HomeMy WebLinkAbout2148ORDINANCE NO. a7/S/4'
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles
amending Ordinance No. 1709, specifically
the Zoning Map of the City of Port Angeles,
designating all RB Zoning Districts as
OC Zoning Districts.
WHEREAS, the necessary public hearings have been held;
and
WHEREAS, the requirements of Chapter 35A.63 RCW and Chap
ter 43.21C RCW have been met and a public hearing has been held by
the City Council following public notice; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2109 amended Ordinance No. 1709
by replacing the text of the Residential Buffer (RB) Zoning Dis-
trict with a new text designated as the Office Commercial (OC)
Zoning District; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to eliminate all references to
the replaced RB Zoning District on the Zoning Map of Ordinance No.
1709; and
WHEREAS, such change would be in the best interests of
the community; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT
ANGELES as follows:
Section 1. Any property designated RB on the Zoning Map
of Ordinance No. 1709, as amended, is hereby designated OC (Office
Commercial).
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be effective five (5)
days after publication.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles
at a regular meeting of the Council held on the 2nd day of June,
1981.
'4-10‘4,44‘44e4
ATTEST: M A Y R
41, acie_42Z
Marian C. Parrish, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
raig Miller, City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
•
MEMORANDUM
May 27, 1981
TO: City Council
FROM: Planning Departm
RE: Zoning Map revision -- Office Commercial District
„, ,4„,,.,,
In November, 1980, the City replaced the Residential Buffer District
of the Zoning Ordinance with the new Office Commercial District (Or-
dinance No. 2109).. At that time, no change was made in the Zoning
Map.
Consequently, it is possible for a property owner to still develop
under the RB requirements, even though that was not the City's in-
tension. Therefore, an Ordinance correcting this oversight is at-
tached.
Public hearings have been posted. Because the matter is a technical
correction, it has not been referred to the Planning Commission, in
the interests of time and reduction of workloads.
(Following the public hearing, a simple motion to approve should
be sufficient, because the Ordinance contains the reasons for
its adoption.)