HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 07/20/2004 AGENDA
~'~ ~--I~OR~/ANGELE$_. CITY COUNCIL MEETING
W A S H I N G T O N, U.S.a. 321 EAST FIFTH STREET
July 20, 2004
REGULAR MEETING - 6:00 p.m.
A. CALL TO ORDER - Regular Meeting (6:00 p.m.)
ROLL CALL -
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -
puBLIC CEREMONIES, PRESENTATIONS
AND PROCLAMATIONS
1. Introduction and Badge Presentation: New - Mayor & Police Officer Present Badge
Police Officer/Law Enforcement Academy & Introduce Officer Dan Morse
Graduate, Dan Morse
2. Proclamation recognizing Recreation and I Read Proclamation
Parks Month - July 2004
B. WORK SESSION
C. LATE ITEMS.TO BE PLACED ON THIS OR FUTURE AGENDAS (By Council, Staffor Public) AND
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA (This is.the opportunity for members of the
public to speak to the City Council about anything not on the agenda, please keep comments to S- l O minutes.)
D. FINANCE
1. Equipment Purchase: Refuse Collection 3 Award Contract
Truck
E. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City Council Minutes of July 6, 2004 Approve Consent Agenda
2. Expenditure Approval List - July 9, 2004 - 19 .
$884,024.99 _ 35 177
3. Electronic Payments July 9, 2004 -
$1,604,793.48
4.Wholesale Water Contract with Public Utility
District
5.Household Hazardous Waste Collection
Event scheduled for September 24, 2004
F. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
July 20, 2004 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - 1
G. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS
1. Adoption of 2003 State Building/Fire Codes Adopt Ordinance
2. Adjustment of Industrial Electric Basic Adopt Ordinance
Monthly Charge
H. RESOLUTIONS
I. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
1. Development Agreement: Green Crow Authorize Mayor to Sign Agreement
Campbe!l Avenue Subdivision and proposed
Planned Residential Development
2. Solid Waste Export and Transfer Station Approve Agreements
Systems Interlocal Agreements
J. PUBLIC HEARINGS - QUASI-JUDICIAL
(7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter)
K. PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER
(7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter)
L. INFORMATION
1. City Manager's Reports:
· Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Update (Page 131)
· Peninsula International Relations Association 2004 First Half Report (Page 133)
2.Public Works & Utilities Quarterly Report (Page 135)
3.Department of Community Development Monthly Reports - June 2004 (Page 139)
4.Planning Commission Minutes - June 23, 2004 (Page 141)
M. EXECUTIVE SESSION (As needed and determined by City Attorney)
N. ADJOURNMENT I [
G:'~CNCLPKTxAGENDA~July 20 '04 ag¢.wpd
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings are set by the City Council in order to meet legal requirements pertaining to matters such as, land use permit applications, proposed
amendments to City land use regulations, zoning changes, annexations, in addition, the City Council may set a public headng in order to receive
public input prior to making decisions which impact the citizens. Certain matters may be controversial, and the City Council may choose to seek
public opinion through the public hearing process.
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERM,INE TIME OF BREAK
July 20, 2004 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - 2
pORTA.NGELE$ CITY COUNCIL MEETING
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
July 20, 2004
I. CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING:
II. ROLL CALL:
Members Present:
Mayor Headrick
Councilmember Braun
Councilmember Erickson
Councilmember Munro
Councilmember Pittis
Councilmember Rogers
Councilmember Williams
Staff Present:
Manager Quinn
Attorney Bloor
Clerk Upton
B. Collins
M. Connelly
G. Cutler
D. McKeen
T. Riepe
Y. Ziomkowski
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Led by: 4~4a_0_ ~(~~~t_/_j~_ax4?-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Attendance Roster
DATE OF MEETING: July 20, 2004
LOCATION: City_ Council Chambers
City of Port Angeles
p_ORTANGELES Ordinance/Resolution Distribution List
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
City Council Meeting of July 20, 2004
Resolution No.
City Manager
City Atty' (1)
Planning
Deputy Clerk
Personnel
Cust. Svcs.
Finance
Dir./M~r.
Police Dept.
Fire Dept.
Light Dept.
Parks & Rec.
PDN (Sugary)
Extra Copies
TOTAL
PROCLAMATION
Recreation and Parks Month
WHEREAS, parks, recreation activities and leisure experiences provide opportunities for young
people to live, grow and develop into contributing members of society; and
WHEREAS, parks and recreation create lifelines and enrich life experiences for older members
of our communities; and
WHEREAS, park and recreation agencies provide outlets for physical activities, socialization and
stress reducing experiences; and
WHEREAS, parks, playgrounds, nature trails, open spaces, community, aquatics and cultural
centers, state parks and historic sites make our state an attractive and desirable place
to live, work, play and visit, which contributes to our economic vitality; and
WHEREAS, parks, greenways and open spaces provide a welcome respite from our fast-paced,
high-tech lifestyles while protecting and preserving our natural environment; and
WHEREAS, parks and recreation agencies touch the lives of individuals, families, groups and
entire communities which positively impacts the social, economic, health and
environmental quality of our state;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Richard A. Headrick, Mayor, on behalf of the City Council of Port
Angeles, do hereby proclaim July 2004 as
Recreation and Parks Month
in Port Angeles, and I encourage all citizens to join me in participating and supporting the many
recreational and leisure programs and facilities provided by public and private agencies.
July 20, 2004
Richard A. Headrick, Mayor
2
W A S H I N G T O N, U, $, A,
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: July 20, 2004
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT: EQUIPMENT PURCHASE: REFUSE COLLECTION TRUCK -
Summary: Bids for a new refuse truck were opened June 22, 2004. The City received 8 bids
from 3 different vendors. Equipment Services recommends the purchase of the Peterbilt/LaBrie
Refuse Truck in the amount of $189,028.91 from Western Peterbilt of Seattle, WA.
Recommendation: Reject bids from Western Peterbilt for the Peterbilt/McNeilus and
Peterbilt/Wayne Curbtender as being non-responsible. Award and authorize the City
Manager to sign the contract and purchase order with Western Peterbilt in an amount not
to exceed $190,000.00.
Background/Analysis: The 2004 budget contained funds to purchase a new refuse truck for the
Public Works & Utilities Solid Waste Division. These funds have been transferred to the
Equipment Services funds and are available for the procurement. The existing 1992 Peterbilt is
beyond its economical life and needs to be replaced. The refuse truck is not available through
State bid.
Chassis / Body Bidder Cost including tax
and trade in
Peterbilt/McNeilus Western Peterbilt, Seattle $164,157.40
Peterbilt/Wayne Western Peterbilt, Seattle $179,469.77
Curbtender
Peterbilt/Labrie Western Peterbilt, Seattle $189,028.91
Peterbilt/Hell Western Peterbilt, Seattle $189,134.21
Husky Truck/Wayne Husky Truck Center, $189,860.35
Curbtender Seattle
Husky Truck/Heil Husky Truck Center, $195,657.92
Seattle
Husky Truck/Labrie Husky Truck Center, $196,635.45
Seattle
Freightliner/Heil Valley Fr.~ghtliner, Pacific $202,864.95
N:\CCOUNCILXFINAL\04 refuse truck purchase.doc
July 20, 2004 City Council Meeting
Equipment Purchase: Refuse Collection Truck
Page 2 of 2
Bids were analyzed with the first two bids not meeting specified requirements:
#1 Peterbilt/McNeilus: This vehicle uses a tandem axle to meet weight capacities. The City
requires a single axle truck to accommodate our small residential cul-de-sacs. Non-
responsible.
#2 Peterbilt/Wayne Curbtender: The specifications required an arm reach of 109 inches in
order to accommodate all City lift situations. This vehicle was unacceptable since it could
only reach 96 inches. Additionally, the engine horsepower was not capable of operating the
loading arm at idle. Non-responsible.
The 2004 Equipment Services and Solid Waste budget has $210,000 available for the purchase
of the new vehicle
It is recommended that Council reject bids from Western Peterbilt for the Peterbilt/McNeilus and
Peterbilt/Wayne Curbtender as being non-responsible. Award and authorize the City Manager to
sign the contract and purchase order with Western Peterbilt in an amount not to exceed
$190,000.00.
4
N:\CCOUNCILXFINAL\04 refuse truck purchase.doc
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
July 6, 2004
CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Headrick called the meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order at 6:02
REGULAR MEETING: p.m.
ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mayor Headrick, Councilmembers Braun, Munro, Rogers,
and Williams.
Members Absent: Councilmember Erickson and Pittis.
Staff Present: Manager Quirm, Attorney Bloor, B. Collins, M. Cormelly,
G. Cutler, C. Hagar, D. McKeen, T. Riepe, Y.
Ziomkowski, G. Kenworthy, G. McLain,. S. McLain, T.
McCabe, B. Beverford, T. Smith, M. Puntenney, J. Hebner,
J. Young, S. Roberds, B. Coons.
Public Present: E. Tuttle, B. Henry Sr., R. Sieg, J. A. Hoare, R. Browning,
A. Morley, B. Hoyle, T. Ahlgren, P. Lamoureux, R. Deane,
D. Bickford, C. Kidd, J. Ball, and J. Bourget. All others
present in the audience failed to sign the roster.
PLEDGE OF The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Community Development Director
ALLEGIANCE: Collins·
PUBLIC CEREMONIES, 1. Proclamation in Recognition of Retiring Public Works & Utilities Deputy
PRESENTATIONS AND Director, Ken Ridout
PROCLAMATIONS:
Mayor Headrick read a proclamation recognizing the leadership, management skills,
Recognition of Retiring professionalism, and contributions made by Mr. Ridout during his 25-years of
Public Works & Utilities employment with the City of Port Angeles. Director of Public Works Cutler then
Deputy Director, Ken presented Mr. Ridout with a plaque with a clock in recognition of his service to the
Ridout City.
Mr. Ridout shook hands with each of the Council and staff members present, thanking
each one.
Director Cutler then introduced Mike Puntenney, who was hired recently to fill Mr.
Ridout's position.
Presentation of "Spotlight 2. Presentation: Washington Recreation and Parks Association "Spotlight Facility
Facility Award of Award of Excellence" for Valley C/eek Estuary Park
Excellence" for Valley
Creek Estuary Park Director of Parks and Recreation Connelly asked those who worked so hard to
complete this project to come forward. He stated this park has been nearly ten years
in the development and provided the background and history of this project, beginning
with the filling in of the former K-Ply log pond, the signing of interlocal agreements
between the City, Port and Soroptimists International. Nearly $1.3 million was raised
through a combination of grants, fund raising,/n-kind and donated services to complete
this project, and now the City has a 3.5 acre park containing a healthy marine estuary.
5
- 1 -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 6, 2004
Presentation of "Spotlight Director Connelly then presented the 2004 Spotlight Facility Award ofExcellence for
F a c i 1 i t y A w a r d o f Parks and Facilities to Mayor Headrick and gave each of the pa.rtners in the project a
Excellence" for Valley framed certificate. He asked Linda DeBdrd of the Soroptimis[/trlntemational of Port
Creek Estuary Park Angeles to introduce the recipients which included Jackie Schwagler and Terry
(Cont'd) McDonald who were co-chairs, Cindy Sofie of PIP_A, Steve Zenovic of the Rotary
Club, and Ida McKeown, President of Soroptimis~International. Ms. DeBord went
on to thank the many clubs and organizations who helped make this park possible.
Skate Park Presentation 3. Presentation on Skate Park by Steve Zenovic
Mayor Headrick introduced Steve Zenovic and stated that he is very active in the
community and involved in many activities.
Mr. Zenovic stated that the skate park, like the Valley Creek Estuary Park and the
Dream Playground, is a community effort. He informed the Council that $100,000 in
committed money is necessary before entering into a contract with the skate park
builder to begin this project, and about $75,000 of this amount has been achieved,
thanks to the generosity of local vendors and individuals.
Mr. Zenovic displayed a map which demonstrated where the skate par ated/
adjacent to the Dream Playground, and its configuration. He noted that the same
landscaping architect would be used for the skate park in order to tie the two parks
together.
Mr. Zenovic felt this project was moving forward, as he anticipated taking a final
design to the Parks Board this month and an agreement between the Rotary Club and
the City has been drafted. He informed the Council that he and Director Connelly
discussed writing an RFP for a concession facility as a method of fund raising to pay
for maintenance of the park.
The Rotary is currently raising funds for the parkvia donation cans in various stores,
selling T-shirts, and a raffle and it is hoped to begin construction this fall. Mr. Zenovic
concluded by saying this was another great community project, which he was very
happy to be involved in. He then offered to answer questions and provide further
clarification.
Mayor Headrick offered his services for unskilled labor and made a donation to the
park on behalf of himself and his wife. Councilmember Rogers said she had a client
who might be able to help with materials donations and asked Mr. Zenovic to meet with
her on this issue.
Councilmember Williams inquired if professional competitions could be held at the
skate park and Mr. Zenovic stated this was one of the goals. He informed the Council
that the mother of Tony Hawk, a professional skateboarder, is a graduate of Port
Angeles High School and she is attempting to obtain some grants from professional
organizations.
Further discussion followed and Mr. Zenovic assured everyone that there would be no
net loss of soccer fields. He was asked ab°ut any negative impact the skate park would
have on the Dream Playground and he said discussions had taken place regarding this
issue and all involved felt comfortable with the two parks being side by side.
There were no further questions, and Mayor Headrick thanked Mr. Zenovic for his time
and presentation.
6
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 6, 2004
Chamber of Commerce 4. Chamber of Commerce Quarterly Report by Russ I/eenema, Chamber Director
Quarterly Report
Russ Veenema, Chamber Director, distributed copies of an article from National
Geographic on the Olympic National Park.
Mr. Veenema began by stating July 4th was a terrific event in Port Angeles and thanked
the Public Works, Police, Fire, and Parks Departments for their help and cooperation.
He estimated that between 8,000 and 10,000 people were in town for the 4 th of July
celebration and thanked the City and staff for allowing this event to happen.
Mr. Veenema began his report by using the VCR to demonstrate one of the six TV ads
that will be shown on KONG News at 10. He stated that each ad highlights a different
event taking place in Port Angeles, such as the Clallam County Fair, Heritage Day
Weekend, and the Dungeness Crab and Seafood Festival. Mr. Veenerr~a said that the
billboard on 1-5 will run the same message and he used his laptop computer to
demonstrate this to the Council.
Within the past month, the Peninsula News Network, with marketing assistance money,
has released an hourly guest service segment, which is running local TV. This will
update the public on tourist events and provide information on retail and restaurant
businesses in the area.
Referring to the National Geographic article he had distributed, he felt it contained very
good, factual, well-written information. Unfortunately, it does enhance the idea that
it rains here all the time, but it does give a lot of exposure and the Chamber has
received many calls because of it.
Mr. Veenema reported that "The Tacoma News Tribune" had an article in its June
addition on one-tank trips. Port Angeles was featured and a copy of this article is
included in the hand-out featuring the National Geographic article. He stated that
according to the "USA Today" travel is on the rise again.
Referring to the Chamber' s monthly report, Mr. Veenema stated that room tax, through
June, is up 11%, sales tax is up 10%, and room occupancy increased by about 7%-8%.
The web site visitor count is up 36% year-to-date, and June 2004 was the biggest month
with 50,000 visits, and anyone contemplating a trip to the Peninsula can now download
a vacation planner from the website.
Mr. Veenema concluded his presentation by sharing somecomments and e-mails he
has received regarding Port Angeles and thanked everyone involved for the cooperative
effort being made to market the City and thanked the Council for giving the Chamber
of Commerce the opportunity to serve the community.
WORK SESSION: None.
LATE ITEMS TO BE Manager Quinn informed the Council that Tim Smith, Director of Economic
PLACED ON THIS OR Development, had one late item presentation.
FUTURE AGENDAS:
Tim Smith, Director of Economic Development, stated he was present to speak as a
citizen and a volunteer for Port Angeles, not as a city employee. Mr. Smith then spoke
about the clean up at the former Burger King lot and explained how it came about and
plans for future efforts.
Using the VCR, Mr. Smith played a tape made by Dennis Bragg of the Peninsula News
Network, which showed Mr. Smith, Manager Quinn, Mayor Headrick, and community
leader Len Biel, cleaning up the Burger King lot. Mr. Smith stated that the work was
done on his own tin~ and cost thc taxpayersnothing. He then presented work shirts,
-3 -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 6, 2004
LATE ITEMS TO BE which he had purchased on his own, to those men that assisted himin this endeavor.
PLACED ON THIS OR
FUTURE AGENDAS: Mr. Smith stated there would be a clean-up on Thursday, July 8, 2004, at 5:30 p.m. at
(Cont'd) Lauridsen Blvd. across fromAlbertson's. Interested parties are invited to show up, and
they too will receive a T-shirt courtesy of Mr. Smith and his wife Michelle.
Referring back to the 4th of July festivities, Councilmember Braun asked Director
Connelly for a report on the damage done to several of the city restrooms.
Director Connelly responded that four restrooms were vandalized with fireworks,
which included those at Shane Park, City Pier, Ediz Hook and Elks Park. Damage is
estimated at $1,500 to $2,000. He said the west gate entrance to the Trail was
vandalized by a piece of moving equipment, but this has been repaired. Two of the
restrooms will be closed at least until Tuesday, another facility will be closed until
replacement fixtures can be found. Director Connelly stated that in his four yearson
staff, this is the worst damage he has seen due to a one day vandalism spree.
PUBLIC COMMENT Ed Tuttle, 3909 Old Time Place, Port Angeles, President of the Bay Loop Association,
FOR ITEMS NOT ON distributed and read aloud a letter which he had written to the Council. Mx. Tuttle
AGENDA opposed the City terminating water to the' PUD. In conclusion he asked any Council
member opposed to turning off the water to raise their hands, which met with no
response.
J. Anthony Hoare, owner of the Downtown Hotel located at the northeast comer of
Laurel and Front Streets, gave a brief history of the problems his business had due to
fire. He said that he had reopened only last year and people have been very
complimentary of his little European style hotel. However, recently chirpers were
installed with the new traffic signals. Unfortunately, they sound alarm-like and several
times guests have checked out and asked for a refund due to the noise. He asked for
a resolution to this problem.
Discussion ensued and several Council members agreed that the noise made by the new
signals was annoying any time of the day, but would be especially so at night. Director
of Public Works & Utilities Cutler was asked if there was a resolution to this problem.
Director Cutler stated because federal money was used to purchase the new signals,
ADA compliance was mandatory, hence the chirpers were installed for the visually
impaired. Staff was working with the contractor to see if the sound can be turned
down. It was suggested that the chirpers be button activated, but Director Cutler said
the use of a push button to activate the lights would interfere with the timing and would
probably cause traffic problems.
After further discussion, Councilmember Munro asked Director Cutler to report back
with possible solutions for this problem at the next Council meeting. However, if a
solution was discovered prior to the meeting, staff should go ahead and fix it and not
wait for Council approval.
Bill Henry, 2206 E. 6th Avenue, Gales Addition, spoke regarding the water/PUD issue.
He stated the PUD cannot legally disallow someone water service by virtue of belief,
as this would be discrimination. He felt the Council should consider this, as it may be
exposing itself, and the City as a whole, to lawsuits. He urged the Council to
reconsider its decision in this matter.
Dennis Bickford, General Manager of the PUD, stated he was here to update, invite and
respond to questions. First, regarding where the PUD stands on the issue, Mr. Bickford
stated the PUD voted unanimously to table any action on any contract with the City for
water. Therefore, the Commissioners are issuing an invitation to the Council and
Manager Quinn to meet with the PUD Commissioners on Thursday, July 8, 2004, at
8
- 4 -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 6, 2004
PUBLIC COMMENT 1:30 p.m., to discuss what each party wants. Mr. Bickford then offered to answer any
FOR ITEMS NOT ON questions the Council may have for him.
AGENDA
(Cont'd) Councilmember Munro remembered that the PUD staff had recommended the signing
of this contract in a form similar to where it is today. He asked Mr. Bickford what was
the reasoning behind that recommendation. Mr. Bickford stated he had made the
recommendation as the PUD is a utility district which provides electric, water, sewer,
and telecommunications. Without City water, the PUD has a problem. He said the
City and PUD have had a contract since 1944 and the PUD and its customers came to
expect the continuation of that contract and receipt of the water. He felt it would have
been foolish of him to recommend the contract not besigned, but that does not mean
he felt it was a good contract.
Mayor Headrick then made a statement regarding the issue. He said he had explained
to Mr. Bickford and PUD Commissioner Purser that the City is looking at the big
picture. The County approached the City regarding a sewer line for the UGA, as this
is a necessity to facilitate businesses and individuals who will reside in this area in the
future. An estimate was received in the amount of $5 million for placement of this
sewer line all the way out to Wal-Mart. Someone has to pay the $5 million; at this
point, everyone is looking to the citizens :af Port Angeles to pay this, which would
amount to approximately $350,000 in the first year. Whether or not the City proceeds
depends on if the area would be annexed some time in the future, as then the City
would appreciate greater revenue.
If an agreement cannot be worked out, whereby eventually the City can appreciate an
annexation in the future, then there won't be an annexation and one is stuck with the
same problem as occurred on Golf Course Road. Mayor Headrick then summarized
the problems encountered by those residents and the City when their septic systems
failed, and, they asked to be annexed in order to acquire sewer lines. The work had to
be rushed to avoid eviction of the residents.
The City is attempting to plan for the future as ordained by the Growth Management
Act, and provide utilities to the UGA. If the City provides a sewer line, there is no
requirement for anyone to hook up. Therefore, the City could end up with no hook ups
and a $5 million investment with no chance of annexation. Mayor Headrick stated that
the City had met with the PUD and explained that the no-protest agreements pertained
to new customers only and that the agreements would be null and void if the Citydid
not put in a sewer system.
Regarding the offer of another meeting with the PUD Commissioners, Mayor Headrick
stated the City had already offered a compromise. He did not feel there was anything
more to discuss. He thanked Mr. Bickford for appearing tonight and for the offer to
continue discussions, but he felt it was down to yes or no on the no-protest annexation
agreement.
In response, Mr. Bickford stated nothing Mayor Headrick said concerned the PUD and
neither does annexation. He asked if the Council was declining the offer to continue
discussion with the PUD. Mayor Headrick responded affirmatively.
Councilmember Munro supported the Mayor's comments and stated that the City does
not want to shut off water to the PUD. He agreed with the Mayor, putting a sewer line
into the UGA would be very expensive. Mr. Bickford responded that the PUD could
put in a sewer, if one is necessary; the issue is water, not annexation and not sewers.
Councilmember Rogers stated that she had responded to calls from the PUD, hands
were shaken, discussions were held regarding the agreement. Up until today, the phone
calls and communicationshave continued. She wanted the audience to understand that
the communication and work have been diligent by both parties, so she is a bit
9
- 5-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 6, 2004
PUBLIC COMMENT bewildered today to find the PUD voted to table the agreement at its meeting this
FOR ITEMS NOT ON afternoon. Agreements had been reached on the two items. She reminded Mr.
AGENDA Bickford that there has been a requirement for the PUD to seek alternative water
(Cont'd) sources and, most important, a reservoir.
Mr. Bickford again stated that if the City drops the annexation clause, the
Commissioners will sign the contract. D~ring the 18 months of this contract, a new
contract can be written. He will inform the Commissioners that Council has refused a
meeting and discussions are finished.
Councilmember Munro stated he took offense by some of what he has heard this
evening. Councilmembers have worked very hard on this issue and he felt some of the
comments, which singled out and threatened individual councilmembers, were very
inappropriate. He suggested extending the date for water shut offby one more week
and hold one more discussion.
Further discussion followed, and it was the consensus of the Council that further
discussion would be useless, as it is either yes or no on the no-protest agreement. The
PUD says no, the City says yes.
Mr. Bickford again stated annexation does not concern the PUD. He felt the PUD was
dragged into this because the City wants to add a no-protest annexation clause to a
contract that never referred to annexation in the past.
Councilmember Rogers reminded Mr. Bickford that at a meeting with Commissioner
Purser, Mr. Bickford, Mayor Headrick and herself, it was discussed that the City would
not buy any infrastructure and the PUD would continue to be the service provider for
that area. Also, it was agreed that upon signing of this agreement, the PUD and City
would work out a long-term water planning project. She again stated that the pre-
annexation is valueless unless a sewer line is needed, and that was acceptable to Mr.
Bickford at that time.
Mayor Headrick thanked Mr. Bickford for his time.
Ron Browning, 640 Cannon Road, stated he has invested between $20,000 and $30,000
in landscaping over the past five years. If he cannot water, he will lose it all. Also, he
is a former firefighter and was concerned over sufficient watefflow in the event of fire.
If the water is turned off, he will organize a boycott of Port Angeles businesses.
Jim Boarget, 313 N. Ridge View, said he just moved into the communityand found out
only yesterday about the water issue. Mr. Boarget admitted he is not fully informed,
but he will be investigating this issue. He gave a lengthy discourse chastising the
Council for its actions. He advised the residents of the affected area to seek legal
counsel and encouraged everyone affected by this to show up at the next Council
meeting to show their displeasure.
Mayor Headrick assured Mr. Boarget that attorneys for both sides have examined the
contract and the pre-annexation clause is not illegal nor unusual.
Mr. Boarget asked why the City Council feels it is essential to link the annexation issue
to shutting off the water.
Manager Quinn responded that the City.is working with Brown and Caldwell, an
internationally known engineering firm. The County is discussing a potential contract
with Brown and Caldwell to perform a feasibility study. This study will helpanswer
some of the questions raised such as the cost ora sewer, is it feasible, what route will
it take, etc.
10
- 6-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 6, 2004
PUBLIC COMMENT Another issue is the water being separate from annexation, and the arguments used to
FOR ITEMS NOT ON condemn Council can be turned around to condenm the PUD. There is a responsibility
AGENDA to perform capital facility planning and water capacity issues. The City wields the
(Cont'd) water to the PUD, which then provides service to its customers.
The lack of a contract will decrease some water capacity supplies, but it will not totally
cut off anyone's water. There will be an impact, but he did not feel it was as dire as
indicated.
Mr. Quinn stated that there were two huge issues at the beginning of these contract
negotiations. One was the issue of the pre-annexation agreement. This would not
impact current residents unless they decided to change their water service, such as by
changing from a 3/4 inch meter to a 1 inch meter. This is a rare occurrence. For new
water customers, it is only tied to sewers, as this would be a huge investment for the
City. This is an urban growth area, designated for the future growth of the City of Port
Angeles. Council and staff felt this was somewhat of a compromise, and realistically
in the next 18 months there will be very few pre-annexation agreements tied to water.
The second issue discussed was an extended contract. Both the City and PUD realized
that for this area to grow, there must be .some type of planning horizon that is long
enough to obtain return on investment for capital infrastructure and plan for future
annexation and related issues.
These are the types of things being looked at and Mr. Quinn hoped he helped allay
some of the fears expressed. He repeated that water will not be totally shut off,
although there could possibly be some restrictions in the future.
Mr. Boarget asked why the City can't wait for the feasibility study rather than creating
fear and concern.
Councilmember Williams stated that 313 N. Ridge View is outside of the Urban
Growth Area, which makes the whole situation even more complex. Mr. Boarget stated
his parents live in the UGA, therefore he still has concerns over this issue.
Richard Sieg, 2575 East Bay Street, Vice-President of the Bay Loop Neighborhood
Association, felt the City was using the PUD as an agent to enforce annexation and was
holding the UGA residents hostage by threatening to shut off the water, which he felt
was extortion. He asked if the water is shut off, a class action lawsuit is filed against
the City, and the plaintiffs prevail, is the City's budget healthy enough to pay this
expense or will it be passed on the taxpayers?
Mayor Headrick asked Attorney Bloor for his input. Attorney Bloor stated that pre-
annexation agreements are standard operating procedure. They are very common in
Washington State and are almost a requirement when a City provides services in a
UGA. Courts in Washington State have ruled on them, and they have been upheld.
Bob Hoyle, 2231 4th Avenue, Gales Addition, expressed his displeasure with the
Council's decision and stated that there wouldbe no reason for a sewer line as the soil
in his area is good and perks well. He presented the Mayor with a drawing outlining
the property owned by Mrs. Schmuck on Golf Course Road. He stated she owned only
one parcel of property but had to pay for seven sewer hookups.
He went on to state that ifa septic system is properly maintained it will last forever and
the City's sewer line is not needed.
Councilmember Munro, as one of the residents on Golf Course Road that sought
annexation and City sewer services, rebutted Mr. Hoyle's comments regarding that
issue. He stated that the costs did get out of control, but there was no choice as the
11
- 7 ~
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 6, 2004
PUBLIC COMMENT neighborhoodneeded the sewer line and time was running out. Councilmember Munro
FOR ITEMS NOT ON statedthattheneighborhood, includingMrs. Schmuck, voted to be annexed and receive
AGENDA sewer service. He stated that each resident knew how many lots they would be paying
(Cont'd) for at the time it was decided to annex, and this did not change.
Paul Lamoureux, 602 Whidby, wanted to inform the Council that he had a glowing and
positive report from the southeast neighborhood. He stated that the Public Works
Department listens to safety concerns of the citizens. He wanted the Council to know
that good things are happening around the City departments and gave his
congratulations to Finance Director Ziomkowski for doing a great job on budgeting and
winning the Budget Award again.
Mr. Lamoureux expressed hope that in August a report will be given by the Public
Works Department regarding the downspout disconnection project and on the energy
program.
Break Mayor Headrick recessed the meeting for a break at 8:12 p.m. The meeting reconvened
at 8:29 p.m.
FINANCE: 1. Elwha Underground Cable Replacement - Material Purchase
Elwha Underground Cable Director Cutler summarized the proposed purchase of underground electrical cable
Replacement Material from Consolidated Electrical Distributors (CED) through the State of Washington
Purchase Procurement Contract #07400.
Councilmember Rogers moved to authorize the purchase of underground
distribution cable for Light Operations, and authorize the City Manager to sign
the purchase order with CED in an amount not to exceed $69,000. The motion
was seconded by Councilmember Braun and carried unanimously.
Electric Underground 2. Electric Underground Rebuild Phase II, Project 02-11B, Elwha Line Stage 2.
Rebuild Phase II, Project
02-11B, ElwhaLine Director Cutler presented information regarding bids requested to rebuild
Stage 2 approximately 2,700 feet of underground electric service. Brief discussion followed
and Director Cutler responded to questions and provided clarification.
CouncilmemberRogers moved to award the contract for the Elwha Underground
Rebuild Phase II, Project 02-11, to Superior Electric Northwest Inc., and
authorize the Mayor to sign the contract in the amount of $119,108.34.
Councilmember Williams seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Peabody Creek Water 3. Peabody Creek Water Main, Project 02-02.
Main, Project 02-02
Director Cutler summarized the information regarding the request for bids to install
approximately 6,400 linear feet of water main within the Olympic National Park and
north along Eunice Street to 9th Street.
Following brief discussion and clarification, Councilmember Williams moved to
award the contract for Peabody CreekWater Main, Project No. 02-02, to Snelson
Companies Inc., and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract in the amount of
$1,271,101.94. Councilmember Braun seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Fairmount Pump Station, 4. Fairmount Pump Station, Project 02-26.
Project 02-26
Director Cutler reviewed the information regarding the request for bids to install a
water pump station and approximately 2,200 linear feet of water main to the Fairmount
area along US 101.
12
- 8 -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 6, 2004
Fairmount Pump Station, Councilmember Braun moved to award the contract for the Fairmount Pump
Project 02-26 Station, Project No. 02-26, to Jordan Excavation Inc., and authorize the Mayor
(Cont'd) to sign the contract in the amount of $699,635.33. Councilmember Munro
seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember Braun moved to accept the Consent Agenda, to include: 1.) City
Council Meeting minutes of June 14, 2004, and 2.) Expenditure Approval List - June
25, 2004 - $1,312,367.14, 3.) Electronic Payments - June 25, 2004 - $1,124,182.00,
4.) Police Department Communications Manager to attend Association Public Safety
Communications Officials, Inc. (APCO) Annual Conference, 5.) Early Renewal
Agreement for Prisoner Confinement Services with the City of Forks, 6.) Joint Use
Agreement with the Public Utility District (PUD) for 3-Phase Relay Equipment. The
motion was seconded by Councilmember Rogers and carried unanimously.
Councilmember Rogers commented that she was happy to see the City and PUD were
still making joint purchases. Councilmember Williams asked about a check to Frontier
Ford in the amount of $114,000 for police equipment and Director Ziomkowski
explained this was for the purchase of five police cars.
CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Braun noted that he and Councilmember Munro met with Director
COMMITTEE Connelly to review government-fundedproj ects and to discuss the Shane Park drainage
REPORTS: problem.
ORDINANCES NOT None.
REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
RESOLUTIONS: 2004-2010 Capital Facility Plan (CFP) and Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) Resolutions.
2004-2010 Capital Facility
P 1 a n ( C F P ) a n d Director of Public Works and Utilities Cutler gave a brief synopsis of the memo
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n contained in the packet regarding the CFP and TIP and noted the focus was on
Improvement Program transportation and getting things done. Using PowerPoint and referring to the lists
(TIP) Resolutions. contained in the packet, Director Cutler reviewed the GovemmentFund Projects under
consideration and the projects that would be delayed or cancelled. He noted that some
Resolution No. 11-04 and of the delayed projects could be brought back to Council to ask for matching funds if
Resolution No. 12-04 grants are received. Director Cutler summarized possible future projects and offered
to answer any questions.
Councilmember Rogers stated that a conservative approach was taken on the projects
given the budget restrictions. Hard decisions were made on prioritizing and there was
an overall strategy to move traffic and make the community more livable. She stated
the projects went through three sets of reviews before coming to Council.
Councilmember Rogers inquired abou~ project 20, City Pier/Hollywood Beach
Renovation. Councilmember Williams stated he could not support spending $85,000
when he doesn't know where it's going and it was suggested it be moved to delayed
projects. At Council's request, Manager Quinn explained that originally part of this
project was for improvement and repair of the restrooms at the City Pier, which has
already been instituted this year. Other parts of the project were riprap along the
waterfront and improving some of the concrete sidewalks.
Director Connelly explained that this project was, in part, planning for restoration of
the shoreline along the Waterfront Trail. Each winter, that section of the trail is subject
to storms and there is evidence that portions of the Trail have been undermined.
Currently, there is emergency repair each winter and part of this project would allow
for an assessment of the shoreline to find a permanent solution to this problem.
- 9-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 6, 2004
RESOLUTIONS: Another part of this project was to analyze the problems with the concrete, particularly
in the plaza area where the concerts occur, as it has uneven and differential settlement
2004-2010 Capital Facility as much of this area was fill.
Plan (CFP) and
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n CouncilmemberWilliamspointedoutthatthemoneybudgetedfor Shane Park was also
Improvement Program for planning issues and asked when there would be a comprehensive plan for parks.
(TIP) Resolutions. Director Connelly replied that the draft park comprehensive plan will be reviewed by
(Cont'd) the Parks Commission subcommittee this month. Included within that plan are
renovation and development items as well as long-range maintenance.
Resolution No. 11-04 and
Resolution No. 12-04 Referring to Shane Park, Director Connelly stated this project was for infrastructure
issues that staff felt needed to be addressed. The money budgeted for the Shane Park
project was not entirely for planning; the planning portion will cost about $26,000 and
the balance will go for future capital improvements for the drainage project.
Councilmember Munro stated the Parks Commission subcommittee is supporting the
full project, but will fund it in a different'mechanism that will become evident in the
near future. He supported the idea of leaving the City Pier/Hollywood Beach
Renovation project in the future category.
Councilmember Rogers added that the Puget Sound Action Team is an organization
that the City should look into for possible candidacy for beach restoration. She offered
to help work on this.
Councilmember Munro moved to remove project No. PK01-02~ City
Pier/Hollywood Beach Renovation, from current projects to future projects.
Councilmember Rogers seconded the motion, which carried unanimously
Manager Quinn said prior to tonight's meeting, Councilmember Erickson called and
asked to have a statement made on her behalf. Her interest was to be supportive of
Shane Park in terms of funding. She asked this be made part of the record, but she
would go along with the decision made by the Council.
Councilmember Rogers stated that all committees were supportive of fixing Shane
Park, but the concern has been the money, as it is a $300,000 project.
Brief discussion followed and Director Cutler was asked to clarify the amount
designated for Shane Park. Director Cutler stated that $50,000 of City governmental
funds is allocated and the remainder is unaccounted for at this time. It was his
understanding that the Parks Board with come back with a funding plan on this project.
Director Cutler stated, based on the motion to move the City Pier/Hollywood Beach
Renovation to delayed projects, staff would correct the dollar amounts in the
Resolution to reflect this change.
Mayor Headrick then read the Resolution by title, entitled
RESOLUTION NO. I 1-04
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, designation a portion of the General Fund balance
for certain capital projects.
Councilmember Braun moved to pass the Resolution, as amended, as read by title.
Councilmember Rogers seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Mayor Headrick read the next resolution by title, entitled
14
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 6, 2004
RESOLUTIONS: RESOLUTION NO. 12-04
2004-2010 Capital Facility A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
P 1 a n ( C F P ) a n d adopting the Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan/Transportation Improvement
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Program (TIP) for 2005-2010.
Improvement Program
(TIP) Resolutions. Councilmember Munro moved to pass the Resolution as read by title.
(Cont'd) CouncilmemberBraun seconded the motion. Councilmember Rogers stated she and
Councilmember Pittis reviewed the entire TIP with Public Works and attempted to put
Resolution No. 11-04 and the priority of the projects to address the major traffic situations throughout the City.
Resolution No. 12-04 Councilmember Braun thanked Councilmembers Rogers and Pittis for all the time and
dedication to this project and Councilmember Rogers noted the support received from
staff. A vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
OTHER l. Vincent Subdivision Preliminary Plat-Milwaukee/W. 10 '~ St. - 12 Unit
CONSIDERATIONS: Residential Subdivision in the RS-9 Zone.
Vincent Subdivision Director Collins reviewed the information pertaining to the Vincent Subdivision
Preliminary Plat Preliminary Plat, which proposes a 12-lot subdivision accessing from Milwaukee
MilwaukeeCW. ! nth St. Drive. Using PowerPoint, Director Collins demonstrated the area under discussion.
He then deferred to Assistant Planner Roberds. She said this is a five-acre parcel in the
RS-9 zone. Milwaukee Drive improvements will need to be made by the applicant, and
she identified the area where those improvements must be made on the PowerPoint
map.
Ms. Roberds stated that neighbors were concerned about the drainage on this property,
and explained how this issue is being addressed. She stated that Deputy Director of
Engineering Services Kenworthy would address drainage issues further should the
Council have questions.
Ms. Roberds continued to show slides which displayed a vicinity map, a map which
demonstrated the layout of the subdivision and the locations of the utility lines. Ms.
Roberds displayed an aerial view of the subdivision site, which demonstrated the
proximity of the neighbors' homes to the Milwaukee Drive right-of-way, should that
right-of-way be fully developed.
Councilmember Braun asked if there would be any mitigating measures should
Milwaukee Drive be improved to full standards. Ms. Roberds stated there would be
no mitigating measures. The property owners have the option of building a fence, but
it is City right-of-way and therefore fully developable.
Deputy Director Kenworthy explained that the developer can develop to the new
suburban road standard, which is only 24-feet wide. The right-of-way is 1 O0 feet. He
felt it unlikely the City would be clearing the entire right-of-way.
At Councilmember Rogers request, Ms. Roberds explained the steps necessary to
present a preliminary plat for consideration. Discussion followed and staff responded
to various questions and provided clarification on issues pertaining to right-of-way,
drainage, and street layouts.
Director Collins referred to slide three, which had been distributed to the Council prior
to the meeting, and pointed out the rights-of-way and the location of the existing homes
in the rights-of-way. He addressed written questions raised in a review by
Councilmember Pittis (who was unable to attend the meeting), which was sent to all
Councilmembers. Director Collins reviewed the questions and responded to them for
the Council. An error noted by Councilmember Pittis was Condition No. 5, which
reads".., an 8-inch water main... "and should read".., an 8-inch water service.
15
-11-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 6, 2004
OTHER Director Collins stated that once the preliminary subdivision is approved,
CONSIDERATIONS: improvements can be designed and implemented. Final plat approval involves a public
hearing before the City Council.
Vincent Subdivision
Preliminary Plat CouncilmemberRogers asked staff to make sure thatthe entire right-of-way is owned
Milwaukee/W. lffh St. by the City. Director Collins explained that a survey would have to take place before
(Cont'd) construction begins, which would identify the right-of-way boundaries.
Following further discussion and clarification regarding the extension and
improvements to Milwaukee Drive, Councilmember Williams asked ifmanufactured
homes wouldbe allowed in this area. Quint Boe, 84 Old State Rd., spoke as agent for
Darrell Vincent and stated it had not been decided whether or not mobile or
manufactured homes would be allowed in this development. He asked the Council to
approve this preliminary subdivision.
Councilmember Williams moved to approve the Preliminary Vincent Subdivision,
subject to Conditions 1 - 9, as corrected, Findings 1 - 24, and Conclusions A - F,
as set forth in Exhibit "A" which is attached to and becomes a part of these
minutes. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Munro and carried
unanimously.
Labor Contract Between 2. Labor Contract Between the City and IAFF #656.
the City and IAFF #656
Human Resources Manager Coons reviewed the information provided pertinent to this
issue.
Councilmember Braun moved to approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the
labor contract between the City and IAFF Local #656 covering the contract
period of January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2005, including retroactive
wages to January 2003. Councilmember Rogers seconded the motion. Manager
Quinn stated several positive things came out of this arbitration award. One, it allows
insurance premium payments to be supported by employees. Two, the arbitrator
stipulated a specific group of cities to be used in the analysis of wages and that will
benefit future negotiations. Mayor Headrick also noted that catch up wages were
disallowed. A vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None.
QUASI-JUDICIAL:
INFORMATION: Manager Quinn noted thc project update was completed and placed in Councilmcmbers
mail boxes.
Manager Quinn ~also recognized Finance Director Ziomkowski for receiving the
Distinguished Budget Presentation Award from the Government Finance Officers
Association.
Director Ziomkowski announced that the award was to the City, not to her personally.
She stated that this is the most team-consumed project in the City and it's done
annually. The award would not be possible without the involvement of Council, the
Finance Committee, and all Department Heads and staff. She thanked everyone for
their assistance.
EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Mayor announced there was need for an Executive Session under RCW 42.30.110
(1)(i), to discuss one item with legal counsel representing the agency matters relating
to potential litigation. Estimated time for the Executive Session was 40 minutes. The
meeting adjourned to Executive Session at 9:45 p.m.
16
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 6, 2004
RETURN TO OPEN The Executive Session concluded at 10:25 p.m., no action was taken, and the Council
SESSION: reconvened in regular open session.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 10:25 p.m.
Richard A. Headrick, Mayor Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
17
18
4-~z, Date: 7/14~04
'!' ~; City of Port Angeles
~ City Council Expenditure Report
~, * From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS PENINSULA DAILY NEWS 001-0000-213.10-90 17.40
BROOKE & ASSOC INC, ROBERT HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-0000-237.00-00 -11.93
CLALLAM CNTY TREASURER CVCA Remittance-June 001-0000-229.40-00 291.04
DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 001-0000-237.00-00 -18.47
GIFT ASSISTANTS USA LUGGAGE,BRIEF CASES,PURSE 001-0000-237.00-00 -22.81
MASUNE Fanny packs 001-0000-237.00-00 -9.54
MILLER, NANCY L Buy back Deed #4370 001-0000-237.30-00 -56.69
AMANDA BOYD Reissue ck 057150-PR 001-0000-263.90-10 80.88
LAURIE DAVIS Reissue ck 44880-UB rfd 001-0000-263.90-10 75.00
MICHAEL DEMPSEY Reissue ck 048764-PR 001-0000-263.90-10 139.66
Marsha Welch LONGHOUSE DEP RFD 001-0000-239.10-00 50.00
Roberta Heath PIER DEP RFD 001-0000-239.10-00 350.00
Walmart LONGHOUSE DEP RFD 001-0000-239.10-00 50.00
PEAK SOFTWARE SYSTEMS INC SportsMan Basic pe 11-22 001-0000-237.00-00 -24.82
QUILL CORPORATION CD cases,camera,stand 001-0000-237.00-00 -8.33
Audio,video tapes 001-0000-237.00-00 -15.74
Office supplies 001-0000-237.00-00 -9.77
Hanging files 001-0000-237.00-00 -3.56
Support cushions 001-0000-237.00-00 -2.08
Office supplies 001-0000-237.00-00 -7.34
RECREONICS INCORPORATED SPORTING & ATHLETIC EQUIP 001-0000-237.00-00 -19.46
S & S WORLDWIDE INC BADGES & OTHER ID EQUIP. 001-0000-237.00-00 -6.55
WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER District Ct Revenue-June 001-0000-229.10-00 216.00
District Ct Revenue-June 001-0000-229.30-00 12,948.47
Division Total: $14,001.36
Department Total: $14,001.36
ADVANCED TRAVEL AWC Conference-Pittis 001-1160-511.43-10 652.11
AWC-ASSN OF WASHINGTON CITIES AWC Conference-Headrick 001-1160-511.43-10 15.00
SAFEWAY INC COUNCIL COOKIES 001-1160-511.31-01 7.98
Legislative Mayor & Council Division Total: $675.09
Legislative Department Total: $675.09
ADVANCED TRAVEL AWC Conference-Q uin n 001-1210-513.43-10 186.25
AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE 06-13 a/c 0172134468001 001-1210-513.42-10 74.59
SAFEWAY INC MEETING REFRESHMENTS 001-1210-513.31-01 3.99
VERIZON WIRELESS 06-15 a/c 36421103700001 001-1210-513.42-10 10.44
City Manager Department City Manager Office Division Torah $275.27
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP Shipping chgs-June 001-1220-516.42-10 9.79
City Manager Department Human Resources Division Total: $9.79
ADVANCED TRAVEL WMCA Board Mtg-Upton 001-1230-514.43-10 154.84
City Manager Department City Clerk Division Total: $154.84
City Manager Department Department Total: $439.90
ADVANCED TRAVEL WMTA Board mtg-YZ 001-2010-514.43-10 26.25
19
Page 1
.~ ~:~,~ Date: 7/14/04
':~: ~ City of Port Angeles
~) City Council Expenditure Report
:'"'~ From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
ADVANCED TRAVEL... GFOA Conference-YZ 001-2010-514.43-10 783.99
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Customized dept cards-YZ 001-2010-514.31-01 8.12
Finance Department Finance Administration Division Total: $818.36
WASHINGTON (AUDITOR), STATE OF Audit svcs-March 001-2023-514.41-50 6,426.00
WASHINGTON (DOH), STATE OF Audit svcs-March 001-2023-514.41-50 6,426.00
Audit svcs-M arch 001-2023-514.41-50 -6,426.00
Finance Department Accounting Division Total: $6,426.00
APEX CREDIT BUREAU CREDIT REPORT GLC HOMES I 001-2025-514.41-50 27.05
DATABAR INCORPORATED CYCLES 6-10 6/17/04 001-2025-514.41-50 1,986.99
CYCLES 11-15 6/24/04 001-2025-514.41-50 1,451.76
EQUlFAX CREDIT REPORTS 001-2025-514.41-50 110.25
Hainstock LISA BOOT ALLOWANCE 001-2025-514.31-11 110.00
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS STORAGE BOXES 001-2025-514.31-01 275.39
Finance Department Customer Service Division Total: $3,961.44
RICOH BUSINESS SYSTEMS JUNE COPIER LEASE 001-2080-514.45-30 632.72
SAVIN CORPORATION MONTHLY COPY COSTS 001-2080-514.45-30 445.39
XEROX CORPORATION MAY LEASE AGREEMENT 001-2080-514.45-30 98.70
MAY LEASE AGREEMENT 001-2080-514.45-30 2,583.22
MAY LEASE AGREEMENT 001-2080-514.45-30 647.74
Finance Department Reprographics Division Total: $4,407.77
Finance Department Department Total: $15,613.57
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP COPIER LEASE JULY 001-3010-515.45-30 83.35
MA'FI-HEW BENDER & CO INC WA Appellate Rpts V117 001-3010-515.31-01 21.39
Attorney Attorney Office Division Totah $104.74
CLALLAM CNTY DIST 1 COURT May Court costs 001-3021-515.50-90 6,068.24
June Court costs 001-3021-515.50-90 6,901.54
CLALLAM JEFFERSON PUBLIC DFNDR Public Defender fees-July 001-3021-515.41-50 2,750.00
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP COPIER LEASE JULY 001-3021-515.45-30 194.50
Attorney Prosecution Division Total: $15,914.28
Attorney Department Total: $16,019.02
DUNGENESS COMMUNICATIONS INC WEB SITE MAINT. 001-4010-558.41-50 30.00
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Office supplies-Roberds 001-4010-558.31-01 101.99
Community Developmt Dept Planning Division Total: $131.99
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP COPIER LEASE JULY 001-4020-524.45-30 173.02
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER ICC mtg-Collins 001-4020-524.43-10 11.35
Community Developmt Dept Building Division Total: $184.37
Community Developmt Dept Department Total: $316.36
ADVANCED TRAVEL Assessment Center-TG 001-5010-521.43-10 28.50
PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING 2nd Qtr Subscription fees 001-5010-521.41-50 245.00
PUGET SOUND POLYGRAPH EXAMINERS Pre-employment screenings 001-5010-521.41 -50 600.00
QUILL CORPORATION Hanging files 001-5010-521.31-01 46.40
Support cushions 001-5010-521.31 -01 27.07
20
Page 2
· Date: 7/14/04
'~, City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
'~'* From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
QWEST 06-23 a/c 206T411918873B 001-5010-521.42-10 60.56
Police Department Administration Division Total: $1,007.53
SAFEWAY INC Photo processing 001-5021-521.49-90 37.04
Police Department Investigation Division Total: $37.04
ADVANCED TRAVEL DV Training Conf-McFall 001-5022-521.43-10 421.86
Supervisory Skills-GR 001-5022-521.43-10 9.75
Supervisory Skills-Ed S 001-5022-521.43-10 97.12
Firearms Range-Wood 001-5022-521.43-10 246.22
BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP Clothing allowance-Thomas 001-5022-521.20-80 904.84
Uniform allowance-AB 001-5022-521.20-80 220.76
PEN PRINT INC Statements 001-5022-521.31-01 194.94
PENINSULA RADIOLOGISTS P S Medical chgs-Dropp 001-5022-521.49-90 29.75
VERIZON WIRELESS 06-15 a/c 26421103600001 001-5022-521.42-10 162.93
Police Department Patrol Division Total: $2,288.17
BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP Mini badges 001-5029-521.49-90 770.30
COSTCO CREDIT CARD PMTS PRINTER FOR PD 001-5029-521.31 -60 216.59
QUILL CORPORATION CD cases,camera,stand 001-5029-521.31-01 108.70
Office supplies 001-5029-521.31 -01 127.46
QWEST 06-20 a/c 206Z200017790B 001-5029-521.42-10 261.70
Police Department Records Division Total: $1,484.75
Police Department Department Total: $4,817,49
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP COPIER LEASE JULY 001-6010-522.45-30 212.83
Fire Department Administration Division Total: $212.83
VERIZON WIRELESS 06-15 a/c 66421143200001 001-6020-522.42-10 4.47
06-15 a/c 66424372000001 001-6020-522.42-10 13.39
Fire Department Fire Supression Division Total: $17.86
CLALLAM CNTY EMS Medic 1 Advisory-July 001-6025-526.41-50 600.00
MOROZ, JAMES Teach First Aid 001-6025-526.31-08 250.00
VERIZON WIRELESS 06-15 a/c 26439572400001 001-6025-526.42-10 10.44
Fire Department Medic I Division Total: $860.44
THURMAN SUPPLY Valve box 001-6050-522.48-10 8.64
Fire Department Facilities Maintenance Division Total: $8,64
Fire Department Department Total: $1,099.77
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN ENGINEER POSITION AD 001-7010-532.44-10 190.00
CLALLAM CNTY INFORMATION TECHNOL VIDEO CONFERENCE 001-7010-532.42-10 65.23
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP COPIER LEASE JULY 001-7010-532.45-30 64.96
GARY KENWORTHY Reimburse mileage 001-7010-532.43-10 56.25
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Postage-Rinehart 001-7010-532.42-10 37.00
QUILL CORPORATION Office supplies 001-7010-532.31-01 95.67
WASHINGTON (OMWBE), STATE OF Political Subdivision fee 001-7010-532.49-01 125.00
XEROX CORPORATION MAY LEASE AGREEMENT 001-7010-532.45-30 1,201.34
Public Works-Gen Fnd Administration Division Total: $1,835.45
21
Page 3
-,~';- Date: 7/14/04
':?~ ~; City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
,~,.~,~ From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
Public Works-Gen Fnd Department Total: $1,835.45
DRAKE'S PIZZA & SUBS PK BD TOUR LUNCH 001-8010-574.31-01 77.52
MASUNE Fanny packs 001-8010-574.31-01 124.39
RICOH BUSINESS SYSTEMS COPIER LEASE JUNE 001-8010-574.45-3O 256.48
Parks & Recreation Administration Division Total: $458.39
PEAK SOFTWARE SYSTEMS INC SportsMan Basic pe 11-22 001-8011-574.31-01 323.82
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Binders-Bilsborrow 001-8011-574.31-01 43.36
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-8011-574.31-01 78.56
Parks & Recreation Recreation Division Total: $445.74
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP COPIER LEASE JULY 001-8012-555.45-30 171.40
QWEST 06-14 a/c 3604577004947 B 001-8012-555.42-10 42.64
06-20 ale 206T217227465 B 001-8012 -555.42-10 121.12
S & S WORLDWIDE INC BADGES & OTHER ID EQUIP.' 001-8012-555.31-01 21.32
Parks & Recreation Senior Center Division Total: $356.48
CAPTAIN '~S U N I F O R M S 001-8020-576.31-01 377.53
UNIFORM 001-8020-576.31-01 453.24
VIVIAN MOROZ Lifeguard class refund 001-8020-347.30-13 100.00
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Pizza-Oliver 001-8020-576.31-01 18.93
S & S WORLDWIDE INC BADGES & OTHER ID EQUIP. 001-8020-576.31-01 21.43
Parks & Recreation William Shore Pool Division Total: $971.13
DEX MEDIA WEST LLC DIRECTORY ADVERTISING-JUN 001-8050-536.44-10 71.10
MILLER, NANCY L Buy back Deed ~4370 001-8050-343.60-12 750.00
Buy back Deed ~4370 001-8050-343.60-13 -530.00
Buy back Deed ~,370 001-8050-343.60-14 875.00
Buy back Deed ~,370 001-8050-343.60-15 -400.00
Buy back Deed #4370 001-8050-343.60-16 250.00
THURMAN SUPPLY PIPE FITTINGS 001-8050-536.31-20 53.50
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8050-536.31-20 39.14
XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT-MAY 001-8050-536.45-30 58.17
Parks & Recreation Ocean View Cemetery Division Total: $1,166.91
BROOKE&ASSOC INC, ROBERT HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20 155.64
CED/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 001-8080-576.31-20 52.75
FOWLER COMPANY, H D AGRICULTURAL EQUIP&IMPLEM 001-8080-594.63-10 445.30
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-594.63-10 1,685.62
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-594.63-10 121.73
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-594.63-10 6.69
GRAINGER ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 001-8080-576.31-20 177.39
MATHEWS GLASS CO INC PRODUCTION&MANUFACTURING 001-8080-576.31-20 472.73
METROCALL 06-09 A/C 298-A16289 001-8080-576.42-10 49.49
RECREONICS INCORPORATED SPORTING & ATHLETIC EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20 253.85
STEUBER DISTRIBUTING INC AGRICULTURAL EQUIP&IMPLEM 001-8080-576.31-40 608.69
THURMAN SUPPLY PIPE AND TUBING 001-8080-576.31-20 27.62
22
Page 4
t .~, Date: 7/14~04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
%~'~' From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
THURMAN SUPPLY... PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 001-8080-576.31-20 147.28
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-576.31-20 49.95
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20 28.96
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-576.31-20 44.86
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20 74.73
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-576.31-20 89.30
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-576.31-40 10.83
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-594.63-10 29.64
XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT-MAY 001-8080-576.45-30 58.17
Parks & Recreation Park Facilities Division Total: $4,591.22
Parks & Recreation Department Total: $7,989.87
METROCALL 06-09 a/c 298-A16291 001-8130-518.42-10 98.98
ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY INC POISONS:AGRICUL & INDUSTR 001-8130-518.41-50 57.40
XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT-MAY 001-8130-518.45-30 58.16
Parks & Rec-Maintenance Custodial/Janitorial Svcs Division Total: $214.54
Parks & Rec-Maintenance Department Total: $214.54
General Fund Fund Total: $63,022.42
BREWER, DAVID Contract svcs-July 101-1430-557.49-90 100.00
PORT ANGELES CHAMBER OF COMM 2004 MKTG CONTRACT 101-1430-557.50-83 3,411.76
Convention Center Convention Center Division Total: $3,511.76
Convention Center Department Total: $3,511.76
Convention Center Fund Fund Total: $3,511.76
LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC ROAD/HWY MATERIALS ASPHLT 102-7230-542.31-20 168.45
ROAD/HWY MATERIALS ASPHLT 102-7230-542.31-20 497.49
KEN RIDOUT Reimburse mileage 102-7230-542.43-10 66.60
PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY 06-09 Woodhaven Ln 102-7230-542.47-10 15.26
06-14 SR 101 & Euclid 102-7230-542.47-10 15.02
06-22 Lauridsen Blvd & L 102-7230-542.47-10 19.10
RECYCLED EARTH PRODUCTS INC SEED,SOD,SOIL&INOCULANT 102-7230-542.31-20 58.48
SEED,SOD,SOIL&INOCULANT 102-7230-542.31-20 38.99
THURMAN SUPPLY PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 102-7230-542.31-20 69.13
CONCRETE & METAL CULVERTS 102-7230-542.31-20 14.70
CONCRETE & METAL CULVERTS 102-7230-542.31-20 4.74
VERIZON WIRELESS 06-15 a/c 76426408900001 102-7230-542.42-10 5.45
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC SIGNS, SIGN MATERIAL 102-7230-542.31-25 56.74
Public Works-Street Street Division Total: $1,030.15
Public Works-Street Department Total: $1,030.15
Street Fund Fund Total: $1,030.15
CLALLAM CNTY ECONOMIC DEV CNCL 2nd Qtr 2004 103-1511-558.41-50 8,750.00
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER PABA mtgs-Smith 103-1511-558.43-10 22.92
Economic Development Economic Development Division Total: $8,772.92
23
Page 5
4;~4- Date: 7/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
,?,.,~ From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
Economic Development Department Total: $8,772.92
Economic Development Fund Total: $8,772.92
ADVANCED TRAVEL MSAG Forum-O'Connor 107-5160-528.43-10 70.00
CAPTAIN 'PS Custom embroidery 107-5160-528.20-80 16.25
GLOBALSTAR USA 06-16 a/c 1.10012959 107-5160-528.42-10 39.91
QUILL CORPORATION Audio,video tapes 107-5160-528.31-01 205.34
QWEST INTERPRISE AMERICA INC 06-21 a/c WAM 182-0205 107-5160-528.42-11 217.20
Key Pad Model 683 107-5160-528.42-11 458.54
Pencom Pencom Division Total: $1,007.24
Pencom Department Totah $1,007.24
Pencom Fund Fund Total: $1,007.24
GIFT ASSISTANTS USA LUGGAGE,BRIEF CASES,PURSE 174-8221-574.31-01 297.66
PRINTING.SILK SCR,TYPSET 174-8221-574.31-01 47.82
PRINTING,SILK SCR,TYPSET 174-8221-574.31-01 -3.67
Recreation Activities Sports Programs Division Total: $341.81
CAPTAIN T'S Shirts 174-8222-574.31-01 676.60
PETERSON, SCOTT PAYMENT REPTILE SHOW 174-8222-574.41-50 400.00
S & S WORLDWIDE INC BADGES & OTHER ID EQUIP. 174-8222-574.31-01 21.32
Recreation Activities Special Events Division Total: $1,097.92
DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY ART EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES 174-8224-574.31-01 146.22
OFFICE SUPPLY,INKS,LEADS 174-8224-574.31-01 12.34
SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 174-8224-574.31-01 82.40
Randy Lawrence OVERPMT RFD ASP 174-8224-347.60-20 70.00
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Rec Express supplies-KC 174-8224-574.31-01 7.43
S & S WORLDWIDE INC BADGES & OTHER ID EQUIP. 174-8224-574.31-01 21.33
Recreation Activities Youth/Family Programs Division Total: $339.72
Recreation Activities Department Total: $1,779.45
Park & Recreation Fund Fund Total: $1,779.4,~
RUDDELL INTERNATIONAL Ammunition 182-5423-521.31 -01 1,347.40
Drug Task Force Drug Task Force Division Total: $1,347.40
Drug Task Force Department Total: $1,347.40
Drug Task Force Fund Total: $1,347.413
OLYMPIC ELECTRIC CO INC Release retainage 310-7930-595.65-10 12,831.83
WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY Yellow Armor tile 310-7930-595.65-10 4,681.23
Capital Projects-Pub Wks GF-Street Projects Division Total: $17,513.06
Capital Projects-Pub Wks Department Total: $17,513.06
Capital Improvement Fund Total: $17,513.06
CLALLAM TITLE CO Purchase 328 E 5th St 314-0000-171.10-00 219,912.19
Division Total: $219,912.19
Department Torah $219,912.19
Property Management Fund Fund Total: $219,912.1S
24
Page 6
~z Date: 7/14/04
City of Port Angeles
(%~0~) City Council Expenditure Report
...... From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
ALLFORM WELDING INC Railings-Carnegie Library 327-7931-594.65-10 5,903.87
FOWLER COMPANY, H D LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 327-7931-594.35~01 146.61
Capital Projects-Pub Wks GF-Carnegie Restoration Division Total: $6,050.48
Capital Projects-Pub Wks Department Total: $6,050.48
GF - Carnegie Library Fnd Fund Total: $6,050.48
GPA SERVICES INTERNATIONAL LLC EPOXY BASED FORMULAS 401-0000-237.00-00 -61.25
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF401-0000-237.00-00 -60.36
EPOXY BASED FORMULAS 401-0000-237.00-00 -222.15
AFFOURTIT, PAULA UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 204.73
ALBERTS, JUNE MARIE MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 48.61
ANDERSON, DALE R UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 75.54
BALL, ANGLE UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 64.80
BIGGAR, DAVID C UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 40.08
BURKE, STEVE MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 140.49
CHATHAM, MARY MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 123.97
CHRISTENSEN, STEPHEN &SHAO MEI UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 77.82
CRESCENT DEVELOPMENT MAN UAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 96.14
DUNN, BARBARA UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 45.82
HAGGERTY, GINNY MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 113.66
HAGGERTY, MARK MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 41.60
HART, DIANE MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 61.80
HOUSING AUTHORITY MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 67.02
HUNSlCKER, IRIS UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 42.31
KUSHMAN, H E MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 113.55
LANDMARK INC, PROPERTIES BY MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 40.18
MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 17.28
LESNICK, LEO UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 96.39
LUO, WE~ UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 32.06
LYSTER, MICHELLE UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 52.48
MIDDELTON, AUBBY UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 39.31
NEWLIN, AMBER UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 44.42
NISHIMOTO, MIHO UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 71.15
PERKA, ZACK UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 63.24
PIKSA, BEN UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 92.16
PLUTE, ROBERT L BUDGET CREDIT REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 966.14
PROPERTIES BY LANDMARK INC MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 48.48
QIN, YANG UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 91.34
SAMPSON, KAREN UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 110.41
SCHILDKNECHT, LOIS MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 86.26
SIMS, MIKE UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 71.21
SKANNES, CHRISTINA MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 103.05
SMITH, BRIGE'I-rE MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 102.60
Page 7
-~z. Date: 7/14/04
'?:' ~' City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
SMITH, JASON R UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 148.86
SMOKE, KELLY UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 57.90
SPRINGOB, ADAM UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 110.65
ST LAURENT, JOHN MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 16.04
STEELE-MALEY, THOMAS MANUAL CH ECK 401-0000-122.10-99 181.96
THOMPSON, FRANOESS CREDIT BALANCE REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 100.24
TIDERMAN, JERRIE BUDGET CREDIT REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 600.43
WILHELM, TARA MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 42.86
WINDERMERE PROP MANAGEMENT MANUAL CHECK 401-0000-122.10-99 38.83
QUILL CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-0000-237.00-00 -2.74
OFFICE SUPPLY, INKS,LEADS 401-0000-237.00-00 -!.55
WESTERN STATES ELECTRIC INC FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 401-0000-141.40-00 106.13
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-0000-141.40-00 1,981.89
Division Total: $6,523.84
Department Total: $6,523.84
CH2M HILL INC Prof svcs pe 06-04 401-7120-533.41-50 557.72
CLEARING UP: NEWSDATA CORP Service Aug-Oct 401-7120-533.49-01 1,191.36
Public Works-Electric Power Resource Mgmt Division Total: $1,749.08
CED/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DISTINC ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01 75.81
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 285.91
GLASS SERVICES CO INC Repair vandalism 401-7180-533.48-10 321.65
GRA SERVICES INTERNATIONAL LLC EPOXY BASED FORMULAS 401-7180-533.48-10 799.10
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF401-7180-533.48-10 787.56
EPOXY BASED FORMUEAS 401-7180-533.48-10 2,898.58
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING CORP COPIER LEASE JULY 401-7180-533.45-30 186.49
HANSEN SUPPLY COMPANY INC TAPE(NOT DP,SOUND,VIDEO) 401-7180-533.31-20 1,365.21
M ETROCALL 06-09 a/c 298-A13316 401-7180-533.42-10 84.26
KATHLEEN GRAF Job 9785 overpmt rfd 401-7180-379.00-00 1,298.32
NORTHWEST PUBLIC POWER ASSN May Safety Training 401-7180-533.41-50 1,641.16
PARSINEN LANDSCAPE MAINT INC Landscape maintenance-Jun 401-7180-533.48-10 1,732.80
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Callout meals-Oman 401-7180-533.43-10 21.50
QUILL CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.31-01 35.65
OFFICE SUPPLY,INKS,LEADS 401-7180-533.31-01 20.21
ROHLINGER ENTERPRISES INC HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF401-7180-533.35-01 174.87
THURMAN SUPPLY ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 66.86
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 11.50
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 75.99
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 171.80
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 27.29
UW IR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Road Maintenance-VD 401-7180-533.43-10 125.00
Road Maintenance-TB 401-7180-533.43-10 125.00
VERIZON WIRELESS 06-15 a/c 1869442695 401-7180-533.42-10 36.91
26
Page 8
Date: 7/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
~,,.',,~,~- From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC HAND TOOLS ,POW&NQN POWEF401-7180-533.35-01 337.28
WESTERN STATES ELECTRIC INC Connectors,extender 401-7180-533.34-03 84.66
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CO FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 401-7180-533.31-20 279.14
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC SIGNS, SIGN MATERIAL 401-7180-533.48-10 379.18
Pubfic Works-Electric Electric Operations Division Total: $13,449.69
Public Works-Electric Department Total: $1,5,198.77
Electric Utility Fund Fund Total: $21,722.61
AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN PUBLICATION/AUDIOVISUAL 402-0000-237.00-00 -16.19
PUBLICATION/AUDIOVISUAL 402-0000-237.00-00 -16.19
PUBLICATION/AUDIOVISUAL 402-0000-237.00-00 -11.21
FOWLER COMPANY, H D PIPE FITTINGS 402-0000-141.40-00 459.77
PIPE FITTINGS 402-0000-141.40-00 218.61
Division Total: $634.79
Department Total: $634.79
ADVANCED TRAVEL Backflow Class-Becker 402-7380-534.43-10 202.60
Pump School-Flores 402-7380-534.43-10 409.05
AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN PUBLICATION/AUDIOVISUAL 402-7380-534.31-01 146.21
PUBLICATION/AUDIOVISUAL 402-7380-534.31-20 211.19
PUBLICATION/AUDIOVISUAL 402-7380-534.31-20 211.19
AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE 06-15 a/c 0584912554001 402-7380-534.42-10 47.46
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP Shipping chgs-June 402-7380-534.42-10 22.61
Shipping chgs-June 402-7380-534.42-10 19.10
Shipping chgs-June 402-7380-534.42-10 9.63
GRCC/WW HUMAN SERVICES 402-7380-534.43-10 95.00
HUMAN SERVICES 402-7380-534.43-10 275.00
ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY INC EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 402-7380-534.41-50 86.64
PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY 06-10 203 Reservoir Rd 402-7380-534.47-10 24.42
06-22 Crown Z Water Rd 402-7380-534.47-10 16.37
QWEST 06-23 a/c 206T411255315B 402-7380-534.42-10 64.21
UW IR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON HUMAN SERVICES 402-7380-534.43-10 125.00
VERIZON WIRELESS 06-15 a/c 26421490800001 402-7380-534.42-10 34.97
06-15 a/c 26421490800002 402-7380-534.42-10 36.99
Public Works. Water Water Division Total: $2,037.64
Public Works-Water Department Total: $2,037.64
Water Fund Fund Total: $2,672.43
THERMAL PIPE SYSTEMS PIPE AND TUBING 403-0000-237.00-00 -105.86
Division Total: -$105.86
Department Total: -$105.86
ADVANCED TRAVEL Pump School-Groves 403-7480-535.43-10 409.05
PNCWA School-Williams 403-7480-535.43-10 338.49
PNCWA mtg-Young 403-7480-535.43-10 39.00
PNCWA School-Young2 7 403-7480-535.43-10 313.49
Page 9
. ~.,. ;,,t;~,¢,~,¥. Date: 7/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
'~" From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
ANGELES COMMUNICATIONS INC Repair Line 2 break room 403-7480-535.424 0 70.40
Service call modems 403-7480-535.42-10 35.20
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP Shipping chgs-June 403-7480-535.42~10 82.50
GRCC/WW HUMAN SERVICES 403-7480-535.43-10 275.00
KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES BEARINGS (EXCEPT WHEEL) 403-7480-535.31-20 419.26
PARSINEN LANDSCAPE MAINT INC Landscape maintenance-Jun 403-7480-535.41-50 633.63
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Ice-Young 403-7480-535.31-20 5.16
RYAN HERCO PRODUCTS CORP PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 609.94
THERMAL PIPE SYSTEMS PIPE AND TUBING 403-7480-535.31-20 1,381.21
TMG SERVICES INC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS 403-7480-535.31-20 99.24
UW IR UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON HUMAN SERVICES 403-7480-535.43-10 125.00
VERIZON WIRELESS 06-15 a/c 36469358100001 403-7480-535.42-10 17.76
06-15 a/c 76423363300001 403-7480-535.42-10 16.70
Pub#c Works-WW/Stormwtr Wastewater Division Total'. $4,871.03
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: $4,871.03
Wastewater Fund Fund Total: $4,765.17
CAPTAIN T'S NEW EMPLOYEE CITY SHIRT 404-7580-537.31-01 44.73
LAUREL BLACK DESIGN LOGO DESIGN 404-7580-537.44-10 500.00
PARSINEN LANDSCAPE MAINT INC Landscape maintenance-Jun 404-7580-537.48-10 652.06
PEN PRINT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 404-7580-537.44-10 398.00
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Telephone-Stromski 404-7580-537.31-01 19.45
Computer mouse-Stromski 404-7580-537.31-60 32.48
Safety mtg-Stromski 404-7580-537.43-10 10.48
SANDERSON SAFETY SUPPLY CO JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 404-7580-537.35-01 33.79
CLOTHING & APPAREL 404-7580-537.35-01 73.00
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 404-7580-537.35-01 42.67
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 404-7580-537.35-01 64.07
Public Works-Solid Waste Solid Waste-Collections Division Total: $1,870.73
Public Works-Solid Waste Department Total: $1,870.73
Solid Waste-Collections Fund Total: $1,870.73
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP Shipping chgs-June 405-7585-537.31-01 5.82
IBM CORPORATION COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPH405-7585-537.31-20 964.96
COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC. 405-7585-537.31-20 187.25
OVERALL LAUNDRY SERVICES INC COVERALL RENTAL 405-7585-537.31-20 92.37
PARAMETRIX INC Prof svcs pe 05-28 405-7585-537.41-50 16,037.11
Public Works-Solid Waste Solid Waste-Landfill Division Total: $17,287.51
Public Works-Solid Waste Department Total: $17,287.51
Solid Waste-Landfill Fund Total: $17,287.51
ABSOLUTE AIR INC City rebate-Elliott 421-7121-533.49-86 1,000.00
MATHEWS GLASS CO INC City rebate-Neudor[er 421-7121-533.49-86 665.00
CARL H & JORDIS A OMAN City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00
ISE H ERTZOG City rebate 2 8 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00
Page 10
z Date: 7/14/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
"~'~ From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
JAN RIDOUT City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00
KAREN SUE SCOTT City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00
MARK ATWELL City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00
MICHAEL QUINN City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00
MICHAEL TODD City rebate balance 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00
TERRY PISTER City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 50.00
VICTOR COX City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86 40.00
Public Works-Electric Conservation Loans Division Total: $2,105.00
Public Works-Electric Department Total: $2,105.00
Conservation Loans/Grants Fund Total: $2,105.00
CH2M HILL INC Prof svcs pe 06-04 452-7388-594.41~50 3,285.41
Prof svcs pe 06-04 452-7388-594.41-50 7,976.62
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP Shipping chgs-June 452-7388-594.42-10 5.82
Shipping chgs-June 452-7388-594.42-10 9.58
JORDAN EXCAVATING INC Contract pmt #1 pe 06-22 452-7388-594.65-10 189,753.84
WASHINGTON (DOH), STATE OF Review Project Report 452-7388-594.65-10 730.00
Review Project Report 452-7388-594.65-10 -730.00
Review Project Report 452-7388-594.65-10 730.00
Public Works-Water Water Projects Division Total: $201,761.27
Pubfic Works-Water Department Total: $201,761.27
Water Utility CIP Fund Total: $201,761.27
BROWN AND CALDWELL Prof svcs pe 05-21 453-7488-594.41-50 26,733.13
GEOTIVITY INC Prof svcs-May 453-7488-594.41-50 4,911.20
CSO Report-May 453-7488-594.41-50 605.92
NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES INC Prof svcs pe 06-20 453-7488-594.41-50 1,876.50
PARAMETRIX INC Prof svcs pe 05-28 453-7488-594.41-50 547.34
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Postage-Sperr 453-7488-594.42-10 5.34
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Wastewater Projects Division Total: $34,679.43
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: $34,679.43
WasteWater Utility CIP Fund Total: $34,679.43
PARAMETRIX INC Prof svcs pe 05-28 454-7588-594.41-50 16,054.25
Prof svcs pe 05-28 454-7588-594.41-50 14,920.73
Public Works-Solid Waste Solid Waste Coil Projects Division Total: $30,974.98
Public Works-Solid Waste Department Total: $30,974.98
Solid Waste Utility CIP Fund Total: $30,974.98
HElL ENVIRONMENTAL IND LTD AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-237.00-00 -46.77
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-237.00-00 -12.49
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-237.00-00 -23.72
PETTIT OIL COMPANY Diesel 501-0000-141.20-00 392.27
Gasoline 501-0000-141.20-00 5,642.03
Diesel 501-0000-141.20-00 4,986.91
29
Page 11
,~-~z Date: 7/14/04
~ City of Port Angeles
~ City Council Expenditure Report
'"" '~,.,~." r~ From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
PETTIT OIL COMPANY... Diesel 501-0000-141.20-00 2,404.90
Diesel 501-0000-141.20-00 2,403.94
Division Total: $15,747.07
Department Total: $15,747.07
BEN-KO-MATIC AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 660.63
BRYANT'S UPHOLSTERY EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.48-10 433.20
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.48-10 433.20
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.48-10 406.13
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.48-10 216.60
HElL ENVIRONMENTAL IND LTD AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 610.23
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 162.96
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 309.44
MURRAY MOTORS INC AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 175.01
OVERALL LAUNDRY SERVICES INC EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.49-90 64.15
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.49-90 53.62
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.49-90 0.37
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.49-90 53.25
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.49-90 0.54
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.49-90 53.08
PEN PRINT INC AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 101.26
PETTIT OIL COMPANY AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 61.53
PORT ANGELES FORD LINCOLN EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.48-10 86.64
SCHUCK'S AUTO PARTS AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 12.68
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 151.46
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 6.49
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 77.91
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 154.21
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 10.28
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 1.29
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 3.32
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 45.44
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 -45.44
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 84.99
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 8.51
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 6.10
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 38.77
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 27.76
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 68.22
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 15.54
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 17.98
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 -47.00
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 68.78
$0
Page 12
City of Port Angeles Date: 7/14/04
City Council Expenditure Report
c;~, From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
SCHUCK'S AUTO PARTS... AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 25.73
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 136.05
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 64.97
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 23.82
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 36.28
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 105.18
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 12.99
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2.36
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 -58.48
AUTO & TRUCK ACCESSORIES 501-7630-548.34-02 63.30
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2.05
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 1299
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 4.86
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 1.79
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 6.48
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 12.50
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 11.66
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 -11.66
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 12.99
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 132.30
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 7.90
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 27.02
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 35.74
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 -27.02
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 162.44
VERIZON WIRELESS 06-15 A/C 26421490800003 501-7630-548.42-10 45.88
WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTRIB INC AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 539.11
WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEM."AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.31-10 513.54
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 25.89
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.48-10 71.81
Pubfic Works-Equip Svcs Equipment Services Division Total: $6,589.60
Public Works-Equip Svcs Department Torah $6,589.60
Equipment Services Fund Total: $22,336.67
DUNGENESS COMMUNICATIONS INC WEB SITE MAINT. 502-2081-518.41-50 125.00
Finance Department Information Technologies Division Total: $125.00
Finance Department Department Total: $125.00
Information Technology Fund Total: $125.08
AWC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST July premium 503-1631-517.46-30 116,625.62
July premium 503-1631-517.46-30 1,810.67
July premium 503-1631-517.46-30 46.76
July premium 503-1631-517.46-30 36.74
July premium 3 ] 503-1631-517.46-30 5,272.80
Page 13
~. Date: 7/14/04
'~~ City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
'>'~'~' From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
AWC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST... July premium 503-1631-517.46-32 1,232.80
July premium 503-1631-517.46-32 278.25
BAILEY, JAMES A Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 114.00
BALSER, FRED Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 58.70
BALSER, SHARYN Disability Board-June 503-1631-517.46-35 177.50
BISHOP, VIRGIL Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 129.10
CAMERON, KENNETH Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 91.90
CAMPORINI, RICHARD Disability Board-June 503-1631-517.46-35 360.00
Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 65.60
CLELAND, MICHAEL A Disability Board-June 503-1631-517.46-35 728.50
FOX, KENNETH Disability Board-June 503-1631-517.46-35 2.04
GLENN, LARRY Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-163,1-517.46-35 58.70
GROOMS, MICHAEL Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 66.60
ILK, STEPHEN A Disability Board-June 503-1631-517.46-35 583.94
JOHNSON, DONALD G Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 66.60
JOHNSON, HARRY Disability Board-June 503-1631-517.46-35 116.25
Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 66.60
JORISSEN, ROBERT R Disability Board-June 503-1631-517.46-35 12.00
Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 58.70
LIND, DARWIN PETER Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 66.60
LINDLEY, JAMES K Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 54.00
LOUCKS, JASPER Disability Board-June 503-1631-517.46-35 20.67
Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 133.20
MIESEL JR, PHILIP C Disability Board-June 503-1631-517.46-35 120.00
Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 61.60
BARBARA MCFALL Medical reimbursement 503-1631-517.46-30 35.78
MORGAN, ROY Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 65.60
NW ADMIN TRANSFER ACCT July premium 503-1631-517.46-33 18,346.55
July premium 503-1631-517.46-33 21,701.40
July premium 503-1631-517.46-33 1,210.95
July premium 503-1631-517.46-34 10,877.65
SWEATT, JOHNNIE Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 65.70
THOMPSON, BRUCE Reimb Medicare Prem-July 503-1631-517.46-35 50.00
UNUM LIFE INS CO OF AMERICA I_/T' Disability-June 503-1631-517.46-31 2,180.75
Self Insurance Other Insurance Programs Division Total: $183,050.82
HEALTHCARE MGMT ADMNSTRS INC 06-29 Dental claims EFT 503-1637-517.46-01 2,782.10
Self Insurance Medical Benefits Division Total: $2,782.10
GATES SERVICE COMPANY, FRANK Workers' Comp-3rd Qtr 503-1661-517.41-40 2,500.00
Self Insurance Worker's Compensation Division Total: $2,500.00
NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES INC Cornerstone Replacement 503-1671-517.49-98 1,551.00
WCIA (WA CITIES INS AUTHORITY) Reimburse expense pmts 503-1671-517.41-50 2,583.69
Self Insurance Comp Liability Division Total: $4,134.69
32
Page 14
., c~.. Date: 7/14/04
? '~ City of Port Angeles
Expenditure Report
City
Council
"~.~;;' From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
Self Insurance Department Total: $192,467.61
Self-Insurance Fund Fund Total: $192,467,61
AWC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST July premium 602-6221-517.46-35 5,265.00
BRAUN, GARY Disability Board-June 602-6221-517.46-35 46.00
Reimb Medicare Prem-July 602-6221-517.46-35 66.60
CAMPBELL, MALCOLM D Reimb Medicare Prem-July 602-6221-517.46-35 65.60
EVANS, SIDNEY Disability Board-June 602-6221-517.46-35 43.00
Reimb Medicare Prem-July 602-6221-517.46-35 66.60
RYAN, ED Reimb Medicare Prem-July 602-6221-517.46-35 60.60
Fireman's Pension Fireman's Pension Division Total: $5,613.40
Fireman's Pension Department Total: $5,613.40
Firemen's Pension Fund Total: $5,613.413
ANDERSON, ALEX Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
ARAB, MICHELLE Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 400.00
BACA, YOLANDA Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
BALDWIN, PHILLIP H onoranum,expenses 652-8630-575.41-50 942.90
BERGER, DAVID Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
CONNER, ELIZABETH Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
GLYNN, GREGORY Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
HAYWARD, COLLEEN Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
INSIDE OUT MKTG & WEB SLTNS Pagewire hosting-July 652-8630-575.42-10 75.00
JACOBS, TOM Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
LABLOND, DANI Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
LAHTI, INGRID Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
LANDE, ALAN Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
LAPP, JAMES Honorarium,reimb exp 652-8630-575.41-50 810.07
LAW, CAROLYN Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
LILJELUND, DIANA Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
NECHAK, DAVID Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
QWEST 06-23 a/c 206T418577331B 652-8630-575.42-10 60.56
THURMAN SUPPLY Plumbing supplies 652-8630-575.31-01 17.51
Credit paint 652-8630-575.31-01 -12.87
Supplies 652-8630-575.31-20 83.82
TOMLINSON, RUTH Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
TOWNSEND COMMUNICATIONS INC Website forwarding 652-8630-575.42-10 5.00
WIEBE, SHIRLEY Honorarium 652-8630-575.41-50 300.00
Esther Webster/Fine Arts Esther Webster/Fine Arts Division Total: $6,881.99
Esther Webster/Fine Arts Department Total: $6,881.99
Esther Webster Fund Fund Total: $6,881.99
AFLAC July premium 920-0000-231.53-10 138.82
AFSCME LOCAL 1619 P/R deductions pe 07-04 920-0000-231.54-40 97.00
Page 15
'~ '6 City of Port Angeles Date: 7/14/04
City Council Expenditure Report
"~'.~ From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
AFSCME LOCAL 1619_. P/R deductions pe 07-04 920-0000-231.54-40 111.00
DIMARTINONVSCFF DISABILITY P/R deductions pe 07-04 920-0000-231.53-40 784.59
FIREFIGHTER'S LOCAL 656 P/R deductions pe 07-04 920-0000-231.54-30 1,349.00
IBEW LOCAL 997 P/R deductions pe 07-04 920-0000-231.54-20 568.50
WAYNE GROFF SUPP LIFE OVERPMT RFD 920-0000-231.53-30 30.60
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT P/R deductions pe 07-04 920-0000-231.56-20 169.85
P/R deductions pe 07-04 920-0000-231.56-20 1,643.39
PERS P/R Contribution pe 06-20 920-0000-231.51-11 3,228.05
POLICE ASSOCIATION P/R deductions pe 07-04 920-0000-231.55-10 242.00
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 589 P/R deductions pe 07-04 920-0000-231.54-10 2,616.00
UNITED WAY (PAYROLL) P/R deductions pe 07-04 920-0000-231.56-10 270.97
VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSOCIATION P/R deductions pe 07-04 920-0000-231.55-20 32.00
WSCCCE AFSCME AFL-CIO P/R deductions pe 07-04 920-0000-231.54-40 3,532.35
Division Total: $14,814.12
Department Total: $14,814.12
Payroll Clearing Fund Total: $14,814,12
Totals for check period From: 6/26/04 To: 7/9/04 $884,024.99
34
Page 16
Finance Department
Electronic Payments June 26, 2004 - July 9, 2004
Fund
501 06-01-04 Bank of NY Debt Service POR0230-0001 14,288.70
207 06-01-04 Bank of NY Debt Service POtL~NGI~F92 12,385.00
403 07-01-04 Public Works Board PW-5-91-280-047 143,777.09
160 07-01-04 Public Works Board PW-00-691-044 94,099.50
402 07-01-04 Public Works Board PW-00-691-045 64,748.42
402 07-01-04 Public Works Board PW-94-792-TIM-205 59,464.28
403 07-01-04 Public Works Board PW-5-93-280-038 50,266.66
105 07-01-04 Public Works Board PW-5-92-280-031 43,597.90
402 07-01-04 Public Works Board PW-5-95-791-028 14,903.28
105 07-01-04 Public Works Board PW-5-92-280-03 4,956.65
401 07-06-04 Energy NW Transmission - May 153,647.00
401 07-06-04 Energy NW Power Bill - May 948~659.00
Total 1,604,793.48
36
W A S H I N G T O N, U. $. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: July 20, 2004
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT: WHOLESALE WATER CONTRACT WITH CLALLAM PUD #1
Summary: Clallam PUD #1 has signed the wholesale water contract as proposed by the City.
This contract will be in effect until the last billing cycle in December 2005.
Recommendation: Approve and authorize the mayor to sign the attached contract.
Background/Analysis: The City and Clallam County PUD #1 have been working on a new
wholesale water contract since late in 2002. The PUD board of commissioners, at their July 8,
2004 meeting, approved the contract. The contract expires with the last billing cycle in
December 2005. City staff is attempting to set up a meeting with the PUD to discuss issues that
are in our common interest. Discussions concerning conditions for the next wholesale water
contract will be included in the agenda.
Changes to the contract since it was last reviewed by City Council are highlighted in gray in the
attached contract. The main changes include the following:
· The City and District have agreed to jointly participate in the development of a water
supply plan for the Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA 18) Watershed Management
Plan.
Any pre-annexation agreements signed by District customers will only be valid if a
sanitary sewer system is extended into the UGA area.
It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the mayor to sign the contract.
Attachment: Wholesale Water Contract
$7
PW_I01.01 [Revised 07/22/03]
WHOLESALE WATER CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF PORT ANGELES,
a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "City", and the PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
NO.1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY, a municipal co~oratio~., hereina~er calle~the "District".
WHEREAS, the City and the District realize certain mutual benefits from cooperative efforts
in the operation and maintenance of their respective water systems and desire to cooperate in
planning for the future supply of their customers; and
WHEREAS, the City's policy is tb~t the City's primary obligation is to supply water to current
and future City residents and businesses and that the District's purchase of City water is
thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above representations and the agreements set
forth below, the City agrees to deliver and sell to the District, and the District agrees to buy from
the City, wholesale water under the following provisions:
1. Rates and Water Use Limits.
A. The District shall pay the following rates:
Gales Addition Reservoir (High Zone):
Jan. 2003 - Dec. 2003 billing cycle- $0.94 per 100 cubic feet per month
Jan. 2004 - Dec. 2004 billing cycle- $1.00 per 100 cubic feet per month
Jan. 2005 - Dec. 2005 billing cycle- $1.05 per 100 cubic feet per month
Baker Street Intertie (Low Zone):
Jan. 2003 - Dec. 2003 billing cycle- $0.90 per 100 cubic feet per month
Jan. 2004 - Dec. 2004 billing cycle- $0.96 per 100 cubic feet per month
Jan. 2005 - Dec. 2005 billing cycle- $1.00 per 100 cubic feet per month
B. The maximum withdrawal rate from the City's water system at the Gales Addition reservoir
shall be 500 gallons per minute. The maximum withdrawal rate from the City's water system at
the Baker Street intertie shall be 175 gallons per minute. Short term changes to the withdrawal
rate may be made with the approval of the City.
C. The City shall have the unilateral option to adjust the rates described above upon 30 days
notice, if rates are changed for other City customers.
2. Other Conditions.
A. The District agrees to manage its water system to stabilize demand on the City's system.
The District has in existence a water shortage response plan for its water systems within the
County and will maintain and update its plan as conditions warrant. In the event of water supply
or capacity problems in the City's water delivery system, the District shall implement its water
shortage response plan within the Urban Growth Area east of Port Angeles upon notification by
the City.
B. The District agrees to continue to investigate and develop other feasible sources to supply
water to the area serviced by this contract for the Eastern Port Angeles Urban Growth Area.
C The District and the City shall cooperate to the maximum extent l~ossible by jointly
participating in water system capital ~mprovement projects , of mutual
benefit.
D. The District agrees to reimburse the City for 95% of the costs for maintaining the
transmission line between the City limits and the Gales Addition reservoir.
E. The District agrees to construct all new and replacement facilities within the Eastern Port
Angeles Urban Growth Area to a standard that meets or exceeds the City's urban services
standards and guidelines.
F. In case of emergency, water shortage, or whenever the public health, safety, or the
distribution of water so demands, the City may reduce or limit the time for, or temporarily
discontinue, delivery of water to the District. Water delivery may also be temporarily interrupted
for the purposes of making repairs, extension, or doing other necessary work. Before altering the
delivery of water to the District, the City will attempt to notify the District, in advance, of any
changing, reducing, limiting, or interruption of service. However, the City shall not be
responsible for any damage resulting from interruption, change, or failure of the water supply
system from any cause.
G. The water purchased by the District shall be for the customers served by the District in
the Eastern Port Angeles Urban Growth Area. The District agrees to obtain the prior approval of
the City when any new customer or combination of new customers of the District are projected to
increase the District's monthly water usage under this contract for both points of delivery by
50,000 cubic feet in any month. The District also agrees to obtain the prior approval of the City
when its total water usage under this Contract is projected to exceed 2.5 million cubic feet in any
month.
H. The City's policy shall be, and the District hereby agrees, that all new and existing
customers inside the City have priority over the District for use of City water and that the City
may, at its sole discretion, reduce the delivery of water to the District in order to better supply
City customers or may terminate this Contract upon 60 days written notice as set forth in
paragraph 5 below.
I. All water supplied under this Contract, after it passes the point of delivery at the present
service connections, shall be the property of the District. The District shall be responsible for all
monitoring and reporting requirements to comply with the Safe Drinking Water Act.
J. The City shall not be liable for any loss or damage to any person or property, whatsoever,
resulting directly or indirectly from the use by the District or its customers of the water supplied
under this Contract, and the City shall further not be liable for any interruptions in supply of
water to the District or its customers from any cause whatsoever. The District agrees to
indemnify the City for, and save it harmless from, all losses or damages which the City may
suffer or incur by reason of the assertion of any such claim against the City, including all fees,
costs, expenses, and attorney fees incurred in defending against such claims.
K. The District agrees to allow the City to use access roads and the District's bridge across
Morse Creek for access to City facilities. The District also agrees to maintain three phase electric
service for backup emergency service to the City's Elwha River pump station and any associated
facilities.
3. Payment.
Billings for services rendered shall be paid by the District monthly, and in the event the
District fails to receive a monthly billing, such failure shall not release the District from liability
for payment. The billing, payment, and collection of this contract shall be as specified in the
City's Utility Accounts Ordinance, Chapter 13.16 PAMC.
4. Pre-annexation agreement
By Ordinance No.3082, the Port Angeles City Council has established a policy of allowing the
extension of City utility services into its urban growth areas without annexation at the sole
discretion of the City Council. The policy of the Washington State Growth Management Act is
that urban growth areas should eventually be incorporated into cities. In support of these policies,
the City Council requires that all new water service property owners using the City's wholesale
water (including first time customers, customers that increase their service size, and new
purchasers of property with existing water service) shall execute, record, and provide a copy to
the City of a pre-annexation agreement in the form of the attached Agreement for Water Service
before water service is provided or continued. The form of the attached Agreement for Water
Service maybe chan~ed upon written ~tification by. the Cit~ to ~e PUD.
In order to implement the above mentioned policies, the District shall ensure that the
following requirements are met. The District shall inform all property owners in the Eastern Port
Angeles Urban Growth Area that the City is providing wholesale water based on plans for
eventual annexation of the property to the City of Port Angeles. The District shall provide the
attached Agreement for Water Service to all new water customers, customers requesting an
increase in the size of their water service, and new purchasers of property, before providing or
continuing water service to them using the City's wholesale water. The Agreement for Water
Service shall be executed by the property owner and submitted to the City for approval of the
water service. The property owner shall pay for all of its costs and fees associated with
complying with and recording the Agreement for Water Service. The District shall not provide or
continue water service to the property before receiving a letter of authorization from the City
stating that all requirements of the City have been met.
5. Termination.
This Contract shall terminate with the last billing cycle in December, 2005, or upon 60 days
written notice by either party, whichever is earlier, unless extended by written agreement of the
parties.
DATED this __ day of__.,2004 (effective date).
CITY OF PORT ANGELES PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NLIMBER 1
OF CLALLAM COUNTY
Richard Headrick, Mayor W.E. Purser, President
ATTEST: ATTEST
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk Hugh E. Simpson Jr., Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attomey
AFTER RECORDING RETURN DOCUMENT TO:
City of Port Angeles
Public Works and Utilities. Department
P.O. Box 1150 * 321 East Fifth Street
Port Angeles. WA 98362
I Reserved for Recording Purposes Only I
DOCUMENT TITLE: Agreement for Water Service
REFERENCE NUMBER OF RELATED DOCUMENT:
GRANTOR(S):
ADDITIONAL GRANTORS ON PAGE OF DOCUMENT.
GRANTEE(S):
ADDITIONAL GRANTEES ON PAGE OF DOCUMENT.
ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
ADDITIONAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON PAGE(S) OF
DOCUMENT.
ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S):
AGREEMENT FOR WATER SERVICE
The CITY OF PORT ANGELES, a first class municipal corporation of the State of Washington
(hereinafter the "City"), and (Name) . (Street Address)
(Parcel Number) (hereinafter the "Property Owner"), in consideration of the
mutual covenants set forth herein, agree as follows:
1. PURPOSE: The Port Angeles City Council, by Ordinance No. 3082 has authorized the
extension of City services into the Urban Growth Area, and the Property Owner will be
consuming City wholesale water. The approval to consume water through the conveyance system
of the Clallam County Public Utilitiesy District # 1 is subject to certain conditions, and this
Agreement is entered into to describe those conditions.
2. PROPERTY SERVED: The property serviced which is the subject of this Agreement, is
described as follows;
located in Clallam County, State of Washington.
3. ANNEXATION: The property owner understands that the City contemplates annexing
the property served herein. Accordingly, the property owner agrees to sign any and all notices,
petitions and other documents requested at any time by the City leading to the annexation of the
property to the City of Port Angeles. THE PROPERTY OWNER DOES NOT WAIVE ANY
APPLICABLE RIGHT TO VOTE IN AN ANNEXATION ELECTION OR TO PARTICIPATE
IN ANY ANNEXATION REVIEW PROCEDURES PROVIDED BY STATUTE.
For those property owners residing in the Eastem UGA, the City of Port Angeles and Clallam
County PUD #1 have agreed to an additional condition that this pre-annexation agreement will
be valid only if a sanitary sewer system is installed to provide service to the UGA.
4. GOVERNING LAW: This agreement is subject to all statutes and regulations of the
United States and the State of Washington and ordinances and policies of the City of Port
Angeles, relating to the provision of utility service by a municipal provider. Wholesale water
rates for supply provided through the Clallam County Public Utility District #1 outside of the
City Limits are set by contract.
5. TERM; MODIFICATION; TERMINATION:
5.1 This agreement shall be in effect until it is modified or terminated as provided by this
section.
5.2 This agreement may be modified by written agreement of the parties at any time with
approval of the Port Angeles City Council; such modifications are effective on recordation.
5.3 This agreement may be terminated upon:
5.3.1 Annexation of the Property into the City; PROVIDED that any provision in this
agreement requiring a waiver of rights to protest the formation of an LID shall continue in effect
until the property owner duly executes a separate agreement to that effect pursuant to RCW
35.43.182.
5.3.2 Termination of the wholesale water contract with Clallam County Public Utility
District #1.
5.3.3 Breach of any provision of this agreement.
5.3.4 Sale of the property, in which event the new owner will be required to sign its
own 'Agreement for Water Service".
5.3.5 If the sanitary sewer is not installed.
6. QUALITY OF SERVICE:
6.1 The City agrees to provide the Clallam County Public Utility District #1 with wholesale
water supply in such quantities and quality as determined by contract.
6.2 The City shall use reasonable diligence to provide wholesale water to the Clallam County
Public Utility District #1 but shall not be liable for damages, breach of contract or otherwise for
failure, suspension, or diminution of service occasioned by or in consequence of any cause
beyond the control of the City administration, including but not limited to acts of God or of the
public enemy, fires, floods, earthquakes or other catastrophes, strikes or failure or breakdown of
transmission facilities, or policies or ordinances enacted by the City Council.
EXECUTED, this the __ day of ,2004
Property Owner
EXECUTED, this the day of , 2004, for the CITY OF PORT ANGELES:
46
pORT NGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: JULY 20, 2004
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT: Household Hazardous Waste Collection Event
Summary: The City is being requested to participate in the annual Household Hazardous Waste
Collection Event that is sponsored by Clallam County Environmental Health & Human Services
(Clallam County) and the Department of Ecology (DOE). DOE pays 75% of the costs and Clallam
County bills the balance of the cost according to participation percentages. The Solid Waste
Division budget includes funds to cover the anticipated City share.
Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to sign the 2004 agreement with Clallam County to
provide a maximum of $6,000 toward the cost of the Household Hazardous Waste Collection
Event.
Background/Analysis: Clallam County sponsors the above referenced collection days with
supplemental funding from DOE. The event is scheduled for September 24 and 25, Friday and
Saturday, at the Wal-Mart parking lot. Grant funding from DOE pays 75% of the total cost of the
event, which is approximately $59,000. The City share of the balance historically has been
approximately 33% of the households bringing hazardous waste to the event.
Clallam County Environmental Health & Human Services has requested our participation in this
event in an amount not to exceed $6,000 for in-kind services and/or cash. In 2003 the City received
credit for $1,282 of in-kind services and paid $2,818 in cash for a total cost of $4,100. The Solid
Waste Division budget includes funds for this annual event.
Attachment: HHW2003 Agreement
N :\CCOLrNCIL~FINAL~hazardouswaste2004.wpd 4 7
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this __ day of ,2004, between CLALLAM COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of Washington, and the CITY OF PORT ANGELES, a municipal
corporation.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the County and the City of Port Angeles desire to jointly sponsor a household
hazardous waste collection event which tentatively is scheduled for September 24th and 25th, 2004 in Port
Angeles, and September 26th, 2004 in Sequim; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into an agreement setting forth their respective
responsibilities;
NOW, THEREFORE, in mutual consideration of the promises contained herein, the parties agree
as follows:
1. Clallam County shall be responsible for the organization, promotion, education, collection
and disposal of the hazardous waste collection event and the waste collected.
2. The City of Port Angeles agrees to contribute up to six thousand ($6,000) in costs
associated with event staffing, publicity and waste management and disposal of waste collected; provided
further, that the County shall provide documentation of the costs associated with the event including, but
not limited to, organization, promotion, education, collection and disposal and shall provide the City of Port
Angeles with such documentation, whereupon the City shall pay its financial contribution hereunder to the
Clallam County Department of Health and Human Services within thirty (30) days of receipt of the
documentation.
3. Clallam County agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City of Port Angeles, its elected
and appointed officers and employees harmless from and against any claim, demand, judgment, cost or
expense, including reasonable attorney fees, because of personal or bodily injury, including death at any
time resulting therefrom, sustained by any person(s), or property damage arising from Clallam County's
negligence in the performance of its duties hereunder.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Name Stephen P. Tharinger (Chair)
Title
Date
ATTEST:
Trish Perrott, Clerk of the Board
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
C~ISTOPHER MELLY
Chief Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
for Clallam County
pORTAN EL,E'S
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
])ATE: July 20, 2004
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Brad Collins, Community ~.opment Director ~
Dan McKeen, Fire Chief
Subject: Adoption of 2003 Washington State Building Code
SUMMARY: The 2003 Washington State Legislature enacted SHB 1734, updating the state
building code. This legislation becomes effective in July of 2004. The state building code will be
comprised of the 2003 editions of the International Building Code, the International Fire Code,
the International Mechanical Code, the International Residential Code and the Uniform Plumbing
Code, with state amendments. The Port Angeles Municipal Code needs to be modified to reflect
these changes.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached ordinance
that adopts the new state building code with state amendments, the updated appendices as well as
accompanying language that enables the appropriate changes to the Port Angeles Municipal
Code.
Background: The codes we use are considered "Model Codes." Model codes have been
developed over the years through a consensus process. Once these codes were developed, they
eliminated the need for states and communities to craft their own local code. An additional
advantage of the model codes is that they provide uniformity between jurisdictions.
For decades, most of the western states have adopted the "Uniform Codes." These codes were
developed over the years by the Western Fire Chief's Association and the International
Conference of Building Officials. The southern states have used the "Standard Codes" and the
eastern states have used the "National Codes."
Although the codes were roughly similar, there has always been some confusion generated by the
fact that different regions of the country used different codes. Many companies that built
buildings throughout the country - an example would be McDonalds - were frustrated by the
need to build to different standards depending upon where they were.
49
City Council
Page 2
July 20, 2004
In 1994, the International Code Council (ICC) was formed in order to publish a single set of
codes that would be used throughout the United States. After years of politics, revisions and
compromise, the ICC has finally published the "International Codes."
Washington State, as well as most of the states in the country, a notable exception is California,
have all decided to adopt the International Codes. Pursuant to Ch. 19.27 RCW, the 2003 edition
of the International Codes, as adopted by the State of Washington, will apply to all cities,
including the City of Port Angeles, effective July 1, 2004; therefore, it is appropriate to amend
the Port Angeles Municipal Code to adopt the International Codes and the 2003 Uniform
Plumbing Code with local amendments and updated appendices and to make other housekeeping
amendments to reference the International Codes. As a practical matter, Port Angeles is obligated
to adopt the International Codes.
We propose that the City of Port Angeles follow the state lead and adopt the following codes:
2003 International Building Code
2003 International Fire Code
2003 International Residential Code
2003 International Mechanical Code
2003 Uniform Plumbing Code
The code adoption process allows for states and jurisdictions to amend the codes as long as the
amendment does not result in a reduction in the level of protection. The Washington State
Building Code Council (SBCC) issues amendments to the codes for jurisdictions in the state. We
recommend adopting the amendments to the International Codes as proposed by the SBCC.
For the most part, the changeover from the Uniform Codes to the International Codes will go
unnoticed by most citizens. When the International Code Council met to develop the new code,
they largely modeled the new code after Uniform Codes.
For example, some of the chapters in the International Fire Code have been moved and
renumbered and there are changes to some definitions and some classifications. The City of Port
Angeles has not made any amendments beyond those proposed by the State Building Code
Council.
A number of informational sessions have been sponsored throughout the region in order to
outline the major changes and revisions to the codes. These sessions have been presented for the
benefit of the local homebuilders and trade associations.
Projects started prior to the date of adoption of the International Codes will be governed by
Uniform Codes, unless mutually agreed upon otherwise by the developer and the City.
5O
City Council
Page 3
July 20, 2004
At this time, City staff is proposing a modification to the existing fire sprinkler ordinance,
providing a subsidy for fire sprinkler installations in multi-family dwellings. This proposal will
provide a $200 rebate per unit for the cost of fire sprinkler installation in multi-family buildings,
for a total of up to 15 units per building. There will be a $3000 maximum rebate per multi-family
building.
The provision stops at 15 because the Building Code requires the sprinklers beyond that point.
Our intent is to provide a rebate only in those cases where the PAMC is more restrictive than the
Building Code.
52
Some Quick Facts the About the New International Codes
Washington State and the City of Port Angeles join over 570 other state and local
jurisdictions that have adopted the International Codes.
Both the Building Industry Association of Washington (BIAW) and the National
Association of Hornebuilders (NAHB) st'~pport the adoption of the International Codes.
Probably the single most visible change is the addition of the International Residential
Code. The International Residential Code applies to one and two-family dwellings and
town homes that are not more than 3 stories in height. All other construction is covered
under the International Building Code.
In addition to the International Codes, the State of Washington will continue to utilize the
Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electrical Code and the State Energy Code - as has
been the case for many years.
The adoption of the new codes will not affect permit fees. The determination of fee
schedules is left up to each jurisdiction.
Under the Uniform Codes, the City of Port Angeles was considered to be in Seismic Zone
"3." In the International Codes we have been placed in a seismic zone is that is referred
to as "D2." Obviously there has not been a major geologic change in the past two
months, but the new codes do reflect a more conservative construction approach based
upon past seismic history. What does this mean locally?
Reinforcing steel in foundations will be upgraded
Foundation footings will now be stronger
Wall bracing will be more substantial
Under the International Codes, some fire separations between commercial and mixed
occupancies have become stricter, however the allowable height and area of the buildings
has increased slightly.
For the most part, the majority of construction within the City of Port Angeles is
residential and commercial light frame construction. The new International Code will
have minimal impacts upon this type of construction and the new code should be easy to
adapt to.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
adopting the 2003 editions of the International Building,
Mechanical, Fire and Residential Codes, the 2003 Uniform
Plumbing Code, the Washington State Energy Code, the 2003
National Electrical Code with State amendments and updated
appendices as specified and amending Ordinance 2995 as
amended and Chapters 14 and 18 of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Ordinance 2995 as amended and Chapter 14 of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code are hereby amended by amending PAMC 14.01.010 to read as follows:
14.01.010 Constmcti on Codes Defined. Building construction within the City of Port
Angeles shall be governed by the following listed codes, laws, and ordinances, as adopted and
amended in Title 14 PAMC, which shall be collectively known as the construction codes of
the City of Port Angeles:
~ ~,,. ,~,~,,,,~ ,_,~,~,,~; ,~,,,~,. The 2003 International Building Code;
~ ~,,. ,_,~,~,~. ~v~,~,.~,,~,..~, ,.~,,,~,. The 2003 International Mechanical Code;
~ ,j~ ,_,~.~,~ ~.~,~ ,.~,,,~,, The 2003 International Fire Code;
D. The 2003 International Residential Code
DE. ""-- ' '--~'~' ...... ' ..... '-:--- '"- ~ - The 2003 Uniform Plumbing Code;
tS_F. The Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code;
FG._=. The Washington State Energy Code;
OH__:. The Uniform Sign Code;
t-}I_. The Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings;
l J_. The National Electrical Code and the State Electrical Laws;
:[K. National Electrical Safety Code;
Y~_. The Washington State Historical Building Code;
EM. Stand-Alone Construction Ordinances, as adopted by the Port Angeles City
Council and as approved by the Washington State Building Code Council
when required by State law.
-1-
Section 2. Ordinance 2995 as amended and Chapter 14.03 of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code are hereby amended by amending PAMC 14.03.010 and 14.03.020 to read
as follows:
14.03.010 .....~ ........ ~ ........
,~.,,~,,, ,_.,~u~ ~-m,t~- Construction Codes Adopted. Pursuant to
Chapters 19.27 and 19.27A RCW and Title 51 WAC, the following Codes are adopted:
buojc~,t to UI¢ dlll¢llt.lllllDllLb bet lUll. II Ill I
~XIp, n Ut
~UU¢ ~UUlI~II OIJU ~UUJJblIUU ~ ~lla~tUI JJ-JU VVfiDIIIII~LUII ~UJJHJIIDLIflLJV~ ~U~ e
~temational Building Code, published by the ~temational Code Council, as amended by the
Washington State Building Code Council and published as Chapter 51-50 Washington
Administrative Code, except as amended in Chapter 14.03 PAMC;
I JIGLJIIJIUIIII IVIGL, JIO-JIJL~O-I
AppciiuJA ~ pUUJJbIIGU u~ tllU JIILUIIIdUUJIdl CUlllUlCllb¢ UI DUJJUIII[ Ulll~l~lb dIIU tll~
.................... The International Mechanical Code, published by the International
Code Council, as amended by the Washington State Building Code Council and filed as
Chapter 51-52 Washington Administrative Code;
C. I 11~ IdllllUllll 1'11~., k.,LltlG, 1 727 / ~IUUII ~JIU UIIIlOlIII l'llU CUUU OL~II~ I ~ I
~1-~ VVdbllJll[tUIJ~UJJJJIJJbU~UVC
m ~,~p~ .~.~, ~,,~, The International Fire Code, published by the International Code
Council, as amended by the Washington State Building Code Council and filed as Chapter
51-54 Washington Administrative Code, except as amended in Chapter 14.21 PAMC;
D. The International Residential Code, published by the International Code Council, as
amended by the Washington State Building Code Council and filed as Chapter 51-51
Washington Administrative Code;
D.E Tn~, UIIIIUIIII 17 JUIJIUJII[ k..UU~, 1.77 I I-~U. JLJUJI~ O.110. IdllllUllll .[JUJJJUJJI[ L, UHG
I~Yl I~UJLIUII~ lJUUIIbIJCLIv tllG llltGlilO-tlUlltal /-3, bbUL, ldtlUll UI _rlUIJJUJII~ ClIIU iYl~;~L~ll(llllk,{ll
OlllL. IO. lb~ ~1.~ (IlII~DIIUC. LI UdV LII~D ¥¥ ~l. blllll~tUll OLaLLID DUIILIlII~ %~ULIG %..,UUIIL, II O. IILI IIIC, LL ab
~11-/U VT' O. blIIII~LUII 2-XUIIIIIIIbLIClLI ¥~
-2-
54
The Uniform Plumbing Code, 2003 Edition, and Uniform Plumbing Code Standards,
2003 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical
Officials, as amended by the Washington State Building Code Council and filed as Chapter
51-56 Washington Administrative Code;
EF. The Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code, as adopted by the
Washington State Building Code Council and filed as Chapter 51-13 Washington
Administrative Code;
FG. The Washington State Energy Code, 1997 Second Edition, as amended by the
Washington Building Code Council, and filed as Chapter 51-11 Washington Administrative
Code.
GH. The Uniform Sign Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference of
Building Officials;
HI_. The Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 Edition,
published by the International Conference of Building Officials:
lJ. The Uniform Code for Building Conservation, 1997 Edition, published by the
International Conference of Building Officials;
:~K. The Washington State Historic Building Code, First Edition, published by the
Washington State Building Code Council as Chapter 51-19 Washington Administrative Code.
Iii cas~ u~ ~.umm.~ aii~oiig uJ~ ~.uu~ ~.umm.~aL~.u m ~uu~.uu,~ uuuulsu ~, u~ u,~
L. The Uniform Building Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International Conference
of Building Officials, for the limited purpose to enforce the Uniform Code for the Abatement
of Dangerous Buildings referenced above.
M. The Uniform Mechanical Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International
Conference of Building Officials, for the limited purpose to enforce the Uniform Code for the
Abatement of Dangerous Buildings referenced above.
1%.~ ¥¥ · J,'~ / .VUV[...YJ tallU ~.~'J, CIlIU. I l"kl¥19 1 ~l'.V'-i'.Uz-V, I. ll~, IUIIU YY 111[ fllIIUIIU. III~III.i) kU tll~, UIIIIUI 111
UI. IIIUIII~ '*..,UU.U, UIIIIUIIII I II.IIIIUIII~ ~,..,UU~,, dllt. l UIIIIUIIII O1~11 9U~-.I[., O. lb
-3-
LIIU VI fl311lll~tUll OLflt¢ U~pOltlllUllt UI OU~lfll allO ll~flltll OUl VlCUD IUI lllOlU tllall llVk,
_*:__-*-J 1 ........ 1-- J_*_-i:-.- l___:___ :__-i--ll-J --- 1__~1- -Il-- -g --:J p ' ~
a~civ~t~u u~ ~llJU~g UULU~LJUII UUYIbU~ llJb[allUU UII UULII bIU~ UI ~QIU 0 ~i~ii~ S~ llla~ 10~
OU~LIUll I ~
R .... :-'-~ ............ ~--:':':-- -'--' be .... ~ .... ~.__, ......... ~ ......... ,- ~----,---, ...., .....
UIIIIUIIII OU~tiOll JUI m 1~ gIIIClIUUU U~ flUUIII~ LII~ IUIIU~III[_
-4-
.)/-,Ud. 1 UI I. ll~ k/lllll.}llll Dtlllt. llll~ ka~.Jklg,~ I 7.7 I 13kl. ll-l~dll~ ~llflll apply t~../Idl~dJg,~,~,l~)ll Idl bl~ll~.
14.03.020 Amendments to International Codes. Pursuant to RCW 19.27.040,
RCW 19.27.060(3) and (4), and PAMC 14.04.020, the following amendments to the
International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, and Uniform Sign Code are
adopted:
A._~_. International Building Code, Chapter 5, Table 503 is amended by adding the
following footnote:
(9) Type V-B construction prohibited in CBD - Central Business District.
B_.~_. International Building Code, Section 903.2.10 is amended by adding the
following:
903.2.10.4 Automatic sprinklers shall be provided:
(a) In all buildings where the floor area exceeds 6,250 square feet on all floors;
(b) In any adult family home, boarding home, or group care facility_ that is licensed by
the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services for more than five
persons;
However, the height and area increases specified in Section 504 and 506 (for
sprinklers) shall be permitted.
For the purpose of this subsection, portions of buildings separated from the rest of the
building, in accordance with Section 705, with openings allowed by the International
Building Code protected by the installation of approved magnetic hold-open devices
which are activated by smoke detection devices installed on both sides of said
openings, may be considered as separate buildings.
C. Uniform Sign Code, Chapter 3, Section 301, is amended by adding the
following: Provided, that presently existing signs not in conformi _ty with this code, as
amended, may be maintained in their present condition unless hazardous, but may not
be altered or reconstructed unless in conformity with this code.
D.~_. Uniform Sign Code, Chapter 3, Section 303' Delete #3, signs less than 6 feet
above grade.
E.~_. Uniform Sign Code, Chapter 4, delete Table 4-B. In lieu thereof, Chapter 32,
Section 3205.1 of the Uniform Building Code, 1997 Edition, shall apply to projection
of signs.
57
Section 3. Ordinance 2995 as amended and Chapter 14 of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code are hereby amended by amending PAMC 14.21.010 to read as follows:
14.21.010 Adoption of International Fire Code, Appendices. There is adopted by the
Ci~ Council for the pu¢ose of prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life
and prope~ from fire or explosion, that ce~ain Code ~own as the International Fire Code,
including Appendices A, B, C, D, E, F and G, published by the ~temational Code
Conference as amended by the Washington State Building Code Council. In the case of any
conflict be~een the Appendices adopted by this section and any other ordinance that
addresses a specific requirement covered by the appendices, the other specific ordinance shall
control.
Section 4. Ordinance 2995 as amended and Chapter 18 of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code are hereby amended by amending PAMC 18.08.110 D. to read as follows:
18.08.110 - Fire Suppression Requirements.
A. All single-family residences and duplexes shall either be located within a four
minute response time from a City of Port Angeles fire station or shall meet the following fire
suppression requirements:
1. Each single-family residence and duplex outside the four minute
response time, except for residences within new sub-d/visions as provided for in subsection
A2, shall have either of the following:
a. a residential sprinkler system that is installed and maintained
in accordance with Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) standards, for which the City will provide a $500 rebate for the cost of installation,
provided that said rebate shall be subject to annual review by the City Council; or
b. an outside alarm bell that is electronically connected to the
residential smoke alarm system in accordance with the requirements of the Fire Chief or
designee.
2. Each single-family residence and duplex within a new subdivision
outside the four minute response time shall be equipped with a residential sprinkler system
that is installed and maintained in accordance with Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and National
58
-6-
Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards, provided that such subdivisions shall be
allowed to have the following reduced standards for cul-de-sac size and fire hydrant spacing:
a. cul-de-sac diameter measured from curb to curb may be reduced
from the normal 100 feet standard to either 90 feet or, if the cul-de-sac is restricted and posted
for no parking, to 80 feet; and
b. distance between fire hydrants may be increased from the
normal standard of 500 feet average spacing between hydrants to not more than 1,000 feet.
3. Each new single-family residence and duplex in areas that do not have
water system infrastructure improvements meeting City standards and that are outside the four
minute response time shall have either of the following:
a. a fire hydrant within 1000 feet of the furthest point of the
structure, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building; or
b. an approved residential sprinkler system, adequate clearance to
expose structures, and compliance with the defensible space requirements prescribed in the
current IFCI Urban-Wildland Interface Code.
4. The fire flow requirement shall be either of the following:
a. 500 gallons per minute for new single family dwellings less
than 3600 square feet; or
b. 1000 gallons per minute for new single family dwellings larger
than 3600 square feet.
B. All multi-family residential developments shall have automatic sprinkler
systems as set forth in Chapter 14.26 PAMC.
C. The requirements of this section shall apply only to newly constructed
residential buildings and reconstruction of residential buildings to an extent that exceeds
seventy-five percent (75%) of the existing assessed value of the building.
D. In addition to providing a $500 rebate under PAMC 18.08.110A for the cost of
installing sprinkler systems in residences outside the four minute response time, in newly
constructed or reconstructed homes, the Ci_ty will also provide a $500 rebate for the cost of
voluntarily installing sprinkler systems in single family residences and duplexes anywhere
within the Ci _ry. The Ci_ty will also provide a $200 rebate per unit for the cost of fire sprinkler
installation in multi-family buildings, for a total of up to 15 units per building. There will be
a $3000 maximum rebate per multi-family building.
Section 5. The City Clerk, as official reviser of the City, is hereby authorized to
change, where appropriate, all references to the appropriate Uniform Codes to the appropriate
International Codes.
59
Section 6. Severability. If any provisions of this Ordinance or its applications to any
person or circumstances is held to be invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance or application
of the provisions of the Ordinance to other persons or circumstances is not affected.
Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after the date of
publication.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the day of July, 2004.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary
G :~Legal_B ackup\ORDINANCES&RESOLUTI ON Sk2004-11-1nt-BuildingCode.ord.wpd
60
pORZANC. E:LE:,S,
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CiTY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: JULY 15, 2004
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL QUINN, CITY MANAGEI~~-
SUBJECT: ADJUSTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC BASIC MONTHLY CHARGE
I summary: As part of the City's commitment to operating efficiencies and streamlining theI
impact of regulations upon our municipal customers, an adjustment to the applicability and processI
of our industrial transmission electric basic monthly charge is proposed. I
Recommendation: Adopt the attached ordinance.
Background/Analysis: Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) 13.12.071 authorizes an
electric rate for those entities that draw power at the transmission voltage as an industrial user. One
component of this rate is the Monthly Basic Charge which is generally a coverage of administrative
and overhead cost allocations and not a consumptive component of the rate. It is a flat amount of
$5,870 per month; and it is charged to only one customer - Nippon Paper Industries (NP1).
Staff proposes to waive the fee for the remainder of 2004 and annually review the fee applicability
with Council concurrence as part of the City's utility rate analysis. Our justification is:
1. Compliance with Resolution 8-04 adopted 5/4/04 reaffirming the City's commitment to
NPI to pursue operational efficiencies, reduce regulations, and encourage private sector investment.
2. Support of our community's largest industrial customer and employer.
3. Prior precedent from 10/01 - 9/02 for waiver of this charge in response to the BPA rate
increases at the time to our rate base.
4. Current receipts for power purchases are ahead of budget projections, thus the waiver of
this charge has no significant negative impact.
5. The fee is annually reviewed and evaluated by the City Manager and incorporated into the
annual review of the Budget and the Utility Rates.
6. NPI has endured significant increases in industrial transmission costs since the Federal
Government has obtained the Elwha Dam generating facilities for power.
6]
G:YMASTFORM\COUNCIL.WPT
62
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
amending the provisions relating to the basic monthly charge
paid by Nippon Paper Industries, Inc. for industrial transmission.
and revising Ordinance 3145 and Section 13.12.071 of the Port
Angeles Municipal Code.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN
as follows:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 3145 and PAMC Section 13.12.071 are hereby amended to
read as follows:
13.12.071 Schedule IT-03 - Industrial Transmission.
A. Applicability. This schedule applies to all accounts where power is taken at
transmission voltage.
B. Character of Service. Service to be furnished under this schedule is unregulated
three phase sixty cycle, alternating current at transmission voltage, 69 KV nominal.
C. Point of Delivery_: Service under this schedule shall be provided and measured
where the customer's facilities interconnect with the facilities of the City and the Bonneville Power
Administration.
D. Service Policy: Service under this schedule is subject to the Customer Service
Policies of the City.
E. Rate:
1. Monthly Basic Charge
Daishowa Ai~icrica Co. LTDNippon Paper Industries, Inc.: $5,870/month,
provided that the monthly basic charge shall not be in effect from July 1, 2004 to December 31,
2004. Thereafter, the Basic Charge shall be established annually by the City Manager as part of the
City's annual budget process.
2. Energy Charges: The average monthly wholesale cost of energy to the
Port Angeles Electric Utility times the measured KWH.
3. Demand Charge: the average monthly wholesale cost of demand to Port
Angeles City Light times the customer one-hour peak.
4. Other Charges: Any other power or transmission charges will be billed
at the wholesale rate charged to Port Angeles City Light times the proportional share serving the
industrial customer.
5. Reactive Power Charge:
Reactive Energy: Proportional share of total City charges for lagging
reactive energy during HLH and leading reactive energy during LLH.
Reactive Demand: Proportional share of total City charges for lagging
- 1 -
63
reactive demand during HLH and leading reactive demand during LLH.
Reactive ratchet demand: Any reactive demand ratchet established while
a customer of City Light are due until the ratchet is retired. 6. Other Charges:
7. Taxes: Utility and other taxes will be added to customer bills such that
they recover the actual tax obligation of the Utility and City.
Section 2. All other sections and provisions of PAMC Chapter 13.12 are hereby ratified
and confirmed.
Section 3 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days following the date
of its publication by summary. -
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the __ day of July, 2004.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary
G:~Leg,,l_B~kup\OKDIN ANCES&ILESOL UTIONS'O-01~4-1 0. wPd
JuLy 12, 2004
-2-
p:O'R N"G EL, ES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CiTY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: JULY 14, 2004
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Timothy J. Smith, Economic Development Direc
SUBJECT: Development Agreement; Green Crow Campbell Avenue Subdivision and
proposed Planned Residential Development
Summary_: In an effort to bring forward a proposed Green Crow Campbell Ave residential
development, the City has negotiated a Development Agreement with Green Crow as authorized by
State statute. The proposed agreement provides for the City and Green Crow to share in the
improvement to public infrastructure in a broad area both onsite and offsite of the proposed
development. Completion of the proposed onsite improvements and homes within the Green Crow
Campbell Ave 45 acre development would increase the City's tax base by substantially increasing the
assessed value of the property. The offsite improvements solve significant existing deficiencies
regarding sewer infrastructure North of the proposed project. The project as envisioned and
implemented through the proposed Development Agreement would be the City's first candidate for
the NICE Neighborhoods Program as adopted by City Council in April 2004.
Recommendation: We recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Development
Agreement with Green Crow for their Campbell Ave Subdivision and proposed Planned
Residential Development.
Background: Last year the City adopted a package of"low-impact" development standards in an
effort to draw more residential development into the Port Angeles city limits. During the public review
process for the revised standards, Green Crow expressed general support for adoption of the low-
impact standards and advised the City to consider additional factors that would further leverage the
City's goal to attract residential development investment, especially for certain areas within the City.
Following the adoption ofthe"low-impact standards, staff.met with representatives from Green Crow
and began an in-depth dialog relative to Green Crow's suggestions. In exploring their suggestions,
we learned more about an interest Green Crow had in developing approximately 45 acres of
residentially zoned land within the City Limits. Green Crow' s proposed development was located East
of Mt Angeles Road and South of Campbell Avenue, on land which is owned by Green Crow (see
Map).
In follow-up discussions, Green Crow explained certain development challenges they faced in the
Campbell Ave area such as existing deficiencies in an extensive area of existing City sewer
infrastructure North of the proposed project. Additionally, Green Crow shared cost comparisons for
transformer installation between the City and those that they experience in the County with the PUD.
In particular, these two issues were discouraging Green Crow's investment interest. Green Crow's
issues also suggested how the development at'private-sector investment of other large scale,
undeveloped property's in the same vicinity and elsewhere in the City may be hampered by traditional
City policy. Based on that information, and in an effort to try and bring the Green Crow Campbell
Ave investment forward, staff encouraged Green Crow to consider submitting a specific written
proposal. The intent of obtaining a specific proposal was to explore the potential for crafting a
development agreement between the City and Green Crow as authorized by State statute.
Green Crow submitted their proposal in October 2003, (see attached Letter, October 2, 2003). The
proposal is for a multi-phased development which includes an initial 28 acre subdivision on the
southerly portion of the development site, followed by a proposed 17 acre Planned Residential
Development (PRD), on the northerly portion of the development site. The subdivision consists of
43 single family homes, and the proposed PRD would consist of approximately 43 single family homes
and 7 multi-family residential structures. Green Crow proposes to fully develop both the residential
building lots and the respective residential structures throughout the development site, as a
neighborhood "village" with a mix of middle class to high-end housing stock. The "village" also
includes several acres of open space and a proposed dedication to the City of 2 acres of park space.
In their proposal, Green Crow has suggested that the entire project, when completed, would add
approximately $25,000,000 in assessed value to the City's tax base. City staff generally concur with
Green Crow's approximated assessed valuation increase. Based on a set of reasonable assumptions,
as determined by City staff, an analysis of the estimated increase in valuation will be presented during
Council's consideration of the Development Agreement on July 20th.
Analysis: Upon receipt of the proposal, staffbegan an extensive internal review process that included
participation by all appropriate City Departments. In addition to staff review, the examination of
Green Crow's proposal also included consideration and guidance from the City Council's Community
and Economic Development Committee, chaired by Councilwoman Roger's. Councilman Pittis's
experience with residential infrastructure development and knowledge of City infrastructure, and
Councilman William's experience with local residential market values were also utilized as resources
during the analysis and drafting of the proposed development agreement.
During the analysis, considerable insight was gained that additionally helped staff.understand how the
City can better position itself to attract residential development investment throughout the city limits.
In particular, insights gained through this experience has directly influenced several staff proposals,
some still under development, for proposed policy changes city-wide, such as the the NICE
Neighborhoods Program and Strategy proposed by the City Manager and adopted by Council in April
2004, as well as potential changes for transformer charges and fire sprinkler subsidies.
Throughout the review and subsequent negotiations with Green Crow, it was emphasized that in order
for their proposed project to move forward, the cost for public improvements supporting the proposed
development must be competitive with development costs for a similar project if it were developed
outside of the Port Angeles city limits. The challenge for the City is that our traditional practice has
been to have new development pay for any necessary installation and/or upgrading of all public
infrastructure, both onsite and off.site, and whether it be for new infrastructure or the reconstruction
of existing, and sometimes sub-standard infrastructure. The later has been the case in this particular
area of the City, where major land development has been, at least in part, stymied due to the necessity
of upgrading a broad area of offsite, existing sewer infrastructure. The area in question was annexed
into the City in various segments over an extended period of time, and the sewer infrastructure of
concern occurs East of Mt Angeles Road/Race Street to approximately Liberty Street, and North of
Campbell Ave to Lauridsen Blvd. According to City Public Works, this area of existing sewer
infrastructure is at or near capacity, and on numerous occasions has already experienced backups and
overflows, (see attached Memo, April 14, 200466
At the conclusion of the City's review of the Green Crow proposal, a response was developed and
transmitted by letter to Green Crow from the City Manager on December 8, 2003 (attached). The
response offered a position which staff considered could be supported in a subsequent
recommendation to the City Council. Each aspect of the original Green Crow proposal was addressed
in the response. While the response did not support all of the issues or conditions that Green Crow
had requested, most of the major costs associated with offsite development were addressed. Where
applicable, potential cost impacts to both the City and Green Crow were initially estimated and
highlighted, and in certain cases, such as the costs for power, a "ceiling", or not-to-exceed level on
total cost sharing by the City was offerred.
The City Manager' s transmittal back to Green Crow concluded that if the City' s response was generally
acceptable to Green Crow, then a contractually binding development agreement could be drafted for
consideration by both Green Crow and the City Council. In a follow-up meeting, Green Crow and City
staff agreed to begin development of the formal development agreement contract (attached).
Funding Strategy to support the recommended Development Agreement
Potential City costs associated with the recommended Development Agreement have been updated since
the December 8, 2003 letter response back to Green Crow. The updated costs and impact to the City
are proposed as follows:
Off site Improvements Park Ave Sewer Reconstruction (Porter to Race) $ 303,000
Campbell Ave Street Improvements (Mt Angeles to Porter) $ 50,000
50% Cost share on Power Transformers $ 19,990
Multi-family Unit Fire Sprinkler Subsidy 48 units ~ $200/unit $ 9,600
The offsite sewer and street improvements have been incorporated into the City's recently adopted
Capital Facilities Plan, and are currently proposed to be supported by the Sewer Fund and Street Fund
respectively.
Proposed cost sharing on power transformers is similarly recommended to be supported via the Light
Utility Fund. However, it should be noted that an anticipated change in the way the Light Utility charges
for transformers city-wide is currently under analysis by staff In the event a change in the way the Light
Utility recovers the costs for transformers is implemented before the completion of transformer
installation for the Green Crow Campbell Ave development is done, then staff proposes that Green
Crow would receive the highest level of benefit based on a comparison between the recommended
Development Agreement and any subsequently adopted city-wide changes in Light Utility policy.
With regard to the recommended fire sprinkler subsidy, it should be noted that although the City Fire
Code in more stringent than the State Code, the City has not been providing a subsidy for multi-family
residential development. State Fire Code mandates sprinkler systems in multi-family building of 16 or
more units, he City Fire Code mandates sprinkler systems in all multi-family building (including those
less than 15 units. For the purposes of the recommended development agreement with Green Crow, the
City cost associated with fire sprinkler subsidy would come from the General Fund. It should be noted
that staff is currently analyzing the potential for making a future recommendation that this subsidy be
available on a city-wide basis for multi-family buildings up to 15 units maximum.
Timing of proposed City obligations, and Green6C~ow Development commitment
Apart from funding commitments, the recommended Development Agreement commits both the City
and Green Crow to certain development timing issues. For the City, those commitments center around
the installation of certain offsite public infrastructure improvements. The timing commitment outlined
in the proposed agreement for the City was considered and scheduled under the guidance of the Public
Works Department. As they are outlined in the recommended agreement, the Public Works Department
is confident the City commitments can be met. In particular, the sewer commitment provides both the
City and the Developer the predictability and assurance of how much additional load may come on line
and when.
As for the assurance for the City that the Developer will bring forth and complete the multi-phased
development and complete the overall project, the phases have been defined under sections 3.2.1 and
3.2.2, pages 1 and 2 of the Development Agreement. And, the timing commitment is outlined under
Timing of Improvements, page 7 of Exhibit B.
Of special note, the section on Timing of Improvements outlines how Green Crow will be committing
to completing at least Phases 1 and 2 (32 lots) of the Subdivision portion of the overall project and will
do so within 36 months of signing the Agreement. This section of the recommended agreement also
binds Green Crow to making application for the PRD within 6 months signing of the agreement and
completing Phase 1 (12 lots) of the PRD within 36 months of signing of the agreement. It should be
understood that the final design and outcome of the proposed PRD and its' ultimate construction will
be subject to a future public process. Therefore neither the City nor Green Crow can, at this time,
guarantee that the PRD as currently envisioned will happen. However, in the event that it does not go
forward as currently envisioned, then the City's obligations for street improvements on Campbell Ave
could be nullified since they are contingent on the completed PRD. Although the recommended
Development does commit the City to the Park Ave Sewer Reconstruction project, and does so without
absolute assurance that Phase 3 of the Subdivision and Phases 2, 3, and 4 of the proposed PRD occurs,
it is staffs recommendation that the City' s investment in the off`site sewer system go ahead since it would
resolve a current infrastructure deficiency that already has a history of being insufficient for reliably
meeting the existing residential development load.
Finally, with respect to the proposed park, the intended site would be a centrally located 2 acre area
which would be dedicated to the City as a future neighborhood-like park. The Development Agreement
calls for Green Crow to work with the City Parks Department to provide rough grading of the area so
as to facilitate a level and clear mowing surface suitable for lawn area and children's play equipment.
Green Crow would also be responsible for the provision of utility stub outs at the park site for future
City use.
Attachments:
· Vicinity and Site Map
· Green Crow Proposal; October 2, 2003
· Public Works Memo; April 14, 2004
· City Response to Green Crow; December 8,2003
· Green Crow/City Development Agreement
68
) ..
!
Green Crow Proposal October 2, 2003
GREEN CROW TIMBER LLC
GREEN CROW PROPERTIES, INC. ~ ~
GREEN CROW
October 2, 2003
Port Angeles City Council
321 E 5th Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Dear Council Members:
Thank you for your willingness to discuss our project on Campbell Avenue with an open mind.
If we work together, we can make this a viable project that can be worthwhile for Green Crow
Properties, Inc. and the City of Port Angeles. If Green Crow does this project, we believe our
goals of building a quality development, that ~vill be an asset to the community for many
decades, will mesh nicely with what the city and the local community would be comfortable
with.
To insure the ultimate goal, Green Crow needs to be making a profit with the project. If there is
no economic benefit from the project, eventually the quality of the project will suffer, or most
likely, it will not continue. Therefore, it is very important that we start the project under
circumstances that give it the best chance to succeed.
That said, I would like to give you an outline of our proposal for the Campbell Avenue/Rook
Drive subdivision.'
I hope you and your staff will take a real hard look at this proposal and consider that it is an
outline of what we feel we need to make this a viable project.
If we can come to agreement, we believe this will be a successful project. We would hope to
work through the planning process this fall and winter and be in a position to start construction
on the initial phases early in the summer.
I believe the project will be very marketable once we begin and it is quite possible we could
complete all phases within 5-7 years. Obviously, economic conditions will have a great deal of
influence on build out rates, though.
703 East 8th Street · P.O. Box 2439
Port Ang~ WA
98362
(360) 452-3325 · FAX (360) 417-3674
Anyway, our initial goal would be to complete the first three phases of the project by mid to late
2004, with a variety of residences, including upper end homes, mid level homes and multi-family
units. When the majority of these sell out, we would begin other phases.
From the City's perspective, the economics of this project should be very attractive. It will add
approximately 150 residences to the city that will have assessed values something around
$25,000.000. I don't pretend to understand the economics of the city, but that has to be a large
economic benefit to the city.,
Outline of proposal included.
Sincerely,
Dennis Yakovich
Green Crow Properties, Inc.
cc: Mike Quinn
Tim Smith
70
Timing
120 day approval after submittal of application. If city requires more information from
developer after submittal, 120-day approval date will not change. To have full activity
next summer, we will need approval of the project by March 2004.
Off site '
No expense to Green Crow to extend sewers, water and power to any property line of
Green Crow parcel. All utilities to property lines with capacity to supply the entire
project.
No street or sidewalk improvements required off site, including along Campbell Ave.
No engineering of off site utilities to be paid for by Green Crow.
Engineering
Green Crow requests that city will provide engineering for power and water facilities, on
site, at city's expense. Developer will provide site plans prior to engineering and have
final approval of designs. I am assuming city can do power and waterline engineering, in
house, just as the PUD does for Clallam County.
Developer will provide engineering fi>r roads, sewer and storm water drainage. Roads
will not require WDOT standards. Standards will be agreed to before preliminary
approval. Current specifications that affect durability of the streets are very_ acceptable to
RS.
Streets
Standards for subgrade, ballast and road surfacing at current standards. The only licensed
engineering required would be for compaction tests.
Asphalt required within one year of final approval for each phase, except on the last
phase. On last phase, asphalt required prior to final approval.
Lots are sellable, building permits can be approved and occupancy permits can be granted
prior to completion of asphalt. This allows building construction to occur along with site
development. If developer builds, building permits for those structures can be granted
prior to final approval.
Street widths -- Minimums
Main development street 24'
Local access 20'
Under 200' length 7] 16' Maximum 6 residences
Curb and gutter at developer's option including design. Proper LID drainage methods
will take care of runoff.
Right of way widths as little as 40 feet depending on actual street width, sidewalk needs
and design concepts of the particular area of the development.
Cul-de-sac or hammerhead required only if life safety is an issue. If Cul-de-sac only
provides turn around for convenience, then city has the option to install at their expense.
No requirement for 200' street, but no parking allowed on those streets.
If streetlights are required, city will provide at their own expense except at intersections.
Utilities
It appears that electrical installation for our Rook Drive short plat cost about twice as
much, per lot, as similar projects we have done in the county in the past three years. We
need to review these costs in more detail to see what the differences are. However, if this
is really true, we will need to dramatically reduce these costs if this project is going to be
successful.
Fire Protection
City to install fire hydrants at city's expense.
No requirements for sprinkler systems. Instead, city will raise subsidy from $500 per
household to $1500 per household (or per unit, if multi family).
My understanding is that the new ordinance does not require sprinklers on existing lots in
the same area.
Let the homeowners make their own decision. Developer will help in promoting use of
sprinkler system if benefits are clearly higher than added costs.
Cost to city $10,000-15000/yr. less benefit to fire dept.
Wetlands
Allow us to remove all trees from wetland buffer and wetlands. No machinery allowed in
wetland. Stumps will be left.
Zoning & Density
Maintain current density of entire area by allowing multi family on portions of property
and flexibility on lot sizes, maybe down to as little as 3500-sq. ft., for some cluster
development. 72
- Vacate Porter Street that is part of our property.
Reimburse developer for cost of improvements if any improvement used by other
landowners within 15 years of completion of project.
Wave plan check fees for repeat use of plans.
74
10/2/03
POWER COSTS ROOK DRIVE (CITY) VS. GRETCHEN WAY (COUNTY)
ROOK DRIVE: 4 Lots, Approx. 800 fi. of cable
A. City Material and labor for 800 fi, 2 vaults: =7,330
B. Our Ditching cost, conduit handling cost: =3,051
C. 800 fi. of 3 inch conduit =1,100
D. Hired Supervising Electrician (Jim Halvorsen): =1,018
TOTAL: $12,499
Per Lineal Foot: $15.60
Cost per Lot: $ 3,125
(Note: We installed conduit, ditches and vault pads. City pulled wire and established
technical components of vaults, tied into poles. Conduit is always required by city for
these types of jobs. City required a licensed electrician to monitor the conduit
installation. This project was done in 2002.
GRETCHEN WAY: 7 Lots, Approx. 1440 fi. of cable
A. 1440 fi. of cable, 5 J Boxes and PUD Material: =7,852
B. Ditching, our labor: =2,325
$10,177
Per Lineal Foot: $7.06
Cost Per Lot: $1,453
(Note: This project was done in 1998. No conduit was needed.)
Some Key Differences:
-Conduit required by city
-City Light Dept. says that P.U.D. buys cable in bulk, saving money
-City Council sets labor rates different from P.U.D.
75
Green Crow Properties --.-- Project Boundry
Campbell Avenue Project ~',~L'~.~'~. BRA (Right of Way)
Trail
[ Lot Lines
p~.~ Campbell Ave.
MULTI-FAMILY
)------~l OPE. sP^cE
'" ., .. ,,'1
\, \~', "---?" "---.. I
· ' \ OPEN SPACE I
\
76
Memo April 14, 2004
· ORTANGELES
1~ W A S H I N G T O N, U. S. A.
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
DATE: April 14, 2004
TO: GLENN A. CUTLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES
FROM: GARY W. KENWORTHY, PE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES/CITY
ENGINEER
SUBJECT: PARK AVENUE SEWER SCHEDULE AND COSTS~ RACE TO PORTER
The existing sanitary sewer in Park Avenue is overloaded and cannot accommodate additional
connections until critical sections are replaced. This sewer section also is a primary cause o£backups
and overflows that can occur when the system is overloaded during extreme weather conditions.
Replacement of this section will not only facilitate economic development in the area but will also
have the side benefit of reducing the financial and environmental impacts associated with backups
and overflows.
Future development in the area south of Park Avenue, east of Race Street, is constrained by this lack
of adequate sewer capacity. The main constraint is a flat sloped section of 8" main between Race mid
Porter Streets. In order to facilitate development in the area it has been proposed that the City
reconstruct this section of sewer. Completion of this section will facilitate the Green Crow
Subdivisions south of Campbell Avenue (43 currently proposed and 42 future units), New View
Subdivision 14 units) John Ralston Subdivisions (8 current plus 12 pending units), proposed
multifamily (24 units) on the parcel north of Park and west of and adjacent to Park View Villas, along
with other potential residential/multifamily in fill construction in the area. Without including the
unknown in fill development the above pending development totals 143 units.
The sewer replacement project from Porter to Race is currently under design. The sewer replacement
design also includes design of future widening, curb and gutter, and storm drainage from Porter to
Race which could be included in the project if grant funding is obtained. The design is scheduled to
be completed by July 2004 and the sewer replacement could be under construction and be completed
by the end of this year. Consideration should be given to delaying the sewer project until summer of
2005 to permit City staff to pursue grants for the added sidewalk and street improvements. In prior
correspondence, based on our design consultants capacity review, we had noted that 6 units could
currently be added directly to the Park Avenue line west of Porter without significant upstream
impacts. Our consultants review further recommended however, that no new sewer services should be
added upstream of Park Avenue without completion of the sewer replacement project. On a case by
case basis a limited number of building permits could be issued with the understanding (Signed
Acknowledgment) that certificates of occupancy would not issued until the Park Avenue line has been
replaced.
Currently the sewer system under normal weather conditions can handle the areas flows without
backups throughout the year. We have, in the past, ~x~erienced backups and overflows during
extreme wet weather conditions (Heavy rain and rapid snow melt conditions). An earlier sewer
replacement on Grant Avenue has relieved some of the backup problems on that street. Completion of
the replacement project would reduce the prospect of future damage claims and fines for backups and
overflows in the area.
The following is a breakdown of the overall Park Avenue project costs:
Phase I: Design of Sewer, Storm, Widening, Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk; Porter to Race $ 68,000
Phase II: Construction of Sewer Replacement; Porter to Race $235,000
Phase HI: Construction of Widening, Storm Drainage and Sidewalks; Liberty to Race
Storm Drainage $145,000
.-. Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk $170,000
Widening (8' North Side) $ 38,000
$353,000 $353,000
Total $656,000
It is suggested that Phase II be scheduled for early 2005 construction. Phase III should be delayed
until grant funding is obtained to reduce City costs. The 2004 budget includes $465,000 ($45,000 for
design and $420,000 for construction) for the Park Avenue sewer replacement. The project was not
identified in time to be included in the Wastewater Bond. It is recommended that the Phase II be
executed utilizing reserves and CFP funding. Suggested funding sources include the following:
Phase I: Design of Sewer, Sidewalk and Street Improvements (Porter to Race)
Complete July 2004
2004 Residential Infrastructure Development; GG03-03 ($50K) $50,000
2004 Sidewalk matching funds; TR74-99 ($25K) $18,000
Total $68,000
Phase II: Construction of Sewer only (Porter to Race)
Construction start August 2004 and complete November 2004.
2005 Annual Repl. Lines; WW27-99 ($235K/2 year program) Total $235,000
Phase III: Construction of Street and Sidewalk Improvements (Liberty to Race)
Design(Liberty to Porter) complete March 2005, Construction start April 2005
and complete August 2005.
Sidewalk Grant; WW07-00 $150,000
School District Grant Match; WW07-00 $ 20,000
Carryover 2004 Community Projects; GG05-03 ($115K) $115,000
City Sidewalk Grant Match; WW07-~($25K) $ 25,000
In Kind City Design (Liberty to Port~r~, Inspections, & Management $ 43,000
Total $353,000
This year we will be applying for WSDOT (May) and/or TIB (August) which could provide up to
$150,000 in grant funding for Phase III. By using $20,000 in school district funding and remainder of
City funding as noted for a large grant match (57.5%) we should score well in the selection process.
In order to utilize the grant funding, if successful, we would need to delay Phase III construction until
the funds are available in the spring of 2005. We will know if the grant is to be funded in November
2004. An overall construction cost savings could be realized by delay of the Phase II construction to
be combined with Phase III and constructed in spring/summer of 2005. This would be a recommended
action if the upstream residential developments are not scheduled to need sewer service until early
2005 after the winter rains.
Sewer related system charges ($745) and sewer connection fees ($95) totaling $890 will be collected
for each residential sewer hookup. With 150 potential hookups this totals $133,500. These sewer
costs would be paid by the home owner or developer as part of the building permitting process.
Should additional funding recovery by desired for the sewer replacement implementation of a
developer recovery agreement (DRA) in which the City would be the developer could be considered.
With the DRA the City could recoup the sewer design and construction costs as each home or living
unit is permitted. Assuming $240,000 of applicable final costs and a potential of 150 residential units
within the DRA area over the next ten years area the cost per unit would be in the range of $1,600.00
each. Total system charges, connection fees, and the DRA would total $2,450.00 for each residential
sewer hookup.
Copy: Mike Quinn
Tim Smith
N:~PROJECTS~4-04 Park Ave Sewer lmprovementsXschd-$-development.wpd
79
-. .
This map ia ,~ imenaed to be used ~ a~eacn~tio,.
~is map.'~rm~ing is pr~,ced by the Ci~ o/Pon Angeks f~ its ~.n ,se and p,r~ses.
~ny other ,se o~hi$ map/drinking shall ~t be t~e res~n.~ibil~ of the Ci~.
pORTANC;} City_ Response to Green Crow December 8, 2003
·
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
·
· ~ December 8, 2003
· Dennis Yakovitch
Green Crow Properties, Inc.
703 East 8th Street
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
Re: Development Agreement Proposal - Campbell Avenue Project
Dear Dennis:
Thank you for your patience and cooperation in working collaboratively with the City on a new
development project in the vicinity of Campbell Avenue and Porter Street. Green Crow has an
interest in constructing a quality development, but must be able to assure its financial feasibility.
The City desires to enhance its assessed value and encourage development, but must be able to
justify public improvements through increased private investment. While there is risk to both
parries, there is also mutual benefit, especially in having the opportunity to create a quality
neighborhood improvement. It is my belief that Port Angeles must stimulate economic
development for the long-term goal of improving community value in both financial and livability
terms.
As a new program to encourage infrastructure development that expands opportunities or corrects
deficiencies, I am proposing that your development be the test project for a new program called
NICE Neighborhoods. This program stands for "New Infrastructure for Community Enhancement
to Neighborhoods". Similar to other programs like tax increment financing or other economic
incentives, the NICE Neighborhoods program is applied to those projects which significantly
increase neighborhood valuation. The significance is measured as returning estimated
incremental taxes at full development sufficient to cover the public's investment in off-site
infrastructure improvements within six years. The program is dependent upon budget
appropriations, and other details to be determined through Council policy. However, I believe
those basic principles will be well received by the City Council in terms of policy direction.
The following response to your request for specific support in a development proposal has taken
staff to new areas of policy and operations analysis. Since our first meeting on this subject on
July 29th, I have had staff review every item as to its impact to the City and how we could partner
with the development community for public benefit. I believe our response is rather amazing in
Page 1 of 10
321 EAST FIFTH STREET ® P. O. BOX 1150 ® PORT ANGELES, WA 98362-0217
PHONE: 360-41'7-4500 ® FAX: 360-4184~09 ® TTY: 360-41'7-4645
E-MAIL: ClTYMG R~CI. PORT-ANGELES.WA.US
terms of new approaches to assisting development. While we were unable to support all of your -.
requests, we have determined ways to support most of them; and certainly the majority costs of
off-site development issues which have long stymied development in the area.
I ask that you review the following response and that, if acceptable, we jointly draft a
development agreement for City Council consideration. This will give you security to move
ahead in the development application process as to the parameters of known City staff support.
If there are some minor issues in need of clarification, I am happy to meet with you. I feel we
should move forward in the process and am confident that any outstanding issue can be resolved
at the Council level.
Green Crow Development Proposal
A. Timing:
1. 120 day approval after submittal of application. If City requires more
btformation from developer after submittal, 120-day approval dates will not
change. To have full activity next summer, we will need approval of the project
by March 2004.
Response:
The 120 day approval is acceptable after submittal of a complete application. We will
assist in the guideline requirements and information to enable application completeness.
We will allow minor information adjustments without impacting the deadline.
Direct cost impact to City: Staff time.
B. Off-Site (Improvements):
1. No expense to Green Crow to extend sewers, water and power to any property
line of Green Crow parcel. All utilities to property lines with capacity to supply
the entire project.
Response:
(a) Water and power utilities are already in the public rights-of-way within acceptable
access to your property parcel. There is sufficient capacity in those utilities to
service your project.
(b) Sewer capacity has been the obstacle to development in this area and is a problem
in terms of capacity and cost. I do not believe that this is the responsibility of the
developer to correct an existing problem. If the capacity were sufficient to serve
the neighborhood and your development increased the density capacity beyond the
Page 2 of 10
82
norm, then I believe the developer has some responsibility to address the added
capacity improvements. However, in this case it is my belief that the problem is
pre-existing to your development and that we cannot even add a small number of
homes to service the existing land use without causing some capacity disruption
to the cvrrent neighborhood. Therefore, the City will construct the necessary off-
site sewer improvements to service the area. This is in-line with my proposal to
the Council to endorse this program of utilizing public infi'astructure to
smtegically encourage community development and growth of our tax and service
base.
Direct cost impact to City: CFP estimate at $350,000.
2. l~ street or sidewalk improvements required off-site, including along Campbell
· yen tte.
Response:
(a) Campbell Avenue adjacent to your front property line is considered your frontage
and part of your on-site development responsibility. While current zoning and
arterial designation would require a wider roadway, we have flexibility within the
PRD process to allow less. The current street width is approximately 20 feet and
we propose the neighborhood arterial standard of 24 feet paved width for that
western half of your parcel that fronts on Campbell Avenue. This would also
require a walking path, which would be useful for access to the proposed park area
and school route extension to the west of Porter Street on Campbell. The
estimated cost to your development, assuming a PRD, is $16,330 for these
frontage improvements, including ditch, culverts, gravel walkway, driveways, and
four (4) feet widening. This is a savings of over $40,000 from the current zoned
standards.
You may note, while not on the latest set of plan concepts, we talked about the
addition ora park site in an area adjacent to your frontage on Campbell avenue.
This would be viewed as a favorable component of the PRD plan; and it was
desired in your initial planning concepts. With the walking path and City's
commitment to improvements to Campbell Avenue west of your property, this
concept would fit in very nicely as an amenity to the neighborhood. Due to your
overall density, this would be a likely requirement of the PRD.
(b) Off-site improvements to Campbell Avenue west of Porter Street are proposed to
be handled by the City. This will allow a coordinated development to better align
the street rights-of-way and complete school walking route improvements for a
walkway. We will apply similar arterial standards of 24 foot widening with a
gravel walkway.
Direct cost impact to the City: $24,840.
Pa~.,.~ of 10
(c) As a new proposal addition requested by the City, we feel the aesthetics and
function of these roadway improvements to Campbell Avenue would be enhanced
by a 0.1 foot overlay. This would help market your development with the
appearance of a new street while the actual improvements were not necessary for
that level of look. The estimated cost impact is $14,000 for your frontage along
Campbell Avenue. The City would take care of the off-site overlay on the
remaining portion to the west.
Direct cost impact to the City: $24,000.
(d) No improvements to Porter Street will be required, conditioned upon there being
no access to Porter Street in the final PRD site development plan.
3. No engineerh~g of off-site utilities to be paid for by Green Crow.
Response:
All off-site and frontage improvements discussed above in B1 and 2 would be engineered
by the City. I propose this since we are attempting to continue improvements down
Campbell Avenue to the west of your property and we should just coordinate the widening
and walkways into one comprehensive design, rather than separate ones.
Direct cost impact to the City: Up to $50,000 in engineering and/or staff time.
C. Engineering:
1. Green Crow requests that the City will provide engineering for power and water
facilities, on-site, at City's expense. Developer will provide site plans prior to
enghteering and have final approval of designs. I am assuming City can do
power and waterline engineering, in house, just as the PUD does for Clallam
County.
Response:
(a) The City provides engineering for the power system, but we do charge the
developer fees which are intended to cover costs.
(b) The City does not provide engineering services to private development on-site for
water improvements. Our experience indicates that a civil engineer has basic
experience with streets, storm, water and sewer connections, etc. It is more cost-
effective for one engineer to coordinate all such designs. However, as noted
above, power design is more specialized and not as common, so the City does this
engineering.
Paget,4 of 10
2. Developer will provide engineering for roads, sewer and storm water drainage.
Roads will not require WSDOT standards. Standards will be agreed to before
preliminary approvaL Current specifications that affect durability of the streets
are ve~_ acceptable to us.
Response:
The City agrees with this approach and will incorporate our recently revised low-cost
impact standards.
D. Streets:
1. Standards for subgrade, ballast and read surfacing at current standards. The
only licensed engineering wouM be for compaction tests.
Response:
(a) Current low-cost impact standards will apply.
(b) The City requires a licensed engineer stamp on the design plans in addition to the
compaction tests. The requirement is a function of the professional ethics and
requirements of being a licensed engineer and being responsible for the work.
You will be using an engineer for road, sewer, water and storm drainage anyway;
it only makes sense that the plans are stamped by the engineer responsible for the
work or directly supervising the work. The City is performing off-site
improvement engineering.
2. Asphalt required within one year of final approval for each phase, except on the
last phase. On last phase, asphalt required prior to final approval
Response:
This is acceptable, but the developer is responsible for maintaining the gravel roadbed for
the one year period prior to paving.
3. Lots are sellable, building permits can be approved and occupancy permits can
be granted prior to completion of asphalt. This allows building construction to
occur along with site development. If developer builds, building permits for
those structures can be granted prior to final approval
Response:
This is acceptable.
Pa~l~6 of 10
4. Street kVidths:
Main development street 24ft. minimum
Local access 20fl. minimum
Under 200ft. length (max 6 units) 16ft. minimum
Response:
The 24 fl. and 20 fi. minimums are consistent with our low-cost impact street standards.
We have previously talked about the 16 fi. widths and expressed a reluctance to go there
due to public safety and public service concerns; however, we also did not want to cause
layout and design access problems if they could be avoided by such a change. We do note
that the most recent preliminary design layout avoids the use of such small streets. With
a PRD process we have more flexibility for layout design and feel that we can avoid the
need for 16 fi. street widths.
5. Curb and gutter at developer's options including design. Proper LID drainage
methods will take care of runoff.
Response:
This is acceptable. Once again, with a PRD, the drainage can be handled with more
solutions and alternatives that meet our mutual interests.
6. Right-of-way widths as little as 40 feet, depending on actual street width,
sidewalk needs and design concepts of the particular area of the development.
Response:
This is acceptable within the review of a PRD. The important point here is that we are
willing to move off the standard 60 ft. right-of-way and allow less depending upon the
design impacts. For example, Rook Drive may function better at a fight-of-way greater
than 40 ft.; but the cul-de-sacs may function fine with this fight-of-way. We also notice
that you have predominately relied on 50 fi. fight-of-ways in your latest preliminary
design; and this is quite acceptable to us.
7. Cul-de-sac or hammerhead required only if life safety is an issue. If cul-de-sac
only provides turn around for convenience, then City has the option to install
at their expense. No requirement for 200fl. street, but no parking allowed on
these streets.
Response:
Cul-de-sacs would be required on non-through streets to facilitate safe and efficient traffic
flow. Fire Code requirements stipulate that dead-end roads in excess of 150 feet must
have a turn around area. We believe this would be desired by residents, their visitors, and
Pa~6 of 10
of course it facilitates public safety and public services. Once again, your most recent
design utilizes cul-de-sacs, and we are willing to work with you on radius design.
& If streetlights are required, City will provide at their own expense, except at
intersections.
Response:
This is acceptable, and streetlights would be used at intersections for traffic safety.
E. Utilities:
1. It appears that electrical installation for our Rook Drive short plat cost about
twice as much, per lot, as similar projects we have done in the county in the past
three years. We need to review these costs itt more detail to see what the
differences are. However, if this is really true, we will need to dramatically
reduce these costs if this project is going to be successful.
Response:
For comparison purposes, I asked Public Works to propose a cost comparison, using your
preliminary plat design, for City electrical versus PUD electrical items. The cost
comparison is estimated below:
Item Description Ci_ty Cost Est. PUD Cost Est.
Material $ 83,400 $ 46,216
Labor 26,600 21,504
Equipment 12,400 9,840
Connection fee for 18 transformers 0 4,860
$122,400 $ 82,420
The significant difference is in the price of materials where the PUD does not charge the
developer for transformers, where the City does. The PUD incorporates this development
cost into their overall rate analysis for the system. While the two agencies approach this
cost of development in opposite ways, it appears to me that a compromise solution may
work best in being an incentive for development and being responsible and fair in our rate
impacts. The City designs the development of the power system, and the transformers
become a component that will vary in their size to serve multiple lots depending upon the
design layout and service load. For all our public utilities, we own the infrastructure to
which the customer connects their private service line. In this case, the transformer
becomes that public connection point. Since the City controls the design components and
assures compatibility for service load, and there is a policy directive to encourage
expansion and growth of the City, I propose that for this PRD the developer and City split
Pal~ of 10
equally the cost of the transformers as meeting our respective interests in an equal climate
of partnership. I further propose that the City review its policy and operational
components for electric rate analysis to incorporate this change in policy for future
developments meeting a set of criteria to be established later.
Direct cost impact to the City: $19,990.
F. Fire Protection:
1. City to install fire hydrants at City's expense.
Response:
The fire hydrants are engineered as part of the water system by the developer. We believe
this cost of fire hydrant installation to be relatively minor to the project and should be part
of the developer responsibility. We will, however, evaluate the required 500 ft. hydrant
spacing to allow us some design flexibility with the developer for reasonable deviation
from the standard.
2. No requirements for sprinkler systems. Instead, City will raise subsidy from
$500 per household to $1500 per household (or per unit, if multi-family). My
understanding is that the new ordinance does not require sprinklers on existing
lots in the same area. Let the homeowners make their own decision. Developer
'will help in promoting use of sprinkler system if benefits are clearly higher than
added costs. Cost to City $10,000 - $15,000 per year less benefit to fire
department.
Response:
Our municipal code requires new subdivisions outside the four minute response area to
have residential fire sprinkler systems. Since your proposed subdivision development is
within our response area, there is no requirement for sprinklers in single family and
duplex units of your development. If an individual homeowner desires to install a
sprinkler system, the City offers a $500 rebate as an incentive since we support the
superior life safety benefits of such a system. We are not inclined to raise this rebate to
$1500 as you suggest for single family units.
With regard to multi-family units, said fire sprinkler systems are required per our code,
and we support this requirement based upon the clear benefit life safety in such multi-
family density development. However, as a new proposal, we will support a $200 rebate
per individual multi-family housing unit up to a maximum of 16 units per building. This
would require an ordinance amendment by the City Council, but we are confident of their
consideration of such a proposal. The reason for limiting the incentive to multi-family
buildings with less than 16 units, is that State Fire Code requirements cover buildings with
Page 8 of 10
88
units of 16 and above as a mandatory installation. Since our municipal code requirement
is more stringent than the State's, we would offer some rebate to the developer on the cost
of meeting our municipal requirement.
Direct cost impact to the City: (48 units of MF) $9,600
G. Wetlands:
1. Allow us to rentove all trees from wetland buffer and wetlands. No machinery
allowed in wetland. Stumps will be left.
Response:
The City will support removing the trees but leaving the stumps in the wetland and
adjacent wetland buffer area. We are willing to remove the trees for view enhancement,
but we want to protect the basic land area functioning as a wetland buffer.
H. Zoning & Density:
1. Maintain current density of entire area by allowing multi-family on portions of
property and flexibility on lot sizes, maybe down to as little as 3500 sq. ft. for
some cluster development.
Response:
The PRD zoning process alloWs us flexibility to entertain your request. The PRD also
requires other considerations such as open space allowance in order to secure flexibility
in density design. The City will provide all pertinent zone information.
2. Vacate Porter Street that is part of our property.
Response:
We understand your need to maximize your available property for useful development.
While we can accommodate vacation of your portion of the Porter Street right-of-way, we
must first determine if any other property owner requires use of Porter Street for their
property access. We will explore this impact as information for your completed
application.
3. Reimburse developer for cost of improvements of any improvement used by other
landowners within 15years of completion of project.
Response:
The City's standard Latecomer's Agreement to allow other benefitting property owners
to reimburse you for usable improvements off-site is l0 years. In this particular
Page 9 of 10
89
agreement, the City has agreed to absorb the pertinent off-site costs, so a latecomer's
agreement is really not necessary. Since you are not investing in significant off-site
improvements, we cannot support a significant change in the agreement payback period.
We will certainly allow a Latecomer's Agreement, if needed.
4. Wave plan check fees for repeat use of plans.
Response:
This is acceptable.
I look forward to hearing from you on this response to your development proposal. The City has
come forward with public infrastructure development and engineering of over $400,000 in value
to create an opportunity for your development project to be successful and improve the
neighborhood's value.
Sincerely,
Michael Quinn
City Manager
I:\OFFICEXWPWrNhMYFILES\CM Cortes\Green Crow development agreement 03.wpd
Page 10 of 10
90
~ eORT ~ h
~,~~ CITYvF PORT ANGELES - PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
STANDARD DETAILS
~ ~- 7_J
' ~ ~ Z~ Z~
~ ~ . OZ ~ Z~
~ 0 ...... W . .~ .
0 8 INSPECllON REQUIRED UPON
COklPLEI?ON OF ROUGH GRADING AND
DURING PLACEIWENT OF STRUCTURAL
4 SEC DON.
ALL WORK AND IWAFERIALS ?0 BE IN ACCORDANCE WITTY CURRENT STANDARD SPECITICAI?ONS CALL FOR FORM INSPECDON BY CITY
FOR ROAD. BRIDGE AND ~4UNICIPAL CONSTRUCDON", WASHINGTON STALE DEPARDWENT OF PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE AND
?RANSPOR FA DON, AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIA DON. PR/OR TO PA WNG
APPROVED BY 911
DATE - 05/06/0J
.CITY ENGINEER : I Suburban Streets
~Oole: ~D6/03/03 -- Redsion Dote: 03/03/03 File: Suburban streets
92
Green Crow/City Development Agreement
Development Agreement
1. Parties.
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into effective the
__ day of , 2004, by and between the City of Port Angeles, a
Washington municipal corporation ("City") and GREEN CROW, INC., a Washington
corporation (the "Developer").
For and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the City and the
Developer do hereby agree as follows regarding the Campbell Avenue Development.
2. City Authority.
This Agreement is authorized by RCW 36.70B.170 and by thc City's police power,
contracting power, and other authority. This Agreement sets forth terms of cooperation between
thc City and the Developer in thc development of thc Campbell Avenue Development.
3. Project Elements.
3.1 Project Location.
The Green Crow Campbell Avenue Development site is an approximate 45 acre
site which is generally located South of Campbell Ave, East of Mt Angeles Road and West of
Wabash Street, within the City Limits of Port Angeles, Washington. The site is more
particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
The Campbell Avenue Development may hereafter be referred to as "the project."
3.2 Project Description.
The project consists of one subdivision and one planned residential development
(PRD). They are:
3.2.1 Green Crow Campbell Avenue Subdivision
A 28 acre site located in the RS-9 Residential Single Family zone with 43
single family residential building sites. Construction shall occur in 3 phases:
Phase 1 (Lots 1-8, 25-33) 17 lots total
Phase 2 (Lots 9-13, 34-43) 15 lots total
Phase 3 (Lots 14-24) 11 lots total
3.2.2 Green Grow Campbell Avenue Planned Residential Development
A 17 acre site partially located in the RS-9 Residential Single Family zone, and partially
located in the Residential High Density zone with 43 single family residential building sites and
7 multi-family residential building sites. Construction is estimated to occur in 4 phases:
Proposed phase 1 12 lots total
Proposed phase 2 12 lots total
Proposed phase 3 12 lots total
Proposed phase 4 12 lots total
4. Public and Private Open Spaces.
A central feature of Campbell Avenue Development is providing open spaces for use by
the public and protection of critical areas. There are two types of improved open spaces
(common usable areas) within the Project: (1) dedicated open spaces consisting of dedicated
portions of trails and park areas, and other public open spaces (that will be owned and
maintained by the City), and (2) non-dedicated open spaces consisting of park areas (that will be
maintained by the Developer or Homeowner Association), and other private open spaces outside
of the public right-of-way. A third type of open space not available for general use by the public
is found in two critical areas: White Creek ravine and a -acre wetland in the center of the
site.
5. Infrastructure and Utilities.
The parties agree that infrastructure and utilities will be constructed in accordance with
Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
6. Reservation.
The City reserves the right and authority to impose new or different regulations on the
project, or any part of it, to the extent required by serious threats to public health and safety.
7. General Provisions.
7.1 Governing Law.
This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws
of the State of Washington.
7.2 Binding on Successors; Assignment; Release of Liability.
This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors
and assigns of the Developer and the City.
7.3 Recording.
A memorandum of this Development Agreement shall be recorded as a covenant
running with the land and shall be binding on the Developer, and its mortgagees, successors and
permitted assigns.
7.4 Interpretation; Severability.
7.4.1 Interpretation. The parties intend this Agreement to be interpreted to the
full extent authorized by law as an exercise of the City's authority to enter into such agreements.
7.4.2 Severability. If any provisions of this Agreement are determined to be
unenforceable or invalid by a court of law, then the parties agree to negotiate in good faith to
modify the Agreement consistent with the court decision, and no party shall be obligated to
perform under this Agreement until the modification to this Agreement has been completed.
7.5 Authority.
The City and the Developer each represent and warrant it has the respective
power and authority, and is duly authorized, to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under
this Agreement.
7.6 Amendment.
This Agreement shall not be modified or amended without the express written
agreement of the City and the Developer.
7.7 Exhibits and Appendices.
Exhibits A and B are incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth.
7.8 Headings.
The headings in this Agreement are inserted for reference only and shall not be
construed to expand, limit or otherwise modify the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
7.9 Time of Essence.
Time is of the essence of this Agreement in every provision hereof. Unless
otherwise set forth in this Agreement, the reference to "days" shall mean calendar days. If any
time for action occurs on a weekend or legal holiday, then the time period shall be extended
automatically to the next business day.
7.10 Disputes; Default and Remedies.
7.10.1 Dispute Resolution. Should there arise any dispute, difference or claim
concerning the parties' performance of this Agreement, or the interpretation of this agreement, it
shall be referred to the City Manager, as representative of the City, and to ., as
representative of Green Crow. Those representatives shall negotiate in good faith to reach
95
achieve an amicable resolution. If the representatives are unable to resolve the dispute,
difference or claim, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only
be by filing suit in the Clallam County Superior Court, Clallam County, Washington, unless the
parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for
damages arising from the parties' performance of this agreement, each party shall pay all its legal
costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, in addition to
any other recovery or award provided by law. JURY TRIAL WAIVER: CITY AND
DEVELOPER HEREBY WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CLAIM
ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT OR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT,
WHETHER NOW OR HEREAFTER ARISING AND WHETHER SOUNDING IN
CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE AND HEREBY CONSENT AND AGREE THAT
ANY SUCH CLAIM SHALL BE DECIDED BY TRIAL WITHOUT A JURY. EITHER
PARTY HERETO MAY FILE AN ORIGINAL COUNTERPART OR COPY OF THIS
SECTION WITH ANY COURT AS WRITTEN EVIDENCE OF THE WAIVER AND
AGREEMENT CONTAINED HEREIN.
7.10.2 Default and Remedies. No party shall be in default under this Agreement
unless it has failed to perform under this Agreement for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt
of written notice of default from any other party. Each notice of default shall specify the nature
of the alleged default and the manner in which the default may be cured satisfactorily. If the
nature of the alleged default is such that it cannot be reasonably cured within the thirty (30) day
period, and if the defaulting party has commenced the cure within such time period, then a
reasonable time will be allowed for the diligent prosecution of the cure to completion. Any party
not in default under this Agreement shall have all rights and remedies provided by law including,
without limitation, damages, specific performance or writs to compel performance or require
action consistent with this Agreement.
7.11 Authorized Agent.
Developer hereby designates its agent with authority to give
notices, approvals and otherwise act pursuant to this Agreement. Unless otherwise stated by the
Developer, representations and actions by shall bind Developer as to all property
then owned by it within the Campbell Avenue Development
7.12 Effective Date and Term.
7.12.1 Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution
by all parties and by its adoption by the Port Angeles City Council.
7.12.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall continue until the earlier of any
default under this Agreement which is not cured within the applicable cure period, if any,
provided, under this Agreement or June 30, 2011, unless the Parties agree to extend it.
7.13 No Third Party Beneficiaries.
This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the
parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. No other person shall have any right
96
of action based upon any provision of this Agreement.
7.14 Interpretation.
This Agreement has been reviewed and revised by legal counsel for all parties and
no presumption or rule that ambiguity shall be construed against the party drafting the document
shall apply to the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement.
7.15 Notice.
All communications, notices and demands of any kind which a party under this
Agreement requires or desires to give to any other party shall be in writing and either (i)
delivered personally, (ii) sent by facsimile transmission with an additional copy mailed first
class, or (iii) deposited in the U.S. mail, certified mail postage prepaid, return receipt requested,
and addressed as follows:
If to the City: City of Port Angeles
Attn:
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
with a copy to: City of Port Angeles
Attn:
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
If to the Developer: Green Crow
with a copy to:
Notice by hand delivery or facsimile shall be effective upon receipt. If deposited in the U.S.
mail, notice shall be deemed delivered 48 hours after deposited. Any party at any time by notice
to the other party may designate a different address or person to which such notice or
communication shall be given.
7.16 Cooperation.
The parties shall not unreasonably withhold requests for information, approvals or
consents provided for in this Agreement to the extent allowed by law. The parties agree to take
further actions and execute further documents, either jointly or within their respective powers
and authority, to implement the intent of this Agreement. The City agrees to work cooperatively
with the Developer to achieve the mutually_agreeable goals as set forth in this Agreement,
subject to the terms of the Port Angeles Municipal Code and other applicable governmental
regulations.
7.17 Delays.
If either party is delayed in the performance of its obligations under this
Agreement due to Force Majeure, then performance of those obligations shall be excused for the
period of delay. "Force Majeure" shall mean "strikes, riots, judicial actions by federal or state
governmental agencies that enjoin construction on the Property, acts of God, war or acts of
terrorism.
7.18 No Partnership or Agency.
This agreement does not create any partnership or agency relationship between
the City and the developer. Neither shall be liable for the acts or failure of acts of the other.
7.19 Incorporation.
This document is the final written expression of the agreement between the
parties. There are no other agreements, oral or written, that modify or interpret this document.
This document supercedes and incorporates all prior negotiations, understandings and
agreements of the parties relating to the subject matter hereof.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES GREEN CROW
By: By:
Printed Name:
Title:
Attest: Date:
By:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk Printed Name:
Title:
Approved as to form: Date:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
G :\LEGALLPlanning\Green Crow\GreenCrowDevelopAgmt6.doc
Draft Date:July 14, 2004 (4:25)
98
Development Agreement
Exhibit A
Legal Description
99
Draft June 16,2004 (Rev June 24, 2004)
(Revised June 29, 2004)
(Revised July 9, 2004)
(Revised July 13, 2004)
Exhibit B
Campbell Avenue Development
· City Processing Of Developer's PRD Application
The City agrees to process the Green Crow Campbell Avenue Plarmed Residential
Development (PRD) application within 120 days ora determination of completeness of the
application. If City requires further information or clarifications after the determination of
completeness, the 120-day processing period will not change, provided developer provides
the additional information within a reasonable period of time.
· Zoning and Density
The City and the Developer agree that the zoning and density determination for the Green
Crow Campbell Avenue PRD shall be subject to the PRD process and final approval. The
City acknowledges that the Developer may seek multi-family development on some portions
of the project site and flexibility on single-family and multi-family lot sizes. The City agrees
to support the consideration of flexible lot sizes (not less than 3500 sq. ft. per single family
lot) subject to a PRD procedural process and final approval.
· Developer Reimbursement
The City and the Developer agree that should the Developer pay for any onsite or offsite
improvements, not including improvements to public rights-of-way fronting the subject site
and proposed lots, then the City's standard policy and procedures for "Developer
Reimbursement Agreements" (up to a maximum of 10 years) shall be utilized.
· Plan Check Fees
The Developer agrees to pay thc standard City plan check fcc for building permits for the
initial plan check of construction design plan(s). Except when additional plan checks arc
required due to changes in thc applicable code, thc City agrees to waive, for up to 24 months
from thc date of the last permit issued for that plan, additional plan check fees for the
repeated usc of identical construction plans for building permits.
-1-
100
· Wetlands
The City agrees that it will not unreasonably withhold permission for the Developer to
remove trees in wetland and wetland buffer areas within the project provided (1) the areas
will continue to function as a wetland and wetland buffer and (2) that tree removal will be
accomplished by a method that is mutually acceptable to the Developer and the City, and (3)
tree stumps and root systems are left in place and undisturbed.
· Engineering (Onsite)
Power: The City agrees to provide engineering for the onsite electric
distribution system, provided that the Developer will reimburse the
City for its engineering costs. The engineering cost will be
reasonable, and the electrical engineering will be provided in a timely
fashion.
Water The Developer agrees to provide engineering for the onsite domestic
water distribution system.
Roads The City and the Developer agree that standards for subgrade, ballast
and road surfacing will be at current low-impact development
standards. The City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines will
be used, and the WSDOT road standards will not be required. The
Developer agrees to provide engineering, including a licensed
engineer stamp, on the design plans and compaction tests, for the
onsite street system. Street cente- line locations may be allowed some
flexibility as to placement within the right-of-way, provided the entire
street surface, shoulder, ditches, walkways and utilities are still within
the right-of-way.
Sewer The Developer agrees to provide engineering for the onsite sewer
system at the Developer's expense.
Stormwater The Developer agrees to provide engineering for the onsite
stormwater system at the Developer's expense.
· Streets (Onsite)
Asphalt installation by the Developer may be delayed for up to one year of final approval for
each phase of development, with the exception of the final permitted phase, provided (1) that
the Developer agrees to submit a bond or other security acceptable to the city in the amount
of 120% of asphalt installation bid for asphalt installation for each phase of development,
and (2) agrees to maintain the gravel roadbed in a manner acceptable to the City, and (3) the
Developer declares in writing to the City and homesite buyer/owner at the time of occupancy
approval the specific time when the Developer will complete the subject street improvements
including final asphalt installation.
The City agrees that the lots will be sellable, that building permits can be approved, and that
occupancy permits may be granted prior to completion of asphalt installation, provided that
the offsite sewer improvements (Porter to Race) are completed by the City in accordance
with Streets (Offsite) and Utilities (Offsite) elements of the development agreement which
follow.
Provided that the developer satisfies the City's standard policies and procedures for insurance
of the permits, the City agrees to issue occupancy permits for a maximum of 4 residences prior to
August, 2005.
Subject to the PRD process and final approval, the City and the Developer agree to the
following minimum Onsite Street widths:
Primary access street(s) (standard suburban arterial) 24fi minimum
Local access (standard suburban access) 20fi minimum
The City and Developer agree that no street widths are contemplated less than the 20ft
minimum for local access.
Developer ALSO agrees to install, as directed by the City, "No Parking" signs on 20 ft and
24 ft streets.
Subject to determinations made during the subdivision and the PRD process and final
approval, the City agrees that curb and gutters will be at the Developer's option and design,
provided that proper drainage methods shall be utilized to manage stormwater runoff.
Subject to determinations made during the PRD process and final approval, the City and the
Developer agree that right-of-way widths may be as little as 50 feet.
The Developer agrees that cul-de-sacs or mutually agreeable and equivalent turn-around,
shall be required on all non-through streets in excess of 150 feet, and that the radius and
design of any particular cul-de-sac shall be approved on a case-by-case basis, subject to
agreement by the City and approval by the City Engineer and Fire Marshall.
The City agrees to pursue a potential transfer of ownership and/or jurisdictional
responsibility between the City and Clallam County for a portion of Mt Angeles Road from
Rook Drive north to the current City Limit. Assuming a transfer is successful, then in lieu
of any roadway and pedestrian improvements on Mt Angeles Road from Rook Drive to
Campbell Avenue, the Developer agrees to design and construct (1) a minimum 20 foot wide
extension of Rook Drive connecting to Wabash Avenue and (2) minimum 8 foot wide trail
102
corridor within the project area from Rook Drive to Campbell Avenue. Prior to final plat
approval, the developer further agrees to improve the trail corridor to include a minimum 6
foot wide, paved trail with underground conduit for a future (City funded) trail lighting
system.
The Developer agrees to install streetlights at each and every intersection, and potential blind
curve(s) or grade(s) within the proposed project at the Developers expense. Subject to the
final plan for street layout, should the City desire streetlights at locations other than
intersections, blind curves or grades, the City agrees to install non-intersection streetlights
at City expense. The City retains the right to be reimbursed for some or all City expenses
for non-intersection streetlights from benefitted adjacent homeowners.
The portion of Campbell Avenue adjacent to the northerly Green Crow property line west
to Porter is considered Green Crow frontage. If the PRD process is successful, the Developer
agrees to design and construct that frontage portion of Campbell Avenue to a minimum 24
foot paved width (which constitutes a 4 foot widening of the current roadway) including a
0.1 foot asphalt overlay of the minimum 24 foot street. The Developer further agrees to the
design and construction of ditch, culverts, all-weather walkway, and driveway approaches
along the Green Crow frontage.
The City and the Developer acknowledge that both will have a responsibility for
improvements along Campbell Avenue and hereby agree to collaborate on the design and
construction of their respective portions of Campbell Avenue improvements so as to achieve
a seamless end product running the length of Campbell Avenue from the east point of
beginning of the Green Crow Campbell Avenue frontage west to Race Street.
The Developer shall maintain the onsite and frontage roadways, in a condition approved by
the City, until such time as all roadway improvements are complete, have been inspected and
accepted by the City, and are approved by the City Council. Such approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
· Streets (Offsite)
Subject to (A) the PRD process and final approval, and (B) timing or phasing of PRD
construction by the Developer, the City agrees to design and construct the following elements
of offsite streets. The City's design and construction of these offsite street improvement
elements will be completed by the City within 12 months of the Developer's completion of
the entire PRD but not sooner then the dates as listed:
The City agrees to design and construct the Campbell Avenue medal (Porter Street west to
Race Street) to a minimum 24 foot paved width (which constitutes a 4 foot widening of the
current roadway) including a 0.1 foot overlay of the minimum 24 foot street, ditches,
culverts, gravel walkway, and driveways.
103
-4-
Design Complete not earlier than March 2005, not later than
July, 2005.
Construct Complete not earlier than August 2005, not later than
September, 2005.
On the understanding and condition that there will be no access to Porter Street in the final
and approved PRD site development plan, the parties agree that no improvements to Porter
Street will be required. However, in the event the final and approved PRD site development
plan includes Porter Street access, then the Developer agrees to design, construct and install
and/or pay their share of reimbursement for any required Porter Street improvements
necessary to allow such access.
· Utilities (Onsite)
The City and the Developer agree to share equally the cost (materials only) for onsite
transformers, provided that the City portion shall not exceed $19,990 total. A transformer
may serve up to 6 single family residences or 1 multi-family residence per transformer.
Transformers will be placed in locations mutually acceptable by both the developer and City.
The Developer shall maintain onsite utilities, in a condition approved by the City, until such
time as all utility improvements are complete, have been inspected and accepted by the City,
and are approved by the City Council. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
· Utilities (Offsite)
Water: At the City's expense, the City agrees to make available adequate
water capacity to the developer's lot line, but no further offsite water
improvements are anticipated.
Sewer: The City agrees to design and construct all offsite sewer infrastructure
from Porter Street to Race Street. The City schedule for design and
construction will be as follows:
Design Complete not earlier than July 2004, and not later than
August, 2004.
Construct Complete not earlier than August 2005, and not later
than September, 2005.
Power At the City's expense, the City agrees to provide adequate power
capacity to the developers lot line, but no offsite power improvements
are anticipated.
104
-5-
· Fire Protection
Fire Hydrants Subject to thc final, approved design of the development, thc City and
the Developer agree that the installation of fire hydrants shall be at
the Developer's expense. The fire hydrants shall be designed and
located per applicable City standards. The City Fire Department shall
work with the Developer to ensure the most efficient and cost
effective design.
Sprinklers Fire sprinklers shall not be required within single family units located
within the proposed development as the development is located
within the City's four-minute response area and will be provided with
sufficient fire flow.
Fire sprinklers will be required in all multi-family units.
The City agrees to provide a fire sprinkler subsidy of $500 per single
family household, and $200 per unit for multi-family buildings up to
a total of 15 units~ ($3,000 maximum subsidy per multi-family
building).
· Open Space and Parks Facilities
Subject to thc PRD process and final approval, thc Developer agrees to dedicate
approximately 2 acres of park and other open space within thc development to the City for
thc purposes of public recreation and trail usc. Thc layout, design and funding of the park
and open space to bc dedicated to thc City shall bc subject to thc approval of thc Port
Angeles City Council.
In collaboration with the City Parks and Recreation Department, the Developer agrees to
perform preliminary site preparation for eventual development of the dedicated site as a
future City park. Site preparation will include rough grading necessary to prepare this site
to eventually contain traditional neighborhood park elements including children's play
equipment, open space and lawn areas suitable for informal play not limited to youth
baseball, softball and soccer practice, small basketball court, landscaping, picnic tables,
benches and walking paths.
A power, water and sewer connection stub shall be installed in a location mutually acceptable
to both the developer and the City to enable future development of a public restroom to serve
the park site.
I The State building code mandates instal/at/on of an approved fire sprinkler system for multi-family residential
building with more than 15 units. Recognizing that, the fire sprinkler subsidy offered by the City is limited to multi-family
buildings with 15 un/ts or fewer un/ts.
105
-~-
The Developer and the City agree that the City will be responsible for the future, final
development of this dedicated site as a neighborhood park to serve the Mt Angeles
neighborhood at such time as the City has the resources to construct and maintain the site.
· Timing of Improvements
Developer agrees to have Phase 1 of the approved subdivision completed within 18 months
of signing of this Development Agreement and Phase 2 completed within 36 months of
signing of this Agreement.
Further, the Developer agrees to make application for the Campbell Avenue PRD within 6
months of signing o£this Agreement and to have Phase 1 completed within 36 months of
signing of this Agreement.
If thc project continues to be economically viable, developer agrees to have entire project
completed within 6 years of signing of this Agreement.
If£or any reason costs of the project, per lot, become too high to be economically viable for
thc developer, then City and Developer may negotiate a mutually agreeable amendment(s)
to the Development Agreement in an effort to work together to find ways to complete the
project, at a mutually reasonable cost.
G:~LEGAL~Planning\Cn'een Crow\CJ-reenCrow part B.#5.wpd
June 24, 2004 (1 l:48am), June 29, 2004 (10:55) July 9, 2004 (4:30)
July 14, 2004 (1:40)
106
-7-
ORTANG.ELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: July 20, 2004
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT: Solid Waste Export and Transfer Station System Interlocal Agreements
Summary: A Solid Waste Export and Transfer Station System Interlocal Agreement has been prepared in
cooperation with the City of Sequim and Clallam County. A decision by the City of Sequim to accept the
interlocal agreement is anticipated no later than July 15, 2004. Due to the timing of Sequim's decision,
staff prepared two versions of the agreement for City Council consideration, one including Sequim, the
other without Sequim. The agreement most appropriate will be utilized.
Recommendation: Approve the interlocal agreements and authorize the Mayor to sign the
appropriate interlocal agreement based on the City of Sequim's decision. It is also recommended
staff be authorized to make minor non-material changes to the agreement prior to signing, as
, approved by the Mayor, if necessary.
Background/Analysis: The City, County and City of Sequim have continued negotiation of an interlocal
agreement (agreement) for a solid waste export and transfer station system (SWETSS) to replace the Port
Angeles Landfill function. The County and City staff concurred on the agreement which was approved
by City Council on June 8, 2004. The City Council also authorized staffto proceed with the Solid Waste
Processing Facility Development and Management Services Request for Proposals (RFP) on June 8,
2004.
A decision by the City of Sequim to accept the agreement is anticipated no later than July 15, 2004. The
Peninsula Daily News (July 15, 2004) stated in an article that the City of Sequim would possibly be
considering the agreement at a work session on July 21, 2004. This was not able to be confirmed at the
time this memo was drafted. A decision by the County to accept the proposed revisions to the agreement
is anticipated on July 20, 2004. Execution of the agreement prior to soliciting proposals under the RFP is
needed to ensure favorable pricing from contractors. Advertisement of the Request for Proposals is
anticipated on July 25, 2004. The agreement was revised at the request of the City of Sequim and the
County after it was approved by City Council. In addition to the revisions requested by Sequim, other
revisions are recommended based on whether Sequim accepts or rejects the agreement.
If Sequim does not accept the agreement they will not be part of the Joint Solid Waste Advisory Board.
Prior to City and County consideration of an amendment to the agreement at a later date to include
Sequim, Sequim will be required to adopt a resolution designating the regional system as their system,
adopt revised zoning codes to prohibit development of duplicate facilities, and approve a disposal district.
On July 13, 2004, the Utility Advisory Committee reviewed the proposed revisions to the agreements and
recommended City Council approval.
Attachments: Interlocal Agreement (with Sequ~7
Interlocal Agreement (without Sequim)
(WITH SEQUIM)
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING
REGIONAL SOLID WASTE EXPORT AND TRANSFER SYSTEM
COOPERATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
THIS AGREEMENT is executed by and among Clallam County ("County") and
the Cities of Port Angeles and Sequim (the "Cities") (the County and the Cities are
collectively referred to herein as "the Parties") for the purposes of providing for
competitively-priced regional solid waste export and transfer system facilities and
services; promoting the health, safety and welfare of the County's and Cities' residents;
and protecting the natural environment throughout the County. The Parties enter into this
Interlocal Agreement ("Agreement") effective as of the date set forth in Section 9(A) for
the purposes and under the terms contained herein.
WHEREAS, the Parties have cooperated in developing and implementing the
County's Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan ("the Plan") pursuant to
Chapters 35.21, 36.58 and 70.95 RCW on behalf of the County and the Cities; and
WHEREAS, the Plan recommends exporting solid waste to meet future disposal
needs of the residents, businesses, visitors and institutions within the Cities and the
County; and
WHEREAS, the Plan recommends using interlocal agreements to create the
institutional arrangements needed to implement the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Plan recommends closing the Port Angeles Sanitary Landfill, the
only operating municipal solid waste landfill in Clallam County serving the area from
Lake Crescent eastward, as depicted in the map and legal description attached hereto as
Exhibit A, when it reaches capacity (projected by the end of 2006), and citing a transfer
station at the Port Angeles Sanitary Landfill, for the purposes of exporting solid waste for
final disposal after the landfill is closed; and
WHEREAS, in anticipation of the closure of the Port Angeles landfill and in
recognition of the absence of alternative local landfill sites, the Parties desire to cooperate
to provide for a Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System consistent with the
Plan; and
WHEREAS, by entering into an interlocal agreement providing for each Party's
cooperation, the Parties can more effectively and efficiently implement the Plan and
procure management of the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System; and
7/15/2004 ] 08 Page 1
WHEREAS, the Plan anticipates that the Regional Solid Waste Export and
Transfer System facilities will be located at the current site of the Port Angeles Sanitary
Landfill, will be operated by the City of Port Angeles or a private company under
contract with the City of Port Angeles, and will be utilized by the Cities, County and by
the private solid waste collection companies that serve the Cities and unincorporated area
of the County from Lake Crescent eastward; and
WHEREAS, the City of Port Angeles has been responsible for accumulating
closure and post-closure funds as required by law for the Port Angeles Landfill; and
whereas the Parties intend for the Regional Solid Waste Transfer and Export System
funding arrangement to provide for any additional funds related to unmet or unanticipated
Port Angeles Landfill requirements provided, however, that this shall not make Clallam
County or the City of Sequim separately or individually obligated for liabilities arising
from Port Angeles' landfill site; and
WHEREAS, the Parties intend that a portion of the tipping fees for the Blue
Mountain Transfer Station be collected to continue to pay for the lease fee and upkeep
costs for this site presently being covered by the Blue Mountain Drop Box fees collected
by the County; and
WHEREAS, the Parties are authorized and empowered to enter into this
Agreement pursuant to Chapters 39.34 and 70.95 RCW.
THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants herein, and in
order to implement the terms of the County's Comprehensive Solid Waste Management
Plan, the Parties agree:
Section 1.
Definitions: Except for the terms defined in this section, and unless the context
indicates otherwise, for the purposes of this Agreement and any related
agreements, the Parties shall use the definitions found in RCW 70.95.030 and
WAC 173-350, as they may be amended.
"Agreement" means this interlocal agreement.
"Cities" means both of the Cities of Port Angeles and Sequim, Washington
(collecti'Cely, the "Cities").
"County" means Clallam County, Washington.
"Ecology" means the Washington State Department of Ecology or its successor
agency.
"Plan" means the Clallam County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
as amended in accordance with this Agreement.
7/15/2004 ] 09 Page 2
"Solid Waste Advisory Committee" is an advisory committee whose members are
appointed by the County Commissioners to advise them on solid waste matters.
"Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System" means the facilities owned
by and/or contracted by, the City of Port Angeles, where deposit, processing,
recycling, composting, moderate-risk waste handling, and transfer of solid waste
for disposal through a long-haul contract occurs. This will include the Blue
Mountain drop-box site, facilities, and operations, unless the Board of Clallam
County Commissioners determines in its sole discretion at any time during the
term of this agreement that the Blue Mountain drop-box facilities should no
longer be operated.
"Vendor" means either the City of Port Angeles or any company or person with
whom the City of Port Angeles contracts for any or all of the design, construction,
ownership, or operation of the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System.
Section 2. Responsibilities of the County. The County shall:
A. Process consideration of amendments to the Plan that are submitted by the
Joint Solid Waste Advisory Board to the Solid Waste Advisory Committee
to provide for disposal of all non-recyclable solid waste generated in the
unincorporated areas of the County from Lake Crescent eastward at the
Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System site(s) to the extent
permitted by law. The Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System
will be the only designated Export and Transfer System in the County East
of Lake Crescent for the term of this Agreement.
B. Process consideration of amendments to the County's zoning code, solid
waste facility permitting process ordinance, and other applicable
ordinances to prohibit solid waste transfer and export facilities that are not
consistent with the Plan and to designate the Regional Solid Waste Export
and Transfer System as the County's solid waste system consistent with
the Plan and RCW 36.58.040, to the extent permitted by law.
C. Make a good faith effort to negotiate and execute with Jefferson County
an interlocal agreement requiring each county to amend its comprehensive
solid waste management plan and other related ordinances and
agreements, to the extent permitted by law, to prohibit accepting waste
generated outside its boundaries at disposal sites within said county;
unless approved as an emergency.
D. Consider forming a solid waste disposal district in the eastern part of the
County, to the extent it may become necessary to provide a dedicated
7/15/2004 'l 'l 0 Page 3
source of funds to help finance the capital and operations and maintenance
costs associated with the Solid Waste Export and Transfer System.
E. Shall not construct or have constructed any municipal solid waste export
and transfer system in the eastern part of Clallam County without the
approval of the Joint Solid Waste Advisory Board.
F. Participate in developing the request for qualifications/proposals and
selecting the contractor(s), for designing, building and if appropriate
operating the Solid Waste Export and Transfer System facilities, disposal
services, and long haul services.
G. Appoint representatives to the Joint Solid Waste Advisory Board.
H. Negotiate and administer the land lease between the County and the
Washington Department of Natural Resources enabling the continuation of
drop box services at Blue Mountain.
I. Encourage recycling efforts to the maximum extent possible for yard
debris, special wastes, and CDL (construction, demolition, and land
clearing waste) programs to minimize the amounts of material for waste
export.
Section 3. Responsibilities of the City of Port Angeles. The City of Port Angeles
shall:
A. Conduct a procurement process for selecting one or more Vendors to
provide solid waste export and transfer system facilities, services to
operate the facilities if appropriate, disposal services, and long-haul
services consistent with the Plan;
B. In consultation and cooperation with the County and the City of Sequim,
either provide itself, or enter into and administer a contract with one or
more Vendors for, solid waste export and transfer system, and disposal
services for the Parties consistent with the Plan; and
C. In consultation and cooperation with the County and the City of Sequim
and the City of Port Angeles establish a Joint Solid Waste Advisory Board
that will review policies, procedures, costs, rates and will operate as an
advisory group to the City of Port Angeles.
D. Provide administrative service related to the operation of the Regional
Solid Waste Export and Transfer System site(s) and long-haul service
including but not limited to:
7/15/2004 '1 '[ '1 Page 4
1. Act as custodian of the Regional Solid Waste Export and
Transfer System/landfill enterprise fund created under this
Agreement.
2. Incorporate in its annual budget the budget for Regional
Solid Waste Export and Transfer System services under
this Agreement including, but not limited to revenues,
administrative costs of the Parties, direct costs, indirect
costs according to approved cost allocation plans, personnel
services, insurance and land leases.
3. For facilities that are operated by the City of Port Angeles
as part of the solid waste export and transfer system,
provide for administrative service including, but not limited
to personnel services and insurance.
E. Provide a site at the existing site of the Port Angeles Sanitary Landfill for
the regional Solid Waste Export System facilities at no cost to the Parties.
F. The Blue Mountain operations and facilities will be included in the
enterprise fund of the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System
with consideration of increased service, if approved by the Joint Solid
Waste Advisory Committee.
G. Direct solid waste collected within the City of Port Angeles (whether
collected directly by the City of Port Angeles or by a solid waste
collection company) to the Vendor selected through the procurement
process; take reasonable action to enforce such direction, including but not
limited to entering into a long term contract that requires disposal of solid
waste generated in the City of Port Angeles at the Regional Solid Waste
Export and Transfer System facilities; and if the City of Port Angeles
ceases to operate its own solid waste collection system, then the City shall
require that any contract with solid waste haulers provides that solid
waste hauled is disposed of at the Regional Solid Waste Export and
Transfer System facilities consistent with the Plan.
H. Process consideration of an ordinance designating the Regional Solid
Waste Export and Transfer System as the City's solid waste system
consistent with the Plan and RCW 35.21.120, and amendments to the
City's zoning code and other applicable ordinances to prohibit solid waste
facilities that are not consistent with the Plan.
I. Cooperate with the County in the formation of a disposal district to the
extent the district includes incorporated areas of the City of Port Angeles.
7/15/2004 ] '1 2 Page 5
J. Encourage recycling efforts to the maximum extent possible for yard
debris, special wastes, and CDL (construction, demolition, and land
clearing waste) programs to minimize the amounts of material for waste
export.
Section 4. Responsibilities of the City of Sequim. The City of Sequim shall:
A. Direct solid waste (except yard debris and composting operations and
materials) collected within the City of Sequim (whether collected directly
by the City of Sequim or by a solid waste collection company) to the
Vendor selected through the procurement process; take reasonable action
to enforce such direction, including but not limited to entering into a long
term contract with the City of Port Angeles for disposal of solid waste
generated in the City of Sequim at the Regional Solid Waste Export and
Transfer System facilities; and if the City of Sequim ceases to operate its
own solid waste collection system, then the City shall require that any
contract with solid waste haulers provides that solid waste hauled is
disposed of at the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System
facilities consistent with the Plan; and
B. Cooperate in implementing Plan elements.
C. Participate in developing the request for qualifications/proposals and
selecting the contractor(s), for designing, building and if appropriate
operating the solid waste facilities.
D. Appoint a representative to the Joint Solid Waste Advisory Board.
E. Process consideration of an ordinance designating the Regional Solid
Waste Export and Transfer System as the City's solid waste system
consistent with the Plan and RCW 35.21.120, and amendments to the
City's zoning code and other applicable ordinances to prohibit solid waste
facilities that are not consistent with the Plan.
F. Cooperate with the County in the formation of a disposal district to the
extent the district includes incorporated areas of the City of Sequim.
G. Encourage recycling efforts to the maximum extent possible for yard
debris, special wastes, and CDL (construction, demolition, and land
clearing waste) programs to minimize the amounts of material for waste
export.
Section 5. Responsibilities of additional parties. Additional parties to this
Agreement shall:
7/15/2004 ] 'l 3 Page 6
A. Direct solid waste (except yard debris and composting operations and
materials) collected within the jurisdictional area of the additional party
(whether collected directly by the additional party or by a solid waste
collection company) to the Vendor selected through the procurement
process; take reasonable action to enforce such direction, including but not
limited to entering into a long term contract with the City of Port Angeles
for disposal of solid waste generated in the jurisdictional area of the
additional party at the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System
facilities; and if the additional party ceases to operate its own solid waste
collection system, then the additional party shall require that any contract
with solid waste haulers provides that solid waste hauled is disposed of at
the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System facilities consistent
with the Plan; and
B. Cooperate in implementing Plan elements.
C. Adopt a resolution by the additional party's governing body approving the
designation of the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System as
the additional party's solid waste system consistent with the Plan and
RCW 35.21.120, and amendments to the additional party's zoning code
and other applicable ordinances to prohibit solid waste facilities that are
not consistent with the Plan. The resolution and amendments to zoning
code and other applicable ordinances shall be made concurrent with or
prior to the additional party accepting an amendment to this Agreement to
include the additional party.
D. Cooperate with the County in the formation of a disposal district including
adoption of a resolution by the additional party's governing body
approving the district to the extent the district includes incorporated areas
of the additional party. The resolution shall be made concurrent with or
prior to the additional party accepting an amendment to this Agreement to
include the additional party.
E. Encourage recycling efforts to the maximum extent possible for yard
debris, special wastes, and CDL (construction, demolition, and land
clearing waste) programs to minimize the amounts of material for waste
export.
Section 6. Duration of Agreement: This Agreement shall be in full force and
effect from and after its effective date, as set forth in Section 9(A), and shall
remain in force for 20 years from the date the Regional Solid Waste Export and
Transfer System first commences commercial operations. Any changes to this
Agreement must be agreed upon by all Parties. This Agreement shall
automatically be extended for a period of five (5) years unless notice is given by
any party to the other parities within eighteen (18) months prior to the expiration
7/15/2004 ] '1 ~[ Page 7
of the original twenty (20) year term, and in writing, that they do not desire to
extend the agreement.
Section 7. Governance and Rates.
A. Joint Solid Waste Advisory Board: A Joint Solid Waste Advisory Board
(JSWAB) shall be established. The Board will be composed of staff from
the Parties to this Agreement. The Board will act as an advisory
committee to the Port Angeles City Council, the Clallam County Solid
Waste Advisory Committee and others as necessary. Although Clallam
County, the City of Sequim, and the City of Port Angeles may each be
represented by multiple members on the JSWAB in accordance with 6(B),
each Party shall only be entitled to a single vote on recommendations to
the Port Angeles City Council, the Clallam County Solid Waste Advisory
Committee and others as necessary.
B. Membership Body: The JSWAB shall consist of the following members:
(1) Director of Public Works Clallam County, (2) Director of Public
Works and Utilities City of Port Angeles, (3) Director of Public Works
City of Sequim, (4) Solid Waste Superintendent City of Port Angeles, (5)
Utilities Division Manager or designee from Clallam County. The Board
shall draw upon other staff members from the agencies as necessary and
appropriate to assist is carrying out its duties.
C. Officers and Procedures: The JSWAB shall select a chair and such other
officers as deemed necessary to conduct business. The Board shall adopt
rules and procedures it deems necessary for the proper and efficient
conduct of its business.
D. Meetings: The JSWAB shall be responsible to fix a time and place for its
meetings.
E. Powers and Duties: The JSWAB shall have the following powers and
duties:
1. Make recommendations for the management and operation
of the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System
operated under this Agreement.
2. Submit budget recommendations to the participating
jurisdictions for action.
3. Review and recommend fees and charges and for services
related to disposal, operation of facilities, transfer and
disposal of solid waste associated with the Regional Solid
7/15/2004 ] ] 5 Page 8
Waste Export and Transfer System, and for disposal
districts.
4. Review and recommend amendments to the Plan to the
Solid Waste Advisory Committee. Review and recommend
amendments to this Agreement to the Parties of this
Agreement.
F. Enterprise Fund: There shall be maintained an enterprise fund separate
from all other funds within the City of Port Angeles into which revenues
received from the Parties to this Agreement, fees, charges, and any other
revenues associated with the operation and management of the Regional
Solid Waste Export and Transfer System shall be deposited. This fund
shall be part of the City of Port Angeles annual budget and administered in
accordance with the City budget regulation and guidelines. Expenditures
from the fund shall be made only for the Solid Waste Export and Transfer
System and landfill projects and closure and post closure costs not
captured during the operation of the landfill activities, including actual
administrative costs of the Parties pursuant to their obligations under this
agreement, the comprehensive solid waste plan, state and federal laws.
G. Costs: The costs of solid waste disposal and management of all Parties to
this Agreement not otherwise reimbursed shall be included in the
operation of the enterprise fund. These costs shall include, but not be
limited to, operation of transfer sites, long haul, recycling operations,
composting, capitalization of facilities and equipment, administrative
costs, planning, and other costs directly related to regional Solid Waste
Export and Transfer System/Landfill operations. The JSWAB shall
determine inclusive costs which shall be fair, reasonable and equitable to
all Parties of this Agreement when making budget recommendations to the
City of Port Angeles City Council.
H. Fees and Charges: Fees for disposal shall be fair, reasonable and equitable
and shall be applied equally throughout the jurisdiction of all participating
Parties at the Port Angeles regional site. Fees shall be determined based
on the cost of service and may be set in various amounts based on
differences in waste types, the type of facility receiving that waste,
commercial and self-haulers, and for any other fair, reasonable and
equitable reason permitted by law. A separate fee structure may be
developed for the Blue Mountain site, which shall be sufficient to cover all
costs associated with operation of the Blue Mountain site. A surcharge or
higher rate may be charged for solid waste collected within jurisdictions
that are not signatories to this Agreement.
Section 8. Access to Records: Duly authorized representative of the Parties to this
Agreement shall have the right to inspect the records of the JSWAB and the
7/15/2004 ] '1 6 Page 9
accounts and records of the City of Port Angeles relating to solid waste disposal
and transfer operations at any reasonable time.
Section 9. Assets and Liabilities: On termination of this Agreement, any assets
owned separately by a Party shall remain the property of that Party. In entering
into this Agreement, no Party assumes liability for the actions or activities of the
other, except as provided by law or as may be agreed by the Parties.
Section 10. Miscellaneous Provisions
A. Effective Date: This Agreement shall take effect the first date on which all
Parties have taken all necessary action to authorize and execute this
Agreement.
B. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only in writing and only
by agreement of all Parties except as set forth in this section. The Parties
hereby agree that this Agreement may be amended to allow any other
governmental entity within Clallam County, including tribes and the Town
of Forks, to join as a party. Additional parties joining shall not be
members of the JSWAB. Additional parties shall be bound by all
provisions of this Agreement.
C. Withdrawal: A Party may withdraw from this Agreement only upon
unanimous agreement of all Parties, which agreement shall provide the
means by which a penalty may be charged for withdrawal from the
agreement by the Parties.
D. Non-Waiver: No waiver by any Party of any term or condition of this
Agreement shall be deemed or construed to constitute a waiver of any
other term or condition or of any subsequent breach whether of the same
or of a different provision of this Agreement.
E. No Third-Party Beneficiary: This Agreement is entered into to protect the
public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the Cities and County
and to promote the effective and efficient disposal or other handling of
solid waste in the Cities and the County. This Agreement is not entered
into with the intent that it shall benefit any party not signing this
Agreement, and no other person or entity shall be entitled to be treated as
a third-party beneficiary of this Agreement.
F. Assignment: Upon the creation of a solid waste disposal district pursuant
to Ch. 36.58 RCW, the County and any City opting into such a disposal
district may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to the
solid waste disposal district. No other assignment of this Agreement is
permitted without the prior written consent of all Parties.
7/15/2004 '1 '] 7 Page 10
G. Severability: If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be
invalid, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.
H. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in two or more
counterparts, and each such counterpart shall be deemed to be an original
instrument. All such counterparts together will constitute one and the
same Agreement.
I. Risk Allocation - Liability: As among the Parties, the City of Port
Angeles shall assume the risk for all activities and liabilities arising from
the ownership and operation of the Regional Solid Waste Export and
Transfer System and the Port Angeles landfill and shall hold harmless
from the defense costs and liability Clallam County and the City of
Sequim, except that Clallam County shall assume the risk from all
activities and liabilities arising from the ownership and operation of the
Blue Mountain facility. It is agreed among the Parties that the cost of
liability insurance for such risk shall be considered an operation cost of the
Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System and that any uninsured
risk which results in a cost to the City and or County may be recovered by
an appropriate increase in rates to cover any uninsured loss.
7/15/2004 'l '[ 8 Page 11
IN WITNESS HEREOF, this Agreement is executed by Clallam County and by the Cities
of Port Angeles and Sequim, Washington.
Dated this __ day of ,2004. Dated this __ day of ,2004.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES CLALLAM COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
Richard Headrick, Mayor Stephen P. Tharinger, Chair
Michael C. Chapman, Commissioner
Howard V. Doherty Jr., Commissioner
Attest: Attest:
Becky Upton, City Clerk Trish Perrott, Clerk of Board
Approved As To Form: Approved As To Form:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney Chris Melly, County Attorney
CITY OF SEQUIM
Walter E. Schubert, Mayor
Attest:
Karen Kuznek, City Clerk
Approved As To Form:
Craig Ritchie, City Attorney
7/15/2004 '[ ] 9 Page 12
(WITHOUT SEQUIM)
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING
REGIONAL SOLID WASTE EXPORT AND TRANSFER SYSTEM
COOPERATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
THIS AGREEMENT is executed by and among Clallam County ("County") and
the City of Port Angeles (the "City") (the County and the City are collectively referred to
herein as "the Parties") for the purposes of providing for competitively-priced regional
solid waste export and transfer system facilities and services; promoting the health, safety
and welfare of the County's and City's residents; and protecting the natural environment
throughout the County. The Parties enter into this Interlocal Agreement ("Agreement")
effective as of the date set forth in Section 9(A) for the purposes and under the terms
contained herein.
WHEREAS, the Parties have cooperated in developing and implementing the
County's Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan ("the Plan") pursuant to
Chapters 35.21, 36.58 and 70.95 RCW on behalf of the County and the City; and
WHEREAS, the Plan recommends exporting solid waste to meet future disposal
needs of the residents, businesses, visitors and institutions within the City and the
County; and
WHEREAS, the Plan recommends using interlocal agreements to create the
institutional arrangements needed to implement the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Plan recommends closing the Port Angeles Sanitary Landfill, the
only operating municipal solid waste landfill in Clallam County serving the area from
Lake Crescent eastward, as depicted in the map and legal description attached hereto as
Exhibit A, when it reaches capacity (projected by the end of 2006), and citing a transfer
station at the Port Angeles Sanitary Landfill, for the purposes of exporting solid waste for
final disposal after the landfill is closed; and
WHEREAS, in anticipation of the closure of the Port Angeles landfill and in
recognition of the absence of alternative local landfill sites, the Parties desire to cooperate
to provide for a Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System consistent with the
Plan; and
WHEREAS, by entering into an interlocal agreement providing for each Party's
cooperation, the Parties can more effectively and efficiently implement the Plan and
procure management of the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System; and
7/15/2004 ] 20 Page 1
WHEREAS, the Plan anticipates that the Regional Solid Waste Export and
Transfer System facilities will be located at the current site of the Port Angeles Sanitary
Landfill, will be operated by the City of Port Angeles or a private company under
contract with the City of Port Angeles, and will be utilized by the City, County and by the
private solid waste collection companies that serve the City and unincorporated area of
the County from Lake Crescent eastward; and
WHEREAS, the City of Port Angeles has been responsible for accumulating
closure and post-closure funds as required by law for the Port Angeles Landfill; and
whereas the Parties intend for the Regional Solid Waste Transfer and Export System
funding arrangement to provide for any additional funds related to unmet or unanticipated
Port Angeles Landfill requirements provided, however, that this shall not make Clallam
County separately or individually obligated for liabilities arising from Port Angeles'
landfill site; and
WHEREAS, the Parties intend that a portion of the tipping fees for the Blue
Mountain Transfer Station be collected to continue to pay for the lease fee and upkeep
costs for this site presently being covered by the Blue Mountain Drop Box fees collected
by the County; and
WHEREAS, the Parties are authorized and empowered to enter into this
Agreement pursuant to Chapters 39.34 and 70.95 RCW.
THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants herein, and in
order to implement the terms of the County's Comprehensive Solid Waste Management
Plan, the Parties agree:
Section 1.
Definitions: Except for the terms defined in this section, and unless the context
indicates otherwise, for the purposes of this Agreement and any related
agreements, the Parties shall use the definitions found in RCW 70.95.030 and
WAC 173-350, as they may be amended.
"Agreement" means this interlocal agreement.
"City" means the City of Port Angeles, Washington.
"County" means Clallam County, Washington.
"Ecology" means the Washington State Department of Ecology or its successor
agency.
"Plan" means the Clallam County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
as amended in accordance with this Agreement.
7/15/2004 ] 2 '1 Page 2
I Waste Advisory Committee" is an advisory committee whose members are
ted by the County Commissioners to advise them on solid waste matters.
~ ~nal Solid Waste Export and Transfer System" means the facilities owned
L ,~ t/or contracted by, the City of Port Angeles, where deposit, processing,
~-~ ..~ ng, composting, moderate-risk waste handling, and transfer of solid waste
L_ - ;posal through a long-haul contract occurs. This will include the Blue
~ ! ain drop-box site, facilities, and operations, unless the Board of Clallam
~ r' Commissioners determines in its sole discretion at any time during the
---~ af this agreement that the Blue Mountain drop-box facilities should no
~ be operated.
or" means either the City of Port Angeles or any company or person with
the City of Port Angeles contracts for any or all of the design, construction,
~hip, or operation of the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System.
~ 2. Responsibilities of the County. The County shall:
Process consideration of amendments to the Plan that are submitted by the
Joint Solid Waste Advisory Board to the Solid Waste Advisory Committee
to provide for disposal of all non-recyclable solid waste generated in the
unincorporated areas of the County from Lake Crescent eastward at the
Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System site(s) to the extent
permitted by law. The Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System
will be the only designated Export and Transfer System in the County East
of Lake Crescent for the term of this Agreement.
Process consideration of amendments to the County's zoning code, solid
waste facility permitting process ordinance, and other applicable
ordinances to prohibit solid waste transfer and export facilities that are not
consistent with the Plan and to designate the Regional Solid Waste Export
and Transfer System as the County's solid waste system consistent with
the Plan and RCW 36.58.040, to the extent permitted by law.
Make a good faith effort to negotiate and execute with Jefferson County
an interlocal agreement requiring each county to amend its comprehensive
solid waste management plan and other related ordinances and
agreements, to the extent permitted by law, to prohibit accepting waste
generated outside its boundaries at disposal sites within said county;
unless approved as an emergency.
Consider forming a solid waste disposal district in the eastern part of the
County, to the extent it may become necessary to provide a dedicated
source of funds to help finance the capital and operations and maintenance
costs associated with the Solid Waste Export and Transfer System.
122 3
E. Shall not construct or have constructed any municipal solid waste export
and transfer system in the eastern part of Clallam County without the
approval of the Joint Solid Waste Advisory Board.
F. Participate in developing the request for qualifications/proposals and
selecting the contractor(s), for designing, building and if appropriate
operating the Solid Waste Export and Transfer System facilities, disposal
services, and long haul services.
G. Appoint representatives to the Joint Solid Waste Advisory Board.
H. Negotiate and administer the land lease between the County and the
Washington Department of Natural Resources enabling the continuation of
drop box services at Blue Mountain.
I. Encourage recycling efforts to the maximum extent possible for yard
debris, special wastes, and CDL (construction, demolition, and land
clearing waste) programs to minimize the amounts of material for waste
export.
Section 3. Responsibilities of the City of Port Angeles. The City of Port Angeles
shall:
A. Conduct a procurement process for selecting one or more Vendors to
provide solid waste export and transfer system facilities, services to
operate the facilities if appropriate, disposal services, and long-haul
services consistent with the Plan;
B. In consultation and cooperation with the County, either provide itself, or
enter into and administer a contract with one or more Vendors for, solid
waste export and transfer system, and disposal services for the Parties
consistent with the Plan; and
C. In consultation and cooperation with the County establish a Joint Solid
Waste Advisory Board that will review policies, procedures, costs, rates
and will operate as an advisory group to the City of Port Angeles.
D. Provide administrative service related to the operation of the Regional
Solid Waste Export and Transfer System site(s) and long-haul service
including but not limited to:
1. Act as custodian of the Regional Solid Waste Export and
Transfer System/landfill enterprise fund created under this
Agreement.
7/15/2004 '1 23 Page 4
2. Incorporate in its annual budget the budget for Regional
Solid Waste Export and Transfer System services under
this Agreement including, but not limited to revenues,
administrative costs of the Parties, direct costs, indirect
costs according to approved cost allocation plans, personnel
services, insurance and land leases.
3. For facilities that are operated by the City of Port Angeles
as part of the solid waste export and transfer system,
provide for administrative service including, but not limited
to personnel services and insurance.
E. Provide a site at the existing site of the Port Angeles Sanitary Landfill for
the regional Solid Waste Export System facilities at no cost to the Parties.
F. The Blue Mountain operations and facilities will be included in the
enterprise fund of the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System
with consideration of increased service, if approved by the Joint Solid
Waste Advisory Committee.
G. Direct solid waste collected within the City of Port Angeles (whether
collected directly by the City of Port Angeles or by a solid waste
collection company) to the Vendor selected through the procurement
process; take reasonable action to enforce such direction, including but not
limited to entering into a long term contract that requires disposal of solid
waste generated in the City of Port Angeles at the Regional Solid Waste
Export and Transfer System facilities; and if the City of Port Angeles
ceases to operate its own solid waste collection system, then the City shall
require that any contract with solid waste haulers provides that solid
waste hauled is disposed of at the Regional Solid Waste Export and
Transfer System facilities consistent with the Plan.
H. Process consideration of an ordinance designating the Regional Solid
Waste Export and Transfer System as the City's solid waste system
consistent with the Plan and RCW 35.21.120, and amendments to the
City's zoning code and other applicable ordinances to prohibit solid waste
facilities that are not consistent with the Plan.
I. Cooperate with the County in the formation of a disposal district to the
extent the district includes incorporated areas of the City of Port Angeles.
J. Encourage recycling efforts to the maximum extent possible for yard
debris, special wastes, and CDL (construction, demolition, and land
clearing waste) programs to minimize the amounts of material for waste
export.
7/15/2004 '1 24 Page 5
Section 4. Responsibilities of additional parties. Additional parties to this
Agreement shall:
A. Direct solid waste (except yard debris and composting operations and
materials) collected within the jurisdictional area of the additional party
(whether collected directly by the additional party or by a solid waste
collection company) to the Vendor selected through the procurement
process; take reasonable action to enforce such direction, including but not
limited to entering into a long term contract with the City of Port Angeles
for disposal of solid waste generated in the jurisdictional area of the
additional party at the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System
facilities; and if the additional party ceases to operate its own solid waste
collection system, then the additional party shall require that any contract
with solid waste haulers provides that solid waste hauled is disposed of at
the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System facilities consistent
with the Plan; and
B. Cooperate in implementing Plan elements.
C. Adopt a resolution by the additional party's governing body approving the
designation of the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System as
the additional party's solid waste system consistent with the Plan and
RCW 35.21.120, and amendments to the additional party's zoning code
and other applicable ordinances to prohibit solid waste facilities that are
not consistent with the Plan. The resolution and amendments to zoning
code and other applicable ordinances shall be made concurrent with or
prior to the additional party accepting an amendment to this Agreement to
include the additional party.
D. Cooperate with the County in the formation of a disposal district including
adoption of a resolution by the additional party's governing body
approving the district to the extent the district includes incorporated areas
of the additional party. The resolution shall be made concurrent with or
prior to the additional party accepting an amendment to this Agreement to
include the additional party.
E. Encourage recycling efforts to the maximum extent possible for yard
debris, special wastes, and CDL (construction, demolition, and land
clearing waste) programs to minimize the amounts of material for waste
export.
Section 5. Duration of Agreement: This Agreement shall be in full force and
effect from and after its effective date, as set forth in Section 9(A), and shall
remain in force for 20 years from the date the Regional Solid Waste Export and
Transfer System first commences commercial operations. Any changes to this
Agreement must be agreed upon by all Parties. This Agreement shall
7/15/2004 '] 25 Page 6
automatically be extended for a period of five (5) years unless notice is given by
any Party to the other parities within eighteen (18) months prior to the expiration
of the original twenty (20) year term, and in writing, that they do not desire to
extend the agreement.
Section 6. Governance and Rates.
A. Joint Solid Waste Advisory_ Board: A Joint Solid Waste Advisory Board
(JSWAB) shall be established. The Board will be composed of staff from
the Parties to this Agreement. The Board will act as an advisory
committee to the Port Angeles City Council, the Clallam County Solid
Waste Advisory Committee and others as necessary. Although Clallam
County and the City of Port Angeles may each be represented by multiple
members on the JSWAB in accordance with 6(B), each Party shall only be
entitled to a single vote on recommendations to the Port Angeles City
Council, the Clallam County Solid Waste Advisory Committee and others
as necessary.
B. Membership Body: The JSWAB shall consist of the following members:
(1) Director of Public Works Clallam County, (2) Director of Public
Works and Utilities City of Port Angeles, (3) Solid Waste Superintendent
City of Port Angeles, (4) Utilities Division Manager or designee from
Clallam County. The Board shall draw upon other staff members from the
agencies as necessary and appropriate to assist is carrying out its duties.
C. Officers and Procedures: The JSWAB shall select a chair and such other
officers as deemed necessary to conduct business. The Board shall adopt
rules and procedures it deems necessary for the proper and efficient
conduct of its business.
D. Meetings: The JSWAB shall be responsible to fix a time and place for its
meetings.
E. Powers and Duties: The JSWAB shall have the following powers and
duties:
1. Make recommendations for the management and operation
of the Regional Solid Waste Export and Transfer System
operated under this Agreement.
2. Submit budget recommendations to the participating
jurisdictions for action.
3. Review and recommend fees and charges and for services
related to disposal, operation of facilities, transfer and
disposal of solid waste associated with the Regional Solid
7/15/2004 '] 26 Page 7
Waste Export and Transfer System, and for disposal
districts.
4. Review and recommend amendments to the Plan to the
Solid Waste Advisory Committee. Review and recommend
amendments to this Agreement to the Parties of this
Agreement.
F. Enterprise Fund: There shall be maintained an enterprise fund separate
from all other funds within the City of Port Angeles into which revenues
received from the Parties to this Agreement, fees, charges, and any other
revenues associated with the operation and management of the Regional
Solid Waste Export and Transfer System shall be deposited. This fund
shall be part of the City of Port Angeles annual budget and administered in
accordance with the City budget regulation and guidelines. Expenditures
from the fund shall be made only for the Solid Waste Export and Transfer
System and landfill projects and closure and post closure costs not
captured during the operation of the landfill activities, including actual
administrative costs of the Parties pursuant to their obligations under this
agreement, the comprehensive solid waste plan, state and federal laws.
G. Costs: The costs of solid waste disposal and management of all Parties to
this Agreement not otherwise reimbursed shall be included in the
operation of the enterprise fund. These costs shall include, but not be
limited to, operation of transfer sites, long haul, recycling operations,
composting, capitalization of facilities and equipment, administrative
costs, planning, and other costs directly related to regional Solid Waste
Export and Transfer System/Landfill operations. The JSWAB shall
determine inclusive costs which shall be fair, reasonable and equitable to
all Parties of this Agreement when making budget recommendations to the
City of Port Angeles City Council.
H. Fees and Charges: Fees for disposal shall be fair, reasonable and equitable
and shall be applied equally throughout the jurisdiction of all participating
Parties at the Port Angeles regional site. Fees shall be determined based
on the cost of service and may be set in various amounts based on
differences in waste types, the type of facility receiving that waste,
commercial and self-haulers, and for any other fair, reasonable and
equitable reason permitted by law. A separate fee structure may be
developed for the Blue Mountain site, which shall be sufficient to cover all
costs associated with operation of the Blue Mountain site. A surcharge or
higher rate may be charged for solid waste collected within jurisdictions
that are not signatories to this Agreement.
Section 7. Access to Records: Duly authorized representative of the Parties to this
Agreement shall have the right to inspect the records of the JSWAB and the
7/15/2004 '127 Page 8
accounts and records of the City of Port Angeles relating to solid waste disposal
and transfer operations at any reasonable time.
Section 8. Assets and Liabilities: On termination of this Agreement, any assets
owned separately by a Party shall remain the property of that Party. In entering
into this Agreement, no Party assumes liability for the actions or activities of the
other, except as provided by law or as may be agreed by the Parties.
Section 9. Miscellaneous Provisions
A. Effective Date: This Agreement shall take effect the first date on which all
Parties have taken all necessary action to authorize and execute this
Agreement.
B. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only in writing and only
by agreement of all Parties except as set forth in this section. The Parties
hereby agree that this Agreement may be amended to allow any other
governmental entity within Clallam County, including the City of Sequim,
tribes and the Town of Forks, to join as an additional party. Additional
parties joining shall not be members of the JSWAB. Additional parties
shall be bound by all provisions of this Agreement.
C. Withdrawal: A Party may withdraw from this Agreement only upon
unanimous agreement of all Parties, which agreement shall provide the
means by which a penalty may be charged for withdrawal from the
agreement by the Parties.
D. Non-Waiver: No waiver by any Party of any term or condition of this
Agreement shall be deemed or construed to constitute a waiver of any
other term or condition or of any subsequent breach whether of the same
or of a different provision of this Agreement.
E. No Third-Party Beneficiary: This Agreement is entered into to protect the
public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City and County
and to promote the effective and efficient disposal or other handling of
solid waste in the City and the County. This Agreement is not entered into
with the intent that it shall benefit any party not signing this Agreement,
and no other person or entity shall be entitled to be treated as a third-party
beneficiary of this Agreement.
F. Assignment: Upon the creation of a solid waste disposal district pursuant
to Ch. 36.58 RCW, the County and any City opting into such a disposal
district may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to the
solid waste disposal district. No other assignment of this Agreement is
permitted without the prior written consent of all Parties.
7/15/2004 ] 28 Page 9
G. Severability: If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be
invalid, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.
H. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in two or more
counterparts, and each such counterpart shall be deemed to be an original
instrument. All such counterparts together will constitute one and the
same Agreement.
I. Risk Allocation - Liability: As among the Parties, the City of Port
Angeles shall assume the risk for all activities and liabilities arising from
the ownership and operation of the Regional Solid Waste Export and
Transfer System and the Port Angeles landfill and shall hold harmless
from the defense costs and liability Clallam County, except that Clallam
County shall assume the risk from all activities and liabilities arising from
the ownership and operation of the Blue Mountain facility. It is agreed
among the Parties that the cost of liability insurance for such risk shall be
considered an operation cost of the Regional Solid Waste Export and
Transfer System and that any uninsured risk which results in a cost to the
City and or County may be recovered by an appropriate increase in rates
to cover any uninsured loss.
7/15/2004 '1 29 Page 10
IN WITNESS HEREOF, this Agreement is executed by Clallam County and by the City
of Port Angeles, Washington.
Dated this __ day of ., 2004. Dated this __ day of ,2004.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES CLALLAM COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
Richard Headrick, Mayor Stephen P. Tharinger, Chair
Michael C. Chapman, Commissioner
Howard V. Doherty Jr., Commissioner
Attest: Attest:
Becky Upton, City Clerk Trish Perrott, Clerk of Board
Approved As To Form: Approved As To Form:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney Chris Melly, County Attorney
7/15/2004 'l ~0 Page 11
ORTANGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: July 20, 2004
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT: Update of Combined Sewer Overflow Directed Actions by Department of Ecology
ISummary: Attached is a summary of actions, and their status, required to meet the Department
of Ecology's CSO requirements.
Recommendation: No action required. Provided for information.
Background/Analysis: City Staff and our consultant, Brown and Caldwell have been
aggressively pursuing accomplishing the DOE required actions within the required timelines. A
table of the required items, actions, and completion dates is attached.
The information is provided for information.
Attach: DOE Actions & Schedule Table
131
N:\CCOUNCIL~F1NAL\CSO Update #2.wpd
RECEI~'ED
JUL 1 2 7004
PIRA 1 st and 2nd Quarterly Reports
January- June 2004 Citv Of Part Anaeles
The web-site has been a focus for PIRA this quarter (http://www. pira.us). Chuck LeBer is
our web master. Our goal for the site is to be able to inform the public about our
activities, post photos of delegation trips and delegations fi.om Japan visiting Port
Angeles. We want to be accessible to our fi'iends in different countries.
There is still a lot of work to be done with site, we are learning the how to do's and feel
that this will be a great tool in the future.
The Jr. Ambassador delegation arrived in January and had an excellent visit. The group
consisted of 5 adults and 8 students. The students and teachers were hosted by families
fi-om Stevens and Roosevelt Middle Schools. PIRA was responsible for the sight seeing
for the adults and a few dinners. We enjoyed the delegation and commented on the
excellent English spoken by the students. It is a delight to prepare for the visits of our
friends in Mutsu City.
The delegation for the spring trip to Mutsu left on May 9. The group representing the city
included Mike Quinn, Mayor Headrick and his wife Camille, and Chuck LeBer
(representing PIRA). The school portion included seven adults and 23 students
representing Stevens and Roosevelt Middle schools and Port Angeles High School.
Reports from the trip have been very positive.
PIRA helped set up money earning activities for many of the students going on the trip,
an Anime movie festival, and scratch and help ticket booklets.
The PIRA / MIRA Summer Institute will take place in Port Angeles July 25th to the 31 ~.
The group will include chaperones Mr. and Mrs. Sasaki and four students. Economic
hardships are keeping the group small this year. We will hold our English, culture day in
the Vern Burton meeting rooms. The schedule will include visiting Hurricane Ridge, the
Fine Arts Center, and a day in Victoria, shopping in Port Angeles and much other sight
seeing adventures. All of the delegation members will be staying with host families. This
is always a very busy week and is a wonderful opportunity to show offour beautiful city
and surrounding area.
We will begin helping with plans for the October visit from Tanabu Senior High School.
They will arrive October 7th, 2004.
Respectively submitted,
Cindy Sofie
PIRA President ] 33
134
WATER DEMAND
_uJ ; :.: :.: .'..-'-.
::.:':.:' :.:':.: :........"
7~' 2003 12004
LAST YEAR TO DATE (MG)
THIS YEAR TO DATE SEWER SYSTEM JETTED
STORM DRAINS JETTED
SYSTEM TV INSPECTED 0
RAINFALL
",~.:.:._~
U~ 5 ~:.:.:.:~
'T' --~ .:,:,:.: ~:.'
~' ':~'~. .......:i:i:i:i .......... i:i:i:!:~
- -:::::::: ....... !: :!: :: ............................... -:!: :i::~ ::::::::
~: ~ "-:':':' _ _~,'.','.'_ ......................... ~,...- ......;.:.:.:..- --
u. -:'.'.',"- .:.'.',' !.: ..:. .'.',','
Z .:':-:': ................ ' · · - ~:-:':':-- ~,~. ,~/:-,,
~: '~::::::: ..... .:.:.:.: ..... ,.1.:.:. :':::::: :.:-:.:.
:. 2003 12004 - 10 Year Average
10 YR AVG. TOTAL TO DATE '
THIS YR TO DATE
135
2003 · 2004
ELECTRICAL
LAST YEAR TO DATE (M Kwh 54.4301
THIS YEAR TO DATE (M 56.0494
TEMPERATURE
;TOTAL LANDFILL DISPOSAL
5
TOTAL CITY TONS 41.7%
F'HIS YR TO DATE (TONS)
LAST YR TO DATE 4
14.0%
CO. RES. HAUL
I CITY OF SEQUIM
10.6%
3
8.7%
CO. COM. HAUL
2 D.M./OLYMPIC DISPOSAL
24.9%
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
QUARTERLY REPORT
Installed 17 new 1" x 5/8" water services and three new 1 x 3/4" services Benefit Dump Day; Quarterly meeting with Waste Management
* Repaired 24 water service leaks, and renewed 6 service lines Developed Interlocal Agreements and Waste Export System Req. for Proposals
Repaired one 1," five 2," two 6," and one 8" water main breaks Collected 280 tons for recycling and 497 tons of yard waste
Changed out one 1," one 2," and twelve l"x 5/8" inoperable water meters Awarded bid on Compost Facility upgrades
Dropped in two I x 5/8" water meters into existing water services Hired Waste Reduction Specialist; Attended SWAC meetings
* Completed 197 utility locates, two hot taps, and six fire hydrant repairs Reviewed Landfill closure and post closure costs
Collected 60 water samples for lead and copper testing Attended VVildlife Management meeting; Quarterly meeting with Murray's Dispo.,
Extended 2" water main on Campbell Ave 60' and replaced line on E. 2nd St. Processed 117 new requests for recycle bins
Completed second quarter Spill Drill
Removed Magna Drive unit from Pump Station ~ for rebuild (warranty) ° Repaired asphalt at 22 Water & Sewer Utility Cuts, patched potholes citywide
Installed two new check valves at Pump Station #2; Jetted monthly lines Excavated, reballasted, and repaved Front Street at Chambers, Liberty & Franc
* Installed valve at Railroad & Oak to keep seawater out of sanitary sewer systerr Crack sealed west side of Lincoln from Front Street to First Street
* Assisled with Spill Drill; Pumped out holding tank at compost building * Repaired concrete at 11 Water & Sewer Utility Cuts
Assisted with sewer tap; Raised weir 4" at Lincoln & 2nd St CSO site * Replaced one 4'x4' and one 5'x10' broken sidewalk panels on Front Street
Completed utility locates as requested & inspected combined sewer overflow sites Filled in 5'x30'x2' pit at the Service Garage; Replaced Handi-Cap ramp on Cede
* Worked on stainless steel lids for sewer pump station on Ediz Hook Removed trees in right of way at Wabash St. and in 12/13 alley west of Cedar
* Installed new sewer lateral; Repaired sewer at 5/6 alley; Trained on Vector truck * Cleaned up illegally dumped vehicles at 17th & B and at Oak & Cherry Streets
Pumped out stormwater retention pond at the landfill for annual inspection * Citywide-mowed/graded/graveledlgroundleducted/sweptlapplied dust control ag
* Assisted Solid Waste with residential collections and Benefit Dump Day
~ASTEWATEE TR~TMENT Cleaned up oil spill from refuse truck; Built retaining wall for Solid Waste
NPDES monthly reports showed no violations * Remodeled Vern Burton (turn bathrooms into storage rooms)
Worked with local dischargers on pretreatment issues * Remodeled Equipment Services (turn storage into office)
Performed process control on secondary treatment system Repaired roof drain at downtown breezeway & fence on Ediz Hook at radio tow~
Completed weekly O & M on Landfill leachate collection and treatment system General sign, building, and key maintenance, and curb painting - citywide
Ecology performed annual inspection and certified VVW"rP for 2004 Repaired guardrail on west 8th Street Bridge; Removed trees in planting strip
Completed monthly EPA and DOE testing and monitoring Built traffic control plans and support for detours for 8th St. bridge closure
Installed interim baffles at all CSO locations and additional signs at public CSO sites Installed 20 signs and performed maintenance on 21 type II barricades
Dewatered, cleaned and repaired gravity thickener, leachate ponds & circular clarifer Assisted with special events: Jazz in the Olympics, Lincoln Park Junior Fishing
Installed fiberglass boiler line to Solids Handling Bldg; Sampled Landfill groundwater Derby, Mustangs at the Courthouse, 4th of July parade, & Juan De Fuca Festiw
Removed #2 primary effluent motor for bearing replacement, cleaning & testing Painted parking lots at the Senior Center, Shane Park, Light Operations, City
* Attended PNCWA Olympic section meeting and short school Hall, Erickson Park, Haynes Park and Civic Field
* Work Orders: 496 Service Requests from Derivers Tire: 104
* Service Orders: 103 Full maintenance services by Denvers: 34 8th St Bridge Replcemnt design support
* TOTAL WORK ORDERS: 737 * Circuit Switcher completed
, Eiwha Dam removal mitigation support
* Presented a Procuremenl Workshop for local dealership representatives Concrete Cylinder Pipe Replacement awarded
Completed implementation of H.T.E. Fleet module Gateway Project design support
New vehicle acquisitions of 21 vehicles Fairmount Pump Station awarded
Wrote specifications for sweeper, refuse truck, video inspection {water), etc. Pump Station 1 & 3 advertised
Replacing part-time mechanic - changing to Service Writer position Electrical Underground Rebuild Elwha Line construction support; Phase II aware
Purchased equipment for Police vehicle * Park Avenue Sewer design support
Began drafting vehicle replacement plan * Peabody Street awarded
Carnegie Library construction completed
Fire Hall Roof Repair design construction support
150 meters were tested and replaced Downtown Signals construction support
47 street lights were repaired; 202 locates were completed City Pier design support
73 electrical inspections were performed Oaks Street sewer repair design
Started and continuing work on 'F' Street Substation Landfill Closure/Transfer Station support
Started and completed Elwha Cable Replacement, Phase I 2004 CFP & TIP completed
Completed Laurel and Washington Substation projects Composting improvements awarded
Downlown Phase III design started
137
138
ORTANGELES:
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: July 20, 2004
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Sue Roberds, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: Department of Community Development
Planning Division June, 2004 - Monthly Report
CURRENT PLANNING APPLICATIONS: CURRENT MONTH 2004YTD 2003 YTD
Rezone 0 1 0
Municipal Code Amendment 0 0 0
Conditional Use Permit 1 4 7
Conditional Use Permit Extension 0 0 0
Conditional Use Permit Appeal 0 0 0
Annexation 0 0 0
Municipal Code Amendment 0 0 0
Subdivision 2 9 1
Binding Site Plan 0 1 0
Short Plat 0 I 0
Appeal of Short Subdivision Decision 0 0 0
Boundary Line Adjustment 0 5 5
Home Occupation Permit 0 2 2
Retail Stand Permit 0 0 1
Bed and Breakfast Permit 0 0 1
Variance 1 2 6
Minor Deviation 0 0 0
Street Vacation 1 1 0
Parking Variance 0 0 0
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 1 5 2
Shoreline Exemption 2 3 0
Wetland Permit 0 1 0
Environmentally Sens. Areas 3 3 1
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY:
Determinations of NonSignificance 9 17 17
Mitigated Determinations of NonSignificance 0 0 0
Determinations of Significance 0 0 0
SEPA Appeal 0 0 0
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIONS:
Building Permit 12 54 59
Code Enforcement ] 396 10 1
Clearing and Grading Permit 0 O 0
38 119 101
~j i~I I~~' ~ ~ ii, i , ii I' ,i I, i I , ' oI~I
i ' i i i '
i ...-- , ; i i i i
· ' i -" l
! J j J j J I i 'i , I J I l
j j l
j i j i i J ' ' ~ j j i J j i j jj
i' ' j i J J j j 1
~ I I , i J , j J i i I I ~
; , j J j J i 'ii
~ j j j j i - J ' j j
J I J J J ~ ...- j J i J J Oj~t
< J i J ; j j i j j , j j j
; i J i i J
~ . I iB, Jo
, j. l- i- J ~ ~ ! I ! ~ , i ! J~l
! i i~ , I~i j ~ J J l~I i ~ ' J J~J ~
' J J J. J j J J J - lm J J j i~j I j ~ J'J ~ ~
' 7~7~J i' i I i , , , ~ ~ i , . ,, :_
- i .,,, ,., ,,,, I .',:.
j J J J j j j j I j J j j~ i j , j: ~
- I~ '~ '~J ' I ' ' ' J J
~ J ~ ~ l~
, j~
.... i i
z ~! ~i ~
~i~i
~JOJ ~ ~ '
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
June 23, 2004
6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Bob Philpott, Fred Norton, Linda Nutter, Leonard
Rasmussen, Dylan Honnold
Members Excused: Fred Hewins, Chuck Schramm
Staff Present: Brad Collins, Scott Johns, Jim Mahlum, Steve Sperr
Public Present: Bob Coons, Darrel Vincent, Betty Borhs, Tylor Ahlgren, Bill
Webb, Dean Reed, John McKee, Bill Dawson
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Philpott moved to approve the June 9, 2004, meeting minutes. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Norton and passed 5 - 0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Vice Chair Rasmussen indicated that those who testify must sign the "Sign In" log and affirm
that their testimony will be truthful to the best of their knowledge.
EXTENSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CUP 03-06 - PA FARMER'S
MARKET, Laurel Street: Extension of Saturday farmer's market activity in the Central
Business District. (Continued to the July 28 meeting.)
Director Collins explained that the applicants have been working with the Port Angeles
Downtown Association on a survey of the last year's impact on business due to the market use on
Saturdays, and asked that this item be continued to the July 28 meeting in order to have the results
of the survey. Vice Chair Rasmussen opened the public heating. Commissioner Nutter moved to
continue the public hearing to the July 28, 2004, meeting. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Honnold and passed 5 - 0.
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - VINCENT - 2500 Block West l0th Street:
Reconsideration of a 12-unit preliminary subdivision on a 5 acre property in the RS-9
Residential Single Family zone.
Assistant Planner Sue Roberds reviewed the Department's memorandum regarding review
of the preliminary subdivision and referred to the April 14, 2004, staff report for additional
background information. Director Collins added that the only issue that the City will monitor in this
subdivision development is off-site drainage. Site engineering will require that off-site drainage not
Planning Commission Minutes
June 23, 2004
Page 2
increased as a result of site development and may not exceed the levels that occur prior to
development. Vice Chair Rasmussen opened the public hearing.
Darrel Vincent, 711 East Front Street, Port Angeles, }VA had no further comment on the
application but thanked staff for their assistance in working through the site development issues.
Bob Coons, 1017 Flores, Port Angeles, }VA noted his written comments and expressed
criticizm of the subdivision process in that he has been unable to identify where his property line is
and what the remaining distance will be to existing structures when development of the adjoining
right-of-way is complete. He is aware that development of his property includes a good deal of the
City right-of-way and that, if the right-of-way is developed as a street, most of his yard is in danger
of being exposed or developed as right-of-way. He asked that a condition that a ditch not be
developed along his side of the right-of-way and that vegetation along the undeveloped portion of
the Milwaukee Drive right-of-way remain undisturbed or be replaced to act as a natural barrier to
his property. Without a survey, answers are not available to identify impacts to his property. No
engineering report has been prepared and he is concerned that stormwater and visual impacts will
impose very negative impacts to his property. He explained that water has been known to stand two
to three feet deep for months on properties in the area. Without being able to review engineering
designs for development of the right-of-way and stormwater impacts following development, he felt
unable to provide adequate comment on the application. While he realizes that it is unlikely that the
City will actually develop the full 100-foot right-of-way width of Milwaukee Drive, he is concerned
that the heavy vegetation barrier will be decimated and he will be left looking at a 250-foot of
roadway. He asked for mitigation of the visual impacts that will be caused by development in the
area by conditioning the project such that the developer provide plants such as photina that he will
plant and maintain in lieu of the natural vegetation.
In response to a question from Commissioner Philpott, by the use of an overhead display, Mr.
Collins identified where structures in the area lay in relation to the Milwaukee Drive right-of-way.
For the most part, encroachments into the right-of-way are yards with the exception of one small
storage building on Mr. Coons' neighbor's property. If developed to full width, right-of-way in the
area would occupy most of Mr. Coons' yard; however, normally speaking, unused right-of-way can
be maintained by an adjoining property owner.
Mr. Collins noted that the engineering reports that Mr. Coons is asking for are not required
until after preliminary approval. As the reports are developed, the City's Engineering Department
will try to work with the neighbors to advise them of options and to try to come up with a plan that
minimizes any negative impacts to properties in the area. Mr. Collins indicated that a condition
could be added to require a meeting during the design process between the Engineering Department
and the neighbors to discuss development of the street and stormwater drainage issues.
Commissioner Nutter agreed and suggested that two meetings be required with the neighborhood.
Commissioner Norton agreed that there should be a condition to work with the neighborhood,
but didn't think that the number of meetings should be dictated as it borders on micro-management.
John McKee, 1028 Flores, Port Angeles, WA identified his property on the overhead
display. Of the 4.11 acres that he owns, a good deal of water, up to 1'6" of standing water is normal
for several months during the winter. Huge amounts of water flow across his property during the
year. He found it difficult to believe that benchmark can be established for what a normal amount
of water is with so much water running in the area. With so much water apparent on his property,
who will determine if more water results from the development? The Milwaukee Railroad right-of-
way is raised in the area some 5' above grade so the development of a a ditch will do no good.
lZ 2
?[annfng CommisMon Mt'nutes
June 23, 2004
Page $
Mr. Coons pointed out that some years ago the City dug a ditch in the area from West 10th
Street and directed water runoff down Milwaukee Drive to West 10th Street.
Jim Mahlum, Civil Engineer, City Public Works and Utilities Department, noted that one of
the challenges facing the applicant's engineer will be to develop the stormwater drainage on the site
to pre-European conditions. Such design will help the entire area because planning and engineering
is required to handle water at fully forested, undeveloped conditions for a 25-year storm event -
which is a great deal of water. No plan is currently in place.
Director Collins noted that even with engineering designed to the pre-European conditions,
given the conditions that Mr. McKee described for his property, required site engineering will not
fix the water problems in the area. However, such engineering should ensure that an increase in
water in the area is not due to development of the site. Existing development will continue to see
an excess of water without the engineering and implementation measures that will be required of Mr.
Vincent due to his planned development as existing homes were not required to be developed to
today's standards.
There being no further testimony, Vice Chair Rasmussen closed the public hearing.
Following discussion on the issues previously discussed, Commissioner Norton
recommended approval of the preliminary subdivision subject to the following conditions,
findings, and conclusions:
Conditions:
1. The interior cul-de-sac shall be named Adelaide Drive, dedicated, and constructed per the
City's urban service standards, which includes a 20' asphalt surface with ditches and a
minimum 4' pedestrian walking path separated from the roadway by the ditch prior to
approval of the final plat. Signage shall be placed on the interior cul-de-sacs indicating that
on-street parking is prohibited along both sides of the street.
2. Twenty-four (24') foot of paving is required along the subdivision frontage of Milwaukee
Drive per the City's Arterial Street Standards with an 8' walking path and ditching as
prescribed in the City's low impact development standards east to meet the improved street
surface on Milwaukee Drive. No improvement is required to West Tenth Street. Street trees
shall be planted along the arterial per the City's Urban Services and Guidelines Policy
3G. 100 Street Trees and Landscaping.
3. Fire hydrants shall be placed and spaced as required by the City's Fire Department to a
maximum 1000' of separation distance. Wording shall be placed on the final plat and
recorded with the County Auditor upon filing of the final subdivision indicating that all
residences shall be fitted with residential sprinkler systems prior to occupancy.
4. Electric utility service shall be underground.
5. Prior to final plat approval, an 8 inch water service shall be extended to the lots as required
by the Public Works and Utilities Department.
143
Planning Commission Minutes
June 23, 2004
Page 4
6. Stormwater improvement plans shall be submitted for approval per the City's Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines and installed prior to final plat approval. The subdivision shall be
redesigned to be approved by the City to accommodate existing stormwater drainage needs
and may result in the reduction to 11 lots. No net increase from existing drainage will be
allowed following development.
7. Sanitary sewer and water shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works
Department from Milwaukee Drive.
8. Building setback areas shall be identified on the final plat and address numbers provided by
the City's Building Division shall be placed on the lots.
9. The Department of Public Works and Utilities shall schedule a preliminary design meeting
for Milwaukee Drive improvements with the applicant, the applicant's engineer, adjacent
neighbors, and the City's engineering staff to review design issues and schedule a final
design meeting with interested parties to identify the improvements before installation
Occurs.
Findings:
1. Preliminary approval is for an 11- 12-unit subdivision submitted by Darrel Vincent on
February 20, 2004, identified as being in Suburban Lot 57 within the Townsite of Port
Angeles. The approximately 5 acre site is located south of Milwaukee Drive west of West
Tenth Street.
2. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Single Family
Residential (RS-9) which allows a density of up to 9 units per acre. The preliminary drawing
indicates that the proposed development will result in an approximate density of 2.5 units per
acre.
3. Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) sets forth local requirements for
the approval of subdivisions and Section 16.08.050(B)(1) PAMC provides that the Planning
Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written recommendations of the
City Departments, and shall either approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation
thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a period ofg0 days after a preliminary
plat has been submitted to the City Planning Department. The City Council shall either
approve or disapprove the proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting.
4. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform
division of land within the State. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire into the public
use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision and determine
if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, and
general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys and other public
ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, and schools and shall consider all other relevant facts including sidewalks and
Planning Commission Minutes
June 23, 2004
Page 5
other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who onlywalk to and
from school and whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision. A proposed
subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written findings that these
provisions are made.
5. The proposal was reviewed with regard to the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Section 16.08
PAMC) which provides specific design standards which are expected of subdivisions within
the City limits while the City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines indicates that street
trees should be planted along arterial streets and provides guidance for such placement and
tree species. The City's Urban Services and Guidelines Standards (Section 3G. 100 Street
Trees and Landscaping) suggests that street trees should be planted on arterial streets in the
City and in other specified areas. The design standards identified in Section 16.08.060 F
PAMC state that street trees are a protection against excessive heat and glare and enhance
the attractiveness and value of abutting property. The City will assist the subdivider in
location of trees and species to use under varying conditions. It is recommended that trees
be planted inside the property lines where they are less subject to injury, decrease the chance
of motor accidents and enjoy more favorable conditions for growth. If trees are to be
planted within a planting strip in the right-of-way, their proposed locations and species to be
used are to be submitted for review and approval by the City.
6. Section 16.08 PAMC states that the final plat shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department within five years after City Council approval of the preliminary
plat. Said preliminary approval shall become void unless a final plat is submitted and
approved by the City within the five year period.
7. The Port Angeles Public Works, Light, Parks, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed
subdivision and their comments and specific conditions have been incorporated in the
Department's recommendation. Water, power, garbage pickup, telecommunications, sewer,
stormwater, streets, and emergency services are available within acceptable standards to the
site or will be extended through conditions to the preliminary plat.
8. The subject property is identified as Low Density Residential (LDR) on the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan land use map.
9. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency at the time of development for streets, water
service, sanitary sewer service, and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9)
and should require concurrency at the time of development for solid waste collection,
stormwater management, telecommunications service, and emergency service (Capital
Facilities Element Policy A. 10). The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the
Comprehensive Plan and the following Comprehensive Plan policies are relevant to the
proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A.2,
Goal B, Policy B. 1, B.2, B.3, and B.4, Goal C; Transportation Element Goal A, Policy A.3,
A.6, B.10, B.11, B.14, and B.18; Utilities and Public Services Element Policy C.2; Capital
Facilities Element Goal A, B, Policy B.1, B.3, B.4, B.5, B.6, B.7, C.2, C.3, C.4, and C.5.
145
Planning Commission Minutes
June 23, 2004
Page 6
10. The purpose of the City's RS-9, Residential Single Family zone is a low density residential
zone intended to create and preserve urban single family residential neighborhoods
consisting of predominantly single family homes on larger than standard Townsite-size lots.
Uses that are compatible with and functionally related to a single family residential
environment may be located in this zone. Because of land use impacts associated with
nonresidential uses, few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and then only
conditionally. This zone provides for a variety in the urban land use pattern for the City's
single family residential neighborhoods, following a curvilinear street system ofnonthrough
public and private streets with irregularly shaped lots, minimum 75-foot front lot lines, and
60-foot rights-of-way for collector arterial streets in large rectangular blocks and usually
located in outlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable land.
11. The site is currently served by unimproved Milwaukee Drive and West Tenth Street which
are local access streets. Milwaukee Drive is also a designated bicycle route. "N" Street east
of the site is a collector arterial and a designated school walking route. Improvements to
Milwaukee Drive improvements will be required such that the final street is an improved
width of 24' with a ditch and 8' pedestrian walking path established on the south side per the
City's new suburban low impact development standards connected to improved West Tenth
Street.
12. The City's low impact development standards for suburban areas were adopted in 2003 with
the understanding that subdivisions developed under the reduced standards would not allow
for on-street parking. Site development and design for residential lots developed under the
lower impact standards need to accommodate resident parking and visitor parking on-site.
Roadside ditches developed under low impact development standards should be kept free of
debris by adjacent property owners.
13. There are no environmentally sensitive areas on the site although the site has historically had
some standing groundwater areas probably due to the rise of the Milwaukee Railroad grade
along the site's north boundary. The site slopes west to southwest. The site is not listed on
the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) maps which denote those properties that
are within 100-year flood areas.
14. The owner of a construction site which disturbs a total of five acres or more of land area that
has a discharge of stormwater to a surface water or storm sewer system must apply to the
State Department of Ecology for a General Permit for Stormwater Discharge Associated with
Construction Activities.
15. Building permits are required for all structures within the subdivision. All local building and
Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler
systems.
16. The Port Angeles School District has been notified of the development to allow them to plan
for needed public school facilities and routes. School busses travel along West Tenth Street.
Hamilton School is the closest school to the site.
1,16
Planning Commission Minutes
dune 23, 2004
Page 7
17. The City's Parks Department responded that they are aware of the preliminary proposal and
do not believe the level of service for the area will be hampered as a result of the
development. The City's LOS for parks and recreational services is 1/3 acre for 1,000
population. An undeveloped wooded property donated to the City for a park use is located
approximately 1/4 mile east of the subject site along "N" Street. The nearest public
playground area is located approximately one-half mile + north at Crown Park.
18. The site will be serviced by the City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments. All
utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the
area. Transit service is available along "N" Street east of the site.
19. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance for the preliminary subdivision on April 8, 2004, therefore satisfying the
City's responsibility under the Act.
20. The William R. Fairchild International Airport is located south of the site. Port of Port
Angeles staff has been notified of the proposed subdivision proposal and per agreement with
the Port, it is expected that those who purchase properties in the final subdivision will be
aware of the existing on-going airport operation.
21. The Planning Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The
Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval. Reports
are advisory only to ensure conformance of the proposed subdivision to the general purposes
of the City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and specifications adopted by
the City.
22. Property owners within 300 feet of the proposed subdivision were mailed notice and the site
was posted for the proposal on March 5, 2004. Legal publication appeared in the Peninsula
Daily News on March 7, 2004. Two neighborhood written comments were received as a
result of the notification. Both comments spoke about site drainage, roadway development,
and access issues. Mr. and Mrs. Doug Ahmann expressed concern with regard to stormwater
drainage and roadway development. Mr. and Mrs. Bob Coons expressed concern about a
number of issues: roadway development, traffic, vision, and stormwater.
23. The City received a letter on May 24, 2004, from a neighbor who noted that he lives within
300' of the site and, although he knew by word of mouth of the application, he had not been
officially notified of the process. The applicant was notified who then withdrew his
application and resubmitted. A new public hearing was scheduled for June 23, 2004, 6 p.m.
and additional notification was sent and placed in the Peninsula Daily News on May 30,
2004. As a result of that new publication, Mr. McKee resubmitted his concerns as did Mr.
Coons.
147
Planning Commission Minutes
June 23, 2004
Page 8
Conclusions:
A. As conditioned, the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive
Plan and Land Use Map and Zoning Code.
B. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance,
Chapter 16.08 PAMC, and Chapter 58.17 RCW of the Washington State Subdivision Act
C. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and
general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public
ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure
safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school.
D. As conditioned, signage educating residents and visitors as to the prohibition of on-street
parking will ensure that interior streets remain passable for public safety situations where on-
street parking could prevent ease of passage for emergency vehicles and sight distance safety
issues.
E. The site has served as a drainage area over the years due to its topography and development
of the Milwaukee Railroad. Clearing and grading activities will require handling of the
existing drainage and future stormwater from the site as a result of development through the
subdivision process as no net increase in stormwater runoff will be allowed following
development of the site.
F. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting of this subdivision as articulated
in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision
provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the
State of Washington Growth Management Act.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Philpott and passed 5 - 0.
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -
SMA 04-04 - NIPPON PAPER, 1900 Block Marine Drive: Request to allow the
construction of a small office addition to an Industrial Heavy property located within the
shoreline.
Associate Planner Scott Johns presented the Department staff report supporting approval of the
proposed project. Commissioner Nutter asked if a parking study or other investigation of parking
had been done for the project. Planner Johns indicated that none had been done as the addition to
the office is small and would not be large enough to require additional parking spaces. In addition
Nippon Paper currently has a large parking area with adequate space available.
Dean Reed, P. O. Box 271, Port Angeles, WA, representative for Nippon Paper Company
stated that he was present and that he had read the staff report and had nothing to add or correct. He
148
Planning Commission Minutes
June 23, 2004
Page 9
stated that Nippon Paper had a large parking area with adequate parking and that the number of
employees had decreased by as many as 50 over the past several years. Construction drawings were
supplied to the Commissioners.
There being no further testimony, Vice Chair Rasmussen closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Philpott moved to approve SMA 04-04 with the following Conditions,
findings, and conclusions:
Conditions:
1. If the subject site has not been previously inventoried, evaluated, and reviewed to the
satisfaction of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the subject site shall be evaluated by a
cultural review team which shall include a professional archaeologist, a representative of the
Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the site owner, and the Port Angeles Department of Community
Development. This team shall determine the extent of excavation monitoring for the project
during the permit review process. As an alternative, the applicant may volunteer to have an
approved archaeologist on site during any excavation in lieu of a review by the
aforementioned cultural team. If during an excavation that by decision of the cultural review
team occurs without an approved archaeologist on-site, any phenomena of possible
archaeological interest are uncovered, the developer shall stop such work and provide for a
site inspection and evaluation by a professional archaeologist to ensure that all possible
valuable archaeological data is properly salvaged.
2. Applicant shall use all best management practices during construction to avoid negative
impacts to the shoreline and marine waters.
3. All permits required by other agencies shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain.
Conditions required by permits from other agencies shall be observed.
Findings:
1. An application for a shoreline permit was submitted by Nippon Paper Industries, on May 4,
2004, for the addition of a small office to an existing office building. The application
indicates that the work will occur within 200 feet of the shoreline. The site is 100% covered
by impervious surface.
2. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued by the City of Port Angeles SEPA
Responsible Official for the proposal on June 8, 2004.
3. The Port Angeles Shoreline Master Program, Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and
Critical Areas Ordinances have been reviewed with respect to this application.
4. The Port Angeles SMP Chapter 5 H. Environmental Designation matrices list non-water-
oriented industrial uses as conditionally allowed as an addition to an existing use in the UH
designation.
149
Planning Commission Minules
June 23, 2004
Page 10
5. The site is designated Industrial on the City's Comprehensive Plan, Industrial Heavy in the
City's Zoning Ordinance, and Urban-Harbor in the City's Shoreline Master Program.
6. The following adopted City policies are most relevant to the proposed project:
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Policies A-2, and the City's Shoreline Master
Program's Urban-Harbor designation and Chapter 4, Policies B.1, 2, and Regulation B.2;
Policy D.1, H-1 through 4, J-2, and N-2, Chapter 5, Policy D-1.
7. The City's waterfront trail follows Marine Drive through the Nippon Industries site and will
not be impacted by the project.
Conclusions:
.A. The proposed project as conditioned, is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and
Shoreline Master Program.
B. The project will not be detrimental to the shoreline or result in an increase in impervious
surface on the site.
C. As conditioned, the proposed project will not interfere with public use of lands or waters.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Norton and passed 5 - 0.
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - SMA 04-02 - CITY OF
PORT ANGELES, shoreline area at Port Angeles landfill site - West 18th Street. Request
to allow investigatory work to collect wind, wave, and current information for analysis
purposes.
Associate Planner Scott Johns presented the Department staff report recommending approval of
the Shoreline Permit.
Vice Chair Rasmussen opened the public hearing. Bill Webb, 5700 Kitsap Way, Suite 202,
B remerton, WA, representative of Parametrix, the consulting firm designing the project for the City
indicated that he is in attendance and had nothing to add to the staff report but is available for
questions. Commissioner Philpott asked staff if this permit would allow for any other work on the
shoreline, such as installation of a bulkhead. Planner Johns assured the Commission that the only
work being permitted at the current time was for the investigatory excavations as described in the
permit application and that any subsequent work would require a new application and SEPA
checklist.
There being no further testimony, Vice Chair Rasmussen closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Norton moved to approve SMA 04-02 with the following conditions,
findings, and conclusions:
150
Plannb,g Commission Minutes
dune 23, 2004
Page I 1
Conditions:
1. If the subject site has not been previously inventoried, evaluated, and reviewed to the
satisfaction of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the subject site shall be evaluated by a
cultural review team which shall include a professional archaeologist, a representative of the
Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the site owner, and the Port Angeles Department of Community
Development. This team shall determine the extent of excavation monitoring for the project
during the permit review process. As an alternative, the applicant may volunteer to have an
approved archaeologist on site during any excavation in lieu of a review by the
aforementioned cultural team. If during an excavation that by decision of the cultural review
team occurs without an approved archaeologist on-site, any phenomena of possible
archaeological interest are uncovered, the developer shall stop such work and provide for a
site inspection and evaluation by a professional archaeologist to ensure that all possible
valuable archaeological data is properly salvaged.
2. All permits required by State and Federal agencies shall be obtained be the applicant. Any
and all conditions of those permits shall be observed during the work.
3. Any vegetation damaged or removed in the Dry Creek ravine shall be replanted immediately
upon completion of the exploratory work.
4. Best Management Practices shall be used during all phases and in all areas of impact from
the project to control erosion and potential sedimentation of the creek and shoreline.
5. The developer shall immediately stop work and notify the City of Port Angeles if any
phenomena of possible archaeological interest are uncovered during excavations. In such
cases, the developer shall be required to provide for a site inspection and evaluation by a
professional archaeologist to ensure that all possible valuable archaeological data is properly
salvaged.
Findings:
1. An application for a shoreline permit was submitted by the City of Port Angeles Public
Works and Utilities Department on May 4, 2004 for exploratory work including boring test
holes, digging test pits, and anchoring in-water equipment to measure wave and tide action.
The application indicates that the work will occur within the shoreline area, below the
ordinary High Water Mark and above the Mean Higher High Tide at the base of the marine
bluff. The materials that are excavated will be appropriately stored and then returned to the
excavated pit during the same period of work, so that no pits remain open from day to day.
Revegetation of any disturbed area in the Dry Creek Ravine will also occur. Best
management practices will be incorporated to address potential erosion and water quality
impacts from the construction.
2. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued by the City of Port Angeles SEPA
Responsible Official for the proposal on June 15, 2004.
151
Planning Comm~sionMinutes
June 23, 2004
Page 12
3. The Port Angeles Shoreline Master Program, Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and
critical areas ordinances have been reviewed with respect to this application.
4. The site is designated Open Space in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Public Buildings and
Parks in the City's Zoning Ordinance, and Urban-Shoreline Protection and Aquatic
Conservancy in the City's Shoreline Master Program.
5. The following adopted City policies are most relevant to the proposed project:
Comprehensive Plan Growth Management Element, Policy 1 .j, Land Use Element Policy A-
2, and Open Space Goals J.1, Conservation Element Policies A.1, 2, 3, B.1,2, 6, and 9, D.1,
2, 3, 4, and 8.
6. The City's waterfront trail does not access the beach at any point along the length of the
project.
Conclusions:
A. As conditioned the proposed project, is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and
Shoreline Master Program.
B. As proposed and conditioned, the project will not be detrimental to the shoreline.
C. The proposed activity is temporary and will not be detrimental to the shoreline environment
D. As proposed, the project will not interfere with public use of lands or waters.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Philpott and passed 5 - 0.
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -
SMA 04-03 - CITY OF PORT ANGELES, Crown Park; Request to construct drainage
improvements and sanitary sewer line installation.
Planner Johns presented the Department staff report recommending approval of the project. Vice
Chair Rasmussen opened the public hearing.
Steve Sperr, P. O. Box 1150, Port Angeles, WA City of Port Angeles engineer, provided
background on the project. Upon a question from Commissioner Philpott, Mr. Sperr explained that
the pipe would consist of ductile iron pipe where they would be above ground from the top of the
slope to the bottom of the slope, white PVC pipe where they would be underground from 4th Street
through Crown Park, and the sewer line following the industrial water line would be HDPE pipe with
welded joints.
There being no further testimony, Vice Chair Rasmussen closed the public heating.
Commissioner Philpott moved to approve SMA 04-03 with the following conditions:
152
Planning Commission Minutes
dune 23. 2004
Page 13
Conditions:
1. The applicant is responsible for application and acquisition of all applicable local, state, and
federal permits. A stormwater discharge into a wetland will require a HPA issued by the
Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. All conditions of that permit shall be
observed.
2. All vegetation that is disturbed or destroyed during the construction of the project shall be
replanted or reestablished.
3. The applicant shall incorporate Best Management Practices to minimize erosion and
sedimentation during construction of the project.
4. If the subject site has not been previously inventoried, evaluated, and reviewed to the
satisfaction of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the subject site shall be evaluated by a
cultural review team which shall include a professional archaeologist, a representative of the
Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the site owner, and the Port Angeles Department of Community
Development. This team shall determine the extent of excavation monitoring for the project
during the permit review process. As an alternative, the applicant may volunteer to have an
approved archaeologist on site during any excavation in lieu of a review by the
aforementioned cultural team. If during an excavation that by decision of the cultural review
team occurs without an approved archaeologist on-site, any phenomena of possible
archaeological interest are uncovered, the developer shall stop such work and provide for a
site inspection and evaluation by a professional archaeologist to ensure that all possible
valuable archaeological data is properly salvaged.
Findings:
1. An application for a shoreline permit was submitted by the City of Port Angeles, Public
Works and Utilities Department, on February 24, 2004, for the installation of storm sewer
and sanitary sewer pipe lines from Crown Park to the base of the bluff and for the sanitary
sewer line to continue east along the existing industrial water line to sewer pump station 3
at the intersection of Marine Drive and Hill Street. The application indicates that the work
will occur within public right-of-ways, on public and private property. Best management
practices will be incorporated to address potential erosion and water quality impacts from the
construction. The project is necessary to eliminate a combined sewer overflow (CSO) and
to change the stormwater discharge point and outfall from the top of the bluff at Crown Park
to the base of the bluff to reduce erosion of the bluff.
2. A wetland delineation was required for the proposal, which was submitted in May, 2004 by
Westech Company.
3. Shoreline Master Program Chapter 6 Utilities Regulation 4 allows sewer lines, which are not
essentially water dependent, to be authorized by conditional use permit.
153
Planning Commission Minutes
dune 23, 2004
Page 14
4. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued by the City of Port Angeles SEPA
Responsible Official for the proposal on June 15, 2004.
5. The Port Angeles Shoreline Master Program, Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and
critical areas ordinances have been reviewed with respect to this application.
6. The site is designated Open Space and industrial in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Public
Buildings and Parks in the City's Zoning Ordinance, and Urban-Harbor in the City's Shoreline
Master Program.
7. Chapter 5 of the City's Shoreline Master Program indicates utilities are permitted uses in the
U-H designation, however, Chapter 6, I, Utilities Policy 2 and Regulation 4, specifies non-
water dependent utilities require a shoreline conditional use permit.
8. The following adopted City policies are most relevant to the proposed project:
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Policies A-2, and I-2 & 3, and Conservation Element
Policy A-2, B-12, 15, 19 D-6 & 10; the City's Shoreline Master Program's Urban-Harbor
designation and Chapter 4, Policies B-1 and 2, D-l, E-2, H, 1-4, J-2, M-1 and 2, and N-2,
Chapter 5, Policies D-1 and 5, and Chapter 6, Policies I-1, and all associated regulations.
9. The City's waterfront trail is located on the north side of Marine Drive and will not be
impacted by this project. Shoreline access will not be affected by this project.
10. The marine bluff is considered a landslide hazard area, as it meet the defined criteria of
having slopes over 15%, impermeable soils, and ground water seepage. No vegetation is
proposed for removal and no large equipment is proposed to work on the steep slopes. The
work occurring on the slope will be done by hand held tools. No cleating, grading or filling
will take place as part of the project. Any vegetation that is inadvertently destroyed will be
replanted at the conclusion of the pipe installation. There will be no increase in surface water
discharge on the steep slope, as the surface water currently directed over the bank shall be
located in the piping. The surface water will be treated in a swirl concentrator at the top of
the bluff prior to its discharge into the log pond. At the discharge point, the surface water
will enter a stilling well to dissipate energy prior to outfall through a channel lined with
quarry spalls.
Conclusions:
A. The proposed project as conditioned, is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and
Shoreline Master Program.
B. The project will not be detrimental to the shoreline.
C. No feasible alternatives were available.
D. As conditioned, the proposed project will enhance the shoreline environment.
Planning Commission Minutes
dune 23, 2004
Page 15
E. As conditioned, the proposal meets the criteria as a utility for a permitted use in the Urban
Harbor designation.
F. As conditioned, the proposed project will not interfere with public use of lands or waters.
G. The project is in compliance with 15.24 PAMC.
H. The project is in the public interest.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Honnold and passed 5 - 0.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None
STAFF REPORTS
Director Collins stated that the City Council had approved the Comprehensive Plan and followed
most of the Planning Commission recommendations.
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
Commissioner Philpott commended the Department of Community Development staff for their
hard work and overtime that has been invested in the last few months in completing the
Comprehensive Plan and keeping up with the current planning issues at the same time.
Vice Chair Rasmussen stated that he is unsure whether he will be present for the July 14, 2004,
meeting, as he is leaving town and will not return until July 13, 2004.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
Brad Collins, Secretary Len Rasmussen, Vice Chair
PREPARED BY: S. Johns/S. Roberds
155
156