HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 05/22/2018 o
MAY 22, 2018
City of Port Angeles Council Special Meeting Agenda
City Council Chambers, 321 East 5t' Street
The Mayor may determine the order of business for a particular City Council meeting. The agenda should be arranged to best serve
the needs and/or convenience of the Council and the public. The Mayor will determine time of break.Hearing devices are available
for those needing assistance. The items of business for the Special Council meeting may include the following:
A. Call to Order Special Meeting at 4 p.m.—Executive Session will be held, under authority of RCW
42.30.110(1)(i), in order to discuss potential litigation with legal counsel,for approximately 30 minutes.
B. Agenda Items
1. City Manager Internal Recruitment Process/Authorize Mayor to Sign Professional Services Agreetnent
............................................................................................................................................................B-1
2. Continuity of Operations Planning (COOP) Worksession /Presentation and Discussion
C. Executive Session
Held under authority of RCW 42.30.110(1)(i), in order Ito discuss potential litigation with legal counsel,for
approximately 20 minutes.
D. Return to Open Session
Action inay follow Executive Session. If so, Council will return to open session prior to taking any action.
E. Adjournment
May 22,2018 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page 1
P99 NGELES
WASH I N GTO N, U. S. A.
,,„ 0000000ii0000ii� CITY COUNCIL MEMO
DATE: May 22, 2018
To: City Council
FROM: ABBI FOUNTAIN,HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER
SUBJECT: City Manager Internal Recruitment Process
Summary: City Manager Dan McKeen recently announced his intent to retire prior to the end
of 2018. Greg Prothman, President of Prothman recruiting firm, has provided the City a scope
of work to assist with an internal recruitment process. According to the scope of work, Mr.
Prothman will evaluate internal candidate Nathan West and provide the City Council an
evaluation report and make a recommendation as to Mr. West's ability to serve in the role of
City Manager.
Funding: The total professional fee for Prothman is $6,500 plus expenses associated with
travel.
Recommendation: Based on input from the City Council, Human Resources recommends the
City Council authorize Mayor Bruch to sign the professional services contract with Prothman.
Background/Analysis:
A strong organization understands the benefit of having well qualified, trained and interested
managers who are actively seeking to advance into higher level positions. With succession
planning in mind, the City Manager's office has a Continuity of Services Plan which ensures that
the activities of the office continue during absences.
During the past six years,Nathan West, Community and Economic Development Director has
been the primary Acting City Manager in City Manager Dan McKeen's absence. Mr. West's
understanding of all City operations, demonstration of high problem-solving skills and his ability
to work well with City Council, staff and the community provides him the necessary
qualifications to act in this capacity.
With the recent announcement of Manager McKeen's retirement, City Council began discussions
on a process to select the next City Manager. City Council determined that Nathan West is a
strong potential candidate for the position. City Council requested that the City consult with an
executive level recruiting firm to interview City Council and Department Directors to identify
ideal candidate traits and conduct an evaluation of Mr. West and to provide an evaluation report
and recommendation to the City Council as to the Mr. West's ability to serve in the role of City
Manager.
Greg Prothman, President of Prothman recruiting firm, has provided a scope of work to evaluate
Mr. West's skills, talents and abilities as they relate to the position of City Manager for the City
of Port Angeles. Topics covered in the evaluation will include:
• Management/leadership style
• Communication style
• Budgeting
• Involvement in the community
• Strategic visioning
• Council interaction skills
• Personnel skills
• Knowledge of all city departments
• Fit with ideal candidate traits
Once the candidate interview is completed, Mr. Prothman will provide the City Council an
evaluation report and make a recommendation as to the candidate's ability to serve in the role of
City Manager and to identify areas (if any) that might need support and additional training.
Funding Overview:
The total professional fee for Prothman is $6,500 plus expenses associated with travel. An
external recruitment process typically costs $25,000.
Attachment: Prothman City Manager Evaluation— Scope of Work
.ww %ZiC7�T7�/MAN
May 15, 2018
Abbi Fountain
City of Port Angeles
321 E 5th St
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Dear Ms. Fountain;
You have inquired if Prothman would be able to assist the City in the evaluation of the Community
& Economic Development Director, Nathan West, as a potential candidate for city manager.
Following for your review is our proposed scope of work leading to an evaluation of Mr. West's
skills,talents and abilities as they relate to the position of city manager for the City of Port Angeles.
City Manager Evaluation — Scope of Work
1. Identify Ideal Candidate Traits
➢ Conduct an interview with the City Council
➢ Conduct an interview with the Department Directors
2. Develop Ideal Candidate Traits Document
➢ Send to City Council for review and edits
➢ Update as needed
3. Conduct Candidate Interview
Review the following topics:
• Management/leadership Style
• Communication Style
• Budgeting
• Involvement in the Community
• Strategic Visioning
• Council Interaction Skills
• Personnel Skills
➢ Hiring
➢ Progressive Discipline
➢ Labor Issues
• Knowledge of all city departments
• Fit with ideal candidate traits
4. Develop Candidate Evaluation Report
5. Deliver Report to the City Council and Make Recommendations
Anticipate two trips to Port Angeles, the first is to interview the City Council and Department
Directors. The second is to deliver the evaluation report to the City Council, make a
recommendation as to the candidate's ability to serve in the role of city manager and to identify
areas (if any) that might need support and additional training.
206.368.0050 * 371 NE Gilman Blvd., Suite 310 Issaquah,WA 98027 * www.prothman.com
6. If the recommendation is favorable as to the candidate's abilities and the City Council moves
forward with the appointment process, develop a two-year professional development plan
using information obtained from the process outlined in sections 1, 2 and 3. The plan will be
provided to the City Council no more than two weeks after requested by the City Council.
Compensation for the time needed to complete the professional development plan is subject
to the professional fee charges identified below.
7. The primary point of contact to coordinate the City Manager evaluation, and if needed the
professional development plan, is Abbi Fountain Human Resources Manager at 360-417-
4510 or afountai@cityofpa.us
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND PROPOSED HOURS
The total professional fee for conducting the above scope of work is $6,500; half billed at the
beginning of the evaluation and the second half at the delivery of the report. Expenses are billed
monthly. Expenses include but are not limited to:
• Consultant travel is billed at $82.50 per hour, mileage at the IRS rate and ferry fees
• Any client-required licenses, fees or taxes
• Other similar expenses
Should the City wish to expand the project beyond the scope of work, the professional fees will
be billed at $165 per hour, on a mutually agreed upon modified scope of work. The City may
cancel the contract at any time. The City's only obligation would be the fees and expenses
incurred prior to cancellation.
If the scope of work is acceptable please sign and return a copy to our office
Sincerely,
Prothman City of Port Angeles
» c 5/10/2018
Gre rothman date Sissi Bruch date
President Mayor
fY 14$014W 2 1 P �i
Nrtional P.rkS.rvice
U.S Deprrtment ofthc lntcrior
Olympic N.tion l Prrk
Wrshitrglon
Elwha River
Ecosystem
Restoration
fmplementation
Final Supplement to the Final
Environmental Impact Statement
July 2005
Affected Ewironment
Between RM 2.8 and the river mouth, the floodplain widens and is bound on the west side by steep cliffs
of glacial deposits more than 150 feet high. The pre-dam river migrated throughout the entire floodplain;
nearer the mouth, it moved laterally over an area 1.2 miles wide. The erosive action of the meandering
river prevented the establishment of a matue evergreen forest. But dam construction has caused the
channel to shift less frequently and dense, woody vegetation has grown near the mouth, increasingly con-
straining the river in the lower reach. The 1.5-mile-long lower Elwha federal flood control levee on the
east side ofthe floodplain constrains the eastward migration ofthe river. A 9o0-fooflong privately owned
levee downstream from the high river bluffs on the west side ofthe river also restricts the floodplain near
the river mouth.
At the mouth of the river an extensive delta roughly 5 miles wide, 6 miles long and an estimated 200 feet
thick has formed. It is composed ofsand, gravel, and cobbles, and samples indicate a sand and gravel sur-
face to approximately 2,000 feet offshore (USACE l97l). Because the dams have blocked much of the
natural sediment transport, the only current source ofdelta sediment is from the erosion of loose material
(alluvium) from the bluffs along the west side of the river in the 4.9 miles upstream from the mouth. As a
result, sediment yields to the delta have dropped from a pre-dam total sediment supply of 280,000 cubic
yards per year to 5,900 cubic yards per year, approximately 2% of the pre-dam volume (FERC 1993).
Sediment from the Elwha delta moves with the currents in the strait, predominantly in an eastward direc-
tion along the coast. The sediment nourishes beaches and nearshore areas with sand and gravel, and sup-
plies some ofthe sediment to Ediz Hoolq which forms the bayward side of Port Angeles Harbor (FERC
1993). The drastic reduction in bedload sediment supply from the river has caused 75-150 feet of beach
erosion along the westem edge of Ediz Hook (FERC 1993).
Flooding
The floodplain between the dams (fiom Glines canyon Dam to the U.S. Highway I d I bridge at the head
of Lake Aldwell) can be characterized as a largely undeveloped, relatively narrow floodplain confined by
steep, forested valley side slopes. The river gradient in these sections averages 40 feet per mile, ard the
river flows swiftly. There is no development within the I 00-year floodplain on the west side of the river
between the dams. but five residential properties (four near RM 8.4, one near RM 9.7) lie within the
floodplain on the east side ofthe river. Four ofthese residences are lulnerable to 5- to 25-year floods, and
the fifth residence 'ivas recently constructed on a raised metal platform. Portions of the Olympic Hot
Springs Road (Elwha Valley Road), paralleling the east side ofthe river channel, and the Elwha and Al-
tair campgrounds in Olympic National Park also lie within the 100-year floodplain. The Elwha Ranger
Stafion facilities near RM 12.1 are just I foot above the 100-year floodplain. In addition to their location
in the floodplain, both Hot Springs Road and the Elwha Ranger Station are rulnerable to loss through
bank erosion following dam removal. Monitoring to determine whether bank erosion is occurring would
take place during dam removal, and bank protection in the form of large angutar rock, engineered log
jams, or a combination ofthe two would be apptied as needed to stabilize the bank.
The area from the Elwha Dam to RM 4 is forested and relatively undeveloped. In the broad floodplain
between the old Highway 112 bridge (at RM 3.3) and RM 4, two residential properties on the west side of
the river and one on the east side are flooded every 10 to 30 years on average; these residences lie ap-
proximately 3 feet below the current 100-year flood elevation. The DCWA wells and wellhead access
road on the east side ofthe river are also within the 100-year floodplain.
Compared to the middle reach ofthe river, the floodplain along the lowest 3 miles broadens significanfly
and has a much lower gradient (approximately 15 feet per mile). Development in this portion oJtte tOO-
62
East Ba* Residence (neo RM 9.5) - Located just downstream from the park boundary on the east bank
ofthe Elwha River, this stmcture is currently above the 200-year floodplain and would be above the !00-
year floodplain after dam removal. However, the resident reports active bank erosion is endangering his
property. lncreased river stages (average of 0.5 feet) could increase theI-ate oferosion.
Elwha Campgrowd. (RM I I .0) - The Elwha campground lies below the 100-ye flood level and cur-
rently floods during a less than 5-year flood level. The removal ofthe dams could increase water surface
elevation up to 0.5 feet, which could qruse more frequent flooding. No active flood protection measures
would be taken because use is seasonal and outside flood periods; flood wamings are provided and the
Elwha subdistrict is closed during floods; and the campground has minimal development.
Elwha Ranger Station (RM 12.0) - The Elwha Ranger Station structures are approximately 2 feet above
the 100-year flood elevation. Dam removal would increase water surface elevation ofup to 0.5 feet, and
the structures would still be above the 100-year flood elevation. Increased bank erosion could pose a
threat to the ranger station following dam removal. If needed, stabilizing the bank or installing engineered
logjams would provide flood protection.
Altair Campground (RM 12.5) - The Altair campgound is partially inundated during annual floods and
could flood by as much as 8 feet during a 100-year event. Flooding would increase by about 0.5 feet with
removal ofthe Glines Canyon Dam. No active flood protection measures would be taken, as described for
the Elwha campground, because use is seasonal and outside flood periods (campground is closed from
late summer / early fall to late spring / early summer); flood warnings are provided and the Elwha subdis-
trict is closed during floods; and the campground has minimal development.
Elwha Valley Road (Olympic Hot Springs Road) - ElwhaYalley Road parallels the river on its east bank
from U.S. Highway l0l to the Glines Canyon Dam. Three sections of the road are overtopped by 5- to
lO-year flood levels. Removing the dams would increase the frequency that flood levels would close or
damage the road. The highly flood-prone areas occur between RM 8.1 and 8.4 (downstream ofthe train-
ing dike), between RM 9.8 and 10.2 (iust upstream of the park entrance), and between RM 10.8 and I1.7
(the Elwha campground to the ranger station). Flood depths over the road during a l0-year event can ap-
proach 2.5 feet at RM I l.l. The impacts from dam removal at these locations would be relatively minor
compared to existing conditions, and the following measures would provide existing levels of protection
- raise about 1.0 mile of low-elevation road sections within the parh raise 0.3-O.6 mile of road outside
the parlq and armor select sections ofthe road. These actions would not alleviate all future flood rish bul
would reduce the severity of floods.
Bridges - After dam removal, water flow under four bridges - the Elwha River Road near the fish-
rearing faoility, Highway I 12 near RM 3.3, U.S. l0l near RM 7.7, alld the Elwha Valley Road near the
Altair campground near RM 12.6 - would not be substantially affected by higher floodwater elevations.
Increased volumes of woody debris floating down the river could affect the in-water piers ofthe U.S. l0l
and Altair campground bridges.
Impacts on the Natural Floodplain. For the most part mitigation measr.res described above and pre-
sented in Table I I would provide the same level of protection as these structures and facilities have now,
so there would be no impact to them resulting from higher flood stages or fiequency after dam removal.
ln other words, structures would be able to withsland floods to the extent they can now. The only excep-
tions might be facilities inside Olympic National Park (e.g., the Altair and Elwha campgrounds, and the
Elwha Ranger Station), which would remain unmitigated.
Flooding: Impacts of the Proposed Action
109
Surface Water: Summary of Regulations and Policies
lowered riverbed prevents the activation of this side channel habitat in all but the most severe (e.g., 200-
year) flood. However, compared to the value that this pafi ofthe floodplain could have offered fish, wilfl-
life, and vegetative species had it not been blocked or constrained by levees, some loss of function would
occur. This is true regardless ofthe altemative choseL including no-action.
Lengthening the private levee near the river mouth could continue existing impacts to the floodplain and
hydraulic connectivity between the Elwha River and an adjacent tidal wetland. Removing the levee and
raising individual rcsidences could help restore some of this connectivity and the natural floodplain dy-
namics in this area.
Relocating intake facilities would change the surface water elevations and the floodplain at their present
location (RM 3.5) and at the location ofthe new facility (225 feet upstream). The floodplain in the area of
the proposed new facility is wide, but the eastem side is constrained by cliffs, similar to the DCWA well
field. The floodplain would be altered in that the westem end would be filled constantly rather than just at
flood stage. This would be an adverse change, but because it is localized the impact would be no more
than minor. Removing the rock diversion structure downstream would result in benefits to the floodplain
function, both ecologically and as a protective space for residents or structues in the vicinity. Again, be-
cause the extent of filling behind this dam is localized and of smaller scale, benefits would be minor.
The remaining flood control mitigation measures described above would have little or no impact to the
floodplain compared to the no-action altemative. This is because they would maintain flooding ftequency
at their currenl levels.
Cumulotive Irrrpacls
No cumulatiye impacts beyond those described above for the no-action altemative are expected.
Conclusion
All structures and facilities would be protected from any impact associated with dam removal and in-
creased aggradation of riverbed sediments through the use of mitigation measures. However, cumulative
increases in flood stage unrelated to dam removal or other NPS activities appear to be an ongoing trend.
A re-analysis of the potential for flooding has resulted in changes in some of the proposed mitigation
measures. The placing offlood control measures would have minor adverse impacts on the natural flood-
plain over the long term, in particular along the federal levee. No impairment to park resources would
occur from implementing the flood control actions described in this altemative.
Surface llater
Summary of Regulations and Policies
The Clean water Act controls discharge to waterways and the dredge and fill of wetlands. The permis
required to discharge to waterways are obtained from the Washington Department of Ecolory e.JpDES
permit), and to dredge and fill walands, from the U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers (Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, section 404 permit).
The Safe Drinking Water Act controls requiiements and standards for public drinking water supplies.
lll
elerlation of400 feet by btasting in 7.5 foot lifts. All remaining concrete rubble would be removed Aom the river
channel by October 201l The concree thrust btock gravity wall, and embankmenl on the right abuunent and the
left abutment gated spillway would be retained for use as public overlook. The penstock, gate house, powerhouse,
and other buildings at the site may be retained for either their historical significance or inlerpretive potential.
Rdeose of Sedimena
The hydroelectric projects have dramatically altered the landscape by inundating about 5.3 miles of river and 684
acres of lowland habitat. About I 1.3 million cubic yards of sediment are trapped in Lake Mills and from 2.6 to 4.0
million cubic yards are trapped in La.ke Aldwell. With the interception of bedload (cobbles, gnvel, and sand) by
Lake Mitls and Lake Aldwetl, the spauning habitat downst€am from both dams has been badly eroded such that
much ofthe former spawning area now consists of substrate that is too large to b€ used by spawning fish. The tratr
ping of bedload in the reservoirs has also contributed to the erosion of estuarine and near-shore marine habitar, in-
cluding Ediz Hook at Port Angeles Harbor.
Although a portion of the fine sediment (clays and silts) has escaped the reservoirs and been transported down-
st€am, the bedload has been retained. As a result, the riverbed may be as much as I to 5 feet lower than under pre-
dam conditions and is composed primarily ofcobbles and boulders which move only during very high flood events.
River elevation has also dropped and, as a result, is more often co ained within its channel during moderate flow
conditions.
Removing the dams and atlowing the river to erode sediments downstream would restore the natural uansport of
sediment from the uppor to lo\f,er river, estuary, and near-shore marine areas. Up to 9 to 12 million cubic yards of
sediment one-halfto two-lhirds ofthe otal) could be introduced back into the river system. Veg€tation in the for-
mer reservoir areas, channel activities, and substrate conditions would eventually retum to pre-dam conditions. In-
creased sediment to the coastal areas would create shoals and bars and supply sediment to the river delta, Angeles
Point, and Ediz Hook. Over time, some or all ofrhese features would be panially or fully restored.
Increases in suspended solids muld kill large numben of fish, their eggs, and other aquatic lifs in the shon term.
Users who withdraw water surfac€ water would be directly affected by this sediment in th€ short term. ln the long
run, water quality would be similar to existing conditions.
Roobea! lmprovements
The Elwha Dam Road is expected to require upg."ding to accommodate the increased conshuction-related traffic
and the large heavily-loaded vehicles. Upgrade ofthe road would occur in November or December 2008.
The Olympic Hot Springs Road (also called the Elwha Valley Road) parallels tbe river along thc east bank and pro-
vides access to the Olympic National Park (Park), Consbuction activities associated with dam removal would affect
the condition of the road and require road repair and mainlenance during and after dam removal, Upgrade of the
road would occur in Mvember or December 2008. In addition, portions ofthe road may be raised (between 1.5 and
2.5 feet) to concurrently serve as a low flood control dike to pmtect nearby residences.
The Crown Z Road that leads to the industrial channel and rearing facility would also be upgraded and traftic control
devices could be used at the top and bonom ofthis road wilh vehicle-waiting areas established on the Elwha River
Road. A second altemative consists of new and/or improved existing roads along sections of Kaycee Way and two
unnamed gravel roads to the north end of thc Washington Depanme of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Rearing Chan-
nel location. About 2,700 feet ofnew road and 3,800 feet of upgraded road would be required. A third road follows
Rife Road to one of the urnamed roads identified above for the second altemative route. About 1,500 feet of new
road to connect Rife Road and the existing gravel road would be required.
The design vehicle for the roads is assumed to be a semi tractor-trailer combination. The expected vehicle use and
frequency during construction of waler treatment facilities include peaks of 50 healy vehicles entering and leaving
the site per day. Traffc would consist primarily of conuete delivery trucks entering th€ site loaded and leaving
empty, and dump mrcks with trailers and semi tractor-trailer combinations entering and leaving the site both full and
empty al different times. During operation ofthe water mitigarion facilities, traffc would consist of private vehicles
for plant operation and maintenance staff and semi tractor-trailer combinations for chemical deliveries. Peak usage
302
Appendixes
Appendixes
LocATtoN aND STRUCI u-_RE Rlt MITtcATIo."
West bank rcsidences 3.5 Ring dike; move on site, and elevate udtil first floor is
4.5'higier.
East hrnk residence 3.5 Move on site and elev.tr uatil first floor is 4.5' higher
DCWA \tellfield and acceas mad 3.1
East bank private well 1.9 Raise wellhead
East bank residences 8.4 Move offsite (remporary stsuc{uE); elevate in place and
use a ring dike; or move to higher groudd on site.
River training dike Rsise dike I .5' and amDr with riprap (not in USACE
2003 rcpon).
East bank residence Raise or floodproofrcsidence; armor chaanel bank with
riprap 15' high ard 3' thick.
Elwha Campground I 1.0 Develop an approved contingency/pmtectioD plan that
could irclude closirg the campground during high flous,
rclocating it ifsuitable arces outside floodplaio ar€ avail-
able, or providing flood p.otection structures (e.g., bank
stabilization. engineered logjams).
E]wha ranger station (including structurei septic
systerl roads, and utilities)
Moditor/evaluate bank erosion threat ad take corrcaive
action (e.g., bank stabilizstio4 eryineered logjaos) as
needed.
12.0
Altaire Campgound \2.5 Develop an approved contingency/protection plan that
could include closing the campground during high flows,
relocating it ifsuitable arcas outside floodplaio are avail-
able, or providing flood protection shucturEs (e.g.. bank
stabi lizariorL engineered logjalns).
Elwia Valley (Olympic Hot Spriqs) Road - 4
miles long
Raise about I mile oflow-elevation sectioos ofthe rcad
ir lhe park and 0.33 mile ofroad outside ofpark by l'.
Riprap select sections ofroad. (USACE 2003 report rec-
ommends monitoaing lo assess when or ifa road segment
needs to be raised.)
Bridges:
U.S. Highway l0l
Elwfia Valley Road
7.1
t2.t
Add debris deflectors to rhe in-water piers.
Hatchery Improyemen8
Two options for the tribal hatchery were evaluated: (l) expanding facilities at the existing site, or (2) moving to a
locatior at the Halberg property (RM 2.V2.3). A hatchery at the Hatberg location could result in a facility with
greater functionality and thal would be simpler to use and less frequently affect€d by high water events in the Elwha
fuver. It is the preferred altemative for these reasons. The facility would use gravity water flow for the supply ofall
surface water, a shorter pip€line to deliver water from the EWTP (in the short term) and the Elwha surface water
intake (in the long term). River levels and conditions would not adversely impact the ability ofadult fish to enter the
facility or the volitional release ofjuveniles. Facility infrasfucture would be new, would require less long-term
maintenance, and would not be adversely impacted by constant exposure to soils saturated with groundwater, as
could occur at the existing hatchery site.
306
lfexisting sire maintained on the esst side, raise groutld
Ievel, esd grade, one well house, and two wellheads. If
altemslir€ site d€velo!,€d on the west side, .aise wellfield
atga"
8.5
9.5
I*idh R$lorolion
To accelerate the r€covery ofthe anadmmous fish runs, the transport and planting ofchinook and and coho salmon
juveniles by helicopter to the middle and upper ElwlB River mainstem and lributaries is Fopos€d. The outplanting
Olympic National Park
600 East Park Avenue
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
ENWRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTIoT the INTERIM MANAGEMENT of the OLD
ELWIU RESORT SITE
Prepared for
National Park Service
Port Angeles, Washington
Prepared by
.Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation
12100 NE l95th Street, Suite 200 * Bothell, WA 98011
Pbone: 425 / 482-7600 Fax: 425 I 482-7 652
December, 200I
CONTENTS
I . PURPOSE AND NEED I - I
I.I PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION I-I
1.2 DECISION TO BE MADE I4
I.3 SCOPING I.5
I.4 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION I-5
I.5 APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS I.5
2. ALTERNATIVES 2-I
2.I ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT ELIMINATED FROM DETAILED STUDY 2-I
2.1.1 Altemative A - Donate the Site 2-l
2.2 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED IN DETAIL 2-I
2.2.1 Ahemative I - No Action, Secure and Maintain the Site 2-l
2.2.2 Altemative 2 - Proposed Action, Natural Resource Restoratiot 2-2
2.2.3 Altemative 3 - Renovation and Reconstruction 2-2
2.2.4 Summary Comparison of Alternatives 2-3
3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 3.I
3.I PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY 3-I
3.1.1 Affected EnYironment 3- l
Page I of55
1. PURPOSE AND NEED
This chapter discusses the purpose of, and the underlying need for, determining the short-term
disposition and management of the site where the old Elwha Resort is located. This
Environmental Assessment (EA) documents the environmental impact analysis and evaluates
any effects that may result fiom implementing the altematives. Chapter I describes the decision
to be made, the scoping activities, and the issues associated with managing the site. Figure l-1
shows the project area and the surrounding lands.
1.1 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION
The Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act (the Elwha Act) of 1992 authorized
the Secretary ofthe Interior to acquire tlle Elwha and Glines Canyon hydroelectric projects,
including project works and appurtenant lands, and to firlly restore the river's ecosystem and
native anadromous fisheries. In February 2000, the federal govemment acquired the
hydroelectric projects including 1,061 acres ofland associated with the Elwha Hydroelectric
Project and outside the Olympic National Park (Park) boundary. These lands surround Lake
Aldwell and include the area leased by the old Elwha Resort.
The old Elwha Resort is located on Highway l0l, just east ofthe Elwha River Bridge (Figure 1-
1). Built in the 1920s. the resort once provided gasoline, a convenience store, rental cabins, and
campsites. The gas station, store, and campground closed a number of years ago. Several
permanent residents continued to live in the cabins and trailers at the resort until the leasehold
rights were purchased by the federal govemment in August 2000. The residents were relocated
with federal assistance under the Uniform Relocation Act. The old Elwha Resort included a
number of structures, including a main lodge, seven cabins, a trailer-home, a workshed, a bath
house, and a "boathouse" historically used to inllate rafts and innertubes (Figure l-2). North of
the core structures, the site also included a small picnic structure adjacent to the river and a boat
launch. A survey occurred during September 2001 to determine the site's value as a historic
property. The survey concluded that the site should be eligible for inclusion on the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP). However, on September 7, 2001 the mair lodge and
workshop bumed to the gound during the early moming hours as a result of arson.
Figure 1-1. OLD ELWHA RESORT VICINITY
(click on image for an enlargement in a new window)
Figure 1-2. OLD ELWHA RESORT SITE MAP
(click on image for an enlargement in a new window)
Page 4 of55
COVER LETTER
Changes:
. Removes interest in fines
. Changes the timing ofthe inquiry into ability to pay from revocation to sentencing. Defines
ability to pay
RCW 10.01.160(3) has stated before 1991 : The court shall notordera defendant to pay
costs unless the defendant is or will be able to pay them. ln determining the amount and
method of payment of costs, the court shall take account ofthe financial resources of
the defendant and the nature of the burden that payment of costs will impose.
2018 amendment:
Removed the 12% annual interest
(3) The court shall not order a defendant to pay costs u{ ,eas !I the defendant is-or++ll-be
ag,e+e+ay+Aem at the time of sentencinq is indioent as defined in RCW 10.'101.010(3) (a)
throuqh (c). ln determining the amount and method of payment of costs for defendants who are
not indioent as defined ln 10.101.010{31 (a) throuqh (cl , the court shall take account of the
financial resources of the defendant and the nature of the burden that payment of costs will impose
Costs
Mandatory costs: statutorily mandated costs such as restitution, DNA fee, crime victim
penalty fee, criminal filing fee.
Discretionary costs: fines, attorney fees, court costs, deferred prosecution costs, pretrial
supervision costs, FTA warrant costs, incarceration costs, etc.
The statutory inquiry required with regard to a defendant's ability to pay costs is required
only for discretionary legal financial obligations (LFO)State v. Clark (2015) 191
Wash.Aoo.369 , 362 P.3d 309
"Washington long has recognized fines and costs as representing
different obligations. For instance, the definition of "legal financial
obligation" under the Sentencing Reform Act means a sum of money
that is ordered by a superior court of the state of Washington for legal
financial obligations which may include restitution to the victim,
statutorily imposed crime victims' compensation fees as assessed
pursuant to RCW 7.68.035, court costs, county or interlocal drug
funds, court-appointed attorneys'fees, and costs of defense, fines,
and any other financial obligation that is assessed to the offender as
20t7
.Clallam 1 D
...Port Angeles M
...sequim M
CNT AH
41L 77
488 0
188 0
TI
5075
486
173
NTI
48
2t
5
DUI
68
77
8
CT
381
137
101
F
0
1
0
P
31
1
0
Total
7 ,162
1,205
475
Tickets
5,154
508
778
Criminal
860
596
297
Jurisdiction
8t%
t4%
5v"
0
0
2
0
0
8,842
Court Work Load
c SC
1 1
Civil
7,t4A88%
9%
3%
46%
38%
16%
5,840
66%
1,8s3
2L%
F
0
0
0
P
32
2
0
Jurisdiction
82%
L2Yo
5%
2016
.Clallam 1D
...Port Angeles M
...Sequim M
TI
5016
415
155
NTI
50
15
6
DUI
109
49
72
CT
328
88
97
CNT
457
508
196
AH
72
0
0
Total
7 ,757
7,077
466
Tickets
5,098
432
151
Criminal
894
645
305
c
98s
0
0
0
0
8,700
Court Work Load
SC
081
Civil
1,1659OYo
8%
3%
48%
3SYo
L7lo
5,691
65%
1,844
2L%
1,16s
L3%
F
4
0
0
P
33
0
I
Jurisdiction
84%
to%
6%
NTI
95
20
1
AH
93
0
0
c
25
0
0
2015
.Clallam 1D
...Port Angeles M
...Sequim M
TI
s3 28
375
186
DUI
tt7
44
8
CT
296
88
88
CNT
495
450
270
Total
7 ,826
977
554
Tickets
5,456
39s
188
Criminal
909
582
365
9,357
Court Work Load
L 5
Civil
L,46t90%
7%
3%
49%
3t%
20%
6,039
65%
t,857
20%
t,457
t5%
F
0
I
1
P
65
2
0
Jurisdiction
80%
t4%
6%
AH
87
0
0
c
02
0
0
sc
775
0
0
20\4
.Clallam 1 D
...Port Angeles M
...Sequlm M
TI
4901
543
174
NTI
93
22
7
DUI
119
4\
11
CT
3(X
116
95
CNT
474
569
2t4
Tota I
7,248
1,294
502
Tickets
5,060
567
181
Criminal
897
726
320
9,044
Court Work Load
1 9
Civil
L,29187%
t0%
3%
46%
37%
t6%
5,808
54%
L,943
2t%
L,297
L4%
F
0
3
1
Jurisdiction
78%
tSYo
7Yo
AHC
106 903
00
00
NTI
47
20
4
CNT
496
667
267
2013
.Clallam I D
...Port Angeles M
...Sequlm M
TI
5190
529
203
DUI
tt6
60
10
CT
209
128
r25
Total
7,203
1,407
611
Tickets
5,237
549
207
Criminal
821
855
402
0
0
9,221
Court Work Load
SC
071
Civil
1,14587%
9%
3%
40Yo
47%
79%
s,993
65%
2,078
23%
r,14s
t2%
Tl=Traffic lnfractio n, NTI=NonTraffic tnfraction, DUI=Oriving Under lnfl uence, CT=Criminal Traffic, CNT=Criminal Non
5 qe A t/a-
CcAtur,.a. =?.A. :
SEo. :
Traffi c, AH=AntlHarrasment
Cerq, nr p.r- oorl .
)
l"
C=Civil, SC=Small Claims, F=Felony Complalnt, p=parking
4s. e
3c. s
t7,7
950
1,148
L3%
sc
109
0
0
P
29
0
1
Cumrn Cot rry
Loc.lo$.rLo.|t Pr.6.ti..l
lrontt 20Og t ontr, 2010 forllry 2ol r
Tot t Toi.t Tot l
Montity 2013 Montiy 2ola Mmti! m15
Tot t Tot t Tot t
lrsrlrt 2016 Mmlr'ty 2017 Monf yTotl Tot r Tolltlh!
tlonhty 2012
103 r0
1 497,725
901 913 99
37 @3 47
17371529
11529
939.007 116
Cl.ll.m Co Dilhci Cou.r I
14,180 70
18,U117
18,38497
15,22003
17 210 97
17.21102
ta.oao57
14,0€a l5
17,519 U
17,422 54
17 fi? ',19
155672
4,2f2 69
2,561!4
0@535
3 747 4
0,21544
6.051 77
6,1906
5,071 45
0 753 59
r 301 55
3 821 0o
4.90345
8,14212 46,54080 27,56025
8 S€6 09 5054r2a 30,a64 34
13 5a569 63 6a2 21 3503563
7.106 73 50 AO2 64 27,16108
194.81
255 79
27155
207 @
255 09
24113
242 20
277 24
25180
251 a9
247 U
s.912 05
0.276 04
1o,3f3 76
7.915 ?1
9378@
10,360 09
9,902 a5
10.26281
10,064 59
I 667 o8
I571.20
I 426 e6
'13,71024
744ei,2
r865S.73
0,915 38
14.4361i
12,7aaa3
11 6aO 26
12,350 54
10,41!83
11.305 88
10,20541
11,816 9e
8,0034A
4,*3 52
1094158
651323
9,837 5a
6,831 20
6,472 93
7 5212l
5.816 00
6,662 g2
6,58665
4,f3120
10501
52 A2
1aB 8a
05 09
136 0a
10t r5
t0204
109 26
60 55
ot 48
82 23
93 05
12A145
8Se 38
2.175 26
-rx192
70{ 51
1 14307
896 51
1.1e? 23
1,O22 $
I tr22 tN
0@ 08
$7 5a
5,3S3 05
1081e7 92
2U,74171
219.U5 77
232.255 8a
199,50751
n)7 a2a 0l
219,70a3a
213451it
4 31128
1S3340
2U 55136
217 597 16
21r7SO8e r€635675 15O.O5e 92 161.5.441 169,06391 14A358.8
207_70260 1?5039eD 216,72455 195.1Aa 14 167,30595 1652at51
237,1/407 159.206 69 180.629 8A r7033710 r018a587 1!7 6€0 71
167,931a7 1A7_14 a2 r78022@ 160.53 a6 156.95! 19 165.17276
i67 03.63 i6A 10675 160.f,16 i'C 179.753 23 15a.S9-2 56 1a5015!a
218.561.3 19a g9O ra 1{O,O|O23 r7e33650 102.820 0€ 180,16a516,0743! 16O.0a2 S 172.5472 172 aga8',. r576129a 16A79Aal
170,04448 l971aa33 i06717 08 18a,305 oO 16a,Aal65 150,e53 3718525A70 r0516711 15656913 170,73091 157,56587 162025a916!75395 16a4747' 166.10648 171,a7192 157.25281 lSToaaAO15945001 157.521616 162,1573e 1/r531a66 r1813030 ra88372a
14a,346 $ 150,222 61 13a.527 fi r57 aA| 5.1 r53 a62 92 145,$5 /4
Y..r End Y.r End ys Eid y..r End y..r Errd y.r Eid
.230.7ar 88 2,iiO 18a26.200i 15495 2 GO2a7 99 r 88O.€(B 97 2,@1.8t92a '
151240 22 144,O75 A3
167.1346a 152,64710
1&.7W@ 1*2253'
150,77353 ,rL 807 32r75.2!53 17r,5it500
lal.2@50 170s5 65
107.00519 173 755 65
1eo 22a 05 i5a om 77
15060a a8 1@ 62 a5
15126094 1A1,63171
132,300a7 126,011@
129.79867 132106 5!
Y..r Eid Y..r Ed
.!25 56 02 I,097.725 65
€,565 '-u 47
1713171
.5.$621
-3,720 27
21.74526
5 860
-31
6.926 66
4,761 93
10.69013
5 3€2 84
I 342 SO
g 732 00
a.22A 93
5,205 77
00.117 07
*.72161
54,592t 99
52,944 80
52 9t0 94
52 084 50
4028529
41 505 06
33 060 54
33.92331
4t,276 €
45.495 65
u,622 61
31 933 06
31 150 33
29 4U 42
3.341 oa
4,15002
4 865 41
:r.168 7a
3.522 A
217,12A I
19e,51156
215 501 64
222 *17'1
2r3,89766
212 f5515
214,42671 2't4,15977
21634943 188 130 50
170 A3l eO 172 076 36
203 5@42 105 393 25
YoaT EM Y..T E ,
2,W 12
3.229 7A
3 025 85
4 055 16
2,157
10 342
5 294 47
2.696 84
Tor.t 1,367.a30 87 @a,7a3 6E
11
2015
33.858 29 06,01009 626,81
YTD Courl
YIO County R.v.nLr€ trom R6mtt ics Prob.ton
3611305.t .00121 S 8687. t8863e0
?r'AvG t61OO7O I S rga4O5 t 8667s t895153
11
115117 28 86aA17. 1,2ciJ1A 12,f51 31o21 .€5.117 70 200,6AA 57 2,928 70 62,e532e 112,5n I 41,70f 75 2,5e1,U1 1g 2,a3t,a915. 2 -27 7@ 17
YTD Iour Grc.! Rorxtt nc. R.qu€ (ndu&! Ct.lllh Cordy Cn,
YIO Locar (nclud6. Chltrm Cdrniy, Cny o, Pon An!Et.! .nd S.quim
YIO Olhor Local tAlr ot|.r roc€rtund. mdudld m YTo Lo4t,
YIO PEbston Clallao County. City ol Pon Ang.b. .nd s.qurh
YTO Sr.rG .nd Otld
ot Pon ancaL. ..d s.quim)
""'ol.pur€ r€!6luton. tro lns! or Mo .nh.! .r. ncludod rn @Mt toclt but nol gN6n cEdit in Ed.n, but 906! to sup.no. cn
Revenue Analysis estimate based upon new law etrmrnafino ffO,s for tnolqent partef
2011
2016
r 6ts.7a,a s
ror.lCljlmt
PA SEO R.v.nu6 -
206 689 , 6d.rs2 teol.ola'
(70100)1, I (oomq
:
rT roi 5 yr Avo % ol mmrl.r c!r.to.d
111573
3
2.U2@
2,573 47
3,50373
2,619 32
3159 06
2.437 1a
2,7A7 *
2,651 @
2,726 63
3,1997S
214324
2 49a 56
{5.67894
52.640 94
63.839 38
17,2021f
53aasA5
55 072 9a
5a 7A 23
50,058 A
51 05e 5a
53 372 48
37,509.7A
a2 @8 71
103.40a 5a
114,73364
144,53101
107,73086
123 644,r4
12a.n3f 'l
120.834t1
111,057 58
117,020 01
'118,392 71
84 565 26
9',1 211 1O
20t?
.Clallam 1 D
...Port Angeles M
...Sequim M
CNT AH
4LL 77
488 0
188 0
TI
5075
486
L73
NTI
48
27
5
DUI
58
7!
8
CT
381
737
101
F
0
1
0
P
31
1
0
Total
7 ,162
7,205
475
Tickets
5,154
508
778
Criminal
860
696
297
Jurisdiction
8t%
t4%
5%
0
0
8,842
Court Work Load
c sc
9 50
Civil
1,148L2t
0
0
8a%
9Yo
3%
46%
38%
l6Yo
5,840
65%
1,853
2t%
L,t48
tt%
P
32
2
0
Jurisdiction
a7%
L2%
5%
2016
.Clallam I D
...Port Angeles M
...Sequlm M
TI
5016
4L5
155
NTI
50
15
6
DUI
109
49
12
CT
328
88
97
CNT
457
508
195
AH
72
0
0
csc
985 108
00
00
F
0
0
0
Tota I
7 ,L57
L,O77
466
Tickets
5,098
432
161
Criminal
894
645
305
8,700
Court Work Load
Civil
1,16590%
8%
3%
48%
35%
77%
5,591
65%
1,165
tt%
P
33
0
1
Jurisdiction
84%
LO%
6%
2015
.Clallam 1 D
...Port Angeles M
...Sequim M
Total
7,826
977
554
Tickets
5,456
395
188
Criminal
909
582
366
F
4
0
0
Court Work Load
Civil
t,46190%
7%
3%
49Yo
31%
20%
6,039
65%
1,857
20%
P
66
2
0
Jurisdiction
s0%
1.4%
6%
NTI
93
22
7
CT
304
116
95
CNT
474
s59
274
AHC
87 tO2
00
00
2014
.Clallam 1 D
...Port Angeles M
...Sequim M
TI
4901
543
174
Total
7 ,248
L,294
502
Tickets
5,060
567
181
Criminal
897
726
320
9,O44
Court Work Load
SC
9 1
Civil
7,29775
0
0
87Yo
LO%
3Yo
46/o
37%
l6Yo
5,808
64%
r,943
2t%
r,29t
t4%
P
29
0
1
Jurisdiction
78%
L5%
7%
NTI
47
20
4
2013
.clallam 1D
...Port Angeles M
...Sequim M
TI
5190
529
203
DUI
116
60
10
CT
209
128
125
CNT AH C
496 106 90
66700
26700
F
0
3
1,
Total
7 ,203
t,407
611
Tickets
5,237
549
207
Criminal
821
855
402
9,221
Court Work Load
SC
3
Civil
1,14587Yo
9Yo
3Yo
4OYo
47Yo
L9Yo
2,078
2t%
1,745
t2%
to7
0
0
= lrafr c lnfraction, NTl.NonTraffic lnfraction, DUI=Driving Under lnfluence, CT=Criminal Traffic, CNT=Criminal NonTraffic, AH=AntiHarrasment
5 gA AtJ6, Cct,'^.,"rrr- 6otr./
Cc6 r.art = 4s.r ?o
?.A. : 3L,s ?o
S €4. -= t1' 7 ?u
C=Civil, SC=Small Claims, F=Felony Complaint, P=ParkinB
7,844
2t%
TI NTI DUI CT CNT AH C SC
5328 95 Lt7 296 496 93 1255 109
37520 44 88 450 0 0 0
185 1888270000
9,357 L,457
16%
DUI
119
4t
11
F
0
1
1
5,993
65%
Cl,llrn Coudy
locd otrrocd Pmbnioir
Montu 200€ irollhly 2010 Monrry 20rl rao.lrny 2or2 uonrit 2ol3 rloltrry 201a ito.'t{y 2015k *,2010Mmr y 2017fmflyTolrl Tolll Toll Toll Totc Totrl Totll Tol.l loll Tot i Th.
1.497 725 05
901S13 99
37 993 4T
1737'15 29
784103 10
930,007 46
'173.71529
CLlLm Co ollnd C@n r
103,401 5€
114,733 6/t
144 531 o1
107 730 86j23E,0!4
1212e3 71
12683891
111.057 58
117,020 01
11a,302 77
81.565 2E
91,21410
2,U2 @
2.513 47
3.503 73
2.61932
3 159 06
283713
2 747 $
2 651 06
2 72d63
319S 79
2.443 28
2,4U *
19481
259 79
27155
207 @
255 09
24143
242 20
277 21
251 a9
251 8S
217 04
227 29
5,272 69
2.57 3
6,00535
3,78746
6.2158€
6,051 77
6,19086
5,971 45
6,7535e
4,391 55
3,82190
4,903 45
6912 05 124715
880 38
217bm-tlt 02
704 51
i 14307
846 51
1 1e7 23
1,622 44
1 322 00
600 68
937 58
1* ae| e2
2t27at 7'l
219!.577
212 255 4
199 507 51
207.828 91
21970t *
21345155
21a.159 n
1AA 136 50
172,Of836
165.30325
Y..r En!
2 433.481 56
211r*&
207 702 @
23714a07
167 90r a7
167 034 63
214.56143
1*67a 33
170 0l,1,B
1a5,258 70
16t 753 95
159,45801
144,346 33
2,2&,fa18E
106,356 76
175,83060
18S26 69
167 14t 12
1641d875
1e4 490 14
160 042 0A
19718433
105.16711
157 546 16
1&.22261
2 110,108 26
1512422
ta713a6
,ao 790 66
150.773 5!t
175.265 36
1ag,M*
187.69519
11x,.224 6
159.@a aa
151.2@ 94
132.9t 47
129.70l67
1.??5.50df2
144 675 03
154.6a710
1s'22537
141,807 32
171.545 ('9
r70 s5 a5
173 755 65
t5a ao3 r/
1C2 G2 45
l6t Gritl 71
126.0 6
t3a.ao5 51
Y..r End
1.E97,725 05
€.5651.u 107
17,44 71
.5.662r
3.7m27
21,765?6
5,&O aA
-31.320 2g
2,457 97
44,540 60 27,560 25
5o,5ir4 24 30,4€4 34
63.04221.35.03563
50,802 64, 27,10100
60,117 07 33.060 54
zt 3ta 26 234,554 66
1,933rr0 2175O71€
5 393 05 247 128 08
3 341 o0 199 511 56
415402.215,5e1e4
1E6511 222.E€,{11
4.10E78 2r3.E9706
3,52282 212.75515
2.W 12 210.4e 71
3.22e74 214.y913
3,025 a5 170,634 00
4.055 16 200,508 a2
Y..r End
44.707 75 2 5e1,U1 1E
150,451s2 1ar,sa,a a3
216,72455 195,r8814
180,429S 170,33710
t70@200 1@,632t6
ieo 908.29 i79 7i1.23
153 07023 r79 336 50
1725/!672 1721tvU
166,71788 18a,305 @
156 569.t3 170,73091
164l8aaa 171.47192
102,15739 145,31a8A
134,52790 157,40751
Y6.rErr Y6$ Erd
2 @1 jU $ 2 cagfl7 q
160,63 ol 1116 356 44
167,305 95 165.255 51
161,@5 87 197.08071
156,05610 165,172 76
154 SA2 5A 165,01516
162 820 9a 180,1685
157,O12U 1U79911
16a.6ztl 65 154,953 37
157.565 87 162 025 a9
157,25261 107 G6 60
118,130 30
'aa
8!t7 2a
153.a62 92 rir5 565 rra
Y..r End Y..r E.d
I ,849,633 97 2,001 930 2a
9.276 U.
10.37376
7.91571.
9.378 00
soP
f672167
5€.504 9t
52,96,a 80
52 9t0 04
52 084 50
ao2852e
,al 505 06
33,023 31
35.276 48
35,405 65
31e22 0',1
31 933 0€
3t 15033
29,444 42
10.349 09
9,902 A5
10,26281
10.064 59
9,667 0A
9.574 20
8.826 96
10 362
€ 290
206 6aa 57
I (r13.2fi) a
73 177 t 112lll l6a.5ol B.loc Coneld.uon
02.95329 112.5n fi
lndigent Parties
l
1,206 48 12.75131
2 696 A4
-27 7AA 1?rorli 13€7,430.87 €oa,74 6A 33,EalE 29 96olo69 62681a.21 3a5la770
YTO Tot l G.o.. R.fllt nc€ R.v.nu.(ncrud.. cl.llEm colnry, cily ot Pon an!€r63 and
YTO Locrl (nclud.! Clall'm Counry, CIy ot Pon An!.|.. snd S6qurm
YTO Orh6r Locll (Ari oth.r loc.llund! inclldod in YTD Local)ylo Pmbaion cl.ll.m couniy, city ot P6n Arig6t63 rnd s6quim
YIO Courl
vTD Counly R6v6nue,.om R.mft.nos. PoDa[on
702 924
Revenue Analysis estimate based upon new law eliminaling LFO'S for] ] f.*,"*-,C,cIEm PA sEo Rsv.nJ.20171 tooa inr I zm6sels earazll rcorers' ,o,ui Lu,, .r. , ,ro,r, ] ' '^ ^- ]' '--- --- 'l "'" .,,^""1::l::::,: l:.::l:::,:l]#::
(i.6.00o).4 (70 ro0)., t (.00 000).
,78 t yr Av9 % ol cnhrn.l c.Elodd
rololulEn two ling3 o. iso snln.. .16 lncludod in 4mnt rocllbll not grvon crodn ir Edsn. but oo6s lo Sup€nor Cn
' LFOS onry '
45,87a 06
52.0a4 94
03.E3t 3a
47,20217
53 445 65
55 972 00
5a 786 2l
50 054 86
51,959 fla
53.372 44
37.56S 76
42.008 71
8,11212
8.56 99
13,54569
7.r6 73
6.920 66
6,761 93
10,69013
5.362 84
0,342 m
I 732 00
122493
52c]5f7
ta.18o 70
1a.3ztl 17
10,3Aa 97
15.220 03
17,21097
17,21102
18,9,a057
18,9E415
17,5a85a
17,422 5^
17,50719
15,50072
105 01
52 e2
14844
95 99
136 04
10915
10204
10€2a
8o 55
01 4A
a2 23
03 05
13,71020 8,@3 a6
7 ,1,!9 12 1,83 52
18,65873 10,04154
s,9153a 6,51323
1rr,8t611 9,837 54
12,74483 6,43120,
1 1 6aO.26 8,a72 93
12 3g 51 7 .41 21
1o4t9.83 5,a16AO
1 1 305.0A 0 662 A2
10295,{1 6,5€6 65
1161609 0,73i 20
115147.20 6 4a174
L