HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07/14/1999
.
.
.
FORTANGELES
WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMlSSION
321 East Fifth Street
July 14, 1999
I.
CALL TO ORDER
7 p.m.
II. ROLLCALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Meeting ofJune 9,1999.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1.
SHORELINE SU.B.8T ANTIAL DEVELO.FMENT PERMIT - S.MAj)~
DAISHOW A AMERlCA,1-2.02Marine-Dme; Request for a permit to allow the
construction of an equipment storage building in a shoreline area in the Industrial
Heavy zone. The use is in conjunction with the Daishowa America mill operation.
2. SHORELINE SUBST ANTIALUEYELOPMENT PERMIT - SMA 99-07 -
PENINSULA DAILY NEWS,3ill--.We.st.Er.onLS1ree1: Request for a permit to
allow the demolition of a 7,700+ warehouse in the shoreline area in the
Commercial Arterial zone. The demolition is part of a project that will result in
the construction ofa 4,375 square foot new warehouse structure on the property.
The new warehouse structure is not within the shoreline.
3.. illl"IDITIONAL UBEBRMIT - CUP 99-10-=..SflUNI, 131East FirstS1re.et
Request for a pennit to allow a series of panel antennas to be mounted on the top
of a structure in the Central Business District for telecommunication enhancement.
The antennas will be flush mounted and will not extend higher than the existing
structure.
V. OTHER BUSINESS
Consideration of final approval of a binding site improvement plan for the
Port of Port Angeles Industrial Park.
PLANNING COMMISSION: Mary Craver (Chair), Fred Hewins (Vice),Bob King, Linda Nutter,Dean Reed,Fred Norton, Jason Robotkay
PLANNING STAFF: Brad Collins (Planning Director), David Sawyer (Senior Planner), Sue Roberds (Planning Specialist)
.
.
.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
STAFF REPORTS
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
ADJOURNMENT
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS; Mary Craver (Chair);Fred Hewins(Vice);Bob King,Linda Nutter,Dean Reed,Fred Norton,Jason Robotkay
PLANNING STAFF; Brad Collins, Planning Director; David Sawyer, Senior Planner; Sue Roberds, Planning Specialist.
.
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
July 14, 1999
7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Fred Hewins, Fred Norton, Jason Robotkay,
Bob King, Linda Nutter
Members Excused:
Mary Craver, Dean Reed
Staff Present:
David Sawyer, Sue Roberds
Public Present:
Tim McFadden, Bill Rinehart, Bill Dawson, Paul Perlwitz
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner King moved to approve the June 9, 1999, meeting minutes as presented. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Nutter and passed 5 - O.
. PUBLIC HEARINGS
At the request of an out of town applicant, Vice Chair Hewins reordered the agenda.
CDM>ITIONAL U.8E PERMIT - CUP 99-10 - SPRINT, 131 East First
Skeet Request for a permit to allow a series of panel antennas to be mounted
on the top of a structure in the Central Business District for
telecommunication enhancement. The antennas will be flush mounted and
will not extend higher than the existing structure.
Planning Specialist Sue Roberds reviewed the Planning Department's staff report
recommending approval of the conditional use permit as proposed. Vice Chair Hewins
opened the public hearing.
Tim McFadden, P.O. Box 1321, Issaquah, WA, represented the applicant. He concurred
with staffs analysis and recommendation. The proposed site is one of five sites being
proposed to enhance telecommunication service in the Clallam County area. He corrected
information contained in the report stating that the antennas are 4' x 12" x 10" wide attached
to brackets, which is standard in the industry.
There being no further testimony, Vice Chair Hewins closed the public hearing.
.
Following discussion regarding mounting of the brackets, Commissioner Nutter moved to
approve the conditional use permit with the following condition, citing the following
findings and conclusions:
Planning Commission Minutes
July 14, /999
Pagel
.
Condition:
1. Plans shall be approved by the Fire Department to ensure that installation does not
interfere with ingress or egress. No additional structures resulting in an increase in
square footage to the building shall be added without approval of the Fire
Department.
Findings;
The following findings are based on infonnation provided in the July 14, 1999, staff report
for CUP 99-10, including all of its attachments. Consideration was also given to the
comments and information presented during the July 14, 1999 public hearing, and the
Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation. Consequently, the City of Port Angeles
Planning Commission hereby finds:
1. The applicant, Sprint PCS, applied for a conditional use permit to allow the
placement of panel antennas, approximately 4' x 12" x 10", on an existing elevator
room located on the roof of a building located in the Central Business District on
May 28, 1999 (Attachment A).
2.
The proposed structure is identified as the Naval Lodge Elks Building, located at 131
East First Street, and has been listed on the National Historic Register since May,
1986. Comment on behalf of the State Historic Preservation Officer is required under
Section 106 of the National Historic preservation Act of 1966 because the proposal
requires a license or permit from the Federal Communications Commission.
.
3. The City received a letter from the State Department of Community, Trade and
Economic Development Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in response
to notification sent by the Planning Department of the proposal. The letter states that
the proposal appears to meet the Secretary of the Interior's standards for
rehabilitation and would therefore constitute no adverse effect under Federal
(Historic) Register provisions.
4. Reviewing City Departments had no comment other than the Fire Department will
require review and approval of plans, and no additions to the structure shall be made.
5. The Naval Lodge Elks Building is 65' tall and contains an elevator room structure at
its tallest point. The proposal will result in the flush mounting of three brackets (4'x
12" x 10" each) containing three antennas per bracket on three sides of the elevator
structure. Two of the brackets are intended for immediate use while one is reserve.
Seven equipment cabinets will be located in an equipment room located on the fifth
floor of the building.
6.
An employee will monitor the site approximately once a month. No on-site
employees are required and no regular maintenance is anticipated.
.
7.
Chapter 17.24 ( CBD Zone) ofthe City of Port Angeles Municipal Code allows for
"J. Utility buildings and structures" by conditional use permit in the Central
Business District.
~,
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 14.1999
Page 3
8.
Public notification was provided through publication in the legal section of the
~eninsulanaily~ on June 17,1999, and through mailing to 40 property owners
within 300 feet on June 15, 1999. No comments were received.
9. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has the overall responsibility for
regulating the telecommunication industry. Pursuant to the Telecommunications Act
of 1966 there are specific limitations on local regulatory actions oflocal governments
when dealing with personal wireless services The role of local governments is to
plan and regulate the location, height, setbacks, and other building and safety
standards within the limitations of the Act.
10. The area is zoned Commercial on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
11. The Naval Lodge Elks Building contains two antennas, one for GPS and one for
OMNI use, that exceed the height of the elevator structure mounted on the roof.
12. There will be no need to light the proposed apparatus.
13. :rhe Planning Commission decision is final unless appealed within 14 days to the
City Council.
14.
Wireless communication facilities are exempt from the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEP A) regulations under WAC 173-11-800(27). A Categorically Exemption
was issued for the project on July 8, 1999.
Conclusions.:
The following conclusions are based on the infonnation provided in the July 14,
1999 Staff Report for CUP 99-10, including all of its attachments. Consideration
was also given to the comments and infonnation presented during theJuly 14, 1999
public hearing, the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the
above listed findings. Consequently, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission
hereby concludes:
A. The proposal as conditioned is in the public interest.
B. The proposal is in compliance with the City's Municipal Code (Zoning) and
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
C. The proposal will not result in an increase in the need for parking for the Naval
Lodge Elks Building.
D. The City's SEPA requirements have been fulfilled.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Robotkay and passed 5 - O.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 14. 1999
Page"
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - SMA 9~
O.6~W A AMERICA, 19m Marine D..riYe; Request for a permit to
allow the construction of an equipment storage building in a shoreline area
in the Industrial Heavy zone. The use is in conjunction with the Daishowa
America mill operation.
Planner Sawyer reviewed the Planning Department's staffreport recommending approval
of the proposed shoreline permit. Vice Chair Hewins opened the public hearing.
Paul Perlwitz, Daishowa America, 1902 Mari1le Drive, stated agreement with the staffs
analysis and recommendation. As in the past, Daishowa America will have an archaeologist
on site for the excavation portion of the activity. The proposed structure is a garage type of
use to house equipment used for testing and storage purposes. Footings will be
approximately 181t deep.
Commissioner Robotkay asked Mr. Sawyer to define best management practices. Mr.
Sawyer responded that construction teclmiques observed will follow the Puget Sound Water
Quality Manual dictates which contain a series of common sense construction management
procedures. Those procedures provide guidelines specific to how runoff from the site shall
be handled, that disturbed soils will be matted down with specific materials, and how
eventual drainage shall be contained andlor treated.
There being no further comments, Vice Chair Hewins closed the public hearing.
Commissioner King moved to approve the shoreline substantial development permit
as proposed with the following conditions, and citing tbe following findings and
conclusions:
Conditions:
1. lfthe subject site has not been previously inventoried, evaluated, and reviewed to the
satisfaction of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the subject site shall be evaluated by
a cultural review team which shall include a professional archaeologist, a
representative of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the site owner, and the City
Planning Department. This team shall determine the extent of excavation monitoring
for the project during the permit review process. As an alternative, the applicant may
volunteer to have an approved archaeologist on site during any excavation in lieu of
a review by the aforementioned cultural team. If during an excavation that by
decision of the cultural review team occurs without an approved archaeologist on-
site, any phenomena of possible archaeological interest are uncovered, the developer
shall stop such work and provide for a site inspection and evaluation by a
professional archaeologist to ensure that all possible valuable archaeological data is
properly salvaged.
2.
The project shall comply with all regulations of the City's Shoreline Master Program
specifically those of Chapters 4,5,6 and 7.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minlltcs
Jllly l4. 1999
PageS
,
the City's Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protection Area Ordinance.
4.
The project shall utilize best management practices as identified in the City of Port
Angeles Stormwater Management Plan to control stormwater runoff into the
shoreline area.
5.
Construction pursuant to this shoreline substantial development permit shall not
begin until 21 days from the "date of filing" as defined in RCW 90.58.140.
Endings:
Based on the information provided in the July 14, 1999, staff report for SMA 99-06
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port
Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
I. The applicant, Daishowa America Co., Ltd. applied for a Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit on April 27, 1999 and the application was determined complete
on May 16, 1999 (Please see the July 14, 1999 Staff Report for SMA 99-06).
2.
The proposed application is for a shoreline substantial development permit to build
a new 22' x 24', 16' high building in the Chip Handling Yard, northwest of the
existing Recycled Paper Plant building. The purpose of the new building will be to
house equipment and materials.
3. A Determination of Non-Significance (#864) was issued by the City of Port Angeles
SEP A Responsible Official for the proposal on July 6, 1999.
4. The application and hearing process was advertised in accordance with the legal
requirements ofthe City of Port Angeles and the State of Washington.
5. The Port Angeles Shoreline Master Program, Comprehensive Plan, Zoning
Ordinance and critical areas ordinances have been reviewed with respect to this
application.
6. The site is designated Industrial in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Industrial-Heavy
in the City's Zoning Ordinance, and Urban-Harbor in the City's Shoreline Master
Program.
7. Chapter 5 of the City's Shoreline Master Program indicates a water-related industrial
use, such as a pulp and paper mill, is a permitted use in the U-H designation.
8.
Public access to the shoreline is provided through this industrial site by way of the
City's waterfront trail which runs along Marine Drive.
9. The construction of the proposed building will not impact the use of Marine Drive
or the City's water front trail.
.
.
.
Plallning Commission Minutes
July /4, 1999
Page 6
10. The proposed building will serve the existing pulp and paper mill facility.
11. Structures housing water-related uses are required to setback 10' from the shoreline.
The proposed structure is located 50' from the shoreline at this location.
Conclusions:
Based on information provided in the July 14, 1999 Staff Report for SMA 99-06 including
all of its attachments, comments and information presented during the public hearing, the
Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed conditions of
approval and findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby concludes that:
A. The following adopted City policies are most relevant to the proposed project,
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Policy A-2, Conservation Element Policy
C-8, and Economic Development Element Policy A-3, the City's Industrial, Heavy
zone, and the City's Shoreline Master Program's Urban-Harbor designation and
Chapter 4, Policies B-1 and 2, D-l, E-2, J-2, and N-2, Chapter 5, Policy D-l, and all
associated regulations,
B.
The proposed project as conditioned, is consistent with the following adopted City
policies, Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Policy A-2, Conservation Element
Policy C-8, and Economic Development Element Policy A-3, the City's Industrial,
Heavy zone, and the City's Shoreline Master Program's Urban-Harbor designation
and Chapter 4, Policies B-1 and 2, D-l, E-2, J-2, andN-2, Chapter 5, PolicyD-I, and
all associated regulations.
C. The project will not be detrimental to the shoreline.
D. As conditioned, the proposed project will not interfere with the public use oflands
or waters subject to the public trust doctrine.
The motion was seconded by Comissioner Nutter and passed 5 - o.
SHO-RELINE SUBST ANTIAL.D~LOPMENT PERMIT - SMA 99~
OJ--=-..FENINSULAllAIL Y NEW...s.,-30S WestEront..s.tre.ei: Request for a
permit to allow the demolition ofa 7,700+ warehouse in the shoreline area
in the Commercial Arterial zone. The demolition is part of a project that will
result in the construction of a 4,375 square foot new warehouse structure on
the property. The new warehouse structure is not within the shoreline.
Planner Sawyer reviewed the Planning Department's staff report recommending approval
of the proposed permit. He proposed the addition of a seventh condition which would
require the installation of additional landscaping along the north and west boundaries of the
property.
Mr. Sawyer responded to Commissioner Nutter that the plan submitted with the application
is a conceptual plan, not a detailed landscaping plan.
Plnnning Commission Minutes
July 14. 1999
Pnge7
.
Bill Rinehart, 536 East Fourth Street, represented the applicant. He stated that a
landscaping plan was submitted with the building permit application that covered the Zoning
Code requirements. He was surprised that the landscaping plan is not adequate or that the
landscaping requirements may be increased without discussion with the applicant.
At the direction of Vice Chair Hewins, Planner Sawyer responded that a specific landscaping
plan is required. If an acceptable plan has been submitted with the building permit, another
one would not be required. However, if the submittal does not specify plant types, location,
and size, that information would be required.
Mr. Rinehart noted that no excavation will be done within the shoreline area. There is
approximately four feet of fill under the existing warehouse that will be demolished. The
warehouse exists on piling. He asked that it be put on the record that the demolition of the
existing warehouse structure will be done by a volunteer work force, not through the building
industry .
.
The Planning Commission discussed their concern over the location of the most western
driveway onto Front Street because of the traffic pattern in that area. It does not seem like
a good location in that it is proposed to be very near a southerly curve where the merging of
lanes is common. It does not seem a good practice to allow a situation where a decrease in
traffic speed could occur for entrance into the parking lot, or to allow people to enter onto
Front Street at this point.
Mr. Rinehart responded that access to the site is restricted to Front Street as the alley is
barricaded preventing access from Cherry Street. The circulation plan was approved by the
City's Engineering Department. Most ofthe people using the parking lot will be employees
who will work in the new warehouse, and who will be working at night.
There being no further testimony, Vice Chair Hewins closed the public hearing.
Following further discussion regarding the parking flow, Commissioner King moved to
approve the shoreline permit with seven conditions, and citing the following findings
and conclusions:
Conditions of Approxal.:
1.
lfthe subject site has not been previously inventoried, evaluated, and reviewed to the
satisfaction of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the subject site shall be evaluated by
a cultural review team which shall include a professional archaeologist, a
representative of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the site owner, and the City
Planning Department. This team shall determine the extent of excavation monitoring
for the project during the permit review process. As an alternative, the applicant may
volunteer to have an approved archaeologist on site during any excavation in lieu of
a review by the aforementioned cultural team. If during an excavation that by
decision of the cultural review team occurs without an approved archaeologist on-
site, any phenomena of possible archaeological interest are uncovered, the developer
.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 14. 1999
Page 8
shall stop such work and provide for a site inspection and evaluation by a
professional archaeologist to ensure that all possible valuable archaeological data is
properly salvaged.
2.
The project shall comply with all regulations of the City's Shoreline Master Program
specifically those of Chapters 4, 5, 6 and 7. The City may modify site design to
reduce functional and aesthetic impact of parking.
3.
The proposed project shall meet all federal, state, and local requirements, including
the City's Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protection Area Ordinance.
4.
The project shall utilize best management practices as identified in the City of Port
Angeles Storm water Management Plan to control stormwater runoff into the
shoreline area.
5.
The project shall utilize best management practices as identified by the City of Port
Angeles Public Works Department to control erosion impacts to the shoreline area.
6.
Demolition and construction pursuant to this shoreline conditional use permit shall
not be approved until approved by the Department of Ecology and shall not begin
until 21 days from the "date of filing" as defined in RCW 90.58.140.
7.
A landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and
approval. Said plan shall include enhanced landscaping along the north and west
boundaries ofthe property to complement the Valley Creek Estuary Project. Said
improvements shall be installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the
new warehouse structure on the Peninsula Daily News property.
Eindings;
Based on the information provided in the July 14, 1999, Staff Report for SMA 99-06
(including all of its attachments), comments and information presented during the public
hearing, and the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, the City of Port
Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that:
1. The applicant, Northwest Media, Inc. LP - Peninsula Daily News applied for a
Shoreline Conditional Use Permit on May 19, 1999. The application was determined
to be complete on May 21, 1999 (see the July 14, 1999, Staff Report for SMA 99-07
Attachment A).
2.
The proposed application is for a shoreline conditional use permit to demolish a
7,716 square foot warehouse building on a site that is partially within the shoreline
area. The parking lot and landscaping areas of the new development will also be
located within the shoreline area. A new 4,375 square foot building with a 758
square foot ramp and a loading dock is being constructed on the same site outside the
200 foot shoreline boundary. The project was divided into two phases for the
purpose of separate shoreline and building permit reviews.
Planning Commission Minutes
ilIfy 14, 1999
Page 9
.
3.
The entire site was previously developed with the Peninsula Daily News warehouse
and parking.
4. A Determination of Non-Significance (#865) for the demolition and parking!
landscaping development (Phase II) was issued by the City of Port Angeles SEPA
Responsible Official on July 6, 1999 (Attachment B). A DNS (#860) for the new
building, ramp, and loading dock (phase I) was issued by the City of Port Angeles
SEP A Responsible Official on June 22, 1999 (Attachment C).
5. The application and hearing process was advertised in accordance with the legal
requirements of the City of Port Angeles and the State of Washington.
6. The Port Angeles Shoreline Master Program, Comprehensive Plan, Zoning
Ordinance and critical areas ordinances have been reviewed with respect to this
application. ln particular the following policies were identified as most relevant:
Shoreline Master Program Policies Chapter 4Bl, 4B2, 4Dl, 4El, 4I1-3, 4J2, 4N2,
Chapter 5Dl, Chapter 6Cl, 6C3, 6C4, and Regulations 6CI-5; Comprehensive Plan
Growth Management Element Goal A, Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A2, Goal
D, Policy Dl, Conservation Element Policies AI, A2, B9, B17, D5, and D8, and
Economic Development Element Policy A3 and Goal B; Zoning Code 17.23.010 and
.040-A4, B 17, and F2.
.
7.
The site is designated Commercial in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Commercial
Arterial in the City's Zoning Ordinance, and Urban-Harbor in the City's Shoreline
Master Program.
8. Chapter 5 of the City's Shoreline Master Program indicates a non-water-oriented
commercial use, such as a warehouse demolition and parking area, is a conditional
use in the U-H designation, and the U-H shoreline designation development
standards allow the City to modify site design to reduce functional and aesthetic
impact of parking.
9. Public access to the shoreline is provided visually through and physically adjacent
to this commercial site by way of the Valley Creek estuary park and the City's
waterfront trail which runs north of Front Street.
10. The proposed development will serve the existing newspaper facilities.
Conclusions:
.
Based on the information provided in the July 14, 1999, Staff Report for SMA 99-07
including all of its attachments, comments and information presented during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed
conditions of approval and findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby
concludes that:
A. The following adopted City policies are most relevant to the proposed project:
Shoreline Master Program Policies Chapter 4Bl, 4B2, 4Dl, 4El, 4I1-3, 412, 4N2,
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minutes
July J 4. 1999
Page J 0
Chapter 5Dl, Chapter 6Cl, 6C3, 6C4, and all associated regulations, particularly
Regulations 6CI-5; Comprehensive Plan Growth Management Element Goal A,
Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A2, Goal D, Policy Dl, Conservation Element
Policies AI, Al, B9, Bl 7, D5, and D8, and Economic Development Element Policy
A3 and Goal B; Zoning Code 17.23.010 and .040-A4, B 17, and F2.
B.
The proposed project as conditioned, is consistent with the following adopted City
policies: Shoreline Master Program Policies Chapter 4Bl, 4B2, 4Dl, 4El, 4I1-3,
4J2, 4N2, Chapter 5Dl, Chapter 6Cl, 6C3, 6C4, and all associated regulations,
particularly Regulations 6CI-5; Comprehensive Plan Growth Management Element
Goal A, Land Use Element Goal A, Policy A2, Goal D, Policy Dl, Conservation
Element Policies AI, A2, B9, B17, D5, and D8, and Economic Development
Element Policy A3 and Goal B; Zoning Code 17.23.010 and .040-A4, B17, and F2.
C.
The project will not be detrimental to the shoreline.
D.
The demolition of the existing warehouse and construction of the proposed parking
and landscaping will not impact the use of Front Street or the City's waterfront trail.
E.
As conditioned, the proposed project will not interfere with the public use oflands
or waters subject to the public trust doctrine.
The proposed shoreline conditional use permit is in the public interest.
F.
Tbe motion was seconded by Commissioner Nutter and passed 5 - O.
The Commission took a break at 8:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8: 1 0 p.m.
OTHER BUSINESS
Consideration of final approval of a binding site improvement plan for
the Port of Port Angeles Industrial Park.
Planning Specialist Roberds indicated that the final mylar has been prepared for the Port as
approved by the Planning Commission in May, 1999, noting that the original BSIP was
reduced to three lots. The rights-of-way have been dedicated as requested and improvements
relative to the three lots are in place.
Commissioner Nutter moved to authorize the Planning Commission Vice Chair to
authorize him to sign the final mylar. Tbe motion was seconded by Commissioner
Norton and passed 5 - O.
In response to Vice Chair Hewins, Planning Specialist Roberds explained how the process
had evolved from the original 1977 M-l, Industrial Permit, to the current BSIP. The Port
reduced the BSIP proposal to the current three lots from the original 25 following staffs
earlier report which noted that the full BSIP would require improvements to 18th Street that
the Port did not believe were necessary as the majority of the industrial park had been
developed many years ago and contained interior sidewalks.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Minllles
July 14, 1999
Page 11
Commissioner Nutter wished to express frustration with the Port that this type of piecemeal
development will never result in improvements to 18th Street.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None.
STAFF REPORTS
None
REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
Commissioner Nutter reported that the Olympic Discovery Trail is moving along very well.
She wondered what role the City is playing in the development and how coordination with
the County is occurring.
Ms. Nutter noted that the resurfacing of streets within the City which has occurred in the past
couple of months has occurred without striping for bicycle use. The streets she referred to
are 8th, Race, and "C" Streets, which are arterial and designated bicycle routes. A tandem
bicycle ralley is planned for the year 2000. One thousand bicyclists are anticipated in
attendance.
Ms. Nutter also noted that it might be desirable for staff to provide a brush up course
particularly for the Shoreline Master Plan being as there are two new Commission members,
and the Commission as a whole hasn't discussed the plan for some time.
Commissioners King and Norton noted that he would not be in attendance at the July 28,
1999, meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
u
k~
Fred Hewins, Vice Chair
Secretary
PREPARED BY: S. Roberds
PLEASE SIGN IN
PLANNING COMMISSION ATTENDANCE ROSTER
AND SIGN UP SHEET
For the items listed on the Agenda of:
Please read the following: If I testify, by sig lure below, I certify that my testimony is
true and correct under penalty of perjury by the laws of the State of Washington.
Signature Print Name Address Agenda
Item #
~Jl ~. flfilA \. ~." lM~1::)bel..\ ~): \1.).\ - -.^...l. -3
:... , or ..... I --....
-
6\ 1 \ ~ ~ INn IAt4-tA-t t\\ \ \ 't< \lk\~h(A vt.-1 ~~+~h ~Q C.
~ "'-- ~ ~ ' ~ C(',1i /ZZ1 WI 41'- f/;t, I
.- If{.M./ ..--k~ P~J ~'erL..]:~ I q 1l'L. M~"o (J....'<f( (JA I
.~ ('\ ,
"'
ef
C :\....'P\fonm\altndrsl. pc