Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05282025 Planning Agenda Packet REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION May 28, 2025 6:00 - 8:00 PM Notice is hereby given that the Port Angeles Planning Commission will meet on Wednesday, May 28, 2025, starting at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in City Hall located at 321 E. 5th Street, Port Angeles, WA. This meeting will be conducted as a hybrid meeting. In hybrid meetings, members of the public, Committee members, and City staff have the option to attend the meeting in person at City Hall or remotely through the Webex virtual meeting platform. For those planning to attend remotely, learn how to watch the meeting live and participate during the public comment period by visiting: https://www.cityofpa.us/Live-Virtual-Meetings For audio only please call: 1-844-992-4726 Use access code: 2553 753 5975 Webinar password: PC20250528 (72202505 when dialing from a phone or video system) Once connected press *3 to raise your virtual hand, if you wish to make a comment or public testimony. You will be notified when it is your turn to speak. This access code will work for the May 28, 2025 meeting only. If you are joining the meeting through the Webex link and wish to make a comment or provide public testimony, please use the “raise your hand” feature in Webex. You will be notified when it is your turn to speak. Virtual Webex Meeting Link: https://cityofpa.webex.com/cityofpa/j.php?MTID=mc707983719dd796f1f8068346b66e8a6 The meeting is open to the public. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. PUBLIC COMMENT IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the April 23, 2025 Meeting V. ACTION/DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Discussion: Neighborhood Service and Engagement Planning As part of the Comprehensive Plan Update, the neighborhoods are being re-evaluated while adding components to bring neighbors together and preparing for emergency preparedness. 2. Discussion: Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update Discussion on the past elements presented for the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Discussion: Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update Discuss the Conservation Element. VI. STAFF UPDATES 1. Monthly Building Report 2. Monthly Affordable Housing Report 3. Monthly Natural Resources Report 4. Monthly Land Use Permitting Report 5. PAW Award Presentation VII. REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT IX. ADJOURNMENT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Port Angeles, Washington April 23, 2025 This meeting was conducted as a hybrid meeting. CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING Chair Young called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles Planning Commission to order at 6:02 p.m. ROLL CALL Planning Commission Chair Colin Young, Commissioners Schorr, Mellema, McMillan. Members Absent: Vice Chair Steiger, Commissioner Stanley, Kiedrowski Staff Present: Community and Economic Development Director Shannen Cartmel, Associate Planner Chloe Bonsen, Senior Development Services Specialist Pat Bartholick, Natural Resource Associate Planner Courtney Bornsworth. PUBLIC COMMENT John Ralson, City resident Façade Grant comments, supports both façade grants but is very happy and support of the oral surgery place on 8th and Race. James Taylor, City Resident Planning Commission’s open house for the comprehensive plan, overall was good. Notice that the maps are not available. Noticed the absence of the Planning Commission. Noticed that there was a lack of engagement and outreach. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion made by Mellema, seconded by Schorr. Schorr made a motion to approve the minutes with the edits she provided. Seconded by McMillan. Motion carried 4-0. AGENDA ITEMS Action: Façade and Sign Improvement Grant FSG 25-02. Staff presentation on a façade grant proposal for Turella Oral Surgery, 902 East 8th Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362. Action: Façade and Sign Improvement Grant FSG 25-03. Staff presentation on a façade grant proposal for Coastal Health, 621 E Front St, Port Angeles, WA 98362. Discussion: MCA 25-0045: Animal Husbandry Code Update Introduction to Animal Husbandry within the City of Port Angeles. Discussion: Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update. Review of Planning Commission comments on previously reviewed Elements. ACTION ITEMS/DISCUSSION ITEMS/PUBLIC HEARING Action Item: Façade and Sign Improvement Grant FSG 25-02 It was moved by Schorr and seconded by Melema to: CITY OF PORT ANGELES PLANNING COMMISSION – April 23, 2025 Page 2 of 3 Motion to approve the façade grant FSG 25-02. Motion carried 4-0. Action Item: Façade and Sign Improvement Grant FSG 25-03 It was moved by Melema and seconded by McMellen to: Motion to approve funding for façade improvement grant 25-03. Motion carried 4-0. Discussion Item: MCA 25-0045: Animal Husbandry Code Update Introduction to Animal Husbandry within the City of Port Angeles STAFF UPDATES Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update Associate Planner Bonsen gave a brief update about the upcoming public engagement opportunities. Monthly Building Report Senior Development Services Specialist Bartholick gave a brief comparison of the monthly building report for February and March. Monthly Affordable Housing Report Director Cartmel commented on the PAWA Award information. Monthly Natural Resources Report Associate Planner Bornsworth provided the following updates on active SEPA and shoreline permits, upcoming plans for the City Shade, and Council’s approval of the FEMA floodplain ordinance. Monthly Land Use Permitting Report Associate Planner Bonsen gave a brief update on Mobile and Itinerant Vendor permits. COMMISSION REPORTS Commissioner Schorr asked about the attainable workforce housing summit. Commissioner McMillan asked if there is a way to partner with building owners who have buildings in poor condition to make them aware of the façade grant program. SECOND PUBLIC COMMENT John Ralston, City Resident Commented on the attainable workforce housing summit. Commented on the 5th Element building on 8th street that utilized the façade grant program and another building on Peabody outside of the downtown area that also utilized the grant. James Taylor, City Resident Port Angeles Business Association is hosting Clea Rome on April 29, 2025. APEX Accelerator is used to support small businesses that want to pursue federal funding but cannot figure out how to do it. Commented on the return on investment of the program. Mentioned that he brought the Comprehensive Plan Open House wasn’t publicly noticed until he brought it up to City Manager West. Commented on the need to communicate with the county, especially on their expansion of the UGA in their comprehensive plan. Commented on being frustrated about the lack of communication regarding the comprehensive plan updates. CITY OF PORT ANGELES PLANNING COMMISSION – April 23, 2025 Page 3 of 3 ADJOURNMENT Chair Young motioned to adjourn the meeting at 7:20 p.m. Commissioner McMillan seconded the motion. _____________________________________ _______________________________ Chair Young, Chair Chloe Bonsen, Secretary Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 1 MAKERS architecture and urban design Vision 2045 Neighborhood Analysis Report Port Angeles 2025 Comprehensive Plan Update DRAFT March 2025 Introduction and Summary Port Angeles is a city in northwest Washington State with a 2024 estimated population of 20,410 people. The city’s Comprehensive Plan designates 18 neighborhoods and defines neighborhood as “An area located within a district or planning area where people live and is defined by the primary type and/or density of the residential units located in that particular area of the district.” That definition is land use-focused, but the concept of a “neighborhood” originates from the relationships between neighbors. Another definition of neighborhood from the social sciences is: “A neighborhood is a geographically localized community within a larger city, town, or suburb”, and further, “A neighborhood is a geographically localized community within a larger city, town, or suburb. Neighborhoods are often social communities with considerable face -to-face interaction among members. Neighborhoods are typically generated by social interaction among people living near one another. In this sense, they are local social units larger than households, but not directly under the control of city or state officials.”1 Today, neighborhood boundaries have little practical application because the City does not use them for planning, budgeting, or programming purposes. Port Angeles is interested in confirming or revising neighborhood boundaries for the purpose of applying more intentional focus to neighborhoods. Because neighborhoods are about people and individuals as much as natural or artificial boundaries, drawing official neighborhood boundaries is always a delicate exercise that merits healthy debate and discussion from people who live across the city. However, Port Angeles has several specific goals in mind that could help shape reasonable and functional neighborhood boundaries, including (in rough order of importance): 1. Establishing neighborhood representatives who have formal connections to City Hall and who can advocate for neighborhood needs. 1 Source link Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 2 MAKERS architecture and urban design 2. Establishing a community emergency response team (CERT) program or similar effort, which relies upon volunteers to undergo training and store equipment to supplement government first responders in emergencies. 3. Encouraging environmental stewardship efforts like stream restoration and tree planning. 4. Encouraging social events like picnics, block parties, garage sales, and street/park cleanups. To inform new neighborhood boundaries, first the existing boundaries must be understood. This report presents an analysis of Port Angeles’s existing neighborhood boundaries and a summary of findings and case studies from how other cities use neighborhood boundaries for programs. Summary of key findings: • Current neighborhood boundaries are defined primarily by land use and physical features like creeks, ravines, and arterial streets, but community identity often forms through social interactions that may not align with these strict geographic lines. Revising boundaries must involve community input, ensuring that the “neighborhood” reflects lived experiences and local identity. • In addition to inconsistencies between existing neighborhood boundaries and community- defined neighborhoods, there are differences compared to school attendance zones and Census boundaries. Reconciling these boundaries may support more effective planning. • Case studies from Tacoma, Seattle, Spokane, and Vancouver show a variety of models of neighborhood council/association that successfully engage residents and leverage local resources. These examples may provide actionable frameworks to be adapted locally. • Regularly sponsored community events, such as cleanups, stewardship initiatives, and social gatherings, are identified as key mechanisms for improving neighborhood quality and fostering a sense of shared identity. • Incorporating programs like Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT) at a neighborhood level can enhance local disaster readiness and provide dedicated spaces for resource coordination during emergencies. Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 3 MAKERS architecture and urban design Current Neighborhood Boundaries The current neighborhood boundaries are described by Figure A.11 in Appendix A of the Comprehensive Plan. A more legible version of that figure is provided below. There are 18 neighborhoods in the city limits. Their boundaries that are internal to the city typically align with creeks and ravines, bluffs, and arterial streets. Existing Neighborhood Boundaries The City of Port Angeles shown with existing neighborhood boundaries and names Most of the city is covered by residential land use. Three of the neighborhoods - Airport, Southwest, and Ediz Hook - have predominately industrial or commercial land uses with few or no residents. Pine Hill is perhaps the most geographically-determined neighborhood, being a narrow peninsula between two steep creek ravines. Mt. Angeles, Mill Creek, and White’s Creek are similarly situated between creeks. Downtown is an example of a land use and zoning- determined neighborhood as it is almost contiguous with the Central Business District zone. Some neighborhoods have relatively well-established names and can be identified by their important locations, such as Cherry Hill being the mixed-use area on the bluff above Downtown Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 4 MAKERS architecture and urban design and Georgiana being the residential area around Olympic Medical Center and on the bluff above the old Rayonier Mill site. Most other neighborhoods have relatively generic names referenced from geographical features and boundaries that are somewhat arbitrarily defined by streets. These neighborhoods may be the most important to consider for revisions with community input. Key Questions Focused engagement could be done on these neighborhood boundaries with key questions , such as: • West End/Crown: Is there a significant difference marked by 10th Street? • Lincoln Park/Harbor View: Is there a significant difference marked by 8th Street? Do these areas share an identity more with Shane Park or Lincoln Park? • Lincoln Park: This neighborhood is large. Could it be partitioned into smaller areas? Do the residents between Highway 101 Lauridsen Boulevard identify with the larger neighborhood? • Are there enough people living in Airport and Southwest to describe these are neighborhoods, or should they be merged with other adjacent neighborhoods or unmapped for City programming purposes? • Cherry Hill: Does the area south of 8th Street identify with the core Cherry Hill area on the bluff above Downtown? • Peabody Creek/Jefferson/Civic: Do these feel like three distinct areas? Does a boundary line along Peabody Creek better implement the City’s goals? • Lauridsen/Mill Creek: Is there a significant difference marked by Park Avenue? • How should commercial corridors be included in one neighborhood or another, especially along the First Street/Front Street couplet? • Should unincorporated neighborhoods be mapped for planning purposes, such as Gale’s Addition outside the northeast part of the city limits? Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 5 MAKERS architecture and urban design Boundary Review The charts below highlight the locational attributes, document key environmental features, and compare the boundaries to local census tracts for each of the 18 neighborhoods. Airport Location The airport neighborhood extends west from 'M' Street to the western City limit and south from 18th Street to the City's southern limits and is the City's largest neighborhood. Environmental features There is a ravine along the NW boundary, landfill site in the NW corner, and marine land along the northern coast. Water features include Chickamin Creek, Dry Creek, and some wetlands. Census map relation The Airport neighborhood is completely contained within Census Tract FIPS #53009000700. All Census blocks align to the neighborhood boundary with the exception of Block 3001, which contains the landfill site and the waterfront edge of the West End neighborhood. Community Amenities ODT, Volunteer Field West End Location The West End neighborhood extends west from 'M' Street to the marine bluff, and south from 10th Street to 18th Street, and is one of the least-developed areas of the city. The Olympic Discovery Trail spans the neighborhood following Milwaukee Drive from 10th Street to 18th Street. Environmental features Marine land and a ravine framed by W 18th St. and McDonald St., east of the Ocean View Cemetery, along the north boundary line, and a minor wetland. Census map relation The West End neighborhood is completely contained within Census Tract FIPS #53009000700. All Census blocks align to the neighborhood boundary with the exception of Block 3001, which contains the waterfront edge of the Airport neighborhood, and Block 2001, which protrudes into the western boundary line of the Lincoln Park neighborhood. Community Amenities ODT, Community Cemetery, Hamilton Elementary Crown Location The Crown neighborhood extends from 'I' Street on the east to the marine bluff on the west and from 10th Street on the south to the top of the marine bluff on the north. Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 6 MAKERS architecture and urban design Environmental features The marine bluff and shoreline west of Ediz Hookand a ravine north of W 4th St create the northern boundary line. A north/south ravineruns down to hill street from 4th between “I” and “K Streets. A prominent ridge of elevation exists between 7th, “I”, 10th, and “M” Streets Census map relation The Crown neighborhood is almost completely contained within Census Tract FIPS #53009000700, with the exception of the east-most corner containing the vacant parcels within W Hill St. and W 4th St. and residential parcels at the corner of K St. and 5th St. This small area is a portion of Block 3005, within Census Tract FIPS #53009000800, which makes up the majority of the Lincoln Park neighborhood. Census blocks 1007 and 1010 are also split between Crown and Ediz Hook neighborhoods. Community Amenities ODT, Crown Park Ediz Hook Location North-most neighborhood, including the entirety of the Ediz Hook spit, bounded by the Salish Sea coast to the north, Valley St. to the SE, and a jagging line to the south that roughly follows the southern boundary of the Harbor planning area. Environmental features The entire neighborhood is surrounded by critical areas an shorelines. The southern border is the marine bluff, and marine shorelines constitute the north and west borders, with Valley Creek acting as the eastern border. The Ediz hook lagoon located west of Ediz Hook Rd. is a significant wetland and marine shore habitat. Census map relation The Ediz Hook neighborhood is completely contained within Census Tract FIPS #53009000700. Census Blocks 1007 and 1010 are split between Ediz Hook and Crown neighborhoods. Community Amenities Waterfront Trail, Harborview Park, Sail and Paddle Park, Port Angeles Marina Downtown Location The downtown neighborhood is the smallest neighborhood, extending north from the marine bluff to the waterfront and east from Valley Street to Chase Street on the east, and extending east along the Waterfront Trail to Vine Street (extended). Environmental features The Entire neighborhood is surrounded by critical areas: the marine bluff to the south, Port Angeles Harbor to the north Valley Creek estuary to the east, and Hollywood Beach and a small wetland at the intersection of Hollywood Beach and Olympic Discovery Trail to the east. Census map relation The Downtown neighborhood contains portions of four Census Tracts, FIPS #53009000700, #000800, #000900, and #001000. Split Census Blocks include Block 1005 with Cherry Hill, Block 1007 with Peabody Creek, and Block 1003 with both Peabody Creek and Georgiana neighborhoods. Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 7 MAKERS architecture and urban design Community Amenities Pebble Beach Park, Blackball ferry terminal, Gateway transit center, Conrad Dyar Memorial Fountain, City Pier, Feiro Marine Life Center, Field Arts and Events Hall. Georgiana Location The Georgiana neighborhood extends north from the Georgiana/Front Street alley to the waterfront and extends from Vine Street on the west to the Whites Creek Ravine on the west. Environmental features The marine bluff to the north is a geologically hazardous area. Rayonier Mill site contains three wetland areas, two which are included in the Georgiana neighborhood. The Whites creek ravine acts as the boundary along the Whites Creek neighborhood as it enters the Ennis Creek ravine along N Ennis St. Census map relation The Georgiana Neighborhood is contained within two Census Tracts, FIPS #53009001000 and #001200. Due to the southern border of the neighborhood being along an alley, all Census Blocks along that border are shared with either Peabody Creek or Civic neighborhood. Block 1003 is shared with both Downtown and Peabody Creek neighborhoods. Community Amenities Olympic Medical Center, 9/11 Memorial Waterfront Park, Waterfront and ODT Trail, Quinn Redlin Kinter Memorial Park White’s Creek Location Bounded by the Port Angeles Harbor to the north, the boundary of Port Angeles and Clallam County to the east and south, and the general path of White Creek and Ennis Creek to the west. Environmental features Ravines within the neighborhood follow N Ennis St. to Rayonier Access Rd., then along White Creek and Ennis Creek routes which border the west and east boundary of the White’s Creek neighborhood. Wetland Hydric Soil areas are present along Melody Ln. and E 3rd St. Census map relation White’s Creek neighborhood is almost completely contained within Census Tracts FIPS #53009001200, which also contains the Civic and Mt. Angeles neighborhoods. The northern panhandle of the neighborhood, containing a Port of Port Angeles wastewater site is within Tract #001300, along with SE corners of the neighborhood located east of Ennis Creek and south of US Hwy 101. Census Block bounda ries generally align with neighborhood boundaries, with some exceptions, including Blocks 2031, 3015, and those which are drawn along White Creek with different interpretations of the creek boundary line. Community Amenities Peninsula Golf Club Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 8 MAKERS architecture and urban design Civic Location Bounded by Race St. to the west, the alley between E Front St. and E Georgiana St. to the north, the general path of White Creek and Ennis Creek to the east, and Lauridsen Blvd. to the south. Environmental features No significant geographic conditions or natural hazards. Census map designation Civic neighborhood is completely contained within Census Tracts FIPS #53009001200, which also contains Mt. Angeles and White’s Creek neighborhoods. Due to the norther border of the neighborhood being along an alley, all Census Blocks along that border are shared with Georgiana. Census Blocks which are drawn along White Creek with differ in interpretations of the creek boundary line. Community Amenities Civic Field, Rains Park, Port Angeles Fine Arts Center, Port Angeles Community Players Mt. Angeles Location The Mt. Angeles neighborhood extends south from Lauridsen Boulevard to the southern City limits, and from Hurricane Ridge Road on the west to the White's Creek ravine and the eastern City limits. Environmental features White Creek and Ennis Creek are outside of the east and west neighborhood borders. The neighborhood contains some wetland areas along Rook Dr., and a Wetland Hydric Soil area in the southern side of the Peninsula College campus. Census map relation Mt. Angeles neighborhood is completely contained within Census Tracts FIPS #53009001200, which also contains Georgiana and White’s Creek neighborhoods. All Census Blocks align with neighborhood boundaries with the exception of those drawn along White Creek, which differ in interpretations of the creek boundary line. Community Amenities Peninsula College, Franklin Elementary School Mill Creek Location The Mill Creek neighborhood extends south from Park Street to the southern City boundary, and from the western City boundary to Race Street and Hurricane Ridge Road on the east. Environmental features The southern half of the neighborhood contains ten Wetland Hydric Soil areas, some framing existing wetlands, including the Peabody reservoir. Significant ravines are along the neighborhood edges, with the Peabody Creek ravine to the east, and Valley Creek to the west. The Mill Creek ravine bisects the neighborhood from Laurel and Viewcrest up Old Mill Rd to the City’s boundary. Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 9 MAKERS architecture and urban design Census map relation Mill Creek neighborhood is completely contained within Census Tracts FIPS #53009001100, which also contains the Lauridsen neighborhood. All Census blocks are within neighborhood boundaries except Block 3006, which is located outside of the Port Angeles city boundary in the Western UGA, and Block 1012, which is located in Census Tract FIPS #53009001500. Community Amenities Port Angeles Highschool, Olympic National Park, Peabody Creek Trail Lauridsen Location Bounded by Park Ave. to the south, Port Angeles boundary and Clallam County to the west, Lauridsen Blvd. to the north, and Race St. to the east. Environmental features Significant ravines are along the neighborhood edges, with the Peabody Creek ravine to the east, and Valley Creek to the west. Census map relation Lauridsen neighborhood is completely contained within Census Tracts FIPS #53009001100, which also contains the Mill Creek neighborhoods. All Census blocks are within neighborhood boundaries except Block 1000, which is located in Census Tract FIPS #53009001500. A very small portion of Block 1001 intersects with both Cherry Hill and Jefferson neighborhoods at the corner of Lauridsen Blvd. and Lincoln St. Community Amenities Lions Club Park, Boy and Girls Club, North Olympic Library System Jefferson Location The Jefferson neighborhood is located between Lincoln Street on the west and Race Street on the east. It is bounded to the south by Lauridsen Boulevard, and on the north by the 8th Street corridor. Environmental features Peabody Creek ravine runs along the eastern end of the neighborhood boundary. Census map relation The Jefferson neighborhood is completely contained within Census Tracts FIPS #53009001000, with the exception of a very small portion of Block 1001 that intersects with both Cherry Hill and Lauridsen neighborhoods at the corner of Lauridsen Blvd. and Lincoln St. Community Amenities Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 10 MAKERS architecture and urban design Peabody Creek Location The Peabody Creek neighborhood extends east of Lincoln Street to Race Street, and from 8th Street on the south to the Georgiana/Front alley on the north. Peabody Creek Ravine divides the neighborhood diagonally from the southeast to the northwest. Environmental features Peabody Creek ravine runs diagonally through the neighborhood. Census map relation The Peabody Creek neighborhood is completely contained within Census Tracts FIPS #53009001000. Due to the norther border of the neighborhood being along an alley, Census Blocks 1004, 1016, and 1017 are shared with Georgiana. Block 1007 is shared with Downtown. Block 1003 is shared with both Downtown and Georgiana neighborhoods. Community Amenities Peabody Creek Trail, Jesse Webster Park, Olympic Peninsula YMCA, Port Angeles Senior and Community Center, City Hall, Erikson Park, Jefferson Elementary Cherry Hill Location The Cherry Hill neighborhood extends from Lincoln Street on the east to Valley Creek on the west, and from Lauridsen Boulevard on the south to marine bluff on the north. Environmental features Valley Creek ravine on the east of S Valley St. runs along the western neighborhood boundary. Census map relation The Cherry Hill neighborhood is completely contained within Census Tracts FIPS #53009000900, along with the Pine Hill neighborhood and part of Downtown. Cherry Hill shares Census Block 1005 with Downtown. A very small portion of Block 1001 intersects with both Cherry Hill, Lauridsen, and Jefferson neighborhoods at the corner of Lauridsen Blvd. and Lincoln St. Census Blocks that are drawn along Valley Creek differ from the neighborhood boundary in regard to interpretations of the creek boundary line. Community Amenities Hazel Porter Kiel Park, Queen of Angels School, 5th and Oak Park, James Park Viewpoint, Pine Hill Location The Pine hill neighborhood extends from the center of Valley Creek ravine on the east to the center of Tumwater Creek ravine on the west. The northern boundary of the neighborhood is the marine bluff, and the southern boundary is Highway 101. Environmental features The neighborhood is bordered to the north by land categorized as Marine type hazard, then with ravines that run the complete length of the neighborhood, Tumwater Creek to the west and Valley Creek to the east. Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 11 MAKERS architecture and urban design Census map relation The Pine Hill neighborhood is almost completely contained within Census Tracts FIPS #53009000900, except for the SW-most corner of the neighborhood within #000800, which contains most of the Lincoln Park neighborhood. This corner contains three Census Block, two of which overlap with the Southwest neighborhood northern boundary line. Census Block 2019, a Block of significant size, does not align with the southern boundary of the neighborhood, impeding into the Southwest neighborhood and drawn along US Hwy 101. Other inconsistencies with Blocks are drawn along Valley Creek and Tumwater Creek and differ from the neighborhood boundary in regard to interpretations of the creek boundary line. Community Amenities Wilson Park, Elks Playfield, Harbor View Location Bounded by the rough southern boundary line of the Harbor planning area and Ediz Hook neighborhood to the north, Truck Rt. to the east, 8th St. to the south, and I St. to the west. Environmental features The neighborhood is bordered to the north by land categorized as Marine type hazard, then with Tumwater Creek ravine to the west. The neighborhood contains Shane Park. Census map relation The Harbor View neighborhood is completely contained within Census Tracts FIPS #53009000800. All Census Blocks closest and adjacent to Port Angeles Harbor are shared with other neighborhoods, Including Blocks 3000 and 3001 with Ediz Hook, and Block 3005, which overlaps with both Crown and Ediz Hook neighborhoods. Block 2014 has a small overlap with the Lincoln Park neighborhood northern boundary line. Community Amenities Shane Park, A Street Viewpoint Lincoln Park Location The second largest neighborhood, bounded by 8th St. to the north, Truck Rt. to the east, US Hwy 101 excluding a buffer to the south, with the western neighborhood boundary following the Port Angeles city boundary until the corner of Lauridsen Blvd. and L St., then up L St. to the corner of L St. and M St., east on 10th St., to the corner of 10th St. and 8th St. Environmental features The neighborhood contains Lincoln Park to the SW, Stevens Middle School forested land in the center, and Tumwater Creek ravine along the eastern neighborhood boundary. Census map relation The Harbor View neighborhood is completely contained within Census Tracts FIPS #53009000800. Census Block inconsistencies occur along the eastern boundary where they are drawn along Tumwater Creek and differ from the neighborhood Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 12 MAKERS architecture and urban design boundary in regard to interpretations of the creek boundary line. All three of the Census Blocks along the southern neighborhood boundary line are shared with the Southwest neighborhood, including Blocks 1013, 1021, and 1015. The majority of Block 1011 is outside of the Port Angeles city boundary within the western UGA. Community Amenities Stevens Middle School, Lincoln Park and Clallam County Fairgrounds, Wolverton Park Southwest Location The Southwest neighborhood is bounded to the North by US Hwy 101, including a buffer to the north of the highway. The remainder of its dimension follows the outline of the Port Angeles city boundary. The Southwest neighborhood is the most isolated, with the majority of the neighborhood not bordering any other neighborhood, and includes the entire area annexed into the City in 2005. Environmental features The east-most portion of the neighborhood, which extends as a buffer south of US Hwy 101, includes some of Tumwater Creek Ravine. The main portion of the neighborhood contains some wetlands and Wetland Hydric Soil areas. The majority of this site is industrial uses, with logging and asphalt activity. Census map relation The Southwest neighborhood is mostly contained within Census Tract FIPS #53009001500, which accounts for the areas located south of US Hwy 101. The areas of the Southwest neighborhood that are north of US Hwy 101 are in FIPS #00070, #00080, and #00090. Community Amenities None. Map Comparisons The following maps show how the existing 18 neighborhood boundaries compare to other maps that are often used to help identify different neighborhoods. Nextdoor Defined Neighborhoods Nextdoor is a popular hyperlocal social networking service. Members must verify their home address and are connected to messaging boards shared by other members in their immediate geographic proximity. The service is often used to report or comment on local events, find lost pets, exchange goods, and recommend services. The first Nextdoor users in a particular area can volunteer to be “founding members” with the ability to define the neighborhood boundary and choose the neighborhood name. However, Nextdoor also “…reserves the right to make corrections to names and boundaries based on feedback from other neighbors or to adhere to Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 13 MAKERS architecture and urban design Nextdoor's guidelines on neighborhood names. Nextdoor boundaries and names should, to the extent possible, reflect the traditionally accepted boundaries and names for a neighborhood.”2 Therefore, many of the names of neighborhoods on Nextdoor were developed by members. The map below shows Port Angeles on the Nextdoor map and variety of names that differ from the City’s map. There are multiple neighborhoods defined by cross streets only. Some unique or alternative names that differ from the City map are Marina District, Fairmount, Shane Park, Bridges, Elks Park, Peabody Heights, Viewcrest, South Ennis, and Golf Course Road. Nextdoor Defined Neighborhoods Neighborhood boundaries and named as defined by social network service “NextDoor”. Boundaries and neighborhood names differ significantly from Comprehensive Plan-determined neighborhoods. 2 Source link. Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 14 MAKERS architecture and urban design Census Units Census enumeration units include tracts, block groups, and blocks, each serving different levels of data collection. Tracts are the largest, covering several thousand residents. Block groups cluster multiple blocks within a tract, while blocks are the smallest units, often aligning with city streets. These units help analyze demographic and economic trends, though their boundaries may not always match local neighborhoods or school district boundaries, as in the case of Port Angeles. The relationship between U.S. Census boundaries and neighborhood boundaries in Port Angeles varies, with many neighborhoods largely contained within a single Census Tract but with notable exceptions at the Census Block level. For example, several neighborhoods, including Airport, West End, Crown, and Ediz Hook, are primarily within Census Tract FIPS #53009000700, though specific blocks like Block 3001 and Blocks 1007/1010 are shared or misaligned. In contrast, neighborhoods such as Downtown and Georgiana span multiple tracts, reflecting overlapping boundaries where Census Blocks are sometimes split among adjacent areas. Natural features and local interpretations of boundaries, such as creeks and alleys, further complicate the alignment, resulting in shared blocks and boundary discrepancies across various neighborhoods. Census Enumeration Units vs. Existing Neighborhood Boundaries Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 15 MAKERS architecture and urban design The City of Port Angeles shown with existing neighborhood boundaries and names, compared against three Census enumeration units: Block, Block Group, and Tract. School District Attendance Boundaries The elementary school boundaries in Port Angeles generally follow neighborhood boundaries but have some notable overlaps and divisions. While some school zones align neatly with neighborhoods, others, such as those for Roosevelt and Jefferson Elementary, split neighborhoods like Peabody Creek, Pine Hill, and Downtown. This leads to mixed school assignments within a single neighborhood. Major roads and natural features play a key role in shaping both school and neighborhood boundaries. • Franklin Elementary feeder area serves the Crown, West End, and Ediz Hook neighborhoods, with its boundary closely following W 10th St and extending to the western waterfront. • Roosevelt Elementary feeder area covers Peabody Creek, Civic, Georgiana, and Jefferson neighborhoods, with its boundary aligned along Lauridsen Blvd and Race St, cutting across multiple neighborhoods. • Jefferson Elementary feeder area serves Cherry Hill, Pine Hill, and parts of Downtown, with its zone extending across Marine Dr and E 5th St, overlapping with the downtown area. Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 16 MAKERS architecture and urban design • Dry Creek Elementary feeder area encompasses Airport, Lincoln Park, and Southwest, extending southwest beyond the city limits along US Hwy 101. • Hamilton Elementary feeder area primarily serves White’s Creek, with a boundary that follows the easternmost city limits near Ennis Creek. Existing School District Feeder Zones and Schools vs. Neighborhoods The City of Port Angeles shown with existing neighborhood boundaries and names, compared against Port Angeles School District feeder zones and school locations. Neighborhood Programs Case Studies Existing Neighborhood Efforts in Port Angeles Mount Pleasant Community Association (MPCA) (Unincorporated) This non-profit organization serves approximately 500 families in the Mount Pleasant community and is located along Mt. Pleasant Rd. about one mile south of Port Angeles’ east UGA. The association focuses on educational, benevolent, and social activities. MPCA Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 17 MAKERS architecture and urban design organizes various social events for residents, including community gatherings at their Community Hall. In the event of a disaster, the Mount Pleasant Community Hall would function as the area emergency center for assembling resources, providing a place of safety, and as our communication center. The Mount Pleasant Neighborhood Emergency Response Team (NERT) coordinator, the officers of the Mount Pleasant Community Association, and the 25 NERT leaders would provide emergency management and coordination. Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 18 MAKERS architecture and urban design Big Spring Spruce Up (Downtown) The Port Angeles Chamber of Commerce invites individuals, families, service groups, and people of all ages to join in on a community cleanup of the Waterfront District downtown to help with pulling weeds, collecting trash, power washing, and lots of other tasks to beautify the area. Neighborhood Programs in Other Washington Cities Program Summaries Tacoma The City of Tacoma Neighborhood Council Program is supported by the Neighborhood and Community Services Department and has been in place since 1992. The Program contains eight Neighborhood Councils supported by one larger Community Council (see map below). Neighborhood Councils designate at least one representative to the Community Council to communicate with the City regarding programs, policies, and priorities affecting their neighborhoods. Each neighborhood Council is registered as an independent, non-profit organization, which allows anyone who lives, works, or owns a business or property within the Neighborhood Council area to join. The City Council determines the boundaries of the Neighborhood Councils, and the overarching Community Council will directly address City Council if there are requests to alter Neighborhood Council boundaries or add an additional Neighborhood Council. There may be a maximum of five Neighborhood Councils per City Council District. The Program Standards and Guidelines were created by the City Manager, and maintaining compliance with these standards allows the City to provide funding and support to the Neighborhood Council Program. Funding opportunities include operational funding (basic expenses), capacity funding (training, events, projects), and grant opportunities. Within the Standards and Guidelines, the goals of the Neighborhood Councils include increasing residents that participate in volunteering and voting and increasing the diversity of leadership positions and participation at public meetings to reflect the community. Tacoma Neighborhood Council Program Standards and Guidelines HERE Tacoma Municipal Code Chapter 1.45, Neighborhood Councils HERE Tacoma Neighborhood Council Program, Council Names and Boundaries Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 19 MAKERS architecture and urban design City of Tacoma shown with the boundaries and names of the eight Neighborhood Councils in the Neighborhood Council Program Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 20 MAKERS architecture and urban design Seattle The City of Seattle had a formal Neighborhood District Council system starting about 1987. The City cut ties with it in 2016, the result of a refocusing towards comprehensive citywide planning (away from neighborhood planning) and a recognition that the District Council system was primarily made up of a limited segment of the overall population. Prior to the separation, there were 13 District Councils, each composed of volunteer representatives from local organizations. Each District Council would elect one member to the City Neighborhood Council, which served as an advisory body to the Mayor and City Council. Each District Council played a role in recommending street, parks, and arts/culture projects for local grant funding. About $1.2 million per year was spent in staff support through the Department of Neighborhoods. Another key role of the District Councils was being forms for City departments to provide presentations and information on projects and programs, helping to get the word out on a variety of issues. Some versions of neighborhood organizations still exist, primarily consisting of community councils. These neighborhood organizations are independent of any government structure, and contribute to their communities through volunteering, activism, and representation in other programs. The Community Involvement Commission, which was formed after the dissolution of the District Council system, is made up of 16 members; half who are appointed by the City Council and roughly half are appointed by the Mayor, plus a youth position. This commission advises the Mayor, City Council, and the Seattle Department of Neighborhoods and other City departments on outreach and engagement strategies. Other neighborhood groups with specific focuses are mentioned in later sections as they relate to different organization topics. Capitol Hill Neighborhood Community Council HERE Seattle Community Involvement Commission HERE “Seattle To Cut Official Ties With Neighborhood District Councils”, article HERE Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 21 MAKERS architecture and urban design Spokane There are 29 Neighborhood Councils within three Districts in the City of Spokane (see map below). The program was created in 2000. Any resident, business owner, or property owner within neighborhood boundaries may attend the Councils’ regular meetings. Neighborhood Council boundaries may extend beyond city limits, but official decisions are only to be determined by members within City limits. These Neighborhood Councils are independent organizations, each represented by two City Council members, and with one representative at the Community Assembly, a coalition of representatives from the Neighborhood Councils. The Community Assembly facilitates open communication between the City and Neighborhood Councils. The Office of Neighborhood Services acts as the staff support for the Neighborhood Councils Program, and as the liaison between the neighborhood programs and City government. Spokane Neighborhood Councils HERE Spokane Community Assembly HERE Spokane Neighborhood Councils City of Spokane shown with the 29 existing neighborhood names and boundaries. Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 22 MAKERS architecture and urban design Vancouver The City of Vancouver, WA, has officially recognized Neighborhood Associations since 1975. Currently, there are 71 officially recognized associations, supported by the Office of Neighborhoods (see map below). Neighborhood Association membership is open to anyone living or working within the neighborhood boundaries. There are many City-funded resources and programs for these associations to choose to participate in, including a having a designated Neighborhood Police Officer, neighborhood clean-up programs, support for neighborhood activities, newsletter printing and mailings, neighborhood leadership training, and a Neighborhood Liaison appointed by the City Manager. In addition to a Neighborhood Liaison, each Neighborhood Association has officers that are elected to represent the Neighborhood Association to the City and in the community. Vancouver Neighborhood Associations HERE Neighborhood Associations Resources HERE Vancouver Neighborhood Associations City of Vancouver, WA, shown with Neighborhood Association boundaries. Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 23 MAKERS architecture and urban design Environmental Stewardship Projects Tacoma • Sustainability Small Grants: The City of Tacoma offers grants up to $5,000 to non-profit organizations and residents for projects that protect and restore the local environment. • Tacoma Neighborhoods Together: A non-profit organization supporting art and beautification efforts, including neighborhood cleanups and environmental projects. Seattle • Seattle Stewards Program: Supports community-based restoration efforts, engaging residents in urban greenspace maintenance and environmental education. • Environmental Grants Program: The Port of Seattle offers funding for community-led environmental projects in South King County neighborhoods. • Seattle Neighborhood Greenways: Non-profit coalition of neighborhood groups that plan and advocate for safe streets for all, with a focus on walking and bicycling. • Sustainable Ballard: Sustainable Ballard is a neighborhood non-profit that educates and engages neighbors to take action to live more sustainably both individually and collectively. Spokane • Spokane Riverkeeper: Dedicated to protecting and restoring the health of the Spokane River through advocacy, education, and community engagement. • Spokane Conservation District: Offers urban forestry career development and educational programs in Airway Heights and Spokane Valley. Vancouver • Environmental Grants Program: The City of Vancouver provides grants to community groups for projects that build connections and foster neighborhood pride, including environmental initiatives. • Neighborhood Association Community Gardens • Recycling Workshops: This can be attended by Neighborhood Association members. Neighborhood cleanups Tacoma • Sustainability Small Grants: Provides funding for neighborhood cleanups and beautification projects led by residents and non-profit organizations. • Tacoma Neighborhoods Together: Supports art and beautification efforts, including neighborhood cleanups to enhance community spaces. • LitterFree 253: Annual citywide litter cleanup sponsored by the Community Councils of Tacoma. • Eastside Neighborhood Advisory Council of Tacoma (ENACT): Group of engaged volunteer citizens. The Safety & Beautification Committee volunteers with cleaning projects including Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 24 MAKERS architecture and urban design de-paving projects, graffiti removal and cover-up, community cleanups, and mural installation. • Regular Neighborhood Council Cleanups: Regularly scheduled clean-ups by Neighborhood Councils (example: Blueberry Park cleanup every Sunday morning with the South End Neighborhood Council). • Neighborhood Walks: The South End Neighborhood Council guides short monthly walks around South End hot spots where they focus on identifying potential solutions and ideas for neighborhood improvements as they pick up litter along the way. • Adopt-A-Spot: Supported by community councils, the Neighborhood Litter Patrol Program teams up with Tidy-Up Tacoma to help keep neighborhoods clean. Participants receive supplies and disposal assistance to support their cleanup efforts. Seattle • Adopt-A-Street Program: Empowers residents to keep their neighborhoods clean by adopting local streets and organizing regular litter pickups. • Seattle Public Utilities Spring Neighborhood Stewardship: Opportunities for neighborhood cleanup learning activities and events, encouraging community groups to participate in beautification projects. • One Seattle Day of Service: Joining together a diverse group of over 100 public, private, and non-profit partners and organizations, the City provides a wide array of service opportunities including cleaning and beautification, gardening and restoration, helping neighbors in need, and more. • Neighborhood Association Cleanup Events • East Ballard Neighborhood Association • Friends of Green Lake Clean-Up Spokane • SpoCanopy: Engages community members in tree planting and maintenance, contributing to cleaner and greener neighborhoods. • Spokane Riverkeeper: Organizes riverbank cleanup and restoration programs along the Spokane River. • Neighborhood Council Cleanups: • Hillyard Community Cleanup • Clean-up Coordinator Program (Neighborhood Services) Vancouver • Neighborhood Park Stewards: Volunteers maintain and improve local parks, organizing cleanup events and educational programs. • Community and Neighborhood Grants Program: Provides funding for neighborhood associations to host cleanup events, enhancing community engagement. • Neighborhood Association Cleanups • Bella Vista Cleanup Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 25 MAKERS architecture and urban design • Burton Evergreen Cleanup Tacoma • Proctor District Events: Hosts community gatherings, including seasonal festivals and markets that bring neighbors together. • Neighborhood Block Parties: Local associations organize block parties to foster community spirit and neighborly connections. • Tacoma Porchfest: Free, walkable music festival where front porches become musical stages. This event is hosted by the Tacoma Central Neighborhood Council. • Neighborhood & City combined events: New Tacoma neighborhood council joins forces with City organization including the City of Tacoma, Tacoma Light Rail, Tacoma Public Library. Seattle • Seattle Night Out: An annual event encouraging neighbors to gather for block parties, fostering community spirit and crime prevention awareness. • Neighborhood Picnics: Various community councils organize picnics and social gatherings to strengthen neighborhood ties. • East Ballard Potluck, Spring Egg Hunt • Garage Sales: Crown Hill Neighborhood Association Annual Garage Sale • Community Festivals: Neighborhood associations host festivals featuring food, art, music, and activities for residents. • East Ballard Fall Festival • • Fremont Neighborhood Council Ugly Sweater Wine Walk • Queen Anne Community Council Tree Lighting Spokane • Neighborhood Council Events: Councils organize social events like picnics and outdoor movies to strengthen community bonds. • Bemiss Outdoor Concerts • Riverside Community Meals • Community Festivals: Local associations host festivals featuring food, music, and activities for residents. • Logan Neighborhood Block Party • Cliff Cannon Neighborhood Block Party Vancouver • Community and Neighborhood Grants Program: Provides funding for neighborhood associations to host events such as picnics and block parties, enhancing community engagement. Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 26 MAKERS architecture and urban design • Neighborhood Association Events • Bagley Downs Neighborhood Association Holiday Market • Bella Vista Neighborhood Association Annual Picnic • Burnt Bridge Creek Neighborhood Association Annual Picnic • Cimarron Neighborhood Association Garage Sale • DuBois Park Neighborhood 4th of July Parade & BBQ Emergency Preparedness The Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) program trains volunteers in basic disaster response skills such as fire safety, light search and rescue, first aid, emergency communication, and team organization. They can also assist with communicating disaster preparedness information, performing wellness checks, assisting displaced residents, and supporting logistics at emergency shelters. The program started in the 1980’s in California for earthquake preparedness, and it is now coordinated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the nonprofit National CERT Association that was recently established in 2019. The program is implemented at the local level by volunteers, who may be self-initiating or who may be organized by a paid volunteer coordinator staff person at a city or county government agency. Typically a CERT is based on a particular neighborhood. CERT can also be based at school campuses and workplaces. Coordination by local government is important to implement CERT because: • CERT volunteers are most effective when they receive training and are certified • Drills and exercises should be regularly scheduled to help volunteers stay updated on their skills • Good communication with public safety agencies (police, fire, medical) is necessary for effective disaster response • Some types of emergency response requires proper equipment and supplies that may not otherwise be available or affordable to individuals In Washington State, CERT teams are promoted or organized by local governments like Bothell, Tukwila, and Snohomish County. Other are listed below. Examples of recent CERT activations in Washington include wildfire and flood events where CERT volunteers have assisted with evacuations, shelter staffing, and disseminating information. It is anticipated that CERT could be an important resource for a large “Cascadia earthquake” that is anticipated to eventually strike the Pacific Northwest. General • Map Your Neighborhood/Be 2 Weeks Ready Program: currently being developed by partners in Washington and Oregon. Tacoma Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan Update – Neighborhood Analysis Report Page 27 MAKERS architecture and urban design • Community Emergency Response Team (CERT): Offers training to residents on disaster preparedness and basic response skills, fostering a resilient community. Seattle • Seattle Neighborhoods Actively Prepare (SNAP): Provides tools and strategies for neighborhoods to prepare collectively for emergencies. • Green Lake Community Council • Emergency Hubs: Pre-determined locations where community members can gather to exchange information and resources during disasters. Spokane • Disaster Preparedness Resources: • Spokane County Disaster Assistance Response Team (DART)Started to encourage more volunteer participation during major emergencies and disasters. Requires FEMA and Emergency Management training. Vancouver • Clark County CERT: Program for people of all ages, sizes, and physical abilities to learn valuable basic skills needed during an emergency. Other Seattle • Senior Programs: Phinney Neighborhood Association programs include a range of programs and services that serve critical needs. This includes support networks of volunteer services, business referrals, social engagement, a memory loss program, social services programs, and asocial connection program. • Childcare Programs: Phinney Neighborhood Association programs for kids including Whittier Kids, Phinney Neighborhood Preschool Co-op, and Ballard Preschool Co-op. Offerings include preschool, afterschool, and summer camp options. Port Angeles 2025 Comprehensive Plan – Conservation Element Page 1 5 Conservation Element Port Angeles 2025 Comprehensive Plan – Conservation Element Page 2 Introduction The Conservation Element establishes the importance of quality of life to the people of Port Angeles. A clean, healthy, and diverse natural environment along with a variety of historical and cultural amenities are critical elements of a high quality community. As with other elements, this chapter provides a goal, policy and action framework to support Port Angeles' long-range vision related to conservation. This includes efforts to optimize the city's relationship with its natural historic, and cultural setting by protecting and enhancing the environment and identifying and conserving sitres and entities of historic or cultural significance. Actions related to conservation goals and policies are included in Chapter 1110, Implementation. i Likely no appendix items in this section unless direction is given for mapping historic sites, culturally significant lands, areas with a need for greater environmental conservation and/or enhancement, etc. Appendix X – Title reference. Port Angeles 2025 Comprehensive Plan – Conservation Element Page 3 i New text to be reviewed by City to confirm it aligns with the other Elements Conservation and Sustainability Priorities Protecting Natural Resources Today for a Healthier Tomorrow As part of the visioning process for the comprehensive plan, Port Angeles residents were asked to rate the importance of various environmental initiatives. The results revealed clear community priorities that are seen as key to improving quality of life over the next 20 years: • Waste reduction and recycling programs • Water conservation efforts • Tree planting initiatives for streets and parks • Expanding urban green spaces • Upgrading City infrastructure to be more resilient to climate change • Promoting renewable energy development (solar, wind, tidal, etc.) • Improving green transportation options (e.g., bike lanes, public transit, electric vehicle infrastructure) • Neighborhoods with amenities within walking distance The highest-rated priorities included waste reduction and recycling, followed by infrastructure upgrades to support climate resilience, and water conservation. These results reflect a shared community vision for environmental responsibility, resilience, and sustainable growth. The following goals and policies build on these priorities to guide future conservation efforts in Port Angeles. Port Angeles 2025 Comprehensive Plan – Conservation Element Page 4 Goals and Policies i The following goals and policies utilize the previous numbering system from the last plan (Conservation Element used to be 7 but is currently 5 in this update). Goals and policies will need to be renumbered after the City approval of changes. Goal G-7A Promote sustainable development and land use that is compatible with the overall natural environment, historical, archaeological, and cultural amenities. Policy P-7A.01 Require all development, including the location and design of all structures and open space areas, to be compatible with the unique physical features and natural amenities of the land and complement the environment in which it is placed, while recognizing the rights of private ownership. i Removed Policy P-7A.02 as a similar one exists in the Land Use chapter and was similar to P- 7A.03. Policy P-7A.02 Promote compatibility between the land and its use by regulating the intensity of the land use. i Removed Policy P-7A.03 as it is similar to P-7A.05. Policy P-7A.03 Adopt development criteria, which promote the use of innovative design techniques to provide for the use of the land in a manner compatible with any unique physical features or valuable natural, historical, and/or cultural amenities. Policy P-7A.04 Building density should decrease as natural constraints increase. Policy P-7A.05 Establish minimum and maximum standards for development of properties, which contain or adjoin critical areas for the purpose of protecting such areas and enhancing their natural functions. Port Angeles 2025 Comprehensive Plan – Conservation Element Page 5 Policy P-7A.06 Regulate site design, preparation, and development to avoid or minimize damage to wetlands and other environmentally sensitive areas. Policy P-7A.07 Use regionally consistent requirements for industrial and commercial sewer discharge pretreatment and require new indirect dischargers to locate where appropriate sewer service can be made available. Policy P-7A.08 Designate open space areas to preserve major or unique physical features, to serve as natural greenbelts and wildlife corridors, and to establish an urban edge to the PAUGA. Policy P-7A.09 Coordinate its environmental regulations with County, State, and Federal regulations to simplify the permitting process and to reduce associated costs to the land user. i Removed 7A.10 from Conservation and moved to Climate Element Policy P-7A.10 Review all new development for impacts on climate change and adaptation to sea level rise. Policy P-7A.11 Implement site-specific requirements for individual development proposals to mitigate any negative impacts created by the development, particularly to an area identified as an environmentally sensitive area. G-7B To protect and enhance the area's unique physical features, its natural, historical, archaeological, and cultural amenities, and the overall environment. P-7B.01 Maintain and preserve the City’s unique physical features and natural amenities, such as creeks, streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands, ravines, bluffs, shorelines, and fish and wildlife habitats and including its air and water quality from new and existing sources including climatic change impacts. P-7B.02 Promote and highlight Port Angeles' plentiful natural beauty, amenities and cultural history. P-7B.03 Recognizing the functions and values of wetlands, the City should strive to achieve no net loss of wetlands. Port Angeles 2025 Comprehensive Plan – Conservation Element Page 6 i Removed 7B.04 as it is too broad and doesn’t really define what types of lands these are or where they are located. It also introduces a strange tension between public and private development. Policy P-7B.04 Preserve uniquely featured lands, which still exist in their natural states and which are notable for their aesthetic, scenic, historic, or ecological features. Prohibit any private or public development, which would destroy such qualities, or would subject features to damage from climatic change, while recognizing the rights of private ownership. i Removed 7B.05 and 7B.06 because they are too similar to 7B.01 Policy P-7B.05 Enhance and preserve the quality of the City’s air and water as two of its unique physical features. Policy P-7B.06 Protect air and water quality by minimizing pollution from new and existing sources including climatic change impacts. Policy P-7B.07 Develop and implement a plan to improve water quality, which includes measures to reduce and minimize stormwater pollutants and combined sewer overflow pollutant discharges. Policy P-7B.08 Maintain and enhance the quality of water resources through the regulation of clearing, grading, dumping, discharging, and draining and the provision of flood and erosion control measures and regulations to protect wetlands and other environmentally sensitive areas. i Removed Policy P-7B.09 as it is similar to P-7B.08. Policy P-7B.09 Protect water quality and prevent erosion through the retention of existing vegetation. Policy P-7B.10 Encourage identification, preservation, and restoration of sites and structures that have historical or cultural significance. Port Angeles 2025 Comprehensive Plan – Conservation Element Page 7 i Reworded 7B.08 for clarity Policy P-7B.11 Prioritize long-term environmental benefits and impacts over short-term ones when making decisionsGive precedence to long-term environmental impacts and benefits over short-term environmental impacts and benefits. i Combined Policy P-7B.12 to include language of P-7B.14, removed P-7B.14. Policy P-7B.12 Promote and utilize environment enhancing conservation practices. Those practices may include waste reduction, use of energy efficient and conserving materials, and energy conservation techniques and should also encourage the development and use of alternative forms of energy and transportation. Including avoiding adverse impacts to archaeological sites by following and requiring best management practices for archaeological preservation. Policy P-7B.13 Reference the most recently adopted Washington State Citations of Recommended Sources of Best Available Science for Designating and Protecting Critical Areas and other research identified as more locally appropriate and applicable when available as Best Available Science in the Critical Areas Ordinance. i Combined Policy P-7B.12 to include language of P-7B.14, removed P-7B.14. Policy P-7B.14 Avoid adverse impacts to archaeological sites by following and requiring best management practices for archaeological preservation. Policy P-7B.15 Publicly recognize the many values provided by trees in an urban setting and identify opportunities to plant trees. Policy P-7B.16 Establish and implement an urban tree management program intended to retain and/or restore the overall tree canopy in the city by using plant materials as a unifying element and tool to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public, using the environmental services provided by trees to mitigate the negative effects of impervious Port Angeles 2025 Comprehensive Plan – Conservation Element Page 8 surfaces and vehicular traffic such as increased temperatures, airborne particulates, carbon dioxide, nosenoise, and stormwater runoff. Policy P-7B-17 Plant trees along residential streets, in parking lots, and in other areas as opportunities arise. Trees should be retained whenever possible and maintained using Best Management Practices as appropriate for each tree type. i P-7B.18 to be removed from Conservation and moved to Climate Policy P-7B.18 Seek strategies and technologies which reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by city facilities and operations. i Recommend to move 7B.19 to Utilities Policy P-7B.19 Promote the use of alternative energy, energy conservation technology, and smart energy grid. i New Policy to implement an urban tree management program NEW POLICY Establish and implement an urban tree management program intended to retain and/or restore the overall tree canopy in the city by using plant materials as a unifying element and tool to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public, using the environmental services provided by trees to mitigate the negative effects of impervious surfaces and vehicular traffic such as increased temperatures, airborne particulates, carbon dioxide, nose, and stormwater runoff. Goal G-7C To promote community awareness and education of the importance and responsible use of our environmental, historical, and cultural amenities, with a focus on minimally impacting these resources. Port Angeles 2025 Comprehensive Plan – Conservation Element Page 9 Policy P-7C.01 Continue to inform the public concerning the long-term benefits of protecting and improving the quality of the region's air, land, and water. Policy P-7C.02 Encourage the development and implementation of environmental, historical, and cultural awareness programs which focus on local and regional issues, including climate change impacts and preparedness. Goal G-7D To preserve and enhance the City's shoreline, its natural vegetation and wildlife and to mitigate for present and planned impacts in a manner consistent with the State Shoreline Management Act and the City's Shoreline Master Program. Policy P-7D.01 Preserve shoreline areas for future generations by restricting or prohibiting development that would interfere with the shoreline ecology or irretrievably damage shoreline resources. Policy P-7D.02 Maintain and restore riparian vegetation in shoreline areas and on tributary streams, which affect shoreline resources wherever possible. Policy P-7D.03 Employ techniques to rehabilitate degraded shorelines for the purpose of shoreline stabilization and habitat enhancement wherever possible. Policy P-7D.04 Preserve and protect aquatic habitats including shellfish habitat, and important marine vegetation by periodically evaluating and adapting fish and wildlife habitat policies and codes to address and mitigate climate risks. Policy P-7D.05 Development patterns and densities on lands adjacent to shorelines should be compatible with shoreline uses and resources and reinforce the policies of the Shoreline Management Act and the City's Shoreline Master Program. i Recommend to move 7D.06 to Utilities Policy P-7D.06 Utilize common utility corridors for urban service facilities located in shoreline areas. Port Angeles 2025 Comprehensive Plan – Conservation Element Page 10 Policy P-7D.07 Designate an adequate shoreline area for water-oriented commercial and industrial development based on the Land Use Element. Policy P-7D.08 Locate shoreline uses and activities to avoid environmentally sensitive and ecologically valuable areas and to insureensure the preservation and protection of shoreline natural areas and resources. Policy P-7D.09 Locate utility facilities and rights-of-way outside of the shoreline area wherever possible or in established utility corridors, and if unavoidable, protect shoreline ecology and resources. i GOALS G-7E, G-7F and G-7G (and its associated policies) should be moved to Climate Element, with the City to confirm move. Goal G-7E Preserve culturally important resources and practices that are at risk to climate impacts such as protecting salmon populations from flooding. Protect and restore cultural and historical sites from coastal flooding and bluff erosion due to sea level rise. Policy P-7E.01 Coordinate with Tribal partners to implement regional climate resilience policies that protect culturally significant resources, land, and artifacts. Policy P-7E.02 Protect, enhance, and restore ecosystems in order to meet Tribal treaty rights and conserve culturally important consumptive and non-consumptive resources including foods, medicinal plants, and materials that could be adversely impacted by climate change. Goal G-7F Plan for and respond to extreme heat hazards on human health such as vector-borne illnesses, increased pollution, and increased heat-related illnesses, deaths, and hospitalizations. Policy P-7F.01 Consider habitat reduction and population control for arthropod disease vectors (e.g., mosquitos, ticks) and Port Angeles 2025 Comprehensive Plan – Conservation Element Page 11 zoonotic disease reservoirs (i.e., rodents) using integrated pest-management methods. Policy P-7F.02 Develop and implement a wildfire smoke resilience strategy in partnership with local residents, emergency management officials, regional clean air agency officials, and other stakeholders. Policy P-7F.03 Protect air and water quality by minimizing pollution from new and existing sources and those exacerbated by climate change drivers like extreme heat, flooding, and sea level rise. Goal G-7G Protect and preserve ecosystems by increasing resilience to climate hazards such as heat, flooding, drought, pest outbreaks, sea level rise, and reduced snowpack that pose a risk to forest productivity, fish and wildlife habitats, and water quality. Policy P-7G.01 Develop an identification and monitoring program for urban trees to analyze risks or impacts of pests and disease, factoring in climate impacts. CED Building Report - April 2025 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2024 YTD 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 $0.00 $0.00 $700,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,100,000.00 4 5 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 $352,600.00 $100,636.00 $71,652.00 $193,541.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,641,877.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $238,448.00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $2,632,599.00 $0.00 $0.00 $69,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $65,000.00 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $295,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $352,000.00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 $800,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200,000.00 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $250,000.00 $0.00 $282,354.00 $240,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 $718,694.00 $0.00 $120,000.00 $570,860.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $655,052.00 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 $0.00 $0.00 $282,659.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $408,684.00 18 27 35 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 $332,185.00 $318,083.00 $742,902.00 $416,350.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080,845.00 Comm 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Res $16,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $24,556.00 30 32 44 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 127 $5,102,578.00 $418,719.00 $2,199,567.00 $1,800,251.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,766,462.00 3 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 $67,450.71 $32,495.68 $59,192.12 $49,188.64 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $189,071.38000100000000015*2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6*2 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6*2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2*0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0*0 7 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 19*6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $9,521,115.00 $208,327.15 3 $31,500.00 149 11 $1,409,554.00 3 $282,659.00 107 $1,809,520.00 2 $800,000.00 3 $772,354.00 5 $0.00 2 $295,000.00 0 $0.00 2 $2,702,099.00 0 *The pending units are in various stages of staff review. Additionally, not all applicants have submitted a complete application at this time. While we expect the majority to advance through the review process, it is possible that some may experience the need for additional review. Dwelling Units - Single Family Dwelling Units-Manufactured Home Dwelling Units - Multi Family (3+) Total Dwelling Units Transitional Housing Units Repair and Alteration Total Permits Issued Total Construction Valuation 2025 YTD Dwelling Units - Duplex New Construction Repair and Alteration New Multi Family New Manufactured Home Dwelling Units - ADU Demolition and Moving Certificate of Occupancy 1 $700,000.00 21 $718,429.00 Permit Fees Paid Comm Ind Public Res New Construction Repair and Alteration New Construction New Single Family New Accessory Structure Repair and Alteration CED Affordable Housing Report - April 2025 Type JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2025 YTD 2024 YTD SUT - HB 1406 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SUT - HB 1590 $0.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 $14,999.00 FWP $39,666.66 $0.00 $17,444.82 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $57,111.48 $109,980.84 NICE- Small Scale $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,810.39 NICE - Medium Scale $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 NICE - Large Scale $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL CITY INVESTMENTS $39,666.66 $50,000.00 $17,444.82 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $107,111.48 $130,790.23 PRP 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4*8 MFTE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0*8 Key SUT- HB 1406 SUT- HB 1590 FWP NICE - Small Scale NICE - Medium Scal NICE - Large Scale PRP MFTE Multi Family Tax Exemption. Contracts are shown in the month they were executed between developer and City, minimum number of estimated new dwelling units listed. Final dwelling unit counts will be determined at permitting/approval phase, and will be detailed on the monthly Building Report.* Please Note: City staff invest considerable time to proactively engage with prospective housing developers in order to amplify these critical City programs. This report only includes one stage of this important process. Fee Waiver Program. The costs of 25 permit types are waived by the City for all infill and multifamily housing projects. New Improvements for Community Enhancement of Neighborhoods Projects (≤ $14,999). Grants are shown in the month that the contract was fully executed between the developer and the City. Sales and Use Tax - HB 1406. Grants are shown in the month that the contract was fully executed between the developer and the City. Sales and Use Tax - HB 1590. Grants are shown in the month that the contract was fully executed between the developer and the City. New Improvements for Community Enhancement of Neighborhoods Projects ($15,000-$24,999). Grants are shown in the month that the contract was fully executed between the developer and the City. New Improvements for Community Enhancement of Neighborhoods Projects (≥ $25,000). Grants are shown in the month that the contract was fully executed between the developer and the City. Permit Ready Plans. Plans are shown in the month they were shared with prospective developer, minimum number of estimated new dwelling units listed. Final dwelling unit counts will be determined at permitting/approval phase, and will be detailed on the monthly Building Report.* Port Angeles Planning Commission Meeting MAY 28, 2025 Neighborhood Boundaries Update PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2 Neighborhood Boundaries Background Tasked by the City Council to review and update the neighborhoods the City has named and identified. Goal Ensure that neighborhood delineations are meaningful to residents and accurately reflect local physical features and social connections. PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3 Neighborhood Boundaries Summary Scope Review and revise the current neighborhood boundaries and names to better align with both the natural geography and the identities perceived by the community. Process Compare current neighborhood boundaries with Census boundaries, school district feeder zones, and NextDoor neighborhoods. Interview other cities, including Renton, Spokane, and Vancouver, about their neighborhood programs. PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 4 Summary of Key Findings •Boundaries vs. Identity: Official neighborhood lines follow land use and geography, but true community identity often comes from social connections. Revisions should reflect local experiences. •Alignment Challenges: Neighborhoods don’t always match school zones or Census boundaries. Coordination across these can improve planning. •Model Programs: Cities like Tacoma, Seattle, Spokane, and Vancouver offer adaptable neighborhood council models for strong local engagement. PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 5 Summary of Key Findings •Community Building: Events like cleanups and social gatherings strengthen neighborhood pride and cohesion. •Emergency Preparedness: Programs like Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) can boost local resilience and emergency coordination. PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 6 PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 7 School district boundaries •Some school zones align neatly with neighborhoods. But, Roosevelt and Jefferson Elementary split neighborhoods like Peabody Creek, Pine Hill, and Downtown. Leads to mixed school assignments within a single neighborhood. •Major roads and natural features play a key role in shaping both school and neighborhood boundaries. PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 8 NextDoor-defined neighborhoods •There are multiple neighborhoods defined by cross streets only. •Some unique or alternative names that differ from the City map are Marina District, Fairmount, Shane Park, Bridges, Elks Park, Peabody Heights, Viewcrest, South Ennis, and Golf Course Road. Key Questions Key Dividers: •Are streets like 10th, 8th, and Park Ave meaningful boundaries for neighborhoods like West End, Crown, Lincoln Park, and Mill Creek? Neighborhood Size: •Is Lincoln Park too large? Do areas between Highway 101 and Lauridsen feel part of it? Identity Overlap: •Do neighborhoods like Lincoln Park and Harbor View align more with nearby parks (Shane or Lincoln)? Sparse Areas: •Do Airport and Southwest have enough residents to define as neighborhoods, or should they be merged or left unmapped? PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 9 Key Questions Cherry Hill: •Does the area south of 8th still share identity with the bluff-top community? Peabody/Jefferson/Civic: •Are these distinct areas? Would a Peabody Creek boundary better serve City goals? Commercial Corridors: •How should corridors like First/Front Street be assigned to neighborhoods? Unincorporated Areas: •Should cohesive areas outside city limits, like Gale’s Addition, be included in neighborhood planning? PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 10 Stakeholder Advisory Committee - 5/27/25 Key Takeaways: •Exercise to identify ALL neighborhood boundaries can be difficult! •Overall consensus that a reduction in the number of neighborhoods is practical. •Neighborhoods boundaries can be defined based on emergency services, school districts, census tracts, parks and commerce watersheds, utility basins walking routes, etc. Which to use? PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 11 Next Steps Further input on neighborhood names and boundaries Online/paper surveys Further input on neighborhood names and boundaries June 12 Public Meeting Neighborhood Walking Tours June 13 Revise neighborhood boundaries & names as needed per community input. PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 12 Comprehensive Plan Discussion PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 13 Elements Reviewed PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 14 Land Use Housing Economic Development Transportation Conservation Element PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 15 Conservation Element Purpose •Protect Port Angeles’ natural, cultural, and historical assets. •Guide sustainable development and respond to climate change. Major Changes from the 2023 Amended Plan •Conservation and Sustainability: A section was added reflecting updated community priorities like waste reduction, green infrastructure, water conservation, walkability and climate resilience. •Policy Reorganization: Several climate-related goals and policies were moved from Conservation to other elements like Climate and Utilities. •Policies Removed or Consolidated: Several policies were deleted or merged for clarity or redundancy. •Urban Tree Management Emphasized: Tree-related actions were retained, consolidated, and promoted as key conservation strategies, with strengthened language on planting and preservation. PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 16 Conservation Element Key Goals •Sustainable Land Use (G-5A): Ensure development complements natural, cultural, and historic features; protect critical areas and open space. •Environmental Protection (G-5B): Preserve air, water, wetlands, and wildlife habitats; promote tree canopy, water quality, and sustainable practices. •Public Awareness (G-5C): Expand public knowledge on environmental and cultural conservation, climate impacts, and responsible stewardship. •Shoreline Stewardship (G-5D): Preserve and restore shoreline ecology and vegetation; align development with the Shoreline Management Act. Implementation •Actions embedded in Chapter 10. •Coordination with County, State, Federal, and Tribal partners. •Long-term focus on sustainability, equity, and adaptive management. PORT ANGELES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 17 2025 APA-WA PAW AWARD PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION: PURSUING HOUSING FOR ALL 9% 24% 16% 17% 27% 22% 74% 49% 62% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Owner Occupied Renter occupied All Households Severely Cost Burdened Cost Burdened Not Cost Burdened Cost Burdened Households by Tenure in Port Angeles, 2020 Source: 2016-2020 HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS). 764 696 278 98 73 15 200 344 0-30%30-50%50-80%80-100%100-120%120% +Emergency Housing PSH non PSH Net New Housing Units Needed in Port Angeles, 2020-2045 Source: Clallam County Resolution 101, 2024: Establishing growth and housing allocations for Clallam County and the incorporated city jurisdictions therein. 11-26-2024 ZONING AMENDMENT OVERVIEW 4 Pre 2016: Traditional “Character” 2017-2018: Allowing Uses 2019-2021: Housing Action Heats Up 2022-2023: Pursuing Housing for All AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM OVERVIEW 5 April 2004: New Improvement and Community Enhancement (NICE) grants were adopted February 2019: Multifamily Tax Exemption (MFTE) program adopted April 2020: Affordable Housing Sales and Use Tax (SUT) adopted June 2023: Housing Coordinator/Administrator position made permanent June 2023: Permit Ready Plans (PRP) adopted and funded through a HAPI grant November 2023: Permit Fee Waiver Program (FWP) adopted AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAMS IMPACT 2024 Affordable Housing Program Statistics Funding Awarded Locally: Sales & Use Tax Grants $819,998.00 Fee Waiver Program $365,314.18 NICE Grants $11,620.00 Total Investments $1,196,932.18 Housing Plans Distributed and Contracts Executed: Permit-Ready Plans 16 Multifamily Tax Exemption 14 Total Units 30 AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAMS IMPACT 43 66 95 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2022 2023 2024 Nu m b e r o f U n i t s Year Progress in Housing Growth 53.4% 43.9% AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAMS IMPACT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Nu m b e r o f U n i t s SFR ADU Manufactured Home Duplex Triplex/Quadplex Apartments Housing Units Permitted in Port Angeles by Type, 2014-2024 PAW PRESENTATION 10 11 12 13 14 15