Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 10/10/1990 . . . I. II. ill. IV. AGENDA PORT ANGELES PLANNING COMMISSION 321 East Fifth Street Port Angeles, W A 98362 October 10, 1990 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of September 26J 1990 OLD BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT REQUEST - ZCA 90(09)5 - M & R TIMBER. City wide: A proposed amendment to the Zoning Code in order to allow all residential dwelling types as a conditional use in a Planned Residential Development (continued from the September 12, 1990, meeting). 2. APPEAL QF SHORT PLAT DECISION - SHP 90(07)9 - HART. 2600 Block Milwaukee Drive: Appeal of a condition of short plat approval requiring the improvement of Milwaukee Drive adjacent to the proposed short plat (continued from the September 12J 1990, meeting). V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. STREET VACATION REQUEST - STY 90(09)5 - WINTERS. East Second Street: Request for vacation of a portion of the Second Street right-of-way east of Penn Street. 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST - CUP 90(10)18 - WHEELER. Rhodes Road and Park Knoll Drive: Request to allow a duplex in the RS-9, Residential Single-Family District. . . . Planning Commission Agenda Page 2 3. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT REOUEST - ZCA 90(10)6 - DA YIDSON - CSD District: A proposed amendment to the Zoning Code amending the conditional uses allowed in the Community Shopping District to include automated self-service car wash facilities. 4. REOUEST TO CIRCULATE AN ANNEXATION PETITION - ANX 90(0)1 - FREEMAN - South Albert and Eunice Street area: Request to allow circulation of an annexation petition for an approximately 5.7 acre parcel of property. 5. STREET Y ACATION REQUEST - STY 90(0)6 - CHARTRA W - Euclid Street: Request for vacation of a portion of the Euclid Street right-of-way at its intersection with Spruce Street. V. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC VI. STAFF REPORTS VIT. REPORTS OF COM:MlSSION MEMBERS VIII. ADJOURNMENT NOTES: The Pli1mling Commission will not, except at the discretion of the Chainnan, commence a new hearing after 10:00 P.M. Project files and applicable City land use regulatiollS may be reviewed prior to the public hearing in the Planning Department. Copies of all material in the files are available at a cost of $.25 per page. All correspondence pertaining to a hearing item received by the Planning Department at least one day prior to the scheduled hearing will be provided to Commission members before the hearing. Planning Commission: Larry Leonard, Chair: Ray Gruver, Vice-Chair; Bill Anabel; Roger CaUs: Jim Hulett; Bob Philpott and one vacancy. Planning Staff: Brad Collins, Planning Director; Grant Beck, Associate Planner; Sue Roberda, Planning Office Specialist. . . . PLANNING COMMISSION Port Angeles, Washington October 10, 1990 I CALL TO ORDER Chairman Leonard called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M. II ROLL CALL Members Present: Ray Gruver, Jim Hulett, Roger Catts, Larry Leonard, Bob Philpott, Bill Anabel. Members Absent: None - One position vacant. staff Present: Grant Beck, Bruce Becker, Ken Ridout. III APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Gruver moved to approve the minutes of the September 26, 1990, meeting as submitted. Mr. Hulett seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. IV OLD BUSINESS ZONING CODE AMENDMENT REQUEST - ZCA-90 (09) 5 - M & R TIMBER, city-wide: A proposed amendment to the Zoning Code in order to allow all residential dwelling types as a conditional use in a Planned Residential Development (continued from the September 12, 1990. meetinq). Chairman Leonard stepped down, due to a conflict of interest. vice-Chairman Gruver stated this item had been continued from the Planning Commission's September 12, 1990, meeting and at this time only rebuttal testimony would be taken. Don Corson, 813 East Eighth Street, stated he heard at the September 13th meeting that the commission agreed design flexibility was needed within the PRD Chapter of the Zoning Code~ that there is a need for mUlti-family City-wide: and that controls on mUlti-family are needed. Mr. Corson stated that other communities in Washington State have provisions for multi-family dwellings in PRDs and PUDs within single-family zones. Bill Lindberg, 319 South Peabody Street, stated that as a designer and planner, the proposal would help everyone solve problems created on environmentally sensitive sites. PRDs go through intense scrutiny and multi-family would not be given any less scrutiny. Cree Baxter, 1111 Spruce Street, stated she was previously before the Planning commission regarding a rezone application to multi-family and she is concerned about a City-wide rezone to allow mUlti-family. PLANNING COMMISSION October 10, 1990 Page 2 . Bill Dawson, 1224 West Fourth street, asked if the density could be reduced if there are topographic limits to the property, or whether the builder could build to the maximum allowed under the PRO Ordinance. Steve streeter, 1233 West Fifth street, stated the Dailv News said the lots on Fourth street could have up to 28 units. There being no further testimony, Vice-Chairman Gruver closed the public hearing. Mr. Hulett moved to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment to the city Council, citing the following findings and conclusions: Findinqs: 1. The Planned Residential Development Chapter of the Zoning Code was developed, in part, to allow design flexibility and innovation in residential development. . 3. The applicants have indicated that allowing mul tiple- family buildings in all Planned Residential Developments (inclUding those in single-family zones) allows more flexibility and innovation in residential developments. The Port Angeles Zoning Code requires the Planning Commission and City Council ensure any development processed as a Conditional Use be compatible with the surrounding land uses. 2. Conclusions: A. The Zoning Code Amendment would provide more flexibility to Planned Residential Developments while ensuring PRDs with multiple-family housing are compatible with sur- rounding areas. B. The Zoning Code Amendment is in the public use and interest and implements the Policies and Goals of the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Catts seconded the motion, which carried 5 - O. Chairman Leonard returned to the Dais. . APPEAL OF SHORT PLAT DECISION - SHP-90(07)9 - HART, 2600 Block Milwaukee Drive: Appeal of a condition of short plat approval requiring the improvement of Milwaukee Drive adjacent to the proposed short plat. (Continued from the September 12, 1990, meetinq.) Chairman Leonard opened the public hearing. Mr. Beck presented the Department Report indicating that the Planning Department had approved the short plat with the condition that . PLANNING COMMISSION October 10, 1990 Page 3 Milwaukee Drive adjacent to the short plat be upgraded to city arterial standards. Marlene Hart, 1216 South "A" Street, stated that she and her husband would prefer to place gravel and ballast up to and adjacent to the property on Milwaukee Drive, rather than pave the street. Jim Abernathy, 527 Rose Street, asked whether Milwaukee Drive will be open from both ends. There being no further testimony, Chairman Leonard closed the public hearing. The Planning Commission questioned staff regarding fire access and what portions of Milwaukee Drive would be opened. Fire Marshal Bruce Becker stated water and be required for fire protection purposes. Public Works Ken Ridout indicated the Milwaukee Drive could be opened. a gravel road would Deputy Director of entire length of Mr. Hulett moved to uphold the appeal and amend Condition A to read: . Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall improve that portion of Milwaukee Drive adjacent to the property, as required by Section 16.04.140(e) PAMC and the Depart- ment of Public Works: or enter into a non-protest agree- ment for the improvement of Milwaukee Drive; and improve Milwaukee Drive to Department of Public Works gravel road standards. Mr. Gruver seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. V PUBLIC HEARINGS STREET VACATION REQUEST - STV-90(09)5 - WINTERS, East Second Street: Request for vacation of a portion of the Second Street riqht-of-wav east of Penn Street. Mr. Gruver stepped down from the dais, due to appearance of fairness. . There being no representative of the applicant present in the audience, Chairman Leonard opened the pUblic hearing and Mr. Hulett moved to continue the hearing to November 14, 1990, at 7:00 P.M., or shortly thereafter, in the City Council Chambers. Mr. Catts seconded the motion, which carried 5 - o. Mr. Gruver returned to the dais. PLANNING COMMISSION October 10, 1990 Page 4 . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST - CUP-90(10) 18 - WHEELER, Rhodes Road and Park Knoll Drive: Request to allow a duplex in the RS-9. Residential Single-FamilY District. Mr. Catts stepped down from the dais due to an appearance of fairness problem. Chairman Leonard opened the public hearing. Mr. Beck presented the Department Report recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit, subject to one condition relating to maintaining existing drainage. Steve zenovic, 111 East Third Street, representing the appli- cant, stated that the drainage ditch is north of the property, which is a level area. There is no wetland vegetation or hydric soils on the site. There is a sewer line which runs to the property and the site would not be served by a septic system. . Mr. Zenovic stated that the Planning Commission must determine if the proposed use of a duplex is compatible with the exist- ing neighborhood. The lot is in excess of 14,000 square feet and will meet all development standards for duplexes as found in the Zoning Code. The area to the south of the property, along Thistle Street, is developed to a much greater density than this proposal. Jane Schefler, 3717 Park Knoll Drive, stated the neighborhood opposes the Conditional Use Permit. Ms. Schefler circulated a petition with approximately 40 signatures, representing 25 households. The Thistle Street area was "grandfathered" for the density existing there when it came into the City. There are no other duplexes in the area. The property is in the middle of an RS-9 Zone and the approval of the Conditional Use Permit could constitute a spot rezone. The area has a high water table and the property provides a drainage area for the entire neighborhood. Ms. Schefler further stated there is a septic tank on the property and that a duplex would be incompatible with the existing single-family neighborhood. Werner Quast, 3800 Park Knoll Drive, stated he had signed the petition tonight in order to protect the applicant from misinformation presented at the hearing regarding drainage and sewage. . Mr. Quast said the water in the ditch drains east from the Jensen residence and it crosses Park Knoll Drive in a culvert, which is over-burdened. The drainage from the entire area to the south flows across Rhodes Road to the ditch and then down to the canyon. The City plugged the culvert under Rhodes Road near the property and Park Knoll Drive now floods. The prop- erty is under water during the wet season. PLANNING COMMISSION October 10, 1990 Page 5 . Mr. Quast requested the Planning Commission find out where the sewage goes. Chairman Leonard requested the applicant speak to the issue of sewage disposal. Steve Zenovic distributed a copy of the City sewer system map. The map shows there is a 2" line installed to the property, with a lift system installed on the site. The sewage disposal system is existing and would be used by the duplex. Mr. Zenovic agrees that the property would not support a septic system and that is why a septic system was not proposed. . Cindy Witham, 3760 Hill Circle, stated that she had recently built a home in the area and has seen bulldozers, graders, and dump trucks at work, and is concerned that this machinery would disturb the drainage pattern in the area. Ms. Witham asked the Planning Commission who would be responsible for flooding damage from any changes to the pattern. Upon questioning from the Planning Commiss ion, Ms. witham stated that she was unsure if a duplex would have worse impacts on the drainage system than a single-family dwelling, and that a duplex would be acceptable on an 18,000 square-foot lot. Jim Abernathy, 527 Rose Street, stated that the property is in a single-family zone and the neighborhood is being asked to allow an economic gain by a specific developer for this property. Lucille Schmitt, 3709 Park Knoll Drive, stated that the Commission should consider the drainage problem. If the required area for fixing the drainage takes part of the property, that portion of the site should not be counted toward the 14,000 square feet required for a duplex in the RS-9 Zone. Mike craig, 3830 Canyon edge Drive, stated that he is not a civil engineer or a wetlands biologist, but he knows for a fact that the duplex will affect wildlife habitat, even if the area is not a wetland. Mr. Craig requested the planning Commission review the drainage pattern in the winter. Mr. Craig stated the City Planning Commission should confer with its lawyers in order to avoid lawsuits in the future regarding flood damage. . There being no new testimony, Chairman Leonard opened the hearing to rebuttal testimony. Steve Zenovic stated that the area has drainage problems, which is not applicable to this proposal. The duplex will not disturb the existing drainage, and based on the proposed condition of the Conditional Use Permit, will not add new surface water to the drainage pattern. PLANNING COMMISSION October 10, 1990 Page 6 . The Planning Commission asked what the proposed square-footage of the duplex would be. Mr. Zenovic responded that the duplex and the carport are approximately 2,450 square feet, or 20% lot coverage. Werner Quast asked why a holding tank is needed. The Planning Commission directed this question to Mr. Zenovic, who stated that a 211 sewer line is adequate in a pressurized system, and the holding tank is part of the pressurization system which was put in for this lot. Jane Schefler reiterated that the majority of the people in the neighborhood do not believe the duplex is compatible with the existing area. There being no further rebuttal testimony, Chairman Leonard closed the public hearing. . Mr. Philpott stated that it appears the property is not in the path of the drainage ditch; that the site meets the area standards for duplexes in the Zoning Code; that a 2,400 square-foot building is compatible with a single-family dwelling; that the structure would be hooked up to the City sewer system; and based on this, he saw no problems with approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Chairman Leonard stated that 2,400 square feet was fairly standard for a small single-family dwelling; that the drainage issue had been addressed; and that the sewage is apparently not a problem. . Mr. Gruver stated he agrees with the previous statements and is somewhat thankful that whatever is developed on the property is done so under a Conditional Use Permit in order to ensure that the drainage impacts are addressed. Mr. Gruver moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit application, subject to the following condition, and citing the following findings and conclusions: Condition: . A. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposed duplex, the applicant shall submit a drainage plan to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Prior to occupancy of the structure, all improvements required by the drainage plan shall be installed by the applicant and approved by the Department of Public Works. Findinqs: 1. The property is in a Residential single-Family zoning District (RS-9) which allows duplexes on 14,000 square- foot lots as a conditional use. PLANNING COMMISSION October 10, 1990 Page 7 . 2. The property is 14,600 square feet in area, is located at the corner of Park Knoll Drive and Rhodes Road and is currently undeveloped. 3. The surrounding area is zoned RS-9 and is currently occupied by single-family dwellings and vacant land. Areas to the east are platted, while areas to the north, south, and west are unplatted or short-platted into larger lots. 4. The open space provided, aesthetic design, and parking of the proposed duplex are similar to and compatible with the single-family residences in the neighborhood. Conclusions: A. The proposed duplex, as conditioned, is compatible with the intent of the RS-9 Zoning District and with the surrounding land uses. B. The proposed duplex is in the public use and interest and is not detrimental to the public welfare. . Mr. Anabel seconded the motion, which carried 5 - O. Mr. Hulett requested City staff review the drainage situation in the area in the future. Mr. Catts rejoined the Commission. Chairman Leonard called for a break at 9:25 P.M. and the meet- ing reconvened at 9:40 P.M. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT REQUEST - ZCA-90(10)6 - DAVIDSON - CSD District: A proposed amendment to the Zoning Code amending the conditional uses allowed in the Community Shopping District to include automated self-service car wash facilities. Chairman Leonard opened the public hearing. Mr. Beck presented the Department Report recommending approval of the Zoning Code Amendment, with different wording than proposed by the applicant. . Gary Davidson, 1087 pierce Road, representing the applicant, showed a video of a touchless car wash system. He stated there are brush systems very similar to the one shown on the video and that no blowers are used to dry the cars after they are washed. Linda deBord, 307 East Seventh street, urged the Commission to approve the Zoning Code Amendment, as technology has satisfied all nuisance characteristics of a car wash in the CSD Districts. PLANNING COMMISSION October 10, 1990 Page 8 . There being no further testimony, Chairman Leonard closed the public hearing. Mr. Gruver moved to approve the Zoning Code Amendment, as recommended by staff, citing the following findings and conclusions: Findinqs: 1. The Community Shopping District Zones eC1 and C2) were created to allow neighborhood services of a less intense nature than allowed in the Arterial Commercial or Central Business Districts. 2. The CSD-C1 and C2 Zones currently allow independent, non- automated, self-service car washes as a conditional use. 3. Technological advances in the field of car washes have developed automated self-service systems which are quiCk and quiet and have none of the nuisance characteristics of a full-scale commercial car wash. ConClusions: . A. The Zoning Code Amendment furthers the intent of the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. B. The Zoning Code Amendment is in the public use and interest. Mr. Hulett seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Mr. Gruver moved to continue the meeting beyond the 10 P.M. deadline. Mr. Catts seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. REQUEST TO CIRCULATE AN ANNEXATION PETITION - ANX-90(10) 1 - FREEMAN - South Albert and Eunice street area: Request to allow circulation of an annexation petition for an approximatelY 5.7 acre parcel of property. Chairman Leonard opened the public hearing. Mr. Beck presented the Department Report, recommending the Planning Commission authorize circulation of an annexation petition. Chairman Leonard asked if one home is developed on the property, what improvements would be required. . Deputy Director of Public Works Ridout indicated a 20-foot gravel surface road, water, sewer, and electric would be needed for a single home. Julie Bondy, 717 South Peabody street, representing the aplicant, stated that Mr. Freeman inherited the property and is coming into the City in order to protect groundwater from PLANNING COMMISSION October 10, 1990 Page 9 . septic systems on the property. The development would pay for itself by providing a road to existing City streets. Ms. Bondy stated that the significant trees on the site would be maintained in any development of the site. There being no further testimony, Chairman Leonard closed the public hearing. Mr. Gruver moved to approve the request to circulate an annexation petition, citing the following findings and conclusions: Findinqs: 1. The proposal would annex approximately 5.7 acres south- east of the existing City limits, south of Thistle Street and east of Old Mill Road into the city of Port Angeles. The property is bounded by City limits to the north and west and by Olympic National Park on the east. 2. The proposed annexation area is not served by any County roads or other services. 3. The annexation area is currently zoned by Clallam County as Rural Residential 2, which allows a single home on 2.4 acres, or 4 homes per acre in a planned unit development. . 4. One hundred percent of the property owners within the proposed annexation signed the request to circulation an annexation petition. Conclusions: A. The proposed annexation is consistent with the Policies of the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan. B. The proposed annexation is consistent with the policies of Chapter 35A.14 RCW. Mr. Catts seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. STREET VACATION REQUEST - STV-90 (10) 6 - CHARTRAW - Euclid street: Request for vacation of a portion of the Euclid Street right-of-way at its intersection wi th Spruce Street. Chairman Leonard opened the public hearing. Mr. Beck presented the Department Report recommending denial of the street vacation petition. . Roger Chartraw, 1102 Spruce street, stated there has been construction on the north side of Spruce Street in the vacated Euclid Street right-of-way, which indicates that Euclid could never access to the Boulevard. Mr. Chart raw stated he did not want a road accessing from 101 to Spruce Street. PLANNING COMMISSION October 10, 1990 Page 10 . Upon questioning by the Planning Commission, Mr. Chartraw stated he talked to the previous owners of the property across Euclid street from his property, who were supportive of the vacation, but did not want to joint the petition. Buck Offermann, 147 Benson Road, stated he could not see the sign posted on the property and requested the Planning Commis- sion continue this matter until additional public notice could be given. The owners on Hazel street have only one access and Euclid street could be constructed in order to provide addi- tional access to these areas. Other streets in the area should be vacated for park purposes. Cree Baxter, 1111 Spruce street, recommended the Planning Commission approve the street vacation request, as Euclid will never be a through street to Boulevard. Jim deBord, 1309 East Seventh street, stated that Euclid Street should go through in order to provide internal access in the area. There being no further testimony, Chairman Leonard opened the meeting to rebuttal testimony. . Roger Chartraw stated the sign was visible from Spruce Street. Jim deBord stated the sign was far back from Spruce Street and barely visible, and that the legal notice was not in the sec- tion of the newspaper where legal notices normally are found, but on page 3 in a special supplement. There being no further testimony, Chairman Leonard closed the public hearing. Mr. Anabel moved to deny the street vacation petition, citing the following findings and conclusions: Findinqs: 1. The City maintains an 8-inch PVC sewer line in the Euclid Street right-of-way. The Department of Public Works indicated that the street right-Of-way could be used for public access or utility purposes in the future. 2. The Department of Public Works has been attempting to get right-of-way in the area, including Euclid street, rededicated to the City for street and utility purposes. . Conclusions: A. The proposed street vacation is not in the pUblic use and interest and would not be a public benefit. Mr. Gruver seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. . . . PLANNING COMMISSION October 10, 1990 Page 11 Mr. Gruver stated that testimony received had indicated that the area does not have adequate park facilities and he requested staff pass this finding on to the Parks Department. V COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC None. VI STAFF REPORTS Mr. Beck stated that the Planning Commission had received information regarding the Ennis Creek Estates PRO, inclUding the latest maps, letters from the applicant and his attorney, and a letter from staff to the developer. The Commission asked if the concerns raised in staff I s letter had been addressed by the developer. Mr. Beck stated that the developer's architect had indicated revised maps addressing the technical deficiencies in the revised site plan would be forwarded to the Planning Department no later than Thursday, October 11th. The Planning Commission expressed concern that they and the public would not have sufficient time to review all the revised site plans prepared by OelHur regarding this proposal. Based on this concern, Mr. Hulett moved to cancel the special meeting scheduled for October 17th and continue the hearing scheduled for that date until October 30, 1990/ at 7:00 P.M. or soon thereafter in the City council Chambers. Mr. Gruver seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Brad Collins, who had joined the Planning Commission at approximately 10: 30 P.M., stated he had been part of an Initiative 547 forum in which he and several other persons had spoken against the initiative and an equal numper of people had spoken for the initiative. Mr. Collins reviewed the meeting for the Planning Commission. VII REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS Mr. Gruver indicated that in the packet was a paper on the mitigated DNS and its use and misuse in Washington state. Mr. Gruver requested the Commission review the paper and hopefully, it would be helpful for them in reviewing SEPA and enforcement issues. Mr. Hulett noted that the City Council was reviewing the possibility of creating two Planning Commissions: one for long-range items and one for current planning items. Mr. Hulett stated that earlier this year, the Planning Commission had reviewed this matter and had determined it was not the best solution ensuring long-range planning matters are attended to. . . . PLANNING COMMISSION October 10, 1990 Page 12 Chairman Leonard polled the Commission as to their feelings regarding creating a second Planning Commission. The Planning Commission unanimously did not favor this proposal. Mr. Catts reported on the October lOth Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee meeting. Mr. Philpott noted he had reviewed the tapes of the Ennis Creek Estates PRD public hearings which he had missed. Mr. Philpott is prepared to take action on this item with the remainder of the Planning commission. Chairman Leonard noted that the microphone on the podium was having problems again. VIII ADJOURNMENT There being no further items, the meeting was adjourned at 11:40 P.M. c~~~ PLAN. 393 . . . . ~ . . PLANNING COMMISSION October 10, 1990 Page 12 Chairman Leonard polled the Commission as to their feelings regarding creating a second Planning Commission. The Planning Commission unanimously did not favor this proposal. Mr. Catts reported on the October loth Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee meeting. Mr. Philpott noted he had reviewed the tapes of the Ennis Creek Estates PRD public hearings which he had missed. Mr. Philpott is prepared to take action on this item with the remainder of the Planning Commission. Chairman Leonard noted that the microphone on the podium was having problems again. VIII ADJOURNMENT There being no further items, the meeting was adjourned at 11:40 P.M. Chairman PLAN. 393 I I I CITY of PORT ANGELES ATTENDANCE ROSTER .0(.4 HM'''() TYPE OF NEEl'ING PLANNING COMMISSION nm: OF MEETING 1(9-/0 -90 IOCATIOO CI'1Y HALL NAME: ADDRESS: no;) L?or<J'opJ ~eL /J1:::;S,~L~ 3 P J-"~L S; y/3 E. at: -- fA . t..J / '7 -T - .5..:I9 l Q 4- ~ JJJJ Iv S-Tf/ J"T PA :2..3"3 . 0 "t. L 27 5~ ~~ 93-1 it) .I6JVd.#-Q(!) Y ='l ~ /a ill 8 s~ ,itA . tf - e:~~/J).J;J 13, o;~;:::f::.J;-<ArA }.Ip < ~AV~ /1:)<97 p~ RD. P/l- . I : I CITY of PORT ANGELES ATTENDANCE ROSTER ,0(,. NN\.G TYPE OF NEE'I'ING om: OF MEE:l'ING lCCATIrn PLANNING COMMISSION CITY HALL ADDRESS: NAME: 380'iS ParK.. Rno \1 b (r'", \ I.. l \ I..l , ( U L." c..,.. /?a,