HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 08/04/1998
.
AGEN
. PORT ANGELES (
321 EAST FIFTH STREET, POR1
August 4, 1998 - REGULAk IVl.r..r.lll"'u -
Becky Upton
City Clerk
.) ::.1U p.m.
CALL TO ORDER - Regular Meeting (5:30 p.m.)
II ROLL CALL
III PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -
IV CEREMONIAL MA TTERS/PROCLAMATIONS
V WORK SESSION
A Financial Report for period ending June 30, 1998 1
VI APPROVAL OF MINUTES of July 21, 1998 regular 17
meeting
None
Action
VII LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON THIS OR FUTURE AGENDAS (By Council, Staff or Public) AND
PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA (This is the opportunity for members of the public to
speak to the City Council about anything not on the agenda, please keep comments to 5-10 minutes.)
VIII FINANCE:
A Award bid for equipment garage lift 31 Action
. B. Final payment & acceptance of Ediz Hook/USCG 33 Action
Sewer Project
IX CONSENT AGENDA:
A Payroll- July 26, 1998 - $382,566.60 37 Action
B. Check list - July 31, 1998 - $794,986.73 39 Action
X CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
XI ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS
A. REZONE APPLICATION - REZ 98-03 - 51 Action
NORTHWEST PERMIT, Ninth Street between
Lincoln and Laurel Street: Request to rezone ,-
property designated RS-7 [Residential Single
Family] to CSD [Community Shopping District). Action
B. STREET VACATION PETITION - STV 98-01
NORTHWEST PERMIT - request to vacate a 135
portion of the 8th/9th Street alley between Lincoln
and Laurel Streets.
C. Acceptance of Jefferson County Waste at Landfill 177 Action
[Ordinance & Interlocal Agreement]
XII RESOLUTIONS NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC
HEARINGS
A. Approving Aetna for Deferred Compensation 183 Action
Program Action
B. Supporting Department of Ecology for Coordination 187
. of Site Clean-up at Rayonier
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
. MA VOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
August 4, 1998 Port Angeles City Council Meeting
Page - 1
,~
XIII PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
A. Planning Commission Meetings of July 8, and
special meeting of July 28, 1998
XIV OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
A. Amendment to PUD Wholesale Water Contract
B. Interlocal Agreement with Transit and Downtown
Association for Port Angeles International Gateway
Transportation Center
C. Amendment to Industrial Water Supply Contract
D. Watershed Resource Inventory Area 18 City
Representative appointments
E. Authorization to sign contact for Phase IV of Port
Angeles Housing Rehabilitation Project
XV PUBLIC HEARING-QUASI-JUDICIAL (7:00 P.M. or
soon thereafter)
XVI PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER
A. STREET VACATION PETITION - STV 98~2
Olympic Memorial Hospital: A portion of the
alley between Georgiana and Caroline directly west
of Chambers [continued from July 21, 1998
meeting]
B. STREET VACATION PETITION - STV 98~3
HERMANN - a petition to vacate a portion of the
SecondlThird Street alley in Block 49, Townsite of
Port Angeles.
189
209
213 Action
217 Action
223 Action
227 Action I
Action
229 Action
None
231
Action
239
Action
.
XVII EXECUTIVE SESSION (As needed and determined by City Attorney)
XVIII ADJOURNMENT Action
IX INFORMATION:
A. Humane Society Report, January - July 1998 (Page 268)
B. Electronic Home Monitoring and Alternate Incarceration - Update (Page 270)
C. Clallam County Physicians Community Benefit Fund (Page 272)
D. Memo from City Manager (Page 276)
. .-
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings are set by the City Council in order to meet legal requirements pertaining to matters such as, land use permit applications, proposed
amendments to City land use regulations, zoning changes, annexations. In addition, the City Council may set a public hearing in order to receive public input
prior to making decisions which impact the citizens. Certain matters may be controversial, and the City Council may choose to seek public opinion through
the public hearing process.
C:\98-0804.WPD
.
NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE
MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK
August 4. 1998 Port Angeles City Council Meeting
Page - 2
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
I.
CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING:
II. ROLL CALL:
Members Present:
Mayor Braun
Councilman Campbell
Councilman Doyle
Councilman Hulett
Councilmember McKeown
Councilman Wiggins
Councilman Williams
Staff Present:
Manager Ibarra
Attorney Knutson
Clerk Upton
J
~
$
=Z=
B. Becker
S. Brodhun
B. Collins
K. Godbey
S.I1k
J. Pittis
AU2:ust 4. 1998
6$-
f''-M. (
III. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION:
Reason:
Approximate Length:
IV. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION:
V. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Led by: ~~-2fh..L ha.u A~,
~do~~~
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
)
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Attendance Roster
DATE OF MEETING: AU!!Ust 4.1998
LOCATION: City Council Chambers
%srl
:JG3
~ c.. "3
fB;; 6' :5
City of Port Angeles
OrdinancelResolution Distribution List
CIty Council Moellng of a.~L4:f:- "', 1CJ.t!L
.~~:~: ~~~QR
:... ....
Chy Manager /
City Atty. (1) J ./ J vj
J./
~ V':
1/
Planning
City Clerk
Deputy Clerk
Personnel
Cust. Svcs.
Finance Dir./Mgr.
Police Dept.
Fire Dept.
Light Dept.
Pub. Works (2)
Parks & Rec.
MRSC (1)
PDN (Summary)
Extra Copies
AD /I 'VtJ. u J )
~n'J;i R_
TOTAL
~--A J//J..gg ql)", 1'7. Qfl
F r.:.+.- ~. ~rr:::: ~
<.t '" 'l" l . 01 DtJ I'JL. -
~r'\. - Kn ~~~,6J ,
, 'l
/
I ./ I .;
J../ /
~ ./
/-/
/'
,/
,:;J V
J .~
J/
~v
1/
,./
f), .oJ-
~
Jv'
/
P.. -~ 'M l Y
~V
,Q t/
~~..1
/'
J v
/
JV
,/
IV
LV'
~l IVI M I
:~: 0 (J
}v'
JV
,./
/ I
C/
"7
q
1--
.
Finance'
Department
Memorandum
Kay Godbey, C.PA
Director
. Tanya O'Neill
. Infonnation Services
Administrator
Yvonne Ziomkowski
Accounting Manager
Carol Hagar
Administrative Assistant
.
July 31, 1998
To: ' Manager Ibarra, Mayor Braun and Councilmembers
From: Kay Godbey, Finance Director
Yvonne Ziomkowski, Account4tg Manager/City Treasurer
Re: Mid- Year Budget Status Report
Background:
Weare pleased to provide the budget status report. and treasurers report for
the six months ended June.30, 1998. T~~<budget status report shows activity
from January 1 through June 30, 1998'as compared to the adopted budget.
Variances reflect uncollected revenues and unexpended appropriations ,as a
percentage of the budget. The benchmark for analytical purposes should be
50%, assuming all financial transactions occur at the. same level each month.
This report reflects the City's financilil..... performance as compared to its
budgetary estimates. Although the City's revenue and expenditures are "on
target" with respect to financial planning, this report does not present reve-
nues and expenditures, as compared to pri?r years. We are still experiencing
a significant decr~asein certain tax revenues. In 1997 ,for example, the
General Fund was adversely affected by.$680,000,rlue to declines in sales
and electric utilityre,venue,and new costs in support of the prosecution and
incarceration progtaffi. The General Fund's finances continue to be stable
and we are closely monitoring our revenue stream.
- General Fund'
.._"'~
The General Fund budget is. on target with 54% of revenues collected, and
49% of appropriations, expended
General Fund revenue by major revenue source is depicted in Table 1. Tax
revenue comprises 60% of the General Fund budget and include property
taxes, sales and use taxes, utility taxes, and other t~es. Fifty-fiy~ percent of
the tax revenue has been'collected as of June 30. Sales tax revenue is being
monitored very 'closely as it is a taX. source that is directly impacted byeco-
nomic conditions. Although year:-to-date actual sales tax revenue is 14%
higher than 1997 levels, we anticipate a slowdown in construction activity.
July sales tax receipts, for example, are 11 % less than July 1997. The fluc-
001
---:-- -~
tuation in sales tax activity is directly attributed to the completion of several major construction
projects. Schedule A depicts actual sales tax revenue over the last five years.
.
Fines and Forfeitures revenue will come in over budget. Finance conservatively estimated this
revenue source based on less than one year of history with the new prosecution and incarceration
program. Building permit revenue is also coming in ahead of budget, with 65% of budgeted
revenue collected as of June 30. There is a slight seasonal impact on this revenue source, as
building permit.revenue is down in the month of July. Miscellaneous revenue contains donations
and grants that were unanticipated in the budget process.
General Fund expendi- Table II
tures are right on target, General Fund Expenditures by Department
with 51 % of the budget left
to spend. Table II depicts
General Fund expenditures
by department. Although
the 50% benchmark deter-
mines whether departments
are staying within their
budget, there i.s occasionally
a one-time expense or sea-
sonal expenses that may.. alter the analysis. As an example, the City Manager and City Council
cost centers reflect 35.6% left to spend, however, this is the result of un budgeted payout and re-
cruitm~nt expenditures for the City Manager position. The Public Works Engineering and Ad-
ministration Division indicates 56% left to spend. This is largely due to a transition in bringing
facility maintenance duties in-house. County jail costs, which are reflected in the police budget,
are also within budget.
city Manager and City Council
Finance
City Attorney
Planning
Police
Fire
Public Wor1<s
Parks and ReCreation
Am!!!
438,694
587,229
. 196,702
115,054
1,402,522
916,037
817,677
784,123
IlYSIsW
!)8O,705
1,187,933
384,112
225,853
2,847,802
1,903,588
1,858;056
1,667,438
Variance
242,011
600,704
187,410
110,799
1,445,280
987,551
1,040,379
883,315
6,268,038 10,766,487 6,497,449
2
.
~.
35.6%
50.6%
48.8%
49.1%
50.8%
51.9%
56.0%
53.0%
61.1%
.
002
.
.
:':t~i"'~~j.?~:;.'/-~.;,'~\:'
h,: ,!.."~',\""
.,' /?\i'.'~-','>';:
I
;~
~ii.,\~
'!~,,~rrf~'"
;~1:;~~~r;E~;:' ,
:~",">:_:.;'. "
.o::,r:v,:';~:~W
, -, ,;-','J~~;~_;tf?~t.;~i~Y-'{:
,"',
Table m reflects Gen- Table III >
eral Fund expenditures General Fund Expenditures by Object
by object or type of
expense. Salaries and
benefits represents
,74% of the budget and
is 51 % unexpended.
Capital outlay spending
occurs sporadically, Total Expenditures by Object
and is difficult to
measure against the 50% benchmark.
Actual Budaet Variance %
3,866,268 7,932,337 4,066,069 51.3%
1n,832 327,927 150,095 45.8%
806,915 1,609,002 802,087 49.8%
344,979 707,521 362,542 51.2%
62,044 178,700 116,656 ,65.3%
5,258,038 10,755,487 5,497,449 51~1%
Salaries and Benefits
Supplies
Other Charges for Services
Intergovernmentalnnterfund Services
Capital Outlay
Other Funds
Hotel/Motel (Schedule B)
The June 1998 hotel/motel receipts doubled as the result of invoking an additional"'2% lodging
tax. Approximately 76% of this revenue is received in the last six months of the year. The City
will be on budget.
Criminal Justice (Schedule C)
The one-tenth of one percent sales tax is distributed based on county-wide sales tax and popula-
tion. The year-to-date revenues are 13% more than 1997 and will be slightly over budget. Over
60% of this tax is received in the last six months of the year.
Real Estate Excise Tax (Schedule D)
Year-to-date sales are 32% less than last year, as a result of the 1997 sale of the ~ed Lion to
Doubletree Inns. The tax on this transaction'amounted to $21,000. Without this receipt, the real
estate excise taxes reflect a 7% increase over 1997Jevels.
Utilities
Light Fund
Light operating revenues include charges for service, conservation revenue, interest income, and
other miscellaneous revenue. Light revenue is 5% ahea.d of budget, due to the seasonal effect of
electric sales. On the expense side, the power bill (reflected in supplies) shows 7% overexpended.
Both electric sales and electric power purchases level out toward year-end. Capital outlay reflects
over $800,000 in capital projects that are largely ,!nexpended as ,of mid-year. Utilities have a
. flexible budget, and are analyzed to insure that revenues are adequate enough to pay expenses and
3
003
fund smaller capital projects. Any excess revenue over expenses will be transferred to a rate stabi-
lization fund, so that rates may remain constant over the next three to five years.
T able IV
Light Fund
Revenue and Expenses
Actual Budaet Variance %
Revenue: 8,826,188 16,125,137 7,298,949 45.3%
Expenses:
Salaries and Benefits 430,890 885,058 454,168 51.3%
Supplies 5,320,506 9,246,100 3,925,594 42.5%
Other Charges for Services 1,270,489 2,284,415 1,013,926 44.4%
Intergovernmentalllnterfund Services 579,707 1,077,040 497,333 46.2%
Capital Outlay 13,251 829,525 816,274 98.4%
Debt Service 209,456 418,910 209,454 50.0%
T atal Expenses 7,824,299 14,741,048 6,916,749 46.9%
Water and Wastewater Fund
Water and wastewater
revenues include charges
for service, permits, in-
terest earnings and other
miscellaneous . revenue.
Revenue:
There is a seasonal im-
pact on water sales,
which is reflected in the
year-to-date revenue
being slightly below
budget. In addition, a
recent increase in water
rates will bring revenues Total EXDenses
in line with the budget.
Although the water and wastewater budget shows only 20% left to spend, operating expenses are
within targeted levels. Capital outlay, although over budget, reflects a timing difference on the
downdown watermain and Ediz Hook sewer projects. These projects were budgeted in 1997.
The debt service payment on the water and wastewater bond is due on November 1.
-!
.
.
T able V
W;lter and Wastewater Fund
Revenue and Expenses
Actual
2,711,832
Variance
2,828,375
Budaet
5,540,207
Expenses:
Salaries and Benefits
Supplies ....
Other Charges for Services
Intergovemmental/lnterfund Services
Capital Outlay-
Debt Service
523,822
86,492
822,082
188,049
1,954,255
741,401
1,039,946
288,050
1,983,940
410,920
424,731
1,259,104
516,124
201,558
1,161,858
222,871
-1,529,524
517,703
4,316,101
1,090,590
20.2%
5,406,691
The water and wastewater fund has adequate reserves to fund 1998 capital projects. Like the
electric utility, a rate stabilization fund has been established to keep wastewater rate increases
from fluctuating too rapidly.
4
004
%
51.1%
49.6%
,70.0%
58.6%
54.2%
-360.1%
41.1%
.
.
Solid Waste Fund
Solid Waste revenue consists .of residential and commercial sales, landfill sales, grants, interest
earnings and miscellaneous revenue. Solid Waste revenue will be over budget, as there is a sea-
sonal effect on landfill tonnage during the summer months. The utility is also experiencing addi-
tional revenue from the Rayonier dem9lition debris. Other operating expenses are well within
projections. The overall expenses indicate 54% left to spend. This is due to the the 1993 bond
payment, which was made on January 1. Capital outlay reflects appropriations for the landfill cell
expansion which are unexpended.
Table VI
Solid Waste Fund
Revenue and Expenses
Actual Budaet Variance %
Revenue: 2,494,161 4,576,500 2,082,339 45.5%
Expenses:
Salaries and Benefits 322,804 571,196 248,392 43.5%
Supplies 30,391 101,900 71,509 70.2%
. Other Charges for Services 715,450 1,812,524 1,097,074 60.5%
Intergovemmental/lnterfund Services 239,264 462,000 222,736 48.2%
Capital Outlay 205,208 1,235,745 1,030,537 83.4%
Debt Service 763,625 763,625 0 0.0%
Total Expenses 2,276,742 4,946,990 2,670,248 54.0%
.
5
005
.
Schedule A
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
TOTAL
BUDGET 1998
.
.
. CD
o
o
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
SALES TAX COLLECTION
FOR THE YEARS 1992 -1998
G %OF %OF % OF BUDGETED
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 CHANGE CUM. CHANGE AMOUNT
1998 TO 1997 1998 TO 1997 COLLECTED
180,019 175,814 192,686 182,705 155,868 171,053 9.74% 9.74 8.55%
208,399 233,936 199,344 203,257 189,874 209,075 10.11 % 9.95 10.45%
166,564 177,143 175,903 213,429 183,425 212,048 15.61% 11.91 10.60%
157,539 151,160 165,620 158,872 133,492 170,548 27.76% 15.10 8.53%
200,723 186,406 177,285 171,548 166,101 194,575 17.14% 15.51 9.73%
196,056 187,410 179,575 193,869 164,244 187,818 . .14.35% 15.32 9.39%
181,418 180,001 192,318 175,785 177,591
192,906 189,488 192,705 181,297 182,129
212,895 211,983 247,166 212,314 214,701
231,885 215,076 219,078 203,549 225,998
224,661 187,072 224,064 207,704 199,053
192,504 171,788 228,989 179,551 194,605
2.345 569 2.267.277 2.394.733 2.283.881 2.187081 1. 145 117 -49.86% (49.86 57.26%
I 2,000.0001
Change 1993 to 1992
Change 1994 to 1993
Change 1995 to 1994
Change 1996 to 1995
Change 1997 to 1996
,-2.60%
-3.34%
5.62%
-4.63%
-4.24%
Schedule B
~
o
o
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
HOTEUMOTEL TAX COLLECTION
FOR THE YEARS 1992 -1998
B %OF %OF % OF BUDGETED
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 CHANGE CUM. CHANGE AMOUNT
1998 TO 1997 1998 TO 1997 COLLECTED
10,'115 7,517 5,746 6,936 5,992 6,237 4.09% 4.09 3.67
4,665 5,237 4,213 5,813 4,909 5,48!~ 11.65% 7.49 3.22
6,809 5,137 5,467 5,297 7,090 6,507 -8.22% 1.30 3.83
5,374 5,738 6,146 6,690 13,047 6,413 -50.85% (20.62 3.77
6,280 7,232 4,962 7,653 7,249 7,858 8.40% (15.13, 4.62
12,584 8,883 8,872 7,353 8,909 9,176 3.00% (11.70 5.40
. ,
13,257 13,571 14,965 12,090 15,096
18,142 13,795 23,158 19,902 19,821
15,029 31,505 29,955 32,021 30,050
40,535 33,600 33,008 33,141 35,407
20,030 13,100 23,689 23,003 21,924
. 12,298 19,953 13,328 12,708 9,945
165 118 165 268 173.509 172.607 179 439 41.672 -75.86% (75.86' 24.51
I 170,0001
JANUARY
".FEBRUARY
ARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULy....
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
TOTAL
BUDGET 1998
Note: April 1997 ~hows $8,000 in additional revenue from a state audit
.
.
.'
.
.
.
00
<::)
o
Schedule C
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
CRIMINAL JUSTICE SALES TAX COLLECTION
FOR THE YEARS 1992 -1998
TOTAL
BUDGET 1998
G %OF %OF % OF BUDGETED
1994* 1995 1996 1997 CHANGE CUM. CHANGE AMOUNT
1998 TO 1997 1998 TO 1997 COLLECTED
11,769 11 ,332 9,963 11,981' 20.25% 20.25% 7.99%
12,318 12,930 15;211 14~429 -5.14% 4.91% 9.62%
11,541 13,459 11,983 15,063 25.70% '11.61% 10.04%
10,765 10,052 9,945 10,794 8.54% 10.97% 7.20%
11 ,828 11 ,873 10,772 13,571 . '25.98% 13.76% 9.05%
12,253 13,102 12,409 13,592 9.53% 13.01% 9.06%
10,856 12,934 11,424 11,665
12,500 12,702 12,907 13,345
13,791 15,855 14,704 15,317
13,631 14,191 14,091 15,441
12,196 13,880 13,986 13,861
11 ,921 15,403 13,102 15,081
74 895 155.439 152.962 154 993 79 430 -48.07% -48.07% 52.95%
I 150,0001
JANUARY
'.t ,.'.
FEBRUARY"
MARCH
.' APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
· Implemented in May 1994; first receipts - July 1994 (for May sales)
I ___
JANUARY...
FEBRUARY
MARCH",
...APRIL
;t':"0~~"PfA Y
~"'2~'fjU N E
"
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
TOTAL
BUDGET 1998
.
1994
6,610
9,261
7;783
8,182
8,161
8,212
7,830
7,153
7,997
5,254
7,657
7,700
en
o
o
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX COLLECTION
FOR THE YEARS 1994 -1998
1995
. 1996
1997
~ %OF %OF %OFBUDGETED
~ 19~~~~~:97 ~~:~ ~~~~:7E C~~L~~~~D
I..' ..
11 ,520
4,818
9,732
8,716
7,759
9,499
8,779
13,226
9,075
15,785
13370
5,594
5,~?2
4,~76
4,800
8,594
6,401
8,484
7,255
10,926
6,918
9,620
13,794
6,251
9,492
7,686
9,960
6,189
3,458
5,392
26,538
5,948
5,467
7,229
5,534
6,217
5,687
9,220
7,518 .
11 ,099/i > . .....
4,220 ....>
6,513 ............
91 800 117.873
.." ... - -. ".".
. ,.. .,. -. -. .
.., .... ___". d'
O. ..._ .__.
.., -. .. -"
.. .,.... .... n."'
.." .... ... "...
..... ,.. ...,_. '.
.."," .......... ......
..".,..........'.....,..'.',-.,..."...'....
..", ...- "......... ....
96.941 101 190.<38.477
79,9191 75,0001
.
-78.06%
-26.43%
-12.20%
18.88%
15.&7%
36.47%'
(78.06
(68.61 \
(60.48
(47.78
(40.86
(32.42
7.76
5.83
6.40
11.46
8.53
11.31
51.30
.'
...,-..
010
.
.
.
.
Finance
Department
Memorandum
Kay Godbey, C.PA
Director
. Tanya O'Neill
Infonnation Services
Administrator
YVOIUle Ziomkowski
Accounting Manager
. Carol Hagar
Administrative Assistant
.
July 28, 1998
To: Manager Ibarra, Mayor Braun, and Council Members
From: Yvonne Ziomkowski, Accounting ~ager ~
tfO' ,
Re: Investment Review .
City's Investment Portfolio
All of the City's available cash is consolidated into a common investment portfolio which
averages about $30 million. The City's portfolio is maintained at a high degree of safety
and liquidity, and generates a yield between 6.0% and 6.2%. In comparison, the State
Investment Pool had returns between 5.3% and 5.5%; 3-month treasury bills between
5.0% and 5.2%; and 2-:year treasury"notes5.8% to 5.4%. All investments comply with
the State and the City investment policies.
For safety of prinCipal, investments are restricted to certificates of deposit (CD),
bankers' acceptances (BA), treasury notes and bonds, securities of the agencies of the
United States Government, and municipal bonds. All City investments (other than cash
equivalents) are rated AAA by both Moody's and Standard & Poor (S & P). The
portfolio is well diversified in its investment types and all securities will return full face
value when held to maturity.
.
Certificates of deposit are covered under the FDIC or FSLIC insurance. They
are purchased from the institutions whose status' has been 'accepted by the Public
Deposit Protection Commission.
" .
· Bankers' Acceptances are limited to the top 25 national banks or from foreign
banks to the top 106 world banks. They are 100% secured by both goods and
bank.
· Treasury bills and notes are issued by the Treasury Department. They are
guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.
.
Agency securities are issued by the agencies ~f the federal government. Yields
on these securities are generally higher than those of the direct Treasury
obligations. These are the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), Federal Farm
Credit Bank (FFCB), Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), and
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC). There has been no case
of default in the almost. 70 year history of these instruments.
011
.
About 55% of the portfolio is presently invested in agencies of the U. S. Government. Over 12% of
the portfolio is invested in the Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP); however, the amount of
deposits with the LGIP change on a daily basis. LGIP, with great liquidity, safety, and comparatively
high yield, continues to be an excellent place to invest short-term funds. The LGIP return is
consistently higher than ~-month treasury bills.
Almost 30% of the portfolio is invested in cash equivalents (BAs and CDS). This percentage, higher
than in prior years, is due to very preferable rates. All CDS are invested with local state banks.
The City does not purchase investments which, at the time of investment, cannot be held to maturity.
In order to protect cash flow and avoid premature liquidation, the City diversifies maturity of the
investments. At this time, almost 17% of the investment portfolio matures in less than 30 days, 23%
have maturity dates ofless than one year, 31 % have maturity dates between one and two years, and
more than 29% of the portfolio have maturity dates greater than two years.
Over the past few years, we have changed our investing strategy several times according to the
market and interest changes. We will continue to monitor the changes and trends in the economy and
. take the necessary steps to maintain safety, liquidity, and a high rate of return on the City's
investments.
Where are We Going?
.
The U.S. economy continues to amaze experts as it begins its eighth year of economic expansion-
already one of the longest expansions on record. Last year the u.S. economy grew 3.8% - the fastest
pace in nine years. l-Iowever, inflation has remained subdued, rising only 1.7%; the lowest level in
eleven years.
The 30-year bond hit its lowest level since the 1960's and is below the 6% level (5.6%). While this
may seem low compared to recent interest rate levels over the past two decades, it is actually high
by historical standards. Over the past 80 years, the'average rate of long term Government bonds is
5.4%, and if you exclude the last twenty years, the average is just 4.2%.
The yield curve remains flat, as short and long term yields are less than 60 basis points apart. A flat
yield curve in a bull market is unusual. The general trend continues to be toward lower interest rates.
In any case, as long as inflation remains low, the rates (mostly intermediate and long-term) are not
likely to change much from current levels.
.
012
. CITY OF PORT ANGELES~NVESTMENT LEDGER . .
07/31/98
BALANCE INTEREST!
INVESTMENT/ ACCOUNT 54ottl...... MATURITY FACE OF INVESTMENT COUPON
FUND SAFE KEEPER NUMBER TYPE DATE DATE PRICE VALUE RATE YIELD
SOLID WASTE
FIRST FEDERAL. CLEVENGER 102000504 CD 08/06197 0Ml6I98 .2,935.92 .2,935.92 10.000%
CEMETERYEN~MENT
FIRST SAVINGS BANK OF RENTON 5122.90 CD 0:W+'98 02/14/2000 .6,033.65 .6.033.65 5.850% 6.110%
FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN 0112002... CD 05120/97 11/19/98 9,793.01 10,462.10 5.580% 5.690%
$55,826.66 556,495.75
FIREMEN'S PENSION
WINTHROP GROWTH-DEVEGH MIF 0022923080 MF 12131169 20,702.70 20,702.70 VARIES
PRNATE LEDGER 641"()1901~90 FHLMC 02125/85 25,772.52 25,772.52 8.000%
AMERICAN INVESTORS 001-00806 1 17-a MF 12131/69 19,118.45 19,118..5 VARIES
$65,593.67 $65,593.67
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
US BeAl. "0%" CD for HMee charges CD 2/18/96 N/A (1) 100,000.00 100,000.00 6.250% 6.250%
o GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL 01770 IP 3,559,258.56 3,559,258.56 50479%
FIRST SAVINGS BANK OF RENTON 515276-00 CD O:w4l97 05I22J2000 100.??oo 525,453.65 541,200.67 5.800% 6.060%.
FIRST SAVING BANK OF RENTON 709133-02 CD 06117/98 06118/99 100.??oo 292,2.5.34 301,031.55 5.800% 6.060%
FIRST SAVINGS BANK- RENTON 01 51.22309 CD 06118/98 06114/2000 100.??oo 577,387.64 59.,7.8.65 5.800% 6.060%
FIRST SAVINGS BANK- RENTON 01 51.222 00 CD 07116198 07/18/99 100.??oo 579,007.02 596,394.43 5.900% 6.160%
US BeAl Cruftenden Roth CUSIP31364AB50 FNMA 0016197 07fZ8/98 98.8125 300,000.00 298,403.81 5.270% 6.239%
US BeAl . US BeAl BA 02106I98 07/28/98 97.3388 .35,000.00 .23,.23.68 5.570% 5.802%
US BaAl . OI.rlcen-Wllems, Inc. CUSIP31364AC75 FNMA 02106197 06126198 (52) 99.9375 200,000.00 199,082.66 5.160% 5.904%
US BeAl . Oulean-Wllems, Inc. CUSIP31364A041 FNMA OMl6/97 09108198 (.2) 99.2188 500,000.00 .98,386.97 5.550% 6.0.2%
FIRST SAVINGS BANK OF RENTON 51.824-03 CD 09110/97 09110/98 100.??oo 540.202.65 556.605.95 5.950% 6.220%
US BeAl - Amherst Secu1Ues CUSIP31359MDAa FNMA 07/15/98 10/28/98 (IOS} 100.2188 500,000.00 508,205.56 6.650% 5.760%
FIRST SAVINGS BANK - RENTON 0151.22.07 CD 11/15196 11/13198 100.??oo 575,104.63 592..18.58 5.900% 6.160%
FIRST SAVINGS BANK OF RENTON 0151.3500 I CD 12102197 12102198 566,303.35 583,352.34 5.900% 6.160%
FIRST SAVINGS BANK OF RENTON 51..28-05 CD OMl9198 01m199 561,764.12 578,602.63 5.950% 6.220%
FIRST SAVINGS BANK OF RENTON 01.515548-06 CD 07fZ8/97 01/12/99 100.??oo 513,1.3.01 528,724.4. 5.950% 6.220%
US BeAl - Cruftenden Roth CUSIP313364AN32 FNMA 0111:)3197 02109199 (.2) 99.0938 500,000.00 .97.608.51 5.750% 6.213%
FIRST SAVING BANK OF RENTON 709134-00 CD 01 A:l8I98 0015199 100.??oo 581.291.n 598.925.00 5.950% 6.220%
FIRST SAVING BANK OF RENTON 515834-05 CD 01/26/98 05120I99 100.??oo 500,000.00 . 512.947.08 5.900% 6.160%
FIRST SAVINGS BANK OF RENTON 01-51554~ CO 07fZ8/97 06108I99 100.??oo 513,1.3.01 528.72.... 5.950% 6.220%
WA Crectt Urlon 609639-3..() qo 07129/97 07129199 100.??oo 100,000.00 100.000.00 6.800% 8.800%
US BeAl - Cruftenden Roth CUSIP31364FBM2 FNllA 10114197 09123/99 (72) 99.9688 500.000.00 .99.861.19 5.980% &.995%
US BeAl . Oulcen Wllems CUSIP3133M3K79 FHL8 04121/98 lOA:l1199 (99) 99.9063 300.000.00 3OO.6n.08 &.750% 5.802%
US BeAl . Oulcen WII..... CUSfP86387RF64 SLMA . 04A:l 1 /98 12/18/99 (95) 100.1953 500,000.00 500.976.56 6.010% 5.880%
FIRST SAVING BANK OF RENTON 709014-05 CO' 0:w3198 01/14/2000 100.??oo 597,609.54 609,376.32 5.650% 6.110%
US BeAl . CruIIenden Roth CUSIP3133M3J08 FHLB 02127/98 0212612000 (88) 99.9375 500,000.00 .99,887.50 5.681% 5.71.%
US BaAl - OIR:8n-W1lems CUSIP313400SP9 FHLMC 02106I98 0311512000 (86) 100.??oo 270.000.00 276,212.81 &.87&% 5.875%
US BeAl . Cruftenden Roth CUSIP31364FWF. FNMA '0411:)1/98 03129120OO (94) 99.8750 500.000.00 .99,774.31 &.750% 5.820%
FIRST SAVINGS BANK OF RENTON 51.557-09 CO 02/13198 0014/2000 100.??oo 555,943..7 5n,550.95 5.950% 6.220%
US BeAl - Oulean-W1lems CUSIP3133M34H5 FHLB Qo4/27/98 002012OOO (100) 99.9688 500.000.00 500,.13.96 5.865% 5.880%
US BeAl Oulean-WIIems CUSIP31364FU82 FNMA 07/15198 06130I2OOO (107) 99.98<< 500,000.00 501,1 19.60 5.750% 5.7&7%
US BaAl Cruftenden Roth CUSIP3133M.UU5 FHLB 07/16198 0711.12000 (108) 100.??oo 500,000.00 500,160.97 5.795% 5.795%
US BaAl Cruftenden Roth CUSIP3133M.X65 FHL8 07120198 0712012OOO (109) 99.8906 500.000.00 .99,.53.13 5.700% 5.759%
. US BaAl US BerltCorp CUSIP649667N32 MB 03113198 08A:l112OOO 100.7560 500.000.00 509,689.03 6.350% : 6.000%
US BeAl Cruftt!nden Roth CUSIP3134A1ZC7 FHLMC 12/18/97 0911:)112000 (811 100.2500 500.000.00 501,234.62 6..'0% 6.025%
US BaAl Oulean-W1lems CUSfP31364BLL2 FNMA 0:w3198 09/2612000 (90) 100.0023 350.000.00 350,820.31 6.360% 6.257%
US BeAl Cruftenden Rolh CUSIP3133M<lJH7 FHLB 06194198 1210020OO (1051 99.9688 500,000.00 .99.M3.75 6.000% 6.01.%
US BaAl - 0I.rlcen-W11..... CUSIP313395APO FHLB 03120198 12/1612000 (93) 100.2969 500,000.00 501,484.38 6.230% 6.106%
US BeAl . Crultenden Rolh CUSIP 3133M2S00 FHLB 12129/97 1212912000 (M) 99.9M. 500,000.00 .99,922.10 6.190% 6.196%
US BeAl . IIInng Sper1cs CUSIP3133M.A29 FHLB 05A:l4I98 05A:l4I2001 (1011 99.9375 500,000.00 .99,687.50 6.010% 6.033%
US BeAl . EcMerd Jones CUSIP3133M4MZ3O FHLB 06115/98 06A:l6I2001 (105) 100.??oo 300,000.00 300,346.50 5.940% 5.940%
US BeAl . Crultenden Roth CUSIP3133MOVP3 FHLB 0411:)2198 06106I2OO1 (96) 100.2109 500,000.00 506,1.9.13 6.550% 6..60%
US BeAl - Shey FlrencI8I SeMees CUSIP31359MATO FNMA 03119/98 10tW/2001 (92) 100.5781 500.000.00 502,890.63 6.900% 6.713%
US BaAl . Crultenden Rolh CUSIP31359MATO FNMA 04A:l2l98 llm/2001 (96) 100.5313 500,000.00 502,656.25 6.900% 6.730%
US BeAl - Crultenden Roth CUSIP313364CPL6 FNMA 0111:)3197 1110512OO1 (.,) 99.9375 505.000.00 504,7.9.03 6.820% 6.832%
US BeAl . Amherst Secu11les CUSIP31364COR2 FNMA 05A:l7/98 11/19/2001 (102) 100.3125 500.000.00 501,562.50 6.570% 6.460%
US BaAl - OIR:8n-WIIems CUSIP3133MOVOO FHLB 05114/98 07125/2002 (103) 100..219 500,000.00 512.169.17 6.645% 6.525%
US BeAl - OIR:8n-WIIems CUSIP3134A1W48 FHLMC 02/11/98 1210912OO2 100..219 375.000.00 376,582.03 6.570% 6.030%
US BeAl - Crultenden Roth CUSIP3133M2G50 FHLB 01/23/98 0112312003 (86) 100.0022 500.000.00 500,000.00 6.260% 6.260%
US BaAl - PAINE WEBBER CUSIP31364AN40 FNMA 01/26/96 0210312OO4 (18) 99.3750 500.000.00 .97,627.86 6.260% 6.923%
C> US BaAl . MUlIlerlc Secu1tes CUSIP31359MCWl FNMA 11/26/97 0911812007 (79) 101.0938 1,000,000.00 1,010.826.08 7.110% 6.944%
1-4 US BaAl - MAllON SECURITIES CORP. CUSIP3129125A2 FHLMC 06117/93 11/15/2007 (2) 98.5000 155.969.88 152.890.70 8.540% 9.327%
DONALDSON LUFKRIN & JENNERETTE CUSIP3134.XZB6 FHLMC 06125185 O4A:ll/2017 7.,562.68 7..562.68 10.650%
W US BaAl . MARCUS, STOWELL. & BEVE CUSIP31358UGl.. FNMA 10/26/93 0312512023 (7) 102.1250 250,000.00 250,000.00 6.750% 6.&03%
527,753,390.67 $28.01..204.74
527 917 7.6 92 528 179230.08
Investment Types
as of July 27,. 1998
Bankers Acceptance
$423,424 -
1.500/0
.
Local Govemment
Investment Pool
$3,559,259
12.630/0
Certificate of Deposit
- $7,995,235
28.370/0
Other
$549,510
1.950/0 .
. Agency-type Securities
- $15,651,803
55.540/0
Certificate of Deposit
Bankers Acceptance
Local Government Investment Pool
Agency~type Securities
v UJ.cf
AMOUNT
$7,995,235
423,424
3,559,259
15,651,803
~1 9 ~, '"'
v-t ",-,.LV
$28.179.230
0/0
28.37
1.50
12.6~
55.54
, o~ .
100~O~
01.4
.
.
.
Investment Maturities
as of July 27, 1998
30 days to 6 months
~ $3,856,959
13.690/0
6 months to 1 year
$2,734,599 -
9.700/0
\
( .
Less than 30 days
$4,688,698
16.640/0 //
,/
I
/1
. i
i
,~,
----------~'. -------//
_________-----/- Over 2 years
$8,544,771
30.320/0
1 year to 2 years
--. $8,354,203
29.650/0
Less than 30 days
30 days to 6 months
6 months to 1 year
1 year to 2 years
Over 2 years
AMOUNT
$4,688,698
3,856,959
2,734,599
8,354,203
8.544.771
$28.179.230
0/0
16.64
13.69
9.70
29.65
30.32
100.00
015
.
Treasury Yield Curve
6.6
i
I
I
6.411
6.4
% YIELD
6.2
6
5.8
5.6
5.4
5.2
5
3 months 6 months i 1 year 2 years ~. 3 years i 5 years 10 years 30 years
;:]
[jj
As of 7/27/98
As of 7/27/97
.
016
.
CALL TO ORDER-
REGULAR MEETING:
ROLL CALL:
CITY COUNCIL MEE'f.ING
Port Angeles, Washington
July 21, 1998
Mayor BraWl called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles City COWlcil to order at 5 :35
p.m.
Members Present:
Mayor BraWl, COWlcilmembers Campbell, Doyle, McKeown,
Wiggins, and Williams.
Members Abse11l:
COWlcilman Hulett.
Staff Present:
Interim Manager Pittis, Attorney Knutson, Clerk Upton, B.
Becker, B. Collins, S. Ilk, P. Rose, L. Haehnlen, P. Burrett,
Y. Ziomkowski, B. Titus, G. Kenworthy, T. Smith, and S.
Kenyon.
Public Present:
L. Lee, N. VanSickle, G. Gleason, K. Bailey, J. Ralston, S.
Grainger, D. Hart, T. Schmid, M. Pearson, D. May, M.
Jacobs, S. Grainger, M. Jacobs, L. Olson, S. Baxter, and A.
Frederick.
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Patrick Ibarra.
Mayor BraWl introduced and welcomed Patrick Ibarra, the new City Manager.
Mayor BraWl adjourned the meeting to Executive Session at 5:40 p.m. to discuss a matter
of real estate for approximately 1 5 minutes.
The meeting returned to open session at 6:00 p.m.
Mayor BraWl read aloud"8 Resolution recognizing the efforts of Interim Manager Jack
Pittis.
None.
Councilman Doyle moved to approve theminutes of the regular meeting of July 7,
1998. Councilman Wiggins seconded the motion, which carried by a majority vote,
with Councilmember McKeown abstaining due to her absence from that meeting.
Interim Manager Pittis stated there were two items to add to the agenda: one was an item
of real estate, and the second was with regard to a July 27, 1998, Utility Advisory
Committee meeting and the status report of the Electrical Strategic Plan. Interim Manager
- I -
017
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 21, 1998
LATE ITEMS TO BE
PLACED ON TIllS OR
FUTURE AGENDAS:
(Cont'd)
FINANCE:
Fire Engine Bids
Bids for Landfill Expansion
High School Sidewalk
Project
Airport Road Realignment
Project
Pittis suggested the meeting could serve as a special Council meeting which would
eliminate the need for the consultant to make two trips to report on the Electrical Strategic .
Plan.
A.
Advertise for Fire Engine Bids
Mayor Braun reviewed the infoimation provided by the Fire Department. Chief Becker
stated Pete Burrett and Pat Rose; members of the Apparatus Committee, and Yvonne
Ziomkowski from the Finance Department, were present to answer any questions the
. Council may have. Councilman Doyle, 'who participated on the Apparatus ~ommittee,
summarized why a new truck is needed and how it will be funded. Councilman Doyle
asked if the old truck could be utilized in the future if annexation should occur and a spare
truck was needed. Chief Becker responded there may be liability issues, and it would be
his recommendation that consideration not be given to retention of the truck. He noted that
the truck wouldn't even be marketable to another municipality.
Councilman Doyle stated he hoped that a program can be instituted so that, in the future,
this money would not have to come from the General Fund. Interim Manager Pittis stated
that the. City may qualifY for a low interest State loan for this purchase. Yvonne
Ziomkowski, City Treasurer, explained the loan program through the State Treasurer may
prove to be beneficial in light of the favorable interest rate, which is currently at 4 1/2%.
Chief Becker responded to questions and provided clarification. At Council's request, Pete
Burrett, Equipment Superintendent, explained why it will cost less to order a fire truck this
year instead of waiting until 1999. Lengthy discussion followed, and Chief Becker
provided an explanation as to changes in technology and regulations, which make a new
fire engine essential. Councilmember McKeown moved to authorize Equipment .
Services to advertise for bids for a new fire engine. Councilman CampbeU seconded
the motion, which carried unanimously.
B.
Award Bids for Landfill Cell #3 Expansion
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Departmen~ and
asked Interim Manager Pittis for further input, which he provided. Interim Manager Pittis
was pleased to have Delhur awarded the bid, as the company provides quality work and is
a local contractor. Councilman CampbeU moved to accept the bid from Delhur
Industries in the amount ofSl,711,207.84 and authorize the Mayor to execute the
construction contract. Councilman Wiggins seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously. .-
c.
Final Accepuince and Paymentfor High School Sidewalk Project
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department. Interim
Manager Pittis noted this project was complete and was made possible by State TIB
funding in the amount of $200,000.
Councilman Wiggins moved to accept the project, authorize final payment to
Lakeside Industries in the amount of $23,655.85 and release the retainage bond
upon the receipt of clearances from the Department of Revenue and Labor &
Industries. Councilman Williams seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Interim Manager Pittis announced that the City had received a grant from TIB for sidewalks
on "r' Street.
Amendment to Contract with HIA, [nc.for Airport Road Realignment Project .
D.
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department and
asked City Engineer Kenworthy for further input, which he provided.
- 2 -
D1S
.
.
.
Airport Road Realignment
Project (Cont'd)
CONSENT AGENDA:
COMMI'ITEE
REPORTS:
Senior Discount Income
Level Adjustment
Ordinance No. 2994
Construction Codes and
Fees
Ordinance No. 2995
-rt'i::';';>'\;-?~\;',;
,.;::,;')<-<;:-r"(t:-; '",
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 21,1998
Mr: Kenworthy responded to questions and provided clarification, after which
Councllmember McKeown mo~~ to,authorize the Mayor to sign the Supplemental
Agreement (Amendment No. 2) in the added amount of 522,027.21 to the current
agreement with Harding LawlOn Auociations Infrastructure, Ine. which increases
the total not to exceed fee of the agreement to 5222,237.30. Councilman Doyle
seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Councilman Doyle moved to accept the Consent Agenda including: A. Acceptance
of grant for school resource officer, B. Payroll- July 12, 1998 ~ $361 ,887.17; and C. Check
list - July 17, 1998 - $582,833.85. Councilman Campbell seconded the motion.
Following brief discussion, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Councilnuin Doyle stated he attended the ribbon cutting of the new teen scene which will
be called "The Alley". It is a very nice facility and a great place for kids.
Mayor Braun noted that Doyle McGinley, CollectionlPre- Treatment Coordinator at the
Wastewater Treatment Plant; had earned a Certificate of Competency for the Water District
Manager #2. At Mayor Braun's request, Interim Manager Pittis explained what this
entailed. The City Council has sent a letter of congratulations to Mr. McGinley.
Councilman Doyle announced that the YMCA would be holding a grand opening for its
cardiovascular unit at 1:00 p.m., Wednesday, July 22, 1998.
Ordinances Not Requiring Public Hearings
A. Senior Discount Income Level Adjustments
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Finance Department and asked
Scott Kenyon, Customer Service Representative, to summarize the proposed ordinance.
Mayor Braun then read the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 2994
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
revising income limitations for the low income utility
discount for senior citizens and amending Ordinance
2663 and Chapter 13.20 of the Port Angeles Municipal
Code.
-.....
Councilman Wiggins moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. Councilman
Campbell s_econded the motion, which carried unanimously.
B. Adoption of New Construction Codes and Fees
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department and
asked Lou Haehnlen, Sr. Building Inspector, for a summary of any changes in the codes.
Mr. Haehnlen noted that, at this time, no fee increases are recommended. After discussions
with the. Homebuilders Association, it was agreed that the level of fees will be revisited
during the budget process. Mayor Braun read the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 2995
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington,
adopting the 1997 editions of the Uniform Building,
Mechanical, Fire, Plumbing and Sign Codes, the
Washington State Energy Code, and the Uniform Code
for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings and amending
- 3 -
019
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 21, 1998
Construction Codes and
Fees
Ordinance No. 2995
(Cont'd)
Alteration of Subdivision
Acceptance of Solid Waste
from Jefferson County
PUD Wholesale Water
Contract .
Agreement with Transit and
Downtown Association for
Gateway Project
Industrial Water Supply
Contract
PUBLIC HEARINGS
QUASI-JUDICIAL:
Rezone - Olympic Memorial
Hospital
Ordinance No. 2996
Ordinance 2552 as amended and Chapters 14.03 and 14.21
of the Port Angeles Municipal Code.
.
Councilmember McKeown moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title.
Councilman Wiggins seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Resolutions Not Requiring a Public Hearing: None.
Planning Commission Minutes: None.
Other Considerations
A.
Alteration of Subdivision - SHP 78(2)8
Mayor Braun reviewed the infotmation provided by the Planning Department, and Planning
Director Collins provided additional input. Councilman CampbeU moved to authorize
the Mayor to sign the Mylar allowing amendment to the 1978 short plat, citing
Findings 1-6, and Conclusions A-C as setforth in Exhibit "A" which is attached to
and becomes a part or these minutes. Councilmember McKeown seconded the
motion, which carried unanimously.
B.
Consideration of Acceptance of Solid Waste from Jefferson County.
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Public Works Department and
asked Interim Manager Pittis for additional input. Interim Manager Pittis indicated that
Jefferson County was quite anxious to obtain a decision from the City. Revenue generated
by this endeavor would assist Port Angeles with post-closure costs. Councilman Doyle .
stated that he understood the Jefferson County Commissioners would be contacting the City
Council members regarding this issue; however, he has had no such contact. Local haulers
pay $63 per ton; therefore, Councilman Doyle felt a 50% reduction, or $31.50 per ton,
would be an appropriate rate. Discussion followed, after which Councilman Doyle
. moved to offer to accept the waste from Jefferson County at a rate of $31.50 per ton.
Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
C. Amendmell/ 10 PUD Wholesale WalerCOlI/raCI
Deferred to next Council meeting.
D.
Inter/ocal Agreement with Transit and Downtown Association for Port Angeles
Intemational9ateway Transportation Center
Deferred to- next Council meeting.
E.
Amendment to Industrial Water Supply Contract
Deferred to next Council meeting.
A. REZONE APPliCATION - REZ 98-04 - OLYMPIC MEMORIAL HOSPITAL,
between Georgiana and Caroline adjacent to Chambers Street. Request to
rezone property designated CO. Commercial Office, to PBP, Public Buildings
and Parks.
Councilman Doyle announced that he and his wife own property in this block; however, he
did not feel the rezone affected him. He offered to step down from discussion should there
be any objection. No objections were voiced, and Councilman Doyle remained with the
Council.
.
-4-
020
.
.
.
PUBLIC HEARINGS -
OTHER:
Street Vacation - Olympic
. Memorial Hospital
CITY COUNCll.MEETING
July 21,1998
Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the Planning Department. Director
Collins offered several minor corrections to the information contained in the packet,
including a new Page 108 which had been distributed prior to the meeting.
Mayor Braun opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m.
Bill Lindberg, Lindberg Architects, 319 S. Peabody Street, represented Olympic Memorial
Hospital. Mr. Lindberg described the project, explained why the rezone was requested, and
responded to a question posed by the Council.
There being no further public testimony, Mayor Braun closed the public hearing at 7:07 (
p.m. and read the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO. 2996
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles rezoning
property located in Hart and Cookes Subdivision of
Suburban Block 31 of the Townsite of Port Angeles
from Commercial Office to Public Buildings and Parks
and amending Ordinance 280 I, as amended.
Councilman Wiggins moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title, citing Findings
1 - 10 and Conclusions A - C, as set forth in Exhibit "B", which is attached to and
becomes a part of these minutes. Councilman Williams seconded the motion.
Following brief discussion, a vote was taken on the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Mayor Braun stated the next item would be the hearing on the Olympic Memorial Street
vacation.
A.
STREEl' VACATION PEl'ITION - srv 98-02 OLYMPIC MEMORIAL
HOSPITAL: A portion of the alley between Georgiana and Caroline directly
west of Chambers.
Councilman Doyle again offered to step down from the issue, however, there were no
objections to his participation. Mayor Braun reviewed the information provided by the
Planning Department and asked Director Collins for further input. Director Collins noted
several corrections which were necessary, and referred to a corrected page of the
Ordinance which had been distributed to Council prior to the meeting. Director Collins
offered additional cl~cation on the issue and responded to questions.
Mayor Braun opened the public hearing at 7 :20 p.m.
Bill Lindberg, Lindberg Architects, 319 S. Peabody Street, represented Olympic Memorial
Hospital. Mr. Lindberg offered clarification to Condition #3 of the Ordinance. He
informed the Council that the alley is actually be relocated rather than vacated. This will
allow residences to the west to have access. to their property from the alley. The relocation
of the alley will improve parking and patient flow into the facility.
Using the overhead projector, Director Collins provided additional clarification regarding
the location of the alley, the parking facilities, and ingress and egress as noted in Condition
#3.
There being no further public testimony, Mayor Braun closed the public hearing at 7:30
p.m. and read the Ordinance by title, entitled
- 5-
021
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 21,1998
PUBUC HEARINGS -
OTHER:
(Cont'd)
Street Vacation - Olympic
Memorial Hospital
(Cont'd)
Break
PUBLIC HEARINGS .'
QUASI JUDICIAL:
(Cont'd) .
Rezone - Northwest Permit
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles vacating
a portion o~ the alley between Georgiana and Caroline
Streets in Hart and Cookes Subdivision of Suburban
Blocks 31 of the Townsite of Port Angeles.
.
Councilmember McKeown moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title, citing
Findings 1 -9, and Conclusions A - D as set forth in Exhibit "C" which is attached
to and becomes a part of these minutes.. Councilman Campbell seconded the motion.
Following brief discussion, Attorney Knutson rioted the compensation amount was blank
in the ordinance. Apparently this matter had not been referred to the Real Estate
Conunittee to detennine that amount. Councilman Doyle stated a Real Estate Committee
meeting is scheduled for Monday, July 27, 1998, and this was an agenda item. Attorney
Knutson said the Ordinance cannot be adopted until the compensation amount has been
detennined; however, the Council can vote on approval of the street vacation.
The previous motion was withdrawn, and Councilman Wiggins moved to approve
the street vacation citing Findings 1 -9 and Conclusions A - D, as set forth in Exhibit
"C", which is attached to and becomes a part of these minutes. Councilman
Williams seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Director Collins expressed concern over the closing of the public hearing, as it precludes
discussion of the compensation amOWlt. Councilman Doyle moved to reopen the public
hearing. Councilmember McKeown seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
Mayor Braun and Councilman Williams excused themselves from the public hearings for .
Northwest Permit due to appearance of fairness and conflict of interest.
Mayor Braun declared a recess at 7:32 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 7:40 p.m. Mayor
Braun and Councilman Williams had departed the meeting.
B.
REZONE APPUCATION - REZ 98-03 - NORTHWEST PERMIT. Ninth Street
between Lincoln and Laurel Street: Request to rezone property designated RS-
7. Residential Single Family. to CSD. Community Shopping District.
Deputy Mayor Doyle reviewed the information provided by the Planning Department and
asked Director Collins for-additional input. Director Collins reviewed revisions made to
the proposed Findings & Conclusions which, he noted, did not change the conclusions of
the Planning Conunission. Rather. they removed references to the specific project, except
in Conclusion F. Deputy Mayor Doyle reopened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. .
Scott Grainger, 600 University, Seattle, Washington, spoke on behalf of the applicant,
Northwest Pennit, and the owner, The Baldridge Group. Mr. Grainger stated that the
applicant's Traffic Engineer and Architect were also present to answer any questions staff
or Council might have.
Theresa Schmid, 114 E. 9th Street, spoke in opposition to the rezone. Seventy-seven
residents signed a petition against this rezone, and she urged the Council to listen to what
the people are saying. Ms. Schmid expressed fear that the rezone would cause increased
noise and traffic levels and perhaps invite voyeurism on 9th Street. Commercial growth
should not be encouraged away from downtown, when commercial property is readily
available for stores of this size. Ms. Schmid also felt the rezone would make this
neighborhood a less desirable place to live.
.
Councilman Campbell asked Ms. Schmid about her 9th Street traffic concerns, and she
-6-
022
.
.
.
PUBLIC HEARINGS -
QUASI JUDICIAL:
(Cont'd)
Rezone - Northwest Permit
(Cont'd)
CITY COUNCll.MEETING
July 21, 1998
replied by reading aloud from a statement she had prepared regarding possible future 9th
Street traffic.
Nancy VanSickle, 819 S. Laurel Street, spoke in opposition to the rezone. Ms. VanSickle
agreed with Ms. Schmid. She informed the Council that there is an espresso stand on the
comer of 9th and Lincoln Streets. Watching the morning traffic, Ms. VanSickle noted
traffic would leave 8th Street, drive down Laurel to 9th Street (speeding) to reach the
espresso stand. A child was almost hit by a car that was driving up to that stand.
Commercial traffic has already increased due to Albertson's relocation to Lauridsen Blvd.
Another commercial enterprise would make a bad matter worse.
Ms. VanSickle also feared that the project would creat~ another. teenage hangout, such as
is located at the AM/PM gas station. Businesses that remain open 24-hours seem to
become the newest hangout. Ms. VanSickle also felt that parking would be decreased for
the existing businesses in this area which would result in employees parking on 9th Street.
Marsha Pearson, 118 E. 9th Street, spoke in opposition to the rezone. Ms. Pearson also
was concerned about traffic and safety issues and echoed the comments of Ms. Schmid and
Ms. VanSickle. Ms. Pearson did not feel this rezone was advantageous to the City as it
would not increase economic activity, but would result in the displacement of existing
businesses. Ms. Pearson stated that Mr. Grainger, Rite Aid's representative, gave sworn
testimony at the Planning Commission public hearing, that if this rezone were denied, Rite
Aid would not leave the area, but would remodel at its current location. Ms. Pearson urged
the Council to deny this rezone.
Discussion followed, and Ms. Pearson responded to questions and provided clarification
regarding parking and traffic flow.
Kathleen Bailey, 817 S. Laurel Street, did not oppose the rezone; however, she did agree
that traffic was a problem on 9th Street and in the 8/9 alley. Ms. Bailey stated she grew up
in this neighborhood and the commercial businesses have always been good neighbors.
She felt Rite Aid was being blamed for a traffic problem that they did not create.
Nancy VanSickle, 819 S. Laurel Street, agreed that the existing businesses have been good
neighbors. Ms. VanSickle was not opposed to Rite Aid, but rather to a 24-hour type of
business.
Theresa Schmid, 114 E. 9th Street, stated that the Planning Commission vote was three to
two on this issue, not four to two. The Planning Commission was divided on the issue
based on traffic.
Scott Grainger, 600 University, Seattle, Washington, thought Ms. Schmid was referring to
the vote on:the alley vacation and not the rezone. He stated that this was not going to be
a 24-hour store.
Marsha Pearson, 118 E. 9th Street, stated the increase in traffic at any hour of any given
day was the main concern regardless of how long the store was open. She asked the
Council to take into consideration an already over loaded street and not increase the
problem by approving this rezone. A traffic study has proven an increase of29 cars per
hour turning onto 9th Street. Ms. Pearson was glad to learn it was not going to be a 24-
hour business, but she maintained her opposition.
Councilman Campbell asked Mr. Grainger if it were true that the existing store would be
remodeled if the rezone was denied. Mr. Grainger stated he did not recall his exact words
at the hearing; however, this would be an option.. Other options would be closing the store
or looking for an alternative site. The final decision would rest with Rite Aid. Councilman
Campbell asked why this site was chosen by Rite Aid, and Mr. Grainger described the
basic criteria.
- 7 -
023
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 21,1998
PUBLIC HEARINGS-
QUASI JUDICIAL:
(Cont'd)
Rezone - Northwest Permit
(Cont'd)
CoUncilman Campbell asked how many parking spots were proposed and Mr. Grainger
deferred to Mr. David May, the architect for this project.
.
David May, Mulvaney Partnership, 112 Fifth Ave. N., Seattle, Washington, stated 69
parking stalls are required and would be provided.
Director Collins stated Mr. Grainger's testimony from the Planning Commission meeting
could be found on Page 136 of the packet Councilman Campbell asked for an explanation
of the different traffic ratings. Director Collins deferred to the applicant's traffic engineer.
Marldacobs, traffic engineer, 2101 112th Ave. NE, Bellewe, Washington, explained the
traffic analysis and ratings system.
There was no further testimony, therefore, Deputy Mayor Doyle closed the public hearing
at 8:40 p.m. and read the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles rezoning
property located in Block 268 of the Townsite of
Port Angeles from Residential Single Family to
Community Shopping District and amending
Ordinance No. 280 I, as amended.
Discussion ensued. Councilmember McKeown spoke in opposition to the rezone. She felt
it would be an invasion of a residential district, and the traffic would be threatening to the
safety of the children. Councilmember McKeown felt allowing this rezone would
compromise the quality of life in exchange for sales tax revenue. Councilman Wiggins .
agreed with Councilmember McKeown and felt the rezone would be an imposition on the
neighbors and, therefore, he would be voting against it.
Councilman Campbell stated he had walked around that neighborhood and sympathized
with the residents; however, this neighborhood is already substantially commercial.
Several businesses will be replaced, and the traffic from those businesses should be
subtracted from that created by Rite Aid. This rezone is in. compliance with 'the
Comprehensive Plan. or can be made to be in compliance. The City needs to be concerned
with economic development. When invesunent is discouraged, the potential for the tax
base is decreased and forces the cost of city services and infrastructure improvements back
onto the citizens. The traffic problem on Lincoln Street is difficult; however, if the increase
in traffic is the criteria fOl:.economic development, the City will have to shut its doors and
no further invesunent will be possible. Councilman Campbell stated he was concerned
about turning down 1his rezone and the opportunity to this new invesunent.
Deputy Mayor Doyle agreed with Councilman Campbell. He also sympathized with the
neighborhood. However, denying this rezone would not improve the existing traffic
problem. Eventually this area will be developed. A future project may be less desirable
than the current one. Councilmember McKeown agreed 'this area will be developed,
however, she did not want to see development cross the 8/9 alley, and that is the issue.
Councilman Wiggins understood Deputy Mayor Doyle's point of view. This is an
opportunity to develop those four lots and get some return out of them.
At Deputy Mayor Doyle's request, Director Collins explained the Comprehensive Plan
map and what it reflects. Councilman Campbell moved to adopt tbe Ordinance as
read by title, citing Findings 1 - 19 and Conclusions A-F. The motion failed for lack .
of a second.
Councilmember McKeown moved to instruct staft' to bring back Findings and
Conclusions to support denial of tbe rezone. Councilman Wiggins seconded tbe
- 8 -
024
.
.
.
PUBUC HEARINGS-
QUASI JUDICIAL:
(Cont'd)
Rezone - Northwest Permit
(Cont'd)
PUBUC HEARINGS-
OTHER:
Street Vacation -
Northwest Permit
('~J" '" ''I
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 21,1998
motion, which resulted in a tie with Councilmemben McKeown and Wiggins voting
for the motion and Deputy Mayor Doyle and Councilman CampbeU voting in
opposition.
Attorney Knutson explained that, assuming Councilman Hulett will have had the
opportunity to listen to the tapes, this item can be placed on the next agenda and another
motion can be considered at that time. Discussion ensued regarding attendance at future
Council meetings. Councilmember McKeoWn moved to hold a special meeting
regarding this rezone. Councilman Wiggins seconded the motion. Following brief
discussion and clarification, a vote was taken on the' motion, which carried
unanimously.
Director Collins reminded the Council that only parties of record will be notified of the
special meeting; therefore, anyone who wishes to be notified should sign in and identifY
their interest in this matter.
B. STREET VACATION PETITION - STV 98-01 NORTHWEST PERMIT: A
portion of the 8th/9th Street alley between Lincoln and Laurel Streets: A
proposal to vacate right-ol-way
Deputy Mayor Doyle reviewed the information provided by the Planning Department and
asked Director Collins for further input Director Collins pointed out that the compensation
amount for the Ordinance needed to be addressed by the Real Estate Committee.
Therefore, this action could not be completed tonight and should be continued. Director
Collins pointed out that if the rezone is denied, this may be a moot issue. The public
hearing must be conducted due to statutory time limits. Director Collins noted that the
correct Findings and Conclusions had been distributed prior to the meeting.
Deputy Mayor Doyle reopened the public hearing at 9: 10 p.m. Director Collins reminded
the CoWlCil that anyone wishing to speak to this issue must indicate such on the sign in list.
Scott Grainger, 600 University, Seattle, Washington, representing the applicant and
property owner, stated Rite Aid and the Baldridge Group would cooperate with any
requests the Police Department may have in monitoring the high risk/activity areas. Also,
proposed development will include access to the alley; therefore, through access to Laurel
Street would still be possible.
Mark Jacobs, Transportation Planning and Engineering, stated the City is aware of the
traffic concerns on Lincoln at 8th and 9th Streets and has a'transportation services and
facilities plan that contain8 long-range issues' and solutions. Implementation of some of
these plans would allev~ate some of the concerns for this intersection.
Theresa Schmid, 114 E. 9th Street, spoke against the street vacation. She felt it would have
a negative impact on the 9th Street residents. Ms. Schmid then listed the five street
vacations which have occurred in recent years within this small area. All five vacations
closed off an avenue of transportation connected in some way to 8th or Lincoln Streets.
Ms. Schmid urged the Council to deny this vacation, again reciting her concerns regarding
traffic and the safety of children walking to school.
Nancy VanSickle, 819 S. Laurel Street, asked about traffic mitigation. Director Collins
replied that $10,000 referred to for traffic mitigation was to identify improvements that
might be needed to the intersection of 8th and Lincoln Streets to facilitate traffic flow.
Ms. VanSickle stated the alley was not really being vacated. Part of the alley was going to
be blocked otfwith access to go around the building. There are presently problems in that
alley. Ms. VanSickle feared the alley would become a short cut for young people leaving
the bowling alley and going over to Rite Aid to meet in the parking lot. Ms. VanSickle was
also concerned about commercial trucks driving through that area and parking for the other
- 9 -
025
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 21, 1998
PUBUC HEARINGS-
OTHER:
(Cont'd)
Street Vacation -
Northwest Pennit
(Cont'd)
Break
Ralston Short Plat Appeal
coriunercial entities in that area.
Kathleen Bailey, 817 S. Laurel Street, spoke in support of the alley vacation. Ms. Bailey .
gave the definition of an alley and stated this alley is being used as a by-product of 8th and
9th Streets. Ms. Bailey stated she had surveyed Peninsula Counseling Center regarding
traffic flow and discovered 820 vehicles would pass through the alley in a week.
Estimating the use of the alley for the other businesses, the amount of traffic would not fit
the definition of an alley. Ms. Bailey would like to see the alley vacated rather than being
used as a street, as is currently occurring.
Nancy VanSickle, 819 S. Laurel Street, stated she had perfonned her own traffic study and
contacted Glass Services and they rarely use alley. She did not believe the sheet rock
business used it either.
Director Collins stated the remaining alley would remain open to the parking lot for the
proposed project. There would be continued access through the alley for utility and
emergency vehicles, therefore access for residential or commercial businesses accessing
on the alley including Rite Aid.
There was no further public testimony and Deputy Mayor Doyle closed the public hearing
at 9:32 p.m. and read the Ordinance by title, entitled
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles vacating
a portion of the alley between Lincoln and Laurel
Streets located in Block 268 of the Townsite of
Port Angeles.
.
Councilmember McKeown voted to not accept the Ordinance as read by title and
to request that statY draft findings and conclusions to support this deniaL
Councilman Wiggins seconded the motion. The vote resulted in a tie with
. Councilmembers McKeown and Wiggins voting in support of the motion and
Deputy Mayor Doyle and Councilman Campbell voting in opposition.
Deputy Mayor Doyle stated a special meeting will be held when Councilman Hulett is
available and the. applicant and all participants will be notified of the meeting time and
place. Attorney Knutson infonned the Council that this issue cannot be discussed at all
prior to the final decision being voted on.
...~
Deputy Mayor Doyle recessed the meeting for a break at 9:35 p.m. The meeting
reconvened at 9:50 p.m-, at which time Mayor Braun and Councilman Williams returned
to the meeting.
c.
Ralston Short Plat Appeal
Mayor Braun reviewed the infonnation provided by the Planning Department. Attorney
Knutson asked for a revision of the usual public hearing order, as this is an appeal of a
decision made by the Planning Director as short plat administrator. Attorney Knutson
suggested the public hearing be opened and Director Collins be the first speaker to address
the issue. Mayor Braun opened the public hearing at9:55 p.m.
Director Collins described the area under discussion and gave a review of the issue. He
advised the Council that, in 1994, John Ralston had received preliminary approval to a .
short plat of Lot 4, Block 1, Highland View Acre Tracts. Having not fmalized that short
plat, Mr. Ralston applied for a new short plat in 1998, which would subdivide the lot into
three lots, all accessing on Park Avenue. The prior short plat included subdivision into
four lots, with two fronting on Park Avenue and two fronting on Highland Avenue.
- 10-
026
.
.
.
Ralston Short Plat Appeal
(Cont'd)
CITY COUNCll..MEETING
July 21,1998
Director Collins continued that short plat design standards establish that p8nhandle,
flag, or dogleg lots may be permitted if the original parcel has insufficient width to
reasonably provide each lot with a dedicated right-of-way occurring within the interior
of the plat and if there is no reasonable likelihood that standard rights-of-way could
be provided in cooPeration with abutting properties. With the use of overheads, Director
Collins noted that, in this particular situation, there is sufficient width to reasonably provide
each lot with a dedicated right-of-way as established by the 1994 preliminary plat approval.
Therefore, in his opinion, the design ~dard for permitting panhandle lots has not been
met. Further, Director Collins did not feel that the creation of more access curb cuts
on Park Avenue would be desirable. He, therefore, denied the short plat.
John Ralston, P. O. Box 1405, Port Angeles, appealed the denial of his short pla~
Referring to Page 289 of the packet, Mr. Ralston stated that it c,an not be assumed that there.
will be more curb cuts ifhe is allowed this short plat. Mr. R81ston felt one curb cut would
allow access to three lots, and he expressed his willingness to enter into an agreement
stating one curb cut would access all three parcels. Mr. Ralston cited other areas where
one curb cut accesses a multitude of homes.
Mr. Ralston stated Highland Avenue is currently 382 feet long. If Highland is extended to
RaceStreet, wetlands will have to be crossed. Mr. Ralston suggested that the owner of Lot
Three discuss with the City, a cul de sac or turn around. Using the overhead projector, Mr.
Ralston demonstrated there was no access to Lot Four from Highland Avenue, and
responded to questions posed by the Council.
Loren Olson, 1132 Highland A venue, spoke in opposition to the short plat reading from
a letter he had sent to the Council on this issue which chronicled Mr. Ralston's efforts
relative to the property in question. Mr. Olson felt Highland A venue should be improved
if more residences are going to be added.
Director Collins spoke in rebuttal to Mr. Ralston's comment regarding the extension of
Highland Avenue. State law requires adequate right-of-ways provisions must be made for
future development of properties. Mr. Ralston believes Lots A, B and C could coordinate
access to Park, it also easy for Lots I, 2,3, 4, and 17 to coordinate access to Highland
A venue. Director Collins described how the property can be accessed while avoiding
dogleg lots and without interfering with the value of Mr. Ralston's property. Director
Collins responded to questions and provided additional clarification.
Arliss Frederick,. I 103 Grant Avenue, did not wish to see any additional homes added to
this area. Ms. Frederick was concerned with the sewer system. in this area, as it is
inadequate, and this situQtWn must be resolved prior to new construction being aHowed'
John Ralston didn't feel he or Director CoHins were qualified to discuss water drainage
issues. He didn't feel his short plat would make any difference to the sewer problems that
exist in that area. Mr. Ralston also spoke in rebuttal to Director Collins's suggestions
regarding Highland Avenue.
There was no further public testimony and Mayor Braun closed the public hearing at 10:43
p.m Councilman Doyle moved to concur with the Planning Department and deny
the appeal and uphold the denial of the proposed short plat of IAt 4, Block 1,
Highland View Acre Tracts, citing Findings 1 - 11 and Conclusions A - C, as set
forth in Exhibit "D", which is attached to and becomes a part of these minutes.
Councilman Campbell seconded the motion. Discussion followed, and Councilmen
Campbell and Williams explained why they felt the denial muSt be upheld. A vote was
taken on the motion, which carried unanimously.
- 11 -
0:7
CITY COUNCn.. MEETING
July 21, 1998
Six~Year TIP and CFP
. Resolution No. 15-98
D. . Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan (l'IP) and Six-Year Capital
Facilities Plan (Cf.P)
.
. Mayor BraWl reviewed the info!'Illation provided by the Public Works Department and
opened the public hearing at 10:50 p.m.
Gary Gleason, 2211 E. 7th Avenue, a member and representative of the Non-Motorized
Advisory Committee, reviewed the information provided by the Committee which was
contained in the packet. Mr. Gleason thanked City staff for all the help in acting as
advisors. Discussion followed, and Director Collins and Interim Manager Pittis responded
to questions posed by the COWlcil regarding the TIP. and bicycle routes.
Bob Titus, Deputy Director of Utility Services, pointed out that the TIP needs to be adopted
this evening and fOlWarded to the State, but it is not required to be funded. The CFP must
be ftmded and, therefore, the bicycle needs can be considered when decisions are made to
allocate dollars.
There being no further public testimony, Mayor BraWl closed the public hearing at 11:05
p.m. and read the Resolution by title, entitled
RESOLUTION NO. 15-98
A RESOLUTION of the City COWlcil of the City of
Port Angeles, Washington, adopting the Six-Year
Transportation Improvement Program for 1998-2003.
Councilman CampbeU moved to pass the Resolutionu read by title. It 'Vas pointed
out that the Resolution must be corrected to 1999 - 2004, which was acknowledged by .
CoW1cilman Campbell as part of the motion. Councilman Wiggins seconded the moti~n,
which carried unanimously.
School Resource Officer
Program
E.
Allocation of Federal Gram Funds for School Resource Office Program
Vehicle.
. Mayor BnilDl reviewed the information provided by the Police Department and opened the
public hearing at 11: 10 p.m. There was no public testimony, and Mayor BraWl closed the
public heluing at II: 10 p.m. No action was necessary.
Special UAC Meeting
COWlciIman Doyle informed the COWlcil that there would be a special UAC meeting on
Monday, July 27, 1998, to .hear a presentation on the Electrical Strategic Plan. COWlcil. is
invited to participate in,this event.
Real Estate
Other, Considerations (Continued)
Closure of the Heckman Property
Interim Manager Pittis stated the option to purchase the Heckman property expires prior
to the next Council meeting. The owner is holding the City's option money, which will be
credited towards the purchase price of$150,OOO. Staff recommends this purchase move
fOrward to aid the Gateway Project and improve downtoWn parking. Councilmember
McKeown moved to exercise the option to purchase the Heckman property.
Councilman Williams seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Councilman Doyle asked if a work session can be held to give. the COWlcil more .
information on the Interlocal Agreement with Transit and the Downtown Association for
the Gateway Project. A work session will be held at the next regular meeting.
- 12 -
028
.
.
.
):,\'~~;:,:f(',;ti .~~.
CITY COUNCll..MEETlNG
July 21,1998
CoUncilman Doyle requested a brief explanation of Item A, Information which was
provided by Attorney Knutson.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 11: 17 p.m
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
~.~p
- 13-
Gary Braun, Mayor
029
~...~
OSD
.
.
.
4,6or8
mobile posts per unit allowing
up to 240,000 Ibs. capaci~
Features
~ No installation. All that is required is a flat, stable floor and
a power source to operate.
'" Flexible ARI-helra lifting systems can be used inside or
outside.
~ ARI-hetra lifting systems increase workshop capacity when
used together with ARI-helra's heavy-duty mobile support
stands.
@i) ARI-hetra simplifies the removal of springs, suspensions,
brakes engines and transmissions.
$ Controls are top-mounted on each post with up/down press
buttons and emergency stop.
,j\> Operation is not isolated to one master control box/post a
selection switch pennits operation from any individual column.
~ If one column is being used on a single operation, no other
column can function.
tfJJ ARI-helra's warranty is the most comprehensive in the indus-
try, backed-up by a factory-trained service network.
Engineering
@ The top-mounted gearbox, motor assembly and double-acting
. disc brake are housed in a watert:!ght aluminum extrusion.
~ Lifting is achieved through a hardened. ball bearing screw-
nut assembly suspended from the top of the column. The
expected life of this screw is ten times greater than that of
an acme thread.
00 Security devices are built into the electrical system, which
stop the lift from operating in case of an electrical failure or
overload.
@ The main control box has an electronic phase sequence re-
lay, which automatically checks the rotation of the motors
and adjusts it accordingly. In addition, if one phase is cut
off, the the system will stop automatically.
~ The slim design allows optimum visibility, which is especial-
ly important for maneuvering and positioning.
Made In The U,S.A.
.e
"Maintaining
and building
a better
community"
Jack Plttfs
Dlrector{4801J
Phytlls Ras/er
Administrative '
Assistant {4800J
Cate Rinehart
Administrative
Assistant {4700J
Bob Titus
Deputy Director {4701J
Ken Ridout
Deputy Director {4802J
Gary Kenworthy
City Engineer {4803J
steve Hursh
Engineering Manager
{4702J
Tim Smith
Contract & Project
.dmlnlstrator {4804J
Lou Haehn/en
Sr. Building Inspector
{4816J
Tom Sper1lne
Sr. Electrlcallnspector
{4735J
Scott Mclain
Power Manager {4703J
Ralph Ellsworth
Water, Wasl9water
Collection
Super1nl9ndent [4855]
Pete Surrett
Equip. ServIces
Super1nl9ndent {4835]
Marlc Shamp
Ught Operations
Manager [4731 J
Kevin Curtis
Tf98t. Plant
Supervisor [4845]
Tom McCabe
SW Collection
Supervisor {4876J
Steve Evans
landfill Supervisor
.73J
ve Wilcox
Sfrget Maintenance
- Supervisor {482S]
Fu-L.A~ H
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
August 4, 1998
MANAGER IBARRA, MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
JACK PITTIS, PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DIRECTOR
RE: BID AWARD FOR NEW MOBILE LIFTING SYSTEM
TO:
FROM:
SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATION: Bids for a new Mobile Lifting System were opened on
July 28, 1998. After a detailed review of the four bids submitted, the Public Works & Utilities
Department recommends that the City Council award the bid to Automotive Resources,
Inc. for a Herta Model #HDML-8-4 Mobile Lifting System, for the sum of $26,836.89,
including tax.
ISSUE:
Should bids be aw~rded for a Mobile Lifting
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On July 28, 1998 bids were opened for a Mobile Lifting System
to be used in the Equipment Services Garage and to replace the existing heavy duty shop
hoist that has failed. Bids were received from the following vendors:
Automotive Resources, Inc.
C. Front Co, Inc.
Enviro-Clean Equipment
$26,836.89
$35,607.00
$27,460.55
$24,601.20 [not new]
$30,778.48
Fairfax, VA
Kirkland, WA
Estacada, OR
Northwest Sales Group
Seattle, WA
The bid from Enviro-Clean Equipment for a used lift in the sum of $24,601.20 was rejected
because it did not meet the specifications for a new hoist. Funding for the equipment was
~!?proved by the City Council on July 7, 1998.
,"
JNP:jp
N:\PWKS\EQUIPSVC\CC-HOIST.WPD
031
..
032
.
.
.
aintaining
and building
a better
community"
JackPtnls
Director [4801J
Phytlis Raster
Administrative
Assistant [48ooJ
Cate Rinehart
Administrative
Assistant (47ooJ
Bob Titus
Deputy Director (4701 J
Ken Ridout
Deputy Director [4802J
Gaty Kenworthy
City Engineer [4803J
Jim Harper
Electrical Engineer
[4702J
Tim Smith
Contract & Projact
_nistrator [4804J
Haehnlen
r. Building Inspector
(4816J
Tom Sperline
Sr. Electrical Inspector
[4735J
Scott McLain
Power Manager [4703J
Ralph Ellsworth
Water. Wastewater
CoIlectJon
Superintendent (4855J
Pete Surrett
Equip. S6MC8S
Superintendent (4835J
Marie Shamp
Light OperatlOllS
Manager (4731J
Kevin CurtJs
Tf98t Plant
SUpeMsor (4845J
Tom McCabe
SW CoIlectJon
Supervisor [4876J
Steve Evans
Landfill Supervisor
[4873J
~ve Wilcox
~Maintenence
Supervisor [4825J
MEMORANDUM
Fc..A-d./~-e;;c
3
DATE: AUGUST 4, 1998
TO: CITY MANAGER, MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JACK PITTIS, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
RE:
FINAL PAYMENT AND ACCEPTANCE; EDIZ HOOK/USCG BASE
WASTEWATER FACILITIES, PROJECT NO. 92-11
I .
SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATION:.The construction of the Ediz Hook/USCG
Base Wastewater Facilities, Project No. 92-11 has been inspected and accepted as
complete. The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council
accept the project, authorize final payment to Strider Construction. Inc. in the
amount of $11,344.74, and release the retainage in the amount of $22,589.29
upon the receipt of clearances from the Department of Revenue and Labor and
Industries.
ISSUE: Should the City Council accept the Ediz Hook/USCG Base Wastewater
Facilities, Project No. 92-11, authorize final payment, and release the retainage?
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This project constructed completed the wastewater
force main and pumping stations to serve Ediz Hook and the USCG Base. The
original contract amount of the project was $440,517.94 including sales tax. The
final project cost was $487,476.93 including $31,900.47 in change orders(7) and
$15,058.52 in net quantity increases(Primarily asphalt repairs). Strider Construction
Inc. was the contractor on the project. The project was funded through an agreement
with the USCG for reimbursement of the cost of facilities constructed on the base
($262,951.28), reimbursement from leaseholders on the hool< which had pumps
installed by the project($31, 189.59), and the Wastewater Utility($193,336.08) for the
remainder of the force main construction. The Wastewater Utility will be reimbursed
by users under the developer reimbursement agreement approved earlier as new
connections are made-to the system. This reimbursement agreement will be brought
before Council for revision to reflect actual final costs of engineering and
construction.
~L.~'_
Gary W. K nwor4hy P~
City Engineer
GWK:gk
Attachments: Final Payment Req., Acceptance
Copy: Finance
Loc:N:\PROJECTS\92-11 EDZ\PROJMGT\CCFNLPMT.GWK
File: 92-11.14
033
CITY OF PORT ANGELES - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
.
"MAINTAINING AND BUlIDING A BEITER COMMUNm"
August 4, 1998
TO:
Kay Godbey, Finance Director
FROM:
Jack F>ittis, Public Works Director
RE:
Ediz Hook/USCG Base Wastewater Facilities-Project NO.92-11.14 (Final Payment #7)
Sales Tax 7.9% of subtotal
CONTRACT
Chan e Orders to Date 7
$408,265.00
$29,564.85
Ori . nal Contract Amount
Subtotal
$11,025.01
$870.98
$551.25
$34,820.10
$22,038.04
$22,589.29
$464,887.65
LESS Retaina e (5% of subtotal
Contractor Pavments Authorized to Date
Project Com 1etion
103.19%
DISBURSEMENT SUMMARY Account Nos.. See Below for Distribution
CONTRACTOR:
Strider Construction Co.
2430 East Bakerview Rd.
Bellin am, W A 98226
RETAINAGE: Escrow acct.#473549007259
Key Bank Of Washington
1200 12th Street
Bellin ham, W A 98225
US 7511-9721-4150: $ 921.76
US 7511-9722-4150: $10.422.98
TOTAL
$11,344.74
US 7511-9721-4150: $ 44.79
US 7511-9722-4150: $ 506.46
TOTAL
$551.25
TOTAL DISBURSEMENT FOR THIS PAYMENT
$11.895.99
CHANGE ORDER COMMENTS: Chan e no. 7 attached.
PREPARED BY: ~ \,.". ~
. City Eng\neer <~
APPROVED BY:
.
Loc:N:\PROJECTS\92-11 EDZ\PROJMGT\PA YMENTS\PA YREQ7.GWK
034
.
STRIDER CONSTRUCTION CO... INC
- 2430 E. Bakerview Road
Bellingham, WA 98226
(360) 676-5094
FAX (360) 734-5309
SCI Job II EZ Invoice Date: 7/9/98
To: PROJECT TITLE: Ediz Hook
Ron Johnson
City of Port Angeles CONTRACT NO.: 92-11
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362 ESTIMATE NO.: FINAL Revision - 1
PHONE (360) 417-4806 REPORT PERIOD Ending June 30,1998
FAX (360) 417-4609
Original Contract Amount w/wsst $ 440,517.94
Amount of Approvec:I Change Orders No. 1-7 w/wsst $ 31,901.30
Total EstilTl8ted ContnICt Amount: $ 472,419.24
WorK Previous Amount Total
Completed Amount This Estim8te Amount
- ----_.--- ~ ---- ._- .n -.--.--- -- --
SaseContract $ 422,221.00 $ 422,221.00 $ - $ 422,221.00
- - _H -0 ...--..-.--- ----.--- ~-~
-- . "_0 _. il!~
- .- -.---. .- ----- ---
Change Orders $ 29,565.82 $ - $ 29,56582
- ."... ____._._ _n . _._ -~---- -
-- -----. ------.. --------- -- -----.--.--- ______0
Extra Work $ - $ - $ .
___..n __ -- ..- -----.-- ~._._. ---- - --- ._.___d__ ----.- 0- -_.--
! n' 0__ ---.---.------ ---. - ~---- -------.. -.. -- -- .- - -- ..u..__
Materials on Hand $ - .$ - $ ~.'^
Gross Billing S 4I1.7N:t2
i $ -- '35.691 ~
-- -.-- .- ~. - ---- .-- ..--.. .- ---- ..------ ._..__.__.0__._'._ ._. .,-__-_'0 _ --.--.--.--..-.-- n _ . ___,_._..___, - ----_.. ---.
Sales Tax (7.9% of gross billing) >---------.--- ----
. . -. .---- ------.-.- ----~- ----- -.----.---- --.- ------. q1
i
.. __.._.L_.__ _.___ ------ -- f--------- --- ----_.- 1--___._--'*, '"
Subtotal (gross billing + sales ~L_ --- ----.- --- -- $ 487,4iM€
T
I . J..1
,- ~ ,.- ~--~---. _.-- -.---. ----------- -----.- ----- -.---- ----
Retainage (5% of gross billing) -' --- $ (22,589.J3)
I ---. ---- - -- - -. -
.-
- ---..-- --------. -- ~
Net Amount (subtotal - retainege) - .. -- -...-- $ 464, .
1 -- -.- -.- -.-----. ---
- - - -
payments Received as of 03131 /98 0- $ 453,542.91
I - ._-- --- - --------.- f---- --C.____.
- _.-. -.-. -.-'-- --'----- --- -.----.----
Still Owing From Previous Billings - --~- -.. ---- ~_n~ ~- --- -- -'--- ----. ---- -------'- - ----~ -.------
Adjustment" 1 __on - - ------ --
-- ----..-.. ----.----- .~L~
-"~ ---'- --- -- --... ~ ~ .. -- .. ------,----. -..--------- f-----
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE: S 11.34U2
We""'" ........l....the"";'; #~..;;.; otthe.;;k.....- _the..... _lD_. ------ ------.. -,.----
-- -------- .-
By: ~iJ -.A ,.... o__.~-._---~_--~ TrUe: ProjectManager Date 7/8/98
. I
__:-__"___. ____.__. ___ __ __ ..n___"-___ -'_ ___._..___~~_ - -----
"EXPLANATION ATTACHED
~~
.
j}-l..-
j)y-
f\.,V
~
~c:-
."..
J-'-
.
035
.~s
~ .---
~~
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.
7
SHEET ---1- OF 1
Contractor
Project Name EDIZ HOOK! USCG CONSTRUCTION
STRIDER CONSTRUCTION INC.
DATE:
ADri127. 1998 .
Project No.
92-11
LID No.
StatelFed. Aid No.
. DESCRIPTION OF WORK
You are ordered to perform the following described work upon receipt of an approved copy of this Change Order:
This work is revise washdown valve wiring to allow proper operation with control panel.
Such work will be compensated by: [ ] Increase or [ ] Decrease in bid items; [ ] Force Account; '(X ] Negotiated Price: The
described work affects the existina contract items and/or adds 'and/or deletes bid items as follows:
Item
No.
Description
OCVR
tI
....................
....................
....................
........................................
....................
....................
....................
::!::::!::::!!j::jjij::ijijji:jiji::i::: Quanttty
Unit
-$ Cost Per
Unit
, Cost
-Net S Cost
Adj.
Days
18-B Revise valve &
panel controls
SCI
#29
Orig.
......................................
:~:~:~:~:~:;:~:~:;;~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~~:~:!:~:~:~:;:~:~:;:;:~~:~:~:;:~
:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;::::;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:::::::;::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:::::::::::::::.:.:::::::::.:::::::: :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
Rev.
I I
Est.
I I I
Est.. $877 .42
I I
$877 .42
I
$877 .42 21
I.....mmnm[[....rml
.mmmmm
~ ~~ ~ ji ~~I ~ ~~ ~ i1 ~ ~ j~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i I~~~~ ~ ~jj~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~j~~~~ ~~ ~j ~j~1~ ~~~ ~ j~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ 11 ~ ~ ~ ~j~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~j
...................................... ................
... .. .... .. . . ... .
;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::::;:::::;:;:;:;:;:::::::;:::::::::;: :::::::::::;::::::::::::::::~:;:
~j~~~I~~~~fI~~~III~~~I~~~~~]~~~~~~~~~)~~~~~~~~~r m~f~~~!~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~
....... ..... ... ..... ..............
j::i:::::::::::::::::iijl:::::ljj:i::::ji:j::::::jjj::::::lil:::::!::jli::: ,:j:l:tj:j:l:j:!:::l!li::l:i::
. .... ....... ..........................
.............. . ..... .... ... .... .
. ORIGINAL . CURRENT . EST. NET CHANGE TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS, EST. CONTRACT AFTER
CONTRACT CONTRACT THIS CHANGE ORDER INCLUDING THIS ONE THIS CHANGE ORDER
$ 408,265.00 $ 436 952.43 $ 877.42 $29 564.85 $ 437 829.85
DAYS: 70 DAYS: 98.5 DAYS: 21 DAYS: 49.5 DAYS: 119.5
. Sales Tax Not Included ....
'All work, materials and measurements to be in accordance with the provisions of the original contract and/or the standard specifICations and special provisions for
the type of construction involvecl. The payments and/or additional time specified and agreed to in this order include every claim by the Contractor for any extra
payment or extension of time with respect to the work described ~n, including delays to the overall project.
APPROVED BY:
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
ARCHITECTIENGINEER
PROJECT ENGR.I USCG
CONTRACTOR
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
CIlY MANAGER
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL DATE:
/.-Jk
N4
"
;VA
PW-404_04 [10195J
- N:\PROJECTS\92-11EDZ\PROJMGT\CCOO7.GWK
FILE: 92-11.15
036
.
AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER FUNDS
Transfer to Payroll Fund 0
for Pay Period Ending 07-26-98
Mayor/Council 2,600.00
City Manager 3,213.04
Human Resources 3,822.02
Finance 23,461.94
City Attorney 8,380.52
Planning 5,982.10
Police 79,797.34
FirelMedic I 65,590.73
Utility Services 42,668.60
ParklRecreation 45,209.96
Cemetery 365.53
Total General Fund 281,091.78
Street 12,898.74
. Light 25,711.82
Water 19,171.75
Wastewater 9,093.70
Solid Waste 17,332.36
Equipment Services 7,440.92
Information Services 4,939.55
Firemen's Pension 961.66
Esther Webster Trust 3,924.32
Total Payroll 382,566.60.
.
0,'
/~-, '
...",'", .
..J.;
"
F
037
.
I .
.
038.
98/07/30-15:59
.
City of Port Angeles
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
Vendor
Name
001
46539 Clallam County Treasurer
46544 Daily Journal corporation
46?77 Moore Medical Corporation
46607 Washington (Rev), State of
46610 Washington State Treasurer
46626 American Swing Products Inc.
46647 Employees Association
46687 Payton Wright Ford
46689 Plantronics/Santa Cruz
46717 WA State Patrol - WASIS (HA)
CHECK REGISTER
Date FrOl 07/18/98 To 07/31/98
Vendor
Number
03075
04136
13063
23118
23120
01112
05041
16393
16089
23359
0001 46537 Clallam County Dept. of Health 03065
46551 Farwest Forestry 06201
46555 Goldzimer Consulting Group 07080
. 46559 Int'l Inst. Municipal Clerks 09013
46574 Lucent Technologies 12215
46575 MAKERS 13394
46601 Summit Law Group PLLC 19437
46604 Washington (DIS), State of 23111
46606 Washington (OASI), State of 23180
46609 Washington Audiology svcs Inc. 23274
46623 Advanced Travel 01090
0002
.
46624 AirTouch Cellular, Bellevue
46634 Clallam County YMCA
46642 Doubletree Hotel-Port Angeles
46663 Jobs Available Inc
46712 US West Communications
46713 United Parcel Service
46559 Int'l Inst. Municipal Clerks
46569 Lauderdale, Lyn L.
46574 Lucent Technologies
46604 Washington (DIS), State of
01105
03076
18112-
10022
21001
21005
09013
12277
12215
23111
Description
CVCA remittance June 1998
Annual subscription 1252713
Synetron gloves
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd qtr Leasehold Excise Taxes
Revenue from District Ct June
Revenue from District Ct June
Swing chain,bucket,swing
Picnic Supplies
New Police car 1187
Amp/Cab HSB552-1
Criminal History - M Milo
GL Code
Nulllber
1 2294000
1 237??oo
1 237??oo
1 2373000
1 2371000
1 2372000
1 2375000
1 2291000
1 2293000
1 237??oo
1 2254010
1 237??oo
1 237??oo
1 2295000
'c_ /. j -:T" ,I")
_./"'~~''-~'''''.. -<' ~
July 30 1998
Total for Department
Hepatitis B shots, TB shots 113 4131
Aviation services to Eugene 112 4990
Professional svcs-June 1998 111 4155
Annual Membership - B Upton 111 4901
7-02 billing 111 4210
7-02 billing 113 4210
Prof Svcs Science Lab pe 5-31 111 4150
Professional svcs 113 4150
Scan billing June 1998 113 4210
Scan billing June 1998 111 4210
1998 OASI Adllin fees 111 4990
Auditory tests-Wells, Ziegler 113 4131
-B Coons to Renton 7-6-98 113 4310
Braun, Ca.pbell to Tacoma 6-17 112 4310
P Ibarra-Moving expenses 7-12 111 4310
J Pittls to Sequim, Forks 6-24 111 4310
7-158illing 111 4210
98 HUll8n Services Contribution. 114 4150
Accomodations - P Ibarra 111 4310
Job Ad-Engineer/Police Officer 113 4410
7-14 Billing 111 4210
7-14 Billing 113 4210
Shipping Services 113 4150
Total for Administration
Annual membership -C Hagar
Refund Business License fee
7-02 billing
7-02 billing
7-02 billing
Scan billing June 1998
Scan billing June 1998
Scan billing June 1998
201 4901
200 9205
201 4210
230 4210
240 4210
201 4210
230 4210
240 4210
039
Page 1
AlIlOUnt
171.90
9.64-
6.11-
382.34
1,851.45
1,441.49
2,231.58
780.00
10,578.74
54.68-
112.58
1,643.53-
3.88-
24.00
15,856.24
295.00
633.54
742.07
85.00
46.50
31.00
1,620.10
656.00
53.01
184.10
77.35
60.00
10.00
403.72
1,740.02
95.25
11.05
15,000.00
609.74
194.40
136.76
91.18
35.00
22,810.79
55.00
25.00
31.00
38.75
93.00
29.60
33.56
12.11
July 30 1998
Page 2
98/07/3rr15:59
City of Port Angeles
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 07/18/98 To 07/31/98
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor
Number Name Number
46607 Washington (Rev), State of 23118
46623 Advanced Travel 01090
46648 Equifax - Credit Information 05160
46680 Microflex Inc. 13203
46712 us West Communications 21001
46715 Viking Office Products
46718 WFOA 98 Conference
0003
46544 Daily Journal Corporation
46574 Lucent Technologies
46604 Washington (DIS), State of
46613 West Group
46712 US West Communications
46715 Viking Office Products
0004
46574 Lucent Technologies
46585 Port Angeles City Treasurer
46604 Washington (DIS), State of
46712 US West Communications
22054
23326
04136
12215
23111
23018
21001
22054
12215
03062
23111
21001
.
Description
GL Code
Nulllber
AlIOUnt
2nd Qrtr excise taxes 230 4950
Bob Kajfasz to Seattle 5-2rr98 240 4310
K Godbey to San Francisco 6-28 201 4310
Credit Inquiries - July 240 4150
Tax audit program l30 4150
7-14 Billing 201 4210
7-14 Billing 230 4210
7-14 Billing 240 4210
Deskjet ink,pens,stapler,tape 201 3101
Deskjet ink,pens,stapler,tape 230 3101
Deskjet ink,pens,stapler,tape 240 3101
1998 Conference - Kay Godbey 201 4310
Conference Registr-Accounting 201 4310
132.09
47.60
469.20
1.75
295.30
91.18
113.97
273 . 53
107.44
99.96
5.42
210.00
440.00
Total for Finance
2,605.46
Annual subscription 1252713
7-02 bi II ing
Scan billing June 1998
Legal publications
7-14 Billing
Disks,pens,appointment book
311 3101
311 4210
311 4210
311 3101
311 4210
311 3101
131.64
54.22
53.30
67.71
159..
81.
Total for Atty
548.42
7-02 bill i ng
Petty cash reimbursements
Scan billing June 1998
7-14 Billing
411 4210
411 3101
411 4210
411 4210
31.00
14.82
18.80
91.18
Total for Planning
155.80
0005 46538 Clallam County Sheriff's Dept. 03074 May 1998 'inll8te care 512 5099 17,581.81
46548 Evergreen Collision Center Inc 03207 Towing services 530 4150 72.83
Towing services 530 4150 67.43
46549 FBINAA Washington Chapter Inc. 23043 Conference Registration-S Ilk 511 4310 95.00
Conference Registratn-T Riepe 511 4310 95.00
46574 Lucent Technologies 12215 7-02 billing 511 4210 54.25
7-02 billing 534 4210 38.75
7-02 bi II ing 530 4210 7.75
46577 Moore Medical Corporation 13063 Synetron gloves 530 3101 83.36
46604 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 Scan billing June 1998 511 4210 29.57
Scan billing June 1998 534 4210 7.25
Scan billing June 1998 530 4210 76.10
46608 washington (Unemp), State of 23178 2nd Quarter 1998 unemployment 533 2060 847.08
46623 Advanced Travel 01090 Steve Ilk to Spokane 6-23-98 511 4310 528_
Riepe,"cLane,et al Kent 7-14 530 4310 160
Zappey,Roggenbuck Shelton 6-28 530 4310 ,30.
Steve Ilk to Seattle 7-1-98 511 4310 12.10
" Hall to Shelton 6-27-98 530 4310 45.00
T Riepe to Seattle 7-2-98 511 4310 12.10
040
98/07/30-15:59
.
Fnd Opt Check
Number
~
.
0007
Vendor
NaRle
'.'\;":':":-i'~!:'_':~'" -, "~;1,~;:d;;4(.
City of Port Angeles
CHECK REGISTER
Date FrOll 07/18/98 To 07/31/98
Vendor
Number
46624 AirTouch Cellular, Bellevue 01105
46633 Clallam County Humane Society 03072
46681 Mt.Pleasant Auto Body & Towing 13068
46712 US West Communications 21001
46713 United Parcel Service 21005
46558, lCBO Clnt'l Conference of
46564 Kinections
46574 Lucent Technologies
46581 Oman, Brian
46586 Port Angeles Fire Department
46595 SeaWestern Inc.
46604 Washington CDIS>, State of
46623 Advanced Travel
46624 AirTouch Cellular, Bellevue
46697 Sanderson Safety Supply Co.
46712 US West C~nications
46713 United Parcel Service
46527 Angeles Plumbing Inc.
09001
11088
12215
15151
16025
19104
23111
01090
01105 -
19048
21001
21005
01039
Description
T Riepe to Spokane 6-23-98
7-15 Billing
7-15 Billing
7-15 Billing
7-15 Billing
7-15 Billing
7-15 Bill ing
7-15 Billing
7-15 Billing
7-15 Billing
July 1998 Contract payment
Towing services
7-14 Billing
7-14 Billing
7-14 Billing
Shipping Services
Shipping Services
GL Code
Nulllber
511 4310
530 4210
530 4210
530 4210
.5304210
530 4210
530 4210
530 4210
530 4210
530 4210
530 4150
530 4150
511 4210
534 4210
530 4210
530 4210
534 4210
July 30 1998
Total for Police
1997 Building Code Handbook 642 3101
Prof Svcs-Fire computer system 642 4150
7-02 billing 611 4210
7-02 billing 642 4210
7-02 billing 643 4210
7-02 billing 641 4210
Reilburse EMT class expenses 645 4310
Petty cash reimbursement 611 3101
Repair face piece 641 3101
Scan billing June 1998 611 4210.
Scan billing June 1998 643 4210
Scan billing June 1998 641 4210
B Becker to Spokane 5-6-98 645 4310
o.anr Adamich North Bend 6-26 645 4310
R Gunn to Olympia 7-21-98 641 4310
7-15 Billing 641 3101
7-15 Billing 611 4210
7-15 Billing 611 4210
7-15 Billing 641 4210
Regulator testing 641 3101
Regulator, d~aphragm 641 3101
7-14 Billing 611 4210
7-14 Billing 642 4210
7-14 Billing 643 4210
7-14 Bi II ing 641 4210
Shipping Services 641 4210
Shipping Services 643 3101
Repair hose bib,labor,material 784 4810
Total for Fire
041
Page 3
AIlount
509.91
48.23
20.74
21.60
10.38
9.39
9.39
9.39
18.01
66.91
3,325.00
134.88
159.56
113.97
22.79
11.58
31.22
24,367.24
70.59
100.00
38.75
7.75
7.75
23.25
185.64
30.92
85.71
32.12
2.91
3.01
504.94
85.00
208.80
9.39
7.97
26.72
33.41
60.00
145.72
113.97
22.79
22.79
68.38
33.38
6.53
1,938.19
111.40
98/07/30-15:59
City of Port Angeles
CHECK REGISTER
Date FroII 07/18/98 To 07/31/98
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
Vendor
Nalle
Vendor
Nullber
46574 Lucent Technologies 12215
46589 RadioShack Accounts Receivable 18003
46604 Washington (DIS),.State of 23111
46624 AirTouch Cellular, Bellevue 01105
46663 Jobs Available Inc 10022
46712 US West Communications 21001
46713 United Parcel Service 21005
46715 Viking Office Products 22054
0008
46528 Angeles Temporary Services
46574 Lucent Technologies
01076
12215
46578 NCC Inc. 14162
46584 Peninsula Bottling Co. Inc. 16071
46585 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062
46592 Roto Rooter PLullbers 18229
46598 Skagit Gardens 190n
46603 US West C~unicatiOns 21001
46604 Washington (DIS), State of 23111
46605 Washington (DOH), State of
46607 Washington (Rev), State of
23108
23118
Description
GL Code
Number
7-02 billing 711 4210
Contact cleaner 711 3101
Scan billing June 1998 711 4210'
7-15 Billing 711 4210
6-15 billing 711 4210
7-15 Billing 711 4210
Job Ad-Engineer/Police Officer 711 4410
7-14 Billing 711 4210
Shipping Services 711 3101
Shipping Services 711 4210
Post it flags, pens, binders 711 3101
Di~kettes,copyholder 711 3101
Filters,screen pads 711 3101
Arch boards, tye dye, paper 711 3101
Kochanek pe 7-15-98
7-02 bi II ing
7-02 billing
7-02 billing
7-02 bill i ng
7-02 billing
7-02 bill i ng
Cleaner
Pop, cups
Petty cash reimbursements
Petty cash rei.oursements
PLuBbing services
Credit super stuffers
Pansies,perennials
7-2 Billing.
7-08 bin ing
Scan billing June 1998
Scan billing June 1998
Scan biLling June 1998
Scan billing June 1998
Scan billing June 1998
Pool Operating permit
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
July 30 1998
Total for Public Works
866 4150
811 4210
866 4210
865 4210
861 4210
862 4210
863 4210
865 3120
861 3101
862 3101
862 9451
865 4810
865 3101
865 3101
863 4210
866 4410 .
811 4210
866 4210
861 4210
862 4210
863 4210
862 4901
866 9431
866 9435
866 9436
866 9426
866 9430
866 9434
862 9450
862 9452
862 9454
862 9455
865 9457
862 9612
042
Page 4
.
Amount
217.00
11.86
104.14
13.69
33.96
53.29
123.12
638.24
8.42
5.53
82.54
95.31
197.46
41.59
1,737.55
748.34
23.25
7.75
1~.
7.75
23.25
598.50
13.50
8.18
12.00
141.35
23.01-
101 .60
43.04
81.31
25.44
6.54
41.85
2.67
5.37
315.00
29.38
152.50
30.97
70.63
46.33
102.33
365.
203
18.
3.44
80.85
.11-
98/07/30-15:59
.
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
.
102
0007
107 0005
.
Vendor
Name
--,,, ":;"~;'~f;~!>' !~-,;:"t(i.t:,i
City of Port Angeles
CHECK REGISTER
Date FroM 07/18/98 To 07/31/98
Vendor
Number
46608 Washington (Unemp), State of 23178
46626 American Swing Products Inc. 01112
46643 Drennan-Ford Funeral Home 04243
46665 Johnstone Supply Inc. 10026
46672 LaMotte Company 12006
46693 puget Safety Equipment 16248
46712 US West Communications 21001
46721 Watermill Inc., The
46724 Xerox corporation
466C>7 Washington (Rev), State of
46574
46604
46617
46646
46693
46712
46715
Lucent Technologies
Washington (DIS), State of
Zee Medical Service Co.
Econolite Control Products
puget Safety Equipment
US West Co.munications.
Viking Office Products
46547 Eads, Bob
46574 Lucent Technologies
46579 New World Systems
46604 Washington (DIS), State of
46682 New World Systems
23010
24001
23118
12215
23111
26005
Inc 05003
16248
21001 .
22054 -
05167
12215
14184
23111
14184
Description
GL Code
Number
2nd Qrtr excise taxes. 862 9451
2nd Qrtr excise taxes 862 9626
2nd Quarter 1998 une.ployent 863 2060
2nd Quarter 1998 uneilployment 865 2060
Swing chain,bucket,swing 865 3120
Ministr.svcs-Konopaski funeral 866 4901
Motor,belts,wheel,element 862 3120
Chlorine tablets, test tube 862 3120
Plugs 866 3120
7-14 Billing 862 4210
7-14 Billing 811 4210
7-14 Billing 866 4210
7-14 Billing 865 4210
7-14 Billing 861 4210
7-14 Billing 862 4210'
, 7-14 Bi II ing 863 4210
7-14 Billing 865 4210
7-14 Billing 862 4210
Calcium hypochlorite, sodium 862 3120
Dry ink 863 3101
July 30 1998
Total for Parks & Recreation
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
102 237??oo
Total for General Fund
Total for Department
7-02 billing .
scan billing June 1998
First aid supplies
Repai,....signal controller
Respirators,gloves
7-14 Billing
Post.it flags, pens, binders
752 4210
752 4210
752 3101
752 3125
752 3101
752 4210
752 3101
Total for Public Works.
Total for Street Fund
Prof Svcs- computer system 532 6410
7-02 billing 532 4210
Creditiiwoice 70967 532 6410
Yates Travel expense 532 6410
Collins- Travel expense 532 6410
Software Installation Svcs 532 6410
Scan billing June 1998 532 4210
Public Safety Software Modules 532 6410
C~liance-Police Software 532 6410
Software Sales Tax Inv#75194-5 532 6410
0,43
Page 5
AlIOunt
290.25
139.13
1,043.92
1,929.07
746.88
80.00
131.15
65.67
51.69
40.97
68.38
22.79
22.79
45.59
22.79
68.38
38.27
36.37
984.89
431.60
9,571.53
79,591.22
515.58
515.58
23.25
1.45
63.39
282.36
165.91
68.38
27.67
632.41
1,147.99
1,960.00
131.75
1,350.00-
716.60
1,122.47
2,880.00
52.17
97,200.00
4,320.00
8,020.08
98/07/30-15:59
City of Port Angeles
July 301998
Page 6
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 07/18/98 To 07/31/98
.
Fnd Dpt Check
Number"
Vendor
Name
Vendor
Number
Description
GL Code
Number
Amount
Travel expense-Collins pe 7-10 532 6410 1,494.19
46683 Nosworthy Telecommun. Dist. 14084 Windscreen,ear cushion 532 3501 120.11
46689 Plantronics/Santa Cruz 16089 Artp/cab HSB552-1 532 3501 52.88
46712 US West Communications 21001 7-14 Billing 532 4210 387.49
46713 United Parcel Service 21005" Shipping Services 532 4210 ( 12.38
Total for PenCom 117,120.12
310 0007 46567 Lakeside Industries Inc. 12036 Prof Svcs-School sidewalk p #3 792 4150 8,078.00
Prof Svcs-School sidewalk p #3 792 4150 15,5n.85
Total for Capital Irtprovement Fund 23,655.85
314 0007 46619 Clallam Title Company 03286 Earnest money for Cronauer 715 4150 18,750.00
46635 Clallam Title Company 03286 Final Pmt on Cronauer Property 715 4150 364,252.69
46694 R J Services Inc. 18108 Fill oil tank-Old City Hall 715 4150 1,116.n
Total for capital Improvement Fund 384,119.46
320 0006 46594 Ryan Swanson & Cleveland 18205 Legal svcs-Fire Hall 621 4150 16.50
Total for Fire Station Construction Fund 16.
321 0007 46572 Lindberg Architects Inc. 12045 FED EX charges-ARK Ramos 716 4150 43.75
46580 Northland Cable Television 14144 Library outlet wiring 716 4150 120.00
46628 Badge Boys 02391 Library Occupancy signs 94-19 716 4150 67.82
Total for Library Construction Fund 231.57
401 46530 Arnold, P. S. 01380 Utility overpmt rfd-022527011 401 1222200 137.99
46531 Baits, Gary 02389 . Weatherwize incentive 401 1344000 400.00
46532 Bork, Percy 02388 Utility ovrpmt rfd-001473oo1 401 1222200 16.50
46534 Cahoon, Neal 03438 Ut i l i ty"" ovrpmt rfd-017990032 401 1222200 22.00
46536 Chaleunvong, sam 03435 Utility ovrpmt rfd-081515041 401 1222200 57.80
46540 Clark, Loretta 03439 Utility deposit rfd-017965025 4012131100 28.61
46542 Costello, Berry 03394 . Utility ovrpmt rfd-OOS843009 401 1222200 32.80
46545 Dew, Carla 04247 Utility deposit rfd-046655014 401 2131100 32.24
46553 Flores, Benjamin 06200 Utility deposit rfd-083933008 401 2131100 227.19
46557 Hausle, Estate of Jeffrey 08341 Utility ovrpmt rfd-031658011 401 1222200 106.51
46561 Johnson Jr, Jerry 10150 Rfd utility deposit-049018021 401 2131100 121.36
46563 Judd, Joy 10155 Utility overpmt rfd-018295oo3 401 1222200 131.54
46565 Kuhn, Carolyn 11153 Utility deposit rfd-013706013 401 2131100 105.45
46566 Kuykendall, Stephanie 11154 Utility deposit rfd-114855015 401 2131100 10.36
46568 Landmark Property Management 12008 Utility deposit rfd-021237029 401 1222200 164.31
Utility ovrpmt rfd-019097011 401 1222200 44.00
46570 Libera & Associates, Mike 12273 Utility deposit rfd-012653008 401 1222200 34.48
46571 Lifetime Advocacy PLus/Office 12276 Utility deposit rfd-oon06OO6 401 1222200 27.
46576 Hartin, Michelle 13347 Utility ovrpmt rfd-019534007 401 1222200 22.
46583 Panorau Hanor 16353 Utility ovrpmt rfd-033367016 401 1222200 39.14
Utility ovrpmt rfd-033383030 4011222200 17.11
Utility ovrpmt rfd-033294023 401 1222200 15.97
044
98/07/30-15:59
.
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
402
0003
.
0007
404
.7
'J,'.?-'t\:\~';< :.:,,:~\:,~tr'" _~i'~\
'~':f~,iJ,{,;
'iJ,
City of Port Angeles
CHECK REGISTER _ .
Date From 07/18/98 To 07/31/98
Vendor
Name
Vendor
Number
46692 Public Utility Dist .Clallam Co 16038
46712 US West Communications 21001
46722 Western States Electric Inc. 23025
46607 Washington (Rev), State of
23118
46701 Singer Valve Inc.
19519
Description
July 30 1998
Gl Code
Number
Petty cash rei.ourse~t
Lauridsen Blvd & L St- July
7-14 Billing
7-14 Billing
Credit. transformer
911 3101
911 3350
911 4210
911 4210
losses from 911 3403
Water June excise taxes
Water June excise taxes
Guide bushing,seals
46535 Certified Laboratories 03057 Cut-thru aerosol
46574 Lucent Technologies 12215 7-02 billing
46604 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 Scan billing June 1998
46607 Washington (Rev), State of 23118 Water June excise taxes
46624, AirTouch Cellular, Bellevue 01105 6-15 billing
46712 US West Communications 21001 7-14 Billing
7-20 Billing
46713 United Parcel Service 21005 Shipping Services
46535 Certified Laboratories 03057
46550 Family "edicine of Pt Angeles 06103
46554 Gllbertson, James 07230
46574 Lucent Technologies 12215
46604 Washington (DIS), State of 23111
46607 Washington (Rev), State of 23118
46608 Washington (Unemp), State of 23178
46692 Public Utility Dist Clallam Co 16038 -
46701 Singer Valve Inc. 19519 .
46712 US West COIIIIUni cations 21001
46720 Washington (Rev), State of
23118
46574 Lucent Technologies
46604 washington (DIS), State of
46712 US West Communications
46715 Viking Office Products
12215
23111
21001
22054
Cut-thru aerosol
CDL physical-Ron Becker
Industrial first-aid course
7-02 billing
Scan billing June 1998
Water -JUne excise taxes
2nd Quarter 1998 unemployment
Crown Z Water Rd- July
Guide bushing, seals
7-14 Billing
Total for Light
Total for Light Fund
402 2370000
402 2371000
402 2370000
Total for Department
354 3101
354 4210
354 4210
354 4950
354 4210
354 4210
354 4210
354 4210
Total for
Wastewater
753 3101
753 4310
753 4310
753 4210
753 4210
753 4950
753 2060
753 4710
753 3101
753 4210
Total for Public Works
Total for Water/Wastewater Fund
1998 2nd Quarter Excise tax
7-02 billing
Scan billing June 1998
7-14 Billing
Post it flags, pens, binders
Diskettes, copyholder
404 2370000
Total for Department
755 4210
755 4210
755 4210
755 3101
755 3101
047
Page 9
AlIOUnt
3.00
17.98
319.11
40.92
46.00-
33,883.56
42,927.37
29.34
1,n2.48
71.42-
1 ,730.40
76.98
15.50
31.33
5,204.10
1.90
45.59
28.11
6.79
5,410.30
76.98
87.50
43.70
7.75
2.96
8,448.05
1,195.31
21.76
975.42
22.79
10,882.22
18,022.92
33.34
33.34
38.75
9.49
113.97
27.67
48.02
98/07/30-15:59
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
421 0009
452 0007
454 0007
501
0007
502 0002
503 0001
City of Port Angeles
July 30 1998
Vendor
Name
46720 Washington (Rev), State of
46585 Port Angeles City Treasurer
46526 Aldergrove Construction Inc.
46533 CH2M Hill
CHECK REGISTER
Date FrOll 07/18/98 To 07/31/98
Vendor
Number
23118
03062
01286
03005
46596 Seattle Daily Journal of Comm. 19058
46607 Washington (Rev), State of
46525 AWC Distribution
46574 Lucent Technologies
46604 Washington (DIS), State of
46631 Burrett, Peter W.
46687 Payton Wright Ford
46712 US West Communications
46713 United Parcel Service
23118
01328
12215
23111
02163
16393
21001
21005
46574 Lucent Technologies 12215
46587 Professional Cartridge Care/WA 16324
46604 Washington (DIS), State of 23111
46624 AirTouch Cellular, Bellevue 01105
46712 US West Comsunications 21001
46713 United Parcel Service 21005
46529 Armory Express Pizzeria
46541 Cleland, Mike
46556 Hall, Michael D.
46560 Jacobsen, Dea
46562 Johnson, Harry
~573 Loucks, Jasper
46590 Regence Blue Shield-Dental
01340
03263
08002
10156
10047
12186
18234
Description
GL Code
Number
1998 2nd Quarter Excise tax
755 4950
Total for Public Works
Total for Solid Waste Fund
Petty cash reimbursements
913 4990
Total for Conservation Fund
Retainage 95-17 Mill Creek
Engineering svcs pe 6-26-98
793 4150
793 4150
Total for Water Construction
Landfill expansion
795 4410
Total for Solid Waste Construction
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
501 237??oo
Total for Department
Transport vehicle #87 760 6410
7-02 billing 760 4210
Scan billing June 1998 760 4210
Memory,Maxtor 5.7GB,film,disks 760 3101
New Police car #87 760 6410
7-14 Billing 760 4210
Shipping Services 760 3101
Total for Public Works
.....
Total for Equipment Services Fund
7-02 billing
IBM 4039 Marathon-Acct Laser
Scan billing June 1998
7-15 Billing
7-14 Billing
Shipping Services
2504210
250 3101
250 4210
250 4210
250 4210
250 4210
Total for Information Systems Fund
Safety ~eting luncheon 118 4909
Disability Board claim - July 121 4635
Disability Board claim- July 121 4635
Settlement of Claim #26-98 119 4999
Disability Board claim - July 121 4635
Disability Board claims- July 121 4635
Administration fee-August 1998 117 4601
048
Page 10
.
Amount
48,462.82
48,700.72
48,734.06
63.00
63.00
15,942.12
15,589.25
31,531.37
295.20
295.20
622.72
622..
836.22
7.75
5.80
268.51
22,447.60
22.79
6.62
23,595.29
24,218.01
23.25
215.80
6.20
17.43
68.38
8.43
339.49
48.87
264.00
72.
618.
10.00
14.00
1,171.80
1---
:;>(.:::,(,:-;/
'.;'..,'f..-.-,'I'-'-;
98/07/3~15:59 City of Port Angeles July 30 1998 Page 7
. CHECK REGISTER
Date FrOll 07/18/98 To 07/31/98
Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code AlIOUnt
Number Name Nulllber Nulllber
46585 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Petty cash reilburs~ts 401 2451000 72.00
Water Tank rebate-St Amand 401 1343300 25.00
Water tank rebate-Taggart 401 1343300 25.00
46591 Roberge, T L 18298 Utility overpat rfd-022926001 401 1222200 599.38
46593 RushtOn, Pam 18297 Utility ovrpmt rfd-025011oo2 401 1222200 13.63
46597 Security National 194~2 Utility ovrpat rfd-030287oo3 401 1222200 142.91
46600 Strebig, Till 19481 Utility ovrpat rfd-016438008 401 1222200 22.00
46611 Weideman, Shauna 23412 Utility deposit rfd-121452009 401 2131100 75.86
46614 Wood Realty, Doug 23185 Utility ovrpmt rfd-017710004 401 1222200 22.00
46615 Worthington, Robin 23411 Utility deposit rfd-091677025 401 2131100 43.99
46616 Yachts/Borden, Mercer 25121 Utility deposit rfd-027723002 401 2131100 63.09
46622 Action Property Management 01342 Utility ovrpmt rfd-091839024 401 1222200 15.98
46625 Alpine Realty 01312 Utility ovrpmt rfd-086436023 401 1222200 29.44
46629 Sain, Robert 02084 Utility ovrpmt rfd-105155015 401 1222200 26.47
46630 Bergre, Douglas 02390 Utility deposit rfd-018503026 401 2131100 125.00
46632 Clallam County Housing 03305 Utility ovrpmt rfd-066494019 401 1222200 40.10
Utility ovrpmt rfd-065773026 401 1222200 15.32
46636 Clayton, Richard 03440 Utility ovrpmt rfd-05612ooo7 401 1222200 112.28
46639 Daishowa America LTD 04002 Energy Smart Design incentive 401 1342000 342.00
46640 Delhur Industries Inc 04042 Utility ovrpmt rfd-079219001 401 1222200 154.36
. 46644 Dujardin 04163 Utility ovrpat rfd-114472026 401 1222200 13.00
46649 Erb, David 05168 Utility ovrpmt rfd-099686019 401 1222200 213.90
46650 Fairchild Apartments 06170 Utility ovrpmt rfd-09495100a 401 1222200 110.68
46651 First Federal Savings & Loan 06096 Utility ovrpmt rfd-073938003 401 1222200 44.86
Utility ovrpmt rfd-07392ooo3 401 1222200 138.49
46653 Frazer, Steve 06131 Utility ovrp.t rfd-1OS198012 401 1222200 18.08
46654 Freitas, Ronald 06202 Utility deposit rfd-119066009 401 2131100 125.00
46655 General Pacific Inc. 07034 Labels 401 1411000 172.64
46656 Gibson, Ruby 07256 Util ity ovrpmt rfd-032735027 401 1222200 198.33
46657 Graybar Electric Co. Inc. 07040 .Copper wire 401 1414000 924.00
Copper wire 401 1411000 77.62
46658 Guffie, Shanna 07200 Util ity ovrpmt rfd-087068016 401 1222200 23.95
46660 Holgate, Katherine 08342 Uti l it{ ovrpmt rfd-062464001 401 1222200 123.42
46661 Hopkins, Dick 08343 Utility ovrpat rfd-124564001 401 1222200 33.25
46662 Jacobs, Lori 10116 . Utility ovrpmt rfd-057525023 401 1222200 17.20
46664 Johnson, Steven 10044 - Utilityovrpat rfd-099058029 401 1222200 48.69
Utility ovrpmt rfd-099317019 401 1222200 36.46
46666 Jones & Murphy Inc. 10101 Utility ovrpmt rfd-oa1418039 401 1222200 18.24
Utility ovrpmt rfd-081477038 401 1222200 43.07
46667 Khoziem, Karla 11133 Utility ovrpmt rfd-023213019 401 1222200 75.00
46668 Kingery, Robert 11157 . Utility ovrpat rfd-088595oo3 401 1222200 106.33
46669 Kirk Rentals 11156 Utility ovrpmt rfd-086266022 401 1222200 37.45
46670 Kramer, Jada 11155 Utility deposit rfd-013587019 401 2131100 112.13
46671 LBR Construction Clnc) 12034 Utility ovrpmt rfd-094832oo1 401 1222200 100.00
Utility ovrpmt rfd-118993ooo 401 1222200 111.67
. 46673 Lappalainen, Pentti 12278 Utility ovrpmt rfd-060046002 401 1222200 32.08
46674 MacMillan, Robert P 13396 Utility ovrpat rfd-0397?6001 401 1222200 130.00
46675 Madara, Pauline 13395 Utility ovrpmt rfd-059293019 401 1222200 84.70
46677 Marquez, Diane L 13366 Utility ovrpmt rfd-040398036 401 1222200 31.40
46678 McHugh, Paul and Rochelle 13022 Utility ovrpat rfd-091669019 401 1222200 30.44
Utility ovrpmt rfd-091928031 401 1222200 21.99
045:
98/07/30-15:59
City of Port Angeles
CHECK REGISTER
Date From 07/18/98 To 07/31/98
Fnd Opt Check Vendor Vendor
Number Name Number
46679 McKenzie, Malika 13083
46688 Phipps, Marty 16392
46691 Properties by Landmark 12008
46695 Reed, James
46696 Rottman, Staci
46698 Schuler, Liliana
46699 Serenity House of Clallam Co
46700 Simmons, Beverly
46702 Smith, Marlouis
46703 Stewart, Ronald
46704 Strider Construction Co Inc
46705 Sturgeon, Mike
46706 Superior Bank FSB Servicing
46707 Thomas Construction, Bill
46708 Thomsen, Marc L
46709 Time Oil Co.
46710 Tokunage, Hiroaki
46719 Warder, Victoria
46722 Western States Electric Inc.
46723 Wildwood Terrace
0009
46546
46552
46574
46582
46585
46588
46604
46608
46624
46645
46648
46684
46690
18300
18299
19377
19362
19522
19523
19524
19447
19147
19525
20202
20203
20067
20199
23414
23025
23159
EES Consulting Inc. 05140
Federal Express Corp. 06022
Lucent Technologies 12215
PacifiCorp 16360
Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062
Public Utility Dist Clallam Co 16038 -
Washington (DIS), State of 23111
Washington (Unemp), State of 23178
AirTouch Cellular, Bellevue 01105
EES Consulting Inc. 05140
Equifax - Credit Information 05160
O'Donnell, David. 15152
Port Angeles City Light 16083
Description
GL Code
Number
Utility ovrpmt rfd-089206027 401 1222200
. Uti l ity deposit rfd-032565032 401 2131100
Uti l ity ovrpmt rfd-057142oo3 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-05557oo2 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-Q33553oo7 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-060534018 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-088960024 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-050172019 401 1222200
Utility deposit rfd-Q29041025 401 2131100
Utility ovrpmt rfd-091782017 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-060569009 401 1222200
Utility deposit rfd-080942oo2 401 2131100
Utility ovrpmt rfd-006378003 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-097767oo1 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-12455900 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-124548001 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-045667006 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-060852oo2 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-124382oo1 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-064327006 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-124222oo1 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-081477039 401 1222200
Utility ovrpmt rfd-104655013 401 1222200
Copper crimpits 401 1411000
Bolts,locking rings 401 1411000
Credit bracket-inv dated 31997 401 1411000
Utility ovrpmt rfd-086754018 401 1222200
July 30 1998
Total for D~partment
Professional services - June 911 4901
Shipping services 911 4210
7-02 billing 911 4210
May-June Short-term energy 911 3340
Petty cash reimbursements 9114810
SR 101 & Euclid Ave- July 911 3350
Scan billing June 1998 911 4210
2nd Quarter 1998 unemployment 911 2060
7-15 Billing 911 4210
7-15 Billing 911 4210
7-15 Billing 911 4210
7-15 Billing 911 4210
7-15 Billing 911 4210
7-15 Billing 911 4210
June Svcs-Strategic Plan 911 4150
Credit Inquiries - July 911 4150
Reimbursmnt for safety glasses 911 3101
Petty cash rei~rsement 911 4150
Petty cash reimburseMent 911 3101
Petty cash reimburSeMent 911 3101
Petty cash reimbursement 911 3402
Page 8
.
AlDOUnt
71.25
75.42
208.68
123.52
BO.74
29.55
92.75
33.39
163.99
54.47
27.66
250.00
36.01
38.87
13.00
30.25
32.14
147.16
51.81
126.69
40..
30.
15.96
521.16
262.20
540.90-
13.00
9,043.81
439.06
15.50
108.50
21,138.50
25.46
16.90
22.94
7,852.00
9.39
9.39
48.37
9.39
9.39
9.39
3,673.92
10'11
100.
14.
8.62
25.00
2.04
046
98/07/30-15:59
.
Fnd Dpt Check
Number
621 0002
625 0008
6.
,,':!,~~:,:':~ ~"1~"/:'~-'"T~,'1+ l.',\~5";~?,?;
City of Port Angeles
Vendor
Name
46602 UNUM Life Ins Co of America
46612 Wells, Mike
46638 Curtis, Kevin
46676 Madison, Don
July 30 1998
CHECK REGISTER
Date Fro~ 07/18/98 To 07/31/98
Vendor
Number
21000
23065
03099
13001
46522 Adamich & Catract Construction 01277
46627 Angeles Electric Inc. 01071
46637 Cozi Homes Construction 03299
46686 Paratex Certified Inc. 16219
46715 Viking Office Products 22054
46585 Port Angeles City Treasurer
46641 District 13
46607 Washington (Rev), State of
03062
04050
23;18
Description
GL Code
Number
.
Disability coverage prem-Aug 121 4631
Disability Board clai.s-July 121 4635
OUt-patient care reillburse.ent 121 4630
Health plan reimbursment 121 9750
Total for Self - Insurance Fund
60X Advance-Schueler 96PA53L 214 4150
Final payment - J Vanderwaal 214 4150
Final pmt- Harriet Cruff 214 4150
Pest inspection-Fred Eckenberg 214 4150
Universal fax rolls 214 3101
Total for P.A. Housing ReHab Project
Petty cash reimbursements 888 3101
Petty cash reimbursements 888 3101
Referees for Basketball league 882 4150
Total for Recreational Activities Fund
2nd Qrtr excise taxes
650 2319100
Total for Off - Street Parking Fund
652 0008 46574 Lucent Technologies 12215 7-02 billing 868 4210
46604 Washington (DIS), State of 23111 Scan billing June 1998 868 4210
46659 History of. the World 08331 Travel expenses 868 4530
Travel expenses 868 3101
46712 US West Co.munications 21001 7-14 Billing 868:4210
6-14 Billing 868 4210
698
.
46599
46652
46685
46711
46714
46716
States West Life Insurance Co.
Flex-Plan Services (Payroll)
Office of Support Enforcement
US Depart.ent of Education
United Way
Volunteer Fire Association
19313
06062 -
15072
21075
21028
22060
40'"
Total for Esther Webster Trust Fund
Life Insurance premium -August 698 2315160
Payroll deductions pe 7-26-98 698 2315210
Payroll deductions pe 7-26-98 698 2315210
Payroll deductions pe 7-26-98 698 2315210
Payroll deductions pe 7-26-98 698 2315240
. Payroll deductions pe 7-26-98 698 2315210
Total for Accounts Payable Clearing Fund
Grand Total
049
Page 11
AlIOUnt
1,642.32
27.00
11.78
375.00
4,254.82
7,091.49
2,969.00
3,307.14
64.74
18.87
13,451.24
3.20
25.00
1,080.00
1,108.20
567.90
567.90
7.75
25.24
231.55
47.00
22.79
45.81
380.14
737.80
1,064.79
894.83
46.50
420.38
46.00
3,210.30
794,986.73
&....~
050
.
( .
.
.
'I ) - A
.
PLANNING .DEP ARTMENT MEMORANDUM
Brad Collins. Director, Extension 4751: Sue Roberds, Extension 4750: David Sawyer, Extension 4752
July 31, 1998
I .
TO:
Mayor Braun, City Council members, and Interim Manager Pittis
FROM:
Planning Department, Brad Collins, Planning Director
SUBJ:
REZONE APPLICATION - REZ 98-03
NORTHWEST PERMIT - Ninth Street between Lincoln and Laurel Streets
RECOMMEND A TION/ ACTION:
.
Council could concur with the recommendation, of the Planning Commission to approve the rezone
request by adoption of the attached draft orainance supported. by the attached findings and
conclusions, or move to deny the proposal citing findings and conclusions in support of the action.
BACKGROUND/SUMMARY:
On July 8, 1998, the Planning Commission conducted a public meeting for consideration of a request
submitted by Northwest Permit t6rezone property from RS-7, Residential Single Family to CSD,
Community Shopping District. Following the meeting, the Planning Commission voted 4 - 2 to
, recommel'ld approval of the proposal. The City Council conducted a public hearing on July 21,
1998, following which the City Council continued its deliberation to a special meeting at which an
additional member of the Council could be'present. It was later decided thata special meeting would
not be necessary but that the issue would/be plac~ on Council's regular August 4 meeting for
action. StafTwill be available for questions.
Attachments: Ordinance
Findings and Conclusions
Minutes
Staff Report
. 051
.
.
~.."
.
052
j't"'--!-.i.)' -~" . - l'~~ j.--k<
.:."1..........
q- . .
~.~~~ .
;:"~'
.
ORDINANCE NO. .
AN ORDINANCE of the Ci~ of Port Angeles
rezoning property located m Block 268 of the
Townsite of Port Angeles from Residential Single Family
to Community Shoppmg District and amending
. Ordinance No. 2801, as amended. .
.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Port Angeles has held a
. public meeting and recorded its recomniendation to the City Council in the. Planning
Commission minutes of July 8; 1998; and
WHEREAS, the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (Chapter
43.21C RCW) have been met; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after a public hearing, finds that said rezone
would be in the best interest of the City and its citizens, would be consistent with the changed
circumstances since the previous zoning designation was adopted, and would be consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT
ANGELES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. The Official Zoning Map (Ordinance No. 2801) is hereby amended
to change the zoning of the following described properties from RS-7, Residential Single
Family, to CSD, CommumtyShopping District:
Lots 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 268, Townsite of Port Angeles.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to attach a copy of this Ordinance
to the Official Zoning Map and to file a certified copy with the Clallam County Auditor and
Clallam County Assessor.
. Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective five (5) days after the date of
publication.
PASSED by the City Coun~il'of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting
of said Council held on the 21 st day of Jilly, 1998.
Gary Braun, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
.
Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk
PUBLISHED:
Craig Knutson, City Attorney
By Summary
053
.
.
. ,-
.
054
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF REZONE APPLICATION REZ 98-03,
Northwest Permit:
. Findings:
Based on the information provided in the public record including the application file, the
staffreport and its attachments, comments received during the public comment period, the
Planning Commission's deliberation, and the public hearing testimony, the Port Angeles City
Council hereby finds:
1. The applicant, Northwest Permit submitte.d the application to the Planning
Department on February 9, 1998. A Determination of Completeness was issued on
February 12, 1998, and the written public comment period initially ran from
February 12, 1998 to February 27, 1998. In response to public request, the public
written comment period was extended to March 6, 1998.
2. The proposal is to rezone four lots (Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16 of Block 268 in the
Townsite of Port Angeles), approximately 28,000 square feet of property, from RS-7,
Residential Single Family to CSD, Commercial Shopping District (Attachment A to
the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8, 1998).
3.
The proposed rezone is part of the applicant's overall proposal to develop 90,000 s.f.
of the southwest comer of Lincoln Street and 8th Street (extending to 9th Street) with
an approximately 17,000 s.f. retail store. The overall proposal includes this rezone
request and a street vacation request for the eastern portion of the Eighth/Ninth
Streets alley.
.
4. As part of the application's SEP A review, a traffic analysis was requested of the
applicant on February 13, 1998.
5. On April 20, 1998, the Planning Department received a letter from the applicant
waiving the City's 120 day permit processing requirement due to the applicant's
delay in preparing the requested traffic analys;s.
6. On May'14, 1998, the Planning Department received the requested traffic analysis
and on June 3, 1998, the Planning Departnient received an addendum to the analysis
with comments regarding Ninth Street, Laurel Street, and the Eighth/Ninth Streets
alley.
7. This application was originally scheduled for Planning Commission consideration
on March 11, 1998, at which time it was continued, due to lack ofa traffic report and
a SEP A determination, to April 22, 1998. On April 22, 1998, it was again continued
for the same reason until June 10, 1998, at which time it was continued until July 8,
1998, to accommodate the resulting Mitigated Determination of Non Significance
(MDNS) required comment period. .
8.
The SEP A Responsible Official issued a MDNS for the proposal on June 3, 1998
(Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July
8, 1998). Mitigation measures include no commercial traffic access to the project
site from Ninth Street. The MDNS was mailed to all persons who submitte~~n
comments related to the applicant's environmental checklist, and the comment period
for the MDNS ran until June 19, 1998.
.
9.
10.
. 13.
On.June 26, 1998, the City's SEPA Responsible Official re-issued the Mitigated
Determination of Non-Significance with an additional mitigation measure requiring
certain development aspects of the project be subject to further review.
.
The public had an opportunity to co~ent on the proposal during the written
comment period provided which ran from February 12 to March 6, 1998. All of the
written comments received during this time are included as Attachment D to the
Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8, 1998. The issues
addressed include increased traffic on Ninth Street, potential crime, increased noise
and lighting, the general impact of the project on the Cherry Hill residential area, and
the availability of alternative commercial properties.
11. The subject area is within the undesignated area between the Comprehensive Plan's
Commercial land use designation to the north and the Residential designation to the
south. It is currently zoned RS-7.
12. The subject area is level and is currently developed with two single-family residences
and an unimproved parking lot used by a business located on property to the north
of the rezone area. The adjacent properties are developed with the following uses:
To the north:
To the south:
To the east:
To the west:
commercial uses;
single family residences;
single family residence; and
single family residences.
The adjacent properties are zoned as follows:
.
To the north:
To the south:
To the east:
To the west:
CSD;
RS-7;
CSD; and
RS-7.
14. The City's Comprehensive Plan identifies Lincoln Street as a principal arterial street
and Eighth Street as a minor arterial street.
15. The traffic analysis noted the Eighth and Lincoln Street intersection currently
functions at an average level of service (LOS) D, and projected that in the year 2000
it will continue to functi<:m at an average LOS ofD with and without the proposed
project.
16. The traffic arialysis noted the Eighth and Lincoln Street intersection currently
functions at a seasonal level of service (LOS) E, and projected that in the year 2000
it will continue to function at a seasonal LOS ofE without the proposed project, and
a seasonal LOS of F with the project as proposed. The report projects the
intersection will operate at a seasonal LOS of E with the project if the project is
subject to the report's mitigation measures.
17.
The City Engineer reviewed the traffic analysis and recommended a revision to the
report's mitigation measures. With the project subject to the revised mitigation
measures, the City Engineer states the average LOS for the Eighth and Lincoln
Streets intersection will remain at D in the year 2000, and the seasonal LOS will
remain at E.
05.
.
.
.
Conclusions:
18.
19.
,,~, :.i\~P(: ;}';': :<*,~,;i/S:!~, - ~{:t'r:r~f,'!~<f;:'~~Wd} ~"~10~'\i~\,
. "'--~ ,
The Department of Transportatifi~bomments are included as Attachment E to the
Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8, 1998. They address
the impact of the overallpr~ject on the Lin9~ln Street and 8th Street intersection,
stormwater issues, sigriagerequiremerits~ahd a recommendation the proposed
development of the overall site be accessed from 9th Street instead of Lincoln Street
(SR 101). .
Since the zoning for the subject property was adopted, there have been several
. changes in circumstances relevant to the proposed rezone. First, the City has
approved several other rezones and/or street vacations in the same zone and vicinity
due to the need to locate larger scale retail.stores than can be placed in the existing'
block and street grid pattern. Second, the closure of the Rayonier Mill and expansion
of retail activity outside the City limits have occurred which have had a depressing
effect on business reinvestment in the City's retail areas.
I .
Based on the information provided in the public record including the application file, the staff report
and its attachments, written comments received during the public cominent period, the Planning
Commission's deliberation, the public hearing testimony, and the above findings, the Port Angeles
City Council hereby concludes:
A. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are most relevant to the proposal: Land
Use Policies Al and A2, Cl, Dl, and E7.
F.
B.
C.
D.
E.
The proposed rezone as mitigated in the project's revised MDNS dated June 26,
1998, is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policies Al and A2, C1, D1, and E7.
The proposal is in the public use and interest and is compatible with the surrounding
zoning and land uses.
The proposed rezone will result in an increase of economic activity in the City, which
is in the public interest.
As mitigated in the project's revised MDNS dated June 26, 1998, the proposal will
not have a negative impact on adjacent residentially zoned and developed properties
along Ninth Street.
If the property is not developed as part of the applicant's overall development plan
as described in Attachment A to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-
03 dated July 8, 1998, and as mitigated in the project's revised MDNS attached as
Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8,
1998, the City should amend the Comprehensive Plan policies to ensure that high
057
intensity commerial development is served by arterial streets of sufficient size to
satisfy traffic demand and to lessen neighborhood traffic congestion or consider a
rezone of the property back to RS-7. .
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of August 4, 1998.
Gary Braun, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
C:\ WP\DAIL Y\MEMO.CC4
.
..~.
.
n;~
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 5
PUBLIC MEETING:
REZONE APPLICATION - REZ 98-03 NORTHWEST PERMIT, Ninth
Street between Lincoln and Laurel Street: Request to rezone property
designated RS-7, Residential Single Family, to CSD, Community Shopping
District. (This item is continued from June 10, 1998.)
Commissioner Nutter stated that she has a friend who is a property owner in the area and
would stand down from the proceedings if requested to do so. No' one objected and'so she
remained.
Senior Planner Sawyer reviewed the Planning Department's staff report recommending
approval of the request.
City Engineer Kenworthy stated that the Eighth Street intersection is fully protected in that
left turns are made only with a left turn arrow. He explained that the difference between
fully protected versus permissive traffic signalization is that permissive signalization is a turn
at will situation. The City would rather have fully protected signalization at this intersection
for the present.
In response to Commissioner Reed, Mr. Sawyer affirmed that Conclusion "F" suggested by
staff concludes that if the property is not developed as proposed, it should be rezoned back
to its residential designation.
Following lengthy discussion regarding the Washington State Department of
Transportation's comments as to access onto Lincoln (SR 101), it was determined that
whatever development occurs on the site would have to satisfy both the State's and the City's
concerns to proceed.
Commissioner ,Souders noted that the Planning Commission's 'discussion should be
concerned with the highest use that could develop on a CSD-zoned property and whether
those uses would be compatible at this loc~t!on.
Planner Sawyer reminded the Commission that the rezone consideration is not for the entire
2.2 acre development proposal being presented by Northwest Permit, but only for the four
most southwesterly lots as the remainder ofthe properties are already zoned CSD. Headded
that the environmental review performed for the rezone included the overall development
proposal as submitted by Northwest Permit, and if a significantly different development is
proposed, additional review under SEP A may result in different mitigation measures.
Engineer Kenworthy responded to Commission Ziakin explaining the difference between
average and seasonal traffic counts. Level of service (LOS) criteria are analyzed for average,
not seasonal, traffic counts. Seasonal LOS can drop below what is acceptable for the average
LOS. He responded to Commissioner Craver that he feels comfortable with the proposal and
the developer's ability to deal with the Department of Tral1sportation's requirements for
development of the site. He further explained the information provided to the engineering
consultant used to formulate the requested traffic study of the Eighth/Lincoln Street
intersection and 'surrounding streets.
059
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 6
.
At Commissioner Souders' request, Planner Sawyer noted that mitigation measure No. 7 was
added to the proposal's Mitigated Determination of Non Significance following the
public/agency comment period by the Planning Director. He agreed that these measures are
also addressed in the City's zoning/development standards for the CSD zone. The added
mitigation measure requires continued review by the City's SEPA Official of the project's
design, landscaping and screening features. He stated that as he understood the mitigation
measures; a separate SEPA review process for the project's building permit would not be
required unless the original plans are significantly changed. Although he signed the revised
MDNS as the Acting SEPA Official, Brad Collins is the City's SEPA Official, and was the
person who originally reviewed the project and issued the original MDNS. Mr. Collins also
reviewed the subsequent public/agency comments and worded the additional mitigation
measure for the revised MDNS prior to leaving on vacation. Consequently, if the Planning
Commission is concerned with the SEP A decision, they may wish to confirm this
interpretation of the additional mitigation measure (No.7) with Mr. Collins following his
return. The impact of developing the four lots individually was not performed and if
proposed, may require further environmental review ifthe proposed development qualifies
for SEPA review.
Scott Grainger, Baldridge Group, 600 University #3012, Seattle, 98101, responded at the
request of Commissioner Hewins that if the project is required by the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to access onto Ninth Street instead of Lincoln .
Street, the project would probably not go forward. Access onto Ninth Street would also fly
in.the face ofthe neighborhood's objections.
Commissioner Ziakin. summarized that there appear to be four key issues of concern: the
reduction of traffic safety; the issue of rezoning back to re~idential if the subject project does
not result as proposed; the WSDOT access issue onto Lincoln Street; and the impact of four
additional individual comm~rciallots being created on Ninth Street. He asked the applicant
about attempts to utilize available commercial properties.
Mr. Grainger responded that the subject property was not, and is not actively on the market.
Based on an in depth market analysis, the subject intersection was considered to bethe best
site for the market to support the sales in the proposed commercial store. If the site is not
developable as proposed, Rite Aid will either remain at its existing Seventh/Lincoln Street
location, or close the store and channel business to the east side store. He explained what
criteria are used for site selection.
Commissioner Craver asked Mr. Grainger if Rite Aid has been working with WSDOT. Mr.
Grainger indicated that an access permit has been applied for but they have not begun talking
about mitigation measures. They are involved with approximately thirty projects state wide
with WSDOT and have an excellent working arrangement. If access onto Lincoln Street
cannot be obtained, he believes the project will not go forward.
Commissioner Reed wondered if, given the criteria of size, compatibility, direct benefit to 06. .
the owner/neighborhood, and isolation, could the proposal be considered a spot zone.
Planner Sawyer responded that in this case the contiguous CSD zone is being extended and
the proposal would not be a case of spot zoning.
.
.
.
......"'"1'{:;"~ I,.,
,!/.~~;~': ,_-1:(,'+ ;,"',~!"'!;0:;:-~:~ ~.;l:~
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 1998
Page 7
Commissioner Craver was concerned that if rezQned and not developed as intended, the
resulting four lots would impact the neighborhood far more than the proposed site
development.
Commissioner Souders was concerned that the traffic impacts to surrounding neighborhood
streets has not been addressed adequately at this point. The traffic report d.eals mainly with
the main arterials, Lincoln and Eighth Streets, but not enough analysis has been performed
on:the neighboring streets. . .
Commissioner Craver stressed that the professional traffic consultants and the City's
Engineering Division has reviewed the situation and has said that the resulting traffic
patterns will be acceptable and will not be affected with or without the project by the year
2000. Not being an expert on traffic, she feels that decision m3.kers have to rely on those
who are skilled in dealing with traffic impacts.
In response to Commissioner Reed, as to what course of action would be taken if the site is
not developed as proposed, Planner Sawyer respond~d that, based upon Conclusion "F" in
staffs report, the Planning Commission could direct staff to schedule a rezone request on its
agenda for the four subject lots.
In response to Commission~r Nutter's statement that Eighth Street has been designated as
a cross town bicycle route but that no accomodation to designate the Eighth Street frontage
of the site as such has been made, Engineer Kenwortl1Y responded that bicycle lanes require
the elimination of parking. Given the width of Eighth Street at present, only the elimination
of parking along one side or the othehvouldallowia designated bicycle lane.
Commissioner Craver summarized that the issue is whether this proposal presents a logical
location for commercial development or not.
Commissioner Hewins mov~d.torec()mmend approval of the rezone as proposed citing
the following" findings 'and conclusions: .
....
Findings..:
Based on the information provi~~in the public record including the application file, the
staff report and its attachments;, comments received during the public comment period, and
the Planning Commission's deliberation, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission
hereby finds:
1.
The applicant, Northwest Permit submitted the. application to the Planning
Department on February 9,J 998. A Determination of Completeness was issued on
February 12, 1998, and the written public comment period initially ran from
February 12, 1998 to February 27, 1998. In response to public request, the public
written comment periqd was extended to March 6, '1998. .
2.
061
The proposal is to rezone four lots (Lots. 13, 14, 15 and 16 of Block 268 in the
Townsite of Port Ahgeles);approximately 28,000 square feefofproperty, from RS-7,
Residential Single Family to CSD, Commercial Shopping District (Attachment A to
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 8
the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8, 1998).
.
3. The proposed rezone is part of the applicant's overall proposal to develop 90,000 s.f.
of the southwest corner of Lincoln Street and 8th Street (extending to 9th Street) with
an approximately 17,000 s.f. retail store. The overall proposal includes this rezone
request and a street vacation request for the eastern portion of the Eighth/Ninth
Streets alley.
4. As part of the application's SEP A review, a traffic analysis was requested of the
applicant on February 13, 1998.
5. On April 20, 1998, the Planning Department received a letter from the applicant
waiving the City's 120 day permit processing requirement due to the applicant's
delay in preparing the requested traffic analysis.
6. On May 14, 1998, the Planning Department received the requested traffic analysis
and on June 3, 1998, the Planning Department received an addendum to the analysis
with comments regarding Ninth Street, Laurel Street, and the Eighth/Ninth Streets
alley.
7.
10.
This application was originally scheduled for Planning Commission consideration
on March 11, 1998, at which time it was continued, due to lack of a traffic report and
a SEP A determination, to April 22, 1998. On April 22, 1998, it was again continued
for the same reason until June 10, 1998, at which time it was continued until July 8,
1998, to accommodate the resulting Mitigated Determination of Non Significance
(MDNS) required comment period.
.
8. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a MDNS for the proposal on June 3, 1998
(Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July
8, 1998). The MONS was mailed to all persons who submitted written comments
related to the applicant's environmental checklist, and the comment period for the
MDNS ran untit'June 19, 1998.
9. On June 26, 1998, the City's SEP A Responsible Official re-issued the Mitigated
Determination of Non-Significance with an additional mitigation measure requiring
certain development aspects of the project be subject to furtherreview.
The public had an opportunity to comment on the proposal during the written
comment period provided which ran from February 12 to March 6, 1998. All ofthe
written comments received during this time are included as Attachment D to the
Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8, 1998. The issues
addressed include increased traffic on Ninth Street, potential crime, increased noise
and lighting, the general impact of the project on the Cherry Hill residential area, and
the availability of alternative commercial properties.
.
062
11.
The subject area is within the undesignated area between the Comprehensive Plan's
Commercial land use designation to the north and the Residential designation to the
south. It is currently zoned RS-7.
':~1,3:;::~".,1'i~!;}1 t'u'~:-:'<;,.::;;_;:;)' "j' .tf';~,~~~~~(~~':;f;
...~
"~'fl
:~:
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 9
.
12.
The subject area is level and is currently developed with two single-family residences
and an unimproved parking lot'used by a business located on property to the north
of the rezone area. The adjacent properties are developed with the following uses:
To the north:
To the south:
To the east:
To the west:
commercial uses;
single family residences;
single family residenqe; and
single family residences.
I .
13. The adjacent properties ~e zoned as follows:
To the north:
To the south:
To the east:
To the west:
CSD;
RS-7 ;
CSD; and
RS-7.
14. The City's Comprehensive Plan identifies Lincoln Street as a principal arterial street
and Eighth Street as a minor arterial street.
15.
The traffic analysis noted the Eighth and Lincoln Street intersection currently
functions at an average level of service (LOS) D, and projected that in the year 2000
it will continue to function at an average LOS ofD with and without the proposed
project.
.
16. The traffic analysis noted the Eighth and Lincoln Street intersection currently
functions at a seasonal level of service (LOS) E, and projected that in the year 2000
it will continue to function at a seasonal LOS ofE without the proposed project, and
a seasonal LOS of F with the project as proposed. The report projects the
intersection will operate at a seasonal LOS of E with the project if the project is
subject to the report's mitigation measures.
17. The City Engineer reviewed the traffIc analysis and recommended a revision to the
report's mitigation measures. With the project subject to the revised mitigation
measures, the City Engineer states the average LOS for the Eighth and Lincoln
Streets intersection will remain at D in the year 2000, and the seasonal LOS will
remain at E.
18. The Department of Transportation comments are included as Attachment E to the
Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8, 1998. They address
the impact of the overall project on the Lincoln Street and 8th Street intersection,
storm water issues, signage requirements, and a recommendation the proposed
development of the overall site be accessed from 9th street instead of Lincoln Street
(SR 101).
. Conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the public record including the application file, the staff report () h ~
and its attachments, written comments received during the public con,unent period, the Planning
A. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are most relevant to the proposal, Land
Use Policies Al and A2, Cl, Dl, and E7:
B. If the property is developed as part of the appli~ant's overall development plan as
described in Attachment A to the Planning Department StaffRep6rt for REZ 98-03
dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MDNS attac~ed. as
Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8,
1998, the rezone is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policies Al and A2, Cl, Dl,
and E7.
C. If the property is developed as part of the applicant's overall development plan as
described in Attachment A to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03
dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MDNS attached as
Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8,
1998, the rezone is in the public use and interest and is compatible with the
surrounding zoning and land uses.
D.
lfthe property is developed as part of the applicant's overall development plan as
described in Attachment A to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03
dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MDNS attached as
Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8,
1998, the rezone will result in an increase of economic activity in the City.
.
E. If the property is not developed as part of the applicant's overall development plan .
as described in Attachment A to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-
03 dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MDNS attached as
Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8,
1998, the rezone could have a negative impact on adjacent residentially zoned and
developed properties along Ninth S~.eet.
F. If the property is not developed as .part of the applicant's overall development plan
as described in Attachment A to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-
03 dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MDNS attached as
Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8,
1998, the City should consider a rezone of the property back to RS-7.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Craver and passed 4 - 2, with
Commissioners Ziakin and Nutter voting in the negative.
Commissioner Ziakin stated that although he is in favor of commercial developmeQ,t, he does
not believe the rezone is in the best interest of the community. due to a reduction in traffic
safety, creeping encroachment into the residential neighborhood, the access issue to Lincoln
Street, and the impact of future commercial use of the four lots if the proposal does not go
forward. Commissioner Nutter agreed. Chair Reed noted that the City Council will conduct
a public hearing on July 21st, 7 p.m
~.
Of'5
.......~~........
..-',:.. '~.. .
". -:..~,~
,.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF JmPORT
DATE:
Planning Commission
~ yf'anning Department
'Y July 8, 1998
REZ 98-03
TO:
FROM:
RE:
APPLICANT:
Northwest Permit
LOCA nON:
. The Baldridge Group
Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16 of Block 268 in the Townsite of Port Angeles which
are located near the northwest intersection of Lincoln Street and 9th Street.
OWNER:
REQUEST:
The proposal is to rezone four lots, approximately 28,000 square feet of
property, from RS-7, Residential Single Family to CSD, Commercial
Shopping District (see Attachment A).
.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The SEP A Responsible Official issued a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance for the
proposal on June 3, 1998 (attached as Attachment B). The MONS was mailed to all persons who
. submitted wrinen comments related to the applicant's environmental checklist and the- comment
period for the MONS ran until June 19, 1998.00 June 26, 1998, the City's SEPA Responsible
Official re-issued the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance with an additional mitigation
measure requiring cenain development aspects oftho:project be subject to further review. .
BACKGROUND:
The proposed rezone is part of the applicant's overall proposal to develop 90,000 s.f of the
southwest comer of Lincoln Street and 8th Street (extending to 9th Street) with an approximately
17,000 s.f retail store. The overall proposal includes this rezone request and a street vacation request
for the eastern portion of the 8th and 9th Streets alley.
.
This application is for a site specific rezone and is limited to a single public hearing which is scheduled
before the City Council on July 21, 1998. The Planning Commission will make its recommendation
~lely on the infonnation contained in the file and its discUssion during the public meeting. . The public
had an opportunity to comment on the proposal during the noticedwrinen comment period which
ran from February 12 to March 6, 1998. All of the written comments received during this time are
included as part of this staft'report. The public will also be able to give verbal testimony at the public 0 66
P1aDDiDI DeparaDeDl Staff Report
REZ 98-03 - Nordlwest PermIt
July 8. 1998
Page 2
hearing before the City Council.
Please keep in mind this is a rezone decision and there is no assurance that a specific project will be
developed as ~ result of this action.
DISCUSSION:
Location andExisting Land Uses:
The area proposed for rezone consists of four townsite lots (#13, #14, #15 and #16 of Block 268
TPA) located near the northwest comer of Lincoln Street and 8th Street. The area is level and is
currently developed with two single-family residences and an unimproved parking lot used by a
business located on property to the north of the r~ne area. The adjacent properties are developed
with the following uses:
To the north:
To the south:
To the east:
To the west:
commercial uses;
single family residences;
single family residence; and
single family residences.
Traffic Analysis:
A traffic analysis report prepared for the overall development proposal (a 17.000 s.f retail store on
a 90,000 s.f site) stated the 8th an.d Lincoln Street intersection currently functions at an average level
of service (LOS) ofD and projected that in the year 2000 it will continue to function at an average
LOS of D with and without the proposed project. The report noted the 8th and Lincoln Street
intersection currently functions at a seasonal LOS orE and projected that in the year 2000 it will
continue to function at a seasonal LOS orE without the proposed project and a seasonal LOS ofF
with the project. The report also contains recommended mitigation measures which are listed as
below.
."
....~
1. Construct appropriate site .frontage improvements in accordance with City code
requirements.
2. Construct site driveways per applicable engineering requirements.
3. If required by the City modify the existing E. 8th StreetlLincoln Street traffic control
signal to provide protective/permissive left turn phasing.
4. If requested by the City, recIwmeIize E. 8th Street between Lincoln Street and Laurel
Street to provide continuous left turn channelization.
WIth these mitigation measures, the report projects the intersection's seasonal LOS will remain at E
with the proposed project.
1
..(......
.
.
.
067
.
.
.
.
....,~
:g
;::-
PWmiD8 DepanmeDt SIaff Report
REZ 98-03 - Northwest Permit
July 8. 1998
Pase3
The City Engineer reviewed the traffic analysis and noted the report used a 5% traffic volume growth
factor while the City and the Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Orgarti7J1tion (RTPO) uses
a 2% factor in all projections and models for the City. Consequently, The City Engineer requested
an addendum to the report with revised information based on the 2<<>>A. growth factor and a review of
the project's potential impact on 9th Street, Laurel Street, and the 8th Street and 9th Street alley.
This addendum was rec:eiYed on June 3, 1998 and indicated the project would not have a significant
impact on these streets based'on the project's access on Lineoin Street and 8th Street with no access
permitted onto 9th Street. The City Engineer recommended a revision. of the report's mitigation
measures to eliminate the modification of the signal's left turn phasing in order to keep a higher leve'l
of protection for vehicles turning left. With the project subject to the revised mitigation measures,
the City Engineer states the average LOS for the 8th Street and Lincoln Street intersection will
remain at D in the year 2000 and-using the recalculated projections at the City's standard 2% growth
factor, the seasonal LOS will remain at E.
( .
Since this application is only for the rezoning of Lots 13, 14, IS, and 16 and not for the applicant's
overall development plan, upon which the traffic analysis was based, it is unlikely any commercial
development of these 4 lots alone would impact Lincoln Street or 8th Street to a greater degree than
that projected in the submitted traffic report. However, since the report's anticipated less than
significant impact on 9th Street and Laurel Street is based on the overall site's design with no access
onto 9th Street, development of the subject lots individually, would potentially inCrease traffic on 9th
Street.
Zomng Ordinance Review:
The purpose of the RS-7 and eSD zones are as follows:
BS::1- This is a low density residential zone intended to create and preserve urban
smgle family residential neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family
'homes on staildt:vd Townsite-size lots. Uses which are compatible .with and
functionally related to a singlefamily.residen!.ial environment may also be located
in. this zone. -.. .
CSD. - This is a commercial zone oriented primarily to those businesses serving the
immediate needs of the surrounding residential zones but is slightly less restrictive
than the eN zone and as such provides a transition area from the most restrictive
commercial zones to those of lesser restrictions.
The adjacent properties are zoned as follows:
To the north:
To the south:
To the east:
To the west:
CSD;
RS-7;
CSD; and
RS-7.
flh8
",."
"." ..!t/1."
~.,~~,
'.',"',::
PIaImiD8 DeparaDeDt Staft'Repon
REZ 98-03 - Northwest Permit
July 8. 1998
Paae4
.
Comprehensive Plan Review:
The subject property falls within the undesignated area between the Comprehensive Plan's
Commercial land use designation to the north and a Residential desigJ'Wion to the south. Please see
Attachment C which shows the subject area, the Comprehensive Plan's land use designations, and
. the Zoning Code's zo~g'designatio.ns.
In the interest of conciseness, only those policies found to be most relevant have been cited..
However. an policies have been taken into consideration.
I .
Land Use Element Policies
Goal A, Policy No. 1 - "The Comprehensive Plan Land use map should be used as a
conceptual guide for determining current and long range zoning and other land use
decisions. The map's land use designations are intended to show areas where general land
use types are allowed The area between land use designations should be considered an
imprecise margin in order to provide flexibility in determining the boundary of such areas.
When determining appropriate zoning designations for an area near a margin. the goals.
policies and objectives of the Land Use Element should take precedence. "
. Goal A, Policy No.2. - "AII land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council .
and/or D1V' of its appointed Commissions. Boards or Committees should be consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan and its land use map. "
Because the subject propeny is located in the undesignated area between two designated
areas, the City Council has the option of zoning the propeny consistent with either
designation. Which ever is chosen. a conclusion needs to be made that the zoning of the
subject property is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan' s Goals and Policies.
Goal D, Policy No. 1 - "The City should ~ .encourage new and existing commercial
developments and businesses which are consistent with the goals and policies' of this
Comprehensive Plan. "
The area of the proposed rezone is part of a larger development site which if developed as
proposed. will resuh in the displacement of an existing professional office building and a glass
repair business and building supply store. It is anticipated these businesses will relocate to
other locations, hopefully, within the City limits. They will be replaced on the development
site by a proposed retai1 business, which will move from its existing location further north on
Lincoln Street. That building will then be available for use in accordance with that site's CSD
zoning. If all of this occurs as proposed and with the required mitigation measures, the
rezoning of the subject area will result in an increase of economic activity.
Goal E, Policy No. 7 - "District shopping areas should be located at the intersections of
arterial streets of sufficient size to satisfy traffic demand and at the boundaries of
Ohq
.
.
.
.
:":;i,:"<;f,"o;' c""':..,:,<"~';"
~/;~~
i;::~:':;f):~-:_. .;.
.....
_\,~,
~:
, -'.,",!.
PWmiDg r>epanmeDt Sraff Repon
REZ 9~ - Nonhwest Permit
July 8. 1998
Pap!
neighborhoods so that more than one neighborhood may be served "
The City's Comprehensive Plan identifies 8th Street as a minor arterial street and Lincoln
Street as a principal arterial street. As part of the pl'oject's'environmental review, a traffic
analysis was prepared and the report's recommended mitigation measures as revised by the
City Engineer have been included as required mitigation m~ for the project's Mitigated
Determination of Non-Significance. As mitigated, the City engineer has indicated he is .
,"comfortable with the project and the proposed traffic mitigation measure,s as revised.""
I .
The proposed expansion of the CSD zoning is at a location where development of the
property can serve the residential neighborhoods to the east of Lincoln Street as well as the
neighborhood area to south and west of the property.
Public Comments:
Numerous written commentS and a petition opposing the proposed rezone were received during the
public comment period which was originally scheduled to end on February 27 but was extended to
March 6. The petition and comments are included in AttaChment D. The issues addressed include
increased traffic on 9th Street, potential aime, increased noise, lighting and the general impact of the
project on the Cheny Hill residential area, and the availability of alternative commercial properties.
Other Agency Comments:
Washinilon State ~artment of Trans po nation:
The Department of Transportation's comments are included as Attachment E. They address
the impact of the overall project on the Lincoln Street and 8th Street intersection, stormwater
issues. signage requirements, and a recommendation the development of site be accessed from
9th Street instead of Lincoln Street (SR 101).
Other Department Comments:
..,.p
.'
Public Works I)q)artment:
The Public Works Department's comments are attached as Attachment F. They consist of
the City Engineer's comments on the traffic report and his recommended revisions to the
traffic report's recommended mitigation measures. '
Fire Dc;>artment:
The Fire Department's comments are attached as Attachment G. While they have comments
related to other portions of the applicant's overall development proposal, they have no
objections to the proposed rezone.
f17n
PIaDDin8 DepanmeDt Staff Report
REZ 9~ - Northwest Permit
July 8. 1998
Page 6
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department recommends the Planning Co~on forw~d to the City Council a
. recommendation . for approval of rezone application REZ 9~3 as proposed, citing the fonowing
findings and conclusions.
Findings:
Based on the infonnation provided in the public record including the application. file. the staff report
and its attachments, comments received during the public comment period, and the Planning
Commission's deliberation, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds:
1. The applicant, Northwest Pennit submitted the application to the Planning
Department on February 9, 1998. A Determination of Completeness was issued on
February 12, 1998 and the public written comment period initially ran from February
12, 1998 to February 27, 1998. In response to public request, the public written
comment period was extended to March 6, 1998.
2.
The proposal is to rezone four lots (Lots 13, 14. 15 and 16 of Block 268 in the
Townsite of Port Angeles). approximately 28.000 square feet of property, from RS-7,
Residential Single Family to CSD, Commercial Shopping District (Attachment A to
the Planning Department StaffRepon for REZ 98-03 dated July 8, 1998).
3. The proposed rezone is pan of the applicant's overall proposal to develop 90,000 s.f
of the southwest comer of Lincoln Street and 8th Street (extending to 9th Street)
with ail approximately 17,000 s.f. retail store. The overall proposal includes this
rezOne request and a street vacation request for the eastern ponion of the 8th and 9th
Streets alley.
4. As part of the application's SEPA review, a traffic analysis was requested of the
applicant on February 13. 1998. .
S. On April 20. 1998, the Plaiming Department received a letter from the applicant
waiving the City's 120 day permit processing requirement due to the applicant's delay
in preparing the requested traffic analysis.
6. On May 14, 1998. the Planning Department received the requested traffic analysis and
on June 3, 1998, the Planning Department received an addendum to the analysis with
comments regarding 9th Street, Laurel Street, and the 8th and 9th Streets alley.
,'f
'Or
.
c. .
.
7. This application was originally scheduled for Planning Commission consideration on
March 11, 1998 at which time it continued due to the lack of a traffic repon and a .
SEP A determination to April 22, 1998. On April 22, 1998 it was again continued for
the same reason until JW1e 10, 1998 at which time it was continued until July 8, 1998
07t
.<1j~\
.
PlaDDiDI DepanmeDt SlaffReport
REZ 98-03 - Northwest Permit
July 8,1998
Pase7
to accommodate the MONS comment period.
8. The SEPA Responsible Official issued a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance
for the proposal on June 3,.1998 (Attacbm. B to the Pl8nning Department Staff
~;" . Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8, 1998). The MONS was mailed to all persons
.-vo ~e-:..,.l ~4;: ..' who submitted written comments related .to the applicant's environmental checklist
h ~; .4\ A"-9t . and the comment period for the MDNS ran until June 19, 199~.
~-7 .
9. On June 26, 1998, the City's SEPA Responsible Official re-issued the Mitigated
Detennination of Non-Significance with an additional mitigation measure requiring
certain development aspects of the project be subject to further review.
10. The public had an opportunity to comment on the proposal during the noticed written
comment period which ran from February 12 to March 6, 1998. All of the written
comments received during this time are included as Attachment D to the Planning
Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03.dated July 8, 1998. The issues addressed
include increased traffic on 9th Street, potential crime, increased noise and lighting
and the general impact Qf the project on the Cherry Hill residential area, and the
availability of alternative commercial properties.
.
. 11. The subject area is within the undesignated area between the Comprehensive Plan's
Commercial land use designation to the north and the Residential designation to the
south. It is currently zoned RS-7.
12. The subject area is level and is currently developed with two single-family residences
and an unimproved parking lot used by a business located on propeny to the north of
the rezone area. The adjacent properties are developed with the following~uses:
To the north:
To the south:
To the east:
To the west:
commerciil uses;
single family resi9~ces;
single family restdence; and
single family residences.
13. The adjacent properties are zoned as follows:
To the north:
To the south:
To the east:
To the west:
CSD;
RS-7;
CSD; and
RS-7.
.
14. The City's Compr~hensive.Plan identifies Lincoln Street as a principal arterial street
and 8th Street as a minor arterial street.
15.
The traffic analysis ~oted the 8th and Lincoln Street intersection currently functions
072
,;':~,
,.,,~
..'-~:$;
PlaDDiD8 DeparIIDeDt Staff'Report
REZ 9~ - N011bwest Permit
July 8. 1998
Pap 8
.
at an average level of service (LOS) D and project~ that..in the year 2000 it ,will
contimJe to function at an average LOS ofD with and without the proposed proJect.
16. ~e traffiC: analysis noted the 8th and LincolnStreet interseCtion currently functions
. at a seasonal level of service (LOS) E and projected that in the year 2000 it will
continue to function at a seasonal LOS ofE without the proposed project and.a
seasonal LOS ofF: with the project as proposed. The report 'projects the intersection
'will operate at a seasonalLOS ofE with the project if the project is subject to the'
rePort's mitigation measures.
17. The City Engineer reviewed the traffic analysis and recommended a revision of the
report's mitigation measures. WIth the project subject to the revised mitigation
measures, the City pngmeer states ~e average LOS for the 8th and Lincoln Streets
intersection~ remain at D in the year 2000 and the seasonal LOS will remain at E.
18. The Qep~~t of Transportation comments are included as Attachment E to the
Planning Dep&rtment Staff Report for REZ 98-03. dated July 8, 1998. They address
the impact of the overall project on the Lincoln Streetiand' 8th Street intersection,
stormwater issues, signage requirements, and a recOmmendation the proposed
development of the overall site be accessed from 9th Street instead of Lincoln Street .
(SR 101).
Conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the public record including the application file, the staff report
and its attachment, written cOmments received during the public cornrnent period~ the Planning
Commission's deliberation, andthe'above findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission
hereby concludes:
A. The fonowing Comprehensive Plan Poli~es are most relevant to the proposal, Land
Use Policies Al and A2, Cl. Dl, and E7.
B. If the property is developed as pan of the applicant's overall development plan as
described in Attachment A to the Plimning Department Staff Report}for REZ 98-03.
dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MDNS attached as
AttachmentB to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03. dated July 8,
1998, the rezone is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policies Aland A2, C 1, D 1,
and E7.' .
C.
If the property is d,eveloped as part of the applicant's overall development plan as
described in Attachnlent A to the Planning Department'St8frReport for REZ 98-03.
dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's reviSed MDNSattached as
Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03. dated July 8,
1998~ the rezone is in the public use and interest and:;is compatible with the
.
073
.
.
.
.' ';fJ;i;'
.~ ._.~.
"l....~
.,.:\~
July 8. 1998
Paae9
PIamIiD8 DepanmeIIt Staff'Report
RBZ 98-03 - Northwest Permit
surrounding zoning and land uses.
D. If the property is developed as part of the applicant's overall development plan as
descnbed in Attachment A to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03
dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MONS. attached as
Attachment B to the Planning Department StafrReport for REZ 98-03 dated July 8, .
1998, the reZone will result in an increase of ecOnomic activity in the City.
E. If the property is # developed as part of the applicant's over8ll development plan"
as descnbed in Attachment A to the Planning Department Staft"Report for REZ 98-03
dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MONS attached as
Attachment B to the ~~artment StafrReport for REZ 98-03 dated July 8,
1998, the rezone ~~f8ve a negative impact on adjacent residentially zoned and
developed properties along 9th Street. .
I .
F. If the property is not developed as part of the applicant's overall development plan
as described in Attachment A to the Planning Department Staft"Report for REZ 98-03
dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MONS attached as
Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8,
1998, the City should consider a rezone of the property back to RS-7.
This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council, which has final authority.
RU9IOl.PCI
~ G.'~ ~"~ ~ ~r~~a--.
.......#
074
'.' .-.;;fiI. '. ........
..'L.~:",
4 ~n'?"
.
I .
.
.
075
. -
(. r
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Rezone Application
ORI'GINAL"lqtt
.-
.
fORT ANG
PlANNING OEPAR!MENr
PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLE7JNG THIS FOR
1. (A) APPLICANT Northwest Permit -' Deborah Hart or Gerty Stewart Daytime Phone 206-374-0833
Address 2320 FilSt Avenue #250. ~ttle. W A .98121 Phone 206-374-0833 .
(B) PROPERTY OWNER (if other than applicant) 1be Baldrid8e Group - Allen Kann. .
Property Owner's Address (if other than applicant) 11906 Manchester Road #204, St Louis, MO 63131
Dayti.me Phone 314-966-2300
(C) APPLlCANrs REPRESENTATIVE If other than applicant or property owner As Per Applicant Above
Phone
I .
2. (A) Legal Description of Subject Property See An~hed
4I!t) General Location of Subject Property LUmia sa..load'.......... 8th ODd 9Ih S1l'eCl
3. Size of Subject Property 90.000 Total Site sq.ft. 1/2 blocks 2.06 Total Site acres.
4. Zomng of Subject Property (SO & RS7 Proposed Zoning Designation (SO.
5. Characteristics of Subject Property (how is it developed) The subject Site is made up of the Easterly 300
!eet of the North and South sides of the Block surrounded by E.~'1h S1.. S. Uncoln St. and E. 9th St. The Northerly ponioD
of the Site IS currenJy Zoned CSO,1hc Southerly ponion is Zoned RS7. There are 3 existing S~c Family Residences on
the Southerly pol'bon of our Site. The Nonbelry pOrtion of our Site a>>1IIains and Existing 27.000sJ. WarebouselOfflCC
budding
6. Characteristics of Surrounding Area (what uses are around the property) Comidcring our Entin:
proJcct OIS the .Subject Site-the surrounding Zoning is as foUows: Nonh: Commercial - East: Commercial
South Residential
West Front (Northerly) ponion: CSD I Rear (Southerly) ponion: RS7
. Comprehensive Plan Designation of Property CSO & RS7
076
CITY OF PORT ANGELES PllltI,,",,~. J11 Lut Fifth &rHl. P.O. Boz / ISO. Pon Allpln. WA NJ61 (J60) 4/741JO
A"ArW~Et--L\ A
r--
~
~,
.~
. RaDne Appliarion
... 2 on
. (
r
Comprehensive Plan Designation of Surrounding Properties Whole Site: N.E. W.NW :CSD~ SctSW:Rcs.
Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies The SUI1UIIIIdin2 Nothertv area is 2CDCraIh' Cominen:ia1 in natme.
Allowin2 thiS Site to be DI'Oocrtv assembled and to opcmte as a wlmle will add to the overall inunaJtC of the area.
10. JUSTIFICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
.
tI.
9.
(A) ,Relationship to Comprehensive Plan The Rczcmc Request meets the o~ective for the (XnoprebcDSivc plan, for
the area:
(B) Suitability of Property for Proposed Zoning When we a)nsidel'the Site as a wbole it 'is generally Surrounded
on J sides with a)mmcrcial zoning and existing uses. The area witbiD the block with the Single Family zoning does not
allow for well assembled planning or. developmclll of this ptOp;.lty.
(C) Change in Circumstances Since Original Zoning Commercial uses have a)ntinued to iDcrcase in the area
sunounding the subject property.
.
(D) Inappropriateness of Current Zoning The roCli~ site is split down the middle bv zoning classifica1ion. This
precludes any cohesive development plan for the propeR)'.
, 1. I CERTIFY that all of the above state~ents are true to the best of my knowledge and
acknowtedge that wilful misrepresentation of infonnation will immediately tenninate this
application.
---~4~
SiGNA~
/. 13. 9Y/
Date
l'
Fil- ~o. .RE: z. <"l~ ':0$
RbveivectZ - 9 - 9{f'
Heartng(s)\. 3 -/1 ~)l-- .y-;7 - 9?
.
077
^-"'
"f;"
',.--~F .
..::."'~" '.
<.o;ot.::;-
.
RITE AID DRUG STORE.
REZONE NARRATIVE'SHEET
January 13,1998
1.
Northwest Permit Inc. is the applicant on behalf of the future OWDers of the. property for this .
RezOne application. Along with this Rezone, we have requested a Street Vacation for an
alleyway that currently divides the property. The contacts in our office are Deborah Hart and
Gerty Stewart. The address for Northwest permit is 2320 First A venue, Suite 250, Seattle,
Washington 98121. The phone numbers for NWP are (206) 374-0833 and fax (206) 374-0834.
Our e-mail addressisPermi~w@aol.com. The current OWDer of this property is Mr. Robert
German. care of NW ReIai1 'Partners, Mr. Scott Grainger, 600 University Stnlet. Suite 3012,
Seattle, W A 98101, phone number (206) 343-9204.
2. <a) & (b)
The legal description, tax account numbers and addresses are attached to this document. as they
are quite lengthy.
.
3.
The total Site is 2.06 acres. or 90,000 square feet. The portion of the Site to be rezoned is
approximately 35,000 square feet. taking the requested alley vacation into consideration.
4,
. The total Site is rectangular in ~ and relatively flat. with a sloped area along East ~ S~
The portion to be rezoned faces 9 S1rCCt, and is contained by South Lincoln to the East. .and a
rcsidentral property to the West. There are three existing Single Family struc:turCs on the portion
of the property to be rezoned. and a commercial OfticelWarehouse building on the balance of the
Site facing East 811l Street. The alley for which we bave.Jc:qucstcd Vacation bisects these two uses
and our proposed Site heading East and West. ~.
s.
The surrounding properties are as follows when we consider our Site as a complete package:
Nonh, commercial; East.. commercial; South. residential; and West, for the "Front" (Northerly)
ponion of the Site, commercial. for the "Rear" (Southerly) portion. residential. The surrounding
area. especially along East 8* Street. is primarily commercial/retail in nature. South Laurel Street
adjoins this property approximately two hundred feet to the West. It appears that all of the streets
surrounding this project arc arterial in nature.
~
6.
. . The existing property is zoned CSD for the Northerly portion. and RS7 for the Southerly portion.
078
14.3
7.
The requested Zoning is to have OIU' entire Site zoned CSD.
8.
In talking with Sue Roberts of YOID' office. the specific Comprehensive Plan citations will be
added to this request at a later time.
9. .
All comprehensive plans carry an outline for citywide growth. The area in which this property is
located is mostly commercial in nature. The Rezone will allow a cohesive development of this
property, with a consistent Zoning for the entire Northeast 300 feet of this block. A commercial
development on this portion of this block will be in keeping with the uses and intent of the area.
This project will provide a clean, public-friendly area. with sidewalks and access from the
residential areas not only for this project, but also for the existing businesses in the area.
10.
Please note for this item, as well as for item one, a second copy of the Rezone request, signed by
the cmrent property owner, accompanies this application.
Y OlD' consideration of this request is appreciated. If you have any questions, please contact our
office.
NORTHWESTP
;,"'j.
':j
.~
.
.
.
079
A4
.
.
.
("
January 19, 1998
Mr. Scott Grainger
Northwest Retail PutnftS. Ltd.
600 Unh;ersity St., SUite- 3012
Seattle, W A 9810 I
Rc:: Rezone Application
Street Vacation Application
Lots 1-6 inclusive, Lots 13-16 inclusive
Block 268, Townsite of Pon Angeles, W A.
Dear Scott:
This letter shall serve as Owner's pennission to Boardwalk Development, its agents
and/or assigns to file the necessary Rezone Application, Street Vacation Application, and
other docwnentation as requested by the city of Port Angeles in association with the
proposed retail development occurriag at Lots 1-6 inclusive. Lots 13-16 inclusive
Block 268, Townsite of Port Angeles. WA.
Sincerely,
/JI~
Robert X. German
It 6 B- .
f .6~.~~) t WAr
q~J(. ~ .
..,,,,
.-
f ..,.
....~.~.'~,...
.~-::~~
;:-'{
I .
080
AS
(
,.......".;
'.",.~:~,~~ '
'",
.
Memornndwn .
To: Deborah Lynn Hart. N.W. Permit
From: Allen Kann. Boardwalk Development
Date: 01/27/98
( .
Re: Authori7.atian to Northwest Permit
This Memorandum is intended .as authorization to Northwest Permit to apply
and process permits on behalf of us for the property legally desaibed. as
follows:
Lots 17-18, Block 268, TOYKlsite of Port Angeles, WA
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me on 314-966-2300. Your .
assistance is appreciated.
Very Truly Yours,
BOARDWALK DEVELOPMENT
.l+~
Allen Kam
.'
.'
Executive Vice President
.
O~l
Ai,
.
.
.
'-21-1_ Ii.....
,':', ' '~~ .,.. '. , ,.",.
...... malL ,,~ .. sa.. ,
- (
...." 21. I'"
Mr. .....0.0.-
00 Mr. ... ~I -ll "J .
)IIM..AI.... ,. .. tIlL
.. tW....'" .... "12
. 11'11. WAtIlOI .
. '---
k, ,__~__
.... Vw -. j. ""'.11(.
LoCi .'.'1 '
IIack -. b.... ~ """L4It.. WI..
0. Bob:
1Nt a.r"'IaW.~' jIInIII..." ......DPIIus LtI........
.sf........... e ale......".. J II., ......~lnll...l.... VJl{v"a AfpU If ~ .-
....... ~ - -.. ~.,.... afPaIt..&~~.iII"'" wlda..
ptOpOII4......~ lI{r" mr ~4" LeelI"T.11. Block _ r......,r.t
~'..~ WA. .
Ifn~...
J( ...".",. t3
x.tln~'-CII
~~
..... .......411
........ ..---c.~
....
.'
i.
'.
~.2
...:....................
:':it\:'~,
<:', ,';
082
A7
, ,
.
'I
SEVENTH ST.
GEODEllC GEoo
MONUMENT MOtU
NO. G12-371 EIGHTH . ST. NO. I
- !-' .~Z& ." ~
,
...= ...= ....= '.-: ,..: ,..:
en en' Vl 'en ~ Vl en
NIN.TH ST.
lLJ >- >- ~ -,' 3 lLJ
0::
Z lLJ 0:: a:: . " Vl
0::' :j 0 c(
l.LJ ..: ::::> 0 J:
~ J: :s z
u Vl :J 0
~ TENTH ST.
et:
0
VICINIT.Y MAP
NO SCALE,
J>
cP
o
00
w
'.
.
1.,1
EllC
MENT
12-2-1
-..
I
l
~f.
)
'.Z;
.,';'
.
" '. "J; ~;^~:;LY:
"',~
I
".l~ N"II7.N"1"; U
---~--------tr al
f 1
;'~~ ,t~
.
1--------:=---------1
I I
I
" ,
: 'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
fl
,I
I
t
~
i
I ! 1
I ~
I I
.; lil
!u
~
,~
-
I
-
!
I
I
I
II
I:
.. ..,
~
c!)
---
1:1 ~
, 1 () ,
I, "I '
1'---"4
"\ .' ~
I. ~Lr--'
1 i II. -:- III
I ... t' ~_-1
: i-l{ - II
I :!I I: r - i-t
: II ~ L,:
I L_.r .
\ ----
I
.
--L _ __
4
~.
I- i
.- . :
---
'..-
SIMIalnil 'J.~OC;
.... ......
---
""
,r-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ii
.'
I
I\-
I
"
I. . -
I!
I:
I
\ \
,
I
II
':"''1'~:'
..-..-...... .'.'
. '.~'.,:~\
I~! ~~
.~" i'
Isle. ,.s I
lilt I ,,-I
~Ii~ " ,-I"
'"'' "
hi ! J~!
II! ~ _KU
~ .1'iB~I~ !13~
~ Ii .K.II". '
1~;linbli
t
.
.
z
4: .
-!~
a.. I
~ t .
\OJ
A., ,
:;
. en
a:
""
c:
.- ~.
f: it
~; i~
~;;I ia
=", t! !~
~:a . ~
084
/1S:9
<c~
..';-;;:.,.
lfi) IE @ lEU W rElii1
lB1 !4AY r H91 J~
.
PORTAHGElfS
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
PORT ANGELES RITE AID DRUGSTORE #5257
-TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
( .
Prepared for
..
RITE AID CORPORATION
c/o MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP
112 Fifth Ave. N.
Seattle, WA 98109
Prepared by
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
2101 -1121h Ave. N.E., Suite 110
Bellevue, Washington 98004
Telephone - (425) 455-5320
FAX - (425) 453-7180
.
May 7, 1998
'EXPIRES .", 0 0
.
085
Co~L6E REPoa:lW('\K ~\...L
n~\..~ A~ "\\~C.\~f-4\EMt>
is. L.oc."'TE~ 'H ~~'C~ FlLlS .
~..">'d'
".;"~2;
.,:~_..
~
1~
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
..'101 . : ;211) :."Em..~ ',E ~UITE "0 .- 6ELLEvUE ;;.l!ittIUGTON tICIO.&
fELEPHOUE I.UI "!I!1.!l320
;:ACSI..IILE ,.UI "!I3.711O
,.. ,. C ..."1" tot ,...."...v...
11 L"Ut." "'I \...~. ...._..,....
~ May 7, 1998
Mr. Kent Heasley .
RITE AID CORPORATION
c/o t\1r. John T rieger
MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP
112 Fifth Ave. N.
Seattle. WA 98109
( .
..
Re: Port Angeles Rite Aid Drugstore #5257
Traffic Imoact AnalysIs
Dear Mr. Heasley:
We are pleased to submit this traffic Impact analysis for the proposed Port
.ngeles Rite Aid Drugstore #5257 project. The project consists of a 16,750 sq. ft.
rugstore bUilding with drive-up service and is loca,ted at 120 East 8th St. in the City of
Port Angeles.
We have vIsited the project site and surrounding street network. The work
Included In thiS report is based on our telephone conversation with Gary Kenworthy.
?E.. City Engineer of the City of Port Angeles. The City of Pon Angeles Transportation
Services ana FacIlities Plan, October 1996. prepared by Entranco Engineers was
;JrovlOed b~' the Cltv We have reviewed thiS City document ana have utilized data from
thiS repon wnere appropriate.
.'
The conclUSions and recommendations begl~ on page 9.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Figure ~ IS a VICInity map showing the location of the proposed siteand the
surrounding street network.
Figure 2 shows a preliminary site plan prepared by Mulvanny Partnership plotted
j'J1arch 6,1998 The plan consists of a 16.750 square footdnigstorebuilding with drive-
up service ano 69 parKing stalls including three handicap stalls. Access to the proJect is
.proposed via two driveways and an eXisting alley. One of the driveways is onto S.
...Incoln 5l. anc ~~e other IS on E. 8th Street. The allev accesses S. Laurel 5t. to the
'Nest of the suolect site. '
~':!e(i2~8 0 8 6
A \ \
'<.~.'" ifit. . '.'
> l.~~~i
,,,,,.'
{r~
.
~.-1r Kent Heasley
RITE AID CORPORATION
fvtay 7, 1998
Page -'2-
Full development of the 16,750 sq. tL Port Angeles Rite Aid Drugstore #5257
project is expected to ,occur later this year. However, we have used 2000 as the
horizon year for the purposes of this study. .
I .
EXISTING PHYSICAL CONDITIONS
The project site is presently develCiJped. The development consists of three
single family dwelling units and two commercial buildings. The smaller bUilding,
containing Mail Box Etc., will remain. The larger building will be removed to make way
for the subject development.
S trEE! t= aCllitles
Figure 3 shows eXisting traffic control. number of street lanes, number of
aoproach lanes at intersections, and other pertinent information. The primary streets
ana the City's classification within the study area are as follows:
Lincoln 51. (SR 101)
E. 8th Street
E. 9th Street
Laurel Street
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Local Access
Local Access
.
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
'0;;'': .'Olurnes
~ Igure 4 shows the existing turning moveme'nt traffic volumes at the Lincoln
SuE. 8th 51. Intersection. The intersection traffic volumes were counted by Trafficount
on Thursoay. Apn116. 1998. The Port Angeles area incurs significant seasonal
fluctuation In traffic volumes due to substantial tourist traffic. Therefore. the collected
oata '/las adjusted to reflect seasonal peak conditions.
The seasonal data contained in the Annual Traffic Report, 1996 'was used.
Accorolng to the attached data for permanent count station number;69.the count
::onaucted on April 16, 1998, is very close to the average peak condition. ThIs average
:onOltlon was adjusted to a seasonal peak. August. condition by factonng the approach
.olumes up by 22.9% (1 .,. 0.98 April. -0.83 August\.
.
. .. 'l:UJ~:J:: 1<11'
087
"\<-.
....~.i'~
."Y_~
>">:.~,
"
.
Mr. Kent Heasley
RITE AID CORPORATION
May 7,1998
Page - 3 -
1r~
F!gure 4 also shoY.'S the eXisting average daily traffic volume on Lincoln St. south
ot E. 8"1 Street. This volume was obtained from the Annual Traffic Report.
Level of Service Analysis
Level of service (LOS) is a qualitativ,~ measure describing operational conditions
Within a traffic flow. and the perception of these conditions by drivers or passengers.
These conditions include factors such as speed. delay, travel time. freedom to
maneuver, traffic interruptions. comfort. convenience, and safety. Levels of service are
given letter designations. from A to F. with LOS A representing the best operating
.:ondltlons (free flow. little delay) and LOS Fr the worst (congestion. long delays l.
Cjenerally. LOS A and B are nigh, LOS C and D are moderate. ana LOS E and Fare
:ow.
Table 1 shows calculated levels of service (LOS) for existing and seasonal peak
<<onditionsat the pertinent street intersections. The LOS were calculated uSing the.
rocedures In the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual - SpecIal
Report 209 3rd Edition updated 1994. The LOS shown indicates overall intersection
operation. At Intersections. LOS is determined by the calculated average delay per
vehicle. The LOS and correspor.\ding average delay in seconds are as follows:
! TYPE OF I A I B C 0 I E I F-
I
I INTERSECTION I
I
I I
'I Signalized <5.0 >5.0 and >, 5.0 and.. >25.0 and >40.0 and 1>60.0
<15.0 <25.0 .... <40.0 <60.0
.1
- --
.; Stop Sign Control <5.0 >5 and ~-'O and >20 and >30 and.. >45
I' - <: 20 I
.1 <10 < 30 < 45
..
-
The intersection LOS is an average for every vehicle entering the Intersection.
On occasion specific movements. such as stop sign controlled left turn 'movements.
exoenence significantly worse LOS than other movements at the Intersection. 'Nhen
:hlS IS the case other factors sucn as safety can be considered when determining
. whether Improvements are warranted.
. "tlfJ~'!JlI HIll 0 8 8
A\~
Mr. Kent Heasley
RITE AID CORPORATION
May 7 1998
Page - ~ -
f~>>~'
1r~ .
Acciaent History
. The City of Port Angeles provided an accide"nt listing .for the S ~ Lincoln SUE. 8th
St. intersection. This listing identifies recorded accidents from March 14, 1986 through I'
February 13.1998. The data "shows 102 recorded accidents at the analysis .
Intersection. S. Lincoln St./E. 8th S1. in twelve year time period reviewed. The
Transoortation Service and Facilities Plan identifies an accident rate of one at the
analysIs Intersection.
The 1996 Washington State Highway Accident Report identifies average
aCC:CEnt rates (per million vehicle miles of travel) on functional classified streets as
follo'::s'
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector
2.97
3.44
4.27
.
" The above rates are for urban arterials. A direct comparison of the intersection
acclaent rate statewide rate is not relevant because the rates do not measure Jhe same
thing The 1996 Washington State Highway Accident Report does not contain data on
average accident rates. per million entering vehicles. at intersections. However. based
on our experience. an accident rate of less than one is genE!rally considered to Indicate
that an Intersection IS operating satisfactorily, one to two is typical. and over two.
reaUlres iunher review" .
The calculated accident rate at the analys~~ intersection "IS one. which IS tYPical.
SR ' '), Access Classification
The access classification of SR 101 in the vicinity of the project site IS class four.
These highways have the capacity for moderate travel speeds and moderate traffic
VOlumes tor medium and short travel distances providing for intercity,'lntraclty. and
Inter-community travel needs. There IS a reasonable balance between direct access'
ana mobility needs for highways in this class. This class is to be used pnmarily where
the eXisting level of development of the adjoining land is more intensive and where the
prooaollltv of malor land use changes IS less probable than on class three highway
segments Highways In this class are tYPically distinguished by eXisting or planned
.
;llB029B RDt 0 8 9
A\L\
');\;/ ;_, "'.':~\{t:":,,,;, >~ -.; :::;L'l
0' .0
",,;.,..
-':~:. " .....
"i:~:~~:,- _
~~ .
1~~
.r. Kent Heasley
RITE AID CORPORATION
May 7.1998
Page - 5-
:
nonrestrictive medians. Restrictive medians may be used as operational conditions
warrant to mitigate turning. weaving, and crossing conflicts. Minimum connection
s'pacing standards should be applied if adjoining properties are redeveloped.
No more than one access shall be provided to an individual parcel or to
contIguous parcels under the same ownership unless it can be shown that additional
access points would not adversely affect, trle desired function of the state highway In
accordance with the assigned. access classification. and would not adversely affect the
safety or operation of the state highway. Spacing to another public or private access
connection shall be two hundred and fifty feet.
The proposed project access is via relocatIng the existing alley access on SR
101 No new access locations are proposed. Neither the existing alley access nor the
new driveway meets the recommended spacing criteria. However. the new onveway
location does meet the spacing criteria from the more critical E. eU' 51. intersection.
.East gin S,t. IS a low volume local access street thus the 250 ft. spacing should not be
necessary.
FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT
Figure 5 shows projected 2000 PM peak hour traffic volumes without the proJect.
These volumes Include the existing traffic volume counts plus background growth. The
Transoonatlon ServIces and Facilities Plan identifies household growth of about 1 % per
year In the Pon Angeles area. This same report also identifies a 20 year traffic growth
01 d' ~'o T n1S 6' % growtn translates to arouno 3% per year. :iowever. to be
conservative. we have applied a 5% per year gro~.th to the background traffic vOlu,!,e.
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS-
The Transportation Services and Facilities Plan identifies that there are two new
street facilities proposed in the comprehensive plan that would improve traffic
operations at the analysIs intersection. These facilities are as follows:
White Creek Crossing is a two-to three-lane extension of Lauridsen
Boulevard eastward from Ennis Street to Golf Course Road. which would
reqUIre a bridge structure over White Creek. The new facility is intended
.
.;....!lO~9B Rot
090
A\5
~
~,.;"..
--'1~
Mr. Kent Heasley
RITE AID CORPORATION
May 7. 1998
Page -6-
frt .
.
to attract westboulmd vehicles from SR 101 at Golf Course Road and
eastbound vehicles from SR 101 at Lincoln Stree,t.
'. Heart of the Hills Parkway will consist of both a newfacility and an
upgrade of existing facilities: Th~ new corridor would be a two-lane facility
'beginning outside the 'eastern' Port Angeles UGA. and would extend
southwesterly from SR 101 to Deer Park Road. From Deer Park Road.
the new facility would generally continue in a westerly direction to Race
Street. in the vicinity of the Mount Angeles Road/Heart of the Hills
Parkway intersection. At this point, the 'corridor would be upgraded on
Race Street to City design standards north to Lauridsen Boulevard.
I .
In addition to the street improvements identified in the comprehenSive plan a
~osslble Transportation System Management (TSM) strategy is discussed in the
Transportation Services and Facilities Plan. TSM strategies improve traffic operations
:JY more effective use of the existing street infrastructure.
A TSM strategy that has been suggested for the SR 101 corridor
through the City is to convert Lincoln Street (which already serves as a
portion of SR 101) and Peabody Street to a one-way couplet, which would
operate exactly like the Front Street and First Street couplet. In this
alternative. Lincoln Street would operate as a three-lane one-way facility
southbound. while Peabody Street would operate as a three-lane one-way
facility northbound. The couplet would join the existing one-way couplet
:.! ,cront Street ana FilSl Street oll1/)e nonh. ~Vll/) me lwo-way Launosen-
Boulevard on the south.
.
.'
.'
TRIP GENERA TION AND DISTRIBUTION
-
A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either
ltle ongln or destination (exiting or entenng) inside the study site. These trip generation
:alues account for all site tnps made by all vehicles for all purposes. including
::ommuter. visitor. recreation. and service and delivery vehicle- trips.
Table 2 shows the vehicular trips during an average weekday and during the AM
~na PM street traffic peak hours for the proposed 16.750 SQ. ft. Rite Aid Drugstore
::rOlect. The trip generation IS calculated using the average trip rates In the Institute of
.
"U:JlJ':.I::1 "Ill 0 9.1
A \(P
.
Mr. Kent Heasley
RITE AID CORPORATION
May 7,1998
Page - 7 -
OJ
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation. Sixth Edition. 1997 for
Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive.;.through Window (ITE Land Use Code 881). 0
A pass~by trip is an eXisting trip that comes directly from the traffic flow on 'a road
adJacent to the project site and does not require a diversion for another roadway.
According to Table VII-1 of Trip Generatio~ Fifth Edition, 1991, a pass-b~ rat~ for
discount store (K-Mart #14 on list) is identified at 50%. In addition, an article titled
Refinement of Procedures Used for Estimating Pass-by Trip Percentages by Massoum
Moussavl and Michael Gorman published by the ITE Journal, May, 1992, shows pass-
by percentages averaging 50% for five discount stores. Rite Aid stores are discount
orlentea and are expected to have similar trip maKing. characteristics to discount stores.
No reauCtlon for diverted linked tnps nor existing trips. due to the existing development.
were taken. Therefore, our analysis is conservative.
Figure 6 shows the calculated site-generated traffic and assumr;d distribution.
.he distribution is based on the characteristics of the road network. eXisting traffic
volume patterns, and the location of likely trip origins and destinations (employment,
shopping. social and recreational opportunities).
FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT
Traffic Volumes
-: '9ure 7 shows the proJected 2000 PM peak hour and average daily :"affic
VOlumes with the proposed proJect. The site-generated PM peak hour tranlc volumes.
snown on Figure 6 were added to the projected background traffic volumes shown on
FIgure 5 to obtain the Figure 7 volumes.
Level of Service
Table 1 shows calculated LOS for future with and without project conditions at
the pemnent street intersection. According to our LOS analysis the development of the
Rite Aid Drugstore project will not significantly affect the LOS operation of the analysis
Intersection under typical operating conditions. Under average peak condition the
JOer3t10n of the intersection meets the City's recommended LOS'O'crltena..
.
..,IBU29tj R",
1~~
I .
U92
A\7
.k Kent Heasley
RITE AID CORPORATION
May 7. 1998
Page - 8 -
During seasonal peak conditions the intersections congested with or without the
project. The City's Transportation Services and Facilities Plan describes the two
comprehensive plan projects that would improve the operating conditions of the
analysIs intersection. Additionally the TSM strategy of a one way couplet would
enhance operation of the Lincoln 51. corridor.
Channelization
.
The existing street'channelization on both E. 81n 51. and Lincoln 51. were field
reViewed. East 8111.S1. has around 50 ft. of paved surface curb to curb. This 50 ft. is
similar to Lincoln St. north of E. 81n Street. Lincoln 51. north of E. 8111 51. provides
:::onunuous left turn channelization and parking on both sides. We believe that
provldrng similar left turn channelization on E. 8'" 51. west of Lincoln St. would be
appropriate.
The Lincoln St. street Width south of E. 81n St. vanes from 47 to 42 feet. The
traffic volume on this street segment is substantially less than the volume using E. 8111
3l. west of Lincoln Street. Therefore, continuous left turn channelization IS not needed
at thiS time. Providing continuous left turn channelization would impact existing street
parking.
. ;:: uture Channelization Considerations
-
. Both E. 811'I St. and Lincoln 51. have adequate street widths to allow operational
_ :-::-.z.:-..:cmer:lts If desired by the City. Providing these capacity Improvements would
reQUire cnanges to the eXisting on street parking. Parking restrictions dUring peak
travel times IS a fairly common treatment. No changes to the existing on street parking
are recommended In conjunction with subject development project.
SEPA MITlGA TION
,..
The development of the subject project is calculated to cause a degradation of
the operation of the E. 8uI St./Lincoln S1. intersection during the seasonal peak penod.
No degradation dunng average peak condition is antiCipated. The intersection
operation could be enhanced via changing the existing Signal phasing.
1-;: I_~'~ HL~
fr~
...;~
..,~~
.'...
.
I .
.
.
093
A\6
",~~" ".~;e:r:,,~.r(,::'1A~~r
:_!_ ~\::::0:;,;?2'~t:t:.;i:('~Slt~:rr,;;-
.. Kent Heasley
RITE AID CORPORATION
May 7. 1998
Page - 9 -
'" The Improvement we recommend is revising the leftturn signal phasing to
protective/permissive phasing. This change would require the Installation of new Signal
heads and other attendant changes to the signal controller. With protective/permissive
the intersection operation would be significantly improved.
. . .
Channelization changes 'on E. alII 5L. are recommended to better accommodate
site generated left turn traffic (primarily the westbound to southbound customers during
the seasonal peak period). With left turn channelization and the protective/permissive
left turn phasing discussed above these customers would be able to clear the
westbound traffic stream.
SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDA TIONS
This repon uses eXisting traffic data collected at the penanent street intersection
and roads loentified for analysis. Level of service analyses w~re performed for eXisting
and projected future traffic volumes. usang the collected traffic data. for the without
"'oJect condition. The evaluation of the traffic impact of the proposed project. included
~ddlng project generated traffic to the future traffic volume prOjection and calculating
the level of serv"lce. The with project traffic operations were then compared to the
without project operations. The comparison of traffic operations with and without the
proJect Identifieo that the project will not cause a significant adv,erse affect on the
operation OT any of the study intersections.
Baseo on our analysis the Port "Angeles Rite Aid Drugstore #5257 project should
::e .:;;:~::;vec .....nh the follOWing traffic mitigation measure~: "
Construct appropriate site frontage improvements In accordance with City
code requirements.
2. Construct site driveways pe-r applicable engineering requirements.
3. If required by the City modify the existing E. alii 51.1Lincoln 51. traffic
control signal to provide protective/permissive left turn phasing.
4 If requested by the City. rechannelize E. 8"151. between Lincoln Sl. ana
Laurel 51. to orovlde continuous left turn channelization.
.
;" /::.":,,:1 "'OJI
"-~'.""'"
',:',;i,:~
" ."~~
"~":l>
1~~
v
094
A19
i...1r. Kent Heasley
RITE AID CORPORATION
~Jay 7. 1998
Page - 10-
If you have any questions please call me.
Very truly yours.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
" & ENGINEERING. INC.
){
,J'. {,~. ~ .<<;J
Mark J."Jacobs. P.E.
Senior Transportation Engineer
'.iJJ:es
..
.'
"',"',1',"
.'.?-'>'
'::::::. .
.~~~.
{~~.
c c. .
.
095.
1'080298 RDt
A~O
"-'".f'>c'C" c.c
. _,t'-;~':,,_:: .
~ .~".
(
('
ef~~
TRANSPORTATION PLAIIING . IIIINEIRIIG, INC.
Y'CTClI H. lllMO'" r .....-
OAVlP" '_11."',1."__
June 3,1998
2101 . u. MNUE N.E..1U11E no - HUEVUE, WASlIINlJTON lIIDlM
TELEPHONE .&161 '16.020
FAC.WILf '.~I dJ.J11l1
. Gary Kenworthy, P.E., City Engineer
CITY OF. PORT ANGELES
321 East FIfth Street,
'Port Angeles, 'NA 98362"()217. .
Re: Port Angeles Rite IUd Drugstore
Nelghbomood Impact
Dear Mr. Kenworthy:
In acccrdance with your request we have reviewed the potential traffic impact on
Laurel St., E. 51. S.E. and the alley between Laurel and Uncoln Streets due to the
subject development
ill
JJ4.- 3 ~
m,
I
m~mO\Ylm
F~O ClJf't..
f'~::1 "~:~F: ~::
PlANNI~\1 Df.~-:~"! ~:l
- I
.
The primary access to the Rite Aid development is onto E. 8" St. and Lincoln
Street, both arterial streets. An existing alley that Intersects with Laurel Street to the
east also provides access to the site. Our Port Anaeles Rite Aid Drugstore #5257 Traffic
Imead Analvsls dated May 7, 1998 identified that during the PM peak period two
vehicular trips would utilize the alley. Refn. Figure 6. May 7, 1998 traffic study. Note the
traffic volumes chown at the E. g" StJUncoln S1. intersection are for the cite driveway
intersection with Uncaln St. not E. 9" Street.
Locatlng the primary site driveways onto arterialltreeta directs aite-generated
traffic away frem the residential streets: Some al18 generated customer trafflc will
invanably use S. Laurel Sl'and E. gtt' Sl to and from the subject development These
customers would be reSidents 11vln; tn the reslaentlal areas to the southwest of the
development. A core shopping area is located oft of Uncoln St. to the north d the
sub,e.ct developmenl Therefore the streets utiliZed for shopping ortented trips by these
residents would not be signfficantly a~eded with development of the RIte Aid Drugstore.
In summary, the Rite Aid Drugstore project traffic impact on S. Laurel St., E. g"-
Sl and the alloy is anticipated to be minimal. PrirMry access to the site Is onto Lincoln .
St. and E. e" St.. both arterial streets. Customer traffic from the residential area to the
southwest of the development are naUlkety to slgnlficanUy change the streets they utilize
on shoppFig oiented trips. '
. MJJ:es
Very truly yours,
..... .," ()
cc: Kent Healey, RIte AId CorporatIon
Jehn Trieger, MUIvaMY Pannerlhip
096
POI028eMr.dOC
A~'
""'."~"'."
^:"t{iJt5,
'.~~,
.
I .
.
. "
....
.
097
NO: 800
Reissued 6126198
i/:~
'>:~!f1l
.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
.MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE
RCW Chapter 197-11-340
This MDNS is reissued and amended following the required J 5-day review period. The amendment
is the addition of mitigation condition #7.
Description of Proposal: A proposal to develop approximately 2.06 acres including a rezone of
a port~on of the property cUlTCIltly designated RS-7, Residential Single Family, to CSD;Community
. Shopping District, and development of an approximately 16,750 square foot retail building including.
demolition of an existing 27,000 square foot warehouse/office building and three sin~le family
residences.
I .
APPLICANT:
NORTHWEST PERMIT "
Location of Proposal (including street address, if any): Lots 1- 6 and 13-18 Block 268, Townsite
of Port Angeles, Washington. The project is generally located between Lincoln Street and Laurel
Street, and between Eighth and Ninth Streets. .
Lead Agency: CITY OF PORT ANGELES
.
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required lplder RCW
43.21 C.030(2)( c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and
other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
[XX) There is no comment petiod for this reissued MDNS.
J unc.26. 1998
Date
There is no comment period.
p~~~~ .
pavid Sawyer, Acting arming Director
ThIS DNSis issued per WAC 197-11-355.
You may appeal tillS determination to the Port Angeles City Council through the Planning Department. 321 East Fifth
Street. Pon Angeles. W A 98362, by submitting such wnnen appeal to the Planning Department no later than July.l1.
1998 You should be prepared to make specific factual obJections. Responsible Official: Brad Colhns, PlaMing
Director. Pon Angeles Planning Depanment. 321 East Firul Street. Port Angeles, WA 98362, phone (360) 417 - 4750.
.MI1~on Measures.
I . CommefClill traffic shall not access the project slIe from Ninth Street
2 Conslruct i1ppropnate site frontage Improvements an i1ccordance with City code requirements.
.
3
ConSlrUCI slIe dnveways per applicable engineenng requirements.
098
4
Rcchannc:lize EIsI Eighth Street between Lincoln Street and Laurel Street to provide continuous left turn channelization.
5 Thc developer shall upgrade the EighthlLin.:oln signal to providelwo additional Opticom channels to fully protect
emergency vehicle movement through the interscciion. . .
ATI~ r \-\ M EJ1T '\S
6 The developer shall c:onttibute S I 0,000 for future traffic volume(afcty ......,ovemcnts on EiPth udlor Lincoln Streets
in the project area.
(Added:)
7. Design, landscaping. and other site features such as fencing and screening shall be subject to SEP A review at the time of
a building/site development application.
I'
_,
Pub:
MaiVPost:
cc: Dept. ofTransponation
Pearson
Sclunid
Bailey
Gellein
Foley
VanSickle
T:\I'LANNINO\SEPA\MDNS\800
';~I'
'..,~
.
I .
.
099 .
~"')
.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
.
.
.eSD
100
A\rACHM'Et'JT C.
. ~I"
. :".~..~-. -.' -
~.~;.~. .
~->.
e
I .
.... .
'1
CSD
CN
RS7
NO HATCHING
101
CITY Of PORT ANGELES
PUBUC WORI<S
~
SCALE
100
I I
50
AREA MAP
REZONE FROM RS7 TO CSD (REZ 98-02)
LOTS 13-16 BL. 268 C ~
; -'~;'),",,,', .:: :'-,,:,,;"
'.t''-''\;
.;:
.
. Petition
:
. ,,;.:dtI
..~.<,.~
~
rDJrE Ie II n' ~:' '
l1iJ, ,. - 6 I9fJJ
I
....... ..
i-.. P~.~:,.~ .;:: <.,..
Ilwe the undersigned oppose the rezonin~ applicatioO f'tIorthwest Permit -REz-9~02, for
Lots 13 t~rough ~6, B~ 268, TPA generally described as the southwest comer of 8th
and .Lince.ln.Streets, Port Angeles, Washington: .
~lcm:lture .-
. ,'/ ~ /'
" >- /1.
~~(g ~. ,ZJ/LI./)vV
--- .)
.~ /'" ,2
, ,~7 . ~
'- ,. ~ ...~ ~
~0
' ,~~~~
p7. h .
Printed Name
L ,Il:; ~. f) UJI N ' ,
'~M . -:;e 'CI(
~_ (\ ("o..~o r
Address
(
q / ~ ,)n. M ,)-6-
~Sc:l-!:>- j,{{.? 7/C~S7:'
.
~S.~~ l~~~~ l(Y'''''';''t
\ ,~
- -:(0 /1) "/\0./ )/"., h] II ,,,,,'01'
.:;:~~72;{~ - 0c-US- l2.LV(Ch
'L; }!~.{:-r. Yt{.(4JlijJ;iT(t. WJ millf m"f r4 f1.!us,1l1 / fir Ii) '77 A-
. I / /.
_I,. : J) " J/~ lA.!,
J" rtb.- 'lA { ",-' oj: u.ck · ~ k 0.. t_ -h ""'1' 11 ( V. i.. -h 'S
NCJ .' ~ 5,' /1.S,;
N S'L~L~
/730
"FH-:
-
lZS, J"!> .
It ~ ~)p{ 7 1'-
i 10 4./ 7"Jl..
-
\1 J~ (\ ~(I,')
,'-
-,./!,...,..~{ /
-rot (t'~5
c. ' ".
{((tIL( .
?
/ .' 1
. 6 H.J.u
.
. "
.; A ./ t? .
/- .~ .....
~
~
1~
ST
.-
l ?>lc \J. 7-t~
lIS l-' 7K
.'
;: I'?, uJ . 7~"'
>?,1 ~ Jlv.4.~ ~.
'Ii 7 St.
102
I _ . _.,... ^ i::" .. \""\ ~
. .
,ij!E Ie IE n " Wjt
I1IJ I. - 6 all I :.:.
PORT ANGELE J
PlANtllNG DEPARTMEf.rr
llwe the undersignedlllRPose the rezoning application Northwest Permit REZ 98-02, for
Lots 13 through 16, Block 268, TPA generally described as the southwest comer of 8th
and Lincoln Streets, Port Angeles, Washington: .
,.">,,,,~
">""">1t
. Petition
-4
.
ddress ( .
. J;,ta h %3
""\ ~l_\ --
-: ~ . \JJ \ ~-(W, ei .....j r
--.- ('
~ -
/VI-'9~J'.. v' ~.J:r/1rfoN'
0/ ;.?;2. ,E. '7.ztL
.
.'
.....
103
.
l"->'")
, ':;.::,'\n]..,,<B-,..',,""'"
~lfllEn'm .
I :1.
]..- 61!l911 I~!
PORT AfiGElES i
P1._N~ING DEPARWr~'T
l/we the undersigned oppose the rezoning application.-MSrthwest Permit REZ 98-02, r
lots'13throtJgh 16, Block 268, TPA generally described as the southwest comer of 8th
and Lincoln Streets. Port Angeles, Washington: .
':"'~
~"~r:qt
.
.. p,tition
. Sianat ' " "Printed Name . ,
\, l.l \ tiL n -!) lit d~Ur
" A" (' :J ':'
(~ Ie; \>" "}x . II (r;? Lo.bC\ o(~/..(
. ). \' _ c' .- --' :. I J
~ \ \"\\'~ ,(. .~ "-~ )\'\A~~"-' \ hJ:\ ~5I-'... ~ c\\ ~v..\~'\~ ,-
~ _ ~i
'\ /"L ~
/"')
c ler.it..:
AdC!r~ . ( ,
//7 w~r~~."
/;4 L(c~'( c; {/I ,
II, ~~ Lf t ~ '
\ 1\1 \ ~ ,f'(-.j--f q-k
I.' J
.....
-, ;' ~I/~,
I',' c.~," 7 '
I.., l c, 1:/- (' ~
~ '-' -
I . . I t
..... {I. ,,'. ., '- 'kl', ( c:
L l. I l t '" 1,( ~ , r I, :
::J.. 'J4 U 14 1-
0'
0'
.
~
104
1)~
.,.'...;'..;..,......
',"', ~::: ",..
..,,;,,...
":'":;..;:.;-~
rulrll II' 1m ...
111l MAR - 6 I99J ".; i: .
1-; i
p.-., '..... ----.JJ '
l/we the undersigned oppose the'rezoning application Northwest PemltfR~:.9t.D2. .fQr:
Lots 13 through 16, Block 268, TPA generally described as the southwest comer of 8th
. and Lincoln Str~ts, Port. Angeles, Washington:
.' Petition
Sianature
,-. r ,.' \
p {' ~ Ho1t4-
~dJr~
.' '- ) v\.."'- -~
Printed Name
Address I .
~~
4.14J ~-
, d=?S F '1~5i ·
2~3~y-P/E- .
.
H. L J( In ~
"( v r( ~. l. '1;r I ",4. ·
~
-
I .
LlrJDP\ ~USr+
2.2 q~ ·
12u" CYCU~ )M. bl-. .
~ c,9tt, -Jl~ ·
;; JJ; --If\.,
'2.\q W 0(#\ St - ·
() "uti rn 453C111uW:-
~~
,.
11
JuJlt. HU1-Unw,L
...
I {.J:':'
PJJ
37 ~
~rJ ~ F 7 ,::. <;J- .1.' '.
OV.JJ ~ - - ,......- .. ., ~...~
f'; ._f.tJ,IP.,
~a-L ~{;
tL4 UJ// , ", L. /(',(J "'2. C A'
?,f.
-.
""'" I ,
~nature .. . Printed Name. Address
.- ~m ~~.L~/JAMr#J 6zle~.rI- 1(1 ilOt!L
.6~a /1i1~t ~r-t"tJa Git.hr;s+ IIi e-. /{)~
\6\'1 t Dl IU~ ,?-l E . tofu
. Jr' . G 0;. / /Ot-~.
, ~:T)/J...
.,~ ! ~~,.... /~b t=- 1~7~.
it I G: r'" LA . ~ureL-
. .~ ~/./ . ~ cr
'--mfl,tu1.r~) (~q'r Mtu-;/"t'1. ~25u, 9lJ' ~'&~fl.f
~. , I I d '
I . li r.L . ~' . F' J:r tJ.,r rY1'!rO 'b~ c:;. ~(Jf"'.v ·
:. It. . SILL L. ~.~ <;JAo<.i-Ht. z-Iq w. S+~
fjJJ~~ ${
~7r 7:g;.f!,y-
- / / .
~fr~ )- ~/
~ ~~J.IJ~
.~'..
.tf;J
m IE l!J lED \'1 R~
1 p "! .
IIWl - 61!1!11 :~i
PORT AN\:tliS j
I/we the underSigned oppose the rezoning application Northwe "I'" - R r
Lots 13 through 16, Block 268, TPA generally descri~ as the southwest comer of 8th
and Lincoln Streets, Port f'ngeles, Washington:
.
.- Petition
u. L'tl,I"M':: .f), I I Y
Z"'?>2. u..J. q~
- - I.
9! I PI 1- <-?J1. I- e::> ,''6 V
. ~
2-/B .;.0 -1 .....-
D. R IS ~ t I W!iJ:1(
rr.e.Sf(lnn~y
J.. J . )./ ~ ~ t ~ r
~ I." "
L ;, 7 ltJ. 'f't6
l.;r "I ~ l{ "r ~
Q /J.
l:'" L...>. J -
."",.,.
'}:"" .
.w
.
-
.
.
.
-
, 2 1. 5u Lc... ~..~ I .~
"-
.....
, " "\
. \
J
b~
I,,'
"",?:~ -
~""':C" _
~
~ ~..-~~t
m-, IE m (I 0 , @.
r jl
, I .
; .-61998 :.
(L. i-
PO~T AIi\;~i.c~
. P1._N~I~G o~p.~::n.~,'T
l/we the undersigned oppose the . rezoning application Northwest Permit Rms:02, for
lots 13 through 16, Block 268, TPA generally described as the southwest comer of 8th
and Lincoln Streets~ Port Angeles, Washington: . - .
Petition
Sianature . - .
Printed Name
~ Ul1 Nt) k -1 MJ..J..fJ
~l,~ i. ~~(I..~
("-- '-
v
~.Q.4 ~W\trJ
SAtJ~~- aEl-L-E~^,
.
Address f .
.
JiLl ~ 1'tJ. ."
I/D C. q L!!. .,
~ 7/-l
Cf~ ..
(2 z.. E 9-\L ..
/30 , q-rd '.
..
\' )..-
~k~~~
. ~~ L \ ';j.J~
/
_ \lkw\f '"" \) C- tA fjJf k 7
;r IIME.{'. ~ 1 z F7()J.}
\...
,. "'- "....-" ~
----- - ".- ........
,- -. ''- . --....
\.\.\ ~" ~ "Vf.A~ C) J~\'
--
.." ,,(,
.' -- )... )\,
-. c .,.,.
)/<; t. I
. I
.
), .'..." { .~:"". .J
7ha.-cA;f)~ 1;1 .,..jatu~
I ) ~ X'-- \. ~
:ff ~ u .) ~"^-
,,;).;, 'y l'~ /'1
, /
. /
',J'~r/' \/ 71h{ {.,h-,.. y
. / "
~lvt+ rc ~(){' Ie ,Ivt. I~I+-IR@~
~w, \) ~~j:>,yfR
~et{2 -17~r
.- / / ~ k
/,,: ..;.. ~ '-. I L. -
13"4 S.> f!..I1eIJ!.LJ
\ \ \ W 9~'- ·
III Lv. cr1l-
.
1"7 ",/~
.
"<.."tf-'n:-:~?:';:'
iffI..,...-
'\:'-'
-~~':t.'"
";,c:'~'
m
Ellowmr
March 4, 1998
"-691
" .
I.
~ i :! ; -
. "" I
I .
"-'" .
i
PORT ANGElES
PlANNING DEPf,RWENT
chyof Port Angeles
Planning Commission
321 East 5th St.
Port Angeles, W A 98362
AnN:
Planning COMQlission
1 am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street between
Laurel and Lincoln Streets.
..
.
I am the renter of the property located at 118 East 9th St.
I oppose the rezoning application for the following reasons:
. The traffic impact of yet another business. which accessed Laurel, 8th Street. Lincoln. and
9th Street would compromise the safety of my family, especially my children. My one
child is enrolled at Jefferson Elementary. She used to walk to school every day. 1 now
take my daughter to school in the morning because traffic on Lincoln Street has increased
due to the espresso stand located at the comer of 9th Street and Lincoln. Traffic was
already heavy on this mainstreet, but once this shop went in traffic in the A.M. hours has
increased. The drivers are not always aware of the children walking to school. and my
d~ughter was almost hit once by a car pulling out of the espresso stand who was in too
big of a hurry to wait for traffic coming down Lincoln. As of right now during the after
work around (4:30 _ 5:30 pm) cars already cut down our street to avoid the light on 8th
Street and Lincoln. They turn onto our streef'and then drive down a few blocks sO as to
avoid the wait at the light. These drivers are already in a hurry, which is why they cut
down our street, and they are nOl-always paying attention to the children on our street.
, .
.
The quality of life we enjoy in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
noise. traffic, artificial lighting. refuse removal, and the unknown dangers business brings
to a community, such as -robberies. vandalism, and loitering.
.
The integrity and aesthetics of the Cherry Hill vicinity would be compromised with any
further business district encroachment. My house was built in the late 1930~s. I know
a lot of older homes in this neighborhood. We love these old homes not only for their
looks, but for their history. My house, from what my relatives have told me. was built
by either a prominent Port Angeles judge or mayor. By encroaching on our residential
neighborhoods you are destroying the integrity that we love to see in this historical part
of town.
108
"\)7
City of Port Angeles
Proposed Rezone
Page tWo
.
The City of Port A.ngeles has many vacant. undeveloped, and established sites already
zoned. for busineSS. use in this vicinity. These sites could be further developed for
commercial use without further encroacbment ~n this established neighborhood. At a time'
when the downtown area of this city is crying for more bUsiness, I do not" understand the
need to rezone in residential neighborhoods. We, as a city, need to defme"the parameters
of our business areas and leave the neighborhoods alone for the purpose that they serve.
that of a home and not a business. We need to stop the plunking down of businesses
into residential neighborhoods and come up with a clear and distinct plan for the future
businesses coming to our town, and/or relocation of current businesses.
For the above stated reasons I hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in Northwest
Permit REZ 98-02.
I understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
'u:~~ ~~
Marsha L. Pearson
118 E. 9th Street
Pon Angeles. WA 98362
.-
..:;"
109
..l.;_.....
~'.
.-.....-,
.
I .
.
.
\>6
.
.
.
".,4,:
. .- .
. ,--:.c..
ill M~~6D~ M!~
, ..'
City pf Port Angeles
Planning commission
321 East 5th St. ,
Port Angeles. WA 98362
~r.1 AN::LE~
PLJ~~':':'~''''' .r,:- '" ....... ,-. "
I .
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
I
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of LotS 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Uncoln Streets.
) J~ c ~+A. ~
I am the Owner(s)/~ntel'(s) of the property located at ' "K c- -, ~
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhood because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment, not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cheny Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business distrid encroachment.
. The traffic impad of yet another business. which accesses Laurel, 8th Street. Lincoln, and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The qualttY of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
nOise. tralfic. artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a co~munity. such as robberies, vandalism and loitering. '
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant. undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These sites could' be further developed for '
commerCIal use without further encroachment on this established neighborhood.
For the above stated reasons IJwe here~ oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
)
SIncerely.
~~
Name ~ n
\\~ S q-r.57' '?1" rtN....~ WJQ %3IPL
A;"'~Ss/City/St8l8lZiP -
Date ,4: \ ~
110
\)~
~.,-",..
...,.............
:.-:;.;~.;:;. j
i;
..-
City of Port A~geles
Planning commission.' .
321 East 5th St.
Port Angeles, .WA 98362
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Uncoln Streets.
I am the ~)Irenter(S) of the plOp8IIy Iocaied at Ij tj I: q-rJ ~.
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhood because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment. not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cherry Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business distrid encroachment. .
. The traffic impact of yet another business. which accesses Laurel, 8th Street. Uncoln, and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
. 'nolse. traffic. artificial lighting. refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
. a community. such as robberies, vandalism and loitering.
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant. undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These sit. could be further developed for
commercaal use without further encroachment on this established neighborhood.
For the above stated reasons l/we hereby.~oPpose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Pennit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning. it will then set a precedent
Sincerely,
~J0AJd./itcltm01
Name -17 YJ
ilL{ r:; q ~. ,.Jd1.i ~~.L) Wit Cf8a~
AddresslCitylStateJZip . ..
~o..Ar~ In J'1QY
Date '
.
111
\>\0
,.....-....
:~~.~
.
City of Port Angeles
Planning commission
321 East 5th St..
Port Angeles, WA . 98362
-
rnlE~rnw~w
Ml-68 ~
,
PORT AN I
PlANNING DE;~L I
-
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Uncoln Streets.
I am the Owner(s)/renter(s) of the property located at 8/950. taul1!~ I?I? ql~ 3f:.L
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
.
. This established neighbOrhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighbortlood because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment, not a business distriCt. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cherry Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business distriCt encroachment.
. The traffic impact of yet another business, which accesses Laurel, 8th Street, Lincoln, and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighbortlood would be diminished by
nOIse. traffic. artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a community, such as robberies, vandalism and loitering:
. The City of Port Angeles has many. vacant. undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These siteS could be further developed for
commercial use without fur1her encroachment 0"" this established neighbortlood.
For the above stated reasons I/we hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Pennit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
.
~n~~hj z;{ J;H
t. ~ .-
Name kl 9 J t. a...w1 /'tf't -{- 12"'1 gl1/ t ~&(..
AddressICitylS~elZip .
. '2,/!:'-lft~
Date
112
1> \ \
IfDJ IE 1# fED IV IE .fij).
l1IJ IWl - 6 19!8 @ I
.
PORJANGElfS
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
City of Port Angeles
Planning commission
321 East 5th St.
Port Angeles. .WA 98362
f :
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of lotS 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Uncoln Streets.
I am the Owner(s)/renter(s) of the property located at PI9 S '^ /.4U/U.L." AI1. 9ff~Z-
./
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
"
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
andJor rent my home in this neighborhood beCause I want to raise my family in a quality
environment. not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cherry Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business distrid encroachment. .
. The traffic impad of yet another business. which accesses Laurel. 8th Street. Uncoln, and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighbOrhood Would be diminished by
nOise; traffic. artificial lighting. refuse removal and the unknown dangers bUSiness brings to
a community. such as robberies. vandalism and loitering. . .
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant. undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity, These sit,s cOuld be further developed for
commercaal use without further encroachment on this established neighborhood,
For the above stated reasons l/we hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning. it will then set a. precedent.
-:.1'.1'/7. I /
. '
a ~/f 5;// ~I 1i,/(i,..dLlt'f. JtIJ tf$C-
A~reSS/C~?teJZiP
"j ~ r,?
Date
.
113
\)\~
..'...
---~- ,,"~-~.......
.,..-',...::".':;--..... '.
.
rfiJ m 00 m n W) ~ ~;
UlJ teMR - 6 f998
-
. City .of Port Angeles
Planning commission
321 East 5th St.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
PORT ANGElfS
PlANNING DEPARTMENT.
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Uncoln Streets.
I am the Owner(s)/renter(s) of the property located atll t( ~ ~
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
.
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhood because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment, not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cherry Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business district encroachment.
. The traffic impact of yet another business, which accesses Laurel. 8th Street, Uncoln, and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
nOise. traffic. artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a community. such as robberies. vandalism and loitering.
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant. undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These si!8s could be further developed for -
commercial use without further encroachment on this established neighborhood.
For the above stated reasons l/we hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Pennit REZ 98-02.
.
l/we understand if this ~ is approved for rezoning. it will then set a precedent.
Sincerely.
~~.~~~
ame . TN "
Il..!:L-..e q 1'c<<r A.~~..s:( ~~ .~.
AddresslCitylStatelZip / ' ~ (...2-
'3 _ t. - / Ii iiI
Date .
114
1>\~
~..
',""T".
'~~;\,:
.
"
. I'LAN':1f:b ~~~fMtENT
I
I .
City of Port Angeles . .
Planning commission
321 East 5th St. .
Port Ar:'geles,.WA 98362
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Uncoln Streets.
I am the Ownerls)/renter(s) of the property located at 6/~2 #. 9.z:4--
-
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhOod because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment. not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cherry Hill vicinity .
would be compromised with any further business district encroachment
. The traffic impact of yet another business. which accesses Laurel, 8th Street. Uncoln. and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The quality of Hfe we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
nOIse. traffic. artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a community. such as robberies. vandalism and loitering.
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant. undeveloped and established sites! already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These sit. could be further developed for
commercial use without further enaoachment on this established neighborhood.
,For the above stated reasons IIwe hereby:oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
SIncerely.
N~K_d'~
J(2:J.. c. 9 ZJ"Y h,t(T "fN'G~~ e'~~ U/n 98.J't'.z..
A.ddresslCitylStatelZip ,
:J-J-?B
.
Date
115
\)\ 4-
.
.
.
,-,:'
City of Port Angeles .
Planning commission
3~1 East 5th St.
Port Angeles, WA .98362
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
t
,-, .~,
POm ANGHf':: .
PlANNING (I~oi':'
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Lincoln Streets.
I am the Owner~)JRilRte'(!I) of the property located at .J31/ t II ~L9 it S Irfe ~, p. f) .
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
. This established neighborhC?od is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhOod because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment. not a business distrid. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cherry Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business distrid encrOachment
"
. The traffic impad of yet another business, which accesses Laurel, 8th Street. Lincoln, and
9th. Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family. .
. The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by.
nOise. traffiC. artificial lighting. refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a C9mmunity, such as robberies, vandalism and loitering.
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant. undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These.sites could be further developed for .
commercaal use without further encroachment on this established neighborhood.
For the above stated reasons IJwe hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Nonhwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
Sincerely,
/vi. Ho^-d~ ')
~~" ~
116
1)\5
'~'~
.;J...~.
.
City of Port Angeles ,
Planning commission.' .
321 East.5th St.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
m
mm~owmG1l
..1 :
, I;
MAR - A 1998 ! ' " :
......'j A' -:r: :"
Pl:'" ,'~'
I '
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Uncoln Streets.
I am the Owner(s)/renter(s) of the property located at &ft-'i ~. l~;~J
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
. and/or rent my home in this neighborhood because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment. not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cherry Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business district encroachment. .
. The traffic impact of yet another business. which accesses Laurel, 8th Street. Lincoln. and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The Quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
nOise. traffic. artificial lighting. refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a community. such as robberies. vandalism and loitering.
. ~he City of Port Angeles has many vacant. undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for bUSiness use in this vicinity. These s~s could be further developed for .
commercial use without further encroachment on this established neighborhood.
For the above stated reasons l/we httreby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
Sincerely.
M.y ~ M f ~ b~ C (J,..,R f,,- -
Name ~ ~
q()(-J ~ J G/..t.4".L' "YMi Jl,.,~.JL.S /~&f'
AddresslCitylStatelZiP.' ,
~,j.6j9
Date
~3f;2..
.
117
~ cLe. "OWl .k W'; ((,N ilL tu..Ul~ ~H- b-u. ~~ ~ s .. J... r r-I S ,'rLc..A.. 1 uz:Jl.
,
R-t'R~ dvLS y[ '.../.
\-)\ ("
.
.
.
, :;~;ilA"
""-_.'~:"~t~
"
City of Port Angeles
Planning commission
321 East 5th St.
Port A~geles, Wf\ 98362
rn IE Ie IE B " IE '@
Mf'R - .4 .
I I
PORT ~
PlANNING~ .
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Uncoln Streets.
I am th~e~i 11 L -rA) of the property locat~d at ~ Z Z .5,. Lt:L. u,.~, / R .,~ A V\J ~ It'S
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhood because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment, not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cherry Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business district encroachment
. The traffic impact of yet another business. which accesses Laurel, 8th Street, Lincoln. and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
nOise. traffic. artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a community. such as robberies, vandalism and loitering.
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant, undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These.sites could be further developed for
commercial use without further encroachment on this established neighborhood.
For the above stated reasons l/we hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
Sincerely,
f-~ l M;
~ 2 Z.$;,. Lc.. v-rt r
AddresslCity/StatelZip
~-'-C;K
Date
~
".. ~ /J VlJ ,. /,f IA/ If ~f7' z.
118
\)\7
..,~~
',~,,!
.
rD)I!(I~Dwmfn)
UI] .. - .4 .. lEJ
City of Port Angeles
Planning commission
321 East 5th St.
Port Angeles: WA 98362
I 1.1.'
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Uncaln Streets. .
I am the Owner(s)/renter(s) of the property located at
9/?3 S. 6~tod1
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhood because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment, not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cherry Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business district encroachment. .
. The traffic impact of yet another business, which accesses Laurel, 8th Street, Uncoln. and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The Quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood Would be diminished by
nOIse. traffic. artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a community. such as robberies, vandalism and loitering. .
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant. undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These smps cOuld be further developed for
commercial use without further encroachment on this established neighborhood.
For the above stated reasons l/we hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
~~-c-IJ/ 9JJ(;L
/
.
119
~\ro
.
.
.
:t""
e"":. ;'~',.
"':,'_:'~~;' '-'" "
, ..:.~,
'. .,':",\~",
IroJ IE C lED , IE ~.
~J M6R -4 Jg i j ~
1-.
I
PORI Ar~GELE;;
PlANNING OEPARWfNT
CiW qf Port Angeles
Planning commission
321. East 5th St.
Port Angeles. WA 98362
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13.through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Uncoln Streets.
I am the~nter(S) of the property located at d ~ ~ F. $!'Si.
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhOod because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment. not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cherry Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business district encroachment.
. The traffic impact of yet another business. which accesses Laurel. 8th Street. Lincoln. and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
nOIse. ~ artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown. dangers business brings to
a community. such as robberies. vandalism and loitering.
-
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant. undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These .sites could be further developed for-
commercaal use without further encroachment on this established neighborhood.
For the above stated reasons l/we hereby oppose the rezoning of this area .as stated in the
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
SIncerely. ~ ~
nD.~~ -\; "r.l.\
Na~33 E - tJ51 ~wJt q23&d
Add~?~:aq'
Date
120
0\ l\
c.",;.;;,;S'
.:.~~
't;..~'
m " ~ If D W If 1m.
UAD - , 1998 '0 '.
rn\'~ ',..
!--
.
,
PCf:r "u~ [LF.~
PLANNING D=:'..,'=' 'o:m
City of Port Angeles
Planning commission
321 East 5th St.
Port Angeles, WA. 98362
I .
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Uncoln Streets. .
I am the Qwner(s)/renleI(s) of the property lac:ated 81..9 03> ,<":", ~cAo ·
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in- this neighborhood . because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment, not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cheny Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business district encroachment. .
. The traffic impact of yet another business, which accesses Laurel, 8th Street. Lincoln, and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
nOIse. traffic. artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a community, such as robberies, vandalism and loitering.
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant, undeveloped and established sites aiready
zoned for business use ift this vicinity. These s~s could be further developed for
commercial use without further encroachment o'n this established neighborhood.
For tne above stated reasons lIwe hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as' stated in the
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/We understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
uJl\ C(X6 56'2-
.
121
1::>20
.
.
.
. .~"-'.
~>:'i.l~~"7l~- - '-
-~- <5,~, .'
City of Port Angeles
Planning commission
321 'East 5th St..
Port Angeles', WA 98362
AiTN:
Planning Commission:
PC:: r A;r~:::~E~
PlAN!.'j';::; :.:i>','T ,.... .
----~- '..-
<< .
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Uncoln Streets.
I am the Owner(s)/renter(s) of the property located at ~rP/ ~ ./fP1! ~ , ~ .11/1/ 9f3~z..-.
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons: .
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhood because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment. not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cheny Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business district encroachment.
. The traffic impact of yet another business, which accesses Laurel, 8th Street. Lincoln, and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by .
nOise. traffic, artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a community. such as robberies, vandalism and loitering.
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant. undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These-Sites could be further developed for
commercial use without further encroachment on this eS\8b\ist}ed neighborhood.' J ~
.,.,.c. .ro ~..IJu- ~tl?I ~ ~ 4.L~P:7 t'<- j.,J,.. Sf- -.
For the above stated reasons lIwe hereby oppose"the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Nortnwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
SIncerely,
~,f;~ ~'tJD4- .s Bu~1I-
Name
:;l09 C. ~, {JI::.. h~.um 9f,,,v
AddresslC~lStateJZip
.3-'''7 V
Date
122
b~\
'tt".',:-
:~~w.::
-1_';~.. - .
.,-"...~ -
.
00
IE @ M n w ~ ~.
MAR-41998 j!;;
~
City of Port AngeleS
Planning commission
321 East 5th St.
Port Angeles. .WA 98362
POnT ANGELES
PLANNING OEPARWENT
I .
ATTN:
Planning. Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of LotS 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Uncoln Streets.
I am the Owner(s)/renter(s) of the property located at /3'
vtI. .Cf~
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhood because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment. not a business distrid. The integrity and aesth,eties of the Cheny Hill vicinity
would be compromised 'With any further business district encroachment .
. The traffic impad of yet another business. which accesses Laurel, 8th Street. Uncoln. and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
nOise. traffic. artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business ~rings to
a community. such as ,robberies. vandalism and loitering.
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant, undeveloped and establishepsites already
zoned for busir:-ess use in this vicinity. These s~s' could be further devel~ped for
commercaal use without further encroachment on this established neighbOrhood.
For the above stated reasons l/we hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent
Sincerely. .
~t~~
Nai~~~<7 fgrtAn.gefd, l1i '83b2-
Address/City/St8t~ ' '
J-~-':L~
Date
.
123
\)~~
.
.
.
, -",j;fi.
.\-,:~:~
.{~
CIty of Port AngeleS
Plaming commission
321 East 5th St
Port Angeles, WA 98362
~J E~ ~ 40 ~ E
I
ill 1
I
A TIN: Planning Commission:
ponT ANGElES
P~TMENT
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 "II !ailt
between L:aurel and Uncoln Streets. .
I am the Qwner(s)lrenter(s) of the property located at
. . . )
.' .<-.' \
--
;. "
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhood because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment, not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cheny Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business district encroachment.
. The traffic impact of yet another business, which accesses Laurel, 8th Street, Uncaln, and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The quality of life we have enjoyed in-this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
noise. traffic. artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a community, such as robberies, vandalism and loitering.
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity . These sites could be further developed for
commercial use without further enaoachment on this established neighbomood.
F or the above stated reasol1s l/we hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
IIwe understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
Sincerely.
,~. ,
Name
-,
AddresslCitylStatelZip
~, ---
Date
-.
124
\)-:l.3
.
~>>...
",i<~
. ,~,~~.
,'~;f
.
Iii.) II Ie liD " m Iii) ,
00 MJ.q - .4 9! ~J!. .
I
.1
c ' . .
City of Port Angeles
Planning commission
321 Easf5th St
Port Angeles, WA 98362
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
PerlT ANGELES
PlAN~'NG OEPARTP.'~NT
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhood because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment, not a business districi.The integrity and aesthetics of the Cheny Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business district encroachment.
.
. The traffic impact of yet another business, which accesses Laurel, 8th Street, Lincoln. and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
. nOIse. traffic, artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a community. such as robberies, vandalism and loitering. . .
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant. undeveloped and esUlblished sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These siteS'could be further developed for
commercial use without further encroachment on this established neighborhood.
. .
r"
. ~
For the above stated reasons l/we hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
Sincerely.
./2..;, ;J./ L_. .., - ~'-t,- ,1n.b- ~~ -<.
Name ~ /::)
1.2-5' tv. ~ ~u. ~~ "'0' /. - ~ ILiA ~ ~.:t'4
AddresslCitylStateJZip
-7~.J"".L ~ /qqf
Date
1 f) !"')
,{......
.
.,......,,~Ll
.
.
.
""""'?f'
~."." ..".."....'.. ". ....... '.
,\":,,;;,., '''~~~':,. ,~
II , " fjjl
.. - 219!! fUf,
~
City of Port Angeles
Planning commission
321 East 5th St.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
- ~ . "
I .
ATIN:
Planning Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Lincoln Streets.
I am the Qwner(s)/renter(s) of the property located at ~f It) /19 1: /O~ sf/2~f-1-
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reason~:
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhood because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment, not a business distrid. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cheny Hill vicinity
'would be compromised with any, further business distrid encroachment.
. The traffic impad of yet another business, which accesses Laurel, 8th Street, Lincoln. and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
. The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
nOIse. traffic. artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a community. such as robbe~S, vandalism and loitering.
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant. undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These-sites could be further developed for'
commerctal use without further encroachment on this established neighborhood.
For the above stated reasons l/we hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the .
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/We understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
SIncerely.
J)~~..u ",... 61/e.J,~".J',t-
Name
//1 ~ /1J.t!J
Addres~Crtyr.stat~p
~6A..t:... ~ t.t.u L.,U"'?# ~ .;l.....
Date ~/9'
12&
D~S-
...'if:'
:~~
.
I -
.
."
~
127 .
----
-
.w
.
.
".'~
,;".....'.
'.r."""
'~~~~"",.' "
"'}~~ ..~
r
r
Washington State
Department of Transportation
aid Morrl.on
Secretary of Transportation
OtrmPlc ....101I ...........rt....
, 5720 Capllol Boulevard. lumwater
PO 80.47440
Olympia, WA ~504-7440
(3601357.2600
Fax (360l 357-2601
June 19, 1998.
ill ~ @ ~ 0 WI IE @'
~ 2 A 1998 .
I PORT ANGELES
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
-
Sue Roberds
City of Port Angeles
, Planning Department
321 East Fifth Street
Port Angeles, W A 98362
I',
SRI01, MP 247.56 Right Vicinity
Rite-Aid Drugstore
E.C. File No. 98044-C
Dear Sue:
We have received and reviewed the above proposal and have the following
comments:
The State recommends the propon~nt connect directly to 9th S1. in lieu of the
proposed access connection to SRIOI (Lincoln Ave.) The proposed project would
degrade traffic flow below the Departments Level of Service "0". This
degradation will require mitigation to achieve LOS "0" for the Horizon Year of
2000. Safety ofpermittedJprotected operation at the signal is also a concern. The
Department would prefer protected 'phasing. '
The Department ~as classified this section ofSRI0l as a Class 4 Facility. Per
WAC 468-52, Class 4, no more than one access shall be provided to an individual
parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership unless it can be shown
that additional access points would not adversely affect the desired function.
safety. or operation of the State Highway. The' minimum distance to another
public or private access connection shall be 250 feet. The proponent must obtain
an Access Connection Permit from the Department. .
The Department can only au:ept surface water runoff equal in quality and quantity
to that of the pre-developed site. 'Any additional surface water runoff generated
will require appropriate stormwater treatment measures in accordance with the
Department of Ecology Storm water Management Manual.
126
^....-r" r I.' r-...11 ~ f\.1\ 1==
" .:.......
Sue Roberds
Junel9, 1998
P~ge 2
~
r
Ad~ertising signs visible from an adjacent State Highway must comPly with the
State Scenic Vistas Act of 1971, which.is administered by the Department. For
information regarding the signing reguta.tioDS, contact Jack Smith in the Olympic
Region Traffic Operations office at (360) 357-2620.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal. If there are any questions
regarding our comments, please contact Dawn Naylor at (360) 357-2706.
dws
Sincerely,
;::P~L ~~
DALE C. SEVERSON. P.E.
Development Services Engineer
."
.-
129
~)
""'.'~.:;'
'_~;c~
. -!"f.,
.
I .
.
.
.~~
.
S CITY OF PORT ANGELES - PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT
". MEMORANDUM
~ -=-- ~
,
~~ ' -MAlNTAJN#NG AND 8UILDING A BETTER COIIMI.JNIT'r
. m IE III IE 8 WI ~ pl
MAY 2 9 1998 -_J
.j -
" ,
May 29, -1998 . ' PORT ANGELES .
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT (;
GARY W. KENWORTHY f;>>..~ ENGINEER
RITE AID DRUGSTORE #5257 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REVIEW
TO:
FROM:
Public Works Utility Services Engineering has reviewed the subject traffic impact analysis
prepared by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. of Bellevue and dated May 7, 1998.
The following is my comments regarding the report:
.
1. The report did not directly discuss the impacts on side streets and alley adjacent to the
project. We do not anticipate these impacts to be significant. The consultant has been
requested to prepare a short addendum to the report which addresses these impacts.
\.
2. We agree with the consultants conclusions and proposed mitigation measures nos.1,2,
&4. These will be a requirement of the project.
3. The proposed mitigation measure no. 3 is' to change the existing signal to a
protective/permissive left turn phasing which would reduce delays and allow more traffic
through the intersection. This change would be a step back in protection however,' since
the current signal provides fully protected left turn moves. The State Department of
Transportation does not support this proposed change but stated that the City makes the
final decision. We recommend.that this mitigation not be implemented at this time and that
the City retain the fully protected moves at this time in the interest of traffic safety. The
current emerge~ vehicle signal override Opticom system does not provide fully protected
moves. We are requesting that the developer upgrade the signal with the provide the two
additional Opticom chamels to provide this protection. In addition we are requesting that
the developer contribute the cost of the proposed mitigation no. 3 signal changes
($10,000) to be utilized for future traffic volume/safety improvements on 8th and/or Lincoln
Streets in the project area.
130
4. In the report it was noted that the consultant projected future traffic using a conservative
5% traffic volume growth factor. The City and the Peninsula RTPO are utilizing 2% traffic
growth factors. Table 1 in.the consultants report indicated that the Lincolnl8th intersection
in th~ year 200Q woul~ drop to a seasonal LOS of E (44.2) with the proposed
protective/permissive left turn phasing and seasonal LOS of F (65~6) without. Since we are
recommending that the protective/permissive phasing not be implemented the consultant
.
^~. "... I , " . r::-. ~ "C..
"'I'
"i~~;':;'--'~;_: ,
~'~\hh
was requested to recalculate the year 2000 seasonal LOS using the 2% growth fa~or and .
the seasonal LOS improved to E (45.0). The consultant also checked this seasOnal LOS
using a 2% auto and 5% truck growth factor to allow for summer recreational vehicles and
the Level remained atE (55.8). A copy of the recalculation is attached.
Overall we are comfortable with the project and the proposed traffic mitigation mea~; ;res as
revised. The existing average LOS and the proposed project LOS in the year 2000 remain at D.
The existing seasonal LOS and proposed year 2000 seasonal LOS using the 2% growth factor
remain 'at E. There will be increased traffic but the above mitigation measures should maintain
the current level of service at the intersection. ct'
GWKlgk
CQC)IeS; J, PlttlS
Anach.: RecalC LOS
LOC: N\PROJECTS\98-07RTA\TRANs.GWK
File 98-07.08
.
13l
.
F'2
.
MEMORANDUM
Coral Wheeler
AdministratIve AssIstant
ext 4650
.uce W: Becker
Fire Chief
ext 465'
Daniel K. McKeen
Fire Marshal
elC1 4653
L. . Keith Bogues
T raInIng OffIcer
elC1 4652
James B. (Duke) Moroz
MedIcal OffIcer
ext 4665
36~ 1 7 -4655
.
DATE:
TO:
PROM:
RE:
m
. .. ',.':;. .,"c<':~-
-:~,:.';,.:...:;':.:"-_::~-~-;':':~,:::'
.,'-t~~
N ~~~:~-f.S
"i'.-.'
I m le OW m R.
\: .
FEB 2 31998 j~
ROtJ'1'B '1'0:
Bui1c!i119 Dept. 1:1
Pl..ftft~Jlg Dept. B'
Public Works lJ
C:i ty Manager lJ
PORT ANGELES
PLAMP\lNG o:p;.~:' .~~:'
( .
February 23, 1998
Planning Department
Dan McKeen, Fire Marshal
Rezone Application - REZ 98-03
Northwest permit - 8th/Lincoln
The Fire Deparement has reviewed the request to
rezone property located at the southwest corner of
8th and Lincoln Streees, between 8eh and 9th
Streees to eSD, and has no objections.
DM/cw
....
~-j
132
FP - 26
Page 1 of 1
AI\AC\4~E~C7
.,.
~.
131
. i.;">. .:~)
~~
.:..~
.
.
.
I--~
"Maintaining
and building
a better
community"
Jack Plttfs
Dlractor {4801}
Phyllis Rasler
Administrative
Assistant {4800}
Cate Rinehart
Administrative
Assistant {4700}
Bob TItus
Deputy Dlractor {4701}
Ken Ridout
Deputy Dlractor {4802}
Gary Kenworthy
City Engineer {4803}
Jim Harper
Electrical Engineer
{4702}
Tim Smith
Contract & Projact
Administrator {4804}
Lou Heehnlen
, Sf. Building Inspector
{4816}
Tom Spertlne
Sf. Electrtcallnspector
{4735}
Scott Mclain
Power Manager {4703}
Ralph Ellsworth
Water. Wastewater
Collection
SUperintendent {4855}
Pete Burrett
Equip. Services
Superintendent {4835}
Marle Shamp
Ught Operations
Manager {4731}
Kevin Curtis
TTfHlt. Plant
Supervisor {4845}
Tom McCabe
SW Collactlon
Supervisor {4876}
Steve Evans
landfill Supervisor
{4873J
Dave Wilcox
Slreet Maintenance
Supervisor {4825J
r41EMORA~DUM
DATE:
July 2, 1998
TO:
Planning Department
FROM:
Gary W. Kenworthy
SUBJECT: Telephone message re WSDOT comm
ill~@~DW~m
JUL 2 1 1998
I
Il nts qnai~m_s to II
ncoln
Mr. Dale Severson P.E., WSDOT Development Services Engineer, left me a voice message
this morning stating that he had been in conversation with Rite-Aid's traffic consultant, Mark
Jacobs, and that he was not aware that 9th Street was a sensitive residential street at the time
of him comments dated Jyne 19,. 1998. He further stated that they would not oppose the
access onto Lincoln, as proposed, since it is located as far as feasible from the 8th Street
signal. In closing he stated that the City has the final call on the Lincoln Street access. I called
Mr. Severson at WSDOT to onfirm his comments.
GWK:gk
Attachments:
Copy:
Disk:N:\PROJECTS\98-07RTA\TRANS1.GWK
File: 98-07.08
\
----
MEMORANDUM
321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, Washington 98362 Phone: (360) 417-4750
Brad Collins, Director, Extension 4751: Sue Roberds, Extension 4750: Davit! Sawyer, Extension 4752
August 4, 1998
TO:
Mayor Braun, Councilmembers, and Manager Ibarra
FROM:
Planning Department
SUBJ:
Letters Regarding the Northwest Permit Rezone Application
The attached information was submitted following the close of written public comment for the Planning
Commission's consideration and was set aside to be copied for the Council's deliberation. In so doing, the
attached materials were overlooked in the copying process.
The comments include a letter from Bob and Kathleen Bailey, a letter from a neighbor, Janelle Gellein, and
two additional petition signers. The Bailey's did refer to the letter during testimony for the street vacation
application at the Planning Commission's public hearing and provided testimony at Council's July 21st
hearing regarding the rezone application.
This has been a long process and we apologize for the oversight.
Attachments
June 23, 1998
ill
rn @ ~ u w ~ @""""~l!
I I'
",IUN 2 5 1998 I 'II
, PORT ANGELES
PLANNiNG DEf'ARjI,mJT I
Sue Roberds, Planning Office Specialist
City Planning Department, City Hall
321 East Fifth St
Port Angeles, W A 98362
RE: Northwest Permit for the Baldridge Group
Gentlemen:
The Bailey's wish to go on record as NOT apposing the request by the Baldridge Group to rezone
the property known as Lots 1-6 and 13-16, Block 268 (southwest corner of 8th and Lincoln Streets).
However, we do wish to add that we have concerns. We also support the concerns of our neighbors.
We feel the primary focus of any rezone decision must be rendered in favor of the neighborhood.
This area is residential. These are our homes; our lives center here. Several generation of families
have raised their children here during my life time. My parents purchased our property in the early
1930's. Most of the "old neighbors" are gone. My mother, at age 93, the Jacobson boy's, Mrs. Kidd
on 10th Street and myself are from that" old neighborhood". It was a great place to live and grow up
and still can be a great place with the rezone provided residential standards are maintained.
Living next to the ally, we are not strangers to commercial business's. From the time of Dean's
Market (now Butcher Boones) and Nailor's Lumber Company (now Peninsula Counseling),
residential and commercial have lived in peace and harmony. This is still the case. Butcher Boone's
place is old but the property is kept clean, free from odd and little or no noise. The Salvation Army
just to the north of to us has certainly caused a lot of problems for us due to the nature of their
business. However, they have always made every effort to correct and assist with solutions. They
are excellent neighbors.
The glass shop and drywall further down the ally has taken a toll on the condition ofthe ally. The
majority of the commercial traffic that services these business's use Lincoln to 9th Street to Laurel
then right at the alley; exiting on Lincoln once deliveries have been completed. There are
approximately 60 heavy commercial vehicles that use this alley weekly. Motor vehicles use the alley
as a frontage road to by-pass the congestion on 8th Street. We feel it is safe to say that the alley
between 8th and 9th is one of the heaviest traveled alley's in the City. As a result of this heavy usage,
the surface is trashed. The approach from Laurel onto the alley has broken pavement. The alley has
little surface pavement and is full of deep and large pot holes. The sidewalk in front of our home
at the alley is broke and the grade lower from heavy vehicles driving over it attempting to negotiate
that comer. Our garage has been hit twice; vehicles driving too close to the building to allow
movement of traffic going in the opposite direction (the traffic pattern in the alley mirror's that of
a two-way street).
The proposed site area is an eye sore. The appearance and condition of the houses located in that
section of the block are a disgrace. A new building, clean and maintained grounds would be a vase
improvement over the existing conditions.
Although we do not appose the rezone request, we do look to the City Council and the Planning
Commission to protect and assure our neighborhood receives the same standards and comfort as our
neighbors on Cherry Hill do.
The Baldridge Group needs to demonstrate they will be good neighbors. That they will respect our
property and quality of life by keeping business traffic (commercial and non-commercial) off of 9th
Street; locate and direct outside lighting away from the houses in the area; keep noise at a minimal
(deliveries at a time and in an area as not to interfere sleeping, peace and quiet we all seek after a
busy days work; maintain and enforce an no loitering/loud music policy); dumpsters located in an
area that odors will not seep into our yards and houses; that employee parking will be provided on
their site and employee's will not be allowed to park on 9th or Laurel Street and willing to work with
the residents in the future as problems arise for us as a result of their business.
The homeowners on 9th Street and on Laurel Street have all demonstrated a pride in their homes and
for the neighborhood. The Baldridge Group must respect the values the homeowners have
established and insure these values be maintained.
We have no objection to the petition for vacating the alley being granted. However, we do feel that
the alley must be repaired and undergo routine maintenance. The alley cannot remain in it's present
condition.
Sincen;ly,
(1) ,'.Y\
~t
Robert J. Bailey
4(~ (\U\~J~
t ~thleen Flora Bailey J
City of Port Angeles
Planning commission
321 East 5th St.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
00 rn@rnuw~ @
\~ I') '''98
' I, ,-
. I 'oJ ,'wi""
PORT ANGELES
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Lincoln Streets.
I am the Owner(s)/renter(s) of the property located at
2. \ C( Ll 0. t \,,, ") t
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
. This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I bought
and/or rent my home in this neighborhood because I want to raise my family in a quality
environment, ,not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cherry Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business district encroachment.
· The traffic impact of yet another business, which accesses Laurel, 8th Street, Lincoln, and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family.
· The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
noise, traffic, artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a community, such as robberies, vandalism and loitering.
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant, undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These sites could be further developed for
commercial use without further encroachment on this established neighborhood.
For the above stated reasons l/we hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
l/we understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
Sincerely, ~~'-YJ~ ~''-' --~L
Lj"~ -ttG ".\ S ~ \ \x~ ~
Name /"\
',.1. \ q vV q--\k
Address/City/State/Zip,
~) - c.~ - cf t"
Date
"
rn @ rn 0 ~7 rn
00
. AlAR . ,'" 1998
t", t U 1
r'
I" ,
:! :
1;11
~!
City of Port Angeles
Planning commission
321 East 5th St.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
PORT ANGELES
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN:
Planning Commission:
I am writing in regard to the proposed rezone of Lots 13 through 16 on East 9th Street
between Laurel and Lincoln Streets.
/yOT
I am tA.e-<'.c...,er(s)/nmm.~(s) of the property located at
I oppose this rezoning application for the following reasons:
.
This established neighborhood is one of the oldest in the City of Port Angeles. I-eo"oht
and/or rent my home in this Ileigllbod lood because I 'Nant to raise my r dlllily in d quality-
-environment, not a business district. The integrity and aesthetics of the Cherry Hill vicinity
would be compromised with any further business district encroachment.
-]1'
.
The traffic impact of yet another business, which accesses Laurel, 8th Street, Lincoln, and
9th Street would compromise the safety of myself and my family. /Ccd/sf/'Ubse'e6):'v:;
.----~_._--_.._----.:.._-------
The quality of life we have enjoyed in this residential neighborhood would be diminished by
noise. traffic, artificial lighting, refuse removal and the unknown dangers business brings to
a community, such as robberies, vandalism and loitering.
. The City of Port Angeles has many vacant, undeveloped and established sites already
zoned for business use in this vicinity. These sites could be further dev~loped for
commercial use without further encroachment on this established neighborhood.
For the above stated reasons l/we hereby oppose the rezoning of this area as stated in the
Northwest Permit REZ 98-02.
IIwe understand if this project is approved for rezoning, it will then set a precedent.
SinC~eIY, /} /' )('1 /)
.' V, urcuitA/ C/~ ~'k/~
a~~~~ ~~J Ie)!/; cSAul: Waw~4-'> Il0z 9J3&3
Ad~?~~~t"7~~y'Y /
Oat / . J ,
?c"~Ak')Y'~ V do 7U'-i': Na/;{i0 ~7Z/fu.2-' Cu4Yc'-: .J//!~ ,-
'l1hP~cur ?t5 ~au~ ~ / 4 :/'" ~~,. ~t; ttmd/'
;~:;;:i:et;t!;~ w::t::Jt:i~~d~
-.... --,-, < _._.__._._----~-
Janelle K. Gellein
110 E. 9th St.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
(360) 417-2081
00
~ 00 U \Yl m ~l
\I!AR . ...., '''''08 I :; I. '
'" ,":.... I 'J',
I ,~' lvV' L.t
March 6, 1998
PORT ANGELES
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
City of Port Angeles
Planning Commission
321 E. 5th St.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
RE: Proposed rezoning Northwest Permit REZ 98-02 for the BALDRIDGE GROUP
Attn: Planning Commission
Gentlemen:
I am writing in regarding the above proposed rezoning permit. I am the owner of the property
located at 110 E. 9th St., Port Angeles, WA.
I am opposed to this rezoning application for the following reasons:
TRAFFIC
· The width of East 9th Street at the present time will not allow (2) vehicles to pass each
other heading either East and West at the same time.
· It is very difficult to gain access or to cross on Lincoln Street from 9th heading west.
· It is very difficult to gain access or to cross 8th Street from Laurel Street heading north.
· Additional traffic due to a busifless would endanger the safety of the neighborhood.
SAFETY
· I believe that there would be an increase in crime in the neighborhood.
· I believe that fire protection would be jeopardized.
· I believe that there would be an increase in loitering in this commercial area.
· I believe that there would be an increase in hazards due to large commercial deliveries
being made to the proposed business.
· I believe that the waste disposal generated by this business would represent a hazard to
the neighborhood.
AESTHETICS OF NEIGHBORHOOD
· The lighting of a commercial property would compromise the beauty of the neighborhood.
· Large delivery trucks are unsightly.
· Commercial recycling of trash and receptacles would be unsightly in the neighborhood.
..' --_.~---_.__..---~~ . ----._~-------~.~
. ------_._--_.__.,_.._...__.,,--~._,_.
. __'__uo" ~...
-- -------.--
--.-..- -- _.._----,----------_._--~
--~-----,----_._.--.-.- .. - - -- --.---.
..J.
u
..
I.
...
City Manager's
Office'
Memorandum
Patrick Ibarra
City
Sharon "Sam" Martin
Exec. Admin. Assistant
Becky 1. Upton, CMC
City Cle~kI
Management Assistant
Robert Coons
Human Resources Manager
Camille Headrick
Human Resources Assistant
August 6, 1998
TO: Brad Collins, Planning Director
FROM: Becky J. Upton, City Clerk ~
SUBJECT: Notification to Parties of Record -
Rezone/Street Vacation Applications for Northwest Permit
On August 5, 1998, I distributed the attached Notice of Special Meeting of August 10,
1998, to the following:
Nancy Van Sickle, 819 So. Laurel, Port Angeles, WA 98362
Kathleen Bailey, 817 So. Laurel, Port Angeles, W A 98362
Scott Grainger, Baldridge Group, 600 University, #3012, Seattle, WA 98101
Deborah Hart, Northwest Permit, 2320 1st Ave., #250, Seattle, Wa 98121
Theresa Schmid, 114 E. 9th, Port Angeles, W A 98362
Martha Pearson, 118 E. 9th, Port Angeles, W A 98362
Dave Mar, Mulvaney Architects, 112 5th Ave. N, Seattle, W A 98109
Mark Jacobs, Transportation, Planning & Engineering, 2101 112th Ave. NE, #110,
Bellevue, W A 98004
The above individuals represent those who signed the attendance roster for the City
Council meeting of July 21, 1998. Please contact me should you need additional
information.
Attachment
\
.
.
.
/
".>~..' ;
XI !3
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
Brad Collins, Director. Extension 4751; Sue Roberds. Extension 4750; David Sawyer. Extension 4752,
July 31, 1998
TO:
Mayor Braun, City Council members, and Manager Ibarra
FROM:
Planning Department, Brad Collins, Planning Director
SUBJ:
STREET VACATION PETITION - STY 98-01
NORTHWEST PERMIT - Portion of the Eighth/Ninth Street alley
Between Lincoln and Laurel Streets
RECOMMEND A TIONI ACTION:
Following discussion, the Council could move to concur with the Planning Commission by adoption
of the attached draft ordinance including five conditions approving the right-of-way vacation as
proposed, citing the attached findings and conclusions, or deny the rezone application citing
findings and conclusions in support of that action.'
BACKGROUND/SUMMARY:
Following the City Council's July 21, 1998, public hearing, a special meeting was called for to
. render a final decision on the petition atwhich time an additional member of the City Council could
present. It was later decided that a special meeting would not be necessary, but to place the issue
on the CoUncil's next regular meeting, August 4. CounCil will continue its discussion on the issue.
at its August 4 meeting following which a decision \ViIl be made on the closed record. Staff will be
available for questions.
~
Sue Roberds, Plann'
Attachments: Ordinance
Findings and Conclusions
Minutes
Police Department Memo
Staff Reports
c:\wp\daily\memo.cc2
135
I
- ..
136
.
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles
vacating a portion of the alley between Lincoln
and Laurel Streets located in Block 268 ofthe
Townsite of Port. Angeles. .
WHEREAS, a petition is on file with the City of Port Angeles to vacate a porti~n
of the alley between Lincoln and Laurel Streets located in Block 268 of the Townsite of Port
Angeles; and
WHEREAS, the petition was signed by the owners of more than two-thirds ofthe
property abutting upon the right-of-way sought to be vacated; and
. WHEREAS, the City initiated said vacation by Resolution No. 10-98; and
WHEREAS, street vacations are categorically exempt from the requirements of
.
the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) as set forth in WAC 197-11-800(2)(h); and
WHEREAS, a.public hearing has been held before the City Council following
i
public notice pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW; and
WHEREAS, the street vacation appears to be of benefit to and in the interest of
the public;
NOW THEREFORE, THE J:ITY COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF PORT
ANGELES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1 - Vacation. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, the
following described right-of-way is hereby vacated:
Section 2 - Conditions
1.
The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the
City's Public Works Department (Attachment B of the July 8, 1998
Planning Department Staff Report for STV 98-0 I) which require that a
twenty-four inch sanitary sewer main will need to be relocated. A twenty
foot wide access and utility easement shall be required.
.
137
1
2.
The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the .
City's Fire Department (Attachment C of the July 8, 1998, Planning
Department Staff Report for STY 98-01) which requires that through
access shall be maintained at the west end of the vacated Eighth/Ninth
alley. The access shall be ~ minimum of twenty feet in width and shall
consist of an all weather surface. meeting the City's Public Works
Department specifications. Ail approved nrrn around meeting the City's
specifications may be approved. at the east end of the remaining
Eighth/Ninth alley in lieu of through access.
3. The street vacation shall not be finaled until a building permit is issued for
the property consistent with the revised. site . development plan
(Attachment A to the July 8, 1998, Plaiming Department Staff Report for
STY 98-0 I).
4. Final occupancy of any new structures on the site shall not be allowed
until the street vacation is complete and all of the individual lots
comprising the development site have been combined into one legal
building and zoning lot.
5. Any costs associated with utility relocation and alley realignment and/or
improvements shall be borne by the applicant.
Section 3 - Compensation. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.030 compensation for the
.
right-of-way is hereby set at 1-24.llilO~O!L
Section 4 - Quit Claim Deed. Upon satisfaction of the compensation amount in
Section 2 of this Ordinance, the owners of abutting property entitled to the vacated street,
pursuant to RCW 35.79.040, may present a.quit claim deed to the City of Port Angeles for
execution by the Mayor, who is hereby authorized and directed to execute such quit claim deed.
Such quit claim deed shall include all reservations, conditions, or other qualifications upon the
title established by this Ordinance.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall be effective only upon the satisfaction of the
terms and conditions of this Ordinance and shall be published upon that satisfaction. The City
Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy with the Clallam County Auditor and Clallam County
.
Assessor.
139
2
.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of
said Council held on the~ day of August, 1998.
Gary Braun, Mayor
ATTEST:
I .
Becky Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary
.
Nonhwcsl.sl\'
.
13q
3
1~()
.
.
.
1-------
.
.
.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF STREET VACATION PETITION
STY 98-01, Northwest Permit:
Findings:
1. The applicant for the requested vacation is Northwest Permit. The petition is
attached as Attachment A of the July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for
STY 98-01.
2. The requested vacation is for that portion of the alley between 8th Street and 9th
Street abutting Lots 1.;;6 and 13-18 of Block No. 268 in the Townsite of Port Angeles.
3. The street vacation is categorically exempt from threshold determination and
Environmental Impact Statement requirements per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the
Washington Administrative Code.
4. The subject right-of-way and abutting properties fall within the undesignated area
between the Comprehensive Plan's COIl1II!ercial land use designation to the north
and its Residential designation to the south. The majority of the abutting properties
are zoned Commercial Shopping District (CSD) with four of the properties currently
zoned Residential, Single:"Family (RS-7).
5.
The Public Works Departmenthas indicated'a 24" sanitary sewer main and overhead
electrical lines are located in the alley and will need to be relocated if the vacation
is approved.
6. The subject right-of-way is currently improved.
7. The Public Works, Fire, and Police Department's comments are included as
Attachments B, C, and D ofth~ July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for
STY 98-01.
8. The Police Department originally submitted written public safety concerns related
to the proposed vacation. These concerns include the current use of the alley for
traffic diversion in the event of an-accident at the 8th Street and Lincoln Street
intersection, the use of the alley by officers in response to calls from the bank located
at the corner of 8th Street and Oak Street, and the use of the alley for access to and
observation of the 24 hour retail/gas station use at the corner of 8th Street and
Lincoln Street.
/
9. As noted in their presentation to the Planning Commission on July 8, 1998, the
Police Department's concerns expressed in a letter dated February 23, 1998, attached
as Attachment D of the July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-
01) do not warrant denial of the proposed vacation.
10.
On May 14, 1998, the Planning Department received a traffic analysis for the
applicant's overall develppment plan which includes the proposed street vacation.
On June 3, 1998, the Planning Department received an addendum to the analysis with
comments regarding Ninth Street, Laurel Street, and the Eighth and Ninth Streets
alley.
'1 ~.
~----_.._-
I
Conclusions'
A.
The Comprehensive Plan's Utilities and Public Services Policies C, 2 and 3 and
Transportation Policy B 18 are the most rel~vant to the proposed vacation.
.
B. As conditioned, the proposed vacation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's
Utilities and Public Services Policies C, 2 and 3 and Transportation Policy B18.
C. As conditioned, the proposed vacation will not have an adverse impact on the public
health, safety and welfare.
D. As conditioned, the proposed vacation will benefit the community's economic
development as well as the general public health, safety and welfare.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of August 4, 1998.
Gary Braun, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
.
.
142
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, J 998
Page J J
. PUBLIC HEARING:
STREET V ACA TION PETITION - STV 98-01 NORTHWEST
PERMIT, a portion of the Eighth/Ninth Street alley between Lincoln and'
Laurel Streets:' A proposal to vacate right~of-way. (This item is continued
from June 10, 1998.)
Commissioner Nutter stated that she has a friend who is a property owner in the area'and
would stand down from the proceedings if requested to do so. ' No one objected and so she
remained.
Planner Sawyer reviewed the Planning Department's staff report and responded to questions
,regarding the staff report addendum which recommended approval if the Police
Department's concerns are met. Chair Reed asked Deputy Chief Tom Riepe to elaborate on
the Police Department's submitted memoranda. f\
.
Deputy Tom Riepe, Police Department, stated that although the Police Department initially
believed that the proposed alley vacation could result in a negative impact with regard to
response and observation practices by the Police Department, further analysis indicates that
the impacts which could result will not be significant enough to recommend denial of the
vacation. Response activities could easily be routed along Ninth Street and observation
activities could still occur in the proposed parking area for the development. He appreciated
the Planning Department's concerns regarding the Police Department's initial
recommendation but cannot at this point see a major detriment to public safety as a result of
, the vacation. The Police Department's initial response was submitted out of an obligation
to point out the practiced vehicular response patterns in the alley area but was not intended
to be the criteria upon which the decision to vacate or not to vacate would hinge. Further
review indicates that vacation of the alley may actually improve safety conditions in the area
which experiences a good deal of nuisance activities and complaints. Observation of
surrounding businesses would not be impacted by the proposal.
Chair Reed opened the public hearing.
Scott Grainger, Baldridge Group, 600 University #3012, Seattle, 98101, presented the
proposed development plan for- the Northwest PerrnitlRite Aid proposal planned for the
overall site. Substantial perimeter landscaping is planned as a buffer to the Ninth Street
residential area with additional landscaping on Lincoln and Eighth Streets. The development
should enhance the appearance of the two main travel arteries, Lincoln and Eighth Streets.
The group supports the police staging needs in the parking lot area and will make every
effort to accommodate those public safety issues whichjs in their best interest as well as the
neighborhood. A thirty-six foot egress is proposed to Lincoln Street in the location where
only the existing twenty foot ingress/egress location exists at present.
.
Commissioner Hewins asked Mr. Grainger if the remaining alley, which would not be
vacated, would have access to the site. Mr. Grainger responded "no".
Theresa Schmid, 114 East Ninth Street, presented testimony that the City's recent practice
has been to vacate _alleys to create large sites for development, she referenced the City's
14'3
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 12
Senior Center, the public library, the Safeway and Albertson's developments in support of .
this conclusion. She opposes forcing alley through traffic use to surrounding streets. As a
resident of the neighborhood, she disagreed with the City's Engineering Department's
conclusions that traffic patterns in the area would not be negatively impacted. The traffic
already stacks up daily at peak times which can only increase if the proposal is approved.
The traffic report indicates that the level of service of the Eighth/Lincoln intersection is at
a level "D" at present which is not acceptable to her, and to further degrade. that LOS is
completely unthinkable: She strongly recommended denial of the street vacation.
, '
Nancy Van Sickle, 819 South Laurel Street, also a neighboring resident, agreed with the
previous speaker and requested denial ofthe street vacation. She stated that vacation would
only worsen traffic in the area and the development would create a new hang out for youth
in the new parking area.
Marsha Pearson, 118 East Ninth Street, a neighboring resident, believes that vacation of
the alley as proposed would eliminate the ability of the four lots requested for rezone along
with the alley vacation project (Lots'13, 14, 15, and 16) in this block to access the alley, thus
forcing all activity from those lots if developed individually, onto Ninth Street. It is not
acceptable to route any additional traffic onto Ninth Street. Neighbors in the area park on
the street, and the street is not wide enough to accommodate two way traffic when that
parking occurs.
Kathleen Bailey, 817 South Laurel Street, is in favor of the vacation as proposed. She is .
sympathetic to her friends and neighbors in the area, but feels that the continued use of the
EighthlNinth alley in this location as a frontage road to Eighth Street is too dangerous to
allow to continue. Two way traffic occurs in the narrow alley and loitering and commercial
truck activity is excessive. The Eighth and Lincoln intersection is a problem. There have
been commercial buildings in this location for over sixty years and the uses have by and
large been good neighbors. The proposal should greatly reduce the unwanted activities in ,
the alley and increase the safety of the residents. 'Typically large amounts of traffic are
routed onto neighborhood streets, not alleys.
"
Bob Bailey, 817 South Laurel Street, explained the damage that has occurred to his property
as a result of the intensity and speed at which vehicles travel through the alley to avoid the
intersection in this location. Commercial use of the alley as a result of the existing
businesses has resulted in damage to the alley surface and curbs. He believes that vacation
of the alley as proposed will result in an increase in safety of the alley residential uses and
will force commercial traffic to be more site specific. It will result in traffic use which now
occurs in the alley to be placed onto streets where greater traffic use is anticipated.
Vandalism should be greatly reduced due to the proposed development of the area. With or
without the proposed development, some type of traffic control needs to be implemented on
this alley. It is important that if the vacation is approved, the lots facing onto Ninth Street
be closed to egress from the site development that is proposed.
Theresa Schmid, 114 East Ninth Street, asked if an emergency vehicle turn around would .
be required at the west end of the alley if the vacation were approved.
144
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 13
Al Gustafson, 903 South Peabody, asked if this action is precedent setting. He owns
commercial property in the 200 block of Eighth Street which he would like to similarly
develop and asked if this action would set the stage for that development. Planner Sawyer
responded that comments must be directed to the issue at han<;l, but noted that this would not
be a precendent setting situation.
Mr. Gustafson added that vacation ofthe alley is ~ot a good idea. To develop the site such.
that traffic now using the alley will be shifted to the neighboring street is improper. Safety
of the residents using the neighboring streets cannot be assured.
I .
Bob Dudley, 106 East Ninth Street, enouraged.the City to take a good look at the traffic
patterns in the area. He verified that Ninth Street is narrow with a good deal of on-street
parking, and the traffic is already congested. Additional traffic would be more difficult.
There being no further testimony, Chair Reed closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Nutter opened discussion regarding a turn around at the east end of the alley,
were the west portion of the alley to be vacated.
Engineer Kenworthy responded that all of the site plan information that he has responded to
indicate that access will be available to the site from the east end of the alley, and the City
would be requiring an easem~!1t to ensure that access.will not be hindered through to Lincoln
Street. The Public Works Department will require such through access for site approval and
will not support a dead end alley. Alleys are basically intended for utility purposes and
secondary residential access. They are not meantfor vehicular through traffic. To maintain
the ease of these intended activities, it is preferred not to provide turn arounds but to loop
through those areas.
Chair Reed agreed with the statement that tl1ere have been vacations approved that allowed
larger commercial site developments. as stated by a resident of the neighborhood. This is
true. however, each case is analyzed individually, and would not have been approved ifnot
found to be in the greater public interes~..with sensitivity toward the individual areas
involved. He felt that future access to Ninth Street is protected from the site by condition
No.4. which provides that the vacation will not be finaled until a building permit can be
issued for the entire site, which would eliminate the possibility of the lots adjacent to Ninth
Street being developed independently of the current proposal. Although staff has confirmed
that the intent of alleys is for utility and residential uses, the reality of it is that alleys,
particularly this alley, experiences a much more intensive use. That traffic will be using
Ninth Street if this proposal is approved.
Commissioner Ziakin did not believe th~t the traffic situation/impacts have been analyzed
to everyone's satisfaction. He does not believe the applicant has provided enough
information for approval at this point.
Commissioner Hewins noted that the subject location is one of the most desirable
commercial intersections in town. The properties surrounding the intersection will
eventually be developed in a manner that will inevitably increase the already heavy traffic
~,,~
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 14
in the area, and should be addressed in a serious manner. The City's Comprehensive Plan
establishes the area as a primary commercial area which will result in a major trafffic
corridor. )
.
Commissioner Craver felt that given the testimony verifying that the alley in this location
is heavily travelled by ~ose visiting the~ various commercial uses which occupy the area at
present as well as those using the alley as a frontage road to avoid the intersection
congestion, development of the area from several businesses into one single commercial site
may actually reduce the congestion in the area somewhat. She noted that the applic'ant'.s
testimony indicates that the alley will not be continued through to the parking lot, but the site
information presented for review indicates through access.
'"
Chair Reed again noted that closure of the alley will force the traffic uses to the side streets,
and was not comfortable with that impact.
In response to Commissioner Souders, Planner Sawyer noted that he believes the applicant's
site plans are dependent on the street vacation. Furthermore, he stated that staff would have
difficulty recommending approval of the accompanying rezone proposal without the street
vacation due to the fact that without the added right-of-way area the commercial site would
be bisected by the alley.
Commissioner Nutter moved to deny the proposed street vacation petition citing the
following findings and conclusions:.
Findings:
1.
The applicant for the requested vacation is Northwest Permit. The petition is
attached as Attachment A of the July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for
STY 98-01.
"
2.: The requested vacation is for that portion of the alley between 8th Street and 9th
Street abutting Lots 1-6 and 13-18 0~J310ck No. 268 in the Townsite of Port Angeles.
3. The street vacation is categorically exempt from threshold determination and
Environmental Impact Statement requirements per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the
Washington Administrative Code. c-
4. The subject right-of-way and abutting properties .rall within the undesignated area
between the Comprehensive Plan's Commercial land use designation to the north. and
its Residential desigriation to the south. The majority of the abutting properties are
zoned Commercial Shopping District (CSD) with four of the properties currently
zoned Residential, Single-Family (RS-7).
5.
The Public Works Department has indicated a 24" sanitary sewer main and overhead
electrical lines are located in the alley and will need to be relocated if the vacation
is approved.
.
146
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 15
.
6.
The subject right-of-way is currently improved.
7. The Public Works, Fire, and Police Department's comments are included as
Attachments B, C, and D of the July 8, 1998, Planning Department Staff Report for
STY 98-01.
8. The Police Department originally submitted written public safety concerns related
to the proposed vacation. These concerns include the current use of the alley for
traffic diversion in the event of an accident at the 8th Street arid Lincoln Street
intersection, the use of the alley by officers in response to calls from the bank located
at the comer of 8th Street and Oak Street, and the use of the alley for access to and
observation of the 24 hour retail/gas station use at the comer of 8th Street and
Lincoln Street.
9. At the July 8, 1998, Planning Commission meeting, the Police Department's
concerns were further explained. Deputy Chief Tom Riepe stated that the July 7,
1998, memorandum from the Police Departmentwas intended to point out issues for
consideration but the concerns do not 'warrant denial of the proposed vacation.
Conclusions:
.
A.
The Comprehensive Plan's Utilities and Public Services Policies C2 and 3 and
Transportation PolicyB 18 are the most relevant to the proposed vacation.
B. Based on neighborhood traffic concerns including the use of the alley for public
safety purposes, the proposed vacation is not consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
C. Based on the Police Department's comments and stated use of the altey for public
safety purposes, the Planning ~ommission concludes that the proposed vacation may
have an impact on public health, safety and welfare.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Ziakin and deadlocked 3 - 3, with
Commissioners Reed, Nutter, andZiakin voting for the motion, and Commissioners
Hewins, Craver, and Souders voting against the motion.
Commissioner Hewins stated that he did not believe the vacation will have an adverse impact
on the surrounding neighborhood. Reorientation of traffic patterns in the alley will result in
the direction of traffic through to Eighth Street. The project, not the vacation, may result'in
an increase in traffic to Ninth Street.
Commissioner Craver restated her belief that the consolidation of the uses at this comer may
ease the impact to the neighborhood and the alley.
.
Chair Reed reiterated that his primary reason for voting to deny the vacation is due to the
public testimony that traffic volumes along Ninth Street during rush hour traffic exceeded
that which was ~uggested by the consultant's report and that the proposed vacation would
1'47
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 16
aggravate that situation.
.
When asked to comment on the traffic impact, Engineer Kenworthy again noted that alleys
are not intended or developed for heavy, through traffic use. He is comfortable with the
proposal and vacation ofthe alley subject to the conditions recommended.
The Commission took a short recess at 11 :00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 11 :05 p.m.
The Commission discussed traffic concerns and potential traffic patterns at length.
Commissioner Ziakin noted that he would abstain from voting on the issue because he does
not believe enough information has been presented to vote fairly. Staff responded, at the
direction of the Chair, that the Commissioners should endeavor to vote one way or the other.
If the Commission cannot break a deadlock, the issue would have to be passed on to the City
Council as such.
Engineer Kenworthy responded to Commissioner Hewins that the traffic consultant provided
additional information at his request which concluded that, following their analysis as traffic
engineers, the additional traffic to Ninth and Laurel Streets would not be significant. Mr.
Kenworthy agreed that there will be impacts and increases, but they would not significantly
affect the level of service.
Commissioner Nutter stated that she can't give credence to the traffic engineering study .
prepared by the traffic consultants because it is too vague. Testimony received by the
neighborhood does not support the traffic consultant's conclusions.
Commissioner Souders noted that her vote against the motion was because the facts
presented bystatTin"recommending denial of the vacation cannot be supported without the
Police Department's concerns. Staff noted in the report that if the Police Department's
concerns could be mitigated the recommendation would be for approval.
Commissioner Craver believed that signiticant weight should be given to the traffic
consultant's report because the authors are trained in traffic matters and are professionals
in their field, where the individual Planning Commission members are not traffic experts.
She has to assume that reports presented by specialists in a specific field should be given
particular weight in a final decision.
Commissioner Ziakin believed there are glaring gaps in the information provided.
Chair Reed pointed out the options available at this juncture and encouraged the Commission
to try to forward a clear recommendation to the City Council.
Commissioner Hewins agreed with Commissioner Craver that the requested traffic
information had been provided and the City's, Engineer had reviewed it and agreed .
with the conclusions. He then moved to approve the vacation as proposed citing the
following six conditions, ten findings and four conclusions:
148
.
.
.
',C";:'''I?:;',':< ~::':'(' ,"",".
",.,\":.;:,y);/j:,c,~;;,, <,
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 1998
Page 17
Conditions:
1. The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Public
Works Department (Attachment B qfthe July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff
Report for STY 98-01) which require that a twenty-four inch sanitary sewer main
will need to be relocated. A twenty foot wide access and utility easement shall be
required, ~
2. The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Fire
Department (Attachment C of the July 8, 1998, Planning Department Staff Report
for STY 98-01) whichrequires that through access shall be maintained at the west
end of the vacated Eighth/Ninth alley. The access shall be a minimum of twenty feet
in width and shall consist of an all weather surface meeting the City's Public Works
Department specifications. An approved turn around meeting the City's
specifications may be approved at the east end of the remaining EighthlNinth alley
in lieu of through access.
3. The street vacation shall not be finaled until a building permit is issued for the
property consistent with the revised site development plan (Attachment A to the July
8, 1998, Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-01).
4.
Final occupancy of 3l1rnew structures on the site shall not be allowed until the street
vacation is complete and all of the individual lots comprising the development site
have been combined into one legal building and zoning lot.
5. Any costs associated with utility relocation and alley realignment and/or
improvements shall be borne by the applicant.
Findings:
I. The app.1icant for the requested vacation is Northwest Permit. The petition is
attached as Attachment A of the July,8, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for
STY 98-0 1. .~
2. jThe requested vacation is for that portion of the alley between 8th Street and 9th
Street abutting Lots 1-6 and 13-18 of Block No. 268 in the Townsite of Port Angeles.
3. The street vacation is categorically exempt from threshold determination and
Environmental Impact Statement requirements per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the
Washington Administrative Code.
4.
The subject right-of-way and abutting properties fall within the undesignated area
between the Comprehensive Plan's Commercial land use designation to the north
and its Residential designation to the south. The m.yority of the abutting properties ~
are zoned Commercial Shopping District (CSD) with four of the properties currently
zoned Residential, Single-Family (RS-7).
149
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 18
5.
The Public Works Department has indicated a 24" sanitary sewer main and overhead
electrical lines are located in the alley and will need to be relocated if the vacation
is approved.
.
6. The subject right-of~way is currently improved.
7. The Public Works, Fire, and Police Department's comments are included as
Attachments B,C, and D of the July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for
STY 98-01.
8. The Police Department originally submitted written public safety concerns related
to the proposed vacation. These concerns include the current use of the alley for
traffic diversion in the event of an accident at the 8th Street and Lincoln Street
intersection, the use of the alley by officers in response to calls from the bank located
at the comer of 8th Street and Oak Street, and the use of the alley for access to and
observation of the 24 hour retaiVgas station use at the comer of 8th Street and
Lincoln Street.
9.
As noted in their presentation to the Planning Commission on July 8, 1998, the
Police Department's concerns expressed in a letter dated February 23, 1998, attached
as Attachment D of the July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-
01) do not warrant denial of the proposed vacation.
10.
On May 14, 1998, the Planning Department received a traffic analysis for the
applicant's overall development plan which includes the proposed street vacation.
On June 3, 1998, the Planning Department received an addendum to the analysis with
comments regarding Ninth Street, Laurel Street, and the Eighth and Ninth Streets .
alley.
.
Conclusions:
A. The Comprehensive Plan's Utilitie_~. and Public Services Policies C, 2 and 3 and
Transportation Policy B 18 are the most relevant to the proposed vacation.
B. As conditioned, the proposed vacation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's
Utilities and Public Services Policies C, 2 and 3 and Transportation Policy B 18.
C. As conditioned, the proposed vacation will not have an adverse impact on the public
health, safety and welfare.
D. As conditioned, the proposed vacation will benefit the community's economic
development as well as the general public health, safety and welfare.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Craver and passed 3 - 2 with .
Commissioners Hewins, Souders, and Craver voting in favor, Commissioners Nutter _
and Reed voting in the negative, and Commissioner Ziakin abstained.
150
1----------------------------------------
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 19
Those who voted against the motion restated their original objections, and Commissioner
Ziakin's abstention was due to the desire for additional traffic information.
Chair Reed stated that the City Council will hold a public hearing on this item at its July 21,
1998, meeting, which will begin at 7:00 p.m.
( .
..,
...
151
152
.
.
.
.
.
.
~- -;;'
('
Port Angeles
Police Department
r
Stew Ilk, Chief of Police
Tom RIepe, Deputy Chief
Naomi Wu, Comm Manager
Karen Haugstad, Admin Assistant
, ill rn@rnO\Ylrn OO~
MEMORANDUM
J1. I 3 1998
"
Date: July 13, 1998 PORT ANGELES
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
To:
From:
Re:
Mayor B~~ and Council Members
Tom Ri~puty Chief
Street Vacation - Police Department's Statements To Planning Commission
cc:
Chief S. Ilk
Planning Department
This memo is W1itten at the request of the Planning Department to convey to the Mayor and Council Members
statements made by me (Deputy Chief Tom Riepe) to the Planning Commission on July ~,1998. My statements
were made regarding the "Request for vacation of the alley between 811 Street and 911 Street abutting Lots 1-6 and
13-18 of Block No, 268 in the Townsite of Port Angeles (STV 98-01).
During the July 8, 1998 Planning commission meeting, I informed the Planning Commission that while Sergeant
Turton's memo of February 23, 1998 to the Planning Commission details "public safety concerns. regarding the
vacation of the alley, the concerns, in my opinion, were minimal, and do not cause the Police Department to
recommend denial of the request. I furthertold the Planning Commission words to the effect that, in my opinion, if
the Police Department and public were no longer able to use the alley, per the vacation request, it would not cause
an adverse impact to public safety.
102-98460
. Page 1
153
.
.
"
.
.
154
"."-.'};,
F' I L E:'~:l~
. pLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF ~PORT
.
.
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: ~uming Departmelll
DATE: July 8, 1998
RE: STV 98-01
APPLICANT: Northwest Pennit
REQUEST: Vacation of the alley bc:twecn 8th Street and 9th Street abutting Lots 1-6 and
13-18 of Block No. 268 in the Townsite of Port Ange~es.
BACKGROUND:
This vacation request is part of the applicant's overall proposal to develop 90.000 s.f. of the
southwest comer of Lincoln Street and 8th Street (extending to 9th Street) with an approximately
17.000 sf retail store. The overall proposal includes this street vacation request and a rezone request
for a ponion of the property.
DISCUSSION:
..
'..
Environmental Review:
. I .
The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from threshold determination and Environmental
Impact Statement requirements per Section 197-11-800 (2)(h) of the Washington Administrative
Code (W AC) which .states "(2) Other minor new construe/ion. The following types of construction
shall be exempt. . . \ (h) The vacation of streets or roads."
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance:
The subject right-or-way and adjoining properties fall within theundesignated area between the
Comprehensive Plan's Commercial land use designation to the north and its Residential designation
to the south. The majority of the abutting properties are zoned Commercial Shopping District (CSD)
with four of the properties currently zoned Residential, Single-Family (RS- 7).
,
155
City a/Port Angeles Planning Department, 321 E. jlh St., Port Angeles, WA, (voi~) 360-417-47jO, (fax) 360-417-4609
3-11-=1
P1aDDiDs Deputmart Staff'Report
S1V 98-01 - Northwest Permit
July 8, 1998
Pap 2
The following Comprehensive Plan policies have been found to be most relevant to the proposal:
Utilities and Public Services Policy C 2: All new ~/ity services should be underground
Utilities and Public Services Policy 4 J: Where poSsible. new utilities should be located
in alleys.
.
. The.Public Works Department has noted the location of utilities in the requested vacation
area and iecommended specific conditions of approval that include required utility easement
and relocation.
Transportation Policy B, 18: Po/ice andfire protectionshou/d be a key factor in residential
subdivision street designs and circulation panems.
The area's current zoning is a combination of commercial and residential zones. The Fire
Department has indicated they do not have an objection to this request subject to the
development of an approved turn-around at the proposed east end of 8th/9th Street alley.
The Police Depanment has expressed several public safety concerns related to the proposed
vacation. These concerns include the current use of the alley for traffic diversion in the event
of an accident at the 8th Street and Lincoln Street intersection. the use of the alley by officers
in response to calls from the bank located at the comer of 8th Street and Oak Street. and the .
use of the alley for access to and observation of the 24 hour retai1Igas station use at the comer
of 8th Street and Lincoln Street.
Depanment Reviews and Comments:
Pllhllc Works Department:
The Public Works Department's comments address necessary utility easement and relocation
requirements (please see Attachment B). ..
F,rt' Departmellt:
The rare Depanment's comments which address the need for adequate turn-around facilities
are attached as Attachment C.
Police Department:
The Police Department's comments which express concerns regarding public safety are
attached as Attachment D. A representative of the Police Department has been asked to be
available at the Plarming Commission meeting to answer any questions the Commission may
have regarding their concerns. .
156
C/~' of Port Angeles Planning Department. 321 E. 5th St., POri Angeles. WA. (voice) 360-417-4750. (fax) 360-417-4609
P1amUDa ~ Staft"Rcpart
STV ~1 - Northwest Permit
July 8. 1998
Pap 3
.
Planning Department:
Below is a summary of the impacts of the proposal:
Traffic P~ems: The Public Works Department has not indicated any negative impact on the area's
vehicular traffic pattern as a result of the proposed vacation. . ..
Utilities: The Public Works Department has indicated a 24" sanitary sewer majn and overhead..
electrical lines are located in the alley and win need to be relocated if the vacation is approved. The
Planning Department also notes that the City's Compreherisive Plan states new utilities should be
underground and this policy should be applied to this proposal.
Public Health, Safety and Welfare: As noted previously, the Police Department has stated the area
of the proposed vacation is used by thepblice for a variety of public safety purposes.
II, .',
Development Patterns: The proposed vacation is located in an area of currently developed lots which
should not have further development affected by the proposed vacation.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
. Based on the Police Department's co~ei1tS and stated use of the alley for public saf~ty purposes,
the Planning Department recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of denial
to the City Council for street vacation request STY 98-01 based on the following findings and
conclusions
Findings:
The applicant for the requested vacation is Northwest Pennit, the applicati~n/petition
is attached as Attachment A of the July 8, 1998 Planning Depanment Staff Repon for
STV 98-01. ._ ,-
-..
,
J
2 The requested vacation is for that portion of the alley between 8th Street and 9th
Street abutting Lots 1-6 and 13-18 of Block No. 268 in the Townsite ofPon Angeles.
3 The street vacation is categorically exempt from threshold determination and
Environmental Impact SWement requirements per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the
Washington Administrative Code.
4.
The subject right-of-way and abutting properties fall within the undesignated area
between the Comprehensive Plan's Commercial land use designation to the north and
its Residential designation to the south. The majority of the abutting properties are
zoned Comm~cial Shopping District (CSD) with four of the properties currently
zoned Residential, Single-Family (RS~7).
.
s.
The Public Works Department has indicated 8"24" sanitary sewer main and overhead
157
City of PorI Angtlts Planning Dtpartmtnl. 32 J E. Sth 51.. PorI Angtlts. WA. (voict) 360-4 J 7-4750. (fax) 360-4 J 7-4609
Plam:UDs DepartmcDt Std'Repad
S1V 98-01 - Northwest Permit
July 8. 1998
Paso 4
electrical lines are located in the alley and will need to be relocated if the vacation is
approved.
6. The subject right-of-way is currently improved.
7. The Public Works, Fire, and Police Department's comments are included as
Attacmnents B, C, and D of the JUly 8..1998 Planriing Depanment Staff Report for
STV 98-01. \ . .
8. The Police Department expressed several public S2d"ety concerns related to the
proposed vacation. These concerns include the current use of the alley for traffic
diversion in the event of an accident at the 8th Street and Lincoln Street intersection,
the use of the alley by officers in response to calls from the bank located at the comer
of 8th Street and Oak Street, and the use of the alley for access to and observation of
the 24 hour retaiVgas station use at the comer of 8th Street and Lincoln Street.
Conclusions
A. The Comprehensive Plan's Utilities and Public Services Policies C, 2 and 3 and
Transportation Policy B18 are the most relevant to the proposed vacation.
B.
Based on the Police Depanment's comments and stated use of the alley for public
safety purposes, the proposed vacation is not consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan's Transport~tion Policy B18.
C Based on the Police Depanment' s comments and stated use of the alley for public
safety purposes, the p~oposed vacation will have an adverse impact on the. public
health. safety and welfare.
,..,If the Pobce Depanment's concerns can be mitigated tOJhe point that the proposed vacation will not
result in an adverse impact on the public health. safety'and welfare, the Planning Depanment would
rerommend the Planning Commission foward to the City Council a recommendation of approval
subject to cenain conditions of approval rather than the present recommendation of denial
SlV9IOI.PCI
City of PorI Ang~/~s Planning Departmml. 311 E. 5IhSl.. PortAng~/~s. WA. (voice) 360-417-4750. (far) 360-417-4609
.
.
.
"
158
I
,
I
e
, TO: ",e City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington-
(
CI7Y OF PORT ANGELES
STREET VACATION PE'11TION
$2CO ~<,:'I
. ~;:)d ci<1t 19
ORIGINAL
, Come now the undersigned petitioners and pursuant tQ Chapter 35'.79 RCW respectfully show:
I. 'The undersigned petitioners request that the following deScribed portion of ALl e. 'Y
Street/A Hey in the City of Port Angeles be vacated pursuant to, Chapter 35.79 RCW (legally describe the
property requested for vacation below).
ihe. -6o.5'T\"e,.\~ 3,00 bee\:" Db .or-\\e '1 ~.,...:)C~Q~~. slk-s-rft,.
z. 'il7: s-~e. '- t);:~::tX:)"U'I~~~. L\",c. oLt.'I:::l ~\. ~~e- ~':);-n....
J.. c1 ~ i - ~ ..,..- 13 - IS" o~..:l.L' J- TPI1
2. ~ach of the undersigned petitioners is the owner of an interest in real estate abutting on the above
described area.
3.
~ persons own property abutting on said area.
4,
The names and addresses of property owners abutting on said areas are as follows:
~ Add~s
.J:u..c-L bc..v",", 1A.)e-\ \ 1 \ ca ~ ~ I PcriT Pv-..~P. ~ t;. lA.)Pr
.~ t"\CA t!- ~J'"",~\ \ -5c.... ..-- ~
\
bbef'L ~e.(' '''V'V, N ~rv-..P
.): "
roo
-'.~
5 ' . , The undersigned petitioners constitute more than two thirds of the owners of said ,aouuing
prope" y
Name Address
}(~L ~r.ll'rt'\ ~\~ ,\ 8 8~,~. ~elo ~
. ~ n~ ~ :SC4-L>n.l~l ' ~'---..-. p
~~Z:::~ .' ~~ --
. ; / ; /7"/;-111" /] .-/13/4 <:~_. .-.
e:.". - ~ '/1, -( ~- 1 '... ~ ~' J'J'-J;ia.ftJ'r~::C.r:C
~/
g -0 ',.. *' f>.... 0 ... e.. ~ ',50 C c.. r e. OL ,to, "t e",-':::- -b n.-
OateReceiv :.f \~, '.'1.'::":: "--f\.::lt""c..""~.s.eA.-/o~ Nc:..rS ~ ~.VO .-=?~ r f'V"\'~
liearmg(s) Oat - -'. --r- ~ \.b(," c..r... h L. -T-\ "" r-C-
10/- -9Y
Ehone
.ZOfo .3.~}:,Q~33' ~
"~,, ~ \ , . , - -
15n
1\
r
Memorandum
To: Deborah Lyn;lt"Han. N. W. Permit
From: Allen KalIn. Boardwalk Development
Date: 01/27198
Re: Authorization to Northwest Permit
This Memorandum is intended as authorization to Northwest Permit to apply
and process permits on behalf of us for the property legally described as
follows:
Lots 17-18, Block 268, TCMnsite of Port Angeles, WA
If you have any questions, please feel tree to call me on 314-966-2300. Your
assistance is appreciated.
Very Truly Yours,
BOARDWALKD~PMENT
ft~
~!~.L~
~ .
~~'lr
~.
~.
Allen Kann
Executive Vice President
.
I .
.
.
1
160
f' ~
,-----
.
.
.
't-21-1_ S......
........ .-raIL..."..... sa ...
,..,. 21. I'"
Mr. ...... O. Oav
CV Mr.IooIt"" __ .
"'-111 ..... ... .. LeIL
.. Uw1..~.., ... .... "12
II., W."101
k. .~~_
... V.... Awl.-
LoCI 11.11
8IDc:t211. T.... .....- fIIhtA..,da WA.
0.. Bob:
'TNt.......... .~. p.nIi1lioD- "'WIlt ~ c,...-.
.-Not ~ ID......... JISII'''''''' ~klll..ltlWtV~ ~ .-
GIller doc -..........,,!be cttr~" ~,.... iII.-i__"1Ie
~~r*....... .~"lr. - ootWIifttll tell. 17.11.1Uect _ TIl'Iil.Aille., PM
MpIu, WA. .
Ifn~.Ii>.
;( ..J.I'/. C3 ~.._.~
JtIrt ....,
~~
Iaer- .........rJ
"
~.2
161
^-z.
'--''''..-"";''
..... .......
~: ;':'-..,:':"t:. .~!...: ~;_....-
January 19. 1998
Mr. Scott Grainger
Northwest Retail P~ners. Ltd. (
600 University St.~ Suite 3012
Seattle; W A 98101
Rc: Rezone Application
Street Vacation Application
Lots 1-6 inclusive, Lots 13-16 inclusive
Block 268, Townsite of Pon Angeles. W A.
Dear Scott:
__J
(
This letter shall serve as Owner'spcnnission to Boardwalk Develo~ent, its agents
and/or assigns to file the necessary Rezone Application. Street Vacation Application, and
other docwncn1ation as requested by the city of Port Angeles in association with the
proposed retail development occurring at Lots 1-6 inclusive, Lots 13-16 inclusive
Block 268. Townsite ofPon Angeles, WA.
Sincerely.
;t)I~
Roben f' German
1\ B B-
f~u:-~~s,
)
w~
tJ$)(.)-
.. . .
(
"
162
" L1
.
.
I
I.
.
;'
(
"
.
OTY OF PORT ANGELES
PUBUC WORKS
~
SCALE
AREA MAP ^
STREET VACATION (STV 98-01)
LOTS 1-6 &13-18 BL. 268 A 5"
100
( j I
50
"..'i',..'~' '
',. ....,. ,
, -",.... _ '. 'a
.., . :,:',:;;;
G
II "
163
/ 164
.
.
.
.
.
.
("
February 25, 1998
TO:.
From:
SUBJ:
.
.
.
.
Tim Smith
Gary Kenworthy
Trenia Funston{r
(
ill ~~~2D~~ ill
. PORTANGElES .."
PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
STREET VACATION PEllll0N-STV 98"()1
BAUMWELL / GERMAN
Easterly 300' of the 8/9 Alley,between Lincoln and Laurel'.Streets
The existing 8/9 alley between Lincoln and Laurel Streets presently has a 24" sanitary
sewer main which will need to relocated. A 20' wide utility easement will be required
for access.
Provide a 20' wide Access easement from 8/9 alley North to 8th Street.
Block 268 Assessed land values:
South side 8th Street Liaeola to Laurel
North 80' Lots 1 and 2
South 60' Lots I and 2 and Lots 3-5
Lots 6-8 and tbe S60' Lot 9
North 80' Lot 9
North side 9th Street Liacom to Laurel
Lots 17-18
Lots 14-16
'Lots 12-13
North 90' Lots 1 0-] 1
South SO' Lots] 0-] ]
Block 267 Assessed values:
South side 8th Street Laurel to Oak
Lots 1 -2, 3-4
Lots 5-7 Church
Lot 8
Lots 9-10
North side of 9th Street Laurcl to Oak
Lots 1 J -20
S9.00SF
S8.00SF
S8.00SF
S4.00SF
l'
S6.50SF
S2.5 ] SF
S3.]4SF
S2.5] SF
S3.J4SF
S6.50SF
o
S6.50SF
$6.50SF
SJ.14SF
lSfl
A TrAC.. ~ME~ ~ \
,
(
('
,..;:~~.....
.... ""~
.:..'_..'
~.
. Block 269 Assessed values: e
South side 8th Street Lincoln to Chase
Lots 1-2 S8.00SF
Lots 3-5 S8.00SF
Lots 6-9 S 13.50SF
North side of 9th Street Lineoln to Chase
Lots 10 and portions of Lot 11 S8.00SF
. . Block 231 Assessed values:
North Side 8th Street Lincoln to Laurel I I.'
Lots JO-15 S8.00SF
Lot 16 and South 99' Lots J 7.,J 8 S8.59SF
. Block 232 Assessed values:
North sidc 8th Street Laurel to Oak
Lots 1 J - J 4 Church 0
Lots 15-20 S6.50SF
. Block 230 Assessed values:
North side 8th Street Lincoln to Chase
Lots 1-12 S8.67SF
Lots 13-18 S8.00SF e
.-
.'
e'
166
KL
VJ
uJ
~---~.. _.......
~
CT>
'9
J'
r
r
PLANNING DEPA.RTMENT MEMORANDUM
32/ East Fifth Street. Port AIlKe/es. WashillKloll (360) -1/7-1750
.
-
TO
~mith. Public Works Depanment
Fire Depanment
Police Depanment
. PORT ANGELES .
PLANNING DfPARTMENT
February 16, 1998.
SL"BJ STREET VACATION PETITIO~ - STY 98-01
BAUMWELUGERMAN - 8/9 Alley between Lincoln and Laurel Streets
The Planning Depanment has received a petition for vacation ofa ponion of the 8/9 alley between
Lmcoln and Laurel Streets. Please review the petition and identify those issues that relate to your
depanmental concerns. A response to the Planning Depanment no later than Februarv 27. 1998, .
IS apprecIated Please be sure to note any concerns your depanments have with regard to .
compliance with the City's LOS standards should the vacation be approvec:i.
If\'ou have any questions. please call or stop by the depanment. Thank you.
~1 w 1 LA- ~ tJ e. C,~5 Atzy"le> ~f:.W\/)\J r::.... "to e:.X\ oS Ti ~<?)
OJG:(U-leA-D rov.J~tJe.- l~ 1l'~.~'~Yo~f?- A~ VACA"170,J.
lite 1i>u.>e:a.lA,Jf, CIs0 ~f.;. rz,DN\?lIU 1ttJ1 UI;1I IJ6J ~ ~l ~
~~. A ~'l ~rltV1A-re:-J P"- Ph'? vJOM-M
~ <41L/~,j ro MlJWAIJ#JYPA(t.,,J~Hlf, A-t.C.H(~.
Cf1-~
~p.~llJtf6eI~ .
-Sf~AU~YE
rie1ZV~ t3/ /'1q~
168
MEMORANDUM
Coral Wheeler
Administrative Assistant
ext 4650
~e W. Becker
"Fire Chief
ext 4651
Daniel K. McKeen
FIre Marshal
ext 4653
L. Keith Sogues
TraIning Officer
ext 4652
James B.(Duke) Moroz
MedICal Officer
ext 4665
360~ 17 -4655
.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
'<.t'i'.-i~""'\'"'
,~<.,~Y",'-" )~~~':':~
i
r
ROU'1'B TOI
Building Dept. IJ
PlaDlling Dept. if
Public Works IJ
Ci ty Manager IJ
February 23, 1998
'fD) IE m u w ~rn1
UlJ FEB 2 4 !IIJ [!!)
If '.
Plann~ng Department
PORT ANGElES
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
Dan McKeen, Fire Marshal
Street Vacation Petition - STV 98-01
Baumwell/German 8/9 Alley between
Lincoln and Laurel Streets
The Fire Department has reviewed the request for a
street vacation for a portion of the 8/9 alley
between Lincoln and Laurel Street, and has the
following condition:,
DM/cw
Through access shall be maintained at the west
end of the vacated 8/9 alley. The access shall
be a minimum of-"'20 feet in width and shall
consist of an all-weather surface meeting City
of Port ~geles Public Works specifications.
In lieu of through access, an approved turn-a-
round meeting City of Port Angeles Public
Works specifications can be provided at the
east end of the remaining 8/9 alley.
FP - 26
Page 1 of 1
169
/""
. ."~
. .-
170
"''-1
' ~:~ ::':.'.:,\' ,,; :
',\..t1
.
.
.
('
Port An......
. Police Departme.nt
Me"""'m
PORT ANGELfS
. PlANNING DEPARTMENT
..... t:NII ell'lIIIce
f.......~t:NII
".,.,. Mt,1WICom....,.,
IWwt MIl _ r" l(..............
SllWMct.Ma s....-
JIm ....,.... s....-
GIM TU1lln. s....-
&let z.,pey. s....-
Ten)' 9.-.p. s....-
UI ZInonlIn. ~ S&lPIMIOr
0...,.."."., ~ ~
IfMIHIIftOI1. ~ S&fIIMIOr
Ii) IEIwm~
lJ1) FEB 2 4 1998 W
Date:.
02123198
PLANNING' DEPARTMENT
I .
To:
Distribution: laJ Addressee Only IIlJ Post II Operations II CommunIcations . II Records PQ Administration
From: Gale TurtonlSgt Port Angeles Poltce
.217 -G001.98
Subject:
Street Vacation Petltlon-STV 98-G1
After reviewing the application for vacation of. portion of the alley between 8th and 9th Streets, south side of
8th Street, west of Uncoln, I have .everal "public safety concerns".
The intersection of 8th and Uncoln Streets i. a major intersection in the City. AccIdents at this location are difficult
to safely investigate without the use of the alleys to divert traffic. The only alley that is usable In an east/west
.direCtiOn is the alley on the south side of 8th Strwet. The alley on the north .Ide of 8th Street does not continue
41st bound,
There is a bank located at 8th and Oak Streets. Officers responding to problems at that location who are located
south of 8th Street would respond north bound on Uncoln Street turning west bound in the alley to the area of
the bank.
The Areo AMlPM is located at the comer of 8th and Uncoln Streets. This Is a 2. hour business and with problems
that ':8qulre. police response, the alley west of Uncoln Street Is a prefect location for Officers to observe the
store. -
.
171
Page 1
~ -n-n ~ u ~f\ -:-= "-..1 ~ b
-":,.
..:,,"~
~!
.
I .
.
..
'.'
.
172
.
.
.
:-
~
t L E
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
PLANN\~G
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Planning Department
DATE:
July 8, 1998
RE:
STY 98-01
APPLICANT:
Northwest Permit
REQUEST:
Vacation of the alley between 8th Stteet and 9th Street abutting Lots 1-6 and
13-18 of Block No. 268 in the Townsite of Port Angeles.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION
Based on the Police Department's concerns being adequately mitigated, the Planning Department
recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council
for street vacation request STY 98-01 subject to the following conditions of approval and based on
I the following findings and conclusions:
Conditions of Approval:
1.
The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations' of the City's Public
Works Department included in .Attachment Bof the July 8, 1998 Planning
Department Staff Report for STY 98-0 I.
.,
The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Fire
Department included in Attachment C of the July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff
Report for STY 98-0 I.
..,
-'.
The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Police
Department as presented to the Planning Commission at their meeting of July 8,
1998.
4.
The street vacation shall not be finaled until a building permit is issued for the
propeny consistent with the revised site development plan attached as Attachment
A to the July 8,1998 Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-02.
173
tin' of Port A nKeles Planning Departmelll. 32/ E. 5th St.. Port Angeles. W A. (voice) J 60-4/7 -4750. (faxl 360-4/7-4609
Planning Department Staff Repon Alternative Rcommendation
STY 98-01 - Nonhwest Permit
July 8, 1998
Page, 2
5.
Final occupancy of any new structures on the site shall not be allowed until the street .
vacation is complete and aJl of the individual lots comprising the1development site
have been combined into one legal building and zoning lot.
6. Any costs associated with utility relocation. and alley realignment and/or
improvements shall be borne by the applicant.
Findings:
L The applicant for the requested vacation is Northwest Permit, the application/petition
is attached as Attachment A of the July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report
for STY 98-01.
2. The requested vacation is for that portion of the alley between 8th Street and 9th
Street abutting Lots 1-6 and 13-18 of Block No. 268 in the Townsite of Port Angeles.
3. The street vacation is categorically exempt from threshold determination and
Enviromnental Impact Statement requirements per Settion 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the
Washington Administrative Code.
,
4.
The subject right-of-way and abutting properties fall within the undesignated area
between the Comprehensive Plan's Commercial land use designation to the north and
its Residential designation to the south. The majority of the abutting properties are
zoned Commercial Shopping District (CSD) with four of the properties currently
zoned Residential, Single-Family (RS:-7).
~. ..
"....',.. .:
...~
.
.
.-\s noted in their presentation to the Planning Commission on July 8. 1998. the
Police Department's concerns expressed in their letter dated February 23, 1998, and
attached as Attachment D of the July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for
STY 98-01 have been adequately mitigated to their satisfaction.
City oj Port Angeles Planning Department. 321 E. 5th St., Port Angeles. WA, (voice) 360-4/7-4750. (fax) 360-4/7-4609 174
5. The Public Works Department has indicated a24" sanitary sewer main and overhead
electrical lines are located in the alley. and will need to be relocated if the vacation.
is approved.
6. The subject right-of-way is currently improved.
7. The Public Works, Fire, and Pciiice Department's comments are included as
Attachments B. C. and D of the July 8.1998 Planning Department Staff Report for
STY 98-01.
8. The Police Department expressed several public safety concerns related to the
proposed vacation. These concerns include the current use of the alley for traffic
diversion in the event of an accident at the 8th Street and Lincoln Street intersection,
the use of the alley by officers in response to calls from the bank located at the corner
of 8th Street and Oak Street, and the us~ of the alley for access to and observation of
the 24 hour retail/gas station use at the corner of 8th Street and Lincoln Street.
9.
.
.
.
.
':,'".
Planning Department Staff Report A!tl...lative Rcommendation
STY 98-01 - Northwest Permit
July 8, 1998
Page 3
10.
On May 14, 1998, the Planning Department received a traffic analysis for the
applicant's overall development plan which includes the proposed street vacation.
On June 3, 1998, the Planning Department received an addendum to the analysis with
comments regarding 9th Street, Laurel Street, and the 8th and 9th Streets alley.
Conclusions
A.
The Comprehensive Plan's Utilities and 'Public Services Policies C, 2 and 3 and
Transportation Policy B 18 are the most relevant to the proposed vacation.
I .
B. As conditioned, the proposed vacation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's
Utilities and Public Services Policies C, 2 and 3 and Transportation Policy B 18.
C. As conditioned, the proposed vacation will not have an adverse impact on the public
health, safety and welfare.
D. As conditioned, the proposed vacation will benefit the community's economic
development as well as the general public health, safety and welfare.
STV980l.PC2
175
.'
City of Port Angeles Planning Department, 321 E. 5th St., Port Angeles. WA, (voice) 360-417-4750. (fax) 360-4 J 7-4609
'-
176
.
.
.
.6
"Maintaining
and building
a better
commun.ity"
Jack Plttfs
Director [4801J
Phyllis Rasler
Administrative
Assistant [48ooJ
. Cata Rlnehal1
Administrative
Assistant [47ooJ
Bob Titus
Deputy Director [4701J
Ken Ridout
Deputy Director [4802J
Gary Kenworthy
City Engineer [4803J
Jim Harper
El6ctrlcal Engineer
[4702J
Tim Smith
~tract &. ProjBCt
~,_nlstrator {4804J
Lou HaeIInlen
Sr. Building Inspector
{4816J
Tom Sperllne
Sr. El6ctrlcallnspector
. {4735J
Scott MCLain
Power Manager [4703J
Ralph EIJswoI1h
Wal8r, Wast8wal8r
Collection
Superlnlendent {48SSJ
Pete BulT8tt
Equip. S8Mces
Superlnlendent [4835J
Mane S~
LIght OperatJons
Manager [4731 J,
Kevin Curtts
Tmat Plant
Supervisor. [4845J
Tom McCabe
SW CoIl6ctlon
Supervisor [4876J
Stew Evans
fndflll Supervisor
73J
\19 Wilcox
Street Maintenance
- Supervisor [4825J
. '.\ ,.
X / t../UJ..,:v ~
MEMORANDUM
AUGUST 4, 1998
MANAGER IBARRA, MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
JACK PITTIS, DIRECTOR PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES
SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR ACCEPTANCE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY WASTE
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATION: Jefferson County Commissioners have accepted the
fee proposal of $31.50 per ton for disposal of their municipal solid waste at our landfill. We
recommend that the City Council take the following actions: 1 )adopt the attached
ordinance which will permit the acceptance of Jefferson County municipal solid waste
at our landfill and 2)authorize the Mayor to sign attached interlocal agreement with
Jefferson County.
ISSUE: Should the City enter into an agreement with Jefferson County allowing and
establishing the rate for their disposal of municipal solid waste in our landfill?
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: At the last City Council meeting the City Council indicated that
they would accept Jefferson County solid waste at the landfill for a 7 month period provided
the tipping fee was $31.50 per ton and that an acceptable agreement was developed. That
offer was delivered to Jefferson County and on July 27th I received a verbal acceptance of our
$31.50 per ton rate from Frank Hall of Jefferson County.
The City Attorney has prepared the attached ordinance which allows for the acceptance of
Jefferson County municipal solid waste at the landfill and an interlocal agreement with
Jefferson County. This agreement is consistent with the form of the other agreements that we
have with other solid waste haulers, although due to special circumstances and the short term
needs of Jefferson County, the rate is one half of the current commercial hauler rate.
JNP:jp
Disk: N:\PWKS\SWASTE\LANDFILL\JEFFCO\CCJEFCO.804
File: Solid Waste Landfill -
Attachments: ordinance, Interlocal Agreement
Copy:
177
.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, establishing a
new sanitary landfill rate classification for disposal of solid waste from
other governmentally owned solid waste utilities and amending
Ordinance 2317 as amended and Chapter 13.56 of the Port Angeles
Mun,icipal Code.
ORDINANCE NO.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Ordinance 2317, as amended, and Chapter 13.56 of the Port Angeles
Municipal Code are hereby amended by adding a new Section 13.56.043 to read as follows:
13 56.043 Governmental Solid Waste Utility Rate. Landfill disposal by other
governmentally owned solid waste utilities shall be at the rate established by interlocal agreement
between the City and such other governmentally owned solid waste utility.
Section 2 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after the date of.
publication.
PASSED by the City Counci I of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
C~uncil held on the _ day of
, 1998.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary
9\1.14
.
- 1 -
178
.
.
.
s::,x:,'~
..'<4'.
'-'i
t-',"
oJ
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BElWEEN THE
CITY OF PORT ANGELES AND JEFFERSON COUNTY
\ FOR DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE AT THE
Port Angeles Landfill
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT in made and entered into this _ day of
- , 1998 by and between the City of Port ~geles, a non-charier code city of the
State of Washington (hereinafter called the "City"), and Jefferson County, a political subdivision
of the State of Washington (hereinafter called the "County").
WHEREAS, in lieu of long hauling its s<?lid waste to a regional landfill, the County has
proposed disposing of its solid waste at the Port Angeles Landfill at a rate slightly reduced from
what the County would have to pay for long hauling; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City and its landfill customers to accept the
County's solid waste at a special reduced rate for a limited period of time in order to help fund
closure and post closure activities as required by state and federal law and thereby ultimately
reduce the burden on existing and future customers of the Port Angeles Landfill for such costs;
and -
WHEREAS, the City and the County have in good faith negotiated this interlocal
agreement for the disposal of solid waste in the Port Angeles Landfill;
NOW, THEREFORE, in, consideration of the above-representations and the terms,
conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows:
I. Definitions.
For the purposes of this agreement, the folloWing terms shall have the following meanings:
I. 1 "Acceptable waste" meaDs all putrescible and non-putrescible waste delivered to
the Port Angeles Landfill in the area designated by the City, including but not limited to garbage,
rubbish, refuse, ashes, paper, cardboard, and other solid waste that is normally disposed of by and
originating from the occupants of residential dwelling units and commercial establishments in the
area served by the County. The term lIacceptable waste" includes materials and substances that
are authorized to be deposited in the Port Angeles Landfill in accordance'with Title 13 of the Port
Angeles Municipal Code but does not include materials and substances that are prohibited from
disposal in the Port Angeles Landfill by Title 13 P AMC and does not include lIunacceptable
wastell as defined in this agreement.
- 1 -
179
~
I
1.2 "Hazardous waste" means any waste, material, or substance, the processing or
disposing of which would subject County or City to liability under or would otherwise
contravene:
.
a. Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42
U. S. C. 6901 et seq, as amended, and regulations promulgated thereunder;
b. The Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.c. 2601 et seq, as amended,
and'regulations promulgated thereunder;
c. The Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act of 1980,42 U.S.c. 9601 et seq, as amended, and regulations promulgated thereunder;
d. Chapters 70.015 or 70.105D RCW as amended, and regulations
promulgated thereunder; or
e. Any other federal or state law or regulation governing the treatment,
storage, handling, or disposal of solid waste or hazardous or dangerous waste, materials,
or substances. "
1.3 "Unacceptable waste" means:
a. Waste that may not be disposed at the Port Angeles Landfill under any
applicable state, federal or local law , regulation, rule, code, pennit or permit
condition; or f
.
b. Hazardous waste; or
c. MSW ash; or
d. Any other waste expressly excluded from acceptable waste.
2. Tenn of Contract.
The tenn of this contract shall commence on August 14, 1998 and shall continue until
March IS, 1999 or until such additional time as the parties may agree by a written amendment
extending this contract for an additional period based on mutually acceptable tenns and
conditions.
3. Consideration.
County shall pay City the sum of $3 1.50 for each ton of acceptable waste delivered to the
.
- 2-
180
.
.
.
";. (.--:; ';';!-\*J?:,"._~t"!i ~
Port Angeles Landfill at the area designated by the City pursuant to this contract.
4. Payment Procedure.
The City shall bill the County each 'month for the amount of services used by the County.
The County shall make payment in full to the City within thirty days of receipt of the invoice from
the City.
5.
Weighing of Waste.
I .
The City shall weighthe waste of the County using certified scales. Tare weights from the
City's scales will be acceptable in detennining the net weight of solid waste delivered to the
Landfill. The net weight from the City's scale tickets shall be the basis for billing under this
contra6t. The City shall keep a copy of all tare weight slips on file for three months. The tare
slips shall be made available to the County for audit upon request. Tare slips shall be signed by
the truck driver upon leaving the City's landfill. .
6. Operating Hours.
The City shall accept solid waste from the County at the Port Angeles Landfill during the
regular business hours as specified from time to time by the City.
7.
Indemnification/hold harmless.
The County agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses, and costs, including,. but
not limited to, attorney's fees and litigation costs, arising out of or in connection with the
performance of this agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of
the City.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to'RCW
4.24.115, then, in the event ofliability for damages .~sing out of bodily injury to persons or
damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the County and the
City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the County's liability hereunder shall be
only to the extent of the County's n~gligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood
that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the County's waiver of immunity under
Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver
has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the
expiration or tennination of this contract. '
,
The. City agrees to indemnify and hold the Courity, its officers, agents and employees
harmless from all suits, claims or liability of any nature including but not limited to, attorney's
fees, costs, and exp~nses, for or on account of injuries or damages sustained by any persons or
- 3 -
181
property resulting from the acts or omissions of the City, its agents or employees in connection .
with the administration and implementation of this agreement.
8. Venue.
The venue of any state court litigation brought under this agreement shall be Clallam
County Superior Court. "
9. Assignment.
Neither party may assign, transfer or otherwise vest another company, entity or person any
of its rights or obligations under this contract without the prior written consent of the other party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Contract as of the day
and year first written above.
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF CUMMISSIONERS
CITY (City of Port Angeles)
.
GLENN HUNTINGFORD, CHAIRMAN
GARY BRAUN, MAYOR
DANIEL HARPOLE, MEMBER
RICHARD WOIT, MEMBER
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
CLERK OF THE BOARD
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM
APPROVED AS TO FORM
DEPUTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
CITY ATTORNEY
A \WASTa.CON
.
-4-
182
.
City Manager's
Office
Memorandum
PaUlek Ibarra
City Manager
. Sharon "Sam" Martin
Exec. Admin. Asst.
Beck'y J Upton. CMC
City Clerk/}"1anagement Asst.
Boh Coons
Hwnan Resources Manager
CamIlle Hcadnek
Hwnan Resources Asst.
.
":"
July 31, 1998
TO: Manager Ibarra, Mayor Braun and City Council Members
FROM: Bob Coons, Human Resources Manager ~ ~
RE:
Adding Aetna Life Insurance and Annuity Company to our providers for
deferred compensation
Issue: Should the City of Port Angeles add Aetna Life Insurance and Annuity Company
to the list of providers for the deferred compensation plan?
Background: Currently, three companies offer deferred compensation plans to City
employees. One of these companies, American Express, has notified the City that it will
no longer offer this service. Aetna Life Insurance Company has been selected to replace
American Express.
Several years ago, when the City expanded its deferred compensation plan from one to
three, Aetna was a strong finalist. It is still a well-run company and very competitive in
the financial market.
Recently, staff met with representatives of Aetna and confirmed its high level of service
and investment options. If the City Council approves the attached resolution, we will
add Aetna to the International City Managers' Association and Great West Life as
providers for the City's deferred compensation plans. There a~eno fees or charges to
the City to add Aetna as one of the providers.
An additional reason to adct Aetna is because our newly hired City Manager has an
established deferred compensation account with Aetna from his previous employer. This
addition will allow him to transfer his funds to the City of Port Angeles.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached
resolution establishing Aetna Life Insurance and Annuity Company as a provider for the
City's deferred compensation plan under IRS Sections 457 and 401(a).
/ {5...DN
,I
tl
.
.
.
-
->,.,!~
"1
}
.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Port Angeles, Washington, relating to a Deferred
Compensation plan under IRS regulations 401(a)
and 457.
WHEREAS, the City has employees rendering valua~le services; and
WHEREAS, the establishment of a deferred compensation plan benefits employees by
providing funds for retirement and funds for their beneficiaries in the event of death; and
WHEREAS, as the Internal Revenue Service provides regulations to establish deferred
compensation plans for public employees under Sections 457 and 401(a);
NOW, TIffiREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles
that the City of Port Angeles hereby establishes a deferred compensation plan (the Plan) in the
.
form of the Aetna Life Insurance and Annuity and Company pursuant to the specific provisions
of the Variable Annuity Contract and the City's Deferred Compensation Plan Document (copy
attached hereto), which Plan shall be maintained for the exclusive benefit of eligible employees and
their beneficiaries; and
BE IT FURTIIER RESOLVED that the City hereby .executes the Aetna Variable Annuity
Contract establishing a 457 and a 401 (aYDeferred Compensation Plan; and
BE IT FURTIIER RESOLVED that the City hereby agrees to serve as trustee under the
Plan Document; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City's Human Resources Manager shall be the
coordinator of the Plan; shall receive necessary reports, notices, etc., from Aetna Deferred
Insurance Company; and
.
'i'
J."
~
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City hereby authorizes Robert Coons, Hum~
Resources Manager, to execute all necessary agreements with the Aetna Life Insurance and
Annuity Company incidental to the administration of the Plan..
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, this 4th day of
August, 1998.
ATTEST:
Gary Braun, Mayor
Becky 1. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
.
.
.
'I
.,
08/89
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN DOCUMENT
~RT'CLe l. INTAOCUCTION
The Emoloyerr.e~byestabl:shesthe E~pleyersDef8rre'J
S.::-n:ens!ton Flar.. rereinalter referrs.1to 35 me 'Plan,'
-:-re Plan cOnSISts of t~9 provI5!OrlS set fonn In this aocumer..,
rr1e cmmaty pt:rpose of this Plan IS to provide reftreme"'~
! :cme &n:: otr,6r oele~red tenetits to the E~ployees ct t"e
=mOloy~r In accordance with the provisions ot SectIOn 457 of
:r e Ir~err,aJ ne'lerh.:e Code of 1966, as amended (,he "Co::le ':..
This Flan shall be an agreement sOlelY between me
=~cfoyer and ~an'elpating Employees.
.
~FlTICL.e II. DEFINITIONS
SectIon 2.0' Account: The tookkeeolng a.:court
malntafnsd for each Part:cioant relle:ung :ne cu.
~ulative amount ot the Partic:panl'! Oelerree C::-n.
::ensatlon, InclJding any income. gaIns. losses, or
nC~2ases or decreases It1 market value 8lt'1butatile
::> the err.p~oye(s investment of the ?anlcloant s
Deterred CcmpQnsatior-. and further ref1ectir:o any
astroutJons to the Partlcicant cr tr.e Pa~lo:)ar:t s
aeneticiary llr:d any fees or EXoen$eS cna~ceo
aga,nst suc:n Participant's Delerred Compensation.
section 2.02 Administrator: The oerson or !:ersons
narred to carry out certain nond1scret:onary ed.
11:n1StrauV81unC!lCns unaer me Pia". as here naner
aescnoea. The Employer may remove 2J\Y person
as Adminis~r8tor upon 60 dllYS' a:lVance nctlce In
"',rlll~~ 10 SUCh person,ln which casathe EmolOYEr
sna I n!rr.e another person or persons to act as
Aa!'T'n's:rat'::l~. r"le Administrator may reslqn I,;con
-:0 ::lays' aavar.ce no:ice in writing :::It'1e E~pl;';er.
,- wn ~n case the Employsr sr.all name anO:o"er
:: ..~,cr. ~r C8r&Ons to ad as Aamtnlstrlltor.
SectIon 2.03 Beneficiary: The person or persont ces,g-
'-s:ea tly tne PartiCIpant in nlS Jo,noer Aqreement
....~.~ snell receive any benet.:s payatlte hereJn:::le'l~
::-.e e'/em of the Participant'S death. In It'e eventtl. at
:-e PartlCll)ar.t 'lames two or r.-ore Benel1c:ar'es.
sac:n ~neflClary snail be en!'tled to eQual snares 01
'~e oenell'la payable at the Fartieicant'& dea!..,. un.
ass ott:erw,se proVIded in the PartICipant'S jo~ncklr
Aqree",ent. It no beneficiary is cesl9nat~ in t~e
w:lInaer Agreement. If the Oeslgnate<l BenefICiary
:reoeeeases lhe PartiCipant, or I' the des'g."\aleo
:lenelldary ooe5 not survive :M Partlooam f:)' a
:::enoo of f 'le9n (1!1) davs. then Ih es!a:e cf :r.e
=..rt'cloant Ehall be the Beneirciay
5ectton 2.04 Deterred Compensation: The a.'T:::unt cr
,~onr08f Comoensatlon otherwise paVaole to :re
;:Jar.lcl~nl wr1cn t"'e Partcipant ar~ me employe'
-nutualtj acree to defer nereunaer. a~y iimOl.n.
:re~:t8(1 to a Participant's Account by reason ct a
'~anst..r U'l~r section 6.03. or anv ctner amo:J'1~
..r.;::-. ::-,a Em:).o',er agr$$S to creolt t: a Far..c.pdr,t s
.1 :;count.
SectIon 2.05 Emplo.,..: An}' 1/1d:o.r.dulll who o~~'lloes
~ grylC6S lor tl':e Emp:oyer. whether as an 6!TO:ovee
,:.1 tnQ emo!oyer or as en maecenoent C0'11racior.
.
and who nag b~en d~!Jl;r.a.ed 'Cq Ir:ll Emoloyer as
eligible to partjcipat~ !n me Flan.
S~tion 2.06 Includible Compensation: Tt-e amount of
an EmplOyee 'a ccmpansauon irem tne Employer for
a taxable year ~hal IS a~nDutable !o service. pe~
rormea for the Employer ana that is inC1Ud:bla in the.
E:np:oyee s gross Income for the laxaDle year for
!ederat income lax curccses: SL:cn term does not
inClude ar.y amount exCfudabl9 Irom 9'OU income
under thiS Plan or eny omer p~an aescribed in
Section 457(b) cf the Cooe or any cther amount
exc:udable from giCSS I~come ler tecar;al ir.come tall
lAJrpvses. Inclucllble Comper'salicn snallDe deter.
mineo without re~aro to any community property
iaws. .
Section 2.07 JoInder Agreement: An aoreement en.
tereo in:" oelWeen an Emi=lavee ana the Employer,
inCluding any amenoments or mo::ufieationa tnereot.
Such agreemer,1 shall fix the amount o! Oererrea
Compensat,on. speCify a :>refe'ence among the
'nllestmentaltemauves ceslgrlateo by tl\e Employer,
deslgr"a:e the Emoroye!!'! e'1neficlary or Beneticla-
rles. ar,d incorpcrate Ihe tel'lr.s, conclUona, and
proVISIOns of t~e Plan by reference.
Section 2.08 Norm.f CompenSAtion: The amount ot
co~pensatJon which ',';oL.:I::l te cay-...::>:e to a Partici.
:>am 0'" Ihe emplOye.- t:.r a :al{aOle year If no JOinder
Agreement were in etfect to oefer compensation
I.:n09r thiS Plan.
Section 2.09 Normal Retirement Age: Age 70.112. un-
less tne Partlclpar.t nas e:gctec an alternate Normal
rle:ireme"! Age by wnlten :nSlrument delivered :0
the Aarr.lnlSlrator :l::or to Secaratlon f:om Service.
A PartlclC)a:-\t', Nom-al Retiremef"t AQe determInes
the pe1cc tiuring wnlcn a Pan:ocant r:'lay U".ill~e the
.:atcn-uo limitatIon ot Sect':::.n 5.02 ~ereunder. Once
a Part:cioant nas to anv extent utilize:3 Ihe catch.up
:;mr1atlon cf Section 5.02. h Slr.er f'l.:)r""\BI Retire.
menl age may not De cnangeo.
A Panlo;pa."lt's a:terrste Normat Retirement Age
may n:.t =e earlier Inan tre earlles: oale ~at the
Partlcipan: will beeome eligible to retire ana receive
unreduC:80 retirement tleneflts t.noert."e Employer~
baSIC; renrer'f'lent plan cO'w'er,ng the DamclOanr ano
may not be later trlar. :ne cate tr:e Participanl WIll
attain age 70-112. II a Panlci:>ant eonl!nues emplOy.
ment after 8ttZL"ang a!;e 7C-: /2, :--:t navlng previ.
o\.:sly e &Cteo an allerna:e Ncrmal Petirement Age.
.ne Panlcleant's a ternate Normal Retlrernent Age
sM11 not telatertnan tre manoatory rellremtl'lt age.
If any. IlstaO:lsnec by !ne Err-Cloyer, N the age at
whlcn me Partic::::ant aCluatl!f separates Irom aer.
';:ce .r ~t:e Ernoloyer nu no mandal::lry retlfemem
age. If ~he Perticipanl Will nor t:>~ome eligible to
receIve Oenefl!!! under a ca:;lc ~!lrClment plan
mai"toSln9\J 0'., tr.e Erno,o.,&-- ::-'0 ;:a~t1c.~anl s alter-
nate Nonr.1I1 Retirement Age may not ce ear1iertnan
age 5S ana may not be SaltH than age 70.112.
Section 2.10 Participant: Af1V Em,,: o',e e ....no has loinea
the Plan Ol,;.'suant to me reC:.JlremE'ntS 01 Article tV.
Section 2. ~ 1 Plan V.ar: n'e c.!lIencar year.
Section 2.12 Retirement: Thtl il(SI CElltl u~on ',v('\IC"i OCtr.
:.! tr.e fcilowing sr..1I r.ave ccc~~red '.vlt~ re!::eCt tc
a pan cloant: Ssoara:IC.1 trom Service ana altair.-
~er" ct a~e 65.
Se~tlon 2.13 Separation from ServIce: S,=verance cf
:"lg Panic:aant'S employment With the E~a:cyer
...h:.:n constitutes a 'seoaratlon frcm s..rvlca' .....il.r.i'
:ne rreanlng of Section 402(e)( '" }lA}(ii:} ot :he Cede.
n g;r.~ral. a Pan:clpant shall be ceemeo ::> nave
sever&a his employment with 1t-~ Employer ret pur-
pOsiS of this Plan when; in accoroance Wltn :~e
estacl:sheo practices ot the Emp!oyer. t~e em;Jloy-
menl r.elallonship isconsicerec 10 neve actuail',
lerr-lr.at6d. In Ihe case of a Pe"icipa~: whc .s ar.
rd6oenaentcontractorcf the Emc;oyer. Sepa:allCr.
from ServICe snail be oeemeo 10 nave OCCurreo
Nhen :ne Panlcloanl's centrad ";-Ider which ser-
'/!ces ara performed has complQt~ly 9ltDlrG~ ant!
termlnatea, tnete is no fcreseeaote poss;ciil:y thaI
~!'1e EmCloyerwill rer.ew :ne contract or enter Into s
new cont~act tor the P artlc:panl'S seMces. and It is
not ant:cioat90 tr.at t~e PartJci;)!ln~ \'.111 tecc.me 8~
:moloyee oltne Employer.
AATICL.E III. ADMINIS1RA TlON
Section 3.01 Duties of Employer: Tr.e Em;)IOver sne!;
"8V~ lhe authontyto make all d::scrQtior.ary O.C;lSlons
atfectln~ the ngh:S or benefits ot. Par.lC/pants wr.1~
r.-:ay c& reQuired in the adminislration ot this Plan.
Sectlon 3.02 Dutlea of Administrator: one AdmlnlS'
tra:or. 85 agem for tt1e Employer. snail pencrm
nonOlscret:onary 8c2minlstrative ~un~lons In eon.
rec:..:r. W Ih the P,an. L'iCll.lC:r.g l:'1e rra r::ena~C9 ot
PartlClcants' Accounts. l"e prOVISIon of penco.c
repons of the status ot each Account. and tne
ClstJrsement of Denehts on :er.al' of the Employer
('\ ac:e.cance WIth the crovlSlons ot thIS plen.
:'RT1C~E IV. ~ARTlCIPATION IN THE PLAN
Section 4.01 Initial Participation: An E!'!",oloyee ma'"
te::crr.e a PanlCloanl t', entenng _"lto a JCI:lcer
A.;reement prIOr :0 t:'le oeqlnnlng 01 tneca:erlOsr
mon~r In wntch ~e JOIr.::Ier Aereement IS to tecome
c~e~: va 10 ceter cOr'!'pens!t;on not yel eamec.
Section 4.02 Amendment of JOInder Agreement: A"
~~r:lc:oant r-ay arT"enO an executed JOlnaer
':'C;'llement to changfl tl'\e emo:..nt of compensation
~:)t V9t earnea wn'cn is to ce oelerrvd.lincl:.l:2mg t.,e
reouc,'on ot such future 1eterrals to 1erO) cr to
::r.an?e tHS IIlvest~ent ore!erence (iub:ect to sucn
rc.:Sl' c~ons as may resllltt:o~ :ne nature or :erms C'
any Ir'lvestment mace OV the Err.Ploven. S\;c~
amer,O~lml Shall become 'er'~tlve as 01 ~he oeg:r:-
'ilng ct tt'.e calendar montn ~mmencln9 atter t"'le
-::a:e tr.e amenoment is 8xe~:ed. A Panll:io21nt mav
at arvt::r.eameno n 5 Jcir.cer .A.greer"1ent::; ~ange
t~e oes;onated 8enehclary. ana S'Jcn amenoment
!or-all become effectIVe irr.meclately.
ARTIC~E V. LIMITATIONS ON DEA:RAALS
Sect!on 5.01 Normal Limitation: Ellceat as orovlded i"'l
~ectIC~ ::.02. :t.e maxImum err,our.: 01 ;)-::Ierrec
C:lrr:DensaltOn tor any ParticiPant lor any laxaole
..oar Shall not OXCHO thO Uisser 01 S7.SeO.Co or 33-
'~.:i percent of the Particicant'S lnctudlble Compen-
sallon lor tt.e tllllatlle year. nis liMltaton will ordl.
,... a nlv oe eqUIValent to ttle lesser of S7,SOO.00 or 25
:::ercent of the Panl:loanrs NOm'st Compe!"lSlllon.
Section 5.02 Caten.up Limitation: .;;~r etaCn Or the'~
::"Iree ~ 3) tax80ie yea:s cf a Pen;clcant enOing
I .
,jr. nlS attatnmOlno 01 N?r~e; ReMlmel'lt Age, t
r:-:aXi~T1Jm amo:.r.t cl D~lerred Compensa:lon sna.
t:€ tM lesser of: (1) S 1 S.:J.:lO c~ (2) the Sum of (i) me
I.ormal Limllar cr for :r.! laxable year. !nc III) the
Nor'T':2' l.i~lla!lon '~r eacn enor taxable year oftMe
~an;c;lcant co~rr.enc:rg aner, 978 less tne amOunt
:>f the Panlci:ant's D~fe(red Ccmpensaton tor such
~~lOr la_able '{ears. A ;r;or 'axaole year shall te
taken I.,to a::count unCir t'1e p~eceoing sentence
or."'f II (.) the t-e.~':: 1=01 'it Via s eli9:ble to J:anicioati In
~'e Plan fc. sucn year :~r In any other eligible
~efer~ea ccmCQnsatlor. plan establlshed un~er
Secti0f1457 0' :r:e Coda whlcn IS pr()Oerly ta~n IntO
accC:Jn! pUfst.:ant to :eQ~I:lllons'undet section 457\,
anc (ii) compensa.t:e~ Ilf a~y) deferred under me
plan I:::r suCh ether plan I was s:Jblect 10 me deferral
:imitations set te~h 1:"\ Section 5.01.
Section 5.03 Other Plans: ""he amount eXCludable from
a PAi"uCloants gross i..come under this Plan or any
Oir.er ell~lble C6f01rreo com::.ensation plan under
sectlcn 4~7 ct :t.e Code snail not exceeo $7,500.00
. or sucn greiltQr a Toe:.:nt allow9t1 under Section 5.02
:;f tl":e P;an) ;,; ss any &rrount eXClUded from gross
"co::-:e ur.cer sect:o, '-03(b). 402Ia)(8), or 402
~h)(l)( 6) o! tr.e Ceoe. or eny amoullI wit,.. respect t:l
....fllch a ceduC~I::n 1$ 8iJowsble by rsasen ot a
~ontrJbution to an on;anlzatlon d;scribed i~ sectIOn
501lC)116) ot t,e COJe.
AATICL.E VI. INVESTMENTS AND ACCOUNT VALUES
Section 6.01 Investment of De'erred co. mpensall~
All invutments of Partlc:pant's Deferrea Com~
S:ilC~' rr.ace; :',' :~.e t:~~:OyEH. 1"'.:IUCI~g all or'O!:erty
ana ~,gntS purcnaseo With sue."'I amounts and all
,nccm~ atlributacle thereto. shall be the sole J:rcp-
gl1y 0' me Emc1cyer ana shall not be held In trust fer
::'5 '1le pa:lts 0: as cOllatgral secunty fort!le ful!illment
of tt:e Emoloyer S c:>lIgat"ons ur.der the. Plen. Sucn
=roperty snail ce SliOle~ to the cfalms of gen8~1
:~cCitCrsot. :ne E:T;)lcyer. ar.a r.o Participant or
~e('."'llclar; Sr.BII na,.,e !!~V veste::! interesl or securea
cr p'~lerro!!OCeS:~lOn wlln rescect 10 S~ prooeny or
~a...e any ::1~1rr. agalns: the :mpfoyer except as a
seMra' :redltor.
Section 0.02 Crediting 01 Accounts: The ~anlelpan!'s
~c~:;rt snaIl relll!Cl ~t\t! amO..Jnl ana value Of the
rwestmer.1S c.~. ether crcoer:y oetain.o by tne E~-
;:I.:yer tnrouc;p ltle lfi..eslment ot the ?articioanrs
::916r760 Corr.censatlcn. It is antlC/oalea tnat the
:mplOyftr 5 ,n...estmerts WI In re9pect to a Partlci.
c.nt .....111 conlor~ ::> r~e ,nvestmenl oreferer.ce
scec.hea 1:'\ :r.e Pa~:c ~ant s JOlnoer Agreemenr.
~ut r:>t~'W19 nerE: n s:'lal: oe cons:rU~ t~ requIre :ng
~mp:cyer te maKe eo:w p8~lc:.Jlar 'nveSD'TIent ot a
?anlClpar!'s Deferred Co:r:censation. EaCh Partlel-
:2nt snSl1 r8celV~ oe rlCNic reoons. nouess freQuently
:n.."I arnually, sr,CW r,g me tner",-currem value of hiS
:'cccum.
SKtlOn 6.03 TranSfers: i 81 Inceming 7~ansters; ;..
'ransfer ""ay 0& accepteo from en eligit:le deterrllO
~omo6nsatlon alan r"'!alnta106'.:1 Dyanotheremolo\'er
;~~n ~;~~~~; ~~~CI~~~~:A~;r'~~~~~~~~~;~~;:.'
With tnat emoloyer ana ceccme an EmCloyee 01
:mpcoyer. ana (it) t~e other emcfoyefs D!an oro-
..'des !nat SUCh t~ansle~ Will be made. The Err.oloyer
.1'\ay reQUire sucn oocumentauon trom the oreae-
:essor olan as It aeems r.ecessary to etfectuate !he
:rer.s:..r. t~ CC~!lrm :/'lal ~a,..c" ;>!an :3 i.,. eligible
1efer-a, ccmpenSallor'l t:!aJ1 WSthlr: Ir:e ~Ela.:11'I9 ot
See: on .:. 57 of tne Ceda. a.nd to assure tr.~ llrans fe rs
ate ::..~vioed !cr uncar suera Ola'!. The Emoloyer
ma I refuse Iv accept a transfer ,1"1 tr.Q form 01 esse~s
oJth~' ~han C3sh., unless. t"e emplov~r anJ me
Ao~;rrs['l!tcr agree to r.old SU;.... omer tl5sets lJncer
t"1e P:an. ':'JiYSUC~ transferred amount snail not tle
:'eelea .as 8 deferral subject to the ,imitat:or.s ')f
A'M;c:e V, excepl that. fer purposes ot app'VlOg t~e
I mi:at:ens of Sections 5.01 ana ~.02. an amou~t
'jeferrea dUring any t3)l8018 year urY.ler P';e plan
::orr. ',,,nICh :he transfer is accepted shail be treate~
. as If i: ~as Oeen deterred undellf13 Plan curing $ucn
taxaDle year and compensation paid oy the Irar:sferor
emotoyer snali be trealea as 11 it had been p~a oy tl1e
Emp:oyer.
iO) O..itgo;r.g Irar.sfers: An amOllnl rr:ay be :rans.
!:rred 10 an eugibk: deferred comp!nsatlon plan
~a'rlall'led by another employer. and chaige::lIO a
?an:clpant's Account under thiS Plan. if (:) t~e Par.
~:clpant l'las separated from service With the Em.
:Jloyer ar.a become an emp!oyee 01 the Ol"er em.
~Iove'. n 1M ettler emo:oyers plan O~"'la8S that
S..Jc." tlanster will be acc:aoted. and (Iii) U:1l Partlcl'
pant ana the emO:OYlirS rave SIgned SUC!1 agree-
~en:s as are necessary Ie asSUre troat :he EmplCyer s
liablllt{lo Day bsnefits to the PartiCiPant ~as Deen
d:scharged . ano assumed oy ln8 ether emplOyer.
The Emptoyermay require such dOCumenra:lon
from lroe otner plan 8$ it deems r.ecessary to eNec-
~uale t",e Iransfer. to confirm Ihal 5uc....p/an i'i a.,
eligible celerred compenSation plan within Ihe
. .'7\eanlng ots9CliOI'\ 457 of the Cooe. and to aSSl,;re
:...at . transfers are proviced for unaer 5!.d'1 plan.
Sucn transfers Shall oa made ol'lly under SliCh
:'rcumsten:es as areper~;tted ur:cer seCI.:;~ 4~':'
cf the COde and tile regUlations I/le~eunaer.
Section 6.04 Employer LIability: In no event sl"alllhlil
=~p:oyer S lIabillly 10 pay 06nelits tc a fJamclpant
:.;nder Art:cl; VI ixceea the value c( ~r.e arr.cunls
:r~I:~ :0 :ne Pan;Cl~ant's ACCO;.Jnt: 1r.e Emo:oyer
. ~."Ial nOl ee I ab'e for ICsses anSlIIg :rClr.> ee::lrecia-
. :r: or S"~ .nkaqe In Ihe value cf any lro'/estments
';::0... rea L..,oer :nl$ P:an.
.
ARTICLE 'III. 8ENEFITS
Section 7.01 Retirement Benefits end Election on
Separation from ServIce: Excco! as ctr"erwlse
::rov:ceO In L'lIS Anicle VII. the oislnoullon o~ a
::lartlCoanrs Accourrt Shall commence 8S of Agril1
:1 :te CAtenosr year atter tne Plan Year 01 t~~-
;:left clcar.:'s Retirement. andtt'ledistriblrtion olsucn
=ie:uerT'oel'\t benefrtS shall be made In acccrcarice
...1m cne of ~he payment options descnbed In Sec.
':or. 7.02. N,:)twithstanding theloreOOfug. tne Pen.cl'
::lant rray rrrevocaDIY elec:t Within 60 daystollcwing
Separallor. from Service 10 na...e the distribution cf
::.eren!S comr.'!ence en a fllceo or celermlnable ca:e
()tn!r trlan ~na: descnOed:n the cre:::eC'rlg se'ltence
''':hicn 'S al least 60 days after ~he date suc" eleetior.
s cellvered:n wrltlng to me e""p1cyer and fo:-....arde<:l
':;l the AOmlnlSrrator. but no: 'at;r :ran Aom 1 01 ~e
'.~",r !c!.ow.ng the year of tne PartIcipant's Retue-
. -e."\~;:' a::arn"'e"1t or aC;1l i:::.' 1'2. .....rlcre.,o;r 'S later
Ktlon 1.02 Payment Options: As ProvK3ed In SeCl:O'"l:S
7.01. 7.0.4. and 7.05. a Pan,e:oant or aene'I.:.ary
may e'ecl 10 have tne vcUue 01 Ihe PanlC'canrs
";'cc:;u~t ClslnOOled in 2ccoraar.ce wltn onQ or tne
:;1
it
'~llowtr.g ;:a"'l":"~m cctlons. provldec Ihat Sl:e" e~.
. !:O:'l 's ccr-slster.! WIt., tre !I~lta:lc.ns sel tonh in
SecMn 7.03:
(a) C =lual mon:hl'l. : uaneny, semi. annual or anl'ual
caymen!s inlln a~ount CrOSen oy me P2IrtiClp3nt.
':Onllr .;;:lg wnW hiS Account .s e:cna:.Jsleo:
,:b) One .u;r:p-su:-r:payrr.e'lt:
::;: Approx:mataly equal rr.Or.:r.I'" ~l.:anerly. ~eml-
annual or a",nua! ;;:;y;ne:-.:s calcule~ed to
COl'lllnue fora penod cem!'n =r03er. by the
PartiCIpant.
(dl .A.nnual Paymen.:,g eC:.JaJ 10 the minrmum
distr;buticns reQUlrec :.;r.der Sect,c" 401 (a)(9) 0'
!he COde over tne !;Ie eliOectl!r.c~'. of the
PaniCioant or over the ;i~e 6xoeclar-c1el of the
Part:cipant and hl9Jher Beneticlary. .
'e I Payments eqU2Ilto oayments rr.ade tv :he ISsuer
o. a retIrement annu::y PCliCY aC:::l:,Jlred by tne
E:nployer.
(I) ;'.""y other 08y:ne~t cPt'on alecleo t:y Ihe
;:lartlcioart ana egrlleo 10 b'; 'r:e Employer and
':"Clrr.rr.lstrator. ;:rl)vldedma. s:.JCn OOllon musl
;:rovlJe tc~ sucstar.tiallyr.or.lncreeslr-:; payments
'or any purloe a!ter t:'\e laleSI bene'lt
commencement cc::e uncer SGcliol'l 7.01.
A Part:Clcanl'S or 6anetlcia'Ys ~Ililc:tion of a
;:laY~9I"t oOI:on mus: oe made at ~Q3sI30 ~ays
::Jefere ihe paymen: of tel'".afi:9.1s 10 co.1'\mence.
If a Pa11Clpant or Beneflcsary, failS to mal<e a
timely el~~io... 01 a oav:ne"t cotion. benefits
snail be caJd mo~th"; uncer cetlcr ~c) above fot
a oenoo of five ','ears.
Section 7.03 Umltatlon on Opticns: Nc :l21ymQnt option
May tl~ selected ='1 a PartICI:::..n' or Beneficiary
ur:aer S&Ctlons 7.02. 7 .~4. Ot 7.0S l.!r:leSSIT satIsfies
tt.. r;QUlremenls or Sections 40 t (a;(9) a~ 457(d)(2)
. of tt:e CV<::e. InCIUCI~Q Ihll oaym~nrs r;ommenCTng
::etore lM::lea:n c! :roe Pert cical\! !:'lall satISfy the
"claer.t~' tleatn :)enefi!s :;oulremenl unoerSection
~57(dIl21:B)(ij(IJ. Un~eS$ -other,.",::!:! ~1~~Ga ey me
Partlcloanl, a.1 determlOatlo:':s unoer 58<:1:0n
.10' raJ(9) shall ce maOe W'lr.Ou: ~l!-':alC:l.!lal;On of liIe
eXj:ectaooe!. '.
S'eCtion 7.04 Po.t-retirement Death 8~nefits; leI Should
t"'le Panicipantdle ar.~r nelsne no.s te~un 10 receIVe
benefits U:10er a !:layment oOllon. Ihe remaln:ng
pav",ents. It any. uneerthe P3yment OOlion snail be
pavaole to the PaniC/pant's Beneficaary commenc.
ing wl~in ttle 3O.day penoc c::m~E~::;r.9 WIth tI"'.e
6' 8t oay aft&~ me P~nicip8nt S deciTn, L;r,less the
Beneficia:-f;e.ecls oaY:T1ent lonoer a o.~ferent pay.
ment oplIon tnat IS ava/'oble ur:cer Sectlorl 7.02
within 60 days of ~he Part1Clca.11S de8th. Al'\vc:l!tferenr
paymem cotlon elecleO cy a 8enef.clar/ unoe" this
~ect'or: mL;st orovrde tCI oayrr.enfS al a rale Ihat IS at
least as raD:d as urder tre C8yment oot:or: mat was
ai)p:lCaD~e to the Parllcloant. In "0 Qvam snail the
EmPloyeror Administrator oe 'lab I; to Ine Beneficiary
for the amount 01 any payment mac e In tt:e name 01
tr.e Partieio~1"1 belore :he AcmlOlstratc~ 'e~ef\'es
: ~CO! cf ==a~n :: ::-:e Pe~::::::3rfL
(0) If the deslgnared Beneficiary coes not contJnue
to live lor t"9 rema:nlng period of payments under
:tte Dayment ootlon. tnen Ine comrr ulea v a'L:e ot any
:-emalnlng pavmenrs l.l"Clertne oaymenr C:flOO snail
CQ calo In alumo sum :0 Ire QilQla of the Bene!!-
::I;:\r,... 1:1 [t;: CV'lnttnOlt thg ?m"car.l's 6Sla\e IS troe
BanQtil;lary. the ccmmuteo Vlil...e 01 any re,...a!(.lng
payr.-:ents uncerthe pavrr.en, o::>tlon snail t:e calo:~
the eSla:e In a turno su'm,
Section 7.05 Pre-retirement Death Benefits: (a) S:-O~I=
the Participant die tlEifore "e/she haS oegun :~
receIve Ine benefits prowieo cy 5act:on 7 01. t"e
value of the Particicant's ACc:;Qunt sr:a:1 be payable
to t"le Beneficiary commenctng wllh:n the30.Clay
penoj ccmmencing en It.e 9151 oay after t:'.e
Pa~cipanrs death. unless the Beneficiary IrrevoeaCly
e leelS a d,Herent fixed or c:ietem,."able benefit carr..
mencemsr.t date within 90 dayS of t."Ie Participant's
death. Such benefit comm6f1Cement date snail te
nOI iater tt1an the laterot Ii) Oecember 31 01 the year
follOWing thB year of the Part:clcant's death. or (!i) it
1'",9 8enelictary is 1l\6 Participar:rs spouse. Decem:6r
:! 1 oi the year In which t11e ;::articipant would ha...e
attained age 70-112.
(b) Unless a Beneficiary elects a ditfere:lt oaym.nt
0:0101'\ orlor to the benefit ccm-enCQrnenl oa'e.
eeat~ oenet.ts under thiS SectIon snail be paid ::1
approximalelY equat annuall:"lstallrnents O'olQr ::. Ii
years. or over SUCh snc~er oenoo as ::"lay oe nece s.
sary to assure lhat the amount ot any annual .r.stall.
men\ IS not less than S3.500. A Beneficiary s.haJ; :::e
Ireated as If he/she were a Participant for purposes
oi cetermir.ingtl'\e payment opuons a'/allable uno.r
Section 7.02. providlild. nowever. 'roal me payrnent
OCllOn chesen by the BenefiCIary rnust provide 'or
payments 10 the Benefictary over a penoel no lo/'\;er
ll"an tne life expeCtanCY of \~e Benefic:iary. and
provideo Ihat such period may not exc:eed "'teen
(15) years il tt-e Beneficiary IS MI t'ie Participant s
s:>ouse.
,c) :n \'1e event that the eeneficiary ales cefore tne
pa','mer! of death benefts r.as CCf'l"mencea or oeen
c:mOI9Ied. the remaining value o' the ?artic:ioant s
~tcou"t snall be paid to t~e estate ollt.e 8er.enCIar'f
., a Ii...mo sum. In the e'Yent :ha~ the Partic'car.t s
..~taI8 II; ~ne Beneficiary. ~ayrr.enl snail be ma.:l9 to
~n& 6s:a:e In a lurrp sum. .
S.ction 7.0& Untor..eeDDle Emergencl": tal In I-.e
evenl an L.r.toreseeaolee'T'ergency o=curs. a Per-
~ic;panl may aOElIY to It'e E~tlloyer to receIVe thaI
pan of tne val\;9 ot nis AccolOnt tnat IS reasonaolv
rleeded to saus1y the emergency r:eeo. I! St.:cn an
aop:lcat.on lsapproveo OYlhe Employer. tne Part:cl-
::ent snail be paid onlysucn a'Tlounl OS th. EmOlover
ceems recessary to meet lna emergency naeo. Oul
c:aym;nl $hall nOI be made to the extent that Ihe
'Inanc~1 naraship may oe re!.eved lhrcu;r'o cessa-
:ion cf oererral uncer me Pl;.n. I.,s~rance or OHler
"',,:mtlursemenl. er IiQUIC8!10n cf o:ner assets to It e
611tenl6ucn IiQuioation wc.wld not itself cause severe
! na nelsl hardShip.
t\ An \..nforeseeaDle eme'ger'cy snail be oeemeo
., IrWOIVe only clrcums:ances c~ severe I.nar.c:al
harcsnlp to IMe Partiooanl resulttnc; f"Om a su::::::en
Jnexoecred illness. aCClOenl. or clsaciiity of ~he
~artlC1pant or of a cecenaent (as ceMeo In Sedlon
15Z(al of tr.e Cvoe) o~ tr.a P!.rt:c:panl. less of lhe
~ a!"\tc'pant s property aue to cas""alt~. or Olner sim'-
ar and extraordinary untoreseeao!e ctrC\,;mstances
arIsing as a result 01 eve ms ceyona tM control ot the
P artiClpant. The neeclta send a Pamc:oW\I's child to
;:;lIeg8 cr to purcnase a rew r.cme snail roct ~e
:::lnSl0erea unforeseeaole emerQenc:es. Theaerer-
.~'
T.""
':"',i:ri.
'\
."
mir-a:IO:- ..5 '.~ '.Vnet~l;;r S~lch an ',1nforesevatl1e
..mQrg~',.:'1 IOXIS:; ~ra I c:; C.i~O cn tr" m.rat. ot .
6aen InC;','h:.ual case.
Section 7.01 ;"ansit!onal RlJle tor Pre-1989 Elenefit
Electlons:r :,ee'/et;lt tr,,:. cnOrlo,;anuary 11.989.
a Pa!t.c.:iJ,1 :;~ 5e~!!;lc:a"Y nas commencea reo
ceiving ::;aneiits uncer a paymer:1 oplion or has
irrevocC'.cry e:ec\eO a eaym&nl option ,~r benefit
corr.mercemem oale. t~en that oayment cotion or
electo:-. ~r.ai: ramal' I' eifecl nCIVllthstand;"g any
c~ner pr::l" Slorct tnls Plan.'
ARTICL.E VIII. NON-~SSIGNABllITY .
Section 8.01 :n General~ Except as provided in Seclion
8.02. iO Fartlci;::ant or 3eMilciary snail have any
r:gnn, c:::mm;ne. sell, assign. ~tedge. transter 0:
Clnerw:se ~nv9Y or encumber the right to receive
any payments hereuncer. whiCn paymentsBna fights
are exoreSSIY ceclared t::l oe r.on-assignaOle ana
nor-tranSlera::lle.
Sectlon 8.02 Domestic RelatiOnS Orders: fa} Allow-
ance of TranSlefs: To t!"o~ 911.lent rQOUllea uroaer a
ftnallucc;menl. :jecr!!~. cr crcaqlncluding aQProvaJ
c: a j;r::::lerl'( sett'e\Oent ac;reementl made pursuant
10 a sta:e comestic :ellUlons law.' any pOnlon 01 8
Pel"1lc:oanrs Account may oe oaldor Sit aside for
payment to a soouse. lorme,r ~pouse. or cnild of tl'le
Fan:cioant. Where necessary to carry out the.terms
01 suen an oraer:a separate Account shall oe
estaOlisr.eo Ylltn respeCI :0 ,ne' aoouse. former
spol..se. Ol' cnlld wno snail beemiUItd to.make
investment ! eleCtions with respect the,.tC) In the.
same rr:an~er as ~h8 ?artIClpant: any amaurit so set
asioe tor a SOO..lS9. lormer spouse. or child shall be
paid oul ,n a ump sum at t."le eartIest..oate that
benehls may oe oalO to Ine ?al1lclcant;unliH the
order directS a Olffe'ent ~Ime or torm of'payment.
~')t~'lIn<; :~ ~, s Seellcn s~gll be construed to a"ltlo.
n%e any amour: :0 oe ~Ismcl.tea llndar tne Plan at
a tll~e cr:n a form t~allS "'101 oermlnaa under SectIon
~57 cf :~e Ceca. t-r:y oayment r--aoe to a person
Jm6r ~r-2.:1 :t:e Part c:::ant ;:lursuant to Itlis Sec\:Qn
snail ce rli::lUCeC DO; reou.rea Ir"come lax WllnhOld.
,~; t- a tac:t lha' oa-;I-'9~1 'S r-aca to a oel"SOn c.1".ar
!r.an I"a Pa::tClcsnt r'lav net crevent sucn payment
"em :eln9 :r-::lud.ble In tregress Income 01 t~e
P an.clean! IV: wl~I".oIClln9 and Income tax reponing
O.Jrposes.
101 ~ele:1$e f:QrrI L aOllity 10 P~rtlcioant: :~e
::mo;"ver 5 liaoi\oty to ca'; benelits to a PaltlCtpant
s;:all ce reau=e:J 10 ;:1e ex:er.: ::1atamo;,Jnts r.eve
been oa,o or sel as.oe ~or cavment to a spouse.
f,~ r,..... - sOQuse. c~ t~:::;) ct,;rsuant \0 c;aragraph lal ot
::-.:5 Se-ct::n. tJo S,J'~ Ire"~ler sr.allbe eriect\Jatea
.;nless tr.e EmpIo/_r or Admrn:stra\or has ceen
crovloec With satlstactoryeVloe!')C~Hhal tr.8 En-
:toyer a-:O I~e Admln!Slra~or are rel.~ased from any
'unr.er CIU:1 oy tne ParJcloant w,th'resced te sucn
::Tlcun:s. The ~ar::c;:ant"snall be deemed to have
.eleaseo tne Employer !:"lO t"'leAdlT'.:r.lstrator from
!~v c:alm wltn resPect to sucn amounts. In any case
In ~vr or: 11) ~r.e err.~lCyer or AClmlnLstrator nas been
sarvea '1'0'1\1'1 legal t:rocee.& or otneCWllle jcined in a
prcceeclng relalt~g :0 sucn transt,er. lii) the" perl:~CI
:lant nas been nctlfied otl'le penOenc:v.ot s
;lroc:eeolng In t:'le manr:er crescnbM oy t~e law
:,e !uriSC2iction In wnlch tne proceedinO IS cenoing
l.,r ~ervlce of process In sucn sCtI"n or t)V IT'ail fr:>m
:ha Emp:oyer or Admltl!Slrator lot"e ::arucioant's
~
e
iS~ ". -;WI" mell,r; aeoress. ..nd (i,,', l~e ;:!l~'C:I'
:..i~r la 8 :0 ectaln 3n C~~Gr 01 lMIi court Irl :I"e
:rocee:l.rg rel'l!'lIng t~e =~OIOYoi!r or Aamln'stra.
':;r "::!':'l :-:e oOl.gallon 10 cO.""ply w,tn me ...eg.
-ent, :,;!9cree cr c~oer,
:: ?a1:c:~atiM ':0; L~I Prcceedlr.!;s: -ry-.;: =~.
::c',er ana Ad!T'I~,stralor snail not be CDlIga:ec :0
:;e'eno 3.;laln~: or set aSide sr.'" iudgm~nt. cecree,
:r cree' cese: bel] in pSr3graon (a) or MY leg..;
;rae' 'e!atlng 10 m9 gamlshment cf a Parl1cJPar.t~
:.ene'lts. unless :~9 full expense of sueh legal act:~r.
~ tJo'"e bv 11-9 ~artle;pant, in the ever! that !,-e
;: ar1:~:c.!nt:$ actlOf'1 f orlnachonl flonelheless ca:.se.!
:~e E ~:::oyer or Administratorto lncursucn QXClinse.
:'Hl arr.:lun! of the expenslil may O~ chargee agaInst
"'l Pai1JClpanrs Acccunt ana thereoy reacca !rie
~~c.oyer's OC!lga~lon to pay cen'elits to the Pert'CI'
:a":1. i:l the cowrse 0# any proceeding relating [0
: vorce. separation, or C~jld supporr, :ne E~prcyer
~a Aamlnlstrlltcr snail be aoJtnorlzed to ol$Close
ntormatlCin relating to the Participanl's Aecc:J:':t :0
'rQ Partic:pal't's spouse, lormar spouse, or croilo
lr"ctUCIr.g :r:e legal representatives ot the S::lCuse.
':rr"er spouse. or ~I!dl. or to a courr.
~~rlCLE iX. REI.ATlONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS .vm
~MPLOY~ENTAQREEMENTS
-,. s ::an serves in aadilion to er.y other 'etlremltnl
:e"s:Orl, c~ cenei,l Plan or system preslintlY in existence or
-e'snal:er estaolishea t:;)r the cenellt of the Employers
,;~:"c'i'e=s. ana cart,cicauon ~eI9t:naer S'lall not at'ect
ce"le' 13 rece:'Ii!.Ole lIneer any s~cn planor system. rolotl'llng
:;r:la,neo ::1 :~. s '"Ian snail be deemed 10 consl,tute Ilr
eimCICym9r.: CJntract or agreement oetween any PanlCI'
;jam ana ine E'TlPloye- or to give any Pal1'clpant :r.e nght
t.:l cs rsralnea !n lhe emOIOy ot ~~e Emcloyer, Nor S"l2l.1
ao1Y:I"'ra ner~l:"I :lO co"struee Iv mod:ly thE! :erms of ar.y
-=m:l:::vrnen( con:racl c: agreemer,t oetween a Par:.clpar!
i\no t:-~ ~-:fo...e~.
e
.,-,.,~':tih'\l' ,;t1h*\~::;.,'
..,..~...
. -..e,-:.~,.
..~:
ARTICLE X. AMeNDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PI.AN
~~e Err-olcyer may at a.-'y III'r:e a~end thi~ Pan o~c'''lde~
:1- all, :ransmllS s~;n a...,e!'l::lrr.em In wr,"ng:o 1::; Aorr.!":stra,
:cr alleast 30 cays onortc t~e et'ect~ve oata oll:'le ,u"r.eflO-
'T.ent" :he consenr 01 t~e Adm~n:strator sl'1a.l r.:::1 l:& r~~I~ed
n creer .or 5U:::l am6norr,=:-.t l::l beccme.e'!9ctI1/9. c..: the
Administrator s"Ia!l be un de!' no oClIgallcn-:::l :cn:ll'ue acti!'\g
as Adrrinistrator nere.undlilr " it drsaoprOlles c.1 such 8menci~
me.,t. The EmOloyer may at any t.me te~mlna:e ~hls P'af'l.
The .Administrator may at ar.v time prOO::lse an amlilnd.
""'l..nt t~ t."8 Pian by 2'1 :r.str..."..ent in writing lransmlnsd 10 tns
:~oIO'ler at least 30 aa-/s b&fl)re the ettec:lve 08te of trIll
am&n<lmen-!. Such amenomenl shall become eHecr"" un.
ass. WIthin 5t.:cn 30.day ~erlOd. tr:e EmploYlir notifies the
AdmirllSt1!1lcr in writingth81lt d:sapc:roves suc., amancmem,
:n which case sucn ame~dmElnt shall r>ot become effective.
In :ne event 01 SUCh di5approval. the Admimstrator snail be
uncet IlO obligation 10 ::ontlniJ6 acting as Administrator
hereunder. II this Plan dOClJment ~$titutes an amenament
a"o restatemer'lt of :he Plan as ore'ViOl:sly adOpted by lhe
E:":"lj)lc;'er. the amendments con:alneo herelf~ s~all t:ecome
.lfect:ve on January 1. , 989. ana tr.e terms ct t~e oreceding
?Ian ::SoC\;mer.: shall remain In ettect throug" Decem~er 31.
'988,
8lcect as may oe 'eQU!rea to maJntaln the status 01 '''s
PI.en a $ an 811giole deterred compensll 110rl plan l.':1car Section
457 of Ihe Cc~e C~ to complY VIII" Oiher a::lc:,:::acle iaws, no
amenament or :ermination c# the Plan snall divest any
Part:CiC8nt of any nghts wltn resoect to c:)rr.censatlon ce-
lerreo oetore It'le cate of the amencment cr tarm!("aticn.
ARTiCLE Xl. APPLICAB1.E LAW
7his Plan s~all be constl'\Jea unoer tt.!llaWll ot t~e state
wnere t~e employer ;5 IccatlilC ana :$ es!..c:asned ~ith the
intent that II mee! Ine reC:Jlrerr.ent$ of ar'l 'e'l';jible ceterred
:O:Tl::lensallon c:a'l' '~r"a~r .S~t1cn 457 :~ :~9 Cooe, as
3mlinced. The :.rO\,:510"5 cl tl'\IS P:5n snail ::lA trlle~o'etec
wr;ereverpcsSIt'le In CC:110r~l1f Wit" ~ne rliOl:;remcnrs ot ~at
56:::t!~n \
ARTICLE Xli.
..1.nyrot!ce 10 a ::larryct ;~is Ola:o; ::':::l.:r.e"': S-311 t:~glllen
at :r;e ast s~~lress orov:osd I" ".,.flt.ng to:... :r.e ==11Y to
ar.cmer pany. Anyn:=t:::e suer: r:":!l1l9::l snail:. c;:srm.:-:eo 10.
:-.a,VSI cwn.recel'..ed Of Sl.cn p-=ny.
.
Application Form
Group Annuity Contracts
Aetna LIfe IDSUnlDce and Annuity Company
151 Farmington Avenue, Hartford, cr 06156-8022
"'1'
..,..
'''0,
.~
Client Information
.
Account Information
Investment Options
3DO-MOP.96
S~rpP~ r.i~y H~"
\ State
WA
I ZIP Code
98362
r. r
5. Type of pi and seclIon of Intemal Reve
a 403(b) Public SchoOl System
Tax-Deferred Annuity
Code (If any) under whICh plan Is to qualify:
EJ 457 P\Jt)Oc Employer 0 Non-457 Tax-Exempt Defefrecs
Deferred Compensation CompensaUon (for select
management and highly
compensated employees.
a Optional Retirement Plan for Higher EducaUon
o 403(b) 0 401(a)
o 403(b) for 501 (c)(3) OrganIZation
Tax-Deferred Annuity (0rgarUatI0nS tonned after
1019/69 must have IRS ruling regarding 501(c)(3) status)
o Rellrement Plus 0 HeaJlhC8I8 Retirement Plus
a VoluntarY 0 HeaJlhC8I8 voluntary .
a 401 (a) for 501 (c)(3) Organiza1lon
Tax-Deferred AnnuIty (OrgaIUatlonS fonned after
1019169 must have IRS ruling rega:t11ng 501 (c)(3) status)
a Rellrem8nt Plus a HeaJlheare Retirement Plus
o 401(1<) for 501 (c)(3) Organlza1lon (OrganizatIonS fonned after
1019169 must have IRS ruling r&gardIng 501 (c)(3) status)
a f'etiremenl Plus a HeaJlhC8I8 Retirement Plus
S. Is this contract subject to ERISA nUe 17
C Yes n No If yes. Plan ann/V8rs1l1Y Month _ Day_
COntract Is 10 be: I 8. Contract EJfec:llV8 Date
o A\IoCat8d C UnaBocated
9. ' GM Maturtty Notices shOUld be mailed 10:
m Participants 0 Employer
10. Will this contract change or replaCe any
exIs1Ing Ofe InsUranC8 or arnJIty contract1
o Yes :fi No
o 4ST Tax Exempt Deferred
Compensation (for select
management and NghIy
compensated employees)
o Other:
.
Plan BegbnnQ Date _
,"0 Partlclpants & Employer
" ya. please prOYlde Aa:ount Number
eamerName
Date to be
canceUed
1 1. Special Requests:
HeaJthCat8 501(C)(3) OrganIZations:
WIthdrawal Fee: 0 10 year 0 5 year
Transfer BoooS: 0 2% (OptIon A)
Other.
o None
o None (OptIon B)
12. Participants may elect the Investment allocation for:
f9C Employer and Employee COntttbutlonS 0 Employee Contrtbutlons oriy 0 None, Contract Holder elects
13. For Employer directed allocationS: Enter the percentage of payment and the Investment opllon chosen
lor aJlocauon purposes.
o Employer Moda1 ContributIonS:
o Employee Modal ContrtbtrtIOf\S
o Transferred Assets:
.
;,',",," ,:'i.-'~~ :1':';' Co'"",;,>",'''',?; "0 ;: ,;:' , ~'o:' ,',~ ",""'1' ,,}~.:':t:>;b~'Y:~";1 '.'
,.,
.....C,-.
'i,~\
,
^,
Investment Options
(Wed from other side)
I understand that amounts withdrawn from a GAA Term may be subject to a market value
adjustment prior to the maturity date of that Term as specified In the contract. I further
understand that Annuity payments and account values, If any, when based on the Investment
experience of a separate account, are variable and not guaranteed as to fixed dollar amounL
Dated at
this _ day of
19
CIty and State
WItness
Contract HoldermUe
Home otfIc;l!. use: Accepted .
Do you have any reason to believe any existing life insurance or annuity contracts will be modified or replaced.lf this
contract Is Issued?
Producer's Note
DYes
o No
Signature of Producer
Corrections and amendments (Home OffICe use only): Errors and omissions may be corrected by the
Company but no change in plan, classification, amount, age at issue, or extra benefits shall be made
without written consent of the Contract Holder (N1A in W. VA.).
.
.
Affix Prospectus
Receipt Here
For Master Applications Only
I hf'reby acknowledge receipt of an ,-\ccount C Group Deferred Variable Annuil)' prospectus dated May 1. 1998 for St'ction 457
Public EmPloyer Deferred Compensation Plans. as well as all current prospectuses pertaining to the variable investment options
avaiklble under the Contracts.
Please send an .-\ccount C Statement of Additional Information (Form So. S.-\L 75982-98) dated .\Ia)' 1. 1 <)98.
CONTRACf HOLDER'S SIGNATURE
DATE
PROS, 7~lClS~.llS
37
~...
";'-".:w_ ,',
'-',",' -
:1
.
.
.
JEtna
*'
?r.~
Application Form
Group Annuity Contracts
AetDa LIfe IDSUI'8DCC! and Annuity Company
151 Farmington Avenue,'Hanford, CT 06156-8022
Client Information
Account Information
.
Street City Hall
I ZIP C;:362
I State
WA
nue Code Of any) under wtIIch plan Is to qualify:
[J 457 Public Employer Cl Non-457 Tax-Exempt Deferred
Deferred Compensation Compensation (for select
management and highly
compensated employees.
Cl Optional Retirement Plan for Higher Education
Cl 403(b)- [J 401 (a)
o 403(b) for 501 (c)(3) OrganIZation
Tax-Deferred AnnuIty (OrgarizalIons formed after
1019169 must have IRS I\IUng regarding 501 (c)(3) status)
Cl Retirement PIUS [J HeaJthcar8 Retirement Plus
Cl VotuntaJy [J HeaJthcar8 Voluntary .
o 401 (8) for 501 (c)(3) OrganIzaUOn
Tax-Deferred AnnuIty (Orgarizatlons formed after
1019169 must have IRS I\IUng regarding 501(C)(3) status)
o Rellrement Plus [J Hea11hcar8 Retirement PlUS
Cl 401(k) for 501 (c)(3) Organization (OrgarUatlonS formed after
1019169 must have IRS I\I1Ing regardng 501 (c)(3) status)
Cl Retirement Plus [J HeaJthcar8 Retirement Plus
5. Is Ita contraCt sutlIect to ERISA TlUS 11
Cl Yes 11 No If yes, Plan annJversaJy Month _ Day_
17. ConIr1ICt Is 10 be: Is. Contract Etfec:tlveDate
Cl Allocated 11 UnaIIocated
9. GAA Maturtty Notices should be mailed to:
m Partldpants 0 Employer
10. Will Ita contract change or replace any
exIStIng Ofe Insurance or amulty contract?
o Yes tJ No
o 457 Tax Exempt Deferred
Compensation (for select
management and NghIy
compensated employ8es)
EO Other.
401(;:1)
Plan Begtnning Oate _
, -' 0 Participants & Employer
" yea, please provide Account Number
Can1erName
Oate to be
cancelled
1 1. Special Requests:
HeaJthcar8 501 (c)(3) Organizations:
WIthdrawal Fee: 0 10 year [J 5 year
Transfer Bonus: [J~,{, (Option A)
Other.
o None
Cl None (Option B)
Investment Options
.
12. PartJctpants may eJect the Investment allocation for:
~ Employer and Employee Contrlbutlons 0 Employee Contributions only 0 None. Contract Holder elects
13. For Employer directed alloCations: Enter the percentage of payment and the Investment option chosen
lor allocation purposes.
Cl Employer Modal Contributions:
o Employee Modal ContrtbutIons:
Cl Transferred Assets:
3QO.MOP.96
Investment Options
(Continued from other side)
Producer's Note
I understand that amounts withdrawn from a GAA Term may be subject to a market value
adjustment prior to the maturity date of that .Term as specified In the contract. I further
understand that Annuity payments and account values, If any, when based on the Investment
experience of a separate account, are variable and not guaranteed as to fixed dollar amount.
Dated at
this _ day of
19
CIty and State
Witness
Contract HolderffiUe
Home 0flI<;~ usa: Accepted
Do you have any reason to believe any eXISting life insurance or annuity contracts will be modified or replaced If this
contract Is Issued?
DYes
o No
Signature of Producer
Corrections and amendments (Home OffICe use only): Errors and omissions may be corrected by the
Company but no change in plan, classification, amount, age at issue, or extra benefits shall be made
without written consent of the Contract Holder (N1A in W. VA.).
Affix Prospectus
Receipt Here
'-~.
" ~;;
1'~
.
.
.
.....~~
,~
.
For Master ApPlications Only
I hereby acknowledge receipt of an Account C Group Deferred Variable Annuity prospectus dated Ala)' 1, 1998 for Section 457
Public EmplO)'er Deferred Compensation Plans, as well as all current prospectuses pertaining to the variable investment options
available under the Contracts.
Please sen.d an ,-\ccount C Statement of Additional Information (Form No. S.-\I.75982-98) dated ,\lay 1. 1998..
CONTRACT HOLDER'S SIGNATURE
DATE
. PROS. 'i:)9H~.YH
.
37
eORT,4~
~. ~
.~J
"Maintaining
and building
a better .
community"
Jack Plttis
Director [4801J
Phyllis Rasler
Administrative
Ass/stant [48ooJ
Cate Rinehart
Administrative
AssIstant [47ooJ
Bob Titus
Deputy Director [4701J
Ken Ridout
Deputy Director [4802J
Gary Kenworthy
City Engineer [4803J
Jim Harper
Electrical Engineer
[4702J
Tim Smith
~tract &. Project
~",.nISt1Btor [4804J
Lou Haehnlen
Sr. Bulldng Inspector
[4816}
Tom Sperl/ne
Sr. E/ectricallnspector
(4735)
Scott McLaJn
PrNffJf MatIM}8f [4703}
RIIIph EIbwotftI
Wal8f, Was/IBwal8f
CoIIecIioII
SlIpIlflnf8tId8n [455J
Pete Bunvtr
Equip SeMces
SupennfrJndBnt (435)
Marlc ~
Ught o,-a/JomJ
Manager (4731)
KBvin CuttIs
Tl88t. Plant
SuperMor [4845}
Tom McCabe
SW Collection
Sup8fVlsor [4876}
Stew Evans
.ndfllI Supervisor
73}
Daw WIlcox
Street Maintenance
- Supervisor [4825}
l1i~ \i~. . X II j~ 13,
MEMDRANDUM
.
~~i
DATE:
AUGUST 4, 1998
CITY MANAGE,R IBARRA, MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
TO:
JACK PITTIS, DIRECTOR PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AS LEAD
AGENCY FOR COORDINATING CLEAN UP OF RA VONIER MILL SITE
FROM:
SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATION: The 'attached resolution supports the Department of
Ecology as the lead agency in charge of clean up of the Rayonier.,MiII site, which we anticipate
would result in a more .timely cl~an up of the~i,te in ~mpliance with all environmental laws.
I recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution.
ISSUE: Should the City Council adopt thelattachedresolution supporting Department of
Ecology as the lead agency in charge of clean up of the Rayonier Mill site?
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The Economic Task Force, which has been closely following the demolition of the Rayonier
site has become aware of the difficulties related to a,timely solution of clean up efforts related
to the Rayonier mill site. The attached resolution would endorse the Department of Ecology
as the lead agency for site clean up. This endorsement does not compromise the efforts to
end up with an environmentally safe site.
Department of Ecology coordination rather than EPA would potentially place the use back into
use years sooner.
~.~~
Jack.:Pitti~_ '. .
DirE7ctor of ;public Works
...-/
JNP:jp .
Disk: N:\PWKS\ADMIN\RA VONIERIMEMO-CC:898
File: Rayonier Mill Closure
Attachments: Resolution
Copy: Chris AnderSon, POPA
187
.11
"f
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, urging the Washington State Department of Ecology
to retain lead agency status in the Rayonier Mill site contamination
clean up effort.
WHEREAS, Rayonier is willing and able to complete the demolition of the mill and clean
up or the mill site so that the property can be returned to productive use and support new
industry and jobs, and:
WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Ecology has been heavily involved in
the oversight of the clean up process and is capable of ensuring that the site is cleaned up to
standards established by the Model Toxics Control Act [MTCA], and;
WHEREAS, MTCA is more stringent in many areas than federal standards for clean up of
contamination, and;
WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] is investigating th
site for possible listing as a superfund site and would potentially replace the Department of
Ecology as the lead agency for oversight of the clean up process, and;
WHEREAS, the EPA has a history of creating significant delays in clean up efforts, and;
.WHEREAS, it is extremely important to the economic well being of the City of Port .
Angeles that this industrial property be returned to productive use as soon as possible and that
the environmental concerns of the community are'considered;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESO.L VED THAT the City of Port Angeles City Council urges
~
the Washington State Department of Ecology to retain lead agency status in the clean up effort of
Rayonier Mill and urges the United States Environmental Protection Agency to allow the State to
manage this cleanup and to an~ support the State's efforts.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 4th day of August. 1998.
ATTEST:
Gary Braun, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
NIPWKSIAOMIN\RA YONIERIOOE _ RE S .898
188
.
.
.
.~r~I~.:j:'?;f:~'1;P!'~:!,:~{:!:w~}> ]~:'~y,:~~'\t~;~1f'~~f:4}:'::";{;'
1f;11 "If
')
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
July 8, 1998
7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Linda Nutter, Fred Hewins, Cindy Souders, Mary
Craver, Dean Reed, Paul Ziakin
Members Excused:
Bob King
Staff Present:
Sue Roberds, David Sawyer, Dan McKeen, Gary
Kenworthy, Gale Turton, Tom Riepe
Public Present:
Theresa Schmid,. Marsha Pearson, Bob Bailey,
Kathleen Bailey, Bill Lindberg, Al Gustafson, Bob
Dudley
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Nutter moved to approve the June 24, 1998, minutes noting that
Commissioner Craver was present at the June 10, 1998, meeting. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Craver and passed 5 - 0, with Commissioner Souders
abstaining.
PUBLIC HEARING:
STREEr_--YACATlo.N_._PETITIOlL~TY.~98-.02~_.OL YMPIC
MEMORlALHOSPITAL,.3-portioll..ofthe...alley_hetween .Georgiana and
Caroline_directly_west of Chambers. (Continued from June 24, 1998.)
Planner Sawyer noted that Planning and Police staff had been directed to meet with the applicant's
representative, Bill Lindberg, following the June 24th hearing, to discuss a revised site plan
presented by Mr. Lindberg at the June 24th meeting. Staff met with Mr. Lindberg and agreed. to
recommend approval of the right-of-way vacation with six 'conditions to address the public safety
issues that were originally presented by the City's Police Department and testimony presented by
neighbors.
Sergeant Gale Turton of the City's Police Department responded to Commissioner Nutter's
questions regarding travel options in the alley at the present and if the vacation were approved. He
noted that his memo dated July 7, 1998, clarified the Police Department's comments and requests
that lighting be provided along the alley to increase visibility and direct traffic through the redirected
alley.
Gary Kenworthy, City Engineer, responded to Commissioner Nutter that the City will require an
ingress/egress easement rather than a dedication of the redirected portion of the alley (south to
Georgiana Street).
189
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 2
Chair Reed opened the public hearing.
Bill Lindberg, 319 South Peabody Street, represented the applicant and stated that he has worked
the past two weeks with staff to resolve any potential safety issues and will continue to work with
staff as necessary to resolve any outstanding issues. Lighting of the alley is not planned as the new
. parking lot will be lit and should provide enough illumination for safe travel through the alley.
Landscaping and issues will be addressed !o Planning staf( for approval.
There being no further testimony, Chair Reed closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Ziakin moved to recommend tha~ the City Council approve the right-of-way
vacation with the following conditions, citing the following findings and conclusions for that
action:
Conditions:
1.
The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Public Works
Department (Attachment B of the June 24, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for STY
98-02) which include construction of the' alley and street entrance to city standards including
drainage, closure of the vacated alley entrance, encasement of the sewer line in the vacated
alley, an ingress/egress easement to serve as access south to Georgiana Street (relocated
alley. The underground utility easement shall remain.
2.
The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Fire
Department (included in Attachment C of the June 24, 1998 Planning bepartment Staff
Report for STY 98-02) which require that the re-routed portion ofthe alley shall be provided
with an all weather surface meeting the City's specifications and that a fire hydrant is
provided at the intersection of Georgiana and Chambers Streets.
3. The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Police
Department included in their letter dated July 7, 1998, presented to the Planning
Commission July 8, 1998, which recommend~ that the west parking lot exit area be sufficient
in size to allow a full size police vehicle to 'make a right turn to continue westbound down
the alley, that arrow signs and a light at the comer showing the alley makes a turn south onto
Georgiana Street when travelling-east down the alley, and that street lighting be provided in
the alley west of the building. I
4. The street vacation shall not be finaled until a building permit is issued for the property
consistent with the revised site development plan (attached as Attachment A to the July 8,
1998 Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-02). .
5.
Final occupancy of any structures on the site shall not be allowed until the street vacation is
complete and all of the individual lots comprising the development site have been combined
into one legal building and zoning lot.
6.
Any costs associated with utility relocation and alley realignment shall be borne by the
applicant.
19n
.
{ -
.
.
.
.
.
"~;,i:t~(::)';;'\',€'AC'j'S..':""-i" ,,";: " - :;:'<:'," ; ",," , ''-";-'-;i'.,~'':~''-~-:_\-- -,'"
".;,.....:..,. "
:"; .:t...:.'.-.<,'....
..J~
"',~G;'
',-"-"
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. J 998
Page 3
Findings:
1. The applicant for the requested vacation is Olympic Memorial Hospital. The
application/petition is attached as Attachment A of the June 24, 1998 Planning Department
Staff Report for STY 98-02. .
2. The applicant revised the original site plan to address the .concerns of the Police Department.
The revised site plan kattached as Attachment A of the July 8, 1998 Planning Department
StaffR~port for STY 98-02.
3. The requested vacation is for that portion of the alley between Caroline Street and Georgiana
Street abutting Lots 1, 2, 16, 17, 18, and the east one-half of Lot 3 of Hart and Cookes
Subdivision of Suburban Block No. 31 in the Townsite of Port Angeles.
4. The street vacation is categorically exempt from threshold determination and Environmental
Impact Statement requirements per Section 197-11-800(2)(h) of the Washington
Administrative Code.
5. The subject right-of-way and adjoining properties are"currently designated on the City's
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as Commercial and zoned Commercial Office.
6.
Multiple utilities including sewer and electrical lines are located in the subject right-of-way.
7. The subject right-of-way is currently improved.
8. The PubJic Works, Fire, and Police Department's original comments "are included as
Attachments B, C, and D of the June 24, 1998, Planning Department Staff Report for STY
98-02.
9. As noted in their letter presented to the Planning Commission on July 8, 1998, the Police
Department's concerns, expressed in their letter dated May 19, 1998, have been adequately
mitigated to their satisfaction. ,0
Conclusions:
A. The Comprehensive Plan's Utilities and Public Services Policies C2 & 3 and Transportation
Policy B 18 as listed in the June 24, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-02
directly relate to the proposed vacation.
B. As conditioned, the proposed vacation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Utilities
and Public Services Policies C2 & 3 and Transportation Policy B 18.
c.
As conditioned, the proposed vacation will result in improved public health facilities in the
community.
D.
As conditioned, the proposed vacation will benefit the public health, safety and welfare.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hewins, and passed 6 - O.
191
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 4
PUBLIC MEETING:
.
REZONE APPI ,leA TION - REZ 98-03 NORTHWEST PERMIT, Ninth
Street between I jncoln and I.anrel Street: ~eqnest to rezone property
designated RS-7, Residential Single Family, to CSD, Community Shopping
District. (This item is continued from June 10, 1998.)
Commissioner Nutter stated that she has a friend who is a property owner in the area and
would stand down from the proceedings if requested to do so. No one objected and so she
remained.
Senior Planner Sawyer reviewed the Planning Department's staff report recommending
approval of the request.
City Engineer Kenworthy stated that the Eighth Street intersection is fully protected in that
left turns are made only with a left turn arrow. He explained that the difference between
fully protected versus permissive traffic signalization is that permissive signalization is a turn
at will situation. The City would rather have fully protected signalization at this intersection
for the present.
In response to Commissioner Reed, Mr. Sawyer affirmed that Conclusion "F" suggested by
staff concludes that if the property is not developed as proposed, it should be rezoned back .
to its residential designation.
Following lengthy discussion regarding the Washington State Department of
Transportation's comments as to access onto Lincoln (SR 101), it was determined that
whatever development occurs on the site would have to satisfy both the State's and the City's
concerns to proceed.
Commissioner Souders noted that the Planning Commission's discussion should be
concerned with the highest use that could develop on a CSD-zoned property and whether
those uses would be compatible at this locat!pn.
Planner Sawyer reminded the Commission that the rezone consideration is not for the entire
2.2 acre development proposal being presented by Northwest Permit, but only for the four
most southwesterly lots as the remainder of the properties are already zoned CSD. He added
that the environmental review performed for the rezone included the overall development
proposal as submitted by Northwest Permit, and if a significantly different development is
proposed, additional review under SEP A may result in different mitigation measures.
Engineer Kenworthy responded to Commission Ziakin explaining the difference between
average and seasonal traffic counts. Level of service (LOS) criteria are analyzed for average,
not seasonal, traffic counts. Seasonal LOS can drop below what is acceptable for the average
LOS. He responded to Commissioner Craver that he feels comfortable with the proposal and
the developer's ability to deal with the Department of Transportation's requirements for
development of the site. He further explained the information provided to the engineering
consultant used to formulate the requested traffic study of the Eighth/Lincoln Street
intersection and s'urrounding streets.
.
192
"-~,.
. ."",.
.' """~j .
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. J 998
Page 5
.
At Commissioner Souders' request, Planner Sawyer noted that mitigation measure No. 7 was
added to' the proposal's Mitigated Determination of Non Significance following the
public/agency comment period by the Planning Director. He agreed that these measures are
also addressed in the City's zoning/development standards for the CSD zone. The added
mitigation measure requires continued review by the City's SEPA Official ofthe project's
design, landscaping and screening features. He stated that as he understood the mitigation
measures, a separate SEPA review process for the project's building permit would not be
required tinless the original plans are significantly changed. Although he signed the reyised
MDNS as the Acting SEPA Official, Brad Collins is the City's SEPA Official, and was the
person who originally reviewed the project-and issued the original MDNS. Mr. Collins also
reviewed the subsequent public/agency comments and worded the additional mitigation
measure for the revised MDNS prior to leaving on vacation. Consequently, if the Planning
Commission is concerned with the SEP A decision, they may wish to confirm this
interpretation of the additional mitigation measure (No.7) with Mr. Collins following his
return. The impact of developing the four lots individually was not performed and if
proposed, may require further environmental review if the proposed development qualifies
for SEPA review.
.
Scott Grainger, Baldridge Group, 600 University #3012, Seattle, 98101, responded at the
request of Commissioner Hewins that if the project is required by the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to access onto Ninth Street instead of Lincoln
Street, the project would probably not go forward. Access onto Ninth Street would also fly
in the face of the neighborhood's objections.
Commissioner Ziakin summarized that there appear to be four key issues of concern: the
reduction of traffic safety; the issue of rezoning back to residential if the subject project does
not result as proposed; the WSDOT access issue onto Lincoln Street; and the impact of four
additional individual commercial lots being created on Ninth Street. He asked the applicant
about attempts to utilize available commercial properties.
Mr. Grainger responded that the subject property was not, and is not actively on the market.
Based on an in depth market analysis, the su~ject intersection was considered to be the best
site for the market to support the sales in the proposed commercial store. If the site is not
developable as proposed, Rite Aid will either remain at its existing Seventh/Lincoln Street
location, or close the store and channel business to the east side store. He explained what
criteria are used for site selection.
Commissioner Craver asked Mr. Grainger if Rite Aid has been working with WSDOT. Mr.
Grainger indicated that an accesspermit has been applied for but they have not begun talking
about mitigation measures. They are involved with approximately thirty projects state wide
with WSDOT and have an excellent working arrangement. If access onto Lincoln Street
cannot be obtained, he believes the project will not go forward.
.
Commissioner Reed wondered if, given the criteria of size, compatibility, direct benefit to
the owner/neighborhood, and isolation, could the proposal be considered a spot zone.
Planner Sawyer responded that in this case the contiguous CSD zone is being extended and
the proposal would not be a case of spot zoning.
19~
. ""~'f'
. ."?},~~ -
. /~:
..::,..
"i'~'-'$
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. J 998
Page 6
Commissioner Craver was concerned that if rezoned and not developed as intended, the
resulting four lots would impact the neighborhood far more than the proposed site
development.
.
Commissioner Souders was concerned that the traffic impacts to surrounding neighborhood
streets has not been addressed adequately at this point. The traffic report deals mainly with
the main arterials, Lincoln and Eighth Streets, but not enough analysis has been performed
oo-the neighboring streets. .
Commissioner Craver stressed that the professional traffic consultants and the City's
Engineering Division has reviewed the situation and has said that the resulting traffic
patterns will be acceptable and will not be affected with or without the project by the year
2000. Not being an expert on traffic, she feels that decision makers have to rely on those
who are skilled in dealing with traffic impacts.
In response to Commissioner Reed, as to what course of action would be taken if the site is
not developed as proposed, Planner Sawyer responded that, based upon Conclusion "F" in
staff s report, the Planning Commission could direct staff to schedule a rezone request on its
agenda for the four subject lots.
In response to Commissioner Nutter's statement that Eighth Street has been designated as
a cross town bicycle route but that no accomodation to designate the Eighth St~eet frontage .
of the site as such has been made, Engineer Kenworthy responded that bicycle lanes require
the elimination of parking. Given the width of Eighth Street at present, only the elimination
of parking along one side or the other would allow a designated bicycle lane.
Commissioner Craver summarized that the issue is whether this proposal presents a logical
location for commercial development or not.
Commissioner Hewins moved to recommend approval of the rezone as proposed citing
the following fil)dings and conclusions:
Findings:
Based on the information provided in the public record including the application file, the
staff report and its attachments, comments received during the public comment period, and
the Planning Commission's deliberation, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission
hereby finds:
1.
The applicant, Northwest Permit submitted the application to the Planning
Department on February 9, 1998. A Determination of Completeness was issued on
February 12, 1998, and the written public comment period initially ran from
February 12, 1998 to February 27, 1998. In response to public request, the public
written comment period was extended to March 6, 1998.
2.
The proposal is to rezone four lots (Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16 of Block 268 in the
Townsite of Port Angeles), approximately 28,000 square feet of property, from RS-7,
Residential Single Family to CSD, Commercial Shopping District (Attachment A to
. 194
.
.
.
.
,I",," ";:-'~;j~~-~t" ': ,-;-'.ic,;';i>'\'_.":,i~,/.f'~':':::::"\:'
.,..
')
,.,.;~
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 7
10.
the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated ~uly 8, 1998).
3.
The proposed rezone is part of the applicant's overall proposal to develop 90,000 s.f.
of the southwest corner of Lincoln Street and 8th Street (extending to 9th Street) with
an approximately 17,000 s.f. retail store. The overall proposal includes this rezone
request and a street vacation request. for the eastern portion of the EighthlNinth
Streets alley.
4.
As part. of the application's SEPA review, a traffic analysis was requested of the
applicant on February 13, 1998.
5.
On April 20, 1998, the Planning Department received a letter from the applicant
waiving the City's 120 day permit processing requirement due to the applicant's
delay in preparing the requested traffic analysis.
6.
On May 14, 1998, the Planning Department received the requested traffic analysis
and on June 3, 1998, the Planning Department received an addendum to the analysis
with comments regarding Ninth Street, Laurel Street, and the EighthlNinth Streets
alley.
7.
This application was originally scheduled for Planning Commission consideration
on March 11, 1998, atwhich time it was continued, due to lack of a traffic report and
a SEP A determination, to April 22, 1998. On April 22, 1998, it was again continued
for the same reason until June 10, 1998, at which time it was continued until July 8,
1998, to accommodate the resulting Mitigated Determination of Non Significance
(MDNS) required comment period.
8.
The SEP A Responsible Official issued a MDNS for the proposal on June 3, 1998
(Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July
8, 1998). The MDNS was mailed to all persons who submitted written comments
related to the applicant's environmental checklist, and the comment period for the
MDNS ran until June 19, 1998.
9.
On June 26, 1998, the City's SEP A Responsible Official re-issued the Mitigated
Determination of Non-Significance, with an additional mitigation measure requiring
certain development aspects of the project be subject to further review.
The public had an opportunity to comment on the proposal during the written
comment period provided which ran from February 12 to March 6, 1998. All of the
written comments received during this time are included as Attachment D to the
Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8, 1998. The issues
addressed include increased traffic on Ninth Street, potential crime, increased noise
and lighting, the general impact of the project on the Cherry Hill residential area, and
the availability of alternative commercial properties. \
11. The subject area is within the undesignated area between the Comprehensive Plan's
Commercial land use designation to the north and the Residential designation to the
19~
.,.~'_... .
. :""":
' """:
-~~:#r.l. <
:".:{~
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. J 998
Page 8
south. It is currently zoned RS-7.
.
12. The subject area is level and is currently developed with two single-family residences
and an unimproved parking lot used by a business located on property to the north
ofthe rezone area. The adjacent properties are developed with the following uses:
To the north:
To the south:
To the east:
To the west:
commercial uses; .
single family residences;
single family residence; and
single family residences.
I .
13. The adjacent properties are zoned as follows:
To the north:
To the south:
To the east:
To the west:
CSD;
RS-7;
CSD; and
RS-7.
14. The City's Comprehensive Plan identifies Lincoln Street as a principal arterial street
and Eighth Street as a minor arterial street.
15.
The traffic analysis noted the Eighth and Lincoln Street intersection currently
functions at an average level of service (LOS) D, and projected that in the year 2000
it will continue to function at an average LOS of D with and without the proposed
project.
.
16. The traffic analysis noted the Eighth and Lincoln Street intersection currently
functions at a seasonal level of service (LOS) E, and projected that in the year 2000
it will continue to function at a seasonal LOS ofE without the proposed project, and
a seaSonal LOS of F with the project as proposed. The report projects the
intersection will operate at a' seasonal LOS of E with the project if the project is
subject to the report's mitigation m~~ures.
17. The City Engineer reviewed the traffic analysis and recommended a revision to the
report's mitigation measures. With the project subject to the revised mitigation
measures, the City Engineer states the average LOS for the Eighth and Lincoln
Streets intersection will remain at D in the year 2000, and the seasonal LOS will
remain at E. '
18.
The Department of Transportation comments are included as Attachment E to the
Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8, 1998. They address
the impact of the overall project on the Lincoln Street and 8th Street intersection,
storm water issues, signage requirements, and a recommendation the proposed
development of the overall site be accessed from 9th Street instead of Lincoln Street
(SR 101).
.
196
.
.
.
,,'< ~',,':t~',., t-/:~:f"JL ';.',,:
,. "..
'...''111.....'..
~~,
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 1998
Page 9
Conclusions:
Based on the information provided in the public record incl~ding the application file, the staff report
and its attachments, written comments received during the public comment period, the Planning
Commission's deliberation, and the above findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission
hereby concludes: "
A. The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are most relevant to the proposal, Land
Use Policies Al and A2, Cl, Dl, and E7.
B. If the property is developed as part of the applicant's overall development plan as
described in Attachment A to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03
dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MDNS attached as
Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8,
1998, the rezone is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policies A 1 and A2, C 1, D 1,
and E7.
c.
If the property is developed as part of the applicant's overall development plan as
described in Attachment A to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03
dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MDNS attached as
Attachment B to the Plar.ning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8,
1998, the rezone is in the public use and interest and is compatible with the
surrounding zoning and land uses.
D. If the property is developed as part of the applicant's overall development plan as
described in Attachment A to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03
dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MONS attached as
Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8,
i 998, the rezone will result in an increase of economic activity in the City.
\.
E. If the property is not developed as part of the applicant's overall development plan
as described in Attaclunent A to the ~lanning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-
03 dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MONS attached as
Attaclunent B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8,
1998, the rezone could have a negative impact on adjacent residentially zoned and
developed properties along Ninth Street.
F. If the property is "not developed as part of the applicant's overall development plan
as described in Attaclunent A to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-
03 dated July 8, 1998 and mitigated in the project's revised MDNS attached as
Attachment B to the Planning Department Staff Report for REZ 98-03 dated July 8,
1998, the City should consider a rezone of the property back to RS-7.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Craver and passed 4 - 2, with
Commissioners Ziakin and Nutter voting in the negative.
Commissioner Ziakin stated that although he is in favor of commercial development, he does
not pelieve the rezone is in the best interest of the community due to a reduction in traffic
197
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 1998
Page 10
safety, creeping encroachment into the residential neighborhood, the access issue to Lincoln .
Street, and the impact of future commercial use of the four lots if the proposal does not go
forward. Commissioner Nutter agreed.
Chair Reed noted that the City Council will conduct a public hearing on July 21st, 7 p.m.
A ten minute break was called for at 9:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9: 1 0 p.m.
. PUBLIC HEARING:
STREET Y ACA TION PETITION - STY 98-01 NORTHWEST
PERMIT, a portion of the EighthlNinth Street alley between Lincoln and
Laurel Streets: A proposal to vacate right-of-way. (This item is continued
from June 10, 1998.)
Commissioner Nutter stated that she has a friend who is a property owner in the area and
would stand down from the proceedings if requested to do so. No one objected and so she
remained.
Planner Sawyer reviewed the Planning Department's staff report and responded to questions
regarding the staff report addendum which recommended approval if the Police
Department's concerns are met. Chair Reed asked Deputy Chief Tom Riepe to elaborate on
the Police Department's submitted memoranda.
Deputy Tom Riepe, Police Department, stated that although the Police Department initially
believed that the proposed alley vacation could result in a negative impact with regard to
response and observation practices by the Police Department, further analysis indicates that
the impacts which could result will not be significant enough to. recommend denial of the
vacation. Response activities could easily be routed along Ninth Street and observation
activities could still occur in the proposed parking area for the development. H~ appreciated
the Planning Department's concerns regarding the Police Department's initial
recommendation but cannot at this point see a major detriment to public safety as a result of
the vacation. The Police Department's initil!l response was submitted out of an obligation
to point out the practiced vehicular response patterns in the alley area but was not intended
to be the criteria upon which the decision to vacate or not to vacate would hinge. Further
review indicates that vacation of the alley may actually improve safety conditions in the area
which experiences a good deal of nuisance activities and complaints. Observation of
surrounding businesses would not be impacted by the proposal.
Chair Reed opened the public hearing.
.
Scott Grainger, Baldridge Group, 600 University #3012, Seattle, 98101, presented the
proposed development plan for the Northwest Permit/Rite Aid proposal planned for the
overall site. Substantial perimeter landscaping is planned as a buffer to the Ninth Street
residential area with additional landscaping on Lincoln and Eighth Streets. The development .
should enhance the appearance of the two main travel arteries, Lincoln and Eighth Streets.
The group supports the police staging needs in the parking lot area and will make every
effort to accommodate those public safety issues which is in their best interest as well as the
neighborhood. A thirty-six foot egress is proposed to Lincoln Street in the location where
198
'\>\ .- ': -,t~::'" .",\h~:~",,~
-;I
,
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. J 998
Page J J
.
only the existing twenty foot ingress/egress location exists at present.
Commissioner Hewins asked Mr. Grainger if the remaining alley, which would not be
vacated, would have access to the site. Mr. Grainger responded "no".
Theresa Schmid, 114 East Ninth Street, presented testimony that the City's recent practice
has been to vacate alleys to create large sites for development, she referenced the City's
Senior Center, the public library, the Safeway and Albertson's developments in support of
this conclusion. She opposes forcing alley through traffic use to surrounding streets. As a
resident of the neighborhood, she disagreed with the City's Engineering Department's
conclusions that traffic patterns in the area would not be negatively impacted. The traffic
already stacks up daily at peak times which can only increase if the proposal is approved.
The traffic report indicates that the level of service of the Eighth/Lincoln intersection is at
a level "D" at present which is not acceptable to her, and to further degrade that LOS is
completely unthinkable. She strongly recommended denial ofthe street vacation.
Nancy Van Sickle, 819 South Laurel Street, also a neighboring resident, agreed with the
previous speaker and requested denial of the street vacation. She stated that vacation would
only worsen traffic in the area and the development would create a new hang out for youth
in the new parking area.
.
Marsha Pearson, 118 East Ninth Street, a neighboring resident, believes that vacation of
the alley as proposed would eliminate the ability of the four lots r~quested for rezone along
with the alley vacation project (Lots 13, 14, 15, and 16) in this block to access the alley, thus
forcing all activity 'from those lots if developed individually, onto Ninth Street. It is not
acceptable to route any additional traffic onto Ninth Street. Neighbors in the area park on
the street, and the street is not wide enough to accommodate two way traffic when that
parking occurs.
Kathleen Bailey, 817 South Laurel Street, is in favor of the vacation as proposed. She is
sympathetic to her friends and neighbors in. the area, but feels that the continued use of the
Eighth/Ninth alley in this location as a fron!.age road to Eighth Street is too dangerous to
allow to continue. Two way traffic occurs in the narrow alley and loitering and commercial
truck activity is excessive. The Eighth and Lincoln intersection is a problem. There have
been commercial buildings in this location for over sixty years and the uses have by and
large been good neighbors. The proposal should greatly reduce the unwanted activities in
the alley and increase the safety of the residents. Typically large amounts of traffic are
routed onto neighborhood streets, not alleys.
.
Bob Bailey, 817 South Laurel Street, explained the damage that has occurred to his property
as a result of the intensity and speed at which vehicles travel through the alley to avoid the
intersection in this location. Commercial use of the alley as a result of the existing
businesses has resulted in damage to the alley surface and curbs. He believes that vacation
of the alley as proposed will result in an increase in safety of the alley residential uses and
will force commercial traffic to be more site specific. It will result in traffic use which now
occurs in the alley to be placed onto streets where greater traffic use is anticipated.
Vandalism should be greatly reduced due to the proposed development of the area. With or
without the proposed development, some type of traffic control needs to be implemented on
199
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 12
this alley. It is important that if the vacation is approved, the lots facing onto Ninth Street .
be closed to egress from the site development that is proposed.
Theresa Schmid, 114 East Ninth Street, asked if an emergency vehicle turn around would
be required at the west end of the alley if the vacation were approved.
, ,
Al Gustafson, 903 South Peabody, asked if this action is precedent setting. He owns
commercial property in the 200 block of Eighth Street which he would like to simihirly
develop and asked if this action would set the stage for that development. Planner Sawyer
responded that comments must be directed to the issue at hand, but noted that this would not
be a precendent setting situation.
Mr. Gustafson added that vacation of the alley is not a good idea. To develop the site such
that traffic now using the alley will be shifted to the neighboring street is improper. Safety
of the residents using the neighboring streets cannot be assured.
Bob Dudley, 106 East Ninth Street, enouraged the City to take a good look at the traffic
patterns in the area. He verified that Ninth Street is narrow with a good deal of on-street
parking, and the traffic is already congested. Additional traffic would be more difficult.
There being no further testimony, Chair Reed closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Nutter opened discussion regarding a turn around at the east end of the alley, .
were the west portion of the alley to be vacated.
Engineer Kenworthy responded that all of the site plan information that he has responded to
indicate that access will be available to the site from the east end of the alley, and the City
would be requiring an easement to ensure that access will not be hindered through to Lincoln
. Street. The Public Works Department will require such through access for site approval and
will not support a dead end alley. Alleys are basically intended for utility purposes and
secondary reside~tial access. They are not meant for vehicular through traffic. To maintain
the ease of these intended activities, it is preferred not to provide turnarounds but to loop
through those areas. "
Chair Reed agreed with the statement that there have been vacations approved that allowed
larger commercial site developments, as stated by a resident of the neighborhood. This is
true, however, each case is analyzed individually, and would not have been approved ifnot
found to be in the greater public interest~with sensitivity toward the individual areas
involved. He felt that future access to Ninth Street is protected from the site by condition
No.4, which provides that the vacation will not be finaled until a building permit can be
issued for the entire site, which would eliminate the possibility of the lots adjacent to Ninth
Street being developed independently of the current proposal. Although staffhas confirmed
that the intent of alleys is for utility and residential uses, the reality of it is that alleys,
particularly this alley, experiences a much more intensive use. That traffic will be using .
Ninth Street if this proposal is approved.
Commissioner Ziakin did not believe that the traffic situation/impacts have been analyzed
200
e
e
Ie
'0,>,,"",_'" .,:.\'; <'~:;'.:_'.'\',i\,{ '. ':'_-~''';>-'':'T':,',,~~'; ':':J~.~\'f~~:::V:'"
'.......1.'............
;--\-~:.
\: :'.:-'f::~"
';:;:,',
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 13
to everyone's satisfaction. He does not believe the applicant has provided enough
information for approval at this point.
Commissioner Hewins noted that the subject location is one of the most desirable
commercial intersections in town. The properties surrounding the intersection will
eventually be developed in a manner that will inevitably increase the already heavy traffic
in the area, and should be addressed in a serious manner. The City's Comprehensive Plan
establishes the area as a primary commercial area which will result in a majortrafffic
corridor.
Commissioner Craver felt that given the testimony verifying that the alley in this location
is heavily travelled by those visiting the various commercial uses which occupy the area at
present as well as those using the alley as a frontage road to avoid the intersection
congestion, development of the area from several businesses into one single commercial site
may actually reduce the congestion in the area somewhat. She noted that the applicant's
testimony indicates that the alley will not be continued through to the parking lot, but the site
information presented for review indicates through access.
, Chair Reed again noted that closure of the alley will force the traffic uses to the side streets,
and was not comfortable with that impact.
In response to Commissioner Souders, Planner Sawyer noted that he believes the applicant's
site plans are dependent on the street vacation. Furthermore, he stated that staff would have
difficulty recommending approvalpfthe accompanying rezone proposal without the street
vacation due to the fact that without the added right-of-way area the commercial site would
be bisected by the alley.
Commissioner Nutter moved to deny the proposed street vacation petition citing the
following findings and conclusions:
Findings:
.'
I. The applicant for the requested vacation is Northwest Permit. The petition is
attached as Attachment A of the July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for
STV 98-01.
2. The requested vacation is for that portion of the alley between 8th Street and 9th
Street abutting Lots 1-6 and 13-18 of Block No. 268 in the Townsite of Port Angeles.
3. The street vacation is categorically exempt from threshold determination and
Environmental Impact Statement requirements per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the
Washington Administrative Code.
4. The subject right-of-way and abutting properties fall within the undesignated area
between the Comprehensive Plan's Commercial land use designation to the north and
/ its Residential designation to the south. The majority of the abutting properties are
zoned Commercial Shopping District (CSD) with four of the properties currently
201
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 14
zoned Residential, Single-Family (RS-7).
.
5. The Public Works Department has indicated a 24" sanitary sewer main and overhead
electrical lines are located in the alley and will need to be relocated if the vacation
is approved.
6. The subject right-of-way is currently impro:ved.
7.
The Public Works, Fire, and Police Department's comments are included as
Attachments B, C, and D of the July 8, 1998, Planning Department Staff Report for
STY 98-01. .
I .
8. The Police Department originally submitted written public safety concerns related
to the proposed vacation. These concerns include the current use of the alley for
traffic diversion in the event of an accident at the 8th Street and Lincoln Street
intersection, the use of the alley by officers in response to calls from the bank located
at the comer of 8th Street and Oak Street, and t~e use of the alley for access to and
observation of the 24 hour retail/gas station use at the comer of 8th Street and
Lincoln Street.
9.
At the July 8, 1998, Planning Commission meeting, the Police Department's
concerns were further explained. Deputy Chief Tom Riepe stated that the July 7,
1998, memorandum from the Police Department was intended to point out issues for
consideration but the concerns do not warrant denial of the proposed vacation.
.
Conclusions:
A. The Comprehensive Plan's Utilities and Public Services Policies C2 and 3 and
Transportation Policy ,B 18 are the most relevant to the proposed vacation.
B. Based on neighborhood traffic concerns including the use of the alley for public
safety purposes, the proposed v~cation is not consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. .
C. Based on the Police Department's comments and stated use of the alley for public
safety purposes, the Planning Commission concludes that the proposed vacation may
have an impact on public health, safety and welfare.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Ziakin and deadlocked 3 - 3, with
Commissioners Reed, Nutter, and Ziakin voting for the motion, and Commissioners
\
Hewins, Craver, and Souders voting against the motion.
Commissioner Hewins stated that he did not believe the vacation will have an adverse impact
on the surrounding neighborhood. Reorientation of traffic patterns in the alley will result in .
the direction of traffic through to Eighth Street. The project, not the vacation, may result in
an increase in traffic to Ninth Street.
202
.
.
.
-,'~','-,' 'i ""~~;:::1;1~';,".;~:;~;J"'" .
~<t~
'.- .
'""-::
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 1998
Page 15
Commissioner Craver restated her belief that the consolidation of the uses at this corner may
ease the impact to the neighborhood and the alley.
Chair Reed reiterated that his primary reason for voting to deny the vacation is due to the
public testimony that traffic volumes along Ninth Street during rush hour traffic exceeded
that which was suggested by the consultant's report and that the proposed vacation would
aggravate that situation.
When ~ked to comment on the traffic impact,' Engineer Kenworthy again noted that t;llleys
are not intended or developed for heavy, through traffic use. He is comfortable with the
proposal and vacation of the alley subject to the conditions recommended:
The Commission took a short recess at 11 :00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 11 :05 p.m.
The Commission discussed traffic concerns and potential traffic patterns at length.
Commissioner Ziakin noted that he would abstain from voting on the issue because he does
not believe enough information has been presented to vote fairly. Staff responded, at the
direction of the Chair, that the Commissioners should endeavor to vote one way or the other.
If the Commission cannot break a deadlock, the issue would have to be passed on to the City
Council as such.
Engineer Kenworthy responded to Commissioner Hewins that the traffic consultant provided
additional information at his request which concluded that, following their analysis as traffic
engineers, the additional traffic to Ninth and Laurel Streets would not be significant. Mr.
Kenworthy agreed that there will be impacts and increases, but they would not significantly
affect the level of service.
Commissioner Nutter stated that she can't give credence to the traffic engineering study.
prepared by the traffic consultants because it is too vague. Testimony received by the
neighborhood does not support the traffic consultant's conclusions.
,"
Commissioner Souders noted that her vote against the motion was because the facts
presented by staff in recommending denial of the vacation cannot be supported without the
Police Department's concerns. -Staff noted in the report that if the Police Department's
concerns could be mitigated the recommendation would be for approval.
Commissioner Craver believed that significant weight should be given to the traffic
consultant's report because the authors are trained in traffic matters and are professionals
in their field, where the individual Planning Commission members are not traffic experts.
She has to assume that reports presented by specialists in a specific field should be given
particular weight in a final decision.
Commissioner Ziakin believed there are glaring gaps in the information provided.
Chair Reed pointed out the options available at this juncture and encouraged the Commission
to try to forward a clear recommendation to the City Council.
20~
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 16
Commissioner Hewins agreed with Commissioner Craver that the requested traffic .
information had been provided and the City's Engineer had reviewed it and agreed
with the conclusions. He then moved to approve the vacation as proposed citing the
following six conditions, ten findings and four conclusions:
Conditions'
L The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Public
Works Department (Attachment B of the July 8, 1998 Planning bepartment Staff
Report for STY 98-01) which require that a twenty-four inch sanitary sewer main
will need to be relocated. A twenty foot wide access and utility easement shall be
required.
2. The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Fire
Department (Attachment C of the July 8, 1998, Planning Department Staff Report
for STY 98-01) which requires that through access shall be maIntained at the west
end of the vacated Eighth/Ninth alley. The access shall be a minimum of twenty feet
in width and shall consist of an all weather surface meeting the City's Public Works
Department specifications. An approved turn around meeting the City's
specifications may be approved at the east end of the remaining Eighth/Ninth alley
in lieu of through access.
3.
The street vacation shall not be finaled until a building permit is issued for the
property consistent with'the revised site development plan (Attachment A to the July
8, 1998, Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-01).
.
4. Final occupancy of any new structures on the site shall not be allowed until the street
vacation is complete and all of the individual lots comprising the development site
have been combined into one legal building and zoning lot. -
5. . Any costs associated with utility relocation and alley realignment and/or
improvements shall be borne by the. ilPplicant.
Findings:
1. The applicant for the requested vacation is Northwest Permit. The petition is
attached as Attachment A of the July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for
STY 98-01.
2. The requested vacation is for that portion of the alley between 8th Street and 9th
Street abutting Lots 1-6 and 13-18 of Block No. 268 in the Townsite of Port Angeles.
3.
The street vacation is categorically exempt from threshold determination and
Environmental Impact Statement requirements per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the
Washington Administrative Code.
.
4. The subj~ct right-of-way and abutting properties fall within the undesignated area
204
':".) '"".r;. ;.",
71"
':'."".,
">
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 17
. between the Comprehensive Plan's Commercial land use designation to the north
and its Residential designation to the south. The majority of the abutting properties
are zoned Commercial Shopping District (CSD) with four of the properties currently
zoned Residential, Single-Family (RS-7).
.
Conclusions:
C.
.
D.
5.' The Public Works Department has indicated a 24" sanitary sewer main and overhead
electrical lines are located in the alley and will need to be relocated if the vacation
is approved.
6. The subject right-of-way is currently improved.
7. The Public Works, Fire, and Police Department's comments are included as
Attachments B, C, and D of the July 8,1998 Planning Department Staff Report for
STY 98-01.
8.
The Police Department originally submitted written public safety concerns related
to the proposed vacation. These concerns include the current use of the alley for
traffic diversion in the event of an accident at the 8th Street and Lincoln Street
intersection, the use of the alley by officers in response to calls from the bank located
at the comer of 8th Street and Oak Street, and the use of the alley for access to and
observation of the 24 hour retail/gas station use at the comer of 8th Street and
Lincoln Street. -
9.-
As noted in their presentation to the Planning Commission on July 8, 1998, the
Police Department's concerns expressed in a letter dated February 23, 1998, attached
as Attachment D of the July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-
01) do not warrant denial of the proposed vacation.
10. On May 14, 1998, .the Planning Department received a traffic analysis' for the
applicant's overall development plan which includes the proposed street vacation.
On June 3, 1998, the Planning Department received an addendum to the analysis with
comments regarding Ninth Street, Lyurel Street, and the Eighth and Ninth Streets
alley. .
A. The Comprehensive Plan's Utilities and Public Services Policies C, 2 and 3 and
Transportation Policy B 18 are the most relevant to the proposed vacation.
B. As conditioned, the proposed vacation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's
Utilities and Public Services Policies C, 2 and 3 and Transportation Policy B 18.
As conditioned, the proposed vacation will not have an adverse impact on the public
health, safety and welfare.
As conditioned, the proposed vacation will benefit the community's economic
development as well as the general public health, safety and welfare.
205
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 18
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Craver and passed 3 - 2 with .
Commissioners Hewins, Souders, and Craver voting in favor, Commissioners Nutter
and Reed voting in the negative, and Commissioner Ziakin abstained.
Those who voted against the motion restated their original objections, and Commissioner
Ziakin's abstention was due to the desire for ~dditionaltraffic information.
Chair Reed stated that the City Council will hold a publi~ hearing on this item at its July' 21,
1998, meeting, which will begin at 7:00 p.m.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Marsha Pearson, who provided testimony during the public hearing, stated that this is one
of the highest walking neighborhoods in the community. This fact should be given
significant import when dealing with issues that will cause an increase in vehicular traffic.
Theresa Schmid, 119 East Ninth Street, noted that the issues presented before the
Commission are complicated in nature and the process is very confusing. Citizens are not
given a fair opportunity to comment because the comment periods specified by ordinance
are not long enough to formulate an educated response. Neighbors in the area under
consideration were concerned enough to reschedule their education and physical health needs
in order to be in attendance at the meeting/hearing.
.
Commissioner Craver responded that the Planning Commission wholeheartedly appreciates
the efforts of citizens who take the time to present testimony and respond to issues of
concern. The intention of the Planning Commission is to plan for the whole community and
in the best interests of its citizens.
ST AFF REPORTS
Commenting-on:the statement that was made by Mrs. Schmid regarding the opportunity for
public comment prior to a meeting, Plann~r Sawyer noted that in this. particular issue
members of the neighborhood made note of their need for additional time to present
additional comments and staff was happy to comply by extending the original comment
period as requested by the spokesperson, Mrs. Schmid. A specific public comment period
is identified in order to keep the application process moving, and, only in cases where the
Planning Commission does not hold a public hearing is the time period for submission of
public comment restricted. Staff previously informed Mrs. Schmid and others who
expressed interest that only the Planning Commission would be a closed record meeting.
The City Council's deliberation would be a full public hearing which would provide ample
opportunity to present additional written and verbal comment for that hearing.
Brad Collins, the Planning Director, would be returning from vacation on July 13th.
.
206
.
.
.
r-'.;j-)".;" \''''(>_,",<,~,:-,~,:'. '~._-_ ., -":~:i\071''';'-'-;:'''~~F~ti:''.'k<
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8. 1998
Page 19
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
.~
;~1
, .,~....;
Commissioner Nutter asked staff to revi~w opportunities for the public to be able to provide
comment for a more lengthy time period prior to Commission actions in situations where the
Commission is not the hearing body.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 11 :40 p.m.
David Sawyer, Acting Secretary
PREPARED BY: S. Roberds
Dean Reed, Chair
207
-
I- .".._
.
( .
.
.
208
.
.
.
<,,:~ ~~, '.
;j",",\-,"';.,;.
.J
.,.
)' /11
H'
.~!f
-,it.
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
July 28, 1998
Special Meeting
5:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Fredric Hewins, Cindy Souders, Dean Reed, Mary
Craver
. Member Excused:
Linda Nutter, Paul Ziakin, Bob King
Staff Present:
David Sawyer
. Public Present:
Bill Hermann, Gene Unger
APPROV AL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Souders moved to approve the July 8,1998, minutes as submitted. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Craver and passed unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING:
STREET Y ACA TION PETITION - STY 98-03 HRRMANN, a portion of the
SecondfThird Street alley in Block 49, Townsite of Port Angeles: A proposal to
vacate right-of-way.
Senior Planner David Sawyer reviewed the Planning Department's staff report. Chair Reed
opened the public hearing.
Gene Unger, 1401 West Seventh Street, concurred with the staff report and requested that
the Planning Commission recommend approval of the right-of-way as requested.
..~.
There being no further questions, Chair Reed closed the public hearing. .
Commissioner Hewins moved to recommend that the City Council approve the
vacation as proposed with two conditions, citing the following findings and conclusions:
Condition of Approval:
I.
. The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Public
Works Department included in Attachment C of the July 22, 1998 Planning
Department Staff Report for STY 98-03.
2.
The proposed street vacation is subject to the conditions of approval required by ESA
97 -01 included in Attachment B of the July 22, 1998 Planning Department Staff
Report for STY 98-03. .
209
.. ,
Findings:
1.
The applicant for the requested vacation is William Hennann, the application/petition
is attached as Attachment A of the July 22, 1998, Planning Department Staff Report
for STY 98-03.
2.
The requested vacation is for that portion of the alley between Marine Drive and
Third Street abutting Lots 1-8 and 13-20, Block 49 in the Townsite of Port Angeles
identified in Attachment A of the July 22, 1998, Planning Department' Staff Report .
for STV 98-03
3
The City's SEPA Responsible Official issued an Adoption of Existing Environmental
Document on June 10, 1997, for the proposed vacation which is Included in
Attachment B of the July 22, 1998, Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-0:-;
4.
An Environmentally Sensitive Areas Approval (ESA 97-01) was approved for the
proposal on March 7,1997, which is included in Attachment B of the July 22, 1998,
Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-03.
The subject right-of-way and adjoining properties are currently designated on the
City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as Industrial (1) and Open Space (OS) and
are zoned Industrial. Lighl (IL) and Public Buildings and Parks (PBP). The portion
of the properties that contain the marine bluff is the area zoned PBP while the
majority of the propenics, which is the area to the north of the marine bluff are zoned
ll...
5
6 An electrical transmission line is lQcated in the subject righl-of-way
7 The Public Works, Fire and Police Department's comments are included as
Attachments C. 0, and E of the July 22,1998 Planning Department StaffRepo.rt for
STY 98-03
Conclusions
A The Comprehensive: Plan Land Use Policies 03, H I and 4 as listed in the July:::
1998, Planning Dcpanmeni Staff Report for STV 48-03 directly relate to lhl'
proposed vacation
B As presently Impruvcd, public use of the alley is cxtrcmely limited
C. As conditioned, the proposed vacation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan~
Land Use Policies 03, HI and 4.
D. As conditioned, the proposed vacation will allow improved use of the adjacent
commercial site wilh improved site design.
E
As conditioned. the proposed vacation will not have an adverse impact on the pubhc
health, safety and welfare
<l';'c'-
.
.
.
21.0
I -
1':,:~';""'.'i?i";-;:"~"lY.,,,-
-.-.
_ -.t:i'li\c'i f~. ~:~ i!:~"''''''~'~C;i!'',
-~T'___
' ~,-,- ?'-
,;tc,.
--~
.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Craver and passed unanimously.
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT - SMA 98-04 - FAIRES._832
Boath~nD.1:ITe..AproPQsaLtQ-IeconstrucLan_existing.warehQuse.sffi1cture in the ill.
Industrial Heavy zone.inJhe City's shoreline area. -
(Continue to August 12,1998.)
Chair Reed opened the public hearing and continued the issue to the Commission's regular
meeting of August 12, 1998.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
- ~
None.
ST AFF REPORTS
None
. REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
None
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m._
David Sawyer. Secretary
Dean Reed. Chair
PREPARED BY ~ Roberds
.
211
212
.
.
.
.s
"Maintaining
and building
a better
community"
, Jack Plttis
Director (4801)
Phyllis Rasler
Administrative
Ass/stant (4800J
Cafe Rinehart
AdmInistrative
Ass/stant (4700J
Bob Titus
Deputy Director (4701J
Ken Ridout
Deputy Director (4802J
Gary Kenworthy
City Engineer (4803J
Jim Harper
EIectrlc81 Engineer
(4702J
Tim SnWth
e:tract & Projact
nJstr8tor (4804J
Lou Haehnlen
Sr. Bulldng Inspector
(4816J
Tom Sper1Ine
Sr. ElactrlcallMpecfor
(4735J
. Scott McLaJn
Power Manager (4703J
Ralph EIIswotfh
W8/W, W851i1M'8/W
CoIIecI1on
SupMtIt8nd8nt (4855}
Pete Butretr
EquIp. SeMces
Superlnfendent (4835J
Marll Shanl>
Upht Operal1ons
Manager (4731J
Kevin CUJ1js
Treat Plant
Supervisor (4845J
Tom McCabe
SW CoIIecI1on
Supervisor (4876J
Stew EvallS
III/JIf.:II Supervisor
.,73J
Dave Wilcox
SI7Bet Maintenance
- SUpeMsor (4825J
c/~ /1;.
MEMORANDUM
. ,'i~~..~..1
.' ..1
"'," I
..
DATE:
JULY 21, 1998
MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
TO:
JACK PITTIS, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO PUD WHOLESALE WATER CONTRACT
FROM:
SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATION: The attached extension of the PUD wholesale water
contract will adjust the wholesale rate and include the new rate established for the additional
delivery point while maintaining the current conditions of the contract. The Public Works
Department recommends that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the contract
extension with the PUD. ..
ISSUE: Should the City extend the current wholesale water contract with the PUD for an
additional 12 months?
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The current contract expires on August 23, 1998. This contract
contained provisions for the development of an additional delivery location in our low zone.
This delivery point is of benefit to both the PUD and the City in that it will reduce the demand
for water from our upper system. The construction necessary for the development of this
additional delivery point has been completed successfully and a future agreement will be
needed to address the transfer of the piping and. customers from the PU D to the City, but this
will be covered in a separate agreement.
We have continued to meet with the PUD on issues related to mutual benefits such as
equipment maintenance, purchasing and other issues. The attached memo from August 19,
1997 is the background from the previous extension granted in 1997.
This new agreement establishes the rates a rate of $0.71 per 100 cubic feet for water
delivered from the upper system (The old rate was $0.68 per 100 cubic feet) and a rate of
. $0.68 per 100 cubic feet for water delivered from the lower system. (This rat~ is lower because
of less pumping needed fOr,delivery at this point) The previous maximum flows for the upper
system remain and weretairi the option to adjust rates based upon a cost of service.
The extension is for a period of 12 m.Qnths due to the unsettled nature of the decisions needed
for service delivery within the UGA east of the City.
\
J
JNP:jp
Disk:N:\PWKS\WA TER\PUDRA TE\EXT _898WPD
File: Agreement: PUD Water Contract
Attachments: Memo of August 19, 1997
Copy: Ralph Ellsworth
213
"(J J-;f;A
AMENDMENT TO ~.A 1/1-/'1'6 .
WHOLESALE WATER CONTRACT ~~~
This amendment to the Wholesale Water Contract dated January 9,
1995 is made and entered into by and between the City of Port
Angeles, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "City", and
the Public utility District No. 1 of Clallam County, a municipal
corporation, he~einafter called the ~District."
Whereas, the City and the District are parties to a wholesale
water contract, which is in effect until January 9, 1998; and
Whereas, the City and the District have entered into a separate
intergovernmental memorandum of understanding, in which they have
agreed to investigate opportunities for cooperative and coordinated
local area utility planning and operation; and
Whereas, the City and the District have agreed to extend the
wholesale water contract through August, 1999;
Now, Therefore, the City and the District hereby agree that the
Wholesale Water Contract dated January 9, 1995 shall be amended as
follows:
1. Paragraph 1. Rates and Water Use Limits is hereby amended to
read as follows:
.
A. The District shall pay seventy-one cents ($0.71) per 100
cubic feet per month, beginning with the billing cycle starting
August 24, 1998 and ending August 23, 1999 at. the Gales Addition
Reservoir. The District shall strive to maintain an average
withdrawal rate less than four hundred gallons per minute (400 gpm).
The days when peak withdrawal may exceed four hundred gallons pe~
minute (400 gpro) shall be limited to six "(6) days per year and at no
time shall the District use water at a rate greater than six hundred
gallons per minute (600 gpm).
B. The District shall pay sixty-eight cents ($0.68) per 100
cubic feet, beginning with the billing cycle starting August 24, 1998
and ending August 23, 1999 for lower zone purchases at Baker Street.
C. The District agrees to inform the City, within twenty-four
(24) hours, whenever its withdrawal rate at Gales Addition exceeds
four hundred gallons per minute (400 gpm).
D. The City shall have the option to annually adjust the rate
for the future billing cycles consistent with its cost of service
studies.
i
.
1
214
1--
.
.
.
~"?"V~ir~,,~~""t;t'i~;'~~ __ "/B::~~'~Y'Yrr.~~!:t;;~~~~'i?;
2. Paragraph 2. Other Conditions, paragraphs J and K are hereby
amended to read as follows:
J. The City has provided an interconnection north of Highway
101 opposite DelGuzzi Drive.
K. The District has provided a meter installation along Baker
street north of Highway 101.
4. Paragraph 4~ Termination is hereby amended to read as follows:
This contract shall terminate on August 23, 1999 or upon 60 days
written notice by either party, whichever is earlier.
DATED this
day of August, 1998.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1
OF CLALLAM COUNTY
President
Gary Braun, Mayor
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
Becky Upton, City Clerk
Secretary
APPROVED.AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
A: f'.;:'''A!~l:l.C'T:fi
2
215
~
... ~
~~
"Maintaining
and building a
better
community"
Jack Plttfs
Director [4801J
Phytlls Rasler
AdmInistrative
Assistant [4805J
cata Rinehart
AdmInistrative
AssIstant [47ooJ
Bob Titus
Deputy Director [4701 J
Ken Ridout
Deputy Director [4802J
Gal)' KenWOfthy
City Engineer [4803J
Stwa Hursh
Engineering Manager
[4702J
Tim Smith
Contract & Project
AdmInJsb'IJlor [4804J
Lou Ha9hnJen
Sr. BuI~ng InspecIor
(4816J
Tom Spet1Ine
Sr. EIect11clIIInspecIor
(4735J
Scoff McL.Mn
Power Manager (4703J
RtJIph EIIswotfh
Waller. ~
Co/IecfIon
SupetlnMndIwII (4855J
PeIe 8umJtr
Equip. s.-
Supet1...ldlllfl' (4835J
MMll ~
LJoh' 0p8ralJ0nI
MaMger {4731 J
Ken MaIlle
Consetvlttbl Manager
[4711 J
KevIn Cutfia
Treat Plant
Supervisor [4845J
Tom Mccabe
SW Collection
Supervisor [4876J
Stwa Evana
_ LandfIll SUpervt80f
[4873J
MEMORANDUM
.,.v~.. .
,'."~
. .:,
.~'"-
"..~
DATE: AUGUST 19, 1997
TO:
FROM: JACK PITTIS, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: PUD WHOLESALE WATER CONTRACT EXTENSION
.
SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATION: An extension of the PUD wholesale water cOlltract
will provide the City with and opportunity to adjust the whole.sale rate and develop and
additional delivery point while maintaining a dialog about future services issues in the Urban
Growth Area. The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council authorize
the Mayor to sian the contract extension with the PUD.
ISSUE: Should the City extend the current wholesale water contract with the PUD for 8
months? .
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In January 1995 the City and the PUD executed the current
wholesale water contract. That contract was good for three years. A copy of that contract is
attached for your information. Paragraph #1 of the contract provided that the City could pass
on cost of service adjustments for future billing cycles of Aug. 24,1995 - Aug. 23,1996 and
Aug. 24, 1996 - Aug. 23, 1997 but did not deal with Aug. 24, 1997 to the end of the contract.
We have passed on our cost of service adjustment for the previous cycles but have not
adjusted the PUD rate in the newest rate adjustment, since the contract does not provide.
such an increase.
The PUD understands that when we are able to adjust the rates in January 1998 with a new
contract that rate will reflect catching up to the revenues lost during the Aug. 1997 to Jan.
1998 period. The PUD would prefer to maintain reasonable rate adjustments rather than
larger jumps in rates and therefore agrees that an adjustment now and extension in time of
8 months is appropriate.
We met with the PUD on August 5th to begin our discussions about the wholesale contract
and other issues related to Growth Management and utility service for the Urban Growth Area
east of the city. The first issue was. !he discussion of this contract extension.
In addition, we discussed the low zone intertie. This new connection along US 101 at about
Del Guzzi Drive would provide about 230 gallons per minute to the PUD service area. This
would reduce the amount needed to be served from the upper service area which has
reservoir capacity problems. We favor this additional connection because of the ability to
provide more reliable water supply and at a reduced rate since the water is not pumped the
additional about to get it to the connection as is the case for the upper system. The Finance
Department has determined that water delivered at the low zone connection can be provided
at a rate of $0.64 per 100 cubic feet which is $0.03 per 100 cubic feet lower than the upper
zone rate established in the recent cost of service. We have met with the Utility Advisory
Committee who have recommended that the contract extension and rate adjustment be
approved.
.
by Jack Pittis
Director of Public Works
JNP:jp
Disk: N:\PWKS\WA TER\PUDRA TE\EXT _897.WPD
File: Agreements - PUD Wholesale Water Contract
Attachments: Old Contract, Contract extension
216
Jack Plttls
Director {4801]
PhytliS Ras/er
Administrative '
Assistant {4800]
Cate Rinehart
Administrative
Assistant {4700]
Bob Titus
Deputy Director {4701]
Ken Ridout
Deputy Director {4802]
Gary Kenworthy
City Engineer {4803]
Jim Harper
EIec/rlca1 Engineer
{4702J
Tim Smith
~tract & Project
~._nlstnJtor {4804J
Lou Haehn/en
Sr, Building Inspector
{4816J
Tom Spenme
S, EIec/rlcallnspector
(4735J
Scott MeUm
Power MIJTI4f1f1f [4703]
R a/Ol1 EllswortII
.Valet', Waslewalet'
Co/lectJon
Supeool8tld9nt {4855J
PeIe Bufl'8tt
EQUIp SenIoces
Supeool8nOlHll {48J5J
~arIr S~
U'JIII Operal1OflS
ManIfger [4 731 J
K8vm Cur1Js
T f'9IJt Plant
Supervrsor {4845J
Tom MeC8be
SW Co/lectJon
Supervrsor {4876J
Steve Evans
tlndfllI Sup6l'Vlsor
73J
ave Wilcox
Street Maintenance
Supervrsor {4825J
,;-<,--,..~:,;",,., .~ .,-:~_"'~:'":v~;~~~;:'sil'~i~-~'-,"
O't'/~\ 0-
MEM~bRANDUM
,11
"'I:
t
DATE:
JULY 21, 1998
MAYOR BRAUN AND CITY COUNCIL
JACK PITTlS, DIRECTOR OF PUBUC WORKS AND UTlUTIES
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH TRANSIT AND PORT ANGELES DOWNTOWN
ASSOCIATION FOR PO,RT ANGELES INTERNATIONAL GATEWAY
TRANSPORTATION CENTER [Gateway]
SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATION: On May 26th, 1998 a joint meeting of the Clallam Transit System
, Board and Port Angeles City Council was held regarding the downtown Gateway.Project. The next
phase of the project will include ,an environmental assessment and design of the project leading to
soliciting bids for project construction. At the Council meeting of June 2nd staff from both agencies
recommended that an interlocal agreement be drafted to outline the roles and responsibilities related
to our interagency partnership toward construction and operation of the Gateway. At that meeting the
Council authorized the preparation of the attached Interlocal Agreement. We recommend that the City
Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement with Clallam Transit and the
Downtown Association to identify the roles and responsibilities related to the design of the
Gatewav Proiect.
ISSUE: Should the City Council approve the Interlocal Agreement for the management of the Gateway
Project?
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On May 26th, 1998 the downtown Gateway Project was discussed at a joint
meeting of the Clallam Trdnsit System Board and Port Angeles City Council. In attendance from the City
were Mayor Braun. City Councilmen Wtggins and Williams, Interim City Manager/Public Works Director
Pittis, City Attorney Knutson, Planning Director Collins, and Project Administrator Smith. The purpose
of the joint meeting was to discuss the next steps in development of the Gateway Project. The City
Council and Transit Commission were provided with materials and staff presentations covering the
history and current status of the project. together with known issues relative to the next phase of
development. The next phase will include an environmental assessment and design of the project
leading to soliciting bids for project construction. Staff from both agencies have recommended that an
interlocal agreement between the two agencies be drafted to outline the roles and responsibilities related
to our interagency partnership for the design of the Gateway. During the drafting of the agreement, we
added the Downtown Association as a signatory and included two members of the Association on the
Review Committee.
The key points of the agreement are: ..
1. This agreement utilizes the strengths of both agencies to deal with the complicated requirements
of our funding partners. especially the Federal Transportation Administration.
2. City will be lead agency so far as the Transportation Improvement Board Funds
3. Transit will be lead agency so far as the Federal Transportation Administration Funds
4. The Port Angeles Downtown Association is included as a signatory to the agreement. as their input
and buy-in is important to the overall success of the project.
5. A revised total project cost will be completed prior to completion of design and will be included in
the approval of the final design by all parties.
6. A Review Committee is established with two City Council members [appointed at the 7 (! meeting
and are Cathy McKeown and Glenn WlQgins), two Transit Board members (Carole Boardman and
Bob Smith) and two Downtown Association members.
7. The co-managers of the project shall be the City Engineer and CTS Manager of Administration and
Finance.
8. The final ownership and operations issues will be determined after final design and prior to bidding
the project. This will also be the time when all cost estimates are known and total project funding
will be resolved.
JNP:jp
Disk:N:\PROJECTS\93-21~OCAGMnAGMT PM.898
File: GATEWAY PROJECT -
A1tachmenls: Inleriocal Agreement 2 17
Copy: Gary Kenworthy
Tim Smith
Interlocal Agreement
Page 2
Agreements
Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the
parties hereby agree as follows:
1: RESPONSIBILITY .AND AUTHORITY OF THE CITY: CTS hereby designates the City as
the lead agency for the TIS funding of the Project. The City shall have the authority to act
on behalf of CTS provided that. the final decisions regarding planning, site location,
preliminary engineering, cost estimates, environmental assessment, right-of-way acquisition,
final design, and construction are made by consensus of the parties; The Parties agree to
the use and spirit of a collaborative and cooperative decision making process throughout the
project period. Sy so doing, CTS is not waiving any rights it may have as a landowner, an
occupier or an operator of transportation systems affected by the project in the course of
permitting or construction of the Project. The City agrees to consider the needs and desires
of the other parties to this agreement in making decisions with regard to the delegated
responsibilities.
2. RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY OF CTS: The City hereby designates CTS as the
lead agency for the USDOT-FTA funding of the Project CTS shall have the authority to act
on behalf of the City provided that the final decisions regarding planning, site location,
preliminary engineering, cost estimates, environmental assessment, right-ot-way acquisition.
final design, and construction are made by consensus of the parties. The Parties agree to
the use and spirit of a collaborative and cooperative decision making process throughout the
project period. Sy so doing, the City is not waiving any rights it may have as a landowner,
an occupier or an operator of transportation systems affected by the project in the course of
permitting or construction thereof. CTS agrees to consider the needs and desires of the
otner parties to this agreement in making decisions with regard to the delegated
responsibilities.
3. RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY OF THE PADA: The PADA shall appoint two
members to the review committee. In carrying out the duties of the review committee as
defined in Section 9, the Parties agree to the use and spirit of a collaborative and
cooperative decision making process throughout the project period.
4 PROJECT MANAGEMENT: The Parties agree to manage the vanous phases of the Project
to ac::ommodate the procedures consistent with appropriate sections of the "Local Agency
GUidelines" developed by the Washington State Department of Transportation for the
administration of highway improvement projects, and the procedures consistent with the
appropnate sections of the "Project and Construction Management Guidelines 1996 Update"
developed by the USDOT -rT A. If there is a conflict between the two aforementioned
documents the Parties will consult with the two granting agencies to resolve the conflict.
5. PROJECT DESIGN: The design of the Project shall be consistent with current TIS and
USDOT-FTA design standards and the Parties Comprehensive Plans. The Parties shall
formally approve the project at the completion of the pre-engineering, preliminary design,
value engineering, and final design stages.
6. COST-SHARING CONTRIBUTIONS: The parties agree to share all project costs and to
participate in the project costs in accordance with the foilowing estmates:
If.
.
I .
.
.
218
.
.
.
~ ~""'-;', ,,':,....~... _! -,-;'7',"" "
","'., .>'..y,::'.~',:." ~-<;:";:1:_.'h11'''C
Interlocal Agreement
Page 3
,j~1
, ,
~ ;
SOURCES OF FUNDING
Committed:
USDOT-FTA Section 5309
TIB
City of Port Angeles Public Works
Trust Fund
Pending:
USDOT-FTA Section 5309
Total
52,000,000
51,500,000
51,900,000
51.500.000
56,900,000
7. PROJECT COST: The following is the estimated project cost:
Total FTA TIB City of
Port Anaeles
Water main and sidewalk
reconstruction $1,900,000 51,900.000
Engineering and Design $ 750,000 $ 600,000 S 150,000
Right-of-way acquisition 51,000,000 $800,000 S 200,000
Construction $3.250.000 $2.100.000 51.150.000
Total 56,900,000 53,500,000 S1,500,000 $1,900.000
A revised estimated total project cost will be developed upon completion of the design. If
additional funds are needed both parties agree to attempt to obtain more grant funding from
available sources. In no case is either party obligated to provide funds beyond the terms of
this agreement.
8. FORM OF PAYMENT:
e 1 The parties have not agreed to the source of the local match for the grants described in
this agreement. Either party may make a necessary local match in a form that is
acceptable to the granting ~uthority, which forms are assumed to include tn-kind labor
or services, previous construction" or right-ot-way property donation. If possible.
portions of the different grants themselves will be used as matching funds.
8.2 Neither party guarantees, by execution of'this agreement, to make any contribution
towards any required local match. The decision of whether to contribute to the local
match will be made by each of the parties at the time of the requirements for the
pledging of such local match. 'Each party reserves the right to make a decision of
whether to contribute to such local match based upon its abilities, budgets, and best
Interests as determined by the legislative authority of each party.
e.3 The parties agree that contributi,ons to the local match shall be memorialized between
them by amendment to this agreement.
8.4 The parties also agree, whether or not either makes a local match. that each will
facilitate the making, by any party, of a local match sufficientto satisfy the funding and
contractual responsibilities of any grant received for the project. and will execute any
documents necessary to make such local match contribution available to satisfy the
grant conditions.
219
Intertocal Agreement
Page 4
iB
~l
.
"
9. METHOD OF PAYMENT: CTS agrees to manage the project using its accounting system .
and collect the financial data in the format to meet the needs for reporting to both the TIB
and the USDOT-FTA. CTS agrees to provide the City with the necessary financial data for
reponing and billing purposes. CTS agrees to bill the City at least quarterly and provide
information when available as needed.
10. REVIEW COMMITTEE: A committee shall be. appointed to review the. progress of the
Project: advise and make recommendations on design, functions and scope of the Project;
and to hold public meetings to solicit public input and increase public awareness and
understanding of the project. The committee shail be made up of two representatives from
the PADA: two elected officials from the City and one staff person; two elected officials from
CTS and one staff person. The committee shall elect a chairman.
The Project Managers shall be the City Engineer and CTS Manager of Administration and
Finance. and shall serve as co-managers and as ex-officio members of the committee.
~ 1. PROJECT OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE: At the time final design is completed and
9rior to authorization for construction bidding, the parties shall negotiate an operating
agreement which will detail the responsibilities of the parties in operating the facility,
malntalnmg the facility, leasing the facility, collecting and accounting for funds. ownership of
the facility. and architectural con~rol of the facility.
~2. INDEMNIFICATION:
A. The City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless CTS and its appointed and .
e!ectea officers and employees from and against any and all liability. loss. cost.
::a:nage. and expenses, inCluding costs ana attorney's fees in aefense thereof. because
of actions, claims or lawsuits for damages because of personal or bodily injury,
:~~:ud:ng death at any time resulting therefrom, sustained or alleged to nave been
s~stalned by any person or persons. and on account of damage to property. Including
l~SS of use thereof. asserted or arising or alleged to have arisen directly or malrectly out
:~ or In consequence of the City or its employees' perfonnance of this Agreement or the
r:egllgence orwi!lful acts of the City or its employe~s. .
_ S7S agrees to 'defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and 'its appOinted and
e!ectea officers and employees from and against any and all liabiiity, loss. cost.
aamage. and expenses, including costs and attorney fees in defense thereof. because
c~ 3ct:ons, clairr.s or lawsuits for damages because of persona! or bodily injury,
Incluamg death at any time resulting therefrom, sustained or alleged to have been
sustaIned by any person or persons, and on account of damage to property, including
loss of use thereof. asserted or arising or alleged to have arisen directly or indirectly out
cf or In consequence of CTS or its employees' performance of this Agreement or the
negligence or willfui acts of CTS or its employees.
13 DURATION OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement, unless otherwise amended, shall remain
In effect until the completion of the Project. which shall be final acceptance of construction.
piUS the settlement of all claims by the City and CTS.
~ ~ AMENDMENTS OR MODIFICATIONS: No amend~ent to thiS Agreement shall be .
effective unless approved and executed by the Parties in writing.
220
.
.
.
-~? j,''''''',:,3'\l;''i~'' """-r:"'4.:fF ",,,,'t';t:, ,;,c::C;:'~~r :t.l'j*&..t-'~;,~
Interlocal Agreement
'.'....~'.......
-Vi'"~, _
",1".,.'
Page 5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement in triplicate by, the
subjoined signatures of their duly authorized officials.
CLALLAM TRANSIT SYSTEM
By:
PORT ANGELES DOWNTOWN
ASSOCIATION
By:
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
By:
221
22~
.
I .
.
.
.
.
.
,.'
r
City Attorney's
Office
Memorandum
Craig D. Knutson
City AUomcy
Dennis C. Dickson
Sr. Assistant City AUorncy
Candace Kreider
Lcga1 Assistant
Chrystina Bruneau
Administrative Assistant
(j f1J/1 G
,..,~.
"'9
July 16, 1998
TO:
City Council
FROM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
Re:
Amendment to Industrial Water Supply Contract with Daishowa
and Rayonier
SUMMARY/RECOMMENDA TION: The City, Rayonier and Daishowa America have
negotiated the termmation of Rayonier's obligations under the industrial water supply
contract based' on the City taking over maintenance of the entire waterline, Daishowa
reimbursing the City's'Costs for maintaining the part of the pipeline that Daishowa uses, and
Rayonier paying the City $200,000. It is recommended !bat the City Coundlauthorize
tbe Mayor to sign tbe attacbed First Amendment to Water Supply Contract
Jeanie OcFrans
Administrative Assistant. ISSUE: Should the City Council approve the attached amendment to the industrial water
supply contract with Rayonier and Daishowa America?
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: One of the issues to be resolved with the closing of the
Rayonier Mill is how to deal with Rayonier's contractual rights and obligations under the
industrial water supply contract(copy a~ched). During negotiations on this issue, the City
~d Rayonier agreed.that Rayonier~ould pay.,the City $200,000 to release Rayonier from
all of its obligations under the water supply contract.
Rayonier's financial obligatio~.under the contract was to pay the City $34,500 a year for the
water that it used (not to exceed 45 million gallons per day). This obligation began in
January, 1990 and was to continue for the 30 year duration of the contract. Since the water
supply contract. did not have a termination pr~vision and it waS legally uncertain as to how
much, if anything, Rayonier would owe the City when it ceased using the water, the parties
have determined that $200,000 is a reasonable amount.
With regard to Rayonier's maintenance obligation, the City and Daishowa America have
agreed that the City will maintain the pipeline ~d Daishowa will reimburse the
223
July 16. 1998
, Page 2
.'
,.
City for all costs of pipeline maintenance services from the Daishowa Mill to the Elwha River diversion
point. If the City were to use the pipeline to serve other customers in the future, then Daishowa's
reimbursement responsibility would be reduced on a pro rata basis. .The Public Works Department
estimates that the non-reimbursed cost of maintaining the waterline east of Daishowa to the Rayonier site
could be approximately $5,000 to $10,000 per year, assuming no major breaks were to occur.
~< f(] ~
Craig D. Knbtson
City Attorney
CDK:jd
Attachments
~
224
..:,.
. :'""'. .
..~
,-r
",~
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
"', .'~
.
':\f'
0" 0
,::c"';,, "
'1..
~
~
..
FIRST AMENDMENT OF W A ftR SUPPLY CONTRACf
This First Amendment of Water Supply Contract ("First Amendment") is dated effective
the 1st day of January, 1998, by and between Rayonierlnc., a North Carolina corporation
(hereinafter "Rayonier"), the City of Port. Angeles, a municipal corporation of the State of
Washington (hereinafter "City") and Daishowa America Co., Ltd., a Washington corporation
(hereinafter "Daishowa").
BelT 04.1..4;
A. Rayonier, the City, and Daishowa.entered into a Water Supply Contract executed
December S, 1989 ("the Water Supply Contract"), wherein the City agreed to sell to Rayonier
and Daishowa, and Rayonier and Daishowa agreed to purchase from the City, untreated water
from the Elwha River for use in Rayonier's and Daishowa's respective mills located in Port
Angeles.
B. Rayonier has ceased its mill operations in Port Angeles and desires to terminate
its obligations under the Water Supply contract, and the City and Daishowa are willing to release
Rayonier of its obligations thereunder. '
AGREEMENTS
The parties hen:to mutually agree u follows:
1. Upon execution of this Firat Amendment by all parties hereto, Rayonier shall pay
the sum of $200,000.00 to ~ City in consideration of the release of Rayonier from aU its
obligations under the Water Supply Contract.
2. . AU of Rayonier' a ~ligations and rights under the Water Supply Contract ahall
terminltte effective u of the date flJ'St writteD above, except that ,Rayonier shall be eiltitled to
continue to utilize water for ita (tee suppression system at its 'mill aite in !tort Angeles until such
time u DaiJbowa installs . surge towel' (over~pf'elSU(e protection device) on the Pipeline (as
such tetm is defmed in the Water Supply Co~) downstream of the point at which Daishowa
takes water from the Pipeline. JiB of the effeCtive date of this Fint Amendment, the City shall
usume Rayonier's obligations under Section'" of the Water Supply Contract, subject to the
City'. right to receive from Daishowa reimbuncment for all costa for pipeline maintenance
I
services from the Daisbowa Mill upstream to the point of diversion, provided that in the event
the City uses the Pipeline to serve other customers, the costs shall be shared between Daisbowa
and such other customers on a pro rata basis according to water entidement
3. Rayonier hereby grants the City a license for access over and across Rayonier'l
property to the extent reasonably necessary for the City to ex<<cisc its maintenance
-1-
225
..
.
.
"
responsibilities llIlda' Section 7 of the Water Supply Contract.
4. The City and Daisbowa hereby release Rayonier, and Rayonier hereby releases
the City and Daishowa, of all obligations, claims or liabilities for perfonnance under the Water
Supply Contract as of the date tint written above, provided, however, that nothing contained
herein shall release the City from its obligations to Daishowa under the Water Supply Contract,
nor shall anything contBined herein, unless otherwise provided, release Daishowa from its
obligations'to the City under the Watel' Supply Contract. .
S. Except as otherWise provided in this First Amendment, the City's and Daishowa's
obligations and rights shall remain as set forth intbe Water Supply Contract until it expires or is
terminated.
6. The laws of the State of Washington shall govern this First Amendment
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement by the undersigned,
duly authorized representatives.
RA YONIER, INC.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
By:
By:
Its:
Dated:
Its:
Dated:
DAISHOW A AMEllICA CO., LTD.
By:
Its:
Dated:
A...TIIA 11lILCON
-z-
22~
....
'~~~
1
.
.
.
::;~~~!~~:2fT: '~"irr"r.:E :'~,:~~'.
',,,:,,.,"~.,,,., '
-'~: '~"><;'::\'\c
()Y1LL-.~D
...,.
~-:"'.,.
\~"<'
.#
.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
Brad Collins. Director. Extension 475 J; Sue Roberds. Extension n50; David Sawyer. Extension n52
DATE:
August 4 ~ 1998
TO:
Mayor Braun, City Councilmembers, and City Manager Ibarra
FROM:
Brad Collins, Planning Director
RE:
City Representatives for WRIA 18 Lead Agency
.
SummaryIRecommended Action: The five initiating governments met for the first time on July 23,
1998, to organize the work for Water Resources Inventory Area 18, which was funded for Phases
1 and part of2 by the Department of Ecology. It was agreed that the lead agency for purposes of
the grant administration would be an elected official and staff person from each of the five initiating
governments (Clallam County, Lower Elwha Tribe, Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe, Agnew Irrigation
District, and City of Port Angeles). The Lead Agency will schedule activities and assign WRIA 18
responsibilities. The City Administration recommends that the City Council appoint a City Council
member to be the City's elected representative and Brad Collins to be the City's staff representative
for the WRIA 18 Lead Agency.
Background! Analysis:
. Due to. the proposed listing ofPuget Sound Chinook Salmon, which inlcude the Elwha River Salmon
in this evolutionary species unit, the City worked with the other four initiating governments to make
a proposal for WRIA funds. DOE granted WRIA 18 $50,000 for Phase 1 organization and .$150,000
for Phase 2 water quantity assessment. The proposal divides WRIA 18 into two Planning Teams:
one for the Dungeness Watershed and one for the Elwha Watershed. Smaller watersheds inbetween
the Dungeness and the Elwha would be iQcluded under one or the other Planning Teams. The Elwha
Planning Team will be led by the City of Port Angeles and the Lower Elwha Tribe.
City Attorney Knutson, Public Works Director Pittis, and Planning Director Collins have been
attending a number of meetings addressing these issues and will be available to answer questions at
the City Council meeting.
~
. B d Collins, Planning Director
227
228
.
( .
.
.
~
~
.~=~
and building
a better
community-
Jack PIttIs
Director {4801J
Phytlls Rasler
Administrative .
Assistant {4800J
Cafe Rinehart
Administrative
Assistant {4700J
Bob Titus
Deputy Director {4701J
Ken Ridout
Deputy Director (4802J
Gary Kenworthy
City Engineer (4803J
Jim Hsrper
E/8Ctrlca1 Engineer
{4702J
Tim Smith
COntr8ct & Project
arwnlstrstor (4804J
~ Haehnlen
Sr. Bu//cjng Inspedor
(4816)
Tom Sperllne
Sr. EIect1tcaIInspedor
(4735)
ScoIl McLaIn
Power M4II8f18' (4703)
R81ph EItswotftI
Wa/8f, WtJ8tewtJ/8f
Collection
Supet1ntend8nt [4f55)
PeI9 8utnJft
EquIp ServbM
Superlntend8nt (4f35)
Marie ShtJmp
Light Openttlons
MaMgfN (4731)
KfWln CurtJs
Tl'9tJt Plant
Sup&rVlsor (4845J
Tom McCabe
SW CoIlectJon
SUpervisor {4876J
Sfel"9 Evans
Landi/II SUpeMsor
.73J
w WIJcox
Street Maintenance
SUpeMsor (4825)
,J, {)~U c
MEMORANDUM
'.
:_-1' i
DATE:
July 30,1998
TO:
FROM:
City Manager Ibarra, Mayor Brau
Public Works Department
SUBJECT:
Authorization to sign granJ
Housing Rehabilitation prog
contract for Phase IV of the Port Angeles
SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATION: We have rec;eived the standard DCTED Block Grant contract
relating to the' implementation of the grant award of $750,000 for our Port Angel~s Housing
Rehabilitation Program Phase IV. The rehabilitation work targets health and safety repairs for low-to-
moderate income homeowners, along with addressing the potential blight of residential neighborhoods.
Approximately 130 homes have been rehabilitated to-date. The program is noted for providing family
wage jobs within our community by helping support dozens of local building contractor businesses and
the employees they hire, along with supporting local businesses by utilizing residential building supplies
purchased from our local building material suppliers. Of particular note among the City's Phase IV
projects will be an expansion into rehabilitation of multi-family housing, through our expected participation
in the Clallam Housing Authority Lee Hotel renovation project. The Public Works Department
recommends Council authorize the Mavor to sign the contract with DCTED.
ISSUE: Shall the City enter into a contract with the State Department of Community, Trade and
Economic Development (DCTED), regarding a $750,000 grant implementing Phase IV of the Port
Angeles Housing Rehabilitation Program?
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: We have received the standard DCTED Block Grant contract relating to
the implementation of the Cily's Block Grant award for our Housing Rehabilitation Program. This award
will fund the fourth round of housing rehabilitation. The first three phases of the Program have now
completed well over $1.5 million in housing repairs to approximately 130 homes within the City limits,
providing direct benefits to around 200 city residents. These home repairs have provided through zero-
interest, deferred loans, (and in a few cases grants for emergency or handicapped access purposes)
to low-to-moderate income households. The rehabilitation work primarily targets health and safety
issues within the homes, along with addressing potential blight of our residential neighborhoods. The
program is into it's fourth year of implementation through a sub-recipient contract with Clallam~efferson
Community Action, and is noted for providing family wage jobs within our community by helping support
dozens of local building contractor businesses and the employees they hire, along with supporting local
businesses by utilizing residential building supplies purchased from our local building materiai suppliers.
Phase IV of the program, has been awarded $750,000, which brings the total program awards to
$2,500,000. Most of these funds will eyentually return to the City where they can be re-directed into
Mure housing and community development projects for the citizens of Port Angeles. It should also be
noted, that because of the success of the Port Angeles effort, the City of Forks and most recently
Clallam County, have also been awarded similar grants to extend the program beyond our City Umits.
Both the Forks and Clallam County programs are modeled after the City's and are expected to utilize
and share the cost of the administrative capacity which the City and Clallam/Jefferson Community Action
have developed.
Of particular note among the City's Phase IV projects will be an expansion into rehabilitation of low to
moderate multi-family housing, with the expected participation In assisting the Clallam Housing Authority
Lee Hotel renovation .
The Public Works Department recommends Council authorize the Mayor to sign the contract and related
documents with the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development, accepting $750,000
in Block Grant funds for the Implementation of Phase IV of the Port Angeles Housing Rehabilitation
Project.
TIMOTHY J. SMITH
Contracts / Projects Administrator
229
230
.
.
.
.
..
.
XVI - A,
.".
. ~';:';
""," "
'S! .i
.
PLANNING, DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
Brad Collins, Director, Extension 4751.' Sue Roberds, Extension 4750; David Sawyer, Extension 4752
July 31, 1998
{ .
TO:
Mayor Braun, City Council members, and Manager Ibarra
FROM:
Planning Department, Brad Collins, Planning Director
SUBJ:
STREET V ACA TION PETITION - STY 98-02
OLYMPIC MEMORIAL HOSPITAL - Portion of the Georgiana/Caroline alley
immediately west of Chambers Street
RECOMMENDA TION/ ACTION:
Following discussion, the Council should adopt the attached ordinance which contains the
compensation amount set by Council's Real Estate Committee for the right-of-way.
BACKGROUND/SUMMARY..:
Following the City Council's July 21, 1998, public hearing, Council approved the vacation of right-
of-way as proposed which is described as the eastern portion of the Georgiana/Caroline alley
immediately west of Chambers Street. As the Council's Real Estate Committee had not set the
compensation amount for the right-of-way, the City Council continued formal adoption of the
ordinance untilthe August 4 meeting. The Real Estate Committee met in the mean~ime, ,and that
figure is included in the attached ordinance: Staff will be available for questions.
~
Attachments: Ordinance
Findings and Conclusions
c:\wp\daily\memo.cc2
231
232'
.
I .
.
.
""'
k
.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles
vacating a portion of the alley be~een Georgiana
and Caroline Streets in Hart and Cookes Subdivision
of Suburban Block 31 of the Townsite of Port Angeles.
WHEREAS, a petition is on file with the City of Port Angeles to vacate a portion
of the alley between Georgiana and Caroline Streets in Hart and Cookes Subdivision of
Suburban Block 31 ofthe Townsite of Port Angeles; and
WHEREAS, the petition was signed by the owners of more than two-thirds of
the property abutting upon the right-of-way sought to be vacated; and
WHEREAS, stre.et vacations are categorically exempt from the requirements of
the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) as set forth in WAC 197-11-800(2)(h); and
.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 7-98, a public hearing has been held before
the City Council following public notice as required by Chapter 35.79 RCW; and
WHEREAS, the street vacation appearsto be of benefit to and in the interest of
the public;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF PORT
ANGELES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as fpllows:
Sectio~~cation.. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, the
following described right-of-way is hereby vacated:
That portion of the alley between Georgiana and Caroline Streets
abutting Lots 1 and2, the east one half of Lot 3, and Lots 16, 17, and 18
of Hart and Cookes SubdivisionofSuburban Block 31 of the Townsite
of Port Angeles.
Section 2 - Conditions
.
1.
The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the
City's Public Works Department{Attachment B of the June 24, 1998 "
1
233
Plaiming Department Staff Report for STV 98-02) which include
construction of the alley and street entrance to city standards including
drainage, closure of the vacated alley entrance, ,encasement of the sewer
line in the vacated alley, and an ingress/egress easement rather than a
dedication of the redirected portion of the alley to serve as access south
to Georgiana Street: The underground .utility easement shall remain.
.
2. The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the
City's Fire Department (included in Attachment C of the June 24, 1998
Planning Department Staff Report for STV 98-02) which require that the
re-routed portion of,the alley shall be provided 'with an all weather
surface meeting. the. City's specifications and that a fire hydrant is
provi4ed at the intersection of Georgiana and Chambers Streets.
3. The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the
City's Police Department (included in its letter dated July 7, 1998,
presented to the Planning Commission July 8, 1998), which requires that
the north driveway exit area be sufficient in size/to allow a full size
police vehicle to make a right turn to continue westbound down the
alley, that arrow signs and a light at the corner showing the alley makes
a turn south onto Georgiana Street when travelling east down the alley,
and that street lighting be provided in the alley west ofthe building.
4.
The street vacation shall not be finaled until abuilding permit is issued
for the property consistent with the revised site development plan
(attached as Attachment A to the July 8, 1998 Planning Department Staff
Report for STY 98-02).
.
5. Final occupancy of any structures on the site shall not be allowed until
the street vacation is complete and all of the individual lots comprising
the development site have been combined into one legai building and
zoning lot.
6. Any costs associated )v.ith utility relocation and alley realignment shall
be borne by the applicant.
SectionJ..::_Compensation. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.030 compensation
for the right-of-way is hereby set at $ 9.315jllL
Section 4 .:. QJlit.Claim Deed. Upon satisfaction of the compensation amount in
Section 2 of this Ordinance, the owners of abutting property entitled to the vacated street,
pursuant to RCW 35.79.040, may present a quit claim deed to the City of Port Angeles for
execution by the Mayor, who is hereby authorized and directed to execute such quit claim deed. .
Such quit claim ~eed shall include all reservations, conditions, or other qualifications upon the
2
234
''';l/~l~i"'~'''';::1'l,'!'''i;-~:;'~,f.,~,~. -~~':'[i'.'~~M~j,~~;:':~dfr~
title established by this Ordinance.
.
Section 5 This Ordinance shall be effective only upon the satisfaction of the
terms and conditions of this Ordinance and shall be published upon that satisfaction. The City
Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy with the Clallam County Auditor and Clallam County
Assessor.
PASSED by the City Council of the CitY of Port Angeles at a regular meeting
of said Council held on theAtlL day of August, 1998.
Gary Braun, Mayor
ATTEST:
Becky Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
.
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary
hospltal.stv
.
3
235
.
"
"1.
9t6
.
.
.
.
~~..
.L~.,..;.-.>
.
.
.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF STREET VACATION PETITION
STY 98-02, Olympic Memorial Hospital:
Conditions:
1. The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Public Works
Department (Attachment B of the June 24, 1998 Plamring Department Staff Report for STY
98-02) which include construction of the alley and street entrance to city standards including
drainage, closure of the vacated alley entrance, encasement of the sewer line in the vacated .
alley, an ingress/egress easement to serve as access south to Georgiana Street (relocated ('
alley. The underground utility easement shall remain.
2. The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Fire
Department (included in Attachment C of the June 24, 1998 Planning Department Staff
Report for STY 98-02) which require that the re-routed portion of the alley shall be provided
with an all weather surface meeting the City's specifications and that a fire hydrant is
provided at the intersection of Georgiana and Chambers Streets.
3.
The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Police
Department included in their letter dated July 7, 1998, presented to the Planning
Commission July 8, 1998, which recommends that the west parking lot exit area be sufficient
in size to allow a full size police vehicle to make a right turn to continue westbound down
the alley, that arrow signs and a light at the comer showing the alley makes a turn south onto
Georgiana Street when travelling east down the alley, and that street lighting be provided in
the alley west of the building.
4. The street vacation shall not be finaled until a building permit is issued for the property
consistent with the revised site development plan (attached as Attachment A to the July 8,
1998 Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-02).
5. Final occupancy of any structures on the site shaH not be aHowed until the street vacation' is
complete and all of the individual lots comprising the development site have been combined
into one legal building and zoning lot.
6. Any costs associated with utility relocation and aHey realignment shaH be borne by the
applicant.
Findings:
I. The applicant for the requested vacation is Olympic Memorial Hospital. The
application/petition is attached as Attachment A of the June 24, 1998 Planning Department
Staff Report for STY 98-02.
2.
The applicant revised the original site plan to address the concerns of the Police Department.
The revised site plan is attached as Attachment A ofthe July 8, 1998 Planning Department
Staff Report for STY 98-02.
3. The requested vacation is for that portion of the alley between Caroline Street and Georgiana
Street ilbutting Lots 1, 2, 16, 17, 18, and the east one-half of Lot 3 of Hart and Cookes
237
Subdivision of Suburban Block No. 31 in the Townsite of Port Angeles.
4.
The street vacation is categorically exempt from threshold determination and Environmental
Impact Statement requirements per Section 197-11-800(2)(h). of the Washington
Administrative Code.
5. The subject right-of-way and adjoining properties are currently designated on the City's
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as Commercial and zoned Commercial Office.
6. Multiple utilities including sewer and electrical lines are located in the subject right-of-way.
7.
The subject right-of-way is currently improved.
8. The Public Works, Fire, and .Police Department's original comments are included as
Attachments B, C, and D of the June 24, 1998, Planning Department Staff Report for STY
98-02. '
9. As noted in their letter presented to the Planning Commission on July 8, 1998, the Police
Department's concerns, expressed in their letter dated May 19, 1998, have been adequately
mitigated to their satisfaction.
Conclusions:
A.
The Comprehensive Plan's Utilities and Public Services Policies C2 & 3 and Transportation
Policy B 18 as listed in the June 24, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-02
directly relate to the proposed vacation.
B. As conditioned, the proposed vacation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Utilities
and Public Services Policies C2 & 3 and Transportation Policy B 18.
C. As conditioned, the proposed vacation will result in improved public health facilities in the
community.
D. As conditioned, the proposed vacation will benefit the public health, safety and welfare.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of August 4, 1998.
Gary Braun, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
.
I .
.
.
238
.
.
.
'.,.~ii:.".;': ,-.-J
1
Y VI - b
.
'J.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
Brad Collins, Director. Extension 4751: Sue Roberds, Extension 4750; David Sawyer, Extension 4752
. July 31, 1998
TO:
Mayor Braun, City Council members, and Interim Manager Pittis
FROM:
Planning Department, Brad Collins, Planning Director
SUBJ:
STREET VACATION PETITION - STY 98-03
HERMANN - Portion of the 2/3 alley in Block 49
RECOMMENDATION/ACTION:
Council should move to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve
the right-of-way vacation as proposed subject to compensation being set by the Council's Real
Estate Committee. The Commission 's findings and conclusions should be cited in support of the
action.
BACKGROUND/SliMMARY~
On July 28, 1998, the Planning Commission conducted a special public hearing for consideration
of a petition for vacation of City right-of-way described as being a portion of the 2/3 a,Hey between
Tumwater and Cedar Streets. The Planning Commission moved to unanimously recommend the
City Council vacate the right-of-way as proposed. The staffs report is attached for your information
along with an excerpt of the special meeting minutl(s. Staffwill be available for questions.
~-'
Sue Roberds, PI
Attachments: Ordinance
Findings and Conclusions
Minutes
Staff Report
239
.' .
240
.
.
.
.
.
.
"~
-,
1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles
vacating a portionofthe 2/3 alley south of
Marine Drive in Block 49, Townsite of Port Angeles.
WHEREAS, a petition is on file with th~ City of Port Angeles to vacate a portion
- of the 2/3 alley between Marine Drive and Third Street in Block 49 of the Townsite of Port
Angeles; and
WHEREAS, the petition was signed by the owners of more than two-thirds of the
property abutting upon the right-of-way sought to be vacated; and
WHEREAS, since the subject area includes an environmentally sensitive area, the
requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (Chapter 43.21 C RCW) have been met by
the filing of an Adoption ofan Existing Document on June 10, 1997; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 7-98, a public hearing has been held before
the City Council following public notice as required by Chapter 35.79 RCW; and
WHEREAS, the street vacation appears to be of benefit to and in the interest of
the public;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POltT
ANGELES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Sectionl~acation. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, the
following described right-of-way is hereby vacated:
That portion of the 2/3 alley between Marine Drive and Third Street
abutting Lots 1- 8 and 13 - 20 Block 49, Townsite of Port Angeles.
Section 2 - Conditions
1.
A 20 foot by 80 foot long utility easement shall be provided for the
existing powerline. The owner must maintain vehicle access to the
powerline.
241
1
2.
The street vacation is subject to the conditions of approval required by the
City Planning Department's Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA)
approval No. ESA 97-01, which requires:
.
A. Compliance with recommendations contained in the engineering
report dated January 24, 1997, prepared by Polaris Engineering and
Surveying, Inc. .
B. Land clearing, grading, or filling shall be limited to the period
between April 1 and Octo~er 1..
C. Vegetation on steep slopes shall be preserved or replaced.
D. Any development of the property shall meet City standards for
stormwater runoff improvements.
Section 3 - Compensation:. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.030 compensation for the
right-of-way is hereby set at $
Section 4 - Quit Claim Deed. Upon satisfaction of the compensation amount in
Section 2 of this Ordinance, the owners of abutting property entitled to the vacated street,
pursuant to RCW 35.79.040, may present a quit claim deed to the City of Port Angeles for .
execution by the Mayor, who is hereby authorized and directed to execute such quit claim deed.
Such quit claim deed shall include all reservations, conditions, or other qualifications upon the
title established by this Ordinance.
-Se.cti0IL5~This Ordinance shall be effective only upon the satisfaction of the
."
terms and conditions of this Ordinance and shall be published upon that satisfaction. The City
Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy with the Clallam County Auditor and Clallam County
Assessor.
.
242
2
.
PASSED by' the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of
said Council held on the_ day of August, 1998.
Gary Braun, Mayor
ATTEST:
( .
Becky Upton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
By Summary
.
. .,....11 Hf."'A'. .,,,
.
243
3
244
't'
"
'.;~
.
{ .
.
.
.
.
.
_.
. .
; "" 'i; '; i,V':;;.~~,~ '_i~,:)":>;~:';;,;'<
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF STREET VACATION PETITION
STY 98-0.1 - HERMANN:
Findings:
I. The applicant for the requested vacation is William Hermahn, the application/petition
is attached as Attachment A of the July 22, 1998, Planning Depanment Staff Repon
for STY 98-03.
2. The requested vacation is for that ponion of the alley between Marine Drive and
Third Street abutting Lots 1-8 and 13-20, Block 49 in the Townsite of Pon Angeles
identified in Attachment A of the July 22, 1998, Planning Depanment Staff Repon
for STY 98-03.
3. The City's SEPA Responsible Official issued an Adoption of Existing Environmental
Document on June 10, 1997, for the proposed vacation which is included in
Attachment B of the July 22, 1998, Planning Department StaffRepol1 for STV 98-03
4. An Environmentally Sensitive Areas Approval (ESA 97-0 I) was approved for the
proposal on March 7,1997, which is included in Attachment B of the July 22, 1998.
Planning Depal1ment Staff Repon for STY 98-03.
5.
The subject right-of-way and adjoining propel1ies are currently designated on the
City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as Industrial (I) and Open Space (OS) and
are zoned Industrial, Light (IL) and Public Buildings and Parks (PBP). The pOl1ion
of the propel1ies that contain the marine bluff is the area zoned PBP while the
majority of the properties, which is the area to the nOl1h of the marine bluff are zoned
IL.
6 An electrical transmission line is located in the subject right-of-way.
7. The Public Works, Fire and Police Depal1ment's comments are included as
Attachments C, D, and E of the July 22"'1998 Planning Department StaffRepol1 for
STY 98-03
Conclusions
A. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies D3, H I and 4 as listed in the July 2~.
1998, Planning Department Staff Repon for STV 98-03 directly relate to the
proposed vacation.
B. As prescntly improved, public use of the alley is extremely limited.
c.
As conditioned, the proposed vacation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan"s
Land Use Policies D1, H I and 4
D. As conditioned, thc proposed vacation will allow improved use of the adjaccnt
commercial site with improved site design
245
246
f
.
.
..
.
.
.
E.
.-':'F";:,.,,,:..,.'.t:'t:..:>
-~.
"~l
~
As conditioned, the proposed vacation will not have an adverse impact on the public
health, safety and welfare.
Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of August 4, 1998.
. .
Gary Braun, Mayor
Becky J. Upton, City Clerk
.'"
247
FleE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
.
FJlOM: .
David Sawyer, Senior Planner
TO:
( .
DATE:
July 22, 1998
.-
RE: STV 98-03
APPLICANT: William Hennann
REQUEST: Vacation of a portion of the alley between Marine Drive and Third Street
abutting Lots 1-8 and 13-20, Block 49 in the Townsite of Port Angeles.
BACKGROUND: .
The application is for the vacation of a portion of the alley between Marine Drive and Third Street
abutting Lots 1-8 and 13-20, ~lock 49 in the Townsite of Port Angeles(please see Attachment A).
DISCUSSION:
Environmental Review:
Although the vacation of a street is nonnally categori~ly .exempt from threshold determination and
.-
Environmental Impact Statement requirements sinCe the subject area includes an environmentally
sensitive area (marine bluft), this application is subject to SEPA review. Consequently, the SEPA
Responsible Official issued an Adoption ofExisting Environmental Document on June 10, 1997. An
Environmentally Sensitive Areas Approval (ESA 97-01) was approved for the proposal on March
7. 1997. Please see Attachment B.
Department Reviews and Comments:
Public Works Department:
The Public Works Department's comments point out the presence of overhead utility lines in
the area of the proposed vacation and request a 20' utility easement where the lines are .
located (see Attachment C).
248
City of PorI Angeles Planning Departmm/. 321 E. 5th St.. PorI Angeks. WA. (voice) 360-417-4750. (fax) 360-417-4609
"-o.;';,"':"'-',Y'_"'';''O,,:,"'';:..~d,'
"I",',"
".~
V\",/:, '
.......
.0'",,--:'
"-,;:~
3
....!s- 13
..., ,.
. : StafrReport
STY 98-03. (William Hermann)
July 22. 1998
Pap 2
.
Fire Department:
The Fire Department has no objections to the proposed vacation (see Attachment D).
Police Department:
The Police Departrilent's COmments,state the vacation Will not impact service in this area (see
, Attachment E). '
I .
Planning Department:
Below is a summary of potential impacts from the proposal:
Traffic panems: The Public Works Department has not indicated any negative impact on the area's
vehicular traffic pattern. As presently improved, public use of the alley is extremely limited.
,
Utilities: The Public Works Department has indicated an electrical transmission line is located in the
area of the proposed vacation and that an easement will be necessary if the vacation is approved.
Public Health. Safety and Welfare: There is no evidence, the proposed vacation would result in a
. threat to the public health, safety or welfare.
Development Panems: The proposed vacation is located in an area of currently developed industrial
and commercial lots which would not be affected by the proposed vacation.
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance:
The subject right-of-way and adjoining properties are currently designated on the City's
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as Industrial (I) and Open Space (OS) and are zoned Industrial,
Light ell..) and Public Buildings and Parks (PBP). The portion of the properties that contain the
marine bluffis the area zoned PBP while the majority of.the properties, which is the area to the north
of the marine bluff are zoned ll...
The following Comprehensive Plan policies have been found to be most relevant to the proposal:.
Land Use Element Policy Dl - '/he City should encourage new and existing commercial
developments and businesses which are consistent with the goals and policies of this
Comprehensive Plan.
.
The area of the proposed vacation bisects the applicant's current equipment and storage yard.
The vacation of this area will allow a better utilization of the applicant's property for
equipment and materials storage thus enhancing this commercial building material and
supplies store use.
Ltuul Use Element Policy HI - Urban services shall be available for all industrial areas as
249
City of PorI Angeles Planning lHpartmenl. 321 E. 5th St. Port Angeks. WA, (voice) 360-417-4750. (fax) 360-417-4609
P1anniDs Depertment StafrReport
STV 98-03, (William Hermann)
July 22, 1998
Page 3
required by the Capital Facilities Element concurrency policy.
The utility easement requested by the Public Works Department will insure continued
adequate provision of electrical service in the area. . Other urban services will be unaffected
by the proposed vacation.
Land Use Element Policy H4 - Industrial activity'should be located in two major areas: .
. adjacent to the harbor and around the airport.
This area is located in the vicinitY of the Port Angeles Harbor.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of
approval to the City Council for street vacation request STV 98-03 subject to the following
conditions of approval and based on the following findings and conclusions:
Condition of Approval:
1.
The proposed street vacation is subject to the recommendations of the City's Public
Works Department included in Attachment C of the July 22, 1998 Planning
Department Staff Report for STV 98-03.
2. The proposed street vacation is subject to the conditions of approval required by ESA
97-01 included in Attachment B of the July 22, 1998 Planning Department Staff
Report for STV 98-03.
Finding~:
1. The applicant for the requested vacation is William Hermann. the application/petition
is attached as Attachment A of the JuIy"22, 1998, Planning Department Staff Report
for STV 98-03.
2. The requested vacation is for that portion of the alley between Marine Drive and
Third Street abutting Lots 1-8 and 13-20, Block 49 in the Townsite of Port Angeles
identified in Attachment A of the July 22, 1998, Planning Department Staff Report
for STV 98-03.
3" The City's SEP A Responsible Official issued an Adoption of Existing Environmental
Document on June 10, 1997, for the proposed vacation which is included in
Attachment B of the July 22, 1998, Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-03.
4.
An Environmentally Sensitive Areas Approval (ESA 97-01) was approved for the
proposal on March 7, 1997, which is included in Attachment B of the July 22, 1998,
Planning Department Staff Report for STV 98-03.
City of Port Angeles Planning Department. 321 E. 5th SL, Port Angeles, WA. (voice) 360-417-4750, (fax) 360-417-4609
.
( .
.
.
250.
.
.
.
'"'--~"~'-"';' ':;'i'~:"'" ,~~~O"r "'-, - .", j~'n,-;;.;t:" '.'i'(~
~..
...'t~tr.m
. ':.,:.:.:.:~
P1aJmiDg Deputment StafrReport
STV 98-03, (William Hermann)
July 22, 1998
Page 4
5. The subject right-of-way and ~joining properties are currently designated on the
City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as Industrial (I) and Open Space (OS) and
are zoned Industrial, Light (ll..) and Public Buildings and Parks (PBP). The portion
of the propertieS that contain the marine bluff is the area zoned PBP while the
majority of the properties. which is the area to the north of the marine bluff are zoned
n...
6.
An electrical transmission line is located in the subject right-of-way:
I .
7. The Public Works, Fire and Police Department's comments are included as
Attachments C, D, and E of the July 22, 1998 Planning Department Staff Report for
STY 98-03.
Conclusions
A. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies D3, HI and 4 as listed in the July 22,
1998, Planning Department Staff Report for STY 98-03 directly relate to the
proposed vacation.
B.
As presently improved, public use of the alley is extremely limited.
c.
As conditioned, the proposed vacation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's
Land Use Policies D3, HI and 4.
D. As conditioned, the proposed vacation will allow improved use of the adjacent
commercial site with improved site design.
E As conditioned, the proposed vacation will not have an adverse impact on the public
health, safety and welfare.
....
ST"9tOJ.PCI
251
City of Port Angeles Planning Department. 32 J E. 5th St.. Port Angeles. WA. (voice) 360-417-4750. (fax) 360-417-4609
...
r-
Civil · Structural .. Management
1401 West 7th Strut
. Port A",tlts, Washingt01l 98363
Office & FDX (360) 452.2098
15 June, 1998
'. City of Port Angeles
321 E. Fifth Street.
Port Angeles, WA. 98362
,
. .
'. : ~
Subject: Vacation of alley behind Sunset Wire Rope
Dear Mr. Sir;
Attached is an application for the vacation of the alley to the South of the new
Sunset Wire Rope Facility in Port Angeles. The vacation is requested for the
alley abutting lots 1-8 and 13-20 of Block 49 TPA. Of these 16 lots, only 3 are
owned by other than Sunset Wire Rope or its owners. Thus the applicant owns
81.25% of the adjoining property.
I feel it is necessary for the City of Port Angeles to. recognize several
conditions as this vacation is processed. All of this alley is directly below the bluff .
to the south. This fact was the significant detennining factor in allowing a
variance from the setback requirements on these lots. The area on these lots
which can have a building placed on them is significantly reduced due to the
existence of the bluff. The alley which is in this request for vacation is within the
impact zone of any bluff movement. Thus the city is actually reducing its liability
.exposure by the vacation of this alley. An example of this liability was shown as a
result of the slide behind Lamonts, which covered a portion of the alley there.
This alley is also only usable for vehicle movement in and through the rear
area of the Sunset business operation. This -vehicle movement maintains
whether the alley is vacated or not. Sunset does not gain additional storage area
as a result of this vacation, it gains the ability to secure the outside storage area
to the south of their building. .
The west end of this vacation will allow the construction of an one hundred
foot long storage facility on lot 8, rather than an eighty foot shed. This portion of
the vacation would seam to be very advantageous to Sunset. The down side to
this is that a twenty foot by eighty foot easement will have to be recorded to allow
the City Light crew to maintain the electrical facility they have on the south edge
of the alley Right-of-Way_ Thus, there is effectively no gain in land, it is a transfer .
from a Right-of-Way to an Easement for the City.
..
e801SL3DOC
252
A-IT-A C Hrv\t:.-~TI A'
.
.
.
~~i11~;_jJ_'~d:::-:~';:~2~~~~?'~~;~~~::~'1~~i,:~:
"':"""I'-'~,
. '. ........<:~.. ..,
..,.....rs
. . . .~-'<:;
.. -'c:'tI
(-
r'
Thus, I would expect the city to look at this vacation as not a giving up of city
Right-of-Way but a reduction in liability. The ability of using the land as it is used
now by the city will remain through the easement.
Sincerely,
','
. "'~.;'.
. ':..~:'o 0.:, .~.
,t';;, '.~
~..7'" '.
'. .~~ ;~i~ ~.~
..:.~:'.'. :'" ..0
. .:.. '.: :." t~. .
._~;.- \~:~t.:
~ . i_.
. ... ":' ..
. . ..." Ot
i
: '~~.:''.:l
d
.. ~. ... ,
- . '.~':~~:~. ':.1
..' .
~: I ..:....: . ~
"' :
~iiI:~
Gene H. Unger, P.E~
incl.;
':~:,~,'," u
.... .,. .1"
. - -.. ... ,,~
,', ", " ..':, ':.j I
~ '_0.' ~
.- ':I .~~ I
'\ " ..:;.... ".
.. .~.i.~~ :.
. . ....y:.....~.:. ..
'. .", - :..'; . ')
.. : -,.... .'
,)~ ::-.;:':: ' :;
. .....' J
. "l'~,~:r.~' ~
, .. \.~~"l.''': ;,
. 1'. - _ ':;. : .. ,-;
... - . 4'.' ~ ", -,
.. ~': .:!;~!:: ~ ~
.::. .
....
253,
N018L3.DOC
Az
2
",. {f/":'!':~;t'
... .~....,"~ .
(
CITY. OF PORT ANGELE~
STREET VACATION PETITIO
.;'" "~~:"'_::--~-":-:" ..... :,-',:,-:,:,~::,'
ST\( ..'tI-:. o-:I
m m ~O Vrl;;,e
rn.~' .'
..~.. " .. co" :'.".-'."
':."-0 1"5.'
~, *'
TO: The City Coullcil of the City of Port Angeles. Washingtoll-
Come now the undersigned petitioners and pursuant to Chapter 35.7
POIll ANGE lES
.. T
,
1. The undersigned pet.itioners request that the following described portion of . Block 49
.. Street(Alley in-t.he City of Port Angeles be vacated pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW (Iegaliy describe ~he
property req'~esled for \.'Qcarioll be/ow).
lot 1 -8 and lots 1 3 - 20
2. Each of the undersigned petitioners is the owner of an interest in real estate abutting on the above
described area. ~
3. --Z- persons own property abulling on said area.
4. The names and addresses of property owners abutting on said areas are as follows:
Name Address
Mi c:hael R Scrrers
25895 Higt'way , 01, FOrt Angeles, WA ~
l..awrence ~ thsa1/Lisa L1sk
220 South Pine, FOrt Angeles, WA 98;363'
.
5 The undcrsq;ned petitioners conslItutc more th:lfI two thirds of the owners of said abutting
property
WHEREFORE, thepctiuoners ask that proceedings be commenced hereon for the vacation
of said area of s:ud Block 109 ~Alley in the manner prescribed in Chapter 35. 79 RCW.
Respectfully submitted,
~c Address
Snset WlI''e &fbpe ro fbx 1003, Fbrt Angeles, WA 9S362
By W1..ll1an T Ia1Ia1
1rJ:l'Z;; .(4~.-.
fhanc
~52-3341
.
File No.
Date Received
-----'.-
251
Hcanng(s) Dale
A3
:ti . . I.
_n_ --- 1n'J'I1Ur ~?dl.~.WiEt~EjUi .~U
#ifMm~ 1/11/1 . '..I1.l)1l11:5'fm01Jg!i5J4IIJJ~ID3@#i:'j?i ._ .
H!: . . 'I - . rm '. IHi ~ . 1llIII1I1rI!jjJ lIIJI11lil1J3] ... . . 6 ~ . fa ~a TfW U
~~~I~,'.~~i!l~ PI D'RI_i~f,~Q LO-l6 AlS.W~
~~Jl < .:.. ;tlryy..'. ~ ~"~~ .l.!2
> .' ~L '''0//,1"._. L. . IiWmmr ...... "::.. "
I \-00.. ff,>if' '".. _. '. .... .. . '. ,
~~~",,:r.P. ~ ". Y,({0:!I ~ <I/f~' ~~"":::~"'~I:-~Uil m :u.lliJ!~~
/}cSff;-&~//..,' ,).. ...zmr~Oi/<W/k:'((, ,<:: <~~:- :::". -: '.' ~:_._ _ _ . l
. 'k'1 fJ .,'./ ,. . f iJ"-1 ~'<.(.~} ~Jt, .. ..... ~ t;> a
~.., ~ ,~ I) -<.J;j1.fZ,'.j ~""'Q'. .' 5.( t . ':.. ,'." <,(' "N. s-
~~
'j '.: ~~'j'l ~ ~~ 'A."" '^'" ~ ~:.: " . <:0f;;../)> 1;/
. ~ ?'.~ (~. . ~'<I ' J fl<) . 'J'~;:@k; " .J;h...v'/I/;, ';{/J<
~. ~r~'~~ ~ &~ ~~~~m~~ ttJ;Pj,j:@~~,~~~
'/I^-0 /I~ ~/~'.~.].:...~.... )~""" ~'LA~"",I
' L ~ .,~ ~ . 1 j3t .: :~':. :i:::",... ,~. ,"'.-y, , .". .' ",. J .,,0 t.:.' I.: 'l>
I/J~ rl~'~ ~M~l..:~~:~~. "/~~&' 1 1.!lj9ft..4i.~" , :".~~f' -j':;>l".;/I./i
z ~.~ ....J. . :I..J:"...... . 'I'!.~'~ '. .... '<.../ /; /_, . .... "'. . ,. .~., /.' /'>.... ,
I ~~ rfi ~~ h '$., t"'LZt";;;:.,~~t/, ,'.f ;!f.' '<1"://),_".:. . .....,.. :;I.->;'~j~.~~
~" '..... ~ "<4, "1f1,:)J, ~t;!/-;.lj!/tyf'..(.I r;-~:-, <. . ""tl;'::.:;' .:~/ -y
-::: "J'~;J '~'~Ji.'l~"'. .~~'i)~l k-:).~~ ....~65!:~W~~'.l.~~"'<./.&;ll /Ji~?7~~'''N 1..'.....<...... : .:;'::,.~~; ~'>"~_1.
. " v: .I ~~0~ '<.! .,%;~'. .~":\.: :~'/l ~ .v.~:.~ . _C'Y/'': ~.... .'/..r I\":":~ ~
"......- / I...., "I' ,"- )00.,.. %''f:.../.':., ".;.".:y,. ~ JJ~"T.:., (f "''{~ 1:_. '!~'"'' .'~;'~.~ ,
"" "'.I "'...... , , · :'10 r I) .. , .'(-'. . ..~). ~ r'" # .. .,.. 6~ .. . .~. ,. ~. .
. '^ ,,~..... I~ 'V. .' I I '. .... j: :.; ... I., .? "', ,''" 'Ai.... '." -:.. ....:. .. '., . '/1 . ',)
'- ..." '6::-" ....., ........... , ... . '.. '''SZ' ' ... I, "':.rt 1//'" r,...",( "1'..' 'J ~ ~.I' I
. ntll ':Y" i':~~. I .' " I1. q:/.;: 1\;:........ . .-:. ...~ '.' · " ':'~ ... II ~'" I-/-/....w:./ ....""'" ".;., 'I"; .(
., .~i'''Y~o .r- -~'" . ~~.):.:c',);;':""~'.I/'" "'J.j" ....{....I".! 'j"..: ."'('.:.: ...~~..)..~~... j/,I."';'
~'.t. ...'-.~'" .. '-"""Ilik...'YIA.I.. .. ~ ~/.... ,.,". ,,(l.... "0"'1:. . ............ '.'. .,.......".." -",
....~...... "'... ....."'!'-..u'.,,..,~. "'1' ",,".. '.' ,. ~ ~. "v; .1'1""'" -'. ........-. ""'V)' t"
' " I Si . . .. . " . ..~ '- ~. I :C' ". >, . . . '. "../.
~"C ;\:o.~. x..'-.( . b,..' , I~.,,<!~ "Z,// . . ';"t.;.,' ,Y.;': .::: <".:., I>) ,~,,',~ I'. ~(:(i)., _ j":. .:. O!i(l " . .
'~~~ ...~.~ I~ ". '~"t;~~~.. ~",",.lu..~, , "!:.. "'-~1:1/ ?- ~v/ '"...:; /."! . "',,,'.'!>" ..' ?-,
... "" '. .'. ~. . . ,.". < .. .X;,.,.... ",,, . ....";, , " ~;' 1..,;- . ... ... . .". " ,,/ ,
,;,.X'''(~ ". '1 ..:. :'. '.. I;': /.' ':!.i'J;.''''''''-.:. .' ~;''''.' !';/'/~ ,!U.z.:, ~,...j 'f"/' ~;if..-<:;" .~r~iir.:
::;;. ''\... )C~. I '. .~ .-<.: '~'., ... ~'. ':1 "/;'.l:(.:.:.~.:.....{. .... '~':-11"'" .. ~~~~2~'~'i-!'l- ....~.. ,,'/J..:::',. ...... . .
. ," ,-'.-,:. . > 11',.;.::..., I~~ . " ~ . .. . . , .', . ,', '.. .. '. ...,~ .
~ ; ~... ~" .. .....' i' :,cT,,,.:,'...t.;.~, "" .. . ,x. .'...... <.: j~".; .:.' '.:!F .<, .<.,y,.... '.
~,.......' '111...""~ ,,)\ 'f.0: . ....... 'I.~'tl.t:r.'a: .':'...:....~..:...i. . ""'. .T.f.. Y}........ .:' ('/" It'/......,::. './o' .o'. ;'. :' ;;. '''It':','
.,~ '1.)<,,':</..... . .. .,',. . ".'t-.,~.,.... ./.;. " ~ .,.. ~';''', .. .: "'..... ._. . '. ,
L'~ ~',~~'. "". I.'>.... .' ;,['l~'.i-~.;(~~': . .~:-o;;;;: _:., ,'" "'.' i;'r'-v:; "'t!. '}:'I>:"~~~':" "'..... ':.~
t~ "~"WA~ ,"., .. .'. " . n~ "'t,'lji: :.'H~' , .'.""i.' .' / 'u. -; .. I.. ...' <. ,~:. .-9 h. .
~.~ ~,~'- ~)....~... ;. ~ . ~: ..~~l . ":~" ~~/:")~ ~. ';:':/IIR{!;jI;,J1- .:~::/ ,,-.> '.. .' ..~::..r.z(tr'
. . . ,~~ ~'\v'~" "'~'."'~~""~ . .:.: .'" ~;. , .;" .'~' t.qi': ~'. .:~, J ~'. .... ~... ....,~ I/~~". . . 'Stil;' 11'
~ '~..; ,... . ." ..'\" ... . .'-..,... .~. ..., Z .' . . ,.~.~. I~y , '.,. : ....'.
'~i; . "JiX .~~..~ '.. , :'~,. ,.. ~ "11" ~.... ., .. ,.,'. I ~. . .. " "'..' 7..",.. ,.' '._
. . .',. '< . ". ......,. 'if /. . ,. '.:' /.. ,... . .,,~. ":<;", . """., . "&;" ",',' .".
~.'~ o{l~' '10:' 'O,..'. .', . -~;:. :.(~~, I ,,~ ~/l '. " . ..:)./, . :<;;1' ';-"~r~~:".' i/ .":' ~".tt"'" ..:,'
. "....~... n~/ ~. ^ · v' . 'f""-/ ..... "...-., ~ If,,' . < ". ..
l~ ~ ~ ~""V''''''u ,.. '. ~/../ ~ .*.' r." Ij,' :';".. ':/.+ . '(/,..-. ...{~,. "'ill. ;"',' -< 0 'Z.'lI' . .
t' n -... ....~ ~ ...'...' ...... /.;. ........ _" 's; /.v!"K~ ... ~"'." f."~; ~. .' .. ."'. ':. ..
~~~'''''); "!'7"..,;~ ..v>~""~( '''''./,l) .~. Si... .......'..'{:.,'..~ M!"~J ")::'~''','tIt ...... .....'
"-~~-::-~~. .:~~'l' ~ ..~..;' ,,}"L",f11:,,:,:,.. j;.J; .;.' . .'." f/"A~ h ......' 6~~
~~~ ~(&) ,:.~.,~)~:~ + '-}0'; ; .:......;: ~ :~~.'1. :'.l!o......... .~., . I.. vOii7. ........
. .'/ "'''. .... .'.... '., . ',' 'U ..,'. ' +;ox... ,:..' . ,';' It;, <T" .
' .'. . ..' t t... ".. . .. . ~,' ".;; .s!-.'.".: .... .,.<~.... '7
.'i "': :-.l:'.. t. · ... ! .... ',,~ . ......>>".!. ."/ /iSJ4( 'y
~ ~... .:...........J;'ot ..... ~"i.~' ~ a~.
.. Cll[ '-". \:...J5;".. ''''';''.: .. : .: ! -.l< ' "',. .. .. . . ~
.. ~~"'t.... ....,,~~~~ . .~:r v;... :'~\'~ ' ...4f ..lll.;
· ,.., . I ,.~ '''% ~ ,,",>b~\f.1 " :. '1~" ., .,. .
'. I .1 ~ ~'j, J. . .'.: ",' '.!y.l .' 'J ' .
t-. I17J"t .~............ ~ ,/Jj~~ to . ,'.1: .', Iii 41" '. L.o.l;:/ ,
,,"/."'" ....~'..'...~. .,. ,... '.' ... "". ~. _.;.J~J,:,~ . "~~//l... ". .....~,
~N L.. ...., · . , . . . '.:G: :'1 T. . "'c'< . ~"~" . '..
. ,,' ~~~. ~.aib) - · . . . . . : :. . } "@ '''' ~ l(" (..~ . "'. "'~.flI:"'.... '''>< '; '. ."....
' ,1.1. . , . _ O"AI ~J )'~.. r"l'''. . . ..~~. M
VII ..... ~". 'i.1 · .... . ,. .. . . . '. -r.). .. ~ ~ . "'7' .:..../ '. _
'. . . . .. 'M........ )0.", ..,."
.2'!' !..~ : :.: . . . . . c,< "
f7V
ss
,.y.
. ,
0,.,,-
.~~
c:
5
...
I
~
I
I
I
.1
.
3
:)
2
n
.
6-
~.ti. I
J,..
, ~~i;-:h~,~~::
..' ''''"-'.' ,,-,
"
c::,\;j
-
uSG
'j
~
}
. I
~ -.J
'\..4 'd...
-'bll1 "....-0 2',
'P.,.OI .
t\~'OVI'~ \..ou~I"" 1fl1 -
aooOb1>OQc;:>QC) ~"o
po a
'>4 S II ~S17
l..40CSt\lJ W~
3?N3d~7
(g7l.''7'~)
.ao:Jo;y .3' I (YJ ..1 CilS "'" n.c. ..,
0000 I bt>ooQOOCi;~
(. b l~'<a, )
s:awOS J.3'V 11-:1 \ "V
\
(~l'U11 Pl
adeT2J ~I('t'\ ..L~C"\..4('lS to
OOC107 b'tl- QOcx::x:)Ci:~o
tt.L lL..v$
U <-A ~f 't::f~tI S .
o oooE bl>> ~Q e.c:JO
( c1) \ -\( )
0;] E';311Y1 ..J,..7JSLI(JS
...
..
OOOOsbP<.700Qa~d)
tu.1t.us '-au J\, ~HS 0
-
-
-
OOQQ1>hi> 0 QQGJQ.d1 a
I
I .
, I
I I
I -
I
,~!~;'Kr~~~ff;~-:' \~',:~; ';;:?::>:':',L
f_,
~i"
"
NO. 736
!';,i-... '. .:.:. '
r,.~~'9~~"
"'
",
(I
.'1;"' '.,
"It ~~ ..
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
.
ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
Adoption of: DNS No. 115. EIS. ..__ Other:
Description of Current Project: A proposal to vacate City right-of-way on' propeny that
contains an environmentally sensitive area (ESA) and located in the IL. Industrial Light, zone.
APPLICANT:
Bill Hermann dba SUNSET WIRE ROPE
Location:
518 Marine Drive
Title/description of document being adopted: A determination of non significance (DNS #715)
prepared for construction of the main warehouse building on the propeny adjacent to the right-of-
way which was for the rebuild of a large warehouse structure that was destroyed during the winter
1996-97 storms. The current proposal is in association with that redevelopment project.
Agcncy/Applicant that prcpared the document being adopted: Bill Hermann. dba Sunset Wire ..
Rope.
Date the adopted document was prepared: March 5, 1997.
The DNS was not challenged. Peninent application materials are available for review at the City
of Pon Angeles Planning Depamnent. 321 East Fifth Street. Pon Angeles. Washington, Monday
thfough Friday, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. .-
The previous document has been identified and adopted as being appropriate for this proposal after
independent review. The document meets our envi.FOnmental review needs for the current
proposal and will accompany the proposal lathe decisionmaker.
NAME OF AGENCY ADOPTING THE DOCUMENT: City. of Port Angeles
Contactl SEP A Responsible Omcial:
Datc: JuneJO..J9.91
Brad Collins, Planning Director
321 East Fifth Street, Pan Angeles, W A 98362
Phone Number: (360) 417-4750
Signature: ~~ ~.: -' _____
Brad <f~iii;;;' Planning Director
I~
rUB: 6/ VJ.1V7
.
. ...--...... .........,
258
11\'i'"1 r LI. ,.. .-. r-- R
.
.
.
I .
..
..
257
v
r
e
ESA 97-01
S 18 Marine Drive
.:
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA ApPROVAL
MARINE BLUFF/GEOLOGICAL HAzARD (Steep SlopelLandslide)
-
File Number:
ESA 97-01
( .
Applicant: Sunset Wire Rope Company
Owner: Sunset Wire Rope Company
Proposed Action: Replacement of building and new construction totaling 18,810 sf
Location: 518 Marine Drive
SEPA:
A Determination of Non-Significance (# 715) was issued for the proposal on March 5, 1997.
. Decision:
.
Based on the information provided and as conditiolled below, the proposed project located at 518
Marine Drive (please see attached application) meets the requirements for development on a property
which contains a locally unique feature (marine bluB) and a geological hazard area (landslide &
erosion) as identified in the City's Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protection Ordinance (pAMC
1"5.20) and as concluded below. -
For mannr bluff areas:
PAMC Section 15.20.070, B, 4:
The proposed construction method'will:
a. Not adversely impact the stability of ravine sidewalls and bluffs;
b. Not increase erosjon and mass movement potential of ravine sidewalls and
bluffs;
c.
Use construction techniques which minimize disruption of the existing
topography and vegetation; and
d.
253
Include measures to overcome any geological, soils and hydrological
constraints of the site.
City of Pori A"g~/~s Planning Departn'~"I. J11 E. Stl, St.. Port Angelel, WA 98362, 360-117-4750. (fax) <117.<1609 K )
/'
/
ESA 97'()1
518 Marine Drive
fa
t:
March 5,1997
Page 2
e.
The buffer from the top of the marine bluff is not reduced to less than 2S feet.
.
For Landslide haZArd areas: .
PAMC Section 15.20.070 C. 1:
a. There will be no increase in swface water discharge or sedimentation to
adjacent propenies;
I .
, b. There will be no decrease in slope stability on adjacent propenies; and
(ill) The alteration is so minor as not to pose a threat.
Conditioo(s) or Approval:
1. The applicant shall comply with all recommendations contained in the repon dated
January 24, 1997 and prepared by Polaris Engineering and Surveying, Inc. and
attached as pan of Attachment A.
2, Land clearing, grading or filling shall be limited to the period between April 1 st and
October 1 st.
3.
Vegetation on steep slopes shall be preserved or replaced.
.
4 The project shall be subject to erosion control measures required by the Public Works
Depanment.
5 The project shall meet City standards for stormwater runoff improvements.
..
.'
"'>/i jq 1
Date '
Bra Collins. Planning Director
City of Pon Angeles
c I()f1"1CE\~"ll.1NIWPDOCS\ESAaA9'701.0HA
~~!1.
City of Port Allgtles Planning Dtpor""tnl. J2/ E. 51h SI.. PorI Angeles. WA 98362.360-417-4750. (far) ~17-4609 \3> '3
rn
J.~ lC~ .;.~..:.... ( ~rJYd 'St"" \T1f
~29W8. l~'
.
June 18, 1998
I .
I :
TO:
Tim Smith, Public Works Department
Fire Department
Police Department
,,/ ~ LJ (J~.~
SUBJ: STREET VACATION PETITION - STY 98-03
HERMANN - Portion of the 2/3 alley in Block 49 south of Marine Drive
The Planning Department has received a petition for vacation of a portion of the Marine/Second
Street alley in Block 49. Please review the petition and identify those issues that relate to your
departmental concerns. A response to the Planning Department no later than .-J.une.22..l9..2.8, is .
appreciated. Please be sure to note any concerns your departments have with regard to compliance
with the City's LOS standards should the vacation be approved.
If you have any questions, please call or stop by the department. Thank you.
l. L I &-l11
R-6s e -se(1\-ucTle1
2.
Na ex t ~ -r: ~-t,n../ I..-~ u"l-
rfct:--( L,rr/~ 't--J ...Oc L/C,.;e-{ ,,1>J!)
..,
pJO o(rtJ~ ,'/LoJ- Tb V~~.
~f5L-.J6k----
1==u'TLl!-<S' A.I~-
'3
A---'{;:(~/qy
262
.
~T\n. \ \..\ M,::- ~\\r
.
( -
.
..
.-
.
4) ~ .,
':"{'1
.
.
(
.; ..
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
321 East Fifth Street~ Pan Angeles. Washington (360) 417-4750
,oL.ANN,,,,G
June 18. 1998
TO:
Tim Smith, Public Works Department ,;-~.
Fire Department
Police Department
PORT ANGELES
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUB]: STREET V ACA TION PETITION - STV 98-03
HERMANN - Portion of the 2/3 alley in Bloc:k 49 south of Marine Drive
The Planning Department has received a petition fo~ vacation of a portion of the Marine/Second
Street alley in Block 49. Please review. the petition and identify those issues that relate to;your
depanmental concerns. A response to the Planning Department no later than .J.UDe 29, 1998.. is
appreciated. Please be sure to note any concerns your departments have with regard to compHance
with the Clty's LOS standards should the vacation be approved.
. .
If you have any questions, please call or stop by the departri1ent.Thank y()u.
~1Y ~'H"H~ ~O ~~-rIOU TZ:> 11\\$
\J~~l1DtJ) ~11:~ ~ A u>-kWll'e-
'II-( eo~ L.o~ ~~l~tpe;.t:> FO~
I>cU ~("1"(t1JG; ~~E..-~ ..~u ou ~
A~~ ~~C-t\. 1\feOu.>~~Ct--~-r
W\~V1l\\~ \?lAA\C.l~- ~ ,; ~oJ{:".
b~ t.?.. c:r 5
263
(/
MEMORANDUM
Coral Wheeler
Administrative Assistant
ext 4650
P"'Jce W. Becker
Fire Chief
ext 4651
Daniel K. McKeen
Fire Marshal
ext 4653
L. Keith Sogues
T raining Officer
ext 4652
James B. (Duke) Moroz
Medical Officer
ext 4665
360-417 -4655
.~ .
(
(
ROUTE TOI .
,Building Dept. IJ
Planning Dept. Jil
Public Works IJ
. City Manager IJ
fD) IH~~ n W ~ fill i
UIJ ~ 2 4 913 ill
DATE:
June 22, 1998
PORT ANGELES
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
TO:
Planning Department
D~
FROM:
Dan McKeen, Fire Marshal
RE:
Street Vacation Petition STV 98-03
Hermann - Portion of 2/3 alley in Block
49 south of Marine Drive
.
The Fire Department has reviewed the request for a
street vacation for a portion of the Marine
Drive/Second Street alley in Block 49 and has no
objections.
DM/cw
..' .
264
.
FP - 26
Page 1 of 1
AT\AC.t-\HEJJ"\ 1)
.
.
.'"
.
()~ - .
,.. p .~
..,.,
.;:,.~,.,-".... .. .
.:~~
-::-'!o
.:._"
I .
.ft
v;
~
Me"""
... ---
-
Date: 06/25/98
r
("
SIrw lIl, CIaf o/l'flm
r- .",. DqNq QUI
NIItIIIIi Wu, ,.,.0. MIIIIIIpr
"""" HIIII6*I. AIIINiII ..,...,
W II @ II 0 W IE Q ""'=.E
I a. 2 6 1998 I J : Erick z.,pe,. S.,,1iIIII
wun I il i . r"" Go1kIPn'. Snrlillll
L:J Lit. ZelU1nUrn. Records SupmVor
HtIIIIIin. ConurumietIIiDn SupmVor
HtJ/IIDII. ComnumiaJIiDIIS SuptnVor
DI. PORT ANGELES
rLl\NNING DEPARTMENT .
To: DEPUfY CHIEF TOM RIEPE
[] Communications
Distribution: [Xl Addressee Only
[] Records [) A
From: Sgt. Gale
Subject:
Street V
#217-030-98
The location of the alley is in the storage yard for Sunset Wire and Rope. The vacation
will have no impact on this Department.
Page 1
26~
Al\AC}.\MEMl E
.
.
.
.
.
.
~ ~
tv
0')
-"l
.
.
.
. CLALLAM COUNTY HUMANE IL TER REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE , . J?
Jan Feb Mar Apr May JI Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dee YTD ;
ACO StlClY Dun-- 9 16 17 11 11 10
ACO Gift Dogs 0 0 u U 4 0 4:
PA Citizen Stray Dugs 6 1 .. .. 2 . 4 2 1 ~
PA Citizen Sun Dogs 17 9 B 14 6 22 761
5/0 Truck Stray Dugs 8 10 8 8 10 10 54,
5/0 Truck Surr Dogs 1 14 3 2 8 0 281
County Public Stray Dogs 20 8 12 9 6 5 601
County, Public Sun Dogs 31 15 22 18 20 26 132!
Dogs left at Shelter 22 26 16 '25 12 30 1 31
City Adopted Dogs 7 12 8 10 14 8 59
County Adopted Dogs 22 20 26 18 19 24 129
LAS RTO Dogs 2 0 1 1 2 3 9
ACO/RTO Dogs 7 6 8 4 9 6 40
PA Citizen RTO Dogs 5 0 4 6 1 3 19
County RTO Dogs 14 9 5 10 9 8 55
LL\S PTS Dogs .9 8 7 8 3 11 461
ACO Dogs PTS 3 7 4 0 3 1 18 i
PA Citizen Dogs PTS 10 6 2 10 6 10 44
County Dogs PTS 20 35 18 10 16 22 1 21
LAS DOA Dogs ".,. 1 1 0 1 0 1 4
"".:; ACO DOA [X)gs 0 " 1 2 0 0 4
PA Citizen DOA Dogs 1 2 2 1 0 0 61
County DOA Dogs 2 2 3 5 1 2 1~1
ACO Quarantine Dogs 0 0 0 0 0 0
PA Citizen Quarantine Dogs 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 ~
County Quarantine Dogs 0 2 1 1 1 2 7
City Dogs Stolen 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
County Dogs Stolen 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
Total incoming Dogs 1 1 4 99 85 9 1 79 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 575 ~
lotal Adopted Dogs 29 32 31 28 33 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 188
r otal Dogs PTS 42 56 3 1 28 28 44 0 0 O. 0 0 0 229
Total DOA Dogs 4 5 6 9 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
r otal RTO Dogs 28 1 5 1 8 2 1 2 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 23
lotal Complaints Handled in 7 7' 6 8 2 1 3 1 i
j :..
0)
(X)
, ,
.,~~~:
CLALLAM COUN1Y HUMANE SHEL1'ER REPOR" FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE, 1998
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun J u I Aug Sep Oet Nov Dee YTD
ACO Stray Cats 9 71 n 11 9 17 89
ACO Gift Cats 0 0 U 0 0 0 0
PA Citizen Stray Cats 4 2 2 9 5 10 32
PA Citizen Surr Cats 11 11 6 11 7 32 78
S/O Truck Stray Cats -1 5 ?7 1 7 3 47
S/O fruck Surr Cats 0 2 1 .1 0 () 7
County Public Str ay Cats 1 6 .\ 11 7 1<1 52
County Public Surr Catc; 21 18 19 13 41 37 149
Cats Left at Shelter 14 20 B 4 21 55 122
City Adopted Cats 14 13 7 5 17 6 62
County Adopted Cats 12 7 1'4 13 11 17 74
ACO/RTO Cats 0 3 3 1 0 1 8
PA Citizen RTO Cats 1 0 0 2 0 2 5
County Rl 0 Cats 0 2 1 1 0 0 4
LAS RTO Cats 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
ACO Cats PfS 4 8 9 4 7 8 40
PA Citizen Cats PTS lO 9 7 4 7 30 67
I
I County Cats PTS 20 17 37 15 27 39 155
LAS Cats PTS 8 9 5 9 10 38 79
I 1 6
; ACO OOA Cats 3 3 3 2 1 4
I PA Citizen DOA Cats 0 f. 0 2 0 3 7
County DOA Cats 3 2 5 4 2 2 18
I LAS DOA Cats 1 1 2 1 2 0 7
Cats Escaped 0 0 1 0 0 0
Total incoming Cats 70 85 89 67 97 168 0 0 0 0 0 0 576
Total Adopted Cats 26 20 2 1 1 8 28 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 136
Total Cats PTS 42 43 58 32 5 1 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 341
I Cats
Total DOA 7 8 1 0 9 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 48
Totai RTO Cats 1 5 4, 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7
PA Citizens Other Animals 3 0 0 1 1 1 5
ACO Other Animals 1 1 2 0 2 0 6
! County Other Animals 16 4 5 6 0 4 35
LAS Other Animals 3 2 0 . 0 0 1 (,
-'"
. ..,I
~
:..J
.
.
.
.
Memorandum
Steve Ilk, Chief of Police
Tom Riepe, Deputy Chief
Naomi Wu. Comm Manager
Karen Haugstad. Admin Asst.
.
.
#038-'1998
. ,I-",
LJ.,J+.[ t-
,.<.........1..'.........
'1
Date:
July 31, 1998
To:
Patrick Ibarra, City Manager
Mayor Gary Braun and City Council Members
From:
Steve Ilk, Chief of po~
File
Craig Knutson, City Attorney
Kay Godbey, Finance Director
cc:
Subject:
Electronic Home Monitoring and Alternative Incarceration - Update
Information Onlv - No Action Reauired
I
This is an approximate six month update on the progress of the Electronic Home
Monitoring program and the alternative incarceration in the Forks Jail. The savings
reflected in this memorandum do not include the Community Service Program and
numbers are rounded to the nearest hundred.
Electronic Home Monitoring - January through July 1998
To date the Electronic Home Monitoring Program has saved $34,500 in jail costs for 1998
through the first seven months. That's the equivalent of 697 days of electronic home
monitoring by 22 individuals. Program costs have been $4,000 while we have received
$4,800 paid by the users of the program.
Forks Jail Contract... January through June 1998
We've housed ten prisoners in the Forks jail at a savings of approximately $3,200. Forks
jail expenses during this period were $17,950. The prisoners sent to Forks are those who
are serving at least five days in jail and have no pending court appearances. For two months
of this period during a remodel the jail was full, limiting our ability to send prisoners to
Forks. We are charged a one-time fee of $10 per prisoner for transportation of prisoners to'
the jail.
Total savings between these two programs is approximately $37,700 (does not include the
Community Service Program).
Clallam County Corrections Facility - January through May 1998
The City's cost for housing prisoners in the Clallam County jail during the first five months
of 1998 was $96,100.
Total costs for housing prisoners during the first six months of the year is estimated at
$133,500. Monthly jail bills vary considerably and a more precise estimate for annual
expense isn't possible at this time. Our annual jail budget is $250,000 and several expenses
for the Community Service Program have also been taken from that line item.
270
271.
.
.
.
:'"
1-
.
.
.
~ ! ; j /... r . . ../ ~~">.'."..
~/'/L/J-f:J L.- . ....,'..,..;;
, .
;<"'\.?..:.....;;. '.
. .-........-....
. -........... ....
. d' ..........
.. .............
... ..................
.... ................
. . . . . . . . . - . . , . . . . . ' . .
July 29, 1998
TO:
Mayor Braun, City Council Members and Manager Ibarra
John Hicks, Recreation M~__
Clallam County Physicians C~~ Benefit Fund
FR:
RE:
As council will recall, we are in the preliminary stages .of a feasibility study on William Shore Pool.
As part of the project we are exploring the possibility of additional amenities to the pool such as a
hydro therapy pool. With that in mind, we submitted an application through the Clallam County
Physicians Community Benefit Fund for the purpose of securing additional funding. On July 28,
we received a preliminary grant award of$15,000 for this project, see attached letter.
We will be working closely with the pool consultant on ways to incorporate this intcithe pool
project.
cc: Scott Brodhun, Director Parks & Recreation
272
-
-
,,:* .
. ~ ..~.
. . ' .:. '..":..' ,(':t...i
ClalIam County Physicians Community-Benefit Fund')",'
PO ~~X3005 · P~~~1!1~~l~~.1.!~~h~gt~n '?~~~2", ' :
t. ," { : ft
July 25, 1998
1
'I
Scott Brodhun, Director of Parks & Recreation
City of Port Angeles Parks & Recreation
321 East 5th
Port Ang~les, WA 98362
SUBJECT: CLALLAM COUNTY PHYSICIANS COMMUNITY BENEFIT FUND
GRANT PRELIMINARY AWARD
Dear Mr. Brodhun:
We are pleased to inform you that your grant request to the
Clallam County Physicians Community Benefit Fund (CCPCBF) has
been PRELIMINARILY approved in the amount of $15,000.00.
In order to proceed with a final award, we require the following
information:
1. written evidence that your overall project has received
all public and/or private approvals necessary for you to
proceed with and complete your project.
2. written evidence that all other funding necessary to the
successful completion of the project has been received
or committed (that is, funding other than that approved
by CC.~CBF L.
3. copies of all paid vendor invoices for expenses needed
to complete the project. CCPCBF will make one lump sum
payment to your agency at the conclusion of your project.
We will reserve these funds for you for the identified purpose(s)
of your grant request, and for no other purpose, until
June 15, 2000. Any funds unclaimed by that date will be returned
to the pool of funds available for that year's funding cycle.
273
..... "
.
I .
.
.
.
.
.
-4... . I r....
...{}t~';J~~.:")..~:.'- . .
. . ,: "-'.~.'>!""';"~"t~ :'~;~;'.':""'" ~..~........ "
Congratulations on your preliminary approval and best wishes
in your very worthwhile project. .
Sincerely,
CLALLAM COUNTY PHYSICIANS COMMUNITY BENEFIT FUND
~~.k2 4~
Charles R. Turner
Chairman
CRT/dkr
.
"
274
..
:1
l)~:-:
Iw ( ..1
>........'1.........
~~:
.:"
r
.
.
.
.
City Manager's
Office
Memorandum
Patrick Ibarra
City Manager
..~narcm "Sam" Martin
Exec. Admm. Assistant
Reck" 1. l pton. ole
City Clerk
.\/anagt'mt'nt ,,/sslstant .
Robert Coons
1!lImon R/!.murct!s .\Ianag/!r
Cami/It' lIeadrlck
I/uman R/!.Wlurct!s Asslslant
.
lj3/~. 'U-J
...'[..1.............
.'. .
. ~
J.
~
_/
TO:
MAYOR BRAUN & CITY COUNCIL
~ A TRICK mARRA, CITY MANAGER
FROM:
DATE:
July 31,1998
MISCELLANEOUS
RE:
A few items I wanted to bring to your attention. First is my home address,
2503 South Lincoln, and phone number, 417-8959, for your records. Second,
the Summer Conference of the Washington City Management Association is
scheduled for August 19-21, at Ocean Shores. While I hesitate to attend and
be out of the office so early in my tenure, I believe it would prove useful in
acquainting me with my colleagues around the State. I have fOUJld this sort
of networking is beneficial for when a situation arises I need to confer with
other city management types and how they responded to similar
circumstances. After reviewing the Conference Agenda, I would only be
attending the first two days, the 19th and 20th and return the evening of the
20th. During this time, I would recommend Jack Pittis be placed in
responsible charge. If acceptable to Council, I would like to attend.
A totally difference subject, I would also like to know which Council
members are "on-line" so if need be, I can communicate via the Internet.
Finally, I along with several others will be out of the office on Thursday,
August 6, and Tuesday, August 11, making visits on behalf of the Rayonier
Mill closing. On the 6th, we will be visiting the Department of Ecology and
on the lith, the U.S. EPA.
276
'!f""
\"
J-. ::~
-~-
.
.
. ~7'~' .