Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2220ORDINANCE NO. 02.2c,70 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles providing penalties for certain crimes, and amending Section 9.01.070 of Ordinance 2129 and the Port Angeles Municipal Code, and Section 12 of Ordinance 2188 and Section 9.16.900 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, as follows: Section 1. Section 9.01.070 of Ordinance No. 2129 and the Port Angeles Municipal Code are each hereby amended to read as follows: 9.01.070 Classes of crimes. An offense defined by this title constitutes a misdemeanor of the first class or a misdemeanor of the second class. A Class I misdemeanor may be punished by either fine or imprisonment, or both, up to the maximum sentence allowed under the jurisdiction of the court in which the charge is filed. A Class II misdemeanor may be punished by a maximum fine of One Thousand ($1,000) Dollars. A sentence of imprisonment shall not be imposed for any Class II misdemeanor. Section 2. Section 12 of Ordinance No. 2188 and Section 9.16.900 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code are each hereby amended to read as follows: 9.16.900 Classification of Crimes. Any person convicted of violating Sections 9.16.090, 9.16.110, 9.16.130, 9.16.160, or 9.16.170 of this chapter shall be guilty of a Class I misdemeanor, and sentenced accordingly, where: (1) The value of the property, services or checks forming the basis of the charge is equal to or greater than One Hundred ($100) Dollars; or (2) The person charged has been convicted or forfeited bail, within five (5) years of the date of the incident or incidents forming the basis of the charge, of two or more previous crimes of theft, possessidh of stolen property, unlawful issuance of bank checks, or any kind of fraud under any city, county, state or federal law. (3) All other violations of Sections 9.16.090, 9.16.110, 9.16.130, 9.16.160, or 9.16.170 shall be Class II misdemeanors and sentenced accordingly; provided that the court shall impose a minimum fine of Five Hundred ($500) Dollars. Of the fine imposed, at least Fifty ($50) Dollars shall not be suspended or deferred where the conviction is the first such conviction within any twelve -month period. Upon conviction for a second offence within any twelve -month period of a crime of theft, possession of stolen property, unlawful issuance of bank checks, or any kind of fraud under any city, county, state or federal law, the court may suspend or defer only that portion of the fine which is in excess of Five Hundred ($500) Dollars. • Section 3. If any provision of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected, and to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the /5 day of 1982. ATTEST: �J Marian C. Parrish, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Craig . Miller, City Attorney PUBLISHED : 'lam"" n qi�) /9 ?2- MEMORANDUM June 11, 1982 TO: City Council FROM: City Attorney RE: Amendment to Criminal Code / "Bad Checks" The attached Ordinance amends the City's Criminal Code in two respects, each of which is designed to bring the Criminal Code into conformance with a recently enacted amendment to the State bad check law, by Chapter 138 of the Laws of the 1982 Regular Session. This Ordinance increases the maximum fine for such offenses to $1,000, from the previous $500. Secondly, it requires that, on a first conviction within one year of a theft related crime, the court must impose a fine of $500, and may suspend only $450 of that. Upon a second offense, the court must impose a minimum fine of $500, and may not suspend any portion of that fine. This is substantially more strict than the present Ordinance, which allows suspension of all of the fine, if the court so desires. These changes are necessary, to bring the City's Criminal Code into conformance with the recent amendment to the State Statute, and their adoption is recommended. Craig L. M)1ler City Att ney