HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 04/04/2017 ORT N LES CITY COUNCIL MEETING
P
s^uMM/PO321 East 5th Street
W A S H I N G T O N, U. S. A.
.vApril 4, 2017
SPECIAL MEETING- 5:00 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING- 6:00 p.m.
The Mayor may determine the order of business for a particular City Council meeting. The agenda should be arranged to best serve
the needs and/or convenience of the Council and the public.Mayor to determine time of break. The items of business for regular Council
meetings may include the following:
A. CALL TO ORDER- SPECIAL MEETING AT 5:00 P.M. —An Executive Session was held under authority of
RCW 42.30.110(1)(i), to discuss potential litigation with legal counsel, and RCW 42.30.110(1)(c), to consider the minimum price at
which real estate will be offered for sale or lease when public knowledge regarding such consideration would cause a likelihood of
decreased price.However,final action selling or leasing public property shall be taken in a meeting open to the public.
CALL TO ORDER-REGULAR MEETING AT 6:00 P.M.
B. ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CEREMONIAL MATTERS, PROCLAMATIONS & EMPLOYEE RECOGNITIONS
1. Volunteer Appreciation Proclamation
C. PUBLIC COMMENT— The City Council desires to allow the opportunity for Public Comment.However, the business of
the City must proceed in an orderly, timely manner.At its most restrictive,Public Comment shall be limited to a total of 15 minutes
for the first Public Comment period and shall be concluded not later than 9:45 for the second Public Comment period.Individuals
may speak for three(3)minutes or less, depending on the number of people wishing to speak.If more than 20 people are signed up to
speak, each speaker may be allocated two (2)minutes. (Council Rules of Procedure Section 12).
D. LATE ITEMS— To be placed on this or future agendas, including any executive session needed during or at the end of the
meeting.
E. CONSENT AGENDA/Approve
1. Expenditure Report:From March ]]`through March 24"in the amount of$3,251,111.25..........................................E-1
2. Overhead Reconductoring,Project CL06-2016/Final Acceptance................................................................................E-31
3. Material Purchase:Yard/Area Light Replacement, Contract MEC 17-04,Project CL02-12 l Award Contract.............E-32
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (6:30 P.M. or soon thereafter)
1. Transportation Benefit District Ordinance/Continue Public Hearing/Conduct 2"a Reading/Adopt Ordinance........F-1
G. ORDINANCES NOT REQUIRING COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS..................................................None
H. RESOLUTIONS NOT REQUIRING PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Update to Personnel Policy&Procedures Manual,Chapter 6—Attendance&Hours of Work ....................................H-1
Mayor to determine time of break/Hearing devices available for those needing assistance.
April 4, 2017 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page- 1
L OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
1. Report on Petition to Elect a Full New City Council if Abandoning City Code Status...................................................I-1
J. CONTRACTS & PURCHASING
1. City Pier Transient Moorage Float Replacement—Project PKI 1-06/Award Contract.................................................J-1
K. COUNCIL REPORTS
L. INFORMATION
City Manager Reports:
1. Update on Change in 2017 Revenue Due to Mill Curtailment........................................................................................L-1
2. Public Works&Utilities Construction Status Report.....................................................................................................L-3
3. Public Works&Utilities Grants and Loans Status Report..............................................................................................L-4
4. Parks,Recreation&Beautification Minutes...................................................................................................................L-6
5. 2017 WellCity Award......................................................................................................................................................L-8
6. Update on Finance Director Recruitment and Selection Process.....................................................................................L-10
M. SECOND PUBLIC COMMENT— The City Council desires to allow the opportunity for Public Comment.However, the
business of the City must proceed in an orderly, timely manner.At its most restrictive,Public Comment shall be limited to a total of 15
minutes for the first Public Comment period and shall be concluded not later than 9:45 for the second Public Comment period.
Individuals may speak for three(3)minutes or less, depending on the number of people wishing to speak.If more than 20 people are
signed up to speak, each speaker may be allocated two (2)minutes. (Council Rules of Procedure Section 12).
ADJOURNMENT—
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings are set by the City Council in order to meet legal requirements. In addition, the City Council may set a public
hearing in order to receive public input prior to making decisions,which impact the citizens. Certain matters may be controversial,
and the City Council may choose to seek public opinion through the public hearing process.
Mayor to determine time of break/Hearing devices available for those needing assistance.
April 4, 2017 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page-2
G\�y OF PORT AA, `mss
�i
PROCLAMATION
In Recognition of
"Volunteer Appreciation Week"
April 3 - 7, 2017
WHEREAS, the City Council and City staff appreciate and recognize the contributions made by
volunteers to the City of Port Angeles and the community. Therefore we dedicate this
week, April 3 through 7, to those who help support the City through their selfless
contributions. Our City relies heavily on those who serve and we would like to say
"thank you" to our faithful volunteers; and
WHEREAS, our volunteers work daily to improve our City. Their dedication and commitment to their
work is truly genuine, and they are passionate about the success of our community; and
WHEREAS, a city cannot solve its problems alone, it is through partnerships with volunteers,
combined with their continued efforts, which allow the City to make a difference.
Volunteers are a large part of what makes Port Angeles a great place to live, work, and
play; and
i
WHEREAS, through the dedication of volunteers, we are able to expand our possibilities and
accomplish goals that might otherwise have been unattainable, all while growing
together as a community; and
WHEREAS, volunteers are true partners with the City,united in their efforts,with sincere concern for
the wellbeing of our community. Volunteers seek to make our City safer and stronger; �
and
WHEREAS, our volunteers are vital to the sustainability of the City and are truly the heartbeat of our
community.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Patrick Downie, Mayor, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
PORT ANGELES, and, Dan McKeen, City Manager, ON BEHALF OF THE STAFF OF THE
CITY OF PORT ANGELES, do hereby RECOGNIZE our community volunteers by declaring April 3
through 7, 2017, as "Volunteer Appreciation Week." We thank you for your continued direction, selfless
dedicatio and tireless support.
P ck Downie, Mayor Dan McKeen, City Manager
April 4, 2017
City Council Meeting
PUBLIC COMMENT SIGN-UP SHEET
l,
Topic
Are you a City of
Port Angeles resident
or business owner?
Yes or No
AddressPrint Name Clearly
(") - u"f V-(( e----...DB/ r3ti stqon=s,IYIoore he..d
Yes oril.Lt g€(A
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Page I
April4,2017
Taur,uichtTi Tfl>,''-74.'I
Yes or No
Code Choice PA/Fluoride Choice PA Choice 3/17/17
This statement is currently posted.
I represent two Facebook groups, Code Choice PA and Fluoride Choice PA,
though separate groups they are united by a single cause, correctiing the wrong of
a misguided petition. We want to make it clear that we are an unfinanced
grassroots group. We don't have a career political activist who has pushed anti-
fluoride in Port Angeles for over ten years. tart p.-11www.yes4c1ean water.orqlhistory.php
We don't have 750 hardcore supporters who have blindly signed a petition for
someone who knew well and clear that the wording was misleading.
Make no doubts, this individual is working to load this council and realize their
own personal legacy of beating the big guys, ADA and AMA. All without any
regard for us, the residents of Port Angeles. These bullying tactics and
"alternative"' facts stop here, they stop now.
We as a group will work to accomplish three things:
• Defend our residents right to LEARN the facts on, these issues.
• Defend our resident's rights to make their own CHOICE, and finally
• Defend and encourage our residents right to, VOTE for that choice,
All of us have heard tonight the ultimate legal definitions for this complicated
petition.
We will campaign to educate.
Generally speaking, legal speak is gibberish to most people, so in simple terms
Cities are made up of two things,
,
Class— ls , 2nd, Code and
Type — mayor/council and manager/ council.
When they made code city options they gave an easy in and out, in the event that
a 2nd class wanted code or if code wanted to go back to 2nd class. Nowhere in any
form does it take a change of council to do this.
Code Choice RA/RuortOe Choice PA Choice 3/17/17
Interesting fact, since this petition has started the 9 remaining second class cities
are now 6. Chewelah and Colville moved to code in 2016 and Colfax in 2017. Class
change, paperwork only. Even Port Orchard, a proudly fluoridated community has
held public comment where only three people spoke to the issue. It was brought
forward on March 281" and with a positive public survey was unanimously
approved to aclopt, Intent to Change to Code. Paperwork only.
http,-Ilwww.kitsapooilynews.comlne,wslcode-city-port-orchard-changes-its-city-clossificationI
Our hope and request is that the individual responsible for bringing forth this
petition and everything it entails will retract and request that the City council
decline to place the reclassification vote on the ballot.
http://Mrsc.orgINomelResearch-ToolslWoshington-City-and-Town-Profiles.aspx
City Population County Class Form of Government
Chewelah 2650 Stevens Seeend - Code Mayor-Council
Colfax 2795 Whitman Second - Code Mayor-Council
Colville 4730 Stevens Sec-eRd - Code Mayor-Council
Davenport 1690 Lincoln ISecond Mayor-Council
Palouse 1040 Whitman Second Mayor-Council
Port Orchard 13810 Kitsap Second - P. Mayor-Council
Ritzville 1660 Adams Second Mayor-Council
Tekoa 780 Whitman Second Mayor-Council
Wapato 1501401 _____�akima Second Mayor-Council
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
BILL'S PLUMBING & HEATING INC RAYONIER SANIKAN 001-0000-239.96-00 90.00
MISC DEPOSIT& PERMIT REFUNDS DEPOSIT REFUND SENIOR CEN 001-0000-239.93-00 50.00
DEPOSIT REFUND SENIOR CEN 001-0000-239.93-00 150.00
CITY PIER& GATEWAY DEPOS 001-0000-239.10-00 500.00
C8 SELL SACK PROPERTY& M 001-0000-237.30-00 188.16
VERN BURTON DEPOSIT REFUN 001-0000-239.10-00 200.00
PTM DOCUMENT SYSTEMS, INC SUPPLIES 001-0000-237.00-00 (8.35)
SYMBOLARTS, LLC POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-0000-237.00-00 (27.72)
POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-0000-237.00-00 (62.25)
POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-0000-237.00-00 (40.16)
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT AAA batteries 001-0000-237.00-00 (0.84)
SYSTEM
Street Elbows/Sprinklers 001-0000-237.00-00 (17.83)
Sprinklers/Valves 001-0000-237.00-00 (71.04)
Permit Counter Printer 001-0000-237.00-00 (145.49)
Subscription 001-0000-237.00-00 (50.40)
Fire Hose Nozzles 001-0000-237.00-00 (3.75)
Duty Boots/Hobble-Powless 001-0000-237.00-00 (19.70)
Equipment Tags 001-0000-237.00-00 (6.40)
Labels for code compliant 001-0000-237.00-00 (3.91)
Portable Radio Batteries 001-0000-237.00-00 (31.69)
Sprinklers 001-0000-237.00-00 (13.58)
Sprinklers 001-0000-237.00-00 (11.59)
Book-Informed Decision Ma 001-0000-237.00-00 (5.04)
Financial Forecasting Boo 001-0000-237.00-00 (5.04)
City Credit Card Pmt 001-0000-213.10-95 (24,235.02)
2G USB flash drive memory 001-0000-237.00-00 (3.13)
Adjustable desk and chair 001-0000-237.00-00 (57.96)
ID card supplies 001-0000-237.00-00 (12.44)
City Credit Card Pmt 001-0000-213.10-95 22,047.07
2G USB flash drive memory 001-0000-237.00-00 3.13
AAA batteries 001-0000-237.00-00 0.84
Adjustable desk and chair 001-0000-237.00-00 57.96
Book-Informed Decision Ma 001-0000-237.00-00 5.04
City Credit Card Pmt 001-0000-213.10-95 (22,047.07)
Page 1 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 1
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT City Credit Card Pmt 001-0000-213.10-95 24,235.02
SYSTEM
Duty Boots/Nobble-Powless 001-0000-237.00-00 19.70
Equipment Tags 001-0000-237.00-00 6.40
Financial f=orecasting Soo 001-0000-237.00-00 5.04
Fire Nose Nozzles 001-0000-237.00-00 3.75
ID card supplies 001-0000-237.00-00 12.44
Labels for code compliant 001-0000-237.00-00 3.91
Permit Counter Printer 001-0000-237.00-00 145.49
Portable Radio Batteries 001-0000-237.00-00 31.69
Sprinklers 001-0000-237.00-00 11.59
Sprinklers 001-0000-237.00-00 13.58
Sprinklers/Valves 001-0000-237.00-00 71.04
Street Elbows/Sprinklers 001-0000-237.00-00 17.83
Subscription 001-0000-237.00-00 50.40
Division Total: $1,039.68
Department Total: $1,039.68
OLYMPIC MEDICAL CENTER CATERING FOR STRATEGIC PL 001-1160-511.41-50 150.50
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Registration-Downie/Bruch 001-1160-511.43-10 600.00
SYSTEM
Items for Council workses 001-1160-511.31-01 44.77
Items for Council workses 001-1160-511.31-01 (44.77)
Registration-Downie/Bruch 001-1160-511.43-10 (600.00)
Mayor&Council Division Total: $150.50
Legislative Department Total: $150.50
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC EMBOSSING/ENGRAVING 001-1210-513.31-01 5.99
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-1210-513.31-01 5.20
SUPPLIES 001-1210-513.31-01 3.24
PTM DOCUMENT SYSTEMS, INC SUPPLIES 001-1210-513.31-01 107.71
SPITZER, HUGH D. CONSULTING SERVICES 001-1210-513.41-50 3,885.00
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Registration-D McKeen 001-1210-513.43-10 200.00
SYSTEM
Various items for City me 001-1210-513.31-01 19.78
Batteries for microphone/ 001-1210-513.31-01 19.91
2G USB flash drive memory 001-1210-513.31-01 40.31
PA Business Assoc Mtg-D M 001-1210-513.31-01 14.38
Kiwanis Presentation Brea 001-1210-513.31-01 17.91
2G USB flash drive memory 001-1210-513.31-01 (40.31)
Page 2 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 2
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
US HANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Batteries for microphone/ 001-1210-513.31-01 (19.91)
SYSTEM
Kiwanis Presentation Brea 001-1210-513.31-01 (17.91)
PA Business Assoc Mtg-D M 001-1210-513.31-01 (14.38)
Registration-D McKeen 001-1210-513.43-10 (200.00)
Various items for City me 001-1210-513.31-01 (19.78)
City Manager Division Total: $4,007.14
NSA BANK CONSULTING SERVICES 001-1220-516.41-50 42.50
Human Resources Division Total: $42.50
LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING MANAGEMENT SERVICES 001-1230-514.41-50 5.92
MANAGEMENT SERVICES 001-1230-514.41-50 35.52
MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 001-1230-514.41-50 10,487.79
SOUND PUBLISHING INC COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-1230-514.44-10 61.62
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Reg istration-Veneklasen 001-1230-514.43-10 375.00
SYSTEM
Reg istration-Veneklasen 001-1230-514.43-10 (375.00)
City Clerk Division Total: $10,590.85
City Manager Department Total: $14,640.49
MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE LODGING REIMBURSEMENT-BAI 001-2010-514.41-50 70.66
REIMBURSEMENT
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2010-514.31-01 10.02
PACIFICA LAW GROUP, LLP MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 001-2010-514.41-50 228.00
PROTHMAN CONSULTING SERVICES 001-2010-514.41-50 3,780.70
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT WFOA Memberships 001-2010-514.49-01 100.00
SYSTEM
Adobe Training Classes 001-2010-514.43-10 1,050.00
Book-Informed Decision Ma 001-2010-514.31-01 65.04
Airfare-Kheriaty 001-2010-514.43-10 227.20
Airfare-Kheriaty 001-2010-514.43-10 237.95
Lodging Reservation-Kheri 001-2010-514.43-10 217.82
2017 SUGA Training Regist 001-2010-514.43-10 410.00
2017 SUGA Training Regist 001-2010-514.43-10 (410.00)
Adobe Training Classes 001-2010-514.43-10 (1,050.00)
Airfare-Kheriaty 001-2010-514.43-10 (237.95)
Airfare-Kheriaty 001-2010-514.43-10 (227.20)
Book-Informed Decision Ma 001-2010-514.31-01 (65.04)
Lodging Reservation-Kheri 001-2010-514.43-10 (217.82)
WFOA Memberships 001-2010-514.49-01 (100.00)
Page 3 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 3
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
Finance Administration Division Total: $4,089.38
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-2023-514.31-01 44.55
US SANK CORPORATE PAYMENT WFOA Memberships 001-2023-514.49-01 200.00
SYSTEM
Office Supplies 001-2023-514.31-01 6.37
Financial f=orecasting Soo 001-2023-514.43-10 65.04
Financial Forecasting Boo 001-2023-514.43-10 (65.04)
Office Supplies 001-2023-514.31-01 (6.37)
WFOA Memberships 001-2023-514.49-01 (200.00)
Accounting Division Total: $44.55
DATABAR INCORPORATED MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 001-2025-514.41-50 2,129.18
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 001-2025-514.41-50 1,805.26
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 001-2025-514.41-50 2,178.57
LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP PW CONSTRUCTION & RELATED 001-2025-514.31-80 132.38
SOUND PUBLISHING INC COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-2025-514.44-10 71.85
Customer Service Division Total: $6,317.24
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Mailing Labels 001-2080-514.31-01 34.68
SYSTEM
Mailing Labels 001-2080-514.31-01 (34.68)
Reprographics Division Total: $0.00
CLALLAM CNTY TREASURER SUPPLIES 001-2099-519.47-10 49,178.27
SUPPLIES 001-2099-519.47-10 29.31
General Unspecified Division Total: $49,207.58
Finance Department Total: $59,658.75
THOMSON REUTERS-WEST LIBRARY SERVICES(EXCL 908 001-3010-515.31-01 557.71
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT WSAMA Memberships 001-3010-515.49-01 30.00
SYSTEM
2017 WSBA License-Bloor 001-3010-515.49-01 415.00
Fee for paying license on 001-3010-515.49-01 10.38
2017 WSBA License-Greenwo 001-3010-515.49-01 415.00
Fee for paying license on 001-3010-515.49-01 10.38
Membership App-N McKeen 001-3010-515.49-01 25.00
PRA Train ing-DeFrang 001-3010-515.49-01 25.00
PRA Training-N McKeen 001-3010-515.49-01 25.00
Bargaining/Arbitration Co 001-3010-515.43-10 350.00
2017 WSBA License-Bloor 001-3010-515.49-01 (415.00)
2017 WSBA License-Greenwo 001-3010-515.49-01 (415.00)
Bargaining/Arbitration Co 001-3010-515.43-10 (350.00)
Page 4 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 4
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT f=ee for paying license on 001-3010-515.49-01 (10.38)
SYSTEM
Fee for paying license on 001-3010-515.49-01 (10.38)
Membership App-H McKeen 001-3010-515.49-01 (25.00)
PRA Train ing-DeFrang 001-3010-515.49-01 (25.00)
PRA Training-H McKeen 001-3010-515.49-01 (25.00)
WSAMA Memberships 001-3010-515.49-01 (30.00)
Attorney Office Division Total: $557.71
CLALLAM CNTY COMMISSIONER'S SUPPLIES 001-3012-598.51-23 68,000.00
OFFICE
Jail Contributions Division Total: $68,000.00
Attorney Department Total: $68,557.71
ADVANCED TRAVEL Puget Sound Summit-West 001-4010-558.43-10 134.30
BUILDERS EXCHANGE OF WA INC COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 45.00
SOUND PUBLISHING INC COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 48.98
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 55.30
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 342.00
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 71.10
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 77.42
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 001-4010-558.44-10 47.95
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Office calendar-Brekke 001-4010-558.31-01 9.39
SYSTEM
Permit Counter Printer 001-4010-558.31-60 1,877.45
Peninsula Planners f=orum 001-4010-558.31-01 26.93
Office calendar-Brekke 001-4010-558.31-01 (9.39)
Peninsula Planners f=orum 001-4010-558.31-01 (26.93)
Permit Counter Printer 001-4010-558.31-60 (1,877.45)
Planning Division Total: $822.05
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT AAA batteries 001-4020-524.31-01 10.74
SYSTEM
Labels for code compliant 001-4020-524.31-01 50.41
Mailing fee-return of dup 001-4020-524.31-01 19.17
AAA batteries 001-4020-524.31-01 (10.74)
Labels for code compliant 001-4020-524.31-01 (50.41)
Mailing fee-return of dup 001-4020-524.31-01 (19.17)
Building Division Total: $0.00
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Lunch Mtg-West McEntyre H 001-4071-558.31-01 12.22
SYSTEM
Mtg w/LM Investors-Breeke 001-4071-558.31-01 33.67
Page 5 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 5
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT PA Business Assoc-West 001-4071-558.31-01 14.34
SYSTEM
PA Business Assoc-West 001-4071-558.31-01 16.82
Tourism Comm Mtg-West 001-4071-558.31-01 18.00
Lunch Mtg-West McEntyre H 001-4071-558.31-01 (12.22)
Mtg w/LM Investors-Breeke 001-4071-558.31-01 (33.67)
PA Business Assoc-West 001-4071-558.31-01 (16.82)
PA Business Assoc-West 001-4071-558.31-01 (14.34)
Tourism Comm Mtg-West 001-4071-558.31-01 (18.00)
Economic Development Division Total: $0.00
Community Development Department Total: $822.05
GALLS POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5010-521.31-11 39.64
POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5010-521.31-11 27.09
INTL ASSN OF CHIEFS OF POLICE MEMBERSHIPS 001-5010-521.49-01 150.00
SOUND PUBLISHING INC PD0000577805 001-5010-521.31-01 135.20
SQUAD ROOM EMBLEMS POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5010-521.31-11 253.13
SYMBOLARTS, LLC POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5010-521.31-11 357.72
POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5010-521.31-11 518.16
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Adesive/Hardware 001-5010-521.31-01 9.07
SYSTEM
Uniform shoes 001-5010-521.20-80 140.87
Adesive/Hardware 001-5010-521.31-01 (9.07)
Uniform shoes 001-5010-521.20-80 (140.87)
VERIZON WIRELESS 02-28 A/C 842085938-00001 001-5010-521.42-10 48.00
Police Administration Division Total: $1,528.94
LINCOLN STREET STATION EXTERNAL LABOR 001-5021-521.42-10 10.19
EXTERNAL LABOR 001-5021-521.42-10 40.74
THOMSON REUTERS-WEST SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 001-5021-521.41-50 280.84
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Homicide Conf-Arand 001-5021-521.43-10 300.00
SYSTEM
Homicide Conf-E Smith 001-5021-521.43-10 300.00
Homicide Conf-Martin 001-5021-521.43-10 300.00
Homicide Conf-Peninger 001-5021-521.43-10 300.00
Tuition-Practical Homicid 001-5021-521.43-10 1,170.00
Adjustable desk and chair 001-5021-521.31-01 747.96
Adjustable desk and chair 001-5021-521.31-01 (747.96)
Homicide Conf-Arand 001-5021-521.43-10 (300.00)
Homicide Conf-E Smith 001-5021-521.43-10 (300.00)
Page 6 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 6
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Homicide Conf-Martin 001-5021-521.43-10 (300.00)
SYSTEM
Homicide Conf-Peninger 001-5021-521.43-10 (300.00)
Tuition-Practical Homicid 001-5021-521.43-10 (1,170.00)
VERIZON WIRELESS 02-28 A/C 842085938-00001 001-5021-521.42-10 144.00
Investigation Division Total: $475.77
ADVANCED TRAVEL CJTC Observe Night Mock-M 001-5022-521.43-10 219.37
GALLS POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5022-521.31-11 (52.02)
POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5022-521.31-11 12.47
POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5022-521.31-11 343.28
POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5022-521.31-11 1,061.06
CLOTHING &APPAREL 001-5022-521.31-11 173.84
CLOTHING &APPAREL 001-5022-521.31-11 298.09
POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5022-521.31-11 17.29
POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5022-521.31-11 28.72
POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5022-521.31-11 37.48
POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5022-521.31-11 5.41
GENERAL DYNAMICS OTS HUMAN SERVICES 001-5022-521.43-10 590.00
GRAINGER HOSP BURG ACCES& SUNDRIS 001-5022-521.31-80 134.38
HOSP BURG ACCES& SUNDRIS 001-5022-521.31-80 268.76
LINCOLN STREET STATION EXTERNAL LABOR 001-5022-521.42-10 74.94
OLYMPIC MEDICAL CENTER HEALTH RELATED SERVICES 001-5022-521.49-90 164.00
OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC PRINTING,SILK SCR,TYPSET 001-5022-521.31-01 65.04
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPP 001-5022-521.48-10 489.66
PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING HUMAN SERVICES 001-5022-521.43-10 495.00
COUNCIL
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-5022-521.31-01 3.76
SYMBOLARTS, LLC POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5022-521.31-11 803.25
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Duty Boots/Hobble-Powless 001-5022-521.31-11 254.18
SYSTEM
Jacket-467 001-5022-521.31-11 274.23
Jackets-470/480 001-5022-521.31-11 548.44
Duty Boots/Hobble-Powless 001-5022-521.31-11 (254.18)
Jacket-467 001-5022-521.31-11 (274.23)
Jackets-470/480 001-5022-521.31-11 (548.44)
VERIZON WIRELESS 02-28 A/C 842085938-00001 001-5022-521.42-10 624.64
Patrol Division Total: $5,858.42
Page 7 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 7
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
CAPTAIN T'S MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 001-5026-521.31-11 9.76
GALLS POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5026-521.31-11 117.01
POLICE EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY 001-5026-521.31-11 51.87
Reserves &Volunteers Division Total: $178.64
MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE RT AIRFARE SAN ANTONIO- 001-5029-521.43-10 381.38
REIMBURSEMENT
QUILL CORPORATION COMPUTERS,DP &WORD PROC. 001-5029-521.31-01 494.48
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT WAPRQ Membership-Carino 001-5029-521.49-01 25.00
SYSTEM
ID card supplies 001-5029-521.31-01 160.44
ID card supplies 001-5029-521.31-01 (160.44)
WAPRQ Membership-Carino 001-5029-521.49-01 (25.00)
WAPRQ HUMAN SERVICES 001-5029-521.43-10 175.00
HUMAN SERVICES 001-5029-521.43-10 175.00
Records Division Total: $1,225.86
Police Department Total: $9,267.63
ADVANCED TRAVEL NW Leadership Conf-Dubuc 001-6010-522.43-10 258.40
CAPTAIN T'S CLOTHING &APPAREL 001-6010-522.20-80 82.21
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC PAPER (OFFICE,PRINT SHOP) 001-6010-522.31-01 115.56
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Wall Calendar 001-6010-522.31-01 14.75
SYSTEM
Dinner-Public Safety Advi 001-6010-522.31-01 64.91
PAFD HR Packets 001-6010-522.31-01 5.64
Dinner-Public Safety Advi 001-6010-522.31-01 (64.91)
PAFD HR Packets 001-6010-522.31-01 (5.64)
Wall Calendar 001-6010-522.31-01 (14.75)
Fire Administration Division Total: $456.17
ADVANCED TRAVEL Leadership Seminar-Mason/ 001-6020-522.43-10 448.00
CURTIS &SONS INC, L N BUILDER'S SUPPLIES 001-6020-522.31-02 313.07
PLASTICS 001-6020-522.31-02 688.37
GALLS CLOTHING &APPAREL 001-6020-522.20-80 77.81
MCFALL, BARBARA SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 001-6020-522.41-50 300.00
MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE BIEKER REIMBURSEMENT FOR 001-6020-522.43-10 300.00
REIMBURSEMENT
BUSINESS 164 001-6020-522.43-10 483.64
WORD, EXCEL, COMMUNICATIO 001-6020-522.43-10 822.00
RICHMOND 2-WAY RADIO RADIO &TELECOMMUNICATION 001-6020-522.31-14 1,411.37
SEAWESTERN INC RENTAL/LEASE EQUIPMENT 001-6020-522.35-01 909.14
Page 8 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 8
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
SUNSET DC7-IT BEST HARDWARE SUPPLIES 001-6020-522.31-02 86.71
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC; MASS TRANS,AC;C;ES& PARTS 001-6020-522.31-01 12.98
SUPPLIES 001-6020-522.31-01 8.10
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Equipment Tags 001-6020-522.31-01 82.60
SYSTEM
Portable Radio Batteries 001-6020-522.31-14 408.89
Equipment Tags 001-6020-522.31-01 (82.60)
Portable Radio Batteries 001-6020-522.31-14 (408.89)
Fire Suppression Division Total: $5,861.19
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT IFC; Plan Review Training 001-6030-522.43-10 125.00
SYSTEM
Lodging Plan Review Class 001-6030-522.43-10 275.16
IFC; Plan Review Training 001-6030-522.43-10 (125.00)
Lodging Plan Review Class 001-6030-522.43-10 (275.16)
Fire Prevention Division Total: $0.00
MISC; CINE-TIME VENDORS VELCRO NAME TAG 001-6040-522.31-01 114.20
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Subscription 001-6040-522.43-10 650.40
SYSTEM
Subscription 001-6040-522.43-10 (650.40)
Fire Training Division Total: $114.20
FERRELLGAS INC; AUTO &TRUCK ACCESSORIES 001-6050-522.47-10 13.01
MISC; CINE-TIME VENDORS FD DISHWASHER REPAIR 001-6050-522.48-10 172.36
OLYMPIC; PARTY& CUSTODIAL HOSP BURG AC;C;ES& SUNDRIS 001-6050-522.31-01 95.54
SUPPLIES
REED'S JANITORIAL BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 001-6050-522.41-50 425.00
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC; REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT 001-6050-522.31-20 24.29
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Laundry Soap-upstairs 001-6050-522.31-01 4.95
SYSTEM
Laundry Soap-upstairs 001-6050-522.31-01 (4.95)
Facilities Maintenance Division Total: $730.20
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Breakfast Training 001-6060-525.31-01 74.21
SYSTEM
Lunch Training 001-6060-525.31-01 32.51
Breakfast Training 001-6060-525.31-01 (74.21)
Lunch Training 001-6060-525.31-01 (32.51)
Emergency Management Division Total: $0.00
Fire Department Total: $7,161.76
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Registration-Bender 001-7010-532.43-10 1,000.00
SYSTEM
Training-McIntyre 001-7010-532.43-10 824.00
Registration-Bender 001-7010-532.43-10 (1,000.00)
Page 9 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 9
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Training-McIntyre 001-7010-532.43-10 (824.00)
SYSTEM
Public Works Admin. Division Total: $0.00
Public Works& Utilities Department Total: $0.00
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC SUPPLIES 001-8010-574.31-01 57.24
Parks Administration Division Total: $57.24
CENTURYLINK-QWEST 03-05 A/C 3604529861819B 001-8012-555.42-10 51.57
Senior Center Division Total: $51.57
ANGELES MILLWORK& LUMBER SUPPLIES 001-8050-536.31-20 47.06
MATTHEWS BRONZE PA HUMAN SERVICES 001-8050-536.34-01 121.13
MISC DEPOSIT& PERMIT REFUNDS C1 LOT SELL BACK TO CITY. 001-8050-343.60-12 190.00
C1 SELL BACK PROPERTY& M 001-8050-343.60-12 1,700.00
C2 SELL BACK PROPERTY& M 001-8050-343.60-14 1,100.00
C3 SELL BACK PROPERTY& M 001-8050-343.60-14 875.00
C4 SELL BACK PROPERTY& M 001-8050-343.60-16 620.00
C5 SELL BACK PROPERTY& M 001-8050-343.60-13 1,184.00
C6 SELL BACK PROPERTY& M 001-8050-343.60-15 436.00
QUIRING MONUMENTS INC HUMAN SERVICES 001-8050-536.34-01 770.00
HUMAN SERVICES 001-8050-536.34-01 1,704.00
Ocean View Cemetery Division Total: $8,747.19
ANGELES MILLWORK& LUMBER SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 66.24
FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8080-576.31-20 23.64
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 174.83
OLYMPIC LAUNDRY& DRY SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-01 95.39
CLEANERS
SKAGIT GARDENS INC NURSERY STOCK&SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-40 3,646.99
STEUBER DISTRIBUTING INC NURSERY STOCK&SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-40 1,560.31
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 001-8080-576.31-20 28.72
SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-01 32.17
SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 2.99
SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 119.57
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC SPORTING &ATHLETIC EQUIP 001-8080-576.31-20 1,159.88
PAINTING EQUIPMENT&ACC 001-8080-576.31-20 44.58
SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 12.98
FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-01 91.71
Page 10 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 10
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-01 134.31
FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-01 142.98
FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-01 150.00
FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-01 116.96
FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-01 121.30
FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-01 134.31
FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-20 144.97
SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 79.93
SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 48.68
FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-01 142.98
FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8080-576.31-01 151.65
THURMAN SUPPLY SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 9.95
US SANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Street Elbows/Sprinklers 001-8080-576.31-20 230.07
SYSTEM
Sprinklers/Valves 001-8080-576.31-20 916.74
Fire Nose Nozzles 001-8080-576.31-20 48.31
Sprinklers 001-8080-576.31-20 149.48
Sprinklers 001-8080-576.31-20 175.15
Shipping costs for return 001-8080-576.31-01 29.34
Membership dues-Keohokalo 001-8080-576.49-01 85.00
Fire Nose Nozzles 001-8080-576.31-20 (48.31)
Membership dues-Keohokalo 001-8080-576.49-01 (85.00)
Shipping costs for return 001-8080-576.31-01 (29.34)
Sprinklers 001-8080-576.31-20 (175.15)
Sprinklers 001-8080-576.31-20 (149.48)
Sprinklers/Valves 001-8080-576.31-20 (916.74)
Street Elbows/Sprinklers 001-8080-576.31-20 (230.07)
Parks Facilities Division Total: $8,438.02
Parks& Recreation Department Total: $17,294.02
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY INC BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 001-8112-555.48-10 3,031.25
Senior Center Facilities Division Total: $3,031.25
ANGELES MILLWORK& LUMBER SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 43.96
CED/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 001-8131-518.31-20 393.87
CENTURYLINK-QWEST 03-02 A/C 36041753287848 001-8131-518.42-10 48.30
03-05 A/C 36045239542688 001-8131-518.42-10 98.85
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 001-8131-518.31-01 493.18
Page 11 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 11
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
SUPPLYWORKS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-01 7,089.69
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 894.30
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 001-8131-518.31-20 219.77
THURMAN SUPPLY SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 29.26
US SANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Gaffers Tape 001-8131-518.31-20 627.44
SYSTEM
Floor cover for kitchen f 001-8131-518.31-20 73.27
Floor cover for kitchen f 001-8131-518.31-20 (73.27)
Gaffers Tape 001-8131-518.31-20 (627.44)
Central Svcs Facilities Division Total: $9,311.18
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC SUPPLIES 001-8155-575.41-50 342.00
Facility Rentals Division Total: $342.00
Facilities Maintenance Department Total: $12,684.43
BAILEY SIGNS& GRAPHICS FLAGS,POLES,BANNERS,ACCES 001-8221-574.31-01 1,582.64
DRAKE'S PIZZA&SUBS SUPPLIES 001-8221-574.31-01 455.75
EDGAR, KELSEY REFEREE PAYMENT FOR CITY 001-8221-574.41-50 600.00
ELLIS, JESTINE L REFEREE PAYMENT FOR VOLLE 001-8221-574.41-50 330.00
HEILMAN, JOHN REFEREE PAYMENT FOR VOLLE 001-8221-574.41-50 15.00
HENSEN, JAMES C REFEREE PAYMENT FOR CITY 001-8221-574.41-50 432.00
MCKNIGHT,JENISE SCOREKEEPER PAYMENT FOR M 001-8221-574.41-50 110.00
MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT FOR HOTEL R 001-8221-574.41-50 324.76
REIMBURSEMENT
RAMSEY, SCOTT REFEREE PAYMENT FOR CITY 001-8221-574.41-50 168.00
ROBINSON,JASON SCOREKEEPER PAYMENT FOR C 001-8221-574.41-50 500.00
ROONEY, RANDY L REFEREE PAYMENT FOR VOLLE 001-8221-574.41-50 345.00
STOFFERAHN, DAVID D. REFEREE PAYMENT FOR CITY 001-8221-574.41-50 312.00
Sports Programs Division Total: $5,175.15
Recreation Activities Department Total: $5,175.15
General Fund Fund Total: $196,452.17
VERTIGO MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES 101-1430-557.41-50 1,631.27
Lodging Excise Tax Division Total: $1,631.27
Lodging Excise Tax Department Total: $1,631.27
Lodging Excise Tax Fund Total: $1,631.27
ALPINE PRODUCTS, INC PW CONSTRUCTION & RELATED 102-7230-542.31-25 1,809.52
ANGELES CONCRETE PRODUCTS ROAD/HWY MAT NONASPHALTIC 102-7230-542.31-20 130.08
ANGELES MILLWORK& LUMBER ROAD/HWY MAT NONASPHALTIC 102-7230-542.31-25 (16.26)
Page 12 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 12
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
ANGELES MILLWORK& LUMBER ROAD/NWY MAT NONASPHALTIC 102-7230-542.31-25 200.80
CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS INC COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MIC 102-7230-542.48-02 1,951.20
LIBRARY SERVICES(EXCL 908 102-7230-542.48-02 1,534.94
COLUMBIA RURAL ELECTRIC SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 102-7230-542.43-10 182.60
ASSN, INC
FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 102-7230-542.31-01 51.31
NAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWER 102-7230-542.35-01 153.45
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 102-7230-542.31-25 25.07
LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC ROAD/NWY MATERIALS ASPHLT 102-7230-542.31-20 1,677.71
MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE MEAL REIMBURSEMENTS 102-7230-542.31-01 55.50
REIMBURSEMENT
MEAL REIMBURSEMENTS 102-7230-542.31-01 55.50
MEAL REIMBURSEMENTS 102-7230-542.31-01 55.50
PUD#1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 102-7230-542.47-10 36.56
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 102-7230-542.47-10 10.52
ROADWISE, INC SALT (SODIUM CHLORIDE) 102-7230-542.31-05 6,758.64
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, PAINTING EQUIPMENT&ACC 102-7230-542.35-01 7,391.60
THE
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWER 102-7230-542.35-01 60.47
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.31-25 58.47
PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 102-7230-542.31-20 112.83
TAPE(NOT DP,SOUND,VIDEO) 102-7230-542.31-20 2.51
SUPPLIES 102-7230-542.31-20 27.06
SUPPLYWORKS OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 102-7230-542.31-01 60.75
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 102-7230-542.35-01 180.83
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 102-7230-542.31-01 49.48
TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPLY CO MARKERS, PLAQUES,SIGNS 102-7230-542.31-25 7,792.83
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Shorelines Permit-Edit Ho 102-7230-542.41-50 150.00
SYSTEM
Shorelines Permit-Edit Ho 102-7230-542.41-50 (150.00)
Street Division Total: $30,409.47
Public Works-Street Department Total: $30,409.47
Street Fund Total: $30,409.47
QUALITY LOGO PRODUCTS AUTO &TRUCK ACCESSORIES 107-0000-237.00-00 (62.67)
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Power adapter 107-0000-237.00-00 (2.94)
SYSTEM
Power adapter 107-0000-237.00-00 2.94
Division Total: ($62.67)
Page 13 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 13
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
Department Total ($62.67)
ADVANCED TRAVEL Leadership Conf-Homan 107-5160-528.43-10 715.74
NW Leadership Conf-Craig 107-5160-528.43-10 715.74
NW Leadership Conf-O°Conn 107-5160-528.43-10 715.74
TCS/Geocomm GIS Training- 107-5160-528.43-11 64.32
E911 Public Ed tg-Homan 107-5160-528.43-11 375.04
CENTURYLINK 03-06 A/C 300539444 107-5160-528.43-11 54.92
03-06 A/C 406063845 107-5160-528.42-11 160.22
CENTURYLINK-QWEST 03-02 A/C 3602020380301 B 107-5160-528.42-11 938.47
QUALITY LOGO PRODUCTS AUTO &TRUCK ACCESSORIES 107-5160-528.31-61 808.71
US SANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Power adapter 107-5160-528.31-60 37.93
SYSTEM
Annual ACCIS Memberships- 107-5160-528.49-01 75.00
Annual ACCIS Memberships- 107-5160-528.49-01 (75.00)
Power adapter 107-5160-528.31-60 (37.93)
VOIANCE LANGUAGE SERVICES, MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 107-5160-528.42-11 4.50
LLC
WA STATE PATROL MANAGEMENT SERVICES 107-5160-528.48-10 1,500.00
WAPRO SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 107-5160-528.43-10 175.00
SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 107-5160-528.43-10 175.00
Pencom Division Total: $6,403.40
Pencom Department Total: $6,403.40
Pencom Fund Total: $6,340.73
HI-TECH ELECTRONICS INC EQUIP MAINT& REPAIR SERV 310-5950-594.65-10 787.53
EQUIP MAINT& REPAIR SERV 310-5950-594.65-10 787.53
EQUIP MAINT& REPAIR SERV 310-5950-594.65-10 787.53
Homeland Security Division Total: $2,362.59
Public Safety Projects Department Total: $2,362.59
ANGELES MILLWORK& LUMBER PAINTS,COATINGS,WALLPAPER 310-8985-594.65-10 96.48
SUPPLIES 310-8985-594.65-10 24.99
PAINTS,COATINGS,WALLPAPER 310-8985-594.65-10 187.56
SUPPLIES 310-8985-594.65-10 (9.84)
SUPPLIES 310-8985-594.65-10 284.39
HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES 310-8985-594.65-10 15.89
THURMAN SUPPLY ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 310-8985-594.65-10 74.47
ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 310-8985-594.65-10 35.03
Page 14 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 14
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
Misc Parks Projects Division Total: $708.97
Capital Proj-Parks& Rec Department Total: $708.97
Capital Improvement Fund Total: $3,071.56
ANIXTER, INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-0000-141.42-00 1,777.21
ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-0000-141.41-00 718.23
ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-0000-141.42-00 192.84
GENERAL PACIFIC INC ELECTRICAL CABLES &WIRES 401-0000-141.41-00 1,661.91
ISC UTILITY DEPOSIT REFUNDS FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 32.34
FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 97.70
FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 377.02
FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 468.61
OVERPAYMENT-1316 MORNING 401-0000-122.10-99 620.39
FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 21.43
FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 32.95
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Phone Cases 401-0000-237.00-00 (1.89)
SYSTEM
Phone Cases 401-0000-237.00-00 1.89
WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-0000-141.41-00 720.85
FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 401-0000-141.41-00 178.86
Division Total: $6,900.34
Department Total: $6,900.34
SOUND PUBLISHING INC ELEC ENG SPECIALIST AD 401-7111-533.44-10 147.06
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Electric Conf-Shere 401-7111-533.43-10 1,040.00
SYSTEM
Electric Conf-Shere 401-7111-533.43-10 (1,040.00)
Engineering-Electric Division Total: $147.06
BPA-POWER WIRES ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7120-533.33-10 1,441,002.00
Power Systems Division Total: $1,441,002.00
ALDERGROVE CONSTRUCTION INC ROADSIDE,GRNDS,REC, PARK 401-7180-533.48-10 1,479.66
ANGELES MILLWORK& LUMBER ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 7.99
ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 77.66
ANIXTER, INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 577.23
CED/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.31-20 205.96
ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01 203.79
ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 265.58
CERTIFIED HEARING INC AUDIOGRAM -T AMIOT 401-7180-533.49-90 25.00
COLUMBIA RURAL ELECTRIC SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 401-7180-533.41-50 1,826.50
Page 15 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 15
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
ASSN, INC
DIRECTV TELEVISION EQUIP &ACESS 401-7180-533.42-10 69.49
GENERAL PACIFIC INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 5,487.86
HOLMES ELECTRIC COMPANY JOB 63753 401-7180-533.34-02 8,500.00
JOS 63753 401-7180-533.34-02 8,500.00
INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPHE 401-7180-533.31-60 135.49
MATCO TOOLS ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01 347.10
OLYMPIC CONCRETE CUTTING ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.41-50 750.00
OLYMPIC LAUNDRY& DRY LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 401-7180-533.41-50 96.03
CLEANERS
LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 401-7180-533.41-50 96.03
OLYMPIC PARTY& CUSTODIAL OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.31-01 98.47
SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.31-01 126.59
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 401-7180-533.31-01 41.57
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 401-7180-533.31-01 126.52
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC SUPPLIES 401-7180-533.31-01 37.92
FURNITURE, OFFICE 401-7180-533.31-01 162.60
PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01 85.26
ROHLINGER ENTERPRISES INC TESTING&CALIBRATION SERVI 401-7180-533.48-10 43.36
ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01 51.12
TESTING&CALIBRATION SERVI 401-7180-533.48-10 396.74
TESTING&CALIBRATION SERVI 401-7180-533.48-10 598.37
SOUND PUBLISHING INC COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 401-7180-533.44-10 42.39
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 2.19
ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01 7.79
ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01 66.33
ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01 37.05
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.31-01 69.16
THURMAN SUPPLY ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 11.44
ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 12.23
TYNDALE COMPANY FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP/SUP 401-7180-533.31-01 (274.14)
FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP/SUP 401-7180-533.31-01 (81.79)
FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP/SUP 401-7180-533.31-01 186.45
FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP/SUP 401-7180-533.31-01 370.84
FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP/SUP 401-7180-533.31-01 290.94
Page 16 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 16
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Bridge Toll-Vehicle 1450 401-7180-533.49-90 7.00
SYSTEM
Phone Cases 401-7180-533.31-01 24.29
License fee-Vehicle 1650 401-7180-533.49-90 2.00
Registration fee-Vehicle 401-7180-533.49-90 47.25
Bridge Toll-Vehicle 1450 401-7180-533.49-90 (7.00)
License fee-Vehicle 1650 401-7180-533.49-90 (2.00)
Phone Cases 401-7180-533.31-01 (24.29)
Registration fee-Vehicle 401-7180-533.49-90 (47.25)
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 401-7180-533.49-90 20.02
CTR
WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP& SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 71.24
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CO FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 401-7180-533.31-01 209.00
Electric Operations Division Total: $31,461.03
Public Works-Electric Department Total: $1,472,610.09
Electric Utility Fund Total: $1,479,510.43
CENTURYLINK-QWEST 03-05 A/C 3604525230978B 402-7380-534.42-10 148.30
CH2M HILL INC CONSULTING SERVICES 402-7380-534.41-50 1,921.60
CONSULTING SERVICES 402-7380-534.41-50 14,190.40
COLUMBIA RURAL ELECTRIC SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 402-7380-534.43-10 182.60
ASSN, INC
DRY CREEK WATER ASSN, INC MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 402-7380-534.33-10 443.16
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 402-7380-534.33-10 778.66
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC PIPE FITTINGS 402-7380-534.31-20 761.21
GREEN RIVER COMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 402-7380-534.43-10 300.00
COLLEGE
HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES 402-7380-534.41-50 776.13
CONSULTANTS
CONSULTING SERVICES 402-7380-534.41-50 6,650.45
LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP PIPE AND TUBING 402-7380-534.31-20 59.84
MISC CITY CONSERVATION CITY REBATE 402-7380-534.49-90 50.00
REBATES
CITY REBATE 402-7380-534.49-90 100.00
PUD#1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 402-7380-534.47-10 33.32
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 402-7380-534.47-10 152.41
SPECTRA LABORATORIES-KITSAP TESTING&CALIBRATION SERVI 402-7380-534.41-50 215.00
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWER 402-7380-534.35-01 89.81
PUMPS&ACCESSORIES 402-7380-534.35-01 64.76
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWER 402-7380-534.31-01 64.97
Page 17 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 17
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 2017 PAT Renewal-J Groves 402-7380-534.49-01 42.00
SYSTEM
Refreshments-Safety Mtg 402-7380-534.31-01 25.07
2017 BAT Renewal- Becker 402-7380-534.49-01 77.00
Dewalt Lithium Batteries- 402-7380-534.35-01 621.90
2017 BAT Renewal- Becker 402-7380-534.49-01 (77.00)
2017 BAT Renewal-J Groves 402-7380-534.49-01 (42.00)
Dewalt Lithium Batteries- 402-7380-534.35-01 (621.90)
Refreshments-Safety Mtg 402-7380-534.31-01 (25.07)
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 402-7380-534.49-90 20.02
CTR
WA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 402-7380-534.43-10 51.00
HEALTH
EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 402-7380-534.43-10 51.00
Water Division Total: $27,104.64
Public Works-Water Department Total: $27,104.64
Water Utility Fund Total: $27,104.64
CLALLAM CNTY PUBLIC WORKS EUGA SEWER SYSTEM DEVELOP 403-0000-229.40-10 3,658.00
DEPT
THERMAL PIPE SYSTEMS, INC PIPE FITTINGS 403-0000-237.00-00 (70.40)
Division Total: $3,587.60
Department Total: $3,587.60
ADVANCED TRAVEL LSC Quarterly Training-Ha 403-7480-535.43-10 16.00
ALDERGROVE CONSTRUCTION INC ROADSIDE,GRNDS,REC, PARK 403-7480-535.48-10 1,479.66
CENTURYLINK-QWEST 03-14 A/C 3604574859247B 403-7480-535.42-10 98.73
03-14 A/C 3604575170121 B 403-7480-535.42-10 103.37
03-14 A/C 3604576315689B 403-7480-535.42-10 98.85
03-16 A/C 206T325585090B 403-7480-535.42-10 54.40
03-16 A/C 206T329544912B 403-7480-535.42-10 54.40
COLUMBIA RURAL ELECTRIC SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 403-7480-535.43-10 182.60
ASSN, INC
EDGE ANALYTICAL MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 403-7480-535.41-50 114.00
FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL CLOTHING ACCESSORIES(SEE 403-7480-535.31-01 715.68
FERRELLGAS INC FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 403-7480-535.32-12 26.02
GREEN RIVER COMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 403-7480-535.43-10 300.00
COLLEGE
HASA, INC CHEMICAL, COMMERCIAL,BULK 403-7480-535.31-05 5,218.77
INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPHE 403-7480-535.31-60 38.99
Page 18 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 18
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
LEGACY TELECOMMUNICATIONS, EQUIP MAINT& REPAIR SERV 403-7480-535.48-10 4,690.35
INC
MASCO PETROLEUM, INC FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 403-7480-535.32-11 973.13
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 403-7480-535.32-11 939.31
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 403-7480-535.32-11 698.96
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 403-7480-535.32-11 134.03
MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE DOT PHYSICAL REIMBURSEMNT 403-7480-535.49-90 150.00
REIMBURSEMENT
NAPA AUTO PARTS BELTS AND BELTING 403-7480-535.31-01 103.96
OFFICE DEPOT SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-01 61.92
OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-01 87.41
SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-01 14.37
SOUND PUBLISHING INC WWTP LAB TECH AD 403-7480-535.44-10 62.85
SUNSET DC7-IT BEST HARDWARE FLOOR MAINT MACHINE,PARTS 403-7480-535.35-01 146.33
PAINTING EQUIPMENT&ACC 403-7480-535.31-01 23.36
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC SHOES AND BOOTS 403-7480-535.31-01 150.00
SHOES AND BOOTS 403-7480-535.31-01 150.00
THERMAL PIPE SYSTEMS, INC PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.34-02 908.50
TYCO INTEGRATED SECURITY SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 403-7480-535.41-50 195.03
SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 403-7480-535.41-50 210.75
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Battery packs CSO flowmet 403-7480-535.31-20 699.00
SYSTEM
Battery packs CSO flowmet 403-7480-535.31-20 (699.00)
USA BLUEBOOK CHEMICAL LAB EQUIP&SUPP 403-7480-535.31-01 108.10
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 403-7480-535.49-90 20.02
CTR
Wastewater Division Total: $18,329.85
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: $18,329.85
Wastewater Utility Fund Total: $21,917.45
A/R MISCELLANEOUS REFUNDS RETROVILLE RENOVATION 404-0000-213.10-90 78.06
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Okidata Register Ribbon-T 404-0000-237.00-00 (3.00)
SYSTEM
Sortkwik finger moistners 404-0000-237.00-00 (1.01)
Okidata Register Ribbon-T 404-0000-237.00-00 3.00
Sortkwik finger moistners 404-0000-237.00-00 1.01
Division Total: $78.06
Department Total: $78.06
ALL WEATHER HEATING & ENVIRONMENTAL&ECOLOGICAL 404-7538-537.48-10 4,864.99
Page 19 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 19
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
COOLING
PEN PRINT INC COMMUNICATIONSWEDIA SERV 404-7538-537.44-10 37.94
SOUND PUBLISHING INC COMMUNICATIONSWEDIA SERV 404-7538-537.44-10 232.64
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Okidata Register Ribbon-T 404-7538-537.31-01 38.72
SYSTEM
Sortkwik finger moistners 404-7538-537.31-01 12.97
Okidata Register Ribbon-T 404-7538-537.31-01 (38.72)
Sortkwik finger moistners 404-7538-537.31-01 (12.97)
WASTE CONNECTIONS, INC BLDG CONSTRUC. SERVICES- 404-7538-537.41-51 244,921.16
ENVIRONMENTAL&ECOLOGICAL 404-7538-537.41-51 1,318.85
ENVIRONMENTAL&ECOLOGICAL 404-7538-537.45-30 5,367.28
ENVIRONMENTAL&ECOLOGICAL 404-7538-582.75-10 35,025.41
ENVIRONMENTAL&ECOLOGICAL 404-7538-592.83-10 27,753.31
SW-Transfer Station Division Total: $319,521.58
COLUMBIA RURAL ELECTRIC SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 404-7580-537.43-10 182.60
ASSN, INC
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC SUPPLIES 404-7580-537.31-01 157.19
SWANA EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 404-7580-537.43-10 450.00
WASTE CONNECTIONS, INC ENVIRONMENTAL&ECOLOGICAL 404-7580-537.41-51 49,875.42
Solid Waste-Collections Division Total: $50,665.21
ASPECT CONSULTING, LLC CONSULTING SERVICES 404-7585-537.41-50 4,842.32
STEUBER DISTRIBUTING INC NURSERY STOCK&SUPPLIES 404-7585-537.31-20 125.90
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE ROADSIDE,GRNDS,REC, PARK 404-7585-537.31-20 31.21
AGRICULTURAL CROPS&GRAINS 404-7585-537.31-20 16.09
Solid Waste-Landfill Division Total: $5,015.52
Public Works-Solid Waste Department Total: $375,202.31
Solid Waste Utility Fund Total: $375,280.37
ADVANCED TRAVEL Stormwater Outreach Mtg-B 406-7412-538.43-10 62.35
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE FERTILIZERS& SOIL CONDTN 406-7412-538.31-20 23.40
FERTILIZERS& SOIL CONDTN 406-7412-538.31-20 23.40
HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWER 406-7412-538.35-01 60.47
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 406-7412-538.31-01 116.29
SHOES AND BOOTS 406-7412-538.31-01 150.00
FERTILIZERS& SOIL CONDTN 406-7412-538.31-20 37.91
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 406-7412-538.49-90 20.02
CTR
Page 20 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 20
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
Stormwater Division Total: $493.84
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: $493.84
Stormwater Utility Fund Total: $493.84
A/R MISCELLANEOUS REFUNDS MEDIC 1 OVERPAYMENT 409-0000-213.10-90 18.54
MEDIC 1 OVERPAYMENT 409-0000-213.10-90 19.12
Division Total: $37.66
Department Total: $37.66
BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 409-6025-526.31-13 12.37
SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 409-6025-526.31-02 55.93
SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 409-6025-526.31-13 82.02
LIFE ASSIST SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 409-6025-526.31-13 1,093.53
SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 409-6025-526.31-02 560.94
SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 409-6025-526.31-13 111.02
SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 409-6025-526.31-13 193.32
MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE BIEKER- UNIFORM ALLOWANC 409-6025-526.20-80 49.30
REIMBURSEMENT
MOROZ, JAMES FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 409-6025-526.31-08 200.00
FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 409-6025-526.31-08 200.00
FIRST AID& SAFETY EQUIP. 409-6025-526.31-08 200.00
OLYMPIC OXYGEN SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 409-6025-526.31-13 33.82
SEAWESTERN INC SHOES AND BOOTS 409-6025-526.20-80 421.51
SUNSET DO-IT BEST HARDWARE Clothing/Apparel 409-6025-526.20-80 (27.09)
Clothing/Apparel 409-6025-526.20-80 24.38
HARDWARE,AND ALLIED ITEMS 409-6025-526.20-80 24.38
SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC CLOTHING &APPAREL 409-6025-526.20-80 75.88
SYSTEMS DESIGN WEST, LLC CONSULTING SERVICES 409-6025-526.41-50 2,540.81
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT McFarland Xray-Collection 409-6025-526.41-50 134.93
SYSTEM
McFarland Xray-Collection 409-6025-526.41-50 (134.93)
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 409-6025-526.31-02 73.12
Medic I Division Total: $5,925.24
Fire Department Total: $5,925.24
Medic I Utility Fund Total: $5,962.90
INTEGRAL CONSULTING, INC CONSULTING SERVICES 413-7481-535.41-50 79,225.69
PORT OF PORT ANGELES ENGINEERING SERVICES 413-7481-535.41-50 74,623.04
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Lodging-Bloor/West/D McKe 413-7481-535.43-10 565.29
Page 21 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 21
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
SYSTEM Lodging-Bloor/West/D McKe 413-7481-535.43-10 (565.29)
Wastewater Remediation Division Total: $153,848.73
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: $153,848.73
Harbor Clean Up Fund Total: $153,848.73
ALL WEATHER HEATING & CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 1,000.00
COOLING
ALPHA BUILDER CORPORATION CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 2,354.00
ANGELES HEATING, INC CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 800.00
CLALLAM TRANSIT SYSTEM CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 11,772.16
CLEARESULT CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 4,580.21
DAVE'S HEATING& COOLING SVC CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 800.00
CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 800.00
CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 3,600.00
EVERWARM HEARTH & HOME INC CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 408.00
GLASS SERVICES CO INC CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 1,084.50
MISC CITY CONSERVATION CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 4,900.00
REBATES
PENINSULA HEAT INC CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 800.00
CITY REBATE 421-7121-533.49-86 3,792.92
RADIO PACIFIC INC (KONP) COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 421-7121-533.44-10 625.00
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Conf Registration-Currie 421-7121-533.43-10 700.00
SYSTEM
Service fee 421-7121-533.43-10 12.99
Semi nar-Kajfasz 421-7121-533.43-10 645.00
Conf Registration-Currie 421-7121-533.43-10 (700.00)
Semi nar-Kajfasz 421-7121-533.43-10 (645.00)
Service fee 421-7121-533.43-10 (12.99)
Conservation Division Total: $37,316.79
Public Works-Electric Department Total: $37,316.79
Conservation Fund Total: $37,316.79
CHRISTENSON ELECTRIC INC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,TRA 451-7188-594.65-10 129,997.01
Electric Projects Division Total: $129,997.01
Public Works-Electric Department Total: $129,997.01
Electric Utility CIP Fund Total: $129,997.01
KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS CONSULTING SERVICES 453-7488-594.65-10 8,341.50
CONSULTING SERVICES 453-7488-594.65-10 33,377.05
Page 22 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 22
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
Wastewater Projects Division Total: $41,718.55
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: $41,718.55
Wastewater Utility CIP Fund Total: $41,718.55
SOELLING, CHRISTOPHER J. PLLC CONSULTING SERVICES 463-7489-594.65-10 3,382.50
US SANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Lodging-Sender 463-7489-594.65-10 118.95
SYSTEM
Lodging-Bender/Fulton 463-7489-594.65-10 240.44
Lodging-Bloor 463-7489-594.65-10 118.95
Lodging-Bloor 463-7489-594.65-10 118.95
Lodging-Fulton 463-7489-594.65-10 120.22
Dinner-Fulton/Bender 463-7489-594.65-10 49.54
t=erry-Fulton/Bloor/Bender 463-7489-594.65-10 45.60
Breakfast-Fulton/Bender/B 463-7489-594.65-10 29.39
Parking-Bloor 463-7489-594.65-10 19.73
Parking-CSCE Phase 2 Media 463-7489-594.65-10 28.00
Breakfast-Fulton/Bender/B 463-7489-594.65-10 63.10
Breakfast-Fulton/Bender/B 463-7489-594.65-10 (63.10)
Breakfast-Fulton/Bender/B 463-7489-594.65-10 (29.39)
Dinner-Fulton/Bender 463-7489-594.65-10 (49.54)
t=erry-Fulton/Bloor/Bender 463-7489-594.65-10 (45.60)
Lodging-Sender 463-7489-594.65-10 (118.95)
Lodging-Bender/Fulton 463-7489-594.65-10 (240.44)
Lodging-Bloor 463-7489-594.65-10 (118.95)
Lodging-Bloor 463-7489-594.65-10 (118.95)
Lodging-Fulton 463-7489-594.65-10 (120.22)
Parking-Bloor 463-7489-594.65-10 (19.73)
Parking-CSO Phase 2 Media 463-7489-594.65-10 (28.00)
VANIR CONSTRUCTION MGMT, INC CONSULTING SERVICES 463-7489-594.41-50 19,065.23
CSO Capital Division Total: $22,447.73
Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: $22,447.73
CSO Capital Fund Total: $22,447.73
ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 501-0000-141.20-00 3,914.49
PRODUCTS, INC
1 UEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 501-0000-141.20-00 5,016.92
AUTOZONE STORES, INC AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 274.95
BAXTER AUTO PARTS#15 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 51.97
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 57.57
Page 23 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 23
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
BAXTER AUTO PARTS#15 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 77.97
BRAUN NORTHWEST AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 337.47
DON SMALL &SONS OIL DIST CO. AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 1,906.65
FREIGHTLINER NORTHWEST AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 157.16
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 (41.02)
GCR TIRES& SERVICE AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 846.84
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 1,013.43
MASCO PETROLEUM, INC AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 125.20
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-237.00-00 (21.50)
NAPA AUTO PARTS AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 34.34
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 98.22
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 (3.82)
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 38.10
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 169.90
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 169.98
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 66.13
PENINSULA LUBRICANTS AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 101.65
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 1,054.89
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 1,078.29
QUALITY 4X4 TRUCK SUPPLY AUTO &TRUCK ACCESSORIES 501-0000-141.40-00 81.30
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 150.31
SIRENNET.COM AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 250.74
SIX ROBBLEES° INC AUTO &TRUCK ACCESSORIES 501-0000-141.40-00 55.83
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Motor Repair Kit 501-0000-237.00-00 (2.91)
SYSTEM
Motor Repair Kit 501-0000-237.00-00 2.91
WESTERN PETERBILT INC AUTO &TRUCK ACCESSORIES 501-0000-141.40-00 84.32
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 78.89
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 99.78
Division Total: $17,326.95
Department Total: $17,326.95
AMERICAN PETROLEUM ENV SVCS AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.31-01 50.00
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.31-01 65.04
ANGELES COLLISION REPAIR AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 39.02
ANGELES MACHINE WORKS INC EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 182.11
METALS,BARS,PLATES,RODS 501-7630-548.34-02 50.86
Page 24 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 24
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
ARAARK Laundry/Cleaning 501-7630-548.49-90 (48.75)
LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 501-7630-548.49-90 87.11
ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 501-7630-548.32-13 118.58
PRODUCTS, INC
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 501-7630-548.32-13 15.53
FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 501-7630-548.32-13 118.51
AUTOZONE STORES, INC AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 150.23
BELTS AND BELTING 501-7630-548.34-02 27.57
BAXTER AUTO PARTS#15 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.31-01 23.96
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 236.83
BELTS AND BELTING 501-7630-548.34-02 19.79
COLUMBIA RURAL ELECTRIC SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 501-7630-548.43-10 182.60
ASSN, INC
EVERGREEN TOWING EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 124.12
FAR-WEST MACHINE& AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 102.33
HYDRAULICS
HEARTLINE AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 97.51
INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPHE 501-7630-548.31-01 49.85
LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 1,533.82
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 1,600.61
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 106.35
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 106.36
MATCO TOOLS AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 53.55
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 84.00
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 90.32
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.31-01 248.19
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.31-01 277.35
NAPA AUTO PARTS AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 114.86
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 298.10
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 132.63
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 4.14
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 76.00
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 21.85
BELTS AND BELTING 501-7630-548.34-02 50.54
PAPE' MACHINERY AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 37.33
PDQ AUTO, INC. AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 324.14
Page 25 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 25
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
PDQ AUTO, INC. EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 292.68
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 935.47
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 1,887.79
PENINSULA LUBRICANTS AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 40.26
PORT ANGELES TIRE FACTORY AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 186.06
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 958.04
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 110.19
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 165.85
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 (631.81)
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 631.81
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 18.37
PRICE FORD LINCOLN AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 441.39
R&S TRANSPORT, INC EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 216.80
RUDY°S AUTOMOTIVE AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 201.71
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 376.12
STEVE'S MUFFLER SHOP AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 456.06
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 487.80
SUNSET DC7-IT BEST HARDWARE AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 1.75
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2.83
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 11.80
TACOMA DODGE CHRYSLER JEEP AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 583.07
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 328.80
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 2,053.25
EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 838.38
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Motor Repair Kit 501-7630-548.34-02 37.47
SYSTEM
Cordless Telephone 501-7630-548.31-01 134.01
Cordless Telephone 501-7630-548.31-01 (134.01)
Motor Repair Kit 501-7630-548.34-02 (37.47)
WESTERN PETERBILT INC EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 217.60
AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 58.93
WESTERN STEEL METALS,BARS,PLATES,RODS 501-7630-548.34-02 108.75
Equipment Services Division Total: $17,832.69
Public Works-Equip Svcs Department Total: $17,832.69
Equipment Services Fund Total: $35,159.64
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Barricade Router 502-0000-237.00-00 (2.28)
Page 26 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 26
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
SYSTEM Barricade Router 502-0000-237.00-00 2.28
Division Total: $0.00
Department Total: $0.00
CANON USA, INC OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 108.66
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 116.84
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 124.85
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 138.86
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 162.22
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 180.55
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 180.55
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 181.84
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 195.83
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 195.83
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 226.64
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 244.97
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 275.64
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 292.74
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 310.95
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 395.44
OFFICE MACHINES &ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 663.41
CDW GOVERNMENT INC COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPHE 502-2081-518.48-10 2,158.19
COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPHE 502-2081-518.48-10 2,484.37
CENTURYLINK-QWEST 03-05 A/C 36045222451455 502-2081-518.42-10 48.48
03-05 A/C 36045237125855 502-2081-518.42-10 74.72
03-05 A/C 36045238778175 502-2081-518.42-10 48.30
03-05 A/C 36045245874795 502-2081-518.42-10 118.29
03-05 A/C 36045251096235 502-2081-518.42-10 48.30
03-05 A/C 36045258342115 502-2081-518.42-10 47.96
03-05 A/C 36045281005325 502-2081-518.42-10 51.83
03-05 A/C 36045298828115 502-2081-518.42-10 48.17
03-05 A/C 36045298876525 502-2081-518.42-10 49.44
03-05 A/C 36045299118345 502-2081-518.42-10 98.85
03-10 A/C 36021002409555 502-2081-518.42-10 178.50
03-14 A/C 36045704111995 502-2081-518.42-10 752.93
03-14 A/C 36045708315585 502-2081-518.42-10 48.30
Page 27 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 27
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
CENTURYLINK-QWEST 03-14 A/C 36045709683435 502-2081-518.42-10 98.85
03-14 A/C 36045712709755 502-2081-518.42-10 221.33
03-14 A/C 36045715355715 502-2081-518.42-10 74.72
03-14 A/C 36045735320265 502-2081-518.42-10 59.55
03-14 A/C 36045766840855 502-2081-518.42-10 536.98
03-16 A/C 20673557247685 502-2081-518.42-10 57.46
COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 502-2081-518.42-10 488.34
INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPHE 502-2081-518.31-60 85.63
COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPHE 502-2081-518.31-60 106.99
MALWAREBYTES CORPORATION DATA PROC SERV&SOFTWARE 502-2081-518.48-10 3,866.63
NORDISK SYSTEMS, INC COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPP 502-2081-518.48-10 616.35
PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 502-2081-518.31-01 101.26
OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 502-2081-518.31-01 59.08
PSIC ANNUAL ENV/SEC/FIRE MOND 502-2081-518.41-50 411.92
US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Shuttle service to Laserf 502-2081-518.43-10 32.00
SYSTEM
Air Compressor accessorie 502-2081-518.31-60 68.51
Airfare-Strait 502-2081-518.43-10 227.20
Airfare-Strait 502-2081-518.43-10 237.95
Parking-Strait/Kheriaty 502-2081-518.43-10 44.27
Lodging Reservation-Strai 502-2081-518.43-10 217.82
Barricade Router 502-2081-518.31-60 29.37
Air Compressor accessorie 502-2081-518.31-60 (68.51)
Airfare-Strait 502-2081-518.43-10 (237.95)
Airfare-Strait 502-2081-518.43-10 (227.20)
Barricade Router 502-2081-518.31-60 (29.37)
Lodging Reservation-Strai 502-2081-518.43-10 (217.82)
Parking-Strait/Kheriaty 502-2081-518.43-10 (44.27)
Shuttle service to Laserf 502-2081-518.43-10 (32.00)
Information Technologies Division Total: $17,037.54
NORDISK SYSTEMS, INC FURNITURE, OFFICE 502-2082-594.65-10 1,421.58
SHIPPING AND HANDLING 502-2082-594.65-10 344.62
PRESIDIO NETWORKED COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPHE 502-2082-594.65-10 4,669.33
SOLUTIONS
COMPUTERS,DP &WORD PROC. 502-2082-594.65-10 2,944.72
DATA PROC SERV&SOFTWARE 502-2082-594.65-10 328.50
IT Capital Projects Division Total: $9,708.75
Page 28 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 28
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
PUD#1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY Power Supplies 502-2083-518.47-10 42.44
Wireless Mesh Division Total: $42.44
Finance Department Total: $26,788.73
Information Technology Fund Total: $26,788.73
AWC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST L1 Med/Vis Premiums 503-1631-517.46-34 6,231.66
Life Insurance 503-1631-517.46-32 1,696.42
LTD 503-1631-517.46-31 4,663.94
Med/Den/Vis Premiums 503-1631-517.46-30 230,844.82
NW ADMIN TRANSFER ACCT CONSULTING SERVICES 503-1631-517.46-33 84,209.50
CONSULTING SERVICES 503-1631-517.46-34 5,763.60
Other Insurance Programs Division Total: $333,409.94
WASHINGTON HOSPITAL SVCS CONSULTING SERVICES 503-1661-517.41-40 2,400.00
CONSULTING SERVICES 503-1661-517.41-40 2,400.00
Worker's Compensation Division Total: $4,800.00
Self Insurance Department Total: $338,209.94
Self-Insurance Fund Total: $338,209.94
AWC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST Retiree Premiums 602-6221-517.46-35 2,428.92
Fireman's Pension Division Total: $2,428.92
Fireman's Pension Department Total: $2,428.92
Firemen's Pension Fund Total: $2,428.92
AFLAC AFLAC SUPPLEMENTAL INSURA 920-0000-231.53-10 2,074.30
AFLAC SUPPLEMENTAL INSURA 920-0000-231.53-10 2,074.30
AFLAC SUPPLEMENTAL INSURA 920-0000-231.53-10 2,211.82
PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.53-11 192.31
PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.53-12 1,513.66
AWC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST Feb/March Premiums 920-0000-231.53-10 824.20
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE Case#14-14948 920-0000-231.56-90 794.00
EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.55-30 485.00
EMPOWER-P/R WIRE PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.52-20 20,377.07
FEDERAL PAYROLL TAX PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.50-10 75,598.25
P/R Deductions pe 02-12 920-0000-231.50-10 33.18
FICA/MEDICARE PAYROLL TAX PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.50-20 100.50
PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.50-20 76,751.29
GUARANTEED EDUCATION PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.56-95 122.00
TUITION
Page 29 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 29
m� City of Port Angeles
City Council Expenditure Report
Between Mar 11, 2017 and Mar 24, 2017
Vendor Description Account Number Amount
NSA BANK IBEW Health Svgs Acct 920-0000-231.52-40 1,243.00
IC A-P/R WIRES PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.52-10 19,490.08
LEOFF PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.51-21 26,366.67
OFFICE OF SUPPORT PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.56-20 276.92
ENFORCEMENT
PERS PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.51-10 1,536.79
PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.51-11 13,620.57
PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.51-12 113.64
PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.51-12 63,155.17
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 589 PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.54-10 2,026.66
PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.54-10 1,916.50
UNITED WAY(PAYROLL) PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.56-10 547.50
WSCFF/EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.53-20 1,575.00
TRUST
Division Total: $315,020.38
Department Total: $315,020.38
Payroll Clearing Fund Total: $315,020.38
Total for Checks Dated Between Mar 11,2017 and Mar 24,2017 $3,251,111.25
Page 30 of 30 Mar 29, 2017 9:18:03 AM
04/04/2017 E - 30
NGELES
W A S H I N G T 0 N, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 4, 2017
To: City Council
FROM: CRAIG FULTON,P.E.,DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS&UTILITIES
SUBJECT: Overhead Reconductoring, Project CL06-2016, Final Acceptance
Summary: Christenson Electric Inc., has completed the contract to replace 46 copper overhead
distribution conductor with 42 ACSR in the First/Front Alley between Alder Street and Washington
Street, and on N Street between 15th and 18th Streets.
Funding: Funding for this project was identified in the 2016 Electric Utility capital budget in the
total amount of$200,000 for construction.
Recommendation: Accept the Overhead Reconductoring project as complete by Christenson Electric
Inc., and authorize release of the retainage in the amount of$7,096.17 upon receipt of required
clearances.
Back2round/Analysis: Christenson Electric Inc., of Portland, OR, was the lowest bidder to replace
46 copper overhead distribution conductor with 42 ACSR in the First/Front Alley between Alder
Street and Washington Street, and on N Street between 15th and 18th Streets. The replaced conductors
were over 40 years old and had become brittle with age and corrosion. The work has been inspected
and the final payment request has been received from the Contractor.
Funding Overview: The bid award price for the contract was $ 177,5 8 8.13. The work was
completed at $153,845.00 including sales tax. The original cost had been estimated at $200,000.00,
and was included in the 2016 CFP budget for the Electric Utility. The contract was authorized by
Council on November 15, 2016.
N:\CC0UNClL\FlNAL\0verhead Reconductoring Project CL06-2016,Final Acceptance.docx
04/04/2017 E - 31
"MORT ,", NGELES
A,
...............
� ' -- WASH I N GTO N, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 4, 2017
To: City Council
FROM: CRAIG FULTON,P.E.,DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS&UTILITIES
SUBJECT: Material Purchase: Area/Yard Light Purchase, CL02-2012 Contract MEC-
2017-04
Summary: Bids were received on March 23, 2017 for the purchase of 300 LED Area/Yard Light
fixtures, 30 Light Trespass Shields, and a Remote Control Device for the Light Operations Division.
Funding: Funding for this project was identified in the 2017 Electric Utility capital budget in the
total amount of$93,000.00
Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign a contract with Anixter Inc., of
Portland, Oregon, for the purchase of 300 LED Area/Yard Light fixtures, 30 Light Trespass Shields,
and a Remote Control Device manufactured by Evluma, at a price of$79,557.47, including sales
tax.
Background/Analysis: Bids were received on March 23, 2017, for 300 LED Area/Yard Light
fixtures, 30 Light Trespass Shields and a Remote Control Device to replace old, inefficient High
Pressure Sodium (HPS) lights being removed from service at the end of their life.
The LED fixtures cost less than half of the equivalent HPS fixtures and have a built-in failsafe in
case the photo-eye (light sensor) fails. The `failsafe' is a dawn/dusk calendar specific to Port
Angeles. The light will turn itself on and off according to this calendar in case of light sensor
failure.
The provided remote control device will facilitate ease of switching the light service ON or OFF at
the customer's request. The current method of switching service ON or OFF is labor intensive, as it
requires a service bucket truck roll to the fixture location where the Light Operations serviceman
physically disconnects the service on the pole. This remote control will allow substantial savings in
operational costs. The remote control device will also allow the City to adjust the intensity of the
LED lighting from 20% to 100%which will allow each light's intensity to be adjusted for a
particular situation.
N:ACCOUNCIL\FINAL\Material Purchase-Yard(Area)Light Replacement,Contract MEC17-04,Project CL0212.docx
04/04/2017 E - 32
April 4,2017 City Council
Re: Yard(Area)Light Replacement,Contract MEC17-04,Project CL0212
Page 2
Fixtures, Shields, and Remote Control device are to be delivered within 120 days of purchase order
receipt.
Funding Overview: Bids were advertised in the Peninsula Daily News. Three bids were received.
Alternate Bid
Amount (Coastal
Vendor Bid Amount Version
Anixter Inc, Portland, OR $ 79,557.47 $ 91,996.37
CED, Port Angeles, WA $ 84,457.78 $ 88,107.52
Henden Electric Inc, Kingston, WA $ 109,082.92
Government Estimate $ 77,000.00
Anixter Inc., of Portland, Oregon, is the lowest bidder and has had a satisfactory supply record with
Light Operations Division in the past. The total cost is approximately 3% over the $77,000
estimated price, but under the budgeted $93,000 amount in 2017 Electric Utility capital plan. This
project is eligible for BPA Energy Efficiency rebate.
04/04/2017 E - 33
NGEL
RT ,,,
• 1?Q
'
�lll�ff�J�lll1�/ry��
,�- W AS H I N G T O N, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 4, 2017
To: City Council
FROM: CRAIG FULTON,P.E.,DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS&UTILITIES
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Second Reading - Transportation Benefit District Ordinance
Summary: Demands for increased public safety, and park and recreation services preclude the ability
of the General Fund to increase its support for proper maintenance and repair of City streets.
Washington State law(RCW 35.21.225 and RCW 36.73.010) authorizes cities to establish a
Transportation Benefit District(TBD). The TBD is a special purpose district that allows the collection
of new funding earmarked specifically for street maintenance and repair. Council directed staff to
develop and bring to Council an ordinance establishing a Transportation Benefit District.
Funding Overview: If approved by voters on the August 1 ballot, establish a 0.2% sales tax to
commence January 1, 2018, as part of the Transportation Benefit District.
Recommendation: 1) Continue the Public Hearing, 2) Conduct the Second reading of the
ordinance establishing the Transportation Benefit District, 3) Close the Public Hearing and
adopt the Ordinance establishing a Transportation Benefit District
Background/Analysis: The General Fund has reached a financial position where it can no longer
support the proper maintenance and repair of City streets through substantial capital repair projects. As
a General Fund expense, the Street Fund must compete against Police, Fire, and Parks & Recreation for
yearly financing, both for operations and capital projects. Though the priority setting process has rated
street maintenance as a high priority, financial reality dictates that it will never receive proper funding
for the most minimum required maintenance and repair.
The City has approximately 120 miles of road and 40 miles of alleys. Currently, the City's street
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is rated as a 43, on a 0-100 scale (zero being a failed street and 100
being newly paved). A PCI of 43 is considered "Poor" condition. The City's alleys are rated with a
PCI of 5, which is considered "Very Poor." At current funding levels, there is no street restoration
program to begin improving street conditions, or even minimally slowing street degradation. The
Street Fund is currently funded at a level which only makes spot repairs to "failed" sections of road.
There is no sustainable street maintenance solution without a TBD.
The TBD is an independent taxing district created for the sole purpose to provide and fund
transportation improvements in the district. The establishment of a TBD will create a restricted source
04/04/2017 F - 1
April 4,2017 City Council
Re: Transportation Benefit District
Page 2
of funds specifically designated for street maintenance and repair. Though a TBD alone will not
generate enough money to fully fund the Street program, a TBD can augment the limited funds
provided by the General Fund to allow increased road preventive maintenance and limited road
restoration.
While there are numerous funding mechanisms allowed by the State of Washington in a TBD, the Port
Angeles City Council requested staff develop a plan and timeline for bringing a 0.2% TBD sales tax to
the voters on an upcoming ballot(2 cents for every $10). A sales tax would ensure that all users of
City streets contribute to their maintenance, including tourists, and all County residents who shop in
Port Angeles. The other alternative is a$20 car tab which would restrict financial TBD contributions
only to City residents. The earliest ballot would be August 1, 2017.
The procedure to establish and fund a TBD flows in several distinct steps. First the Council establishes
the TBD. To do this the Council must first hold a public hearing to take input on the formation of the
TBD. Then, if the Council decides to move ahead with the TBD, the Council establishes the district by
an ordinance. Normally, the City Council is designated as the governing board of the district. After the
district is established then the governing board of the district, the council, determines a funding
method. In the event that the Council elects a funding method that must be approved by the voters, the
Council then passes a resolution placing the question on an election ballot. The timeline to reach this
ballot is as follows:
9 MAR 2017 -Publish a Notice of Public Hearing
21 MAR 2017 - First reading of TBD ordinance and open public hearing
04 APR 2017 - Second reading of TBD ordinance; continue and close public hearing; Council
adopts ordinance
18 APR 2017 - Council (acting as Board of TBD)passes Resolution establishing a TBD ballot
measure for 0.2% sales tax
12 May 2017 - Filing Deadline
1 Aug 2017 - Ballot measure on Primary election
15 Aug 2017 - Election is certified
17 Oct 2017 - Deadline to provide notice to Department of Revenue
1 Jan 2018 - State commences 0.2% sales tax collection (if voter approved)
To meet the above timelines and milestones, the ordinance establishing the Transportation Benefit
District has been prepared and is provided based on Council guidance.
PUBLIC COMMENT: Only one Public Comment(email)has been received by City staff regarding the
subject, which has been forwarded to Council members. The email expressed concern over the
degradation of city streets and alleys over the last 45 years.
Attachment:
Transportation Benefit District Ordinance
04/04/2017 F - 2
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, enacting
a new Chapter 11.20 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code "Port
Angeles Transportation Benefit District"; establishing a
Transportation Benefit District; and fixing a time when the same
shall become effective.
WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Port Angeles has the responsibility under
the Constitution of the State of Washington for the improvement, maintenance, protection and
operation of public ways within the corporate limits of the City pursuant to RCW 35A.11.020
and Chapter 35A.47 RCW; and
WHEREAS,the improvement,maintenance,protection and operation of public ways
requires preserving existing transportation improvements to avoid both catastrophic failure of the
improvements which would require significant additional funds to reconstruct, as well as their
gradual deterioration; and
WHEREAS, the number one priority in the "Washington Transportation Plan for
2007-2026" adopted by the Washington Transportation Commission ("State Transportation
Plan") is to preserve and extend prior investments in existing transportation facilities and the
services they provide to people and commerce; and
WHEREAS, the State Transportation Plan identifies in Section 11 that there is no
more fundamental transportation investment than existing system preservation -keeping the
physical infrastructure in safe and efficient operating condition; and
WHEREAS, the City has limited transportation funding to pay for necessary
transportation preservation and maintenance; and
WHEREAS,the funding dedicated for the preservation and maintenance of the City's
transportation infrastructure has been dramatically reduced due to significant loss of Motor
1
04/04/2017 F - 3
TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT –KEY POINTS
Council has made “city infrastructure” a priority during priority setting process
Most frequent complaint from residents is poor street and alley conditions
Status Quo funding for street infrastructure maintenance is not a solution
This Ordinance does not establish a funding mechanism, only the framework
Funding mechanism to be established once TBD is approved
Vehicle Excise Taxes; and
WHEREAS, the City of Port Angeles annually adopts a 6 year Transportation
Program pursuant to State Law and has or will adopt an updated Transportation Capitol Facilities
Plan which identifies necessary improvements to the City's transportation systems; and
WHEREAS, while dedicated revenues have decreased, the ongoing annual costs to
preserve and maintain the City's transportation infrastructure continue to rise leaving the City
unable to continue to adequately preserve and maintain the City's transportation infrastructure;
and
WHEREAS, Chapter 36.73 RCW provides for the establishment of transportation
benefit districts and for the levying of additional revenue sources for transportation improvements
within the District that are consistent with existing state, regional, and local transportation plans
and necessitated by existing or reasonable foreseeable congestion levels; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.21.225 authorizes the City Council to establish a
transportation benefit district subject to the provisions of Chapter 36.73 RCW; and
WHEREAS,the City desires to form a Transportation Benefit District which includes
the entire City of Port Angeles corporate limits as they currently exist or as they may exist
following future annexations; and
WHEREAS, on March 21, 2017, the City conducted a public hearing in accordance
with RCW 36.73.050, after giving proper notice describing the Transportation Benefit District
projects consistent with Chapter 36.73 RCW; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Port Angeles finds it to be in the best
interests of the City to establish a citywide Transportation Benefit District for the preservation
and maintenance of the City's transportation infrastructure consistent with Chapter 36.73 RCW,
2
04/04/2017 F - 4
to protect the City's long-term investments in that infrastructure, to reduce the risk of
transportation facility failure, to improve safety, to continue optimal performance of the
infrastructure over time, and to avoid more expensive infrastructure replacements in the future;
and
WHEREAS, the members of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles shall be
the governing body for the Transportation Benefit District acting in an ex officio and independent
capacity.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES,
WASHINGTON DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 -Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish a Transportation
Benefit District pursuant to RCW 35.21.225 and Chapter 36.73 RCW.
Section 2 - Findings. The City Council finds it is in the public interest to provide
adequate levels of funding for the purposes of ongoing transportation improvements that
preserve, maintain and as appropriate, construct or reconstruct the transportation infrastructure
of the City of Port Angeles, consistent with Chapter 36.73 RCW.
Section 3 -Creation of New City Code Chapter Establishing a Transportation
Benefit District. The City Council of the City of Port Angeles hereby adopts a new Chapter
11.20 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code entitled "Port Angeles Transportation Benefit
District," which shall read as follows:
CHAPTER 11.20 —PORT ANGELES TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT
11.20.010—Establishment of Transportation Benefit District.
11.20.020—Governing Board.
11.20.030—Authority of the District.
11.20.040—Transportation Improvements Funded.
11.20.050—Dissolution of District.
3
04/04/2017 F - 5
11.20.060—Liberal Construction.
11.20.010 Establishment of Transportation Benefit District.
There is created a transportation benefit district to be known as the Port Angeles Transportation
Benefit District or"District" with geographical boundaries comprised of the corporate limits of
the City as they currently exist or as they may exist following future annexations.
11.20.020 Governing Board.
A. The governing board 'Board" of the transportation benefit district shall be the members
of the Port Angeles City Council acting in an ex officio and independent capacity, which shall
have the authority to exercise the statutory powers set forth in Chapter 36.73 RCW.
B. The treasurer of the transportation benefit district shall be the City Chief Financial
Officer. And,the City Clerk shall serve as the clerk of the governing board of the transportation
benefit district.
C. The Board shall develop a material change policy to address major plan changes that
affect project delivery or the ability to finance the plan, pursuant to the requirements set forth
in RCW 36.73.160(l).
C. Meetings of the Board shall be governed by the procedural rules applicable to meetings
of the City Council, as these rules may be amended by the City Council from time to time.
Board actions shall be taken in the same manner and follow the same procedure as for the
adoption of City Council resolutions. Meetings of the Board shall, whenever possible, take
place on the same dates scheduled for City Council meetings.
D. The Board shall issue an annual report, pursuant to the requirements of RCW
36.73.160(2).
11.20.030 Authority of the District.
The Board shall have and exercise all powers and functions provided by Chapter 36.73 to fulfill
the functions of the District, including without limitation the power to request voter approval
of, and thereafter impose and collect, a sales and use tax in accordance with RCW 82.14.0455.
11.20.040 Transportation Improvements Funded.
The funds generated by the transportation benefit district shall be used for transportation
improvements that preserve, maintain and operate the existing transportation infrastructure of
the City, consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.73 RCW. The funds may be utilized
for any lawful purpose under the Chapter; but all funds raised through the TBD shall be
expended only for such preservation, maintenance and operation in accordance with the
4
04/04/2017 F - 6
provisions of Chapter 36.73 RCW as the same exists or is hereafter amended. The funds
expended by the District shall preserve, maintain and operate the City's previous investments
in the transportation infrastructure, reduce the risk of transportation facility failure, improve
safety, continue the cost-effectiveness of the City's infrastructure investments, and continue the
optimal performance of the transportation system. Additional transportation improvement
projects may be funded only after compliance with the provisions of RCW 36.73.050(2)(b)
following notice,public hearing and enactment of an authorizing ordinance.
11.20.050 Dissolution of District.
The transportation benefit district shall be automatically dissolved when all indebtedness of the
District has been retired and when all of the District's anticipated responsibilities have been
satisfied. Street preservation, maintenance and operation are ongoing, long term obligations of
the City.
11.20.060 Liberal Construction.
As authorized pursuant to RCW 36.73, this chapter shall be liberally constructed to permit the
accomplishment of its purposes.
Section 4 -Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance
are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited
to, the correction of the scrivener's/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering,
section/subsection numbers and any references thereto.
Section 5- Severability. If any provisions of this Ordinance,or its application to
any person or circumstances,are held invalid,the remainder of the Ordinance, or application of the
provisions of the Ordinance to other persons or circumstances, is not affected.
Section 6-Effective Date. This Ordinance,being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum. This ordinance shall take
effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting
of the title.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council
held on the day of April 2017.
Patrick Downie,Mayor
5
04/04/2017 F - 7
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
William E. Bloor, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Jennifer Veneklasen, City Clerk
PUBLISHED: 12017
By Summary
6
04/04/2017 F - 8
0R.Tr NGELES
=-
WASHINGTON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 4, 2017
TO: City Council
FROM: ABBI FOUNTAIN,HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER
SUBJECT: Amendment to City's Personnel Policy and Procedure Manual, Chapter 6—
Attendance & Hours of Work
Summary: Add a new section to the City's Personnel Policy and Procedure Manual. The new
section provides a process to approve work schedules outside the normal hours of operation;
working from an alternate worksite; and the ability to flex an employee's schedule. This policy
will apply to all full-time regular employees and will prevail except where it conflicts with any
collective bargaining agreement language or established practice within the bargaining
agreement.
Funding: N/A
Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the resolution to amend Chapter 6
of the City's Personnel Policy and Procedures Manual and approve adding section 6.04 - Work
Schedules.
Background/Analysis:
With the exception of public safety personnel, the City's normal hours of operation are from 8:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. each day, Monday through Friday, except on days designated as City holidays.
Until now, the City has not had a policy or established practice in place to ensure a consistent
and appropriate process to approve a work schedule outside the normal hours of operation. This
policy will also ensure employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement are following
the proper procedure for an alternate work schedule as outlined in their respective agreement.
The policy will provide the City Manager the ability to approve an employee's work schedule
that varies from the normal schedule as long as the business operations continue as required by
municipal code.
For management and non-represented employees, this policy will allow a request for an alternate
04/04/2017 H - 1
work schedule to be reviewed by the employee's Department Director, Human Resources and
the City Manager. In either case, an alternate work schedule may be approved if the schedule
meets the administrative and/or operational needs of the City and does not disrupt the normal
hours of operation.
This policy also allows a management/non-represented employee who is on an approved leave of
absence, the ability to work at an alternate work site for up to 3 months. The policy allows for
the City and the employee to come up with a written agreement that provides duration,
conditions and expectations of the arrangement.
Lastly, for those times when a management/non-represented employee and their supervisor deem
it appropriate, the supervisor may approve flexible work hours to more efficiently deliver City
services and at the same time,provide an equitable schedule adjustment for the employee.
Funding Overview: N/A
Attachment: Resolution
Amendment to Chapter 6—Attendance & Work Hours
04/04/2017 H - 2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles,
Washington, amending the Personnel Policy and Procedures Manual by
adding Section 6.04 to Chapter 6—Attendance & Hours of Work.
WHEREAS, the City's Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual was last updated in
2016; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to update its Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual
Chapter 6 — Attendance & Hours of Work by adding a new Section 6.04 — Work Schedules,
and allowing the City Manager to approve a non-represented employee's work schedule that
varies from the normal schedule as long as the business operations continue as required by
municipal code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port
Angeles as follows:
Section 1. The City of Port Angeles Personnel Policy and Procedures Manual is
hereby amended by adding a new Section 6.04— Work Schedules to Chapter 6 — Attendance
& Hours of Work as attached in Exhibit A.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said
Council held on the 4ffi day of April, 2017.
Patrick Downie, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jennifer Veneklasen, City Clerk William E. Bloor, City Attorney
H:\a ORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONS\RESOLUTIONS.2016-Personnel Manual Revisions.wpd
04/04/2017 H - 3
Chapter 6 -Attendance & Work Hours
6.04 Work Schedules
Application
The provisions of this policy apply to regular full-time employees. For full-time employees who
are represented under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement, this policy prevails except
where it conflicts with the collective bargaining agreement, any memoranda of agreement or
understanding signed pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement, or any recognized and
established practice relative to the members of the bargaining unit. This policy does not apply to
individuals hired by the City on a temporary or seasonal basis, or for a work schedule of 20
hours or less per week.
General Work Schedule
With the exception of public safety personnel whose shifts are part of 24-hour/7-day coverage,
the City's normal hours of operation are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. each day from Monday
through Friday, except on days designated as City holidays. The City Manager may approve
employee work schedules that vary from the statutory schedule as long as business operations
continue as required by municipal code.
Alternate Work Schedules
Requests for an alternative schedule other than the standard work schedule must be approved by
the employee's Department Director, Human Resources, the union (if applicable) and the City
Manager. The schedule must meet the administrative and/or operational needs of the City and
must not disrupt the normal hours of operation.
The City Manager may terminate alternative work schedules when the schedule ceases to meet
the business needs of the City.
Alternate Worksite
An alternate worksite is a location where a management/non-represented employee's work is
performed at a location other than the primary worksite. The alternative worksite may be located
either at the employee's home or at a site other than the employee's primary worksite.
Alternate worksite accommodations may be approved for the management/non-represented
employee while the employee is on an approved leave of absence and when the City Manager
determines that:
• The request is not disruptive to the administrative and/or operational needs of the City,
and
• The employee's work can be effectively carried out and accounted for under such
conditions.
If an alternate worksite accommodation is approved, a written agreement between the employee
and the City shall be executed that describes the conditions and expectations of the arrangement.
At a minimum, the agreement shall include an inventory of materials and equipment provided by
the City, if any; productivity expectations; scheduled work hours; and an outline of the process
04/04/2017 H - 4
by which City-owned equipment, if any, shall be returned to the City upon termination of the
arrangement.
Alternate worksite requests shall be limited to no more than three (3)months.
Infrequent Flex-Time Work Schedule
On occasion - the supervisor mutually with the management/non-represented employee -may
wish to create "flexible"work hours to more efficiently deliver City services, and at the same
time, provide an equitable schedule adjustment for the employee. The flex-time work schedule is
intended to be an infrequent occurrence and cover those situations that occur infrequently such as
after-hours meetings.
The flex-time work schedule needs to occur within the same pay period and may be approved by
the department director, or their designee.
04/04/2017 H - 5
RT NGELES
•
-- WAS H I N G T O N, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 4, 2017
To: City Council
FROM: DAN MCKEEN,CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: Report on Petition to Elect a Full New City Council if Abandoning Code
City Status
Summary: Last year a group of citizens signed a petition requesting that a ballot measure be
brought before voters on the question of whether they wanted to change the form of city
government— from code city to second class city status—"in order to elect a full new City
Council."As City Manager, I have a great respect for the right of citizens to request a ballot
measure be put before the electorate. At the same time, I must acknowledge that there are
differing views on if the election of a full new City Council, as stated on the petition, is
allowed under State law.
Because of the uncertainty surrounding one of the petition's main assertions, I sought an
independent legal review by a subject matter expert on the following question:If citizens do
elect to abandon code city status, will State law allow an election of a full new City Council as
the petition states?
Based on University of Washington Professor Hugh Spitzer's attached analysis, and my own
feeling that it's important we have an answer to this question before the ballot measure is put
to a vote, I recommend that the City seek a declaratory judgment asking a court to provide a
definitive answer.
Funding: Fee to be paid for independent legal review, including research, $5,565.
Recommendation: Authorize City Manager to seek declaratory judgement, and request a
court outside of Clallam County.
Back2round/Analysis: In May 2016, a citizen petition with more than 1,000 signatures was
filed by the group Our Water, Our Choice. The petition came on the heels of a tumultuous period
for the City centering on the issue of fluoridation of the city's municipal water supply. The City
Council, as part of a 3-part plan to gather input on this issue of fluoridation, had sought the
opinion of water users through a public opinion poll. Many citizens were unhappy that, although
04/04/2017 1 - 1
the poll came back with a majority in favor of discontinuing fluoridation, Council chose to
continue the practice. This 4-3 vote of Council left many citizens dissatisfied, leading to the
filing of the petition.
One of the petition's main assertions is that reverting to second class city status would trigger the
election of a full new City Council. The petition states:
We, the undersigned registered voters residing within the City of Port Angeles, by signing
this petition express our supportfor the holding of an election so the voters of the City of
Port Angeles can decide whether to change from the current council-inanager fog in of
governinent under RCW 35A to the council-inanager fog in of governinent under RCW 35
in a second class city in order to elect a full new city council.
As you can see, the wording "elect a full new city council"is bold-face type to add emphasis.
Before we look at what I see as the main question raised by the petition, I first want to recognize
the fundamental process exercised by the people who signed the petition. I have a great respect
for the citizens' right to request a ballot measure be put before the electorate. Few rights are as
precious those afforded to citizens who, through grassroots efforts, demand action by their
government. It's part of what makes our democratic process great.
In that respect, the most important issue is not your opinion on the merits of second class city
versus code city. That's a separate issue. The more pressing question is about the effect of the
petition. In other words, if citizens do elect to abandon code city status, will State law allow an
election of a full new City Council as the petition states?
On that question, Washington state law is complicated at best. Statutes are open to interpretation.
Not only that, but no City in Washington has ever gone from code city status back to second
class city status. Therefore, we have no precedent to guide us. Gerald Steel, attorney for the
group Our Water, Our Choice, has submitted his legal opinion as to why he believes that
changing back to second class city status does require the election of a full new City
Council. City Attorney Bill Bloor disagrees with that interpretation and has submitted his legal
opinion, too. Both are included as attachments to this memo.
Because of the confusion surrounding the wording of the petition, and the differences of opinion
as to its legal consequences, I opted to seek an independent legal review by a subject matter
expert, Professor Hugh Spitzer.
Mr. Spitzer is an attorney and professor of law at the University of Washington, and is
considered a leading scholar on the Washington State Constitution. He has written numerous law
review articles and is the co-author, along with retired State Supreme Court Justice Robert Utter,
of The Washington State Constitution published by the Oxford University Press.
The City provided Professor Spitzer with both Attorney Bloor's and Attorney Steel's opinions,
as well as additional materials subsequently submitted by Mr. Steel. In addition to reviewing
these materials, Professor Spitzer also conducted his own research and drew upon his decades of
experience. I specifically asked that Professor Spitzer provide an independent analysis on
04/04/2017 1 - 2
whether the election of a full new Council would be allowed under current state statutes if Port
Angeles abandons code city status. If it is allowed, then in my mind we should place the question
on the ballot as stated in the petition, honoring what appears to be the intent behind it. However,
if the election of a full new Council is not allowed, then there are different implications.
Professor Spizer's 8-page analysis is provided as an attachment to this memo. In short, his
analysis concludes that if Port Angeles citizens voted to revert to second class city status, a new
election of all seven councilmembers would not be either authorized or allowed under current
state statutes.
Part of the confusion stems from the fact that in the City of Sequim, citizens did in fact elect a
full new City Council in 1995 after they reorganized from a mayor-council to a council-manager
form of government. However, State law has changed since 1995 and, as I understand, the
election of a new Council would no longer be either required or allowed in Port Angeles in 2017.
A basic, guiding principle behind Professor Spitzer's analysis is that when a city reclassifies but
retains its basic form of government(in this case Council-Manager), then the existing officers
(elected officials) serve out their terms because their roles and responsibilities have not changed.
Elected officials, depending on the form of city government, can take on either legislative or
executive responsibilities, or both. Only when those roles and responsibilities of the elected
officials change, does it necessitate a new election.
Professor Spitzer explains that the intent behind the statutes as they are written today is that
officers are not elected outside of the normal statutory framework unless their roles and
responsibilities change. For instance, in Port Angeles, the City Council has legislative-only
responsibilities. The executive branch, or the handling of day to day activities is provided by the
City Manager and delegated through the department directors. Even if the City of Port Angeles
reorganized under a Strong Mayor/Council form of government, with the Strong Mayor having
executive responsibilities, the other council members would retain their legislative role and a
change would not cause the election of a full new Council. Again, in the case of Port Angeles, a
reclassification from code city to second class city, as is being proposed under the petition,
would not change the legislative roles and responsibilities of council members. Therefore, the
reclassification would not necessitate a new election.
There is a mechanism in place, through recall, where citizens are granted the authority to recall
elective officers before the end of their terms. The requirements for recall are specific and
difficult to meet, mainly because it's understood that elected officials will inevitably make
decisions that are unpopular, but they have some protection to do so without fear of being
removed from office before the end of their term. To do what is being proposed in the petition
("elect a full new city council')would in essence be a way to recall a full Council without using
the well-established recall process outlined in the state constitution.
I have outlined for you, based heavily on the independent legal analysis provided by Professor
Spitzer, why I believe it's likely that a change to second class city status would not allow for the
election of a full new council as the petition implies. However, I cannot offer Council a
definitive determination. Even Attorney Bloor recognizes in his memo that the courts have never
interpreted the statutes relating to abandonment of code city status, and for that reason, he cannot
04/04/2017 1 - 3
say positively that his opinion is correct. In addition, it seems unfair that Council be asked to
make a decision on the validity of the petition since councilmembers themselves could be
directly affected by the outcome.
It's important that we answer this question before the ballot measure is put to a vote because
citizens need to know what they are voting on. Voters should feel confident that the question put
before them on the ballot carries the weight of law and will be honored. There is too much
confusion about the petition as it stands to guarantee voters would indeed receive the opportunity
to elect a full new Council if the City were to revert to second class city status.
My hope is that providing a definitive answer to this question will minimize the turmoil like that
we all witnessed last year after the fluoride decision. There is still a great amount of important
work and healing that needs to happen in our community—work that can't happen if we are
again focused on our differences.
Although I have made a recommendation, the City Council must direct the next step. One of
Council's options is to find that the petition is misleading, and for that reason decline to place the
requested reclassification vote on the ballot. I dislike this option because it fails to show the
proper respect for the citizens who signed the petition. A second option is to wait until after the
vote to deal with what effects, if any, reclassification might have on the City with respect to City
Council elections. I don't recommend this option because, as Professor Spitzer notes, it places an
ambiguous ballot measure before the voters without any clear guidance on what the
consequences would be if it were approved. We shouldn't promise something to the public, by
way of submitting a ballot measure, if we lack the authority to fulfill that promise.
I believe the best path forward is to ask a judge, someone skilled in interpreting and applying the
law, to make a determination on the issue. I further recommend we request a judge outside of
Clallam County who will serve as a neutral third party,politically disconnected from Port
Angeles, and in no way affected by the outcome. This path allows Council the best opportunity
to make an informed decision as to the most appropriate next steps, and regardless of the
judgment, will provide enough time for citizens to research and make an informed decision on
the ballot measure.
For all these reasons, I recommend that before the ballot measure is put to a vote, we seek a
declaratory judgment asking a court to rule on the question of whether the vote could lead to the
election of a full new City Council. Additionally, a declaratory judgement would provide an
opportunity for a judge to review any other related issues.
Funding Overview: Fee to be paid for independent legal review, including research, $5,565. If
the Council authorizes the City to seek declaratory judgement, it is anticipated that City staff will
be used to prepare for the court proceedings.
Attachments:
Submittals by Attorney Gerald Steel, Pages I-5 to I-28
Memo to Dan McKeen from City Attorney William Bloor, Pages I-29 to I-33
Letter to Dan McKeen from Professor Hugh Spitzer, Pages I-34 to I-42
04/04/2017 1 - 4
Submitted by Gerald Steel
RESOLUTION NO. R-94-6
A RESOLUTION of the City Council, to request the submission of a
proposal to change the form of government from the present Elect-
ed Mayor - Elected Council form to an. Elected Council. - Appointed
Manager form.
WHEREAS, pursuant to ROW 35A.06.040, a petition has been filed
with the Clallam County Auditor, signed by registered voters in
number equal to not less than ten percent of the votes cast at
the last general municipal election, seeking to change the form
of government from the present Elected Mayor - Elected Council
form to an Elected Council - Appointed Manager form, and
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.02.060 provides that the legislative body shall
cause such proposal to be submitted to the voters at the next
general municipal election if one is held within 180 days after
certification of the sufficiency of such a Petition, and
WHEREAS, the Clallam County Auditor has certified that a suffi-
cient petition exists, NOW, THEREFORE:
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEQUIM 'AS
FOLLOWS:
That the Clallam County Auditor is requested to place
the following ballot title on the Election to be held
November 8, 1994:
SHALL THE CITY OF SEQUIM ABANDON ITS PRESENT ELECTED
COUNCIL-ELECTED MAYOR FORM OF GOVERNMENT AND ADOPT THE
ELECTED COUNCIL - APPOINTED MANAGER FORM OF GOVERNMENT
FOR A MANDATORY MINIMUM PERIOD OF SIX YEARS?
• YES
NO
f
04/ftRO190. R-94-6, ADOPTED September 70 1994, PAGE 1 OF 2. 1 - 5
1 '
• Submitted by Gerald Steel
R
PASSED by majority vote of the members of the City Council this
7th day of September, 1994, and signed in authentication of its
passage this 7th day of September, 1994.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED:
1
5�y Clerk City Attorne
t
�E� NO. R--94--6, ADOPTED September 7, 1994, PAGE 2 OF 2.
04/04/2017 F 1 6
Submitted by Gerald Steel
CITY, OF SEQUIN
RESOLUTION NO. kake
A Resotution Sett169 Election'Oates
Pursuant to ReNjenhation
of the Pian of GaVercuent of the City of Se ft
WHEREAS, the voters of the City di Sequim have approved a
ballot measure calling for the reorganization of the plan of
government of the City of Sequim from Council/Mayor to
Council/Manager, and
WHEREAS, the laws governing such matters call for -an'elec-
Cion of new councilmanic positions in such new form of government
and provide for election of the new officers at a general elec-
tion if such general election is more than 90 days and less than
180 days distant Brom the certification of the ballot measure
adopting the new plan of government, and
WHEREAS, no upcoming general election is available within
the limits of the statute, and
WHEREAS, a special election must be held for the election of
council positions$ and
WHEREAS, a primary is required for the positions prior to
such special election, and
WHEREAS, the city taxpayers will save considerable expense
by combining their election with other special elections held
upon the same day by other taxing districts, now therefore,
IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Sequim that the Clallam County Auditor is requested to set the
following election dates: February 7, 1995 (Primary) and March
14, 1995 or April 4, 1995 (Final) .
IT IS FURTHER. HEREBY RESOLVED that the Clallam County Audi-
tor is requested to set the February 7, 1995 date as the primary
date and final election if no more than two candidates for any
gone position exist and if approved by the County Prosecuting
Attorney and if allowed by law.
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY RESOLVED that the Clallam County
Auditor is requested to notify the City and the public of the
filing date for the seven councilmanic positions for elections
FASEIItl NWEC710MEsa UT-10H
Resotution No. F-°34_8
Version date:Oecember 2, 1944
04/04/2017 1 - 7
Submitted by Gerald Steel
and that the positions be numbered one through seven.
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY RESOLvaj) that the City Clerk is direct-
ed to transmit a copy of this Resolution forthwith to the Clallam,
County -Auditor.
DATED THIS "l day of December, 1994.
pal MAYQR, Ed g&
As Authorized by Council Resolution
ATTEST: APPROVED:
Clky Clerk City Attbrfxey
R
k `
f:iSEouit!\EI.1:CT X oN\ttESOtdlT.toN
Resolution Ito. 94-9
Version date0ece Awr 2, 1994
04/04/2017 1 - 8
Submitted by Gerald Steel
O
ELECTION NAME: General Election Held April 25, 1995 City Of Sequim SUMMARY REPORT
Special Election Held April 25, 1995 Crescent S.D. 313 DATE/TIME COUNTED: 04/25 21:29
RPT #77 ELECTION RPT 108.05
* Council Positon 1 (#/PCT 5)* Council Position b (#/PCT 5)*
* (#/RPT 5)* (#/RPT 5)*
* (No. To Vote For 1) (%/RP 100.0)* (No. To Vote For 1) (%/RP 100.0)*
* * *
* Margaret Corbett - N.P. _394 40.8* Glenn Greathouse - N.P.
494-,50.5* 50.4
* Bill Thomas - N.P. 572 59.2* Paul H. Matkasian - N.P. 485 49.5* �4 f`a
p 0 C 1•/
* Council Position 2 (#/PCT 5)* Council P6siton 7 (#/PGT 5)*
(#/RPT 5) (#/RPT 5)
* (No. To Vote For 1) (%/RP 100.0)* (No. To Vote For 1) C%/RP 100.0)*
1"ot,
~* Sally Sue Barry - N.P. 403 41.7* (Bob) Robert Smith-N.P. ( 608-)62.6*
* Renee Hansey - N.P. ( 563?58.3* "Harry" Schlaffman-N.P. 364 37.4*
* Council Position 3 (#/PCT 5)* Crescent S.D. 313 (#/PCT 5)* (_{ i 3 i•e,r,�, !;rC -{� •� t o
* (#/RPT 5)* (#/RPT 5)*
* (No. To Vote For 1) (%/RP 100.0)* (No. To Vote For 1) (%/RP 100.0)*
* Bo Smith - N.P. 572 .60..7* Levy, Yes 234 53.4*
* Robin Keehn --'M.P. 371 39.3* Levy, No 204 46.6*
* *
* Council Position 4 (#/PCT 5)* County Wide Turnout (#/PCT 10)*
*• (#/RPT 5)* (#/RPF 10)*
* (No. To Vote For 1) (%/RP 100.0)* (%/RP 100.0)*
* * Total Registration 4056
* Ed Beggs - N.P. 196 20.1* Total Votes 1503 37.1*
* David D. Anders'- N.P. (TI9)79.9*
* Council Position 5 (#/PCT 5)*
* (#/RPT 5)* q
* * (No. To Vote For 1) (%/RP 100.0)* �
* Trina Berg - M.P. 64i 67.8*
* M. Jeanne Johnson - N.P. 308 32.2*
* *
04/04/2017 e 1 - 9
Submitted by Gerald Steel
GERALD STFFL, IT
7303 YOUNG ROAD NW
OLYMPIA,WA 98502
Tel/fax(360)867-1166
March 4, 2016
Mark Nichols, Prosecuting Attorney
Brian Wendt, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
223 F. 4111 St. Ste. # I I
Port Angeles WA, 98362
William Bloor, City Attorney
321 1 . :5" St.
Port Angeles WA 98362
Re: 0OC Petition for change of form of'government for City of fort Angeles
Dear Mr. Bloor, Mr. Nichols, and Mr. Wendt:
I submit this letter oil belialf of nly client, Our Water - Our Choice! ((.)WOC). I recently
reviewed a PDN article in the February 28, 2016 newspaper. Brian Wendt is referred to in the
article Eis "the county deputy prosecuting attorney who will review the petition [to make Port
Angeles a second-class city] for conformance with state law." The news article suggests that
Mr. Wendt might seek a declaratory.jUdgment regarding the petition language that states
approval of the petition will result in the election of"a full new city council." Ill that same PDN
article, Mr. Bloor is quoted as stating on February 9, 2016, "1 don't see anything in the statute
that requires the entire City Council to be elected." In the interest of keeping the City and
County from filing a t*rivo]OLIS declarator��judgment action that Could be costly to my client, I
will point out to you the statutes that require election of"a full new city council."
There are two plans of government regulated by "Title 35A RCW: mayor-council regulated by
chapter 35A.12 RCW; and council-manager regulated by chapter 35A.13 RCW. RCW
35A.06.030 addresses abandonment of plan of government of noncharter code city. The last
sentence of that Statute addresses a change from governance under chapters 35A.12 or 35A.13
RCW to a city governed by 'Title 35 RCW and states:
When a noncharter code city adopts a plan oi'government other than those
authorized Under 'Fitle 35A RCW, such city ceases to be governed under this
optional municipal code, shall be classified as a city or town of the class selected
in the proceeding for adoption of such new plan, with the powers granted to such
class under the general law, and shall elect, officers as provided in RCW
35A.02.050.
('RCW 35A.06.030.)
04/04/2017 1 - 10
Mr. Bloor, Mr. Nichols, and mi5vbmitted by Gerald Steel
March 4, 2016
Page 2
RCW 35A.06.030 thereby requires election of officers as provided in R.CW 35A.02.050. The
first paragraph ofRCW 35A.02.050 provides that when election of'officers is required by R.CW
35A.06.030 and when there is no Municipal general election 90 to 180 days after certification Of
the petition clection, then a primary special election must be set and those officers nominated in
the primary stand lor election in the next succeeding special election. For example, ifthe
Petition for change of governance was adopted at the November, 2016, election (the election
proposed by OWOC), the primary election for new officers could be in February, 2017 and those
officers norninated in the primary would stand for election in April, 2017.
The second paragraph of RCW 35A.02.050 begins with:
Upon reorganization, candidates for all qfji(-es shall file or be nominated I*oi- and
SUCCCSSf1JI candidates shall be elected to specific Council positions,
(R(..'W ,35A.02.050; emphasis supplied.) The elected officers in the council-manager form of
government under "Title 35 IZ(..,W are only the Council members. (RCW 35.18.010.)
RCW 35A.02.050 goes on to state that the simple majority with the most votes get four year
terms and the reniainder get two year terms. Thus, R)LIT new council trienibers will get lour year
terms and three will get two year terms. The second paragraph ot*RCW 35A.02.050 provides
that "newly elected officials shall take office immediately when they are elected and qualified."
The last paragraph oil'R.('W 35A.02.050 states that the lornier Officers shall deliver all Municipal
documents to the new officers.
RCW 35A.06.01.0 establishes that the plans ol'government in chapter 35A.012 R(..,W (mayor-
I I
COULICil) and in chapter 35A.013 RC'W (Council-manager) are plans of government "additional to
the plans of government" that existed in "title 35 R,CW before 'l"itle 35A R(..W was adopted.
Reorganization is dell ned as a change in plan of government. (RCW 35A.01 .070(9).)
Reclassification is defined to include a change firorn city operation under Title 35A RCW to
operation ujider 'l"itle 35 RCW. (RCW 35A.01.070(7).) Therefore the OWOC Petition (copy
attached) proposes both a reorganization and a reel assi li cati on. As such, R(,.W 35A.06.030
requires election. of council members as provided in RCW 35A.02.050 and RCW 35A.02.050
requires election Of(1/1 Council members.
Because the statutes are clear, ()WOC is informing you that it will Consider any declaratory
judgment action related to the reqUirernent to elect "a full new City Council" to be frivolous and
brought solely for purposes of delay. If such in action is filed, OWOC will seek sanctions. If'
you have any other legal questions regarding the Petition, OWOC invites You to submit your
questions to me or Set Lip a phone conversation.
Respectfully Submit -d
(iiercald, St el
Attorney for OWOC
04/04/2017 1 - 11
Submitted by Gerald Steel
-13
a) Cd
Cd
:z
cz
W) >
0 0 -0 U
(1�
44
M CIZ
ct CI�
Z
IA
ct 4.
ct
In
Q
It,
U
CL bJl
U 4--
C'3
01
U 16
04/04/2017 1 - 12
ubmitted by Gerald Steel
0 ECCE OWE
4 2016
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
May 4,2016 - CITY CLERK
City Clerk Jennifer Veneklasen
City of Port Angeles
321 East Fifth St.
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Our Water-Our Choice! (OW-OC)herewith presents the original and one photocopy of the
Petition for Election to Reorganize the City of Port Angeles from Council-Manager Form of
Government under RCW35A to Council-Manager Form of Government under RCW 35 in a
Second Class City in Order to Elect a Full New City Council. The Petition consists of 137
successively numbered pages containing the original signatures of a thousand-plus citizens.
The original Petition is provided to you so you can assure compliance with a specific statute
requiring the city clerk to transmit this petition within three days to Shoona Riggs, Clallam
County Auditor. (See RCW 35A.01.040(4).) The photocopy of the Petition is supplied for
retention in your records.
We ask that this petition be processed for a vote at the earliest legally feasible election following
the Auditor's determination that this petition contains signatures of Port Angeles registered
voters in a minimum number of ten per cent of the number of votes cast at the last general
election. In January of 2016,the Auditor's office advised us that this number was 467 signatures.
Respectfully submitted,
OUR WATER—OUR CHOICE!
Eloise Kailin
President
P.O. Box 2418
Sequim, WA 98382 RECEIVE ll
360-683-6644
cc: Ms. Shoona Riggs MAYO - 2016
Clallam County Auditor CL.ALL.AM CO AUDITOR
223 E Fourth St., Suite 1
Port Angeles,WA 98362
04/04/2017 1 - 13
Mubmitted by Gerald Steel Aft
C fam CountyAuditor's office
Shoona Riggs, Auditor
Julie J. Maxion, Voter Registration Coordinator
223 E 4T" STREET SUITE 1 4- PORT ANGELES, WA 98362-3026
(p) 360-417-2221 4 (f) 360-417-2517
email: jmaxion@co.clallam.wa.us
Receipt for Petition (for signature checking)�Ad yOCACy dkV�l�n1`l� tW
Received from C b � We 5
Sponsor
{
Address
I
Email0 fil�x1a bF`Da,L,IS Phone
917– 9b 3H
J J
1
1 Legal Counsel
i
I
Address
i
Email Phone
Petition Name: �(�'� - �.f ChaiC4 28i3irn�2c Elc�IM t
is a petition totaling 13� pages.
�• aganize -Me- CN of Pat �tngQleS
The Clallam County Auditor's Office acknowledges receipt of the above-named petition
for inclusion in the tAnem'62c 20I7 Election.
j Said petition will be checked for sufficiency, and certified as to its sufficiency or
insufficiency according to the Revised Code of Washington.
Dated this _day of WIN 20Tb_. Time-3 ,
imeJ ,
i
i
—
Signature of Acknowledging Offi ' I RECEIVED
MAY 9 - 2016
Title of Acknowledging Official
CLALLAM CO AUDIT QR
3dF 'd
Qll
CIQlI
04/04/2017 1 - 14
d Steel
PORTAMELts
WASH I N GTO N, U. S. A.
Legal Department
t
RECEIVED
May 9, 2016
MAY 9 - 2016
f
� •���►n�co AUDI'tgf
ra Shoona Riggs
er_ Clallam County Auditor
tss-'` 223 E. 41h Street, Ste. 1
Port Angeles, WA 98362
d F t
Re: Request for Determination of Sufficiency
d
a e;
Dear Ms. Riggs:
r
Enclosed please find an "original" citizens' petition together with a cover letter addressed
to City Clerk Jennifer Veneklasen. These are being transmitted to you for determination
of the sufficiency of the citizens' petition as requested in the cover letter. As I understand t
it, your initial determination will be made pursuant to RCW 35A.01.040.
• Under RCW 35A.01.040 you are required to examine many elements of the
petition submitted, including: The format of the petition based on the
requirements set forth in RCW 35A.01.040;
• The text or prayer of the petition which shall be a concise statement of the
action or relief sought by petitioners and shall include a reference to the
applicable state statute ..."
E,
• The validity of the petition's signatures, pursuant to RCW 35A.01.040(4) and
35A.06.040;
• The content of the petition and applicability of the state statutes referenced
within the petition,pursuant to RCW 35A.01.040(1)(a); and
• The validity of the remedy sought by the petition, pursuant to RCW
3 5A.01.040(1)(a).
While you are making a determination of the petition's sufficiency, the City requests that
you consider whether the petition does, in fact, cite state statutes that support the action
sought by petitioners. In particular,
• the prayer of the petition appears to be in error. A change in city government from
a Council-Manager form of government under RCW 35A to a Council-Manager
i
I
i
Phone:360-417-4530/Fax: 360-417-4529/TTY: 360-417-4645 E
Website:www.cityofpa.us ,
0419MAITFifth Street - P.O. Box 1150/Port Angeles, WA 98362-0217 - 15
ubmitted by Gerald Steel
Page 2
May 9,2016
Letter to Shoona Riggs,Clallam County Auditor
Re: Request for Determination of Sufficiency
form of government under RCW 35 is a reclassification but it is not a reorganization
as stated in the prayer.
• Also, the prayer of the petition appears to be misleading because it suggests that
reclassification as proposed by the petition will cause all City Council positions to
be open for election at the next available election date. Based on our research, we
believe that is not correct.
• Finally, the petition is ambiguous. There are two ways to initiate abandonment of
code city status. One is by a resolution of the City Council, and the other is by
filing of a sufficient petition with the county auditor proposing abandonment by the
city of the plan of government. This petition is not clear as to what is being sought.
The petition was not filed with the county auditor and it does not demand an
election. The petition expresses "support" for an election. That language seems
like a petition to a government asking the City Council to adopt a resolution — an
exercise of the right of citizens to petition their government, rather than a demand
intended to initiate an election process.
Pursuant to RCW 35A.06.050, the City Attorney is charged with writing the ballot title. I
will do that after you have determined the petition to be sufficient, if you do make such
determination. Also, according to RCW 35A.06.040, an election on this type of petition
shall be held at the next general municipal election. At this date,the next general municipal
election is the election that will be held in November 2017 pursuant to RCW 29A.04.330.
In drafting a ballot title I will consider those statutes.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this momentous undertaking. If you have any
questions, I can be reached at 417-4531.
Sincerely,
William E. Bloor
City Attorney
cc: Brian Wendt, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
City Council
Dan McKeen, City Manager
Eloise Kailin
04/04/2017 1 - 16
3
Submitted by Gerald Steel
Clallam County Auditor's Office
Shoona Riggs, it
}
223 E, 4th St.,Suite I �", fort Angeles,WA
98362
(v)360-417-2222 -fl 360,.417-2312
ernail:sri s@co.claIlarn.wa.us
May 1.3, 2016
____.____ .......
Ms. Jennifer Veneklasen,Clerk Ms. Eloise 1s ail.in, President Mr. Craig Miller, Esq.
City of fort Angeles Cour Water Our Choice! Craig f1. Miller P.S.
321 E 5`r' St POBox 2418 711 E. front Street, Suite;A.
Port Angeles, WA 98362 Sequim,WA 9£1382 Peart Angeles, WA 98362
Ms. Jessica.Carable, Coordinator
Our Water Cour Choice!
PC.)Box 1644
Port Angeles,WA 98362
E: In re the citizen netition to reel�ssi� f cb a�v�rrrf�z strxretrrr�t`rar°the C;.ft caf �c�rt rhra lcs
The C"lallam County Auditor's Office(Auditor)writes to confirrxl receipt of the above referenced petition,
which was sponsored by Our Water Our Choicer (OWOC:) and filed by the City of"Port Angeles (City) can
May 9, 2016.. You are receiving;this letter because the Auditor has identified you as a real party in interest
concerning the petition, and/or because you requested to be notified when the petition was filed with the
Auditor.
The City has requested that the Auditor review the petition pursuant. to RC'W 35A.01.040 arid RC;W
35A.06.040. Specifically, the City requests that the Auditor review the petition for(1) signature checking,
and (2) a sufficiency determination. As pant of this "sufficiency determination," the City has requested
that the Auditor evaluate whether the question contemplated is valid and should be submitted to the
electorate.
The, Auditor has carefully reviewed these statutes and concluded that they are, suhlect: to more than one
reasonable interpretation concerning the precise role that the Auditor should play in reviewing the
underlying petition. The City believes the Auditor should perform a sufficiency determination that
involves more than a mere review as to whether the petition contains the requisite number of si naatures
required by law. However, this opinion is not shared by organizations with extensive experience in
election law and municipal governance: e.g. the Office for the Secretary of State, the Washington State
Association of County Auditors, and the Municipal Research Service Center. Moreover, the
representatives with whom the Auditor-has conferred believe that the role to be discharged by the Auditor
should be limited to a ministerial review of the signatures supporting the petition.
The Auditor is responsible for supervising local elections. R(..W 29A.04.025, RC W 29A.04.2l6. T'he
Washington State Supreme Court has stated the "general rule" that "election statutes are considered
remedial and should be,liberally construed."Dunias v. Gagner, 137 Wn.2d 268, 284, 971 P.2d 17 (1999).
In accordance with this liberal policy-- which errs on the side of allowing more matters (not less) to go
forward to the voters - the, officers responsible for supervising elections must construe "statutes
04/04/2017 1 - 17
Submitted by Gerald Steel
Clallam County Auditor's Office
Shoona Riggs, Auditor
223 E 4th St,, Suite Fort Angeles„WA 98362
� � ���� (v) 60-41.7-2222 -a^ (f)360-4V-2312
email:sriggs6co,clallamma,us
regulating the elective process in favor of the voters by overlooking technical noncompliance while
strictly enforcing provisions that prevent fraud and disenfranchisement." Community Care Coalition (�f
Washington v. Recno:l, 165 Wn.2d 606, 623, 200 P.3d 701 (2009). Consistent with its legal responsibilities
and the aforementiotied philosophy, the Auditor will be performing a determination of the petition's
sufficiency that includes more than a signature review. The Auditor believes that this approach strikes the
appropriate balance arid, importantly, avoids disenfranchising the voters.
While this sufficiency determination will address whether the petition substantially complies with the
statutory provisions of RCW 35A.01.040, it will riot include a review as to the legality/propriety of the
ultimate question that the sponsor Inas requested be submitted to the voters. See f'hiladellAia H v.
Gregoire, 1.28 Wn.2d 707, 714-15, 911 P.2d 389 (1996) Fischnaller v. Thurston C ou nly, 21 Wn. App.
280, 285, 584 P.2d 483 (1978). The decision as to whether the question is lawflul and may go to the
voters is one that comes later arid is ultimately decided by the Superior Courts sand, the decision to move
the Superior Court to make such a decision rests with the entity responsible for preparing the
corresponding ballot: title. See e.g. flhilad(.4j iia H v. Gre��csr.°re, 128 Wn.2d 707, 911 P.2c1 389 (1996). to
this case, the entity responsible for d:rafl.ing the ballot title is the City. 5ec> RC W 35A.06.050. if the City
believes that the ultimate question is illegal and cannot be submitted to the voters, then it: has remedies
available in the form of injunctive or declaratory relief. See PhrladeljAia 11, 1.28 Wn.2d at. 715-16.
At its core, this is a matter that concerns the City and thepeople of Porgy Angeles as evidenced by the
following considerations:
• It is the City Attorney that has the statutory obligation to draft the ballot title and
statement of the proposition that is to be presented to the voters as a result of the petition
in question. RCW 35A.06,050. See also RCW 29A.36.071.
• It is the City that must pay the costs incurred for any election that submits the question
requested by the petition. R.CW 29A.04.410.
• The ultimate issue to be evaluated and proposed to the voters is one that concerns the
City, and it is one that would benefit from the City's experience and expertise in
municipal governance. Compare Title 35 RC W ("Cities and 'Towns") with Title 35A
PCW("Optional Municipal Code").
• The sponsor filed the citizen petition with the City Clerk's Office, not with the ,auditor,
which is different from similar petitions that must be filed with the Auditor and where the
County Prosecuting Attorney is expected to draft the corresponding ballot title and the
County absorbs any election costs. See e.g. FIC W 35.61.020(3); RC W 29A.:36.071.
• Generally, the Auditor places questions to the voters, which are specific to individural.
cities,pursuant to any request received from the City itself. See R.0 W 29A.04.330(2).
04/04/2017 1 - 18
Submitted by Gerald Steel
Clallarn County Auditor's Office
Shoona Riggs, Auditor
223 L 4th St.,Suite I � Port Angeles,WA 98362
(v)360-417-2222 Ae (f)360-417-2312
email:sriggs@co.cla Ila rnma.us
Assuming the form of the petition Substantially cornplies with RCW 35A.01,040, and the City still has
questions/concerns as to whether the question can be submitted to the electorate, their it. may seek the
judicial relief that it believes is appropriate. The Auditor will abide by any court order subsequently
obtained.
'The Auditor will labor to complete its review of the petition as soon as possible. Please be advised that
the Auditor is presently conducting the 2016 Presidential Primary, which will riot conclude until May 24,
2016, and which will not be certified until June 7, 2016. Moreover, the Auditor is processing candidate
filings for public office May 16 through May 20, 2016.
The Auditor notes the City has requested that this matter be placed (if at all) on the November 2017
General Election. 'The Auditor does not know if this is acceptable to the petition's sponsor. For the
parties' edification only, there are some logistical constraints that the parties may want to calendar. First,
the last date to submit materials to be included on the ballot for the August 20 16 election is June 1, 2016.
Second, the last date to submit materials to be included on the ballot for the November 2016 election is
September 12, 2016. However-, the Auditor believes it will complete its sufficiency detetinination in
advance of these deadlines.
Finally, and as an aside only, given the limited amount of time remaining before logistical cut-offs, the
complexity of the legal issues that rimy need to be reviewed, and the great importance of the question that
may be submitted to the voters, it may be advisable to put the question (if any) to the voters as part of a
November General Election. 'This Would allow additional. thrie to carefully study/resolve any outstanding
issues, ensure a larger turnout to consider the question, and help protect any result ultimately supported by
a majority of the voters.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Shoona Riggs
Clallarn County Auditor
223 E4th Street, Suite I
Port. Angeles, WA 98362
Encl. (1) Receipt for Petition
(2) Copy of Letter(dated 5/9/2016) frorn,the City of Port Angeles
(3) Copy of ,otter(dated 5/4/2016) from OWOC!
CC: Brian Wendt Clal lam County Prosecuting Attorney's Office
Gerald Steel Attorney for Sponsor
William Bloor - Port Angeles City Attorney
Dan McKeen -- Port Angeles City Manager
04/04/2017 1 - 19
Submitted by Gerald Steel
GERALD STEEL, PE
ATTORNEY-AT-LAW
7303 YOUNG ROAD NW
OLYMPIA,WA 98502
Tel/fax(360)867-1166
May 18, 2016
Dan McKeen, City Manager
PO Box 1150
Port Angeles WA 98362
Re: Proposed 6-7-2016 Council Agenda Item for Council to set Election Date
for OWOC Petition for Election to Reorganize the City of Port Angeles
Dear Mr. McKeen,
I write this letter on behalf of Our Water- Our Choice! (OWOC). On May 4, 2016, OWOC filed
its Petition for Election(Petition) with City Clerk Jennifer Veneklasen. On May 9, 2016 City
Attorney William Bloor filed the original Petition with the Clallam County Auditor Shoona
Riggs. With the Petition, Mr. Bloor filed a letter that states, "according to RCW 35A.06.040, an
election of this type of petition shall be held at the next general municipal election." Actually,
the Election Date is not governed by RCW 35A.06.040 but rather by RCW 35A.06.050 which
states:
The proposal for abandonment of a plan of government as authorized in RCW
35A.06.030 and for adoption of the plan named in the resolution or petition shall
be voted upon at the next general election in accordance with RCW 29A.04.330,
or at a special election held prior to the next general election in accordance with
the resolution of the legislative body.
OWOC requests that the City Council consider and adopt a Resolution to hold the election on the
Petition as apart of the November, 2016, General Election. Shoona Riggs copied you on her
May 13, 2016 letter to Jennifer Veneklasen where she states that the last date to submit materials
to be included on the ballot for the November 2016 election is September 12, 2016 and she
states:
given the limited amount of time remaining before logistical cut-offs,the
complexity of the legal issues that may need to be reviewed, and the great
importance of the question that may be submitted to the voters, it may be
advisable to put the question(if any)to the voters as part of a November [2016]
General Election. This would allow additional time to carefully study/resolve any
outstanding issues, ensure a larger turnout to consider the question, and help
protect any result ultimately supported by a majority of the voters.
04/04/2017 1 - 20
Dan McKeen Submitted by Gerald Steel
May 18, 2016
Page 2
Besides the reasons given by the County Auditor,there is another very strong reason for holding
the Petition Election in November, 2016. If the Petition vote is delayed until November, 2017,
the Petition will be voted on at the same time that elections will be held for four council
positions for the code city. If the Petition wins, there will need to be a new election for all seven
council positions. (See attached March 4, 2016 Letter from OWOC to William Bloor) This
means that for four council positions the first election will not secure them a full term, but to
keep their office they will immediately have to run for election again. This is not fair to the
people who run for these four council positions and is not fair to the voters having to put up with
two elections in less than one year for four council positions.
So, OWOC requests that you add an agenda item for the June 7, 2016 Council Meeting for the
Council to consider adopting a Resolution pursuant to RCW 35A.06.050 and RCW 29A.04.330
to hold a special election on the Petition at the same time as the 2016 November General
Election.
Thank you for consideration of this issue.
Respectfully Submitted
Gerald Steel
WSBA# 31 84
Attachments:
OWOC 3-4-16 Letter to Counsel
FINAL - Letter re Citizen Petition 5-13-2016
Receipt for Petition
Letter from the City of Port Angeles 5-09-2016
Letter from OWOC 5-04-2016
CC:
Ms. Jennifer Veneklasen, City Clerk(for distribution to City Council)
04/04/2017 1 - 21
RCW 35A.02.080: Election of officers upon approval of plan of government by voters. Page 1 of 1
Submitted by Gerald Steel
RCW 35A.02.080
Election of officers upon approval of plan of government by voters.
If the majority of votes cast at an election for organization under a plan provided in this title favor the plan,
the city or town shall elect in accordance with RCW 35A.02.050 the officers for the positions created. The
former officers of the municipality shall, upon the election and qualification of the new officers, deliver to the
proper officers of the new noncharter code city all books of record, documents and papers in their
possession belonging to such municipal corporation before reorganization.
[ 1971 e .s. c 251 § 2; 1967 ex.s. c 119 35A.02.080.]
04/04/2017 1 - 22
http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=35A.02.080 8/11/2016
RCW 35A.02.050: Election of new officers. Page I of I
Submitted by Gerald Steel
RCW 36A.02.050
Election of new officers.
The first election of officers where required for reorganization under a different general plan of
government newly adopted in a manner provided in RCW 35A.02.020, 35A.02.030, 35A.06.030, or
35A.06.060, as now or hereafter amended, shall be at the next general municipal election if one is to be held
more than ninety days but not more than one hundred and eighty days after certification of a reorganization
ordinance or resolution, or otherwise at a special election to be held for that purpose in accordance with
RCW 29 .0 .330. In the event that the first election of officers is to be held at a general municipal election,
such election shall be preceded by a primary election pursuant to RCW A. 2.210 and 29A.0 .311. In the
event that the first election of all officers is to be held at a special election rather than at a general election,
and notwithstanding any provisions of any other law to the contrary, such special election shall be preceded
by a primary election to be held on a date authorized by RCW 29A.04.321, and the persons nominated at
that primary election shall be voted upon at the next succeeding special election that is authorized by RCW
29A.04.321: PROVIDED, That in the event the ordinances calling for reclassification or reclassification and
reorganization under the provisions of Title 35A RCW have been filed with the secretary of state pursuant to
RCW 36A.02.040 in an even-numbered year at least ninety days prior to a state general election then the
election of new officers shall be concurrent with the state primary and general election and shall be
conducted as set forth in general election law.
Upon reorganization, candidates for all offices shall file or be nominated for and successful candidates
shall be elected to specific council positions. The initial terms of office for those elected at a first election of
all officers shall be as follows: (1)A simple majority of the persons who are elected as councilmembers
receiving the greatest numbers of votes and the mayor in a city with a mayor-council plan of government
shall be elected to four-year terms of office, if the election is held in an odd-numbered year, or three-year
terms of office, if the election is held in an even-numbered year; and (2) the other persons who are elected
as councilmembers shall be elected to two-year terms of office, if the election is held in an odd-numbered
year, or one-year terms of office, if the election is held in an even-numbered year. The newly elected officials
shall take office immediately when they are elected and qualified, but the length of their terms of office shall
be calculated from the first day of January in the year following the election. Thereafter, each person elected
as a councilmember or mayor in a city with a mayor-council plan of government shall be elected to a four-
year term of office. Each councilmember and mayor in a city with a mayor-council plan of government shall
serve until a successor is elected and qualified and assumes office as provided in RCW 29A.60.280.
The former officers shall, upon the election and qualification of new officers, deliver to the proper officers
of the reorganized noncharter code city all books of record, documents and papers in their possession
belonging to such municipal corporation before the reorganization thereof.
2015 c 53 § 48; 1994 c 223 § 25; 1979 ex.s. c 18 § 7; 1971 ex.s. c 251 § 1; 1970 ex.s. c 62 § 2; 1967
ex.s. c 119 § 36A.02.050.]
NOTES:
Severability—I 979 ex.s. c 18: See note following RCW 35A.01.070.
04/04/2017 1 - 23
http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=35A.02.050 8/11/2016
Port Angeles city manager concerned about upcoming second-class-city vote I Peninsula Daily News Page 1 of 4
Submitted by Gerald Steel
x .
K11
o
3
¢zp -
rxr�
pg � {
stk m2 S �` st a ,fir
4",
t a 'Ea `
1 —
f 1 ( k info
•. � J � �n �L 313 iE 3 tiffs� _ . n � g3ly ,� �. t 8'�`
zn
4, x
�Y•
Port Angeles City Manager Dan McKeen delivers a State of the City speech to the Port Angeles
Regional Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday. (Keith Thorpe/Peninsula Daily News)
Port Angeles city manager concerned about
upcoming second-class-city vote
PAUL GOTTLIEB(HTTP://WWW.PENINSULADAILYNEWS.COM/AUTHOR/PAUL-GOTTLIEB/) « Thu Mar
9th, 2017 2:32pm NEWS(HTTP•//WWW.PENINSULADAILYNEWS.COM/NEWS/)
f
PORT ANGELES —The city of Port Angeles'finances are stable and environmental
hurdles are being cleared, City Manager Dan McKeen said in a "state of the city"
presentation Wednesday to business leaders.
But the second-class-vs.-code-city challenge looms for Port Angeles in November, he
04/04/2017 1 - 24
http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/news/port-angeles-city-manager-concerned-about-upcoming-second... 3/10/2017
Port Angeles city manager concerned about upcoming second-class-city vote I Peninsula Daily News Page 2 of 4
Submitted by Gerald Steel
said.
McKeen spoke to more than 65 participants at a Port Angeles Regional Chamber of
Commerce luncheon at the Red Lion Hotel.
Last May, in an effort organized by residents upset by the city council's then-pro-
fluoridation majority, a petition with far more than enough signatures was submitted
to hold an election that would change the city from a code city with home-rule and
citizen-initiative powers to a second-class city without those powers.
Voters would make the change Nov. 7 to a second-class designation "in order to elect
a full new City Council," according to the petition.
Such a change has "never been done in the state's history, and there's probably a
pretty good reason for that," McKeen said during his 45-minute presentation.
"Does state law even allow the election of a full city council?" he asked.
"If we put something forward, we want to make sure that it has the ability to do what
is intended."
City council elections are staggered — four council members are up for election at the
same Nov. 7 election, at which voters would decide on changing to a second-class
form of government.
Other new members could be elected at the next available election in 2018.
McKeen said in an interview that a legal review on the validity of the petition is being
conducted by professor Hugh Spitzer of the University of Washington School of Law.
That is expected to be available for the city council's review at its next regular meeting
March 21 .
According to the nonpartisan Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC), a code
city allows "broad authority in all matters of local concern," while a second-class city
has "only those powers expressly or implicitly granted by [the] Legislature."
04/04/2017 1 - 25
http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/news/port-angeles-city-manager-concerned-about-upcoming-second... 3/10/2017
Port Angeles city manager concerned about upcoming second-class-city vote I Peninsula Daily News Page 3 of 4
Submitted by Gerald Steel
According to the M RSC, Port Angeles would lose home-rule powers, which McKeen
said at the luncheon were granted to allow cities to respond to the progressively
complicated issues they faced in the 1950s and 1960s.
Port Angeles was a second-class city until 1971, when it changed to a code city.
"Second-class cities basically operate on the concept that to do something, you have
to have state authority to do it," McKeen said during his presentation.
McKeen told the group, without elaborating, that"a lot of misinformation" has been
circulating in the community about the impact of a second-class city designation.
He said in a later interview that some of that misinformation suggests that a second-
class-city designation would expand public meetings law as it relates to advisory
committees.
"if the city reverted to a second-class city, it's under the same requirements of the
Open Public Meetings Act that it has now," McKeen said.
Nor does changing the form of government change the city's ability to incur debt,
McKeen said.
Gerald Steel of Olympia, who represents the anti-fluoridation group our Water, Our
Choice!, which sponsored the petition, said Wednesday he is convinced the petition is
legal.
"Code city gives more power to the council, and second-class city gives more power to
the voters," Steel said.
Fluoridation of city water ended in August in anticipation of an advisory vote Nov. 7
on whether to restart the practice.
On city finances, McKeen told luncheon-goers the city is not using general fund
reserves for ongoing expenditures and has saved $950,000 since 2011 by having 13
fewer employees.
04/04/2017 1 - 26
htt-o://www.peninsuladailynews.com/news/port-angeles-city-manager-concemed-about-upcoming-second... 3/10/2017
Port Angeles city manager concerned about upcoming second-class-city vote I Peninsula Daily News Page 4 of 4
Submitted by Gerald Steel
In addition, a project stabilizing the regional landfill, where years ago garbage that
couldn't be burned was pushed over the side of the bluff, was completed under
budget in 2016 with $6.2 million in state financial assistance, he said.
Also completed under budget was the city's $46 million combined sewer overflow
project, the most expensive public works project in the city's history, McKeen said.
There were 25 million gallons of combined sewer overflow — rainwater and sewage
— that poured into Port Angeles Harbor between Sept. 15, 2015, and Feb. 28, 2016,
McKeen said.
The system became operational in September.
The discharge has been "zero to date," McKeen said to clapping from the audience.
Senior Staff Writer Paul Gottlieb can be reached at 360-452-2345, ext. 55650, or at
pgottlieb@peninsuladailynews.com (ma ilto:pa u Lgottl leb@ pen!nsu I adai lyn ews.com).
04/04/2017 1 - 27
http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/news/port-angeles-city-manager-concemed-about-upcoming-second... 3/10/2017
Submitted by Gerald Steel
Further Analysis Regarding the OWOC Change of Governance Petition
March 12, 2017
A city may be governed under Title 35 RCW as a council-manager general law second-class city
if the population exceeds 1,500. (RCW 35.01.020) Such a city may become a code city pursuant
to RCW 35A.02.130 and retain the Title 35 RCW council-manager plan of government it had as
a second class city. These two plans of government are considered the same general plan of
government. (See RCW 35A.06.030) Such a city may become a code city and reorganize to the
different council-manager general plan of government prescribed by chapter 35A.13 RCW. (See
RCW 35A.01.070(5), (8), and (9); AGO 1970 No. 5 at 2; AGLO 1973 No. 8)
If the City of Port Angeles changes from a council-manager plan governed by chapter 35A.13
RCW to a council-manager general law second-class city governed by Title 35 RCW, the change
is both a reclassification and a reorganization. (RCW 35A.01.070(7) and (9)) There then is a
first election of officers as a newly reorganized council-manager general law second-class city
governed by Title 35 RCW. As quoted on page 1 of the OWOC March 4, 2016 letter to Mr.
Bloor, et al., upon adoption the second-class city plan, the City ceases to be governed as a code
city and elects officers "as provided in RCW 35A.02.050." (RCW 35A.06.030)
RCW 35A.06.060 also states:
"If a majority of votes cast at the election favor abandonment of the general plan of government
under which the noncharter code city is then organized and reorganization under the different
general plan proposed in the resolution or petition, the officers to be elected shall be those
prescribed by the plan of government so adopted, and they shall be elected as provided in RCW
35A.06.030."
As quoted above, RCW 35A.06.030 directs that officers be elected"as provided in RCW
35A.02.050." RCW 35A.02.050 directs that this first election of officers shall occur after the
reorganization is certified at a special election if it is more than 180 days to the next general
municipal election. It directs that council members for all offices are to be elected in a primary
and general election process. Because the election of officers will be in 2018, an even-number
year, RCW 35A.02.050 provides that the four elected council members with the greatest number
of votes will serve from mid-2018 to the beginning of 2022 and the other three elected council
members will serve from mid-2018 to the beginning of 2020.
Re ectfully submitted
Gerald Steel
Attorney for PPF
04/04/2017 1 - 28
ORT ,"" NGELES
,`- .F
W A S H I N G T O N, U. S. A.
Legal Department
ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION
TO: Dan McKeen, City Manager
FROM: William E. Bloor
City Attorney
DATE: March 7, 2017
SUBJECT: Citizen Petition— Second Class City
Scope of this Memo
You asked me to place in writing my opinions regarding the petition to cause Port
Angeles to abandon code city status. This memo does that. Because I am writing
this for your use, and perhaps the city council, and not for a court, the style of this
memo is less formal than a legal brief to the court would be. Based on our
conversation on this subject, I think you did not want that level of detail.
Nonetheless,be aware that I can provide additional details and citations if you want.
Background
In May 2016, the city received a Petition filed by Our Water-Our Choice!
captioned:
PETITION FOR ELECTION TO REORGANIZE THE CITY OF
PORT ANGELES FROM COUNCIL-MANAGER FORM OF
GOVERNMENT UNDER RCW 35A TO COUNCIL-MANAGER
FORM OF GOVERNMENT UNDER RCW 35 IN A SECOND
CLASS CITY IN ORDER TO ELECT A FULL NEW CITY
COUNCIL.
(Emphasis in original)
The petition cites RCW 35A.06.030 and 35A.02.050 as authority for abandoning
code-city status, thereby reverting to a second class city, and electing a new City
Council.
04/04/2017 1 - 29
Chapter 35A.06 RCW governs the adoption and abandonment of noncharter code
city classification or plan of government. Those statutes have never been tested.
No other code cities have reverted to a second class city. Since there are no cases
to illustrate the process of abandoning code-city status, the city must rely on
statutory interpretation to determine how the statutes apply to the petition and the
relief requested. And,the statutes are not easy to interpret. In applying the statutes,
it is unclear whether the petition is sufficient and whether the action sought by the
petitioners is valid.
The petitioners characterize the change from the council-manager under Title 35A
RCW to the council-manager under Title 35 RCW as a "reorganization." In their
view, if their petition is approved by the voters, the city would revert to a second
class city and a full new City Council would be elected.
The County has determined that the petitioners gathered enough valid signatures to
make the petition eligible to go on the ballot. However, the petition does not
automatically appear on the next election ballot. Placing the proposition on an
election ballot requires action by the city council. I, as the city attorney, must draft
a proposed ballot title to present to the city council. The city council must then
adopt a resolution approving a ballot title and directing the county auditor to place
the proposition on the ballot for a specific election. There is a deadline for each
election date. For the November 2017 general election, the deadline for filing a
resolution with the county is August 1, 2017.
Opinion Summary
In my opinion, the petitioners, and thus the petition, are wrong on several points.
First, the change from the council-manager form of government under Title 35A
RCW to the council-manager form of government under Title 35 RCW is a
reclassification, but it is not reorganization. This distinction is significant because
a new election of officers is never required in the event of a reclassification only.
Second, under the circumstances existing here in Port Angeles, a change from the
council-manager form of government handled under Title 35A RCW to the council-
manager form of government under Title 35 RCW would not result in the reelection
of an entirely new City Council. That is true whether the change is characterized as
a reclassification or a reorganization or both. In neither event does it require a
reelection of an entirely new city council.
Third,while an election of a new city council is not required, even more, an election
04/04/2017 1 - 30
is not allowed under the circumstances of the petition. State law requires the
election of municipal officers to be uniform. With very few exceptions, all
municipal officers are elected at the same election dates and in the same manner.
State law does not allow the election of municipal officers at random times, simply
at the will of the city council. That is, except in the rare instances when state law
requires election of one or more new officers, the city council does not have the
legal authority to call for an election of all new city councilors at a time or manner
other than established uniformly by state law.
Fourth, more likely than not, the petition itself is invalid. If it is invalid, then the
result of any election based on the petition would be invalid and subject to
challenge. There are several reasons why the petition could be invalid. The petition
does not, as required by law, state the statutory basis that supports the action that is
identified. Moreover, it is insufficient because one central inducement of the
petition is false. The petition, in bold typeface, emphasized that it will result in the
election of an entirely new city council. As explained above, it will not. This
situation has the potential to mislead a significant number of people who might vote
in favor or against the petition while holding an incorrect idea of what results would
follow.
Fifth, the petitioners' interpretation of the code city abandonment statutes is
fundamentally flawed and would have unintended statewide consequences. The
petitioners have stated publicly that the underlying purpose of their petition is to
cause a new election of city council members. A midterm reelection of council
members, where there is no change in the plan of government, would occur only if
the petitioners were able to establish grounds for a recall election. The procedure
for a recall is established by its own set of statutes and provides protection to elected
officials. A recall cannot proceed unless the petitioners establish grounds for the
recall as set out in the statutes. A judge must find the grounds to be sufficient under
the statutes. In this instance, there are no statutory grounds to support a recall
petition. Here, the petitioners are simply unhappy with the policy decisions made
by a majority of the council. A disagreement with policy, does not, under the
statutes, support a recall. Here, the attempt to reelect the entire city council through
abandonment of code city status is simply an attempt to recall the council without
complying with the statutory recall process.
In summary, my opinion is that the petition is invalid. The statutes do not support
the action that the petitioners ascribe to it. If the petition were approved, the
approval would not trigger reelection of an entirely new city council. The city
council itself does not have the option to call for reelection of an entirely new city
council. Also, the petition does not satisfy a number of the detailed requirements as
established by statute for a petition of this type. So, except for abandonment of code
04/04/2017 1 - 31
city status, the petition does not accomplish what its supporters purport, while at
the same time, it does significantly mislead.
For these reasons, in my opinion, the petition is invalid,probably void, and subject
to challenge.
Options
Under our system of government the courts have the power and authority to
interpret the statutes. In this memo, I have given you my opinion. However as
previously mentioned, the courts have never interpreted the statutes relating to
abandonment of code city status. For that reason, I cannot say positively that my
opinion is correct. Considering the fact that the city council must take some action
with regard to the petition, the following alternatives are available:
I. Council can adopt a resolution directing the auditor to place the proposition
on an upcoming ballot, with a ballot title that does not mention reelection
of the city council. The advantage of this approach is that it does not require
any legal action prior to an election. If the petition is rejected by a majority
of voters, then there is no reason to challenge the validity of the petition. If
the petition is approved by the majority of voters,then it would be necessary
to determine what the consequences are. Would the petitioners still press
for reelection of the entire city council? If so, it is likely that some sort of
legal action would follow.
2. Council can refrain from adopting a resolution directing the auditor to place
the proposition on a ballot. This is justified on the basis that the petition is
invalid and misleading. The consequence of taking this action is not known.
It would depend entirely on the action that the petitioners decide to take.
They might, in the end, decide that this petition is not worth defending. In
that case, they might do nothing or they might choose some other course of
action. The significant downside of this course of action is that it would
appear to the public that the council is blocking their right to vote.
3. Council can seek a declaratory judgment asking the court to review the
issues outlined above, and rule on the interpretations of the statutes,
specifically whether an election of a full new city council is authorized by
law. The disadvantage of this course of action is that the council would
again be in court questioning the validity of the petition. The advantage of
this is that the city would asking the court to give an authoritative
interpretation of the statutes for the benefit of all alike. If done promptly,
04/04/2017 1 - 32
this option might produce an answer soon enough o that the City, the
petitioners, and the public all would know the outcome prior to the August
1 filing date.
Recommendation
Considering the options outlined above,my recommendation is that the city pursue
option number three— declaratory judgment. Although this may be seen by some
as a challenge to citizens' right to petition, it is the only way to clarify the status of
the petition and the outcome of a vote on it. Unless this is done prior to an election,
the citizens will be required to vote on a proposition without knowing whether it is
valid and what the consequences would be.
04/04/2017 1 - 33
Submitted by Hugh Spitzer
Hugh D. Spitzer
Attcrmey at Law � � [Ir ..�
660416' Avg. 1�� �r:� "�...�'E
eaftle WA 98105
§ptLerhd mafl permMAR 2 0 2017
206-790-1996
C I 4 l^;ki iw:
� pror
'� K
. , �
March 17, 2017
Ilan McKeen, City Manager
City of Port Angeles
321 E 5th Street
Port Angeles, WA 98362.
Fie: Statutory Authorization for an Early City Council Election Upon a Change in City Class
Gear Mr. McKeen:
This letter responds to your request for a legal opinion regarding a petition that was
filed by "Our Water-Our Choice!" with the City of Port Angeles (the "City"). That petition
proposed that the City abandon its classification as a non-charter code city under Washington's
Optional Municipal Code (Title 35A CW), became a second class city, and retain the council-
manager plan of government.The petition suggested that if it were adopted,that adoption
would authorize an early election of all seven members of the City Council.' You have
specifically asked "whether state law allows the election of a full new City Council if Port
Angeles were to revert to second class city status."
In preparing this opinion, I have reviewed: (1)the petition and accompanying material
from its proponents and the proponents" attorney, Gerald Steel; (2) relevant Washington
statutes, particularly Chapter 35A RCWW; (3) historical materials relating to the provisions of Title
35A governing change in a city's classification and organization; (4)various City and Ciallam
County proceedings;:. (5) a letter from Gerald Steel to the Ci'allam County Prosecuting Attorney
and to the City Attorney, dated March 4, 2016; (6) a letter from Mr. Steel to you dated May 18,
2016; (7) a memorandum from City Attorney William 8loor to you dated March 7, 2017; (8)
various material's provided by Mr. Steel relating to the City of Sequim's 1997 reorganization
from the mayor-council form of government to the council-manager form of government; (9) a
document provided by Mr. Steel, dated March 13, 2017, entitled, "'Further Analysis of the
OWWQC Change of Governance Petition"; and (10)various other materials I found useful in
carrying out my analysis.
1 The petition's heading was labeled:"Petition for Election to Reorganize the City of Port Angeles from Council-
Manager Form of Government under RCw 35A to Council-Manager Form of Government under RCVV 35 in a
Second Class City in order to Elect a Full New City Council."(Emphasis in original.)
04/04/2017 1 - 34
Submitted by Hugh Spitzer
The short answer to your question is that if, pursuant to the petition,the City electors
voted to revert to second class city status, under applicable state law a new election of all seven
members of the City Council would not be authorized.The statutory framework provides that
when a city changes its form of government in a way that renders its existing officers irrelevant
to the new plan,then an early election of officers is sometimes called for so that the new
officials are ready to assume their duties when the new type of government goes into effect.
On the other hand,when a city reclassifies itself but retains its basic form of government,then
the existing officers serve out their terms, and the expense and dislocation of a new election is
not contemplated. The petition proposes that the City become a second class city but retain the
council-manager form of government. Accordingly, if the voters voted in favor of that proposal,
the existing councilmembers,would continue to serve out their respective terms.
The statutes involved, Chapters 35A.02 and 35A.06 RCW, can be difficult to follow.
However, when one reviews the history of the Optional Municipal Code and understands the
basic structure and intent of these chapters,the complicated character of the relevant sections
becomes quite clear. In order to answer your question in detail,this letter first reviews the
history and purpose of the Optional Municipal Code provisions governing reclassification of a
city with and without a change in governmental form. It then focuses on the specific language
of Chapters 35A.02 and 35A.06 RCW to show how those statutes carry out their underlying
purposes. Finally, it discusses the implications for the City of Port Angeles' upcoming vote on
reclassification and makes certain recommendations concerning how the City might wish to
proceed with respect to the petition.
Background and Structure of the Relevant Statutes
The Legislature enacted the Optional Municipal Code in 1967 following a decade of
advocacy from cities and various studies culminating in the 1966 report of a special "Municipal
Code Committee"that the Legislature had formed the previous year.' Following the Municipal
3
Code Committee's recommendations,the Optional Municipal Code, as enacted, gave citizens
of a city substantially expanded powers to address local problems locally if they reclassified
themselves as "code cities" under a new Title 35A RCW. In addition,the Legislature adopted an
approach that gave Washington cities not only the option of"reclassifying" themselves as code
cities governed by a new optional municipal code, but also a separate choice upon
reclassification, i.e., whether to retain their existing forms ("plans") of government or to
reorganize themselves under several new plans of government.The Municipal Code
Committee's description of Chap.35A.02 RCW noted: "The code cities are granted a broad
I Chap. 115, Laws of 1965.The history of the Optional Municipal Code is summarized in my recent article:Hugh
Spitzer, "Home Rule"vs. "Dillon's Rule"for Washington Cities,38 Seattle Univ. L. Rev.809,838-42(2015).
Chap. 119,Laws of 1967 ex.Sess.
2
04/04/2017 1 - 35
Submitted by Hugh Spitzer
option with respect to forms of government, so that the cities electing to come under the new
code may accept the modernized forms of government provided or elect to retain the form
previously employed by such city." For non-charter code cities, the two choices were (and are)
to reorganize using the Mayor-Council plan of government under Chap. 35A.12 RCW, or the
Council-Manager plan of government under Chap, 35A.13 RCW. Cities were also allowed to
reclassify themselves as code cities with the expanded home rule powers, but to retain their
then-existing plans of government without reorganizing. In analyzing the relevant statutes, it is
helpful to bear in mind two distinct terms:'
"Reclassify" =Change in class of city, "Reorganize"` =Change in form or
such as from second class city to code "plan" of government,such as from a
city, or vice versa. city manager form of government
(council-manager)to a strong mayor
form of government(mayor-council),
or vice versa.
The method for reclassification to code city status, with or without reorganizing under a
new plan of government, is generally set forth in Chap. 35.02 RCW. RCW 35A.02.020 through
RCW 35A.02.035 details process of initiating a reclassification. Under the system adopted in
1967, and still in effect, that process was either through a citizen petition (RCW 35A.02.020) or
by city council adoption of a resolution (RCW 35A.02.030). Under either approach to initiating
a city's classification, the petition or the resolution could call for a reorganization as well. RCW
35A.02.010 expressly states that a city that simply changes its classification to code city status
"shall not be deemed to have reorganized and to have abandoned its existing general plan of
government...." Accordingly, a city that reclassifies from a second class city with a council-
manager plan of government to an optional code city with a council-manager plan of
government is deemed not to have reorganized. But, even if such a change were to be
considered a reorganization, the statutes do not authorize a new election of all seven council
members. There are no new positions. The existing council members continue to perform their
legislative duties,just as before; and the existing Manager continues to perform the same
administrative duties,just as before.
4 See,the definitions in RCW 35A01.070:
"(6)'Reclassify" means changing from a code city to the classification,if any, held by such a city immediately prior
to becoming a code city.
(7) 'Reclassification'means changing from city or town operating under Title 35 RCW to a city operating under
Title 35A RCW, or vice versa;a change in classification,
(8)'Reorganize'means changing the plan of government under which a city or town operates to a different general
plain of government.A city or town shall not be deemed to have reorganized simply by increasing or decreasing the
number of members of its legislative body.
(9)'Reorganization'means a change in general plan of government under which a city operates, but an increase or
decrease in the number of members of its legislative body shall not be deemed to constitute a reorganization,"
3
04/04/2017 1 - 36
Submitted by Hugh Spitzer
In contrast, if a city does in fact reorganize, and altogether new elected offices are
created, then new officials must be elected for positions that did not exist under the former
plan of government. RC W 35A.02.040 provides that if(and only if the proposal includes a
reorganization,the reclassification to code city status will not take effect until after new officers
have assumed office. FCC W 35A.02.050 details the officer election process "where required for
reorganization under a different general plan of government." The underlying logic makes
sense: a change in number, or the duties, or the legal relationship of local elected and
appointed officials implicitly requires an election of new city officers. For example, in 1967, a
number of Washington cities operated under the commission form of government, with three
elected commissioners with legislative power; each commissioner oversaw a specific area of
executive responsibility, such as public works commissioner, The City of Shelton was one,such
city. Subsequently, Shelton reclassified itself as a code city, but it retained the commissioner
plan of government.I Since the general plan of government did not change, no new election
was required. In contrast, if a commission-governed city both reclassified ond reorganized
under the mayor-council form of government with an elected mayor plus a five-or seven-
member council, it is immediately apparent that the reorganized government simply could not
function until the new officers were in place. On the other hand, if a city reclassified to code
city status but kept its plan, of government (like Shelton did in 19806)that city would gain the
broader home rule powers and the flexibility of code city status without the disruption of an
election for new city commissioners. The same fundamental rules apply if a code city abandons
its code status and reverts to its prior status as a second class city.
Abandonment of Code City Classification under Chapter 35A.06 RCW (With or Without
Reorganization of the Plan of Government).
Another section of the Optional Municipal Code, Chap. 35A.06 RCW, addresses what
happens when a city has reclassified to code city status, and then later decides to either change
its plan of government to another form permitted to code cities, or to abandon code city
classification altogether—with or without reorganizing its plan of government in the process.
The 19616 report of the Legislature's Municipal Code Committee included a succinct overview of
the thinking that went into drafting that section of the Optional Municipal Code:7
See, City and Town Classification, available on the website of the Municipal Research and Services Center
0
Classffication-o g v�ew asp_�
6 See Chap. 1.24,Shelton Municipal Code
i w,c ,dr^Icy. WW ilin :,c an W w l gAfri at
'A Review of the Objectives of the Municipal Code Committee;A Summary of the Chapters of the Optional
Municipal Code as Prepared to Date;and a Survey of the Areas to be Completed(Municipal Code Committee
Report,June 13, 1966)at p.I
4
04/04/2017 1 - 37
Submitted by Hugh Spitzer
"Chapter 35A.06 provides for the abandonment or change of a plan of
government by a non-charter code city, while retaining the latter classification,
and also provides for the abandonment of a non-charter code city classification
allowing the return to that clay's farmer classification and form of government.
The greatest possible options are afforded to the cities under this chapter so as
to permit reorganization in the event of a future desire to abandon a code city
classification. The provisions for such options were not the result of any belief
that code cities would thereafter desire to take advantage of such privileges, but
rather were provided to allay any fear or concern of officials of an existing non-
code city which might otherwise hinder a proposed change of classification to
adopt the benefits of the optional code city classification."
In other words,the Optional Municipal Code's drafters wanted to make it clear to cities that
they could reclassify themselves to code city status without the fear that they could not later
change their minds and switch their governmental form or quit beim a code city altogether—
with or without a reorganization at that time. Cities do, on occasion, change from one plan of
government to another.s
When one carefully reviews Chap. 35A.06 RC J, it becomes apparent that its drafters
intended to mimic the framework for reclassifying to code city status and/or reorganizing, but
this time in reverse. Several options are provided.
First, a city that is a code city may reorganize and opt to remain a code city. For,
example, a code city that is operating under the mayor-council plan may reorganize to a code
city operating under the council-manager plan of government. Under RCW 35A.06.030, a code
city with at least six years of experience with a specific plan of government "may abandon such
organization and may reorganize and adopt another plan of government authorized for
noncharter code cities...." The mechanical process of reorganization is described in RCS
35A.06.040-,060, which provides that the process of abandoning one form of government and
moving to a new one can be initiated either by a voter petition or by city council resolution.
l~ CW 35A.06.0�30 and RCW 35A.06.060 together provide that if a code city simply reorganizes
under a different plan of government authorized for code cities,the city officers serve the
remainder of their terms, with special provisions depending on whether the move is to council-
manager plan of government or mayor-council plan of governments But RCW 35A.06.030
makes it clear that a noncharter code city can reorganize only into one of the plans of
Sm ijtp.,.� r�' k�a u�ua �aff..P. �...T..OPM ur ¢ uir� wG mmjll" moenwwouw � . uu :::. �u
�G puri d� cwuri �..f .. cru Town
RCw 35A.06.030 further provWes that the rn charnucs of Oecting new officers under a new plan of govemment is
governed by RCW 35A.02.050,i. .,the statute applicable"where required for ireorganizabon under a different
general plan rat'Rravernimernt."
04/04/2017 1 - 38
Submitted by Hugh Spitzer
government expressly authorized, i.e., council-manager or mayor-council. Only a charter code
city may opt for a different internal structure of government.10
Second, a code city may reorganize under a plan of government not approved for code
cities. In that instance,the city may reorganize but the,city must abandon its status as, a code
city. For example, a code city operating under a mayor-council plan of government may
reorganize to function under a commission plan of government." in that event, the roles,
responsibilities, and legal relationship among the new city commissioners are significantly
different from the roles, responsibilities, and the legal relationship among former elected
officials. Neither the City Council nor the mayor has any role to play in the new city plan of
government. New officers,the commissioners, must be elected under RCW 35A.02.050, and,
obviously,those positions must be filled before the new plan of government goes into effect.
Third, a code city operating under a council-manager plan of government may abandon
its code city status and revert to its earlier status as a second class city operating under a
council-manager form of government. Such a transaction results in a reclassification only, and
not a reorganization. If a city chooses to abandon its code city status without changing its "plan
of government,"that process is governed by RCW 35A.06,070. That statute permits any city
that has at least six years in code city status to "abandon the classification of noncharter code
city and elect to be governed under the general law relating to cities...of the classification held
by such city immediately prior to becoming a noncharter code city...while retaining the plan of
government under which it is then organized." in this circumstance, there is an existing city
council and mayor who continue to perform the same functions before and after
reclassification. Hence, there is no need for an election, and none is contemplated by RCW
35A.06.070. Because no new election is provided for under RCW 35A.06.070, a change of
classification to non-code city status, without changing the plan of government, "shall become
effective upon the filing of the record of such election with the office of the secretary of state."
This immediate effective date after reclassification is distinctly different from the situation
where a city reorganizes into a new plan of government. As described above, an abandonment
of one plan of government to another (a reorganization), is not effective until the required new
officers are elected and ready assume their duties.
"Any city with more than 10,000 inhabitants may become a charter code city with substantially more flexibility on
how it internally structures itself.The process of becoming a charter code city(arid/or abandoning that status) is
detailed in Chapters 35A.07 through 35A.10.Only one Washington code city(Kelso)has chosen to develop its own
plans of government under a charter, although Kelso picked the council-manager form in its charter. See,the
MRSC site referenced in footnote 7,above,and see, Kelso City Charter Sec. 1.05,
While RCW 35A,01.900(5)and RCW 35A.02.130 allow a noncharter city with a commission to classify as a code
city without abandoning its commission plan of government,those statutes do not appear to permit a noncharter
code city with a council-manager or mayor-council form of government to adopt the commission form without
abandoning its status as a code city.
6
04/04/2017 1 - 39
Submitted by Hugh Spitzer
Implications for Port Angeles Vote on Reclassification
The recent petition for abandoning Port Angeles' code city status and reverting to
second class,city status is drafted in a manner that is internally inconsistent and does not follow
the requirements of Chapter 35A.06 RCW. It states in its title that it is a "petition for election to
reorganize the City of Port Angeles from council-manager form of government under RCW 35A
to council-manager form of government under RW 35 in a second class city to elect a full new
city council." (Emphasis in original.)The title, and the text of the petition, fail to state that it is a
proposal for "abandonment" of code city classification. It also calls for a "reorganization" of the
city but then, oddly, proposes reorganizing from a council-manager plan of government to a
council-manager plan of government, i.e., not a reorganization at all. In other words, the
petition could be misleading, because Chap. 35A.06 RCW prescribes mechanisms only for
reorganizing a plan of government while retaining code city classification, or reclassifying with
or without a reorganization of governmental form. As described above, under RCW 35A.06.070,
a reclassification without a change in plan of government is not a reorganization and does not
allow for a new election of city officers.
The petition appears intent on initiating a new city council election without affecting the
City's governmental form. However, even if reverting to second class city status could
somehow be construed as a reorganization, the action still would not authorize election of a full
new council. The existing council would continue to perform the same legislative functions as
before, and the City Manager would continue to perform the same executive/administrative
functions as before. Chap. 35A.06 RCW does not authorize calling for new elections in that
circumstance, nor does any other statute relating to city elections. It should be observed that
there is a procedure for recalling elected officers under Chap. 29A.56 RCW. But that process is
limited so that public officials are protected from repeated recall attempts and are permitted to
fulfill their duties except where a recall petition alleges facts that provide a prima facie showing
of misfeasance, malfeasance, or violation of the oath of off ice.12 That process requires a court
to determine whether sufficient facts exist to proceed with a recall election. In this instance, no
facts have been proposed that would provide a lawful basis for a recall vote.
In summary, if this petition, as drafted, came before a court, it is likely the petition
Would be found defective because it fails to follow the procedures established by Chap. 35A.06
RCW. At best, it should be treated as a petition for abandonment of code city status and
reclassification as a second class city "while retaining the plan of government under which it is
then organized." RCW 35A.06.070,
See, e.g.,In re Recall of Bolt, 177 Wn.2d 168, 173 (2013).
7
04/04/2017 1 - 40
Submitted by Hugh Spitzer
Next Steps
Given the conclusions stated above, at least three courses of action are available to the
City of Port Angeles.
First,the City could find the petition to be deceptive and misleading, and for that reason
decline to place the requested reclassification vote on the ballot. Under RCW 35A.11.100 and
RC W 35.17.290,this might lead to a legal action by the petition's proponents. Such an action
might provide an avenue for a court determination as to the validity of the petition as well as
the impact of a reclassification on future city council elections. However, RCI 35,17.290
appears to focus primarily on the sufficiency of an initiative petition, and it might not provide a
clear path for a court ruling on the question of new city council elections.
Second, the City could prepare a ballot title that says nothing about a future election
and let the matter go before the voters on the November 2017 general election ballot. This
approach is along the lines of one of the options described in Mr. Bloor's March 7 memo. if the
measure failed to gain voter approval, the issue would be moot. If the proposal were adopted,
the City and other interested parties would then have to deal with what the effect the
reclassification would have with respect to City Council elections. This option is not
recommended because it would place an ambiguous ballot measure before the electorate
without any clear direction what the consequences would be if the proposition were approved.
Third, because of the confusion engendered by the wording of the petition, it might be
prudent for the City to consider initiating a declaratory judgment action for a definitive court
ruling. This, again, is one of Mr. Bloor's suggested options. Through a declaratory judgment
proceeding, the City, before determining how to act on the petition, could ask a court to clarify
(1) the validity of the petition, (2) whether the petition is misleading, and, (3) whether, if the
City proceeds with an election on reclassification to second class city status,that reclassification
vote should also be treated as a reorganization vote leading to a city council election before the
normally scheduled date. The outcome of a declaratory judgment action would assist you in
your discussions with the City Council concerning further steps.
Given all the circumstances, in my view the declaratory judgment is the preferred
course of action. However, if the council approves that approach, it should be done fairly soon
so that the results of the declaratory judgment can be known well in advance of the next
municipal general election.
8
04/04/2017 1 - 41
Submitted by Hugh Spitzer
I hope that this discussion is useful. If I can be of additional assistance on this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Hugh D. Spitzer
9
04/04/2017 1 - 42
ONGELE °
,�-
WASH I N G T O N, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 4, 2017
To: City Council
FROM: COREY DELIKAT,PARKS&RECREATION DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: City Pier Transient Moorage Float Replacement, Project PKII-06
Summary: The City received a TIER II Boating Infrastructure Grant to replace the City Pier
Transient Moorage Floats. On March 29, 2017, four bids were received, with Topper Industries,
Inc., of Woodland, WA being the lowest responsible bidder.
Funding Cost:
BIG TIER 11 Grant- $145,774.15
City of PA (REET 1) - $ 48,591.39
Total Estimate Cost- $194,365.54
Recommendation: 1.) Approve and authorize the City Manager to award and sign a contract for
the City Pier Transient Moorage Float Replacement Project, PKI 1-06, with Topper Industries,
Inc., of Woodland, WA, in the amount of$194,365.54 including applicable taxes, and authorize
the City Manager to make minor modifications to the contract, if necessary; and
2.) Approve and authorize the City Manager to make an additional float purchase under the same
contract as project PKI 1-06, with Topper Industries, Inc., of Woodland, WA, pending permitting
and grant funding approval from the Recreation and Conservation Office and the Army Corp of
Engineers for a not to exceed price of$75,000.
Background/Analysis:
In April 2014, City Council approved Resolution 05-14 permitting City staff to pursue a TIER II
Boating Infrastructure Grant(BIG) for the City Pier Transient Moorage Float Replacement Project
from the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO). On February 23, 2015, the
City was notified that it was awarded the BIG grant which pays for 75% of the float replacement
project.
The estimated cost of the project was $350,200. The City received $257,948 (75%) of Federal
funding with the remaining $48,591.39 (25%) to be paid by the City out of Real Estate Excise Tax
(REET 1) funding. On October 28, 2015, the City Council approved the grant agreement from the
RCO. On February 9, 2017, the City received the Nationwide Permit from the Army Corp of
04/04/2017 J - 1
Engineers and was given permission to move forward with the project.
On March 16, 2017, the City solicited for bids. On March 29, the City received the following bids:
Company Base Bid Ranking
Topper Industries, Inc., Woodland, WA $194,365.54 1
Bellingham Marine Industries, Inc. Ferndale, WA $291,495.46 2
Neptune Marine, LLC, Anacortes, WA $301,514.60 3
Marine Floats, Tacoma, WA $324,654.75 4
Since the bids came in lower than originally estimated, the overall cost is now $145,774.15 (75%)
of Federal funding and $48,591.39 (25%) of the City's REET funding. This has allowed City staff
to look at replacing the east float that was not originally included in this project. The east float was
removed due to additional costs of having to purchase a new 80 foot gangway. This is an ADA
requirement for the grant and was an unexpected cost since we already had a 40 foot gangway
leading down to the main floats. The estimated cost for the additional float from Topper Industries
is $70,000, without shipping, and still falls within the original budget. This amount would also be
split between 75/25 using grant funding pending approval from the RCO.
To keep this project moving forward so we can get the floats in June, we would like Council to
approve the lowest bid of$194,365.54 for the main floats and allow staff to work with Topper
Industries, the RCO, and the Army Corp of Engineers on purchasing the additional east float for a
not to exceed price of$75,000.
WWu� ...
W r/ IIIIUi iii
Lf
i
`O of �iy � JV;u6m
i
r
/a� w
e m
r ,
0R.Tr NGELES
=-
WASHINGTON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 4, 2017
TO: City Council
FROM: DAN MCKEEN,CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: Change in 2017 Revenue Due to Mill Curtailment
Summary: The Nippon Paper Mill, one of the City's main industrial customers and a large
consumer of electricity, was recently purchased by the McKinley Paper company. McKinley
representatives have informed the City that the mill will be shut down for 12-to-18 months in
order for them to perform needed upgrades to equipment and to reinvest in the facility. This
informational memo is meant to update Council on how the City will adjust to the temporary
loss of revenue due to the mill's 12-to-18 month curtailment.
Funding: The funding plan is outlined in the body of the memo.
Recommendation: Information only.
Back2round/Analysis: Nippon Paper Mill was recently purchased by McKinley Paper.
While we are sorry to see Nippon leave, the City is excited to welcome McKinley Paper to our
community as they bring new growth and reinvestment to Port Angeles. As with any new
company, there is always a certain amount of time needed to setup and prepare to do business.
McKinley Paper has informed the City that it plans to re-tool the facility, which in turn will
require the mill to be shut down for approximately 12 to 18 months, and therefore result in the
layoff of the mill's employees.
The immediate direct loss of utility tax revenue to the City is estimated at$315,000 for 2017.
There will also likely be secondary impacts affecting city revenue due to the layoffs as well as to
local businesses who provide services to Nippon. I want to assure you that the City has been able
to position itself in a positive financial manner despite the anticipated loss of revenues from the
temporary shutdown of the mill. The City's ability to absorb this decrease has been done through
not just one specific event or policy, but rather through a lot of hard work and dedication by the
City Council and staff. It is this collective effort that continues to build the City's financial
04/04/2017 L - 1
foundation by thinking innovatively to create and adopt new policies and measures that have
enabled to us to meet challenges as they occur.
The City's ability to maintain a balanced 2017 Budget despite the temporary shutdown of the
mill was achieved through:
• Using one-time savings in 2016 that normally would have been brought back to
Council for facility repairs or Capital Facility Plan projects.
• Review of the General Fund personnel, finding savings by more appropriately
assigning engineering positions to the utilities fund as their work load dictates. This
was done without impacting service or increasing rates.
• A collective effort to delay some purchases that could be carried over into 2018.
We have also been able to put additional General Fund contingency aside to be able to deal with
the anticipated loss of revenue from the impacts of the indirect loss of revenue due to the limited
curtailment of the mill operation. This has been done without the need to dip into reserves and
has maintained the 25% fund balance required in the General Fund as set by City Council policy.
The collective efforts of City Council to adopt financial policies to control spending, setting
priorities to plan ahead, as well as the ongoing work of all employees to maintain these
measures, has placed the City in a position to absorb and "weather this storm"without the need
to decrease our service delivery plan, or layoff any City employees.
Finally, and most important, our thoughts go out to the families affected by the sale of the mill. It
has been a pleasure to have had the Nippon Paper Mill be a part of our community, and we
sincerely hope that the families affected by the layoffs will find a new niche in the city and
continue to call Port Angeles home.
As always I am available for any comments or questions you may have.
Funding Overview: The funding plan is outlined in the body of the memo.
04/04/2017 L - 2
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT STATUS REPORT
Jan. 2017 / Feb. 2017
(COSTS SHOWN INCLUDE APPLICABLE TAXES)
ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AWARDED BY CITY COUNCIL EXCEEDING$35,000
ORIGINAL ORIGINAL PRIOR JAN.TO FEB. REVISED
PROJECT TITLE BUDGET CONTRACT CHANGE CHANGE CONTRACT
(Construction) AMOUNT ORDERS ORDERS AMOUNT
2012 SCADA System
Upgrade-Replacement $855,150.00 $570,102.70 $320,920.76 $0.00 $891,023.46
(PSA 2012-09/WW0210)
WWI 0-08 CSO Phase 2 $15,836,159.00 $15,198,782.57 $15,476.76 102,980.00 $15,317,239.33
TR02-2003 Waterfront
Development Phase 2C— $3,729,873.17 $1,238,563.50 $131,313.28 $0.00 $1,369,876.78
Upland
PK02-17 Civic Field Re- $150000.00 $47
Roof , ,237.47 $0.00 $0.00 $47,237.47
CON-2017-03 Pavement $200000.00 $162
Repair , ,740.00 $0.00 $100,000.00 $262,740.00
PURCHASE ORDER CONTRACTS $7,500 - $25,000 AND LIMITED PUBLIC WORKS PROCESS OR SMALL
WORKS ROSTER CONTRACTS UNDER$25,000 AWARDED SINCE LAST COUNCIL REPORT
(QUOTATIONS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT CONTRACT SPECIALIST'S OFFICE)
CONTRACTOR CONTRACT/PO DESCRIPTION DATE AWARDED AMOUNT
OR VENDOR #
Pacific Golf& Turf State Contract John Deere ballfield February 27, 2017 $17,794.81
#10212 /P0443 799 machine
*Legacy State Contract WWTP Generator February 24, 2017 $4,690.35
Communication, Inc. 403512 /P0443584 Maintenance
*Limited Public Works Process& Small Works Roster
Contract
04/04/2017 L - 3
PUBLIC WORKS GRANT & LOAN STATUS REPORT
January 2017 — March 2017
PROJECT PROJECT GRANT/LOAN AMOUNT AWARD
DESCRIPTION COST SOURCE&ID GRANT MATCH/ LISTING STATUS
LOAN DATA
Power Systems
None at this time
Stormwater
Grant agreement
approved by
$676,980 DOE FY2016 $461,250 from Council Feb 2016,
Green LID Alley (including DOE; $153,750 July 1, agreement signed,
Project Grant grant-funded Stormwater Financial minimum City 2015 construction
design) Assistance Program match completed.
Working on grant
close out.
Grant agreement
$680,554 DOE FY2016 $474,300 from approved by
Decant Facility (including Stormwater Financial DOE; $83,700 July 1, Council Feb 2016,
grant-funded Assistance Program minimum City 2015 grant award
design) match delayed due to
State budget cut
Grant agreement
approved by
DOE $25,000 Council Feb 2016,
Capacity Grant NA WQSWCAP-1517- Grant with no January agreement signed.
PaAnPW00007 match requirement 2016 Grant amount
reduced from 50k
to 25k due to State
budget cut.
Wastewater
DOE State Revolving $12,000,000 Construction
CSO Phase 2 Projects, Fund(SRF) Loan at 2.7% substantially
Design&Construction $19,024,031 Construction Loan interest;no match June 2014 complete. Loan
$12,000,000 required complete.
Transportation
WSDOT 2015 Grant agreement
Pedestrian and $200,000 design approved by
Hill Street ODT $200,000 Bicycle Safety only June 2015 Council Sept 2016.
Funding Consultant contract
signed.
Washington Federal $398,540 grant Grant Agreement
Race Street Complete $398,540 Lands Access with$63,761 City January signed.RFQ
Program match published.
Marine Drive Channel $100,000 Surface $75,000(design), March Signed agreement
Bridge Design Transportation min match 13.5% 2015 May 2016.Design
Program beginning.
Solid Waste
2016-2017 Waste January
Reduction,Recycling, $159,000 DOE Coordinated $119,250 grant 2016 Active
Moderate Risk Waste Prevention Grant $39,750 City
Disposal
04/04/2017 L - 4
$3,999,100 Construction
Financial complete,project is
Assistance in 2014. in closeout stage.
Landfill Bluff Cell Interagency $2,200,000 Funding agreement
Stabilization $21,291,000 Agreements with Financial June 2016 with DOE based on
DOE Assistance in 2016 Legislative
to be applied to appropriation is in
post-closure costs. progress.
FEMA
Project worksheet
4242-DR Windstorm $4 $3
FEMA Declared October authorized by
on 8/29/2015 ,267.65 Emergency ,200.74 2015 FEMA January
2016
4249-DR Windstorms Project worksheet
Emergency
from 11/12 to $6,432.77 FEMA Declared $4,824.58 January authorized by
11/21/2015 2016 FEMA March 2016
4253-DR Windstorms FEMA Declared February
from 12/01 to 12/14/15 Emergency 2016
List of Acronyms
BRAC: Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee
BPA: Bonneville Power Administration
DOE: Department of Ecology
DWSRF or SRF Drinking Water State Revolving Fund or State Revolving Fund
NOANet Northwest Open Access Network
NOSC North Olympic Salmon Coalition
PASD Port Angeles School District
PSP Puget Sound Partnership
PWB: Public Works Board,administers the PWTF Program
PWTF: Public Works Trust Fund
RCO: Recreation and Conservation Office
SRF: Salmon Recovery Funding
TIB,AIP or PSMP: Transportation Improvement Board,Arterial Improvement Program or Pedestrian Safety and
Mobility Program
WSDOT: Washington State Department of Transportation
04/04/2017 L - 5
PORT ANGELES PARKS,RECREATION & BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION MEETING
Port Angeles, Washington
February 16,2017
SPECIAL PRE-MEETING—VOTE TO FILL COMMISSION VACANCIES:
The Commissioners used this time to interview three candidates for the two vacancies on the Commission:Port Angeles residents
Scott Johns,Carol Turner,and Christi Wojnowski.Following the interviews and a discussion of all three applicants,
Commissioner Pittis made a motion to recommend to City Council that Johns and Wojnowski be named to the Parks,Recreation
&Beautification Commission for terms beginning March 2017 through February 2021.Commissioner Sutcliffe seconded the
motion which passed 4-0.Commissioner Kirsch was not present during the interviews.
CALL TO ORDER—REGULAR MEETING:
Chairperson Shargel called the regular meeting of the Parks,Recreation&Beautification Commission to order at 6:07 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Commissioners Kirsch,Peterson,Pittis, Shargel,Sinton&Sutcliffe. Student Representatives Brandon&
Palenga.
Staff Present: Director Delikat&Secretary Boone.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
It was moved by Sinton and seconded by Kirsch to approve the Jan. 19 regular meeting minutes.Motion passed unanimously.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
1. Alan Barnard submitted the Francis Street Park Renaming Application.He provided the Commission with background
information regarding the desire to commemorate September 11"in Port Angeles.He wanted to see a permanent monument
celebrating the sacrifices of public safety workers. In 2011,several local members of the Coast Guard were able to obtain an
I-beam from the Twin Towers,and Mr.Barnard worked with them to raise money to ship it to Port Angeles and design a
monument. On September 11,2011,the monument was dedicated.Mr.Barnard feels that renaming the park after the
monument and the waterfront accessibility is a great way to describe what's there and draw more attention to the park.
2. Bruce Skinner submitted both the Georgiana Park and Civic Field Press Box Renaming Applications.Mr. Skinner provided
the Commission with additional details about Quinn Redlin Kintner,including her work advising the City on accessibility.
Before her passing, she set up an endowment with her family and designated that the funds be used for accessibility.Her
family donated$20,000 to the new Georgiana Park playground equipment.Mr. Skinner also provided the Commission with
background information on Howard"Scooter"Chapman,a longtime local sports broadcaster who has spent more than 65
years announcing youth sports.He has also volunteered as a baseball umpire,with the local Lions Club,and with his church.
FINANCE&PACKET ITEMS:
None.
LATE ITEMS:
None.
LEGISLATION:
1. Georgiana Park Renaming Application&Recommendation
The Commission discussed the application submitted by Mr. Skinner to rename Georgiana Park in memory of Quinn Redlin
Kintner.After a brief discussion in which the Commission agreed the application met all of the criteria in the policy,
Commissioner Sutcliffe made a motion to recommend that a resolution be forwarded to City Council to approve the renaming
of Georgiana Park in memory of Quinn Redlin Kintner. Commissioner Peterson seconded the motion which passed 5-0.
2. Francis Street Park Renaming Application&Recommendation
The Commission discussed the application submitted by Mr.Barnard to rename Francis Street Park"9/11 Memorial
Waterfront Park."The Commission agreed that renaming the park to describe what's there would be a great way to attract
visitors and reflect the monument.Commissioner Kirsch made a motion to recommend that a resolution be forwarded to City
Council to approve the renaming of Francis Street Park to 9/11 Memorial Waterfront Park.Commissioner Pittis seconded the
motion which passed 5-0.
3. Civic Field Announcing Booth Renaming Application&Recommendation
The Commission asked for clarification on the new name that was submitted as the Howard"Scooter"Chapman Media
Booth. Commissioner Kirsch suggested to use"Press Box"instead of"Media Booth"because press box is a more common
name.Mr. Skinner,who submitted the application,agreed with Kirsch on the suggestion. Commissioner Peterson made a
motion to recommend that a resolution be forwarded to City Council to approve the renaming of the Civic Field Announcing
booth to the Howard"Scooter"Chapman Press Box.Commissioner Pittis seconded the motion and it passed 5-0.
4. Lincoln Park BMX Track Operator RFP Presentation&Recommendation
Page 1 of 2
04/04/2017 L - 6
Members of the newly formed Lincoln Park BMX Association gave a presentation on their proposal for operating the BMX
track at Lincoln Park.The presenters were Sean Coleman,Lori Coleman,Cathy Bourm,and Michael McGuire.They
discussed the structure of their proposed organization as well as the efforts they plan to undertake in order to improve the
grounds and facilities.They also discussed ways they plan to fundraise,advertise,and recruit and retain volunteers.After
their presentation,the Commission discussed the RFP and Commissioner Sinton made a motion to award the Lincoln Park
BMX Track Operator RFP to the Lincoln Park BMX Association for the operation of a BMX track starting on a date to be
determined in 2017 and to allow the Parks&Recreation Director to develop a three-year contract with the Association to
take to an upcoming City Council meeting for approval.Commissioner Pittis seconded the motion which passed 5-0.
DIRECTOR'S REP'OR'T" I'lower°Point Presentation):
1. City's Joint Meeting with the Port of Port Angeles
Director Delikat updated the Commission on the City's recent meeting with the Port regarding Fairchild Airport.The FAA is
requiring the Port to do another Master Plan before they can move on with an Environmental Assessment.The FAA says it
will only fund 3,850 feet of runway,but the Port feels a minimum of 5,000 feet is necessary for reasons such as medevac
flights,emergency military response,business jet activity,and to allow future airlines to fly midsize jets into the airport.The
City and the Port have directed staff to work on an avigation easement and determine what it would take to get the 5,000 foot
runway re-established.Director Delikat and Community&Economic Development Director Nathan West are the negotiating
team for the City and they have 60 days to bring to the Council and the Port a proposed Avigation Easement at the next City
and Port joint meeting.
2. Olympic Peninsula Rowing Association's(OPRA)Building
After OPRA's building was damaged by weather last year,the club and the City are looking at ways to salvage the building.
Director Delikat submitted a shoreline exemption permit to the City's Economic Development Department so that the club
can lift the building off its piles and put it on the shore until a permanent home is found.
3. City Pier Floats
The City has received the Nationwide Permit from the Army Corp for the City Pier Float Replacement Project at the City
Pier.The City is now putting together a proposal to go out for bids to have the floats installed by June.
4. Civic Field Updates
There is a great deal of work that needs to be done at Civic Field,and one big area of concern is the third base dugout which
is cracked in half.Director Delikat has asked the Port Angeles Athletic Director to move all varsity baseball games to
Volunteer Field until the dugout has been replaced.The hillside behind the dugout needs to be stabilized before it can be
rebuilt.The goal is to have the new dugout ready before the last game of the varsity season. This week,Delikat met with all
parties involved at Civic to schedule a timeline and make sure that everyone is on board with the next steps.
5. Calisthenics Park at Erickson Playfield
The equipment is already purchased,but Jesse Banks still needs$20,000 more for the ground tiles.Director Delikat is
looking for potential ways to help him find the funding.
6. Future Items
a. Commissioner Email Addresses
b. Parks&Recreation Software Program
c. Memorial Program
d. Capital Facilities Projects
e. City Security Improvements
f. Conference Room Chairs
ADJOURNMENT:
Chairperson Shargel adjourned the tueeting at 7.58 p,rn.
Next rneetwng is March 16,2017,In the Vem Burton Memorial Community Center meeting room#3 at 6:00 p.m.
David Shargel,Chairprson Emily Boone,lecretary
Page 2 of 2
04/04/2017 L - 7
0R.Tr NGELES
=-
WASHINGTON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 4, 2017
TO: City Council
FROM: ABBI FOUNTAIN,HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER
SUBJECT: 2017 WellCity Award
Summary: In March, the City received the 2017 Association of Washington Cities WellCity
award. As an award winner, the City will receive a 2%reduction in medical premiums for 2018.
Funding: The City will recognize a savings of over $50,000 for 2017.
Recommendation: This memo is for information only.
Background/Analysis:
The Association of Washington Cities (AWC) WellCity Award recognizes the City's wellness
accomplishments throughout the year and awards a 2%reduction in medical premiums for AWC
coverage eligible employees and spouses. In 2016, the City applied for and received the 2017
WellCity Award (2% reduction is applied in 2018).
Due to the commitment and participation to the wellness program from elected officials,
management and staff, the City received the WellCity award in 2011-2016.
Funding Overview: With a 2%reduction in medical premiums for 2017, the City will recognize
a savings of over $50,000 for the year shared between the City and employees. We expect a
similar savings in 2018.
Attachment: WellCity award announcement
04/04/2017 L - 8
Congratulations on earning the 2017. WellCity Award! Page 1 of 1
iF
y-
Congratulations! You have earned the 2017 WellCity Award!
City of Port Angeles has met at[40 of the WellCity Award requirements established by the AWC Employee Benefit Trust. In
recognition of this achievement, City of Port Angeles has earned a 2%discount on all AWC Trust medical premiums in 2018.
You are among a record 115 employers in Washington to earn the WetlCity Award this year. Thank you for your continued
dedication to building a workplace culture where employee health is valued and supported.The tradition of wellness that you have
established makes your program a model for other employers to emulate.
We're SHOUTING from the rooftops!
You are the first to know that you've earned the 2017 WellCity Award.As the Wellness Coordinator, we thought you deserved
advanced notice of your accomplishment!We'll be officially announcing all the WellCity Award winners at the Heatthy_Worksite.
Summit in Lynnwood on March 22. If you haven't registered yet-there's still time!At the Summit, WellCity coordinators will
receive their WetlCity Plaques (or year plate),wellness committee certificates, WellCity window clings, and a supply of 2017
WeltCity brochures-hot off the press!
Your outstanding achievement will be recognized in a special WellCity Award edition of For Your Health on March 28, and in our
March 29 issue of CityVoice.We'll continue acknowledging your achievement throughout the year-in AWC's Cityvision magazine,
at our Annual Conference in June, and at the Member Expo in October.
Look for more information in April's For Your Health newsletter, including information about road signs, press releases, sample
social media posts, and tweets.You wilt also receive permission to use the official WeltCity logo on your website, email signature,
and other media.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact Niki or Jon.
Congratulations again!
In health,
Beverly Lakey
Employee Benefit Trust Manager
AWC's mission is to serve our members through advocacy,education,and services.
www,awcnet.grg(CEJ Copyright Association of Washington Cities,2017
Subscribe I Unsubscribe
r
UIIItIIIUJWNtV'M'VI't'd IltfntlllllV�l � VIIIOIIIIiIiIIl0111i11' illy tkli '
IIV t�1 IEltl�lt�riCli 11111111111116 ltd t � NSA 4
Association of Washington Cities
1076 Franklin Street SE,Olympia,WA 98501-1346
360-753-4137, 1-800-562-8981,fax:360-753-0149
04/04/2017
https://www.magnetmail.net/actions/email_web version.cfiii?recipient_id=1843185808&... 3 9/-017
OR.Tr NGELES
=-
WASHINGTON, U. S. A.
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: April 4, 2017
TO: City Council
FROM: ABBI FOUNTAIN,HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER
SUBJECT: Update on Finance Director Recruitment and Selection Process
Summary: In February, the City began the recruitment and selection process for the Finance
Director position recently vacated by Byron Olson. Tess Agesson has been acting Finance
Director since March 13th and an interim Finance Director was selected and begins on April 3rd
Funding: Professional service fee with Prothman is $16,500.
Recommendation: This memo is to provide an update on the recruitment and selection process
and is for information only.
Background/Analysis:
In January, Byron Olson announced that he was accepting a Deputy City Manager position with
the City of Walla Walla. The City began preparing for his departure by enlisting the services of
the Prothman Company to conduct the recruitment and selection process for the next Finance
Director.
City Manager McKeen decided on a three step approach; slect an acting Finance Director from
within the existing Finance staff for approximately three to four weeks, hire an interim Finance
Director for about three to five months, and ultimately select a permanent Finance Director by
July or August.
Tess Agesson, Senior Accountant was asked by Manager McKeen to step into the role of acting
Finance Director and she graciously accepted. Not only did Senior Accountant Agesson take on
the responsibility of the acting Finance Director, she also maintained her everyday workload as a
Senior Accountant. Tess has been acting for three weeks and she should be recognized and
thanked for her efforts, extra time and dedication she made to the Finance Department to ensure
the department ran smoothly and efficiently during this transition.
04/04/2017 L - 10
On April 3rd, interim Finance Director Cindy Jensen will start with the City. Her appointment as
interim Finance Director will likely last between three and five months. Ms. Jensen has many
years of both private and public finance and accounting experience. She spent a majority of her
finance career at the City of Yakima where she started as an accountant and worked her way up
to the Finance Director position.
The recruitment for the permanent Finance Director concluded on March 26d'with nine
applicants applying for the position. The City Manager, Human Resources Manager and
Prothman will begin planning the interview process within the next few weeks.
Funding Overview: The professional fee for the contract between the City and Prothman is
$16,500 plus expenses.
04/04/2017 L - 11