Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 11/19/2002 '. ~ORTANGELES WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. AGENDA '\ CITY COUNCIL MEETING 321 EAST FIFTH STREET November 19, 2002 REGULAR MEETING - 6:00 p.m. A. CALL TO ORDER - Regular Meeting (6:00 p.m.) ROLL CALL- PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - PUBLIC CEREMONIES, PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS 1. Proclamation & Presentation of Distinguished Service Medal in recognition of Leland L. Lee's dedication to the City of Port Angeles 2. Recognition of Mike McCawley's service to the City of Port Angeles - Police Department 1 Presentations Presentation . B. WORK SESSION Presentation of Parking Garage Feasibility Study by Darrell Vange, Ravenhurst 3 Presentation C. LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON TillS OR FUTURE AGENDAS (By Council, Staff or Public) AND PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA (This is the opportunity for members of the public to speak to the City Council about anything not on the agenda, please keep comments to 5-10 minutes.) D. FINANCE 1. Design Services for Oil Handling and 47 Approve Agreement Warehouse Building, Project 21-21 2. Replacement of Emergency Generator for 55 Authorize Purchase Wastewater Pump Stations 3. Transmission Rate Case Settlement 57 Accept Settlement E. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City Council minutes of November 5, 2002 59 Approve Consent Agenda 2. Check List - November 12,2002- 71 $837,798.08 3. Electronic Payments - November 8, 2002 - 87 $921,655.00 4. Amendment No.3 to Consultant Agreement, 89 Port Angeles International Gateway F. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS . NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK November 19,2002 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - 1 ,--------- I . G. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC HEARINGS 2003 Property Tax Levy 91 Adopt Ordinance H. RESOLUTIONS I. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Laurel Street Slide Repairs Report 95 Project Update J. PUBLIC HEARINGS - QUASI-JUDICIAL (7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter) K. PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER 1. Water-Wastewater Rates - Continue Public Hearing 2. Mischke Street Vacation - STV 02-03 3. 2003 Budget Hearing 97 Adopt Ordinance 105 133 Approve as Recommended by Real Estate Committee Continue Public Hearing to Dec. 3, 2002 . L. INFORMATION 1. City Manager's Calendar (Page 137) o Parks & Recreation Special Events & Tournaments: Economic Impact Presentation (Page 139) o Institutional Network Construction Status Report (Page 143) o Loan application for Downtown Watermain (Page 147) 2. Planning Commission Minutes - October 23,2002 (Page 149) 3. Public Works & Utilities Monthly Report - October 2002 (Page 153) 4. Community Development Monthly Report - October 2002 (Page 155) 5. Police Department Monthly Report - October 2002 (Page 157) M. EXECUTIVE SESSION (As needed and determined by City Attorney) N. ADJOURNMENT PUBLIG...HEARINGS Public hearings are set by the City Council in orderto lTIeeflegalrequiremel1ts.peltairiil1gto matters such as, land use permit applications, proposed amendments to City land use regulations,zoningchang~s,tannexati()l'Is.lhaddition,the City Council may set a public hearing in order to receive public input prior to making decisions which impact the Citizens. Certail1 matters rnay be controversial, and the City Council may choose to seek public opinion through the public hearing process. . \. . G:ICNCLPKTlAGENDAI02-11-19 age.wpd i'. I I NOTE: HEARING DEVICES AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE MAYOR TO DETERMINE TIME OF BREAK November 19,2002 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page - 2 FORTANGELES CITY OF 'PORT ANGELES WAS H I N G TON. U. S. A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING: II. ROLL CALL: -I Members Present: Mayor Wiggins V Councilman Braun /' Councilman Campbell V' Councilmember Erickson V Councilman Headrick ~ Councilmember Rogers / / Councilman Williams ./' Staff Present: Manager Quinn Attorney Knutson Clerk Upton v" v B. Collins M. Connelly G. Cutler D. McKeen T. Riepe y. Ziomkowski v" ~ /' V V m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: LedbY:~ ~ November 19_ 2002 fo:rV Other Staff Present: ~.- , ~~ -r~ "1. p.~ ~~~ t tfl~ / ~ ~ \ CITY OF PORT ANGELES .~ORT.AN'GELES WAS H I N G TON. U. S. A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING Attendance Roster DATE OF MEETING: November 19. 2002 LOCATION: City Council Chambers City of Port Angeles FORTANGELES OrdinanceIResolution Distribution List WAS H I N G TON. U. S. A. City Council Meeting of November 19. 2002 ~ f<)A," ~~a ~ \/ r/j~ ~ n . H A./ q City Manager / City Atty. (1) I 7 ,7 Plannin~ /' / ~v ~~../ I City Clerk (2) Deputy Clerk (1) 1/ , -/ Personnel ; Cust. Svcs. 1../ Finance ../ 1/ Dir. /M~r. I Police Dept. Fire Dept. Li~ht Dept. Pub. Works (2) :J../ Parks & Rec. MRSC (1) , ..,/ ,I PDN (Summary) ~.",fH Nt W\ J ~.1 ftA M " - Extra Copies /J n. I ~-h- W'" <i./ h'O 0 ~ ,7 , ~ - I TOTAL I (j I 1 . PROCLAMATION Leland 1. Lee Port Angeles Police Department Citizen Volunteer Chairman - Port Angeles Police Department Law Enforcement Advisory Board WHEREAS, Leland L. Lee served the citizens of Port Angeles as a charter member of the Port Angeles Police Department Citizen Volunteers beginning in May of 1997; and' WHEREAS, Leland L. Lee was an original member ofthe Law Enforcement Advisory Board from its inception in June of 1993 and was serving as chairman during his most recent term; and . WHEREAS, the citizens of Port Angeles, and particularly the law enforcement community, benefitted t;remendously from the hundreds of hours of time donated by Leland Lee that served to enhance the security of our community and the ability of the Police Department to better serve the public; and WHEREAS, in the words of former President Ronald Reagan, "No matter how big and powerful government gets, and the many services it provides, it can never take the place ofvolunteers"; and WHEREAS, Leland L. Lee exemplified through his commitment to community service the highest ideals of a citizen volunteer prior to his tragic death on October 20, 2002; NOW, THEREFORE, WITH GREAT PRIDE AND GRATITUDE, on behalf of the City Council of Port Angeles, I hereby approve and posthumously award Leland L. Lee the law enforcement Distinguished Service medal in recognition of his years of dedicated service and sacrifice to the citizens of Port Angeles and the Port Angeles Police Department while serving as a member of the police department's Citizen Volunteers and Law Enforcement Advisory Board. - .- ,-.-~ ~- GlennWiggins, Mayor November 1 2002 . . I, " Parking Garage Feasibility Study . Prepared for The City of Port Angeles . Presentation by: ", Darrell Vange Ravenhurst Development, Inc. . u . . . 4 .~' tJ~t~ M <> ~ <t QMl ~. ~ : ~ $: Z l ;:t ~C -~ zC/':; (J~ .. . I I I I ~- I -0 I I <t \ I '-I~- - I VI ~ I \\. ., ., . - w... ~ ~ . · 0 ~ tt;I.'; ~.-I ~ - --., ~ : - ~ -= ~ \ ~~~~ I ~~ ~~ rW ~;. it ~ l~ ~J ~ I'~ f' ~ I (f ~ ~ I , ~ - If 'I '\. ~ '\.~) ~ - to I~X: .~) ~ it . - I~t.~ - ~- \\ZI. 11 \ \1 \\ . Jt , ~ ~ t fl / '-'-2J.,i I - . I I . i " .....:-- , ~. ~ 1\ . 'A~'0 !) ~j~ - I . City of Port Angeles, 2002 PARKING GARAGE FEASIBiliTY STUDY . ~ ! :'..7.';'::'.:::",.:::~:,."::L"::",,:-~':': '.' "':_..'~-:-;:::"7_:'::'.<'.-:-:T-::~,:::-,~~."':::Y,,;,""7':""::-,"::::' . ....._-. ...l A PARKING GARAGE FEASIBILITY STUDY "'I I Prepared for The City of Port Angeles i. i!i I ;.. Prepared by: Ravenhurst Development, Inc. . October 241 2002 . 7 . -' ~ 3 ill i 1. ,.,; Ifj .~ . Introduction DRAFT The report contains a number of tables and financial analyses, but please keep in mind that it is a detailed analysis of a very conceptual program. The conclusions . of this report do not constitute. a sufficient basis to decide to construct a garage; at best, they should be the basis for a decision to take some specific next steps. All of the numbers are estimates and there is a factor of uncertainty in everything. This is only the first step in a long and complicated exercise. If the basic premise is accepted, there is another layer of projections, budgeting, negotiations and community input. The purpose of this report is to suggest an approach and put out some hypothetical numbers. It should not be relied upon as a final assessment or financing analysis. Parking Garage Study for Port Angeles Ravenburst Development, Inc. l0/24/02 9 Page 1 . DRAFT Executive Summary I Conceptual Plan: the conceptual plan is to construct a parking garage of approximately 350 parking spaces on either the City Light parcel on Front Street west of Oak, or on the Tidelands West block, along Front Street east of Oak. Parking Shortfall: When the Gateway project is completed and the Oak .Street site is developed, there will be a shortfall of nearly 250 parking spaces for tourists and ferry passengers during the peak summer months. Construction Costs: Construction costs for a 350 stall garage are estimated to be $5.5 million, excluding land, which is assumed to be contributed by the City. Costs per stall are estimated at between $13,000 an~ $15,000. Because there is no design or schedule for the garage, the estimates include a generous contingency, but the pricing is based on a fairly plain structure. Funding Sources: If the City contributed $1.5 million in proceeds from the Tidelands East land sales along with the land for the garage, and if the hotel contributed at least $1.5 million for 150 parking spaces, and iHhe daily parking rate in the garage were $9.00, then the facility would come very close to paying for itself. . .~ 1 ~ ;;gJ iiJ I .~ Bond Financing: the primary financing vehicle for the garage would be a $2.5 million general obligation bond, with an interest rate of 4.5% and a term of 20 years. Annual debt service would be $192,000. . ~ Prudent Contingency Planning: For adequate debt coverage and to cover contingent budget items and business points, we recommend that the City identify $100,000 of additional revenues per year. We believe that an. increase in the PBIA assessment, along with an increase in the monthly permit parking fee, and off-season and/or conference center parking revenues from the garage, should be sufficient to generate the additional revenues. Site Selection: two sites were considered, the City Light parcel on Front, and the Tidelands West parcels (Capos and City-owned). We recommend that the Tidelands West parcel be selected due to. superior location and Dupar contract problems with the City Light site. Next Steps: local validation of analysis, business meetings with hotel developer, property owners and downtown associations, programmatic planning for garage facility . Parking Garage Study for Port AlIlgdes Ravenlmrst Development, mc. 10/24/02 1 0 Page 2 . . ;;:J "1 i "'" I J. I . I . DRAFT Methodology , The basic methodology used in this report to determine the financial viability of a parking structure in Port Angeles is as follows: . We created an analytical model to project the parking demand for a new garage starting from the current usage downtown. . We prepared a quick conceptual plan for the two garage alternatives, and had contractors and developers price them, to see what the project might cost. . We looked at capital sources and public financing methods, to evaluate how much funding we would need. . We then projected revenues and expenses for the structure, to determine how much of the cost could be supported by the parking revenues themselves. . Finally, we looked for ways to fund the financing shortfalls. Parking Demand and Capacity In order to determine how many customers would park in a new garage structure, we need to determine the total number of spaces needed for tourist parking,and allocate those spaces between the new garage and the existing lots. To do this, we made a couple of simplifying assumptions. . Parking lots south of Front Street are used primarily by shoppers and downtown workers, and lots north of Front Street are used primarily by tourists and visitors. This means the inventory. of visitor parking J'ots consist of the lots on Tidelands East (Heckman, Niichel and Voang) and the lots on Tidelands West (Capos, and Benson and City), along with seasonal use of the Oak Street lots (Fiddler). These lots represent 420 parking spaces at the summer peak, and 250 spaces off-season. (See right side of Table 1). . . Visitor parking demand consists of walk-on ferry customers and tourists in town but not taking the ferry. This number is adjusted to include the locals that rent monthly stalls (off-season) in the Niichel garage, and further adjusted to acknowledge that some tourists will park in hotel lots, outside the downtown core or on the street. The daily demand projection (month by month) is shown on the left side of Table 1. Table 1 illustrates the current parking situation, and the ferry customer counts reported by Barrett and Harmon match up with the lot utilization percentages provided by Heckman, so we have some confidence that the base model Is valid. Parking Ga:mge Study fol' Port Angeles Rii'Vendun'st Development, Inc. 10/24/02 11 Page 3 DRAFT -J To estimate the parking demand for the new garage, we need to make three basic adjustments to the existing parking inventory: we subtract the spaces that will be lost when the Gateway project is built, including the Oak Street lot because of the hotel construction, we subtract the surface spaces lost on the garage site, and we add back the new spaces in the proposed garage. This adjusts the capacity side of the equation, while the demand figures remain the same~ Tables 2 and 3 illustrate the parking situations based on a new garage on the Tidelands West site (Table 2) and on the City Lightsite (Table 3). Parking demand in excess of the historic utilization of the existing surface lots is assumed to go to the garage. . ~ ~ '''1 .4 ~ it In Tables 4 and 5, the parking demands for the hotel and conference center are added to the equation, and Table 5 adds the 126 motlthly stalls now being used by Dupar on the City Light lot. Because these spaces are not accounted for in our initial inventory, the lot spaces must be replaced in our model. i To summarize the tables, there are ,currently about 250 parking spaces off- season and 420 parking spaces during the summer to meet tourist/visitor parking' demand. These spaces are generally sufficient to satisfy the current needs. But the loss of spaces from Gateway and the hotel construction on Oak Street, combined with the additional demand from the hotel. and the conference center (150 spaces) will result in a shortfall of parking spaces. This shortfall translates into parking usage in the new garage, and based on this analysis, the utilization of the garage would be as follows: . '~ei !'.1!! I January 142 0 268 118 February 162 12 288 138 March 161 11 287 137 April 154 4 280 . 130 May 248 98 318 168 June 293 143 363 213 July 378 228 428 278 August 408 258 458 308 September 238 88 364 214 October 154 4 280 130 November 192 42 318 168 December 192 42 318 168 While these numbers appear large, much of the demand results from the 126 displaced Dupar spaces and the hotel. When looking for parking revenues, we should focus on the numbers inside the box- daily ferry customers in the peak season that cannot park any closer than the garage. Everyone else is either parking in the surface lots or is a local that has a low cost monthly pass today, Plu-lring Garage Study for Port Angeles Ravcnburst DeveiQiJment, Inc. 10/24/02 1 2 Page 4 . DRAFT . and is not likely to pay enough for parking to support a parking structure. Since it is assumed that the City will not provide free parking to the hotel customers, the financial arrangements will have to be negotiated with the hotel developer before the hotel and garage are built. I i -1 -1 "'1 Based on the demand analysis, we would recommend that the financial analysis be based on the following utilization scHedule: ' Month January 20 February 20 March 20 April 20 1 May 90 ~ June 140 ill July 230 ~ August 250 I September 90 October 20 November 20 December 20 Total 940 ". J ~ These are daily parking counts by month, so the total spaces used per year would be 940 x 30=28,200. (Source: Tic;lelands West site, Table 4, right hand column "Demand w/o hote!", numbers smoothed and rounded.) , Garage Location and Size We were directed to consider two potential garage locations: the southwest corner of the Tidelands West block, and' kitty corner across the intersection, the ,City Light parking lot now being used by Dupar. The Tidelands West parcel measures approximately 120 ft by 300 ft, and would , require the demolition or relocation of the Zack's tavern. Because the site is already partially excavated, the plan would be to build one parking level below grade, one at the street level, and one elevated level. In this configuration, the garage would accommodate approximately 350 stalls, of which 250 would represent an increase above the existing parking inventory. The City Light parcel measures approximately 120 ft by 500,ft. Construction of a garage would require the demolition or relocation of the old .City Light building. The garage would consist of one elevated level over an at-grade surface lot, and the site would accommodate approximately 390 parking stalls, including the . Parking Garage Study for Pm.1 Angeles Raventmrst Development, me. 10i24/02 13 Page 5 , DRAFT spaces that exist at grade today. 260 of the stalls would be additions to the parking inventory. . ~ Either garage could be designed to accommodate an additional structured parking level at a future date, at a moderate cost premium. Both sites have favorable dimensions which will allow for a cost-effective parking structure design. .:;:j 1 Although both sites are across from the Oak Street site, and'would support that property well, they are very different in their other attributes. As parking locations that would serve primarily the tourist/visitorl ferry-walk-on customer, they each have advantages and disadvantages. ~~ - i City Light Property: Advantages: . , The City already owns the property. . Construction costs per space for a garage would be slightly cheaper here. . The site supports the Oak Street development. ;tl Disadvantages: . A garage would displace the Dupar parking lot, forcing 126 leased spaces to find other parking alternatives. This might violate whatever agreement exists between Dupar and the City. . . The site is two blocks away from the ferry terminal, and relatively inconvenient for ferry parking. , . Parking revenues for ferry customers would be lower because of the inferior location. . - Tidelands West Property: Advantages: . The site is a half-block from the ferry terminal, and is very convenient for ferry customers. . Parking revenues would be higher because of the better location. . The additional parking spaces could spur development of the remainderofthe block (Railroad frontage). . With a smaller footprint and some underground spaces, the garage would have a smaller visual impact on the downtown. . The site supports the Oak Street development. Disadvantages: . The City does not own a major portion of the property, and would probably have to trade parcels. Parking Gar$.ge Study for Port Angeles ~v~Jllh1just Development, Iuc. 10/24/02 14 Page 6 . . -1 ~ ~ I I i. I ,_J ItI - . 1 d.) DRAFT . Construction costs per space are sJightly higher. . The program would require that,Zack's be moved or demolished. After discussing the sites with a number of real estate professionals, including other developers and parking lot operatqrs, it is our ,recommendation that the Tidelands West site be selected as the preferred location for a parking structure in downtown Port Angeles. In terms of parking garage size, a garage of 350 spaces could accommodate the peak summer demand as well as the hotel spaces for eleven months a year, falling 30 stalls short in August. This assumes the hotel uses 150 parking spaces. If the number is more, the size oOha garage can be increased, provided the hotel pays for the spaces it needs. Further analysis should also consider the possible overlap of uses in the garage, since walk-on trips to Victoria are typically day-trips, and hotel parking is predominantly overnight. It is possible that a third of the hotel spaces could be shared with the tourist parking without a conflict. Parking Garage Construction Costs: The best way to estimate construction costs is from a set of plans, and the more detailed the drawings, the better the cost estimate. At this stage of the project we do 'not have any drawings, so the best we, can get is a conceptual estimate based on experience. We asked(two firms to provide us with cost estimate,s, on the condition that this work did not exclude them from consideration if and when the project goes out for bid proposals. Both firms are located in Seattle and both have extensive garage construction experience, but they are very different from one another. The first is the Howard S. Wright Company. H. S. Wright is a large general , contracting firm with an excellent reputation. One of the company's specialties is designlbuild garage contracts, whereby the contractor forms a design, engineering and construction team to design and build the facility. Because the design choices ina garage are primarily technical in nature, and the cost of a garage is highly influenced by the choice of construction methods, a designlbuild team is often a very efficient way to manage the project. The second firm is the Touchstone Corporation, an office and retail development company in Seattle. They would be interested in acting as fee developer for the garage, whereby the City would contract with them, and they would assemble the design and construction team while acting as project manager for the project. Like H. S. Wright, they have extensive garage development experience, and are excellent project managers. Parking Garage Study for Pm1 Angeles Ra'Venimr~t Development, fuc.. 10/24/02 15 Page 7 DRAFT J But the selection of a project team, and the debate between hiring a contractor or a developer can wait until the more fundamental decisions are made. Today we are concerned only with the prices for constructing a garage facility. Information about the two firms, and details of the cost estimates they prepared, are included in the Appendix. In summary, this is what they said: . ~ ., H. S. Wright estimated that for the City Light site, the co~t to construct a 387 stall garage on grade plus one level is $4,928,000, or $12,75pper stall. For the Tidelands West site, the cost to construct a 348 stall garage, with one level below grade, one at grade and one above, is $4,737,000, or $13,600 per stall. These. prices do not include land purchase, sales tax, inflation or contingency, or any environmental mitigation, and should be used as only as a guide ~o evaluate the feasibility of a garage. I Touchstone came up with similar numbers, offering to deliver atumkey garage on either site for a cost between $11,500 and $13,000 per space. This estimate does include contingency, but excludes land, inflation and mitigation. ~. ~ By way of comparison, Merritt+Pardini asked a contractor for garage estimates in 2001, when the Gateway planning was still underway. Absher Construction of Puyallup, WA submitted a letter in April, 2001, indicating that a garage of similar scale and finish would cost between $11,000 and $15,000 per stall. ~ ~ In any of these cases, the prices could not be guaranteed without either a detailed program or a set of detailed drawings offered in a formalRFP process. But for the purpose of this initial scoping exercise, we should use a cost of $5.5 million for a garage that produces at least 250 new spaces for the downtown inventory, not including land. . Public Financing There are at least five sources of financing for a downtown parking garage. These are: . Revenues from the parking garage . Contributions from the hotel developer II Cash investment by the City . Municipal financing through a bond issue . Other potential sources. Unless the garage can be funded by the City from general funds, which is unlikely, the project will probably be financed with a 20-year bond issue. Tothe extent that the City or the hotel developer can contribute cash up front, the bond issue may be smaller, but repayment of the bond will depend on revenues . Pm"king Gamge Study for Port Angeles Pillvenhurst Development, Inc. 10/24/02 16 Page 8 . ~ IrJ I i i. ~ ~ . DRAFT generated by the parking garage, other downtown assessments and/or annual municipal contributions. We will examine each of these five funding sources in turn, arriving. at a potential financing structure when the sources are all combined. Revenue Potential: We do not expect that parking revenues will cover the entire cost of the facility, but the revenues should make a significant contribution to the overall financing plan. For the purpose of this discussion, we are going to use the revenues from the ferry customers and tourists only, dealing with the hotel customers and their financial contribution in another section. In a previous section, we estimated that the parking utilization of the new garage would be 28,200 parking days per year. By using a range of daily parking fees, we can estimate the annual gross revenues for the garage. We can also estimate the operating expenses, which parking operators have estimated at $2500 per month, excluding property taxes and insurance. We will use $3500 per month, or $42,000 per year for our estimates. Daily Parking Fee: Gross Annual Revenues: Annual Operating Expense: Net Annual Revenues: $5.00 $141,000.00 $42,000.00 $99,000.00 $7.00 $197,400.00 $42,000.00 $155,400.00 $9.00 $253,800.00 $42,000.00 $211,800.00 It is clear from the table that higher parking rates generate more revenues, and higher revenues will support a greater percentage of the overall development costs. A critical area for civic discussion will be the pricing structure for the garage, as the pricing will affect all of the parking operations in the downtown. Hotel Contribution: The principal beneficiary of the garage is the hotel operator on the Oak Street . ~ite. While the ferry customers generate 28,200 parking days per year, the hotel generates nearly twice that number. If the hotel uses 150 spaces per day, that translates to 54,750 spaces per year. We used the figure of 150 spaces in our analysis, but we are not entirely.sure.how much parking is being provided to the hotel. This is a function of the number of spaces required by code for the hotel and the conference center (or negotiated between the parties), less the number of spaces provided on the hotel site, and actual usage may be. less than the number required. Parking Garage Study for Port Angeles Raveninu-st Dev~loproent, Ine. 101'24/02 1 7 Page 9 DRAFT , , ~ , In any event, the hotel parking spaces must be paid for, either by the hotel operator or by the City and the community. If the hotel is to pay for the spaces, there are a number of ways in which that can be done: . The hotel could pay $15,000 per space for 150 parking spaces in the garage, which it would then "own". This amounts to ~ cash payment whEm the garage is built of $2,250,000. The hotel can recover th is cost either by absorbing the cost in the room rate, or adding a parking surcharge to their guests' bills. . The hotel could guarantee the bond repayment for those spaces allocated to the hotel, and make an annual payment equivalent to the financing cost of the spaces. If the cost is $15,000 for 150 spaces, the annual.debt repayment would be $175,000 (based on a 20 year bond at 4.5% interest). This equates to $3.16 per space per day, and is much less expensive than if the hotel were to finance its own spaces at commercial rates. This structure puts the City at some risk; as the City would be exposed to the potential failure of the hotel, and would.have to repay the-bond whether or not the hotel made its annual payment. . Acknowledging that there will be vacant parking spaces in the garage for much of the year, the City could agree to "share" some of these spaces, reducing the size of the garage and the size of the hotel contribution. By doing so, the parties will have to recognize that for three months of the year, there will be insufficient parking spaces for both the _hotel and the ferry customers, although to some eXtent, the . hotel spaces are for evening use, while the ferry spaces are used during the day. . ""'l M 1 ~.-.\ ;) I . ~ - For the purpose ofthis analysis, we will assume that the hotel contributes either cash or bond repayment for 100 of their 150 spaces. In dollar terms, the hotel will either contribute $1,500,000 to the construction of the garage, or agree to pay $115,000 per year. Cash Contribution by the City: We understand that the City has expressed a willingness to contribute the proceeds from the land sale on Tidelands East for the Gateway project to the funding for the new garage. We have estimated this amount to be $1,500,000.00 Bond Issue: We also understand that the City does have the bonding capacity to issue bonds for a project of the scale of the garage, and that the financing terms would likely be in the range of 4.25% interest with a 20-year term. For the purpose of this analysis, we have used a 4.5% rate. . Parking Garage Study for :Port Angeles Ravenhurfjt Development, mc. 10/24/02 . 1 8 Page 10 . ~ j i I i. .~ I I . DRAFT . The bond amount would be the total project cost less any capital contributions made by the City and by the hotel. The two alternative forms of hotel contributions are shown in the table below: Garage Cost: City Contribution: Hotel Contribution: Bond Proceeds: Up-front Hotel Payment $5,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $2,500,000 ' $192,000 $0 $192,000 Annual Hotel Payment $5,500,000 . $1,500,000 $0 $4,000,000 $307,000 $115,000 $192,000 Annual Repayment: Hotel Contribution: Net Annual Obligation: The revenues derived from the garage operations would underwrite portions of the annual bond obligation. Using the three parking fee levels presented in an earlier section: Daily Parking Fee: $5.00 $7.00 $9.00 Annual Bond Obligation: . -$192,000 -$192,000 -$192,000 Contribution from Garage Opns: $99,000 $155,000 $212,000 Underwriting Shortfall/Surplus: -$93,000 -$37,000 $20,000 Based on this analysis and in an ideal world, the City's financial obligations to repay the garage construction could.be fully underwritten, if: · The construction costs are $5.5 million. . The City contributes $1.5 million in cash up front. . The. City contributes the land for the project. . The hotel contributes $1.5 million in cash or debt service equivalent. . Parking fees in the garage cost $9.00 per day. . Parking utilization corresponds to the levels projected. Contingency Planning: Unfortunately, this is not a perfect world, and a number of things could go wrong. The most likely problem areas, other than the fact that this is a very preliminary and simplistic analysis, are the following: !I The project could cost more than initially estimated. Any of a number of factors could create this problem: land acquisition costs, environmental contamination on the site, inflation due to project delays, or the desire for a higher-quality facility, with retail at street level and Parking Garage Study for Port Angeles Ravenhurst Development, fuf;'9 10/24/02 I Page 11 DRAFT i ---. other embellishments. We suggest that a contingency of $500,000, or . $40,000 in annual revenues, be included in the planning. · The hotel may not be able to contribute the funding proposed in this report. Even though we are already proposing a cost subsidy (100 vs. 150 spaces), the additional $1,500,000 may be too much for the hotel I, ' pro forma.to absorb. If the hotel chooses to make annual bond.service payments instead, these may become onerous if the hotel does not perform as expected. Additional funding sources for the bond obligation outside the hotel would be prudent. ;;q "i ~"':';1 l! i · The favorable bond market terms may evaporate before the City is ready to issue the bonds. Adding 0.5% to the interest rate would increase the annual obligation by $14,000. I · Higher garage operating costs, or lower revenues, could reduce the proceeds coming from garage operations. A $20,000 swing could occur from higher security costs, or poor fee collection experience. J l:: All or any of these events could occur, and an economy in which one occurs may contribute to the probability that the others also happen. Although the most favorable model suggests that there will be sufficient revenue to payoff the bond debt, we would recommend that the City identify enough funding and revenues sources to have a $100,000 annual cushion over the projected bond repayment needs. . - Other Revenue Sources Parking has been an issue in downtown Port Angeles for many years. .It affects not only visitors to the community, but local merchants and their local customers. . Merchants belong to the parking association, which allows them to park on City lots at almost no cost, and excuses them from the obligation to provide parking on their own properties. This opportunity is not being offered to the hotel ~eveloper, nor to any other new projects proposed for the downtown. The easiest and most equitable way to generate more revenues to support the garage construction is to increase the annual PBIA association fees, and set them aside to underwrite the bond issue. Given their current levels, a doubling of the fee would not be unreasonable, and even that would only add $20,000 a year to the City coffers. Redevelopment of the downtown, with the new Gateway project, a new garage and a hotel/conference center project, would likely result in higher sales dollars in the downtown, leading to higher rents and higher property values. Downtown . P~rking Garage Study for Port Angeles Ravenbul'st DeveloDm~nt, me. 10/24/02 . 20 Page 12 '. ;j I i J. .~ . DRAFT property owners are the ultimate beneficiaries of all this activity, but they do not contribute to the PBIA. In addition to the merchant assessment, the PBIA should also collect an assessment from downtown property owners. This could also add $20,000 per year to the garage fund. The third way to add a little revenue is to increase the monthly permit parking fees from $15.00 to $25.00. This will ge'nerate an additional $12,000 per year in revenues, after the loss of spaces due to Gateway are factored in. This would have a disproportionate affect on Dupar, as they lease half of the spaces in the downtown, but it would be considerably better than losing their spaces entirely if the garage is built on the City Light site. A fourth way to raise some money is to allow developers to "sPQnsor" parking spaces in the garage. There may be circumstances where a prqperty owner. wants to add on to their existing space, or modify the use, buUhe additional parking required by code makes the addition infeasible. The City coul~ choose to grant the addition without the extra parking, provided the property owner contributed some set amount for each space waived by the City, to be applied to the cost of the garage. A similar mechanism could be used by downtown parcel owners, such as the lots on the north side of Tidelands West, to achieve higher densities on their properties using parking spaces in the garage. The garage itself has the potential to generate more revenues. Because the parking demand peaks in the summer, most ofthe parking spaces in the garage (not used bY.the hotel) will be empty for more than half the year. Income derived from these spaces was not included in the base revenue analysis, and any additional income would therefore contribute tathe contingency fund. No ' revenues have been included for parking generated by the conference center, for example, nor for off-season parking passes or special events. Beyond these five ideas, there are many other ways for the community to tax , itself, with Local Improvement Districts, area assessments, local fees and other tools. The ideal assessment vehicle would generate between $20,000 and' $30,000 per year, and would tax those who benefit from the 250 additional . parking spaces in the downtown. Next Steps: There are a number of steps that should occur once this report has been reviewed and circulated. . Have the local parking experts review and evaluate the parking demand numbers. Assess the daily parking rate figures for the garage. \II Meet with the hotel developer and determine their need for spaces, and their willingness to pay for them. . Parldng Garage Study for Port Angeles R.11venhurst Development, ms:r1 1 0/24/02 ~ Page 13 , DRAFT ~ ; . Meet with the downtown businesses and determine their willingness to adjust the PBIA assessments and parking rates. . Have the City's CFO and legal counsel reviewthe report and identify areas of concern. Confirm bond capacity and constraints. . Have preliminary discussions with the affected property owners and determine their willingness to cooperate. This includes both Capos and . Dupar. . Review the historic status, if any, ofthe Zack's building. . Start programmatic design of the parking structure, to determine whether the plan should also accommodate car shows and farmers' markets, to decide whether to include ground floor retail uses, and to evaluate the cost implications of these preferences. . Discuss and consider the alternative contracting methods - designlbuild, owner design and contractor bid, or turnkey fee development. ffl m I j .;j I Parlung Garage Study for Purt Angeies R.avenhmmt Development, Ink2 10/24/02 ~ Page 14 . . . e --, TABLES ~ I I ~e I ' ,e 23 ~& i"1"..._..,,_~_ mliWIGI[~ ~l:.g DRAFT City of Port Angeles Extended Parking Analysis, Daily Demand Forecast Month All figures expressed in daily parking spaces. Reported Utilization # Stalls % 65 10% 65 10% 90 20% 115 30% 250 50% 292 60% 399 95% 399 95% 190 60% 140 40% 90 20% 90 20% January 40 20 40 -50 50 February 60 20 40 ~50 70 March 85 20 40 -50 95 April 100 30 40 -50 120 May 185 75 40 -50 250 June 205 100 40 -50 295 .!\Dy 300 150 0 -50 400 ~ust 330 150 0 -50 430 September 190 60 40 -50 240 October 120 30 40 -50 140 November 100 20 40 -50 110 December 100 20 40 -50 110 Notes: ...lL1.J I L~._....~_,"._... TABLE 1 Pre-Gateway Heckman Ca os Niichel 250 155 45 50 250 155 45 50 250 155 45 50 250 155 45 50 420 155 80 45 140 420 155 80 45 140 420 155 80 45 140 420 155 80 45 140 250 155 45 50 250 155 45 50 250 155 45 50 250 155 45 50 Ferry walk-ons estimated by Ravenhurst based on information provided by operators. (3.0 pass/car) Non-ferry tourists includes all paying customers other than ferry Walk-ons and monthly parkers. Monthly parking is primarily within the NUchel garage. Offsite spaces incl.ude street parking, hotel parking and lots other than those catalogued above. Parking lot utilization estimates provided by Heckman. . Utilization percentages.do not include monthly spaces. Total utilization equals percentage plus monthly. Rave.t Development, Inc. report tab.21024.XIS ~002 . City of Port Angeles Extended Parking Analysis, Daily Demand Forecast JIIliIllllll ilIL._,.. . DRAFT .1.1) .L "". TA&2 UMlIlI!9 - til:.UI ,~ Tidelands West Garage Post-Gateway" All figures expressed in daily parking spaces. 40 40 40 40 40 40 o o 40 40 40 40 Reported Total Utilization Demand # Stallsl % -50 50 56 10% -50 70 56 10% -50 95 72 20% -50 120 88 30% -50 250 120 50% -50 295 136 "60% -50 400 152 \ 95% -50 430 152 95% -50 240 136 60% -50 140 104 40% -50 110 72 20% -50 110 72 20% Month Ferry Non-ferry Monthly Walk-ons Tourists Parkin January February March April May June Jul~ August September October November December Notes: 40 60 85 100 185 205 300 330 190 120 100 100 20 20 20 30 75 100 150 150 60 30 20 20 IIIr\.a~.~i\'llii~ll1:~rj!~iI..:~1~{f$~ Total Heck- Supply man Capos Niichel Benson 160 65 45 50 160 65 45 50 160 65 45 50 160 65 45 50 160 65 0 45 50 160 65 0 45 50 160 65 0 45 50 160 65 0 .- 45 50 160 65 45 50 160 65 45 50 160 65 45 50 160 65 45 . 50 Ravenhurst Development, Inc. "Garage Demand" equals "Total Demand" less""Reported #Stalls". Demand would be reduced by higher utilization of existing lot capacity. Utilization percentages do not include monthly spaces. Total utilization equals percentage plus monthly. Does not include demand from hotel/conference center. . report tables 021024.xls '. Garage Demand -6 14 23 32 130 159 248 278 104 36 38 38 10/24/2002 City of Port Angeles Extended Parking Analysis, Daily Demand Forecast. .Jm:!Y l:L. DRAFT 1&llillllllJiJ f!lli!l!:,LeJ .JUl L... City Light Garage Post-Gateway All figures expressed in daily parking spaces. Month Ferry Walk-on Jan 40 20 40 -50 126 176 Feb 60 20 40 -50 126 196 Mar 85 20 40 -50 126 221 Apr 100 30 40 -50 126 246 May 185 75 40 -50 126 376 June 205 100 40 -50 126 421 JUI~ 300 150 0 -50 126 526 Au 330 150 0 -50 126 556 Sept 190 60 40 -50 126 366 Oct 120 30 40 -50 126 266 Nov 100 20 40 -50 126 236 Dec 100 20 40 -50 126 236 Reported Utilization # Stallsl % 56 10% 56 10% 72 20% 88 30% 160 50% 184 60% 228 95% I 228 95% 136 60% 104 40% 72 20% 72 .20% Capos Niichel Benson 160 65 45 50 160 65 45 50 160 65 45 50 160 65 45 50 240 65 80 45 50 240. 65 80 - 45 50 240 65 80 45 50 240 65 80 45 50 160 65 45 50 160 65 45 50 160 65 45 50 160 65 45 50 Notes: "Garage Demand" equals "Total Demand" less "Reported #Stalls". Demand would be reduced by higher utilization of existing lot capacity. Utilization percentages do not include monthly spaces. Total utilization equals percentage plus monthly. Does not Include demand from hotel/conference center. Raven. Development, Inc. report tabl.1024.XIS TABLE 3 Garage Demand 120 140 149 158 216 237 298 328 230 162 164 164 ~ 1.002 .~.JIIiWlDl'!' 'D'L. _ ___ . . City of Port Angeles Extended Parking Analysis, Daily Demand Forecast DRAFT All figures expressed in daily parking spaces. Month Ferry Non-ferry Walk-ons Tourists Jan 40 20 40 -20 0 150 0 230 Feb 60 20 40 -20 0 150 0 250 Mar 85 20 40 -30 0 150 0 265 Apr 100 30 '40 -30 0 150 0 290 May 185 75 40 -50 0 150 0 400 June 205 100 40 -50 0 150 0 445 Jul~ 300 150 0 -70 0 150 0 530 Aug...... 330 150 0 -70 0 150 0 560 Sept 190 60 40 -50 0 150 0 390 Oct 120 30 40 -50 0 150 0 290 Nov 100 20 40 -30 0 150 0 280 Dec 100 20 40 -30 0 150 0 280 U&IIilER!J ,",e,,'.,\' U li .L.", TA.E4 Tidelands West Garage Post-Gateway DMV Estimate Reported ;111I;~l(1 Utilization Garage # Stalls! % Total Demand 88 30% 160 142 88 30% 160 162 104 40% 160 161 136 60% 160 154 152 70% 160 248 152 70% 160 293 152 95% 160 378 152 95% 160 408 152 70% 160 238 136 60% 160 154 88 -"-30% 160 192 88 30% 160 192 Notes: Offsite parking shows seasonal variation. Higher lot utilization than base model. Utilization percentages do not include ma,nthly spaces. Total utiliz.~tion equals percentage plus monthly. Capacity summarized from prior tables. Ravenhurst Development, Inc. report tables 021024.xls 81 660 hotel: Demand w/o hotel -8 12 11 4 98 143 228 258 88 4 42 42 27,660 10/24/2002 .ImIIlilI u;. .... umWlllln t~f"W"')' LvJl City of Port Angeles Extended Parking Analysis, Daily Demand Forecast DRAFT All figures expressed in daily parking spaces. .J1.1: .1..... TABLE 5 City Light Garage Post-Gateway DMV Estimate Reported Month Ferry Utilization Walk-ons # Stall % Total Jan 40 20 40 -20 126 150 0 356 88 30% 160 Feb 60 20 40 -20 126 150 0 376 88 30% 160 Mar 85 20 40 -30 126 150 0 391 104 40% 160 Apr 100 30 40 -30 126 150 0 416 136 60% 160 May 185 75 40 -50 126 150 0 526 208 70% 240 June 205 100 40 -50 126 150 0 571 .208 70% 240 Jul~ 300 150 0 -70 126 150 0 656 228 95% 240 Aug 330 150 0 -70 126 150 0 686 228 95% 240 Sept 190 60 40 -50 126 150 0 516 152 70% 160 Oct 120 30 40 -50 126 150 0 416 136 60% 160 Nov 100 20 40 -30 126 150 0 406 88 30%" 160 Dec 100 20 40 -30 126 150 0 406 88 30% 160 Notes: Offsite parking shows seasonal variation. Higher lot utilization than base model. Utilization percentages do not include monthly spaces. Totalutilization equals percentage plus monthly. Capacity summarized from prior tables. . ear: ear,excludin hotel: Raven.t Development, Inc~ report tables 021024.xls . Garage Demand 268 288 287 280 318 363 428 458 364 280 318 318 119 1 00 Demand w/o hotel 118 138 137 130 168 213 278 308 214 130 168 . 168 65 100 1.2002 . -l ;j l , APPENDIX Contractor Pricing Developer Interest Letter I i J. is ~ . 29 1-/54/ / :'. . ~ Howard S. Wright "1:1 Construction Co. 501 Eastlake Avenue E, Suite 100 (98109-5451) PO Box 3764, Seattle, WA 98124.2264 USA -1 206-447-7654 phone 206-447-7727 fax . ~ II' ~ www.howardswright.com September 24, 2002 Mr. Darrell M. Vange Ravenhurst Development, Inc. 1411 Fourth Ave., Suite 1322 Seattle, W A q ~I 0 I '1 i Re: City of Port Angeles Parking Garage I Dear Darrell: Please find attached Rough Order Magnitude (ROM) estimates for the proposed Port Angeles Parking Garage for each of the two proposed siteS. Also included are conceptual structural plans on which the estimates are based. -' I Please keep us advised of the progress on this project. We would like to build it. If you have any questions about these budget estimates, please call David Craig at (206) 4:47- 7634. . I. , Sincerely, HOWARD S. WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION CO. Bob J oh sen Regional Operations Manager Cc: Marshall Cutting David Craig . 30 ~eattle . portland . sacramento r . . san rranclsco . 105 angeles . phoenix 1150 Z . ~ . Howard S. Wright Construction .Co. Conceptual Budget Estimate Study Ravenhurst Development, Inc. Port Angeles Parking Structures City Light Pad Parking Garage 9/23/2002 L: , OPS , Sea" Est' Proj , Port Angeles' ROM Estimate (09-23-'12) . ; ! --; PROJECT NAME: 4 ESTIMATE DATE: ESTIMATE FILE: IROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE (ROM) ESTIMATE #1 BUILDING AREA SUMMARY: A. Site Area B. Parking Structure 'J ~ m C. Plaza Construction: D. Interior f Ancillary Construction Retail Space . Office Space Misc. Space I Parking Efficiency (SFfStall): I 70,0001 sf 120,000 sf olsf . 38715talls (shown - self parl<) 310 SFIStall Total Office 1 Retail GEBA Area I . Total Parking+Office+Retall GEBA Area I.. o sf o sf o sf .O.IGEBA .120,000 Isf i DOCUMENT BASIS: Ravenhurst Development. Inc. - 8115102 Budget Request Letter . INCLUSIONS: Mar1<-up's Design Services Preconstruction Services Construction Costs J. EXCLUSIONS: Price escalation. Budget pricing based on current marl<et pricing. Off-site mitigation costs. Master Use or Conditional Use Permits; EIS's; Traffic Studies; Entitiement Costs WSST Testing & Inspection Penn/ts, LID's, and or other fees required by governing authorities. Utility connection fees (water, sewer, storm, gas, & power). Off-site worl<, Induding street improvements and traffic signalization. Builder's risk Insurance. Bond on General Contrador's work. Hazardous materials identification, handling, abatement & disposal. Demolition, removal, repair or drilling through any underground strudures, utilities, concrete, rock. or other unsuitable bearing materia/. Contingency (10% recommended) . .~ QUALlFICA nONS: Par1<ing Garage Construction - Cast in place post-tensioned reinforced concrete frame SCHEDULE: Preconstruction period commencing 06124102 - 7101103 (12 month duration allowed). Assumes construction start late Summer 2003 (12 month projed duration).. ROM ESTIMATE DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT U.P. COST REMARKS $0 A. SITEWORK (DEMO, UnL'S. SHORING, MASS EW): 70.000 SF $0 $0 Existing Building Demolition . $0 -Building demolition EXCl $0 -CuVcap utilities, mise demo support worl< EXCl $0 $0 Storm Water Detention & Site Utiilities 1 AllW 75,000.00 $75,000 $0 . Off-site 1 Right of Way Work: $0 -ROW curbing & street patching 1.280 LF 40.00 $51,200 Port Angeles PG'MM Estimate (9-23-{)2).xIs Page 3 .~ '4 '1 I I , ..i ;;! I J-htA.J 3 ROM ESTIMATE DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT U.P. COST REMARKS . $0 -ROW sidewalks 10,240 SF 3.50 $35,840 -ROW sidewalks - special finish 0 SF 7.00 $0 -ROW curb alts 960 SF 6.00 $5,760 -Street Trees, Grates, Frames 43 EA 2,000.00 $85,333 - T raffle Signalization I Channelization' Streellmprovements EXCL $0 $0 Landscaping & Irrigation 10,000 SF 8.00 $80,000 $0 Shoring: , $0 -Temporary Shoring EXCL 35.00 $0 I. $0 Total Permanent Shoring Wall Area 0 SF $0 Mass Earthwork: $0 .Temporary Ramping, Erosion Control, Wheel-wash, ele. 1 LS 10,000.00 $10,000 . Temporary Dewatering 1 ALLW 15,000.00 $15,000 .Ground water treatment' sediment filtration 1 EXCL $0 -Mass Excavation & Off-site Disposal (60,000 x 5' ave depth of excav.) 11,111 BY 13.00 $144,444 -Overexcavation (allow 12") 2,222 BY 13.00 $28,889 -Mass Fill - Overexcavation (allow 12") 2,222 BY 20.00 $44,444 . Trim Face of Shoring Support 0 'SF 1.70 $0 -Mise EarthworklMass Backfill 1 LS 10,000.00 $10,000 $0 Sitework Sublotal $585,911 General Conditions 585,911 $ 0.075 $43,943 Sltework Total 120,000 SF '$629;854: ..;..... ...... "$5.2$' $0 B. Parking Structure (3 Levels, 348 Stalls): 120,000 SF $0 -Foundation Piling 120,000 SF 2.00 $240,000 -Foundations, slructure, stairs, mise 120,000 SF 1.50 $180,000 .Parking Structure 120,000 SF 17.00 $2,040,000 -Perimeter Endosure (precast spandrel panels & attachment alrb) 1,860 RLF 165.00 $306,900 -Ramp Barrier Cable (S-strand wire rope) 420 RLF 18.00 $7.560 .Stair Towers' Stairs (uncovered) 2 EA 50.000.00 $100,000 -Elevator Shaft 1 . EA 5O.ooo~00 $50.000 -Caulking. waterproofing (pits. below grade walls) 1 ALLW 25.000.00 $25.000 . -Mise. Finishes 120,000 SF 1.00 $120.000 -Specialties 120,000 SF 0.20 $24.000 -Elevators 2 EA 45,000.00 $90.000 -Fire Protection 120,000 SF 1.00 $120,000 -Plumbing 120.000 SF 0.75 $90.000 -HVAC 120,000 EXCL $0 -Electrical 120.000 SF 2.00 $240,000 Temporary power - equipment' distribution 120,000 SF 0.25 $30,000 $0 Parking Garage Subtotal $3,663,460 General Conditions 3,663,460 $ 0.075 $274,760 Parking Garage Total 120.000 SF .. '. .....$3.9~~2Qi :$32.82: .. G. Design & Preconstruction Services: .$0 -Civil 1 ALLW 50,000.00 $50,000 -Soils 1 ALLW 15.000.00 $15,000 -Slrudural 120,000 ALLW 1.00 $120.000 -Architedural 1 ALLW 75,000.00 $75,000 -Landscape 1 ALLW 25.000.00 $25.000 -Mechanical' Electrical (bidder-design criteria packages) 120.000 ALLW 0.25 $30,000 .Preconslruction Services (1 person staff, 1.5 dIwk average, 50 weeks) 600 HRS 75.00 $45,000 Preconstruetion Services Budget Total .' : ....:...$3llO;oQl:l. . . . ... $3.00 Total $ (Sltework + P. Garage + Design' Pn:const Svcs) . . $4.!l2!lil!7.... .$41.07 , 387 Stalls :.;:"'$12;7~Q,8.6) $/Stall q 120,000 SF '\$41 ,liT;: $/SF . . . Port Angeles PG32M Estimate (9-23-02).xls Page 4 ijs c;u 1- ( . ~ Howard S. Wright .:I Construction Co. Conceptual Budget Estimate Study Ravenhurst Development, Inc. Port Angeles Parking Structures Tidelands West Parking Garage 9/23/2002 l: \ OPS \ S~a \ Est \ Proj \ Port Angeles \ ROM Estimate (09-23-02) PROJECT NAME: .~ ~ "'1 ESTIMATE DATE: ESTIMATE FILE: IROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE (ROM) ESTIMATE #1 BUILDING AREA SUMMARY: A. Site Area B. Parking Structure C. Plaza Construction: D. Interior / Ancillary Construction Retail Space Office Space Misc. Space I Parking Efficiency (SF/Stall): I A3;500/Sf . . 108;000 sf . Olsf 348 Is. tails (shown "self park) 310 SF/Stall . 'J ~. i"- :;:i Total Office / Retail GEBA Areal. Total Parklng+Office+Retail GEBAAreal o sf o sf o sf O-lGEBA '108,OOo.lsf I DOCUMENT BASIS: Ravenhurst Development, Inc. - 8115/02 Budget Request Leiter INCLUSIONS: Mark-up's Design Services Preconstruction Services Construction Costs ~ EXCLUSIONS: Price escalation. Budget pricing based on current market pricing. Off-site mitigation costs. Master Use or Conditional Use Permits; EIS's; Traffic Studies; Entitlement Costs WSST Testing & Inspection Permits, LID's, and or other fees required by goveming authorities. Utility cOnnection fees (water, sewer, storm, gas, & power). Off-site work, including street improvements and traffIC signalization. Builder's risk insurance. Bon~ on General Contrador's work. Hazardous materials identification, handling, abatement & disposal. Demolition, removal, repair or drilling through any underground strudures, utilities, concrete, rock, or other unsuitable bearing material. Contingency (10% recommended) J. QUALIFICATIONS: Parking Garage Construdlon - Cast in place post-tensioned reinforced concrete frame ", SCHEDULE: Preconstructlon period commencing 06/24102 - 7/01/03 (12 month duration allowed); Assumes construction start late Summer 2003 (12 month projed duration). ROM ESTIMATE DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT U.P. COST REMARKS $0 A. SITEWORK (DEMO, UTIL'S, SHORING, MASS EW): 43,500 SF $0 $0 Existing Building Demolition $0 -Building demolition EXCL $0 -Cut/cap utilities, misc demo support work EXCL $0 $0 Storm Water Detention & Site Utiilltles 1 ALLW 75,000.00 $75,000 $0 Off-site I Right of Way Work: $0 -ROW curbing & street patching 890 LF 40.00 $35,600 . -ROW sidewalks 7,120 SF 3.50 $24,920 -ROW sidewalks - special finish 0 SF 7.00 $0 -ROW curb cuts 960 SF 6.00 $5,760 -Street Trees, Grates, Frames 30 EA 2,000.00 $59,333 -TraffIC Signalization / Channelization / Street Improvements EXCL $0 Port Angeles PG,33M Estimate (9-23-02).xls Page 1 Iz's' aJ .5 ROM ESTIMATE DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT U.P. COST REMARKS $0 $0 Landscaping & Irrigation 7.500 SF 8.00 $60,000 $0 Shoring: $0 -Temporary Shoring EXCL 35.00 $0 $0 ....j Total Permanent Shoring Wall Area 0 SF $0 Mass Earthwork: $0 -Temporary Ramping, Erosion Control, Wheel-wash, etc. 1 LS 10,000.00 $10,000 .~ -Temporary Dewatering 1 ALLW 15,000.00 $15,000 -Ground water treatment I sediment filtration 1 EXCL $0 -Mass Excavation & Qff-sne Disposal (36,000 x 15' aye depth of excav.) 20,000 BY 13.00 $260,000 -Overexcavation (allow 12") 1,333 BY 13.00 $17,329 -Mass FiII- Overexcavation (allow 12") 1,333 BY 20.00 $26,660 -Trim Face of Shoring Support 0 SF 1.70 $0 -Mise EarthworklMass Backfill 1 LS 10,000.00 $10,000 $0 Snework Subtotal $599,602 General Condnions 599,602 $ 0.075 $44,970 Sltework Total 108,000 SF $644,573 $5.97,' $0 B. Parking Structure (3 Levels, 348 Stalls): 108,000 SF $0 "I -Foundation Piling 108,000 SF 2.00 $216,000 I -Foundali.ons, structure, stairs, mise 108,000 SF 1.50 $162,000 -Par1<ing Strudure 108,000 SF 17.00 $1,836,000 -Perimeter Enclosure (precast spandrel panels & attachment curb) 2,100 RLF 165.00 $346,500 -Ramp Barrier Cable (S-strand wire rope) 780 RLF 18.00 $14,040 ~ .Stair Towers I S~irs (uncovered) 2 EA 75.000.00 $150,000 I -Elevator Shall 1 EA 75,000.00 $75,000 -Caulking, waterproofing (pns, below grade walls) 1 ALLW 25,000.00 $25,000 -Mise. Finishes 108,000 SF 1.00 $108,000 -Specialties 108,000 SF 0.20 $21,600 -Elevators 2 EA 50,000.00 $100,000 -Fire Protection 108,000 SF 1.00 $108,000 -Plumbing 108,000 SF 0.75 $81,000 -HVAC 108,000 EXCL $0 -Electrical 108,000 SF 2.00 $216,000. , Temporary power - equipment I distribution 108,000 SF 0.25 $27,000 -.i $0 ;,il Parking Garage Subtotal . $3,486,140 General Conditions 3,486,140 $ 0.075 $261,461. I Parking Garage Total 108,000 SF $3,747,601 $34;Ztl;; G. Design & Preconstruction Services: $0 -CMI 1 ALLW 50,000.00 $50,000 -Soils 1 ALLW 15,000.00 $15,000 -Structural 108,000 ALLW 1.00 $108,000 -Architectural 1 ALLW 75,000.00 $75,000 -Landscape 1 ALLW 25,000.00 $25,000 -Mechanical/ Electrical (bidder-design criteria packages) 108,000 ALLW 0.25 $27,000 -Preconstrudion Services (1 person staff, 1.5 dIwk average, 50 weeks) 600 HRS 75.00 $45,000 Preconstruction Services Budget Total . $345,000 '$3.19.\ Total $ (Sltework + P. Garage + Design I Preconst Svcs) $4;737,173 :..~.~!ii 348 Stalls . $1.3,~97.44 $/Stall 108,000 SF $43.86. $/SF . Port Angeles Pc:3.40M Estimate (9-23-02).xls Page 2 1--- Hr'1<-~b-~I1~l ~1:I: ~ JI ,/ <. . ... Man P.O. Boll 280 "l PU)'iIIIup WA 98371 5tr~ 1001 Shaw Road PuyBflup WA 98372 T~ 253.845.954' Fa 253.841.0925 __.AlItMtflW.~ CC01.ABSH€C345PS .." '" I i i. .J l1 I ~ \' . ~ . \0:-' ,< ~ \k' f \~. \f . ~~~ ~q~ ~~~~ r.~~/~~ ~~s;:'m ABSHER CONSTRUCTION COMmNY ~I April 26, 2001 Post-I" Fax Note 7671 T~ UII<E MEAl:)(>iA.}S CD.JDept. HER&rrr+ ~ PhOl18 . Dato From Merritt + Pardini 1000 Lenora street, suite 223 Seattle, WA 98121 Fp' . ~Z2. 94f42- Fax' Attn: Mr. Mike Meadows Re: Port Angeles Transit Center Preliminary BLidget Cost for Parking Garage Dear Mr. Mike: Thank you for the oppOrtunity to provide you with some assistance in determining preliminary budget costs for the above referenced projectM you are aware, there are many variables that determine the cost of any building or structure and although buildings may be very similar, each is also unique. Our understanding of the Initial project information Is for the construction of a two-level, 2C>O-stall parking structure located in Port'Angeles, Washington, in a tidal flat area. It would be reasonable to assume that this location would require a pile foundation to support the structure. Additionally, the capacity for future expansion of a third floor convention center is also desired. . . A careful study and review of the historical cost information Absher Construction has accumulated for parking garage construction allows us to present the following costs as preliminary budget ranges that could reasonaby be anticipated for a project of this type. A parklng garage, like any building, can be as plain or as extravagant as an Architect can design. A two-hundred stall parking garage with an economlcalleveJ of design would have an anticipated cost of approximately $2,1.00,000 to $2,300,000. The same size garage with a higher level of design meant to blend more aesthetically into a community would have an anticipated cost of approximately $2.800,000 to $3,100,000. Finally, parking garages with a level of design consistent with making the exterior face of the garage appear,as a abuilding" would have an anticipated cost $3.600,000 to 3,900,000. The above costs take into account a pile foundation system and the capacity to add a future third-level convention center. One variable that always has significant effect on any project's costs are the site it is built on. The above costs reflect a site used to maximum efficiericy with the parking garage on it, with all levels above grade. In other words, the structure takes up most of the site with a small amount of landscaping and hardscaping close to the structure, as we have found to be typical of most parking garages. Additionally, a parking garage that is only two levels does not take advantage of the economies of scale that can significantly reduce the cost per stall of any parking structure. 35 .r ' -4 ~ .~ ~ Ii i ~ I nl " c..U c..Ut:J.L 1:JU--.JO. / ~~s~m ABSHER.CONSTRUC11ON CO~ Merritt + Pardini Mr. Mike Meadows April 25, 2001 Page 2 '--'-' 'J-r.... As you are aware, Absher tlas extel'lSiv~ experience in both participating in the design phase and constructing parking structures. We would be happy to discuss offering our Preconstruotion Services In a more defined role on this project as it evolves to a point were they wish to move forward. . . uc..'.t::Jc... ~z.. . < Again. we appreciate the opportunity to provide this information to you. Please contact us if you have any questions, or clarifications. " Best regards,. . ABSHER~. .p.AN'f ~.. Tracy L Cutler __ Estimator . ~---... ". 00: File 36 . . TOTAL P.02 I 701 OJ] e TOUCHSTONE CORPORATION September 20, 2002 ~ Darrell M. Vange Ravenhurst Development 1411 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1322 Seattle, W A 98101 Re: Port Angeles Parking Garage Dear Darrell: ""'~ , I Douglas and I appreciate the opportunity to discuss building a 400 car parking structure for the City of Port Angeles. i We have assembled an experienced team capable of delivering a quality product at.the best price . possible in the market today. Touchstone would be able to deliver a turn-key guaranteed price.' We have enclosed some representative pictures of similar projects for your reference. Je Iii Among the factors that would determine the cost of a structure would be the program. and code requirements. What would be the mix of space sizes? All full size or a large percentage of compact. Other factors would be the level of architectural detail, ground level, retail and foundation requirements would all effect the final price. I I Our initial estimate for a turn-key garage would be between $11,500 and $13,000 all-in complete. Excluded from this' initial estimate are City permits, utility and connection fees, payment and performance bonds, site remediation or abatement costs and financing costs. It is assumed that the Cities funding source would cover the approximately six month construction period. From ,~ design and constructability standpoint, both of your sites have some advantages. Since one site is excavated, it would potentially have one below grade level. The paved site may have some 'cost advantages. Proximity to the ferry terminal should also be considered. The City should preference one site over the other. We would like to have the opportunity to develop a more detailed proposal and estimate for the City. .. e would also be available to meet with you and the City to more fully discuss this project. 37 2025 First Avenue, Suite 790, Seattle, Washington 98121 206.727.2393 Fax: 206.727.2399 www.touchstonecorp.com "j ~ I ~~~. ";C-.~-I ' " I ! i I I I I i I ~ ~ I , I I I ..A" l!BL.._ :mlIl!JI!If~ ~~J .....,,,,!\illl l.:~'~..~~--'---~~j--~~---:;---~_.~ I', _.~~~=_.~~ TC- 4- . I I . I i en : Jil: I I' rn , ~ ~ ! , , I .J I I ; i i . I ;' I I . - I I ! I i j -j "" ., I ~ I i /& k ! j .c 1:: o Z ... G>> CIl C ::s en . -J ; I I ; il . - . . -i ~ I I i. ~ ~ . en :I a. E ca U " CIJ .. ca u o ... . o U - a; .c .. o aI. ;: ~ ~ C::::'_ _':.::::::::.:_-:-.=::::::::..:.- -----=-=-=--_,. ~~:..~;=c-.=c7"'=';;;"'--'--_---=O'.''''_-=_<'_~''' itilr- . . ","clll'll.11i!II} J"JlliJlI[!ll!l~ '...-nl1: .~s-- ':cr:l .- ~~ i I;' I" i 1 j i I I I I i :f~1 . f:2~~1 ~)) ;[~:~ j I 00 ! ~ ~ fi 1\ ~\ Ii ):~;,~t "" ,,' ,\~ ~,' '" .<;, "\ t ~.:\,'\\\ ...~...... ~<\. ~';;\ ! .. .. ., ." c, u ,<':' 'C I . :1.: l....~~\t~'<>i;i..'i; :,;y\!" ~ ',:...",~ ;-,: ,\ ""''li~\,> 'I i;~:il~ : \. ..... ."",,' "~ :\:'~ >::,,:>,:\'~,:~,!, ;t;~;~~)~~j ,.". " \. " ' . I \'~;S~;~": ,,,.:.:. ,I ~,.'~~':::~ :':,\ \\'1 {{' 11.,\; \'. 5\ "'. .1 i I ~ I ii I ! i I I I I i ~ ! ...' r '<;f IC"j);.: I ~-';- "'; 1:;- /.... j ...: ...., I ,:: I I ! ! ~', ~ ~ ; ;.1 -~- - ~~~~~.a . cifJ Ir~~' ~ . ~~ . . ;.\J H ~ " :\ A~ ~v D 1= ~~ '":... ---,t f1fn. f1lf/r; \\~f- (JW;.,. D - ---' f--- 0 . 1- ~Q~~ ~ /"; DQ~ ~~ ({ rC.~"b ~ - .. VI 0 ~. ~\:: -;,~. f-'"1 . .-- u,~ ~ 0'" ~j c:: ~ ~ . ,~ ~ - , I - , .- ^ .~ t ~ .~ , , ~ { ~ . ~ ~ ~ , - l T, II I Ir - - 1r c . '- . . - . ~. ... f ~ - ( I T( \( L . " - I ~.. .~-. ;,g"f:J. ..r,:~. i - .~ -- I . ...- ~~.: . . '';> "'i . .4 . . ~. .. . . . . . ,.- .. -J[:(f''({ . . 4 .,...;-:1-- . . . . 1 ~. . . . / ....~ :. ;.. . . . . . .,. u. .. . . I <)'^--. ~~ "^^ r ( 1 .Oo.n.. ~ p {:~ .. ,Po. . - -~ ~. ". c "llYh .~ : , ~" :~ ..~~,~ , . o<>~f;;:' .0 ( ( I ~~, r ~ oir#--; ~ ...... '" ,( 1- " I 1\' . o~~. 'rl ell . i C.{'+-{bl t I I( l- \ T 1-. <<:- T ( l f V A , I 0 lot . , .~ I ..(~' ~ Hi .::--, /I(. ~ F~ J ~~.~ ~ ~ . 46 . . . ~ORT.ANGELES WASHINGTON U. S. A. C I T Y C 0 U N C I Lc' M E M 0 DATE: November 19,2002 To: FROM: SUBJECT: Design Services for Oil Handling and Warehouse Building, Project 21-21 Summary: Proposals were requested from six engineering/architectural consulting firms for the design of a building for handling PCB contaminated oils and additional warehous~ space. Only one of those firms, Parametrix, Inc., responded with a proposal. The proposal has been reviewed and it has been determined that Parametrix, Inc. is highly qualified for the work requested. . Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Parametrix, Inc. for engineering/architectural design services at a cost not to exceed $25,900 and the City Manager to sign amendments to the agreement in an amount not to exceed 20% of the orif!inal contract amount. Background/Analysis: EP A Regulation 40 CFR Part 761.65 requires any leaking or weeping transformers or drums of liquid to be stored under cover and out of the weather. The City does not have sufficient indoor storage space to hold the number of transformers and oil filled equipment routinely in storage. The City has numerous large oil filled units subject to being retro filled and reclassified as non PCB. These units can be retro filled and reclassified for only the cost of the oil plus labor and oil disposal in the new facility. The City will have the opportunity to experience significant savings by doing this work in house, and the potential of fines and citations will be reduced if not eliminated. . The Request for Proposals was sent to six engineering/architectural consulting firms.on the . Consultants' Roster. Only one, Parametrix, Inc., submitted a proposal. Their proposal was reviewed and their qualifications and experience are excellent. Staff has negotiated the final scope of work (attached) with a not to exceed cost of$25,900. The 2002 budget includes $60,000 for construction of this project. Requirements for this type of building are more stringent than first anticipated, therefore, the expected cost of the building has increased to approximately $120,000 (design $26,000 and construction $95,000). This requires a budgetary increase of $60,000. Budget documents will be revised to reflect this change: $10,000 in 2002 and $110,000 in 2003. 47 November 19,2002 City Council Re: Design Services for Oil Handling and Warehouse Building Page 2 Staff has explored other possible options for meeting EP A requirements. The possibility of Clallam PUD processing City transformers on a contract basis was reviewed. The PUD facility has limited space and would frequently be unable to accept City equipment. Tacoma has the next closest facility which would always be available. However, this would require processing a hazardous material transport manifest and transporting transformers by truck to Tacoma one or more times a week. This would expose the City to the added liability of a spill during transit. It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor to sign a design agreement with Parametrix, Inc. of Sumner, WAin an amount not to exceed $25,900 and the City Manager to sign amendments to the agreement in an amount not to exceed ~O% of the original contract amount. ' The UAC has reviewed this project at their November 12,2002 meeting and supported the recommendation. Attachments: Scope of Work N :\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\OiIHandling& W arehouseBldg. wpd 48 . . . . . . CITY OF PORT ANGELES PROJECT NO. 21-21 ELECTRIC UTILITY OIL HANDLING AND WAREHOUSE BUILDING DESIGN SERVICES EXHIBIT A Scope of Work BACKGROUND . . This Scope of Work identifies the work to be conducted by the Parametrix team [Parametrix, Inc., Lindberg Smith Architects (LSA), and Northwest Territories,' Inc. (NTD], herein referred to as the Consultant, for the City of Port Angeles (City) on the Electric Utility Oil Handling and Warehouse Building Design Services project. This project includes the specific-tasks described below. The project description is provided as Attachment 1. TASK DESCRIPTIONS Task 1 Preliminary (50 Percent) Design and Workshop Goal: This element of work will provide for preliminary design services needed to develop 50 percent design level plans. . Activities: Specific components of the work include: . Consultant will determine project design criteria by coordinating with the City, reviewing applicable codes and regulations. . Consultant will prepare a 50 percent design level site plan and develop sketch mockups of other plan sheets. . Consultant will meet with City staff to review 50 percent design level plans and obtain City comments. . Consultant will complete a final survey to determine the exact building corner ground elevations and to an established project benchmark for construction. . Consultant to perform monthly invoicing, project management, cost control, schedule maintenance, scope development, and routine client communications necessary to deliver project elements of work in accordance with scope, budget, and schedule requirements. DeJiverables: Parametrix anticipates the following work products for this task: . Brief technical memorandum documenting project design criteria. . Draft 50 percent design level site plan and sketch mockups of other plan sheets. City of Port Angeles Oil Handling and Warehouse Building Scope of Work 215-2191-804 (0J/01) September 2002 J 49 Assumptions: The Scope of Work and cost estimate are based on the project description listed in Attachment.1 and the following assumptions: . . The City's existing site map will be used for the project base map. It is agreed by the City that the City's site map adequately identifies site features, topography, and utilities. . The City concurs no additional geotechnical investigation is necessary and acknowledges possible presence of unsuitable soils in proposed location of building. . The City concurs that the building electrical classification is "unclassified." . The City will coordinate with utilities and provide applicable requirements. . One site visit/meeting with City by project manager only. . The site has no contaminated soil requiring testing or special consideration during design and/or construction. Cost: Parametrix will complete Task I services for $8,500. Task 2 ~inal (90 and 100 Percent) Design Goal: This element of work will provide for final design services needed to develop 90 and 100 percent design level plans, specifications, and cost estimate. . Activities: Specific components of the work include: . Develop 90 percent bid package, including plans and specifications, and submit to City for review and comment. . Incorporate the City's comments and produce final bid package. . Complete cost estimate. . Consultant to perform monthly invoicing, project management, cost control, schedule maintenance, scope development, and routine client communications necessary to deliver project elements of work in accordance with scope, budget, and schedule requirements. DeJiverables: Parametrix anticipates the following work products for this task: . Draft final (90 percent) bid package, with plans and specifications. . Final (100 percent) bid package, with construction plans and specifications. City of Port Angeles Oil Handling and Warehouse Building Scope of Work 2 215-2191-804 (01/01) September 2002 . 50 . . . . Engineer's estimate of cost for project construction cost. . Scope of Work and cost for specialty construction testing (i.e., materials, compaction, asphalt, concrete, etc.), which wIll be completed as part of Task 6 (Construction Management). Assumptions: The Scope of Work and cost estimate are based on the project descriptiQn listed in Attachment 1 and the following assumptions: . One site visit/meeting with City by project manager only. . Specifications will be provided as notes on drawings, except the initial building specification will be provided separately in CSI format. . The City will provide appropriate "front-end" bid documents, including instructions to bidders, bond forms, contract, special conditions, and other items. The City will also provide "Division 1" specifications. . Consultant will provide City with two bound copies of design documents and one original unbound copy suitable for reproduction. Mylar plan sheets will not be provided. . . Construction management and observation are not included under this scope element. . The following plan sheets will be prepared: ~ General G-l Title G-2 General Notes and Specifications (Civil, Electrical, and Structural) ~ Civil C-l Site Arrangement, Utility, Grading, and Paving Plan ~ Architectural A-I General Building Arrangement/Floor Plan A-2 Elevations/Sections/Restroom Details ~ Structural S-1 Foundation Plan and Sections ~ Electrical E-I Electrical Plan Cost: Parametrix will complete Task 2 services for $14,800. City of Port Angeles Oil Handling and Warehouse Building Scope of Work 215-2191-804 (OJ/Ol) September 2002 3 51 Task 3 Permitting . Goal: The Consultant will identify permits required for the project. Activities: Specific components of the work include: I, ' . Coordinate with City and other government agencIes to determine permitting requirements. Deliver abIes: Parametrix anticipates the following work products for this task: . Letter identifying permit and governing agency, if any are identified. . Scope, cost, and schedule for preparing permit applications and permitting documents in the event any permits or approvals are determined to be required. Assumptions: The Scope of Work and cost estimate are based on the following assumptions: . The City and the Consultant understand that no SEP A checklist or stormwater permit will be required and no EP A or Ecology or Health Department approvals or reviews are required. No permits or approvals of any kind are anticipated to be required. . The project approach is for the construction contractor to obtain the building permit. . The City and the Consultant will negotiate scope, cost, and schedule for completing . any permit applications or documents. Cost: Parametrix will complete Task 3 services for $500. Task 4 Bidding Assistance Goal: The Consultant will assist the City during the bidding process. Activities: Specific components of the work include: . Attend a prebid conference at the site (project architect only). . Respond to contractor's questions and prepare an addendum if required to clarify project bid documents. . Review bids received and make a recommendation for award. Deliverables: Parametrix anticipates the following work products for this task: . One addendum to clarify project bid documents. City of Port Angeles Oil Handling and Warehouse Building Scope of Work 4 2/5-2/9/-804 (OJ/O/) September 2002 . 52 . . . Assumptions: The Scope of Work and cost estimate are based on the following assumptions: Cost: Task 5 . Prebid meeting minutes will be prepared by the City. . The City will issue all documents and pay for copying as required for distribution of bid documents to contractors. Parametrix will complete Task 4 services for $2,100. Construction Management Based on timing of project award and the contractor's proposed schedule, Consultant will negotiate a scope of work and budget with the City for providing construction oversight, including specialty " construction testing (i.e., materials, compaction, asphalt, concrete, field welding, etc.), as required based on the construction testing program developed as part of Task 3. City of Port Angeles Oil Handling and Warehouse Building Scope of Work 5 53 215-2191-804 (01/01) September 2002 . . . 54 IH- . . ~. ~ORTANGELES WASHINGTON U. S. A. C IT Y C 0 U N 'C I L M E M 0 DATE: November 19,2002 To: MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities J)""u FROM: SUBJECT: Replacement of Emergency Generator for Wastewater Pump Stations Summary: The emergency generator for the wastewater pump stations is no longer operable and needs to be repaired or replaced. Various options have been reviewed and it has been determined that purchasing a new generator through the State Bid is the best value. Recommendation: Authorize the Director of Public Works and Utilities to proceed with purchasing a new 60 kW generator from the State Bid in an amount notto exceed $20,200 Ius 10% contin enc for ossible rice fluctuation. Background/Analysis: The City Wastewater Utility currently has a 50 kW generator that is used as an emergency power source for the wastewater pumping stations in case of a power - outage. In 1993 the City purchased a used 50kW generator (1973 model), and trailer (1989 model). The complete set was purchased from another utility and cost $11,132. Over the years the unit has served the City well as an emergency power source. The unit is no longer operable and needs to be repaired or replaced. Various options have been reviewed, including repairing or replacing the unit. The cost to repair the unit is in excess of $30,000 because it is obsolete and repair parts are not readily available. The best value option is to purchase a new 60 kW generator from the State Bid for a total of $20,200 including tax. In an effort to reduce costs by $6,000 the existing trailer, transformers, and receptacle plugs with the leads from the existing generator will be re-utilized. These components are in good condition. Procuring from the State Bid will save time and the effort needed to develop specifications and bid a new unit. Delivery time for the generator is 8 weeks. A 50 kW unit is not available on State Bid. Contact with vendors indicates only a small savings of approximately $1,000 if the 50 kW unit was purchased. Also, the lead time would be greater due to the effort of developing specifications and soliciting prices. The larger unit also provides for greater flexibility for the future. There is $7,500 accumulated in the Equipment Services Replacement Fund for a portion of this purchase. The balance of the funds required will come from wastewater reserves. The UAC at their meeting of November 12, 2002 reviewed the information and recommended approval of the purchase of the 60kW generator utilizing the State Bid. N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\GeneratorReplacementWW.wpd 55 e ,e e 56 . DATE: To: FROM: SUBJECT: ~ORTANGELES WASHINGTON CITY COUNCIL MEMO U. S.A. November 19,2002 MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilitiest)trt...- Transmission Rate Case Settlement Summarv: The Bonneville Power AdministrationTransmission Business Line (TBL) has proposed a settlement that would avoid a formal transmission rate case. This settlement inchides an increase to the City's transmission rates of about 2.5% over the two year rate period beginning October 1, 2003. Recommendation: Authorize the Director of Public Works and Utilities to sign the settlement agreement with the Bonneville Power Administration Transmission Business Line. . Back2round / Analvsis: Bonneville's Transmission Business Line (TBL) has held a series of informal workshops in anticipation of holding a TBL rate case commencing early next year. The TBL wants to' establish rates for a two-year period, and has indicated a desire to settle rather than litigate this case. At these workshops, the TBL has indicated that if there is a litigated rate case, it would seek a 3% increase for all transmission rates. In addition to this increase, TBL stated that it would have to start compensating the Bonneville Power Business Line (PBL) for the redispatch of federal gen~rating resources undertaken to relieve transmission congestion affecting Network Transmission (NT) deliveries. During the course of these workshops, the cost of this redispatch to NT customers was estimated at $3.0 to $6.0 million. During the course of the informal workshops, a settlement proposal was developed that has been offered to the customers for consideration and execution. The initial deadline for the execution ofthe proposed settlement was November 12,2002. The City, along with many other utilities, has requested an extension in order to give their governing bodies time to consider this settlement. Major Elements of the Proposed Settlement A. The overall increase to all transmission rates (including NT and Point to Point (PTP) service) is 1.5% for a two-year rate period. B. The TBL will pay the PBL $3.0 million per year as compensation for the redispatch of federal generating resources to support NT transmission deliveries. Of the $3.0 million, NT transmission customers will pay $1.0 million through an additional 1.0% increase to the NT transmission rate (for a total NT rate increas?f2.5%). . November 19, 2002 City Council RE: Transmission Rate Case Settlement Page 2 . C. The current treatment of General Transfer Agreement (GT A) service and GT A costs remains unchanged, and the parties agree not to contest such matters at FERC or in court. D. The Unauthorized Increase Charge (UIC) is limited to two times the monthly charge for the type of service being provided. E. The parties acknowledge that the redispatch of hydro resources has value, and agree to participate in a process during the rate period to establish a method for appropriately valuing redispatch. F. Bonneville agrees that by October 1, 2003 it will have in place the appropriate facilities to permit transmission customers to redirect their firm transmis~ion capacity by temporarily modifying their points of receipt and points of delivery. . . G. Bonneville agrees to conduct forums to consider adoptingTBL business practices on the following topics: a. Operating Reserves - Spinning and Supplemental Services b. Real power losses c. Curtailment during Real Time d. Scheduling practices Other Matters The TBL representatives indicated that they preferred settlement to litigating this case, due to the . press of other work such as Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) West. While reducing their initial rate increase amount from 3.0% to 1.5%, the TBL did not provide any justification for the level of the proposed rate increase, other than to indicate that they needed additional revenues to finance system additions. The consensus of the customer representatives that have participated in the informal workshops is that the offered settlement is more advantageous to the customers than they would be likely to achieve if the rate case were fully litigated. It appears that most of the transmission customers will be executing the proposed settlement. . This rate change will increase our wholesale cost of transmission by about $38,000. This increase will not cause a change to the City's retail rates to its customers. This issue was discussed at the November 12,2002 Utility Advisory Committee and the committee supported the recommendation outlined above. . N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Trans rate case settlement.wpd 58 . . . CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING: ROLL CALL: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: PUBLIC CEREMONIES, PRESENT A TIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS: Beautification A ward to Chestnut Cottage Introduction of Senior Cent~r Supervisor Proclamation recognizing Dorothy Duncan for Service to City Proclamation recognizing George Kheriaty's Hamilton School Recycling Program CITY COUNCIL MEETING Port Angeles, Washington November 5, 2002 I, Mayor Wiggins called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order at 6:00 p.m. Members Present: Mayor Wiggins, Councilmembers Braun, Campbell, Erickson, Headrick, Rogers, and Williams. Members Absent: None. Staff Present: Manager Quinn, Attorney Kn\ltson, Clerk Upton, B. Collins, M. Connelly, G. Cutler, D. McKeen, Y. Ziomkowski, L. Kheriaty, T. Gallagher, D. Millar, P. Burrett;]. Cole, D. Bellamente, S. McLain, J. Mason, M. Sanders, L. Doyle, S. Johns, and C. Kochanek. Public Present: B. Monro, G. Kheriaty, R. Andrade, B. Schultz, J. Bohman, K. Monds, P. Lamoureux, K. Smith, L.Engel, L. Amundson, T. Price, C. & M. Amundson, M. Gagnon. N. Creelman, G. Holka, and D. Tschimperle. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Scout Troop 1990, Scoutmaster Randy , Gardner. 1. Beautification Award to Chestnut Cottage: Mayor Wiggins presented a Beautification A ward to the Chestnut Cottage. The award was accepted by Ken Nemirow and Diane Nagler. 2. Introduction of Doris "Dee" Bellamente, Senior Center Supervisor: Senior Center Supervisor, Dee Bellamente, was introduced by Parks & Recreation Director Connelly, after which Ms. Bellamente shared her background and expertise. 3. Proclamation recognizing Dorothy Duncan's distinguished service to City of Port Angeles: Mayor Wiggins read and presented a Proclamation to Dorothy Duncan, honoring her many years of distinguished service to the City and the community. 4. Proclamation recognizing George Kheriaty 's Hamilton School 5th Graders Recycling Program: Mayor Wiggins read and presented a Proclamation to Hamilton School Teacher George Kheriaty in recognition of the School's recycling efforts. Mr. Kheriaty was accompanied by students involved in the endeavor, and he then made a brief presentation, showing pictures of the program at work. Recycling Coordinator Millar 59 - 1 - CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 5, 2002 Chamber of Cornmerce Report WORK SESSION: LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON TillS OR FUTURE AGENDAS: joined in the recognition, noting the School's efforts had resulted in a savings of$9,000 per year. . 5. Chamber of Commerce Report presented by Russ Veenema, Chamber Executive Director: Russ Veenema, Executive Director of the Chamber ofCornmerce, presented a quarterly status report to the Council. Mr. Veenema distributed a spreadsheet reflecting year-to- date door counts, room taxes, sales taxes, web visits, and town' occupancies. He informed the Council that concentrated efforts have taken place with regard to marketing the non-surnmermonths, and many of the figures in the spreadsheet reflect an increase over the previous year. He also distributed copies of two issues of the Tacoma News Tribute, one focused on a joint marketing cooperative for the entire North Olympic Peninsula, and the other focused on the Port Angeles History Weekend event. Mr. Veenema reflected on the success of the History Weekend, thanking City staff members Ken Dubuc and Lou Haehnlen for their assistance. He indicated this particular event involved more volunteers than any other event held thus far, and the event itself atn:acted over 500 people. He felt this is a product that can be further developed in order to create more interest throughout the year in the form of self-tours, guided tours, and the like. Mr. Veenema asked for the City's assistance by not filling in the underground, and he offered kudos to the City for its efforts toward historical preservation in theJorm of the Carnegie Library, as well as the beautification program. Jackson Smart, 472 Mount Pleasant Road, dressed in period garb, was one of the tour guides during the History Weekend. He implored the City to do whatever possible to preserve its historical sites, as those attending this event had a wonderful time. Mr. Smart was joined by two "ladies of the evening", who spoke of the successful event and . urged the Council to preserve the underground. Betsy Schultz, new owner of the Tudor Inn Bed & Breakfast, informed the Council that she participated in the History We'ekend by hosting tours of her historical residence. She indicated that some guests extended their stay in order to participate, and she encouraged the City to do everything possible in support of underground tours and trolley tours. Mike Millar, who worked as a volunteer during the event, indicated that everyone is concerned about the last section of the underground on Laurel Street. He offered the possibility of joint efforts to obtain funding, and he requested the City's ongoing assistance to increase the number of tours. Don Perry, a longtime advocate of the underground tours, related the importance of the tours to the entire Peninsula. He felt the tours will prove to be income producing, citing the successes in Seattle and Pendleton with sirnilartours. He asked for the City's ongoing support. None. JeffBohman, 3753 Canyon Circle, addressed the Council as President of the Peninsula Trails Coalition.' On behalf of the Coalition, Mr. Bohman thanked the Council members for their support in completing the portion of the Trail through the Rayonier site. He presented the Council and staff with Coalition lapel pins in appreciation of their efforts, and he expressed interest in working towards a route out of town on the west side. Additionally, Mr. Bohman looked forward to working with the area . governmental entities in developing a comprehensive trail management plan. Bruce Monro, 91 E. Palmer, Sequim, President of the Olympic Peninsula Bicyclists and 60 - 2- . . . LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON THIS OR FUTURE AGENDAS: (Cont'd) FINANCE: A ward Contract for "I" Street & Lauridsen Blvd. Sidewalks A ward for Equipment Purchase - Parks Tractor- Backhoe A ward Contract for Front Street Waterline A ward Contract for Landfill Cell 3 Drainage CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 5, 2002 past member ofthe Port Angeles Non-Motorized Committee, thanked the Council and staff for completing the extra section of the Waterfront Trail and also for creating the future bike lanes on "<;::"Street, as well as the newly created lanes on Race Street, Boulevard, and 8th Street. He felt these additions to be a great complement to the City's "Bicycle Friendly" program. Jean Martin, a CPA who resides at 120 W. Maple in Sequim, was present as a representative of tht; Port Angeles Fine Arts Center Board of Trustees. The Board appreciates the Cou~cil's past support, and Ms. Martin expressed hope for the Council's continuedsupport in the future. She indicated people from out of town visit the Center, and the sculpture park is gaining recognition far and wide. Tourists who spend money in town are being attracted to the facility, and the funds expended by the City on the Center are being matched by thousands of volunteer hours. Ms. Martin also offered kudos to City staff and the Center Director, Jake Seniuk. 1. Award Contractfor "J"Street & Lauridsen Boulevard Sidewalks, Project 22- 03: Public Works & Utilities Director Cutler briefly summarized the bid information relative to the completion of the school walking route sidewalk work on the west side of "I" Street from 12th to 16th Street, as well as on the south side of Lauridsen Boulevard between Jones and Liberty Streets. Following brief discussion, Council member Rogers moved to award the contract for the "I" Street and Lauridsen Boulevard Sidewalks, Project 22-03, to Aldergrove Construction of Port Angeles and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract in the amount of $234,360.26. The motion was seconded by Councilman Braun and carried unanimously. 2. Equipment Purchase - Parks Department Tractor-Backhoe, Project 22-02- 12: Director Cutler reviewed the information pertinent to the purchase of a Tractor- Backhoe for the Parks Department. Discussion ensued on the trade-in of$5,000, the fact that Public Works and Parks do share equipment whenever possible, and the reasons the bulk of the bids were determined to be unresponsive. Councilman Campbell moved to award the bid to the low responsive bidder, Tri-County Equipment Rentals of Everett, reject all remaining bids as non-responsive, and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract in the amount of$30,652.67. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Erickson and carried unanimously. 3. Award Contract for Front Street Waterline, Project 22-19: Director Cutler reviewed the bid information for the Front Street Waterline, noting he was pleased with the amount oflocal interest generated in the project, plus the fact that the low bid came in below the Engineer's estimate. Project work should commence in a week or two. Councilman Braun moved to award the contract for the Front Street Waterline, Project No. 22-19, to Pilchuck Diversified Services of Bothell and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract in the amount of $301,766.88. Councilman Headrick seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. 4. Award Contract for Landfill Cell 3 Drainage Improvements, Project 22-29: Director Cutler reviewed the nature of the project to provide necessary contact water control and collection facilities to prevent contaminated runoff from leaving the site of Cell 3 at the Landfill. This was an unanticipated project, which will be funded from reserves. Brief discussion was held concerning whether the cell is filling sooner than expected, and Director Cutler felt the activity is fairly well on track to 2006. Following brief discussion, Councilman Campbell moved to award the contract for the 61 - 3 - CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 5, 2002 A ward Contract for Landfill Cell 3 Drainage (Cont'd) Structure Abatement PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER: Water/Wastewater Rates Landfill Cell 3 Drainage Improvements, Project 22-29, to Crescent Development, Inc., of Joyce, to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract in the amount of $30,512.40, and to allocate $35,000 from Solid Waste Fund reserves for . construction funding. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Erickson and carried unanimously. 5. Abatement of Structure at 604 S. HB" Street: Community Development Director Collins reviewed the need for structural abatement and responded to an inquiry from Mayor Wiggins in that this was a self-built home that was never completed probably due to lack ofresources. The home has deteriorated over the years and has generated many complaints from area residents. Councilman Williams queried whether the home was involved in a foreclosure, but he later determined it was not. Councilmembers observed there is also another structure on the property, but staff offered assurances that the correct structure would be abated. Brief discussion followed, after which Councilman Headrick moved to authorize the transfer of $4,275.00 to the Repair and Demolition Fund from the General Fund for the demolition of the commercial building at 604 S. "B" Street in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 3.27 P AMC. The motion was seconded by Councilman Braun and carried unanimously. I. Water/Wastewater Rates: Director Cutler introduced Ms. Angie Sanchez Vimoche from Economic and Engineering Services, the firm retained to conduct an analysis on water and wastewater rates. The last study was done in 1999, with rate adjustments implemented during the last three years. With the use of a PowerPoint presentation, Ms. Virnoche provided an overview of the . rate setting process with comparisons made between the revenues and expenses of the utility in order to determine the overall level of rate adjustment. The cost of service is what equitably allocates the revenue requirements between the various customer classes of service, and the rate design involves the setting of rates for each class of service to meet the revenue needs of the utility, to include any other rate design goals and objectives. Ms. Vimoche indicated that each utility is reviewed on a stand alone basis, and key financial indicators are utilized in terms of reserve balances, capital funding, and debt service coverage. She reviewed in detail the comparison of costs for the two utilities from the last rate study to this current study, and she then summarized the three options developed for consideration. The third option has been recommended as the option of choice in order to minimize the rate impact to the customers, that being to assume debt financing, use reserves to a minimumof$4 million, and phase in small rate adjustments over time. Ms. Vimoche reviewed the Water and Wastewater Utility Capital Projects and Funding Sources and the Water and Wastewater Utility Revenue Requirementoptions. Option 3 involves recommended rate increases for the Water Utility in the amount of 4% in 2003, 4% in 2004, and 3% in 2005. No rate increase is being proposed for the Wastewater Utility at this time. Ms. Virnoche provided monthly bill comparisons for both utilities, using information from other utilities on the Peninsula, and she reviewed a summary of proposed metered residential and commercial rates in comparison to those presently being paid. Discussion followed, and Finance Director Ziomkowski was asked for input relative to Option 3. Director Ziomkowski agreed that Option 3 is preferred, as there is benefit by issuing the debt which should be used only for capital projects and not operations. . Councilman Headrickinquired as to how the amount for reserves is determined, and Director Ziomkowski responded that the industry standard is to have 45 - 90 days available in funds for maintenance and operation costs. Ms. Vimoche added that 00- . 62 - 4 - I . . . CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 5, 2002 I Water/Wastewater Rates (Cont'd) scheduled facilities are also a consideration in this regard. Councilman Williams asked if consideration had been given to a flat 5% increase each year, and Ms. Virnoche indicated that this study was done for the next 3 years only; any further long-term projections would prove to be extremely difficult. Councilman Campbell reflected on'comments made at the Utility Advisory Committee meeting in that there is concern with the economic cycle the City is in at the present time. However, it is envisioned that the City's economic well being will improve in 3 years, and it is important to set rates today with the interest of holding rates as low as possible so that future needs can be met by a better economic climate. Manager Quinn agreed that a 3-year time frame for setting rates is a reasonable projection period. Mayor Wiggins opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. Paul Lamoureux, 602 Whidby, asked for clarification from Ms. Virnoche as to the utilization of the rate stabilization fund, after which he maintained the public would be concerned with the use of reserves. He ~uggested the possibility of reversing the increases to 3%, 4%, and 4% respectively over the next 3 years with the hope of lessening the impact on the reserve fund. Director Ziomkowski indicated this concept would require further calculations, as an appropriate balance must be maintained. Mr. ' Lamoureux indicated he would support Option 3as proposed, with the caveat that there be value receiv'ed for the money spent. He felt there should be an increased amount of . . water made available over the base of 100 cu. ft. if the rates are increased. He suggested the base be revised to 150 cu. ft. in the interest of improving the appearance of residential yards. Mr. Lamoureux continued that the residents pay to have City government lawns kept green, so he felt his proposal would serve to also improve the neighborhoods. . Director Cutler offered caution regarding the notion of adjusting the base and the base rate, as consideration should be given to low income families, conservation efforts, and the like. He felt the City has maintained it good balance thus far. However, Mr. Lamoureux indicated he had been informed by a City staff member that water is a fixed cost. Councilman Campbell explained that pumping the water is where the costs are incurred, and the more water pumped, the higher the costs. Ms. Virnoche added that every cost the City incurs in the Water Utility is considered in the rates, to include such matters as infrastructure, utility costs, and fire suppression. This is not just a volume- related issue. Director Cutler offered further clarification by explaining that even ifno water is used during a cycle, the customer must still pay the base rate. He offered to meet with Mr. Lamoureux at another time to provide further explanation on the rate- setting process. There being no further public testimony, Councilman Braun moved to continue the public hearing to November 19, 2002. The motion was seconded by Councilman Williams and carried unanimously. Break Mayor Wiggins recessed the meeting for a break at 8: 1 0 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m. Budget Hearing on Revenue for Year 2003 Budget Hearing on Revenuefor Year 2003: 2. Using a PowerPoint presentation, Finance Director Ziomkowskisubmitted the revenue projections for the 2003 Budget. Total revenues projected are $68,423,978, which Director Ziomkowski reviewed bysource. She reviewed the tax revenue comparisons, aswell as revenues by fund type. General Fund revenues, which are projected at $13,10 I ,066, increased by 1.7% as compared to the 2002 budget and 1 % as compared to 2002 estimates. After adjustments for internal cost allocations and reimbursements for airport security, General Fund revenues actually show a 0.3% decrease. 63 - 5 - CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 5,2002 Budget Hearing on Revenue for Year 2003 (Cont'd) Director Ziomkowski summarized issues pertinent to property taxes which, by virtue ofInitiative 747, are only allowed a 1 % increase plus new construction. The property tax levy for 2002 was $3.53 per $1,000 and the levy for 2003 is projected at $3.58 per . $1,000, resulting in an increase of $7 annually per a $150,000 house. Director Ziomkowski informed the Council there are declining trends for sales taxes, utility taxes, telephone taxes, leasehold taxes, and liquor excise taxes. Because interest rates are much lower, income from investments will also decrease. I, Director Ziomkowski reviewed the budgeted status of other revenue sources, after which Manager Quinn detailed proposed increases in charges, or user fees, to include Planning fees for an additional $4,400, building permit fees for an additional $15,000, and pool fees for an additional $20,000. In addition, to offset the increasing cost of maintaining various Parks facilities, it is recommended there be an athletic field fee of $7-$10 per player per season. Discussion followed concerning the increased fees, with staff providing further information and clarification. Director Ziomkowski 'then reviewed the anticipated revenues pertinent to the Street Fund, gas taxes, lodging taxes, and the different utility funds. Noting that 52% of all revenues are derived from utility rates, she noted there are no rate increases planned at this time for the Electric Utility. In addition, no increase has been instituted for the Solid Waste Utility since 1994. Paul Lamoureux, 602 Whidby, thanked the Council for the hard work on the Budget preparation. He sought clarification concerning the next public hearing, which Director Ziomkowski indicated would concentrate on the expense side of the Budget. In addition, it is expected that the property tax levy would be considered. Mr: Lamoureux also asked for clarification on the matter of the 1 % property tax increase; Manager Quinn and Director Ziomkowski explained the voter-initiated limitations on property tax levies. Mr. Lamoureux reminded Council that many residents are Impacted by this increase. He then directed attention to lodging taxes, suggesting an increase could be accomplished without impact to the amount of tourism in the area. Director Ziomkowski clarified that the City is receiving a 2% lodging tax from the State via a reduction in the State's portion of sales tax receipts, plus the City initiated an additional 2%. Everyone staying in a Port Angeles lodge is paying a 10.2% tax. Mr. Lamoureux felt there is confusion regarding a document in a previous Council packet concerning assistance with stormwater permitting in a budgeted amount of $25,000 and a contracted amount of $21,000. He noted the amended contract amount exceeded the budgeted amount. He felt that, once a budgeted project is bid and the bid comes in under budget, he felt that should be the fmal price. Mike Millar, 1327 E. 1'1 Street, addressed the matter of decreased leasehold taxes related to the Westport project. In addition, he advised the Council that, when he did business in Ocean Shores, he was required to pay a permit fee because he did not live in Ocean Shores. Mr. Millar suggested a similar policy in the City might help in generating additional revenue. Brief discussion followed concerning leasehold taxes . and the trade-off in the interest of economic development. Mayor Wiggins closed the public hearing at 9:29 p.m 64 -6- 1---- . . . Mischke Street Vacation - STY 02-03 CONSENT AGENDA: CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS: ", ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC HEARINGS: MCA 01-02B Sign Code Ordinance No. 3126 CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 5, 2002 3. Mischke Street Vacation - STV 02-03: Director Collins related to the Council that the applicant is out of town and has asked that the public hearing b'e continued until his return. Therefore, Mayor Wigg~ns opened. the public hearing at 9:31 p.m., and Council member Erickson moved to continue the public hearing to November 19, 2002. Councilmember Rogers seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. In consIdering acceptance of the Consent Agenda, Councilmember Rogers directed attention to Page 1 of the October 15, 2002, City Council minutes, Item 1 under Finance. She noted the motion lacked a second and a vote. [Clerk's Note: The motion was seconded by Councilmember Rogers and carried unanimously.] Following questions concerning the Check List, Councilman Braun moved to accept the Consent Agenda, to include: 1.) City Council minutes of October 15,2002 regular meeting, as corrected, and October 22, 2002 special,meetirig; 2.) Check register - October 29,2002 - $677,381.58; and 3.) Electronic payments - October 25,2002 - $1,411,202.00. Councilman Campbell seconded the motion which carried 6 - 0, with Councilmember Erickson abstaining due to absence from the October 22 meeting. Councilmember Rogers referenced the North Peninsula Building Association newsletter in which an article commended Economic Development Director Smith, the City Manager, and the Council for efforts in the area of economic development. She represented the Council at the Leadership Prayer Breakfast and spent a great deal of time on economic development issues related to the cluster development. Councilmember Rogers provided public comment before the Sequim City' Council regarding upcoming retail development, she met with representatives of the Fire Department, and she attended a meeting on Elwha economic development projects. Councilmember Rogers also spent time with Congressman Dicks who praised the City for its handling of, the project on dam removal; she commended Chief Riepe for his comments at Leland 'Lee's memorial service. On behalf of the City, Councilman Williams attended the groundbreaking for the expansion of the Boys & Girls Club. Councilman Campbell, reporting on behalf of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, indicated the most recent marketing plan submitted by Randal Ehm was revised to remove elements of reference to hotel marketing as opposed to marketing the conference center. The committee agreed with a recommendation of The Chambers Group that the latest version of the marketing plan should be considered satisfactory for current needs in order to move on to the next phase, which is allowing Ehm to focus on the project appraisal, managing and marketing agreements, franchise agreement, and financing package. A time line will be negotiated with Mr. Ehm for accomplishing these tasks. 1. MCA OI-02E Sign Code: Community DevelopmentDirector Collins referenced a matrix he had distributed to the Council, identifying by zone and sign type the requirements relative to the amended Sign Code. He indicated the main change incorporated is that the City will now permit A-frame signs, as well as temporary commercial signs up to 100 sq. ft. In the case of billboards, a 300 sq. ft. size limitation has been established, with a 35 foot height limit. Director Collins indicated that the requirement to affix A- frame signs to sidewalks has been eliminated. Fluttering devices are permitted, with the exception of those made of mylar or conductive materials. Director Collins offered a correction to the draft Ordinance, Page 5, Chapter 14.36.050 Exempt Signs, Section 0.: "Signs painted directly on windows, and window signs, ..." 65 - 7- CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 5, 2002 ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Cont'd) MCA 01-02B Sign Code Ordinance No. 3126 (Cont'd) Port of Port Angeles - Clarification of Prior Street Vacation Ordinance No. 3127 Resolution No. 15-02 should be corrected to read, "Signs painted directly on windows, and inside window signs, ..." Referencing Chapter 14.36.070 Pennitted Signs, Sections D. and E., Director Collins suggested the height of building-mounted signs should be consistent . between the Commercial Office and Commercial Neighborhood zones. The draft Ordinance reflected a maximum height of20 feet in the CN Zone and 30 feet in the CO Zone; Director Collins suggested both height restrictions should be 20 feet. Director Collins expressed appreciation to the many business groups who assisted in this effort. Discussion followed concerning off-premise signs, as well as whether businesses should be required to seek both a Sign Pennit and a Right-of-Way Use Permit and be charged for both of the pennits. Councilmember Rogers was of the opinion that a charge of two fees would be unacceptable. Mayor Wiggins read the Ordinance by title, entitled . . ORDINANCE NO. 3126 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, creating a new City-wide Side Code by incorporating the downtown sign code requirements for commercial, industrial, and institutional signs and adding new regulations for commercial message signs to include allowances for A-' frame signs, temporary commercial event signs, and electronic messaging signs and specifications for the maximum size of billboard sig'ns, repealing certain sign regulations in the Zoning Code, and amending Ordinances 1709 and 2152, as amended, and Chapter 14.36 and Title 17 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. Councilman Braun moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title, incorporating the two suggested changes and citing Findings 1 - 8 and Conclusions 1 - 5, as set . forth in Exhibit" A" which is attached to and becomes a part of these minutes. Councilman Headrick seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. 2. Port of Port Angeles: POPA STV 02-04 - Clarification of Prior Street Vacation: Director Collins explained the purpose of this amending Ordinance was to clarify the intent of earlier street vacation ordinances in vacating properties located between Valley Street and the Inner Harbor Line north of Marine Drive. The amending Ordinance would require that additional compensation be paid by the Port. Because a Resolution was previously passed setting a public hearing to vacate the property in question and because the amending Ordinance was chosen as the best course of action, Council is also being asked to rescind Resolution No. 14-02. Councilman Williams indicated the Real Estate Committee concurs with the recommendation. Mayor Wiggins read the Resolution by title, entitled RESOLUTION NO. 15-02 A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, rescinding Resolution 14-02, which had set a public hearing to consider a street vacation petition for a portion of Tumwater Street south of the north margin of First Street. Councilmember Erickson moved to pass the Resolution as read by title. Councilman Williams seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. . 66 - 8 - CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 5,2002 . Port of Port Angeles - Clarification of Prior Street Vacation Ordinance No. 3127 Resolution No. 15-02 Mayor Wiggins read the Ordinance by title, entitled ORDINANCE NO. 3127 , AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, correcting an inadvertent omission in a street vacation ordinance by clarifying that the "one block length ofTumwater Street lying north of Marine Drive" included the intersection ofTumwater and First Streets and by amending the compensation amount accordingly and amending Ordinance 2395. Councilmember Erickson moved to adopt the Ordinance as read by title. The motion was seconded by Councilman Braun and carried unanimously. RESOLUTIONS: None. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: J. Creelman Appeal- CUP 02-10: Creelman Appeal - CUP 02-10 . Councilmembers Braun, Williams, and Rogers departed the meeting at 10:00 p.m. due to an appearance offairness on this agenda item. Attorney KnutsO)) explained that the reason the Councilmembers had to disqualify themselves is pursuant to the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine. In one case, there were discussions between a Councilmember and one of the parties interested in the appeal. At the time of the discussions, the Councilmember was unaware there was an appeal pending. The other two Councilmembers are involved in the real estate business, and there is a recent sale that could be affected by the outcome of this appeal. In the interest of faimess and to legally protect the decision made by the Council, the appeal should be conducted without the participation of those three Councilmembers. . Attorney Knutson pointed out this is an appeal on the record before the Planning Commission, which means that comments made to the Council by the appellant, Mrs. Vi Creelman, and by the Planning Department will be based on the' evidence that has, already been presented to the Planning Commission. He stated there, wouldn't be any additional witnesses or additional testimony. ", Vi Creelman, 1219 Columbia Street, advised the Council she was appealing the decision to allow a daycare center at the comer of Liberty and Columbia Streets, based largely on safety of the children and residents. The daycare center is located at the top of a 60-foot bluff, which Mrs. Creelman felt is no place for a daycarecenter. She indicated there are several elderly people who reside in the area and who walk the vicinity with their caregivers. The area is hazardous for lack of stop signs and excessive traffic speeds, and the daycare center will only add to the traffic congestion. She felt police reports would confirm there are a lot of traffic accidents in the area. Mrs. Creelman related that her main concern is for the children, and the daycare center should not be on the bluff.' Mrs. Creelman indicated she was unable to attend the hearing, and most of the people who live in the area are elderly and cannot go out at night in order to attend these hearings. She came out in order to represent those neighbors by appealing the daycare center on a 60- foot bluff; there are other properties in the area that would be a better location for such a center. . Community Development Director Collins indicated that, in the process, the department had included a new site plan on Page 120, which he asked the Council to disregard. Similarly, on Page 101, he asked the Council to not consider Findings 15- 18 which are related to work that has been done by the applicant in regard to the conditions for approval. Due to the closed nature of the appeal, Director Collins indicated staff would limit the review to simply what the Planning Commission reviewed at the time its decision was made. In a document just distributed to the Council, Director Collins indicated there are 7 conditions, 14 findings, and 7 conclusions that were part of the Planning Commission decision. There were 2 new 67 - 9- CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 5, 2002 OTHER CONSIDERA nONS: (Cont'd) Creelman Appeal - CUP 02-10 (Cont'd) appeal process findings and I additional conclusion as revised by staff. He indicated it is in the intent of a Conditional Use Permit to allow uses, such as daycares, in residential areas as long as there are conditions that address any concerns that may anse. . Associate Planner Johns described his review of the original site plan submitted for the daycare center and his conversations withMrs. Creelman regarding her concern with traffic. He concluded the site plan could be conditioned to make the access more efficient and to reduce some of the traffic impacts. He asked for a condition of a one- way drive-through type of parking lot so that; instead of parking on the street and driving through the neighborhood, clients would be able to enter and exit the parking lot without a lot of backing. He felt this would also provide better assurances of safety to the other clients and children. Mr. Johns responded to an inquiry from the Mayor regarding the site plan and parking plan, and he then addressed Mrs. Creelman's concern with inadequate off-street parking. Mr. Johns conditioned the CUP to meet the . parking requirements as listed in Code. Brief discussion followed concerning the number and location of parking spaces being planned for the project, and the applicant has revised the site plan as recommended by staff. Mrs. Creelman was also concerned With the Ennis Street opening, which is an issue about which the applicant cannot be concerned and is not an issue subject to Community Development review. This also holds true concerning Mrs. Creelman's desire to have Ennis Street widened because of the project. Another issue raised was the lack of sidewalks, and Mr. Johns said there are areas With and Without sidewalks in the vicinity. Neither of the streets adjacent to the property are arterials, nor are they school walking routes, so Mr. Johns did not require a condition to include sidewalks. It is anticipated that most of the children will be arriving by vehicle and not walking. The matter of children's safety was addressed with a condition to include a fence to separate the children's play area from the steep bluff, from the parking areas, and from the driveways and streets. In addition, the State Department of Social & Health Services will also review the proposal before the facility will be licensed as a daycare in accordance with the State WACs. There will be a 25-foot setback from ~e top of the bluff to the areas to be used for play. . Mrs. Creelman listed conflict with the old filter plant, and Mr. Johns believed this was in reference to the old Rayonier site which is closed and being cleaned up. In that the future use of that site is presently unknown, it would be difficult to condition a permit accordingly. There was a requirement, however, that thesoiis on the site be tested for contaminants. In response to a question from Mayor Wiggins, Mr. Johns indicated the soil test must be conducted prior to the time an occupancy permit can be issued, Mr. Johns noted that Mrs. Creelman felt the facility was not needed in the area, which is not something to be considered by Community Development. Rather, he felt market forces would make that determination. There was testimony at the. Planning Commission, however, that there is a lack of daycare facilities in Port Angeles. Other issues to be addressed were noise and traffic impacts, and efforts were made to minimize traffic impacts by the parking requirements With the loop scenario in the parking lot. Mr. Johns related that it is not expected that the daycare center would generate any additional noise above that of a single family with several children. Mrs. Creelman had indicated that the site plan showed a building that does not exist, and the Community Development Department was uncertain how to respond to that issue. In addition, Mrs. Creelman had asked if the City assumed any risk if DSHS required fencing and retaining walls. Mr. Johns indicated there were conditions put in place to provide adequate fencing and adequate safety. When the children are in the play area, they will be supervised, and he was sure DSHS had specific guidelines regarding a certain number of supervisors for the children. He noted the 25-foot set- 68 . - 10- 1-- . . . OTHER CONSIDERA nONS: (Cont'd) Creelman Appeal - CUP 02-10 (Cont'd) Independent Bible Church Appeal of Determination of Significance- CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 5, 2002 back between the fencing and the bluff, and he was uncertain if the City would accept any liability if there were an injury. Mr. Johns reiterated the City's opinion that the issue of the 60-foot bl';lffhad been appropriately conditioned. Discussion followed, and Councilman Campbell noted that one of the conditions stipulated there would be no proposed development within the 25- foot buffer. It would appear that one of the planned play areas comes fairly close to the buffer, and Mr. Johns responded that the specific play area would have been within the 25-foot buffer I as originally drawn on the site plan. This precipitated the condition for the 25-foot setback, which is also required because it is an environmentally sensitive area. Mr. Johns further described the site plan, after which Councilman Campbell inquired as to the height of the cyclone fence. Mr. Johns responded the applicant is planning on a 5- foot fence. Director Collins indicated the correct procedure would be to next seek a,rebuttal from the appellant. Mrs. Creelman returned to the podium and, referencing the site plans, indicated she had been informed by the City Attorney that the only site plan that could be addressed this evening was the original plan. However, she indicated that Mr. Johns had referenced other site plans, and she took exception to the. discrepancy in the procedures followed in the appeal process. Mrs. Creelman understood that the children would not be pre-schoolers; the older children could easily go over a 5-foot fence in order to retrieve a ball. She reiterated that a daycare does not belong on a 60-foot bluff, questioning the City's liability if anything does happen. Councilman Campbell queried as to the age of the children, and Mrs. Creelman thought they would be school age children. She felt it unfair to the elderly residents to allow this daycare, to allow. the traffic, and to allow children on a 60-foot bluff. . Director Collins identified two issues that may be troubling. One is how the fence will protect the children from the bluff, and he felt the combination of the fence and adult supervision to be the answer. The Council could consider the height of the fence and whether it would be adequate. The other issue is how a daycare center is unfair to the ' elderly residents, and Director Collins felt that in a conditional use, it is assumed to be a permitted activity as long as the conditions are applied in order to allow the activity in a permitted zone. He indicated that the safety of the children is of primary concern, and the City is simply making a land use decision, not becoming responsible for the operation of the daycare center. He asked the Council to deny the appeal. Discussion followed with questions raised regarding the soil test and the height of the fence. Mayor Wiggins reflected on a similar situation in his neighborhood, which resulted in a very compatible center immediately next door to his residence. The individual Councilmembers expressed their position on the appeal, after which Councilman Headrick moved to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's Septemberll, 200~, decision citing Conditions 1 -7, Findings 1- 16, and Conclusions 1 - 8, as set forth in Exhibit "B" which is attached to and becomes a part of these minutes. The motion was seconded by Councilman Campbell. For the record, Attorney Knutson cautioned the Council that any reference in the packet or testimony to the site plan submitted following the Planning Commission hearing should not be considered - only the original site plan could be referenced. A vote was taken on the motion, which carried 4 - O. Councilmembers Braun, Williams, and Rogers returned to the meeting. 2. Independent Bible Church (IBe) Appeal of Determination of Significance: Director Collins related that the Independent Bible Church applied for a Conditional Use Permit to expand the school and relocate their offices to the Church site at Ahlvers Road and Laurel Street. It is proposed that the appeal be continued in order to allow time for staff and mc to work towards completing a limited scope Environmental Impact Statement to allow the project to move forward with proposed mitigation. 69 - 11 - CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 5, 2002 Soccer Club Storage Building at Lincoln Park PUBLIC HEARINGS - QUASI-JUDICIAL: INFORMATION: , EXECUTIVE SESSION: ADJOURNMENT: Therefore, Council member Erickson moved to continue the appeal to December 3, 2002. The motion was seconded by Councilman Campbell and carried 6 - 0, with Councilman Williams abstaining. 3. Soccer Club Storage Building at Lincoln Park: Parks & Recreation Director Connelly briefly reviewed the recommendation forwarded by the Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission to approve the construction of a storage building at Lincoln Park. Director Connelly indicated similar buildings have been constructed elsewhere, and this is a good example ofa partnership between the City and the youth groups. Following brief discussion on displaced parking that will be located in another area, Councilman Braun moved to approve the Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission recommendation for the construction of a new equipment storage building at Lincoln Park by the Port Angeles Youth Soccer Club. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Rogers and carried' unanimously. None. It was noted there will be a Budget Committee meeting this corning Friday at 10:30 a.m. Mayor Wiggins thanked the committee members, as well as staff, for their diligence and hard work on the upcoming budget. Council was reminded of the Veteran's Day Regional Site Recognition on Monday, November 11th. None. The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 p.m. Glenn Wiggins, Mayor Becky J. Upton, City Clerk 70 - 12- . . . 02/11/12-08:26 City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE Novenber 12 2002 Page 2 CHECK REGISTER . Date From 10/26/2002 To 11/08/2002 Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount Number Name Number Number 73250 United Parcel Service 21005 Shipping charges-October 230 4210 6.99 73257 Xerox corporation 24001 DC440AC lease-September 205 4530 641. 65 DC490SLC lease-September 205 4530 2,558.54 WCP416C3 lease-September 205 4530 98.06 DC440AC lease-October 205 4530 3,746.36 DC490SLC lease-October 205 4530 2,558.54 Total for Finance 18,231.27 0003 73014 Clallam Jefferson Publ i c Dfndr 03274 Public Defender fee-November 312 4150 2,750.00 73111 Qwest 21001 10-14 Qwest billing 311 4210 162.31 73257 Xerox Corporation 24001 DC220SLX lease-September 312 4530 239.03 DC220SLX lease-September 311 4530 102.44 Total for Attorney 3,253.78 0004 72980 AT&T Wireless Services 01404 10-14 AT&T a/c 49079080 420 4210 . 7.90 73111 Qwest 21001 10-14 Qwestbilling 411 4210 92.75 73147 Yount, George 25135 Refund permit fee overpmt 420 32210017 60.55 73149 AT&T Wireless Services 01404 11-02 AT&T a/c 44324994 420 4810 1. 73226 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 N Pen Bus Assn mtg-Haehnlen 420 4310 3~1. 73257 Xerox Corporation 24001 DC420SX lease-September 420 4530 Total for Community Development Dept 538.99 0005 72980 AT&T Wireless Services 01404 09-27 AT&T a/c 49635824 530 4210 71.76 09-14 AT&T a/c 49655020 530 4210 . 15.31 09-27 AT&T a/c 49945710 530 4210 12.33 10-05 AT&T a/c 49470974 530 4210 7.78 10-02 AT&T a/c 49975063 530 4210 42.24 72998 Blakefield, Marilyn 02395 Repai r jumpsui t 530 3101 5.45 73010 City of Forks 06075 September board bill 512 5099 1,837.07 73013 Clallam Cnty Sheriff's Dept 03074 Inmate care-February 2002 512 5099 35,465.40 73083 Moore Medical Corporation 13063 First aid supplies 530 3101 122.83 73088 National Police Chiefs 14062 2002 Law Directory 511 3101 117.94 73111 Qwest 21001 10-14 Qwest billing 511 4210 162.31 10-14 Qwest billing 534 4210 115.93 10-14 Qwest billing 530 4210 23.19 09-20 Qwest billing 534 4210 261.45 73137 Verizon Wireless - Bellevue 01105 09-13 Verizon billing 530 4210 74.33 73157 Blumenthal Uniforms & Equip 02047 Shirt,pants 530 3101 250.36 Credit shirt,pants 530 3101 202.01- Cord 530 3101 19.53 Narcotic tests 530 3101 29.33 Narcotic tests 530 3101 49.05 73206 Lynn Peavey Company 12056 Bags, tubes 530 3101 ~. 73228 Portside Inn 16440 Accreditation team lodging 511 3101 73250 United Parcel Service 21005 Shipping charges-October 534 4210 14.29 Shipping charges-October 530 4210 6.01 72 Total for Pol ice 38,833.84 I ,..! 02/11/12-08:26 City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE November 122002 Page 3 . CHECK REGISTER Oate From 10/26/2002 To 11/08/2002 Fnd Dpt' Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount Number Name Number Number 0006 72980 AT&T ~ireless Services 01404 10-02 AT&T a/c 47190061 645 4210 6.98 72982 Abram, Jeff 01054 Reimburse supplies 642 3101 53.94 73011 ClaLlam Cnty EMS 03068 Medic I Advisory-November 643 4150 500.00 73050 InSource Inc 09154 Strategy & Tactic~ training 645 4310 3,546.71 73108 Port Angeles Fire Oepartment 16025 Reimb assist program funds 611 4990 100.00 73111 Qwest 21001 10-14 Qwest billing 611 4210 115.93 10-14 Qwest billing 642 4210 23.19 10-14 Qwest billing 643 4210 23.19 10-14 Qwest billing, 641 4210 69.56 73139 ~A State Assn of Fire Marshals 23047 2002 Training seminars-Abram 642 4310 25.00 73157 Blumenthal Uniforms & Equip 02047 Emblem 611 2080 3.26 73200 Kroesen's Inc 11020 Sh i rts 642 2080 136.49 73203 Larry'S Janitor Service 12040 Janitorial services-Sept 684 4150 395.00 Janitorial services-October 684 4150 395.00 73205 Life Assist 12202 Shears,dressings,bandages 643 3101 125.61 73207 M & P Garage Doors 13100 Repair door 684. 4810 576.70 73257 Xerox Corporation 24001 DC220SS lease-September 611 4530 197.97 Total for Fire 6,294.53 .0007 72976 AP~A/Amer Public ~orks Assn 01359 CEU ~orkshop-Cutler 711 4310 7.00 73111 Qwest 21001 10-14 Qwest billing 711 4210 649.22 73137 Verizon ~ireless - Bellevue 01105 10-15 Verizon billing 711 4210 9.92 10-15 Verizon billing 711 4210 9.92 10~15 Verizon billing 711 4210 9.92 73149 AT&T ~ireless Services 01404 10~27 AT&T a/c 48966287 711 4210 25.67 73154 American Public ~orks Assn 01064 Continuing education-Cutler 711 4310 20.00 73155 American Public ~orks Assn 01359 Renew membership-Cutler 711 4901 380.00 73172 Cutler, Glenn 03509 Reimb AP~A conf registration 711 4310 295.00 73174 Day-Timers Inc 04040 Calendar refills,blank pages 711 3101 68.20 73199 Kenworthy, Gary 11013 Reimburse mileage 711 4310 37.00 73226 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 Filing fees-Funston 711 4990 20.00 73257 Xerox Corporation 24001 DC460SLC lease-September 711 4530 1,190.41 Total for Public ~orks 2,722.26 0008 72978 ASM Signs 01405 Sign 811 4150 37.87 72983 Acorn, ~ill i am G 01106 Rent work boat. 865 4990 640.00 72988 Angeles Plumbing Inc 01039 Service kitchen drain 863 4810 78.44 73019 Connelly, Marc 03586 Natl Park & Rec Conference 811 4310 410.00 73026 Dunlap Towing Company 04330 Tow city floats to ramp 865 4990 380.00 73029 ~ashington (Unemp), State of 23178 3rd Qtr Unemployment 865 2060 178.55 73038 Gateway Companies Inc 07195 Computer 863 3160 1,480.19 Computer 866 3160 661.12 Computer 865 3160 661.11 . 73039 Gibson Design Group 07207 Architectural svcs-Ruddell 811 4150 650.00 73060 Johnstone supply Inc 10026 HoneywelL thermostats 830 3120 495.17 73074 Mathews GLass Co Inc 13107 Furnish/instaLL gLass 863 4810 100.09 73075 Matthews InternationaL 13664 Bronze plate-Bates 866 3401 125.00 B~1!r plate-Young 866 3401 92.00 Name pLate-Baker 866 3401 92.00 02/11/12-08:26 Fnd Opt Check Number 101 0001 102 0007 City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE CHECK REGISTER , Date From 10/26/2002 To 11/08/2002 Vendor Name Vendor Number 73097 Olympic Sewer & Drain Cleaning 15169 73111 Qwest 21001 73112 RWE Distributing 0425,2 73126 Shotwell Corp, Jonathan 19019 73138 WA Recreation & Park Assn/WRPA 23007 73160 Builders Hardware & supply Co 02071 73163 C & H Distributors Inc 03708 73164 CEO/Consolidated Elec Dist Inc 03267 73181 Familian NW 06020 73210 Maybee's Deli 13036 73226 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 73230 Quiring Monuments Inc 17001 73245 Thurman Supply 20005 73255 Waterless Co LLC 23609 73257 Xerox Corporation 24001 73000 Brewer, David 02055 72995 Best Access Systems 02606 73100 PSC-Philip Services Corp 73111 Qwest 73137 Verizon Wireless - Bellevue 73177 Diversified Resource Center 73201 Lakeside Industries Inc 16511 21001 01105 04052 12036 Description I, ' Service City Pier restroom 10-14 Qwest billing 10-14 Qwest billing 10~14 Qwest billing 10-14 Qwest billing 10-14 Qwest billing 10-14 Qwest billing 10-14 Qwest billing 10-14 Qwest billing 10-14 Qwest billing 10-14 Qwest billing 10-20 Qwest billing Litter bags Sand Playground Safety-Delikat Door weatherstrip Literature racks Light bulbs Flush valve bowl Lunch-Parks/Council meeting Cor~ection tape-Bilsborrow Lesson refund-Rudzinski Marker-Deane 12-20-01 Caulk,crimp,credit coupling Plastic sheeting,guards Toilet seat Credit plastic sheeting Guard,ballcock,switch plates Ballast,battery Traps,sealant DC220SS lease-September DC220SS lease-September Contract services-November November 12 2002 GL Code Number 865 4810 862 4210 811 4210 866 4210 8654210 861 4210 862 4210 863 4210 865 4210 863 4210 862 4210 863 4210 865 3120 866 3120 865 4310 863 4810 863 4810 830 3120 865 3120 811 3101 811 3101 862 34760013 866 3401 865 3120 865 3120 865 3120 865 3120 830 3120 866 3120 830 3120 863 4530 811 4530 Total for Parks & Recreation Total for General Fund 115 4990 Total for Convention Center Fund Locks Keyed padlocks Padlocks Keyed padlocks, core Padlocks,door locks Recycle liquid asphalt 10-14 Qwest billing 10-15 Verizon billing J~;prial services-October Asphii"i t 752 3101 752 3101 752 3101 752 3101 752 3120 752 3120 752 4210 752 4210 752 4810 752 3120 Page 4 . Amount 165.69 41. 03 69.56 23.19 23.19 46.37 23.19 69.56 37.97 38.71 56.50 121.00 404.78 183.94 20.00 146.55 367.08 174.59 133.29 44.. 10 19. 506.35 16.83 46.06 26.73 13.96- 30.32 17.84 149.95 197.97 197.97 9,477.80 80,209,07 100.00 100.00 329.67 321.71 68.76 272.55 21.. 30 69.56 5.06 77.83 130.93 02/11/12-08:26 . FndDpt Check Number 103 0001 107 0005 . 110 0001 150 0009 . 0008 City of Port Angeles - LIVEMACHINE Vendor Name 73236 Ridout, Ken 73253 ~ashington (DOT), State of 73111 Qwest 73182 Federal Express Corp 73226 Port Angeles City Treasurer 72975 APCO Assn of Public Safety 73109 PowerPhone Inc 7311" Qwest 73229 Quill Corporation 73250 United Parcel Service CHECK REGISTER Date From 10/26/2002 To 11/08/2002 Vendor Number 18011 23339 21001 06022 03062 01158 16140 21001 17000 21005 73012 Clallam Cnty Economic Dev Cncl 03067 72980 AT&T ~ireless Services 72994 Beane, Bruce 73016 Clarke, Jerry 73032 Evergreen Collision Center 01404 02714 03670 05126 Description Aspha l t Asphalt Asphalt Reimburse mileage expense Snow & Ice Control class 10-14 Qwest billing October shipping charges Luncheon-Smith November 12 2002 GL Code Number 752 3120 752 3120 752 3120 752 4310 752 4310 Total for Street Fund 123 4210 123 4210 123 4310 Page 5 Amount 3,518.07 680.87 352.68 95.28 280.00 6,723.47 23.19 5.55 6.48 Total for Economic Development 35.22 2003 Dues-Rife #102531 2003 Dues-O'Conner #16242 2003 Dues-German #223110 2003 Dues-~u #57241 2003 Dues-Johnson #65401 2003 Dues-Roedell #65403 2003 Dues-Romberg #69755 2003 Dues-Hanson #77227 2003 Dues-Rife #79953 2003 Dues-Hamlin #79954 2003 Dues-Blakefield #82643 2003 Dues-Crabb #82644 2003 Dues-Homan #97597 2003 Dues-Baughman #99667 2003 Dues-Van Sickle #99668 2003 Dues-Barber #99755 Dispatch class.Frey,~heeler 10-14 Qwest billing 09-23 Qwest billing Calendars;binders,labels Shipping charges-October 532 4901 532 4901 532 4901 532 4901 532 4901 532 4901 532 4901 532 4901 532 4901 532 4901 532 4901 532 4901 532 4901 532 4901 5324901 532 4901 532 4310 532 4210 532 4210 532 3101 532 4210 Total for PenCom Reimburse marketing expenses 130 4150 Phase I Funding Assistance Total for "Port Angeles ~orks" 931 4150 Total for Elec Util Rural Econ Dev Fund 10-05 AT&T a/c 49208770 10-05 AT&T a/c 49208598 Officiate Soccer League 015i ate Soccer League Mini Bus rental 854 4210 854 4210 851 4150 851 4150 854 3101 45.00 45.00 45.00 60.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 698.00 394.18 60.50 90.99 6.78 1,985.45 19,435.42 19,435.42 12,250.00 12,250.00 25.50 28.72 75.00 175.00 92.31 02/11/12-08:26 Fnd Opt Check Number 73033 73051 73055 73056 73084 73116 73148 73150 73158 73171 73192 73193 73194 73198 73208 73215 73224 73226 73238 73240 73242 73243 73244 73249 73256 City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE Vendor Name Eyestone, Paul Inside Out Mktg & Web Sltns James, Ashley G James, Terry Moore, Jerry 0 Renshaw, John Zufic, Tino Abreu, John Boudreau, Brad City of Chehalis Helpenstell, Brooke Helpenstell, Scott Hert, Richard F Johnson', Stephen Mason, Dawn O'Hara, Patricia Peterson, Brenda N Port Angeles City Treasurer Rooney, Randy L Serrianne, Michael D Smith, Parker Stone, Richard SuperValu Cash & Carry Ul in, Bradley V Wilson, Donald L 208 0002 73156 Bank of New York 211 0002 CHECK REGISTER Date From 10/26/2002 To 11/08/2002 Vendor Number 05253 09152 10244 10246 13696 18470 26225 01530 02668 03710 08547 08539 08173 10241. 13717 15228 16616 03062 18462 19808 19933 19872 23016 21110 23636 02175 310 0007 73023 Washington (DOT), State of 23119 73066 Lakeside Industries Inc 12036 73076 McCain Traffic Supply 13286 73159 Builders Exchange of WA Inc 02609 73182 Federal Express Corp 06022 879442686 Lakeside Industries Inc 12036 0008 72977 ARC Architects 01078 Descr'iption Officiate Soccer League NW Games logo Officiate Soccer League Officiate Soccer League Officiate Soccer League Officiate Soccer League Officiate Soccer League Officiate Tipoff Tournament Officiate Tipoff Tournament Refund 2 entry fees Score Tipoff Tournament Score Tipoff Tournament Officiate Tipoff Tournament Officiate BB tournament Score basketball tournament Score Tipoff Tournament Score Tipoff Tournament Film processing-Cole Officiate Tipoff Tournament Officiate Tipoff Tournament Officiate Soccer League Officiate Tipoff Tournament Cups,cocoa Officiate BB tournament Officiate Tipoff Tournament November 12 2002 GL,Code Number 851 4150 852 4150 851 4150 851 4150 851 4150 851 4150 851 4150 852 4150 852 4150 852 34760021 852 4150 852 4150 852 4150 852 4150 852 4150 8524150 852 4150 852 3101 852 4150 852 4150 851 4150 852 4150 854 3101 852 4150 852 4150 Total for Recreational Activities Fund Admin fee-PORANGL*D211 Admin fee-PORELEREF01 292 4150 Total for Ll.D. Control Fund 298 4150 Total for 2001 GO Bond Refunding Engineering services Engineering services 2002 Paving program pmt 2 Audible Pedestrian signal I St/Lauridsen Blvd sidewalk October shipping charges 2002 Paving program pmt 1 Professional svcs pe 09-25 76 792 4150 792 4150 792 4150 792 6510 792 4410 792 4210 792 4150 Total for PubLic Works 891 4150 TotaL for Parks & Recreation TotaL for CapitaL Improvement Fund Page 6 . Amount 100.00 300.00 37.50 37.50 25.00 50.00 200.00 160.00 140.00 195.00 40.00 100.00 120.00 250.00 110.00 40.00 80.00 17.99 140.00 160.00 10. 16 9.20 250.00 160.00 3,378.72 173 . 98 173.98 303.50 303.50 2,441.60 100.,46 15,205.00 14,705.61 24.84 7.45 256,528.52 289,013.48 6. 652.85 289,666.33 1---- 02/11/12-08:26 . FndDpt Check Number 327 0007 . 0009 . City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE November 12 2002 Page 7 Vendor Name 73195 Hoch Construction Inc 73217 Olympic Design Works Inc PS 73247 us Bank 73027 EES Consulting Inc 73029 Washington (Unemp), St~te of 73030 Equi fax 73054 Ireland, David H 73087 National Assn Purchasing Mgmt 73089 New View Inc 73091 Northwest Public Power Assn 731q1 PUD #1 of Clallam County CHECK REGISTER Date From 10/26/2002 To 11/08/2002 Vendor Number 08066 15193 21029 05140 23178 05160 09133 14494 14535 14013 16038 73110 Puget Safety Equipment Inc 16248 73111 Qwest 21001 73114 RadioShack Accounts Receivable 18003 73122 Sanderson Safety Supply Co 19048 73126 Shotwell Corp, Jonathan 19019 73161 Business Answerphone Service 02166 73164 CEO/Consolidated Elec Oist Inc 03267 73168 CliniCare of Port Angeles Inc 03080 73174 Day-Timers Inc 04040 73177 Diversified Resource Center 04052 73182 Federal Express Corp 06022 73223 Parsinen Landscape Maint Inc 16258 73229 Quill Corporation 17000 Description GL Code Amount Number Calinegie Library,Revital ize 796 6510 46,401.66 Professional services 796 4150 4,630.10 Retainage-153591659518-Hoch 796 6510 8,629.53 Total for Carnegie Library 59,661.29 Rfd utility deposit-011860012 401 2391200 250.00 Rfd utility deposit-123013004 401 2131100 250.00 Traffic meter boxes 401 1411000 24.51 Utility deposit rfd-045829002 401 2391200 178.91 Utility deposit rfd-124247011 401 2391200 65.47 Utility ovrpmt rfd-050997034 401 1222400 47.95 Utility deposit rfd-091456036 401 2391200 47.73 Pens 401 2370000 1.40- Ink cartridges,pads 401 2370000 10.29- Portfolios,bubble wrap 401 2370000 3.60- Utility deposit rfd-086363002 401 2391200 250.00 Utility deposit rfd-004758024 401 2391200 95.99 Anchors,clamps,cartridges 401 1414000 981.00 Anchors,clamps;cartridges 401 1411000 432.62 Wire tap connections 401 1411000 138.96 Total for Department 2,747.85 WPAG 2002 pe 09-30 914 4901 963.91 3rd Qtr Unemployment 911 2060 6,944.00 Credit inquiries, fees 911 4150 32.27 Reimburse mileage 911 4310 58.50 Membership dues-Smith 2003 911 4310 125.00 Rfd UG installation overpmt 911 39700000 62.74 . Responder refresher-Ireland 911 4310 195.00 10-15 bi II ing SR101 .& Eucl id 911 3350 18.49 10-25 billing-Lauridsen Blvd 911 3350 21.82 10-29 billing-2110 Glass Rd 911 3350 78.49 Plugs 911 3120 52.40 Heat packs 911 3120 67,76 Wire 911 3120 83.86 10-14 Qwest billing 911 4210 324.62 10-14 Qwest billing 911 4210 40.65 Surge protector 911 3101 43.27 Gas cal ibrator 911 3120 343.35 Concrete 930 4810 64.92 Concrete rubble 911 4810 162.30 November service 911 4810 160.00 Cap 911 3402 8.79 DOT physical-Strait 911 4310 72.00 Calendar refills,blank pages 911 3101 34.10 Janitorial services-October 911 4810 175.10 October shipping charges 930 4810 5.55 L~cape maintenance-Oct 911 4810 1,297.42 Pens 911 3101 18.39 02/11/12-08:26 City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE November 12 2002 Page 8 CHECK REGISTER Date From 10/26/2002 To 11/08/2002 . Fnd Opt Check Vendor Vendor Descr'i pt i on GL Code Amount Number Name Number Number Ink cartridges,pads 911 3101 135.74 Portfolios,bubble wrap 911 3101 47.52 73241 Shay, James 19836 Reimburse CDL endorsement 911 4310 20.00 73257 Xerox Corporation 24001 DC220SS lease-September 911 4530 2n.97 73258 Zee Medical Service Co 26005 Towel,earplugs,iodine 911 3120 105.87 Total for Light 12,041.80 Total for Li ght Fund 14,789.65 402 72987 American ~ater ~orks Assoc 01066 Distribution handbook 402 2370000 10.99- 73135 US Filter Distribution Group 210n Fire hydrant barrels 402 1414000 486.92 Fire hydrant barrels 402 1411000 101.38 73181 Familia'n N~ 06020 Traffic meter boxes 402 1414000 298.90 73185 Fowler Company, H 0 06110 Setters with by-pass 402 1414000 1,967.08 Setters with by-pass 402 1411000 167.20 Total for Department 3,010.49 0007 72972 ADS Equipment Inc 01003 Parts for check valve 754 3120 411.42 72979 AT&T Business Service 01085 10-15 AT&T a/c 0584912554001 753 4210 4~. 72987 American ~ater ~orks Assoc 01066 Distribution handbook 753 3101 14l. 73002 Brown and Caldwell 02057 PA ~ projects pe 09-27 794 4150 23,248.87 73037 Flow Products Inc 06125 Diaphrams 754 3501 148.60 73041 Grainger Inc, ~ ~ 07015 Drill bit set 754 3101 195.84 Mobile plan center 754 3101 545.64 73096 Olympic Chemical Corporation 15117 Sodium bisulfite 754 3120 ' 1,288.96 73101 PUD #1 of Clallam County 16038 10-22 billing-Crown Z ~ater Rd 753 4710 12.46 73110 Puget Safety Equipment Inc 16248 Gloves 754 3120 45.93 73111 Qwest 21001 10-14 Qwest billing 754 4210 46.37 10-14 Qwest billing 753 4210 23.19 10-16 Qwest billing 754 4210 57.42 10-20 Qwest billing 754 4210 57.42 10-20 Qwest billing 754 4210 57.42 10-20 Qwest billing 754 4210 57.42 10-20 Qwest billing 754 4210 57.42 10-20 Qwest billing 754 4210 57.42 10-20 Qwest billing 754 4210 57.42 10-23 Qwest billing 753 4210 64.15 10-23 Qwest billing 754 4210 57.42 10-23 Qwest billing 754 4210 57.42 10-23 Qwest billing 754 4210 57.42 10-20 Qwest billing 754 4210 40.75 10-10 Qwest billing 753 4210 514.60 73119 Ryan Herco Products Corp 18216 Valves,couplings 753 3120 95.39 Pump assembly 753 3120 5~. 73123 Sears Commercia~ One 19109 Toolset 753 3120 73129 TEC (Treatment Equipment Co) 20259 Rental of GAC units-November 793 6510 639.74 73133 TransfacFunding Corporation 20059 Shipping chgs-Oly Foundry 754 3120 48.88 73137 Verizon ~ireless - Bellevue 01105 1q7~ Verizon billing 753 4210 27.32 10-1 Verizon billing 754 4210 21.91 02/11/12-08:26 . Fnd Dpt Check Number . 404 . City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE November 12 2002 CHECK REGISTER Date From 10/26/2002 To 11/08/2002 Vendor Name Vendor Number 73159 Builders Exchange of YA Inc 02609 73166 Cascade Container-Fab Company 03709 73167 Clallam Cnty Div of Env Health 03066 73174 Day-Timers Inc 04040 73177 Diversified Resource Center 04052 73178 Economic & Engineering Svc Inc 05004 { 73181 Familian NY 06020 73182 Federal Express Corp 06022 73188 GRCC/YW 07026 73190 Geotivity Inc 07375 73201 Lakeside Industries Inc 12036 73212 Metrocall 20000 73218 Olympic Foundry Inc 15239 73226 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 73245 Thurman supply 20005 ", 73121 Safety Vision LP 19931 0007 72979 72990 73048 73102 73111 73113 73121 73141 731n 73202 AT&T Business Service Automotive Environmental svc Hill Materials Inc, Fred Parametrix Inc 01085 01041 08551 16155 Qwest Radio Pacific Inc Safety Vision LP YORC-YA Organic Recycling Cncl Diversified Resource Center Landscapes Northwest 21001 11019 19931 23486 04052 12178 Description / GL Code Number 10-~5 Verizon billing 754 4210 Front St water line 793 4410 Door seal,installation strips 7543120 Yater testing 753 4810 Compact filler,appt schedule 754 3101 Book cover 754 3101 Janitorial services-October 753 4810 Yater/Sewer Rate Study-Sept 753 4150 Yater/Sewer Rate Study-'Sept 754 4150 Elbows,unions,flanges 754 3120 October shipping charges 753 4810 October shipping charges 794 4210 October shipping charges 793 4210 October shipping charges 753 4810 October shipping, charges 7544210 Drinking Yater Yrkshp-Becker 753 4310 Site inspections 794 4810 Asphal t 753 3402 Asphalt 753 3402 Asphalt 753 3402 10-26 Metrocall billing 754 4210 Beehive grate 754 3120 Ice,cups-Young 754 3101 Fixture tubes, test clips,bulbs 753 3120 Clamps 753 3120 Tape,paste,clamps 754 3120 Couplings 754 3120 Plug, fasteners 754 3120 Primer,cement,paste 7533120 Total for Public Yorks Total for Yater/Yastewater Fund Rear vision kit 404 2370000 Total for Department 10-06 AT&T a/c 0512527756001 Antifreeze processing Basalt LF Engineering 2002 pe 09-27 LF Engineering 2002 pe 09-27 LF Engineering 2002 pe 09-27 LF Engineering 2002 pe 09-27 10-14 Qwest billing Fair mini remotes Rear vision kit Membership renewal-Young J~~rial services-October Install landfill landscape 755 4210 755 4810 755 4150 755 4150 795 4150 795 4150 795 4150 755 4210 755 4410 755 4810 755 4901 755 4810 755 3120 Page 9 Amount 12.43 22.n 134.92 n1. 00 32.44 3.41 n.83 , 2,600.00 2,578.35 1,604.54 12.25 7.10 7.10 33.05 63.50 25.00 1,200.00 169.22 78.99 82.54 33.66 114.78 ,6.10 53.86 18.70 40.21 4.37 7.05 67.19 38,647.31 41,657.80 102.79- 102.79- 33.96 100.00 287.25 4,640.08 3,389.09 379.11 2,267.89 115.93 280.00 1,356.37 200.00 194.54 4,628.99 02/11/12-08:26 City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE November 12 2002 Page 10 CHECK REGISTER Date From 10/26/2002 To 11/08/2002 . Fnd Dpt Check Number Vendor Name Vendor Number Description GL Code Number Amount 73219 Overa II Laundry Services Inc 15234 Laundry services 755 3120 11.11 Laundry services 755 3120 11.11 Laundry services 755 3120 11.11 Laundry services 755 3120 11.11 Laundry services 755 3120 11.11 Laundry services 755 3120 11.11 Laundry services 755 3120 . 11.11 Laundry services 755 3120 12.20 73223 Parsinen Landscape Maint Inc 16258 Landscape maintenance-Oct 755 4150 1,537.42 73226 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 First Aid Refreshment-McCabe 755 4310 17.67 73248 USDA APHIS Wildlife Services "21069 Wildlife Hazards July-Sept 755 4150 13,294.07 Total for Public Works 32,812.34 Total for Sol id Waste Fund 32,709.55 411 0009 73156 Bank of New York 02175 Admin fee-PORANGELE95 912 4150 197.55 Total for 92 & 95 Lt. Rev.Bds/Dbt. Servo 197.55 421 0009 72984 Adam, Maria M R0514 City rebate program 913 4986 9~. 72985 All Weather Heating & Cool ing 01060 City rebate program-ThomPson 913 4986 2,450. 72989 Archuleta, Jesse R0513 City rebate program 913 4986 246.00 72992 Bai ley, Matthew R0532 City rebate program 913 4986 50.00 72996 Bible, Charles H R0515 City rebate program 913 4986 150.00 73007 Canter, Carol L R0516 City rebate program 913 4986 150.00 73008 Carroll, Sylvia R0517 City rebate program 913 4986 75.59 City rebate program 913 4986 32.27 73009 Christensen, Nancy R0518 City rebate program 913 4986 150.00 73015 Clark, James R0519 City rebate program 913 4986 50.00 73017 Cl imate Crafters 03658 City rebate program-Graves 913 4986 25.00 73021 Delguzzi, Virginia R0520 City rebate program 913 4986 30.00 73024 Dopp, Gwen R0521 City rebate program 913 4986 50.00 73040 Glass Services Co Inc 07037 City rebate program-Kettel 913 4986 1,065.00 73044 Hahn, Leroy R0533 City rebate program 913 4986 36.00 73046 Helwick, Vicki R0179 City rebate program 913 4986 43.27 73047 Higginbotham, Joy R0522 City rebate program 913 4986 50.00 73063 Kiele, Carole and Stephen R0523 City rebate program 913 4986 42.00 73067 Lepak, Gary R0524 City rebate program 913 4986 50.00 73068 Lindberg, Judith 12377 City rebate program 913 4986 50.00 73070 Lingvall, Keith R0526 City rebate program 913 4986 50.00 73071. Loska, Tonya R0525 City rebate program 913 4986 36.00 73073 MacLeod, Carol R0341 City rebate program 913 ,4986 150.00 73074 Mathews Glass Co Inc 13107 City rebate-Baertschiger 913 4986 240.00 73079 Mertz, M A R0527 City rebate program 913 4986 36.00 73082 Miller, Ian .' R0111 City rebate program 913 4986 2~. 73086 Mt Angeles Boys & Girls Club R0536 City rebate program 913 4986 73095 Olmstead, Justin R0528 City rebate program 913 4986 100.00 73103 Pershing Motel R0529 City rebate program 913 4986 1,946.14 73105 Phipps, John A R0534 CEr()rebate program 913 4986 150.00 73115 Reichl, El ise R0535 CIty rebate program 913 4986 50.00 02/11/12-08:26 City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE November 12 2002 Page 11 . CHECK REGISTER Date From 10/261?002 To 11/08/2002 Fnd. Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount Number Name Number Number 73118 Ridout, Ken 18011 Ci~y rebate prog~8m 913 4986 50.00 73145 Wollen, Keith R0530 City rebate. program 913 4986 50.00 73146 Worley, Robert R0531 Ci.ty rebate program 913 4986 25.00 73152 Air Flo Heating Company Inc 01012 City rebate program-McGovern 913 4986 2,240.00 City rebate program-Evans 913 4986 2,450.00 73162 C & F Insulation 03102 City rebate program-Johnson 913 4986 1,185.00 City rebate program-Gal lagan 91.3 4986 1,060.50 City rebate-China First 9134986 7,091.25 City rebate program-Whalley 913 4986 5,805.00 City rebate program-Darrow 913 4986 3,322.03 City rebate program-Elliott 913 .4986 2,057.70 73173 Dave's Heating & Cooling Svc 04393 City rebate program"Brown 913 4986 2,450.00 73180 Everwarm Hearth & Home Inc 05013 City rebate program-Coville 913 4986 1,786.50 City rebate program-Coville 913 4986 522.50 73191 Glass Services Co Inc 07037 City rebate program-Phillips 913 4986 900.00. City rebate program-King 913 4986 475 .00 City rebate program-Agren 913 4986 465.00 73209 Mathews Glass Co Inc 13107 City rebate program-Barrett 913 4986 87.50 City rebate program-Pastore 913 4986 178.90 . Total for Conservation Fund 40,137.32 501 73077 McMaster-Carr Supply Co 13202 Patch cable assembly 501 2370000 1.03- 73104 Pettit Oil Company 16302 Diesel 501 1412000 110.35 Diesel 501 1412000 3,402.72 Gasol ine 501 1412000 3,413.80 Diesel 501 1412000 1,682.78 Diesel 501 1412000 365.29 Diesel 501 1412000 78.11 Total for Department 9,052.02 0007 72978 ASM Signs 01405 White vinyl circles 760 3101 122.70 72980 AT&T Wireless Services 01404 10-02 AT&T alc 46204277 760 4210 15~43 73001 Brim Tractor Company Inc 02556 Install loader bucket 760 6410 9,790.00 Bearing 760 3402 83.61 73003 Schuck's Auto Parts 19008 Floor mats 760 3402 140.55 73018 Coastline Tractor Co Inc 03082 Hanmer knife 760 3402 392.80 73043 H & R Parts & Equipment Inc 08045 Core, parts 760 3402 35.52 Damper, thermostat 760 3402 179.22 73057 Jesse's Auto Salon 10262 Vehicle detailing 760 4810 150.00 Vehicle detailing 760 4810 150.00 73062 Kaman Industrial Technologies 11082 Chrome ball,freight 760 3402 13.50 Heavy duty inner race 162020 760 3402 21. 10 Inner races 760 3402 66.96 . Bearing cones,bearing cups 760 3402 181.38 73064 Koenig Chevrolet Oldsmobile 11018 Fan belt 760 3402 117 .46 73077 McMaster-Carr Supply Co 13202 Patch cable assembly 760 3402 13.53 73078 McPherson Emerg Veh Srvc Ctr 13493 Door assembly 760 3402 369.15 ESotmet,fender welding, latch 760 3402 119.28 Shipping for inv 23803,23792 760 3402 6.07 02/11/12-08:26 City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE CHECK REGISTER Oate From 10/26/2002 To 11/08/2002 Fnd Dpt Check Number Vendor Name Vendor Number 73090 Northend Truck Equipment Inc 14181 73092 Novus Windshield Repair 14206 73098 Overall Laundry Services Inc 15234 73111 Qwest 21001 73127 Snap-on Tools - Chugger Deane 19108 73165 Schuck's Auto Parts 19008 73170 Copy Cat Graphics 03380 73177 Diversified Resource Center 04052 73197 Jennings Equipment Inc 10151 73204 Les Schwab TireCtr-Solid Waste 19755 73213 N C'Machinery Co 14001 73219 Overall Laundry Services Inc 73225 Pettit Oil Company 15234 16302 Description Ford dual wheel truck Windshield Labor Laundry services Mat,coveralls Laundry services 10-14 Qwest billing Condenser fin,pliers Floor mats Cassette player,speakers Cassette player warranty Remove old decals Janitorial services-October Mower blades Mower blades Radial truck casing Radial truck casing Tire Tire Tire Flat repair,mount Flat repair Valves Credit core deposit Turbo charger, co're deposit Laundry services EQ7 diesel-October EQ9 gas-October EQ14 gas-October EQ15 gas-October EQ18 gas-October EQ23 gas-October EQ27 gas-October EQ28 gas-October EQ29 gas-October' EQ30 gas-October EQ40 gas-October EQ41 gas-October EQ42 gas-October EQ43 gas-October EQ44 gas-October EQ45 gas-October EQ46 gas-October EQ47 gas-October EQ48 gas-October EQ53 gas-October EQ54 gas-October EQ65 gas-October EQ66 gas-October ~ gas-October EQ78 gas-October November 12 2002 GL Code Number 760 6410 760 3402 760 4810 760 3402 760 3402 760 3402 760 4210 760 3501 760 3402 760 3402 760 3402 760 4810 760 4810 760 3402 760 3402 760'3402 ,760 3402 760 3110 760 3110 760 3110 760 4810 760 4810 760 3402 7603402 760 3402 760 4990 760 3211 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 760 3210 Page 12 . Amount 12,195.40 341.44 37.87 49.96 49.96 49.96 23.19 52.15 28.11 87.36 91.96 135.25 116.70 158.08 158.08 75.74 75.74 160.46 160.46 1~~ 3;. 4.87 972.36- 1,925.67 49.96 34.00 30.25 15.81 59.90 57.36 27.84 33.95 41.58 27.02 61.21 27.28 67.29 42.20 165.19 88.68 112.87 87.10 118.76 89.09 :. 20.68 140.65 217.39 53.74 r--- 02/11/12-08:26 City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE November 12 2002 Page 13 . CHECK REGISTER Date From 10/26/2002 To 11/08/2002 Fnd Dpt Check Vendor Vendor Description GL Code Amount Number Name Number Number EQ80 gas-October 760 3210 115.03 EQ81 gas-October 760 3210 83.51 EQ82 gas-October 760 3210 66.91 EQ83 gas-October 760 3210 175 .97 EQ84 gas-October 760 3210 152.97 EQ85 gas-October 760 3210 45.09 EQ86 gas-October 760 3210 53.22 EQ87 gas-October 760 3210 130.66 EQ88 gas-October 760 3210 82.43 EQ89 gas-October 760 3210 160.20 EQ90 gas-October. 760 3210 42.79 EQ95 gas-October 760 3210 63.05 EQ96 gas-October 760 3210 63.42 EQ131 diesel-October 760 3211 16.48 EQ138 gas-October 760 3210 100.90 EQ147 gas-October 760 3210 24.48 EQ151 gas-October 760 3210 32.82 73226 Port Angeles City Treasurer 03062 License,registration-Burrett 760 4520 13.25 73227 Port Angeles Ford Lincoln 16158 Running board kit. 760 3402 309.53 . 73245 Thurman Supply 20005 Stripper,staking tool 760 3501 25.97 73250 United Parcel Service 21005 Shipping charges-October 760 3402 6.80 Total for Public ~orks 30,820.55 Total for Equipment Services Fund 39,872.57 502 0002 73025 Dungeness Commctn & Design 04210 September website maintenance 250 4150. 303.75 73052 Insight Direct Inc 09085 Cables 250 3160 363.56 73111 Qwest 21001 10-14 Qwest billing 250 4210 69.56 73250 United Parcel Service 21005 Shipping charges-October 250 4210 100.29 Total for Information Technology Fund 837.16 503 0001 72981 AWC Employee Benefits Trust 01231 November medical premium 121 4630 82,659.16 November life ins premium 121 4632 1,427.92 November retirees premium 121 4634 5,583.35 72991 Bailey, Jim 02567 Reimb Medicare premium-Nov 121 4635 50.00 72993 Balser, Fred 02243 Reimb Medicare premium-Nov 121 4635 45.50 72997 Bishop, Virgil 02019 Reimb Medicare premium-Nov 121 4635 94.00 73004 Cameron, Kenneth 03252 Reimb Medicare premium-Nov 121 4635 80.00 73006 Camporini, Richard 03273 Reimb Medicare premium-Nov 121 4635 50.00 73034 Fasola, Cindy 06272 Settlement of claim #02-40 119 4999 973.80 73042 Grooms, Michael E 07187 .Reimb Medicare premium-Nov 121 4635 54.00 73045 Healthcare Mgt Admnstrs Inc 08492 September dental premium 117 4601 1,656.00 . November dental premium 117 4601 1,692.80 73058 Johnson, Donald G 10052 Reimb Medicare premium-Nov 121 4635 50.00 73059 Johnson, Harry 10047 Reimb Medicare premium-Nov 121 4635 54.00 73061 Jorissen, Robert R 10013 Reimb Medicare premium-Nov 121 4635 54.00 73069 Lindley, James K 12019 Reimb Medicare premium-Nov 121 4635 54.00 73072 Loucks, Jasper 12186 15i~ Medicare premium-Nov 121 4635 85.00 73081 Mi esel, Phil 13261 Reimb Medicare premium-Nov 121 4635 46.10 02/11/12-08:26 City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE Fnd Dpt Check Number Vendor Name 73085 Morgan, Roy 73124 Senters, David 73125 Sequim Aquatic Recreation Ctr 73128 Sweatt, Johnnie 73132 Thompson, Bruce 73144 Wheeler, R J 73169 Connelly, Susanne 73176 Dept of Labor & Industries 73183 Fitness West I Inc 73186 Fox, Kenneth 73211 McLane, Steve 73214 NW Admin Transfer Acct 73220 Owens, Annette 73233 Rainier EAP/Mike Walling_ 73237 Riepe, Tom 73246 UNUM Life Ins Co of America 73254 Ward. Dennis H 889459277 Healthcare Mgt Admnstrs Inc 602 0002 72981 AWC Employee Benefits Trust 72999 Braun, Gary 73005 Campbell, Malcolm D 73031 Evans, Sidney 73120. Ryan, Ed 73179 Evans, Sidney 650 73107 Port Angeles Downtown Assn 652 0008 72986 American Assn of Museums 73111 Qwest 73222 Paint Store, The 73231 Qwest 698 72973 AFSCME Local 1619 72974 AFSCME Local 1619 73028 Employees Association CHECK REGISTER Date From 10/26/2002 To 11/08/2002 Vendor Number 13145 19932 19015 19146 20083 23683 03690 04046 06306 06191 13000 14169 15082 18057 18081 21000 23680 08492 01231 02173 03045 05103 18034 05103 16024 01226 21001 16064 21001 01152 01153 05041 Description Relmb Medicare pr~mium-Nov Wellness event-Honorarium Annual Family Pass-Dunbar Reimb Medicare premium"Nov Reimb Medicare premium-Nov Claim settlement #02-40 Reimburse wellness meal Worker's comp-3rd quarter Membership-Money 609600473 Disability board claims Disability board claims Nonsworn grp-Nov premium Sworn officers-Nov premium Retirees-November premium Reimburse medical expenses EAP services-October Disability board claims Admin November premh.lll Police/IBEW November premium Disability board claims 10-22 Weekly claims pd by EFT ;0"29 Weekly claims pd EFT November 12 2002 GL Code Number 121 4635 121 4150 121 4150 121 4635 121 4635 119 4999 121 4150 118 4950 121 4150 121 4635 121 4635 121 4633' 121 4633 121 4634 121 4630 121 4150 121 4635 121 4631 121 4631 121 4635 117 4601 117 4601 Total for Self - Insurance Fund Nov firemens pension premium Reimb Medicare premium-Nov Reimb Medicare premium-Nov Reimb Medicare premium-Nov Reimb Medicare premium-Nov Disability board claims 225 4635 225 4635 225 4635 225 4635 225 4635 225 4635 Total for Firemen's Pension Fund Disburse funds Disburse funds Disburse funds 650 2290000 650 2319100 650 2319200 Total for Off - Street Parking Fund Renew membership-Senuik 10-14 Qwest billing 10-23 Qwest billing Paint,brushes 10-14 Qwest billing 868 4901 868 4210 868 4210 868 3101 868 4210 Total for Esther Webster Trust Fund Payroll deductions pe 10-27 Pftltll deductions pe 10-27 Payroll deductions pe 10-27 698 2315200 698 2315200 698 2315210 Page 14 . Amount 54.00 65.00 522.50 65.70 50.00 775.25 104.83 14,533.91 584.28 69.07 164.51 14,117.20 18,748.05 8,528.45 . 46.72 330.00 128.25 1,191.94 1,062.24 65~ 45 1,668. 158,041.53 2,274.75 54.00 54.00 45.50 54.00 142.26 2,624.51 5,000.00 3,000.00 12,000.00 20,000.00 110.00 23.19 60.50 71.46 42.19 30. 86.00 172.00 352.00 r 02/11/12-08:26 . FndDpt Check Number . . City of Port Angeles - LIVE MACHINE November 12 2002 Page 15 CHECK REGISTER Date From 10/26/~002 To 11/08/2002 Vendor Name Vendor Number Description GL Code Number Amount 73035 Firefighter's Local 656 06076 Pay,ro II deductions pe 10-27 698 2315200 1,100.00 73036 Flex-Plan Services (Payroll) 06062 Payroll deductions pe 10-27 698 2315210 890.65 73049 IBEW Local 997 09034 Payroll deductions pe 10-27 698 2315200 603.00 73053 Internal Revenue Service Ctr 09150 Payroll deductions pe 10-27 698 2315210 25.00 73093 Office of Support Enforcement 15072 Payroll deductions pe 10-27 698 2315210 1,328.03 73094 Office of Support Enforcement 15166 Payroll deductions pe 10-27 698 2315210 169.85 73099 PERS 16016 October contribution 698 2315130 385.64 73106 Police Association 16156 Payroll deductions pe 10-27 698 2315210 247.00 73130 Teamsters Local 589 20056 Payroll deductions pe 10-27 698 2315200 2,388.00 73134 US Department of Education 21075 Payroll deductions pe 10-27 698 2315210 69.41 73136 United Way (payroll) 21028 Payroll deductions pe 10-27 698 2315240 383.48 73142 WSCCCE AFSCME AFL-CIO 23167 Payroll deductions pe 10-27 698 2315~00 3,156.05 73143 DiMartino/WSCFF Disability 06052 Payroll deductions pe 10-27 698 2315190 875.78 73221 PERS 16016 October contribution 698 2315130 468.76 Total for Accounts Payable Clearing Fund 12,700.65 Grand Total 837,798.08 85 . . . Finance Department Electronic Payments October 26,2002 - November 08, 2002 Fund 209 11-01-02 Bank of New York Debt Service - Fire Station 92,475.00 210 11-01-02 Bank of New York Debt Service - Library 213,897.50 415 11-01-02 Bank of New York Debt Service - WW Bonds 486,248.75 206 11-01-02 Bank of New York Debt Service - Sr Center 129.033.75 Total 921,655.00 C: \ WINNT\Profiles\Administrator\Personal\ Wires. wpd 87 . . . 88 . ~ORTANGELES WASHINGTON CITY COUNCIL MEMO u.S. A. DATE: November 19,2002 To: MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities t>0<.r SUBJECT: Amendment No.3 to Consultant Agreement, Port Angeles International Gateway Summary: An amendment is required to the consultant agreement with the architecfure firm of . Merritt + Pardini to provide additional architectural and engineering services, to include traffic signal improvements, signage, and a new Chamber of Commerce building, as part of the Port Angeles International Gateway Transportation Center Project 97-20. The original contract with Merritt + Pardini did not include the work tasks for the engineering of improvements to the downtown signals and traffic signage, or the architectural services required for the building to house the Chamber of Commerce. The signal and signage tasks were known at the start of design. It wasnot known as to whether the City, WSDOT, or others would perform the engineering. At this time, the City does not have the staf(~vailable for the design and WSDOT's estimated fee for the engineering was excessive. An acceptable scope and fee was negotiated with Parametrix, a subconsultant to Merritt + Pardini, for the Gateway project. Parametrix prepared the ordinal study for the multi modal center and downtown area and has engineers on board that are familiar with the project. The traffic signals and signage improvements were included in the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) grant portion ofthe project. The estimated engineering fees are $42,350 for improvement of the downtown traffic signals (7), and $19,000 for the signage improvements. . A new task for architectural services to provide a preliminary design and construction cost estimate for a building to house the Chamber of Commerce was requested by the City. This is needed to determine if the building can be constructed with the Gateway project so as to benefit from the economies of inclusion and avoid the disruptions of being constructed later. The building has been discussed with the Chamber from the beginning oftheproject. The Federal Transit Authority (FTA) grant will cover a portion of the utility work and the public restrooms, and it may also cover additional portions of the building. This is being discussed with the FT A. Chamber building costs 89 November 19, 2002 City Council RE: Amendment No.3, P.A. International Gateway Page 2 not covered by FTA will need to be funded by the City or others. The estimated fee to provide the preliminary design and construction cost estimate is $5,000.00. Once this work is completed and an agreement with the Chamber is obtained, the final design costs and funding sources will be defined and a new contract amendment will b~ brought to Council for consideration. . The Gateway Review Committee supports the work associated with the traffic signals and signage. Funding for the preliminary design and construction cost estimate for the Chamber building will be taken from general fund reserves. . . N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Gateway Amndment 3.wpd 90 . . . . . . DATE: To: FROM: SUBJECT: ~ORTANGELES WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO NOVEMBER 19, 2002 MAYOR DOYLE AND CITY COUNCIL . . / YVONNE ZIOMKOWSKI, FINANCE DIRECTOR 0....' PROPERTY TAX LEVY ORDINANCES Summary: ,The City is required to certify property taxes by Ordinance and to submit the levy to the County Commissioners. Recommendation: The Finance Department recommends that the City Council approve the proposed general and special (voted) property tax levies and approve a one percent increase in the general tax levy plus any new construction. . Background / Analysis: On November 5,2001, the voters passed Initiative 747 which imposed a limit of one percent on property tax increases. Therefore, in complying with the voters decision, property taxes have been increased by only one percent. A public hearing on this issue and other revenue sources was held at the November 5, 2002, Council meeting. This is a preliminary ordinance based on information currently available to the City. Staffis waiting for the assessed valuation of new construction from the County Assessor's office. We hope to have a revised ordinance available at the Council meeting. 91 ORDINANCE NO. . AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, authorizing a 1 % increase in the regular property tax levy plus an)f, increase res~lting from new construction, and other specified increases in assessed valuation determining and fixing the amount to be raised by ad valorem taxes for the fiscal year 2003, and directing the City Clerk to certify said amount to the Board of Clallam County Commissioners. WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 84.55.120, the City of Port Angeles has properly given notice of a public hearing held November 5, 2002, to consider revenue sources for the City's current expense budget for the year 2003; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after such hearing and after duly considering relevant evidence and factors, has determined that there is a need for an increase in the regular property tax levy, in addition to any amou~t. resulting from the addition of new construction, . improvements to property, annexations, and any increase in the value of state-assessed' property, in order to discharge the expected expenses and obligations of the City and as may otherwise be in the City's best interest; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.33.135, the City Manager is required to provide the City Council with current information on estimates of revenues from all sources as adopted in the current budget, together with estimates submitted by the Finance Director, for consideration of the City's total anticipated financial requirements for the ensuing fiscal year, and the City Council is required to determine and fix by ordinance the amount to be levied by ad valorem taxes; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 84.52.020, the City Clerk is required to certify the amount of ad valorem taxes to be levied to the Board of Clallam County Commissioners; . NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES 92 -' Laurel Street Slide Repair Status Report City Council Meeting November 19, 2002 Project Justification · City right-of-way · Protection of: - Fountain area - Alley way - Electric utility lines Chronology of Events · Slide - 1998 · Project funded - 2000 · Architect selection - April 2000 - Architectural vs. Engineering approach · Scope reduction (stairs deleted), April 2001 - Cost Estimate Increases · Architect released Chronology of Events · In house prepared contract awarded - Sept 2001 · Change order revision authorized but not executed Feb 2002 · Geologist consultant services June 2002 · Design revisions/Cost negotiations Sept 2002 [' "IS laJmq ._-.._-_.~- I (I) 5 'Ul;: Q) rfJ-C 0:::: 0.5 o 1- a.. '~----_._-_.,.__.,---- '~-,: ..-..---', , ',. SJ!elS r. ~~ __L__ '.-j--- . t:' ro 3 "0;;: Q) r tIJ:;:; o - CL5 o' .... n. I -_.._-~.~...~_.._----:--:-~--~~._-----'li .--.---- I. 106 ~!1> 96 8.5 so 75 76 65 50 5.5 50 4$ 40 M 30 25 o Gravel Path Anchor Anchor. /1' /oF I ,;/' I 1/..:; ;' . -"......;.. ~_. . ~, ~ .".~ .II! ') ... Ie ~ .n .l; ,I .. " 6 M b 1'4 ~ M Q "" e Ii) &l '" a f'- Q Ib <5 i'1I a o Fl E5 Fl Fl -....".--_._-----~------.,,----- --- Crry~~~L~~R ~:~'~-~-fcfsl----------~,-C'A~J: ---------J-----------.------------ ~-- -- ---....--------=----.-- --~ ~ ,-~x PtopC)fUtd 'Lour.1 FhtUlif'llng 'Well 88<l<tlon *~f:.ii;-i.-o-i\~ il/-i'/o2-- -- _-_--2-__.-__~___ -.--a8-O:itJion ?A~8f -.~_...._--- ~l1.e;eoui\ci~ Funding Challenges · Total Authorization $225,000 · Architect's Original Estimate $400,000+ - Alternates $240,000 to $360,000 · Deleted stairs/Staff design Sep 200 1 - Design/Contract Award $126,000 - Design problem: Wall proposed cannot meet structural requirements Funding Challenges ( continued) · Geologist proposes new wall design - Cost estimate. $150,000 - Contractors proposal $210,000 ' · Budget available $160,000 · Additional Funds Required $50,000 - Light Utility Reserves . Options · Do nothing & terminate contract · Rebid project · Construct upper wall only · Construct upper and lower wall 1-- . . . DA TE: To: FROM: SUBJECT: · pORTANGELES WAS H I N G TON, lJ. S. A. CITY COUNCIL l\1EMO November 19, 2002 MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities ty'v. W aterlW astewater Rate Study Summary: 'On November 5, 2002, Economic and Engineering Services (EES) presented their findings of the rate analysis for the water and wastewater utilities. A public hearing was opened to receive comments from customers along with input from City Council. Recommendation: Reopen the public hearing and adopt the attached ordinance revising water rates by 4% in 2003, 4% iilZ004, and 3% in 2005. Back2round / Analysis: On November 5, 2002, Economic and Engineering Services (EES) presented the rate analysis of the water and wastewater utilities. The analysis reviewed the revenue requirements, capital construction projeCts, and revenues over a six year period. To maintain the solvency of the water and wastewater fund, staff and EES recommend the following: . Rate increases in the water utility of 4% starting January 1, 2003, 4% starting January 1, 2004, and 3% starting January 1, 2005. · No rate increases for the wastewater utility. . Use of water/wastewater reserves in the amount of $2,100,000 over the three year rate period. . A revenue bond issue to cover about $2,700,000 in water capital projects and $1,100,000 for wastewater capital projects. Comments received during the first hearing on November 5,2002 and during the following week have not changed the recommendation of staff. The Utility Advisory Committee reviewed the analysis and its recommendations at their October 12, 2002 meeting. They recommended approval of the rate changes. It is recommended that the public hearing continue this evening and comments solicited from the public. If no significant comments are obtained, adopt the attached ordinance. Attachment: Ordinance 97 N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\Water wastewater rate adoption.wpd ORDINANCE NO. . AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, revising water rates and amending Ordinance 3029 as amended and Chapter 13.44 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Chapter 6 of Ordinance 2181, as most recently amended by Ordinance 3029, is hereby amended by amending Chapter 13.44 PAMC to read as follows: Sections: 13.44.010 13.44.020 13.44.025 13.44.030 13.44.040 13.44.050 13.44.055 13.44.060 13.44.070 13.44.080 13.44.090 Chapter 13 .44 WATER RATES Monthly Residential Flat Rate. Monthly Residential Metered Rate - Within City. Commercial and All Other Monthly Metered Rates. Monthly Industrial Metered Rate - Within City. Monthly Metered Rate - Outside City. Monthly Commercial Metered Rate - Outside the City. Resale Rate. Wholesale Rate. Rates - Temporary Water Use. Rates - Fire Protection. Service Charge. .. 13.44.010 Monthly Residential Flat Rate. The monthly residential flat rate for each service shall be as follows: A. $Z4-:t5 29.00 on bill~ beginning July, I, t998 2002. B $Z5:-H) 30.15 on bills beginning January 1, 20061. C. $ZT:-tB 31.40 on bills beginning January I, 200t1. D. $2-9:00 32.30 on bills beginning January 1, 2002~. 13.44.020 Monthly Residential Metered Rate - Within City. A. The following monthly customer charges are applicable to water service to single-family residences within the corporate limits ofthe City of Port Angeles. For the purposes of this section, "single-family residences" are defined as structures designed for occupancy by a. single family only, containing a complete kitchen unit. Structures which are not "single-family residences" include, but are not limited to, duplexes, fourplexes, apartments, and roominghouses. The charge is based upon size oftheservice line, and not size ofthe meter, except as specified for 98 _ I _ . the three-fourths-inch service below. The customer charges are as follows: Service Size Customer Charge Per Month On Bills Beginning On The Following Dates: 7/1/98 1/,1/02 1/1/00 111103 1/1/01 1/1/04 3/4-inch service (with 5/8-inchmeter) $-HT.T513.40 $-I-t:6e 13 .95 $tz:5514.50 3/4-inch service (with 3/4-inch meter) ++:6514.55 tz:6B15.15 +3:6615.75 I-inch service t3:B516.30 t-4-:t616.95 t5:ZB17.65 1 'l2-inch service 2-4:+530.15 Z6;te31.35 Z8:-t532.60 2-inch service 3-9-:7547.15 46:-9549.05 ' +t:e551.00 . 1/1/02 1/1/05 $B:-4e 14.95 t4:55 16.20 t6:3e 18.15 3&:t5 33.60 47:+5 , 52.55 B. Metered consumption shall b~ as follows: I. $:8:0 1.07 for each one hundred cubic feet consumed on bills beginning July 1, t996January 1. 2002. 2. $:93-llifor each one hundred cubic feet consumed on bills beginning January 1, 200e~. 3. $t:et 1.16 for each one hundred cubic feet consumed on bills beginning January 1, 200+1. 4. $t:e7 1.19for each one hundred cubic feet consumed on bills beginning January 1, 20OZ~. ", 13.44.025 Commercial and All Other Monthly Metered Rates. A. The following monthly customer charges are applicable to commercial and all other water services other than those provided for under Sections 13.44.010 through 13.44.040 of this Chapter, within the corporate limits ofthe City of Port AngeIes~ The customer charge is based upon size of the service line, and not tbe size of the meter, except as specified for three-fourths-inch service below. The customer charges are as follows: Service Size Customer Charge Per Month On Bills Beginning On The Following Dates: 7/1/981/1/02 1/1/001/1/03 1/1/011/1/04 . 3/4-inch service (with 5/8-inch meter) $+5:2519.05 $+6:4519.80 $t7-:tffi 20.60 99 _ 2 _ 1/1/02 1/1/05 $+9:-65 21.20 3/4-inch service (with 3/4-inch meter) +6:2520.30 +9:5521.10 +8-:9521.95 W:3e 22.60 . I-inch service +7:9522.40 +9:4623.30 2&:9524.25 ~ 24.95 1 Y2-inch service 3+:6539.50 34:Z641.lO 3-6:9642.70 39:56 44.00 2-inch service 4-8:+560.10 52-:0062.50 56:+565.00 6e:t6 66.95 3-inch service Str:451 07.90 93:35112.20 100.85116.70 107.90 120.20 4-inch service 141.35176.40 152.65183.45 164.85190.80 176.40 196.50 8-inch or lO-inch service 442.85552.70 478.30574.80 324.80375.85 347.50 387.15 516.55597.80 552.70. 615.75 6-inch service 278.45347.50 300.75361.40 B. Metered consumption shall be as follows: 1. $:9B .87for each one hundred cubic feet consumed on bills beginning July 1, 1996. January 1. 2002. 2. $:7-6 .90for each one hundred cubic feet consumed on bills beginning January 1, 20002. 3. $:8% .94for each one hundred cubic feet consumed on bills beginning January 1, 200t1. 4. $:87 .97for each one hundred cubic feet consumed on bills beginning January 1, 20022. 13.44.030 Monthlv Industrial Metered Rate -Within City. A. For the purposes of this section, "industrial customers" are defined as customers whose average monthly potable water consumption is in excess of three hundred fifty thousand cubic feet per month, where such average is computed by dividing total annual month period by twelve; provided, that this rate shall not apply to public wholesale customers ofthe City, whose rate shall be established by contract as set forth in PAMC 13.44.060. B. Metered consumption shall be as follows: . 1. $:64.80 for each one hundred cubic feet consumed on bills beginning July 1, 1998. January L 2002. 2. $:69.83 for each one hundred cubic feet consumed on bills beginning January 1,. 2006J. 1 00_ 3 _ r--- I 3. $:75.87 for each one hund~ed cubic feet consumed on bills beginning January I, 200+1. . 4. $78e.89 for each one hundredcubicfeet consumed on bills beginning January I, 20OZ~. . . . I,'" 13.44.040 Monthly Residential Metered Rate - Outside City. . A. The following monthly customer charges are applicable to water service outside the corporate limits of the City of Port Angeles. The charge is based upon size ofthe service line, and not size of the meter, except as specified for three-fourths-inch services below. The customer charges are as follows: Service Size Customer Charg.e Per Month On Bills Beginning On The Following Dates: 7/1/981/1/02 tftf001/1/03 1/1/011/1/04 3/4-inch service (with 5/8-inch meter) , $+6:+520.15 $+9-:4520.95 $+8-:8521. 7 5 3/4-inch service (with 3/4-inch meter) t7:5B21.85 +&:9622.70 Z6:4e23:65 . I-inch service t9:6e~4.45 2+:+525.45 ZZ:-8526.45 I ~-inch service %:2545.25 39:+547.05 4Z-::W48.95 2-inch service 56:6570.70 6+:2673.55 66:ffl76.45 I II /02 1/1/05 $Z6:t5 22.40 Zt-:H5 24.35 24:45 27.2~ 45:Z5 50.40 7f}:96 78.75 B. Metered consumption shall be as follows: 1. $~ 1.60 for each one hundred cubic feet consumed regardless of size of service on bills beginning July 1, I996.Januarv 1. 2002. 2. $+:-3-8- 1.66 for each one hundred cubic feet consumed regardless of size of service on bills beginning January I, 200eJ. 3. $+;49 1.73 for each one hundred cubic feet consumed regardless of size of service on bills beginning January 1,200+1. 4. $t:U6 1.78 for each one hundred cubic feet consumed regardless of size of service on bills beginning January I, 20OZ~. 13.44.050 Monthly Commercial Metered Rate - Outside the City. A. The following monthly customer charges are applicable to commercial water service outside the corporate limits of the City of Port Angeles. The charge is based upon the size of the service line and not the size of the meter, except as specified for three-fourths-inch service below. The customer charges are as follows: . 101_ 4 _ Service Size Customer Charge Per Month On Bills Beginning On The Following Dates: 7/1/981/1/02 tftfOO 1 11/03 1/11011/1/04 3/4-inch service (with 5/8-inch meter) $ZZ:ge28.60 $24:7529.75 $26:-9630.95 3/4-inch service (with 3/4-inch meter) Z4:4e30.45 %:3531.65 28:4532.95 I-inch service %:9533.65 Z97t635.00 3-t:4536.40 1 Y2-inch service 49-:5659.30 5+:3B61.65 55:4664.15 2-inch service 7Z:Z590 .15 78:B593.75 &4-:2597.50 3-inch service 129.70161.85 140.10168.30 151.JOI75.05 4-inch service 212.05264.65 229.00275.25 247.35286.25 6-inch service 417.70521.30 451.10542.15 487.20563.85 . tfl-IW 1/1/05 $~ 31.85 3-6:45 33.90 33. G 5 37.50 59::3B . 66.05 96:+5 100.45 161.85 180.30 264.65 . 294.85 521.30 580.75 B. Metered consumption shall be as follows: 1. $t:e5 1.31 for each one hundred cubic feet consumed on. bills beginning J nly 1, t9967January 1. 2002. 2. $+:+3- 1.36 for each one hundred cubic feet consumed on bills beginning January 1, 2006J.. 3. $t:ZZ1.42 for each one hundred cubic feet consumed on bills beginning January 1, 200t1. 4. $Ht 1.46 for each one hundred cubic feet consumed on bills beginning January 1, 2006~. 13.44.055 Resale Rate. In circumstances under which the Director determines pursuant to PAMC 13.32.020F that it is appropriate to allow a customer to furnish City water to a subsequent purchaser for the purpose of resale or transfer of the water outside of Port Angeles, the rates and conditions for such water shall be as follows: A. The regular monthly metered rate for the water service at which the water is obtained shall continue to apply. . B. A surcharge shall be paid for water consumption in excess of 100,000 gallons at the rate of $.00375 per gallon. This surcharge reflects the commodity value of water for resale or 1 02_ 5 _ . transfer as well as the fact that such irregular purchases of City water are not required to pay service connection or latecomer system development charges as do other new customers ofthe water utility and the fact that single, large purchases of-water can have a negative impact on the City's water utility and source of supply. C. Said surcharge tpay be used for special water utility purposes such as water system or water quality improvement projects. . D. Any fees charged by the customer to the subsequent purchaser shall be subject to the approval of the Director. . E. The purchaser shall be required to execute a hold harmless agreement, acknowledging that the City makes no representations as to the quality of the water and indemnifying the City and its officials and employees against any claims, lawsuits, or damages that may result directly or indirectly from the purchase of water from the City of Port ~ngeles. 13.44.060 Wholesale Contract Sales. The amount to be paid by wholesale customers shall be established by contract. . '13.44.070 - Rates - Temporary Water Use. A. For billing purposes where two or more premises are served on a temporary basis through a single meter, each shall be considered a separate premises. B. The use of water for construction purposes shall be allowed, where available, to construct or reconstruct any building or structure or settle trenches or fills. Before commencing such usage, application therefor shall be made to the Department and a fee shall be paid in the following amount: 1. $Z5:00 31.20 until December 31, t999 2002~ 2. $Z9:00 32.45 beginning January 1, ZOO&: 2003. 3. $Z9:-t5 33.75 beginning January 1,~. 2004. 4. $31.20 34.75 beginning January 1, Z66.Z. 2005. Water used shall be paid for at a rate described in Section 13.44.050. . 13.44.080 Rates - Fire Protection. A. Where City water is used for fire protection purposes, no monthly rate will be charged for such service. B. The customer and/or property owner shall be responsible for all repairs and maintenance associated with the fire protection service, beginning at the connection to the City water main and ending at and including the service within the building. The Department shall perform all repairs and maintenance activities on the fire protection service line within City rights-of-way. All costs associated with such repairs and maintenance by the Department shall be paid for by the customer and/or property owner. C. If such repairs and maintenance costs (for work performed by the Department) exceed one thousand dollars, the customer and/or property owner may arrange a payment schedule with the Director of Finance to pay for the costs over a period oftime not to exceed twelve months. Interest shall be charged at the rate of one percent per month on the unpaid balance. The minimum interest shall be fifty cents. D. Where such fire service is provided, no charge will be made for water used in extinguishing fires of incendiary or accidental origin, if the customer at the location where the fire occurs gives written notice to the Department within ten days from the time of such fire. Otherwise, all water used will be billed at the applicable rate, as established for the primary metered service 1 03_ 6 _ serving the premises, as provided for in this. chapter. . E. Where the size of a single-family residential service must be increase'd to provid capacity for a residential sprinkler system in a residence and the Fire Department certifies that the fire sprinkler system has been installed, the residential water rate for the residence may be that of a three-quarter-inch service with a five-eighths-inch met~r as established inSection 13.44.020. (Ord. 267391 (part), 2/l4/92; Ord. 2204 91, 4/l9/82;Ord. 2181 Ch. 6 98,12/3/81) 13.44.090 Service Charge. Whenever the Department responds to a request outside of regular working hours for assistance to investigate a deficiency in water service to any premises and it is determined that the deficiency is the result of improper operation or maintenance of the customer's plumbing, a charge will be made to defray a portion of the cost of responding' to the request in the following amount. 1. $100.00125.00 until December 31, +99972002. 2. $108.00 130.00 beginning January 1, ZOO&2003. 3. $IIG.OO 135.20 beginning January I, ZOOt:2004. 4. $125.00 139.2? beginning January I, 2002:2005. Section 2. If any provision of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder ofthe Ordinance, or application ofthe provisions ofthe Ordinance to other persons or circumstances, is not affected. Section 3 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days following the dateo. its publication by summary. PASSED by the City Council ofthe City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of , 2002. MAYOR ATTEST: Becky J. Upton, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney PUBLISHED: By Summary F:\ORDINANCES&RESOLl1110NS\2002.JO.ord, wpd . October 24, 2002 1 04 _ 7 _ . . . F.........:.... ,/0/ .!R.:Ti};.'............/....N.,. ...fG/,E,:Li E:'S'" . .....,... . _,...}' ,,:.. ., _._~'.. if __ _.. ' _ ..>.......; ..,:...} .~.:' - ~/ . ~ .. ,: " 'w', ' .'.. ., I WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO DATE: November 19, 2002 To: MA YOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL Brad Collins, Community Development Director 1c- MISCHKE STREET V ACA TION STY 02-03 FROM: SUBJECT: Summary: Mr. Neal Mischke petitioned the City for vacation of a portion ofW. 4th Street right-of-way that deadends on a marine bluff. The Real Estate Committee reconsidered the required compensation and recommended $4302 for the 2550.34 square feet of vacated right-of- way. The REC recommendation is based on 50% of the County Assessor's valuation of the entire Mischke property (Lots 7-9) per the staff analysis. The Planning Commission recommended vacation of the subject right-of-way. Recommendation: The Department of Community Development recommends that the City Council approve the Real Estate Committee's recommendation by adopting the attached ordinance and citing the Planninl! Commission's condition, findin~s, and conclusions. Background / Analysis: The topography of the area limits building and use of the subject vacation area. The Real Estate Committee was asked by staff to reconsider an initial compensation recommendation that was based on dissimilar comparable property values. State law requires that the City obtain a fair market value for public property that is sold to private parties. The Real Estate Committee has reviewed new information about the property valuation related to the subject vacation area and has r'evised its recommended price for sale ofthe right-of-way. Mr. Mischke previously expressed concerns about whether the recommended compensation represents fair market value, since the subject vacated area has constraints on its use for building purposes. Staff demonstrated that Lot 7 with the addition of the vacated right- of-way can provide the same rights and privileges of use as other standard City lots. Staff analysis of the use as well as the buildable area of a substandard 2625 square foot Lot 7 as currently configured shows substantially less use and buildable area than for a standard 7,000 square foot Lot 7 with the addition ofthe 2550.34 square feet of vacated right-of-way. Staff will be available at the meeting to answer questions. Attachments: Draft Ordinance Condition, Findings, and Conclusions Planning Commission October 9, 2002, Minutes Excerpt City Staff Reports Neal Mischke July 31,2002, Letter on Geotechnical Report and September 5, 2002, Petition 105 . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, vacating a portion of unopened City right of way between "K" and "I" Streets south of 4th Street. WHEREAS, a petition is on file with the City of Port Angeles to vacate a portion of unopened City right of way between "K" and "I" Streets ,so~th of 4th Street; and WHEREAS, the City Council initiated said vacation by Resolution No. 12.02; and WHEREAS, street vacations are categorically exempt from the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) rules as set forth in WAC 197 -11-800(2)(h); and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the City Council following public notice pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW; and . WHEREAS, said vacation appears to be of benefit to and in the interest of the public; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows: Section 1 - Vacation. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, the following described right-of-way as shown on the attached Exhibit A is hereby vacated: That portion of City-owned right of way in Lot 7, Block 129, Townsite of Port Angeles. Section 2 - Conditions. 1. A sensitive area tract, as prescribed in Ch. 15.20 P AMC, shall be established for any portion of the subject lot that is located within the ravine or a 25-foot ravine buffer. . - 1 - 107 L. Section 3 - Compensation. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.030, the compensatio~ required f. the vacation of this street is $ Section 4 - Ouit Claim Deed" The owner~,of abutting property entitled to the vacated street, pursuant to RCW 35.79.040, may present a quit claim deed to the City of Port Angeles for execution by the Mayor, who is hereby authorized and directed to execute such quit claim deed. Section 5 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective only upon the satisfaction of the terms and conditions of this Ordinance. Upon that satisfaction, the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish this Ordinance and to file a certified copy with the Clallam County Auditor and the Clallam County Assessor. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of ,2002. MAYOR .. ATTEST: Becky J. Upton, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney PUBLISHED: By Summary F:\ORDINANCES&RESOLlITIONS\2002-27 .ord. wpd - 2 - . 108 . CONDITIONS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF STY 02-03 MISCHKE . . Conditions: 1. A sensitive area tract, as prescribed in Chapter 1 :S.20 P AMC, shall be established for any portion of the subject lot that is located within the ravine or a 25-foot ravine buffer. Findings: 1. A valid petition requesting the vacation of that portion of the unused portion of City '. right-of-way that is located south of West 4th Street between "K" and "I" Streets was submitted to the City of Port Angeles on September 5, 2002, by Neal Mischke. The property is described as being contained entirely within Lot 7, Block 129, Townsite of Port Angeles. 2. The site is currently zOJ;1ed RS-7, Residential Single Family. 3. The City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map were reviewed forconsistency with the proposed vacation of right-of-way. The City of Port Angeles' Real Estate Committee met and established the value of the unopened right-of-way. The unopened right-of-way covers an area of 2550.35 square feet. The subject right-of-way has not' been used for through traffic and other sections of the right-of-way have reverted to property owners so that there is no potential for the right-of-way to become a through street. 6. A geotechnical review was conducted on the site in April of2002. A recommended building limit was shown for the site and adequate buildable area for a single family residence is available on the site. 4. 5. 7. The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from a State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) review per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the Washington Administrative Code. 8. The site was posted and required publication appeared in the Peninsula Dailv News on September 23, 2002. 9. The Port Angeles Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed street vacation on October 9,2002. 10. This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council that will act on the petition after a public hearing scheduled for October 15, 2002. Conclusions: A. As conditioned, traffic patterns on surrounding streets would not be negatively impacted by the vacation. Low density residential development patterns in the area will not be affected by the proposed vacation. B. 109 C. The residential development pattern in the vicinity will be extended to the east by one building lot by the vacation of right-of-way. D. The proposal is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan, specifically the following Comprehensive .Plan policy has been found to be most relevant to the proposal: Land Use Element Policy B.2. E. As conditioned, the str~et vacation is in the public interest. . Adopted by the Port Angeles City Council at its meeting of November 19,2002. Glenn Wiggins, Mayor Becky J. Upton, City Clerk . . 110 . . . Planning Commission Minutes October 9. 2002 Page I PUBLIC HEARING: STREET V ACA TION PETITJON - STV 02-03- MISCHKE. Portion of Highland Drive: A petition to vacate a portion of City right-'of-way located between 4th and 5th Streets east of"K" Street. Associate Planner Johns presented the staff report recommending that the Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council. Chair Schramm opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, Chair Schramm closed the public hearing. During a brier discussion, Chair Schramm. pointed out a minor error in syntax in the staff report. Staff indicated that the correction would be made. Commissioner Hewins moved to forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council with the following conditions, findings, and conclusions. Conditions: 1. A sensitive area tract, ,as prescribed in Chapter 15.20 P AMC, shall be established for any portionofthe subject lot that is located within the ravine or a 25-foot ravine buffer. Findings: 1. A valid petition requesting the vacation of that portion of the unused portion of City right-of-way that is located south of West 4th Street between "K" and "I" Streets was submitted to the City of Port Angeles on September 5,2002, by Neal Mischke. The property is described as being contained entirely within ~ot 7, Block 129, Townsite of Port Angeles. 2. The site is currently zoned RS-7, Residential Single Family. 3. The City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map were reviewed for consistency with the proposed vacation of right-of-way. 4. The City of Port Angeles' Real Estate Committee met on September 10,'2002, and established the value of the unopened right-of-way at $0.15 per square foot. The unopened right-of-way covers an area of2550.35 square feet for a total value of $382.55. 5. The subject right-of-way has not been used for through traffic and other sections of the right-of-way have reverted to property owners so that there is no potential for the right-of-way to become a through street. A geotechnical review was conducted on the site in April of 2002. A recommended building limit was shown for the site and adequate buildable area for a single family residence is available on the site. The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from a State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A)review per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the Washington Administrative Code. The site was posted and required publication appeared in the Peninsula Dailv 6. 7. 8. 111 Planning Commission Minutes October 9. 2002 Page 2 As conditioned, traffic patterns on surrounding streets would not be negatively impacted by the vacation. 0 Low density residential development patterns in the area will not be affected by the proposed vacation. The residential development pattern in the vicinity will be extended to the east hy one building lot by the vacation of right-of-way. The proposal is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan, specifically the following Comprehensive Plan policy has been found to be most relevant to the proposal: Land Use Element Policy B.2. E. As conditioned, the street vacation is in the public interest. 9. 10. Conclusions: A. B. C. D. News on September 23, 2002. The Port Angeles Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed street vacation on October 9, 2002. This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council that will act on the petition after a public hearing scheduled for October 15, 2002. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Craver and passed 5 - O. 112 . . . o f1, ~. ~ . . ~ORT ANGELES WAS H I N G TON,. U. S. A. DEP ARTMEN'( OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Date: October 29,2002 To: Real Estate Committee From: Brad Collins, Community Development Director ~. . Subject: Mischke Street Vacation Compensation Recommendation Attached is Trenia Funston's analysis of property valuation which revises her first recommendation of $ .15 per square foot. Trenia has revised her property valuation to a range from $ .15 to $ 1.50 per square foot. There may be a problem with the willingness of the property owner Mr. NealMischke to pay more than $ .15 per square foot. In a conversation with me, Mr. Mischke told me that he was not willing to pay more than the property valuation that he was told was originally being recommended by the Real Estate Committee. He also said that he would prefer to litigate the matter because City staff people told him that the property was not usable and not worth more than $ .15 per square foot. However, the property valuation based on the County Assessor's current assessed valuation or on the sales price that Mr. Mischke is asking for the subject property ranges from $ 2.74 to $ 21.46 per square foot. These alternate analyses of property valuation are attached too. The fair market value, which the City is obligated to charge for sale of public property, remains to be decided by the Real Estate Cominittee. The County Assessor's assessment valuation is $ 3.3 7 per square foot based on a $ 57,500 value for Mr. Mischke's 3 lots less the right-of-way (17,043 square feet). The City has the option of charging from 50% to 100% of the fair market value, which in this case could be 50% of the $ 3.37 per square foot due to the geological hazards described in the geo-technicaLrepQrt by Zenovic & Associates. Following this logic, the cost to Mr. Mischke to acquire the City's right.;.of-way would be $ 4,302 or half of $ 8,604 (2550.34 square feet x $ 3.3738 per square foot). This valuation compensation recommendation is slightly higher than Trenia's $3,825.51 at $ 1.50 per square foot. Finally, the buyer of Lot 7, Block 129 is likely to have the same buildable area as any RS-7 single family lot. Zoning lot coverage (30%) limits the buildable area to 2,100 square feet ofa 7,000 square foot lot. In the case of Lot 7, a 2,100 square foot buildable area exists on the south part of the lot entirely owned by Mr. Mischke per the Zenovic report. Without the purchase of the City right-of-way. The maximum buildable area of Lot 7 would be 787.5 square feet (30% of2,625 square feet again per the Zenovic report). It is my conclusion that the fair market value ofthe City's right-of-way should be between $ 4,302 and $ 8,604 for the 2550.34 square feet of property that Mr. Mischke wants to acquire and sell. 113 PropertY Valuation of Lot 7. Block 129. Public Right-Of-Way Based on Zenovic & Associates display sketch for geotechnical review of Lot 7, Block 129" Townsite . of Port Angeles, Sheet 1, dated April 2002, the buildable area is described as southwest of a line approximately 25 feet northeast of the southerly property line along the easterly property line and 80 feet northeast of the southerly property line along the westerly property line. This area is approximately 2,625 square feet in size. 25 ft x 50 ft = 55 ft x 50 ft x ~ = 1250sqft 1 375 sq ft 1250 sq ft + 1375 sq ft = 2,625 sq ft 7,000 sq ft - 2,625 sq ft = 4,375 sq ft 4,375 sq ft x $ .15/sq ft = $ 656.25 $ 57,000* - $ 656.25 = $ 56,343.75 * asking sales price of Lot 7 $ 56,343.75 /2,625 sq ft = $ 21.46/sq ft compared to $ 57,~0 / 7,000 sq ft = $ 8.24>/sq ft Alternately: ' , , ' . Based on County Assessor's current assessed valuation of Lots 7-9 excluding street, the propertY :valuation of the land is $ 57,500 for 17,043 square feet or $ 3.37/sq ft. If you used all of area of the 3 lots or 21 ,000 square feet than the property valuation would be $2.7 4/sq ft. The property value of the City's right- of-w<:iY on Lot 7 would be $ 8,604 for 2,550.34 square feet at $ 3.3738/sq ft and $ 4,302 at 50% of this property value. . 114 Scale: ," = 50' D ~ 1~ 1~ I I I I . .. . 'APP;O~~~G"II~~\ ~ L;;' . l , '..-"".(7..,.... , ~ .. ; . ... . .. /' /./1 : 'i"l7~ .. ....~.[$ll1jAl[D~: I : . .. .; ~OfRQ'05(Of ~ ...........'.~.U11IT . SLOPE (t:~~~ . . . . ./ p' ~ RECOIl..~..ENT ~ 1~ .......... 1. I : ~~. (':~:.':'l. . ...; ~ V. .. I) ~125 .........../.'. Ii D ./ : I~ .. . .. ; .. .. .._<.....~...... :'1~ : :: 200 : 1~ . 100 ~ HORIZONTAl. IIISTAHCt: SECTION A-A ;I ~ APPROlll..ATE PROfll . ~I ElIISll~i ~175 .~.~I,S~O'~~j"".~ .....,--1~~)-/.-:......., s : 'if /: v \ : ~ .~,..., . . ISO 'UNni,. U""'~"" . .r... ./. ~ ..I. . ~.. :~:;~~UIllT i ANCU or REP~9E ~ . . /._ : SEl1IACll (1.llHflV) II: "Of'[ (UH:I\': I I~: I.,,: : ~ :" : 1'.: -: 125 .............. ./.. '1' . . . ... . . . . . . . . . '1 ~ .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . ~ / : ;: . D . h . .... /.?, : .... ~'OO ......../~.......:. :i:.... .... ~ -~. . .. ~ 75 d 0 so 100 ISO 200 HORIZONTAl. IIISTAHCt: SECTION 8-8 w"" D/SPLA Y SKETCH FOR GEOTECHNICAL REVlE LOT 7, BLOOC 129, JOMHSrlr OF PORT ANGElES ......~ /JR. NCIL /JISCHKC 15J4 lIt:ST FOURTH STREeT -.... I ...'" . I PORT ANGELES. 11''' gBJ5J 0204J ..,. Z ENOVIC & ." .. ...-. IT~ t1L II APRIL 2002 . flail' MCI1II.. .. ... ASSOCIATES -= (JlGI.,,-_ IC.tLI . ~ftD ,,.., (JIG) 117-01'. ,. - :so' I fit DRAWlNC: ..;eT~""""-I.... 1 . ..'" fB) IE <<: IE ~ \Yl IE rR\ 1n1! SEP - 5 2002 IlW CllY OF PORT ANGELES COMMUNITY nFVI=J npUr:NT ~J~Cj . . y . ./ ~ 1; 7 1 ~? ///"\/1 \ D ~ ~ ~ :? \ ~~~~ ~ ~ " ... . 116 o ~ ~ F"O' R" T":')lN'-G"'E"L'- E....S.. ;~..1' ./ ," : " " ~: ,.'" !. ; . :".~ . :' ..... '.. .. ....... ...~.. ... WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE: October 28, 2002 TO: FROM: RE: . On August 15,2002 I sent a memo to Dennis Dickson, Sr. City Attorney regarding the County assessed values for Hill side properties on the west side oftown. As previously stated in the memo a good portion of the properties are owned by either Clallam County, City of Port Angeles or the Port of Port Angeles. Hillside properties under private ownership are listed below. Block 110 between "c" & "D" Streets Block 103, lots 19-20 west of "A" Street Block 125, lots 11-20 between "H"& "I" Streets. The assessed values for these lots averaged out at $0.15 per SF. This was the dollar amount that I presented to the City's property management committee on September 6. At the time of my listing the assessed values, I was unaware of the sale price offered to Mr. Mischke for his lot. Upon the DCD staff presentation of the assessed value information to the Planning Committee, and City Council it was determined that the assessed value presented wastoo low. It is my understanding that based upon the proposed sale price, the assessed value should be the same as other property owned by Mr. Mischke, which would be at $3.37 SF. I have revisited the site in question and have this opinion regarding this proposed value of the property: . Due to the geological limitations ofthis property, the area in which Mr. Michke has a build- able site is limited. He has submitted a copyof a geo-technical report preformed by Zenovic & Associates. The report states that the recommended area for conventional construction would be limited to 40% ofthe lot, of which would be adjacent to the alley. With the required building setbacks, and the required ravine setback this site will be further impacted. · There is an existing asphalt roadway in that portion of the proposed street vacation. It is possible one could use the area for parking a vehicle, but there is insufficient area to turn around and does require backing out onto "K" at 4th Street. . 117 I have also revisited the infonnation regarding the assessed values for adjacent properties. · In 1982 the City Quit Claimed a portion of lot 15 containing 2,796SF more or less to to Mr. & Mrs Pearce. The square foot fee was $0.80. · In 1993 the City Quit Claimed a portion of lot 16 and lot 17, containing 2,250SF more or less to Mr. & Mrs. Sexton. The square foot fee was $0.88. '\ · Lots 1-4, Block 129 at 4th & "I" Street are assessed at $1.50. A house sits on lot 1 and the remaining (3) lots are hill side property. Upon reviewing the adjacent assessed properties as well as the limitation of a proposed building site for the property in question, the range for this proposed vacation would be at the low end $0.15 SF mid range $0.88, with the high end being @ the $1.50. ' 118 . .. . X210.7 . . . 120 I . FORTANGE.LES e, FILE W A 5 H ) N G TON, U. 5'. A. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I, ' TO: Chair Schramm and Planning Commissioners FROM: Scott Johns, Associate Planner DA TE: October 9, 2002 RE: STV 02-03 APPLICANT: Neal Mischke OWNERS: Same . REQUEST: Vacation of right-of-way COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for street vacation request STV 02-03 based on 2 condition, 10 findings, and 5 conclusions f()undin Attachment A. BACKGROUND: " A petition requesting vacation of a portion of unopened CitY right-of-way was submitted by Neal Mischke on September 5, 2002. The petition requests vacation of that portion of the unused City right-of-way located south of West Fourth Street between "K" and "I" Streets. The area is part of a larger strip of property that was condemned in 1917 to be used as right-of-way but which has not been used as such in recent history. The property is described as being contained entirely within Lot 7, Block 129, Townsite of Port Angeles, and, as such is owned entirely by the Mischkes. The application materials are provided in Attachment B. PEP ARTMENT REVIEW AND PUBLIC COMMENT: . The Public Works and Utilities Department has made no comment on the proposed street vacation. . . The Fire Department has made no comment on the proposed street vacation. 121 ~ October 9, 2002 . Page 2 Community Development Depanment Staff Repon ';"; ..1f~'" M;~ :l. '.' - ...... ." . Police Department had no comment on the proposed street vacation. . Community Development Department: Currently the site contains a small garage. Due to the combination of required setbacks from the unopened portion of City right-of-way, lot area not covered by the unopened right-of-way, and topography, the lot currently does not contain adequate buildable area for a residential structure. Areas of potential impact of the proposal are summarized asfollows: Traffic Patterns: As conditioned, traffic patterns in the area should not be affected by the vacation, as the right-of-way has never functioned as a through street. The paved portion of the street terminates approximately midway through the site. A portion of the original right-of-way that was obtained in 1917 has reverted to the property owner to the south of this site. ' Development Patterns: The proposal will not affect development of other sites in the area . as the right-of-way that would be elimi,nated is not required for service to developable areas. The subject lot gains access from the 4/5 alley. Vacation of the ri ght-of-way would result in the subject lot becoming a buildable site. Currently, the required setbacks from the right-of-way and the limited allowable lot coverage out side of the right-of-way. prohibit the lot from containing a structure of usable size. The unopened right-of-way covers 2550.34 square feet of the lot. The remaining 4,450 square feet of the site is bisected diagonally from southwest to northeast by the unopened right-of-way, further limiting the ability to develop the site. \, Environmentally SensitiveAreas: The site is located on a portion of property that contains steep slopes and is near the top of a ravine. An environmentally sensitive area exists on the lot adjacent to the east of the subject lot A geotechnical review of the site was performed in April of2002 by Zenovic and Associates, Inc. of Port Angeles. The geotechnical review indicates that there is buildable area on the site, adequate for a single family residence. Public Health, Safety and Welfare: Vacation of the proposed right-of-way will not interfere with the public's health, safety or welfare. The right-of-way has no value to the City as public space and returns no revenue in the form oftaxes while in public ownership. There is no development proposed in association with this street vacation at this time. Vacation of the right-of-way would provide the site with adequate area to contain a residential structure. The Building Division had no comment of the proposed street vacation. . Per required publication and notification procedures, the site was posted, and notice of the petition filing was published in the Peninsula Dailv News on September 23,2002. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE: The subject property is designated as Low Density Residential, (LDR) on tbe Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Residential Single Family (RS-7) on tbe City's Zoning Map. 122 . . . r .---- . . . Community Development Department Staff Report STY 02-03 . Mischke . October 9, 2002 Page 3. ..,0 The Comprehensive Plan was reviewed in its entirety in consideration of the proposed street vacation, and the following policy was found to be most relevant to the proposal: Land Use Element: Goal B, Policy 2 - Single family lots should be of reasonable shape and should have access provided by an alley or by a local access street or a collector arterial. The proposed street vacation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals, policies, and maps. The residential development pattern in this zone arid vicinity will be enhanced. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) review per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the Washington Administrative Code. This action constitutes a recommendation to the City CounciL The City Council has scheduled a public hearingfor consideration of the petition at its October 15,2002, regular, meeting. 123 7 " Community Development Department Staff Report STV 02-03 - Mischke October 9, 2002 . .Page4. . ATTACHMENT A Proposed Conditions, Findings, and Conclusions in Support of Street Vacation Petition - STY 02-03 Conditions: 1. Development on the site must comply with the requirements ofthe City. of Port Angeles Critical Areas Ordinance. Any development on the site that is within 25 feet of the top of the ravine must submit a clearing 'and grading permit application that shall be accompanied by a geotechnical report. 2. An Environmentally Sensitive Tract must be established for any portion of the subject lot that is located within the ravine or the 25-foot ravine buffer. Findine:s: . . A valid petition requesting the vacation of that portion of the unused portion of City right-of-way that is located south of West 4th Street between"K" and "I" Streets was submitted to the City of Port Angeles on September 5,2002, by Neal Mischke. The property is described as being contained entirely within Lot 7, Block 129, Townsite of Port Angeles. The site is currently zoned RS-7, Residential Single Family. The City's Comprehensive Plan apd Land Use Map were reviewed for consistency with the proposed vacation of right~of-way. , The City of Port Angeles' Real Estate Committee met on September 10,2002, and established the value of the unopened right-of-way at $0.15 per square foot. The unopened right-of-way covers an area of2550.35 square feet for a total,value of $382.55. 5. The subject right-of-way has not been used for through traffic and other sections of the right-of-way have reverted to property owners so that there is no potential for the right-of-way to become a through street. '6. A geotechnical review was conducted on the site in April of 2002. A recommended building limit was shown for the site and adequate buildable area for a single family residence is available on the site. 7. The vacating of a street is categorically exempt from a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review per Section 197-11-800 (2) (h) of the Washington Administrative Code. 1. 2. 3. 4. 8. The site was posted and required publication 'appeared in the Peninsula Dailv News on September 23, 2002. The Port Angeles Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed street vacation on October 9, 2002. This action constitutes a recommendation to the City Council that will ~ct on the petition after a public hearing scheduled for October 15, 2002. 125 9. 10. Community Development Department Staff Report STV 02-03 . Mischke October 9, 2002 Page S Conclusions: A. As conditioned, traffic patterns on ~urrounding streets would not be negatively impacted by the vacation. B. Low density residential development patterns in the area will not be affected by the proposed vacation. C. The residential development pattern in the vicinity will be extended to the east by one building lot by the vacation of right-of-way. D. The proposal is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan, specifically the following Comprehensive Plan policy has been found to be most relevant to the proposal: I,-an~ Use Element Policy B.2. E. As conditioned, the street vacation is in the public interest. 126 I. . . . . 31 July 2002 To; Trenia Funston , Engineering Permit Specialist City of Port Angeles 321 East 5th Street Port Angeles, WA 98362-0217 ~i ~ 0: ~ 68 ~2 ~ ~ Re: Lot 7, Block 129, Townsite of Port Angeles Par. No 06-30-00-012935 QTY Of PORT ANGElES toMMUNITY DEVElOPMENT Dear Ms. Funston, Enclosed you will find. copies of a Geotechnical Review of the above noted property by Zenovic & Associates, commissioned by Neal Mischke to provide information regarding the soil and slope stability to determine the feasibility of a possible home site. Zenovic & Associates has determined that it will be feasible to build a home on the property. The attached sketch shows the recommended limits on which a structure can be built using conventional methods and does not include any of the abandoned roadway. . In order to comply with the square footage required for a residential lot in the City of Port Angeles I will need to purchase the City surplus property that has that has been left over when the road, which used to run diagonally thru the property to 5th Street was abandoned. The buildable area left is approximately 40 % of property. The rest of the property, including the old roadway, is for all practical purposes unusable for any purpose whatsoever, because of its nearness to the 85-foot ravine on the East Side. The abandoned roadway is approximately 40 feet below the "Dead End" alley east of K Street and the only usable building site level of Lot 7. This precludes using any of the abandoned roadway as a possible access to a garage area (see the enclosed sketch of the area in question). It would be a four-story climb up to the dwelling. The alley is now used by all people on the south side of the easterly extension of 4th Street for their garages, because of the 40 to 50 foot down-slope from the building sites. The "Dead End" easterly extension of 4th Street is not and never will be used by any of the 4 possible building sites on it. We do get 4 to 8 automobiles per day driving up this unused "Dead End" street. As it is very narrow and difficult to turn around most people have to back out to K Street, before they can continue on. In our opinion, the street should be abandoned by the city. Enclosed is a photo of the area in question taken on 1 August 2002. Lot #7 has sold and the escrow is due to close on 13 September 2002. If there were any way to expedite this matter, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your consideration. ~~ -1t1~1tJ.L Neal Mischke 1634 West 4th St. Port Angeles, WA 98363 . (360) 452-5135 127 . .. . 128 . jOIt-!f (pr. . TO: . STREET VACATION PETlTI WUI 8EP- , L em Of PO, COMMUNITY 0 Come now the undersigned petitioners and pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW resp~- :.~-:.-:tv' 0 '2'.- - D 3, The City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington- 1. The undersigned petitioners request that the following described portion of }/16/. Street/AIley in the City of Port Angeles be vacated pursuant to Chapter 35.79 RCW (legall property requestedfor vacation be/ow). VItW4Te"b Tof/,q.r -PO,eTIt>>+ OF t-o T 7, BL.OGft::. /2-q WI-lieu W,4-S 7:)e:r~,n/A/~ >4-8J4.NJ:>~~e-t:J 5Te.ecr 11../ 1'171 - ~F A-Ie~ IS '2-S50,3~ 2. Each of the undersigned petitioners is the owner of an interest in real estate abutting described area. 3. L persons own property abutting on said area. 4. The names and addresses of property owners abutting on said areas are as, follows: Name Address N.fA.LMI~~!V~ 1t..-3_1 ~'.~~., ( 'fJiit ~1~ t( .1'r/~ [ 6~.(. w 4- r/./ h f \ O-y-rh~ ~. ~;{#~A4<-= 1r.,,~L(- UJ. t-j.~ ~J- 'P.~ 5. The undersigned petitioners constitute more than two thirds of the owners of said a property. WHEREFORE, the petitioners ask that proceedings be commenced hereon fo of said area of said Street! Alley in the manner prescribed in Chapte. R.espectfully submitted, ", Name Address J' S /)/ud. a. 7)j~ DiN! / . . 0j'~A;,tm.llff/AJ~L 7 .ile No. I ta4 It), t TYf,?r 1~.1~ t/.J. <lU~-/ 451 J-.j 5.-:" ..~:':w,.:. ._':.:.';'.' .;"___".",. ..".._. . '._ .. - - .....w .. _. .... .__.. ...._ . .. .. ... --.. . - - ... -. . . .-. - ~. ... _. CITY OF PORT ANGELES, 321 East Fifth Street, P.O. Box 1150, Port Angeles, WA 98362 (360) 417-4750 129 BLOCK t z.. 5> TOWNSITE of PORT ANGELES A [0): ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lnl SEP - 5 2002 CITY Of PORT ANGELES COMMUNITY DEVElOPMENT /' )~ "~.?r r+'"'~ \,^'P~c-c" "&V.(' , <::J ~~ "" ~ I ~ - - ~ fa cv~ ~~ r ~" ). / Iv!-" ~ )/; "-J .' , . This sketch is provided. without charge. for your information. It is not intended to show .all matters relate~ to the property including. but not limited to. area. dimensions. easements. encroachments or location of boundaries. It is not part of. nor does it modify. the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes " "NO LlABlLIlYfor any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further infonnation. 130 --.-'" . "_M _.__U _ - ---- ...-.... ..-....--- --------- ----- ----- . .. .---. -. - -- .. ,., '. . , .---.-""'" --...---.- ..----- .-.-...-.--.----------...--- '~ .~ ".! '."~. '.... ~ ..:........ ~ ~ . : .... . ,;'. . ~, . . .' .. '. ". . . ~. " .-~. - . Scale: 1" = 50' o 50' 100' 150' L I~_ I . . . APPROXI"'AllTEN'GP~~Lf .\~ '1 / OF EXlS . . :. : : .:..A7..:... . ..... /' /1 . ........... :.. /. /.;' : . NE OF ESnNATED~ ~. .'.............; ~CLE OFRQ'OSE ~. .......... . SLOPE U"'T SlOPE <':JH.:!V) . . . . /~ . . :' RECOll..E~~OP...ENT .......... : I : ~r:~<'.!5H:1V) :/. . .1.......... ...../~.. ~ .? : ')I ...:. ./ : .,::.!.. ..~. ..... C Z ~ 200 ISO 100 50 HORIZONTAl DISTANCE SECTION A-A ." '" ~ 175AP~O~~~~~'JJI.... ..3~i ,/.'......., . <=,/,. ~ . : ili,: .-(: : ~ ISO 'UNe-or t~l1liA~"" . .r... .y. ~. .1.. ~.~~~~.~~TU..,T 15 ANCLE OF REPO~ OF~ : "/ : SETB Cl( (I.!5H: IV) .. SlOPl: <'.JH:l\', I .....-::... I ." . . ~ . / . ,"'. . 125 .............: '/"'Yf" , , ,:. . , , , " " , '/ III :., . , . , , ".. ., ' : ~ / : !:l: ' o /,~ ~: IS . k' 1\;: .. '00 ../,. ~ .. .. I' .. .., /Ii ~ . .. . - ~ -~ . ~ 75 a 0 ~ '00 HORIZONTAl, OISTANCE ,~ 200 SECTION 8-8 ."" DISPLA Y SKETCH FOR GEOTECHNICAL REY7EW LOT 7, BLOCK 129. TOVtNSlTE OF PORT ANGELES QJ[NT: DRAWING: _IDT,lttID4Jj'tW.JP-I.oc /JR. NEIL /JISCHKE 15J. ~ST FOURTH STREET PORT I.NGELES, WI. 9BJ5J .(II NO. I !HUT 020.J 1 ' .Alt Z ENOVIC & '" L ......, II. OlL n I IoPRIL 2002 ASSOCIATES =.,~)\~-=. ICAII ~AltD '~.CJlO) "'-OStt. ,. - 50' I 01 rD)lE~[E~W~fR) lI11! SEP - 5 2002 I !W CITY O~ PORT ANGElES COMMUNITY DEVElOPMENT . . . DATE: To: FROM: SUBJECT: nO'R"T'I~ A1N: rGE:LE'!S F- oI"M .";",, I',. WAS H I N G TON, U.S. A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO NOVEMBER 19,2002 Summary: The City of Port Angeles is required by RCW 35A.33.070to hold a hearing onthe Budget in order to receive citizen input. There will be a brief presentation by the City Manager and Finance Director and Budget copies are available for citizen review. Recommendation: Conduct the Public Hearing and consider public comment prior to the final adoption of the Budget currently scheduled for December 3,2002. Backeround / Analysis: The Preliminary Budget was fiied on November 1 2002, with the City Clerk in accordance with State Statute. In the interim time period, the Finance/Budget Committee of the City Council has met in four separate work sessions to review the revenue and expense impacts of the Budget. As' a final review of information, the public is invited to respond and comment on their concerns for consideration in the Budget as well as any specifics contained in the budget document. There will be a brief summary presentation by the City Manager and Finance Director on the Budget proposal and the highlights contained therein. 133 Budget 2003 Expenditures . 2002. 2003 Proposed 2003 Budget Amended Preliminary Changes Budget General Fund 12,881,953 13,048,788 13,101,066 30,227 13,131,293 Special Revenue Funds Lodging Tax 443,880 426,680 435,500 435,500 Street 1,417,648 1,413,714 1,296,466 1,012 1,297,478 Real Estate Excise Tax#1 221,466 221 ,466 218,662 218,662 Real Estate Excise T ax#2 108,904 108,904 107,989 107,989 Criminal Justice 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 PenCom 1,093,447 1,107,684 1,592,815 1,592,815 Drug Task Force 1,000 6,000 1,000 1,000 Recreation Activities 142,661 172,974 221,625 221,625 Port Angeles Works 70,000 65,000 20,000 20,000 Electric Utility Rural Econ. Dev. Fund 40,000 22,500 50,000 50,000 Economic Development 135,718 135,662 135,758 135,758 LID Guaranty 0 0 0 312,879 312,879 Contingency Fund 0 0 0 0 Total Special Revenue Funds 3,869,724 3,875,584 4,274,815 313,891 4,588,706 Debt Service Funds 1991 G. O. Bond - Senior Center 0 0 76,576 76,57. 2001 Refunding G.O. Bond 183,218 183,368 280,830 280,83 1992 Refunding and Conv. Ctr. Bond 75,405 75,405 72,660 72,660 ;1992 G.O. Bond - Fire Station 95,100 95,100 0 0 1995 G.O. Bond - Library 287,895 287,895 291,735 291,735 LID Cqntrol 0 0 0 95,319 95,319 Total Debt Service Funds 641,618 641,768 721,801 95,319 817,120 Permanent Funds Esther Webster Trust Fund 102,469 105,376 110,073 110,073 Total Permanent Funds 102,469 105,376 110,073 0 110,073 Enterprise 'Funds Electric Utility 26,151,020 21,263,550 26,080,420 350,057 26,430,477 Water/Wastewater 10,199,668 7,366,383 10,221,396 289,935 10,511,331 Solid Waste 5,175,135 5,521,083 6,743,573 (1,400,000) 5,343,573 Total Enterprise Funds 41,525,823 34,151,016 43,045,389 (760,008) 42,285,381 Internal Service Funds Equipment Services 1,301,000 1,296,224 1,340,232 17,400 1,357,632 Information Technology 527,103 540,925 532,045 532,045 Self-Insurance 2,466,376 2,652,957 2,763,215 2,763,215 Total Internal Service Funds 4,294,479 4,490,106 4,635,492 17 ,400 4,652,892 Trust & Agency Funds 39,3. Firemen's Pension 46,944 47,593 39,342 Total Trust & Agency Funds 46,944 47,593 39,342 0 39,342 Governmental Capital Projects 3,63~ 889,000 2,496,000 0 2,496,000 Total All Funds 66,994,010 57,249,231 68,423,978 (303,171 ) 68,120,807 r- . General Fund Expenditures by Department: 2002. 2003 Proposed 2003 Budget Amended Preliminary Changes Budget I 55.477 Mayor & Council 61,013 55,941 55,941 City Manager 538,289 514,287 516,211 516,211 Community Services 152,350 152,350 129,592 129,592 City Attorney 493,060 477,428 483,560 483,560 Finance 1,595,326 1,577,900 1,642,611 1,642,611 Community Development 348,239 345,605 356,375 356,375 Fire 2,215,001 2,217,099 2,315,219 19,972 2,335,191 Police 3,624,095 3,723,333 3,844,104 3,844,104 Parks & Recreation 2,151,574 2,195,316 2,051,150 10,255 2,061,405 Public Works 1,146,795 1,226,615 1,128,480 1,128,480 Facility Maintenance 305,351 293,378 377,823 377,823 Transfer for CIP Projects 250,860 270,000 200,000 200,000 Total General Fund 12,881,953 13,048;788 13,101,066 30,227 13,131,293 . . List of Proposed Changes: .. Add back 5 month leave of absence for Firefighter .. Add back seasonal worker for Parks Maintenance ," Delete replacement of vehicle #1542 for Street - Street Fund (unfunded cost) - Equipment Services (full replacement cost) .. Add Sidewinder Sander - Street Fund (unfunded cost - transfer to Equipment Services) - Equipment Services (full replacement cost) .. Debt Payment on LID 211 (Del Guzzi Project) $953,190 - LID ,(3uaranty - LID Control - Electric Utility portion - Water portion - Wastewater portion .. PCB Starage area (carry over from 2002) .. Rebuild three pump stations (carry over from 2002) .. Stormwater assistance .. Project DR-54 Crown Park overflow (carry over from 2002) .. Decrease in GWI Compliance project .. Postpone Bluff Stabilization construction until 2004 .. Add Water Reclaim System Total Changes for all Funds 135 19,972 General Fund 10,255 General Fund (8,988) Street (22,600) Equimpment Services 10,000 10,000 312,879 95,319 240,057 129,354 175,581 110,000 65,000 20,000 100,000 (200,000) (1,400,000) 30,000 (303,171 ) Street Equimpment Services LID Guaranty Fund LID Control Fund Electric Utility Fund Water Utility Wastewater Utility Electric Utility Wastewater Wastewater Wastewater Water Solid Waste Equipment Services . . . 136 Budget 2003 Expenditures 2002 2003 Proposed 2003 Budget Amended Preliminary Changes Budget General Fund 12,881,953 13,048,788 13,101,066 30,227 13,131,293 Special Revenue Funds Lodging Tax 443,880 426,680 435,500 435,500 Street 1,417,648 1,413,714 1,296,466 1,012 1,297,478 Real Estate Excise Tax#1 221 ,466 221,466 218,662 218,662 Real Estate Excise T ax#2 108,904 108,904 107,989 107,989 Criminal Justice 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 PenCom 1,093,447 1,107,684 1,592,815 166,216 1,759,031 Drug Task Force 1,000 6,000 1,000 1,000 Recreation Activities 142,661 172,974 221,625 221,625 Por! Angeles Works 70,000 65,000 20,000 20,000 Electric Utility Rural Econ. Dev. Fund 40,000 22,500 50,000 50,000 Economic Development 135,718 135,662 135,758 135,758 LID Guaranty 0 0 0 312,879 312,879 Contingency Fund 0 0 0 0 Total Special Revenue Funds 3,869,724 3,875,584 4,274,815 480,107 4,754,922 Debt Service Funds 1991 G.O. Bond - Senior Center 0 0 76,576 76,576 2001 Refunding G.O. Bond 183,218 183,368 280,830 280,830 1992 Refunding and Conv. Ctr. Bond 75,405 75,405 72,660 72,660 1992 G. O. Bond - Fire Station 95,100 95,100 0 0 1995 G. O. Bond - Library 287,895 287,895 291,735 291,735 LID Control 0 0 0 95,319 95,319 Total Debt Service Funds 641,618 641,768 721,801 95,319 817,120 Permanent Funds Esther Webster Trust Fund 102,469 105,376 110,073 110,073 Total Permanent Funds 102,469 105,376 110,073 0 110,073 Enterprise Funds Electric Utility 26,151,020 21,263,550 26,080,420 350,057 26,430,477 Water/Wastewater 10,199,668 7,366,383 10,221,396 289,935 10,511,331 Solid Waste 5,175,135 5,521,083 6,743,573 (1,400,000) 5,343,573 Total Enterprise Funds 41,525,823 34,151,016 43,045,389 (760,008) 42,285,381 Internal Service Funds Equipment Services 1,301,000 1,296,224 1,340,232 17,400 1,357,632 Information Technology 527,103 540,925 532,045 532,045 Self-I nsurance 2,466,376 2,652,957 2,763,215 2,763,215 Total Internal Service Funds 4,294,479 4,490,106 4,635,492 17,400 4,652,892 Trust & Agency Funds Firemen's Pension 46,944 47,593 39,342 39,342 Total Trust & Agency Funds 46,944 47,593 39,342 0 39,342 Governmental Capital Projects 3,631,000 889,000 2,496,000 0 2,496,000 Total All Funds 66,994,010 57,249,231 68,423,978 (136,955) 68,287,023 -- General Fund Expenditu'res by Department: 2002 2003 Proposed 2003 Budget Amended Preliminary Changes Budget Mayor & Council 61,013 55,477 55,941 55,941 City Manager 538,289 514,287 516,211 516,211 Community Services 152,350 152,350 129,592 129,592 City Attorney 493,060 477,428 483,560 483,560 Finance 1,595,326 1,577,900 1,642,611 1,642,611 Community Development 348,239 345,605 356,375 356,375 Fire 2,215,001 2,217,099 2,315,219 19,972 2,335,191 Police 3,624,095 3,723,333 3,844,104 3,844,104 Parks & Recreation 2,151,574 2,195,316 2,051,150 10,255 2,061,405 Public Works 1,146,795 1,226,615 1,128,480 1,128,480 Facility Maintenance 305,351 293,378 377,823 377,823 Transfer for CIP Projects 250,860 270,000 200,000 200,000 Total General Fund 12,881,953 13,048,788 13,101,066 30,227 13,131,293 List of Proposed Changes: * Add back 5 month leave of absence for Firefighter * Add back seasonal worker for Parks Maintenance * Delete replacement of vehicle #1542 for Street - Street Fund (unfunded cost) - Equipment Services (full replacement cost) * Add Sidewinder Sander - Street Fund (unfunded cost - transfer to Equipment Services) - Equipment Services (full replacement cost) * Add E-911 payments in Pencom (additional revenue $175,189) * Debt Payment on LID 211 (Del Guzzi Project) $953,190 - LID Guaranty - LID Control - Electric Utility portion - Water portion - Wastewater portion * PCB Starage area (carry over from 2002) * Rebuild three pump stations (carryover from 2002) * Stormwater assistance * Project DR-54 Crown Park overflow (carry over from 2002) * Decrease in GWI Compliance project * Postpone Bluff Stabilization construction until 2004 * Add Water Reclaim System Total Changes for all Funds 19,972 10,255 General Fund General Fund (8,988) Street (22,600) Equimpment Services 10,000 10,000 166,216 312,879 95,319 240,057 129,354 175,581 110,000 65,000 20,000 100,000 (200,000) (1,400,000) 30,000 (136,955) Street Equimpment Services PenCom LID Guaranty Fund LID Control Fund Electric Utility Fund Water Utility Wastewater Utility Electric Utility Wastewater Wastewater Wastewater Water Solid Waste Equipment Services .'1 ,"'-"; /' 4' ",..." -;. -'\; .,.1lI~..., . 1 ,~:;; 3 .i!1 " ''o{',~'~ _I. ;--:~ ,~~ '~ 2 p;;.."i: ":"!i'.: ;{'~>"''':'~ 4j<O: J ",:"}',,: ." I ' I' J ill . .... _ L _ _.... : ''-'.J: ~""'L... -I- :' r~~: ,I ~~L-~Ll~ " , i I'i '," 'f '.~ 1 ' , ',. d ~,,, , .," 1 ~, · 'l'I'JIII'1J'I'1 t ~ cltlpL 'a"J/',n ~ J ~ B ~ 11.1 .,J ," h "l' . ji~ 'f.t 'l', ~ ~~;i '1 H ~ l ~ ~ ~ .~'~ ~ ~ 5H'~ ~ i, ~ f \Lj ~j ~n ~ 3 L~J.i~ . , jLr~;n'ci~ f'!,~.jCJ~'f-;:; , _ _~ft,,,. I.=!):'....;'> lJ' L ..;lJU - . _ _~~ .. _. ~L___ ~ ____ ~. -:1 3 f "':'~~,"::;~~""'~";'~"~~'''iT~t~:t..I~ ,;~:,,'}ji;~'-iiJ~. if;"j<'f'~'~ .r ~: ; .;. r; 4 I ." :;;.~" ~.. .t.' ~ "I ~.~~ f ~*:;.. ;;)< ! '. ";r., ~, ~' ~~~~; )it: ',~ .' ~ l , 'I $68,287,023 ,I' 20,000 18,000 16,000 {l14,OOO c III . g: 12,000 o t= 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000. o GO~\ \C,e~ 'ifPe~ \C,r;9 ~((}.~ -^~0- 'be~ ~~C,~ '!. 'be~ -{,.~'3-(Ii> ,...._.....\ ~\J'. dS'e~ ~~ ff"'(l> ~o v..... ~0 '3-~o ~o~ 0~~~ \~\e~ '$.~~ ~e~Q,rsJ. 'b~~ \~ ri\c,0 ~~'3-~ ~~0 'be .~ 0 r;f>\C,'{)S G'lR\ 'b- ~ ,;}~0 G\Os o~ \.:$' Changes to -2.003 'Bud,get;~s" ~ompa~ed' to 2002 'BJ'd.g,~t" '. -'. .! : . . ""~~"'_"IlIl_":4m/l*llUlIlIlIIv~IO~~iil~mJCI'llIl""""IllIUi"""'~.IlMIIhIIII~~ . COLA .1.6 - 20/0 IIi,AWCMedical rates'increase of 15. SOJo .:Teamsters medicar250/o increase . Property insurance 100/0 increase . Elimination of vacation sell back . Elimination of 1.5 positions . Assuming management control of County Consolidated Dispatch Operation 6 ,H, I I , . , . ct}a ng,es.~...,' 11.. ;.p(),o) will ~Jay:, 'closed on , ~undays:' '" . ,:Reductiori in FiDe Arts Center, operations ',.: '. :}~~,; . ;"" ; . Reduction in , ' , . , , support ~9 Madne , " , , ,Life Center, ~ ;J.... l""^ ~g W :,J.lL. }Jt;Y' \,;-. . 1\ r~~~~}~f :0kIF'E "-4 _...G>J1i'F~ ." ',- J....J __ \ , , ' ~, . ~ ~ .~ '1,' ~ \. ~~~-...~ 'tr, I L @ ~') , . PrOp6S~o(Cha\nges 'to :',' , ,Pr~fi'~jna'ry" B~dg~t.' " ~"ll.~~""'~=-~_"""~'_'lIINlI:..~~' 0:; I . ... .~ .' Add back '5 month "Ieave of absence' fo'r ,Firefighter;$19,972 ' . . ., Add back seasonal, worker for Parks , Maintenance $10,255' , . Postpone vehicle replacement of #1542 for Street ($8,988" in Street an'd$22,'600 in Equipment Services) . Add $10;'000 fo'r SideY'-'inder'Sander (Street and Equipment Services) , ' , 7 ., . . Pro PQ~ed.:':C h~'n 9 esto. Ca pita t' Pr0Je~ts" . Water: .Gwi pomplia'nte project will co~t:'onIY"$2'5;000' not $225;000 . Wast.e\^{ater: , . Rebuild three pump stations (project ~lJ.prove~ in "2Q02) $65,000. '. . . ~d,p,~tprmw~~en ~.ssistance' $?P;.ooq .. ~tQvVDP~rk.o.Y~J1J9~ (project deferred: _0 ' . fro"rriz29.Q2) $lPQ~o.OO . ", . . ,0, . .. , . Propose~d. GJh:~nges.'t'b;~:.':' ':,. .Ca'pita I PrOjectS... . ~""-:"~~~__Ill=ullll~~.u.,~-..-.~ .c.~ . . Electric Utility:. :.'0 II Ii' PCB' storage area (deferredU from 2002) $110,000 . Solid Waste: . . Po~tpone construction for Bluff Stabilization $1~400iOOO . Equipment Services: . Add water reclaim system $30,000 8 r--, . . Oth~rChang"es... . ....-~II . qebt payment on LID 211, (Del. Guzzi. Project) . '. $95;3,190,: " :' . LIP Guaranty Fund $312,'879 .-LID ControlFund $95;319 . Electric Utility $240,057 ' . ..Water'Utility. $129;354 .. Wast~water, Utility, $175,581 . .. , A'no One ",Mbr~ Chan'gf~~".~ '.........1lGI1liIIIIlllI~~1 '''I'lli tT~"''''''''''-~--Il'<lW' '-~......~.~,.. all_ . . Pen Com: . Additional ,revenue from E-911 $'175,000 . . IncreC3~e in Expenses ($1.E?6,216): · $32~OOO for wireless infrastructure . · $115,416 "phone bills . .' · $8,000 softw"are maintenance . . - , .'. · $4,000 Office supplies · $4,800 six chairs . . . . 9 . . . . --~--_._----_.. ---- Petsonne.1 Summary 242.1'FTE's' --~..--.' n Personnel Summary for the Ten Year Period 2~. 245 240 ~235 t:230 "0 .. 225 :/U v'" 1'\ l , . / I \ l ~ 1 . . , ,. ! 220 215 210 ,o,o,',o,rf}- ~<f>.~rt ,0,0," ,0,<#P ~~ ,o,o,'b ,0,<f>~<5> ~<:,'~<9- ~&> . " . - - -,.....:s'.t-:)~..h- ~'. ITemporary....~art-~ime..J976 FTE " .' '~ .., : " {' 1-~ -"l" :':.-, -~. . Pers.onnel Po.Sition by Service ~~*- ~------------ Personnel Positions by Service EQu.,rmnt SelVi:es 2% 13.5 c o '" . 13 '3 Q. o Q. 12.5 ~ 12 8- i 11.5 0, "li e 11 w 10 , Gen,eral, ,'Furfd $'13,131,2.9'3 , 'q)'_..4l. v . TotaJbudg~t:,refletts a. $249,340 or l.8,o/0, increase "from ?OO~ budget, .' Major'decr~ases: il1"areaof tran$fers' to Capital Improvement Projects and Capital. Outlay",.", . Operating expenses are 20/0 over 2002 level . ., Personnel, costs represent over 720/0 of the budget;~nd a~~ 3.80/0 or $373,115 more than 2002 budget.' ! ,! GenetaIFu,nd" Exp'eo'ditlire' by :0' b'J"e' c't . '. \.,; ~, ,'i, '1_~',:,~ i '~:,f ) $13,131,293 ~ -...- Thousands 10,000 9,000 112002 Budget 8,000 ' ..2003 Budget 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 o r-~0\ ~~" ....0" 0~~ iI.~'\ ,,ol'l'~,, ~ <?0t<P s.;;~~ ~S0~ N0t~1'I' '!I.~OS '0<?0~ 0t<(~ 0,<?tdl ,,\0 tcf (j~Q ~O~ 0 OS' S~0 'i:''a-~0 \~,0 .' ~,~'O~ . ~0t"'~ ' (j\<?1 (j (j0 ~t'lt''' ~0t\ot 'a-,,~<:i, ~t'a-~S o~0t 11 , , , Gei1~ral' :Fund" Expe"ndj~~.lre:' by Function' .' .,'"d.' ", >"'.;0,, . $13,131,293 ~.. ;^~~;~ :' ,:, ~ :;... _~ t~~< General Government Security of Person & A'operty Capttal Outlay Operating Transfers to Other Funds, Operating Transfers to OP Economic Environment, Alysical Environment OJtture & Rec reation o 2 3 4 5' 6 7 Millions General ,Fund" Bud,get Overview ; ,"" . '. . ~JaltIlII~lWI~;llall!fll!B8lllMrw-t-. " ~atllllMl.i.-I_.A:- ~~""lIClI<~I"""'~~~__ . ExeclJtive support functions (City Council,' City Manager'Office), " have been reduced to levels below' 2002 and 2001' . . , . .' Community Services 'have been reduced QY 150/0 in support tp United ~(dY request' ' . City Attorney services have also been decreased below 2002 budget 12 . . . . GF "Bud.get: Ov~tview.~. 'iI Finan'ce services r'eflect about a 30/0 increas,e,"buttHis 'is': largely ,due to ' support 's'ervfce~, 'su.~h' asthefollowing': . Increase incontributi(:m to 'Information Technology for a new citY-wide computer system . Increase in credit card . . . . , discounts of '$23,000 , ' . Increase in coJ)tr~ct with " , Qiversified: S.~rvices :' GF';Bud:get,Ov'e:iVie:w... , ". . . ,. . . .. .. . . i"'.Jl;j~~:\.'II0l~r.tlCI~'"UllIllOlll~.pl""'~tlI)t~\,rT-'-~~~fi~~x.;.:1IV\I8N1W~:<<v:>allll!l"jj1Ii~~~t:lt.ill'"~ .. Community, J~~velppri1e,nt services, increased by. 20/0,' . Fire D.epartment servH:esate up by SOlo, r:nost1y in,p~rsonllel'and contributions toPenCom 13 GF Budget Overview... ~-- ~~ . Police Departnient services reflect a'60/o or $220,009 increa'se . Majority.($150,000) is attributed to Airport SeclJ"rity (reimbursable) . . Supplies, and charges for services increase'is attribu~ed to implementation of the Reserves program . Decreas~inPenCom ch,i3rges (~32,55q) .. Decrease;in projected jail cost.($50,O,00) . Elimination of Animal Control 'Officer . ReplacefTJent of three PCiltrol ve~icles ~:' GFBudget Overv.iew~~. ,,;;;. ( ~f1.iI' :~ ,t ~,...: c ~ ~ f:""'--'-' '~ j . /' 1! _r..;-;::t-. ;~ ='-cJ;.-~~.~f:j,' '_.:lIllIl>1ilJllmn.'IlIINIl;'IISIIl.t<./lIIr.lUll....~I>>l(l.~.iIt'lIlllUWL'*''tIaaYJtliilllll&llllllltlllt!lilllU1lllt.'lIIcmur.;fil,llIIr.l1IIl;'IIHI:lWll6lllI!lIH~_ . Parks and Recreation services have been trimmed below inflation levels . . . . $11,911 reduction in capital projects . Personnel reorganization (transfer'Recreational Coordinator to Recreational Activities Fund and Facil!ty Lead,worker to Facility Maintenance) . Decrease maintenance support to neighborhood parks . Decrease support to Marine Life Center by $5,000 . . Continue $15,000 support to Fine Art Center 14 GFBl}c:Ig~t q~~rvi~w... " III , ~ , ,~; . , , . ~a<:iliti~s' M~fnt~n~nce 2,4?/o or $72,4 72 in~re~se)s a'~,s9ciat,ed with per,~bnriel,"reclassifica.tion' (transfer of FaCility Leadworker ' from 'Parks) ;".! ..J" . .~"." .: -.. ", ,', GF :'Budget~,0velvie\N".' , , '~lIm;~llW-.~_Ulf;Itfl~'....,..iw.<N\.IiW1\~~~tUln~~~SK.~~~f':IIl~:iuua~~;~ . \;'1 . . . . . . Ii PUQli'c Wqrksa~,d Utilities:, . . 'Projected 50/0, red~ctjon is': a result of $2'8,300 'reduction in capital' . purch~ses an.d:a $5,0,000 , 'reductlon in support of street improvement projects .' ~:~l,1 fi ., ,------=--:.;;"<!:'. . .rP ,j, '-~ ,J'.. . l;~ ./l'~.J/\~, ;':,i "'", I~ '~' - V III a " .t" ':, ,\" " , L' :.' ..,~ __"'" I." - -- . I I I ,:I 15 J Capital Outlay . . $37,355 ..~---- . Fire:. . SCBA overhaul $6,560 . . Ii SCBA "Integra'ted"'PASS $4,795 . Portable fire 'pump $5,000 . Engineering cqmputer and software updates $3,500 . Parks projects $17,500: . Inflatable play structure (Pool) $6,000 . Handicap pool lift $6,500 . Waterfront ActionTeam $5,000 Capital. Outlay... lllllI'lJnli~~~\jn"oiIIl'..,WtilllllWiMi..mlljRli:-.nBlll""~~!~':_'1lllIfI~~.lIIn<lClI.Jll:lJmrfIlit;________ . Vehicle replacement $ 30,370 (unfunded replacement cost only) includes three Police patrol vehicles .16 I .: . , Transfers to 'CIP' $20'0,0,00" ,,' . Pavement 'restoration . (reduc:tion as .' compareq to: 2.0Q2: Cap~ital' Impro'vement . . . . Prp'gr9,rn ,~ :.$~,':()P1,Q,'OO ;,.,... Note: some projecJs:have A9~e:sj,gnated funding. The following list includes projects.with designaled resources. . Carnegi~ Library $840:0,00 . . Olympic Discovery T~ail ,$1 ~4,000 . Fare Station roof repairs $418,000 '.Eastern corridor Enti-yway $225,000 . 8th Street Bridge replacement i , design ,$280,000 .' " ,f!,.ti~~' ~t. . . Sidewalk program $175,000 . Street paving programs,$200,OQO 17 ',;' ~~<~~t!, '~ ~~ ~ .,+, ~: ",f.:;.i,,,,~ '4; :'ttii-~ . ~~ ",,~,,~,~ ~l~~; ~~'1i!p'7'H"~~"?~'~ ~;ti' ~~'~461l !~J ~f>~-' I __ .~~ Ot,h~r.Pr;ojf?~ts ....!. '"f - . . ;.;..~ ^r r .'", { 1,<1 '~ L! 1 1.) rj. r . I , -;;.. -=- f l . J . ; I j: L....J I I t ~ ~~'''~: ~ "1 ',~; 18 ",i: ',,", ~r __lrtul. Recreational Activities 5% . . . , EconOlTic DevelOpmeni Funds 5% Crlrrinal " Re8J EState Justice E><clse Tax .' 5% 9% .,Lodglng,Tax, Fund~ '$435,300 , . . . '" il_/lIfM\MIWtlOW'..~,~.jfIll.;!1iII!>>"ff~~~~~I!tWifMIID1llW'lDIn~Ili~.Il/Im",~MlIl!_lII!INllI .' $162,345 or 390/0' Contribution SUppOrts marketing to ,Agencies . . progra'm .. .' 14%,' Marketing Chamber of Program .. $47,155 or 11,0/0 commerc. .39%, SUPPO,rts Vern' Burton' 15% ,debt payment . ,~x . $100,000 or 230/0 designated .for .. Convention' Vem Burton . Center Convention Center 23% . Debt .' ..' ..' ,Payment . $64,800 or 150/0 to 11% . Chamber of Commerce . $40,000 or 140/0 . contribution to' agencies 19 _Iold , .. . REET Funds $330,370. DIIlIl~JClIlI~""~_" ~""""""~IIllUIIISJ"'L.tb.__r.lI~ ..Transfer to:Street Fund $100,000 . Debt paymeflt:(REET #1): . Marine Drive (19-g3 project) $44,337 . 8th Stre~t Culvert (1993 project) , $5,002. . 8thStre~t design (2000 project) $69,323 . Debt payment (REET #2): . 8th Street reconstruction (2000/2001 project) $107,989 20 I .- ~~~.". l ." --~~~...-..:._ 'f ., .;' .,'"r.'"':+ PenConi . . . . . $1,759',:031 . As of 20Q. 3,rthe City a~~\,uni .. , '" A' ,u '.t:' - ." responsibiHty for op~ratlon aQ",'... . manqgerT)e.nt 'of County,:' , ~ _~ >~:~ . 'Consolidated Dispatch<C~I')'~~ri.. .. AlmQst '$500,000 ;or 4.60/0 increase. . Additional $406,992 support from 911 re"enue ahd '$131,00p.'frorh' grants' . 9?/o or $,86,51Q incre~se. in personnel costs .. . ., " . .. Increase in'maintenanCe support,'for specialized' computer syst~m:, . Improvements to telepHone and . compu.ter system $~.86,95,3' . Econ:omi.~ De'leloprllent Funds .$29:1,625 . . '" ~:ltItI;ar.aMP.lI.lI~"".-m~~~~~ .- ., Contribution to, ~D~ $35,000 . Main Street pro'gram' $15,000 . PA Business and Expaf)sion program $15,()00 . Incubator/Skill Center start-up $20,000' . Marketing program $15,000 . Harbor and .Waterfront . development plan - $20,000 21 Debt 'Service Fund $817/120 - . Includes $95,319 from LID control for LID 211 debt payment . $76,576,transfer to close 1991 G.O.Bond 1992 Refunding and 1995 G.O. Bond 2001 Refunding G.O. G.O. Bond Ubrar Construction . Bond Utilities (Enterprise Funds) $42/285/381 ~~~~I~~_~.~~~,~'eoItIIIII~..'llIlo~~ltW......~.o;~ . Accounts for 620/0 of total City budget, . Rates are set to recover operating costs, fund capital,' and debt payment . Capital. projects budget is $4/820,000, or 11 % of total, budget . Power purchase is $18,307,300 or 430/0 of utilities budget 22 Electric Uti lity': $26 430477 . " .., .... -- . . ~- , . . . ...... . $279,457 or 10/o.total.increase: . . "Increase ill pe~sonnelcosts of .! $37,030 or 2~30/o . $105,00 increas~ fn capita', proj~c:ts (includes one deferred from 2002). ~ Power pu rchases r:epr~s~nt 71 % of the Ele~tric Utility bl;)dget . Decrease in transfers to . - . . other funds (Computer system) Electric: UtiUty Major Expense . . -::l'ft~~;~~~,;~_~.llnIItl:Hll~~;1"I<:Rl~~(J1\)',~UI!Jli. Capital Outlay & Construction 4% .' $26,080,419 23 Wat~r/W~st~wat~r Utillty $10,511,331 -A-- ~ . PrQpO'sed, utility rate , ~I , . ,~~c~~~:~~I~oti~:~~\;~~~he :: a same level as 2002 . . Debt service of $1.4 M represents 240/0 of operating budget or $72.50 per re~~dent . Capital projects represent 370/0 of total budget' " . High: level of capital. spending in the past six years, totaling almost $16 M Wat~r/W~stewater' M.ajor Expenses ~__...~ ...........,_--~\AW-. ".WIUIl Till..... _p $10,221,396, Capital & Construction 35% Transfers 2% Personnel 14% Debt Service . 14% Taxes 5% Supplies & Charges for Services 30% 24 . . . Solid,'Waste' lJtility' $5,'343,573' ..' Rates.have been s~a~le for . eig,ht years: . . ..' . Rates a~e funding landfill closure ariqposf clOsure costs (420/0 of budget) . Debt free! . Major challenges: .. . LandfillClosureandreplacemerit of landfilf services' . . . . . Composting operation program Solid Waste ~Maj6r Expen'ses. ~lI'Illt""~:~~~"~~~_::-'~j~~""~ Transfer to Landfill Oosure and Post Qosure 20% $6,743,573 Transfers to Other Funds 2% Personnel 13% Supplies & Olarges for SerVices 36% 25 .'1 Utility CIP P,rOjects $4,820,000 Waste- water Utility 39% Electric Utility ,20%" . Ele,ttric' Utility $~,085,OOO . PCB 'Storage '$250,000 , , . Fiber' optics backbone $60,000 . Acquis'ifion,of Airport PUD electric services $100,,000 . Improyements in inJrastructure $675,000 ' . "Water Utility 41% " Utility CIP Projects.. . ~~',f"ry:;.",. 9~~ 1\.r:~," , ," ,"','yy;'!' ,z, ';' :.; ~'" l- ' f~I./\t.." -"'...I"",,,.f" ~\ '1-"'~ :~ ~;t~\ ~-:..~-;_ I I . ~~_ t <_~-.,;;~~'-~'- _.:--.~ ~.~ '.~~::~~o;;' r . Water $1,930,000 . Peabody, Heigh~ reservpir cover $400,000 . Concrete ~ipe replC3cement $950,0'00 . Elwha Dam mitigation $110,000 , . Other infrastructure, proj,ec~,s total $470,000 . Wastewater $1,620,000 . Pump statiofls #1 and 3 $500,000 , , . Septic receiving station $240,000 . Other infrastructure projects $880~OOO ...,.,..' ......... "..;.~- ....... 26 . . Intern'alServitesFLi nds' $4,652,.'892': .. . . "W'I1nlIl. ----.,.;.,___1lIIIll . Equipment Services $1,357,632' . . . Almost $400,000. designated to 'equipment : , replacemen~ (90/0 less than. hl 200~f .. '. Information Technology $532,045; this includes $100,000 for the support of city- wide new cOrl1putersystem. . . Self Insurance $2,763,215. Major challenge is to cover the consistently increasing medical insurarice rates (15:.5~/0. in 2003 and 210/0 in 2002)., .. Esther Webster'Trust (Fine:" . :Arts> Center)' Fund . . .. ~'SlU~~~~M~- it -lMlI.lI...lInncwu "1l.,..-w..'.l::..-b....4]~lll.-l.lI:Ial!l~ .'11T . . Decrease in revenue stream due to stock market decline . Preliminary budget of $110,073 continues reduced level of operation . . . Supported by General Fund $15,000.: '27 Firemens Pension '. Tptal .bu.dg~}, $.39,.~42; 'a d,ec:rease:of 160/o,as a ....esult of reduction'in . rlumherof'tieneficiaF-ies . . . Covers firemen hired. befo~e. March. 1, 1<)70 . Currently eight individu~ls' c~vered' by this system . I;\q.mirlistered by the Firetnen's" P~rision..Bdard . . Fina":lciallysound '~Q~.~; u ~ .{_.ii 1~,~(---...;.~(r!':~'.J k gr=;'~ ;;-h;r. ~J ..r~.--~:8."., ..".-'> <.... -p/1 .~~._____~1,ij , .-e;.~f["~LJlrk~ ; . Lookin:9 Ahead: lIUlIJlJ<lI":llkn..t'lllt:i.......~- - - .. .I/IIJa.... ~---:.-... -. .. . 2004 Bu~ge~ isproj~cted to. be difficult . Restricted Revenue Growth in Taxes . Lean Operational Budget.. . Stronger Fiscal Planning and Year-Round Budgeting . Leverage Financial Partnerships with Outside Resources . Construction Activity will test Community Cooperation . Increased Reliance on User Fees for Support . Voter Approved Resource Under Consideration . Need to Increase Assessed Value, Wealth, Investment'in Community . . 28 1- . ~ORT.ANGELES WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO CITY MANAGER'S CALENDAR / REPORT Novennber 19, 2002 City Council Meeting Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission Meeting Downtown Forward Executive Committee Meeting Special Utility Advisory Committee Meeting Law Enforcement Advisory Committee Meeting. Tuesday, November 19 6:00 p.m. Thursday, November 21 7:00 p.m. Monday, November 25 7:30 a.m. Tuesday, November 26 4:00 p.m. Wednesday, November 26 6:30 p.m. Tbanksgiving Holiday Thursday, November 28 & 29 Closed Gateway Review Team Meeting - canceled City Council Meeting Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission Meeting Downtown Forward Executive Committee Meeting Tuesday, December 3 6:00 p.m. Thursday, December 5 8:15 a.m. Tuesday, DecemberlO 3 :00 p.m. Wednesday, December 11 7:00 a.m. Wednesday, December 11 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, December 17 4:00 p.m. Tuesday, December 17 6:00 p.m. Thursday, December 19 7:00 p.m. Monday, December 23 7:30 a.m. City Council Meeting Gateway Review Team Meeting - tentative Utility Advisory Committee Meeting Outstanding Public Service A ward Breakfast - Sr. Center Planning Commission Meeting Real Estate Committee Meeting - tentative Cbristmas Holiday Wednesday, December 25 Closed entative": to be verified before next meeting. Reminder: tbis calendar is projected witb regularly scbeduled meetings as well as impromptu. As eacb day goes by, many items will be added or deleted. G:\CN CLPKT\CTYMGR\CMREPT\2002\02-11-19. wpd 137 . . ", . 138 t' c<' The Development of PORT ANGELES LITTLE LEAGUE/NORTH OLYMPIC BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL YEAR MAJOR BASEBALL MINOR BASEBALL PREP BASEBALL SENIOR SOFTBALL MAJOR SOFTBALL MINOR SOFTBALL TEE BALL TEAMS TEAMS TEAMS TEAMS TEAMS TEAMS TEAMS TOTAL. INVOLVED ;; 1981 10 6 286 1982 10 6 (Fencing installed on Minor basebaU field by Denver Gouge and friends) -$1,200 material cost 10 NIA 1983 10 9 10 411 (Concrete dugouts in.."ltalled. Warning tracks built by Steve Seed Eagle Scout project) -Concrete blocks donated by Shotwell; Gerry Mangano paid $1,000 to supeNise dugout construction; Approximately 100 man hours donated for construction and 100 for wamlng track construction. 1984 10 8 (Concession stand expanded) - Done with remaining concrete blocks. Approximately $500 cost and 50 man hours volunteer labor. 10 420 1985 10 6 4 14 531 (Major field fe11Cing complete. Foul poles installed. Buildings painted thn<lUgh Jeff Lunt Eagle Scout project. Fairgrounds leveled for softball play by Len BeiL) $1,000 to fair board for levering cost, seed and fertiliZer. Approximately 100 man hours in sealing and painting buildings. 10 6 6 14 550 (New irrigatio!:l system installed. First Community Day wi1h the Mariners.) - cost of irrigation system shared wittl city - approximately $3,000. 1986 1987 10 7 8 18 625 (Beginning of mail-in registration. New Volunteer field leveled by Howard Priest, Denver Gouge, et a!.) - Most of in;tialleveling work done by Uttle League volunteers as part of an agreement with Junior Babe Ruth that they would leave field 5 (near the ponds) fr.)r Uttle League expansion if We providad them a better place to play. 1988 10 8 6 4 (Eledric cable$ and gmy water to concessions instaled. Con<:ession stand area paved.) - Material cost for improvements about $1,000. electric.al, while l.akeside provided asphalt and Angeles Electric cmd Martin Electric provided electrical installation at cost. 22 754 Volunteer laborers dug channel for water and 1989 10 10 IS 6 4 22 851 (Completion of scorekeeper's stand. Installation of scoreboard. Completion of bullpens, with John Logelin responsible for sighllines; Hosting of first ever district baseball tourney.) - Scorekeeper's stand work approximately $2,000 + supports donated by Uncoln Welding; IT-Rayonier Inc. donated paid laborers $3,000 to build strudure. Longshoremen did sheet rock; Angeles Furniture donated carpet. Bullpen fencing approximately $500 and volunteer ~vork by Port Angeles Uons. Scoreboard with value of $1,500 provided by Coca Cola Bottling. 1990 10 14 6 6 (Second, manllal scoreboard instaMed. New dugouts and storuge area completed' - courtesy of Tony steinman. Material cost of 4 dugouts and storage area appro~imately $.'3,500. ApProximately 10 man hours pclinting. 5 22 958 All buildings painted. Hosted first ever district softball tourney.) . MAJOR BASEBALL MINOR BASEBALL PREP BASEBALL SENIOR SOFTBALL MAJOR SOFTBALL MINOR SOFTBALL TEE BALL TOTAL INVOLVED 1991 10 14 8 7 6 6 22 1,104 (Voluoteer Field completl~d, so Little League can expand eastwClfd; first "Let 1he Kids Play" Ball and Auc:tion.) - approximately 100 man hours in completion of Volunteer Field. 1992 10 14 8 8 (Played first fuR Season using field 5; hosted second boys' district tourney) 6 7 22 1,142 1993 10 14 8 8 6 (Beglln construction of backstops for softbaU complex at east end of park, as well as restroom for park; -Costs of backstops shared with city. Program cost about $4,500. 7 20 1,057 Hosted district, Division I, and Westem Region Softball tourneys.) 1994 10 10-AAA 6AA 6A 8 6 7 20 1,062 (Began BIG LEAGUE soflbaU - 1 team; completed backstops on ~ftball complex; completed rest room for park and dedicated it to Andy "schimperle; added scoreboard to southwest field, oolJrtesy o~ PA Police Association; hosted dislrict basebaU toumey. - Restroom cost about $3,000, built with volunteer labor. Materials cost of seWer Installation bome primarily by city, using expertise of program volunteers (primarily Joe Tschim~,rfe.) 1995 10 10-AAA 5AA 5A 7 6 8 18 996 (Received $4,000 from Walkllng Foundation; poured pads and built dugoUb; on fields 6 & 7; purchased portable backstop fOf field 5; extended backstops on fields 1 & 2; won a boys' district tourney for Int time; hosted majorlsenior softball toumeys.) -Portable backstop cost about $1,300. Dugouts, built by volunteers over about120 volunteer hours, cost approximately $3,000 for concrete and materials. 1996 10 10-AAA 5-AA 5A 6 6 818 (Purchased all new tourney uniforms; extended backstops on fields 3 & 4; completed bullpens for fields 6 & 7; attempted to begin hosted senior cflStJ;ict tourney; hosted the state Big League softball toumey and won it.) - About $2,000 in fencing. 924 a Challenger program; suffered a 100-year flood; 1997 10 1o-AAA 5-AA 4A 6 6 7 18 964 (Trenched and Wired roll!111y 800 feet for underground wiring; admitted 5-year-olds to prol1&m; suffered 2nd and 3rd "hundred year floods"; skinned softbaU lields; added netting over spectator areas of pinwheelt hosted district basebaU toumey; won major and senior softball distritts-national; won state Big League title for second time.)- investec1 at least 100 hours in flood control work. Incurred approximately $1, 200 cost for wiring, installed by league volunteers (primarily from P.U.D.); Paid $4,000 for safety netting." Prollided roughly 50 hours/abor to make fields 6 and 7 playable after they were skinned. 1998 10 10-AAA 5-AA 4A 6 6 7 18 (Installed a curtain drain im center fiek! of field 6 to allow absorption of ground water; installed gate valves on ponds to allow overflow escapement; area to square on east side. won major softbaft district (national), senior softball district (national), and won Big League state for thirrd year in a row.) materials plus labor, and assistance from Rayonier Ibr some materials. c950 expanded concession stand --Invested approximately $1,000 in . 1999 "' 10 10-AAA 5-AA 4-A 6 6 6 16 887 (Experienced flooding of all fields for 4th year in a row, with skill testing at Dry Creek School. Most man hours were spent were on flood repairs to concession stand. On Match 26 an airplane crashed on field 4,taking out a storage building and dugouts for fields 3 & 4, and only part of reconstruction could be done before season began. It was a season of accusations, but one wherre the Major National Softball team was district champion, and bo1h tne Junior and Semor SoftbaU teams were district <Ind state champions, and fini5hed 2nd ill division tourney at Keizar, Oregon and Anchorage, Alaska. MAJOR BASEI3ALL MINOR BASEBALL 16 U SOFTBAL.L 14 U SOFTBALL 12 U MAJOR SOFTBALL. 12U MINOR SOFfBALL TEE BALL TOTAL INVOLVED 2000 10 8-AAA 5-AA 4-A 6 6 4 16 798 (Provided $5,000 toward work at Stevens School to end flooding. Completed work mplacing minor baseball dugouts. Debated affiliation with Little League, and, ultimately voted unanimously to change the organization's name to North Olympic Baseball and Softball and affiliate with Babe Ruth Baseball. New tile was installed in the c.oncession stand and rebound boards were placed on major baseball backsto~lS. With donations Irom Port Angeles Youth Baseball and the Port Angeles Rotary Club, and labor by city staff and league volunteers, new scoreboards WE!re installed on fields 6 and 7 . Teams did not win tijtfes in the new Babe Ruth format, but a 16U team qualified for regional play. - In addition to donation for Stevens, approximately $1,000 and 150 man hours invested in rebuilding dugouts and doing maintenance work at fil~ld 2001 10 6-AAA 4-AA 4-A 2 4 6 4 13 700 {Built a permanent backstop for minor softball. Wrth P. A. Youth Baseball rebuilt major basebaU dugouts and replaced fencing, Completed outfield fence on fields 3 and 4. .. Purchased a new portabie backstop for Tee Ball. Hosted a 9 team 16U softball weekend in June and the 19 team North Washington eal Ripken Toumey in July. The Amerir,an major Softball tmlm quaHfied for regional play, The 16U team WOn North Washington and Region, and finished 4th' in the 16U World Series at Abbeville, Louisiana, with a 5 - 2 world series game record, - Cost of building dugouts (about $6,000?) WCIS borne by P.A. Youth Baseball. Minor backstop cost about $2,500, and fencing repair for fields 1 through 4 about $4,000. P. A. Youth baseball provided about tOO hours labor and NOBAS i,bout 50 on new projects. Cost of Tee Ball backstop about $1,400. 2002 10 6-MA 4-AA 4A 6 IS 4 12 678 {Softball program retumed to consofidated 16U for girls 13-16. Dugouts built for minor softball on field 5. Worked With city to, improve pond flooding, which occurred again after an absence of several years. A new drain field was laid aCITQSS the minor softball outfield, and field 7 curtain drain was unplugged (Jayson Grice]. Work continued on batting cages, utilizing funds pflwided by P. A. Youth Baseball. Decision was made to enter one Port Angeles team in Cal Ripken and 12 Softball tourneys. Work was. completed on 16' >: 16' buildings behind home p'late on fields 6 and 7. Hosted state 1GU and 12U Softball tourneys July 19 - 21, and Pacific Norlt1\vest Regional16U and 12U Softball tourneys ,JUly 24- i!B.) - Cost of Curtain drain materials for field 5 approxima,4ely $300, with about 20 hours volunteer labor for installation. $10,000 set aside to build minor dugouts and 2 16' x 16' /Juildinq5 on fields 6 and 7, With all labor volunteered, costs were :slightly in eXcess of 11 0, 000. 2003 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (Hydro seeding done at ea:st end of complex to allow two tee ball fields. -RI Serviceoi provided equipment and manpower to take of tllff and rough level; Lakeside provided a gradel and volunteer to 0'0 finish level; United Rentals loaned a rock picMr, leagu,!; volunte€lrs raked rocks, Rainbow SWIgeper provided hysdroseeding at cost -- $1, 199.94 for a job Walth in excess of $10.000,) CITY OF PORT ANGELES PARKS AND RECREATION Special Event ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT 2002 Making Port Angeles A Beautiful Place To Live, Work and Play! Special Event. Objectives ~ Maintain & Enhance ~ Plan, Promote, & Host ~ Support Other Events 2002 Special Events Parks & Recreation Sponsored Basketball - 11 Softball - 2 Forest Frenzy Rain-Deer Run Co-Sponsored Youth Swim Meet Baseball - 4 Softball - 3 Basketball - 1 Soccer - 1 Big Hurt Economic Impact The impact that a visitor has in relation to the production, distribution and consumption of goods and services while travel i ng. Methodologies Used D National, State, and Local Statistics D Sales Tax Reports D Lodging Tax Reports D Surveys (Written, Telephone, and In Person) +-' U co c.. E Ul 1--1 ..., U C OJ .- E -0 .- ~ Ul 0 OJ Ul C - ~ CO 0 - :J U CO Ul W u CO OJ 0 U -.J ::: ..c \.I- ~ +-' 0 0 C) C C C 0 0 .- .- .- 1- Ul Ul ::J ::J :J - - Ul U U CO >< >< OJ W W ~ . . Multiplier Concept . Spending Money Directly Stimulates Economic Activity · Product Replacement · Personal Income · Employment · Government Revenue Effects Visitor Spending I I I I I Food & Beverage Lodging Retail Other Direct Effects Food & Beverage Lodging Retail Other I Local Direct Loca I Non-local Non-local Non-local Industry Household Government Industry Household Government Purchases Income Revenue Purchases Income Revenue Indirect Effects Local Di rect Local Non-local Non-local Non-local Industry Household Government Industry Household Government Purchases Income Revenue Purchases Income Revenue Local Savings Non-local Household Household Purchases Purchases I Other Port Angeles Businesses I Induced Effects 1 Other Port Angeles Businesses .. .. " Local Secondary Local Non-local Non-local Non-local Industry Household Government Industry Household Government Purchases Income Revenue Purchases Income Revenue Local Savings Non-local Household Household Purchases Purchases ,r ,r ,r Sports Tournament Questionnaire Team City How Many Days Spent Food &. Beverage Lodging Reta i I First Visit Plans To Return Other Special Events Expenditures Other Survey Results How Many Traveled................27 Average Group Size................3.7 Group is classified as - those people whom you payor are responsible for Group Stayed...................2 Days, 1 Night First Trip To Port Angeles ...........110/0 Return To Port Angeles ..............960/0 Room Nights ..............................2,150 Survey Results Continued The following figures are based on the average group size of 3.7 people staying one night and two days in Port Angeles. Food & Beverage............... $109.00 Lod gin g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 95.00 FtE!tail...................................$5~.00 at her. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $16.00 Group Total......................... $2 7~.00 en OJ U 1- :J o en OJ ~ (/) l... ro - - o o >< ro I- o o o ..... ,...-I M -EfT . (/) (]J U .- (/) > l... l... Q) ::J OJ -.. en O (J) Q) -...::> en en +J :r: -0::> L... c C en ~ Q) Ln .- c I E ~ ~ :c a. N I = ~ '5 ..... C ::J -I-J e- N ....... CO (/) w . 2002 Totals ~25, Events --.- --- \ ~8,OOO Visitors ~$980,000 Economic Impact ~$650,OOO Direct Expenditures ~Supporting The Equivalent 26 FT Jobs Seven Year History Invested . 12,000 Hours Of In Kind Services . $166,000 in Tax Dollars Impact Totals . 160 Events . 41,500 Visitors . $5,400,000 Of Economic Impact . $3,600,000 Of Direct Expenditures . Supporting the Equivalent of 160 FT Jobs M • • DATE: To: FROM: SUBJECT: NGELE WASH ING T O N, PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT November 19, 2002 MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL Glenn Cutler, Public Works and Utilities Director Institutional Network Construction Status Report This is an informational report on Northland Cable Television, Inc. (Northland) and Capacity Provisioning, Inc. (C.P.I.) Institutional Network construction activities during the month of October 2002. Below is a summary of Northland's activities: 1. Construction of about 2 miles of overhead fiber optic cabling was completed. 2. The backordered node enclosures arrived on October 29`''. 3. Northland's franchise is being sold to Wave Division Networks, LLC and the City will be asked to approve of a transfer of the franchise in the near future. Due to the delayed arrival of the node enclosures, the anticipated date of completion for the fiber link and node construction was revised from 10/21/2002 to 11/13/02. Below is a summary of C.P.I.'s activities: 1. The majority of the distribution and site drop fiber optic cable has been installed. Splicing and installation of demarcation panels are underway. 2. The node equipment, customer premises equipment, and edge gear for utility sites has all been ordered. 3. Meetings were held to discuss the plans, specifications, and cost schedule for local area networks which must be submitted for City review and approval on or before 11/25/2002. 4. Substantial progress was made on their network operating center which is located at the new technology center. Due to the Northland delay, up to a 3 -week delay is anticipated for C.P.I., which bumps the date that services would be available to the City from 12/23/2002 to 1/13/2003. N\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\metconstrucuonsummary wpd 143 • • • 144 Pages 145 & 146 Intentionally left blank 145 146 I Washington State Public Works Board Post Office Box' 48319 Olympia, Washington 98504-8319 November 7, 2002 R ECE . NOV 121 \l E D 2002' MR. GARY KENWORTHY CITY OF PORT ANGELES 321 E FIFTH ST PO BOX 1150 PORT ANGELES, W A 98362 Regarding: 2003 Public Works Trust Construction Application for DOWNTOWN W A TERMAIN REPLACEMENT PHASE III Dear MR: KENWORTHY: The Public Works Board met on November 5, 2002 to determine the final recommended ]islof construction loan projects that will move forward to the Legislature for financing. As you will recall, this year the Board delayed making a recommendation until the November 2002 meeting in order to secure the maximum amount . of resources for the list. After an exhaustive search for resources, the Board determined that it has $16 million in existing appropriation, and the ability to request and additional $58 million in supplemental authorization. Although this enabled the Board to fund 27 of the 107 projects, the Board was faced with the difficult choice of having to leave critical projects without financial assistance this year.. I regret to inform you that the Board was unable to recommend the project referenced above for financing through the PWTF 2003 Construction Loan program. I am available to meet with you andyour staff to discuss the other options for your project, which would enable you to move forward with part of your project. Please call me at (360) 725-5007, or e-mail: Leslie.Hafford@pwb.wa.gov, to schedule a meeting date. Thank you for applying to the Public Works Trust Fund, and I look forward to working with you in the future. Please call me if I can be of any assistance. Sincerely, kUv~ . LESLIE HAFFORD Regional Account Executive cag Administrative services provided by the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (360) 725-5000 Fax (360) 6~9j9 Web site: www.pwb.wa.gov . . 0" . 148 . . . MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION Port Angeles, Washington 98362 October 23, 2002 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Bob Philpott, Fred Hewins, Fred Norton, Chuck Schramm, Mary Craver, Leonard Rasmussen Members Excused: Rick Porter Staff Present: Brad Collins, Scott Johns Public Present: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Hewins moved to approve the minutes with a correction by staff as to who seconded the motion to approve the minutes of the of the September 25, 2002 meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Rasmussen and passed 5-0 with Commissioner Philpott abstaining due to his absence at the October 9, 2002. PUBLIC HEARING: None COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC None. ST AFF REPORTS Associate Planner Scott Johns presented the newly received site plan, landscape plan, floor plans and building elevations of the proposed downtown hotel/conference center (SMA 02-06 & CUP 02-07). Changes to the original project included relocating the building so that no portion ofthe building that is taller than 35 feet would be located within 200 feet of the shoreline as determined by Department of Ecology. Other changes included the removal of the parking on the north side ofthe building, the addition of 15 guest rooms, and a recalculated area ofthe building footprint. Discussion ofthe project followed. Staff presented additional findings and conclusions and recommended that they be adopted. Commissioner Rasmussen moved to concur with stafrs recommendation and adopt the additional 3 findings and 5 conclusions. Commissioner Philpott seconded the motion which failed 3-3. Commissioner Hewins moved with regard to SMA 02-06, add a fourth finding stating that 149 the building would be 45,052 square feet in area and contain 165 rooms, amend condition #3 to read 351 parking spaces and to add the proposed findings #s 1,2, and 3 and the 5 ' conclusions (correctly numbered) proposed by staff, to read as follows. Conditions of Approval 3. The project must provide a parking plan that is acceptable to the City showing a minimum of:336 351 parking spaces before any building permits are issued. Findings After receiving revised project plans on October 23, 2002, the following findings are added to SMA 02-06. . 19. The building has been moved out of the shoreline area except for a small portion which is no greater than 35 feet in height. 20. The parking has been removed from shoreline jurisdiction area. 21. Moving the building closer to Front Street has increased the open space area between the building and the shoreline. 22. The building footprint covers 45.052 square feet and will contain 165 guest rooms. Conclusions After receiving revised project plans on October 23, 2002, the following conclusions are added to SMA 02-06. . 14. The building is closer to the street. making it more consistent with CBD zero setback requirement. 15. Because of the relocation. the building height will have less impact on nearshore environment and on views from the top of the marine bluff along Second Street. 16. Removal of impervious surfaces for on-site parking between the building and shoreline ", will reduce stormwater impacts. 17. With the relocation of the building. the need for a shoreline height variance becomes moot. 18. The revised site plan is consistent with the Planning Commission's approval of CUP 02- 07 and SMA 02-06. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Norton and carried 6-0. Commissioner Hewins moved with regard to CUP 02-07, add a fourth finding stating that the building would be 45,052 square feet in area and contain 165 rooms, amend condition #1 to read 351 parking spaces and to add the proposed findings #s 1,2, and 3 and the 5 conclusions (correctly numbered) proposed by staff, to read as follows. Conditions: . 150 . . . 1. The project must provide a parking plan that is acceptable to the City showing a minimum of:336 351 parking spaces before any building permits are issued. , Findings: After receiving revised project plans on October 23, 2002, the following findings are added to CUP 02-07. 22. The building has been moved out of the shoreline area except for a small portion which is no greater than 35 feet in height. 23. The parking has been removed from shoreline iurisdiction area. 24. Moving the building closer to Front Street has increased the open space area between the building and the shoreline. 25. The building footprint covers 45.052 square feet and will contain 165 guest rooms. Conclusions: After receiving revised project plans on October 23, 2002, the following conclusions are added to CUP 02-07. 17. The building is closer to the street. making it more consistent with CBD.zero setback requirement. 18. Because of the relocation. the building height will have less impact on nearshore environment and on views from the top ofthe marine bluff along Second Street. 19. Removal of impervious surfaces for on-site parking between the building and shoreline will reduce stormwater impacts. 20. With the relocation ofthe building. the need for a shoreline height variance becomes moot. 21. The revised site plan is consistent with the Planning Commission's approval of CUP 02-07 and SMA 02-06. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Norton and passed 6-0. Associate Planner Johns presented a PowerPoint presentation on the upcoming Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle, describing ideas and issues that may be considered during the process. Director Collins discussed the need for community visioning and how that might happen. He also invited commission members to attend the Port Angeles Forward meeting scheduled for Monday. October 28,2002; where the Comprehensive Plan amendment process would be introduced and Port Angeles Forward invited to participate. REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS Commissioner Philpott related some of his recent urban experiences in New York City. 151 ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:40 pm. Brad Collins, Secretary PREPARED BY: S. Johns 152 Chuck Schramm, Chair . . .~ ~ Q en z ,~~ OC/) ..Jz ~ Q. ' <!);j I w:::;: <!) ~ w ~ JAM FEB . Y~ATER DEMAND AVERAGE DAIL :lAST YEAR TO DATE (MG) iTMIS YEAR TO DATE IMG) CITY OF PORT A:G~~~~ DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS HLY REPORT MONT . OCTOBER 2002 . WATER DEMAN~_ .... .... o 2001 . 2002 a.07! 3.27\ !SEWER SYSTEM JETTED ls10RM DRAINS-JETTED !SYSTEM TV INSPECTED MAINTENANCE RlSTORM SYSTEM . I MONTH I") I SEWE : ,.6321 I YR. 1 , 63.4191 1 1.060\ , 4,3191 ALTONS LANDFILL ANNU 01 : 703' . LANDFILL DISPOSAL' I TOTAL rl~;.,t:) 36.482 i 37,848 i RAINFALL , r- I L L L ...J ...J "' ct w LL :I: ~ !i1 ~ - 3 L ,fEll ..... . - 10 Vea, Aver-oe o 200' _ 2002 DATA (Inches) RAINFALL . i'OYRAVG. TOTAl lOOATE ITHIS YR TO DATE lRECORD HIGH THIS MONTH IRE CORD lOW THIS MONTH ICAL USE AVERAGE ELECTR ilAST YEAR TO DATE (M Kwh) i1H'S YEAR TO DATE 1M f(wh) ".INS ~ 17.71\ 22..51 7.701 0.001 TEMPERATURE ~ I i ..... .-. 10 Year Average o 200' _ 2002 ELECTRICAL USAGE w ~ . (/)......to t ~:I: . ...J ~ ~: t3 .~ )0 ~ ~ ~ I .... -~ U W ...J W 153 PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITY DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT WATER Repaired 1 two inch water main break Cflang~ out 5 nonfunctional water meters Repaired 3 waler service leaks Installed 4 new waler services Replaced 1 six inch water valve that had a broken shah Removed old and installed new fire hydrant Added extensions to two existing fire hydrants for project 20-31 Conducted six by six inch "Hot Tap" for Cresenl Water District Replaced backflow assembly for Police Oept. upstairs storage area Renewed tlNO inch galvanized line on south side of 6th SI. between K & L WASTEWATER COLLECTION Installed new check valve on pump #1 at sewer pump station #1 COntinued sewer locates and dye testing for confirmation of now directk>n Perfonned utility locates for Scheduled constNction projects Assisted Port of Pt. Angeles cleaning their stormwater collection system Assisted in repairing stormwater pumping system at Stevens Middle School WASTEWATER TREATMENT NPDES monthly report showed no violations WOrked with local disChargers on pretreatment issues Reptaced galvanized support cable with stainless steal on Trickling Filler Supt. attended Pacific Northwest Clean Water Assn. conference Submitted ro-oomposting plan to Clallam COunty DeD and Ihe DOE COmpleted monthly EPA and DOE testing and monitoring Replaced some underground hydronic lines at the Dewatering Building Land applied biosolids and collected monitoring well samples Staff aUended compost lab training at King County Environmental Lab I EQUIPMENT SERVICES Work Orders: 123 Service Requests from Denvers Tire: 27 I. Service Orders: 25 Full maintenance services by Denvers: 14 #0020 Dodge Sedan - New decals, detailed cleaning #0087 Ford Sedan - Installed plastic on rear seat back & new window deck #0136 Dodge Pickup. Replaced lAC motor, key switch, and fusible link #0162 Bucket T~. Repaired brakes & balancer pulley, new thennostat #1511 Sign Truck - Fixed lock, replaced PCM, new power train control #1562 Street Sweeper. ReplaCed elevator belts and main broom #1568 PatCh Truck - Repaired taCk tank, pump gauge wiring, and door #1580 Street Sweeper. Installed gutter brooms, repaired leak & fan botts #1604 Fiatallis Loader. Prepared vehide for service #1616 Ford Range~'- Prepared vehicle for service #1870 Tractor .-RePlaCed brakes, bearings, lock tab, and differential carrier #1905 Refuse Packer. New wiring, repaired leak, fixed open circuit in strobe #1907 Refuse Packer. Repaired tailgate, steering column boot. ~rip cylinder #1911 Refuse Packer. Repaired transmission, prepared engine for rebuild #1915 Compactor - Replaced turbO, new weather cap on exhaust #1916 10 yd Dump Truck. Replaced wiring, fixed air leak. new rear window #192O Refuse Packer. Repaired hyd. leak, replaced leak springs #1921 Refuse Packer. Replaced grease lines, packer link, new monitor i LIGHT OPERATIONS Completed conduit installation for fiber Pulled fiber into all sub stations Ran power to 26 fiber sites Changed and tested 39 meters Investigated three customer billing complaints ~ 90k1 ..~ ~o~" ~~~ ..~ ~~l <t'~,s<"" ,,,,",,,,.If:> . -- I SOLID WASTE I I, RECYCLING: Hamilton SchoOl presentation to all 5th graders Distributed falllwinter yard waste and holiday collection schedule Taped four "Recycled Man" segments and rerorded "Trash Talk" Prepared EPA pre-proposal grant application COLLECTIONS: Total 90s placed for conversion: 2,557 ReQuests for recyding services in conversion area: 434 Special collections due to conversion: 30 Special COllections: 102 Note: Special Collections now has 102 residents on the route wilh a total of 166 cans. The average collection in October equaled 1900 Ibs. per week. STREET I Asphalt repairs: Skin & pothole patches citywide, major patch on 12th 51. Preparation and ove~ay at 7th & Liberty. 285' + 18' Preparation and ovet1ay at Lauridsen Blvd. and Chase. 35' + g' Repaired asphalt utility cuts al 5 locations Repaired concrete sidewalks at 5 locations Built shoulders, rais~ catch basin, and installed rock wall at 7th & Liberty Assisted Solid Waste with- special collections and containers Replaced bricks in downtown aosswalks Citywide. mowing. grading. grinding, educting. and sweeping Fixed roof and water damage at the Senior Center Repaired roof and gutters at the COrp Yard Prepared & painted curbs, built & erected new signs, general maintenance Participated in HTE Training, First Aid Training, and CDL Training Monthly Safety Meeting . i ENGINEERING I . CroWn Part design support Circuit Switcher design contract su~rt Elwha Dam removal mitigation support 1 & I Pilot Program suppon Gateway Project design support 2002 Tree Trimming Awarded Laurel Street Slide Repair support HTE suppon Waterfront Trail: Rayonier to Lee's Creek design support Signal design: 5th and Race Cone Cyln water1ine design support Carnegie Library constl'\JCtion support Valley Street Erosion Repair. no bids . detayed . Fire Hall Roof Repair <Jesign support Front Street SkJewalk construction support Lauridsen Blvd. Sidewalk awarded I' Street Sidewalk awarded Warehouse Mezzanine construction support 2002 Electric design contract suppon Sewer Replacement design support PCB Warehouse bid support Front Street Water1ine Replacement awarded Landfill Drainage awarded . 154 . F' OR'T":P1.. N'''G''''E'''L'.E'''S' i /;" _: j' '.; i : / :. :;.;~ '. : ' :1. ~. , . oJ " ; .... ,. .. , . , ' , ....' ,I' . /m .' ... "f . . ..... . ..,. ..mm..> . ....... ..' . . , ..!,' WAS H I N G TON,' U. S. A. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DA TE: November 19,2002 To: Mayor Wiggins and City Council Members FROM: Sue Roberds, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Department of Community Development Planning Division October, 2002 - Monthly Report CURRENT PLANNING ApPLICATIONS: CURRENT MONTH 2002 YTD 2001 YTD Rezone 0 5 5 Municipal Code Amendment 0 0 2 Conditional Use Permit 0 7 13 Conditional Use Permit Extension 0 3 0 Conditional Use Permit Appeal 0 2 0 Annexation 0 2 0 . Subdivision 0 1 0 Short Plat 1 6 1 Appeal of Short Subdivision Decision 0 2 0 Boundary Line Adjustment 1 8 1 Home Occupation Permit 0 2 2 Retail Stand Permit 0 1 2 Bed and Breakfast Permit 0 2 4 Variance 0 5 11 Minor Deviation 0 0 1 Street Vacation 0 1 4 Parking Variance 0 0 0 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 2 5 7 Shoreline Exemption 0 2 4 Wetland Permit 0 0 0 Environmentally Sens. Areas 0 10 4 SEP A ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: Determinations ofNonSignificance 2 31 29 Mitigated Determinations of Non Significance 0 0 4 Determinations of Significance 0 I 0 SEPA Appeal 0 1 0 . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ApPLlCA TlONS: Building Permit 10 99 25 Code Enforcement 0 2 6 Clearing and Grading Permit 155.Jl ..Q ~ 16 207 130 DEPARTMEN10F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MONTHL YPERMIT REPORT lOCTOBER . 20021. ..... c.n 0. CATEGORY JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. 2002 YTD 2001 YTD RESIDENTIAL-NEW . MODULAR I MOBILE 1 2 1 2 6 7 ...........-....................;:;;g7iiii.......'..-.................. '.B..........."......_.............. ...................,.................. ....-.......-.............. ..................................... .....-....".................,........... .......-............................. ...........$',:..200............. .................."'..................". ............................",.......... ,........................................ .........."............................. .............."."..................... .........$22.2';9.1.9.._.... .....m................................_... $91.840 $31.550 $98.329 $439,071 ......,.............~!,~~.~.~..F.:~~~.~:!........_..... 1 2 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 28 19 .......$.i'40;07S.. -"$217.i35"-' -"$518.'399- .-..,........,--...... .....---...-.................. .-..............-.........- '''-'$429;76i-' -............-..........-.. "-$'60',;'605--" .........-......-."....... ".."...........--.-.......... .M.._....................,.......... ......s..:i;4'1'8-;ii19-- '-'S"2;322';5'02'-' Value $209,099 $389.697 $538.625 $374.419 .........._._~.y.~.!.!.:F.:~~...!k~......_. 1 1 ......--.....-....-- --....-- --..-..-.. .....--.---.... .-.---., ...................---........ ... ..----- ....$250.000--. ___M"'''___ .----........"'.. .."'...................---..... .....$.25.0:0'0"0-_.... __.._m...................... Value ...._.___~~E.:~~2R'ES_.._. 1 __.2..___ 1 3 6 8 4 5 33 18 ---....-....-.......--. ""'-'''''''...-- .--..---., --..-- --S3S,'77j"o-' .....-.......---.. --.......---.. ..........."'...---. ----"....--- .-........."...........-- ......"'.-.....-"............ "-'$37'2;21;-. "'......$'.14~576"'......'. Value $7.000 $45.076 $20.000 $78,303 $86. 149 $55,115 $41.928 COMMERCIAL-NEW RETAIL 1 ................."..,,-.................. ..---....................."....... "',..........................."..."... ........................,......"......... ............................"...',...... ......,.....,,,...................,,.... 1 .....................................................---.........."'.., .......................................... ...................................... ..................-............... "....$SO.OOO...... ,..............-................. .................M...M"__....... ...........$'iiO~ooo...._,..... ................"'...................-..... Value .....................f.:l2!.~I,!.~.2,!.~L...._..... .M....................................... ...................................." .-................................. ..."................""............ .....".................................... ........................................ .-....-...--............... .M.............._..................... ."........"............................ .......................................... ........................."...".....". ..................."........."........ .".................."....................... ........................".."................ Value ......................__...9.F.:.F.:'gE_...."'........._.... 1 . ...................__.~......... .....---........"'............... 1 2 -.-...........--..-....... ....-.-.--....-..- .---.-...--.. ---- --............- ...-....-.............-.- .......-.....--...-. '_""M__'''_'''' .-......--...............-... ......"'..................-- ._-$250;0'0'0......... .-..-............".."'.....-......... Value $250.000 5395,000 ...............Q.~..~!;J.c:;.P.J~~.__ 1 1 .-.....-........---.- .--...-...-.................. ......-..-. "'-"- ---. --. ......--...-...-... .-...--........--....... ...-..--....... ""---"'-"'- ...-.........--.....-...- -.....-.................-.-.. .--...-.....---.......... ..--.-.....-......-.."....... Value $7,500 $7,500 ._...............,~1:!.!.2!~E!1Y.~__._. 1 ...--.......--....-... ......-....-- .....-........-............ -...--- ... ....--- "--'''''''--' .-..----...-... ....-.........-...-.. ----.-..-. ........--......-...--. ..................................- -..--.....-.............. ......-........"...-.................... Value 551,200 ........................!!;Jg~.:r.:~1!1..~__..._..... 2 .........................--.......... ................................"....... 2 ........~............_-_. .--....---. -...- ---.....---.... ...-.-.............---..... .-....................-..... .-....--"............. ----.... '''--'''-''''''''''''-'''' ................... ................... .........$489;'000........... ........-................................... Value $489,000 PUBLIC - NEW ...m..'~,g.f.:l,9.2~..S.!.f.:l9..~~.!:r.:!I..~.s......, 1 1 ............".m...~............._....... 6 ....-................................... ...................................... .........-...-.........-- .-"....."........-. ....-.-..-.............--. ...-..................-.... .......------.. .....-$7j--;9aO..-.- .--...."....................... .......................................... ........................-............. ....."...."........................... ............-.............--.......... Value $20.000 $91,900 $611,005 .............._........gf.:l.lJ..~g'::i..~.~...._..__.. 1 .-...........-.................. ....-.......---..-. .---.".---......-. ..,,_................................. ......................-............... 1 .._...................._...M__.... ....._$..12:000-... ....._...............__M._ -....... --...-,,-......... --............,,-................ .........-..-.-.. .._...M.M...._....M....._...... ..._-$12';0'00-....... Value .._......._.......!!~9_':l~~.:r~............ ---...-. ..----".-..- ._....._...M........._.... .......---................. ................._MM............".. 2 .__"'''M_'''_'''_' .-...--...- .----. --- --- --......- -"'- ....-.--.....--.............. ......-$".26..;587-........ Value REPAIR & ALT. , ._--........"'......~~~.!'?.~,':!.!.!~!:........._._.. 37 26 47 44 45 55 49 45 60 61 469 434 '-$"li0,625"-' .......$85:035-- '-$'236~9i7"- ..............._..."_......_M .--$347;'2'ii...._... '_'M""'_""'_'"''''''''_''' "'-"$"j"iil:4'2ij'-" ....."'$33.7:7:iS-... .....$2'2":..S33.-.... ....................".................... ............-.......................... ......................."."............ ......$2.;2'55:.345........ "".$1';635;4'98 ....... Value $239,418 $302, 769 $192,364.. ......................92.~,~.~.~9.~~~.........._....., 11 8 10 11 12 5 10 14 14 8 103 123 ........$54:.94;"'....... "'-"$';'6."720"--- -i5i.'6Ii:;"-' .....$"'105,557....... ..-..............-...."............... ........$,'2.'560-- ............................................ .....-.$75:.0S.1.......... .......$.''!i'i;4.:;S.....' "--$35;766.:...." ......................................... ....-................................. ....$'1';2'8'7.:4'68"...... '''-S2;553;829'''''''' Value $657.650 $125.028 .......__.......................~y..~.~!,~........................... 1 4 2 2 2 3 2 ................................--. .......................................... 16 6 '......$250:-/JOO......... .........$9:442.......... ....$'I'i'6:soo-.. ..-.$S:5'OO.."..... .......$45:360._- "'-$220:"i'52-' .-.,,--...--.,,--. '--$sii9:680'-- ......................................... .........."............................ -....$1':556:634'....... .......S1':.174':575."... Value ...........g.~_9..~I.!..12!;!L~2Y.~........ 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 8 9 ........-.$500..-.......... .-...-$500...... .--,,--.....--...... ..-..........---..... ..--.-.---...-- '--'$500'-- '-'$500-"'- -Ssoo''''--'' ..-.........--..-....... ....--....................-........ ......................................... ........................................ _........$4;'500 .....--. ......-..............--................ Value $1,500 $500 $4,500 . BUilDING TOTALS .."......,,!?..h-Q~...E.~B.M!..I~............ 54 42 63 68 65 _..._?"'L- .__.._2~.._._ 76 83 75 0 0 672 627 --.............-......... ................-..-....... .....-...--- ...----... -....- -......--..--.. ....--.......--- ..-..-.....--.....-..... ..-..-........................... ..........."...........-.......... --............................."......... ......-..................-................ __._CON~T.. VA~_S- 5615,145 $578,832 $924,523 $777,990 $1,491,468 $1,113,306 $1,292,720 $1,953,783 $1,280,031 $270,558 _!L_. $0 $10,298,356 59,428,343 ......-.--...-....... SLDG PERMITS FEE $8,375 $9,264 $15,123 514,913 $22,530 $18,622 $21,385 $26,595 $20,156 $7,403 5164,365 5136,618 OTHER PERMITS R I W CONSTR. 7 3 3 6 13 14 11 6 10 7 ._- 80 63 -i~ ...-.-.....--. -s9;'390-m .----................. Revenue $1.155 $320 $135 $470 $1.255 $1,440 $1.485 $555 $1.825 $6,010 NEW WATER SERVo 5 2 2 5 13 8 12 8 7 6 68 .__~.s._..."'_.... -.....-...--.. --'-'-'" ......--.....-- --s53~935- Revenue $3.790 $1.280 $1.665 $2.990 $12.210 $6.170 $9.905 $6,170 $5:145 $4.610 $27,1130 NEW SEWER SERVo 6 1 2 4 14 13 11 8 9 5 _"...................___.M 73 44 ........ --'$1,820-- -s;is- '-"$840 $3.360 ..........$.,;'005............ ...--.--.-................ --$2'6-;-,60-" ...-....-................-.......... Revenue $1.680 $5.880 $5.190 $4.295 $2,745 $14,715 CW-PER~~ 18 6 7 15 40 3S~ 22 I-....~-_.. 18 0 0 221 -.= Mil REV. "'S6-;7sS- '-i1.64~ -S2,640 $5,140 5111,345 $12,800- 85 $10,085 $9,715 .-$6,365.'- -'-........$0..-. .-......-SO"--- -S'90,l'SS-' A lied 87 Issued 75 86. Complete pp THE: CITY OF' J? ~. . .) '" . ;.Oi(LC,€ ...._,;.:. ','., , '".' -:/_'.' "~.;.': --, ,h':' ,;.,.,~> 157 . Mission Statement: In partnership with our community, the Port Angeles Police Department recognizes its mission to serve tn a compassionate, courteous, and professional manner, to promote freedom and peace of mind, pride in our neighborhoods, and the safety of our families. ~ On June 11, 2002, at approximately 7:20 p.m., a 62-year-old Port Angeles woman was driving her 1995 Mercury Sable southbound on Vine Street. Her vehicle was struck by a 1978 Chrysler heading eastbound. Witnesses at the scene estimated the Chrysler was traveling in excess of 50 m.p.h. The woman suffered severe chest injuries including a broken sternum. The driver and three occupants of the Chrysler ran from the scene but several of the witnesses to the accident followed them. At that time no one could place the suspect as the driver of the Chrysler. After officers questioned the suspect, he was released and the case was forwarded to the detective division. This investigation was complicated by the fact that ownership of the Chrysler had ,changed several times in the past several months, although official transfers were not filed with authorities. Further investigation eventually lead police to determine that the suspect was both the owner and driver of the vehicle at the time of" the accident. Investigation also determined the identities of the three juvenile passengers. On October 1, 2002, after searching for weeks, police located and arrested the 29- year-old male for felony hit and run and vehicular assault in connection with the accident. The case is being referred to the Prosecutor. [!JOn Friday morning, October 4, 2002 at approximately 3:45 a.m., a lone male entered the Round the Clock Deli, 722 S. Lincoln Street, and robbed the clerk at gun point. The gunman took cash from, the till, and two cartons of cigarettes, then fled westbound from the store. The suspect was wearing a scarf over his face and a grey' stocking cap. He was described as a white male in his late 20's, about 5'-9" and very slim with a blotchy complexion. The suspect wore a black, loose- fitting sweatshirt that had a hood and a round colored emblem on the front. That same day, at approximately 3:45 p.m., Port Angeles detectives arrested and incarcerated a 26-year-old male ,for the armed robbery of the Round The, Clock Deli. The suspect was arrested at a residence in the 100 block of west 3rd Street. After the suspect's apprehension, detectives acquired and served a search warrant at that location. Among' the property seized by police were' items identified as having been taken in the armed robbery, along with drugs arid drug paraphernalia .In addition, to his arrest for armed robbery, the suspect was also booked on an outstanding felony warrant for first degree escape, (from community custody), as well as three misdemeanor warrants for theft, vehicle prowling, and trespassing. . Within the week, detectives located the gun used in the robbery and arrested three additional co-conspirators for their individual involvement in the robbery. Arrested were an 18-year-old male, a 34- . Page 1 158 !- year-old female, and 21-year-old male all from . , Port Angeles. The arrested female also faces . additional charges for possession of narcotics. All those arrested are alleged users of methamphetamine. . ooSaturday, October 5, 2002 at approximately 2:45 a.m., police officers were summoned to the area of the 400 block of East Fifth Street on a report of several teens prowling through cars parked in the neighborhood. Officers located two young men walking in an alley. One of the men had an op?,led pocket knife in his hand. Upon contacting and identifying the youths, officers discovered that the 18-year old man with the knife had two outstanding felony warrants out of Superior Cou~. The warrants were for failing to obey court orders. When taking the suspect into custody, police discovered a 150,000 volt stun gun along with narcotics paraphernalia on the suspect's person. Residue on the par a ph ern a I i ate s t e d po sit i v e fo r methamphetamine. The suspect was booked into corrections pending arraignment. . ooTuesday, October 8, 2002 approximately 8:00 p.m. , while at Erickson Playfield, a 15-year-old male and three S~ his friends parked their bikes. An unidentifieG' man was observed loading the victim's chrome, BMX bike into the trunk of a small, square body vehicle, that was silver in color. The other two boys gave chase on their bikes but backed off when a passenger in the suspect's vehicle allegedly displayed a silver colored handgun. The boys then returned to the home of the victim and notified his mother who . ' called police. Police have requested assistance from the community to locate the suspects. If anyone was in the area. of Erickson Playfield on that date and time, and you feel you may have seen anything in connection with this crime, please contact the Port . Angeles Holice Department Detectives Division. . ooOn October 9, 2002, at approximately 6:30 p.m., Detective Winfield observed a vehicle being driven . recklessly in the area of Ennis Creek Road. Detective. Winfield began to follow the vehicle and monitor the driver's actions. The suspicious vehicle drove into a parking lot off an alley near Liberty Street and the driver suddenly ran from the car. Detective Winfield recognized the suspect and knew the 29-year old male had several outstanding felony warrants. The suspect led the detective on a foot pursuit that ended several blocks later on the access road to the old Rayonier site, at which point the suspect 'gave up and was taken into custody without further incident. There were a total of six felony warrants for the suspect's arrest. The warrants were issued for crimes including attempting to elude a police vehicle and multiple narcotics related violations. ooPolice arrested a 31-year-old male for second degree unlawful possession of a firearm, (being a convicted felon in possession of a handgun), and first degree possession of stolen property (the handgun), on October 15, 2002, at approximately 4: 15 p.m. The. arrest follows an investigation which began the previous afternoon at approximately 5:00 p.m. when the suspect observed an unmarked police vehicle in the 1000 block of W. 15th. Upon spotting the detective car, the suspect appeared to try and hide from the detective in some tall grass between two garages in the alley. When located, the suspect claimed he had just gone into the backyard at that location to get an apple. Detective Winfield noted he did not have an apple with him. Without other evidence police could not detain the suspect and allowed him to leave on his own accord. When K-9 Arco and his handler Corporal Miller arrived minutes later Corp. Miller directed Arco in a crime scene search and the d9g immediately hit on a direct line to the location where the suspect had been. The dog indicated he found something of importance and began digging through a pile of leaves and debris between the two garages. Moments later Arco emerged with a revolver in a brown holster. Page 2 159 " ~'r The gun, a Smith and Wesson .357 revolver, was loaded with HydroShok ammunition. Police learned the gun belonged to the suspect's sister and had been stolen from her home. Police also confirmed that the suspect had three convictions of felony level criminal conduct and cannot possess a firearm. The " suspect was also in community custody (electronic home monitoring) for other unrelated criminal activity. The suspect was located and taken into custody without incident and the case referred to the prosecutor . , Leland L. Lee joined the Police Volunteers on September 2, 1997 and was always ready to assist the department with any task. He turned in countless hours doing the radar speed watch, vacation home checks, attend- ing meetings, civic events, and taking the court work over to the county each morn- mg. ' Leland served on the Port Angeles Police Department Law Enforcement Advisory Board since 1993. He was elected as chair- man of the board in 1994. Our sincere sympathy to the family, he talked about you all often. We all miss his sincerity, his positive atti- tude, and his great smile. . . Congratulations to the members of Port Angeles Police Department who joined the department in the month of October, from 1990 to 2001! . Page 3 160 I . . . Each Halloween the Port Angeles Police Department has special treats avail- ", abl~ for children. This year we had some very special visitors. The Port Angeles Police Department Annual Report for 2002 will be printed and distributed by January 20, 2003. Letter received October 23, 2002 ]rom LeRo)' Martin, President and General Mana8er of Port An8eles Ford Lincoln MerciJry. "Thank you for providing Officer Tom Kuch as part of our dealership's "Commitment to Kids" event on October 19, 2002. OffiCer Kuch was an outstanding participant. He ' worked well with approximately 50 children at our business. We very much appreciated his kindness and his expertise. Families feel safer knowing there are professional, commit- ted persons like Officer Tom I<uch in our community." o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4/f4/f4/f4/f4/f4/fi?4/f o 0 4/f i? o 0 4/f i? o 0 4/f 4/f o 0 'i? 'i? o ' 0 4/f 'i? o 0 4/f 'i? o 0 4/f 4/f o 0 4/f 4/f o 0 4/f 4/f o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4/fi?i?4.?4.?4.?4.?4/f Our Police Department Volun- teers provided 60.5 hours of service during the month of October, 2002. A large ma- jority of this time was dedi- cated to office work, district court, vacation house checks, and radar/speed watch. Total Volunteer hours for 2002 838.5 Page 4 161 LAW ENFORCEMENT ADVISORY BOARD October 23.2002 Attendees: Jim Jones, Jr., Vice-Chairman Leonard Beil David Brewer Joe Girard Dennis Wilcox Melissa Schaad Sgt. Steve Coyle Guests: Officer Al Brusseau and K9 Kilo . Call to Order: Vice Chairman Jim Jones called the meeting to order at 6:35 pm. Minutes: The minutes from September 25,2002 were approved as written. Communications and Letters: There were no communications or letters. Committee Reports: There were no committee reports. Agenda Items 1. Introduction of new student member Missy Schaad'. 2. Robbery @ Lincoln Park Sgt. Coyle showed a video of the robbery and discussed the search by the City, County and State Law Enforcement teams. 3. Animal Control Dennis Wilcox talked about the proposed animal control ordinance for Board questions and comments. This ordinance is. based on the Clallam County Sheriffs Office ordinance and is consistent with new state laws. The County has started an Animal Issues Advisory Committee that Chief Riepe will be serving on to review the current state of the Clallam County Humane Society. Due to budget cuts (which will be discussed later), the Animal Control position will be cut for 2003. Some concerns about how Animal Control within the City will be carried out were discussed. 4. Kilo was introduced and AI Brusseau answered questions about new K9 training. 5. Question about appropriate way for LEAB to recognize Leland Lee's passing and huge contribution to the P.A. Police Department and the citizens of Port Angeles. Suggestion that Jim Jones talk with Chief Riepe about possible city council recognition, speakers at the memorial service, sending card to Lucille, etc... 6. Motion was made to elect Jim Jones, Jr. as Chairman, to replace Leland was made by David Brewer, seconded by Len Beil and passed unanimously. 7. David Brewer announced that he must resign his position as he is moving to Sequim at the end of October. 8. Joe Girard reported about his participation in the Meth Action Team conference. 9. Items for the next agenda: Community Service vs. Jailing pros & cons. There being no further business, Len Beil moved we adjourn at 7:55 PM. Respectfully submitted, Jim Jones, Jr. Chairman . Page 5 162 . . . PEN COM ACTIVITY PAPD CFS (Calls for Service) DISPATCHES FOR PAPD 1606 1529 16,469 15,572 I G Month III 20021 I G Month 11I20021 COUNTYWIDE 911 CALLS 2453 24,165 [ G Month 11I20021 ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY 2002 ARRESTS 245 108 17 906 Juvenile Adult Adult A t f Arrests for Juvenile Arrests for rres s or y Arrests for Month Year ear month Page 6 163 . TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS For The Month 70 6.5 60 50 39 40 30 22 20 12 16 8 11 11 10 .1 1.1. 11 0 I 0 ~~ r-:>rz, ,,(j .o~ ~ ~ -.. ~ ,,~ . vrz, rz, . (sib' C;'''J V ~ca ~-: , 0<< ~~ .,vrz, vrz, ~o<< e:;~ o e}v l~~ 00 .~....o '1o.'C .~ v .~~ /.~ <v+~ <::)" ,~Cj <<~ .... ,,~ ~c f:Jrz, C;'''J ..J..,'C cP '..0 0 ~ ,\0 << ~ ~o <<0. .~~ ~rz, .~~ ..,o~ r-:>rz, ra<" ~ ,,0 .,,-: .". ~ O~ ra'C 0- v <::)<"" (,fJ-Ib' ,...,v.rz, e:;<< ",0 ~ -.. " v ~ O' rz,Y ~ rz,v ;::J /$::-CfJ <Qrz, ~?:> iY~~ ~rz,"J rz,~ r-:><<'C 'C Cj e:;v e:;<<'C 2002 TRAFFIC COLLISIONS 600 500 392 400 300 200 100 o I iii Accidents for the Month. Accidents for the Year I Page 7 164 . . PART 1 CRIMES Offense Current month Total for current yr. Same month 2001 Total for 2001 Homicide 0 I, 0 0 1 Rape/Sex Offenses 0 3 1 11 Robbery-All 3 10 0 6 Assault-Felony 0 26 5 31 Assault-4th 21 178 26 270 Burglary-Residential 6 67 . 5 77 Burqlary-Other 4 42 7 53 Theft-Shopliftinq 8 33 9 72 Theft-from Vehicle 10 126 13 168 Theft-from Bldq 11 105 8 119 Theft-Vehicle 2 26 2 20 Theft-Other 10 124 13 141 Arson-All 0 1 0 7 Total 75 796 89 976 . , PART 2 CRIMES Offense Current Month Total for current yr. CUrrent Month/2001 Total for 2001 Resisting/Obstructing 2 23 1 . 17 Stalking/Harassment/Endangerment 3 45 7 70 UI SC/F raud/Embezzle/Property 5 70 12 69 Malicious Mischief-Felony 6 44 6 45 Malicious Mischief-3rd 8 90 9 168 Weapons Violations 1 26 1 20 Crimes. Against Child/Sex Offense 2 29 5 34 Drug Violation 7 79 15 103 Domestic - Verbal 0 26 3 43 DUI 7 68 3 79 Alcohol Violations 5 63 12 65 Violate Protection Order 0 29 6 85 Runaway 6 89 22 115 Miscellaneous/Other 7 80 14 80 Total 59 761 116 993 . Page 8 165 ,--- . ANIMAL CONTROL INCIDENTS For the Current Month Totaling 182 Calls 49 41 )> )> )> )> )> )> )> )> )> :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J ~j" 3' 3' 3' 3' 3' 3' 3' 3' Dl Dl Dl Dl Dl Dl Dl Dl Dl ~ T J;; r: T T ~ T T 0 2. () z < 0 c- (\) 0 0 0 0' ~ c c ..., c Dl 3 iii' Dl o' Ul 0. :J ro '< ~ (\) 0. "C (\) c 0. 0. m Ul US 5' o' lii ;:r<' Parking Ticket Statistics . Tickets 2000 Jan 246 Feb 292 Mar 291 Apr 219 May 167 June 147 July 290 Aug 259 Sept 130 Oct 260 Nov 201 Dec 84 Total 2586 Revenue 2000 $2,225.00 $2,988.00 $4,611.00 $2,530.00 $1,885.00 $1,850.00 $1,525.00 $2,310.00 $1,830.00 $1,820.00 $1,911.00 $1,552.00 $27,037.00 Tickets Revenue 2001 2001 128 $1,094 201 $1,426 310 $2,010 298 $2,850 445 $2,832 223 $2195 358 $2,990 301 $3,390 250 $2,433 351 $3,171 126* $2,265 47* $1,128 2991 $26,656 ,"C' Tickets Revenue 2002 2002 269 $1,070 271 2,247 266 2,697 $25,233 2,517 . * Parking Enforcement Officer on sick leave. Page 9 166