The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 12/13/2016 r f �r STREETS 10 1 --- PAVEMENT PRESERVATION WINDOW Preventive Good Pavement Preservation window I-- 0 Reconstruction E Re!iabifitatlon Poor Maintenance Time PAVEMENT 'A PAVEMENT CONDITION Excellent Pavement Preservation - Low cost ca is C Good a 0 CD Fair a 75% of life C_ Reactive Maintenance cc c -- Cost dependent on WPoor � 9 condition w o Q Very Poor o ~— Road Reconstruction � � --Very high cost Failed 12%of life 5 10 15 20 AGE OF PAVEMENT PP=Pavement Preservation RM R�irt�:i•f.1,u�t:-aanc. COST ESCALATION OVERTIME saa CLC Good a sa_ r- 60 Fa i r- Resurface(51.75-52.50M) O - _ 40PoorRIFR16billtation($3451sF I O U w 20 E Failed ria a CL Pavement Age STREET FUND REVENUES ■ Property Tax --- Discontinued in 2013 ■ General Fund Contributions --- Property tax to GF to Street fund ■ MotorVehicle Fuel Tax --- State administers (inconsistent funding) ■ Internal Transfers — Street support for other utilities /Alley transfers ■ No Revenue adjustments for Inflation OMC Street Vacation REVENUEVS EXPENDITURES Funds $280K Delta $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $0 — x 2007 2008 .......... 2012 2013 2015 .................. ($100,000) ........... ........... ................................ ............ ($200,000) ($300,000) ($400,000) Year REVENUE SHORTFALL --- RESULT RESULT ■ Not adequately funding operations (using Reserves to balance) ■ No funding for State Grant matches for Capital Improvements (Arterials only) ■ Arterial roads -- 14% of City streets ■ City match requirement -- 12.5% ■ No Funding for Residential street Capital Improvements ■ Residential roads -- 86% of City Streets ■ No State grants allowed -- 100% City funded ■ No funding for new sidewalks,ADA ramps, bike improvements, etc TBD -WHY PORT ■ Pavement Condition Index from 0- 100: ■ COPA is a rated as a"35"...POOR ■ No major road repairs funded since 2010 ■ 18th Street paved 2016 — funded with STP Grant ■ No flexibility for General Fund expansion ■ Asphalt streets will last 20 years...many COPA streets are over 30 years old. ■ It will take a sustained 20 year effort of million budgets to get to GOOD rating due to advance deterioration ■ Transportation Benefit District is only a START, not a final solution "TRANSPORTATIONWHAT IS ■ Ability for local governments to fund transportation improvements ("fenced") ■ Independent taxing district created for sole purpose to acquire, construct, improve, provide and fund transportation improvements in the district ■ Legislative Authority granted in RCW 35.21 .225 ■ Provisions outlined in RCW 36.73.010 RCW 1 10 ■ Enhance municipalities ability to fund transportation improvements to improve transportation performance and necessitated by economic development ■ Allow municipalities to establish TBD to respond to special transportation needs and economic opportunities ■ Facilitate equitable participation for developers whose developments may generate the need for improvements. ■ Foster Cooperation between public and private sectors PROJ ■ Street/Alley Replacement, Repairs, Overlays, and Chip Seals ■ Convert Gravel roads to Asphalt ■ Sidewalk Installation ■ Bridge Repairs ■ Non-motorized facilities : D REVENUE OPTIONS NOT SUBJECTTOVOTER APPROVAL I. Annual vehicle fee up to $20 per vehicle registered within the District.Collected at time of license renewal...and/or 2. Option to increase to $40 per vehicle after 2 years 3. Transportation impact fees on commercial and industrial buildings. Residential buildings excluded. Annual Expected Revenues: $325,000 / year for vehicle fees : D REVENUE OPTIONS SUBJECT TO VOTER APPROVAL: I. Up to 0.2% sales and use tax (paid by all shoppers) ■ 2 cent tax on $10 purchase ■ 2/3 of COPA shoppers live outside City limits 2. Property Tax Levy (paid only by COPA residents) 3. Annual vehicle fee > $20 and < $100 / vehicle registered in the District (paid only by COPA residents) Annual Expected Revenues: ■ $550,000 to $650,000 based on annual sales ■ $325,000 ($20 vehicle fee) up to $1,622,000 ($100 vehicle fee) STEPSTO D ■ Develop policy to address major changes in plan ■ Staff prepare list of proposed projects for Council approval ■ Conduct Public hearing ■ Adopt Ordinance ■ Find that District is in public interest ■ Establish boundaries of District ■ Description of activities or functions ■ Public Vote — If required, could be general ($) or special election ($$$) WHAT 1 $ BUY ■ Street - Pave one gravel street,one block --------- $200,000 ■ Street— Rebuild failed street,one block ----------- $140,000 ■ Street— Grind and overlay,one block -------------- $100,000 ■ Street - Chip seal,one block ------------------------ $ 25,000 ■ Alley - Restore alley,one block (poor condition) --- $100,000 ■ Sidewalk— Build new,one block- one side --------- $ 30,000 ■ ADA Ramp - Build one end of sidewalk ------------- $ 7,000 ■ ADA Ramp - Build one intersection corner --------- $ 10,000414,000 One average block = 500 feet COST FOR PRESERVATION AND REPAIR (281 ��LANE MILES" IN CITY) Cost per Lane Public Works Average Lane Average Cost $120,000 10 - 20 yrs 14 miles $1,680,000 $350,000 20 - 40 yrs 7 miles $2,450,000 $425,000 20 - 40 yrs 7 miles $2,975,000 Method Mile Longevity Miles per year per year Needed Needed Double Chip Seal Overlay-2" Overlay-2" with mesh Complete Rebuild - 3" 0 CAPITAL PROJECTS UNABLETO FUND Capital Facility Projects ■ 10 St Reconstruction (M St to N St) — $700,000 (require Grant match) ■ 10 St Overlay (M St to I St) - $325,000 ■ N St Chipseal (5th to 15th St) - $300,000 ■ 8th St Chipseal (C St to I St) - $200,000 ■ Peabody St Chipseal (Alhvers Rd to Park Ave) $175,000 ■ Park Avenue Chipseal (Race to Liberty) - $325,000 ■ Lauridsen Blvd Chipseal (Lincoln to Ennis) - $550,000 ■ ADA Ramps Francis St / Peabody St - $300,000 / $300,000 ■ Alley restorations CITIZEN PROJECTS Citizen Request Projects ■ Railroad Ave (Lincoln St — Laurel St) ■ Alley Improvements ■ Intersection Street Signs ■ School Sidewalk construction ■ ADA Ramps ■ Solar speed limit signs - $10,000+ each ■ Walkability improvements ■ Bike Lane improvements FUNDED PROJECTS / I -2017) YEAR PROJECT TOTAL COST CITY COST 2014 TR4299—Lauridsen Bridge Replacement(STP Grant/REET,GF,LID) 6,121,000 1.316,000 2014 TR0509- Ediz Hook Erosion Repair(FEMA Grant) 172,000 46,000 2014 TR0514-Signal at Marine Drive and Truck Route 14,000 14,000 2014 TR0609-Tumwater Slide Repair(FEMA Grant) 268,000 134,000 2015 TR 1699— 181h Street Reconstruction(STP Grant) 1,148,000 0 2015 GG01 10—City Hall Parking Lot(GF) 1 16,000 1 16,000 2015 TR9814—Peabody St Repair 100,000 100,000 2016 TRO 1 14—ODT Design:Hill St/Marine Dr(Grant Funded-- Design Only) 200,000 0 2016 TRO 1 I I —Marine Drive Channel Bridge Repair(STP Grant) 698,000 1 13,000 2017 TR0216—Tumwater Bridge Expansion Joint Repair(REET) 210,000 210,000 2017 TR0209—Race St-Complete Street(FLAP Grant-Design Only) 482,000 63,000 NEXT STEP ?