The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About512-514 W. 9th Street 512-514 W gth Street CUP 15-04 CITY. OF OIRT NGELES U.S.POSTAGE>>PITNEY BOWES P -A '-:T �15 07 04, W A S H I N G T,O N, U. S. A. P:t 2 $ (D(D(O.481 ZIP 9836 P. O. BOX 1150 .02 1IN PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON 98362-0217 00013688040CT 07. 2015� John Dailey 519 W 1 St Port A eles, WA 98362 N'I X-,I*'E* � 11- in Dailey W 1 01 S t A /elestWA 98362 RETURN TO SEADER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO � FORWARD 13S3,6Z0Z:1.T-S;(3 1,7..Z-E;--ezzz3-e77 .-4t CITY OF PORT ANGELES NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on October 1, 2015, the CITY OF PORT ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT received an application to permit the creation of a duplex by combining two existing parcels and two existing structures in the Residential Single Family RS-7 zone. The application was determined to be complete on October 1, 2015. Interested parties are encouraged to cornment on the proposal and to attend the public hearing that will be conducted on OCTOBER 28, 2015, at 1:00 PM, City Hall, 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, Washington. Written comment must be submitted no later than OCTOBER 20, 2015., to be included in the staff report on this matter. Verbal testimony will be taken during the public hearing. Information may be reviewed at the City Department of Community & Economic Development, City Hall, P.O. Box 1150, 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles. City Hall is accessible to persons with disabilities. Interested parties are invited to attend the meeting. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT: It is anticipated that a Determination of Non Sigrificance (DNS) will be issued per WAC 197-11-355 for the project following the public comment review period that will end on October 20, 2015. APPLICANT: Karen Brandstroni LOCATION: 512/514 W. 9"' Street For further information contact: Scott K. Johns (360) 417-4752 PUB: October 7,2015 POST: October 5,2015 MAIL: October 5,2015 CITY OF PORT ANGELES *** CUSTOMER RECEIPT *** Oper:,ACYGANOW Type: CT Drawer: I Date:�10/01/15 01 Receipt no: 94182 Year Number Amount 2015 26 PZ PLANNING & ZONING $850.00 Trans number: 1832373 CREATE DUPLEX FROM 2 SFR AND COMBINE Tender detail CK CHECK 1356 $850.00 Total tendered $850.00 Total payment $850.00 Trans date: 10/01/15 Time: 8:34:27 ***THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT*** FOR INGUIRIES-360-457-0411 PRESS I WVW.CITYOFPA.US Filing Fee: *$ 350.00 ORT ,kNGELES Admin. $ 125.00 P I, WASHINGTON, U. S. A. CITY OF PORT ANGELES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: Chapter 43.21C RCW the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. The purpose of this review is to provide information to help you and the reviewing agency identify impacts that may result from your proposal and to identify methods to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal if they exist. The review will help the agency decide whether further information is necessary or whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is necessary. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Answer each question to the best of your knowledge with the most precise information known. Provide the best descriptions you can. In most cases you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply (N/A). Complete answers to the questions will avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems please ask the City Department of Community & Economic Development employees to assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to phase them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. If phasing is proposed, please provide that information in Item 11, the description section. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects and include a site map. BACKGROUND 1. Name of project: A. Address or general location of site: 1,2 - 61q C1 7 j�7 2. Name, address, phone number, and e-mail address (if available) of applicantf J-6-0/C,C_ Z i-("A 4-�-�1-om PC,CL, k a ve,�A -5 J �a�n��q �,_q 4- q Iq 3. Name, address, phone number, and e-mail address (if available) of contact person if other than applicant:-pl-c-p W�icz-, b La_tl� kkl 43d quU,, 3-6uLu 5 Ic ve4i 4. Date checklist prepared: I 's i a016 5. Age*��ing checklist: CITY OF PORT ANGELES Environmental Checklist EVALUATIONFOR, Page 2 AGENCY USE 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): / �/7 ffxt�t,- A. What is the long term objective of this proposal? B. How does this project relate to long-term plans? 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. i;ij //1 Oedu-X4 "--mad-e- 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: Y/A- 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? Alp If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed h for your proposal, if known. UJ4 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) C,�V 6L,�,e �(_ -0 h e, "61 e,� +o h.0- 0-" re-l"I V c J-La P ta- lv� Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR P '�e 3 a AGENCY USE 112. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. �sj �L_ ,Sjqojqt�._ 6ee- e�:ib-JA PROJECT SPECIFIC ACTIONS: Complete this section if your proposal involves a project specific action such as a subdivision, new construction, a new or expanding business, a site specific rezone (not area-wide), a conditional use permit, a shoreline permit, or similar action: ENVIRONMENT 1. Earth A _N General description of the site (circle one): (flat) rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other B. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Alu-h C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. kr)P0 D. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. E. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any Filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill: F. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. A/0 Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 4 AGENCY USE G. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? H. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 4/64�.� 2. Air A. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. B. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. /V0 C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. Water A. Surface water: i.) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Mo ii.) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. AIV iii.) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material: 0AU, iv.) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/0-n-b EP vironmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 5 AGENCY USE v.) Does the proposal lie within a 1 00-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. D&-K� k h no vi.) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NV B. Ground water: i.) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. yo ii.) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the Ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing chemicals; agricultural wastes; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. 1�rh t'� C. Water Runoff(including storm water): i.) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will the water flow into other waters? If so, describe.- - 90t &'-'5 Ma� '�LVA o�-� w'rol V*C�r- 9 &dk'1"5 la� ii.) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? /VO If so, generally describe how and what. k!n1j, D. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if anyjla" Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 6 AGENCY USE 4. Plants A. Check or circle the type of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other — .'everareen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs — grass pasture crop or grainTr tot .4 re-t-�- wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation B. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ffb-,� C. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. 5. Animals A. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other B. Threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. �JMJL, C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. �/o D. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. �Mtx, 6. Energy and Natural Resources A. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Khnc, Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 7 AGENCY USE B. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. 7. Environmental Health A. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NO i) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N ii) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. B. Noise i) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? ii) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 5 MU-4 — we e-14-lei vy)it "I/L- iii) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use A. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? A6,5, 'L� B. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. t��k4L&o C. Describe any structures on the sitej"a_�e__)'�5i-a4 , '-a4"L'k' D. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? A/0 E. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 'RO -7 Environmental Checklist EVALUATION,FM Page 8 AGENCY USE F. What is the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the site? tiz G. What is the current Shoreline Master Program designation of the site? Drk_�kllA�,O H. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. 4L"O 1. How many people would reside or work in the completed project? Lix-i B�Urm ( I �_ �L 73 aAlri-m J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 1\1 t–pu— K. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: L Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9. Housing A. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? /)- – " -ex�t�– Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. -M-e�e . B. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? NO-o-J, Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 9 AGENCY USE 10. Aesthetics A. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) prop osed? �()Ood -roo�-,il q B. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. 11. Light and Glare A. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?— B. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? A/0 C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Mpu_ D. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. 12. Recreation A. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? ffo--n,(_ B. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. A/0 C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. 0-4 Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 10 AGENCY USE 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation A. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe: 4(0 B. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. &-�� C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. Transportation A. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. qt� B. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate'2 /W-7� D. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate either public or private). No E. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N 9-vq-, F. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. /VM Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page AGENCY USE G. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. A/�-40--- 15. Public Services A. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example?: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. N 0 B. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities A Circle utilities currently available at the site: -Y �one- eele icij-)�rnatural gas,Lw/ate' r,(t�.fuse service,, telie c'ric�sewer, septic system, other. sanitary B. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 17. Economics A. If the proposal will result in expansion of an existing business, please describe the nature of the expansion: (e.g., additional land and/or buildings, new equipment, new employees). Mo B. If the proposal is the creation of a new business, please describe (e.g., re-use of an existing building and site, construction of a new building). /VV C. Describe if the proposal is the first of its type in the community, or what the similar uses are. � - (-6,�-!z e-1, Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 12 AGENCY USE D. How many people will the proposal provide employment for at its completion and what types of jobs will be created (e.g., sales clerks, factory workers, etc.)? (Jobs created by the construction of the proposal should be reported separately.) E. Where will the materials, goods or services utilized by the proposal come from? L uAY�b,4- hli- F. Where will the goods or services produced by the proposal be utilized? 'yo IV C-- G. Who will utilize the goods or services produced by the proposal? lvd r)U H. Will the proposal alter the tax assessments of the area? Dnt Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 13 AGENCY USE Endangered Species Act (ESA) Supplemental Checklist Answer to the best of your knowledge. This checklist was developed to help project proponents and government agencies identify when a project needs further analysis regar'ding potential adverse effects on Endangered Species as required by the Endangered Species Act (ESA). For our purposes, "ESA listed species" are any species listed as endangered, threatened, or being considered for listing. This supplemental checklist is for all development within ESA Potential Impact Areas, which include the following locations: • Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) designated floodplain and/or floodway areas; • Riparian Buffer Zones (RBZ) as described by the Dept of Natural Resources 2007 stream typing system and WDFW's 1997 stream buffer guidelines; and/or • Channel Migration Zones (CMZ) plus 50' as identified according to Dept of Ecology 2003). If ESA listed species are present or ever were present within the ESA Potential Impact Area where your project will be located, your project has the potential for affecting them, and you must comply with the ESA. The questions in this section will help determine if your proposed project could have an impact. The Port Angeles regional watershed is an area where several endangered species have historically been present. Please answer the following questions to the best of your knowledge to assist the city in determining if your project will have adverse impacts to ESA species or their habitats. Port Angeles Community and Economic Development Department staff can provide technical assistance in answering the following questions in this checklist. If necessary, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) regional office can also provide information to help you answer these questions. PROJECT SPECIFICS: The questions in this section are specific to the project and vicinity. 1. Do you know of any endangered species or WDFW priority species on or in the vicinity of your project? /IVO If yes, identify those species. Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR, Page 14 AGENCY USE 2. Name of waterbody nearest to your project: 'jX4ttU)&.�ej- 3. What is the distance from your project to the nearest body of water? I rn;ie_, oreej< &0 0 Often a buffer between the project and a stream can reduce the chance of a negative impact to fish. 4. What is the current land use adjacent to the potentially affected water body (developed including commercial, parking lots, residential, paved andlor graveled surfaces, agriculture, forestry, Re etc)?. 5. What is the predominant vegetative cover between the project and the potentially affected water body (dense forest, woodland, scrub, grasses,etc)? r-a 6. Is the project above a barrier to fish passage: • natural permanent barrier (waterfall) Yes No • natural temporary barrier (beaver pond)Yes No • human-made barrier(culvert, dam) Yes— No & • other: Yes— No • (explain): If you answered yes to the questions above, describe the barrier and source of information- 7. If you answered yes to question 6 above, are there any 7 resident salmonid populations above the blockage? ,/Yes— No Don't know 8. What percent of the project will be impervious surface (including pavement & roof area)? Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 15 AGENCY USE FISH MIGRATION: The questions in this section will help determine if this project could interfere with the migration of adult and juvenile fish. (Both increases and decreases in water fiows can affect fish migration.) 1. Does the project require the withdrawal of: i. Surface water? Yes No Amount Name of surface water body ii. Ground water? Yes No Amount From where Depth of well (If you answered yes to any of the above questions, you will need to contact the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Washington Department of Ecology to obtain appropriate approvals) 2. Will any water be rerouted? Yes No If yes, will this require a channel relocation? Yes No Please describe: 3. Will there be retention or detention ponds? Yes Nol If you answer yes, will this be an infiltration pond or a sur6ce discharge to either a municipal storm water system or a surface water body? Yes No If you answer "yes" to a surface water discharge, please give the name of the waterbody that will receive the discharge: 4. Will this project require the building of any temporary or permanent roads? Yes No (Increased road distance may affect the timing of water reaching a stream and may impact fish habitat.) 5. Are any new or replacement culverts or bridges proposed as part of this project? Yes No X 6. Will topography changes affect the duration/direction of runoff flows? Yes No Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR, Page 16 AGENCY USE If yes, describe the changes: 7. Will the project involve any placement of fill within the ESA Potential Impact Area? Yes — No 1k If you answered yes, describe expected impacts on flood storage and/or flood conveyance and how these impacts will either be avoided or mitigated: WATER QUALITY: The questions in this section will help determine if this project could adversely impact water quality for either surface or groundwater. Such impacts can cause problems for listed species. (Water quality can be made worse by runoff from impervious surfaces, altering water temperature, discharging contaminants, etc.) 1. Do you know of any problems with water quality in any of the streams within ESA Potential Impact Areas? Yes No � (Information on impaired water bodies can be obtained from' Washington Department of Ecology) If you answered yes, describe: 2. Will your project either reduce or increase shade along or over a waterbody? Yes— No—:"\ (Removal of shading vegetation or the building of structures such as docks or floats often result in a change in shade). If you answered yes, please describe: 3. Will the project introduce any nutrients or other contaminants (fertilizers, other waste discharges, or storm water runoff) to the waterbody? Yes No V 4. Will turbidity be introduced to a water body by construction of the project or during operation of the project? Yes— No (In-water or near water work will often increase turbidity.) If you answered yes, consult with Washington Department of Ecology to ensure compliance with water quality regulations. Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 17 AGENCY USE 5. Will your project require long term maintenance that could affect water quality in the future, e.g., bridge cleaning, highway salting, chemical sprays for vegetation management, clearing of parking lots? Yes No If yes, please describe: VEGETATION: The following questions are designed to determine if the project will affect riparian vegetation, thereby, adversely impacting salmon. 1 . Will the project involve the removal of any vegetation from the stream banks? Yes— No \i If you answered yes, please describe the existing conj7it-i-6n\s, and the amount and type of vegetation to be removed: If any vegetation is removed from a riparian area, a mitigation plan will be required, please provide a copy of the plan if available. Describe briefly what your proposed mitigation would consist of: Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR . Page IS AGENCY*USE NON-PROJECT SPECIFIC ACTIONS: _\S, Complete this section only if your proposal involves a nonwroJect specific action such as a Com rehensive Plan p Amen ment, Zoning Code Amendment, area-wide rezone (City- It wideo arge sub-area),or other similar action: en answering these questions be aware of to what extent the roposal or the types of activities likely to result from Do the proposa. would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate th if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in g\ne al terms. r 1 . How wo u Id he proposal be likely to increase discharge to . N. water; emissl�ns to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measur s to avoid or reduce such increases: 2. How would the prop\osal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to conserve energy and natural resources: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas desigmated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protect�)n; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts: Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR P�g,e 19 AGENCY USE 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? /4t� Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreland and land use impacts: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s): 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. )Q By affixing my signature hereto, I/we certify and declare under penalty of perjury that the information furnished herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am the owner of the premises where the work is to be performed or am acting as the owner's authorized agent. I further agree to hold harmless the City of Port Angeles as to any claim (including costs, expenses and attorney's fees incurred in the investigation of such claim) which may be made by any person, including the undersigned, and filed against the City of Port Angeles, but only where such claim arises out of the reliance of the City, including its officers and employees, upon the accuracy of the information provided to the City as a part of this application. I further agree that City of Port Angeles staff may enter upon the subject property at any reasonable time to consider the merits of the application, to take photographs and to post public notices. SIGNED:�>W- -nq - DATE: UU ��-6 PHONE: 4 2,) Environmental Checklist EVALUATION F,OR Page 20 AGENCY USE NOTE: Most applicants should have the information necessary to answer most of the questions in this checklist. Additional information will need to be obtained from local and state agencies if it appears that the project is likely to affect ESA listed species. RESOURCE AGENCIES: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Website http://wdfw.wa.gov This site has useful information on fish habitat. Washington Department of Ecology Website www.ecy.wa.gov National Marine Fisheries Services Website Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) maps can be found at www.nwr.noaa.qo N 1 73P '71 r Aw, T-C AA 9th St A.-a 512 '524\ 514 516 rL 910 .......... 924 Mod 4A 9th St 40- 524 512 904 514 516 MAN 910 Alm 41 vw 924 MR October 2015 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Le PA &Il�2 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 pp v Nat 25 26 27 28 29 30 3 1-Halloween . , 00 I Created at www.CalendarHome.com! 15 16 17 18 19 20 -9th-S 512 UD 524 514 904 16 6 5 4 3--1 2 910 15 16 17 18 1 i 9 924 20 30 F 'ELES )TY 'QF ORT , NG- P A W A S H I NGTON, U. S. A. �L- n LNINWA Community & Economic Development Department January 7,2016 Janet Stevenson Properties by Landmark, Inc., 330 E. Ist St. Suite 1, Port Angeles,WA 98362 Dear Ms. Stevens, After review of the conditions,I can confirm that the approved conditional use permit, CUP 15-04,to rmit: join two adjacent structures into a duplex has met the three conditions placed on the pe 1. The applicant shall obtain City Building Department permits to convert the existing structures into a single structure duplex. Those plans shall be substantially consistent with the submitted plan set. (finaled building permit 15-1483) 2. A Zoning Lot Covenant combining Lots 3 &the east V2of Lot 4 shall be signed,notarized and recorded, once the building permit is given final approval and prior to occupancy of the structures. (Clallam County Assessor Record 2015-1328094) 3. The applicant shall plant 2 street trees in the.planting strip between the curb and sidewalk per PAMC 11.13.050. Trees shall be chosen from the List of Recommended Streets for Port Angeles. (Trees inspected and approved) If you have any questions please contact me at 360-417-475 1. Sincerely yours, Nathan West,AICP Director,Community and Economic Development Department Cc: Copy to file Phone: 360-417-4750 Fax: 360-417-4711 Website: www.cityofpa.us/Email: smartgrowth@cityofpa.us 321 East Fifth Street- P.O. Box 1150 / Port Angeles, VVA 98362-0217 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES In the Matter of the Application of NO. CUP 15-04 KAREN BRANDSTROM FINDINGS OF FACT, for a Zoning Conditional Use Permit CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION SUMMARY OF DECISION The application for a zoning conditional use permit to construct a duplex in a Residential Single Family (RS-7) zoning district is APPROVED, subjJect to conditions. SUMMARY OF RECORD Request: The applicant is proposing to combine two adjacent lots and two currently existing C) Im structures in order to create a duplex. Hearing Date: On October 28, 2015, a public hearing on the application was conducted before Lauren Erickson, City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner. Testimony: At the open record hearing the following individuals presented testimony under oath: Scott Johns, AICP, City of Port Angeles Nathan West, Community and Economic Development Director Janet Stevenson, applicant representative Exhibits: Exhibit I Overhead Photograph of lots Exhibit 2 Staff Report City of Port Angeles 321 East Fifth Port Angeles, WA 983162 HavinCy reviewed the record in full, inclUdino the above referenced exhibits and the testimony of the witnesses, the Hearing Examiner enters the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: FINDINGS OF FACT I. The applicant is seeking to combine two adjacent lots and connect two currently existing stmetures in order to create a duplex. 2. The subject properties are located at 512 and 514 West 9 th Street in Port Angeles Washington, and are legally described as Lots 3 and V2of Lot 4, Block 296, Townsite of Port Angeles. The properties are zoned Residential Single Family (RS-7). The properties are located in the North Central Planning Area of the City of Port Anaeles' Comprehensive Plan. The Plan desionates the site as residential. t) t) 3. The surrounding area is also zoned RS-7. 4. Duplexes are listed as a conditional use in the RS-7 zone. 5. Notice of the application and public hearing was published in the Peninsula Daily News on October 4, 2015, and was posted on the property on October 2, 2015. On October 7, 2015, notice of the application and public hearing was mailed to all Z property owners located within 300 feet of the subject proper-ties. 6. On October 28, 2015 an open record public hearing was held. 7. The City of Por-t Angeles received no written comments regarding the proposal. 8. No members of the public testified at the hearing. 9. The RS-7 zone requires lots to be a minimum of 7,000 square feet. 10. The lot located at"514 West 9 th" is 3500 square feet in size and is non- conforming. The structure located on this lot is also non-conforming in that the east side of the structure has no set back from the property line. The lot located at "512 West 9"' is 7000 square feet in size; the structure located on the lot is conforming. 11. Combincy the two lots creates a new lot 10,500 square feet in size, which is the C, minimum lot size required for a duplex. 12. The subject property is not located within a floodplain and no environmentally sensitive areas exist on or near the Subject property. 2 City of Port Angeles 321 East Fifth Port Angeles, WA 98362 13. On October 22, 2015, a Determination of Non-Significance was issued by the SEPA responsible Official. 14. No additional parking will be required by this proposal. 15. The proposal will not adversely impact the neighborhood character, traffic patterns, school attendance or other conditions of the neighborhood. 16. Copies of the proposal was circulated to City Departments and the following comments were provided: The Fire Department had no objection to the proposal based upon compliance with applicable building and fire codes. '-fhe Public Works Department did not comment. The Building Department commented: This action will help resolve the majority of issues with non conforming structures on lots with fire separation and set back issues, as this case presents. The building code shall require a fire separation of I hour—tested in accordance with ASTM E 119 or UL 263 with exposure from both sides When alterations, repairs or additions requiring a permit occur, or when one or more sleeping rooms are added or created in existing dwellings, the individual dwelling unit shall be equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide alarms located as required for new dwellings. Means of egress shall not be impeded by any new construction and it is highly advised that upgrades , if needed, to assure safe passage in the event of a hazardous condition. Also, please verif� any electrical or public works permits and upgrades that may be required. Alteralions, repairs or additions shall require a building permit as per the current adopted codes of the City of Port Angeles. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to hear this matter. 3 City of Port Angeles 321 East Fifth Port Angeles, WA 98362 2 Notices of the application and public hearing were properly given. 3. Pursuant to PANIC 17.96.050, conditional use permits may granted if consistent and compatible with the purpose and the zone in which the use is located, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and not contrary to the public use and interest. 4. In applying the law the to facts of the application herein, the undersigned concludes the proposal is consistent and compatible with the purpose of the zone in which it is located. The purpose of the RS-7 zone is to create and preserve single family residential neighborhoods; uses compatible with and functionally related to single family residential environments may be located in this zone. The proposed duplex is compatible with, and functionally related to a single family residential neighborhood. In fact the proposal helps preserve the neighborhood by eliminating the non-conforming lot size of the smaller parcel, and allows for re- newel and redevelopment of two currently existing structures. 5. In applying the law to the facts of the application herein,the undersigned concludes the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. One of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan is "to provide certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the challenges of the future. The proposal herein supports the goal of being flexible to meet the challenge of providing updated housing stock, and provides certainty by eliminating a currently existing non-conforming parcel. The proposal also adheres to the Plan's policy of promoting a variety of housing types and sizes. 6. There is nothing to indicate the proposal is in any way contrary to the public use and interest. DECISION Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the application for a zoning conditional use permit application(CUP 15-04) is APPROVED, sub,j ect to the following conditions: DECIDED this 2 nd day of November, 2015. 4 Lauren Erickson, Hearing Examiner 4 City of Port Angeles 321 East Fifth Port Angeles, WA 98362 CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall obtain City Building Department permits to convert the existing structures into a single structure duplex. Those plans shall be substantially consistent with the submitted plan set. 2. A Zoning Lot Covenant combining Lots 3 & the east V2of Lot 4 shall be signed, notarized and recorded, once the building permit is given final approval and prior to occupancy of the structures. 3. The applicant shall plant 2 street trees in the planting strip between the curb and sidewalk per PAMC 11.13.05 0. Trees shall be chosen from the List of Reconu-nended Streets for Port Angeles. 5 City of Port Angeles 321 East Fifth Poll Angeles, WA 98')62 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES In the Matter of the Application of NO. CUP 15-04 KAREN BRANDSTROM FINDINGS OF FACT, for a Zoning Conditional Use Permit ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION SUMMARY OF DECISION The application for a zoning conditional use permit to construct a duplex in a Residential Single Family (RS-7) zoning district is APPROVED, subjJect to conditions. SUMMARY OF RECORD Request: The applicant is proposing to combine two adjacent lots and two currently existing structures in order to create a duplex. HearingDate: On October 28, 2015, a public hearing on the application was conducted before Lauren Erickson, City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner. Testimony: At the open record hearing the following individuals presented testimony under oath: Scott Johns, AICP, City of Port Angeles Nathan West, Community and Economic Development Director Janet Stevenson, applicant representative Exhibits: Exhibit I Overhead Photograph of lots Exhibit 2 Staff Report City of Port Angeles 321 East Fifth Port Angeles, WA 98362 Having reviewed the record in full, including the above referenced exhibits and the testimony of the witnesses, the Hearing Examiner enters the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: FINDINGS OF FACT I. The applicant is seeking to combine two adjacent lots and connect two currently existing structures in order to create a duplex. 2. The subject properties are located at 512 and 514 West 9 th Street in Port Angeles Washington, and are legally described as Lots 3 and V2of Lot 4, Block 296, Townsite of Port Angeles. The properties are zoned Residential Single Family (RS-7), The properties are located in the North Central Planning Area of the City of Port Angeles' Comprehensive Plan. The Plan designates the site as residential. 3. The surrounding area is also zoned RS-7. 4. Duplexes are listed as a conditional use in the RS-7 zone. 5. Notice of the application and public hearing was published in the Peninsula Daily News on October 4, 2015, and was posted on the property on October 2, 2015. On October 7, 2015, notice of the application and public hearing was mailed to all property owners located within 300 feet of the subject properties. 6. On October 28, 2015 an open record public hearing was held. 7. The City of Port Angeles received no written conunents regarding the proposal. 8. No members of the public testified at the hearing. 9. The RS-7 zone requires lots to be a minimum of 7,000 square feet. 10. The lot located at"514 West 9 th" is 3500 square feet in size and is non- conforming. The structure located on this lot is also non-conforming in that the east side of the structure has no set back from the property line. The lot located at "512 West 9th is 7000 square feet in size; the structure located on the lot is conforming. 11. Combing the two lots creates a new lot 10,500 square feet in size, which is the minimum lot size required for a duplex. 12. The subject property is not located within a floodplain and no environmentally sensitive areas exist on or near the subject property. 2 City of Port Angeles 32 t East Fifth Port Angeles, WA 98362 0 13. On October 22, 2015, a Determination of Non-Significance was issued by the SEPA responsible Official. 14. No additional parking will be required by this proposal. 15. The proposal will not adversely impact the neighborhood character, traffic patterns, school attendance or other conditions of the neighborhood. 16. Copies of the proposal was circulated to City Departments and the following comments were provided: The Fire Department had no objection to the proposal based upon compliance with applicable building and fire codes. The Public Works Department did not comment. The Building Department commented: This action will help resolve the majority of issues with non conforming structures on lots with fire separation and set back issues, as this case presents. The building code shall require a fire separation of I hour—tested in accordance with ASTM E 119 or UL 263 with exposure from both sides When alterations, repairs or additions requiring a permit occur, or when one or more sleeping rooms are added or created in existii-ig dwellings, the individual dwelling unit shall be equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide alarms located as required for new dwellings. Means of egress shall not be impeded by any new construction and it is highly advised that upgrades , if needed, to assure safe passage in the event of a hazardous condition. Also, please verify any electrical or public works permits and upgrades that may be required. Alterations, repairs or additions shall require a building permit as per the current adopted codes of the City of Port Angeles. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to hear this matter. 3 City of Port Angeles 321 East Fifth Port Angeles, WA 98362 2. Notices of the application and public hearing were properly given. 3. Pursuant to PAMC 17.96.050, conditional use permits may granted if consistent and compatible with the purpose and the zone in which the use is located, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and not contrary to the public use and interest. 4. In applying the law the to facts of the application herein, the undersigned concludes the proposal is consistent and compatible with the purpose of the zone in which it is located. The purpose of the RS-7 zone is to create and preserve single family residential neighborhoods; uses compatible with and functionally related to single family residential environments may be located in this zone. The proposed duplex is compatible with, and functionally related to a single family residential neighborhood. In fact the proposal helps preserve the neighborhood by eliminating the non-conforming lot size of the smaller parcel, and allows for re- newel and redevelopment of two currently existing structures. 5. In applying the law to the facts of the application herein,the undersigned concludes the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. One of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan is "to provide certainty to its citizens about future land use and the flexibility necessary to meet the challenges of the future. The proposal herein supports the goal of being flexible to meet the challenge of providing updated housing stock, and provides certainty by eliminating a currently existing non-conforming parcel. The proposal also adheres to the Plan's policy of promoting a variety of housing types and sizes. 6. There is nothing to indicate the proposal is in any way contrary to the public use and interest. DECISION Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the application for a zoning conditional use permit application (CUP 15-04) is APPROVED, su�j ect to the following conditions: DECIDED this 2 nd day of November, 2015. Lauren Erickson, Hearing Examiner 4 City of Port Angeles 321 East Fifth Port Angeles, WA 98362 0 0 CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall obtain City Building Department permits to convert the existing structures into a single structure duplex. Those plans shall be substantially consistent with the submitted plan set. 2. A Zoning Lot Covenant combining Lots 3 & the east Y2of Lot 4 shall be signed, notarized and recorded, once the building permit is given final approval.and prior to occupancy of the structures. 3. The applicant shall plant 2 street trees in the planting strip between the curb and sidewalk per PAMC 11.13.050. Trees shall be chosen from the List of Reconiniended Streets for Port Angeles. 5 City of Port Angeles 321 East Fifth Port Angeles, WA 98362 $TAT STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775 -Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 -(360)407-6300 711 for Washington Relay Service -Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 October 19, 2015 Scott Johns, Associate Planner City of Port Angeles Community and Economic Development PO Box 1150 Port Angeles, WA 98362 Dear Mr. Johns: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the optional determination of nonsignificance/notice of application for the Brandstrom Duplex Project located at 512 and 514 West 9th Street as proposed by Jerolee and Karen Bradstrom. The Department of Ecology (Ecology) reviewed the environmental checklist and has the following comment(s): TOXICS CLEANUP: Matthew Morris (360) 407-7529 Comments apply if any ground disturbance while creating the covered area between the two properties: If contamination is suspected, discovered, or occurs during the proposed storage area construction, testing of the potentially contaminated media must be conducted. If contamination of soil or groundwater is readily apparent, or is revealed by testing, Ecology must be notified. Contact the Environmental Report Tracking System Coordinator at the Southwest Regional Office (SWRO) at(360) 407-6300. For assistance and information about subsequent cleanup and to identify the type of testing that will be required, contact Matthew Morris with the SWRO, Toxic Cleanup Program at the phone number given above. Ecology's comments are based upon information provided by the lead agency. As such, they may not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments,please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office (SM:15-5060) cc: Matthews Morris, TCP Jerolee &Karen Bradstrom (Applicants) CITY OF PORT ANGELES AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING RE: Conditional Use CUP 15-04for the conversion of two single family residential structures into a duplex. SAVi hA 1, CAvi;IaGa , state that on the ;4-��day of October)�,�2015� I mailed said notice, a true copy of which is hereto attached and made part hereof, to property owners within 300 feet of the property proposed for a land use action pursuant to Section 17.96.140 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. Ai A-A I JAMrA A-FFA�T Subscribed to me this day of L±D1Qex 2015. X N TARY PUBLIC for the State i,,f shington, residing in Port Angeles WA So T/Ibrnis/a fl-i dav itpostin g j im 1010612015 TUE 10! 37 FAX 3604172299 ClaLlIaLM COUn-Ey A85655or U001/003 ej q/ art 10/0612015 TTJE IQ! �37 FAX 3604172299 ClaLllam CounEy ASSeasor 0 0 prop_ld first—name last name 58381 DAVID E HASSEL . 58382 DAVID AND DEBORAH HASSEL 58383 HAROLD M HUTCHISON III 58384 MMB LLC 58385 MMB LLC 58386 LARRY R AND VICKIE L SUTTON 58390 CHARLES M CRAMPTON TTE 58391 GEORGE BRAKUS 58392 THOMAS R HUMLEKER 58393 ALASTAIR M LUMSDEN 58394 TOM M AND AMY V NASH 58395 TERRENCE R SCHIER 58396 GEORGE LAND J RAZZORE AND COLLIER 58397 NANCY BELL 58399 PORT ANGELES LODGE 996 58400 BRIDGETTE JOHNSON 58401 PORT ANGELES LODGE 996 58857 PORT ANGELES LODGE 996 58858 JASON L MOGI 58859 JAMES AND COLLEEN AND RONALD LINDLEY 58861 WILLIAM LAND RENA C KEITH 58862 REINA AND MICHAEL BARRETO AND MILLS 58865 LEE R AND SHIRLEY M HUNT 58866 SANDRA AND JEFFERY WATERHOUSE 58867 JERROLEE W BRANDSTROM 58868 JERROLEE W BRANDSTROM 58869 MARGERY A KEPNER 58870 MARK AND MERIDA BOWES 58871 JOHN E MC FADDEN 58872 DONALD N AND ALICE D MITCHELL 58873 KATHLEEN E MC LENNAN 58876 KATHLEEN L CRAIN 58877 ANTHONY AND MISSY RUSIN 58878 DAVID AND HEATHER MAY 58879 DOLORES A STETSON 58880 JOHN 0 DAILEY 58883 WILMA TRILLINGHAM TTE 58884 LEO P AND DEBBIE HAGER 59218 JUSTON E SPENCER 59219 ARLAYNE COGIBURN 59220 MATTHEW J AND K M BAI LEY AN D MARTI N EZ 59221 WILLIAM M KITZ 1/9222 WARREN C KIMZEY 51;9 2 2 3 ALAN B GARLING'. ,/59235 JOHN R NELSON CITY OF PORT ANGELES 10/06/2015 TUE lOt37 FAX 3604172299 ClaLllam Coun-Ey A55055or addr-linel addr_city addr st addr-Zip --Po-go-R Sao PORT ANGri-ES WA 98362 --VO-9'0—X 580 PORTANGELES WA 98362 519 S K ST PORTANGELES WA 98363 1112 W ISTH ST PORT ANGELES WA 98363 1112 W 15TH ST PORTANGELES WA 98363 P 0 BOX 85 JOYCE WA 98343 539 W 9TH ST PORTANGELES WA 98362-7301 531 W 9TH ST PORTANGELES WA 98362-7301 92 GLACIER LN PORTANGELES WA 98363 6009 JON COURT SE OLYMPIA WA 98513 118 CAROLINA STREET BELLINGHAM WA 98225 511 W gTi-I ST PORTANGELES WA 98362-7301 PO BOX 1767 PORTANGELES WA 98362 67 CUNNINGHAM RD WARREN CT C)6754 809 S PINE ST PORTANGELES WA 98362 136 SLEEPY HOLLOW LN PORT ANGELES WA 98363-8512 %809 S PINE ST PORTANGELES WA 98362 809 5 PINE ST PORTANGELES WA 98362 903 S PINE ST PORT ANGELES WA 98362 411LOPEZST PORTANGELES WA 98362-6506 150 CLIFF ROBINSON LN SEQUIM WA 98382-8215 919 S PINE ST PORTANGELES WA 98362 904 S PINE ST PORT ANGELES WA 98362 910 SO PINE ST PORT ANGELES WA 983�; 140 NE 164TH ST SHORELINE WA 98155-5736 140 NE 164TH ST SHORELINE WA 98155-5736 .S16 W NINTH ST PORT ANGELES WA 98362 524.W 9TH ST PORTANGELES WA 98362-7302 528 W 9TH ST PORTANGELES WA 98362-7302 2356 E SIXTH AVE PORT ANGELES WA 98362 19 SYLVAN RD BILLERICA MA 18215 531 W 10TI-I ST PORTANGELFS WA 98362-7304 529 W 10TH 5T. PORTANGELES WA 98363 11251 28TH AVE SW SEATTLE WA 98146 3634 N STEVENS ST TACOMA WA 98407 519 W 10TH ST PORTANGELE5 WA 98362-7304 501 W 10TH ST PORT ANGELES WA 98362 924 S P(NE ST PORT ANGELES WA 98362-7319 201 E PRAIRIE ST LBBY OFC SEQUIM WA 98382 434 PINNELL RD SEQUIM WA 98382 512 W 10TH ST PORT ANGELES WA 98362-7305 PO BOX 761 PORTANGELES WA 98362-0133 337 FORS RD PORT ANGELES WA 98363-9402 528 W 10TH ST PORTANGELES WA 98362-7305 1003 S PINE ST PORTANGELES WA 98362-7320 PO BOX 1150 PORT ANGELES WA 98362-0217 0 0 CITY OF PORT ANGELES AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING RE: CUP 15-04 I, state that on the 5 th day of October 2015, 1 posted said notice, a true copy of which is hereto attached and made part hereof, on the City's Public Notice Bulletin Board,. AFFIANT Subscribed to me this day of 2015. NOTARY PUBLIC for the State of Washington, residing in Port Angeles T/forms/affidavit postin.-general CITY OF PORT ANGELES AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING RE: 1, JIM LIERLY, state that on the day of 2015, 1 posted said notice, a true copy of which is hereto attached and made part hereof, on the property proposed for a land use action pursuant to Section .96.140 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code AFFIANT Subscribed to me this day of 2015. NOTARY PUBLIC for the State of Washington, residing in Port Angeles T/form s/a 11-i dav itpostingi im CITY OF PORT ANGELES NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVENthat on October 1, 2015, the CITY OF PORT ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF COMM-UNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT received an application to permit the creation of a duplex by combining two existing parcels and two existing structures in the Residential Single Family RS-7 zone. The application was determined to be complete on October 1, 2015. Interested parties are encouraged to comment on the proposal and to attend the public hearing that will be conducted on-OCTOBER 28, 2015, at 1:00 PM, City Hall, 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, Washington. Written comment must be submitted no later than OCTOBER 20, 2015, to be included in the staff report on this matter. Verbal testimony will be taken during the public hearing. Information may be reviewed 'at the City Department of Community & Economic Development, City Hall, P.O. Box 1150, 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles. City Hall is accessible to persons with disabilities. Interested parties are invited to attend the meeting. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT: It is anticipated that a Determination of Non Sigrificance (DNS) will be issued per WAC 197-11-355 for the project following the public comment review period that will end on October 20, 2015. APPLICANT: Karen Brandstrorn LOCATION: 5 12/514 W. 9"' Street For further information contact: Scott K. Johns (360) 417-4752 PUB: October 7,2015 POST: October 5,2015 MAIL: October 5,2015 Amm� CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING PROOHRECEIPT Client: PDN4900481 CITY OF PORT ANGELES/LEGALS Phone: (360) 4 17-4613 Address: PO BOX 1150 PORTANGELES, WA 98362 Ad 9 661366 Requested By: Fax: Sales Rep.: Weider, Parn Phone: (360) 452-2345 pweider@peiiiiisuladailynews.com Fax: Class.: 9931 Clalfarn COUnty Legals Start Date: 10/04/2015 End Date: 10/04/2015 Nb.of Inserts: PO 9: 512/512 W.9TH PUblications: Peninsula Daily News Paid A1110U11t: $0.00 Balance: $57.67 Total Price: IS57.67 Page I of 2 CITY OF PORT ANGELES NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on October 1. 2015, the CITY OF PORT ANGELES DE. PARTMENT OF COM- MUNITY&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTre- ceived an application to permit the creation of a duplex by combining two existing parcels and two existing structures in the Residential Single Fami- ly RS-7 zone. The appli- cation was determined to be complete on Octo- ber 1,2015. Interested parties are encouraged to comment on the pro. posal and to attend the public hearing that will be conducted on OCTO- BER 28, 2015, at 1:00 PM,City Hall,321 East Fifth Street, Port An- geles, Washington. Written comment must be submitted no later than OCTOBER 20, 2DI5.to be included in the staff report on this matter. Verbal testimo- ny will be taken during the public hearing, Infor- mation may be reviewed at the City Department of Community & Eco- nomic Development, City Hall,RO.Box 1150, 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles. City Hall is accessible to persons with disabilities.Interest- ed parties are invited to attend the meeting. STATE ENVIRONMEN- TAL POLICY ACT: It is anticipated that a Deter- mination of Non Signfi- cance(DNS)will be is- sued per WAC 197-11- 355 for the project fol- lowing the public com- ment review period that will end on October 20. 20.5. APPLICANT: K a r a n Brandstrom LOCATION: 512/514 W.9th Street For further information contact:Scott K.Johns (360)417-4752 Pub: October 7, 2015 Le - gal No'661366 0 0 CITY OF PORT ANGELES NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on October 1, 2015, the CITY OF PORT ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT received an application to permit the creation of a duplex by combining two existing parcels and two existing structures in the Residential Single Family RS-7 zone. The application was determined to be complete on October 1, 2015. Interested parties are encouraged to comment on the proposal and to attend the public hearing that will be conducted on-OCTOBER 28, 2015, at 1:00 PM, City Hall, 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, Washington. Written coniment must be submitted no later than OCTOBER 20, 2015, to be included in the staff report on this matter. Verbal testimony will be taken during the public hearing. Information may be reviewed at the City Department of Community & Economic Development, City Hall, P.O. Box 1150, 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles. City Hall is accessible to persons with disabilities. Interested parties are invited to attend the meeting. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT: It is anticipated that a Determination of Non Signficance (DNS) will be issued per WAC 197-11-355 for the project following the public cornment review period that will end on October 20, 2015. APPLICANT: Karen Brandstrom LOCATION: 512/514 W. 9"' Street For further information contact: Scott K. Johns (360) 417-4752 PUB: October 7,2015 POST: October 5,2015 MAIL: October 5,2015 Properties by — LMDMARI Inc. 330 E.. 1 st Street Suite 1 - Port Angeles,WA 98362 Ph. (360)452-1326- Fax: (360)457-3212 Website: portangeleslandmark.com Email: City of Port Angeles Community and Economic Development Dept AUG 10 2015 321 E. 5" CITY OF PORT AN ES Port Angeles, Wa. 98362 COMMUNITY&ECON01MIC ONFELOPMENT Attn: Scott Johns, Nathan West et al. Dear Sirs, I am requesting with this document that we are able to get a variance on the property located at 512 and 514 West Ninth Street. The two small homes have always been used as a single property and the complication of the property line proposes a difficulty in being able to sell it easily. In the attached proposal,we have line out the reasoning in our opinion,of why we should be able to join the two units and call it a duplex. Please consider the proposal as the owner has recently lost her husband and is aging and not doing well herself and she needs to try to get this off her plate. We have a buyer who would like to buy the home, but is running in to barriers with her bank. Please contact me if I can answer any questions for you. Sincerely, "' . 4XUJ414� J net M. Stevenson D n, i esignated Broker janet M.Stevenson Property Manager Designated Broker Properties by LA DMARK Inc. 330 E. FIRST ST.,SUITE 1 * PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 (360)452-1326 - FAX(360)457-3212 email:janet@portangeleslandmark.com ; portangeleslandm rk.com r,;, - 77F'g� ---I Problem: I have listed and am currently trying to sell the property at 512 and 514 W. 9th. I have been told, that due to the parcels of each they must sell separately, yet they have always been looked upon as 1 property and 1 family has owned them historically. The homes were built there in 1915 and have always been owned by the same family. The granddaughter of the original owners is now very elderly, has lost her husband already and is living in an assisted living unit with failing health. Her family needs to sell these homes. The parcels have an added layer of complication since 514 is non-conforming because of how small the parcel is and could not rebuilt if it burned or partially destroyed. I have an offer on the property and should we make the buyer get 2 separate loans all of her fess go up and the bank might not even loan on the smaller one at all. Since this property would be grandfathered in the current state and has been there since 1915 it seems overkill to not allow it to sell as a duplex and let us remove the lot line. It seems in the city's best interest since a 25" lot does not even accommodate this house. We have the square footage to call it a duplex with some sort of manipulation in the structure. This is in an RS7 zoning area, but has always been used as a multi-unit property. They were not changed to be two units; they have always been two units since the time of the construction. The problem has developed because of the code changes over time. Definition of a duplex: 2 joining units that have separate entrance and separate living spaces, but are joined in such a manner as to be 1 building due to construction. Proposal: I am proposing that these two structures be joined by an awning, a common breezeway, decking or some addition as to allow us to call the property a duplex so that we might be able to remove the lot line and make this one lot. I would ask your imput as to how we might do this to meet the current needs of the elderly owner. There are many of these such cases in Port Angeles, as we manage and have managed over the years. There must be a way to transfer title of these units so that those who hold title can sell them and not pay the penalty of having to remove one of the structures. I respectfully ask that you help us through this process so that this family is not penalized for the environment of the municipal codes and the rules, but are able to sell their family property in a way that is not harming or changing of any of the current uses, but meet the variance requirements that you might need to allow us proceed. I would hope that it would someh6w be grandfathered in to be a legitimate use of the structures that are present and have been since the early 1900s. We realize if any structure is removed it could not be put back with the current setbacks, but we are not proposing that. The value is in what is there currently and many of the neighbor's property also does not meet current codes and setbacks. It would seem that would not object to the property remaining the same as it has always has been with a lot line adjustment. Please contact me if I might have imput on this decision in any way. 531 502 525 44 521 502 4a r 519 536 532 511 528 524 505 516 514 512 INI 527 904 525 910 903 q 519 4Z, 924 TA 509 909 501 919 91 512 A S 531 502 525 521 502 519 536 814 532 511 528 524 505 516 514 512 527 904 525 910 903 519 509 909 501 919 /�5 1�2 /91-9 File APPLICANVOWNER INFORMATION: A p p I i can t: -)-&-r r D Lk-9- uO t-5 Cav-'A Applicant Address: Daytime plione 4: E-mail Applicant's representative (if other than applicant),- Contact Add I ress: A--(b 12 Y Daytime phone#: ,�010`tOj c)\ E-mail Property owner(if other than applicant): Je��ot-Q-Q, �-J Address: )A-0 Contaetphone #: PROPERTY INFORMATION: Street address: Zoning: Legal description: /2L ex'�Iad Property dimensions: I Property area(total square feet): Physical characteristics (i.e., flat, sloped, vacant, developed, etc.): PROPOSED USE: Please d—ribe the proposed conditional use: V) -PN4kc 4 41te k4- Y;14e- a dre,ex, 4, 4, A glir Number of employees: Hours of operation: Number of on-site parking spaces: Total square foot of floor area for the proposal: % Site coverage: SIGNATURES; App I i can t:(A- Date: I certify Arhat all of the abovestatetnents are true and complete to the best of my knowledge and -epresentation of information will terminate this permit application. ackno",ledge that wi�fid inist Applicant Signature+� Date -operty owner, the property owner must sign this application or (If the applicant is NOT the pi -e aware of the application). she islai provide a separate note that hel Owner's Signature(if other than applicant): Signature Date T:TORMS\APPS\CUP.DOCX -V p Af, 512 514 516 rat Jk :77� 910 ANN 4 502 531 L4 525 521 502 519 �q 536 814 511 532 523 524 505 516 51 512 41 904 525 910 903 519 9 4 714 509 909 501 70 919 /512' 91 AVA .- .......... IZ coo _ Now 4 00�' At 14, ----------- FT '!7 N vo� -tv A aw V N4 531 502 525 521 502 519 536 532 511 814 .9 528 524 505 516 514 512 527 904 525 910 903 519 924 509 909 501 701 19 9 9 Port Angeles, WA Code of 0*nees Page I of I 17.95.080 - Breezeway. If an accessory building is connected to a principal building by a breezeway.the accessory building shall not be considered a part of the principal building. (Ord. 3272, 2/16/2007; Ord. 2668 § 11 (part), 1/17/1992; Ord. 1709 § 1 (part), 12/22/1970) about:blank 8/19/2015 0 10 Exhibit A Parcel 1: 06 --5c)0 VDIC10 0000D Lot Three (3) Block Two Hundred Ninety Six (296) of the Government Townsite 4V tvjq Owner of Port Angeles. -Buyer Parce] 2: 0&-, 5V0CV ,�C/&/ St9CC0 The East Twenty Five (25) Feet of Lot Four(4) 13 lock Two Hundred and Ninety Owner Six (296) of the Government Townsite of Port Angelles. J-14- L 7 7 lo P44 g_UC_9r7 000 It _40q5 T L T ye, _L__ _7 0 C, ,5t4 T1 L4 -1 r 3 0 ehin L, -7