HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.268 Original ContractFiled at the Request of:
City of Port Angeles
City Clerk's Office
P. O. Box 1150
Port Angeles, WA 98362
I, I
2005 1164648 Coaunty
Interlocal Agreement
City Clerk File No.: 5
Agreement between the City of Port Angeles and (Cm ee
Purpose: CNA-AI/LOLA( plamL4,x t G(4
Dated:
€H.ED FOR rE, r F
:E.CO D
U
2005 SEP -9 AN 9: 34
AGREEMENT FOR PROCESS AND FRAMEWORK
FOR ADOPTION
OF A COUNTY -WIDE PLANNING POLICY
WHEREAS, Section 2 of Reengrossed Substitute House Bill 1025 (hereinafter referred
to as (HB1025) requires that the process and framework for adoption of a county-wide planning
policy be agreed upon by the City and County governments of Clallam County by October 1,
1991; and
WHEREAS, representatives of the City and County governments of Clallam County have
met as required by Section 2 of HB 1025 to establish a collaborative process that will provide
a framework for the adoption of a county -wide planning policy;
IT IS HEREBY AGREED, by the City of Port Angeles, that the process and framework
for adoption of a county-wide planning policy shall consist of a growth Management Steering
Committee (hereinafter referred to as GMSC) subject to the following terms and conditions:
1) Composition. The GMSC shall be composed of two representatives from each of the
governments of Clallam County, the city of Port Angeles, the City of Sequim and the City of
Forks. Representatives may be elected government officials, government staff or anyone else
from each of said political subdivisions. Representatives may change from meeting to meeting.
2) Facilitator. The GMSC facilitator shall continue to alternate every six months between
Clallam County and the City of Port Angeles as has been practiced in the ad hoc City/County
GMA Task Force.
3) Decision Making. GMSC decisions shall be advisory and shall be based upon consensus.
GMSC decisions shall be final upon ratification by the governments represented in the GMSC.
4) Mandate. The GMSC, subject to ratification as specified in paragraph 3 herein, shall
determine the procedures and provisions necessary for the adoption of a county-wide planning
policy. These procedures and provisions shall include but not be limited to desired planning
policies, deadlines, ratification of final agreements and demonstration thereof, and financing, if
any, of all activities associated therewith.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council
held on the 17tbday of September 1991.
d e' ',.0",,cry4tR
5 a L-Pg
Urban Growth Area Designations
1. Agreed upon population forecast and distribution by geographic subareas.
2. Agreed upon process to designate urban growth areas.
3. Agreed upon policies /principles to designate urban growth areas.
4. Agreed upon process to amend urban growth area designations.
Continuous and Orderly Develooment
1. Agreed upon service provisions within designated urban growth areas.
2. Agreed upon service provisions outside designated urban growth areas.
3. Definition of special purpose district role in the provision of services inside and outside of
urban growth areas.
4. An agreed upon process to establish consistent and coordinated service level standards for
public facilities within geographic planning area and urban growth area. Process should
also establish how "concurrency" would be addressed from one jurisdiction to another.
5. Policies to prohibit or discourage "leap- frog" development inside urban growth areas.
6. Policies regarding annexation and phasing of development.
7. Agreed upon policies or process for consistent development standards within urban growth
areas.
8. Agreed upon policies or process regarding land division and land use review within urban
growth areas and geographic planning areas.
Siting of Public Capital Facilities
ATTACHMENT B
COUNTY -WIDE PLANNING POLICY
DESIRED PLANNING POLICIES
1. Agreed upon process for identifying which public capital facilities are of a county-wide or
state -wide nature.
2. Agreed upon process for scheduling and distribution of facilities,including within urban
growth areas.
3. Agreed upon policies for location and size, environmental and design standards of public
capital facilities.
CWPP, Planning Policies
Page 2
County -wide Transportation Facilities and Strategies
1. Agreed upon process for adoption of transportation policies and strategies, including the
role and linkage with the Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization.
2. Agreed upon policies for the improvement of state highway system.
3. Agreed upon policies for the linkage and improvement of transit and non vehicular
transportation in the regional transportation network.
4. Agreed upon process for insuring consistency and coordination of level -of- service
designations.
Affordable Housing
1. Policies to encourage affordable housing opportunities through land use regulations.
2. Agreed upon strategies for encouragement and development of affordable housing.
3. Policies to ensure a fair share distribution of affordable housing in Clallam County.
4. Policies to address compensation for displacement of affordable housing with new
development
Joint County and City Planning in Urban Growth Areas
1. Policies to encourage consistent development standards within the urban growth area.
2. Agreed upon process for joint public facility planning.
3. Agreed upon process for financing public facilities within urban growth area.
4. Agreed upon policies for public infrastructure transition in urban growth areas.
5. Agreed upon process for intergovernmental coordination and communication of
development projects within urban growth areas.
6. Agreed upon process for adoption and amendment of coordinated and consistent plans
within urban growth areas.
County -wide Economic Development and Employment
1. Policies that consider the need for economic diversification and employment.
2. Policies that consider the county-wide linkages in economic development and employment,
such as tourism, conventions, promotion and marketing, transportation, diversified
manufacturing, retirement, forest products and infrastructure needs, etc.
3. Policies that address need for sites for economic development, particularly suitable land for
commercial and industrial development.
4. Agreed upon process for siting, coordination and consistency of economic development
plan implementation.
CWPP, Planning Policies
Page 3
Fiscal Imoact Analysis
1. Policies that consider service transfer as areas become annexed.
2. Policies that consider revenue transfer as areas become annexed.
3. Policies that consider phased annexation within urban growth areas.
Onen Space Corridors
1. Agreed upon policies or process to identify open space corridors within and between urban
growth areas useful for recreation.
2. Agreed upon policies or process to identify open space corridors within and between urban
growth areas useful for wildlife habitat.
3. Agreed upon policies or process to identify open space corridors within and between urban
growth areas useful for trails.
4. Agreed upon policies or process to identify open space corridors within and between urban
growth areas useful for connection of critical areas.
BEFORE THE BOARD OF CLALLAM COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, STATE OF WASHINGTON
In the Matter of
Amendment of Resolution
No. 247, 1991 Regarding
County -wide Planning Policy
Ratification Process and
Desired Planning Policies
RESOLUTION NO. s,QL 1991
THE BOARD OF CLALLAM COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, Section 2 of Reengrossed Substitute House Bill 1025 (hereinafter referred to as HB
1025) requires that the process and framework for adoption of a county -wide planning policy be agreed
upon by the City and County governments by October 1, 1991;
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners passed Resolution No. 247, 1991 agreeing to a process
and framework for Adoption of the County -wide Planning Policy;
WHEREAS, the City governments adopted similar resolutions for a process and framework; and
WHEREAS, the County and Cities wish to amend these agreements to establish ratification
procedures and define desired planning policy areas for completion and adoption of the County -wide
Planning Policy.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ABOVE FINDINGS, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE Board of Clallam
County Commissioners that the ratification process for decisions made under the AGREEMENT FOR
PROCESS AND FRAMEWORK FOR ADOPTION OF COUNTY -WIDE PLANNING POLICY and the desired
planning policy areas of the county -wide planning policy shall be subject to the following terms and
conditions:
SECTION 1. RATIFICATION PROCESS AND PROCEDURE
1.1. General Ratification Process. The GMSC shall submit proposed county -wide planning
policies, as identified in the Growth Management Act, for acceptance or rejection to the
legislative bodies represented in the GMSC. The GMSC may also submit the planning
policies for acceptance or rejection to any other organizations the GMSC determines
should participate. Upon the receipt of all of the determinations of acceptance or
rejection, the GMSC shall then make any necessary revisions to the planning policies to
best accommodate the concerns raised in the determinations. After all revisions have
been made, the GMSC shall submit the planning policies to the legislative bodies
represented in the GMSC for ratification. The GMSC may submit planning policies for
acceptance or ratification all at once or in sets of one or more. All of the planning policies
required under the Growth Management Act must be submitted for ratification to the
legislative bodies represented in the GMSC fourteen days or more before they are required
to be adopted under the Growth Management Act. Attachment A outlines the conceptual
model for this process.
1.2 Determination of Approval. An acceptance of a proposed county -wide planning
policy as identified in paragraph 1.1 herein signifies that a legislative body or participating
organization has determined that a planning policy is acceptable for ratification. If a
legislative body or participating organization accepts a planning policy, it may submit
recommendations to the GMSC to consider for revision. If a legislative body or
participating organization rejects a proposed planning policy, it shall inform the GMSC of
what changes are necessary for ratification.
1.3 Public Hearinas. Each GMSC member and participating organization shall be
solely responsible for conducting its own public hearings and may use any hearing
process it deems sufficient for acceptance and ratification of the proposed county -wide
planning policies.
5 c7CWV
1) -D5 -6i I
Resolution No. 1991
Page 2
ATTEST:
Ka en Flores
Clerk of the Board
SECTION 2. DESIRED PLANNING POLICY AREAS
2.1. General Desired Plannina Policy Areas. The desired planning policy areas which will be
addressed in the county -wide planning policy will include the following areas: policies to
implement designation of urban growth areas; policies for promotion of contiguous and
orderly development and provision of urban services to such development; policies for
siting public capital facilities of a county -wide or state -wide nature; policies for county -wide
transportation facilities and strategies; policies that consider the need for affordable
housing; policies for joint county and city planning within urban growth areas; policies for
county -wide economic development and employment; an analysis of the fiscal impact;
policies to identify open space corridors within and between urban growth areas.
2.2. Desired Plannina Policies. Desired planning policies within the policy areas identified
in Section 2.1 are attached to this agreement as Attachment B.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS .54; day of _I 1991.
BOARD OF CLALLAM COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
orothy Dungiin, Chair
Dave Cameron
rence Gaydeski
IN THE MATTER OF:
Agreement for Process and
Framework for Adoption of a
County -Wide Planning Policy
BEFORE THE BOARD OF CLALLAM COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
THE BOARD OF CLALLAM COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
,1991
WHEREAS, Section 2 of Reengrossed Substitute House Bill 1025 (hereinafter referred to as
HB1025) requires that the process and framework for adoption of a county -wide planning policy be agreed
upon by the City and County governments of Clallam County by October 1, 1991; and
WHEREAS, representatives of the City and County governments of Clallam County have met as
required by Section 2 of HB1025 to establish a collaborative process that will provide a framework for the
adoption of a county -wide planning policy;
IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Clallam County Board of Commissioners; that the process and
framework for adoption of a county -wide planning policy shall consist of a Growth Management Steering
Committee (hereinafter referred to as GMSC) subject to the following terms and conditions:
1. Composition. The GMSC shall be composed of two representatives from each of the governments
of Clallam County, the City of Port Angeles, the City of Sequim, and the City of Forks.
Representatives may be elected government officials, government staff or anyone else from each
of said political subdivisions. Representatives may change from meeting to meeting.
2. Facilitator. The GMSC facilitator shall continue to alternate every six months between Clallam
County and the City of Port Angeles, as has been practiced in the ad hoc City /County GMA Task
Force.
3. Decision Makina GMSC decisions shall be advisory and shall be based upon consensus. GMSC
decisions shall be final upon ratification by the governments represented in the GMSC.
4. Mandate. The GMSC, subject to ratification as specified in paragraph 3 herein, shall determine the
procedures and provisions necessary for the adoption of a county -wide planning policy. These
procedures and provisions shall include but not be limited to desired planning policies, deadlines,
ratification of final agreements and demonstration thereof, and financing, if any, of all activities
associated therewith.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS W I) day of SQ p y ,,Qj. 1 1991.
BOARD OF CLALLAM COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST:
A n Hares
Clerk of the Board
Dorothy Dunc Chair
Dave Cameron
Lawrence Gaydeski
CC Corn rnu.n;4 -1 Lieu PI v pn'Hky
,ass
9,/D-11
GROG ENT
NAGEM
SAL CONSENSUS STEERING
PROP
CO MMITTEE
MENT A POLICY PLAINJ
NTT ASH O j �rrctV l�� i
F� FOR T
PROCED RATII�ArT`10 STATE DCD
STATE DCD (SEEK ADVICE)
(SEEK ADVICE)
ST ATE DCD
(SEEK ADVICE)
NO CONSENSUS
COUNTY
CON C ITY OR
OTHER
AGENCY
(PUBLIC
H EARINGS)
NO CONSENS
GROWTH NT
SENSiJ NAGEi s
STEERIN
COMMITT
COUNTY REJECTS
COUNTY CITY
CONS OR OVER
ENSUS AGENCY
(PUBLIC HEARINGS)
COUNTY RATIFIES AND
CITY(S) SECT
A DOPT
CONSENS POLIC
GROWTH
MANAGEME
REGIONA
HEA RINGS
BOARD