HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 08/03/2004
WAS H I N G TON. U. S. A.
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
321 EAST FIFTH STREET
August 3, 2004
REGULAR MEETING - 6:00 p.m.
FORTANGELES
A. CALL TO ORDER - Regular Meeting (6:00 p.m.)
ROLL CALL -
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -
PUBLIC CEREMONIES, PRESENTATIONS
AND PROCLAMATIONS
B. WORK SESSION
Presentation on sedimentation, water quality,
and dam removal issues. (E1wha Dam removal
project) Dr. Bill Jackson and Dr. Brian Winter
C. LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON TillS OR FUTURE AGENDAS (By Council, Staff or Public) AND
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA (This is the opportunity for members of the
public to speak to the City Council about anything not on the agenda, please keep comments to 5-10 minutes.)
D. FINANCE
1. Procurement of Electrical Transformers 1 Approve Purchase
E. CONSENT AGENDA
1. City Council Minutes of July 20, 2004 3,9 Approve Consent Agenda
Regular Meeting and Special Meeting of July
22,004
2. Expenditure Approval List - July 23,2004, - 11
$660,360.54
3. E1wha Underground Electrical Rebuild, 41
Phase I, Project 02-11
4. 2004 Water Main Improvements, Project No. 43
04-01
5. Solid Waste Rate Study 45
F. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
G. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES A V AILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
August 3, 2004 Port Angeles City Council Meeting
Page - I
H. RESOLUTIONS
1. Petition for vacation of property - STV 03-03
- Port of Port Angeles - Portion of"K" Street.
I. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
1. Request by C1allam Transit System for City
Council representative to attend meeting to
review the composition of the governing body
of the Public Transportation Benefit Areas, as
per RCW 36.57 A, and requested every four
years
2. Preliminary Subdivision - Mountain View
Estates - 2500 Block West 10th Street:
Request for consideration of a 33-unit
subdivision in the RS-9 zone.
3. Preliminary Subdivision - Ludwick - Del
Guzzi Drive: Request for consideration of an
II-unit subdivision in the RS-9 zone.
J. PUBLIC HEARINGS - QUASI-JUDICIAL
(7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter)
K. PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER
1. Development Agreement: Green Crow
Campbell Avenue Subdivision and proposed
Planned Residential Development
47
Pass Resolution
53
Appoint City Council Representative
57
Approve Subdivision Preliminary Plat
97
I
.Approve Subdivision Preliminary Plat
135
Conduct Public Hearing
& Consider Staff Recommendation
L. INFORMATION
1. City Manager's Reports:
· Change Orders, Contracts under $I5K, Bids (Page 177)
2. C1allam County Humane Society Report - June 30, 2004 (page 179)
3. Planning Commission Minutes - Meeting of July 14,2004 (Page 183)
4. Elks Naval Lodge Fire Update (Page 197)
M. EXECUTIVE SESSION (As needed and determined by City Attorney)
N. ADJOURNMENT
G:\CNCLPKT\AGENDAlAug 3'04 age.wpd
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings are set by the City Council in order to meet legal requirements pertaining to matters such as, land use permit applications, proposed
amendments to City land use regulations, zoning changes, annexations. In addition, the City Council may set a public hearing in order to receive
public input prior to making decisions which impact the citizens. Certain matters may be controversial, and the City Council may choose to seek
public opinion through the public hearing process.
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES A V AILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
August 3, 2004 Port Angeles City Council Meeting
Page - 2
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
I.
CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING:
II. ROLL CALL:
Members Present:
Mayor Headrick
Councilmember Braun
Counci1member Erickson
Councilmember Munro
Councilmember Pittis
Counci1member Rogers
Councilmember Williams
Staff Present:
Manager Quinn
Attorney Bloor
Clerk Upton
B. Collins
M. Connelly
G. Cutler
D. McKeen
T. Riepe
y. Ziomkowski
/
~
=+
~
~
~
August 3. 2004
~m2- o.'M.
I
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
('~ll\~~fJ.N -I ~~
Led by:
· FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Attendance Roster
DATE OF MEETING: Aueust 3.2004
LOCATION: City Council Chambers
\, 'Z.. 7
"2
{< -1.
City of Port Angeles
FORTANGELES
Ordinance/Resolution Distribution List
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
City Council Meeting of
Aueust 3. 2004
Ordinance I ~ }g.tJ4
Resolution No. \.
I <n""\I
<LI Ii ilo t..... "AI
q
City Manager
City Attv. (I) t v'"
Planning 1/
City Clerk (2) .:J ~
Deputy Clerk (1) ,- /
Personnel
Cust. Svcs.
Finance
Dir. /Mgr.
Police Dept.
Fire DePt.
Light Dept.
Parks & Rec.
/
MRSC (1) I V'
PDN (Summary) .
Extra Copies
.~":()tJ J ,/
~ F'\A-r ~ v'
I TOTAL I If)
. How Much Sediment In
Storage
. How Dams Will Be
Removed and How
Sediment Will Be Released
. How Much Sediment Will
Be Released
. How Sediments Wash
Downstream
. Anticipated Sediment
"Impacts"
. Monitoring and
Management of
Unanticipated Situations
,
1
Sediment Volumes
17.7 million cubic yards total
2.6 mcy Clay and Silt
1.1 mcy Sand
0.16 mcy Gravel
0.05 mcy Cobble
6.6 mcy Clay and Silt
5.1 mcy Sand
1.8 mcy Gravel
0.2 mcy Cobble
2
lake Mills
3
Lake M ills Delta
· How Glines Canyon
Dam Will Be
Removed and How
Sediment Will Be
Released
4
5
6
7
How Much Sediment Will Be Released From
the Reservoirs
8
9
Suspended and Bedload Transport
10
l.lke AtdWe II Dt"IWdowrlWith Fi$h WirrilowS
100,~
E 10,~
...
!:
c
0
j
c
.
u 1,lXXl
c
0
u
'E
'"
E
'ii
o1l
. 100
c
Ii:
10
61:1171 llfln1 Hi11"1 311m 6'1m 8131/72 111311172 3l2l'13 611113 81311131211113 3o?l74 1lI1"4 911/74
Lake A1dwell Drawdown With Fish Windows
45,000
5,000
40,000
E 35,000
ll.
~
~ 30,000
e
i 25,000
..
c
o
o 20,000
i:
tI
E 15000
11 '
tI
o
! 10,000
ii:
o
61211989 61211990 61211991 61111992 61211993 61211994 612/1995 611/1996 61211997 61211998 61211999 61112000 61212001 6/212002
11
12
Downstream Sediment Impacts
· Significantly increase
turbidity in the River
(3-5 yrs)
· Temporarily impact
the aquatic
environment
· Short-term and long-
term deposition of
sand/gravel on the
river bed
· I ncreased rates of
channel migration or
avulsion
Sediment Monitoring
indicates sediment impacts are significantly greater than
predicted.
13
Sediment Monitoring Categories
14
Restoration Plan, Continued
15
16
National Park Service ;-
Elwha Presentation to the Port
Angeles City Council August 3, 2004
3 Questions (in addition to sediment)
· Why did the National Park Sevice decide
to remove both dams at once--what other
options were considered?
· When do low flows occur?
· How much water do the fish hatcheries
use?
1
National Park Service :.~-
Question 1
Why did the National Park Sevice
decide to remove both dams at
once? What other options were
considered?
2
1
National Park Service ;:
The Elwha River Ecosystem
and Fisheries Restoration Act*
"
... the fllll
~l7e restorat*
r eeo 1011 Of
allad~ systel1J. a the llllJrh
Ol1J.olls fi lld llatj a
lsher. l7e
les "
...
*A negotiated settlement in 1992 that resolved existing and pending
litigation. This was agreed to by all parties: Federal Government,
State Government, City of Port Angeles, Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe,
the owner and operator of the dams, and several conservation
groups.
3
National Park Service ~,.
Dam Removal Options
Considered but Rejected 1996*
. Retain Elwha Dam
- Install Fish Screens & Ladders
- Remove Glines Canyon Dam
. Retain Glines Canyon Dam
- Install Fish Screens & Ladders
- Remove Elwha Dam
. Phased Dam Removal
- Remove Elwha Dam First
- Remove Glines Canyon Dam 10 years later
- *Rejected during the 1994--1996 National Environmental Policy Act review
process which included public comment during the FERC Licensing process,
the Elwha Report, and during two separate Environmental Impact Statements
4
2
National Park Service ;-
OPTION: Retain Elwha Dam
· DISADVANTAGES...
· Still require construction of municipal and
industrial water treatment plants
· Natural coarse sediment transport would fill
remaining reservoir within 40-50 years and
hydropower production would cease
· Fish restoration 83 % less than removal of
both dams
5
National Park Service .~-
OPTION: Retain Glines Canyon Dam
· DISADVANTAGES
· Still require construction of municipal and
industrial water treatment plants
· Fish restoration 84 % less than removal of
both dams
6
3
National Park Service ;=
OPTION: Phased Dam Removal
· DISADVANTAGES
· Still require construction of municipal and
industrial water treatment plants
· Fish would be subjected to two impact periods
· Any restored fish populations would be
impacted with removal of 2nd dam
· Much higher dam removal costs
· Must operate water treatment plants during a
much longer sediment period
7
National Park Service :~-
DECISION: Remove Both Dams at
Once
· ADVANTAGES
· Save Money! Most cost effective method to
fully restore the Elwha River Ecosystem
· Save the Most Fish!
· Only one dam removal impact period
· Maximum Environmental Benefits
· Maximum Economic Benefits
8
4
-
National Park Service ::
Question 2
When do low flows occur on the
Elwha River?
9
National Park Service :'
Extreme Low River Flows by Month
(*90Ofo Exceedance Flows As Estimated at the McDonald Stream Gauge 1950-2002 (in cfs)
January 675
February 743
March 706
April 778
May 1,110
June 1,340
July 816
August 459
September 353
October 321
November 512
December 730
10
5
National Park Service ;>
Question 3
How much water do the fish
hatcheries use?
11
National Park Service .~-
Projected Hatchery Water Use
Surface Water Only (in cfs)
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
WDFW
12.5
22.6
27.8
32.3
44.0
35.5
44.0
44.0
44.0
44.0
10.7
11.7
Tribe
21.3
22.4
24.1
28.0
28.8
9.6
11.4
15.0
16.5
18.2
19.5
20.3
Total
33.8
45.0
51.9
60.3
72.8
45.1
55.4
59.0
60.5
62.2
30.2
32.0
12
6
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
August 3, 2004
CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities I>~
PROCUREMENT OF ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS
Summary: Light Operations Division is in need of pad mounted, single phase distribution
transformers. Quotes for three different sizes of transformers were received and evaluated from
three separate vendors on five different manufacturers. General Pacific Inc. proposed
transformers with the lowest life cycle cost for the 25 KV A and 75 KV A sizes, while Western
States Electric proposed transformers with the lowest life cycle cost for the 50 KV A size of
transformer.
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to sign purchase orders for a total of
$49,462.70 for thirty-five (35) single phase, pad mounted distribution transformers as
follows:
General Pacific Inc. (Howard) Ten (10) 25 KV A Transformers $10,990.10
Ten (10) 75 KV A Transformers $18,003.90
Western States Electric (Cooper Power) Fifteen (15) 50 KV A Transformers $20,468.70
Background/Analysis: The 2004 budget contains funds to purchase new transformers to cover
the cost of maintenance, repair, and new construction for the distribution system. The present
stock of transformers has been depleted due to the number of new developments started since the
beginning of the construction season. Transformers are not available through State bid.
KVA OTY Bidder Manufacturer Unit Cost including Evaluated Life Total
Tax and Freight Cycle Cost Contracted
Cost
25 10 General Howard $1,099.01 $17,750.10 $10,990.10
Pacific
25 10 Western States Cooper Power $1,063.51 $17,915.10 $10,635.10
25 10 Westem States GE $1,165.31 $19,033.10 $11,653.31
25 10 General Pacific Kuhlman $1,287.88 $19,898.80 $12,878.80
25 10 WESCO ABB $1,371.08 $20,310.80 $13,710.80
1
N :\CCOUNCIL \FINAL \ Transformer purchase. doc
August 3, 2004 City Council Meeting
Equipment Purchase: Single Phase Padmount Transformers
Page 2 of 2
KVA OTY Bidder Manufacturer Unit Cost including Evaluated Life Total
Tax and Freight Cycle Cost Contracted
Cost
50 15 Western Cooper Power $1,364.58 $38,078.70 $20,468.70
States
50 15 General Pacific Howard $1,519.84 $39,687.60 $22,797.60
50 15 Westem States GE $1,318.01 $40,080.15 $19,770.15
50 15 General Pacific Kuhlman $1,512.11 $41,161.65 $22,681.65
50 15 WESCO ABB $1,697.06 $41,205.90 $25,455.90
KVA OTY Bidder Manufacturer Unit Cost including Evaluated Life Total
Tax and Freight I Cycle Cost Contracted
I Cost
75 10 General Howard $1,800.39 $34,103.90 $18,003.90
Pacific
75 10 WESCO ABB $1,886.59 $34,665.90 $18,865.90
75 10 Western States Cooper Power $1,780.45 $35,804.50 $17,804.50
75 10 Westem States GE $1,652.66 $37,548.60 $16,536.60
75 10 General Pacific Kuhlman $1,745.16 $37,831.60 $17,451.60
Bids were evaluated based on the KW losses over the expected life of each unit, the Life Cycle
Cost. While the apparent cost of the selected units appears to be higher then some units, the cost
to operate the selected units more then makes up the difference in the initial expenditure.
It is recommended that the purchase be authorized and the City Manager sign purchase orders for
the purchase of 35 transformers as follows:
Western States Electric (Cooper Power)
Ten (10) 25 KV A Transformers
Ten (10) 75 KV A Transformers
Fifteen (15) 50 KV A Transformers
$10,990.10
$18,003.90
$20,468.70
General Pacific Inc. (Howard)
N:\CCOUNCIL \FIN AL\Transformer purchase. doc
2
CALL TO ORDER -
REGULAR MEETING:
ROLL CALL:
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE:
PUBLIC CEREMONIES,
PRESENTATIONS AND
PROCLAMATIONS:
Badge Presentation to New
Police Officer Dan Morse
Proclamation Recognizing
July as Recreation and
Parks Month
WORK SESSION:
LATE ITEMS TO BE
PLACED ON THIS OR
FUTURE AGENDAS:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
July 20, 2004
Mayor Headrick called the regular meeting ofthe Port Angeles City Council to order
at 6:03 p.m.
Members Present:
Mayor Headrick, Councilmembers Braun, Erickson,
Munro, Pittis, Rogers, and Williams.
Members Absent:
None.
Staff Present:
Manager Quinn, Attorney Bloor, Clerk Upton, M.
Connelly, G.l Cutler, D. McKeen, T. Riepe, Y.
Ziomkowski, R. Hoffman, K. Dubuc, D. Morse, T.
Gallagher, T. McCabe, T. Kuch, L. Dunbar, 1. Lierly, and
M. Puntenney.
Public Present:
E. Tuttle, C. Kidd, P. Lamoureux, D. Bickford, and O.
Campbell. All others present in the audience failed to sign
the roster.
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Paul Lamoureux.
1.
Introduction and Badge Presentation to New Police Officer/Law Enforcement
Academy Graduate, Dan Morse:
Mayor Headrick presented new Police Officer Dan Morse with his badge, and Police
Chief Riepe introduced Officer Morse to those present. Mayor Headrick and Chief
Riepe then partnered in reading the Police Officer's Code of Ethics.
2. Proclamation Recognizing July, 2004, as Recreation and Parks Month:
Mayor Headrick read a proclamation declaring July, 2004, as Recreation and Parks
Month. The proclamation was accepted by Parks & Recreation Director Connelly.
None.
Ed Tuttle, 3909 Old Time Place, stated that, since 1991, he and other prominent
individuals have stopped a hotel from being built on the Oak Street property. He felt
that asking hotels to subsidize competition was wrong and, even if Mr. Ehm were to
obtain fmancing, the group would stop the construction of a hotel. Mr. Tuttle
continued that, with a 50% occupancy, great harm would be done to others if an
additional 171 rooms were placed on the market. He surveyed Port Angeles and
Sequim, leaming there are 1068 rooms available on the Peninsula. Mr. Tuttle noted
that Port Angeles is not and will not be a tourist destination unless there is something
unique for the public to see. He indicated he was not opposed to a conference center,
but he would stop a hotel from being built on prime waterfront property. Over 100
businesses have come and gone in a five-year period, and Mr. Tuttle felt it was time to
get creative. He suggested a ~ multi-use conference center, and he described
3 I{)(X)-~
- 1 -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 20, 2004
LATE ITEMS TO BE
PLACED ON THIS OR
FUTURE AGENDAS:
(Cont'd)
FINANCE:
Purchase of Refuse
Collection Truck
CONSENT AGENDA:
CITY COUNCIL
COMMITTEE
REPORTS:
ORDINANCES NOT
REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
Adoption of 2003 State
Building/Fire Codes
Ordinance No. 3165
the type of facility envisioned, suggesting it be tied to an aquarium research center,
grass, picnic tables, rides for children, and also incorporate retail shops with portable
rent. Mr. Tuttle indicated that if anyone was interested in such a proposal, he would
offer his time and expertise to put such a package together.
Paul Lamoureux, 602 Whidby, noted recent publicity that the Amber Alert will be
placed on the internet. Inquiring as to whether the Amber Alert would be made a part
of the Pen Com system, Mr. Lamoureux requested that the public be kept informed on
the matter. Mr. Lamoureux then inquired as to whether public input would be sought
on the matter of the Green Crow Development Agreement, to which Mayor Headrick
responded the Council would be asked this evening to set a date to conduct a public
hearing on that issue. Mr. Lamoureux then addressed the usage of acronyms in City
documents, requesting that the entire name be made available.
1.
Equipment Purchase: Refuse Collection Truck
Public Works & Utilities Director Cutler summarized the purchase of a refuse
collection truck as a replacement of a 1992 vehicle with over 9500 hours of use. He
indicated the purchase had been made a part of the budget. In response to
Councilmember Pittis, Director Cutler indicated the vehicle currently being used would
be traded in as part ofthis transaction. Councilmember Pittis moved to reject bids
from Western Peterbilt for the Peterbilt/McNeilus and PeterbiltlWayne
Curbtender as being non-responsive and award and authorize the City Manager
to sign the contract and purchase order with Western PeterbiltlLabrie, in an
amount not to exceed $190,000.00. The motion was seconded by Councilmember
Braun and carried 6 - 1, with Councilmember Munro voting in opposition.
Councilmember Mumo informed the Council that his opposing vote was a result of his
belief that the private sector should be collecting trash.
Councilmember Pittis referenced the City Council minutes of July 6, 2004, Packet Page
No. 15, last paragraph, wherein the error correction noted in Condition No.5 was
transposed. The actual correction should be from "...an 8-inch water service" to "...an
8-inch water main". Councilmember Rogers moved to accept the Consent Agenda,
to include: I.) City Council Minutes of July 6, 2004, as corrected; 2.) Expenditure
Approval List - July 9, 2004 - $884,024.99; 3.) Electronic Payments - July 9,2004 -
$1,604,793.48; 4.) Wholesale Water Contract with Public Utility District; and 5.)
Household Hazardous Waste Collection Event scheduled for September 24, 2004.
Councilmember Munro seconded the motion, which carried 6 - 0, with
Councilmember Pittis abstaining from the vote on the July 6 minutes due to
absence from the meeting.
None.
1. Adoption of 2003 State Building/Fire Codes:
Fire Chief McKeen advised the Council that the Fire Marshal and the Building
Inspector would be making a presentation on the proposed adoption of the International
Codes, noting that Jim Lierly, Building Inspector had previously worked under the
International Codes the Council would be asked to approve. Additionally, Fire Marshal
Dubuc has taken classes in preparation for the adoption of the Codes.
Aided by PowerPoint slides, Fire Marshal Dubuc reviewed the history ofthe use of the
Model Code, something that was developed by a consensus process for use by many
jurisdictions. The Uniform Code, which became law when enacted at the local level,
has peen used for thirty or forty years. Southern states used standard codes, and eastern
states us~q a differ!t national code, resulting in a tremendous amount of confusion
- 2-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 20, 2004
Adoption of 2003 State
Building/Fire Codes
Ordinance No. 3165
(Cont'd)
nationwide. A great deal of pressure was mounted to establish a code that could be
used nationally, and a council was formed to bring the best of all codes together in the
form of the International Codes. Although the effort took quite some time, it finally
came to fruition and is now being presented to the Council for approval. Mr. Dubuc
informed the Council that all states, with the exception of California, plan to move to
the International Codes as of July, 2004. As part of the 2003 International Codes, the
Building Code, Fire Code, Residential Code, Mechanical Code, and Plumbing Code
are recommended for adoption.
ORDINANCES NOT
REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS:
(Cont'd)
Fire Marshal Dubuc indicated that, for the most part, it would be "business as usual"
for the community, as some chapters have been moved and renumbered, and some
definitions and classifications incorporated changes. He also indicated the City has not
made any amendments beyond those proposed by the State Building Code Council.
The City has been involved in discussions with the community to keep the public
informed as to the changes, and educational seminars have been conducted for
members of the construction industry.'
Chief McKeen then described a proposal to modify the existing fire sprinkler
ordinance, providing a subsidy for fire sprinkler installations in multi- family dwellings
in the form of a $200 rebate per unit for th~ cost of the fire sprinkler installation up to
15 units per building, at a maximum $3,000 rebate per multi-family building.
In the ensuing discussion, Building Inspector Lierly responded to Councilmember
Erickson by indicating the County had already adopted the International Codes.
Councilmember Pittis asked that the Codes be made available at the Library, and
Councilmember Williams felt it should also be made available on the City's web page.
Councilmember Mumo asked for a reaction from the construction community.
Gary Haley, 4923 Happy Valley Road, thanked the City for providing facilities to
conduct the classes on the new Codes. He felt it would take a few months to get a good
handle on the changes, and he has received input from others in the community that
certain aspects of the Codes are more restrictive. However, it is recognized that the
Codes will also provide more uniformity, and he was looking forward to keeping lines
of communication open with the City on any issues or questions that may arise. When
asked by Councilmember Munro if there would be any associated cost increases
because of the new Codes, Mr. Haley indicated there would be an increased need for
engineered projects, thus resulting in increased costs, but he would need more time to
determine the level of increase. He indicated that most changes made had to do with
seismic and structural issues.
Councilmember Pittis suggested the notion of less prescnptIve approaches for
residential construction in the City so that costs for engineering could be reduced. Mr.
Haley indicated he would look forward to discussing such options with the City. After
further brief discussion, Mayor Headrick read the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 3165
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, adopting
the 2003 editions of the International Building, Mechanical, Fire
and Residential Codes, the 2003 Uniform Plumbing Code, the
Washington State Energy Code, the 2003 National Electrical Code
with State amendments and updated appendices as specified and
amending Ordinance 2995 as amended and Chapters 14 and 18
of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
Councilmember Braun moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title.
Councilmember Erickson seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
5
- 3 -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 20, 2004
Adjustment of Industrial
Electric Base Monthly
Charge
Ordinance No. 3166
RESOLUTIONS:
OTHER
CONSIDERA nONS:
Development Agreement -
Green Crow
Solid Waste Export and
Transfer Station Systems
Interlocal Agreements
2. Adjustment of Industrial Electric Base Monthly Charge:
Manager Quinn reviewed the proposed Ordinance to adjust the industrial electrical base
monthly charge, which authorizes an adjustmenHo the base charge currently being paid
only by Nippon Paper Industries. He equated the charge to actually being an
administrative charge, and it is recommended that the charge be waived for the
remainder of the second half of 2004 and placed in an annual review as part of the
budget process. Manager Quinn felt that such a change fits well with the City's efforts
to improve operating efficiencies in support of the community. Councilmember Rogers
added that the matter had been thoroughly reviewed by the Utility Advisory Committee,
who unanimously endorsed passage of the Ordinance.
Councilmember Pittis inquired as to the future process to be implemented for a review
of this waiver, and Manager Quinn indicated it would be reviewed by the Finance
Committee during budget considerations. He agreed the matter could also be reviewed
by the Utility Advisory Committee, which was supported by Councilmember Pittis.
Councilmember Williams inquired as to whether there was any possibility of
preferential treatment because of other rate classes. Attomey Bloor noted State law is
such that customers within the same rate classification must be treated equally, so all
customers who are under the clause related to Industrial Transmission must have the
same administrative charge. If another company were to qualify for that rate, it would
have the same parameters for setting the charge. This would be a requirement of State
law, even if not stated in the Ordinance. Councilmember Williams observed that a new
industry qualifying for the Industrial Transmission rate would then be treated the same
as Nippon, with which Attorney Bloor agreed. Councilmember Pittis followed up with
that commentary and questioned the need for mentioning Nippon in the Ordinance. It
was agreed Nippon need not be included in the Ordinance. Mayor Headrick then read
the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 3166
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, amending
the provisions relating to the basic monthly charge for industrial
transmission and revising Ordinance 3145 and Section 13.12.071 of
the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
Councilmember Braun moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title, with the
deletion of Nippon Paper Industries. Councilmember WilJiams seconded the
motion, and discussion ensued with regard to the impacts on utility taxes paid the City.
A vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
None.
1.
Development Agreement: Green Crow Campbell Avenue Subdivision and
Proposed Planned Residential Development:
Manager Quinn informed the Council that the proposed Development Agreement is
presented for Council consideration. If the Council wishes to proceed with
the proposed agreement, it must set a public hearing for the next Council meeting to
receive public input on the proposal. He indicated staff would be prepared to make a
presentation at that time as well. Following due consideration, the Council agreed by
consensus to conduct a public hearing at its meeting of August 3,2004.
2. Solid Waste Export and Transfer Station Systems Interlocal Agreements:
Director Cutler provided background information on the two interlocal agreements
contained in the packet, one including the City of Sequim and one excluding the City
6
- 4-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 20, 2004
Solid Waste Export and
Transfer Station Systems
Interlocal Agreements
(Cont'd)
of Sequim. The City of Sequim had requested certain changes to the agreement, which
were then negotiated, along with the County, and are reflected in the agreement. The
two agreements are based on whether or not the City of Sequim opts to participate.
Power Resource Manager Dunbar then itemized in detail the differences between the
two agreements, as well as the changes incorporated. Councilmember Braun requested
clarification on Section 1 O.C. having to do with withdrawal. Director Cutler and Power
Manager Dunbar explained that, if the City were to suffer financial damages due to
withdrawal of one of the parties, then the City could opt to invoke a penalty.
The Council was advised that the City of Sequim is scheduled to meet tomorrow to
consider the interlocal agreement. Clallam County approved both agreements at a
meeting earlier in the day and is also awaiting a decision from the City of Sequim.
Director Cutler indicated the City plans to advertise the RFP this coming Sunday, and
the interlocal agreement will be included as part of a good faith effort. Mr. Dunbar
continued with a review of the agreements, noting that any additional parties who may
choose to participate in the agreement at a later date must agree that the regional system
would be their designated solid waste system. That party must also adopt a resolution
agreeing to the disposal district established by the County.
CounciJrnember Williams moved to approve the interlocal agreements and
authorize the Mayor to sign the appropriate interlocal agreement based on the
City of Sequim's decision and, further, that staff be authorized to make minor
non-material changes to the agreement prior to signing, as approved by the
Mayor, if necessary. The motion was seconded by CounciJmember Erickson.
In the ensuing discussion, Councilmember Mumo inquired as to whether the liability
has always been placed on the City, and Director Cutler responded that was the case,
as the City would recover the costs through rates. Councilmember Munro asked if the
City of Sequim were to choose not to participate, but they have waste at the Landfill,
would they still carry some responsibility for that potential liability. Director Cutler
indicated he would need input from the City Attorney in that regard, and Attorney
Bloor responded that Sequim's past disposal of waste at the Landfill would make them
a potential responsible party with a theoretical liability. As a practical matter, that issue
may be difficult to trace. Councilmember Munro then asked if past agreements
addressed the liability factor, and Director Cutler recalled that previous agreements
were for the purpose of rate setting and did not necessarily address liability issues.
Lengthy discussion ensued, and Councilmember Mumo cited the cost of managing the
Landfill, seeking assurances the City has not changed its risk posture from what it is
today. Director Cutler indicated the City's waste stream represents approximately
45%, the County represents about 45%, and Sequim represents about 5 - 10%. Power
Manager Dunbar advised the Council that closure and post-closure funds are fully
funded. Director Cutler pointed out that, with the County signing an agreement for a
twenty-year period, the City would have the ability to set rates to recover, should
something in the liability arena arise.
Councilrnember Pittis provided a historical perspective of the Landfill that included the
days ofbuming waste, moving waste over the side of the bluff, building a liner, and the
like. The City has always been the party that carried the burden ofliability. Attorney
Bloor advised the Council that the City is holding other parties harmless from
ownership and operation of the Landfill, but not from the deposit of materials that
would make the other parties liable under Federal and State law. The City has not
changed liability from past operations. Councilmember Rogers emphasized the fact
that the City is closing the Landfill because of FAA requirements due to the close
proximity of the Landfill to the airport. She added that anyone on the Peninsula who
contributes to the Landfill must share in the liability. After further discussion, a vote
was taken on the motion and carried unanimously.
7
- 5 -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 20, 2004
PUBLIC HEARINGS -
QUASI-JUDICIAL:
PUBLIC HEARINGS -
OTHER:
INFORMATION:
Break
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
RETURN TO OPEN
SESSION:
ADJOURNMENT:
None.
None.
Manager Quinn referenced the update included in the Information Agenda on
Combined Sewer Overflow. Other reports addressed water usage, as well as building
activity. He reminded the Council of the retreat scheduled for Thursday, July 22, at
3 :00 p.m., which he preferred to conduct in the form of a brain-storming session. He
suggested the possibility of the Council revisiting issues discussed at six-week
intervals.
Finance Director Ziomk:owskishared with the Council a recent occurrence of a possible
tragedy being averted by employee Lisa Hainstock's actions to alert oncoming traffic
of a runaway car.
Mayor Headrick introduced Mr. Matt Blanchard of the Makah Tribe, who expressed
interest in solid waste in terms of co-generation on the Tribe's behalf. Councilmember
Pittis suggested that Mr. Blanchard meet with Director Cutler to discuss the possibility
of co-generation in a partnership with the contractor. Manager Quinn agreed that this
possibility could be explored.
Mayor Headrick recessed the meeting for a break at 7 :40 p.m. The meeting reconvened
at 7:55 p.m.
Based on input from Attorney Bloor, Mayor Headrick announced there was need for
an Executive Session with an item subject to Subparagraph (d), RCW 42.30.110, to
review negotiations on a publicly bid contract and Subparagraph (i), RCW 42.30.110,
to discuss with legal counsel representing the agency matters relating to potential
litigation to which the agency is likely to become a party, when public knowledge
regarding the discussion is likely to result in an adverse legal or financial consequence
to the agency. The projected closing time for the Executive Session was 9: 1 0 p.rn. At
approximately 9: 1 0 p.rn., the meeting was extended to 10:00 p.m. by announcement of
the Mayor.
The Executive Session concluded at 10:00 p.m., no action was taken, and the Council
reconvened in regular open session.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Richard A. Headrick, Mayor
Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk
8
- 6 -
CALL TO ORDER:
ATTENDANCE:
AGENDA REVIEW:
COUNCIL/STAFF
DISCUSSION:
City Council Special Meeting
"Brainstorming" Session
Port Angeles, Washington
July 22, 2004
Senior Center, 3:00 p.m.
Mayor Headrick called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. and turned the meeting facilitation
over to Manager Quinn.
Members present: Mayor Headrick, Councilmembers Braun, Erickson, Mumo, Pittis, Rogers,
and Williams
Staff Present: Manager Quinn, Attorney Bloor, Directors Connelly, Cutler, McKeen, Riepe,
Smith, Ziomkowski.
Others Present: Brian Gawley of the Peninsula Daily News
I
Manager Quinn reviewed the proposed agenda wheneby the first couple of hours involved
project interaction with the staff present, then a dinner break, and the remainder of the
meeting till approximately 7 :30 p.rn. would involve only the Council and select management
staff in discussion of specific projects.
Manager Quinn introduced the "Wheel of Progress" which categorized functional areas for
future strategic planning sessions based upon our Council Goals and suggested topics from
A WC and NLC. The categories identified were:
(I) Growth & Expansion, (2) Utilities & Infrastructure, (3) Intergovernmental Relations, (4)
Neighborhood Livability (5) Downtown Enhancement, (6) Municipal Services, (7)
Transportation, and (8) Community & Economic Development. These categories revolved
around the hub of Council policies, projects, vision, and goals.
An additional sub-list of topics under each category was also added, and an example was
used in the category of Transportation. The topic was WalkIBike Improvements with a
project listing of Gateway and "Walkable Communities" as referenced to a consultant
presentation at the A WC Summer Conference by Dan Burden. Attachments on "Walkable
Communities" criteria, a survey instrument, and our 2004 Community W orkplan were
provided for reference.
Review of concepts associated with "Walkable" Communities, Nuisance Enforcement,
Corridor Improvements, and Community Image were discussed. General comments are
summarized as:
Corridor Transportation needs further review. We need to seek a balance between moving
vehicles, encouraging pedestrians and bicyclists, and improving aesthetics. Should we
review the advantages/disadvantages associated with maintaining the one-way couplets on
the entry corridor? What should our strategy look like and function for aesthetics and
maintenance? Pedestrian overpasses downtown were discussed as all-weather ways to move
people; and archways over the road were seen as strategic signage opportunities. Streets cape
and landscape opportunities were discussed along our corridors and a detailed plan was
promised by staff. The impact of signage was also discussed with an emphasis upon
consistent color, logos, etc.
City Council Special Meeting: Brainstorming
July 22, 2004
9
DINNER BREAK:
COUNCIL
DISCUSSION:
ADJOURNMENT:
Policy and planning for creating walkable communities was also discussed. It was noted that
Port Angeles Forward Executive Committee (P AFEC) has incorporated several of these
topics into their overall recommendations. Image and cleanliness of the community are
important objectives. Being pro-active rather than reactive was considered a useful strategy
in dealing with economic development and being able to influence important property
development, like the Rayonier site, for overall community benefit. The application of City
resources was also considered an important asset for shaping our community as we seek a
balance between in-fill and expansion properties for extension of utilities and services.
Involving the community into this strategic planning process to assist the Council in their
vision for the future will be utilized more in the future as we use community surveys, e-
government applications, etc.
Nuisance abatement and improving the community's image was another major topic of
discussion. Staff should research other examples and address the best way to handle such
enforcement issues as private versus public maintenance responsibility of adj acent planting
strips to the curb line, and whether we can deal with aesthetics or concerns on private
property. It was discussed that we consider an incentive approach rather than an ordinance
enforcement approach and rely upon community pride. It was generally the consensus of
opinion that cleaning and improving the community image was important, and that setting
an example with the City's property would be a critical element.
5:15 - 5:45 p.rn.
Based on the above discussion, the following objectives were designated for stafffollowup:
(I) Be more strategic than reactive in planning, and consider more frequent "brainstorming"
sessions devoted to one category or topic; (2) focus on traffic corridors for enhancement with
an emphasis on a Front Street Streetscape Plan, (3) Build and improve upon our Community
Image; (4) Build Community Value through strategic investment in the community
infrastructure and strategic property development and/or purchase; (5) Consider an archway
across Highway 101 coming into the City from the east as a "portal" effect; and (6) develop
a letter to assist new owners of commercial property development that explains our process,
standards, and resources.
Short-term objectives derived are: (I) Revision of the Nuisance Ordinance; (2) Develop a
Code Enforcement proposal for the 2005 Budget Review; and (3) Look into the sign and
portal concept.
The Council also received an update from management staff on the Elwha MOU
negotiations.
7:15 p.rn.
Michael Quinn
City Manager
ATTEST:
Richard A. Headrick
Mayor
Becky J. Upton
City Clerk
City Council Special Meeting: Brainstorming
10 2
July 22, 2004
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04 To: 7/23/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
NIPPON GRA Y, KYLE J-POLE DMG 001-0000-213.10-90 6,059.66
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN REFERENCE MATERIALS 001-0000-237.00-00 -9.76
ASCO PACIFIC SUPPLY CO INC SUPPLIES 001-0000-237.00-00 -22.58
BROOKE & ASSOC INC, ROBERT Top Hinge Assembly 001-0000-237.00-00 -1.81
CDW GOVERNMENT INC Upgrade WP Office 001-0000-237.00-00 -43.16
EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC Cold packs 001-0000-237.00-00 -4.96
FIRST IN PRODUCTS INC Mic Keeper,c1ips 001-0000-237.00-00 -3.85
GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY Fuses 001-0000-237.00-00 -10.22
INTELLlCEPT EPOXY BASED FORMULAS 001-0000-237.00-00 -29.48
JPMORGANCHASE Software 001-0000-237.00-00 -6.98
Books 001-0000-237.00-00 -4.98
Subscription 001-0000-237.00-00 -1.66
KELCO SUPPLY CO SUPPLIES 001-0000-237.00-00 -11.10
Elisa Honeycutt VB DEP RFD 7/3/04 001-0000-239.10-00 90.00
Michael Smithson VB 3/21/04 DEP RFD 001-0000-239.10-00 150.00
Sue Lynch CH 6/18/04 DEP RFD 001-0000-239.10-00 50.00
Wendy Boyd CH 7/4/04 DEP RFD 001-0000-239.10-00 50.00
NEPM (AMDA ENTERPRISES) Jr Fire hats 001-0000-237.00-00 -15.98
WA STATE PATROL - WASIS Criminal history-Tombs 001-0000-229.50-00 24.00
Criminal history-Blank 001-0000-229.50-00 24.00
Criminal history-Pettis 001-0000-229.50-00 24.00
Division Total: $6,305.14
Department Total: $6,305.14
ALBERTSONS INC Credit Council cookies 001-1160-511.31-01 -5.94
JPMORGANCHASE Travel expense-Headrick 001-1160-511.43-10 477.24
Travel expense-Rogers 001-1160-511.43-10 476.23
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC LASER POINTR RUBBER BNDS 001-1160-511.31-01 52.58
SAFEWA Y INC ELWHA REFRESHMENTS 001-1160-511.31-01 64.93
COUNCIL REFRESHMENTS 001-1160-511.31-01 20.01
Legislative Mayor & Council Division Total: $1,085.05
Legislative Department Total: $1,085.05
ALBERTSONS INC MEETING SUPPLY 001-1210-513.31-01 3.99
AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY CUPS, TUMBLERS 001-1210-513.31-01 132.84
JOE'S LAWN CARE CITY CLEANUP 001-1210-513.31-01 120.00
JPMORGANCHASE Travel expense-Quinn 001-1210-513.43-10 450.78
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC July contract maintenance 001-1210-513.48-10 32.49
TELECOM LABS INC Maintenance-August 001-1210-513.42-10 31.12
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF Scan chgs-June 001-1210-513.42-10 12.98
City Manager Department City Manager Office Division Total: $784.20
CERTIFIED HEARING INC HEARING TEST 001-1220-516.41-31 25.00
CLlNICARE OF PORT ANGELES INC PREEMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 001-1220-516.41-31 240.00
OL YMPIC MEDICAL CENTER PREEMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 001-1220-516.41-31 147.80
1 1
Page 1
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04 To: 7/23/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
OL YMPIC STATIONERS INC STAPLES,MARKER,ETC 001-1220-516.31-01 6.63
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER Postage ,supplies-Coons 001-1220-516.31-01 15.40
TELECOM LABS INC M aintenance-Aug ust 001-1220-516.42-10 31.12
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF Scan chgs-June 001-1220-516.42-10 25.19
City Manager Department Human Resources Division Total: $491.14
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS City Vendor Lists 001-1230-514.44-10 20.70
TELECOM LABS INC Maintenance-August 001-1230-514.42-10 15.56
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF Scan chgs-June 001-1230-514.42-10 8.17
City Manager Department City Clerk Division Total: $44.43
City Manager Department Department Total: $1,319.77
PENINSULA INTL RELATIONS ASSN PIRA 2004 QTRS 1 AND 2 001-1390-519.49-72 1,000.00
City Manager Dept Community Service Division Total: $1,000.00
City Manager Dept Department Total: $1,000.00
AT&T WIRELESS 07 -02 AIC 502488950 001-2010-514.42-10 15.90
JPMORGANCHASE Books 001-2010-514.31-01 64.98
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-2010-514.31-01 29.00
TELECOM LABS INC Maintenance-August 001-2010-514.42-10 31.12
WASHINGTON (OIS), STATE OF Scan chgs-June 001-2010-514.42-10 10.50
Finance Department Finance Administration Division Total: $151.50
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-2023-514.31-01 3.49
MARKERS/HILlTERS 001-2023-514.31-01 10.45
OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-2023-514.31-01 57.99
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC TONER CARTRIDGES 001-2023-514.31-01 153.78
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS ACCOUNTING MGR AD 001-2023-514.44-10 63.83
SEATTLE TIMES, THE ACCOUNTING MGR AD 001-2023-514.44-10 103.79
TELECOM LABS INC Maintenance-August 001-2023-514.42-10 38.89
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE June Shipping chgs 001-2023-514.42-10 23.52
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF Scan chgs-June 001-2023-514.42-10 6.20
Finance Department Accounting Division Total: $461.94
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO LUMBER FOR CABINETS 001-2025-514.48-10 49.66
AT&T WIRELESS 07 -02 a/c 49548233 001-2025-514.42-10 37.15
OATABAR INCORPORATED CYCLES 16-207/1/04 001-2025-514.41-50 1,170.93
CYCLES 1-5 7/8/04 001-2025-514.41-50 1,591.00
HOME DEPOT SUPPLY INC, THE CABINET LOCKS 001-2025-514.48-10 73.88
KEYRIFFIC KEYS CORP KEYS-HALLWAY CABINETS 001-2025-514.31-01 17.76
OL YMPIC STATIONERS INC MARKERS/HILlTERS 001-2025-514.31-01 10.45
COpy PAPER 001-2025-514.31-01 43.86
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC TONER CARTRIDGES 001-2025-514.31-01 107.21
2 PL Y ADDER ROLLS 001-2025-514.31-01 86.64
PRINTER MAINTENANCE-LH 001-2025-514.48-10 117.14
PACIFIC OFFICE FURNITURE CHAIR MATS-KATHY,RICK 001-2025-514.31-01 43.32
RADIX CORPORATION AUG MAINTENANCE 001-2025-514.48-10 183.59
12
Page 2
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Date: 7/27/04
Vendor
TELECOM LABS INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Finance Department
AMSAN OL YMPIC SUPPLY
DIVERSIFIED RESOURCE CENTER
JPMORGANCHASE
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
XEROX CORPORATION
Finance Department
CDW GOVERNMENT INC
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC
KNUTSON, CRAIG D
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE FURNITURE
TELECOM LABS INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
WEST GROUP
Attorney
CENTURYTEL
CITY OF FORKS
WASPC NORTH SOUND
Attorney
CAMERON, PAMELA
CDW GOVERNMENT INC
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
OL YMPIC STATIONERS INC
WEST GROUP
Attorney
AT&T WIRELESS
DOUG CRONIN
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS
Description
Maintenance-August
Scan chgs-June
Customer Service
COPY PAPER
JUNE MAILROOM SERVICES
Electric comb binder
LASER POINTR RUBBER BNDS
COPY PAPER
3-HOLE PUNCH PAPER
June Shipping chgs
JUNE LEASE QURTL Y COPIES
JUNE LEASE
JUNE LEASE
Reprographics
Finance Department
Upgrade WP Office
JUNE COPY COSTS
Prof svcs-June
Prof svcs-June
Credit invoice
Repair chair
Maintenance-August
Scan chgs-June
Information chgs-June
Attorney Office
Inmate care-June
Inmate Care-June
Inmate Care-June
Electronic monitoring
Jail Contributions
Prof svcs-June
Upgrade WP Office
JUNE COPY COSTS
Credit invoice
COPY PAPER
Information chgs-June
Prosecution
Attorney
07-05 alc 49079080
Rfd Application fees
Ordinance 3162
Rezone 7000 sq ft to CO
13
Account Number
001-2025-514.42-10
001-2025-514.42-10
Division Total:
001-2080-514.31-01
001-2080-514.41-50
001-2080-514.31-01
001-2080-514.31-01
001-2080-514.31-01
001-2080-514.31-01
001-2080-514.42-10
001-2080-514.45-30
001-2080-514.45-30
001-2GaO-514.45-20
I
Division Total:
Department Total:
001-3010-515.31-60
001-3010-515.45-30
001-3010-515.41-50
001-3010-515.43-10
001-3010-515.31-01
001-3010-515.48-10
001-3010-515.42-10
001-3010-515.42-10
001-3010-515.31-01
Division Total:
001-3012-597.50-99
001-3012 -597.50-99
001-3012-597.50-99
001-3012-597.50-99
Division Total:
001-3021-515.41-50
001-3021-515.31-60
001-3021-515.45-30
001-3021-515.31-01
001-3021-515.45-30
001-3021-515.31-01
Division Total:
Department Total:
001-4010-558.42-10
001-4010-345.81-13
001-4010-558.44-10
001-4010-558.44-10
Invoice Amount
93.35
15.14
$3,641.08
484.77
814.00
311 .36
8.56
87.72
368.44
54.00
647.74
2,583.22
140.95
$5,500.76
$9,755.28
225.26
59.22
375.00
92.50
-25.00
76.03
54.45
28.29
106.53
$992.28
900.00
-900.00
900.00
540.00
$1,440.00
1,133.33
337.90
138.17
-25.00
43.86
106.53
$1,734.79
$4,167.07
8.24
600.00
23.40
22.50
Page 3
'SC/> ''''''''''':,;.
.~"<~.~""""'{(
",-__W'~J
F\;t;I
'*-..~
t..::
~ (.:~.,.,,..J<.o'j
Dale: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Vendor
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS...
TELECOM LABS INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Community Developmt Dept
AT&T WIRELESS (DIGITAL)
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
Community Developmt Dept
AT&T WIRELESS
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
GLOBALSTAR USA
JPMORGANCHASE
MARRA PHD, HERBERT A
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
TELECOM LABS INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Police Depattment
AT&T WIRELESS
CHOICEPOINT BUS & GOvr SVCS
NCNIES INC
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
PORT ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
TELECOM LABS INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Police Depattment
GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
JPMORGANCHASE
METROCALL
MIDDLETON AUTO AND TRUCK INC
Description
Zone Green Crow property
Vincent Subdivision
Ludwick Subdivision
Shoreline Development
Install Spray Booths
Rezone Duplex-Normandin
Yard Setback-Duchow
DOT Street Overlay hours
Capital Fund Proj-CCHA
DeBenedette application
Port of PA application
PA Farmers Market
Maintenance-August
Scan chgs-June
Planning
06-28 alc 0033802563
JUNE COpy COSTS
COPY PAPER
Building
Community Developmt Dept
07 -05 alc 49655020
INET July-City Hall
06-16 alc 1.10012928
Subscription
3 Pre-employment tests
Envelopes
July contract maintenance
Maintenance-August
Scan chgs-June
Administration
07-02 alc 49975063
AutoTrack-June
Sex Offender Conf-Lowell
06-27 a/c 312753523
Postage
Maintenance-August
Sean chgs-June
Investigation
Fuses
Registration-Roggenbuck
07-01 ale 298-A25874
Car wash,protectant
14
Account Number
001-4010-558.44-10
001-4010-558.44-10
001-4010-558.44-10
001-4010-558.44-10
001-4010-558.44-10
001-4010-558.44-10
001-4010-558.44-10
001-4010-558.44-10
001-4010-558.44-10
001-4010-558.44-10
001-4010-558.44-10
001-4010-558.44-10
001-4010-558.42-10
001-4010-558.42-10
Division Total:
001-4020-524.42-10
001-4020-524.45-30
001-4020-524.31-01
Division Total:
Depattment Total:
001-5010-521.42-10
001-5010-521.42-12
001-5010-521.42-10
001-5010-521.31-01
001-5010-521.41-50
001-5010-521.31-01
001-5010-521.48-10
001-5010-521.42-10
001-5010-521.42-10
Division Total:
001-5021-521.42-10
001-5021-521.41-50
001-5021-521.43-10
001-5021-521.42-10
001-5021-521.42-10
001-5021-521.42-10
001-5021-521.42-10
Division Total:
001-5022-521.31-01
001-5022 -521.43-10
001-5022-521.42-10
001-5022-521.31-01
Invoice Amount
31.50
54.00
56.70
64.80
64.80
52.20
41.40
49.50
46.80
52.20
63.00
53.10
31.12
30.01
$1,345.27
61.42
170.16
43.86
$275.44
$1,620.71
16.14
172.00
39.91
21.61
1,050.00
156.44
32.49
54.45
48.35
$1,591.39
14.37
45.00
299.00
435.37
26.25
7.78
52.44
$880.21
133.26
115.00
85.80
63.11
Page 4
Vendor
MIDDLETON AUTO AND TRUCK INC...
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PORT ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
RICHMOND 2-WAY RADIO
SAFEWAY INC
SECOND CHANCE BODY ARMOR INC
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Police Department
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PORT ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Police Department
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS
TELECOM LABS INC
WA STATE PATROL
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04 To: 7/23/04
Description Account Number Invoice Amount
Armour all 001-5022-521.31-01 5.08
COPY PAPER 001-5022-521.31-01 175.45
Account book 001-5022-521.31-01 32.89
Binders 001-5022-521.31-01 19.93
Toner cartridges 001-5022-521.31-01 200.36
Toner 001-5022-521.31-01 242.70
Waste to Energy plant 001-5022-521.31-01 11.55
Postage 001-5022-521.42-10 20.62
Sound Bikes 001-5022-521.48-10 23.82
Radar trailer supplies 001-5022-521.49-90 29.61
Speakers 001-5022-521.49-90 44.50
Service call 001-5022-521.31-14 85.36
.4 Remot::: mikes. 001-50~2-521.31-80 523.09
Inv 010504 sales tax 001-5022-521.31-80 87.98
Repair antenna 001-5022-521.48-10 101.96
Service repair 001-5022 -521.48-10 137.78
Troubleshoot call 001-5022-521.48-10 93.13
Film 001-5022-521.49-90 3.78
Film 001-5022-521.49-90 3.83
Film 001-5022-521.49-90 9.29
Invoice copies 001-5022-521.49-90 9.00
Body armor 001-5022-521.31-80 5,666.04
Clothing allowance-SS 001-5022-521.20-80 118.46
Pistol cleaning kit 001-5022-521.31-01 8.52
Keys 001-5022-521.31-01 2.60
Keys 001-5022-521.31-01 2.60
Patrol Division Total: $8,057.10
Board cleaner 001-5026-521.31-01 2.44
Ribbons 001-5026-521.35-01 28.11
Oly Bank Parade fee 001-5026-521.31-01 10.00
Sr Volunteers 55 Alive 001-5026-521.43-10 10.00
Padlock 001-5026-521.35-01 3.11
Reserves & Volunteers Division Total: $53.66
COpy PAPER 001-5029-521.31-01 175.45
COPY PAPER 001-5029-521.31-01 175.46
Toner cartridges 001-5029-521.31-01 61.62
Cartridges 001-5029-521.31-01 95.25
July contract maintenance 001-5029-521.48-10 108.30
July contract maintenance 001-5029-521.48-10 167.97
PAPD Records Specialist 001-5029-521.41-50 76.72
Maintenance-August 001-5029-521.42-10 38.89
Marihuana leaf c1ass-VM 001-5029-521.43-10 147.00
15
Page 5
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04 To: 7/23/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
WASHINGTON (DIS). STATE OF Scan chgs-June 001-5029-521.42-10 10.53
Police Department Records Division Total: $1,057.19
AT&T WIRELESS 06-27 alc 49945710 001-5090-521.42-10 9.31
CLALLAM CNTY HUMANE SOCIETY Contract pmt-June 001-5090-521.41-50 3,855.66
Police Department Animal Control Division Total: $3,864.97
Police Department Department Total: $15,504.52
AT&T WIRELESS 07-02 alc 46898102 001-6010-522.42-10 20.06
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC INET July-Fire Station 001-6010-522.42-12 172.00
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC JUNE COPY COSTS 001-6010-522.45-30 62.05
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC Business cards 001-6010-522.31-01 69.85
Cash receipt books 001-6010-522.31-01 110.25
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC Ball caps 001-6010-522.20-80 43.32
TELECOM LABS INC Maintenance-August 001-6010-522.42-10 38.89
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF Scan chgs-June 001-6010-522.42-10 7.27
WSAFC 2004 Conference-McKeen 001-6010-522.43-10 357.00
Fire Department Administration Division Total: $880.69
CAPTAIN TS T -Shirts, Sweatshirts 001-6020-522.20-80 451.59
FIRST IN PRODUCTS INC Mic Keeper,clips 001-6020-522.20-80 50.20
MIDDLETON AUTO AND TRUCK INC Lamp 001-6020-522.31-01 8.72
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC Folders 001-6020-522.31-01 42.03
RICHMOND 2-WA Y RADIO Charger 001-6020-522.31-14 70.40
SEAWESTERN INC MSA components 001-6020-522.35-01 123.27
MSA components 001-6020-522.35-01 792.54
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC Ball caps 001-6020-522.20-80 552.23
TELECOM LABS INC Maintenance-August 001-6020-522.42-10 23.34
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF Scan chgs-June 001-6020-522.42-10 1.54
Fire Department Fire Supression Division Total: $2,115.86
AT&T WIRELESS 07-02 alc 43736255 001-6021-522.42-10 7.99
METROCALL 07-01 alc 298-A25896 001-6021-522.42-10 16.29
Fire Department Fire Volunteers Division Total: $24.28
AT&T WIRELESS 07-02 alc 47951801 001-6025-526.42-10 31.68
CAPTAIN rs T -Shirts,Sweatshirts 001-6025-526.20-80 347.12
CORDERY,SHARON Teach CPR 07-08 001-6025-526.31-08 50.00
EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC First Aid Supplies 001-6025-526.31-01 50.51
Cold packs 001-6025-526.31-01 64.63
GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS Biomed equipment-July 001-6025-526.41-50 54.15
OLYMPIC MEDICAL CENTER First Aid supplies 001-6025-526.31-13 14.10
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC Clip board 001-6025-526.31-01 31.39
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE Oxygen 001-6025-526.31-01 122.31
Oxygen 001-6025-526.31-01 13.42
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC Ball caps 001-6025-526.20-80 346.34
Video tape 001-6025-526.31-01 2.46
16
Page 6
Vendor
TELECOM LABS INC
Fire Department
AT&T WIRELESS
NEPM (AMDA ENTERPRISES)
NFPA
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
TELECOM LABS INC
Fire Department
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Fire Department
KNIGHT FIRE PROTECTION INC
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Fire Department
GLOBALSTAR USA
Fire Department
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN
AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY
APWA
AT&T WIRELESS
DIGITAL COpy SERVICES INC
JPMORGANCHASE
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER
QWEST
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
TELECOM LABS INC
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04 To: 7/23/04
Description Account Number Invoice Amount
Maintenance-August 001-6025-526.42-10 7.78
Medic I Division Total: $1,135.89
07-02 alc 45598455 001-6030-522.42-10 29.73
Jr Fire hats 001-6030-522.31-01 208.48
Membership dues-McKeen 001-6030-522.49-01 135.00
Sail caps 001-6030-522.20-80 21.66
Maintenance-August 001-6030-522.42-10 7.78
Fire Prevention Division Total: $402.65
Sail caps 001-6040-522.20-80 86.64
Fire Training . Division Total: $86.64
Test sprinkler system 001-6050-522.48-10 157.04
Hardware 001-6050-522.48-10 4.10
Cord reel,extension 001-6050-522.48-10 40.01
Light bulbs 001-6056-522.48-10 14.60
Facilities Maintenance Division Total: $215.75
06-16 alc 1.10012919 001-6060-525.42 -10 39.91
Emergency Management Division Total: $39.91
Fire Department Department Total: $4,901.67
REFERENCE MATERIALS 001-7010-532.31-01 127.36
COPY PAPER 001-7010-532.31-01 69.53
CEU REGISTRATION 001-7010-532.43-10 5.00
07-02 alc 43263680 001-7010-532.42-10 11.63
JUNE COPY COSTS 001-7010-532.45-30 19.63
Electric comb binder 001-7010-532.31-01 311.35
Calculator 001-7010-532.35-01 54.52
OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-7010-532.31-01 77.23
Folders 001-7010-532.31-01 7.03
Copy paper 001-7010-532.31-01 438.62
Folders 001-7010-532.31-01 21.13
Office supplies 001-7010-532.31-01 119.19
COPY PAPER 001-7010-532.31-01 43.86
Labels,batteries 001-7010-532.31-01 33.76
Copies 001-7010-532.49-90 14.95
TIP and CFP Projects 001-7010-532.44-10 22.50
WATER RATE ORDINANCE 001-7010-532.44-10 22.50
Photos-Hebner 001-7010-532.31-01 42.41
07-05 alc 3604520140945S 001-7010-532.42-10 40.96
Batteries 001-7010-532.31-01 7.92
Maintenance-August 001-7010-532.42-10 217.78
June locates 001-7010-532.41-50 46.74
07 -06 alc 26470706000001 001-7010-532.42-10 36.51
Scan chgs-June 001-7010-532.42-10 150.78
17
Page 7
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Vendor
XEROX CORPORATION
Public Works-Gen Fnd
AT&T WIRELESS (DIGITAL)
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
JPMORGANCHASE
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER
TELECOM LABS INC
WASHINGTO"J (DIS), STATE OF
Parks & Recreation
TELECOM LABS INC
WASHINGTON (OIS), STATE OF
Parks & Recreation
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC
QWEST
TELECOM LABS INC
WASHINGTON (OIS), STATE OF
Parks & Recreation
AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
KEYRIFFIC KEYS CORP
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
TELECOM LABS INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Parks & Recreation
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
ASCO PACIFIC SUPPLY CO INC
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
OEX MEOlA WEST LLC
JPMORGANCHASE
Description
JUNE LEASE
Administration
Public Works-Gen Fnd
06-28 ale 0038436241
INET July-Fine Arts Ctr
Business meals
Ganz fax
COPY PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL
Frames-Bilsborrow
Maintenance-August
Scan chgs-June
Administration
Maintenance-August
Scan chgs-June
Recreation
INET July-Senior Center
JUNE COpy COSTS
07-02 ale 3604171942413B
07-05 ale 3604524285819B
Maintenance-August
Scan chgs-June
Senior Center
DOOR LOCK AND KEY
INET July-Wm Shore Pool
Coil wrist bands,keys
REGISTER REPAIR
FOR SHUT DOWN
SHUTDOWN
ROADSIDE,GRNDS,REC, PARK
ROADSIDE,GRNDS,REC, PARK
ROADSIDE,GRNDS,REC, PARK
ROADSIDE,GRNDS,REC, PARK
ROADSIDE,GRNDS,REC, PARK
Maintenance-August
Scan chgs-June
William Shore Pool
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES
INET July-Cemetery Office
DIRECTORY ADVERTISING-JUL
Phone line repairs
18
Account NUmber
001-7010-532.45-30
Division Total:
Department Total:
001-8010-574.42-10
001-8010-574.42-12
001-8010-574.31-01
001-8010-574.42-10
001-8010-574.31-01
001-8010-574.31-01
001-8010-574.31-01
001-8010-574.42-10
001-8010-574.42-10
Division Total:
001-8011-574.42-10
001-8011-574.42-10
Division Total:
001-8012-555.42-12
001-8012-555.45-30
001-8012-555.42-10
001-8012-555.42-10
001-8012-555.42-10
001-8012-555.42-10
Division Total:
001-8020-576.31-20
001-8020-576.42-12
001-8020-576.31-20
001-8020-576.48-10
001-8020-576.31-06
001-8020-576.31-20
001-8020-576.31-20
001-8020-576.31-20
001-8020-576.31-20
001-8020-576.31-20
001-8020-576.31-20
001-8020-576.42-10
001-8020-576.42-10
Division Total:
001-8050-536.31-20
001-8050-536.34-01
001-8050-536.42 -12
001-8050-536.44-10
001-8050-536.31-60
Invoice Amount
1,201.34
$3,144.23
$3,144.23
41.45
172.00
20.80
19.86
43.86
64.67
25.80
23.34
15~72
$427.50
15.56
10.60
$26.16
172.00
119.40
41.89
35.32
23.34
0.10
$392.05
43.30
172.00
162.88
37.91
74.92
85.69
58.97
16.43
13.21
43.08
38.77
7.78
1.33
$756.27
489.52
294.60
172.00
71.10
52.74
Page 8
€'.ha..~iC..'...."."J1'-.(.<,...
'-..~
~m_
.-~- ~....
._.. ~,'
<Ir.f.;-..,ti-'J-.;.:.l)-
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Date: 7/27/04
Vendor
KELCO SUPPLY co
JOY K DYBECK
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE
TELECOM LABS INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Parks & Recreation
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
AT&T WIRELESS
BAXTER AUTO PARTS #15
BILL'S PLUMBING & HEATING INC
BLAKE SAND & GRAVEL INC
BROOKE & ASSOC INC, ROBERT
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
o & K RENTALS
GRAINGER
GROSS'S NURSERY & FLORIST
HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC
Description Account Number
SUPPLIES 001-8050-536.34-01
Buy back L 3,Blk 13, K 001-8050-343.60-12
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-8050-536.44-10
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8050-536.31-20
Maintenance-August 001-8050-536.42-10
Scan chgs-June 001-8050-536.42-10
Ocean View Cemetery Division Total:
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20
BUILDER'S SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
LUMBER& RELATE!) PRODUCTS 001-80~0-576.31-20
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20
PRODUCTION&MANUFACTURING 001-8080-576.31-20
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF001-8080-576.31-20
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 001-8080-576.31-40
07-02 A/C 44704773 001-8080-576.42-10
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8080-576.31-20
BUILDING, FABRICATED 001-8080-576.41-50
BUILDING, FABRICATED 001-8080-576.48-10
BRICKS & CLAY PRODUCTS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
MET ALS,BARS,PLATES,RODS 001-8080-576.31-20
BUILDER'S SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20
ROAD/HWY MAT NONASPHALTIC 001-8080-576.31-40
ROAD/HWY MAT NONASPHALTIC 001-8080-576.31-40
Top Hinge Assembly 001-8080-576.31-20
INET July-VBCC 001-8080-576.42-12
INET July-Park Facilities 001-8080-576.42-12
INET July-Carnegie 001-8080-576.42-12
RENTAULEASE EQUIPMENT 001-8080-576.45-30
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 001-8080-576.31-20
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 001-8080-576.31-20
NURSERY STOCK & SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-40
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
19
Invoice Amount
144.79
637.00
127.30
19.57
7.78
24.90
$2,041.30
16.85
34.48
9.53
1.94
13.48
36.29
11.98
16.34
132.04
20.45
21.42
40.07
13.95
17.32
10.01
22.46
75.00
50.00
49.22
14.61
8.23
57.29
27.08
67.69
23.57
172.00
172.00
172.00
143.50
92.96
185.92
154.39
58.42
21.88
14.36
Page 9
~
~W11
~. , ,;..
('~" ' ,.......
<....-f.:~.l:r-J'J.-y
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Date: 7/27/04
Vendor
HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC...
INTELLlCEPT
JPMORGANCHASE
LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY
MIDDLETON AUTO AND TRUCK INC
NORTHWEST FENCE CO
OL YMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC NETTING PRODUCTS INC
PARKER PAINT MFG CO INC
PORT ANGELES POWER EQUIPMENT
R & R PRODUCTS COMPANY
SCHMITT'S SHEET METAL INC
SHOlWELL CORP, JONATHAN
STANLEY ACCESS TECH
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Description Account NUmber
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
EPOXY BASED FORMULAS 001-8080-576.31-20
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF001-8080-576.31-20
Software 001-8080-576.31-60
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
FENCING 001-8080-576.31-20
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-8080-576.31-01
PARK,PLA YGROUND,REC EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8080-576.31-20
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20
MET ALS,BARS,PLATES,RODS 001-8080-576.31-20
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 001-8080-576.31-20
ROAD/HWY MAT NONASPHALTIC 001-8080-576.31-40
SEED,SOD,SOIL&INOCULANT 001-8080-576.31-40
SEED,SOD,SOIL&INOCULANT 001-8080-576.31-40
BUILDER'S SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 001-8080-576.31-20
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-576.31-20
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-576.31-20
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 001-8080-576.31-20
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20
PAINTS,COATINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8080-576.31-20
CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-8080-576.31-20
PAINTS,COATINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8080-576.31-20
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8080-576.31-20
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
20
Invoice Amount
23.45
348.28
36.36
90.98
425.80
18.05
11.46
402.88
34.32
2,098.15
67.64
64.92
51.95
1,232.14
226.35
64.98
21.66
447.19
21.66
1,160.11
63.32
-19.00
19.87
19.48
4.20
21.54
88.85
30.67
12.94
8.60
18.47
77.97
8.31
54.90
-23.58
27.94
31.06
3.97
9.61
14.01
45.25
7.62
Page 10
tr.~~.<. V",,
,>-
or ".,:,:.:~?j..i;
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Date: 7/27/04
Vendor
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC...
TELECOM LABS INC
THURMAN SUPPLY
UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC
WASHINGTON (DIS). STATE OF
Parks & Recreation
PENINSULA COLLEGE
Parks & Recreation
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
BUILDERS HARDWARE & SUPPLY CO
FEDERAL FIRESAFETY INC
HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC
MATHEWS GLASS CO INC
MIDDLETON AUTO AND TRUCK INC
OL YMPIC LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANERS
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER
QWEST
SOUND RESTAURANT SUPPLY INC
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Parks & Rec-Maintenance
PORT ANGELES CHAMBER OF COMM
Description Account Number
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-20
CLOTHING & APPAREL 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-40
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF001-8080-576.31-40
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-594.63-10
Maintenance-August 001-:S080-576.42-10
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-594.63-10
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8080-594.63-10
RENTAULEASE EQUIPMENT 001-80~0-576.45-30
RENTAULEASE EQUIPMENT 001-8080-576.45-30
Scan chgs-June 001-8080-576.42-10
Park Facilities Division Total:
JULY MARINE LAB CONTRACT 001-8090-576.41-50
Marine Life Center
Parks & Recreation
Division Total:
Department Total:
Invoice Amount
6.47
15.82
276.12
15.82
2.35
16.10
7.08
21.05
12.23
7.78
8.26
13.71
2,774.36
2,774.36
1.63
$15,306.20
9,000.00
$9,000.00
$27,949.48
10.52
64.98
40.72
3,184.02
23.98
140.91
147.47
13.87
44.70
19.22
15.60
47.71
28.45
218.77
38.32
8.87
28.11
3.91
4.84
$4,084.97
$4,084.97
$80,837.89
15,107.92
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8130-518.31-20
BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 001-8130-518.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8130-518.31-20
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE,REC 001-8130-518.48-10
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 001-8130-518.31-20
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,TRA 001-8130-518.48-10
PRODUCTION&MANUFACTURING 001-8130-518.31-20
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8130-518.31-20
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 001-8130-518.31-20
LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 001-8130-518.31-20
Keys-Breitbach 001-8130-518.31-01
06-20 Ale 206T813953623B 001-8130-518.42-10
07-02 AlC 3604170786905B 001-8130-518.42-10
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8130-518.31-20
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF001-8130-518.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8130-518.31-20
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8130-518.31-20
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8130-518.31-20
PIPE FITTINGS 001-8130-518.31-20
Custodial/Janitorial Svcs Division Total:
Parks & Rec-Maintenance Department Total:
General Fund Fund Total:
2004 MKTG CONTRACT 101-1430-557.50-83
21
Page 11
'''.:.;:-~'~.;'.': '':'''.oi~\.;..{{,...
F.~............~
~....... ..~
.t~,,-;
'.., , ,-'
,~ f":';:i;..,.~.,.~'i
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Date: 7/27/04
Vendor
Convention Center
ALL WEATHER HEATING & COOLING
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
BAXTER AUTO PARTS #15
BLAKE SAND & GRAVEL INC
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC
LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC
MIDDLETON AUTO AND TRUCK INC
MICHAEL PUNTENNEY
NATIONAL SAFETY INC
OLYMPIC LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANERS
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PACIFIC OFFICE FURNITURE
PARKER PAINT MFG CO INC
PORT ANGELES POWER EQUIPMENT
PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY
RADIOS HACK
SANDERSON SAFETY SUPPLY CO
SHOTWELL CORP, JONATHAN
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE
Description
Convention Center
Convention Center
Convention Center Fund
Account Number
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
Invoice Amount
$15,107.92
$15,107.92
$15,107.92
58.48
14.06
6.06
8.66
5.84
8.76
30.91
7.94
23.32
323.55
25.45
184.11
333.56
15.70
172.00
4.69
23.38
1,729.71
220.58
5.73
31.25
74.52
25.02
17.45
116.77
56.07
62.26
54.15
246.92
11.51
32.44
19.39
19.08
17.33
27.27
144.47
216.60
3.24
1.07
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 102-7230-542.31-01
ABRASIVES 102-7230-542.31-20
SUPPLIES 102-7230-542.31-20
SUPPLIES 102-7230-542.31-20
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF102-7230-542.31-20
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 102-7230-542.31-20
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 102-7230-542.31-20
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 102-7230-542.31-25
CLOTHING ACCESSORIES(SEE 102-7230-542.31-20
CONCRETE & METAL CULVERTS 102-7230-542.31-20
BUILDER'S SUPPLIES 102-7230-542.31-20
CONCRETE & METAL CULVERTS 102-7230-542.31-20
CONCRETE & METAL CULVERTS 102-7230-542.31-20
CONCRETE & METAL CULVERTS 102-7230-542.31-20
INET July-Corp Yard 102-7230-542.42-12
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.31-20
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF 102-7230-542.31-25
ROAD/HWY MATERIALS ASPHLT 102-7230-542.31-20
ROAD/HWY MATERIALS ASPHLT 102-7230-542.31-20
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 102-7230-542.31-25
Reimburse mileage 102-7230-542.43-10
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 102-7230-542.31-20
LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 102-7230-542.31-20
PAPER (OFFICE,PRINT SHOP) 102-7230-542.31-01
SUPPLIES 102-7230-542.31-01
SUPPLIES 102-7230-542.31-01
SUPPLIES 102-7230-542.31-01
COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC. 102-7230-542.31-20
FURNITURE, OFFICE 102-7230-542.31-01
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 102-7230-542.31-25
ABRASIVES 102-7230-542.31-20
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 102-7230-542.31-20
07-14 Golf Course Rd 102-7230-542.47-10
07-14 SR101 & Euclid Ave 102-7230-542.47-10
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION 102-7230-542.42-10
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 102-7230-542.31-20
ROAD/HWY MAT NONASPHALTIC 102-7230-542.31-20
SUPPLIES 102-7230-542.31-20
SUPPLIES 102-7230-542.31-25
22
Page 12
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Vendor
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE...
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
TELECOM LABS INC
THURMAN SUPPLY
VERIZON WIRELESS
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC
Public Works-Street
CLALLAM CNTY ECONOMIC DEV CNCL
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER
PORT ANGELES DOWNTOWN ASSN
TELECOM LABS INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Economic Development
AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY
CENTURYTEL
JPMORGANCHASE
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS
PORT ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
QWEST
RICHMOND 2-WAY RADIO
TELECOM LABS INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Pencom
Description Account Number Invoice Amount
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 102-7230-542.31-25 4.55
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION 102-7230-542.31-20 7.01
BRUSHES (NOT CLASSIFIED) 102-7230-542.31-20 21.63
LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 102-7230-542.31-20 18.27
FARE COLLECTION EQUIP&SUP 102-7230-542.31-25 18.38
RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION 102-7230-542.42-10 89.57
Maintenance-August 102-7230-542.42-10 23.34
CONCRETE & METAL CULVERTS 102-7230-542.31-20 12.88
CONCRETE & METAL CULVERTS 102-7230-542.31-20 14.83
07-06 ale 26470706000002 102-7230-542.42-10 13.09
Scan chgs-June 102-7230-542.42-10 2.22
MARKERS, PLAQUES,SIGNS 102-7230-542.31-25 830.56
Street DiYision Total: $5,435.63
Public Works-Street Department Total: $5,435.63
Street Fund Fund Total: $5,435.63
Aquaculture Study-final 103-1511-558.41-50 11,250.00
Business meals-Smith 103-1511-558.43-10 39.05
Contract pmt 1 st Qtr 103-1511-558.41-50 4,375.00
Contract pmt 2nd Qtr 103-1511-558.41-50 4,375.00
Maintenance-August 103-1511-558.42-10 7.78
Scan chgs-June 103-1511-558.42-10 7.06
Economic Development Division Total: $20,053.89
Economic Development Department Total: $20,053.89
Economic Development Fund Total: $20,053.89
COMPUTER PAPER 107-5160-528.31-01 259.70
07-06 ale 300509854 107-5160-528.42-11 75.67
07-06 ale 300496579 107-5160-528.42-11 255.49
07-06 alc 300539444 107-5160-528.42-11 83.86
Travel expense-Riggins 107-5160-528.43-10 260.56
COpy PAPER 107 -5160-528.31-01 87.73
COPY PAPER 107 -5160-528.31-01 87.72
Toner 107-5160-528.31-01 140.79
Toner 107 -5160-528.31-01 79.06
Communications job ad 107-5160-528.41-50 87.61
Console bolts 107 -5160-528.48-10 5.85
07 -02 alc 360Z02038030 1 B 107-5160-528.42-11 7,183.04
Service call 107 -5160-528.48-10 162.45
Maintenance-August 107 -5160-528.42-10 132.24
Scan ehgs-June 107 -5160-528.42-10 33.64
Pencom Division Total: $8,935.41
Pencom Department Total: $8,935.41
Pe'2~ Fund Fund Total: $8,935.41
Page 13
_ (l,.15_lJ <\\,;.,
.,~
~\
\~.- ..",~
,,~,1
. "f;:..~.1_~;-S-';'
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Vendor
ABRAMS, GARY
ABREU, JOHN
CHAPMAN JR, HOWARD E
MCCALL, KEVIN J
Dorothy VanRossen
Karol Gray
Matt Beirne
Peggy Rice
Susan Heyer
LAUREL CRIPE
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
ROONEY. RANDY L
SALMON, LAWRENCE D
SWANSON, DAN
Recreation Activities
AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY
JPMORGANCHASE
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Recreation Activities
ALBERTSONS INC
Brian Coburn
Christine Brown
Darcy Steffen
Dorie Helgeson
Heidi Edgmon
John Henry
Julie Reandeau
Julie Throop
Marty Caldwell
Mary Dawson
Patrick Downie
Stephine Merrill
OLYMPIC SKATE CENTER
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Description
Umpire Adult Softball
Umpire Adult Softball
Umpire Adult Softball
Umpire Adult Softball
TENNIS RFD
TENNIS OVRPMT RFD
SKYHAWK CMP RFD
SKYHAWK CMP RFD
SKYHAWK CMP RFD
Account Number
174-8221-574.41-50
174-8221-574.41-50
174-8221-574.41-50
174-8221-574.41-50
174-8221-347.60-21
174-8221-347.60-21
174-8221-347.60-20
174-8221-347.60-20
174-8221-347.60-20
174-8221-574.31-01
174-8221-574.31-01
174-8221-574.31-01
174-8221-574.41-50
174-8221-574.41-50
174-8221-574.41-50
Invoice Amount
40.00
180.00
120.00
100.00
20.00
20.00
70.40
95.00
95.00
55.32
43.86
135.75
320.00
260.00
140.00
$1,695.33
20.85
-116.75
43.86
216.25
$164.21
39.06
10.33
8.91
36.77
4.38
4.65
17.50
8.50
9.50
20.00
7.00
17.50
17.50
105.00
2.00
25.00
17.50
8.50
87.00
31.90
2.97
Reimb tennis equipment
COpy PAPER
Toner
Umpire Adult Softball
Umpire Adult Softball
Umpire Adult Softball
Sports Programs
COpy PAPER
Division Total:
174-8222-574.31-01
174-8222-574.31-01
174-8222-574.31-01
174-8222-574.31-01
Special Events Division Total:
FOODS: STAPLE GROCERY 174-8224-574.31-01
Refreshments 174-8224-574.31-01
Buns 174-8224-574.31-01
Pineapple,corn starch 174-8224-574.31-01
Refreshments 174-8224-574.31-01
SUPPLIES 174-8224-574.31-01
RFD DAY TRIP 174-8224-347.60-20
RFD AFTER SCHOOL PRG 174-8224-347.60-20
RFD AFTER SCHOOL PRG 174-8224-347.60-20
REC EXP#2 RFD 174-8224-347.60-20
RFD AFTER SCHOOL PRG 174-8224-347.60-20
RFD AFTER SCHOOL PRG 174-8224-347.60-20
RFD CANCELLED DAY TRIP 174-8224-347.60-20
RFD AFTER SCHOOL PRG 174-8224-347.60-20
RFD AFTER SCHOOL PRG 174-8224-347.60-20
RFD CANCELLED DAYCAMP 174-8224-347.60-20
RFD FOR CANCELLED DAYCAMP 174-8224-347.60-20
RFD AFTER SCHOOL PRG 174-8224-347.60-20
SKATE RENTAL 174-8224-574.31-01
Supplies-Whitney 174-8224-574.31-01
SUPPLIES 174-8224-574.31-01
Credit Rainbow Racing
COPY PAPER
Padlock
24
Page 14
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Vendor
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC'H
Recreation Activities
PORT OF PORT ANGELES
Waterfront Trail
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Capital Projects-Pub Wks
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS
Capital Projects-Pub Wks
ARC ARCHITECTS
Capital Proj-Parks & Rec
Debbie Roberts
Capital Proj-Parks & Rec
RICHMOND 2-WA Y RADIO
Capital Projects-Pub Wks
EXEL TECH CONSULTING INC
Capital Projects-Pub Wks
HANSON PIPE & PRODUCTS INC
ANDERSON HOMES
AUSTIN, PETE
BURKEE, THOMAS
CLOUTIER, CHERI C
COLEMAN, ADAM L
DAY, AL YSE
ELLIOTT, MARGARET
FAULKNER, MARIE
GEAREY, DARWIN J
HAYTER, ANNISA
Description Account Number Invoice Amount
BRUSHES (NOT CLASSIFIED) 174-8224-574.31-01 7.38
Youth/Family Programs Division Total: $488.85
Recreation Activities Department Total: $2,348.39
Park & Recreation Fund Fund Total: $2,348.39
ABRASIVES 186-8576-576.31-20 2,525.04
Waterfront Trail Division Total: $2,525.04
Waterfront Trail Department Total: $2,525.04
Waterfront Trail Fund Total: $2,525.04
Desk fan 310-7919-594.35-01 77.41
GF-Pub Wks Projects Division Total: $77.41
Peabody St Reconstruction 310-7930-595.44-10 295.20
GF-Street Projects Division Total: $295.20
Capital Projects-Pub Wks DepJrtment Total: $372.61
PROF SVCS 310-8921-594.41-50 1,458.47
Wm Shore Pool Renovation Division Total: $1,458.47
Capital Proj-parks & Rec Department Total: $1,458.47
Capital Improvement Fund Total: $1,831.08
LOOMIS 3/26 RFD 316-8982-362.40-12 50.00
Lincoln Park Improvmt Division Total: $50.00
Capital Proj-Parks & Rec Department Total: $50.00
Lincoln Park Improvement Fund Total: $50.00
Modify fire alarm 327 -7931-594.49-90 48.73
GF-Carnegie Restoration Division Total: $48.73
Capital Projects-Pub Wks Department Total: $48.73
GF - Carnegie Library Fnd Fund Total: $48.73
Prof svcs-June 328-7950-595.41-50 54,805.74
Prof svcs-June 328-7950-595.41-50 85,674.77
8th St Bridge Reconst Division Total: $140,480.51
Capital Projects-Pub Wks Department Total: $140,480.51
8th St Bridge Reconstr Fund Total: $140,480.51
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-0000-141.40-00 859.52
TEMP SERVICE FEE REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 130.00
BUDGET CREDIT REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 299.77
UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 137.56
UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 107.60
UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 89.97
OVERPAYMENT-3616 MEADOW 401-0000-122.10-99 142.27
DEPOSIT REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 115.00
UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 89.95
BUDGET CREDIT REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 380.08
UB CR REFUND-FINALS 401-0000-122.10-99 69.91
25
Page 15
r"II~:.J;lfi.\.,
.-..~i'/
:-:'/: ~~^*U'\:
i~'
i~' mw;;;;.. _,...;;..;,JI
\'L'p-",~ ____ ___ _ ___ _ _ y
~:;.~~:;.
i !"~'~>1: ~~"..r-')
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Vendor
HICKERSON, MARZETTE
LADIGES, BILL
LBR CONSTRUCTION
MADDOX, TIMMY
NEMES, JENNIFER
NISHIMOTO, MIHO
OBRIEN, KENNETH
PENDERGRASS, PAUL
RICKEL, MARY
SATHER, RON
SIMMONS, PAUL
WHITE, KATHLEEN
WOODWARD, JERYMI
YOUNG, RAMONA
WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC
WESTERN STATES ELECTRIC INC
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Public Works-Electric
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
EES CONSULTING INC
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
Public Works-Electric
AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY
AT&T WIRELESS
BLAKE SAND & GRAVEL INC
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CEO/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST INC
Description
us CR REFUND-FINALS
DEPOSIT REFUND
OVERPAYMENT-1115 E FRONT
UB CR REFUND-FINALS
UB CR REFUND-FINALS
OVRPMT-2309 S FRANCIS #9
DEPOSIT REFUND
BUDGET CREDIT REFUND
BUDGET CREDIT REFUND
DEPOSIT REFUND
US CR REFUND-FINALS
UBGR REFUND-FINALS
US CR REFUND-FINALS
DEPOSIT REFUND
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY
INET July-L T Eng C Hall
SUPPLIES
Account Number
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-122.10-99
401-0000-141.40-00
401-0000-141.40-00
401-0000-141.40-00
Division Total:
Department Total:
401-7111-533.42-12
401-7111-533.41-50
Invoice Amount
10.57
250.00
219.18
111.29
95.93
41.27
250.00
362.61
284.11
250.00
125.00
12.21
64.65
125.00
255.14
3.30
3,476.43
$8,358.32
$8,358.32
282.53
2,417.33
$2,699.86
282.53
282.24
69.03
$633.80
94.97
68.36
-94.97
120.54
71.54
27.85
22.24
9.91
26.72
188.77
9.91
6.61
2,260.24
1,198.88
9.60
55.36
Engineering-Electric Division Total:
INET July-LT Resource Mgt 401-7120-533.42-12
2004 WPAG - June 2004 401-7120-533.49-01
Hearing protectors 401-7120-533.31-01
Power Resource Mgmt Division Total:
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 401-7180-533.31-20
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 401-7180-533.31-20
Credit soap 401-7180-533.31-20
06-27 ale 48531602 401-7180-533.42-10
07 -02 ale 45570652 401-7180-533.42 -10
07-02 ale 44690139 401-7180-533.42-10
07-02 a/c 45528387 401-7180-533.42-10
07-02 ale 44625127 401-7180-533.42-10
07-05 ale 49335938 401-7180-533.42-10
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF401-7180-533.35-01
CONCRETE & METAL CULVERTS 401-7180-533.48-10
CONCRETE & METAL CULVERTS 401-7180-533.48-10
INET July Light Division 401-7180-533.42-12
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10
26
Page 16
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04 To: 7/23/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
CED/CONSOLlDATED ELEC DIST INC... ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 249.09
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC JUNE COPY COSTS 401-7180-533.45-30 18.25
DIVERSIFIED RESOURCE CENTER Janitorial svcs-June 401-7180-533.48-10 96.35
GENERAL PACIFIC INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPL Y 401-7180-533.34-02 375.91
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 167.84
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-03 181 .94
HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF401-7180-533.48-10 24.36
EPOXY BASED FORMULAS 401-7180-533.48-10 10.38
LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 228.78
BLAKE SAND & GRAVEL Rfd Electrical overpmt 401-7180-379.00-00 2,031.07
DAVE IRELAND Reimburse mileage 401-7180-533.43-10 96.84
OLYMPIC LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANERS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 401-7180-533.31-20 25.18
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 401-71~0-533.31-20 25.18
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC FORMS, CONT. COMPUTER 401-7180-533.31-01 365.89
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.31-01 40.88
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.31-01 8.95
COPY PAPER 401-7180-533.31-01 87.72
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.31-01 13.84
PARKER PAINT MFG CO INC Credit caulk 401-7180-533.48-10 -2.71
PENINSULA HEAT INC Flexible Ducting 401-7180-533.48-10 63.70
PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC FARE COLLECTION EQUIP&SUP 401-7180-533.48-10 46.48
PORT ANGELES POWER EQUIPMENT Weedeater head 401-7180-533.48-10 29.23
PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY 07-01 2110 Glass Rd 401-7180-533.33-50 119.42
38% Insulation Analyzer 401-7180-533.45-30 7,238.99
QWEST 07-02 a/c 3604178095336b 401-7180-533.42-10 39.59
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SERVICES PCB Mgt Support J065 2004 401-7180-533.49-01 395.00
ROHLlNGER ENTERPRISES INC FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 401-7180-533.48-10 1,014.04
SANDERSON SAFETY SUPPLY CO CLOTHING & APPAREL 401-7180-533.31-20 326.90
CHEMICAL LAB EQUIP & SUPP 401-7180-533.48-10 178.10
SHOTWELL CORP, JONATHAN Crushed rock 401-7180-533.48-10 162.45
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF401-7180-533.48-10 16.48
ELECTRICAL EQUIP & SUPPLY 401-7180-533.48-10 2.71
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 401-7180-533.48-10 17.51
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 401-7180-533.48-10 37.62
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 401-7180-533.48-10 13.65
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 401-7180-533.48-10 4.87
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.48-10 21.38
TELECOM LABS INC Maintenance-August 401-7180-533.42-10 108.90
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE June Shipping chgs 401-7180-533.42-10 12.39
UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC RENTAULEASE EQUIPMENT 401-7180-533.34-02 1,066.02
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF Scan chgs-June 401-7180-533.42-10 28.35
WASHINGTON FIRE & SAFETY EQUIP FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP/SUP 401-7180-533.31-20 284.83
27
Page 17
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Vendor
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC
Public Works-Electric
QWEST
Description
28" Cones
Electric Operations
07 -02 ale 206Z020411942B
Account N'umber
401-7180-533.31-20
Division Total:
401-7188-594.42-10
401-7188-594.65-10
401-7188-594.65-10
401-7188-594.41-50
401-7188-594.41-50
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
402-0000-237.00-00
402 -0000-237.00-00'
402-0000-141.40-00
Invoice Amount
830.48
$20,181.36
64.98
55,815.57
1,982.08
529.30
103.00
$58,494.93
$82,009.95
$90,368.27
-36.18
-47,04
152.34
$69.12
$69.12
46.56
178.70
178.70
205.86
184.11
19.45
11.69
58.35
58.35
7.56
8,36
472.07
613.74
74.73
356.82
4,254.00
25.85
37.00
225.00
225,00
15.00
38,89
4.51
12.44
67.54
30.53
10.41
SUPERIOR ELECTRIC NORTHWEST INC Contract svcs-Final
Time & material
TRIAXIS ENGINEERING INC
Public Works-Electric
BACKFLOW APPARATUS & VALVE CO
BACKFLOW TEST GAUGE SERVICE
FAMILlAN NORTHWEST INC #3206
AIRPORT GARDEN CENTER
AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY
ANGELES ELECTRIC INC
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
BACKFLOW APPARATUS & VALVE CO
BACKFLOW TEST GAUGE SERVICE
BLAKE SAND & GRAVEL INC
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CLALLAM CNTY DEPT OF HEALTH
DIVERSIFIED RESOURCE CENTER
EDGE ANALYTICAL
FAMILlAN NORTHWEST INC #3206
MIDDLETON AUTO AND TRUCK INC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
Prof svcs pe 06-25
Prof sves pe 06-25
Electric Projects
Public Works-Electric
Electric Utility Fund
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP
SUPPLIES
PIPE FITTINGS
Division Total:
Department Total:
SEED,SOD,SOIL&INOCULANT 402-7380-534.34-02
WATER&SEWER TREATING CHEtoM02-7380-534.31-05
WATER&SEWER TREATING CHEtoM02-7380-534.31-05
PAPER & PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 402-7380-534.31-20
LABOR-ELECTRICIAN 402-7380-534.48-10
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV 402-7380-534.34-02
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 402-7380-534.34-02
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV 402-7380-534.34-02
EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR SERV 402-7380-534.34-02
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 402-7380-534.34-02
SUPPLIES 402-7380-534.34-02
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 402-7380-534.34-02
SUPPLIES 402-7380-534.35-01
SEED,SOD,SOIL&INOCULANT 402-7380-534.34-02
INET July-Water Division 402-7380-534.42-12
COLIFORM SAMPLING 2004 402-7380-534.48-10
Janitorial sves-June 402-7380-534.48-10
TESTING&CALlBRATION SERVI 402-7380-534.48-10
TESTING&CALlBRATION SERVI 402-7380-534.48-10
TESTING&CALlBRATION SERVI 402-7380-534.48-10
TESTING&CALlBRA TION SERVI 402-7380-534.48-10
SUPPLIES 402-7380-534.34-02
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 402-7380-534.31-20
LISTENING DEVICE 402-7380-534.34-02
BELT-INDUSTRIAL 402-7380-534.34-02
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 402-7380-534.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 402-7380-534.31-01
28
Page 18
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Date: 7/27/04
Vendor
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER
PUD #1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY
QWEST
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
TELECOM LABS INC
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR
WASHINGTON (DIS). STATE OF
WHISTLE WORKWEAR
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC
Public Works-Water
JPMORGANCHASE
AMSAN OL YMPIC SUPPLY
ANGELES MILLWORK & LUMBER CO
BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
DIGITAL COPY SERVICES INC
HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC
JPMORGANCHASE
K & L SUPPLY INC
LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP
NURNBERG SCIENTIFIC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER
PORT ANGELES POWER EQUIPMENT
Account Number
402 -7 380-534 .44-10
402-7380-534.31-20
402-7380-534.47 -10
402-7380-534.42-10
402-7380-534.31-20
402-7380-534.31-20
402-7380-534.31-20
402 -7380-534.34-02
402 -7380-534.34-02
402-7380-534.34-02
402-7380-534.34-02
402-7380-534.34-02
402-73~0-534.34-02
402-7380-534.42-10
402-7380-534.42-10
402-7380-534.48-10
402-7380-534.42-10
402-7380-534.31-20
402-7380-534.31-20
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
403-0000-237.00-00
Division Total:
Department Total:
PAPER & PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 403-7480-535.31-20
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 403-7480-535.31-20
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 403-7480-535.31-20
INET July-WW Division 403-7480-535.42-12
JUNE COPY COSTS 403-7480-535.31-01
LUMBER& RELATED PRODUCTS 403-7480-535.31-20
Repair kit 403-7480-535.31-20
SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-20
CLOTHING ACCESSORIES(SEE 403-7480-535.31-20
METALS,BARS,PLATES,RODS 403-7480-535.31-20
METALS,BARS,PLATES,RODS 403-7480-535.48-10
CHEMICAL LAB EQUIP & SUPP 403-7480-535.31-20
CHEMICAL LAB EQUIP & SUPP 403-7480-535.31-20
COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPI403-7480-535.31-01
Supplies-Stem pin 403-7480-535.31-20
Safety Lunch-Young 403-7480-535.43-10
HAND TOOLS ,POW&~~ POWEF403-7480-535.35-01
Description
CITY MGR LETTER RE WATER
Fuel-Edgington
07-13203 Reservoir Rd
07-10 a/c 360Z100240955B
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP.
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLP APER
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLP APER
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS
GASES CONT.EQUIP:LAB,WELD
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER
SUPPLIES
Maintenance-August
June Shipping chgs
June locates
Scan chgs-June
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP.
MARKERS, PLAQUES,SIGNS
Water
Public Works-Water
Water Fund
Repair kit
Invoice Amount
195.00
35.00
27.40
325.68
17.97
5.05
5.83
2.25
4.48
12.66
12.68
28.68
14.88
7.78
3.76
23.38
4.71
89.65
830.48
$9,068.54
$9,068.54
$9,137.66
-2.10
-$2.10
-$2.10
119.50
34.39
106.23
654.18
59.45
50.51
27.35
113.92
383.60
101.28
37.09
1,191.52
-91.32
75.81
38.84
47.93
9.74
Page 19
('/.'.,:U<i.l'__
:::>~~
~.~..ta.~..~.'~.._1F.'..
~-
./':" . - -- ..,..~.
. "f;:\..~..:!'J,:.oj-
Dale: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Vendor
PORT ANGELES POWER EQUIPMENT..
QWEST
R & D SUPPLY INC
SANDY'S RACE STREET AUTO PARTS
SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
TELECOM LABS INC
THURMAN SUPPLY
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
WHISTLE WORKWEAR
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
DIVERSIFIED RESOURCE CENTER
OLYMPIC LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANERS
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PEN PRINT INC
PORT ANGELES CITY TREASURER
RADIO PACIFIC INC
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC
TELECOM LABS INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Description Account Number
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWEF403-7480-535.35-01
07-02 alc 3604170591196B 403-7480-535.42-10
07 -02 a/c 3604170190080B 403-7480-535.42-10
WATER&SEWER TREATING CHEI\M03-7480-535.31-20
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 403-7480-535.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 403-7480-535.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 403-7480-535.31-20
RENTAULEASE EQUIPMENT 403-7480-535.35-01
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 403-7480-535.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 403-7480-535.31-20
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 403-7480-535.31-20
HAND TOQLS ,F',OW&NON POWEF403-7480-535.35-01
PAINTS,COA TINGS,WALLPAPER 403-7480-535.31-20
BAGS,BAGGING,TIES,EROSION 403-7480-535.31-20
CLOTHING & APPAREL 403-7480-535.31-20
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-20
LAB EQUIP,BIO,CHEM,ENVIR 403-7480-535.31-20
AUTO BODIES & ACCESSORIES 403-7480-535.31-20
Maintenance-August 403-7480-535.42-10
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 403-7480-535.31-20
June locates 403-7480-535.41-50
Scan chgs-June 403-7480-535.42-10
FIRST AID & SAFETY EQUIP. 403-7480-535.31-20
Invoice Amount
17.25
37.43
40.61
496.94
104.88
51.27
327.70
476.50
16.31
7.80
2.17
38.42
10.77
10.80
149.71
16.33
180.73
2.35
15.56
71.04
23.38
8.25
15.82
$5,082.04
$5,082.04
$5,079.94
187.00
18.80
28.81
3.84
131.58
59.16
72.02
42.24
31.95
22.25
350.00
25.86
4.70
38.89
11.92
44,192.27
Wastewater
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr
Wastewater Fund
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
INET July-SW Corp Yard 404-7580-537.42-12
Janitorial svcs-June 404-7580-537.48-10
MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCTS 404-7580-537.48-10
SUPPLIES 404-7580-537.31-01
SUPPLIES 404-7580-537.31-01
SUPPLIES 404-7580-537.31-01
COMPUTERS,DP & WORD PROC. 404-7580-537.31-01
COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPI404-7580-537.31-20
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 404-7580-537.44-10
Business meal-McCabe 404-7580-537.43-10
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 404-7580-537.44-10
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 404-7580-537.31-01
PIPE AND TUBING 404-7580-537.35-01
Maintenance-August 404-7580-537.42-10
Scan chgs-June 404-7580-537.42-10
June Recycling 404-7580-537.41-50
30
Page 20
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Date: 7/27/04
Vendor
Public Works-Solid Waste
AMSAN OLYMPIC SUPPLY
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CORNERHOUSERESTAURANT
DEN-REE PRODUCTIONS
DIVERSIFIED RESOURCE CENTER
ECONOMIC & ENGINEERING SVC INC
NORTHWEST BUSINESS FINANCE LLC
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS
QWEST
SANDERSON SAFETY SUPPLY CO
TAYLOR-SPARKS REFRIGERATION INC
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF
Public Works-Solid Waste
Description
Solid Waste-Collections
Public Works-Solid Waste
Solid Waste-Collections
Account Number
Division Total:
Department Total:
Fund Total:
PAPER & PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 405-7585-537.31-20
PLASTICS 405-7585-537.31-20
INET July-SW Landfill 405-7585-537.42-12
SW RFP Luncheon expense 405-7585-537.31-01
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 405-7585-537.44-10
Janitorial svcs-June 405-7585-537.48-10
Prof svcs-April 405-7585-537.41-50
Prof svcs May 2004 405-7585-537.41-50
TIRE RECYCLING 405-7585-537.48-10
OFFICE SUPPLIES 405-75$5-537.31-01
OFFICE SUPPLlES,PAPER/RIB 405-7585-537.31-20
COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPI405-7585-537.48-1 0
Landfill closure 405-7585-537.44-10
LIBRARY SERVICES(EXCL 908 405-7585-537.44-10
07-02 ale 3604522245145B 405-7585-537.42-10
07-02 ale 3604175035758b 405-7585-537.42-10
07-02 a/c 3604525100532B 405-7585-537.42-10
WORK GLOVES 405-7585-537.31-20
FREON REMOVAL 405-7585-537.48-10
COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPH405-7585-537.31-20
Solid Waste-Landfill Division Total:
Public Works-Solid Waste Department Total:
Solid Waste-Landfill Fund Total:
ARISING CONSTRUCTION City rebate-Hankins 421-7121-533.49-86
MATHEWS GLASS CO INC City rebate-Bower 421-7121-533.49-86
APRIL HEILMAN City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86
BRICE GLEN DE City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86
CINDY BUTZ City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86
DARLENE ERSKINE City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86
DONNA MOREAU City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86
GARY GEBHART City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86
IDA BROOKS City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86
JEFF BREITBACH City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86
JOANNE BIRKLAND City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86
JOHN J CHIASSON City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86
JOHN NORTON City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86
JOHN RIGG City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86
KATHIE NICHOLSON City rebate 421-7121-533.49-86
LARRY HERZOG City rebate 31 421-7121-533.49-86
Page 21
Invoice Amount
$45,221.29
$45,221.29
$45,221.29
119.50
144.15
187.00
20.07
250.00
47.00
5,544.88
4,332.90
850.00
26.86
8.56
70.40
302.76
29.15
40.26
80.15
40.07
79.03
1,151.23
578.58
$13,902.55
$13,902.55
$13,902.55
10,601.50
196.00
40.00
50.00
50.00
40.00
50.00
100.00
50.00
100.00
50.00
50.00
40.00
180.00
50.00
40.00
Vendor
PENINSULA DAilY NEWS
Public Works-Solid Waste
HEll ENVIRONMENTAL IND l TD
PETTIT Oil COMPANY
SIOUX AUTOMATION CENTER INC
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SVC
BAXTER AUTO PARTS #15
CAPACITY PROVISIONING INC
CHEVRON USA
DENVER'S TIRE CO INC
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04 To: 7/23/04
Description Account Number Invoice Amount
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: $15,952.16
WasteWater Utility CIP Fund Total: $15,952.16
PA landfill Composting 454-7588-594.44-10 338.40
Solid Waste Coli Projects Division Total: $338.40
Public Works-Solid Waste Department Total: $338.40
Solid Waste Utility CIP Fund Total: $338.40
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-237.00-00 -107.84
Diesel 501-0000-141.20-00 338.74
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-0000-237.00-00 -15.21
Division Total: $215.69
Department Total: $215.69
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 678.54
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 50 1-76jO-548. 34-02 44.10
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 7.40
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 11.90
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 8.73
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 44.36
INET July-Equipment Svcs 501-7630-548.42-12 41.00
GAS PURCHASE 501-7630-548.32-10 20.09
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.31-10 8.66
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 10.83
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2.44
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 37.09
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 3.79
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 7.58
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2.44
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 19.49
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 2.44
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2.44
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 138.27
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 47.11
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 64.98
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 4.61
Vent cover 501-7630-548.34-02 54.10
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2.44
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 8.66
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2.44
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 7.85
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 119.13
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2.44
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 74.46
AUTO & TRUCK MAIN'3!EMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2.44
Page 23
';);~.;~~"j
~-
~.tr' ~~
._n' -".,..
lk ~__"df
->::.. <,
...~
"'"r 1'.:".",.,.;.;..;,.0")
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Vendor
DENVER'S TIRE CO INC...
DIVERSIFIED RESOURCE CENTER
EVERGREEN COLLISION CENTER
HEARTLlNE
HElL ENVIRONMENTAL IND L TD
IBS INCORPORATED
KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES
Description
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERV!CES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
Flat repair
Tire change
Repair labor
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
Janitorial svcs-June
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
34
Account Number
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
Invoice Amount
0.40
4.66
9.75
20.58
28.15
48.74
28.16
40.61
28.15
32.49
20.58
43.32
28.15
7.58
71.47
59.57
64.98
95.30
35.73
7.58
19.49
16.23
15.16
28.15
28.16
28.15
50.90
28.15
176.53
28.15
32.49
16.24
47.00
336.60
1,105.96
251.15
67.09
39.98
1,407.10
240.01
16.74
25.83
Page 24
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Vendor
LARSON GLASS TECHNOLOGY INC
LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER (CITY)
LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP
MCPHERSON EMERG VEH SRVC CTR
MIDDLETON AUTO AND TRUCK INC
Description
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
HOSES, ALL KINDS
HOSES, ALL KINDS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK ACCESSORIES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
35
Account Number
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.31-10
501-7630-548.31-10
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-7630-548.48-10
501-76~0-548.48-1 0
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
Invoice Amount
92.05
48.74
129.36
129.35
86.64
86.64
31.89
51.98
33.57
243.68
12.18
33.10
112.96
13.26
766.39
12.10
29.63
59.69
11.20
3.91
1.18
462.77
33.24
6.20
4.64
31.31
36.21
19.35
16.68
51.92
5.84
4.22
17.25
17.25
12.89
10.98
54.51
10.82
5.35
37.04
50.13
4.72
Page 25
('l.I-~.:.U<\'t..
~~....~..
.....~"'"'. '._' . _ '.__f~.'.
~.~.=~~...."
~-^ Wj
,;,:.. -' '^:::
, ,." {~,':I'." ';..::'".......7
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04
To: 7/23/04
Vendor
MIDDLETON AUTO AND TRUCK INC...
OLYMPIC ARMA COATINGS INC
Description
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
Credit filters
Credit filters
Credit filters
Credit filters
Credit filters
Credit filters
Credit filters
Credit misc parts
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK ACCESSORIES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK ACCESSORIES
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
HOSES, ALL KINDS
HOSES, ALL KINDS
HOSES, ALL KINDS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
HOSES, ALL KINDS
Relay switch
Fuel pump
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS
Filter credit adjustment
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS
36
Account Number
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.34-02
501-7630-548.35-01
501-7630-548.34-02
Invoice Amount
75.11
10.93
7.58
21.41
45.36
-366.19
-336.26
-127.33
-178.09
-280.74
-183.77
-101.65
-439.81
24.03
9.79
8.57
27.18
15.58
12.97
6.49
112.61
20.76
28. 93
3.96
19.35
4.07
61.73
6.41
63.05
8.73
8.18
6.49
8.30
1.49
85.56
22.65
152.57
64.98
32.49
3.00
4.57
1,150.69
Page 26
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04 To: 7/23/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
PETTIT OIL COMPANY.. June Gasoline-EOOO95 501-7630-548.32-10 126.80
June Gasoline-EOOO96 501-7630-548.32-10 100.50
June Gasoline-EOO138 501-7630-548.32-10 142.04
June Diesel-EOOO02 501-7630-548.32-11 44.45
June Diesel-EOOOO7 501-7630-548.32-11 92.60
June Diesel-EOOO11 501-7630-548.32-11 14.91
June Diesel-EOO143 501-7630-548.32-11 100.28
RUDDELL AUTO MALL AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2,317.56
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 32.07
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 43.32
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 70.29
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 50~ -7630~594.64-1 0 39,304.98
SANDY'S RACE STREET AUTO PARTS AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 95.08
SIOUX AUTOMATION CENTER INC AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 198.38
SNAP-ON TOOLS - CHUGGER DEANE AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 8.77
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 39.46
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 7.41
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 23.82
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2.19
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 22.92
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 132.48
AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2.83
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 11.43
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.48-10 9.75
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 4.70
AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 37.76
TELECOM LABS INC Maintenance-August 501-7630-548.42-10 7.78
TEREX UTILITIES WEST AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-594.64-10 11,027.96
TYLER & GUY AUTO BODY REPAIR AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 848.75
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.48-10 881.56
UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC AUTO & TRUCK MAl NT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2,924.10
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF Scan chgs-June 501-7630-548.42-10 11.83
WURTH USA INC AUTO & TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 81.71
Public Works-Equip Svcs Equipment Services Division Total: $72,068.68
Public Works-Equip Svcs Department Total: $72,068.68
Equipment Services Fund Total: $72,284.37
JPMORGANCHASE Software, line repairs 502 -0000-237.00-00 -3.16
Division Total: -$3.16
Department Total: -$3.16
HTE VAR LLC MANAGEMENT SERVICES 502-2081-518.48-02 5,064.11
JPMORGANCHASE Software,line repairs 502-2081-518.31-60 51.15
Internet phone 38 502-2081-518.42-10 32.10
Page 28
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04 To: 7/23/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
JPMORGANCHASE.. Car Rental 502-2081-518.43-10 386.37
OL YMPIC STATIONERS INC COPY PAPER 502-2081-518.31-01 43.86
TELECOM LABS INC Maintenance-August 502-2081-518.42-10 23.34
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE June Shipping chgs 502-2081-518.31-01 22.99
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF Scan chgs-June 502-2081-518.42-10 65.52
DATA PROC SERV &SOFTWARE 502-2081-518.48-02 9,500.43
Finance Department Information Technologies Division Total: $15,189.87
Finance Department Department Total: $15,189.87
Information Technology Fund Total: $15,186.71
BAILEY, JAMES A Disability Board-June 503-1631-517.46-35 488.89
ERGOMETRICS Testing fees 503-1631-517.41-50 324.08
Dennis Dickson MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 503-1631-517.46-30 38.36
Edward Schilke MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 503-16~1-517 .46-30 246.35
GLEN ROGGENBUCK Reimburse wellness 503-1631-517.41-51 250.00
Gerald Swayze, Jr MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 503-1631-517.46-30 104.00
James Baertschiger MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 503-1631-517.46-30 48.40
Jason Viada MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 503-1631-517.46-30 22.43
Jesse D Winfield MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 503-1631-517.46-30 75.00
Rik J Scairpon MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 503-1631-517.46-30 52.61
UNUM LIFE INS CO OF AMERICA LIT Disability-August 503-1631-517.46-31 1,215.54
LIT Disability-August 503-1631-517.46-31 1,092.15
Self Insurance Other Insurance Programs Division Total: $3,957.81
HEAL THCARE MGMT ADMNSTRS INC 07-06 Dental claims EFT 503-1637 -517.46-01 1,831.00
07-13 Dental claims EFT 503-1637 -517.46-01 8,578.90
Self Insurance Medical Benefits Division Total: $10,409.90
Terri Randall CLAIM SETTLEMENT 503-1671-517.49-98 346.56
SUMMIT LAW GROUP PLLC JUNE LABOR REPRESENTATION 503-1671-517.41-50 7,696.00
Self Insurance Comp Liability Division Total: $8,042.56
Self Insurance Department Total: $22,410.27
Self-Insurance Fund Fund Total: $22,410.27
PORT ANGELES DOWNTOWN ASSN PADA REMITTANCE 650-0000-231.91-00 7,500.00
PADA REMITTANCE 650-0000-231.92 -00 2,500.00
Division Total: $10,000.00
Department Total: $10,000.00
Off Street Parking Fund Fund Total: $10,000.00
ASM SIGNS Vinyls 652-8630-575.31-01 20.53
HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC Rope clips 652 -8630-5 7 5.31-01 1.91
Rope clips 652-8630-575.31-01 1.91
Lumber 652-8630-575.31-01 172.00
Exchange lumber 652-8630-575.31-01 9.65
Line post,tension bands 652-8630-575.31-01 11.01
Fasteners,screws 39 652-8630-575.31-01 1.59
Page 29
Date: 7/27/04
City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
From: 7/10/04 To: 7/23/04
Vendor Description Account Number Invoice Amount
LAUREL BLACK DESIGN 2005 NOP Visitor Guide 652-8630-575.44-10 150.00
PRINTERY COMMUNICATIONS Announcements,posters 652-8630-575.49-60 1,778.81
SENIUK, JAKE Cartridges,supplies 652-8630-575.31-01 273.90
Gasoline 652-8630-575.32-10 107.92
Artist hosting 652-8630-575.41-50 42.19
Business travel,meals 652-8630-575.43-10 83.78
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE Cable 652-8630-575.31-01 28.27
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC Painting supplies 652-8630-575.31-01 19.04
Painting supplies 652-8630-575.31-01 6.88
Lemon oil 652-8630-575.31-01 6.25
Posthole digger 652-8630-575.31-01 26.93
Paint supplies 652-8630-575.31-01 18.15
Paint supplies 652-8630-575.31-01 13.65
Mat,cable,rope 652-8630-575.31-01 5.37
Cable,stops,hooks 652-8630-575.31-01 5.27
TELECOM LABS INC Maintenance-August 652-8630-575.42-10 7.78
WASHINGTON (DIS), STATE OF Scan chgs-June 652-8630-575.42-10 38.35
Esther Webster/Fine Arts Esther Webster/Fine Arts Division Total: $2,831.14
Esther Webster/Fine Arts Department Total: $2,831.14
Esther Webster Fund Fund Total: $2,831.14
EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION P/R Deductions pe 07-18 920-0000-231.55-30 364.00
LEOFF June Contribution 920-0000-231.51-20 30.50
June Contribution 920-0000-231.51-21 24,919.98
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT P/R Deductions pe 07-18 920-0000-231.56-20 169.85
P/R Deductions pe 07-18 920-0000-231.56-20 1,643.39
PERS June Contribution 920-0000-231.51-10 12,130.37
P/R Deductions pe 07-04 920-0000-231.51-11 3,126.12
June Contribution 920-0000-231.51-12 13,722.93
UNITED WAY (PAYROLL) P/R Deductions pe 07-18 920-0000-231.56-10 320.97
VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSOCIATION P/R Deductions pe 07-18 920-0000-231.55-20 26.00
WSCFFIEMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST P/R Deductions pe 07-18 920-0000-231.53-20 1,425.00
Division Total: $57,879.11
Department Total: $57,879.11
Payroll Clearing Fund Total: $57,879.11
Totals for check period From: 7/10/04 To: 7/23/04 $660,360.54
40
Page 30
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
August 3, 2004
CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities#'-c""
Electric Underground Rebuild - Elwha Line Stage I, Project No. 02-11, Final
Acceptance
I
I
Summary: Superior Electric Northwest, Inc. of Bothell, Washington, has completed Electric
Underground Rebuild - Elwha Line Stage I, Project No. 02-11, which the City Council awarded
August 19, 2003 in the amount of $206,689.05, including sales tax. Minor changes in
construction units increased the final cost to $208,725.17, including sales tax.
Background/Analysis:
The City water pumping facility at the Ranney Collector is served by a 2.5 mile direct buried
12.47 kV underground line along the old railroad right of way (Milwaukee Avenue) installed in
1977. The expected life of underground cables is 20 to 30 years. The cables on this line have
been experiencing one or two failures per year over the last few years. Each failure requires
several days to locate and repair. The rebuild of this line in three phases over a three year period
was proposed, and Phase I was included in the 2003 CFP.
Phase I of the project is for the 4700 foot section ofline from 18th Street to the overhead crossing
of Dry Creek. The City Council on August 19,2003 awarded a construction contract to Superior
Electric Northwest, Inc. in the amount of$206,689.05, including sales tax.
Superior Electric Northwest, Inc. has completed the work and it has been approved by the project
manager and placed in service. A cable reel collapsed due to deterioration and could not be used
to feed cable. Replacing of the reel and resetting up for the pull increased the final cost to
$208,725.17, including sales tax.
Staff recommends that City Council accept Project No. 02-11 and authorize the release ofthe
retained percentage upon receipt of required releases.
N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Elwha Underground Rebuild, Phase t,1Alcept.doc
42
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
F..~.. '."0.. R..' T"''Pl' . .N....G/. '.'E"'.L" .E' 'So I
." '. ~ i'" ,"., ; / ' ': < f ! i :; ,
, " .. .: ".; ,.: '" '. '.
. " . , " ..', -,' ", '
~ ,.~",<,i:' j: ,. :: /.i !: r r" i; ; , r 1:, )
01, ./ ..... .... ......./,........, ........... .....' , ... >
WASHINGTON
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
U. S. A.
August 3,2004
CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities p. ~
2004 Water Main Improvements, Project No. 04-01, Acceptance of Project
Summary: Jordan Excavating, Inc. has completed all work. The\ project replaced approximately
1,575 linear feet of 8-inch ductile iron water main and related appurtenances. All work associated
with the project has been inspected and accepted as complete.
Recommendation: Accept Project No. 04-01 and authorize the release of the retained
ercenta e u on recei t of re uired releases.
Back~round / Analysis: On June 15,2004 Jordan Excavating, Inc. completed the installation of
approximately 1,575 linear feet of 8-inch ductile iron water main, including fire hydrants, valves,
and water service connections, from the main to existing water meters on East 2nd Street from
Chambers Street to Ennis Street.
One change order was issued. This change order was for additional asphaltic resurfacing of 2nd
Street. Most of the variation in estimated quantities was in added quantities of controlled density
fill (CDF), traffic control labor, and structural excavation. The following is a breakdown of the
contract costs, including applicable taxes:
Original Contract Change Variation in Final Cost Project Cost
Amount Orders (1) Estimated Quantity Variance
$176,295.07 $13,511.76 $9,131.61 $198,938.44 12.8%
It is recommended that City Council accept the project as completed by Jordan Excavating, Inc. and
authorize the release of the retained percentage upon receipt of required releases.
N:\CCOUNCIL\FlNAL\2004 Water Main Improvements, Project No. 04-01, Accept.wpd
43
44
CITY OF
A~N~c:'~El~ ES
..it ,UiIt~,.: ~
@
WASHINGTON, U.S.A
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE:
August 3, 2004
SUBJECT:
CITY COUNCIL
Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities ~&
Set Public Hearing for Solid Waste Rate Study
To:
FROM:
Summary: Economic and Engineering Services and City staff have completed a cost of service
study that analyzes the revenue requirements for the Solid Waste Utility for the period from
January 2005 through closure in December 2006. The study will rlso analyze cost requirements
after the landfill closes and the transfer station is constructed. The latter study will be presented
towards the end of 2004, after proposals are received for the transfer station.
Recommendation: Set a public hearing for August 17th, 2004 to receive comments on the
ro osed rate increases for the Solid Waste Utili .
Background/Analysis: Economic and Engineering Services (EES) and City staff have
completed a Cost of Service Study for the period from January 2005 through December 2006, at
which time the Landfill will close and the City will begin long hauling its solid waste. The
contract with EES covers two time periods, pre-closure, which will be presented to City Council
at the next meeting, and a post closure study, analyzing costs under a long haul scenario, which
will be presented later in 2004.
The pre-closure study is being presented at this early date to accommodate the commercial
haulers that utilize the landfill, and must take any rate increase requests to the Utilities and
Transportation Commission (UTC).
At this meeting, it is requested that the City Council set a public hearing date on August 17, 2004
to hear the presentation from EES and to allow public input to the process after the presentation.
The Schedule is as follows:
August 3, 2004
Set public hearing date
August 17, 2004
Presentation by EES
Open public hearing-receive input from public
Continue public hearing to September 7, 2004
September 7,2004
Close public hearing
Consider adoption of new rate ordinance
N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Solid Waste Rate Study - Set Public Hearingi~
46
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
August 3, 2004
CITY COUNCIL
SUE ROBERDS, ASSISTANT PLANNER
STREET V ACA TION PETITION - STV 03-03
PORTION OF "K" STREET SOUTH OF MARINE DRIVE
Summary: The proposal is to vacate a portion of the "K" Street right-of-way between Marine Drive
and the City's industrial waterline. I
Recommendation: The Department of Community Development recommends that the City Council
adopt the attached resolution setting a public hearingfor consideration of the vacation at the Council's
Sevtember 7, 2004, re.f!ular meetinz.
Back~round / Analysis:
A valid petition for the vacation of a portion of the "K" Street right-of-way located south of
Marine Drive was submitted by the abutting property owners, the Port of Port Angeles and Daishowa
America (now Nippon Paper) on September 5, 2003. Per RCW 35.79.010, upon receipt of a valid
petition requesting vacation of right-of-way, the legislative authority shall fix a time determined by
resolution when the petition will be heard. The City's policy requires staff to first meet with the
petitioners to discuss compensation for the property prior to setting a public hearing date. The Council's
Real Estate Committee considered the proposed street vacation in October, 2003, and directed staff to
work further with the Port on the issue of an exchange of property rather than monetary compensation.
Due to unforeseen circumstances surrounding activities at the State of Washington Department of
Transportation graving dock site, this item was continued by the Real Estate Committee in November,
2003, to a date uncertain. In June, 2004, the Real Estate Committee met to continue discussion on the
item and agreed on the specifics for a compensatory trade of property. The action originally requested
is then now ready for continued review.
Per RCW 35.79 and the City's policies with regard to the processing of vacation proposals, it
would be appropriate at this time to accept the petition by adoption ofthe resolution setting a Council
public hearing for consideration ofthe matter, and forward the issue to the Planning Commission for a
recommendation.
Staff will be available for comment. The petition and map are attached for your information.
)' 0
l/ '--..-k. '.' i
. . ... // ,; / i F-/v j tiil\"'l
/y./-:..... " ;:'(/'/ .
Sue Roberds, Aso/stant Planner
Attachments: Resolution and Map
Petition
47
48
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Councij ot the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, setting a hearing date for a petition to vacate a portion of
"K" Street in Port Angeles, Washington.
WHEREAS, a petition is on file with the City of Port Angeles to vacate City right-of-
way described as follows:
That portion of"K" Street abutting Block 131 and Block 139, Township 30
North, Range 6 WWM, Port Angeles; and
WHEREAS, the petition has been signed by the owner of more than two-thirds ofthe
property abutting upon the right-of-way to be vacated;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by tlle City Council of the City of Port
Angeles as follows:
Section 1. The petition to vacate the above-described City right-of-way shall be heard
by the City Council in the Council Chambers, 321 East Fifth Street, at the Council's regular meeting
on September 7,2004 at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, which is not more than sixty
(60) days nor less than twenty (20) days hereafter.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to give twenty (20) days notice of the
pendency ofthe petition and the time and place of the hearing in accordance with the provisions of
RCW 35.79.020.
P AS SED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 3rd day of August, 2004.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
G :\Legal_ Backup\ORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONS\R2004-1 2.Street
Vacation.wpd; July 14, 2004
49 -1-
.~e
.--o{\
.~0{\f\e-,
~
0'"
I Q)
~Q)
o~
...
>Cf)
~=
Cf)~
,:.-
z 0
o c:
_ 0
~ .-
_1:::
~ 0
WCL
CLI
Z C/')
OQ)
-Q)
~C>
<( c:
0<(
<(1:::
>0
~CL
w~
WO
(k::1:::
~O
Cf)CL
~ Z
...
50
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
STREET VACATION PETITION
TO: The City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington-
Come now the undersigned petitioners and pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW respectfully show
II \\
1. The undersigned petitioners request that the following described portion of ~ _
Street/Alley in the City of Port Angeles be vacated pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW (legally describe th
property requestedforvacation below). '. /..L/' ~_
/7id jDC'JRil ON 6+- ~'k "S7-/,e e-r Q: ~'U-O-;:;:J. .o/~ /..3/ ~c:I
E /6 c.J< 139.) T{}-a~,,:E; J(/ /0 .::3 t1J A.J / /Q CVL'j e & 'nJ
2. Each of the undersigned petitioners is the owner of an interest in real estate abutting on the abovl
described area.
3. ~ persons own property abutting on said area.
4. The names and addresses of property owners abutting on said areas are as follows:
~ Address
Q~\ ~ 8R:1 ~1l?f'e~
ba \-4.(',..t.0CL..o ~ f"~tQl' (I a )
...-=)?, ex t d, fI i? ~ T .si-) t=6 ~I Pp, / (<=:> /'E?-S
jq6"J- [Y)C1f'I-h~br-~\t'e-" R~I ~1r=-1e.:2.
-3;; IE. ~Ptd, ) fhR't~j~(~<'
~4~~~i- ~1F/~_C,
5. The undersigned petitioners constitute more than two thirds of the owners of said abutting
property.
WHEREFORE, the petitioners ask that proceedings be commenced hereon for the vacation
of said area of said If f.!.. 1I Street/Alley in the manner prescribed in Chapter 35.79 RCW.
Respectfully submitted,
Address
Phone
..,.=i3c::g uJ, FiRST ~
1'81 S !\\thl.u /'Jr.
(3100 ) '15'7 -2s~
(3' 0) qS1... 'I-'f 71'
File No.
51
CITY OF PORT ANGELES, 321 East Fifth Street, P.O. Box J J 50. Port Anpr:IF._, W A QR~';'7 f"J.t;m A I '7 vlen
C[a[[am 'Transit System
830 W. Lauridsen Blvd.
Port Angeles, WA 98363
(360) 452-1315
1-800-858-3747 WA
FAX (360) 452-1316
Passenger Assistance:
(360) 452-4511
July 12, 2004
Mayor Richard Headrick
City of Port Angeles
PO Box 1150
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
Dear Mayor Headrick:
The enabling legislation for public transportation benefit areas (PTBAs), RCW 36.57A, as
amended, calls for the General Manager of the Clallam Transit System, as chief
administrative officer for the PTBA, to call a meeting to review the composition of the
governing body of the PTBA and to change that composition if any change is deemed
appropriate. Such meetings are to be held every four years.
In accordance with that statute, a copy of which is attached for your information, I hereby
request that an elected official be designated to be your jurisdiction's representative at a
meeting to be held on Monday, August 16, 2004, immediately following the regular meeting
of the Clallam Transit System Board (approximately 2:00 p.m., but no sooner). The meeting
will be held at the Clallam Transit System, 830 West Lauridsen Boulevard, Port Angeles,
Washington 98363. The current transit Board members representing the City of Port
Angeles are Councilman Gary Braun and Councilman Jack Pittis.
If I can be of any assistance in this
DAD:meb
Enclosures 2
pc: Becky Upton, City Clerk
53
Revised Code of Washington and Washington Administrative Code
Page 1 of 1
MunicipaJ Rese;:;l'cll & SelVices Ceme,.. Working To[,,"Sttlerfor ExceUence in Local Governmenf
Click folder icon to
contents
New Search Prey Match Next Match Clear Highlights Find Similar Prey Section J\ ;'
(~ F<CVV ane) WP-,C
Revised Code of Washington
{:i] RCVV 36 TiTLE
(~ F~CW 36 . 57 A CHAF"TEF
RCW 36.57A.055
Governing body -- Periodic review of composition.
o RCW SECTIONS
G1 rc'\;v "6' '-7., 010 h'[1'
o ~,< ,) j . ,,)i Q.. !! J..ii. ,I
EJ revv 36. 57a,O"11.htrn
Gl r'"'' 3{; r~! ~ n')() h',--
L:J L-\~ '.'.1 .~) cL,,).t._\..1 do! II
Gl rc" "6 '7~ 0.')(\ I-t',.,.,
1=.1 -"<oJ",) ~'-) <1,.);)..../.11111
EJ rew 36 _ 578.040.htm
Gl ~.' 3" r,._ oeo 11' ,-
l:.i r,...v'v \''')..J (<;.1. 0 . \.11 t
EJ rew 36 . 578.055.htm
@J reli\' 36 . 57a.060.htm
EJ rew 36 _ 578.070.htrn
@J rcw 36 . 57a,OeO.htm
EJ rew 36 . 57a.090.l1tm
@J rcw 36. 57a.l00.htm
EJ rew 36 . 57a.l1 O.htm
@J rew 36. 57a.120.htm
EJ rev./36. 57a.130.htrn
@J rcw 36. 57a.140.htm
EJ rew 36 - 57a.150.htm
EJ rew 36. 57a.160.htm
@J rew 36. 57a.17011tm
@J rew 36. 57a,180.htm
EJ rew 36 . 57a 191.htrn
EJ rew 36. 57a.200.titrn
EJ rew 36. 57a.210.htm
After a public transportation benefit area has been in existence
for four years, members of the county legislative authority and
the elected representative of each city within the boundaries of
the public transportation benefit area shall review the
composition of the governing body of the benefit area and
change the composition of the governing body if the change is
deemed appropriate. The review shall be at a meeting of the
designated representatives of the component county and cities,
and the majority of those present shall constitute a quorum at
such meeting. Twenty days notice of the meeting shall be given
by the chief administrative officer of the public transportation
benefit area authority. After the initial review, a review shall be
held every four years.
If an area having a population greater than fifteen percent, or
areas with a combined population of greater than twenty-five
percent of the population of the existing public transportation
benefit area as constituted at the last review meeting, annex to
the public transportation benefit area, or if an area is added under
RCW 16,5.IAJ1Q(2), the representatives ofthe component
county and cities shall meet within ninety days to review and
change the composition ofthe governing body, if the change is
deemed appropriate. This meeting is in addition to the regular
four-year review meeting and shall be conducted pursuant to the
same notice requirement and quorum provisions of the regular
rev] ew.
[1991 c 3189 16; 1983 c 6594.]
NOTES:
Intent -- 1991 c 318: See note following RCW 36.57 A.040.
54
http://search.mrsc.org/nxtlgateway.dll?f=templates&fn=legpage .htm$vi d=rcwwac: leg
6/1612004
C[a[[am 'Transit System
830 W. Lauridsen Blvd.
Port Angeles, WA 98363
(360) 452-1315
1-800-858-3747 WA
FAX (360) 452-1316
Passenger Assistance:
(360) 452-4511
LEGAL NOTICE
Notice of Public MeetinQ
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that in accordance with the procedures outlined in RCW
36.57 A.055, a meeting concerning the composition of the Clallam Transit System Board
shall be held at the date, time, and location as indicated below:
Date:
Monday, August 16, 2004
Time:
Immediately following the regular meeting of the Clallam
Transit System Board (approximately 2:00 p.m., but no
sooner)
Place:
Clallam Transit System
830 West Lauridsen Boulevard
Port Angeles, Washington 98363
The purpose of the meeting shall be to review the composition of the governing body of
the Clallam Transit System and to change the composition of the governing body if the
change is deemed appropriate.
Daniel A. Di Guilio
General Manager
For Publication:
Peninsula Dailv News
July 25, 2004
55
56
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
August 4, 2004 .
Daniel A. Di Guilio
General Manager
Clallam Transit System
830 W. LaUridsen Blvd.
Port Angeles, W A 98363
Re: Composition ofPTBA Governing Body
Dear Mr. Di Guilio:
This letter is written as a follow-up to your letter of July 12, 2004, to Mayor Richard
Headrick. You had requested that the City designate an elected official as our
jurisdiction's representative to attend a meeting to review the composition of the
governing body of the PTBA.
At its meeting of August 3, 2004, the City Council unanimously appointed
Councilmember Gary Braun to serve as that designated representative. Please contact
Councilmember Braun should any changes be made to your proposed meeting schedule.
Please contact me if! can provide any further assistance. I can be reached at 360-417-
4634.
Sincerely yours,
.~
Becky J. Upt n, CMC
City Clerk/Management Assistant
Copy: Councilmember Braun
321 EAST FIFTH STREET. P. O. BOX 1 150 . PORT ANGELES, WA 98362-0217
PHON E: 360-417-4500. FAX: 360-417-4509 . TTY: 360-417-4645
E-MAIL: CITYMGR@CITYOFPA.Us
. J 1-800-858-3747WA
830 W. Laundsen Blvd. FAX (360) 452-1316
Port Angeles, WA 98363 P A . t
assenger SSIS ance:
(360) 452-4511
July 12, 2004
Mayor Richard Headrick
City of Port Angeles
PO Box 1150
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
Dear Mayor Headrick:
The enabling legislation for public transportation benefit areas (PTBAs), RCW 36.57A, as
amended, calls for the General Manager of the Clallam Transit System, as chief
administrative officer for the PTBA, to call a meeting to review the composition of the
governing body of the PTBA and to change that composition if any change is deemed
appropriate. Such meetings are to be held every four years.
In accordance with that statute, a copy of which is attached for your information, I hereby
request that an elected official be designated to be your jurisdiction's representative at a
meeting to be held on Monday, August 16, 2004, immediately following the regular meeting
of the Clallam Transit System Board (approximately 2:00 p.m., but no sooner). The meeting
will be held at the Clallam Transit System, 830 West Lauridsen Boulevard, Port Angeles,
Washington 98363. The current transit Board members representing the City of Port
Angeles are Councilman Gary Braun and Councilman Jack Pittis.
If I can be of any assistance in this
DAD:meb
Enclosures 2
pc: Becky Upton, City Clerk
53
Revised Code of Washington and Washington Administrative Code
Page 1 of 1
Municipal Ret!:iMrr:h& Services Cen:tel' _ Working Togefherfor Excellence in Loci'll Govamroonl
Click folder icon to expand
contents
New Search Prey Match Next Match Clear Highlights Find Similar Prey Section
RCW and WAC
ifriI Revised Code of Washington
RCW 36 TITLE
~ RCW 36 57 A CHAPTEf~
RCW 36.57 A.055
Governing body -- Periodic review of composition.
Lillill RCW SECTIONS
El few 3fi ,57a.O'IO,htrn
El rew 36 , 573,01'1 ,htm
El few 36 , 57a020.htm
El rew 36 , 57a,030.htm
El few 36 . 57a.040.htrn
r=I rew 36 . 57a,050,him
El rew 36 . 57a.055,htrn
El rew 36 ,57a,060,htm
El rew 36 , 57a.070.htrn
El rew 36. 57a,080Nm
r=I rew 36 , 57a.090.htrn
r=I rew 36, 57a.i00,htm
El rew 36 57a.i10.htrn
EI rew 36. 57a,i20,htm
El rew 36, 57a.i30,htrn
EI rew 36 . 57a.i40.htm
El rew 36 . 57a.i50,htrn
r=I rew 36 ,57a.i60.htm
El rew 36, 57a.i70.htITl
EI rew 36, 57a.i80.htm
El few 36, 57a,19i.htm
El rew 36 . S7a.200.htm
El rew 36. 57a.210.htrn
After a public transportation benefit area has been in existence
for four years, members of the county legislative authority and
the elected representative of each city within the boundaries of
the public transportation benefit area shall review the
composition of the governing body of the benefit area and
change the composition of the governing body if the change is
deemed appropriate. The review shall be at a meeting of the
designated representatives of the component county and cities,
and the majority of those present shall constitute a quorum at
such meeting. Twenty days notice of the meeting shall be given
by the chief administrative officer of the public transportation
benefit area authority. After the initial review, a review shall be
held every four years.
If an area having a population greater than fifteen percent, or
areas with a combined population of greater than twenty-five
percent of the population of the existing public transportation
benefit area as constituted at the last review meeting, annex to
the public transportation benefit area, or if an area is added under
RCW 36..,52A.14.0(2), the representatives of the component
county and cities shall meet within ninety days to review and
change the composition of the governing body, if the change is
deemed appropriate. This meeting is in addition to the regular
four-year review meeting and shall be conducted pursuant to the
same notice requirement and quorum provisions of the regular
reVIew.
[1991 c 3189 16; 1983 c 6594.]
NOTES:
Intent -- 1991 c 318: See note following RCW 36....57 A.040.
54
http://search.mrsc.org/nxt/gateway.dll?f=templates&fn=legpage.htm$vid=rcwwac : leg
6/16/2004
C[a[[am ~ransit System
830 W. Lauridsen Blvd.
Port Angeles, WA 98363
(360) 452-1315
1-800-858-3747 WA
FAX (360) 452-1316
Passenger Assistance:
(360) 452-4511
LEGAL NOTICE
Notice of Public Meetina
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that in accordance with the procedures outlined in RCW
36.57 A.055, a meeting concerning the composition of the Clallam Transit System Board
shall be held at the date, time, and location as indicated below:
Date:
Time:
Place:
Monday, August 16, 2004
Immediately following the regular meeting of the Clallam
Transit System Board (approximately 2:00 p.m., but no
sooner)
Clallam Transit System
830 West Lauridsen Boulevard
Port Angeles, Washington 98363
The purpose of the meeting shall be to review the composition of the governing body of
the Clallam Transit System and to change the composition of the governing body if the
change is deemed appropriate.
Daniel A. Di Guilio
General Manager
For Publication:
Peninsula Daily News
July 25, 2004
55
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FORTANGEtES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
August 3, 2004
CITY COUNCIL
SUE ROBERDS, ASSISTANT PLANNER
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
WEST 10TH STREET
Summary: A proposal to develop a 33 unit subdivision on an approximately 10 acre site in the
RS-9, Residential Single Family zone.
Recommendation: The Department of Community Development recommends that the City
Council concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the Mountain
View Estates preliminary subdivision citing the Planning Commission's recommended conditions,
findings, and conclusions in support of that action.
Background / Analysis:
Following a public hearing conducted on July 14,2004, the Planning Commission moved
7-0 to recommend approval of the Mountain View Estates preliminary subdivision with conditions
relating to required infrastructure improvements per Section 16.08 P AMC and the City's Urban
Services Standards and Guidelines for low impact development. The property is located between
Milwaukee Drive and West lOth Street and will result in lots that meet the City's minimum standards
with regard to lot size in the RS-9 zone. Standards with regard to lot width to depth ratio, street and
utility development, and residential and emergency vehicle access issues have been reviewed and
will meet the City's standards for subdivisions as conditioned.
Staffs report and an excerpt of the Planning Commission's minutes are attached for your
i n form ati on.
o / ' /'} '/
\i,' /7' .;/,'/ /] ~-)~---)c ,c.,. "._.,;"</-',
~J ,,t. /l-t / _ _ ~ J
Sue Roberds, Aj~istant Planner
Attachments:
Conditions, Findings and Conclusions
July 14,2004, Planning Commission Minutes
Department Report
Application
57
58
Jun-16-0412:19
Clark LRnd office
360-G~-531C
o n?
. ........ &-
PRt.LlM/fJARY
PLA T FOR:
MOUIVTAIN
SUBURBIIN LOJ 46, T;!!T~()F ~~: ~~_.~-w i
ril_ALI L' JJ.f/, ("(-Ji it-i j Y VVA5! l!tvGTvnN . . H ,.., 1 ". 'Innl.
. ,. .' '-' '-' v' . , , ,_ I I.) U!~ i:1 LUL'1
I
!
I
I
CITY OF PORT ANGEL ~ I
D~pt. of Com.n::unity Develop en! !
~JQlI
till )11 (J
SCAli IN Fcrr
. I
I
till
..-.---.
,/.,.-
----..........
---..-.
\
~))iJ) G
VICINITY MAE"
......................
j)!' rlJ(;~
$lvJ( (J/' .n.JI'''
NorIS:
'. o",N ~PACF ""'Nll(~.""P : /'fOAIfOWHFRS
()Ii (lP[/oI Y'ACF F:tSL KVCO (Of' FUnJR,
"'T[R RlTF/me'" ,AH{A
~.t~./IJ!"T..L ~"'GL[ F..,," Y (RSD ~ONINa)
SHI:.CT
OF 2
JUNE 16. 2004
J.CC[f':/D:
"',Ll o,-"ul(:; PRoposeD FlR, "Y'.>>:.ANT
w ..._ DFhOrrs. EXJSONc; ~1"""'f" ~[lIt'fli liNE
_ .~~~ w."NCJTC;; C~I$7ItoiC "ATf/{ rlNF
59
OJ
I"NC.5:l.Fl~Y1Hc;.
"'AF>F-I~C;;
DlVll.lI"'WrH' r.r,N~l Tlhle".
CCW~iRlj[ TIDItol ~"H"GC.,a(I"l"!..
____ _f;C, E1~ :IU
1ilJ: ~ ~lt. ~..
~_........J "c.)I";
. t.i.ui MI'- ~.~.
........':':1111
tau ... ~711\
F.A.l.(JUt< -U<lw)
_..
60
CONDITIONS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE MOUNTAIN VIEW
ESTATES PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION:
Conditions:
1.
Local access streets shall be constructed per the City's urban service standards, which
includes a 20' asphalt surface with ditches and a minimum 4' all weather surface walkway
separated from the roadway by the ditch prior to approval of the final plat. Signage shall
be placed on all streets developed to low impact development standards indicating that
on-street parking is prohibited along both sides of the streets. 10' radii shall be identified
on Lots 7, 8, 21, 22, and 23, and open space area for turning shall be located at roadway
intersections.
2.
Street improvement to the Milwaukee Drive right-of-way along the frontage of the
subdivision shall be placed in accordance with the City's Urban Services and Design
Standards for arterial streetslbicycle routes that includes an 8' all weather surface
walkway and bike route. Street improvements [10m tIl\-' ;utGd6stisFl. efMih\'BNhs6 Drive
from the western boundary of the subdivision along West Tenth Street to "N" Street
connecting to the nearest improved street shall be made per the City's Urban Services and
Standards Guidelines that includes a 4' all weather surface walkway with ditches if
developed to the City's low impact development standards. Street trees shall be planted
on the fronting lots along West 10th Street per the City's Urban Services and Guidelines
Policy 3G.1 00 Street Trees and Landscaping.
3.
Fire hydrants shall be placed and spaced as required by the City's Fire Department to a
maximum 1000' of separation distance. Wording shall be placed on the final plat and
recorded with the County Auditor upon filing of the final subdivision indicating that all
residences shall be fitted with residential sprinkler systems prior to occupancy.
4.
Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground.
,
Prior to final plat approval, an 8 inch water s~all be extended to the lots as
required by the Public Works and Utilities Department.
5.
6.
Stonnwater plans shall be submitted for approval per the City's Urban Services Standards
and Guidelines and installed prior to final plat approval.
7.
Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works and
Utilities Department.
8.
Building address numbers provided by the City's Building Division shall be placed on the
final plat.
9.
The applicant shall place a statement on the plat and make it known to all subsequent
purchasers of the lots that said lots are in the proximity of the William R. Fairchild
International Airport and that the Port of Port Angeles does not warrant that these lots
will always be outside the lowest noise contour currently established for residential use.
61
Findings and Conclusions - Mountain View Estates
August 3, 2004
Page 2
10. The applicant shall provide a play area suitable for small children living in or visiting the
proposed residences or shall contribute to the development of the City's undeveloped
park adjacent to the subject site per the approval of the City's Park and Recreation
Director.
Findings:
1. Preliminary approval is for the 33-unit subdivision submitted by Clark Land Office on
June 8, 2004, for Darrel Vincent identified as being Suburban Lot 46 within the Townsite
of Port Angeles and located in the 2300 Block of Milwaukee Drive extending to West
10th Street. The site is approximately 10 acres in size and is nearly square in
configuration.
2. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zonin~ Map as Single Family
Residential (RS-9) which allows a density of up to 6 units per acre. The proposed
drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 9,000 square
feet in area.
3. The purpose of the City's RS-9, Residential Single Family zone is a low density
residential zone intended to create and preserve urban single family residential
neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family homes on larger than standard
Townsite-size lots. Uses that are compatible with and functionally related to a single
family residential environment may be located in this zone. Because of land use impacts
associated with nonresidential uses, few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and
then only conditionally. This zone provides for a variety in the urban land use pattern for
the City's single family residential neighborhoods, following a curvilinear street system
of non through public and private streets with irregularly shaped lots, minimum 75-foot
front lot lines, and 60-foot right~-of-way for collector arterial streets in large rectangular
blocks and usually located in outlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable land.
4. The subject property is identified as Low Density Residential (LDR) on the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
5. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency at the time of development for streets,
water service, sanitary sewer service, and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element
Policy A.9) and should require concurrency at the time of development for solid waste
collection, stormwater management, telecommunications service, and emergency service
(Capital Facilities Element Policy A.I 0). The proposal has been reviewed with respect to
the Comprehensive Plan and the following Comprehensive Plan policies are relevant to
the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A and
Policy A.2; Goal B and Policies B.1, B.2, B.3, BA, and Goal C; Transportation Element
Goal A and Policies A.3, A.6, B.I0, B.I1, B.14, and B.18; Utilities and Public Services
Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goals A and B and Policies B.I, B.3, BA,
B.5, B.6, B.7, and Goal C, Policies C.2, C.3 and CA.
62
Findings and Conclusions - Mountain View Estates
August 3, 2004
Page 3
6. Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (P AMC) sets forth local requirements
for the approval of subdivisions. Section 16.08.050(B)(1) P AMC provides that the
PlaIming Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written
recommendations of City Departments and shall either approve or disapprove the
submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a
period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City Department of
Community Development. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the
proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting. Said preliminary approval shall become
void unless a final plat is submitted and approved by the City within the five year period.
7. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the
unifon11 division ofland within the State. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire
into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a
subdivision and determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the
public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys and other public ways, transit stops, potable wrter supplies, sanitary wastes,
parks and recreation, playgrounds, and schools and shall consider all other relevant facts
including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for
students who only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served
by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can
make written findings that these provisions are made.
8. The Port Angeles Public Works and Utilities, Department of Community Development,
Parks and Recreation, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed subdivision. Their
comments and specific conditions have been incorporated into the Department's
recommendation. Water, power, garbage pickup, telecommunications, sewer, and
emergency services are available within acceptable standards to the site or will be
extended through conditions to the preliminary plat.
9. The subdivision will create three new interior access streets that must be developed to
City standards per the City's Urban Services and Standards Guidelines.
10. The site is currently served by Milwaukee Drive and West Tenth Street. Milwaukee
Drive is improved to one-half width but West Tenth Street is unimproved with a gravel
surface. Milwaukee Drive is an arterial and a designated bicycle route but is not a school
walking route. "N" Street (to the east of the area) is partially designated as a school
walking route. Improvements to Milwaukee Drive will be required such that the final
roadway is an improved width of 24' with a ditch and 8' pedestrian/bicyc1e path
established on the south side per the City's new suburban low impact development
standards. West Tenth Street from the Milwaukee Drive/Tenth Street intersection east to
the acceptable road improvement on West Tenth Street (toward "N" Street) shall be
developed to the City's Urban Services and Guidelines Standards which will include a 4'
pedestrian path.
11. U sing data provided in the Trip Generation ManuaL 5th Ed. (Institute of Traffic
Engineers, 1991), a maximum of 320 average daily vehicle trips (ADT) may be generated
at full build out of the subdivision. Based on the 1989 "City and County Design
63
Findings and Conclusions - Mountain View Estates
August 3,2004
Page 4
Standards for the Construction of Urban and Rural Arterials and Collectors", the
appropriate width for a minor collector with an ADT ofless than 400 is 20 feet of paved
surfacing. Right-of-way for residential streets will be dedicated within the subdivision to
provide a minimum 20' improved roadway surface with a pedestrian walking path.
Adequate right-of-way exists within the existing 100-foot right-of-way for Milwaukee
Drive to complete a 24-foot asphalt surface with ditching and 8-foot walking/bicycle
path. Approximately 2.16 acres of land will be developed as streets.
12. The City's low impact development standards for suburban areas were adopted in 2003
with the understanding that subdivisions developed under the reduced standards would
not allow for on-street parking. Site development and design for residential lots
developed under the lower impact standards need to accommodate resident parking and
visitor parking on-site. Roadside ditches developed under low impact development
standards should be kept free of debris.
13. The proposal was reviewed with regard to the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Section
16.08 P AMC) which provides specific design standards which are expected of
subdivisions within the City limits while the City's Urban Services Standards and
Guidelines indicates that street trees should be planted along arterial streets and provides
guidance for such placement and tree species. The design standards identified in Section
16.08.060 F P AMC state that street trees are a protection against excessive heat and glare
and enhance the attractiveness and value of abutting property. The City will assist the
subdivider in location of trees and species to use under varying conditions. It is
recommended that trees be planted inside the property lines where they are less subject to
injury, decrease the chance of motor accidents and enjoy more favorable conditions for
growth. If trees are to be planted within the right-of-way, proposed locations and species
to be used must be submitted for review and approval by the City.
14. There are no environmentally sensitive areas on the site. The site is flat and is not
considered a frequently flooded area nor is it listed on the Federal Emergency
Management Act (FEMA) maps which denote those areas that are within 100-year flood
areas.
15. The owner of a construction site which disturbs a total of five acres or more of land area
that has a discharge of stormwater to a surface water or storm sewer system must apply to
the State Department of Ecology for a General Permit for Stormwater Discharge
Associated with Construction Activities. .
16. Building permits are required for all structures within the subdivision. All local building
and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler
systems.
17. The Port Angeles School District has been notified of the development to allow them to
plan for needed public school facilities and routes. School busses travel along "N" Street.
Hamilton School is the closest school to the site.
64
Findings and'Conclusions - Mountain View Estates
August 3. 2004
Page 5
18. The City's Parks Department responded that they are aware ofthe preliminary proposal
and do not believe the level of service for the area will be hampered as a result of the
development. The City's LOS for parks and recreational services is 1/3 acre for 1,000
population. An undeveloped wooded property donated to the City for a park use is
located on property adjacent to the subject site along "N" Street. The nearest public
playground area is located approximately one-half mile east (Crown Park) or east
(Lincoln Park).
19. The site will be serviced by the City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments. All
utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the
area. Transit service is available along "N" Street east of the site.
20. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance for the preliminary subdivision on July 9,2004, therefore satisfying the
City's responsibility under the Act.
21. The William R. Fairchild Intemational Airport is located south of the site. Port of Port
Angeles staff has been notified of the proposed subdivision proposal and per agreement
with the Port, it is expected that those who purchase properties in the final subdivision
will be aware of the existing on-going airport operation.
22. The Planning Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The
Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval.
Reports are advisory only to ensure conformance of the proposed subdivision to the
general purposes of the City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and
specifications adopted by the City.
23. Property owners within 300 feet of the proposed subdivision were mailed notice of the
proposal and the property was posted on June 16,2004. Publication appeared in the
Peninsula Daily News on June 22, 2004. No written comments have been received to
date.
Conclusions:
A. As conditioned, the proposed ShOli plat is consistent with the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
B. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance,
Chapter 16.08 P AMC, and Chapter 58.17 RCW of the Washington State Subdivision Act
C. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and
general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that
assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school.
65
Findings and Conclusions - Mountain View Estates
August 3. 2004
Pnge 6
D. As conditioned, signage educating residents and visitors a to the prohibition of on-street
parking will ensure that interior streets remain passab1 r public safety situations where
on-street parking could prevent ease of passage for ergency vehicles and sight distance
safety issues.
E. The site has served as a drainage area over e years due to its topography. Clearing and
grading activities will require handling 0 e existing drainage and future stormwa r
from the site as a result of deve10pmen hrough the subdivision process.
F. As conditioned, the public interest' served in the platting of this subdivisio as
aIiiculated in the City's Compre nsive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning 0 inances. The
subdivision provides for devel pment of new homes within the City 0 ort Angeles
consistent with the State of shington Growth Management Act.
Adopted by the Port Angeles C y Council at its meeting of AuguS{ 3
66
Findillgs and Conclusions - MOllntaill View Estates
AI/gust 3,2004
Page 6
~nt~
D. As conditioned, signage educating residents and visitors as to the prohibition of on-street
parking will ensure that interior streets remain passable for public safety situations where
on-street parking could prevent ease of passage for emergency vehicles and sight distance
safety issues.
E. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting of this subdivision as
miiculated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The
subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles
consistent with the State of Washington Growth Management Act.
lli2li~nmeeting of Angust 3,2004
Richard A. Headrick, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
66
Planning Commission Minutes
July J 4, 2004
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - MOUNTAIN VIE'V ESTATES - 2500 Block West
loth Street: Consideration of a preliminary subdivision of a lO acre property in the RS-9
Residential Single Family zone.
Assistant Planner Sue Roberds reviewed staffs report recommending approval of the
preliminary subdivision and responded to questions. With the assistance of Director Collins, a
Power Point review was provided of the proposed subdivision and surrounding property
development. Required road improvements were discussed. Chair Hewins opened the public
hearing.
Dan'el Vincent, 711 E. Front Street, Port Angeles, WA supported the proposal but asked
for clarification of the road improvements that would be required for the development.
Director Collins responded that in light ofthe fact that this is the second subdivision that Mr.
Vincent has planned for the neighborhood, some amendment of required road requirements for the
earlier subdivision may be made with the approval of the City's Public Works and Utilities
Department that would result in the City's standards being met for streets in the area but in a
different manner than previously required in the earlier subdivision review. The earlier subdivision
was approved with a condition that Milwaukee Drive be improved extending east to the improved
portion of Milwaukee Drive, which happens to be at the entrance to the proposed Mountain View
Estates. Preliminary approval of Mountain View Estates will require that improvements be made
along Milwaukee Drive east a short distance from the property frontage connecting to the improved
portion of Milwaukee Drive. Improvement of West 10th Street along the property frontage to "N"
Street is also required for the current subdivision.
The Planning Commission then discussed several options with regard to road improvements.
In response to Mr. Vincent's request regarding clarification of road improvements that would be
required along West 10th Street for the Mountain View Estates Subdivision, Mr. Collins noted, fif
the improvement is extended to the intersection of Milwaukee Drive along West 10th Street, road
improvements for the first subdivision may only need to be extended from the site [of the first
Vincent subdivision] to the intersection, which would then extend to "N" Street rather than east to
the improved portion of Milwaukee Drive as was required for the first Vincent subdivision. The
City's ability to work with the applicant(s) in revising required road improvement requirements to
ensure that, if one of the subdivisions does not become a reality, logical improvements for access
streets in the area to the nearest fully improved street will still need to be completed to serve the
development.
Continued discussion indicated that, although West lOth Street is improved with a chip seal
surface, it does not meet minimum City standards. As the property owner between the subject
property and "N" Street is the City of Port Angeles, along the north side of the street, it may be
possible for the City to participate now or as a latecomer property owner in any required
improvement to the street required by the Public Works and Utilities Department.
Development of the City's property that is adjacent to the proposed subdivision was
discussed relative to the provision of a park area within the proposed Mountain View Estates
subdivision. Director Collins suggested that if the City were to surplus property in the area, it is
likely that enough property would be retained to provide for a small neighborhood park.
67
Planning Commission Minutes
July /4. 2004
Page]
Director Collins responded to Commissioner Nutter that, as a rule, neighborhood parks are
around 2 acres in size and should be situated within a one-half mile radius of the development that
it is intended to serve. Commissioner Nutter commented that park areas are sparse in this area of
the City with the exception of Crown Park and Lincoln Park.
There being no further testimony, Chair Hewins closed the public hearing.
Following extensive discussion regarding parks planning and clarification of
street/access development issues, Commissioner Philpott moved to recommend approval ofthe
preliminary subdivision citing the following conditions, findings, and conclusions:
Conditions:
1. Local access streets shall be constructed per the City's urban service standards, which
includes a 20' asphalt surface with ditches and a minimum 4' all weather surface walkway
I
separated from the roadway by the ditch prior to approval of [the final plat. Signage shall
be placed on all streets developed to low impact development standards indicating that
on-street parking is prohibited along both sides of the streets. 1 A' radii shall be identified
on Lots 7, 8, 21, 22, and 23, and open space area for tuming shall be located at roadway
intersections.
2. Street improvement to the Milwaukee Drive right-of-way along the frontage of the
subdivision shall be placed in accordance with the City's Urban Services and Design
Standards for arterial streetslbicycle routes that includes an 8' all weather surface
walkway and bike route. Street improvements from the intersection of Milwaukee Drive
from the westem boundary of the subdivision along West Tenth Street to "N" Street
connecting to the nearest improved street shall be made per the City's Urban Services and
Standards Guidelines that includes a 4' all weather surface walkway with ditches if
developed to the City's low impact development standards. Street trees shall be planted
on the fronting lots along West 10th Street per the City's Urban Services and Guidelines
Policy 3G.l 00 Street Trees and Landscaping.
3. Fire hydrants shall be placed and spaced as required by the City's Fire Department to a
maximum 1000' of separation distance. Wording shall be placed on the final plat and
recorded with the County Auditor upon filing of the final subdivision indicating that all
residences shall be fitted with residential sprinkler systems prior to occupancy.
4. Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground.
5. Prior to final plat approval, an 8 inch water service shall be extended to the lots as
required by the Public Works and Utilities Department.
6. Stonnwater plans shall be submitted for approval per the City's Urban Services Standards
and Guidelines and installed prior to final plat approval.
68
Planning Commission Minutes
July 14, 2004
Page 4
7. Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works and
Utilities Department.
8. Building address numbers provided by the City's Building Division shall be placed on the
final plat.
9. The applicant sball place a statement on tbe plat and make it known to all subsequent
purchasers oftbe lots tbat said lots are in the proximity oftbe William R. Fairchild
lnternational Airport and that the Port of Port Angeles does not warrant that tbese lots
will always be outside tbe lowest noise contour currently.establisbed for residential use.
10. The applicant shall provide a play area suitable for small children living in or visiting the
proposed residences or sball contribute to the development 9fthe City's undeveloped
park adjacent to tbe subject site per the approval of the Cityts Park and Recreation
Director.
Findings:
1. Preliminary approval is for the 33-unit subdivision submitted by Clark Land Office on
June 8, 2004, for Darrel Vincent identified as being Suburban Lot 46 within the Townsite
of Port Angeles and located in the 2300 Block of Milwaukee Drive extending to West
10th Street. The site is approximately 10 acres in size and is nearly square in
configuration.
2. Tbe subject property is identified by tbe Port Angeles Zoning Map as Single Family
Residential (RS-9) which allows a density of up to 6 units per acre. The proposed
drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 9,000 square
feet in area.
3. The purpose of the City's RS-9, Residential Single Family zone is a low density
residential zone intended to create and preserve urban single family residential
neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family bomes on larger than standard
Townsite-size lots. Uses that are compatible with and functionally related to a single
family residential environment may be located in this zone. Because of land use impacts
associated with nonresidential uses, few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and
then only conditionally. This zone provides for a variety in the urban land use pattern for
tbe City's single family residential neighborboods, following a curvilinear street system
of non through public and private streets with irregularly shaped lots, minimum 75-foot
front lot lines, and 60-foot rights-of-way for collector arterial streets in large rectangular
blocks and usually located in outlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable land.
4. Tbe subject property is identified as Low Density Residential (LDR) on the Port Angeles
Comprebensive Plan Land Use Map.
69
PIn/1I1ing Commission Minules
July 14, 2004
Page 5
5. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency at tbe time of development for streets,
water service, sanitary sewer service, and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element
Policy A.9) and should require concurrency at the time of development for solid waste
collection, stornlwater management, telecommunications service, and emergency service
(Capital Facilities Element Policy A.l 0). The proposal has been reviewed with respect to
tbe Comprehensive Plan and the following Comprehensive Plan policies are relevant to
the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A and
Policy A.2; Goal B and Policies B.1, B.2, B.3, BA, and Goal C; Transportation Element
Goal A and Policies A.3, A.6, B.1 0, B.11, B.14, and B.18; Utilities and Public Services
Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goals A and B and Policies B.1, B.3, BA,
B.5, B.6, B.7, and Goal C, Policies C.2, C.3 and CA.
6. Cbapter 16.08 of tbe Port Angeles Municipal Code (P AMC) sets forth local requirements
for the approval of subdivisions. Section 16.08.050(B)(1) P AMC provides that the
Planning Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written
recommendations of City Departments and shall either approve or disapprove the
submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a
period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City Department of
Community Development. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the
proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting. Said preliminary approval shall become
void unless a final plat is submitted and approved by the City within the five year period.
7. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the
uniform division of land within the State. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire
into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a
subdivision and detennine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the
public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys and other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes,
parks and recreation, playgrounds, and schools and shall consider all other relevant facts
including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for
students who only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served
by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can
make written findings that these provisions are made.
8. The Port Angeles Public Works and Utilities, Department of Community Development,
Parks and Recreation, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed subdivision. Their
comments and specific conditions have been incorporated into the Department's
recommendation. Water, power, garbage pickup, telecommunications, sewer, and
emergency services are available within acceptable standards to the site or will be
extended through conditions to the preliminary plat.
9. The subdivision will create three new interior access streets that must be developed to
City standards per the City's Urban Services and Standards Guidelines.
10. The site is currently served by Milwaukee Drive and West Tenth Street. Milwaukee
Drive is improved to one-half width but West Tenth Street is unimproved with a gravel
surface. Milwaukee Drive is an arteriaVQd a designated bicycle route but is not a school
PIn/1I1ing Commission Minlltes
July 14, 2004
Page 6
walking route. "N" Street (to the east of the area) is partially designated as a school
walking route. Improvements to Milwaukee Drive will be required such that the final
roadway is an improved width of 24' with a ditch and 8' pedestrian/bicycle path
established on the south side per the City's new suburban low impact development
standards. West Tenth Street from the Milwaukee Drive/Tenth Street intersection east to
the acceptable road improvement on West Tenth Street ( toward "N" Street) shall be
developed to the City's Urban Services and Guidelines Standards which will include a 4'
pedestrian path.
11. Using data provided in the Trip Generation Manual, 5th Ed. (Institute of Traffic
Engineers, 1991), a maximum of 320 average daily vehicle trips (ADT) may be generated
at full build out of the subdivision. Based on the 1989 "City and County Design
Standards for the Construction of Urban and Rural Arterials and Collectors", the
appropriate width for a minor collector with an ADT of less than 400 is 20 feet of paved
surfacing. Right-of-way for residential streets will be dedicated within the subdivision to
provide a minimum 20' improved roadway surface with a pedestrian walking path.
Adequate right-of-way exists within the existing 100-foot right-of-way for Milwaukee
Drive to complete a 24-foot asphalt surface with ditching and 8-foot walkinglbicycle
path. Approximately 2.16 acres of land will be developed as streets.
12. The City's low impact development standards for suburban areas were adopted in 2003
with the understanding that subdivisions developed under the reduced standards would
not allow for on-street parking. Site development and design for residential lots
developed under the lower impact standards need to accommodate resident parking and
visitor parking on-site. Roadside ditches developed under low impact development
standards should be kept free of debris.
13. The proposal was reviewed with regard to the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Section
16.08 P AMC) which provides specific design standards which are expected of
subdivisions within the City limits while the City's Urban Services Standards and
Guidelines indicates that street trees should be planted along arterial streets and provides
guidance for such placement and tree species. The design standards identified in Section
16.08.060 F P AMC state that street trees are a protection against excessive heat and glare
and enbance the attractiveness and value of abutting property. The City will assist the
subdivider in location of trees and species to use under varying conditions. It is
recommended that trees be planted inside the property lines where they are less subject to
injury, decrease the chance of motor accidents and enjoy more favorable conditions for
growth. If trees are to be planted within the right-of-way, proposed locations and species
to be used must be submitted for review and approval by the City.
14. There are no environmentally sensitive areas on the site. The site is flat and is not
considered a frequently flooded area nor is it listed on the Federal Emergency
Management Act (FEMA) maps which denote those areas that are within 100-year flood
areas.
15. The owner of a construction site which disturbs a total of five acres or more of land area
that has a discharge of stormwater to a iIilface water or storm sewer system must apply to
Planning Commission Minllles
July 14, 2004
Page 7
the State Department of Ecology for a General Permit for Stormwater Discharge
Associated with Construction Activities.
16. Building pennits are required for all structures within the subdivision. All local building
and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler
systems.
17. The Port Angeles School District has been notified of the development to allow them to
plan for needed public school facilities and routes. School busses travel along "N" Street.
Hamilton School is the closest school to the site.
18. Tbe City's Parks Department responded that they are aware of the preliminary proposal
and do not believe the level of service for the area will be hampered as a result of the
development. The City's LOS for parks and recreational sdvices is 1/3 acre for 1,000
population. An undeveloped wooded property donated to the City for a park use is
located on property adjacent to the subject site along "N" Street. The nearest public
playground area is located approximately one-half mile east (Crown Park) or east
(Lincoln Park).
19. The site will be serviced by the City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments. All
utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the
area. Transit service is available along "N" Street east of the site.
20. The City's State Enviromnental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance for the preliminary subdivision on July 9,2004, therefore satisfying the
City's responsibility under the Act.
21. The William R. Fairchild International Airport is located south of the site. Port of Port
Angeles staff has been notified of the proposed subdivision proposal and per agreement
with the Port, it is expected that those who purchase properties in the final subdivision
will be aware of the existing on-going airport operation.
22. The Planning Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The
Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval.
Reports are advisory only to ensure conformance of the proposed subdivision to the
general purposes of the City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and
specifications adopted by the City.
23. Property owners within 300 feet of the proposed subdivision were mailed notice of the
proposal and the property was posted on June 16,2004. Publication appeared in the
Peninsula Daily News on June 22, 2004. No written comments have been received to
date.
72
Planning Commission Minules
July 14, 2004
Page 8
Conclusions:
A. As conditioned, the proposed short plat is consistent with the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
B. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance,
Chapter 16.08 P AMC, and Cbapter 58.17 RCW of the Washington State Subdivision Act
C. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and
general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that
assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school.
I
D. As conditioned, signage educating residents and visitors as tb the prohibition of on-street
parking will ensure that interior streets remain passable for public safety situations where
on-street parking could prevent ease of passage for emergency vehicles and sight distance
safety issues.
E. The site has served as a drainage area over the years due to its topography. Clearing and
grading activities will require handling of the existing drainage and future stormwater
from the site as a result of development through the subdivision process.
F. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting of this subdivision as
articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The
subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles
consistent with the State of Washington Growth Management Act.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Rasmussen and passed 7 - O.
73
74
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Sue Roberds, Assistant Planner
DATE: July 14,2004
RE: Preliminary Subdivision - MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES
APPLICANT: Darrel Vincent
OWNER: BFV, LLC
LOCATION: 2300 Block of West 10th Street
PROPOSAL: Development of a 10 acre site located in the RS-9 Residential Single Family
zone into 33 residential building sites
RECOMMENDATION:
The Department recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of
approval of the preliminary 33-unit subdivision with 10 conditions, 22 findings, and 6 conclusions
identified in Attachment "A" to this report to the City Council.
PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS:
The property is described as being Suburban Lot 46 of the Townsite of Port Angeles and is
located in the 2300 Block of Milwaukee Drive. The site extends from Milwaukee Drive to West Tenth
Street with ingress/egress from both Milwaukee Drive and West Tenth Street. The 10 acre site is nearly
square in configuration and is zoned RS-9 Residential Single Family.
Properties east of the site are developed in compliance with the underlying RS-9 zone except
for a large property dedicated for a future City park site immediately adjacent to the subject site.
Several large undeveloped properties exist west and south of the site along West 10th Street and
Milwaukee Drive with one nearby property (5 acres) having recently been preliminarily approved as
a 12-unit residential subdivision. Properties to the north are developed as single family homes that
mainly front on the marine bluff.
The site has been logged following preliminary plat approval in 1992 and is basically flat. A
clearing, grading, and drainage plan must be prepared to address drainage issues and to ensure that no
net increase in drainage runoff will occur as a result of development of the site.
75
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 2
The site is served from "N" Street, West Tenth Street, and Milwaukee Drive. "N" Street and
Milwaukee Drive are arterial streets in the area with "N" Street (south of 10th Street) and West 10th
Street (east of"N" Street) being school walking routes. None ofthe streets are fully improved adjacent
to the site.
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW:
The Fire Department had no objections to the preliminary subdivision. The subdivision is
within the Fire Department's 4 minute emergency response time area. All single family
residences in new subdivisions shall be equipped with residential sprinkler systems. Such
subdivisions shall be allowed to have reduced requirements for cul-de-sac size and fire hydrant
spacing. Three new fire hydrants will be needed to serve the subdivision to be placed as
I
detern1ined by the Fire Department. Streets must be posted for no on-street parking if developed
to the City's low impact development standards.
The Utilities Division indicated that electrical plans and costs will be determined upon
approval of submitted plans. Approximate location for utility placement is 24' from the
platted center line. The City will be responsible for the following items:
Providing and installing conduit, vaults, sectionalizing cabinet, cable and related
equipment in the utility right of way.
Providing and installing padmount transformers and pedestals,
. Providing and installing street lights.
The owner/contractor will be responsible for the following:
. All costs of labor & materials provided by the City.
. Surveying, staking property corners, and cul-de-sac bulb radius identification,
bringing area to final grade, and trenching (24" x 47" depth x 900' +/-length) to
meet WAC Chapter 296-155N Excavation, Trenching, and Shoring
requirements.
All backfill and compaction, including street crossing on 14th Street.
. Coordination with other utilities for joint use of electrical trench (telephone,
cable, etc.).
The Public Works and Utilities Department had no concerns with the proposal but will
require that:
1. All public improvements shall be in accordance with the City's Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines.
2. Right-of-way as shown - 60' for the interior Jerri Lynn and Joshua Streets shall be
improved to suburban standards with 4' walking paths.
3. Required access street improvements are as follows: Tenth Street shall be improved
to suburban standards from the intersection at Milwaukee Drive with a 4' walking path
to "N" Street (the nearest improved street) and along the Milwaukee Drive frontage of
the site to minimum standards including an 8' walking path along the south side of the
right-of-way as it is also a bicycle route.
4. The following underground utilities are required within the proposed subdivision and
shall be coordinated with other utiVt(ss for joint use of the trench:
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 3
. 8" water main along western portion ofthe interior rights-of-way (approximately
13' from center line). Preference will be given for dual water service lines.
8" sanitary sewer main (approximately 5' east of center line) to be within city
right-of-way. Side sewer lateral connections are to be 6" pvc within city right
of way with a 10' horizontal separation from water services. Install 4" x 4"
pressure treated posts at each end of lateral, marked s/s and buried depth
indicated on post.
City persOlmel will install service and meters to lots being served off the line at the
owner's cost.
Fire hydrants must be approved by the City's Fire Marshall. Fire hydrants shall
confonn to City standards and will require approval ofthe City's water division
prior to purchasing /installation.
. StODn drainage/detention/ manholes are to be within City right-of-way or within
a 20' dedicated utility easement. Storm drainage from adjacent properties is to
be directed into the approved drainage system for this subdivision by way of a
dedicated 20' easement. All topographic contours must be labeled.
. Detention calculations are required.
5. Driveway culverts when installed will be restricted to 30' in length.
6. 10' corner radii shall be placed on Lots 7, 8, 21, 22, and 33 with open space area for
turning at roadway intersections identified on the final plat.
The Buildine Division commented that any private covenants more restrictive than the City's
development ordinances or the UnifoDn Building Code shall not be enforced by the City.
The City's Parks and Recreation Department noted that no new parks are planned for the
area or within the subdivision. Crown Park is a small neighborhood park located east of"N" Street and
Fourth Street, north of the subject site.
The Port An2.eles School District was sent a copy ofthe subdivision proposal and commented
that the proposal will have no negative effect on local area schools as the school population at present
is below capacity.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Property owners within 300 feet ofthe proposed subdivision were mailed notice ofthe proposal
on June 16,2004. The property was posted on June 16,2004, and publication appeared in the Peninsula
Daily News on June 22, 2004. No written comments have been received to date.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the proposal on July 6, 2004, which
satisfies the City's responsibility under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A).
77
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 4
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The site is located in the City's Northwest Planning Area which covers the western edge oftown
lying beyond Tumwater Creek and north of the airport. This area is comprised of larger suburban
homes.
The Comprehensive Plan establishes the long range goals and policies ofthe City. It is the basis
upon which City officials are to make land use decisions. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the
subject area as Low Density Residential. Any project proposed in the City must be consistent with the
goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
While the Comprehensive Plan was reviewed in its entirety with respect to the proposal, the
goals, policies, and objectives identified in Attachment "C" were found to be most relevant to the
proposal. I
ZONING ORDINANCE:
The Zoning Ordinance is the primary implementing ordinance for the Comprehensive Plan. It
establishes what types of uses are permitted and where they may be located in the City. It also
establishes minimum design standards for such uses. Like the Comprehensive Plan, any project
proposed in the City must be consistent with the regulations ofthe zone in which it is located. Pertinent
citations are noted in Attachment "C".
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE:
The City's Subdivision Ordinance (No. 1631), codified as Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code, has been reviewed with respect to the proposal. Although the entire ordinance has not
been cited, the development standards identified in Attachment "C" have been found to be applicable
to the proposal.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AL ANALYSIS:
The RS-9 zone purpose is to provide a low density residential zone intended to create and
preserve urban single family residential neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family homes
on larger than standard Townsite-size lots. The zone provides for a variety of residential uses in the
urban land use pattern for the City's single family residential neighborhoods.
The proposed preliminary subdivision sketch identifies three ingress/egress points: two from
West Tenth Street and one from Milwaukee Drive. All proposed lots within the subdivision are a
minimum of9,000 square feet in area. The subdivision consists of33 residential and 1 open space area.
Milwaukee Drive is an arterial street and an adopted bicycle route and will require improvement
to complete the existing one-half roadway width that currently exists and the development of a ditch
and an all weather 8- foot walkway along the south side of the street. The north one-half of the street
was previously improved during development of adjacent properties but prior to the City's suburban
road standards (2003). West Tenth Street is unimproved and will require widening with roadway
78
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 5
improvement and ditch/walkway improvement as described in the Public Works and Utilities
Departments comments..
Using data provided in the Trip Generation Manual. 5th Ed. (Institute of Traffic Engineers,
1991), a maximum of 320 average daily vehicle trips (ADT) may be generated at full build out of the
subdivision. Based on the 1989 "City and County Design Standards for the Construction of Urban and
Rural Arterials and Collectors", the appropriate width for a minor collector with an ADT ofless than
400 is 20 feet of paved surfacing. Adequate right-of-way exists to construct a 20' improved surface
roadway and a separated walking path with ditching within the existing 100-foot right-of-way for
Milwaukee Drive and 70- foot right-of-way for West 10th Street.
The City's Urban Services and Standards Guidelines states that street trees should be planted
on arterial streets, which in this case is only Milwaukee Drive, and provides direction as to the types
of trees and spacing. However, the City's Subdivision Ordinance Section 16.08.060(F) recommends
street trees for all streets including interior streets. Neither street is a school walking route.
Section 58.17.110 RCW requires a city to inquire into the publi~ use and interest proposed to
be served by the establishment of a subdivision. The City shall determine if appropriate provisions are
made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage
ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes,
parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds, and shall consider all otherrelevant facts
including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who
only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision. A
proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written findings that these
provisions are made.
The preliminary submittal has been reviewed with respect to subdivision standards required in
RCW 58.17.110. The site is served by City water, sewer, telecommunication, police, fire, and garbage
services. Although no new parks are proposed for the subdivision, a property donated to the City for
park purposes which has not as yet been developed as a park is located on property directly east of the
site on "N" Street. Crown Park, a developed neighborhood park, is located approximately Y2 mile east
of the area on West Fourth Street.
With conditions regarding improvement to local and interior access streets, utilities, and a
requirement for the development, submittal, and approval of drainage plans, the public interest and
safety is served.
Attachments:
"A" Findings and Conclusions
"B" Application
"C" Comprehensive Plan, Zoning, Subdivision regulations
79
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 6
ATTACHMENT "A"
Conditions, findings, and conclusions in support of the Mountain View Estates Subdivision
Conditions:
1. Local access streets shall be constructed per the City's urban service standards, which
includes a 20' asphalt surface with ditches and a minimum 4' all weather surface walkway
separated from the roadway by the ditch prior to approval of the final plat. Signage shall be
placed on all streets developed to low impact development standards indicating that on-
street parking is prohibited along both sides of the streets. 10' radii shall be identified on
Lots 7, 8, 21, 22, and 23, and open space area for turning shall be located at roadway
intersections.
2. Street improvement to the Milwaukee Drive right-of-way along the frontage of the
subdivision shall be placed in accordance with the City's Urban Services and Design
Standards for arterial streets/bicycle routes that includes an 8' all weather surface walkway
and bike route. Street improvements from the intersection of Milwaukee Drive along West
Tenth Street toward "N" Street connecting to the nearest improved street shall be made per
the City's Urban Services and Standards Guidelines that includes a 4' all weather surface
walkway with ditches if developed to the City's low impact development standards. Street
trees shall be planted on the fronting lots along West 10th Street per the City's Urban
Services and Guidelines Policy 3G.1 00 Street Trees and Landscaping.
3. Fire hydrants shall be placed and spaced as required by the City's Fire Department to a
maximum 1000' of separation distance. Wording shall be placed on the final plat and
recorded with the County Auditor upon filing of the final subdivision indicating that all
residences shall be fitted with residential sprinkler systems prior to occupancy.
4. Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground.
5. Prior to final plat approval, an 8 inch water service shall be extended to the lots as required
by the Public Works and Utilities Department.
6. Stonnwater plans shall be submitted for approval per the City's Urban Services Standards
and Guidelines and installed prior to final plat approval..
7. Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works and
Utilities Department.
8. Building address numbers provided by the City's Building Division shall be placed on the
final plat.
9. The applicant shall place a statement on the plat and make it known to all subsequent
purchasers of the lots that said lots are in the proximity of the William R. Fairchild
International Airport and that the Port of Port Angeles does not warrant that these lots will
always be outside the lowest noise contouatlrrently established for residential use.
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14,2004
Page 7
10. The applicant shall provide a play area suitable for small children living in or visiting the
proposed residences or shall contribute to the development of the City's undeveloped park
adjacent to the subject site per the approval ofthe City's Park and Recreation Director.
Findings:
1. Preliminary approval is for the 33-unit subdivision submitted by Clark Land Office on June
8,2004, for Darrel Vincent identified as being Suburban Lot 46 within the Townsite of Port
Angeles and located in the 2300 Block of Milwaukee Drive extending to West loth Street.
The site is approximately 10 acres in size and is nearly square in configuration.
2. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Single Family
Residential (RS-9) which allows a density of up to 6 units per acre. The proposed drawing
indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 9,000 square feet in area.
3. The purpose of the City's RS-9, Residential Single Family zone is a low density residential
zone intended to create and preserve urban single family residential neighborhoods
consisting of predominantly single family homes on larger than standard Townsite-size lots.
Uses that are compatible with and functionally related to a single family residential
environment may be located in this zone. Because of land use impacts associated with
nonresidential uses, few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and then only
conditionally. This zone provides for a variety in the urban land use pattern for the City's
single family residential neighborhoods, following a curvilinear street system of non through
public and private streets with irregularly shaped lots, minimum 75-foot front lot lines, and
60-foot rights-of-way for collector arterial streets in large rectangular blocks and usually
located in outlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable land.
4. The subject property is identified as Low Density Residential (LDR) on the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
5. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency at the time of development for streets, water
service, sanitary sewer service, and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9)
and should require conculTency at the time of development for solid waste collection,
stormwater management, telecommunications service, and emergency service (Capital
Facilities Element Policy A.1 0). The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the
Comprehensive Plan and the following Comprehensive Plan policies are relevant to the
proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A and Policy A.2;
Goal B and Policies B.1, B.2, B.3, BA, and Goal C; Transportation Element Goal A and
Policies A.3, A.6, B.1 0, B.11, B.14, and B.18; Utilities and Public Services Element Policy
C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goals A and B and Policies B.1, B.3, B.4, B.5, B.6, B. 7, and
Goal C, Policies C.2, C.3 and CA.
6. Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) sets forth local requirements for
the approval of subdivisions. Section 16.08.050(B)(l) P AMC provides that the Planning
81
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 8
Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written recommendations of City
Departments and shall either approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation
thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a period of 90 days after a preliminary
plat has been submitted to the City Department of Community Development. The City
Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed preliminary plat at a public
meeting. Said preliminary approval shall become void unless a final plat is submitted and
approved by the City within the five year period.
7. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the
unifonn division of land within the State. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire into
the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision and
determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety,
and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys and other public
ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, par~s and recreation,
playgrounds, and schools and shall consider all other relevant facts including sidewalks and
other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to
and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision. A
proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written findings that
these provisions are made.
8. The Port Angeles Public Works and Utilities, Department of Community Development,
Parks and Recreation, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed subdivision. Their
comments and specific conditions have been incorporated into the Department's
recommendation. Water, power, garbage pickup, telecommunications, sewer, and
emergency services are available within acceptable standards to the site or will be extended
through conditions to the preliminary plat.
9. The subdivision will create three new interior access streets that must be developed to City
standards per the City's Urban Services and Standards Guidelines.
10. The site is cunently served by Milwaukee Drive and West Tenth Street. Milwaukee Drive is
improved to one-half width but West Tenth Street is unimproved with a gravel surface.
Milwaukee Drive is an arterial and a designated bicycle route but is not a school walking
route. "N" Street (to the east of the area) is partially designated as a school walking route.
Improvements to Milwaukee Drive will be required such that the final roadway is an
improved width of 24' with a ditch and 8' pedestrian/bicycle path established on the south
side per the City's new suburban low impact development standards. West Tenth Street
from the Milwaukee Drive/Tenth Street intersection east to the acceptable road improvement
on West Tenth Street (toward "N" Street) shall be developed to the City's Urban Services
and Guidelines Standards which will include a 4' pedestrian path.
11. U sing data provided in the Trip Generation Manual. 5th Ed. (Institute of Traffic Engineers,
1991), a maximum of 320 average daily vehicle trips (ADT) may be generated at full build
out of the subdivision. Based on the 1989 "City and County Design Standards for the
Construction of Urban and Rural Arterials and Collectors", the appropriate width for a
82
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 9
minor collector with an ADT of less than 400 is 20 feet of paved surfacing. Right-of-way for
residential streets will be dedicated within the subdivision to provide a minimum 20'
improved roadway surface with a pedestrian walking path. Adequate right-of-way exists
within the existing 1 OO-foot right-of-way for Milwaukee Drive to complete a 24-foot asphalt
surface with ditching and 8- foot walking/bicycle path. Approximately 2.16 acre of land will
be developed for streets.
11. The City's low impact development standards for suburban areas were adopted in 2003
with the understanding that subdivisions developed under the reduced standards would not
allow for on-street parking. Site development and design for residential lots developed
under the lower impact standards need to accommodate resident parking and visitor parking
on-site. Roadside ditches developed under low impact development standards should be
kept free of debris.
I
12. The proposal was reviewed with regard to the City's Subdivisibn Ordinance (Section 16.08
P AMC) which provides specific design standards which are expected of subdivisions within
the City limits while the City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines indicates that street
trees should be planted along arterial streets and provides guidance for such placement and
tree species. The design standards identified in Section 16.08.060 F P AMC state that street
trees are a protection against excessive heat and glare and enhance the attractiveness and
value of abutting property. The City will assist the subdivider in location of trees and
species to use under varying conditions. It is recommended that trees be planted inside the
property lines where they are less subject to injury, decrease the chance of motor accidents
and enjoy more favorable conditions for growth. If trees are to be planted within a planting
strip in the right-of-way, their proposed locations and species to be used are to be submitted
for review and approval by the City.
13. There are no environmentally sensitive areas on the site. The site is flat and is not
considered a frequently flooded area nor is it listed on the Federal Emergency Management
Act (FEMA) maps which denote those areas that are within 100-year flood areas.
14. The owner of a construction site which disturbs a total of five acres or more of land area
that has a discharge of stornnvater to a surface water or storm sewer system must apply to
the State Department of Ecology for a General Permit for Stormwater Discharge Associated
with Construction Activities.
15. Building pennits are required for all structures within the subdivision. All local building
and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler
systems.
16. The Port Angeles School District has been notified of the development to allow them to plan
for needed public school facilities and routes. School busses travel along "N" Street.
Hamilton School is the closest school to the site.
17. The City's Parks Department responded that they are aware of the preliminary proposal and
do not believe the level of service for the area will be hampered as a result of the
83
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page I 0
development. The City's LOS for parks and recreational services is 1/3 acre for 1,000
population. An undeveloped wooded property donated to the City for a park use is located
on property adjacent to the subject site along "N" Street. The nearest public playground area
is located approximately one-half mile east (Crown Park) or east (Lincoln Park).
18. The site will be serviced by the City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments. All
utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the
area. Transit service is available along "N" Street east of the site.
19. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance for the preliminary subdivision on July 9,2004, therefore satisfying the
City's responsibility under the Act.
20. The William R. Fairchild International Airport is located south of the site. Port of Port
Angeles staff has been notified of the proposed subdivision proposal and per agreement with
the Port, it is expected that those who purchase properties in the final subdivision will be
aware of the existing on-going airport operation.
21. The Planning Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The
Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval. Reports
are advisory only to ensure confonnance of the proposed subdivision to the general purposes
of the City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and specifications adopted by
the City.
22. Property owners within 300 feet of the proposed subdivision were mailed notice of the
proposal and the property was posted on June 16, 2004. Publication appeared in the
Peninsula Daily News on June 22, 2004. No written comments have been received to date.
Conclusions:
A.
B.
As conditioned, the proposed short plat is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive
Plan and Zoning Code.
As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance,
Chapter 16.08 PAMC, and Chapter 58.17 RCW of the Washington State Subdivision Act
c.
As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and
general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure
safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school.
D.
As conditioned, signage educating residents and visitors as to the prohibition of on-street
parking will ensure that interior streets remain passable for public safety situations where
on-street parking could prevent ease of passage for emergency vehicles and sight distance
safety issues.
84
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14,2004
Page I]
E. The site has served as a drainage area over the years due to its topography. Clearing and
grading activities will require handling of the existing drainage and future stormwater from
the site as a result of development through the subdivision process.
F. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting of this subdivision as articulated
in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision
provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the
State of Washington Growth Management Act.
T:\SUB\Mollllwill View. wpd
85
MOUNTAIN V1EW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page I 2
ATTACHMENT "C"
Designation
The Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map identifies the site as Low Density Residential (LDR). Low
Density Residential allows an overall residential density of a project to range up to 9 units per net acre and
is intended to be for the development of single family homes. The following goals, policies and objectives
have been identified as being the most relevant to the proposed subdivision:
IV. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal A: To manage growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial to the community as a whole, is
sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals and is consistent with the State of Washington's Growth
Management Act.
V. LAND USE ELEMENT
Goal A: To guide current and future development within the City in a manner that provides certainty to
its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the challenges and opportunities of
the future.
Policy A.2: All land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council and/or any of its appointed
Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and its land
use map.
Goal B: To have a community where residential development and use of the land are done in a manner that
is compatible with the environment, the characteristics of the use and the users, and the desired urban design
of the City.
Policy B.t: Urban services shall be available for all residential areas as required by the Capital
Facilities Element concurrency policy.
Policy B.2: Single family lots should be ofreasonab1e shape and should have access provided by an
alley or by a local access street or a collector arterial.
Policy B.3: All residential developments should be designed with the provisions of fire protection and
service vehicle access as key factors in the street design and circulation pattern. For efficient circulation,
rights-of-way should be obtained and improvements made to further the grid street pattern ofthe City. Cul-
de-sacs may be pernlitted when designed as an integral part of the major grid street pattern of the City.
Policy B.4: All residential developments should be encouraged to preserve and capitalize on existing
unusual, unique, and interesting natural features, should preserve and utilize natural vegetation, should
utilize and preserve scenic views, should maximize southern exposures, should offer protection from
prevailing winds, and should be designed to minimize energy use.
Goal C: To have a community of viable districts and neighborhoods with a variety of residential
opportunities for personal interaction, fulfillment and enjoyment, attractive to people of all ages,
characteristics and interests.
86
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14,2004
Page 13
VI. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Goal A: To develop a coordinated, multi-modal transportation system which serves all areas ofthe city and
all types of users in a safe, economical, and efficient manner.
Policy A.3: The collector arterial streets and local access streets should serve primarily local traffic
with special emphasis on safety for pedestrian traffic.
Policy A.6: Planning for transportation services and facilities (including public streets, bikeways,
pedestrian walkways, and public and private air, marine and land transit services and facilities) shall
be performed consistent with the goals and policies of the Capital Facilities Element.
Policy B.IO: The City should complete the arterial circulation system for westside
development.
Policy B.II: New arterial streets, local access streets, dnd alleys should be designed and constructed
to conform to the Statewide National Functional Classification System for Federal Aid Systems,
WSDOT, and Transportation Improvement Board minimum design standards and standards as adopted
by the City.
Policy B.14: Off-street parking should be sufficient and accessible within business and residential
areas to ensure that the traffic flow of the street is not impaired.
Policy B.IS: Police and fire protection should be a key factor in residential subdivision street designs
and circulation patterns
VII. UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT
Policy C.2: All new utility services should be underground.
x. CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Goal A: To provide and maintain safe and financially feasible urban services and capital facilities at or
above stated levels of service to all City residents and the general public.
Goal B: To provide urban streets and utilities at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the
general public.
Policy B.I: All arterial streets shall function at an average daily level of service of D or better.
Policy B.3: The City shall not approve any development that is not served with water service at or
greater than the following level of service standards at the time of development: Single family units:
2 gallons per minute @ 30 psi ( fire - 1,000 gallons per minute @ 20 psi).
Policy B.4: The City shall not approve any development that is not served with sewer service at or
greater than a level of service standard of 300 gallons per day per person at the time of development.
Policy B.5: The City shall not approve any development that is not served with electrical service at or
greater than a level of service standard of 120/220 volts per service at the time of development.
87
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 14
Policy B.6: The City should not approve any development that increases a site's post-development
stormwater run-off beyond that allowed by the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound
Basin as adopted by the City.
Policy B.7: The City should not approve any development that cannot be served with
telecommunications service at or greater than the following level of service standards at the time of
development: telephone, residential: I service per unit / cable television, residential: I service per unit.
Goal C: To provide urban services at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the general
public.
Policy C.2: The City should not approve any development that will not be served with adequate transit
service as detem1ined in the comprehensive service and facilities plan for transportation within six years
from the time of development. \
Policy C.3: The City should not approve any development that will not be served at or greater than a
city-wide level of service standard of 9 acres of parks per I ,000 population within six years from the
time of development.
Policy C.4: The City should not approve any development that will not be served at or less than the
following level of service standards at the time of development: Police: 677 persons per one officer.
Fire: 4 minute response time or residential sprinkler system installation.
ZONING:
The Zoning Map identifies the site as Residential Single Family (RS-9). The purpose and intent of
this zone is as follows:
"This is a 10111 density residential zone intended to create and preserve urban single family
residential neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family homes on larger than
standard Townsite-size lots. Uses that are compatible with and functionally related to a
single family residential environment may also be located in this zone Because of land use
impacts associated with nonresidential uses, few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and
then only conditionally. This zone provides for a variety in the urban land use pattern for the
City's singlefamily residentialneighborhoods,jollowing a curvilinear street system of nonthrough
public and private streets with irregularly shaped lots, minimum 75-footfront lot lines, and 60-foot
rights-of way for collector arterial streets in large rectangular blocks and usually located in
outlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable land"
The minimum lot area is 9,000 square feet. All lots shall comply with the minimum area and dimensional
requirements as follows:
Front: 25 feet
Rear: 25 feet, except 1 0 feet for detached accessory buildings in the rear one-third of the
lot.
S feet, except 3 feet for detached accessory buildings in the rear
30 feet
30%
Interior Side:
Maximum Height:
Lot Coverage:
88
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 15
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE (No. 1631 as amended):
16.08.060 - Standards and Policies.
A. GENERAL STANDARDS. If a proposed street and/or lot pattern for any zone in Port Angeles has
been made by the Councilor the Commission, the street layout of any new plat submitted shall be in general
conformance to said pattern or plan. Otherwise proposed streets in new subdivisions shall conform to the
Comprehensive Plan and Urban Services Ordinance as adopted.
No plan for the platting, replatting, subdivision, or dedication of any area shall be recommended for
approval by the Commission unless streets shown therein are connected by surfaced road to an existing
improved public right-of-way adequate to serve the existing and new lots.
Where the Comprehensive Plan or the City's official street plan indicates the necessity of a new right-of-
way of a required width or portion thereof for street purposes, whether within a new plat or new subdivision,
or along the boundaries of a new plat, new subdivision or new lot, such required right-of-way or portion
thereof shall be dedicated to the City of Port Angeles by the filing of a plat.
The Planning Commission may require plats to provide areas for parks, playgrounds, open spaces,
recreation facilities, schools, school grounds, safe walking conditions on ~chool routes, transit stops, and
drainage ways.
Each proposed subdivision and the ultimate use of the land therein shall be in the interests of public health,
safety and welfare, and subdividers shall be prepared to present evidence to this effect when requested by the
Commission.
No Final plat of land within the force and effect of existing Zoning Regulations shall be approved unless
it is conforming with such Regulations.
Whenever there is a discrepancy between minimum standards or dimensions noted herein and those
contained in Zoning Regulations, Building Codes, or other official Regulations, the highest standard shall
apply.
B. GENERAL PRINCIPLES. POLICIES. The Commission shall ensure that appropriate provision is
made for: (1) the harmonious development of neighborhoods by requiring coordination of streets within
subdivisions with existing or planned streets, or with other elements of the Comprehensive Plan; (2) adequate
open spaces for recreation, schools, light and air; (3) distribution of population and traffic which will create
conditions favorable to public health, safety and convenience.
C. STREETS.
1. The arrangement, character, extent, width, grade and location of all streets shall conform with the
Comprehensive Plan, the Capital Facilities Plan, the Urban Services Ordinance, and the Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines, and shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned roads, to topographic
conditions, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed uses of the land
to be served by such roads.
2. Where such is not shown on the Comprehensive Plan, the arrangement of streets in a subdivision
shall either provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing streets in the surrounding area;
or shall conform to a street plan for the neighborhood, approved by the City, to meet a particular situation where
topographic or other conditions make continuance or conformance to existing streets impracticable. This shall
also apply to cluster subdivisions.
3. If a street plan for an area has been made by the City, the street layout of a proposed subdivision
in such an area shall be in general conformance to the plan.
4. When a portion of a subdivider's tract is to be subdivided, a street plan for the entire tract shall be
submitted to indicate how the street pattern ofthe plat submitted will coordinate with the entire tract when fully
platted and with streets in the sun-ounding area.
5. Where a tract is subdivided into lots or tracts larger in area than twice the minimum lot size, the
City may require an arrangement of lots and streets such as to permit a later re-subdivision in conformity with
the street and lot requirements specified in these Regulations.
89
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES Preliminary Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 16
6. Where a proposed subdivision abuts or contains an existing or proposed arterial street of is adjacent
to an existing or planned business, commercial or industrial district, the City may require treatment as may be
necessary (1) for the adequate protection of residential properties; and (2) to afford separation of through and
local traffic.
7. Where a subdivision borders or contains a railroad or limited access highway right-of-way, the City
may require a road approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way at a distance suitable for
appropriate use of the intervening land. Such distances shall also be determined with due regard for the
requirements of approach grades and future grade separations.
8. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles. Acute angle
intersection shall be avoided.
9. There shall be no reserve strips controlling access to roads, except where the control of such strips
is definitely placed with the City under conditions approved by the Commission.
10. Sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only
walk to and from school shall be provided pursuant to RCW 58.17.060 and 58.17.110.
E. LOTS.
1. The lot area, width, depth, shape and orientation, and the minimum building setback lines shall be
appropriate for the location of the subdivision, for the type of development and land use contemplated, and for
the type of street systems planned for the area, and shall conform with the requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance.
2. Excessive depth in relation to width shall be avoided. No lot shall have a depth greater than three
times its width.
3. Corner lots for residential use shall have extra width to permit appropriate building setback from
and orientation to both streets.
4. To ensure public health, convenience and safety, the subdividing ofland shall provide, by means
of a public street, each lot with direct access to an existing public street that is improved to City street standards.
5. Double frontage and reverse frontage lots shall be avoided, except where essential to provide
separation of residential development from arterial streets or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography
and orientation. A planting screen easement across which there shall be no right of access shall be provided
along the line of lots abutting such a principal arterial street or disadvantageous use.
6. Side lot lines shall be substantially at right angles or radial to street lines and front lot lines.
7. No lot or lots for residential purposes shall be divided or sold into additional lots or building sites,
without compliance with Title 16 P AMC.
F. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS.
1. Street Trees. Street trees are a protection against excessive heat and glare and enhance the
attractiveness and value of abutting property. The City will assist the subdivider in location of trees and species
to use under varying conditions. It is recommended that trees be planted inside the property lines where they
are less subject to injury, decrease the chance of motor accidents and enjoy more favorable conditions for
growth. If trees are to be planted within a planting strip in the right-of-way, their proposed locations and
species to be used are to be submitted for review and approval by the City.
S. SIGNAGE One (1) free standing sign no larger than twenty-four (24) square feet in area shall
be permitted for identification of the subdivision.
90
~
cO
~
C
.-:
~
.-:
U
. -:
>
rfl
C)
~
cO
+J
rfl
~
~
C)
.-:
>
o
.-:
cO
+J
~
~
o
~
'J~ ,~.~ '~"IJf:.. .~~. ~t (: ..:':~. ~,..:;.ll'~.' ~~. '~'f:lt:" . J ~!:.~~I'~:: ':.~.?:" '/.: I.:~. 2':l"::;-;~ .~.~;;';;i;<.~..jf.:.1t~~r.. ~~"$."-c';
Yl~ "~ -ti"f'~_ ~.;!:'~ .....:./.w ./!'i.:r:-.:';'I",', .:;j;"(;:" '..;li.'~'-/;. ..,I/;f;~_L'" '/./ .....;.... .J...:t;;.",.I. "'p....... (;.1""._..7,-... .~51.......,.ti;1z~ .
t' {~,.. '''I,:~:":~.",",!i..- ~~.."~". iJ,':..: 1:~~:.;.,1 "~:i'/':' if:~""~'J.}~l...~.r~:'...J /'" { :'<l"~ H ~;~~~'~".,,~.... "::At~:' ~~H~._:~. ~
. ~-(' .........'l..t::..,. :-..l~" ~ .. "...., ~.."" ..1 ", " ~.J- ........, . w~. ,j" . 'M ./. -/, . - ..,'~"'." It
J .l,"~~_~~...'lI.,J~^');y"~~...:;.r-it.... >t...~::.-:.r...~lv. ....-..'1ti-'I!.,-'.......,. -.~ '..i. ~ll\/ " ~'/'b"l' .~"-9...;~"':~"'~'7l~.. ... I'.
"...;t:.-'i:~:.....~...y}'~.}ll'N.....~/~~~..._~~..-:-~~I.. - _',..-:t . .' "'_- ,'.Ii' \:,._~.';... J.1i;,~~.~...~r..- ~/;i....*""^
.,,~..~'-'-'...':".~-.....'f<1X -~...._""..i'; -,(~, --....{..'~- ..,1 h~ t- {~...l'f.-.?:).a. ,'~ -~.yr." r!~ ^-11~"'.~" "ff"',a
\ ~ . ,~p::;f~' .;~t~~ -~~::~.~<.~ <~~~~"~;7..~' ~~l:tl "f~.~ ..}~~C._, ";. : t.... ~..~'::~.. ~j~l::~.- ::,: ~1r~~'" I=.::~"';~.~~~ ~:+~;~~:l.J . ~;..
: \ .,. ~..'.f. -'.- ",..r))'~~....~ 'I?)t. .;P'~~:':I'1 \ "'l't'::~i"-~.t".' l~'''_"i.t.... ". ~~ ~... ';il".-..1: :I.."'\C... i?
1i ,. ... _'.1':~. ~. ~-_",.~;I:-< ....,r:-~:. _ji.:I~"" ~~~.-...l",~.I. {'...,~~'V t>. l~^' _ ~?jv... \,. -...t' _ '''''. if . -...- .'V::'i"......~-.:.~
, .' 1~IA ..tr- -i,JI."'r'..~'-.1""'"' ~*...I..;._~~! -Il .. ~l'I~~'A i.~ v~,:,'L (_-~~:f,_ ....-..... "';if~^-f-~ -,o:.ll=-< .~'-
.'.~. ~:'i ~-_..r'i'~..l...:-"*~ .;.y/-..--i/t.J;:.:.'n.....IC~I. 'N~,...~'--; .: -.:. '.:,,:'/l '-:'~":'.~,-: '':...':-;'''''1~:'' "......if ~-~~....~"'M;4~ ~
; ", ,;,1.-,: ...~-"..."".~.*, '. '~" ~''''''.~ / '..' ". ......i. <: ~~'!I .... '';1j~' -<4-'" ....~".)",;z: '~f;
'j . .>.,::,.);'/~,:i""'./;t~";$~~)}~~;;J.:~; jl~:~~~"". '>.i ..t::~~~k;./~~.:i},l: l~..,;:-'e~).!;~f.~tf:<~il:
'I' ""'J{t" :';':'\ .,--;1..~'..''-I'.'f';.-:~;/., ~'c +.~< ,i .:';::;;.:~"" .... i,e.::;,,',' '.,:;'t:~..' t' "Y~':l 1~.;;:,.,,;;J'.,.';.ll',
t'-~~.I' :.~: "_.,~:{-,.,..:-.. ~.,~,.:o:;;:Z . :'~h>;t /,~..::.~;::;:.:,.< l::=''-1/ {:-:~ \~.cJ. ,.~ -'-'*': '-':~:;. ....;,..- -..../~>.;:.
1,\ "I "l.-.I~t, ':'" ./l.,"':=..;~<;~...-.,;>-.,.... ,'....: f,~.~.~.'-j"..i}'..... I.'-~:;t'!.....~~"<:..\::.\',.. /.' "~:t'~'... -L. -:':: . ),,~
~-=~' :-:J~~::~~iE~:':):c~ .~>{1~.~r%~;:,~~~:.~~:>~~t~!~t~~~:~ ,..,(~>-?,:...' /' ;#}:~;~.~''';*~~''i(~~;~:~' .~.~~j;
r- ",.I j,'.. .,.r... '. . )";I!.. .oJ'" >~'" ~".i"'" ....,...>. (-- "'. .l':. '~>;"".;r." ~ry;t ....~,.,..71.'l V'" "lie
;~.:31 ~~':{i:~::~.' . 'v\>.,-'l../ ::~):.:...~t?\:{.~. ,: ,:.....:...f!&.~\~~i~.:;~te : .,:::.~.~;::~~~.~~~~t
i ,.< .;lll~ ::ti "-.,," '-'';'!.,.; ,~~. .-i. ".'''' ,'! '..:~i;:..:$,:,~tf...: '. -.,-.t:.;f!:"._~
'. '.'i.:'" il'.'- . c' .-;, "~l'. ,-", ....., ..,~ ""::"C /..... .... ""'.:
\ ....j;:~L~;2~~/ ,:~:~<;,.)< :'~.,.~~.,::~..",:.~~:~~t.}~::;~:..~:~::..i><. ...~~;f~i~~.k..... ,<::::...~?~
,,/i.'. .,......'~;... ,.' :,~~..~." ". ".!:li'?",,: ......./ ~"'.~/l .J,_,,,,~~~.l
: ':/1)/..",( '/:::~;~'''l.~, >...'?/'.' .r-:~>::~,,:. .~.. ""_;'" ? .r,.1 '" / /- .f:','.~Jf.(,,'
< ./"",,/ '~"."'..-;' V~N.~.:::._~ '~.l...... (' ~~, . ref:, ...... ."~ l"",:', } / \........I~. ~".-......'~f~/
j '~'.' lllll~. ~"" ki~...... "'~l' -", ~~. ;.'~r';! . .H, ";i.::{; > -.,.... ." ...' ,#-~ ~~\
'l, .'.1; l~ll....",~r . t~_' t-.."O-..I~.;.-:....~ 't......~ 1"'"' ~ l~. .~~.~.}Ir "'~t.... ~._"~~-?"::v~" ....-.-.. ",/ .l' } .~~>~':~1.,:
I.... l / Lv" . l_l "".r:-; 'II;~. t..f..., ~f-i.~:;."t...... , ~,,~ ~ -. " . I' J ~ "<~::~'L:;;.1It'"
[.';, :I~>' "'".::r!/ ~~<...~~"",/')<- flI...~',;t,.. '';' ~".:;...~ "".. "iJF ..... .:.... / " ./. .-,
. ."~ .'~ __~.. .'., ~ ~ .r ~:;;. 1..J;. J,: ~ .. > (' ..
,/ -;.; ~(" ~ ';t/ ":-~}~.,:.~.l~._:.-;..r:l .......~.r..~' :1' . / }'" ,\' ~L~....> "'t+;._
;-..11 "', . ""'!," ...,?.... ..;(1'. ... ....il... ;- ..fijl.'. .//.. ".' :'., "'.
:--'11 i~<,J ~it"'.~~?:;;.*'./,:.~~:..:-':,. ,!" jf;1S' .-L.' ,..., ,.' '
:-.::: ~~~.w- . /'~~. ~",..~.J::;:-:~ _i",' f.,...."'.. /1' ....".' ... "'<J .'.
... , I~ I.,/!/' "''- .....' '. l ." " ,..... .' "- "', "'-
, 1 Ii, ~."".~ '.~."~ . N ...I<r "' ,. t..... '.,
'l. .,.~; ..... ~"'>.<{;:l ; '-~r?,:. "", {. ,;,,' '" ~ 'we::
i "\" ......,:', '... '""," "'w' .... .."'tf"....;, '-,.[,.1. ':'''J'.J Jl' '\:,. ':~
't- -.... 'I ~ ' . ;.-. .I""'~'~" .;;Z:o::....,'_ ''?11'"'' ~ ~ ''J~'' ..fJ;~' " '.' ' .
;--.~ ~+f r'. ..{ ;."""",., /t """ -, ..~'S!.:.;~' '-~ -:: "::r~;.:~~~"<' "~r~~..~:.:(....t . ." '. :~w
r--' ~_i~l< ~-~'" {~. -;,,',r..~:.~,..;,,~...,~/lt.::"? ;,:..;.::".;....j5"4'.-"(.J \;: .... p". :r-::r--=-~~~J~'~' /"':~/ ",!:~'f9-
.--- "" "" ,'.', ..;;.... .~..;" fl~'" ~" .. ~..' f.... '. .~"""'<'1i"'" ... ,."'v.....'tf'
.;" ,_.~.~~.. ~ I .. "~~ :2' 4'l...t_... '!rc~:_..v, /i~_)~I!"'.~~~. .,I'~ ~...;~r.. ')~' ".)' )~:;.l."
{ ::.._~..:.' 1'1.."./, ~ '.: .o\;~, .... .... I!I}"':'"""", ~ .1.1'1' . ::::";.~ ..J...~'.l '"i\~",.~,,,, .' ~::'. /"J.~
, ,. _:~I( :"~'" '.... ~~ :.~' xs.,.-<<t!!,.. -::'" "-,,<> ,...... ..zl..:.. '-::;-'- '~'('
V'"' ,.._, '~I."'..._ '.. ... - _ v..." .":. /, ", ~.....lf("" "'.., J' ,--l-; ,~ .. ",
k""""--- :W""n; I~ ,\l')l.p;r>...~... ......~ '- ~,.",,/....\ ..,f'.l/ ""'" ~<<.~"'-:4""'i.} ~r / .~,~...~/
L ..",,--. I j;"IJ{ If t:~ l......... . ?;f..,.F- w~"i:^' ~'-';-~'J/ 'v I'!-J " .\;.:.,
r::-:' ---~, \ .. ..( \,.( ""-c,.,.. a::l" ;;r-;: l::"~~i;/ /r~/i-.-.:...>~.:.::t/?
I ...,r';'>\ 't,.. .""~'" ~', ,')~. ':, ,. .\' ,.... :i.. f!'"':~/fj/.'.;IP~......- r
?-==: \ ~.'~::... " f.;\.. \\, i.:;'ii~;,.., " .'~:~,/t". -'. """"'" .' ,:?~~::~~,:~..:?~~1=~~ :"l . . -:~.
!-"....~_, t I . ....... ~;t ~(i ~.... ...-;....~ -:tJ -/!;~I'" "'..}i~'~:.,tltl"~ '- )..... - J ~'-': '.. k ~ t'~ k.
! ' ~' .... '_" 1: .fi.:~/ ^~.'_ ~J~ ,Y',. ,.../ ". { j_ t' ~ /r-!;,. '_ \'" ~~" ~>>/ ':"~.., h. ...
r-.:;~~~ t~.I,t, !l./j ~'-. '..h,lj '>"~"'I:~ '-"'J~':lI, . -::. t~'b' ''''.. } / ....z. ~,,~".">.I-;...._..,.'74+-....~"i/' I.~;;"'~'''''''~-~<:''
, ;;.;J'" 1 "" '.. ~......t"l."" ) .,..~~-- ~ ...."..... ~>..' . . #<'- ...r.1. ( - ....1'
t'-----( /"p,"" ft"lil .........~( ...."".. ,II . ,,,"""'-..~'l"i..... .......~ / / f"-~ f.,.., t: v/ -"'-'l~:
r-'_~~t ;~'. ~~l\l: A' :~~;:'-O~~ :_{.l.~\.{:~~~~~~~~..,... }'.~~:.. !"~~ ':'~~.~~.-.~'.:f., .~~~'
I., ' ' . ...1']-:.,.... I, v, I '. '-:-~7.4i .,.,.J.....'>tJ.'.fJ...'.~. {~~ "-- ./.... "'" ',,,r -"',: :i".l~{~:
". .~'",," 'I 1 . '....... . ,(I." ....' 'f.. ..., " " ~,'... ,. ~1f
I /\l.::~........t~~~~ III . , I ..~.:~~_<.~{I... .'''..-.:.-._~...../ ....'../ ,k "';,...... ?,Ll:~t/
II,/'l . .._(/ '" . '(0.'_ !f.::J I . ")1-}~:;... ",.} ,:.' .:<,.(IL')........ A:""~~~{'"
~ ..... i /~ ...~:-':~"'.. .r.r.:r' ... /"-.~ ',,-- f..../ r oJ l-,.I."': I
( I l(~ "". l ,,~ J;I.IT' / }''if'"~'~f''' . ,./'....4 l-t--r" ....,..~ j/f.l' l)
.......,.,;' 9,-, II -"k, .1/ . "''''~' )"-::'l~~ ,., ':1..:'';-... .1--.) r".::..0.' :l
t ....... / ;""', I J ~ -.. f' " '- .... j: ~"''''''''' ....: "~" '~'^J'j(~'",.l "';"';~ ,,~ l )~
i .......... lj\il. i -.-......, .// ~I';..._../ ......_. :'~:-'::;;'~!Ir-.)'::Jl ~~~..~~;,I '':'-''~'"<''''' J
I .,..,..../ ',\\.1 A?~~4~ ..,...>~.~../ .:~~::1::~:;~-{)--.:.._ ,3r'Y '--"" /$'
I /..........,... 1,t,.1,)' ft'i..l/,i~~"'~'.t=~ .'...... '/{ll(.......'./....r( .~~..!::} r....l.I~* ./' ....~ '. t/
~' '- I II ~'v'}.f0" ~'~"'f$..;-JJ .......' ~ " .....-\ ;..:-. .-:-.."" ,i'')I.' fl' '.
. t' -,,,, 1 , ~' .) ~,<.!... l . .t. '" ";"....~./-.."'.o-' ;::;.....::;..':.....//l 1'" _,,-::..,.~.1
.r' P ,:, ..... ,..>~~...~, /A.' ........* r -.' ........r.:. .;~- ~ - i "rr
~--.,,/ 11 ?11~. /~?< -~~;;(~_;/~=;:-:~~:-t! ~(-'R~~.I~~'" ~ ~........._~'::-~_JI:::'~
,.. ....~ ,~ "t"/ ....-}I.~ ~'l::'.:._".:.,~." t.......t.}.,...f':~--:..r.J''f/ ~_~r=T.~ .':~
1"'<"'( \\'Ilj....... J,<l~. ..:':..~Sd~..?-/-....:.~~f't'. '~~'I J' . .,,-:jJz,f,'J.fr-.... ". .
L 'J-. .......... !~'i-...~. "<. .. ~'..... .1:';-:~~;~j /........~,I~ ...,....-.J '-- il -'-.::~
I ,.,.' ""'<'>'''' -' 1~.ll ,.._,........, ;:;:;.' '" .(.."=<::Z{.j..s~~' ...-" _---""~' . II ,.""'''
I .i -~" '.... ./ F,l'. .../." "" If..'J -~.1 -~---", If i
... "_ ,..,,ll _,\ .t,~. .I ~~~1 ,_ ..~~~. ~ I t
~/ ..'..".. ."" \\1, ,y"~'~~ if,":~~~." t~~~< r . ./,. ..j.l../ /
1:'-"" -'L.".. i<>""""-.=.:.~~I".. /:~,. ;~~ >,:~~...I li' ,l:1' ':",..,...:~'..,.,.. /:/ ,/..-'--
91
rJJ
Q)
~
-.l-l
rJJ
~
~
Q)
. 'I"""'l
>
~
. 'I"""'l
ro
~
S
o
~
Q
'7
.-c.
p
Q
Q
~
~
~
'$
C)
-.l-l
. 'I"""'l
rJJ
92
. .
\J:J
Cl)
. ,.....01
~
. ,.....01
~
. ,.....01
~
~
\J:J
Cl)
~
~
\J:J
~
~
C)
. ,.....01
>
~
. ,.....01
ro
~
@
o
~
llf"'T.l ' I ,/ ""<. /~ )4-; -~~..- ,/ "-. /;;~
~ I~" l f"-A<,.' ~ " / t. "",.{
.' f,.. 'i 77'.,/- Y / .~:~( ,.(/?-",,-,-,,~
.""._ I- :q "'~i'./ .. -..., ll,/ ',...:........:.~ .
.~.--1~ \~ . ~;p:--v:tl/----~<.-~~ ;;i
II ,<::-~,)-,/ ~'<,\'~>' ~7"",. ,/./' / --~" ,.~, ,.<::::~
I I"', " .. ". )>Jtth "'::', / ".,
t'''' ""~rN"'.....~'/ l '""~f--< - '.,.. !f:.l
l t "'. ' ""'" i....
I I ;/
! .~;.'l//
I .', /.1
" I " (
! /' .,
ly~', ---~.....---!..'....
-01 \~-_.......-- // -'....>.,..,
~. \ ~ ! '
~"l. '\ / ." """'...........~
l'~~'i'\. ,..
I <.', ./
I ..'., (
I \. ,/
[. I
\ \, ,
~l ,yr
_A /{
.'
\ ../
\ ,,/
\.' \Vi/'
I \1
~ \1
\ 1~1 \,
..."...., " \"""',
r- ! N~N
I ~ t ~.
-.....-----~."--\,, ~l \. . -------:--.<.
\jr "I "'"
\--\. ~"~ \ ""
I 'I
, I
\~- "
-,~-"', \
\~_- ,I I
\ ,I ~
~ ~\ \
,---~-~\-""'-~rl , \,
~- ~--1 ~ \
.-~---- ..----- 11 J ~\ t
/\ -\ (.\'~
_j -_--- I f\l("'"- I
-~ \ \\\
.__----\ t.ir\
-,- l-----[~':':\ \"
_---! ': I
,--:;;-;;::02: ::...---~ \. -'I
!:
/.
, 'll/',
.../ ./lfi'
-""'>..,. / V
~.....~. ,/ / II
.--. ! / i
'.' /
/< t'
/' ~ .{
/'/// /~~;/ .....--~.....~. '.
il}
;' jf" .'
j " )
... .-' ,-.
J!" '-, /'/^
ii,>"
,/ .-.. /-".
J/tl:'</i ~, -.
/ -,' /
./ ,-' (f)
.. I'
1" ,., ,/",/
ll/ff" -,
1/ ,i ...
, ..'./ '\
,/i~~lrl \
('I{ """ \
/ f",;" \
,/~ ~/ _"..'''' _ "-....v.." II,
~ ~
Cl)
Cl) ~ Cl)
~ ~
~ ~ . ,.....01
~
~ Cl) ~
Cl) ~ Cl)
~ ~ \J:J U
0 ro ~
~ ~ ~ ro
r./J ~
N,..~
'~'--'
......
.......,
~
.......,.-.-.
....-.~N
93
II/I
/~
! .
i
1/"
{
/
.'.
'-'.
".......
'.
'.
"--.
/'""
/1 .~.......
/l' ......,......,
..'
M.........,.
('
"
,
"~,..
94
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
FOR OFFICE USE:
4~ "
Date Rec'd: rg /OJ:!
/
File #: SUB
ReceiverU .
APPLICA TlON
Inv. II:
Al)PLlCANT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT: flu..?'",/ 117 t1/1c:e/-Z1
ADDRESS: '/11 J3 r~_hf sf 1/'1 II"'J e~~
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: ~Dd-P'/'~/ 1/; rU'~? /1/
Cfr'1 1f""'.I'i/ Ie 5
.' /
i,L,e,
;?I'~ / . ) u</
j~r /'j-;S?k5~A /t' 5hZ-
ADDRESS:
11/ J3
FJr~ n f
.
PH. II: ~s' 7 '-/)~5'~
14J~ 1f";'J? 2-
PH. II: Jj 57,.. t".y""
'1 Y l' (;'2-
/.J~
5"/
PROPERTY OWNER (If other than applicant) B F t/
/
,r/II c;7 I .-;--- /' c' '
ADDRESS: ,U L c-'~~7" i-'rL9/Z";/
[
JROPERTY INFORMATION: J ~ -d.'
Property address: :2.$ tJ cj t,,)
-d, -I J11 J/ ;U,A ~J ~ ~ j)~.. ~<I
General location: ILJ
, ,
Legal description: <:. /. L tf I~ l' FA.
Property zoning: J!5tf ,
~ ..-'
j tJ IJ (f~S "
Existing site areas: r..
Proposed site areas: ' ..
,", .
Streets;' J / ~ Z fI '-, ;.
Acreage in: Parks " . . Other non-residential land uses
,.
Method of providing: Potable Water: (! , I if Sewer: I!,I#
/O~ / . k /.
Streets serving site: , ~ )?1,/kJLi ee'
,
I (WE) HEREBY CERTIFY that I (we) am (are) the owner(s) of the I (WE) HEREBY CERTIFY that I (we) am (are) the applicant(s) of the
above-described property and request that the proposed subdivision be above-described property and request that the proposed subdivision be
approved. It is understood that wilful misrepresentation of the information approved. It is understood that wilful misrepresentation will terminate the
will terminate the application. application,
Signedlt~/~pL/ Signed
Signed: Signed:
Date: ~/? /p[/'o 95:
.Jun_J.6-0412:19
Clark L~nd Office
360-Gr.--..-5310
P..02
5UBURBIIN LOT 46, TOWNSITE
r....' 1\} i /1 AA /...../..)/ it..l i 'y.
l~J_r.LL-"'-'JV' ........'-...1./..,' 1
I~J","""1 ,,1. l/'-iO" 1
vv/-I .::) I ! I! V L' / t I V
- '>( I
~----~
b~ ~ ~ WJ~r I
___ I
J i I,L '. -I ~ "0" /, I
_ ~ 'V i ~~ L.LV~
CITY OF PORT ANGEL ~S I
_. D~pt. of COln,~unity Develop enl !
PRt.LlMlfJARY
PLAT FOR:
1\110 [llVT AIN
1/fFHl
~~ .1,
.0 J') CJ .ll
Sr.AII IN fcrr
..-....-....
/...--
---.........
--..--.
-.--
....................-..
NO US:
'. 0('(" ~PACF C1"'NLH~.HlP = nr)4J[OWNFR"
0" . (11'[101 $PACF ^L~L ""'0 rOP FvTIJR[
...,",R RrrrNnCJN ,0.1'/....
;;. ,.:t.~'1VLN''''L ~INGL' '.AlJff Y (RS!J /UNJNG)
JUNE Hi, 2004
5HlCT OF 2
I.fC[~D:
'I'i;~ "F."vl!~ PflOPOSfO m>;[ Hr-""",,,,T
)ill _.._ O,.,.,Ort"S r:X1SIIHC: ;;.I'J'JJ7JJi't' ~[rfrR JltJE
_ .~~~ ut.:/'JCJTC$ [~IS7IWC ......TrR fiNE
.---
1
. _1<0. llo. :1U
.~ H ~l~. "WI:.
:;._.....,.... UIJI";
. l';..\lj ...-~,'"
...J1-.....1:1,;U~
IUI &1'.'111
96 ..' OJ
, .um'S'~\F.."'1lHc.
.....F-fIN!:;
DtVL.l~WrH' c:nJo/~.llNC .
COWS"TRlJ( nolol ....-..h^G(...c...~&
F.A.'.(JtJN-Ot.W)
....-' I!!'''l .Jr.6
~
g. a . 01
~
Existing Condition # 2
Street improvements to the Milwaukee Drive right-of-way along the frontage of the
subdivision shall be placed in accordance with the city's Urban Services and Design
Standards for arterial streets/bicycle routes that include an 8' all weather surface walkway
and bike route. Street improvements from the intersection of Milwaukee Drive along
West Tenth Street toward "N" Street connecting to the nearest improved street shall be
made per the City's Urban Services and Standards Guidelines that include a 4' all
weather surface walkway with ditches if developed to the City's low impact development
standards. Street trees shall be planted on the fronting lots along West 10th Street per the
City's Urban Services and Guidelines Policy 3G.100 Street Trees and Landscaping
Option 1 Amendment
Street improvements to the Milwaukee Drive right-of-way along the frontage of the
subdivision shall be placed in accordance with the city's Urban Services and Design
Standards for arterial streets/bicycle routes that include an 8' all weather surface walkway
and bike route. Street improvements along the site frontage extending East on West
Tenth Street toward ''N'' Street connecting to the existing chip sealed street shall be made
per the City's Urban Services and Standards Guidelines that include a 4' all weather
surface walkway with ditches if developed to the City's low impact development
standards. Street trees shall be planted on the fronting lots along West 10th Street per the
City's Urban Services and Guidelines Policy 3G.100 Street Trees and Landscaping.
Option 2 Amendment
Street improvements to the Milwaukee Drive right-of-way along the frontage of the
subdivision shall be placed in accordance with the city's Urban Services and Design
Standards for arterial streetslbicycle routes that include an 8' all weather surface walkway
and bike route. Street improvements along the site frontage extend East on West Tenth
Street to ''N'' Street shall be made per the City's Urban Services and Standards
Guidelines that include a 4' all weather surface walkway with ditches if developed to the
City's low impact development standards. Street trees shall be planted on the fronting
lots along West 10th Street per the City's Urban Services and Guidelines Policy 3G.100
Street Trees and Landscaping
.&12 ~
5~o1
....-
.."
Sl68
'D.>
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FORT,ANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
August 3, 2004
ClTY COUNCIL
SUE ROBERDS, ASSISTANT PLANNER
LUDWICK - PRELlMINARY SUBDIVISION
DEL GUZZI DRIVE
Summarv: A proposal to develop an 11 unit subdivision on an approximately 5 acre site in the
RS-9, Residential Single Family zone.
Recommendation: The Department of Community Development recommends that the City
Council concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the Ludwick
preliminary subdivision citing the Planning Commission's recommended conditions, findings, and
conclusions in support of that action.
Back~round / Analvsis:
Following a public hearing conducted on July 14,2004, the Planning Commission moved
7-0 to recommend approval of the Ludwick preliminary subdivision with conditions relating to
access to two abutting landlocked properties per Section 16.08 P AMC. The subject property is
located on Del Guzzi Drive near the intersection with Lindberg Road. Two of the proposed lots
border Lindberg Road and will require a dedication of right-of-way in order to allow the minimum
60-foot width for Lindberg Road in that location. Del Guzzi Drive is improved with curb and is
paved. Design of the lots recognizes the unique development issues of the property and, given the
topographic issues ofthe area, are larger than the standard 9,000 square foot lots allowed in the RS-9
zone. Standards with regard to lot width to depth ratio, street and utility development, and
residential and emergency vehicle access issues have been reviewed and meet the City's standards
for such development as conditioned.
Staffs report and an excerpt of the Planning Commission's minutes are attached for your
information.
,/ . -/f} ,.
t ,,)',<, "-- /;,', ,'~,- ) . /-,
'\ . )/ / ;/ .(;)1' . t f'~'.' ..>< .,
.' .......... ..... /
1;ue Roberds, As~'Stant Planner
Attachments:
Conditions, Findings and Conclusions
July 14,2004, Planning Commission Minutes
Department Report
97
98
J.JII.)i'\Ol&OJVoDtG:: :-nro G3.JV~Wdt:lOJNI
t15Ct-LIt jOK'~......:I S3.l . Z
'DOO-Ht (00<) "NOH' Y DOSS\!
urae n. Os:;1XlH'l' lWOc'
<I "3l5 ':IS ,00"","" ." '/I JIAON3
trOgi Xl 'mlil!.3Tlo~
13NNOB3nlB 51!:!;
>lJI\IOnl 10/l..:J ON.. /'I"mlll
:jN)n:l
" t
~ ~~
~ " ~~ !i1
~
o
"-
~ ~
Ui
uJ
'"
~ E
lJ101.Y1 NO!SJA10SDS lJ:lYNlJAJI131ld
:z ~
B
tl '0
0
15 ..,
l!'
- ffi
~ ~"'~ '0
qhgU 0
(L 0
l >- =:I 4( "'" _ ~ 0
<( ~rr~!N>-~:l '"
c ~ H;;;~ q
2 ~glll~~8~~ :
~8~~;~i~ ~
>- ~ c: ~ ~ ~ !if lf1 tI1
_~m13u~IH\ .. .0
f- a II I' i Gl 0
i:J I 0
- ~ I II u
z Ul
II I
U II · Ii
> I . : 0
I! II i
I!
l\
100
CONDITIONS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE LUDWICK
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION:
CONDITIONS:
1. Drainage and utility easements shall be shown on the final plat.
2. Stormwater drainage improvements shall be installed or bonded per the City's Urban
Services Standards and Guidelines prior to final plat approval.
3. Residential fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in each residential unit as required by the
Fire Department for all new residential building permits. Notice of this requirement shall
be placed on the final plat and recorded separately with the plat.
4. Electrical utilities shall be installed as needed by the applicant or shall be bonded per the
Public Works and Utilities standards prior to final plat approval.
5. Address numbers shall be identified and placed on the final plat as provided by the City.
6. Access easements or boundary line adjustments in favor of landlocked properties adjacent
to Lots 5 and 6 shall be recorded and shown on the final plat. An additional 1 0' right-of-way
shall be dedicated for Lindberg Road along the frontage of Lots I and 4 and shown on the
final plat.
7. Erosion control measures shall be in place prior to grading and construction.
FINDINGS:
1. The preliminary plat application includes a drawing dated received June 10,2004, prepared
for William and Carol Ludwick by Zenovic and Associates and used as the basis of the
preliminary plat review. The final plat will be entitled Ludwick Subdivision. The City of
Port Angeles acquired the subject property through a foreclosure on unpaid assessments for
Local Improvement District 211 which was sold to the Ludwicks.
2. The preliminary plat subdivides the 5 acres ofland into 11 residential lots. The residential
building lots range in size from 9,290 to 21,430 square feet in area.
3. The proposed subdivision site is located along Del Guzzi Dr. between Lindberg Road and
U.S. Highway 101 east of Peninsula Golf Course and is legally described as Lot 1 Ennis
Creek Estates.
4. The site is wooded and several of the lots have significant topographical features which will
need to be addressed in the site development process.
5. Surrounding properties are developed with low density single family residential uses to the
southeast and one six-plex condominium at the southwest corner of the site, with a private
golf course to the west, and U.S. Highway 101 to the north with commercial uses.
101
Condilions. Findings and Conclusions
Ludwick PrelimilwlJI Subdivision
Page 2
6. The site is currently served by Del Guzzi Dr., which meets City street standards for a local
access street. All 11 lots shown on the June 11 preliminary plat drawing have access from
Del Guzzi Dr. Transit service is available along U.S. 101 north of the site at Del Guzzi
Drive.
7. Drainage from Peninsula Golf Course comes through the site and must be addressed in a
clearing/grading permit design by a licensed engineer.
8. The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The subject
property is identified as Low Density Residential (LDR) on the Port Angeles Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most
relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A,
Policy A.2, Goal B, Policies B.1- B.3; Transportation Element Goal A, Policies A.3 and A.6;
Utilities and Public Services Element Policy D.l; Housing Element Goal A; Conservation
Element Goal A, Policies A.1-A.3, Goal B, Policy BA, and Objective B.4; Capital Facilities
Element Goal A, Policies A.2, A.9-A.1 0, Goal B, Policies B.6-B.7, Goal C, and Policies C.3
and CA.
9. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer
service, and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9).
10. The Comprehensive Plan recommends concurrency for solid waste collection, stormwater
management, telecommunications service, and emergency services (police, fire and
emergency medical response) (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.1 0).
11. The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Goal B) states the intention to have a
community where residential development and use of the land are done in a manner that is
compatible with the enviroml1ent, the characteristics of the use and the users, and the desired
urban design of the City.
12. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Single Family
Residential (RS-9) which allows a density of up to 9 units per acre. The proposed drawing
indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 9,000 square feet in size.
13. Del Guzzi Dr. is designated as a local access street and is not designated as a school walking
route. The City's Subdivision Ordinance and Urban Standards and Guidelines require the
development of sidewalks on along arterials or school walking routes.
14. All required utility improvements including potable water, sanitary waste, electrical, and
refuse collection have been provided to the subdivision or are available in the area.
15. The Port Angeles School District currently serves the area, and school capacity is not an
issue with the present trend in declining enrollments.
16. The site is cUlTently served by the City's Police, Fire, and Public Works and Utilities
Departments.
102
Condilions. Findings and Conclusions
Ludwick Prelimilwl)' Subdivision
Page 3
17. Building pennits are required for all structures on any approved building lots. All local
Building and Fire Codes apply to any new construction on the subject property. Residential
sprinklers will be required as the site is outside ofthe City's four minute response area for
fire response. Best management practices will be observed in the development of the lots
including a clearing/grading plan that includes erosion control measures.
18. Clearing and gradingpernlits are required for any initial site development on sites of one acre
in size or greater.
19. The City's State Enviromnental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance on July 8, 2004, satisfying the City's SEP A responsibility.
20. Chapter 16.08 ofthe Port Angeles Municipal Code (P AMC) sets forth local requirements for
the review of subdivisions. Preliminary subdivision applications must contain information
relative to the anangement and development of streets within and accessing a proposed
development consistent with the City's Urban Ser.,ices Ordinance and must consider the
relationship to existing roads and topographic conditions, public convenience and safety
issues, and whetber the proposed use of the land is adequately served by such roads.
Infonnation regarding lot size and the relationship between depth to width in lot area
development, vision triangles, building setback and building envelope areas, utility
easements and improvements to those utility services that are needed to service a proposed
development, street lighting, and public spaces.
21. The Revised Code ofWashingtonRCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform
division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire
into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision.
It shall deternline if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health,
safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including
sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who
only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the
subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written
findings that these provisions are made.
22. Section 16.08.050(B)(1) P AMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine the
proposed plat, along with written recommendations of the City Departments, and shall either
approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the
City Council within a period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the
City Planning Department. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed
preliminary plat at a public meeting.
23. The preliminary plat was reviewed by the City's Fire, Public Works and Utilities, Parks and
Recreation, and Community Development Departments. Those comments have been taken
into consideration in the recommended conditions of preliminary approval.
24. Public notice of the subdivision application was published in the Peninsula Daily News on
June 18, 2004, and posted on the site ,tlsailed to property owners within 300 feet of the
Conditions, Findings and Conclusions
Ludwick Prelimin(llJ' Subdivision
Page 4
proposed subdivision on June 16,2004. No written comment was received as a result ofthe
notification.
CONCLUSIONS:
A. The Ludwick preliminary subdivision conditions are required by the City's Subdivision
Ordinance and are necessary to implement the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies for
residential development
B. Stornl drainage, electrical, and telecommunications improvements are the only street and
utility requirements which have not been installed per the City's Urban Services Standards
and Guidelines but will required as a condition of preliminary approval.
C. Due to wooded nature of the subject property, street trees are not needed.
I
D. The large lots proposed are necessary due to the topographical and other access/building
constraints of the property.
E. The RS-9 zone allows for an overall residential density much higher than is proposed. The
subject site is not located in an area with a grid street system and should be developed with
low density housing units and curvilinear streets to achieve the desired urban design of the
City.
F. As conditioned, the preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Code.
G. As conditioned, the preliminary plat is in conformance with the Port Angeles Subdivision
Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 PAMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17
RCW.
H. As conditioned, review has been done and appropriate provisions have been made for the
public health, safety and general welfare and for drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation and
other planning features.
I. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting of this subdivision as articulated
in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision
provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the
Growth Management Act and beneficial to the City's tax base.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of August 3, 2004.
Richard A. Headrick, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
104
Plmwing Commission Minules - July 14 2004
Page 9
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - LUDWICK. Del Guzzi Drive: Review ofa proposed
11 unit residential subdivision in the RS-9, Residential Single Family zone.
Commissioners Norton and Hewins noted that they are members ofthe Peninsula Golf Club
that is an adjacent property owner to the proposed subdivision property. No one in the audience
objected to their remaining at the dais and acting on the application, and so they remained.
Assistant Plmmer Sue Roberds reviewed the Department report recommending approval ofthe
preliminary subdivision. With the help of Director Collins, a Power Point presentation provided a
display ofthe proposed subdivision and area development. Chair Hewins opened the public hearing.
Ial1ltlcElvie, 2373 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, W A spoke in support of the preliminary
application and stated that it is the applicant's desire to keep as many ofthe existing trees on the site
as is feasible as the environnlent is one that is desired to retain.
Steve Zel1ovic, 519 South Peabody #22, Port Angeles, W A responded to technical questions
as the designer and engineer for the project. He explained that the existing storm water drainage
system in the area discharges to Ennis Creek. The proposal is, rather than creating a a series of
detention ponds that would require a maintenance agreement, to do something more conventional
by providing individual drainage plans for each lot. That way, the individual owners will be
responsible for the systems. While some driveways maybe a bit steeper than normal (10% to 12%),
he didn't believe they would present any real development challenge.
Mr. Zenovic responded to Commissioner Nutter that the typical individual stormwater
systems proposed would be fairly simple and would use a retention method such as buried pipe. The
buried pipe would have an inlet structure on one end with a discharge on the other and a control
structure for discharge. Such systems are pretty much fail safe and should last for many years.
Maintenance is not a big challenge and such systems tend to function better than dry wells that have
no designed outflow.
There being no further questions, Chair Hewins closed the public hearing. Commissioner
Nutter moved to recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision citing the following
conditions, findings, and conclusions in support of the action:
Conditions:
1. Drainage and utility easements shall be shown on the final plat.
2. Storn1water drainage improvements shall be installed or bonded per the City's Urban
Services Standards and Guidelines prior to final plat approval.
3. Residential fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in each residential unit as required by the
Fire Department for all new residential building permits. Notice of this requirement shall
be placed on the final plat and recorded separately with the plat.
4. Electrical utilities shall be installed as needed by the applicant or shall be bonded per the
Public Works and Utilities standards prior to final plat approval.
5. Address numbers shall be identified and placed on the final plat as provided by the City.
105
Plmllling Commission Minutes - July 14 2004
Page 10
6. Access easements or boundary line adjustments in favor of Lots 5 and 6 for landlocked
adjacent properties shall be recorded and shown on the final plat.
7. Erosion control measures shall be in place prior to grading and construction.
Findings:
1. The preliminary plat application includes a drawing dated received June 10, 2004, prepared
for William and Carol Ludwick by Zenovic and Associates and used as the basis of the
preliminary plat review. The final plat will be entitled Ludwick Subdivision. The City of
Port Angeles acquired the subject property through a forecJosure on unpaid assessments for
Local Improvement District 211 which was sold to the Ludwicks.
2. The preliminary plat subdivides the 5 acres of land into 11 rysidentiallots. The residential
building lots range in size from 9,290 to 21,430 square feet in area.
3. The proposed subdivision site is located along Del Guzzi Drive between Lindberg Road and
U.S. Highway 101 east of Peninsula Golf Course and is legally described as Lot 1 Ennis
Creek Estates.
4. The site is wooded and several ofthe lots have significant topographical features which will
need to be addressed in the site development process.
5. Surrounding properties are developed with low density single family residential uses to the
southeast and one six-plex condominium at the southwest corner of the site, with a private
golf course to the west, and U.S. Highway 101 to the north with commercial uses.
6. The site is currently served by Del Guzzi Drive, which meets City street standards for a local
access street. All 11 lots shown on the June 11 preliminary plat drawing have access from
Del Guzzi Drive. Transit service is available along U.S. 101 north of the site at Del Guzzi
Drive.
7. Drainage from Peninsula Golf Course comes through the site and must be addressed in a
clearing/grading pennit design by a licensed engineer.
8. The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The subject
property is identified as Low Density Residential (LDR) on the Port Angeles Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most
relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A,
Policy A.2, Goal B, Policies B.1-B.3; Transportation Element Goal A, Policies A.3 and A.6;
Utilities and Public Services Element Policy D.1; Housing Element Goal A; Conservation
Element Goal A, Policies A.1-A.3, Goal B, Policy BA, and Objective BA; Capital Facilities
Element Goal A, Policies A.2, A.9-A.1 0, Goal B, Policies B.6-B.7, Goal C, and Policies C.3
and CA.
106
Planning Commission Minutes - July 14 2004
Page J 1
9. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer
service, and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9).
10. The Comprehensive Plan recommends concurrency for solid waste collection, stormwater
management, telecommunications service, and emergency services (police, fire and
emergency medical response) (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.I 0).
11. The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Goal B) states the intention to have a
community where residential development and use of the land are done in a manner that is
compatible with the environnlent, the characteristics ofthe use and the users, and the desired
urban design of the City.
12. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Single Family
Residential (RS-9) which allows a density of up to 9 units per acre. The proposed drawing
indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 9,000 square feet in size.
I
I
13. Del Guzzi Dr. is designated as a local access street and is not designated as a school walking
route. The City's Subdivision Ordinance and Urban Standards and Guidelines require the
development of sidewalks on along arterials or school walking routes.
14. All required utility improvements including potable water, sanitary waste, electrical, and
refuse collection have been provided to the subdivision or are available in the area.
15. The Port Angeles School District currently serves the area, and school capacity is not an
issue with the present trend in declining enrollments.
16. The site is currently served by the City's Police, Fire, and Public Works and Utilities
Departments.
17. Building permits are required for all structures on any approved building lots. All local
Building and Fire Codes apply to any new construction on the subject property. Residential
sprinklers will be required as the site is outside of the City's four minute response area for
fire response. Best management practices will be observed in the development ofthe lots
including a clearing/grading plan that includes erosion control measures.
18. Clearing and grading pern1its are required for any initial site development on sites of one acre
in size or greater.
19. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance on July 8, 2004, satisfying the City's SEP A responsibility.
20. Chapter 16.08 ofthe Port Angeles Municipal Code (P AMC) sets forth local requirements for
the review of subdivisions. Preliminary subdivision applications must contain information
relative to the arrangement and development of streets within and accessing a proposed
development consistent with the City's Urban Services Ordinance and must consider the
relationship to existing roads and topographic conditions, public convenience and safety
107
Planning Commission Minules - Jill)' 14 2004
Page 12
issues, and whether the proposed use of the land is adequately served by such roads.
InfoTInation regarding lot size and the relationship between depth to width in lot area
development, vision triangles, building setback and building envelope areas, utility
easements and improvements to those utility services that are needed to service a proposed
development, street lighting, and public spaces.
21. The Revised Code ofWashingtonRCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform
division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire
into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision.
It shall detennine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health,
safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including
sidewalks and other plalming features that assure safe walking conditions for students who
only walk to and from school and wbether the public interest will be served by the
subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written
findings that these provisions are made.
22. Section 16.08.050(B)( 1) P AMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine the
proposed plat, along with written recommendations ofthe City Departments, and shall either
approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the
City Council within a period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the
City Plalming Department. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed
preliminary plat at a public meeting.
23. The preliminary plat was reviewed by the City's Fire, Public Works and Utilities, Parks and
Recreation, and Community Development Departments. Those comments have been taken
into consideration in the recommended conditions of preliminary approval.
24. Public notice of the subdivision application was published in the Peninsula Daily News on
June 18,2004, and posted on the site and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the
proposed subdivision on June 16,2004. No written comment was received as a result of the
notification.
Conclusions:
A. The conditions ofthe Ludwick Subdivision are required by the City's Subdivision Ordinance
and are necessary to implement the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies for residential
development
B. Storm drainage, electrical, and telecommunications improvements are the only street and
utility requirements which have not been installed per the City's Urban Services Standards
and Guidelines but will required as a condition of preliminary approval.
C. Due to wooded nature of the subject property, street trees are not needed.
108
Planning Commission Minllles - July 142004
Page 13
D. The large lots proposed are necessary due to the topographical and other access/building
constraints of the property.
E. The RS-9 zone allows for an overall residential density much higher than is proposed. The
subject site is not located in an area with a grid street system and should be developed with
low density housing units and curvilinear streets to achieve the desired urban design of the
City.
F. As conditioned, the preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprebensive Plan and Zoning
Code.
G. As conditioned, the preliminary plat is in conformance with the Port Angeles Subdivision
Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 P AMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17
RCW.
H. As conditioned, review has been done and appropriate provisions have been made for the
public health, safety and general welfare and for drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation and
other planning features.
I. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting of this subdivision as articulated
in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision
provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the
Growth Management Act and beneficial to the City's tax base.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Schramm and passed unanimously.
109
110
'.
~...;;"..'....
e
FOR TAN GE LES
~ FILE
CITY OF
WAS H i N G TON, U. S. A.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Sue Roberds, Assistant Planner
DATE:
July 14, 2004
RE:
Ludwick Preliminary Subdivision
APPLICANTS:
William and Carol Ludwick
O'VNER:
Same
LOCATION:
Directly north of the intersection of Del Guzzi Drive with Lindberg Road
PROPOSAL:
A preliminary subdivision of a 5 acre property into 11 residential building sites
in the RS-9 Residential Single Family zone.
DEPARTMENTAL RECOJ\1MENDATION:
Tbe Department of Community Development recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the preliminary plat with the 7 conditions, 24 findings, and 9 conclusions
found in Attachment A.
PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS:
The site is identified as Lot 1 ofthe Ennis Creek Estates Survey recorded October 25, 1985,
and is located directly north of the intersection of Lindberg Road and Del Guzzi Drive. The property
is located along both sides of Del Guzzi Drive, which extends from Lindberg Road north to Highway
101. Del Guzzi Drive is a developed right-of-way, however, the majority of property along the right-
of-way is undeveloped with the exception of properties located south and east of the subject site.
Proposed Lots 1 - 5 are located along the east side of Del Guzzi Drive. Steep slopes on Lots
3 _ 4 and 6 _ 9 will have special development issues. Del Guzzi Drive elevation drops from 334 feet
to 280 feet adjacent to the subdivision.
Proposed Lots 6 - 11 are located west of Del Guzzi Drive where the topography rises from
northeast to southwest from Del Guzzi Drive to the top of the slope that forms the west boundary of
Lots 6 _ 9 where building sites would be located at an elevation of approximately 342 feet for Lot 6
111
::: '''; ~ ~... ':
'. ....t'.~
. \. \J
Ludwic~ Prelimina!y1!ni'Jtfivision
July 14, 2004
Page 2
..
which is the highest point in elevation in the area. The west boundary of the site is adjacent to the
Peninsula Golf Club property and Lots 5 - 11 will front on the golf course property.
Lots in the proposed subdivision range in area from 9,290 to 34,450 square feet. A small
slice of property (identified on the site map by cross hatching at the southeast comer of the plat) will
be deeded to the abutting property owners whose residence encroaches into the side setback area and
may cross the boundary line onto the applicant's property. The extensions of Lots 5 and 6 south
along Del Guzzi Drive create unusable areas that have little benefit to these lots and reduce or
prevent acce4ss to two adjoining properties which do not have direct access to a public right-of-way.
A condition of approval is proposed to ensure adequate access for the condominium and the Morse
Estate properties to DelGuzzi Drive.
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW:
,I
The Building Division had no concerns but noted that building permits will be required.
The Public Works and Utilities Department indicated that electric utility requirements will be
addressed after the plat is preliminarily approved and additional data is provided. Underground
electric service is required and load calculations, meter locations, and other utility routes will be the
driving factors as to how electric service will serve the lots. Temporary/permanent power is not
available until transformers have been set and primary cable has been installed at the customer's
expense. The City will be responsible for the following:
. Provision and installation of conduit, vaults, sectionalizing cabinet, cable, and related
equipment in the utility right-of-way. Provision and installation of padmount
transformers, pedestals, and street lights.
. The installation of water meters that must be paid for with building permits. The
contractor will install sewer laterals.
The owner/contractor will be responsible for all costs of labor and materials provided by the
City, surveying/staking of property corners, bringing the area to final grade and trenching meeting
WAC Chapter 296 Section 155N, excavation, trenching, and shoring requirements, all backfill and
compaction, and coordination with other utilities for the joint use ofthe electrical trench including
telephone, cable, etc.
All public improvements shall be in accordance with the City's Urban Service Standards and
Guidelines. Required street improvements will include improvement to Lindberg Road along the site
frontage to suburban street standards with a dedication of right-of-way to equal 60'. Lot 1 shall have
a 10' turning radius at the roadway intersection with Del Guzzi Drive.
A sewer easement across Lot 3 to serve Lot 4, or as an alternative, a sewer/storm easement
across the neighboring Mantooth property for sewer access to Del Guzzi Drive, shall be given or
acquired. All residential construction will require connection to the sewer main.
PUBLIC COM1\1ENT:
The site was posted with public hearing notices sent to surrounding property owners on June
16,2004, and legal publication appearing in the Peninsula Daily News on June 18, 2004, which
actions meet the City's legal publication requirements for preliminary subdivision review. No
written public comments have been received at the time ofthis report.
112
Ludwick PrelimilwlJ' Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 3
DEP ARTMENT AL ANALYSIS:
The proposal conforms to preliminary plat development requirements with regard to lot size
and access, emergency vehicle access, and utility provision requirements. Building density should
decrease in areas where topographic or unique environmental features are present. Lots 3 - 4 and
6 _ 9 need to be designed with topographic constraints of the area in mind. ith the topographic
constraints of the area in mind. While stonnwater drainage, electrical, and telecommunications
improvements in the area currently do not meet the City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines,
conditions of preliminary plat approval will require that utilities be adequately placed for the
proposed development. Street improvements along Del Guzzi Drive satisfy the City's requirements
and meet the City's level of service standards for the proposed development. A dedication of an
additional 1 0 foot of right-of-way along the Lindberg Road frontage of Lots 1 and 4 will be required
to complete the right-of-way width to 60 feet.
The City does not have neighborhood parks or playfields in the vicinity; however, as the
number of lots in the subdivision do not exceed 30, the development will not be required to provide a
play area.
The City's Subdivision Ordinance and Urban Services and Standards and Guidelines require
the development of sidewalks along arterial streets but not on local access streets, unless such a street
is also a designated school walking route. Proposed lots are accessed by local access streets not
arterial streets nor school walking routes. Lots 3, and 5 - 11 will have driveway development issues
due to slopes in the area. The City does not provide specific standards for private driveway slopes
but will review lot approach issues during building design.
ENVIRONMENT AL REVIEW:
The Department of Ecology commented that stormwater issues and erosion control measures
need to be addressed in the development.
A detennination of nonsignificance was issued for the proposal on July 7, 2004, under WAC 197-11-
355 following a review period that ended on July 6,2004. This satisfies the City's responsibility
under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A).
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan establishes the long range goals, policies, and objectives of the City
as well as the desired urban design. It is the basis upon which City officials are to make land use
decisions. Any project proposed in the City must be consistent with the goals, policies, and
objectives of the Comprebensive Plan and the desired urban design of the City.
Map Designation
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map identifies three separate categories ofresidential
development. The site is designated as Low Density Residential which allows an overall single
family residential density up to 9 units per net acre. The high majority ofresidentially designated
property in the City will be of this designation. It also allows for the development of duplexes and
planned residential developments in accordance with the underlying zoning.
113
Ludwick Preliminal}' Subdivision
July 14. 2004
Page 4
Goals, Policies, and Objectives
The entire Comprehensive Plan has been reviewed with respect to the proposal. Although the
entire ordinance has not been cited, the goals, policies, and objectives which apply to the proposal
are identified in Attachment C with a few pertinent issues outlined below:
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal A: To manage growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial to the community as a whole, is
sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals and is consistent with the State of Washington's Growth
Management Act.
LAt\TJ) USE ELEMENT
Residential
Goal A: To guide current andfuture development within the City in a manher that provides certainty to its
citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the challenges and opportunities of the
future.
Policy A.2: All land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council and/or any of its
appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and its land use map.
The proposal is located in an area that is designatedfor residential use.
Goal B: To have a community where residential development and use of the land are done in a manner that
is compatible with the environment, the characteristics of the use and the users, and the desired urban design
of the City.
Policy B.t: Urban services shall be available for all residential areas as required by the Capital
Facilities Element concurrency policy.
City services, water, sewer, and utilities, are available in the area and will be extended to
the site at the applicant's expense.
Policy B.2: Singlefamily lots should be of reasonable shape and should have access provided by an
alley or by a local access street or a collector arterial.
The proposed lots meet the minimum width to depth ratio required in the RS-9 zone and meet or
exceed minimum lot area requirements. All of the lots will be accessed by improved City streets.
Policy B.3: All residential developments should be designed with the provisions offire protection
and service vehicle access as key factors in the street design and circulation pattern. For efficient
circulation, rights-of way should be obtained and improvements made to further the grid street
pattern of the City. Cul-de-sacs may be permitted when designed as an integral part of the major
grid street pattern of the City.
The proposed subdivision will provide residential building sites that access of! Del Guzzi Drive or
Lindberg Road. Del Guzzi Drive is built to City standards for emergency service vehicles. Right-of-way
will be obtained to complete the needed 60' right-of-way width on Lindberg Road adjacent to the property,
and improvements shall be required.
114
Ludwick Prelimill(llJ' Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 5
TRANSPORT A Tl ON ELEMENT
Goal A: To develop a coordinated, multi-modal transportation system which serves all areas of the city and
all types of users in a safe, economical, and efficient manner.
Policy A.3: 77w collector arterial streets and local access streets should serve primarily local traffic
with special emphasis on safety for pedestrian traffic.
Streets sen1ing the site are Del Guzzi Drive and Lindberg Road. Lindberg Road will be
developed to suburban standards which requires a pedestrian walking path separatedfrom the road by a
ditch.
HOUSING ELEMENT
Goal A: To improve the variety, quality, availability, and afJordability of housing opportunities in the City of
Port Angeles.
The subject site exhibits unique physical features and natural amenities, and due to its location
near the Peninsula Golf Club, should provide a high quality residential development.
CONSERVATION ELEMENT
Goal A: To create and maintain a community with a high quality of life where the land is used in a manner
that is compatible with the area's unique physical features, its natural, historical, archaeological, and
cultural amenities, and the overall environment.
Policy A.2: The City should promote compatibility between the land and its use by regulating the
intensity of the land use.
The proposed subdivision is located in the RS-9 zone that allows for larger lots than the
standard RS-7 (7,000 square foot lots) zone. The RS-9 zone allows for singlefamily development and
requires 25-foot setbacks front and rear and 8-foot setbacks on the sides to allow for adequate separation
of uses. The City's preliminary plat of the subject site had 7 lots and a large storm drainage
retention/detention area. The proposed increases the plat to 11 lots with no drainage pond area. A
drainage plan will be required and has been submitted to the City's Public Works and Utilities Department
to address drainage and storm water concerns.
Goal B: To protect and enhance the area's unique physical features, its natural, historical, archaeological,
and cultural amenities, and the overall environment.
Policy B.4: Building density should decrease as natural constraints increase.
The site contains some moderate slopes which must be observed during development
design. Most lots contain adequate area for redivision, however, given the site topography and curvature
of the fronting street (Del Guzzi Drive), the proposed lot sizes are likely to be the ultimate build out areas
for the lots. Additionally, as minimum lot width in the RS-9 zone is 75 feet, only one of the lots (Lot 5)
could be resubdivided.
Objective B.4: The City will adopt and enforce regulations which require all new development to
provide adequate stormwater retention/detention facilities necessary to protect water quality.
The subdivision will be conditioned to require that storm water issues are addressed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and applicable state,y,olicies. As noted earlier, storm water
retention/detention is being designed without a pondbli
Ludwick Preliminnry Subdivision
July 14. 2004
Page 6
CAPITAL FA CILITIES ELEMENT
Goal A: To provide and maintain safe and financially feasible urban services and capital facilities at or
above stated levels of service to all City residents and the general public.
Policy A.2: The City should, at a minimum, ensure the continuation of established level of service
standards for all urban utilities and services to the extent and in the manner provided herein.
The City's Urban Services and Guidelines standards provide minimum level of service standards.
The proposal, as conditioned, will meet or exceed those minimum standards.
Policy A.9: The City shall require concurrency at the time of development for the following utilities
and services: streets, water service, sanitary sewer service, and electrical service.
I
I
Policy A.I0: The City should require thefollowing utilities and services at the time of development:
solid waste collection, stormwater management, telecommunications service, and emergency services
(police, fire and emergency medical response).
With regard to the above listed goal and policies, services that are /lot as yet in the area will be
extended at the applicant's expense prior to final approval of the subdivision.
Goal B: To provide urban streets and utilities at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the
general public.
Policy B.6: The City should not approve any development that increases a site's post-development
stormwater run-off beyond that allowed by the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound
Basin as adopted by the City.
Storm water management cOlltrol will be placed by the applicant during development of the
site, and nmoffwill not exceed that allowed by the Storm water Mangement Manualfor the Puget Sound
Basin.
Policy B.7: The City should not approve any development that cannot be served with
telecommunications service at or greater than the following level of service standards at the time of
development: telephone, residential: 1 service per unit/ cable television, residential: 1 service per unit.
Telecomm ullication facilities are available and can be extended to the site. Telecable
service is available in the area can serve the project.
Goal C: To provide urban services at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the general public.
Policy C.4: The City should not approve any development that will not be served at or less than the
following level of service standards at the time of development: Police: 677 persons per one officer.
Fire: 4 minute response time or residential sprinkler system installation.
The site is located within the City's four minute response area but, as all residential
subdivisions require residential sprinkler system installation, such will be required in the conditions of
approval.
116
Ludwick Preliminary Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 7
ZONING CODE:
The Zoning Code (Title 17 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code) is the primary implementing
ordinance for the Comprehensive Plan. 11 establishes what types of uses are permitted and where
they may be located in the City. 11 also establishes minimum design standards for such uses. Like
the Comprehensive Plan, any project proposed in the City must be consistent with the regulations of
the zone in which it is located. The Zoning Code has been reviewed with respect to the proposal.
Although the entire ordinance has not been cited, the development standards and regulations found to
be most relevant areinc1uded in Attachment C.
The Zoning Map identifies the site as RS-9, Residential Single Family.
The purpose and intent of the RS-9 Zone is "This is a low density residential zone intended to
create and preserve urban single family residential neighborhoods co~sisting of predominantly
single family homes on larger than standard Townsite-size lots. Uses that are compatible with and
functionally related to a single family residential environment may be located in this zone. Because
of land use impacts associated with nonresidential uses, few nonresidential uses are allowed in this
zone and then only conditionally. This zone provides for a variety in the urban land use patternfor
the City's single family residential neighborhoods, following a curvilinear street system of
nonthrough public and private streets with irregularly shaped lots, minimum 7 5-foot front lot lines,
and 60-foot rights-oi-way for col/ector arterial streets in large rectangular blocks and usually
located in o.utlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable land. "
Development standards of the RS-9 zone are as follows:
Minimum lot area is 9,000 square feet.
Front: 25 feet
Rear: 25 feet, except 10 feet for detached accessory buildings in the
rear one-third of the lot.
8 feet, except 3 feet for detached accessory buildings in the rear
30 feet
30%
Interior Side:
Maximum Height:
Lot Coverage:
The proposed subdivision drawing conforms to the RS-9 zoning requirements.
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE:
The City's Subdivision Ordinance (Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code) has
been reviewed with respect to the proposal. Although the entire ordinance has not been cited, the
development standards, policies, and regulations found to be most relevant are included in
Attachment C to this staff report.
Preliminary plat maps must contain information relative to the arrangement and development
of streets within and accessing a proposed development and must address the relationship between
those streets and topographic conditions to determine whether the proposed use of the land is
adequately served for transportation and emergency access issues, whether environmentally sensitive
areas exist and how they are being addressed, public convenience and safety issues, public spaces,
117
Ludwick Preliminm)' Subdivision
July 14,2004
Page 8
zoning, and the relationship between a subject property and the surrounding properties use wise.
Informatjon regarding lot size and the relationship between depth to width in lot area development,
vision triangles, building setback and bujlding envelope areas, utility easements, existing and needed
improvements for those utjlity services to service a proposed development under the City's Urban
Services Standards and Guidelines standards, and street lighting is also reviewed.
All of the required information for preliminary subdivision approval is contained in the
preliminary map and application information. The site contains some moderate slopes which
must be observed during development design. Given the site topography and curvature of the
fronting street, the proposed large lot sizes are likely to be the ultimate build out areas for the lots.
No new streets will result as part of the development off of the local access street. Street trees and
sidewalks are not required for the access street because it is not an arterial or a school walking
route. Lots 3, and 5 _ 11 will have driveway development issues due to slopes in the area that must
be addressed during final lot design and development. Lot areas exceed those required in the RS-
9 zone.
T:\SUB\Ludwi ckpreliminary. wpd
118
Ludwick Preliminary' Subdivision
July 14. 2004
Page 9
ATTACHMENT A
CONDITIONS, FINDINGS, AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE LUD'VICK
SUBDIVISION:
CONDITIONS:
1. Drainage and utility easements shall be shown on the final plat.
2. Stormwater drainage improvements shall be installed or bonded per the City's Urban Services
Standards and Guidelines prior to final plat approval.
3. Residential fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in each residential unit as required by the
Fire Department shall be a condition of any new residential building permit. Notice of this
requirement shall be placed on the final plat and recorded separately with the plat.
4. Electrical utilities shall be installed as needed by the applicant or shall be bonded per the
Public Works and Utilities standards prior to final plat approval.
5. Address numbers shall be identified and placed on the final plat as provided by the City.
6. Access easements or boundary line adjustments in favor of Lots 5 and 6 for landlocked
adjacent properties shall be recorded and shown on the final plat.
7. Erosion control measures shall be in place prior to grading and construction.
FINDINGS:
1. The preliminary plat application includes a drawing dated received June 10,2004, prepared
for William and Carol Ludwick by Zenovic and Associates and used as the basis of the
preliminary plat review. The final plat will be entitled Ludwick Subdivision. The City of
Port Angeles acquired the subject property through a foreclosure on unpaid assessments for
Local Improvement District 211 which was sold to the Ludwicks.
2. The preliminary plat subdivides the 5 acres ofland into 11 residential lots. The residential
building lots range in size from 9,290 to 21,430 square feet in area.
3. The proposed subdivision site is located along Del Guzzi Dr. between Lindberg Road and
U.S. Highway 101 east of Peninsula Golf Course and is legally described as Lot 1 Ennis
Creek Estates.
4. The site is wooded and several of the lots have significant topographical features which will
need to be addressed in the site development process.
119
Ludwick Preliminmy Subdivision
July 14. 2004
Page 10
5. Surrounding properties are developed with low density single family residential uses to the
southeast and one six-plex condominium at the southwest corner oftbe site, with a private
golf course to the west, and U.S. Highway 101 to the north with commercial uses.
6. The site is currently served by Del Guzzi Dr., which meets City street standards for a local
access street. All II lots shown on the June 11 preliminary plat drawing have access from
Del Guzzi Dr. Transit service is available along U.S. 101 north of the site at Del Guzzi
Drive.
7. Drainage from Peninsula Golf Course comes through the site and must be addressed in a
clearing/grading permit design by a licensed engineer.
8. The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The subject
property is identified as Low Density Residential (LDR) on tht Port Angeles Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most
relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A,
Policy A.2, Goal B, Policies B.1-B.3; Transportation Element Goal A, Policies A.3 and A.6;
Utilities and Public Services Element Policy D.1; Housing Element Goal A; Conservation
Element Goal A, Policies A.l-A.3, Goal B, Policy BA, and Objective B.4; Capital Facilities
Element Goal A, Policies A.2, A.9-A.l 0, Goal B, Policies B.6-B.7, Goal C, and Policies C.3
and CA.
9. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer
service, and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9).
10. The Comprehensive Plan recommends concurrency for solid waste collection, stormwater
management, telecommunications service, and emergency services (police, fire and
emergency medical response) (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.l 0).
11. The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Goal B) states the intention to have a
community where residential development and use of the land are done in a manner that is
compatible with the environment, the characteristics of the use and the users, and the desired
urban design of the City.
12. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Single Family
Residential (RS-9) which allows a density of up to 9 units per acre. The proposed drawing
indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 9,000 square feet in size.
13. Del Guzzi Dr. is designated as a local access street and is not designated as a school walking
route. The City's Subdivision Ordinance and Urban Standards and Guidelines require the
development of sidewalks on along arterials or school walking routes.
14. All required utility improvements including potable water, sanitary waste, electrical, and
refuse collection have been provided to the subdivision or are available in the area.
120
Ludwick PrelimiJJ(l1J' SlIbdivision
Jill)' 14, 2004
Page] J
15.
T11P "Port /:;"l(lplpC c;,..],("v,l T1;ctI';('t ('nTrP1'th, cp-n,pc thP arpa "nn 10('1,001 ("'",.., "'('1' t.." 1'" not an ;C'C'ue
-LJ. \,.-..L .1.'- J. J,....L c...... ""'u .....,'-'-'-...V......... ~J.U" .1......... .........................j. J.J u......l"........ ............... ......,......... - ................. .... ......L4.t'~...... ".1 .....J. J. .L"'~
with the present trend in declining erirollments.
16. The site is cunently served by the City's Police, Fire, and Public Works and Utilities
Departments.
17. Building pennits are required for an structures on any approved building lots. All local
Building and Fire Codes apply to any new construction on the subject property. Residential
sprinklers win be required as the site is outside ofthe City's four minute response area for
fire response. Best management practices will be observed in the development of the lots
including a clearing/grading plan that includes erosion control measures.
18. Clearing and grading permits are required for any initial site development on sites of one acre
in size or greater.
19. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance on July 8, 2004, satisfying the City's SEP A responsibility.
20. Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (P AMC) sets forth local requirements for
the review of subdivisions. Preliminary subdivision applications must contain information
relative to the arrangement and development of streets within and accessing a proposed
development consistent with the City's Urban Services Ordinance and must consider the
relationship to existing roads and topographic conditions, public convenience and safety
issues, and whether the proposed use of the land is adequately served by such roads.
Information regarding lot size and the relationship between depth to width in lot area
development, vision triangles, building setback and building envelope areas, utility easements
and improvements to those utility services that are needed to service a proposed development,
street lighting, and public spaces.
21. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform
division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire
into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision.
It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health,
safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including
sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who
only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the
subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written
findings that these provisions are made.
22. Section 16.08.050(B)(1) P AMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine the
proposed plat, along with written recommendations ofthe City Departments, and shall either
approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the
City Council within a period of 90 days afttQi)preliminary plat has been submitted to the City
Ludwick Preliminary) Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 12
23. The preliminary plat was reviewed by the City's Fire, Public Works and Utiljties, Parks and
Recreation, and Community Development Departments. Those comments have been taken
into consideration in the recommended conditions of preliminary approval.
24. Public notice of the subdivision application was published in the Peninsula Daily News on
June 18,2004, and posted on the site and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the
proposed subdivision on June 16,2004. No written comment was received as a result ofthe
notification.
CONCLUSIONS:
A. The conditions of the Ludwick Subdivision are required by the'ICity's Subdivision Ordinance
and are necessary to implement the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies for residential
development
B. Storm drainage, electrical, and telecommunlcations improvements are the only street and
utility requirements which have not been installed per the City's Urban Services Standards and
Guidelines but will required as a condition of preliminary approval.
C. Due to wooded nature ofthe subject property, street trees are not needed.
D. The large lots proposed are necessary due to the topographical and other access/building
constraints of the property.
E. Tbe RS-9 zone allows for an overall residential density much higher than is proposed. The
subject site is not located in an area with a grid street system and should be developed with
low density housing units and curvilinear streets to achieve the desired urban design ofthe
City.
F. As conditioned, the preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zomng
Code.
G. As conditioned, the preliminary plat is in conformance with the Port Angeles Subdivision
Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 PAMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17
RCW.
H. As conditioned, review has been done and appropriate provisions have been made for the
public health, safety and general welfare and for drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation and
other planning features.
1. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting ofthis subdivision as articulated in
the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision
provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the
Growth Management Act and beneficial t~ ~2City's tax base.
Ludwick PrelimilwlJ' Subdivisio/1
July 14, 2004
Pnge 13
A TT ACHl\1ENT C
COTviPREHENSIVE PLAN, Z01"UNG CODE, ~l\1J) SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Map Designation
The Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map identifies the subject site as Low Density Residential
(LDR).
GROWTH MANA GElVffiNT ELKMENT
Goal A: To manage growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial to the community as a whole, is
sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals and is consistent with the State of Washington 's Growth
Management Act.
LAND USE ELEMENT
Residential
Goal A: To guide current andfuture development within the City in a manner that provides certainty to its
citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessQ7Y to meet the challenges and opportunities of the
future.
Policy A.2: All land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council and/07- any of its
appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and its land use map.
Goal B: To have a community where residential development and use of the land are done in a manner that
is compatible with the environment, the characteristics of the use and the users, and the desired urban design
of the City.
Policy B.1: Urban services shall be available f07- all residential areas as required by the Capital
Facilities Element concurrency policy.
Policy B.2: Singlefamily lots should be of reasonable shape and should have access provided by an
alley or by a local aCcess street or a collector arterial.
Policy B.3: All residential developments should be designed with the provisions offire protection and
service vehicle access as key factors in the street design and circulation pattern. For efficient
circulation, rights-ofway should be obtained and improvements made to further the grid street
pattern of the City. Cul-de-sacs may be permitted when designed as an integral part of the major grid
street pattern of the City.
The configuration of the proposed subdivision 10ts and street 1ayout conform to the desired urban
design ofthe City for the RS-9 Zone.
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Goal A: To develop a coordinated, multi-modal transportation system which serves all areas of the city and
all types of users in a safe, economical, and efficient manner.
123
Ludwick Prelimilwl)' Subdivision
July 14, 2004
Page 14
Policy A.3: The collector a7'terial streets and local access streets should serve primarily local t7'affic
with special emphasis on safety for pedestrian traffic.
Policy A.6: Planning for transportation services and facilities (including public streets, bikeways,
pedestrian walkways, and public and private air, marine and land transit services and facilities) shall
be pe/formed consistent with the goals and policies of the Capital Facilities Element.
UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT
Policy D.I: Urban services should be designed for the maximum planned density and/or land use
intensity of a given area as designated on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
HOUSING ELEMENT
Goal A: To improve the variety,' quality, availability, and affordability of housing opportunities in the City of
Port Angeles. I
The subject site not only exhibits unique physical features and natural amenities but also represents a
unique large lot neighborhood due to these same environmental constraints. As a result, the subdivision lots
should provide a high quality residential environment.
. CONSERVATION ELEMENT
Goal A: To create and maintain a community with a high quality of life where the land is used in a manner
that is compatible with the area's unique physical features, its natural, historical, archaeological, and
cultural amenities, and the overall environment.
Policy A.I: The City should require all development, including the location and design of all
structures and open space areas, to be compatible with the unique physical features and natural
amenities of the land and complement the environment in which it is placed, while recognizing the
rights of private ownership.
Policy A.2: The City should promote compatibility between the land and its use by regulating the
intensity of the land use.
Policy A.3: The City should adopt development criteria which promote the use of innovative design
techniques to provide for the use oj the land in a manner compatible with any unique physical
features or valuable natural, historical, and/or cultural amenities.
Goal B: To protect and enhance the area's unique physical features, its natural, historical, archaeological,
and cultural amenities, and the overall environment.
Policy B.4: Building density should decrease as natural constraints increase.
Objective B.4: The City will adopt and enforce regulations which require all new development to
provide adequate stormwater retention/detention facilities necessary to protect water quality.
CAPIT AL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Goal A: To provide and maintain safe and financially feasible urban services and capital facilities at or
above stated levels of service to all City residents any ~4general public.
Ludwick Pl'elimilwlJ' SlIbdivision
July 14.2004
Page 15
Policy A.2: The City should, at a minimum, ensure the continuation of established level of service
standards for all urban ulililies and services to the extent and in the manne)' provided herein.
Policy A.9: The City shall require concurrency at the time of development for the following utilities
and services: streets, water service, sanita7Y sewer service, and electrical service.
Policy A.I 0: The City should require the following utilities and services at the time of development:
solid waste collection, stormwater management, telecommunications service, and emergency services
(police, fire and emergency medical response).
Polic~7 A.II: The City should require the following utilities and services within six years ji-om the
time of development: parks and recreation services and facilities and transit system.
Goal B: To provide urban streets and utilities at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the
general public.
Policy B.6: The City should not approve an.v development that increases a site's post-development
stormwater run-offbeyond that allowed by the Stormwater Management Manualfor the Puget Sound
Basin as adopted by the City.
Policy B.7: 171e City should not approve any development that cannot be served with
telecommunications service at or greater than the following level of service standards at the time of
development: telephone, residential: 1 service per unit/ cable television, residential: ] service per
unit.
Goal C: To provide urban services at minimum levels of service for all city residents and the general public.
Policy C.3: 171e City should not approve any development that will not be served at or greater than a
city- wide level of service standard of 9 acres of parks per 1,000 population within six years ji-om the
time of development.
Policy C.4: 171e City should not approve any development that will not be served at or less than the
following level of service standards at the time of development: police: 677 persons per one officer.
Fire: 4 minute response time or residential sprinkler system installation.
Z01\1JNG CODE
The Zoning Code (Title 17 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code) is the primary ordinance for
implementing the Comprehensive Plan. It establishes what types of uses are perrnitted and where they may be
located in the City. It also establishes minimum design standards for such uses. Like the Comprehensive
Plan, any project proposed in the City must be consistent with the regulations of the zone in which it is
located. The Zoning Code has been reviewed with respect to the proposal. Although the entire ordinance has
not been cited, the development standards and regulations found to be most relevant are as follows:
The Zoning Map identifies the site as RS-9, Residential Single Family.
125
Ludwick Preliminn1J' Subdivision
July 14.2004
Page 16
The purpose and intent of the RS-9 Zone is as follows:
The minimum lot area is 9,000 square feet. All lots shall comply with the minimum area and
dimensional requirements as follows:
Pront: 25 feet
Rear: 25 feet, except 10 feet for detached accessory buildings in the
rear one-third of the lot.
8 feet, except 3 feet for detached accessory buildings in the rear
30 feet
30%
Interior Side:
Maximum Height:
Lot Coverage:
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
The City's Subdivision Ordinance (Chapter 16.08 of the Port Ange1e~ Municipal Code) has been
reviewed with respect to the proposal. Although the entire ordinance has not been cited, the development
standards, policies, and regulations found to be most relevant are as follows:
16.08.060 - Standards and Policies.
A. GENERAL STANDARDS. If a proposed street and/or lot pattern for any zone in Port
Angeles has been made by the Councilor the Commission, the street layout of any new plat submitted shall be
in general conformance to said pattern or plan. Otherwise proposed streets in new subdivisions shall conform
to the Comprehensive Plan and Urban Services Ordinance as adopted.
No plan for the platting, replatting, subdivision, or dedication of any area shall be recommended for
approval by the Commission unless streets shown therein are cOIlllected by surfaced road to an existing
improved public right-of-way adequate to serve the existing and new lots.
Where the Comprehensive Plan or the City's official street plan indicates the necessity of a new right-
of-way of a required width or portion thereof for street purposes, whether within a new plat or new
subdivision, or along the boundaries of a new plat, new subdivision or new lot, such required right-of-way or
portion thereof shall be dedicated to the City of Port Angeles by the filing of a plat.
The PlaIllling Commission may require plats to provide areas for parks, playgrounds, open spaces,
recreation facilities, schools, school grounds, safe walking conditions on school routes, transit stops, and
drainage ways.
Each proposed subdivision and the ultimate use ofthe land therein shall be in the interests of public
health, safety and welfare, and subdividers shall be prepared to present evidence to this effect when requested
by the Commission.
Restrictive covenants not contrary to existing regulations regarding the use ofland, governing and
binding all future owners of lots or tracts, may be shown on any plat.
No Pinal plat ofland within the force and effect of existing Zoning Regulations shall be approved
unless it is conforming with such Regulations.
Whenever there is a discrepancy between minimum standards or dimensions noted herein and those
contained in Zoning Regulations, Building Codes, or other official Regulations, the highest standard shall
apply.
B. GENERAL PRINClJ>LES, POLICIES. The Commission shall ensure that appropriate
provision is made for: (1) the harmonious development of neighborhoods by requiring coordination of streets
within subdivisions with existing or plaIllled streets, or with other elements of the Comprehensive Plan; (2)
adequate open spaces for recreation, schools, light and air; (3) distribution of population and traffic which will
create conditions favorable to public health, safety and convenience.
126
Llldwick prelimiJ1(lI)' Subdivision
Jill)' 14, 2004
Page 17
C. STREETS AI\TD ROADS,
1. The arrangement, character, extent, width, grade and location of all roads shall
_ confoTI11 with the Comprehensive Plan, includirlg the Capital Facilities Plan, and Urban Services Ordinance
and shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned roads, to topographic conditions, to public
convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed uses of the land to be served by such
roads.
2. Where such is not shown on the Comprehensive Plan, the arrangement of streets in a
subdivision sha11 either provide for t11e continuation or appropriate projection of existing major streets in the
surrounding area; or shall confonn to a plan for the neighborhood, approved by the Commission, to meet a
particular situation where topographic or other conditions make continuance or conformance to existing roads
impracticable. This shall also apply to cluster subdivisions.
3. If a preliminary or suggested plan for an area has been made by the Commission, the
street layout of a proposed s~bdivision in such an area shall be in general 'confonnance to the plan.
4. When a portion of a subdivider's tract is to be subdivided, a street plan for the entire
tract shall be submitted to indicate how the street pattern of the plat submitted will coordinate with the entire
tract when fully platted. I
5. Vlhere a tract is subdivided mto lots or tracts of an acre or more in area, the
Commission may require an arrangement of lots and streets such as to permit a later resubdivision in
conformity with the street and lot requirements specified in these Regulations.
6. Vlherever practical, dead-end streets shall be avoided. However, roads designed with
a turn-around at one end (cul-de-sac) may be used when conditions warrant their use.
7. Vlherever practical, minor streets shall be laid out to discourage through traffic within
residential neighborhoods.
8. Where a proposed subdivision abuts or contains an existing or proposed major road,
or is adjacent to an existing or planned business, commercial or industrial district, the Commission may
require treatment as may be necessary (1) for the adequate protection ofresidential properties; and (2) to
afford separation of through and local traffic.
10. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles. Acute
angle intersection shall be avoided.
E. LOTS.
1. The lot area, width, depth, shape and orientation, and the minimum building setback
lines shall be appropriate for the location of the subdivision, for the type of development and land use
contemplated, and shall conform with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. Excessive depth in relation to width shall be avoided. No lot shall have a depth
greater than twice its width,
3. Corner lots for residential use shall have extra width to permit appropriate building
setback from and orientation to both streets.
4. To ensure public health, convenience and safety, the subdividing of land shall
provide, by means of a public street, each lot with satisfactory access to an existing public street.
S. Double frontage and reverse frontage lots shall be avoided, except where essential to
provide separation ofresidential development from traffic arteries or to overcome specific disadvantages of
topography and orientation. A planting screen easement across which there shall be no right of access shall be
provided along the line oflots abutting such a traffic artery or disadvantageous use.
F. PUBLIC SPACES.
2. Where deemed essential by the Commission, upon consideration of the particular type
of development proposed in the subdivision, and especially in large-scale neighborhood unit developments not
anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan, the Commission may require the dedication or reservation of such
areas or sites of a character, extent and location suitable to the needs created by such development for schools,
parks and other neighborhood purposes.
127
Ludwick Preliminal)' Subdivision
July 14,2004
Page] 8
3. Due regard shall be shown for the preservation of outstanding natural and cultural
features such as scenic spots, water courses, and historic sites, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the
Wetlands Protection Ordinance, and the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protection Ordinance.
G. EASEMENTS.
1. Utility easements shall be provided, centered on front, rear, or side lot lines.
2. Where a subdivision is traversed by a water course, drainage way, channel, or stream,
there shall be provided a stOIDl water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the
hnes of such water course, and such further width or construction, or both, as will be adequate for the purpose.
Parallel roads or parkways may be required in connection therewith.
H. STREET LIGHTING. Street lighting installations shall be located in reference to the
dimensions of full grown trees and in accordance with the determinations and standards of the City Engineer.
1. DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS. Variations from and exceptions to the following standards
may be made by the Commission, where topographic or other existing conditions make adherence to these
Regulations impractical.
L. LOTS.
1. The minimum width, depth, area and setback dimensions of all lots in proposed
subdivisions shall conform with City Zoning Regulations. If any dimension in a plat is more restrictive than
the said Regulations, then the most restrictive dimension shall apply.
M. BUILDING LThfE SETBACK.
1. The building line setback from the property lines of all lots shall be indicated by a
dashed line on all plats.
P. SIGNAGE One (1) free standing sign no larger than twenty-four (24) square feet in area
shall be permitted for identification of the subdivision.
128
1_", I, .-1' :i~. 'i--ti J 111 ; -:-
" .J'. -'lfl~'.~ r I , .'
j: ] llilij ! ~-r :,.
'1S:07' .
."" ...
',,"y
; ,-,
I . .-""......
.:u--j: . /... ., .. ' . . , IJ
':.'['. .... " ,
J: .. /A.' i:'~-..
;.:~~,;..r/' ,',\ t ;l,:;,,_;._ _ " _' ..": '. . .'
. .-tf''*~i;,nt:::. .~. .".....I:r.\~:j-.~.~~' "..''''
I r- . "'" ~ < .
I' ...~ --' i "".....::.- _ I . r ' ,
l : .' .~ ...~. ~/<.. ~"~:"""'.z
,;, t........-e-.:;....~::-.:< .
. . ~~ ,,' ..' .
<
'.' .;
r' '~:: I ._~,:,:
.....~I~:.,:;:-,'~.~:1;
l;' -'Fe
~, r .
':'.;,,,
{A'
.}'.:L
<),';'
.r-,....~~.,..~..~
..........
..~-.
-, '. .
,., ::'
;~.ir."~~~..i
~,~"..- , ~...,o;<.. I ;
.,......~._._". ':~-:i':':.~..~:'-~ _",;,::::,~:::~,:j'\-i~-::~/
,. 'r. r',< ;
:if. ~~, -" "
.r.:, ''''\ t, f.~j;~,;{...'.,~,".~':'
'f'l ':. "l~!i'~':~ .' ' _
if'. "'Ii) ,~; r.. ~-:
. . ,~..,.. '-:'_,../ :'yi ,/).". . ,~r."
. ~!.."&"'..r T': ~"""""'~)P"'t"'. '.t.;c::". . ~ ,"
'rlf~~~ft~: ~...~....' > ~
ti,;lYl'" ; .!'" ; '.
. IJ~r:."~ . <~r",..JJ' ~~ ':. Ji;,
~:" "~r;' '1: t;~; do'f'" ~~
"'-if" 'Z! .. iK\;m~:;.
"~;\ J ; J"~..'.i, .' .l!!:,ui
}.#~. . . . J" ....!. r-.....'
.,.- ..,..ti~:~~ ;i~...... ::J'>~
',,\ 't. i ;';A.'.
',.o"".~~~' ~,l:
,
'.t:>",,>.,
?
., ....:..~P.,-'"..,~_.....'v....
~~~~~~.~}.",~-.,f't :~
f ;:;j:z:
9...;
:-. "".:;.
'"
~~I
~
~
}
......
.--,.,.-_.--)_::~/~\ 1
...0~:::~~:j.----"--"' 1 I ~
-~-- ~ ..._~---....,.." .....~...,... . t t
"--.- ;~--'~~-------../" II l (
.'rJ.'.. II
.---..- -----'j I _L___,..,____
....J '. .\""',) J ~--._-"'-___.,__, , '.~
:;/?'~>/ I
Q...y ,:.- .""-
~b~\;~~~~4~tl" ~-- .
.'~'.: Tt::::; ",
...., \....... . . . .
o
ell
t.)
0...
6
;:l
[JJ
[JJ
[JJ
-<
Cl.l
:1/)
,lo-
D
'~
. . ,- .
<<.~... ........
r/J,',',' ,
,. . . . .
, '
, , ,
o
CD
ro
::J
:w.
e
c
Q)
.0..,
130
~
Ij)
~
~
~
~
Ij)
~
Ij)
r./J
H
Ij)
~
~
.."'"
~
~
~
H
o
~
r./J
~~""""'~--"~---"___'..._~.m~_._"
"'-~'--"'-~''''-~'''~'--'''-'---_.'----''--''--''''
- ''''"--"......-
~ -~--.......~_."".........-
~~,,~~'-. --'-
.'''-.--.--
....".., --- ---'-
~
o
. "....,-I
r./'J
. "....,-I
>
. "....,-I
~
~
r./J.
,Vj
()
. "....,-I
~
~
~
~
"\ \\ /'/~'
> ".-~~...,
, "\, /.;.~)"~"
. . /.,.>,,~ I "1 ii"
"'::=b~"J. l ---:-:-:.:5;;;i?-~..'<' !I :/ " . ....
~~~~&-' ': fi:1 II ;.
"', ". -~ -~ ,i ': ~j~-~~. ~:iGt:~::
, 4. i ,l:', ,/ J
\ -------tripi' Llimm' r:1 !
'_____ /'/f:{'-'-'---""!' : "
, J} ! '
0y,~,' :- '
'.\. "~...., ~ ---' . I,
\Y,,,,, _.,.-,
"... '<.. :or--: .~ of : __
"''i!~:;:::::::'':::'.''~:_-_=:~7~~;c~~:'-:~-=~n''ll
. ; "r~' --''',''
:--,----.,) .. ' ~ f---- -, ~
! i~:~~'.--~-'~:(?' i/I~ r'
; -- r '. " ~, ~ '
, . . , 'K\\,'-.----,
--2;-"c"'--~-=- i _.ic~~:: :
''-.
r./'J
C)
. 'I""""l
~
. 'I""""l
~
. "....,-I
~
~
,."...---~-..--".,..,._"'~.-"m.N__...""'.~_............,_,_,'
.i"".i,,:::;'t"d.;_:"
:-.'-...........
131
132
I 7-e,
FOR OFFICE USE: .. r;...J
CITY OF PORT ANGELES _~ . -"f)lJ"-1' ...-z
I~ Date ReC'd:"~ (l/.:1}/ )~o>>
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
I i~[;~ !IIVi I~ 19)1
'~
III rryer' -:-::_u ~ ~ I
APPLICA TION U UI ~ i.J I
. -
I J U N t 5 2004 I
lnv~ I
CITY OF PORT ANGELES I
. Dep!. of Community Development'
~/
Al'PLI CANT INFORMA TIC,:
APPLICANT ~/I LL I AM'S:: C;lv L J LA-P LV ; Lt-
,
53 / ~ t3 L<<e ffo}J !JeT Ct:JLti! yJ/;'/. t.. (3 /7 KAS
) I ~
APPLICANT'S REPRESEtlJAT!VE: ~A Ai N 5f;?L c/ Ie PH.#:
cr .z tf e. FR-o 1-JT' :)7'. Po t T A)J f3 Lr:S
ADDRESS:
PH. #(&11) 57 7- I~ 17
7bo:5q.
J{r-7-$S-91
WA rgjb-Z
ADDRESS:
PROPERTI OWNER (If other than applicant)
ADDRESS:
PROPERTY ThTFORMATION:
c? *-
Property address: / A R-. CB L 1
General location: C5 0 LA.. ()I-/, EO IoJ 0 (.') F Dcl
Legal description: See ATTAWe. p -
Property zoning: R ~s (0 e JJTi A l R S" - '1
Existing site areas: 5' A CJ.....Z P A {L C e:.U' <- 0 CA Te- t? IS () Tt-J. S'I 0 8..J' D FOaL 'f-u-. ~ '2. I D R
Proposed site areas: S v...j? D ( 1/( D e. 0 tV c.. 5 A C:Jt c P A ~ c. c:L ; I.J TO '! L.. oPT'.s M;I,) 7: 0 () 0 S'~ F1
~-t
II
.P F ~'u.../....ve! s-.
. q,u.. 7. r. j DR-I 've . fo KT
)
Aj..)(fELa's
Acreage in: .Streets
Parks
Other Don-residential land uses
I
Method of providing: Potable Water: CITy
Streets serving site: De. L rf' u... -z. "Z. (
Sewer:
c i l"{
,
0(2.. ( t/c:"
Signed
I (WE) HEREBY CERTIFY that] (we) am (are) the applicant(s) of the
above-described propeny and request that the proposed subdivisioD be
approved. It is understood that wilful misrepresentation will terminate the
application.
] (WE) HEREBY CERTIFY that] (we) arn (are) the owner(s) of the
above-described propeny and request that the proposed subdivision be
approved. It is understood that wilful misrepresentation of the infonnatioD
will renninate the ap JicatioD.
Signed
Signed:
Signed:
Date:
'17 ,j-- 0 c-(
.
133e:
Ut<.llo'l.OHIZD::w..ON3i :-n1O Q3...: "~d~JHI
i'1&o-LU tDK) 'X"fJ S
'0<0-'" \oor) "NOHd 3-1 V IJOSSV Z
Zgrie "". 'S'Tl3ON't' lWd
-.z = '.is "l108V]d ~ ... 'P JIAON3
;.fo9L Xl '31lIM371o~
13NNOe3nle 61f.
XJllWnl 'OIlV~ oNV /'Ivmlll
:JN3n:l
.Lf1OAYl NO!SlA!OSf1S J,HYN!l^m3Bd
T""I
:z lQ
;!
t:l
~ b
0
15 ,.,
..
z
~ w ~~ '0
" S t;! 0
b: !l'" 6''''
0.. !l 3:> <0( 0 e: w 0
~~~g~;~5 0
<( '"
o~;~:~~~
~ ~~bI;;;s8~; :
~8~~a=~~ ~
0: ~ u 1= 1=
>- ~;:'Ol~HEE .. .0
f- a II II i ~ S?
- i:J I 0
Z ~ I I! u
If)
,I I
0 ': I, :
> I I 0
I! I' !
I!
~
o
~..
;j..
0.'
~.
cdq
~q
DA TE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FO" R" T...).lN..G....E....L. E....S".
....../i/./ :.i.' .., i '../ .;. ..1:.., .;',".~;
.. '. .. . ", ...... ....... .........
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
JULY 29,2004
CITY COUNCIL . ~
Timothy J. Smith, Economic Development DieecV
Development Agreement; Green Crow Campbell Avenue Subdivision and
proposed Planned Residential Development
Summarv: In an effort to bring forward a proposeo Green Crow Campbell Ave residential
development, the City has negotiated a Development Agreement with Green Crow as authorized by
State statute. The proposed agreement provides for the City and Green Crow to share in the
improvement to public infrastructure in a broad area both onsite and offsite of the proposed
development. Completion of the proposed on site improvements and homes within the Green Crow
Campbell Ave 45 acre development would increase the City's tax base by substantially increasing the
assessed value of the property. The offsite improvements solve significant existing deficiencies
regarding sewer infrastructure North of the proposed project. The project as envisioned and
implemented through the proposed Development Agreement would be the City's first candidate for
the 'NICE Neighborhoods Prmrram as adopted by City Council in April 2004,
Recommendation: At the dose of the Public Hearing, we recommend Council authorize the
Mayor to sign the Development Agreement with Green Crow for their Campbell Ave
Subdivision and nronosed Planned Residential Develonment.
Background: Last year the City adopted a package of "low-impact" development standards in an
effort to draw more residential development into the Port Angeles city limits. During the public review
process for the revised standards, Green Crow expressed general support for adoption of the low-
impact standards and advised the City to consider additional factors that would further leverage the
City's goal to attract residential development investment, especially for certain areas within the City.
Following the adoption of the "low-impact standards, staff met with representatives from Green Crow
and began an in-depth dialog relative to Green Crow's suggestions. In exploring their suggestions,
we learned more about an interest Green Crow had in developing approximately 45 acres of
residentially zoned land within the City Limits. Green Crow's proposed development was located East
ofMt Angeles Road and South of Campbell Avenue, on land which is owned by Green Crow (see
Map).
{
In follow-up discussions, Green Crow explained certain development challenges they faced in the
Campbell Ave area such as existing deficiencies in an extensive area of existing City sewer
infrastructure North of the proposed project. Additionally, Green Crow shared cost comparisons for 1
transformer installation between the City and those that they experience in the County with the PUD.
In particular, these two issues were discouraging Green Crow's investment interest. Green Crow's
issues also suggested how the development al~5-ivate-sector investment of other large scale,
undeveloped property's in the same vicinity and elsewhere in the City may be hampered by traditional
City policy. Based on that information, and in an effort to try and bring the Green Crow Campbell
r Ave investment forward, staff encouraged Green Crow to consider submitting a specific written.
proposal. The intent of obtaining a specific proposal was to explore the potential for crafting a
development agreement between the City and Green Crow as authorized by State statute.
Green Crow submitted their proposal in October 2003, (see attached Letter, October 2, 2003). The
proposal is for a multi-phased development which includes an initial 28 acre subdivision on the
r southerly portion of the development site, followed by a proposed 17 acre Planned Residential
Development (PRD), on the northerly portion of the development site. The subdivision consists of
43 single family homes, and the proposed PRD would consist of approximately 40-50 single family
homes and 1 or more multi-family residential structures. Green Crow proposes to fully develop both
the residential building lots and the respective residential structures throughout the development site,
as a neighborhood "village" with a mix of middle class to high-end housing stock. The "village" also
includes several acres of open space and a proposed dedication to the City of 2 acres of park space.
In their proposal, Green Crow has suggested that the entire project, when completed, would add
1 approximately $25,000,000 in assessed value to the City's tax base. ,City staff generally concur with
Green Crow's approximated assessed valuation increase. Based on k set of reasonable assumptions,
as determined by City staff, an analysis of the estimated increase in valuation will be presented during
Council's consideration of the Development Agreement on August 3rd.
A nalysis: Upon receipt of the proposal, staffbegan an extensive internal review process that included
participation by all appropriate City Departments. In addition to staff review, the examination of
Green Crow's proposal also included consideration and guidance from the City Council's Community
and Economic Development Committee, chaired by Councilwoman Roger's. Councilman Pittis's
experience with residential infrastructure development and knowledge of City infrastructure, and
Councilman William's experience with local residential market values were also utilized as resources
during the analysis and drafting of the proposed development agreement.
During the analysis, considerable insight was gained that additionally helped staff understand how the
City can better position itself to attract residential development investment throughout the city limits.
In particular, insights gained through this experience has directly influenced several staff proposals,
some still under development, for proposed policy changes city-wide, such as the the NICE
Neighborhoods Program and Strategy proposed by the City Manager and adopted by Council in April
2004, as well as potential changes for transformer charges and fire sprinkler subsidies.
.
f
Throughout the review and subsequent negotiations with Green Crow, it was emphasized that in order
for their proposed project to move forward, the cost for public improvements supporting the proposed
development must be competitive with development costs for a similar project if it were developed
outside of the Port Angeles city limits. The challenge for the City is that our traditional practice has
been to have new development pay for any necessary installation and/or upgrading of all public
infrastructure, both onsite and offsite, and whether it be for new infrastructure or the reconstruction
of existing, and sometimes sub-standard infrastructure. The later has been the case in this particular
area of the City, where major land development has been, at least in part, stymied due to the necessity
of upgrading a broad area of offsite, existing sewer infrastructure. The area in question was annexed
into the City in various segments over an extended period of time, and the sewer infrastructure of
concern occurs East ofMt Angeles RoadfRace Street to approximately Liberty Street, and North of
Campbell Ave to Lauridsen Blvd. According to City Public Works, this area of existing sewer
infrastructure is at or near capacity, and on numerous occasions has already experienced backups and
overflows, (see attached Memo, April 14,2004"36
At the conclusion of the City's review of the Green Crow proposal, a response was developed and
transmitted by letter to Green Crow from the City Manager on December 8, 2003 (attached). The
response offered a position which staff considered could be supported in a subsequent
I recommendation to the City Council. Each aspect of the original Green Crow proposal was addressed
in the response. While the response did not support all of the issues or conditions that Green Crow
had requested, most of the major costs associated with offsite development were addressed. Where
applicable, potential cost impacts to both the City and Green Crow were initially estimated and
highlighted, and in certain cases, such as the costs for power, a "ceiling", or not-to-exceed level on
total cost sharing by the City was offerred.
The City Manager's transmittal back to Green Crow concluded that if the City's response was generally
acceptable to Green Crow, then a contractually binding development agreement could be drafted for
consideration by both Green Crow and the City Council. In a follow-up meeting, Green Crow and City
staff agreed to begin development of the formal development agreement contract (attached).
Funding Strategy to support the recommended Development Agreement
Potential City costs associated with the recommended Development Agreement have been updated since
the December 8, 2003 letter response back to Green Crow. The upaated costs and impact to the City
are proposed as follows:
Off site Improvements Park Ave Sewer Reconstruction (Porter to Race)
Campbell Ave Street Improvements (Mt Angeles to Porter)
$ 303,000
$ 50,000
500/0 Cost share on Power Transformers
$ 19,990
Multi-family Unit Fire Sprinkler Subsidy
48 units @ $200/unit
$ 9,600
The offsite sewer and street improvements have been incorporated into the City's recently adopted I
Capital Facilities Plan, and are currently proposed to be supported by the Sewer Fund and Street Fund
respectively.
Proposed cost sharing on power transformers is similarly recommended to be supported via the Light
Utility Fund. However, it should be noted that an anticipated change in the way the Light Utility charges
for transformers city-wide is currently under analysis by staff In the event a change in the way the Light I
Utility recovers the costs for transformers is implemented before the completion of transformer
installation for the Green Crow Campbell Ave development is done, then staff proposes that Green
Crow would receive the highest level of benefit based on a comparison between the recommended
Development Agreement and any subsequently adopted city-wide changes in Light Utility policy.
With regard to the recommended fire sprinkler subsidy, it should be noted that although the City Fire
Code in more stringent than the State Code, the City has not been providing a subsidy for multi-family {
residential development. State Fire Code mandates sprinkler systems in multi-family building of 16 or
more units, the City Fire Code mandates sprinkler systems in all multi-family building (including those
less than 16 units. For the purposes of the recommended development agreement with Green Crow, the
City cost associated with fire sprinkler subsidy would come from the General Fund. It should be noted
that staff is currently analyzing the potential for making a future recommendation that this subsidy be
available on a city-wide basis for multi-family buildings up to 15 units maximum.
Timing of proposed City obligations. and Gree, ~~w Development commitment
Apart from funding commitments, the recommended Development Agreement commits both the City
and Green Crow to certain development timing issues. For the City, those commitments center around
the installation of certain off site public infrastructure improvements. The timing commitment outlined
in the proposed agreement for the City was considered and scheduled under the guidance of the Public
Works Department. As they are outlined in the recommended agreement, the Public Works Department
is confident the City commitments can be met. In particular, the sewer commitment provides both the
City and the Developer the predictability and assurance of how much additional load may come on line
and when.
As for the assurance for the City that the Developer will bring forth and complete the multi-phased
{ development and complete the overall project, the phases have been defined under sections 3.2.1 and
3.2.2, pages 1 and 2 of the Development Agreement. And, the timing commitment is outlined under
Timing of Improvements, page 7 of Exhibit B.
Of special note, the section on Timing ofImprovements outlines how Green Crow will be committing
l to completing at least Phases 1 and 2 (32 lots) of the Subdivision portion of the overall project and will
do so within 36 months of signing the Agreement. This section ofthe recommended agreement also
binds Green Crow to making application for the PRD within 6 months signing of the agreement and
\ completing Phase 1 ( 12 lots) of the PRD within 36 months of signing of the agreement. It should be
understood that the final design and outcome of the proposed PRD and its' ultimate construction will
be subject to afuture public process. Therefore neither the City nor Green Crow can, at this time,
J guarantee that the PRD as currently envisioned will happen. However, in the event that it does not go
forward as currently envisioned, then the City's obligations for street improvements on Campbell Ave
could be nullified since they are contingent on the completed PRD. Although the recommended
Development does commit the City to the Park Ave Sewer Reconstruction project, and does so without
absolute assurance that Phase 3 of the Subdivision and Phases 2,3, and 4 of the proposed PRD occurs,
it is staffs recommendation that the City's investment in the off site sewer system go ahead since it would
resolve a current infrastructure deficiency that already has a history of being insufficient for reliably
meeting the existing residential development load,
(Finally, with respect to the proposed park, the intended site would be a centrally located 2 acre area
which would be dedicated to the City as a future neighborhood-like park. The Development Agreement
calls for Green Crow to work with the City Parks Department to provide rough grading of the area so
as to facilitate a level and clear mowing surface suitable for lawn area and children's play equipment.
Green Crow would also be responsible for the provision of utility stub outs at the park site for future
City use.
Attachments:
Vicinity and Site Map
. Green Crow Proposal; October 2,2003
· Public Works Memo; April 14, 2004
. City Response to Green Crow; December 8,2003
. Green Crow/City Development Agreement
138
e lbrl)(,/~~~1IiIU~ti' L . f .~. T~~: I; ~,;. .rJi J".
.::. 'lj,.. 1\ .~7I. ....-J.' l'A. ',If M.I. t- J" -j-- ''''I'j , .it!;2~' l\ "j .J. 'I 110~1 ',', :/'!l' ,'~: t9 1:1. I,. It
- , I \..i ,..,-...".- I.~~ -;-- Ii. h 1 '\ I I " ~.(;> I " c ;" LL.-J
--...... tP ~ I,. \ I-i ~ r -',. _ _ ~l, ,y ,_" \ ~r I '~ ~;1
~"'X' 1iII~' 1'IIl~ If 'Ill;. . I I l't'l' ......~ ~. ') : / / / I / JI-,~ ~ ~~'''' ,.:.. ~ 7~ ,'I 7/"?-Q11 ,w,.
"~.' Q-& ~ I; "/ /~/j I ../" /~/! 1/ I d /!. ,go. ~ ' ;' " "'" >-"'-"..."'" .. x.....,..' ~rr
Cl A ~~ V':< I III ...,; 'ri,' /, t J r,. ..... " " " " " ";, "'1 ,[ fG
"t-- 1// ~ ILL 'I,' ~~ ...,. , ~ . - /"" " / ,/ "..." ...... S "''''kJ'r1 ,V 1.. \"'JC'
3"rt r g..,,, .1 ' 'I~ I I I'.. 'Sc' ~ // / / , ,,",," " "," I . ( ,~ ,.,,' ~ ~ ...,'._ \.,'
o $r,A', .~~JI c.. ~/!5 ~.' ~) "'!"" · "."~~~' :/ <.J /r: ,/ ,:~~ "0.1.. "1..( 1\ ~ 1):.&11 - ~"f'; ~";-'
~ ~rs - J::::i"" ~ ~ +,/. F ~ ' ~'// /' / I~ ~f.~'~:~' .-~ . '. ..~llfIU ~ t' 'l
~,., ,~I/ ~ ~ /, ~-I;.jll/ , fz,1 1. "-' ;, , 't\~, >>1 . ~
[p .~ 1-0...- -e * 1~' ~~ , ~ ,/1 II~ f'/}1 ~,~ , \ (l,' (l" ./ /.: :;j;:" ;Z" .. '>" ...~' . 1"J ~ '
~ ~', ---~7-r-J --r-1 1- A/"'~ iillJ '1,"',1 r 11!'I,lt( "f I! / (':1).,;>5,\' ~ " ~ ...~
r: -'- - ..1' ---..;' /.:/)l ~~ ~ v '(ILQ': ';'.:~ ' I' I fi.t' ~~"7 It .~""" ',\' (.. I ( ,~, - .
',r', - / ,/ ~ I.., .', l' --,\\\\ ',' ,,;,~/. .._.,
~~' '~~tF ~ . '11.. I "~'//I,',' //, /--:: .::;.;;)) r I " . ~ r . -=-iJ' y.
.~".:: .~--, /' ("- ~ . I '/., :LILf - (l.r f, ._..,\~ \ .( ~c f-.f
,v/:;: ~~J~-\7/ '7 V.?-v7'WId.;,: ,r<!"l:JI. If/^. ." ~"""". ~ l' \. /.. ~-fJ '~
~ .~Ct"lf !:-;YJ ~;.llf~.~ 'f'./.. / 'II,.~' r~:"-~MI 1 /, J e4 1 ~F
~~ j " :~ ~'~~ ?2 v~ ~(\))l ~il.(1li~~i r,'"fJ1tf I IV I I. '-l',.j 1..'-- t\' ,I . fiT } . . j;e
J '~t ,,P;: - ~ \1-- . ,~...-- ~~;.. }fJ1I' f'! J ,I ) I . ( !.:f ~ I.. ..:,~~,
/. j I / . --- '- \ I ' 1 , " .~ I ~
--- '2l.. IV,! " /' "'... " I::IIi ,. . , ., !, .
'Sj~; :\ ~ ~ ft /u/J../J ~\ll{ ''f "$~. '~/i /I~d ,~f'~i\'b~
~~I :'~~~.,~ ~~ II IV~.. r\{ 7\f.~l rli.~ r 11/ i'm i". il ~ I ~.: , / It l--' / J /b1 . Y-~
'~~/.t'~"-" ..(,' \ /--. ,~.lll ~ <,I _~ 1 \ \ \'f'J V' J \~. ;:u /
--', ~- 7"5:-'- ~~ ... IT" l,rI{1 ~ "~. ~ \ \ I f i f)A~~~r>
:- '- - --'/ -'" -... ," ^~' ~I ~~~, ~ I 1\ .l \\ I"tl @~ ctj;)~
~~ ~~~~~" ~>. ':~ (~ \" .r it1l ~, 'j;J .. In ;I~;' / \ ~ I f\ <P-d~/"
~:~ ~~'--~~~, ',~ 'i'\ ~J.-" I' I ,-~ 1 I .I"~f rr~;r I..:,j I
.,":,~-..::::~~~"\~~,,, (" I 'l ~ :~'II .........!- t*1 \~l , ~lL it,,,:.;-:
'::::-""'\,,, ,..... "e I ~,A \ ,,,,," , '
" :-':""'<'0'" '\ ~... " · ~': ~ 1 I I.. f~ I \ . ':(}'T'
" " ~~~i:~:., \~~~~~:;.. ~ ~ '~ - . 1 '2' ~1\', " .~l...,...""Ffj'lo6: J (~~
.~ \ \"-~'~\:'--~, ,""'l.~ [(, ~~l ~ ~ I. ,'J I !( .-- t+:-r..,.
~ ~'IJ' )' ')') ~,~'.,~\:\~, .~ ......... ,-. ~~c1"" , !~." i . I ..... [ " ~' 1/),.
:: t;?1} .\ ~ ~",,\,,--, '1:, ~ ",. XI f / ,_ I P
.:~:: - -,--tJ/ / ~~\~~~~" ' ? .~~:~ ......, '. -: \: ~ / f I ia ~ ~ , ,'( ~
t/;=, =-:::1/ "'~'\":---.~~', '- ..... o/.:'}I " 'F . 1 1 ~ 1 l ..,..., bJ:J-
/1--':----- "....J I ~.........,,~, , it ,.....r:\';:, . 1:.\ .
~-:::~---:::=--::::,~---.J '-:",,~'...,":.....~,,~ - ",\!"i'J ~.:I" ,~\'- ~ '~/, II \ 1J ... ....~
.::-::::-::. ",:-.'0"" 11- -~ ~11.~1 .".,.. i: . I '- P '-<..l
.:::- c.:::::-..:~:--::>_~~~'...,~~~...:-_~ ;J)lJ;', '/Il[fl. f:' ".' & ;.~ ~ 17i I tr~\:' \ '11 \ (\: :1 J
=~~-"_- ~-,-,-- "',~,"",," K<. ./ .. -.. ~ +- 'I ~ f -.......1 ,~ \ I( " ~
---..:. .::-.::::-...::::: --.--::::..-..:..::-- - '~""~:::~........~:::~ ,-;T IJ \~ ~ ..XdI '.,& ........... ',', .~, ~
'- -:""':""---:.- >0:::::::.,-:::-"::::--- ".::::......~......~......~ l~ .. . , \ ~ I u.: ' " .1t9
:::r-=-.::-.::::- -':=:::::::::::::-8-:::"::::--- ...:::............~"::....~~~, r<::...... , ,~ ..., \ , . vA
~~ =-,::::::::..~-:.::..:::::~:::::?~~~~,\~~~ - ~'"". ~ -- ~\~ \ \ "\) . j I--t- \ '\
.::-- -- --:::::----'...-;:-..., -~":"I!"'." ...:..;:: ......... .........-.::--.~~, '. .. , L' ''1, I I II ~ ~ I ~
------------ -:::::-::::::-,~........:-,..... ~,"''''~'' ... Od 1 -\0 I 0.,,:, ~,
'::,-::,:::::::: :::::::::::::.::::~~%~~ ~~~~~'2:-::::::::::-::.~~..:-... / - I I \ ~ \ , t:-... \,
I
-..:::----=:.---- .:---:--., ~..., ~ ""'..:;::.....~.::::..~~';.,~'::::.~......-.....-~~----,,-..... '-- \"", \ \ I \ '.....: ~ -'.s
.. -. 5<_ --- ~,-.,-."..::.=.,,'-.... -_.......-. _.....,~ ~... ~ (1) ~~ ", ~ 'f! -.- , ,i i I/. " ,.'::-:. ,
~~ cI4 ~:.. ~?+ l. \\.~1. W'AA.o:a.!::'n>ttT ) )) \ '\ <> ~,,\m ,
~2.....~'~~)U~ / _~:;;~::7__~r---,r::z::..S""'::'?::?'!:~-:'~~~"""""'::';<',~ ~i;-'. \ ~:
"' 'J"'-~ ~'::::::/r/: 1~1J' DJ7\ ._\ ........~-...--..., (::-~~-:..:::,::::--............ '~", t::::1',...., ......... ................. \ f'., \ '=I' \ \
.-~ .:--............~~ . I/II~ ,/~, . \ ~......-......'1 Io-=::;=_i{~~~:::~~"\..,:::-:-....~...~,................... ,"\: ", \ ~\,~.:
\ ................... """'"- 'I'll '" t', rT1 ........,j !.f:;~......:- -"":..."":...~,S"';..::,~.............~.... \ > .... \ \ J...... L j II
\.~ ",..., ,'- III,,,' If , I' 1- ~./-:"""",-"""l-'S;'\':;:"~\\\_,,",'" \l1J II' 'Pi 'II
;0 ~ .... \,"\:....,...,'~\ "'J ...,\1 III
~ ~ 4
r"1 :;Q ;:;
"" ~ ,."
"" ~
(fJ
0
0
IV -
0 ro
q . .
;
~ II
0
q I\J
0
0
.
0>
0
0.
:?o
'C -
'--i
0-<
00
0'"
l::!~
'~O
!'~~
0):-
~,) z
I~ G)
rom
I'D r-
,3m
l ~ (f)
,.-.
o
"
o
>-
;;t
Ii!
:ll
l;J
~
>-
:::I
~
"'{J
:::0
o
'-
rr1
o
-l
Z
'1
o
:::0
s::
l>
-l
o
Z
~Q;"J
~~il
~~~~
~~~
C'Il
~ I
!;l ~
~
~
;l!
~
'"
i
!II
~
~
'"
.
~I ~
~. Cj
;g~~~i
~i~. ..
~ iiI III ~
i~j~o
~ ~!;Z
... g-<!a
~ .oj~
~ ~
~ s
i
....
r
o
(')
)>
-i
o
Z
~
)>
-0
~
~rn
~
~ 0
'u=u=i]
,./fIt-1
=
8 leg
~ IrnnJ
-'
\1__':51
._~_.~,
~ ~~~~
.. ;;l~-<
.... ~"'S"O
8 1/1' !fi
.. 2~ -
,Cl~1
-o(j
~~.1Il
~J:~a
g:!f!il~
Oi:i'c
~:::IaS!
~~=<'-
OVlIi!
r t~~ !g~ i~~
!" ~bb '-4aJ~ -'CD!2
~ ~........ ~~Q l~Q
~ ~i~ mG~ mG~
~ i ~ ~ ~ ~
~i~ fa ~ fa ~
~::I~ '" !II! '" ~
::I~~ r> P
~i~
~~~.
"'i~
~....s
%ol/l
....iiI!i!
Ei "....
iillO
lI:-iiI
1 '_
-,,1
I I to
J:tA~
I~
~
~
-t
~
~
~
519 S. PEABODY ST., srr. 22
PORT ANGELES. WA 98382
PHONE: (380) 417-0501
F'AX:. (3110) 417-0514
04AJt.: ZENO\llccrzENO\llC.NET
~ ~
~~ ~I
~ ~I
h
!IIi
"
~
1"1
rT1
....
~ llTLE:
~
PROPOSED RESIDrnnAL SUBDII/ISION OFF MT. ANGELES ROAD, PORT ANGELES, WA.
MASTER PLAN
>-
~
f\;)
C
C
...
~
o
@
CLIENT:
GRffN CROW PROPERnES, INC.
P. O. BOX 2439
PORT ANGELES, WA 98362
ZENOVIC&
ASSOCIA TES
INCORPORA lED
Green Crow J?roposal. .Octo.ber 2. 200
GREEN CROW TIMBER LLC
GREEN CROW PROPERTIES, INC.
GREEN CROW
October 2, 2003
Port An~eles City Council
321 E 5' Street
Port Angeles, W A 98362
Dear Council Members:
Thank you for your willingness to discuss our project on Camp~ell A venue with an ope"".'. :nind.
Ifwe work together, we can make this a viablt project that can be worthwhile for Green':~row
Properties, Inc. and the City of Port Angeles. If Green Crow does this project, we believf our
goals of building a quality development, that will be an asset to the communit)i for many
decades, will mesh nicely with what the city and the local community would be comfortci)le
with. .
To insure the ultimate goal, Green Crow needs to be making a profit with the project. Ifi.here is
no economic benefit from the project, eventually the quality of the project wil1 suffer, or most
likely, it will not continue. Therefore, it is very important that we start the project unde!
circumstances that give it the best chance to succeed.
That said, I would ~ike to give you an outline of our proposal for the Campbell A venue/Rook
Drive subdivision.
I hope you and your staffwill take a real hard look at this proposal and consider that it is an
outline of what we feel we need to make this a viable project.
Ifwe can come to agreement, we believe this will be a successful project. We would hope to
work through the planning process this fall and winter and be in a position to start constn'ction
on the initial phases early in the summer.
I believe the project will be very marketable once we begin and it is quite possible we could
complete all phases within 5-7 years. Obviously, economic conditions will have a great deal of
influence on build out rates, though.
703 East 8th'J389' P.O, Box 2439
Port An( JVA 98362
--
(360) 452-3325 . FAX (360) 417-3674
" ;.J,
..#::.'
'i,.\~
..":'!;
.-.. Anyway, our initial goal would be to complete the first three phases of the project by mid to late
2004, with a variety of residences, including upper end homes, mid level homes and multi-family
units. When the majority of these sell out, we would begin other phases.
From the City's perspective, the economics of this project should be very attractive. It will add
approximately 150 residences to tbe city that will have assessed values something around
$25,000.000. 1 don't pretend to understand the economics of the city, but that has to be a large
economic benefit to the city.,
Outline of proposal included.
Sincerely,
.'\ '
Dennis Yakovich
Green Crow Properties, Inc.
cc: Mike Quinn
Tim Smith
'.,~
140
Timing
120 day approval after submittal of application. If city requires more informatio:.J from
developer after submittal, 120-day approval date will not change. To have full activity
next summer, we will need approval of the project by March 2004.
Off site
No expense to Green Crow to extend sewers, water and power to any property line of
Green Crow parcel. All utilities to property lines with capacity to supply the entire
proj ect.
No street or sidewalk improvements required off site, including along Campbell Ave.
No engineering of off site utilities to be paid for by Green Crow.
Engineerin2.
Green Crow requests that city will provide engineering for power and water facilities, on
site, at city's expense. Developer will provide site plans prior to engineering and have
final approval of designs. I am assuming city can do power and waterline engineering, in
house, just as the PUD does for Clallam County.
Developer will provide engineering for roads, sewer and storm water drainage. Roads
will not require WDOT standards. Standards will be agreed to before preliminary
approval. Current specifications that affect durability of the streets are ~ acceptable to
us.
Streets
Standards for subgrade, ballast and road surfacing at current standards. The only licensed
engineering required would be for compaction tests.
Asphalt required within one year of final approval for each phase, except on the last
phase. On last phase, asphalt required prior to final approval.
Lots are sellable, building permits can be approved and occupancy permits can be granted
prior to completion of asphalt. This allows building construction to occur along with site
development. Ifdeveloper builds, building permits for those structures can be granted
pri or to final approval.
Street widths --
Minimums
Main development street
Local access
Under 200' length
141
24'
20'
16'
Maximum 6 residences
Curb and gutter at developer's option including design. Proper LID drainage methods
will take care of runoff.
Right of way widths as little as 40 feet depending on actual street width, sidev.ialk needs
and design concepts of the particular area of the development.
Cul-de-sac or hammerhead required only if life safety is an issue. If Cul-de-sac only
provides turn around for convenience, then city has the option to install at thei, expense.
No requirement for 200' street, but no parlGng allowed on those streets.
If streetlights are required, city will provide at their own lexpense except at intersections.
Utilities
It appears that electrical installation for our Rook Drive short plat cost about twice as
much, per lot, as similar projects we have done in the county in the past three years. We
need to review these costs in more detail to see what the differences are. However, if this
is really true, we will need to dramatically reduce these costs if this project is going to be
successful.
Fire Protection
City to install fire hydrants at city's expense.
No requirements for sprinkler systems. Instead, city will raise subsidy from $500 per
household to $1500 per household (or per unit, if multi family).
My understanding is that the new ordinance does not require sprinklers on existing lots in
the same area.
Let the homeowners make their own decision. Developer will help in promoting use of
sprinkler system if benefits are clearly higher than added costs.
Cost to city $1 0,000-15000/yr. less benefit to fire dept.
Wetlands
Allow us to remove all trees from wetland buffer and wetlands. No machinery allowed in
wetland. Stumps will be left.
Zoning & Density
Maintain current density of entire area by allowing multi family on portions of property
and flexibility on lot sizes, maybe d~~o as little as 3500-sq. ft., for some cluster
development. -
Vacate Porter Street that is part of our property.
Reimburse developer for cost of improvements if any improvement used by other
landowners within 15 years of completion of project.
Wave plan check fees for repeat use of plans.
..
143
..
144-
10/2/03
PO'VER COSTS ROOK DRJVE (CITY) VS. GRETCHEN WAY (COUNTY)
ROOK DRIVE: 4 Lots, Approx. 800 ft. of cable
A. City Material and labor for 800 ft, 2 vaults:
B. Our Ditching cost, conduit handling cost:
C. 800 ft, of 3 inch conduit
D. Hired Supervising Electrician (Jim Halvorsen):
TOTAL:
Per Lineal Foot:
Cost per Lot:
=7,330
=3,051
=1,100
=1.0]8
$12,499
$15.60
$ 3,125
(Note: We installed conduit, ditches and vault pads. City pulled wire and established
techillcal components of vaults, tied into poles. Conduit is always required by city for
these types of jobs. City required a licensed electrician to monitor the conduit
installation. This project was done in 2002.
GRETCHEN WAY: 7 Lots, Approx. 1440 ft. of cable
A. 1440 ft, of cable, 5 J Boxes and PUD Material:
B. Ditching, our labor:
Per Lineal Foot:
Cost Per Lot:
(Note: Tbis project was done in 1998. No conduit was needed.)
=7,852
=2.325
$10,177
$7.06
$1,453
Some Key Differences:
-Conduit required by city
-City Light Dept. says that P.U,D. buys cable in bulk, saving money
-City Council sets labor rates different from P.U.D,
145
Green Crow Properties
Campbell Avenue Project
- - - Project Soundry
S;-...~~ BPA (Righi ofW
Trail
L
rL--- '_.._n~.?l!lPl2.~~ -
~.- ------~------'--------
I.~ -: R !
i ~ ,...~ Play Field ____
~ ~ I :
... J I" 1 i
MULTI-FAMILY ~ i . I I
l1li .
-- Road
r-.
i I Lot Lines
. ~ ':'.'
u
~
\--
\
\
--I
u_-.
------1
,
---.-t
I
-. -I
-. 1
'. t
.... ~~. -----,I
~ /
-'" /
-'.
~, \.
146
.
'0
~~
-{
~
~
1\1emo April 14. 2004
~I /0'. .R..jTr:p;.. /. N' ..C' 'E.iLr El'S'.'
/..": ~ ;' 'c ~: <. ~ _. '. > ".'
: -...".<<' ". . :' .' .. . ' , :~
_I / .. . . / . .. ..../ . .... .- ... ..
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
DATE: April 14, 2004
To: GLENN A. CUTLER, D1RECTOR OF PUBLlC WORKS AND UT1LlT1ES
FROM: GARY W. KENWORTHY, PE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OFPUBLlC WORKS AND UT1LlTIES/ClTY
ENG1NEER
SUBJECT: PARKA VENUE SEWER SCHEDULE AND COSTS, RACE TO PORTER
The existing sanitary sewer in Park Avenue is overloaded and cannoi accommodate additional
connections until critical sections are replaced. This sewer section also is a primary cause of backups
and overflows that can occur wben the system is overloaded during extreme weather conditions.
Replacement of this section will not only facilitate economic development in the area but will also
have the side benefit of reducing the financial and environmental impacts associated with backups
and overflows.
Future development in the area south of Park Avenue, east of Race Street, is constrained by this lack
of adequate sewer capacity. The main constraint is a flat sloped section of 8" main between Race and
Porter Streets. In order to facilitate development in the area it has been proposed that the City
reconstruct this section of sewer. Completion of this section will facilitate the Green Crow
Subdivisions south of Campbell A venue (43 currently proposed and 42 future units), New View
Subdivision 14 units) John Ralston Subdivisions (8 current plus 12 pending units), proposed
multifamily (24 units) on the parcel north of Park and west of and adjacent to Park View Villas, along
with other potential residential/multifamily in fill construction in the area. Without including the
unknown in fill development the above pending development totals 143 units.
The sewer replacement project from Porter to Race is currently under design. The sewer replacement
design also includes design of future widening, curb and gutter, and storm drainage from Porter to
Race which could be included in the project if grant funding is obtained. The design is scheduled to
be completed by July 2004 and the sewer replacement could be under construction and be completed
by the end of this year. Consideration should be given to delaying the sewer project until summer of
2005 to permit City staff to pursue grants for the added sidewalk and street improvements. In prior
correspondence, based on our design consultants capacity review, we had noted that 6 units could
currently be added directly to the Park Avenue line west of Porter without significant upstream
irnpacts. Our consultants review further recommended however, that no new sewer services should be
added upstream of Park Avenue without completion of the sewer replacement project. On a case by
case basis a limited number of building permits could be issued with the understanding (Signed
Acknowledgment) that certificates of occupancy would not issued until the Park Avenue line has been
replaced.
Currently the sewer system under n0l111al weathe14~ditions can handle the areas flows without
backups throughout the year. We have, in the past, t _ ienced backups and overflows during
extreme wet weather conditions (Heavy rain and rapid snow melt conditions). An earlier sewer
replacement on Grant Avenue has relieved some of the backup problemson that street. Completion of
the replacement project would reduce the prospect of future damage claims and fines for backups and
overflows in the area.
The following is a breakdown of the overall Park Avenue project costs:
Phase I: Design of Se\Ver, Storm, Widening, Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk; Porter to Race
$ 68,000
Phase II: Construction of Sewer Replacement; Porter to Race
$235,000
Phase III: Construction of Widening, Storm Drainage and Sidewalks; Liberty to Race
Storm Drainage $145,000
Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk $170,000
Widening (8' North Side) $ 38,000
$353,000
Total
~ooo
$656,000
It is suggested that Phase II be scheduled for early 2005 construction. Phase III should be delayed
until grant funding is obtained to reduce City costs. The 2004 budget includes $465,000 ($45,000 for
design and $420,000 for construction) for the Park Avenue sewer replacement. The project was not
identified in time to be included in the Wastewater Bond. It is recommended that the Phase II be
executed utilizing reserves and CFP funding. Suggested funding sources include the following:
Phase I: Design of Sewer, Sidewalk and Street Improvements (Porter to Race)
Complete July 2004
2004 Residential Infrastructure Development; GG03-03 ($50K)
2004 Sidewalk matching funds; TR74-99 ($25K)
$50,000
$18,000
Total $68,000
Phase II: Construction of Sewer only (Porter to Race)
Construction start August 2004 and complete November 2004.
2005 Annual Repl. Lines; WW27-99 ($235K/2 year program)
Total $235,000
Phase III: Construction of Street and Sidewalk Improvements (Liberty to Race)
Design(Liberty to Porter) complete March 2005, Construction start April 2005
and complete August 2005.
Sidewalk Grant; WW07 -00
School District Grant Match; WW07-00
Carryover 2004 Community Projectsb GG05-03 ($115K)
City Sidewalk Grant Match; wwb~oo ($25K)
In Kind City Design (Liberty to PorttIr, Inspections, & Management
Total
$150,000
$ 20,000
$115,000
$ 25,000
$ 43,000
$353;000
This year we will be applying for WSDOT (May) and/or TIB (August) which could provide up to
$150,000 in grant funding for Phase III. By using $20,000 in school district funding and remainder of
City funding as noted for a large grant match (57.5%) we should score well in the selection process.
In order to utilize the grant funding, if successful, we would need to delay Phase III constmction until
the funds are available in the spring of 2005. We will know if the grant is to be flmded in November
2004. An overall construction cost savings could be realized by delay of the Phase II construction to
be combined with Phase III and constructed in spring/summer of 2005. This would be a recommended
action if the upstream residential developments are not scheduled to need sewer service until early
2005 after the winter rains.
Sewer related system charges ($745) and sewer connection fees ($95) totaling $890 will be cojlected
for each residential sewer hookup. With 150 potential hookups this totals $133,500. These sewer
costs would be paid by the home owner or developer as part of the building permitting process.
. Should additional funding recovery by desired for the sewer replac~ment implementation of a
developer recovery agreement (DRA) in which the City would be tHe developer could be considered.
. With the DRA the City could recoup the sewer design and construction costs as each home or living
unit is permitted. Assuming $240,000 of applicable final costs and a potential of 150 residential units
within the DRA area over the next ten years area the cost per unit would be in the range of $1 ,600.00
each. Total system charges, connection fees, and the DRA would total $2,450.00 for each residential
sewer hookup.
Copy: Mike Quinn
Tim Smith
.
N:\PROJECTS\04-04 Park Ave Sewer Improvements\schd-$-development.wpd
149
..... /1",:"-:,,4.0 --'''~'''''"''' /1..1...."...//'
-- '.. ./ " r~ i' ,;~;;-~~-J I.~ ~
'{ ';<';1' .ff'':.,- "'i;~. ",;.". / / " " :0~':> /C-F / 'N , "'"0.
' H"\/" 6'0,S~>V /' .....:'~ .s'i.~,,'>.( " t. .-, ...~. if..., -,:'-\\:::-'-1:.11
I':r:::.~--:., J 1/ ;;-;.:'f t ~ ... /..... ... ~~./" ....~ ....... . .... ./."i --. __ _,~_f,,.;-"..;._~:::-...... '~I" .....~
"-1');;;-"", .. . ~""--"C~' '. _. _ /f ". _ _ '____._ .\v.... ,
,. "'(;'. ~I If ,. N'''' _.... ". .' .. , " _'. ,. , ^
U 'I/.n.... :,' ," .,.'.1 II" , . ,/",/_~.. _..,~I :".~. fit,; ...'. ,- ......'..!,. 1"1
'.' /:U/,. I. ~!.. 'I"... .'/'. / ." Fi:. - ..'.. , . 'J
"'i'. '1 .. ~ . .. '... , / " ... ~"-<'/ /~!' _, _ ... ~':.(,:j' .. ..<'_ :.~. " /1:
4; 't,.................... .~, ;..1/.. .'.."'--" '//-"~..., -, ..... / ,. .flti-.
(--'~.;I ,7--". /1",~ '...., /"" ..'.' .; ... '>-,J ..~ .. ''')--:._.. I~'" ,:::>;:.,:,.' ,N ..' . '. \( ~--.: ,I.,>...... "
111;i;;-. ..' / ,/'" "" / / /1'" :.... '-,., / ../ ~ :..........:' ...:.......v ..~.;{~~~.. ;,,/" \""'\ -:.rl-.
-171" ..... ,~.. ....... /. Y".'~ ,. :"_, ~._ .?, .. "?>', _/ "
:;'j'!.I ~',~,~ '~"'l A' '- , / r3-'--" "_ ".. ~<, ' \ '--,(.;.~ ......~
[;. 'I 1 ,.... . / ,,,," --;. '...' ;--\. -' I-J -"~. ", '-0- , I' ~,) ,
;' II ' .~'w~, //'." '" \' '''''. '7/"" ,. .. ,_~ ,',;~; ~:<!~... '--... ,'/
~; ~J: /~' ""00 ",f ....... '--...< , !!; ..,,fj ";"-,.. ','; ,,_,// ~.J.,/"/-'61i; ~
I' ('-., . .Ob<- "< '~', I ......., '". /::-' / i;!::>~' ~ '-,/.., '';:_oC,;':: .",,'<',_ " ,_.<' loS,"!. ," --.;---:~
/,1 "'{.s't /i'.": ---.,.", /,:,,!,' '.1, "'\ 'v _
/ ....... . II'"' .'0)'--....'____ I~u 0;' ..f' '-':~,>~'5:~".. . ..
',-, ~""~I> \.., ../' 'I".'iQ ....\,., ". ;.~..'.:'.f::~-- / ) .....t" ,
I '''':~~-' ..........:<... - .... : <j'-.,....\.;,,<: ,/ ,', -~. ./ /,. '" ''-I... .. ...
'1 '.!;~t's:" ''''; >;Vi ~;;'.^ _ ~":r".;~~
~ }~_:~::~1[~~~~~~~~t~~~ .:,;y/:'c~~~~:'~
I \ -- t .. ~ 1 "I. ~______ ---..:..... r . ,_. ... ..
\. 0;:::..-,\\ \ I. f. ----, fa /.- ,8uriCiS:---en ______ _ . _ ___ ./. '.~. .. .. t
'\' ,- - // . . e/'~' - ---""-(j" 4
\, \ . "c--.. r.:..~ '0>-_- -.. .. -'. : ~d ~_, "f ' ... ..
\'\ j,\ ~'-:..5 ~'~I'.!~ r~/ ~~~/ ',,-- 7.';-: :.'--.":": . ;Ii!' -------\l~~.')>
\ .:;E. .' c } J'" , .',.....<::: / t Ii ~ ., _~~__ ~
~'(, ~\ i= ;-.1'''' '1\ / tI I _/ ~-_J(
l~<::--- ,:~ '~!~ ~i I --.,.. It 'I U)! __
-,r~_\'~~ I~ J ., ~!k_(O;. t\~ fJ
'1- .. 1_. '. ,/'1 r. r:., "I II I, ..01
;:l,-:;:. - I / ,'\,. ", ~ '. ::i
"1\- J~: - - - - - - _ _ l 'P"k'M~.'-":; ...1' J
_tY]~J~~lr!I~~~~~~f;lr'
",,_~'High'and'AV~1 -'::::: -_1 L.i 11
\Ql// I, '/ ,. " I' I, i)
,\, )!% I ! 1 ,__-:;:.-:;:.
" J~ 1%' . f I J /
(~Il~r . { II~= a'"'[._ ."';7r-~;I' \\ : lil
- ~ H. I /1 '. ,; f Ii ,/~; 'I 1 ';, I ~ I
,;- - ~ '~~o. ---'-'" - '\:. _ 'j,.. .G:;'1).",~<. ::' 1 _ L"J _ lJ.,. -_ _, u .'\", _'_', '1 i _
1, ~ I{ /1 llii )' 'I '/ Ii ':ii1r-'-" ----- Q '____, -_-1..!.I' 1 <
" I \~. 111/' III1 ,;...j I\_~IIJ II 111 ,'''-':::..~---. U ...... I--~-'~-i
(,-', / I ~\ r,f IJ / VA\. /1.--'11 II .r;/if · '\ -i II \ I '__
:-/,,'\,,' \\. . I ;'!ilr~ /I /1 1/ -"/I!; , ~ " t,J
, ',- \\ I, # Ji t-- l'~ -'-1 \ I' \\
~,'-.... )1 II'~ /j r J 1 t'\ J'I --- \, i: ';:"
~~ I:~~ ',~ . J I.~=~.. 'i:1 ';';:))"'==-"1-;:---=-) ....":.-:-:::o::::-'--":.~"':.
II ,,-__ 0:-:1 II Ii
~ \~--- - ~ Ir--. -1 /t:.,~,\ \,
I 11-~1) '-'_ )1 (~~) 1\ _--"if ii'~,- \\
l \, II i :-1 '-, \,1, "II, ,1 .1 _,;,-~",_" ,,;-_"':.'"
(/\ - "-:--( ~LLc.QI~~ /,.....; .~:~~tL_-_ \1/';_ -''''-'::..'::..'::..-:::.____ -j'/ '-'::--_~-=--=-_,_
I \(~. - - . - . . .. I ., - . - - - a - - . _ . -.r _'.' .( _____--=--""-_,___
II \'" Jf -'J t !'!VT ): :0 1*' .:.. _ ),i. _____"'-"-'--""-'_;.~'_;.""___==__
// '\ 'a.----..~?'-___...-.,-.._~_I]_J ;-'\-,,11
/ ff-""-- [' i, f' !. ,,-. ill
\~; - J I.Crai9.Ave._.;'q'~ " .: If.~..!''--.!!.._t..ll.-
rr-. ~-. -. - .. .. 'l-~~-;;=;r,,-..y..-- :;'';;:' r . - . ., a~ ,---------_
'Ii Y ",'j':-' ;.,_I;-lil').f !
It , (1)1 .., ,l-, 'V ---- -J ' I
d - \ ,-- '-I I. J J ___.___,~ _____._._
2':':-:,--_ "-C~I" - -.; .. ""\ '~-.--"EI -"!.~.. - .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. ..! J r'::.-,
- '!!- . , if
!f~':"'~:1 '1 t!' II
_ III .. ... .,; ... .
,f
j', -'~.l: ' .. " ". .'. 'l/", .' ,/ '
._-)f:,:"J-"'1;-' ?"':-\~7~7:::~~I';::-0;?%~J ~~m0; ~' --' ~:' ~~ / 'i.!
",,'- -,. l~"," r, \\'l/" ,/ / I, /.// 'I.c
;:~";'-;--h'J'~"~-'" ~~~\.~~~<~-~~~-,_" /, : " :!l
,-, .... . · .-. ./ \\ //L ! , .'i~ ,
:=Jt~: :c;:-! :~-, ! ~t , ~ -.::i,
:}:~::<>;~ -~, i; \~~i~'~'~-'" ,i ~' ) ~;f
.. ..~. I "\'--. ,W" ~~ ,,'
'VT',' ! "7 :'. : 'i '~".,,'"''
I' I \~'\ I r "~"~ "\
. ':'1'i : \',\ :, \~': "1".':' ."
!Ii ! :
!'k--Go"C:;- : \ ~":\,."".. i
=,,,,,,,--2<:1 !..:
f!
i..i
=J
~-~I
i\
pI;
""',"':'/
if
.. . intended (0 be used 05 a ~ c:.n.' 'pllOn.
ThIS map IS nal h Ci of Pan Ang.tes for irs ""'n "Ie and purposes,
This map/drawmg IS pr~llCed ~~ I ~. ryholl no' be the respon.fibility ol,he CITy.
Any other IIse of ,hiS mapura\llng s
Yertical Do/1m' '" NAVDiJ{i
Hon"zonra/ no,,,,,, '" NAD 8J~
6
N
490
Feet
Legend
Prop'NW Main
~~ln.
Exst VVW Main
.. .. - ..
City Bndy
i~~;';;~~~~i.
,'L:~'...~:~~-~I
w
Parcel~
~ORTANGI
Citv Response to Green Crow December 8.200:
WAS H I N G TON,
U. S. A.
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
December 8, 2003
Dennis Yakovitch
Green Crow Properties, Inc.
703 East 8th Street
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
Re: Development Agreement Proposal- Campbell A venue Project
Dear Dennis:
Thank you for your patience and cooperation in working collaboratively with the City on a new
development proj ect in the vicinity of Campbell Avenue and Porter Street. Green Crow has an
interest in constructing a quality development, but must be able to assure its financial feasibility.
The City desires to enhance its assessed value and encourage development, but must be able to
justify public improvements through increased private investment. While there is risk to both
parties, there is also mutual benefit, especially in having the opportunity to create a quality
neighborhood improvement. It is my belief that Port Angeles must stimulate economic
development for the long-term goal of improving community value in both financial and livability
terms.
As a new program to encourage infrastructure development that expands opportunities or corrects
deficiencies, I am proposing that your development be the test project for a new program called
NJCE Neighborhoods. This program stands for "New Infrastructure for Community Enhancement
to Neighborhoods". Similar to other programs like tax increment financing or other economic
incentives, the NICE Neighborhoods program is applied to those projects which significantly
increase neighborhood valuation. The significance is measured as returning estimated
incremental taxes at full development sufficient to cover the public's investment in off-site
infrastructure improvements within six years. The program is dependent upon budget
appropriations, and other details to be determined through Council policy. However, I believe
those basic principles will be well received by the City Council in terms of policy direction.
Tbe following response to your request for specific support in a development proposal has taken
staff to new areas of policy and operations analysis. Since our first meeting on this subj ect on
July 29th, I have had staff review every item as to its impact to the City and how we could partner
with the development community for public benefit. I believe our response is rather amazing in
Page I of 10
321 EAST FIFTH STREET. P. O. BOXl5T. PORT ANGELES, WA 98362-0217
PHONE: 360-417-4500. FAX: 360-411 9. TTY: 360-417-4645
i="-MAII. C:ITYMGR(a)CI.PORT-ANGELES.WA.US
tenns of new approaches to assisting development. While we were unable to support all of your
requests, we have detennined ways to support most of them; and certainly tbe majority costs of
off-site development issues which have long stymied development in the area.
I ask tbat you review the following response and that, if acceptable, we jointly draft a
development agreement for City Council consideration. This will give you security to move
ahead in the development application process as to the parameters of known City staff support.
If there are some minor issues in need of clarification, I am happy to meet with you. I feel we
should move forward in the process and am confident that any outstanding issue can be resolved
at the Council level.
Green Crow Development Proposal
A.
Timing:
I
l
1. 120 day approval after submittal of application. If City requires more
information from developer after submittal, 120-day approval dates wil/not
change. To havefull activity next summer, we will need approval of the project
by ~M arch 2004.
Response:
The 120 day approval is acceptable after submittal of a complete application. We will
assist in the guideline requirements and infonnation to enable application completeness.
We will allow minor information adjustments without impacting the deadline.
Direct cost impact to City: Staff time.
B. Off-Site (Improvements):
1. No expense to Green Crow to extend sewers, water and power to any property
line of Green Crow parcel. All utilities to property lines with capacity to supply
the entire project.
Response:
(a) Water and power utilities are already in the public rights-of-way within acceptable
access to your property parcel. There is sufficient capacity in those utilities to
service your project.
(b) Sewer capacity has been the obstacle to development in this area and is a problem
in terms of capacity and cost. I do not believe that this is the responsibility ofthe
developer to correct an existing problem. Ifthe capacity were sufficient to serve
the neighborhood and your development increased the density capacity beyond the
Page 2 of 10
152
norm, then I believe the developer has some responsibility to address the added
capacity improvements. However, in this case it is my belief that the problem is
pre-existing to your development and that we cannot even add a small number of
homes to service the existing land use without causing some capacity disruption
to the cvrrent neighborhood. Therefore, the City will construct the necessary off-
site sewer improvements to service the area. This is in-line with my proposal to
the Council to endorse this program of utilizing public infrastructure to
strategically encourage community development and growth of our tax and service
base.
Direct cost impact to City: CFP estimate at $350,000.
2. N street or sidewalk improvements required off-site, including along Campbell
,venue.
Response:
(a) Campbell Avenue adjacent to your front property line is considered your frontage
and part of your on-site development responsibility. While current zoning and
arterial designation would require a wider roadway, we have flexibility within the
PRD process to allow less. The current street width is approximately 20 feet and
we propose the neighborhood arterial standard of 24 feet paved width for that
western half of your parcel that fronts on Campbell A venue. This would also
require a walking path, which would be useful for access to the proposed park area
and school route extension to the west of Porter Street on Campbell. The
estimated cost to your development, assuming a PRD, is $16,330 for these
frontage improvements, including ditch, culverts, gravel walkway, driveways, and
four (4) feet widening. This is a savings of over $40,000 from the current zoned
standards.
You may note, while not on the latest set of plan concepts, we talked about the
addition of a park site in an area adjacent to your frontage on Campbell avenue.
This would be viewed as a favorable component of the PRD plan; and it was
desired in your initial planning concepts. With the walking path and City's
commitment to improvements to Campbell A venue west of your property, this
concept would fit in very nicely as an amenity to the neighborhood. Due to your
overall density, this would be a likely requirement of the PRD.
(b) Off-site improvements to Campbell Avenue west of Porter Street are proposed to
be handled by the City. This will allow a coordinated development to better align
the street rights-of-way and complete school walking route improvements for a
walkway. We will apply similar arterial standards of 24 foot widening with a
gravel walkway.
Direct cost impact to the City: $24,840.
~p3" ')f 10
(c) As a new proposal addition requested by the City, we feel the aesthetics and
function of these roadway improvements to Campbell A venue would be enhanced
by a 0.1 foot overlay. This would help market your development with the
appearance of a new street while the actual improvements were not necessary for
that level of look. The estimated cost impact is $14,000 for your frontage along
Campbell Avenue. The City would take care of the off-site o'/f.:rlay on the
remaining portion to the west.
Direct cost impact to the City: $24,000.
(d) No improvements to Porter Street will be required, conditioned upon there being
no access to Porter Street in the final PRD site development plan.
3. No engineering of off-site utilities to be paid for by Green Crow.
Response:
All off-site and frontage improvements discussed above in Bland 2 would be engineered
by the City. I propose this since we are attempting to continue improvements down
Campbell Avenue to the west of your property and we should just coordinate the widening
and walkways into one comprehensive design, rather than separate ones.
Direct cost impact to the City: Up to $50,000 in engineering and/or staff time.
C. Engineering:
1. Green Crow requests that the City will provide engineeringfor power and water
facilities, on-site, at City's expense. Developer will provide site plans prior to
engineering and have final approval of designs. I am assuming City can do
power and waterline engineering, in house, just as the PUD doesIor Clallam
County.
Response:
(a) The City provides engineering for the power system, but we do charge the
developer fees which are intended to cover costs.
(b) The City does not provide engineering services to private development on-site for
water improvements. Our experience indicates that a civil engineer has basic
experience with streets, storm, water and sewer connections, etc. It is more cost-
effective for one engineer to coordinate all such designs. However, as noted
above, power design is more specialized and not as common, so the City does this
engmeenng.
~A..A of 10
2. Developer will provide engineering for roads, sewer and storm water drainage.
Roads will not require WSDOT standards. Standards will be agreed 10 before
preliminary approval. Current specifications that affect durability of the streets
are Em acceptable to us.
Response:
The City agrees with this approach and will incorporate our recently revised low-cost
impact standards.
D. Streets:
1. Standards for subgrade, ballast and read surfacing at current standards. The
only licensed engineering would befor compaction tests.
Response:
(a) Current low-cost impact standards will apply.
(b)
The City requires a licensed engineer stamp on the design plans in addition to the
compaction tests. The requirement is a function of the professional ethics and
requirements of being a licensed engineer and being responsible for the work.
You will be using an engineer for road, sewer, water and stOlID drainage anyway;
it only makes sense that the plans are stamped by the engineer responsible for the
work or directly supervising the work. The City is performing off-site
improvement engineering.
"''--'''':.;''
2. Asphalt required within oneyear offinal approvalfor each phase, except on the
last phase. On last phase, asphalt required prior to final approval.
Response:
This is acceptable, but the developer is responsible for maintaining the gravel roadbed for
the one year period prior to paving.
3. Lots are sellable, building permits can be approved and occupancy permits can
be granted prior to completion of asphalt. This allows building construction to
occur along with site development. If developer builds, building permits for
those structures can be granted prior to final approval.
Response:
This is acceptable.
J}1Q, of 10
4. Street Widths:
Alain development street
Local access
Under 200 ft. length (max 6 units)
Response:
24 ft. minimum
20 ft. minimum
16ft. minimum
The 24 ft. and 20 ft. minimums are consistent with our low-cost impact street standards.
We have previously talked about the 16 ft. widths and expressed a reluctance to go there
due to public safety and public service concerns; however, we also did not want to cause
layout and design access problems if they could be avoided by such a change. We do note
that the most recent preliminary design layout avoids the use of such small streets. With
a PRD process we have more flexibility for layout design and feel that we can avoid the
need for 1 (i ft. street widths.
5. Curb and gutter at developer's options includillg design. Proper LID drainage
methods will take care of run off.
Response:
This is acceptable. Once again, with a PRD, the drainage can be handled with more
solutions and alternatives that meet our mutual interests.
6. Right-ol-way widths as little as 40 feet, depending on actual street width,
sidewalk needs and design concepts of the particular area of the development.
Response:
This is acceptable within the review of a PRD. The important point here is that we are
willing to move off the standard 60 ft. right-of-way and allow less depending upon the
design impacts. For example, Rook Drive may function better at a right-of-way greater
than 40 f1.; but the cul-de-sacs may function fine with this right-of-way. We also notice
that you have predominately relied on 50 ft. right-of-ways in your latest preliminary
design; and this is quite acceptable to us.
7. Cul-de-sac or hammerhead required only iflife safety is an issue. If cul-de-sac
only provides turn around for conven ience, then City has the option to install
at their expense. No requirement for 200ft. street, but no parking allowed on
these streets.
Response:
Cul-de-sacs would be required on non-through streets to facilitate safe and efficient traffic
flow. Fire Code requirements stipulate that dead-end roads in excess of 150 feet must
have a turn around area. We believe this would be desired by residents, their visitors, and
199.h ')f 10
of course it facilitates public safety and public services. Once again, your most recent
design utilizes cul-de-sacs, and we are willing to work with you on radius design.
8. If streetlights are required, City will provide at their own expense, except at
intersections.
Response:
This is acceptable, and streetlights would be used at intersections for traffic safety.
E. Utilities:
1. It appears that electrical installation for ou~ Rook Drive shart plat cost about..
twice as much,per lot, as similar projects we have done i" the county in the past
three years. We need to review these costs ill more detail to see what the
differences are. However, if this is really true, we willn.eed to dramatically
reduce these costs if this project is going to be successful.
Response:
For comparison purposes, I asked Public Works to propose a cost comparison, using your
preliminary plat design, for City electrical versus Pun electrical items. The cost
comparison is estimated below:
Item Description
Material
Labor
Equipment
Connection fee for 18 transformers
City Cost Est.
$ 83,400
26,600
12,400
o
$122,400
PUD Cost Est.
$ 46,216
21,504
9,840
4.860
$ 82,420
The significant difference is in the price of materials where the PUD does not charge the
developer for transformers, where the City does. The PUD incorporates this development
cost into their overall rate analysis for the system. While the two agencies approach this
cost of development in opposite ways, it appears to me that a compromise solution may
work best in being an incentive for development and being responsible and fair in our rate
impacts. The City designs the development of the power system, and the transformers
become a component that will vary in their size to serve multiple lots depending upon the
design layout and service load. For all our public utilities, we own the infrastructure to
which the customer connects their private service line. In this case, the transformer
becomes that public connection point. Since the City controls the design components and
assures compatibility for service load, and there is a policy directive to encourage
expansion and growth ofthe City, I propose that for this PRD the developer and City split
t~l~,f 10
equally the cost of the transformers as meeting our respective interests in an equal climate
of partnership. I further propose that the City review its policy and operational
components for electric rate analysis to incorporate this change in policy for future
developments meeting a set of criteria to be established later.
Direct cost impact to the City: $19,990.
F. Fire Protection:
1. City to installfire hydrants at City's expense.
Response:
The fire hydrants are engineered as part ofthe water system by the developer. We believe
this cost of fire hydrant installati(:m to be relatively minoT to the project and should be part
of the developer responsibility. We will, however, evaluate the required 500 ft. hydrant
spacing to allow us some design flexibility with the developer for reasonable deviation
from the standard.
2. No requirements for sprinkler systems. Instead, City will raise subsidy from
$500 per household to $1500 per household (or per unit, ifmulti-family). My
understanding is that the new ordinance does not require sprinklers on existing
lots in the same area. Let the homeowners make their own decision. Developer
. will help in promoting use ofsprinkler system ifbenefits are clearly higher than
added costs. Cost to City $10,000 - $15,000 per year less benefit to fire
departm ent.
Response:
Our municipal code requires new subdivisions outside the four minute response area to
have residential fire sprinkler systems. Since your proposed subdivision development is
within our response area, there is no requirement for sprinklers in single family and
duplex units of your development. If an individual homeowner desires to install a
sprinkler system, the City offers a $500 rebate as an incentive since we support the
superior life safety benefits of such a system. Weare not inclined to raise this rebate to
$1500 as you suggest for single family units.
With regard to multi-family units, said fire sprinkler systems are required per our code,
and we support this requirement based upon the clear benefit life safety in such multi-
family density development. However, as a new proposal, we will support a $200 rebate
per individual multi- family housing unit up to a maximum of 16 units per building. This
would require an ordinance amendment by the City Council, but we are confident oftheir
consideration of such a proposal. The reason for limiting the incentive to multi-family
buildings with less than 16 units, is that State Fire Code requirements cover buildings with
Page 8 of 10
158
units of 16 and above as a mandatory installation. Since our municipal code requirement
is more stringent than the State's, we would offer some rebate to the developer on the cost
of meeting our municipal requirement.
Direct cost impact to the City: (48 units of MF)
G. Wetlands:
$9,600
1. Allow us to remove all trees from wetland buffer and wetlands. No machinery
allowed in wetland. Stumps will be lefL
Response:
The City will support removing the trees but leaving the stumps in the wetland and
adjacent wetland buffer area. We are willing to remove the trees for view enhancement,
but we want to protect the basic land area functioning as a wetland buffer.
, I
H. Zoning & Density:
1. Afaintain current density of entire area by allowing multi-family on portions of
property and flexibility on lot sizes, maybe down to as little as 3500 sq. ft. for
some cluster development.
Response:
The PRD zoning process allows us flexibility to entertain your request. The PRD also
requires other considerations such as open space allowance in order to secure flexibility
in density design. The City will provide all pertinent zone information.
2. Vacate Porter Street that is part of our property.
Response:
We understand your need to maximize your available property for useful development.
While we can accommodate vacation of your portion of the Porter Street right-of-way, we
must first determine if any other property owner requires use of Porter Street for their
property access. We will explore this impact as infonnation for your completed
application.
3. Reimburse developer for cost of improvements of any improvement used by other
landowners within 15 years of completion of project.
Response:
The City's standard Latecomer's Agreement to allow other benefitting property owners
to reimburse you for usable improvements off-site is 10 years. In this particular
'599 of 10
agreement, the City has agreed to absorb the pertinent off-site costs, so a latecomer's
agreement is really not necessary. Since you are not investing in significant off-site
improvements, we cannot support a significant change in the agreement payback period.
We will certainly allow a Latecomer's Agreement, ifneeded.
4. HI ave plan check fees for repeat use of plans.
Response:
This is acceptable.
I look forward to hearing from you on this response to your development proposal. The City has
come forward with public infrastructure development and engineering of over $400,000 in value
to create an opportunity for your developJl1ent project to be successfill and improve the
neighborhood's value.
Sincerely,
Michael Quinn
City Manager
1:\OFFICElWPWIN\MYFILES\CM Corres\Green Crow development agreement 03.wpd
~:$€)100f 10
.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
STANDARD
WORKS
DEPT.
~
~+
T
~~r
toil
I
Cl;<:
~
~
It')
~~ ~!
I..J~ ~
;::;!~
~
Cl::l::f
~
~
C)
Vi
~
"-l
....
~~
t1 :j .
.~
"-l.
... .~
"
~
'C.
~
~ ~.
l..J~
e5t.l
~l1.
U~
....t.)
~~
it~
Vj~
"" ::s :
eoV')
lr)~
~;x:.....
~~~
i!:~~
lbi:!:Q:l
~~~
~Qe:.
u~Q
~~~
~~t.l
u~~
;:~;:e
'" c:::l
~;it.)
. ~;:::
<'>./. ~
<'>./ ~.
ll;)
o
~j
4
PUBLIC
DE TAilS
z
o
.....
I-
U
W
II)
:I:
1-.
<[.
0..
I,.~
1-. x:
- 0::
=-
~
~.z
<[<[
o
[11:11\
v.J
J::IO::
W
>
<[
0..
Z
<[
Iz:a
0::. .
::::l.'
Iz:a
::::l
II)
C1 c,.-i
I- Z-J
0<[
V) ->
~ :::~vi
- l:::o.. _J
I- zo.. <:
,U 0<[
W::::l U
Z[II: Z
-I- 1011..1
-J V) ~- I-
~CXI ......~
WO 1/)-
vi ~-J z~ ~
W W-J 0
I- U <t It. II) l.?
::> :,,1..1 z
o .>-. 0:: 0-<
[11:. .<t I- J::I - U
=-z W::::l. <[
w. W I/) C!l. _'
:><:~"":L <1:1..1 0..
vi ;:;;tlo~ PlO:: I:l
~ i.. r=l ~5: ~ B:g I-
W Wt:Jl.:) ~o:: 0::
:r t- z ...... l.a... ...., < CJ
W n.We::O::>J::I_
I/) 0 OZ cr.
<[ r=l>-:rW t.J<[ It.
W <[I-rl.:) UI-.
. --Q V)Z~
:r ZU:-W W OZ
t- CJ c:Q L _ .....
<[ >-I-J::I :::ll->
It. :jtlI%>5~ ~~g~
r=l Z Zr=lJ::l:I: :rZO::
Z 0 <[W....W -....0::
<[. -J>UIXl ~~::I:VlW
J::I W. OZ. I- Z Q
WWQ>W~"""" ZWOZ
11. J::I - -J ~ It. 0 0 L.J Vl U =>
OWV:Z-It.U- ::l:W
..JW Olz:a<t W:I:Ol"'l
VlZW ...... WV) >l-rW
ZZZWI%>.... O. .U
VlO<[<[1%> ~::I:[II:<t
>- <t. - -. 0 W 0.00-1
<[ ..e::~OrZ :re::-O-
::>VlIrrr 0 -....0::
WI-I/)V) WN It.W
L.....J<tWWWZ WVl ""
O<l:lt.r=lJ::lr=l-O:: t:JZO::
:- WW<[...J<t <l:OWe:;
I-Vl!:i<lt.lt.Ct:e::W Z-WI-
:r 1..1 t:JW-J -....Z
t;Jr=l:rW.W I-U <l:<t-L.l
-Wt-r=lJ::lWZ .Q!-l:>Q
Ct::J-<{--~W::L:Qs::::J>Z"""
<[W:-:-OU:::lW WWL)
.......-, ...... ::t:>~Q -
....W .~""r=l-DO:: >-1Xl
l:>...JVlDD<l:Z:rO>-t-o::
VlDW...J ~O-Wl-Z-w
W\O><[ I 11t.~::I:O::Vl<tU:I:
I-
o , .. .. ,1..1 , .>- .
Z""NM Vlrl\DP'lr---lDP'l11\
0::
W
I-
et:
::!:
INSPEcnON REOUIRED UPON
COMPLEnON OF ROUGH GRADING AND
DURING PLACEMENT OF STRUCTURAL
SECTION,
ALL WORK AND MA TE:RIALS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE mTH CURRENT STANDARD SPECIFIC A TlONS CALL FOR FORM INSPECTION BY CITY
FOR ROAD BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTlON~ WASHINGTON STA TE: DEPARTMENT OF PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE: AND
TRANSPORTA TION. AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIA TlON. PRIOR TO PA VlNG
APPROVED BY
CITY ENGINE R
\...,...J
"-
-
Cl
l:::i
Iw)
~:}
f2 ~.
~ ~
:j ~
Cl t3
~~
Cl .
....: Cl
;..:! c::i
...
~:}
:2 ~
~ ~
~ ~
~~
Cl. :;;-
~ ~
"-~
-
...,
I
+Cl .
"'i
Cl;<:
~~
c
ti
...,
~.
~
"
~
~I
ru
'\
"5'
~
DA TE : 05/06/03
s
W
ct
:J
o
W
~
W
I%>
>-
<l:
X
Suburban Streets
162_
Green Crow/City Development Agreement
Development Agreement
1. Parties.
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into effective the
_ day of , 2004, by and between the City of Port Angeles, a
Washington municipal corporation ("City") and GREEN CROW, INe., a Washington
corporation (the "Developer").
For and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the City Cind the
Developer do hereby agree as follows regarding the Campbell A venue Development.
2. City Authority.
This Agreement is authorized by RCW 36.70B.170 and by the City's police power,
contracting power, and other authority. This Agreement sets forth terms of cooperation between
the City and the Developer in the development of the Campbell A venue Development.
3. Project Elements.
3.1 Project Location.
The Green Crow Campbell A venue Development site is an approximate 45 acre
site which is generally located South of Campbell Ave, East of Mt Angeles Road and \Vest of
Wabash Street, within the City Limits of Port Angeles, Washington. The site is more
particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
The Campbell Avenue Development may hereafter be referred to as "the project."
3.2 Project Description.
The project consists of one subdivision and one planned residential development
(PRD). They are:
3.2.1 Green Crow Campbell A venue Subdivision
A 28 acre site located in the RS-9 Residential Single Family zone with 43
single family residential building sites. Construction shall occur in 3 phases:
Phase 1 (Lots 1-8,25-33) 17 lots total
Phase 2 (Lots 9-13, 34-43) 15 lots total
Phase 3 (Lots 14-24) 11 lots total
3.2.2 Green Grow Campbell Avenue Planned Residential Development
A 17 acre site partially located in the RS-9 Residential Single Family zone, and partially
located in the Residential High Density zone with 43 single family residential building sites and
163
- J -
7 multi-family residential building sites. Construction is estimated to occur in 4 phases:
Proposed phase 1
Proposed phase 2
Proposed phase 3
Proposed phase 4
12 lots total
12 lots total
12 lots total
12 lots total
4. Public and Private Open Spaces.
A central feature of Campbell A venue Development is providing open spaces for use by
the public and protection of critical areas. There are, two types of improved open spaces
(common usable areas) within the Project: (1) dedicated open :spaces consisting of dedicated
portions of trails and park areas, and other public open spaces (that will be owned and
maintained by the City), and (2) non-dedicated open spaces consisting of park areas (that will be
maintained by the Developer or Homeowner Association), and other private open spaces outside
of the public right-of-way. A third type of open space not available for general use by the public
is found in two critical areas: White Creek ravine and a -acre wetland in the center of the
-
site.
5. Infrastructure and Utilities.
The parties agree that infrastructure and utilities will be constructed in accordance with
Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
6. Reservation.
The City reserves the right and authority to impose new or different regulations on the
project, or any part of it, to the extent required by serious threats to public health and safety.
7. General Provisions.
7.1 Governing Law.
This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws
of the State of Washington.
7.2 Binding on Successors; Assignment; Release of Liability.
This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors
and assigns of the Developer and the City.
7.3 Recording.
A memorandum of this Development Agreement shall be recorded as a covenant
164
- 2 -
running with the land and shall be binding on the Developer, and its, mortgagees, successors and
permitted assigns.
7.4 Interpretation; Severability.
7.4.1 Interpretation. The parties intend this Agreement to be interpreted to the
full extent authorized by law as an exercise of the City's authority to enter into such agreements.
7.4.2 Se,'erability. If any provisions of this Agreement are determined to be
unenforceable or invalid by a court of law, then the parties agree to negotiate in good faith to
modify the Agreement consistent with the court decision, and no party shall be obligated to
perform under this Agreement until the modification to this Agreement has been completed.
7.5 Authority.
The City and the Developer each represent and warrant it has the respective
power and authority, and is duly authorized, to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under
this Agreement.
7.6 Amendment.
This Agreement shall not be modified or amended without the express written
agreement of the City and the Developer.
7.7 Exhibits and Appendices.
Exhibits A and B are incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth.
7.8 Headings.
The headings in this Agreement are inserted for reference only and shall not be
construed to expand, limit or otherwise modify the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
7.9 Time of Essence.
Time is of the essence of this Agreement in every provision hereof. Unless
otherwise set forth in this Agreement, the reference to "days" shall mean calendar days. If any
time for action occurs on a weekend or legal holiday, then the time period shall be extended
automatically to the next business day.
7.10 Disputes; Default and Remedies.
7.10.1 Dispute Resolution. Should there arise any dispute, difference or claim
concerning the parties' performance of this Agreement, or the interpretation of this agreement, it
shall be referred to the City Manager, as representative of the City, and to , as
representative of Green Crow. Those r~e6ntatives shall negotiate in good faith to reach
achieve an amicable resolution. If the representatives are unable to resolve the dispute,
difference or claim, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only
be by filing suit in the Clallam County Superior Court, Clallam County, Washington, unless the
parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for
damages arising from the parties' performance of this agreement, each party shall pay all its legal
costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, in addition to
any other recovery or award provided by law. JURY TRIAL WAIVER: CITY AND
DEVELOPER HEREBY WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CLAIM
ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT OR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT,
WHETHER NOW OR HEREAFTER ARISING AND WHETHER SOUNDING IN
CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE AND HEREBY CONSENT AND AGREE THAT
ANY SUCH CLAIM SHALL BE DECIDED BY TRIAL WITHOUT A JURY. EITHER
PARTY HERETO MAY FILE AN ORIGINAL COUNTERPART OR COpy OF THIS
SECTION WITH ANY COURT AS WRITTEN EVIDEi-.J~E OF THE . WAIVER AND
AGREEMENT CONTAINED HEREIN.
7.10.2 Default and Remedies. No party shall be in default under this Agreement
unless it has failed to perform under this Agreement for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt
of written notice of default from any other party. Each notice of default shall specify the nature
of the alleged default and the manner in which the default may be cured satisfactorily. If the
nature of the alleged default is such that it cannot be reasonably cured within the thirty (30) day
period, and if the defaulting party has commenced the cure within such time period, then a
reasonable time will be allowed for the diligent prosecution of the cure to completion. Any party
not in default under this Agreement shall have all rights and remedies provided by law including,
without limitation, damages, specific performance or writs to compel performance or require
action consistent with this Agreement.
7.11 Authorized Agent.
Developer hereby designates its agent with authority to give
notices, approvals and otherwise act pursuant to this Agreement. Unless otherwise stated by the
Developer, representations and actions by shall bind Developer as to all property
then owned by it within the Campbell A venue Development
7.12 Effective Date and Term.
7.12.1 Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution
by all parties and by its adoption by the Port Angeles City Council.
7.12.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall continue until the earlier of any
default under this Agreement which is not cured within the applicable cure period, if any,
provided, under this Agreement or June 30, 2011, unless the Parties agree to extend it.
7.13 No Third Party Beneficiaries.
This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the
parties hereto and their respective success~66nd assigns. No other person shall have any right
of action based upon any provision of this Agreement.
7.14 Interpretation.
This Agreement has been reviewed and revised by legal counsel for all parties and
no presumption or rule that ambiguity shall be construed against the party drafting the document
shalf apply to the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement.
7.15 Notice.
All communications, notices and demands of any kind which a party under this
Agreement requires or desires to give to any other party shall be in writing and either (i)
delivered personally, (ii) sent by facsimile transmission with an additional copy mailed first
class, or (iii) deposited in the U.S. mail, certified mail post3ge ~repaid, return r~ceipt requested,
and addressed as follows:
If to the City:
City of Port Angeles
Attn:
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, W A 98362
with a copy to:
City of Port Angeles
Attn:
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, W A 98362
If to the Developer:
Green Crow
with a copy to:
Notice by hand delivery or facsimile shall be effective upon receipt. If deposited in the U.S.
mail, notice shall be deemed delivered 48 hours after deposited. Any party at any time by notice
to the other party may designate a different address or person to which such notice or
communication shall be given.
7.16 Cooperation.
The parties shall not unreasonably withhold requests for information, approvals or
consents provided for in this Agreement to the extent allowed by law. The parties agree to take
further actions and execute further documents, either jointly or within their respective powers
and authority, to implement the intent of this A"greement. The City agrees to work cooperatively
with the Developer to achieve the mutuj~ kgreeable goals as set forth in this Agreement,
subject to the terms of the Port Angeles Municipal Code and other applicable governmental
regulations.
7.17 Delays.
If either party is delayed in the performance of its obligations under this
Agreement due to Force Majeure, then performance of those obligations shall be excused for the
period of delay. "Force Majeure" shall mean "strikes, riots, judicial actions by federal or state
governmental agencies that enjoin construction on the Property, acts of God, war or acts of
terrorism.
7.18 No Partnership or Agency.
This agreement does not create any partnership or, agency relationship _between
the City and the developer. Neither shall be liable for the acts or failure of acts of the other.
7.19 Incorporation.
This document is the final written expression of the agreement bet~een the
parties. There are no other agreements, oral or 'written, that modify or imerpret this document.
This document supercedes and incorporates all prior negotiations, understandings and
agreements of the parties relating to the subject matter hereof.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
GREEN CROW
By:
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
Date:
Attest:
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
Date:
I Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
I
i
Approved as to form:
I
I
I
I William E. Bloor, City Attorney
G :\LEGAL \PJanning\Green Crow\GreenCrowDeveJopAgmt6.doc
Draft Date:July 14,2004 (4:25)
168
Development Agreement
Exhibit A
Legal Description
'\Jf:vr
169_
Draft June] 6,2004 (Rev June 24, 2004)
(Revised June 29, 2004)
(Revised JuJy 9, 2004)
(Revised JuJy 13, 2004)
Exhibit B
Campbell Avenue Development
· City Processing Of DeveJoper's PRD Application
The City agrees to process the Green Crow Campbell A venue Planned Residential
Development (PRD) application within 120 days of a determination of completeness of the
application. If City requires further information or clarifications after the determination of
completeness, the 12b-day processing, period will not change, provided developer provides
the additional information within a reasonable period of time.
· Zoning and Density
The City and the Developer agree that the zoning and density determination for the Green
Crow Campbell A venue PRD shall be subject to the PRD process and final appreval. The
City acknowledges that the Developer may seek multi- family development on some portions
ofthe project site and flexibility on single- family and multi-family lot sizes. The City agrees
to support the consideration of flexible lot sizes (not less than 3500 sq. ft. per single family
lot) subject to a PRD procedural process and final approval.
· Developer Reim bursement
The City and the Developer agree that should the Developer pay for any onsite or off site
improvements, not including improvements to public rights-of-way fronting the subject site
and proposed lots, then the City's standard policy and procedures for "Developer
Reimbursement Agreements" (up to a maximum of 10 years) shall be utilized.
· PJan Check Fees
The Developer agrees to pay the standard City plan check fee for building permits for the
initial plan check of construction design planes). Except when additional plan checks are
required due to changes in the applicable code, the City agrees to waive, for up to 24 months
from the date of the last permit issued for that plan, additional plan check fees for the
repeated use of identical construction plans for building permits.
-1-
170__
· 'Vetlands
The City agrees that it will not unreasonably withhold permission for the Developer to
remove trees in wetland and wetland buffer areas within the project provided (1) the areas
will continue to function as a wetland and wetland buffer and (2) that tree removal will be
accomplished by a method that is mutually acceptable to the Developer and the City, and (3)
tree stumps and root systems are left in place and undisturbed.
· Engineering (Onsite)
Power:
The City agrees to provide engineering for the onsite electric
distribution system, provided that the Developer will reimburse the
City for its engineering costs. The engineering cost win be
reasonable, and the electrical engine'ering will be provided in a timely
fashion.
Water
The Developer agrees to provide engineering for the onsite domestic
water distribution system.
Roads
The City and the Developer agree that standards for subgrade, ballast
and road surfacing will be at current low-impact development
standards. The City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines will
be used, and the WSDOT road standards will not be required. The
Developer agrees to provide engineering, including a licensed
engineer stamp, on the design plans and compaction tests, for the
onsite street system. Street cente- line locations may be allowed some
flexibility as to placement within the right-of-way, provided the entire
street surface, shoulder, ditches, walkways and utilities are still within
the right-of-way.
Sewer
The Developer agrees to provide engineering for the on site sewer
system at the Developer's expense.
Storm water
The Developer agrees to provide engineering for the onsite
stormwater system at the Developer's expense.
· Streets (Onsite)
Asphalt installation by the Developer may be delayed for up to one year offinal approval for
each phase of development, with the exception of the final permitted phase, provided (1) that
the Developer agrees to submit a bond or other security acceptable to the city in the amount
of l20% of asphalt installation bid for asphalt installation for each phase of development,
171
and (2) agrees to maintain the gravel roadbed in a manner acceptable to the City, and (3) the
Developer declares in 'writing to the City and homesite buyer/ovmer at the time of occupancy
approval the specific time when the Developer will complete the subject street improvements
including final asphalt installation.
The City agrees that the lots will be sellable, that building permits can be approved,.md that
occupancy permits may be granted prior to completion of asphalt instaDz.tion, pro\:ided that
the offsite sewer improvements (Porter to Race) are completed by the City in zccordance
with Streets (Offsite) and Utilities (Offsite) elements of the development agreemc:!t which
follow.
Provided that the developer satisfies the City's standard policies and proc~::dures for >surance
of the permits, the City agrees to issue occupancy permits for a maximum of.t residence"; prior to
August, 2005. \
Subject to the PRD process and final approval, the City and the Dev~]oper ag-,i;;e to the
following minimum Onsite Street widths:
Primary access street(s) (standard suburban arterial) 24ft minirr,um
Local access (standard suburban access) 20ft minimum
The City and Developer agree that no street widths are contemplated less thai.' the 20ft
minimum for local access.
Developer ALSO agrees to install, as directed by the City, UNo Parking" signs on 20 ft and
24 ft streets.
Subject to determinations made during the subdivision and the pnn process 2nd final
approval, the City agrees that curb and gutters will be at the Developer's option and design,
provided that proper drainage methods shall be utilized to manage stonnwater runoff.
Subject to determinations made during the PRD process and final approval, the City and the
Developer agree that right-of-way widths may be as little as 50 feet.
The Developer agrees that cul-de-sacs or mutually agreeable and equivalent tun~-around,
shall be required on all non-through streets in excess of 150 feet, and that the mdius and
design of any particular cul-de-sac shall be approved on a case-by-case basis, subject to
agreement by the City and approval by the City Engineer and Fire Marshall.
The City agrees to pursue a potential transfer of ownership and/or jurisdictional
responsibility between the City and Clallam County for a portion ofMt Angeles Road from
Rook Drive north to the current City Limit. Assuming a transfer is successful, then in lieu
of any roadway and pedestrian improvements on Mt Angeles Road from Rook Drive to
Campbell A venue, the Developer agrees to design and construct (1) a minimum 20 foot wide
extension of Rook Drive connecting to Wabash Avenue and (2) minimum 8 foot wide trail
172-
corridor within the project area from Rook Drive to Campbell A venue. Prior to final plat
approval, the developer further agrees to improve the trail corridor to include a minimum 6
foot wide, paved trail with underground conduit for a future (City funded) trail lighting
system.
to,.
The Developer agrees to install streetlights at each and every intersection, and potential blind
curve(s) or grade(s) within the proposed project at the Developers expense. Subject to the
final plan for street layout, should the City desire streetlights at locations other than
intersections, blind curves or grades, the City agrees to install non-intersection streetlights
at City expense. The City retains the right to be reimbursed for some or all City expenses
for non-intersection streetlights from benefitted adjacent homeowners.
. ~ .....:
. ".3
The portion of Campbell Avenue adjacent to the northerly Green Crow property line west
to Porter is considereq Green Crow frontage. If the PRD p~ocess is successful, the Developer
agrees to design and construct that frontage portion of Campbell A venue to a minimum 24
foot paved width (which constitutes a 4 foot widening of the current roadway) including a
0.1 foot asphalt overlay of the minimum 24 foot street. The Developer further agrees to the
design and construction of ditch, culverts, all-weather walkway, and driveway approaches
along the Green Crow frontage.
The City and the Developer acknowledge that both will have a responsibility for
improvements along Campbell A venue and hereby agree to collaborate on the design and
construction of their respective portions of Campbell Avenue improvements so as to achieve
a seamless end product running the length of Campbell A venue from the east point of
beginning of the Green Crow Campbell A venue frontage west to Race Street.
The Developer shall maintain the onsite and frontage roadways, in a condition approved by
the City, until such time as all roadway improvements are complete, have been inspected and
accepted by the City, and are approved by the City Council. Such approval shall not be
umeasonably withheld.
· Streets (Offsite)
Subject to (A) the PRD process and final approval, and (B) timing or phasing of PRD
construction by the Developer, the City agrees to design and construct the following elements
of offsite streets. The City's design and construction of these offsite street improvement
elements will be completed by the City within 12 months of the Developer's completion of
the entire PRD but not sooner then the dates as listed:
The City agrees to design and construct the Campbell A venue arterial (Porter Street west to
Race Street) to a minimum 24 foot paved width (which constitutes a 4 foot widening of the
current roadway) including a 0.1 foot overlay of the minimum 24 foot street, ditches,
culverts, gravel walkway, and driveways.
173-
-4-
Design
Complete not earlier th~n March 2005, not later than
July, 2005.
Construct
Complete not earlier than August 2005, not later than
September, 2005.
On the understanding and condition that there will be no access to Porter Street in the final
and approved PRD site development plan, the parties agree that no improvements 10 Porter
Street will be required. However, in the event the final and approved PRD site development
plan includes Porter Street access, then the Developer agrees to design, construct and install
and/or pay their share of reimbursement for any required Porter Street impro'jements
necessary to allow such access.
.. UtiJities (Onsite)
The City and the Developer agree to share equally the cost (materials only) fo'~ on site
transformers, provided that the City portion shall not exceed $19,990 total. A transformer
may serve up to 6 single family residences or 1 multi-family residence per tramformer.
Transformers will be placed in locations mutually acceptable by both the developer i'md City.
The Developer shall maintain onsite utilities, in a condition approved by the City, until such
time as all utility improvements are complete, have been inspected and accepted by t.he City,
and are approved by the City Council. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
· UtiJities (Offsite)
Water:
At the City's expense, the City agrees to make available adequate
water capacity to the developer's lot line, but no further offsiie water
improvements are anticipated.
Sewer:
The City agrees to design and construct all offsite sewer infrastructure
from Porter Street to Race Street. The City schedule for design and
construction will be as follows:
Construct
Complete not earlier than July 2004, and not later than
August, 2004.
Complete not earlier than August 2005, and not later
than September, 2005.
Design
Power
At the City's expense, the City agrees to provide adequate power
capacity to the developers lot line, but no offsite power improvements
are anticipated.
174
-5-
· Fire Protection
Fire Hydrants
Subject to the final, approved design of the development, the City and
the Developer agree that the installation of fire hydrants shall be at
the Developer's expense. The fire hydrants shall be designed and
located per applicable City standards. The City Fire Department shall
work with the Developer to ensure the most efficient and cost
effective design.
Sprinklers
Fire sprinklers shall not be required within single family units located
within the proposed development as the development is located
within the City's four-minute response area and will be provided with
sufficient fire flow.
Fire sprinklers will be required in all multi-family units.
The City agrees to provide a fire sprinkler subsidy of$500 per single
family household, and $200 per unit for multi-family buildings up to
a total of 15 units! ($3,000 maximum subsidy per multi-family
building).
.
Open Space and Parks Facilities
~"
Subject to the PRD process and final approval, the Developer agrees to dedicate
approximately 2 acres of park and other open space within the development to the City for
the purposes of public recreation and trail use. The layout, design and funding of the park
and open space to be dedicated to the City shall be subject to the approval of the Port
Angeles City Council.
In collaboration with the City Parks and Recreation Department, the Developer agrees to .
perform preliminary site preparation for eventual development of the dedicated site as a
future City park. Site preparation will include rough grading necessary to prepare this site
to eventually contain traditional neighborhood park elements including children's play
equipment, open space and lawn areas suitable for informal play not limited to youth
baseball, softball and soccer practice, small basketball court, landscaping, picnic tables,
benches and walking paths.
A power, water and sewer connection stub shall be installed in a location mutually acceptable
to both the developer and the City to enable future development of a public restroom to serve
the park site.
1 The State building code mandates installation of an approved fire sprinkler system for multJ~family residential
building with more than 15 units. Recognizing that, the fire sprinkler subsidy offered by the City is limited to multi-family
buildings with 15 units or fewer units.
175
-6-
The Developer and the City agree that the City will be responsible for the future, final
development of this dedicated site as a neighborhood park to serve the Mt Angeles
neighborhood at such time as the City has the resources to construct and maintain the site.
Timing of Improvements
Developer agrees to have Phase 1 of the approved subdivision completed within 18 months
of signing of this Development Agreement and Phase 2 completed within 36 months of
signing of this Agreement.
Further, the Developer agrees to make application for the Campbell Avenue PRD within 6
months of signing of this Agreement and to have Phase 1 II completed within 36 months of
signing of this Agreement.
If the project continues to be economically viable, developer agrees to have entire project
completed within 6 years of signing of this Agreement.
If for any reason costs of the project, per lot, become too high to be economically viable for
the developer, then City and Developer may negotiate a mutually agreeable amendment(s)
to the Development Agreement in an effort to work together to find ways to complete the
project, at a mutually reasonable cost.
G:\LEGAL\Planning\Green Crow\GreenCrow part B.#5,wpd
June 24, 2004 (II :48am), June 29, 2004 (10:55) July 9, 2004 (4:30)
July 14,2004 (I :40)
176-
-7-
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT FOR JULY, 2004
CHANGE ORDERS FOR ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
(COSTS SHOWN INCLUDE APPLICABLE TAXES)
-- PROJECT BUDGET ORlGINAL PREVIOUS CHANGE REVISED
TITLE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS CONTRACT
AMOUNT ORDERS THIS AMOUNT
MONTH
Carnegie Library, 97-08 $1,205,953 $957,346.03 $215,461.35 $0.00 $1,172,807.38
Fire Sta. Roof Rep. 02-02 $450,000 $352,785.63 $0.00 $21,044.51 $373,830.14
Elwba UG Rebuild II 02-11 $150,000 $119,108.34 $0.00 $0.00 $119,108.34
Downtown Signals, 03-01 $650,000 $310,368.00 $0.00 $0.00 $310,368.00
Rebuild F St Sub 01-28 $180,000 $106,892.10 $0.00 $7,581.00 $114,473.10
2nd St Water Repl 04-01 $280,000 $176,295.07 $13,511.51 $0.00 $189,806.58
Co-Composting Imp. 04-06 $100,000 $98,661.30 $OtOO $0.00 $98,661.30
I
Peabody St. Overlay 03-15 $400,000 $398,759.50 $0.00 ($8,652.50) $390,107.00
Peabody Waterline 02-20 $2,000,000 $1,271,101.94 $0.00 $0.00 $1,271,101.94
Fairmount Pump Sta 02-26 $850,000 $699,653.33 $0.00 $0.00 $699,653.33
-
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS/PURCHASE ORDERS APPROVED BY CITY MANAGER
(COSTS SHOWN INCLUDE APPLICABLE TAXES)
CONTRACTOR Project- DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
OR VENDOR PO#
UPCOMING PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS
(NEXT 30 DAYS, ESTIMATED DATES SHOWN )
PROJECT ADVERTISE BID START END
TITLE FOR BIDS OPENING CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION
Oak Street Sewer 04-03 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004
Crown Park Sewer & July 4, 2004 August 10, August 2004 December 2004
Storm Imp. 03-12 2004
N :\PWKS\ENGINEER\MGRRPTlChange Orders 2004\co07 -04.wpd
177
Project Description Project Total Cost GrantlLoan Grant Match or A ward Listing Status I
Source & $ Loan Data
CSO/Stormwater Centennial Grant Loan rates and grant matches Varies with Apply
Projects $20,000,000 SRF & PWTF vary with programs. programs when
Loans pgm
firm
Park St. Race to $660,000 ($187,500 TIB PSMP Grant Grant Match: 32%/ $60,000. November 2004 Apply
Liberty Sewer & Sidewalk) $150,000 City $25,000 sidewalk pgm. & August
Sidewalk, TR07-00 $15,000 in kind design/const. 2004
labor; School Dist. $20,000.
16th St. Sidewalk, $200,000 TIB PSMP Grant Grant Match: 25%/$50,000. November 2004 Apply
Phase 1 "F" to "GIH", $150,000 City $15,000 sidewalk pgm. & August
TRI0-00 $15,000 in kind design/const. 2004
labor; School Dist. $20,000.
"
$200,000 TIB PSMP Grant Grant Match: 25%/$50,000. November 2004 Apply
16th St. Sidewalk, $150,000 City $15,000 sidewalk pgm. & August
Phase II "GIH" to "I", $15,000 in kind design/const. 2004
TR09-00 labor; School Dist. $20,000
$165,000 Safe Routes to Grant Match: 33%/$55,000. July 2004 Apply
"F" Street, Stevens to School City $25,000 sidewalk pgm. & May
16th Street (School $10,000 in kind design/const. 2004
District is applicant. labor; School Dist. $20,000.
City to Design &
Manage) /
PUBLIC WORKS GRANT & LOAN APPLICATION STATUS REPORT
JULY 2004
BRAC: Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee
PWTF: Public Works Trust Fund
DWSRF: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
TIB, AlP: Transportation Improvement Board, Arterial Improvement Program
TIB, PSMP: Transportation Improvement Board, Pedestrian Safety and Mobility Program
Centennial: DOE administered grant /loan funding for water quality improvement projects
Safe Routes to School: WSDOT administered grant program for School Route safety improvements
N:\PWKS\ENGINEER\MGRRPTlGrants & Loans 2004\Grants & Loans 7-04.wpd
178
....
Z
:J
0
U
...J
<(
:E
-
z ~
c( -
> c
W -.:t
.... ... 0
w ...., 25
<.. C")
0 en ~
en .c.
W (I) 0)
::l
Z -; 0
E ~
<( .c.
'2 -
:E
::J <C
X C) ~
c
i: 'E -
~
0
0 ~
Z Co)
:J .s
0
u
:E
<(
.J
...J
<(
...J
U
(\I
E
E
::l
en
C
o
:;:;
.!:2
"'C
,~
.... cD 0' <0 \~ '" ." 0 to Ol \~
N - - - N '"
- -
'i I 'a I
Q1
III N '" ::l III N - N ::l
III III
II (I) CII U)
:& ~
c c!
VI III ill
'a I I I III
'a G) Q; "C ~
~ I:: "C G) ...
"C "C 2:! III ..c. G) I:: G)
G) ~ G) (5 ::l 4i <:l ~ <II :; ::l ::l ;-
"C .2! .!! (ij ~ U) "C Q; ~ G) 0 U) "C (I)
Q) I:: Q) G) (ij ~ .!::
.2! (ij <( ::l ::l >- Q; "" ~ I:: !Xl
I:: . C. 1lI :::l :::l I::
;( :::l c. "" I:: .Y- "
fJl fJl fJl <( :::l . I . ~ " ~
G) G) G) ::l 19~ fJl .l!l ~ 0 rn
rn rn '0. 00. 00. ~ ~ I:: S2 1i 1;; G) Q;
0, rn :!2 E
OJ OJ c- o.. 0.. (;j G) :::0 .0 cu :;
0 0 ::l ::l ::l 0 ._ :e :::: III <II ~ .~ 0
0 e Ll. Ll. Ll. e v v :..:: :;;:: S2 v ~ ....i 0 0
~------ ----- ---...--- no
.~'-...-.~_.^.
- -
- r~ I
I
Q;
:;
o
>-<(
.:go
me
:l "C
III cu <(
(,) ~ 0
'ioo
III
III "C
3 ~ :;
~oJl
>-<(
.:go
mO
III _
gr4i<(
o ~ 0
'iOO
III
III "C
CII G)
~j:g
,-,vw
N
C")
>.... e
l!
..
U)
al
rmm
G)
I::
III
E
:::J
:I:
:i2
"
en
III
~
Q
>-
l! :l:
-
U)
m
:::J
0
-
5l
III
()
"C I
III
o~
c:
Qj
t:
:::J
m
.... 0 - I to I
....
e
III
....i
G)
I::
III
E
::l
:I:
:i2
"
en
:l
<D III
N U
>-
l! :i
..
<I)
'i co co
C
~
o
0) - ...
"0
G)
(5
a:
Q)
c:
III
c.~ E
8' :::J
o :I:
~ 1
~ :::J
o m
~I
]
il
U
Q)
rn
III
()
co co 0) - ...
c- o
~
cu
Il:
0
III
(5
a:
Q)
I::
1lI
III E
- ::l
III :I:
0 (,)
... "9- <=
l! ~
~ ::l
0 m
-
I
N - -
Q;
:;
o
>-'" ~
l!
U)
(0 <') III
N N
~ M I co I
!!!
..:
III
::l
G)
rn
1lI
()
- - -
G)
~
c
c:
G)
t:
::l
m
[l~ I~ '''' ~
"C
;-
o
"C
'i co ....
~
o
III III N
.... -
..: , I
III
::l
0
~
0
il
U
Q)
rn
III
()
co .... I() ll'l N
C .... -
5
Q)
Il:
....
'i
III
III
:&
c
...
G)
5 I
>-<(
~o
mO
..
II 'C
= Q) <(
0 ~ 0
'i 0
III
III "C
3 Q)
Gl ~~
0
>-
l!
..
U)
-
-
G)
I::
III
E
::l
:I:
<')
:i2
"
en
..
Gl
0 8
<0
>-
III
.. <l:
U)
....
o
-
....
()
G)
(5
a:
G)
I::
.. III
W E
=:f()
o
'a
GI
~
o
0 I~ l~
~ S
t:- III
:s OJ
(II
::l 0 ~
U) -
C"l
....
N
o
-
"C
~
III
...
;-
m
:::J
0
G)
rn
III
<..)
"C
G)
...
.;;1
.f:
c:
~
:::J
m
-
~
III
'-
-
C"l
\10
....i
'i
c
~
o
-
....
..,
-
..: I
m
:::J
n
~
0
il
<3
..,
rn
III
0
E -
3
..,
N
N
cO
-
.
-
<=
..,
t:
:::J
mil:
o
-
....
III
-
...,.
o
o
N
r-:
o
>-
"'5
...,
:>;
m
"C
rJl
CII
C
-c
Q)
:!:
-c
CII
:5
a:
ti
:>>
D
~
ex:
0
0..
W
~
t-
Z
::J
0
()
..J '<T
~ 0
-
:E 0
c<)
- -
Z to
~ 0
::J
>- I/) ....
e .r:
t- O -
W :;:: '<T
() 'jjj e
0 T""
0 Q. 0
-
rJ) I/) to
W is 0
z ....
0
~ -
:E t
0
::J 0.
0>
J: 0:::
~
Z
::J
0
u
:E
~
..J
..J
~
..J
()
~
!'lI
E
E
'<T 0) :J
e 0 m
....... '<T c:
e T"" .Q
....... "i 1:5
0 T""
'" a; i5
en
I'l:I ci.
- I/)
o .-
t-C
0 0) 0 ..... T'""
N T"" T'""
T'""
T'""
T'"" N
T""
c<) N
I.C) 0) 0 T'"" I.C)
T'"" ...-
'<T c<) (")
'<T N T""
I~ '<T 0'> T"" N
c<)
c<) '<T ...... '<T T""
T'"" T"" I.C) N
N T""
'<T to '<T I.C)
......
N to ..... ......
(") T"" 0'>
N T"" T""
'<T N N (") (")
(")
T""
T"" T"" N
T""
(") ...... T"" ..... (")
N
0'>
N
...... (") '<T
...... N (")
...... T""
N
I.C)
.....
I.C)
....
0>
.r:
6
" c:
~~
~.8
en(/)
UJ-
Em
,,~
.~~
O(/)
T""
c<)
o
T""
(")
T""
I.C)
o
'<T
o
.......
(t)
N
co
I.C)
T""
'<T
c<)
(")
T""
"
o
T""
c<)
T""
I
en"
c: 0>
~ t:
I-~
-a
0>
en
!'lI
Q)
Q)
(t:
<(>.
ae!
000
T""
c<)
T""
'<T
T""
<(-g
ac
o ~
o
.c :=: >.
::;~e!
wmCi5
.r::t::-g
.....!'lIC
:J ..... ~
W(/)O
....1ii
0>0>.r:
C::J-
~ 0- ::J
o~UJ
_:ge
1'l:I_Q)
-0.Q)
00'0
t-'CQ)
<(a::
320
.~ I-
u..(t:
.... E
Q) 0>
:::: Q)
0>"
.r: Q)
(/)0:::
"'C
0> >.
..... !'lI
0.....
0.....
,,(/)
<C
-0"
20>
o.c
o ~
~o
'<T
0'>
'<T
'<T
'<T
CO
T""
......
T""
'<T
T""
......
N
0'>
N
"'C "'C "'C I/)
Gl -
Gl C Gl "'C Gl - ii
"'C "'C 2 1Il .s:: ]I Q) c Q) ...
~ ~ Q) (5 I/) ~~ 1Il .s:: I/) "E Q) E
"'C Iii ~ 01 Q) (5
.s .s "'C ~ - i:ii .c '$;
~ c >. 0 Q) I'l:I -
Q) Iii <f ::;> ::> a. C Gi Iii :0 C c: C: (,) .:.t. <.> 0 <C
:0 c: en a. :0 c: 1= ::;> ::> Q) t.: <.> -
~ ::> UJ UJ ::l en ~ .~ ~
I/) Q) Q) Q) 0- S I/) ~ ::;> UJ UJ ii Q) ~ gJ ii ii
"' '" en "0.. "5- '5- iJ c c c ~ .Q -
.. -- -::. ~ .!!l .il! !! 2 .- .c -S ~ Gl E Q) .- .-
-----.----- .... .- ~ 0 -= () 0
I#)
en
o
C
..- 0 ~ a> N
N
\
\
\ \
..- a> C') ~ \
..-
..-
LO
..-
..- ~ N ~
..- I.''') N
...- ..- I~ C'-l
to
('I')
'iU
-
0
I-
...
Q)
~
0
'iii
'0
I-
~
,s
0
"E
ii3
I,)
""
'"
Q)
E
0
0
~
'- I,)
CI) 0
.s::. 1il
Q)
- >
0 ::J
CI>
~
:2
~
'"
:t:
CI) .0
C .c
I- 0 ~ l'CJ
Q a::
tr:: ell
....... 0
- ('I')
~.: rn
""- 16
D. 8
w <..)
~ <l .... ~
'- c
.... .2 :5 I-
Z "0 ~
:J CIl 0 ~
""-
0 N ..-
'c 0 5
(,) ftl ""-
...J .s::: 8
-
< ::::l
W .... III
:E .2 - '"
ell lIS l:
- Cii t 0 Q)
z ~
< .5 0 ~
0-
s: Q)
oCt c:::
~
::l
"0
4:
rn
Q)
0
0
'iii
"0
I-
...
Q)
.s
0
.....
N
L()
..-
..-
..-
m
rn
Q)
'5-
Q.
::l
0..
O'l
>- ~
... ::l
co ~
E
E
~ (1) :J
0 0 (/)
""- ;.;
r-- c
Q ..- 0
r-- '"=i :g
0 ..-
it'; m ::a
en
'iii CIl Q) 1il , Q)
~ 'iii ::l (ij :c Q) C .~
I,) 0 I,) .l!! ::l Q) ~
u. '6 '03 '6 r:r E
l'CJ IV Q) ~ 181
CI> c Q) ~ a:: ~ Cl
:E :E
0 C Ql ~~
<..) :) ~ E
Q) 'iU
I- -
...
--..~-~_.~_...
182
MINUTES
PLANNING COM.MISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
July 14, 2004
6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Bob Philpott, Fred Norton, Fred Hewins, Linda Nutter,
Chuck Schramm, Leonard Rasmussen, Dylan Honnold
Members Excused:
None
Staff Present:
Brad Collins, Sue Roberds, Jim Mahlum
Public Present:
Steve Zenovic, Darrel Vincent, Ian McElvie, Brian Gawley
APPROV AL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Philpott moved to approve the June 23, 2004, minutes as presented. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Norton and passed 5 - 0 "rith Commissioners Hewins
and Schramm abstaining due to their absences at the meeting.
Chair Hewins indicated that those who testify must sign the "Sign In" log and affirm that
their testimony will be truthful to the best of their knowledge.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES - 2500 Block West
1 oth Street: Consideration of a preliminary subdivision of a 10 acre property in the RS-9
Residential Single Family zone.
Assistant Plmmer Sue Roberds reviewed staffs report recommending approval of the
preliminary subdivision and responded to questions. With the assistance of Director Collins, a
Power Point review was provided of the proposed subdivision and surrounding property
development. Required road improvements were discussed. Chair Hewins opened the public
hearing.
Dan'el Vincent, 711 E. Front Street, Port Angeles, W A supported the proposal but asked
for clarification of the road improvements that would be required for the development.
Director Collins responded that in light ofthe fact that this is the second subdivision that Mr.
Vincent has plmmed for the neighborhood, some amendment ofrequired road requirements for the
earlier subdivision may be made with the approval of the City's Public Works and Utilities
Department that would result in the City's standards being met for streets in the area but in a
different manner than previously required in the earlier subdivision review. The earlier subdivision
was approved with a condition that Milwaukee Drive be improved extending east to the improved
portion of Milwaukee Drive, which happens to be at the entrance to the proposed Mountain View
Estates. Preliminary approval of Mountain View Estates will require that improvements be made
along Milwaukee Drive east a short distance from the property frontage connecting to the improved
183
Plonning Commission Minutes
July 14, 2004
Page 2
portion of Milwaukee Drive. Improvement of West 10lh Street along the property frontage to "N"
Street is also required for the current subdivision.
The Planning Commission then discussed several options with regard to road improvements.
h1 response to Mr. Vincent's request regarding clarification of road improvements that would be
required along West 10lh Street for the Mountain View Estates Subdivision, Mr. Collins noted, !if
the improvement is extended to the intersection of Milwaukee Drive along West 10lh Street, road
improvements for the first subdivision may only need to be extended from the site [of the first
Vincent subdivision] to the intersection, which would then extend to "N" Street rather than east to
the improved portion of Milwaukee Drive as was required for the first Vincent subdivision. The
City's ability to work with the applicant(s) in revising required road improvement requirements to
ensure that, if one of the subdivisions does not become a reality, logical improvements for access
streets in the area to the nearest fully improved street will still need to be completed to serve the
development.
Continued discussion indicated that, although West 10lh Strd,et is improved with a chip seal
surface, it does not meet minimum City standards. As the property owner between the subject
property and "N" Street is the City of Port Angeles, along the north side of the street, it may be
possible for the City to participate now or as a latecomer property owner in any required
improvement to the street required by the Public Works and Utilities Department.
Development of the City's property that is adjacent to the proposed subdivision was
discussed relative to the provision of a park area within the proposed Mountain View Estates
subdivision. Director Collins suggested that if the City were to surplus property in the area, it is
likely that enough property would be retained to provide for a small neighborhood park.
Director Collins responded to Commissioner Nutter that, as a rule, neighborhood parks are
around 2 acres in size and should be situated within a one-half mile radius of the development that
it is intended to serve. Commissioner Nutter commented that park areas are sparse in this area of
the City with the exception of Crown Park and Lincoln Park.
There being no further testimony, Chair Hewins closed the public hearing.
Following extensive discussion regarding parks planning and clarification of
street/access development issues, Commissioner Philpott moved to recommend approval ofthe
preliminary subdivision citing the following conditions, findings, and conclusions:
Conditions:
1. Local access streets shall be constructed per the City's urban service standards, which
includes a 20' asphalt surface with ditches and a minimum 4' all weather surface walkway
separated from the roadway by the ditch prior to approval of the final plat. Signage shall
be placed on all streets developed to low impact development standards indicating that
on-street parking is prohibited along both sides of the streets. 10' radii shall be identified
on Lots 7, 8, 21, 22, and 23, and open space area for turning shall be located at roadway
intersections.
2. Street improvement to the Milwaukee Drive right-of-way along the frontage of the
subdivision shall be placed in accordance with the City's Urban Services and Design
Standards for arterial streetslbicycle routes that includes an 8' all weather surface
walkway and bike route. Street improvements from the intersection of Milwaukee Drive
184
Planning Commission MinuteS
July 14, 2004
Page 3
from the western boundary of the subdivision along West Tenth Street to "N" Street
connecting to the nearest improved street shall be made per the City's Urban Services and
Standards Guidelines that includes a 4' all weather surface walkway with ditches if
developed to the City's low impact development standards. Street trees shall be planted
on the fronting lots along West 10th Street per the City's Urban Services and Guidelines
Policy 3G.1 00 Street Trees and Landscaping.
3. Fire hydrants shall be placed and spaced as required by the City's Fire Department to a
maximum 1000' of separation distance. Wording shall be placed on the final plat and
recorded with the County Auditor upon filing ofthe final subdivision indicating that all
residences shall be fitted with residential sprinkler systems prior to occupancy.
4. Electric utility service to the subdivision shall be underground.
\
5. Prior to final plat approval, an 8 inch water service shall be extended to the lots as
required by the Public Works and Utilities Department.
6. Stormwater plans shall be submitted for approval per the City's Urban Services Standards
and Guidelines and installed prior to final plat approval.
7. Sanitary sewer shall be extended to the new lots as required by the Public Works and
Utilities Department.
8. Building address numbers provided by the City's Building Division shall be placed on the
final plat.
9. The applicant shall place a statement on the plat and make it known to all subsequent
purchasers of the lots that said lots are in the proximity of the William R. Fairchild
International Airport and that the Port of Port Angeles does not warrant that these lots
will always be outside the lowest noise contour currently established for residential use.
10. The applicant shall provide a play area suitable for small children living in or visiting the
proposed residences or shall contribute to the development of the City's undeveloped
park adjacent to the subject site per the approval of the City's Park and Recreation
Director.
Findings:
1. Preliminary approval is for the 33-unit subdivision submitted by Clark Land Office on
June 8, 2004, for Darrel Vincent identified as being Suburban Lot 46 within the Townsite
of Port Angeles and located in the 2300 Block of Milwaukee Drive extending to West
lOth Street. The site is approximately 10 acres in size and is nearly square in
configuration.
185
Planning Commission Minutes
July J 4, 2004
Page 4
2. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Single Family
Residential (RS-9) which allows a density of up to 6 units per acre. The proposed
drawing indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 9,000 square
feet in area.
3. The purpose of the City's RS-9, Residential Single Family zone is a low density
residential zone intended to create and preserve urban single family residential
neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family homes on larger than standard
Townsite-size lots. Uses that are compatible with and functionally related to a single
family residential environment may be located in this zone. Because of land use impacts
associated with nonresidential uses, few nonresidential uses are allowed in this zone and
then only conditionally. This zone provides for a variety in the urban land use pattern for
the City's single family residential neighborhoods, fpllowing a curvilinear street system
of non through public and private streets with irregularly shaped lots, minimum 75-foot
front lot lines, and 60-foot rights-of-way for collector arterial streets in large rectangular
blocks and usually located in outlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable land.
4. The subject property is identified as Low Density Residential (LDR) on the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
5. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency at the time of development for streets,
water service, sanitary sewer service, and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element
Policy A.9) and should require concurrency at the time of development for solid waste
collection, stonnwater management, telecommunications service, and emergency service
(Capital Facilities Element Policy A.l 0). The proposal has been reviewed with respect to
the Comprehensive Plan and the following Comprehensive Plan policies are relevant to
the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A and
Policy A.2; Goal B and Policies Rl, B.2, B.3, BA, and Goal C; Transportation Element
Goal A and Policies A.3, A.6, RIO, B.ll, B.14, and R18; Utilities and Public Services
Element Policy C.2; Capital Facilities Element Goals A and B and Policies B.1, B.3, BA,
B.5, B.6, B.7, and Goal C, Policies C.2, C.3 and CA.
6. Chapter 16.08 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) sets forth local requirements
for the approval of subdivisions. Section l6.08.050(B)(l) P AMC provides that the
Plmming Commission shall examine the proposed plat, along with written
recommendations of City Departments and shall either approve or disapprove the
submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the City Council within a
period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City Department of
Community Development. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the
proposed preliminary plat at a public meeting. Said preliminary approval shall become
void unless a final plat is submitted and approved by the City within the five year period.
7. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the
unifonn division of land within the State. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire
186
Planning Commission Minutes
July 14, 2004
Page 5
into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a
subdivision and detennine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the
public health, safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys and other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes,
parks and recreation, playgrounds, and schools and shall consider all other relevant facts
including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for
students who only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served
by the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can
make written findings that these provisions are made.
8. The Port Angeles Public Works and Utilities, Department of Community Development,
Parks and Recreation, and Fire Departments reviewed the proposed subdivision. Their
comments and specific conditions have been incorporated into the Department's
recommendation. Water, power, garbage pickup, telecommunications, sewer, and
emergency services are available within acceptable standard~ to the site or will be
extended through conditions to the preliminary plat.
9. The subdivision will create three new interior access streets that must be developed to
City standards per the City's Urban Services and Standards Guidelines.
10. The site is currently served by Milwaukee Drive and West Tenth Street. Milwaukee
Drive is improved to one-half width but West Tenth Street is unimproved with a gravel
surface. Milwaukee Drive is an arterial and a designated bicycle route but is not a school
walking route. "N" Street (to the east of the area) is partially designated as a school
walking route. Improvements to Milwaukee Drive will be required such that the final
roadway is an improved width of 24' with a ditch and 8' pedestrianlbicycle path
established on the south side per the City's new suburban low impact development
standards. West Tenth Street from the Milwaukee Drive/Tenth Street intersection east to
the acceptable road improvement on West Tenth Street (toward "N" Street) shall be
developed to the City's Urban Services and Guidelines Standards which will include a 4'
pedestrian path.
11. Using data provided in the Trip Generation Manual. 5th Ed. (Institute of Traffic
Engineers, 1991), a maximum of 320 average daily vehicle trips (ADT) may be generated
at full build out of the subdivision. Based on the 1989 "City and County Design
Standards for the Construction of Urban and Rural Arterials and Collectors", the
appropriate width for a minor collector with an ADT of less than 400 is 20 feet of paved
surfacing. Right-of-way for residential streets will be dedicated within the subdivision to
provide a minimum 20' improved roadway surface with a pedestrian walking path.
Adequate right-of-way exists within the existing 100-foot right-of-way for Milwaukee
Drive to complete a 24-foot asphalt surface with ditching and 8-foot walking/bicycle
path. Approximately 2.16 acres of land will be developed as streets.
12. The City's low impact development standards for suburban areas were adopted in 2003
with the understanding that subdivisions developed under the reduced standards would
not allow for on-street parking. Site development and design for residential lots
developed under the lower impact starib&ls need to accommodate resident parking and
Planning Commission Minutes
July /4. 2004
Page ,6
visitor parking on-site. Roadside ditches developed under low impact development
standards should be kept free of debris.
13. The proposal was reviewed with regard to the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Section
16.08 P AMC) which provides specific design standards which are expected of
subdivisions within the City limits while the City's Urban Services Standards and
Guidelines indicates that street trees should be planted along arterial streets and provides
guidance for such placement and tree species. The design standards identified in Section
16.08.060 F P AMC state that street trees are a protection against excessive heat and glare
and enhance the attractiveness and value of abutting property. The City will assist the
subdivider in location of trees and species to use under varying conditions. It is
recommended that trees be planted inside the property lines where they are less subject to
injury, decrease the chance of motor accidents and enjoy more favorable conditions for
growth. If trees are to be planted within the right-of-way, proposed locations and species
to be used must be submitted for review and approval by the City.
14. There are no environmentally sensitive areas on the site. The site is flat and is not
considered a frequently flooded area nor is it listed on the Federal Emergency
Management Act (FEMA) maps which denote those areas that are within 100-year flood
areas.
15. The owner of a construction site which disturbs a total of five acres or more of land area
that has a discharge of storn1water to a surface water or storm sewer system must apply to
the State Department of Ecology for a General Permit for Stormwater Discharge
Associated with Construction Activities.
16. Building penuits are required for all structures within the subdivision. All local building
and Fire Codes shall be complied with during construction including residential sprinkler
systems.
17. The Port Angeles School District has been notified of the development to allow them to
plan for needed public school facilities and routes. School busses travel along "N" Street.
Hamilton School is the closest school to the site.
18. The City's Parks Department responded that they are aware of the preliminary proposal
and do not believe the level of service for the area will be hampered as a result of the
development. The City's LOS for parks and recreational services is 1/3 acre for 1,000
population. An undeveloped wooded property donated to the City for a park use is
located on property adjacent to the subject site along "N" Street. The nearest public
playground area is located approximately one-half mile east (Crown Park) or east
(Lincoln Park).
19. The site will be serviced by the City's Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments. All
utilities including potable water, sanitary waste, and refuse collection are available in the
area. Transit service is available along "N" Street east of the site.
188
Planning Commission Minutes
July J 4, 2004
Page 7
20. The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance for the preliminary subdivision on July 9, 2004" therefore satisfying the
City's responsibility under the Act.
21. The William R. Fairchild International Airport is located south of the site. Port of Port
Angeles staff has been notified of the proposed subdivision proposal and per agreement
with the Port, it is expected that those who purchase properties in the final subdivision
will be aware of the existing on-going airport operation.
22. The Planning Commission's decision is a recommendation to the City Council. The
Commission acts as the City's hearing body for preliminary subdivision approval.
Reports are advisory only to ensure conformance of the proposed subdivision to the
general purposes ofthe City's Comprehensive Plan and to planning standards and
specifications adopted by the City.
23. Property owners within 300 feet of the proposed subdivision were mailed notice ofthe
proposal and the property was posted on June 16, 2004. Publication appeared in the
Peninsula Daily News on June 22, 2004. No written comments have been received to
date.
Conclusions:
A. As conditioned, the proposed short plat is consistent with the Port Angeles
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
B. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Subdivision Ordinance,
Chapter 16.08 P AMC, and Chapter 58.17 RCW of the Washington State Subdivision Act
C. As conditioned, appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety and
general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that
assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school.
D. As conditioned, signage educating residents and visitors as to the prohibition of on-street
parking will ensure that interior streets remain passable for public safety situations where
on-street parking could prevent ease of passage for emergency vehicles and sight distance
safety issues.
E. The site has served as a drainage area over the years due to its topography. Clearing and
grading activities will require handling of the existing drainage and future stormwater
from the site as a result of development through the subdivision process.
F. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting of this subdivision as
articulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The
189
Planning Commission Minutes
July 14, 2004
Page 8
subdivision provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles
consistent with the State of Washington Growth Management Act.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Rasmussen and passed 7 - O.
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - LUD'VICK. Del Guzzi Drive: Review ofa proposed
11 unit residential subdivision in the RS-9, Residential Single Family zone.
Commissioners Norton and Hewins noted that they are members ofthe Peninsula Golf Club
that is an adjacent property owner to the proposed subdivision property. No one in the audience
objected to their remaining at the dais and acting on the application, and so they remained.
Assistant Planner Sue Roberds reviewed the Department report recommending approval ofthe
preliminary subdivision. With the help of Director Collins, a Power Point presentation provided a
display ofthe proposed subdivision and area development. Chair He~ins opened the public hearing.
Ian McElvie, 2373 East Fifth Street, Port A ngeles, WA spoke in support ofthe preliminary
application and stated that it is the applicant's desire to keep as many ofthe existing trees on the site
as is feasible as the environment is one that is desired to retain.
Steve Zenovic, 519 South Peabody #22, Port Angeles, W A responded to technical questions
as the designer and engineer for the project. He explained that the existing storm water drainage
system in the area discharges to Elmis Creek. The proposal is, rather than creating a a series of
detention ponds that would require a maintenance agreement, to do something more conventional
by providing individual drainage plans for each lot. That way, the individual owners will be
responsible for the systems. While some driveways maybe a bit steeper than normal (10% to 12%),
he didn't believe they would present any real development challenge.
Mr. Zenovic responded to Commissioner Nutter that the typical individual stormwater
systems proposed would be fairly simple and would use a retention method such as buried pipe. The
buried pipe would have an inlet structure on one end with a discharge on the other and a control
structure for discharge. Such systems are pretty much fail safe and should last for many years.
Maintenance is not a big challenge and such systems tend to function better than dry wells that have
no designed outflow.
There being no further questions, Chair Hewins closed the public hearing. Commissioner
Nutter moved to recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision citing the following
conditions, findings, and conclusions in support of the action:
Conditions:
1. Drainage and utility easements shall be shown on the final plat.
2. Stormwater drainage improvements shall be installed or bonded per the City's Urban
Services Standards and Guidelines prior to final plat approval.
3. Residential fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in each residential unit as required by the
Fire Department for all new residential building permits. Notice of this requirement shall
be placed on the final plat and recorded separately with the plat.
190
Planning Commission Minutes
July 14, 2004
Page 9
4. Electrical utilities shall be installed as needed by the applicant or shall be bonded per the
Public Works and Utilities standards prior to final plat approval.
5. Address numbers shall be identified and placed on the final plat as provided by the City.
6. Access easements or boundary line adjustments in favor of Lots 5 and 6 for landlocked
adjacent properties shall be recorded and shown on the final plat.
7. Erosion control measures shall be in place prior to grading and construction.
Findings:
1. The preliminary plat application includes a drawing dated received June 10,2004, prepared
for William and Carol Ludwick by Zenovic and Associates and used as the basis of the
preliminary plat review. The final plat will be entitled Ludfick Subdivision. The City of
Port Angeles acquired the subject property through a foreclosure on unpaid assessments for
Local Improvement District 211 which was sold to the Ludwicks.
2. The preliminary plat subdivides the 5 acres of land into 11 residential lots. The residential
building lots range in size from 9,290 to 21,430 square feet in area.
3. The proposed subdivision site is located along Del Guzzi Drive between Lindberg Road and
U.S. Highway 101 east of Peninsula Golf Course and is legally described as Lot 1 Elmis
Creek Estates.
4. The site is wooded and several ofthe lots have significant topographical features which will
need to be addressed in the site development process.
5. Surrounding properties are developed with low density single family residential uses to the
southeast and one six-plex condominium at the southwest corner of the site, with a private
golf course to the west, and U.S. Highway 101 to the north with commercial uses.
6. The site is currently served by Del Guzzi Drive, which meets City street standards for a local
access street. All 11 lots shown on the June 11 preliminary plat drawing have access from
Del Guzzi Drive. Transit service is available along U.S. 101 north of the site at Del Guzzi
Drive.
7. Drainage from Peninsula Golf Course comes through the site and must be addressed in a
clearing/grading pennit design by a licensed engineer.
8. The proposal has been reviewed with respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The subject
property is identified as Low Density Residential (LDR) on the Port Angeles Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are found to be most
relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Element Goal A; Land Use Element Goal A,
Policy A.2, Goal B, Policies B.l- B.3; Transportation Element Goal A, Policies A.3 and A.6;
191
Planning Commission Minutes
July 14,2004
Page 10
Utilities and Public Services Element Policy D.l; Housing Element Goal A; Conservation
Element Goal A, Policies A.l-A.3, Goal B, Policy BA, and Objective B.4; Capital Facilities
Element Goal A, Policies A.2, A.9-A.lO, Goal B, Policies B.6-B.7, Goal C, and Policies C.3
and CA.
9. The Comprehensive Plan requires concurrency for streets, water service, sanitary sewer
service, and electrical service (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.9).
10. The Comprehensive Plan recommends concurrency for solid waste collection, stormwater
management, telecommunications service, and emergency services (police, fire and
emergency medical response) (Capital Facilities Element Policy A.1 0).
11. The City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element Goal B) states the intention to have a
community where residential development and use of the land are done in a manner that is
compatible with the environment, the characteristics ofthe use and the users, and the desired
urban design of the City.
12. The subject property is identified by the Port Angeles Zoning Map as Single Family
Residential (RS-9) which allows a density of up to 9 units per acre. The proposed drawing
indicates that each lot in the proposed subdivision will be at least 9,000 square feet in size.
13. Del Guzzi Dr. is designated as a local access street and is not designated as a school walking
route. The City's Subdivision Ordinance and Urban Standards and Guidelines require the
development of sidewalks on along arterials or school walking routes.
14. All required utility improvements including potable water, sanitary waste, electrical, and
refuse collection have been provided to the subdivision or are available in the area.
15. The Port Angeles School District currently serves the area, and school capacity is not an
issue with the present trend in declining enrollments.
16. The site is currently served by the City's Police, Fire, and Public Works and Utilities
Departments.
17. Building pennits are required for all structures on any approved building lots. Alllocal
Building and Fire Codes apply to any new construction on the subject property. Residential
sprinklers will be required as the site is outside of the City's four minute response area for
fire response. Best management practices will be observed in the development of the lots
including a clearing/grading plan that includes erosion control measures.
18. Clearing and grading permits are required for any initial site development on sites of one acre
in size or greater.
19. The City's State Enviromnental Policy Act (SEP A) Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance on July 8, 2004, satisfying the City's SEP A responsibility.
192
Plnl1Jling COil/mission Minutes
July J 4. 2004
Page J J
20. Chapter 16.08 ofthe Port Angeles MunicipalCode (P AMC) sets forth local requirements for
the review of subdivisions. Preliminary subdivision applications must contain information
relative to the arrangement and development of streets within and accessing a proposed
development consistent with the City's Urban Services Ordinance and must consider the
relationship to existing roads and topographic conditions, public convenience and safety
issues, and whether the proposed use of the land is adequately served by such roads.
InfoTI11ation regarding lot size and the relationship between depth to width in lot area
development, vision triangles, building setback and building envelope areas, utility
easements and improvements to those utility services that are needed to service a proposed
development, street lighting, and public spaces.
21. The Revised Code of Washington RCW 58.17 contains the State's guidelines for the uniform
division ofland within the State of Washington. Section 58.17.110 requires a city to inquire
into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision.
It shall determine if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public h~alth,
safety, and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts including
sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who
only walk to and from school and whether the public interest will be served by the
subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the city can make written
findings that these provisions are made.
22. Section 16.08.050(B)(1) P AMC provides that the Planning Commission shall examine the
proposed plat, along with written recommendations ofthe City Departments, and shall either
approve or disapprove the submittal. A recommendation thereon shall be forwarded to the
City Council within a period of 90 days after a preliminary plat has been submitted to the
City Planning Department. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the proposed
preliminary plat at a public meeting.
23. The preliminary plat was reviewed by the City's Fire, Public Works and Utilities, Parks and
Recreation, and Community Development Departments. Those comments have been taken
into consideration in the recommended conditions of preliminary approval.
24. Public notice ofthe subdivision application was published in the Peninsula Daily News on
June 18,2004, and posted on the site and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the
proposed subdivision on June 16,2004. No written comment was received as a result ofthe
notification.
Conclusions:
A. The conditions ofthe Ludwick Subdivision are required by the City's Subdivision Ordinance
and are necessary to implement the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies for residential
development
193
Planning Commission Minutes
July 14, 2004
Page 12
B. Stonn drainage, electrical, and telecommunications improvements are the only street and
utility requirements which have not been installed per the City's Urban Services Standards
and Guidelines but will required as a condition of preliminary approval.
C. Due to wooded nature of the subject property, street trees are not needed.
D. The large lots proposed are necessary due to the topographical and other accesslbuilding
constraints of the property.
E. The RS-9 zone allows for an overall residential density much higher than is proposed. The
subject site is not located in an area with a grid street system and should be developed with
low density housing units and curvilinear streets to achieve the desired urban design of the
City.
1
F. As conditioned, the preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Code.
G. As conditioned, the preliminary plat is in conformance with the Port Angeles Subdivision
Ordinance, Chapter 16.08 P AMC, and the Washington State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17
RCW.
H. As conditioned, review has been done and appropriate provisions have been made for the
public health, safety and general welfare and for drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other
public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation and
other planning features.
1. As conditioned, the public interest is served in the platting ofthis subdivision as articulated
in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision, and Zoning Ordinances. The subdivision
provides for development of new homes within the City of Port Angeles consistent with the
Growth Management Act and beneficial to the City's tax base.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Schramm and passed unanimously.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None
STAFF REPORTS
It was agreed that the August 11, 2004, regular meeting would be cancelled.
194
Planning Commission Minutes
July 14, 2004
Page 13
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
None
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
Brad Collins, Secretary
PREPARED BY: S. Roberds
Fred Hewins, Chair
195
196
DATE:
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FOR TANGE LES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
July 28, 2004
MA YOR AND CITY COUNCIL
MIKE QUINN, CITY MANAGER
Dan McKeen, Fire Chief 0
The fire in the Elks Lodge was reported at 3:51 AM on December 9,2003. Fire crews were on the
scene well into the afternoon of the 9th and the full investigation into the cause and origin of the fire
was not completed unti I late on the 15th of December. From the 15th on, work on the reconstruction
of the building has been ongoing. Remarkably, only seven months after the fire, one of the tenants
had already re-opened a cafe in the building!
Elks Naval Lodge Fire Update
Our intent with this update is to provide a very brief overview of the Elks Lodge fire, the impacts
of the fire, and the reconstruction progress to date.
The fire started in a back office area of the Camera Corner. Although we can point to the exact area
where the fire started, the exact cause of the fire is a bit more difficult to determine. We know what
equipment was in the area of origin and most likely, the fire started in a multiple outlet plug strip that
was located at the point of origin.
197
Unfortunately, the City does not have
the financial resources to fund an
extensive engineering study to
examine all of the equipment that
was within the area of fire origin in
order to determine the exact cause.
Because of this, and the fact that the
fire is not suspicious, we will not go
any further with a cause
determination.
City Council
Page 2
July 28, 2004
Although the fire itself was a major event, it is only the beginning of the story. A fire like this has
far-reaching consequences. It is similar to a small pebble that is tossed into a still pond- small
ripples form that expand as they move outward, eventually covering the entire surface. Think about
the Elks fire for a minute:
. On the momtng ot the fire, traffic was rerouted throughout town. How many
commuters we.re affected? How many businesses were affected?
. We had at least 30 volunteer firefighters on scene for many hours. We appreciate
their sacrifice and dedication - there was surely an impact upon on their personal
employment. How many were late for work or missed work that day?
. After the fire, traffic and parking downtown was problematic at best. How many
small businesses were affected?
. Power and water were shut off for many hours. Businesses adjacent to the Elks
building were affected. Independent Bible Church offices were closed for days.
. A small retail store to the north, "Stuff for Home and Garden," closed and will not
be reopening. This is the loss of a business downtown and loss of employment.
. The Internet@Play Cafe was damaged and has only just reopened. The loss to the
owner has been extensive.
. The Bead Shop was unable to
open for many days. The
Travel Agency to the west
was affected by lack of
power and impacted parking.
. The Camera Corner was
devastated. Many employees
have been out of work.
Many memories were lost.
Wedding pictures, vacation
pictures, pictures of
newborns and loved ones, all
of which can never be replaced. Literally hundreds of our neighbors were affected by
the loss of this one business.
198
City Council
Page 3
July 28, 2004
What about the Elks Lodge? The Elks had to cancel many events at the busiest time of the year.
Think of all the planning and preparation by various groups that was done-that had to be redone.
How many folks from around the country had made travel arrangements to be here for events that
were cancelled or postponed? Again, hundreds. perhaps thousands of people, our neighbors and
friends, were impacted by the closure of the Elks building. This is not even considering the loss of
historic items in the Elks building itself.
Finally, although it would be difficult to quantify, what exactly is the impression that is left behind
when a visitor to our City sees the largest building in the downtown with fire scorched walls and
boarded-up windows?
There are probably many other
stories - stories of loss and
inconvenience caused by this
fire.
Unfortunately, these stories
aren't the ones that make the
newspaper, and many of us
simply move on without giving it
much thought.
It is important to think about the
enormous consequences that this
fire has had. Hopefully it has
raised our awareness and it will
help as we work to find ways to
prevent such an event from
happening again.
Thankfully, the Elks have worked hard to build in as many fire protection features that they can with
the reconstruction of their building. When it fully reopens, the Elks building will be completely
protected by an enhanced fire alarm system and by a new fire sprinkler system. Also, an additional
exit is being provided from the upper floors of the building. In combination, the addition of these
features will result in a building that is considerably safer and far more useful for the Elks and the
community.
199
City Council
Page 4
July 28, 2004
In the past, the lack of a sprinkler system and an adequate exiting system has precluded the Elks from
full utilization of the building. Upper floors, once used for apartments, could not be safely used.
With the addition of the sprinkler system and enhanced fire alarm system, these floors will be able
to be utilized much more fully.
runmng.
In the long run, in addition to the
poten.tial for increased useable
space, the Elks will likely reap an
fnsurance benefit from the
upgrades they have made to the
building. In short, although the
fire was devastating, the final
results should be positive.
The Camera Corner is getting
ready to move back in within a
month or so. That means
employees will be back to work
and locals will have one of their
favorite shops back up and
The overall success of the Elks Lodge ..revival" is really a result of a considerable amount of
extremely hard work on the part of hundreds of members of the community. When completed, the
building will once again be a focal point of a vibrant downtown area.
200