HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 06/10/2008
Utility Advisory Committee
Public Works Conference Room
Port Angeles, W A 98362
June 10, 2008
3:00 P.M.
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Approval Of Minutes For May 13,2008
IV. . Late Items
V. Discussion Items
A. Energy Northwest Membership Presentation
B. Canyon edge Cable Repairs
C. Industrial Wastewater Pretreatment Program Update
D. Leak Detection Program Annual Report
E. Water Use Efficiency Program Annual Report
F. Electronic Waste Discussion (verbal)
VI. Executive Session
VII. Next Meeting Date:
July 8, 2008
VIII. Adjournment
N :\uac\final\061008
UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
0i tD tD~
GUEST SI . N P SHEET
PRINT NAME
,~ '
-..J: lj,{,.,c.. \
~
ORGANIZATION
;U(ft--~S 0-
Co(;~
N: \PWKS \LIGHT\ CONS \ CATE \ SIGNUP. wpd
Utility Advisory Committee
Public Works Conference Room
Port Angeles, W A 98362
May 13, 2008
3:00 P.M.
b~A
-rJ:-r
L Call To Order
Chairman Reed called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
IL Roll Call
Members Present:
Chairman Reed, Betsy Wharton (3:04), Orville Campbell, Dan Di
Guilio, Karen Rogers
Members Absent:
None
Staff Present:
Mark Madsen, Bill Bloor, Glenn Cutler, Mike Puntenney, Steve
Sperr, Larry Dunbar, Tom McCabe, Cate Rinehart
Others Present:
Brian Gawley
IlL Approval of Minutes:
Chairman Reed asked ifthere were any corrections to the minutes April 9, 2008.
Councilmember Rogers moved to approve the minutes. Orville Campbell seconded the motion,
which carried unanimously.
IV.
Late Items
Updates
V. Discussion Items:
A. Washington State Department Of Fish And Wildlife (WDFW) Fish-Rearing
. Channel Lease
Steve Sperr, Deputy Director of Engineering Services, advised that the WDFW lease with the
City to operate a fish-rearing channel along the Elwha River had expired and a new two-year
lease was proposed. There was a brief discussion.
Councilmember Rogers moved to recommend City Council approve and authorize the
Mayor to sign a fish-rearing channel lease with the Washington State Department of Fish
and Wildlife, and authorize the City Manager to make minor modifications to the lease, if
necessary. Councilmember Wharton seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
May 13, 2008
B. Benefit Dump Day
Torn McCabe, Solid Waste Superintendent, reviewed the information in the packet noting the
event included a total of 529 participants delivering 163 tons. There was a brief discussion.
Information only. No action taken.
C. City Vehicle Idling Police
Michael Puntenney, Deputy Director for Operations, explained that in order to protect the public
health by reducing air pollution, save public assets by reducing fuel usage, and eliminate
excessive vehicle engine wear, a new policy limiting idle time of City owned vehicles was being
adopted. A discussion followed.
Information only. No action taken.
D. CFL Markdown Promotion Agreement Amendment
Larry Dunbar, Deputy Director of Power Systems, reported that the City had been offered an
amendment to the "Change a Light, Change the W orId" compact fluorescent lamp markdown
promotion agreement by Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. to extend its term through
September 30, 2008. A discussion followed.
Councilmember Wharton moved to recommend City Council authorize the Public Works
and Utilities Director to sign the amendment and any subsequent amendments to the term
of the CFL Markdown Promotion Agreement. Orville Campbell seconded the motion,
which carried unanimously.
E. Bonneville Power Administration Delegation Agreement Termination
Larry Dunbar, Deputy Director of Power Systems, announced that because the City had been
removed from listing under the North American Electric Reliability Corporation and Western
Electricity Coordinating Council compliance registry the City should terminate the Delegation
Agreement with BP A. There was a brief discussion.
Councilmember Wharton moved to recommend City Council authorize the Director of
Public Works and Utilities to negotiate minor modifications and sign an agreement to
terminate the Delegation Agreement with the Bonneville Power Administration.
Councilmember Rogers seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
May 13, 2008
F. Energy Northwest Membership
Larry Dunbar, Deputy Director of Power Systems, indicated that staff had been approached by
Energy Northwest to determine the City's interest in becoming a member. There are no
membership dues and membership would allow the City to selectively participate in new
generating projects and other services. There was a brief discussion. Staff was directed to invite
a representative from Energy Northwest to a future meeting to give a presentation.
Information only. No action taken.
G. Updates
Larry Dunbar, Deputy Director of Power Systems, advised that letters had been sent to 45
grocery businesses offering free energy audits and staff was waiting to see what the response
would be.
Glenn Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities suggested a future special meeting to take a
field trip to several areas of interest.
VI. Next Meeting Date: June 10, 2008
VII. Adjornment: The meeting was adjourned at 3:54 p.m.
Chairman Reed
Cate Rinehart, Admin Spec II
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
~ORT.ANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
Utility Advisory Committee Memo
June 10, 2008
Utility Advisory Committee
Larry Dunbar, Deputy Director of Power Systems
Energy Northwest Membership Presentation
Summary: Energy Northwest is recruiting publicly owned electric utilities within Washington
State to apply for membership. Energy Northwest representatives will present additional
membership information at today's meeting.
Recommendation: For information only, no action requested.
Background/Analysis: On May 13,2008, staff shared information with the Utility Advisory
Committee about Energy Northwest to gauge the City's interest in becoming a member. The
Utility Advisory Committee directed staff to invite Energy Northwest to a future meeting to
provide additional information about membership.
N:\UAC\DepDir\Energy Northwest Membership Presentation.doc
1. We recommend that you to present the costs and benefits of membership from the
City's perspective,
Costs of Energy Northwest Membership: No monetary costs. We would expect you to appoint
a Board of Director's representative that would come to our quarterly meetings and actively
participate (EN pays for Board travel expenses). The Board of Directors provides feedback to
EN staff and the Executive Board. It has to exclusive authority to start and stop projects. It
elects five Board members to the Executive Board and three "outside" Executive Board
members.
Benefit of Energy Northwest Membership: EN members have first rights to all our new
projects; As a Board member you get an opportunity to shape the future direction of EN.
Quarterly you get to meet with and learn what is happening at EN and at our othertwenty two
member utilities. You get access to all our services at costs.
2. the City's membership obligations,
There is no legal or financial obligation to any EN project. The only obligation would be if you
choose to become a participant in one of our future projects. We would hope as a member
that you would find value and actively participate in quarterly Board of Directors meetings.
3. and a summary of recent Energy Northwest projects including various participation
options and charges.
Pacific Mountain Energy Center - EN attempted to permit a 700 MWe IGCC project in Kalama,
Washington to serve as a base load thermal resource. The development costs were 100%
assumed by EN. We had members considering everywhere from a few MWe to a hundred
MWe. This project was stopped as we were unwilling to meet the permitting requirements of
EFSEC.
Nine Canyon Phase 3 - we just completed an additional 30 MWe of wind at this site bringing it
to 95 MWe. In this case the current participants elected to take all of this additional resource.
Other members would have been next in line.
Reardan Wind - we started over three years ago to permit additional wind resources in
Washington for our members. Without any federal incentives for public power, our costs would
have been about $95/MWe at the bus (no transmission or firming). This could have been
reduced about $15 to $20 per MWe with incentives but none were available. Since we were at
the end of our land leases we sold our development interest.
Radar Ridge Wind - we continue to work with national legislators to fix the CREB public power
renewable incentive program. We have obtained land leases and began our wind and
environmental assessment of this Pacific County wind site. Initial development costs to date
have been paid by EN. At the direction of our Boards, going forward development costs will be
shared by EN and project participants. We held our members only meeting for possible
participation in this project on June 6th. If the CREB program is not revised in the next year,
we would expect to develop this site as a private/PTC project similar to the White Creek Wind
project recently developed.
We will continue to prospect for additional wind sites.
We have investigated both woody and dairy biomass; small hydro applications; are monitoring
the development of PV/solar thermal/geothermal/wave and tidal/pumped storage/simple and
combined cycle gas plants/long term nuclear strategy.
Our O&M services have assisted members with peak manpower assistance, obtaining and
installing small power supplies, operation and maintenance of member's generation assets.
4. You should also point out how Energy Northwest membership could satisfy some or all
of the City's Tier 2 power needs beginning in October of 2011.
Energy Northwest remains committed to its mission to aggregate the power supply needs of its
members and provide cost effective solutions. We will continue to develop renewable projects
for those who need or want them. We will continue to listen to our members and develop cost
effective base load generation projects to meet members Tier 2 needs. This could be
anywhere from a small simple cycle peaking unit needed for wind firming or capacity needs for
a mid to large size CCCT if the aggregated interest is high enough. Tier 2 needs might be
assisted by EN by aggregating the needs of many of our smaller to mid size members and
negotiate a contract purchase with a private developer. EN is monitoring the power supply
management options our members have. If we see that the options are either not available or
don't meet our members needs, we will attempt to aggregate interest and help satisfy these
needs. Bottom line is that Tier 2 needs and options are unclearat this time. EN will listen to
our members and attempt to provide as many options as we can.
5. The City owns and operates a small hydro project (morse creek), you should let us
know what services, if any, you could offer us in support of that project.
EN prides itself in providing quality O&M services. We operate our own projects (CGS, Nine
Canyon, Packwood (hydro), and White Bluffs (solar)). Up until recently we provided
supervision and major maintenance support for the Klickitat Landfill Project HW Hill. We
currently maintain the Mason 3 gas generator. We assisted Asotin PUD in developing a
standby generator for its water supply. We have supported members and non membersin
supplemental manpower for their hydro projects.
6. You should conclude with up to the top 3 reasons why the City should become a
member now.
Reason 1 - you recognize the value of EN as a regional JOA and you want to shape its future. .
Reason 2 - you are facing uncertain future power supply needs and you want to aggregate
your needs with others for more diverse and cost effective solutions to your needs.
Reason 3 - the quarterly meetings and member forums will provide your utility an opportunity
to interact with other public utilities.
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
~ORiA.NGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
Utility Advisory Committee Memo
June 10, 2008
Utility Advisory Committee
Terry Dahlquist, Electrical Engineering Manager
Canyonedge Cable Repairs, Project CL09-2007
Summary: Underground cable in several subdivisions is over 30 years old and has experienced
failures in recent years. Most of the cable is directly buried and replacement would require
trenching through pavement and landscaping. It is proposed to inject the cable at the Canyonedge
Subdivision with a preservative that is guaranteed to prolong its expected life by at least 20 years.
Recommendation: For information only, no action requested. On June 24, 2008, staff will
request City Council approval to award and authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with
Utilx Corporation for Project CL09-2007, in the amount of $25,424.00, including tax.
Background/Analysis: Underground cable installed in the 1970's was projected to have a
30-year life expectancy. Much of the cable in the Canyonedge subdivision, located south of
Ahlvers and east of Peabody Street, is approximately 35 years old, and has experienced a few
failures. Typical of the 1970's, it is directly buried with no conduit. Replacement requires new
trenching through pavement and landscaping. About half of the cable was replaced several years
ago in conjunction with a telephone cable project that required trenching. That replacement cable
was installed in conduit to facilitate future maintenance.
The remaining cable could fail at any time and may cause an extended outage. Two companies in
the United States offer an injection process for rejuvenating existing cables. An insulating fluid is
injected at the cable ends. The fluid fills the cracks, which develop in old insulation. Both
companies warranty the injected cables to last an additional 20 years. Both companies were
contacted for bids. Their bids are based on the unit cost per foot of cable treated, plus the unit cost
of each splice and injection fitting. Based on the estimated quantities required at this location, the
cost of either bid, including sales tax, are nearly identical.
Contractor Bid Amount
Utilx CorporatIon $25,424.00
Novinium Rejuvlnation $26,615.00
N:\UAC\Final\Canyonedge Cable Repairs.doc
Canyonedge Cable Repairs
June 10, 2008
Page 2
Both companies test the cables prior to treatment to verify that the injection process will work. If
they deterrriine the cable is too far deteriorated so they cannot warranty the result, they do not
proceed with injection and the City will need to pay up to $5,000 for their mobilization and testing
effort. If the injection is successful, the City's cost is about half the estimated replacement cost,
and replacement is deferred at least 20 years. Cable cannot be injected a second time, but the
warranty refunds the treatment fee if the cable fails during the wartanty period.
Although this is a new approach for Port Angeles, Clallam County PUD and other utilities in the
area have used the injection process successfully. Novinium Rejuvination is a relatively new
corporation, only in existence for 5 years, and was founded by developers of the Utilx Corporation
system. Uti Ix Corporation has been using their process for 23 years and has a proven ability to
meet their warranty. Because of their proven performance and slightly lower bid, staff will be
recommending to the City Council that they award the contract to Utilx Corporation.
The City has not used this approach before and staff felt that it is important that we introduce it to
the Utility Advisory Committee before bringing a recommendation to the City Council. This
year's Electric Utility budget included $50,000 for cable replacement at the Canyonedge
subdivision.
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
Utility Advisory Committee Memo
June 10, 2008
Utility Advisory Committee
Kathryn Neal, Engineering Manager
Industrial Wastewater Pretreatment Program Update
Summary: The Wastewater Utility is required by the Washington State Department of Ecology
to update its industrial pretreatment program to comply with our Industrial National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System permit, and to comply with Environmental Protection Agency
standards. In addition to revising the Port Angeles municipal code, the updated program will
specifically address the management of septic waste and the accumulation of grease in the sanitary
sewer system.
Recommendation: Forward a favorable recommendation to City Council to approve and
authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with G4 Consulting, Incorporated for technical
services in an amount not to exceed $55,900.
Background/Analysis: The Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) performed an
inspection of the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in 2007 that resulted in several
recommendations and requirements, including the need to update the City's industrial wastewater
pretreatment program. The City's current industrial wastewater pretreatment ordinance (PAMC
13.06) has not been revised since 1983.
The primary tasks under the proposed agreement include the following:
Task 1
Task 2
Task 3
Task 4
Task 5
Calculations to determine the maximum allowable loading to the WWTP which will
be used to determine local limits for industrial dischargers.
Evaluate the potential staffing required to develop and maintain the pretreatment
program tasks and FOG program.
Prepare revisions to the City's industrial wastewater pretreatment ordinance, based on
the Washington State Model Pretreatment Ordinance.
Prepare an update to the City's pretreatment program including procedures and
required forms. The updated program will include guidance for minimizing grease
accumulation in the sanitary sewer system, and for the management of septic waste
that is being hauled directly to the WWTP.
Develop a fats, oils, and grease (FOG) program.
N:\UAC\Final\lndustrial Wastewater Pretreatment Program Update. doc
Industrial Wastewater Pretreatment Program Update
June 10, 2008
Page 2
The City has a major collection system problem with FOG, which creates blockages that may cause
property damage, clean water act violations, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit violations, and public health and safety concerns for the community. As part of the
scope of work, the consultant will work with staff and wastewater customers to draft an updated
program, with options, for future consideration by the Utility Advisory Committee and the City
Council. The level of effort related to this task is focused on meeting with the City and related
businesses to develop an approach for future implementation.
The updated program will include a manual of procedures for staff to follow in maintaining
compliance with all federal and state requirements, and implementing the City ordinance. It will
also include the appropriate forms to be used during program implementation, if the City chooses to
pursue that option. The program will also include an update to the enforcement response plan (ERP)
that will be acceptable to the city as well as the DOE. A functional ERP is critical to the successful
implementation of the pretreatment program as well as the management of FOG in the collection
system.
At this time the City is only partially authorized by the state of Washington to manage its own
industrial pretreatment program. The analysis included in this scope of work will be used in part to
assist in a later City Council decision on whether to become fully authorized. The city reimburses
Washington state approximately $10,000 per year for managing the significant industrial users
(Sills) within the city. The City is responsible to manage the permitting and enforcement for minor
industrial users (MIUs). The scope of work is summarized in the table below, which includes the
budget for all tasks under the agreement including travel expenses.
Estimated
Task Hours Cost
, , 71 $11,000
Task 1 Local Limits
Task 2 Staffing Summary 36 6,000
Task 3 Sewer Use Ordinance 40 7,000
Task 4 Procedures Manuals 120 20,000
Task 5 FOG Program 80 12,000
Total Costs 397 $56,000
Adequate funding for this effort is available from current Wastewater Utility operating and capital
improvement program budgets. G4 Consulting, Incorporated from ForestGrove, Oregon is the
recommended technical consultant because of their track record updating similar programs in the
northwest, and excellent recommendations received. The principal ,of G4 Consulting, Mr. John
Greeley, is well respe<:;ted within the specialized area of industrial pretreatment. His statement of
qualifications, summary of projects, and references are available on request, or from the City's
website.
It is recommended that the Utility Advisory Cominittee forward a favorable recommendation to City
Council to approve and authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with G4 Consulting, Incorporated'
for technical services in an amount no no exceed $55,900.
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
~ORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
Utility Advisory Committee Memo
June 10, 2008
Utility Advisory Committee
Ernie Klimek, W aterlW astewater Collection Superintendent
Leak Detection Program Annual Report
Summary: The City has utilized leak detection companies for the past eighteen years to
detect water leaks in the distribution system. Detecting and repairing leaks results in the utility
becoming more efficient in the areas of water conservation and is part of the City's Water Use
Efficiency Program goals. This year's leak detection survey was performed from March 1 ih
through March 21 st. The estimated combined water loss that was detected was found to be 3,600
gallons per day.
Recommendation:
For informational only, no action requested.
Background/Analysis: Each year the WaterlWastewater Collection Division contracts
with a leak detection company to perform a survey of one- fifth of the water distribution system.
The Utilities Services Group ofHD Supply Waterworks conducted the survey this year.
Extremely sensitive sound amplification instruments and computer-based correlations are used
for pinpointing leak locations.
The main area covered this year was from Cedar to Lincoln Streets (West - East) and 2nd Street
to Lauridsen Boulevard (North - South). Also included was the area from Lincoln to Chambers
(West - East) and 6th to Lauridsen (North - South). This year a total of approximately 33 miles
of piping was surveyed including all intersecting lines. Approximately 40 hours were spent on
this project by the leak detection company and a total of 5 leaks were found within our
distribution system. The water loss due to leakage was estimated to be approximately 3,600
gallons per day (GPD), which would equal!.3 million gallons per year. Three of the leaks have
already been repaired, with two remaining leaks to be repaired.
In addition, the Water/Wastewater Collections Division took this opportunity to do test
demonstrations on some new leak detection equipment that it can use in-house to further expand
the leak detection program. The tests produced comparative results from those found from the
leak detection services company.
Attachment: Summary of Survey and Pinpointing Report
N:\UAC\Final\Leak Detection Program Annual Report.doc
Summary of Survey and Pinpointing Report
Client: City of Port Angeles, W A
Date: 03/21/2008
Period Covered: March 17,2008 to March 21,2008
General Area Covered: South
TOTAL ANNUAL WATER LOSS
(formula: leak.GI'M ~ min1llOur ~ h(lllr$-'day.'( d:!.~'.\il:carl
1,314,000.0 GALLONS
SURVEY DATA
Distance Surveyed: 175095.000 feet, 33.160 miles
Time Spent Surveying: 26.08 hours
Points Surveyed Access Points Requiring further investigation
Hydrants 59 (poinl$ thai ~rc returned 10 for pinpointing or clirninJliOlll
Valves 462 Leak sounds on: Valves 3
Services 355 H ydran ts I
Other 5 Services 3
Total 881 Other ()
Total 7
PINPOINTING DATA
LEAK TYPE NUMBEIl TIME SPENT roTAL TOTAL. LARGEST, LARGEST. SMALLEST. SMALLEST. AVERAGE
or LEAKS PINPOINT. GAI.LONS GALLONS PEIl GALLONS GAI.LONS PEIl GALLONS GALLONS PEIl LEAK SIZE
ING (hours) PER MIN DAY PEIl MIN DAY PEIl MIN DAY GPM
MAIN LINE
VALVE 2 1.75 1.2 1800.0 1.0 1440.0 0.25 360.00 0.63
HYDRANT I 0.33 0.2 360.0 0.2 360.0 0.25 360.00 0.25
METEIl
CURB STOP
SERVICE LINE
SERVICE CONN I 1.00 1.0 1440.0 1.0 1440.0 1.00 1440.00 1.00
OTHER
UNDEFINED I 1.58
TOT ALS 5 4.67 2.50 3600 n.a. n.a n.a n.a 0.500
Sites Investigated for Pinpointing
Other Time Spent on p'rojeet (includes pinpointing false leak sounds)
7
9.25 hrs.
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
Utility Advisory Committee Memo
Date:
June 10, 2008
To:
Utility Advisory Committee
From:
Ernie Klimek, W ater/W astewater Collection Superintendent
Subject:
Water Use Efficiency Program Annual Report
Summary: The City is required to annually report our progress toward reaching Water Use
Efficiency program goals to our customers and the Washington State Department of Health. The
report was provided to the Department of Health and the information was shared with our
customers in our 2nd quarter compliance mailing.
Recommendation: For information only, no action requested.
Background/Analysis: In accordance with the Water Use Efficiency (WUE) program an
annual report was submitted to the Washington State Department of Health. The 2nd quarter
compliance mailing to our customers included our current activities under the WUE program as
follows:
LEAKAGE INFORMA nON
The annual distribution system leakage calculation for the 12-month reporting period from January
2007 through December 2007 is provided below.
Total production from the Elwha source in millions of gallons:
1,141
Total authorized consumption in millions of gallons:
900
Unaccounted for distribution system water in millions of gallons:
242
Distribution system losses as a percentage:
21%
N:\UAC\Final\Water Use Efficiency Program Annual Report.doc
Water Use Efficiency Program Annual Report
June 10, 2008
Page 2
GOAL SETTING INFORMA nON
After public input, the following WUE program goals were set by City Council on December 12,
2007. The goals are:
SUPPL V-SIDE GOAL: The Water Utility will implement a program intended to achieve a
one percent reduction in distribution system leakage per year and improve the accuracy and
accountability of the system through meter replacement and calibration.
DEMAND-SIDE GOAL: The Water Utility will implement a program intended to achieve a
two-tenths of one percent reduction in customer consumption per capita per year including
offering a minimum of six water use efficiency measures to all customers.
Since this is the first annual report, which establishes the future baseline, there are no measured
results toward reaching the above goals. However, the Public Works and Utilities Department
reported that it is performing leak detection, repairing leaks, and doing meter change outs at this
time. . We have also offered water conservation kits with currently over 2,000 customer
participants.