HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 06/17/2002
.
WAS H I N G TON, U S. A.
~ORT .ANGELES
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
321 EAST FIFTH STREET
June 17, 2002
SPECIAL MEETING - 4:30 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING - 6:00 p.m.
A. CALL TO ORDER - SPECIAL MEETING (4:30 p.m.)
B. WORK SESSION 1
Capital Facilities Plan I Transportation Improvement Plan (continued from June 4,2002 City Council Meetmg)
.
C. CALL TO ORDER - Regular Meeting (6:00 p.m.)
ROLL CALL -
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -
PUBLIC CEREMONIES, PRESENTATIONS
AND PROCLAMATIONS
1. Rotary recogmtion - east entrance to CIty
beaunfication program
2. Jettin' the Straits recognition by Bob Harbick
3. Multi-Cultural Proclamation
o
Recogmtion
o
11
Recognition by Mr. Harbick
Read Proclamanon
D. LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON TillS OR FUTURE AGENDAS (By Council, Staffor Public) AND
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA (ThiS IS the opportunity for members of the public to speak
to the City Council about anything not on the agenda, please keep comments to 5-10 minutes)
E. FINANCE
Insntutional Network Implementation Consulting
Contract Amendment
.
F. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City Council Minutes - Regular Meeting of June 4,
2002
2. Check Register - June 11,2002 - $663,529.60
3. Electronic Payments - June 7,2002 - $149,998.27
4. Payroll Information - June 9; 2002 - $460,753.41
5. Award contracts for Compo sting Control and
Aeration System Equipment (Project No. 22-12),
Port Angeles Landfill Co-composting FacIlity
Improvements (Project No. 22-14), and Reallocate
Funds
6. Final Acceptance S & B Installation of SCADA
Phase II, Project No. 21.22
7. Award Contract for Rayonier Mill TraIl
Improvements
8. Amendment to Lease Agreement with Puget
Sound Pilots
13
Approve Amendment to Contract
17
Accept Consent Agenda
25
37
39
41
45
47
49
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
June 17, 2002 Port Angeles CIty Council Meetmg
Page - 1
G. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
H. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS
I. RESOLUTIONS
J. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
1. Mantooth Annexation Request 55
2. Petersen Short Plat Appeal 61
K. PUBLIC HEARINGS - QUASI-JUDICIAL
(7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter)
Approve Election Ballot
Deny Appeal
L. PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER
1. Comprehensive Plan Amendments - CPA 02-
01 (Continued from June 4 CouncIl Meeting)
2. Capital Facilities Plan I Transportation
Improvement Plan
3. Municipal Code Amendments 01-02B
71
Adopt Ordinance
see
A.
172
Open Public Hearing & Continue to
July 2, 2002
Open Public Hearing &
Continue to July 16, 2002
M. INFORMATION
1. City Manager's CalendarlProject Status Report (page 238)
· 2001 Annual Recycling Report (Page 240)
2. Hurricane Ridge PDA Report - June 2002 (page 242)
3. Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission Minutes - May 9, 2002 (Page 244)
4. Planning Commission Minutes - May 22, 2002 (page 248)
5. Department of Community Development Monthly Report - May 2002 (Page 262)
6. Public Works & Utlhties Monthly Report - May 2002 (Page 264)
7. Fire Department Monthly Report - May 2002 (Page 266)
8. Police Department Monthly Report - May 2002 (Page 270)
M. EXECUTIVE SESSION (As needed and determined by City Attorney)
N. ADJOURNMENT
"",
" ", PUBLIC HEARINGS, ,
Public hearings are set by the City Council in order to meet legal reqUIrements pertaining to matters such as, la'nd,use permit applications, proposed
amen,dments to Cjty land use regula,tion~, zoning changes, annexations. In addition, the City Council may set a public,hearing if! order to receive
public input prior to making decisions which il11pact the citizens. Certain matters may be controversial, and the City Council may choose'to seek
public opinion through the public hearing process.'
G \CNCLPKT\AGENDA\02-0617 wpd
.
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES A V AILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
June 17, 2002 Port Angeles City CouncIl Meeting
Page - 2
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, USA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
I.
~MtJL
CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING:
II. ROLL CALL:
Members Present:
Mayor Wiggins
Councilman Braun
Councilman Campbell
Councilmember Erickson
Councilman Headrick
Councilmember Rogers
Councilman Williams
Staff Present:
Manager Quinn
Attorney Knutson
Clerk Upton
~
J
V
J
at&,^t
\I
,/
.
B. Collins
M. Connelly
G. Cutler
D. McKeen
T. Riepe
y. Ziomkowski
June 1742002
<I &5. f" 'fr\. ·
was. p'~ .
11"","--,-
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Led by: Pw 4 ().. <;;);;'1) (I~.J ll.v"1eJ'~
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
· ~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON. USA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Attendance Roster
DATE OF MEETING: June 17.2002
LOCATION: City Council Chambers
J"' 'J...
/61
S c.7~,_') QJ-"l/Y,>re Itu/~ ?A
City of Port Angeles
~ORT ANGELES
Ordinance/Resolution Distribution List
WAS H I N G TON. USA
City Council Meeting of
June 17. 2002
l " ~
'.
~ <tio
" ~ :~~&'1 ,.,
l
It~ (' (}IYJ~
, D () /I fA.
j;;
City Manager
City Atty. (1) J ./
Planning 1/
CIty Clerk (2) ~V
Deputy Clerk (1) J- V
Personnel
Cust. Svcs.
Finance
Dir .IMgr.
Police Dept.
Fire Dept.
Light Dept. ,
Pub. Works (2) :;/
Parks & Rec.
MRSC (1) Jv"
PDN (Summary) \.).1J M.~ .;
Extra Copies
,4~Oo ,I
I TOTAL I a
.
j?: :0: 'RT'I'PJ.i N:G.EI 'L: Ef"IIS:
,tp' v' 'r ' I , , , ' ,
l ~ ~v _~ ~
: v
I ,
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
June 17,2002
To:
MA YOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities p,Crt../
SUBJECT:
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Workshop (Continued) and Public Hearing
.
Summary: The State requires that the City annually update the CFP and TIP for planning and
funding of capital projects. A public hearing is required to receive input regarding projects and
additions to the CFP/TIP. The TIP projects are included in the transportation element of the CFP, but
need to be listed in the separate TIP to meet state requirements. A workshop will be held prior to the
public hearing to familiarize Council with the projects included in the CFP.
Recommendation: Conclude workshop started June 4,2002. Open the public hearing and
receive public input regarding the CFP and TIP for the years 2003 thru 2008. Continue the
I public hearin2 to July 2, 2002.
Back~round I Analysis: Annually the City is required by the State to update the CFP for
planning and funding of capital projects. The CFP is a project planning tool which covers all aspects
of infrastructure planning within the City and is utilized to plan for growth in the Urban Growth Area
(UGA) as well. The projects included in the CFP are those that are needed to meet the concurrency
requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA), transportation projects to be included in the
TIP, and other capital projects planned for the next six year period. All projects in the CFP and TIP
should be currently funded or have the source of potential funding identified. In order to receive
project funding in the form of grants and loans or require development funding of infrastructure
improvements, projects must be included in the CFP. The TIP is a transportation planning tool used
by Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to allocate funding of local agency
projects. The WSDOT will not fund transportation projects that are not included in the TIP.
Comments received on transportation projects will apply to both the CFP and TIP.
Enclosed is the CFP summary for 2002-2008. The six year CFP would normally include the years
2003 to 2008. The current year (2002) was included to provide an opportunity for comments on
proposed changes in funding and scheduling of this year's projects. City Staff identified and
prioritized projects that were approved for funding allocation during last year's CFP process. In
addition to the current projects, new projects have been recommended for funding allocation. While
the CFP and TIP are six-year planning tools the funding allocations cover the revisions for the
current year, 2002, and the year 2003.
.
N:\TEMP\2002CFPHRNGl wpd
Page 1/4
1
A binder containing the entire six-year CFP was provided for the workshop on June 4, 2002. .
Attached are summaries included in the CFP binder. The first summary, 2002 Governmental Fund
Projects, is a list of projects requiring funding from the general fund which has been prioritized on a
citywide basis. The second summary includes general fund projects (Fire, Police, Parks, and Streets)
and utility fund projects (Light, Solid Waste, Water, Wastewater, and the proposed Stormwater
Management) listed in departmental priority order. Please note that the street projects list also serves
as the TIP.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN OVERVIEW
The allocation of $2,432,000 in 2001 CFP has been reduced to $1,475,000 due to project execution.
An additional $500,000 has been identified as available surplus funds from the 2002 budget for a
total of$I,975,000 available for 2002-2003. The 2002-2003 CFP, as proposed, requires total funding
of $2,713,000 or an additional funding of$738,000 from the general fund. Pending decisions on
grants for the Carnegie Library restoration and surety funding of the Fire Station roof repairs may
reduce this shortfall.
Staff has worked on revising the list approved from last years approved CFP. A revised list of
prioritized projects and funding was developed for recommendation to Council. This list identifies
projects to be funded in the budget years 2002-2003.
The general approach for project prioritization was 1) projects that have non-City funds associated
with the project (leveraging funds of others), 2) projects with a potential of securing non-City funds
for accomplishment, 3) projects that will avoid future higher costs if accomplished, and 4) others.
.
The following is a recap of the basic strategy, key projects and funding options contained in the
proposed CFP. A more detailed description of each project and the strategy for implementing the
Comprehensive Plan policies is contained in each section of the Plan.
I. GENERAL FUND PROJECTS
The proposed six-year plan for the General Fund Projects total $26.8 million. Development
projects identified for the years 2002 and 2003 total $4.5 million. Projects identified in the
2003-2003 CFP for funding out of the general fund are as follows:
A. General: Laurel Street Slide Repair, Ennis Creek Estates, Ediz Hook Rip Rap
Repair, Renovate Carnegie Library, Gateway Parking, and Laurel Street Pavers
(Railroad to First Street)
B. Fire Department: Fire Station Roof Repairs.
C. Police Department: None
D. Parks Department: Waterfront Trail (Rayonier Site), William Shore Memorial
Pool Renovation, Olympic Discovery Trail (Rayonier to Morse Creek), Francis Street
Park Improvements, City East Entrance Street Trees/Improvements, Francis Street
Park Landscaping, and City Pier Dredging and Piling Replacement. .
N.\TEMP\2002CFPHRNG l.wpd
Page2/4
2
.
.
.
1.
TRANSPORTATION
The proposed six-year plan for the General Fund Projects total $65 million. Development
projects identified for the years 2002 and 2003 total $8.8 million. Projects that are funded
directly out of the general fund are identified as: Lauridsen Boulevard/Airport Road
Realignment, Street Bicycle Facilities/Racks/Striping, 81h Street Restoration, Sidewalk
Program, 81h Street Bridge Replacement Design, Ennis Creek Slide, ADA Curb
Ramps/Chirpers, and 81h Street Bridge Construction.
III UTILITY PROJECTS
The proposed six-year plan for the Utility Projects total $62.1 million. Development projects
identified for the years 2002 and 2003 total $9.9 million. This year we have included
storm water as a new utility. Should the storm water utility not be formed the proposed
projects will have to evaluated for inclusion in the wastewater utility or delayed until the
utility is formed.
Each utility is operated as a separate business funded by dedicated utility rates and
development charges. As such, it does not compete with other City projects funded by
general tax revenue. Utility projects identified in the CFP for funding out of the individual
utility funds for 2002 - 2003 are as follows:
A. Light Utility: Light Warehouse, Storage Mezzanines, Substation Circuit Switches,
Elwha Underground Rebuild, Fiber Optics Backbone, Ediz Hook Underground
Conversion, SCADA, as well as annual maintenance and replacements.
B. Solid Waste Utility: None
C. Water Utility: Concrete Cylinder Pipe Replacement, Peabody Reservoir Cover,
Annual Replacements, Downtown Waterline Replacement Phase Ill, Spruce Street
Fire Pump, New High Zone Southeast Reservoir, and Water Treatment Facility.
D. Wastewater Utility: Annual replacements, Pump Stations 1 & 3 Improvements,
Compost Facility Upgrade, III CSO Reduction, Septage Receiving Station, and
Annexation Interceptor Sewer Main.
E. Stormwater Utility: City wide catch basin modifications, Peabody Creek/Lincoln
Culvert Rehabilitation, Lincoln Street Storm Drain (4th to 7Ih), Stormwater Discharges
Over Bluff, and 10lh & N Regional Storm Detention Facility.
N
CONCLUSION
The 2003-2008 CFP represents continued progress in addressing the needs of the City. It is
recommended that the Council set the priorities during the workshop, request public input
during the hearing, and direct staff to return with a resolutions reflecting the priority list for
the 2003-2008 CFP and TIP as well as the allocation of funding from the Governmental
Fund for the projects in the years 2002 - 2003.
N:\TEMP\2002CFPHRNGl. wpd
Page3/4
3
The Public Hearing will be opened at the June 17,2002 Council Meeting and continued to
the July 2, 2002 meeting. At the July 2, 2002 meeting the public hearing should be closed
following input from the public and the list revised as needed prior to adoption of the
resolutions.
Attach. 2002 Governmental Fund and 2002-2008 CFP Summary
N:\TEMP\2002CFPHRNG l.wpd
Page4/4
4
.
.
.
.
2002 GOVERNMENTAL FUND PROJECTS
.
1 PK11-02 Waterfront Trail - Ravonier Mill Site 80,000 - 80 000 - 80,000
2 PK02-02 Wilham Shore Memonal Pool Renovation 3,500,000 225,000 25,000 200,000 225,000
3 PK03-02 Olvmolc Discoverv Trall-Ravonler to Morse Cr 290,000 - 36,000 114,000 150,000
4 FR02-02 Fire Stallon Roof Reoairs 568,000 - 568,000 - 568.000
5 PK01-00 Francis Street Imorovements 449,000 /JO,OOO - 10,000
6 TR40-99 Laundsen Blv /Airoort Road Realianment 2,123,000 "
00 - 125,000
7 GG12-99 Laurel Street Shde Reoair 225,000 ~ 160, 0 - 185 000
8 PK16-99 CltV East Entrance - Street Treesllmorovements 75,000 75, 0 25,000 50,000
9 TR20-99 Street Bicvcle Faclhtles/Racks/Stnolna 120,0 20,000 - 20,000
10 TR61-99 8th Street Restoration 2,000, , $: 65 000
11 TR74-99 Sidewalk Proeram 435:' 80 -510011: 5000Z! 50,000
12 GG05-00 EnniS Creek Estates 250, 100, 100000
13 GG01-02 Edlz Hook Rio Rao Reoalr 50,00' 50,000 50 000
14 GG02-99 Renovate CameCle Librarv 1,300,000 100 000 "~'\ip~~ A 100,000
15 TR01-01 8th Street Bridoe ReDia cement Deslen 1,400,000 ^ 50,000 230,000 280,000
16 TR02-01 EnniS Creek Shde 60,000 0000 - 60,000
17 PK12-02 FranCIS Street Pari< Landscaoina 80,000 " - 00 20,000 40,000
18 TR26-99 ADA Curb Ramos/Chiroers 100; 20 000 - 20,000
19 GG03-00 Gatewav Parl<ina - Aoorox 300 soaces 4; <<,04 90 000 it' 100,000 100,000
A'5OO;
20 PK09-02 CltV Pier Dredaina and Plhna Reolacement t;<,<1t ~-X-""~} ^ ,000 25,000 25,000
,":;<,,,-140,
21 GG02-01 Laurel Street Pavers /Railroad to 1 st Street) *0.0 v 50 000 50 000
-
22 TR01-02 8th Street Bndae Construction 00,0 - 360 000 360 000
{t~
TR 18-99 Lincoln/Laundsen Rechannel & Slenal 453, 25, - - -
GG01-01 Laurel Street Stair Reoair 225 25, <
- - -
GG13-99 Downtown Convention Center 2,00 4 - - -
TR42-99 Laundsen Blvd. Bridge Widening 2,82 , . . -
GG06-00 Gatewav Sian 60, . - -
PK05-02 Art Education Center at PAF 250,00 - - - -
PK10-02 Manne Lab Exoanslon <; 5,050,000 '"
- . - .
GG02-02 Purchase-School District Offlc 1,000,000 - - - -
4,953,000 1,599,000 1,564,000 1,149,000 2,713,000
,
,
nor Funds 1,475,000
Funds Available s , 500,000
TOTAL 1,975,000
.
5/30/01
N.lCFP/SPREADSHEETS/AI1oc02
5
2002. 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECTS
PROJECT TITLE
GG08-99 City Server & Software UDOrades 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 N N
GG12-99 laurel SI. Slide Repair 225,000 185,000 185,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 185,000 N N
GG05.00 Ennis Creek Estates 250,000 100,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 N N
GG06-00 Gateway Sign at Deer Park 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 N N
1 GG01-02 Edlz Hook Rip Rap Repair 60,000 50,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 Y Y
2 GG02.99 Renovate Carnegie llbrarv 1,300,000 500,000 763,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,063,000 Y N
3 GG 13-99 Downtown Convenhon Center 2,000,000 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 700,000 N N
4 GG03.Q0 Gatewav Parkmg 4,500,000 100,000 0 100,000 1,400,000 3,000,000 0 0 0 4,500,000 Y N
5 GG01-01 laurel SI. Stair Repair 200,000 200,000 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 N N
6 GG02.Q1 laurel SI. Pavers [Railroad Ave - 1st St.1 350,000 350,000 0 50,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 350,000 N N
7 GG02.Q2 Purchase School Dlst Office Property 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 N N
GENERAL PROJECTS
FR01-01 Replace SCBA Compressor 32,000 32,000 16,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,000 N N
1 FR02-02 Fire Station Roof Repair 568,000 568,000 568,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 568,000 N N
2 FR02-01 Replace Expired SCBA Bottles 30,000 30,000 0 0 7,000 0 23,000 0 0 30,000 N Y
3 FR10-99 Replace Truck 4 650,000 650,000 0 0 0 650,000 0 0 0 650,000 N N
4 FRO 1-02 Replace Pumoer 275,000 275,000 0 0 0 0 0 275,000 0 275,000 N N
5 FR05-99 East Side Fire Station 1,850,000 0 0 0 1,850,000 0 0 0 0 1,850,000 Y N
6 FR07-99 West Side Fire Station 1,350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y N
FIRE PROJECTS
POLICE PROJECTS
Radio Communlcallons
Police Stallon Addition
PK25-99 Waterfront Trail - Valle;! Creek 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y N
PKO 1-00 FranCIS Slreetlmprovements 449,000 199,000 12,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,000 Y N
PK11-02 Waterfront Ta,1 - Ravonler Mill SlIe 80,000 80,000 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 N N
PK12-02 Francis Street Park - landscape 80,000 80,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 0 0 80,000 N N
1 PK 16-99 City East Entrance - Street Trees/Improvements 75,000 75,000 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 N N
2 PK03-02 Olvmplc D,scoverv Trail - Ravonler to Morse Cre 290,000 150,000 36,000 254,000 0 0 0 0 0 290,000 Y N
3 PK09-02 CltV Pier Dredolng & PIling Renlacement 140,000 140,000 0 25,000 115,000 0 0 0 0 140,000 N Y
4 PK02-02 William Shore Memorial Pool Renovallon 3,500,000 225,000 25,000 200,000 0 3,275,000 0 0 0 3,500,000 N N
5 PK07 -02 Shane Park Renovahon 110,000 110,000 0 0 110,000 0 0 0 0 110,000 N N
6 PK06-02 Elks Playfield 70,000 70,000 0 0 70,000 0 0 0 0 70,000 N N
7 PK08-02 Nelahborhood Park Renovation Program 150,000 150,000 0 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 N N
8 PK04.Q2 llncoln Park BUildings 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 150,000 N N
9 PK02-99 llncoln Park Enhancements 40,000 40,000 0 0 40,000 0 0 0 0 40,000 Y N
10 PK03-99 Construct New Parks Shoo/Apoaratus Storace 160,000 160,000 0 0 0 160,000 0 0 0 160,000 N N
11 PK05-02 Art Educahon Center at PAFAC 250,000 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 Y N
12 PK01.02 Cltv PlerlHollvwood Beach Renovalion 85,000 85,000 0 20,000 65,000 0 0 0 0 85,000 Y N
13 PK18-99 Covered Tennis Courts 15,000 15,000 0 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 15,000 Y N
14 PK62-99 Golf Course/Rec Comnlex 5.000 5,000 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 5,000 N N
15 PK10-02 Marine lab Expansion 5,050,000 0 0 0 1,000,000 4,000,000 0 0 0 5,000,000 Y N
16 PK05-99 IceIYouth PaVilion 35,000 35,000 0 0 35,000 0 0 0 0 35,000 N N
PARKS PROJECTS
TOTAL OF MANDATED GENERAL FUND PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL GENERAL FUND PROJECTS
.
.
.
.
2002-2008 CAPITAL .TIES PROJECTS
.
PROJECT TITLE
TR40-99 Laundsen Blvd/Airport Road Reahgnment 2,123,000 125,000 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 125,000 N N
TR61-99 8th Street ReconstructIon 2,000,000 255,000 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 65,000 Y N
TR01-00 Front Street Sidewalk 213,000 40,000 189,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 189,000 Y N
TR03-00 "I" Street SIdewalk 150,000 40,000 25,000 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 Y N
TR04-00 Laundsen Blvd Sidewalk (Jones-Llbertvl 100,000 20,000 15,000 85,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 Y N
TR08-00 5th/Race St Signal/Overlay 186,000 18,600 171,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 171,000 Y N
1 TR03-01 PaVIng/Chip Seal Program 1,500,000 1,500,000 300,000 300,000 0 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,800,000 N N
2 TR48-99 OlympIC Peninsula Inti Gateway 4,717,999 18,333 626,000 4,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 4,626,000 Y N
3 TRll-99 8th Street Bndges Repairs 100,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 N Y
4 TR01-01 8th Street Bndge Replacement Deslon 1,400,000 280,000 50,000 1,350,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,400,000 Y N
5 TR01-02 8th Street Bndge Construcllon 15,000,000 3,000,000 0 360,000 7,140,000 7,500,000 0 0 0 15,000,000 Y N
6 TR02-01 Ennis Street Shde Repair 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 Y N
7 TR74-99 Sidewalk Program 435,000 350,000 25,000 25,000 35,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 285,000 N N
8 TR26-99 ADA Curb Ramps/Ch.rpers 100,000 100,000 20,000 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 N Y
9 TR20-99 Street Bicycle Faclhtles/Racks/Stnpmg 120,000 120,000 20,000 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 N N
10 TR02-00 FIrst Street Sidewalk (EnniS - Golf Course) 200,000 50,000 0 30,000 170,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 Y N
11 TR33-99 Peabody Street Reconstruction IFront - 8th! 300,000 60,000 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 Y N
12 TR05-00 Laundsen Blvd SIdewalk [Vme - Francis] 100,000 20,000 0 15,000 85,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 Y N
13 TR80-99 Laundsen BlvdlWashlngton Street Reconstruct 250,000 50,000 0 0 0 40,000 210,000 0 0 250,000 Y N
14 TR42-99 Laundsen Blvd Bndge Wldenmg 2,820,000 564,000 0 0 0 250,000 2,000,000 570,000 0 2,820,000 Y N
-...J 15 TR18-99 Lmcoln/Blvd Rechannehzatlon and Signal 453,000 90,600 0 0 0 0 25,000 32,000 396,000 453,000 Y N p
16 TR17-99 Truck Route at US 1 01 Intersechon 1,150,000 1,150,000 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 850,000 1,150,000 y N
17 TRll-00 10lh St Sidewalk I'N' St . 'M' Stl 375,000 200,000 0 40,000 335,000 0 0 0 0 375,000 Y N
18 TR09-00 16th Street SIdewalk 1'1' SI. - 'F' Sll 250,000 75,000 0 40,000 210,000 0 0 0 0 250,000 Y N
19 TR12-00 10lh St Sidewalk I'M' St - '" SI J 375,000 200,000 0 40,000 335,000 0 0 0 0 375,000 Y N
20 TR10-00 16th Street SIdewalk ['F' SI. - Stevens Sch! 230,000 55,000 0 0 30,000 200,000 0 0 0 230,000 Y N
21 TR02-99 1 st and Peabodv Signal 200,000 20,000 0 0 8,000 192,000 0 0 0 200,000 Y N
22 TR12-99 Park Avenue Reconslruchon [Peabodv . Racel 1,000,000 200,000 0 0 100,000 900,000 0 0 0 1,000,000 Y N
23 TR10-99 10lh Street Reconstruction ['N' - Milwaukee! 700,000 140,000 0 0 70,000 630,000 0 0 0 700,000 Y N
24 TR07 -00 Park Ave Sidewalk JRace . lIbertv! 400,000 200,000 0 0 50,000 350,000 0 0 0 400,000 Y N
25 TR04-99 Laurel StreeVAhlvers Road Reconstruction 1,200,000 200,000 0 0 0 200,000 1,000,000 0 0 1,200,000 y N
26 TR16-99 18th Street Reconstruction r'E' - Landfill1 3,300,000 3,300,000 0 0 0 300,000 3,000,000 0 0 3,300,000 N N
27 TR 13-00 N' Street Sidewalk 114th SI. - 18th St! 250,000 75,000 0 0 0 40,000 210,000 0 0 250,000 y N
28 TR21-99 Laundsen Blvd ReconstructIon ITrk Rt - 'L'! 1,800,000 360,000 0 0 180,000 1,620,000 0 0 0 1,800,000 Y N
29 TR32-99 91h Street WIdening 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 N N
30 TR35-99 Laurel/Laundsen SIgnal 175,000 35,000 0 0 25,000 150,000 0 0 0 175,000 Y N
31 TR13-99 CIty-WIde Traffic SrgnallnterconnecVPre-emptlo 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 500,000 0 0 500,000 N N
32 TR06-99 8th and "C" Street Signal 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 200,000 N N
33 TR05-99 HIli Streetlntersecllon Reconstruct.on 300,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 300,000 Y N
34 TR14-00 Airport Industnal Park Streets 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 565,000 868,000 567,000 0 2,000,000 y N
35 TR07 -99 Milwaukee Dnve Phase I 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 0 200,000 1,800,000 0 0 2,000,000 N N
36 TR70-99 Mt Angeles Road/Porter Street LID 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 1,800,000 0 0 2,000,000 Y N
37 TR69-99 Rhoads Road Area LID 840,000 0 0 0 0 0 840,000 0 0 840,000 Y N
38 TR97-99 "C" Street and Falrmanl LID 2,300,000 0 0 0 0 230,000 2,070,000 0 0 2,300,000 y N
39 TR71-99 1 Olh/13th and "l"rM" Street LID 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 120,000 1,080,000 0 0 1,200,000 Y N
40 TR36-99 Ennis Street Guardrail 66,000 13,000 0 0 0 0 66,000 0 0 66,000 Y N
41 TR08-99 Milwaukee Drlve Phase II 3,500,000 3,500,000 0 0 0 0 3,500,000 0 0 3,500,000 N N
42 TR14-99 White's Creek Crossing 6,250,000 6,250,000 0 0 0 1,250,000 5,000,000 0 0 6,250,000 N N
STREET PROJECTS & T.I.P.
TOTAL OF MANDATED STREET PROJECTS
TOTAl OF ALL STREET PROJECTS
Page 2
2002.2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECTS
PROJECT TITLE
1 CL82.99 light Warehouse 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 N N
2 ClOl-01 Inslall Slorage Mezzanines 43,000 43,000 43,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 43,000 N N
3 Cl06.99 Inslall Substallon CirCUit SWllches 336,000 336,000 135,000 89,000 92,000 0 0 0 0 316,000 N N
4 Cl02.01 Valley Streel Reconduclor 85,000 85,000 15,000 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 85,000 N N
5 Cl03-0 1 Elwha Underground Rebuild 720,000 720,000 80,000 230,000 140,000 270,000 0 0 0 720,000 tJ N
6 Cl85-99 Fiber Opllcs Backbone 700,000 700,000 100,000 400,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 700,000 N N
7 Cl83-99 Ed,z Hook OH - UG ConverSion 600,000 600,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 350,000 N N
8 ClO 1.02 Upgrade Subslallon Relays 260,000 260,000 0 140,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 0 260,000 N N
9 Cl02-02 College - Golf Course Road 12 kV line 230,000 230,000 0 0 0 30,000 200,000 0 0 230,000 N N
10 Cl07 -99 Airport Industrial Park 762,000 0 0 0 0 372,000 190,000 200,000 0 762,000 N N
11 Cll8-99 Conslruct TransmissIOn line 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 120,000 N N
12 Cl65-99 UGA ElectriC Customers 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 0 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 1,600,000 N N
13 Cl78.99 Light Operallons Cenler 917,000 417,000 0 0 0 915,000 0 0 915,000 N N
14 Cl20-99 Conslruct Golf Course Rd Sub 556,000 556,000 0 0 0 0 74,000 415,000 0 489,000 N N
15 Cl22.99 ElectriC SCADA System 65,000 65,000 0 30,000 35,000 0 0 0 0 65,000 N N
TOTAL OF MANDATED LIGHT FUND PROJECTS I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
TOTAL OF ALL LIGHT FUND PROJECTS 1 7,484,0001 6,222,0001 483,000 I 1,009,000 I 557,0001 2,077,0001 954,0001 1,185,0001 450,0001 6,715,0001
CITY of PORT ANGELES LIGHT PROJECTS
SOLID WASTE
landfill Transfer Slallon
landfill Closure
TOTAL OF MANDATED SOLID WASTE PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL SOLID WASTE PROJECTS
.
-' WT37-99 Waler SCADA 150,000 150,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 N N
WT59.99 Black Diamond Reservoir 900,000 92,000 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 92,000 Y Y
WT01-02 Surge Tank Replacemenl 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 N N
1 WT02.99 Concrele Cylinder Pipe Replacement 2,000,000 2,000,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 2,000,000 N N
2 WT31.99 Peabody SI Reservlor Cover 575,000 215,000 550,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 550,000 Y Y
3 WT12-99 Annual Replacemenls 925,000 925,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 1,085,000 N N
4 WT30.99 Downtown Walermalns/S,dewalks III 2,000,000 500,000 0 100,000 1,900,000 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 Y N
5 WT56-99 Spruce Street Fire Pump 150,000 150,000 50,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 N N
7 WT46-99 New High Zone Southeasl ReservOir 1,800,000 1,020,000 75,000 200,000 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 1,775,000 Y N
8 WT32.99 Corrosion Conlrol FaCility 380,000 380,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N
9 WT57-99 Elwha PS DISinfection 175,000 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 175,000 0 175,000 N N
10 WT64-99 McDougal Subzone Fire pump 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 N N
11 WT02-01 Water Treatment FaCility 10,000,000 0 200,000 200,000 600,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 0 0 10,000,000 N N
12 WT6S.99 UGA Waler Customers 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,0001 400,000 N N
11 WT01.00 Airport Industnal Park Water Line 1,310,000 0 0 0 0 130,000 590,000 590,000 01 1,310,000 Y N 1
TOTAL OF MANDATED WATER PROJECTSI 1,475,0001 307,0001 1,350,000 01 01 01 01 01 01 642,0001
TOTAL OF ALL WATER PROJECTS I 21,015,0001 6,257,0001 2,530,000 1,255,0001 4,655,0001 4,885,0001 5,845,0001 1,020,0001 255,0001 19,737,0001
WATER PROJECTS
.
2002. 2008 CAPITAL .TIES PROJECTS
.'
PROJECT TITLE
WASTEWATER PROJECTS
WW28-99 Backup Generator 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 N N
1 WW27 -99 Annual Replacements lines 840,000 840,000 105,000 110,000 115,000 120,000 125,000 130,000 135,000 840,000 N N
2 WW25-99 Sewer Pump Stabons 1 & 3 Improvements 600,000 600,000 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 N N
3 WW36.99 Compost FacIlity Uparade 1,045,000 1,045,000 173,000 812,000 0 0 0 0 0 985,000 N N
4 WW26.99 1/1 CSO Reducllon 675,000 675,000 100,000 115,000 115,000 120,000 125,000 0 0 575,000 N Y
5 WW01-0l Annexation Interceptor Sewer Main 4,000,000 0 0 500,000 3,500,000 0 0 0 0 4,000,000 Y N
6 WW05-99 Golf Course Road Sewer Interceptor 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 140,000 860,000 0 0 0 1,000,000 N N
7 WW02-00 Airport Industnal Sewer 1,100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 500,000 500,000 0 1,100,000 Y N
8 WW03-00 Lindberg Rd Sewer 1,000,000 0 0 0 100,000 900,000 0 0 0 1,000,000 N N
9 WW04-99 Laurel Street Outfall Extension CSO Reducbon 180,000 180,000 0 0 30,000 150,000 0 0 0 180,000 N Y
10 WW06-99 Oak Streel Outfall Extension eso Reduction 200,000 200,000 0 0 30,000 170,000 0 0 0 200,000 N Y
11 WW02-01 r= ranCIS Street Reservoir 10,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 9,000,000 0 10,000,000 N Y
12 WW01-02 Septage Receiving Stab on 240,000 240,000 0 240,000 0 0 0 0 0 240,000 N N
TOTAL OF MANDATED WASTEWATER PROJECTSI 11,055,0001 1,055,0001 100,000\ 115,000 175,000 440,000 1,125,000 9,000,000 0 10,955,0001
I TOTAL OF ALL WASTEWATER PROJECTSI 20,980,0001 4,880,0001 1,078,000 I 1,777,0001 4,030,000 2,420,000 1,750,000 9,630,000 135,000 20,820,0001
TOTAL MANDATED CL, SW, WT and WW PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL CL, SW, WT and WW PROJECTS
STORMWATER PROJECTS
DR54-99 Crown Park Storm Overflow 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N
~#14 1 DR02-99 City-WIde Catch Basin Modifications 435,000 435,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 90,000 525,000 N N
~ 2 DR14-99 Peabody Creek/Lincoln SI Culvert Rehab 400,000 100,000 0 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 400,000 Y N
3 DR04-99 LIncoln Street Storm Drain (4th to 7th St ) 500,000 500,000 15,000 200,000 285,000 0 0 0 0 500,000 N Y
4 DR53-99 Slonnwaler Discharges Over Bluff 450,000 450,000 0 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 450,000 N N
5 DR65-99 10lh And "N" Streel Regional Storm Detention 300,000 300,000 0 50,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 N N
6 DR03-99 Milwaukee Dr Stormwater Improvements 1,200,000 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 1,200,000 0 0 1,200,000 N N
7 DR01-Ol r=lrst SI. Stonnwater Separabon 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 30,000 220,000 0 0 250,000 N Y
TOTAL ALL MANDATED LITILITY PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL LITILITY PROJECTS
TOTAL OF MANDATED STORMWATER PROJECTS
TOTAL OF ALL STORMWATER PROJECTS
!adsheets/02-07cfp.x1s
Page 4
.
.
.
PROCLAMA TION
Diversity and Civil Rights
WHEREAS, the Port Angeles community was founded upon a base of mutual respect,
understanding, and cooperation between native and immigrant residents of the North
Olympic Peninsula; and
WHEREAS, the City of Port Angeles affirms that the racial and ethnic-cultural diversity of its
community is a source of excellence, enrichment, and strength; and
WHEREAS, the City of Port Angeles has a long history of being a community accepting of all
people, and where non discrimination and diversity is valued as a way oflife through
our social, political, and economic fabric; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to protect, tOe the best of its abilities, civil rights for all people;
and
WHEREAS, the potential of all people can be seriously undermined by discriminatory acts of
prejudice, violence, and hatred, and the City is determined to do everything within
its power and influence to rid itself of such acts.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Glenn Wiggins, Mayor, on behalf of the City Council of Port Angeles,
do hereby proclaim that prejudice, racism, and hatred in all forms will not be tolerated in our
community, and that the City of Port Angeles will pursue justice and resolution to the full extent of
the law.
June 17 2002
Glenn Wiggins, Mayor
11
.
.
.
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
JUNE 17,2002
To:
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT:
Institutional Network Implementation Consulting Services Amendment
Summary: The current consulting services agreement for telecommunications planning with
Metropolitan Communications Consultants (MCC) was completed on May 21,2002 when City
Council adopted the Cable Television Franchise Agreement. Now that planning has been
completed, Staff prepared a scope of work and negotiated an amendment to the professional
services agreement with MCC for institutional network implementation consulting services.
Recommendation: Approve the proposed amendment to the professional services
agreement with Metropolitan Communications Consultants in an amount not to exceed
$45,000 and authorize the Mayor to si2n the amendment.
Background/Analysis: Now that telecommunications planning is complete, implementation
consulting services are needed as part of the I-Net backbone construction project under the cable
television franchise. The proposed services in support ofl-Net backbone construction are lump
sum in an amount not to exceed $25,000 over the next 18 months. At the urging of potential
institutional customers and based on guidance received from the UAC on May 14, 2002, a fast-
track I-Net activation plan has been developed. In support of the I-Net backbone fast-track plan
and schedule, additional implementation consulting services are needed. These services are
proposed based on actual time and material expenses in an amount not to exceed $20,000 over
the next 4 months. Funding for the proposed services is available from electric utility reserves.
On June 11, 2002, the Utility Advisory Committee recommended City Council approve the
proposed amendment to MCC's professional services agreement. The scope of work and a Gantt
chart is included as Attachment A.
On June 11, 2002, the Utility Advisory Committee recommended that MCC be retained during
the remainder of the I-Net implementation project. MCC has a proven track record with the City
and other municipalities and offers high quality professional services. Beyond the City's
planning needs, MCC has the desired qualifications and experience with similar I-Net projects
that have been recently and successfully implemented. Another advantage of retaining MCC is
that they have first-hand knowledge of the project background which would provide continuity
and ultimate time and cost savings to the City. MCC has confirmed that they are available to
complete the proposed scope of work in the required time frame.
Attachment
N :\UAC\Origmal\mcccontractamendmenta. wpd
13
Attachment A
The proposed scope of work and schedule for the Northland I-Net backbone construction project
matches the deadlines specified in the franchise ordinance. A Gantt chart is included as
Attachment A. Tasks IA1-7 related to the Northland I-Net backbone project correspond with the
support required for the City to meet its obligations and deadlines to Northland as specified in
Section 8.6 of Ordinance 3116:
1. Project Management-This item covers project client support and representation, assistance
with status reports and presentations, attendance at public meetings (up to 10 each)
including UAC-and-City Council meetings during the project.
2. I-Net Plans and Specifications Review- This item covers review of Northland plans and
specifications, including conferences and meetings as required, covering the network layout,
optical budgets, I-Net cable plant, node passive termination gear, construction materials,
methods and schedules.
3. Construction Phase Engineering-This item covers construction phase engineering support
to the-City, including shop drawing reviews, consultation regarding field problems, and
verification of payment claims. This item does not include construction field inspection,
which we understand the City will provide using its own forces.
4. Fiber Testing Observation-This item covers field and office work to observe the
Contractor's OTDR testing of the completed fiber installed to verify continuity and
conformity with optical loss budgets. The work will include assistance with test planning
and coordination as required to ensure a proper, timely and efficient test for the benefit of
both Northland and the City.
5. Final Inspection and Recommendation for Acceptance - This item covers one (1)
preliminary and one (1) final inspection conducted in the field, following Contractor's notice
to the City that the work has been completed and that it is ready for final inspection. All
deficiencies discovered at the preliminary inspection will be recorded in a punch list to be
delivered to the Contractor for review and corrective work prior to the final inspection.
Inspections required beyond the final inspection shall be extra work billed separately to the
City and should be deducted from the Contractor's retainage. A final report, including the
Contractor's as-built materials, project photographs, and cost summary shall be prepared as
the basis for an accompanying recoffiI?lendation for acceptance.
6. and 7. UAC and Council Acceptance - This item covers work and attendance at the final
UAC and Council meetings at which time the project will be presented for acceptance by the
City.
Tasks IIA1-5 related to the Northland I-Net backbone fast-track project correspond with the
support required for the City to rapidly activate the network:
1. Project management support - including client representation, assistance with status reports
and presentations, attending meetings and working with potential I-Net users, service
providers, vendors and other affected parties to expedite early activation ofthe l-Net. This
item also includes review assistance with fiber lease and master or other permit, vendor or
provider qualifications, and,advisory services from the time an I-Net sen;ices agreement has
been executed to the date service is delivered, herein scheduled at November 4, 2002.
14
.
.
.
Attachment A - Continuation
2. Development ofI-Net service agreement to be used in negotiations with provider.
3. Assistance during service agreement negotiations.
4. and 5. UAC and Council Acceptance - This item covers work and attendance at the UAC
and Council meetings at which time the service agreement will be presented for acceptance
by the City.
Gantt Chart
2002
2003
2004
Task
Start Finish
I. Northland Backbone Services
~ AM. ~N~rthi~nci B~ckbone" Constructi~n- H H --<" H P " H -- H -- " -- -- "- " -- " -- --" . -- -- -- " - -- -- "
. .. 'Notice to Proceed' u( .. . . . .. . .. ... 6h9io2'"
"-" ~~--"--"-"""""~--
. . . _ .. 1. PrOject M~n~ge.lTlent . ........ . . ... .6/.1 ~(~~. .~!! ~~O~
2 I-~et Plans.~ Sp~cl~c.atlons ~~0~w p. m _ _ ?!?9(~~. 8/29/02
. 3: Construction Ph.as: .E.ngine.e!l~g~ as req'd . _ 8!?0/02 . 2!?5/0~ .
.. .. 4 ~lber.T esting 9b~ervation . . .. . . 2/26/04 3/24/04
5: Flnallnspe~lon ~ ~ecommend Accep!anc~. .,. 3/25/0~ ~/2~!04 . . . .
u._ .6.UA~.Ac.cep~ance ..puP.__.. p 4/1.3!0~u 4/.1?/~4__. .__. __.. .__p.mupp__
. u . 7. .Cou~cil Accep!~nc: __ . . .. . ~/2.0/0~ ,~/20/04
II. Fast Track Services
- - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
A. Fast Track Advisory Services
- . -- -- N~tic-e t~ -P-roc~~i(liA -- - "U -- - -- - - - - --6/19io2 - M..___ -- --
H _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _" _ _ _ H H H H _ _ _ __ " _ _ H _ _ __ H _ _ _ _ H
__ __1. Project M~n~g_e_lTIent SupP?rt __ __. _ _ 6/) ~!02 __. 11 !4!~2.
__' . _ 2: I-Net Se~~e Ag~e~m.ent .oeyeloPrne~t __ __ .__ ~/1.9/0? _ _ 6/?8/~~ _ __
. . 3. .S::'Il~e ~greeme.n! Ne9?!i~t!on . _ _ _ _. . _ .,.. 7!?!~~ _ _ }/??!~~ .
4 UAC Acceptance 7/22/02 7/22/02
. ..:: 5. .C?~~ci( ~~~ep!~n_c~- : ::: : : : : : : : : : : : : - : ',' . :8!~i~~ : :~ ~/~!~~ .
- " - - " "- --.." - - - - - - - _. "- - - ~ - - - "-
. .." _ ~~~~ ~r~~~ ~.d.vi~~ry_ ~e~c~~ C~~~I.e~~~_ _ _ _ _ _ __' _...1.1/~!~2. _ .
" - - " " - - - <- "_. - - " " - - - - -" - - - - - - - ~ --
6/19
6/19
7I:~;1u;-UU~~6i: un
3/2:l
4/13
4/20 . ~ccept
15
.
.
.
16
Presentation Summary
.. Institutional Network Brief Background
" Institutional Network Consulting Services
.. Fast-Track Plan & Schedule
" Fast-Track Consulting Services
" What's Next?
6/17/02
r-' -- -
-f
1
rthl
d Fi
r
a
d 1-
Pump Sta. #7
,( / I :l'-:'
-'
"
,f~/ . ;' . ','-, _,_
'" <' ~:.:: .~ .."/~:1.:
.," 1'../1. ,.j_,'
,f / 1/<, .
. ..
, .....
: ,
. '/.../
...."*-, """,
t
a
j
,
,
I
\
I
,
.
I
i
A
W
N
Washington \
Substation
"'-....
"--"'--, ~
. f---;' I .-./
.
J ---
-'
Corp Y~rd
/ ,,;:.::~ ~ --,-.
t I' ._.!-"
J -." j/L'" -' -:-
N J " -.'
orth Olym. .' 'I I I I l--
pIC library'" t.,;...... .
" . " ..' 'I t
. ! ' 1'-7 1
j
f--- .
~l t
. - " .,,/
. _..
-.. I
,
I'
'" ~~^ ""-H ,,--...._
J
,/"" ""~
:j .::: "
, ,
..... f'" JIII!,,....
-, -$ - I
"
~~.."
"""""
- , ...-
-
~\~..
'" -
I
I
--
--
un_
............----
~~z-~
/'
~~~- ..,..,,~--~~
~\
\1dralQ' Map
I-Net Construction Consulting Services
II Proposed Consulting Services (lump sum)
.,j Cable Operator plans & specifications review
.y Construction phase engineering
.,j Fiber testing observation
.,j Inspection and acceptance
Fast-Track Planning
II Network Activation
.y Short-term lease of Northland dark fiber
.y Preparation and use of I-Net nodes
.y Local service provider activation
.y Network equipment technology
.y Non exclusive rights to preserve competition
for future use of completed I-Net fibers
.,j Interconnection to PUD &/ or other networks
.,j User involvement
II Site Drops
.y Local service provider site drops
.y Open access from I-Net
.y City site drop phasing and priorities
6/17/02
~"~.....
......-...-
fast-Track N
!'._-~..~~
,
,
I'
J:
~
'I
,.
"
,
-- ~-:....::j
,
"
~
est
Interc
nnecti
--...CloooIIlJ~'eo-
April 2004 Pump
Station #7
-<-
-',,9
April 2004
'"
.
Washing
Substati
I
-,
ns
;:"~c".
~,
~
\~...W/
~-"'~
~
~-
Jliba' Oplk Cable
-''-.
PUD In~erconfiectio
PUD Water Interti
# On
i: P .
j,
I, ~
II
..,.......... If
iJ
/
,';
-,,-,.!l
_, <~l
I' ~,
, ,,/
PUD Interconnectiorr
, /'
North OIY!TIpic libr~ry
- ---iJl"~
F
/
I
,
---/"
/1
/'
,(
/ / >-
/)
I~
,
I
,
: -~"""'of<l.
~
L_
I
I
( -
.
;' t.,... S>.... '.
I J} -- o!
\....... "5/
t
..
\'
1
,
, -
"' ,
........
-~-
. ........su..
~ tdoI_SllIlI
OwlterehCIStat\at
-""'lMllIlll
-~"'~l!.1nG
..*.~~Propo.od
--~~iIrIII
"'~"_c-./IttIpoHd
-- OWCE.....
- $IUD i-.g
. ~- o....ll!lidrv
-1oqInlr.~Eo.~
...,_.__...._..."9<1__
":...=:~~~~~..::-
('f- PORT ANGELES
e
Vicinity Map
Fast-Track Action Items
.y Short-term dark fiber lease
.J I-Net node plan review, approval and advance
payment
.J I-Net service agreement
...j User involvement
.J I-Net service provider Master Permit
.J PUD right-of-way license amendment
fast- Track Tentative Schedule
Dark Fiber Lease
Agreement approval 7/2/2002
Plans & Specifications approval 7/30/2002
Construction & interconnection 9/2/2002
Network testing 9/9/2002
I-Net Services Agreement
Agreement development 6/25/2002
Agreement approval 7/16/2002
6/17/02
fast- Track Tentative Schedule
Site Drop Construction
Permit application due 7/23/2002
City approval 7/30/2002
Construction completion 9/9/2002
I-Net Equipment
Equipment installed 9/9/2002
Network testing 9/16/2002
Service Availability 9/24/2002
I-Net Fast Track Consulting Services
B Proposed Consulting Services (time & materials)
..j I-Net services agreement
- development
- negotiation
.; Other services (if needed)
- fiber lease
- master permit
- right-of-way license amendment
- vendor qualifications review
- equipment review
6/17/02
Metropolitan Communicaitons
Consultants
· Proven track record
g Qualifications & experience
· Project background
· Satisfies City franchise requirements
· Available to support fast track
What's Next?
· Tonight
-V Approve proposed amendment
g Future meetings
">/ Lease of Northland dark fiber (7/2/02)
~ I-Net services agreement (by 7/16/02)
6/17/02
.
.
.
CALL TO ORDER-
SPECIAL MEETING:
ROLL CALL:
Capital FacIlities Plan
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
June 4, 2002
Mayor Wiggins called the special meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order at
4:30 p.m.
Members Present:
Mayor Wiggins, Councilmembers Braun, Campbell,
Headrick, Rogers, and Williams.
Members Absent:
Councilmember Erickson
Staff Present:
Manager Quinn, Attorney Knutson, Clerk Upton, B.
Collins, M. Connelly, G. Cutler, D. McKeen, Y.
Ziomkowski, S. McLain, K. Ridout, 1. Harper, T. SmIth,
and G. Kenworthy.
Public Present:
L. Lee, G. & M. Eisenscher, 1. & E. Schmitz, L. Rasmussen,
R. Anderson, A. Holzschuh, P. Lamoureux, T. Pnce, K.
Monds, J. Robinson, A. Mattie, C. Sofie, A. Dueno, W.
Dueno, R. Sofie, N. Karudas, P. Walker, M. WIggms, and
1. Anderson.
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP): Public Works & Utilities Director Cutler made opemng
comments, advising the Council that the City approaches the Capital Facilities Plan at
this particular time of year in order to also address the Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP), which is a requirement precedent to the receipt of State and Federal
funding. Additionally, the CFP dovetails mto the upcoming budget process, as well as
the needs ofthe City and economic development issues. Director Cutler explained the
process used in developing the list of projects presently before the CouncIl, all of WhICh
were prioritized in the form of governmental funds and utility funds. Based on the
funds available, there are governmental fund projects totaling just under $2 Milhon; the
utility projects will be addressed during the budget process. He explamed that the
Council WIll be asked to set a public hearmg for June 17, WIth final adoptIOn of the TIP
/ CFP at the July 2nd meeting.
Manager Quinn asked the Council to consider the CFP's long-term impact on capital
projects and policy decisions. He noted that the most discretionary projects are those
included in the governmental funds, yet they are also the most restricted. Another
conSIderation, as pointed out by Mayor Wiggins, is whether or not the remainmg funds
from 2001 should be committed to capital projects or left in reserve. Manager Quinn
added that the Council may also wish to consider funding requests from the commumty
that come forward from time to time, such as for the public service memorial, the
Francis Street Park, or the children's "Dream Park" at Erickson Field.
Councilman Williams asked for clarification on the organization of the information
provided in the draft CFP, and a thorough explanation from Director Cutler was
forthcoming. Director Cutler continued that the funds required, based on the list
provided, total $2.7 Million. Available funds total $1.9 Million; however, the Council
was reminded that the City expects to receive an msurance reImbursement of
1-7
~i1 ~ \..-VUJ"I..-1L NIb.!:;,! INli
June 4, 2002
CapItal FacihtIes Plan
(Cont'd)
CALL TO ORDER-
REGULAR MEETING:
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE:
PUBLIC CEREMOJ'l.TJES,
PRESENTATIONS AND
PROCLAMATIONS:
Penmsula International
Relations AssociatIOn
FINANCE:
LATE ITEMS TO BE
PLACED ON THIS OR
FUTURE AGENDA:
approxImately $563,000 for the Fire Hall roof. Addrhonally, grant fundmg IS bemg
sought for the CarnegIe Library and, If receIved, that amount should make up the
dIfference to reach the $2.7 MIllion total for the CFP.
The Council then considered the past practIce of commIttIng surplus funds to capIta.
projects. The questIOn was raIsed as to whether the CIty should keep those funds m
reserve In VIew of expected econonuc and budgetary challenges. Mayor WIggms and
Councihnan Campbell emphasIzed the fact that the practice of USIng funds for capItal
projects had been a consclOUS declSlon of the CIty Council at the trme. Fmance DIrector
ZIOmkowskI cautlOned the Council that reserve funds used for operatmg expenses
should only be consIdered If there IS a one-trme expense or If revenue problems are
short term. She dIscouraged the use of reserves to cover general operatIng expenses on
a continuous basis. Funds could be set aside for a future prOject but, in that mstance,
they would be placed m a separate fund so as to not be inadvertently spent. DIrector
ZlOmkowskI then reported on her inItlal revenue projections for the upcommg budget
year, notIng thIS will be a challengmg time for the CIty.
Attention then turned to the projects listed in the CFP, and DIrector Cutler discussed the
pnontIzation of certam projects, such as the 8th Street bridge replacements, the
Lmco1n/Laundsen mtersection, and the Laundsen Boulevard bridge replacement. In
the ensuing discussIOn, Drrector Cutler explained the results of the most recent
mspection of the 8th Street bridges, as well as the fact that the CIty was recently notlfied
that it is the recipIent of$13 Million m grant funds toward a $16 MillIon project. The
CIty'S expense would be $600,000 toward the project. He advised the Council that the
LaurIdsen Boulevard bridge does not rate very hIgh for grant funds by virtue of the fact
the bndge is structurally very sound. If that parhcular bndge IS WIdened for purposes
for rerouting traffic, then the Linco1n/Lauridsen intersection would need to be done at
the same time. DIrector Cutler felt it wise to proceed with the 8th Street bndge
replacements, particularly m view of the substantial grant funds now available.
Following discussion, it was agreed that the Council needed more time to consIder the
elements of the CFP. A special meeting was, therefore, scheduled to be held on
Monday, June 17,2002, at 4:30 p.m. for that purpose.
The special meeting adjourned at 5:55 p.m.
Mayor Wiggms called the regular meetmg of the Port Angeles CIty Council to order at
6:05 p.m.
The Pledge of Al1egiance was led by Clerk Upton.
Mayor WIggms introduced Cmdy Sofie, PresIdent of the Peninsula InternatIOnal
Re1atlons Association (PIRA), to report on the Summer InstItute and present a crane-
making project. Ms. Sofie began by explaming the Mutsu City peace project and asked
the Council for its assIstance in making paper cranes, the international symbol of peace,
which will be presented at the Hiroshima Peace Ceremony. Followmg a demonstratIOn
of origami paper folding, Councihnembers and staff completed a crane for the project
None.
Mayor Wiggins asked for consideration of the agenda for the Council retreat, whIch was
added as Agenda Item J.l. He also added a Multi-Cultural Statement to the agenda as
Item J.2., and the appomtment of members to an Econoll11c Development / Lower
Elwha Tribe Committee as Agenda Item J.3.
18
.
LATE ITEMS TO BE
PLACED ON THIS OR
FUTURE AGENDA:
(Cont'd)
.
.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 4, 2002
Russ Veenema, Chamber of Commerce Director, spoke of the History Weekend and the
progress for the event. He asked for City staff support via the Fire Marshal and the
Building Official in serving on the committee to make the History Weekend goals
happen. This year, the Chamber is planning a two-day event on October 19th and 20th
to be part of the Antique Fair to include both under-ground and above-ground tours,
using the older existing buildings and murals as points of interest. Mr. Veenema then
introduced ArIa Holzschuh, 105 Ih East First Street, who spoke for the Downtown
Association (P ADA) in support of this project and read a portion of the Board's March
1, 2000, minutes dealing with the preservation of downtown sites. She stressed
maintaining and creating an historic community to provide historic tourism.
Jackson Smart, 472 Mt. Pleasant Road, referring to the underground murals he has
discovered over the years, stressed his interest in collecting Port Angeles memorabIha
and the need to preserve this history. He encouraged the City to become involved III
safeguarding its heritage.
June Robinson, 941 East Alder, Sequirn, President of the Historical Society and
Chairman of the County Heritage Advisory Board, urged the City Council to keep the
one remaining section on Laurel Street on the West Side. She mentioned her article in
the History & Culture Magazine of Greater Victoria and the Pacific Northwest, in which
she wrote about the main details of the City's re-grade and asked that, in future
renovation, a portion of sidewalk containing purple glass be saved for the Historical
Society. Appealing to all concerned, Ms. Robinson asked that a portIOn of the
underground be preserved for tourism.
Manager Quinn referenced the CFP and the money set aside for pavers on Laurel Street
and the grant application in place for funding on Phase III for the watermain project.
Should the City receive the grant monies, matching funds are available; should the
funds not be granted, the cost to preserve the area is substantially higher.
Paul Lamoureux, 602 Whidby, expressed his support for the downtown sidewalkJwater-
main project. As a life-long member ofthis community and as one having a great deal
of interest in the City's plans and progress, Mr. Lamoureux still has concerns regarding
the stormwater issues and federal mandates facing the City, the tourism industry, the
service-oriented businesses in relation to the economy, and the citizens of the
community in general. In closing, Mr. Lamoureux wondered why Recycling would not
accept paint cans and wondered about pursuing a second roadway leading out of Port
Angeles to the East.
Peter Ripley, 114 East 6th Street, Publisher and Editor of the Port Angeles Journal,
expressed his full support of the underground project as the City needs to generate more
interest for tourists. He also asked what the City is doing to market a business-friendly
atmosphere, stating that Port Angeles citizens would benefit from economic
development as many members need employment and income. He suggested more
aggressive marketing to bring businesses to the City. Mayor Wiggins stated that thIS
issue is being addressed very efficiently and purposefully by the Chamber of
Commerce.
Vince Cipriano, 815 S. Peabody, as a life-long member of the community, expressed
concern for the loss of historical buildings and houses and stressed the importance of
preserving Port Angeles memorabilia - all done to attract people to the City. A town
without history, he added, is like an empty museum.
Russ Veenema returned to the podium to add that the weekend planned in October can
be considered a trial run to show that the under- and above-ground tours would be a
product which would draw tourism. Port Angeles has many aspects, including the
Discovery Trail, which could be emphasized. He requested that staffbe a part of thIS
1-9
June 4, 2002
LA TE ITEMS TO :BE
PLACED ON THIS OR
FUTURE AGE:NDA:
(Cont'd)
PUBLIC HEARINGS -
OTHER:
Comprehensive Plan
Amendments - CPA 02-01
effort Manager QUlIlD responded that staff would devise procedures and process on
safety Issues Involved In brmgmg people mto the underground areas ThIS would not
be a permanent tour, only a temporary one for the weekend.
Jack Anderson, EnVIronmental Engineermg Manager for Rayomer, was present a, _.c
mVItatIOn ofCouncilmember Rogers. He referred to questIOns and offered clanficatIOn
to questIOns regardmg the trail ThIS Issue IS strongly supported by Rayomer, but a
permanent trail would not be aVallable until a future owner IS IdentIfied. Regardmg the I
temporary trail, progress IS rapId, and the engmeermg plan was recently approved for
the trail's pOSItIOn. Councilmember Rogers then asked Mr Anderson to address the
hazmat issue and whether the contractor would be requrred to be hazmat cemfied My.
Anderson responded that the matenals on the Rayomer SIte are not the type that are
readily absorbed m the skm; the focus IS on keepmg the dust down. The procedure
should be to drlvmg posts m, not diggmg. Soil testing will be done shortly, and If
satIsfactory, cost estrmates would, accordmg to DIrector Cutler, be reduced, he would
proVIde more mformatIon about the cost differentIals after exammmg the Issue.
Manager Quinn indIcated that If the hazmat was a negligIble Issue, more contractors
may be able to bId.
Dan Engelbertson, County Adrmnistrator, 419 Vashon, addressed the 1/10th of 1%
Issue and others regardmgjail and cnmmaljustIce issues. The Law and JustIce CounCIl
IS lookmg for solutIOns to mItIgate the fmanclal losses. In the County, a ballot put to
the CItizens for the 1/10 of 1 % sales tax would be used for maintenance, constructIOn,
and operatIOn of detentIon facilItIes. The Committee IS looking at thIs as a possibilIty,
along with others.
Councilman Campbell commented that because criminal Justice costs are nsmg at an
alarrnmg rate and because revenues are declinmg, the reSIdents of the County would be
mclmed to look favorably on thIS proposal. He added that he, personally, waul"
support thIS action as a way to maintam the current level of criminal Justice activItIe"
Mayor WIggms added that thIS IS one cost that has spiraled out of control in the CIty
budget over the last five years and that any tax mcrease should be looked at carefully.
Police Chief RIepe read his recommendatIon supportIng the County CommiSSIOners
putting the 0.1 % sales tax for jail costs Issue on the ballot, provided that the tax revenue
would be distributed on a County-wide per capIta baSIS. It would mean a $185,000
revenue to the City. Following brief diSCUSSIOn, Councilman Headrick moved to
request the County Commissioners to place the 1I10th of 1 % tax issue on the
ballot. Councilman Braun seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Comprehensive Plan Amendments - CPA 02-01
Community Development Drrector Collins presented an overview of the past and
current activity involving stakeholders in the Harbor and Downtown areas. The eleven
proposals mcluded in the plan have resulted in 13 addItIOnal Land Use Element poliCIes
and obJectIves, 4 addItional TransportatIon Element objectives, 1 addItional
Conservation Element objective, 2 addItIOnal CapItal FacilItIes Element obJectIves, and
3 proposed Land Use Map changes. Director Collins stated that thIs IS a Plan for
project programs and drrections to be undertaken m the next five years, not Just a 20-
year broad plan, and it tries to identIfy commumty priorities for a capital facilities plan
and other publIc and/or private sector resources. What the City hopes to gain from thIs
is a clear direction to where the community wants to go with specific allocation of
resources. The department will be working with the County in future efforts.
Mayor Wiggins opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m.
Jack Anderson returned to the microphone and related that Rayomer fully concurs WIth
20
.
.
.
PUBLIC HEARINGS -
OTHER:
(Cont'd)
Comprehensive Plan
Amendments - CPA 02-01
(Cont'd)
Break
CONSENT AGENDA:
CITY COUNCIL
COMMITTEE
REPORTS:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 4, 2002
the recommendation as relates to the future development ofthe Rayonier site, as it IS in
the best interest of the community, and investors or developers can come in and work
towards the future development of that location.
Aria Holzschuh expressed appreciation to the Planning Commission for the inclusIOn
of PAD A requests in the Plan.
There being no further testimony, Mayor Wiggins closed the public hearing at 7 :45 p.m.
Referencing Page Two of the Comp Plan memo, specifically relating to the
underground tours, Mayor Wiggins expressed concern regarding the wordmg of
Commercial Objective F( 1), specifically the use of "will assist," which could be inferred
to include financial assistance and the expenditure of existing funds. Councilman
Campbell also expressed concern that, in adopting the Plan, the City would be investmg
extra money on the Laurel Street project. Subsequent to a discussion of alternative
language, Mr. Veenema felt the word "assist" should remain, and that "in developing"
could be replaced with "the proposed development" of an underground area. "Will
assist" implies a unified group working for the community. Discussion ensued bnefly,
following which clarifications were made regarding the implications of approvmg a
skating rink with the assumption that it would be located in the downtown area. In
response to a question from Councilman Williams regarding Findmg No.6, DIrector
Collins provided clarification as to the City's intent to provide utilities outsIde the City
limits. Manager Quinn felt this policy will leverage cooperative extensions m the UGA
between the City and the County. Councilman Williams moved to reopen the public
hearing and continue the hearing to June 17, 2002. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Braun and carried unanimously.
Mayor Wiggins recessed the meeting for a break at 8:05 p.m. The meeting reconvened
at 8:20 p.m.
With no discussion forthcoming, Councilman Campbell moved to accept the
Consent Agenda to include: 1) City CouncIl Minutes - May 21, 2002 regular meeting;
2) Check Register - May 24, 2002 - $443,553.84; 3) Electronic Payments - May 24,
2002 - $278,153.00; 4) Final Acceptance for Wastewater Treatment Plant Generator
System; and 5) Surge Tank Replacement Project Final Acceptance. Councilman
Braun seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Councilman Campbell commented on the Conference Center Review Team meeting,
stating that the team is sending a recommendation to the Council which will be on the
agenda for the June 11 th meeting, asking the Council to accept the Ehm Architecture due
diligence response as being substantially complete.
Councilmember Rogers mentioned the stormwater issue and asked that staff e-maIl a
brief explanation of the federal mandate so that she can do an economical impact
analysis for the City's Congressional Delegation.. She also visited the restored
footbridge site on the Waterfront Trail and gave kudos to the Council and stafffor the
progress. On the economic development issue mentioned earlier by Mr. Ripley, Ms.
Rogers assured Mr. Ripley that the committee is working on the issue of jobs coming
to this community. She also attended the Governor's visit to Forks.
Mayor Wiggins attended the Juan de Fuca Festival opening, the Historical Society and
Multi-Cultural meetings, and a meeting with the Elwha Tribe, who, he added, were
pleased to welcome city officials. On June 17th, the Task Force will hear from the
former mayor of Anchorage, Alaska, who will present the Bridge Builders program.
21-
.., u..l.u.... ""t, ~VU.i,.
ORDINANCES NOT
REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
Municipal Annexation
(Contmued from 5/20/02)
Ordinance No. 3117
RESOLUTIONS:
Resoluhon to Set Pubhc
Hearmg Date for CapItal
Facihhes Plan
Resolution No. 3-02
OTHER
CONSIDERATIONS:
Agenda for Council Retreat
Multi-Cultural Statement
Economic Development /
Lower Elwha Tribe
INFORMATION:
Municipal AnnexatIon - Contmued from May 20, 2002
Commumty Development Drrector Collms mdicated that, as a follow-up to the last
meetlng, he further communicated with the County regardmg the proposed annexat
He dIstributed copIes of a letter from the County, indicatmg there IS no concern WIth L:i:._
annexatIOn as proposed. Mayor Wiggms read the Ordmance by tItle, enhtled
ORDINANCE NO. 3] ]7
AN ORDINANCE of the CIty of Port Angeles, Washmgton, annexmg
approximately seventeen acres of property west of the CIty'S
landfill site to the CIty for the purpose of proVIding additIOnal area
for landfill, recreational, or other municipal activihes.
Councilman Braun moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title, and
Councilman Headrick seconded the motion. CounCIlman Williams mqUlred as to
whether the CIty IS allowed to annex its own property, no matter where it may be
located. He enviSIOned the possibihty of annexing the CIty'S property m the Morse
Creek watershed. Discussion ensued, and Attorney Knutson mdicated there are certam
principles that should be applied to the annexation consideration, such as whether the
property IS conhguous to the CIty and WIthin the Urban Growth Area. A vote was
taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
ResolutlOn to Set Publzc Hearing Date for Capital Facilzties Plan
Mayor Wiggms read the Resolution by tItle, entItled
RESOLUTION NO. 3-02
A RESOLUTION of the CIty Council of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, setting a public hearing date for review of the SlX-
year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the Capital
Facilities Plan (CFP) for the years 2003-2008.
Councilman Campbell moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. Councilman
Williams seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
1.
Agenda for Council Retreat
Mayor asked that the Councilmembers proVIde Manager Quinn WIth a list of suggested
items to be placed on the agenda for the upcoming Council retreat. -
2.
Multi-Cultural Statement
Referring to the Statement included in the packet, Mayor Wiggins requested that the
Statement be dIstributed to Councilmembers and that the adoptIon Issue be postponed
until the June ]] th meeting.
3.
Economic Development / Lower Elwha Tribe
Per the request of the Elwha Tribe to have an economic development COillIDlttee
amongst the City with whom Tribal members could meet, it was decided that Mayor
Wiggms and Councilmembers Campbell and Rogers, with Councilman Williams as an
alternate, would comprise the committee.
Manager Quinn mentioned the joint City/County session on June] 1 th at 6 p.m. and that
the agenda- for the meeting will be forthcoming. - The Finance Committee meeting will
22
.
.
.
INFORMATION:
(Cont'd)
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
ADJOURNMENT:
j\
"
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 4, 2002
be rescheduled; the Real Estate Committee meeting is set for June 11 th at 4:00 p,m.; and
Councilman Braun will represent the City at the opening session of the Genealogical
Society meeting.
None.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:47 p.m.
Glenn Wiggins, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
23
.
.
.
24
02/06/11-09:04
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
.
Fnd Opt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
001
70353 Gall's Inc.
70356 Insight Direct Inc.
70374 Quill Corporation
.
70377 Recreation Supply Company
70423 Continental Computer Corp
70429 Drawing Board, The
70438 Faurot (tm)
70485 Reliable Racing Supply Inc
70494 School-Age Notes Inc
70513 WA State Patrol - WASIS
70527 Worldwide Direct
CHECK REGISTER
Date From OS/25/2002 To 06/07/2002
Vendor
Number
07027
09085
17000
18468
03669
04027
06316
18320
19885
23281
23650
Description
Mini medic bags
Data cartridges
Data cartridges
Palm cradle
Folders,tape,dots,notes
Binders,screen wipes
Clasp envelopes
File folders
Wire step files,pens
File folders,markers,clips
Binders,toner cartridge,pens
Binders
Pads, shredder
Photo paper, tab dividers
Hydrofit system
Cemetery Manager
Receipt books
Record cards,spray
Fence posts
Books-Children's program
Criminal history-Gillespie
Criminal history-Ball
Criminal history-Woods
Digital cameras,special kits
0001 70334 AT&T Business Service 01085 05-13 AT&T billing
70337 Albertson's Inc. 01204 Council refreshments
70361 Maybee's Oeli 13036 Business lunches
70384 Verizon Wireless, Bellevue 01105 05-15 Verizon billing
05-15 Verizon billing
70439 Flex-Plan Services Inc. 06158 Monthly processing-May
70443 Harbor Cafe 08216 16 CFP Special Mtg meals
70531 Clallam Co Oept of Health and 03065 Hepatitis shots
0002
70378 Ricoh Business Systems Inc 18425
70427 Oiversified Resource Center 04052
70442 Costco Credit Card Pmts 03261
70462 Metrocall 20000
70477 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062
.
70501 Washington (Auditor), State of 19270
70511 united Parcel Service 21005
Copier supplies
Color copies
Black and white copies
Copy Center svcs-May
CD cases
05-18 Metrocall billing
Diskettes-Emery
Bagels for meeting-Hainstock
Statutory audit svcs-April
Shipping charges-May
25
June 11 2002
GL Code
Number
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2372000
1 2373000
1 2372000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2370000
1 2295000
1 2295000
1 2295000
1 2370000
Total for Department
111 4210
112 3101
111 3101
111 4210
112 4210
111 4150
111 3101
113 4150
Total for Administration
205 4530
205 4530
205 4530
205 4150
201 3101
240 4210
230 3101
240 3101
230 4150
230 4210
Total for Finance
Page
Amount
6.48-
91.97-
230.26-
6.73-
4.96-
3.85-
2.46-
.58-
5.24-
24.35-
22. 12-
4.43-
5.76-
4.38-
120.54-
163.59-
19.15-
11. 50-
14.98-
4.38-
24.00
24.00
24.00
217.22-
892.93-
59.16
29.78
31.05
16.76
16.76
124.20
137.60
27.00
442.31
16.81
976.14
140.15
1,626.68
19.47
25.91
10.79
17.88
24,645.60
14.82
27,494.25
02/06/11-09:04
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
CHECK REGISTER
Date From OS/25/2002 To 06/07/2002
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
Vendor
Number
Description
0003 70374 Quill Corporation 17000 Folders,tape,dots/notes
70418 Clallam Jefferson Public Dfndr 03274 Public Defender fees-June
70456 LexisNexis Matthew Bender 12311 WA Appellate Reports V106
70477 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Notary stamp-Lusby
Postage-_Lusby
70528 Xerox Corporation 24001 DC220SLX Apri l lease
DC22DSLX Apri l lease
0004
70477 Port Angeles City Treasurer
03062
70511 United Parcel Service
70528 Xerox Corporation
21005
24001
0005
70341 Blumenthal Uniforms & Equipmt 02047
70374 Quill Corporation
17000
70393 AT&T Wi reless Services 01404
70404 BratWear 02245
70416 Clallam Co Humane Society 03072
70424 Copy Cat Graphics 03380
70437 Family Medical Center 06323
70438 Faurot (tm) 06316
70462 Metrocall 20000
70474 Peninsula Daily News 16012
70483 Qwest 21001
70489 Ruddell International 18032
70511 United Parcel Service 21005
70512 Verizon Wireless, Bellevue 011 05
70514 WASPC North Sound 23177
70527 Worldwide Direct 23650
70531 Clallam Co Dept of Health and 03065
Office supplies-Roberds
Reimb business meals-Collins
Sheet protectors-Haehnlen
Shipping charges-May
DC420SLX April lease
June 11 2002
GL Code
Number
311 3101
312 4150
311 3101
312 4150
311 4210
312 4530
311 4530
Total for Attorney
411 3101
420 4310
420 3101
411 4210
420 4530
Total for Community Development Dept
Badges
Badges
Colar ornament-Riepe
Emblems
Clasp envelopes
File folders
Wire step files/pens
File folders,markers/clips
Binders
Pads/shredder
Photo paper/tab dividers
05-27 AT&T a/c 49635824
05-14 AT&T a/c 49655020
Jumpsuit/name tag-Viada
Contract pmt-May
Install new graphics
Medical svcs-Welker
Record cards/spray
05-25 Metrocall billing
12 Mo subscription-41014458
05-20 Qwest billing
Thigh holsters
Ammunition
Shipping charges-May
05-15 Verizon billing
Electronic monitoring svcs
Electronic monitoring svcs
Electronic monitoring svcs
Digital cameras,special kits
Methamphetamine reg-Riepe
26
530 3111
530 3111
530 3111
534 3101
534 3101
534 3101
534 3101
534 3101
534 3101
534 3101
530 3101
530 4210
511 4210
530 2080
530 4150
530 4990
512 5099
530 3101
530 4210
511 4901
530 4210
530 3111
530 3101
530 4210
530 4210
512 5099
512 5099
512 5099
530 3180
511 4310
Total for Police
Page
Amot
65 .~
2/750.0
16.9
10.8
12.4
239.0.
102.4'
3/ 197. 1(
101. 74
19.00
8.99
5.41
341. 47
476.61
96.54
276.44
'0
,d
32.43
7.57
69.10
321.23
58.37
75.95
57.69
71.76
45.75
388.43
3/634.33
43.28
106.00
151. 75
194.65
117.00
261.45
68.79
491.65
10.64
430.32
660.00
50.00
900.""
2/86l
55.(JU
11/760.37
02/06/11-09:04
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Fnd Opt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
0006
70329 Lavey, Thomas J
70331 Nielsen, Tony
70335 AT&T Yireless Services
70358 Larry I s'--Jar'ii tor Servi ce
70370 Peninsula Awards & Trophies
70381 Transfac Funding Corporation
70384 Verizon Wireless, Bellevue
70415 Clallam Co EMS/
70426 Curtis & Sons Inc, L. N.
70473 Pen Print Inc
70477 Port Angeles City Treasurer
70528 Xerox Corporation
70529 Ziegler, Kelly G.
CHECK REGISTER
Date From OS/25/2002 To 06/07/2002
Vendor
Number
12343
14120
01404
-'2040
16061
20059
01105
03068
03098
16009
03062
24001
26208
0007
70376 RadioShack Accounts Receivable 18003
70384 Verizon Wireless, Bellevue 01105
70392 AABCO Barricade Company Inc
70393 AT&T Yireless Services
70463 Micro Com Systems Ltd
70477 Port Angeles City Treasurer
70478 Portland Precision Instrument
70510 Thurman Supply
70528 Xerox Corporation
0008
70346 Crown Aquatics Inc
70349 Federal Express Corp.
70360 Matthews International
70375 Qwest
70377 Recreation supply Company
70385 Viking Office Products
70397 All Phase Electric Supply Co
70412 Captain T's
70423 Continental Computer Corp
70426 Curtis & Sons Inc, L. N.
70429 Drawing Board, The
70477 Port Angeles City Treasurer
70485 Reliable Racing Supply Inc
70497 Skagit Gardens Inc
70510 Thurman Supply
01475
01404
13689
03062
16592
20005
24001
03665
06022
13664
21001
18468
22054
01061
03048
03669
03098
04027
03062
18320
19077
20005
Description
Reimb picture framing expense
Teach First Aid class 05-21
05-02 AT&T a/c 47190061
-May janitorial svc
Name tags
Freight chgs
05-15 Verizon billing
05-15 Verizon billing
05-15 Verizon billing
Medic 1 Advisory-June
Glove straps
Glove straps
CPR cards
Sparky week lunches-Yheeler
DC220SS April lease
Reimburse tuition expense
Alkaline batteries
05-15 Verizon billing
05-15 Verizon billing
05-15 Verizon billing
Traffic vests
05-27 AT&T a/c 48966287
Microfilm,jackets
Filing fees-Funston
512K TDS Ram card
Batter i es
DC460SLC April lease
DC214S April lease
Paint,thinner,perma seal
May shipping chgs
Bronze plate-Bollman
05-14 Qwest billing
05-20 Qwest billing
Hydrofit system
Yellow pop-up notes
Civic Field light repairs
Yire
Sweatpants,shirts 12-05-01
Cemetery Manager
Yellow fire hose
Receipt books
Duct tape,photos,folders-Ruud
Fence posts
Landscaping flowers
~~ covers, fasteners
GL Code
Number
641 3101
643 3108
645 4210
684 1+150
641 3111
641 3501
643 4210
641 4210
641 4210
643 4150
643 2080
641 2080
643 3108
642 3101
611 4530
641 4310
711 3101
711 4210
711 4210
711 4210
711 3501
711 4210
711 4150
711 4990
711 4810
711 3101
711 4530
711 4530
June 11 2002
Total for Fire
Total for Public Yorks
862 3120
866 4210
866 3401
863 4210
863 4210
862 3501
811 3101
865 3120
862 3120
862 3101
866 3160
865 3120
862 3101
862 3120
865 3120
865 3140
865 3120
Page 3
Amount
100.00
160.00
10.03
395.00
22.72
52.53
9.92
10.18
2.71
500.00
18.75
37.45
74.66
83.46
197.97
559.18
2,234.56
74.56
9.92
9.92
9.92
130.68
14.37
2,281.47
18.00
144.41
4.10
941.55
71.14
3,710.04
1,859.95
5.25
92.00
41.93
60.50
1,590.54
34.14
82.84
119.78
230.47
2,158.59
264 .71
252.62
38.90
197.58
6,831.89
8.18
02/06/11- 09: 04
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
CHECK REGISTER
Date From OS/25/2002 To 06/07/2002
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
Vendor
Number
Description
70528 Xerox Corporation 24001
70531 Clallam Co Dept of Health and 03065
PVC cement,caps
PVC coup lings
Connectors,conduit,receptacles
PVC water pipe
PVC irrigation fittings
Shower faucet,hose washers
Copper pipe,ells,adapters
Pipe,pipe adapter
Adapter,bushings
Yax ring,washers,goggles
Assorted hardware,caulk
Goggles
Sink repair parts
Tie wrap
Ballasts,edgers,hoses,nozzles
DC220SS April lease
Hepatitis shots
101 0001
70406 Brewer, David
02055
Contract svcs-June
June 11 2002
GL Code
Number
865 3140
865 3140
865 3120
865 3140
865 3140
862 3120
862 3120
865 3120
865 3140
862 3120
862 3120
865 3120
865 3120
865 3120
862 3120
811 4530
862 3107
Total for Parks & Recreation
Total for General Fund
115 4990
Total for Convention Center Fund
102 0007 70371 Port Angeles City Light 16083 Connectors, panel light 752 4810
70376 RadioShack Accounts Receivable 18003 Battery 752 3120
70392 AABCO Barricade Company Inc 01475 Traffic vests 752 3120
Safety T-shirts 752 3120
70397 All Phase Electric Supply Co 01061 Switch, cover box 752 3120
70427 Diversified Resource Center 04052 Janitorial svcs-May 752 4810
70492 Sanderson Safety Supply Co. 19048 Gloves 752 3120
70510 Thurman Supply 20005 Pvc elbow~couplings,cement 752 3120
70511 United Parcel Service 21005 Shipping charges-May 752 4210
Total for Street Fund
103 0001 70477 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Reimburse CNSC meal-Smfth 123 4310
Total for Economic Development
107 0005 70374 Quill Corporation 17000 Binders,screen wipes 532 3101
Binders,toner cartridge,pens 532 3101
70483 Qwest 21001 05-23 Qwest billing 532 4210
70498 Skinner and Associates, Bruce 19880 Strategic Plan-pencom Center 532 4150
Total for PenCom
172 0002 70425 Cozi Homes Construction 03299 Contractor pmt-Malone RPA04L 214 4150
70470 Olympic Community Action Progs 03022 ?df.l fee-Malone RPA04L 214 4150
Page 4,
Amoun'
8.90
6.35
44.07
1.73
18.18
193.40
65.95
55.17
3.06
61.47
71.12
6.16
3.03
82.73
150.57
197.97
105.00
14,944.73
63,.
'4
100.00
100.00
10.54
2.59
261.36
373.25
38.35
77.83
117.78
8.55
17.53
907.78
9.87
9.87
50.75
291.83
60.50
637
1,040.58
5,112.45
452.27
02/06/11-09:04
.
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
174 0008
.
207 0002
208 0002
209 0002
. 0002
211 0002
Vendor
Name
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
June 11 2002
CHECK REGISTER
Date From OS/25/2002 To 06/07/2002
Vendor
Number
70343 Casares, Nicole 03666
70353 Gall's Inc. 07027
70394 Abrams, Gary 01542
70395 Abreu, John 01530
70413 Chapman Jr, Howard 03667
70419 Clarke, Jerry 03670
70420 Clarke, Peter 03671
70421 Class Act 03668
70431 Elwood, Gregg A 05252
70435 Eyestone, Paul 05253
70445 Hert, Richard F 08173
704n Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062
70481 Pryor, Robert C 16588
70486 Renshaw, John 18470
70488 Rooney, Randy L 18462
70494 School-Age Notes Inc 19885
70495 Scott, Brian 198n
70500 Sponberg, Cel i a 19886
70503 Swanson, Dan 19878
70508 Thayer, Jeff 20338
70521 Wedrick, Charlotte 23652
70530 Zufic, Tino 26225
70400 Bank of New York
02175
Description
GL Code
Number
2% Fee-Malone RPA04l
214 4150
Total for PA Housing Rehab Project
Refund Summer programs 854 34760020
Refund Skyhawks camp 851 34760020
Mini medic bags 854 3101
Umpire Salmon Softball Tourney 852 4150
Umpire Adult Slowpitch 851 4150
Umpire Adult Slowpitch League 851 4150
Officiate Soccer League 851 4150
Officiate Soccer League 851 4150
Country Western Dance 06-08 853 4150
Umpire Salmon Softball Tourney 852 4150
Umpire Slowpitch League 851 4150
Officiate Soccer League 851 4150
Umpire Slowpitch Softball 851 4150
Pictures-Cole 850 3101
Umpire Adult Slowpitch League 851 4150
Umpire Salmon Softball Tourney 852 4150
Officiate Soccer League 851 4150
Umpire Slowpitch Softball 851 4150
Umpire Salmon Softball tourney 852 4150
Books-Children's program 854 3101
Umpire Adult Slowpitch League 851 4150
Refund Adult Slowpitch fee 851 34760020
Umpire Adult Slowpitch League 851 4150
Umpire Salmon Softball Tourney 852 4150
Officiate 'D' Division BB 851 4150
Umpire Salmon Softball Tourney 852 4150
Officiate Soccer League 851 4150
Total for Recreational Activities Fund
Admin fee-PORANG92R pe 11-02 296 4150
Total for 1992 GO Bonds(Conv.Cntr/Other)
Admin fee PORANGCLID90 11-02 292 4150
Total for L.I.D. Control Fund
Admin fee-PORANG92 pe 11-02
297 4150
Total for 1992 GO Bonds ( Fire Station
Admin fee PORANGG095 11-02
291 4150
Total for 1995 GO Bonds ( LIbrary)
2dg fee PORUTGOREF01 11-02
298 4150
Page 5
Amount
102.51
5,667.23
615.00
86.00
85.45
36.00
171.00
38.00
125.00
12.50
600.00
114.00
131.00
150.00
359.00
8.29
169.00
133.00
225.00
188.00
228.00
57.78
150.00
25.00
49.00
17.00
20.00
159.50
155.00
4,107.52
96.45
96.45
184.45
184.45
87.20
87.20
152.65
152.65
152.65
02/06/11-09:04
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Fnd Opt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
310 0007
CHECK REGISTER
Date From OS/25/2002 To 06/07/2002
Vendor
Number
70397 All Phase Electric Supply Co 01061
70510 Thurman Supply 20005
70517 Walker Specialty Construction 23627
401
70338 Baierlein, Jeff
70354 Hanson Pipe & Products Inc
70355 Hayter, Tricia
- --7.035.7- -Jacobson,--T.ony-and- Eva-- --
70374 Quill Corporation
70390 Wiggins, Joseph
70391 Willox, Tom
70401 Barker, Becky
70428 Donnellan, Carrie
70454 LC S-J Management
70459 Manson, Megan
70460 McKenzie, Robyn
70461 McNeal, Julie and Ryan
70469 Munro-Huntley, Amy
70479 Pressley, Alisha
70484 Ravenwood, Sunwyn
70496 Siegrist, Karen
70499 Soderlin, Barbara
70516 WESCO Distribution Inc.
70520 Watkins, Joanna
70522 Western States Electric Inc.
70525 Wilson, Gary
70526 Woolett, Stephanie
0009
70342 Business Answerphone Service
70371 Port Angeles City Light
70374 Quill Corporation
70379 Sears Commercial One
70384 Verizon Wireless, Bellevue
70393 AT&T Wireless Services
70397 All Phase Electric Supply Co
02675
08534
08549
10243
17000
23616
23649
02676
04409
10101
13691
13693
13692
13694
16593
18469
19882
19883
23150
23651
23025
23654
23653
02166
16083
17000
19109
01105
01404
01061
Description
June 11 2002
GL Code
Number
Total for 2001 GO Bond Refunding
Lighting parts
Conduit
Release retainage
783 6510
783 6510
783 6510
Total for Capital Improvement Fund
Utility deposit rfd-035408033
Vaul ts
Vaults
Utility deposit rfd-099031048
Utility deposit rfd-037290014
Pens
Utility deposit rfd-005487017
Utility overpmt rfd-001368015
Utility deposit rfd-065846039
Utility deposit rfd-006432010
Utility overpmt rfd-081558052
Utility deposit rfd-057568016
Utility deposit rfd-065803032
Utility deposit rfd-029289006
Utility deposit rfd-124640007
Utility deposit rfd-099295037
Utility deposit rfd-081493044
Utility deposit rfd-043397026
Utility overpmt rfd-043397026
Utility deposit rfd-053171010
Meters
Meters
Anchors
Anchors
Utility deposit rfd-039691013
8tility overpmt rfd-039691013
Washers,bolt eylets
Universal strandlink
Utility deposit rfd-005509016
Utility deposit rfd-029343017
June service
Velcro,paint,bin boxes, rivets
Ant traps,gate card
Star socket
Pens
TV,VCR-Safety and Training
VCR cables
05-15 Verizon billing
05-27 AT&T a/c 48531602
~al'\sts
401 2391200
401 1414000
401 1411000
401 2391200
401 2391200
401 2370000
401 2391200
401 1222200
401 2391200
401 2391200
401 1222200
401 2391200
401 2391200
401 2391200
401 2391200
401 2391200
401 2391200
401 2391200
401 1222200
401 2391200
401 1414000
401 1411000
401 1414000
401 1411000
401 2391200
401 1222200
401 1411000
401 1411000
401 2391200
401 2391200
Total for Department
911 4810
911 3501
911 3120
911 4810
911 3101
911 3120
911' 3120
911 4210
911 4210
911 4810
Page 6
Amoun
152.65
78.38
7.70
527.05
613.13
125.00
4,220.00
358.70
20.08
139.98
1.82-
103.58
14.98
10.50
250.00
33.78
1~ 10
:J
83.20
71.41
88.00
106.61
8.73
63.71
170.57
2,784.00
236.64
183.90
15.63
174.34
50.85
421.98
1,075.60
104.34
43.51
11,098.90
160.00
30.59
16.21
2.27
2'
355., .
15.13
36.61
42.95
534.19
02/06/11-09:04 City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE June 11 2002 Page 7
. CHECK REGISTER
Date From OS/25/2002 To 06/07/2002
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount
Number Name Number Number
Fuseholders.fuses 911 4810 177.63
Light receptacles 911 4810 118.29
Connections.boxes 911 4810 14.48
Strut clamps 911 3403 12.16
Wire 911 3403 125.85
Wire 911 3403 45.20
70408 CED/Consolidated Elec.Dist.lnc 03267 Padlock attachment 911 4810 10.93
70427 Diversified Resource Center 04052 Janitorial svcs-May 911 4810 175.10
70432 Equifax - Credit Information 05160 May service fee 911 4150 32.13
70448 Jaco Analytical Laboratory Inc 10233 Water.oil PCB tests 911 4810 132.00
70482 Public Utility Dist Clallam Co 16038 05-23 billing-Lauridsen Blvd 911 3350 23.19
05-30 billing-2110 Glass Rd 911 3350 71.05
70487 Rohlinger Enterprises Inc. 18087 Linemen's gloves 911 4810 72.53
70492 Sanderson Safety Supply Co. 19048 Litebox 911 3501 309.14
Sensors 911 3120 448.19
70510 Thurman Supply 20005 Light globes 911 3402 9.38
Straps 911 3403 8.12
70511 United Parcel Service 21005 Shipping charges-May 911 4210 22.44
Shipping charges-May 911 4210 10.58
. Shipping charges-May 911 4210 7.58
Shipping charges-May 911 4210 3.37
70522 Western States Electric Inc. 23025 Freight chgs Inv #019771 911 3402 51.04
70528 Xerox Corporation 24001 DC220SS April lease 911 4530 277 . 97
Total for Light 3.376.23
Total for Light Fund 14.475.13
402 70366 Nurnberg Scientific 14092 Dessicant.timers.broth 402 2370000 23.44-
Drierite dessicant 402 2370000 4.70-
Glass ampules-fecal coliform 402 2370000 2.66-
Chlorine reagent pillows 402 2370000 17.99-
Total for Department 48.79-
0007 70334 AT&T Business Service 01085 05-15 AT&T billing 753 4210 30.31
70339 Bainbridge Associates Inc 02671 Compressors. analyzers. sensors 754 3501 10.857.92
70340 Bill's Plumbing Heating Inc. 02041 Sanikan 753 3120 155.00
70349 Federal Express Corp. 06022 May shipping chgs 793 4210 5.25
May shipping chgs 753 4810 12.75
70352 GRCC/WW 07026 Water Treatment W/S-Siebens 753 4310 180.00
Water Treatment W/S-Johnson 753 4310 180.00
Water Treatment W/S-Messinger 753 4310 180.00
70366 Nurnberg Scientific 14092 Dessicant.timers.broth 754 3120 309.24
Drierite dessicant 754 3120 61.95
. Glass ampules-fecal coliform 754 3120 35.06
Chlorine reagent pillows 754 3120 47.50
Chlorine reagent pillows 754 3120 237.39
70375 Qwest 21001 05-23 Qwest billing 753 4210 64.15
70384 Verizon Wireless. Bellevue 01105 05-15 Verizon billing 753 4210 22.90
70387 Washington (DOH). State of 23108 ~e~w project report 793 4150 534.00
02106/11-09:04
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
CHECK REGISTER
Date From OS/25/2002 To 06/07/2002
Fnd Opt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
Vendor
Number
70397 All Phase Electric Supply Co 01061
70400 Bank of New York 02175
70403 Branom Instrument Company 02090
70417 Clallam County 03066
70427 Diversified Resource Center 04052
70436 Familian NW 06020
70440 Fowler Company, H. D. 06110
70446 Hill Materials Inc, Fred b8551
70452 K & L Supply Inc. 11010
70456 LexisNexis Matthew Bender 12311
70471 Pacific Detroit Diesel All ison '16060
70475 Pennino, Mary Grace
16594
70476 Pettit Oil Company 16302
70482 Public Utility Dist Clallam Co 16038
70483 Qwest 21001
70490 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 18216
70502 Steam supply 19290
70510 Thurman supply 20005
70511 United Parcel Service 21005
70512 Verizon Wireless, Bellevue 01105
70518 Washington (Ecology), State of 23197
70523 Whitney Equipment Co. Inc. 23073
704201747 Washington (Ecology), State of 23104
Description
Emergency lights
Admin fee PORANGWAT94 11-02
Admin fee PORANGWAT94R 11-02
Admin fee PORANGWAT98 11-02
Pressure gauge
Water testing
Water testing
Janitorial svcs-May
Water meters,plate strainers
Rebuild Gould pump
Gaskets,bolt and nut kits
MJ Tees
MJ accessory kits
Control density fill
Gloves
WA Defending DUI 2E Issue #3
Trsfr switch-diesel generator
Kohler Diesel Generator
Credit for wait time
Teach writing seminar
Teach writing seminar
Oil
05-23 Crown Z Water Rd
05-20 Qwest billing
05-20 Qwest billing
05-20 Qwest billing
05-20 Qwest billing
05-20 Qwest billing
05-20 Qwest billing
05-23 Qwest billing
05-23 Qwest billing
05-23 Qwest billing
05-20 Qwest billing
Credit zip cutter
PVC parts
Pump motor,assembly
ASCO valves
Adapters, reducers
Adapter
PVC adapters,tubing,conduit
Sheet metal screws
Shipping charges-May
05-15 Verizon billing
05-15 Verizon billing
2001 Hazardous Waste fee
Safety hatch
Rotameter scale,ball
Loan pmt SRF91001 pd by EFT
32
GL Code
Number
754 3120
754 4150
754 4150
754 4150
754 3120
753 4810
754 4810
753 4810
753 3402
754 3501
,
753 3402
753 3402
753 3402
753 3402
754 3120
754 3120
754 6510
754 6510
754 6510
753 4310
754 4310
753 3402
753 4710
754 4210
754 4210
754 4210
754 4210
754 4210
754 4210
754 4210
754 4210
754 4210
754 4210
793 6510
753 3402
753 3402
753 3402
754 3120
754 3120
754 3120
754 3501
754 4210
754 4210
754 4210
753 4990
754 4810
753 3402
754 8100
June 11 2002
Total for Public Works
Page 8
..')
Amount
90.49
88.95
87.65
153.55
129.79
462.00
288.00
n.83
2,743.75
1,297.69
3,112.82
139.73
175.n
454.44
186.03
74.38
14,607.00
89,438.12
342.73-
205.00
\)
I
c.~.d2
16.74
57.42
57.42
57.42
57.42
57.42
57.42
57.42
57.42
57.42
40.75
218.95-
81.24
635.86
827.31
7.69
3.57
19.02
12.94
5.41
16.70
12.21
46.00
72~
15./
129,808.05
259,384.08
02/06/11-09:04
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
.
Fnd Opt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
404
70362 McMaster-Carr Supply Co.
70366 Nurnberg Scientific
CHECK REGISTER
Date From OS/25/2002 To 06/07/2002
Vendor
Number
13202
14092
0007 70334 AT&T Business Service 01085
70362 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 13202
70397 All Phase Electric Supply Co 01061
70427 Diversified Resource Center 04052
70453 L & S Tire Company 12396
70455 Landscapes Northwest 12178
70472 Parametrix Inc. 16155
.
70475
70492
70506
Pennino, Mary Grace
Sanderson Safety Supply Co.
TaylorSparks Refrigeration Inc
421 0009
70344 Clallam Co Housing Authority
70348 Everwarm Hearth & Home Inc
70351 Ford, Clara
70359 Levenetz, Ingrid
70372 Potter, Dennis
70380 St Amand, Tom
70396 Adam, Philip L
70407 C & F Insulation
70430 Dutrow, Jamie
70434 Everwarm Hearth & Home Inc
70447 Hutchinson, Martha
70466 Miller, Glen and Lea
70524 Williams, Larry G
501
70362 McMaster-Carr Supply Co.
70369 Parts Incorporated
70476 Pettit Oil Company
.
16594
19048
20290
03305
05013
R0385
R0386
R0387
R0388
R0389
03102
R0390
05013
R0391
R0392
R0393
13202
18126
16302
Description
June 11 2002
GL Code
Number
Total for Water/Wastewater Fund
Swivel casters
Chlorine reagent pillows
05-06 AT&T billing
Swivel casters
Receptacles,plugs,struts
Beam cl amps
Janitorial svcs-May
Recycle tires
LF landscaping plants
LF Engineering 2001 pe 04-26
LF Engineering 2001 pe 04-26
LF Engineering-2002 pe 04-26
LF Engineering-2002 pe 04-26
LF Engineering-2002 pe 04-26
LF Engineering-2002 pe 04-26
Teach writing seminar
Bunker boots
Remove compressors, refrigerant
City rebate program
City rebate program-Gustafson
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program-Dickinson
City rebate program
City rebate program-Graves
City rebate program
City rebate program
City rebate program
Alloy steel space cloth
Impulse relay
Gasoline
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
33
404 2370000
404 2370000
Total for Department
755 4210
755 4810
755 3120
755 3120
755 4810
755 4810
755 4810
755 4150
795 4150
755 4150
795 4150
795 4150
795 4150
755 4310
755 3120
755 4810
Total for Public Works
Total for Solid Waste Fund
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
913 4986
Total for Conservation Fund
501 2370000
501 2370000
501 1412000
501 1412000
501 1412000
501 1412000
Page 9
Amount
259,335.29
15.59-
3.60-
19.19-
18.92
205 . 71
115.44
34.62
194.54
750.00
1,691.90
1 ,932.18
123.94
6,586.35
5,098.04
3,717.02
123.94
205.00
93.08
584.28
21,474.96
21,455.77
50.00
480.00
150.00
150.00
25.00
150.00
175 .00
2,417.40
50.00
320.00
42.19
150.00
25.00
4,184.59
35.20-
7.99-
3,335.80
3,044.60
281.83
1,673.47
02/06/11-09:04
City of Port AngeLes - LIVE MACHINE
Fnd Opt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
0007 70362 McMaster-Carr SuppLy Co. 13202
70363 Motor T rucks I nc. 13128
70364 N C Machinery Co. 14001
70369 Parts Incorporated 18126
70388 Washington (DOL), State of 23218
7J389 Western Equipment Distrib. Inc 23019
70427 Diversified Resource Center 04052
70467 MobiLe Equipment Systems 13119
70475 Pennino, Mary Grace 16594
70476 Pettit OiL Company 16302
CHECK REGISTER
Date From OS/25/2002 To 06/07/2002
Vendor
Number
Description
ALLoy steel space cloth
Alloy steel space cloth
Coolant sending unit
Valve A
Impulse relay
Underground Storage Tanks
Bearings,ignition switch
Damper lever assembly,switch
Janitorial svcs-May
Hot shift
Hot shift
Credit hot shift
Teach writing seminar
EQ5 May gasoline
EQ11 May diesel
EQ9 May gasol ine
EQ12 May gasoline
EQ15 May gasoline
EQ18 May gasoline
EQ27 May gasoline
EQ28 May gasoline
EQ29 May gasoline
EQ30 May gasoline
EQ40 May gasoline
EQ41 May gasoline
EQ42 May gasoline
EQ43 May gasoline
EQ44 May gasoline
EQ45 May gasoline
EQ46 May gasoline
EQ47 May gasoline
EQ48 May gasoline
EC53 May gasoline
EC54 May gasoline
EQ65 May gasoline
EC66 May gasoline
EC70 May gasoline
EQ73 May gasoline
EQ78 May gasoline
EC80 May gasoline
EC81 May gasoline
EQ82 May gasoline
EC83 May gasoline
EC84 May gasoline
EC85 May gasoline
EQ86 May gasoline
EQ87 May gasoline
EQ88 May gasoline
~~MaY gasoline
GL Code
Number
June 11 2002
Total for Department
760 3402
760 3402
760 3402
760 3402
760 3402
760 4950
760 3402
760 3402
760 4810
760 3402
760 3402
760 3402
760 4310
760 3210
760 3211
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
Page 10
.
Amount
8,292.51
232.20
232.19
21.26
51.32
105.37
209.00
276.22
146.38
116.70
1,170.06
1,441.10
1,158.18-
205.00
48.59
51.27
31.83
13.27
57.61
.
32.85
138.43
81.19
60.90
23.99
107.21
54.59
73.01
16.39
132.69
109.28
39.52
60.71
23.78
26.51
158.11
260.58
75.81
78.21
52.72
84.74
98.46
105.50
~.
116.86
92.45
82.62
02/06/11-09:04
Fnd Opt Check
Number
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
Vendor
Name
70477 Port Angeles City Treasurer
70493 Schetky Northwest Sales Inc
70507 Territorial Supplies Inc.
70511 United Parcel Service
70515 WCIA
502 0002
70356 Insight Direct Inc.
70384 verizon Wireless, Bellevue
70442 Costco Credit Card Pmts
70327 Evergreen Collision Center-PA
70328 Hiener, Rudy
70330 Miller Trust Account, Craig L
70332 Sperr, Stephen
70333 Young, Jeff
70336 AWC Employee Benefit Trust
503 0001
70345 Clallam Co YMCA
70365
70398
70399
70402
70409
70411
70422
70441
70444
70449
70450
70451
NW Admin Transfer Acct
Bailey, Jim
Balser, Fred
Bishop, Virgil
Cameron, Kenneth
Camporini, Richard
Cleland, Mike
Grooms, Michael E
Healthcare Mgt Administrators
Johnson, Donald G
Johnson, Harry
Jorissen, Robert R
CHECK REGISTER
Date From OS/25/2002 To 06/07/2002
Vendor
Number
03062
19884
20001
21005
23204
09085
01105
03261
05126
08550
13690
19610
25129
01231
03076
14169
02567
02243
02019
03252
03273
03263
07187
08492
10052
10047
10013
Description
EQ90 May gasoline
EQ95 May gasoline
EQ96 May gasoline
EQ138 May gasoline
EQ148 May gasoline
EQ151 May gasoline
Transfer fees-Burrett
2002 Eldorado Aerotech Van
Siren,speaker
Shipping charges-May
Shipping charges-May
Shipping charges-May
UST Li abil ity
June 11 2002
GL Code
Number
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 3210
760 4950
760 6410
760 3402
760 4210
760 4210
760 4210
760 4901
Total for Public Works
Total for Equipment Services Fund
Data cartridges
Data cartridges
Palm cradle
05-15 Verizon billing
Memory chips
250 3101
250 4810
250 4810
250 4210
250 4810
Total for Information Technology Fund
Damage claim #02-11
Claim settlement #02-19
Claim settlement #17-00
Reimburse medical expenses
Reimburse medical expense
June premium
June premium
June premium
Membership-Hainstock 013156801
Membership-Oliver 01-2122501
Non-sworn June premium
Sworn officers-June premium
Retirees June premium
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Disability board claims-May'
Reimb Medicare prem-May,June
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Disability board claims-May
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Monthly premium-June
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Reimb Medicare premium-June
":ietc: Medicare premium-June
119 4999
119 4999
119 4999
121 4630
121 4630
121 4630
121 4632
121 4634
121 4150
121 4150
121 4633
121 4633
121 4634
121 4635
121 4635
121 4635
121 4635
121 4635
121 4635
121 4635
121 4635
117 4601
121 4635
121 4635
121 4635
Page 11
Amoun
43.81
31.49
67.78
112.35
13.59
26.95
18.75
63,454.97
352.04
22.37
22.37
15.06
730.00
70,588.04
78,880.55
1,213.47
3,038.26
88.73
17.21
1 , 189.98
5,547.65
591.92
375.00
42,500.00
375.00
166.69
83,154.46
1,312.64
5,583.65
399.00
399.00
13,801.70
17,545.20
7,872.30
50.00
45.50
94.00
46.00
110.00
50.00
558.51
54.00
1,711.20
50.00
54.00
54.00
02/06/11-09:04
City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE
CHECK REGISTER
Date From OS/25/2002 To 06/07/2002
Fnd Opt Check Vendor Vendor
Number Name Number
70457 Lindley, James K. 12019
70458 Loucks, Jasper 12186
70464 Miesel, Phil 13261
70465 Mike Walling/Rainier EAP 18057
70468 Morgan, Roy 13145
70480 Preston Gates & Ell is LLP 16175
70504 Sweatt, Johnnie 19146
70509 Thompson, Bruce 20083
70519 Washington (PERS), State of 23638
731224511 Healthcare Mgt Administrators 08492
736232110 Healthcare Mgt Administrators 08492
740237266 Healthcare Mgt Administrators 08492
602 0002 70336 AWC Employee Benefit Trust 01231
70405 Braun, Gary 02173
70410 Campbell, Malcolm 0 03045
70433 Evans, Sidney 05103
70491 Ryan, Ed 18034
652 0008
70375 Qwest
70510 Thurman Supply
698
70347 Employees Association
70350 Flex-Plan Services (Payroll)
70367 Office of Support Enforcement
70368 Office of Support Enforcement
70373 Professional Collection
70382 US Department of Education
70383 United Way (payroll)
70386 Volunteer Fire Association
70476 Pettit Oil Company
21001
20005
05041
06062
15072
15166
16490
21075
21028
22060
16302
Description
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Disability board claims-May
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Reimb Medicare premium-June
EAP Svcs-May
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Professional svcs pe 04-30
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Pagemaker 6.5 -White #5309
05-21 Weekly claims pd by EFT
05-28 Weekly claims pd EFT
05-31 claims paid by EFT
June 11 2002
GL Code
Number
121 4635
121 4635
121 4635
121 4635
121 4150
121 4635
119 4150
121 4635
121 4635
118 4992
117 4601
117 4601
117 4601
Total for Self - Insurance Fund
June premium
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Reimb Medicare premium-June
Reimb Medicare premium-June
225 4635
225 4635
225 4635
225 4635
225 4635
Total for Firemen's Pension Fund
05-14 Qwest billing
05-23 Qwest billing
Halogen lights
Halogen lights
868 4210
868 4210
868 3120
868 3120
Total for Esther Webster Trust Fund
Payroll deductions pe 05-29
Payroll deductions pe 05-29
Payroll deductions pe 05-29
Payroll deductions pe 05-29
Payroll deductions pe 05-29
Payroll deductions pe 05-29
Payroll deductions pe 05-29
Payroll deductions pe 05-29
EQ76 May gasoline
698 2315210
698 2315210
698 2315210
698 2315210
698 2315210
698 2315210
698 2315240
698 2315210
698 9999999
Total for Accounts Payable Clearing Fund
36
Grand Total
Page
'1
!
Amo!
54.0
18.1
85.01
46.11
330.01
54.0C
6,296.22
65.70
50.00
135.00
4,878.57
5,549.30
2,282.40
196,798.16
2,274.75
54.00
54.00
'. ,50
JO
2,482.25
57.47
60.50
57.84
121.03
296.84
372.00
950.96
1,194.22
169.85
350.34
69.41
419.56
44.00
16.48
3,586.82
663,529.60
.
.
.
Fund
401 05-28-02
501 06-04-02
207 06-04-02
Finance Department
Electronic Payments May 25, 2002 - June 07, 2002
BPA WPPSS April Power Purchase
Bank of New Yark Debt Service
Bank of New Yark Debt Service
Total
C:\ WINNT\Profiles\Administrator\Personal\ Wires. wpd
37
120,557.00
14,288.77
15.15250
149,998.27
.
.
.
38
.
MEMO
FINANCE
DEPARTMENT
Yvonne Ziomkowski
Finance Director
[4601]
Karen Asquith
Accountmg Mgr.
[4605]
A Carol Hagar
~strative Assistant
[4600]
.
FORT,ANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
Date: June 12,2002
To: Mayor Wiggins and City Council
From: Lynne Bryant, Accounting Technician
Re: Payroll Information for June 09, 2002
For June 9th, 2002, the payroll was $460,753.41. Overall the year-to-date
increase from 2001 to 2002 is 5.80%. There was a slight change in the General
Fund. There are no significant changes from last pay period.
· There appear to be no significant changes to highlight with this payroll
report.
Suggestions and comments are welcome.
39
PAYROLL INFORMATION AS OF JUNE 09, 2002
Current 2001 2002 2001 YTD
Fund/Department for PP # 12 for PP # 12 TOTAL TOTAL VARIANCE
06/09/02 06/10/01 YTD YTD $ %
General Fund
Mayor/Council 14,791.07 14,250.00 541.07 3.80%
City Manager (Adm,HR,Clerk) 12,473.13 11,883.07 149,282.93 143,643.94 5,638.99 3.93%
Superior Performance/OPS 308.40 699.30 6,401.29 6,883.88 (482.59) -7.01%
Finance 31,105.75 29,891.74 383,428.61 358,967.26 24,461.35 6.81%
City Attorney 9,313.34 9,061.21 117,178.46 115,534.61 1,643.85 1.42%
Community Development 9,986.77 9,241.51 110,527.86 110,331.01 196.85 0.18%
Police Department 84,343.42 68,797.09 915,711.51 848,491.08 67,220.43 7.92%
Fire Department 55,778.09 49,899.75 651,799.75 617,937.81 33,861.94 5.48%
Public Works and Utility Services 30,093.10 32,909.96 358,776.48 368,810.41 (10,033.93) -2.72%
Park and Recreation 46,006.27 44,833.21 484,773.95 492,345.87 (7,571.92) -1.54%
Facility Maintenance 2,977.32 2,505.99 37,528.64 32,297.66 5,230.98 16.20%
Total General Fund 282,385.59 259,722.87 3,230,200.55 3,109,493.53 120,707.02 3.88%
Economic Development 2,529.37 2,452.08 30,354.70 29,371.71 982.99 3.35%
Pen Com 28,329.07 25,927.00 340,627.07 320,257.88 20,369.19 6.36%
Street 17,150.67 15,923.51 200,747.83 186,090.04 14,657.79 7.88%
Recreation Activities 2,614.78 2,384.80 27,562.31 26,517.08 1,045.23 3.94%
Electric Utility Fund 49,627.52 43,961.64 583,246.07 515,440.56 67,805.51 13.15%
Water 20,221.49 18,489.29 243,486.58 224,903.56 18,583.02 P ~1.
,0
Wastewater 14,364.65 13,527.08 171,520.16 163,009.19 8,510.97 l- 70
....
Solid Waste 25,104.16 23,664.76 305,674.53 272,113.50 33,561.03 12.33%
Equipment Services 8,864.15 8,731.37 106,339.64 102,644.75 3,694.89 3.60%
Information Technology 6,663.12 6,402.57 79,756.39 76,455.60 3,300.79 4.32%
Firemen's Pension 7,860.72 8,573.48 (712.76) -8.31 %
Esther Webster Trust 2,898.84 2,758.88 34,736.65 33,267.92 1,468.73 4.41%
Total Payroll 460,753.41 423,945.81 5,362,113.20 5,068,138.80 293,974.40 5.80%
40
.
.
.
~ORrANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
June 17, 2002
To:
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities Aft..L'
FROM:
RE:
A ward Contracts for:
Compo sting Control and Aeration System Equipment (Project No. 22-12) and
Port Angeles Landfill Co-composting Facility Improvements (Project No. 22-14) ,
and Re-allocate Funds
Summary: Part of the Landfill Closure Long Range Plan is to upgrade and operate the co-
composting facility. The Six Year Capital Facilities Plan projected expenditures of$146,000 for
2002. Due to changes from the original plan this cost has risen by $28,000 to $174,000. These
changes, designed to maximize the use of the existing building, will lower costs projected for
2003 and give additional time to plan future improvements. The plan also included purchasing a
dedicated front end loader for the compo sting operations.
Recommendation: Award the contracts for the Composting Control and Aeration System
Equipment, Project No. 22-12, to Engineered Compost Systems, Inc. in the amount of
$75,334.00; and Port Angeles Landfill Co-composting Facility Improvements, Project No.
22-14, to Glacier Environmental Services, Inc. in the amount of $56,916.45. Also, direct the
Finance Director to reallocate funds for the Co-Compost Facility Project to permit
awarding the two construction contracts and procurement of a front-end loader during the
2002 bud~et year.
Background/Analysis: Part of the Landfill Closure Long Range Plan is to upgrade and operate
the co-compo sting facility. In mid to late 2006 when the Landfill closes it will be necessary to
dispose of yard waste in a cost effective manner. The known alternatives are to either long haul
yard waste or compost it. It is not known how much longer land application ofbiosolids will be
permitted. Selecting composting will permit disposal ofbiosolids and yard waste in a cost
effective manner. It is envisioned that the compost will be made available to the Parks and
Recreation Department, other Departments, and residents of the City at a nominal cost.
Federal and state regulations require that biosolids from waste water treatment plants (WWTP)
be beneficially used. For the past two seasons biosolids have been land applied to fields in
Clallam County. Prior to this, composting was accomplished at a facility at the Landfill.
41
Compost Facility Memo.
City Council June 17, 2002
Page2
This facility was designed and constructed in 1994/1995 in part with a Centennial Grant from the
Department of Ecology. For a short period of time between composting and land application, the
biosolids were placed in the Landfill cell. The Department of Ecology has been concerned that
by not compo sting the City has not complied with the grant. Compost was used for daily cover
at the Landfill because staff could not consistently make an exceptional quality Class 'A'
product. Composting is a labor intensive operation and ceased in January 1998 due to lack of
manpower. Problems that were identified at that time were: inadequate staffing, lack of dedicated
equipment, ineffective facility configuration~- and insufficient paved area for material storage.
A decision was made in 2001 to restart composting in 2002 on a limited basis with the ultimate
goal of 100% compo~ting operations within one to two years. The two major projects, along with
miscellaneous wprk and. equipment to be installed by staff, were budgeted and planned for
accomplishment as Phase I in 2002 under the capital facilities project WW36-99. The first
project, Composting Control and Aeration System Equipment, is to computerize and modify the
aeration mechanical system; and the second project, Co-Composting Facility Improvements, is to
install an underslab aeration piping system in the compost facility. This project will reduce the
labor effort and improve the efficiency of the composting process. The overall projected funding
for Phase I is in the budget at $146,000. The total cost is now at approximately $175,000. The
following table recaps the costs for Phase 1.
Improvement Original Cost Decrease/
Budget Increase
WW36-99* Composting Control and $44,735 $75,334 $30,599
Aeration System Equipment, Project
No. 22-12
WW36-99* Port Angeles Landfill $44,124 $56,916 $12,792
Co-composting Facility
Improvements, Project No. 22-14
WW36-99* Miscellaneous $57,141 $42,220 ($14,921)
Components
Subtotal $146,000 $174,470 $28,470
Loader with attachments $130,000 $95,000 ($35,000)
Totals $276,000 $269,470 ($6,530)
42
Compost Facihty Memo
City Council June 17,2002
Page3
The Composting Control and Aeration System Equipment Contract, Project No. 22-12, by the
low bidder, Engineered Compost Systems, is higher than anticipated due to a change in the
equipment initially envisioned. The change will enable larger volumes of material to be
composted in the same number of bays in the existing building, permitting better utilization of
space. The specific changes include larger blowers and variable frequency drive to
acconunodate longer lengths-ofunderslab-piping. The specified equipment will result in overall
lower project costs by reducing the future storage building needed for the feedstock material.
The Port Angeles Landfill Co-composting Facility Improvements contract, Proj ect No. 22-14, by
the low bidder, Glacier Environmental, is also higher than estimated for the same reason. This
project installs the underslab aeration piping. The lengths were changed from 30 feet to 50 feet.
Also, upon review by our engineering consultant, Parametrix, it was determined that larger
sections of the slab needed to be removed to preserve the structural integrity of the facility and a
drainage collection system needed to be included for leachate.
The other component of starting the composting operation is procurement of a front-end loader
with bucket attachments. The estimated costs were projected at $130,000. The revised costs
have been reduced to $95,000 due to a weak heavy equipment market. Reallocation of funds will
permit the projects to proceed without utilizing funds from the reserve.
The bid results for the Composting Control and Aeration System Equipment Contract, Project
No. 22-12 follow:
Contractor
City
Bid Results
(lncludin Tax)
$75,334.00
$62,165.00
Engineered Compost Systems
Estimate
Seattle
The bid results for the Port Angeles Landfill Co-composting Facility Improvements contract,
Project No. 22-14 are below. Bids were solicited from six qualified contractors, three responded.
Contractor
City
Bid Results
(lncludin Tax)
$56,916.45
$57,594.86
$85,694.40
$44,124.00
Glacier Environmental Services
Mukilteo
Crescent Development Inc.
Hoch Construction Inc.
Joyce
Port Angeles
Estimate
43
Compost Facility Memo
City Council June 17,2002
Page4
The bid results for the front end loader are currently under review due to a bid protest. Upon
resolution of the protest a recommendation will be brought to Council for consideration.
It is envisioned that compost operations will commence this fall after the construction projects
are complete and the equipment is received..
It is recommended that Council award the contracts for the Composting Control and Aeration
System Equipment, Project No. 22-12, to Engineered Compost Systems and Port Angeles
Landfill Co-composting Facility Improvements, Project No. 22-14, to Glacier Environmental
Services. Also, the Finance Director should be directed to reallocate funds for the Co-Compost
Facility Project to permit awarding the two construction contracts and procurement of a front-end
loader during the 2002 budget year.
N:\CoCompostCCmemo617 _ A:wpd
44
.
.
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~ORrANGEtES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
June 17, 2002
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities t>L-v
,
Final Acceptance for Contract with S&B for Installation of SCADA Equipment
(Phase II), Project No. 21-22
Summary: S&B Inc. has completed all work associated with the project. The project has been
inspected and accepted as complete. Final payment has been processed.
Background / Analysis: Phase II of the SCADA (Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition)
System, which includes expansion to Jones and E Street Reservoirs and the Elwha Emergency
Valve, has been completed. Due to the engineering services aspect of the contract, there was no
requirement to hold a retainage.
The contract was executed with S&B Inc. for $47,402.42. One change order was issued in
December 2001, for $2,540.54 to install 500 feet of telephone wire to the Elwha Emergency
Valve site along Milwaukee Drive. The work was completed on February 28,2002. All work
has been inspected and accepted. The staff is pleased with the performance of the expansion and
operation of the SCADA system. The following table summarizes the cost breakdown, including
tax.
Original Contract Change Orders Unit Quantity Final Cost Project Cost
Amount (1) Variations Variance
$47,402.42 $2,540.54 $0.00 $49,942.96 5.4%
N.\PROJECTS\21-22 SCADA Phase 2\CloseoutCC_A.wpd
45
.
.
.
46
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~ORT.ANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
June 17, 2002
MA YOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
Marc Connelly, Director of Parks and Recreation
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works & Utilities
Award the Contract for Rayonier Mill Trail Improvements, Project No. 22-17
Summary: Bids were requested for the Rayonier Mill Trail Improvements, Project No. 22-17.
Three bids were received and opened on June 12,2002. Horizon Excavating submitted the
lowest responsive bid in the amount of$62,077.90. The engineer's estimate for this project was
$76,444.26.
Recommendation: Award the contract for the Rayonier Mill Trail Improvements, Project
No. 22-17, to Horizon Excavating in the total bid amount of $62,077.90 and authorize the
Mayor to si2n the contract.
.
Back2round / Analysis:
This project will construct a trail through the Rayonier Mill Site. The improvements will include
grading and placement of chain link fencing and a gravel trail.
Funding for the project was authorized by the Council on May 7,2002 in the amount of $80,000.
The design was completed by staff. Bids were solicited from contractors on the Small Works
Roster. Bids were opened on June 12,2002. The following results have been corrected as
required.
FIRM CITY BID
Horizon Excavating Port Angeles, W A $62,077.90
Bayview Excavating, Inc. Sequim, WA $76,005.40
D. Holcomb & Co. Port Angeles, W A $88,906.02
Estimate $76,444.26
Horizon Excavating, Inc., submitted the lowest responsive bid. Their bid is appropriate
considering the engineer's estimate. Review of their experience and references demonstrate that
. they are a responsible bidder and qualified to perform this work.
The project bidding assistance and construction management is being provided by staff. Work is
anticipated to start shortly after the 4th of July and to be completed in early August 2002.
N.\PROJECTS\22-17 Rayonier Trail\Estirnate & Bid TabS\CCawa4 ;']z.WPd
.
.
.
48
.
.
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
June 17,2002
MA YOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
REAL ESTATE COMMITTEE AND
DENNIS C. DICKSON, SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY and
PROPERTY MANAGER
AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT WITH PUGET
SOUND PILOTS
Su mmary: Following the terrorist attack on the United States on September 11, 2001, the United
States Coast Guard, Port Angeles extended the security buffer zone outside the entry gate to its base
located on Ediz Hook. As a result of the extension of the buffer zone, it was necessary to relocate
the parking and storage area leased by Puget Sound Pilots from the City of Port Angeles. A
proposed lease amendment has been drafted which provides for the relocation of the parking and
storage areas, an increase in the lease amount, a four year extension of the term of the lease, and
recovery of rip-rap nourishment costs
Recommendation: The Real Estate Committee recommends authorizing the Mayor to sign the
proposed lease amendment between the City of Port Angeles and Puget Sound Pilots.
Background I Analysis:
On January 1, 1995 the City of Port Angeles entered into a lease with the Puget Sound Pilots
for an area abutting the United States Coast Guard Base on Ediz Hook. The area leased by Puget
Sound Pilots was used for parking, storage of its refuse containers, and also included an area for a
drain field. Following the terrorist attack of September 11,2001, the United States Coast Guard
extended the security buffer zone along the fence and entry gate into the base on Ediz Hook. Since
the extension ofthe buffer zone included the area previously leased by the Pilots, it was necessary
to relocate their parking and storage area. The proposed lease amendment provides for relocation
ofthat parking and storage area and deletes the area where the drain field had been located since the
drain field is no longer maintained as a result ofthe installation ofthe sanitary sewer. The proposed
lease amendment also provides for return to the original leased area in the event that the Coast Guard
discontinues use of the expanded buffer zone.
49
The proposed lease amendment further provides for an extension of the lease term which
previously had provided that it would expire in 2009 to a new termination date of June 3, 2013
which date corresponds to the expiration ofthe underlying lease. The proposed amendment further
provides that the Pilots would have the option to renew this lease for an additional eight year term
beyond that date, should the City renew the underlying lease with the United States of America.
Additionally, the proposed lease amendment increases the annual rental to $300 annually plus
leasehold excise tax and provides for yearly rental increase in accordance with the CPI.
Finally, the proposed lease amendment provides for reimbursement by the Pilots to the City
for its proportionate share of rip-rap nourishment costs. Currently the Corps of Engineers performs
nourishment services approximately every five (5) years, billing the City for a portion of those costs.
This provision allows the City to recover a proportionate share of those costs from its lessees.
I~~
Dennis C. ickson
Senior Assistant City Attorney
DCD/tlp
G \APPSIDISTCRTlREAL ESTATE COMMITTEE\PUGET PILOTS\LeaseAmendmentuscg wpd
50
.
.
.
First Amendment to Lease Agreement
Between
City of Port Angeles
and
Puget Sound Pilots
This is the first amendment to the lease agreement dated January I, 1995 ("Lease") by and
between the City of Port Angeles ("City'') and Puget Sound Pilots ("Pilots");
WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Lease to modify the Lease to extend the term of
the Lease, modify the legal description of the properties leased and to provide for periodic
reimbursement of costs associated with rip rap nourishment,
WHEREFORE, the parties in consideration ofthe mutual covenants contained herein, hereby
agree as follows:
1. The provisions describing the legal description shall be replaced with the following language:
Legal description per attached Exhibit "C" and map per attached Exhibit "D",
2.
The provisions in Section 2 ofthe Lease shall be replaced with the following language:
This Lease which commenced on the first day of January, 1995, will terminate at
midnight June 3, 2013, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the terms hereof.
Subj ect to all ofthe conditions, restrictions, provisions and renewal ofthe underlying
lease from the United States of America to the City of Port Angeles dated August 17, 1914,
and all conditions, provisions, and restriction of any succeeding leases, the Pilots shall have
the option to renew this lease for an additional term of eight (8) years.
3.
The language in Section 6 of the Lease shall be modified as follows:
The Pilots agree to pay the City during the term of this Lease the annual sum of
$300.00 plus Department of Revenue leasehold tax (taxes currently 12.84%) as minimum
rent, payable in advance on the 15th day of January of each year; provided, however, that the
minimum rent set forth shall be increased yearly to reflect the increase, if any, in the cost of
living as indicated by the Consumer Price Index for Puget Sound or regional index as
published by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics (the "Index"). Any
adjustment of minium rent shall become effective immediately. lfthe Index is discontinued
the City shall substitute a similar index of consumer prices.
In addition to the annual rental, Pilots shall reimburse the City for its proportionate
share of rip rap nourishment costs assessed by the Corp of Engineers. Pilots proportionate
share shall be determined by dividing the length of Pilots' leasehold (150 feet) by the total
linear lease footage (10,800 feet) which equals .0138; times the amount assessed to the City.
The rip rap nourishment is performed approximately every five (5) years. Said amount shall
become due and payable upon billing by the City.
51
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument as signed and
dated below:
City of Port Angeles
By:
Its:
Date:
LESSEE:
Puget Sound Pilots
By:
Its:
Date:
G \APPS\DISTCRT\REAL ESTATE COMMITTEE\PUGET PILOTS\lslAmendmenLwpd
52
.
.
.
LESSOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF
)
) ss.
)
)
COUNTY OF
On this day of , 2002, before me a Notary Public in and for the State of
, personally appeared , personally
known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who executed this
instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the
of the City of Port Angeles, to be the free and voluntary act and
deed of said party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above
wri tten.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
residmg at
My appointment expires
Print Name
LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF
)
) ss.
)
)
County of
On this day of , 2002, before me a Notary Public in and for the State of
___________________________, personally appeared _________________ and
known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the
person and respectively, ofthe Puget Sound
Pilots, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument
to the free and voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes therein
mentIOned, and on oath stated that they were authonzed to execute said instrument, and that the seal affixed
is the seal of said municipal corporation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above
written.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
residing at
My appointment expires
Print Name
53
LEASE:
Puget Sound Pilots
Ediz Hook, Port Angeles Townsite, Washington
EXHIBIT "C"
All those portions of the following described Ediz Hook Lease Lot 8 and Outlot 7:
LEASE LOT 8 AND OUTLOT 7: Those portions lying southerly of Ediz Hook Road and
extending 185 feet westerly of the present location of the United States Coast Guard Base
westerly preimeter fencing necessary for equipment, vehicle parking and refuse containers.
ALSO: All that portion of the tidelands lying southerly of the above described Lease Lot 8 and
Outlot 7 necessary for maintenance and repair of facilities together with space for three overflow
parking spaces in Lease Lot 8 and Outlot 7 northerly ofEdiz Hook Road.
RESERVING UNTO THE GRANTOR: an easement and right of entry upon the property to
repair, construct, reinstall and otherwise maintain existing utilities and roadway.
G-\APPSIDISTCRTlREAL ESTATE COMMITTEE\PUGET PILOTS\exhlblt c wpd
54
(I ) ),.;/- -
Q ~i j' t(~~~1-
~ ~ ~?i0 .,.l-
-..'.l- I~':J....
." f '''?-~.,f I 'I(
~ ~ ..(....'1. ~
" I ")< (Q _J
~ , ,,"'< "i 0. -
'~ J A" ~ '-.j_....J __
'.: l/"'f"'ot,, J
f) /~ /" ~c;
,J) I c? t 'IS ~
\...._//~/ <:17' '\
\)/ ..,,, -.-
....../~
,-.I ~',. 1,./
""""' ". ')
II)
oLL
v
o
""
"0
C
~
~
l1:l
..J
i~
C>
<:.
m
q) C
~ ~
j ~
~ ill
~ (.')
'* ~ en
I . c
:.i
...
(Q
Q.
(Q
...
'1'
o
"
0.
....
1/'1
~
Ie 0.
~ 12
g" ~n
~ l
tti .1;
a.. S
r)
u
t- ~ ~,
,---{z
t " ;;~
?~ if' "1
S~ I J
",", ~. I
..' ./
'-:.. 7. ()
: I
o
("J
<.,
- I"
'''1
'"
....
C
...
'"
t-
-
m
' ~, \
-
:t
X "I
W
j ~
j ,l;~"".
" "',
'.~. .
~f. 1" )v"" l
',j.,~ " . ") ~i , '1
" . .;~., ,,:It
"'""'.......~_ ,_ .....~~~,_ ~ .<IWI'
I
.
rlr~ :
.
.
.
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
June 17, 2002
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
Brad Collins, Community Development Director ~
Mantooth Annexation Request
Summary: James and Roberta Mantooth own approximately 30 acres of property east of the
end of Lindberg Road. The property is contiguous with the eastern City limit in this area. They
are requesting annexation to the City, and state law now requires that the City Council determine
whether to proceed with the annexation following the election method. The County Auditor has
been contacted regarding the cost of such an election, and it appears that a simple mail-in ballot
during the September primary election may be done at little cost. At this time the City Council
must discuss the annexation request with the petitioners and determine the ballot issues.
Recommendation: The Department of Community Development recommends that the City
Council approve the request to annex and schedule an election ballot for the September 2002
rim election including a measure re uiring as sum tion of the Ci 's bonded indebtedness.
Background / Analysis:
The Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan policies support annexation of properties contiguous
to the City limits and inside the Urban Growth Area (UGA). The subject property lies west of Ennis
Creek and includes a portion of the Ennis Creek Ravine, which naturally defines the City's urban
service area. The City and County zoning in the area is low density residential and not an issue in
the annexation. For small contiguous annexations, the City has required assumption of existing
bonded indebtedness upon annexation. Under an election method, which the City has not used in
many years if ever, the annexation ballot requires a separate measure for approval of assumption of
bonded indebtedness from the annexation measure itself. If the annexation measure is passed by a
majority vote (Le., 50% + 1) and the assumption of bonded indebtedness is not passed, the City
Council can decide whether to still accept the annexation or not.
Staff will be available to answer questions.
Attachments: Annexation Request
Municipal Research & Service Center Report on Annexation Methods
55
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
REQUEST TO CIRCULATE AN ANNEXATION PETITION
APPLICANT(s): J&-w..es E f 1?ot~r+~ -r M~"""-+oo+4
ADDRESS:
zz -gt' ~-f j(~c/'ey
(!b~) Lf.-S-7 - S'4/t:J
I?d
Daytime Phone:
Location of area proposed for annexation, including legal description and street
address (if available): A (fro X--. 30 A I e 4..Sf 0 F Pe t1. {'L-, 5"t.L( a....
6.(~ (.~yse i~ P.r+ A "J,-fes. -n..,,/ ",f., c<Lrrwty Z ~.,.,.,.~,'Ie.
~\\.~ o"e. If i~ r;J-l- +~e crt; b~rL-:-/A-y~ef_. no{!. ex.-t-/r-e- frDf5!rl-r (5 CdVU>&/
~ ~ "- Chnre.n/fJ--+(''n! e~fe..-......u.+) v.)L.L~ I, ""'li-~ "e.LC,) ~ o--ef 0 ~ +~ p Y'9fl t41
-b. ()- +,,-f6..{ (l.f 3.. E"'t-o;j Cree~ t""'^\.\~ 6.Jb~ +k.e- easf ec}je. t:J-F-Itr.e..
~ to p.e- r-hi '
I.!egal d~cription of appIicant(s') property within proposed annexation area:
5p~ /I .+-.f.u:jtl'f i6-)( )I-L-+~~"'-+-
Assessed valuation of property within proposed area: $ '324-) I Sr ~ 1L<cc.t-J.,
> -+--0
Assessed valuation of applicant(s') property within annexation area: $3Z~ lief )st:;:~
Names of streets within and adjacent to area proposed' for annexation:
Streets within: N'OVli'
Adjacent streets: Li"{l,e~ 12.,..J d...k,J5 d t.rJer: n+ f COf-a, '
Size of propos~exation area: ~ ?o ~
Signature(s):~ r: A,,'::J~ Date:
~~..k~~~~
~-3--oz-
f- y -Z)v~
56
Brad Collins - R~:
al Research News - Summer 2002
" ~ -
Pa e
.
If the annexation is approved by the voters, the city council must adopt an
ordinance providing for the annexation and also, if appropriate, for
adoption of the proposed zoning ordinance and for the assumption of
indebtedness. The annexation is effective on the date set out in the
annexation ordinance. The city must comply with certain notice requirements,
both to the state and to the county, concerning the change in city
boundaries. The timing of these notices can have an effect on when the city
begins receiving tax revenues from the annexed area.
As noted above, there are two other methods of annexation - the
unincorporated island and municipal purpose methods - that are available in
limited circumstances. The unincorporated island method is available when
there is territory that has at least 80 percent of its boundaries contiguous
to the city. The territory must be less than 100 acres, or it can be of any
size if the area existed before June 30, 1994, if it is in the same county
and urban growth area, and the city was planning at that time under the
Growth Management Act (GMA). Under this method, the city council passes a
resolution to annex the territory, it holds a public hearing, and then it
adopts an ordinance providing for the annexation. The ordinance may also
provide for assumption of indebtedness and adoption of a proposed zoning
regulation. The ordinance is subject to a 45-day referendum period, during
which a petition signed by 10 percent of the number of voters who voted in
the last general election may be filed. If a sufficient referendum petition
is filed and the issue goes to an election, the annexation is approved, or
defeated, by a simple majority vote.
.
The municipal purpose method may be used in code cities when the territory
is owned by the city and in non-code cities when the territory is either
owned by the city or when all the property owners consent, and, for all
cities, where the area is to be used for a "municipal purpose," such as a
park, watershed, jail, etc. The property need not be contiguous to the city,
although it must be within an urban growth area if the city is in a GMA
county. The process is a simple one, requiring only a majority vote of the
council.
Given the limitations of all three of these annexation methods, we hope the
2003 legislature will adopt a new, improved, petition method of annexation
that the state supreme court will accept as beingconstitutional. By creating
the petition method of annexation in 1945, the legislature provided a needed
alternative to the election method. As Justice Madsen notes In her dissent
to the court's decision invalidating the petition method, "a municipality is
severely handicapped by the election method, and without an alternative
method would be 'unable to deal with the people living just outside the
city, enjoying its advantages without having to pay for them [quoting from
an Arizona court decision]. III But, until the legislature acts, if it ever
does, cities will have to depend primarily upon the election method as the
means of adding territory.
By Bob Meinig
Legal Consultant
Municipal Research & Services Center
.
IndexWeb Site Index
57
! Brad Collins '- Re: mrscnews] Munici al Research News - Summer 2002
Pa l
The state supreme court recently determined that the petition method of
annexation to cities is unconstitutional. Since the petition method has
been, by far, the most commonly used method of annexation, its legal demise
has left many cities with annexation plans scratching their heads, so to
speak. The court's decision has also resulted in many inquiries to MRSC
asking about other methods of annexation, particularly the election method.
So, we thought it might be helpful to provide a general overview of how
cities may annex unincorporated territory, sans the petition method. A
detailed overview of annexation procedures can be found in our Annexation
Handbook, at htto:/Iwww.mrsc.oro/textah.htm <htto:/Iwww.mrsc oro/textah.htm>
.
Until there is a legislative fix, the basic method of annexation left to
cities is the election method. The two other methods - the unincorporated
island and the municipal purpose methods - can be used only in limited
circumstances, and they will be discussed only briefly at the end of this
artIcle. Unfortunately, the election method has some basic drawbacks.
I
Though it may sound odd to say this, one drawback of the election method is
that you need voters to have an annexation election. But, this fact presents
a roadblock to annexing property on which no voters live - vacant,
undeveloped property or property that is devoted to nonresidential
(commercial or industrial) uses. Annexation elections are conducted only in
the area proposed for annexation. Voters who already live in the city do not
get to vote in an annexation election, and, of course, neither do
nonresident owners of property in the proposed annexation area. The ironic
result of the state supreme court's decision invalidating the petition
method because it grants owners of highly-valued property an
unconstitutional privilege is that property owners, regardless of the value
of their property, now have no voice regarding annexation unless they live
and vote in the area proposed for annexation. So, cities and owners of such
property have been thinking of ways around this roadblock, such as moving
people onto the property or adding to the proposed annexation area property
that already has resident voters and who, presumably, would favor
annexation. Without such maneuvers, it is now impossible to annex vacant and
nonresidential property, unless one of the other two methods of annexation
applies, which is usually not the case.
.
Another basic drawback of the election method is cost. Elections cost money,
and cities are responsible for the entire cost of annexation elections,
regardless of the outcome. How much a particular annexation election will
cost a city depends on a number of variables, such as how many other
jurisdictions have measures being voted on at the same election, how many
voters are in those jurisdictions, and how many measures are being voted on.
Mail balloting is generally cheaper than conducting an election at polling
places, though that method is not available if the measure is being voted on
at a primary (September) or general election (November). While it would
appear to be more economical for cities to annex larger areas in one
election, there is the risk that the voters will reject annexation and
cities will get nothing in return for the money they spend. And, these days
cities don't have much, if any, funds to put at risk.
So, if a city gets past the issues of having voters on the property and of
cost, how does it annex territory by the election method? An annexation
using the election method can be initiated in either of two ways. It may be
.
58
l~!:.~~~2!1I6I~Ji~lfr!f~~n~~~~~i&!f~~iES~F~~~iilli!l~J2qQ?~
.
.
.
"=~: :=-=.~.=~= = =:::~___--==Pag-~
initiated by city council resolution. Or, it can be started by a petition
signed by voters in the area proposed for annexation. That petition must
contain signatures of at least 10 percent (code cities) or 20 percent (other
cities and towns) of the number who voted in the last state general
election. An annexation proposed by petition must receive council approval
before it may proceed to an election. Both the petition and the resolution
must contain certain information, including the boundaries of the proposed
annexation area and the number of voters in the area, and certain
statements, such as asking for an election on the question of annexation. As
in a petition method annexation, the proposed annexation can be linked with
a proposed zoning regulation, and the ballot can also include a proposition
regarding assumption of city indebtedness. An election method annexation may
also ask the voters whether they want to establish a community municipal
corporation, which has approval authority over zoning ordinances and
comprehensive plan amendments that affect the annexed area.
Election method annexations are subject to review by the boundary review
board or, in counties without such a board, are reviewed by either a county
annexation review board (code cities) or an "ad hoc" annexation review
board. Being "subject" to boundary review board review does not mean that a
boundary review board will actually review a proposed annexation. It may not
do so unless its jurisdiction is invoked by an affected local government,
such as a county or a fire protection district, or by property owner or
voter petition. If board jurisdiction is not invoked, the annexation is
deemed approved by the board. An annexation of less than 50 acres or of less
than $2 million in assessed value is exempt from review, except in counties
with a boundary review board.
Review board approval is necessary for the proposed annexation to proceed to
an election, unless the annexation is exempt from board review. In non-code
city annexations, the board of county commissioners must, after review board
approval, hold a hearing on the proposed annexation to determine if the
petition "complies with the requirements of law." Presumably, this hearing
before the county commissioners is merely a formality.
The next step is for the city council to choose the election date. It does
so by indicating its preference to the county auditor, and that preference
must be for one of the statutory speCial election dates (in February, March,
April, May, September, or November) that is more than 60 days after the
cityindicates its preference. The county auditor is required to call for an
election to be held on the date indicated by the city.
A simple majority vote is all that is needed to approve an annexation
proposal. If the issue of assumption of indebtedness is included as a
separate proposition, that proposition must be approved by 60 percent of the
voters, with a minimum turnout of not less than 40 percent of those who
voted at the last general election. If the annexation is approved by a
majority of the voters but the indebtedness proposition is not approved, the
city council may refuse to annex the property. If the indebtedness
proposition is combined with the annexation proposition, the combined
measure must also be approved by 60 percent of the voters with a minimum
number of votes not less than 40 percent of those from the last general
election. However, if the combined proposition receives only a simple
majority vote, the city council may accept the annexation without the
assumption of indebtedness. A proposition to create a community municipal
corporation is approved by a simple majority vote.
59
.
.
.
60
, j
I
, ,
i
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
.
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT DECISION
Brad Collins
Scott K. Johns, Associate Plann,A
March 19, 2002
RE:
OWNER:
PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT DECISION - Petersen
2004 through 2018 W. 16th
Same
PROPOSAL: Replat the parcel described as; The North ~ of Sub Lot 105, except the west 228 feet,
Townsite of Port Angeles, into four residential Lots.
DECISION: The preliminary short plat is hereby approved with the conditions, rmdings, and
conclusions shown as Attachment A to this report.
ANALYSIS: , "
The applicant has requested the short plat of approximately 108,585' square feet of
, property into four new buDding sites. The new lot will each be 27,146.25 square-feet in area, 85.5
feet by 317.5 feet, and front on 16th Street. Although the property is zoned RMD, it is proposed for
single family development like RS-9 which has a 75 foot minimum lot width. Dedication of35 feet
for the western half of Evans Street would leave more than 75 feet of lot width for the 4 lots.
The properties are zoned RMD, Residential Medium Density. The site is currently
undeveloped and forested with mature second growth Douglas-fir, cedar and Alder trees with a
typical understory of salal, ferns, seafoam, and elderberry plants. There is a natural drainage/swale
on the southern portion of the subject site and angling northeast to a delineated wetland east of the
extension of Evans Street.
The surrounding areas to the south, east and west are zoned Residential Medium
Density and the area to the north is zoned Residential TraDer Park. The areas to the south and
east are currently undeveloped. The areas to the north and west are developed primarily with
single family uses.
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS:
" The Public Works and Utilities Department noted that the applicant must dedicate 3S feet for
right-of-way on 16th Street fronting the north side of the parcel. The south one half plus 10 feet
of the Sixteenth Street dedicated right-of-way must be improved with curb, gutter and paving.
A connection to the sanitary sewer at 15th and Owen will require engineering. The 6" water main
/
I
I
/
I
,<.
Prelimmary Short Plat - SHP 02-02
Petersen
March 19,2002
Page 2
,
.
must be extended along 16th to Evans A venue where a fire hydrant must be installed. Electrical
primary power line must be extended from the 15/16 alley on Evans A venue to the site. The work
will require a Clearing and Grading Permit. Further discussion identified the need for the
dedication of35 feet for the right-of-way on Evans Street. A no-protest LID agreement in lieu of
improvements to Evans Street would be acceptable to the City at this time.
.-
The Fire Det)artment has no objections but noted that all single family residences within a new
subdivision outside of the four minute response time shall be equipped with a residential sprinkler
system that is installed and maintained in accordance with the Uniform fire Code.
State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A): Short subdivisions are specifically exempt from
SEPA under RCW 197-11-800(6)(a) for lands not covered by water. This action satisfies the
City's response under the State's Environmental Policy Act.
/
Ill/
/
Preliminary Short Plat - SHP 02-02
Petersen
March 19,2002
Page 3
.
ATTACHMENT A
Conditions, Findings, and Conclusions for Preliminary Approval of SHP 02- 02
Conditions:
1. The final plat shall be entitled '.SHP 02-02".
2. The final plat shall identify the addresses of the four new lots as; 2018 W. 16th (Lot 1),
2014 W. 16th (Lot 2), 2010 W. 16th (Lot 3) and 2004 W. 16th Street. 411
3. Sewer, water, and power connections will be per Public Works and Utilities Department
requirements and shall include:
<
A. Dedicate 35 feet along 16th Street frontage of the entire 342 foot north side of the
parcel for right-of-way.
B. Newly dedicated Sixteenth Street right-of-way must be improved with curb, gutter
and paving of the south Y2 plus 10 feet.
C. Connection to the sanitary sewer at 15th and Owen. (Will require engineered design)
D. Extend the 6" water main along 16th to Evans Avenue and install a fire hydrant, per
Fire Department specifications.
E. Extend primary electrical power line from the 15/16 alley on Evans Avenue, per
Public Works and Utilities Specifications.
F. Dedicate 35 feet along the Evans Street frontage of the entire 317.5 foot east side
of the parcel for right-of-way.
G. A no-protest Local Improvement District agreement for future street and utility
improvements in Evans Street may be accepted by the City in lieu of required
street improvements at this time.
4. A Clearing and Grading Permit review will be required.
5. Building footprints must be shown on the final Plat.
6. A wetland Delineation shall be done for the subject site. No structure or earth disturbing
activity may occur within 50 feet of the delineated wetland located near the east side of the
subject site. An Environmentally Sensitive Area review will be required for subsequent
clearing or development on the property containing a wetland or wetland buffer.
7. Stormwater drainage issues will be addressed during the building permit process.
Findings:
1. A preliminary short plat was submitted by Steve and Madonna Petersen proposing to
reorganize 108,585 square feet of property into four new lots. The preliminary short plat
application was submitted on February 15,2002.
2. The subject property is identified as the north Y2 of Sub Lot 105, except the west 228 feet,
Townsite of Port Angeles. The property is zoned RMD, Residential Medium Density.
1/
I
;'
I
.
.
Preliminary Short Plat - SHP 02-02
Petersen
March 19, 2002
Page 4
3. The RMD, Residential Medium Density zone requires a minimum of 7,000 square feet of
area per lot. The new lots will each have 27,146.25 square feet in area.
4. Section 16.04.100 PAMC and 58.17.110(2) RCW require the Director of Community
Development to detennine that appropriate provisions for public health, safety and general
welfare, open spaces, drainage ways, streets, roads, alleys and other public ways, transit
stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools,
and all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure
safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from schools have been considered
in the proposal.
5. Neither 16th,/ Evans, or Owens Streets are either an arterial or a school walking route.
6. A 3.2 acre wetland is located on the parcel located immediately adjacent to the subject site
on the east and extends onto the subject parcel. The wetland is identified as Wetland # 3
in the City of Port Angeles Wetland Inventory, prepared be Sheldon and Associates on
May 10, 1995. A fifty foot buffer is required along the margins of the wetland.
7. A natural swale drainage is located on the souther portion of the si te and connected to the
delineated wetland east of the site.
8. Comments from the Port Angeles Public Works and Utilities and Fire Departments have
been considered in this decision and addressed in the conditions of preliminary approval
9. )'he proposal has been reviewed with respect to the goals and policies of the City's
Comprehensive Plan and ,Land Use Map. The Plan requires concurrency for streets, water
service, sanitary sewer service and electrical servIce (Capital Facilities Element), and
compliance with Land Use Policy A.l and A.2 and Land Use Map, Land Use Policy E.3 ,
Transportation Policy A.2 and A.3, and Conservation Goal B and Policies Bl, 2, 5,6, 7,
,8 10, 14, 16, and 19.
10. Section 16.04.130 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code provides that the applicant/or
property owner shall submit a final short plat to the Planning Department within five (5)
years of preliminary approval that is in compliance with the approved preliminary short
plat. Failure to submit a proposed revised final short plat within the five (5) years shall
terminate the preliminary short plat approval.
11. Prior to fmal short plat approval, the property must be surveyed and monumented in
accordance with Section 16.04.160 PAMC by a registered land surveyor. A title report
and information required by Section 16.04.160 PAMC shall be furnished with the fmal
plat.
12. All current and delinquent taxes and assessments must be paid to the County Treasurer
prior to final short plat approval.
:/
/
I
.;
/
.
PreliminllJ}' Short Plat - SHP 02-02
Petersen
March 19,2002
Page 5
Conclusions :
A. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan,
Port Angeles Municipal Code, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17
RCW.
B. Approval of the proposed short plat provides for the public health, safety and general
welfare of the community and serves the public use and interest.
C. As conditioned, City services and facilities are available and will be improved to City
Urban Service Ordinance standards.
D. The proposed short plat will result in the creatio~ of 4 new residential building sites that
meet the area and dimensional criteria of the RMD zone.
E. Evans Street right-of-way is needed to serve either medium density residential development
in the area or further subdivision of the subject large lots.
F. Improvements to Evans Street frontage is not needed at this time to serve either
development of the existing site as a four lot subdivision with each lot fronting and having
access to 16th Street or to serve existing development on surrounding properties or in the
vicinity. .
G.
The large lots may be developed at RS-9 standards and replatted with frontage and access
to Evans Street.
..~~
Brad ollins, Director
Community Development Division
ttjY/D2-
" ,
Date
\/,"Cj~ : ~.;"':::>\ .<.. l.AJ In_:k_ S
\
f'
&~
Sections:
13.61.010
13.61.020
13.61.030
13.61.040
13.61.050
13.61.060
13.61.070
13.61.080
13.61.090
13.61.100
13.61.110
13.61.120
13.61.130
13.61.140
13.61.150
13.61.160
13.61.170
13.61.180
13.61.190
13.61.200
13.61.210
13.61.220
13.61.230
13.61.010
13.61.030
Chapter 13.61
GENERAL PROVISIONS - PENALTIES
~
Purpose.
Applicability.
Inspection.
Unlawful Acts Defined.
Discontinuance of Sewer Service.
Administration.
Sewer Required.
Connection Made by Authorized Representatives.
Private Wastewater Disposal System Required - When.
Permit Required
Permit Application and Issuance.
Permit Duration.
Temporary Permit.
Performance of Permitted Work.
Stop Work Authority.
Permit Fee.
Inoperative or Inadequate Sewer Service.
Compliance With Industrial Pretreatment in Chapter 13.06 P AMC Required.
Grease and Oil Traps Required.
Emergency Call-Outs.
Criminal Penalty.
Civil Remedy.
Administrative Procedures.
13.61.010 P1ll])ose. The purpose of this Chapter is"Je ,establish fees for service by, and
general rules ana regulations for the service and extension ot'service from, the sewer and storm
systems ofthe City of Port Angeles, and to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare
of the users of the sewer system, in accordance with standards established by the City, County, State
and Federal governments. (Ord. 2394 Ch. n ~1, 6/2/86)
13.61.020 Applicability. The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to all sewer services
provided, and to all work performed, by the Department. (Ord. 2394 Ch. n ~2, 6/2/86)
13.61.030 Inspection.
A. Authorized employees of the City, properly identified, shall have access, at
reasonable hours ofthe day, to all parts of a premises or building to which sewer and water service
is supplied by the City for the purpose of assuring conformity to these regulations.
B. Whenever the owner of any premises supplied by the Department restrains authorized
City employees from making such necessary inspections, sewer and water service may be refused
or discontinued. (Ord. 2394 Ch. II ~3, 6/2/86)
13 - 79'
1212001
13.61.040
13.61.090
.
13.61.040 Unlawful Acts Defined.
A. Any person causing damage to any property belonging to the Department shall be
liable to the Department for any and all damages resulting either directly or indirectly therefrom.
B. It shall be unlawful for any person to willfully disturb, break, deface, damage or
trespass upon any property belonging to or connected with the sewer and storm systems ofthe City
of Port Angeles, in any manner whatsoever.
C. It shall be unlawful for any person to place, deposit, or permit to be deposited in any
unsanitary manner on public or private property within the City of Port Angeles, or in any area under
the jurisdiction of said City, any human or animal excrement, garbage or other unsanitary waste.
D. It shall be unlawful to discharge to any natural outlet within the City of Port Angeles,
or in any area under the jurisdiction of said City, any sewage or other polluted matter, except where
suitable treatment has been provided in accordance with Chapter 13.06 PAMC. (Ord. 2394 Ch. n
~4, 6/2/86)
13.61.050 Discontinuance of Sewer Service. The City may discontinue or refuse sewer
service by reason of a failure to pay a bill for service or the failure to comply with the terms ofthis
Chapter, in accordance with the procedures established. by State law, this Chapter, and other City
ordinances. (Ord. 2394 Ch. II ~5, 6/2/86)
13.61.060 Administration.
A. The Director and the Director of Finance and Administrative Services may make such
administrative determinations for the proper operation of this Chapter as are not inconsistent with
its provisions.
B. The Director shall promulgate and enforce such customer service policies and related
additional rules, as may be deemed necessary from time to time to encourage and facilitate the
proper use of sewer and storm facilities, and as may be adopted by City Council resolution. (Ord.
2394 Ch. II ~6, 6/2/86)
t'3j5t;ad,O~$-ewef:'~e'~ufrifd'r The owner or owners of each lot 'or parcel of real property
within the area served or to be served by the City sanitary sewer system as it now exists or as it may
be extended, upon which lot or parcel is situated any building or structure for human occupation or
for any. purpose ~equiring the use of water which will produce se;wage, shall, P90r to approval by the
City of a certifica~e of occupancy or upon written notice from the-Director, cause a connection to be
made at the exp~se of the owner or owners between said City sanitary sewer system ,and each such
building or struc!Ure unless otherwise allowed pursuant to PAMC 13.61.090. (Ord. 2857 ~2,
2/17/95; Ord. 2394 Ch. IT ~7, 6/2/86)
13.61.080 Connection Made by Authorized Representatives. No person other than
representatives of the City shall make any connection to or opening into, use, alter or disturb any
public sewer or appurtenances thereof. (Ord. 2394 Ch. II 98, 6/2/86)
,J _ ~\'N" "":;'~~-' .~~ "~,, Ff' _"'''"*.''''' ~_~.". ~
.>1!i3;..6f-:096-'Pnvate\':lWastewat'eF,~lS' ,. '~ ., m~,~l,l(@M'e(J:BNYefiJ>
A. A revocable permit for leXits'tln, rivate wastewater disposal system may be
obtained from the Public Works Director er consultation with the County Health Officer for as
long as the existing system meets state and county requirements and does not cause any sanitary or
other health problems.
12/2001
13 - 80.
13.61.090
13.61.110
~~~~,etRrj~t~~<!i~~~p{~~al~~Y7flhe~Gi!y,~~~~i~g'J:l-e~jlfot~~~nst. ''I. -" ~~~gl9P
J:Q. !"Jt~lSJ\Rgc n=-.tanuary",1 ;=199~~for4:.when, ~'pn~te",wastewatef-dispo'sal-system 'hadLbeen UblS.mv
Blo ,"'" J"'," ~. iUed-pursuant-toc.P AM'G:-1-3",,6~1-;090-M the owner or owners may app e Director
of Public Works for an exemption from the requirement in P AMC 18.08.060 and P AMC 13.61.070
that the building be selVed by the City sanitary sewer system. The exemption may be granted only
if all ofthe following requirements are met:
1. The lot is further than 300 feet from the City sanitary sewer system or a lateral
thereof;
2. The cost of extending the City sanitary sewer system would be an economic
hardship on the owner or owners in that the estimated cost of a sewer extension would be over 200%
of the cost of an approved septic or other private wastewater disposal system;
3. The owner or owners have signed a non-protest agreement for an LID to
extend the City sanitary sewer system to the area; and,
4. The exemption will not be effective until a written permit for the septic or
other private wastewater disposal system is obtained from the ClalIam County Health Department.
C. This Section shall not be construed to intc;rfere with any additional requirements that
may be imposed by the Health Officer. At such time as a public sewer becomes available to a
property selVed by a private wastewater disposal system, a direct connection shall be made to the
public sewer within ninety (90) days in compliance with this Chapter, and any septic tanks,
cesspools, and similar private wastewater disposal facilities shall be cleaned of sludge and filled with
suitable material. (Ord. 2857 ~3, 2/17/95; Ord. 2394 Ch. IT ~9, 6/2/86)
13.61.100 Permit Required.
A. It is unlawful for any person to connect, or cause to be connected, repair, alter or cap,
a building or structure sewer or storm drain to any public sewer or public storm drain, without first
obtaining a permit for such activity from the City of Port Angeles.
B. It is unlawful for any person to uncover, make any connection to or opening into, use,
alter, or disturb, or cause any of these activities to occur concerning, any public or private sewer or
storm drain or appurtenance, without first obtaining a permit for such activity from the City of Port
Angeles. (Ord. 2394 Ch. II 910,6/2/86)
13.61.110 Permit Application and Issuance. .' l'
A. An 'application for a permit required under Section 13.61.100 shall be made by the
owner of the property on which the work is to be performed or bYJa licensed contractor representing
the owner. . <: .';
B. The permit application shall include such information as may be required by the
Director for determination as to whether the proposed work conforms to the requirements of this
Chapter and any other applicable City ordinance.
C. The permit application shall be accompanied by the fee required by this Chapter or
any resolution pursuant thereto.
. D. If the Director determines that the work conforms to all existing ordinances, and if
the fee is paid, the permit for such activity may be issued by the Director.
E. The application, when approved by the Director, shall constitute a binding obligation
whereby the owner agrees on behalf of himself and all successors in interest to conform to the
provisions ofthis Chapter, and other applicable ordinances, as now enacted or hereafter amended.
F. No application for sewer service shall be accepted or approved for locations outside
the sewer selVice area. (Ord. 2394 Ch. II ~II, 6/2/86)
13 - 81'
1212001
18.08.040
18.08.100
18.08.040 - Street and Access Requirements.
A. Street and access requirements for lots or parcels without established street access
shall be as set forth in PAMC 14.01.115.
B. Street and access requirements for short subdivisions shall be as set forth in Chapter
16.04 PAMC.
C. Street and access requirements for subdivisions shall be as set forth in Chapter 16.08
PAMC.
D. Development that creates pedestrian traffic on any arterial streets and any other streets
identified in the City's transportation plan as school walking routes shall include pedestrian
sidewalks. (Ord. 2857 ~1, 2/17/95)
18.08.050 - Water Service Requirements.
A. Single- family residences shall be served with potable water at the rate of two gallons
per minute at 30 psi and with fire flow at the rate of 1,000 gallons per minute at 20 psi or as
otherwise provided in the Uniform Fire Code.
B. Multi-family residences shall be served_with potable water at the rate of one gallon
per minute at 30 psi and with fIre flow at the rate established by the Uniform Fire Code.
C. Commercial and industrial buildings and structures shall be served with potable water
at the rate of one gallon per minute at 30 psi and with fire flow at the rate established by the Uniform
Fire Code. (Ord. 2857 ~ 1, 2/17/95)
NIm;c;l8;;:O~$<mlit~!yS_ewerR~!.ementsf Connection to the City's sanitary sewer system
shall be required as set forth in PAMC 13.61.070 unless a private wastewater disposal system is
allowed as set forth inPAMC 13.61.090; provided, however, that sanitary sewer service must have
the capability ofproccfssing ~OO gallons of water per day per person,:~(9:(4~~5;:1~~1~271~7795)P
~
18.08.070 - Stormwater Requirements. Stormwater discnarge shall be allowed only in
accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapters 13.63, 15.28, 16.04 and 16.08 PAMe and
the standards and guidelines adopted pursuant thereto. (Ord. 2857 ~1, 2/17/95)
."
18.08.080 - Solid Waste Service Requirements. Solid waste collection service shall be
compulsory, as set forth in PAMC 13.54.030. Recycling service shall be voluntary, as set forth in
PAMC 13.54.065. (Ord. 2857 ~1, 2/17/95)
18.08.090 - Electrical Service Requirements. All development of buildings and structures
shall include electrical service as set forth in Chapter 14.05 PAMC. The service shall be
underground unless the cost of underground electrical service is prohibitive as determined by the
Light Director pursuant to Light Department standards and guidelines. (Ord. 2857 ~ 1, 2/17/95)
18.08.100 - Telecommunication Service Requirements. All lots in new subdivisions and new
short subdivisions shall be provided with telecommunication services at or greater than the following
level of service standards:
A. Telephone: 1 service per dwelling unit or business.
B. Cable television: 1 service per dwelling unit. (Ord. 2857 gl, 2/17/95)
18 - 13
4/98
.
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
June 17,2002
To:
MA YOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
Brad Collins, Commu~ity Development Director~
Petersen Preliminary Short Plat SHP 02-02 Appeal
__w - --u------uu-FROM:
.
.
SUBJECT:
Summary: A preliminary short plat of property owned by Steve and Madonna Petersen was
approved on April 4, 2002. The approval of SHP 02-02 required seven (7) conditions for final
short plat approval. Although the Peters ens failed to make a timely appeal of the preliminary
short plat approval, because of irregularities between the City and the state laws regarding the
short plat review process, the City determined that an appeal should be heard by the City Council.
The Peters ens are appealing conditions which they feel are unreasonable and excessive.
Recommendation: The Department of Community Development recommends that the City
Council deny the appeal of the preliminary short plat approval of Petersen SHP 02-02, citing the 7
findings and 3 conclusions attached to the staff report.
Back~round / Analysis:
Steve and Madonna Peterson own a parcel of property at the southwest comer of W. 16th
Street and Evan Street. The property is not improved except for portions of W. 16th Street. Evans
Street is not open adjacent to the subject property. The area is zoned Residential Medium Density
(RMD), and there is a residential trailer park development north of the subject property across W. 16th
Street. The nearest electrical and sewer utilities are located north at the 15/16 alley and W. 15 Street
respectively. The properties to the west are developed as low density single family; to the east the
area is undeveloped; and to the south there is low density residential development with some vacant
property as well.
The Petersens believe that the short plat requirements are not consistent with the relatively
undeveloped character of the surrounding area and that the conditions make the street and utility
improvements cost prohibitive for their development. Development of the residential trailer park took
place many years ago and apparently was done on septic systems.
The City's short plat requirements now require sewer system improvements, and septic
systems are no longer allowed for either "long plat" subdivisions or short plats. There is no discretion
for the City to waive the subdivision requirements. During the Petersens' short plat review process,
they apparently were told by City staff that they could use septic systems and paid for septic system
design. The Petersens have been informed about the City's claim process by which they could make
a claim to be reimbursed for costs they may have incurred relying on erroneous advice from City
61
CC Memo -- Petersen Short Plat Appeal
June 17,2002
Page 2
employees. However, such a claim is not a basis for waiving short plat requirements or necessary
improvements for the Petersens' development. Therefore, there is no basis or precedent for approval
of the Petersens' short plat appeal.
Staff will be available to answer questions.
Attachments: Findings and Conclusions
Petersen Short Plat SHP02-02 Appeal Letter
Petersen-short Plat SIte. Plan
Parcel Map of the Area
62
.
.
.
.
.
.
CC Memo -- Petersen Short Plat Appeal
June 17,2002
Page 3
Denial of Petersen Short Plat SHP 02-02 Appeal
Findings:
1. The City of Port Angeles approved the preliminary short plat SHP 02-02 with seven
conditions on April 4, 2002.
2. Steve and Madonna Petersen appealed SHP 02-02 preliminary short plat conditions of
approval on May 29,2002.
3. The City's Comprehensive Plan, PAMC Chapter 16.04, and the City's Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines have been reviewed regarding SHP 02-02.
4. The subject property is located at the southwest comer of W. 16th and Evan Streets in a
Residential Medium Density (RMD) Zone.
5. The properties to the east, south, and west are zoned RMD, and the property to the north is
zoned Residential Trailer Park (RTP).
6. The streets abutting the subject property are either unopened or have minimal improvement.
7.
W. 16th and Evan Streets have some improved right-of-way west, north, and south of the
subject property.
Conclusions:
1. The Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) Chapter 16.04, the City's Urban Services
Standards & Guidelines, and the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan require certain street and
utility improvements for land divisions.
2. The conditions of approval for SHP 02-02 are consistent with the City's short plat
requirements for street and utility improvements necessary to meet the City's urban services
standards and the Comprehensive Plan concurrency requirements, particularly Utilities and
Public Services Element Policy C(2), Goal D and Policies D(1), D(9), D(II), and Goal E and
Capital Facilities Element Policies A(1), A(2), A(9).
3. The City's minimum urban services standards establish the precedent for the level of
improvements that are necessary to achieve the desired urban design of the City and to
overcome inadequate urban services previously made for existing development in the City.
63
.
.
.
64
.
Steve and Madonna Petersen
P.O. Box 164
Carlsborg, Wa 98324
Phone 683-2956
May 29, 2002
~ ~ C fE ll-WT~fm1
r ~!/ IjI
: KJV 29 ",",n
L 1'1 1..'''~J.. I-.::J
~
CITY Of PORT ANGELES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Honorable Mayor Wiggins and Counsel Persons;
Re: Preliminary Short Plat Decision - Petersen
Our proposal to short plat a 2.77 acre parcel described as the North ~ of sub Lot 105, is
consistent with the immediate surrounding area. Currently there are no street
improvements on 16th. Street from N to Evans Streets, on Owens, or Evans Streets.
The area is comprised of a residential trailer park and single-family homes. The trailer
park and homes are currently serviced by septic systems.
.
The short plat decisions prepared by the City Planning and Public Works Departments
are not consistent with the area, and will significantly increase the cost to develop this
parcel, thereby making development c,ost prohibitive.
We are appealing the following conditions as unreasonable and excessive.
3a) Newly dedicated 16th Street right of way must be improved with curb, gutter
and paving.
There are currently no street improvements on 16th From N to Evans Streets, on
Owens, or Evans Streets. It is unreasonable to improve just 342 ft. on one half of
16th Street, with improvements that do not tie into anything.
3b) Connection to the sanitary sewer at 15th And Owen.
When our application to short plat this parcel was submitted to the City Planning
Department, the city determined that we would not be subject to sewer installation
because our parcel was not within 200 ft. of the existing sewer main, and the cost
to install the sewer exceeded 200% of the cost to install septic systems. It was
further recommended that during the city application review process, we have soil
tests taken and septic designs completed, with the assistance of Clallam County
Health Department. We proceeded as recommended by the city, to test soils, and
design of septic systems, which has been completed and approved by the soils
engineer and ready to submit to Clallam County.
.
65
The cost to extend the sewer system including new manholes, connection fees
and restoration of the existing road far exceeds the current value ofthis parcel.
This condition is unreasonable and mechaillcally impossible. The elevation ofthe
existing sewer main, and the elevation at the end of the new sewer line does not
allow for sufficient fall. There is only 3.66 feet of elevation for the 890 lineal feet
of new sewer line, or .004112 of fall per foot. In addition the elevation ofthe
proposed lots will have a negative effect on the sewer system because of a 2-3%
slope away from the sewer main.
.
3f) Dedicate 35 ft. along the Evans Street frontage ofthe entire 317.5 foot of the
east side ofthe parcel for right of way.
The easterly portion ofthis parcel includes wetlands that extend from a 3.2 acre
wetland area on the immediately adjacent parcel. Condition #6 requires that we
delineate the wetland area on our property, and that no earth disturbing activity
occur within 50 foot of the area. Proposing a future right of way directly through
the wetlands is unrealistic and is not consistent with the City's wetland
preservation policy.
In addition dedicating the 35 feet restricts the parcel width to 76.5 feet, a mere 1.5
feet over the minimum required lot width. Not only would the parcels be
esthetically unappealing, it would limit the design of home that could be built on
them.
To summarize our position, requiring street and sewer improvements in an area where .
there are none, leads one to assume that we are being singled-out with such unreasonable
and excessive demands to merely develop a parcel of land to the same standards afforded
others in the immediate area. The cost to make the recommended improvements is
approximately $70,000.00, almost 200% of the current assessed value of this parcel.
Therefore we are requesting an exemption for the sewer extension, curb, gutter and
paving improvements, and dedication of the 35 feet of the easterly portion of this parcel
for future right of way.
Thank you in advance for your time.
Si~rely, .. D
J ~~.--- 'J... "~"i-. .t_
Steve Petersen '1
~:J)!i#}/J&L KdZ1-dr~
Madonna Petersen
t
66
A~
\J II
0)
~u: f": 40'
'4
~
~
w
j
o
I
.
PARK 1\
t)<.I';i To i ~..uH~
.
i" TH sr~Hr
NO Hwfl{ INfl/HA
l:!.1,ST 6.;~.c.,(1l,l)fI\I \ e"vlILut
t:.~I~T U IL, d.
/:
(1\,$ r nt t.~ Pe<uc
13c~t!.
f. x.1~T L~T
[Y.l!:.;: LI. T.
'-
ro.!v1!J. s.,.!.:e.: QE..P~TJj!YE~ lU- LoT IOS
PIl~CLL:t:t-06JClOl) 110500 Il.17f\C...
PAo Po_~ t;~!"OJ___[.!;l-9Rr. E...l:ll...__
.OW Nt/{ ;~_~':!~~.!!Lft..nr~ ,;y_~
fJ T~ :).-) I-C.)...
;.jOIUl..~ ~-613-1 Sb -J60-4(,o"'JI<1
(.,.,S'! l"
t
34~/
:as' A.uJ. FaA. N(..u "ZmPIl0lJ~1"le/'VT5
),118. C!:
~S..)
t. oT <D LoT@ _ 'toTQ) toT @
.. SF :>'7,14(0').5' ~.1- ). .., i I '1~. J.S {)r= ) 71 ,.~".)'5~;:
J.1.11J/4.U
O.bAAL. o. (, ),I'tC . 0.6 ~ AC.. o-b'J.~c...
I-
~ \Ii)
'" ~ -.i'
~ rjJ \\ rfY~
vJ rf .
..,
'" /f"
...., 3~ ~iopi.
~t1' L" I lJ)
Q.-J b J,Lop f.. I,? l-J,~ ,51.DP~ , ,.::.
I - ,v i
,..... - ~ C\I)
,..( \\ r"? (Y')
II) \
<'? ~ t"
~ ~~ ...
"
C"
,Nt- /
~~<..'"
yJ"\' /' "\
c;, ./ ,
9-\'''" . /./ 7 \
~u .'
~~ \
f
.I
/
./
...
~Ol
asS
8S.S I ___.~_.____ ~5..L_.___.
~::=--=-.==-:~_ Jit ~__, _ _ _ _ _
g s.:>-
.
.
.
68
.
.
.
f':o
'--
i
18
o
901'g()rtp()l~l'9l'~ll S,L01 aos
S:il1:a0NY .1.YOcI ,p>> eaaUMO.1.
.' ~!
%(,2
/ I4a .!!
I '" ~
. ~ ~
on
....
~
t;
*':
~; ;;
~
...
~
....
~
lilt
. ,~ ,
~'Il' ~
..
I
"
~'.1
'J
l
, ,
. d
i I :
__.J..
J.33~.J.$
.. ~._'
''\ -
.'
..,..,.,~
\:- J
... \B'
~ I . ~
.
"\) 1 I:
I!: . \
~ ~
'! , S '\f'\
: d '^ !
.. J s.
. \
... .-
... ...... 'BIOI
"
II
II
.1.3311.I.$
,
. d
- I" ~
;: "
\
1-. ..d
,~ ..
"
0-
...
t;.
i
I':
~
'I !}
~ i ~
..:
~
~
: ' . 3n/GAff
. = Ii 'a
:: I ~
.. to
i I !!!
69
!a
m~
t'
e t -
~,d.
- .:1-
1I0SS3SsrI .u.NntX)
_".
i ~ ~l
";:r...
~;\,
....
i.,"
'P.,
l \' ,po(
t.~'~
N3AfO
l
1:
f a
\;,. i
t
~
Ie
Ii J~ .I ,
..... '0 .};
\ e ,8 ~. ~ .
tl'ie.i~t~ ~i:
il i D f I CIJ-'&oD
.n , .,~
. '':'~ i
. .. ~'oi
ii 1:". ~ U1
~:i&li !... ; f . ..
OJr.;:"C1 _,. ~
\{3..~ tv
a ~!i i, >!. t~1 \ .
ci1' 'i=:
-! I d
If
...
'1l. _
.N.
r
1i
/ i
..,...' I
~.... I
11. I
5
I
'1 /
. I
-~
" . I
I' ,
I
I
,
j
I
J
I
:
, . ~
1'N77&'7::J "r
,.
,.
.i . .'
.
.
.
70
.
/
405 E. Front #1
Port Angeles, WA 98362
June 14, 2002
City of Port Angeles
Attn: Brad Collins
Re: Austin-Glaubert Property
Dear Mr. Collins:
I own the property at 405 E. Front St. (since 1970) south of the above property
which I understand is being considered for a rezone from light industrial.
The property in question is a natural wetland and is home to many birds, animals
and marine life .
I would protest vigorously any rezoning that would allow building on this
property. It would seriously endanger my property (Knebes and Hartmans also)
by weakening the bank. Also, any action destroying or changing the estuary/pond
.
would deprive many citizens of the Joy of feeding and watching that wetland.
I look directly down on that property and I've observed .vcorJ c:. f:rw: 'J0J':I Cf1.~'ly
morning until late at night 1,atching the wildlife.
Thank you for considering my request.
S>;Jc~~elY, }
~.YYl.
Thelma M. Hetrick
fh-tAJ-C/?G
~I ~ J~N ~ 4fi 2:2 ~I~
I
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Drawing submitted to City Council on June 17,
2002, by M/M Steve Petersen re. Petersen Short
Plat Appeal has been placed in the City Clerk
General File - Oversized Documents
-:~J
~ "
I ~ I
"
\ .~.. I
" I
\SJ
~
V) " ',1,
',I"
,\. ,'\ "
~I ,
~ I"~
'-
~ "
t-- "
\,
--
~l J
-...&. ) ~
, ' , <::;:)
J ~
t:: .\ \
<:::l
~
\.J... " ~l ~
'--.j
'~ \::)
\..... ""- ~
\f) ~ ~
~ ::?
,,'"'\ ;::
~ ~ \f'
-
~
::> ~
\}j ~
uJ
N
0
0
V N
..... r-:'
>=:
<l) ......
'" <l)
..... >=:
E ~
<l)
~
<l)
;>
<l)
......
ifJ
~
;>.
,D
...... <a
'8 <l)
S 0-
0-
0 <c:
U......
.o~
.....~
Ut::
o 0
........s:=
"'ClifJ
<l) =
t:: <l)
's '"
.....
,D <l)
~ ~
ifJ~
, , t't.S; it' :!, ~'}if,i1.. "Ill J ~ ~ J~
'.'~' .~.r~,~;~ '1/1\1/1.41,1: 1,\,.;
, "1'" , " '_". ", ,), J,
... JI't~J ~'~'~~'r):,,\I" h.;i
~ . ~jt."..;. ~\,'~r!' .~~ "I, II, . ';~':t
Hl.....,.,..i)Yj;."ll .~.', I' ,', )1;;/
4 1:\ .ty,! , . Ii ,~ ,I 1)/,"" fJI.lj.
, ~'~"ll I." ~i' ~ ,~,f' ~ii :I!r'fl
'41 '''~)'r('"\'l':J:'. " '1(!~J;IJ
. ,.1. .' "ll~' t.;"~' ' ",ll' '. J~;'.~{J_~,l
~ '. 'I i~' ( '.' I., .~" j ',"$f:'jJ;~~""
';1" ' '" ,..~,IJ1'~:I"'"
, .~. \~.:!" 'I ~~,I'!:$~'tt.~'!,:;~.
, I."~,,\/,' : 1, :.,1jf.!:X1i;'(j/;:
" .t"11 ' " ,~(, '>tv'" iJ'I":
~(. .,\'; i,. :l. rJ'....I...~t,:-j!!;\'r;'
t .', '. I,,' 11 J't,:, ~"V ~>:t.'~li~ '1
~ ,'~ ,1/," ': ( : I I "l,:':'~;.~~J",\'i})J;/:
\ ",- , .. , 1 f" '11"1\1\' I f"""
, ", :' ~' , . I I, ,'"l)}.'; ~ll.J I . "J\,','
~ "."1 It,' ,'/' 1,1../ ,,/,t,.f, " .'
:i', .I^"II";'H"'~I'~ ,J..... 4"',1"
I r ;. .' .. ;,1:" 'l I't ""t. J, ift,:t,t'l
.. " t'" , 4...." n" ) . ,{ \":;,, '1 "'-
, :~,>~". "~I ~ ~ IJ 1"~!,,'::'~'~,~l ~l!.Y\,:j)'J~
)""" .......::~:;::;;iX;:}::::
'\. ':: .~. ""..~'hl\rJ'~(ll,',., .
, ~." : ''.,t' ~!I l,;r ...,:;. )~ ,.:' ~ "
.':" ,~/j:L,:~:,:";~,y,::r'~::
\ . ~ < <:,~?;'.t~.:'~',:/..J' '/:~;<"~';'\I } I"'~'
.... ' f} ,j! .1,~11I\ "f', ',.", ,.1 ..,I
. ';'~'~"1' ~.....(,H't~i""''''-'' 'j -' I'~ I ) I "
1\, :1,\ '!, ;~.~~~~~'~,... ~" ~;'~d/, '" .:' :'( \'._ ;
';'~"'M!,"" :~~i~(t.1~.:.:~,' . I"<'~" ,
I "" t. I., II ,\, ",' ., \ \) " ~
"', ";':f ~\' :r::~~;:~::'!!~::"';:2;"~": ::::{::~';i~::;{.' ,i~,,~'
:", ,111,1' 'i~'..: I'lr<:":'l~~,'titl'"
. :) ,\ .;' .' " ,', '\; t ~,(); ,tj!
""it \ (. .,,'.....: ;/!"/-i: It' . ,It.'!:... 'I
'. ',\ ~. I ;\ '/,',.t "t'\ ~:tl\~~<\'1
, " ,,; ! <t t ~ 1\ ,,',J ~VI4. I
" t . :f'i;~il.:~:~\':,::ll~,;:~~~~'lt~tI~~
,'. , I'''' \. ,'~. ,~... I, ~ir',1~~~{~
'",,1, I" ,.,:,;,.I~ /tY, ~.~~,t:~,;/'~
\ "1\' \ ': ".' \).' /j '\~~.,l~,~,\..(~~
. ;'1 't ,'1'",' ':~'I":""'.;:i,-'t'~'lliv'h.~
L>' >:1 ,f,ll. ':1'~ 1\' t.t:t'.f,I\,A.,1
... ' .'~ ":.11'~\ lt~ " 'J ,.....~ .~)~..{lfBl\~;
-" \', \ ,'11' l'~..l :1 ,:';~1.r~!\'\~\~'.f~J.i~V(f'
.~ '\ ";'~'!I\: ~~,j,: J",!:,~::':~~;4t,l~.~
'" \ 'j Ct1f ....~'. 't {~""'\ tJ.ll,'J.";tJ":'\;
~ : .~ I ,~' ~..I .,.....~ ',','1.\ ,r):~'t~
.., 1'1 :'\i:} , I \'~."i~J~~,:~t',.~~:~~l
~..,...... 'O,\! ~"J.. '.1 :. <.', \,.7' \;..t,l
~ '~f:. ''':~:..:'''::~~ ~ ::1\ 'j
" .~>~~.t 1:,- ~.;'- '~! (( ;;9',\'1
. ~.d J~~.I/. ~~I, ~,~.~tl~
. .', 'I~ ~\
, " ,. ,:', 'I;;;
.. j' \,~
, ~~'~~" .,'
,,=:.\~ J
{;~~r::"l,: .,;,,~
!I.
;, 'i:"
t. ~..
, ;;.:..11t '
, Y' ~ ,;
~ ~ :. 'l :.
t', -., f' ....11
H \: ;,.'
?,~
I
1
(
",', \'
J
v
~
~
\
~
;;Z
~
~
k
I/)
X
~
V\
~
-:::>
~
,1\
....~.~
.J
"
11~.', !'
} ,,~ 'I'
- y.~;'l
'" .i;~:'~:~
,':i~""1
,ltn;{
i.'" t'. ?',:
~'~ ~;17
,/ '~';I.\~
,I. ',I.t:t
, f ,t~,....,
" ~...
~~,-i'rll
J\ ;,",,1
:',:.::", I
',.:', "f,':
. .
".
"
",
. .",
'. .
~
,. ,
,
> :\
I
'"
'.'
,
'. {,
"
~
, . ~,,\.t'
- ';:\
"i~.~: ~:
-).~.t... ,l,
: ~ ~i..1 r ~
"'(.. :J _ t '>;~: ~
# : 7t.."
.'~.. .
,,~ , ~; ;.., '\r'
.;~~ ~.' \:~
{ ~ '. A'
.... .... ~i."(\1,I:
~ ~t:~~~,1 / ~!
, ~~, '1"t: f/i " r.'
j" It fir'lL 1"'11 I' "j.,
" *,,'1"" I' { " .
'~:;A:~f;'l i{,.::,!,
.) ) 1,,\ -.;}l,J, ,'> " '~~:..'"
'>'->, ,:,,;'F::"r.>,~T:::'" I !~~,~,:{~t
,,-. ,,"!""t'4~'~..;; .\ " .~I."I,,'
..""~t~trf>
, ;' '~I . ! .,': ;' ',;\;:.::(~,
, ~I....' '~', I' 'J.' I " t,~':Y '.
, .... ' .~ i" f, ; ': ~'l i..., \t ~,
: ,f " ,"',,_
l' )"'.',', ,\r,~: "'~'".I~' " ,;r?~1 '
". ,I' 1 ~':~~~.;~ ~~.,I, J :'-'1'
^, '. ,....'
",'
..,
;.'~
,
,
"
. ~. I
~.._ ~"~.;;'IiL.~')~'~--
-",
l'
~
<e::l
~
I
~
~\ ~
~ ~
""- ~
~ \..::
\l"\
~ -
:::.<.
~ ,--\)
~
~
P
":t
~
$
'::::1
....
'-
t-
If)
......
~
uJ
\J\
~
w
VV~ST lie 7H ~--rAttT (f/(DH
TO El/4?J~ SIJ
Submitted to CIty CouncIl by M/M Steve Petersen re.:
Petersen Short Plat Appeal
. ,
/'I :;;T
June 17,2002
y~
$T~I 0 P fl!/)fO!;tj)
V Ff.-DU"T!tf:tG
~ 14P~6VtJIErJl€- w
L' .
~AiI-"#J:.:.
~~-
.' ,
~' t-,',:
'.
"
,-:,~~-:: t'-~>'
" ,
';... . ...'- ,.' ,,~,.,."
. ~ ~~-.
" " ~ ~ "~~';l'~:-
.. ~ -~.....".-~ .. '0... ....:._:., _6 __, (".
, ,.::'.,:' .;. ':':,':~';':-:.:.,..> I
I-
I -
e
r.." ...
" .
, r
.' .
:-
. "
W. /~r~ 4 N 6T.
ft/sf/Nt, ;/{Oif}) eHljJf)tI> Stf'f/v -- WllJrH /71
tJ. / Ip r-lf, "5 T
E'USlrA.)fq /Colt]) - 300 I FI::./)H '/\/'/- C!..H-/P 5t-4i..J
13 I oJ 17)71-!
e /J)'/6 Y:it. f () me-Nt;
['i/STIIJ f:1 Ii) If]) - f({~K... /fl - WrDTH
.
~.
I)). /01.Jt ST @ P/t)fEI?.TY ,. f){./'STINq (l.o-IfP - /(061:.-
lJJ rDtrlf N' J
!tJ . da rt+ (2 f t-o ftt-r- 'f
lj/5T/tUq t:.{) fro - j( ()uZ
wrDTH .5{D I
.6'
;' {ii;;;;,:;.'
~ ," :t~l~ ~; p . ~:' I,. ", w
1: ,\' I;; t~ ~: . \,,', c, ..
,I ,f ~ \~J',~~ 0,\ j't'",
(,' i~, . ,I t, I. .
I t". ,~,1.r'i If,''f. '. ': "
. , t' ""~',~~V) '!'I.)
f' : ~(f.l/;t:. ,l' '!
, .. I, ~~ ..?~;~l~r; 'I' ,;:. "
<.,' .'.}:..!J;:L\',:) :. ,II.', J
,\;"~',~..:'i lj;:'~I::'" )
; ': .~~)'.\',..I ,t' ,I"
''"'';.~ ~_"/ttV' I ,hl~7': I
I .l.: \fll ill}' ,'(',
, ::.j!r~:~t:::';: ~:~:'.
;,~.. ;',r:1,'.', ';' , " .
'. r,l~ '(: I:~":/ . "
;/;,:,~~~,:",:i :;i', ' i"
i 'j~r',~' \:, \ 'H '
:,:: :;,}~3.~/\;~~'
. ;:t: ~.("~, ,I ..)...
.. .:::rr,i/,.,.: 1
1~!i!~o;,1;.
, '" .J(t ..' <. "~'
~: .r:~;~\J;
'\~l [;. p:. " ;
. ' ~. ',-'0 ,I
"l," ,\ ~ ,I.
.' " ;,. :: ': I
,,(.' ' ,', ,
.. '0',," '
':.~, ',:/; \:';;
, I. 'I" '\ ',\ I I' ,.
. ,'.. '~', '", ,j:'
"
.,. '
N
o
o
N
1"-"
.....
o..i
....
:::
<l)
'"
....
<l)
.....
<l)
~
<l)
>
2
C/.l
~
.. j'
,
~
~
....... .......
..... ~
U <l)
S 8:
0<
U.....
0.$
..... ~
Ut::
.9]
"'dC/.l
~ :::
.... <l)
S ~
.D <l)
::l .....
C/.l~
". .~'
, .'
J
~
C)
~
A
"t'
", <:J
~
0-
<-
-...
~
v')
......
X
J--u
/;;'
~
4J
~
"\J
~
~
\
~
"
:Q
:t-
~
~
"-..J
~
\[)
~
%
~
'0
~
\f)
VI
~
IJv
:3
U>
','.:.,/tW
'< ': ,:<c;";'::I<',
: :':~)~f:\
/ '1"(' .:.,~,;'I. ~ .
};~f'
1 I .~'}~7~~1~~t') I ','
f/;"f'/; ';:~::
)_" .'. ,J'
,j 1'<\
i '
'.: .
d
()
~
, '.
,,'
A
:<
Lu
I
~
~
~
f\
~
~
~
, ~'
J)
'<
.........
t-....
V'1
""
'-<
4.J
,'''t'
, "
C3J
~.<':,
!
I ' ~ \
\ ,'1'1' ,
,,""
: \~.\
.
.
.
~ORT ANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
June 17,2002
To:
MA YOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
Brad Collins, Community Development Director ~
2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Summary: The 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendments CPA 02-01 includes 20 new policies
and objectives and 3 proposed map changes.
Recommendation: Following close of the public hearing, the Department of Community
Development recommends that the City Council adopt the 20 new policies and objectives but
only half of the map changes as recommended by City staff, citing the attached 17 findings and 7
conclusions. The proposed map changes for the Rayonier Mill site should be deferred until the
Department of Ecology has analyzed the cleanup remedial investigation sampling data and for
expansion of the Downtown commercial in the PeabodylRailroad shoreline area should be left as
is with an imprecise margin between industrial, open space, and commercial land use
designations due to the conflicting land uses in this area. .
Backeround I Analysis:
State legislation mandated that the City of Port Angeles complete a comprehensive review
of the Comprehensive Plan every seven years. The City focused on the Harbor Planning Area in
2002 and will update eastside planning areas in 2003 and westside planning areas in 2004, consistent
with new Growth Management Act requirements.
The Planning Commission conducted a six month public involvement planning process that
included many stakeholders in the Harbor and Downtown areas. Many of these stakeholders not
only participated but also made suggestions and comments regarding proposed amendments. Adding
Comp Plan objectives to incorporate projects and land use actions that the Harbor and Downtown
stakeholders would like to see happen in the next five years could facilitate the desired urban design
of the City and encourage growth that the community wants. The proposed changes are consistent
with the existing Comprehensive Plan policies and current land use patterns.
The City staffhas distributed eleven Comprehensive Plan amendments for public review and
comment. The Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding CPA 02-01 on May 8 and
continued to May 22, 2002. The 2002 amendments focus on an update of major projects in the
Harbor Planning Area that includes the Port Angeles Downtown. Eight of the eleven Comp Plan
amendments involve Harbor Planning Area policy, objective, or map changes, and the remaining
three amendments apply city-wide.
71
CC Memo CPA 02-01
June 17, 2002
Page 2
The Planning Commission and the Department of Community Development staff both .
recommend policy and objective amendments in the Comprehensive Plan as follows:
Land Use Element
Add new Commercial Policy D(3) -- The City should vacate rights-ofway to facilitate retention
of existing businesses and location of new businesses where land assembly is necessary to achieve
the desired urban design of the City.
Add new Commercial Objective D(l) -- The City will work with the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe
to develop a cultural center and marinafor large pleasure boats located in Port Angeles Harbor.
Add new Commerci,al Objective D(2) -- The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that
designates land uses, improves public access to shorelines, abates deteriorating structures, and
allows for expanded recreational and commercial uses.
Add new Commercial Policy F(4) -- The City should work with the Port Angeles Downtown
Association to develop urban design review guidelines that facilitate architectural elementslfeatures
which will encourage complimentary and aesthetically pleasing new development in the Central
Business District (CBD).
Add new Commercial Objective F(l).- The City will assist the Chamber of Commerce and the .
Port Angeles Downtown Association in developing an historic underground walking tour activity
focused on Laurel Street.
Add new Commercial Objective F(2) -- The City will assist the Chamber of Commerce and the
Port Angeles Downtown Association in developing a waterfront promenade along the Downtown
waterfront.
Add new Commercial Objective F(3) -- The City will encourage community events such as holiday
ceremonies, town gatherings, arts and crafts displays, and special business activities such as a
Farmers' Market during the tourist season, particularly in the Downtown area and on Laurel Street.
Add new Industrial Objective H(l) -- The City will develop an industrial marine (1M) zone for
shoreline uses similar to the upland industrial park (IP) zone which allows for mixed commercial
and industrial uses.
Add new Industrial Objective H(2) -- The City will establish a Harbor Study committee comprised
of private and public stakeholders in harbor uses and activities to reveiw and revise the Harbor
Resource Management Plan, considering changes that have occurred in the past 12 years and
visions that now seem possible.
Add new Open Space Objective J(2) -- The City will review new development for covered areas
or wind screens to allow greater use of outdoor facilities and public spaces during inclement
weather.
.
72
.
.
.
CC Memo CPA 02-01
June 17,2002
Page 3
Add new Open Space Objective J(3) -- The City will support development of a public golf course.
Add new Open Space Objective J(4) .- The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that
designates land uses, improves public access to shorelines, abates deteriorating structures, and
allows for expanded recreational and commercial uses.
Transportation Element
Add new Objective A(2) -- The City will work with the property owner to assure completion of the
Waterfront Trail through the former Rayonier Mill site.
Add new Objective A(3) -- The City will incorporate bicycle friendly amenities including bike path
development and maintenance, signage, and storage into new transportationfacility improvements.
Add new Objective A(4) -- The City will encourage public streetscape improvements such as street
trees, seasonal displays, and pedestrian amenities through a comprehensive development and
maintenance plan.
Add new Objective B(lO) -- The City will update transportation policies to refocus circulation
patterns, street improvements, essential state highways, truck routing, and traffic controls
throughout the City.
Conservation Element
Add new Objective D(2) -- The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that designates land
uses, improves public access to shorelines, abates deteriorating structures, and allows for expanded
recreational and commercial uses.
Capital Facilities Element
Add new Objective A(5) -- The City will establish a review process with a more comprehensive
analysis of Capital Facilities Plan projects to address new mandates for environmental protection
such as the Endangered Species Act, extension of urban services into the Urban Growth Area and
new residential areas within the City, and needs to preserve and maintain service levels impacted
by changes such as the Elwha Dam removal, landfill closure, and agingfacilities.
The Planning Commission and the Department of Community Development staff both
recommend the following actions on the attached map revision proposals:
1) Downtown -- expansion of the commercial land use designation west along Marine Drive.
2) Ediz Hook -- expansion of the commercial land use designation west from the Puget Sound Pilots
to the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe leaseholdings along the shoreline,!inside Port Angeles Harbor.
73
CC Memo CPA 02-01
June 17,2002
Page 4
3) Rayonier -- defer expansion of the commercial land use designation on the former Rayonier Mill
site until completion of the MTCA remedial investigation study is done.
.
The Planning Commission modified Land Use Element Commercial Objective F(4) and
recommended against Capital Facilities Element Objective A(4) as follows:
Land Use Element
Add new Commercial Objective F(4) -- The City will del'etop consider various parking options
including the COtlo5f1 uctioll (Yf a pal killg .stl uctw e alld the put chase of o5urftce pal killg lot(s) to
mitigate parking impacts from the Gateway Project to Qchiue 110 net l0055 of pal king/OI ctlo5tomel
k' e' 'k'" k"
pal lIlg, lty pefllllt jJQI mg, aHa Long teflll pal lIlg,
Capital Facilities Element
Add new Objective A(4) -- The City will study the development of a seasonal or permanent ice
skating rink facility.
The City Administration modified one of the Land Use Map proposed changes as follows:
.
1) Downtown -- expansion of the commercial land use designation east along Victoria Street should
be left as is due to the conflicts in this shoreline area between industrial, open space, and commercial
land uses.
Attachments: Ordinance
Fmdmgs and ConclusIOns
Plannmg Commission Mmutes Excerpts
Public Comment Letters
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposals CPA 02-01
.
74
. ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, amending
Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan by adding new
policies and objectives to the Land Use Element, the Transportation
Element, the Conservation Element, and the Capital Facilities Element
to support specific land use decisions, particularly in the Harbor
Planning Area, and by making two Land Use Map changes along the
harbor shoreline and in the Port Angeles downtown area.
WHEREAS, the City of Port Angeles adopted its present Comprehensive Plan on June
28, 1994, by Ordinance 2818; and
WHEREAS, the City has established a process for amending the Comprehensive Plan
by Ordinance 2858 and Chapter 18.04 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, SEP A review of the proposed amendments was completed on May 22,
.
2002; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing, has considered the Planning
Commission's recommendations, and has entered its findings and conclusions addressing elements
set forth in P AMC 18.04.060 and in support of adopting the proposed 2002 Comprehensive Plan
amendment; and
WHEREAS, the proposed 2002 Comprehensive Plan amendment has been determined
to be consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan, the Clallam County-Wide Planning
Policy, the Growth Management Act, and the public health, safety, and welfare;
WHEREAS, the State Legislature has mandated a comprehensive review of City and
County Comprehensive Plans adopted under the Growth Management Act, and the State Office of
Community Development provided the City of Port Angeles grant funds to update the City's
.
Comprehensive Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
75 -1-
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
.
Section 1. Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map are
hereby amended by extending the commercial land use designation west from the downtown to
include the area roughly bounded by Marine Drive on the north, Cedar Street on the west, and the
2/3 alley on the south, as set forth in the revised maps attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and Exhibit
"e".
Section 2. Ordinance 2818 and the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map are hereby
amended by properly relocating the commercial land use designation of an area roughly forty-five
acres in size, including portions of OutIots 5, 6, and 7 on Ediz Hook and including uplands south
of the Ediz Hook Road and adjacent tidelands and submerged lands, as set forth in the revised maps
attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and Exhibit "C".
Section 3. Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are here.
amended by amending the Commercial Policies and Objectives section ofthe Land Use Element to
read as follows:
v. LAND-USE ELEMENTS
General Comments
The Land Use Element establishes City policy regarding how land may be developed. This element
and its Land Use Map establishes the following six comprehensive plan land use categories:
Low Density Residential,
Medium Density Residential,
High Density Residential,
Commercial,
Industrial, and
Open Space.
These land use categories are described below and located on the Land Use Map (See Figure 10).
Low Density Residential (Up to 9 Units per Net Acre)
.
The Land Use Map identifies three separate categories of residential development. The first is Low
76 -2-
.
Density Residential which allows an overall residential density of a project or property to range up
to 9 units per net acre. The high majority of residentially designated property in the City will be of
this designation. It is intended for the development of single family homes. It also allows for the
development of duplexes and planned residential developments in accordance with the underlying
zonmg.
Medium Density Residential (Up to 15 Units per Net Acre)
The primary intent of this designation is for the development of multiple residential unit projects
including but not limited to duplexes, townhomes, condominiums, apartments and planned
residential developments at a density up to 15 units per net acre.
High Density Residential (Up to 43 Units per Net Acre)
The primary intent ofthis designation is for development at a density up to 43 units per net acre and
is intended for areas where a higher concentration of residents is compatible with the surrounding
area and uses. Condominiums, apartments, and planned residential developments are the types of
building designs appropriate for this category.
Commercial
.
The Land Use Map contains one commercial category, thus providing maximum flexibility to the
City's Zoning Ordinance in regulating the types of commercial uses and their permitted locations.
Industrial
The Land Use Map also designates only one industrial category, thus again providing maximum
flexibility to the City's Zoning Ordinance in regulating the types of industrial uses and their
permitted locations.
Open Space
The Open Space category includes areas ofthe City that contain unique or major physical features,
such as marine shorelines, bluffs, ravines, major streams, wetlands, critical wildlife habitat, and
other natural areas deemed of significant importance to the community. This category also includes
park and recreational uses. The development of natural open space areas shall be limited to only that
which is necessary and does not degrade the significance of the area.
Land Use Map Goal, Policies, and Objective
Goal
A
To guide current and future development within the City in a manner that provides
certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the
challenges and opportunities of the future.
.
77
- 3 -
Policies
.
1. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map should be used as a conceptual guide
for determining current and long range zoning and other land use decisions. The
map's land use designations are intended to show areas where general land use
types are allowed. The area between land use designations should be considered
an imprecise margin in order to provide flexibility in determining the boundary
of such areas. When determining appropriate zoning designations for an area
near a margin, the goals, policies and objectives ofthe Land Use Element should
take precedence.
2. All land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council and/or any of its
appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and its land use map.
Objective
1. The City will review and revise as necessary the existing Zoning
Ordinance, Zoning Map, and other development regulations to ensure
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan.
Residential Goals and Policies
.
Goal
B. To have a community where residential development and use of the land are done in a
manner that is compatible with the environment, the characteristics of the use and the
users, and the desired urban design of the City.
Policies
1.
Urban services shall be available for all residential areas as required by the
Capital Facilities Element concurrency policy.
2.
Single family lots should be of reasonable shape and should have access
provided by an alley or by a local access street or a collector arterial.
3.
All residential developments should be designed with the provisions of fire
protection and service vehicle access as key factors in street design and
circulation pattern. For efficient circulation, rights-of-way should be obtained
and improvements made to further the grid street pattern of the City. Cul-de-
sacs may be permitted when designed as an integral part ofthe major grid street
pattern of the City. .
All residential developments should be encouraged to preserve and capitalize
on existing unusual, unique, and interesting natural, historic, archaeological,
4.
78
-4-
.
and/or cultural features, should preserve and utilize natural vegetation, should
utilize and preserve scenic views, should maximize southern exposures and solar
efficiency, should offer protection from prevailing winds, and should be
designed to minimize energy use.
5.
Planned Unit Development and Planned Residential Development techniques
should emphasize the overall density of the development rather than individual
lots or dwelling units.
Goal
C. To have a community of viable districts and neighborhoods with a variety of residential
opportunities for personal interaction, fulfillment and enjoyment, attractive to people
of all ages, characteristics and interests.
Policies
1.
Residential land should be developed on the district and neighborhood concept.
Although such districts may be composed primarily of residential uses of a
uniform density, a healthy, viable district should be composed of residential uses
of varying densities which may be augmented by subordinate and compatible
uses. Single family and multi-family homes, parks and open-spaces, schools,
churches, day care and residential services, home occupations, and district
shopping areas are all legitimate components of district development and
enhancement. A neighborhood should be primarily composed oflow, medium,
or high density housing.
.
2. Medium and high density housing should be located in areas of the community
most suitable for such uses, based on existing services, public facilities, and
transportation.
3. Medium and high density housing should be served by arterial streets of
sufficient size in order to satisfy traffic demand and to lessen neighborhood
traffic congestion.
4. Medium and high density housing could be a transitional use between different
land uses, provided such other uses would not adversely impact the residential
nature of the housing.
5. Medium and high density housing policies should apply to mobile home parks.
6. Manufactured homes that meet current state regulations should be treated as any
other housing for land use purposes.
.
79
- 5 -
Commercial Goals and Policies
.
Goal
D. To create and maintain a healthy and diverse commercial sector for a balanced and
stable local economy.
Policies
1. The City should encourage new and existing commercial developments and
businesses which are consistent with the goals and policies of this
Comprehensive Plan.
2. Public uses such as government offices, public service buildings, and other
public and quasi-public facilities and services may be allowed in commercially
designated areas.
~ The City should vacate rights-of-way to facilitate retention of existing businesses
and location of new businesses where land assembly is necessary to achieve the
desired urban design of the City.
Objectives ,
.L. The City will work with the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe to develop a cultura
center and marina for large pleasure boats located in Port Angeles Harbor.
2. The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that designates land uses.
improves public access to shorelines. abates deteriorating structures. and allows
for expanded recreational and commercial uses.
Goal
E. To provide shopping opportunities which meet the needs of all City residents and
visitors in safe, usable shopping areas that are compatible with the surrounding area and
uses, the environment, and the desired urban design ofthe City.
Policies
1.
Urban services shall be available for all commercial areas as required by the
Capital Facilities Element concurrency policy.
2.
New commercial developments should occur only where urban services a.
adequate to accommodate them. These developments should follow a dust
configuration rather than a strip pattern.
80
- 6 -
.
3.
Commercial development should buffer its impacts on adjacent residential uses.
Where commercial development is adjacent to residential uses, the commercial
development should incorporate elements in the site design to soften the impacts
on the residential uses.
4. Service access should be distinct from parking areas and separated from
pedestrian areas wherever and whenever possible to accommodate pedestrian
and vehicular traffic.
5. Commercial development outside the Highway 101 corridor should not be in a
strip pattern.
6. New Comprehensive Plan commercial area designations should not be located
along the alternate local crosstown route or the crosstown truck route.
7. District shopping areas should be located at the intersections of arterial streets
of sufficient size to satisfy traffic demand and at the boundaries of
neighborhoods so that more than one neighborhood may be served.
8.
District shopping area uses should be allowed in residentially designated areas
as long as they are in accordance with the planning area/district/neighborhood
land use concept and as long as they do not encourage traffic from outside the
district or increase traffic congestion within residential neighborhoods..
.
Goal
F. To provide a pleasant, safe, and attractive shopping environment in the traditional
downtown waterfront area which provides a wide variety of shopping, dining,
entertainment, and housing opportunities for visitors and residents alike.
Policies
1. Commercial development in the traditional downtown should reemphasize its
waterfront location and historic heritage, should be oriented to pedestrians and
tourists, and should provide maximum enj oyment ofthe environment and public
amenities as well as protection from adverse weather conditions.
2. The City should continue to promote improvements to the traditional downtown
area, through beautification projects and in cooperation with downtown business
merchants.
3. Residential uses should be encouraged for the downtown area as part of a
mixed-use development concept.
.
4.
The City should work with the Port Angeles Downtown Association to develop
urban design review guidelines that facilitate architectural elements/features
81
- 7 -
which should encoura e com limenta and aestheticall
development in the Central Business District (CBD).
Objectives
L The City will assist the Chamber of Commerce and the Port Angeles Downtown
Association in developing an historic underground walking tour activity focused
on Laurel Street.
2. The City will assist the Chamber of Commerce and the Port Angeles Downtown
Association in developing a waterfront promenade along the Downtown
waterfront.
3. The City will encoun~ge community events such as holiday ceremonies. town
gatherings. arts and crafts displays. and special business activities such as a
Farmers' Market during the tourist season. particularly in the Downtown area
and on Laurel Street.
4. The City will develop consider various parking options induding the
e01l5twction of a pa1king 5t1 aCIDI' and the (lUlchas" of 5tllface pa1king lot(s) to
mitigate parking impacts from the Gateway Proiect to a"hieve 110 net loss of
parking for custom,,! pa1king, City permit pa1king, and long tellu parking.
.
Industrial Goals and Policies
Goal
G. To create and maintain a healthy and diverse industrial sector for a balanced and stable
local economy.
Policies
1. The City should promote a cooperative intergovernmental plan for
comprehensive development of industrial infrastructure and amenities to attract
and support light and heavy industry.
2. Office and commercial uses may be allowed in specific designated industrial
areas.
3. The William R. Fairchild International Airport should be considered an essential
public facility as referenced in Appendix B (Clallam County-Wide Planning
Process).
.
82
- 8 -
Section 4.
.
INDUSTRIAL POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES
Goals
H. To provide opportunities for industrial development in a manner which efficiently uses
the community's various attributes and natural resources, has minimal impact on the
environment, and contributes to the City's quality of life.
Policies
1. Urban services shall be available for all industrial areas as required by the
Capital Facilities Element concurrency policy.
2. Infrastructure which makes sites attractive and ready to develop, including
transportation facilities and utilities, should be available at industrial parks.
Industrial development should be encouraged to follow industrial park design
concepts.
3.
Industrial areas should buffer their impact to mitigate nuisance and hazardous
characteristics such as noise, particulate matter in the air, water or odor
pollution, or objectionable visual material.
.
4.
Industrial activity should be located in two major areas: adjacent to the harbor
and around the airport.
5. Because they are hazardous to the community and detrimental to the general
environment of the area petroleum refineries, liquified natural gas and liquified
petroleum gas facilities, energy facilities, energy plants and their associated
facilities and associated transmission facilities, as defined in Chapter 80.50
RCW, should not be permitted outside the heavy industrial use area and without
conditional use review.
6. The City should discourage the siting of incompatible uses adjacent to the
William R. Fairchild International Airport recognizing the need to coordinate
airport related uses and other existing land uses that are already established in
the vicinity.
Objectives
.1. The City will develop an industrial marine OM) zone for shoreline uses similar
to the upland industrial park OP) zone which allows for mixed commercial and
industrial uses.
.
2.
The City will establish a Harbor Study committee comprised of private and
public stakeholders in harbor uses and activities to review and revise the Harbor
83
-9-
Section 5.
Resource Management Plan. considering changes that have occurred in the past
12 years and visions that now seem possible. .
Open Space Goals, Policies, and Objectives
Goal
I.
Goal
1.
To create open space for relief within the urban landscape, to retain natural landscapes,
to preserve fish and wildlife habitat, and to provide natural corridors which connect
wildlife habitats.
Policies
1.
The City should further public interest by designating open spaces to preserve
unique or major physical features, such as marine shorelines, bluffs, ravines,
streams, wetlands, wildlife habitat and other environmentally sensitive areas
deemed of significant importance to the community.
2.
The City shall limit the use of and access to such natural areas to only that
which does not degrade the significance ofthe area and which protects the rights
of property owners.
Wooded areas serve a functional purpose in climate, noise, light, habitat, antt
pollution control and should be preserved as part of the urban landscape.
3.
4.
The City shall discourage intensive recreational uses and impervious surfaces
in sensitive open space areas.
Objectives
1. The City will develop a program of land banking, transfer of development
rights, or other innovative techniques which preserve open spaces.
To encourage the development of parks and recreational opportunities for all residents
of the City and to increase access to natural areas in a manner that minimizes impact.
Policies
1.
The City shall include all City-owned parks in its designated open spaces an~
establish development standards that discourage conversion of open spaces. WI
84
- 10-
.
2.
Development and planning of parks and recreational facilities should follow a
comprehensive service and facility plan consistent with the Capital Facilities
Element.
3. Public parks and recreational facilities should be equitably distributed
throughout the City to afford access to all residents.
4. Every effort should be made to consolidate and utilize land donated for public
use which provides common open space, public buildings, parks, and
recreational opportunities.
5. The City should preserve and maintain unique or major physical features
contained within the boundaries of City parks and recreational areas for access
and enjoyment by residents of the community.
6. The City should cooperate with the County and other jurisdictions in planning,
funding, constructing, and managing multi-purpose recreation and transportation
trails which link together various areas of the City, the Urban Growth Area, and
other areas of the County and region.
Objectives
.
1.
The City will establish standards for development of trails which minimize the
impact on designated open spaces.
2. The City will review new development for covered areas or wind screens to
allow greater use of outdoor facilities and public spaces during inclement
weather.
3. The City will support development of a public golf course.
4. The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that designates land uses.
improves public access to shorelines. abates deteriorating structures. and allows
for expanded recreational and commercial uses.
Section 6. Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby
amended by amending the Policies and Objectives section ofthe Transportation Element to read as
follows:
.
85
- 11 -
VI. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
General Comments
The intent of the Transportation Element is to define in a comprehensive manner how1raffic is to
be routed from one portion of the community to another in the most efficient, economical, and
compatible manner. The City's Circulation Plan in accordance with the Statewide National
Functional Classification System identifies the City's principal arterial streets, minor arterial streets,
and collectors with the remaining streets classified as locals (See Figure 11).
Goals, Policies, and Objectives
Goal
A. To develop a coordinated, multimodal transportation system which serves all areas of
the city and all types of users in a safe, economical, and efficient manner.
Policies
1. Pedestrian and bicycle paths, bike racks, storage facilities, drinking fountains,
and benches should be an integral part of the circulation system.
2. The safety of non-motorized modes of transportation should be a primary
consideration in the circulation system. Adequate sidewalks, crosswal}(
bikeways, and handicapped access should be provided.
3. The collector arterial streets and local access streets should serve primarily local
traffic with special emphasis on safety for pedestrian traffic.
4. A multimodal transportation center should be located in or near the downtown
core and public transportation system.
5. The City should consider securing rights to the use of air space where it may be
valuable to the community.
6. Planning for transportation services and facilities (including public 'Street~,
bikeways, pedestrian walkways, and public and private air, marine and land
transit services and facilities) shall be performed consistent with the goals and
policies of the Capital Facilities Element.
Objectives
1. The City will be an active partner in the development ofthe Olympic Discovery
Trail which passes through and along key parts of its park, street, pedestrian,
and nonmotorized transportation systems and facilities. The City's Circulation
Plan acknowledges that such a regional trail system serves many functions.
86
- 12 -
.
2.
The City will work with the property owner to assure completion of the
Waterfront Trail through the former Rayonier Mill site.
3. The City will incorporate bicycle friendly amenities including bike path
development and maintenance. signage. and storage into new transportation
facility improvements.
4. The City will encourage public streetscape improvements such as street trees.
seasonal displays. and pedestrian amenities through a comprehensive
development and maintenance plan.
Goal
B. To improve circulation patterns across and within the community.
Policies
1. Traffic flow modifications such as signalization, signing, parking restrictions,
channelization, and one-way couplets should be made before physical
alterations are made to existing streets.
.
2.
The City should divert crosstown truck traffic around the downtown area.
3. The City should facilitate the development of a crosstown truck route with
improvements which provide full access to Highway 117 to and from Highway
101 and improvements to the Lauridsen Boulevard Bridge over Peabody Creek
and the intersections of Lauridsen Boulevard at Race Street and Highway 101.
4. The City should facilitate an additional route for local crosstown traffic along
Lauridsen Boulevard across White's Creek ultimately connecting with Highway
101.
5. In association with these two proposed crosstown routes the City should require
adequate mitigation measures to reduce any negative impacts on existing land
uses, including buffer areas, pedestrian sidewalks and crossings, bikeways, and
reduced speeds.
6.
The City should facilitate the development of an alternate local crosstown route
with improvements which provide full access at Highway 101 and Highway 117
(the Tumwater Truck Route). Improvements should be made to the intersections
of Lauridsen Boulevard at Lincoln and Peabody Streets. Improvements should
be made to the Lauridsen Boulevard bridge over Peabody Creek. Improvement
should be made for the development of a crossing over White's Creek.
.
7.
Alternate local crosstown route and crosstown truck route improvements should
be given a high priority in capital facility planning.
87
- 13 -
8. The City shall coordinate with the State Department of Transportation, Clallar
County, and the Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organizatio._
transportation planning efforts. This includes recognition of SR 101 and SR
117, along with the connecting roadways of Front, Lincoln, Railroad, Oak, and
First Streets to and from the ferry landings and along Front Street and Marine
Drive and First Street between SR 101 and SR 117, as transportation facilities
of statewide significance which are declared essential public facilities under
Growth Management Act. Review of potential impacts these facilities and LOS
standards will be incorporated with future updates to the City's Comprehensive
Plan as required by the Act.
9. Traffic circulation to and from the airport and around associated industrial areas
should be improved.
10. The City should complete the arterial circulation system for westside
development.
11. New arterial streets, local access streets, and alleys should be designed and
constructed to conform to the Statewide National Functional Classification
System for Federal Aid Systems, WSDOT, and Transportation Improvement
Board minimum design standards and standards as adopted by the City.
12. Arterial street rights-of-way should be acquired by the City in advance ofthf
time of development in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan's Circulation
Plan Map.
13. Principal, minor, and collector arterial streets should be located on the edge of
district boundaries wherever possible.
14. Off-street parking should be sufficient and accessible within business and
residential areas to ensure that the traffic flow of the street is not impaired.
15. Road improvements should provide for alternate modes of transportation.
16. Parking requirements should make allowances for shared parking facilities.
17. The City should assist the public transit system by providing convenient access
between neighborhoods, residential, commercial, and industrial areas and
between major community facilities.
18. Police and fire protection should be a key factor in residential subdivision street
designs and circulation patterns.
19. . The development of the City's comprehensive service and facilities plan for
streets, bikeways, pedestrian walkways, and the overall transportation system,
and regional transportation plans should all be consistent. These plans, as
adopted and hereafter amended, are incorporated herein.
88
- 14 -
Objectives
1. Secondary and primary arterials will be designed with an appropriate
balance for moving through traffic and providing local access to Uses
that front on these arterials. In commercially zoned areas, policies for
consolidating access and providing for joint access and maintenance of
driveways would be considered.
2. The City will develop a variety of funding techniques available for new
development projects to provide mitigation for transportation impacts
resulting from new development or redevelopment. The funding
techniques could include but are not limited to developer provided right-
of-way and partial improvement to the street along the frontage oftheir
property, establishing a road development or trip end fee, use of
latecomers agreements, waivers of protest to the formation of LID's and
bonding. The intent would be to match the technique to the
development circumstance in order for the City to fund the
transportation improvements that ensure concurrency. Whichever
approaches are taken, they must be equitable and proportional to the
level of impact.
3. The City will develop road improvement design standards which will
include accommodation for pedestrians and non-motorized
transportation. Pedestrian facilities design will be appropriate for the
safety, volume and character of non-motorized/pedestrian traffic in each
neighborhood or district.
4. The City will phase the implementation ofthe alternate local crosstown
route and crosstown truck route in a west to east progression.
5. A study to evaluate options for easterly access across Whites and Ennis
Creeks in the vicinity of Golf Course Road will be prepared.
6. The City will consider a variety of traffic management alternatives to
increase the existing street system capacity and implement appropriate
options as feasible. Such alternatives may include:
a. Remove parking at controlled intersections to provide auxiliary
turn lanes to increase capacity;
b. Remove parking during selected periods of the day (i.e., noon
and PM peak hour) to create additional through land capacity;
c. Modify signal timing to respond to seasonal and/or daily peak
traffic periods to favor major flows and expand the number of
signals that are coordinated as part of a system.
89
- 15 -
7. The City will coordinate with the County, RTPO, and State and Fed
agencies in the study of a possible future US 101 corridor including l.J~~
Heart of the Hills Parkway and Coastal Corridor concepts. East of Race
Street, the alternate local crosstown route (along Lauridsen Boulevard)
will not be considered as a future US 101 corridor.
8. The City will implement street improvements planned to provide access
to and improve circulation around the south side of the airport along
Lauridsen Boulevard and Airport Road and the west side of the airport
along Milwaukee Drive to Lower Elwha Road.
9. The City will establish a task force to develop a City-wide bikeway
master plan.
N The City will update transDortation policies to refocus circulation
patterns. street improvements. essential state highways. truck routing. and
traffic controls throughout the City.
Section 7. Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby
amended by amending the Policies and Objectives section of the Capital Facilities Element to read
as follows:
IX. CONSERVATION ELEMENT
General Comments
The Conservation Element establishes the importance of quality of life to the people of Port
Angeles. A clean, healthy, and diverse natural environment along with a variety of historical and
cultural amenities are critical elements of a high quality community.
Goals, Policies, and Objectives
Goal
A. To create and maintain a community with a high quality of life where the land is used
in a manner that is compatible with the area's unique physical features, its natural,
historical, archaeological, and cultural amenities, and the overall environment.
Policies
I. The City should require all development, including the location and design of
all structures and open space areas, to be compatible with the unique physical
features and natural amenities of the land and complement the environment in
which it is placed, while recognizing the rights of private ownership.
90
- 16 -
2. The City should promote compatibility between the land and its use by
regulating the intensity of the land use.
3. The City should adopt development criteria which promote the use of innovative
design techniques to provide for the use of the land in a manner compatible with
any unique physical features or valuable natural, historical, and/or cultural
amenities.
Goal
B. To protect and enhance the area's unique physical features, its natural, historical,
archaeological, and cultural amenities, and the overall environment.
Policies
1. The City should further the public interest by protecting and enhancing the
area's unique physical features, valuable natural historical, archaeological, and
cultural amenities, and the overall environment, while recognizing the rights of
private ownership.
2. The City should maintain and preserve its unique physical features and natural
amenities, such as creeks, streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands, ravines, bluffs,
shorelines, and fish and wildlife habitats.
3. The City should protect and enhance the characteristics of its unique residential
neighborhoods.
4. Building density should decrease as natural constraints increase.
5. The City shall establish minimum standards for development of properties
which contain or adjoin critical areas for the purpose of protecting such areas
and enhancing their natural functions.
6. The City should regulate site design, preparation, and development to avoid or
minimize damage to wetlands and other environmentally sensitive areas.
7. Recognizing the functions and values of wetlands, the City should strive to
achieve no net loss of wetlands.
8. The City should preserve uniquely featured lands which still exist in their
natural states and which are notable for their aesthetic, scenic, historic, or
ecological features and should prohibit any private or public development which
would destroy such qualities, while recognizing the rights of private ownership.
9. The City should promote public access to the shoreline, while preserving a
healthy shoreline environment.
91
- 17 -
10. The City should enhance and preserve the quality of its air and water as two <-
its unique physical features.
11. The City should protect its air and water quality by minimizing potential new
pollution from new and existing sources.
12. The City shall develop and implement a plan to improve water quality which
includes measures to reduce and minimize stormwater pollutants and combined
sewer overflow pollutant discharges.
13. The City should use regionally consistent requirements for industrial and
commercial sewer discharge pretreatment and require new indirect dischargers
to locate where appropriate sewer service can be made available.
14. The City should maintain and enhance the quality of water resources through the
regulation of clearing, grading, dumping, discharging, and draining and the
provision of flood and erosion control measures and regulations to protect
wetlands and other environmentally sensitive areas.
15. Through the retention of existing vegetation, the City should protect water
quality and prevent erosion.
16. The City should designate open space areas to preserve maj or or unique physica I
features and/or to serve as natural greenbelts and wildlife corridors. "
17. The City should identify and preserve significant public scenic view corridors.
18. The City should encourage identification, preservation, and restoration of sites
and structures that have historical or cultural significance.
19. The City should give precedence to long-term environmental impacts and .
benefits over short-term environmental impacts and benefits.
20. The City should promote and utilize environment enhancing conservation
practices such as waste recycling and energy conservation and should encourage
the development and use of alternative forms of energy and transportation.
21. The City should coordinate its environmental regulations with County, State,
and Federal regulations to simplify the permitting process and to reduce
associated costs to the land user.
Objectives
1. The City will work closely with State agencies on further development
of regulations and coordinated enforcement of air quality standards.
92
- 18 -
.
2.
The City will adopt and enforce adequate regulations designed to
maintain and enhance water quality.
3. The City will identify and implement site specific requirements for
individual development proposals to mitigate any negative impacts
created by the development, particularly to an area identified as an
environmentally sensitive area.
4. The City will adopt and enforce regulations which require all new
development to provide adequate stormwater retention/detention
facilities necessary to protect water quality.
5. The City will complete an inventory and identification of areas
identified as Habitats of Local Importance to assure that important
habitat connections are not severed.
6. The City will complete an inventory and identification of wetlands.
7. The City will encourage clustering of residential development where
necessary to protect environmentally sensitive areas, or to avoid
hazardous areas, or to preserve open space areas.
.
8.
The City will develop a stormwater management Plan.
9. The City will develop guidelines to evaluate new development that
occurs near scemc resources.
10. The City will establish regulations that allow the preservation of
identified historically significant buildings/sites.
11. The City will participate in various watershed planning and salmon
recovery efforts. The City will incorporate appropriate measures for the
protection of habitat for listed or threatened species under the Federal
Endangered Species Act when providing public services and
administering land use and development regulations.
Goal
C. To promote community awareness of the importance of environmental, historical and
cultural amenities, the responsible use of such resources, and the use of the land with
minimal impact on its unique physical features, its natural, historical and cultural
amenities, and the overall environment.
Policies
.
1.
The City should inform the public concerning the long-term benefits of
protecting and improving the quality of the region's air, land, and water.
93
- 19-
Goal
2.
The City should encourage the development and implementation .
environmental, historical, and cultural awareness programs which focus on loc
and regional issues.
D. To preserve and enhance the City's shoreline, its natural landscape, and flora and fauna
and to minimize conflicts with present and planned uses in a manner consistent with the
State Shoreline Management Act.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Policies
1.
Shoreline areas should be preserved for future generations by restricting or
prohibiting development that would interfere with the shoreline ecology or
irretrievably damage shoreline resources.
2.
Where possible, riparian vegetation in shoreline areas and on tributary streams
which affect shoreline resources should be maintained and restored.
3.
Where possible, techniques to rehabitate degraded shorelines for the purpose of
shoreline stabilization and habitat enhancement should be employed.
4.
Where possible, aquatic habitats including shellfish habitat, and importae
marine vegetation should be preserved and protected.
5.
Development patterns and densities on lands adjacent to shorelines should be
compatible with shoreline uses and resources and reinforce the policies of the
Shoreline Management Act and the City's Shoreline Master Program.
Where possible, urban service facilities located in shoreline areas should utilize
common utility corridors.
Adequate shoreline area for water-oriented commercial and industrial
development should be designated based on the Land Use Element.
Shoreline uses and activities should be located to avoid environmentally
sensitive and ecologically valuable areas and to insure the preservation and
protection of shoreline natural areas and resources.
Where possible, utility facilities and rights-of-way should be located outside of
the shoreline area.
Shoreline ecology and resources should be protected when locating utilities i.
shoreline areas.
94
- 20-
.
Objective
1. The City will develop a Shoreline Master Program that is consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan and the Shoreline Management Act.
2. The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that designates land
uses. improves public access to shorelines. abates deteriorating
structures. and allows for expanded recreational and commercial uses.
Section 8. Ordinance 2818 as amended and the Comprehensive Plan are hereby
amended by amending the Policies and Objectives section of the Capital Facilities Element to read
as follows:
x. CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT
General Comments
.
The Capital Facilities Element consists oftwo parts. The first part is the listing of goals and policies
regarding the City's provision of urban services and its planning of capital improvements. The
second part is the Annual Capital Facilities Plan which is adopted separately from the
Comprehensive Plan but is included as part of the Plan as an attachment.
The Comprehensive Plan defines urban services in its definition section which includes a listing of
the following services and facilities which should be available in an urban environment:
* Surface transportation facilities;
* Water facilities;
* Sewer facilities;
* Stormwater facilities;
* Solid waste facilities;
* Parks and recreational facilities;
* Emergency services (police, fire and medical response);
* Public service buildings;
* Public schools facilities; and
* Regional facilities (libraries, corrections, and mass transit).
The following goals and policies provide guidance on how these services and facilities should be
provided. This includes the establishment of minimum levels of service standards for each service.
The policies also call for the development of individual comprehensive service and facility plans
which take an in-depth look at the current status of each service and the projected future demand for
each service and which include a financial feasibility analysis on the costs of providing each service.
.
The Capital Facilities Plan is a six-year plan which establishes how, where, and when the City will
develop the facilities necessary to provide its various services.
- 21 -
95
Goals, Policies, and Objectives
Goal
A. To provide and maintain safe and financially feasible urban services and -capital
facilities at or above stated levels of service to all City residents and the general public.
Policies
1. The Comprehensive Plan shall establish general level of service standards for
each urban utility and service. Such standards shall be used to determine the
impacts of development.
2. I The City should, at a minimum, ensure the continuation of established level of
service standards for all urban utilities and services to the extent and in the
manner provided herein.
3. The City shall develop individual comprehensive service and facility plans for
the following utilities and/or services:
*
*
*
*
*
*
streets, bikeways and pedestrian walkways,
water system,
sanitary sewer system,
electrical system,
parks and recreation services, and
emergency services (police, fire, and medical response).
4. The City should co-operate with the appropriate private and/or public agencies
to develop individual comprehensive service and facility plans for each of the
following utilities and/or services:
*
*
*
*
telecommunications,
schools,
transportation (air, marine and public transit), and
solid waste collection and disposal.
5. Comprehensive service and facility plans shall be consistent with the general
level of service standards established in the Comprehensive Plan and shall
establish detailed level of service standards which, at a minimum, meet all local,
state and federal health and safety requirements. Each plan may also establish
desired level of service standards and shall include an inventory of current
facilities, measurements of current and future service capacities, the
determination offuture service and facility improvements necessary to serve the;
twenty year vision of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, and a financial
feasibility analysis.
96
- 22-
.
6.
The comprehensive service and facility plan for streets, bikeways, and
pedestrian walkways shall also include specific actions and requirements for
bringing into compliance any street facilities that fall below the required level
of service, including demand management strategies which encourage reduced
reliance on single occupant vehicle trips and encourage use of alternate modes
of transportation such as the bicycles, walkways, and transit riding with
incentive programs for and from local businesses.
7. The comprehensive service and facilities plan for streets, bikeways, and
pedestrian walkways should include a future US 101 corridor to meet long-term
local and regional transportation needs.
8. Each comprehensive service and facility plan shall be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, the County-Wide Planning Policy, and the State Growth
Management Act.
9. The City shall require concurrency at the time of development for the following
utilities and services:
.
*
*
*
*
streets,
water service,
sanitary sewer service, and
electrical service.
10. The City should require the following utilities and services at the time of
development:
*
*
*
*
solid waste collection,
stormwater management,
telecommunications service, and
emergency services (police, fire and emergency medical response).
11. The City should require the following services and facilities within six years
from the time of development:
*
*
parks and recreation services and facilities, and
transit system.
12. The City shall adopt an annual Capital Facilities Plan consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and State Growth Management Act. The Capital Facilities
Plan's financing schedule may be corrected, updated, or modified without being
considered as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, following a public
hearing before the City Council.
.
13.
If projected funding fails for a capital project listed as funded in the City's
approved Capital Facilities Plan and development permits have been issued'
reliant upon that capital project for concurrency, the City shall take necessary
97
- 23-
actions to minimize further degradation ofthe impacted service or facility. Th.'
may include one or any combination of the following actions:
a) reduce the level of service standard,
b) increase funding by increasing revenues,
c) reduce demand by revising the Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Map and/or Zoning Map, and/or
d) reduce demand by reducing consumption (i.e., conservation).
Objectives
1. At the time Comprehensive Plans for the City and County are reviewed,
one representative each from the Port Angeles School District No. 121,
Clallam County, and the City of Port Angeles will meet to consider
possible recommendations for amendment of policies affecting school
facilities.
2. The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated on an annual basis and
should implement the goals, policies, and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan.
3. The City will develop a schedule for preparation and adoption of each
required comprehensive service and facilities plan. .
4. The City will study the development of a seasonal or permanent ice
skating rink facility.
.2.. The City will establish a review process with a more comprehensive
analysis of Capital facilities Plan proiects to addres's new mandates for
environmental protection such as the Endangered species Act. extension
of urban services into the Urban Growth Area and new residential areas
within the City. and preservation and maintenance of service levels
impacted by changes such as the Elwha Dam removal. landfill closure.
and aging facilities.
Goal
B. To provide urban streets and utilities at minimum levels of service for all city residents
and the general public.
Policies
1.
All arterial streets shall function at an average daily level of service of D or
better.
Development on all arterial streets and any other streets identified as SChOO.
walking routes shall include pedestrian sidewalks.
2.
98
- 24-
.
3.
The City shall not approve any development that is not served with water
service at or greater than the following level of service standards at the time of
development:
Single family units: 2 gallons per minute @ 30 psi
(fire-I 000 gallons per minute @ 20 psi)
Multi-family units: I gallon per minute @ 30 psi
(fire per Uniform Fire Code)
Commercial: per Uniform Fire Code
Industrial: per Uniform Fire Code
4. The City shall not approve any development that is not served with sewer
service at or greater than a level of service standard of 300 gallons per day per
person at the time of development.
5. The City shall not approve any development that is not served with electrical
service at or greater than a level of service standard of 118 volts (120 volt base)
at the time of development.
.
6.
The City should not approve any development that increases a site's post-
development stormwater run-off beyond that allowed by the Stormwater
Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin as adopted by the City.
7. The City should not approve any development that cannot be served with
telecommunications service at or greater than the following level of service
standards at the time of development:
. Telephone
Residential:
I service per unit
Commercial: I service per business
Industrial: 1 service per business
Cable Television
Residential:
I service per unit
Commercial: 0 service per business
Industrial: 0 service per business
.
Objective
I. The City will develop and adopt design standards for street, water,
sewer, and stormwater facilities.
99 - 25 -
Goal
c.
.
To provide urban services at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the
general public.
Policies
1. The Port Angeles School District should develop a capital facilities plan, which
the City will consider for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan. The capital
facilities plan should contain at least a six-year plan for public financing of such
facilities as may be necessary to provide adequate public schools at or greater
than the following level of service standards in order to meet anticipated
increases in student enrollment, which may be anticipated based on the School
District's projected enrollment figures and residential growth as provided for in
the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan:
High School:
125 square feet of permanent, appropriate
educational space per student,
Middle School:
104 square feet of permanent, appropriate
educational space per student, and
Elementary School:
100 square feet of permanent, appropriate
educational space per student.
If capacity is inadequate to house students at the established level of service
standards (LOS) and adequate school funding is not available, then the demand
for new facilities will be reduced (e.g. through year round use of schools or by
matching grade band enrollment to facility capacities) or the level of service
standards will be reduced to keep both schools and housing development
affordable to the majority of Port Angeles School District residents. Imposition
of Growth Management Act impact fees on or denial of new development will
not be used as a measure to prevent further degradation of school services,
unless the reduced level of service standards are deemed unacceptable to Port
Angeles School District No. 121, Clallam County, and the City of Port Angeles.
2. The City should not approve any development that will not be served wi'th
adequate transit service as determined in the comprehensive service and
facilities plan for transportation within six years from the time of development.
3. The City should not approve any development that will not be served at or
greater than a city-wide level of service standard of 9 acres of parks per 1,000
population within six years from the time of development.
4. The City should not approve any development that will not be served at or lese
than the following level of service standards at the time of development.
1 00 -26-
.
Police:
677 persons per one officer
Fire:
4 minute response time or residential sprinkler system
installation
5. The City should not approve any development that will not be served with solid
waste collection service at or less than a city-wide level of service standard of
400 pick up accounts per 1000 population within six years from the time of
development.
6. The City shall participate \\!ith the County in the development, maintenance, and
implementation of a regional solid waste plan which addresses collection,
disposal, and recycling of solid waste.
7. The City should consider the cumulative effect of development on tbe City's
need for adequate public service buildings.
Goal
D. To participate with the County, State, and Federal governments as well as otber public
agencies to provide adequate regional public services.
Policies
1. The City should cooperate with the County and the community's health care
providers to ensure quality health care facilities within the City that serve the
region as a whole.
2. The City should cooperate with the County in planning regional library facilities
within the City.
3. The City should cooperate with the County in planning for adequate correctional
facilities.
4. Essential public facilities of a county-wide or state-wide nature must meet
existing state laws and regulations requiring specific siting and permit
requirements consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Objective
I. The City will revise its development regulations as necessary to preserve
the right-of-way within an identified US 101 corridor.
Section 9. The Comprehensive Plan amendments set forth in this Ordinance shall be
incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan as kept on file with the City Clerk.
__10 1 - 27 -
Section 10. Severability. If any provisions ofthis Ordinance, or its application to anv
person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, or application of tht:
provisions of the Ordinance to other persons o~ circumstances, is not affected.
Section 11 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after the date-of
publication by summary.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the _ day of June, 2002.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED: June 23. 2002
By Summary
F IORDINANCES&RESOLUTlONS\2002-12 ord.wpd
June 13,2002
1 0 2'; 28 -
Y OF PORT ANGELES
PUBLIC WORKS
~
o
I
Plot Dote 06/13/02
SCALE
I
500
1000
I
PLANNING AREA MAP
Exhibit II A"
RevIsion Dote 06/13/02
File CDr'-1_PLN -4-
F'
.
~
.
.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES SCALE
PUBLIC WORKS
~ 0 1000
I I I
500
L Plot Do. te' 05/02/02
'1
,
nl :
{~ I : '
I I I I
I I
I~ i'
I~i~ i
\' I I
\ll I
"AI I
\,
: I
\ I
\ '
't V
1
~)
PLANNING AREA MAP
Exhibit "B"
Revision Do. te 05/02/02
Flle:COM_PLN ...d
w
SCALE
~
c-1
!
PLANNING AREA
MAP
Y OF PORT ANGELES
PUBLIC WORKS
~ 0
~ I
Plot Do te 06/13/02
3600
I I
7800
Exhibit "e"
ReVISion Do te 06/13/02
-
-
II .
i - g
II II
. 'i: a.
E 'I en
E :I C
8 'a .
C a.
- 0
, I D
,
,
.I
,
'i
-
..
'i c -
. II
;: 'a -
..
C .. c::
. .I CD
'a 'a
'; ..
.I ~ .
.. ~
~ C ~
.. . -
a .
c E c
& .
:I a
I i I:
. at
... :I -
:z:
File:CDM_PLN 4-
2.
~.~~. -
.~.
", ,
; sr ;- <~ '~
~~__,,!::f'~'"7'''~..,a i'"'.;";'~ ....,
'-fj'
/~ ,-~
r' 1:;'
~ ".-.
, ',/<
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF 2002 COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AMENDMENTS - CPA 02-01:
,-.
FINDINGS:
-',
-,~
1.
"
The State LegislatUre mandated that cities and counties subject to the Growth '" -
Management Act cprilplete a comprehensive review of the Comprehensive Plan ~y :;
September 2002 and in the Spring 2002 changed the deadline for this updat~: to 2004 ":'
for the City of Port Angeles.
The City started its comprehensive update ofthe,Comp Plan in the Fall 2001 and
focused ~tten.tjon o~ the Harbor Planning Area,> including Downtown and the
Rayonier Mill site. .
3.
, - ~ -
The Planning Commission has held numerous infomial public meetings starting in
November 2001 through March 2002.
,
..'
4.
Many of public agency and private property stakeholders in the Harbor and '
Downtown -areas have participated and made s"Qggestions and comments regarding
amendments to the Comprehensive Plap initially adopted by the City in Jun~ 1994 in ';'
compliance with the ,9rowth Management Act.
,(
.
5.
The Department of Community Development staff prepared twelve applications for
Comprehensive Plan changes by March 31, 2002, expanding, particularly the Comp
Plan objectives to hlcorporate projects and land use actions that the Harbor and
Downtown stakeholders want to see happen in the next five y~ars.
\ ( ~ ~
....' "
':;~ '
6. One of the twelve applications was the proposed utility extension policy change for
services outside the City limits, and, despite the recent State Supreme Court decision
nullifying the petition method of annexation on which the utility extension policy
was based, the City has elected to withdraw consideration of that proposed
amendment.
7. The eleven i~maining proposals resulted in 13 additional Land Use Elemenfpolicies
and objectives, 4 additional Transportation Element objectives, 1 additional '.
Conservation Element objective, 2 additional Capital Facilities Element objectives,
and 3 proposed Land Use Map changes.
8.
The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed for the proposed Comprehensive Plan
Amendments, and the most relevant goals, policies, and objectives included, but
were not limit~d to, Growth Management Element Goal A, Policy A(1)(a-m), Goal
B, Land Use Element Goals D, F, H, and J, Transportation Element Goals A and B,
Conservation Element Goal D, and Capital Facilities Element Goal A.
.
106
.
9.
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map was reviewed relative to land use changes
that may be necessary for planned development and redevelopment along the Harbor
shoreline. The City has endorsed the Rayonier Mill Site Draft Remedial
Investigation Plan, which will provide sampling data and analysis needed for site
cleanup and redevelopment.
10. A primary purpose of the proposed Comp Plan Amendments CPA 02-01 is to
improve the Plan as a planning tool for facilitating the desired urban design of the
City and encourage growth that the community wants to take place in the next five
years.
11. A series of formal public hearings on the proposed Comp Plan Amendments began
on May 8, 2001 and are scheduled through June 4, 2002.
12. Updates of other planning areas in the Comp Plan over the next two years, focusing
on the east side next year and the west side the following year, is scheduled for
completing the City's Comprehensive Plan update by the 2004 deadline. The next
Comprehensive Plan review under the Growth Management Act will be due 2011.
.
.
13.
P AMC 18.04 Comprehensive Plan Implementation and Amendment sets forth
procedures for annual amendment which include deadlines for applications,
requirements for public hearings, deadlines for decisions and criteria for applications
and approvals of amendments. Proposed amendments shall demonstrate: why
existing provisions should not continue, consistency with the Growth Management
Act goals and specific requirements, compliance with County-Wide Planning Policy,
compliance with capital facilities and related plans, why it is in the public interest,
consistency with public health, safety, and welfare, and consideration of the
cumulative effects of the amendments.
14. The proposed amendments were sent to the State Office of Community Development
(OCD), affected property owners and businesses in the Harbor Planning Area, Port of
Port Angeles, Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, Clallam County, and other City
Departments for review.
15. Two written comments have been received, one from Mr. Edward A. Chadd and one
from the Port of Port Angeles.
16.
On May 22, 2002, the City's SEP A Responsible Official issued a Determination of
Non-Significance (DNS) #981 and adopted the existing FEIS for the City's
Comprehensive Plan (August 6, 1993), the Addendum to the FEIS for the City's
Comprehensive Plan (June 14, 1994), and FSEIS to the City's Comprehensive Plan
for the Zoning Implementation (November 14, 1995).
107
17.
The Planning Commission held public hearings on the proposed Comprehensive
Plan Amendments CPA 02-01 on May 8 and May 22,2002, and the City Council
held a public hearing on CPA 02-01 for June 4, 2002.
.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The City has reviewed its Comprehensive Plan and proposed updates in compliance
with the Growth Management Act, the OCD grant received by the City for the
mandated review, and the State Legislature's review deadline of September 2002.
2. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments are consistent with the Port
Angeles Comprehensive Plan, in particular with the most relevant goals, policies,
and objectives including, but were not limited to, Growth Management Element Goal
A, Policy A(I)(a-m), Goal B, Land Use Element Goals D, F, H, and J, Transportation
Element Goals A and B, Conservation Element Goal D, and Capital Facilities
Element Goal A.
3.
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map proposed changes will facilitate planned
development and redevelopment along the Harbor shoreline. Any redesignation of
the Rayonier Mill Site should wait until work under the Draft Remedial Investigation
Plan, which will provide sampling data and analysis needed for site cleanup and
redevelopment, has been provided to the City of Port Angeles.
.
4. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments are consistent with the P AMC
18.04 Comprehensive Plan Implementation and Amendment procedures for annual
amendment which include deadlines for applications, requirements for public
hearings, deadlines for decisions and criteria for applications and approvals of
amendments.
5. The proposed amendments are consistent with the Clallam County-Wide Planning
Policy, in compliance with the City's capital facilities and related plans, and
consistency with public health, safety, and welfare.
6. Consideration of the cumulative effects of the proposed amendments based on the
City's Capital Facilities Plan and compliance with the State Environmental Policy
Act through adoption ofthe existing FEIS for the City's Comprehensive Plan
(August 6, 1993), the Addendum to the FEIS for the City's Comprehensive Plan
(June 14, 1994), and FSEIS to the City's Comprehensive Plan for the Zoning
Implementation (November 14, 1995) determined there were no significant adverse
environmental impacts.
.
108
.
7.
The proposed Comp Plan Amendments CPA 02-01 are in the public interest and will
improve the Plan as a planning tool for facilitating the desired urban design of the
City and encourage growth that the community wants to take place in the next five
years.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of June 17,2002.
Glenn Wiggins, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
.
.
109
Planmng CommISSIOn Mmutes
May 22, 2002
PUBLIC HEARING:
.
2002 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Proposed
annual amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Director Collins described corrections to the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Map copies that
were sent to Commissioners for review. Corrections were proposed extending the commercial zone
further east from Lincoln Street to include property along the shoreline owned by Jack Glaubert and
Jerry Austin east ofthe Red Lion Inn and property west of Valley Street to Sunset Wire Rope along
Marine Drive. Chair Schramm opened the public hearing.
Jack Anderson Environmental and Site Manager for Rayonier, 700 North Ennis Street, asked
that, on behalf of Rayqnier, issues relating to any redesignation of portions of the Rayonier site be
postponed at this time until the remedial investigation has been further evaluated and documented.
Sampling of materials will be done later in 2002 and it is hoped that the results of that testing will
be available by early 2003.
In response to Commissioner Hewins, Mr. Anderson answered that he cannot guarantee that the
sampling work and report will be available and submitted to the City by March, 2003. It is not
possible given the number of agencies involved to assure that time frame. It is likely that soil
sampling will be completed and a draft report will probably be available by March, 2003, but he .
doubted the final report will have been completed by that time given the review process.
In response to Commissioner Schramm, Mr. Anderson stated that the past summer's work included
the removal of the large SSL lagoon and the removal of approximately 20,000 cubic yards of solid
waste material. The dock repair has not as yet been completed but is anticipated for the near future.
Upcoming work for this summer will include the removal of petroleum contaminated soils along
Ennis Creek and in the location of an oil tank and maintenance shop.
There being no one else who wished to speak, Chair Schramm closed the public hearing.
In response to a suggestion from Commissioner Hewins, Director Collins confirmed that the
Commission should continue the Comprehensive Plan amendment application rather than assume
that a new application would be submitted for potential changes to the Rayonier site in 2003.
Commissioner Hewins asked if the City is giving up its own property, which is now designated
parking, for the Gateway project? Director Collins answered that some City property would be
incorporated into the Gateway project. Commissioner Hewins believed that some of the
Comprehensive Plan proposed objectives, specifically those dealing with the issue of no net parking
loss in the Downtown, puts the onus on the City to replace parking that was privately provided in
the past. Proposed Objective FA appears to make the City responsible to replace displaced parking.
Director Collins noted that proposed objective FA came from a request from the Port Angeles
Downtown Association (P ADA). It appears that the objective would hold the City responsible for
maintaining no net loss of parking.
.
110
.
.
.
Plannmg CommISSIOn Mmutes
May 22, 2002
Page 3
Mr. Collins clarified that the P ADA is interested in the City replacing parking as a result of the
Gateway project. Commissioner Schramm concurred that the proposed objective only deals with
that parking that would be displaced by the Gateway project in the Downtown. Commissioner
Hewins did not agree that the City should be obligated to replace parking displaced by the Gateway
project - a private developer would not be so charged. Director Collins did not disagree and
explained that the language was developed at the suggestion of stakeholders in the Downtown area
as represented by the P ADA. Adoption of the proposed objective would in fact make the City
promise to replace the displaced parking where at present the City is negotiating to do so.
Commissioner Hewins did not agree that an objective should be proposed supporting an ice skating
rink in the Downtown. Director Collins noted that the proposed objective wording does not commit
but indicates that the City will study such a use in the Downtown. Commissioners Rasmussen and
Hewins agreed that these types of specific issues do not need to be included in the Comprehensive
Plan but should go the normal route for review prior to support. Mr. Collins noted that the use is
being considered at the request of the Chamber of Commerce and a City Councilperson. If the
Planning Commission does not agree with the specifics of certain objectives, those objections should
be noted in the Commission's recommendation to the City Council. Commissioner Schramm stated
that his review of the proposed objectives to the Comprehensive Plan was under the assumption that
the objectives would undergo varying degrees of interpretation but basically would not commit any
public monies or commit public participation to specific projects. Director Collins agreed and
further responded that the expenditure of Capital Facility funds and decisions that are made in the
future by the Planning Commission and City Council are directed by the goals, policies, and
objectives listed in the Comprehensive Plan. Projects that are specifically listed or addressed in the
Comprehensive Plan will be given a higher priority than those that are not specifically noted.
Commissioner Rasmussen wondered if it should be made clear in the Plan that the City is not
committing or implying a specific position or financial support of certain projects by listing those
projects. Director Collins responded that those decisions would be up to City officials who would
be approving specific projects. An objective is a proposal in the Comprehensive Plan that is a type
of promise that something will be done. If objectives are not met, they should be removed from the
Plan.
Director Collins explained the proposed policy for the City to consider the vacation of certain alleys
or streets to achieve a desired urban design for the City. The proposed policy is to recognize that,
in commercial areas, the City is interested in allowing the assembling of land in order to achieve the
type of development that is desired. Such a policy would be mainly to assist in the development of
properties that are separated by a right-of-way and owned by the same owner.
Commissioner Hewins stated that he has a definite problem with identifying a specific use such as
a proposed ice skating rink in the Downtown as part of the Comprehensive Plan amendments. He
did not believe that singling out a particular use is appropriate just because it is suggested by a
certain group. He also objected to the proposal (Item #7 ofthe Port Angeles Downtown Association
and Chamber of Commerce proposals) that indicates" The City will develop various parking options
including the construction of a parking structure... to mitigate parking impacts from the Gateway
Project to achieve no net loss of parking..." being in the Comprehensive Plan. Such negotiation
should not be part ofthe Comprehensive Plan but should be part of other negotiations. This puts the
111
Planlllllg CommiSSIOn A11l1Ules
May 22, 2002
Page 4
responsibility on the City, and not all parking belongs to the City. Additional bicycle friendly
objectives are redundant as there are already many references in the Comprehensive Plan stating the
City's intentions to provide non motorized opportunities when possible. In general, he believed that
most of the proposals that were fOD1mlated from a letter from the Downtown Association are not
appropriate nor need to be mcluded in the Plan. Approval of a commercial objective to support a
waterfront promenade along Railroad Avenue wIll result in the loss of either street, sidewalk, or
water area if developed.
It was decided that a pon should be taken on each policy, objective, and map change to determine
the Commission's recommendations on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. The
May 22,2002, staff report was reviewed item by item with each item being voted upon individually:
L:md Use Element
Add new Commerci~1 Policy D(3) -- The City should vacate rights-ol-way to facilitate retention
of existing businesses and location of new busznesses where land assembly is necessal)J to achieve
the desIred urban design of the City. '
Commissioner Rasmussen objected to the proposal because he did not believe it is necessary
to include these type of actions within the Plan itselfbut should be handled separately. The
Commission agreed 4 - 1 to recommend approval of the proposal with Commissioner
Hewins voting against.
Add new Commercial Objective D(1) -- The City will work with the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe
to develop a cultural center and marina for large pleasure boats located in Port Angeles Harbor.
Commissioner Porter had no real objections to the proposal but was not sure there is a real
need for such a development. The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the
proposal.
Add new Commercial Objective D(2) -- The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that
designates land uses, improves public access to shorelines, abates deteriorating structures, and
allows for expanded recreational and commercial uses.
Commissioner Rasmussen noted that this objective is repeated in Open Space Objective J(4)
and Conservation Element D(2). He suggested the polling be taken as a group. The
Commission agreed to recommend approval of the three proposals 5 - O.
Add new Commercial Policy F(4) -- The City should work with the Port Angeles Downtown
Association to develop urban design review guidelines that facilitate architectural elements/features
which will encourage complimentalY and aesthetically pleasing new development in the Central
Business District (CBD).
Commissioner Hewins was opposed to the policy. It is not appropriate for the City to set
urban design guidelines but should be up to the business owners and groups as a whole to
112
.
.
.
Plannzng CommlsslOll Minutes
May 22. 2002
Page 5
collectively agree on design issues. Commissioner Rasmussen thought that if design review
guidelines are to be established for aesthetically pleasing development it should not be
restricted to the Downtown. The concept should be broadened. Director Collins noted that
the Downtown has tended to take the lead on these types of issues. Such policies could be
expanded to other areas of the City if there is interest. The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to
recommend approval of the policy.
Add new Commercial Objective F(1) -- The City will assist the Chamber of Commerce and the
Port Angeles Downtown Association in developing an historic underground walking tour activity
focused on Laurel Street.
Commissioner Hewins was opposed to the objective. The Commission agreed 4 - 1 to
recommend approval of the objective with Commissioner Hewins voting against.
Add new Commercial Objective F(2) -- The City will assist the Chamber of Commerce and the
Port Angeles Downtown Association in developing a waterfront promenade along the Downtown
waterfront.
Commissioner Hewins objected for reasons previously stated. Commissioner Rasmussen
agreed with Commissioner Hewins' previous statement that such an objective would result
in the loss of either street, sidewalk, or water areas. The Commission agreed 3 - 2 to
recommend approval of the objective with Commissioners Hewins and Rasmussen voting
against.
Add new Commercial Objective F(3) -- The City will encourage community events such as holiday
ceremonies, town gatherings, arts and crafts displays, and special business activities such as a
Farmers'Market during the tourist season, particularly in the Downtown area and on Laurel Street.
Commissioner Hewins would have no problem with the objective if the words "...area and
on Laurel Street" were removed. He was concerned that such activities would specifically
be focused on Laurel Street. He did not understand whether the City is looking at promoting
tourism on public property with no remuneration as opposed to encouraging the use of
properties in general where private properties could be generating income from the activities
rather than use of the City right-of-way with no remuneration. He had no objection to
Downtown area uses in general. The Commission agreed 4 - 1 to recommend approval of the
objective with Commissioner Hewins voting against.
Add new Commercial Objective F(4) -- The City will develop various parking options including
the construction of a parking structure and the purchase of surface parking lot(s) to mitigate parking
impacts from the Gateway Project to achieve no net loss of parking for customer parking, City
permit parking, and long term parking.
Commissioner Hewins felt that the proposed wording appears to bind the City's hands in
future negotiations. It was proposed to change the wording to read "The City will consider
dcv-clop various parking options including thc construction of 8. parking structurc l:lfid the
113
Planning CommissIOn Minutes
May 22, 2002
Page 6
purchase of surface parking ]ot(s) to mitigate parking impacts from the Gateway Project t6 .
achieve no net loss of parking for customer parking, City permit parking, and long term
parking. The Commission agreed 4 - 1 to recommend approval of the objective as modified
with Commissioner Hewins voting against.
Add new Industrial Objective H(1) -- The City will develop an industrial marine (1M) zone for
shoreline uses similar to the upland industrial park (IP) zone which allows for mixed commercial
and industrial uses
The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective.
Add new Industrial Objective H(2) -- The City will establish a Harbor Study committee comprised
of private and public stakeholders in harbor uses and activities to reveiw and revise the Harbor
Resource Management Plan, considering changes that have occurred in the past 12 years and
visions that now seem possible.
The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective
Add new Open Space Objective J(2) -- The City will review new development for covered areas
or wind screens to allow greater use of outdoor facilities and public spaces during inclement
weather.
Director Collins noted that the proposals will be forwarded to the City Council as written with a
recommendation from the Planning Commission and, in some cases, a second recommendation from
staff. In response to Commissioner Porter as to why two different proposals might be forwarded,
Director Collins noted that staff may feel the need to forward an alternate recommendation.
.
Commissioner Hewins asked how the review of new development for covered areas or wind
screens fits with land use decisions the City is charged to regulate. He believed that these
types of requirements should be up to individual business owners and not under the
jurisdiction or review of the City. The Commission agreetj 4 - 1 to recommend approval of
the objectivewith Commissioner Hewins voting against.
Add new Open Space Objective J(3) -- The City will work with the Port of Port Angeles in the
development of a public golf course.
The wording was changed to read" The City will support work 'vvith the Port ofrort Angeles
in-the development of a public golf course" because the original wording restricts the support
to that of a Port of Port Angeles development. The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend
approval of the objective.
Add new Open Space Objective J(4) -- The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that .
designates land uses, improves public access to shorelines, abates deteriorating structures, and
allows for expanded recreational and commercial uses.
114
.
.
.
Planning CommIssIOn Mznutes
May 22. 2002
Page 7
The Commission earlier agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective.
Transportation Element
Add new Objective A(2) -- The City will work with the property owner to assure completion of the
Waterfront Trail through the former Rayonier Mill site.
The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective.
Add new Objective A(3) -- The City will incorporate bicycle friendly amenities including bike path
development and maintenance, signage, and storage into new transportation facility improvements.
The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective with reservation from
Commissioner Rasmussen due to a question as to the extent of the City's intention to provide
'--- physical amenities for nonpedestrian improvements over what is already contained in the
Plan.
Add new Objective A(4) -- The City will encourage public streetscape improvements such as street
trees, seasonal displays, and pedestrian amenities through a comprehensive development and
maintenance plan.
The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective.
Add new Objective D(2) -- The City will update transportation policies to refocus circulation
patterns, street improvements, essential state highways, truck routing, and traffic controls
throughout the City with particular attention to the Central Business District.
The original amendment wording was changed to read "The City will update transportation
policies to refocus circulation patterns, street improvements, essential state highways, truck
routing, and traffic controls throughout the City with particula-r a-ttention to thc Ccntral
Busincss District." The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend the modified wording as it
relates to the City as a whole and does not single out anyone area.
Conservation Element
Add new Objective D(2) -- The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that designates land
uses, improves public access to shorelines, abates deteriorating structures, and allows for expanded
recreational and commercial uses.
The Commission earlier agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective.
Capital Facilities Element
Add new Objective A(4) -- The City will study the development of a seasonal or permanent ice
skating rink facility.
115
Planning CommissIOn Mmutes
May 22, 2002
Page 8
The Commission agreed 3 - 2 to recommend this objective not be approved. The vote was .
Commissioners Rasmussen, Schramm, and Hewins "no", and Commissioners Philpott and
Porter 'yes".
Add new Objective A(5) -- The City will establish a review process with a more comprehensive
analysis of Capital Facilities Plan projects to address new mandates for environmental protection
such as the Endangered Species Act, extension of urban services into the Urban Growth Area and
new residential areas within the City, and needs to preserve and maintain service levels impacted
by changes such as the Elwha Dam removal, landfill closure, and aging facilities.
The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective.
Mapping changes
1) Downtown -- expansion of the commercial land use designation east along Victoria Street and
west along Marine Drive.
The Commissioners agreed 5 - 0 to the proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
changes with a revision extending the commercial zoning east of the Red Lion Inn to include
the Glaubert/Austin property and west to include the Sunset Wire Rope use on Marine Drive.
2) Ediz Hook -- expansion of the commercial land use designation east of the Sail and Paddle Park .
along the shoreline inside Port Angeles Harbor.
Commissioners Schramm voiced objection to allowing huge boathouses on Ediz Hook as
it would be a tremendous visual impairment to the landscape ofthe Hook. Such a use would
be better proposed against the bluff, say in the Rayonier area, where the use would basically
be out of sight and in a more protected area. Ediz Hook is an irreplaceable resource that
should be protected.
In response to Commissioner Porter, Director Collins answered that development of a Tribal use
would not necessarily be subject to normal state requirements for overwater development. The City
would rely on the Elwha Tribe as opposed to the Washington State Department ofFish and Wildlife
to protect fisheries resources. Commissioners Porter and Schramm were opposed to the amendment.
Commissioner Philpott hoped that owners of the large boats would bring an increased economy to
the area. Commissioner Hewins suggested that the the proposal could allow the outlying areas of
the Harbor to be better utilized. Commissioner Rasmussen hoped that a new yacht basin would draw
people to the area as an attraction. The Commission agreed 3 - 2 to recommend approval of the
proposed map change with Commissioners Schramm and Porter voting against..
3) Rayonier -- defer expansion ofthe commercial land use designation on the former Rayonier Mill
site until completion of the MTCA remedial investigation study is done.
It was agreed 5 - 0 to defer consideration of any change in the designation of the Rayonier
site until the remedial investigation is complete. Commissioner Hewins agreed but noted for
.
116
.
.
.
Plannmg CommISSIOn MlIlutes
May 22, 2002
Page 9
the record that he does not believe this issue should be under consideration particularly with
consideration of a new Industrial Marine zone for the area.
Commissioner Hewins moved to recommend that the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map
be amended per staffs May 22, 2002, memorandum with modifications as previously approved
by the Planning Commission citing the following findings and conclusions:
Findings:
1. The State Legislature mandated that cities and counties subject to the Growth Management
Act complete a comprehensive review of the Comprehensive Plan by September 2002 and
in the Spring 2002 changed the deadline for this update to 2004 for the City of Port Angeles.
2. The City started its comprehensive update ofthe Comp Plan in the Fall 2001 and focused
attention on the Harbor Planning Area, including Downtown and the Rayonier Mill site.
3. The Planning Commission has held numerous informal public meetings starting in
November 2001 through March 2002.
4.
Many of public agency and private property stakeholders in the Harbor and Downtown areas
have participated and made suggestions and comments regarding amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan initially adopted by the City in June 1994 in compliance with the
Growth Management Act.
5. The Department of Community Development staff prepared twelve applications for
Comprehensive Plan changes by March 31, 2002, expanding particularly the Comp Plan
objectives to incorporate projects and land use actions that the Harbor and Downtown
stakeholders want to see happen in the next five years.
6. One of the twelve applications was the proposed utility extension policy change for services
outside the City limits, and, despite the recent State Supreme Court decision nullifying the
petition method of annexation on which the utility extension policy was based, the City has
elected to withdraw consideration ofthat proposed amendment.
7. The eleven remaining proposals resulted in 13 additional Land Use Element policies and
objectives, 4 additional Transportation Element objectives, 1 additional Conservation
Element objective, 2 additional Capital Facilities Element objectives, and 3 proposed Land
Use Map changes.
8.
The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed for the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments,
and the most relevant goals, policies, and objectives included, but were not limited to,
Growth Management Element Goal A, Policy A(1)(a-m), Goal B, Land Use Element Goals
D, F, H, and J, Transportation Element Goals A and D, Conservation Element Goal D, and
Capital Facilities Element Goal A.
117
Planning CommlsslOll Minutes
May 22, 2002
Page 10
9.
.
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map was reviewed relative to land use changes that may
be necessary for planned development and redevelopment along the Harbor shoreline. The
City has endorsed the Rayonier Mill Site Draft Remedial Investigation Plan, which will
provide sampling data and analysis needed for site cleanup and redevelopment.
10. A primary purpose ofthe proposed Comp Plan Amendments CPA 02-01 is to improve the
Plan as a planning tool for facilitating the desired urban design of the City and encourage
growth that the community wants to take place in the next five years.
11. A series of formal public hearings on the proposed Comp Plan Amendments began on May
8, 2001 and are scheduled through June 4, 2002.
12. Updates of other planning areas in the Comp Plan over the next two years, focusing on the
east side next year and the west side the following year, is scheduled for completing the
City's Comprehensive Plan update by the 2004 deadline. The next Comprehensive Plan
review under the Growth Management Act will be due 2011.
13.
P AMC 18.04 Comprehensive Plan Implementation and Amendment sets forth procedures
for annual amendment which include deadlines for applications, requirements for public
hearings, deadlines for decisions and criteria for applications and approvals of amendments.
Proposed amendments shall demonstrate: why existing provisions should not continue,
consistency with the Growth Management Act goals and specific requirements, compliance
with County-Wide Planning Policy, compliance with capital facilities and related plans, why
it is in the public interest, consistency with public health, safety, and welfare, and
consideration ofthe cumulative effects of the amendments.
.
14. The proposed amendments were sent to the State Office of Community Development (OCD),
affected property owners and businesses in the Harbor Planning Area, Port of Port Angeles,
Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, Clallam County, and other City Departments for review.
15. No written comments have been received at the time ofthe staff report.
16. On May 22,2002, the City's SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-
Significance (DNS) #981 and adopted the existing FEIS for the City's Comprehensive Plan
(August 6, 1993), the Addendum to the FEIS for the City's Comprehensive Plan (June 14,
1994), and FSEIS to the City's Comprehensive Plan for the Zoning Implementation
(November 14, 1995).
17.
The Planning Commission held public hearings on the proposed Comprehensive Plan
Amendments CPA 02-01 on May 8 and May 22,2002, and the City Council has scheduled
a public hearing on CPA 02-01 for June 4, 2002.
.
118
.
.
.
Plannmg CommiSSIOn Minutes
May 22, 2002
Page J J
Conclusions:
1. The City has reviewed its Comprehensive Plan and proposed updates in compliance with the
Growth Management Act, the OCD grant received by the City for the mandated review, and
the State Legislature's review deadline of September 2002.
2. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments are consistent with the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan, in particular with the most relevant goals, policies, and objectives
including, but were not limited to, Growth Management Element Goal A, Policy A(1)(a-m),
Goal B, Land Use Element Goals D, F, H, and J, Transportation Element Goals A and D,
Conservation Element Goal D, and Capital Facilities Element Goal A.
3. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map proposed changes will facilitate planned
development and redevelopment along the Harbor shoreline. Any redesignation of the
Rayonier Mill Site should wait until work under the Draft Remedial Investigation Plan,
which will provide sampling data and analysis needed for site cleanup and redevelopment,
has been provided to the City of Port Angeles.
4.
The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments are consistent with the P AMC 18.04
Comprehensive Plan Implementation and Amendment procedures for annual amendment
which include deadlines for applications, requirements for public hearings, deadlines for
decisions and criteria for applications and approvals of amendments.
5. The proposed amendments are consistent with the Clallam County-Wide Planning Policy,
in compliance with the City's capital facilities and related plans, and consistency with public
health, safety, and welfare.
6. Consideration ofthe cumulative effects of the proposed amendments based on the City's
Capital Facilities Plan and compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act through
adoption of the existing FEIS for the City's Comprehensive Plan (August 6, 1993), the
Addendum to the FEIS for the City's Comprehensive Plan (June 14, 1994), and FSEIS to the
City's Comprehensive Plan for the Zoning Implementation (November 14, 1995) determined
there were no significant adverse environmental impacts.
7. The proposed Comp Plan Amendments CPA 02-01 are in the public interest and will
improve the Plan as a planning tool for facilitating the desired urban design of the City and
encourage growth that the community wants to take place in the next five years.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Philpott and passed 5 - O.
119
Plannmg CommIssion Mmutes
May 8, 2002
2002 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Annual
amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan
Director Collins noted that although staff had originally proposed to consider changes in the
designation of the Rayonier property, following discussion with Rayonier it was determined that
such a proposal should wait until sampling data is available for consideration which should occur
early in 2003. Therefore, staffis withdrawing recommendation for consideration of issues regarding
the Rayonier site at this time. Chair Schramm opened the public hearing.
Given the lateness ofthe hour, Commissioner Craver moved to continue the hearing to May 22,
2002, 7 p.m. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Norton and passed 6 - o.
120
.
.
.
121
.
.
.
July 12,2002
,/J~~;c)
'-~
fD)~~~~W[Erm
lf1l, JUN 1 3 2002 lW
City of Port Angeles
Attn: Brad Collins
321 East 5th Street
Port Angeles, W A 98362
CITY Of PORT ANGElES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Re: Austin/Glaubert Property
Dear Mr. Collins:
Weare tne owners of the property at 401 East Front Street which is
directly to the south of property owned by Gerry Austin and Jack Glaubert.
We understand that the Austin/Glaubert property is being considered for a
rezone from light industrial by extension of certain zoning areas. We are
also aware of a lawsuit pending between the parties around that same parcel
of property.
We have owned our property for 19 years and have observed the
Austin/Glaubert property since that time. It appears to be primarily
composed of a natural estuary inhabited by marinelife, birds and animals.
There is a natural flow of water under the old waterline which brings
se~'Yater to the property at mid to high tides.
If there is to be any change to the zoning classification, we would urge
the Council to extend the Open Space area to include this property. Thank
you for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
{2~~
Carol A. Knebes
122
.
.
.
123
/
CLALLAM COUNTY'
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR, BOB MARTIN
BUILDING DIVISION I FIRE MARsHAL
ENVlORNMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
NATIJRAL RESOURCES DIVISION
CLALLAM COUNTY COURTHOUSE
P.O. Box 863/223 EAST FOURTH STREET
PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON 98362-0149
(360) 417-2321, FAX: (360) 417-2443
June 3, 2002
f5)~(c~~WI~rn1
lnl. JUN - 3 2002 lW
~-.s-A
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
COMMUNITY DEVElOPMENT
Mr. Brad Collins, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Port Angeles
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Re: Response to Request for Comments
.
Dear Brad;
Thank you for providing the background materials on the annexation and draft
comprehensive plan and municipal code amendments that are being proposed by the
City. After our meeting this week, I have a clearer understanding of the genesis and
scope of these projects, and I wanted to provide the County's comments prior to the
City Council deliberations that start on June 4,2002. Secondly, in terms of process
issues, I believe we identified what "broke down" in the comment/communicative
process, and from what we discussed, you've taken steps to insure that the County will
be included in the draft review process at an earlier stage.
1.
Municipal Annexation; West of City Landfill I East of Lower Elwha Road
.
As we discussed, we have resolved the apparent records discrepancies
as outlined in my memo to you dated May 21,2002. Our current map
was in error, and this area is, in fact, within the adopted UGA boundary.
In terms of the zoning and comprehensive plan issues, your memo of
May 3D, 2002 (attached), clarified the City's interest to designate the land
as "open space", and zone it ("PBP Public Buildings and Parks"). I would
concur that this is the appropriate designation given your intent to have
this area serve as a buffer between the landfill and the Dry Creek ravine,
and to eliminate an access easement across the landfill site to a
previously designated residential property.
124
2. Proposed Amendments to Comprehensive Plan (CPA 02-01)
I have reviewed the proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan as
outlined in the May 8, 2002 and May 22, 2002 staff memos to the City
Planning Commission. Many of these relate solely to City issues and
concerns, but the County does want to indicate its support of the-proposed
changes that will support our joint goals of enhancing economic
development opportunities, clarifying shoreline, harbor and land use
planning issues, and enhancing transportation and capital facilities
planning.
3. Proposed Amendments to Municipal Code
J have reviewed the proposed draft changes to the City's Municipal Code
as outlined in the staff report to the Planning Commission dated May 22,
2002, and contained in Attachments 8 - E. You and I also reviewed these
during out meeting this past week, and I now have a better idea of the
nature of the changes. It appears that many of these changes are being
made to clarify and simplify development regulations, and eliminate
conflicting language, which is always of benefitl
The one issue that remains of concern to the County relates to the City's
sign standards, particularly those in the Commercial Arterial Zone.. As I
understand it, the City is not proposing to change its standards relating to
off-premise signs in this district, except for the addition of a size limit of
600 square feet, where there currently is no size limitation. Signs of this
type are still limited to sites which do not contain any sign for businesses
located on those sites, and they are subject to a conditional-use permit.
As we have discussed, the County's concern is that this zoning district
(CA) -is what the City has indicated is likely to be applied to the Highway
101 corridor in eastern Port Angeles UGA upon any annexation, and the
proposed 600 square feet sign standard is over 4 Y2 times larger than the
current County standard of 128 square feet. While the County recognizes
that this area is an existing business corridor, it is also a state-designated
scenic highway,. and the County's goal has been to allow effective,
business signage that balances the issues of retaining scenic vistas, while
enhancing the image of the Port Angeles area as a tourist destination.
We believe that the signage size and height found at new or recently-
renovated businesses such as Wal Mart, Safeway Plaza, Bargain
Warehouse, Les Schwab, and others, reflects how this balance can be
achieved.
In our discussions, you indicated that there have been few off-premise
signs that have come in for review under these provisions. I would agree
that this may be related to the lack of parcels without existing businesses
125
2
.
.
.
within the present CA zoned area. This may not be the case within the
UGA area, where there are significantly more vacant parcels.
The County would simply like the City to consider whether this standard
for off-premises signs is designed to achieve the long-range vision
outlined in our jointly adopted Regional Plan for this area. I've attached
some of the relevant policy statements which speak to reduced sign size
and visual enhancements to this entrance of the City. We believe our
adopted sign standards will, over time, help to achieve these objectives,
and we would encourage the City's standards to do the same.
I hope these comments are helpful, and if there are any questions please
give me a call.
Sincerely,
A~.~
Planning Director
cc: Mike Quinn; City Manager
Board of County Commissioners
Dan Engelbertson; County Administrator
Bob Martin; Director/DCD
Russ Veenema; Port Angeles Chamber of Commerce
126
3
.
.
May 15, 2002
rB),1E Ie IE 0 WI IE ,fR)
tru; MAY 2 3 zaa2 IlW
em OF PORT ANGELES
COMMUNITY DEVElOPMENT
Brap Collins,
Department of Community Development
City of Port Angeles
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Changes
Dear Brad:
The Port of Port Angeles appreciates the opportunity to comment on the City's proposed
Comprehensive Plan changes. The changes were discussed at the May 13, 2002
Commission Meeting and the Commission has directed staff to provide the following
comments:
.
Map Change: 1) Extend commercial designation west from downtown to
include the area roughly bounded by Marine Drive on the north, Cedar
Street on the west, and 2/3 alley on the south'.
The Port's concern is the continuous expansion of the commercial
designation will eventually encroach into the Industrial area along.
Marine Drive. The Port has several industrial properties in the
vicinity of the proposed change and future conflicts may occur with
the increased expansion of the commercial zone. .
. The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that designates land qses,
Improves public access to shorelines, abates deteriorating structures, and
allows for expanded recreational and commercial uses.
The Port's recommendation is that the text should include some
reference to deteriorating structures that are held for future
'mitigation. As you know the Port (as well as the City) has several
facilities being held as mitigation sites, and the plan should
recognize these as valuable community assets.
.
Applicant: Port Angeles Downtown Association and Chamber of
Commerce:
10) The City will work with the Port of Port Angeles in the development of
a public golf course.
The Port's recommendation is the text should include the words" if
appropriate". The Commission has not made a determination that
338 West First Street
P.O. Box 1350
Port Angeles, WA 98362
(360) 457-8527
Fax: (360) 452-ii5~ 8
portofpa@olype1jco.lt
COMMISSIONERS
Glenn Beckman
Leonard W. Beil
W. M. "Bill" Hannan
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Clyde H. Boddy
a golf course is the appropriate use of the property or if the
property is viable to be developed as a golf course. The .
Commission is continuing to explore the ideas, but no plans have
yet been finalized.
Your clarification of issues that have come to light in the course of the work sessions
conducted by the Commissioners, has been very helpful. This sharing of information has
been beneficial for both agencies. Thank you for your participation.
If you have any questions on these comments, please do not hesitate to call me at (360)
417-3427.
Sincerely,
PORT OF PORT ANGELES
Executive Director
.
.
129
.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
906 Columbia 51. SW · PO Box 48350 · Olympia, Washington 98504-8350 · (360) 725-2800
~'~M~ ~2U21:2 ~ ~
Monday, April 29, 2002
Brad Collins
City of Port Angeles
321 East Fifth
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles I WA 98362
CITY Of PORT ANGELES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Re: Draft Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Dear Mr. Collins:
. Thank you for sending this department your draft comprehensive plan amendment.
Proposed comprehensive plan amendments for 2002.
We received the notice on April 29, 2002 and forwarded a copy of the notice to other state agencies. If ~
you have not sent the plan to the agencies on the list (enclosed) , please do so.
.
We will forward all comments from other state agencies to you.
If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at (360) 725-3046.
Sincerely,
Wi/p/~~
D~:;:rs
Growth Management Planner
Growth Management Services
Enclosure
1~
o
AGENCIES REVIEWING COMP PLANS
Revised March 28, 2002
Cities and counties need to send their draft comprehensive plans to the agencies'
representatives, as listed below, at least 60 days ahead of adoption. Adopted plans should
be sent to the Washington State Office of Community Development (OCD) immediately
upon publication, as well as to any state agencies that commented on the draft plan. A
jurisdiction does not need to send its plan to the agencies which have been called ahead
and that have indicated the local plan will not be reviewed.
Linda Glasier
Department of Corrections
Post Office Box 41 1 1 2
Olympia, Washington 98504- 1 1 12
(360) 753-6547 Fax: (360) 586-8723
Email: Icglasier@doc1.wa.gov
Lorinda Anderson
Interagency Committee on Outdoor Recreation
Post Office Box 40917
Olympia, Washington 98504-0917
(360) 902-3009 Fax: (360) 902-3026
Email: lorindaa@iac.wa.gov
Rex Derr
Parks and Recreation Commission
Post Office Box 42653
Olympia, Washington 98504-2653
(360) 902-8504 Fax: (360) 753- 1594
Email: rexd@parks.wa.gov
Elizabeth McNagny
Department of Social and Health Services
Post Office Box 45848
Olympia, Washington 98504-5848
(360) 902-8164 Fax: (360) 902-7889
Email: mcnagec@dshs.wa.gov
Bill Wiebe
Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 47300
Olympia, Washington 98504-7370
(360) 705-7965 Fax: (360)' 705-6813
Email: wiebeb@wsdot.wa.gov
Environmental Documents Reviewer
Department of Health
Division of Drinking Water
Post Office Box 47822
Olympia, Washington 98504-7822
(360) 236-3111 Fax: (360) 236-2252
.
Lori Ochoa
Department of Ecology
Post Office Box 47600
Olympia, Washington 98504-7600
(360) 407-6422 Fax: (360) 407-6904
Email: loch461 461@ecy.wa.gov
Millard Deusen
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Post Office Box 43155
Olympia, Washington 98504-3155
(360) 902-2562 Fax: (360) 902-2946
Email: deusemsd@dfw.wa.gov
Anne Sharar
Department of Natural Resources
Post Office Box 47001
Olympia, Washington 98504-7001
(360) 902-1739 Fax: (360) 902-1776
Email: anne.sharar@wadnr.gov
.
Tim Ransom
Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team
Post Office Box 40900
Olympia, WA 98504-0900
(360) 407-7323 Fax: (360) 407-7333
Email: transom@psat.wa.gov
Holly Gadbaw (2 comp plans)
Washington State Office of Community
Development
Post Office Box 48350
Olympia, Washington 98504-8350
(360) 725-3048 Fax: (360) 753-2950
Email: hollyg@cted.wa.gov
.
S:\GMU\Lists for GMU\State Agencies Reviewing Comp Plans.doc
Last Updated March 28, 2002 1 31
.
.
.
Page I of I
Brad Collins
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Ed Chadd <edchadd@olympus.net>
<planning@ci.port-angeles.wa.us>
Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10.47 PM
Rayonier mill site designation
Comments to the Port Angeles Planning Commission and City Council:
Regarding the use of the former Rayonier mill site, I would like to broaden
options for waterfront areas now limited to industrial uses, to include
other water-related uses, including recreation, while not excluding industry
or a mix that includes industry.
I support the proposed change which states that: "Certain commercial,
residential, public, and other mixed uses may be appropriately located in
this zone, and therefore, heavy industrial manufacturing uses, which have
significant nuisance factors, shall not be located in this zone." This
seems to be an improvement over the industrial zone limitation. A cleanup
that is legally adequate for industrial workers is not as high as
that required for areas where other people might spend time. The area at
the mouth of Ennis Creek could serve a variety of functions other than heavy
industry, and I'd like to see the City explore these options.
Thank you,
Edward A. Chadd
307 W. 6-St.
Port Angeles, W A 98362
360-457-5045
132
5/8/02
.
.
.
133
COMPREHE
GELES
;:'LANN,,~G
PLEASE NOTE: Deadline/or applications is March 31, 2002
APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION:
Applicant: Port An1!eles Downtown Association
Address: P.o. Box 1150. Port An1!eles. WA 98362
Daytime phone #: (360) 417-4750
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT /LAND USE MAP CHANGE: (Be specific noting Plan policy
citations.)
The following policy is proposed to be added to the Land Use Element Policy F.(4):
The City should work with the Port Angeles Downtown Association to develop urban design review
guidelines * thatfacilitate architectural elementslfeatures which will encourage complimentary and
aesthetically pleasing new development in the Central Business District (CBD).
(*P ADAlMainStreet Design Guidelines and Port Angeles Downtown Streetscape Design Standards will be
considered. )
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE:
The P ADA has successfully integrated parking, sign regulations, and other business improvements
into the development of the CBD. Urban design review guidelines would be the next step in -
promoting an attractive and complimentary downtown environment that will compete for retail
expenditures of Port Angeles visitors and residents.
SIGNA TURES:
Applicant:
I have read this application in its entirety and believe the information herein presented to be true and correct.
Signature~ ~
Date
3/2A /02-
. (
T:\CP\2002\AmendA.wpd
134
.
.
.
135
COMPREHE
NDMENT
J:>LA N Nn..\G
PLEASE NOTE: Deadlinefor applications is March 31, 2002
APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION:
Applicant:
Address:
Port Anf!eles Downtown Association and Chamber of Commerce
1051/2 E. First Street and 121 E. RailroadAvenue Daytimephone#: 457-9614/452-2363
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXTILAND USE MAP CHANGE: (Note specific Plan
policy citations.) The follo'wing objectives are proposed to be added to the Land Use Element Objectives F( I )-F( 4),
Objectives 1(2)-J(3), Transportation Element Objectives A(2)-A( 4), and Capital Facilities Element Objective A( 4):
1) The City will assist the Chamber of Commerce and the Port Angeles Downtown Association in
developing an historic underground walking tour activity focused on Laurel Street.
2) The City will incorporate bicycle friendly amenities including bike path development and maintenance,
signage, and storage into new transportation facility improvements.
3) The City will study the development ofa seasonal or permanent ice skating rinkfacility.
4) The City will assist the Chamber of Commerce and the Port Angeles Downtown Association in developing
a waterfront promenade along the Downtown waterfront.
5) The City will encourage publie streetscape improvements such as street trees, seasonal displays, and
pedestrian amenities through a comprehensive development and maintenance plan. ~
6) The City will encourage community events such as holiday ceremonies, town gatherings, arts and crafts
displays, and special business activities such as a Farmers' Market during the tourist season, particularly
in the Downtown area and on Laurel Street.
7) The City will develop various parking options including the construction of a parking structure and the
purchase of surface parking lot to mitigate parking impactsfrom the Gateway Project to achieve no net loss
of parking for customer parking, City permit parking, and long term parking.
8) The City,will review, new development/or covered areas or wind screens to allow greater use 0/ outdoor
facilities and public spaces during inclement weather.
9) The City will work with the property owner t,o assure completion of the Waterfront Trail through the
former Rayonier Mill site.
i 0) The City will work with the Port of Port Angeles in the development of a public golf course.
See Attached Chamber of Commerce And Port Angeles Downtown Association Letters
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE:
The Downtown area has made marked improvements that have led to reduced vacancy rates and to
increased private reinvestment in existing buildings and underutiIized land. These objectives will
continue Downtown revitalization.
SIGNATURES:
Applicant:
~~\
;J
Date -3/'2--4 /,6 2-
T:\CP\2002\AmendB.wpd
1~6
.
.
.
137
II
.,..J~
II, IL.l;I
.
.
105% East First Street
P.O. Box 582
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Phone: 360-457-9614
Fax: 360-457-9614
Email: pada@olypen.com
~ORT ANGELES
.L) owx:trlwx
ASSOCIATION
[5)\ IE <<: IE 0 W IE I fR1
lf1lj MAR 22 ZOO2 IlW
-ClTYOF'fORT ANGELES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
March 22, 2002
Mr. Brad Collins .
Community Development Director
City of Port Angeles
PO Box 1150
Port Angeles, W A 98362
Dear Bnid:
The Port Angeles Downtown Association Board of Directors
wishes to request consideration of the following requests for.
inclusion in the revisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
1. Development of a 'Waterfront Promenade' from, at a
minimum, the Black Ball Ferry Terminal to the comer of Oak
Street and Railroad Avenue. We would request that
maintenance funding be built into the cost of the project so that
continual maintenance will be available to keep the area fresh
and vibrant.
2. Provide funding for continuing maintenance, specifically trees,
weeds, and cleaning of all past and future public streetscape
projects. Include maintenance funding for projects already a
part of t4e Comprehensive Plan, as it relates to Downtown and
the Wat~rfront. Proposed projects should include development
'of a comprehensive management and maintenance strategy,
complete with funding.
3. 'Periodic closure of Laurel Street, between Front and First
Street for occasional special events such as the Tree Lighting
and A.rts in Action and special business activities such as a
Farmer~s Market, one 9r two days a week during the summer
eeason.
0", >>tirJi'x if /r! 1l ~ fTO>>wt< a klt4 ."j frorftrf)'f,/ 'b,wx/1Jwx
/
~.
I~~
Iit;li ~
105'12 East First Street
P.O. Box 582
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Phone: ~60-457-9614
Fax: 360-457-9614
Email: pada@olypen.com
~O~T ANGELES
.LJowxtuwx
ASSOCIATION
.
4. Develop parking options, including construction of a parking
structure and the purchase of the surface parking lot at the
comer of First and Laurel Streets to mitigate the parking loss
with the development of the International Gateway Project. To
achieve the required 'no net loss of parking', new parking
would need to include - a. Customer parking; b. City Permit
parking; c. Paid, extended parking.
5. Incorporate, where appropriate, the consideration and use of
the Port Angeles Downtown Association/Main Street'sTM
'Design Guidelines' and 'Port Angeles Downtown Streets cape
Design'.
6. Review traffic circulation in Downtown and the State Highway .
routes that enter DowntoWn.
7. Add to Policy #2, (Goal B) page 66, and other areas deemed
appropriate, the 'Downtown Revitalization Program Main
Street TM' as well as including Parking for Downtown.
8. Add to Policy #6, (Goal A) page 89, use of the 'Downtown
Revitalization Program Main Street™'.
Thank you f9r your attention to our requests.
Sincerely yours,
R ~'
.~
Rudy Hiener .
President
.
0", """<OK if tv l~ ~n""'t< << WtAJ twlj'"!)mJIIJ 'l:JowxirJWJ<
"~
~
~
PORT ANGELES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
121 East Railroad
Port Angeles, WA 98362
(360) 452-2363
~lE(clEnWlEW
f 1
i FE B 1 9 2002 i I
L j
CITY Of PORT ANGElES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
February' 15, 2002
Mr. Brad Collins
Community Development Director
PO Box 1150
Port Angeles. ~4.. 98362
Dear Brad:
Thank you for the opportunity to give some input to the Comprehensive Plan process. The Port
Angeles Chamber of Commerce has discussed a list of options that we would like to see included,
111hich I will detail here, in no particular order of importance.
.
1- Del(elopment ofh.(stoi::jca!J~Q1;:t .~nge.l~$. Wallring four, alJf;{q.ccess,fo r~maining': "
un dergroun (1. W~ un,!er~tt;m.d JhaUh~ undt;r.~o,!:n,d h,~s b~fm.. deb.ated for. guite ,some time
as to the merits tQ (ry an.d.pJ:e$ervejt.(. 01heJ; q)mmuniti~ in the North West have show~
there are true economic benefits' to showcasing" this piece of history. We request that the
- - City not fill in any more of the underground, but instead work with the Chamber,
Historical Society, private land owners, and tenants to make this a destination draw.
2- Increased bike path development and signage is an area that the city needs to continue to
develop. We have signs that say the city is bike friendly but truly we are a long way from
this being accurate. Shoulders in many areas are not wide enough, signage for specific
bikt:' rt:'ute~ are not dev€loped, there are limited areas to secure bikes in town, '1'1d tlw
shoulders that are there, are not maintained making it dangerous for riders.
.
3- Seasonal or permanent ice rink development would be a wondeiful amenity for locals
and visitors. As the community is developed please consider an area where piping could
be put into the concrete to allow a few inches of water to freeze and serve as an ice rink.
Possible options would be to work with th~ YMCA or to use one of the existing parks.
4- Increase ofC~~istn:zas lig~ts. ~_nd s~~so~af.t;lisplays. ,Th~.Nort~We~t J!.arbor Holidays.
commi~tee has s(f!.r~ed a program to.expa1}d the {ights.in the do.wntQw.n.-: HoweveT: with
city help this. endeqvor, c~/d €?cpand.,muah.,quiPker. W,e wo,1f.ld. (;ll~o like,~o; pee,programs
to dei'elop seas'onal displays to include more banners on lamp posts, arches of lights or
other attractive displays across specific streets, and generally a more festive feel to the
community.
FAX # 360-457-5380 · www.port.ing.i'e~rg · E-mail: pangeles@olypen.com
REPRESENTING THE LARGEST ~UF. BUSINESSES ON THE PENINSULA
j
/
i
!
:/
5- The hanging basket program is beautiful, and we encourage development of this to other .
sections of the city. Possible key areas such as Francis Street showcasing the new park,
or Race Street that handles thousands of visitors going up to Hurricane Ridge, or the
Welcome to Port Angeles signs at east and west ends are all possible flower expansion
areas.
6- The City Pier is a wonderful venue but in order to be able to use it more often and with
better success, more wind screens and a larger covered area would be helpful.
7- The waterfront is the main visual attraction for our town, and yet it is very
underdeveloped as an attraction to promote tourism. We strongly recommend the
development of the waterfront promenade idea that has been discussed, with areas of
planters" ben.ches, opportunities for street vendQ~s, and interpretative display areas.
Simple items such as maintaining the surface, updating the logos painted on the
sidewalks, would also help a great deal.
8- The Discovery Trail easement through Rayonier needs to be completed. This would open
up a tremendous amount of easy access hiking and biking areas, and will help bring
people downtown.
9- Continue to push public and private groups to clean up the Rayonier site, to a level that
would allow the site to be used for more than industrial. This is a valuable piece of land,
and could offer long-term benefits to our community if developed properly.
.
10- Development of a public golf course. As the City and Port understand the importance of ~
!f}urism as economic development we hope that somehow a golf course could be
developed using public/private participation. Golf can be played here the majority of the
year, and we unfortunately do not have the chance to market it well because the only
course in town is private.
11- Develop Laurel Street into a pedestrian area between First and Front, and encourage the
use for markets, special events, and town gatherings. This would also be the ideal way to
focus on the historical vt:alJ..ing tours because so mu~h of the history is focused on Laurel,
with the murals and the best access to the remaining underground.
12- More stop signs. Many of the four way intersections in Port Angeles do not have either a
yield, or a stop sign. Accidents happen on a regular basis because of this lack of
sign age, and we encourage signs be installed.
13- Detail Port Angeles. Develop programs to encourage building owners and landowners
to upgrade their facilities. Paint, maintain signs, empty lot detailing, sidewalk cleaning,
garbage pick up, and junk car removal are all areas that could have city involvement.
Residents often stop seeing the areas that are ugly, but someone visiting the area or a
potential resident definitely notices.
.
141
'.
14- Develop a truck by-pass route to keep the large trucks from going through the downtown
area.
15- Stay tourism focused is a general statement but is an attitude that is important. If we as a
community want to attract new business, raise real estate values, and encourage more
retail sales in town there is no better way to do this than to continue to attract people
from outside the area to visit and see what we have to offer. This tourism product will
bring new money and people to the area, and a certain percentage of those visiting will
want to relocate their family or business. This helps the entire economy of our town and
region. This attitude is important for the city staff and elected officials to all be on the
same page and work to develop special events, venues for those events and in general a
more tourism friendly community.
Again thank you for asking our opinion. Should you wish to discuss any of these suggestions in
more detaiLBlease give me a call.
.
~..~
.
142.
.
.
.
143
COMPREHE
ENDMENT
))LANN\~G
PLEASE NOTE: Deadlinefor applications is March 31, 2002
APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION:
Applicant: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Address: P.O. Box 1150. Port Angeles. WA 98362 Daytime phone #: (360) 417-4750
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXTILAND USE MAP CHANGE: (Note specific Plan
policy citations.)
Map Change: J) Extend commercial designation west from downtown to include the area roughly
bounded by Marine Drive on the north, Cedar Street on the west, and 2/3 alley on the south; 2)
Change the industrial designation to commercial on tidelands east 2 and east 3 lying west of Peabody
Avenue.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE:
To include areas currently occupied by commercial uses into the commercial designation, making the
comprehensive plan consistent with current conditions and to allow more reasonable uses of the land:
SIGNATURES:
Applic::ant: City of Port Angeles
I have read this application in its entirety and believe the information herein presented to be true and correct.
~~
Signature
Date
3/1A./02-
, I
Attachment; See attached site maps.
AmendC. wpd
144
.
.
.
145
p-
II
II
i I
I ~ I
(! ~ Ji
'ly
. CITY OF PORT ANGELES
PUBLIC WORKS
~
'1
.
~
~ ~ /<;~
4J - a:: -(,...
wW3: ' '
:J.....w
aj<l:5'
~ 3:
fa
4J
.
../S
-{Va
~I>-~
0'
~
-J
" Q)
~ I~
.:;:. I Vi
" ~,9
4J ;/~
4J -.J
r
: ~l lS 3NI
!
lS 3S
../S
.)SI>-
;YO
../s
tV;v
../S vtV/)
O~
-IS '/It>-)
~ Go:
C) '/)1>-)
" ~
o
I
1000
I I
500
PLANNING AREA MAP
b....
Plot DQ te: 05/02/02
File CDM_PLN .A
p- ..,
o 0 0 -1. - ",
u_
"-I ,
d- o ,
1 .
._,
..-
.... ,
,
.
I
.
. # .
, ~ I
"".,..
......- .-
/'
,_/
I~
,
, /
'--------
,
I
.
i
..
"
:..~
. "
,
.
1
\
l_____
--I
.-
------l
I
~_._-----
,
,
-.. i
. I
1,..--------- -
i
I
--- --,-
I
.
,
.
.-..
"
..
'i
'ii
..
I)
E
E
o
u
':I:i
: :1
: :'
.
I)
- g
. .
- ~
.. ..
-;; c:
::I I)
"D ~
c: 0
-
10
'i
-
..
c: -
I) .
-
"D ..
- c:
. I)
I) "D
a:: -
.
11 I)
- a:
. 11
c:
I) -
D .
c:
E I)
::I D
- .c
'II
I) at
-
:E z
.
'i
'z=
c:
I)
"D
..
I)
a:
11
..
c:
&
.
~
CITY OF PORT ANGELES SCALE
PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING AREA MAP
~ 0 3600
I I I 147
1800
l.. Plot Dn te: 05/02/02 ReviSion Dn te: 05/02/02 File:COM_PLN ,.j
COMPREHE
NDMENT
/:)l.A NN,~G
PLEASE NOTE: Deadlinefor applications is March 31, 2002
APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION:
Applicant: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Address: P.O. Box 1150. Port Angeles. WA 98362 Daytime phone #: (360) 417-4750
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXTILAND USE MAP CHANGE: (Note specific Plan
policy citations.)
The following policy is proposed to be added to the Land Use Element Policy D(3):
The City should vacate rights-ol-way to facilitate retention of existing businesses and location of new
businesses where land assembly is necessary to achieve the desired urban design of the City.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE:
The city should consider development proposals that allow for existing businesses to expand at their
current locations rather than relocating to new sites. Expansion of existing businesses and location
of new businesses in developed urban areas may require additional land to be assembled. If the only
land available is right-of-way or on-street parking, the inability to vacate the right-of-way could result
in the business moving to an outlyin~ area offering more vacant land area. ';
SIGNATURES:
Applicant:
I have read this application in its entirety and believe the information herein presented to be true and correct.
Signature
~. 6,00' -::J
Date
3j'"if1 /0 J-
T:\CP\2002\AmendD. wpd
148
.
.
.
149
COMPREHE
GELES
~l.ANN".\G
PLEASE NOTE: Deadline/or applications is March 31, 2002
APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION:
Applicant: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Address: P.O. Box 1150. Port An~eJes. W A 98362 Daytime phone #:(360) 417-4750
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXTILAND USE MAP CHANGE: (Be specific noting Plan policy
citations.)
The following policy is proposed to be added to the Land Use Element Policy 0(3):
The City will develop an industrial marine (1M) zone for shoreline uses similar to the upland industrial park
(IP) zone which allows for mixed commercial and industrial uses.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE:
The Port Angeles Harbor and waterfront have undergone significant land use changes in response
to a transition from a resource based economy to a service based economy.
SIGNATURES:
Applicant:
~G,02
J
Date
~ J 2-1 / 0 2-
T:\CP\2002\ArnendE. wpd
150
.
.
.
151
.
Chapter 17.36 1M - Industrial, Marine
17.36.010 Purpose. This is an industrial zone intended to preserve industrial areas in the
harbor for marine industrial uses, which are characterized as water dependent or water
related. Because there is a very limited amount of shorelands adjacent to the Port Angeles
Harbor, a zone that allows for mixed uses that do not adversely impact each other can
maximize potential water dependent, water related, and water enjoyment uses of the harbor
without excluding either industrial or nonindustrial uses being intermixed. Certain
commercial, residential, public, and other mixed uses may be appropriately located in this
zone, and, therefore, heavy industrial manufacturing uses, which have significant nuisance
factors, shall not be located in this zone.
.
17.36.020 Penmtted Uses.
A. Emergency stations, including lighthouses, marine rescue, oil clean-up, and other
facilities.
B. Institutional facilities, including marine laboratories and yacht clubs
C. Marinas, including boat moorage, storage, repairs, sales, supplies, marine fueling,
and other services to the boating public.
D. Personal services facilities, such as barber shops, beauty shops, exercise and
reducing studios, tanning salons, and travel agency offices.
E. Recreational facilities, including public parks and piers, aquariums, waterfront trails,
and water enjoyment commercial recreation establishments.
F. Restaurants, cafes, cafeterias, cocktail lounges, delicatessens, and taverns.
G. Specialty shops, such as antique, art supplies, bicycle, book, candy and ice cream,
clothing, coffee and espresso, computer, florist, gift, hobby and toy, jewelry, kayak,
pet, and video rental.
H. Transportation terminals, including facilities for ferries, cruise ships, vehicle rentals,
seaplanes, research vessels, mass transit, and other facilities for moving people not
goods.
17.36.030 Accessory Uses. Accessory uses determined by the Community Development
Director to be compatible with the intent of this Chapter are permitted.
17.36.040 Conditional Uses.
A. Business, professional, and governmental offices incidental to a use permitted under
Section 17.36.020 when located on the same zoning lot as the permitted use.
B. Hotels, motels, convention centers, and auditoriums.
C. Residential structures that are permitted in the RHD zone at the RHD density
allowance area and dimensional requirements, except in areas designated as
restricted clean-up sites.
D. Upland aquaculture facilities.
E. Warehousing and distribution facilities for goods and products.
.
152
D.
E.
17.36.50 Area and Dimensional Requirements.
A. Minimum Lot Area: 7,000 square feet
B. Minimum Lot Width: None.
C. Setbacks:
Front - 25 feet
Rear - 25 feet
Side - IS feet
Maximum Lot Coverage:
Maximum Height:
.
None.
35 feet.
17.36.60 Off-Street Parkin~. (See Chapter 14.40 PAMC.)
17.36.70 Signs.
A. One business sign for each wall not to exceed one square foot for each horizontal
lineal foot of the building wall upon which it is mounted or 300 square feet,
whichever is less, shall be permitted.
B. One free-standing, detached business sign, not exceeding 15 feet in height and 35
square feet in area shall be permitted.
C. Each public and private directional, traffic, and warning attached and detached sign
shall not exceed 6 square feet in area.
D. Signs may be lighted, but not intermittent or flashing.
17.36.80 Desi~n and Landscaping.
A. A minimum five-foot landscaping area shall be provided abutting public rights-of-
way, except for City approved curb cuts.
B. AU lighting on the site shall be directed or shaded so that it does not shine directly on
adjoining property or public right-of-way.
C. A ten-foot wide buffer zone must be maintained from adjacent properties. This
buffer zone shall not be used for storage, driveways, parking~ or structures, except
for fences. A visual screen, consisting of solid fencing, landscaping, or other
materials shall be provided in the buffer zone. If landscaping is used, it shall
include evergreen shrubs planted to form a hedge of 6 feet mature height within three
years of the planting date. All visual screens shall be to a height of 6 feet, except
where views shall not be obstructed in the vision triangle for City approved vehicle
driveway intersections with the street or alley.
D. One tree shall be provided for each 10 parking spaces, exclusive of any perimeter
landscaping. Trees shall have a minimum caliper of two inches and shall have a
height of at least 20 feet at maturity.
.
.
153
/~
","
..---
.
.
.
Rayonier
Environmental Affairs
Statement Prepared
for the
Planning Commission
rD) lE (c lE ~ W lEfn'\
lr\1, JAN 2 3 2002 l1dJ
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
COMMUN1T'f DEVElOPMENT
Thank: you for the opportunity to speak to you about your Comprehensive Land Use plan.
I am Jack Anderson, Manger, Environmental Engineering for Rayonier. My
responsibilities include the supervision of the development and completion of the
environmental cleanup measures at the former Rayonier mill site. My comments are
directed at the connection between your work and Rayonier's long-held goal to return the
site to another productive community use.
Five years ago, more than 350 well-paid jobs ended when the mill closed its doors due to
economic conditions. We were certain that the site as it existed would not be of use to
another business. Therefore, our fIrst step was to dismantle the structures on-site except
for features that have a potential to attract investors into the community such as the dock,
the effluent line and the water supply line.
Since then our focus has been to work with regulatory agencies, the Lower Elwha
Klallam Tribe and other interested groups to accomplish a thorough and expeditious
environmental cleanup. As the environmental project comes closer to completion, the site
will.be actively marketed to fmd a party interested in developing the site for its next use.
Your review of land use designations can have a positive impact on the completion of the
cleanup and the ability to attract new economic investment to the former mill site. While
we cannot predict what the future uses of the site will be, we do know that the site's
previous industrial use and its waterfront location make it suitable for a mix of
commercial and industrial uses which could be productive contributors to the local
economy.
During the development of the site's environmental cleanup plans, we have anticipated a
future mix of commercial'and industrial uses for the property. However, it is important
to realize that the type of use that is allowed under a city's comprehensive land use plan
will have a signifIcant impact on the success ofthe redevelopment of the site. This is
because Washington's environmental regulations only allow for two types of
designations, unrestricted use which includes residential and some commercial uses and,
industrial use which includes light and heavy industry as well as many types of
commercial uses.
700 N. Ennis Street · Port Angeles, WA 98362
Telephone (360) 45.,54. Fax (360) 457-2437
There are precedents in other communities with valuable harbor areas, where they have
faced a similar situation and created a waterfront economic development zone. In these
areas where it is important to promote cleanup within a reasonable time and to attract
economic investment that reflects community preferences, it is necessary that we very
carefully compare the planned land use designations with the environmental restrictions
that will automatically follow those designations.
We encourage your and the community's review of the City's land use designations. We
support this undertaking because we believe that it could further the community's well
being and we are looking forward to being a constructive participant in this process.
January 23, 2002
155.
.
.
.
COMPREHE
NDMENT
..ol.A NNn",G
PLEASE NOTE: Deadlinefor applications is March 31, 2002
APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION:
Applicant: Ci1v of Port Anf!eles and Port of Port Anf!eles
Address: P.O. Box 1150. Port AnlZeIes. WA 98362 Daytime phone #:(360) 417-4750
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT/LAND USE MAP CHANGE: (Be specific noting Plan policy
citations.)
The following objective is proposed to be added to the Land Use Element Objective H(2):
The City will establish a Harbor Study committee comprised of private and public stakeholders in
harbor uses and activities to review and revise the Harbor Resource Management Plan, considering
changes that have occurred in the past 12 years and visions and proposals that now seem possible.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE:
Port Angeles Harbor is a primary economic engine for the City and periodic review of the Harbor
Resource Management Plan is needed to update the Comprehensive Plan under the Growth
Management Act. ' _ -
SIGNATURES:
Applicant:
I have read this application in its entirety and believe the information herein presented to be true and correct.
Signature _~ ~: :> Date 3/1-'1 / {> t-
T:\CP\2002\AmendF. wpd
156
.
.
.
157
COMPREHE
NDMENT
.ol.ANN\~G
PLEASE NOTE: Deadlinefor applications is March 31, 2002
APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION:
Applicant: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Address: P.O. Box] 150. Port Angeles. WA 98362 Daytime phone #: (360) 417-4750
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXTILAND USE MAP CHANGE: (Note specific Plan
policy citations.)
The following objective is proposed to be added to the Land Use Element Objective D(I):
The City will work with the Elwha Tribe to develop a cultural center and marina for large pleasure boats
located in Port Angeles Harbor.
Revision to Comprehensive Plan Map designating Ediz Hook (portions of) and Port Angeles Harbor
(portions of) as commercial.
JUSTIFICA TION FOR CHANGE:
Ediz Hook is underutilized. Tribal cultural center would attract commercial activity. Development
of a marina for large pleasure boats would stimulate clean-up of.deteriorating structures along the
shoreline of Port Angeles Harbor and act as an economic driver for boat building/servicing industries.
SIGNATURES:
Applicant:
I have read this application in its entirety and believe the information herein presented to be true and correct.
. Signature ~ ~. -:7 Date J / VI /02.-
Attachment: See attached site map.
AmendG.wpd
158
.
.
.
159
fT
.
w
.
.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
PUBLIC WORKS
~
b...
Plot Do. te. 05/02/02
SCALE
o
I
I
500
I a!
0:1
I 61
J
Ef
I
i
1
.
/
\ ,",
! /,......",
'{ .I I II,
/1, I . ,
f I I ! i
I I! I'
I :! I
I .1 I' i I
i I II
I I I!
11'1 I
I[ i1: /
\ oJC:i
j;.5
I I f8
;,~
;\,9
~{1I
1 ~ I I
~.
j!
1 '
\1 I
\, I i
\, I I J
'~, !/
,. ,-'
\
"\
"\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
1000
I
'1
PLANNING AREA MAP
File.COM_PLN ---l
.
.
.
161
COMPREHE
NDMENT
"l)l.ANNn~G
PLEASE NOTE: Deadline/or applications is March 31, 2002
APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION:
Applicant: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Address: P.O. Box 1150. Port Angeles. WA 98362 Daytime phone #: (60) 417-4750
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXTILAND USE MAP CHANGE: (Note specific Plan
policy citations.)
The following objective is proposed to be added to the Land Use Element Objective D(2):
The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that designates land uses, improves public access to
shorelines, abates deteriorating structures, and allows for expanded recreational and commercial uses.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE:
Ediz Hook and the northern portion of the inner Port Angeles Harbor are underutilized by existing
industrial structures, which are neglected and deteriorating.
SIGNATURES:
Applicant: The City of Port Angeles
I have read this application in its entirety and believe the information herein presented to be true and correct.
Signature
~ G,do' J
Date
3/v; j()]-
Attachment
AmendH.wpd
162
.
.
.
163
COMPREHE
NDMENT
,oL.ANNn.\G
PLEASE NOTE: Deadlinefor applications is March 31, 2002
APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION:
Applicant: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Address: P.O. Box 1150. Port Angeles. WA 98362 Daytime phone #: (360) 417-4750
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXTILAND USE MAP CHANGE: (Be specific noting Plan policy
citations.)
The following objective is proposed to be added to the Capital Facilities Element Objective A(5):
The City will establish a review process with a more comprehensive analysis of Capital Facilities Plan
projects that addresses new mandates for environmental protection such as the Endangered Species Act
(ESA), extension of urban services into the Urban Growth Area (UGA) and new residential areas within the
City, and needs to preserve and maintain service levels impacted by changes such as the Elwha dam
removal, landfill closure, and agi,wfacilities.
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE:
Concurrency and level of service (LOS) standards are mandated by the Growth Management Act and
the City's Comprehensive Plan.
SIGNA TURES:
Applicant:
I have read this application in its entirety and believe the information herein presented to be true and correct.
Signature
~~
Date
S)1AI07.-
T:\CP\2002\ArnendI. wpd
164
.
.
.
165
COMPREHE
,o(ANN,,~G
PLEASE NOTE: Deadline for applications is March 31, 2002
APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION:
Applicant: CITY OF PORT ANGELES .
Address: P.O. Box 1150. Port Angeles. WA 98362 Daytime phone #: (360) 417-4750
,
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXTILAND USE MAP CHANGE: (Be specific noting Plan policy
citations.) , b/IO
The following objective is proposed to be added to the Transportation Element Objective ~:
The City will update transportation policies to refocus circulation patterns, street improvements, essential
state highways, truck routing, and traffic controls throughout the City with particular attention to the
Central Business District (eBD).
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE:
State legislation, tax limitation initiatives, tax revenue trends, and reduced capital improvemen'-
funding have altered what infrastructure development can be expected to serve the land use plan of
the City.
SIGNATURES:
Applicant:
I have read this application in its entirety and believe the information herein presented to be true and correct.
Signature.
~
/' ,,'" '
~ ~
Date
>/ Vi / Ct 2-
.
T:\CP\2002\AmendJ. wpd
166
.
.
.
167
COMPREHE
ENDMENT
,oLANNn~G
PLEASENOTE: Deadlinefor applications is March 31,2002
APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION:
Applicant: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Address: P.O. Box]] 50. Port Angeles. W A 98362 Daytime phone #: (360) 417-4750
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXTILAND USE MAP CHANGE:'(Be specific noting Plan policy
citations.)
Revision of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Mapfor theformer Rayonier Mill site per one of two
alternatives: (1) commercial for areas below the main bluff and along Ennis/White's Creeks and
residential above the marine bluffs; and (2) commercial north of the line along and extended
between the base of the marine bluffs and residential above the marine bluffs.
JUSTIFICA TION FOR CHANGE:
Redesignation of the site at this time will aid in the determination of environmental clean up
standards. Redevelopment of the former mill site in close proximity to residential and-
environmentally sensitive areas should not be done with land uses that have nuisance characteristics
such as industrial.
SIGNATURES:
Applicant:
I have read this application in its entirety and believe the information herein presented to be true and correct.
Signature
~~
Date 3/2-1)0 ~
T:\CP\2002\AmendK. wpd
168
.
.
.
169
en
z
o
0::
-
>
z
w
o
z
<(
w
~
.
0:::
W
-
Z
o
~
a::
.
.. "-..
....
......
~ 0 ~
u.. 0 -_
"'!.~
..... ~
~
-=-
o ~
.g".
..
J
'~s
1
z+~
3:
o
o
co
o
o
('t)
o
It')
......
o
en
z
o
a::
-
>
z
w
Cl
Z
<(
W
I-
-
~
W
-
Z
o
>-
~
.
.. .. ..-
......
......
w
2+00
3:
,~ 1, 1 ~
~g ~ ~ 1;; J;-t
~.1~1J-
j ,'- ~ f
~ ~ ill 111 ru ffi
o
o
<0
o
o
C")
o
LO
.....
o
.
.
.
n- 'OR' 'T'~ ^ IN:G'E' LE'iS
1~ " '.A: .I' '. I , · ,
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
June 17,2002
To:
MA YOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
Brad Collins, Communi1y Development Director 'j7v
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS MCA 01-02B
Summary: In 2001, the City Council appointed a Citizen Code Advisory Committee (CCAC)
of representatives from community interests related to development. They were asked to review
the language in the Municipal Code to make it more user-friendly and understandable by the
public. The CCAC suggestions were made into proposed amendments, which have been
reviewed by the Planning Commission at a number of public hearings. Some of the amendments,
particularly in the Sign Code, continue to be issues, which the City Council will need to resolve.
Recommendation: Department of Community Development recommends that the City
Council conduct a public hearing on Municipal Code Amendments MCA 01-02B and continue
the hearing to the regular City Council meeting of July 16, 2002, at 7 :00 pm in the City Council
Chambers.
Background / Analysis:
The Planning Commission review has reviewed all the suggested changes, and a near
consensus with the Citizen Code Advisory Committee/staff recommendations has been achieved.
SECTION 14.01.090 - CONSTRUCTION CODE BOARD OF APPEALS:
CCAC Suggestion:
There needs to be a better explanation of why some interpretations are not appealable.
Sections A, C, and H describe appealable issues, limitations of authority, and scope of
Board's review. The Committee did not offer any specific language amendments, but the
Planning Commission should review how to gain code compliance through positive, service
oriented mission as opposed to an inflexible, strict interpretation bureaucratic process.
Staff Proposal:
Appealable Issues. This Section shall govern appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations,
made by the Building Official, Fire Chief, Electrical Inspector, their designees, or any
enforcement officer as defined in PAMC 14.01.060, in the application and interpretation of
the construction codes of the City of Port Angeles regarding the suitability of alternative
materials and methods of construction and the application and intcIPlc,tation ofthc
172
MeA 01-02B
June 17,2002
Page 2
comtItlction e~d's orth, Ci~y of Port Angeles and any othe_r ~uildin~,~egulfltio~s orcodes" '_.
as may be deSIgnated by ordmance. '."'. ;' '
Planning Commission Recommendation:
Agree with the CCAC suggestion and staff proposal -- no issues, minor editing changes.
SECTION 14.03.040(b) - FEES:
CCAC Suggestion:
Adjust the minimum inspection fee to better reflect the cost of doing the inspection.
Staff Proposal:
Fee will be adjusted at the time of fee review during the budget process.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
Agree with CCAC suggestion and staff proposal.
CHAPTER 14.36 SIGN CODE:
CCAC Suggestion:
Consolidate all the sign regulations into Chapter 14.36 following the language in the
Downtown Sign Code and incorporating the Zoning Code sign regulations for other zones.
.
Staff Proposal:
See Attachment B for all the proposed amendments.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
Agree with CCAC suggestion and most of the staffproposal-- issues regarding billboards
size limits (see Clallam County comment letter), prohibited signs including fluttering devices
and mobile signs (see Planning Commission minutes), and requirements for electronically
changing message, temporary commercial event, and A-frame signs (see Attachment B).
SECTION 14.40.030-060 PARKING SPACE REOUIREMENTS:
CCAC Suggestion:
Add requirements for new uses and modify or eliminate requirements for archaic uses.
Staff Proposal:
See Attachment C for all the proposed amendments.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
Agree with CCAC suggestion and most ofthe staff proposal -- issues regarding institutions
like hospitals and colleges, minimum parking requirements for certain uses or number of
employees, and archaic uses (see Planning Commission minutes). .
173
MeA 01-02B
June 17,2002
Page 3
. SECTION 15.04.030 CRITICAL AREAS:
CCAC Suggestion:
Consider streamlining the environmental review procedures to eliminate duplication but
maintain public notice and comment opportunities.
Staff Proposal:
Follow environmental review reform implemented successfully by other jurisdictions.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
Agree with CCAC suggestion and staff proposal -- no issues, do not make changes at this
time since oth,er jurisdictions have not fully implemented environmental review reforms.
CHAPTERS 16.04 AND 16.08 SHORT PLAT SUBDIVISIONS AND SUBDIVISIONS:
CCAC Suggestion:
Clarify regulations and standardized street improvement requirements.
Staff Proposal:
See Attachment D for all the proposed amendments.
.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
Agree with CCAC suggestion and staff proposal-- no issues, language clarified and street
standards made consistent (see Attachment D).
TITLE 17 ZONING CODE:
CCAC Suggestion:
Clarify and emphasize what development is desired in each zone.
Staff Proposal:
See Attachment E for all the proposed amendments.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
Agree with CCAC suggestion and staffproposal-- no issues, zone intentions clarified (see
Attachment E)
.
Attachments: Attachment B Sign Code Amendments
Attachment C Parking Requirement Amendments
Attachment D Subdivision Ordinances Amendments
Attachment E Zoning Code Amendments
Clallam County Comment Letter
174
.
.
.
175
.
14.36.010
14.36.020
Sections:
14.36.010
14.36.020
14.36.030
14.36.040
14.36.050
14.36.060
14.36.070
14.36.080
14.36.090
14.36.100
14.36.110
14.36.120
14.36.130
.
ATTACHMENT B
Chapter 14.36
SIGN CODE
Purpose.
Definitions.
Applicability.
Permit.
Exempt Signs.
Requirements Applicable to All Nonexempt Signs.
Permitted Signs.
Prohibited Signs.
Removal of Prohibited and Nonconforming Signs.
Variances.
Notice.
Enforcement.
Violation - Penalty.
14.36.010 Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to enhance the aesthetic and
commercial appeal of the. Cc.ntral Dtlsine.ss District ofthe City by establishing standards and
regulations for the design, placement, size and maintenance of all exterior signs and sign
structures. which convey a commercial message and aid the general public in locating
businesses. goods. and services. , in order to empllasize the. pe.dcstrian nMthC ofthc. Central
Dmincss District. The Sign Code differentiates between the intensities of various
commercial and industrial zones as well as the pedestrian character of the Central Business
District and Commercial Neighborhood Zones and the automobile-oriented character of
other commercial and industrial zones. Commercial message signs are not allowed in
residential zones. except as provided for Residential Trailer Parks and Bed & Breakfasts in
Chapters 17.13 and 17.18 P AMC. Residential structure and subdivision identification signs
permitted in Titles 16 and 17 are not considered commercial message signs and. therefore.
are not regulated under the Sign Code Chapter 14.36 PAMC. It is further the purpose of this
Chapter to protect the general health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City and
ensure vehicular and pedestrian safety by prohibiting flashing, rotating. mobile. and similar
signs that may distract or change locations and thereby endanger the traveling public. ,-both
existing as ~dl as those placed in the Cc..lltral Dtlsincss District in the future. (Ord. 2152 ~1,
7/1/81.)
14.36.020 Definitions.
A. Except where specifically defined herein, all words used in this Chapter shall
carry their customary meanings. Words used in the present tense include the future, and the
"-
plural includes the singular. The word "shall" is mandatory; the word "may" denotes a use
of discretion in making a decision. The words "used" or "occupied" shall be considered as
though followed by the words "or intended,1 maintained, arranged, or designated to be used
or occupied." I
I
176
I
.
14.36.020
B. Banner. Sign. A piece ofmanmade or natural cloth or fabric, displaying a
distineti vC non-COnll110Gial design, which is securely attached by one two or more edges to a
building or pole& or staff or other de v ice irrtchdcd for SUGh displaJ.
C. Billboards. An Boff-premise outdoor advertising signs containing a
commercial message, COnllt'1elCial 01 OthGl ~ise, unrelated to any use or activity of the
property on which the sign is located.
D. Display Surface. That part of a sign structure used to display an integrated
advertising message.
E. Fluttering Device. Pennants. flags. flyers. ribbons. balloons. or other
fluttering devices or strings of such devices. which are used to attract attention for
commercial purposes.
EE. Marquee or Awning. A permanent covering structure projecting horizontally
from and attached to a building, affording protection from the elements; including but not
limited to fire-resistive cloth awnings and mansard roofs.
GF. Person. Any individual, corporation, association, firm, partnership, and the
like, singular or plural.
He. Right-of-way means a dedicated or owned right-of-way of the City, between
the outer boundaries thereof, within which may be located a street, highway, sidewalk, alley,
avenue, or other structure used for pedestrian or vehicular traffic, or a utility structure or
appurtenance. A right-of-way or easement is included within the definition of "Right-of-
way", whether such right-of-way or easement is currently used or not.
rH. Shopping Mall. For the purpose of this Chapter, a shopping mall is a group
of stores and businesses operating by formal agreement under one management and with an
association responsible for marketing and promotion activities of the businesses as an entity,
generally occurring in one building, but occasionally occurring in more than one building, on
a site that is developed and operated as a single, integrated entity.
If. Sidewalk means that portion of the right-of-way, if any, which is designed for
pedestrian use, adjacent and parallel to a street. "Sidewalk" includes the area which would
otherwise be a planting strip, ifthe area is either covered with cement or is otherwise used
for pedestrian travel.
KJ. Sign. Any letters, figures, design, symbol, trademark, or device intended to
attract attention for commercial purposes to any activity, service, place, subject, person, firm,
corporation, public performance, article, machine, or merchandise, and including display
surfaces and supporting structures thereof.
L*:. Si gn Area. The area of the sign shall be the sum of each display surface,
including both sides of a double-faced sign, as determined by circumscribing the exterior
limits on the mass of each display erected on one sign structure with a circle, triangle, or
quadrangle connecting all extreme points. Where a sign is composed of two or more
individual letters mounted directly on a wall, the total display surface, including its
background, shall be considered one sign for purposes of calculating sign area. The
structure supporting a sign is not included in determining the area of the sign unless the
structure is designed in a way to form an integral part of the display.
June 17,2002
Page 2
177
.
.
.
.
14.36.020
.
Mb. Sign. A-Frame. A small portable sign consisting of two identically sized
surfaces permanently joined at the top and capable of opening to an inverted "V" of fixed
maximum width so that the sign supports itself and looks like a capital "A" when viewed
from a point perpendicular to the display surfaces.
N. Sign. Auto-Oriented. A sign designed to identify a business or commercial
activity to a person travelling in an automobile or other motorized vehicle on the adjacent
street.
O. Sign. Building-Mounted. A single or multiple faced sign. which is
permanently attached to a building and which is also known as an attached sign. since it is
attached or mounted on a building.
fM. Sign. Freestanding. A single or multiple faced sign, which is supported by
one or more columns, uprights, or braces that are permanently attached to the ground and
which is also known as a detached sign, since it is not attached or mounted on a building.
QN. Sign. Marquee or Awning. Any sign attached to, supported by, or
incorporated in a marquee or awning
R.. Sign. Mobile. Any sign that is not permanently attached to a building or the
ground including A-frame signs. sawhorse signs. trailer-mounted signs. vehicle-mounted
signs. pole temporary attachments. and large inflated displays.
.s.e. Sign. Pedestrian-Oriented. A small sign designed to identify a business or
commercial activity to a person walking nearby pcdcshian and indicate the location ofthe
entrance business.
IP. Sign. Projecting. Any sign other than a wall sign which extends more than
twelve (12) inches from the facade of the building to which it is attached.
U~. Sign. Roof. Any sign erected upon, against, or directly above a roof or on top
of or above the parapet of the building.
VR. Sign. Rotating. Any sign which rotates on a fixed axis.
WB. Sign. Temporary. A sign constructed of cloth, canvas, cardboard, wallboard,
or other light material, intended to be displayed for a limited period of time, not to exceed
ninety (90) days within a single calendar year, unless otherwise specified in this Ordinance.
XF. Sign. Wall. Any sign permanently attached to and supported by the wall of a
building or the wall of a structure, with the exposed face of the sign in a plane parallel to the
plane of said wall.
VB. Sign. Window. Any sign located inside and affixed to or within three (3) feet
of the window panes of a building, whether temporary or permanent.
ZJf. Street. A public right-of-way which affords a primary means of access to
abutting property.
AAW. Street Frontage. The side of a building or property facing a public street.
BB*. Surface Area or Facade. The surface area or facade shall be the area of that
continuous exterior front, side, or back surface of a building, including doors and windows,
but excluding any roof area.
Cc. Visible Sign Area. The total of all sign faces visible from anyone location.
(Drd. 2452 ~1, 7/30/89; Ord. 2182 Sl, 12/15/81; Ord. 2152 ~2, 7/1/81.)
.
June 17,2002
Page 3
178
14.36.030
14.36.050 .
14.36.030 Applicability. This Chapter shall regulate signs in the alea z:ol!ed Central
DminGss District throughout the City of Port Angeles and in all nonresidential zones as iris
they are designated in Ordinance No. 1709 and as they are set forth in the Official Zoning
Map for the City, as it they now exists or may hereafter be amended. (Ord. 2152 ~3, 7/1/81.)
14.36.040 Permit.
A. Required. No person shall erect, relocate, or otherwise construct or alter any
sign in the Cc.ntral Dusinc,ss District City without complying with this Chapter and, when
required, obtaining a sign permit from the Building Division of the City of Port Angeles. A
separate permit ~hall be required for each sign for which a permit is required.
B. Permit Application. Each permit application shall be filed with the Building
Division by the property owner, lessee, contract purchaser, or other person entitled to
possession of the property, or by an authorized agent, on a form provided by the City, and
shall contain and include the following:
1. Building name and location.
2. Building owner and lessee; sign owner and sign lessee; name of
business; primary product and/or service.
3. Location of existing and proposed signs.
4. Descriptions of signs, including dimensions, materials, and copy
5. Required fee.
6. Name, address, and telephone number of the sign installer.
7. Notarized statement that the building owner or an authorized
representative will remove the sign within one year ifthe business becomes non-operating.
C. Permit Fee Schedule. A permit fee in an amount as shall from time to time
be set by the City Council by resolution shall be paid to the Building Division.
D. Activities Exempt from the Permit Requirements. The following activities
shall not require a permit:
1. The changing of advertising copy or message on a lawfully erected
painted or printed sign, theater marquee, or similar signs specifically designed for the use of
changeable copy.
2. Maintenance or cleaning of a sign, and repainting existing copy of a
permitted sign or legal nonconforming sign. (Ord. 2542 ~2, 7/30/89; Ord. 2152 ~4, 7/1/81.)
.
material.
14.36.050 Exempt Signs. The following signs are exempt from the permit
requirements of this Chapter:
A. Official traffic signs, directional signs, banners, signals, business directory
maps, kiosks, and public notices erected by public authorities.
B. Informational service signs, such as "Customer Parking", "Driveway
Entrance" and "Exit", not to exceed six (6) square feet. Although these signs are exempt. an
electrical permit may be required for installation.
.
June 17,2002
Page 4
179
.
14.36.050
.
C. Signs identifying public conveniences, such as restrooms, telephones, bus
stops, and taxicab stands, not to exceed three (3) square feet.
D. Informational warning signs, such as "No Trespassing," "No Dumping," "No
Parking," not to exceed eight (8) square feet.
E. Building address identification numbers are to be no more than twelve (12)
inches in height, nor less than six (6) inches in height. Number material must contrast with
wall color they are mounted on.
F. A permanent building identification, including building plaques,
cornerstones, name plates, and similar devices.
G. Temporary political signs and 5ign5 displaY5 in window5 of part} political
hcadquartcls, provided they such signs are not located in public rights-or-way and are
removed within' fourteen (14) days after the election.
H. Temporary decorations customarily displayed at special holidays, such as
Christmas and Independence Day, provided they are removed within fourteen (14) days after
the holiday.
L. Seasonal decorations. banners. and other distinctive noncommercial displays
affixed to light poles. or other public standard. by the City or nonprofit organizations.
1.1. One temporary real estate sign for each street frontage located on the
premises for sale, lease, or rent, not exceeding eight (8) square feet; provided that it is
removed fourteen (14) days after the sale, lease, or rent of the premises. Two A-frame
temporary real estate open house signs not located in the public right-of-way and not
exceeding eight (8) square feet in total sign area for each sign: provided that the signs are
removed when the house is not open to the public.
Kf. One temporary sign for each street frontage denoting the architect, engineer,
or contractor, placed upon work under construction, not to exceed eight .(8) square feet;
provided it is removed fourteen (14) days after completion of construction.
L*:. Any sign located within a building not visible from the street or sidewalk.
Although these signs are exempt. an electrical permit may be required for installation.
Mh One state flag and two national flags on per building site of a government
institutions and or commercial institutions establishments.
NM. Sculptures, fountains, mosaics, murals, not incorporating advertising or
identification of a business.
ON. Sandwich board signs worn by a person while walking the public ways of the
City.
fe. Signs painted directly on windows and window signs, except as the type of
sign may be specifically prohibited by Section 14.36.110 of this Chapter.
QP. Traditional theater marquees, not exceeding two hundred sixty (260) square
feet. Although these signs are exempt. a building permit and an electrical permit may be
required for construction.
R~. Barber Poles. Although these signs are exempt, an electrical permit may be
required for installation.
.
June 17, 2002
180
Page 5
14.36.050
14.36.070 .
SR. Temporary community service signs which are erected by community service
organizations, are intended to record and display the progress toward a community goal or
announce a coming community event, do not exceed two hundred (200) square feet, are
installed pursuant to a building permit, are removed within fourteen (14) days after the
event, and are not up for more than three (3) months in any calendar year or in any six-
month period commencing at the date of installation; except that this Section shall not allow
the type of signs that are specifically prohibited by Section 14.36.110 of this Chapter; except
further that for the purposes of this Section, community service signs shall not be considered
billboards.
T. Signs mounted on public transit vehicles and facilities. (Ord. 2542 ~3,
7/30/89; Ord. 2182 ~2, 12/15/81; Ord. 2152 ~5, 7/1/81.)
14.36.060 Requirements Applicable to All Nonexempt Signs.
A. Sign Illumination. Illumination from or upon any sign shall be shaded,
shielded, directed or reduced as to avoid undue brightness, glare or reflection of light on
private or public property in the surrounding area, and so as to avoid unreasonably
distracting pedestrians and motorists. "Undue brightness" is illumination in excess of that
which is reasonably necessary to make the sign reasonably visible to the average person on
an adjacent street or recognized pedestrian or marine route.
B. Content. Content of commercial signs shall be limited to identification of
business, major enterprise, product or service. A sign may utilize changeable copy;
provided that the copy is limited to identification of products sold and services offered or
contains a community service message; and provided further that any sign authorized in this
Chapter shall be allowed to contain non-commercial copy in lieu of any other copy and that
content of noncommercial signs shall not be regulated or limited pursuant to this Chapter or
any other Ordinance' of the City of Port Angeles, nor shall any such Ordinance be so
construed.
C. Compliance with other ordinances. Nothing in this Chapter shall be
construed to modify or in any other manner alter the requirement that any sign comply with
all other ordinances of the City as they may now exist or hereafter be amended; except that
content of noncommercial signs shall not be regulated or limited by any such Ordinance, nor
shall any such Ordinance be so construed. (Ord. 2649 ~1, 8/20/91; Ord. 215296, 7/1/81.)
14.36.070 Permitted Signs.
A. Total Sign AIca on Sheets Signs in the Central Business District (CBD)
Zone. Each individual business with street frontage may have a total sign area visible from
the street of all nonexempt signs not to exceed 20% of the surface area of the building
facade occupied by the business, or two hundred (200) square feet, whichever is less, and up
to 90% of the sign may be on a part of the same facade not occupied by the business. When
a building is located on more than one street frontage, each visible building facade shall be
considered separately. Such signs may be wall signs, marquee signs, pedestrian signs,
June 17,2002
Page 6
181
.
.
.
14.36.070
.
freestanding signs, projecting signs, or any combination thereof, subject to the following
standards:
1. Wall Signs. Wall signs shall be mounted parallel to the building
facade and shall project no more than eighteen (18) inches from the wall on which they are
attached.
2. Marquee or Awning Signs. A sign may be mounted on the front or
front outer top edge of a marquee or awning, parallel to the street frontage; provided that the
sign shall not exceed a vertical distance of two (2) feet above the front outer top horizontal
edge of the marquee or awning and all supporting mechanisms are concealed from view; or
a sign may be mounted on the side of a marquee or awning, provided it does not extend
above the top of the side. A sign may be mounted on top of a marquee or awning, provided
that it does not project more than four and one-half (4-1/2) feet from the building facade. A
sign that projects below the marquee or awning shall comply with the requirements of
S 14.36.1 00(A)(3) (Pedestrian Signs). The sign area for a back-lit marquee or awning sign
comprised of individual letters, figures, design, symbol, or trademark painted or mounted
and projecting less than three (3) inches from the surface of the marquee or awning shall not
include the lighted background that is outside the area that circumscribes the exterior limits
of the dimensions of the sign.
3. Pedestrian Signs. A pedestrian sign attached to the underside of a
marquee or awning shall be at a right angle to the plane of the building facade and not
extend beyond the outer edge of the marquee or awning. A clearance of not less than eight
(8) feet from the underlying sidewalk shall be maintained. Said sign shall not exceed six (6)
square feet in sign area per side.
4. Freestanding Signs. Where all portions of a building are located more
than fifteen (15) feet from the street right-of-way the building may have one freestanding
sign in addition to the sign~age allowed on the building, provided that it shall not exceed
twenty-five (25) square feet in sign area per side or twenty (20) feet in height. lfthe
building has frontage on two or more streets and the building is more than forty (40) feet
from those streets, the building may have one freestanding sign that shall not exceed one
hundred (100) square feet of sign area per side or a total of two hundred (200) square feet of
sign area, whichever is less, or thirty (30) feet in height; provided that the sign area shall be
considered part of the total sign area of the building and deducted equally from the
allowable sign area of the facades that are more than forty (40) feet from the street; and
further provided that the sign area of the freestanding sign shall not exceed the total sign
area allowed the building.
5. Projecting Signs. Projecting signs may be mounted at a right angle to
the plane of the building facade, provided the sign shall not extend more than four and one-
half (4-1/2) feet beyond the facade of the building. Further provided that signs occurring
under marquees or awnings shall be governed by the requirements for pedestrian signs in
Subsections (A)(3) of this Section. Projecting signs not occurring under marquees shall
maintain a clearance of not less than eight (8) feet from the underlying sidewalk.
QB. Upper Floor Businesses. The total sign area for a business occupying
an upper story of a building with street frontage shall not exceed 20% of the surface of the
building facade occupied by the business, or two hundred (200) square feet, whichever is
.
June 17,2002
182
Page 7
14.36.070
less. An upper floor business or businesses may have one sign on the street level identifying
the upstairs businesses, provided that said sign shall not exceed six (6) square feet.
1€. Multiple Businesses. Arcades. and Galleries. The total sign area of
two or more businesses sharing a common facade with at least one business not having a
street frontage shall not exceed 20% of the surface area of the common facade. One
additional sign, not exceeding six (6) square feet, listing all of the businesses may be
provided.
.8.:8. Sign Area on Alleys. Each individual business with alley frontage
may have a total sign area of all signs not to exceed 10% of the surface area of the building
facade on the alley occupied by the business; provided, however, that individual businesses
without street frpntage may have 20% or 200 square feet, whichever is less. Alley signs
shall be mounted parallel to the building facade and project no further than twelve (12)
inches from the wall on which the sign is attached.
2E. Sign Area on Side Walls. Signs may be mounted on exposed side
walls of buildings, which walls do not have street frontage, in accordance with Subsection
(A) of this Section; provided, that only the area of the exposed wall shall be considered the
surface area of the facade.
l.QF. Shopping Malls. The total sign area for a sQopping mall facade shall
not exceed 20% of the facade or three hundred (300) square feet, whichever is less. Signs
may be placed on any facade of a shopping mall, provided the maximum allowable sign area
of that facade is not exceeded, and the sign is part of a master sign permit in the name of the
manager of the mall that identifies all of the signs for the shopping mall. Where all portions
of the shopping mall are more than fifteen (15) feet from the street right-of-way, one
freestanding sign per street frontage, with a maximum of two (2) such signs per site, may be
installed, provided that each sign shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in height and two
hundred (200) square feet in total area, or one hundred (100) square feet in area per side;
provided, however, that for those signs containing over one hundred (100) square feet of
sign area, the display surfaces shall be parallel and back-to-back to each other; and further
provided that the sign area shall be included in the total permitted sign area for the facade on
that same street frontage.
116. Nonbuilding Business. The total sign area for a business in which no
portion of the business occurs within a building shall not exceed sixty-four (64) square feet
per street frontage and shall be located on the property of the business. Nonbuilding
business signs may be fr~estanding, provided that each sign shall not exceed twenty (20) feet
in height and thirty-two (32) square feet in sign area per side; provided that there shall not be
more than one (1) free-standing sign per street frontage. (Ord. 2542 ~4, 7/30/89; Ord. 2182
~3, 12/15/81; Ord. 2152 97, 7/1/81.)
B. Signs in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. Signs may be lighted but not
intermittent or flashing type. All signs over ten (10) square feet in area shall be restricted to
territory no closer than 100 feet to all residential property in a residential zone. Maximum
height shall be 35 feet. Such signs may be wall signs. marquee signs. pedestrian signs.
June 17,2002
Page 8
183
.
.
.
.
14.36.070
.
freestanding signs. proiecting signs. or any combination thereof. subiect to the following
standards: Mc1Ximmn Sign AIea.
l.. Building-Mounted Signs. Building-mounted signs may be placed on
any wall not facing an adjacent residential zone. Building-mounted signs may not extend
above the top ofthe eaves or parapet and may not be located on a roof. For buildings
occupied by a single entity business, the total building-mounted sign area shall not exceed
20% of the area of the building elevation facing a public street to a maximum of two
hundred and fifty (250) square feet for on each building elevation which faces a public
street. In buildings occupied by more than one entity business, the total building-mounted
si gn area for each entity's business signagc may shall not exceed 20 % of that entity's
business's portion of the building elevation facing a public street ocwpied by said Glltity to a
maximum of tw'o hundred and fifty (250) square feet.
2. Freestanding Signs. One point menry-fi ve and one quarter (1.25)
square feet of freestanding visible sign area ~ shall be allowed for every one ill lineal foot
of arterial street frontage of the site, provided that the maximum area of any freestanding
sign face does not exceed half of the maximum visible sign area. "Visible sign alea" is
defined as the total of all fice-stcmdil1g sign faces visible [10m any Olle location. The
maximum visible sign area for a particular site shall be as follows:
Site Size Area Maximum Visible Sign Area
Less than .50 acre 100 square feet
.50 to .99 acre 200 square feet
1 to 1.99 acres 300 square feet
2 to 2.99 acres 400 square feet
3 acres or more 500 square feet
l.. Off-Premise Signs. One off-premise OtltdOOl advertising signs
containing a commercial message unrelated to any use or activity of the property on which
the sign is located. including billboards and other outdoor advertising signs not exceeding
six hundred (600) square feet in total sign area, shall bc plOhibitcd may be permitted on any
sites whieh that does not contain signagc any sign for tenants 01 businesses located on said
sites. subiect to approval of a conditional use permit.
4. Shopping Malls. The total sign area for a shopping mall facade shall
not exceed 20% of the facade or three hundred (300) square feet. whichever is less. Signs
may be placed on any facade of a shopping mall. provided the maximum allowable sign area
of that facade is not exceeded. and the sign is part of a master sign permit in the name of the
manager of the mall that identifies all of the signs for the shopping mall. Where all portions
ofthe shopping mall are more than fifteen (15) feet from the street right-of-way. one
freestanding sign per street frontage. with a maximum of two (2) such signs per site. may be
installed. provided that each sign shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in height and two
hundred (200) square feet in total area. or one hundred (100) square feet in area per side:
provided. however. that for those signs containing over one hundred (100) square feet of
sign area. the display surfaces shall be parallel and back-to-back to each other: and further
provided that the sign area shall be included in the total permitted sign area for the facade on
that same street frontage.
.
June 17,2002
184
Page 9
14.36.070
2... Pennants. flags. flyers. ribbons. balloons. or other fluttering devices or
strings of such devices. which are used to attract attention to outdoor sales lots of new and
used dealerships of automobiles. trucks. trailers. motorcycles. recreational vehicles. tractors.
boats.
C. Signs in the Community Shopping District (CSD) Zone. Signs may be
lighted but not intermittent or flashing type. All signs over ten (10) square feet in area shall
be restricted to territory no closer than 100 feet to all residential property in a residential
zone. Maximum height shall be 30 feet. Such signs may be wall signs. marquee signs.
pedestrian signs. freestanding signs. projecting signs. or any combination thereof. subiect to
the following standards: Maximum Sign Alea.
.L. Building-Mounted Signs. Building-mounted signs may be placed on
any wall not facing an adjacent residential zone. Building-mounted signs may not extend
above the top of the eaves or parapet and may not be located on a roof. For buildings
occupied by a single entity business, the total building-mounted sign area shall not exceed
10% of the area of the building elevation facing a public street to a maximum of ~
hundred and twenty-five (125) square feet po ~igl1 on each building elevation which faces a
public street. In buildings occupied by more than one entity business, the total building-
mounted sign area for each entity' ~ business ~ignage may shall not exceed 10 % of the
entity'~ that business's portion ofthe building elevation facing a public street occupied by
~aid entity to a maximum of one hundred and twenty-five (125) square feet.
2. Freestanding Signs. One and one quarter (1.25) square feet of
freestanding visible sign area is shall be allowed for every one ill lineal foot of arterial
street frontage of the site, provided that the maximum area of any freestanding sign face
does not exceed half of the maximum visible sign area. "Visibk ~igh Mea" i~ defined a~ the.
total of all flec-~tanding ~igll face~ yi~ibk floIn any Ol1C location. The maximum visible
sign area for a particular site shall be as follows: ,"
Site 51tt Area Maximum Visible Sign Area
Less than 1 acre 50 square feet
1 to 1.99 acres 75 square feet
2 to 2.99 acres 100 square feet
3 acres or more 125 square feet
1.. Off-Premise Signs. Off-premise outdOOl adyerti~ing signs, including
billboards, shall be prohibited within the Community Shopping District Zone.
I2.. Signs in the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) Zone. Signs may be lighted,
but not intermittent or flashing type, and shall not exceed one hundred (100) square feet in
total sign area. All signs over ten (10) square feet in area shall be restricted to territory no
closer than 100 feet to all residential property in a residential zone. Maximum height shall
be 20 feet. No Off-premise signs. including bi11boards~ shall be pcunitte.d prohibited within
the Commercial Neighborhood Zone.
E. Signs in the Commercial Office (CO) Zone. Signs may be lighted. but not
intermittent or flashing type. and shall not exceed :fi..fu (50) square feet in total sign area,
provided, however, that if the site area is 14,000 square feet or gleMCI more, then tile total
allo yy abk sign~ al ea may be in"l ea~ed to shall not exceed one hundred (100) square feet in
total sign area. No more than:fi..fu (50) square feet oflighted signage area may face
June 17, 2002
Page 10
185
.
.
.
.
14.36.070
.
residential property in a residential zone located directly across a street. All freestanding
signs shall not exceed five ill feet in height. All ot11el Building-mounted signs shall not
exceed 30 feet in height. Off-premise signs. including billboards. shall be prohibited within
the Commercial Office Zone.
F. Signs in the Industrial Park (IP) Zone.
1. One business building-mounted sign fOJ each wall ~ not to exceed one
ill square foot for each one (1) horizontal lineal foot of the building wall or three hundred
(300) square feet, whichever is less, shall be permitted for each building elevation facing a
public or private street.
2. One detached freestanding business sign, not to exceeding fifteen (15)
feet in height al!d thirty-five (35) square feet in area and fifteen (15) feet in height, shall be
permitted for each business site.
3. Public and private directional, traffic, and warning attached and
detached signs shall not exceed six (6) square feet in area.
4. Signs may be lighted, but not intermittent or flashing.
~ Off-premise signs. including billboards. shall be prohibited within the
Industrial Park Zone.
G. Signs in the Industrial Light (IL) Zone.
1. One business building-mounted sign fm each wall ~ not to exceed one
ill square foot for each one (1) horizontal lineal foot of the building wall or three hundred
(300) square feet, whichever is less, shall be permitted for each building elevation facing a
public or private street.
2. One detached freestanding business sign, not to exceeding fifteen (15)
feet in hcigltt and thirty-five (35) square feet in area and fifteen (15) feet in height, shall be
permitted for each business site.
3. Public and private directional, traffic, and warning attached and
detached signs shall not exceed six (6) square feet in area.
3. Signs may be lighted, but not intermittent or flashing.
4. One off-premise sign containing a commercial message unrelated to
any use or activity of the property on which the sign is located. including billboards and
other outdoor advertising signs not exceeding six hundred (600) square feet in total sign
area. may be permitted on any site that does not contain any sign for businesses located on
said site. subiect to approval of a conditional use permit.
H. Signs in the Industrial Heavy (IH) Zone.
1. One building-mounted sign, not to exceed one (1) square foot for each
one (1) horizontal lineal foot of the building wall or four hundred (400) square feet,
whichever is less, shall be permitted for each building elevation facing a public or private
street.
2. One freestanding sign, not to exceed one hundred (100) square feet in
area and thirty-five (35) feet in height, shall be permitted for each business site.
3. Signs may be lighted, but not intermittent or flashing.
.
June 17,2002
186
Page 11
14.36.070
14.36.080 .
4. One off-premise sign containing a commercial message unrelated to
any use or activity of the property on which the sign is located. including billboards and
other outdoor advertising signs not exceeding six hundred (600) square feet in total sign
area. may be permitted on any site that does not contain any sign for businesses located on
said site. subiect to approval of a conditional use permit.
1. Signs in the Public Buildings and Parks (PBP) Zone. One building-mounted
sign per ~tltlGttlIG building shall be permitted; provided that ~ the sign i~ a maximum
hei~ht of 20 feet and no 1m: gel than does not exceed one hundred (100) square feet in total
sign area; and is unlighted; provi~ed further that intermittent or flashing lights lighted signs
are prohibited. 9ne freestanding sign per site shall be permitted: provided that the sign does
not exceed one hundred (100) square feet in total sign area. Sign~age shall be placed so as
not to impact a facing residential zone. Maximum height shall be 20 feet. Off-premise
signs. including billboards, shall be prohibited within the Public Buildings and Parks Zone.
J. Temporary Commercial Event Signs. The total sign area of temporary
commercial event signs that are intended to advertise a special event such as a new business
grand opening. going-out-of- business sale. or similar special sales event shall not exceed
one hundred (100) square feet for a business. provided the temporary commercial event
signs are removed within one (1) day after the event and are not up for more than one (1)
month commencing at the date of installation and not up for more than three (3) months in
any calendar year: except that this Section shall not allow the type of signs that are
specifically prohibited by Section 14.36.080 of this Chapter.
K. A-Frame Signs. One A-frame sign that is no larger than six (6) square feet
per side and no higher than thirty (30) inches from ground level shall be permitted per site as
a freestanding sign. provided that such A-frame signs shall be securely anchored to the
-ground to prevent overturning due to wind or being moved to an unpermitted location. A- u
, frame signs shall not be located in public rights-of-way. except where a building is built to
the front lot line and provided the sign owner obtains a right-of-way use permit and names
the City as an insured on the sign owner's insurance policy indemnifying the City.
.
14.36.080 Prohibited Signs. The following signs are prohibited in the City:
A. All signs illuminated by, or containing, blinking, flashing, intermittent, or
moving lights; all flashing, rotating, or intermediate lights in, on, or around windows, roof
lines, or building exteriors; provided that electronically changing message and digital
time/temperature signs. which do not change the message more than once per 30 seconds
nor and the moving hands of a clock otherwise allowed under this Chapter shall not be
prohibited. This Section shall not prohibit seasonal decorations.
B. All roof-mounted signs, including any signs painted directly on the roof
surface.
C. All ~tling~ of pennants, banners flags, flyers, ribbons, balloons. or other
fluttering devices or strings of such devices. which are used to attract attention for
commercial purposes; provided that such devices may be displayed to make notice of the
opening or closing of a business for a period not to exceed ten (10) days and except as .
permitted in Sections 14.36.050(M) and 14.36.070(B). This Section shall not prohibit
June 17, 2002
187
Page 12
.
14.36.080
14.36.090
.
seasonal decorations~ 01 ~ca~onal ba:nllcl~. or other distinctive noncommercial displays
affixed to light poles. or other public standard. by the City or non-profit organizations.
D. Billboards and other off-premise outdoor advertising signs. except in
compliance with Sections 14.36.070(B). (G). and (H) of this Chapter. provided that such
signs shall not be directed toward any shoreline subiect to Chapter 15.08 P AMC.
E. Temporary signs located on or resting against a motor vehicle, trailer,
bicycle, planter, or decorator card for the purpose of advertisement or directing people to a
business.
F. All signs which purport to call attention to a business or building with words
such as "look", "stop", "slow down", or other words oflike import or which are similar to
traffic signals or signs.
G. All moving, rotating, or animated signs, except barber poles.
H. All signs which no longer serve an ongoing business.
I. All signs which have no permanent attachment to a building or the ground,
including but not limited to A-frame signs, sandwich board signs. pole attachments, and
other mobile signs~ provided that signs painted on vehicles which are not parked in a manner
directing people to a business are not prohibited. and further provided that A-frame signs as
exempted in Section 14.36.050(J) or permitted in Section 14.36.070(K) and sandwich board
signs as exempted in Section 14.36.050(0) are not prohibited.
J. Projecting signs that project further than four and one-half (4-1/2) feet from
the building facade; provided that signs occurring under marquees or awnings shall be
governed by the requirements for pedestrian signs in Section 14.36.070(A)(3) ofthis
Chapter.
K. All signs not specifically addressed herein and contrary to the provisions of
this Chapter. (Ord. 2542 95, 7/30/89; Ord. 2182 g4, 12/15/81; Ord. 2152 ~7, 7/1/81.)
.
14.36.090 Removal of Prohibited and Nonconforming Signs.
A. The Building Division shall notify the business owner and the sign owner or
lessee and the owner of the property of each sign that is either a prohibited or
nonconforming sign under the terms of this Chapter, and the sign shall be removed within
thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice from the Building Division.
B. If a sign advertises a business no longer existing or a product no longer sold
on the premises for the previous 365 days, it shall be removed within thirty (30) days of
receipt of the notice from the Building Division.
C. If the sign is not removed within the thirty (30) day period, the City may
remove or cause to be removed the prohibited or noncomplying sign and place a lien against
the property for the cost of such removal.
D. Any sign which is of a type of sign permitted under Section 14.36.070 of this
Chaptel, but which docs not GOnfoun to ~pccifie. lc,quile.nlcnt~ for that ~pc, of sign, and or
which was legally erected before existing on Janua1J 1, 1982 July 22. 2002, shall be
classified as a legal nonconforming sign; and may remain in use until ~ix (G) months aftcr
date. of adoption of this ChaptcI b:y th" City Council. (Ord. 2G04 Sl, 7/14/90, Old. 2580
SI, 4/25/90, Old. 2542 SG, 7/30/89, Old. 2182 S5, 12/14/81, Old. 2152 S'J, 7/1/81.)
June 17,2002
188
Page 13
14.36.090 .
14.36.100
E. An)' sign which is prohibited OJ of a type of sign pcrmittc.d under Section
14.JG.070 of this Chapter, but which docs not eOrtlorlll to specific rcquir{;lflclrts fOI tllat rype
of sign as a result of rezoning to Centr al D tlsiness Dish iet or amendm"nts to this ChapteI
subsequent to Jtll, 1,1989, shall be cith"r r"moved or madc to eonf-ollll to the lCquirenlents
of tllis Chapter 011 thc fiftll ((mli vcr sar)' of tk effecti v e date. of 111\: !Crolle or t1.e alflc,ndlhcrrt,
except that back-lit marquce or awning sighs shall be either removed 01 made to COnfOlll1
within six (G) months ofthc effective date of the alllendment. (Ord. 2604 Sl, 7/14/90; Ord.
2580 Sl, 4/25/90; Ord. 2542 S6, 7/30/89; Ord. 218295, 12/14/81; Ord. 215299,7/1181.)
14.36.100 Variances.
A. When the strict enforcement of these regulations may impose an excessive
hardship upon any applicant, depriving him of signage rights extended to other parties under
this Chapter, then a variance from these regulations may be requested.
B. Variance applications shall be made to the Board of Adjustment.
C. A variance application shall be submitted on a form obtained from the
Plamling Department of Community Development. It shall be made by the owner or lessee
of a sign or the owner of the property and shall be acknowledged by the owner of the
property, if other than the applicant.
D. Upon receipt of an application satisfying the requirements of this Section, the
Planning Department of Community Development shall route the same to all appropriate
Departments. Each Department shall submit to the Planning Department of Community
Development recommendations and comments regarding the application. The Plamlihg
Department of Community Development shall prepare a report to the Board of Adjustment
summarizing the factors involved, the recommendations of other Departments, and the
Plannillg Department of Community Development recommendation and findings. A copy of
the report shall be mailed to the applicant and copies shall be made available, at cost, for use
by any interested party.
E. Upon receipt of an application satisfying the requirements of this Section, the
Planning Department of Community Development shall schedule a public hearing before the
Board of Adjustment. Notice of such public hearing shall be posted at the site of the
proposal by the Planning Department of Community Development at least ten days prior to
the hearing and published two times at least three days apart in a newspaper of general
circulation, except that the final notice to be published in the newspaper shall not be more
than three days prior to the date of the hearing.
F. Prior to making a recommendation on an application for a variance, the
Board shall hold at least one public hearing. The Board's determination for approval, denial,
or approval with modifications or conditions shall be recorded in the minutes in written
form with findings based upon compliance with subdivisions (1) and (2) of this subsection
as follows:
1. Every variance shall comply with at least one of the following
criteria:
a. The size of the building is such that the twenty per-cent
maximum permitted sign area would result in a sign that is too small to read from either side
June 17,2002
Page 14
189
.
.
.
14.36.100
14.36.130
of the public rights-of-way adjacent to the building facade or from recognized pedestrian or
marine routes;
b. The location of the building and entrance is such that the
proposed sign would not be readable from public rights-of-way or recognized pedestrian or
marine routes;
c. The building facade or other features, such as marquees, is
such that no practical location in which to construct a conforming sign exists.
2. Every variance shall comply with all of the following criteria:
a. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public interest;
b. The variance shall not be detrimental to abutting properties;
c. The variance shall not be inconsistent with the purpose of this
Chapter. (Ord. 2152 ~10, 7/1/81.)
.
14.36.110 Notice. Any notice required to be given by this Chapter shall be given
either to the owner or lessor of a sign, or to the owner of the property on which the sign is
located. In the event notice is given to the owner or lessor of a sign, the notice shall be
given either by personal service or by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the name of
the owner or lessor, as shown on the application for a sign permit. If there is no application
for a sign permit on file with the City, the notice shall be given, either by personal service or
by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the person in whose name the property stands,
according to the records of the Clallam County Assessor. (Ord. 2152 ~11, 7/1/81.)
14.36.120 Enforcement.
A. It shall be the duty of the Building InSpCGtoI Official to enforce all provisions
of this Chapter.
B. No oversight or dereliction on the part of the Building IllSpC(,tOI Official or
any official or employee ofthe City vested with the duty or authority to issue permits or
licenses, nor issuance of a license in conflict with the provisions of this Chapter, shall
legalize, authorize, waive or excuse the violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter,
nor shall it estop the City from enforcing the terms of this Chapter. Any permit or license
issued in violation of this Chapter shall be null and void.
C. In the event any person, firm, or corporation shall use, erect, construct, move,
or alter, or attempt to use, erect, construct, move, or alter any sign in violation of the
provisions of this Chapter, the same is declared a public nuisance, against which the City
may prosecute an action in a court of competent jurisdiction seeking an injunction against
the continuation of such nuisance. (Ord. 2152 ~12, 7/1/81.)
.
14.36.130 Violation - Penalty. Any person violating any provision of this Chapter is
guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars,
or ninety days injail, or both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation
continues shall constitute a separate offense. (Ord. 2152 ~13, 7/1/81.)
14.36B2.wpd
June 17,2002
190
Page 15
.
.
.
191
.
A TT ACHMENT C
Chapter 14.40
REVISED USES -- PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
.
14.40.030 Parking Space Requirements - Commercial.
A. Automobile service stations and repair shops shall provide a minimum of
three parking spaces plus one parking space per each mechanical service bay.
B. Baked goods shops. pizza-to-go shops. and other prepared food outlets with
no consumption of food and beverages on the premises shall provide one parking space for
each three hundred square feet of floor area of the building.
C. Banks, business, professional, and governmental offices shall provide one
parking space for each four hundred square feet of floor area of the building.
D. Barber and beauty shops, tanning salons, therapeutic massage clinics, and
other similar personal care establishments shall provide two parking spaces per station.
E. Bowling alleys shall provide six parking spaces for each alley.
F. Child care services or day care centers, as defined in Chapter 388-73 WAC,
as now enacted or hereafter amended, shall provide two parking spaces plus one unloading
space for those services or centers serving twelve or fewer children, and one parking space
per employee plus two parking spaces for unloading, for those services or day care centers
serving more than twelve children.
G. Churches, mortuaries, and funeral homes shall provide one parking space for
each six seats in the chapel (additional uses such as schools and residences may require
separate parking spaces).
H. Convenience stores. delicatessens. and food stores (Jess than 3.000 square
feet in building area) shall provide one parking space for each three hundred square feet of
floor area of the building.
1. ,Dance halls and video arcades shall provide one parking space for each fifty
square feet of floor area of the building.
J. Fo'O'd Grocery stores, supermarkets.. and shopping centers shall provide one
parking space for each three hundred square feet of floor area of the building, with a
minimum of ten parking spaces.
K. Furniture and appliance stores shall provide one parking space per six
hundred square feet of floor area of the building.
L. Hotels and motels shall provide one parking space for each sleeping unit.
M. Medical, optometrical, chiropractic. and dental clinics and/or offices shall
provide six parking spaces for each doctor. optometrist. or chiropractor.
.
June 17,2002
Page 1
192
L. Othe-l Ie-tail e-stablislm1e-ltts, such as ha:rd~a:re- stOles, household C,qUipluCrrt,
SCl v ice shops, clothing cl11d sho(, 1 epail shops, shall pIO v ide one pal king space- fOl each tlll ec .
hundled square feet offloOl area oftlle building, ~ith a IJlininmln of six spaces.
M. rl(~skal therapy al1d other similar pe-rsonal sel v ice- uses shall plO v ide two
palking spaces fOl each operator.
N. Research, biochemical, X-ray, and dental laboratories shall provide one
parking space for each two hundred square feet of floor area.
O. Restaurants, taverns, and any other establishment for the sale and
consumption on the premises of food, alcoholic beverages, or refreshments shall provide one
parking space for each one hundred twenty-five square feet of floor area of the building, with
a minimum often spaces.
P. ether Retail establishments. such as hardware stores. household equipment
rental outlets. service shops. clothing and shoe re-pair ~d10PS stores. general merchandise
stores. and department stores. shall provide one parking space for each three hundred square
feet of floor area of the building. with a minimum of six spaces.
Q. Skating rinks and other commercial recreation ~ facilities shall provide
one parking space for each two hundred square feet of floor area of the building or covered
area. Outdoor commercial recreation facilities shall provide parking spaces as determined
by Planning Commission review.
R. Specialty shops. such as antique. art supplies. bicycle. book. candy and ice
cream. coffee and espresso. computer. flowers. gift. hobby and toy. iewelry. kayak. pet. and
video rental. shall provide one parking space for each three hundred square feet of floor area
of the building. .
S. Telephone exchanges and telemarketing offices shall provide one parking
space for each employee, with a minimum of six spaces.
T. Theaters shall provide one parking space for each three theater seats.
S. Tltlcking and t1anspol'tation telminals sllall pia v ide a minimum of ten
pal king spa~cs.
T. Wholesale stales, ~Me.houses, stolage. buildings and motOI vehidcs or
macmne-ry sales stOICS shall provide one parking space fOl each two cmployees, ~ith a
minin1um oftcn parking spaces. (Ord. 2787 ~4, 12/28/93; Ord. 2228 ~3, 8/31/82; Grd. 1588
~3, 6/15/66.)
14.40.040 Parking Space Requirements - Industrial.
A. Dance halls. adult entertainment business establishments. and video arcades
shall provide one parking space for each fifty square feet of floor area of the building.
B. Manufacturing uses, including creameries, soft drink bottling establishments,
bakeries, canneries, printing and engraving shops, pre-fabricated parts assembly plants. and
other light industrial plants shall provide one parking space for each three employees, with a
minimum of ten parking spaces.
June 17, 2002
Page 2
.
193
.
C. Manufacturing uses. including sawmills. paper mills. pulp mills. wood
products mills. raw material processing plants. and other heavy industrial plants shall
provide one parking space for each three employees. with a minimum often parking spaces.
D. Trucking. transportation. and distribution terminals shall provide one parking
space for each two employees. with a minimum often parking spaces.
E. Wholesale stores. warehouses. storage buildings and motor vehicles or
machinery sales stores shall provide one parking space for each two employees. with a
minimum often parking spaces. (Ord. 222894,8/31/82; Ord. 158894,6/15/66.)
.
14.40.050 Parking Space Requirements - Public and Institutional Uses.
A. Auditoriums. stadiums. sports arenas. and other places of assembly with fixed
seating shall provide one parking space for each three seats.
B. Clubs, flatemal societies, places of assembly, and exhibition halls without
fixed seating sh~ll provide one parking space for each fifty square feet of floor area of the
building.
C. Fire and police stations shall provide parking spaces as determined by
Planning Commission review.
D. Hospitals shall provide one parking space for each bed.
E. Libraries shall provide one parking space for each two hundred square feet of
floor area, with a minimum often spaces.
F. Museums shall provide one parking space for each three hundred square feet
of floor area.
G. Outdoor sports areas or pat'b fields without fixed seats shall provide parking
spaces as determined by Planning Commission review.
H. Parks and playgrounds shall provide parking spaces as determined by
Planning Commission review.
I. Preschools and kindergartens day care centers shall provide a mihinmm often
one parking spaces for each adult teacher. care giver. and assistant and two loading!
unloading parking spaces.
J. Public and private golf clubs shall provide a minimum of forty parking
spaces.
K. Public swimming pools shall provide ten parking spaces for each one
thousand square feet of pool surface area.
L. Riding academies shall provide one parking space for each one hundred
square feet of floor stable area.
M. Elementary Schools (Elementary) shall provide one parking space for each
classroom.
N. JuniOl hign Schools (Middle) shall provide three parking spaces for each
classroom.
O. Senior high Schools (High) shall provide six parking spaces for each
classroom.
P. Junior colleges Schools (Colleges) shall provide eight parking spaces for each
classroom.
.
June 17,2002
Page 3
194
O. Staditll11s, sports al('M, auditoIitll1Is, and Otll('1 pla(,(,s of ass(,mbly SlIM1
plovid(, 011(, pro king space for (,(1(,h tmcc S(,MS.
Q. Senior centers shall provide one parking space for every 135 square feet of
floor area of the building. (Ord. 2683 SI, 3/27/92; Ord. 2228 S5, 8/31/82; Ord. 2184 SI,
1/1/82; Ord. 2121 S1, 2/1/81; Ord. 2028 S1, 6/17/79; Ord. 1588 S5, 6/15/66.)
.
14.40.060 Parking Space Requirements - Residential Uses.
A. Dormitories and apartment dormitories shall provide two parking spaces for
each sleeping unit.
R Home occupations shall provide parking spaces as determined by Community
Development Director.
C. Rooming and lodging houses shall provide one parking space for each
sleeping unit.
D. Nursing and convalescent homes, assisted living facilities, residential care
facilities, adult family homes, group homes, and sanitariums shall provide one tt1 parking
space for each three ffl beds.
E. Single-family, two and three family dwellings, and apartment buildings shall
provide two ffl parking spaces per dwelling unit.
F. Trailer parks shall provide two ffl parking spaces for each trailer space.
(Ord. 2948 S 1, 2/14/97; Ord. 2228 S6, 8/31/82; Ord. 2081 S 1, 6/1/80; Ord. 2028 S2,
6/17/79; Ord. 1588 S6, 6/15/66.)
14.40.070 Parking Space Requirements - Unspecified Uses. If a use is not otherwise .
specifically mentioned in Sections 14.40.030 through 14.40.060 of this Chapter, the
requirements for off-street parking facilities shall be the same as the requirements for off-
street parking of the use which, as determined by the Planning Director, has the most similar
parking need and land use characteristics. (Ord. 2228 S7, 8/31/82; Ord. 1588 S7, 6/15/66.)
14.40.090 Mixed Uses. In the case ofa mixture of uses on one zoning lot or in one
building, the total requirements for off-street parking facilities shall be the sum of the
requirements for the various uses computed separately. Off-street parking facilities for one
use shall not be considered as providing required parking facilities of any other use, except
as may be provided in Section 14.40.100 of this Chapter. (Ord. 2228 S9, 8/31/82; Ord. 1588
S9, 6/15/66.)
14.40.100 Cooperative Provisions. Parking facilities may be cooperatively used by
different land uses, when the times of the use of such parking spaces by each use are
nonsimultaneous. (Ord. 2228 SlO, 8/31/82; Ord. 2121 S2, 2/1/81; Ord. 1588 S10, 6/15/66.)
14.40Rwpd
.
June 17,2002
Page 4
195
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT D
Sections:
16.04.010
16.04.020
16.04.030
16.04.040
16.04.045
16.04.050
16.04.060
16.04.070
16.04.080
16.04.090
16.04.100
16.04.110
16.04.120
16.04.130
16.04.140
16.04.150
16.04.160
16.04.170
16.04.180
16.04.190
16.04.200
16.04.210
16.04.220
16.04.010
16.04.020
Chapter 16.04
SHORT SUBDIVISION REGULA nONS
Purpose and Intent.
Authority.
Definitions.
Applicability.
Parcels Traversed by Public Ways
Application Forms.
Preliminary Short Plat - Contents.
Preliminary Short Plat - Design Standards.
Preliminary Short Plat - Routing and Staff Recommendations.
Preliminary Short Plat - Requirements for Approval.
Preliminary Short Plat - Approval - Conditions.
Preliminary Short Plat - Approval - Effect.
Appeals.
Final Short Plat - Filing Time Limit.
Final Short Plat - Improvements - Required.
Final Short Plat - Improvements - Bond in Lieu When.
Final Short Plat - Contents.
Final Short Plat - Routing for Review.
Final Short Plat - Final Approval Procedure.
Final Short Plat - Filing and Recordation.
Resubdivision by Short Plat Prohibited - Time Limit.
Injunctive Action to Enforce Chapter.
Violation - Penalty.
16.04.010 Purpose and Intent. The purpose ofthis Chapter is to provide uniform regulations
for the subdivision and resubdivision of land into four or less parcels, so as to promote the public
health, safety and general welfare. It is further the purpose of this Chapter to implement the
requirements of the Growth Management Act of 1990 through the goals, policies, and objectives of
the Comprehensive Plan of the City, to comply with the requirements ofthe Zoning Code and Urban
Services Ordinance of the City, to ensure orderly growth consistent with the desired urban design
of the City, to promote effective and energy-efficient use of land, to prevent over-crowding of land,
to provide for adequate light and air, to promote safe and convenient travel and lessen congestion
on streets and highways, to provide for proper ingress and egress, to ensure adequate provision for
open spaces, drainage ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation areas, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and safe walking conditions
on school routes, and other public requirements, to require uniform monumenting of land
subdivisions and conveyancing by accurate legal description, and to prevent the creation of public
nuisances. COrd. 2880 Sl (part), 8/25/95; Ord. 2222 Sl, 8/11/82.)
16.04.020 Authority. This Chapter is adopted pursuant to the authority granted to the City
by the Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17.060. COrd. 2222 S2, 8/11/82.)
19t5
2/00
16.04.030
16.04.045
16.04.030 Definitions.
A. "Block" means a group of lots, tracts or parcels within well-defined and fixed
boundaries.
B. "City" means the City of Port Angeles.
C. "Community Development Department or Department" means the Community
Development Department of the City.
De. "Comprehensive Plan" means a Comprehensive Plan adopted by the Council in
compliance with the Growth Management Act of 1990 and which indicates the general locations
recommended for residential, commercial, and industrial land uses or zones and for streets, parks,
public buildings, and other public improvements. The Comprehensive Plan includes all its
Appendices and individual comprehensive service and facility plans such as the Capital Facilities
Plan. the Comprehensive Water Plan and the Comprehensive Parks Plan.
EB. "Dedication" means the deliberate appropriation ofland by an owner for public uses,
reserving to the owner no other rights than such as are compatible with the full exercise and
enjoyment of the public uses to which the property has been devoted. The intention to dedicate shall
be evidenced by the owner by the presentment for filing of a final short plat showing the dedication
thereon, and acceptance of the dedication by the City shall be evidenced by the approval of such final
short plat.
F. "Desired urban design of the City" means the land use pattern and street system as
described by the Comprehensive Plan land use map and policies. the zoning map and regulations.
the subdivision regulations. and the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines.
GE. "Final short plat" means the final drawing of the short subdivision, containing all the
elements and requirements set forth in this Chapter.
HE "Lot" means a fractional part of divided land with fixed boundaries. The term shall
include tracts or parcels.
16. "Planning Commission or Commission" means the Planning Commission of the City,
as designated in Chapter 2.36 of this Code.
II. "Planning Department" means the Planning DepartnlGllt of the Cit}.
Jl "Preliminary short plat" means an approximate drawing of a short subdivision
showing the general layout of streets and alleys, lots, blocks and other elements of the short
subdivision.
Kl. "Short subdivision" means the division or redivision of land into four or less lots,
tracts, parcels, sites or divisions for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer of ownership. (Ord. 2880
~ 1 (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 2222 ~3, 8/11/82.)
16.04.040 Applicability. A final short plat, approved in accordance with the provisions of
this Chapter and filed with the County Auditor, is required for all short subdivisions within the City,
and no lot, tract, or parcel within any short subdivision shall be sold, leased, transferred, redivided,
altered, or vacated, without compliance with the terms of this Chapter. (Ord. 2880 ~ 1 (part)
8/25/95; Ord. 2222 ~4, 8/11/82.)
16.04.045 Parcels Traversed by Public Ways. Public streets, roads, highways, alleys, and
other public ways, which traverse a parcel of land under one ownership, will be considered to have
divided that land into non-contiguous pieces without further need for complying with short
subdivision requirements. (Ord. 2793, ~1, 2/11194)
6/1 7/02
1~-7
.
.
.
.
.
.
16.04.050
16.04.070
16.04.050 Application Forms.
A. An application for approval of a preliminary short plat shall be submitted to the
Planlling Community Development Department on a form furnished by that Department and shall
be accompanied by the preliminary short plat.
B. The application form shall contain, at minimum:
1. The name, address and telephone number of the applicant and the property
owner;
2. A legal description of the property to be subdivided;
3. A statement of the underlying zoning;
4. The proposed methods of serving the individual lots in the short subdivision
with water, sewer, streets and other public utilities;
5. The purpose of the short subdivision; and
6. If requested by the PhtIDling Department, the name, address and telephone
number of the owner(s) of all adjacent unplatted parcels.
C. The application form shall be accompanied by six copies ofthe preliminary short plat,
the application fee and, if applicable, a SEP A checklist.
D. The short subdivision application fee shall be as established by ordinance and set
forth in Chapter 3.70 P AMC. No such fee shall be refundable after acceptance of an application by
the Plcmnillg Department. (Ord. 2789 911, 1/1/94; Ord. 2222 95,8/11/82.)
16.04.060 Preliminary Short Plat - Contents. The preliminary short plat shall be a neat
drawing, in ink, to a scale of not less than one inch to one hundred feet, on eight and one-half by
eleven inch or larger paper, and shall provide the following information:
A. The date, scale, and North arrow;
B. The boundaries of the entire parcel being subdivided, including all contiguous
unplatted property owned by the subdivider;
C. A legal description of the property being subdivided;
D. Identification, dimensions, and area of all proposed lots;
E. The name and location of existing and proposed public rights-of-way;
F. The location of existing and proposed easements;
G. The required building setbacks on each proposed lot;
H. The location of existing buildings and major structures and their distances from
property lines;
I. The location of existing natural features, such as streams, rivers, wetlands, shorelines,
drainage ways, ravines and steep slopes;
J. The location and size of existing utilities, including water, sewer, storm drains, and
fire hydrants. (Ord. 2880 91 (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 2222 96, 8/11/82.)
16.04.070 Preliminary Short Plat - Design Standards. All preliminary short plats shall
conform to the following design standards:
A. Right-of- Way Access.
1. Each lot shall abut on a dedicated, improved and maintained City street. Such
street shall connect directly to an existing improved street that meets current street improvement
standards as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, the Urban Services Ordinance, and the Urban
Services Standards and Guidelines promulgated consistent with and pursuant to P AMC 18.08.040
and 18.08.130.
11~8
2/00
16.04.070
2. Ifthc abutting any right~-of-way abutting the property being subdivided does not meet
minimum width standards, additional right-of-way shall be required in accordance with the standards as set
forth in the Comprehensive Plan. the Urban Services Ordinance. and the Urban Services Standards and
Guidelines promulgated consistent with and pursuant to P AMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.130 Icquilcmcnts of
thc Public Worb Dcpartnlcnt.
3. An exception from the right-of-way access requirements in this section shall be
allowed for a single lot within a proposed short plat, provided that the following conditions are met:
a. the single lot contains an existing habitable dwelling that alrcady abuts and
is accessible by emergency vehicles over an existing 20-foot-wide, all-weather street that does not meet City
standards and ahcady contains a habitable d~d]ing, and
b. all other lots in the short subdivision shall meet the right-of-way access
standards of this section.
4. Sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for
students who only walk to and from school shall be provided pursuant to RCW 58.17.060 and RCW
58.17.110.
B. Lot Design.
1. The minimum area shall be equal to or greater than that required by the Zoning Code
as now enacted or hereafter amended.
2. The minimum depth shall be the total distance between the required front and rear
yard setbacks plus fifteen feet.
3. The minimum width, measured at the mid-point between the front and rear yard
setback lines, shall be as required by the Zoning Code as now enacted or hereafter amended.
4. The front lot line shall be the boundary of a lot which abuts a street. On a panhandle,
flag, or dogleg lot, the front lot line and setbacks shall be determined during the short subdivision process,
or, if not determined during short subdivision review, shall be determined by the Planning Community
Development Director.
5. a. Panhandle, flag, or dogleg lots may be permitted if the original parcel has
insufficient width to reasonably provide each lot with a dedicated right-of-way occurring within the interior
of the plat and if there is no reasonable likelihood that standard rights-of-way could be provided in
cooperation with abutting properties.
b. Each such panhandle, flag, or dogleg lot shall meet the following criteria:
i. The panhandle shall have a minimum width of twenty feet and shall
.
.
serve no more than one lot.
11. The required lot area shall not include any portion of the panhandle.
111. Dead-end access streets and/or driveways in excess of 150 feet in
length shall be provided with a turn-around which has a minimum 90- foot diameter asphaltic concrete street
or an alternative approved by the City consistent with the Urban Services Ordinance and the Uniform Fire
Code, except that an all-weather gravel surface section may be approved for turn-arounds which are
anticipated to be temporary due to the future extension of the roadway.
C. Natural Features. The lots and lot arrangement shall be such that no foreseeable difficulties
will be created, due to topography and other natural conditions, for the securing of building permits to build
on all lots in compliance with the Zoning Code and the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protection
Ordinances, as now enacted or hereafter amended, and all other app]icab1e regulations.
D. Large Lots. Where property is subdivided into lots which are of sufficient size to be
resubdivided, the lots and streets shall be arranged so as to permit later resubdivision in conformance with
the Zoning Code, as now enacted or hereafter amended, the Subdivision Regulations Ordinance, as now
enacted or hereafter amended, and this Chapter. (Ord. 3042 91 (part) 1/28/00; Ord. 2948 92 (part) 2/14/97;
Ord. 2880 91 (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 2865, 5/12/95; Ord. 2631 Sl, 3/29/91; Ord. 2222 S7, 8/11/82.)
.
6/17/02
11~9
.
.
.
16.04.080
16.04.1 00
16.04.080 Preliminary Short Plat - Routing and Staff Recommendations.
A. Upon receipt of an application and preliminary short plat satisfying the requirements of
Sections 16.04.050, 16.040.060 and 16.04.070 of this Chapter, the Planning Community Development
Department shall distribute the preliminary short plat to the following Bgepartments:
1. City Public Works & Utilities Department;
2. City Light Department,
23-. City Fire Department;
l4. Clallam County Health Department if a septic tank and drain field is to be allowed;
1,5. Any other appropriate department or agency.
B. Each Bgepartment or agency shall review the preliminary short plat and return written
recommendations for approval or disapproval of the preliminary short plat, and, if appropriate, proposed
conditions for approval, to the PI<tlming Community Development Department within twenty calendar days.
(Ord. 2880 ~ 1 (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 2222 ~8, 8/11/82.)
16.04.090 Preliminary Short Plat - Requirements for Approval. Prior to acting on the preliminary
short plat, the PI<tll1ling Community Development Director shall review the application for preliminary short
plat approval, the preliminary short plat, and any information received pursuant to Sections 16.04.050
through 16.04.080, to determine the compliance of the preliminary short plat with the following
requirements:
A. Necessary drainage ways or storm drain facilities must be adequate to serve the short
subdivision as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and Urban Services Ordinance development standards.
B. The provision of streets and rights-of-way must be adequate to serve the short subdivision
and comply with Sections 16.04.070 and 16.04.140 of this Chapter and as set forth in the Comprehensive
Plan and Urban Services Ordinance development standards.
C. Water supply and fire protection facilities must be adequate to serve the short subdivision
and comply with Section 16.04.140 of this Chapter and as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and Urban
Services Ordinance development standards.
D. Sanitary sewer facilities must be adequate to serve the short subdivision and comply with
Section 16.04.140 ofthis Chapter, and as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and Urban Services Ordinance
development standards, or a septic tank system must have been approved by the Clallam County Department
of Health.
E. The short subdivision lot arrangement must comply with the policies of the Comprehensive
Plan and further the attainment of the goals, policies, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
F. The proposed short subdivision must be compatible with existing and planned development
of the surrounding area.
G. The proposed lots must comply with the requirements of Ordinance 1709, as now enacted
or hereafter amended, and Section 16.04.070 of this Chapter. (Ord. 2880 ~ 1 (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 2222 ~9,
8/11/82.)
I 6.04.1 00 Preliminary Short Plat - Approval - Conditions.
A. Within thirty calendar days of receipt of the application, the Plal111ing Community
Development Director shall determine if appropriate provisions for the public health, safety and general
welfare of the community have been made, shall determine if any public nuisance would be created, and
shall further determine if the public use and interest will be served by approving the preliminary short plat,
based upon compliance with Sections 16.04.010, 16.04.050 and 16.04.090 of this Chapter.
B. Based upon that determination, the PI<tlllling Community Development Director shall
approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the preliminary short plat; or may return the preliminary
short plat to the applicant for modification, if significant revisions of the preliminary short plat are required.
C. The decision of the PI<tlll1ing Community Development Director shall be in writing, directed
to the applicant andlor property owner, at the address shown in the application, and shall set forth findings
of fact supporting the decision. (Ord. 2880 ~1 (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 2222 ~10, 8/11/82.)
2~b
2/00
16.04.110
16.04.140
16.04.110 Preliminary Short Plat - Approval - Effect. Approval, or approval with conditions, of a .
preliminary short plat shall authorize an applicant and/or property owner to proceed with the preparation of
the final short plat. (Ord. 2222 S 11, 8/11/82.)
16.04.120 Appeals.
A. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Planning Community Development Director
under Section 16.04.100 may appeal the decision to the City Council.
B. Appeals shall be submitted to the Planning Community Development Department in writing
within fourteen days following the date of mailing the decision to the applicant.
C. The City Council shall hear the appeal, may uphold, reverse, or modify the decision and shall
set forth written findings of fact. (Ord. 2911 S7, 3/29/96; Ord. 2880 SI (part) 8/25/95; Grd. 2222 S12,
8/11/82.)
16.04.130 Final Short Plat - Filing Time Limit.
A. Within five years of the Planning Community Development Director's approval of a
preliminary short plat, the applicant and/or property owner shall submit a final short plat to the Planning
Community Development Department which is in compliance with the approved preliminary short plat.
B. Failure to submit a proposed final short plat within the five years shall terminate the
preliminary short plat approval. (Ord. 2880 SI (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 2719 SI, 11/13/92; Ord. 2222 S13,
8/11/82.)
16.04.140 Final Short Plat - Improvements - Required. The following minimum improvements
shall be made or installed for each lot created by the short subdivision, before final short plat approval:
A. Watermains and other appurtenances necessary to provide adequate potable water supply
and fire protection as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, the Urban Services Ordinance and the Urban
Services Standards and Guidelines promulgated consistent with and pursuant to P AMC 18.08.040 and .
18.08.130;
B. Sanitary sewer or approved septic tank and drain field site;
C. Power, telephone, and all other necessary utilities.
D. Appropriate dedications or easements if required;
E. Minimum street improvement cross-section standard as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan,
the Urban Services Ordinance, and the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines:
1. Improvements to [!Outage and Local Access Streets: :rlOntagc. and Local access
streets ~ithin Cit) light-oF-way ftl1ni5hing that front or will provide access from the nearest fully improved
City street to newly created lots shall be improved to a minimum of20-foot wide asphaltic concrete street
with one 3-foot wide shoulder and one 6-foot wide shoulder for pedestrian traffic. All dead-end City streets
in excess of 150 feet in length shall be asphaltic concrete paved and provided with a turn-around consistent
with the Urban Services Ordinance, the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines, and the Uniform Fire
Code.
2. Improvements to Arterial Streets: Arterial streets that front or will provide access to;
and flont, the lots or parcels being developed shall be improved to the minimum City arterial street
improvement standards.
3. EXCEPTION: The Public Works & Utilities Department shall require the minimum
standard to be increased to match the immediately adjoining City street when the immediately adjoining City
street is more fully developed than the minimum standard. This exception shall not apply to short plats
when the City finds that there will be an economic and physical hardship in relocating public utilities and
there will be no increase in the number of lots within a subject short plat.
.
6/1 7/02
2~'-~
.
.
.
16.04.140
16.04.160
F. Road~ay Drainage ditches and/or culverts shall be provided to address existing and
anticipated storm water run-off occurring on the site and/or within the Plindpal flOntage City right~-of-way
and easements as set forth in the Urban Services Ordinance and Clearing and Grading Ordinance
development standards.
G. The subdivider shall provide a street profile acceptable to the Public Works & Utilities
Department for the pIincipal flOntage local access street~ if the final street grade has not been previously
established or accepted by the City.
H. The subdivider shall execute an L.l.D. consent and non-protest agreement or other agreement
acceptable to the City for street and utilities improvements on the Plindpal flontage local access street~
whenever required improvements are less than the City's full development standard~, as set forth in the
Comprehensive Plan. cmd the Urban Services Ordinance. and the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines
promulgated consistent with and pursuant to P AMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.130 established hj the. Cit}
EngineeI.
I. The subdivider shall provide all other public improvements as may be required ~ and set
forth in the Comprehensive Plan~ cmd the Urban Services Ordinance. and the Urban Services Standards and
Guidelines promulgated consistent with and pursuant to P AMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.130.
J. When commercially zoned property is being short platted without any increase in the number
of lots, the minimum improvements required by this Section may be made or installed after short plat
approval without the necessity of being bonded, provided that the final short plat shall be conditioned to
provide that such improvements shall be made or installed as part of the building permit process, that
vertical construction of the building shall not begin unless or until the Uniform Fire Code's fire hydrant
requirement has been met, and that the property or development shall not be occupied until such
improvements have been completed, provided further that said construction shall be noted on the final plat.
K. Sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who
only walk to and from school shall be provided pursuant to RCW 58.17.060 and RCW 58.17.110. (Ord.
3042 S1 (part) 1/28/00; Ord. 2948 S2 (part) 2/14/97; Ord. 2920, 6/14/96; Ord. 2909 SI, 3/15/96; Ord. 2880
SI (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 2631 S2, 3/29/91; Ord. 2222 S14, 8/11/82.)
16.04.150 Final Short Plat - Improvements - Bond in Lieu When. Performance bonds or other
security may be accepted in lieu of construction of the required improvements of Section 16.04.140, subject
to the approval of the City Engineer as to amount and the City Attorney as to form and content. (Ord.2880
SI (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 2222 S15, 8/11/82.)
16.04.160 Final Short Plat - Contents.
A. Upon completion of physical improvements as required by Section 16.04.140, or acceptance
of a bond under Section 16.04.150, a final short plat may be submitted for approval.
B. The final short plat shall be an eighteen-inch by twenty-four inch permanent reproducible
mylar, and shall be at a scale of not less than one hundred feet to one inch. The final short plat and six paper
copies shall be accompanied by a report containing accurate square-footage and dimensions of each lot and
block and the coordinates of each monument, a title report, and shall include a warranty that all assessments
in favor of the City have been paid. The final short plat and survey shall be based on the Washington
Coordinate System, North Zone, as adopted by the City, and shall show the following
1. A minimum of two permanent plat control monuments to which all dimensions,
bearings, azimuths and similar data on the plat are referred;
2. Permanent monuments at all comers.
3. Subdivision boundary lines, right-of-way lines, easements, lot lines with accurate
dimensions, bearings or azimuths, radii, central angles, and lengths of all curves;
2~2
2/00
16.04.160
16.04.170
4. Name and right-of-way width of each street. Any street not dedicated to the public .
must be so marked on the face of the plat;
5. Locations, dimensions, and purpose of all easements;
6. The required building setbacks on each proposed lot;
7. Required building setbacks and the location of any existing buildings and/or major
structures shall be shown on each proposed lot as well as their distances from property lines.
8. Identification of each lot;
9. Purpose for which sites are dedicated to the public;
10. Location and description of all monuments;
11. The legal description of the proposed lots.
12. The title under which the subdivision is to be recorded, true North and grid North
arrows, scale, and legend;
13. Legal description of the land to be platted;
14. Certification by registered land surveyor as to the accuracy of plat and survey;
15. Certificate by owner(s) dedicating roads, rights-of-way, easements, and any sites for
public purposes;
16. Certification of approval by:
a. The Planning Community Development Director,
b. The Public Works & Utilities Director; and
c. The Fire Chief;
17. House addresses shall be provided by the City and must be clearly shown on the short
plat at the time of approval pursuant to RCW 58.17.280.
18. Certification by the County Treasurer that all State and County taxes levied against
the land to be subdivided have been paid in full; .
19. Certification of filing by County Auditor;
20. If improvements are to be bonded rather than actually installed prior to final plat
approval, the plan shall show a notation as follows: "No occupancy of dwelling units will be allowed until
all roadway and utility improvements have been completed and approved by the City Engineer." (Ord.2948
S2 (part) 2/14/97; Ord. 2909 S2, 3/15/95; Ord. 2880 S 1 (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 2391 S 1,5/30/86; Ord. 2222
S 16, 8/11/82.)
] 6.04.170 Final Short Plat - Routing for Review.
A. Upon receipt of a final short plat, the Planning Community Development Department shall
circulate the final short plat to the following departments:
1. City Light Department,
12-. Public Works & Utilities Department;
23-. Fire Department.
B. If the final short plat complies with the requirements of this Chapter and the approved
preliminary short plat, the Bgepartment head shall signify approval by signing on the face of the final short
plat.
C. In the event the final short plat fails to comply with specific standards or conditions of
preliminary plat approval, the Bgepartment shall so notify the Planning Community Development Director
in writing. (Ord. 2391 S2, 5/30/86; Ord. 2222 S 17, 8/11/82.)
.
6/1 7/02
16 - 8
203
.
.
.
16.04.180
16.04.220
16.04.180 Final Short Plat - Final Approval Procedure.
A. Within thirty calendar days of receipt of the proposed final short plat, the Plamling
Community Development Director shall:
1. Review the final short plat for compliance with preliminary plat conditions;
2. Review the comments and recommendations of all appropriate Departments; and
3. Ascertain from the Public Works & Utilities Department that the required physical
improvements, in accordance with Section 16.04.140, have been installed or financial security has
been provided therefor.
B. If the Plalll1illg Community Development Director is satisfied that all of the above have been
met, then he shall approve the final short plat by affixing his signature to the face thereof.
C. If one or more of these requirements for approval is not met, he shall notify the applicant
and/or property owner in writing of the reasons for withholding approval of the final short plat.
D. Appeal from the Planning Community Development Director's decision shall be made in
accordance with Section 16.04.120. (Ord. 2880 S 1 (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 2222 S 18, 8111/82.)
16.04.190 Final Short Plat - Filing and Recordation. The applicant and/or property owner and/or
surveyor shall file the final short plat with the Clallam County Auditor's Office within ten calendar days of
the date of the Planning Community Development Director's approval. The final short plat shall not be
deemed approved by the City until recorded. A copy of the recorded document shall be submitted to the
Planning Community Development Department within ten calendar days of filing. (Ord. 2222 S 19,8111/82.)
16.04.200 Resubdivision by Short Plat Prohibited. Short plats may not be further divided in any
manner within a period of five years without the filing of a final plat, except that when the short plat contains
fewer than four parcels, nothing shall prevent the owner who filed the short plat from filing an alteration
within the five year period to create up to a total offour lots within the original short plat boundaries. (Ord.
2741 SI, 1/29/93; Ord. 2222 S20, 8111182.)
16.04.210 Iniunctive Action to Enforce Chapter. Whenever any parcel ofland within the City is
divided into four or less lots, tracts or parcels of land, and any person, firm, or corporation or any agent of
them sells or transfers, or offers or advertises for sale or transfer, any such lot, tract, or parcel, without
having a final short plat of such short subdivision filed for record in accordance with the terms of this
Chapter, the City Attorney shall commence an action to restrain and enjoin further sale or transfer of such
lots, tracts, or parcels, or offers for sale or transfer for such lots, tracts, or parcels, and to compel complete
compliance with all provisions of this Chapter. The cost of such action shall be taxed against the person,
firm, corporation, or agent selling or transferring the property. (Ord. 2222 S21, 8111/82.)
16.04.220 Violation - Penalty. Any person, firm, corporation, or association, or any agent of any
person, firm, corporation or association who violates any provision of this Chapter relating to the sale, offer
to sell, lease or transfer of any lot, tract, or parcel of land in a short subdivision shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and each such sale, offer for sale, lease, or transfer of each separate lot, tract, or parcel ofIand
in violation of any provision of this Chapter shall be deemed a separate and distinct offense. Each such
offense may be penalized by a fine of up to five hundred dollars or ninety days in jail. (Ord. 2222 S22,
8111/82.)
264.
2/00
16.08.010
16.08.020
Sections
16.08.010
16.08.020
16.08.030
16.08.040
16.08.045
16.08.050
16.08.060
16.08.070
16.08.080
16.08.090
16.08.100
16.08.110
CHAPTER 16.08
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
.
Purpose and Intent.
Authority and Jurisdiction.
Definitions.
Applicability.
Parcels Traversed by Public Ways.
Procedure.
Standards and Policies.
Requirements for Acceptance of Plats.
Variances.
Validity.
Enforcement and Penalties.
Plat Occupancy.
16.08.010 - Purpose and Intent.
A. PURPOSE. Land subdivision is the first step in the process of community development.
Once land has been cut up into streets, lots, and blocks and has been publicly recorded, the correction of
defects is costly and difficult. It is therefore in the interest of the public, the developer, and future property
owners that subdivisions be designed and developed in accordance with sound rules and proper minimum
standards.
The purpose of this Chapter is to provide uniform regulations for the subdivision and resubdivision
of land into five or more parcels, so as to promote the public health, safety and general welfare. It is further
the purpose of this Chapter to implement the requirements of the Growth Management Act of 1990 through .
the goals, policies, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan of the City, to comply with the requirements
of the Zoning Code and Urban Services Ordinance of the City, to ensure orderly growth consistent with the
desired urban design of the City, to promote effective and energy-efficient use of land, to prevent over-
crowding of land, to provide for adequate light and air, to promote safe and convenient travel and lessen
congestion on streets and highways, to provide for proper ingress and egress, to ensure adequate provision
for open spaces, drainage ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation
areas, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and safe walking conditions on school routes,
and other public requirements, to require uniform monumenting of land subdivisions and conveyancing by
accurate legal description, and to prevent the creation of public nuisances.
B. INTENT. It is the intent of these regulations to provide the minimum controls required to
ensure that all platting and subdivision of land in the City of Port Angeles shall be in the public interest and
shall meet minimum standards of public health and public safety. (Ord. 2880 S2 (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 1631
Sl,11/14/67.)
16.08.020 - Authority and Jurisdiction.
A. AUTHORITY. The Planning Commission is designated and assigned the administrative and
coordinating responsibilities contained herein, pursuant to the Laws of the State of Washington, for the
recommendation of approval or disapproval of plats, subdivisions and dedications.
B. JURISDICTION. The City Council shall appoint a person who shall have the authority,
duties and responsibilities of Subdivision Administrator for the City of Port Angeles. (Ord. 1631 S2,
11/14/67.)
6/1 7/02
.
2~-~
.
.
.
16.08.030
] 6.08.030 - Definitions.
A. ACCESS STREET - A street with the main function of providing access to adjacent
properties. or "local traffic."
B. BUFFER STRIP - An area or strip of land located and planted with trees and shrubs to
provide a screen between conflicting land uses. (Parks, playgrounds and the site of public buildings are
sometimes used as a buffer.)
C. COLLECTOR ARTERIAL STREET - A street which provides for movement within the
smaller areas which are often definable neighborhoods and may be bound by higher class (minor or
principal) arterials. Collector arterials serve very little "through traffic" but serve a high portion of ~local
traffic:': requiring direct access to abutting land uses.
D. COMMISSION - The City of Port Angeles Planning Commission.
E. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OR DEP AR TMENT - The City of Port
Angeles Community Development Department.
fE. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - A Comprehensive Plan adopted by the Council in compliance
with the Growth Management Act of 1990 and which indicates the general locations recommended for
residential, commercial, and industrial land uses or zones and for streets, parks, public buildings, and other
public improvements. The Comprehensive Plan includes all its Appendices and individual comprehensive
service and facility plans such as the Capital Facilities Plan. the Comprehensive Water Plan" and the
Comprehensive Parks Plan.
OF. COUNCIL - The City of Port Angeles City Council.
He. CROSSW ALK- WAY - A right-of-way dedicated to public use, ten feet or more in width,
which cuts across a block to facilitate pedestrian access to adjacent streets and properties.
IH. CUL-DE-SAC - (Court or Dead End Street) - A short street having one end open to traffic
and being permanently terminated by a vehicle turn-around.
J. DEDJCA DON - The deliberate appropriation of land by an owner for public uses. reserving
to the owner no other rights than such as are compatible with the full exercise and enioyment of the public
uses to which the property has been devoted. The intention to dedicate shall be evidenced by the owner by
the presentment for filing of a final short plat showing the dedication thereon. and acceptance of the
dedication by the City shall be evidenced by the approval of such subdivision final plat.
K. DESIRED URBAN DESIGN OF THE CITY - The land use pattern and street system as
described by the Comprehensive Plan land use map and policies. the zoning map and regulations. the
subdivision regulations. and the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines.
Lf. EASEMENT - A grant by the property owner of the use ofa strip ofland by the public, a
corporation, or persons for specific purposes.
M:f. FINAL PLAT - The final drawing of the subdivision and dedication prepared for filing for
record with the County Auditor and containing all elements and requirements set forth in this Chapter.
N*:. IMPROVEMENTS - Streets, with or without curb or gutter, sidewalks, crosswalk-ways,
water mains, sanitary and storm sewers, street trees, power and other appropriate items.
Ot. LOT - A portion of a subdivision or other parcel of land intended as a unit for transfer of
ownership or for development.
I:M. LOT FRONT - Unless otherwise specified on a plat, the narrow width of a lot which abuts
a public street shall be considered the front of said lot.
QN. MINOR ARTERIAL STREET - A street which provides for movement within the large sub-
parts prescribed by principal arterials. Minor arterials may also serve "through traffic" but provide ~
much more direct service to abutting land uses than principal arterials.
Re. OWNER - A person, firm, association, partnership, private corporation, public or quasi-
public corporation, or any combination thereof.
2~Ei
2/00
16.08.030
16.08.050
s.P. PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD) - A planned residential development
is a site specific development which has been approved by the City Council under the provisions of Chapter .
17.19 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. It may include a subdivision of land in which residential lots
are designed in clusters of individual lots with park and open space areas between clusters and in which lots
may be below the minimum lot widths and lot areas required by the Zoning Code.
I~. PRELIMINARY PLAT - An approximate drawing ofa proposed subdivision showing the
general layout of streets and alleys, lots, blocks, and other elements of the subdivision consistent with the
requirements of this Chapter.
UR:. PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL STREET - A street which provides for movement across and
between large sub-parts of an urban region and serve predominantly "through trips" with minimum direct
service to abutting land uses.
VS-. STREET - A right-of-way, dedicated to public use, which provides vehicular and pedestrian
access to adjacent properties.
WT. SKETCH - A drawing showing proposed lot-layout, building line setbacks and proposed
locations and width of str,eets, width and area of each lot, sanitary and storm drainage.
XH SUBDIVIDER - DEVELOPER - A person who undertakes the subdividing or the
resubdividing of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two or more lots or other divisions of land for the purpose,
immediate or future, of transfer of ownership or development, including all changes in street or lot lines.
YV-. SUBDIVISION - The dividing of a lot, tract or parcel of land into five or more lots or other
division of land for the purpose, immediate or future, of transfer of ownership or development, including
all changes in street or lot lines. (Ord. 2880 92 (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 1631 93, 11/14/67.)
16.08.040 - Applicability. A final subdivision, approved in accordance with the provisions of this
Chapter and filed with the County Auditor, is required for all subdivisions within the City, and no lot, tract,
or parcel within any subdivision shall be sold, leased transferred, redivided, altered, or vacated without
compliance with the terms of this Chapter. (Ord. 2880 92 (part) 8/25/95)
16.08.045 - Parcels Traversed by Public Ways. Public streets, roads, highways, alleys, and other .
public ways, which traverse a parcel of land under one ownership, will be considered to have divided that
land into non-contiguous pieces without further need for complying with subdivision requirements. (Ord.
2880 92 (part) 8/25/95)
16.08.050 - Procedure
A. PRELIMINARY STEPS. The developer shall submit a sketch of a proposed subdivision of
land to the City Planning Community Development Department for review prior to submittal of the
Preliminary Plat.
H. PRELIMINARY APPROVAL. The developer or his surveyor shall then transmit six (6) (or
more if required) copies of the Preliminary plat, together with a filing fee, to the City Planning Community
Development Department. The amount of the filing fee shall be as established by ordinance and set forth
in Chapter 3.70 PAMC. The City Plalming Community Development Department shall submit written
recommendations to the Planning Commission prior to the Commission's public hearing in which the
Preliminary plat is on its agenda.
.
6/1 7/02
2~-'
.
.
.
16.08.050
The proposed plat shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor and shall be submitted to the €ity
Plamling Community Development Department at least thirty (30) days prior to the public hearing of the
€i-ty Planning Commission.
Notice of the public hearing on a proposed plat or subdivision shall be posted by the developer in
a conspicuous place on or adjacent to the land proposed to be subdivided. Such notices shall clearly indicate
the time and place of the public hearing and shall be posted not less than ten days prior to the hearing.
The Planning Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written recommendations of
the City 9gepartments, and shall recommend either approveal or di5applovc denial and 5hall make
1 ccommcndatio115 thereon to the City Council. Within a period of ninety (90) days after a preliminary plat
has been submitted to the City Planning Community Development Department and other affected agencies,
the City Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed preliminary plat. The ninety (90) days time
period may be extended with the consent of the applicant. If an Environmental Impact Statement is required,
the ninety (90) day period shall not include the time spent preparing and circulating the EIS.
Following final action of the City Council on a preliminary plat, the Planning Community
Development Department shall notify the developer regarding changes required and the type and extent of
improvements to be made. A copy of the Comnli55ion'5 City Council's action and recommendations shall
be forwarded to the developer and to any agency submitting recommendations in regard to the preliminary
plat.
Approval of a preliminary plat shall be considered conditional approval of the preliminary plat; and
shall not constitute approval of the final plat; it shall be considered only as approval of the layout submitted
on the preliminary plat as a guide to the preparation of the final plat.
If the preliminary plat is approved by the City Council, the developer, before requesting final
approval, shall elect to install or assure installation of the improvements required by Section 16.08.070
PAMC by one of the following methods:
1. Actual installation of the required improvements, to the satisfaction and approval of
the City Engineer;
2. Furnishing to the City an assignment of a savings account or another approved
security or placing in trust, an amount equal to 150% of the cost of the improvements as determined by the
City Engineer, which assignment of savings account, other security, or trust shall assure to the City the
installation of the improvements, to the satisfaction and approval of the City Engineer. This savings
account, or other security, or trust shall be conditioned so that no amount may be removed therefrom without
prior written approval of the City, and shall further provide that, if the improvements are not installed within
the time limitations set by the City Engineer, or not installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, then
the City may withdraw from the savings account, other security, or trust the amount necessary to complete
the improvement. The City Engineer shall determine the period of the assignment of the savings account,
other security, or the trust.
After completion of all required improvements.. the City Engineer and any government agency
involved shall submit a written notice to the Planning Community Development Department stating that the
developer has completed the required improvements in accordance with P AMC 16.08.070 and with required
installation standards.
C. FINAL APPROVAL. The final plat shall conform to the preliminary plat as approved by
the City Council. If desired by the developer, the final plat may constitute only that portion of the approved
preliminary plat which he proposes to record and develop at the time.
26-~
2/00
16.08.050
The final plat shall be submitted to the Planning Community Development Department within five
years after City Council approval of the preliminary plat. Said preliminary approval shall become void .
unless a final plat is submitted and approved by the City.
The developer shall submit a mylar tracing and six (6) prints (or more if required) of the final plat
and other required exhibits, including a filing fee, to the City Plal111ilIg Community Development
Department at least fourteen days prior to the meeting in which the Final plat is to be considered by the
Planning Commission. The amount of the fee shall be set by Resolution of the City Council and may be
amended or changed by Resolution from time to time, or as necessary.
The Planning Commission shall review the final plat to determine if the plat conforms with the
preliminary plat, the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Code and other land use regulations,
the Urban Services Ordinance, the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines, and these Subdivision
Regulations and shall make its recommendation to the City Council.
If the Planning Commission recommends approvesal of the final plat, the Chairperson shall sign the
final tracing.
Following the recommendation of approval of the final plat by the Planning Commission, the Eity
Planning Community Development Department shall obtain the signatures of the County Health Officer
(when required by the Commission), City Clerk, City Manager, Fire Chief, Director of Public Works and
Utilities, Planning Community Development Director, and City Attorney on the final tracing and shall
submit the tracing of the final plat to the City Council for approval and signature by the Mayor.
At least ten days prior to the public hearing of the City Council in which the final plat is to be
considered, the developer shall post a notice regarding said hearing in a conspicuous location on the site.
Within thirty (30) days the City Council shall act upon the final plat. The thirty (30) day limit may be
extended from the date of the final plat being filed with the PlromilIg Community Development Department
with the consent of the applicant.
The developer shall have lm the final plat recorded within thirty (30) days from the date lm the final
plat is approved by the City Council.
After obtaining signatures of City officials and prior to thirty (30) days after recording, the developer .
shall obtain and give to the City LIlgineeI Community Development Department a mylar or equivalent
duplicate of the final plat.
D. APPROV AL AND REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLATS. When a proposed
plat or subdivision is situated adjacent to the right-of-way of state highways, said plat or subdivision shall
be submitted to the Director of Highways. Approval by the Com:mi33ion ~ shall be withheld until said
Director or his assistant has made a report to the Commi33iOll City.
When a proposed plat, subdivision or dedication is adjacent to unincorporated territory notice of such
proposed plat shall be given to the Clallam County Planning Commission.
Any decision by the City Council approving or refusing to approve a plat or subdivision shall be
reviewable for arbitrary, capricious or corrupt action or non-action, by petition before the Superior Court
ofClallam County, by any aggrieved property owner of the county having jurisdiction thereof who deems
hilmdf agglicvcd thcIcby. Provided, that due application for petition shall be made to such court within
twenty-one days from the date of any decision so to be reviewed. (Ord. 3042 S2 (part) 1/28/00; Ord. 3007
S4, 1/15/99; Ord. 2990 S3, 5/15/98; Ord. 2880 S2 (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 2789 S12 1/1/94; Ord. 2743 S1,
1/29/93; Ord. 2719 S2, 11/13/92; Ord. 2143 S2, 5/31/81; Ord. 2034 SI, 7/16/79; Ord. 1631 S4, 11/14/67.)
.
6/1 7/02
26-~
.
.
.
16.08.060
16.08.060 - Standards and Policies.
A. GENERAL STANDARDS. If a proposed street and/or lot pattern for any zone in Port
Angeles has been made by the City Councilor the Planning Commission, the street layout of any new plat
submitted shall be in general conformance to said pattern or plan. Otherwise proposed streets in new
subdivisions shall conform to the Comprehensive Plan" and the Urban Services Ordinance as adopted. the
Urban Services Standards and Guidelines promulgated consistent with and pursuant to P AMC 18.08.040
and 18.08.130. and the standards and requirements of this Chapter.
No territory proposed to be subdivided shall be a part of, nor encroach upon, any area designated in
the Comprehensive Plan for future public facilities.
No plan for the platting, replatting, subdivision, or dedication of any area shall be approved by the
City unless each lot shall abut on a dedicated. improved. and maintained City street and such street shall
connect directlv to an existing improved street that meets current street improvement standards as set forth
in the Comprehensive Plan. the Urban Services Ordinance. and the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines
promulgated consistent with and pursuant to PAMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.130. stleets slIo~n therein arc
eonnccted dilectly to an existing implOved public light-of-~a, s11eet that meets Gtnlc,nt s11eet implOvell1ent
standards as set forth in the Comprehwsi ve Plan, the Ul ban So vices Ordinance, alId the Ul ban Ser v ices
StalldaIds aIld C uiddines plomulgatc,d consistent ~ith arId ptnsuar'tl to P AMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.1]0 and
tlIat is adequate to ser v c the existilIg and ne w lots.
If any existing rights-of-way abutting the property being subdivided do not meet minimum width
standards. additional right-of-way shall be required in accordance with the standards as set forth in the
Comprehensive Plan. the Urban Services Ordinance. and the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines
promulgated consistent with and pursuant to P AMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.130. Where the Comprehensive
Plan or the City's official street plan indicates the necessity of a new right-of-way of a required width or
portion thereof for street purposes, whether within a new plat or new subdivision, or along the boundaries
of a new plat, new subdivision or new lot, such required right-of-way or portion thereof shall be dedicated
to the City of Port Angeles by the filing of a plat.
The area of a cemetery in one unit shall be not more than eighty (80) acres, which mayor can be
surrounded by streets and highways. If the area of a cemetery is intersected or cut by dedicated or unplatted
streets the areas on opposite sides of said streets shall form and be considered separate units.
Sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk
to and from school shall be provided pursuant to RCW 58.17.060 and RCW 58.17.110. The Planning
Commission may require plats to provide areas for parks, playgrounds, open spaces, recreation facilities,
schools, school grounds, saK: walking conditions on sehoolloutes, transit stops, and drainage ways.
Each proposed subdivision and the ultimate use of the land therein shall be in the interests of public
health, safety and welfare, and subdividers shall be prepared to present evidence to this effect when
requested by the Commission City.
Restrictive covenants not contrary to existing regulations regarding the use of land, governing and
binding all future owners of lots or tracts, may be shown on any plat.
No final plat of land within the force and effect of existing Zoning Regulations shall be approved
unless it is conforming with such Zoning Regulations.
Whenever there is a discrepancy between minimum standards or dimensions noted herein and those
contained in Zoning Regulations, Building Codes, or other official R regulations, the highest standard shall
apply.
B. GENERAL PRINCIPLES. POLICIES. The Commission shall ensure that appropriate
provision is made for: (1) the harmonious development of neighborhoods by requiring coordination of
streets within subdivisions with existing or planned streets, or with other elements of the Comprehensive
Plan; (2) adequate open spaces for recreation, schools, light and air; (3) distribution of population and traffic
which will create conditions favorable to public health, safety and convenience.
The Commission shall inquire into the public use, interest or need proposed to be served by the
establishment of a subdivision. If the results of such an inquiry indicate that a subdivision will not serve the
public use, interest or need, the Commission may recommend denyial apploval of such subdivision. The
Commission shall ensure that a subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Urban Services
Ordinance. Land which the Commission has found to be unsuitable for subdivision due to flooding, bad
drainage, steep slopes, rock formations or other feature likely to be harmful to the safety, welfare and general
health of the future residents,-- and the Commission considers inappropriate for subdivision; - shall not be
21~- 0
2/00
16.08.060
subdivided unless adequate methods which are consistent with the City's Wetlands and Environmentally
Sensitive Areas Protection Ordinances are formulated by the developer and approved by the City Engineer
Community Development Director.
C. STREETS AND ROADS.
1. The arrangement, character, extent, width, grade and location of all rt'l'ads streets shall
conform with the Comprehensive Plan, including the Capital Facilities Plan, the Urban Services Ordinance,
and the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines, and shall be considered in their relation to existing and
planned rt'l'ads streets, to topographic conditions, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate
relation to the proposed uses of the land to be served by such roads.
2. Where such is not shown on the Comprehensive Plan, the arrangement of streets in
a subdivision shall either provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing major streets in
the surrounding area; or shall conform to a street plan for the neighborhood, approved by the Commission
City, to meet a particular situation where topographic or other conditions make continuance or conformance
to existing roads streets impracticable. This shall also apply to cluster subdivisions.
3. If a plclin1inary 01 suggestcd street plan for an area has been made by the Commission
City, the street layout of a proposed subdivision in such an area shall be in general conformance to the plan.
4. When a portion of a subdivider's tract is to be subdivided, a street plan for the entire
tract shall be submitted to indicate how the street pattern of the plat submitted will coordinate with the entire
tract when fully platted and with streets in the surrounding area.
5. Where a tract is subdivided into lots or tracts of an acrc 01 mOle larger in area than
twice the minimum lot size, the Comn.iission City may require an arrangement oflots and streets such as to
permit a later re-subdivision in conformity with the street and lot requirements specified in these
Regulations.
G. Vv11clcvcr plactical, dead-end strcets sllall be avoided. IIowcver, lOads designed with
a tmn-alOund at one cnd (cul-dc-sac) may be used whcn conditions ~allal.it tLcir use.
7. Vv11elcvcr Plactical, minol sheets shall be laid out to discomagc tluough tlaffic within
rcsidcntialncighbolhoods.
~S-. Where a proposed subdivision abuts or contains an existing or proposed major lOad,
arterial street or is adjacent to an existing or planned business, commercial or industrial district, the
COm1hission City may require treatment as may be necessary (1) for the adequate protection of residential
properties; and (2) to afford separation of through and local traffic.
19. Where a subdivision borders or contains a railroad or limited access highway right-of-
way, the Commission City may require a road approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-
way at a distance suitable for appropriate use of the intervening land. Such distances shall also be
determined with due regard for the requirements of approach grades and future grade separations.
.8.+6. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles. Acute
angle intersection shall be avoided.
2++. There shall be no reserve strips controlling access to roads, except where the control
of such strips is definitely placed in with the City under conditions approved by the Commission.
lQtz. Sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students
who only walk to and from school shall be provided pursuant to RCW 58.17.060 and RCW 58.17.110.
D. BLOCKS.
1. The lengths, widths and shapes of blocks shall be determined with due regard to
provision of adequate building sites suitable to the special needs of the type of land use contemplated, the
zoning requirements as to lot area and dimensions, limitations and opportunities of the topography and other
environmental constraints, <md needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of vehicular and
pedestrian traffic. and the desired urban design of the City.
.
.
.
6/1 7/02
211-1
.
.
.
16.08.060
2. Where the local access streets follow a grid system, T!he width of blocks shall be
sufficient for two tz1 tiers of lots, unless existing conditions are such, in the judgment of the Commis!>ion
City, to render such requirements undesirable or impractical.
1:. Where the local access streets follow a curvilinear system, the size ofb]ocks should
follow the large rectangular area bounded by arterial streets, unless future considerations are such, in the
judgment of the City. to render such allowances undesirable or impractical.
13-. For residential subdivisions, Wwhere frontage is on a nlajOI lOad an arterial, the long
dimension of the block should be oriented with the in the opposite direction oftraffic flow.
~4. Pedestrian crosswalk=ways and sidewalks shall be required where deemed essential
to provide circulation or access to schools, playgrounds and parks, shopping eentGlS areas, tlanspoltation
arterial streets and trails, and other community facilities.
E. LOTS.
1. The lot area, width, depth, shape and orientation, and the minimum building setback
lines shall be appropriate for the location of the subdivision, for the type of development and land use
contemplated, and for the type of street system planned for the area, and shall conform with the requirements
of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. Excessive depth in relation to width shall be avoided. No lot shall have a depth
greater than twice three times its width.
3. Comer lots for residential use shall have extra width to permit appropriate building
setback from and orientation to both streets.
4. To ensure public health, convenience and safety, the subdividing ofland shall provide,
by means of a public street, each lot with satisfactory direct access to an existing public street that is
improved to City street standards..
5. Double frontage and reverse frontage lots shall be avoided, except where essential
to provide separation of residential development from baffle allelic!> arterial streets or to overcome specific
disadvantages of topography and orientation. A planting screen easement across which there shall be no
right of access shall be provided along the line of lots abutting such a 11 affle artcl) principal arterial street
or disadvantageous use.
6. Side lot lines shall be substantially at right angles or radial to street lines and front
Jot Jines.
7. No lot or lots for residential purposes shall be divided or sold into additional lots or
building sites, without compliance with the!>e S tlbdi v isiol1 Regulations Tit]e 16.
F. PUBLIC SPACES.
1. Where a proposed park, playground, school, or other public use shown in the
Comprehensive Plan, including the Capital Facilities Plan, and Urban Services Ordinance is located in whole
or in part in a subdivision, the Commis!>ion City may require the dedication or reservation of such area
within the subdivision in those cases in which the Commission City deems such requirement to be
reasonable.
2. Where deemed essential by the COn1mi!>sion City, upon consideration of the particular
type of development proposed in the subdivision, and especially in large-scale lleighborhood tlnit
development!> not anticipated in the Complehensi ve Plan subdivisions of 30 Jots or more, the Con1l1li!>sion
City may require the dedication or reservation of such areas or sites of a character, extent and location
suitable to the needs created by such development large subdivisions for schools, parks and other
neighborhood purposes.
3. Due regard shall be shown for the preservation of outstanding natural and cultural
features such as scenic spots, water courses, and historic sites, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the
Wetlands Protection Ordinance, and the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protection Ordinance..
G. EASEMENTS.
1. Utility easements shall be provided, centered on front, rear, or side lot lines, where
possible.
2. Where a subdivision is traversed by a water course, drainage way, channel, or stream,
there shall be provided a stonn water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the
lines of such water course, and such further width or construction, or both, as will be adequate for the
purpose. Parallel roads or parkways may be required in connection therewith.
211-2
2/00
16.08.060
H. STREET LIGHTING. Street lighting installations shall be located in reference to the
dimensions offull grown trees and in accordance with the determinations and standards of the City En~in('cI .
Public Works & Utilities Department.
I. DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS. Variations from and exceptions to the following standards
may be made by the Comnli55ion City, where topographic or other existing conditions make adherence to
these Regulations impractical.
J. STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Street Improvements shall be provided in accordance with
the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines promulgated consistent with and pursuant to P AMC 18.08.040
and 18.08.130.
K. BLOCKS.
1. Maximum length of all blocks shall be approximately twelve hundred (1200) feet.
2. Minimum length of all blocks shall be approximately five hundred (500) feet.
3. Crosswalk=-ways ~ may be required near the middle of all blocks longer than
approximately eight hundred (800) feet.
4. Minimum width of all blocks with two tiers oflots (plus width of alley, if any), shall
be two three hundred {ZOO} (300) feet.
L. LOTS.
1. The minimum width, depth, area and setback dimensions of all lots in proposed
subdivisions shall conform with City Zoning Regulations. If any dimension in a plat approved by the City
is more restrictive than the said Regulations, then the most restrictive dimension shall apply.
M. BUILDING LINE SETBACK.
1. The building line setback from the property lines of all lots shall be indicated by a
dashed line on all plats.
2. Required setbacks are a minimum, not a uniform standard. Varied setbacks along a
street help avoid a monotonous barracks appearance.
N. STANDARD PIPE SIZE.
The size of water, sanitary and 5tOllll sewer. and storm drainage pipes shall be as set forth .
in the Comprehensive Plan~ and Urban Services Ordinance. the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines
promulgated consistent with and pursuant to P AMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.130.
O. PROCEDURE FOR REIMBURSEMENT
Procedures for reimbursement shall be the same as that set forth in Section 13.68.140 P AMC.
P. SIGNAGE One (1) free standing sign no larger than twenty-four (24) square feet in area
shall be permitted for identification of the subdivision. The sign shall be placed in a locatedion in
conformance with the development standards of a particular zone. (Ord. 3042 92 (part) 1/28/00; Ord. 2977
~2, 12/26/97; Ord. 2948 ~3 (part) 2/14/97; Ord. 2880 ~2 (part) 8/25/95; Ord. 2795 ~1, 2/11/94; Ord. 2743
92,1/29/93; Ord. #2732916,12/25/92; Ord. #1881 91,6/23/76; Ord. #1631 95,11/14/67)
.
6/1 7/02
211-j
.
.
.
16.08.070
16.08.070 - Requirements for Acceptance of Plats.
A. DA T A REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT.
The preliminary plat shall be at a scale of not less than two hundred (200) feet to one (1) inch.
Data required for the preliminary plat shall include the following information, unless otherwise specified
by the City LnginGGI:
1. Location, width and purpose of all easements, existing and proposed.
2. Name and right-of-way widths of all existing and proposed streets on or adjacent to
the proposed subdivision.
3. Approximate location and size of all utilities (water mains, sewers, etc.) on an
adjacent to the proposed subdivision.
4. Contours, based on City adopted vertical datum, shall have intervals of not more than
5 feet for slopes of 10% or more and not more than two feet for slopes of 10% or less.
5. Locations of and results of tests made to ascertain subsurface soil, rock, and ground
water conditions, when required by the City Engineer.
6. Approximate locations of water courses, marshes, rock outcrops, wooded areas,
natural retention areas, direction of drainage, culverts, houses, all non-residential land uses and all other
significant features on and adjacent to the proposed subdivision.
7. Zoning on and adjacent to the proposed subdivision.
8. All highways or other major improvements planned by public authorities for future
construction on or near the proposed subdivision.
9. A vicinity sketch showing relation of the proposed subdivision to the surrounding area
with regard to major improvements.
10. The legal description of the tract to be platted, title under which the proposed
subdivision is to be recorded, names and addresses of the owners, date, scale, north arrow.
11. The legal description of the proposed lots.
12. Ownership ofunsubdivided land adjacent to the proposed subdivision and names of
adjoining existing plats.
13. The required building setbacks and any existing buildings and/or major structures
shall be shown for each proposed lot as well as their distances from property lines.
14. Identification of each lot and each block.
15. Approximate square footage and scaled dimensions of each lot.
16. Summary of site data, including total acreage, acreage in residential use, acreage in
streets, and number of acres in parks and other non-residential land uses.
17. Environmental Checklist with filing fee.
18. Shoreline and Wetland permit applications and Environmentally Sensitive Areas
Protection Ordinance compliance (when required).
19. Affidavits of posting and publication.
211-4
2/00
16.08.070
B. SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS REOUIRED. All load~ay street and utility
improvements must be designed to comply with the current APW A standards and as specified by the City
Engineer and with the Comprehensive Plan, the Urban Services Ordinance, and the Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines promulgated consistent with and pursuant to P AMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.130.
Plans and specifications for load~ay street and utility improvements must be approved by the City Engineer
prior to the beginning of construction. Minimum improvements shall be as follows:
C. STREETS AND ROADWAYS.
1. The entire right-of-way shall be cleared and grubbed of all objectionable materials.
Trees approved by the City for preservation shall be identified.
2. Streets shall be graded and improved with paving, curbs and gutters, drainage and
sidewalks according to the approved plans and roadway section.
3. Street lights shall be installed as specified by the City Engineer.
4. Street name signs shall be provided and installed by the City at cost to the developer.
5. Permanent monuments shall be installed" and each lot shall be staked.
D. UTILITIES. A water distribution system, storm drainage system, electrical distribution
system and a sanitary sewage disposal system shall be designed and installed in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan" and the Urban Services Ordinance" dCvelopment stalldards and the Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines promulgated consistent with and pursuant to P AMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.130.
E. P ARKS. Parks and recreation shall be provided consistent with the Comprehensive Plan"
and the Urban Services Ordinance. and the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines promulgated
consistent with and pursuant to PAMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.130.
F. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS.
1. Street Trees. Street trees are a protection against excessive heat and glare and enhance
the attractiveness and value of abutting property. The City will assist the subdivider in location of trees and
species to use under varying conditions. It is recommended that trees be planted inside the property lines
where they are less subject to injury, decrease the chance of motor accidents and enjoy more favorable
conditions for growth. If trees are to be planted within a planting strip in the right-of-way, their proposed
locations and species to be used are to be submitted for review and approval by the City.
G. REQUIRED DATA FOR APPROV AL OF FINAL PLAT. The final plat shall be an eighteen
(18) inch by twenty-four (24) inch permanent reproducible, and shall be at a scale of not less than two
hundred (200) feet to one (1) inch. A reduced copy no larger than II" x 17" shall be submitted with the final
prints. For large subdivisions, the plat may be on several sheets, accompanied by an index sheet showing
the entire subdivision. The final plat shall be accompanied by a report containing accurate square footage
and dimensions of each lot and block and the coordinates of each monument; a title report; and shall include
a warranty that all assessments in favor of the City have been paid.
The final plat and survey shall be based on the Washington Coordinate System, North Zone, as
adopted by the City. The final plat shall show the following:
1. A minimum of two permanent plat control monuments with coordinates, to which
all dimensions, bearings, azimuths and similar data on the plat shall be referred.
2. Permanent monuments at all corners.
3. Subdivision boundary lines, right-of-way lines, easements, lot lines with accurate
dimensions, bearings or azimuths, radii, central angles, and lengths of all curves.
4. Name and right-of-way width of each street. Any street not dedicated to the public
must be so marked on the face of the plat (RCW 58.17.165).
5. Location, dimensions and purpose of all easements.
6. Identification of each lot and block with addresses shown on the lots.
.
.
.
6/1 7/02
21SO
.
.
.
16.08.070
16.08.090
7. The required building setbacks and any existing buildings and/or major structures
shall be shown for each proposed lot as well as their distances from property lines.
8. Purpose for which sites, other than residential, are dedicated to the public or reserved
for future development.
9. The required building setbacks on each proposed lot.
10. Location and description of all monuments.
11. The title under which the subdivision is to be recorded, true north and grid north
arrows, scale, and legend.
12. Legal description of the land to be platted;
13 The legal description of the proposed lots
14. Certification by registered land surveyor as to the accuracy of plat and survey.
15. Certificate by owner(s) containing the legal description of the land to be platted and
dedicating roads, rights-of-way, easements and any sites for public purposes.
16. Certification of approval by: (a) the Planning Commission; (b) Director of Public
Works and Utilities; (c) Health Department (when required); (d) City Council; (e) City Manager, City Clerk,
Fire Chief, Plall11ing Community Development Director, and City Attorney.
17. Certification by the County Treasurer that all state and county taxes levied against the
land to be subdivided have been paid in full.
18. Certification of filing by County Auditor.
19. If improvements are to be bonded deferred rather than actually installed prior to final
plat approval, the plat shall show a notation as follows: "No occupancy of any dwelling units will be
allowed until all roadway and utility improvements have been completed and approved by the City
Engineer." (Ord. 3042 S2 (part) 1/28/00; Ord. 2948 S3 (part) 2/14/97; Ord. 2909 S3, 3/29/96; Ord. 2880 S2,
8/25/95; Ord. 2743 S3, 1/29/93; Ord. 2045 Sl, 10/27/79; Ord. 1966 S2, 4/29/78; Ord. 1631 S6, 11/14/67.)
16.08.080 - Variances and Modifications. Where the ConIn1ission 01 the Council City finds that
extraordinary hardship may result from strict compliance with these Regulations, it may vary the Regulations
so that substantial justice may be done and the public interest secured; provided that such variance will not
have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan or these Regulations.
The standards and requirements of these Regulations may be modified by the COlllmission 01 the
Cotlndl City through a Planned Residential Development which in the judgment of the Comnlission 01 the
Cotnl(,il City will provide adequate public spaces and improvements for the circulation, recreation, light, air
and service needs of the tract when fully developed and populated, and which also will provide such
covenants or other legal provisions as will assure conformity with and achievement of the plan.
In granting variances and modifications, the Commission 01 the Coul1(,il City may require such
conditions as, in its judgment, will secure substantially the objectives of the standards or requirements so
varied or modified. (Ord. 2880 S2, 8/25/95; Ord. 1631 S7, 11/14/67.)
16.08.090 - Validity. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of these
Regulations be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity
ofthe remaining portions of these Regulations. (Ord. 2880 S2, 8/25/95; Ord. 1631 S8, 11/14/67.)
2~-6
2/00
16.08.100
16.08.110
] 6.08.] 00 - Enforcement and Penalties. Within any twelve-month period of time, any person, firm
or corporation that has platted, subdivided or divided any parcel of land or property in two (2) or more lots .
or tracts, each of which is five (5) acres or less in area, for the purpose of providing building sites, and has
failed to comply with the provisions of these Regulations, shall be subject to a fine not to exceed one
hundred ($100.00) dollars for each lot or tract, or imprisonment in jail for a period not to exceed thirty (30)
days, or both.
Any person, firm or corporation who agrees to transfer, sell or option to sell any lot or tract by
reference to a plat or map of a subdivision or division, before such plat has been filed for record in the office
of the County Auditor, shall pay a penalty of one hundred ($100.00) dollars for each lot or tract transferred,
sold, or optioned to be sold. Description of such lots or tracts by metes and bounds in the instrument of
transfer shall not exempt the transaction from such penalty.
The COll1111i55ioll Community Development Department shall refer violations to the City Attorney
for appropriate action to enforce these penalties. (Ord. 2880 S2, 8/25/95; Ord. 1631 S9, 11/14/67.)
] 6.08.110 - Plat Occupancy. lfthe developer of a plat elects to bond assign savings or provide other
security or trust approved 'by the City and thereby assure that the installation of the required improvements
for final plat approval will be done to the satisfaction and approval of the City Engineer, building permits
for the construction of houses within the plat will be issued subject to the following conditions:
1. The final plat must have received all required approvals and be recorded with the County
Auditor.
2. No occupancy of any dwelling units will be allowed until all IOadvvay street and utility
improvements have been completed and approved by the City Engineer. (Ord. 2880 S2, 8/25/95; Ord. 1966
S 1,4/29/78.)
.
.
6/17/02
2]1-7
.
.
.
16.10.010
16.10.020
Chapter 16.10
Binding Site Improvement Plan
Sections:
16.10.010
16.10.015
16.10.020
16.1 0.030
16.10.040
16.10.050
16.10.060
16.10.070
16.10.080
16.10.090
16.1 0.1 00
16.10.110
Purpose
Definitions
Application
Review Procedures
Standards and Criteria
Preliminary Approval
Final Approval
Installation of Improvements
Time Limitations
Revision
Appeals
Enforcement
16.10.010 Purpose. This Chapter is established to provide an alternative to the traditional method
of land division in commercial and industrial zones as provided in RCW 58.17.035. A Binding Site
Improvement Plan (BSIP) allows for the division of land for the purpose of sale or lease when used for
commercial or industrial purposes as an integrated commercial or industrial center and allows certain
development standards (zoning, parking, setbacks, landscaping, lot area and lot dimension) on individual
lots to be modified provided the standards for the entire center are met. This Chapter is also intended to
encourage simultaneous construction of required infrastructure and private structures. (Ord. 3003 S 1 (part),
12/25/98)
16.10.015 Definitions.
A. Binding site improvement plan or BSIP. "Binding site improvement plan" or "BSIP" means
an integrated site plan submitted to the City pursuant to this Chapter for approval of all planned buildings,
public and private infrastructure, and other improvements and amenities to be developed as a commercial
or industrial center.
B. Commercial or industrial center. "Commercial center" or "industrial center" means a
development complex of mixed commercial and/or industrial businesses that share facilities and are
organized by some form of common management. A business and office park, an industrial park, a
corporate campus, and a shopping center are typical examples of commercial or industrial centers.
C. Integrated site. "Integrated site" means one or more parcels of land operated as a single
development site for the purposes of shared facilities and common management. (Ord. 3003 S 1 (part),
12/25/98)
16.10.020 Application. The following items are required, in quantities specified by the Planning
Community Development Department, for a complete Binding Site Improvement Plan (BSIP) application,
unless waived by the Planning Director as not being applicable:
A. Complete BSIP application form with fee as set forth in Chapter 3.70 of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code.
B. Complete State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) checklist and fee.
C. Complete applications for other required land use approvals if applicable.
D. A vicinity map showing location of site.
E. A drawing prepared to the following standards:
1. The drawing shall be in ink, to a scale of not less than one inch to one hundred feet,
on 8 'h inch by 11 inch or larger paper.
2~-8
2/00
16.1 0.020
16.1 0.030
2. The drawing shall provide the following information:
a. The date, scale, and north directional arrow;
b. The boundaries of the entire parcel being platted, including all contiguous
unplatted property owned by the subdivider;
c. A legal description ofthe property being platted;
d. Identification, dimensions, and area of all proposed lots and address
numbering. Interior lots to be eliminated shall be shown by a dashed line and so noted;
e. The name and location of existing and proposed public rights-of-way;
f. The location of existing and proposed easements;
g. The required building setbacks on each proposed lot;
h. The location of existing and new buildings including distances from property
and/or leasehold lines, driveways and parking calculations;
i. The location of existing natural features, such as streams, rivers, wetlands,
shorelines, drainage ways, ravines and steep slopes;
j. The location and size of utilities, including water, sewer, storm drains, and
fire hydrants existing and proposed;
k. Location of sensitive areas and sensitive area buffers (as well as slopes of20%
or greater and drainage or other watercourses) on the site.
F. A list of owners of adjacent property printed or typed on 1" x 2 5/8" mailing labels and the
names of any adjacent subdivisions.
G. Legal descriptions of all tracts contained within the boundaries of the plat.
H. A description of the method of common management of shared facilities. (Ord. 3003 ~ 1
(part), 12/25/98)
.
16.10.030 Review Procedures.
A. Prior to submittal of a BSIP application for consideration, the applicant is encouraged to meet
with representatives of the Planning Community Development Department, Public Works &Utilities
Department, Fire Department, and Parks Department. The City representatives and the applicant may
discuss the general goals and objectives of the proposal, overall design possibilities, general character of the
site, potential environmental constraints, and standards of development. The focus of the meeting shall be
general in nature and none of the discussions shall be interpreted as a commitment by the City or the
applicant.
B. Review of proposals under five (5) acres in size shall be done administratively by the
rIMming Community Development Department. Review of proposals exceeding five (5) acres in size shall
be done by the Planning Commission following a public hearing.
C. Public notice shall be provided as follows:
1. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of the public hearing, the applicant shall
cause notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing to be posted on the site in a conspicuous manner
in the form of a brightly colored notice on a self-standing sign as provided by the Planning Community
Development Department or in such other form as the PlMming Community Development Department may
direct. The applicant shall file with the Planning Community Development Department an affidavit that
such posting has been accomplished and that the applicant shall assume full responsibility for return or
replacement, in the case of damage. Consideration will be given in the case of vandalism beyond the
applicant's control.
2. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of the public hearing, the Planning
Community Development Department shall cause notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing to be
mailed to the latest recorded real property owners within at least 300 feet of the boundary of the site as
shown by the records of the County Assessor. The applicant shall provide the Planning Community
Development Department with mailing labels for each such property owner.
D. An environmental determination shall be rendered by the SEP A Responsible Official prior
to final action on the preliminary BSIP application. (Ord. 3003 ~ 1 (part), 12/25/98)h
.
.
6/1 7/02
2]1-~
.
.
.
16.10.040
16.10.040 Standards and Criteria. Prior to approval of a BSIP, the following standards and criteria
shall be met:
A. Water supply and fire protection facilities must be adequate to serve the BSIP and comply
with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Urban Services Ordinance development standards.
B. Necessary drainage ways or storm drain facilities must be adequate to serve the BSIP as set
forth in the Comprehensive Plan.. and the Urban Services Ordinance.. dc.v dopInGnt 5talldald5 and the Urban
Services Standards and Guidelines promulgated consistent with and pursuant to P AMC 18.08.040 and
18.08.130.
C. Appropriate access to all anticipated uses within the site shall be available.
D. Monumentation of all exterior tract corners shall be completed.
E. The provision and dedication of streets and rights-of-way must be adequate to serve the BSIP
and comply with P AMC 16.04.070 and with the Comprehensive Plan.. and the Urban Services Ordinance..
dc.vdopmGut 5taIlda1d5 and the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines promulgated consistent with and
pursuant to P AMC 18.08.040 and 18.08.130..
F. The BSIP lot arrangement, configuration, and size must comply with the policies of the
Comprehensive Plan and further the attairunent of the goals, policies, and objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan. The proposed lots must comply with the requirements of the Zoning Code, Title 17 P AMC, as now
enacted or hereafter amended, and P AMC 16.04.070.
G. The BSIP must be compatible with existing and planned development of the surrounding
area.
H. The site must be zoned commercial or industrial and must be integrated, as defined in P AMC
16.10.015.
1. Appropriate easements and maintenance agreements for shared facilities, including but not
limited to, circulation, parking, utilities and landscaping must be provided.
J. When taken as a whole and not considering any interior lot or leasehold lines, the integrated
site must meet all zoning and subdivision requirements.
K. Modifications to the minimum zoning standards for individual lots located within the
integrated site, including setbacks, parking, landscaping, lot area, lot coverage, and lot dimension shall not
be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, and shall not adversely affect the rest of the integrated
site or other properties in the vicinity.
L. Common improvements necessary to serve any particular phase of development must be
sufficient for meeting the zoning and subdivision requirements for that phase.
M. Access to the integrated site must meet the subdivision ordinance standards. Access within
the site must provide for safe and efficient circulation and must meet Fire Department access requirements.
N. The circulation system must incorporate appropriate provisions and provide sufficient area
for safe pedestrian activity to the site from the street and from building to building within the site.
O. Sign regulations shall be applied to the integrated site as a whole. For example, the number
of freestanding signs allowed shall be based upon the BSIP as a site. Individual ownerships within the
integrated site shall not be considered separate sites in determining the number of freestanding signs
allowed.
P. Landscaping design standards shall be maintained as required in the underlying zoning
development standards.
Q. Land clearing/grading shall be performed in compliance with the City's
Clearing/Grading/Filling Ordinances. Land that contains envirorunentally sensitive and critical areas shall
only be developed under the City's regulations for development in those areas.
R. Each proposed BSIP and the ultimate use of the land therein shall be in the interests of the
public health, safety, and welfare, and applicants shall present evidence to this effect when requested.
S. Whenever there is a discrepancy between minimum standards or dimensions noted herein
and those contained in Zoning Regulations, Building Codes, or other official Regulations, the more
restrictive standard shall apply.
T. A description of the facilities shared by the development complex of mixed commercial
and/or industrial businesses shall be provided and the system of common management of those facilities
shall be described on the face of the final mylar. (Ord. 3003 ~ 1 (part), 12/25/98)
2 ;2-0
2/00
16.10.060
16.10.110
16.10.050 Preliminary Approval.
A. The Pl<uming Community Development Director or Planning Commission shall approve, .
approve with conditions, or deny the BSIP within the time requirements of Chapter 18.02 P AMC. Said
preliminary decision shall be in writing and shall set forth findings of fact supporting the decision.
B. Preliminary approval or approval with conditions shall authorize the applicant to proceed
with preparation of the final BSIP. (Ord. 3003 91 (part), 12/25/98)
16.10.060 Final Approval.
A. Prior to final approval, a survey shall be performed by a licensed surveyor who shall submit
a mylar to the Plroming Community Development Department for recordation. The mylar shall be prepared
to acceptable survey standards and shall contain the information required in the preliminary drawing. The
Mylar shall also contain the required official recording block and signatures of the City Plroliling Community
Development Director, €ity Public Works & Utilities Director, €ity Fire Chief, and the property owner. For
those applications that require review by the Planning Commission, provision will be made for the signature
of the Chair of the Plannmg CommissIOn. The survey and plan shall be consistent with the conditions of
preliminary approval.
B. Once the Plromin.g Community Development Department determines the survey, plan, and
any other documents for recording are consistent with the prelimmary approval, it will be reviewed by the
appropriate City departments and signed by the appropriate City officials.
C. After being certified for filing by the City, the BSIP survey shall be filed by the applicant with
the Clallam County Auditor's Office. The applicant shall pay all costs associated with the filing. The BSIP
is not considered final until a copy of the recorded document is returned to the City of Port Angeles Pla1U'l.ing
Community Development Department for record keeping purposes.
D. Upon final approval by the city, all developments shall conform to the BSIP unless an
amendment is approved by the City. (Ord. 3003 91 (part), 12/25/98)
16.05.070 Installation ofImprovements. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction
within a binding site improvement plan, all improvements required to adequately service that portion of the
BSIP for which the building permit will be issued shall be installed. Approval for improvements and .
finalization of specific individual commercial or industrial lots shall be done administratively. (Ord. 3003
91 (part), 12/25/98)
16.05.080 Time Limitations. Ifno specific BSIP has been approved within five (5) years of the date
of preliminary approval, preliminary approval will expire. The applicant may obtain an extension of the
BSIP not to exceed two (2) years by filmg a written request with the Planning Community Development
Department prior to the expiration of the five (5) year period. (Ord. 3003 S 1 (part), 12/25/98)
16.10.090 Revisions. Alteration of an approved and recorded BSIP shall be accomplished by
application to the Plro'l.1'l.ing Community Develonment Department and shall be subject to all procedures and
requirements established in this Chapter. (Oro. 3003 91 (part), 12/25/98)
16.10.100 Appeals.
A. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Plalll'l.illg Community Development Director
or the Planning Commission may appeal the decision to the City Council.
B. Appeals shall be submitted to the Plarulil1g Community Development Department in writing
within fourteen (14) days following the date of mailing of the decision to the applicant and shall be
accompanied by the required fee as set forth in Chapter 3.70 PAMC.
C. The City Council shall hear the appeal, and may uphold, reverse, or modify the decision and
shall set forth written findings of fact. (Ord. 3003 S 1 (part), 12/25/98)
16.10.110 Enforcement. All provisions, conditions, and requirements of the BSIP shall be legally
enforceable against the purchaser or any other person acquiring a lease or other ownership interest of any
lot parcel, or tract created pursuant to the BSIP. Any sale, transfer, or lease of any lot or parcel created
pursuant to the BSIP that does not conform to the requirements of the BSIP or without binding site plan
ap.proval shall be considered a violation of Chapter 58.17 RCW, shall be subject to being restrained by
injunctive action and be illegal as provided in Chapter 58.17 RCW, and shall be subject to the general .
penalty set forth in PAMC 1.24.010. (Ord. 3003 91 (part), 12/25/98)
6/17/02
2~-f
.
.
.
16.12.010
16.12.050
CHAPTER 16.12
BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENTS
Sections:
16.12.010 Purpose and Intent.
16.12.020 Authority.
16.12.030 Definition.
16.12.040 Scope.
16.12.050 Application.
16.12.060 Planning Community Development Department Decision.
16.12.070 Recording.
16.12.080 Appeals.
16.12.01 0 - Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this Chapter is to establish procedures for the
approval of boundary line adjustments in order to ensure that such divisions of land are accomplished in an
orderly manner, with proper records, and in compliance with applicable laws. (Ord. 2669 ~ 1 (part),
1/17/92.)
16.12.020 - Authority. This Chapter is adopted pursuant to the authority of Chapter 58-17 RCW,
RCW 35A.63.100(3), and the police power granted the City of Port Angeles by the Constitution and laws
of the State of Washington. (Ord. 2669 ~1 (part), 1/17/92.)
16.12.030 - Definition. A boundary line adjustment is defined as a division ofland made for the
purpose of alteration by adjusting boundary lines, between planned or unplatted lots or both, which does not
create any additional lot, tract, parcel, site, or division, nor create any lot, tract, parcel, site, or division which
contains insufficient area and dimension to meet minimum requirements for width and area for a building
site. (Ord. 2669 ~1 (part), 1/17/92.)
16.12.040 - Scope. The submittal of boundary line adjustment applications for City approval under
this Chapter shall be at the option of the affected property owners. If property owners request City approval
of boundary line adjustments, said approval shall be consistent with this Chapter. (Ord. 2669 ~ 1 (part),
1/17/92.)
16.12.050 - Application. Application for a boundary line adjustment shall be made to the Planning
Community Development Department. The application form shall be made available at the Plamling
Community Development Department. The application shall include the signatures of all property owners
affected by the adjustment. In addition, an 18" x 22" drawing, drawn to scale, shall be provided with the
following information:
A. Existing and adjusted property lines shown as solid lines;
B. Distance between existing and adjusted line(s);
C. Dimensions of all property lines before and after adjustment;
D. Location of all existing buildings, with nearest distance between each building and all
existing and proposed property lines;
2~-2
2/00
16.12.050
16.12.080
E.
F.
G.
Legal description of property (existing and proposed);
Location of existing and proposed easements that are in favor of a public entity;
The location of public and private streets. (Ord. 2669 ~ 1 (part), 1/17/92.)
.
16.12.060 - Pla1111ing Community Deve]opment Department Decision. The Plall11ing Community
Development Department's decision shall be based on whether or not the proposed boundary line adjustment
meets the following standards:
A. The boundary line adjustment does not create any additional new lots;
B. The boundary line adjustment does not create any lot which does not meet the minimum lot
width and area standards for the zone district in which it is located;
C. The boundary line adjustment does not increase the degree of nonconformance of structures
with respect to zoning standards;
D. The boundary line adjustment makes provision for all necessary utility easements;
E. The adjusted lots meet the requirements of the Short Plat Ordinance, Chapter 16.04 PAMC,
with respect to configuration and access to public streets; or if the existing lots do not meet these
requirements, the adjusted lots shall not increase the degree of nonconformity.
The Plalming Community Deve]opment Department shall take action on the request within twenty (20)
working days from when the application is deemed complete. The applicant shall be notified in writing of
the action. (Ord. 2669 ~1 (part), 1/17/92.)
16.12.070 - Recording.
A. A survey shall be prepared and recorded with the County Auditor's Office on an 18" x 22"
reproducible mylar. The mylar shall show property lines and dimensions, showing the new comers as staked
on the ground, building locations, location of easements, and public and private streets. The mylar shall also
contain signatures of all property owners and signature blocks for the Plamling Community Deve]opment
Director and Public Works & Utilities Director. A copy of the recorded survey shall be provided to the
Planning Department. .
B. In order to ensure that the adjustment does not create an additional lot, the following wording
shall be included on each deed filed as part of the adjustment:
"This conveyance is for the purpose of accomplishing a boundary line adjustment pursuant
to RW 58.17.040(6). It shall not create any additional lots, traccts, parcels, or division.
Rather, the land described herein shall merge or be integrated into abutting property presently
owned by the grantee(s)."
(Ord. 2948 S4 2/14/97; Ord. 2669 Sl (part), 1/17/92.)
16.12.080 - Appeals.
A. Any person aggrieved by the Decision of the Planning Community Deve]opment Director
under Section 16.12.050 may appeal the decision to the Planning Commission.
B. Appeals shall be submitted to the Plarming Community Deve]opment Department in writing
within thirty (30) days following the date of mailing the decision to the application.
C. The Planning Commission shall hear the appeal at its next possible public meeting and
hereupon make a recommendation to the City Council to uphold, reverse, or modify the decision, based upon
the compliance of the boundary line adjustment with the requirements of this Chapter. Such
recommendation shall include written findings of fact.
D. The City Council, at its next possible public meeting following receipt of the Planning
Commission's recommendations, may adopt, reverse, or modify the Planning Commission's
recommendations and shall set forth written findings of fact. (Ord. 2669 ~ 1 (part), 1/17/92.)
{Revisor's Note: Due to a drafting oversight, Ordinance No. 2669 erroneously referred to "preliminary short
p]at" instead of "boundary line adjustment" in Section 16.12.080(C).]
.
6/17/02
2~j
.
ATTACHMENT E
CHAPTER 17.01
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
Sections:
17.01.010 Purpose.
.
17.01.010 Purpose. This comprehensive Ordinance is adopted for the following
purposes:
A. To implement the requirements of the State Growth Management Act of 1990
through the goals, policies, and objectives of the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan by
dividing the City into zones restricting and regulating therein the location, construction,
reconstruction, alteration, and use of buildings, structures and land for residential, business,
commercial, manufacturing, public, and other specified uses.(Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95;
Ord. 266891 (part), 1/17/92; Ord.1709 91 (part), 12/22/70.)
B. To protect the character and maintain the stability of residential, commercial,
manufacturing, and public areas within the City, and to promote the orderly and appropriate
development of such areas. (Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 91 (part), 1/17/92; Ord.
170991 (part), 12/22/70)
C. To regulate the intensity of use of lots and parcels of land, and to determine
the spaces surrounding buildings necessary to provide adequate light, air, privacy, and
access to property. (Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 266891 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709
9 1 (part), 12/22/70)
D. To sustain natural landscapes, corridors, and habitats for fish and wildlife and
to provide relief from the urban landscape within the community through the designation of
open space areas. (Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95)
E. To limit congestion in the public streets and to protect the public health,
safety, convenience, and general welfare by providing for off-street parking of motor
vehicles, the loading and unloading of commercial vehicles, public transit access, and
pedestrian safety. (Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 266891 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 SI
(part), 12/22/70)
F. To establish building lines and the location of buildings designed for
residential, commercial, manufacturing, public, or other uses within such lines. (Ord.2861
91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 266891 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 170991 (part), 12/22/70)
G. To prevent the overcrowding ofland and undue concentration of structures
and to preserve existing unusual, unique, and interesting features of the natural landscape so
far as is possible and appropriate in each zone by regulating the use and the bulk of buildings
in relation to the land surrounding them. (Ord. 2861 91 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 91 (part),
1/17/92; Ord. 170991 (part), 12/22/70)
H. To provide protection from fire, explosion, noxious fumes, and other hazards
and to maintain the quality oflife in the interest of public health, safety, comfort, and general
.
June 17, 2002
Page 1
224
17.01.010
welfare by establishing minimum level of service standards throughout the City. (Ord. 2861
SI (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 gl (part), 1/17/92; Ord.1709 gl (part), 12/22170)
I. To prevent such additions to, and alteration or remodeling of, existing
buildings or structures as would not comply with the restrictions and limitations imposed
hereunder. (Ord. 2861 gl (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 gl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 gl (part),
12/22170)
J. To prohibit uses, buildings, or structures which are incompatible with the
character of the permitted uses within specified zones. (Ord. 2861 gl (part), 3/17/95; Ord.
2668 S 1 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 g 1 (part), 12/22170)
K. To conserve the taxable value ofland and buildings throughout the City.
(Ord. 2861 SI (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 gl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 gl (part), 12/22170)
L. To encourage the preservation of historic or culturally significant sites and
structures throughout the City. (Ord. 2861 S 1 (part), 3/17/95)
M. To define and to limit the powers and duties of the administrative officers and
bodies as provided herein and to protect the private property rights of landowners from
arbitrary, capricious, and discriminatory actions. (Ord. 2861 S 1 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668
gl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 gl (part), 12/22170)
N. To improve the variety, quality, availability, and affordability of the housing
opportunities in the City. (Ord. 2861 SI (part), 3/17/95)
O. To avoid or mitigate significant adverse impacts such as hazardous materials.
air and water pollution. noise. traffic. outside storage. large structures. and public safety
problems which can be associated with specific land uses and thereby reduce conflicts
between adiacent land uses.
P. To identify what development should take place in each zone to accomplish
the desired urban design as defined by the City's land use planning policies and regulations.
.Q.6. Zoning Intentions:
1. RS-7 Zone - This is a low density residential zone intended to create
and preserve urban single family residential neighborhoods consisting of predominantly
single family homes on standard Townsite-size lots. Uses which are compatible with and
functionally related to a single family residential environment may also be located in this
zone. Because of land use impacts associated with nonresidential uses. few nonresidential
uses are allowed in this zone and then only conditionally. This zone provides the basic
urban land use pattern for the City's single family residential neighborhoods following a
standard rectangular street grid system of 60-foot rights-of-way for local access streets and
300-foot by 500-foot blocks with 50-foot by 140-foot lots and usually located in areas that
are largely developed and closer to the center of the City. (Ord. 2861 gl (part), 3/17/95;
Ord. 2668 gl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 2385 gl (part), 5/18/86; Ord. 1709 gl (part), 12/22170)
2. RS-9 Zone - This is a low density residential zone intended to create
and preserve urban single family residential neighborhoods consisting of predominantly
single family homes on larger than standard Townsite-size lots. Uses that are compatible
with and functionally related to a single family residential environment may be located in
June 17,2002
Page 2
225
.
.
.
.
17.01.010
.
this zone. Because of land use impacts associated with nonresidential uses. few nonresi-
dential uses are allowed in this zone and then only conditionally. This zone provides for a
variety in the urban land use pattern for the City's single family residential neighborhoods
following a curvilinear street system of non through public and private streets wth irregular
shaped lots. minimum 75-foot front lot lines. and 60-foot rights-of-way for collector arterial
streets in large rectangular blocks and usually located in outlying areas with large tracts of
vacant buildable land. (Ord. 2861 Sl (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2668 Sl (part), 1/17/92; Ord.
2385 Sl (part), 5/18/86; Ord. 1709 Sl (part), 12/22170)
3. RTP Zone - This is a medium density residential zone intended for
mobile home occupancies, and the area is regarded as essentially residential in character.
Few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and then only conditionally. because of land
use impacts associated with nonresidential uses. This zone provides the basic urban land use
pattern for the City's small lot. single family. mobile home parks following an irregular
urban land use pattern of private access roads and minimum 3500 square foot lots. (Ord.
2861 SI (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 Sl, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 Sl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 Sl
(part), 12/22170))
4. RMD Zone - This is a medium density residential zone, which allows
a mix of single family, duplexes and apartments at a density greater than single family
neighborhoods but less than the RHD Zone. The permitted uses in the RMD Zone are also
intended to be more restrictive than the RHD Zone. Commercial uses are not considered to
be compatible. Few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and then only conditionally.
because ofland use impacts associated with nonresidential uses. This zone provides for a
variety in the urban land use pattern for the City's lower density multi-family residential
neighborhoods (at twice the density of the City's basic single family residential
neighborhoods) with direct access on an arterial street. usually located in outlying areas with
large tracts of vacant buildable land. and serving as a transitional use between low density
residential uses and commercial/industrial uses. (Ord. 2861 Sl (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715
Sl,10/16/92)
5. RHD Zone - This is a high density residential zone for multi-family
structures. Compatible uses may be allowed on Conditional Use Permits, but the zone is
still regarded as a residential area, where commercial enterprises are not generally felt to be
compatible. Few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and then only conditionally.
because of land use impacts associated with nonresidential uses. This zone provides the
basic urban land use pattern for the City's higher density multi-family residential
neighborhoods (at seven times the density of the City's basic single family residential
neighborhoods) following a standard rectangular street grid system of 60-foot rights-of-way
for local access streets and 300-foot by 500-foot blocks and usually located in areas that are
largely developed and closer to the center of the City. (Ord.2861 Sl (part), 3/17/95; Ord.
2715 Sl, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 SI (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 SI (part), 12/22170)
6. PRD Overlay Zone - This overlay zone is to provide alternative
zoning regulations which permit and encourage design flexibility, conservation and
.
June 17, 2002
Page 3
226
17.01.010
protection of natural critical areas, and innovation in residential developments to those
regulations found in the underlying zone. It is intended that a Planned Residential
Development will result in a residential environment of higher quality than traditional lot-
by-lot development by use of a design process which includes within the site design all the
components of a residential neighborhood, such as open space, circulation, building types,
and natural features, in a manner consonant with the public health, safety, and welfare. It is
also intended that a Planned Residential Development may combine a number of land use
decisions such as conditional use permits, rezones, and subdivisions into a single project
review process to encourage timely public hearings and decisions and to provide for more
open space and transitional housing densities than is required or may be permitted between
single family and multi-family zones. The consolidation of permit reviews does not exempt
applicant(s) from meeting the regulations and submitting the fees and applications normally
required for the underlying permit processes. Few nonresidential uses are allowed in this
overlay zone and then only conditionally. because of land use impacts associated with
nonresidential uses. This overlay zone provides for the opportunity to create self-contained
residential neighborhoods with a variety of housing choices without following a standard
system of public streets and lot design and with allowances for mixed use. residential and
commerical developments not usually permitted in residential zones. (Ord. 2861 ~ 1 (part),
3/17/95; Ord. 2715 ~1, 10/16/92; Ord. 2657 ~1 (part), 12/13/91; Ord. 2038 ~1 (part),
7/29/79)
7. CO Zone - This is a commercial zone intended for those business,
office, administrative, or professional uses which do not involve the retail sale of goods, but
rather provide a service to clients, the provision of which does not create high traffic
volumes, involve extended hours of operation, or contain impacts that would be detrimental
to adjacent residential areas. Commercial uses that are largely devoid of any impacts
detrimental to single family residential uses are allowed. This zone provides the basic urban
land use pattern for small lot. transitional uses between residential neighborhoods and
commercial districts with direct access on an arterial street and design standards compatible
with residential development. (Ord. 2861 ~1 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 ~1, 10/16/92; Ord.
2668 ~1 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 2109 ~2, 12/7/80)
8. CN Zone - This is a commercial zone intended to create and preserve
areas for businesses which are of the type providing the goods and services for the day-to-
day needs of the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Businesses in this zone shall occur
on sites no larger than one acre and shall be located and designed to encourage both
pedestrian and vehicular access and to be compatible with adjacent residential
neighborhoods. Commercial uses that are largely devoid of any impacts detrimental to
multiple family residential uses are allowed: gasoline service islands are conditionally
permitted uses. This zone provides for a variety in the urban land use pattern for small
commercial districts serving individual residential neighborhoods with direct access on an
arterial street and design standards compatible with residential development. (Ord. 2861 ~1
(part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 SI, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 ~1 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 25531,12/2/89)
June 17,2002
Page 4
227
.
.
.
.
17.01.010
.
9. CSD Zone - This is a commercial zone oriented primarily to those
businesses serving the daily needs of the surrounding residential neighborhoods but is
slightly less restrictive than the CN zone and as such provides a transition area from the
most restrictive commercial zones to those of lesser restrictions. Businesses in this zone
may occur on sites of varying sizes and shall be located at the intersections of arterial streets
of sufficient size to satisfy traffic demand and at the boundaries of neighborhoods so that
more than one neighborhood may be served. Commercial uses that are largely devoid of any
impacts detrimental to the environment are allowed: service stations with petroleum
products are permitted uses. This zone provides the basic urban land use pattern for large
lot. commercial uses serving much of the City with direct access on an arterial street and
design standards for greater automobile and truck traffic. (Ord. 2861 S 1 (part), 3/17/95;
Ord. 2797 S2, 2/11/94, Ord. 2715 SI, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 SI (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 SI
(part), 12/22/70)
10. CA Zone - This is a commercial zone intended to create and preserve
areas for business serving the entire City and needing an arterial location because of the
nature of the business or intensity of traffic generated by the business. Commercial uses that
are largely devoid of any impacts detrimental to the environment are allowed: service
stations with petroleum products and dry cleaning shops with hazardous materials are
permitted uses. This zone provides the basic urban land use pattern for automobile oriented.
commercial uses with direct access on a principal arterial street and design standards for
greater automobile and truck traffic. (Ord. 2861 SI (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 SI, 10/16/92;
Ord. 2668 SI (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 2293 SI (part), 4/4/84)
11. CBD Zone - This is a commercial zone intended to strengthen and
preserve the area commonly known as the Downtown for major retail, service, financial, and
other commercial operations that serve the entire community, the regional market, and
tourists. It is further the purpose of this zone to establish standards to improve pedestrian
access and amenities and to increase public enjoyment of the shoreline. Commercial uses
that are largely devoid of any impacts detrimental to the environment are allowed: gasoline
service islands and marine fueling stations are conditionally permitted uses. This zone
provides the basic urban land use pattern for high density. pedestrian oriented. commercial
uses located in the center of the City with direct access to mass transit services. design
standards for compatible commercial development. and support for public parking and
business improvements. (Ord. 2861 SI (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 SI, 10/16/92; Ord.2668
SI (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 230391 (part), 7/4/84; Ord.1709 SI (part), 12/22/70)
12. IP Zone - This is an industrial zone intended to create and preserve
areas for office, commercial, and industrial uses devoid of exterior nuisances in a planned,
park-like setting. While industrial and commercial uses that are devoid of any impacts
detrimental to the environment are allowed. vehicle service stations with petroleum products
and entertainment businesses with adult-only activities are also permitted uses. and a variety
of maintenance and repair shops with hazardous materials are also conditionally permitted
uses. This zone provides for a variety in the urban land use pattern for mixed industrial and
commercial uses with direct access on an arterial street. design standards for high density.
.
June 17,2002
Page 5
228
17.01.010
pedestrian oriented. mixed uses located adjacent to major transportation facilities. design
standards for compatible mixed industrial and commercial development and support for
private parking and business improvements. (Ord. 2861 ~ 1 (part), 3/17/95)
13. IL Zone - This is an industrial zone intended to create and preserve
areas for industrial uses which are largely devoid of exterior nuisances in close proximity to
airports and highways. While industrial and commercial uses that are largely devoid of any
impacts detrimental to the environment are allowed. vehicle service stations with petroleum
products and entertainment businesses with adult-only activities are also permitted uses. and
a variety of maintenance and repair shops with hazardous materials are also conditionally
permitted uses. This zone provides the basic urban land use pattern for light industrial uses
with direct access on an arterial street design standards for greater truck traffic. and buffers
for nonindustrial uses. (Ord. 2861 ~1 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 ~1, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 ~1
(part), 1/17/92; Ord. 2329 ~ 1 (part), 3/11/85)
14. IH Zone - This is the least restrictive industrial zone intended to be
the area in which heavy industry could develop causing the least impact on other land uses.
Significant adverse impacts can be expected from permitted industrial uses that involve
hazardous materials. noise. air and water pollution. shift work around the clock.
entertainment businesses with adult-only activities. and outside storage yards and
manufacturing activities. This zone provides the basic urban land use pattern for heavy
industrial uses with direct access to major transportation facilities. design standards for
greater truck traffic. and buffers for nonindustrial uses unless deemed impractical. (Ord.
2861 ~1 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 ~1, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 ~1 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 ~1
(part), 12/22170)
15. PBP Zone - A zoning designation for publicly-owned property, or
property less suitable for development by reason of its topography, geology, or some unusual
condition or situation. Much of the land so designated may best be left as "green belts."
Except for low density private residential uses. permitted uses are mostly public utilities and
large civic facilities. This zone provides the basic urban land use pattern for public facilities.
open space. and environmentally sensitive areas where public interests are directly involved
and with allowances for very low density private residential use. subject to environmental
impact mitigation. (Ord. 2861 ~1 (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 ~1, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 ~1
(part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 ~1 (part), 12/22170)
.l..Q.. FL Zone - This is a zoning designation for privately-owned property
not intended for future conversion to urban development. Much of the land so designated
may best be used for commercial timber production. This zone provides the basic nonurban
land use pattern for natural resource uses. subject to environmental impact mitigation if
converted to urban development. (Ord. 2861 ~ 1 (part), 3/17/95)
11+6. Home Occupation Conditional Use - The purpose of this Chapter is to
ensure that an occupation or business undertaken within a dwelling unit located in a
residential use district is incidental and subordinate to the primary use and is compatible
with the residential character of the neighborhood. This special use permit provides
allowances for business activities taking place within a residential use. (Ord. 2948 ~5
June 17,2002
Page 6
229
.
.
.
.
17.01.010
17.08.095
.
(part) 2/14/97; Ord. 2861 SI (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 SI, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 SI (part),
1/17/92; Ord. 2103 S2, 10/18/80)
l.8.+7. Bed and Breakfast Conditional Use - The purpose of this Chapter is to
ensure that a bed and breakfast is compatible with its surrounding properties, and when
located in a residential neighborhood, to preserve the residential character of the
neighborhood and the surrounding residences. This special use provides procedures and
regulations for business activities taking place within a residential use. (Ord. 2948 S5 (part)
2/14/97; Ord. 2861 SI (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 SI, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 SI (part),
1/17/92; Ord. 2483 S 1 (part), 3/23/88)
1.2+8-. Adult Entertainment Conditional Use - The purpose of this Chapter is
to ensure that adult entertainment businesses are appropriately located and operated within
the City of Port Angeles, are compatible with uses allowed within the City, and are
conducive to the public health, safety, and welfare. This conditional use provides
procedures and regulations for specific adult-only business activities. (Ord. 2948 S5 (part)
2/14/97; Ord. 2861 SI (part), 3/17/95; Ord. 2715 SI, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 SI (part),
1/17/92; Ord. 2511 SI, 10/4/88)
20+9. Retail Stand Conditional Use - The purpose of this Chapter is to
ensure that retail stands are appropriately located in the commercial and public building
areas, are compatible with the uses allowed in such areas, are conducive to the public health,
safety, and welfare, and promote the diversity of retail stand activity. This special use
provides procedures and regulations for mobile business activities taking place outside a
building or on public property. (Ord. 2948 S5 (part) 2/14/97; Ord. 2861 SI (part), 3/17/95;
Ord. 2715 SI, 10/16/92; Ord. 2668 SI (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 2070 SI (part), 3/29/80)
21W. Wrecking Yard Conditional Use - The purpose of this Chapter is to
ensure that licensed wrecking yards are appropriately located, are compatible with uses
allowed within the City, and are conducive to the public health, safety, and welfare. This
conditional use provides procedures and regulations for specific business activities. (Ord.
2948 S5 (part) 2/14/97; Ord. 2861 SI (part), 3/17/95)
.
17.08.095 - "S"
A. Service Station - an establishment which provides for the servicing of motor
vehicles and operations incidental thereto, limited to the retail sale of petroleum
products and automobile accessories; automobile washing (not including auto laundry);
waxing and polishing of automobiles; tire changing and repair (not including recapping);
battery service, charging, and replacement (not including repair and rebuilding); radiator
cleaning and flushing (not including steam cleaning and repair); installation of accessories;
and the following operations if conducted wholly within a building: lubrication of motor
vehicles, brake servicing, wheel balancing, tire testing, and replacement of carburetors,
coils, condensers, fan belts, wiring, water hoses, and similar parts. (Ord. 2652 S 1 (part),
9/27/91; Ord. 1709 SI (part), 12/22170)
June 17,2002
Page 7
230
17.08.095
B. Setback - the required minimum distance between any lot line and any
structure or building. (Ord. 2666 S 1 (part), 1/17/92)
C. Sign - Any letters, figures, design symbol, trademark, or device intended to
attract attention to any activity, service, place, subject, person, firm, corporation, public
performance, article, machine, or merchandise, and including display surfaces and
supporting structures thereof. (Ord. 3007 S5 (part), 1/15/99)
D. Sign, Advertising - a sign which directs attention to a business, commodity,
service or entertainment conducted, sold, or offered elsewhere than upon the premises on
which such sign is located or to which it is affixed. (Ord. 3007 S5 (part), 1/15/99; Ord. 2666
SI (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 SI (part), 12/22170)
E. Sign, Area - the area of a sign shall be the sum of each display surface
including both sides of a double-faced sign, as determined by circumscribing the exterior
limits on the ma~s of each display erected on one sign structure with a circle, triangle, or
quadrangle connecting all extreme points. Where a sign is composed of two or more
individual letters mounted directly on a wall, the total display surface, including its
background, shall be considered one sign for purposes of calculating sign area. The
structure supporting a sign is not included in determining the area of the sign, unless the
structure is designed in a way to form an integral part of the display. (Ord. 3007 S5 (part),
1/15/99; Ord. 2948 S5 (part), 2/14/97)
F. Sign, Attached - a sign or billboard, lighted or unlighted, directly attached to,
supported by, and no more than 2 feet distance from, a building. (Ord. 3007 S5 (part),
1/15/99; Ord. 2948 S5 (part), 2/14/97; Ord. 2666 S 1 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 91 (part),
12/22170)
G. Sign, Billboard - an outdoor advertising display, structure or sign, over 250
square feet in area, attached or detached, lighted or unlighted. (Ord. 3007 95 (part), 1/15/99;
Ord. 294895 (part), 2/14/97; Ord. 2666 SI (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 SI (part), 12/22170)
H. Sign, Business - a sign which directs attention to a business or profession
conducted, or to a commodity, service, or entertainment sold or offered, upon the premises
on which such sign is located or to which it is affixed. (Ord. 3007 95 (part), 1/15/99; Ord.
2948 S5 (part), 2/14/97; Ord. 2666 SI (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 170991 (part), 12/22170)
I. Sign, Detached - a sign or billboard, lighted or unlighted, which is separated
from and not a part of a building. A sign or billboard on the top of and more than two feet
in distance from a building shall be considered a detached sign. (Ord. 3007 95 (part),
1/15/99; Ord. 294895 (part), 2/14/97; Ord. 2666 91 (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 170991 (part),
12/22170)
J. Sign, Flashing - a sign which is illuminated by artificial light which is not
maintained stationary or constant in intensity and color at all times when such sign is in use.
For the purpose of this Zoning Code, a revolving illuminated sign shall also be considered a
flashing sign. (Ord. 3007 95 (part), 1/15/99; Ord. 2948 95 (part), 2/14/97; Ord. 2666 91
(part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 91 (part), 12/22170)
12/22170)
June 17, 2002
Page 8
231
.
.
.
.
17.08.095
.
K. Sign, Official Traffic, Directional, or Warning - a sign that is erected by a
public authority to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public. (Ord. 3007 S5 (part),
1/15/99; Ord. 2948 S5 (part), 2/14/97; Ord. 2666 Sl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 Sl (part),
L. Sign, Temporary - a sign constructed of cloth, canvas, cardboard, wallboard,
or other lightweight material, intended to be displayed for a limited period of time, not to
exceed thirty (30) days within a single calendar year, typically advertising a one-time event,
unless otherwise specified. (Ord. 3007 S5 (part), 1/15/99; Ord. 2948 S5 (part), 2/14/97; Ord.
2666 Sl (part), 1/17/92; Ord. 1709 Sl (part), 12/22/70)
M. Single Family Residence - one detached dwelling on an individual lot for
occupancy by one family. (Ord. 3007 S5 (part), 1/15/99; Ord. 2948 S5 (part), 2/14/97; Ord.
2796 95, 2/11/94)
I
N. Special Use Permit - a limited permission to locate a particular use at a
particular location. and which limited permission is required to modify the controls
stipulated by these Regulations in such degree as to assure that the particular use shall not
prove detrimental to surrounding properties. shall not be in conflict with the Comprehensive
Plan. and shall not be contrary to the public interest.
O. Special Use - an administrative conditional use permitted in a zone but which
requires a special degree of control to make such use consistent and compatible with other
existing or permissible uses in the same zone.
,fN. Stable, Private - a detached accessory building in which only the horses and
cows owned by the occupants of the premises are kept, and in which no horses and cows are
kept for hire, remuneration, or sale. (Ord. 3007 95 (part), 1/15/99; Ord. 2948 95 (part),
2/14/97; Ord. 279695,2/11/94; Ord. 265291 (part), 9/27/91; Ord. 170991 (part), 12/22/70)
Q6. Stand - a structure for the display and sale of products, with no space for
customers within the structure itself. (Ord. 3007 95 (part), 1/15/99; Ord. 2948 95 (part),
2/14/97; Ord. 279695,2/11/94; Ord. 265291 (part), 9/27/91; Ord. 170991 (part),
12/22/70)
RP. Stealth - relating to siting strategies and technological innovations designed
to enhance compatibility with adjacent land uses by designing structures to resemble other
features in the surrounding environment. "Stealth" techniques include architecturally
screened roof-mounted antennas, antennas integrated into architectural elements, and towers
designed to resemble light poles, power poles, flag poles, street standards, steeples, or trees,
etc. (Ord. 3089 S2 (part), 6/29/2001)
.s.(t. Story - the space between the floor and the ceiling above said floor. A
basement shall be considered a story when more than half of the basement height is above
the finished lot grade. (Ord. 3089 92 (part), 6/29/2001; Ord. 3007 95 (part), 1/15/99; Ord.
294895 (part), 2/14/97; Ord. 279695,2/11/94; Ord. 265291 (part), 9/27/91; Ord. 170991
(part), 12/22170)
IR. Street - a public right-of-way which affords a primary means of access to
abutting property. (Ord. 3089 92 (part), 6/29/2001; Ord. 3007 95 (part), 1/15/99; Ord. 2948
95 (part), 2/14/97; Ord. 2796 95,2/11/94; Ord. 2652 91 (part), 9/27/91; Ord. 170991 (part),
12/22/70)
.
June 17,2002
Page 9
232
17.08.095
US. Street Right-of-Way Line - the boundary line between a street and abutting
property. (Ord. 3089 S2 (part), 6/29/2001; Ord. 3007 S5 (part), 1/15/99; Ord. 2948 S5
(part), 2/14/97; Ord. 2796 S5, 2/11/94; Ord. 2652 SI (part), 9/27/91; Ord. 1709 SI (part),
12/22170)
Yf. Structure - anything constructed in the ground, or anything erected which
requires location on the ground or water, or is attached to something having location on or in
the ground or water, but not including fences or walls used as fences six feet or less in
height. (Ord. 3089 S2 (part), 6/29/2001; Ord. 3007 S5 (part), 1/15/99; Ord. 2948 S5 (part),
2/14/97; Ord. 2796 S5, 2/11/94; Ord. 2652 SI (part), 9/27/91; Ord. 1709 SI (part),
12/22170)
WB. Structural Alteration - any change, other than incidental repairs, which would
prolong the life of the supporting members of a building, such as bearing walls, columns,
beams, or girders. (Ord. 3089 S2 (part), 6/29/2001; Ord. 3007 S5 (part), 1/15/99; Ord. 2948
S5 (part), 2/14/97; Ord. 2796 S5, 2/11/94; Ord. 2652 SI (part), 9/27/91; Ord. 1709 SI
(part), 12/22170)
XV. Subordinate - less important than and secondary to a primary object, usually
in these Zoning Regulations referring to an accessory use. (Ord. 3089 S2 (part), 6/29/2001;
Ord. 3007 S5 (part), 1/15/99; Ord. 2948 S5 (part), 2/14/97; Ord. 2921 S2, 6/28/96; Ord.
2861 SI (part), 3/17/95)
YW. Supermarket - a grocery store on a site larger than one acre and with multiple
retail departments such as drugs, photo, video, deli, flowers, seafood, bakery, etc. (Ord.
3089 S2 (part), 6/29/2001; Ord. 3007 S5 (part), 1/15/99; Ord. 2948 S5 (part), 2/14/97; Ord.
2861 SI (part), 3/17/95)
June 17,2002
Page 10
233
.
.
.
/
CLALLAM COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR, BOB MARTIN
BUILDING DMSION / FIRE MARsHAL
ENVIORNMENTAL HEALTH DIVlSION
PLANNING DIVISION
NATURAL RESOURCES DMSION
CLALLAM COUNTY COURTHOUSE
P.O. Box 863 /223 EAST FOURTH STREET
PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON 98362-0149
(360) 417-2321, FAX: (360) 417-2443
June 3, 2002
f5)lE ~ [E ~ Wi [Ern!
~. JUN - 3 2002 lW
.!:>-s-A
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Brad Collins, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Port Angeles
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
.
Re: Response to Request for Comments
Dear Brad;
Thank you for providing the background materials on the annexation and draft
comprehensive plan and municipal code amendments that are being proposed by the
City. After our meeting this week, I have a clearer understanding of the genesis and
scope of these projects, and I wanted to provide the County's comments prior to the
City Council deliberations that start on June 4,2002. Secondly, in terms of process
issues, I believe we identified what "broke down" in the commenUcommunicative
process, and from what we discussed, you've taken steps to insure that the County will
be included in the draft review process at an earlier stage.
1.
Municipal Annexation; West of City Landfill I East of Lower Elwha Road
.
As we discussed, we have resolved the apparent records discrepancies
as outlined in my memo to you dated May 21, 2002. Our current map
was in error, and this area is, in fact, within the adopted UGA boundary.
In terms of the zoning and comprehensive plan issues, your memo of
May 30, 2002 (attached), clarified the City's interest to designate the land
as "open space", and zone it ("PBP Public Buildings and Parks"). I would
concur that this is the appropriate designation given your intent to have
this area serve as a buffer between the landfill and the Dry Creek ravine,
and to eliminate an access easement across the landfill site to a
previously designated residential property.
234
//
/
2.
.
Proposed Amendments to Comprehensive Plan (CPA 02-01)
I have reviewed the proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan as
outlined in the May 8, 2002 and May 22, 2002 staff memos to the City
Planning Commission. Many of these relate solely to City issues and
concerns, but the County does want to indicate its support of the proposed
changes that will support our joint goals of enhancing economic
development opportunities, clarifying shoreline, harbor and land use
planning issues, and enhancing transportation and capital facilities
planning.
3. Proposed Amendments to Municipal Code
I
I have reviewed the proposed draft changes to the City's Municipal Code
as outlined in the staff report to the Planning Commission dated May 22,
2002, and contained in Attachments B - E. You and I also reviewed these
during out meeting this past week, and I now have a better idea of the
nature of the changes. It appears that many of these changes are being
made to clarify and simplify development regulations, and eliminate
conflicting language, which is always of benefit!
The one issue that remains of concern to the County relates to the City's
sign standards, particularly those in the Commercial Arterial Zone. As I .
understand it, the City is not proposing to change its standards relating to
off-premise signs in this district, except for the addition of a size limit of
600 square feet, where there currently is no size limitation. Signs of this
type are still limited to sites which do not contain any sign for businesses
located on those sites, and they are subject to a conditional use permit.
As we have discussed, the County's concern is that this zoning district
(CA) -is what the City has indicated is likely to be applied to the Highway
101 corridor in eastern Port Angeles UGA upon any annexation, and the
proposed 600 square feet sign standard is over 4 % times larger than the
current County standard of 128 square feet. While the County recognizes
that this area is an existing business corridor, it is also a state-designated
scenic highway,. and the County's goal has been to allow effective,
business signage that balances the issues of retaining scenic vistas, while
enhancing the image of the Port Angeles area as a tourist destination.
We believe that the signage size and height found at new or recently-
renovated businesses such as Wal Mart, Safeway Plaza, Bargain
Warehouse, Les Schwab, and others, reflects how this balance can be
achieved.
In our discussions, you indicated that there have been few off-premise
signs that have come in for review under these provisions. I would agree .
that this may be related to the lack of parcels without existing businesses
235 2
.
.
.
,,/
within the present CA zoned area. This may not be the case within the
UGA area, where there are significantly more vacant parcels.
The County would simply like the City to consider whether this standard
for off-premises signs is designed to achieve the long-range vision
outlined in our jointly adopted Regional Plan for this area. J've attached
some of the relevant policy statements which speak to reduced sign size
and visual enhancements to this entrance of the City. We believe our
adopted sign standards will, over time, help to achieve these objectives,
and we would encourage the City's standards to do the same.
I hope these comments are helpful, and if there are any questions please
give me ~ call.
Sincerely,
A~.~
Planning Director
cc: Mike Quinn; City Manager
Board of County Commissioners
Dan Engelbertson; County Administrator
Bob Martin; Director/DCD
Russ Veenema; Port Angeles Chamber of Commerce
236
3
.
.
.
237
.
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
CITY MANAGER'S CALENDAR / REPORT
June 17,2002
City Council Retreat Saturday, June 15 9:00 a.m.- noon
Community Multi-Cultural Task Force Meeting Monday, June 17 1 :00 p.m.
City Council Special Meeting - Capital Facilities Plan Monday, June 17 4:30 p.m.
Workshop (continued from June 4, 2002 CIty Council meetmg)
City Council Meeting (movedfrom June 18th) Monday, June 17 6:00 p.m.
. A WC Annual Conference Tuesday, June 18 - 21 Out-of-Office
Finance Committee Meeting - cancelled Thursday, June 20 10:00 a.m.
Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission Tour Thursday, June 20 5:30 p.m.
Downtown Forward Executive Committee Meeting Monday, June 24 7:30 a.m.
Utility Advisory Committee Meeting - tentative Monday, June 24 4:00 p.m.
Outstanding Public Service A ward Luncheon - VBMCC Tuesday, June 25 11 :30 a.m.
North Olympic Peninsula Cities Association Meeting Wednesday, June 25 6:00 p.m.
Law Enforcement Advisory Committee Meeting Wednesday, June 26 6:30 p.m.
Planning Commission Meeting Wednesday, June 26 7:00 p.m.
Finance Committee Meeting Thursday, June 27 10:00 a.m.
Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission Meeting - Special Thursday, June 27 7:00 p.m.
Meeting re: Skate Park
.
Board of Adjustment Meeting
City Council Meeting
Independence Day Holiday
Monday, July 1
Tuesday, July 2
Thursday, July 4
Wednesday, July 10
7:00 p.m.
6:00 p.m.
Closed
Planning Commission Meeting
7:00 p.m.
238
.
.
.
239
.
.
.
~;O'R,iT:~/ N,G' iE:'IILE,'iS
,.JI ~ . It'. I J. ~ _If ' i
V
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
June 17, 2002
To:
MA YOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT:
2001 Annual Recycling Report j)V-L/
The recycling report covers landfill recycling, curbside collection, yard waste collection,
cardboard collection, and public education efforts for calendar year 2001. Overall recycling saw
a dip in 2001 by 592 tons (7%) due to diverting yard waste to a private business. The remaining
recycled items actually increased by 846 tons (19%). In retrospect it was a good year.
T bIlL dfill RId T
a e : an 1 ecyc e onna~e
Materials 2000 2001 % Change
Tin, Aluminum, Glass 225 304 36
Mixed Paper 228 368 62
Cardboard 149 186 26
Yard Debris 3,359 2,175 (36)
Bio-solids 1,422 1,435 1
Tires 30 71 136
Metal 560 660 16
Oil 25 30 18
Antifreeze 2 3 28
Batteries(auto) 12 18 31
Freon 0.1 0.1 0
Total 6,012.1 5,250.1 -13%
Total wlo yard waste 2,653.1 3,075.1 16%
240
Table 2: Curbside Collections
(all items less yard waste)
2000 2001 % Change
Set outs 118,000 126,000 7
Recycle (tons) 902 1,119 20
Average Participation 35% 37% 2
.
Table 3: Curbside Yard Waste Collections
2000 2001 % Change
Yard Debris Set outs 28,000 33,000 16
Yard debris (tons) 1,023 771 (25)
Average Participation 9% 10% 1%
Table 4: Commercial Cardboard Collections (Tons)
2000 2001 Change
837 1,044 21%
Table 5: All Materials Recycled through City Programs
(Tables 1 -4)
2000 2001 2001
Tons 8,774.1 8184.1 ( 7%)
Tons w/o yard 4,392.1 5,238.1 19%
waste
.
Public Education:
1. KONP Home Show: Promote recycling, collections, and hand out information on
City programs
2. Benefit Dump Day: Promote recycling
3. Clallam County Fair: Promote recycling, collections, and hand out information on
City programs.
4. Hamilton and Monroe Schools: Recycling presentations
5. Olympic Kiwanis: Recycling information
6. Exchange Club: Recycling information
7. ClallamlJefferson Solid Waste Regional Meetings: Discuss recycling issues
8. Household Hazardous Waste Collection Days: Collect hazardous materials
9. Wal-Mart Green Team Awards Program: Recycling presentation
10. Recycling at City Sponsored Events: Juan de Fuca Festival of the Arts, Festival of
Trees and Clallam County Fair
12. Peninsula Daily News: Ads and flyers
13. Kiwanis Kid Festival: Recycling activities
.
N.\PWKS\SW ASTE\reportCC2001_A.wpd
241
.
Z
360-457-4519 · 115 East Railroad · Port Angeles, WA 98362
Beck Upton
City Clerk
City of Port Angeles
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
RE: Winter Sports Bus Billing
Dear Becky,
Please forward our thanks to the City of Port Angeles for their continued support of the
Hurricane Ridge Winter Sports Bus program. This past season was by far our best year ever for
the Hurricane Ridge Ski Area both in the total number of skier visits and also in the number of
persons utilizing the Winter Sports Bus. Our ridership for the months of January, February and
March of 2002 was 453 and we operated the program a total of 24 days.
.
A new service this year with the bus was our 11 :30 am departure. This second run up the
mountain proved to be very successful and on two occasions this year we reached our
maximum capacity for the Bus.
I have enclosed a spreadsheet showing a financial breakdown for this program. Please forward
the City's contribution for the Winter Sports Bus in the amount of $2,500.00 to the Hurricane
Ridge Public Development Authority at your earliest convenience.
Again please forward our sincerest appreciation to the City Council for their continued support of
this important program.
Cordially,
HURRICANE RIDGE
PUBLIC DEVELOPM T AUTHORITY
rtis Shuck,
General Manager
. cc. Jim Schultz, ONP
Steve Oliver, President · Roger Oakes, Vice President. Mike Quinn, Vice President. Bill James, Treasurer
Mike Doherty. Gary Holmquist. Jim J~41~ Wiggins. Bruce Skinner, Executive Director
6/8/02
Income:
453 Riders
City PA
Expense:
Invoice 02-0201
Invoice 02-0403
$461 avg.
Sheet1
2002 Hurricane Ridge
Winter Sports Bus
Financial Analysis
.
$2,089 00
$2,500.00
Total
$4,589.00
$1,497.81
$3,099 36
Total
$4,597.17
<-$8.17>
.
.
2~3
.
.
.
Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission
May 9,2002
Minutes
I. Call to Order
The May 9, 2002, meeting of the Parks, Recreation and Beautification
Commission was called to order at 5:57 pm in the High School Library by
Chairman, David Morris.
II. Roll Call:
Members Present: David Morris, Diana Tschimperle, Matt Kirsch, and Chuck
Whidden. I
Members Absent: Larry Little, Patrick Deja, and Damaris Rodriguez.
Staff Present: Marc Connelly, Mari A. Bilsborrow, and Ralph Dyker.
Audience: Susan Kimbro and Jordan Brock representing Cingular Wireless
III.
Approval of Minutes & Audio Tape Disposition - April 11.2002:
Chairman Morris called for comments or amendments regarding the April11,
2002 minutes. Referencing page four, Chuck Whidden asked about the status
of the letter in regards to Dry Creek School Fields. Staff replied that several
community providers will be meeting to discuss service delivery issues such as
this.
Chuck Whidden moved to approve the April 11, 2002 minutes. Matt Kirsch
seconded the motion. Upon call for the question motion carried unanimously.
IV. Items From Audience not on Agenda:
None
V. Legislation
a. Shane Park Cingular Wireless Antenna Lease
Cingular Wireless is requesting a lease to install and operate a wireless
antenna facility in Shane Park. Current City Telecommunications policies
encourage use of public property for locating these facilities.
Staff recommented that the Park Commission review the request and
proposed lease.
Staff recommended that the Commission review only for the proposed
conditions contained in the lease. Cingular needs to obtain a
Unconditional Use Permit for installing a telecommunications facility within
the City, therefore the Park Commission comments and review are also
required to be reviewed by the Planning Commission before finalization.
The Park Commission asked why conditions attached to this proposal
244
Park Commission
May 9, 2002
2
.
weren't on the Voice Stream Lease. Staff responded that the City review
process and the conditions at Shane Park were different but the main
intent of this proposal is to mirror the Voice Stream installation.
Proposed conditions by the City will be to ask Cingular to move the
overhead wires underground and maintain the plants used for screening
the equipment enclosure.
Diana Tschimperle pointed out a difference between the Voice Stream
wireless antenna and the proposed request from Cingular. The Park
Commission agreed to the Voice Stream proposal as the antenna would
replace a current field light pole. According to the site plan, the Cingular
antenna looks as though it sits by the road next to the ballfields.
Matt Kirsch asked if running the electrical conduit underground would
interfere with any future park improvements. Staff responded that the
current recommendations are a direct result of parks maintenance crew
review. Staff requested moving the equipment cabinet south west of
location requested by Cingular which would move it into a cluster of trees.
Mr. Kirsch also asked if the maintenance of the shrubbery would become .
a problem, and would Cingular to contract that out. Staff responded that
the maintenance would be up to Cingular.
The Parks Commission discussed the issue of requiring Cingular to
maintain shrubbery on park property, they felt it wasn't necessary; the
parks department should taking care of this.
Current lease rate was discussed. Staff assured the Parks Commission
that the current rate is being researched by the City Attorney, Staff will
propose that the lease fee reflect the current rate.
Staff reiterated the need for the Park Commission to comment on the
proposed lease conditions. Lease conditions will be conveyed to the
Planning Commission for discussion and comments. After the
conditional permit is approved, the formal lease will come back to the Park
Commission for approval.
In regards to the Attachment B conditions, Matt Kirsch suggested striking
number four and incorporate a phrase which states "return the area to its
original vegetative state". All Commission members agreed.
b. Art Feiro Marine Life Center Contract: .
The operations of the Marine Life Center are managed through the
administration of an annual operating agreement between the City and its
245
.
.
.
Park Commission
May 9, 2002
3
selected operator and are subject to the approval by the City Council.
Funding for the contract is part of the approved 2002 budget.
Staff reminded the Parks Commission that they requested during the 2002
season that consideration be given to extending the hours of operation
during the summer months. Since no additional funds were allocated in
the budget for the current operating year, these hours have not been
adjusted. However, staff is working closely with the Marine Life center to
determine if there are days where the hours could be adjusted on a
temporary basis on certain weekends to determine whether staying open
until 8 p.m. would increase attendance. The college also operates a
limited off-season schedule on weekends until May 30.
Staff pointed out that this contract is the same as last year.
David Morris asked what the income of the Marine Life Center is. The
Commission agreed that they would like to see some numbers regarding
this part of the operation.
Matt Kirsch moved to recommend acceptance of the Art Feiro Marine Life
Center Operating contract. Diana Tschimperle seconded the motion.
Hearing no further discussion; upon call for the question the motion
carried unanimously.
VI.
Other Considerations
a. June Park Site Tour Proposal
On an annual basis, the Park Commission visits several park sites. This
years tour will take place during the Park Commission's regular meeting
date of June 20th. Discussion ensued regarding this years recommended
locations:
*Ocean View Cemetery
*10th & N Street -adjacent to
*Shane Park
*Charles R. Willson Park
*Erickson Playfield
*Mt. Angeles Property (owned by Green Crow)
*Rayonier Trail Extension
*Lions Park
VII. Park Board Late Items
Short discussion and update ensued regarding the "Dream" playground at
Erickson Playfield. The steering committee has been meeting regularly and
providing updates in a timely manner.
246
Park Commission
May 9,2002
Chuck Whidden commented favorably on the Summer Parks Program Brochure.
It was pointed out that Jake Seniuk did a great job on the cover and ad for the
Fine Arts Center.
VIII. Executive Session
None
IX. Adiournment
Chuck Whidden moved to adjourn. Diana Tschimperle seconded the motion
which carrie~ unanimously.
Next Meeting: Park Commission members will meet at 5:30, June 20th, at the
Vern Burton Center to commence the annual Park Tour.
247
4
.
.
.
.
.
.
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
May 22, 2002
7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Bob Philpott, Fred Hewins, Chuck Schramm, Rick Porter,
Leonard Rasmussen
Members Excused:
Mary Craver, Fred Norton
Staff Present:
Brad Collins, Sue Roberds, Scott Johns
Public Present:
Jack Anderson, Eycke Strikland
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Porter moved to approve the April 24, 2002, Planning Commission minutes as
revised. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hewins and passed 5 - O.
Commissioner Philpott moved to approve the May 8, 2002, Planning Commission minutes as
presented. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Porter and passed 4 - 1 with
Commissioner Hewins abstaining due to absence at the meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING:
2002 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Proposed
annual amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Director Collins described corrections to the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Map copies that
were sent to Commissioners for review. Corrections were proposed extending the commercial zone
further east from Lincoln Street to include property along the shoreline owned by Jack Glaubert and
Jerry Austin east ofthe Red Lion Inn and property west of Valley Street to Sunset Wire Rope along
Marine Drive. Chair Schramm opened the public hearing.
Jack Anderson Environmental and Site Manager for Rayonier, 700 North Ennis Street, asked
that, on behalf of Rayonier, issues relating to any redesignation of portions of the Rayonier site be
postponed at this time until the remedial investigation has been further evaluated and documented.
Sampling of materials will be done later in 2002 and it is hoped that the results of that testing will
be available by early 2003.
In response to Commissioner Hewins, Mr. Anderson answered that he cannot guarantee that the
sampling work and report will be available and submitted to the City by March, 2003. It is not
248
Plannmg CommISSIOn Mmutes
May 22, 2002
Page 2
possible given the number of agencies involved to assure that time frame. It is likely that soil .
sampling will be completed and a draft report will probably be available by March, 2003, but he
doubted the final report will have been completed by that time given the review process.
In response to Commissioner Schramm, Mr. Anderson stated that the past summer's work included
the removal ofthe large SSL lagoon and the removal of approximately 20,000 cubic yards of solid
waste material. The dock repair has not as yet been completed but is anticipated for the near future.
Upcoming work for this summer will include the removal of petroleum contaminated soils along
Ennis Creek and in the location of an oil tank and maintenance shop.
There being no one else who wished to speak, Chair Schramm closed the public hearing.
In response to a suggestion from Commissioner Hewins, Director Collins confirmed that the
Commission should continue the Comprehensive Plan amendment application rather than assume
that a new application would be submitted for potential changes to the Rayonier site in 2003.
Commissioner Hewins asked if the City is giving up its own property, which is now designated
parking, for the Gateway project? Director Collins answered that some City property would be
incorporated into the Gateway project. Commissioner Hewins believed that some of the
Comprehensive Plan proposed objectives, specifically those dealing with the issue of no net parking
loss in the Downtown, puts the onus on the City to replace parking that was privately provided in
the past. Proposed Objective FA appears to make the City responsible to replace displaced parking. .
Director Collins noted that proposed objective FA came from a request from the Port Angeles
Downtown Association (P ADA). It appears that the objective would hold the City responsible for
maintaining no net loss of parking.
Mr. Collins clarified that the P ADA is interested in the City replacing parking as a result of the
Gateway project. Commissioner Schramm concurred that the proposed objective only deals with
that parking that would be displaced by the Gateway project in the Downtown. Commissioner
Hewins did not agree that the City should be obligated to replace parking displaced by the Gateway
project - a private developer would not be so charged. Director Collins did not disagree and
explained that the language was developed at the suggestion of stakeholders in the Downtown area
as represented by the P ADA. Adoption of the proposed objective would in fact make the City
promise to replace the displaced parking where at present the City is negotiating to do so.
Commissioner Hewins did not agree that an objective should be proposed supporting an ice skating
rink in the Downtown. Director Collins noted that the proposed objective wording does not commit
but indicates that the City will study such a use in the Downtown. Commissioners Rasmussen and
Hewins agreed that these types of specific issues do not need to be included in the Comprehensive
Plan but should go the normal route for review prior to support. Mr. Collins noted that the use is
being considered at the request of the Chamber of Commerce and a City Councilperson. If the
Planning Commission does not agree with the specifics of certain objectives, those objections should
be noted in the Commission's recommendation to the City Council. Commissioner Schramm stated
that his review of the proposed objectives to the Comprehensive Plan was under the assumption that
the objectives would undergo varying degrees of interpretation but basically would not commit any
.
249
.
.
Plannmg CommiSSIOn Mmutes
May 22, 2002
Page 3
public monies or commit public participation to specific projects. Director Collins agreed and
further responded that the expenditure of Capital Facility funds and decisions that are made in the
future by the Planning Commission and City Council are directed by the goals, policies, and
objectives listed in the Comprehensive Plan. Projects that are specifically listed or addressed in the
Comprehensive Plan will be given a higher priority than those that are not specifically noted.
Commissioner Rasmussen wondered if it should be made clear in the Plan that the City is not
committing or implying a specific position or financial support of certain projects by listing those
projects. Director Collins responded that those decisions would be up to City officials who would
be approving specific projects. An objective is a proposal in the Comprehensive Plan that is a type
of promise that something will be done. If obj ectives are not met, they should be removed from the
Plan.
Director Collins explained the proposed policy for the City to consider the vacation of certain alleys
or streets to achieve a desired urban design for the City. The proposed policy is to recognize that,
in commercial areas, the City is interested in allowing the assembling ofland in order to achieve the
type of development that is desired. Such a policy would be mainly to assist in the development of
properties that are separated by a right-of-way and owned by the same owner.
Commissioner Hewins stated that he has a definite problem with identifying a specific use such as
a proposed ice skating rink in the Downtown as part of the Comprehensive Plan amendments. He
did not believe that singling out a particular use is appropriate just because it is suggested by a
certain group. He also objected to the proposal (Item #7 ofthe Port Angeles Downtown Association
and Chamber of Commerce proposals) that indicates" The City will develop various parking options
including the construction of a parking structure... to mitigate parking impacts from the Gateway
Project to achieve no net loss of parking..." being in the Comprehensive Plan. Such negotiation
should not be part ofthe Comprehensive Plan but should be part of other negotiations. This puts the
responsibility on the City, and not all parking belongs to the City. Additional bicycle friendly
objectives are redundant as there are already many references in the Comprehensive Plan stating the
City's intentions to provide non motorized opportunities when possible. In general, he believed that
most of the proposals that were formulated from a letter from the Downtown Association are not
appropriate nor need to be included in the Plan. Approval of a commercial objective to support a
waterfront promenade along Railroad Avenue will result in the loss of either street, sidewalk, or
water area if developed.
It was decided that a poll should be taken on each policy, objective, and map change to determine
the Commission's recommendations on the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. The
May 22, 2002, staff report was reviewed item by item with each item being voted upon individually:
Land Use Element
Add new Commercial Policy D(3) -- The City should vacate rights-ofway to facilitate retention
of existing businesses and location of new businesses where land assembly is necessary to achieve
. the desired urban design of the City.
Commissioner Rasmussen objected to the proposal because he did not believe it is necessary
to include these type of actions within the Plan itself but should be handled separately. The
250
Plannzng CommISSIOn MlIlutes
May 22, 2002
Page 4
Commission agreed 4 - I to recommend approval of the proposal with Commissioner .
Hewins voting against.
Add new Commercial Objective D(l) -- The City will work with the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe
to develop a cultural center and marina for large pleasure boats located in Port Angeles Harbor.
Commissioner Porter had no real objections to the proposal but was not sure there is a real
need for such a development. The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the
proposal.
Add new Commercial Objective D(2) -- The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that
designates land uses, I improves public access to shorelines, abates deteriorating structures, and
allows for expanded recreational and commercial uses.
Commissioner Rasmussen noted that this objective is repeated in Open Space Objective J(4)
and Conservation Element D(2). He suggested the polling be taken as a group. The
Commission agreed to recommend approval of the three proposals 5 - O.
Add new Commercial Policy F(4) -- The City should work with the Port Angeles Downtown
Association to develop urban desIgn review guidelines that facilitate architectural elementslfeatures
which will encourage complimentary and aesthetically pleasing new development in the Central
Business District (CBD). .
Commissioner Hewins was opposed to the policy. It is not appropriate for the City to set
urban desjgn guideljnes but should be up to the busjness owners and groups as a whole to
collectively agree on desjgn issues. Commjssjoner Rasmussen thought that jf desjgn revjew
gujdelines are to be established for aesthe6cally pleasing development jt should not be
restricted to the Downtown. The concept should be broadened. Djrector Comns noted that
the Downtown has tended to take the lead on these types of jssues. Such poljcjes could be
expanded to other areas of the Cjty jf there is jnterest. The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to
recommend approval of the policy.
Add new Commercial Objective F(1) -- The City will assist the Chamber of Commerce and the
Port Angeles Downtown Assoczation in developing an historic underground walking tour activity
focused on Laurel Street.
Commjssioner Hewjns was opposed to the objective. The Commission agreed 4 - I to
recommend approval of the objective with Commissioner Hewins voting against.
Add new Commercial Objective F(2) -- The City will assist the Chamber of Commerce and the
Port Angeles Downtown Association in developing a waterfront promenade along the Downtown
waterfront.
Commissjoner Hewjns objected for reasons previously stated. Commissjoner Rasmussen
agreed with Commissioner Hewins' previous statement that such an objectjve would result
.
251
Planmng CommISSIOn Minutes
May 22, 2002
Page 5
.
in the loss of either street, sidewalk, or water areas. The Commission agreed 3 - 2 to
recommend approval of the objective with Commissioners Hewins and Rasmussen voting
against.
Add new Commercial Objective F(3) -- The City will encourage community events such as holiday
ceremonies, town gatherings, arts and crafts displays, and special business activities such as a
Farmers' Market during the tourist season, particularly in the Downtown area and on Laurel Street.
Commissioner Hewins would have no problem with the objective ifthe words "...area and
on Laurel Street" were removed. He was concerned that such activities would specifically
be focused on Laurel Street. He did not understand whether the City is looking at promoting
tourism on public property with no remuneration as opposed to encouraging the use of
properties in general where private properties could be generating income from the activities
rather than use of the City right-of-way with no remuneration. He had no objection to
Downtown area uses in general. The Commlssion agreed 4 - 1 to recommend approval of the
objective with Commissioner Hewins voting against.
Add new Commercial Objective F(4) -- The City will develop various parking options including
the construction of a parking structure and the purchase of surface parking lot(s) to mitigate parking
impacts from the Gateway Project to achieve no net loss of parking for customer parking, City
permit parking, and long term parking.
.
Commissioner Hewins felt that the proposed wording appears to bind the City's hands in
future negotiations. It was proposed to change the wording to read "The City will consider
dcvclop various parking options including thc construction of a parking structurc and thc
purchasc ofsurfacc parking lot(s) to mitigate parking impacts from the Gateway Project te
achicve no nct loss of parking for customcr parking, City pcnnit parking, and long tcrm
parking. The Commission agreed 4 - 1 to recommend approval of the objective as modified
with Commissioner Hewins voting against.
Add new Industrial Objective 11(1) -- The City will develop an industrial marine (1M) zone for
shoreline uses similar to the upland industrial park (IP) zone which allows for mixed commercial
and industrial uses
The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective.
Add new Industrial Objective 11(2) -- The City will establish a Harbor Study committee comprised
of private and public stakeholders in harbor uses and activities to review and revise the Harbor
Resource Management Plan, considering changes that have occurred in the past 12 years and
visions that now seem possible.
The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective
. Add new Open Space Objective J(2) -- The City will review new developmentfor covered areas
or wind screens to allow greater use of outdoor facilities and public spaces during inclement
weather.
252
Planmng CommiSSIOn Mmutes
May 22. 2002
Page 6
Director Collins noted that the proposals will be forwarded to the City Council as written with a
recommendation from the Planning Commission and, in some cases, a second recommendation from
staff. In response to Commissioner Porter as to why two different proposals might be forwarded,
Director Collins noted that staff may feel the need to forward an alternate recommendation.
.
Commissioner Hewins asked how the review of new development for covered areas or wind
screens fits with land use decisions the City is charged to regulate. He believed that these
types of requirements should be up to individual business owners and not under the
jurisdiction or review ofthe City. The Commission agreed 4 - 1 to recommend approval of
the objective with Commissioner Hewins voting against.
Add new Open Space Objective J(3) -- TI1e City will work with the Port of Port Angeles in the
development of a public golf course.
The wording was changed to read" The City will support work with thc Port of Port Angeles
in-the development of a public golf course" because the original wording restricts the support
to that of a Port of Port Angeles development. The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend
approval of the objective.
Add new Open Space Objective J(4) -- The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that
designates land uses, improves public access to shorelines, abates deteriorating structures, and
allows for expanded recreational and commercial uses.
.
The Commission earlier agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective.
Transportation Element
Add new Objective A(2) -- TI1e City will work with the property owner to assure completion of the
Waterfront Trail through the former Rayonier MIll site.
The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective.
Add new Objective A(3) -- The City will incorporate bicycle friendly amenities including bike path
development and maintenance, signage, and storage into new transportation facility improvements.
The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective with reservation from
Commissioner Rasmussen due to a question as to the extent of the City's intention to provide
physical amenities for nonpedestrian improvements over what is already contained in the
Plan.
Add new Objective A(4) -- The City will encourage public streetscape improvements such as street .
trees, seasonal displays, and pedestrian amenities through a comprehensive development and
maintenance plan.
253
.
.
.
Planmng Commlsszon Mznutes
May 22, 2002
Page 7
The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective.
Add new Objective D(2) -- The City will update transportation policies to refocus circulation
patterns, street improvements, essential state highways, truck routing, and traffic controls
throughout the Czty with particular attention to the Central Business District.
The original amendment wording was changed to read "The City will update transportation
policies to refocus circulation patterns, street improvements, essential state highways, truck
routing, and traffic controls throughout the City ',rv'ith particular attcntion to thc Ccntral
Busincss District." The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend the modified wording as it
relates to the City as a whole and does not single out anyone area.
Conservation Element
Add new Objective D(2) -- The City will develop an Ediz Hook master plan that designates land
uses, improves public access to shorelines, abates deteriorating structures, and allows for expanded
recreational and commercial uses.
The Commission earlier agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective.
Capital Facilities Element
Add new Objective A(4) -- The City will study the development of a seasonal or permanent ice
skating rinkfacility.
The Commission agreed 3 - 2 to recommend this objective not be approved. The vote was
Commissioners Rasmussen, Schramm, and Hewins "no", and Commissioners Philpott and
Porter "yes".
Add new Objective A(5) -- The City will establish a review process with a more comprehensive
analysis of Capital Facilities Plan projects to address new mandates for environmental protection
such as the Endangered Species Act, extension of urban services into the Urban Growth Area and
new residential areas within the City, and needs to preserve and maintain service levels zmpacted
by changes such as the Elwha Dam removal, landfill closure, and aging facilities.
The Commission agreed 5 - 0 to recommend approval of the objective.
Mappin2 chan2es
1) Downtown -- expansion of the commercial land use designation east along Victoria Street and
west along Marine Drive.
The Commissioners agreed 5 - 0 to the proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
changes with a revision extending the commercial zoning east of the Red Lion Inn to include
the GlaubertlAustin property and west to include the Sunset Wire Rope use on Marine Drive.
254
Planning Commission Mmutes
May 22. 2002
Page 8
2) Ediz Hook -- expansion ofthe commercial land use designation east of the Sail and Paddle Park .
along the shoreline inside Port Angeles Harbor.
Commissioners Schramm voiced objection to allowing huge boathouses on Ediz Hook as
it would be a tremendous visual impairment to the landscape of the Hook. Such a use would
be better proposed against the bluff, say in the Rayonier area, where the use would basically
be out of sight and in a more protected area. Ediz Hook is an irreplaceable resource that
should be protected.
In response to Commissioner Porter, Director Collins an~wered that development of a Tribal use
would not necessarily be subject to normal state requirements for overwater development. The City
would rely on the Elwha Tribe as opposed to the Washington State Department ofFish and Wildlife
to protect fisheries resources. Commissioners Porter and Schramm were opposed to the amendment.
Commissioner Philpott hoped that owners of the large boats would bring an increased economy to
the area. Commissioner Hewins suggested that the proposal could allow the outlying areas of the
Harbor to be better utilized. Commissioner Rasmussen hoped that a new yacht basin would draw
people to the area as an attraction. The Commission agreed 3 - 2 to recommend approval of the
proposed map change with Commissioners Schramm and Porter voting against..
3) Rayonier -- defer expansion of the commercial land use designation on the former Rayonier Mill
site until completion of the MTCA remedial investigation study is done.
It was agreed 5 - 0 to defer consideration of any change in the designation of the Rayonier
site until the remedial investigation is complete. Commissioner Hewins agreed but noted for
the record that he does not believe this issue should be under consideration particularly with
consideration of a new Industrial Marine zone for the area.
.
Commissioner Hewins moved to recommend that the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use 1Vlap
be amended per staff's May 22, 2002, memorandum with modifications as previously approved
by the Planning Commission citing the following findings and conclusions:
Findings:
1. The State Legislature mandated that cities and counties subject to the Growth Management
Act complete a comprehensive review of the Comprehensive Plan by September 2002 and
in the Spring 2002 changed the deadline for this update to 2004 for the City of Port Angeles.
2. The City started its comprehensive update ofthe Comp Plan in the Fall 2001 and focused
attention on the Harbor Planning Area, including Downtown and the Rayonier Mill site.
3.
The Planning Commission has held numerous informal public meetings starting in
November 2001 through March 2002.
4.
Many public agency and private property stakeholders in the Harbor and Downtown areas
have participated and made suggestions and comments regarding amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan initially adopted by the City in June 1994 in compliance with the
.
255
.
.
.
Planmng CommiSSIOn Mmutes
May 22. 2002
Page 9
Growth Management Act.
5.
The Department of Community Development staff prepared twelve applications for
Comprehensive Plan changes by March 31, 2002, expanding particularly the Comp Plan
objectives to incorporate projects and land use actions that the Harbor and Downtown
stakeholders want to see happen in the next five years.
6.
One ofthe twelve applications was the proposed utility extension policy change for services
outside the City limits, and, despite the recent State Supreme Court decision nullifying the
petition method of annexation on which the utility extension policy was based, the City has
elected to withdraw consideration of that proposed amendment.
7.
The eleven remaining proposals resulted in 13 additional Land Use Element policies and
objectives, 4 additional Transportation Element objectives, 1 additional Conservation
Element objective, 2 additional Capital Facilities Element objectives, and 3 proposed Land
Use Map changes.
8.
The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed for the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments,
and the most relevant goals, policies, and objectives included, but were not limited to,
Growth Management Element Goal A, Policy A(l)(a-m), Goal B, Land Use Element Goals
D, F, H, and J, Transportation Element Goals A and D, Conservation Element Goal D, and
Capital Facilities Element Goal A.
9. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map was reviewed relative to land use changes that may
be necessary for planned development and redevelopment along the Harbor shoreline. The
City has endorsed the Rayonier Mill Site Draft Remedial Investigation Plan, which will
provide sampling data and analysis needed for site cleanup and redevelopment.
10. A primary purpose of the proposed Comp Plan Amendments CPA 02-01 is to improve the
Plan as a planning tool for facilitating the desired urban design of the City and encourage
growth that the community wants to take place in the next five years.
11. A series of formal public hearings on the proposed Comp Plan Amendments began on May
8,2001 and are scheduled through June 4,2002.
12. Updates of other planning areas in the Comp Plan over the next two years, focusing on the
east side next year and the west side the following year, is scheduled for completing the
City's Comprehensive Plan update by the 2004 deadline. The next Comprehensive Plan
review under the Growth Management Act will be due 2011.
13.
P AMC 18.04 Comprehensive Plan 'Implementation and Amendment sets forth procedures
for annual amendment which include deadlines for applications, requirements for public
hearings, deadlines for decisions and criteria for applications and approvals of amendments.
Proposed amendments shall demonstrate: why existing provisions should not continue,
consistency with the Growth Management Act goals and specific requirements, compliance
256
Planning CommissIOn Minutes
May 22, 2002
Page 10
with County-Wide Planning Policy, compliance with capital facilities and related plans, why .
it is in the public interest, consistency with public health, safety, and welfare, and
consideration of the cumulative effects of the amendments.
14. The proposed amendments were sent to the State Office of Community Development (OCD),
affected property owners and businesses in the Harbor Planning Area, Port of Port Angeles,
Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, Clallam County, and other City Departments for review.
15. No written comments have been received at the time of the staff report.
16. On May 22, 2002, the City's SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-
Significance (L)NS) #981 and adopted the existing FEIS for the City's Comprehensive Plan
(August 6, 1993), the Addendum to the FEIS for the City's Comprehensive Plan (June 14,
1994), and FSEIS to the City's Comprehensive Plan for the Zoning Implementation
(November 14, 1995).
17. The Planning Commission held public hearings on the proposed Comprehensive Plan
Amendments CPA 02-01 on May 8 and May 22, 2002, and the City Council has scheduled
a public hearing on CPA 02-01 for June 4, 2002.
Conclusions:
1.
The City has reviewed its Comprehensive Plan and proposed updates in compliance with the
Growth Management Act, the OCD grant received by the City for the mandated review, and
the State Legislature's review deadline of September 2002.
.
2. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments are consistent with the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan, in particular with the most relevant goals, policies, and objectives
including, but were not limited to, Growth Management Element Goal A, Policy A(I)(a-m),
Goal B, Land Use Element Goals D, F, H, and J, Transportation Element Goals A and D,
Conservation Element Goal D, and Capital Facilities Element Goal A.
3. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map proposed changes will facilitate planned
development and redevelopment along the Harbor shoreline. Any redesignation of the
Rayonier Mill Site should wait until work under the Draft Remedial Investigation Plan,
which will provide sampling data and analysis needed for site cleanup and redevelopment,
has been provided to the City of Port Angeles.
4. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments are consistent with the P AMC 18.04
Comprehensive Plan Implementation and Amendment procedures for annual amendment
which include deadlines for applications, requirements for public hearings, deadlines for
decisions and criteria for applications and approvals of amendments.
5.
The proposed amendments are consistent with the Clallam County-Wide Planning Policy,
in compliance with the City's capital facilities and related plans, and consistency with public
health, safety, and welfare.
.
257
.
.
.
Planning CommiSSIOn Mznutes
May 22. 2002
Page J I
6.
Consideration of the cumulative effects of the proposed amendments based on the City's
Capital Facilities Plan and compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act through
adoption of the existing FElS for the City's Comprehensive Plan (August 6, 1993), the
Addendum to the FElS for the City's Comprehensive Plan (June 14, 1994), and FSEIS to the
City's Comprehensive Plan for the Zoning Implementation (November 14, 1995) determined
there were no significant adverse environmental impacts.
7. The proposed Comp Plan Amendments CPA 02-01 are in the public interest and will
improve the Plan as a planning tool for facilitating the desired urban design of the City and
encourage growth that the community wants to take place in the next five years.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Philpott and passed 5 - O.
The Commission took a break at 9:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:05 p.m.
CONTINUED BUSINESS:
PROPOSED MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENTS - MCA 01-02 - CITY OF
PORT ANGELES. City-Wide: Suggested changes to the City's sign, parking,
environmental, subdivision, and zoning regulations (Titles 14-17). The changes were
largely recommended by the Citizens Code Advisory Committee appointed by the
City Council in 2001. (Continued discussion from April 24, 2002.)
The Commission began continued review of proposed Municipal Code amendments with discussion
on the proposed sign amendments as Commissioner Porter needed to leave the meeting and wished
to discuss sign amendments prior to his departure.
Commissioner Porter stated an objection to the limitation of 32" in area for political signs in
residential areas as noted in Section 14.36.050(6) Prohibited Signs. In response to Chair Schramm,
Director Collins noted that, in researching the issue, staffbeIieves state regulations allow political
signs to be reasonably limited. The language that exists is what was decided some time ago to be
reasonable. It is not new language. Commissioner Hewins noted that the proposed changes are for
commercial zones and not for residential zones of the City. The Commission was polled and agreed
to revise the wording such that it reads "Temporary political signs and sign displtzys in "fFindcy",.s (}f
party p(}liticat headqtial le7s, provided they such signs are not located in Dubie rights-of-wav and
are removed within (14) days after the election.. And fm the7 p7 0 vided ',~hen plt'i.ced in 7 esidential
zones stich signs do 7Wt exceed thi7 t}-tHO (32) inches in height and fvtir (4) fut in width.
The Commission agreed that some size limitation may be appropriate in residential zones, but that
is not under consideration at this time. Mr. Collins noted that Section 17.95 of the Zoning Code
addresses political signs.
Regarding Section 14.36.080(C) Prohibited Signs, Commissioner Hewins asked if a section
repealing previous sign requirements would be included in the proposed amending ordinance.
Director Collins responded in the affirmative.
258
Plannzng CommISSIOn MlI1utes
May 22, 2002
Page J 2
Commissioner Schramm stated that, after considerable discussion, the Planning Commission had .
earlier agreed to remove pennants, flags, flyers, ribbons, balloons, or other fluttering devices or
strings of such devices..." from prohibited signs as described in Section 14.36.050(6) but it still
appears to be a recommendation. Director Collins responded that he incorporated what he believed
to be the intent of the Commission which was to allow fluttering devices in the Commercial Arterial
Zone but not in other areas. Commissioner Hewins pointed out that staffs recommendation will be
different than that ofthe Planning Commission. The proposed language is staffs recommendation,
not the Planning Commission's polled vote.
Commissioner Rasmussen did not have a problem with staff's proposed wording of Section
14.36.050(6). Commissioner Schramm stated that it seems like an attempt is being made to create
a sterile business environment where strict rules prohibit a variety of items outside the window.
Although he agrees that standards need to be set, the logic that fluttering devices, balloons, flags, or
flyers create more of a hazard than other devices such as moving signs is not believable. Windsocks
or assorted balloons, placed for short periods of time to advertise a particular item are not safety
issues. He stressed prohibiting only those items that make sense and/or pose a safety concern.
Commissioner Philpott saw no reason why a 35' Ronald McDonald replica for a short period oftime
advertising McDonalds Restaurant is a problem.
Commissioner Philpott favored A-frame signs in the Downtown but wanted to ensure that they
would not pose a safety concern for pedestrians. Director Collins pointed out that language had been
added allowing A-frame signs such that they could be placed in rights-of-way with a Right-of- Way .
Use Permit and naming the City as an additional insured on the owners' insurance policies.
Commissioner Rasmussen agreed but asked that the wording be expanded to include not just the
Downtown but all areas of the City where there are zero setbacks.
Commissioner Hewins pointed out that such language could result in an administrative enforcement
problem that will require staff to check each A-frame sign to see if a permit and a hold harmless
agreement have been filed if the sign is in the right-of-way. It was generally agreed that standards
should be applied consistently throughout the City and not be more lenient in one area of the City
than in others. No impediments, particularly signs, should be placed in the rights-of-way.
Commissioner Philpott moved to recommend that an item "K" be added to Section 14.36.080
Permitted Signs to read:
K. A-Frame Signs. One A-frame sign that is no larger than six (6) square feet per side and
no higher than thirty (30) inches from ground level shall be permitted per site as a
freestanding sign provided that such sign shall be securely anchored to the ground to prevent
overturning due to wind or being moved to an unpermitted location. A-frame signs shall not
be located in public rights-of-way except when a building is built to the front lot line and
provided that the sign owner obtains a Right-of-Way Use Permit and names the City as an
insured on the sign owner's insurance policy indemnifying the City.
.
Commissioner Rasmussen seconded the motion which passed 4 - 1 with Commissioner Hewins
voting in the negative for reasons previously stated.
259
.
.
.
Plannmg CommiSSIOn Mmutes
May 22. 2002
Page /3
After reviewing each ofthe remaining attachments (C, D and E), with discussion and typographical
corrections being noted, Commissioner Porter moved to recommend approval of the proposed
amendments to the Port Angeles Municipal Code as modified by the Commission through
these proceedings. Commissioner Philpott seconded the motion which passed 3 - 2 with
Commissioners Hewins and Schramm voting in the negative. Commissioner Hewins voted
against the motion because he is opposed to some recommendations in the amended sign code. He
did not believe there had been enough public participation to amend the sign regulations City wide.
Changes to 14.40.050 (Parking Space Requirements - Public and Institutional Uses) is too lenient
and not specific enough versus private uses. Commissioner Schramm concurred with Commissioner
Hewins' issues but was mainly not ready to forward the amendments to the City Council at this time.
He would have been more comfortable seeing the changes once more prior to forwarding them for
action.
COl\1MUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None.
STAFF REPORTS
Director Collins encouraged Commissioners who are opposed to the Municipal Code Amendments
to list their specific suggestions so they can be shared with the City Council. The Ennis Creek
Estates Subdivision was continued by the City Council to its June 17,2002, special meeting and
would not be an item at the June 12,2002, Planning Commission meeting.
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
Commissioner Philpott indicated that he would be out of town during the month of September and
October, 2002, and not available for meetings.
Commissioner Hewins indicated that he would not be available for one of the meetings in July.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m.
Brad Collins, Secretary
Chuck Schramm, Chair
PREPARED BY: S. Roberds
260
.
.
.
261
.
.
.
~' IO'RT:~NrG' IE: ILl EIS
I ," ,i ~f ,'1 " I' Ii, i
I ~J' 7, " , l
lIP" , ,'~, I, !
I r
" ,
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DA TE:
May 21,2002
To:
Mayor Wiggins and City Council Members
FROM:
Sue Roberds, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:
Department of Community Development
Planning Division May, 2002 - Monthly Report
CURRENT PLANNING ApPLICATIONS: CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE 2001 YTD
Rezone 1 5 (Began YTD 9/01)
MunicIpal Code Amendment 0 0
Conditional Use Permit 2 5
CondItional Use Permit ExtenSIOn 0 2
Annexation 2 2
Subdivision 0 1
Short Plat 1 5
Appeal of Short Subdivision DecIsion 1 2
Boundary Line Adjustment 2 4
Home Occupation Permit 0 0
RetaIl Stand Permit 0 1
Bed and Breakfast PermIt 0 1
Variance 1 2
Minor Deviation 0 0
Street Vacation 1 1
Parking Variance 0 0
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 0 2
Shoreline ExemptIOn 0 1
Wetland Permit 0 0
Environmentally Sens. Areas 2 8
SEP A ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY:
Determinations of Non SIgnificance 6 15
Mitigated DeterminatIons of Non SIgnificance 0 0
Determinations of Significance 0 0
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ApPLICATIONS:
Building Permit 10 37
Code Enforcement 1 1
Clearing and Gradmg Permit 1 ..Q
262 101
EN!I;~;(:)E!fCOMMUN
h t~I~Ii(~;I:<V~,;~W;~"1 t:i.1\,,'tt,11\"",~
, .1~1.~tQ~J:MQt:!I&JiJ
EMEL::0BMEN'
"~"'iI <tf:""'A' ..~4"~~'\"''''~1>>','<'~'
~R"'ljr,~'i;eQ~
CA TEGORY JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC 2002 YTD 2001 YTD
RESIDENTIAL-NEW
MODULAR / MOBILE 1 2 3 3
.. .. . .. .. . .. .. .... .. '$31,550 . . .. .. ..
Value $91,840 $123,390 $145,642
SINGLE FAMILY 1 2 4 3 3 13 7
. .. ... $ "40,079 .. . $217,135 $518.399 .. $389,697 .. ." .. .. . .
Value $209,099 $1,474,409 $835,791
MUL TI.FAMIL Y
. ... .... ... ... . ...... ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .".. ....
Value
ACCESSORIES 1 5 1 7 11
.. .. ... $20,000 . .. .. .. 70,600
Value $7,000 $45,076 72,076
COMMERCIAL-NEW
RETAIL 1 - 1
.. . . ." ....... .. ...... .. $80,000" .. . ... .. . . ... .. .. $80,000 .. ..
Value
HOTEL/MOTEL .. ..
........ .. . . .. .. .,. .. ..
Value
OFFICE 1 1 1
.. ... .. .. . $250,000 . .. $250,000 .... $200,000
Value
DRINKING/DINING .. .. .................... .....
... ...........
Value
AUTDISERVICE
. . .. . .. .. .. . .
Value
INDUSTRIAL
Value .. .. .... . . ,
~ IPUBlIC - NEW
CHOOLS/HOSPITALS 1 1
.... .. $20,000 .. ... $20,000 ...... ... c ..
Value
I-I CHURCHES 1 1
II . " Value . . $12,000 .. .. $12,000 ...
~ RECREA TION 1
,.. . . .
Value $77,000
REPAIR & ALT.
RESIDENTIAL 37 26 47 44 46 200 174
. .. . Value' .. .. .. $1,039,227 ..
$130,625 $85,035 $236,937 $239,418 $347,211 $808,158
COMMERCIAL 11 8 10 11 12 52 44
... ... ... . .. ... .. $887,555 . ....
Value $54,941 $16.720 $52,687 $ 105,557 $657,650 $444,994
PUBLIC 1 4 2 2 2 11 5
.., ... $116.500 $5,500 ... .. .... $426,802 .. $1,168,575
Value $250,000 $9,442 $45,360
DEMOLITION I MOVE 1 1 1 3 6
... ........ . ..................... .. ....... ........ "...nn _n_.. .. .. $2,500 .. ,.. . $3,000
Value $500 $500 $1,500
BUILDING TOTALS
SLOG PERMITS 54 42 63 68 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 293 252
....... CONST. 'VALUE . . .. .. .... .... ... ... ... ......... ...... .. ........ .. ....... ......... ...... .. .. .... . .
$615,145 $~!8:83~. .. ..~.~~4,523 $77!,990 ... ~~.'~~~:~~~...... $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ~~... $0 $4,387,959 $3,753,760
.. . .. .. .. .... ... .. ...
SLOG PERMITS FEE $8.375 $9.264 $15,123 $14,913 $22,530 $70,205 $56,255
OTHER PERMITS
R .!. W CONSTR 7 3 3 6 13 32 32
..... .. . .. .... .. ... $135 .. .. $t.255 .. . . . ...... . . ... .. -. .. .. ..... $3,335 ... ...... $'3,180
Revenue $1,155 $320 $470
NEW WATER SERV 5 2 2 5 13 27 21
. ....... ....Reven~e . .. .. .. $3,790 .. .. . . $1.665' .. .. s't2,210 ...... .. . ... .... . .. $21,935 .. . $15,805
$1,280 $2,990
NEW SEWER SERV 6 1 2 4 14 27 27
. .. . . '$45 .. . .. .. . ... .. .. ... ..... $10,265 ... $9,920
Revenue $1,820 $840 $1,680 $5,880
NO OTHER PERMITS 18 6 7 15 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 80
..........OTHER PERMIT REV:"'" . ......... ...... ..... . . $2,640'" .... ... $5,140 ..... ....... .............$0.. . ..... $0 ....... .......... $0 ... $0 ....... ......... $0 .... -... so ........ .. ............ $0 ..... .... $35,535 ... $28,905 .. .
$6,765 $1,645 $19,345
..
ApplIed 67
Issued 65
eomPlete
.
.
.
.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITY DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT
MAY 2002
WATER DEMAND
RAINFALL
>-
<(
c
en
z
o
..J(f)
..Jz
<( g ,
Cl...J
w~
Cl
<(
0::
W
>
<(
..J
..J<J)
<w
lLJ:
Z U
~;;
AUG
OCT
DEe
...
JAN
...
SEP
NOV
.AY
JUl.
FES
AUG
OCT
02001 _ 2002 - 10 Year Average
DEe
... JUN
02001 .2002
AVERAGE DAILY WATER DEMAND
RAINFALL DATA (lOeheo)
AVERAGE ELECTRICAL USE
1QYRAVG TOTAt. lODATE
1131
LAST YEAR TO DATE (M Kvwh)
THIS YEAR TO DATE 1M Kwh)
.._
56 7131
LAST YEAR TO DATE (MG)
THIS YEAR TO DATE (MG)
THIS VR TO DATE
2fT.
RECORD HIGH THIS MONTH 345
RECORD lOW THIS MONTH
00'
SEWER/STORM SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
MOHTH 1FT)
YO.
TEMPERATURE
SEWER SYSTEM JETTED
8968 27184
-- -
~ -f-- - - -
f-- - -
~ - ':..a..
f-- - - I-- - -..,..
..- f-- - - I-- - t- t--
f-- - - t- - f-- -
I-- - - r- - I-- -
I-- '-- l- I-- r- I-- -
I-- I-- I-- I-- r- I-- -
I-- I-- l- I-- I-- I-- -
I-- I-- l- I-- r- I-- -
I-- I-- l- I-- r- f-- -
'- '-
STORM DRAINS JETTED
SYSTEM TV INSPECTED
670
2136
I TOTAL LANDFILL DISPOSAL I
W
II::
~ ~.
< ~
a:: ~ ..
~~
:E
w
I-
0200'.2002 --10YearAverage
ELECTRICAL USAGE
w
Cl
<
~ I'M
..J ~ .
~ ~ JO
0:'"
t; ~~
W
..J
W
LANDFILL ANNUAL TONS
THIS VR TO DATE (TONS)
lAST VR TO DATE (TONS)
...
IE'
NOY
DEe
D 2001 . 2002
264
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITY DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT
MAY 2002
WATER
Removed 2 water services
Renewed 2 water services
Repaired 8 water servIce leaks
Installed seven water services
Repaired 1 tvvo Inch water main break
Renewt'M> Inch water mam on S side of W16th, 1200 Block
Installed 1 new fire hydrant on Ahlvers Road
Completed Installation of new surge tank at Et'Nha pump station
Continue With Elwha Flltratton Pilot Study
WASTEWATER COLLECTION
AssIsted With records dIsposal at City Hall
Adjusted elevation of manholes on Ahlvers Road
Used Vactor truck to excavate gravel and repaIr leaks at WWTP
Anended WWCPA annual conference In Ocean Shores
Adjusted sewer manholes In new development on Fountain Street
I WASTEWATER TREATMENT
NPDES monthly report showed no violations
Worked With local dischargers on pretreatment Issues
Cleaned mechanical area of compost facllrty and tested eqUIpment
Replaced leaking underground hydronlc pipe at the dewatenng bUIlding
Installed new belts on bett press
Replced the auger beanng on the gnt removal system
EQUIPMENT SERVICES
Work Orders 162
Service Orders 25
#0019 1926 Fire Truck Install new fuel hnes & tank muffler and hangers
#0053 2002 Pohce Sedan new In servIce radIO and electronic gear
#1054 2002 Pohce Sedan, new IS service, radIO and electronic gear
#0129 2002 Light Utility Pickup radio and electroniC gear
#1506 2001 Street Mower replaced cutter teeth controls, new seat
#1890 Toro Mower, new Ignition sWitch, dnve linkage, pump parts
#1905 Packer, Install radIator, dnve hne, new pump
#1911 Packer new hydraulic pump, replace grease hnes
#1916 10 Yd Dump, replace belts, dnve beanng etc
#1920 Packer, new strobe and dump S'Nltch, new coordInator board
I LIGHT OPERATIONS
Tested 147 meters
Changed out 51 meters
RepaIred Morse Creek flow meter and hne
Repaired damaged buss at MFM Street Substation
~ pOtiT..~
~c~"
~~
.. 'E!:~
~~I
<"'~r
~ Ai'"
.
SOLID WASTE
RECYCLING
Recychng at FestIval of Arts
Recycled old City Hall records for Clerk
Regional SW meetlng at Jamestown
COLLECTIONS
Total 90s placed for conversion 2035
Requests for recyllng services In conversion area 327
SpeCial collectIons due to conversion 18
SpeCial Collections 92
STREET
AlC repair utility cuts at compost facIlity
Raise Manhole Lids on Ahlvers
Repair damaged cross walk pavers
Cut out weep holes on 8th Street Bndges
Reshape 213 Alley East of Penn Street drainage
Install culvert and Junction box at Bent Cedars Way
Install fenCIng at Black Ball T enmnal
Apply centerhne buttons, plastiCS downtown
BUilding maintenance at Fine Arts Center
Budd cabinets for IS
ASSIst Parks With YoOrk at Pool
Started yearly weed abatement program
Monthly Safety meeting
T.2 TralOlng
I ENGINEERING
FranCIS Street Park constructIon support
Crown Park deSIgn support
CirCUit SWltcher deSIgn contract support
Elwha Dam removal mitigation support
I & I Pilot Program support
Gateway Project deSIgn support
High Zone ReservOIr support
Laurel Street Slide Repair support
SCADA Phase II support
Waterfront TraIl Rayonler to Lee's Creek deSign support
Signal deSign 5th and Race
Centennial Trail through Rayonler Mill site deSigned
Black Diamond ReservOIr Cover construction support
Camegle Library deSIgn support
Stormwater Management support
Ranney Well SurgeTank replacement completed
Del GUZZI subdIVISIon support
Fire Hall roof repair support
Front Street Sidewalk deSIgn
Laundsen Blvd Sidewalk deSign
Mr' Street SIdewalk deSign
_ Warehouse Mezzamne contract support
2002 Electnc DeSign Contract support
Peabody ReservOir Cover project advertised
Pump StaMn #2, 5 & 6 deSIgn support
.
.
265
.
.
.
Port Angeles
Fire Department
It is the purpose of the Port Angeles Fire Department to
improve the quality of life for the citizens and visitors of the
City while providing a broad range of services designed to
save lives and property.
May
Monthly Report
266
P AFD Monthly Report for May 2002
.
Operations 2000 2001 2002 % increase
or decrease
over
preVIOUS
year
Total number of calls to date 1,153 1,253 1,376 8.9 1
Total Medic I patient contacts to date 968 949 966 1.7 1
Total number of volunteer firefighters N/A 759 509 32.9 1
hours of service to date
Average daily responses per crew this 7.7 7.5 10.2 26.4 T
month
Operations
.
The Department was very involved in the response to an oil spill that occurred in the Port
Angeles inner harbor on May 19. Dan McKeen served as incident commander representing
the City at Unified Command. Captain Jamie Mason served as overall Safety Officer for the
operation. This was a protracted operation that lasted several days.
.
Prevention 2001 2002
Fire and life safety inspections to date 496 457
PermitsIPlan reviews to date 24 39
Number of fire investigations performed to date 10 7
Number of public education contacts to date 282 1,396
Prevention
· During the week of May 6 - 10, the entire Department was involved in the 68th annual Sparky
Week. Firefighters used Engine 5 50 pick up 16 different second grade classes from five
local schools and deliver them tot he fire station for a fun, informative presentation on fire
safety and firefighter. 254 students participated.
.
In collaboration with the Clallam County Department of Emergency Management, we
presented a disaster preparedness overview for 25 senior management and staff personnel at
Daishowa America.
.
· We proved fire extinguisher training for over 50 employees at a local assisted living facility
and major motel.
267
.
.
.
Training 2001 2002
Career personnel: Total number of training hours to date 1,067 1,065
(21 career firefighters)
Volunteer personnel: Total number oftraining hours to date 424 522.5
(22 volunteer firefighters)
Number of citizens trained in CPR to date 131 112
Number of citizens trained in first aid to date N/A 108
Number of citizens trained in disaster preparedness N/A 25
Training
.
The Fire Department will be working closely with the Clallam County Department of
Emergency Management to assist with conducting a regional terrorism training exercise to
be held at Dry Creek Elementary School in August. The Port Angeles Police and Fire
Departments will be taking on active support roles in the exercise, which will also test the
new Clallam County Information Management program.
Department News
Firefighter/Paramedic Dave Chastain had an interesting call this month. He delivered a health baby
boy in the back of Medic 1O! The parents honored the occasion by naming the child after Dave!
Dan McKeen and Ken Dubuc spent the better part of a day brainstorming for long range planning
issues. This was a highly productive day that will be followed up with more planning sessions.
An evening presentation of all our support officers and their wives was made on the 28th. This
presentation was an overview of the support officer program and focused on the role the support
officers play in our emergency response - as well as the vital role that families have as an informal
support structure for the supp'ort officers.
268
.
.
.
269
.
THe CITY QF
~t , . BTltN6'IEILi:S
' ,!' '; "', ',' y hr ~ ~ %:: "
{ ~f" ,_ Y ~ d . i^
\, . ' '': ",l\~ ,:" wi /: \" " : , : ,,,:j ~ ,~,,:!,' ,;'",7
- ' .;- \
t~. .-/:#>'~ ,,<-;} >
}?<illi(: i D~<f~aJtm~Jil1t
.
~4AA4AA.AAAAAAAAAAA.AAAA4.AAA.AAA~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~VVVTTVVVYVYVVVVYVVVVVVVTVVVVVVVV~
Port Angeles Police Department
October 1977
2~O
. " It
r ' [i ,J n
~"i ~~tJ' ~t; ~Ol t2'
~J 4(, J:i;
I "J ~-- , j
thlJ { Rl ~
\;f '> /~~~~~1 t"'v, \ ~
1\71; ,i $>,n6@; : '~y " QP' '(!}1'J?,t.
I i ~\ll<{ y" l 1 M 't \~,.., 4 ll';~ I
~","", ow o;J ~:..J< _ .. < ..... ,,"..r, ~ ~ A ~
j
.
270
.
Mission Statement:
In partnership with our community, the Port Angeles Police
Department recognizes its mission to serve in a compassionate,
courteous, and professional manner, to promote freedom and peace of
mind, pride in our neighborhoods, and the safety of our families.
~
Later the same day, at approximately 11: 10
p.m., police were summoned to a house in
the 800 block of East First St. The resident
there reported he had just been robbed by
three men who fled in a red, Pontiac
Sunbird. The victim told police he was just
going to bed when several people began
beating on his doors and windows. When he
opened his door to investigate, two of the
men forced their way into the house. One of
the men unplugged the victim's 27"
Magnavox T.V. and took it out to a car
waiting in the alley while the other
demanded the victim's wallet, threatening
violence if the victim did not cooperate. The
victim reluctantly gave up his wallet, which
held approximately $90.00. The men then
exited the house, entered the waiting red
Sunbird, and drove off. Officers began
looking for the suspects' vehicle and about
45 minutes after the crime occurred Officer
Tom Bergeron spotted a vehicle matching
the description provided by the victim.
Officers stopped the vehicle and one of the
passengers fled into the darkness. The other
two were detained. The victim was brought
to the scene where he identified one of the
remaining men as one who had entered the
house and taken his T.V.. Police quickly
ascertained that the second man had been
waiting in the alley and was driving the get
away car. A 21-year-old male, the driver,
was arrested for burglary. The other male,
also 21 years of age, was arrested for
burglary and theft. Both men reside in Port
Angeles. After questioning the suspects
officers obtained a search warrant for a
residence in the 800 block of South Eunice.
Executing the warrant, police recovered the
. On 05/06/2002, at approximately 2:35 in
the afternoon, officers of the Port Angeles
Police Department responded to Capital
Advance, 802 E. 1 sl Street, on a report that a
young man was trying to cash a stolen check.
The document he was trying to cash had been
inside a 1997 Ford pickup truck which was
reported stolen from the west end. The stolen
vehicle report also noted several guns were in
the truck when it was stolen. Due to the high
likelyhood of weapons being present,
Officers entered Capital Advance and
immediately placed the 15-year-old Forks
youth into custody. Once secured, police
found the keys to the stolen truck in the
suspects pockets and located the stolen truck
parked several blocks away. Two stolen
rifles were recovered from the truck as well
as six other rifles and two Samurai swords.
'Y
On the same date, at 2: 15 p.m. police were
summoned to Swains General Store on a
report of a shoplifter in custody. Employees
at Swains had observed the man remove
items from his old duffle bag and place them
into a new bag. The suspect then walked out
of the store without paying for the item. The
suspect, a 24-year-old male, claimed he had
purchased the bag but had no receipts to
prove his claim. When he was searched
incident to his arrest, a small baggy
containing a white powdery substance was
found in his pants pocket. The powder field
tested positive for methamphetamine. The
suspect claimed the drugs were not his. . In
fact he stated that the pants he was weanng
weren't his either.
271
.
.
1
.
stolen T.V. and discovered the third suspect who had
fled earlier when their car was stopped. A 22-year-
old was taken into custody and booked on charges of
burglary and robbery. The resident at the address on
Eunice Street, a 23-year-old male, was cited for
possession of stolen property. In addition to
recovering the T.V. police located the victim's stolen
wallet, minus the $90.00. The case has been referred
to the prosecutor's office.
.
On 05/15/2002, at approximately 12:00 noon,
Detective Jesse Winfield was waiting for his lunch at
a local restaurant when he observed what appeared to
be an illicit drug transaction in the parking lot. Upon
investigating, Detective Winfield contacted a 24-
year-old male and recovered approximately three
grams of "Tar" heroin. Patrol Officers, who
responded to assist, discovered approximately
$150.00 alleged to have been used to purchase the
heroin. The cash was found stuffed between the
seats of a van being operated by a 30-year-old
female. Officers also found a package of a white
crystalline powder which field tested positive for
methamphetamine. Vehicles of both subjects were
seized and transported to the Port Angeles Police
Station. Police conducted thorough searches of the
vehicles after applying for the necessary warrants.
The male was booked into the Clallam County
Corrections Facility and charged with possession of
heroin. The female was booked on charges of
possession of methamphetamine and delivery of
heroin. Both cases are being review by the
Prosecutor.
.
II!IIVI ~01l(1 0'''(11 ~IOeIAM
After four years without Reserve Police
Officers Chief Tom Riepe says it is time to
resurrect the volunteer force. "It will be good
for the community and good for the Police
Department." Tom said. Chief Riepe
believes in "community policing" and the
candidates for the reserve program will have
to be problem solvers, like people and be
dedicated to the professional delivery of
police services to our citizens.
The interest of regular officers to restart the
program has inspired the department to make
this new effort for volunteer reserves. The
officers involved in the program are Cpt.
Kevin Miller, Officer Allen Brusseau and
Officer Glenn Wood. Fifteen applications
were accepted and the officers involved in the
program will be conducting background
checks and interviews in the next few weeks.
Chief Riepe estimates the reserve program
will begin with seven to ten officers.
Some applicants may be interested in
pursuing a law enforcement career, and ,if
chosen as a reserve officer, they would have
an opportunity to get a greater glimpse of a
career in the criminal justice field.
Port Angeles Police Department, Port
Townsend Police Department, LaPush Police
Department, Sequim Police Department,
Lower Elwha Police Department, Forks
Police Department and Neah Bay Police
Department are all committed to working in
partnership with Peninsula College to
establish an annual regionalized Washington
State Certified Reserve Police Officer (RPO)
Program.
Applicants to the program will undergo
2 written, oral, and psychological testing
2 7 ~milar to that given to regular officers.
Police Department Training 2002
May 2002 Training
tOn May 2, 2002, Cpl. Tyler Peninger
received certification as a Firearms-Rifle
Instructor after completing the required forty
hour Washington State Criminal Justice
Training Commission class.
[+)
tOn May 3, 2002, Officer Gerald Swayze
completed 16 hours of instruction through
theWashington State Criminal Justice Train-
ing Commission for certification as OC Spray
DefensiveTactics Instructor.
On May 29 Officer Swayze instructed a three
hour defensive tactics training session with
the assistance of Sgt. Baertschiger and Cpl.
Miller. Issues covered were the use of force,
officer killed summaries, ground fighting es-
capes, level 2 techniques and O. C. Spray.
Officer Viada instructed the Taser re-
certification class. Officers who received re-
certification were Sgts. Coyle and Kovatch;
Cpls. Peninger, Miller, Lowell and Schilke;
Officers Vi ada, Ensor, Bergeron, Dom-
browski, King, Raymond, Wood, Kuch,
Knight, Scairpon, Silva, Roggenbuck and
Winfield.
[+)
+Detective Sgt. Erick Zappey attended the
40 hour F.B.I. Crime Scene Management
training held in Seattle May 20 through
May 24, 2002 and sponsored by the
Washington State Criminal Justice
Commission.
[+)
+Chief of Police Tom Riepe attended the
Spring Conference of the Washington
Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs
which was held in Wenatchee May 20,2002
through May 23, 2002.
[+)
.
Police Volunteers
.
The Port Angeles Police Volunteers
pictured above are:
Bill Foley Leona McCallister, Gary Marler
Louis Lawson
Leland Lee
Dorothy Phillips
Gwen Porterfield Lee Porterfield
Ray Wilson
Gale Turton is the Volunteer Coordinator
Volunteers do:
Vacation home checks
Radar/speed watches
Assist in the office
Downtown foot patrol
And are an important segment of Port Angeles events
such as Arts in Action, The Big Hurt, City Pier Concerts,
Clallam County Fair and Parades.
.
3 In the month of May Police Volunteers
worked a total of 101 hours.
273
.
.
.
Attendees:
LAW ENFORCEMENT ADVISORY BOARD
Leland Lee, Chairman
Rod Anderson
Leonard Beil
David Brewer
Jim Jones
Dennis Wilcox
Chief Tom Riepe
Lena Washke, Secretary
Guests: Sgt. Eric Kovatch
Bill Lowman, W ASPC EMP Case Manager
~
Call to Order: Leland Lee called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm.
Minutes: The minutes from April 24, 2002 were approved as published
Communications and Letters: There were no communications or letters.
Committee Reports: There were no committee reports.
Agenda Items
1. Guest - Sgt Eric Kovatch
Sgt. Eric Kovatch was available at the meeting to answer any questions from the Board. He updated the Board on recent ac-
tivities. A Coast Guard employee will be riding along tonight and another has been scheduled for a ride along. Officers
have been working traffic on Ediz Hook due to the oil spill. The airport security patrols have been going fine and scheduling
has not been a problem. Sgt. Kovatch also inquired about the suggestion that the Coast Guard be invited to the Board meet-
ings. Chief Riepe will work on this for the next meeting.
2. Guest - Bill Lowman
Bill Lowman is the North Sound Electronic Monitoring Program Case Manager for the Washington Association of Sheriffs
& Police Chiefs (W ASPC). He discussed at length the Home Monitoring Program and the alternatives it provides to jail
time. The Police Department uses this program whenever possible to save on jail costs.
3. Animal Control
The draft of the new animal control ordinance has been completed. Chief Riepe, City Attorney Dennis Dickson and Dennis
Wilcox need to go over the revised version for additional changes. Recently a new regulation was passed regarding danger-
ous dogs, which will need to be included in the new ordinance. Upon completion of this process, the Department will begin
working on an alarm ordinance.
4. Racism Concerns
There was discussion regarding Chief Riepe's correspondence to the City Council regarding the racism concerns. The De-
partment has been working with the Coast Guard scheduling ride alongs with patrol officers and attending work session
meetings.
5. Personnel Updates
Chief Riepe discussed the 1/10 of 1 % Criminal Justice Sales Tax that the County is considering for the November ballot.
Part ofthis tax would benefit the City General Fund and could be used to offset the rising jail costs.
6. Items from Members
There was discussion regarding the vacated student position. The Department is recruiting for another student, possibly a
female Choice School student.
4
274
.
PAPD CFS
(Calls for Service)
DISPATCHES FOR PAPD
COUNTYWIDE 911 CALLS
1721
1606
I 0 Month 1120021
10 Month 1120021
10 Month 1120021
.
2002 ARRESTS
437
126
19
90 Clw
C]....:;~:..',*,
~ ',"~ '-,,"
. ,
Juvenile
Arrests for
month
J 'I Adult
uvenl e
A t f Arrests for
rres s or y
Y ear
ear
.
5
275
10
4 4 5
5 I. I .1.
0
Expired Fail to Follow Too Negligent All Other
. Veh Stop - Close Driving
License Signal
.
TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS
For The Month
25
23
23
20
14
15
2002 TRAFFIC COLLISIONS
600
500
400
300
200
100
o
184
I ClAccidents for the Month _Accidents for the Year I
.
6
276
15
PART 1 CRIMES
.
Offense Current rronth Current I'vbnthl2001 Total for Year
Homade 0 0 0
Rape/Sex Offenses 1 0 2
Robberv-A11 1 1 3
Assault-Felony 4 3 18
Assault4th 29 26 94
Burolarv-Residential 6 8 36
Burqlarv-Other 5 1 22
Theft-Shooliftina 6 6 37
Theft-from Vehide 14 21 81
Theft-from Bldq 8 9 57
Theft-Vehide 1 0 19
Theft-Other 18 13 62
Arson-All 0 0 1
Total 93 88 423
PART 2 CRIMES
.
Offense Current Month Current Month/2001 Total for Year
Resisting/Obstructing 0 1 13
Stalking/Harassment/Endangerment 5 5 23
UI BClFraud/Embezzle/Property 4 3 35
Malicious Mischief-Felony 3 4 25
Malicious Mischief-3rd 9 14 52
Weapons Violations 0 4 17
Crimes Against Child/Sex Offense 4 4 16
Drug Violation 9 18 43
Domestic - Verbal 0 4 11
DUI 5 15 38
Alcohol Violations 5 8 34
Violate Protection Order 1 8 19
Runaway 13 7 55
Miscellaneous/Other 9 10 36
Total 67 105 417
.
7
277
.
ANIMAL CONTROL INCIDENTS
For the Current Month
Totaling 143 Calls
28
8
10
12
17
5
52
57
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ )> )> ~ ~
::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l
3' 3' 3' 3 3' 3' 3' 3' 3'
!!!.. III III !i!- III III !!!.. !!!.. III
:l> (5 T CS ~ sa <: T
"T1 .2. 0
0- CD 0 0 0 o' 5'
c: III c: c: 3 in iil c)"
III 0- ::l iil '< CD
CD 0- 0- "0 CD c: -..
0- W iii' III
5'
o' Iii
"
.
Parking Ticket Statistics '
Tickets Revenue Tickets Revenue Tickets Revenue
2000 2000 2001 2001 2002 2002
Jan 246 $2,225.00 128 $1,094 269 $1,070
Feb 292 $2,988.00 201 $1,426 271 2,247
Mar 291 $4,611.00 310 $2,010 266 2,697
Apr 219 $2,530.00 298 $2,850 " -
-236
$1,885.00 445 $2,832 ; "
May 167 . '~77. ';' . :'1~6:
y
. .
June 147 $1,850.00 223 $2195 << .
, ",-v l
" -.
July 290 $1,525.00 358 $2,990
Aug 259 $2,310.00 301 $3,390
Sept 130 $1,830.00 250 $2,433
Oct 260 $1,820.00 351 $3,171
Nov 201 $1,911.00 126* $2,265
Dee 84 $1,552.00 47* $1,128
Total 2586 $27,037.00 2991 $26,656 1314 11,105
. * Parking Enforcement Officer on sick leave.
8
278
.
~m County Sheriff's Department - Correcti<A Division
Population Statistics thr~pril 2002
IBoOkings & Release I
I Percentage by Category I
300
250
200
150
100
50
o
Other
6%
Post-Mlsd
24%
Pre-
Felony
37%
Jun
Jul~- Aug Sep
Mar
Post-
Felony
14%
Oct
Nav
Dee
Jan
Feb
Apr
May
. Bookings
I!I Releas~~
I Male/Female Comparison I
160
140
120
100 -
Capacity 80
96 60
40
20
0
Jun
123-.9
-OS.8---~1~
Jul
Sep
May
Oct
Aug
Nav
Dee
Feb
Jan
Mar
Apr
I8rota, ADP
Ii! Male
. Female
kr
Total ADP -12 months
118.18
5/02
,
, ,
.
.
.
163