HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 09/14/2010Utility Advisory Committee
Jack Pittis Conference Room
Port Angeles, WA 98362
September 14, 2010
AGENDA
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Approval Of Minutes For August 10, 2010
IV. Late Items
V. Discussion Items:
A. Shared Resource Conservation Manager Program Update (verbal report
only)
B. Combined Sewer Overflow Loan Application for FY2012
C. Department of Ecology Stormwater Capacity Grant Acceptance
D. 2010 Utility Rate Studies Presentation
VI. Information Only Items:
A. City Hall Energy Conservation Project Update (verbal report only)
B. Advanced Metering Infrastructure System Project Update
C. Broadband Technology Opportunities Program Grant Update (verbal
report only)
VII. Next Meeting Date October 12, 2010
VIII. Adjournment
N: \uac \final \091410
UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
PRINT NAME
4 k
1r'rA 'nos ,t/
I On rct
r tI tipe
G szo a
N: PWKS LIGHT CONS CATE SIGNUP.wpd
GUEST SIGN UP SHEET
ORGANIZATION
C fei J A Con u4ee
/72)
3 DA/
C/41(4* Ce DCO
I. Call To Order
Chairman Di Guilio called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Councilmembers Present: Chairman Di Guilio, Cherie Kidd, Brooke Nelson, Pat
Downie
Councilmembers Absent: Max Mania, Brad Collins, Don Perry
Utility Advisory
Committee Members
Present:
Staff Present:
City Council Special Meeting/Utility Advisory Committee
Jack Pittis Conference Room
Port Angeles, WA 98362
August 10, 2010
3:00 p.m.
Paul Elliott, Dean Reed
Others Present: Shirley Nixon Citizen
III. Approval Of Minutes
Kent Myers, Bill Bloor, Larry Dunbar, Steve Sperr, Phil
Lusk, Terri Partch, Rick Hostetler, Yvonne Ziomkowski,
Cate Rinehart
Chairman Di Guilio asked if there were any corrections to the minutes of July 13, 2010.
Dean Reed moved to approve the minutes. Councilmember Nelson seconded the motion,
which carried unanimously.
IV. Late Items
Bonneville Power Administration Cooperative Agreement No. 48475 Amendment #1
V. Discussion Items
A. Stormwater Retrofit And Low Impact Development Grant
Application
Terri Partch, Stormwater Engineer, noted that the Department of Ecology has
approximately $23.5 million available which they are offering through a competitive
grant program to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination system Phase I and Phase II
jurisdictions. There was a brief discussion.
Councilmember Nelson moved to recommend City council authorize the city
Manager to sign and submit a grant application to the Department of Ecology
under the Stormwater Retrofit and Low Impact Development competitive Grants
Program in an amount up to $1,000,000 for the 4 Street Stormwater Improvement
Project. Councilmember Kidd seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
B. Consultant Selection For Communications Plan Services
Phil Lusk, Power Resources Manager, explained that the City advertised and negotiated a
proposal for consulting services for a communications plan in support of the Advanced
Metering Infrastructure System and Demand Response projects. There was a lengthy
discussion.
Paul Elliott moved to recommend City Council authorize the City Manager to sign
an agreement with ParkerLePla in an amount not to exceed $34,917 for Phase 1 and
2 and make minor modifications to the agreement, if necessary. Councilmember
Nelson seconded the motion, which passed on a vote of three with Dean Reed and
Mayor Di Guilio in opposition.
C. Retail Tiered Rate Methodology Study
Phil Lusk, Power Resources Manager, distributed a handout and reviewed the contents
noting the retail tiered rate options. There was a brief discussion.
Dean Reed moved to recommend City Council approve the Retail Tiered Rate
Methodology Study findings and recommendations. Paul Elliott seconded the
motion, which carried unanimously.
D. Electric Utility 2010 Resource Plan
Phil Lusk, Power Resources Manager, distributed a handout, reviewed the contents, and
explained that the City must comply with a Washington State mandate to update its
resource Plan. There was a brief discussion.
Councilmember Nelson moved to recommend City Council approve the electric
Utility 2010 Resource Plan. Dean Reed seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
E. Energy Conservation Program Increase
Larry Dunbar, Deputy Director of Power Systems, emphasized that there was going to be
a number of increased activities under the energy conservation program starting in 2011
and requested increasing one full time staff member. There was a lengthy discussion.
The item was tabled until the meeting in November 2010.
F. Bonneville Power Administration Cooperative Agreement No.
48475 Amendment #1
Phil Lusk, Power Resources Manager, pointed out that BPA had become aware of a
technology integrating wind energy to provide thermal energy storage. There was a brief
discussion.
Dean Reed moved to recommend City Council authorize the City Manager to sign
Amendment #1 to Cooperative Agreement No. 48475 with the Bonneville Power
Administration for the additional thermal storage devices. Paul Elliott seconded the
motion, which carried unanimously.
VI. Information Only Items:
A. Sewer Extension To Rayonier Mount Pleasant Landfill
Information only. No discussion or action taken.
B. Advanced Metering Infrastructure System Project Update
Information only. No discussion or action taken.
VII. Next Meeting Date: September 14, 2010
VIII. Adjournment: 4:05 p.m.
Dan Di Guilio, Mayor Janessa Hurd, City Clerk
Dan Di Guilio, Chair Cate Rinehart, Administrative Specialist II
Utility Advisory Committee
N \PWKS\LIGHT\CONS \CATE\AUTI OMEET
CITY OF
if
W A S H I N G T O N U.S.A.
Utility Advisory Committee Memo
September 14, 2010
Date:
To: Utility Advisory Committee
From: Kathryn Neal, P.E., Engineering Manager
Subject: Combined Sewer Overflow Loan Application for FY2012
Summary: The City has committed to completing the Phase 1 Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO)
Projects by the end of 2013. While the City has several Public Works Trust Fund loans associated
with these projects, to fully fund all the work an additional loan is needed. The Department of
Ecology's funding cycle for fiscal year 2012 includes a deadline for submission of applications by
November 5, 2010.
Recommendation: Forward a favorable recommendation to City Council to authorize the
Mayor to sign the Fiscal Year 2012 Funding Cycle Application certification, in an amount
not to exceed $10,000,000. In addition, if a grant or loan is approved, authorize the Mayor to
execute the agreement.
Background/Analysis: The City is pursuing a Department of Ecology (DOE) State
Revolving Fund (SRF) loan to assist in fully funding $19M in Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO)
Phase 1 Projects. The deadline for submission of applications for Washington State fiscal year
2012 (which begins June 1, 2011) is November 5, 2010.
Construction cost estimates based on the 60% plans were submitted to the City in July 2010. On
September 9, 2010, the 90% complete construction plans and specifications were submitted to the
City. An updated construction cost estimate based on the 90% plans will be available within a
month, and will be used for the final loan application.
Table 1 on the following page includes a breakdown of the Phase I CSO project costs. The costs
shown are based on the current estimate, and the 10% contingency is an allowance in order to
adjust the loan request if needed when the construction bids are opened in 2011. the
If the funding package resulting from the
approved loan exceeds the bid price for the CSO Phase 1 project, DOE will adjust the loan amount
downward at that time. It is the DOE's preference that loan requests are conservative (worst case
costs) to avoid a funding shortfall after a project has been approved. Although staff estimates a
need for a $8,540,000 SRF loan, there is a possibility that the bid amount could increase the
amount to be financed up to $10,000,000.
•,0
N \PROJECTS \06 -0I CSO Projects Phase 1\30 Council UAC\2010 -09 -14 CSO Project Loan Application FY2012 REV.docm
Combined Sewer Overflow Loan Application for FY 2012
September 14, 2010
Page 2 of 2
Project
Francis Street Sewer Main
Storage Tank Modifications
Force Mains from Pump Station 4 $425,000 $2,955,000
Front Street Sewer Main
WWTP and Outfall Modifications
Subtotals: $425,000 $2,955,000
Total design and construction contract:
Construction support (management, engineering, inspection, testing,
archaeology, etc.)
Property Purchase Cost
Current Cost Estimate (60% design)
Contingency for loan request (approx. 10% of construction estimate)
Total Project Cost
Table 2 outlines the proposed funding sources for the Phase 1 CSO Projects. The City has
obtained four Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) loans. The City still needs a $8,540,000 loan to
fully fund the projects. The DOE's State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan program is anticipated to be
used as the local match for two of the PWTF construction loans. The PWTF loans are for 20
years at a 0.5% interest rate, and the SRF loan will be for 20 years at a 2.6% interest rate.
A. Loans Obtained
PWTF Pre Construction Loan
2 II6 PWTF Pre Construction Loan
PWTF Construction Loan
PWTF Construction Loan
Total Funding
(including contingency)
Table 1 Summary of Phase 1 CSO Project Costs
Detailed Design
Cost
Subtotals:
Pre design Cost
Table 2 Summary of Phase I CSO
Source Loan Amount
$590,000
$885,000
$1,875,000
$10,000,000
$13,350,000
B. Additional Loan Funding Needed ($22,160,000 A
C. Loan funding request for PWTF Match*
D. DOE FY2012 SRF Loan Request 1 1
E. Contingency 1
F. Maximum SRF Loan Request 1 1
Project Funding
Local Match*
$110,000
$160,000
$340,000*
$1,800,000*
Estimated
Construction Cost
$2,970,000
2,820,000
5,160,000
2,570,000
1,760,000
$15,280,000
18,660,000
+2,500,000
1,000,000
22,160,000
1,460,000
$23,660,000
Total
$700,000
$1,045,000
$2,215,000
$11,800,000
$15,760,000
$6,400,000
$2,140,000
$8,540,000
$1,460,000
$10,000,000
Loans Local Matches $25,760,000
Loans I $23,350,000
Local Match from Reserves I $270,000 I
Staff intends to use $2,140,000 of the proposed $5,660,000 DOE SRF loan as the local match
needed for the 2 PWTF construction loans ($340,000 $1,800,000 $2,140,000).
1
W A S H I N G T O N U.S.A.
Utility Advisory Committee Memo
Date: September 14, 2010
To: Utility Advisory Committee
From: Terri Partch, P.E., Stormwater Engineer
Subject: Department of Ecology Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant Acceptance
Summary: The Department of Ecology has approximately $23.5 million available which they are
offering through a non competitive grant program to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Phase I and Phase II jurisdictions. The Department of Ecology has offered the City $121,229.00
through this pass through grant.
Recommendation: Forward a favorable recommendation to City Council to authorize the City
Manager to sign the grant agreement with the Department of Ecology under the Municipal
Stormwater Capacity Grant Program in the amount of $121,229.00.
Background /Analysis: The 2010 Washington State Legislature appropriated $23.5 million to the
Department of Ecology (DOE) for a Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant Program. The program
provides funds for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase I and II
municipal stormwater permittees to address stormwater management and control.
City staff have proposed, in the draft 2011 Budget, to use the funds to either (1) complete a Needs
Assessment Study of the City's Stormwater System, and/or (2) fund part of the cost to purchase a
Vactor truck. The final decision on which alternative will be funded by this grant will not be made
until the 2011 Budget is finalized. The grant agreement must be in place by October 1, 2010.
It is recommended that the Utility Advisory Committee forward a favorable recommendation to
the City Council to authorize the City Manager to sign the grant agreement with the DOE under
the Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant Program in the amount of $121,229.00.
N: \UAC\Final\DOE Stormwater Capacity Grant Acceptance.doc
PORTANGELES
W A S H I N G T O N U.S.A.
Utility Advisory Committee Memo
Date: September 14, 2010
To: Utility Advisory Committee
From: Larry Dunbar, Deputy Director of Power Systems
Subject: 2010 Utility Rate Studies Presentation
Summary: In 2008, FCS Group completed comprehensive rate studies for the Electric, Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste Collection and Transfer Station utilities. A presentation will be made at
today's meeting on the recommended retail rate and fee adjustments for 2011.
Recommendation: Forward a favorable recommendation to City Council to proceed with a
public hearing on utility rate and fee adjustments for the Electric, Water, Wastewater, Solid
Waste Collection, Transfer Station, and Stormwater Utilities.
Background /Analysis: In 2008, FCS Group completed comprehensive rate studies for the
Electric, Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste Collections, and Solid Waste Transfer Station utilities.
For the last two years staff has updated the studies and has not used a consultant. Staff will present
its findings and recommendations on this year's rate studies at today's meeting.
Following a presentation, staff will seek the recommendation of the Utility Advisory Committee to
City Council to proceed with a public hearing on the utility rate and fee adjustments for the
Electric, Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste Collection, Transfer Station, and Stormwater Utilities.
The proposed City Council public hearing is October 5, 2010 for a presentation of the rate studies
and to allow public input to the process after the presentation. The public hearing would be
continued to October 19, 2010 at which time the public hearing will be closed.
Staff will return to the Utility Advisory Committee on October 12, 2010 requesting a
recommendation to City Council to adopt rate and fee ordinance amendments. The proposed rate
and fee adjustments for each utility would be effective on Monday, January 3, 2011.
N: \UAC\Final \Utility Retail Rate and Fee Adjustments doc
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
September 14, 2009
Utility Advisory Committee
Utility Rate Study Presentation
Larry Dunbar, Deputy Director of Power Systems
Port Angeles Utility Customer Cost?
$4,000
a q:.`° g3 6
n ‘b A A
N• 6 9 N s
N 61 e s
Co tx
.3 6 9 1
6 9 1
6 9 9
0 0 0 0 0 <i) 0 1\ 0 O 1 t\ N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1
Proposed Agenda
1. Historical Utility Rates Costs
2. 2011 Proposed Utility Rate Adjustments
3. 2011 Proposed Utility Fee Adjustments
4. Electric, Water, Wastewater, Collection,
Transfer Station, and Stormwater Utility Rate
Studies
5. Summary What's Next?
Based on September 10, 2010 Proposed Budget
2
Historical Rate Adjustments
Utility 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Electric Base 9
Electric Consumption 5 9% 9
Water Base 3 0% 19 0% 19.0% 7 0% 8 5%
Water Consumption 3 0% 19 0% 19 0% 7 0% 8 5% 2
Wastewater 4 3% 4.8% 5 3% 2 1% 4 0%
Wastewater CSO 108 0% 54.0% 37 0% 29 0% 30 1% 9
Collections Weekly Pickup 24 8% -1.8% 1.5% 9
Collections EOW Pickup -10 9% 1 5%
Stormwater 100 0% 9
Transfer Station 5.0% 14.5% 7 5% 10 5% 4 5%
Blue Mountain 7.5% 3.5%
3
2
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
Residential Customer Utility Costs
5995
S387
$71
:.ye •3262 I, $36
$42
S900
5278
5904
5282
Mal KUNO& 5228 11 $36
$22
5 5216 $36
PA•42•1 5217,
5277 $72
$91
srr 5296 0111 $36
Annual compound
cost increase of 5 0%
per year from 2000 to
2009, or 2 5% above
consumer once
index
Annual compound
population growth
0 5% per year from
2000 to 2009
I
$L55G 5214 1
l I
1!LI.5306b1 $212 1
621 i
I
$500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500
Average Annual Cost (based on actual charges, customers, and consumption)
Electnc Water t7 Wastewater O Garbage O Combined Sewer Overflow Stormwater
2011 Proposed Rate Adjustments
Residential Customers
2011 Proposed
Utility 2010 Residential Rates Monthly Increase
Electric Base $11.00 /month $2.00
Electric Consumption 0 0582 /kWh $0 00
Stormwater 6 00 /month $0 00
Collections Weekly Pickup 27 20 /month $0 00
Collections EOW Pickup 19 75 /month $0 00
Water Base 26 75 /month $0 00
Water Consumption 2 08/100 CF $0 00
Wastewater 44.30 /month $0 00
Wastewater CSO 430 CF 14.95 /month $2.65
Average Customer Total $212 00 /month $4 65
1,300 kWh 655 CF Without CSO $2.00
4
5
3
Residential Customer Utility Cost?
$4,000
$3,000
$2 ,000 4 ,,6ry 4- c.^ s y
$1,000
0'
ash
a
41,0 agti•4ti,
69
�N
,i9 ti° ti° (l° 'L° ti ti rP ti ti 6
2011 Proposed Rate Adjustments
Transfer Station Utility
2010 Rates 2011 Proposed
Transfer Station (per ton) Increase (per ton)
Collection Entities Tons $98.20 $4.57
Self Haulers Base $10 00 $0 00
Self Haulers Tons $120.10 $5.75
Yard Waste Collection Entities Tons $27 70 $0 00
Yard Waste Self Haulers Base $5.00 $0 00
Yard Waste Self Haulers Tons $44 95 $0 00
Biosolids Collection Entities Tons $48.40 $2.25
Blue Mountain Self Haulers Base $5 00 $0 00
Blue Mountain Self Haulers Tons $204 65 $0.00
7
4
2011 Proposed Rate Adjustments
Transfer Station Utility
Transfer Station
Compost 1 -3 Yards
Compost 4 -49 Yards
Compost 50 -99 Yards
Compost 100 -299 Yards
Compost 300 Yards or More
Compost 4 Yards or More (Schools, Non
Profit, or Governmental Agencies)
2011 Proposed
Utility Fee Adjustments
Electric Utility
Electrical Work Permits
Pole Attachments
Water Utility Residential
Connection 5/8 Inch $1,160
Connection 3/4 Inch $1,160
Connection 1 Inch $1,260
2010 Rates
(per yard)
$20 00
$17.00
$16.00
$15 00
$14 00
$15 00
2011 Proposed
2010 Fees Fee lncrease
$119.90 $29.98
$13 80 $1 20
2011 Proposed
Increase (per ton)
$0.00
$0 00
$0 00
$0.00
$0 00
$0.00
$120 00
$120 00
$130 00
Water Utility Commercial
Connection 1 Inch $1,710 $0 00
Connection 1 -1/2 Inch $3,200 $365.00
Connection 2 Inch $3,200 $365.00
8
9
5
Electrical Work Permit Fee Survey
Port Angeles
1 I 1 $119 90
Port AngelesProposed 1 $149 90
Buren
Olympia
Lynnwood
Mountlake Terrace j
Tukwila
Aberdeen
Renton
i
Redmond
Kirkland i
Seattle 4
Bellevue
Department of Labor and Industries
Bellingham p $100 00
1 $45 00
$80 00
$75 00
$81 90
$10070
$79 40
9126
1 $13200
1 $140 87
1 $13850
1 $18450
$12600
$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300
Monthly Charge
Electrical Work Permit Fee Survey
10
Port Angeles 1 1 $175 30
Port AngelesProposed $257 30
IP Bellingham 1 $214 00
E Buren 1 11200
y 2 Olympia 1 $12500
i
4
Lynnwood 1 $198 00
in w Mount lake Terrace i 1 $38300
y LL
41 y Tukwila 21 2 70 im
CC g Aberdeen 4 $164 10
O t S Renton 1 $125
Al O Redmond
O 4 $186 70
Al Kirkland 1 $225 50
Seattle i $35000
Bellevue 4 1 $20100
Department of Labor and Industres 1 1 $142 00
$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500
Monthly Charge
11
6
Pole Attachment Fee Survey
Port Angeles 1 I $11 50
Port Angeles Proposed $13 80
Mason County PUD #3 I I $14 00
Mason County PUD #1 I I I $15 41
Clallam County PUD #1 I I $17 15
Grays Harbor PUD I I $13 38
Ellensburg I I $12 68
1
Tacoma Public Utilities I I $16 98
1
Snohomish County PUD I $11 74
Seattle City Light I I $18 55
$0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25
Monthly Charge 12
Electric Utility Rate Study
City Budget Breakdown
Electric 34.4%
13
7
Electric Utility Expenses
Purchased Power Industnal
Transmission 38 6%
a Purchased Power Distnbu9on
System 28 5%
State /City Taxes 9 2%
Personnel 8 2%
Non -Operating 0 6%
0 Administrative /Accounting 3 8%
te Charges Seances 2 6%
0 Supplies 2 2%
Debt Service 2 1%
Conservation 2 5%
❑Cash toCFP00%
a R Charges 1 0%
Administrative Charges 0 8%
14
Electric Rate Study Assumptions
2010 Revenues If $993K
2010 O &M $956K
Retail rate deficiency 5.3%
2011 retail rate adjustment proposed 2.3%
7% BPA Wholesale increase Oct 2009 (no step)
-12% BPA Wholesale Increase Oct 2011
Discontinuation of "Lookback Credit" Oct 2011
-10% BPA Transmission Increase Oct 2011
Industrial Transmission Pass Through
15
8
Weather Effects Energy Sales Revenue
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
J F
Residential -8% Commercial -5%
M A
1•••••••2009 -20101
M
Electric Rate Study Assumptions
•Electric work permit 3 of 3rd year
cost recovery proposed
•Pole attachments 2nd of 4 year
extended cost recovery proposed
No Tight operation facility contribution
•Additional debt service
•No customer growth
Rate stabilization adequate
J 16
17
9
Electric Rate Study Assumptions
•No COLA included
•PERS medical increases
•Tier 2 expanded conservation program
•BPA C &I DR grant not included
Electric Utility Challenges
•BPA energy conservation program
increase
•Advanced metering infrastructure,
demand response, communications
projects, retail rates using new design
•Future 9/30/2011 Tier 2 decision, BPA
wholesale Tiered Rates, new policy for
large single loads
•Climate change renewables legislation
•Residential exchange program litigation
•2011 economic development State law
sunset
18
19
10
Electric Rate Study Findings
Capital Facilities Plan ($1,000)
Capital Facilities Plan I 2010 2011
Design for F Street 1202 Upgrade 30
Advanced Metering Infrastructure 107 46
BPA Demand Response Program 20 127
Eclipse Add Second Source 35
Transmission Line Upgrade WA to I St 220
Upgrade A St Substation Transformer 60
Laurel Substation Structure
Washington Sub Transmission Line Renovati' 200
F Street 1202 Upgrade 140
Morse Creek Hydro Improvements 75
College Substation 80
System Protection 60
Laurel Street Substation 80
Advanced. Metering Infrastructure 1,000 1,777
BPA Demand Response Program 444
MAN Services Agreement 13 133
Street Light Upgrades 1,200
Pole Replacement 900
Cable Restoration Phase III 100
Total I 2,249 4,599
20
Electric Rate Study Findings
Capital Facilities Plan Funding Sources ($1,000)
ICapital Facilities Plan Funding Sources I 2010 I 2011
CFP Beginning Cash 297 4,521
Other Note Proceeds 4,879
Department of Energy 417
Cash /Rate Financed Contribution 994
Transfers Related to CFP 184 77
Elwha Mitigation
ICFP Ending Cash I 4,521 I
21
11
Electric Rate Study Findings
With 2.3% Rate Increase
Revenue Requirements ($1,000)
'Description 1 2010 1 2011
Distribution System Sales 16,238 16,552
Industrial Transmission Sales 12,509 13,301
Permit Construction Related 294 319
Miscellaneous 252 221
Pole Rental 71 71
'Total Revenues 1 29,364 1 30,464
Operation Maintenance 6,875 5,962
Purchased Generation Transmission 20,001 20,860
Taxes 2,737 2,849
Transfer Payments 184 174
Debt Service 453 665
Materials Job Cost 520 520
'Total Expenses 30,770 31,030
'Revenues Less Expenses
(1,406); (567),
Electric Unrestricted Cash Balance
$9,000
$8,000
$7,000
$6,000
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Electnc Utility —EES Consulting
22
23
12
Electric Rate Study Findings
With 2.3% Rate Increase
Ending Fund Balances ($1,000)
Type of Reserve
Ending Unrestricted Balance
Ending Rate Stabilization Balance Tier 2
Ending CFP Balance
Ending Contingencies Replacement Balance
Ending Bond Reserves
Ending Light Operations Center Balance
Ending Conservation Balance
Total Reserves
Port Angeles
Port AngelesProposed
Mason County PUD #3
Mason County PUD# 1
Clallam County PUD# 1
Puget Sound Energy
GraysHarbor PUD
Snohomish County PUD
Tacoma Public Utilities
SeattleCity Light
Washingt on St at e Average 1
$0 $20
2010 1 2011 1
3,415 I 2,848
900 900
4,315 3,748
4,521
30 30
509 509
650 650
639 800
10,664 1 5,738 1
$87 30
1 $87 30
$92 10
I $95 85
t $93 00
Requirement
2,600 I
900
3,500 EES Consulting
160 Annual Bond Covenant
509 Bond Covenant
2,000 Replacement Cost
6,170 1
Electric Rate Survey Energy Rate
I $104 70
$12300
I $93 09
$109 23
$12225
$40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160
24
515721
Monthly Charge 25
13
Electric Rate Survey Base Charge
Port Angeles i $11 00
Port AngelesProposed $13 00
Mason CountyPUD #3 i $1500
MasonCountyPUD #1 1 $1660
i
ClallamCounty PUD# 1 1 1 $15 00
Puget Sound Energy $7 26
GraysHarborPUD 1 $1100
SnohomishCountyPUD 1 t $1350
Tacoma Public Utilities 1 $550
Seattle City Light 1 1 $3 50
i
NWPPA Survey Average 1 $1388
$0 $5 $10 $15 $20
Monthly Charge 26
Water Utility Rate Study
City Budget Breakdown
Water 7.7%
27
14
Water Utility Expenses
fa Personnel 19 7%
Debt Service 17 2%
0 State /City Taxes 13 8%
0 Administrative /Accounting 12 0%
Charges Services 12 0%
CI Supplies 5 7%
la Administrative Charges 6 5%
O Cash toCFP35%
Utilities Expense 4 0%
fT Charges 2 7%
0 Non -Operating 2 9%
Water Rate Study Assumptions
•2009 revenues •$123K
•2009 O &M •$104K
•Retail rate sufficient
•2011 retail rate adjustment proposed 0.0%
•No customer growth in 2010
28
29
15
Water Rate Study Assumptions
Connection fees 3rd of 4th year extended
cost recovery program
Flat rate 3rd of 3rd year cost recovery
program not needed due to reduced usage
No COLA
PERS and medical increase
Additional debt service
Water Utility Challenges
Water Use Efficiency distribution system
leakage standard
Operation of new PAWTP
Advanced metering infrastructure,
communications projects
30
31
16
Water Rate Study Findings
Capital Facilities Plan ($1,000)
Capital Facilities Plan 1 2010 1 2011
Directed Services 55
McDougal Subzone Improvements WT04- 2007 40
Design for Morse Creek Waterline WT03 -2009 100
Design for Phase II III Transmission Line WTO 575
E St Reservoir Painting 200
Bi- Annual Replacements WT02 -2006 340
Dry Creek Water Line Settlement 60
Advanced Metenng Infrastructure WT01 -2008 500 613
Concrete Cychnder Pipe Replacement 1,430
McDougal Subzone Improvements WT04 -2007 500
Transfer Morse Creek Waterlines to PUD 400
Total 1 1,670 1 3,143
32
Water Rate Study Findings
Capital Facilities Plan Funding Sources ($1,000)
Capital Facilities Plan Funding Sources 1 2009 1 2010
CFP Beginning Cash 217 2,043
Other Note Proceeds 3,259 900
PWTF Loan Proceeds
Elwha Mitigation
Treatment Plant O &M 35
Cash /Rate Financed Contribution 200 200
CFP Ending Cash 1 2,043 1 1
33
17
Water Rate Study Findings
With 0.0% Rate Increase
Revenue Requirements ($1,000)
IDescription 1 2010 2011 1
Irrigation Sales 129 132
Residential Sales 3,236 3,300
Commercial Sales 1,431 1,459
PUD Wholesale Sales 263 263
Elwha Industrial Sales 16 16
Other Fees 178 178
Investment Interest 47 62
Miscellaneous Revenues 417 405
!Total Revenues 1 5,5881 5,6821
O &M 1,938 2,084
Administration General 1,159 1,201
Utilities 227 227
Chemicals 75 76
Taxes 765 779
Transfer Payments 279 306
Debt Service 865 972
Total Expenses 1 5,308 5,645
Revenues Less Expenses
$4,000
$3,500
$3,000
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
—Water Utility —60 Days O &M
280 37
Water Unrestricted Cash Balance
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
34
35
18
Water Rate Study Findings
With 0.0% Rate Increase
Ending Fund Balances ($1,000)
!Type of Reserve 1 2010 1 2011 1 Requirement 1
Ending Unrestricted Cash Balance 2,720 2,757 1,000 60 Days O &M
Ending Rate Stabilization Balance
Ending PAWTP O &M Designated Reserves 5,538 5,373 5,373 5,373
Ending PAWTP O &M Restricted Reserves 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100
Ending Bond Reserves 590 590 590 Bond Covenant
Ending CFP Balance 2,043
'Total Ending Reserves 1 11,991 1 9,820 1 8,063 1
Wastewater Utility Rate Study
City Budget Breakdown
Wastewater
7.9%
36
37
19
Wastewater Utility Expenses
0 Debt Seance 31 9%
11 Personnel 17 2%
0 State /City Taxes 13 3%
0 Charges Seances 10 6%
11 Administrative /Accounting 8 2%
O Cash to CFP 0 0%
91 Administrative Charges 6 2%
0 Supplies 4 5%
I> Non -Operating 2 3%
11 Utilities Expense 41
0 ET Charges 1 7%
Wastewater Rate Study Assumptions
•2010 revenues $170K
•2010 O &M $48K
•Retail wastewater rate sufficient
•2011 rate adjustment proposed 0.0%
•Retail CSO rate based on financing plan
•2011 CSO adjustment proposed 17.7%
•2011 overall rate adjustment 4.5%
•No customer growth in 2011
•No COLA
38
39
20
Wastewater Rate Study Assumptions
•PERS and medical increases
•Use of CSO revenues to fund debt
services
Wastewater Utility Challenges
Combined Sewer Overflow project
Pretreatment progam
Plant dewatering improvements
40
41
21
Wastewater Rate Study Findings
Capital Facilities Plan ($1,000)
Capital Facilities Plan 1 2010 2011
Additional Design for CSO Phase I WW08 -2008 1,100
Preliminary Septage Receiving Station STA Analysis 103
Pump Replacements at PS #3 WW03 -2008 145
Carbon Scrubbers for WWTP WW04 -2008 28 45
Waste Activated Sludge Thickening WW06 -2008 40 260
Sewer Trestle at Francis 8th WW05 -2006 75 400
Directed Services 65
Dry Polymer Feed Replacement WW01 -2008 20 45
Plant Dewatenng Improvements 20 1,320
Digester Mixing Improvements 20
Bi-Annual Line Replacements WW27 -1999 268 300
Task #16 ONP 151
Advanced Metering Infrastructure WT01 -2008 500 613
CSO Phase I Construction WW08 -2008 10,000
PLC /HMI Improvements 100
Total 1 2,534 13,083
Wastewater Rate Study Findings
Capital Facilities Plan Funding Sources ($1,000)
Capital Facilities Plan Funding Sources 1 2010 1 2011
CFP Beginning Cash Balance 3,595 3,374
Construction Contribution
Other Note Proceeds 1,839 1,970
PWTF Loan Proceeds 221 10,000
Cash /Rate Financed Contnbution
DOI/Bureau of Land Management 151
Septic Waste Fund 103
CSO Reserve Fund
ICFP Ending Cash Balance I 3,374 1 2,261
42
43
22
Wastewater Rate Study Findings
With 4.5% Rate Increase
Revenue Requirements ($1,000)
Descnption 1 2010 1 2011
Residential 3,269 3,269
Commercial 1,187 1,210
Septic Disposal 235 235
Leachate 166 166
Combined Sewer Overflow 1,428 1,681
Investment Interest 212 224
Miscellaneous Revenues 151 111
Total Revenues 6,648 1 6,896
O &M 2,113 1,936
Administration General 937 957
Utilities 223 242
Chemicals 50 50
Taxes 761 793
Transfer Payments 1,091 1,025
Debt Service 1,281 1,896
Total Expenses 1 6,458 6,898
Revenues Less Expenses
190 (3)
Wastewater Unrestricted Cash Balance
$4,000
$3,500
$3,000
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
I
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
—Water Ubhty X60 Days O &M
44
45
23
Wastewater Rate Study Findings
With 4.5% Rate Increase
Ending Fund Balances ($1,000)
ITvpe of Reserve
Ending Unrestricted Cash Balance
Ending Rate Stabilization Balance
Ending Combined Sewer Overflow Balance
Septic Waste Cash Balance
Ending Bond Reserves
Ending CFP Balance Wastewater CSO
(Total Reserves
2010 1
3,569
1,130
4,115
900
820
3,374
1 13,909 1
Solid Waste Collection Rate Study
City Budget Breakdown
Collection
3.2%
2011 1
3,567
1,130
5,071
900
820
2,261
13,749 1
Requirement
1,000 60 Days O &M
Discretionary
5,071 CSO Financing Plan
728 Capital Facilities Plan
820 Bond Covenant
2,261 CSO Financing Plan
9,880 1
46
47
24
Collection Utility Expenses
46,4%
1 61 Disposal Charges 29 6%
Recycling Charges 16 8%
Personnel 12 6%
a Equipment Svcs Charges 7 8%
State /City Taxes 10 0%
9jAdmmistrative /Accounting 7 5%
IS Non-Operating 7 9%
Administrative Charges 2 9%
FTCharges 1 5%
Charges Services 1 2%
Supplies 21
Debt Service 0 0%
Collection Rate Study Assumptions
2010 revenues $106K
2010 O &M $50K
Retail rate deficiency 11.9%
2011 retail rate adjustment proposed 0%
No customer growth in 2010
No COLA
PERS and medical increase
increased disposal, recycling, and yard
waste costs
48
49
25
Collection Rate Study Challenges
Increasing recycling efficiency
Increasing yard waste collection
Reducing disposal tonnage
Increasing every other week garbage
collection
Collection Rate Study Findings
With 0% Rate Increase
Revenue Requirements ($1,000)
I Description
Residential Weekly
Residential Every- Other -Week
Residential Yard Waste
Commercial
Commercial Recycling
Investment Interest
Miscellaneous Revenues
'Total Revenues
O &M
Administration General
Disposal Charges
Recycling, Yard Waste, OCC
Taxes
Transfer Payments
Debt Service
'Total Expenses
IRevenues Less Expenses
I
1
2010 1 2011 I
1,240 1,240
794 794
206 206
973 973
4 4
68 64
25 18
3,311 1 3,299 I
895 856
439 434
1,028 1,077
578 608
370 364
195 287
iiiiiiia
50
51
26
Collection Unrestricted Cash Balance
$4,000
$3,500
$3,000
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
—Solid Waste Collection Utility —90 Days 0 &M
Collection Rate Study Findings
With 0% Rate Increase
Ending Fund Balances ($1,000)
Type of Reserve 1 2010 1 2011 1 Requirement 1
Ending Unrestricted Cash Balance 1 3,163 1 2,836 1 800 1 90 Days O &M I
Total Reserves 1 3,163 1 2,836 1 800 1
52
53
27
Transfer Station /Landfill Rate Study
City Budget Breakdown
Transfer
Station 4.4%
Transfer Station Expenses
71.2%
1 Long -Haul Transportation 20 4%
Disposal Charges 20 6%
ID Debt Service 13 1%
8 Transfer Station Operation 10 8%
O Blue Mountain 3 7%
O Composting Operation 2 6%
O State /City Taxes 9 8%
Charges Services 7 1%
Cash to Post Closure 0 0%
Personnel 5 3%
❑Administratve /Accounting 3 0%
O Administrative Charges 2 0%
IT Charges 1 2%
Supplies 0 3%
54
55
28
Transfer Station Rate Study Assumptions
•2010 revenues $523K
•2010 O &M $316K
'Retail rate deficiency 11.4%
•2011 retail rate adjustment proposed 5.0%
-Blue Mountain retail rate adjustment proposed 0%
•No customer growth in 2011
•Planned use of unrestricted reserves through
2011
•No COLA
56
Transfer Station Rate Study Assumptions
•PERS and medical increases
•Service Agreement fees tied to CPI FPI
•Increased operation, long -haul, co-
composting, and disposal service fees
57
29
300
275
250
225
x
200
177
150
600
500
400
200
100
0
A
Sa o
Consumer Price Index Forecast
10' 'YO O 6 'LOO1 ryOO6 'LOOS
Fuel Price Index Forecast
6
aKp )a�
West Coast Actuals West Coast Prediction
58
59
30
Transfer Station Utility Challenges
Economic recession effects tonnage
Expansion of moderate -risk waste
program
Transition to full cost of service rates in
2012
Strong demand for compost
Landfill gas beneficial use RFP
Post closure maintenance costs, risks,
regulation
Transfer Station Rate Study Findings
With 5.0% Rate Increase
Revenue Requirements ($1,000)
Descnption
Collection Entities
Self- Haulers
Yard Waste Compost
lntra -Fund Transfers
Miscellaneous Revenues
Blue Mountain Drop Box
Total Revenues
O &M
Administration General
Transfer Station Operations
Long Haul Disposal
Debt Service
Post Closure Maintenance
Taxes
Transfer Payments
Blue Mountain Drop Box
Total Expenses
Revenues Less Expenses
M
2010 1 2011
2,945 3,092
1,489 1,552
171 174
24 30
647 606
294 294
5,276 1 5,454
582 552
389 363
721 771
2,147 ,2,365
753 753
269 218
499 522
181 196
5,543 5,739
r
60
61
J
31
Transfer Station Unrestricted Cash Balance
$3,500
$3,000
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Transfer Station/Landfill Utility —90 Days O &M
Transfer Station Rate Study Findings
With 5.0% Rate Increase
Ending Fund Balances ($1,000)
ITvpe of Reserve 1 2010 1 2011 1 Requirement I
Ending Unrestricted Cash Balance 2,375 2,090 1,400 90 Days O &M
Ending Closure Balance
Ending CFP Balance
Ending Post Closure Balance 3,621 3,591 3,644 Post Closure Plan
Total Reserves I 5,996 I 5,681 I 5,044 1
62
63
32
Transfer Station Rate Survey
Port Angeles
Port AngelesProposed
Blue Mountain
Blue Mountain Proposed
Oak Harbor
Grays Harbor 1
Jefferson County
Olympic Mew
1
We Waste
$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250
C harge Per Ton
1 $62 02
$83 00
$115 00
$113 96
Stormwater
Stormwater
1.7%
City Budget Breakdown
$169 00
$204 65
$204 65
64
65
33
Stormwater Expenses
Street Charges 31 0%
Personnel 9 2%
State /City Taxes 6 0%
CI Administrative /Accounting 4 9%
Charges Services 28 5%
CI Administrative Charges 4 6%
B IT Charges 1 0%
O Supplies 0 8%
Transfer Payments 12 9%
Debt Seance 1 1%
66
Stormwater Rate Study Assumptions
•2010 revenues $148K
•2010 O &M A $19K
•Estimate retail rate deficiency $4 /ERU
•2011 retail rate adjustment proposed 0.0%
•No customer growth in 2011
•No COLA
•PERS and medical increases
67
34
Stormwater Utility Challenges
NPDES Phase 2 Permit requirements:
1) Development and re- development
activities, and
2) Street and stormwater
maintenance and monitoring activities
2012 Stormwater System Plan
Stormwater Summary
With 0% Rate Increase
Revenue Requirements ($1,000)
Description 1 2010 1 2011 I
Stormwater Revenue 725 725
Investment Interest 8 12
Miscellaneous Revenue 174 51
Total Revenues 1 907 1 787
Street Charges 373 380
Personnel 103 112
Supplies 2 10
O &M 47 200
Administration General 104 127
Taxes 83 73
Transfer Payments 50 278
Debt Service 3 13
'Total Expenses 1 763 1,192
'Revenues Less Expenses
144 (405)
68
69
35
Stormwater Unrestricted Cash Balance
$900
$800
$700
$600
$500
$400
$300
$200
$100
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Stormwater Utility --90 Days O &M
Stormwater Summary
With 0% Rate Increase
Ending Fund Balances ($1,000)
Type of Reserve 1 2010 1 2011 1 Requirement
Ending Unrestricted Cash Balance I 838 I 433 I 300 I 90 Days O &M Ending CIP Cash Balance 17
!Total Reserves 1 855 1 433 1 300 1
70
71
36
Stormwater Rate Survey
Port Angeles t $6 00
Port Angeles- 2011Proposed $600
Poulsbo 1 $7 94
i
Port Townsend $6 59
Centralia 1 $6 00
Walla Walla $325
Ocean Shores
Oak Harbor $9 14
i
Lynnwood 1 $6 70
Kelso I $34
i
Aberdeen 1 56 08
2010AWCSurveyAverage I 1 $786
$0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14
Monthly Charge
Utility Rate Study Summary
Fee adiustments proposed:
Electric work permits
Pole attachments
Water connection fees
Retail rate adjustments proposed:
Electric 2.3%
Wastewater 4.5%
Transfer station 5.0%
No retail rate adjustment proposed:
Water, solid waste collection, stormwater
72
73
37
What's Next?
1. Proceed to City Council to set public hearing
2. October 5, 2010 presentation and public
hearing
3. October 12, 2010 Utility Advisory Committee
recommendation
4.October 19, 2010 public hearing continuation
and adopt ordinance amendments
5. January 3, 2011 new rates and fees in effect
Recommendation
Proceed to City Council to set public hearing
Questions?
74
75
38
PORTANGELES
W A S H I N G T O N U.S.A.
Utility Advisory Committee Memo
Date: September 14, 2010
To: Utility Advisory Committee
From: Larry Dunbar, Deputy Director of Power Systems
Subject: Advanced Metering Infrastructure System Project Update
Summary: Several activities continue to be underway in support of the Advanced Metering
Infrastructure System project.
Recommendation: For information only, no action requested.
Background /Analysis: A commercial and industrial grant application is being prepared to
submit to the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) on or before September 30, 2010 for a
Demand Response (DR) project that would be integrated into the AMI System. A breakfast
meeting with City commercial and industrial customers was held on August 12, 2010. Interested
customers met with BPA's consultant (Global Energy Partners, LLC) on August 23 -24, 2010 to
further explore DR interest and feasibility.
On August 3, 2010, City Council approved a bond ordinance which provides funding for the
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Project. On August 17, 2010, City Council approved the
findings and recommendations of the Retail Tiered Rate Methodology Study to incorporate a
seasonal time -of -use rate with demand into the AMI Project, which will be used to set retail rates
for all Electric Utility retail customer rate classes in the fall of 2011.
Parker LePla is scheduled to present the Communications Plan to the Utility Advisory Committee
at their November 9, 2010 meeting. The BPA recently initiated a related project to educate electric
utilities about demand response. As part of this effort The Brattle Group and Global Energy
Partners, LLC are preparing a curriculum and documents, and staff is involved in this effort in a
review role.
AMI System proposals are continuing to be evaluated and vendors are being interviewed the week
of September 6, 2010. The evaluation process is taking longer than anticipated due to the
complexity of the project, but anticipating vendor evaluations and the negotiation go smoothly,
staff may be requesting the Utility Advisory Committee's recommendation to City Council on the
AMI System Agreement at their October 12, 2010 meeting.
An executive summary of the Utility Advisory Committee involvement in the overall project is
available on the following page.
N \UAC\Final\AMI System Project RFP Update doc
AMI System Project Update
September 14, 2010
Page 2
Milestones
Advertisement
1 Proposal Deadline
1 UAC Consideration
City Council
Consideration
Milestones
UAC Consideration
City Council
Consideration
UAC Consideration
City Council
Consideration
2 Revised dates.
AMI
System
5/10/2010
1 8/6/2010 1
1 10/12/2010 1
10/19/2010
AMI
System
Phase I Construction
3/8/2011
12/11/2011
9/18/2011
Request for Proposals Summary
Scope of Work Summary
3/15/2011
BPA DR
Residential
2/18/2010
4/19/2010 1
7/13/2010 1
7/20/2010
BPA DR Projects
Residential
Phase II Construction
Projects
Commercial Communications
Industrial Plan
6/10/2010
9/30/2010 1
11/9/2010' 1
11/16/2010
Commercial
Industrial
12/11/2011
9/18/2011
5/10/2010 1/25/2010
1 3/5/2010 1
1 4/13/2010 1
8/17/2010 4/20/2010
7/2/2010
8/10/2010
Retail
TRM Study
Communications Retail
Plan TRM Study
Consultant Report
10/12/2010 8/10/2010
10/19/2010 8/17/2010
'Dates are uncertain; the Commercial Industrial DR project grant application is being prepared
at this time.
P 0RT A NGES
W A S H I N G T O N U.S.A.
Utility Advisory Committee Memo
Date: September 14, 2010
To: Utility Advisory Committee
From: Dan McKeen, Fire Chief
Subject: Utility Advisory Committee Medic 1 Representative Application
Summary: The City's Utility Advisory Committee Medic 1 representative announced her
resignation. An application for appointment to the committee was requested and received from
Mr. John Mock for review, interview, and consideration by the Utility Advisory Committee.
Recommendation: After reviewing the application and conducting an interview, consider
forwarding a favorable recommendation to City Council to appoint Mr. John Mock as the
Medic 1 representative on the Utility Advisory Committee.
Background/Analysis: Staff was advised that Ms. Elizabeth Butler needed to resign from her
appointment as the Medic 1 representative to the Utility Advisory Committee due to her departure
from St. Andrews Place.
By Municipal Code, one of the Utility Advisory Committee members shall represent the licensed
care facilities in the City. For purposes of this provision, "licensed care facilities" includes adult
family homes, boarding homes /assisted living facilities, and nursing homes. The representative of
the licensed care facilities shall vote only on issues concerning Medic 1 utility fees authorized by
Part C of PAMC 13.73.370. Mr. John Mock, administrator for Crestwood Convalescent Center,
has submitted his application and requests consideration for the Medic 1 representative position on
the Utility Advisory Committee.
According to the City Council Rules of Procedure, the Utility Advisory Committee needs to
interview the candidate in open public session. After the interview, staff recommends that the
Utility Advisory Committee consider forwarding a favorable recommendation to the City Council
to appoint Mr. John Mock as the Medic 1 representative on the Utility Advisory Committee.
Attachments: Application for appointment from Mr. John Mock to serve on the committee
Letter of support from John LeClerc, Executive Director of Park View Villas
C \Documents and Settings\dmckeen\My Documents\UAC \UAC Medic 1 Member Vacancy 9 14 10 doc
Board, Commission or Committee to which you are seeking appointment:
Applicant Name and General Information
First
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE
(1h1 A3 car/m get
PORTANGELES
WASHINGTON, U.S.A.
E -mail address
1
M� L�
Last
Home Street Address
Ate qr!
City State Zip
160 66( 3731 and —aa 0C
Home phone Work phone Cell phone
Y /316
Date of Birth (to be completed only by applicants for Public Safety Advisory Board for purposes of criminal
history check to ensure compliance with Port Angeles Municipal Code 2.26.020)
Certification and Location Information (circle one)
Are you employed by the City of Port Angeles?
Are you a citizen of the United States?
Are you a City resident?
If so, how long ?-G c,r-S
Do you own /manage a business in the City? es No
Do you hold any professional licenses, registrations or certificates in any field? S No
If so, please list: Pur- (br+C. �IsG'
Are you aware of any conflict of interest which might arise by your service on a City Board or Commission? If so, please
explain:
1✓J
Work Experience List most recent experience first, or attach a resume
Cre a /3o C AJAI-S c1n �.n �a�rd✓�
Employer Title
Briefjob description
Employer Title From (M/Y) To (M/Y)
Briefjob description
Employer Title From (M/Y) To (WY)
Briefjob description
Education List most recent experience first
jkot Pe5 Yes_No
Institutid/Location Degree earned/Major area of study Graduated?
Institution/Location
Institution/Location
Organization/Location
Brief description of your participation:
Degree earned/Major area of study
Degree earned/Major area of study
Charitable, Social and Civic Activities and Memberships List major activities you have participated in
during the last five years pp
"Le+elcn /A-�„ssrq /Aar
Organization/Location Group's purpose/objective of members
Brief description of your participation: To 4i �L actAii+. 1
J
A mural, iY)
J
From (M/Y) To (M/Y)
Yes No
Graduated?
Yes No
Graduated?
Group's purpose /objective of members
2
Questions
•-A {a re c.. 6••'11. s ,..n
n t
Why are you interested :i .se on this particular Board or Commission?
CreS i vv)(5)` t ..t G ?'7 �i rk rs on F :ri i L c
r
Acant Signature
Submit completed forms to:
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
City of Port Angeles
321 E. 5` Street
PO Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
3
What in your background or experience do you think would help you in serving on this Board?
e4 tor.
l
What is your understanding of the responsibilities of tharticular Board or Commission?
pn 11;7 r4...Tr__ 'f tnc e-- arc
pr-0 5 r f r 1�o4 rcNr-s C 1 ('✓cf>44- (9 F
Please feel free to add any additional comments you wish to make regarding your application.
Rl f.�iiv
Date
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special accommodations because of a physical
limitation, please contact the City Manager's Office at 417.4500 so appropriate arrangements can be made.
..0 0644
YCE r k
VILLAS
TO: Utility Advisory Committee
All Interested Parties
FROM: John LeClerc, Executive Director
Park View Villas, Retirement Assisted
Date: September 13, 2010
RE: JOHN MOCK RECOMMENDATION
Dear Utility Advisory Committee:
My name is John LeClerc and I am Executive Director of Park.
View Villas, Retirement and Assisted Living. Please considerthis
memo as a vote of full confidence for John Mock 'Th °reps se_ nt
the long term care providers in Clallam County.
Mr. Mock is very well connected and well known in r C ;l ;of
business professionals for long term care. I work direcfI'*itii__
Mr. Mock for other projects which benefit the Port Angeles
Community and I find his dedication admirable.
If you would like any more information regarding this_
recommendation regarding Mr. Mock, please let me know arkd
would be happy to answer any questions you may have.
Park View Villas 1430 Park View 1:.n 1 Port Angeles, WA 98363 1p 360/452 -7222 1f 360/452 -4958
Bring Retirement to Life 1 www.villageconcepts.com