HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.255 Original ContracteT Op
S«1TEs
In repl refer to SRPF
Mr. Scott McLain
City of Port Angeles
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Department of Energy
Bonneville Power Administration
P.O. Box 3621
Portland, Oregon 97208 -3621
SEP 16 1991
Dear Mr. McLain:
Subject: Modification No. A001 of Intergovernmental Agreement
No. DE- BI79- 91BP16502, Daishowa Energy Review Technical Services
A fully executed copy of the subject Modification is enclosed.
If you have any questions, please call me at (503) 230 -5064.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
Nancy Belzons
Contracting Officer's
Representative
f`s
BPA F 4220 31
(02 -91;
(Previously BPA 1398 1270 01)
P
A
R
r
t
P
A
N
T
s
S
U
E
D
1 AGREEMENT NO 2 AGREEMENT TYPE
U Interagency
DE- BI79- 91BP16502 U Intraagency
6 ORGANIZATION AND ADDRESS
City of Port Angeles
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
7 TECHNICAL CONTACT
T Scott McLain
0 8 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTACT
Scott McLain
12 THIS AGREEMENT WAS NEGOTIATED PURSUANTTO
I 131 U S.0 1535 (Federal) I X 116 U S.0 832g (Other)
Li 16 U S.0 832a(f) (Customer) U
14 TITLE AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO AND BECOME A PART OF THIS AGREEMENT
DAISHOWA ENERGY REVIEW TECHNICAL SERVICES
This Modification is issued to insert the Awardee's budget and revise the amount in
Block 15. The Awardee's letter, dated May 20, 1991, is incorporated into this Agreement.
All reimbursements for travel expenses are authorized at actual amounts where
accomodations at Federal Travel Regulation limititations are unavailable, per the
Awardee's letter dated August 19, 1991. This authorization is effective retroactively
to the date of award of this agreement.
The Statement of Work is corrected to read "50 mills" in Item No. B.3.b.3.
Previous Agreement Amount:
Decrease this Modification:
New Agreement Amount:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
AGREEMENT
3 MODIFICATION NO 4 EFFECTIVE DATE 5 PROCUREMENT REQUEST NO
PHONE NO
(206) 457 -0411
I PHONE NO
(206) 457 -0411
$100,000 NTE
(35,530)
64,470 NTE
All other Terms and Conditions remain the same.
If this Is an Intergovernmental or Customer Agreement, the provisions on the reverse of this form are a part of the Agreement
15 SUBMIT INVOICE TO
See Terms and Conditions
for billing instructions
Bonneville Power Administration
P.O. Box 3621
Portland, Oregon 97208
18 APP D BY (Signature)
NAME 8!TITLE (Type or print) v
.VS2- SRPF- 5828w) nkb
I DATE
ROKER.T J. T1 TUS DI 2Ecro2
IXI
U Customer
Intergovernmental Same as
A001 Block 19
8/30/9/
s
S
U
E
D
a
P
A
9 ORGANIZATION AND ADDRESS
DE- PR79- 91BP21441
U.S. Department of Energy
Bonneville Power Administration— SRPF
P.O. Box 3621
Portland, Oregon 97208
10 BPATECHNICAL CONTACT I PHONE NO
a Shannon Greene TBA (206) 442 -0675
Y 11 BPA ADMINISTRATIVE CONTACT I PHONE NO
Nancy Belzons SRPF (503) 230 -5064
13 AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE FROM DATE IN BLOCK 4 UNTIL
December 31, 1991
16 AMOUNT TO BE PAID BY BPA
64,470 NTE
17 ACCOUNTING INFORMATION (BPA use only)
RMI 25 GNL
DECREASE: $35,530
19 AP;'F'OVED B (Stgnaty e)
NAME TITLE (Type or pint)
Delbert S. Olenslager
Contracting Officer
T23302
I DATE
?//4/1/
C) pORT gh C�t'
‘tP
er
e itY LIGN'
Ms. Nancy Belzons
U.S. Department of Energy
Bonneville Power Administration -SRPF
P. O. Box 3621
Portland, Or. 97208
Dear Ms. Belzons:
As you know, the City of Port Angeles has selected a consultant to
perform the energy review at the Daishowa mill in Port Angeles. We
have developed a preliminary budget for the project after an
initial tour of the mill and discussion of project objectives. In
accordance with the BPA /City of Port Angeles contract No. DE -BI79-
91BP16502, the City submits the following budget for the project.
Resource Hours Rate Total
Don Flisram 330 $75 $24,750
Jim Poole 156 $100 $15,600
Mike Woodward 72 $85 6,120
Tom Meersman 60 $100 6,000
Secretarial 50 $30 1,500
City Admin. 100 $35 3,500
Travel Subsis. 6,000
Materials 1,000
Sincerely,
Total Budget: $64,470
:50„647f L
Scott McLain
Power Analyst
cc: Bob Titus, City Light Director
Shannon Green, BPA -COTR
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
321 EAST FIFTH ST P 0 BOX 1150 PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON 98362
PHONE (206) 457 -0411
May 20, 1991
AGREEMENT FOR ENERGY REVIEW
AT DAISHOWA AMERICA
PORT ANGELES MILL
1
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 2. day of /9A Y 1991,
by and between the City of Port Angeles, a Municipal Corporation of
the State of Washington (hereinafter "City and Daishowa America
Co., LTD. (hereinafter "Daishowa
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS, AGREEMENTS, TERMS,
AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE PARTIES AGREE as follows:
I. PURPOSE.
The purpose of the energy review will be to identify
electrical energy saving measures that can be achieved through the
modification or replacement of mechanical and electrical devices at
the Daishowa Port Angeles Mill "Mill given the current
production processes and product mix. It will not be the purpose
of the Energy review to suggest alterations in Daishowa's pulp and
paper making processes or to recommend changes in the grades or
quality of Daishowa's products.
II. PROTECTION OF PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.
Any information that is provided by Daishowa for use in
the Energy Review that is of a proprietary, confidential, or
business sensitive nature shall be labeled as such and shall not be
disclosed or provided to the public. Any reports produced that
contain information that is proprietary or confidential to Daishowa
and which should not be released to the public shall be labeled as
follows:
The title page shall have the following legend:
"This energy review includes data that shall not be disclosed
outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used or
disclosed in whole or in part for any purpose other than to
evaluate this Energy Review. This restriction does not limit
the Government's right to use information contained in this
Energy Review if it is obtained from another source without
restriction. The data subject to this restriction are
contained in pages
Each page that contains restricted data shall be marked with
the following legend:
"Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject
to the restriction on the title page of this Project
Summary /Proposal."
III. COST.
Funding for this Energy Review will be provided by the
Bonneville Power Administration through a contract with Port
Angeles City Light. Daishowa will not provide funding for any of
the direct costs of the Energy Review. Daishowa will provide
employees as needed to guide individuals conducting the Energy
Review and other information without reimbursement.
IV. DAISHOWA'S COOPERATION.
Daishowa agrees to provide employees as required to serve
as guides to the individuals performing the Energy review.
Daishowa will also provide one -line drawings detailing its
electrical distribution system plus a list of all connected loads
of 20 horsepower or greater.
V. NO SUBSEQUENT OBLIGATIONS.
Daishowa understands that, by agreeing to allow City
Light to conduct the Energy Review, it is not agreeing to implement
any energy saving measures that may be recommended at the
conclusion of the Energy Review. Daishowa will consider any such
2
recommendations to modify or replace its electrical or mechanical
equipment in light of its available capital and the expected return
on investment for any energy saving measures recommended, as well
as in light of Daishowa's other business priorities. The City will
provide assistance to Daishowa at its request to secure financial
incentives through any programs which are available to support
energy savings measures.
VI. ROLE OF CITY LIGHT AND BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION.
Daishowa understands that City Light has selected a
qualified consultant to perform the Energy Review in the firm of
CRS Sirrine, Inc. This firm will be conducting the Energy Review
under the direction and supervision of Port Angeles City Light. A
report of the Energy Review will be prepared and provided to the
Bonneville Power Administration for review. Daishowa shall also
receive copies of all reports prepared in connection with the
Energy Review.
Daishowa America Co.. LTD.
By
7 ITS 42‹;',1.¢,,,
Ap oved� as to form:
lt#110
City Attorney
3
City_.Qf Port Angeles
By
Title Tttz.7btt-
(As Authorized by City Council
at the April 16, 1991 Council
meeting.)
AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
FOR ENERGY REVIEW AT
DAISHOWA AMERICA PORT ANGELES MILL
.5.x55
THIS AGREEMENT is made this ,..9 nv day of rrJA./ 1991,
by and between the City of Port Angeles, a Municipal Corporation of
the State of Washington (hereinafter "City and CRS Sirrine
Engineers, Inc. (hereinafter "Sirrine
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES, COVENANTS, AGREEMENTS,
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE PARTIES AGREE as follows:
I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND SERVICES
A. Sirrine will perform the engineering services as described
in the Scope of Work of their proposal N -91 -125, dated March 29,
1991, which is incorporated herein as Attachment "D
B. Sirrine understands that funding for this project is
provided by the Bonneville Power Administration under a separate
contract with the City, and further agrees to provide the profes-
sional services specified in Attachment "C which is expressly
incorporated herein by this reference.
II. PAYMENT
For services furnished, the City shall pay Sirrine on a time and
expense basis. Total payment for all services provided under this
Agreement shall not exceed $65,000. The following personnel are
assigned to the project and will be billed at the hourly rates as
listed.
Mike Woodward $85 /hour
Jim Poole $100 /hour
Larry Hebert $75 /hour
Tom Meersman $100 /hour
Additionally, secretarial services shall be billed at the rate of
$30 /hour plus overtime. Compensation to Sirrine will be according to
1
Attachment "A Compensation, and Attachment "B" Current Computer
Reproduction Price Schedule. Sirrine will submit detailed invoices
at the end of each month with payment being due thirty (30) days from
the date of invoice. Interest will be charged at the rate of 1 -1/2
percent per month when payments are overdue.
Sirrine shall maintain records conforming to acceptable
accounting practices and further shall submit billings in a format
satisfactory to the requirements of Attachment "C
III. INDEMNIFICATION
A. Sirrine shall promptly notify the City's Risk Manager and
the City Attorney's office of all damaged property of the City or
others and of any injuries sustained by any persons, including
employees of Sirrine, in any manner relating directly or indirectly
to the work within the scope of this Agreement.
B. Sirrine agrees to and does hereby indemnify and save the
City harmless from and against any and all losses, damage, claims,
actions, liability, attorney's fees, and expense whether in contract
or in tort, in connection with loss of life, bodily injury and /or
property damage occurring on or about or arising out of those
portions of the work under Sirrine's control or wherever arising if
occasioned wholly by negligent act or errors of Sirrine, or by its
agents, servants or employees should the same arise during the
progress of the work.
IV. INSURANCE
A. Sirrine shall secure and maintain in effect at all times,
at its expense, insurance of the following kinds and limits to cover
all locations of Sirrine's operation in connection with the work on
this project:
2
1. Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability
covering employees of Sirrine.
(a) Worker's Compensation with statutory limits of
liability.
(b) Employer's Liability with statutory limits of
liability.
2. Public Liability Insurance covering Sirrine's legal
liability for bodily injuries with limits of not less than Five
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) per person and One Million
Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and for property damage of not
less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) per accident and
Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) aggregate.
3. Automobile Liability Insurance for bodily injuries in
limits of not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) per
person and One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident and for
property damage of not less than Two Hundred Thousand Dollars
($200,000) per accident, providing coverage for any accident arising
out of or resulting from the operation, maintenance or use by Sirrine
of any owned, non -owned or hired automobiles, trailers or other
equipment required to be licensed.
4. Professional Liability Insurance for all facets of
Sirrine's operations and work, including errors, omissions and neg-
ligent acts covering this Agreement with minimum limits of Two Hun-
dred Fifty Thousand Dollar ($250,000) liability per occurrence and
Two Hundred Fifty Thousand ($250,000) aggregate errors and omissions.
V. COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS
The parties shall keep, observe and perform all requirements of
applicable Federal, State and Local laws, rules and regulations or
ordinances.
3
VI. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS,
In all matters relating to this Agreement, Sirrine shall be
acting as an independent contractor. Neither Sirrine nor any
employees of Sirrine are employees of the City under the meaning or
application of any Federal or State unemployment or insurance laws.
Sirrine agrees to assume all liabilities or obligations imposed by
any one or more of such laws with respect to employees of Sirrine, if
any, in the performance of this Agreement. Sirrine shall not have
any authority to assume or create any obligation, express or implied,
on behalf of the City and Sirrine shall have no authority to
represent as agent, employee or in any other capacity than as herein
before set forth.
VII. TERMINATION OF SERVICES
Services may be terminated at any time, at the discretion of the
City, upon payment of the charges that have been accrued and/or
committed to the date of termination.
VIII. TERM OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement will become effective at the date of signing by
both parties and will remain in effect until December 31, 1991.
IX. INTERPRETATION
A. This Agreement and all the terms and provisions shall be
interpreted and construed according to the laws of the State of
Washington. Should any clause, paragraph, or other part of this
Agreement be held or declared to be void or illegal for any reason by
any court having competent jurisdiction, all other clauses,
paragraphs or parts of this Agreement shall, nevertheless, remain in
full force and effect.
B. This Agreement between the parties shall be deemed to
4
include this Agreement and Attachments A, B, C and D and any written
addenda thereto as may be executed by the parties. The City shall
not be bound by any supplement hereto unless it is signed by an
authorized representative of the City. Sirrine shall not be bound by
the supplement hereto unless it is signed by an officer or authorized
representative of Sirrine.
X. DISPUTES
Any disputes concerning Sirrine's performance of the work shall
be resolved pursuant to the applicable provisions of Attachment "C
Venue of any lawsuit related to this Agreement shall be in Clallam
County, Washington.
XI. BINDING EFFECT
This Agreement shall not be binding until executed by all
parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement by their duly authorized representatives on this 29th day
of May
CITY PORT ANGELES
By:
Title: 12'C
As authorized by City Council
at its April 16, 1991 meeting.
I>_ T'T F': S T F
n
(Seal)
AP''ROVED A5 TO FORM
1991.
5
CRS SIRRINE ENGINES S, INC.
By: 7 L
T it e: £P V/GE
ATTEST:
al
krz,
0
LIGHTSIR CON
COMPENSATION
ATTACHMENT "A"
For performance of additional services, we propose that our compensation is the sum of the
following:
A. Payment for salaries per article 2 of this Agreement for services rendered
by all employees working on the assignment.
B. Payment for overtime for exempt employees when said employees work
more than 40 hours per week on the assignment.
C. Payment for overtime premiums for nonprofessional personnel equal to
one -half of their straight -time hourly wage rate.
D. Payment for long distance telephone charges.
E. Payment for the use of computer services in design, scheduling, and other
services on behalf of the assignment. Attachment "B" provides rates for
these services. All rates are subject to semiannual revision.
F. Payment for the use of our computer -aided design equipment on behalf
of the assignment. Billing rates for computer -aided design (AutoCAD)
applications are contained in Attachment "B". These charges include the
cost of equipment and supplies. These rates are subject to semiannual
revision.
G. Payment for all reproductions on behalf of the assignment at our standard
rates as shown in Attachment "B".
H. Payment for telefax, postage, and courier service.
I. Payment for travel and subsistence for our personnel on behalf of the
assignment. (Current rate for the use of personal cars is 27.5 cents per
mile and is subject to semiannual revision.)
J. Payment for the cost (plus 10 of outside consulting and /or professional
services such as metallurgical, archaeological, legal, accounting, and
other specialized services. We will obtain the Client's approval before
authorizing these services.
ATTACHMENT "B"
CURRENT COMPUTER/REPRODUCTION PRICE SCHEDULE
JANUARY 1, 1991
APPLICATION
Personal Computer
(No charge for personal computers
used for word processing)
COST PER UNIT
$15 per hour
AutoCAD $25 per hour
Main Frame (GEMS) $1,000 per run*
PC Triflex $350 per run*
Blueline Prints .11 per sq. ft.
Sepias .45 per sq. ft.
Mylars $1.25 per sq. ft.
Xerographic Prints:
Bond .25 per sq. ft.
Vellum .75 per sq. ft.
Plain Bond Copies:
8 -1/2 x 11 .11 per sheet
8 -1/2 x 14 .16 per sheet
11 x 17 .22 per sheet
Reproduction which CRS Sirrine Engineers Invoice cost to CRS Sirrine
is not equipped to do in -house Engineers plus 10%
NOTE: 1) If the need for other software programs is identified, the charges
will be established based on software cost and required computer time.
2) This rate schedule is subject to semiannual revision.
Estimate average based on past experience. Charges will be based on actual cost.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
PURPOSE. This Intergovernmental Agreement between the Bonneville Power
Administration (BPA) and the City of Port Angeles (City) initiates work on the
project entitled Daishowa Energy Review Technical Services, wherein the City
will seek subcontract assistance to conduct an energy review at Daishowa of
America, Inc.. The City is the electrical service provider to this company.
Effective period: January 10, 1991 to December 31, 1991.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. The City shall submit reports /deliverables as
specified in the Statement of Work. No other reports are required.
PAYMENT. The City will submit monthly invoices for reimbursement for work
performed, noting the Intergovernmental Agreement number to:
Bonneville Power Administration
ATTN: Shannon Greene TBA
201 Queen Anne Ave. North, Suite 400
Seattle, WA
ATTACHMENT "C"
DE- BI79- 91BP16502
Page 1
The City will supply an itemized listing of expenditures for each budgetary
line item set forth in the approved budget, showing as a minimum:
1. Salaries (including personnel and benefits)
2. Travel and transportation (including per diem)
3. Nonexpendable equipment and material (greater than $1000 per item)
4. Expendable equipment and material (sensitive in nature)
5. Operations and maintenance (including computer services and
publications)
6. Overhead
7. Cumulative expenditures to date
Non itemized and /or incomplete billings will be detained for payment
processing until correct information has been supplied by the City. Allowable
costs shall be determined in accordance with the cost principles as
implemented by Bonneville Acquisition Guide Part 31.6.
REOUIREMENT FOR AUDIT (07 -90) (BAG 15.106 -70)
The contractor is required to have an audit made in accordance with the
requirements of Office of Management and Budget Circular A -133. In addition
to the requirement for distribution of copies in accordance with the circular,
a copy shall be provided to BPA upon request of the Contracting Officer.
DE- BI79- 918P16502
Page 2
AUDIT INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS (10 -89) (BAG 17.504 -70)
The City shall maintain accounting procedures and practices sufficient to
reflect properly all costs claimed to have been incurred in performing this
agreement. The Contracting Officer, or representatives of the Contracting
Officer, shall have the right to examine books, records, documents and other
evidence supporting such claimed costs as they judge necessary. This right of
examination shall include inspection at all reasonable times at the agency's
facilities used in performing this agreement, and locations where records
pertaining to this agreement are maintained.
LIMITATION OF COST.
1. The parties estimate that performance of this agreement will not cost the
SPA more than the estimated cost specified in the budget. The City agrees
to use its best efforts to perform the work specified in the Statement of
Work and all obligations under this agreement within the estimated cost.
2. The City shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing whenever it has
reason to believe that:
a. The costs the City expects to incur under this agreement in the next
60 days, when added to all costs previously incurred, will exceed
75 percent of the estimated cost specified in the agreement; or
b. The total cost for the performance of this agreement will be either
greater or substantially less than had been previously estimated.
3. As part of the notification, the City shall provide the Contracting
Officer a revised estimate of the total cost of performing this agreement.
4. Except as required by other provisions of this agreement specifically
citing and stated to be an exception to this clause:
a. The SPA is not obligated to reimburse the City for costs incurred in
excess of the estimated cost specified in the agreement.
b. The City is not obligated to continue performance under this
agreement or otherwise incur costs in excess of the estimated cost
specified in the budget, until the Contracting Officer (1) notifies
the City in writing that the estimated cost has been increased; and
(2) provides a revised estimated total cost of performing this
agreement.
5. No notice, communication, or representation in any form other than that
specified in subparagraph (4)(b) above, or from any person other than the
Contracting Officer, shall affect this agreement's estimated cost to the
BPA. In the absence of the specified notice, the BPA is not obligated to
reimburse the Ciyt for any costs in excess of the estimated cost.
DE- BI79- 91BP16502
Page 3
6. If the estimated cost specified in the budget is increased, any costs the
City incurs before the increase that are in excess of the previously
estimated cost shall be allowable to the same extent as if incurred
afterward, unless the Contracting Officer issues a termination or other
notice directing that the increase is solely to cover termination or other
specified expenses.
7. Modifications shall not be considered an authorization to exceed the
estimated cost to the BPA, unless they contain a statement increasing the
estimated cost.
8. If this agreement is terminated or the estimated cost is not increased,
the BPA and the City shall negotiate an equitable distribution of all
property produced or purchased under the agreement, based upon the share
of costs incurred by each.
CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING FOR CONTRACTS (01 -90) (BAG 3.7007 -1)
In accordance with Public Law 101 -121, Section 319, the under signed
certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or
on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting
to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress,
an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress
in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any
Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any
cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal,
amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or
will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an
an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection
with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement, the
undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form LLL, Disclosure Form
to Report Lobbying, in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification
be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers
(including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and
cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and
disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which
reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into.
Submission of this certification is prerequisite for making or entering
into this transaction imposed by section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any
person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a
civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each
such failure.
DE- BI79- 91BP16502
Page 4
Terms used in this provision and further information on the activities
permitted or prohibited under this law, and penalties for violations, is
published in BAGII 90 -4 which is available from the Contracting Officer
issuing this solicitation. The reporting form, SF -LLL, "Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities" is also available from the Contracting Officer.
DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE (03 -89) (BAG 23.505)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause "Controlled substance" means a
controlled substance in schedules I through V of section 202 of the Controlled
Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and as further defined in regulation at 21 CFR
1308.11 1308.15.
"Conviction" means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or
imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the
responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug
statutes.
"Criminal drug statute" means a Federal or non Federal criminal statute
involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of any
controlled substance.
"Drug -free workplace" means a site for the performance of work done in
connection with a specific contract at which employees of the Contractor are
prohibited from engaging in the unlawful manufacture, distribution,
dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance.
"Employee" means an employee of a Contractor directly engaged in the
performance of work under a Government contract.
"Individual" means an Offeror /Contractor that has no more than one employee
including the Offeror /Contractor.
(b) The Contractor, if other than an individual, shall-
(1) Publish a statement notifying its employees that the unlawful
manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled
substance is prohibited in the Contractor's workplace and specifying the
actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such
prohibition;
about
(2) Establish a drug -free awareness program to inform such employees
(i) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
(ii) The Contractor's policy of maintaining a drug -free workplace;
DE- BI79- 91BP16502
Page 5
(iii) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee
assistance programs; and
(iv) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse
violations occurring in the workplace.
(3) Provide all employees engaged in performance of the contract with
a copy of the statement required by subparagraph (b)(1) of this clause;
(4) Notify such employees in the statement required by subparagraph
(b)(1) of this clause, that as a condition of continued employment on this
contract, the employee will
(i) Abide by the terms of the statement; and
(ii) Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for
a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such
conviction.
(5) Notify the Contracting Officer within ten (10) days after
receiving notice under subdivision (b)(4)(ii) of this clause, from an employee
or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction;
(6) Within 30 days after receiving notice under subparagraph (a)(4) of
this clause of a conviction, impose the following sanctions or remedial
measures on any employee who is convicted of drug abuse violations occurring
in the workplace:
(i) Taking appropriate personnel action against such employee, up to
and including termination; or
(ii) Require such employee to satisfactorily participate in a drug
abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a
Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency.
(7) Make a good faith effort to maintain a drug -free workplace through
implementation of subparagraphs (b)(1) through (b)(6) of this clause.
(c) The Contractor, if an individual, agrees by award of the contract or
acceptance of a purchase order, not to engage in the unlawful manufacture,
distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance in
performance of this contract.
(d) In addition to other remedies available to the Government, the
Contractor's failure to comply with the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c)
of this clause may, pursuant to BAG 23.506, render the Contractor subject to
suspension of contract payments, termination of the contract for default, and
suspension or debarment.
CONTRACTING OFFICER'S TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE (COTR).
(VS2- SRPF- 5129w)
DE- BI79- 91BP16502
Page 6
CHANGES. Any changes in the project objectives, scope, or key personnel,
including any proposed transfer of expenditures between approved budget line
items must be approved by the Contracting Officer. All such changes must be
submitted in writing through the Contracting Officer's Technical
Representative (COTR prior to initiating the change
SUBCONTRACTORS. BPA understands that the majority of the work will be
performed by a subcontractor, with project oversight and responsibility for
deliverables retained by the City. The City agrees to use its established
contracting methods to acquire the services of a responsible subcontractor at
a reasonable cost. Within 14 days of selecting a subcontractor, the City will
notify the Contracting Officer, providing the name and address of the
subcontractor.
TERMINATION. This Intergovernmental Agreement may be terminated by BPA upon
30 -days' written notice. In the event of a termination, BPA shall reimburse
the City for costs actually incurred to the effective date of the termination,
and for any commitments extending beyond the termination date, but not
exceeding the expiration date of the Intergovernmental Agreement, that the
City is unable to cancel.
CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE (COR). The Contracting Officer's
Representative (COR) shall have all the rights, powers, and privileges of the
Contracting Officer necessary to the administration of the agreement:
provided, however, that the COR is not empowered to execute agreement
modifications, or to suspend or terminate the agreement.
1. The Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) is the
authorized representative of the Contracting Officer for technical actions
performed in relation to the agreement. This includes the functions of:
(1) inspection and review of work performed; (2) inspection and witness of
tests, presentations, or other activities; (3) interpretation of technical
specifications; (4) approval of Contractor's reports, other materials and
invoices; and (5) rejection of nonconforming services, material, or
equipment.
2. The COTR is not authorized to act for the Contracting Officer in the
following matters pertaining to the agreement: (1) agreement
modifications that change the agreement cost, technical specifications, or
time for performance; and (2) suspension or termination.
PUBLICATION. BPA strongly endorses the publication of project results in
scientific journals to facilitate public access and to preserve project data.
When appropriate, Project Managers shall prepare manuscripts for submission to
journal editors, giving due credit for EPA's financial support. BPA reserves
the right to publish all or part of the reports submitted pursuant to the
terms of this Intergovernmental Agreement.
PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS. All news releases, presentations, or publications shall
acknowledge BPA support for project activities. Copies of news articles shall
be forwarded to the BPA Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR).
Part A General
Statement of Work
for
Daishowa Energy Review Technical Services
A.1 Goal of this Contract.
DE- B179- 91BP16502
The objective of this contract is to provide reimbursement to Port
Angeles City Light (Contractor) for providing technical services in the
form of an Energy Review to its industrial customer, Daishowa America Co.
Ltd., (Daishowa). The objective of the Energy Review is to identify cost
effective Measures that will help improve the electrical energy
efficiency of the facility and which are cost effective to the facility
and /or Bonneville.
A.2 Background.
Daishowa is a major industrial customer of Port Angeles City Light. The
utility requested that the Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville)
help fund an Energy Review for this facility so that its customer would
be provided with information about Measures that could improve the
electrical energy efficiency of the facility. The Redesigned Energy
Savings Plan (ESP) Program will be incorporating Energy Reviews into the
program in the fall of 1990, therefore, this agreement is compatible with
the new direction of Bonneville's industrial programs.
Bonneville is currently funding Energy Review services under agreements
of this type with other Bonneville utility customers. This Energy Review
should provide enough information to Daishowa so that they can pursue the
installation of the identified electrical energy conservation Measures on
their own or through the ESP program. The scope of the Energy Review
will be limited by the dollar amount, so emphasis will be placed on
identifying cost effective Measures that do not require extensive
analysis.
A.3 Location of Project.
This contract will be valid for services rendered in the Contractor's
service territory.
A.4 Government Furnished Property and Services.
None.
A.5 Contractor Furnished Property or Services.
The Contractor is required to provide all property and services.
A.6 Definitions.
a. Contractor is Port Angeles City Light.
b. Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) is the
individual designated and authorized by the Contracting Officer (CO)
to perform technical contract administrative activities on behalf of
the CO within the limits specified by the CO. The COTR for this
agreement is Shannon Greene.
c. Energy Review is an analysis of an industrial facility to identify
electrical energy savings opportunities.
d. Energy Savings Plan (ESP)is a pilot program which offers incentives
to industries in the Region for developing energy saving methods in
their manufacturing processes.
e. Measure is an opportunity that will improve the electrical energy
efficiency of the facility and that is cost effective to the facility
and /or Bonneville (up to 50 mills).
A.7 Documentation.
None
Part B Technical Approach /Tasks
B.1 General Requirements.
a. Conduct an on -site Energy Review of the Daishowa facility to identify
cost effective, electrical energy- saving opportunities (Measures).
The Energy Review will focus on easily identifiable Measures that do
not require extensive analysis.
b. The Energy Review should also identify other opportunities that can
reduce electrical load but that cannot be analyzed within the scope
of this Energy Review. These items can include Measures that require
more in -depth analysis, alternate sources of power supply (i.e.,
cogeneration), and fuel switching.
B.2 Methods to be Used.
The Contractor may use any method deemed necessary to meet the
requirements listed in Section B.3. The Contractor may subcontract any
or all of the work to be performed with the understanding that the
Contractor is responsible for the satisfactory completion of all work
performed.
B.3 Specific_ Requirements.
a. Perform an on -site Energy Review of the Daishowa facility with the
intent of identifying electrical energy conservation Measures.
Specify the review methodogy(ies) used (i.e., end -use, comparable
facilities comparison, state of the art, etc.)
b. Perform technical and financial analyses of the identified Measures
to determine:
1. the estimated electrical energy savings;
2. the value of the savings;
3. implementation costs and cost effectiveness (up to 45 mills) of
the Measures;
4. interaction of identified Measures with industrial process(es);
5. a preliminary analysis of non electric measures may be done if
there are interactive effects with the electric Measures or the
integrity of the process is jeopardized, however, the focus of the
analysis is to be on identifying electrical energy savings
opportunities.
c. The Measures identified need not be limited to the industrial
process(es) and may include lighting and building shell improvements.
d. Preliminary analysis of other Measures that require more in -depth
analysis as identified in Section B.1 above.
e. Allow a Bonneville representative to accompany those performing the
Energy Review if Bonneville determines this to be appropriate.
f. The Energy Review is subject to the Freedom of Information Act. If
the Contractor has included data and information that they do not
want disclosed to the public or used by the Government except for
evaluation purposes shall mark the title page with the following
legend:
This Energy Review includes data that shall not be disclosed
outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or
disclosed in whole or in part for any purpose other than to
evaluate this Energy Review. This restriction does not limit the
Government's right to use information contained in this Energy
Review if it is obtained from another source without restriction.
The data subject to this restriction are contained in pages
Mark each page of restricted data with the following legend:
Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the
restriction on the title page of this Project Summary /Proposal.
Information restricted in accordance with the above shall be exempt
from disclosure in accordance with exemption provisions of the
Freedom of Information Act.
B.4 Deliverables.
Two copies of an Energy Review report shall be submitted to Bonneville.
This report will consist of, at a minimum:
a. A general description of the facility: load size, characteristics of
the physical structure, and the plant layout.
b. A general description of the industrial process(es), end uses, and
the related electrical equipment.
c. Identification and analysis of Measures and a discussion of the
impact and interactive effects of installed Measures on the
process(es) and other facility equipment.
d. Analysis of interactive effects of recommended Measures on each other
(i.e., may need to adjust baseline to determine savings estimate).
e. A general summary of the Measures in chart or table form that lists:
1. Measure
2. electrical energy savings in kWhs
3. dollar value of savings based on utility rate only
4. dollar value of savings based on utility rate and all associated
benefits (operation, maintenance, and replacement benefits, labor
savings, salvage values of removed equipment, increase in
production, demand reduction, etc.); identify which benefits were
included
5. estimated implementation costs (equipment costs, associated
installation costs, removal costs, permit and inspection costs,
engineering design costs, etc.)
6. cost effectiveness (payback to be determined based on full value
of savings: the figure in B.4.e.4.)
This chart shall rank each Measure, with the most cost effective
Measure listed first. Separate charts or tables may be needed to
account for interactive effects between Measures.
f. List of references, directories, equipment specifications, and
publications used in Review process.
Raw data, working notes, and specific information about processes and the
facility unrelated to identified Measures need not be relatd in the
Energy Review report but should be kept on file to be accessed and
reviewed by Bonneville if necessary.
B.5 Time Schedule.
The Contractor has through the effective date of this agreement to
perform the specific requirements and to deliver the Energy Review report.
The Contractor shall submit a milestone chart which specifies at a
minimum:
Part C Review of Deliverables.
Review of the Energy Review report by Bonneville will be such to
determine that adequate work was performed to ensure that a significant
effort existed in determining cost effective Measures for the amount
charged.
2174h
11 -27 -90
1. Solicitation for Request for Qualifications
2. Closing for Request for Qualifications
3. Selection and announcement of consultant(s)
4. Introductory meeting with the Contractor, the consultant, and
Daishowa
5. Date(s) of Energy Review onsite at the facility
6. Draft of Energy Review report
7. Final report and findings
BPAP'4220 3;
(10 -89)
(Previously BPA 1393 1270 01)
1 AGREEMENT NO 2 AGREEMENT TYPE
L_ I Interagency
I_J Intraagency
S
S
U
E
DE- BI79- 91BP16502
6 ORGANIZATION AND ADDRESS
City of Port Angeles
P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
AGREEMENT
3 MODIFICATION NO 4 EFFECTIVE DATE 5 PROCUREMENT REQUEST NO
7 TECHNICAL CONTACT I PHONE NO
r Scott McLain (206) 457 -0411
0 8 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTACT I PHONE NO
Same
12 THIS AGREEMENT WAS NEGOTIATED PURSUANTTO
Li 31 U S C 1535 (Federal) L XJ 16 U S C 832g (Other)
LJ 16 U S C 832a(f) (Customer) LJ
14 TITLE AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO AND BECOME A PART OF THIS AGREEMENT
DAISHOWA ENERGY REVIEW TECHNICAL SERVICES
This is a cost reimbursement type agreement.
This agreement consists of:
Award page
Terms and Conditions
Statement of Work
A complete budget will be incorporated into this agreement within 90 days of the
Contracting Officer's signature.
If this is an Intergovernmental or Customer Agreement, the provisions on the reverse of this form are a part of the Agreement
15 AMOUNT TO BE PAID BY BPA
100,000 NTE
17 SUBMIT INVOICE TO
p 20 APPROVED BY (Signature)
(VS2- SRPF- 5177w) nkb
See Terms and Conditions
for billing instructions
r.o. pox 3621
I DATE
NAM EE TITLE (Type or pr
A Bob Titus
N Director, Port Angeles City Light
LJ Intergovernmental
LI Customer
220191
S
s
U
E
d
9 ORGANIZATION AND ADDRESS
U.S. Department of Energy
Bonneville Power Administration SRPF
P.O. Box 3621
Portland, Oregon 97208
10 BPA TECHNICAL CONTACT
s Shannon Greene
Y 11 BPA ADMINISTRATIVE CONTACT I PHONE NO
Nancy Belzons SRPF (503) 230 5064
13 AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE FROM DATE IN BLOCK 4 UNTIL
December 31, 1991
16 AMOUNT TO BE PAID TO BPA
N/A
18 ACCOUNTING INFORMATION (BPA use only)
19 SUBMIT INVOICE TO
NAME
ADDRESS
s
P
RMI 25 GNL T23302
N/A
21 APF OVED BY (Signs re)
.0
NAME 8 TITLE (Type or pint)
A Delbert S. Olenslager
Contracting Officer
01/10/91 79- 91BP16502
PHONE NO
TBA (206) 442 -0675
100%
5. X55
I DATE
4 4 7/7/
BPA F 4220 31 (Reverse Side)
GENERAL PROVISIONS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS
1. OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT (BAG 52.203 -1)
No member of or delegate to Congress, or resident
commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part
of this agreement, or to any benefit arising from it.
However, this provision does not apply to this agree-
ment to the extent that this agreement is made with a
corporation for the corporation's general benefit.
2. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
(BAG 52.203 -5)
The Contractor warrants that no person or agency has
been employed or retained to solicit or obtain this
agreement upon an agreement or understanding for a
contingent fee, except a bona fide employee or
agency. For breach or violation of this warranty, the
Government shall have the right to annul this agree-
ment without liability, or at its discretion, to deduct
from the price or consideration, or otherwise recover,
the full amount of the contingent fee.
3. CONVICT LABOR (BAG 52.222 -3)
The Contractor agrees not to employ any person
undergoing sentence of imprisonment ini connection
with performance of work under this agreement,
except as provided by 18 U.S.C. 4082(c)(2) and
Executive Order 11755, December 29, 1973.
4. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
The Contractor shall not discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of
race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
The Contractor shall take affirmative action to ensure
that applicants are employed, and that employees are
treated during employment, without regard to their
race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action
shall include, but not be limited to (i) employment,
(ii) upgrading, (iii) demotion, (iv) transfer, (v) recruit-
ment or recruitment advertising, (vi) layoff or termina-
tion, (vii) rates of pay or other forms of compensation,
and (yin) selection for training, including apprenticeship.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
DE- BI79- 91BP16502
Page 1
PURPOSE. This Intergovernmental Agreement between the Bonneville Power
Administration (BPA) and the City of Port Angeles (City) initiates work on the
project entitled Daishowa Energy Review Technical Services, wherein the City
will seek subcontract assistance to conduct an energy review at Daishowa of
America, Inc.. The City is the electrical service provider to this company.
Effective period: January 10, 1991 to December 31, 1991.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. The City shall submit reports /deliverables as
specified in the Statement of Work. No other reports are required.
PAYMENT. The City will submit monthly invoices for reimbursement for work
performed, noting the Intergovernmental Agreement number to:
Bonneville Power Administration
ATTN: Shannon Greene TBA
201 Queen Anne Ave. North, Suite 400
Seattle, WA
The City will supply an itemized listing of expenditures for each budgetary
line item set forth in the approved budget, showing as a minimum:
1. Salaries (including personnel and benefits)
2. Travel and transportation (including per diem)
3. Nonexpendable equipment and material (greater than $1000 per item)
4. Expendable equipment and material (sensitive in nature)
5. Operations and maintenance (including computer services and
publications)
6. Overhead
7. Cumulative expenditures to date
Non itemized and /or incomplete billings will be detained for payment
processing until correct information has been supplied by the City. Allowable
costs shall be determined in accordance with the cost principles as
implemented by Bonneville Acquisition Guide Part 31.6.
REQUIREMENT FOR AUDIT (07 -90) (BAG 15.106 -70)
The contractor is required to have an audit made in accordance with the
requirements of Office of Management and Budget Circular A -133. In addition
to the requirement for distribution of copies in accordance with the circular,
a copy shall be provided to BPA upon request of the Contracting Officer.
LIMITATION OF COST.
DE- BI79- 91BP16502
Page 2
AUDIT INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS (10 -89) (BAG 17.504 -70)
The City shall maintain accounting procedures and practices sufficient to
reflect properly all costs claimed to have been incurred in performing this
agreement. The Contracting Officer, or representatives of the Contracting
Officer, shall have the right to examine books, records, documents and other
evidence supporting such claimed costs as they judge necessary. This right of
examination shall include inspection at all reasonable times at the agency's
facilities used in performing this agreement, and locations where records
pertaining to this agreement are maintained.
1. The parties estimate that performance of this agreement will not cost the
BPA more than the estimated cost specified in the budget. The City agrees
to use its best efforts to perform the work specified in the Statement of
Work and all obligations under this agreement within the estimated cost.
2. The City shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing whenever it has
reason to believe that:
a. The costs the City expects to incur under this agreement in the next
60 days, when added to all costs previously incurred, will exceed
75 percent of the estimated cost specified in the agreement; or
b. The total cost for the performance of this agreement will be either
greater or substantially less than had been previously estimated.
3. As part of the notification, the City shall provide the Contracting
Officer a revised estimate of the total cost of performing this agreement.
4. Except as required by other provisions of this agreement specifically
citing and stated to be an exception to this clause:
a. The BPA is not obligated to reimburse the City for costs incurred in
excess of the estimated cost specified in the agreement.
b. The City is not obligated to continue performance under this
agreement or otherwise incur costs in excess of the estimated cost
specified in the budget, until the Contracting Officer (1) notifies
the City in writing that the estimated cost has been increased; and
(2) provides a revised estimated total cost of performing this
agreement.
5. No notice, communication, or representation in any form other than that
specified in subparagraph (4)(b) above, or from any person other than the
Contracting Officer, shall affect this agreement's estimated cost to the
BPA. In the absence of the specified notice, the BPA is not obligated to
reimburse the Ciyt for any costs in excess of the estimated cost.
DE- BI79- 91BP16502
Page 3
6. If the estimated cost specified in the budget is increased, any costs the
City incurs before the increase that are in excess of the previously
estimated cost shall be allowable to the same extent as if incurred
afterward, unless the Contracting Officer issues a termination or other
notice directing that the increase is solely to cover termination or other
specified expenses.
7. Modifications shall not be considered an authorization to exceed the
estimated cost to the BPA, unless they contain a statement increasing the
estimated cost.
8. If this agreement is terminated or the estimated cost is not increased,
the BPA and the City shall negotiate an equitable distribution of all
property produced or purchased under the agreement, based upon the share
of costs incurred by each.
CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING FOR CONTRACTS (01 -90) (BAG 3.7007 -1)
In accordance with Public Law 101 -121, Section 319, the under signed
certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or
on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting
to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress,
an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress
in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any
Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any
cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal,
amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or
will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an
an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection
with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement, the
undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form LLL, Disclosure Form
to Report Lobbying, in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification
be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers
(including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and
cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and
disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which
reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into.
Submission of this certification is prerequisite for making or entering
into this transaction imposed by section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any
person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a
civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each
such failure.
DE- BI79- 91BP16502
Page 4
Terms used in this provision and further information on the activities
permitted or prohibited under this law, and penalties for violations, is
published in BAGII 90 -4 which is available from the Contracting Officer
issuing this solicitation. The reporting form, SF -LLL, "Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities" is also available from the Contracting Officer.
DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE (03 -89) (BAG 23.505)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause "Controlled substance" means a
controlled substance in schedules I through V of section 202 of the Controlled
Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and as further defined in regulation at 21 CFR
1308.11- 1308.15.
"Conviction" means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or
imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the
responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug
statutes.
"Criminal drug statute" means a Federal or non Federal criminal statute
involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of any
controlled substance.
"Drug -free workplace" means a site for the performance of work done in
connection with a specific contract at which employees of the Contractor are
prohibited from engaging in the unlawful manufacture, distribution,
dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance.
"Employee" means an employee of a Contractor directly engaged in the
performance of work under a Government contract.
"Individual" means an Offeror /Contractor that has no more than one employee
including the Offeror /Contractor.
(b) The Contractor, if other than an individual, shall-
(1) Publish a statement notifying its employees that the unlawful
manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled
substance is prohibited in the Contractor's workplace and specifying the
actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such
prohibition;
about
(2) Establish a drug -free awareness program to inform such employees
(i) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
(ii) The Contractor's policy of maintaining a drug -free workplace;
(i) Abide by the terms of the statement; and
DE- BI79- 91BP16502
Page 5
(iii) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee
assistance programs; and
(iv) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse
violations occurring in the workplace.
(3) Provide all employees engaged in performance of the contract with
a copy of the statement required by subparagraph (b)(1) of this clause;
(4) Notify such employees in the statement required by subparagraph
(b)(1) of this clause, that as a condition of continued employment on this
contract, the employee will
(ii) Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for
a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such
conviction.
(5) Notify the Contracting Officer within ten (10) days after
receiving notice under subdivision (b)(4)(ii) of this clause, from an employee
or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction;
(6) Within 30 days after receiving notice under subparagraph (a)(4) of
this clause of a conviction, impose the following sanctions or remedial
measures on any employee who is convicted of drug abuse violations occurring
in the workplace:
(i) Taking appropriate personnel action against such employee, up to
and including termination; or
(ii) Require such employee to satisfactorily participate in a drug
abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a
Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency.
(7) Make a good faith effort to maintain a drug -free workplace through
implementation of subparagraphs (b)(1) through (b)(6) of this clause.
(c) The Contractor, if an individual, agrees by award of the contract or
acceptance of a purchase order, not to engage in the unlawful manufacture,
distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance in
performance of this contract.
(d) In addition to other remedies available to the Government, the
Contractor's failure to comply with the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c)
of this clause may, pursuant to BAG 23.506, render the Contractor subject to
suspension of contract payments, termination of the contract for default, and
suspension or debarment.
DE- BI79- 91BP16502
Page 6
CHANGES. Any changes in the project objectives, scope, or key personnel,
including any proposed transfer of expenditures between approved budget line
items must be approved by the Contracting Officer. All such changes must be
submitted in writing through the Contracting Officer's Technical
Representative (COTR prior to initiating the change
SUBCONTRACTORS. BPA understands that the majority of the work will be
performed by a subcontractor, with project oversight and responsibility for
deliverables retained by the City. The City agrees to use its established
contracting methods to acquire the services of a responsible subcontractor at
a reasonable cost. Within 14 days of selecting a subcontractor, the City will
notify the Contracting Officer, providing the name and address of the
subcontractor.
TERMINATION. This Intergovernmental Agreement may be terminated by BPA upon
30 -days' written notice. In the event of a termination, BPA shall reimburse
the City for costs actually incurred to the effective date of the termination,
and for any commitments extending beyond the termination date, but not
exceeding the expiration date of the Intergovernmental Agreement, that the
City is unable to cancel.
CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE (COR). The Contracting Officer's
Representative (COR) shall have all the rights, powers, and privileges of the
Contracting Officer necessary to the administration of the agreement:
provided, however, that the COR is not empowered to execute agreement
modifications, or to suspend or terminate the agreement.
CONTRACTING OFFICER'S TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE (COTR).
1. The Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) is the
authorized representative of the Contracting Officer for technical actions
performed in relation to the agreement. This includes the functions of:
(1) inspection and review of work performed; (2) inspection and witness of
tests, presentations, or other activities; (3) interpretation of technical
specifications; (4) approval of Contractor's reports, other materials and
invoices; and (5) rejection of nonconforming services, material, or
equipment.
2. The COTR is not authorized to act for the Contracting Officer in the
following matters pertaining to the agreement: (1) agreement
modifications that change the agreement cost, technical specifications, or
time for performance; and (2) suspension or termination.
PUBLICATION. BPA strongly endorses the publication of project results in
scientific journals to facilitate public access and to preserve project data.
When appropriate, Project Managers shall prepare manuscripts for submission to
journal editors, giving due credit for BPA's financial support. BPA reserves
the right to publish all or part of the reports submitted pursuant to the
terms of this Intergovernmental Agreement.
PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS. All news releases, presentations, or publications shall
acknowledge BPA support for project activities. Copies of news articles shall
be forwarded to the BPA Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR).
(VS2- SRPF- 5129w)
Part A General
The objective of this contract is to provide reimbursement to Port
Angeles City Light (Contractor) for providing technical services in the
form of an Energy Review to its industrial customer, Daishowa America Co.
Ltd., (Daishowa). The objective of the Energy Review is to identify cost
effective Measures that will help improve the electrical energy
efficiency of the facility and which are cost effective to the facility
and /or Bonneville.
A.2 Background.
Statement of Work
A.1 Goal of this Contract.
for
Daishowa Energy Review Technical Services
DE- BI79- 91BP16502
Daishowa is a major industrial customer of Port Angeles City Light. The
utility requested that the Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville)
help fund an Energy Review for this facility so that its customer would
be provided with information about Measures that could improve the
electrical energy efficiency of the facility. The Redesigned Energy
Savings Plan (ESP) Program will be incorporating Energy Reviews into the
program in the fall of 1990, therefore, this agreement is compatible with
the new direction of Bonneville's industrial programs.
Bonneville is currently funding Energy Review services under agreements
of this type with other Bonneville utility customers. This Energy Review
should provide enough information to Daishowa so that they can pursue the
installation of the identified electrical energy conservation Measures on
their own or through the ESP program. The scope of the Energy Review
will be limited by the dollar amount, so emphasis will be placed on
identifying cost effective Measures that do not require extensive
analysis.
A.3 Location of Project.
This contract will be valid for services rendered in the Contractor's
service territory.
A.4 Government Furnished Property and Services.
None.
A.5 Contractor Furnished Property or Services.
The Contractor is required to provide all property and services.
A.6 Definitions.
a. Contra
b. Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) is the
individual designated and authorized by the Contracting Officer (CO)
to perform technical contract administrative activities on behalf of
the CO, within the limits specified by the CO. The COTR for this
agreement is Shannon Greene.
c. Energy Review is an analysis of an industrial facility to identify
electrical energy savings opportunities.
d. Energy Savings Plan (ESP)is a pilot program which offers incentives
to industries in the Region for developing energy saving methods in
their manufacturing processes.
e. Measure is an opportunity that will improve the electrical energy
efficiency of the facility and that is cost effective to the facility
and /or Bonneville (up to 50 mills).
A.7 Documentation.
None
ctor is Port Angeles City Light.
Part B Technical Approach /Tasks
B.1 General Requirements.
a. Conduct an on -site Energy Review of the Daishowa facility to identify
cost effective, electrical energy- saving opportunities (Measures).
The Energy Review will focus on easily identifiable Measures that do
not require extensive analysis.
b. The Energy Review should also identify other opportunities that can
reduce electrical load but that cannot be analyzed within the scope
of this Energy Review. These items can include Measures that require
more in -depth analysis, alternate sources of power supply (i.e.,
cogeneration), and fuel switching.
B.2 Methods to be Used.
The Contractor may use any method deemed necessary to meet the
requirements listed in Section B.3. The Contractor may subcontract any
or all of the work to be performed with the understanding that the
Contractor is responsible for the satisfactory completion of all work
performed.
B.3 Specific Requirements.
a. Perform an on -site Energy Review of the Daishowa facility with the
intent of identifying electrical energy conservation Measures.
Specify the review methodogy(ies) used (i.e., end -use, comparable
facilities comparison, state of the art, etc.)
b. Perform technical and financial analyses of the identified Measures
to determine:
1. the estimated electrical energy savings;
2. the value of the savings;
3. implementation costs and cost effectiveness (up to 45 mills) of
the Measures;
4. interaction of identified Measures with industrial process(es);
5. a preliminary analysis of non electric measures may be done if
there are interactive effects with the electric Measures or the
integrity of the process is jeopardized, however, the focus of the
analysis is to be on identifying electrical energy savings
opportunities.
c. The Measures identified need not be limited to the industrial
process(es) and may include lighting and building shell improvements.
d. Preliminary analysis of other Measures that require more in -depth
analysis as identified in Section B.1 above.
e. Allow a Bonneville representative to accompany those performing the
Energy Review if Bonneville determines this to be appropriate.
f. The Energy Review is subject to the Freedom of Information Act. If
the Contractor has included data and information that they do not
want disclosed to the public or used by the Government except for
evaluation purposes shall mark the title page with the following
legend:
This Energy Review includes data that shall not be disclosed
outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or
disclosed in whole or in part for any purpose other than to
evaluate this Energy Review. This restriction does not limit the
Government's right to use information contained in this Energy
Review if it is obtained from another source without restriction.
The data subject to this restriction are contained in pages
Mark each page of restricted data with the following legend:
Use or disclosure of data contained on this page is subject to the
restriction on the title page of this Project Summary /Proposal.
Information restricted in accordance with the above shall be exempt
from disclosure in accordance with exemption provisions of the
Freedom of Information Act.
B.4 Deliverables.
Two copies of an Energy Review report shall be submitted to Bonneville.
This report will consist of, at a minimum:
a. A general description of the facility: load size, characteristics of
the physical structure, and the plant layout.
b. A general description of the industrial process(es), end uses, and
the related electrical equipment.
c. Identification and analysis of Measures and a discussion of the
impact and interactive effects of installed Measures on the
process(es) and other facility equipment.
d. Analysis of interactive effects of recommended Measures on each other
(i.e., may need to adjust baseline to determine savings estimate).
e. A general summary of the Measures in chart or table form that lists:
1. Measure
2. electrical energy savings in kWhs
3. dollar value of savings based on utility rate only
4. dollar value of savings based on utility rate and all associated
benefits (operation, maintenance, and replacement benefits, labor
savings, salvage values of removed equipment, increase in
production, demand reduction, etc.); identify which benefits were
included
5. estimated implementation costs (equipment costs, associated
installation costs, removal costs, permit and inspection costs,
engineering design costs, etc.)
6. cost effectiveness (payback to be determined based on full value
of savings: the figure in B.4.e.4.)
This chart shall rank each Measure, with the most cost effective
Measure listed first. Separate charts or tables may be needed to
account for interactive effects between Measures.
f. List of references, directories, equipment specifications, and
publications used in Review process.
Raw data, working notes, and specific information about processes and the
facility unrelated to identified Measures need not be relatd in the
Energy Review but should be kept on file to be accessed and
reviewed by Bonneville if necessary.
B.5 Time Schedule.
The Contractor has through the effective date of this agreement to
perform the specific requirements and to deliver the Energy Review report.
The Contractor shall submit a milestone chart which specifies at a
minimum:
1. Solicitation for Request for Qualifications
2. Closing for Request for Qualifications
3. Selection and announcement of consultant(s)
4. Introductory meeting with the Contractor, the consultant, and
Daishowa
5. Date(s) of Energy Review onsite at the facility
6. Draft of Energy Review report
7. Final report and findings
Part C Review of Deliverables.
Review of the Energy Review report by Bonneville will be such to
determine that adequate work was performed to ensure that a significant
effort existed in determining cost effective Measures for the amount
charged.
2174h
11 -27 -90
V
CRS SIRRINE
ATTACHMENT "D"
5, .25.
CITY OF PORT ANGELES,
WASHINGTON
PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
for
ELECTRICAL EFFICIENCY REVIEW
at
DAISHOWA AMERICA, LTD.
PORT ANGELES PULP PAPER FACILITY
CRS Sirrine Engineers Proposal N -91 -125
March 29, 1991
March 29, 1991
Mr. Scott McLain, Power Analyst
City of Port Angeles, Light Department
321 E. 5th St., P.O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
Subject:
Reference:
Dear Scott:
Technical Services to Conduct an Electrical Efficiency Review at
Daishowa America Ltd., Port Angeles Pulp and Paper Facility.
CRS Sirrine Engineers Proposal No. N -91 -125
City of Port Angeles Light Department Request for Proposal
received by CRS Sirrine Engineers, Inc., March 18, 1991.
We are pleased to propose our engineering services for your electrical efficiency review
of the Daishowa America Ltd., Port Angeles pulp and paper facility. Energy awareness
is increasing in the Northwest and across the nation, and Sirrine commends the efforts
of those promoting solutions to our energy needs.
The electrical efficiency review is a key element of demand -side management programs.
Sirrine has an extensive background applying electrical energy efficiency in utilization.
We are skilled at process energy balancing and identifying opportunities to recover
energy from processes in cost effective ways. Sirrine's experienced engineers have
performed audits and conservation studies for industrial, commercial, and govern-
mental facilities. Our recommendations have made substantial savings of energy
consumption. From such studies, we provide to our clients the construction cost
estimates and the equipment lists for implementation in their existing facilities.
The project team we are proposing is representative of the best technical talent available
in the industry today. Our five member team averages over ten years experience in the
Sirrine organization and over twenty -seven years experience in the industry. Our
project team is ready to begin work immediately upon authorization to proceed.
Thank you again for the opportunity to propose our engineering services. Let there be
no doubt in anyone's mind that we want to be your engineer for this important project.
Sincerely,
Peter J. Luciano
Michael Woodward
Business Developer Pulp and Paper Energy Manager
PJL /nrl
Enclosures
CRS Sirrine Engineers, Inc.
Suite 400
5000 Meadows
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035
503 624 -3000
Fax 503 624 -3001
A Subsidiary of CRSS Inc
Table of Contents
Section
Introduction 1
Project Scope 2
Project Team 3
Project Implementation Plan 4
and Schedule
Work Estimate and Comparison 5
Qualification and Experience 6
Resumes 7
Appendix 8
INTRODUCTION
CRS Sirrine Engineers, Inc. Sirrine) is a recognized national leader in the design of pulp
and paper mills. We have provided design specifications and engineering services to the
pulp and paper and central power station industries for over 80 years. Sirrine has an
extensive background in performing energy efficiency audits in mills. This experience and
knowledge of the industry, coupled with our experience over the past seven years working
with EPRI in their adjustable speed drive energy conservation program, well qualifies us to
perform an evaluation of your mill to identify alternatives for conservation of electrical
energy.
Sirrine proposes to accomplish the electrical conservation study with a team formed from
our Portland office and our Advanced Technology group located in our Raleigh, North
Carolina, office.
SCOPE OF WORK
The project consists of performing an electrical energy conservation study to identify
electrical and/or mechanical alternatives for retrofit or replacement thereby reducing the
electrical energy usage at the Daishowa America's Port Angeles pulp and paper mill.
Sirrine will perform an on -site review and audit of the electrical power distribution system
and electrical end use devices at the Daishowa facility. Our team will study the electric
power system, wood handling, TMP and refiners, paper machines, steam, water and
effluent treatment. Turbine generators and utility tie will be reviewed.
The study will consist of the identification of and evaluation of measures that are cost
effective and that will not require extensive analysis or study.
Sirrine will identify alternatives for future study that will require extensive analysis, but do
not fall within the scope of this electrical energy conservation study.
The findings, evaluation results, cost estimates and recommendations will be presented in
the form of a report.
The scope of work for the study does not include identification of measures that would alter
the current paper making process or change grades or quality of the manufactured products.
The study is expected to be completed within ten weeks.
i
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Port Angeles, Washington
ELECTRICAL EFFICIENCY REVIEW
PROJECT TEAM
PROCESS
Tom Meersman
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Port Angeles, Washington
Scott McLain
CRS SIRRINE ENGINEERS
PROJECT MANAGER
Mike Woodward
YAW. LAI. 111
ELECTRICAL AUDIT
Jim Poole
Don Flisram
DAISHOWA AMERICA
Port Angeles, Washington
PROJECT SPONSOR
Gail Dubuisson
PROJECT TEAM
CRS Sirrine Engineers, Inc. (Shrine) has assembled a strong project team to conduct your
electrical efficiency review of the Daishowa America Ltd., Port Angeles pulp and paper
facility. The proposed Shrine study team members have experience from the major areas
related to this project. They have abilities in power, process, operations management and
the engineering disciplines to understand the proper approach for this electrical energy
analysis. (Their resumes are included in Section 7.)
Gail Dubuisson, Project Sponsor
Shrine Northwest Division pulp and paper manager.
Twenty-eight years experience in pulp and paper consulting including process
design and detail engineering.
Broad based pulp and paper project engineering and project management for
various grades of product and process facilities.
Strategic planning for grass roots facilities with state -of -the -art processes and
technology.
Mike Woodward, Project Manager
Twenty -eight years experience in the pulp and paper industry including
engineering, operations, and management.
Power plant design engineering expertise including project management and project
engineering for capital construction projects from feasibility study through start-up.
Operations experience including maintenance manager and engineering
superintendent.
Jim Poole, Electrical Energy Auditor
Thirty-five years experience in pulp and paper engineering, power engineering, and
electrical energy efficiency.
Manager of Advanced Technology group responsible for adjustable speed drives
applications, power quality, and energy conservation.
Study author and seminar instructor for Electric Power Research Institute,
universities, and industry associations.
Tom Meersman, Process Consultant
Twenty -one years experience in pulp and paper operations, engineering, and market
development.
Process design and operations management of paper machines, digesters, refining,
bleach plant, and secondary fiber areas.
Study and estimate director, and operations design director for $100+ million
capital expansion projects.
Don Flisram, Electrical Energy Analyst
Twenty -four years experience in electrical systems design for pulp and paper,
heavy industry, and municipalities.
State of Oregon Certified Energy Auditor.
Engineering experience including electrical system retrofits of power distribution,
variable speed drives, lighting and controls.
Sirrine will execute a Secrecy Agreement with the client if necessary. Based on the project
security strategy, there are two types of information: Private information, which is so
stamped and signed and which is distributed to project team members on a need- to-know
basis; non private information which is suitable for general internal Sirrine distribution.
The project team is paper mill process knowledgeable, but intentionally does not include an
expert or consultant on TMP or refiner wood processing.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I An economic analysis will be performed for each of the energy conservation candidates to
determine the simple payback (the number of years required for the energy savings to equal
the capital cost). The data developed during the energy savings analysis and cost estimate
will be used to perform the economic analysis.
I A report will be prepared that will contain the following:
I
I
I The report will be sent to Daishowa America Ltd. for review and comment. Any comments
will be incorporated, the report completed and distributed.
I
I
I
I
I
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
The engineering activity will begin with the Project Manager leading the evaluation team
through an investigation and survey of the existing electrical and operating facilities at the
site. During the survey, energy conservation candidates will be identified that will not
require extensive analysis and they will be included in the study. Candidates that will
require extensive analysis will also be identified for future study, but will not be analyzed
as a part of this project. Data, information and design drawings for each of the candidates
that will be included in the study will be obtained while the team is at the site. The team
will review operating records and talk with operating personnel in regard to the selected
study candidates.
From the accumulated data, an evaluation will be performed to determine the energy
savings in kilowatt hours and the associated cost savings.
An order of magnitude cost estimate will be performed for each of the study candidates.
The field information necessary to perform the cost estimate will be obtained during the
initial site visit.
Summary
Introduction
Method of analysis
Description of each candidate
Economic results for each candidate
Recommended candidates for future study
CITY OF PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
FLOW CHART
Site Visit
Facilities Survey
i
Energy Conservation
Alternative Identification
i
Data Information
Collection
i
Evaluation Analysis
Energy Savings
Cost Analysis
i
Energy Conservation
Alternative Identification
Cost Estimate
Economic Analysis
Report Preparation
i
Publish Final Report
Alternative Identification
for Future Study
SCHEDULE
The attached schedule indicates that we can complete the project within a 10 -week period
from the date we are authorized to proceed with the study. The site survey activity will be
accomplished within the first three weeks of the project. The schedule is based on the
required information being available at the mill during our site survey.
r as r r r rr ail MO rr INN us rn as r r r r r
ACTIVITY
OE SCRIP IION
FACILITIES SURVEY
IDENTIFY ALTERNATIVES
DATA AND INFORMATION ACCUMULATION
REVIEW OF OPERATION RECORDS
INTERVIEW OPERATING PERSONNEL
OBTAIN ESTIMATING INFORMATION
DATA REDUCTION AND REVIEW
EVALUATION ANALYSIS
ENERGY SAVINGS COST ANALYSIS
COST ESTIMATES
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
REPORT PRE PARAIION
REVIEW BY DAISROWA AMERICA LTD
CONFIRM COMMENTS AND COMPLETE REPORT
PDDLISII nrront
i ecu.ur Bet /lvlr one.
I critical ecllrllr
Progress Bar
Pr lmarera Systems. Inc 194n loin
PrOlecl Start IAPIPII
Piolect Fuusn LINNOI
3 I
MKS
CITY OF PORT ANGELES /DAISHOWA AM.
ELECTRICAL ENERGY CONSERVATION STUDY
PORT ANGELES PULP ti PAPER F A C I L I I Y
O
Dale Dale 1APD91
Plot Date 2104091
Sneet I of I
mu
Revision
12 I Ise
Mec.eel i eoorovea
1
i
i
e
t
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
WORK ESTIMATE
The basis of this proposal is the City of Port Angeles "Request for Proposal for Technical
Service to Conduct an Electrical Efficiency Review at Daishowa America Ltd., Port
Angeles Pulp and Paper Facility," received at CRS Sirrine Engineers, Inc., Portland office
on March 18, 1991.
To estimate the manhours required to perform an electrical efficiency audit of Daishowa's
pulp and paper facility, assumptions were made regarding the number and types of
alternatives to consider The study proposed herein will consider all cost effective
alternatives including the application of variable speed drives, high efficiency motors, and
efficient lighting. This proposal estimate includes some front end process evaluation to
establish direction and maintain continuity through the study. It is assumed that twenty
alternatives will be considered and that estimated manhours will vary directly with the
actual number identified and considered.
Total
Manhours
Site Survey 205
Data Reduction 30
Evaluation 70
Savings Analysis 70
Cost Estimates 40
Economic Analysis 20
Report, Draft 60
Report, Final 20
Publish Report 40
Estimate Total 555
COMPARISON OF COST ESTIMATES
FOR SIMILAR PROJECTS
Weyerhaeuser Paper Company
Plymouth, North Carolina
Energy Evaluation
The Weyerhaeuser mill located at Plymouth, North Carolina, is an integrated 5 paper
machine, Kraft pulp and paper mill. The mill produces 2200 tons per day of bleached and
unbleached paper products. The mill produces 2000 tons per day of virgin pulp and
recycles 500 tons per day of waste paper to make secondary fiber. Two of the five paper
machines produce fine white paper. The utilities consist of one coal fired power boiler, one
combination boiler that burns wood waste and coal, one hogged fuel boiler that burns only
wood waste, one recovery boiler, seven turbine generators and a 40 megawatt utility
service.
An energy efficiency audit and evaluation was performed to reduce the mill overall energy
requirement. The following primary areas were evaluated:
Type of lighting and operating practice in regard to lighting usage.
Motor efficiency.
Control methods, adjustable speed drives as replacement for valves and dampers.
Process changes.
The manhour budget and actual manhour expenditure were as follows:
Item
Budget Actual
Field survey 320 MH 360 MH
Analysis 700 MH 600 MH
Economic evaluation 40 MH 40 MH
Report preparation 80 MH 100 MH
Total 1140 MH 1100 MH
Dixon Marquette Cement
Dixon, Illinois
Energy Evaluation
The Dixon Marquette Cement plant located at Dixon, Illinois, manufactures cement for use
in the construction industry. The plant consists of crushers that are used to pulverize the
limestone rock that is mined on -site and a process plant that includes 4 kilns. The kilns are
fired with pulverized coal. The plant electrical load is approximately 10 megawatts.
An energy efficiency audit and evaluation was performed to reduce the plant electrical
energy requirement. The following primary areas were evaluated:
Type of lighting and operating practice in regard to lighting usage.
Motor efficiency.
Control methods, adjustable speed drives as replacement for valves and dampers.
The manhour budget and actual manhours expenditure were as follows:
Item
Budget Actual
Field survey 100 MH 811\11-1
Analysis 250 MH 220 MH
Economic evaluation 27 MH 27 MH
Report preparation 40 MH 40 MH
Report presentation 78 MH 77 MH
Total 495 MH 445 MH
—I
CRS Sirrine has long served the pulp and paper industry in the design of new mills, plant
expansions, and modernization programs. We have been the principle designer for
hundreds of major pulp and paper projects.
CRSS has the talent and experience to construct, design, or modify pulp and paper mills,
converting facilities, power plants, and other industrial buildings. Our projects have totaled
in excess of $10 billion in construction costs and include more than 20 grass roots mills
and 65 paper machines. With approximately 80 percent repeat business, our experience
speaks for our expertise.
Designs for complete production facilities or specialized portions include:
Power Boilers
power generation
refining
chemical recovery
paper production
pulp washing
bleaching
digesting
Designed twenty-nine power boiler installations in the past ten years utilizing pulverized
coal, stoker coal, bark and wood refuse, gas, oil, sludge and noncondensible gases.
Particulate collection systems included mechanical dust collectors, bag houses, electrostatic
precipitators and wet scrubbers. Designed both wet and dry SO desulfurization systems.
Have designed the installation of circulating fluidized bed combustion units. In addition,
we presently have an engineering assignment and are presently out for bids on two
circulating fluidized bed units.
turbine Generators
Designed 24 industrial type extraction and condensing turbine generators in the past ten
years. Familiar with foreign technology. Presently designed one of the largest industrial
steam turbine generator installations ever installed in a paper mill. This is a 73MW /85MVA
double automatic extraction condensing unit.
Power Distribution
PULP AND PAPER EXPERIENCE
woodyards
water /wastewater treatment
materials handling/storage
warehousing
finishing
coating
converting
Sirrine has wide experience in large industrial electrical system analysis and design. In
the last eight years nine large (over 20MW) generators have been installed, and four mill
distribution systems have been extensively modified by Sirrine. These projects include the
installation of two 56MVA generators, the installation of an almost totally new distribution
system designed to accommodate one 32MVA and two 45MVA generators with a utility tie,
PULP AND PAPER EXPERIENCE
Page 2
and one project which included the reconnection of existing mill buses to improve
reliability. These projects usually include interim power system arrangements which
are more complex than the existing or planned systems.
TMP Refining
Sirrine has designed seven new, complete TMP refining facilities in the last ten years.
Total designed capacity exceeds 4500 TPD of thermo mechanical pulp. TMP projects
have included three stage refining, peroxide bleaching, integration with secondary fiber,
new and existing paper machines, newsprint, and lightweight coated grades.
Hood/Chip Processing
Sirrine has provided design engineering for eleven major log and chip processing
facilities in the last several years. Over half these facilities were designed to process long
or tree length logs utilizing full length barking and chipping or slashing and conventional
chipping. Sirrine has extensive experience in portal and jib crane applications. Our chip
screening storage and reclaim designs have included the most innovative stacker reclaimers
and chip screening and slicing systems in operation today.
Digesting
Designed eight major digester installations with combined pulping capacities in excess of
5400 -tpd. Included batch digesters, Kamyr digesters, M &D digesters cooking hardwood
and softwood chips, and sawdust to make both bleached and unbleached grades.
Washing
Designed 15 major installations with combined capacities in excess of 10,000 -tpd.
Washing installations included gravity drum washers, countercurrent vacuum filter
washers, in digester washing, diffusion washing.
Screening_and Cleaning
Designed numerous pulp screening and cleaning systems. Includes centrifugal and
centripetal screens with both holes and slots. Cleaning installations include high and
low consistency forward flow cleaners, as well as reverse flow cleaners.
Paper Mjchinea
Designed fourteen new machine installations and twenty-eight major rebuilds within the
last ten years. These installations include machines from all major manufacturers.
t
1
t
t
t
PULP AND PAPER EXPERIENCE
Page 3
Recovery Boilers
Designed seven "direct fired" new recovery boiler installations in the past ten years.
One installation is the largest unit ever installed in North America. Also involved in ten
recovery boiler "rebuilds" in the past fifteen years plus additional precipitator retrofit
projects. Completely familiar with foreign recovery boiler technology. Active in the
Black Liquor Recovery Boiler Advisory Committee.
Evaporators /Concentrators
Designed nine major installations with combined capacities exceeding 4,000,000 pounds
per hour of evaporation. The units range from a three- effect waste heat evaporator to a
seven effect high solids unit. Capacities range from 71,000 pounds per hour to 1,100,000
pounds per hour of evaporation. The installations include LTV, falling film, and forced
circulation type units.
Causticizing Svems
Designed numerous causticizing systems with the most recent experience including both
white liquor and lime mud pressure filtration equipment. The pressure filtration equipment
is one of only three installations in North America.
Lime Kilns
Designed six major installations with combined capacities in excess of 1,200 -tpd of
burnt lime production. Recent experience included kiln designed to operate at less than
six million BTU per ton of lime and utilizes a low energy high pressure drop hydraulic
scrubber.
Environmental
Sirrine has furnished environmental information for more than 100 industrial projects.
Designed over 100 installations for controlling gaseous and particulate emissions from
manufacturing processes and from fuel burning units. Designed over 200 wastewater
treatment facilities, including tertiary and advanced treatment.
PRINCIPAL PULP AND PAPER MILL PROJECTS
NORTHWEST DIVISION, PORTLAND, OREGON
1983 to Present
Boise Cascade Corporation, DeRidder, Louisiana
Package Boiler Installation
Black Liquor Storage
Secondary Fibers Plant Installation
Statistical Quality Control System Consultation
Boise Cascade Corporation, International Falls, Minnesota
Bark Boiler Modifications
Boise Cascade Corporation, International Falls and Ft. Frances, Ontario
Optimization Study
Water Treatment Plant Consultation
Design of Oxygen/Alkali Bleach Stage for Hard Wood And Soft Wood
Boise Cascade Corporation, Rumford, Maine
Long Range Planning Study
Boise Cascade Corporation, St. Helens, Oregon
Recovery Boiler Precipitator
Recovery Boiler Low Odor Conversion Study
Winder Rebuild and New Winder Installation
Brown Stock Washer Line Rebuild
Alder Chip Handling Study
No. 2 Felt Roll Dryer Drive Design
Design for Chlorine Dioxide Injection and Oxygen Bleaching System
Basic Data and Energy Balance Study
Mill Wide Water Balance Study
Paper Machine Reconfiguration Study
Cogeneration Study
Roll Wrap Study
Roll Wrap PLC Control System
Roll Label Computer Systems
Three (3) Paper Machine CD Computer Control Systems
Mill Wide Steam System Study
Package Boiler Installation
Recovery Boiler Precipitator Study
Boise Cascade Corporation, Salem, Oregon
Demolition and Sitework
Warehouse Floor Modifications
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
Principal Pulp and Paper Mill Projects
Page 2
Boise Cascade Corporation, Steilacoom, Washington
Roll Wrap Study
No. 3 Paper Machine Wet End Reconfiguration
Boise Cascade Corporation, Vancouver, British Columbia Ontario, Canada
Kenora Mill Field Assistance
Boise Cascade Corporation, Vancouver, Washington
Secondary Fiber Study
CD Paper Machine Controls
Off Machine Coater Drive Replacement
Pre refining Cost Estimate
CB Carbonless Coater Plant Design
Carbonless Coater Building Condensation Project
Carbonless Paper Storage Expansion
Clarifier Effluent Overflow Study and Pump Modification
Coater Test Lab Study and Design
Detail Design for Installation of Three New Carbonless Winders
Detail Design to Reactivate existing Scrubber System for No. 1 Boiler
High- Density Pumps Drive Variable Speed Retrofit
No. 1 Paper Machine Felt Air Heating Unit Relocation
Phase II Estimate for Shipping Dock Loading Safety Devices
Roll Splitting and Winding System
Winder Relocation
Control Systems Installation and Start-up Supervision
Paper Machine Rebuild, Winder, Roll Wrap, and Roll Labeling System
Water Conservation Study
No. 2 Boiler Scrubber Operations Consultation.
Refiners Safety Relief System
No. 3 Paper Machine Broke System
No. 3 Winder Bridge Fabrication and Installation
No. 1 Boiler Economizer Replacement
Fuel Oil Supply System Replacement
Boise Cascade Corporation, Wallula, Oregon
Various Mill Modification Cost Estimates
Cogeneration Study
Kamyr Chip Handling System Replacement
Boise Cascade Canada, Ltd., St. Frances, Ontario
Mill Wide Control System Study
Principal Pulp and Paper Mill Projects
Page 3
Federal Paper Board Company, Los Angeles, California
Vat Former Section Evaluation
Georgia Pacific Corporation, Bellingham, Washington
Consultation for Roll Handling Installation
Georgia Pacific Corporation, Toledo, Oregon
R.B. Soot Blower Control System Design and Hardware
Bulk Starch Control System Design and Hardware
Grays Harbor Paper Company, Hoquiam, Washington
New Winder and Calender Stack
Paper Machine Area Evaluation
Estimate for Loading Dock Extension
Steam System modifications
ITT Rayonier, Inc., Hoquiam, Washington
Deinking Facility
International Paper Company, Gardiner, Oregon
Lime Kiln and Back -up NCG Burner Safety System
Landfill Electrical Design
Paper Machine Roll and Drive Modification
Pipe Bridge Analysis and Design
Refiner Estimate.
James River Corporation, (formerly CZ Corp.) St. Francisville, Louisiana
Coated Paper Machine and Groundwood Mill Rebuild
James River Corporation, (formerly CZ Corp.) Wauna, Oregon
No. 3 Paper Machine Rebuild Study and Design
Groundwood Mill Study and Design
Groundwood Pulp Bleaching Study
Menasha Corporation, Otsego, Michigan
300 TPD Secondary Fiber System
No. 1 Paper Machine Rebuild
North Pacific Paper Corporation, Longview, Washington
Bleach Optimization Project
Paper Machine Process Control Project
Principal Pulp and Paper Mill Projects
Page 4
Potlatch Corporation, Lewiston, Idaho
Turbine Generator Study
Paper Machine Rebuild Electrical Assistance
Simpson Paper Company, Anderson, California
Consultation for Roll Handling Installation
Simpson Paper Company, (formerly Jamer River Corporation)
St. Francisville, Louisiana
Coating Plant Automation
Smurfit Newsprint Company, Newberg, Oregon
Miscellaneous Process Control Projects
Smurfit Newsprint Company, Oregon City, Oregon
Spill Containment Study
Hog Fuel Boiler Modification Study
Mill Modernization Study
Miscellaneous Electrical and Process Control Projects
Stone Container Corporation, Missoula, Montana
OCC Plant Study
Weyerhaeuser Company, Springfield, Oregon
No. 1 Paper Machine Winder Installation
Evaporator Control Modernization Study and Cost Estimate
No. 1 Paper Machine Accuray Control System Installation
No 1 Paper Machine Rebuild Estimate
No.2 Paper Machine Secondary Headbox
No.2 Paper Machine Top Former Study and Cost Estimate
Weyerhaeuser Company, Cosmopolis, Washington
Brown Stock Washing Study
Oxygen Delignification Study and Design
VARIABLE FREQUENCY ELECTRIC DRIVE EXPERIENCE
c
CRS Sirrine Engineers, Inc. has provided design specifications and engineering services to
pulp and paper, heavy chemical and industrial, and central power station industries for
nearly 80 years.
Typical projects include a comprehensive array of drives, motors (up to 15,000 HP) with
emphasis upon speed control systems. Over the years, designs have been completed for
hundreds of installations involving literally thousands of AC and DC variable speed drives.
The Sirrine experience with variable frequency speed control systems for electric motor
drives spans a wide range of horsepower sizes and applications. Our services capability
includes economic and technical feasibility studies, specification preparation, vendor
evaluation and coordination, and design of installations.
Representative projects include:
Electric Power Research Institute
Palo Alto, California
Sirrine provided engineering services required for a comprehensive study for developing
the criteria for equipment application, selection, budgeting, and installation of state- of -the-
art, off -the -shelf adjustable speed drives. The study included the survey and application of
adjustable speed drives in all major industrial and electric utility markets in the continental
United States. The effort concentrated on the comparison of variable frequency electrical
drives with other electrical, mechanical, and steam -driven drives. The study included
development and engineering design of five industrial installations ranging from 7.5 to
1500 HP, including follow -up testing and reporting of operation experience. Sirrine and
EPRI also conducted scheduled training workshops on the application and selection of
variable speed drives, including available results, as the study progressed.
City of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois
Sirrine is in the process of conducting a study and overall system analysis from a system
perspective of the City of Chicago water pumping stations. The study consists of
evaluating technical and economic options to replace the existing drive systems at the five
steam water pumping stations. The study also includes evaluating the installation of A -C
variable frequency drives and back -up power systems at the six electrical water pumping
stations.
Dixon Marquette Cement Company
Dixon, Illinois
Sirrine provided engineering services to perform an energy audit and conservation analysis
for the production facilities. The conservation analysis included the application of
adjustable speed drives to save electrical energy.
I
1
t
s
I
I
I
Weyerhaeuser Company
Plymouth, North Carolina
Sirrine provided engineering services to perform an energy audit and conservation analysis
including evaluating the process.
Weyerhaeuser Paper Company
Plymouth, North Carolina
t
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
Ontario Hydro
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Sirrine provided engineering services for conducting an ASD seminar for Ontario Hydro
personnel and to assist Ontario Hydro with their ASD pilot rebate program.
Weyerhaeuser Paper Company
Columbus, Mississippi
Sirrine developed specifications, provided vendor evaluations and coordination, and
installation design for three variable frequency drive systems for boiler fan operations.
These systems were of the load commutated inverter type, and were drives for an induced
draft fan at 2250 HP, 900 RPM; a forced draft fan at 1250 HP, 1200 RPM; and a primary
air fan at 1000 HP, 13.8 kV /2.4 kV transformer. The system provided 100 percent speed
range capability, flexible speed control, and regenerative deceleration capability. The
installation has been a very successful application for boiler combustion air control.
Feasibility study for installation of a 2500 HP hogged fuel induced draft variable speed fan.
Weyerhaeuser Paper Company
New Bem, North Carolina
Completed feasibility study for installation of a 2000 HP variable speed booster fan. Study
was based on very large motors available from Westinghouse and Toshiba (drives available
up to the 50,000 HP range).
Variable speed drives have been installed at Weyerhaeuser's Plymouth complex in various
projects as follows:
Sirrine Project No. R -1533 No. 2 Hog Fuel Boiler included seven drives for the
bark screws in the bark bin. Inverters were rated 50 KVA with screw motors of
30 HP.
Sirrine Project No. R -1665 No. 7 Evaporators included four drives in the
following applications:
Cooling water booster pump, 400 HP motor, 400 KVA inverter.
Paralleled on -line products pumps, 100 HP motors, 100 KVA inverters.
Sirrine Project No. R -1740 Lime Mud Washer included two drives for the
underflow pumps, 30 HP with 30 KVA inverters.
Ontario Hydro
Toronto, Canada
Sirrine prepared an "ASD Assessment Guidebook" and assisted Ontario Hydro in
developing their Adjustable Speed Drive Rebate Program.
Adjustable Speed Drive Workshops
Sirrine has presented a two-day workshop covering ASD technology, power quality, and
ASD applications for the following utilities and their customers:
Bonneville Power Administration (2)
Commonwealth Edison (1)
Consolidated Edison (1)
Niagara Mohawk (4)
Ontario Hydro (1)
Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company (4)
San Diego Gas and Electric Company (1)
TVA (1)
co
o
AG
k
I
1
I
I
I
e
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
KEY PERSONNEL
C. GAIL DUBUISSON, P.E.
PULP PAPER MANAGER
EDUCATION:
REGISTRATION:
SUMMARY OF
EXPERIENCE:
EXPERIENCE:
CRS SIRRINE ENGINEERS, INC.
B.S., Chemical Engineering, Mississippi State University, 1962.
40 -Hour Value Engineering Workshop, Society of American
Value Engineers.
Professional Engineer, Alabama, Georgia and Texas
Over twenty-eight years experience in the pulp and paper industry,
primarily in consulting, design engineering and management.
Served as Process Engineer, Project Engineer, Project Manager,
Pulping Process Staff Manager, Process Engineering Manager, and
Manager of Pulp and Paper Engineering. Managed grassroots and
expansion projects utilizing hardwoods, softwoods and bagasse for
the production of bleached market pulp, newsprint, linerboard,
sack, corrugating medium, coated and uncoated bleached board and
fine papers. Project locations have been in Brazil, Mexico, Egypt,
Portugal, Venezuela; Gabon, Africa, and in the Northern and
Southern areas of the United States.
Secondary fiber experience includes conceptual study for Smurfit
Linerboard Mill in Venezuela; Portucel mill in Viana, Portugal;
Alabama News in Monroeville, Alabama and planned deinked pulp
mill for Caithness -King.
Senior Consultant for the following Strategic Planning Projects:
Portucel; Lisbon, Portugal. Performed a valuation for eight
Portucel mills located throughout Portugal using both
engineered approach and business techniques. The mills
included five pulp and/or paper and three converting
operations.
Confidential Client. Performed data development and
analysis to evaluate existing mills for acquisition or joint
venture and site selection for a grass roots pulp and
paper mill.
Confidential Client. Analysis and development of 5 and 10
year plan to assist a client in developing a eucalyptus/gmelina
plantation and integrating into present and future mill
operations.
C. GAIL DUBUISSON
PAGE 2
4/90
Technical Direct/Manager for Aracruz Celulosa S.A., Aracruz,
Brazil, mill optimization project utilizing the services of Natron-
Simons in Sao Paulo.
Manager of Process and Mechanical Engineering responsible for
development and maintenance of the process and mechanical
engineering capability. Managed process engineering activities
for numerous projects including:
Mead Corporation, Chillicothe, Ohio, rebuild of No. 23
and No. 10 paper machines.
Temple Eastex, Inc., Evadale, Texas, replaced No. 2 paper
machine air -knife coater with combination blade /rod/bar
coater.
Champion International Corporation, Canton, North
Carolina, rebuild of No. 12 and No. 19 paper machines.
Nekoosa Edwards Paper Company, Ashdown, Arkansas,
mill expansion to increase daily production from 550 TPD
to 1200 TPD.
International Paper Company, Mansfield, Louisiana,
grassroots linerboard and corrugating medium pulp and
paper mill.
Leaf River Paper Company, New Augusta, Mississippi,
conceptual engineering for a grassroots bleached pulp mill.
Manager of Pulp and Paper in Mobile, Alabama. Established an
engineering department in Mobile, Alabama to offer engineering
services within the Southeast. Projects included:
Scott Paper Company, Mobile, Alabama, paper mill
modifications.
Celulose E Papel de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico, mill
optimization study.
Leaf River Paper Company, New Augusta, Mississippi,
lime kiln and recausticizing areas for a grassroots market
pulp mill.
C. GAIL DUBUISSON
PAGE 3
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE: 28
4/90
Project Engineering Manager for projects including:
Eastex, Inc., Evadale, Texas, mill expansion project,
including modifications to the woodyard and pulp mill.
Project involved new pulping line with displacement
bleaching and a new recovery boiler complex.
St. Regis Paper Company, Monticello, Mississippi,
conceptual design and cost estimate.
Georgia Pacific Corporation, Monticello, Mississippi,
mill expansion project, including modifications for the
woodyard, pulp mill, recovery area on conversion of
No. 1 paper machine from sack paper to linerboard.
Southland Paper Company, Lufkin, Texas, dust removal
system for an existing bark fired boiler.
Process Engineer for projects including the following:
International Paper Company, Pine Bluff, Arkansas, new
four -stage CEHD bleach plant, including bleach chemical
preparation.
Nekoosa Edwards Paper Company, Ashdown, Arkansas,
bleach plant and bleach chemical preparation for a grassroots
mill.
Champion Paper, Mogi Guacu, Brazil, pulp mill expansion
including an Esco continuous digester, brownstock washing
and bleaching to produce eucalyptus pulp.
Plant engineering staff for Gulf States Paper Corporation in
Demopolis, Alabama, performing miscellaneous maintenance and
capital projects throughout the mill.
KEY PERSONNEL
MICHAEL WOODWARD, P.E.
ENERGY MANAGER, PULP PAPER DIVISION
EDUCATION:
REGISTRATION:
SUMMARY OF
EXPERIENCE:
EXPERIENCE:
CRS SIRRINE ENGINEERS, INC.
B.S., Applied Science and Mechanical Engineering, Portland State
University, 1970.
Professional Engineer Oregon
Over twenty-eight years experience in the pulp and paper industry,
including power plant design engineering and project management.
Served as Project Engineer, Engineering Superintendent,
Maintenance Manager and Project Manager. Managed capital
construction projects from feasibility through start-up, including
scheduling, procurement, contracting and commissioning.
Energy Manager, CRS Sirrine Engineers, Inc. Responsible for
power and material handling project engineering services including
manpower allocation and assurance of technical quality of work; also
functions as project consultant for studies, estimates and initial
phases of projects.
Staff Engineer, Boise Cascade Corporation, St. Helens, Oregon.
Preliminary work for replacement of regenerative heat exchanger
with long -flow economizer. Auxiliary work includes water coil air
heater, ash handling, soot blowers, breaching, new feed water
pumps, and building modifications.
Ahlstrom Machinery, Inc., Roswell, Georgia. Investigated efficiency
of high solids firing in black liquor chemical recovery boilers.
Reviewed latest technology, boiler efficiencies, and experiences in
processing, handling and burning of Kraft pulping process waste
liquor with up to 80 percent solids.
Georgia Pacific, Ashdown, Arkansas. Provided engineering
services for black liquor evaporators and recovery boiler
improvements. Performed energy efficiency audit of black liquor
evaporation. Work included project management of an additional
falling -film evaporator body, precipitator ash handling improve-
ments, recovery boiler steam purity study, installation of additional
soot blowers, non condensible gas handling improvements.
Project Manager, Georgia Pacific, Ashdown, Arkansas. Recovery
boiler low odor conversion. Replaced boiler bottom with composite
tubes, three levels of combustion air with new draft fans, new long
MICHAEL WOODWARD
PAGE 2
1 /91
flow economizer, two chamber dry bottom electrostatic precipitator,
ash handling, 68 percent black liquor fuel system, auxiliary oil and
gas fuel system. Performed efficiency study, then modified
evaporators with addition of falling film concentrator and heavy
black liquor storage system.
Project Manager, Georgia Pacific, Ashdown, Arkansas. Recovery
boiler installation including evaporators, precipitator, feedwater
pumps, demineralizers, green and white liquor clarifiers, causticizer,
R -8 chlorine dioxide plant conversion. Single -Drum boiler rated
4.5 million lb /day dry solids; 1.07 million lb /day evaporation, falling
film evaporator plant.
Project Engineer, Georgia- Pacific, Ashdown, Arkansas. Feasibility
study for mill expansion from 1500 TPD to 2400 TPD bleached pulp
and uncoated free sheet fine paper. Study included wood supply,
woodyard, digesters, brown stock washing, bleach plant, paper
machine, converting, warehouse, air and water permitting.
Project Engineer, Georgia Pacific, Ashdown, Arkansas.
Economizer replacement in recovery boiler. Remove drum type
economizer, and replace with modules during short shut -down.
Maintenance Manager, Boise Cascade Corporation, St. Helens,
Oregon. Directed maintenance activities for bleached kraft pulp mill,
three uncoated free -sheet paper machines, one tissue machine, and
a converting plant. Major work included upgrading power plant
controls to distributed controls (DCS).
Maintenance Manager, Boise Cascade Corporation, Salem, Oregon.
Directed maintenance and plant engineering activities for bleached
sulfite mill, four uncoated free -sheet paper machines, converting
plant, and a yeast plant.
Engineering Superintendent, Boise Cascade Corporation, Salem,
Oregon. Supervised plant engineering department. Directed
activities of project engineers and designers; developed capital
budget. Projects included paper machine modifications, digester
improvements, converting modernization, process and boiler
controls, and building construction.
Senior Project Engineer, Boise Cascade Corporation, Salem,
Oregon. Responsible for various mill projects from conception
to start -up. Areas of work included sulfite pulping, red liquor
recovery boiler, vapor recompression falling film evaporators,
stock preparation, paper machines, and converting.
Project Engineer, Boise Cascade Corporation, Vancouver,
Washington. Responsible for design and implementation of mill
projects. Areas of work included waste paper handling, fine paper
machines, off machine coaters, roll wrapping, converting, and
warehouse.
f
MICHAEL WOODWARD
PAGE 3
MEMBERSHIPS:
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE:
1 /91
Designer, Boise Cascade Corporation, Wallula, Washington.
Responsible for design on various mill projects. Project
administrator on small improvement projects. Work included
recovery boiler and recausticizing improvements; paper machine
improvements, and brown stock washing improvements.
Designer, Weyerhaeuser Corporation, Centralia, Washington.
Member of research and development team to implement new
technology in kraft paper converting. Developed paper impregnator,
continuous honeycomb converter, and continuous curing oven.
Draftsman, John D. Swift and Associates, Olympia, Washington.
Land surveying and development company. Responsible for drafting
plats,municipal utilities, civil improvements, power distribution.
Technical Association of Pulp Paper Industry.
28
KEY PERSONNEL
JAMES N. POOLE
MANAGER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
EDUCATION:
REGISTRATION:
EXPERIENCE:
CRS SIRRINE ENGINEERS, INC.
Furman University, 1 year
Electrical Institute of Technology at Los Angeles, 1 year
International Correspondence School, 4 years, Electrical
Engineering Power, 1960
Clemson University, P. E. Refresher Course
Furman University Management Seminar
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Program for Technical
Managers
Qualified in Electrical Engineering and Project Management
South Carolina, North Carolina, Florida, Georgia, Virginia, Maine,
Wisconsin, Alabama, Pennsylvania.
Manager Advanced Technology, CRS Sirrine Engineers, Inc.
Responsible for ASD applications, power quality and energy
conservation; serves as technical consultant and project manager on
designated projects. Projects include:
Dixon Marquette Cement, Dixon, Illinois. Performed an energy
audit and conservation analysis for the production facilities.
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Variable Frequency
Adjustable Speed Drive Research and Application Project.
Ontario Hydro, Toronto, Canada. Preparation of an ASD
assessment guidebook and development of an ASD rebate program.
Consolidated Edison Company, New York, New York. Adjustable
speed drive project.
City of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 68th Street Water Pumping
Station A -C variable frequency drive installation.
City of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Water pumping system; overall
system analysis and drive system study.
Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Prepared and presented ASD seminars.
Niagara Mohawk, Syracuse, New York. Prepared and presented
ASD seminars.
JAMES N. POOLE
Page 2
3/91
Scott Paper Company, Chester, Pennsylvania. Study for the rebuild
of No. 8 and No. 10 Paper Machines.
P. H. Glatfelter Company, Spring Grove, Pennsylvania. Design
for the installation of supercalender, winder and rereeler.
Previous experience included:
Self Employed, James N. Poole, P.E. Electrical Engineering
Consultant. Projects included:
Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California. Adjustable
Speed Drive Research Project.
Burroughs Wellcome Company, Greenville, North Carolina. Plant
Power System Survey.
Vice President, Manager of Engineering Design, CRS Sirrine, Inc.
Responsible for engineering design for the North Carolina Division;
also served as technical consultant and project manager on
designated projects. Projects included:
Union Camp Corporation, Franklin, Virginia. Electrical distribution
system reconfiguration and replacement of all 15 KV switchgear
with new vacuum switchgear for a 120 MW system.
J. R. Simplot, Pocatello, Idaho. 16,900 KW turbine generator.
Manager Power and Process Engineering, CRS Sirrine, Inc.
Responsible for conceptual engineering for Utility Power, Industrial
Power, Process, Material Handling, Forest Products, Staff
Engineering, and Environmental; also served as project manager and
technical consultant on reports and estimates and other designated
projects. Projects included:
Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts. Conceptual study for
total energy plant.
Burroughs Wellcome Company, Greenville, North Carolina. Plant
electrical power survey and power study, including short circuit
analysis and protective device coordination.
Scott Paper Company, Mobile, Alabama. Report and estimate for
recovery boiler, combination power boiler, boiler auxiliaries, set of
evaporators, 45 MW turbine generator and 61 MW turbine
generator.
Weyerhaeuser Company, Plymouth, North Carolina. Design
engineering for a new 500,000 PPH coal/wood -fired boiler with
provision for burning peat in the future; boiler is rated 1300 psig,
925 °F.
JAMES N. POOLE
Page 3
3/91
Weyerhaeuser Company, Rothschild, Wisconsin. Report and
estimate for paper machine rebuild, new secondary fiber system and
new pressure washer system; design engineering for new high
density system, stock preparation modernization, and digester
control system.
Weyerhaeuser Company, Plymouth, North Carolina. Design
engineering for converting 500,000 PPH boiler from oil -fired to
coal/wood fired, including the addition of a new precipitator and the
design of a new coal yard and unloading and handling facilities.
Weyerhaeuser Company, Plymouth, North Carolina. Report and
estimate for new recovery boilers, coal/wood -fired power boilers
and turbine- generators; 10 -year power plant master plan for retiring
old equipment and installing new equipment.
Senior Staff Engineer/Project Manager, CRS Sirrine, Inc.
Responsible for electrical system studies, reports and estimates;
design project management on power plants. Projects included:
Greensboro Lumber Company, Greensboro, Georgia. Installation
of a used 7500 KW condensing turbine- generator and new cooling
tower, steam to drive turbine- generator is generated in a refuse
wood -fired boiler.
B W Construction, Akron, Ohio. Electrical design for an SO2
scrubber installation for a 350 MW fossil fuel steam plant at
Lakeland, Florida.
Allied Chemical Corporation, Columbia, South Carolina. Plant
electrical power system study including short circuit analysis and
protective device coordination.
Weyerhaeuser Company, Doswell, Virginia. Report and estimate
for a new 100,000 PPH wood -fired boiler, 7.5 MW steam turbine
driven generator, and material handling facilities.
Ecusta Paper Division, Olin Corporation, Pisgah Forest, North
Carolina. Machine drive replacement for Nos. 2 and 8 Paper
Machines.
Weyerhaeuser Company, Plymouth, North Carolina. Report and
estimate for a new coal yard and coal handling facilities; converting
four oil -fired boilers to coal firing and adding precipitators to each
boiler for environmental control.
Weyerhaeuser Company, Plymouth, North Carolina. Power system
study including short circuit, load flow transient stability and relay
studies; plant generating capacity 130 MW plus a 40 MW utility tie.
JAMES N. POOLE
Page 4
3/91
Occidental Chemicals Company, White Springs, Florida.
Installation of a new 12,500 KW turbine- generator.
Champion International, Canton, North Carolina. Design and
installation of a 10,000 KW turbine- generator.
Lincoln Pulp and Paper Company, Lincoln, Maine. Electrical
secondary study, report and estimate.
Union Camp Corporation, Savannah, Georgia. Power system
study, report and estimate including short circuit, load flow, and
transient stability studies; plant generating capacity, 110 MW plus a
45 MW utility tie.
Weyerhaeuser Company, New Bern, North Carolina. Mill electrical
power system short circuit study.
Federal Paper Board Company, Riegelwood, North Carolina. Mill
electrical power system protective device coordination study and
design and installation of a 30,000 KW turbine- generator.
Senior Departmental Project Engineer, CRS Sirrine, Inc.
Responsible for electrical engineering design on assigned projects.
Projects included:
Union Camp Corporation, Savannah, Georgia. 1350 ton recovery
boiler, 45 MW utility service, centralized computer control system
for one new and two existing recovery boilers, new set of
evaporators, and water pollution control facilities.
Federal Paper Board, Versailles, Connecticut. New waste
hydrapulper system.
U. S. Plywood- Champion, Canton, North Carolina. New 900 ton
recovery boiler.
Union Camp Corporation, Franklin, Virginia. New 500 ton
recovery boiler, 400,000 PPH power boiler, 20 MW turbine
generator, paper machine, bleach plant pulp mill, and support
facilities; studies included short circuit analysis, load flow and
protective device coordination.
Weyerhaeuser Company, Plymouth, North Carolina. New 1500
ton recovery boiler, 500,000 PPH hog fuel boiler, 30 MW turbine
generator, 40 MW turbine- generator, paper machine, bleach plant,
pulp mill, woodyard and support facilities.
Departmental Project Engineer, CRS Sirrine, Inc. Projects included:
JAMES N. POOLE
Page 5
3/91
Consolidated Paper, Inc., Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin. New 400
ton recovery boiler, 400,000 PPH power boiler, 20 MW turbine
generator, pulp mill, bleach plant, wet lap machine, woodyard and
support facilities; studies included short circuit analysis and
protective device coordination.
S. D. Warren Company, Muskegon, Michigan. New 250,000 PPH
power boiler, 12.5 MW turbine- generator and paper machine;
studies included short circuit analysis and protective device
coordination.
Champion Papers, Inc., Canton, North Carolina. New 900 ton
recovery boiler, pulp mill, and paper machine.
S. D. Warren Company, Muskegon, Michigan. New 250 ton
recovery boiler, evaporators, pulp mill and woodyard.
Union Camp Corporation, Franklin, Virginia. New 400 ton
recovery boiler.
Electrical Design Engineer, CRS Sirrine, Inc. Projects included:
Continental Can Company, Augusta, Georgia. Electrical design for
woodyard, water treatment and causticizing areas.
Field Electrical Engineer, CRS Sirrine, Inc. Responsible for
inspection, checkout, and start-up of electrical systems for a new
300 TPD pulp and paper mill for Marathon Southern, Butler,
Alabama.
Electrical Designer, CRS Sirrine, Inc.
PUBLICATIONS: "Plant Distribution System Modernization for Present and Future
Expansion Requirements." Presented at the I.E.E.E. Pulp and Paper
Conference, Montreal, Canada, June 22, 1972.
"Plant Electrical Power System Expansion from 60 to 160
Megawatts." Presented at the I.E.E.E. Pulp and Paper Conference,
San Francisco, California, June 1977.
"Retrofit Of A Recovery Boiler I.D. Fan With A Dual Channel High
Reliability LCI Drive." Presented at I.E.E.E. Pulp and Paper
Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, June 1988.
"ASD Industrial Applications." Presented at the Industrial Energy
Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, September 12, 1989.
"Adjustable Speed Drive (ASD) Application Evaluation
Methodology Presented at CCE National Congress 90, Calgary,
Alberta, April 3, 1990.
JAMES N. POOLE
Page 6
TEACHING Motor Applications and Variable Speed Drives Clemson
ASSIGNMENTS: University, May 1987; April 1988; April 1989; April 1990,
April 1991.
Power Systems Seminar Short Course Clemson University,
March 1975.
Power Systems Seminar Long Course Clemson University,
November 1975; March 1977; March 1978; March 1979; March
1980; March 1981; March 1982; March 1983; April 1984; October
1985; October 1986; October 1987; October 1988; October 1989
North Carolina State University, November 1977 and October 1982.
NASA, February 1986.
Carolina Power and Light Company, Raleigh, North Carolina,
February 1991.
E. I. duPont, Aiken, South Carolina, December 1986.
Duke Power, Charlotte, North Carolina, February 1991.
MEMBERSHIPS: Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
National Society of Professional Engineers
Professional Engineers of North Carolina
Consulting Engineers Council (ACEC)
TOTAL YEARS EXPERIENCE: 36
YEARS WITH CRSS: 35
3/91
r
KEY PERSONNEL
THOMAS A. MEERSMAN
SENIOR PROCESS CONSULTANT
CRS SIRRINE ENGINEERS, INC.
EDUCATION: B.S., Pulp and Paper Science, and B.S. Chemistry, Western
Michigan University. Honors Graduate, 1969.
EXPERIENCE: Process Consultant, CRS Sirrine Engineers, Inc., Portland,
Oregon. Responsible for project management, process design, and
business development efforts on specific projects and with specific
clients.
Provided process design assistance on 100 TPD recycled fiber
system for xerographic and bond grades. Grays Harbor,
Hoquiam, Washington.
Worked in areas of business development, project management
and process design for 300 TPD mixed office waste system to
deinked pulp for market pulp for bond, xerographic grades, and
tissue.
Operations Manager, Gaylord Container Corporation, Antioch,
California. Responsible for production, maintenance, engineering
and technical functions for mill with over 500 employees that
produces 1450 TPD on three paper machines. Also supervised
1200 TPD secondary fiber operation, and a 800 TPD virgin fiber
operation consisting of a Kamyr digester, four batch digesters, and a
200 TPD bleach plant.
Provided technical direction for$60 million rebuild of the mill's
largest machine to increase to 2500 FM on 42# kraft linerboard.
Provided the detailed operations design for $100 million capital
program to increase mill capacity to 2000 TPD.
Put together strategic plan for GCC Baltimore which Salomon
Brothers, Inc., used to help sell the mill.
Put together the process and operational design for combining
GCC's 700 TPD secondary fiber mill and LP's 700 TPD virgin
fiber mill which shared a fenceline into one mill that could be
eventually taken to a world -class mill with a 2000 TPD capacity.
Installed a fractionating system on GCC's 450 TPD Kamyr
system with shorts used as linerboard top stock.
t
t
I
I
I
a
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
1
THOMAS A. MEERSMAN
PAGE 2
12/90
Designed GCC's transfer system for virgin fiber, recycled OCC
(both shorts and longs), and the white water between two mills
now one.
Installed GCC's Rader chip thickness screening system to
process up to 2800 TPD of chips.
Designed major modifications to GCC's batch digesters,
including: capping valves, steam packing, new screens, new
rejects system, indirect heating and steam leveling with a new
DCS computer system.
Installed a new blow heat recovery and NCG system at GCC.
Designed modifications to GCC's recycled fiber plant to take it to
1500 TPD (from 800 TPD) of OCC making it the world's largest
OCC plant. Modifications included process control changes,
secondary pulpers, turbo separators, a secondary turbo separator,
white water modifications, pressure screens, four stage reject
tailing system, reverse flow cleaners, fiber fractionation, cooking
system, and high density storage for cooked long fiber.
Developed the process design for GCC's $60 million rebuild of
#4 paper machine to give it the capability to go to 2500 FPM on a
three ply fourdrinier linerboard sheet. Design changes included:
addition of a third stock system, new white water system, new
refining system, a two ply strataflow primary headbox, top stock
cleaning system, new vacuum systems, modified fourdrinier
table, a primary Belbond, a new secondary headbox, a secondary
Belbond, a suction pickup, a new 600 ply suction first press, an
ENP second press, major drive changes, rewinder and roll
handling rebuilds, and installation of DCS control system from
the HD storage through the dry end.
Put together a comprehensive DCS control system and the
training program for the operators on the major control changes.
Rebuilt table on GCC's #1 machine, added vacuum dewatering
and foils, removed FloVac, increased couch vacuum.
Rebuilt table on GCC's #3 machine, added vacuum dewatering
and foils.
Did an engineering study on what was needed to take GCC's #3
to a 800 TPD specialty board machine.
Participated in the study and design of plans to modernize GCC's
bleach plant to take it to a 500 TPD modern plant (current 150
TPD), minimizing the production of AOX and dioxin by
minimizing the use of chlorine.
I
I
I
I
1
1
t
t
1
1
I
t
1
t
I
1
1
t
1
THOMAS A. MEERSMAN
PAGE 3
12/90
Provided the on -site operational direction and process design for
the recycled fiber plant, pulp mill, and machine modifications in
GCC's $100 million modernization with FB &D and BE &K.
Manufacturing Manager, Riceboro Mill, Interstate Paper, Inc.
Responsible for production, maintenance, engineering, and technical
functions; and a three year $10 million capital plan to increase
production by 25% and produce specialty paperboard. Increased
mill production from 670 TPD to 730 TPD on brown grades and
from 570 TPD to 710 TPD on mottled white.
Made process design modifications and optimized Interstate's
recycled fiber plant to improve quality, increase capacity, and
allow to swing to white pulp subs for mottled white runs at IPC.
Designed major process changes in IPC pulp mill, including:
chip screening, hot stock refining, and hot stock pulp screening.
Made several fourdrinier table changes and vacuum system
modifications at IPC to take the machine to a top speed of 2100
FPM on 42# linerboard.
New Market Development, Betz Paperchem, Inc. Responsible for
identifying new markets, new products, and potential acquisitions.
Provided consulting services to mills using recycled fiber or
considering the use of recycled fiber, assisting in such areas as:
fiber procurement, pulping, cleaning, refining, deinking, wet end
operations, control of stickies, and product development. Also
developed new concepts and procedures for deinking and methods
to identify, remove or control potential sources of stickies.
Provided consulting services to optimize recycled fiber facilities
for Betz customers.
Did an in -depth market study on deinking technology.
Assisted in the development of pulper deinking technology and
the growth of that business.
Assisted in the development of products and a systems selling
approach to attack the problem of stickies in mills using recycled
fiber.
Presented a paper at several local TAPPI meetings on the factors
necessary to successfully utilize recycled fiber in mill operations.
President, Paperworks, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio. Operated a
marketing and paper distribution company. Developed innovative
marketing concepts around new products, inventory and price
control. Built business to $2 million gross sales /year with base of
business with Fortune 500 companies and government agencies.
THOMAS A. MEERSMAN
PAGE 4
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE: 21
12/90
General Manager, Newark Boxboard Group, Inc., Middletown,
Ohio. Responsible for operations and sales for 120 TPD secondary
fiber mill. Directed the modernization of mill resulting in increased
production and improved quality.
Cylinder machine wet end rebuild of machine, screens, forming
and press sections.
Beater room modernization, including: new pulper, new pressure
screens, new refiners, and fiber fractionation system. Presented
paper at 1976 TAPPI Secondary Fiber Conference on fiber
Fractionation.
Provided critique and engineering review for secondary fiber
pulping and cleaning systems for California and Wisconsin
Paperboard.
Served on BRDA's committees for stock preparation, pressing,
and chemical additives.
Worked with team for Newark Boxboard to evaluate potential
acquisitions providing a detailed analysis of stock preparation and
paper machine capabilities.
Production Manager, Mead Corporation, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio.
Major contributor for increased production of 33% on two speciality
recycled paperboard machines at the Cincinnati mill.
Mechanical roll quality study for coating base stock at Mead's
Chillicothe Mill..
Secondary fiber (OCC, News, Mixed) screening and cleaning
modernization.
Cylinder machine press section and vacuum system
modernization.
Presented a paper at local PIMA meeting on the successful use of
drainage aids for recycled fiber systems.
Fourdrinier table and vacuum system modifications.
MEMBERSHIPS: Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (TAPPI)
Paper Industry Management Association (PIMA)
Presented papers at national and local meetings for both TAPPI and
PIMA.
t
1
1
1
t
1
t
1
1
KEY PERSONNEL
DONALD L. FLISRAM
SENIOR ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT DESIGNER
EDUCATION:
CERTIFICATION:
EXPERIENCE:
CRS SIRRINE ENGINEERS, INC.
Oregon Polytechnic Institute; U.S. Army Electrical and Electronics
courses; various work related courses.
Certified Energy Auditor, State of Oregon.
Department Project Engineer, Menasha Corporation, Otsego,
Michigan. Responsible for the design of lighting, power, and
electrical distribution system for 300 TPD secondary fiber system
expansion and No. I paper machine rebuild.
Department Project Engineer, Armstrong World Industries, Inc., St.
Helens, Oregon. Mineral fiberboard manufacturing plant,
responsible for design of lighting, power and electrical distribution
system for entire fiberboard manufacturing facility.
Department Project Engineer, James River Corporation, Wauna,
Oregon. No. 3 paper machine rebuild, responsible for electrical
design associated with rebuild of existing paper machine.
Construction Inspector, Port of Portland, Portland, Oregon.
Portland International Airport terminal expansion, responsible for
electrical construction inspection and supervision of renovations to
the main terminal building and federal inspection station.
Project Designer, North Pacific Paper Corporation, Longview,
Washington. Bleach plant optimization, responsible for electrical
design and equipment procurement.
Project Designer, Weyerhaeuser Company, Springfield, Oregon.
No. 1 paper machine, system addition, responsible for complete
PLC control system design, including interface with existing PLC
systems.
Project Designer, Boise Cascade Corporation, Steilacoom,
Washington. Wet end reconfiguration of No. 3 paper machine,
responsible for electrical design, equipment procurement and
construction assistance to replace existing unit sub transformer, add
a D -C drive to the fan pump, replace existing headbox and add a top
wire former.
Project Designer, Boise Cascade Corporation, International Falls,
Minnesota. Boiler conversion and ash handling system, responsible
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
1
DONALD L. FLISRAM
PAGE 2
12/90
for electrical design, equipment procurement and construction
inspection of convert existing boiler to burn bark, install ash
handling system and precipitator.
Project Designer/Testing Crew Chief, City of Portland, Portland,
Oregon. Traffic signal control system study, responsible for field
testing and recommendations to upgrade existing cable system to
accommodate analog signaling associated with installation of a new
computer for the Central Business District.
Project Designer, Coca Cola Company, Portland, Oregon.
Ammonia facility and HFCS additions, responsible for design
specification and construction inspection of an ammonia facility and
expansion of high fructose corn syrup system, including PLC based
automated control system.
Project Designer, Port of Portland, Portland, Oregon. Portland
International Airport south runway strengthening, responsible for
design, specification and construction inspection for modification of
existing runway lights and 5 kV underground distribution system,
and installation of a computer controlled weather condition
anticipation system.
Construction Inspector, Port of Portland, Portland, Oregon.
Portland International Airport, taxiway "B" addition, responsible for
installation of new and modification of existing runway lights, 5 kV
underground distribution system and associated equipment.
Project Designer, Port of Seattle, Seattle, Washington. Dock
modernization, responsible for addition of a large storage area
including high mast lighting, ship connection facilities, an office
building and a dockside underground bus system for large DC
unloading cranes.
Project Designer, City of Seattle, Seattle, Washington. Westlake
Avenue extension, responsible for design of 5 kV underground
distribution system.
Construction Inspector, Port of Portland, Portland, Oregon.
Portland International Airport, north runway rehabilitation,
responsible for installation of new and modification of existing
runway lighting and 5 kV substation.
Project Designer, Weyerhaeuser Company, Klamath Falls, Oregon.
Log unloading and scaling yard, responsible for lighting a 25 -acre
rail unloading and log scaling yard, and modification of existing
electrical distribution system.
Project Designer, University of Oregon Medical School, Portland,
Oregon. Parking structure, responsible for design of lighting and
power distribution system for a four -level automobile parking
structure.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
1
t
City of Grangeville, Grangeville, Idaho, Wastewater
Treatment Plant and Irrigation Facility
I
I
1
1
1
DONALD L. FLISRAM
PAGE 3
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE: 24
12/90
Project Designer, State of Oregon. Stewart State Park, responsible
for design of underground power distribution system for state park
which included a ranger residence, picnic areas, camping loops for
recreational vehicles, and automated underground irrigations
systems.
Project Designer, Safeway, Inc., Clackamas, Oregon. Frozen
foods warehouse, responsible for electrical design and construction
inspection for a large frozen food warehouse.
Project Designer, responsible for design, specification and
construction inspection of power distribution, lighting, control,
telemetry and standby power generation system for the following
municipal water and waste water treatment plants and pumping
facilities:
Douglas County, Oregon, Winston -Green Wastewater
Treatment Plant
City of Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, Water Treatment Plant
Modifications
City of The Dalles, The Dalles, Oregon, Wastewater
Treatment Plant
Lincoln City, Oregon, Wastewater Treatment Plant and
Sewage Pump Stations
City of Oregon City,Oregon City, Oregon, Water Intake
Pump Station and Water Treatment Plant
Unified Sewage Agency, Washington County, Oregon,
Durham Wastewater Treatment Plant
Cowlitz County, Longview, Washington, Cowlitz County
Wastewater Treatment Plant
City of Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, Water Pump Station
City of Grandview, Grandview, Idaho, Irrigation Pump
Station
City of Portland, Portland, Oregon, Columbia Boulevard,
Wastewater Treatment Plant, Secondary Treatment Addition.
N
0
G
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WW1
i ll i iii i 1 1-
MS Sirrine Engineers, Inc.
Is A.ppfying For The
1991
Ff
I Malcolm ation
ality
rd
CR,SS supports the Malcofm Baldrige National Quality
.Award program. We invite our clients, suppliers and
_Mends to join us in a continuing Quality Improvement
Process to help ourselves —and our ration in the
quest for excedence.
THE YY
i ineREP RT
NOBODY KNOWS PULP PAPER LIKE SIRRINE®
Innovative. Value -Added Service
WINTER 1991
Improve And Maximize Your Process Economics
G
Advanced Process Management extends your operation's capabilities.
The Pulp and Paper
Division of CRS Sirrine
Engineers, Inc., has taken a
major step into the future
with the formation of the
Advanced Process Manage-
ment Group.
Significant improve-
ments in microelectronics
and software technology
over the past five years
have created the need for a
new type of engineering
service maximizing pro-
cess economics through an
integrated understanding of
process control technology,
process design principles
and process operation
practicalities.
With increased global
competition, every manu-
facturing operation must
apply the Total Quality
Philosophy of "continuous
improvement" to survive,
and this has created a spi-
raling demand for advanced
process management
(APMTM) services. It is un-
likely, however, that many
manufacturing organizations
will be able to obtain and
maintain the scope of resi-
dent expertise necessary to
effectively provide these
services. This situation has
created a significant opportu-
nity for Sirrine.
APM will include a full
range of services to meet
client needs:
analysis of process unit
operations,
identification of poten-
tial changes and associated
costs /benefits,
modification of process
design and operating proce-
dures,
design and implementa-
tion of supervisory control,
data acquisition and operator
decision support systems,
design integration and
turnkey APM project
IN THIS ISSUE
APMTM New Service
Statistical Process
Control
Southeast Paper Award
management.
Proprietary software pack-
ages also will be developed to
provide advanced process
management functions for
the process units that are
critical to the economics of a
particular process. Expected
return on investments (ROIs)
for our clients is over 300
These APM packages will
employ state -of- the -art pro-
cess management techniques,
such as model- reference
control, statistical process
With increased
global competition,
every manufacturing
operation must apply
the Total Quality
Philosophy of
"continuous
improvement" to
survive...
control, dynamic process
simulation, ergometrics and
artificial intelligence.
The Advanced Process
Management Group is di-
rected by Gerald Stephens.
During his 17 years of tech-
nology management experi-
ence, Gerry has directed the
development and implemen-
tation of various software
products and numerous
advanced process control and
data acquisition systems for
the paper, aerospace, petro-
leum, chemical, and electrical
power industries.
Operator Friendly SPC Improves Process Operations
By Gerry Stephens
Manager, Advanced Process
Management Group
The intimidating aspects
of statistics have generally
prevented effective integra-
tion of SPC (statistical process
control) into everyday process
operations. Economic ben-
efits in the range of $50,000
to $1,000,000 per year have
been realized through effec-
tive use of SPC on specific
process units. Despite this
level of economic success,
SPC's capabilities for support-
ing process operations have
been largely ignored because
of the stigma associated with
the word "statistical."
President's
Message
"The only constant is
change" is an adage that
aptly describes the pulp and
paper engineering business,
particularly as it relates to
ensuring that our clients
receive the most up -to -date,
value -added services avail-
able.
CRS Sirrine Engineers is
constantly adapting to
change, both to satisfy
client needs and to stay on
the cutting edge of technol-
ogy. Several years ago, we
began our series of Emerging
Technology seminars, which
we have continually modi-
fied to meet the shifting
demands of the pulp and
paper industry. The most
recent ET seminar focused
on the industry's hottest
issues recycling, deinking,
and pulp mill /bleach plant
improvements.
A new seminar has been
planned for the week of
April 29 on pulp and paper
power plants. Registration
information will be mailed
The Basic Concept
With modern control sys-
tems technology and some
common sense, the mathemati-
cal complexities of SPC can be
made transparent to process
operators, who are the people
best positioned to actually
optimize process operating
economics. With the statistics
"hidden," SPC provides the basis
for a very simple and effective
operating philosophy:
The critical process
variable(s) of any process unit
exhibit a usual level of variation.
This is true of process variables
which are either controlled or
uncontrolled in an automation
sense.
to you soon.
Moreover, our search for
new client services has led us
to the formation of two orga-
nizations that will help you
cope with change. The first is
our Process Consultants
Group, dedicated to providing
a variety of front -end mill
design services that research
shows will be in great demand
from now through the turn of
the century. The second is our
Advanced Process Manage-
ment Group, which is de-
scribed in the lead story of this
newsletter.
We believe that a continu-
ing series of seminars, the
Process Consultants Group
and the Advanced Process
Management Group are evi-
dence of our commitment to
change and to providing
clients innovative, value
added services that will help
them maintain a competitive
edge.
(9
C. David Bassett
President
CRS Sirrine Engineers, Inc.
This usual level of
process variation can be
quantified and monitored.
A significant change
from the usual level of pro-
cess variation indicates that
something abnormal is occur-
ring in the process.
Cause(s) of abnormal
process variation can be
"controlled" to maximize
process operating economics.
The touted economic
benefits of SPC are achieved
by managing process varia-
tion so that the resulting
product variation is signifi-
cantly less than the manufac-
turing specification tolerance.
Then, process setpoints are
shifted so that the most
economical limit of the
manufacturing specification is
approached, but not ex-
ceeded, by normal product
variation. This will be suc-
cessful only if abnormal
process variation can be
quickly recognized and man-
aged to minimize abnormal
product variation and /or off
spec production.
Operator Focus
The process operator is
generally in the best position
to quickly diagnose and
manage abnormal variation
in critical temperatures,
pressures, levels, flowrates,
and other process variables.
Although effective tech-
niques to identify and quan-
tify abnormal process varia-
tion have been available since
the 1930s, it has not been
practical to put them at the
disposal of process operators
until recently. Today, many
modern microcomputer -based
process controllers can quan-
tify the variation, establish its
normal level of variation, and
alert process operators when
abnormal variation occurs.
Many distributed digital
(See "SPC," Page 3)
r
Pulp And Paver Division
L
Robby
Compton has
been ap-
pointed Man-
ager of the
Pulp and Paper
jam' 4 Department
(the process
department for
the division). He is respon-
sible for staffing projects, and
for the technical supervision
and professional development
of the department's 60 em-
ployees.
Dennis Moss has been named
Manager of the
Piping Depart-
ment, which
includes a staff
of 75 engineers
and designers.
He is a 22 -year
veteran of the
company.
People On The Move
Compton
Moss
SPC (Continued From Page 2)
control systems can docu-
ment abnormal process
variation, generate a priori-
tized trouble- shooting check-
list, and provide the operator
access to historical process
data for pinpointing the
actual cause. Some of today's
control systems can even
guide the operator through
the actual trouble- shooting
process.
Getting Started
Most of the potential
economic benefits can be
achieved with a relatively
simple, operator- oriented SPC
program:
1. Identify the most
critical process variables for
each major process unit. The
list may include product
quality variables, process state
variables and equipment
performance variables.
2. Implement SPC calcu-
lations for each critical pro-
Curt Davis has
been named
Manager of the
Control Systems
Department and
is responsible for
all control sys-
tems design work
produced by the
Pulp and Paper Division.
Jake Gressette has been named
Vice President Project Manager
of the division. During his 35-
year career at Sirrine, he has
managed some of its most
significant mill design projects.
Currently, he is assigned to the
expansion of
Union Camp's
mill in Eastover,
South Carolina,
one of the largest
projects ever
undertaken by
the Pulp and
Paper Division.
Davis
Gressette
cess variable in the spare
memory of a digital process
controller.
3. Permit the controller to
collect data for 1 -3 months,
depending on the type of pro-
cess.
4. Document current pro-
cess economics.
5. Conduct an operator
orientation session.
6. Implement an on -line
SPC control chart and Pareto
display for each critical process
variable in spare CRT console
display pages.
7. After the initial data
collection period, integrate SPC
alarms for each critical process
variable into existing process
displays.
8. Aggressively determine
the cause of each SPC alarm and
enter it into the Pareto display.
9. Aggressively eliminate or
control the most costly 20% of
Rick Lambert
has been ap-
pointed Vice
President and
Manager of
Engineering. He
is responsible for
all design engi-
neering work
done by the division's process,
power, material handling,
control systems, electrical,
structural /architectural /civil,
piping, CADD and HVAC
departments.
Morris McColley has been
I promoted to
Assistant Man-
ager of the
Piping Depart-
ment. Among
his duties are
coordinating
McColley CADD activities
and assisting in
the administration of the
department's day -to -day activi-
ties.
Lambert
causes for abnormal process
variation.
10. Repeat steps 8 -9 until
the normal variation of the key
product quality variables is
roughly 35% of the manufac-
turing spec range.
11. Adjust process control
setpoints so that the most
economical limit of the manu-
facturing spec is approached.
12. Document the im-
provement in process econom-
ics.
Sirrine is committed to
bringing the advantages of
modern technology to your
operations. Our Advanced
Process Management Group
stands ready to help maximize
the operating economics of
your process. Operator
friendly SPC is one way to help
you get the most out of your
process operations.
Sirrine- Designed Mill Receives Award From
Power Magazine
Southeast Paper Manufac-
turing Company's newsprint
mill in Dublin, Georgia,
garnered one of six national
awards distributed annually
by Power magazine.
The award cited South-
east for "...simultaneous
combustion of coal and
deinking sludge in a fluidized
bed boiler and for applying
gas turbine -based cogenera-
tion in the pulp and paper
industry."
The decision to expand the
mill's output from 600 tons /day to
over 1300 tons /day called for a
dramatic increase in the mill's
thermal, electrical and sludge
disposal requirements. On -site
cogeneration was the attractive
alternative to purchasing power.
In addition, the new power plant
is helping solve Southeast's sludge
disposal problems.
A unique, combined -cycle power plant supplies process steam and
electricity to Southeast Paper's newsprint mill in Dublin, Georgia. Sirrine
provided engineering and construction services.
THESirrineREPORT
Post Office Box 5456
Greenville, South Carolina 29606
NOBODY KNOWS PULP PAPER LIKE SIRRINE®
The magazine of powor•goneration technology
en Gas Turbines steam Turbines, En ines
Pumps. Compressors, valves, Firing steam 4 Pollution Cannel
SPECIAL SECTIO
rn Also in t`is issueY
LLLJJJI({I�O~III�LJI(iILJ and technology
update
O OIJ in print
1990 IJ 1mE, f Q
Powerplant
Southeast Paper Manufacturing
Company was highlighted in
the October issue of Power
magazine.
The Sirrine Report is
published periodically by
the Pulp and Paper Division
of CRS Sirrine Engineers, Inc.
P.O. Box 5456
Greenville, SC 29606
For more information,
telephone Diane Odom
(803) 676 -6184
Pulp And Paper
CRS Sirrine has long served the pulp and paper
industry with the design of new mills, plant
expansions and modernization programs We
pioneered many of the designs now considered
industry standards In the last ten years alone, we
have completed more than 300 mill engineering
projects from grassroots mills to specific support
areas and machine design, including the largest
fine paper machine ever built
Our services begin with preliminary studies, in
which we have extensive, proven experience We
perform construction and manufacturing cost
estimates and site selection studies for pulp,
paper and paperboard production, including all
details of site location, environmental studies and
permitting, air modeling, plant layout, conceptual
designs with flow sheets, general arrangements,
equipment lists and specifications
CRS Sirrine brings more experience to pulp and
paper facility design than any other company in
the industry We can provide design for a complete
production facility, or for specialized portions of
the facility, determined by your individual needs
Our experience covers all areas of digesting
and washing, including continuous and batch
digesting, waste repulping and thermomechanical
pulping, and supplemental facilities for washing
and screening We also have considerable
experience in design for bleaching, chemical
handling, bleach chemical production, and pulp
washing and handling
Our engineers are widely recognized as leaders
in complete facility design for the installation
and support of the paper machine from refining,
cleaning and screening to all supplemental piping,
air handling and instrumentation control with
computer applications and support equipment
that ensure efficient production
Our design experience also includes
On- and off machine coaters and support
services for coating operations, and for
sheeters, roll wrappers and converters, plus
support facilities for converting and finishing
Chemical recovery and power generation for
improved efficiency
Process systems and facilities for evaporators,
causticizing, lime reburning, tall oil and
turpentine extraction, and for chemical
handling and storage
Complete power plants utilizing fossil fuels,
bark, black liquor and other combustibles
for chemical recovery and steam generation,
and electrical power generation with complete
distribution and power control systems in new
facilities, modernizations and expansions
CRS Shrine also provides a full range of design
services for auxiliary facilities for raw material and
finished product storage and warehousing, water
and wastewater treatment, woodyards, lumber
and plywood production, shops and stores
CRS Sirrine Engineers, Inc.
P O Box 5210
Portland, OR 97208 -5210
(503) 624
Other Offices In Greenville, SC, Raleigh, NC,
Richmond. VA, Rochester, NY, And Savannah, GA
CRS Sirrine Mission Statement
CRS Sirrine has a long history of dedication to quality, openness
and teamwork. Our primary goal is service and commitment to
the client. We believe in quality products— getting it right the
first time. We believe in quality people —our employees are our
greatest resource. We believe in responsibility —to the needs of
our clients, and to the investment of our shareholders. CRS Sirrine
is dedicated to growth, both quantitative and qualitative. We are
a future looking company with a commitment to research and
technology on a global basis.
CRS Sirrine is a design /construct company providing comprehensive services
in architecture, engineering, construction, program management, and project
financing. We are a diversified company with a common purpose, shared
values, and a singular dedication to client service. We are a design firm on the
leading edge of innovation. We are a construction firm building and financing
projects. We are a management firm providing program management,
construction management, and management consulting services to hundreds
of clients.
Our business is service, and we are capital project problem solvers. We provide
total delivery capability from facility programming through design, engineering,
procurement, construction, and financing. We have the depth and resources
to service a broad range of projects. Flexibility and responsiveness are our
hallmarks. We are a company delivering quality projects on time and within
budget. We are developers and users of the latest technology—in design, in
engineering, in construction, and in communication and information systems.
Our business is ideas and implementation, and we are striving to be the best
in our field.
AC Adjustable Speed Drives
I Applications that lower your
operating cost
Voltage Source
Replace This
Flow
t
CRS Shrine Engineers, Inc has been helping
clients reduce their operating costs through the
application of AC adjustable speed drives
(ASDs) In many cases proper selection of
ASDs has resulted in 30 to 60 percent lower
operating costs per drive
Sirrine has worked with the Electric Power
Research Institute for the past decade in its pro-
gram that reviewed ASD retrofit applications in
industrial and commercial facilities The pro-
gram consisted of application preliminary
screening, economic evaluation, installation
design, data recording, knowledge transfer,
and educational seminars
What function does an ASD perform? Simply
stated, an ASD permits matching the motor
speed and speed of the driven equipment to
the process requirements
The previous method of controlling process fluid
or air flow has centered on the use of control
valves or dampers to throttle the fluid or air flow
to satisfy the process requirements With this
method, the power requirement differentials are
small When the process flow is reduced, the
head remains relatively constant due to the
throttling of the valve or damper In effect, the
horsepower not required by the process is
dropped across the valve or damper
With This
Voltage Source
FIC FE
M
Flow
t
The alternative to controlling the process flow
with valves or dampers Is to use an ASD, which
replaces the valve or damper and adjusts the
speed of the motor to match the flow require-
ments of the process
The first step in considering an ASD retrofit is
the preliminary screening of possible applica-
tions This involves constructing an annual load
duty cycle that compares load against time A
viable candidate has a large number of annual
operating hours, medium to large motor HP,
and a high degree of throttling for a large
percentage of the annual operating hours
Sirrine can perform the preliminary screening or
train your engineers in the screening process,
select the most attractive candidates, perform
the economic evaluation, recommend the best
drive configuration for your applications,
provide the design engineering, and assist with
commissioning and start -up of the equipment
ASDs have a wide range of applications They
can be used to
Save energy, improve process control, and
reduce maintenance costs in the food,
paper, automobile and consumer goods
Industries
Regulate pumping in municipal water
supply systems and in the chemical and oil
refining industries
Control fans, blowers and pumps in the
pulp and paper industries
Control air and water flow in industrial and
commercial HVAC systems
Regulate speed of boiler feed pumps and
fans in industrial and electric utility opera-
tions
WPM
CRS Sirrine Engineers, Inc.
P O Box 5210
Portland, OR 97208 -5210
(503) 624-3000
Other Offices In Greenville, SC. Raleigh, NC
Richmond VA, Rochester, NY, And Savannah GA
Offices In Principal Cities Across The United States