic Signs 14163 Raw Aluminum Sign Blanks 102 2370(0)0 23.35-
Anti-theft nuts 102 237~ 22.12-
51353 Flint Trading Inc. ~156 Street signs, white line 102 237(X)00
Total for Department 932.13-
D(O~7 51068 AT&T Wireless Services 01404 5-1 Billing 752 4210 256.32
5-1 Billing 752 4210 13.14
51070 Advanced Traffic Products Inc. 01224 Opticom detector 752 3125 427.79
51158 Viking Office Products 22054 Card box, scissors, clips 752 3101 18.58
51182 Angeles Communications Inc 01069 Service call-Ext ~20 752 4210 72.~
51183 Angeles Concrete Products 01070 Ecology blocks 752 3125 107.90
Ecology blocks 752 3101 107.90
51186 Angeles Millwork 01073 Lumber 752 3101 36.62
Belt, nails, suspenders 752 3101 66.53
51193 Best Locking Systems 01079 Tubular locks,cylindrical lock 752 3101 238.04
51194 Blake Sand & Gravel Inc. 02045 Credit pallet returned 752 3125 15.00-
Catch basin, frame, grates 752 3101 912.83
Concrete, pallet 752 3125 137.36
51230 Lakeside Industries Inc. 12036 Asphalt 752 3101 801.05
Asphalt 752 3101 163.20
Asphalt, liquid asphalt 752 3101 175.04
Asphalt, liquid asphalt 752 3101 1,331.02
51239 Newman Traffic Signs 14163 Raw Aluminum Sign Blanks 752 3125
Anti-theft nuts 752 3125 30[
51251 Olympic Paper Company 15111 Quick sorb absorbent 752 3101 593.45
Truck & fountain brush, handle 752 3101 41.56
51295 Swain's General Store Inc. 19037 Sprayer 752 3125 10.76
44
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 15
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
Rollers, razor blade, frames 752 3125 25.14
Lawn,garden supplies, roundup 752 3101 36.29
51308 Nashington (DIS), State of 23111 April Scan charges 752 4210 .37
51329 Alpine Products Inc. 01177 RPM signs 752 3125 2,894.19
Rumble strips 752 3125 120.97
51353 Flint Trading Inc. 06156 Street signs, white Line 752 3125 12,110.18
51379 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement 752 4150 13.00
51400 US Nest Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 752 4210 68.70
51475 Pharos Corporation 16319 Prof Svcs-Airport Extension 752 4150 1,537.00
Prof Svcs-Airport Extension 752 4150 1,417.50
Total for Public Norks 24,341.23
Total for Street Fund 23,409.10
103 0001 51252 OLympic Printers Inc. 15027 Business cards-T Smith 123 3101 83.24
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 March Scan charges 123 4210 13.91
April Scan charges 123 4210 11.16
51326 Advanced Travel 01090 T Smith to Nenatchee 5-4-99 123 4310 247.~6
T Smith to Builders Assoc Mtg 123 4310 19.00
Total for Economic Development 374.77
107 0005 51071 Advanced Travel 01090 Wu to OLympia 4-11-99 532 4310 339.50
51076 Best Power Technology 02153 Sales tax on Service PLan 532 4150 255.17
51141 Quill Corporation 17000 Ribbon, video tapes, cassettes 532 3101 223.27
51191 BATM / Connectronix Corp. 02z~2 AS400 adapter card 532 3501 310.76
51238 New World Systems 14184 Support services- pe 5-1-99 532 6410 1,215.00
51244 O'Connor, Michael T. 15096 Reimburse uniform allowance 532 2080 74.31
51254 OLympic Stationers [nc. 15030 Paper 532 3101 64.72
51258 Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 16004 Printer memory 532 3101 76.61
Toner 532 3101 85.24
Epson printer 532 ~810 214.72
Printer ink 532 3101 58.27
Printer ink 532 3101 58.~?
Credit printer memory- 532 3101 76.61-
51308 ~ash~ngton (DIS), State of 23111 Hatch Scan charges 532 4210 ~9.59
April Scan charges 532 4210 35.81
51326 Advanced Travel 01090 N Wu to SemTac 5-4-99 532 4310 7.58
51400 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 532 4210 389.27
51426 Captain T's 03048 Shirt, embroidery 532 2080 153.76
Embroidery-Pen-Com 532 2080 19.42
51~2 Force 4 06060 4NH ODS Tapes 532 3101 ~85.08
51453 Keating BuckLin & McCormack 11032 Prof Svcs-R HcGahan 532 4150 6,323.88
51488 US gest Communications 21001 5-23 Billing 532 4210 47.81
' Total for PenCom 10,~11.~t
208 0002 51336 Bank of New York, The 02175 Maintenance fees-PORANGCLID90 292 4150 41.33
Total for L.I.O. Control Fund 41.33
45
~/~/1~11:07 City of Port AngeLes - Y2K LIVE June 10 1~ Page 16
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/~/19~ To ~/10/19~
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
209 O(X)2 Haintenance fees-PORANG92 297 4150 50.18
Total for 1992 GO Bonds ( Fire Station ) 50.18
210 0C~)2 Naintenace fees-PORANGG095 291 4150 42.23
Total for 1995 GO Bonds ( Library ) 42.23
310 0C~)7 51139 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03C~52 Petty cash reimbursement 792 4210 13.20
51163 Washington (DOT), State of 23325 Lauridsen/Edgewood Right of Wa 792 4150 252.26
51179 Alderson, Randall Boyd 01214 Purchase Right-of Way-Airport 792 6101 1,~X)0.00
51211 Earley, Sue 05189 Purchase Right-of Way-Airport 792 6101 6,750.00
51216 Federal Express Corp. 06022 Shipping services-April 792 4210 5.25
51263 Peninsula Daily News 16012 Bid advertisement-Race St & C 792 4410 209.0~
51270 R J Services Inc. 18108 Library Demolition-Pmt #2 Proj 796 4150 26,325.82
51315 Westrem, John & Evelyn M 23460 Purchase Right-of Way-Airport 792 6101 168,850.00
51319 Port of Port Angeles 16027 Purchase Right-of-Way-Airport 792 6101 104,0(03.00
51456 Lindberg Architects Inc. 12045 Prof Svcs-Carnegie Restoration 796 4150 750.00
51481 Seattle Daily Journal of Comm. 19058 Ad-Sidewalk construction 792 4410 475.20
Total for Public Works 308,630 ~?
0008 51249 Olympic Junior Babe Ruth 15179 Trusses for batting cage 895 3101 458.28
Install sheet rock-Vol Park 895 6510 529.31
51285 Seattle Daily Journal of Comm. 1~58 Ad-Volunteer Field Bleachers 895 6510 142.20
51372 OLympic Junior Babe Ruth 15179 Restroom mirror, vanity 895 3101 ~3.~
514~ OLympic Junior Babe Ruth 15179 Sheetrock for Storage bldg 895 3101 1,021.35
Total for Parks & Recreation 3,035.07
Total for Capital Improvement Fund 311,~5.~
316 OC)C~ 51194 Blake Sand & Gravel Inc. 02045 Top soil ~ 3120 429.~
51298 Thurman Supply 20005 Grease cap, pop-up sprinklers 860 3120 161.16
Total for Lincoln Park Iaq~rovement Fund 5g0.60
320 0006 5114~ Ryan Swanson & CLeveland 18205 Legal services-Fire Hall 621 4150 1,5~).00
51222 Hanna Construction ~74 Retainage-Fire Dept Glass Cano 621 4150 1,359.93
51407 Olympic Western Company 15107 Settlement-Fire Hall Lawsuit 621 4150 19,423.00
51409 Insurance Company of the West 09119 Settlement-Fire Hall Lawsuit 621 4150 19,423.00
Total for Fire Station Construction Fund 41,745.93
401 51069 AcctCorp International Inc. 01364 Remit rfd-Atlantic ALLied Cons 401 1222200 34.94
Remit rfd-O Bandy ~6533-021 401 12222CX) 74.88
51~1 Chamberlin, Linda 03476 Utility deposit rfd-042455038 401 2131100 87
51096 Oille, Jenean 04282 Utility deposit rfd-0539960(O 401 2131100 25L
51097 Direct Safety Company 04279 Safety glasses 401 2370CX)0 2.82-
51112 Insight Direct Inc. 09~5 Computer hard drive 401 2370(~0 10.43-
51121 McDonald, Ken 13451 Utility deposit rfd-11~18016 401 2131100 125.00
46
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 17
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
51125 MoseLey, Henry 13453 utility ovrpmt rfd-030350001 401 1222200 246.97
51126 Hurry, Cindy 13452 Utility deposit rfd-124601002 401 2131100 21.22
51139 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement 401 2451000 16.00
51141 Quill Corporation 17000 Harkers, ribbon, tab inserts 401 2370000 14.23-
Markers 401 2370000 7.17-
Harkers 401 2370(0)0 11.27
51161 WESCO Distribution Inc. 23150 Melton enclosure with juction 401 14140(0)
Melton enclosure with juction 401 14110(0) 42.67
51162 Walters, Michael 23459 Utility deposit rfd-O02984D08 401 2131100 1~5.77
51231 Leinaar, Thomas 12308 Utility deposit rfd-019003015 401 2131100 125.00
51255 Orsborn, Becky L 15140 Utility deposit rfd-114812018 401 2131100 33.82
51368 Napiontek, Jack 14466 Utility deposit rfd-114626013 401 21311D0 11.48
51379 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03~2 Tank rebate-S Hoffman 401 1343300 25.00
51405 Wilson, David 23461 Utility deposit rfd-033413029 401 21311(X~ 31.91
51406 Young, Cody 25125 Utility deposit rfd-~927010 401 2131100 35.78
514~5 6rimes, Janelle 07285 Utility deposit rfd-12423/~04 401 2131100}0 58.13
51450 Jansen, Jon 10172 Utility deposit rfd-013587020 401 2131100 167.08
51496 Western States Electric Inc. 23025 Transformer connector 401 14110(0) 787.23
Total for Department
0009 51068 AT&T Wireless Services 01404 4-I Billing 911 4210 8.84
5-1 Billing 911 4210 243.14
51071 Advanced Travel 01090 Harper to Portland 4-21-99 911 4310 140.98
Beckett to Seattle 4-29-99 911 4310 12.50
Becket, Shay to Seattle 5-7-~ 911 4310 12.35
51097 Direct Safety Company 04279 Safety glasses 911 3101 38.52
51112 Insight Direct Inc. 09~)85 Computer hard drive 911 6310 1~.43
51139 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03~2 Petty cash reimbursement 911 49~0
51141 Quill Corporation 17000 Markers, ribbon, tab inserts 911 3101 194.33
Markers 911 3101 97.89
Cr~it pens 911 3101 14.58-
Markers 911 3101 153.~-
51149 Shamp, Mark 19256 Reimburse-Relight supplies put 911 3402 1,315.30
51151 Sound Analytical Services Inc. 19~)25 Test oil smatples for PCB conte 911 4150 18.75
Test oil samples for PCB conte 911 4150 537.50
Oil sample testing for PCS's 911 4150 550.00
51155 US West Communications 21001 5-2 Billing 911 4210 ~.~
51164 Washington (DRS), State of 23141 Statewide pensioners April 911 2010 200.16
51168 Western States Electric Inc. 23025 Switches 911 3402 4,833.92
51180 ALL Phase Electric Supply Co. 01061 Service charge 911 3101 8.20
Electrical box 911 3402 .56
Conduit, wire 911 3402 71.~
Offset nipple 911 3402 26.28
Box, cover, timer 911 3402 21.34
Pole 911 4~10 12.12
Light fixtures 911 3402 142.43
Receiver, electrical box 911 3402 346.54
Wire 911 3402
Wire 911 3402 113.15
EMT strap 911 3402 15.~
47
99/0~/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 18
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
Wire 911 3402 36.28
PVC conduit 911 3402 28.61
ENT strap/ self drill 911 3402 36.40
BLank cover, connector 911 3402 34.15
Duplex receptacle 911 3402 94.46
Hole plug 911 4810 21.58
Switch/receptacle covers 911 3402 202.77
PLastic seal, knock out seal 911 3402 9.70
Receptacle cover 911 3402 14.24
51186 Angeles MiLLwork 01075 High speed cutter 911 3501 5.75
White quiet switch 911 3402 3.24
51195 Breitbach's Sharpening Service 02247 Saw blades 911 4810 15.11
51198 Camera Corner 03044 Photos 911 3101 12.43
51204 Cornell Auto Parts 03092 Cleaner 911 3101 7.54
51205 Credit Bureau of CLaLLam Co 03094 Public Records Bulletin 911 4150 17.26
51219 Gateway Companies Inc 07195 Computer, Win NT upgrade 911 6310 1,602.32
51227 Jim's Pharmacy (Inc) 10020 Syringes 911 4150 85.24
51229 L & L Tool Specialties 12035 Bit extension 911 3101 4.29
51251 OLympic Paper Company 15111 FLoor cleaner 911 3101 11.86
FLoor cleaner 911 3101 15.88
51252 Olympic Printers Inc. 15027 Business cards-Johnston,Shamp 911 3101 52./~
51254 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030 Banker boxes, paper 911 3101 2;
Pencil lead, pens, index tabs 911 3101 34.~5
51258 Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 16004 Service typewriter 911 3101 ~.56
Excel book 911 3101 21.57
51259 Parker Paint Mfg Co. Inc. 16201 Paint, paint tray, tape 911 4810 95.53
Paint, varnish brush 911 3101 2~.98
51263 Peninsula Daily News 16012 Ordinance summary-#3016 911 4410 23.40
51268 Public Utility Dist Clallam Co 16038 SR 101/Euclid Ave-5-13 billing 911 4710 15.87
51295 Swain's General Store Inc. 19037 Sander swivel, pad stripping 911 3101 16.49
Aluminum spraypaint 911 4810 3.53
Foam paintbrush 911 4810 2.72
Cleaning supplies 911 3101 2.52
Extension cord 911 3101 43.6D
Extension drill bit 911 3101 6.98
51298 Thur.mn Supply 20005 Wire stripper 911 3501 15.36
Weatherproof cover,eLbow, coupl 911 3101 17.58
513{)0 US West Communications 21001 5-5 Billing 911 4210 41.~
51302 United Parcel Service 21{)05 Shipping services-May 911 3101 7.46
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 March Scan charges 911 4210 24.50
April Scan charges 911 4210 19.33
MS Select License Activity-Apr 911 6310 480.75
51311 Washington (Ecology), State of 23197 1998 Hazardous Waste Education 911 4990 35.00
51316 Xerox Corporation 24001 DC220SS Lease agra- pe 3-30 911 4150 451.64
51322 ABB Power T&D Company Inc 01321 Alpha meter repair 911 4810 100.00
51326 Advanced Travel 01090 J Harper to Carlisle PA 4-25 911 4310 ~5.01
S McLain to Portland 4-15-99 911 4310 150
51364 Marsh Mundorf Pratt & Sullivan 13287 April Legal Svcs-Rates 1999 911 4901 247
51378 Port Angeles City Light 16083 Petty cash reimbursement 911 4150 5.40
Petty cash reimbursement 911 4150 4.30
Petty cash reimbursement 911 3101 5.40
48
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y~K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 19
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
Petty cash reimbursement 911 4150 4.30
Petty cash reimbursement 911 4810 21.58
51379 Port Angeles City Treasurer 0]062 Petty cash reimbursement 911 4150 37.94
51381 Public Utility Dist CLaLLam Co 16038 Lauridsen BLvd & L St-May 911 4710 20.46
51395 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware 19035 ELectrical supplies 911 ]402 2].]8
Saw blade, marker paint, rule 911 ]501 84.12
Credit wood rule 911 ]501 17.04-
Gloves 911 3501 25.85
Strip Loads for HiLti gun 911 ]101 26.72
Bolt, nuts 911 ]402 5.44
51400 US ~est Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 911 4210 ]20.58
5-14 Billing 911 4210 40.96
51401 Utilities Underground Loc Ctr 21010 April Locates 911 4150 ]1.27
51431 CLiniCare of PA Inc. 0]080 PhysicaLs-Raemer,HoLbrook,~aLd 911 4310 72.00
51434 EES Consulting Inc. 05140 Prof Svcs pe 4-lo-Rate Case 911 4901 658.20
51436 Equifax - Credit Information 05160 Credit inquiries pe 5-19 911 4150 31.32
51448 Hopkins, Dick 08]4] Rfd ovrpmt underground power e 911 9907 5,201.92
51469 N~PPA 1401] Education Sustaining Member Du 911 4901 1,925.00
5148] Sound Analytical Services Inc. 19025 Test oil samples for PCB conte 911 4150 ]75.00
51496 ~estern States ELectric Inc. 2]025 Limiter/ fuse tube 911 ]501 5]5.07
~ Rubberized connector 911 ]402 522.12
Total for Light 2]/943.98
Total for Light Fund 26,790.42
402 51156 USA BLueBook 21060 FLex hose fitting 402 2]70000 12.43-
S124] Nurnberg Scientific 14092 PH buffer solution 402 2]70000 4.22-
51]]7 Barco 02]46 Valve, reduced pressure valve 402 2]70000 42.]9-
51341 CSUS Foundation Inc. 0]277 ~ater Treatment Operation Nanu 402 2]70000 2.61-
5140] ~ashington (GA)/ State of 2]]46 Emergency food-disaster prepar 402 2]70000 ]].90-
Total for Department 95.55-
000] S1068 AT&T ~ireLess Services 01404 5-1 Billing ]54 4~10 ]7.04
S1072 AmTest Inc. 01034 Sample testing-Silver ]54 4150 17.00
51109 Graphic Controls Corporation 07016 Chart pens, chart paper ]54 3101
Chart pens, chart paper ]54 ]10t 109.55
5112] AT&T Messaging now ~etrocaLL 20000 4-24 Billing ]54 4210 46.86
51124 Norrison Construction 1301] Excavating svcs-Hwy 101 ]54 ]101 857.81
51130 North American Crane & Equip 14196 Repair tractor motor, camera ]54 ]101 768.94
51139 Port Angeles City Treasurer 0]062 Petty cash reimbursement ]54 ]101 14.00
51155 US ~est Communications 21001 5-2 Billing ]54 4210 ]9.60
5-2 Billing ]54 4210 41.28
4-20 Billing ]544210 28.11
51156 USA BLueBook 21060 FLex hose fitting ]54 ]101 169.75
.... 51170 ghitney Equipment Co. Inc. 2]07~ Generator ]54 ]101 1]S.75
51176 Ace Equipment Company 01055 Drive cable kit ]54 ]101 28.27
Sharpen blades ]54 ]101 10.79
51186 Angeles ~iLlwork 0107~ ~eed/grass killer ]54 ]101 50.70
51196 Brown and CaLdweLL 02057 Prof Svcs-~ System Improvemen ]54 4150 4,264.6~
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port AngeLes - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 20
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
51203 CLiniCare of PA Inc. 03080 Physical-Beverford,DiveLbiss 354 4310 82.00
51204 CorneLL Auto Parts 03092 Socket, wrench 354 3101 34.93
Respirator 354 3101 56.66
51210 Dobson's 04054 Electronic cleaner 354 3101 9.62
51217 Ferrellgas (Irc) 06024 Propane 354 4710 46.88
Propane 354 3101 21.82
Propane 354 3101 2.05
51223 Hartnagel Building Supply Inc. 08052 Drill 354 3501 24.27
51243 Nurnberg Scientific 14092 PM buffer solution 354 3101 57.57
51252 Olympic Printers Inc. 15027 Time cards-Wastewater 354 3101 87.78
51254 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030 Paper 354 3101 64.72
51258 Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 16004 Service copier 354 4150 4?5.84
Sheet protectors 354 3101 22.36
Table, bookcase 354 3101 159.69
Surge protector 354 3101 24.71
51295 Swain's General Store Inc. lg~)37 Batteries 354 3101 117.15
51298 Thurman Supply 20(0)5 Plants, garden tools 354 3101 30.50
Razor blades, weed killer 354 3101 171.32
Poly seam seal, sprinklers 354 3101 12.80
PVC cement,ball valve,coupling 354 3101 15.74
51302 United Parcel Service 21005 Shipping services-May 354 4210
Shipping services-May 354 4210 4
Shipping services-May 354 4210 49..w
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 March Scan charges 354 4210 16.38
April Scan charges 354 4210 16.25
MS Select License Activity-Mar 354 3101 247.97
51330 AmTest Inc. 01034 Sample testing-April 354 4150 956.25
Sample testing-April 354 4150 816.D0
Sample testing-Silver 354 4150 17.00
51336 Bank of New York, The 02175 Administrative fee-PORANGWAT98 354 4150 100.00
Administrative fee-PORANGWAT94 354 4150 42.23
51347 Cole Industrial Inc. 03300 Service boiler, parts & Labor 354 4150 1,429.78
51370 Northwest Biosolids Mgmt Assr 14152 Annual membership 354 4901 200.00
51371 Olympic Chemical Corporation 15117 Sodium Bisulfite solution 354 3101 1,189.23
51395 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware 19035 O-ring, hammer 354 3101 7.93
Drywall, hex cap 354 3101 11.45
~all valve 354 3101 33.22
51400 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 354 4210 45.80
51401 Utilities Underground Loc Ctr 21010 April locates 354 4150 15.63
51431 CliniCare of PA Inc. 03~0 Physicals-Raemer,Holbrook,Wald 354 4310 72.00
Physicals-Raemer/Holbrook/Wald 354 4310
51460 Marsh-McBirney Inc. 13104 Meter upgrade 354 4150 2,286.21
Meter upgrade 354 4150 2,286.21
51~ Sears Cor~mercial Credit Centrl 19109 Tool set,screwdriver set,plier 354 3501 210.37
514~ US West Communications 21001 5-23 Billing 354 4210 47.81
5-23 Billing 354 4210 28.11
5-23 Billing 354 4210 47
5-23 Billing 354 4210
5-23 Billing 354 4210 47.81
5-23 Billing 354 4210 47.81
5-23 Billing 3544210 47.81
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 21
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/03/I~ To 06/10/1999
Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
5-23 Billing 354 4210 28.11
Total for Atty Wastewater 18,785.84
0007 51C)6~3 AT&T Wireless Services 01404 5-1 Billing 753 4210 47.21
51094 Dept of Community Development 030~5 Water testing-April 753 4150 456.C)0
51138 Platt Electric Supply Inc 16185 Timing relay 753 3101 207.94
51146 Sanderson Safety Supply Co. 19048 Fire boots 793 3111 128.25
51154 Transfac Funding Corporation 20059 Shipping services 753 4210 167.76
51176 Ace Equipment Company 01055 Rope, handle, labor 753 3101 12.14
51186 Angeles Millwork 01075 Lunfl3er 753 3101 12.81
51189 Anjo Soils 01057 Top soil 753 3101 ~.79
Top soil 753 3101 312.91
51192 Baxter Farms 02035 Grass seed 753 3101 ~.34
51203 CliniCare of PA Inc. 03080 Physical-Beverford,Divelbiss 753 4310 72.00
51216 Federal Express Corp. 06022 Shipping services-April 794 4210 5.55
51230 Lakeside Industries Inc. 12036 Asphalt 753 3101 126.32
Asphalt 753 3101 87.34
Asphalt 753 3101 87.34
Asphalt 753 3101 502.84
Asphalt, liquid asphalt 753 3101 1~.45
51232 Lincoln Industrial Corp. 120/+7 Ball mount/ ball 753 3101 28.76
51250 Olympic Laundry & Clnrs Inc. 15026 Cleaning services 753 3101 27.51
51251 Olympic Paper Company 15111 Coffee decanter 753 3101 26.94
Liquid chlorine 753 3101 338.81
Liquid chlorine 753 3101 338.81
51263 Peninsula Daily News 16012 Invitation to bid-Water materi 753 4410 140.40
Notice-Proposal on proj 898-11 753 4/+10 ~.80
51268 Public Utility Dist Clallam Co 16038 203 Reservoir Rd-5-11 billing 753 4710 93.30
51276 Richmond 2-Way Radio 18009 Labor, turn knob 753 3101 89.45
51280 S & B Inc. 19040 Field service-Tigermag meter 753 4150 705.90
51295 Swain's General Store Inc. 19(337 ClP, hose connector 753 3101 20.67
Plumbing, galvanized nipple 753 3101 4.80
Propane cylinder 753 3101 5.76
Lawn, garden 753 3101 5.33
51298 Thurman Supply 20(X)5 Breaker valve 753 3101 78.61
Galvanized pipe, plug 753 3101 33.23
Adapter, bushing 753 3101 2.03
PVC pipe, coupling 753 3101 3.57
Bushing 753 3101 .51
51302 United Parcel Service 21005 Shipping services-Hay 753 4210 7.65
51303 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 March Scan charges 753 4210 9.13
April Scan charges 753 4210 12.32
MS Select License Activity-Mar 753 3101 99.55
51312 Washington (Unemp), State of 23178 Ist Qtr 199<) unemployment 753 2060 3,042.00
51327 Aldergrove Construction Inc. 01286 Hydro-seed 14th St slide area 753 4150 107.90
51336 Bank of New York, The 02175 Maintenance fees-PORAANGWAT94R 753 4150 41.78
51337 Bavco 02346 Valve/ reduced pressure valve 753 3101 578.89
51339 Bushwacker, The 02129 Refreshments-PW Director Candi 753 3101 561.70
Refreshments-PW Director Candi 753 3101 22.17
51340 CH2M Hill 03005 Engineering Svcs-Water Supply 753 4150 2,153.64
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
51341 CSUS Foundation Inc. 0327? Water Treatment Operation Manu 753 4310 35.61
51350 Doty, Kristen M 04284 Framed Resolution-Jack Pittis 753 4410 64.74
51354 GRCC/WW 07026 Exam fee-Bill Beverford 753 4310 255.00
51381 Public Utility Dist Clallam Co 16038 Crown Z Water Rd-May 753 4710 14.31
51392 Sparling Instruments Co. Inc. 19083 Repair meter 753 3101 339.98
Rebuild/calibrate transmitter 753 3101 110.98
51395 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware 19035 Watering can, Miracle grow 753 3101 10.01
PSI gauge 753 3101 26.92
C02 753 3101 58.27
C02 753 3101 29.13
51398 US Filter/Pacific Water Works 210~r7 Fire hydrant shaft coupler 753 3101 230.91
51400 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 753 4210 22.90
51401 Utilities Underground Loc Ctr 21010 April locates 753 4150 15.(>4
51403 Washington (GA), State of 23346 Emergency f~x:~-disaster prepar 753 3101 462.90
51415 AWRA - Washington Section 01346 Registration-C Knut$on 753 4310 70.00
51421 CH2M Hill 03005 Engineering Svcs-Resevoir Proj 793 4150 747.58
514~ Foster Pepper & Sheffelman 0~3 Legal Svcs-Water Rights #3 753 4150 18~).06
51481 Seattle Daily Journal of Comm. 19058 Advertisement-Reservoir cover 793 4~r10 498.30
Advertisement-Sewer main 794 4~+10 498.30
5148~ US West Communications 21001 5-23 Billing 753 4210 59.20
5-23 Billing 753 4210 267..52
Total for Public Works 15,49~..~
Total for Wmter/Wmstewater Fund
404 51115 Keep America Beautiful Inc. 11181 Recycling color books z~)4 2370(0)0 20.85-
51226 Insight Direct Inc. 09085 Printer 404 2370000 21.26-
Printer 404 2370000 19.68-
Credit printer 40423700(0) 19.68
Total for Department 42.11-
0007 51115 Keep America Beautiful Inc. 11181 Recycling color books 755 3101 284.72
51157 USDA, APHIS, FSO, Acctg Svcs 21069 Prof Svcs to alleviate hazards 755 4150 6,989.65
51178 Airgms-Norpmc Inc. 01411 Cylinder rental 755 3101 11.~
51186 Angeles Hillwork 0107~J Lumber 755 3101 98.~r7
Paint, paint tray, brush 755 3101 32.96
51210 Dobson's 04054 AC hour meter 755 3101 156.80
51226 Insight Direct Inc. 09085 Printer 755 3101 290.26
Printer 755 3101 2~S.68
Credit printer 755 3101 268.68-
51228 KONP Radio 11019 April commercials-KONP 755 4410
April commercials-KIKN 755 /+410 I(X).O0
April commercials-KIKN 755 4~+10 17.30
April commercials-KONP 755 4410 37.50
51250 Olympic Laundry & Clnrs Inc. 15026 Cleaning services 755 4990 107~=
51252 Olympic Printers Inc. 15027 Time Cards-Solid Waste 755 3101 I(
51253 Olympic Refrigeration 15~5 Removed freon from 121 units 755 4150 1,5~.(1
51258 Pacific Office Equipment Inc. 160(0+ Cash drawer 755 3101 194.22
51259 Parker Paint Mfg Co. Inc. 16201 Paint, wire brush 755 3101 41.05
52
99/(~5/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - ~K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 23
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/0~/1999 To ~/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL C~e Amount
Number Name Number Number
51263 Peninsula Daily News 16012 Bid-SW Collection Truck 755 4410 115.36
51264 Pettit Oil Company 16302 Oil, haz mat fee 755 3101 223.50
51276 Richmond 2-Way Radio 18009 Install closed CKTU in truck 755 4810 242.7"7
51295 Swain's General Store Inc. 19037 Grease gun, hose, bird control 755 3101 64.~
Raingear 755 3101 39.64
513C~3 US West Communications 21CX:)1 5-5 Billing 755 4210 40.96
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 March Scan charges 755 4210 10.80
April Scan charges 755 4210 12.95
51317 Zenovic & Associates 26216 Engineering svcs-Rayonier Mill 755 4150
51]]1 Analytical Resources Inc. 01252 Groundwater/leachate testing 755 4150 4,]91.00
51335 Automotive Environmental Svcs 01041 Waste antifreeze pick up 755 3101 210.00
513~ Naybee's Deli 13036 PW Director Candidate lunch 755 3101 220.92
5137~ Olympic Refrigeration 15085 Removed compressors and freon 755 4150 971.10
51382 Pyrc~yne American (Corp) 16200 Bird control supplies 755 3101 353.47
51395 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware 19035 Fuel tank 755 3501 376.57
51400 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 755 4210 114.48
51420 Budget Rent-A-Car 02152 Car rental-PW Director Candida 755 4310 218.81
Car rental-PW Director Candida 755 4310 80.10
Car rental-PW Director Candida 755 4310 191.11
51433 Doubletree Hotel-Port Angeles 18112 PW Director Candidates Accomod 755 4310
~ 51494 Waste Management - Northwest 23060 Recycling services for April 755 4150 40,330.09
Recycling services for May 755 4150
Total for Public Works 99,981.92
Total for Solid Waste Fund 99,939.81
421 C~(Y9 51102 Everwarm Inc. 05013 Attic insulation-K Morris 913 4986 67.42
51356 Getchell, Ouane 07283 Heat pump rebate 913 49~
51386 Rosand, Jim 18325 Heat pump rebate 913 4986 250.00
Total for Conservation Fund 567.~
501 51106 Call's Inc. 07027 Universal stacking systems 501 2370(0)0 21.9(r-
51108 Grafix Shoppe (Inc) 07116 Vehicle marking kits 501 23700CX) 35.55-
51122 NcLoughLin & Eardley Corp. 13300 Amber strobe 501 23700(X)
51148 Seal Methods Equipment Inc. 19064 Gutter broom motor 501 2370000 47.08-
51278 Rotary Corporation 18017 Tire lugs 501 2370000 13.75-
Total for Department 140.~-
0007 51075 Barnett I~lement Company 02357 Lawn vaccuum 760 6410 9,679.70
511~ Call's Inc. 07027 Universal stacking systems 760 3101 149.97
Universal stacking systems 760 3101 149.96
511~ Grafix Shoppe (Inc) 07116 Vehicle marking kits 760 3101 242.78
Vehicle marking kits 760 3101 242.~
-~ 51122 McLoughlin & Eardley Corp. 13300 Amber strobe 7~ 3101 307.~
51127 N C Machinery Co. 14001 Door for CAT dozer 7603101 1,307.78
51147 Schneider Trucking Inc 19581 Transporting services 760 4810 127.50
51148 Seal Methods Equipment Inc. 19064 Gutter broom motor 760 3101 643.01
51153 Territorial Supplies Inc. 2CX301 Strobe kit, lexan partition, lan 7~ 3101 1,347.75
53
~/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Opt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
Strobe kit, Lexan partition, Lan 760 3101 1,347.75
Shipping-repair headlight 760 3101 12.95
Shipping for partitions 760 3qOq 52.98
Shipping for partitions 76C) 3101 52.98
Compact speaker 76C) 3101 160.~
Compact speaker 760 3101 160.82
Repair random headlight flash 760 3101 50.~
Panel 760 3101 24.03
Panel 760 3101 24.03
Credit-repairs to headlight 760 3101 50.~-
SLickStik, ArrowStik filters 760 3101 403.53
SLickStik, ArrowStik filters 7~) 3101 44)3.52
Panel 760 3101 24.03
Panel 760 3101 24.03
51158 Viking Office Products 22054 Folders, spirals, pens 760 3101 12.91
511~ Western Equipment Distrib. Irc 23019 Belt 760 3101 92.80
Switch 760 3101 116.25
51167 Western Power & Equipment 23276 Wheel 760 3101 243.84
51171 Zee Medical Service Co. 26005 First aid supplies 760 3101 32.80
51181 Angeles Auto Alectric 01067 Starter 760 3101 203.93
51201 Chevron USA (Credit Card pmts) 03060 April credit card purchases 760 3210 138.~1
51204 Cornell Auto Parts 03092 Fitting 760 3101
Credit alternator core 760 3101 25.~J-
Galvanized Lug 760 3101 19.00
Air sensor 760 3101 23.43
Starter 760 3101 70.28
Credit starter core 760 3101 19.42-
Exhaust pipe 760 3101 29.90
51208 Oenver's Tire Co. Inc. 040z~4 Mount, demount, balance 760 ~10 34.53
Mount, demount, balance 760 4810 17.26
Flat repair 760 ~10 18.88
Mount, demount, balance 760 ~10 17.26
Mount, demount, balance 7600 4810 17.26
Tires, idler arm, pitman arm 7603101 350.67
Tires, idler arm, pitman arm 760 4810 79.26
Labor, clamps, antifreeze 760 4810 ~0.~
Mount, demount, balance 760 ~d~lO 17.26
Service call, starter, Labor 760 3101 278.38
Service call, starter, Labor 760 4810 65.28
Safety check, labor, lubra klean 760 3101 13.22
Safety check, Labor, Lubra kCeen 760 4810 17.26
Mount, demount, balance 760 ~810 22.66
ALternator, Labor 760 3101 217.95
ALternator, Labor 760 /,810 43.71
Mount, demount, balance 760 ~10 17.26
Mount, demount, balance 760 4810 21.58
Flat repair 7~) 4810
FLat repair 760 Zd~lO
Mount, demount, balance 760 4810 17.26
Tires, valve stem 760 3101 147.15
FLat repair, wheel change 7604810 24.28
54
~9/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1990 Page 25
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
Tube, demount, mount 760 3101 45.27
Flat repair, wheel change 760 4810 22.12
Flat repair, wheel change 760 4810 22.12
Hount, demount, balance 760 4810 34.53
Labor, steering repair 760 4810 39.11
Flat repair, wheel change 760 4810 27.51
Hount, demount, balance 760 4810 34.53
Labor, mount, balance, demount 760 3101 14.56
Labor/ mount/ balance, demount 760 4810 51.80
Service call, charge battery 760 4810 40.46
Flat repair, wheel change 760 4810 27.51
Hount, demount, balance 760 4810 34.53
Wheel change,flat repair,tires 760 4810 90.64
Wheel change, flat repair,tires 760 3101 513.60
Brake shoes, labor, lubra klean 760 3101 47.75
Brake shoes, labor, lubra klean 760 4810 51.79
Labor, lubra klean, antifreeze 760 3101 16.46
Labor, Lubra kLeen, antifreeze 760 4810 17.26
Tires, mount, balance 760 4810 45.31
Tires, mount, balance 760 3101 224.44
-- Wheel alignment 760 4810 37.77
ALternator belt,pump belt,labo 760 3101 30.22
Alternator belt,pump belt,labo 760 4810 29.13
Tire, wheel balance 760 3101 108.98
Flat repair, tires, casing 760 4810 76.06
Flat repair, tires, casing 760 3101 504.29
Tires, balance, labor 760 3101 302.18
Tires, balance, Labor 760 4810 41.00
Tires, balance, mount, demount 760 3101 147.02
Tires, balance, mount, demount 760 4810 39.92
51210 Dobson's 04054 Seal 760 3101 3.63
51217 Ferrellgas (Inc) 06024 Propane 760 3212 166.90
Propane 760 3212 257.B6
51221 H & R Parts & Equipment Inc. 08045 Air switch 760 3101 27.13
Seal 760 3101 37.64
0 ring, gasket, clamp, hose 760 3101 129.75
Laap, housing 760 3101 45.32
51224 HeartLine, The 08054 Battery 760 3101 150.95
Battery 760 3101 56.05
Battery 760 3101 75.48
Battery 760 3101 59.29
51232 Lincoln Industrial Corp. 12047 Align front.end, Labor 760 4810 71.69
Repair truck troff tank 760 4810 1,372.49
51236 Middleton Auto and Truck Inc. 13117 Fitting, fuse, brake, swivel 760 3101 168.56
Halogen Lamp 7603101 19.29
Thermostat, gasket 760 3101 5.55
Power outlet 760 3101 6.88
Switch 760 3101 28.48
Fittings 760 3101 27.76
Fitting 760 3101 35.21
Hose clamp 760 3101 38.74
55
99/~/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 26
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
Disc pad 760 3101 33.67
PVC valve, cleaner 760 3101 16.97
Air filter 760 3101
Sensors 760 3101 24.59
Fuse/filters,switch,hose-end 76~) 3101 96.42
Oil filter 7(>0 3101 18.47
Credit sensor 760 3101 8.62-
Switch, fitting 7~) 3101 13.04
Brake fluid 760 3101 17.93
Floc~ lamp 760 3101 20.15
Halc~gen lights 760 3101 31.01
Fuel sending unit 760 3101 190.37
Flat washer 7~) 3101 34.42
Plug 760 3101 7.~
Break-away switch 760 3101 8.69
Lock-nut 760 3101 30.~
Cap screw 7603101 130.88
Battery 760 3101 3.23
Hose coupling, coupler 760 3101 52.83
Control az)dule for ignition 7603101 6~.34
Control cable 760 3101 69~
Brake cleaner,filters,fitting 760 3101 105
Filter, fittings, hex nipple 760 3101 75.4Y
Fitting 7603101 9.47
Glove 760 3101 5.39
Plug, gasket 7603101 3.09
Masking tape 7603101 12.91
Air hose 760 3101 29.26
Hose 760 3101 13.68
O-ring, gasket 760 3101 37.38
Bulbs,terminals,filters,swivel 760 3101 122.90
Lamp 760 3101 6.90
Nut,cap screws,washer,nipple 760 3101 134.65
Wiring Loom 760 3101 9.82
V-belts 760 3101 26.15
Flat washer 760 3101 6.79
U-bolt 760 3101 2.59
Terminal 760 3101 9.65
Cap screw,filter,clamp,flasher 760 3101 142.19
Fuse, filter, cap, fitting 760 3101 28.91
Bulbs 760 3101 95.94
Threadlock 760 3101 43.07
Headlights 760 3101 40.55
Wheel cylinder 760 3101 32.95
ELbows 760 3101 36.27
51242 Novus Windshield Repair 14206 GLass, Labor 760 3101 145.67
Windshield repair, Labor 760 3101 172 '-'
51250 OLympic Laundry & Clnrs Inc. 15026 Cleaning services-March 760 49~0 217
Cleaning services 760 4990 202.41
51263 Peninsula Daily News 16012 Bid invitation-Sweeper 760 4410 120.12
51264 Pettit Oil Company 16302 Oil, haz mat 760 3220 550.80
~/06/I0-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1~ Page 27
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To (~5/10/1999
Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
April cardLock 760 3211 35.21
April cardLock 760 3210 2,625.42
Diesel fuel 760 3211 229.75
Diesel fuel 760 3211 3,576.80
GasoLine 760 3210 3,555.00
Diesel fuel 760 3211 242.54
Stock grease pump unit 7603501 670.05
Stock grease pump unit 760 3101 195.06
51266 Port Angeles Ford Lincoln 16158 Door handle 760 3101 38.01
51269 Quality 4x4 Truck Supply 17006 Solenoid 760 3101 259.78
51276 Richmond 2-Way Radio 18)09 Replace transistors for siren 760 4,~10 103.58
51278 Rotary Corporation 18017 Tire lugs 760 3101 187.75
51279 RuddeLl Auto Mall 18019 Lock assembly 760 3101 80.16
Fuel gauge 760 3101 50.65
51286 Simpson's Used Auto Parts 19199 Towing services-sweeper 760 4810 134.87
51295 Swain's General Store Inc. 19037 Shovel 760 3101
FLashlight, galvanized nipple 7~) 3101 16.83
Utility knife, tape reel 76C) 3101 38.90
Hinges 700 3101 14.39
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 March Scan charges 760 4210 16.42
April Scan charges 760 4210 17.34
51309 Washington (DOL), State of 04051 Special Fuel License 760 3211 759.90
51310 Washington (OOL), State of 23218 Underground storage tank Lic 760 4950 2(~).C)0
51313 Washington Fire & Safety Equip 23004 Service extinguishers,brackets 760 4810 149.12
51357 Goedyear Tire & Service Cntr 07284 Tires-vehicle #1580 760 3101 392.52
51360 Kamen Industrial Technologies 11082 Seal 760 3101 14.45
Ball bearing flange unit 760 3101 139.20
51367 N C Machinery Co. 14001 Credit gasket 760 3101 3.33-
Credit Rod 760 3101 25.93-
Filters 760 3101 82.26
Washer, pawl 760 3101 21.76
Ring,gasket,stud,boLt,Lock-nut 760 3101 131.75
Locknut 760 3101 8.85
Gaskets 760 3101 5.71
Gasket, pump assembly 7603101 66.75
51375 Pacific Utility Equipment Inc. 21011 Shocks 760 3101
51379 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement 760 3101 17.25
Petty cash reimbursement 760 3101
51388 Schwab Tire Center, Les 19459 Tires-trailer 760 3101 285.42
51395 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware 19035 Credit chuck 760 3101 49.~-
Washers 760 3101 21.69
Wiper ring/O-ring, Labor 7603101 119.38
Anchor, gloves, spring 760 3101 52.44
ELbow, adapter 760 3101 4.20
Fender wash 760 3101 .91
Pipe bushing, labor 760 3101 4.89
Fender wash 760 3101 4.27
Elbow, adapter, valve 760 3101 4.41
Cement 760 3101 1.72
Bushing 760 3101 2.04
Cap 760 3101 1.08
57
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - ~K LIVE June 10 1~ Page 28
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To ~/10/1~
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Cede A~ount
Humber Name Number Humber
Seal kit, Labor 760 3101 78.34
Draw hasp 760 3101 15.65
Tee, bushing, nipple 760 3101 21.14
Chuck 760 3101 49.8/+
51396 Tranco Transmissions Inc. 20036 Remove/replace transmission 760 3101 861.91
Remove/replace transmission 760 4810 336.64
Replace sensors,solenoid, Labor 760 3101 3~.26
Replace sensors,solenoid, Labor 760 4810 224.43
51400 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 760 4210 22.90
Total for Public Works 44,750.81
Total for Equipment Services Fund 44,609.93
502 ~2 51090 Custom Computer Sales & Serv. 03381 Sound card 250 3101 48.56
51182 Angeles Communications Inc 01069 Add ext 4607 in training room 250 4210 48.56
51251 OLympic Paper Company 15111 Paper, greenbar paper 250 3101 295.97
51252 Olympic Printers Inc. 15027 Mailing Labels 250 3101 30.32
Business cards-Kheriaty,Papand 250 3101 26.22
51272 Radix Corporation 18004 Service meter reading handheld 250 4810 122.50
51302 United Parcel Service 21005 Shipping services-May 250 4210 13
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 March Scan charges 250 4210
April Scan charges 250 4210 25.~
MS Windows NT 4.0 250 4810 53.42
MS Select License Activity-Mar 250 4810 1,271.25
MS Select License Activity-Apr 250 4810 201.95
51312 Washington (Uneaq~), State of 23178 1st Qtr 1999 unemployment 250 9626 3,369.11-
51379 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement 250 3101 2.79
51400 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing 250 4210 68.70
Total for Information Systems Fund 1,0~r~.61-
503 O00q 51077 Beverford, Bill 02017 Reimbursement-chiropractic fee 121 4630 20.00
510~ Clallam County YMCA 03076 Membership- K Curtis 121 4150 570.00
51093 Oaugaard, Vern 04234 Reimbursement-chiropractic fee 121 ~6~0 60.00
51095 Oept of Labor & Ind (Qrtr rpt) 04046 Ist Quarter 1999 Worker's Comp 118 4950 14,442.32
51101 Evergreen Adjustment Service 05177 Adjustment Svc-Claim #15-97 119 4999 896.40
51110 Headrick, Camille 08015 Reimbursement-chiropractic fee 121 4630 60.00
51117 Lemon/ Marty 12258 Reimbursement-chiropractic fee 121 4630 60.00
51133 Olympic Iron Club 15025 Membership-M Vanderziel 121 4150 355.00
Membership-K Money 121 4150 355.00
51150 Siebens, Terry 19075 Reimbursement-hospital svcs 121 4630 375.0t
51271 RJS & Associates 18323 Prof Labor Relation Svcs-Narch 119 4150 1,147.66
51318 Port of Port Angeles 16027 Settlement of Claim #4-98 119 4999 13,091.31
51325 AWC Employee Benefit Trust 01231 June insurance premium 121 4630 74,455.65
June insurance premium 121 4632 1,234.40
June insurance premium 121 4634 11,71/
51334 Armory Express Pizzeria 01340 Safety meeting Lunch 118 4909 5~
51345 Clallam County YMCA 03076 Membership-B Oliver 121 4150 399.00
Mea~oership-T Reid 121 4150 570.C~
51385 Regence BLue Shield-Dental 18~34 Administrative fee-June dental 117 4~)I 1,578.90
§8
~/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - ~K LIVE June 10 1~ Page 29
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/~/1999 To 06/10/19~
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
51387 Sanders, Hike 19336 Reimbursmnt-chiropractic svcs 121 4~30 40.00
51393 Summit Law Group PLLC 19437 General Labor Representation 119 4150 562.00
51397 UNUM Life Ins Co of America 210(0) LTD Coverage-June 99 121 ~31 1,670.95
51416 Bishop, Virgil 02019 Reimburse June Medicare Prem 121 ~35 94.00
51423 Cameron, Kenneth 03252 Reimburse June Medicare Prem 121 4635 68.30
51425 Camporini, Richard 0327'~ Reimburse June Medicare Prem 121 4635 46.10
51430 Cleland, Mike 03263 Disability Board Claint-May 121 4634 135.97
51437 Evans, Sid 05103 Reimburse June Medicare Prem 121 4635 42.50
51~. Hansen, George D. 08048 Reimburse June Medicare Prem 121 4635 ~.~0
51~7 Headrick, Camille 08015 Reimburse in-patient services 121 4630 3?5.00
51451 Johnson, Donald G 10052 Disability Board Claim-May 121 z~5~4 7'~5.51
Reimburse June Medicare Prem 121 ~35 43.80
51452 Johnson, Harry 10047 Disability Board Claim-May 121 4634 158.21
Reimburse June Medicare Prem 121 ~35 45.50
51454 Kochanek, Harry 11017 Reimburse June Medicare Prem 121 4635
51457 Lindley, James K. 12019 Reimburse June Medicare Prem 121 ~35 45.50
51458 Loucks, Jasper 12186 Disability Board Claim-May 121 4634 7.00
Reimburse June Medicare Prem 121 4635
51462 Merriwether, James 13113 Disability Board Claim-May 121 ~34 479.~4
51463 Miesel, Phil 13261 Reimburse June Medicere Prem 121 ~35 ~.10
~ 51~6 Morgan, Roy 13145 Reimburse June Medicare Prem 121 ~35 ~.10
51467 Myers, William 13130 Reimburse June Medicare Prem 121 4635 45.50
51468 NW Admin Transfer Acct 14169 Teamsters Insurance Prem-June 121 4633 11,7'~.65
51485 Sweatt, Johnnie 19146 Reimburse June Medicare Prem 121 4635 65.70
Total for Self - Insurance Fund 138,181.19
602 0002 51325 AWC Employee Benefit Trust 01231 June insurance premium 25 4635 2,565.00
51418 Braun, Gary 021'F~ Disability Board Claim-May 225 4635 47.36
51424 Campbell, Mack 03045 Disability Board Claims-May 225 4635 128.25
Total for Firemen's Pension Fund 2,740.61
621 0002 51082 Clallam County Housing 03305 Contractor pmt for Lee Hotel- 214 4150 ~,934.83
51~ Cozi Homes Construction 032~ Contrmctor pmt-K Schoenfeldt 214 4150 5,4?5.93
51114 Kathol Construction 11178 Contractor pmt-D Anderson 214 4150 4,~7.87
51136 Paratex Certified Inc. 16219 Pest inspection-L Bourm 214 4150 64.?4
51187 Angeles Plumbing Inc. 01039 Final pmt-Rick Moon 214 4150 259.60
51283 Schoenfeldt Construction, Dick 19141 Contractor pmt-S McCaslin 214 4150 512.53
51333 Angeles Plumbing Inc. 01039 Final pmt-P Simpson 214 4150 706.99
51376 Paratex Certified Inc. 16219 Pest inspection-B Matney 214 4150 (>4.74
51422 CMU Construction 03416 Contract pmt-L Malone 214 4150 175.00
51472 Olympic Electric Co. Inc. 15024 Final pmt-P Simpson 214 4150 58.27
Total for P.A. Housing ReHeb Project 56,140.50
(-m=0008 51099 Domino's Pizza - 7120 04(~B7 Pizzas-After School Program 8883101 42.07
51129 Newbridge Educ. Pr~rams 14430 Seasonal packs-May days ~8 3101 18.83
51137 Peninsula Bottling Co. Inc. 16071 Soda for Fishing Derby ~ 3101 155.50
Credit soda for Fishing Derby ~ 3101 30.(~-
51139 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reimbursement ~ 3101 12.00
50
99/06/10-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 30
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/C)8/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Cc~]e Amount
Number Name Number Number
Petty cash reimbursement ~ 3101 24.18
Petty cash reimbursement ~3q01 30.00
Petty cash reimbursement ~3101 5.17
Petty cash reimbursement ~3101 50.00
51209 District 13 (~050 Softball Umpire pmts-lst half 881 4150 2,700.00
ASA Softball Registr, Field Ins ~I 4150 2,600.00
51215 Evergreen Meats 05033 Food for fishing derby ~ 3101 62.01
51227 Jim's Pharmacy (Inc) 10020 Ice packs ~ 3101 11.25
51252 Olympic Printers Irc. 15027 Mailing labels ~ 3101 60.65
51254 Olympic Stationers Irc. 15030 Rubber bands ~ 3101 1.50
Paper ~ 3101 32.36
Tissue paper,construction pape ~8 3101 18.16
Raffle tickets ~ 3101 9.17
51265 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03~2 Petty cash reimbursement ~8 3101 33.78
51274 Reliable Racing Supply Inc 18320 Anchor 881 3120 66.97
51292 SuperValu Cash & Carry 23016 Food for fishing derby ~8 3101 ~.41
51295 Swain's General Store Inc. 19037 Paint, accessories ~8 3101 5.11
Fishing derby gift certificate 888 3101 250.00
Fishing rods,fishing accessori ~ 3101 241.C~
Fishing derby gift certificate ~ 3101 55.00
Slow pitch balls ~1 3120 437r~
Total for Recreational Activities Fund 6,936.zU
627 0005 51198 Camera Corner 03044 Slides, batteries 531 3101 112.43
Total for D.A.R.E. Fund 112.43
652 0008 51216 Federal Express Corp. 06022 Shipping services-April ~ 4210 9.35
51254 Olympic Stationers Inc. 15030 Cover paper 868 3101 11.36
Fiber paper 868 3101 16.02
51295 Swain's General Store Inc. 19037 WD-40, hardware 868 3120 4.43
51308 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 March Scan charges ~ ~10 49.39
April Scan charges ~ ~10 33.13
51323 ARTnews 01311 Annual subscription renewal 8684901 43.11
51391 Seniuk, Jake 19014 Reimburse expenses pe 5-21-99 ~ 3101 114.50
Reimburse expenses pe 5-21-9~ 868 4310 35.21
Reimburse expenses pe 5-21-99 ~58 4210 6.60
Reimburse expenses pe 5-21-99 868 3210 36.38
Reimburse expenses pe 5-21-99 868 3120 8.35
51~)0 US West Communications 21001 5-14 Billing ~ 4210 22.90
51/~88 US West Colmunications 21001 5-23 Billing ~ 4210 47.81
Total for Esther Webster Trust Fund 438.54
654 ~ 51183 Angeles Concrete Prcziucts 01070 Concrete 8~ 3199 545.70
51186 Angeles Millwork 01073 Stakes 87~ 3199
Paint 8D 3199 1L
Lap siding, lumber 87~ 3199 56.T~
Self-drilling screws, bit 87~ 3199 22.7'2
Surveyor tape 87~ 3199
60
TI'
99/06/10-11:07 City of Pont Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1999 Page 31
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
Lumber 873 3199 9.56
Lumber,plywood, hex cap, washer 87'5 3199 374.24
Lumber 873 3199 25.10
Hardware 873'5 3199 6.~
PLywood, Lumber 873"5 3199 129.22
Epoxy gel 87'5 3199 3.27
Hex lags, brush, sandpaper 873 3199 26.79
Credit Hex Lags 873 3199 1.94-
Hex lags, flat washer 873 3199 17.18
51194 Blake Sand & Gravel Inc. 02045 Stakes 873 3199 47.~
Sand 873 3199 7.01
Blended soil 873 3199 40.80
51202 Clallam Cooperative Assn Inc. 03063 Trash can 873 3199 17.25
51223 Hartnagel Building Supply Inc. 08052 Wedge anchor 87'5 3199 6.47
Epoxy 873 3199 3.10
Rotary drill bits 873 3199 8.52
Wedge anchor 873 3199 6.47
51232 Lincoln Industrial Corp. 12047 Sheet metal 87'5 3199 32.72
51295 Swein's General Store Inc. 19037 Housewares 873 3199 9.61
51374 Olympic Topiary 15180 Pier Topiary-Octopus Sculpture 873 3101 2,158.(X)
~ 51395 Sunset Do-It Best Hardware 19035 Deck screw 873 3199 3.87
Drill bit, washer, stop nuts 873 3199 28.~
Total for Waterfront Trail Fund 3,606.25
657 51085 Clallam Jefferson lAC Inc. 03022 Pass the Buck Funds 657 2399100 1,000.00
Total for Utility Contribution Pr~ram
698 51116 LEOFF 12(~3 April contributions 698 2315120 28,337.24
51135 PERS 16016 April contributions 698 2315130 70,~8.7T
51218 Flex-Plan Services (Payroll) 06062 Payroll deductions pe 5L16-99 698 2315210 1,4(~+.76
51245 Office of Support Enforcement 15072 Payroll deductions pe 5-16-99 698 2315210 939.69
512~ Office of Support Enforcement 151~ Payroll deductions pe 5-16-99 69B 2315210 89.~
51289 States West Life Insurance Co. 19313 Supplemental Life Ins-June 99 698 2315160 701.10
51299 US Department of Education 21075 Payroll deductions pe 5-16-99 698 2315210 69.41
51304 United Way (payroll) 21028 Payroll deductions pe 5-16-99 698 2315240 507.89
51307 Volunteer Fire Association 22060 Payroll deductions pe 5-16-99 698 2315210 40.00
51412 AFSCME Local #1619 01152 Payroll deductions pe 5-30-99 698 2315200 84.CX)
51413 AFSCME Local #1619 Scholarship 01153 Payroll deductions pe 5-30-99 698 23152CX) 168.00
51435 Employees Association 05041 Payroll deductions pe 5-30-99 698 2315210 256.CX~
51440 Firefighter's Local #656 060?6 Payroll deductions ~e 5-30-99 698 2315200 800.00
51441 Flex-Plan Services (Payroll) ~2 Payroll deductions ~e 5-30-99 698 2315210 1,40/+.76
51443 Fortis Benefits Insurance Co. 06052 Payroll deductions oe 5-30-99 698 2315190 66C).61
51449 IBEW Local #997 09034 Payroll deductions 3e 5-30-99 698 2315200 384.20
51470 Office of Support Enforcement 15072 Payroll deductions =e 5-30-99 698 2315210 939.69
51471 Office of Support Enforcement 151~ Payroll deductions ~e 5-30-99 698 2315210 89.C~
51476 Police Association 16156 Payroll deductions ~e 5-30-99 698 2315210 165.00
51/~86 Teamsters Local #589 20056 Payroll deductions )e 5-30-99 698 2315200 1,697.CX)
51~7 US Department of Education 21075 Payroll deductions )e 5-30-99 698 2315210 69.41
51/.89 United Way (payroll) 21028 Payroll deductions )e 5-30-99 698 2315240 507.89
61
~/~/I0-11:07 City of Port Angeles - Y2K LIVE June 10 1~ Page
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 05/08/1999 To 06/10/1999
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code A~ount
Number Name Number Number
51491 WSCCCE, AFSCME, AFL-CIO 23167 Payroll deductions pe 5-30-99 698 2315200 2,718.8~
Total for Accounts Payable Clearing Fund 112,862.42
Grand Total 1,272,812.99
62
WASHINGTON, U,S.A.
CITY MaNager's office
June 15, 1999
';., ~'~".':: TO: Peninsula Daily News FAX: 417-3521
!'!"!::: ' KONP Radio KKNW Radio FAX: 457-9114
.~,":':i :,:', Northland Cable (Ch. 3) FAX: 457-5901
.i, PUBLIC INFORMATION ANNOUNCEMENT
:: , June 15, 1999
: ', A new toll will not be added to the Hood Canal Bridge. The washington State Department of
Transportation will not impose a bridge user fee to fund much needed repairs and part!al
replacement of the aging span scheduled for 2004.
· Department of Transportation representatives announced their decision to the Blue Ribbon
Transportation Commission at an early, morning meeting at the SeaTac International Airport
· Auditorium today. Officials from Sequim, Bremerton, and Port Angeles, as well as the-Clallam
'~ ~. County EDC, were on hand to receive the good news. They also provided testimony to the
'~. Commission about the impact of a toll on Peninsula residents and our local economy.
" "This is a milestone" remarked Port Angeles City Council member Larry Williams. "We've been
, · .
dogging rumors that a 'user fee' would be set up as pan of the repair and preservation process.
i Evidently WSDOT has reconsidered its position. It will be a. pleasure to give the Mayor and City
Council a more detailed report at the Council meeting tonight."
The Port Angeles City Council supported a limited toll after a portion of the bridge sank in a
' storm just 20 year ago. About 6 months after the toll began, the Council joined other Peninsula
'. groups to oppose toll increases and the use of bridge tolls in support of the state ferry system.
Additional details on this story will be forwarded to the media as they become available.
IS
G:~EXGHANG E\{ITYMG R~RIOGTO ,I..WPO
321 EAST FIFTH STREET ® P. O. BOX 1150 ® PORT ANGELES, WA 98362-0217
PHONE: 360-417-4500 ® FAX: 360-417-4509 ® TTY: 360-417-4645
E-MAIL: CITYM GR~CI. PO RT-AN Ge LES.WA. U S
pORTANG L S
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: June 15, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN ~aXlD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jack Pittis, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Water SCADA Bids
Issue: Bid award for providing turnkey water Supervisory Control and Data Acquisiti5n (SCADA) system.I
Recommendation: Staff, with UAC concurrence, recommend that the City Council authorize the Mayor[
~o s~ ~ ~ ~vith S&B, Inc. for the hardware, software, and installation of a water SCADA system. I
Summary_: The existing alarm monitoring and limited control system at the Ranney well has become very
unreliable. Two years ago the City started looking at replacement options including a full SCADA system. At, er
hiring the consulting firm of' CH2M Hill to evaluate options, the decision was made to move towards a SCADA
system that would integrate all of the City's utilities. The water system SCADA is the first step and at, er issuing
an RFP, the firm of S&B, Inc. was determined to offer the best product. $100,000 was included in the 1999
budget for this project.
Backeround / Analysis: The City issued a request for proposals (RFP) for a water SCADA system in March
and received three proposals by the closing date of April 23, 1999. Proposals were received from AGI
Technologies, S & B, Inc., and Technical Systems Inc. (TSI). The process that the City chose to solicit proposals
under was competitive negotiation where both price and quality of product are used to evaluate proposals. State
law allows cities to use the competitive negotiation process (rather than formal bidding) for obtaining computer
products and services. After reviewing the proposals, checking references and visiting a site where similar
equipment has been installed, staff has concluded that the best proposal is the one submitted by S&B.
Proposals were rated using the following criteria: total overall impression of the proposal submitted, experience
and results of similar projects, experience of the project manager, understanding of the project, experience and
knowledge of local conditions, ability to provide ongoing maintenance services, and cost. Very little separated
the top two vendors, S&B and TSI, except for the cost. Cost of the three base proposals in shown in the table
below. (scope of work attached)
AGI $170,000
S&B $91,100
TSI $111,255
Staffis currently working on a contract for this project and is evaluating several optional items suggested by S&B.
However, so as not to delay the project we would like to move forward with authorization to negotiate a not to
exceed contract in the amount of *100,000. NSPWKSXLIGHTXDIRECTORXMEMOSXSEADABID.,~I~
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
The following Scope of Work is intended to design and implement a SCADA System
that will monitor and control critical aspects of the City's Community Water System.
This will include the provision of the following:
I. At the Ranney Collector
S&B is to provide and install a Siemens 545 Remote Telemetric Unit (RTU) to operate,
control and monitor the Ranney Well Pumps (2), Chlorine Feed Pumps (2)*, Residual
Chlorine Meter, Turbidometer, and Pressure Gauges. An operator interface module
shall be mounted in the panel, and will allow local viewing of all alarms, events and
analog values generated at the site. The capability to program and download
information from the RTU, either on site or remotely, will be provided. Also, the
capability to control the well pumps and chlorine feed pumps both locally and remotely
will be provided. A battery and charger will be provided for the RTU.
In addition, the following commands, events/status points, alarm points, and analog
data shall be incorporated in the system provided by S&B. All interfaces required
between existing or new equipment and the RTU, including modem access to the
Master Telemetric Unit (MTU) at the Corp Yard, will be provided and installed by S& B
or its subcontractor.
A. Commands to Site
Pump 1 early start/stop
Pump 2 early start/stop
force Pump 1 on/off
force Pump 2 on/off
alternate pumps
disable alternator
B. Events/Status Points
10,000 gallon flow pulse CI2 Booster 1 in Auto
Pump 1 in Auto Cl2 Booster 1 Run
Pump 1 Run CI2 Booster 2 in Auto
Pump 2 in Auto Gl2 Booster 2 Run
Pump 2 Run CI2 Booster 3 in Auto
Generator Run CI2 Booster 3 Run
C. Alarm Points
RTU trouble Pump I Fail
Power Fail Pump 1 Start Limited
Low Battery Pump 1 Pressure Fail
64
Pump 2 Fail Pressure Low
Pump 2 Start Limited Pressure High
Pump 2 Pressure Fail Flow Low
Chlorine Leak Alarm - Storage Flow High
Chlorine Leak Alarm - Feed Rm. Chlorine Low
Generator Fail Chlorine High
Phase Failure Turbidity High
Low Water Warning Turbidity Very High
Low Water Cutoff Handshake Timeout
Surge Tank H/L Level Communication Checksum Fail
Low Air Pressure Communication No Response
Caisson Low
Caisson High
D. Analog Data
Caisson Level - current level and record level every 15 minutes*
Flow Rate
Pipeline Pressure
Turbidity - current level and record level every 15 minutes
CI2 Residual - current level and record level every 15 minutes
RTU Battery Voltage
Pump I Run Hours
Pump I Starts
Pump 2 Run Hours
Pump 2 Starts
*Italicized requirements were not mentioned explicitly in S&B's proposal, but need to be
included. (They may have been required in the RFP).
II. At the Black Diamond Reservoir
S&B is to provide and install a Siemens 545 Remote Telemetric Unit (RTU) to monitor
the reservoir level, flow, residual chlorine level, and other items, and communicate with
the MTU via modem. A battery and charger will be provided for the RTU. An operator
interface module shall be mounted in the panel, and will allow local viewing of all
alarms, events and analog values generated at the site. The capability to program and
download information from the RTU, either on site or remotely, will be provided. The
capability to control a future liquid chlorine injection system will also be provided.
In addition, the following events/status points, alarm points, and analog data shall be
incorporated in the system provided by S&B. All interfaces required between existing or
new equipment and the RTU, including modem access to the MTU at the Corp Yard,
will be provided and installed by S& B or its subcontractor.
65
A. Events/Status Points
1,000 Gallon Flow Pulse
B. Alarm Points
RTU Trouble Chlorine Low
Power Fail Chlorine High
Low Battery Turbidity High
Sodium Hypochlorite Leak Turbidity Very High
Reservoir Low Handshake Timeout
Reservoir High Communication Checksum Fail
Flow Low Communication No Response
Flow High
C. Analog Data
Reservoir Level - current level and record level every 15 minutes
Flow Rate
Cl2 Residual - current level and record level every 15 minutes
Flow Volume (or a totalizing of Flow Rate) - current level and record level every
15 minutes
III. At the Peabody Heights Reservoir and Mill Creek Pump Station
S&B is to provide and install a Siemens 545 Remote Telemetric Unit (RTU) at this site,
replacing an Allen Bradley 5~03 PLC that monitors and controls just the Pump Station.
This RTU will monitor the reservoir level, flow, residual chlorine level and other levels,
and communicate with the MTU via modem. It will also monitor and control the four
pumps in the Mill Creek Pump Station. An. operator interface module shall be mounted
in the panel, and will allow local viewing of all alarms, events and analog values
generated at the site. A battery and charger will be provided for the RTU. The
capability to program and download information from the RTU, either on site or
remotely, will be provided. The capability to control the liquid chlorine injection system
in the future will also be provided.
In addition, the following commands, events/status points, alarm points, and analog
data shall be incorporated in the system provided by S&B. All interfaces required
between existing or new equipment and the RTU, including modem access to the MTU
at the Corp Yard, will be provided and installed by S& B or its subcontractor.
A. Commands to Site
Mill Creek (MC) Pump 1 early MC Pump 4 early start/stop
start/stop Force MC Pump 1 On/Off
MC Pump 2 early start/stop Force MC Pump 2 On/Off
MC Pump 3 early start/stop Force MC Pump 3 On/Off
66
Force MC Pump 4 On/Off Disable Alternator
Alternate Pumps
B. Events/Status Points
Flow Pulse MC Pump 3 Run
MC Pump 1 Auto MC Pump 4 Auto
MC Pump 1 Run MC Pump 4 Run
MC Pump 2 Auto Generator Run
MC Pump 2 Run 1,000 Gallon Flow Pulse
MC Pump 3 Auto
C. Alarm Points
RTU Trouble Reservoir Low
Power Fail Reservoir High
Low Battery Pressure Low (MC Outlet)
Setpoint Error Pressure High (MC Outlet)
MC Pump 1 Fail Flow Low
MC Pump 1 Start Limited Flow High
MC Pump 2 Fail Chlorine Low
MC Pump 2 Start Limited Chlorine High
MC Pump 3 Fail Mill Creek Reservoir Low
MC Pump 3 Start Limited Mill Creek Reservoir High
MC Pump 4 Fail Handshake Timeout
MC Pump 4 Start Limited Comm. Checksum Fail
Sodium Hypochlorite Leak Comm. No Response
Mill Creek Signal Fail
Generator Fail
D. Analog Data
Reservoir Level - current level and record level every 15 minutes
Flow Rate - Peabody Heights Reservoir Inlet - current & record
Flow Rate - Peabody Heights Reservoir Outlet - current & record
Flow Rate - Mill Creek Pump Station Outlet - current & record
Pipeline Pressure (MC Outlet)
CI2 Residual - current level and record level every 15 minutes
RTU Battery Voltage
Mill Creek Reservoir Level
MC Pump 1 Run Hours
MC Pump 1 Starts
MC Pump 2 Run Hours
MC Pump 2 Starts
MC Pump 3 Run Hours
67
MC Pump 3 Starts
MC Pump 4 Run Hours
MC Pump 4 Starts
IV. At the Corp Yard
S&B is to provide and install a Siemens 545 Master Telemetric Unit (MTU) at this site,
including multiple programmable communication modules, Bell202 modems, a TNIS
unit, an uninterruptible power source (UPS) for back-up power, and a serial link to a
graphical user interface (GUI) computer system running Siemens WinCC. This system
will provide the platform for alarm processing, communication and control of remote
facilities. Alarm processing, communication and control will normally occur through the
GUI, but will also be possible through an operator interface module on the MTU in case
of temporary loss of the GUI.
The GUI computer supplied will be at a minimum based on a Pentium 11-450 with
128MB ram and 10GB hard disk space. It will be capable of using multi-media and
networking. S & B will supply and load the Siemens WinCC software, as well as
complete and troubleshoot all programming of the MTU and related interfaces. The
GUI's monitor will be a minimum 17" screen.
S & B will provide both screen and audible alarms for this site, as well as the capability
to remotely acknowledge alarms via modem. An auto dialer will also be provided. All
electrical and communication wiring between effected new and existing hardware will
be completed by S & B or its subcontractor.
V. General Requirements
S& B will provide one onsite meeting with City personnel before start of project, and at
least two onsite meetings during implementation (in addition to required onsite work
during installation and training). A detailed, final scope of work, including drawings, will
be provided by S & B to the City before installation. At least 40 hours of on-site training
will be provided. All required owner's manuals, CAD-based drawings, and all required
documentation will be provided by S & B.
S&B will also provide two copies of ReachOut software for use by the City to either
remotetly access the GUI at the Corp Yard, or plug into an RTU to download
information, etc. S&B will also provide training to City personnel on the use of this
software.
68
po A 'c
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: June 15, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jack Pittis, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUB,IECT: Contract for sole source supplier of WWTP control software.
Issue: Contract with S&B to provide Graphical User Interface (GUI) and Data Management soft~vare]
for the WWTP making the Treatment Plant Y2K compliant. I
I
Recommendation: Authorize the Ma~'or to sign a contract with S&B in the amount of $19,530. I
Summary: The software that is used to operate the city wastewater treatment plant is not Y2K
compliant. The purchase of operating sot~ware from S&B consistent with the approved sole source
resolution passed on May 4, 1999 will upgrade the software for compliance with Y2K.
Background / Analysis: The City Council approved a Sole Source Resolution at the Council
meeting of May 4, 1999, for S&B to provide sot~ware to bring the WWTP into Y2K compliance.
The Wastewater Division budgeted $25,000 to upgrade the Wastewater Treatment Plant control
software during 1999.
During the discussion on sole source, staff mentioned that the WWTP staff compiled research on
control systems from three companies that provide Graphical User Interface (GUI) and Data
Management System sol, ware. One company (S&B Inc.) was the vendor of the original and current
software used at the WWTP. The other two companies were the only other viable competitors. Staff
found that the S&B product was less expensive and provided significant operational advantages. The
advantages were: 1) being able to keep the current system running and in compliance with the City's
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit during the upgrade process; 2)
having trained staff on the current hardware; and 3) not having to rewrite the Program Logic
Controller (PLC) Code, which would be required in order to utilize different software tcravoid
copyright restrictions for the current software.
Staff'has worked with S&B to develop the necessary scope of the contract which is attached. The
total cost of the purchase is $19,530 which is within our budged amount.
Attachment: Scope of contract
N:~PWKS\WWATER\TREAT~&BPUR.615
69
ATTACHMENT "A"
SCOPE OF WORK FOR PROPOSED CONTRACT
S&B proposes to design and furnish a Graphical computer system to replace the obsolete CVUIO000
system currently in service. S&B will design the system, develop all applications software, furnish and
install an upgraded PLC and the new S&B WinCe® GUI computer.
I. Design Services
A. Design will include the following tasks
1. Prepare design drawings and include new software as required to upgrade the
existing PLC.
2. Develop new applications software for the GUI system. Included are individual
graphic pages for each plant process presently hosted by the PLC. Overview and
set-up pages will bc supplied consistent with S&B GUI standards.
3. Factory test PLC and GUI subsystems
Lump Sum Price $9~010.00
II. Integration Services
A. Purchase components and assemble S&B WinCC GUI 99 computer system per attached
specifications.
B. Install applications software and factory test system.
C. Deliver and install GUI system and field test complete system.
D. Train operators to use system
Lump Sum Price $10~520,00
Work shall be completed within approximately 150 days following a Notice to Proceed. Other terms and
conditions not specified shall be as shown on attached S&B Form 977.
\CONTRACT~PORT ANGELES.SCADA.doc
7O
oeo
Graphic User Interface (GUI) Specification
S&B inc.
PROCESS/ITEM: Graphic User Interface (GUI)
PROCESSOR: Pentium® H, 400 MHZ, PCI bus
Computer Includes:
128 Mb RAM
One 8.4 Gb Hard Disk
CD-Rom, 32xMAX
Zip Drive, 100MB
One 1.44 Mb 3.5" Floppy Drive
One Super VGA, 4Mb Graphics Adapter
RS-232 Serial Communications Port
Parallel Printer Port
10baseT Ethernet network card
PS2 Mouse port and MS mouse
One 101-Key Standard keyboard
Windows NT4.0 Workstation
56k Baud V.90 modem
Manufacturers/Part Numbers:
S&B WinCC® GUI99
MONITOR: 17" Color Monitor
0.26mm dot pitch, 36-70kH~, 1280x1024ni
Manufacturers/Part Numbers:
Dell 1000LS
GUI Software: (Required for each System)
Kit Includes:
WinCC® 4.0 RunTime,
1024k tag Software
ReachOut® Enterprise
Complete Documentation
Mouse Pad
Manufacturers/Part Numbers:
Siemens 6AV65811BE040AX0
PLC Interface: Serial Communication RS232
~s~sc~w~cc ouu.~ 71
72
po A.N.¢ L S
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CiTY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: June 15, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jack Pittis, Director of Public Works and Utilities and Interim City Manager
Stn~ECT: Permission to use landfill for testing of TOPS process
Issue: Lincoln Environmental Solutions has requested that the City approve the use of a portion of
the landfill for the testing of their TOPS process for municipal solid waste reduction. Operation and
use of solid waste for testing purposes is essential for Lincoln Environmental Solutions to obtain the
information necessary to receive state agency approval of the process.
Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement to approve the use of the Port
Angeles Landfill for conducting testing of the TOPS process using municipal solid waste,
subject to review and approval of the agreement by the City Attorney.
Summary_: Lincoln Environmental Solutions desires to use the landfill as a site for testing their
TOPS process so that they can acquire permitting information required by state agencies. Lincoln
Environmental Solutions has indicated that the use of the landfill for testing will not impact landfill
operations. The Utility Advisory Committee has reviewed and recommends approval of the request.
Background / Analysis: The attached letter was received from Steve Sanderson representing
Lincoln Environmental Solutions. They are in the process of conducting research and development
ora process to reduce municipal solid waste to carbon dioxide gas, ash and metal and glass fractions.
A key part of their research and development involves permit approval of state and local agencies
such as Department of Ecology, Olympic Ak Pollution Control Authority and Clallam County Health
Department. The permit process requires that TOPS be able to provide information that can only be
gained through operation of the process and testing. Lincoln Environmental Solutions is requesting
that the City approve the landfill as a site to conduct testing. It is anticipated that the agreement
would contain requirements about the following:
· A specific location will be approved at the landfill that will not adversely impact landfill
operations (time of use is about 3 to 4 months)
Lincoln Environmental Solutions will be responsible for all permitting requirements
Lincoln Environmental Solutions will indemnify and hold the City harmless and carry
insurance to the satisfaction of our Human Resources Manager
· We understand that the TOPS process is a self contained unit not requiring any utility services
· Escape clause allowing the City to terminate agreement on short notice
Attachment: Letter
N APWKS~W ASTE~LANDFILL\TESTS\TOPS. WPD 73
con
N
EL Iv 0NM : r^t LUTIONS
_ Rec ,ch'ng by' Reduction. May 7, 1999
e~,,~.~_~_rate oJJ~ce: Port A'~_es City Council, Utilities Advisory Committee
4130
Turmcater
_~1 E. 5th Street
Prude Route
Pon Angeles, WA. 98.~6~
Port Angeles
~bington 98363 RE: Testing of TOPS at City Landfill
Office:
Dear Utilities Advisory Committee Members.
(3607 417 ~4884,-
Fax: Will Possinger and I are very. interested in the possibility of utilizing the City
(360) 417.3844 Landfill fbr the on-site testing of the Thermal Oxidation Process Systems (TOPS)
Toll-Free: solid waste disposal unit. We are in the early stages of the permit application process
with the Olympic Air Pollution Control Authority, Department of Ecology, County
(877? 4133884
Department of Health, etc. A key to the permit process is where that testing will be
e-m,~z, conducted~ and the possible impact on the surrounding area.
Iincoln~o~Tpen.com
The landfill would be ideal for myriad reasons. Not the least of which is
zoning: from which all other considerations stem.
Attached is the Proposal submitted to the Solid Waste Advisory. Committee
last month. It outlines what Lincoln Environmental Solutions, Inc. (formerly EnEco)
,~,~ould like to do on the Olympic Peninsula. Also attached are emission control data
and some of the practical considerations for incorporating TOPS into a Regional
Comprehensive Solid Waste Plan. We believe it provides the most cost effective
means of privatizing MSW disposal through the Best Available Control Technology
(BACT) application required by State and Federal regulations.
We would like the opportunty to prove that this approach provides a win-
win-win scenario: It protects the environment: creates a wide variety of family-wage
jobs: and cuts rates paid by citizens. It does not adversely impact on the ability of the
City of Port Angeles to pay-offthe costs of the landfill. We would like to show how
the life of the landfill could be prolonged and the rates increased for other uses.
As our name implies, we want to help provide solutions; both environmental
and economic. We welcome the chance to discuss our Reduction by Recycling
theory with you at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
,
Marketing Director
cc: Jack Pittis, City Manager/Director, Public Works
74
April 5, 1999
Mr. Joe Ciarlo
Chairman, Solid Waste Advisory Committee
Clallam County Courthouse
Port Angeles, WA. 98362
RE: Letter of Intent; Proposal for TOPS
Disposal of Municipal Solid Waste
Lincoln Environment Solutions, Inc. is prepared to negotiate for the right to dispose
of the Municipal Solid Waste collected in Sequim and the Dungeness Valley. That
position is based on the conversation we had in February with you and Bob Martin, and
subsequent dialogues with other participants in the MSW collection/disposal business.
Will and Brian Possinger, Lincoln Industrial Corp, Directors of Manufac-
turing and Special Projects, and Steve Sanderson, Marketing Director will provide
quality control of the equipment and timely response to any needs by Sequim or Clallam
County. The manufacture of TOPS on the Olympic Peninsula will also result in the
addition of upwards of 30 FTE jobs in the family-wage pay scale in the next two-to-three
years. That does not include a significant number of field representatives anticipated for
the installation and maintenance of the equipment upon delivery.
Lincoln Environmental Solutions, Inc. can assure the Olympic Peninsula of clean,
environmentally acceptable emission levels. We have been in contact with the Olympic
Air Pollution Control Authority and the Department o£Ecology and will be work very
closely with those agencies throughout the Notice of Construction (NOC) Application
process. The results of TOPS operations to date provide a Best Available Control
Technology (BACT) baseline that assures furore compliance with emission standards.
DOE representatives have gone so far as to point out, based on BACT data, that
"Regulations won't kill your project". They were, in fact, very enthusiastic and down-
right encouraging. They did warn about the need for community acceptance and under-
standing of the Oxidation process, as opposed to "Burning" or "Incineration".
We have claimed to be able to provide a disposal solution that is also
economically beneficial to the Olympic Peninsula. That to end, we propose a Tipping
Fee in the amount of $58.00 per ton for the first two years. That is for a guaranteed
amount of Municipal Solid Waste of not less than 40 tons per day per week; a week
consisting of not less than five days. EnEco Systems, Inc. will guarantee that it will
maintain the capability of processing up to 80 tons of MSW per day. After the first two
years of operation the Tipping Fees will be reduced to $55 per ton. After an additional
three years Lincoln Environmental Solutions, Inc. will offer to sell the TOPS to either
the City of Sequim or Clallam County.
75
Page 2 - TOPS Proposal
For it's part, Lincoln Environmental Solutions, Incl would like the following
assurances:
- Assurance that flow control of MSW for the Sequim/Dungeness Valley will not
fail below 40 tons per day for the population of 25,000 +/-. An average 5 pounds/
person/day, conservative by national (6.1 lbs) standards, equals 62.5 tons per day.
- A lease of the Blue Mountain Transfer Station property for 20 years at $1.00
per year. Lincoln Environmental Solutions, Inc. will convey all claims to real or
personal property improvements upon sale of the property or at the end of 20
years.
Lincoln Environmental Solutions, Inc. is a private, for-profit business group. We
would like to take-on the privatization of the MSW disposal needs of the Olympic
Peninsula in it's entirety. We see this proposal as a first step. We very much want to work
hand-in-hand with the efforts of the Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) to
establish a disposal/collection district with inter-local agreements that may assist in:
1) Protecting the environment of the Olympic Peninsula
2) Enhancing services to the community
3) Sustaining the rates paid by citizens
We do not see those objectives as mutually exclusive. We believe that unlike any
other options available to the Olympic Peninsula, TOPS can make all 'those elements
happen while actually complimenting the other.
Let us know how we might be of assistance. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Will Possinger Steve Sanderson
Director of Manufacturing Marketing Director
cc: Jim Bay, Manager, Sequim Public Works Department
Jack Pittis, Manager, Port Angeles Public Works Department
Bob Martin, Director, Department of Community Development
Clallam County Commissioners
76
~OPS for all types of solid and liquid wastes generated by small commullitieS, or large commercial facilities (i.e., manufacturing
s, shopping cenLr~, hospitals, airports, ports, military bases, mining/for~try/oil camps). TOPS requires no daily operator.
: oPS offers 90% volume reduction, recovery of all glass, aluminum and metals. TOPS may be configured to deliver hot water
~md air conditioning or heating, saving on electricity. Both liquid and solid wastes may be processed in one syste~
G~GE T~UC~ CREATE MORE, EIV~SSIONS T~MN TOPS
]?he environmental cos~ ~s~at~ wi~ ~c~g ~icul~ & ~id e~sions & non-~newable energy ~gc) .~ ,
md l~dfilling (rotc g~ a so~/water l~g) have o~n ~n accept~ ~use of ~e ~r~p~on ~at
~ey ~e l~s h~l 'th~ the~ options. The e~or ~ ~s lo~c is ~at r~ch h~ ~tly improv~ .~':..:~. ::
fie tec~ology of o~dafion ~ ~at it is now f~ more ~-
5ul to u~ ~cl~ ~d md~s ~ it is to ~ TOP~. ~"
Di~l T~ Pollution ~S E~ ~i~ ~m~iom
Source ~] Panicu~s
T~ck ~ Lg ~ 0.218
O~a~er '~ N/~ ] 0.050 N/A ] 0.0~4
SpeedOfT~c~ =~ (55~-~
O~d~er S~ = ~0 ~/~r (5~ ~r) Was~ ~p~s 0 - fi), ~o Sc~bar
MIA = No~ ~pplicab~e BDL = ~1o~ ~c~ble
Dc~ky NOx = 0.11~2 ]~ NO~ pp~Ox = IH ~ ~/1,297
~k7 SO= = 0.166 l~c~ ppmSO3 = 005
~vir~an~ Probi~ need ~COnomi~ ~iu~ons
Product Profile: TOPS Model 2 Dual-Linked
with Liquid Waste Destructor
Why did the U.S. Navy choose TOPS?
1) No operator required.
As one observes ~h¢ dcsign, thc first feature that stands out are the
large (9'x9') top doors. TOPS may be directly loaded by collecl/on
vehicles with loads of up to 700 cubic feet! The U.S. Navy immedi-
.ately recognized thc benefits and daily cost savings they would enjoy
by eliminating the need for an operator. With TOPS, simply push a
button and walk away.
2) Environmental Stewardship, 90% Volume Reduction and
Energy Recovery.
- Easy recovery of glass and metal ~er the process.
- significant volume reduction: up to 95%
- convert organics to clean heat energy
3) Guaranteed performance and no scrubber required.
Due to thc unique batch load design, TOPS delivers a clean stack
emission - guaxantecd. Incinerators that axe loaded on a continuous
basis will generate high Itvels of particulate and may be accidentally
or wilfully overloaded causing smoke. TOPS, with its batch load de-
sign and Iow operating temperatures, ensures particulates are not
generated and no heavy metals ase ever r¢lr. ased from the stack.
Unless high concentrations of sulphur or chlorine are present, TOPS
does not require a grubber.
Customer Profile
Purchased by: U.S. Navy,
Nuclear Defence Agency.
Location: Johnston Is.
Requirement: 20 ton/day
ENEco SYSTEMS INC.
8 Head Office: ~.404 - 999 Canada Place, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 3E2
Fax: (604) 649-3480 Telephone: (604) 649-4518
Figure
PROPOSAL FOR TOPS Model 3, Quad-Linked, Automatic Ash Removal: September, 1998
80 Page5
EnEco Systems, Incorporated
113 South Eunice, Port Angeles, WA. 98362
(360) 417-9558/9559 (360)417-9560 FAX
ENvironmental problems need
ECOnomical solutions
Thermal Oxidation Process Systems provide a clean, energy
efficient means of disposing of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). It saves in
the cost of transporting waste materials and produces steam for heating, air
conditioning or electricity, dePending on the size of the System.
TOPS uses oxygen starved gasificati6n of fuel sources; MSW,
Industrial or Commercial.Waste. It is NOT incineration or burning. It
reduces the fuel sources to a neutral fly ash that comprises about Five
Percent of the original volume. It is, literally, recycling by reduction.
Metals and glass are removed after the oxidation cycIe. The remaining
ash can be used in aggregate for c6nstruction material or put into a landfill;
whose cleaner, more useful life can extended for many years.
The byproduct of TOPS is Carbon Dioxide, the smffplants need to
survive and who, in mm, help us survive. The emissions are significantly
below EPA standards.
EnEco Systems wants to market and manufacture TOPS in Port
Angeles. The future customers, like the Olympic Peninsula, are rural,
environmentally sensitive communities around the world.
The cost for disposing of MSW would likely go down after debt
reduction in two or three years. Privatization by EnEco would not impact on
any existing jobs in waste management and will create between 20-and-30
new family supporting jobs within five years.
TOPS represents one of those rare win-win-win scenarios. Involving
the environment, the community and their citizens.
Will Possinger Steve Sanderson
Director of Manufacturing Marketing Director
SUMMARY
The following table presents the triplicate or quadruplicate test averages for the listed
parameters from Eneco's Johnston Atoll oxidizer stack on January 30 and 31, 1997.
PARAM~R CONTAMINANT RESULTS -EMISSION LIMITS
Particulate (mg/dscm) 22.5 N/A
Particulate (lb/hr of PM~0) < 0.09 1.72
SO,. (mg/dscm) 76.3 N/A
SO: (lb/hr) 0.31 1.62
NOx (mg/dscm) as NO2 109 N/A
NO., (lb/hr) as NO2 ' 0.45 1.58
CO (mg/dscm) 3.4 N/A
CO (lb/hr) 0.014 0.15
Flowrate (dscm/min) 31.4 -
< = Less than .'
Concentrations and flowrates are expressed at standard conditions of 20°C
and 101.3 KPa (dry)
po A.N.¢ L S
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: June 15, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Don Madison, Property Manager
SUBJECT: Lease agreement between City of Port Angeles and Joseph Baron
Issue: Should the City renew the lease with Joseph Baron on approximately 160 acres, located
seven miles south of Hwy 101 on Deer Park Road?
Recommendation: The Real Estate Committee and City Staff recommend that the City
Council authorize Mayor Braun to sign the renewal of the lease agreement on behalf of the
City of Port Angeles.
Summary_: This is a lease agreement with Joe Baron, wherein he agrees to watch over approximately
160 acres of the City's property up Deer Park Road in exchange for $480.00 per year plus leasehold
tax of $61.63. The lease is from Jan. 1, 1999 to December 31, 2000.
Background / Analysis: M_r Baron has leased property on Deer Park Road from the City since April
1989. This lease renewal request is an extension of that agreement with an increase in the rental
amount. The property is approximately 160 acres of undeveloped pasture land which is a portion of
the former firing range used by the Navy within the Morris Creek Watershed. The lease term is from
January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2000 and Mr. Baron has agreed to:
1. Hold the City harmless in the unlikely event of injury.
2. Keep the property posted and maintain the fences.
3. Only use the property for grazing of his cattle.
4. Increase the rental amount from $240.00 per year to $480.00 per year.
Attachment: Map of property
O:'~XCHANGEkCNCLPKT~PUBWKS'~BARONLSE. WPD
I
4'
LEGAL ' DESCRIPTION: · G~_
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: June 15, 1999
To: 1VIAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Don Madison, Property Manager ,
SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Close Out of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Phase III General Purpose Grant
Issue: Should the City close out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Phase III?
Recommendation: City Staff and Community Action (sub contractor) recommend that the
City Close ~ut P'-"~ase III of the Community Development Block Grant and that the City
Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Grantee Performance Close-Out Report.
Summary_: The City expended the entire $750,000 budget for phase III in December 1998. The
purpose of the public hearing is to provide the public an opportunity to express their opinion on the
success or failure of the program.
Background / Analysis: The public heating is the last step in the close out of this phase of the
Community Development Block Grant. The public heating is part of the formal close out activities
required by the Community Development Block Grant Program. Attached is additional information
regarding this phase of the program from Community Action.
Attachments: Background information from Community Action
G:XEXCHANOE\CNCLPKT~PUBWKS\CDB{3-PH3.WPD
85
For Public Hearing on Close Out for Phase III
Port Angeles Housing Rehabilitation Program
Phase III of thc Port Angeles Housing Rehabilitation Program has been a great success by all measures. 60
household representing 132 individuals received help. 28 home repair loans were processed; 40 emergency health
and safety repairs were completed; and 16 bo~dicap accessibility projects done.
A very interesting aspect of the current phase is the number of indivich_~_~!s with disabilities who applied for and
received help. During the current phase, 36 of the individuals who received help indicated they were disabled. In
Phas~ I, 12 indicated this, while 14 indicated this in Phase II. This is a substantial increase.
The direct result has been many home repairs for this group. Repairs inchided everything from complete
foundations and roofs, to plumbing and electrical repairs, replacement of broken windows and sewer lines, and
repair of soil floors. These repairs helped home owners with repairs they were physically and financially incapable
of completing.
In addition to the emergency health and safety repairs, 16 projects focused on accessibility modification. I would
like to share a few pictures of these projects with you.
On the first, the home owner only wanted hand rails on the front porch.
This project consisted of levered handles on doors and faucets, hand rails and grab bars and moving the laundlT
facihties from the basement to the main floor of the home, allowing greater independence for the home owner.
Here, loan repayment funds were utilized with volunteer labor to build a wheel chair ramp for a grandmother
raising two grandchildren.
Here, we combined with USDA Rural Economic Development to build porches and steps with adequate rails. The
steps have a four inch rise to allow easier access. These are preferable where a wheel chair is not needed nor likely
to be needed in the near future.
Here, a project which started as a heating emergency when an old oil furnace failed, ended with a new electrical
panel upstairs to support a smaller forced air electric furnace. By moving the electrical panel upstairs, the home
owner was able to reset her own breakers. She has called several times since, grateful that this aspect has helped
her so much. While the intent was primarily emergency health and safety repairs, the result was greater
accessibility.
Our largest two projects involved widening hall ways, handicap accessible bathrooms including accessible showers,
toilets and sinks and ramps, as well as lighted switches for room lights. Here pictures show removing walls,
expanded bathroom size, widened doors with levered handles. These allowed a wheel chair bound MS patient to
live in greater independence in her home with her family.
86
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: June 15, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jack Pittis, Director &Public Works
SUB. CT: Hold a public hearing on the Final Assessment Roll for the Upper Golf Course Road Sewer
ULID#215 and consider ordinances to approve the final assessments and connection charges.
Issue: Hold a public hearing for the Final Assessment Roll on the Upper Golf Course Sewer ULID#215 and
consider adoption of an ordinance confirming the final assessments for ULID#215 and consider adoption of a
separate ordinance to establish a connection charge for those outside of ULID#215 that might connect to the
sewers constructed by ULID#215.
Recommendation: Open Public Hearing and take written and verbal testimony regarding the final
assessment roll and:
1) Make any adjustments to the final assessment roll and approve the roil,
2) Adopt the ordinance confirming the final assessments for ULID#21$, and
3) Adopt the ordinance establishing a connection charge for those outside of ULID# 215 that may
connect to the sewers constructed as a part of ULID#215.
Background/Analysis: The properties covered in this U-LID were annexed into the City to allow for the extension
of city sewers since many &the septic systems serving existing homes had failed or were failing. Ultimately the
benefit of city sewers to the properties can be evaluated by comparing the cost of alternative sewer disposal
provided by onsite septic systems that cost approximately $5,500 to $15,000 (see letter dated May 19, 1999 to
property owners). The final assessment roll, including updated ownership and address information, has been
prepared based on the future connection ordinance and is on file with the City Clerk. Hearing notices have been
mailed to all property owners within the ULID#215 area and notices of the hearing were published in the local
newspaper. Copies of the Final Assessment Roll, Letter to Property Owners, and Notice of Hearing are attached.
At this final assessment hearing the City Council will consider written and verbal property owner objections. (See
attachment from bond counsel explaining the Assessment Roll Heating Process.) A_~er considering the public
comments, the City Council should finalize the final assessment roll. In considering the comments, Council can
consider whether or not the property owner has received the benefit of the sewer construction. Written objections
received by the City Clerk are attached and those received after mailing of the agenda packet will be distributed
at the heating. A copy of a letter sent to all property owners dated September 23, 1996 is attached. This letter
contains a detailed explanation of how the City Engineer developed the method of assessment and what other
factors, such as wetlands, easements, tight of way were considered.
If the City Council's actions at the hearing will increase assessments, a new hearing must be held to consider the
changes made in the roll. Following the City Council's approval of the final assessment roll an ordinance
confirming the assessment roll must be approved. At~er roll approval, notices will be published and letters will be
sent to each property owner informing them that the assessment roll has been filed for collection. 8 7
Mayor Braun and City Council
ULID #2 ! 5 Final Assessment Hearing
Sune 15, ! 999
Page - 2
The connection charge ordinance which is attached was prepared to assist in lowering the final assessments for
ULID~215. This ordinance provides for a charge to property owners outside of ULID#215 that might connect to
the sewer system constructed by ULID#215. The connection charge is equal to the ULID#215 per'connection
assessment.
Attachment: A. Notice of Hearing
B. Letter to Property Owners, May 19,1999
C. Final Assessment Roll & Map of Area
D. The Assessment Roll Heating (from bond counsel)
E. Letter to Property Owners, Sept. 23, 1996
F. Written Objections
G. County Assessor Farm/Agricultural Land Certification
H. ULID#215 Final Assessment Roll Ordinance
I. Connection Charge Ordinance
NSPROJECTSLO5-05LID~a,S SESS~HRNG1 .WPD
88
CITY OF PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON
NOTICE OF HEARING ON FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 215
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District
No. 215, established for the purpose of constructing sewer improvements as ordered by Ordinance
No. 2939 of the City of Port Angeles, Washington (the "City"), has been prepared as required by law
and is on file and open to inspection at the office of the City Clerk at City Hall, 321 East Fifth Street,
Port Angeles, Washington.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the City Council of thc City has fixed the time for the
heating upon the final assessment roll for 7:00 p.m., local time, on June 15, 1999, in the City
Council Chambers, City Hall, 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles,. Washington.
Any person desiring to object to any assessment appearing on the final assessment roll for
the District is notified to make all objections in writing and to file them with the City Clerk on or
-before the date fixed for the hearing on the final assessment roll or at the hearing itself. All
objections must state clearly the grounds of the objections and should contain lot, block and addition,
section, tax number or other identifying description of the property.
At the time and place fixed, and at such times to which the hearing may be adjourned, the
City Council will sit as a board of equalization for the purpose of considering.objections duly filed,
togetherwith all information and evidence in support of those objections, and for the purpose of
considering such assessment roll. At the hearing, or adjournment thereof, the City Council may
correct, revise, raise, lower, change or modify the roll or any part thereof, or set aside the roll and
order a new assessment. Following the hearing, the City Council Will confirm the assessment roll
by ordinance. When property has been entered originally upon the roll, and the assessment thereon
is not raised, no objection shall be considered by the City Council or by any court on appeal unless
the objection is made in writing at or prior to the date fixed for the original hearing upon the roll.
Dated the 18th day of May, 1999.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON
Becky J. Upton, CMC
City Clerk
Publish: May 23 and May 30~ 1999 A
' ORT'Al NGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
· ..- Dear Property Owner:
: Enclosed is the notice of hearing and the final assessment roll for the Upper Golf Course
'iii Road Sewer Local Improvement District (LID) No. 215. Please read the notice carefully
-"~ - and, if you have objections, follow the procedures outlined in the notice.
~.:?... : The final preliminary assessment roll was based upon the final costs for the project.
.~'./:: ... Regretfully. the final cost for the LID increased significantly from the preliminary estimated
ii:.: .'... cost. The major factors which added to the coSt of this project were: 1 ) Costs used for the
- formation of the. LID are typically based upon'preliminary information and not a final
- '~ -~ detailed design; 2) The fall/winter construction schedule resulted in increased bid prices
and construction quantities exceeded those in the bid due to 'the soil/water conditions
- .. compounded by winter weather.
" The preliminary assessment for each equivalent service connection (ESC) was $4,765.58
and the final ESC assessment would have been' $11,362.17 without reduction measures.
~ The City Council supported reduction of the assessment through establishment of a
connection charge ordinance to collect Sewer connection charges from future connections
Outside of,the LID area. This reduced the ESC assessment from $11,362.17 to $7,101.36
which is consistent with the cost of septic drain fields in the area which can run from
$5,500 to $15,000 or more depending on soil/water conditions.
The total assessment set forth on the enclosed final assessment roll is the amount that will
be assessed against the property identified by the tax number. This amount i{ the adjusted
proportionate share of the cost of LID constructed improvements to be born by the
property.
If there has been a change in ownership, or if this notice is received by a contract
purchaser or mortgagee, please forward a copy of this notice to the owner.
If you have any questions, please call me at (360) 417-4803.
Sincerely,
City Engineer
Encl.:Notice and Final Assessment Roll
Loc.: n:~projects~-~-05~rnemos~hea dng2.wpd
File: 95-05.10
321 EAST FIFTH STREET ® P. O. BOX $ 1.50 ® PORT ANGELES, WA 98362-0217
PHONE: 360-417-4805 ® FAX: 360-417-4542 · TTY: 360-417-4645
90 E-MAIL: pU SWO RKS@CI. PORT-ANG ELES.WA. US
J~e 4, ~ FINAL ASSESMENT ROLL
Upper Golf Course Road Sewer ULID # 215
Parcel Name & Tax Equivalent Total Estimated ~ 6.5% for 10 Years
Number Address Number Servic~ Assesment ANNUAL TOTAL
Connections AMOUNT AMOUNT
I James R. / Teny L. McDonald 063014 110000 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
P.O. Box 1450
Port Angeles, WA
98362
2 James R. / Terry L. McDonald 063014 i 10030 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
~.O. Box 1450
Port Angles, WA
98362
3 Richard O. Hcndrickson 063014 110150 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1826 Melody Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
...
4 Richard G. Hendrickson 063014 110130 I $7,101.36 :'~.~i,. $987.83 $9,878.32
1826 Melody Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
5 Doris B. Taggart [}63014 110080 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1830 Melody Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
6 William E. Barker III 963014 110140 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.39'
1834 Melody Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
7 Larry D. Racine ~063014 110070 1 $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1838 Melody Ln.
Port Angeles, WA
98362
8 vlcL~nnan Trust, Neva Marie 063014 110060 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1842 Melody Ln
Pon Angeles; WA
98362
9 Terry G. McDonald 063014 110110 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
920 GolfCours~ Rd
Pon Angclcs, WA
98362
10' Terry G. McDonald 063014 110120 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
920 GolfCours~ Rd
Port Angeles, WA
98362
ll Gary A~ Lappicr 063014 110090 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
924 GolfCours~ Rd
Port Angeles, WA
98362 i
EXHIBIT A (l/S) 91
Parcel Name & Tax Equivalent Total Estimated {~ 6.5% for 10 Years
Number Address Number Serv{~ Asseament ANNUAL TOTAL
Connections AMOUNT AMOUNT
12 City of Port Angeles 063014 1401 l0 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
321 E. Fifth St.
Port Ansclcs, WA
98362
13 Grant J. Munro 063014 149050 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1765 E. Woodhaven Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
14 Elmer ?. Krogue 063014 140130 4 $28,4C~.44 $3,9~1.:~L3 $39,513.~0
463 Lupine Way
Vcntura, CA
93001
15 Brian Jones 063014 149060 I $7,10i.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
425 R~ Rock Dr.
Wadsworth, OH
44281-2208
16 Olive T. Grimes 063014 149070 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1753 Woodhavcn Ln.
Port Angeles, WA
98362 ~
17 Grant J. Munro 063014 149080 ! $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1765 E. Woodhaven Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
18 Mary A. Neske 063014 140030 10 $71,013.60 $9,878.32 $98,783.25
1120 S. Golf Course Rd 1000
Port Angeles, WA
98362 -.
19 David B. Bork 063014 149010 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1216 S. OolfGourse Rd
Port Angeles. WA
98362
20 Rogers Family Trust ~)63014 149020 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1837 E. Woodhaven Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
21 E.W. & Susan L. McK/nney ~)63014 149150 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
823 E. Woodhawn Ln.
Port Angclcs, WA
98362
22 David H. Hagiwara 363014 149180 I $7,101.~ $987.83 $9,878~32
.809 Woodhav~n Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
C?
9 2 EXHIBIT
Parcel Name & Tax Equivai~t Total Estimated Q 6.5% for 10 Years
Number Address Number Servic~ Asseament ANNUAL TOTAL
Connections AMOUNT AMOUNT
23 Kenneth/April SP~r ' ' 063014 149090 ! $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.112
P.O. Box 524
Port Angeles, WA
98362
24 Dean M. Re, ed 063014 149100 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.112
1727 E, Woodhaven Ln.
Peri Angeles, WA
98362
25 Darrell Peterscn 063014 149110 I $7,101.36 $9(t7.83 $9,878.32
1036 E. I st St
Port Angeles, WA
98362
26 D~nnis Michael Nathan 063014 149120 1 $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
Etal Jr.
1712 E. Woodhaven Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
27 Dean A. / Carleen T. BenS°n 063014 149130 3 $21,304.08 $2,963.50 $29,604.97
1830 E. Woodhaven Ln.
Port Angeles, WA
98362
28 Linda A. Wilcox 063014 149140 2 $1'4,202.72 $1,975.66 $19,756.66
1720 E. Woodhaven Ln.
Port Angeles, WA
98362
.- 29 Richard G. Bradley ~)63014 149170 I $7,101.36 $987~83 $9,878.32
1806 Nancy Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
30 Dean A. / Carlecn T. Bcnson ~63014 149160 1 $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1830 E. Woodhavea Ln.
Port Angeles, WA
98362
31 Richard A. Foster 063014 149040 2 $14,202.72 $1,975.66 $19,756.65
73 Island View Rd
Port Angeles, WA
98362
32 Mr. George E. Grief 063014 149030 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1845 E. Woodhaven Ln.
Port Angeles, WA
98362
EXHIBIT A {31{;) 93
'~T ............
Pam~l Name & J Tax ' Equivalent Total Eslimatad Q 6.5% fur 10 Yeall
~lumbcr Address Number Servi~ Assesnmnt ANNUAL TOTAL
Connections AMOUNT AMOUNT
33 Richard/Karen Brown 063013 230190 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,87~.32 ,~
131 ! S. GoffCourse Rd.
Port Angeles, WA
98362
- 3.4 Fritz Conzad 063013 239010 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
119;21 E. Maddock Rd
Port Angeles, WA
98362
35 ..ancc 1~1. Ruddick 063013 239020 I $7, i01.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1937 E. Maddock Rd.
Port Angeles, WA
98362.
36 tvtontc W. / l..xslic English 363013 230260 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
2007 E.Maddock Rd.
Port Angeles, WA
98362
37 Dorth¥ Schmuck 063013 230110 ? $49,709.52 $6,914.83 $69,148.27
t0.7 Mt. Ple~nt Rd
Port Angeles, WA
98362
38 Michael Ron'c I063013 230090 7 $49,709.52 $6,914.83 $69,148.27
P.O. Box 172'7
Santa Monica, CA
39 H.H. Heerschap 063013 230030 9 $63,912.24 $8,890.49 $88,904.92
3?;242 4;2nd Ave. $. (W'LY 615' +/.
Auburn, WA
98OO1 .r
TOTAL AMOUNTS ' 75 ~;532,602'00 i $74,087'44 $740.874.36
Dir~tor~-~u blic~V~ks- Date ~/City Treasurer ~~/,,,
94 EXHIBIT A (415)
· ,o ...I.D. BOUNDARY
®
L]ND~ER6 RI3,
?
eueuc ~s ~~~ L.I.D. 21S MAP
~ ~' 25o EXHIBIT A (515)
The Assessment Roll Hearing Process
(provided by bond counsel David Thompson)
At, er construction is completed, the final assessment roll is prepared and notice of a
hearing on the assessment roll is given to all owners of property within the LID and is published.
The purpose of the assessment roll hearing is to hear from individual property owners
regarding their individual assessments. Pursuant to state law, only those property owners that
have filed written objections at or prior to the heating are allowed to speak at the heating. The
matters at issue in the formation stage of an LID are not appropriate for testimony at the
assessment roll hearing, i.e. the improvements to be constructed, what property should be
included in the LID, and whether it is appropriate to form an LID to finance the improvements.
At the hearing on the assessment roll, property owners must limit their testimony to (1)
whether their property's benefit from the improvements is at least as high as the assessment on
their property and (2) whether their assessment is proportional to the assessments on other
property in the LID.
After all property owners who have filed written objections are allowed to testify, the
Council may confirm the assessment roll as proposed or may raise or lower one or more
assessments. If any assessment is raised or if the Council would like to reallocate assessments,
property owners must be given a new notice and a new hearing must be held on the revised
amount.
After the assessment roll is confirmed, the property owners will be given notice that they
may pay assessments within 30 days in a lump sum without interest or may pay them in up to 10
annual installments with interest. After it is determined what assessments will be paid over time,
the City will issue bonds and will use the assessment paid over time to repay the bonds. The bond
proceeds will be used to pay all final costs of the improvements, repay the interim financing, and
pay the costs of issuing the bonds.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
321 East Fifth Street. PO Box 1150 Phone ~360) 417--~805 TTY Phone ~360~ 417~645
PUBLIC WORKS Pon Angeles. Washington 98362-1150 Fax ~360} 417-A.609 e-mail papwdept(~ olympus.net
September 23, 1996
RE: Local Improvement District L.I.D. No. 215, Upper Golf Course Road; Hearing &
Formation
Dear Property Owner/Resident:
At their meeting of September 17, 1996 City Council received testimony regarding the
formation of referenced L.I.D.. Wdtten and phone comments received regarding the L.I.D.
were also discussed. Regarding the sewer portion of the L.I.D., several landowners east
of Lindberg Road stated that their assessment for the sewer was excessive and would
prefer to be removed from the L.I.D.. Another landowner in this area along with two
landowners west of Golf Course Road questioned the basis for developing the sewer
assessment for larger parcels. In view of the comments and changes to the resolution of
adoption, Council continued the public hearing to October 1, 1996. Additional testimony
will be taken at that hearing.
Adjustments of the easterly L.I.D. boundary were discussed as solutions to those
preferring to be removed from the L.I.D.. The boundary adjustments that are being
considered by City Council in view of the testimony and the potential impacts to your
assessment are enclosed for your information.
The development of the sewer assessment method involved several steps. During the
preliminary engineering for the LoI.D. we reviewed several sewer assessment methods
(Lot/parcel areas, zone & termini, lot frontage, and number of equivalent service
connections) and the equivalent service connection method appeared to be the most
equitable. Each parcel was then reviewed in regards to zoning, existing use, and potential
for subdivision. Those parcels without potential for subdivision were assigned one
equivalent service connection. The remaining parcels with a potential for future subdivision
were reviewed taking into account existing easements, future road dedications,
topography, wetlands, and other factors which would impact the potential number of future
parcels and equivalent services. These areas were then removed from the total parcel
area leaving a net land area for potential development. This remaining net area was then
divided by 15,000 S.F. per lot and rounding down to determine the number of equivalent
service connections. The 15,000 S.F. per lot was developed using 10,000 S.F. average
area per lot (The existing RS-9 zoning permits 9,000 S.F.) with a 2/3 maximum yield.
Testimony was also received regarding the road improvements for Melody Lane. Following
the informal balloting last summer there appeared to be sufficient support for the road
improvements to Melody Lane. At the hearing the cost and benefits of the road
improvements were questioned by two landowners on the south side of Melody Lane who 9 7
desired to not be included in this portion of the L.I.D.. This added opposition reduced the
support for the Melody Lane road improvement portion of the L.I.D. to 44.28% based on
assessed improvements. I will be recommending to the City Council that the Melody Lane
road improvements no longer be included in the L.I.D. formation due to lack of support.
The revised L.I.D. boundary reflecting the removal of the Melody Lane road improvements
and revised assessments for sewer only, is enclosed. Additional testimony regarding the
road improvements will also be taken at the continued public hearing for the L.I.D. during
the City Council meeting of October 1, 1996.
Following the public hearing, City Council will review the boundary and improvement
alternates for the L.I.D.. Once the L.I.D. is approved, preparation of contact documents can
proceed with anticipation of construction in 1997.
Please remember that your actual assessment will be based on the final design,
construction, and administrative costs directly associated with the L.I.D..
If you have questions please call Mr. Jim Mahlum or I at (360) 417-4805. Should you have
added testimony please attend the public hearing on October 1, 1996, 7:00 p.m. at City
Hall.
Very truly yours,
worthy P.E.
City Engineer
GWK:gk
Copies: J. Pittis, Dir.
Di~: C:XztataV,~p~lid~a05~flmgl a.gwk
File: 95-05.02
Jack Plltls, Director Ken Ridout, Deputy Direl:=~ Gary Kenworthy, City Engine~
Pl~ti~ Rasler, Administrative Assistant Tim Smith, Contracts Administrat~ Dale Warner, Street Supefinteflcteflt
~.~ ~ Bob Jo.., S~d W.m S~m.~.~.~ R,~p~ E,,~,~, w~.~ s.~..m.m P.m ~, E.~. ~ s~.
Lou Haehnlen, Sr. Building Inspector
City of Port Angeles ~l 'f 1990
Betty J. Upton, City Clerk
P O Box 1150 .~:. ClT~ OF PORT ANGELES
CITY CLERK
Port Angeles, WA 98362 June 2, 1999
Re: LID 215 Upper Golf Course Sanitary Sewers
Parcel # 34 Fritz Conrad 1921 E. Maddock Rd
Tax # 063013 239010
Certainly I would like to place on record my objection to what seems to be
exorbitant charges in regards this LID. Nor do I agree with some of the statements made
in the letter of May 19 by Gary Kensworthy, City Engineer.
The original estimates of Sept 25, 1996 were $4804.00
That was later changed to $4765.58.
Letter from JeffPomerantz of October 8, 1997 states: "The city is committed to
the timely construction of this project and the staff and City Council will evaluate the final
costs after construction. That evaluation will involve the honoring of our original estimate
within a reasonable range of cost increase. We will be recommending that the wastewater
utility invest in a portion of the overran etc
Letter from Jack Pittas of October 8, 1997 stated that the construction bid was
significantly higher than the original estimate. (No figures given---what would be
significant ...... I would expect 10 to 15 % to be significant)
Letter from Gary Kensworthy of May 19, 1999 stated that the final assessment
without adjustments would have been $11362.17 (A whopping 138% increase) Even
after the "reduction measures" the final of $7101.36 is 50% above estimated assessment.
I do not agree with the statement that the "winter weather" played a big factor in
this increase. This was one of the mildest winters on record, and in watching the work
progress, there were very little weather related problems. Besides the bid by RV assoc.
was made on the premise of normal winter weather, and the city engineering staff had
stated in one of the preliminary letters that work may have to be recessed if the weather
proved to be detrimental and that construction may not be finished until summer of 1998.
This did not occur ..... The only really inclement weather encountered was during the
phase of construction between Woodhaven Drive and Melody Lane, and assuredly,, that
was not an easy route, but probably should have been (and probably was) expected during
the bidding process.
With probably the smallest parcel in the group it appears our costs of $7101,36 plus the
city hookup fee of $642.00 and the connection stub fee of $1621.00 for a total of
$9364.36 is far above the anticipated assessment. Perhaps part of this problem was with
the contractor involved ..... They quoted me a figure for hookup of $2980.00 which
would have been an 84% overcharge over the local contractors final charge of $1621.00
Respectfully
Fritz Conrad
99
May 24, 1999 [~A¥ 2 6 1~39
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY CLERK
Port Angeles City Council
c/o Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
City of Port Angeles
321 East Fifth St.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Dear City Council:
This is in response to the letter dated May 19, 1999 and attached "Notice of Hearing and
the Final Assessment Roll -- Local Improvement District No. 215" dated May 18. I was
again surprised that I am being assessed for two "Equivalent Service Connections" - but I
only have one lot and one sewer connection. I object to being assessed for two
connections on the following basis:
1. As stated - one lot - one connection.
2. When I first learned of the two-connection issue, I wrote Mr. Gary
Kenworthy on March 7, 1998 - copy attached. He responded March 18
that staff would be recommending only one connection charge. Please
provide a copy of that recommendation to the Council. I assumed this
response recognized the inequity in the double charge.
3. My property is only one lot - and there has been no action to change that.
After annexation, any consideration of subdivision would have violated
City ordinances - not allowing subdivision on Non-city Streets. There
was never intent to subdivide nor could it have been subdivided. This then
cannot be a factor. When I was assessed for the electrical buy out - see
letter April 7, 1995 - I was charged for one lot. See Attachment.
4. The cost of the project increased due to a three-year delay -- and actually
doing the project in a poor construction season. Some of this delay was
due to the City's activities to seek "special" easements when easements
already existed on our property. See letter Sept 2, 1997.
5. If the "Equivalent Service Connection" approach is based on lot size, the
sewer line/connection to my lot was minimal. I was not offered a
connection closer to my house site - so my costs for installing a sewer line
to the hook up were high and excessive. IfI was going to be charged for a
second hook up, I should have been told so -- (I was told I would not) --
before I applied for my building permit in December 9~- and I should
have been provided a more convenient and less costly hook up option.
See attached layout.
100
Page 2
6. I had assumed that we had an understanding - before I started
construction. I have done everything possible to cooperate - including the
hook up location creating additional personal cost. I also had installed, at
my own expense a 60 foot drainage culvert at the sewer crossing of
Woodhaven Lane at the Golf Course Road intersection to improve
drainage in the area - something which should have been engineered in
the project. This culvert cost me over $500 to install.
I have no objection to paying my share - and I appreciate now being in the
City with City sewer. But I cannot in any way understand the equity or
justification of the double charge.
Sincerely,
STER ~
1840 Woodhaven Lane ~Z)o ~ T['~y L FOSTE]~
Port Angeles, WA 98362
(360) 452-7292
cc: Gary KenWorthy
101
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
II
321 East Fifth Street, PO Box 1150 Phone (360) 417-4805 TTY Phone (360) 417-4645
PUBLIC WORKS Port Angeles, Washington 98362-I 150 Fax (360) 417-4609 · e-mail papwdept@olympus.net
March 18, 1998
Mr. Dick Foster
73 Island View Road
Port Angeles, WA 98362
RE: LID 215 Assessment
Dear Mr. Foster:
We have reviewed your letter of March 7, 1998 regarding the basis for your
assessment of two potential sewer connections and that your are constructing a new
home which would preclude further subdivision. We will be reviewing the changed
conditions for your property and others within the LID prior to the final assessment
determination. In your case we will be recommending reduction to o.ne co,nnection:
Please call if yo6 have further questions.
Thanks for your donation of the 60 foot culvert crossing Woodhaven Lane at the Golf
Course Road intersection to improve the drainage in the area.
Very truly yours,
G~ry W. Kenworthy, P.E.
City Engineer
GWK:gk
Copies: J. Pit'tis
B Titus
FiDe:Disk: 95-05 N:~'PROJ ECTS~5'05LID~$SESSM']'~FOSTER'GWK
102
March 7, 1998
Mr. Gary Ken~vorthy
City Engineer
City of Port Angeles
321 East Fifth St.
PortAngeles, WA 98362
Dear Gary:
I fu'st want to thank you for the fine efforts of the City in expediting the Woodhaven Sewer
project. While a delay wouldn't have affected my building plans, it would have presented a real
problem for neighbors. I also want to thank you, and Bob Leach of NTI for your prompt
consideration and approval of my request to install a culvert on Woodhaven while the sewer ·
ditch was open. This solves a drainage problem which was created at the time of the original
development. We installed a 60' long, 1' diameter culvert and the contractor improved the
integrity of the drainage ditch.
As you know, we have a building permit for construction of a house starting in April using the
entire 1.7 acre lot. Accordingly, when the sewer was installed, only one hookup was requested
and installed--so the cost of extending the sewer line for a second hookup, should I have
considered allowable subdivision, was avoided. It was never my plan to subdivide and with the
planned construction, that will no longer even be possible.
When the initial estimated sewer LID assessments were developed, my property assessment was
double ($9531.20 versus $4765.60). Was this because it was expected that there would be two
separate lots with' two connections? Anyway, as you approach the revision to the estimated
charges (per Jeff/Jack letter of October 8, 1997) would you review the basis for my estimate and
let me know if that is still the appropriate share based on the fact that my lot has one connection
and will never be subdivided--per my permit and house plans.
I know this has been a difficult project during a normal busy schedule. We appreciate being in
the City, having the sewer service and expecially appreciate your and other individuals efforts in
making it happen.
Sincerely,
DICK FOSTER
73 Island View Road
Port A ngeles,'WA' 98362
452-9516
103
III I I I
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
321 EAST FIFTH ST., P.O. BOX 1150 PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON 98362
· · PHONE (206) 457-0411
April 7, 1995
Mr. Richard Foster
73 Island View Road
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Dear Mr. Foster:
Port Angeles City Light or Clallam County PUD has been providing electric service to all customers
in Clallam County. 'We serve residents and businesses in Port Angeles and Clallam County PUD
serves residents and businesses throughout the rest of the county. A formal agreement was signed
in 1992 establishing the city limits as the dividing line between Port Angeles City Light and Clallam
County PUD so both utilities could adequately plan for future load growth and to avoid a duplication ..
of electrical facilities.
Your property was recently annexed into the city limits. A condition of the annexation was that we
would be compensated by the owners of the property within the annexation area for purchasing the
electric facilities from Clallam County PUD. We recalculated the compensation based on the actual
purchase price of $71,056.80. Since the actual purchase price was lower than our estimate it reduced
the payment options as follows.:
1. One lump sum payment of $1,279.15 per lot;
2. For undeveloped lots, one lump stun payment at the time electric service is received in the
amount of $1',279.15 per lot plus interest'at the annual rate of 6.5 percent;
You indicated that you would prefer a lump sum payment of $1,279.15 - see attached invoice. If
you would like to change your payment option or if you have any questions, please feel free to call
me at (360) 457-0411 extension 192.
Sincerely, ~ ~,~
Steven E. Hursh
Engineering Manager
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
III
321 East Fifth StreeL PO Box 1150 Phone (360) 4 i 7-4805 TTY Phone (360) 417-4645
PUBLIC WORKS Port Angeles, Washington 98362-1150 Fax (360) 417-4609 e-mail papwdept@olyrnpus.net
September 2, 1997
TO: Ll.D. 215 Property Owners
RE: Wastewater L.I.D. 215, Construction Delay
Dear Property Owner:
The construction of L.I.D. 215, Which we had anticipated to be well under construCtion by
this time, is being delayed. Completion of the project had been anticipated for this fall.
Prior to being able to advertise for bids and award the project, all easements for sewer
construction and future maintenance must be obtained and recorded. The negotiation for
these easements is taking longer than usual and some redesign is necessary to
accommodate those easements which were not granted. These easement acquisition
difficulties, coupled with loss of critical engineering staff at the City and our Engineering
Consultant, have resulted in the construction delay.
The project design and specifications have been completed, except for last minute
changes related to the easements. We will advertise and award the project when the
easements have been recorded. To the extent weather allows, construction will proceed
as soon as possible and continue until winter conditions mandate a shutdown. In view of
typical winter and spring weather, completion of the project is not likely until early summer
1998.
The portion of the sewer along Melody Lane was completed for the LID. by the developer
of Highland Commons. Sewer connections may be made to this portion upon payment of
connection and ~_yst'em 'cl~ar~'¢. Ll.D. assessments for all property owners within the
'"~-L-.t:D?~i-Ii r~-0t-be-~'Ee-untiFthe EI.D. is totally completed and the final assessment set at
a public hearing.
We apologize for the delays and resultant inconveniences. Hopefully we can finish up the
easements and advertise the project in time to complete some construction this year.
Very tru~ours,/
City Engineer
GWK:gk
Copies: J. Pomeranz
J. Pittis
NTI
Disk: N:~PROJECTS~95-OSLID~MEMOS~ELAY.GWK
File: 95-05.05
105
'\
24, ! 999
City of Port Angeles
Becky J. Upton, CMC
City Clerk
321 West Fifth Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Dear Becky;
This letter is regarding the "notice of hearing on final assessment roll, local improvement
district no. 215".
After reviewing the assessment charges for our two pieces of property on Melody Lane, l
continue to have concern about paying for a sewer hookup for our antenna farm. Much of
our antenna tam property is wetland and I continue to believe that building anything on
this site short ora small storage shed, may not be practical. My wife and I do not have a
problem paying for a sewer hookup for this piece of property if we can be assured that
that we can actually build on the property and use it. I don't believe it should be our
responsibility to prove that this piece of property is buildable since the City is asking us to
pay for the sewer hookup. Please send me a letter stating we would have no trouble
getting a building permit for this piece of property and we will be happy to pay our portion
of the LID.
Sincerely,
' j~m~M~acDonald
Radio Pacific Inc.
1820 E. Woodhaven Lane
Port Angeles, WA 98362
June 9, 1999 c~ry OF PORT ANGELES
CITY CI ERK
Becky J. Upton, CMC
City Clerk
City of Port Angeles
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362-0217
re: Objection to Final Assessment Roll; LID No. 215; Parcel No. 27; Tax Number
063014 149 130; City Council Heating Date 6-15-99
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We are the owners of parcel 27, within Local Improvement District No. 215. The tax
number for this unimproved lot is 063014 149 130. The final assessment roll indicates that the total
assessment for parcel 27 is $21,304.08, which is based on three service connections for this lot.
We object to the assessment because this is a single lot, which can not be short platted into ..
three separate lots due to the fact that Woodhaven Lane is a private road. See, Port Angeles
Municipal Code Sec. 16.04.070(A)(1), which requires that each short platted lot abut on a dedicated,
improved and maintained city street. See, also, letter fi.om Gary W. Kenworthy, City Engineer, to
our predecessor, Gary D. Thompson, dated August 26, 1997, a copy of which is attached. Since
parcel 27 is a single lot, incapable of being short platted, there is no rational basis for assessing it
based on three service connections rather than on one service connection. Thus, the assessment for
parcel 27 should be $7,101.36. Further, the assessment against parcel 27 is founded upon a
fundamentally wrong basis, and is arbitrary and capricious because the assessment is disproportionate
to the benefit conferred, and because other parcels, within LID 215, which are similarly situated and
which are receiving exactly the same benefits are being assessed at one-third of the amount of the
assessment for parcel 27.
In conclusion, we respectfully request that the assessment for parcel 27 be reduced to
$7,101.36, so that it is in conformity with the other single lots within the LID.
Very truly yours, w
Dean A. Bensen
108
II
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
321 East Fifth Street. PO Box I 150 Phone 1360) 417-4805 TTY Phone (360) 417-4645
PUBLIC WORKS Port Angeles. Washineton 98362-1150 Fax 13601 417-4609 e-mail papwdept~olympus.net
AugustPort Angeles, 26' 1997 WA 98362 j~-~j.~ [~ ~ ~ [~ ~ [~]r~.L.~
920 Caroline A 2 ~ ~J~
/ " ORI ANGELES -
RE: Woodhaven Lane, Short Plat Requirements for Right of Way Dedi~IinnI~/i~IIN~f)ARTMEI~
Improvements.
Dear Mr. Thompson:
As a follow up to our meeting of August 26, 1997 and the Planning Department's letter of June 9,
1997, we offer the following regarding street dedication and improvements required by ordinance for
shod plats:
The ordinance requires that each lot of a shod plat abut on a dedicated, improved, and maintained
City street. The ordinance further requires that the dght of way shall meet minimum width standards
and that the roadway meet minimum improvement standards. For your property on Woodhaven Lane
which is currently a pdvate street, this would require dedication of a 60 foot wide right of way from
the westedy street frontage of your property easterly to the existing Golf Course Road dght of way.
The existing VVoodhaven Lane road improvements' meet our minimum standards and would be
maintained in its current configuration by the City upon full dedication to Golf Course Road. Please
note that dedication will not require the abutting owners to improve Woodhaven Lane to full City
Standards. Full improvements, with curb and gutter, would only be required as a condition of a full
subdivision or road improvement L.I.D.. It is unlikely that a full subdivision is feasible on the
properties accessing Woodhaven Lane. The road improvement L.I.D. proposed with the annexation
was not supported by the property owners. Dedication of VVoodhaven Lane to the City should be a
plus to the neighborhood in that the street would be maintained, including snow plowing in prionty
sequence, at no additional cost to the owners. In addition the dedicated roadway properties would
be removed from the tax rolls.
Hopefully this will assist you in your decision to short plat your property.
Very,truly yours, /
City Engineer
GWK:gk
Copies: J. Pittis
B. Collins
C. K~utson
Disk:N:~°ROJ ECTSt95-05LIDWIEMOS~THMPSN3. GWK
File: 95-05.10
109
~PS ~RM 80~ '
110
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
..,~:L~... Assessor s Office
- ::;~:;?"Lmda... Owem-Rosenb~gh
~"f.?):.'. Po~ ~gclcs, WA 98362
..' :.?j~?'.':~: Request for f~ or agfic~e l~d ceaificafion in. L.I.D 215
-:%?;:; De~ Ms OWens-Rosenbmgh
-,":;¢~{~': :~e Ci~ of Pon ~geles h~ recemly completed a s~ sewer ~.I.D. 215) ~ ~e Upper Golf
: }~(.~;~- Co~se Road ~ea. Per RCW 84.34.310, ~e Ci~ would like to request ~cmion or re~ipt of
?j~::~}:}.~ fil~g ~om yom office ~ to my properties ~ ~e Ll.D./, ~at does or does not con~n f~ /
:.'f-)}.{7 ..If prope~ wi~n L.I.D. 215 does not con~n ~y f~ ~d agficul~e l~d plebe send m
'--"' .. .': ce~ified'copies of w~vers or exempfiom to ~t effect..
' -: "Enclosed ~e ~e p~ceFn~bers con,ned ~n ~e L.I.D. 215 ~sessed boodles.
?j}~.~.- !fyou have ~y question, feel ~ee to contact me at 417-4807
Trenia F~ston
. Engineering Pe~it Specialist
321 EAST FIFTH STREET · P. O. BOX ! 150 · PORT ANGELES, WA 98362-O217
PHONE: 360-417-4805 · FAX: 360-417-4542 · TTY: 360-417-4645
E-MAIL: PU BWOR KS@Cl. PORT-ANGE LES.WA. U S
111
CLALLAM COUNTY
: OFFICE OF
COUNTY ASSESSOI
CLALLAM COUNTY COURTHOUSE
223 EAST FOU~T~ Smmrr / P.O. Box 863
PO~T ANOat.ES, WASm~OTOS 98362-O149
060) 417-2400
LINDA OWlNGS-ROSENBURGH, ASSESSOR, (360) 417-2204 FAX 060) 417-2299
SHIRLEY E. ALMADEN, ADMINISTRATIVE ASST., (360) 417-2213
March 24, 1999
City of Port Angeles
Public Works Department
Trenia Funston, Engineering Permit Specialist
PO Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362 ..
Re: Farm/Agriculture land certification in Ll.D. 215
Dear Trenia
This letter is to certify that my office has verified the taxable status of the properties listed on the
attached sheet, and that as of this date, none of them are enrolled in a Farm/Agriculture current use
program.
Sincerely ~-~.
kinda Owings-Rosenburgh
Assessor (360 417-2204
Enclosures
112
ADDRESSES INSIDE LID #23 063014110030 #31 063014110150
L':\DATA\WP~LID215EE.WPD 022 063014110000 #29 063014110130
James R. / Terry L McDonald Richard O. Hendrickson
October 24, 1997 PO Box 1450 1826 Melody Ln.
P A, WA 98362 P A, WA 98362
#26 063014110080 #30 063014110140 #25 063014110070
Doris Taggart William E. Barker III Larry D. Racine
1830 Melody Ln. 1834 Melody Ln. 1838 Melody Ln.
PA, WA 98362 P A, WA 98362 P A, WA 98362
#28 06301.4110120
#24 063014110060 #28 063014110110 #27 063014110090
Neva Marie McLennan Trust Terry G. McDonald Gary A. Lappier
1842 Melody Ln. 920 Golf Course Rd. 924 Golf Course Rd.
P A, WA 98362 PA, WA 98362 PA, WA 98362
#8 063014149080
City of Port Angeles #11 063014149050 #3 063014140130
PO Box 1150 Grant J. Munro Elmer P. Krogue
Port Angeles, WA 1765 E. Woodhaven Ln. 463 Lupine Way
98362 P A, WA 98362 Ventura, CA 93001
#9 063014149060 #10 063014149070 #1 063014140030
Brian Jones Olive T. Grimes Mary A. Neske
1741 E. Woodhaven Ln. 1753 Woodhaven 1120 S. Golf Course Rd.
PA, WA 98362 P A, WA 98363 PA, WA 98362
06301414910 #5 063014149020 #18 063014149150
David B. Bork Rodgers Family Trust Casey Me Kinny
1216 S. Golf Course Rd 1837 E. Woodhaven Ln. 1823 Woodhaven
PA, WA 98362 PA, WA 98362 PA, WA 98362
#21 063014149180 #12 063014149090 #13 063014149100
David H. Hagiwara Kenneth / April Speer Dean M. Reed
1809 Woodhaven Ln. 1733 Woodhaven Ln. 1727 E. Woodhaven Ln.
PA, WA 98362 PA, WA 98362 PA, WA 98362
#14 063014149110
#2 063014140110 #15 063014149120 #17 063014149140
Darrell Peterson Dennis Michael Nathan Etal Jt. Linda A. Wilcox
1036 E. 1st. St. 1712 Woodhaven Ln. 1720 E. Woodhaven Ln.
PA, WA 98362 PA, WA 98362 PA, WA 98362
#19 063014149160
#20 063014149170 #16 063014149130 #7 063014149040
Richard G. Bradley Dean A. / Carlela T. Bensen Richard A. Foster
1806 Nancy Ln. 1830 E. Woodhaven Ln. 1840 E Woodhaven
PA, WA 98362 PA, WA 98362 PA, WA 98362
"r 063014149030 # 063013230190 # 063013239010
.'. George E. Grier Richard/Karen Brown Fritz Conrad
1845 E. Woodhaven Lane 1311 S. Golf Course Rd. 1921 E. Maddock Rd.
PA, WA. 98362 PA, WA 98362 PA, WA 98362
113
SEE RUDDICK SEE ENGLISH # 06301323110
Gerald A. Levesque Machel E. Fox Dorthy Schmuck
245 Nicki Lane 2007 Maddoek Rd. 307 Mt. Pleasant Rd.
Sequim, WA 98382 Port Angeles, WA 98362 PA, WA 98362
SEE ANA MARIE
CHEVARRIA # 063013230030 # 063013230020
Michel Ron'E H.H. Heerschap Bette J. Kerrigan
P.O. Box 1727 37242 42nd Ave. S. 2038 E. Lindberg Road
Santa Monica, CA 90406 Auburn, WA 98001 PA, WA 98362
# 063013230090
Ana Marie T. E. Chevarria # 063013230260 # 063013239020
c/o 602 National Life Ins. Monte W. / Leslie English Lance M. Ruddiek
Ayala Ave Makati Metro 2007 East Maddock Rd 1937 Maddoek Rd
Manila Phillipines PA, WA 98362 PA, WA 98362
114
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, approving and
confirming the final assessment roll for Utility Local Improvement
District No. 215, which has been created and established for the purpose
of financing sanitary sewer improvements within the Upper Golf Course
Road area of the City, as described in Ordinance No. 2939, as amended,
and levying and assessing the amount thereof against the lots, tracts,
parcels of land and other property shown on said roll.
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2939 of the City of Port Angeles, Washington (the
"City"), passed by the City Council (the "Council") on December 16, 1996, Local Improvement
District No. 215 was created to finance sanitary sewer improvements within the Upper Golf Course
area of the City (as described in Ordinance No. 2939, the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 3020 of the City, passed by the Council on June 1, 1999,
such local improvement district was converted to a utility local improvement district known as Utility
Local Improvement District No. 215 ("ULID 215"); and
WHEREAS, an assessment roll levying special assessments against the properties located
within ULID 215 has been filed with the City Clerk of the City as provided by law; and
WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of a hearing on and of making objections to the
assessment roll was duly published at and for the time and in the manner provided by law, fixing the
time and place of hearing thereon for the 154 day of June, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council chambers
at the Port Angeles City Hall, 321 East 5~', Port Angeles, Washington, and further notice thereof was
duly mailed by the City Clerk to each properly owner on said roll;
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed and designated in said notice, the hearing on said
assessment roll was duly held and the Council, sitting as a board of equalization, gave due
consideration to all written and oral protests received and all persons appearing at said heafi~g~
NOW, THEREFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES_
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. The Coundl, sitting as a board of equalization and having made all revisions
to the roll it deems necessary, hereby finds and determines that the final assessment roll for ULID 215
is just and equitable and that no assessment against property within ULID 215 is greater than the
special benefits to be derived from the Improvements. Accordingly, the final assessment roll, in the
total amount of $532,602.00, is hereby approved and confirmed, and the assessments set forth therein
are hereby levied against each lot, tract and parcel of property described in the roll.
Section 2. The Treasurer of the City is hereby directed to hold and collect the final
assessment roll for ULID 215. The amount of each assessment set forth in the roll, together with any
interest or penalty imposed from time to time, shall be a lien against the property so assessed. The
lien shall be paramount and superior to any other lien or encumbrance whatsoever, theretofore t--.
therea~er created, except a lien for general taxes.
Section 3. Upon receipt of the final assessment roll for ULID 215, the Treasurer of the
City is hereby directed to publish notice at the times and in the manner required by RCW 35.49.010,
stating that the roll is in her hands for collection and that such assessments or any portion thereof may
be paid to the City at any time within 30 days from the date of the first publication of such notice,
without penalty, interest or costs.
Section 4. The amount of any assessment, or any portion thereof, against property in
ULID 215 not paid within the 30 day period from the date of the first publication of the City
Treasurer's notice shall be payable in 10 equal annual installments, together with interest on the
diminishing principal balance thereof at a rate of O. 5% per annum higher than the interest rate of the
water and wastewater revenue bonds sold to finance the Improvements. Interest shall commence,
116
the 30a day following first publication of such notice. The first installment shall become due and
payable one year fi.om the expiration of the 30-day prepayment period. Annual installments, including
interest and penalty, shall be paid in full when due, and no partial payments shall be accepted by the
Treasurer of the City.
Section 5. Any installment not paid when due shall thereupon become delinquent. All
delinquent installments shall be subject to a penalty equal to 12% per annum of the mount of the
installment, including interest, fi.om the date of the delinquency until paid.
Section 6. The lien of any assessment may be discharged at any time after the 30-day
prepayment period by payment of the entire principal amount of the assessment remaining unpaid
together with interest thereon to the due date of the next installment.
Section 7. If any one or more of the provisions of this ordinance shall be declared by a
court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, then such provision shall be null and void and
shall be deemed severable fi.om the remaining provisions of this ordinance and shall in no way affect
the validity of the other provisions of this ordinance.
Section 8. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after the date of publication.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the day of ,1999.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
117
'CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned, Clerk of the City of Port Angeles, Washington (the "City"), and
keeper of the records of the City Council of the City (the "Council"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY:
1. That the attached ordinance is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. ~ of
the Council (the "Ordinance"), as finally passed at a regular meeting of the
Council held on the m day of ,1999.
2. That said meeting was duly convened and held in all respects in accordance with
law, and to the extent required by law, due and proper notice of such meeting
was given; that a quorum of the Council was present throughout the meeting and
a legally sufficient number of members of the Council voted in the proper manner
for the passage of said Ordinance; that all other requirements and proceedings
incident to the proper adoption or passage of said Ordinance have been duly
fiflfilled, carried out and otherwise observed, and that I am authorized to execute
this certificate.
12q WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this __ day of ,
1999.
City Clerk
-4-
118
J~e 4, l~ FINAL ASSESMENT ROLL
Upper Golf Course Road Sewer ULID # 215
Parcel Name & Tax Equivaleat Total Eai~n~ibacl Q 6.5°,6 for 10 Y~,
Number Address Number Service Assesrnent ANNUAL TOTAL
Cormcctions AMOUNT AMOUNT
1 James R. / Teny L. McDonald D63014 110000 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
P.O. Box 1430
Port Angeles, WA
98362
2 James R. / Terry L. McDonald 063014 i 10030 I $7,101.36 $9~7.83 $9,878.32
P.O. Box 1450
Pon Angles, WA
98362
3 Richard G. Hendrickson 063014 110150 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1826 Melody Ln
:Port Angeles, WA
98362
4 Richard G. Hendrlckson 063014 110130 1 $7,101.:36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1826 Melody Ln
Port Ansdes, WA
98362
5 Doris B. Taggart :063014 110080 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1830 Melody La
Port Angeles, WA
98362
6 William E. Barker III 063014 110140 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
834 Melody Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362~
7 Larry D. Racine 063014 110070 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1838 Melody Ln.
Port Angeles, WA
98362
8 McLennan Trust, Nm, a Marie 063014 110060 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1842 Melody Ln
Port Angeles, WA
983'62
9 Terry G. McDonald 063014 110110 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
920 Golf Coum Rd
Port Angeles, WA
98362
10 Terry G. McDonald 063014 110120 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,8i8.32
920 C-olfCouw Rd
Port Angeles, WA
98362
11 Gary A. Lappier 063014 110090 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
924 Golf Course Rd
Port Angeles, WA
98362
EXHIBIT A (115)
Parcel Name & Tax Equivalent Total Estimat~ Q 6.5% for 10
Number Address Number Service Assesment ANNUAL TOTAL
Connections AMOUNT AMOUNT
]2 Cily of Port Anl~eles 0630]4 140110 ! $7,101.36 $,7'~7.83 $9,8?8.32
~21 E. Fifth St.
Port Angeles, WA
98362
13 Grant J. Munro 063014 149050 I $7,101.36 $987.83
1765 E. Wocdhav~n Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
14 Elmer P. Krosu¢ 063014 140130 4 $28,405.44 $3,951.33 $39,513.30
463 Lupine Way
Venmra, CA
93001
15 Brian Jones 063014 149060 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
425 Red Rock Dr.
Wadsworth, OH
44281-2208
16 Oliv~ T. C~imes 963014 149070 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,~?~.32
1753 Woodhawn tn.
iPort Angeles, WA
98362,
17 Grant J. Munro 063014 149080 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1765 E. Woodhaven Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
18 Mary A. Nesk¢ 063014 140030 10 $71,013.60 $9,878.32 $98,783.25
1120 S. Golf Course Rd 1000
Port Angeles, WA
98362
19 )avid B. Bork 063014 149010 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1216 $. Golf Course Rd
Port Angeles, WA
98362
20 Ro~ers Fnmily Trust 063014 149020 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,~i7t~.32
! 837 E. Woodhaven Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
21 E.W. & Susan L. MclGnney 063014 149150 I $7,101.36 $987.83 $9,878.32
1823 E. Woodhaven Ln.
Port Angeles, WA
98:362
22 David H. Ha~iwara ,063014 149180 I $7,101 .~6 $987.83 $9,878.32
1809 Woodhaven Ln
Port Angeles, WA
98362
1 20 EXHIBIT A (215)
parc, rJ Nm'ne & Tm[ I Equiv~kat ToI~I E~-Umeted ~ 6.5% ~ 10 Y~ ·
Num~ ~s Num~ ~ ~ ~NU~ TOT~
~n~s AMOU~ ~OU~
33 ~~ ~m~ ~30]3 230l~ I $7,101.~ $~7.~ ~,~8.~
:1311 S. ~u~ ~-
~ ~ ~Sd~ WA
9~
34 ;H~ "' ~3013 ~iO .l
l~l E. M~k Rd
p~ ~ WA
98362
35 ~ M. Rudd~ ~3013 23~0 I $7,101.~ $~7.~ $9,8~.~
'1937 E. M~dd~ ~.
Pon ~8~ WA
98~62
36 M~m W./~Ue ~g~h ~3013 2302~ I $7,101.~ ~7.~ ~,~8.~
~ E.~k ~.
P~ ~d~ WA
9~62
37 ~y 8~mu~k ~3013 ~0110 7 $~,7~.52 ~,g14.~ $~,1~.~
~07 MC ~t Rd
p~ ~ WA
99362
38 Michael R~'e ~3013 23~ 7 $~,7~.~ $~,g14.~ $~,1~.~
P.O. ~ 172~
San~ M~ ~
39 H.H. H~hap ~013 ~30 9 $~,g12.24 $8,~ ' $~,~.~
~37242 42nd A~. S. ~Y 615' +/-
- Aubu~ WA
98~1
1~ TOTAL AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT A (415) 121
'cx~ ~ Pm, aN~S SCA~
~ mXHmm)
;ws~O~ e: GCLIONE~.d=~
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, establishing the charges for
connection to the Upper Golf Course Road
sanitary sewer and establishing Chapter 13.72 of
the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
WHEREAS, following the formation of Utility Local
Improvement District No. 215, the City of Port Angeles has
completed constructing sanitary sewer mains to serve Upper Golf
Course Road, making sanitary sewer service available to the area;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Port Angeles has
determined that it is in the public interest to require that a
portion of the cost incurred in constructing said sewer facilities
shall be paid by the owners of parcels of property, which were not
charged a $7,101.36 equivalent waste water service assessment
pursuant to ULID 215, in the event such property owners desire to
connect to said Upper Golf Course Road sanitary sewer main; and
WHEREAS, the cost for the Upper Golf Course Road sewer
facilities not financed by ULID 215 is $319,561.20, which cost is
the basis for calculating an appropriate charge for connecting to
said line;
WHEREAS, the proportionate share of the cost of
construction of the sewer facilities attributable to the estimated
45 parcels outside ULID 215 that would eventually utilize said
123
facilities property is $7,101.36 per equivalent waste water
service.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT
ANGELES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1 - Upper Golf Course Road Sewer Connection Charge
Established. There is hereby established a charge for connection
to the Upper Golf Course Road sanitary sewer, which will be charged
for all new sewer service connections to the sanitary sewer
facilities constructed by the City for ULID 215. The Upper Golf
Course Road, sewer connection charge shall apply to all properties
outside ULID 215 and to sewer service connections for all service
connections for properties within ULID 215, for which equivalent
service connections were not assessed pursuant to ULID 215. _
Section 2 - Upper Golf Course Road Sewer Connection Charg~
- Amount. The Upper Golf Course Road sewer connection charge
shall be $7,101.36 per connection.
Section 3 - Addition to Other Charges. The Upper Golf
Course Road sewer connection charge imposed pursuant to this
Chapter shall be in addition to the connection charge for the
actual cost of connecting to the City sewer system, the tapping
fee, the secondary sewer assessment, and to all other charges
imposed by ordinance.
Section 4 - Upper Golf Course Road Sewer Connection Charge
- When Collected. The Upper Golf Course Road sewer connection
- 2 -
124
charge shall be paid upon application for a sewer permit unless
otherwise agreed upon between the property owner and the City.
Connection to the system shall not be made until the Upper Golf
Course Road sewer connection charge, standard connection charges,
tapping fee, secondary sewer assessment, and any other charges
imposed by ordinance have been paid.
Section 5 - Upper Golf Course Road Sewer Connection Charqe
- Interest. Pursuant to RCW 35.92.025, a charge for interest
shall be added to the Upper Golf Course Road sewer connection
charge. Such interest shall be from the date of final formation of
ULID 215 until payment of the Upper Golf Course Road sewer
connection charge, not to exceed ten (10) years. The interest
charged shall be calculated at a rate commensurate with the rate of
interest applicable to the City at the time of construction of the
sewer facilities, not to exceed ten (10) percent per year; provided
that the aggregate amount of interest shall not exceed the amount
of the Upper Golf Course Road sewer connection charge unless
aUthorized by amendment of applicable state law.
Section 6 - Notice. The City shall record appropriate
notice with the County Auditor concerning real property, which has
been specifically identified by the City Engineer and approved by
the City Council as property for which the Upper Golf Course Road
sewer facilities have been constructed and for which the special
connection charge will be levied upon connection of such property
- 3 -
125
to the City sewer system pursuant to the requirements of Chapter
65.08 RCW or as otherwise provided by agreement between the City
and the property owner. Such notice shall be effective until there
is recorded with the Clallam County Auditor a certificate of
payment and release executed by the City, which certificate shall
be recorded by the owner at the owner's expense within thirty (30)
days of full payment of such special connection charge.
Section 7 - Codification. This ordinance shall be codified
as Chapter 13.72 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
Section 8 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take
effect five days after publication.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at
a regular meeting of said Council held on the 15th day of June,
1999.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
A:~99.~
-- 4 --
126
:5:::::.::::::::
~ CHUCK E. MARUNDE, ATTORNEYAT LAw, P.S.
P.O. Box 3303, 2 71 SOUTH 7TH A VENUE, SUITE 24
SEQUIM, WASHINGTON 98382
(360) 683-8205 E-mail Address
Fax (360) 683-8227 Real Estate Law & Estate Planning wlin~olypen.com
Real Estate: www. olypen.com/wlin Certified Estate Planner www. olypen.com/wlin/estateplan
June 14, 1999
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk ,~ [ i~ ~9
City of Port Angeles
321 East 5th Street
Port Angeles, Washington 98362 ~w OF PORT ANGEl. El
CITY CLERK,
RE: Mary A. Neske
Parcel #063014-140030
LID District No. 215
Objection Submitted in Response to Notice of Hearing on Final Assessment Roll
Hearing Date: June 15, 1999 at 7:00 P.M.
Dear Mrs. Upton:
I represent Mary Neske in regard to Local Improvement District No 215 and the proposed
assessment of over $71,000.00.
My client is an elderly widow on a limited income who has lived in the same home on
this 10-acre parcel since 1951. She and her husband paid $2,500.00 for the parcel,
The assessment of over $71,000.00 comes as quite a shock to my client, and I deem it to
be an excessively high assessment and inequitably assessed to my client for several reasons.
1. The assessment is about 25% of the estimated fair market value of the property;
2. My client may be forced to sell the property just to pay the assessment;
3. The 10-acre parcel has apparently been assessed for purposes of this LID as 10 -
one acre parcels, even though it is not currently divided, and even may or may not
be dividable as such;
4. The 10-acre parcel includes areas of wetlands;
5. The 10-acre parcel includes two major easements (Bonneville Power and a city
water line) over and across the parcel as shown on the attached drawing of the
property (which includes the location of the house);
My client is on a fixed income and feels she was coerced into the original agreement of
annexation and the granting of a right-of-way. The neighbors apparently had a great need to have
a sewer line, and my client felt the pressure to cooperate. There was a family meeting in which
this issue was discussed and it was felt by the family and my client in that meeting in 1993 that
my client would be willing to participate to help her neighbors as long as she was assessed for
one hook-up as anyone with a single family residence would be.
Objection to Assessment
Mary lqeske Letter of June 14, 1999
Page 2
In a letter to the City in February of 1994, my client reiterated the importance to her of a
fair and equitable assessment, one that would tax each parcel owner for the existing use with
latecomers paying for their share of connection and use charges. This proposal made eminent
sense, because it left the property in its current use (and market forces being what they are this
means that the property would be in its highest and best use), assessed property owners their
current fair share of the assessment, and at the same time provided a means for the City to assess
equitably against those future users who would become owners of subdivided property. This is a
standard practice for real estate developers.
When my client agreed to and did transfer a 30-foot easement over and across her
property to the City, she did so with expectation that the early discussions and reasonableness
would prevail, not that an unfair and excessive assessment would be made against her. As of this
letter, my client has received no compensation from the City for granting the easement across her
property.
Apparently, the City had someone determine that my client's parcel could be divided into
nine parcels. This is not likely for the reasons already stated and since no consideration was
apparently given to the need to plan for the necessary space for easements for access and utilities,
storm water and drainage, etc. My client's property most likely will not make nine or even ten
parcels. The wetlands and the two major easements would prohibit such a division. In any
event, she should not be forced into selling or attempting to subdivide and sell her property.
According to my calculations, my client has been assessed with one-seventh of the entire
cost of the project. Many years ago, my client and her husband put this property into the open
space classification. They never intended to develop it. The two easements and the wetlands
would have made development a significant challenge assuming it was practical. The City's
assessment also means my client would not only be taxed the $71,000, but the additional amount
of taxes the County will want for back taxes, since taking selling the property and taking it out of
the open space classification would trigger all the back years' full property taxes. This is a
severe penalty on top of a severe tax for an elderly woman.
In summary, I object on behalf of my client to the assessment of $71,000. I request that
my client's property be assessed as one parcel in the amount of approximately $7,100, and the if
and when she or her heirs ever subdivide the 10 acres, then and only then should each parcel bear
it's fair share of the assessment.
Thank you for your consideration and fairness in dealing with a long time and respected
resident, Mary Neske. Her entire family and I look forward to your assistance in resolving this
assessment equitably.
Objection to Assessment
Mary Neske Letter of June 14, 1999
Page 3
Very truly yours,
Chuck E. Manmde
F13
David H. Hagiwara
1809 E. Woodhaven Lane
Port Angeles WA 98362
June 11, 1999
Port Angeles City Council
321 East Fifth Street
Port Angeles WA 98362
Dear Honorable Council Members,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Final Assessment Roll for Local
Improvement District No. 215. As you may be aware, this has been an ongoing
issue to property owners in the area since 1993 and we are pleased that
construction has finally been complete. There is concern on my part however, that
the proposed assessment for my particular lot has increased 67% from the
original estimate of $4765.60 to a proposed $7101.36. My vote to move forward
with the LID was certainly based on the original good faith figure and although my
vote may have been the same based on the higher figure, I'm not sure whether
other property owners feel the same way. Being somewhat familiar with public
works contracts and construction, I understand the possibility always exists for
cost overruns. However, this issue was brought up in a meeting with the past City
Manager in response to a neighborhood letter (attached). There was recognition
in that meeting that there may in fact be cost overruns due to winter construction
and that the City should not be looking to the neighborhood to recoup those cost
overruns. There was a general feeling that the City Manger agreed, and that in
fact, the construction delays were a result of loss in "critical engineering staff at
the City~ (per the September 2, 1997 letter) and not any fault of the property
owners. While Mr. Pomeranz is no longer here as the City Manager, I certainly
felt comfortable that he was committed to minimize the impact to the property
owners, especially since the City would be deriving revenue through service
hookups and monthly fees.
Another issue you also need to be aware of is that the property owners on
Woodhaven Lane have already borne some additional costs to repair the road
that was damaged during the construction. We are certainly appreciative that the
City agreed to share in a part of that repair, but there is still a feeling that those
repairs should have been completed in full by the City per the easement
agreements signed by the property owners.
There may be additional issues raised by other property owners that may or may
not result in reductions in their particular assessments. I want to make certain
that whatever decision you make on an individual basis that may reduce the
overall pool of money being assessed, will not result in additional assessments
being then be placed back on the remaining property owners that have chosen to
remain silent. Per your Public Notice dated May 18, I hereby reserve my right to
objection of your Final Assessment Roll subject to your final action.
In conclusion, I feel that based on the fact that the LID was entered into in good
faith by the property owners based on the original figures and that construction
delays were the result of the City's lack of action and not the fault of the property
owners, any cost overrun should be borne by the City. You have the ability to
assess future hook ups, the cost of sewer extension via a connection charge. In
fact this may give you the incentive to actively pursue additional annexation to
help off set this project's over run. Thank you again for letting me express my
thoughts and I look forward to your favorable action.
S_~..~ly,., ~_
David~
September 3, 1997
Mr. Jeff Pomeranz
City Manager
City of Port Angeles
PO Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Dear Mr. Pomeranz,
We, the below signed property owners on Woodhaven Lane would like to
formally inform you of several items of great concern in regards to the ongoing
Woodhaven Lane/Golf Course Road Annexation (LID 215). We have just
recently signed and forwarded on to NTI, documents that grant easements for
the purposes of construction and maintenance of water and sewer lines. These
documents have gone through several variations since they were first proposed
in early August and although finally in an acceptable form, represent an example
of the ongoing frustration and bureaucracy associated with attempting to be
annexed into the City.
We have just received notice from the City in a letter dated September 2,
informing the property owners that due to "easement acquisition difficulties",
construction may be delayed and not completed until summer 1998. We as
property owners take great offense to the insinuation that the construction delay
may be a result of "negotiation for these easements taking longer than usual",
when in fact, this annexation/LID process has been under way since 1993. The
original Lappier annexation request was before the Planning Commission on
June 9,1993 and August 11, 1993 and approved by City Council on August 17,
1993. The LID was formed and approved in late 1996. There is documentation
from the City indicating that design and cost estimates to be complete by
"fall/winter 1994 and construction to commence in spring 1995". The delay in
this whole process has not been the property owners fault and to use difficulties
in obtaining easements etc. as the excuse for construction delays when this
process has been ongoing for over 4 years is ludicrous.
We have several concerns regarding the possible delay, including the following:
· Even if construction is able to proceed shortly, the soil conditions in our area
as you are well aware are not conducive to winter construction. With
construction delays and difficulties, who is going to pay the additional cost
that may be faced by the contractor ?
· The City has already issued a building permit for one new residence on the
promise that sewer would be available when the house was completed in late
1997. How will the City compensate or mitigate the lack of sewer to that
property owner ?
· The City could already be advertising for bids and should have done so. We
understand that construction could not begin until all easements have been
filed, but prudent project management would have lead to concurrent
activities of easement procurement and bid advertisement with award of the
construction after the easements were recorded.
· The City did not need easements on Woodhaven Lane in the first place as
easements for utilities are already recorded and are part of the property.
· The first attempt to gain an easement by the City was in the form of
conveying all rights to the City in the form of a Right of Way agreement.
Subsequent Easement agreement drafts included restrictive language,
limiting owners from using their property.
· The Easement agreements recently completed, represent an issue of
consistency. It seems that the City has negotiated various different
documents, depending on the property owner. The City has a responsibility
to be consistent with it's dealings with it's citizens and this has not occurred
in this case.
· In finding the most economical and reasonable route for sewer lines, it seems
that the City could have found a solution that would have eliminated forcing
some property owners from having to use pumping mechanisms. The cost of
pumps in terms of initial investment as well as long term maintenance could
have been eliminated by finding better routes and securing the proper
easements.
We are still hopeful of having sewer availability in the near future and look for
more positive actions by the City in the future. We have raised our concerns in
hopes that you will understand the frustrations that we have collectively felt. The
fact remains that there are advantages in being incorporated in the City and as a
neighborhood, we want the City of Port Angeles to be as efficient and user
friendly as possible. We appreciate the opportunity to vent our feelings and are
more than willing to meet with you or City staff to review our concerns and work
towards a acceptable solution.
Sincerely,
Woodhaven Lane Property Owners
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
321 E.'~st Fifth Street. PO B~x I 15{) Phone ~360) 417-4gO5 TTY Phone 1360) 417-4645
PUBLIC WORKS Port ,Angeles. x3,'ashinUtOl~ 9h3(52- i 150 Fa,~ ~3601 4. 17-46119 c-mail papwdeptCa_'olympus.net
September 2, 1997
TO: L.I.D. 215 Property Owners
RE: Wastewater L.I.D. 215, Construction Delay
Dear Property Owner:
The construction of L.I.D. 215, which we had anticipated to be well under construction Dy
this time, is being delayed. Completion of the project had been anticipated for this fall.
Prior to being able to advertise for bids and award the project, all easements for sewer
construction and future maintenance must be obtained and recorded. The negotiation for
these easements is taking longer than usual and some redesign is necessary to
accommodate those easements which were not granted. These easement acquisition
difficulties, coupled with loss of critical engineering staff at the City and our Engineering
Consultant, have resulted in the construction delay.
The project design and specifications have been completed, except for last minute
changes related to the easements. We will advertise and award the project when the
easements have been recorded. To the extent weather allows, construction will proceed
as soon as possible and continue until winter conditions mandate a shutdown. In view of
typical winter and spring weather, completion of the project is not likely until early summer
1998.
The portion of the sewer along Melody Lane was completed for the L. I.D. by the developer
of Highland Commons. Sewer connections may be made to this portion upon payment of
connection and system charges. L.I.D. assessments for all property owners within the
L.I.D. will not be made until the L.I.D. is totally completed and the final assessment set at
a public hearing.
We apologize for the delays and resultant inconveniences. Hopefully we can finish up the
easements and advertise the project in time to complete some construction this year.
Very trulr~ours,/
City Engineer
GWK:gk
Copies: J. Pomeranz
J. Pittis
NTI
Disk: N:~P ROJ ECTS~o-O5LIDWIEMOS~}ELAY.GWK
File: 95-05.05
Fl4
463 Lupine Way
Ventura, CA 93001
(805) 648-7448 '
JUN I FJ99
BY FEDERAL EXPRESS
~ , CITYC,LERK, , ,
10 June 1999
Becky J. Upton, CMC
City Clerk
City of Port Angeles
321 E. Fifth Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Dear Ms. Upton:
Hearing Re. Final Assessment Roll For L.I.D. No. 215 - 7 p.m. 15 June 1999
Parcel #14, Tax #063014 140130, Woodhaven Lane
We are delighted that the sewer has been completed, but shocked by the huge increase
in costs. We are, however, very pleased that we will be charged a reduced assessment,
especially as we have already had to pay towards repairs to the road which should
have been made by the sewer contractor.
We are prepared to pay our fair share of the costs. However, we wish to register a
formal objection to any increase in the proposed assessment of $7,101.36 per unit.
In addition, if the assessment is reduced for any unit, we feel it should be reduced for
all units in equal proportions.
Sincerely,
Elmer P. Krogue
Celia M. Krogue
Fl6
Lance & Debra Ruddick
Port Angeles, WA 98362
City of Port Angeles ~ ~ ~J ~]~
Public Works & Utilities Department
Port Angeles, WA 98362 C~TY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY CLERK
June 14, 1999
To Whom it May Concern,
This letter is in response to your letter regarding the final assessment roll for the Upper Golf
Course Road Sewer Local Imporovement District (LID) No. 215, Parcel #35.
We purchased our home at 1937 E. Maddock Road in September of 1998. At that time we were
notified by the seller of an upcoming assessment of $4,000 which was quoted by the Public Works
Department. I contacted Gary Kenworthy, City Engineer, in order to confirm the figure. I was
told that the figure was correct. We made our purchase agreement based upon these facts. The
seller was never notified that the final cost had increased so dramatically from the approved
preliminary estimated cost which a vote was east on.
We run our own business here in Port Angeles. We are required to give estimates on proposed
jobs on a daily basis. It's hard to imagine how an estimate can be increased by 130%. I
understand that long term projections are expected to be adjusted. However that is not the ease
in this situation. Certainly it seems that more information should have been divulged or more
hearings held. What is the purpose of an estimate or a vote based upon that estimate?
We are on an acre and a half with a septic system. We have no need to hook up to a city sewer
line.
This assessment is a huge financial burden which would certainly put us in a terrible situation. It's
hard to believe that we are being asked to pay almost $100 per month for the next ten
years! .... and for something that we don't even need or want. This is our first house. We were
thrilled to move our children into their "own home" in a nice neighborhood.
We are looking forward to finding a solution to this problem. We'll look forward to your
response.
Sincerely, /--, -
Lance & Debra Ruddick
Ag enda Item K.2.C.
June 14, 1999
Cl~ OFPORTANGELES
CI~ CLERK
Port Angeles City Council
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362-0217
RE: Proposed revision of the Urban Growth Area (UGA) east
boundary line, File # CPA 99-01(C).
Dear Council Members:
I am compelled to write you regarding this issue due to my
history of involvement with it. Just a little more than three
years ago, the Cedar Park Residents Association appealed a
similar proposal by Clallam County to the Growth Management
Hearings Board. The City of Port Angeles also appealed the
proposal at that time because they didn't want to expand the UGA.
Now, three years later (after a successful appeal mind you), the
City Planner and the Planning Commission have done a complete 180
degree turn around and are ready to expand the UGA! Better yet,
this is being done with blatant disregard to C.C.C.31.02.250
Urban Growth Area Amendment Process. The City of Port Angeles
has given no consideration to the process and criteria outlined
in this section by Clallam County. Needless to say, it's quite
shocking to see the response given by the City to one disgruntled
property owners request for this change.
Step back for a moment and examine the actions to date by City
Planner, Brad Collins. In his haste to act on this proposed
change, a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) was issued on
May 18, 1999 based on an Environmental Checklist that was totally
inadequate. Subsequently, following the comment period in which
this fact was pointed out, the DNS was withdrawn. On June 4,
1999 an existing Environmental Impact Statement for a "similar"
UGA action issued by Clallam County on June 13, 1995 was adopted.
This action, at best, seems very questionable.
Mr. Collins points to the listing of Puget Sound chinook salmon
as threatened under the Endangered Species Act as the basis for
his support of this proposal. What evidence is there that the
City of Port Angeles can help rebuild this run of fish? Is there
any experts on staff who know anything about the causes for
decline of these fish over time or what steps should be taken to
rebuild this population? Does the City of Port Angeles even know
if there is a water quality problem in Morse Creek? Why is the
City so willing to tackle problems in Morse Creek when they can't
seem to deal with blockages to fish migration, habitat concerns
and water quality issues which abound in every other creek within
the existing UGA! It would appear as though the City has, shall
we say, already "bitten off more than it can chew" at this time.
Port Angeles City Council
June 14, 1999
Page Two
Additionally, Mr. Collins points out that, "there is significant
commercial development occurring east of the current UGA in
conflict with State's Growth Management Plan". If he or anyone
else in City Hall is concerned about this, where were they three
years ago when the zoning for this area was being decided on
after the appeal to the Hearings Board??? There was ample
opportunity for comment on the zoning proposal and the City of
Port Angeles quite obviously,"dropped the ball" at that time.
So, to cover one mistake you are being asked to approve another!
The current UGA boundary is almost two miles from the existing
city limits. Given how the planning has progressed in this area
in the past three years, do you really believe it's prudent to be
adding to the burden at this time? The City Planner and Planning
Commission have had their heads in the sand on this issue to
date. But, it's not too late to save face. The June 11, 1999
Peninsula Daily News front page headlines have already shown you
how the County will deal with this action. I strongly urge you
to stop this practice of what has been, "putting the cart before
the horse". Please spare yourselves and the City of Port Angeles
any further embarrassment over this mess and deny the proposed
revision of the UGA!
Sincerely,
Tim R. Rymer, President
Cedar Park Residents Association
CLALLAM COUNTY
DEP TMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
E)qVmONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION )RT fiuN-GELES, WA 98362-0149
PLANNING DIVISION/WATER QUALITY d U ne 1 §, 1 D99 17-2000, FAX (360) 417-2443
JUN 15 1OcJ0
Mayor Gary Braun
City of Port Angeles CiTY OF PORT ANGELES
321 East 5th Street CITY CLERK
Port Angeles, WA 98362
RE:County's comment on City of Port Angeles Planning Commission Staff Report and Recommendation
CPA99-001 (C)
Dear Mayor Braun:
We have reviewed the background materials on this request, as well as the recent findings from the City Planning
Commission meeting on 06/09/99. The Board of Clallam County Commissioners would like to submit the following
concerns for the City Council to consider in its deliberations on this matter. These should be~d,de, d~to ~e preview, s ·
comments submitted in a letter to Mr. Collins, of your staff, dated 05/18/99 (see attached). ~
in summary, we believe it is premature for the City to be considering any ac~ ogom'~prmpr~Pl nn~''z~l~'~-, /t~
Amendment to change the boundary of the Urban Growth Area (UGA) before this issue is examined through the
process outlined in State law, and the County's adopted Comprehensive Plan. If any action is taken at this stage,
we believe it should only involve the policy question of whether the City is interested in making an application to the
County to amend the boundary according to the process outlined in our Comprehensive Plan (CCC 31.90). This
application will need to address the criteria and policies relating to need and timing. If the outcome of this process
involves an agreement to revise the UGA, then the appropriate Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests can be
considered by both the City and the County. This decision will insure that the elected officials and the public will
have access to the full range of information and options upon which to base their comments and decisions. In order
to properly address these issues, we would like to suggest a joint worksession, perhaps sometime this fall.
For the City to pursue this Comprehensive Plan amendment before the boundary amendment process, criteria and
need is examined, appears premature at best, and potentially flawed from a legal standpoint. As you are also
aware, a SEPA determination is not even needed at this point if the City is simply considering the policy question of
making an application to alter the UGA boundary. If answering this question results in a "yes", then that becomes
the appropriate point to submit a proper environmental checklist and review the range of issues which should be
addressed.
To close, thank you again for considering our comments as a part of your deliberations. The Board of Clallam
County Commissioners is interested in addressing issues such as this with the City, and we hope a joint
worksession discussion will serve as the proper forum to allow us to discuss this issue. In any event, we request
that the decision process and sequence reflect our agreed-upon policies, as well as respecting the concerns of
current County property owners for any decisions to be based on full information disclosure, and with adequate
notice and opportunity to participate in the process.
//
Board of Clallam County Commissioners
c. Jim Rumpeltes, Administrator
Jack Pittis, Acting City Manager
Bob Martin, Director
Andy Meyer, Planning Director, Clallam County
Brad Collins, Planning Director, City of Port Angeles
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: June 15, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Brad Collins, Planning Director
SUBJECT: 1999 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Issue: Four Comprehensive Plan Amendments have been proposed for adoption in June, 1999, per
PAMC Chapter 18.04.
Recommendation: Following the public hearings, approve CPA 99-01(A), (B), (C), and (D),
citing in each case the findings and conclusions of the Planning Commission.
The City's Comprehensive Plan may be reviewed annually, and there are four proposed amendments
to the City's Comprehensive Plan in 1999. First (CPA 99-01A), the Housing Authority of Clallam
County has requested a change in the Land Use Map (Figure 10 as previously amended) for its
Francis Street site from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR) to
reflect the historic and current use of the site and eliminate its nonconforming status which predates
the original zoning of this area. Second (CPA 99-01B), the Public Works Department requests an
amendment of the Circulation Plan Map (Figure 11) to update street classifications consistent with
those designated by City Ordinance and through the Transportation Services and Facilities Plan
(TSFP). Third (CPA 99-01C), the proposal of Mr. and Mrs. Juhasz, property owners, to amend the
Urban Growth Area expand the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area Map (Figure 9) east to include the
R1, P, GC, and RLC zones previously adopted as the UGA by Clallam County. Fourth (CPA. 99-
01D), the Planning Department has proposed an amendment to the Planning Areas Map (Figure 3)
to add a sixth planning area and realign the planning area boundaries for consistency with revisions
being made to census tract boundaries. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of
CPA 99-01 (A), (B), (C), and (D). The CPA approval will not result in any immediate change to the
Comprehensive Plan Figure 9 Port Angeles Urban Growth Area Map but rather initiate a request for
the recommended change to Clallam County, where a separate Comprehensive Plan amendment
process must occur for adopting the UGA change. By authorizing and directing the Planning
Director to request that the Board of Clallam County Commissioners amend the Port Angeles Urban
Growth Area to correspond with the proposed revision of Figure 9, the issue expressed by County
officials about protocol can be resolved.
127
CC Memo CPA 99-01
June 15, 1999
Page 2
Background / Analysis:
The Housing Authority's proposed amendment represents and oversight in the land use designation
that has only come to fight during recent reviews of minor new construction and new services being
provided on the Francis Street site. The public housing development was built before the area was
zoned low density residential, and continuation of its nonconforming use status appears to have been
inadvertent due to lack of permit activity on the site during and after adoption of the Comprehensive
Plan in 1994.
Following adoption of the Circulation Map in the 1994 Comprehensive Plan, the City has adopted
a Transportation Services and Facilities Plan consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies.
However, as streets have been reclassified through subsequent City ordinance, the official maps have
not been updmed to reflect these revisions and need to be. Hence, this amendment would bring the
various City ordinances and maps officially classifying streets into the required consistency with
policies.
When the City adopted its Comprehensive Plan in 1994, Clallam County had not completed nor
adopted a Comprehensive Plan consistent with the Growth Management Act. Earlier the City had
recommended to the County an eastern Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundary following the west rim
of Morse Creek Canyon, and subsequent to the City's adoption of Figure 9 in its Comprehensive Plan
the County adopted an Urban Growth Area for the Port Angeles region which included the area now
proposed as an expansion of the UGA. The City and the Cedar Park Homeowners Association
separately opposed the County's UGA boundary including Morse Creek Canyon and areas adjacent
to Deer Park Road and Buchannan Drive. Before the Growth Management Hearing Board took
action, Clallam County revised the UGA boundary to follow the west rim of Morse Creek Canyon.
However, the commercial zoning was not changed to prohibit commercial development characterized
as urban outside the UGA, and such urban development has been and continues to be permitted in
this rural area.
The recent listing of the Puget Sound chinook salmon as a threatened species under the Endangered
Species Act with Morse Creek identified as habitat could necessitate the need for sanitary sewers in
the Four Seasons Ranch and the Four Seasons Park developments. In regard to the Four Seasons
Neighborhood, the County's 1995 Environmental Impact Statement for the Port Angeles Regional
Comprehensive Plan states, "A smaller urban growth area might exclude this neighborhood but the
neighborhood is already largely built out at urban densities so that environmental harm might be
realized if this neighborhood fi-onting on Morse Creek is never hooked up to city sewer which would
reduce the chance of septage leaking into the creek." However, recent statements by County
Community Development Department and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife officials
suggested that sewers would not be needed to protect fish habitat in Morse Creek. Without inclusion
of the Four Seasons Neighborhood in the UGA, the provision of urban services such as a sanitary
sewer system is not allowed.
Perhaps, the most critical concern is the timing of urban services in areas characterized by urban
development. It is one thing to not plan for urban services in rural areas, because the planning and
design of capital improvements for service areas that do not exist can still be done in the future. It
128
CC Memo CPA 99-01
June 15, 1999
Page 3
to continued occupancy and development and when the services can be provided. Planning,
designing, financing, and constructing capital improvements for an entire service area will take years
and will not be started for areas outside the Urban Growth Area.
Earlier this year, the City and the County planners recommended changes to the census tract
boundaries. To coordinate statistical analysis of demographic data in the future, planning areas
should also be changed to correspond significantly with census tracts and block groups. The
proposed planning area map amendments are based on development patterns and physical features
that separate the community into identifiable neighborhood subareas and logical urban service areas.
Lauridsen Boulevard and Race Street are major arterials which are planned in the Comprehensive
Plan to create even more definable planning area boundaries in the future. To fit within allowable
census tract population ranges and considering future populations that may be annexed into the City,
a new East Planning Area was created east of Race Street, and the North Central Planning Area was
slightly modified to follow the Tumwater Truck Route on the west and Lauridsen Boulevard on the
south.
Attachments:
Comprehensive Plan Ordinance
Comprehensive Plan Figures 3, 9, 10, and 11 as proposed for amendment
Planning Commission 6/9/99 Minutes and 5/26/99 Minutes Excerpt
Planning Department Staff Reports on CPA 99-01 (A-D) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applications
SEPA Reviews: DNS 850, DNS 851, DNS 852, and Adoption of Existing
Environmental Document 854 1995 EIS for Port Angeles Regional Comprehensive
Plan
Letter from Clallam County Planning Director Andy Meyer (CPA 99-01C)
Letters fi.om the Public (CPA 99-01 C)
Letter from Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development
PLANNING\990615\CPA9901
129
130
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
amending Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive
Plan by reclassifying a public housing area south of Lauridsen
Boulevard at Francis Street from low to medium density residential,
by updating the circulation plan map that identifies street classifications,
by proposing a revision of the City's east urban growth boundary,
and by revising the City's Planning Areas to align with census
tract boundaries.
WHEREAS, the City of Port Angeles adopted its present Comprehensive Plan on June
28, 1994, by Ordinance 2818; and
WHEREAS, the City has established a process for amending the Comprehensive Plan
by Ordinance 2858 and Chapter 18.04 of the'Port Angeles Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, SEPA review of the proposed amendments was completed on June 4,
1999; and
WHEREAS, amendment proposals have been received, public notices and hearings
provided, and recommendations made by the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing, has considered the Planning
Commission's recommendations, and has entered its findings and conclusions addressing elements set
forth in PAMC 18.04.060 and in support of adopting the proposed 1999 Comprehensive Plan
amendments; and
WHEREAS, the proposed 1999 Comprehensive Plan amendments have been
determined to be consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan, the Clallam County-Wide
Planning Policy, the Growth Management Act, and the public health, safety, and welfare;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Se, ctioa_L Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby
amended by amending Figure I0 Land Use Map as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, to designate the
public housing area south of Lauridsen Boulevard at Francis Street to be Medium Density Residential
(MDR) rather than Low Density Residential (LDR).
Secliom2. Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby
amended by amending Figure 11 Circulation Plan Map, as set forth in the attached Exhibit B, to revise
and update the designation of street classifications City wide.
Section 3. Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby
amended by adding the Proposed Revision of Figure 9, as set forth in the attached Exhibit C, and by
amending the General Comments Section of the Growth Management Element to read as follows:
1
131
General Comments
This Comprehensive Plan has been developed in accordance with the
requirements of the State Growth Management Act. The City has met all of
the Act's required deadlines for compliance and has participated with Clallam
County, the City of Forks, the City of Sequim, the Tribes and various other
agencies in the development of a County-Wide Planning Policy.
Early in the planning process the City agreed with the County to address only
areas within the current city limits in the City's Comprehensive Plan and to
work with the County on a Joint Comprehensive Plan for the Urban Growth
Area. On April 13, 1993, the Board of Clallam County Commissioners
adopted an Interim Port Angeles Urban Growth Area (see Figure 9). When
completed, the Joint Comprehensive Plan for the Port Angeles Urban Growth
Area will identify land use designations and locations.
leJrne 15, 1999, the.City Council. authom.'zed and directed the Planning Director to
mm~sionem~end the Port Angele,q
Urban Growth Area to correspond with the Proposed Revision of Figure~
Ser, tion~ Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby
amended by amending Figure 3 Planning Area Map, as set forth in the attached Exhibit D, to revise
the Planning Area boundaries to correspond with census tract boundaries.
Section 5 . Said Comprehensive Plan amendments shall be incorporated into the
Comprehensive Plan as kept on file with the City Clerk.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after the date
of publication by summary.
132
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 15th day of June, 1999.
Gary Braun, Mayor
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary
G:\GROUP~ATTYCLRK\ORD99.CP2
133
134
" EXI:IIBIT A
i~i I~-,c=.~ I LAND USE MAP .
136
F. XIIIBIT C
I
I
Pusu~;)w~'s~/xl PROPQSED REVISION TO FIGURE 9
~' I ~ I ~ , , ' .... '~ o-~1
~_ PLo~ D(i~e: x ev son ~ce: x " Fite:x I ~=~ I~
138
140
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
June 9, 1999
7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Fred Hewins, Fred Norton, Jason Robotkay,
Bob King
Members Excused: Mary Craver, Linda Nutter, Dean Reed
Staff Present: Brad Collins, Sue Roberds, Dan McKeen
Public Present: Andy Duran
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner King moved to approve the May 26, 1999, meeting minutes as presented.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Robotkay and passed 3 - 0 with
Commissioner Norton abstaining due to absence.
OLD BUSINESS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS:
C. Revise Urban Growth Area (UGA) east boundary line to Deer Park
Road (generally) and north of Highway 101 along Buchanan Drive. (The
public hearing for this issue was closed at the May 26, 1999, meeting.)
Commissioner Norton noted for the record that he had listened to the tapes of the May 26,
1999, public hearing and reviewed the minutes in order to participate in the final deliberation
for this issue.
Vice Chair Hewins asked Planning Director Collins to review the background for the issue
and the action that is pending.
Commissioner Norton stated that the proposal provides the beginning for future practical
planning efforts in light of ongoing development east of the City's UGA and moved to
approve Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 99-01(C) based on the following
findings and conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01 (C),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port
141
Planning Commission Minutes
June 9, 1999
Page 2
Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. All information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(C),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the
public hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation have been
considered in this decision and is considered a part thereof.
2. The applicants are Norbert and Michelle Juhasz, represented by Linda Nutter and
Craig Miller, and they are requesting an extension of the eastern Port Angeles Urban
Growth Area (Attachment A).
3. The Urban Growth Area (UGA) extension is shown on the Planning Department map
(Attachment B) to include property in and east of Morse Creek Ravine, generally
described as an extension of the existing UGA boundary eastward fi.om south margin
of the BPA power lines to the east margin of the Deer Park Road right-of-way
(including the Four Seasons Ranch and Four Seasons Park developments), then north
to the General Commercial zoning designation, then east following the GC zone
boundary, then north including the GC, RLC, P, and R1 zones, and extending north
to the International (US-Canada) Boundary in the Strait of Juan de Fuca.
4. The subject area is located east of the City's existing UGA including properties in
Sections 5-8 and 17-18, Range 5 West and Township 30 North.
5. Existing land uses within the subject area are as follows:
* Low density residential, public lands, and critical areas within the
Morse Creek Ravine
* Public lands (including a park and a trail), General Commercial
(including a movie theater and a car dealership), and Rural Limited
Commercial (including a restaurant, a gravel pit, and shooting range)
along US 101
* Low density residential west of Deer Park Road and south of the GC
zone
* Low density residential north of the RLC zone
6. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)
under WAC 197-11-340(2) on May 18, 1999, regarding this request. Following the
comment period for this action, the threshold determination was withdrawn, based
on comments received from Clallam County, Four Seasons Ranch, and Cedar Park
Homeowners Association representatives. On June 4, 1999, the SEPA Responsible
Official adopted the existing Environmental Impact Statement for a similar UGA
action issued by Clallam County on June 13, 1995. The City's responsibility under
the State Environmental Policy Act (RCW 43.21 C) are fulfilled by this action.
7. This is an areawide Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and public notice was
provided by legal notice and a paid advertisement in the Peninsula Daily News.
142
Planning Commission Minutes
June 9, 1999
Page 3
8. The Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies identified as being the most relevant to
the proposal were Growth Management Element Goal A, Policies A 1-17, Objective
A-l, Land Use Element Goal A, and Policies A 1-2.
9. The County Port Angeles Region Zoning Map designations the subject area as RI,
P, GC, and RLC.
10. The subject area was included in the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area as originally
adopted by Clallam County.
11. Morse Creek has been identified as habitat for Puget Sound chinook salmon, which
have been listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.
12. The Four Seasons Ranch and the Four Seasons Park residential developments have
experienced waste water system failures, which were a cause for Clallam County to
originally adopt an Urban Growth Area boundary to include the proposed area.
13. Public testimony was given by the Clallam County Planning Director, Four Seasons
Ranch Maintenance Commission President, and Cedar Park Homeowners
Association President opposing CPA 99-01(C).
14. The City of Port Angeles cannot provide and does not plan for urban services such
as sanitary sewer systems outside the Urban Growth Area.
15. The County-Wide Planning Policy identifies policies related to the designation of
urban growth areas, including Urban Growth Area Policy No.3 which requires UGA
to include areas characterized by urban growth adjacent to city boundaries and Urban
Growth Area Policy No. 6 which prohibits lands designated for commercial or
industrial uses which encourage adjacent urban development being located outside
a UGA.
Conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(C),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
heating, the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed
findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby concludes the following:
A. The proposed UGA extension includes areas that are characterized by urban
development and, therefore, appropriately should be part of the Port Angeles Urban
Growth Area.
B. Urban facilities and services needed to serve the proposed area can be provided by
the City of Port Angeles.
C. The listing of Puget Sound chinook salmon in Morse Creek as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act may necessitate sewer system improvements in the subject
area.
143
Planning Commission Minutes
June 9. 1999
Page 4
D. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, specifically those listed in Finding 8.
E. The City of Port Angeles cannot plan or provide urban facilities and services outside
its Urban Growth Area, even though the area is characterized by urban development.
F. Property owners in the subject area have experienced problems that could be served
by urban facilities and services.
G. The proposed amendment is consistent with the County-Wide Planning Policy,
specifically those listed in Finding 15.
H. The proposed expansion of the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area would allow for the
planning of urban services to serve residential and commercial land uses that are
characterized as urban development and is in the public interest.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None.
STAFF REPORTS
As there are no scheduled public hearings for the June 23 meeting, the meeting was
cancelled.
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
None
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
ns, Secretary Fred Hewins, Vice Chair
PREPARED BY: S. Roberds
144
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26, 1999
Page 4
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS:
(A.) Reclassification of area occupied by the Clallam County Housing
Authority - south of Lauridsen Boulevard at Francis Street-
from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential.
Planning Director Collins noted that Comprehensive Plan amendments may be initiated by
a number of sources. Of the four amendments currently under consideration, one is being
sought by an individual, one from the Clallam County Housing Authority, and two from the
City of Port Angeles. He then reviewed the Planning Department's staff report
recommending approval of the proposed amendment. Vice Chair Hewins opened the public
hearing.
Pam Tietz, Executive Director of the Clallam County Housing Authority, 2603 South
Francis, concurred with staff's recommendation and answered general background
questions.
There being no further concerns, Vice Chair Hewins closed the public hearing.
Commissioner King moved to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan
amendment as proposed citing the following findings and conclusions:
Findings:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(A),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port
Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. All information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(A),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the
public hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation have been
considered in this decision and is considered a part thereof.
2. This proposal to amendment the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from LDR to
MDR applies the Clallam County Housing Authority development in the 2600 block
of South Francis Street shown on a map (Attachment A).
3. The subject area has been designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned as
Single Family Residential RS-7.
4. The Mt. Angeles View site has an office and resident service center and multiple
family housing units that have existed and have been in operation without
~ interruption for approximately 50 years (prior to the City of Port Angeles adopting
zoning and a comprehensive plan for the subject area).
145
Planning Commission Minutes
May' 26, 1999
Page 5
5. The existing land use in the subject area and surrounding areas are as follows;
subject area: multiple family residences and auxiliary Housing Authority
facilites and services
north and west: single family residences
east: Peabody Creek Ravine and single family residences and
church
south: Olympic National Park headquarters
6. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)
on May 18, 1999. This action fulfills the City's responsibility under SEPA.
7. Public notice was provided by legal notice published in the Peninsula Daily News
and posted at the site.
8. The Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies idenitified as being the most relevant
to the proposal were Growth Management Element Goal A, Policis A 1, 2, and 17,
Objective A 1, Land Use Element Goal A, and Housing Element Goals A-B.
9. The population growth in Clallam County has exceeded the forecasts from the State
Office of Financial Management since the Growth Management Act was enacted.
If growth is directed to the County's urban growth areas, the City should plan to
maintain exiisting residential neighborhoods and to accommodation new residential
development in urban growth areas adjacent to the East, South Central, and
Southwest Planning Areas.
Conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(A),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
heating, the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed
findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby concludes the following:
A. The proposed land use redesignation recognizes the historic and current use and will
encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the
population., promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and
encourage preservation of existing housing stock.
B. The City has promulgated regulations to protect private property rights. The
proposed land use redesignation will acknowledge the historic and current use and
allow accessory uses that the public housing activity to occur on their site as
developed.
C. The proposal is consistent with the annual review of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
D. The land use redesignation support the existing and planned land use development
of the City.
146
Planning Commission Minutes
Ma), 26, 1999
Page 6
E. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, specifically those listed in Finding 8.
F. The land use redesignation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and
in the public interest.
Commissioner Reed seconded the motion which passed 4 - 0.
(B) Revision to Figure 11 Circulation Plan Map in the
Comprehensive Plan (and Figure 3.2 in the Transportation
Services and Facilities Plan [TSFP]) which identifies street
classifications City wide.
Planning Director Collins reviewed staff's report recommending the Comprehensive Plan
amendment be approved as proposed. The proposed amendment will make the Plan map,
the TSFP map, and past ordinances consistent with one another.
City Engineer Gary Kenworthy, Public Works Department, responded to Commissioner
Reed that although a 1977 ordinance listed streets by classifications, that ordinance was
never codified. The proposed ordinance revises street classifications by current use
amending those that have been downgraded or increased in classification since 1977.
Chair Hewins opened the public hearing. There being no comment from the public, he
closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Reed moved to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Map
amendment citing the following findings and conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(B),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port
Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. All information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(B),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the
public hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation have been
considered in this decision and is considered a part thereof.
2. This proposal applies city-wide, and the street reclassifications are shown on a map
(Attachment A) and listed in a draft ordinance (Attachment B). The proposed
amendments have already been approved in the Transportation Services and
Facilities Plan.
3. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)
on May 18, 1999. This action fulfills the City's responsibility under SEPA.
147
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26. 1999
Page 7
4. This is an areawide Comprehensive Plan Amendment,. and public notice was
provided by lega! notice published in the Peninsula Daily News.
5. The Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies idenitified as being the most relevant
to the proposal were Growth Management. Element Goal A, Policis A 1, 2, 5, 6, 12,
13, 14,15 17, Objective A 1, Land Use Element Goal A, Transportation Element
Goals A-B, Capital Facilities Element Goal A and Policies A 3 and A 5.
Based on the information provided in the May 26, -1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(B),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed
findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby concludes the following:
A. The proposed street reclassifications recognize the existing and planned development
patterns and are supported by land use and transportatioln policies.
B. Urban services/facilities will be planned through the City's Capital Facilities Plan for
the subareas in the City's UGA.
C. The street reclassifications are consistent with the distribution of urban facilities and
services and fit subarea service areas within the City.
D. The slxeet reclassifications are consistent with the comprehensive service and
facilities planning process and meet stated City standards.
E The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, specifically those listed in Finding 5.
F. The proposed street reclassificatons are in the public interest.
Commissioner King seconded the motion which passed 4 - 0.
Revise Urban Growth Area 0JGA) east boundary line to Deer Park
Road (generally) and north of Highway 101 along Buchannan Drive.
Planning Director Collins reviewed the Planning Department's report recommending
approval of the proposal. As the City only has jurisdiction within the City limits, not in the
Urban Growth Area CLIGA), this action would constitute a recommendation to the County
for their approval during the year 2000. The current proposal is only the first step in
enlarging the City's Urban Growth Area (UGA) and is intending to show support by the City
for such a move. The City did not sUpPort an extension of the UGA to this area in 1995
when it was first proposed by the County. The process could take several years. The City
reviews its Comprehensive Plan in May of each year. The County reviews its Plan after the
first of January.
The County feels that this amendment process is premature until the County raises the issue
of amendment to the UGA. The City sees it as a policy determination. The County's
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26, 1999
Page 8
amendment process does not allow for individuals to request a change in the UGA.
Therefore, this could be viewed as the applicant not requesting that the County change the
UGA boundary, but requesting that the City change its previous recommendation via the
Comprehensive Plan process which recognizes the City's policy regarding where the UGA
boundary should be. As such, it is an appropriate review question. The City would not
change its Comprehensive Plan until the County concurs with the amendment.
Significant commercial development is occurring east of the City's Urban Growth Area
(UGA) in conflict with the State's Growth Management Plan. There are no service providers
that can provide infrastructure needed for continued development except the City. Water is
currently being purchased from the City and resold to the area through the P.U.D. The
amendment would allow the bulk of the commercial development occurring east of the
City's UGA boundary to at some time in the future, be included in the City, and would allow
the City to begin planning for that incorporation. The City would not consider annexation
until the needed infrastructure could be provided within a reasonable period of time.
Letters from Andy Duran, President of the Four Seasons Maintenance Division, and Larry
Byrne, a resident of the Cedar Park area were received and noted.
Vice Chair Hewins opened the public hearing.
Craig Miller, 230 East Fifth Street, represented the applicants. He agreed with staff's report
and analysis. Over the past 5 to 6 years the Juhaszs have attempted to develop a property
located west of Buchannan Drive without success. It is anticipated that even if this
amendment is approved, annexation with the extension of services could take 10 to 15 years.
One side (south) of Highway 101 is currently developing as heavy commercial where the
opposite side where the Juhasz property is located is being held to status quo. The project
described as the "Deer Park Gateway" would allow the area to serve as the gateway to Port
Angeles and would therefore be logical as being within the City's UGA.
The County originally proposed the City's eastern UGA to be where the proposal suggests.
The City opposed the designation and over a period of time, the County moved the line west
to the current UGA boundary at the west rim of Morse Creek Canyon. Intense commercial
development was not discouraged with that designation. Approval of the proposal would
incorporate those areas that are cun'ently developing with heavy commercial into the City's
UGA which would be in compliance with the State's GMA guidelines.
Andy Duran, President of the Four Seasons Maintenance Commission, 673 Strait View
Drive, stated that many people in the Four Seasons Ranch believe that annexation to the City
would really benefit the Ranch. City services would be welcome by the residents. However,
the Ranch residents are very concerned that if the Juhasz property is annexed to the City,
potential runoff from parking lots and more intensive residential development could be very
detrimental to the community. The potential for landslides and seepage from up hill effluent
is a concern. He will be talking to the County regarding whether the Ranch community is
for or against this proposal at a later date.
149
Planning Commission Minutes
Ma), 26, 1999
Page 9
Tim Rymer, 412 Cedar Park Drive, spoke as President of the Cedar Park Homeowner's
Association, expressed strong objection to the proposal even as a policy decision. There is
nothing new in the development pattern in this area - no surprises. Five years ago, the City
agreed that the UGA boundary should be the west boundary. The City has plenty of area that
is designated within the UGA that has not been annexed. There is no justification to change
the UGA because one commercial property owner cannot develop in a manner that is
acceptable to him. The Cedar Park Drive Homeowner's Association appealed the County's
initial proposal to set the City's eastern UGA boundary as the east rim of Morse Creek ravine
and are still opposed to such a determination. Services in the area are adequate, there is no
justification for this amendment.
Jane Floyd, 93 Sea View Drive, was not opposed to the proposal but wanted all of Four
Seasons Ranch to be treated the same, either all in or out of the UGA.
Andy Meyer, County Planning Director, 223 East Fourth Street, indicated that the City's
Planning Director has characterized the issue relatively well. The County is still in
disagreement on a couple of points. The County's overall concerns are with the process
which is premature. The issue that is appropriately before the City is whether or not the City
is interested in making application to the County to pursue a UGA boundary amendment.
The County's Plan outlines the UGA amendment process that includes several criteria to
amend the boundary that need to be addressed before the City issue of amending its
Comprehensive Plan. He did not feel that the City should be dealing with a SEPA threshold
at this time. The SEPA checklist is inadequate and erroneous. A policy question doesn't
necessitate a SEPA threshold determination. If the City wishes to pursue the proposal as an
amendment to its Comprehensive Plan, the SEPA checklist should be revised in detail.
A Comprehensive Plan Map change should not occur until after the City makes application
for a UGA boundary amendment application following the County's criteria, and after a
thorough analysis of the reasons for such a proposed change including a thorough SEPA
review.
In response to Commissioner Reed, Director Meyer stated that the County is not saying it
is inappropriate to look at an amendment to the UGA boundary. He is concerned that this
is a policy issue at this point and not an amendment.
In response to Commissioner Reed, Tim Rymer, as an employee of the Washington State
Department ofFish and Wildlife, stated that the County has a more clear understanding of
the Morse Creek watershed needs and fish restoration than does City staff.
Mr. Meyer stated in response to Commissioner Reed that in actuality the City's adoption of
a policy directive to look at amendment to the UGA probably would accelerate a UGA
amendment process at the County.
Andy Duran, reminded the Commission that it took about three years of contant effort to
establish a good working with the Elwha Tribe, Department of Fisheries, and with the
County. They have a good working relationship and he expects it to continue.
150
Planning CommissionMinutes
May 26. 1999
Page 10
Craig Miller, agreed that the County works best with an application pending. The City's
current amendment application would assuredly bring the matter to the County's attention.
It may be a chicken and the egg question because there are two amendment processes to
follow through with and they do not coincide time wise. It may be appropriate to leave the
current issue pending while a County application is processed.
The Juhasz proposal for development was permitted under two different permits at two
different times. Following the UGA final designation, the property ended up outside the area
that permits the proposal they have. Given the fact that the County originally proposed this
area as being in the UGA, the fact that the Juhasz are still hanging and interested in
development, and the City is not in conflict with the process, the process should be favorably
considered.
Planning Director Collins corrected earlier testimony that Morse Creek is not the eastern
UGA boundary. The western rim of the Morse Creek Canyon is the current eastemUGA
boundary. He agreed that the County can deal with fish problems more adequately than the
City. However, the County is not in a position to deal with waste water treatment problems.
There is no challenge to the fact that the County will make the final decision on this issue,
but this is a method designed to put that question before the County for consideration. The
City would not object to turning over the SEPA process to the County if the County desires
to be lead agency.
There being no further testimony, Vice Chair Hewins closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Reed did not see that there is a valid need at this time to amend the boundary
which can be supported. The current development and protection of Morse Creek Watershed
can be dealt with by the County. There is no lack of developable area within the current
UGA at this time.
Commissioner Hewins views this as a proposal for the City to begin to bring the area into
its planning process for future development, perhaps 10 to 15 years hence. Annexation is
a long term thing. The proposal would not change growth patterns until annexation is
approved at a future date. The amendment would allow the City's plans to be more far
reaching for future development.
Commissioner King agreed with Commissioner Hewins analysis that this is a very
preliminary position.
Commissioner Reed felt that this is the first step toward annexation at some future date. The
area under consideration may not be desirable for higher density development. A large group
of property owners are not asking for this change, but a single applicant making a request for
future commercial gain.
Commissioner King moved to recommend approval of the amendment as a policy to
the City Council. The motion died for lack of a second.
151
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26, 1999
Page 11
Commissioner Reed moved to continue the item to the June 9 meeting and directed
staff to prepare alternate findings and conclusions. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Robotkay and passed 4 - 0.
(C) Revision of the City's Planning Areas defined in the
Comprehensive Plan to align with Census Tract Boundaries.
Planning Director Collins presented the staff's report recommending approval of the
proposed amendment. Vice Chair Hewins opened the public hearing.
There being no one present to speak, Vice Chair Hewins closed the public heating.
Commissioner Robotkay moved to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to the City Council with the following findings and conclusions:
Findings:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(D),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port
Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. All information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(D),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the
public heating, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation have been
considered in this decision and is considered a part thereof.
2. This proposal applies city-wide, and the botmdaries are shown on a revised Planning
Areas Map (Attachment A).
3. The City and Clallam County staff working on the Census 2000 determined that there
was an oppommity to change the Port Angeles area census tracts to reflect changes
in the development pattern and identifiable boundaries that have occurred over the
considerable time since the Census Tracts were last revised. The primary change in
the Census Tract boundaries was to conform to the Planning Area boundaries, and
where a Census Tract boundary requirement was paramount the Planning Area
boundary was modified.
4. The 1994 Comprehensive Plan for the City of Port Angeles established five Planning
Areas that could be used in identifying different areas of the community and potential
neighborhood subareas.
5. To fit within allowable Census Tract population ranges and considering future
populations that may be annexed into the City, a new East Planning Area based on
population distributions east of Race Street was created, and the North Central
Planning Area was slightly modified to follow the Tumwater Truck Route on the
west and Lauridsen Boulevard on the south.
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26. 1999
Page 12
6. The boundaries anticipate inclusion of the Urban Growth Areas in the future of the
East, South Central, and Southwest Planning Areas.
7. The primary boundaries between Planning Areas are major arterials and the marine
bluff.
8. Previously there was no east boundary for the North Central Planning Area, other
than the City Limits, which included subareas that were not well connected to the
North Central neighborhood subareas.
9. Lauridsen Boulevard and Race Street are planned in the Comprehensive Plan as
major arterials.
10. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)
on May 18, 1999. This action fulfills the City's responsibility under SEPA.
11. This is an areawide Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and public notice was
provided by legal notice published in the Peninsula Daily News.
12. The Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies idenitified as being the most relevant
to the proposal were Growth Management Element Goal A, Policies A 1-17,
Objective A-l, Land Use Element Goal A, Policies A 1-2, Land Use Element Goal
B, Land Use Element Goal C, Policy C 1, Land Use Element Goal E, and Policy E
7.
Conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(D),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed
findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby concludes the following:
A. Since the Planning Areas and Census Tracts were nearly coincidental, it rational to
modify each to be even more coincidental for future statistical analysis purposes.
B. Neighborhood subareas such as above and below the Boulevard between the North
Central and South Central and west of the 8th Street bridges and north of Airport and
Lincoln Park for the Northwest Planning Area are fairly easy to identify.
C. The new boundary at Race Street (and Heart of the Hills Parkway) is okay south of
Lauridsen Boulevard but less so north of there. An alternate North Central boundary
of Lauridsen Boulevard east to White's Creek Ravine does not work for Census
Tracts revisions within the existing City Limits. Since Lauridsen Boulevard and
Race Street are planned in the Comprehensive Plan as major arterials, it is expected
that they will be even more definable Planning Area boundaries in the future.
153
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26. 1999
Page 13
D. The proposed Planning Area revisions follow the development pattems and physical
features that separate the community into identifiable neighborhood subareas and
logical urban service areas.
E The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, specifically those listed in Finding 12.
F. The revised Planning Areas are in the public interest.
Commissioner Reed seconded the motion which passed 4 - 0.
1 54
FILE
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 26, 1999
TO: Planmng Commission
FROM: Planning Department
FILE #: CPA 99-01(A)
APPLICANT: Clallam County Housing Authority
OWNER: Clallam County Housing Authority
LOCATION: 2600 Block of South Francis Street between Lauridsen Boulevard and Park
Avenue
REQUEST: Update the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map by designating the Housing
Authority area as Medium Density Residential (MDR).
BACKGROUND:
Proposed Project
A proposal to designate the Housing Authority of the County of Clallam public housing
development area as Medium Density Residential (MDR) rather than Low Density Residential
(LDR) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The new designation is intended to
acknowledge the historic and current use.
Location and Existing Development
The subject area is located south ofLaufidsen [Ioulewd and north of Park Avenue in the 2600 Block
of South Francis Street.
The existing land use in the subject area and surrounding areas are as follows;
subject area: multiple family residences and auxiliary Housing Authority facilites
and services
north and west: single family residences
east: Peabody Creek Ravine and single family residences and church
south: Olympic National Park headquarters
155
cia ~-ol(A) Pqe 2
DISCUSSION:
Environmental Review
The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on May 18, 1999.-
This action fulfills the City's responsibility under SEPA.
Comprehensive Plan
The Comprehensive Plan establishes the long range goals and policies of the City. It is the basis upon
which City officials are to make land use decisions. Any project proposed in the City must be
consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Designation
The subject area has been designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned as Single Family
Residential RS-7.
Goals and Policies
The Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Policies have been reviewed with regards to the proposed
application and the following policies appear to be the most relevant to the proposal.
Growth Management Element, Goal.4. To manage growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial
to the community as a whole, is sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals and is consistent with
the State of Washington's Growth Management Act.
Growth Management Element, Goal`4, Policy No. 1. In all its actions and to the extent consistent
with the provisions of this comprehensive plan, the City shall strive to implement the following goals
of the State Growth Management `4ct:
a. Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and
services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner.
b. Reduce sprawl Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling,
low-density development.
c. Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on
regional pr/orities and coordinated w/th county and city comprehensive plans.
d. Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the
population. Promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage
preservation of existing housing stock.
e. Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the region that is
consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity, especially for
unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, and encourage growth in areas experiencing
insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the region's natural resources,
public services cmd public facilities.
156
f. Property rights. Private properly shall not be taken for public use without just compensation
having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary attd
discriminatory actions.
g. Permits. Applications for both state and local government permits shouM be processed in-
a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability.
h. Natural resource industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource-based industries,
including productive timber, agricultural, and. fisheries industries.
i. Open space and recreation. Encourage the retention of open space and development of
recreational opportunities, conserve .fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural
resource lands and water, and develop parks.
j. Em,ironment. Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including
air and water quality, and the availability of water.
k. Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the
planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to
reconcile conflicts.
Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to
support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development
is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally
established minimum standards.
m. Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites and structures
that have historical or archaeological signifcance.
The proposed land use redesignation recognizes the historic and current use and will
encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population.,
promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of
existing housing stock.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 2. The Port Angeles Urban Growth Area
(PA UGA) should be established based at a minimum upon land use demand as determined by the
Clallam County 20-year population forecast for Clallam County and specified sub-areas, so long
as the county-wide forecast is not less than the most recent forecasts available from the State Office
of Financial Management.
The population growth in Clallam County has exceeded the forecasts from the State Office
of Financial Management since the Growth Management Act was enacted. If growth is
directed to the County's urban growth areas, the City should plan to maintain exiisting
residential neighborhoods and to accommodation new residential development in urban
growth areas adjacent to the East, South Central, and Southwest Planning Areas.
157
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 17. All development regulations shall be
promulgated with due regard for private property rights in order to avoid regulatory takings or
violation of due process and to protect property rights of landowners from arbitrary and
discriminatory actions.
The City has promulgated regulations to protect private property rights. The proposed land
use redesignation will acknowledge the historic and current use and allow accessory uses that
the public housing activity to occur on their site as developed.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Objectivel. The City will continue its efforts to comply in
a timely manner with the requirements of the State Growth Management Act.
The proposal is consistent with the annual review of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Land Use Element, Goal A. To guide current and future development within the City in a manner
that provides certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessa~ to meet the
challenges and opportunities of the future.
The land use redesignation support the existing and planned land use development of the
City.
Housing Element, Goal A. To improve the variety, quality, availability, and affordability of housing
opportunities in the City of Port Angeles.
Housing Element, Goal B. To participate with Clallam County and other entities in programs to
increase the availability and affordability of public assisted housing and rental units as well as other
affordable housing opportunities.
The land use redesignation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and in the
public interest.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of
CPA 99-01(A) to the City Council based on the following findings and conclusions.
Findings
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, StaffRcport for CPA 99-01(A), (including
all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public hearing, and the
Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission
hereby finds that:
1. All information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(A), (including
all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public hearing, and
the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation have been considered in this decision
and is considered a part thereof.
158
C~A 99.0 I(A) P~ ~
2. This proposal to amendment the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from LDR to MDR
applies the Clallam County Housing Authority development in the 2600 block of South
Francis Street shown on a map (Attachment A).
3. The subject area has been designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned as Single'
Family Residential RS-7.
4. The Mt. Angeles View site has an office and resident service center and multiple family
housing units that have existed and have been in operation without interruption for
approximately 50 years (prior to the City of Port Angeles adopting zoning and a
comprehensive plan for the subject area).
5. The existing land use in the subject area and surrounding areas are as follows;
subject area: multiple family residences and auxiliary Housing Authority facilites
and services
north and west: single family residences
east: Peabody Creek Ravine and single family residences and church
south: Olympic National Park headquarters
6. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on May
18, 1999. This action fulfills the City's responsibility under SEPA.
7. Public notice was provided by legal notice published in the Peninsula Daily News and posted
at the site.
8. The Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies idenitified as being the most relevant to the
proposal were Growth Management Element Goal A, Policis A 1, 2, and 17, Objective A 1,
Land Use Element Goal A, and Housing Element Goals A-B.
9. The population growth in Clallam County has exceeded the forecasts from the State Office
of Financial Management since the Growth Management Act was enacted. If growth is
directed to the County's urban growth areas, the City should plan to maintain exiisting
residential neighborhoods and to accommodation new residential development in urban
growth areas adjacent to the East, South Ccntral, and Southwcst Planning Arcas.
Conclusions
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01 (A), (including
all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public hearing, the Planning
Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed findings, the City of Port Angeles
Planning Commission hereby concludes the following:
A. The proposed land use redesignation recognizes the historic and current use and will
encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population.,
promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of
existing housing stock.
159
CPA ~0 ] (A) ~ 6
B. The City has promulgated regulations to protect private property rights. The proposed land
use redesignation will acknowledge the historic and current use and allow accessory uses that
the public housing activity to occur on their site as developed.
C. The proposal is consistent with the annual review of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
D. The land use redesignation support the existing and planned land use development of the City.
E The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan,
specifically those listed in Finding 8.
F. The land use redesignation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and in the
public interest.
This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council.
CPA9901.A
160
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Please Note deadline for application is March 31, 1999. ] ~ 3
PORT ~NGELE$
1. APPLICANT Housing Authority of the County of Clallam ~l~,
ADDRESS 2603 South Francis Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362
DAYTIME PHONE (360) 452-7631, EXTENSION 22
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT/MAP CHANGE (Be specific noting
Plan policy citations.) The Housing Authority of the County of Clallam proposes to
make a change in the Comprehensive Plan Map for its site located near the south end of
Francis Street (see Attachment A). Thc overall campus contains approximately 18 acres
and is currently designated Low Density Residential (LDR) on the Comprehensive Plan
map. The Housing Authority would like the overlying Comprehensive Plan designation
for this site to be changed to Residential Medium Density (RMD).
3. JUSTIFICATION/REASON FOR CHANGE: The Housing Authori_ty of the
County of Clallam recently applied for a building permit to expand its office facili _ty at
2603 South Francis Street Location (Mt. Angeles View). In reviewing the application,
the Planning Department noted the site's RS-7 zoning and the overlying Comprehensive
Plan Residential Low-Density designation were inconsistent with the existing use of the
property.
Many of the programs that the Housing Authority operates provide more than iust
housing: we also provide on-site services such as daycare, recreation, social services, etc.
These on-site services are critical to successful operation of Public Housing, Without the
on-site services, thc neighborhood could potentially deteriorate because families are not
receiving necessary counseling and services to help them solve crisis situations.
Compare the intended use of Low Density Residential (for the development of single
family homes up to 9 units per net acre) with the intended use of Medium Density
Residential (development of multiple residential unit proiects up to 15 units per net acre),
and it appears that the mom appropriate designation for the Comprehensive Plan map is
the latter.
The Mt. Angeles View site has an office and resident service center that has been
operated without interruptions for approximately 50 years (prior to the City of Port
Angeles adopting zoning codes and the comprehensive plan). It is unclear why the
existing Port Angeles Zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations were adopted
considering thc preexisting property_ configuration; however, wc believe that now we arc
aware of the conflict, it must be corrected.
NO. 850
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE
RCW Chapter 197-11-340
Description of Proposal: A proposal to designate a public housing development as Medium.
Density Residential (MDR) rather than Low Density Residential (LDR) on the City's
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The MDR designation is intended to acknowledge the historic
and current use and to allow for accessory uses that benefit the public housing activity to occur
within the development site.
Applicant: CLALLAM COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Location of Proposal (including street address, if any): 2600 Block of South Francis Street
between Lauridsen Boulevard and Park Avenue.
Lead Agency: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable sig~ficant adverse
impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and
other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
[ ] This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by
at which time the DNS may be retained, modified, or withdrawn.
[ ] There is no comment period for this DNS.
[ XX] This DNS is issued per WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period.
May l 8,1999 ~ ~1~ ,0_~.
Date Brad Collins, Planning Director
You may appeal this determination to the Port Angeles City Council through the Planning Department, 321
East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362, by submitting such written appeal to the Planning Department
no later than~lmxe~2,_l~9~ You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible
Official: Brad Collins, Planning Director, Port Angeles Planning Department, 321 East Fifth Street, Port
Angeles, WA 98362, phone (360)417-4750.
Pub: 5/21/99
Post: 5/18/99
Mail: 5/18/99
162
........ -'T ................. ~ "hr
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 26, 1999
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
FILE #: CPA 99-01(B)
APPLICANT: City of Port Angeles
OWNER: City-wide
LOCATION: City-wide
REQUEST: Update the Comprehensive Plan Circulation Plan Map and the Transportation
Services and Facilities Plan Map (TSFP) to correctly identify certain street
classifications within the City limits.
BACKGROUND:
Proposed Project
Revision to Figure 11 Circulation Plan Map in the Comprehensive Plan (and Figure 3.2 in the TSFP)
which identifies street classifications City-wide. The specific reclassifications are shown on the Staff
Report map (Attachment A) and are listed in a draft ordinance (Atttachment B). The proposed
amendments have already been approved in the Transportation Services and Facilities Plan but have
not been updated on the two official maps.
Location and Existing Development
The entire City is covered by the proposed street reclassificatiolns.
DISCUSSION:
Environmental Review
The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on May 18, 1999.
This action fulfills the City's responsibility under SEPA.
CPA 990 I(B) Pa~ 2
Comprehensive Plan
The Comprehensive Plan establishes the long range goals and policies of the City. It is the basis upon
which City officials are to make land use decisions. Any project proposed in the City must be
consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Designation
Not applicable.
Goals and Policies
The Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Policies have been reviewed with regards to the proposed
application and the following policies appear to be the most relevant to the proposal.
Growth Management Element, Goal A. To manage growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial
to the community as a whole, is sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals and is consistent with
the State of ~ashington's Growth Management Act.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 1. In all its actions and to the extent consistent
with the provisions of this comprehensive plan, the City shah strive to implement the following goals
of the State Growth Management Act:
a. Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and
services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner.
b. Reduce sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling,
low-density development.
c. Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on
regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans.
at. Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the
population. Promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage
preservation of existing housing stock.
e. Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the region that is
consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity, especially for
unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, and encourage growth in areas experiencing
insufficient economic growth, aH within the capacities of the region's natural resources,
public services and public facilities.
f Property rights. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation
twtving been made. Tbe property rights of latdowners shall be protected from arbitrary and
discriminatory actions.
g.Permits. Applications for both state and local government permits shouM be processed in
a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability.
164
CPA 9~-OI(B) Pa~ ~
h. Natural resource industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource-based industries,
including productive timber, agricultural, and fisheries industries.
i. Open space and recreation. Encourage the retention of open space and development of
recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural'
resource lands and water, and develop parks.
j. Environment. Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quafity of life, including
air and water quality, and the availability of water.
Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the
planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to
reconcile conflicts.
L Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to
support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development
is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally
established minimum standards.
m. Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites and structures
that have historical or archaeological significance.
The proposed street reclassifications recognize the existing and planned development patterns
and are supported by land use and transportatioln policies.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 2. The Port Angeles Urban Growth Area
(PA UGA) shouM be established based at a minimum upon land use demand as determined by the
Clallam County 20-year population forecast for Clallam County and specified sub-areas, so long
as the county-wide forecast is not less than the most recent forecasts available from the State Office
of Financial Management.
The population growth in Clallam County has exceeded the forecasts from the State Office
of Financial Management since the Growth Management Act was enacted. If growth is
directed to the County's urban growth areas, the City should plan to maintain exiisting
residential neighborhoods and to accommodation new residential development in urban
growth areas adjacent to the East, South Central, and Southwest Planning Areas.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 5. Urban services~facilities shall be provided
consistent with the Capital Facilities Element.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 6. The City shouM work with the County and
other service providers to determine the appropriate levels of service for such facilities and services
arm to ensure consistency between service provision within the City, the PA UGA, and the County.
Urban services/facilities will be planned through the City's Capital Facilities Plan for the
subareas in the City's UGA.
165
CPA 99-01 (B) Page
Growth Management Element, Goal.4, Poficy No. 12. Urban services to be provided within the
PA UGA shouM include, at a minimum, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste collection/disposal
systems, water systems, urban roads and pedestrian facilities, street cleaning services, transit
systems, stormwater systems, police and fire and emergency services systems, electrical and
communication systems, school and health care facilities, and neighborhood and/or community'
parks.
Growth Management Element, Goal`4, Policy No. 13. The City shouM be the ultimate provider of
urban services within the City limits and the P,4 UGA for those services the City provides except to
the extent otherwise provided in a UGA Urban Services and Development .4greement that is reached
pursuant to the County-Wide Planning Policy.
Growth Management Element, GoaI A, Policy No. 14. Urban services~facilities for which the City
is the ultimate provider should be provided and constructed to meet the design and construction
standards of the City.
Growth Management Element, Goal .4, Policy No. 15. The City or service provider should
demonstrate the financial capability for continued operation of the facility following construction.
The street reclassifications are consistent with the distribution of urban facilities and services
and fit subarea service areas within the City.
Growth Management Element, Goal `4, Policy No. 17. All development regulations shall be
promulgated with due regard for private property rights in order to avoid regulatory takings or
violation of due process and to protect property rights of landowners from arbitrary and
discriminatory actions.
The City has promulgated regulations to protect private property rights. The proposed street
reclassifications will help neighborhood subareas maintain existing development patterns.
Growth Management Element, Goal.4, Objectivel. The City will continue its efforts to comply in
a timely manner with the requirements of the State Growth Management ,4ct.
The proposal is consistent with the annual review of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
l_and Use Element, Goal,4. To guide current and future development within the City in a manner
that provides certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the
challenges and opportunities of the future.
The street reclassifications support the existing and planned land use development of the City.
Transportation Element, Goal A. To develop a coordinated, multimodal transportation system
which serves all areas of the city and all types olf users in a safe, economical, and efficient manner.
Transportation Element, Goal B. To improve circulation patterns across the community.
166
CPA 99-01(B) P~g~ ~
Capital Facilities Element, Goal ~1. To provide and maintain safe and financially feasible urban
services and capital facilities at or above stated lewis of service to all City residents and the general
public.
Capital Facilities Element, Goal A, Policy 3. The City shall develop individual comprehensive'
service and facility plans for the following utilities and/or services: ... streets, bikeways attd
pedestrian walkways,...
Capital Facilities Element, Goal ~l, Policy 5. Comprehensive service and facility plans shall be
consistent with the general level of service standards established in the Comprehensive Plan and
shall establish detailed level of service standards which, at a minimum, meet all local, state and
federal health and safety requirements. Each platt may also establish desired level of service
standards and shall include an inventory of current facilities, measurements of current and future
service catn2cities, the determination of future service and facility improvements necessary to serve
the twenty year vision of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, and a financial feasibility
analysis.
The street reclassifications are consistent with the comprehensive service and facilities
planning process and meet stated City standards.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA 99-
01 (B) to the City Council based on the following findings and conclusions.
Findings
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, StaffReport for CPA 99-01(B), (including
all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public hearing, and the
Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Pon Angeles Planning Commission
hereby finds that:
1. All information provided in the May 26, 1999, StaffReport for CPA 99-01(B), (including all
of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public hearing, and the
Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation have been considered in this decision and
is considered a par~ thereof.
2. This proposal applies city-wide, and the street reclassifications are shown on a map
(Attachment A) and listed in a draft ordinance (Attachment B). The proposed amendments
have already been approved in the Transportation Services and Facilities Plan.
3. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on May
18, 1999. This action fulfills the City's responsibility under SEPA.
4. This is an areawide Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and public notice was provided by legal
notice published in the Peninsula Daily News.
167
C~'A ~9-O~fS) ~se6
5. The Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies idenitified as being the most relevant to the
proposal were Growth Management Element Goal A, Policis A 1, 2, 5, 6, 12, 13, 14,15 17,
Objective A 1, Land Use Element Goal A, Transportation Element Goals A-B, Capital
Facilities Element Goal A and Policies A 3 and A 5.
Conclusions
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff'Report for CPA 99-01(B), (including
all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public hearing, the Planning
Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed findings, the City of Port Angeles
Planning Commission hereby concludes the following:
A. The proposed street reclassifications recognize the existing and planned development patterns
and are supported by land use and transportatioln policies.
B. Urban services/facilities will be planned through the City's Capital Facilities Plan for the
subareas in the City's UGA.
C. The street reclassifications are consistent with the distribution of urban facilities and services
and fit subarea service areas within the City.
D. The street reclassifications are consistent with the comprehensive service and facilities
planning process and meet stated City standards.
E The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan,
specifically those listed in Finding 5.
F. The proposed street reclassificatons are in the public interest.
This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council.
CPA9901.B
168
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, updating the
classifications and designations of City streets, repealing Ordinance 1928,
and adopting a new Chapter 11.02 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. A new Chapter 11.02 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code is hereby adopted
to read as follows:
Chapter 11.02
STREET CLASSIFICATIONS
Sections:
11.02.010 Purpose
11.02.020 Definitions
11.02.030 Principal Arterials
11.02.040 Minor Arterials
11.02.050 Collector Arterials
11.02.010 Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to classify and designate streets
within the City of Port Angeles as either principal arterials, minor arterials, collector arterials, or
access streets, consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Circulation Plan and with the State-
wide National Functional Classification System.
11.02.020 Definitions.
A. "Access streets" shall include all streets within the City, which are not designated
in this Chapter as principal, minor, or collector arterials and which generally have
the following characteristics:
1. Permit direct access to abutting land uses;
2. Connect to higher class street systems;
3. Have a iow level of mobility;
4. Discourage through traffic movement;
5. Consist often to thirty percent of travel volume and sixty-five to eighty
percent of street mileage.
169
B. "Arterials" or "arterial highways" shall include, for the purposes of RCW
46.04.030 and RCW 47.04.010(2), in all courts, but not by limitation, the prin~
pal arterials, minor arterials, and collector arterials designated in this Chapter.
C. "Collector arterials" shall include those streets designated in PAMC 11.02.050,
which streets generally have the following characteristics:
1. Provide land access and street circulation within residential, commercial,
and industrial areas;
2. Distribute trips fi.om the arterial system to ultimate destinations and vice
versa;
3. Consist of five to ten percent of travel volume and five to ten percent of
street mileage.
D. "Minor arterials" shall include those streets designated in PAMC 11.02.040,
which streets generally have the following characteristics:
1. Interconnect and augment principal arterials;
2. Serve trips of shorter distance and lower level of mobility than principal
arterials;
3. Have more emphasis on land access;
4. Do not usually penetrate identifiable neighborhoods;
5. Consist of five to forty percent of travel volume and five to twent,'
percent of street mileage.
E. "Principal arterials" shall include those streets designated in PAMC 11.02.030,
which streets generally have the following characteristics:
1. Serve major centers of activity and highest traffic volume corridors;
2. Serve most trips entering or leaving urban area;
3. Serve significant intra-urban travel between major suburban or business
districts;
4. Have fully and/or partially controlled access;
5. Consist of forty to sixty-five percent of travel volume and five to ten
percent of street mileage.
11.02.030 Principal Arterials. The following streets and pans of streets within the City
are hereby designated as principal arterial streets:
1. Front Street from Golf Course Road to Lincoln Street.
2. First Street from Lincoln Street to east City limits.
3. Lincoln Street from Front Street to Laufidsen Boulevard.
4. Lauridsen Boulevard from Lincoln Street to Cherry Street.
5. State Highway 101 from Cherry Street to west City limits.
6. Race Street from Front Street to Mt. Angeles Road.
-2-
170
11.02.040 Minor Arterials. The following streets and parts of streets within the City
are hereby designated as minor arterial streets:
1. 8t" Street from Race Street to "C" Street.
2. "C" Street from 8"~ Street to Lauridsen Boulevard.
3. Lauridsen Boulevard from Lincoln Street to Race Street.
4. Front Street from Lincoln Street to Cherry Street.
5. First Street from Lincoln Street to Valley Street.
6. Marine Drive from Cherry Street to Tumwater Track Route (SR-117).
7. Tumwater Track Route (SR-117) from Marine Drive to south City limits.
8. Golf Course Road from First Street to Bonneville Power Administration
easement.
9. Future White's Creek crossing from Race Street to Golf Course Road.
11.02.050 Collector Arterials. The following streets and parts of streets within the City
are hereby designated as collector arterial streets:
1. Chambers Street from Front Street to 8~ Street.
2. Golf Course Road from Bonneville Power Administration easement to
south City limits.
3. Mt. Angeles Road from Heart of Hills parkway to south City limits.
4. Ennis Street from former Rayonier mill site to Lauridsen Boulevard.
5. Eunice Street from 8th Street to Lauridsen Boulevard.
6. Fairmont Avenue from SR-101 to Lauridsen Boulevard.
7. Peabody Street from Front Street to Ahlvers Road.
8. Old Mill Road from Ahlvers Road to south City limits.
9. Laurel Street from Lauridsen Boulevard to Ahlvers Road.
10. Cherry Street from 2"~ Street to 15m Street.
11. Valley Street from First Street to 2"~ Street.
12. Pine Street from 8"~ Street to south City limits.
13. Pine Street extension from Pine Street to SR-101.
14. Cedar Street from Marine Drive to 8~ Street.
15. Tumwater Street from Marine Drive to 5~ Street.
16. "C" Street from 54 Street to 84 Street.
17. 'T' Street from 5"~ Street to 16~ Street.
18. "L" Street from 4t~ Street to 5t~ Street.
19. "M" Street from 4* Street to 18* Street.
20. "N" Street from 44 Street to 18~ Street.
21. "L" Street from 1 gm Street to Lauridsen Boulevard.
22. Milwaukee Drive from "N" Street to west City limits.
23. 2"" Street from Cherry Street to Marine Drive.
24. Marine Drive from Tumwater Truck Route to Daishowa America mill
site.
25. Ediz Hook Road from Daishowa America mill site to Coast Guard air
station.
26. Hill Street from Marine Drive to "L" Street.
-3-
171
27. 4t~ Street from "L" Street to "N" Street.
28. 5t~ Street from Ennis Street to Cherry Street.
29. 5~ Street from Tumwater Street to "L" Street.
30. 8~ Street from "C" Street to 'T' Street.
31. 8~' Street from Race Street to Chambers Street.
32. 10'~ Street from 'T' Street to Milwaukee Drive.
33. "O" Street from 10~ Street to 18~ Street.
34. Campbell Avenue from Mt. Angeles Road to Porter Street.
35. Porter Street from Campbell Avenue to Park Avenue.
36. 16'~ Street from "C" Street to 'T' Street.
37. 18~' Street from 'T' Street to City landfill.
38. Laufidsen Boulevard from Tumwater Truck Route to west City limits.
39. Laufidsen Boulevard from Race Street to Ennis Street.
40. Park Avenue from Laurel Street to Liberty Street.
41. Liberty Street from Park Avenue to Laufidsen Boulevard.
42. Ahlvers Road from Laurel Street to Peabody Street.
43. 15t~ Street from Cherry Street to Lauridsen Boulevard.
44. Future Airport Road from Lauridsen Boulevard to south City limits.
Section 2 Repealer. Ordinance 1928 is hereby repealed.
Section 3 Severability. If any provisions of this Ordinance, or its application to any
person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, or application of ti.
provisions of the Ordinance to other persons or circumstances, is not affected.
Section 4 Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after the date of
publication.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the ~ day of ,1999.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary ~.~,
-4-
172
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE
RCW Chapter 197-11-340
Description of Proposal: A proposal to update the Comprehensive Plan Map Transportation.
Services and Facilities Plan Map (TSFP) to correctly identify certain street classifications within the
City limits, and to amend the City's Planning Areas consistent with Census boundaries in the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
Applicant: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Location of Proposal (including street address, if any): City wide
Lead Agency: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and
other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
[ ] This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for 15 days fi.om the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by
at which time the DNS may be retained, modified, or withdrawn.
[ ] There is no comment period for this DNS.
[XX ] This DNS is issued per WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period.
May l 8,1999 !~Co'~ ~"~-"'~'~-~7>
Date B , Planning Director
You may appeal this determination to the Port Angeles City Council through the Planning Department, 321
East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362, by submitting such written appeal to the Planning Depat:hnent
no later than~!nne2,~9~ You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible
Official: Brad Collins, Planning Director, Port Angeles Planning Department, 321 East Fifth Street, Port
Angeles, WA 98362, phone (360)417-4750.
Pub: 5/21/99
Post: 5/18/99
Mail: 5/18/99
173
174
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AI~IVIENT
APPLICATION FORM
~ ~: Deadline date for application is March 31, 19.~.~
1. APPLICANT CITY OF PORT ANGELES
P.O. Box 1150, Port Angeles, WA 98362
DAYTIME PHONE (360) 417-4750
2. PROPOSED COMP~SXVE PLAN TEXT~ CHANGE (Be speci~ noting Plan
identifies street classifications City wide.
3. JUSTIFICATION/REASON FOR CHANOE: The City's Transnnrt~tinn ~rvices
and Facilities Plan (TSFP) tists.:the classifications of streets
City wide. Those classifications have been amended in some
areas, however, those amendments are not shown in Figure 3.2
of the City's Comprehensive Plan Map, which is the official
map that identifies the street classifications. The TSFP and
the Comprehensive Plan Map need to be in compliance.
(Use more'pages if necessary)
Signed
R~'d/lly:
File ~
~g/ A $ I-~ I N G T O N, U. $. A.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
DATE; May 26, 1999
TO; Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
FILE #: CPA 99-01 (C)
APPLICANT: Norbert and Michelle Juhasz
OWNER: Multiple Ownerships
LOCATION: Areawide
REQUEST: Revise Urban Growth Area (UGA) east boundary line generally to include the
Four Seasons Ranch, FoUr Seasons Park, Deer Park Road and Buchannan
Drive Commercial, and Cedar Park areas.
BACKGROUND;
Proposed Project
The applicant's proposal (Attachment A) is to extend the Urban Growth Area (UGA) to include
property in and east of Morse Creek Ravine, generally described as an extension of the existing UGA
boundary eastward from south margin of the BPA power lines to the east margin of the Deer Park
Road fight-of-way (including the Four Seasons Ranch and Four S~asons Park developments), then
north to the Gene~ Commercial zoning designation, then east following the GC zone boundary, then
north including the GC, RLC, P, and R1 zones, and extending north to the International (US-Canada)
Boundary in the Strait of Juan de Fuca. (See UGA Extension Area map, Attachment B.)
Location and Existing Development
The subject area is located east of the City's existing UGA including properties in Sections 5-8 and
17-18, Range 5 West and Township 30 North
177
CPA 99-01(C) ~ 2
Existing land uses within the subject area are as follows:
Low density residential, public lands, and critical areas within the Morse Creek Ravine
Public lands (including a park and a trail), General Commercial (including a movie theater and
a car dealership), and Rural Limited Commercial (including a restaurant, a gravel pit, and
shooting range) along US 101
Low density residential west of Deer Park Road and south of the Ge zone
Low density residential north of the RLC zone
DISCUSSION:
Environmental Review
The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) under WAC 197-
11-340(2) on May 18, 1999, regarding this request. There is a comment period for this action, and
the threshold determination will not be final until June 3, 1999. The City's responsibility under the
State Environmental Policy Act (RCW 43.21C) will be fulfilled before the City Council can take
action on the Planning Commission's recommendation.
Comprehensive Plan
The Comprehensive Plan establishes the long range goals and policies of the City. It is the basis upon
which City officials are to make land use decisions. Any project proposed in the City must be
consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Designation
The City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map does not designate land uses in the Urban Growth Area
but by policy follows the designations identified in the County's Comprehensive Plan/Zoning map.
The County's Port Angeles Region Zoning Map designations for the subject area include: Rural R1
(1 acre minimum lot area), Public Land P, Rural Limited Commercial RLC, and General Commercial
Goals and Policies
The Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Policies have been reviewed with regards to the proposed
application and the following policies appear to be the most relevant to the proposal.
Growth Management Element, Goal A. To manage growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial
to the community as a whole, is sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals and is consistent with
the State of Washington's Growth Management Act.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 1. In all its actions and to the extent consistent
with the provisions of this comprehensive plan, the City shall strive to implement the following goals
of the State Growth Management Act:
a. Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and
services exist or can be provided in an qf. ficient manner.
178
CPA 99-01(C) P~,~ 3
b. Reduce sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling,
low.density development.
c. Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on
regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans.
d Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the
population. Promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage
preservation of existing housing stock.
e. Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the region that is
consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity, especially for
unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, and encourage growth in areas experiencing
insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the region's natural resources,
public services and public facilities.
f Property rights. Private property shall not be takenforpublic use without just compensation
having been made. The property rights of landowners shah be protected from arbitrary and
discriminatory actions.
g. Permits. ,4pplications for both state and local government permits shouM be processed in
a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability.
h. Natural resource industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource-based industries,
including productive timber, agricultural, and fisheries industries.
i. Open space and recreation. Encourage the retention of open space and development of
recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural
resource lands and water, and develop parks.
j. Environment. Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including
air and water quality, and the availability of water.
k. Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the
planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to
reconcile conflicts.
1. Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to
support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development
is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally
established minimum standards.
m. Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites and structures
that have historical or archaeological significance.
The proposal recognizes the urban character of the development that has been approved in
the subject area and that can only be properly planned for as part of the Port Angeles Urban
Growth Area.
179
CPA 99-01(C) Pa~ 4
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 2. The Port Angeles Urban Growth Area
(PA UGA) shouM be established based at a minimum upon land use demand as determined by the
Clallam County 20-year population forecast for Clallam County and specified sub-areas, so long
as the county-wide forecast is not less thrm the most recent forecasts available from the State Office
of Financial Management.
While population growth in Clallam County has exceeded the forecasts from the State Office
of Financial Management since the Growth Management Act was enacted, the
characterization of continuing urban development of the subject area and the continuation of
problems related to inadequate waste water facilities are driving consideration of this
proposal.
Growth Management Element, GoaI A, Policy No. 3. The City shall work with the County to develop
an annexation plan which allows the annexation of land characterized by urban development and
which is consistent with the extension of services and the land development policies of the City's
Comprehensive Plan and Capital Facilities Plan.
The City and the County are working together to complete an annexation study of the eastern
Port Angeles UGA. However, it may be sometime before the pressures for annexation will
be a cause for new capital facilities planning.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 4. The City should work with the County to ensure
appropriate techniques for managing future growth consistent with the urban density, such as a
minimum density within the PA UGA and a maximum density outside the PA UGA. A range of
densities shouM be provided by the City for lands within the PA UGA, including some lands for
relatively low density single-family development and some lands at a range of densities both
allowing and encouraging multi-family development.
The existing densities in the subject area exceed those designated as urban in character.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 5. Urban services~facilities shall be provided
consistent with the Capital Facilities Element.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 6. The City shouM work with the County and
other service providers to determine the appropriate levels of service for such facilities and services
and to ensure consistency between service provision within the City, the PA UGA, and the County.
Urban services/facilities needed for the subject area will not be planned through the City's
Capital Facilities Plan without the area being included in the City's UGA.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 7. The City's preferred policy is to recognize a
density of one unit per acre as urban/suburban and to use this density as the demarcation between
urban and rural for purposes of establishing or amending the PA UGA; however, the City will
continue to discuss this issue with the County with the goal of arriving at a consistent City/County
policy prior to finalization of the UGA.
The existing densities in the subject area exceed those designated as urban in character.
180
CPA 99-01(C) Pa~¢ ~
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 8. The P,4UGA should include areas
characterized by urban growth adjacent to the existing City boundaries and should take into account
the area's physical features.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 9. Land designated for commercial or industrial'
uses which encourage adjacent urban development shall be located within the PA UGA.
At the time the UGA boundaries were first approved by the County, the City felt that the
physical feature of Morse Creek Canyon was significant enough to demarcate the limits of
urban growth for the Port Angeles urban area. Consequently, the City opposed Clallam
County's original adoption of the subject area as part of the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area.
With continuing urbanization of the Deer Park Road area and with the Endangered Species
Act listing of Puget Sound chinook salmon in Morse Creek, the need for and provision of
urban facilities and services to the Morse Creek and Deer Park Road areas must be planned.
Consequently, the areas characterized by urban development including the commercially used
land and suburban residentially developed land have been included in the proposed UGA
extension.
Growth Management Element, Goal ~1, Policy No. 10. The amount of acreage designated for
commercial, industrial, or other non-residential uses within the PA UG,,I shall be based upon the
Land Use Element and Economic Development Element in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Growth Manctgement Element, Goal A, Policy No. 11. The PA UGA should be established to avoid
cri~cal areas, unless addressed as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and to exclude resource
lands.
These rationales for sizing the UGA for the City of Pon Angeles have been overtaken by the
characterization of the existing urban development and the need for urban services.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 12. Urban services to be provided within the
PA UGA shouM include, at a minimum, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste collection/disposal
systems, water systems, urban roads and pedestrian facilities, street cleaning services, transit
systems, storrnwater systems, police and fire and emergency services systems, electrical and
communication systems, school and health care facilities, and neighborhood and/or community
parks.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 13. The City shouM be the ultimate provider of
urban services within the City limits and the PA UGA for those services the City provides except to
the extent otherwise provided in a UGA Urban Services and Development Agreement that is reached
pursuant to the County-Wide Planning Policy.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 14. Urban services~facilities for which the City
is the ultimate provider should be provided and constructed to meet the design and construction
standards of the City.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 15. The City or service provider shouM
demonstrate the financial capability for continued operation of the facility following construction.
181
CPA ~ ! (C) Pa~e 6
The City of Port Angeles has a better capacity to provide water and sewer to the subject area
than other providers. The County's development standards already recognize the City's
standards as appropriate for urban development within the UGA.
Growth Management Element, Goal`4, Policy No. 16. Regulations to protect critical areas which'
occur within the PA UG`4 shouM be developed to ensure protection of such areas.
The City has critical area ordinances in place which ensure protection of the subject critical
areas such as Morse Creek and the shorelines and marine bluffs along the Strait of Juan de
Fuca. It is expected that the City as well as the County will be required to update its critical
areas protection ordinances consistent with requirements under the Endangered Species Act
listing for Puget Sound chinook salmon.
Growth Management Element, Goal ,4, Policy No. 17. AH development regulations shall be
promulgated with due regard for private property rights in order to avoid regulatory takings or
violation of due process and to protect property rights of landowners from arbitrary and
discriminatory actions.
The City has promulgated regulations to protect private property rights. The proposal
recognizes that to protect the property rights of existing urban development in the subject
area it will be necessary to provide urban facilities and services.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Objectivel. The City will continue its efforts to comply in
a timely manner with the requirements of the State Growth Management Act.
The proposal is consistent with the annual review of the City's Comprehensive Plan and will
follow the procedures for similar review in the County"s Comprehensive Plan. It has been
well over 5 years since the UGA boundaries were first proposed.
Land Use Element, Goal A. To guide current and future development within the City in a manner
that provides certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the
challenges and opportunities of the future.
Land Use Element, Goal`4, Policy 1. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map should be used as
a conceptual guide for determining current and long range zoning and other land use decisions.
The map's land use designations are intended to show areas where general land use types are
allowed. The area between land use designations shouM be considered an imprecise margin in
order to provide flexibility in determining the boundary of such areas, l~hen determining
appropriate zoning designations for an area near a margin, the goals, policies and objectives of the
Land Use Element shouM take precedence.
Land Use Element, Goal `4, Policy 2. ,41l land use decisions and approvals made by the City
Council and/or any of its appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan and its land use map.
For the City's Comprehensive Plan to consider land use designations and urban facility and
service provisions for the subject area, the area must first be included in the Port Angeles
Urban Growth Area. This is necessarily, therefore, the first step for planning and serving the
area by the City of Port Angeles.
t~mi~ ~ a~ran,~ ~, ~.~
CPA ~-ol(c) PT ?
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA 99-
01(C) to the City Council based on the following findings and conclusions. The CPA approval will
not result in any immediate change to the Comprehensive Plan Figure 9 Port Angeles Urban Growth'
Area Map but rather initiate a request for the recommended change to Clallam County, where a
separate Comprehensive Plan amendment process must occur for adopting the UGA change.
Findings
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff'Report for CPA 99-01(C), (including
all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public hearing, and the
Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission
hereby finds that:
1. All information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01 (C), (including all
of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public hearing, and the
Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation have been considered in this decision and
is considered a part thereof.
2. The applicants are Norbert and Michelle Juhasz, represented by Linda Nutter, and they are
requesting to an extension of the eastern Port Angeles Urban Growth Area (Attachment A).
3. The Urban Growth Area (UGA) extension is shown on the Planning Department map
(Attachment B) to include property in and east of Morse Creek Ravine, generally described
as an extension of the existing UGA boundary eastward from south margin of the BPA power
lines to the east margin of the Deer Park Road right-of-way (including the Four Seasons Ranch
and Four Seasons Park developments), then north to the General Commercial zoning
designation, then east following the GC zone boundary, then north including the GC, RLC,
P, and R1 zones, and extending north to the International (US-Canada) Boundary in the Strait
of Juan de Fuca.
4. The subject area is located east of the City's existing UGA including properties in Sections
5-8 and 17-18, Range 5 West and Township 30 North.
5. Existing land uses within the subject area are as follows:
* Low density residential, public lands, and critical areas within the Morse Creek Ravine
* Public lands (including a park and a trail), General Commercial (including a movie theater
and a car dealership), and Rural Limited Commercial (including a restaurant, a gravel
pit, and shooting range) along US 101
* Low density residential west of Deer Park Road and south of the GC zone
* Low density residential north of the RLC zone
6. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) under
WAC 197-11-340(2) on May 18, 1999, regarding this request. There is a comment period
for this action, and the threshold determination will not be final until June 3, 1999. The City's
responsibility under the State Environmental Policy Act (RCW 43.21C) will be fulfilled before
the City Council can take action on the Planning Commission's recommendation.
7. This is an areawide Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and public notice was provided by legal
notice and a paid advertisement in the Peninsula Dally News.
CPA 99.0 I(C) Page
8. The Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies idenitifiecl as being the most relevant to the
proposal were Growth Management Element Goal A, Policies A 1-17, Objective A-I, Land
Use Element Goal A, and Policies A 1-2.
9. The County Port Angeles Region Zoning Map designations the subject area as RI, P, GC,'
and RLC.
10. The subject area was included in the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area as originally adopted
by Clallam County.
11. Morse Creek has been identified as habitat for Puget Sound chinook salmon, which have been
listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.
12. The Four Seasons Ranch and the Four Seasons Park residential developments have
experienced waste water system failures.
Conclusions
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01 (C), (including
all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public hearing, the Planning
Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed findings, the City of Port Angeles
Planning Commission hereby concludes the following:
A. The proposed UGA extension includes areas that are characterized by urban development
and, therefore, appropriately should be pan of the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area.
B. Urban facilities and services needed to serve the proposed area can be provided by the City
of Port Angeles.
C. The listing of Puget Sound chinook salmon in Morse Creek as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act will necessitate sewer system improvements in the subject area.
D The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan,
specifically those listed in Finding 8.
E. The City of Port Angeles cannot plan or provide urban facilities and services outside its Urban
Growth Area, even though the area is characterized by urban development.
F. Property owners in the subject area are experiencing problems that could be served by urban
facilities and services.
G. The proposed expansion of the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area is in the public interest.
This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council, which can recommend a change in the
City's Urban Growth Area to Clallam County.
CPA.9901.C
184
JUHASZ Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposal
1999
· Bxts~lnff Boundary
- (western bounaary ot
Morse Creek Canyon) Pro Boundary
Al~rACHMB NTB
(os) = = (uNc)
RCC5
'* ' '-' ~ .... I .' "
-.
~. RS
Zoning Designations
~ CF Commercial Forest 3
-~ CFM20 Comercial Forest-Residential Mixed 20 '--: ' ·
~ CFM5 Comercial Forest-Residential Mixed 5 .'
~ P Public Land .............
(R1 Rural ..... -"
.--'--] R2 Rural Moderate
~ R5 Rural Low :'.::?':!: ..............
~ R20 Rural Very Low ....... :'" i RCC5
,----] RCC3 Rural Character Conservation 3
RCC5 Rural Character Conservation 5
__ OS Urban Very Low Density-Open Space 33'
~ VLD-LD Urban Very Low Density-Low Density
-'--'] VLD Urban Very Low Density .... ....... .... - .
---] LD Urban Low Density ....... .
-~ MD . Urban Moderate Density ....................
~ UNC Urban Neighborhood Commercial . "
~ URC Urban Regional Commercial
~ RNC Rural Neighborhood Commercial
~ RLC Rural Limited Commercial "
----] M Industrial ' .::..,'
RS
Elwha Tdbe
O O Urban Growth Area Boundary ~" '
PmtANa r s
W A S H I N G T O N, U.S.A. Building Dept. []
Planning Dept.
I~~_~o' ~t~__~..', , '~-~ 'PublicWor~ ~.Ci~Manager
,, DATE: May 19, 1999 · e~
DEP~TMENT TO; Pl~ng Dep~mem
FROM; D~ McKeen, Fire M~shal ~ t ~
Bmee W. Becket
Fire Chief
[4651] ~: Comprehensive Pl~ ~en~ents - 1999
Daniel K. McKeen Th~ Fire D~p~ment h~ reviewed ~e i~ti~ request to revise ~e Urb~ Gro~h
Fire Marshal
{4653] ~ea ~GA), mov~g ~e UGAs e~t bo~d~ line to Deer P~k Road ~d no~ of
Highway 101 along Buch~ Drive ~d h~ the follo~ng co~ents.
Coral ~eeler
Adminis~afive Assistant: If~e above revision is adopted ~ p~ of~e UGA ~d is comidered for ~exation
[46s0] into ~e Ci~, th~ following ~e~ would need to be ~er rese~ch~d:
L. Keith Bogues
Training Officer 1. Fire ~d EMS r~sponse tim~s to the proposed ~ea
H6s2]
2. Fire flow wi~n ~e proposed ~ea, ~d
David R. Chastain
Medical Officer
3. The potential ~pact to ~e Fire Dep~ent in delivering c~nt levels of
[4665]
se~ices.
The Fire Department has also reviewed the following proposals:
1. Amendment to the change the designation for the Housing Authority off
Francis Street from low density residential to medium density residential and
has no objections.
2. Change the City's comprehensive plan to reflect the current street
designations in the transportation services and facilities plan and has no
. objections.
3. Request to revise the census tract boundary lines to coordinate with planning
area boundaries and has no objections.
D1M/cw
FP - 26 Page 1 of 1
187
188
2. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT/MAP CHANGF. (Be specific noting Plan
policy citations.)
3. JUSTIFICATION/REASON FOR CHANGE:
(Use more' pages if necessary)
File #:
HmHng:
189
COMPREltENSIVE PI,AN AMENDMENT
APPLICATION FORM
March 30, 1999
Norben and Michelle Juhasz
183 Cedar Park Drive
Port Angeles, WA 98362
(360) 452-8888
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT/MAP CHANGE
There is no major text change except for text that describes the boundary of the Port
Angeles Urban Growth Area on the east side of the map. In general, the boundary shall
extend eastward from the power lines to Deer Park Road, turn north down Deer Park
Road, turn east to include the G-C zone, and then north to include the RLC, P, and all R1
zones ending at the base of the bluff on the Strait of Juna de Fuca. This would also
include 4 Season's Park and 4 Season's Ranch.
JUSTIFICATION/R.EASON FOR CHANGE
To include aH types of urban related development (mainly commercial as well as
residential requiring sanitary sewers) that should be within the PAUGA and to provide a
vehicle for possible development ora very small destination/recreation hotel within the
PAUGA. Currently the only zoning within Clallam County for a small destination hotel
is spot zoning, which, historically, has been used just for the fishing resorts along the
Strait of Jaun de Fuca and a small cabin resort at Lake Dawn. Because spot zoning in
Clallam County is not generally approved or granted, a small hotel/recreation resort may
be possible ii'the PAUGA is extended to the east.
190
183 Cedar Park Drive
Port Angeles, WA 98362
May 26, 1999 PORT ANG£LF.S CITY
City of Port Angeles ~C /'~-c
Planning Commission
Pon Angeles, WA 98362
Dear Planning Commission Members:
The purpose in applying for this boundary change stem mainly from the realization that if we would
ever like to develop our property, the zoning classifications within Clallam County does not lend itself
to a small destination resort. We are looking to the future, do not know if we would like to take on the
responsibility and financial strain of developing a small destination hotel, but we would like to have
that oppommity if we should decide to do so.
We have, through our representative, talked with Clallam County Planners and investigated what could
be done with our property using the county's land-use designations. The County was helpful and
informative; but currently the only zoning with Clallam County for a small destination hotel is spot
zoning, which, historically, has been used only for the already estabUshed fi.~hing resorts along the
Strait of Juan de Fuca plus the zoning has been used for a small cabin resort at Lake Dawn. Because
spot zoning is generally discouraged, the likelihood of having approval for a spot zone change with our
property did not look very probable.
In exploring other avenues of what we might consider doing with our property, we were obviously
aware o~
First: there is the urban sprawl that has occurred to the east of the city, and planning for the future for
urban facilities and services needed in this area can be provided and started in an orderly manner by
the City of Port Angeles and Clallam County.
Second: urban services such as sewer are needed, especially in the 4 Seasons area, and the listing of
the Chinook salmon as a threatened species will necessitate sewer system improvements in the Morse
Creek area;
Third: f~om our own personal interest, ~hould we ever decide to develop our property, the zoning
designations within the City o£Port Angeles lend themselves to the possibility of being able to apply
for the development ora small quality destination resort. We are aware the just the ability of being
able to apply does not grant us the ability to build and develop in any manner; there will be conditions
and approvals that we must meet. Thus, thi.~ process of extending the UGA in conjunction with the
County and if the County approves, is what we see as the first step.
We have read the Planning Department's StaffReport and agree with the findings, and we ask that you
approve CPA 99-01(C).
Michene and O' /
:' 191
pORTANCEr S
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
March 29, 1999
Mr. and Mrs. Norbert Juhasz
183 Cedar Park Drive
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Deer Park Road
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Juhasz:
This is in response to your letter of March 4, 1999, requesting that the City's eastern Urban
Growth Area (UGA) boundary be extended to the Deer Park Road area. The Planning
Department is in agreement with your request and will pursue a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, which is the first step in the revision process.
Please be aware that although the Planning Department supports and will seek an amendment
to the UGA boundary, a formal application submitted by a property owner would ensure final
consideration by the City Council. A proposal not formally requested could be withdrawn prior
to consideration. A formal application could only be withdrawn by yourselves. Such an
application must be accompanied by a $450 application fee. The deadline for submission of a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment is March 3 l, 1999.
The Planning Commission will consider amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan at the
April 28, 1999, meeting. A final decision will be made by the City Council no later than June,
1999.
Ifyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office at 417-4750.
Sincerely,
Brad Collins
Planning Director
Attachments
321 EAST fIFTH STREET ® P O. BOX ! 150 ® PORT ANGELES, WA 98362-O217
PHONE: 360-417-4750 ® FAX: 360-417-4609 ® TTY: 360-417-46~,5
~ 92 E-MAIL: PLANNING~CI.PORT-ANGELES.WA.US
183 Cedar Park Drive
Port Angeles, WA 98362
March 4, 1999 [~ 0 ~
Mayor Gary Braun and
City Council Members
City of Port Angeles
321 East Fifth Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Dear Mayor Braun and Council Members:
RE: Request change of the eastern boundary of the Urban Growth Area (UGA)
Since the adoption of the City's Comprehensive Plan and UGA boundaries, there
is, as you know, a great deal of commercial development in the county in the
Deer Park area, east of the current UGA.
Would the City Council please give consideration to reviewing the boundaries to
possibly extend the UGA to the area the county originally proposed (or somewhat
close to that proposal) and also inform us as to what steps we must take to be
part of this procedure.
We understand that any requests of changes of the UGA boundary must be in by
the end of this month and that the City must have its proposal to the County by
the end of December.
Your cooperation is very much appreciated.
Norbert and Michele Juhasz
193
194
~--~-~ ~ ......... w
NO. 854
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
Adoption of: DNS No.__ EISXX Other:
Description of Current Project: Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Port Angeles
Regional Comprehensive Plan
APPLICANT: Mr. and Mrs. Norbert Juhasz
Location: See description below
Description of document being adopted: The project is an amendment to the City's
Comprehensive Plan to amend the City's east Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundary from the west
rim of the Morse Creek Canyon east to the east side of Deer Park Road extending north of Highway
101 in the area of Buchannan Drive.
Agency that prepared the document being adopted: Clallam County Department of Community
Development
Date the adopted document was .originally prepared: June 13, 1995. The document was not
appealed.
Pertinent application materials are available for review at the City of Port Angeles Planning
Department, 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, Washington, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. -
5 p.m.
The previous document has been identified and adopted as being appropriate for this proposal after
independent review. The document meets our environmental review needs for the current
proposal and will accompany the proposal to the decisionmaker.
NAME OF AGENCY ADOPTING THE DOCUMENT: City. of Port Angeles
Contact/SEPA Responsible Official: Brad Collins, Planning Director
321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362
Phone Number: (360) 417-4750
Date: June4:1999 Signature: ~- ~
Brad Collins, Planning Director
cc: Applicant
County DCD
DOE
Andy Duran
PUB/MAIL: 616199
G :\PLANNING\SEPA\ADOPTION~,COMPLAN .UGA
This material is from the June 13, 1995 Pinal Bnvironmental Impact
Statement for the Port Angeles Regional Comprehensive Plan prepared
and adopted by C1allam County.
Appendix B - Final Environmental Analysis . June 13, 19
Project Title: Port Angeles Eegional-Comprehensive Plan
Project Descriptiom Adopt the Port Angeles ~gion~l Plan, Chapter .~1.04
Cl~ll~m County Code, in order to hnplement the
requirements of the Growth Management Act.
Principal Alternatives:. Adopt policies either more or less restrictive than
those propose~ in the draft Reg/onal Plan, whiah is the
preferred alternative.
Location: Clallam County, Washln~;on
Proponent/Lead Clallam County
Agency:
Responsible OEScial: Grant Beck, Planning Director
Contact Person: Rich James, Senior Planner
Clanam County Dept. of Community Development
223 East 4th Street
Port Angeles, wA 98362
(z06) 417-23z6
Licenses, Permits and Adoption of Regional plan by the Board of Clallam
Approvals Neces~.-y: County Commissioners.
Authors and Pr/nc/pal R/ch JAmes, Senior Planner
Contributors to the Bruce Emery, Assistant Planner
Env/ronmentel ' Le~nne Jenk4ns, Water Quality Planner.
Analysis:
Date of Issuance: .June 13, 1995
Location of Clallam County Dept. of Community DevelOpment
Background Data: 223 East 4th Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Appendix B - Final EnvLronmental Analysis J~me 13, 199~
The no action alternative analyzes the existing land use policies co&i6ed in the
current ClalJ~m County Comprehensive Plan and Zonin~ Code. This is used hs the
baseline to analyze impacts to the environment attributable to the adoption of the
proposed Regional PI~. The present Zonin~ Code includes 20 land use
classifications, most of which can be found in the Port Angles region. Presently, the
zoning of the region ranges from Commercial Forest in the footl~ill., with a buffer of
CFM-20, CFM-5, Forestry, and Forestry Residential. Rural Residenti~ zon~Dg is
found in the rural areas located between the forested foothill, and the coastline.
Urban Residential can be found near the City of Port Angeles. Commercial areas are
limited to O'Brien Road, Laird's Corner, Grannies near Lake Sutherland, Shadow
Mountain Store at Lake Sutherland and to the area bordering Highway 101 in the
Port Angeles urban growth area.
The Environmental AnAlysis has shown that some of the present land use
designations are appropriate. Densities allocated region:wide, however, are greater
thsn~ can be supported at buildout with present public facilities and road systems.
Present land use designations are also inappropriate in many cases near critical
areas, including high aquifer recharge areas, wetlands, streams, landslide and
erosion h~rd areas (the original zoning code was adopted prior to the adoption of
critical areas regulations). The adoption of the revised County Wide Comprehensive
plan also makes some commerei~ and industrial designations outside urban growth
areas non-conforming with the policies of the plan.
The preferred alternative is composed of the land use goals and issues contained in
the draft Port Angeles Regio~ Plan and implementation measures forwarded to the
County Commissioners/Planning Commission for their consideration. The draft pJs~
is included in this document as part of the ~ombined regional comprehensive plan
and environmental analysis.
Earlier comprehensive planning efforts in Cl~tl]~m County produced a comprehensive
p!~,~ which provided for densities in rural and resource ar~as of the county which led
to conversion of resource land~ to residenti~! use and loss of rural character in rural
areas. This plan provides for retention of commerCe's! forestlands though adol~ti0n of
the resource designations and zoning which were utilized as interim protection
measures in the 1992 amendments to the comprehensive p!~. This plan also
provides for some reduction of rural densities were current rural densities exceed
those which would retain rural character in rural areas and where such rural
de_n__m_'ties would require the extension of urban type services in rural areas. The plan
does provide for increased densities in urban growth areas and allows for density
transfers f3~om some rural areas abutting urban growth areas where density was
reduced by this plan. Growth management plans must provide for twenty years
worth o£population growth.' Providing for excess densities in rural and resource
lands would only lead to loss of resource lands, &~mln~ed rural quality of life and
prevent county government from being able to provide services in a cost effective
m~n~er. Many of the land use designations proposed in this plan are similar to
B-5 :.
1.97
Appendix B - Final Environmental Analysis June 13. 199'5
existing designations, with most proposed changes occurring in rural and urban_
designations. Urban designations in the Port Angeles urban growth area use '
same names and density r~nges envisioned in the City of Port Angeles
comprehensive plan in order to facilitate smooth transitions of portions of the urban
area to city jurisdiction in the future. -
Large increases in density are envisioned inside the urban growth area where
present zoning anticipates rural densities. Outside the urban area, a limited area of
rural land with one acre densities would change to 2.4 acre densities while more
remote rural ]znds would change from 2.4 acre densities to 5 acre densities. Rural
Character Conservation designations allow 10 acre densities by right but would allow
for a mix of large and small lots in order to utilize pm-existing densities of 2.4 and 5
acres per home. Utili~irtg this Rural Character Conservation development pattern
reduces environment~d damage which results from conventional development
patterns by allowing development to occur away from critical areas. It also
significantly reduces the miles of road needed to serve an equivalent amount of
density since home sites can be grouped near existing roads.
The proposed land use designations attempt to take critical areas and resource lands
into consideration through the placement of lower density districts adjacent to
industrial forestry lands and areas with a significant amount of critical areas and by
requiring a development pattern which protects critical areas. Additionally, the plan
attempts to provide forested buffers adjacent to commercial forest activities through
application of a Commercial Forest/Residential Mixed Use designation.
This Environmental Analysis does not contain an alternative which consists of a
alternate set of policies which could be adopted in lieu of the preferred option (t''
proposed Regional Plan). Rather, the analysis of each neighborhood includes
identification of alternatives which might result in a lower environmental cost'for
consideration by the decision mAki,g body. . .
The Port Angeles Region consists of that portion of Clallam County lying between
Lake Crescent in the west and Sieberts Creek in the east. The region contains the
incorporated City of Port Angeles. The property outside the urban area currently
cont~inA a mix of land uses including forestry and rural residential.
Located just east of the City of Port Angeles wi~h;n the urban growt]l boundary is the
Gales Addition Neighborhood. This neighborhood is characterized by single f~mily
housing at urban densities w~th a mix of higher density multi-family development
near Highway 101. A neighborhood serving commer~ol area with small scale
businesses and the PUD offices front on Highway 101 on the south neighborhood
border. Steep sided ravines and marine bluffs define several neighborhood
boundaries.
.The Lees Creek Neighborhood is located within the urban growth area on the north
aide of Highway 101 between Lees Creek and Morse Creel~ The neighborhood is
.characterized by single f~mily homes at 1 acre densities. These low densities res,~.
from the lo~tion of several large wetlands in the neighborhood. Near Highway ,
B-6
Appendix B - Final Enx~ronmenta] Analysis J~ne 13. ! 99.~
a small area with multi-family development is found and neighborhood serving
commercial uses front directly on the Highway. Steep sided ravines and marine
bluffs define several neighborhood boundaries.
The 4 Seasons Neighborhood is located within the urban growth area in the ra~-ine -
bottom of Morse Creek. 4 Seasons Ranch and Park are urban density subdivisions
approved prior to' zoning in Clallam County. 4 Seasons Ranch is an example of a
successful open space' development which combines smaller residential lots with open
space within the Port Angeles Region.
The Fairview Neighborhood is located north of Highway 101 between Bagley and
Siebert Creek. The neighborhood is a combination of low density rural development
and urban density subdivisions at the Bluffs, at the intersection of Old Olympic-SR
101 and on upper Lake Farm Road. The Green Point Area is the site of a large
planned unit development. Commercial/Industrial uses are clustered at Buchanan
Road.
The Deer Park Neighborhood has a variety of land uses ranging from Commercial
Forestry south of Townskip Line Road to verY low density rural land uses north of'
Townskip Line Road to Highway 101 with a cluster of commercial uses at the
intersection of Deer Park Road and Highway 101.
The Monroe Road Neighborhood has a variety of land uses which grade from
commercial forestry in the foothill~, to rural verY low density and rural character
conservation abutting the commerciol forestlands, to rural low in the flatter
lowlands, 'to rural moderate densities abutting the city, to urban densities near
Highway 101.
~e Black Diamond Neighborhood is a compact area located south of Highway 101
between Valley Creek and DrY Creek. The .upper watershed in this ~ieighborhood
st~pports comme~nl forestry operations with ln,~_d managed by the state and large
private timber companies.' The ma~or portion of Black Diamond valley has been
designated Eural Low Density, wi~h the area just south of Highway 101 designated
for Rural Moderate, Density.
The Dry Creek Neighborhood is located between the City of Port Angeles and
Elwha River on the north side of Highway 101. The area east of Eeddick Eoad is
within the urban growth area and has been designated for a mix of urban density
development and some industrial uses where they are currently in operation. A large
portion of this area was formerly designated for indu~rial land use but lack of
industrial land demand and lack of infr~~ h_~s created a situation where
property owners strongly desire a change to residential us~ so that they will have a
possibility to market their i__sod for residential uses. The largest portion of this _
neighborhood is located outside the urban growth area and has a very rural, low
density character. Areas bordering the city have been designated for Rural 'Low
Densities in order to allow for future redevelopment potential should these areas
annex to the City of.Port Angeles. Areas bordering the Elwha River and west of
Reddick Road have a Rural Character Conservation designation which will allow
present densities to be utilized while maintaining the.essential rural character of the
neighborhood even at full development.
The Place Road/Eden valley/Little River Neighborhood lies.west of th~ Elwha River
and Dry Creek. The southern portion of this neighborhood is heavily utilized for
commercial forestry. Rural Character Conservation designations'are utilized near
Place Road, upper Eden Valley Road and on Highway 101 in Eden Valley to allow
B-7
Appendix B - Final Environmental Analysis Jun'e
the very rural characteristics of this neighborhood to be retained. Portions of Eden
Valley have retained 5 acre and 20 acre conventional zoning as these lands
already heavily parcelized in this manner.
The Lake Sutherland Neighborhood lies between Lake Crescent and the w_estern
portion of Indian Creek valley. The steep Sided slopes in this neighborhood are used
Almost exclusively for commercial forestry and are managed by the Forest Service,
the state and large timber companies..The area immediately bordering Lake
Sutherland has developed at urban densities and is heavily used as recreational
cabins[ Neighborhood Commercial uses are found at the Shadow Mountain store and
at Grannies in Indian Creek valley.
The total population of the region was 26,862 in 1990, with a median age of 36 years.
Females comprised 51% of the regional population in 1990. There were 11,891 total
housing units in the region in 1990, of which a total of 7,833 are located inside the
city limits of Port Angeles.
Table 1 - Regional Population~
Neighbo~ood 1990 2000 2010
, Pop, ulation Population Population
Gales Addition 747 781 816
Lees Creek 432 451, 472
4 Seasons 641 670 700
Fa irview 880 972 1074
Deer Park 1170 1292 1428
Monroe Road/Foothills 2398 2648 2926
Dry Creek 848 937 1035
Black Diamond ' 560. 618 683
Eden Valley/Little River 788 - 870 962
Lake Sutherland 688 718 751
City of Port Angeles 17,710 18,577 19,674
Port Angeles Region 2'6,862 28,534 .~ 30,521
Chart 1 - Neighborhood Population Distributionj
2000.
Based on 1990 Census information and using a linear projection model
Ba~d on 1990 Census information.
Appendix B - Final Environmental Analysis June 13, 199,'
Chart 3 - Area of Existing and Proposed Rural Land Uses in Acres
35oooj
3CXXXL
25000_
20000_
15000_
10000.. · Existing Zoning
5000_ · Proposed Zoning
0-,
Table 7 - Neighborhood Parcel Analysisz
Area ,Developed Developed Vacant Total
(homes) (other) Parcels Parcels
Gales Addition ' 332 ' 9' 15~1 499
Lees Creek 192 15 160 367
Fairviewiinside UGA) 39 1 26 66
Fairy)aw(outside UGA) 353 5 525 883
Deer Park(inside UGA) 74 O 32 106
Deer Park(outside UGA) 446 2 899 1,447
Monroe Road{inside UGA) 464 32 320 816
Monroe Road(outside UGA) 602 I 1,046 1,649
Black Diamond(inside UGA) 31 14 35 76
Black Diamond(outside UGA) 218 5 395 613
Dry Creek(inside UGA) 165 13 124 302
Dry Creek(outside UGA) 212 11 574 .797
Little River/Eden Valley/Place 350 6 848 1,204
Lake Sutherland 306 I 178 485
Port Angeles Region 3,784 115 5,320 9,309
Parcel information was obtained from Assessor's records.
B - 24 "
201
Appendix B - Final Environmental A~lalysis June 13, 1995
The focus of these actions is prevention of pollution from on-site sewage disposal, ..
land clearing and grading, and hvestock keeping on small parcels of land. Positive
impacts of the proposed actions include reduced potential for groundwater
contamination due to bacteria and/or nitrates, reduced sedimentation of streams and
wetlands, maintenance of water quahty and fish and wildlife habitat. -
The City of Port Angeles is the only urban growth area in the region. The City of
Port Angeles provides a full range of urban services within the city boundaries.
Urban services are provided in the unincorporated urban growth by the PUD (water),
Dry Creek Water Association (water), Black Diamond Water Association (water), Fire
District #2 (Fire protection, emergency services), Sheriffs Department (Police
Protection), and Clallam County (Paved Roads, stormwater systems).
~ortfln~e[gs The Port Angeles Interim Urban Growth Area was derived after a process of
population studies and projections, citizen involvement,-public hearings, and county
and city negotiations. The current bruits of the Interim UGA are based largely on the
existing location of urban density, commercial activity and industrial uses in the area
near the city. Although the City of Port Angeles could accommodate all of the growth
expected in the next 20 years through inffll development of existing vacant lands
inside the current city hmits, the Growth Management Act also stipulates that the
UGA boundary must incorporate those lands adjacent to cities which are already
characterized by urban growth. The City of Port Angeles currently contains 6,100
acres of land, while the proposed urban growth area contains 9,900 acres.
Surnrnar~J of The designation of the Port Angeles urban growth area as identified in the regional
plan should implement the goals of the plan relating to bruiting urban sprawl by
Impacts allowing sufficient area within urban areas to provide for the 20 year need for
residential, commercial, and industrial developments.
Because urban growth areas do contain critical areas, such as wetlands and streams,
urban development which occurs in the vicinity of these areas should adhere to
approved critical areas ordinances. The sensitivity of groundwater resources in
certain urban areas of the county, standards should be established to prevent the
contamination of the aquifers.
B - 26
202
Appendix B - Final Environmental Analysis June 13, 1995
Chart 4 - Neighborhood Development Pattern?
Chart 5 - Neighborhood Development Patterns
Parcel information was obtained from Assessor's records
Parcel information was obtained from Assessor's records
B - 25
203
Appendix B - Fired Environmental Armlysis June 13, 1995
~acf~roun~ The City of Port Angeles urban growth area is bounded by Dry Creek and Reddick
Road to the west, Deer Park Road and the Old Railroad Grade to the east, the
Bonneville Power Line, Scrivner Road and Edgewood Drive to the South and the
Strait of Juan De Fuca to the North. The City of Port Angeles will have primary
planning responsibility within the urban growth area, with the City adopting the
sections of the County Plan dealing with the urban growth area and the county
utilizing City Land Use designation and standards within the urban growth area. All
plans must be consistent with each other and the County-wide Policy Plan as well as
meeting the minimum requirements of the Growth Management Act.
The current zoning classification of much of the urban growth area (outside the
existing City limits) is urban residential, rural residential, commercial and
industrial. The regional plan indicates that the City of Port Angeles should be the
primary commercial and service center for the region, although some commercial
development will occur on the larger vacant commercial parcels bordering Highway
101 within the urban growth area.
The urban growth area contains many wetlands, streams, landslide hazard areas,
marine bluffs and other critical areas. The Natural Environment Element of the
Regional Plan identifies most of these critical areas with critical area maps and
designates them within an Open Space Overlay designation. The purpose of this
designation is to further protect critical areas by allow development rights to be
transferred from these lands to more developable portions of the urban growth area.
Receiving areas within the urban growth area have been designated.
There are se'¢eral roads located inside the urban growth area and outside the existing
CiW limits which are at level of service C including Monroe Road and Mount
Pleasant Road.
Using a build-out analysis based on the proposed land use designations, Highway
Iffy'ts 101, Lower Mount Pleasant Road, Lower Monroe Road, Airport Road and portions of
Edgewood Drive will be well below adequate level of service.
Urban development (dwellings units on lots less than one acre) could have adverse
impacts on the critical areas located in the urban growth area. Although urban
development should be served by the standard urban infrastructure (sewer, water,
and roadways) there will be impacts to the critical areas attributable to this level of
density and lot coverage.
The bluffs above the Strait of Juan De Fuca are currently characterized by densities
of less than one home per acre in most of the unincorporated urban growth area.
Additional urban development of this shoreline area could have impacts on both the
water quality of the Straits (from increased surface water runnoff) and from other
non-point sources of pollution.
B- 27
204
Appendix B - Final Environmental Analysis June 13, 1995
~Ba~f~round' This neighborhood is entirely within the urban growth area. With the exception of
one business on Highway 101 this neighborhood is entirely composed of single family-
residences. Two major urban density subdivisions were developed in this
neighborhood prior to the adoption of the current zoning code. Newer homes are
found throughout the neighborhood. Some older homes and mobile homes are found
in the 4 Season Park Subdivision.
The neighborhood contains a marine shorehne along the Strait, steep sided creek
ravines and Morse Creek with its associated bottomlands. Highway 101 and two
private subdivision roads provide excellent access to this neighborhood.
imiptlC.M The proposed land use designations are similar to those already in existence. The
urban Low Density designation is similar to the densities currently in place. The
Very Low Density/Open Space designation recognizes the steep sided ravines of
Morse Creek and the Morse Creek floodplain as well as the marine bluffs fronting the
Strait. These designations are similar to existing designations and as such,
environmental impacts of the proposed plan no greater than the current plan
There is a well developed road system in the neighborhood but the roads are not built
to city standards. The wetlands and marine shoreline areas are protected by the
Interim Critical Areas Ordinance and will be adjacent to similar impact, land uses as
they are presently. Some critical areas are also protected by permanent open space
within the existing subdivisions. As the allowed land use patterns will not change
signii'lcantly, there should be no environmental impacts associated with the proposed
regional plan in this neighborhood.
Iri~l/~X The protection of the streams, wetlands, and manne shorehne found in this
neighborhood is covered by the standards of existing environmental regulations. The
designation of Low Density/Open Space Overlay zones may provide additional
protection to these areas as development rights are purchased.
State right-of-way at the bottom of the carve in the Morse Creek curve should be
maintained in state ownership to allow this scenic corridor to be maintained.
~l~2t~.~ Existing zoning could be retained in this neighborhood but it would not protect the
environment as well as the proposed zoning which reduces the impacts that would be
expected in the Open Space Overlay zone.
A smaller urban growth area might exclude this neighborhood but the neighborhood
is already largely built out at urban densities so that environmental harm might be
realized if this neighborhood fronting on Morse Creek is never hooked up to city
sewer which would reduce the chance of septage leaking into the creek.
The property designated as Low Density/Open Space Overlay could be designated as
Open Space Overlay with no development potential as most of this area is
unbufldable.
B-31
Appendix B -Finai Environmental Analysis June 13, 19~.
(Bazf~r'ounaC The Fairview Neighborhood is located between Highway 101 and the Straits and is -
bounded to the west and east by Morse Creek and Siebert Creek. Only a small
portion of this neighborhood near the Deer Park intersection with Highway 101 is
within the urban growth area. Commercial and industrial uses near Deer Park
include C'est Si Bon, the Gun Club and the large gravel pit just north of the Gun
Club. A large motel has also been proposed for the area near C'est Si Bon. The
Bluffs Subdivision, Cedar Glen Subdivision and an area of one acre lots on upper
Lake Farm Road are found within this neighborhood and have developed at urban
densities. These urban density subdivisions will be designated as Rural Suburban
Communities and expansion of these areas beyond their present boundaries will be
limited. Average density outside of the areas designated for Rural Suburban
Community land use would be 1 home per 5 acres.
The neighborhood contains several large wetlands which must be protected and
retained including the former lakebed near Lke Farm Road. Other critical areas in
the neighborhood include Bagley Creek, Siebert Creek, the marine bluff and erosion
hazard areas between Gasman Road and Lake Farm Road
The appearance and functionality of the commercial area near Highway 101 concerns
neighborhood residents. Survey results from the area-wide questionnaire would
indicate that area residents would support the Deer Park Gateway concept to
upgrade the appearance of Highway 101 with street trees, landscaping and better
intersection traffic control.
Access to residential properties north of Highway 101 is a problem due to the
deficient nature of Lake Farm Road and North Bagley Creek Road. Egress from
Buchanan Drive onto Highway 101 is also becoming difficult due to increased
commercial activity in the area.
Irtrl°e/z't$ The Fairview Neighborhood includes three Rural Suburban Communities Two of
these subdivisions, the Bluffs and Cedar Glen, are developments platted prior to
County zoning ordinances being adopted. The Regional Plan simply recognizes the
present density and allows for i~fi]l development at the same density.
West of the Bluffs Subdivision is an area that was formerly occupied by a lake which
wa~ drained many year~ ago.' Although the luke is gone, the former lakebed is not
well drained and will not support residential development. Earlier planu recognized
this situation and only allowed development to occur at 5 acre densities. The
proposed plan maintains those 5 acre densities hut u*.lll-es a Rural Character
Conservation development pattern which will allow the lakebed to exist as an
undivided lot so that it can be utilized as a productive open area. Rural Character
Conservation designations are also utilized in the Green Point area which border
Siebert Creek and west of the Cedar Glen Subdivision where this designation will
function to retain rural character and limit environmental degradation.
Densities bordering Highway 101 have been reduced in the proposed plan from 1
home per acre to 1 home per 2.4 acres. This reduction in density is proposed because
the committees developing the plan and public response to density issues strongly
indicate that conventional development at 1 acre density does not maintain rural
B - 32'
Appendix B - FinalEnvironmental Analysis June 13, 1995
characteristics in rural areas and creates a strong demand for urban type services in
rural areas contrary to the goals of the Growth Management Act.
Density of development in the area between Lake Farm Road and Gasman Road has
been reduced in this plan in recognition of the erosion hazards existing on these
sloping hillsides. -
The Lakeside Industries gravel pit bordering Siebert Creek has been designated
Commercial Forest. This designation ensures the continued use of this pit for
production of gravel as this will be a permitted use in the implementing zoning
designation.
The western edge of this neighborhood is within the boundaries of the urban growth
area. The bluff front subdivisions along Cedar Park Drive have been designated for
urban Low Density which allows a density of up to 9 units per acre. This density is
similar to that already found in this area. An Urban Commercial Center land use is
designated for the lands currently used as a Gun Club and as a gravel pit. This
designation will allow for development of large scale commercial uses. The current
site of the state owned overlook has been designated as a public land use.
This neighborhood contains shellfish beds, geologically unstable bluffs, shorelines,
and wildlife habitat. The high bank marine bluffs in the Bluffs have been affected by
stormwater runoff, causing considerable erosion and sedimentation.
Potable water is provided in the PUD and a private company operating community
water systems. Sanitary sewers are not available in this area which contains areas of
poor soils with limitations for on-sit~ septic systems.
Major road improvements are scheduled in this neighborhood and others may be
needed to serve the proposed development pattern. Old Olympic Highway is
scheduled for widening and the Siebert Creek curve will be straightened within the
next six year. Lake Farm Road is also scheduled for widening and may eventually be
lengthened to provide a connection to Gasman Road.
The proposed land use densities in the Fairview Neighborhood are reduced in the
rural portions of this neighborhood. Reduction of density will result in less impact
than the current plan. This area will need less road and less urban services then
would be required under the current plan. The proposed designation will reduce the
potential for environmental harm in this neighborhood and are much more consistent
with maintaining this area in rural land use throughout the life of this plan. The
current comprehensive plan would have resulted in a much more urban type
neighborhood with high rural densities located near Highway 101. Such high density
near a major highway outzide the urban growth area is ineonzistent with the
retention of a high quality of rural living and would have degraded the functionality
of Highway 101 as many individual driveways would have direct highway access.
The urban Low Density designation proposed inside the urban growth area will not
have a significant impact on the environment since it merely recognizes the existing
densities developed in this area. The Urban Commercisl Center designation on the
Gun Club property and the gravel pit is similar to the existing commercial zoning in
this area but retaining large blocks of land in commerdal use could lead to a large
scale development in this neighborhood. This site is fiat and well drained, has
excellent access on Highway 101 and is presently served by PUD water.
B - 33
207
Appendix B - Final Enviror~Tnental Analysis June 13, 1995
~rx~z/~ The current 1 acre zoning in this neighborhood is inappropriate for a rural
neighborhood and would degrade the capacity of Highway 101 and lead to
deterioration of this nationally recognized scenic corridor. The proposed rural zoning
will ensure a high quality of ruxal living in those areas that remain at rural densities.
The Rural Suburban Community designations merely recognize an existing
nonconforming situation and control its spread in the future. The urban density
designations inside the urban growth area also recognize existing zoning patterns.
Overall rural densities have been reduced in this neighborhood and the
environmental impact of this change should be positive.
The street network from this area will need upgrading as more development occurs
but overall the reduced densities will reduce the road network that would have been
required if the present plan had been followed.
fl£termztive$ The present zoning is an alternative to the proposed plan. Impacts associated with
retaining the present zoning have already been discussed but they also include the
inadvisability of retaining 1 acre zoning at the edge of an urban growth area as it is
unlikely that redevelopment at urban densities could occur in a newly annexed area
developed at 1 acre density.
The Urban Commercial Center could be limited to just the areas of present
commercial zoning.
The existing 2.4 acre densities could have been retained in the area between Lake
Farm Road and Gasman Road but development at these densities would impact the
erosion hazard areas found in this portion of the neighborhood. The proposed Rural
Character Conservation designations will allow development at present densities but
the pattern of development encouraged under Rural Character Conservation will
require a lesser mileage in roads which has a beneficial impact on the environment.
This new development pattern also allows critical areas to remain in an undivided
state which enhances their potential to remain undisturbed.
~a~rou~ The Deer Park Neighborhood is located south of Highway 10! and is bounded to the
west by Morse Creek and to the east by Siebert Creek. Only a small portion of this
neighborhood is inside the urban growth area in the area near the intersection of
Deer Park Road and Highway 101. Commercial uses near Deer Park include the
Deer Park Cinema and approximately 30 acres of additional undeveloped commercial
land. View Ridge Subdivision and the upper portion of 4 Seasons Park are located on
the west side of Deer Park. Average density inside the urban growth area is greater
than 4 homes per acre while density in the rural areas would be less than 1 home per
5 acres. There are large areas of undeveloped land between Deer Park and O'Brien
Roads which provide a unique opportunity to utilized a type of Planned Unit
Development which could conserve rural character and protect critical areas to a far
greater extent than the conventional 2.4 acre and 5 acre zoning currently allowed.
The western edge of this neighbqrhood is within the boundaries of the urban growth
area. The bluff front subdivisions of View Ridge and Upper 4 Seasons Park have
I~ '
B- 34
208
Appendix B - Final Environmental Analysis June 13, 1995
been designated for urban Low Density which allows a dermity of up to 9 units per
acre. This density is similar to that already found in this area. An Urban
Commercial Center land use is designated for the lands currently for a major theater
complex and nearby vacant lands with commercial zoning. This designation will
allow for development of large scale commercial uses. _
The Lakeside Industries gravel pit bordering Siebert Creek has been designated
Commercial Forest. This designation ensures the continued use of this pit for
production of gravel as this will be a permitted use in the implementing zoning
designation.
The neighborhood contains several large wetland complexes which must be protected.
Other critical areas in the neighborhood include Bagley Creek, Siebert Creek and the
erosion hazard areas south of Township Line Road. Forest resource lands in the
southern half of this neighborhood serve to protect erosion hazard areas while
providing for productive use of the land.
The neighborhood is served by Highway 101 and the looped road system which
includes O'Brien Road, Township Line Road and Deer Park. Egress from Deer Park
Road and O'Brien Road can be hazardous. Major road improvements are scheduled in
this neighborhood and others may be needed to serve the proposed development
pattern.
Potable water is provided in the PUD and private wells. Sanitary sewers are not
available in this area which contains areas of poor soils with limitations for on-site
septic systems.
Impacts The proposed land use densities in the Deer Park Neighborhood are reduced in
several of the r~ral portions of this neighborhood. Reduction of density will result in
less environmental impact than the current plan. This area will need less road and
less urban services then would be required under the current plan. The proposed
designations will reduce the potential for environmental harm in this neighborhood
and are much more consistent with maintaining this area in rural and resource land
uses throughout the life of this plan. The current comprehensive plan would have
resulted in a much more urban type neighborhood with high rural densities located
near Highway 101. Such high density near a major highway outside the urban
growth area is inconsistent with the retention of a high quality of rural living and
would have degraded the functionality of Highway 101 as many individual driveways
would have direct highway access.
Densities bordering Highway 101 have been reduced in the proposed plan from 1
home per acre to 1 home per 2.4 acres. This reduction in density is proposed because
the committees developing the plan and public response to density issues strongly
indicate that conventional development at 1 acre density has a high level of impact
on critical areas, does not maintain rural characteristics in rural areas and creates a
.strong demand for urban type services in rural areas contrary to the goals of the
Growth Management Act.
Reduced densities have also been proposed along O'Brien Road from the current 2.4
acre densities to 5 acre densities. This density reflects the current development
pattern and reduces traffic demands along this road which is already operating at the
minimum acceptable level of service (LOS C).
B- 35
2O9
t~ City of Prat Angr~ has placed ou ~ ml~ply tap m the PUD. Tlnis tap is on a 20-ine. h
ntpply line em~_.int~g w~- thnt las be~m pmnped from the city's Elwha infiltration galk~.
~.
fncilitim et each of its wclHlelds. Th~ City of Por~ A~gaIes ~ its Elwha v~ter p~r
secondary standard and ~ Ban= we~ hu had ~ levels ~ ~e DOH secondary
At the Oism Cre~ fil~r plant the PUD has been in ~ee with the DOH SWTR for
past 11 rmmths and 11 out of~hepa~t .~.2 mo~ths. In August of 1993, t~e ttubidity t~oval was
61 percent w~ ~ below the 80 percent removal requirement of' th~ Sta~ ~ of
low (e.g., ~ thnn 0.5 NTU).
effort.
210
W~- Sym~n Pt~ A~ut~ ~
211
9. FINANCIAL ANAT~YSIS/ItA~
for fmanc~ zbe zecommem~tices con.ned in this w~te~ Sys'M~ FLu. The use of
bonds i1 the n~ommm~ed method ~o finance most of the capital impmvemmt3. It ~pemr
oa l~e 9-8. These am coly e~maU:d w{mm aud would be refined by a mm~ de~ailec
mmiysis.
10. SUlVIlVIAEY
cntmineal in a uble on page 10-1. ~ shows the ~5 PUD systems and the 5 typ
(CIP) f~r tho 2{)-year impleraemztation of {iHs pla,z'$ capiufi x~e~m~ndatinns is included
11. RECOlkilSO"~IDATIONS
B. ApPly loc a ~ gt'ant from the Depaxtmmt of Eeology to fund 50% of ~
C. AdolX a L~el 2 ~ prugram as detach'bed in $ection 8.
.D. Adopt -, pol~ and lmmcudum tu act as the satr. llil~ ~~ ~ for Cla~.
Com~.y.
F. Obtain a Water 1~i_,2~,~ Permit for 70 glza at Township ~_~,,~ P. md well
Arrange wiZh Port Ang~ to ~mraW. ly ,.~-mre ,~.ny flows going past their
Use moz-e gn:mnd~ in fail months in the PA ~ sys~z~n.
212
fo~ six Ix:ak day~ of thc yc~x. The city of Port A,q~ele~ bas a ~ right f(~ 28 cfs annual
average and 50 cfx pexkin~ fx'om their infiltration ~ on lac Elwha. They a_m presently
addithml wut~ from ti~ city ts h~draxdic, n~t warm' Eights. The h~'~ point whex'a 0xe waif)
h suppi;~ m ~bePX cmnjx~t~ ~ is off th~ ~ emi ~the source of supply on thc
Elwha. This by,~_ulic limimi~ could ~y be solved wi~ addidmal s~-agc, and
poshly nme addifimal Uanninim and purnpi~ c~maity to push wa~ throu~
Presently the Ptn:) is uin~ abom~ perc~t of hs w~,~'~- ~ght m Morac Ct~.k ~o it d°cs have
room 1o inemns~ its div~nn in onicr to meet incrmsing dcn~nds. It also has additional wa~r
di~hm poem. ~ i.s & possh~ty ~i_q would, be aptrma~ if subject to fl~e
Other ~han u~'~n~ mo~ of ~u~3~ ~ ~ docs a~t appear M be much ~ m tap
~n~ ~-~ ~ cons~ or~ ~ or c~atat, abin~, and
of a wausr~ aquif~ in th~ upper 50 to 100 f~t and two or rn~e ~ (~m~xl) ~uif~s
~h~ USGS (Dt~ lOS~), ~1 ~ ~a ~___~_- .~_ ,~;~, a ~ood ~nem una~an~tnX or
dectivod fium two repotu by P. obimo~ ami.Noble 0977 and
213
The aaalyses peffommd as part of fl~i~ study were canducaM at a levci of effot't commensut-ate
with the aeeds of = Co--ye Wamr Plan and not a si~e-speci~ fea~ilit7 study. Our
4.2 PORT ~LNGIiLI~ COMI~SITE
The ~ ~~ is sunmed from ~ prim~q~ som~ (t) Moue Creek; ('Z) mm~s wen;
and O) Port AnS~s Iatst~ (~ ~ ~-~). ~ Cr~ ~ iht CXmm PV~'s
PUD's wal~r right is L5 ~fs lank ~ and an arrays of..~ cfs nnaual divtfaion with thc
minimum ~ flow req~ of 7.~ efts. In tl~ most =xtrm~ condithan, tim is
lt~Rest ~ve~_io~ dining th~ lnwe~t flo~ months, the FOX} would be ~ about 3
flow mq~t~mem. Outing a one in lO0-y=ar cvmt ('i.e., I pc~ntt ~~y) t~ flow
hav~ to ~ comple~y cut off for two m~ths, in Sept~nnber and Oc~ots=r. ~ttting a one in 20-
of water for powur l~=mmiou purfms~ as well I~ g~ la~ 19tt0s a powar ~ala~t'was iimnll~
certain gmes ~f ~he ymr w~m the mmfldy hmrmm flow ~[ubemm~ ~m be met. These
tha~ tl~ ~rigimd ~ ri__M :fro' walm' supply ~ vms not ~ 5y mimlm.m ht.~mm flow
x~q~mmmt. Tables ~ ~ h~ App~a~ 1)-2 ~ the ~ve size o~ fl~e PUD
of the H~wha ~ w~t of Pm-t Aug~e~. ~ waU= is ~ under ~m ~m~me~ ~ the
~ cmm~y ~ 4-7 55./5sr. o3
214
No. 852b
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE
RCW Chapter 197-11-340
THIS DETERMINATION WAS WITHDRAWN ON JUNE 4~ 1999~ PER WAC 197-11-340(3)(c)
FOLLOWING THE REQUIRED 15-DAY REVIEW PERIOD. AN ADOPTION OF A PREVIOUS
DOCUMENT (#854) WAS ISSUED BY THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES FOR THE PROPOSAL
ON JUNE 4: 1999.
Description of Proposal: A proposal to revise the City's Comprehensive Plan by amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan Map extending the City's eastern Urban Growth Boundary (UGA). The
eastern UGA boundary line currently is defined as the western edge of the Morse Creek ravine. The
proposal would move that boundary east to Deer Park Road extending north of Highway 101 along
Bucannan Drive.
Applicant: MR. AND MRS. NORBERT JUHASZ
Location of Proposal (inclnding street address, if any): Deer Park Road extending north of
ltighway 101 along Buehannan Road
Lead Agency: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and
other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
[XX] This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by~ at
which time the DNS may be retained, modified, or withdrawn.
[ ] There is no comment period for this DNS.
[ ] This DNS is issued per WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period.
June 4:1999
Date Brad Collins, Planning Director
You may appeal this determination to the Port Angeles City Council through the Planning Department, 321
East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362, by submitting such written appeal to the Planning Department
no later than~Iune2~9~ You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible
Official: Brad Collins, Planning Director, Port Angeles Planning Department, 321 East Fifth Street, Port
Angeles, WA 98362, phone (360) 417-4750.
cc: Ciallarn County DCD
Tim Rymer
Andy Duran
DOE
Lar~ Byme
Pub: 6/6/99
Post: 6/4/99
Mail: 6/4/99
NO. g5:2
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE
RCW Chapter 197-11-340 -
Description of Proposal: A proposal to revise the City's Comprehensive Plan by amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan Map extending the City's eastern Urban Growth Boundary (UGA). The
eastern UGA boundary line currently is defined as the western edge of the Morse Creek ravine. The
proposal would move that boundary east to Deer Park Road extending north of Highway 101 along
Bucannan Drive.
Applicant: MR. AND MRS. NORBERT YUHASZ
Location of Proposal (including street address, if any): Deer Park Road extending north of
Highway 101 along Buchannan Road
Lead Agency: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and
other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
[XX] This DNS is issued under WAC 19%11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by~!aae,~L_l~ at
which time the DNS may be retained, modified, or withdrawn.
[ ] There is no comment period for this DNS.
[ ] This DNS is issued per WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period.
May l 8,1999 ~.4 ~------~-~---)
Date Brad Collins, Planning Director
You may appeal this determination to the Port Angeles City Council through the Planning Department, 321
East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362, by submitting such wrinen appeal to the Planning Department
no later than~ You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible
Official: Brad Collins, Planning Director, Port Angeles Planning Department, 321 East Fifth Street, Port
Angeles, WA 98362, phone (360) 417-4750.
cc: Clallam County DCD
Pub: 5/21/99
Post: 5/I 8/99
Mail: 5/18/99
216
CLALLAM COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Dmmc~oa, Bo~ lW_~ I .', I CL~L,~,4 Cotr~ry COUR~OUS~
t PoRT ANGELES, WA 98362-0149
E~,mmO~,rtvm~r~d.H~ALTHDtvlSION ~.A¥ 2 0 I~ 1360) 417-2000, FAX (360) 41%2443
PLANNING DiVISIoN/WATER QUALITY May 18, ~ 999 [ [
POR[ Ai'!CELES
Brad Collins, AICP L PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Planning Director
City of Port Angeles
P.O. Box '1'1,50
Port Angeles, WA 98362
RE: Response to proposal to move City's Eastern UGA Boundary
Dear Brad:
The purpose of this letter is to provide comments as you consider the proposal you have received to move the City's
eastern UGA boundary. As we have discussed I received this material last Friday, and it is my understanding you
will be reviewing this with your Planning Commission at their meeting on 05126199.
In summary, I believe we are in general agreement that there may be a question as to whether this application
should be processed as an amendment to your comprehensive plan at this time.
From what we discussed, and my review of the policies in the County-wide Comprehensive, the Port Angeles
Regional Plan, and the CMA, I believe it may be premature for your commission and council to be considering any
specific request that would result in an action to amend your comprehensive plan. As we agreed, it is clear that the
County has the responsibility to process this type of request and in fact, there are specific policies that outline the
boundary amendment process in our County with comprehensive plans (see attached). Furthermore, there are
process questions regarding the City's ability to assume lead agency status for any environmental review under
SEPA when the project action rests with the County.
The question that does seem appropriate for the City to examine at this point is the general policy issue of whether
there is interest in making an application to the County to amend the UGA boundary. The specifics of this particular
request are not really germane at this point; what does become relevant are the criteria specified in C.C.C.
3'1.02.250, which are attached.
Should the City determine that it is interested in pursuing this change, then we should have further discussions to lay
out the process, timeline, and potential cost-sharing arrangements for what will be a significant undertaking for both
City and County staff.
I hope this information proves helpful, and if you have any further questions, please let me know.
I would also like to request a copy of your staff report as soon as you complete it.
Sincerely,
Andy Meye~r, ICP~
Planning Director
cc: Board of Commissioners
Jim Rumpeltes
Bob Martin
correspondence
217
Chapter 31.02 Page 17
C.C.C. 31.02.240 Urban Growth Area Implementation Policies. The following policies guide
implementation of urban growth areas:
1. Annexation:
a. Annexation of lands within urban growth areas which are adjacent to existing cities should
be encouraged.
b. The cities and county, in coordination with existing and ultimate service providers, should
develop an annexation plan which includes annexation of land characterized by urban development and
a phased program of annexation consistent with the extension of services and the development of land
in accordance with the city's comprehensive plan and capital facilities plan.
c. In order to encourage continued investment in public infrastructure within urban growth
areas prior to annexation, such as roads, electrical service, water and sewer, the cities, county and other
public service providers should develop agreements which would reimburse the service provider for
capital improvements which would be acquired by the city upon annexation.
d. Annexations should form logical boundaries and not isolate service providers, either the
County or special purpose districts (PUD, fire, etc.). Cities should be prohibited from annexation 'just of
commercial/industrial tax bases without accepting responsibility for service of adjacent residential or
other non-residential areas.
e. In order to provide continuity in environmental protection, education and community
outreach, the cities should continue to work with Clallam County and other agencies in implementation of
watershed management plans and other environmental programs, if any.
f. Urban growth that requires extension of sewer or water facilities shall not be allowed within
the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area until an annexation plan has been agreed upon by the City of Port
Angeles and Clallam County and UGA Urban Services and Development Agreements have been agreed
upon by the City of Port Angeles and Clallam County Public Utility District;' provided that the City may
agree to extend the services prior to annexation upon completion of a utility extension agreement with a
developer.
2. Urban growth areas shall recognize and encourage development of historic sites within their
areas.
3. Public facilities and services necessary to support urban development will be specifically
identified for provision within the designated urban growth areas of Clallam County through regional or
sub-area comprehensive plans.
4. Urban services to be provided within UGAs should include, at a minimum, provision for
sanitary waste, solid waste disposal systems, water systems, urban roads and pedestrian facilities,
transit systems, sto,,-nv,'~ter systems, police and fire and emergency sen, ices systems, electrical and
communication systems, school and health care facilities, and neighborhood and/or community parks.
5. Urban services/facilities required to meet the needs of new development shall be prOvided, or
shall be planned to be available within six years, to meet the levels of services established for such
services within each UGA. The types of urban services/facilities and levels of service should be
established in regional or sub-area plans.
6. Urban services shall be provided and constructed in accordance with the design and
construction standards as specified in the UGA Urban Services and Development Agreement required by
the County-wide Planning policies for Joint Planning and Contiguous and Ordedy Development.
7. Services and facilities which are not available at the time of the development project giving rise
to the need for such services shall be included in a financially feasible capital facilities element of the
comprehensive plan for the city responsible for such service provision, and/or in the appropriate plans of
.the service provided.
218
Chapler 31.02
Page 18
8. Before extension or construction of urban sen/ices, the city or sen/ice provider shall
demonstrate the financial capability for continued operation of the facility.
9. The county and the cities will ensure appropriate techniques for managing future growth
consistent with the designation of urban growth areas, such as a minimum density within the UGA and a
maximum density outside the UGA. Residential densities exceeding one unit per acre should be
considered urban; however, net densities within urban growth areas should increase as urban growth and -
development occum within the UGA. Land use plans within urban growth areas should be established
toward this objective with a range of densities for relatively Iow densi(y single-family development and
some lands at a range of densities both allowing and encouraging multi-family development.
10. The County, in coordination with the adjacent city, shall consider the need for future expansion
of urban growth areas beyond the projected 20-year period required by the Growth Management Act.
Special density considerations shall be given at the edge of urban growth areas, if determined necessary
based on a land use analysis, so that future extension of urban growth areas and urban services allows
conversion to more efficient urban patterns. Special density considerations could include reduced
densities or cluster development options. Such considerations shall occur during preparation and
adoption of joint city/county comprehensive plans for the unincorporated urban growth area.
C.C.C. 31.02.250 Urban Growth Area Amendment Process. The Growth Management Act requires
that urban growth areas be revieWed at least once every ten years. The county-wide planning policies
call for a review of population growth and the impact on urban growth areas once every five years. In
setting urban growth areas for Clallam County, a forecast of 20-year urban land needs was completed.
There is a need to provide stability to where urban growth and sen/ices will occur, and supply of land
should be considered in any future amendments. This warrants that specific procedures and criteria be
adopted to guide urban growth area amendments.
It is the general policy of this section that urban growth area boundary amendments bediscouraged
except for the required ten year review. Urban growth area amendments should provide overwhelming
evidence that there is a demonstrated need to change the designations. As such, the following
procedures and criteria must be met. In those circumstances where a landowner might wish to remove
land from an urban growth area, a liberal application of the criteria should be allowed due to the
abundance of urban designated land.
1. The following procedures shall be followed in review of urban growth area amendment
applications:
a. The amendment shall be considered an amendment of the comprehensive plan. The
procedures for public notice, timing of applications and public hearings outlined in Chapter 31.07 of the
Clallam County Code shall be followed.
b. The County shall consult with the appropria, te city concerning the comprehensive plan
changes that may be needed to implement the urban growth area boundary amendment.
c. Amendment applications can bo made by Clallam County or a city with a planning area
that includes or is contiguous to the property; or the ownem of the property included in the application or
a group of more than 50 percent of the property owners who own more than 50 percent of the land area
in each area included in the application.
2. Applications for amendment of urban growth area boundaries, or the establishment of new
urba. n growth areas, shall meet the following criteria:
a. The applicant shall demonstrate that there is a need to accommodate the 20-year
population and employment growth of that area. The following information should be supplied:
(1) Revised 20-year population and/or employment forecast demonstrating increased
growth due to births, deaths and/or migration, or employment opportunities.
(2) Information pertaining to specific historical growth and employment patterns since the
last population or employment forecast provided by the County.
219
Chapter 31.02
Page 19
b. A demonstrated need for additional land to accommodate the population and/or
employment growth. The following information should be supplied:
(1) An inventory of net developable land within the existing urban growth boundary and
proposed urban growth boundary.
(2) Market availability, ownership and parcelization of net developable land within the
existing urban growth boundary and proposed urban growth boundary.
c. The amendment provides for a net improvement in the efficiency of public facilities and
services, including but not limited to, water, sewage, transportation, drainage, parks and recreation.
d. The amendment is compatible with nearby resource land (agricultural, forestry or mining)
uses.
e. The amendment meets the requirements in Section 31.02.230 for the designation of urban
growth areas.
C.C.C. 31.02.255 Urban Growth Area Locations. The following areas should be designated in the
four regional or sub-area plans as urban growth areas: Port Angeles, Sequim, Forks, Clallam Bay-Sekiu,
and Joyce.
C.C.C. 31.02.260 Rural Growth. The common image of rural lands is of an area which combines a
scenic patchwork of large open fields and woodlots interspersed with rural homesteads and serviced by
small rural commercial clusters. Rural characteristics to be maintained include Iow densities, small scale
agriculture, woodlot forestry, wildlife habitat, clean water, clean air, outdoor recreation, rural lifestyles,
and Iow traffic volumes. Rural lands in the Growth Management Act aro defined by what they aro not.
They aro not urban areas and they aro not resource lands. Groat cato must be taken to preserve rural
areas and rural characteristics so that rural quality of life for county residents can be maintained and will
not diminish as full development potentials aro achieved on rural lands.
The County-wide Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map has three general land uses (urban, rural and
forest resource). More specific land use designations within these classifications should occur through
regional or sub-area comprehensive plans. Because the character of both urban and rural lands differs
greatly from the west end of the County to the east end, specific policies and actions to implement the
Rural Land Use Element of the comprehensive plan should be found in those plans. The following
general policies should form the framework for acceptable rural elements of the regional or sub-area
plans.
1. The lands designated rural on the County's Generalized Land Use Map shall permit only those
land uses that aro compatible with the rural character of such lands and provide for a variety of rural
densities and development patterns, including the use of cluster housing concepts to encourage
conservation of open space and resource lands.
2. Regional sub-area comprehensive plans shall identify a range of rural densities appropriate for
that region. Residential density (not residential lot size) exceeding one unit per acre shall be considered
urban in nature and not allowed, with the following exceptions:
a. Development within designated rural villages or rural centers; and
b. Development within approved master planned resorts with primary focus on destination
resort'facilities consisting of short-term visitor accommodations associated with a range of developed on-
site indoor or outdoor recreational facilities.
3. Development (allowed uses and densities) within rural areas should not be counter-productive
to the intent of the Growth Management Act which encourages development to locate in urban areas
where public facilities and services can be provided in an efficient manner. Each regional or sub-aroa
plan shall include strategies that do not encourage development to occur in rural areas to the detriment
of urban areas.
220
Maintenance Commission '
673 Straitview Drive ~[~Y ~ 6 1999
Port Angeles, WA 98362
May 26, 1999 PL~,NNIr,~G ~.P,"~::'.'"
Mr. Brad Collins
Port Angeles Planning Department
321 E. Fifth St.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Dear Mr. Collins:
I question the City of Port Angeles City Council,
Planning Commission, and Planning Department's actions
(CPA 99-01 (c)) to propose revision of the Urban
Growth Area (UGA) east boundary to include the Four
Seasons Ranch, Four Seasons Park, Deer Park Road and
Buchanan Drive Commercial and Cedar Park areas.
I submit that the County Comprehensive Plan takes
priority for the City's Plan; however, you have taken
action to usurp the County Plan. Any project proposal
in the City must be consistent with the goals of the
County Comprehensive Plan and this proposal would
extend the UGA outside the current city limits.
The applicants petitioned Clallam County to change the
zone two or three years ago in order to build a motel
and resort complex; however, after extensive public
hearings the County determined to deny their request.
Please review the County's decision regarding the
applicants' previous request.
At those public hearings, per the community's request,
I expressed concern regarding the potential damage to
our community resulting from water runoff from parking
lots; watering of lawns; and effluent from the sewer
runoff from the bluff which would increase the danger
of landslides, contamination of our properties and
contamination of Morse Creek (remember Federal, State
and local efforts to increase the salmon population).
Please be aware of your responsibility under the State
221
Environmental Policy Act (RCW 43.1c) before approving
CPA 99-01(C) .
Landslides have already occurred within our community
and the major increase in water runoff from parking
lots will add to the danger of more landslides. The
stratification of the bluff is such that contaminated
water from parking lots and sewage runoff will come
onto Four Seasons Ranch and Morse Creek.
Annexation of the proposed extension of the UGAwill
not occur for many years; therefore, services will not
be provided to areas impacted by the extension. Will
the City Council approve one family's application over
the potential adverse impact to numerous other home-
owners and businesses?
Please review the budget to ensure that your planned
development in the proposed urban growth area will
provide adequate p,,hlic facilities and services. Can
the City provide sewers to our community? Morse Creek
is a very expensive barrier in provision of sewers.
Property rights of landowners need to be protected
from arbitrary and discriminatory actions. I submit
that your proposal was made arbitrarily without
consulting the County Planning Department. I firmly
believe that landowners/citizens and County/City
governments need to sit down and review the process to
ensure compliance with the County Comprehensive Plan.
Sincerely~
cc: Port Angeles City Council Clallam County Commissioners
Bob Martin, Director Community Development
Andy Meyer, Director Planning Clallam County
File
222
243 Cedar Park Dr.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Mr. Brad Collins 26 May 99
Port Angeles Planning Dept.
321 E. Fifth St.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
RE: CPA 99-01 (C)
We are adamantly opposed to this proposal to extend the Urban Growth Area (UGA)
eastward to encompass our rural neighborhood. It makes it sound like we would be living
in a virtual Utopia, sidewalks, street lights, sewers, bus transportation, etc., etc. However,
Port Angeles does not supply many of these services to much of its existing UGA!
Specifically:
Growth Management Goal A No. 1
While it is true that lot sizes in the proposed area are relatively small they are
considerably larger than most city lots, and the nature of the area is definitely rural.
Growth Management Element Goal A Policy No. :2
I am sure that the population of Clallam County has grown in the last several years
but not in this area. One new house in our neighborhood and one new business south of
Hwy. 101. Also this proposal would do nothing to improve the treatment of waste water
in this area, and in fact the underlying reason for this proposal would increase waste water
discharge tenfold. Morse Creek Valley creates a very expensive barrier to providing
sewers in our area.
Growth Management Element Goal A No. 3
It may appear to the City that they are working with the County, but to us it would
appear that the City is usurping County Authority.
Growth Management Element Goal A No. 4
We have already explained that our area is Rural in Nature, we see wildlife daily on
our property that would rarely if ever be seen in an Urban Area.
223
Growth Management Element Goal A Policy//5
The City does not even now provide Urban Services/Facilities to all its present
UGA.
Growth Management Element Goal A Policy//6
Whether our area is inside or out of the Port Angeles UGA we will not be provide
Urban Services/Facilities in the foreseeable future. Unrealistically expensive. (and see
above//5)
Growth Management Element Goal A Policy//7
Once again our area is Rural in Nature. If you take all the open ground along each
side of Morse Creek Valley and add that to the developed property it would probably
exceed Urban Density Designation. Port Angeles is having problems supplying sewer,
sidewalk, street lights to its existing UGA.
Growth Management Element Goal A Policy//16
I check with some of the "old timers" in town. There hasn't been a Chinook
Salmon in Morse Creek in 50 years. And if there were why would we want an agency to
protect it that allows Wal Mart to dump its parking lot runoff directly into the Creek?
(After failure of their retention pond filter system)
Growth Management Element Goal A Policy #17
We believe the County protects private property rights just as well as the City. We
do not think the City allows Commercial Development in the Residential areas on property
not zoned for the development. Nor does the County.
Growth Management Element Goal A Objective 1
There is certainly no reason the City should not review its Comprehensive Plan
from time to time.
Land Use Element Goal A Policy 1 & 2
At the time the City's UGA Boundary was set the County planners determined that
there was sufficient vacant Commercial land available in Port Angeles to last for 20 years
not counting redevelopment that would take place. We have not seen any great
commercial building boom in Port Angeles since that time. We draw your attention to
K Mart.
Growth Management Element Goal A Policy//8 & 9
The City was correct that the physical features of Morse Creek make it very
difficult and expensive to provide urban services to our area. We have already addressed
the point of having the City protect the environment. Of greater concern is the report
from the Port Angeles Fire Dept. regarding response times for Fire/EMS service, and level
of service.
224
Growth Management Element Goal A Policy #11
The area in question does not want or need City services and the City would have
a difficult time providing them.
Growth Management Element Goal A Policy #12,13,14 & 15
It is one thing to say that the City is responsible to provide all the services one
expects when living in a City; o quite another to provide them.
This proposal is put forward by one couple out of the hundreds who live in the
area. We like things the way they are. Everyone knows they have a hidden agenda, and
since they apparently cannot get what they want from the County, have turned to the City.
Once again it seems to us the City has taken over County Authority.
Our area is Rural in Nature, no matter what the density. We think we would see a
deterioration in service compared to what we now receive from the County. The promise
of full Urban Services/Facilities is simply unrealistic. We do not want to be within the
Port Angeles UGA, and ask that this proposal be rejected.
For Cedar Park Residence Association
cc: Port Angeles City Council
Ciallam County Commissioners
Bob Martin - Director Community Development
Andy Meyer - Director Planning Ciallam County
225
226
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
P.O. sox
SEQUIM, WA 98382
360-683-3737
June 8, 1999
Brad ~llins, AICP
Planning Dir~or
C~ of Po~ Angeles
P.O. ~x 1150
Po~Angeles, WA 98362
RE: Revision of U~n G~h Ar~ Ea~em ~unda~ Line
CPA 9~1(C)
Dear Mr. ~llins:
As a property owner within the area proposed to be included within the UGA I would submit the
following comments:
After speaking with staff yesterday I assumed the proposal was the same as proposed
by Clallam County back in 1995. After reviewing the Staff Report dated 5-26-99, I see that the
description of the proposed boundary is different than the map marked as attachment B.
Specir~.ally the description describes the area as including all of the General Commercial zone
south 101 and east of Deer Park Rd, but the map does not include all of the GC zone. The
south boundary of the GC zone runs along Teny Mills Road which is approximately 800 fee{
south of the proposed UGA line on attachment B. I request that this map be changed to
include all of the General Commercial zone. I would further request that the description and
map of the proposed UGA be changed to include the balance of our contiguous ownership
south of the GC zone. I have attached a copy of attachment B showing the areas described
above.
As the owner of approximately 100 acres within this proposal I am basically in favor of
this proposal moving forward and ultimately becoming a part of the Port Angeles UGA. My
concerns will be regarding any development regulations more stringent than current county
regulations, any requirements to extend city services (ie sewer) prior to development, how we
will be able to develop prior to city services being extended to the area?
Would you please contact me so we might meet prior the 15~ of June and discuss this
proposal and the questions I have outlined above.
Sincerely,
Mark D. Smith~''~
General Partner
MDS/md
227
JUHASZ Compreher *ye Plan Amendment Propose*
1999
Bxis lng Boundary .
(western boundary o~F
Morse Creek Canyon) Pro Boun y
NT 8
Four Seasons Ranch
Maintenance Commission
673 Straitview Drive
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Mr. Brad Collins
Port Angeles Planning Department
321 E. Fifth St.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Dear Mr. Collins:
This is in response to the City of Port Angeles
Determination of Completeness and Notice of Develop-
ment Application and ~3blic Hearing to relocate the
City's eastern boundary line from the western edge to
the eastern edge of the Morse Creek Ravine in the area
of Deer Park Road extending north of Highway 101
published May 28, 1999. I question the City of Port
Angeles City Council, Planning Commission, and
Planning Department's actions to extend the Urban
Growth Area (UGA) east boundary to include the Four
Seasons Ranch, Four Seasons Park, Deer Park Road and
Buchanan Drive Commercial and Cedar Park areas.
I submit that the County Comprehensive Plan takes
priority over the City's Plan just as does the U.S.
Constitution over the State Constitution; however, you
have taken action to usurp the County Plan. Any
project proposal to extend the UGA and application for
development must be consistent with the goals of the
County Comprehensive Plan.
The applicants petitioned Clallam County to change the
zone several years ago in order to build a motel and
resort complex; however, after extensive public
hearings the County denied their request. Please
review the County's decision regarding the applicants'
previous request.
229
At those p~,hlic hearings and at the public hearing
held May 26, 1999, I expressed concern regarding the
potential damage to our community from commercial
development in Cedar Park resulting from parking lot
water runoff; watering of lawns; and effluent from the
sewer runoff from the bluff which would increase the
danger of landslides, contamination of our properties
and contamination of Morse Creek (remember Federal,
State and local efforts to increase the salmon
population). Please be aware of your responsibility
under the State Environmental Policy Act (RCW 43.1c) .
Landslides have already occurred within our community
and the major increase in water runoff from parking
lots will add to the danger of more landslides. The
stratification of the bluff is such that contaminated
water from parking lots and sewage runoff will come
onto Four Seasons Ranch and Morse Creek.
For the above reasons, it is imperative that an
Environmental Impact Study be completed prior to any
approval of the proposal to amend the UGA and develop-
ment application requested by the applicants. Will
the City Council approve one family's application over
the potential adverse impact to numerous other
homeowners and business owners who are registered
voters?
Annexation of the proposed extension of the UGAwill
not occur for many years; therefore, services will not
be provided to areas impacted. Please be aware that
property rights of landowners must be protected from
arbitrary and discriminatory actions.
Sincerely, /~
Andy~an, President
cc: Port Angeles City Council Clallam County Commissioners
Bob Martin, Director Community Development
Andy Meyer, Director Planning Clallam County
File
230
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
· DATE: May 26, 1999
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
FILE #: CPA 99-01(D)
APPLICANT: City of Port Angeles
OWNER: City-wide
LOCATION: City-wide
REQUEST: Revise the five Planning Areas to create a sixth Planning Area with the
purpose of coordinating statistical areas with proposed new Census Tracts
and furore annexation areas in the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area (UGA).
BACKGROUND:
Proposed Project
The City and Clallam County staff working on the Census 2000 determined that there was an
opportunity to change the Port Angeles area census tracts to reflect changes in the development pattern
and identifiable boundaries that have occurred over the considerable time since the Census Tracts
were last revised. The 1994 Comprehensive Plan for the City of Port Angeles established five
Planning Areas that could be used in identifying different areas of the community and potential
neighborhood subareas. Since the Planning Areas and Census Tracts were nearly coincidental, there
was a rationale for modifying each to be even more coincidental for future statistical analysis purposes.
The primary change in the Census Tract boundaries was to conform to the Planning Area boundaries,
and where a Census Tract boundary requirement was paramount the Planning Area boundary was
modified. To fit within allowable Census Tract population ranges and considering future populations
that may be annexed into the City, a new East Planning Area based on population distributions east
of Race Street was created, and the North Central Planning Area was slightly modified to follow the
Tumwater Track Route on the west and Lauridsen Boulevard on the south. (See Planning Areas map,
Attachment A.)
231
CPA 9~OI(D) Page
Location and Existing Development
The entire City is covered by the proposed Planning Areas, and the boundaries anticipate inclusion
of the Urban Growth Areas in the future of the East, South Central, and Southwest Planning Areas.
The primary boundaries between Planning Areas are major arterials and the marine bluff.-
Neighborhood subareas such as above and below the Boulevard between the North Central and South
Central and west of the 8th Street bridges and north of Airport and Lincoln Park for the Northwest
Planning Area may be fairly easy to identify. The new boundary at Race Street (and Heart of the Hills
Parkway) may be okay south of Lauridsen Boulevard but less so north of there. Previously there was
no east boundary for the North Central Planning Area, other than the City Limits, which included
subareas that were not well connected to the North Central neighborhood subareas. An alternate
North Central boundary of Lauridsen Boulevard east to White's Creek Ravine did not work for Census
Tracts revisions within the existing City Limits. Since Lauridsen Boulevard and Race Street are
planned in the Comprehensive Plan as major arterials, it was expected that they would be even more
definable Planning Area boundaries in the future.
DISCUSSION:
Environmental Review
The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on May 18, 1999.
This action fulfills the City's responsibility under SEPA.
Comprehensive Plan
The Comprehensive Plan establishes the long range goals and policies of the City. It is the basis upon
which City officials are to make land use decisions. Any project proposed in the City must be
consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Designation
The City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates residential land uses that form
neighborhood subareas in all Planning Areas except the Southwest Planning Area, which currently
encompasses the William Fairchild International Airport and Lincoln Park and has little residence
population inside the City Limits.
Goals and Policies
The Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Policies have been reviewed with regards to the proposed
application and the following policies appear to be the most relevant to the proposal.
Growth Management Element, Goal A. To manage growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial
to the community as a whole, is sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals and is consistent with
the State of Y~ashington's Growth Management Act.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 1. In all its actions and to the extent consistent
with the provisions of this comprehensive plan, the City shah strive to implement the following goals
of the State Growth Management ~4ct:
232
a. Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and
services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner.
b. Reduce sprawl Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling,
low-density development.
c. Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on
regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans.
d Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the
population. Promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage
preservation of existing housing stock.
e. Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the region that is
consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity, especially for
unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, and encourage growth in areas experiencing
insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the region's natural resources,
public services and public facilities.
f Property rights. Private property shall not be taken for pubfic use without just compensation
having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and
discriminatory actions.
g. Permits. AppBcations for both state and local government permits shouM be processed in
a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability.
h. Natural resource industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource-based industries,
including productive timber, agricultural, and. fisheries industries.
i. Open space and recreation. Encourage the retention of open space and development of
recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural
resource lands and water, and develop parks.
j. Environment. Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including
air and water quality, and the availability of water.
k. Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the
planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to
reconcile conflicts.
L Public.facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to
support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development
is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally
established minimum standards.
m. Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites and structures
that have historical or archaeological significance.
233
CPA 99-01(])) Page
The proposed Planning Areas recognize the neighborhood subarea development patterns that
have evolved and are supported by land use policies.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 2. The Port Angeles Urban Growth Area
(PA UGA) shouM be established based at a minimum upon land use demand as determined by the-
Clallam County 20-year population forecast for Clallam County and specified sub-areas, so long
as the county-wide forecast is not less than the most recent forecasts available from the State Office
of Financial Management.
The population growth in Clallam County has exceeded the forecasts from the State Office
of Financial Management since the Growth Management Act was enacted. If growth is
directed to the County's urban growth areas, the City should plan to maintain exiisting
residential neighborhoods and to accommodation new residential development in urban
growth areas adjacent to the East, South Central, and Southwest Planning Areas.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 3. The City shall work with the County to develop
an annexation plan which allows the annexation of land characterized by urban development and
which is consistent with the extension of services and the land development policies oft he City's
Comprehensive Plan and Capital Facilities Plan.
The City and the County are working together to complete an annexation study of the eastern
Port Angeles UGA. It may be sometime before annexations and residential development take
place south and west of the City Limits.
Growth Management Element, GoaI A, Policy No. 4. The City should work with the County to ensure
appropriate techniques for managing future growth consistent with the urban density, such as a
minimum density within the PA UGA and a maximum density outside the PA UGA. A range of
densities should be provided by the City for lands within the PA UGA, including some lands for
relatively low density single-family development and some lands at a range of densities both
allowing and encouraging multi-famdy development.
The Planning Areas anticipate such future growth and annexation to the City.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 5. Urban services/facilities shall be provided
consistent with the Capital Facilities Element.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 6. The City shouM work with the County and
other service providers to determine the appropriate levels of service for such facilities and services
and to ensure consistency between service provision within the City, the PA UGA, and the County.
Urban services/facilities will be planned through the City's Capital Facilities Plan for the
subareas in the City's UGA.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 7. The City's preferred policy is to recognize a
density of one unit per acre as urban/suburban and to use this density as the demarcation between
urban and rural for purposes of establishing or amending the PA UGA; however, the City will
continue to discuss this issue with the County with the goal of arriving at a consistent City/County
policy prior to finalization of the UGA.
234
The existing densities in the Planning Areas and the UGA exceed those designated as urban
in character.
Growth Management Element, Goal ,4, Policy No. 8. The P,4UGA should include areas
characterized by urban growth adjacent to the existing City bou _rd__aries and should take into account'
the area's physical features.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 9. Land designated for commercial or industrial
uses which encourage adjacent urban development shah be located within the PA UGA.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 10. The amount of acreage designated for
commercial, industrial, or other non-residential uses within the PA UGA shall be based upon the
Land Use Element and Economic Development Element in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 11. The PA UGA shouM be established to avoid
critical areas, unless addressed as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and to exclude resource
lands.
These rationales for sizing the UGA for the City of Port Angeles are consistent with the
proposed Planning Areas.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 12. Urban services to be provided within the
PA UGA shouM include, at a minimum, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste collection/disposal
systems, water systems, urban roads and pedestrian facilities, street cleaning services, transit
systems, stormwater systems, police and fire and emergency services systems, electrical and
communication systems, school and health care facilities, and neighborhood and/or community
parks.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 13. The City shouM be the ultimate provider of
urban services within the City limits and the PA UGA for those services the City provides except to
the extent otherwise provided in a UGA Urban Services and Development Agreement that is reached
pursuant to the County-Wide Planning Policy.
Growth Management Element, GoaI A, Policy No. 14. Urban services~facilities for which the City
is the ultimate provider should be provided and constructed to meet the design and construction
standards of the City.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 15. The City or service provider shouM
demonstrate the financial capability for continued operation of the facility following construction.
The Planning Areas are consistent with the distribution of urban facilities and services and fit
subarea service areas within the City.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 16. Regulations to protect critical areas which
occur within the PA UGA shouM be developed to ensure protection of such areas.
The City's Planning Areas recognize and follow natural boundaries, which in turn will afford
protection to such areas for preservation of open space as separation between Planning Areas.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Policy No. 1Z All development regulations shall be2 3
CPA99-0~(D) ~ 6
promulgated with due regard for private property rights in order to avoid regulatory takings or
violation of due process and to protect property rights of landowners from arbitrary and
discriminatory actions.
The City has promulgated regulations to protect private property rights. The proposed'
Planning Areas will help neighborhood subareas maintain existing development patterns and
residential character.
Growth Management Element, Goal A, Objectivel. The City will continue its efforts to comply in
a timely manner with the requirements of the State Growth Management Act.
The proposal is consistent with the annual review of the City's Comprehensive Plan and by
coordination with the revisions to Census Tracts boundaries will facilitate statistical analysis
of growth patterns.
Land Use Element, Goal A. To guide current and future development within the City in a manner
that provides certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the
challenges and opportunities of the future.
Land Use Element, Goal A, Policy 1. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map shouM be used as
a conceptual guide for determining current and long range zoning and other land use decisions.
The map's land use designations are intended to show areas where general land use types are
allowed. The area between land use designations shouM be considered an imprecise margin in
order to provide flexibility in determining the boundary of such areas. When determining
appropriate zoning designations for an area near a margin, the goals, policies and objectives of the
Land Use Element should take precedence.
Land Use Element, Goal A, Policy 2. All land use decisions and approvals made by the City
Council and/or any of its appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan and its land use map.
Land Use Element, Goal B. To have a community where residential development and use of the
land are done in a manner that is compatible with the environment, the characteristics of the use
and the users, and the desired urban design of the City.
Land Use Element, Goal C. To have a community of viable districts and neighborhoods with a
variety of residential opportunities for personal interaction, ful. fillment and enjoyment, attractive
to people of aH ages, characteristics and interests.
Land Use Element, Goal C, Policy 1. Residential land shouM be developed on the district and
neighborhood concept. Although such districts may be composed primarily of residential uses of
a uniform density, a healthy, viable district shouM be composed of residential uses of varying
densities which may be augmented by subordinate and compatible uses. Single family and multi-
family homes, parks and open-spaces, schools, churches, day care and residential services, home
occupations, and district shopping areas are all legitimate components of district development and
enhancement. A neighborhood shouM be primarily composed of low, medium, or high density
housing.
236
CPA ~9-OI(D)
Land Use Element, Goal E. To provide shopping opportunities which meet the needs of all CiO,
residents and v~sitors in safe, usable shopping areas that are compatible with the surrounding area
and uses, the environment, and the desired urban design of the City.
lzmd Use Element, Goal E. Policy 7. District shopping areas shouM be located at the intersections-
of arterial streets of sufficient size to satisfy traffic demand and at the boundaries of neighborhoods
so that more than one neighborhood may be served
Planning Areas were established in the 1994 Comprehensive Plan to facilitate subarea
planning as a means for improving the land use planning and development review processes.
These minor revisions to boundaries and the creation of a new East Planning Area only
improve the potential for neighborhood plans to implement Comprehensive Plan goals and
policies.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA 99-
01 (D) to the City Council based on the following findings and conclusions.
Findings
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01 (D), (including
all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public hearing, and the
Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission
hereby finds that:
1. All information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01 (D), (including all
of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public hearing, and the
Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation have been considered in this decision and
is considered a part thereof.
2. This proposal applies city-wide, and the boundaries are shown on a revised Planning Areas
Map (Attachment A).
3. The City and Clallam County staff working on the Census 2000 determined that there was an
opportunity to change the Port Angeles area census tracts to reflect changes in the
development pattern and identifiable boundaries that have occurred over the considerable time
since the Census Tracts were last revised. The primary change in the Census Tract boundaries
was to conform to the Planning Area boundaries, and where a Census Tract boundary
requirement was paramount the Planning Area boundary was modified.
4. The 1994 Comprehensive Plan for the City of Port Angeles established five Planning Areas
that could be used in identifying different areas of the community and potential neighborhood
subareas.
5. To fit within allowable Census Tract population ranges and considering future populations
that may be annexed into the City, a new East Planning Area based on population distributions
east of Race Street was created, and the North Central Planning Area was slightly modified to
follow the Tumwater Truck Route on the west and Lauridsen Boulevard on the south.
237
CPA 99-01 (D) Page g
6. The boundaries anticipate inclusion of the Urban Growth Areas in the future of the East, South
Central, and Southwest Planning Areas.
7. The primary boundaries between Planning Areas are major arterials and the marine bluff.
8. Previously there was no east boundary for the North Central Planning Area, other than the City
Limits, which included subaxeas that were not well connected to the North Central
neighborhood subareas.
9. Lauridsen Boulevard and Race Street are planned in the Comprehensive Plan as major
arterials.
10. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) on May
18, 1999. This action fulfills the City's responsibility under SEPA.
11. This is an areawide Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and public notice was provided by legal
notice published in the Peninsula Daily News.
12. The Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies idenitified as being the most relevant to the
proposal were Growth Management Element Goal A, Policies A 1-17, Objective A-1, Land
Use Element Goal A, Policies A 1-2, Land Use Element Goal B, Land Use Element Goal C,
Policy C 1, Land Use Element Goal E, and Policy E 7.
Conclusions
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01 (D), (including
all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public hearing, the Planning
Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed findings, the City of Port Angeles
Planning Commission hereby concludes the following:
A. Since the Planning Areas and Census Tracts were nearly coincidental, it rational to modify
each to be even more coincidental for future statistical analysis purposes.
B. Neighborhood subareas such as above and below the Boulevard between the North Central
and South Central and west of the 8th Street bridges and north of Airport and Lincoln Park for
the Northwest Planning Area are fairly easy to identify.
C. The new boundary at Race Street (and Heart of the Hills Parkway) is okay south of Lauridsen
Boulevard but less so north of there. An alternate North Central boundary of Lauridsen
Boulevard east to White's Creek Ravine does not work for Census Tracts revisions within the
existing City Limits. Since Lauridsen Boulevard and Race Street are planned in the
Comprehensive Plan as major arterials, it is expected that they will be even more definable
Planning Area boundaries in the future.
D. The proposed Planning Area revisions follow the development patterns and physical features
that separate the community into identifiable neighborhood subareas and logical urban service
areas.
E The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan,
specifically those listed in Finding 12.
238
CPA 99-01(D) Pag~ 9
F. The revised Planning Areas are in the public interest.
This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council.
CPA9901.D
239
240
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
APPLICATION FORM
P~ A~: Deadline date for application is March 31, 1999.
1. APPLICANT CITY OF PORT ANGELES
P.O. Box 1150, Port Angeles, WA 98362
DAYTHVIEPHONE ¢36o~ 417-4750
2. PROPOSEDCOMPP~tPNSXVEPLANTEXT/MAPCHANGE(BespecificnotingPlan
po~cy~tatiorts.) See attached draft planninR area bo,]ndary man
(revised Comprehensive Plan Map
3. JUSTIFICATION/REASON FOR CHANGE: Th~. City ha~ h~o,
cooperatively with Clallam County to revise Census Tract boundaries
for the 2000 Census. A primary consideration for the Census Tract
boundary changes was the Comprehensive Plan planning area boundaries.
However, adjustment in the planning area boundaries is necessary to
meet Census Tract requirements and are, therefore, proposed. The
data for both census and City planning purposes will be easier to
compile and use if the Census Tracts and planning area boundaries
coincide as much as possible. The neighborhood/district planning
area concepts and policies of the Comprehensive Plan will not be
compromised by the proposed planning area boundar<,, chan~es.
~ ~' ~ if n~)
Sign~
R~'~y:
FUe fi:
241
.-IL~
i cz~ or FC~T ~rsl ~:,..z I
~usuc wo~s L I I
~~ooo PLANNING AREA MAP
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE
RCW Chapter 19%11-340
Description of Proposal: A proposal to update the Comprehensive Plan Map Transportatior~
Services and Facilities Plan Map (TSFP) to correctly identify certain street classifications within the
City limits, and to amend the City's Planning Areas consistent with Census boundaries in the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
Applicant: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Location of Proposal (including street address, if any): City wide
Lead Agency: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and
other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
[ ] This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by
at which time the DNS may be retained, modified, or withdrawn.
[ ] There is no comment period for this DNS.
[XX ] This DNS is issued per WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period.
May 18, 1999 t ~/'"~ 'O~'
Date Br~d Collins~ Planning Director
You may appeal this determination to the Port Angeles City Council through the Planning Department, 321
East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362, by submitting such written appeal to the Planning Department
no later than~ You should be prepared to make specific hemal objections. Responsible
Official: Brad Collins, Planning Director, Port Angeles Planning Department, 321 East Fifth Street, Port
Angeles, WA 98362, phone (360) 417-4750.
Pub: 5/21/99
Post: 5/I 8/99
Mail: 5/I 8/09
243
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
906 Columbia St. SW · PO Box 48300 · Olympia, Washington 98504.8300 · (360) 753.2200
Monday, May 24, 1999 ..... : ~
MAY 2 ? 1999 ','
PORT ANGELES
Iq. AN,.NIN~ DEPARTMENT
Sue Roberds ~ ~-
321 E Fifth
Port Angeles , WA 98362
Re: Draft Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Dear Ms. Roberds:
Thank you for sending this department your draft comprehensive plan amendment.
We received the notice on May 21, 1999 and forwarded a copy of the notice to other state agencies. If
you have not sent the plan to the agencies on the list (enclosed), please do so.
We will forward all comments from other state agencies to you.
If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at 753-2951.
Since. rely,
Michael Nowak
Gro~h Management Planner
Gm~ Management Se~ices
Enclosure
244
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
C~ CO~C~ ~EMO
DATE: June 15, 1999
TO: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCm
FROM: Jack Pittis, Director of Public Works & Utilities
StmJECT: Adoption of a Street Classifications Ordinance revising arterial and access streets
Issue: Should City Council adopt a Street Classifications Ordinance revising the arterial and access
streets to conform with the recommendations of the adopted Transportation Services and Facilities
Pll21mmendation: Council adopt the attached Street Classifications Ordinance revising the
:ity arterial and access street designations.
- Background / Analysis:
The City's Transportation Services and Facilities Plan (TSFP) adopted earlier by City Council
contained recommended revisions to the City Street classifications to bring the City Streets into
conformance with current and furore uses. A copy of the updated map showing the City's Street
Classification as recommended by the TSFP is attached.
The attached ordinance repeals the prior ordinance and adopts a new Chapter 11.02 of the Port
Angeles Municipal Code. Adoption of the ordinance will allow inclusion of the recommended
revisions in the update of the City's Comprehensive Plan and preparation of accurate maps depicting
the City's street system.
Attachments: Ordinance
~: N:~W~NO~EERX~~E~TO~.~D
File: S~
245
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, updating the
classifications and designations of City streets, repealing Ordinance 1928,
and adopting a new Chapter 11.02 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. A new Chapter 11.02 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code is hereby adopted
to read as follows:
Chapter 11.02
STREET CLASSIFICATIONS
Sections:
11.02.010 Purpose
11.02.020 Definitions
11.02.030 Principal Arterials
11.02.040 Minor Arterials
11.02.050 Collector Arterials
11.02.010 Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to classify and designate streets
within the City of Port Angeles as either principal arterials, minor arterials, collector arterials, or
access streets, consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Circulation Plan and with the State-
wide National Functional Classification System.
11.02.020 Definitions.
A. "Access streets" shall include all streets within the City, which are not designated
in this Chapter as principal, minor, or collector arterials and which generally have
the following characteristics:
1. Permit direct access to abutting land uses;
2. Connect to higher class street systems;
3. Have a low level of mobility;
4. Discourage through traffic movement;
5. Consist often to thirty percent of travel volume and sixty-five to eighty
percent of street mileage.
-1-
246
B. "Arterials" or "arterial highways" shall include, for the purposes of RCW
46.04.030 and RCW 47.04.010(2), in all courts, but not by limitation, the princi-
pal arterials, minor arterials, and collector arterials designated in this Chapter.
C. "Collector arterials" shall include those streets designated in PAMC 11.02.050,
which streets generally have the following characteristics:
1. Provide land access and street circulation within residential, commercial,
and industrial areas;
2. Distribute trips fi.om the arterial system to ultimate destinations and vice
versa;
3. Consist of five to ten percent of travel volume and five to ten percent of
street mileage.
D. "Minor arterials" shall include those streets designated in PAMC 11.02.040,
which streets generally have the following characteristics:
1. Interconnect and augment principal arterials;
2. Serve trips of shorter distance and lower level' of mobility than principal
arterials;
3. Have more emphasis on land access;
4. Do not usually penetrate identifiable neighborhoods;
5. Consist of five to forty percent of travel volume and five to twenty
percent of street mileage.
E. "Principal arterials" shall include those streets designated in PAMC 11.02.030,
which streets generally have the following characteristics:
1. Serve major centers of activity and highest traffic volume corridors;
2. Serve most trips entering or leaving urban area;
3. Serve significant intra-urban travel between major suburban or business
districts;
4. Have fully and/or partially controlled access;
5. Consist of forty to sixty-five percent of travel volume and five to ten
percent of street mileage.
11.02.030 Principal Arterials. The following streets and parts of streets within the City
are hereby designated as principal arterial streets:
1. Front Street from Golf Course Road to Lincoln Street.
2. First Street from Lincoln Street to east City limits.
3. Lincoln Street from Front Street to Lauridsen Boulevard.
4. Lauridsen Boulevard from Lincoln Street to Cherry Street.
5. State Highway 101 from Cherry Street to west City limits.
6. Race Street from Front Street to Mt. Angeles Road.
-2-
247l
11.02.040 Minor Arterials. The following streets and parts of streets within the City ..
.re hereby designated as minor arterial streets:
1. 8* Street from Race Street to "C" Street.
2. "C" Street from 8~ Street to Lauridsen Boulevard.
3. Lauridsen Boulevard from Lincoln Street to Race Street.
4. Front Street from Lincoln Street to Cherry Street.
5. First Street from Lincoln Street to Valley Street.
6. Marine Drive from Cherry Street to Tumwater Track Route (SR-117).
7. Tumwater Truck Route (SR-117) from Marine Drive to south City limits.
8. Golf Course Road from First Street to Bonneville Power Administration
easement.
9. Furore White's Creek crossing from Race Street to Golf Course Road.
11.02.050 Collector Arterials. The following streets and parts of streets within the City
tre hereby designated as collector medal streets:
1. Chambers Street from Front Street to 8' Street.
2. Golf Course Road from Bonneville Power Administration easement to
south City limits.
3. Mt. Angeles Road from Heart of Hills parkway to south City limits.
4. Ennis Street from former Rayonier mill site to Lauridsen Boulevard.
5. Eunice Street from 8~ Street to Lauridsen Boulevard.
6. Fairmont Avenue from SR-101 to Lauridsen Boulevard.
7. Peabody Street from Front Street to Ahlvers Road.
8. Old Mill Road from Ahlvers Road to south City limits.
9. Laurel Street from Lauridsen Boulevard to Ahlvers Road.
10. Cherry Street from 2~a Street to 15' Street.
11. Valley Street from First Street to 2~a Street.
12. Pine Street from 8' Street to south City limits.
13. Pine Street extension from Pine Street to SR-101.
14. Cedar Street from Marine Drive to 8' Street.
15. Tumwater Street from Marine Drive to 5* Street.
16. "C" Street from 5t~ Street to 8* Street.
17. 'T' Street from 5t~ Street to 16~ Street.
18. "L" Street from 4' Street to 5* Street.
19. "M" Street from 4th Street to 18* Street.
20. "N" Street from 4* Street to 18~' Street.
21. "L" Street from 18* Street to Lauridsen Boulevard.
22. Milwaukee Drive from "N" Street to west City limits.
23. 2~a Street from Cherry Street to Marine Drive.
24. Marine Drive from Tumwater Truck Route to Daishowa America mill
site.
25. Ediz Hook Road from Daishowa America mill site to Coast Guard air
station.
26. Hill Street from Marine Drive to "L" Street.
-3-
248
27. 4~ Street from "L" Street to "bi" Street.
28. 5~ Street from Ennis Street to Cherry Street.
29. 5~ Street from Tumwater Street to "L" Street.
30. 8t~ Street from "C" Street to 'T' Street.
31. 8~ Street from Race Street to Chambers Street.
32 10t~ Street from 'T' Street to Milwaukee Drive.
33 "O" Street from 10t~ Street to 18~ Street.
34 Campbell Avenue from Mt. Angeles Road to Porter Street.
35 Porter Street from Campbell Avenue to Park Avenue.
36 16t~ Street from "C" Street to 'T' Street.
37 18t~ Street from 'T' Street to City landfill.
38 Lauridsen Boulevard from Tumwater Track Route to west City limits.
39 Lauridsen Boulevard from Race Street to Ennis Street.
40 Park Avenue from Laurel Street to Liberty Street.
41 Liberty Street from Park Avenue to Lauridsen Boulevard.
42. Ahlvers Road from Laurel Street to Peabody Street.
43. 15~ Street from Cherry Street to Lauridsen Boulevard.
44. Future Airport Road from Lauridsen Boulevard to south City limits.
Section 2 Repealer. Ordinance 1928 is hereby repealed.
Section 3 Severability. If any provisions of this Ordinance, or its application to any
~erson or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, or application of the
>rovisions of the Ordinance to other persons or circumstances, is not affected.
Section 4 Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after the date of
~ublication.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
2,ouncil held on the ~ day of ,1999.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary
-4-
2491
250
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
June 15, 1999
cwY MEET NO SCheDULE l DATE IT[ME
:
Landfill Benefit "Dump Day" Sunday June 13 9:00- 3:00
City Council Meeting Tuesday, June 15 6:00 p.m.
Real Estate Committee Wednesday, June 16 8:15 a.m.
Solid Waste Advisory Meeting Thursday, June 17 3:00 p.m.
AWC Conference [Wenatchee] June 22-25 All day
Downtown Forward Monday, June 28 7:00 a.m.
EIwha Morse Management Team Monday, June 28 7:00 p.m.
Gateway Steering Committee (City Hall) Thursday, July I 8:15 a.m.
WRIA Coordinating Council Thursday, July 1 10:00 a.m.
Fourth of July Holiday Observance Monday, July 5 All Day
City Council Meeting Tuesday, July 6 6:00 p.m.
Gateway Workshops Wednesday, July 7 All Day
Thursday, July 8 All Day
Board of Adjustment Monday, July 12 7:00 p.m.
Utility Advisory Committee Monday, July 13 3:00 p.m.
Planning Commission Wednesday, July 14 7:00 p.m.
City Council Meeting Tuesday, July 20 6:00 p.m.
"Arts In Action" Downtown July 24-25 All Day
Planning Commission Wednesday, July 28 7:00 p.m.
251
City Manager's Report
June 15, 1999
Page 2
CITY MEETING SCHEDUI~ ]DATE [TIME
City Council Meeting Tuesday, August 3 6:00 p.m.
Gateway Workshops Tuesday, Aug. 17 All Day
Wednesday, Aug. 18 All Day
POSITION JUSTIFICATION FOR COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER
Attached is a report from the Police Department on the need to fill the recently vacated Communications Officer
position in the Police Department. This position is a pan of our Pencom service and staff recommends the filling
of the position.
POSITION JUSTIFICATION FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Attached is a report from the Public Works Department on the need to fill the vacancy of a Wastewater
Treatment Operator at the Wastewater Treatment Plant created by the retirement of Mr. Gary Holbrook who
has over 26 years with the City of Port Angeles. This position is pan of our requirement to operate an efficient
wastewater treatment plant and staff recommends that the position be filled.
REPORT ON STATUS AND COST OF STORM DAMAGE SLIDE REPAIRS
The attached worksheei contains the breakdown of estimated costs and final costs for repair work for the winter
slide repair projects. The status of the separate projects actively being completed is as follows:
Tumwater & 5th - Mayor Braun and I had conversation with John Jolibois on June 2nd from Congressman
Dicks' office and gave him additional background about our need for emergency funding from feds for this slide
repair. We also discussed the Gateway project and activities going on downtown such as An on the Town and
murals. He indicated that he would report to Congressman Dicks our concerns about emergency funding needs.
The Geotechnical Engineer will have the plans completed soon so that bids can be called for. We have been
informed that the State of Washington did not meeting the federal requirement for emergency funding
for this storm.
Repair of Ennis Road
Repair being designed while waiting for FEIMA funds. Easements obtained from Rayonier and permanent fight-
of-way purchase being put together.
Elwha Emergency Valve
Valve vault and site work completed June 7. Valve assembly and appurtenances to be installed in
September/October after water demand slows down.
Peabody Creek Slide
Olympic National Park still reviewing access easement paperwork. Anticipate work to start before end of June.
North Access to Railroad Grade
Access road to be improved in late June or July once permanent easements with landowners signed.
252
City Manager's Report
June 15, 1999
Page 3
Elwha Slide Site
Hillside to be planted in June. Permanent easement for culvert inlet being surveyed and legal description being
put together. May require negotiation with property owner to obtain permanent easement.
SALES TAX REPORT - END OF MAY 1999
Attached is the Sales Tax Report of the end of May 1999 from Finance. We are collecting 60% less than the
same time last year, but are exactly on budget with 41% of our budgeted revenue collected.
LODGING TAX COMMITTEE
Received a request from Bob Harbick (attached) for funds to promote "Jettin the Strait". Staff has contacted
Chamber and VCB who have agreed to contact Harbick to consider funding from their existing funds. This
discussion should occur the week of June 14th. Part of staWs approach with the Chamber, VCB and Harbick
has been to inform them that the City's Lodging Tax Advisory Committee needs to be reestablished before the
City Council could consider issues (Jet Ski, Doubletree .... ) funded by the tax. The City Clerk has pointed out
that the terms of the former committee has expired. A minimum of 3 tax collectors (lodgers) and 3 tax users
(Chamber, VCB, winter sports) are needed. The last committee also had representatives from 2 "at-large", and
1 Downtown Forward. The reestablish the Lodging Tax Committee we request that the City Council
instruct staff to advertize, and encourage past members and others to apply.
PRE-DESIGN REPORT FOR PORT PROPERTY BY AIRPORT
City staffhas been working with the EDC and Port staffs to develop a proposal to be sent to EDA for a $40,000
grant to produce a pre-design report for utilities needed to service the Port property south of the airport. This
report would build on the previous Feasibility Report developed by Richard Can'others in which the City was
a partner and the discussions that occurred at the joint City/Port meeting earlier this year. The funding for this
$75,000 effort would be roughly $25,000 County Opportunity Fund (not guaranteed), Port and City at $5,000
and EDA at $40,000. The work would start using FY2000 funds in November of 1999 with the products
available for the 2001 budget process in mid-2000.
FUTURE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
Below is a listing of future issues scheduled for City Council review/discussion/approval. The schedule is
pre'~ but will provide the City Council with a rough idea of what is approaching on your meeting agendas.
· Glenn Goldberg presentation on GUTS July 6
· Wayne Roedell presentation: Mural package purchase by Council July 6
· Workshop for update on Council Goals [Mike Quinn present] July 6
· 6 Year Transportation Improvement Program Hearing July 20
· Presentation of vision for Rayonier Site UAC on July 12??
Attachment: Position Justification for Wastewater Treatment Plant
Position Justification for Communications Officer
Slide repair status and cost report
· Sales Tax Report - End of May 1999
Letter from Harbick
G:W_,XCHANGE\CNCLPKTq2TYMGR\CMREPTLOgXJUNE 15.WPD
253
pORTANGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: JUNE 9, 1999
To: MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jack Pittis, Director of Public Works and Utilities.
SUBJECT: Personnel Replacement - Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) Operator III
The WWTP Operator III has given notice that he intends to retire on or about July 30, 1999. WWTP
personnel consist of:
One Treatment Plant Supervisor, One Treatment Plant Operator III,
One Lab Specialist, One Treatment Plant Operator II,
One Water Quality Control Specialist One Treatment Plant Operator I,
These positions are the minimum necessary for the efficient operation of the WWTP. Treatment Plant
personnel not only operate the plant they also operate the Leachate System at the City Landfill and
work with local business to assist in the enforcement of the Pre-treatment Ordinance.
The Department of Ecology requires that the Plant operate with a Operator III on site at all times.
The Plant Supervisor is also an Operator III and when he is not available the position of responsible
charge is filled by this position.
With the retirement of the Operator III the Division will be one person short to efficiently maintain
the WWTP, Leachate System and the Pre-treatment Ordinance. The position is fully budgeted for
1999 and staff' recommends that the position be re-filled.
N:\TEMPUACK\WWTPREPL. POS
254
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
DATE: June 7, 1999
TO: MAYOR BRAUN AND CrrY COUNCIL
FROM: Steve Ilk, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Position Justification - Communications Officer
Summary_: A communications officer position was recently vacated with the resignation of
probationary employee, Thomas Machamer. Filling this vacancy is critical to the operation of the
24 hour 9-1-1 center. The cost of this position is $2,098-$2,676 per month plus benefits (range 1)
which is currently budgeted.
Recommendation: Authorize the establishment of a current eligibility list for the position and
the hiring of a qualified individual.
Background/Analysis:
A communications officer vacancy was created with the recent resignation of probationary employee,
Thomas Machamer. There is'no current eligibility list to hire someone for this position. The total
number of authorized line personnel is 15.5. This provides a complement of 3 people working during an
8 hour shift, around the clock, seven days per week. We temporarily have one employee working 3/4
time on a computer project that is vital to the completion of the Computer Aided Dispatch project. We
have worked around both vacancies, while Mr. Machamer was in training, by requiring our half time
employee to work full time for the past year. The entire staffhas worked twice the number of hours of
overtime than normal for several months in a row. The shift supervisors are each working at a radio
console as their primary duty. Supervisory responsibilities have been secondary.
The hiring process takes approximately 3 months to establish a register, conduct background
investigations and schedule psychological and voice stress analysis tests. It takes a minimum of four
months to train a new communications officer. We are hiring a temporary former employee until early
September which will help us through the peak months. We also expect to have the employee assigned
to the CAD project back to full duty in August. The advertising of the position was started, pending final
Council approval. We anticipate that we will have an individual officer hired to fill this vacancy and
fully trained by mid January 2000.
Due to the length of time it takes to hire and train an individual, the police department respectfully
requests and recommends that the Council authorize the establishment of an eligibility list and the hiring
of a replacement communications officer.
255
'7
The SeaSuns
, Bed and Breakfast Inn
1006 S. Un~ Street '~
Port Angeles, WA 98362
( 360 ) 452-8248
Where the Olympics
Your Host: Bob & Jan Harbick Greet the Sea
June 4, 1999
Mr. Jack PeRis
City of Port Angeles
Re: Jettin the Strait
Dear Jack:
On behalf of the Chamber of Commerce Tourism Committee, I would like to request a
position on the agenda for the next regularly schedule City Council meeting for a
presentation by our committee of our upcoming "Jettin the Strait" jet ski race scheduled
for September 19, 1999.
The presentation should not take more than 15-20 minutes with the intent of requesting
funds from the Tourism Tax Fund to help offset advertising and promotion expenses.
This is an exciting addition to tourist activities in Port Angeles with emphasis on the
harbor and waterfront amenities of our city.
I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience, so that we can work out
the final details of our presentation. Please call me at 452-8248.
Thanks for all your help with projects in the past.
Sincerely,
Bob Harbick
Tourism Committee
258
pORTANG L S
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
Date: June 15, 1999
To: Mayor Braun and City Council Members
From: Bob Coons, Human Resource Manager '~ ~
Re: Y2K Insurance Correspondence from WCIA
The Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) published their May/June newsletter with the
front page article on exclusion of insurance coverage for Y2K. I have attended two WCIA
membership meetings this past year where the executive board was discussing the issue of liability
insurance for the Y2K issue. This memorandum is a briefing summary relative to the article.
The WCIA membership is in excess of 100 public agencies, mostly small to medium sized cities.
The membership also includes emergency dispatch agencies such as Pencom. The legal staff of
WCIA has been recommending very strongly that no liability coverage be extended to the
membership for Y2K claims or lawsuits. This has concemed the executive board greatly as the trust
has not abandoned the membership needs in the past. However, as legal advisors indicated, the
insurance industry as a whole is not covering Y2K and the WCIA should not venture into coverage
that could potentially catastrophically impact the financial status of the pool's resources. It is
difficult to insure something when the extent of the liability is completely unknown. The
membership asked if the board has considered a minimal level of coverage such as $15-20,000 for
each agency. It was noted that such a small amount would not be sufficient for any real protection
as predefense costs would likely exceed this coverage. In discussion with the membership, it became
evident that a number of the smaller cities have not done much to prepare for Y2K. Most cities
indicated that they do not want the trust resources available for members that have not prepared
while many of the cities have expended considerable financial resources to get ready for the problem.
While clearly the vast majority (38-2 consensus vote of attending delegates) of members do not think
the trust should cover Y2K for liability claims, they did request that WCIA provide some level of
services with legal advise and educational information to make us all better informed. The executive
board will consider this request and formulate a plan for what services will be available and how
much financial resources will be allocated. The WCIA will have more information coming after the
October full board meeting.
As far as liability for Port Angeles, please recall the briefing from Fire Chief Becker at the June 1st
City Council meeting concerning the Y2K preparedness plan. The City is trying to reduce possible
liabilities and maintain public services that may be impacted by computer issues associated with
the Y2K problem.
259
260
pORTAN tr s
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
June 16, 1999
Mr. Rod Caldwell Mr. R.C. Liegel
2009 Old Olympic Highway 72 Old Joe Road
Port Angeles, wa 98362 Port Angeles, wa 98363
Mr. Richard Simmons Ms. Cerena S. Jordan
142 Old Joe Road 20 Old Joe Road
Port Angeles, WA 98363 Port Angeles, WA 98363
. Mr. Ted Connely Ms. Donne Blankenship
102 Old Joe Road 1114 Highway 101 West
Port Angeles, wa 98363 Port Angeles, wa 98363
Mr. Dan Hopf Ms. Anita Moo
84 Old Joe Road 21 Gakin Road
Port Angeles, wa 98363 Port Angeles, wa 98363
CERTIFIED MAIL AND HAND DELIVERY
RE: Old Joe Road water line replacement completion, switch over, and old water line
shutclown.
Dear Mr. Caldwell and Water Service Customers:
The Old Joe Roatt water line repla.cement has boen completed and passed the required
tests for activation. On June 21 ,1999, or shortly after, the existing old water line will be
shutdown to install a backflow prevention valve, cep the old line, and connect up to
those participating owners water services to the replacement water line. No more than
existing eight connections will be allowed to connect to the new line without City C6uncil
approval.
As notified earlier, the old water line can no longer be used to supply water from
the City and may not be reactivated following the shutdown. Those remaining
owners (Hoph, Connely, and Simmons) who chose to not participate in the
waterline replacement are .being reported, by copy of this letter, to the State
321 EAST FIFTH STREET ® P. O. BOX 1150 ® PORT ANGELES, WA 98362-O217
PHONE: 360-417-4805 ® FAX: 360-417-4542 ® TTY: 360-417-4645
E-MAIL: PUBWORKS~CI.PORT-ANGELES.WA. US 261
Department of Health Compliance Section for formal enforcement action in
accordance with the attached letter of April 9, 1999 which was sent to all owners.
To separate the old and replacement system during the shutdown, a cap will be
placed on the old system beyond the last non-participating owner connection.
Enforcement actions could include immediate disconnection of the old line from
City water system. This would require those owners remaining on the old line to
seek an alternate water supply. Existing City water meters on the old line would
be removed at that time.
Very truly yours,
nworthy, P.E.
City Engineer
GWlCgk
Copy: J. Pittis, R. EIIsworth, T. Funston
R. Hoey, WS Department of Health
Clallarn Co. Health, Building & Road Departments
Disk:N:~PWKS\ENGIN EER\WTRCRSP\OLDJOE4.WPD
File: Water Corresp.
262
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
SOUTHWEST DRINKING WATER OPERATIONS
247! Pacific Ave. · P.O. Box 47823 · Olympia, Washington 98504-7823
(360) 664-0768 · FAX (360) 664-8058
TDD Relay Service: 1-800-833-6388
April 9, 1999
Rod Caldwell
2009 Old Olympic Hwy
Port Angeles, Washington 98363
Subject: Old Joe Road Water System, ID//PENDING, Clallam County
Dear Mr. Caldwell:
According to our records, you are the owner of property served by the subject
water system along Old Joe Road in unincorporated Clallam County. This water
system is a waterline serving Old Joe Road that was installed through a franchise
with Clallam County dated July 5, 1962. Water service to the line is provided by
the City of Port Angeles, but operation and maintenance of the waterline is, as
stipulated in the franchise, the responsibility of the property owners. As a'result,
the Old Joe Road water system is a "purchasing" water system and, therefore,
subject to State Board of Health drinking water regulations (WAC 246-290).
Recently, this office has become aware of water quality problems within the Old
Joe Road distribution system. Numerous unsatisfactory coliform bacteria tests
have been collected by the City of Port Angeles from the water line along Old Joe
Road. The City issued a boil water advisory to the residents of Old Joe Road and
installed a cross-connection control device to prevent backflow into the City of Port
Angeles Water System. There have also been reports of illness by residents on the
water system.
Given the above, the Department of Health hereby requires that the owners of the
Old Joe Road Water System (including yourself) hire a professional engineer to
address the water quality concerns and upgrade the water system facilities as
necessary. You are directed to provide evidence to this office no later than April
30, 1999, that a registered professional engineer has been retained by the owners
of the Old Joe Road Water System to address the system deficiencies. This
requirement may be waived if the water system owners are shown to be working in
good faith with the City of Port Angeles to correct the system deficiencies.
Rod Caldwell
Page 2
April 9, 1999
Failure to comply with the above will result in the forwarding of the subject water
system file to our Compliance Section for formal enforcement action.
If you have any questions, please feel 'free to contact me in Olympia at
(360) 586-2510.
Richard T. Hoey, P.E.
WSDOH Regional Engineer
cc: Tania Busch-Weak, Clallam County Environmental Health
Ken Ridout, City of Port Angeles Public Works
264
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
P.O. Box 47775 · Olympia, Washington 98504.7775 * (360) 407.6300
,.Tune 2,, 1999
Mr. Kevin Curtis
City of Port Angeles
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362-1150
Dear Mr. Curtis:
Re: Port Angeles Wastewater Treatment Plant, NPDES Permit No. WA0023973 - Permit
Compliance Inspection
On May 19, 1999, the Department of Ecology conducted an inspection to evaluate compliance with
NPDES Waste Discharge Permit No. WA0023973. A copy of our inspection report is enclosed for your
records.
You have impressed us with your commitment to your work and the way you opexate and maintain the
wastewater treatment plant. The City has complied with the requirements of the NPDES permit with the
exception, seemingly, of Condition S12.B.5. The enclosed report discusses this and we suggest that you
send us a combined sewer overflow status report by July 31, 1999.
We plan to begin drafting a new NPDES permit soon. We will keep you informed of the status and we
will evaluate reduced 5-day biochemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids testing based on plant
pc~ormance.
Thank you for your time and cooperation during thc inspection. If you want to discuss our report or thc
NPDES permit, please call me at (360) 407-6278.
Sincerely,
Charles P. Hoffman / '
Water Quality Program
Southwest Regional Office
CH:le(9/wq)
Enclosure
cc: Jack Pitfis, City of Port Angeles
Dave Ragsdale, EPA/WOO
Kathie Emmctt, Ecology
W~shin~ion D.C. 20460 Form Approved.
- OMB No. 2040-0057
EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 10-31-
95
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e, PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/dy Inspection Type Inspector Facility Type
Remarks
2111 I I I I I I I.I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I.I I I I.I ]
Inspection Work Days Facility Self. Monitoring EvalUation Rating B1 QA Reserved.
671 t 14169 7015l 7lIDI 7211,TI 7311I 74 75l I I I I I I 180
Section B: Facillt~ Data
Hame and Location of Facility Inspected Entry Time. JDate Permit Effective Date
Port Angeles Wastewater Treatment Plant 9:50 A.M. November 30, 1993
1509 East Columbia May 19, 1999
Port Angeles, Washington Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
4:00 P.M. June 30, 1997
May 19. 1999
Name of On-Site Representative/Title/Phone Number Other Facility Data
Kcvin Curia, 9vrWTP Supervisor, (360) 417-4845
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone Number
Kcvin Curtis, WW'I'P Supervisor, (360)417-4845
City of Port Angeles
321 East Fifth Street, PO Box 1150
PortAn~eles, WA 98362-1150 Contacted ~ Yes [-I1%
Section C: Areas Evaluated Durin8 Inspection
(S=Satisfacto~ M=Mar~inal, U=Unsatisfaeto~, lq=Not Evaluated, lqA=lqot Applicable)
Pemt Flow Meas e ent Ma tenan CSO SSO
(Sewer
Overt'iow)
Records/Reports ~ Self-Monitoring Program ~ Sludge Handling/Disposal ~ Pollution Prevention
Facility Site Review [_~ Compliance Schedules ~ Prctreatment ~ Multimedia
Emuent/Receivin~ Waters I N I Laboratory I lq I Stormwater I I Other.
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments
Dick $chroeder did the previous Ecology inspection at the Port Angeles wastewmer treatment plant (WWTP) on February 16, 199~.
That report, and a previous inspection, dated February 8, 1994, describe the treatment process.
wastewater Treatment Plant
This WWTP is excellently operated and maintained. Ecology commends Kcvin Curtis and the employees at the WWTP for flawless
performance. The effluent is treated to well-below permit limitations. During the past 2.5 years of reporting thc discharge did not
exceed pet:mit limitations with the exception of a reported excecdence of the weekly mass total suspended solids (TSS) limit during
December 1997. However, the flow meter may not have been providing accurate measurement and the City is providing a calibrated
chart to expunge thc record.
The WWTP does not have an emergency power generator. Thc plant does have two separate power feeds. The Criteria for Sewage
Works Design (CSWD), in Section G2-8.3 requires two separate and independent sources of electrical power provided from two
separate utility substations. If all thc power is from a single substation then the CSWD requires an emergency power generator
located at the plant.
Sludge is treated by anaerobic digesters and dewatered by belt filter press. After dewatcring the sludge is hauled to the City's
composting process located at the City landfill.
Even though the plant is expertly operated and maintained, Ecology has a concern with thc number of employees at the WWTP.
The number of employees working at the WWTP is 4 less than the Operations and Maintenance Manual recommends.
NPDES Permit
Thc operators comply with thc NPDES permit's monitoring requirements. The sampling locations are representative of the intluent
and effluent. Thc permit, however, has been expired since June 30, 1997. The City submitted a new application in 1997 but
For NPDES permit compliance monitoring purposes, the City can request reduced monitoring of 5-day carbonaceous biochemical
oxygen demand (CBODs) and TSS. Ecology's permit writer's manual allows reduced testing frequencies from the manual's
recommended frequencies. The instructions in thc manual state thc reduction is determined by calculating the ratio of thc last 2
years of effluent data to thc monthly average limitation. For example, over thc past 2 years thc concentration of CBODs in thc
effluent has averaged 3.8 milligrams per liter (mg/l). This value divided by thc permit limitation of 25 mg/l equals 0.15 or 15
percent. According to the permii writer's manual the CBOD~ testing can be reduced from the recommended frequency of 3 times
per week to once per week. Following the same method for TSS yields the same result. Ecology could allow a reduction in TSS
testing to 1 time per week.
The permit requires testing and has limitations for silver. For at least the past 2 years, at a test frequency of 1 lime per month, the
silver concentration in the effluent has been below the method detection limit. The new NPDES permit will not have a silver
limitation or test requirement. It makes no sense to continue silver testing. However, to do that legally requires Ecology to modify
the permit. This action would be considered a major modification and would require a BO-day public notice period. Ecology plans to
write a new perm/t with/n the next few months and will eliminate the silver testing in the new permit.
The only condition in the N-PDES permit that the City has not been complying with involves Condition S12.B.$. Tiffs permit
condition requires the City to provide Ecology with a yearly combined sewer overflow (CSO) report that meets the requirements
listed in WAC 173-245-090(1). This report is to provide information regarding the year's frequency and volume of CSO discharges,
describe corrective action to reduce CSOs, and describer projects planned for the next year. The City has been sending monthly
discharge data from each overflow but Ecology never informed that City that this did not comply with the permit requirement.
In conclusion, Ecology commends Kevin Curtis and the employees at the WWTP for their expertise, commitment to their work, and
exemplary performance in operating and maintaining the WWTP.
Kathie Emmett and Darrel Anderson from Ecology also participated in the inspection.
Name and Signature of E~ngineer _//, , Agency/Office/Phone Number Date.
Charles Hoffman//~.~ ~ Ecology/SWRO (360) 407-6278
Signature ofManage~nent.... ~ ",.' / / Agency/Office/Phone Number '
, ~'). ~ ~~ Ecolo~/'/SWRO (360)407-6272
267
268
° 269
270~'
° 271
272 ~
° 273
274i
· ·
Destinations
Newsletter of the North Olympic Peninsula Visitor & Convention Bureau
Annual Travel Impact Study C.,.n~arof~¥.nts
March
Geoduck Salmon 6- 7
The Washington State Tourism estimated $179 million generated Derby, PT
Division recently released its Annual in local tax revenue and $501
Travel Impact Study. The study million in state tax revenue. Gallery Walk, PT 6
prepared by Dean Runyan Associates, * Transient lodging taxes collected .in
is to document the economic Washington in 1997 totaled $22.3 Annual Natural 19
significance of the travel/ndustry in million, an increase of 7.2% from Htstory& Science
Washington State from 1991-1997 and the previous year. It is estimated Lecture Series, Sequirn
to provide preliminary estimates for that these tax collections will rise
1998. These f'mdings show the level of an additional 7.6% to a level of Kite Makers 19.20
travel spending by those traveling to $24.0 mffiion during 1998. Conference, PT
and through the state and the impact 'Special' hotel]motel taxes will
this spending has on the economy in increase at an even greater rate, Protection Island 20
terms of the payroll, employment and from $7.5 million in 1997 to $12.0 Cruise, PT
tax revenue. This report also provides million in 1998, a 60% increase.
a measurement of Washington's visitor * Eleven counties have experienced Port Town.send 24-28
volume during 1998. average annual changes in travel Victorian Feztival
spending of more than 7.0% from
Quimper Arts Show & 27-28
· Travel spending in Washington 1991 to 1997. Seven of these Sale, PT
totaled approximately $9.6 billion counties are rural.
in 1998, generating $2.0 billion in · Clallam County travel Clallam Bay/Sekiu 27-28
payroll or directly supporting expenditures in 1997 totaled Salmon Derby
124,680 jobs. $146,170 showing an annual
· Since 1991, travel spending has change of 4%. April
grown 4.7% annually. This growth
Marine Science Center 3
is almost twice as fast as inflation, For a full copy of this report, which Spring Opening, PT
which amounted to 2.6% per year. includes 1991-1998p State Estimates
When adjusted for inflation, the (revised) and 1991-197 Detailed County Protection lzland 3, 10,
real growth rate in travel spending Estimates (revised) please contact Cruise, PT 24
averaged 2.0% per year. Kristi Agren at 452-8552.
· Travel spending also contributed
greatly to local and state Maritime Swap Meet, 3
governments during 1998 with an PT
Gallery Walk, PT 3
Annual Natural 16
Double Duty for Bureau In Vancouver B.C. . tory Scie.¢e
Lecture Seriez, Scquim
Ralnfest '99, Forks 16-18
Executive Director Rick market... Canada. With compliment the Seattle-
Herr joined the an attendance of 10,000 Metro Bus campaign that Port To Sail Races, PT 17.1~
Washington State and over 100 exhibitors breaks in mid-March. North Olympic 24
Tourism Office at the this show targeted outdoor The campaign is a joint Mustang Car Club
Adventurosity adventure travelers, marketing effort between Show, PA
International Travel Show While in Vancouver, Herr the Port Angeles
in Vancouver British along with Port Angeles Chamber of Commerce JFFA presents Ballet 24
Columbia February 12-14, Chamber staffcut a series and the North Olympic Folklorico 'Quetzalli'
1999. The venture was a of radio advertisements Peninsula Visitor & de Veracurz, PA
joint marketing effort to that will air this spring in Convention Bureau and 23rd Annual Bon,~ai 30
promote tourism in Seattle as part of a Port coordinated by Wendt Show, Sequim
Washington and on the Angeles advertising Advertising.
Olympic Peninsula from campaign. The radio
· our clo~e international advertisements will
275
Page 2 Destinalions
Staff Report
· Completed production of 1999 Sportsmen's Expo. · Distributed 250 visitor guides to
Official North Olympic Peninsula * Attended the International Blackball Transport Victoria
Visitor Guide. Outdoor Adventure Show in Office.
· Distributed 1999 Visiter Guide to Vancouver B.C. · Distributed 2000 visitor guides to
visiter information centers and · Rick presented seminar on Tourism Victoria Visitor Center
chambers throughout the Building Customer Service in · Worked on a reunion for ten-
Northwest and British Columbia. cooperation with the North classes for August 1999.
Reorder cards for additional Olympic Peninsula Job Service · Worked with Church of the
brochures are arriving daily. Employers' Committee and the Nazarene on retreat in June 1999.
· Attended the 1999 Travel Show in Port Angeles Chamber of · Worked with State Tourism office
Seattle promoting the North Commerce. to line up prize give-a-way package
Olympic Peninsula. · Attended Location Expo, Los for HR3 Reis·quiz a German
· Hosted a 'Packaging Seminar' co- Angeles, California. Travel quiz show that aired on
sponsored by the Washington · Worked with the Northwest February 8th to 230,000 German's
State Tourism. Orchid Alliance on conference in (see article, German Travel Quiz
· Distributed Olympic Peninsula July 2000. Show).
News to Puget Sound concierge · Barbara McCormick family · Worked with Voice of America-
and media, reunion. English Program in Washington D.
· Worked with Sunset and Vacation · Attended the Greater Seattle C. on summer story ideas and
magazines on upcoming Olympic Bicycle Expo promoting the Big activities on the Olympic
Peninsula articles. Hurt and cycling on the Olympic Peninsula.
· Rick presented seminar 'Training Peninsula. · Worked with Craig High School
Employees in Customer Service' to . Forwarded 100 visitor guides to Students from Wisconsin planning
the Washington State Employment AAA Washington from a request trip in Ju~.
Security Office. generated from the Seattle Travel
· Attended the Seattle International Show.
State Tourism Responds to Lodging Guide Shortfall
The Washington State Tourism Office The Washington State Hotel & Motel Robin Pollard. 'This is one of several
wffi not be receiving the full yearly Association (WSH&MA) that pieces our office provides to visitors,
allocation of 300,000 Washington State contracted with TSI to publish the and we are discussing options with the
Lodging and Travel Guides due to the guides, has retained legal counsel and Washington State Hotel & Mote[
recent declaration of bankruptcy by is making every effort to find the Association and our industry partmers
Technigraphic Systems, Inc. (TSI), means to print an additional 200,000 on how to fill the gaps.'
publisher of the lodging guide, copies.
However, the Tourism Office did The Tourism Office anticipates that the
receive 100,000 newly printed copies of 'Naturally we are greatly disappointed 100,000-lodging guides will last
the 1999 guide. These guides will be by this unexpected disruption to our through May, enough time to find
mailed to individuals who contact the fulfillment program, but we are supplemental solutions, according to
Tourism Office for information about confident that no visitor will be left Pollard.
where to stay in Washington State. empty-handed,' said Tourism Director
German Travel Quiz Follow-up' German Journalist Karl
Show Teuschl
The popular German travel quiz show An eight-minute film on the Olympic Peninsula aired February 28, 1999 in
HR3 Reis·quiz, which aired on Febru- Germany. Karl Teuschl completed narration of the film on his November 1998
ary 8, 1999, featured a package donated visit while working on a 30-page special section 'Cascadia-Northwest' in the
by the Doubletree Hotel Port Angeles. German travel guide Geo-Special. The special section will feature address·a,
The lead, generated by Rick Heft at an descriptions of hotels, restaurants, outfitters and attractions. The footage for
appointment while attending Pow Wow the film was shot in early November by Aiken Wi·ss.
1997 in Nashville, TN.
While in Port Angeles, Karl stayed at B.J.'s Garden Gate and ate at several
restaurants, including Toga's, First Street Haven and the Bushwhacker.
276
Page 3
Doubletree Hotel-Port Angeles Announces Construction of Port
Angeles CrabHouse Restaurant
Promus Hotel Corporation announced which includes a renovation of the general manager, Chef Pat Matthews
that its Doubletree Hotel-Port Angeles dining room and caf6 area utilizing a and Promus Hotels Corporation's F&B
will begin construction in March of a nautical theme, is expected to be division are in the process of creating a
new concept restaurant called the Port completed in April 1999. signature menu.
Angeles CrabHouse Restaurant. The
185-seat facility will serve a variety of 'We fully expect the Port Angeles Doubletree Hotels are a part of Promus
original and unique seafood dishes in a CrabHouse Restaurant to become one Hotels Corporation, one of the world's
casual setting with an emphasis on of the community's top restaurants,' premier lodging companies, with
Pacific Northwest seafood, said Woody. 'We are treating the system-wide annual revenues of
restaurant as a stand-alone facility approximately $5 billion. The company
To commemorate the start of the that just happens to be in a hotel. We owns, operates or franchises more than
$125,000 renovation, Troy Woody, will market heavily to the local 1,300 hotels, more than 150 of which
Doubletree general manager, unveiled community as well as to our hotel are Doubletree properties, with more
the restaurant's new marquee on guests.' than 190,000 rooms throughout the
Friday, February 19. The new 15-foot United States, Canada, Mexico and
sign is located just outside the Located along the Port Angeles L~tin America.
restaurant at 221 North IAncoln Street waterfront, the restaurant will serve
on the west side of the hotel. The breakfast, lunch and dinner seven days
complete makeover of the restaurant, a week. Scott F~ehan, restaurant
Location Expo '99
Rick Heft has just returned from outdoors. The VCB will fo]lowing
attending Location Expo in Los ~The film industry continues to up on all of the appropriate leads in
Angeles with the Washington state the next two weeks. Last year, we
film commission. 80 state leads look to our great outdoors as an were involved in over 1.6 million in
were generated and 10 projects excellent backlot for [eatures and local spending. We also
were identified as having a commercials" says Herr. experienced positive exposure
possibility of filming on the North when Disney and Lufthansa did
Olympic Peninsula. VCB staff has shows to highlight our area to
already sent photos out of the have interest is fishing villages for national and international
Cia]lam Bay Lighthouse for a a feature and as always, a host of markets.
prospective feature film. We also car eommercials that like our great
Legislative Day Correction
March 9~h is Washington Association of Visitor & The January issue of Destinations left out a important
Convention Bureau Legislative Day at our State piece of information. In an article on page three I
Capital. The NOPVCB plans to hold a luncheon in the failed to give recognition to a long time, outstanding
Governors Conference room with our Legislators to talk board member. Pat McCauley, InsideOut Marketing &
tourism. There will also be a tour of the Capital for Design Company has been on the NOPVCB Board
those of you who are new to the Washington State representing the Sequim Chamber of Commerce since
government. If you are intere~,d in participating 1995. Pat has an extensive h/story with the NOPVCB,
please contact Lisa Hopper at 360-452-8552. serving as President in past years.
277
North Olympic Peninsula BulkRate
Visitor & Convention Bureau U.S. Postage
North Olympic Peninsula Visitor & PAID
Convention Bureau Port Angeles, WA
P.O. Box 670
338 W First Street Room 104 Permit No. 17
Phone: 360-452-8552
Fax: 360-452-7383
Emafl: krisit~olypen .corn
Superhost Fund FYI
SuperHost Fundamentals is a five key SuperHost Fundamentals Internet Hits Year-to-Date
full day program focusing on commitments that assist you to 20,046
the needs of your visitors and 'go the extra mile'.
customers. The skills and 1999 Visitor Guide Distribution
techniques you will learn are Our attitude toward our visitors - Year-to-Date
fundamentals of service pro- whether they are from around the
fessionalism. By the end of world, across the state or across 14,344
these one-day workshops you the street - is a key element of set-
will be able to demonstrate an vice, which forms a lasting ira- 1999 Room Tax Collection
understanding of the impor- pressien. Courtesy, friendliness Year-to Date
tahoe of excellent customer and professionalism are essential (does not include additional ~°/~)
service skills; describe the ingredients of successful tourism
(~ommunication process, and industry operations. SuperHost Clallam $3,518.27 ~
the skills required to make encourages us to take pride in Forks $1,429.41 ·
your communication effective; ourselves, in what we do and in Port Angeles $6,821.20 ~
demonstrate how to listen to where we live.
your customers in a way that Sequim $1,758.26 ~
shows that you care about Call your local chamber to ol~tain Jefferson $7,851.15 ~
them and their needs; describe dates and to register for this Port Townsend $6,081.15 ~
the value of tourism to the award-winning program.
Olympic Peninsula and your ~ increase ever 1998
community and explain the ~ decrease over 1998
278
! Pemniula , ' 1
V~sitor &~ Convention Bureau
May/June 1999
Port Angeles Ad Campaign Stirs Interest!
April-May
30-9 Scquim Irrigatioll In the firat week of the radio Go.' The public is being asked to humorous way, to become
Festival portion of the Port Angeles help determine what the involved in Port Angele~'s fight
apring advertising campaign, perpetrator'a motive waa. Is this a against thi~ culprit - to think for
May people are listening! 'The person who knows how beautiful themselves by calling for their
3-7 National Tcmrism Week campaign has definitely been Port Angeles i~ and wanto to keep per~onal viaitor guide:~ Jan
attention-getting - - and that's it all to him/heraelf? Wigen, Wendt ~ommunicatiorm,
3 SuperHost, Forks hard to do in the media-filled Spokane, WA.
4 SuperHost, PA Seattle-Tacoma area. The five Er1 Hansen, Executive Director,
radio stations running our ada Port Angeles Chamber of The Port Angele~ Chamber of
5 SupcrHost, Scquim have a cumulative liatenerahip of Commerce report~, 'In addition to Commerce, the North Olympic
6 SuperHost, PA nearly a million people. ~ome calla of complaint, we've also Peninsula Viaitor& ~onvention
7 SuperHost, PT However, we are a~n~itive to had many people who, when they Bureau and Wendt
callers who feel the
8-16 63rd Rhododendron use of'bleeps' m the -..~. ~ __. ~.. ~~ ~
Festival, PT ads condones
swearing. We have
!ntcmation~l Trade from the continuing
Show r,~dio ads" says Rick
Herr, Executive
19 "The Big Top" Re..~l Dire¢mr, NOPVCB.
Bros. Circus, PA
After editing, the eom mes,~age call for their visitor guide, say Communication~ thank tho~e
27 NOPVCB Board remains the same for the they really l~ughed when they people who h~,ve called aborn the
Meeting, Carmichael~ continuing radio ads and the heard the ad. An& ~ome of th~ ads, both pesi~ive and negative,
Grill, Port Angeles newspaper adverti~in~ I~inning folks who e~l.~d to complain were and, by ~esponding to their
April 14 - April $0 in The 8eattle ~o in~mst~d in Por~ Angeles they concerns, look forwm'd to a
28-316th Annual Juan de Fuca Times/PI travel ~eetion~. The a~ked for vi~imr packets.' positive continuation of this
Festival, PA ads build on a tongue-in-cheek creative and attention-getting
spoof about trying to catch the 'We're encouraging people to not campaign, with the result of
Jane
person who used spray paint to let this 'person' keep them from increased visitorship to Port
5-6 Classic Mariner's change Port Angeles's busboard visiting Port Angeles and finding Angeles.
Regatta, PT ads from 'Port Angeles. The Way out for themselves how great it ia!
5-6 Cancer Walk PA to Go" to "Port Angeles. Don't We're motivating them, in a
12 Bull-a-Rams
NoPvce nord United States Olympic Committee Grants
TaA Approval of olympicpeninsula.org
19 Ediz Hook Fun Run,
PA United States Olympic Committee the United States Olympic Com- trained to maintain and make
26-27 1st Annual attorneys' have granted approval mittee is a violation of federal minor changes, additions and
International Elwha for the use of the word 'Olympic' law. deletions to the site. AH members
River Pow Wow, PA in the new domain name of the of the NOPVCB will receive a link
29-30 Turning Point North Olympic Peninsula Visitor The new domain olvmoicoenin- to their home page at no charge.
Weekcncl, Forks & Convention Bureau, sula.or~ is expected to be on-line
'olvmoicoeninsula.org'. Any use sometime in May. Seattle Pub- The NOPVCB is excited about
of the words 'Olympic" or liahing, the company that pro- this new site. With ownership
'Olympiad' or a composite desig- duces the North Olympic Penin- and content control, this will en-
nation which includes the word or sula Visitor Guide, has started able the Bureau to better serve
other words included in the Ama- work on converting the visitor visitors to the site as well as our
teur Sports Act (36 U.S.A. #164 guide files into a website. Once membership.
#380) without the permission of finished NOPVCB staffwill be
279
PAGE 2 DESTINATIONS
Staff Report Highlights Sta wide stina n
Network Meeting- ~u~ions ~cluded ~ ~q~ ~ket~g A~n
Me~a ~ants, wor~g ~th ~e med~, a ~mmit~ He~
· Group ~ g~de m~g ~ lead~ ~it ~om U.S. ~e~an ~a~ ~ Olymp~ ~at~n~ ~ast ~ne
~e~rated by Seattle-~ County ~ Offi~ ~p~ntative ~d an Sanct~ Ad~ ~mmitt~
at Hovem~r 1~8 Nation~ To~ ~ternat~nal repo~ (SAC) - ~ He~
~s~atMn ~n~n~n. App~ately · ~e Bit H~ was hated ~ the 1~ ~uly- ~ Nor~e~m ~~ He~
~. ~other 47 wffi ~ marled out to W~ De~m~r In~rnation~ Festiv~s · ~ ~CA ~cu~ ~mmitt~
operaWrs in A~, Swi~rhnd and Events ~cia~on Calen~ of E~n~. He~
Ge~any, leads t~t we~ ~ived ~m Calendar is d~tgbu~d ~ thou~nds of
~ WA State As~ia~on of ~nvention
the WasMn~n Sta~ To.sm ~. mem~rs and subsc~rs worldwide.
t V~iWr B~au's ~C~) - Ri~
· ~ No~h O~mpic Pe~a ~o~ ~th * ~ck ~wed up on e~ht 6lin ~d ~deo He~,
the ~O~CB ~ n~r w~ ~at~d ~als ~m t~ Was~n S~ ~ S~wide ~st~tion M~
in t~ Was~n~on S~te Sp~-Summer Film Offi~. Network- ~sti
Getaway Guide that was ~se~d inW
the M~Ap~ ~sues of Ho~hwest · Provided ~ormation on t~ Olympk ~ Po~ ~s To~m ~mmit~e,
Pe~ns~a W travel ~i~r ~ ~tkle ~ck He~
TraVel ma~i~. C~at~n ~,~.
for the San Die~ U~on ~b~e ~a~l
· No~h Olympk Pe~ns~a V~itor Guides ~ction. To~.a~ent Commit~e, ~a
m~led ~ Was~n Sta~ To.sm
E~o~ ~ in P~, Frame. * St~ed pr~u~ion press oft~ No~h Hopper
Olympk Pe~ns~a V~i~r O~de 2~
· ~s~nded W 855 ~i~r ~q~es by NOPVCB is a mem~r of~e
d~e~ m~ · D~t~buted We~ome si~ W downWwn lo,owing org~i~o~: Po~
Pon A~eles busi~s~s wel~n~ ~o~ ~eMs, ~q~m, Forks, Cl~am Bay/
· Hosed St~osus, 17 ~an ~ In~rnat~n~ ~nvention Se~u C~rs of ~mme~, To.sm
o~raWrs and Ma~l a~nts on a W~ of VicWr~, ~d WA Sta~ ~ation of
the Olympic Pe~a. Co~es ~d Bo~ds se~ed on by V~iWr ~ ~nventMn B~au's.
· ~s~ ~n a~nds Qu~r~ NO.CB S~
Group Tour Guide Arrives
~e No~h O~mpk Pe~!ns~ Visi~r & ~nera~d at indus~ ~de s~ws and by ~.
Conven~n B~au ~n~ m~ived ~170 t~ Was~n Sta~ To~m O~. In
copies of ~e new ~Was~n S~'s ad~t~n ~ the nume~ domestic ~
Ol~pic Pe~i~a Group To~ P~nning o~ra~, ~-~ven W~ o~ra~ ~m
G~de'. ~e ~ide was a ~e A~ Swi~r~d and
proje~ ~een ~ Ho~ O~p~ ~n~ ~ve the O~mp~ Pen~s~a
Pe~s~ V~iWr & ~nven~n B~au, ~uded on t~M i~s. ~e~
To~m G~s H~r ~ t~ ~ap B~ A~ation smt~t~ show that a
Persia V~i~r & Conven~n B~au. l~d ~-s~-p~nger moor ~ach on
~e eight ~d a ~ ekven-~ch ~ a c~r or ~ leaves an ave~ of U.S.
~Mr ~e wffi ~ m~d to ~up W~ ~,~0 ~ $7,0~ per day per ove~t
operaWrs and ~avel agents t~ughout s~y.
t~ U~d Sta~s ~d E~ ~m ~ T~r Gu~
Vacations Magazine- Olympic Peninsula Scenic Drive
The spring 1999 issue of Vacations Travel Industry Association of and Bisbee; Idaho and Montana;
Magazine ~eatured an article "Scenic America that estimates that about 80 Tennessee to North Carolir~; San
Drives - l~,~piore the country's percent of all m~mm~r vacation travel Juan Skyway, Co; Highway 7,
prettiest back roade' and coming in at each year is by car, truck and RV. Arkansas; B,,ff~lo Bill Scenic Byway,
number 10was the Olympic The article lists the NOPVCB toll- Wyoming;, Natchez Trace Parkway,
Peninsula. The article inspired by free 800 number to call for more Mississippi and Tennessee; Seward
report~ ~ the American information. The other nine scenic Highway, AlAska.
Automobile A~sociation and the drives that made the list were: Tucson
28O
DESTINATIONS PAGE 3
Travel Industry include: sightseeing Wur (24%), movie sentin~ '~E-Commetce and the Inter-
(16%), theme park (15%), religious net". This two hour 8~minA~' is a
Association News sempe (14%), 1/ve theatre or live public forum for everything you ever
Over one-half·f U.S. adult travelers performance (14%) and festival or wanted to know about doing bus/ness
(53%) planned act/v/ties ai~r they parade (13%). On, quarter of past on the Internet. Featured panelists
arrive~ at their destination whLle on a year travelers (24%) went to some are from Olympus Net, Olypen, Ten-
trip of 100 miles or more, one-way, in other type of attraction, which they forward, Andaleon and Associates, A-
the past year. This equates to ?4. a plarmed after arr/val at their I l~etlViarket/ng, Delabarre and Asa·-
million U.S. adults, according to the destinatiox~ To learn mare about ~ ciates and Ag/_f~om. com.
meat recent Travel Industry report see the TIA online pre·ar·om
Association of America (TIA) travel at www.tia, org. Learn from Webmasters, ISP prey/d-
poll of 1,200 U.S. adults. Dini~ o~t ers, .and Designers about:
in restattrants were popular with
more than 67 million travelers (48%) E-Commerce and the · Shopp/ng carts
in 1998 and wa~ the most popular Internet · Web hosting
activity planned after arrival at a · Monthly fees
deatinatior~ Going to a shopping area The Science, Technology, and · Search eng/nes
was the second most popular Manufacturing Association · Design soi~vare
spontaneously planned activity (45%), (ST]VIA) on May 13, 1999, 7:00- ....and morel
followed by visiting a museum (26%). 9:00 p.n~, at the Peninsula Co]-
Please RSVP to Chris 452-2275 or
Other activities planned after arrival lege Little Theater, will be pre-
seitechrnfg~olympu ~net.net
Olympic Raft & Guide Service
Changes Name After i 4Years
After fourteen years as Olympic ~ new building will feature two large der way with the Doubletree Hotel to
& Guide Service owner David I~in~ restroonl8 with four c~ stalls set up hourly sea kayak rentals on the
decided it was time for a change, each, a large covered p~ch area with waterfront. This service will hope-
"The new name Olympic Raft & picnic tables and a retail ama for river fully be in place by the 4ta of July
Kayak, better reflects who we are clotblng, gear, snacks and beverages, weekend.
and what we do", said King. Olympic
Raft & Kayak is currently in the proc- Olympic Raft & Kayak is now offering Olympic Raft & Kayak has also ex-
ess of building a new main office canoe and sea kayak rentals through- panded their retail kayak sales, now
across the Elwha River from their out the year. There is an assortment of along with their ever popular open
present location The new address is kayaks and canoes available for novices cockpit Ocean Kayak brand they will
123 Lake Aldwell Road and construe- and experienced paddlers and roof now be offering two other makes ~f
tion should be completed by May. The racks are available ~ Plans are un- closed cockpit sea kayaks.
Packaging Seminar Follow-up
After attevdlng the Packaging Seminar accommodations at SeaSuas, meals at Gateway Therapeutics, The ~Festival
sponsored by the Washington State the port Angeles Brewing Company and Getaway' also allows visitors to purch_s~
Tourism Off/ce, the Port Angeles their choice of fishing, rafting, kayAl~ing, add-ons such as rafting or kayaking trips,
Chamber of Commerce, NOPVCB, the hiking and]or mountain climbing. Hurricane Ridge tours, fly-fishing,
Juan de Fuca Festival of the Art~ and naturalist led hikes, rain forest
SeaSuns B&B have created some terrific Karen Hanan, Juan de Fuca Festival of adventures, scenic flights, etc.
package deals to offer visitors, the Arts, also teamed up with Harbick to
offer the convenient option of purchasing The Juan de Fuca Festival of the Arts has
Bob Harbick, SeaSuas B&B, brought a 'Festival Getaway'. The "Festival also teamed up with Port Angeles
together businesses such as, Olympic Getaway" offers three different packages Brewing Company, Bolla Italia, the
Raft & Kayak, Waters West, Olympic which include accommodations provided Uptown Inn and the Hill Haus Inn to offer
Mountaineering Outfitters and Guide by the Doubletree Hotel or SeaSuns Bed our Canadian neighbors a 'Canadian at
Service and Port Angeles Brewing & Breakfast, tickets to the festival, Par Weekend'.
Company to offer v~sitors a one stop dinners at 13ella Italia or Port Angeles
shopping. For one price visitors get Brewing Company and/or Steam Bath at Great job guys!
281
U
NORTH OLYNPIC PENINSULA VISITOR & I '
CONVENTION BUREAU }D/~'~!l'''~'
33a W Fl~ ~ R~ I~
Po~ ~, WA 93862
Phone: 360-4524~552
F~x: 360-452-7383
Errml: krisit~olype~.cOm
National Tourism Week---SuperHost Programs
Aa part of recognizing National customers in a way that shows that
Tourism Week May 3-7, 19~9, you care about them and their
Call your local chamber to
Chambers of Commerce across the needs; describe the value of tourism
reserve your spot today.
Olympic Peninsula will be hosting a to the Olympic Peninsula and your
one day hospitality seminar. The community and explain the five key ~Monday, May ~--Forks
seminar, a$uperI-Iost' taught by SuperHost Fundamentals,
360-874-2531
hospitality professionnl- of Tourism commitmento that assist you to go
British Columbia, is a full day the extra mile. Tuesday, May 4--Port A~geles
program focusing on the needs of
your visiWrs and customers. The Our attitude toward our v/sitors - 360-452-2363
sldll~ and techniques you will learn whether they are from around the
are fundamentals of serv/ce world, across the state or across the Wednesday, May 5---Sequim
professional/sm. By the end of street is a key element of service, 360-653-6197
these one-day workshops you will be which forms a lasting impression.
able to demonstrate an Courtesy, friendliness and Thursday, May 6--Port Angeles
understanding of the importance of professionnli~m are essential ~60-452~2363
excellent customer service skills; ingred/ents of successful tourism
describe the communication industry operations. SuperHost Friday, May 7--Port Townsend
process, and the skill.~ required to encourages us to take pride in 360-355-2722
make your communication effective; ourselves, in what we do and in
demonstrate how to 1/zten to your where we live. I
pORTANGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S,A.
CiTY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: June 15, 1999
To: Mayor Braun and City Council
FROM: Brad Collins, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Planning Department Activity Report - May, 1999
CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITY:
Shoreline Substantial Development Permits 2
Conditional Use Permits
Administrative Review Approvals 3
Environmentally Sensitive Areas Reviews 1
Code Enforcement 1
Variance 1
Wetland Permit 1
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 4
Annexation 1
SUBDIVISION ACTIVITY:
Subdivision
Short Plat 1
Boundary Line Adjustments
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) DETERMINATIONS:
Determinations of Non Significance
Mitigated Determinations of Non Significance
Determinations of Significance
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ACTIVITYj
Clearing and Grading Permits 1
Building Permits 15
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES:
Water Resources Inventory Area (WRIA) 18
Downtown Parking Plan
Annexation Planning
Cascadia Regional Plan
283
WATER DBdAND RAINFALL
?
n 1~ · 1~99 ri 199~ · 1999 ., ~0 Yelr Average
DATE (MG) 10 YR AVG. TOTAL TO DATE 11.74
(MG) THIS YR TO DATE (IN) t7.1i
RECORD HIGH THiS MONTH 3A5
RECORO LOW THiS MONTH 0.M
E'WER SYSTEM JETTED 4.110 32,222
ORM DRAINS JETTED 0 2,630
STEM TV INSPECTED 0 5.163
TOTAL LANDFILL DISPOSAL
ELECTRICAL USAGE
U,I
1.6M (? I~,) cnY O~ ~ECXM
(TONS) f~ lg~8 ~1~
[TONS)
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITY DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT
MAY 1999
::i::
* Classroom presentations at Neeh Bay Schools
· Mainbresks: one 4' ° Participated in Kids Day America
' Relocated 3 watarmeter services * Scrap iron baled and shipped from Landfill
· Fire Hydrants: maintenance * Metal storage area paved at landfill
· Black Diamond Reservoir: cleaned
' Tested meters for PUD
* Flagging for street paving
* Pump Stations O&M * Asphalt restoration atwatar cuts
* Repair 8" main ~ Hwy 101 & Rosewoods ' Bomford roadside vegetstion
' Assisted ~ street paving ' Remodel restrcom at Shana Park
* Skin patch Chert7 Hill
* 8th Street: grind wheel ruts
' C Street: prep fo~ paving
° Asphalt restoration on Marine Drive; Oak- Cherry
* Sweeping: citywide
* Worked with Rayonier on dumping wastwater at WWTP
· Worked with B&C on modeling of collection system
* Worked on pretreatment issues ~ local dis43harges
· Worked on Y2K issue for WVVTP SCADA system
* Worked on control system at Landfill treatment ponds
* Reviewed Water Division proposals for SCADA system
* Worked on plumbing for Algae Control in Secondary Clrifiers
* Constructed odor control system for Trickling Filters Ii~ii~i~i?ii~i~i~i!~ii:~i!~!~i!~i~i!i!~ii~i~i~i!~i?i~i~i~ii~ii~~i~!i~~::~iiiiii~i!~iiiii~i~iiIiii~
° Airport Road Realignment, r/w acquisition completed
· Sidewalk condition survey completed
* 8th Street Design, consultant selected
' Street Classification ordinance updated
' CSO/I&I Study support
' LID 215 Final Assessment notice of public hearing
* 1999 Paving Program bid award,ecl .
* Service Tickets processed: 68 ' Jones Reservoir ~over project bios opene~
· PM Services and inspections: 23 * FEMA repairs (4th Street and Pine Street) bid awarded
' Denvefs PM services: 3 ' Gateway Design consultant support
' Denver's Service Tickets processed: 22 ' 13th Street Sewer design bids opened
· ~ Fire Pumper, electrical and computer repairs * "1" Street Sidewalk design bids opened
* #1917 Cat Loader, landfill, engine repairs * Tumwatar Slide design
' Fire Truck: new truck delivered
· Snow Removal: Spraying Equipment delivered
"Blvd/PeabodylPark reconductor finished
· Remove 3-phaee transformer bank, etc: Watar/Caroline/Jooes
· Elks Field: install light, guards, raise ne~ng
· UG line extention: Hopkins/Truck Route
' Continue underground at Lee Plaza
· Relocate overhead at #. Boat Haven
· Retight Corp yard facilities
° Relamp downtown street lights
288
Port Angeles
Fire Department
Hearts and Homes
May 1999
Total Fire Dept. Calls Fire $ Loss/Saved
1200 1,600,000
1,400,000
1000~-- 1,200,00D
800 1,000,000
800,000
600 600,000
400
400
200,000
200 0 ~
1998 1999
1997 1998 1999 [] Saved · Loss
May 98/99 Total Calls 196/208 Saved Loss
1999 Total Calls YTD 1,134 1999 YTD 123,510 94,500
1998 Total Calls YTD 974 1998 YTD 1,409,735 1,081,835
50 ~
40 :
30 ?
2O ~
,o-
O
Fires > 5K Fires < 5K Auto Brush Haz Mat
1998 1999
Year to Fires > $5,000 Fires < $5,000 Auto Fires Brash Fires Haz Mat
Date Incidents ...
1999 3 19 9 8 61
1998 8 21 12 12 48 .'
Fire & Life Safety Insp Prevention Activities YTD
500 120 /
100
400 I
80
3OO
4O
2OO
100 -- 0
1998 1999
Inspections Reinspections
Permit
Inspections
I Plan Reviews
~ ,908 I 1999 Public Education Contacts
Inspections Reinspections Permit Plan Public Ed
Inspections Reivews Contacts
1999 YTD 461 368 1999 88 14 15
1998 YTD 430 341 1998 103 26 12
Medic I Transports Patients Assisted
'00 1000
400 800
300 600
200 400 ~--
100---- 200 ~--
0 0
ALS BLS Fim Dept. Olympic Ambulance
[] 1998 I 1990 [] 1998 ~ 1999
Advanced Life Support (ALS) &
Basic Life Support (BLS) Patient: Assisted
Fire Dept. 1998 1999 % Fire Dept. 1998 1999 %
ALS- YTD 365 409 10.7 ! YTD 770 917 16 !
BLS - YTD 33 31 6 !
SPECIAL DEUVERY
Fred McPherson alights/~'om a ne~c fire truck aider delA,ering it to the Po~
Angele.¢ Fire Dcpartmct~t /~om the Pierce Manufacturing Inc. in ~pleton,
The truck, ~'ith greater t,ersatitity and passenger capacity, replaces a 1974 unit
the deparlment still uses.
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
May 26, 1999
7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Fred Hewins,Dean Reed, Jason Robotkay,
Bob King
Members Absent: Mary Craver, Fred Norton, Linda Nutter
Staff Present: Brad Collins, Sue Roberds, Dan McKeen, Gary Kenworthy
Public Present: Andy Duran, Jame Turner, Margo Turner, Tim Rymer, Lyle
Kinney, Pam Tietz, Andy Meyer, Ron Floyd, Jane Floyd,
Craig Miller
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Reed moved to approve the May 12, 1999, meeting minutes as presented.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hewins and passed 3-0 with Commissioner
King abstaining due to absence at that meeting.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
REQUEST TO CIRCULATE AN ANNEXATION PETITION -
TURNER -ANX 99-02 - Approximately 4.5 acres located south of Highway
101 at Old Joe Road. Request for consideration of annexation. The
applicants will request commercial zoning for this proposal.
Planning Director Collins reviewed the Planning Department's staff report recommending
approval of the request to circulate an annexation petition with the provision that the
applicant's seek pre-annexation zoning prior to annexation action. He fiat_her explained that
the property was originally classified as commercial and so was included in the City's Urban
Growth Area (UGA). The classification was ultimately changed to urban low density
residential (LD) in the County's final Regional Plan. This LD land use designation allows
up to 9 units per acre which is similar to the City's Residential Medium Density (RMD)
zone. The applicants are seeking annexation to the City so the property can be developed as
commercial. Given the services in the area, Mr. Collins stated that the original commercial
designation may best serve the area. Vice Chair Hewins opened the public heating.
Margo Turner, 3904 South Reddick Road, responded to Commissioner Reed that she
understands the sequence of events needed to accomplish a commercial annexation. She
does not believe that residential development along Highway 101 at this location is desirable
and that commercial development would better serve the community.
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26, 1999
Page 2
Andy Meyer, County Planning Director, 223 East Fourth Street, stated that the County has
no concerns regarding the annexation as the property is within the City's UGA. However,
the County would oppose the Turners' request for a rezone to commercial and did so some
time ago, as commercial zoning at this location conflicts with the County's adopted Regional
Plan. It may be appropriate at this time to review the land use designations of properties on
the fringe of the UGA for appropriateness of zoning.
There being no further testimony, Vice Chair Hewins closed the public hearing.
Following brief discussion, Commissioner Reed moved to recommend that the City
Council approve the Turner's request to circulate an annexation petition with the
provision that pre-zoning be sought prior to that submittal, citing the following findings and
conclusions:
Findings:
1. On April 14, 1999, the Planning Department received an annexation request from
Mr. and Mrs. James Turner for a 4.53 acre area located south of US Highway 101 at
Euclid Street on Old Joe Road.
2. On May 18, 1999, the City Council sent the request to the Planning Commission for
review and a recommendation and set a date to discuss the request with the applicants
for the City Council's June 1, 1999, meeting, per RCW 35A. 14.120.
3. Two property owners constitute the area in question.
4. The applicants will request pre-annexation zoning as described in RCW 35A.340.
5. The area of proposed annexation is currently designated as residential by the County.
6. The proposed annexation area is within the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area.
7. The nearest City utilities are located across (north) of US Highway 101 at this
location. The subject property fronts on US Highway 101.
8. The factors considered under RCW 35A. 14.200 in review of annexation proposals
include "the configuration of the area, comprehensive use plans and zoning, the
likelihood of significant growth in the area and in adjacent incorporated and
unincorporated areas during the next ten years, location and coordination of
commtmity facilities and services., the probable effect of the annexation proposal or
alternatives on cost and adequacy of services and controls in the area, and the effect
of the annexation proposal or alternatives on adjacent areas."
9. The Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan as amended June, 1997, contains 10 policies
(Growth Management Element Policies B 1-10) directly related to annexations.
10. The proposed promotional annexation must comply with the City's annexation
policies as established in the City's Comprehensive Plan and Resolution 18-78.
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26, 1999
Page 3
1. As conditioned, the proi~osed annexation is consistent with the City's annexation
policies as established in the Comprehensive Plan Growth Management Element
(Policies B 1-10)
2. The City's policies encourage annexation within the Port Angeles Urban Growth
Area, which was established to accommodate growth which is expected to occur over
the next twenty years.
3. There is access to the site for urban services.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner King and passed 4-0.
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS:
(A.) Reclassification of area occupied by the Clallam County Housing
Authority - south of Lauridsen Boulevard at Francis Street -
from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential.
Planning Director Collins noted that Comprehensive Plan amendments may be initiated by
a number of sources. Of the four amendments currently under consideration, one is being
sought by an individual, one fi.om the Clallam County Housing Authority, and two from the
City of Port Angeles. He then reviewed the Planning Department's staff report
recommending approval of the proposed amendment. Vice Chair Hewins opened the public
hearing.
Para Tietz, Executive Director of the Clallam County Housing/luthority, 2603 South
Francis, concurred with staff's recommendation and answered general background
questions.
There being no further concerns, Vice Chair Hewins closed the public heating.
Commissioner King moved to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan
amendment as proposed citing the following findings and conclusions:
Findings:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(A),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port
Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. All information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(A),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the
public hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation have been
considered in this decision and is considered a part thereof.
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26, 1999
Page 4
2. This proposal to amendment the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map fi.om LDR to
MDR applies the Clallam County Housing Authority development in the 2600 block
of South Francis Street shown on a map (Attachment A).
3. The subject area has been designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned as
Single Family Residential RS-7.
4. The Mt. Angeles View site has an office and resident service center and multiple
family housing units that have existed and have been in operation without
interruption for approximately 50 years (prior to the City of Port Angeles adopting
zoning and a comprehensive plan for the subject area).
5. The existing land use in the subject area and surrounding areas are as follows;
subject area: multiple family residences and auxillary Housing Authority
facilites and services
north and west: single family residences
east: Peabody Creek Ravine and single family residences and
church
south: Olympic National Park headquarters
6. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)
on May 18, 1999. This action fulfills the City's responsibility under SEPA.
7. Public notice was provided by legal notice published in the Peninsula Daily News
and posted at the site.
8. The Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies idenitified as being the most relevant
to the proposal were Growth Management Element Goal A, Policis A 1, 2, and 17,
Objective A 1, Land Use Element Goal A, and Housing Element Goals A-B.
9. The population growth in Clallam County has exceeded the forecasts from the State
Office of Financial Management since the Growth Management Act was enacted.
If growth is directed to the County's urban growth areas, the City should plan to
maintain exiisting residential neighborhoods and to accommodation new residential
development in urban growth areas adjacent to the East, South Central, and
Southwest Planning Areas.
Conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(A),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed
findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby concludes the following:
A. The proposed land use redesignation recognizes the historic and current use and will
encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the
population., promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and
encourage preservation of existing housing stock.
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26. 1999
Page 5
B. The City has promulgated regulations to protect private property rights. The
proposed land use redesignation will acknowledge the historic and current use and
allow accessory uses that the public housing activity to occur on their site as
developed.
C. The proposal is consistent with the annual review of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
D. The land use redesignation support the existing and planned land use development
of the City.
E. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, specifically those listed in Finding 8.
F. The land use redesignation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and
in the public interest.
Commissioner Reed seconded the motion which passed 4 - 0.
(B) Revision to Figure 11 Circulation Plan Map in the
Comprehensive Plan (and Figure 3.2 in the Transportation
Services and Facilities Plan [TSFP]) which identifies street
classifications City wide.
Planning Director Collins reviewed staff's report recommending the Comprehensive Plan
amendment be approved as proposed. The proposed amendment will make the Plan map,
the TSFP map, and past ordinances consistent with one another.
City Engineer Gary Kenworthy, Public Works Department, responded to Commissioner
Reed that although a 1977 ordinance listed streets by classifications, that ordinance was
never codified. The proposed ordinance revises street classifications by current use
amending those that have been downgraded or increased in classification since 1977.
Chair Hewins opened the public hearing. There being no comment from the public, he
closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Reed moved to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Map
amendment citing the following findings and conclusions:
Findings:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(B),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port
Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. All information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(B),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the
public hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation have been
considered in this decision and is considered a part thereof. 2
Planning Commission Minutes
Ma)' 26, 1999
Page 6
2. This proposal applies city-wide, and the street reclassifications are shown on a map
(Attachment A) and listed in a draft ordinance (Attachment B). The proposed
amendments have already been approved in the Transportation Services and
Facilities Plan.
3. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)
on May 18, 1999. This action fulfills the City's responsibility under SEPA.
4. This is an areawide Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and public notice was
provided by legal notice published in the Peninsula Daily News.
5. The Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies idenitified as being the most relevant
to the proposal were Growth Management Element Goal A, Policis A 1, 2, 5, 6, 12,
13, 14,15 17, Objective A 1, Land Use Element Goal A, Transportation Element
Goals A-B, Capital Facilities Element Goal A and Policies A 3 and A 5.
Conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(B),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed
findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby concludes the following: "
A. The proposed street reclassifications recognize the existing and planned development
patterns and are supported by land use and transportatioln policies.
B. Urban services/facilities will be planned through the City's Capital Facilities Plan for
the subareas in the City's UGA.
C. The street reclassifications are consistent with the distribution of urban facilities and
services and fit subarea service areas within the City.
D. The street reclassifications are consistent with the comprehensive service and
facilities planning process and meet stated City standards.
E The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, specifically those listed in Finding 5.
F. The proposed street reclassificatons are in the public interest.
Commissioner King seconded the motion which passed 4 - 0.
Revise Urban Growth Area (UGA) east boundary line to Deer Park
Road (generally) and north of Highway 101 along Buchannan Drive.
Planning Director Collins reviewed the Planning Department's report recommending
approval of the proposal. As the City only has jurisdiction within the City limits, not in the
Urban Growth Area (UGA), this action would constitute a recommendation to the County
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26, 1999
Page 7
for their approval during the year 2000. The current proposal is only the first step in
enlarging the City's Urban Growth Area (UGA) and is intending to show support by the City
for such a move. The City did not support an extension of the UGA to this area in 1995
when it was first proposed by the County. The process could take several years. The City
reviews its Comprehensive Plan in May of each year. The County reviews its Plan after the
first of January.
The County feels that this amendment process is premature until the County raises the issue
of amendment to the UGA. The City sees it as a policy determination. The County's
amendment process does not allow for individuals to request a change in the UGA.
Therefore, this could be viewed as the applicant not requesting that the County change the
UGA boundary, but requesting that the City change its previous recommendation via the
Comprehensive Plan process which recognizes the City's policy regarding where the UGA
boundary should be. As such, it is an appropriate review question. The City would not
change its Comprehensive Plan until the County concurs with the amendment.
Significant commercial development is occurring east of the City's Urban Growth Area
(UGA) in conflict with the State's Growth Management Plan. There are no service providers
that can provide infrastructure needed for continued development except the City. Water is
currently being purchased from the City and resold to the area through the P.U.D. The
amendment would allow the bulk of the commercial development occurring east of the
City's UGA boundary to at some time in the future, be included in the City, and would allow
the City to begin planning for that incorporation. The City would not consider annexation
until the needed infrastructure could be provided within a reasonable period of time.
Letters from Andy Duran, President of the Four Seasons Maintenance Division, and Larry
Byme, a resident of the Cedar Park area were received and noted.
Vice Chair Hewins opened the public hearing.
Craig Miller, 230 East Fifth Street, represented the applicants. He agreed with staff's report
and analysis. Over the past 5 to 6 years the Juhaszs have attempted to develop a property
located west of Buchannan Drive without success. It is anticipated that even if this
amendment is approved, annexation with the extension of services could take 10 to 15 years.
One side (south) of Highway 101 is currently developing as heavy commercial where the
opposite side where the Juhasz property is located is being held to status quo. The project
described as the "Deer Park Gateway" would allow the area to serve as the gateway to Port
Angeles and would therefore be logical as being within the City's UGA.
The County originally proposed the City's eastern UGA to be where the proposal suggests.
The City opposed the designation and over a period of time, the County moved the line west
to the current UGA boundary at the west rim of Morse Creek Canyon. Intense commercial
development was not discouraged with that designation. Approval of the proposal would
incorporate those areas that are currently developing with heavy commercial into the City's
UGA which would be in compliance with the State's GMA guidelines.
Andy Duran, President of the Four Seasons Maintenance Commission, 673 Strait View
Drive, stated that many people in the Four Seasons Ranch believe that annexation to the City
301.
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26. 1999
Page 8
would really benefit the Ranch. City services would be welcome by the residents. However,
the Ranch residents are very concerned that if the Juhasz property is annexed to the City,
potential runoff from parking lots and more intensive residential development could be very
detrimental to the community. The potential for landslides and seepage fi.om up hill effluent
is a concern. He will be talking to the County regarding whether the Ranch community is
for or against this proposal at a later date.
Tim Rymer, 412 Cedar Park Drive, spoke as President of the Cedar Park Homeowner's
Association, expressed strong objection to the proposal even as a policy decision. There is
nothing new in the development pattern in this area - no surprises. Five years ago, the City
agreed that the UGA boundary should be the west boundary. The City has plenty of area that
is designated within the UGA that has not been annexed. There is no justification to change
the UGA because one commercial property owner cannot develop in a manner that is
acceptable to him. The Cedar Park Drive Homeowner's Association appealed the County's
initial proposal to set the City's eastern UGA boundary as the east rim of Morse Creek ravine
and are still opposed to such a determination. Services in the area are adequate, there is no
justification for this amendment.
Jane Floyd, 93 Sea View Drive, was not opposed to the proposal but wanted all of Four
Seasons Ranch to be treated the same, either all in or out of the UGA.
Andy Meyer, County Planning Director, 223 East Fourth Street, indicated that the City's
Planning Director has characterized the issue relatively well. The County is still in
disagreement on a couple of points. The County's overall concerns are with the process
which is premature. The issue that is appropriately before the City is whether or not the City
is interested in making application to the County to pursue a UGA boundary amendment.
The County's Plan outlines the UGA amendment process that includes several criteria to
amend the boundary that need to be addressed before the City issue of amending its
Comprehensive Plan. He did not feel that the City should be dealing with a SEPA threshold
at this time. The SEPA checklist is inadequate and erroneous. A policy question doesn't
necessitate a SEPA threshold determination. If the City wishes to pursue the proposal as an
amendment to its Comprehensive Plan, the SEPA checklist should be revised in detail.
A Comprehensive Plan Map change should not occur until after the City makes application
for a UGA boundary amendment application following the County's criteria, and after a
thorough analysis of the reasons for such a proposed change including a thorough SEPA
review.
In response to Commissioner Reed, Director Meyer stated that the County is not saying it
is inappropriate to look at an amendment to the UGA boundary. He is concerned that this
is a policy issue at this point and not an amendment.
In response to Commissioner Reed, Tim Rymer, as an employee of the Washington State
Department of Fish and Wildlife, stated that the County has a more clear understanding of
the Morse Creek watershed needs and fish restoration than does City staff.
Mr. Meyer stated in response to Commissioner Reed that in actuality the City's adoption of
3 0 2
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26. 1999
Page 9
a policy directive to look at amendment to the UGA probably would accelerate a UGA
amendment process at the County.
Andy Duran, reminded the Commission that it took about three years of contant effort to
establish a good working with the Elwha Tribe, Department of Fisheries, and with the
County. They have a good working relationship and he expects it to continue.
Craig Miller, agreed that the County works best with an application pending. The City's
current amendment application would assuredly bring the matter to the County's attention.
It may be a chicken and the egg question because there are two amendment processes to
follow through with and they do not coincide time wise. It may be appropriate to leave the
current issue pending while a County application is processed.
The Juhasz proposal for development was permitted under two different permits at two
different times. Following the UGA final designation, the property ended up outside the area
that permits the proposal they have. Given the fact that the County originally proposed this
area as being in the UGA, the fact that the Juhasz are still hanging and interested in
development, and the City is not in conflict with the process, the process should be favorably
considered.
Planning Director Collins corrected earlier testimony that Morse Creek is not the eastern
UGA boundary. The western rim of the Morse Creek Canyon is the current easternUGA
boundary. He agreed that the County can deal with fish problems more adequately than the
City. However, the County is not in a position to deal with waste water treatment problems.
There is no challenge to the fact that the County will make the final decision on this issue,
but this is a method designed to put that question before the County for consideration. The
City would not object to turning over the SEPA process to the County if the County desires
to be lead agency.
There being no further testimony, Vice Chair Hewins closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Reed did not see that there is a valid need at this time to amend the boundary
which can be supported. The current development and protection of Morse Creek Watershed
can be dealt with by the County. There is no lack of developable area within the current
UGA at this time.
Commissioner Hewins views this as a proposal for the City to begin to bring the area into
its planning process for future development, perhaps 10 to 15 years hence. Annexation is
a long term thing. The proposal would not change growth patterns until annexation is
approved at a future date. The amendment would allow the City's plans to be more far
reaching for future development.
Commissioner King agreed with Commissioner Hewins analysis that this is a very
preliminary position.
Commissioner Reed felt that this is the first step toward annexation at some future date. The
area under consideration may not be desirable for higher density development. A large group
303
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26, 1999
Page 10
of property owners are not asking for this change, but a single applicant making a request for
future commercial gain.
Commissioner King moved to recommend approval of the amendment as a policy to
the City Council. The motion died for lack of a second.
Commissioner Reed moved to continue the item to the June 9 meeting and directed
staff to prepare alternate findings and conclusions. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Robotkay and passed 4 - 0.
(C) Revision of the City's Planning Areas defined in the
Comprehensive Plan to align with Census Tract Boundaries.
Planning Director Collins presented the staff's report recommending approval of the
proposed amendment. Vice Chair Hewins opened the public hearing.
There being no one present to speak, Vice Chair Hewins closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Robotkay moved to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to the City Council with the following findings and conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(D),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port
Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. All information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(D),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the
public hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation have been
considered in this decision and is considered a part thereof.
2. This proposal applies city-wide, and the boundaries are shown on a revised Planning
Areas Map (Attachment A).
3. The City and Clallam County staff working on the Census 2000 determined that there
was an opportunity to change the Port Angeles area census tracts to reflect changes
in the development pattern and identifiable boundaries that have occurred over the
considerable time since the Census Tracts were last revised. The primary change in
the Census Tract boundaries was to conform to the Planning Area boundaries, and
where a Census Tract boundary requirement was paramount the Planning Area
boundary was modified.
4. The 1994 Comprehensive Plan for the City of Port Angeles established five Planning
Areas that could be used in identifying different areas of the community and potential
neighborhood subareas.
304
Planning Commission Minutes
Ma)' 26, 1999
Page 11
5. To fit within allowable Census Tract population ranges and considering future
populations that may be annexed into the City, a new East Planning Area based on
population distributions east of Race Street was created, and the North Central
Planning Area was slightly modified to follow the Tumwater Truck Route on the
west and Lauridsen Boulevard on the south.
6. The boundaries anticipate inclusion of the Urban Growth Areas in the future of the
East, South Central, and Southwest Planning Areas.
7. The primary boundaries between Planning Areas are major arterials and the marine
bluff.
8. Previously there was no east boundary for the North Central Planning Area, other
than the City Limits, which included subareas that were not well connected to the
North Central neighborhood subareas.
9. Lauridsen Boulevard and Race Street are planned in the Comprehensive Plan as
major arterials.
10. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)
on May 18, 1999. This action fulfills the City's responsibility under SEPA.
11. This is an areawide Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and public notice was
provided by legal notice published in the Peninsula Daily News.
12. The Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies idenitified as being the most relevant
to the proposal were Growth Management Element Goal A, Policies A 1-17,
Objective A-l, Land Use Element Goal A, Policies A 1-2, Land Use Element Goal
B, Land Use Element Goal C, Policy C 1, Land Use Element Goal E, and Policy E
7.
Conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(D),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed
findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby concludes the following:
A. Since the Planning Areas and Census Tracts were nearly coincidental, it rational to
modify each to be even more coincidental for future statistical analysis purposes.
B. Neighborhood subareas such as above and below the Boulevard between the North
Central and South Central and west of the 8th Street bridges and north of Airport and
Lincoln Park for the Northwest Planning Area are fairly easy to identify.
C. The new boundary at Race Street (and Heart of the Hills Parkway) is okay south of
Lauridsen Boulevard but less so north of there. An alternate North Central boundary
of Lauridsen Boulevard east to White's Creek Ravine does not work for Census
3. -5
Planning Commission Minutes
May 26, 1999
Page 12
Tracts revisions within the existing City Limits. Since Lauridsen Boulevard and
Race Street are planned in the Comprehensive Plan as major arterials, it is expected
that they will be even more definable Planning Area boundaries in the future.
D. The proposed Planning Area revisions follow the development patterns and physical
features that separate the community into identifiable neighborhood subareas and
logical urban service areas.
E The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, specifically those listed in Finding 12.
F. The revised Planning Areas are in the public interest.
Commissioner Reed seconded the motion which passed 4 - 0.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None.
STAFF REPORTS
1. Annexation Study
Director Collins reviewed staff's memorandum regarding actions taken to date in discussion
of long range annexation planning issues. Some discussion occurred following which it was
decided to recommend that the City proceed with a supplemental environmental impact
statement (SEIS) using Growth Management Funds at this time.
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
None
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
Brad Collins, Secretary Fred Hewins, Vice Chair
PREPARED BY: S. Roberds
306
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
June 9, 1999
7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Fred Hewins, Fred Norton, Jason Robotkay,
Bob King
Members Excused: Mary Craver,Linda Nutter, Dean Reed
Staff`Present: Brad Collins, Sue Roberds, Dan McKeen
Public Present: Andy Duran
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner King moved to approve the May 26,1999, meeting minutes as presented.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Robotkay and passed 3 - 0 with
Commissioner Norton abstaining due to absence.
OLD BUSINESS
1999 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS:
C. Revise Urban Growth Area (UGA) east boundary line to Deer Park
Road (generally) and north of Highway 101 along Buchanan Drive. (The
public hearing for this issue was closed at the May 26, 1999, meeting.)
Commissioner Norton noted for the record that he had listened to the tapes of the May 26,
1999, public hearing and reviewed the minutes in order to participate in the final deliberation
for this issue.
Vice Chair Hewins asked Planning Director Collins to review the background for the issue
and the action that is pending.
Commissioner Norton stated that the proposal provides the beginning for future practical
planning efforts in light of ongoing development east of the City's UGA and moved to
approve Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 99-01(C) based on the following
findings and conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(C),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port
3.07
Planning Commission Minutes
June 9, 1999
Page 2
Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. All information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(C),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the
public hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation have been
considered in this decision and is considered a part thereof.
2. The applicants are Norbert and Michelle Juhasz, represented by Linda Nutter and
Craig Miller, and they are requesting an extension of the eastern Port Angeles Urban
Growth Area (Attachment A).
3. The Urban Growth Area (UGA) extension is shown on the Planning Department map
(Attachment B) to include property in and east of Morse Creek Ravine, generally
described as an extension of the existing UGA boundary eastward from south margin
of the BPA power lines to the east margin of the Deer Park Road fight-of-way
(including the Four Seasons Ranch and Four Seasons Park developments), then north
to the General Commercial zoning designation, then east following the GC zone
boundary, then north including the GC, RLC, P, and RI zones, and extending north
to the International (US-Canada) Boundary in the Strait of Juan de Fuca.
4. The subject area is located east of the City's existing UGA including properties in
Sections 5-8 and 17-18, Range 5 West and Township 30 North.
5. Existing land uses within the subject area are as follows:
* Low density residential, public lands, and critical areas within the
Morse Creek Ravine
* Public lands (including a park and a trail), General Commercial
(including a movie theater and a ear dealership), and Rural Limited
Commercial (including a restaurant, a gravel pit, and shooting range)
along US 101
* Low density residential west of Deer Park Road and south of the GC
zone
* Low density residential north of the RLC zone
6. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)
under WAC 197-11-340(2) on May 18, 1999, regarding this request. Following the
comment period for this action, the threshold determination was withdrawn, based
on comments received from Clallam County, Four Seasons Ranch, and Cedar Park
Homeowners Association representatives. On June 4, 1999, the SEPA Responsible
Official adopted the existing Environmental Impact Statement for a similar UGA
action issued by Clallam County on June 13, 1995. The City's responsibility under
the State Environmental Policy Act (RCW 43.21 C) are fulfilled by this action.
7. This is an areawide Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and public notice was
provided by legal notice and a paid advertisement in the Peninsula Daily News.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 9, 1999
Page 3
8. The Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies identified as being the most relevant to
the proposal were Growth Management Element Goal A, Policies A 1-17, Objective
· A-I, Land Use Element Goal A, and Policies A 1-2.
9. The County Port Angeles Region Zoning Map designations the subject area as R1,
P, GC, and RLC.
10. The subject area was included in the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area as originally
adopted by Clallam County.
11. Morse Creek has been identified as habitat for Puget Sound chinook salmon, which
have been listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.
12. The Four Seasons Ranch and the Four Seasons Park residential developments have
experienced waste water system failures, which were a cause for Clallam County to
originally adopt an Urban Growth Area boundary to include the proposed area.
13. Public testimony was given by the Clallam County Planning Director, Four Seasons
Ranch Maintenance Commission President, and Cedar Park Homeowners
Association President opposing CPA 99-01(C).
14. The City of Port Angeles cannot provide and does not plan for urban services such
· as sanitary sewer systems outside the Urban Growth Area.
15. The County-Wide Planning Policy identifies policies related to the designation of
urban growth areas, including Urban Growth Area Policy No.3 which requires UGA
to include areas characterized by urban growth adjacent to city boundaries and Urban
Growth Area Policy No. 6 which prohibits lands designated for commercial or
industrial uses which encourage adjacent urban development being located outside
a UGA.
Based on the information provided in the May 26, 1999, Staff Report for CPA 99-01(C),
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed
findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby concludes the following:
A. The proposed UGA extension includes areas that are characterized by urban
development and, therefore, appropriately should be part of the Port Angeles Urban
Growth Area.
B. Urban facilities and services needed to serve the proposed area can be provided by
the City of Port Angeles.
C. The listing of Puget Sound chinook salmon in Morse Creek as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act may necessitate sewer system improvements in the subject
area.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 9, 1999
Page 4
D. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, specifically those listed in Finding 8.
E. The City of Port Angeles cannot plan or provide urban facilities and services outside
its Urban Growth Area, even though the area is characterized by urban development.
F. Property owners in the subject area have experienced problems that could be served
by urban facilities and services.
G. The proposed amendment is consistent with the County-Wide Planning Policy,
specifically those listed in Finding 15.
H. The proposed expansion of the Port Angeles Urban Growth Area would allow for the
planning of urban services to serve residential and commercial land uses that are
characterized as urban development and is in the public interest.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None.
STAFF REPORTS
As there are no scheduled public hearings for the June 23 meeting, the meeting was
cancelled.
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
None
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
ns, Secretary Fred Hewins, Vice Chair
PREPARED BY: S. Roberds
310
MINUTES
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
June 7, 1999
7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
Vice Chair Meyer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Gina Lowman, Louise Meyer, Theresa Schmid
Member Excused: Barbara Gase
Member Absent: Julie Bondy
Staff Present: David Sawyer
Public Present: Charles Albrecht
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Due to the absence of a quorum of Boardmembers for either the February or April meetings,
approval of the minutes was continued to the end of the meeting in the event Boardmember Bondy
arrived late.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
VARIANCE APPLICATION - VAR 99-04 - MALONE, 1834 West 12th
Street: Request for a reduction of the rear yard setback to allow a cover
over an existing deck in the PBP, Public Buildings and Parks zone.
Senior Planner Sawyer reviewed the Planning Department's report recommending approval of the
variance with two conditions. Vice Chair Meyer opened the public hearing.
Charles Ulbrecht, 1695 South Bagley Creek Road, was present for questions. He apologized for
not obtaining the proper permits prior to construction of the addition. The project is a Clallam
County housing rehabilitation project.
There being no questions or further testimony, Vice Chair Meyer closed the public hearing.
Boardmember Lowman moved to approve the variance as proposed citing the following
conditions, findings, and conclusions:
Conditions of /lpproval:
1. Approval of this variance is limited to a reduction of the rear yard setback from 20
feet to 17 feet for the construction as submitted by the applicant and included in
Attachment A and hereby conditioned.
Board of Adjustment Minutes
June 7, 1999
Page 2
2. The ramp shall be completed per the specifications of the American Disabilities Act.
Findings:
Based on the staffreport analysis, public review and comment, the Board of Adjustment's discussion
and deliberation, the Board of Adjustment hereby finds that:
1. The applicant, Larry Malone, submitted a variance application for the property
located at 1834 W. 12th Street on May 11, 1999 (see Attachment A of the June 7,
1999 Staff Report for VAR 99-04).
2. The request is to reduce the required rear yard setback from 20 feet to 17 feet in order
to add a covered handicapped accessible entry ramp to a single-family residence.
3. The subject property is impacted by an approximately 10' slope at the north end of
the property.
4. The property is designated as Low Density Residential in the City's Comprehensive
Plan.
5. The property is zoned Public Buildings and Parks (PBP).
6. The proposed use is a permitted use in the PBP zone if developed to the requirements
of the RS7 zone.
7. The subject property is 7,000 square feet in size with a width of 50' and a depth of
140'.
8. Most lots in this area are relatively level. Some lots are similarly sloped downward
to the north. Others are impacted by a Class II wetland located north of the subject
site.
9. In order to compensate for the sloping terrain, the residence was located as far south
as permitted.
10. City records indicate the Board of Adjustment approved VAR 73(7)8 which reduced
the rear yard set back of the property located at 1117 W. 11th Street from to six feet.
11. No agency reviewing the application identified any potential adverse impact to the
public health, safety, and welfare attributable to the issuance of the variance.
12. The City SEPA Responsible Official determined the proposed variance is
categorically exempt from State Environmental Protection Act threshold
determination and environmental impact statement requirements.
312
Board of Adjustment Minutes
June 7, 1999
Page 3
Conclusions:
Based on the staffreport analysis, public review and comment, the Board of Adjustment's discussion
and deliberation, and the findings listed above, the Board of Adjustment hereby concludes that:
A. The proposed variance will not have any impact on the surrounding properties.
B. The slope of the property impacts its buildable area in a manner that the majority of
other properties in the vicinity are not.
C. The slope of the property is a special circumstance related to the topography of
the subject property that deprives the property owners of rights and privileges
permitted to other properties in the vicinity and the PBP and RS-7 zones.
D. Based on the previous approval of VAR 73(7)8, approval of the proposed variance
would not be a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses
of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property on behalf of which
the application was filed is located.
E. The proposed variance will not adversely impact the public health, safety, or
welfare.
The motion was seconded by Boardmember Schmid and passed 3 - 0.
Planner Sawyer reminded the applicant to contact the Building Division as soon as possible.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None.
STAFF REPORTS
Planner Sawyer welcomed Boardmember Schmid to the Board.
REPORTS OF BOARDMEMBERS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
David Sawyer, Secretary Louise Meyer, Vice Chair
PREPARED BY: S. Roberds 3 1 3
314