HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 07/30/2002
r---...
r
FORTAN'GELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
321 EAST FIFTH STREET
Bed~y Upton
City Clerl~
July 30,2002
SPECIAL MEETING' - 6:00 p.m.
A. CALL TO ORDER - Special Meeting (6:00 p.m.)
ROLL CALL -
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -
B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION -
1. Mid-year Financial Report
" 1. Governmental Fund Projects
2. Award Contract for Revitalization of
Carnegie Library
1
31
Present Report
Approve List of Projects
Award Contract
35
i
C. ADJOURNMENT
G:\CNCLPK1\AGENDA\02-0730 Spec mtg,wpd
Public hearings..are. set'by.th.e9itYCo~ncil.'in..ordert()rneetJe~alrecf9Ir~m~9~. .
amendmentstoCity.landHseTe!JUlatiol1~,zoning9hang~s.}lnnexati()l1s; 111. a'ddIJ()n, ...eCit}t.(.:oUncilrTlayselapublic hearirigjnordEino.. receIve
public input prior to makingdecisionswhich impact the citizens. Certain rnatt~rs may be cOl1troversial; and the City Coul1cil may choose to seek public
opinion through the public hearing process;.' .
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES A V AILABLEFOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
July 30, 2002 Port Angeles City Council Meeting
Page - 1
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
I.
CALL TO ORDER - SPECIAL MEETING:
II. ROLL CALL:
Members Present:
Mayor Wiggins
Councilman Braun
Councilman Campbell
Councilmember Erickson
Councilman Headrick
Councilmember Rogers
Councilman Williams
Staff Present:
. Manager Quinn
~~ttomey Knutson
- ~. ~ - Clerk Upton
B. Collins
M. Connelly
G. Cutler
D. McKeen
T. Riepe
y. Ziomkowski
~ rl_ Other Staff Present:
-=z=- ~:~~j>~
v/
July 30~ 2002
~f "1(\-
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Led by: .3..i.ntl.AA.o <;;;);;, 0 ~ rD..At.-' ~..OOJ.dJl>..;..
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
· ~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Attendance Roster
DATE OF MEETING: July 30. 2002
LOCATION: City Council Chambers
jOA
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
July 30, 2002
To:
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
YVONNE ZIOMKOWSKI, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT:
Mm- YEAR BUDGET STATUS REpORT
This is the budget status report for the six-month period ended June 30, 2002. These reports show
the City's financial position at midyear as compared to the budget and the same period in the prior
year. The reports are divided by funds and show revenues by sources and expenditures by department
and object.
The percent of revenue to collect columns reflect uncollected revenues as compared to budget.
Funding available columns show the percentage left to spend in the 2002 budget. The benchmark,
for analytical purposes, should be 50% assuming all financial transactions occur at the same level
each month. Higher percentages might indicate seasonal spending and possible savings. Lower
percentages may mean potential spending over budgeted appropriations.
Following the narratives are tables and schedules showing details of all revenues and expenditures
by fund, department, and object. These reports are mostly for informational purposes. A presentation
will be made at the July 30, 2002 Special Council meeting, showing where we are according to the
budget. At this time, staff will indicate possible budget savings or overruns and estimates for the
City's financial condition for year-end. Since utilities operate on an entirely or a predominately self-
supported basis, the major attention will be given to governmental funds.
General Fund Summary
As of June 30, the General Fund is on "General Fund Revenue
target with 49.5% of revenues collected
and 45.5% of appropriations expended
Revenues
General Fund Revenue by major
revenue source is depicted in the
following table. Since more than 60%
of the General Fund revenue is in the
tax category we evaluate this revenue
very carefully. Over 50% of tax
revenue, which includes property taxes,
sales and use taxes, utility taxes, and a
YTD
June
2002
Budget
2002
% of
Budget
to Collect
Taxes
Licenses & Perm Its
Intergovernmental
Charges for Services
Fines & Forfeitures
Miscellaneous
Transfers - in
Total
3,977,133
92,255
271,161
1,642,863
113,374
145,056
127,102
7,899,226
256,525
441,624
3,519,805
243,000
267,573
254,200
6,368,944 12,881,953
49.65
64.04
38.60
53.33
53.34
45.79
50.00
50.56
1
small percentage of other taxes such as gambling and leasehold, has been colleCted as of June 30. .'
This collection is at a slightly lower, level as sonipared to prior y~ars .at this time.
The 53% collection of property taxes, the largest single source of revenue, is 2.3% above last year's
level. This increase was included in the budget and represents a 1 % overall incr~ase in the levy and
new construction. Colle~tion of rn,6re than 5.0% doesn't iridicate that we will collect more than
budgeted. Usually collection in the frrsthalf of the year is higher than in.the second half. In the..
future, as a result of recent initiatives, increases in the property tax levy are limited to only 1 %.
Utility tax collection, the second: largest
source of re~enue ip. .the GeneraJ. Food, is
8.7% higher than 2001 levels. This is the
only revenue source that has increased in
. .. . .
the past years. Unfortunately, this is only
the result of increases .,in. water and
electric utility. In the past ten years, the
number of utility accounts has not grown;
which indicates a. static population. At
this time, a 51.3% collection of utility
taxes may indicate higher than budgeted
revenue. However, the two-week closure
of Daishowa paper mill in July and
3I!-other one,possible l,ater in the year, may result in lower than budgeted revenue. . Electric services
provide 63% of all utility taX revenue and any change in the power purchase m~ket irifluences this
revenue. Since utility taxes apply to all utilities providing services in the City, the formation of storm
water management may.bring additional revenue to the General Fund. This item is not a large
revenue source since our goal is to minimize charges to the property owners for storm water control. '
. .
. . . . '.
. ". .".".
S~les Tax, which was formerly the largest revenue source, accounts for 17% of total revenues. Tlie
~xable base includes all retail sales of personal property to state residents and$ome professional
services. Sales tax is on
target with almost 50% of
revenue collected and is
2% higher than last year
at the same time. Since'
collections are us~ally
greater the second half of
the year (due to a tourism
season) it is possible that
we are going to collect
more revenue than
budgeted. However, most
of the increase was
attributed to some unique
events that occurred
III
"C
C
C'CI
III
::::l
o
J:
I-
2,450
2,400
2,350 .'
2,300
2;250
2,200
2,150
2,100
2~050
2;000 ..~,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~. ~}~ ~ ~ ~ ~
..'" ..'" ..'" ..'" .... ..'" ..'" ..'Ii ..'" ..'" "''11..._ 0. v'" v~ v'"
"'~<:> (o~ (~- (0\- (o't
f'I,~ ~~, ~~ ~ ~ .
"'~~ "'~~ "'~~ "'~<:>
_Electric Utility _Water _Westewater ........;..So/ld Weste
Sales Tax Revenue
R~
.
""'..
I'
Ill'
III I!II.
II
~rI Ill!
~
..
...... ft" ....
II l1li
~.. "l'),; '"','
1II1i1111ll!lt'll
. -~
..I!.a iIiI
11(";". II!. III 1ft,. ~
.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~qj ~~ ~q ~q ~Oj ~~ ~qj ~q. ~Oj ~~ ~tS e~ rl' ~~. ~~ ~~
" " " " " " " " " " ~~,.. RO .ev .ev .ev
",tS <l(,O. <l(,O~ ~(,O~ <l(O~
~"'. ~~ ~~ ~~
",tS ",tS ~ ",tS
2
during the Winter and higher activities in construction. We also have to take intO consideration that'
this collection is still 4.2% Jess than in 2000 anhesame,time. We,don't like to hear nor say the "r",
. . . - .. ," '" .",..',
word, .but it is clear that the economic situation has not improved and it is becoming increasingly
important to enhance our efforts toward economic development.
Telephone taxes, levied at 5.5%, are below expectations. In past years, this revenue source was
growmg rapidly due to the increasing popul~ty of cellular phones. This year, receipts are coming "
in at below budgeted levels. If this trend continues, we may collect $50,000 less tax than originally
budgeted. It' is possible that the increased 'popularity of e-mail, prepaid phone cards, and fixed long
di~tance rate programs have limited growth'of this revenue.
There is almost no growth in other revenue sources. Collection of leasehold and gambling taxes
is below 2001 and 2000 levels. Intergovernmental revenues, which are mostly state shared
- .. . . . . . . . .,
revenues, grants, and local agenCies participating in 'our programs"are 4% less than in 2001 and 11 %"
less than in 2000. Additionally; in 2003 we are going tol08e$124,565 in state assistance programs
. ," . .". ., . .....' ". .'.
and there is a possibility oflosing some criminal justice funding. Our goal is to aggressively seek
new grants and partnerships with other agencies. Other'budgeted intergovernmental 'revenue, such.
as liquor board profits and liquor excise tax are on target and all budgeted amounts/should be
collected. " , , ,
Fines and forfeitures ,are at 47%. This is below the budget, but since this represents only five
months of collections, we should be able to collect at the budgetary level.
This year there is no problem with the c~llection of licenses and permits. Building permits are at .
63% collected and are 29% higher than last year's level. Higher than expected activity in
construction also increased sales tax collections.
Interest revenue is very disappointing.
-' - ," .
Eleven rate cuts in 200112002 resulted in
the lowest interest rates in 40 years. The'
,Fed rate is 1.75%. The Local Investment
''State Pool, usually the best for short
term investments, ,has been" yielding "
1.75% to 1.85%. Two-year bonds are at
2.2%. To earn more than 3% in interest, ,
we would have to extend maturities to
, ,
more than 2.5 years. With the negative
fluctuations in the stock market there is
very little possibility of increasing rates
in 2002. This revenue is 29% below the "
2001 level, but I hope to .collect at, the
budgeted level.
4OO,(XX)
350,(XX)
~,(XX)
250, (XX)
2OO,(XX)
150,(XX)
100, (XX)
50, (XX)
o
"'C::> ","- "''\. "'~ ",b< "'~ ",q, ",,\ ",'0 "'~ "C::> ~ ' i ; ;
q)'J q)'J q)'J q)'J q)'J' q)'J q)'J q)'J q)'J q)'J ~", 0~ ~ ",e ,!<$J ~0 !<$J
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c~ ~ ~ ~ "- ~.~.~.~
, rf'C::> 9.,,0 9.,,0'<;9.,0'<;9.,,0'<; ,
S)'\. S)~ ~ S)~ ,
'\.~ rps rps rps "
Overall, it is very difficultto estimate what, ifany, the City may have as revenue surplus. Based on
3'
prior experience, I think we may collect approximately $50,000 more than budgeted. However, there
are still unknown factors which may influence revenue collection in the second part of this year and
I have to be careful in my projections.
General Fund Expenditures
Expenditures
YTD
June
2002
Budget
2002
% of
Budget
to Spend
General Fund expenditures are right on
target with more than 54% of budget left
to spend. The tables in the attachment
show General Fund expenditures by
department and by object and the table
below shows expenditures at the
summary level. Although the 50%
benchmark determines whether Total
departments are staying within their
budget, there is occasionally a one -time
(e.g., capital) or seasonal (parks, street) expense that may alter the analysis. To estimate the year~end
position based on current levels of spending would be a mistake since capital purchases,. transfers,
and seasonal labor usually occur in the summer.
Personnel cost
Supplies
Charges for Services
Intergovernmental
Capital Outlay
Transfers. out
4,397,246
204,397
900,464
452,339
14,324
27,502
9,140,483
416,059
1,926,140
996,687
101,062
300,860
51.89
50.87
53.25
54.62
85.83
90.86
5,996,272 12,881,291
53.45
Operating expenditures, which include personnel, supplies, and charges for services, are at 52%
unexpended and reflect a reduction in overall expense as compared to the 2001 level. While the
percentage of reduction is small, the reality is that the fund operations have to absorb the mandated
expense of increased jail costs, intergovernmental fees, inflation, accelerating medical costs, and
labor agreement impacts. In the past five years, we have been keeping a tight rein on our expenses.
It is increasingly difficult to provide quality services with no budget increases. Personnel costs
represent more than 70% of our budget. Even with a 20% increase in medical costs and a 3.15% cost
of living increase, we are still below last year's levels. This is attributed to reducing personnel
through attrition, postponing the hiring process, and lower rates in the state retirement program.
As always, we are concerned over the growing cost of the county jail. In the past three years this
expenditure has increased at a high rate These charges include the incarceration program as well as
medical care for the prisoners. If jail expenses for the remainder of the year are at the same level
as year-to-date, we will be over budget.
At this time I don't estimate going over the total General Fund budget, but I am cautious about
promising any savings.
Reserves
Reserves or "unreserved fund balances" provide a measure of the financial resources available for
future use or appropriation. How do we determine what is the "right amount" of reserves? Generally,
fund balance should be maintained at a level that provides adequate cushions in the event of
economic recession or unanticipated revenue shortfalls. Further, it should insure desired cash flow
levels to avoid unnecessary short-term borrowing. On the other hand, keeping excessive fund
4
balances, especially when there isa 'I.
great need' for capital improvements,
may ~eflect poor management and.1apk
OfpbliCies. .
..
145
c:: "4
" ~ 3
In th~years 199i-1998,fUnd bal~ces i 2
in the General. Fund consistently 1-
improved .as a result of a very 0
controlled approach to both revenue ,....1), ,....~
~d spending. Durjng these years, ..
funds were not designated for street 11II
.
projects or. equipinent replacement.. II!l .. m II
The City' s ~eeds, especially in the area ,. .
of street improvements and capital proje,ds, have been"growirlg rapidly. To fulfill these needs staff,.
wi~ the City Gouncil's ~ppioval"decrease9 thefun~ baI~ce by ~nw~t $2.5 Itlillion. (~hich. .
represented almost 58% of the reserves) and designated those funds toward the capital improvement
program, buying .back part of equipment replacement~ and'designating $350,000 for the special.'
contingency fund.
..
"IiI
.
........
General FunCl
[Unreserved Fund Balances
.
Ii
.
11II
.
11II
I
.
~~
~
~~
~
'. .
~
.
.
~
'i'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~
,..~ ,..~ ,..~ ,..~ ,... ,..~ I),~ f\. ~...
'~~'Il
'" ~ I),
I),~
.
III
. .
Our Financial Management policy sets the minimum level of fund balance.at 10% of the General,
Fund budget. At this.time, we maintain an almost $2 million balance, which is close to 15% of the
budget. Presently, we are committing any budgetary "sufpius" to capital i1eeds~ In 2001 we were
able to save, $500,000 arid together With tpe Counc~l we must deCide h~w to destgn:ate those funds. .
The current fund balance levei is adequate in the Gener8I .FUnd, however, it is very unPbrtant that
we contiIiueto walk the conservative road because ofthe overall economic outlook and not allow
hits on the. reserves. (This issue will be further discussed in the folloWing memo regardingfimding
capital projects) " ,
Outlook for the Future
Every. year the Finance
Department updates the City's'
five-year forecast. We assume
the task of projecting revenues
and expenses, calculate
estimates of growth and impact
_~ased on expliCit assumption
and policies, and factor in
special circumstances that
influence the cost of providing
servicys. TIu.-ough this strategic
exercise, we hope to forecast
financial trends which will
enable us to plan for necessary
adjustments. The proactive
,16,000,000
14;000,000
12,090,000
10,000,00
8,000,000
o
-2,000,000
1999 ".~~~~I e:::t~o~~o~$;~~~o~$;o~~o~S;o~~~~$~o~~o~$;or~ca$t
_Revenues' .Expenses qReserves I
5-
approach to the City's - Forecast
finances IS becoming a Bu~get
priority. As the graph and 2002
table display only.' with Revenues 12,B81,954
. ' . Operating Exp. 12,499,196
keepmg thestatus quo an4 Capital Exp.lCIP 382,757
not dping any Illajor capital Revenue less Exp. 0
projects, the fund balance Ending Fund Balance" 2,440,620
in General. Fund would be
. .
depleted in year 2005; We "Endlng'Fund Balairce for 2002 includes $500,000 "surplus" from 2001 budget.
must be more diligent. in .
seeking. operating Assumptions:
f~. .. d 1- k i: "COLA 2.5% In 2003,2.7% after
e IIClenClesan 00 lOr." .. d'" I I' 12"'. 20.' 03 5% ft.
/lie lea ,nsurance /. In ,. a er
".Llabillty Insurance 5%,ln 2003, 3.~% after
" no increase in number of personnel
new revenue sources.
Street Fund
Projected Forecast
2003 2004 2005 2006
12,836,496 12,997,901 13,162,712 13,301,033 '
12,958,353 13,396,757 13,B53,681 14,330,152
250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
(371,B57) (64B,B56) (940,969) (1,279,119)
2,068,f63 1;419,907 .' 41B;938, (BOO,1B1)-
Revenues in this fund are derived primary from property taxes (37%) and gas tax,es (35%). hi
addition, 25% of this fund is supported . . .
by internal.transfers from Solid Waste,
Real Estate Excise Tax, and General Gas Tax Revenue Summary
Fund.
Although only 45% of gas taxes were
collected year-to-date, this revenue is
cyclical, with higher receipts in the
second half of the year. However I am
concerned, as these receipts are 8%
lower than last year and 11 % less than in
2000 at this time. From 1991~ gas tax.
revenue has been declining from $24.54
to $2L32 per capita (ove.f 13%). At the
same time, the need for street .'
maintenance and trap-sportation
infrastructure increased significantly.
30
~
~ 20
u
..
"
Q.
tII-
10
~" ~'" ~"J ~... ~~ ~fO ~~
"q "q "q "q "q "q "q
. '"
~ffJ ~Oj ~t:; ~" ~e
"q "q "'~ "'~ ~~
~-
~'"
"'~
. .
The spending level in the street fund is al~o seasonal in namre. Street maintenance and construction
activities accelerate during the summer months. We have just started a street paving project for a
total.cost of $250,000.lnthe 2002 budget, we had included $80,000 for street lighting. However,
several cities challenged this mandate and after a court ruling against the cities' position~ 'the State'
legislature passed a law allowing us to return the expense for street lighting to the Electric Utility
Fund. This action allows us to save the $80,000 and designate the funds toward another project, such
as the Carnegie Library.
As a result of a more aggressive pavement and chip sealing program, the Street fund balance
6
decreased in the last foUr years.'
Weare con~eined about funding'
sources for street and bridge
projects in, the future. We have'
been, supporting the Street Fund,
~ith transfers from' the General
, . .
Fund, and by using Real Estate,
Excise Tax funds to pay for debt
service on the 8th Sfre~t
reconstruction and Marine Drive.
We also have been identifying
major projects in' the Capital
I Facility Plan (CFP) to secure some
fu.llding. We are very aggressive in seeking state and federal grants. During the years 2000-2002, the'
City recdved more tha!J. $5 million in grants and low interest" loans for streetprojects. Major projects
funded by grants are 8th Street Reconstruction and the Airport Road Realignment.
Street Reserves
T
h '6.00
o
u
5400
a
n
d
200
5
o
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Gove~mental Capital Improvement Projects
In. May and June, the City staff and CounciL evaluated a list of projects andidentified funding
sources. The folloWing list includes projects which are already under construction or. have been
authorlzedby the Council and therefore, the funds have 'already been comniitted.The toullamowlt
for these projects is $1,233,000.
.$80~000 Waterfront Trail- Rayonier Mill site
. $25,000 visibility study for the pool renovation
· $568,000 Fire Station roof repair
· $150,000 Olympic Discov~ry Trail,:, RaY9nier to'Morse Creek ($36,000.,in 2003,and
$114,000 in 2004)
· $10,000 to finalize Francis Street Park
· '$50,000 Lauridsen Blvd.! Airport Road realignment ($75,000 less th~ previously estimated)
· '$90,000 to finalize 8th Street restoration ($25,000 more than previously estiinated)
· , $185,000 Laurel Street slide repair (2002)
. $50,000 Ediz Hook rip rap repair (2002)
· "$25,00.0. City east entrance trees (20.02)
. .
In addition, the revised list of 2002/2003 projects totaling $742,000 includes:
· $25,000 City east entrance trees (2003)
· $50;000 sidewalk program ($25,000 in 2002 and $25,000 in 2'003)
· $110,000 Carnegi~ Library (2002)
· $20,000. ADA Curb Ramps/Chargers (2002)
· $182,000 Pool renovation (2003)
· $280,000 8th Street bridge replacement design, matching funds (2003)
· $25,000 City Pier dredging and pilling replacement (2003)
· $50,000' Laurel Street pavers - Railroad to 1st 'Street (2003)
7
The funding sources for capital projects are limited to $1,475,000 of existing funds and possible
allocation of $500,660 from 2001 budgetary "surpluses." Staff also needs Council's direction on how
to proceed with the Carnegie Library project. This project was developed with resources including
$800,000 of funds already accunlulated, $110,000 identified in the CIP allocation, and a promise
from the Walkl~g Trust, for $20q,000. However, based on ~ecent an4 current ,stock market
performance, the initial paYment from the W3Ik1ing Trustwill !ikelydecrease to' $1.00,000 orless.
It is possible that the City may have to designate an additi()l).al $100,000 to $150,000 for the
completion of this project until-~e remaiI~.der of the Walkling Trust f\mds are rec~ived. We propose
to use $80,000 from Street Lighting and '
$20,000 for this ye~'s highe,r revenue
collections.
Other Funds
HotellMotel Tax
Lodging taxes are the sole source of
revenue for this fund. This is a 4% tax on
the cost of renting a room in a hotel or
motel within the City. The first 2% is
derived by taking 2% ofthe ~tate's 6.5.%
sales tax and rebating it back to the
community for local programs to promote
tourism. The additional 2%, which was
authorized in 1998, is to be used solely for
tourism marketing and promotion.
Hotel Motel Tax
T
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
o
2002
budget
Historically, the. City receives the majority of all hotel/motel tax revenue (72-75%},in the last six
moths of the year (see Schedule B). So, even at 70% of revenue .left to collect,;this fund is ahead of
target. To date, this year's collections exceeded last year's by13%. If this trend continues, we may
collect $10,000 to $20,000 more than budget~d..Beautiful weather and special events are positive
factors. New pr~grams ~d marketing efforts have an effect as well. The positive ~~8nge occurred
as a result of the Tourism.Marketing Campaign being reoriented to ,the . Chamber of Commerce
without direct control by the Visitor & Convention Bureau.
This is the second year $100,000 was designat~d for acquisition and construction of a new
convention center. The same amount will be reserved for the remainder of20 years.
Electric Utility Fund
Operating revenues are below budget with 56.6% left to collect. This is a result o(the consumer
electricity reduction agreement with BP A, which gives customers credit for consuming 10% less
than at the same time last year. This program has been very successful and in the first five months
our customers saved $400,000. We estimate that similar saving will be re~lized for ~e remainder
of the 12-month program. On the expense side, there is a direct correlatioI}. between pOwer sales and
power purchase. For this reason, power purchase is also below budget with 60% left to spend. We
8
are projectirig that both power sales
and po:wer purchase will need to be
adjusted down, especially since
Daishowa closed its operation'for
two wyeks. in July and there is a ,
possibility of another closure later ~
this year. ~
:E
Capital budget, which inCludes a
fiber. optic~ project and several
reconductoring and conversion
projects, is 93% unexpended.
Some of these projects start during
su'mmer nionths and should' be
completed by latter year end.i002
and into 2003. The fiber optic pilot project has been cancelled, and the funds from this project will
be used for the I-Net (Institutional Network) project. .
Cash Balances - Utilities
12
10
8
6'
4
2
,0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
YTD
'2002
. , . . . .
, - Electric - .WaterlWastewater -'Solid Waste
. .
Utilities have a more flexible budget than governlnt(ntal funds and are, analyzec1to insUre that
revenues are adequate to pay expenses . and fund smaller capital projects. The electric utility is still
stable with $5.5 million of unreserved cash balance, over $0.5 million reserved for debt ~ervice an~.
contingency, and $1.7 million in the rate stabilization fund. The'cash balances are lower thanlast
ye,ar, but this was anticipated in the budget.
Water'and Wastewater Fund
There is a seasonal impact on water sales
which is reflected .in the year-to-date
revenue being 3.6% below budget.
Wastewaterrevenue is on target with 49%
left to collect. Both of the utility
collections are higher than last year as a
result of a rate increase in January 2002. .
Operating expenSes are below budget with
55,% left to spend. Constructio.n project~,
which include Peabody Heights reservoir
cover ($550,000), pump., station 1 & 3
construction ($500,000), pipe replacement
($450,000),' and several smaller projects,
should be completed later this year.
Water & Wastewater Historical Rate Comparison
$40 ..
.
$35 ""... ·
" l1li
$30.
$25
$2 o' ......
~ ...
$15
$10
$5
$0 ~.", m l1li111"'" 1'1 ..
4, gg'l 4, gg" 4, gg~ 4, gg~ 4, gg1 4, 99'6 4, g"99 ?,OOO ?,~o4, ?,OO?'
..
..-
"'11", .'
.. "If
a IE
III
.
..
. u:i ..
m
'!!'
. .
-, . ~
.....
iii !llI;:,e:
~.
'11'..
~ ,
vfiJI
,.
,oI! '
r~ ",.
II ~~, '. .'" u,:
.,. II.. .. n
III '~'\II -III .
.. M ~ ,"
~, .. .r
l1li ~ .~ ...1....." . f
-+- Water
_ Wa~tewater .1'
We implemented a three-year rate mcrease
program starting January 2000 to fund severa.l major water. and wastewater project~ and to make
additional debt payments. The cash balance in this fund is still a healthy $6 million arid includes $2
; . . '. . . . ,
million for rate stabilization. However, with the completion of capital,projects, I estimate the cash,
9'
reserves to decrease by approximately $2 million to $3 million by year-end depending on receipt of
a $1 million PWTF loan.
Solid Waste Fund
Operating revenues in this fund consist of residential, commercial, and landfill sales. Revenues are
on target with almost 49% left to collect. Operating expenses are also on target. Major projects
include the 90-gallon conversion and long-term planning to develop basic concepts for the best
alternative for refuse disposal. following the 2006 landfill closure.
After retiring the debt in this fund..in 1997, the cash balances have been consistently increasing.
However, a major portion of cash reserves is designated for landfill closure and post-closure
expenses (almost $4.8 million or 61 % in 2002). The rest of reserves, estimated at approximately $3
million, will be designated for the development of future collection solutions, such as a transit
station.
Internal Services Funds
This group includes Equipment Services, Information Technology, and the Self-Insurance fund. All
these funds operate on the basis of reimbursement for their services.
Equipment Services accounts for the motor pool operations of the City including fleet rental and
replacement. As of June 30, expenses in this fund were in compliance with the budget. All $4
million in cash reserves is designated for equipment replacement. Since implementing changes in
replacement allocation in year 2000, we have returned a positive cash flow arid increased the cash
reserves. As the preliminary analysis of the replacement program has shown, this fund has adequate
reserves to cover replacement of small equipment and vehicles. However the replacement reserves
do not include future cost increases for equipment. Additionally, our challenge is to cover the gap
in unfunded equipment costs from the General Fund operation and to replace large or specialized
equipment such as the fire pumper or construction equipment.
Information Technology expenses include hardware and sofuyare purchases, maintenance, labor,
and supplies related to network, PC, and mainframe support. We are in the process of implementing
a new financial computer system. Some of the modules, such as general ledger, payroll, accounts
" .,
payable, and utility billing, will be operational in January 2003. Additionally, IT staffis working
on other projects, e.g., I-Net, oracle, imaging.
( As of June 30 expenses were on target. However, due to unforseen circumstances in personnel
changes and because most of the implementation and conversion work will occur later this year, we
may exceed the budget.
10
At midyear, the Selflnsurance Fund expenses were higher than budgeted and 27.6% more than last
year. Weare in the process of evaluating the high level of self-insurance expenses, but with less than
40% of the budget left to spend, a high level of workers compensation claims, and an increase in
Teamsters medical coverage costs in September, I am convinced we will need budget amendments.
I am concerned about decreasing cash reserves in this fund. As of June 30, cash balances were
$356,000, much below the recommended minimum of one-half million dollars.
As usual, I will be available at the meeting to answer your questions and concerns.
11
%of
YTD %Of Budget
June Change to Collectl
2001 Spend
Revenues:
Taxes 3,827,627 3.91 49.65
Licenses & Permits 71,308 29.38 64.04
Intergovernmental Revenues 282,364 (3.97 38.60
Charges for Services 1,946,604 (15.60 53.33
Fines & Forfeitures 159,927 (29.11 53.34
Interest on Investments 132,140 (28.86 41.77
Miscellaneous Revenue~ 105,763 (51.73 51.90
Other Financial Sources (ROI) 29,602 (0.01 50.00
Transfers -in 104,992 (7.13 50.00
Total Revenues 6,660,327 50.56
Operating Expenditures by Object:
* Personnel Benefits 4,410,419 (0.30 51.89
* Supplies & Charges for Services 1,199,789 (7.91 52.83
* Intergovernmental 31,830 (420.69 193.06
* Contribution to Pencom 221,789 (5.84 50.00
* Contribution to County Jail 121,225 69.00 56.41
* Capital Outlay 54,055 (73.50 85.83
* Transfers to Other Funds 317,502 (91.34 90.86
Total Expenditures 6,356,609 54.54
Excess Revenue over Expenditures 303,718
Beginning Fund Balance
Ending Fund Balance
Table I
General Fund
Summary of Financial Activities
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2002,
11
Table II
General Fund
Summary of Rev,enues
For the Second Quarter Ended Ended June 30, 2002
% of
YTD %Of Revenue
REVENUE SOURCE June Change to
2001 Collect
TAXES
Property Taxes 1,457,696 47.17
Sales Taxes 1,059,191 50.45
Utility Taxes - City Utilities 1,069,194 48.74
Utility Taxes - Non-City Utilities 810 (17.00
Leasehold Taxes 49,727 41.62
Gambling Taxes 63,583 42.71
Occupational Taxes 127,426 68.93
TOTAL TAXES 3,827,627 49.65
INTER GOVERNMENT AL
Motor Vehicle/Mobile Home Excise Taxes N/
State Assistance 121,213
Liquor Excise Tax 32,518 46.43
Liquor Board Profits 53.104 52.79
Border Patrol Impact Fees 1,638 11.80
Criminal Justice Entitlement 10,267 71.27
Other Intergovernmental 63,624 55.31
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 282,364 38.60
Licenses & Permits 71,308 64.04
Charges for Services 219,052 20.63
Medic-1 Revenues 208,401 45.59
Fines & Forfeitures 159,927 53.34
Interest on Investments 132,140 41.77
Interfund Charges 1,519,151 60.11
Return on Investments (ROI) 29,602 50.00
Transfers-in 104,992 50.00
Miscellaneous Revenues 105,763 51.90
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES 6,660,327 50.56
13
Schedule A
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
SALES TAX COLLECTION
FOR"THE YEARS 1997 - 2002
%OF %OF Yo OF BUDGETE
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 CHANGE CUM. CHANGE AMOUNT
2002 TO 2001 2002 TO 2001 COLLECTED
JANUARY 182,705 155,868 171,053 173,158 177,103 173,752 -7.18% (7.18 7.40%
FEBRUARY 203,257 189,874 209,075 229,281 229,841 197,447 13.03% 3.57 10.24%
MARCH 213,429 183,425 212,048 168,839 163,755 184,918 -11.60% (1.48 7.50%
APRIL 158,872 133,492 170,548 146,266 168,512 140,727 9.79% 0.80 7.09%
MAY 171,548 166,101 194,575 187,102 185,468 199,467 5.74% 1.90 9.67%
JUNE 193,869 164,244 193,174 183,587 201,726 162,880 2.46% 1.98 7.66%
JULY 175,785 177,591 157,255 182,078 177,198 181,113 0.82% 1.81 8.38%
AUGUST 181,297 182,129 198,912 " 195,383 209,714 210,704
SEPTEMBER 212,314 214,701 204,416 212,895 184,286 212,750
OCTOBER 203,549 225,998 207,406 210,347 201,891 204,366
NOVEMBER 207,704 199,053 214,952 201,801 233,789 221,319
DECEMBER 179,551 194,605 200,161 191 ,383 175,439 188,913
TOTAL 2,283 881 2187081 2 333 575 2282120 2 308,722 -44.57% 44.57 57.93%
BUDGET 2001
~
,1::0.
Table III
General Fund
Summary of Expenditures
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
YTD
June
EXPENDITURE BY OBJECT:
* Personnel Benefits
* Supplies
* Charges & SerVices
* Intergovernmental
* Contribution to Pencom
* Contribution to County Jail
* Capital Outlay
* Transfers out
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
~4,41 0,419
246,708
953,081
31,830
221,789
121,225
54,055
317,502
6,356 609
EXPENDITURE BY DEPARTMENT:
* City Council
* City Manager
* City Attorney
* Finance
* Planning
* Fire
* Police
* Parks & Recreation
* Public Works
* Facility Maintenance
* Transfers to CIP Fund
* Health & Community Services
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
28,911
262,452
209,381
698,396
159,843
1,048,895
1,614.241
1,065,752
1,100,483
123,724
44,531
6,356,609
2001
%of
Budget
to
Spend
51.89
50.87
53.25
193.06
50.00
56.41
85.83
90.86
54.54
51.26
52.35
55.84
55.64
53.17
51.80
54.25
51.29
55.57
61.13
100.00
48.17
54.54
15
Table IV
General Fund
Summary of Expenditures by Departments
For the Seco'nd Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
YTD
June
2001
%of
Budget
to
Spend
EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT AND OBJECT
City Council
* Personnel Benefits
* Supplies
* Charges & Services
Total City Council
City Attorney
* Personnel Benefits
* Supplies
* Charges & Services
* Intergovernmental
* Capital Outlay
Total City Attorney
18,746 50.00
1,937 72.24
8,228 48.02
28,911 51.26
201,928 51.50
6,098 42.08 .
41,924 58.65
N/
12,502 49.99
262,452 52.35
149,231
4,228
28,778
27,144
209,381
City Manager I Human Resources/City Clerk
* Personnel Benefits
* Supplies '\
* Charges & Services
* Capital Outlay
* Transfers out
Total City Manager
Community Development
* Personnel.Benefits
* Supplies
* Charges & Services
* Capital Outlay
* Intergovernmental
Total Planning
44,531
44,531
48.17
48.17
Finance
* Personnel Benefits
* Supplies
* Charges & Services
* Transfers out
Total Finance
Health & Community Services
* Charges & Services
Total Health & Community Services
16
%of
YTO Budget
June to
2001 Spend
Fire
* Personnel Benefits 881,735 51.16
* Supplies 32,734 60.27
* Charges & Services 96,705 56.27
* Capital Outlay Nt
* Contribution to Pencom 37,721 50.00
Total Fire 1,048,895 51.80
Police
* Personnel Benefits 1,155,638 48.82
* Supplies 26,641 43.18
* Charges & Services 121,983 49.36
* Intergovernmental 4,686 2,995.14
* Contribution to Pencom 184,068 50.00
* Contribution to County Jail 121,225 56.41
* Capital Outlay 100.00
Total Police 1,614,241 54.25
Parks & Recreation
* Personnel Benefits 728,137 51.03
* Supplies 122,144 40.91
* Charges & Services 190,480 54.13
* Transfer to Fine Art Center & Recreational Activities 40.00
* Capital Outlay 24,991 95.25
Total Parks & Recreation 1 065,752 51.29
Public Works
* Personnel Benefits 594,450 58.12
* Supplies 29,375 52.01
* Charges & Services 155,206 21.04
* Capital Outlay 16,452 62.56
* Transfers out 305,000 100.00
Total Public Works 1,100483 63.54
Facility Maintenance
* Personnel Benefits 26,040
* Supplies 4,763
* Charges & Services 80,309
* Capital Outlay 12,612
Total Facility Maintenance 123,724
17
STREET FUND
SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
YTD
June
2001
REVENUES
Taxes (Property)
Intergovemmental (Gas Taxes)
Charges for Services
Interest on Investments
Grants
Other
Transfer from REET #1
Transfer from General Fund
Transfer from Solid Waste
Transfer from Stormwater Utility
TOTAL REVENUES
231,003
199,337
1,620
2,766
11,079
50,002
495,807
EXPENDITURES
Personnel
Supplies
Charges & Services
Capital Outlay & Projects
Transfer to CIP Fund
Transfer to Equipment Services
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
255,168
59,527
113,82'1
428,516
NET INCREASE/DECREASE,
IN FUND BALANCE
67,291
FUND BALANCE
%OF
Change
% of Budget )
to Spend
or
Collect
100.00
64.11
53.62
64.00
62.62
N/
N/
100.00
68.95
(8,038.30
100.00
18
Lodging Tax Fund
SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
YTD
June
2001
REVENUES
Taxes - First 2%
Taxes - Second 2%
Interest on Investments
TOTAL REVENUES
49,822
49,824
3,195
102,841
EXPENDITURES
Charges for Services
Marketing Program
Allocation to Agencies
City of Port Angeles - Recreation Program
Debt Service
Convention Center Designation
600
100,861
75,000
14,000
22,440
) 100,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
312,901
NET INCREASE/DECREASE
IN FUND BALANCE
(210,06D
FUND BALANCE
%OF
Change
% of Budget
to Spend
or
Collect
70.73
70.63
25.20
70.21
50.00
41.20
69.91
50.00
41.14
19
Schedule 8
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX COLLECTION
FOR THE YEARS 1"997 - 2002
Both Levies (40/0)
% OF % OF Yo OF BUDGETE
1996 I 1997 I 1998* I 1999* I 20001 2001 It..il.1Il1 CHANGE CUM. CHANGE AMOUNT
2002 TO 2001 2002 TO 2001 COLLECTED
JANUARY 6,936 5,992 6,237 13,633 13,328 15,438 .till~i.I!f1 -26.34% (26.34 2.95
FEBRUARY 5,813 4,909 5,481 11,434 14,506 15,864 ~il((~J:~il 46.27% 10.46 6.03
MARCH 5,297 7,090 6,507 12,717 9,882 11,658 i<}~tRI11 44.36% 19.66 4.37
APRIL 6,690 13,047 6,413 14,105 13,614 . 15,184 f.'1flt~~1 25.53% 21.19 4.95
MAY' 7,653 7,249 7,858 11,923 16,586 20,268.~_Il'lt1 7.77% 17.72 5.67
JUNE 7,353 8,909 18,654 18,372 23,136 21,236 .'I~;~~I<i -2.31% 13.45 5.39
JULY 12,090 15,096 27,167 27,116 29,455 ?R7?O Ii~t.lfim~ 10.98% 12.90 8.28
AUGUST 19,902 19,821 36,874 36,413 43,950
SEPTEMBER 32,021 30,050 60,278 54,899 60,994
OCTOBER 33,141 35,407 66,912 78,386 62,906
NOVEMBER 23,003 21,924 47,270 42,621 57,742
DECEMBER 12,708 9,945 30,865 40,770 24,420
TOTAL I 172.607 179.439 320.515 362.389 370.5201 ~RO RRf}IEl~lf1__1 -61.95%1 (61.95i 37.64
BUDGET 2001
N
o
Economic Development
SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
YTD
June
2001
. REVENUES
Interest on Investments
Transfer in
1,413
75,006
76,419
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENDITURES
Personnel
Supplies
Charges & Services
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
39,225
511
27,458
66,683
Revenue less Expenses
9736
%OF
Change
% of Budget
to Spend
or
Collect
76.30
50.00
50.41
50.57
69.13
57.93
21
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX #1
SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
YTD
June
2001
REVENUES
Taxes
I nterest on Investments
TOTAL REVENUES
51,572
10,031
61,603
EXPENDITURES
Transfer to Street
Debt Service
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
25,000
25,000
NET INCREASE/DECREASE
IN FUND BALANCE
36,603
FUND BALANCE
%OF
Change
% of Budget
to Spend
or
Collect
55.33
51.46
54.93
100.00
100.00
100.00
22
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX #2
SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
YTD
June
2001
REVENUES
Taxes
Interest on Investments
TOTAL REVENUES
51,572
3,654
55,226
EXPENDITURES
Debt Service
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Revenue less Expenses
55,226
Fund Balance
%OF
Change
% of Budget
to Spend
or
Collect
55.33
15.30
53.66
100.00
100.00
23
PENCOM
SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
YTD
June
2001
REVENUES
Intergovernmental:
* Other Agencies
* General Fund
911 Revenue
Interest on Investments
Miscellaneous Revenues
TOTAL REVENUES
260,536
221,804
43,442
591
60
526,433
EXPENDITURES
Personnel
Supplies
Charges & Services
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
446,441
4,584
72,443
16,340
539,808
NET INCREASE/DECREASE
IN FUND BALANCE
(13,375
FUND BALANCE
% of Budget
to Spend
or
Collect
50.01
50.00
51.53
100.00
(96.00
50.26
52.42
61.29
29.23
Nt
50.18
24
Electric Utility Fund
SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
YTD
June
2001
REVENUES
Operating Revenues
Interest on Investments
Intergovernmental (SPA - Conservation)
Construction Contribution
Other Revenue
TOTAL REVENUES
10,972,658
232,803
13,652
14,153
11,233,266
EXPENSES BY OBJECT
Personnel
Supplies
Power Purchase
Charges & Services
Utility Taxes
Return on Investment
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
500,807
133,990
7,386,234
1,461,670
657,038
29,602
4,513
10,173,854
NON-OPERATING EXPENSES
Construction Projects
Transfer to Economic Development Fund
Transfer to Equipment Services Fund
Transfer to Other Funds
Debt Service
TOTAL NON-OPERATING
357,324
37,500
209,294
604,118
Revenue less Expenses
455,294
Cash Designated for Rate Stabilization
Cash Reserved for Debt Service
Unreserved Cas Balance
1,700,000
%OF
Change
% of Budget
to Spend
or
Collect
56.62
74.86
100.00
69.38
98.49
58.30
56.76
59.73
60.49
48.10
51.69
50.00
38.03
58.48
92.73
(50.00
100.00
50.00
67.29
25
% of Budget
YTD %OF to Spend
June Change or
2001 Collect
REVENUES
Operating Revenues - Water 1,190,558 53.59
Operating Revenues: Wastewater 1,821,969 49.27
Interest on Investment 119,362 56.68
Other Revenues 30,687 59.65
TOTAL REVENUES 3,162,576 51.39
EXPENSES BY OBJECT
Personnel 562,597 1.97 52.21
Supplies 128,688 21.84 47.30
Charges & Services 1,010,128 13.40 54.55
Utility Taxes 218,505 (15.24 61.33
Capital Outlay 16,297 5.74 87.04
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,936,215 7.34 55.11
NON.OPERA TING EXPENSES
Construction Projects 782,326 76.17
Debt Service 772,604 40.55
Transfer to Economic Development 25,004 49.99
Transfer to Equipment Services Fund 100.00
Transfer to Other Funds
TOTAL NON-OPERATING 1,579,934 65.81
Revenue less Expenses (353,573 (79.30
PWTF Loan/Grants 1,030,000
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash 676,427
WATERIWASTEWATER
SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
Cash Designated for Rate Stabilization
Unreserved Cash Balance
2,000,000
2,844 911
220.13
26
% of Budget
YTD %OF to Spend
June Change or
2001 Collect
REVENUES
I
Operating ..Revenues 2.437,913 48.58
I nterest on Investments 157,541 52.27
Grants 13,299 Nt
Other Revenues 212 48.00
TOTAL REVENUES I 2,608,965 48.74
EXPENDITURES
Personnel 382,621 48.61
Supplies 23,251 76.77
Charges & Services 1,125,493 60.04
Utility Taxes 193,651 51.32
Capital Outlay Nt
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,725,016 57.05
NON-OPERATING REV. (EXP)
Construction Projects 175,275 (108.88
Transfer to Street Fund 50,002 (50.00
Transfer to Other Funds
Transfer to Equipment Services Fund 100.00
TOTAL NON-OPERATING 225,277 39.56
Transfer to Landfill Closure and Post Closure (240,696
Revenue less Expenses 417,976
SOLID WASTE
SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
Cash Reserved for Landfill Closure & Post Closure
Unreserved Cash Balance
3,530,934
3,677,871
34.26
27
% of Budget
YTD to Spend
June or
2001 Collect
REVENUES
Charges for Services 4,375 (9.60
I nterest on Investment 101,779 59.47
Interfund Charges 597,393 30.64
Miscellaneous Revenues 738 100.00
Transfer from Other Funds 100.00
TOTAL REVENUES 704,285 49.29
EQUIPMENT SERVICES
SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
EXPENDITURES
Personnel
Supplies
Charges & Services
Capital Outlay
Transfer to 1992 G.O. Bond
Debt Payment (Fire engine)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
147,410
161,723
88,091
520,371
11,263
14,289
943,147
Revenue less Expenses
(238,862
Cash Reserved for Equipment Replacement
3,919,204
50.35
54.76
57.03
66.11
50.01
50.00
57.64
1.33
28
,----
I
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30,2002
YTD
Juneo
2001
REVENUES
Interfund Charges
Interest on Investment
TOTAL REVENUES
167,244
2,829
170,073
EXPENDITURES
Personnel
Supplies
Charges & Services
Transfer to Financial System
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
103,599
9,752
24,858
138,209
Revenue less Expenses
31,864
Cash Balance
171 235
%OF
Change
% of Budget
to Spend
or
Collect
50.00
51.18
50.01
50.76
51.09
34.33
75.29
42.57
142.88
29
% of Budget
YTD %OF to Spend
June Change or
2001 Collect
REVENUES
Interest on Investment 10,974 78.93
Interfund Charges
* Dental benefits 76,978 (2.60 50.02
* Workers Compens,ation 120,643 (20.88 60.71
* Liability insurance 200,030 17.44 50.00
* Medical & Vision 657,835 20.16 48.58
* Other 21,802 6.49 49.98
TOTAL REVENUES 1,088,262 12.41 50.40
SELF INSURANCE
SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
For the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
EXPENSES BY PROGRAM
Dental benefits
Workers Compensation
Time Loss (due to Workers Comp.)
Liability insurance
Medical & Vision
Other
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
67,430
119,911
45,151
219,314
695,596
21,342
1,168,744
Revenue less Expenses
(80,482
Cash Reserved for Claims
703 806
22.16
26.53
(35.68
73.14
17.45
47.26
27.60
45.09
22.19
69.43
19.18
45.90
36.40
39.61
30
I
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FORTAN ELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
,
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
July 30, 2002
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
Yvonne Ziomkowski, Finance Director
Capital Improvement Projects
Summary: As a follow up to the City Council meetings of July 2 and July 16,2002, attached is
a prioritized list of governmental improvement projects.
Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve the list of projects and the
available funding allocations. The list includes 20 projects totaling $1,975,000.
Attached is the revised allocation plan for governmental funds. There have been a number of
issues surrounding the allocation of funds. This memo is to provide some background and
thoughts for your consideration prior to your making a decision.
The current City policy, as outlined in the Financial Management Policy, is to allocate surplus
funds from prior years to Capital Facilities Projects. 'This is one way for the citizens to see
physical improvements to the City's infrastructure that directly benefit a large portion of the
population. The City Manager feels that this is the correct approach for surplus funds. Day-to-
day operations should be addressed in the preparation and execution of the annual operating
budget and not dependent upon surplus from prior years.
Taking into account the current fiscal situation, as well as the future fiscal challenges the City
faces, it is still the position of staff to utilize surpluses for capital projects.
Staff has worked closely with the Finance Committee on the allocation of funds. It has been a
challenge to meet current commitments and attempt to move forward with projects that are vital
to the City's future.
The attached list includes several projects which are already under construction or have been
31
authorized by the Council and therefore have committed funding. The total amount for these
projects is $1,233,000.
The Fire Hall roof repairs have presented the largest funding challenge. Unfortunately, it appears
that the claim for the roof repairs will be denied by the property insurance carrier for Washington
Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA). However, WCIA has assured the City that WCIA will
aggressively pursue recovering the funds, even including litigation if necessary. So although the
City will have to pay for the roof repairs up front, the likelihood is that we will be reimbursed
eventually.
Staff is recommending moving forward with the Carnegie Library Revitalization. Greater details
are provided in the staff memo on this subject. It is proposed that the $260,000 funding shortfall
for the Carnegie'Library be funded as follows:
Funding Source Funding
Street Lighting, Street Division J $80,000,
Governmental Fund Allocation2 $110,000
Walkling Trust $50,000
2002 Projected Increase of $20,000
Revenue Receipts 3
. .
Total $260,000
I - These funds were not diverted from paving or sidewalk projects.
2 - $60,000 previously proposed and $50,000 from TR40-99, Airport Road. Additional State funds have
been made available.
3 - Sales tax revenue receipts.
Other projects, totaling $632,000, include pool renovation, sidewalk program, ADA curb
ramps/chirpers, design for 81h Street bridge replacement, Laurel Street pavers (Railroad to 151
Street), City pier dredging and piling replacement, and phase two of improvements to the City's
east entrance.
Knowing that budgeting for the year 2003 will be very challenging, the Council may designate
part of reserves toward the operating budget. If the Council decides that all or a portion of budget
surpluses should be placed in reserves for use in 2003, then the Financial Management Policy
ne~ds to be amended. This is a policy decision process that could be quickly addressed at the
next Council meeting.
Another option would be to allocate a portion of our current fund balance to be used for capital
32
outlay or capital projects in 2003. This would free other money for funding day-to-day
operations. Assuming that the City needs to maintain a minimum of 10% of fund balance in
reserves, we could designate $400,000 for use in 2003. Although the City's financial policy calls
for a minimum reserve of 10%, I actually prefer to maintain closer to a 15% fund balance. This
option can be further explored during the budget process.
33
GOVERNMENTAL FUND PROJECTS
(GROUP-ACCT -CIP-GF Allocation)
TOTAL PROPOSED CITY FUNDS
CITY CFP PROJECT PROJECT REVISED REQUESTED REQUIRED
PRIORITY # COST 2002 BUDGET 2003 2002-2003
1 PK11-02 Waterfront Trail- Ravonier Mill Site 80,000 80,000 , 80,000
2 PK02-02 William Shore Memorial Pool Renovation 3,500,000 25,000 182,000 207,000
3 PK03-02 Olympic Discoverv Trall-Ravonier to Morse Cree 290,000 36,000 114,000 150,000
4 FR02-02 Fire Station Roof Repairs 568,000 568,000 - 568,000
5 PK01-00 Francis Street Improvements 450,000 10,000 - 10,000
6 TR40-99 Lauridsen Blv.lAlrport Road Realignment 2,139,350 50,000 50,000
7 GG12-99 Laurel Street Slide Repair 225,000 185,000 - 185,000
8 PK16-99 City East Entrance - Street Trees/Improvements 75,000 25,000 25,000 50,000
9 TR61-99 8th Street Restoration 2,000,000 90,000 90,000
10 TR74-99 Sidewalk Program 435,000 25,000 25,000 50,000
,
11 GG01-02 Edlz Hook Rip Rap Repair 50,000 50,000 - 50,000
12 GG02-99 Renovate Carnegie Librarv 1,300,000 110,000 - 110,000
13 TR01-01 8th Street Bridge Replacement Design 1,400,000 - 280,000 280,000
14 TR26-99 ADA Curb, Ramps/Chirpers 100,000 20,000 - 20,000
15 PK09-02 City Pier Dredging and Piling Replacement 140,000 - 25,000 25,000
16 GG02-01 laurel Street Pavers (Railroad to 1 st Street) 350,000 - 50,000 50,000
17 TR01-02 8th Street Bridge Construction 15,000,000 - - -
18 PK12-02 Francis Street Park Landscaping 80,000 - - -
19 GG03-00 Gateway Parking 4,500,000 - - -
20 Matching Funds for Community Projects 100,000 - - -
TR02-01 Ennis Street Slide 60,000 - - -
TR18-99 LincolnlLauridsen Rechannel & Signal 453,000 - - -
TR20-99 Street Bicycle Facilities/Racks/Striping 120,000 . - - -
GG01-01 Laurel Street Stair Repair 225,000 - - -
GG13-99 Downtown Convention Center 2,000,000 - - -
TR42-99 Lauridsen Blvd. Bridge Widening 2,820,000 - - -
GG06-00 Gatewav Sign 60,000 - - -
PK05-02 Art Education Center at PAFAC 250,000 - - -
PK10-02 Marine Lab Expansion 5,050,000 - - -
GG02-02 Purchase-School District Office Property 1,000,000 - - -
GG05-00 Ennis Creek Estates 250,000 - - -
44,820,350 1,274,000 701,000 1,975,000
Projects Available for Reinstatement If Insurance proceeds
are received on Flrehall Roof Repairs:
Priority # 2 18,000 18,000
Priority # 17 - 400,000 400,000
Priority #18 20,000 20,000 40,000
Priority #19 - 65,000 65,000
Priority #20 - 40,000 40,000
20,000 543,000 563,000
1,294,000 1,244,000 2,538,000
Italic font indicates $1,233,000 of funds committed for projects already authorized
Prior Funds Available
Funds Available from 2001 Surplus
TOTAL
1,475,000
500,000
1,975,000
34
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
July 30, 2002
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
Award of Contract for Port Angeles Carnegie Library Revitalization, Project 97-08
Summary: Council directed that the Carnegie be renovated/restored based upon available
funds. Bid proposals for the Carnegie Library Revitalization, Project 97-08, were opened July 2,
and Hoch Construction, Inc., Port Angeles, W A was the lowest, responsible bidder.
Recommendation: Award and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract for the Carnegie
Library Revitalization, Project 97-08, with Hoch Construction, Inc. in the amount of
$1,105,953.32 for the base bid and all additive bid items. Also, direct the Public Works and
Utilities Director to issue a notice to proceed only for the base bid. Upon receipt of
additional funds the Director shall issue additional notices to proceed for the additive bid
items.
Background / Analysis:
This issue was presented to Council on July 16, 2002 and deferred to permit a review of the 2002
fiscal budget execution and the allocation of general governmental funds. Attached is the
Council memo addressing the award of the contract to revitalize the Carnegie Library dated July
16, 2002.
The financing plan has changed since the attached memo has been drafted. This may influence
Council's decision on how to proceed with the Carnegie Library Revitalization. First, the
Walkling Trust indicated that $200,000 would be made available but, due to the significant down
turn in investments, the original funding is not available immediately. The Walkling Trust has
been requested to commit $50,000 to the project by September 1, 2002 and another $50,000 by
September 1,2003. They have indicated that $50,000 would be available on or about September
1, 2002, but they are not able to make firm commitment on the second $50,000. It is their desire
to make all of the funds available eventually. Secondly, Washington Cities Insurance Authority
(WCIA) has informed the City that our property insurance claim will likely be denied by
WCIA's property insurance carrier for the repairs on the fire hall roof. The issue in dispute is
whether design flaws are an exclusion within the coverage. WCIA has indicated that upon receipt
of the formal denial they will initiate legal action to force payment. They have also indicted that
resolution of this issue may take one or more years.
35
August 6, 2002 City Council
RE: Carnegie Library Revitalization, Project 97-08
Page 2
The Council is faced with a decision on how to proceed with the revitalization project. Bids by
the contractors are good until August 30,2002 at which time they will expire. If the project is
not awarded in the very near future, the current construction season may be lost. No detailed
discussions with the low bidder have taken place.
The following options are available for Council to consider:
I - Award the project for the base bid only. The shortfall of $260,000 would be funded as
follows:
Funding Source
Street Lighting, Street Division I
Governmental Fund Allocation2
Funding
Walkling Trust
2002 Projected Increase of
Revenue Receipts 3
$80,000
$110,000
$50,000
$20,000
Total
$260,000
I - These funds were not diverted from paving or sidewalk projects.
2 - $60,000 previously proposed and $50,000 from TR40-99, Airport Road. Additional State funds have
been made available.
3 - Sales tax revenue receipts.
2 - Reject bids. Do not perform the project until funds are available.
3 - Reject bids. Modify contract documents to reduce the amount of restoration in the project
and perform a large amount of renovation. This will delay the project 9 months and increase
design services. Potential exists that the State grant will be authorized and funds may be used to
assist in funding the base bid. If the Walkling Trust does not contribute, the grant may be in
jeopardy since the application indicated their participation.
4 - Reject bids. Consider a publically supported bond either as a stand alone or with another City
project. Potential exists to delay project for one or more years; The highly visible building will
continue to be a detractor to the downtown area.
It is recommended that the Council consider allocating funds as recommended to move forward
with the Carnegie Library Revitalization. This facility is a major landmark in the City. It will be
36
August 6, 2002 City Council
RE: Carnegie Library Revitalization, Project 97-08
Page 3
utilized by the ClallamCounty Historical Society as an interactive museum attracting tourists
and by the students of Clallam County.
The following table reflects a revised funding the project.
Funding for Construction
(Revised July 30, 2002)
Source Status Amount Planning
Bud2et
City - 2001& Prior Available $800,000 $800,000
City - 2002 Pending $60,000 $210,000
Walkling Trust Requested $200,000 $50,000
Sub Total $1,060,000 $1,060,000
State Grane Requested $205,000 $100,000
Federal Grane Requested $252,000 $0
Potential Total $1,457,000 $1,106,000
Notes:
1 - Washington State Heritage Grant $340,000 ($205,000 for construction and $135,000 for furnishings, etc).
Committee decision to be made late August/early September with funds available July 1,2003. Anticipate a 50%
award. Therefore, $100,000 for construction. Work may not start on grant funded items until afterJuly 1,2003.
2 - Federal Save America's Treasures Grant $252,000. Structure must be on the National Historic Register and
have national historic significance. The Carnegie Library does not meet the minimum criteria. Therefore, it is not
anticipated any funds will be made available.
N:\CCOUNCIL\CCAward_B_Camegie Library.wpd
37
~r 'OR.r.'P;.. N. ELES
' " ,_, 1 ~ . <
! . '.' '.! ,I , :'
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
July 16, 2002
To:
MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities
SUBJECT:
Award of Contract for Port Angeles Carnegie Library Revitalization, Project 97-08
Summary: Council directed that the Carnegie be renovated/restored based upon available
funds. Bid proposals for the Carnegie Library Revitalization, Project 97-08 were opened July 2,
and Hoch Construction, Inc., Port Angeles, W A was the lowest, responsible, and responsive
bidder.
Recommendation: Award and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract for the Carnegie
Library Revitalization, Project 97-08, with Hoch Construction, Inc. in the amount of
$1,105,953.32 for the base bid and all additive bid items. Also direct the Public Works and
Utilities Director to issue a notice to proceed only for the base bid. Upon receipt of
additional funds the Director shall issue additional notices to proceed for the additive bid
items.
Backa:round I Analysis:
Bids were opened on July 2, 2002 for the subject project. The contract documents required a base
bid, and seven additive bid items, to ensure that the project could be awarded within available
funds and that restoration work was prioritized by order of significance. Five bidders responded
and the results are as noted on the attached sheet. Four of the five bidders are local. Hoch
Construction, Port Angeles, is the lowest, responsible, and responsive bidder with a base bid of
$957,346.03. Hoch Construction remains the low bidder for all additive bid items with a total
price of$I,105,953.32. Attached is the bid results.
The project consists of a complete revitalization of the Carnegie Library. The revitalization will
include a structural retrofit, handicap access, installation of heating and ventilation, as well as
significant historical restoration. Prioritization of work for the additive bid items (see attached)
was developed with input from the Clallam County Historical Society and the Clallam County
Heritage Advisory Committee. Representing these groups was Frank Ducceschi, Vice President
Historical Society and June Robinson, President Historical Society and Chairperson Heritage
Advisory Committee.
38
July 16, 2002 City Council
RE: Port Angeles Carnegie Library Revitalization, Project 97-08
Page 2
Funding for this project comes from several sources as identified below in Table I.
Table I: Funding for Construction
City - 2001& Prior Available $800,000 $800,000
City - 2002 Pending $60,000 $60,000
Walkling Trust Requested $200,000 $200,000
Sub Total' $1,060,000 $1,060,000
State Grant1 Requested $205,000 $100,000
Federal Granf Requested $252,000 $0
Potential Total $1,457,000 $1,106,000
Notes:
1 - Washington State Heritage Grant $340,000 ($205,000 for construction and $135,000 for furnishings, etc).
Committee decision to be made late August/early September with funds available July 1,2003. Anticipate a 50%
award. Therefore, $100,000 for construction. Work may not start on grant funded items until after July 1,2003.
2 - Federal Save" America's Treasures Grant $252,000. Structure must be on the National Historic Register and have
national historic significance. The Carnegie Library does not meet the minimum criteria. Therefore, it is not
anticipated any funds will be made available.
Please note that this project was developed with resources including $200,000 from the Walkling
Trust, from which we have previously received their promise to designate funds. However, their
commitment has been impacted by the overall economy in terms of reinvestment and by the
condition that their money be "last in" and part of other leveraged funds. It is felt that this
commitment can be firmed during the project and that there is room for future CFP resources as
experienced in past years. The major point here is that we are proceeding with a somewhat soft
commitment to award the project now, knowing that it is necessary to have control to acquire
these resources later.
39
July 16, 2002 City Council
RE: Port Angeles Carnegie Library Revitalization, Project 97-08
Page 3
The cost estimate for the base bid and additive bid items is summarized below in Table II.
Table II: Low Bid Construction Funding Required
Item Cost w/Sales Tax Cumulative Cost Grant Funding Potential
Base Bid $957,346.03 $957,346.03 Not Eligible
Additive Bid #1 $7,403.04 $964,749.07 $7,403.04
Additive Bid #2 $6,723.55 $971,472.62 $14,126.59
Additive Bid #3 $24,886.00 $996,358.62 $39,012.59
Additive Bid #4 $59,937.39 $1,056,296.01 $98,949.98
Additive Bid #5 $37,745.57 $1,094,041.58 $136,695.55
Additive Bid #6 $6,190.12 $1,100,231.70 $142,885.67
Additive Bid #7 $5,721.62 $1,105,953.32 $148,607.29
Contingency $100,000
The base bid plus the contingency totals $1,060,000. Because of the nature of the work involved
with major renovation/restoration of older structures, a $100,000 contingency is considered
essential to the success of the project. As the project approaches its final stages, the contingency
can be released for additional additive work as appropriate.
It is recommended that the base bid and all additive bid items be awarded but a notice to proceed
be issued only for the base bid work. A warding all items at this time will preserve the additive
bid prices until July 1,2003. If the additive bid items are not awarded a potential exists for the
prices to be increased. The notice to proceed for the seven added items does not have to be
issued until July 1, 2003. If funds do not become available from the grant then those additive bid
items would be deleted from the contract by a change order.
Attachments: Bid Tabulation
Additive Bid Item Descriptions
N:\CCOUNCIL\CC2002\CC07I 6\CCA ward _ A_Carnegie Library.wpd
40
Bid Alternate 1:
Bid Alternate 2:
Bid Alternate 3:
Bid Alternate 4:
Bid Alternate 5:
Bid Alternate 6:
Bid Alternate 7:
BID ALTERNATES
Wood Flooring Finished - Repair and Refinish Upper Floor Wood
Flooring
Brick Masonary Veneer - Furnish Masonry-veneer Chimneys above roof
Castings - Cast Iron Front Porch Candelabrum
Ornamental Sheet Metal - Furnish Pediment and Pilaster Scrolled-caps
with Cresting Leaves
Ornamental Metal Castings - Furnish Bronze Marquee Cresting
and
Ornamental Sheet Metal - Furnish Copper Marquee Cladding
Ornamental Sheet Metal - Replicate Conductor Heads, Caps and
Downspout Brackets
Finish Carpentry and Wood Flooring - Install salvaged wood flooring in
downstairs Meeting Room
/.;
41-A
n:\projecls\9708\restorationlbidtab.xls
BID TABULATION FOR CARNEGIE LIBRARY REVITALIZATION
PROJECT NAME Revitalization of The Port Angeles Carnegie Library
PROJECT NO: 97-08
DATE: 07/02/02
"The basis for determining the lowest responsible bid shall be the base
bid plus the sum of those alternates which, in numerical order, are within
the City's available funds." Total available funds are $1,000,000.
Architect's Hoch Construction Aldergrove Const. Vision Builders Inc. Primo Construction Steele-Corp.
Estimate Inc. (Port Angeles) Inc. (Port Angeles) (Port Angeles) Inc. (Carlsborg) Electric (Edmonds)
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT (inc. tax) AMOUNT (inc. tax) AMOUNT (inc. tax) AMOUNT (inc. tax) AMOUNT (inc. tax) AMOUNT (inc. tax)
Base Bid $852,940.60 $957,346.03 $1,144,644.55 $983,538.00 $981,885.79 $1,233,480.00
Alternate 1 $20,017.00 $7,403.04 $11,051.55 $13,508.77 $22,228.61 $23,419.89
Subtotal $872,957.60 $964,749.07 $1,155,696.10 $997,046.77 $1,004,114.39 $1,256,899.89
Alternate 2 $14,390.60 $6,723.55 $11,196.54 $10,390.45 $6,608.86 $15,571.06
Subtotal $887,348.20 $971,472.62 $1,166,892.64 $1,007,437.22 $1,010,723.25 $1,272,470.95
Alternate 3 $12,118.40 $24,886.00 $14,542.08 $15,236.72 $18,022.87 $14,747.66
Subtotal $899,466.60 $996,358.62 $1,181,434.72 $1,022,673.94 $1,028,746.12 $1,287,218.61
Alternate 4 $53,126.20 $59,937.39 $59,113.99 $56,664.34 $59,451.57 $62,245.30
Subtotal $952,592.80 $1,056,296.01 $1,240,548.71 $1,079,338.28 $1,088,197.70 $1,349,463.91
Alternate 5 $39,925.80 $37,745.57 $42,153.64 $19,523.61 $36,448.25 $53,245.22
Subtotal $992,518.60 $1,094,041.58 $1,282,702.34 $1,098,861.89 $1,124,645.95 $1,402,709.13
Alternate 6 $4,652.60 $6,190.12 $6, I 07.89 $6,126.28 $6,223.66 $6,086.25
Subtotal $997,171.20 $1,100,231.70 $1,288,810.23 $1,104,988.17 $1,130,869.61 $1,408,795.38
Alternate 7 $7,033.00 $5,721.62 $15,341.68 $7,748.20 $7,809.88 $10,760.49
TOTAL $1,004,204.20 $1,105,953.32 $1,304,151.91 $1,112,736.37 $1,138,679.49 $1,419,555.87
1 I I I I I
Page 1
,..-i
~
CLALLAM COUNTY HERITAGE ADVISORY BOARD
21 July 2002
To Members: Port Angeles City Council
F or the past few years the Heritage Advisory Board has written to you:
First - urging you to take steps to preserve the Carnegie Library Building
Second - to congratulate you on your plans to preserve the Carnegie Library
Building
Now - to urge you to vote yes to take the steps that will actually preserve/
restore the Carnegie Library Building
The Carnegie Library building is one of the "gems" of downtown Port Angeles.
There is an unofficial, but very large group of people in the United States who
"collect" Carnegie buildings. That is, they travel around the country looking for the
buildings, visiting and enjoying them. Port Angeles has an opportunity to become
part of that heritage tourism program.
If, as suggested, steps are taken to provide a place for information about the history
of Clallam County and Port Angeles in the building for enjoyment of tourists and
edification of residents and students, the Carnegie Library building will again
become a premier source of information.
We urge you to vote now to take the steps to restore the Carnegie Library Building.
Award the contract which will take advantage of the good weather to replace the
room and initiate the other restoration/repair projects. This step will return the
building to its former glory as the intellectual center of Port Angeles and fulfill the
desires of many residents of the community.
June Robinson
Chairman
941 East Alder Street
Sequim, Washington 98382
42
The CLALLAM COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
PO Box 1327
Port Angeles, Washington 98362-0224-
Telephone: 360-4-52-2662
July 21, 2002
Museum: First and Oak Street
Downtown Port Angeles
Lincoln School Complex
9th at C Street
Administration Office
Archives Library
Artifact Storage Facility
Genealogy Library
To Members: Port Angeles City Council
I urge you to take the necessary steps now to restore one of the architectural gems of Port
Angeles -- the Carnegie Library Building at Second and Lincoln -- by awarding the contract that
will do exactly that.
The Carnegie Library was built with funds from the Carnegie Foundation at the request of the
Port Angeles City Council in 1918. It was dedicated in January 1919. Earlier, the City Council
had to lobby the US Congress for permission to build the library at that place. It played an
important part in the intellectual life of generations of Port Angeles citizens for years.
By awarding the contract at this time, you can still take advantage of the "weather window" and
have a few good weeks of summer to re-roof the structure. Restoration of various features~
including windows, entrance details, etc. have been prioritized. By doing the most important
work first, you will be honored among citizens for taking the first steps toward restoring this gem
of a building for generations to come.
The building may play an important role in planning for heritage tourism for Port Angeles.
Heritage tourism is one of the biggest draws for many people in considering vacation plans. We
have here a building with a future rooted in the past which can play an important role in
developing such activities.
Thank you for your consideration
-<J~ ~~~
June Robinson
President
IIIII
Lincoln School- the Future Home of the Museum
43
I
'1!i- ,
.' ),,'
'.
I
. . I
.'earfinaneiIIRe '
'.1
I
'.''''
Mid-Year Review
.~) Evaluate goals and objectives
~) What is the status of our projects?
, Ct Evaluate revenue trends
Ct Review expensesincompa'rison with
the budget
, Ct Review reserves level
. . . . .. . . .
, c.) Do we need' budget amendments?
. . .
. ~) Any possibility of budgetary savings?,
. 1
;,
./
(
e~
, ,
Mid-Year Revie,w Cont.
, '
c~ ~ny' pp~Sibility of m~re revef1ue?
e Evaluate level of our services
. ,
~) ~eview pr9gress on capital projects,
, .' .
'~) Revise 'CIP list "
, ,
~) Ani' new ,ri'eeds or emergencies?
, . - . - .
c.) Prepare for the new budget cycle
" ,
" ,
e...
, ~\.
City Wide Overview
, '
f) Overall - 560/0 of City Budget left to
spend' ' ,
C~ Personnel - 51.60/0 unexpended
~) Supplies - 600/0' unexpended
, ~) Charg'es for services - 46.40/0
ynexpe,nded ,"
~) Capital outlay and projects - 84.50/0 left
to complete" .",' , '
2
~..
I
...
.
(";.;'
r--------. ---~~-n----.l
I. b ~ ~jJill:GJillJ@
..~
General Governmental
Fund Types
. Proprietary
.-J
Self Insurance
.
3
01
I. .
I. .
I
'.'
-..........'................
','It
':,'l
'+
-........................
'.~'
Genercil.Fuiid Revenue's
. .
C~ Total revenue collected $6,368,944 or ~9Ao/0'
c')This is 4..40/0J)r $291,383 less than last year"
f)Taxes, repre~enting Go%of GFrevenue" are
at SOA%:coUected ($3,977,133)" this is '.
.'al.mostA% f1l9re than"last y~ar .'
c')'Intergovernmental -$271,161 or'61 % '
,collecte,d : .' "
f) Licenses & Permits are 290/0 morethan at the
same time 'last year and~re' 360/0' collected
.' 4
r-
"
.' I
.
General. Fund Revenues....
YTD YTD %of
June June Variances
2002 2001 , ,
,
Taxes 3,977,133 3,827,627 3.91
. ,
Licenses & Permits 92,255 71,308 29.38
Intergo\Smmental 271,161 2~2,364 ~(3.97)
Charges for SeMces 1,642,863 1,946,604 ' (15.60),
Fines & Forfeitures 113,374 159,927 (29.11 )
Miscellaneous 145,056 237,903 (39.03)
Transfers - in 127,102 134,594 .(5.57)
Total 6,368,944 6,660,327 (4.37)
General Fund Revenues...
4,0.0.0.,0.0.0.
3,50.0.,0.0.0.
3,0.0.0.,0.0.0.
2,50.0.,0.0.0.
2,0.0.0.,0.0.0.
1,50.0.,0.0.0.
1,aOp,aaa
50.0.,0.0.0.
a
-< 'l>l-e~ ;"~S e~~ Ai,Ces, . ~'(rtO eP'V-s , \~
" ~e .~~ Se'" ~e~ '&'().~ ~e'(S
, , r#> 'b- o~e '\0'( 'b- ~o \Sce -(.(3-~s
e~r:> ':\.e'(($ "es rtO" ~ ,
\).0 \~ v~'().'('o ~,~ '
5
e!
General Fund Revenues Cont. "
. , .. .
, f) MedicOf1e'is 100/0 more than last ye'ar
and 540/0 collected'
, ,
C~ FiDeS and Forfeitures are 290/0 less than
last 'year 'a'nd 47010 collected' ~" .
f) Interest is '520/0 collected but 290/0
below Jast year levels'
e'j
Stiles"Tax
, Co) Accounts for 170/0 of total GF revenues
(used to 'represent 220/0 ofGF)
C~ Decreasing tax base
f) 2002 .receipts,are,?O/omore than last
. year-at thi~ time", but 40/0 less than iQ
2000,~nd 60/~ less t~an in ,1998
c.~ Increase in construction activities
I'
"
6
"
e
e
o
..\ ~\ ~. ~ ~\. 0 ~\ , ~ ~ ~ ~
~... ~., ~~" _,,'1>-""\ . ~~ )~..... :;:,C:i ~0 ~0 ~0 ~0
~.;s ~.;s ~'ljl ~ ~. 'S ...~<:$ 0<$' if \0<$' ./If
'S /,(lj . . , ~ 0 0'" V'" .
, . 00'<, .~ ()0
Cdmponentsof Sales Tax
.7
T
,I
I: '.
. "
. .
,. ",'
",
,?-.
Utility Taxes'
.. .
~) Se~6nd I~rgest source. of revenue
. . .
~) 51 % collected
. . . . +
. . .
.' ~) 8.7,0/0 more tha~'last year
. '". - . . .
~) Increases in.water,wasteWater, ~nd
electric utility rates .'
l, ___
8
I "
"
.' I
.
Intergovernmental Revenues'
Ct State local assistance program
$124,595 (eliminated hi 2003)
,8 Liquor Excise Tax 53.50/0 collected,
1.40/0 higher than last ye~r .,
,f) Liqqor Board Profits 47.20/0 cO,lIected,
30/0 more than last year
c. Criminal Justice collection only 290/0
':collected
.
(. :
YieldCurv~
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1 .
o
,I
, , '
3 month 6 month 2 year
5 year 10 year 30 year
.9
)
.-
.-....'.....'...;
'.'2"
. ..' ,,"
rnterl!;st~~yenut: Cont'd
US TRfllSlll1V ~{B T Z '.. 01101 IIlIH+ 110CH .. Gwt GY
~ _ ,'M i d L 1 n e fD~ 1lI_.... . ( 2.19/19). BGN.@13:00'
-~lIlg ..... '
Chart f.' pe' II d II . ". ". . '.;J
, . . . A~ ~""lng Avl'l'l!.lles "
r!.. .j ......I........+.......t..... ~ . ...~...- L..._. 1........;........i ': 1 Teu~
\' : , ,...._1!J1 : . .... ...........-... r'/
~:. ,i ":..L:..:::t:~::t:....~!. ~T' ~ f....~-i ...-+.:..+......!.......:{-- .:'~.
. . '1'1' ---...-......... " . fl
." I ..).....\.1........1.......l. !~: "j" .~~h..~...T::.....;---..~.;....7 r'T/
. /.. .!. ......; . ...1.......1 T":-r :' ..:~.:-(...; '''.. ;....... ~. .....[.
.' '. -----.-... .......... . .I.' :' , I
[....:1'\0 ....L..'-Lr-;:~b. --... j......L"/
"b:i _1-... i --i" -1...L..! r- r i-j" "l/!?J_onl'l ..
.....: . j i j j i, i ......T.....'!"'.. .Ton...t....... 'l"r' "
f=Z---r-.ur......+ ......~........l...., . i. . ! :::1J' I "
I I ..............-...... .......:.. '. : .
_... . no, I _ .- I ~lIL l~ r;:::b. ......,..... '-...... ~
.....:::~.~=_.J t::,: .............. .::.,:-~.. ! -. I ~"" ~~
I'~ : ~~su.,.......ai:~"Ou.s. tll3i.~ [.ryl~~~~..:
",";ill)~[8' . ... 0'...._ ZiIr.JuI-ll/: 1:jJ'h'..
e,..
..X
..
I (
General Fund ExpenditZ{r~s:
. ~ 53.50/0 of budget left to spend
f) Seasonal expenses
. :'3 Parks'maintenance .
~3 Capital purchases
~3 Transfers for street projects .
, C-) Personnel expenses on target with almost
520/0.unexpended . .
, C-) Supplies and charg~s for s~rvices i;3re belqw
last year and almost 530/0 unexpended
10
L
:,.
, , . ~ -. !.. .:f.J~ , l' .
~ ,
, , -
~ ~ . ""' .' < " \
(Jeneral,Fl1nd Exp~n4itu:res. .~.
~ener~1 Fund '~pend'itures.
YTO
June'
',2002
:YTD
June'-
2001',
%of '
Variances
, Personnel cost 4,397;246,: 4,410,419 ' (0.30) , ..
Suppli,es 204,397' 246; 798 (17.15)
Charges fo'r' SenAces': 900;'464 953,081 (5.52)
: Intergqverrimental ,452,342 . 374844 . 20.67
.. .. '.'~
Capi,taIOutlay. 14,324 54,055 , (73.50)
Transfers - out . , 27,502 317;502 (91.34)
: Total " 5,996;275 6,356,609 (5.67) .
.
1998'
1999
2000
2001
,2902
budget.
2002
est.
11
, ,:
::
-'.~...,....,............"'"''
",,>
.- <"'-"
- -
fo~sibl~,BJ4,dget Changes
f) Jail co?ts--rl1ay need an additional inrfunding
$20,000-$30,000
- -
Co) Airport ~etLirfty~ YTD e~penses $26,-500
Co) Sprinkler system -(City Pier) $25,000'
C~ Vacation pay- QLJtfor Information Technology
Manager _
-' "
- .
."...-..,.,.':
,<,,-,
::
Ennis: Creek Estates
- -
c.) $9.?~,190 ~alloqri' payment -_Sept.~,
2003 ~n'd $6.3~ 190 interestpC3ym~nt on
Sept. 1, 2002 (total amount
$1~016,380) -.'
- -t~ LI.D Guaranty $435;000
~o] LID cgntrol $~57,00Q
to] Ut,i1ities (~pp~oxir:nately ~O%) $106,552
to] Interest revenue $18,000
12
'.
. . .' . . .
IIIIIIII fill...'
4,000,000
3,500,000
" 4,500,000,'
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000 '
o
1996 1997 1998' 1999. 2000 2001' 2002
Budget
'.
,'I
General Fulid Reserves'
Ct CurrentFinancialManagement Policy sets
minimum fund ,balance at 100/0 of GF
expenditures, this is approximately $1.5
millidn' ....
Ct Same policy requires, the City to designate
budgetary "surplus" to capital projects .
OCt As of 12/31/2001, our reserves are $2.4,
milliopand include $500,000 or 2001 ,
budgetary surplu.s ...
13
e
Options.. .
. -. ,
f) Designate $500,000 from 2001 'towards CIP
8 Change Financial Management Policy,'and
designate all or part of $500,000 towards,
2003 operating ,budget
f) Designate $500,000 towards,CIP and allocate
portion of ,current reserVes towards 2003 "
operating budget (without 'going below
required 100/0 level)
.
Outlookfor the 'Future..,.
Forecast
Budget
2002
Rewnues 12,881,954
Operating Exp. 12,499,196
Capital Exp.lCIP' 382,757
Rewnue less Exp. 0
Ending Fund Balance* 2,440,620
Projected
2003 2004
12,836,496 12,997,901
12,958,353 13,396,757
250,000 250,000
(371,857) (648,856)
2,068,763 1,419,907
, Forecast
2005 2006
13,162,712 13,301,033
13,853,681 14,330,152
250,000' 250,000 '
(940,969) (1,279,119)
478,938 (800,181)
* Ending Fund Balance for 2002 includes $500,000 "surplus" from 2001 budget
Assumptions:
* COLA 2,5% in 2003, 2.7% after
* Medical Insurance 12% in 2003, 5% after
* Liability Insurance 5% in 2003, 3.5% after
* no increase in number of personnel
14
"
I
CFrir~cast.
..
16,000,000
14,000,000
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
. 4,000,000
2,000,000
o
-2,000,000 . .
. ,999 p,c\t~ ~~~\fOt~f~tf~~fO;~~t~fOtf~fOteCa~
. Revenues
. Expenses
. .
[J Reserves I
'l>
e~
"11'FlIII
15
. ~
-"
'f> Only 450/0 o( gas
taxes collected
C~ Collection 8% lower .
than 2001 and.110/0
. below 2000
~ AlmostSO%
support:ed by
property taxes' and
transfers from GF--:
. .
C~ 29% from gas taxes
(declining trend)
, ..-.
f> 160/0 from other
transfers'
a $100,000 REET #1
a 'Solid Waste $125,000
-:
30
.!
~ 20
~
..
a..
...
10
.' ...""""... ~~ ...",,<f' ...",,<t" ~""., ...",,<6> ~q;. ~<6> ~<fl> <6'<S> rf>~~
. rf>~'
~
390
380
Cb<fl CbCb" Cbcfr Cbr$> n.~ Cbct> Cb~ Cbq;. Cb~ Cb~ f;:)tS' f;:)~"
" " " " "J" " ".," " q; q;
Street Reserves
T'
h 600
o
U
$,400
a
n
d
$
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
16
~--------;--
. .
,
, \,
.:'"
I
! '
Good,Newsl' .
. ", " ,.- c.. "
"f) An $80 ,bOOsa'{,rj~s';,wHt be .
, realized, as m'oneYii,
. bydgeted for S!r~~t
", ,L.ightipgrn~y"',no~4~e ,used.:
. for another St~e~.tpr9ject..
.:1
" .
:17
I
I
i
,I
" '
.e.+
. . . , . -
Governmental CapitqlProjects "
~ Airpo(,~Road
'Realignrn~nt
cost' to date
$2.4fV1 .
($~,16?,~41
in 20Pl);~ .
funded by TIS
grant; needs
$50,OPO to be '
completed .
-j, .... ..
Governmental Capital Projects
f) Francis Street Park, total
, cost to, date $867,545
R $384,859'property ,
acquisition' ,
'm Design $37,593
, tl Constructiqn~~5,0~~
f) Avai,lable.Eund~*~p9,281.
t::' $272,000 lAC grant .'
E-:: $22,423 donation f~om
'Soroptiniist Jet Set
'E-:: $190,000 suppolte
by GF
. 18
,'~
. Other Authorized Projects. .
..
. .
. . ..,. ,
.. c~ $80~000 YVaterrrontTrail
. .
~) $25,000 Pool.'renov~tion,visibility stu~Y
, . ".,..;.. .y. .
.' ~ $568,000 .~ir~ Station roof. repair
~) $150,OOOOlympicO'iscovery Trail
. , .;.... ,
, c.) $185,000 ,LaureL'Stre'et'Repair
, , .
~) $50~000 E?iz.J-Io~k rip r~prepair,
c.) $25,000 C~ty ea,st entrance trees
.e.
CIP 2002/2003 '
.~,jpg.;,iq~I!!cJ.es;;.
~'exfsting,funds
001 "surplus'~
.~
19
."
'e~
'" .
f), $2~,000. City east entrance
'trtes;'C?0?3) ..'
. f) .$50;OQO,!iidevyalk program
. . (2002/2003) ....
. . . . . .
f) $1.1.0,000' c.arl1~~ie Lib~~ryf
C~$20;000 .ADftcLJrb' .
ramps/charges '(2002) .
. . .
f) $18i,000'pq6Ir~noy~tion.;"
f) $280,000 8th.St. bridge.. ,:
repl~cement .~esign .' ..:
f) $25,000 City Pier dreqgillg
and 'piling replacement
~)$50,000.Laurel Stree~ pavers
-......'..............:..
'.ir
;; .
,C~ To avvard contract for base
bid and allo,^, $100,000 for
contingency 'weneed . .
$1,099,oqo ....' . . ':r'.
C~ Proposed Funding sources':
H Existing funds.$800,000,'
, t: .Savings from street lighting ,
$80,000: '. .. ..
ti Governmental fund allocation
,$1~0,000 ,: ,
t.: Walkling Trust $50,000
E': 2'002 additional revenue receipts
$29,000 .
20
.
...
'.:
Other Governm'entatFunds
. . . .
, , ,
, , ,
, ,
f) Hotel/Motel Tax Fund ".'._ ~ ,~' i '
:.: 300/0 of .revenue collected '.fIiIII'
:.: 130/0 more than last year ,,'
':om Unusually high receipts for 'December, "
, January, andFebryarv:activ!ties ,
':.: $100,DOO designated forConvention
, Center
f) REETs,
':-: 450/0 of taxes collected
, '
. ,
:om Same as 'Iast y~ar
.:,
.'1
...........
.,
...1..
: 21
, .:
-~
Vtiliti~s (E.nte rp rise funds}
.~) Expe~ses .$4~.5 milli!Jn . ." ....'
. e Accounts for over 600/0 of total City expenses
e Rates are set to recover' operating cost~ debt
payment; and to fund capital projects
. . Water/Wastewater .. Electric 0 Solid Waste
. ::
.....s'
"
. ,
Utilities.. '.
- ......
Cash Balances - Utilities
12'
10
t/) 8:.
c 6"
~
:=4
2
o
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 . YTD
2002
\- Electric - Water/Wastewater -:-- Solid Waste
22
. ,
~O7l211/02
ftl 303 623 1508
NTH? - MPRO
10:46
/
I
\
\
141 004
30 MilIiott ~ers LeD~heri TheiriTrips Because of Culture
. . \
Panners in Tourism ~mmiss~oned the Tl'avel Inclusuy Association 6f ~eriea to add a ~eries of questions to its
January 2001 Nation~l 1ra1/$1 Survey. The purpose was to'determme the length of time that 1nlvelers e:lttend
their trips because ofoulturGl activities ot' events. This included n~{eler$ who added tim~ either when they were
plarrtt.iflg the trip or while on the trip. This study underscores the irhpon:bce of arts and culture as an effective
product for tourism professionals to IIW'kct their communities both' dome&ica.Ily and m.temationaIly.
92.7 MD110D TnveIen Included Culture 00 their Tn)!. . , . .
tTwo=tbitc!S(651fmcnttof~Cii1adulnrivelers say' ~mcludi5d"iCiitWtil,~lU1S,.heritage.or.historic
. ~Vl~.ot eve;t~6t1ittiroiSO m~~~t11()1'e, o~ay.,~€fu1:Ft X~~ '11iis.eqUat~..t~~~'ffii!ltQa
CCW~~J2:-~s.~~~~ettll'iii:~~~h1~-6.I.. ~t-O'f~lerscl~..d:f[na,veifiClUdedl'
~~)I~..antage or Jiistonc iiCtiVlD'_Or event on"~.P4S!:~ear ti1lf1\
,~. . -1,-...... - .. --.----- ..-;.... _-... - L...;.",,;,..-.Ll
l.~~~i~a~ill h~~,~~~~.~uch'M,aJ)l1ildjng,..b.iIDSfi~ta..Q.r.~~~o~i\iirity;~remair1~"~.tlu:-most.popular'
. (~~~t~!.fyi~:~il[~~in.~~(~t.~:~t>-~~ultJraY~Je~.~cii?~~g in this actiyity wh\l~~o.n.amp.liithF
~past.yearl;;Partigp~n.m~tbis'~l!!..ty-"ias. remained fll1'ly~c?~trsmcdJ 998,..w.b~fl41 P.erpent ofttaVel~
claim" they.visited historie-sil=s.J . I \
, I,
l~~ m:e.a&Q_P9PWar_With.t;ra!lelersl,with~30_percent.~clUdi%1i!.this-acti,nty_.Ttljs~~ Other
cu.ltunl actiYi1ies AmCric;~ ~QY while on flips away- from home ihcludc live theater (23 percent). art plleries
(21 percent), herita.~ or ethnic i:stivals (20 percent) and ri1lfSic can~erts (19 'percent). When compared to t 998,
mast oftbese cuJ~ activities showed little or no change ip partic~pation ra~. The only activity that show~ a
substantial increase/ is attendance a live theater performanc~, which) increased: from 19 percent in 1998 to 23
pe.rc:ent in 2000. ! ' . \,
, ,
"'lQntlp or 143".3 million u.s. Adult 1ravelers Ihllt Incl,!ded
Cll,......Iar.nla on TriP. of 50+ Mil.. During ,... YUl' i!
I
I
Any CUllllrll
1-:1""-",,,- ....
\-rrlc..
~ ......-J
J.M TMan
,
,'1'(
43% (41.0 MIIII(ln,
. . J
30" <"2.6 milllOl'l) I \, I
-23% (32.8 million)
21,. .(30.2 million)
.: Al'tiial..~
d
~r~,w.nlll ffttlnl
i
) ClplIrlf Clall:ll ean."
/ "
1lIn. PlrfIllrm_
I
II
r04lll'Y~ UC.nry AIIRII1I1
! \ I'IlnI '-.cMI
\
\
I
1 ctI1.r~rt
I
ou..rjCUlVat~
20.,. (29.1 million)
10,," {13.1 milliG/l)
9'1(, (13~S mllHan)
S~ (T.O Milion)
1"~ (20.4 milian)
,
I~
Q"JI.
!fI'f.
~
-
1ft
NDte: M~lliple'~ allowed.
oovn;e: !Pan_s Ur Toarl.Tm aha TrlMlfndll.J/ry .uso.:jQtKlII (Jf Arrrt:ri~
. j
, !
/
65"4
r mllHo"l
I
I
\
\
\
.,
\
1
\
\
\
Wfo
7'0%'
\
1
" -:::~..07/26!02 10:04:8
I
'5'1 3,03 623 1508
;:
NTH? - J1PkO
. ,
141 007
i I,' \
FACTS ABOIJT mSTORIC/CULTURAL TRAVELERS
. mf-tliOSe,tra.v.elers~W1iO~adaoo7tiin~t"O:tlre:rr:.tfjp:-tO.S~Cifi@l~.$~a' histo~c1cu1tural-event~
(i3~percent~~aae-d part~f.O'rie."dty:;~'17P~r~nt-rdacd~ne.:.exti:'l;.ni@t:;1~~p!;J:~e'nt.adcieci"l;r
(eXtfif1iigl:i.ts.and~8ij.6th'e'r.7 pgcen(ailded.three~or~mor-e'iextra~nigh'rs\, .becalfSe"ol~this.actiYiiY or
event ' ",
. \
. Historic/cultural travelers are slightly older than other U.S. travelerS (48 VS. 46) and they are
mo~ likely to have a post-graduate education (23% Ivs. 20010). One-third (34%) are 55 or
cl~. ' I
. "\
. 1une, July and August are the ~ost popul~ month? for historic andcultutal travel.
, ' "I
. Seventeen percent of'historic/~ultural trarelers parti-ci,pate in 4+ activities while travelini.
compared to just 5 percent of total travelrtS. ! '.
i I ! "..', ...\
. ~orel~2!c[s ana~B~Besiaolisliriien~ke.useqI6trfr~t.orj~i;e~byrhiStOriclCultural
trav.elers.compa.red.to~56.percent.ofaITtravelers..l\ I ,
. tSlioppingjs.pirt-:Ofrthe.trip.f~~~~~~~t of ni$~i@..c'ii11j~(tmvelerS, 'coIIlP~at[d.!q]:3
psrcent:"of:tiie:tJ:S:trav'~l:P:OHUlatiOn~~tatelnatiOlrlal P~. outdoor activitieS, beaches and
theme parks are also popular with lWftoric/cuitur'iil tra'{elers. \
. Eighteen per-cent Of.historic/cultural/travelers sat they~pend more than $1,000 when they
travcl compared to 12 percent of aliI travelers. !.. \
. Historic/cultural travelers Eli'e twi.~~ as likely to t4ke a gtl~UP. tour than ~e average traveler
(6% V$. 3%) ./ 'I \ \
/. ~ I .
. The South Atlantic and Pacific ,:regiop.s oCtile U.S,! are th~ Il1'Ost popular destination regions
for historic/cultural travelers. with each region l1Q<rountir~g ~ 18 percent of all trips taken by
this group. ! i il .... \
,! . ".,', . \
. Air travel is the prim~ rrto4~ of ~s~ortation ~~r .22 p~~nt~t histone/cultural ttavelers
compared to 18 percent of the U,.S. traveler pop~latl'on.\ i\ \ '.
. The average nwuber ofl}i.g~6 away per trip for'NstOriclC~lttfrai travelers is 4.7 nights
compared to 3.4 nights for fill U.S. travelers. II \ \ '
, I ,.1
. ~daY;ab'o;!!.~.i1in~~);.o1lQ~~~-~rsoQ~ffiP~~~ilieS~:~"p'I~ure)~ludeS ".
@1h~~c~:~~.ty=~"In:~t.~hi~p~:m~ltlf1~el~e'i~:up.~l O~t.fffiiil:r9.,~~ -
tin~wgffOmJ 92.~~iiiilll~n.~n~rnp.s to lJ~.qr,IllnlOWp~.Q!f~I!S 'In'200~1 A ~erson-tTip
eqUals one person on one tnp 50 miles or more, onefway. ~way fron~ home or lncluding an
overnight stay. M .1' . J \ . \
" ,\ ,
/ , ',; J \ \ \'. .
rIA i$ the nartonal. nan-profit organization repriesenting a~'l c'omponehts~/the $584 bilJion travel
industry. TIA ~ mission is to represent the whole of t~e\ (J. s. tr(Eli~1 industry tQ rCUta:Jte and facilitate
increased travel to and within the United Statu.
I I ,! \
\
\
\
\
\
, !
\
\
\
\
. ,
_ 07/26/02
.
10:45
ft1 303'623 1508'
NTHP - MPRO
~002
;
/BERITAGE TOURISM
PROGRA~ \ \
-,..'.
\,1
, \
NATIONAL rrRUST '
r- HJS'I'OllIC ~5EItVA'JiON
\
,
What is eulturaJ beritage tourism? ,',' \
Cultllral heritage tourism means traveling to experieD.ce;the pl~cesand activities that authentically
represent the stories and people orthe past and present. lIt inclu.deS\irreplace~~Je historic, cultural and
natural resources. ,('
\
What beJ'leftts does cultural henta&e tourism offer?i.\ ,,\ ,,\,
Tourism is big business" G"2000....traY.il~d~H?J.!riSl1l$ii@,6jii~ci$58~~3.b.i11iOii'iOtheU:-S..et:Pnomy.~
tTmetaiid:tO\itismist1ie.'"tIijrd.Jargest1et'iil:iir41tst5i:injl~e:.u:S)behind au~omotjve dealers and food .
stores. Travel aDd tourism directly employs more ~ 7i:8 mil~ion people and indirectly supports another
11.S million jobs, creating a total of19 millionjob~/-that's I of every 7 people in the U.S.
(Source: 2001 Tourism Works/or America Re.port,l I '\ ,i
,
'I I
In addition to creating new jobs. new business and high,br prop~I'o/ values, well-managed tourism
improves the quality oflife and builds commt.mi.tY, p#d~,~C"'oTding.to'a6200 rRepOrt"'ofiCllltUrazSa',
'!fiSf!!:!~Tau;i.sm, ~sitorU~Jlis~QriC~~i~j~~~cg=y'lon.g~!lJld",s~~1l10re~~~
Gtlier.~1~ds,of~t9urlst.s.rcc&tural ana.lien~e~Xlslt~~'~PT~';.Q~V;flr~ge,.~63,l.per.,.tg.P_C;::_~B~~J.~ ~~..7J
f~ll_UJ. travelers, and,they_spena.ana.av,erag~LqU. ?~~gIjts l!~a)(:~o~ liome'7'..,~~~ea fjj ,3 .~.Dlgh1S'
for.aU,otlter;tra"y'elers~_(Source: Travel !rjch~trz.~~la!tl,on ~f 1men.:~~l~apsthe:l::l1ggest6enefifs oJ
ciilfiiiil heQ.ta&e"tounsm,~though,.are.4ivers1ficttion onocal etonom,(\s and p!eservatton of.M
C.q~:5.wllque eharacter"J ---z;-n i . \
i \
What challeD&es can cultural beritage tourism brqtg? !\
One challenge is ensuring that tourism does not destroy the very heritage that attracts visitors in the first
place. Furthermore, tourism is a competitive, sophisiic'~ted, fast-changiIlg industry that presents its own
challenges. It is generally a. clean induSrry! no sm~stacks or dangerou~, bhemicals. But it does put
demands on the infrastructure .. on rOads/airport, w,. ater supplies and pubVc services like police and fire
protection. ) , 1\ '
i )\
/ i \
What makes cultural heritllle tourism ~ork? }I
By working in local communities across the country q~{er the past decade, the National Trust has
develQped five principles to create a sUstainable bultuf'Jl he'dtage tourism program in your community,
. ' I I "
regt.OQ or state. !" ,
1) Collaborate / i i
2) Find the fit between a community ElD.d to~rism
3) Make sites and pr~ come alive! i'
4) Focus on quality md authenticity; .!
5) Preserve and protect resources ) /
/ !' ;' ,;'" \ \ .-
What does tbe National Trust's Heritage 'I\ourlsm Program ,do?
The Heritage Tourism Program provides ~hm~aJ! riss~fance in '~tr8:[egic planning, preservation, towism
development, interpretation and m~ketintdon a:t~';;for-Service b~is\ The Heritage Tourism Program has
also developed a series ot"how-to" publijations/a.nd ~gramS trJ help individuals and organizations
developing cultural herita&e tourism PI()p'iiImS,;f \ \ J
I
/
/
\
f ',j I,
i I' \
Pr/otdng the 1",;..lIIuabl,\
, / r, \
, I \
! \
I
!
i
,I