Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 10/25/1995 HEARING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR THOSE NEEDING ASSISTANCE. . I. n. m. . IV. 1. PI..~NN\""G AGENDA CITY OF PORT ANGELES PLANNING COMMISSION 321 East Fifth Street Port Angeles, W A 98362 October 25) 1995 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Meetings of September 13 and October 11, 1995 PUBLIC HEARINGS: ZONING CODE AMENDMENT - ZCA 94(1)07 - CITY OF PORT ANGELES. REVISION TO WNING DESIGNA nONS IN SOME AREAS OF THE CITY City-wide: Final deliberation by the Planning Commission in the process of revising the City's Zoning Map in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan which was adopted in 1994 and updated in June, 1995. The public hearing on this issue was closed on October 11, 1995. V. COMMUNICA TrONS FROM THE PUBLIC VI. STAFF REPORTS VII. REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS VIll. ADJOURNMENT All correspondence pertaining to a hearing item received by the Planning Department at least one day prior to the scheduled hearing will be provided to Commission members before the hearing. ., PLANNlNG COMMlSSION: Linda Nuner,CJWr. rim German (Vice), Orvil1e Campbell, Cindy Souders, Bob \\rmlcrs, Bob Philpott, Bob King. STAFF: Brad Collins, Director, Suc Roberds Office Specialist, and David Sawyer. Senior Planncr. . . . PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURE: Spokesmen for the proponents and opponents will be given an opportunity to speak to the request. Information submitted should be factual, relevant and not merely duplication of a previous presentation. A reasonable time (10 minutes) shall be allowed the spokesman; others shall be limited to short supporting remarks (5 minutes). Other interested parties will be allowed to corrunent briefly (5 minutes each) or make inquiries. The Chairman may allow additional public testimony if the issue warrants it. Brief rebuttal (5 minutes) for proponents and opponents will be heard separately and consecutively with presentation limited to their spokesman. Rebuttal shall be limited to factual statements pertaining to previous testimony. Comments should be directed to the Board, not the City Staff representatives present, unless directed to do so by the Chairman. . . . MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION Port Angeles, Washington 98362 October 25, 1995 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Orville Campbell, Bob King, Cindy Souders, Linda Nutter, Bob Philpott, Bob Winters Commissioners Absent: Tim German Staff Present: Brad Collins, Sue Roberds Public Present: Pam Tietz, Jerry Austin, Jack Glaubert, John Ralston APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Souders moved to approve the September 13, 1995, minutes as submitted at the October 11, 1995, meeting. Commissioner Philpott seconded the motion, which passed 6 - O. Corrections to the October II, 1995, minutes were noted as being the correction of the vote on approval of the August 9, 1995, minutes, correction to the address of applicant Gaflhey's address, correction of Lincoln Park to be Erickson Park, and to expand on the reference to Initiative 164 to include the wording "( Referendum 48)" under "Staff Reports". Commissioner CampbeU moved to approve the October 11,1995, minutes as corrected. Commissioner King seconded the motion which passed 6-0 . CONTINUED ITEM REZONE PROPOSAL - REZ 94(11107 - CITY OF PORT ANGELES - Citv- wide: A proposal to rezone various properties within the City in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. (The public hearing for this item was closed following the October 11, 1995, public hearing.) Planning Director Collins noted for the record that the public hearing for this proposal was closed following theOctobei 11, '1995, public hearing, and reviewed the display map noting those areas on the map which are being considered for zoning redesignations. He further explained the correlation between the display map and Table 1 of the supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) (attached as Exhibit "A") information prepared and distributed to the Commissioners prior to the October 11, 1995, public hearing and presented a list (attached as "Exhibit B") of areas that specific testimony had been provided for during the public hearing. Inconsistencies between the current Comprehensive Plan Map and the City's Official Zoning Map are the major factors behind the need to rezone certain properties Planning Commiuion Mi1lUlu . October 25. 1995 Page 2 . within the City. The map also contains many housekeeping corrections that have been found such as areas where street names were inadvertently left off or City blocks or subdivisions were not noted on previous maps including annexations to the northwest and southeast portions of the City that were never shown correctly on previous maps. Commissioner Souders asked for clarification that the Map change for the Ennis Creek Planned Residential District (PRO) area is only a reflection of the underlying zoning not a change in the zone. Director Collins indicated that the Map revisions do not change the existing underlying zoning. Commissioner Campbell suggested that given the neighborhood concerns expressed over the proposed rezones to Residential Medium Density (RMD) for certain properties within the City (Campbell Avenue and West Eighteenth Street) without specific development approval, that perhaps ifPRD's are required for development to medium density standards, certain properties proposed for rezone to RMD may be more acceptable to their individual neighborhoods. Considerable discussion resulted from this theory. Director Collins responded that although the City's PRD process is site specific, precedent has been set in other areas of the state for rezone of property with an overlay zone where such rezone is contingent upon approval of a site specific plan. . Commissioner Souden moved to rezone the property located north of Eighteenth Street, south of Tenth Street, east of"P" Street and west of "M" Street, approximatdy 127 acres, noted in the supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) as areas 1 - 3, from RS-9, Residential Single Family to RMD, Residential Medium Density. Commissioner Winters seconded the motion, which passed 6 - o. Commissioner Winters moved to rezone the property located west of Newell Road (described as Area No.4 in the SEIS) to the "c" Street Extension from RS-9, Residential Single Family, to RMD, Residential Medium Density. Commissioner Philpott seconded the motion, which passed 6 - O. . Commissioner Winters moved to rezone all of Block 175 (described as Area No. to in the SEIS), including the properties extending two lots deep along both sides of Race Street extending south from Block 175 (Fourth Street) to Seventh Street, from RS-7, Residential Single Family, to RMD, Residential Medium Density. Commissioner Souders seconded the motion, which passed 4 - 2, with Commissioners Nutter and Philpott voting in the negative. Commissioners Philpott and Nutter noted that their negative votes were due to the negative public input during the public hearing discussion. Commissioner Souders stated that her reason for voting for the RMD change is due to her belief that an RMD zone in the subject area encourages development of the empty lots by allowing for a mix of residential development in an area that is heavily impacted by the arterial Race Street without encouraging commercial use. The Commission took a break at 8:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:40 p.m. Planning Commission Minules - OClober 25. /995 Page 3 . Discussion resumed regarding the rezone of property presently designated RMD to PBP, Public Buildings and Parks, for the 7.57 acres of property owned by the Public Utility District located directly west of Peninsula College. Commissioner Philpott moved to keep the property (identified as Area No. 12 in the SEIS) as PBP. Commissioner Campbell seconded the motion, which passed 6 - O. Commissioner Souders moved to designate the approximately 2.05 acres of property located in Suburban Lot 27 west of Ennis Creek Road (identified as Area No. 22 in the SEIS) to reflect the top of the bank on the property as the end of the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone on the site and the beginning of the PBP, Public Buildings and Parks zone, which is intended to reflect the Ennis Creek Ravine bank as an environmentally sensitive area. Commissioner Winters seconded the motion, which passed 6 - O. Commissioner King moved to leave the approximately 3.07 acres (identified as Area No. 32 in the SEIS) located directly east of the Red Lion Inn in its present designation at this time (Industrial Light) due to other concerns affecting the property. Commissioner Campbell seconded the motion, which passed 6 - O. . Commissioner Philpott moved to rezone the approximately 1.8 acres presently designated Residential Single Family, (identified as Area No. 57 in the SEIS) located south of Fountain along Highway 101 in Block 19, Pennsylvania Park Addition to CN, Commercial Neighborhood (shown as CSD on the map which is correct). Commissioner King seconded the motion, which passed 6 - O. At this juncture, Commissioner Souders left the meeting due to an appearance of fairness with the remaining areas under discussion. The Commission began discussion of the proposal to rezone the approximately 51 acres including 18 acres owned by Clallam County located at the southeast side of the City, east of Mount Angeles Road, south of Campbell Avenue (identified as Area No.5 in the SEIS), which was the subject of a recent rezone denial. Other properties in the area contain residential high density and residential single family uses. Commissioner Winters noted that this would be a good area for the requirement of a planned residential development binding site plan requirement for rezone as previously suggested by Commissioner Campbell. Due to the history, previous testimony provided earlier in the year at the time of the failed rezone request and the inadequate infrastructure, the planned residential requirement would ensure the neighborhood the greatest degree of input into any development proposal which may arise from a rezone to RMD. . Commissioner Philpott referred to the detailed testimony and lengthy record of objection provided in public hearings in response to the County's previous request to rezone the property in question earlier in 1995. Vacancy rate information provided during those earlier hearings does not support the need to designate as much property for multi-family development as previously thought. Given the current recommendation to rezone other areas . . . Planning Commission Minules - Oclober 25, 1995 Page 4 of the City for medium density development he questioned whether this additional area is warranted when the neighborhood has expressed such strong opposition and because the rental market at present is very soft. Commissioner Nutter did not feel that anything has changed since the Commission recommended denial of the rezone to medium density for the property in question earlier in the year to warrant reconsideration of this request. Commissioner Campbell stated that if all the properties recommended for change by the Commission and staff at this time, including the County's 18 acres, are rezoned to RMD, the result would still be only four percent of the City's acreage in that designation which is not a sufficient amount to accommodate a twenty year outlook for the City's needs. If a PRD is required for development of the subject property, many of the neighbors expressed concerns could be addressed in this case. Commissioner Winters moved to recommend rezone of the approximately 51 acres, including 18 acres of property owned by Clallam County, identified as Area No.5 in the SEIS located south of Campbell Avenue from Residential Single Family, to RMD, Residential Medium Density, with the requirement that a Planned Residential Development be approved for the property prior to any development to the RMD zone. Commissioner Campbell seconded the motion. Commissioner Winters spoke to his motion stating that a PRD is a compromise that allows for the degree of public involvement that the neighbors have testified they need in order to feel comfortable with a proposal such as the County has stated is their intention for development of this property, a good sized low and moderate income family housing development. Commissioner Campbell agreed that if neighbors have a chance for a significant say in the development process for a property there is the distinct possibility that the resulting development will be a credit to the neighborhood. One of the City's goals is to provide opportunities to all its citizens for quality affordable housing. Commissioner King agreed that a PRD overlay requirement will solve the problems and concerns expressed for the Campbell Avenue neighborhood in the development of this property to a medium density zone. Commissioner Nutter remained firm in her belief that the neighborhood testimony received during public hearings warranted that the area remain in the existing residential single family designation. On call for the question, the motion passed 3 - 2, with Commissioners Nutter and Philpott voting in the negative for the reasons expressed in the discussion. Commissioner Philpott expressed disappointment in the motion but understood that the PRD provision for the subject area on Campbell Avenue would provide some certainty for the . . . Planning Commission Minutes - October 25. 1995 Page 5 neighborhood that they will have a significant amount of input to any development that is proposed for the County's property. With the exception of the areas voted on previously, and including Area No. 48, which was specifically left unchanged as IL, wf1'ieJJ:.war~cific~ed'~ Commissioner Winters moved to recommend that the rest of the changes recommended in the SEIS Table 1 and on the Planning Department presentation map be rezoned to the proposed designations. Commissioner King seconded the motion, which passed 5 - O. Commissioner Campbell moved to fOrn'ard the aforementioned recommendations to the City Council for rezone citing the following findings and conclusions: Findings: I. The Growth Management Act of 1990 required that the City of Port Angeles adopt a Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations consistent with the Act and its goals. 2. Over five years ago the City of Port Angeles formed a citizens' Growth Management Advisory Committee to recommend a Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations based on community involvement with early and continuous public participation in the planning process. 3. The Growth Management Advisory Committee met weekly for many of the months during this long planning process, and the City held numerous public meetings and public hearings on each step in this process. 4. On June 28, ] 994, the City of Port Angeles adopted a Comprehensive Plan in compliance with the Act and the legislative deadline of July], 1994, and on June 20, 1995, the City of Port Angeles adopted its first annual update of the Comprehensive Plan in compliance with the Act. 5. A Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for proposed Zoning Map reclassification changes was issued by the City on October 3, ] 995. 6. The Development Regulations including the Zoning Code and Map must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. 7. All properties throughout the City were reviewed for land use designation differences between the adopted Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map. 8. All differences between the Comp Plan and Zoning land use designations were considered by the Growth Management Advisory Committee and the Planning Department staff, and areawide zoning reclassifications were recommended by the . . . Planning Commission Minules . OClOber 25. 1995 Page 5 neighborhood that they will have a significant amount of input to any development that is proposed for the County's property. With the exception of the areas voted on previously, and including Area No. 48, which was specifically left unchanged as IL, Commissioner Winters moved to recommend that the rest of the changes recommended in the SEIS Table 1 and on the Planning Department presentation map be rezoned'o the proposed designations. Commissioner King seconded the motion, which passed 5 - O. Commissioner Campbell moved to forward the aforementioned recommendations to the City Council for rezone citing the following findings and conclusions: Findings: I. The Growth Management Act of 1990 required that the Ci ty of Port Angeles adopt a Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations consistent with the Act and its goals. 2. Over five years ago the City of Port Angeles formed a citizens' Growth Management Advisory Committee to recommend a Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations based on community involvement with early and continuous public participation in the planning process. 3. The Growth Management Advisory Committee met weekly for many of the months during this long planning process, and the City held numerous public meetings and public hearings on each step in this process. 4. On June 28, 1994, the City of Port Angeles adopted a Comprehensive Plan in compliance with the Act and the legislative deadline of July I, 1994, and on June 20, 1995, the City of Port Angeles adopted its first annual update of the Comprehensive Plan in compliance with the Act. 5. A Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for proposed Zoning Map reclassification changes was issued by the City on October 3, 1995. 6. The Development Regulations including the Zoning Code and Map must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. 7. All properties throughout the City were reviewed for land use designation differences between the adopted Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map. 8. All differences between the Comp Plan and Zoning land use designations were considered by the Growth Management Advisory Committee and the Planning Department staff, and areawide zoning reclassifications were recommended by the . . . Plannir/g Commissior/ Minutes - October 25. 1995 Page 6 GMAC to the Planning Commission and the City Council for resolution of these differences. 9. All Comprehensive Plan goals, policies, and objectives, including Growth Management Goal A, Land Use Goal A, Policies Al & A.2, Objective AI, Goal B, Goal C, Policy C. I, Goal D, Policy 0.2, Goal E, Policies E.6 & E.8, Goal F, Policy F.3, Goal G, Policy G.2, Goal H, Policy H4, Goal I, Policy I. I, Goal J, Policy 1.1, Transportation Goal A, Goal B, Policies B.IO & B. 13, Housing Goal A, Policies Al & A. 2, Ojbectives B.l & B.2, Conservation Goal A, Policy A2, Economic Development Policies Al & B.5, were considered by the GMAC in making recommended changes to the Zoning Regulations. 10. Notices for Zoning Code Amendments, including a new Forest Lands Zone, and Mapping Rezones, including additional public hearing notices for Zoning Map changes, were given per the City and State legal requirements for areawide zoning amendments and reclassifications. 11. Notices of the areawide zoning reclassifications and amendments were mailed to 132 different property owners of 180 properties affected by reclassifications and to 5 citizens requesting notification of changes in the Zoning Regulations. 12. Zoning classifications that permit the same uses or uses of less intensity than Comprehensive Plan land use designations are considered by the City to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 13. The Environmentallrnpact Statement on the Comprehensive Plan was adopted for the proposed changes in the Zoning Code Regulations. 14. A series of neighborhood public meetings were held by the Planning Commission in May, June, and July, 1995, to give the public additional notice and opportunity to review and understand the nature of the Zoning Map changes. IS. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is a twenty year forecast of the land supply needs for all land uses in the City of Port Angeles, and the Zoning Map designates the amount of land to be supplied for each classification of land uses at this time. 16. The Comprehensive Plan makes no designation of resource lands within the City of Port Angeles; however, property owners may wish to undertake commercial .. -"production-of timber-and so the -F orest Lands.(FL) Zone -has been included as a new classification. 17. The Comprehensive Plan makes a distinction between light industrial and industrial park uses, and a new classification of Industrial Park (IP) has been added to the Zoning Code, although no land has been designated as yet. . . . Plannmg Comm;ssionMinules. October 15.1995 Page 7 18. Ten acres is the existing supply of land for Residential Medium Density (RMD), a more recent zoning classification, and the Planning Commission recommends a greater supply ofRMD zoned land to meet the future needs for affordable housing. 19. The Planning Commission received considerable public testimony expressing the desire for continue opportunity for community input into the development of the area southeast of the corner of Campbell Avenue and Porter Street. 20. The Planned Residential Development (pRD) overlay zone requires continued opportunities for public review and input on development plans for each site that is larger than one acre. 21. Area ill #5 is transected by the BP A power transmission lines and includes several delineated wetlands. 22. The Planning Commission recommends imposing a PRD requirement on the RMD rezone of Area ill #5 southeast of the corner of Campbell Avenue and Porter Street to provide for both the land supply needed for future affordable housing and the opportunity for continued public participation in site specific development plans. 23. Clallam County has offered the Clallam County Housing Authority ten acres of property south of Campbell Avenue and east of Porter Street for the development of low and moderate income housing, and the Housing Authority with much public involvement has prepared site specific plans for such a development. 24. Area ID #22 and Area ill #32 are both identified environmentally sensitive areas which are adjacent to commercia1lindustrial uses; however, the natural character of Area ID #22 remains undisturbed, while the natural character of Area ill #32 remains in question and subject to ongoing preservation and access analyses. 25. Area ill #24 is a surface body of water where enhancement and preservation of water quality is desired. 26. There are a number of corrections, not zoning changes, needed for the Zoning Map to reflect the various Ordinances establishing the zones, including Area ill Numbers 19,20,24,51, and 72, as well as the two recent annexations along Golf Course Road and south of Melody Lane and Lindberg Road respectively and the Niichel/Hurworth property next to the Golf Course off Del Guzzi Drive. 27. The Public Buildings and Parks (PBP) Zone may be designated as following the top or bottom of a bluff or bank as determined by the City Engineer, and the precise boundary of such a PBP Zone will be determined by field demarcation. . . . Planmng CommIssion Minutes. October 25. 1995 Page 8 Conclusions: 1. The Zoning Code Amendments and Reclassifications are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Use Map designations. 2. The Zoning Map changes do not intentionally create nonconforming uses. 3. The Zoning Regulation changes intentionally recognize existing and planned uses in those areas of the City where the uses do not conform to the existing zoning or Comprehensive Plan designations. 4. The Forest Lands Zone permits coordination between the State Forest Practices Act and the City Comprehensive Plan and its development regulations. 5. The Zoning Map changes are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 6. The Zoning Map changes are in the public use and interest. 7. The Zoning Map changes reflect changes in circumstances that have occurred since the 1976 Comprehensive Plan was first adopted and has now been replaced with the 1994 Comprehensive Plan, which was updated in 1995. 8. The proposed Zoning Map changes provide an adequate land supply for the various land use classifications consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 9. Plans for low and moderate income housing consistent with the City's and the (ounty's Comprehensive Plans on Clallam County's propety south of Campbell Avenue and east of Porter Street would benefit from the broad public review process required by the Planned Residential Development overlay zone. 10. The existing RS-9 zoning of Area ID #5 will remain in effect, until RMD zoning becomes effective through Planned Residential Development approval, and development consistent with RS-9 requirements is permitted without a PRD. Commissioner King seconded the motion, which passed 5 . O. COMMUNICATIONS. FROM .THE-PUBLIC John Ralston, P.O. Box 1405, Port Angeles, noted that the property he had requested be rezoned was not among those being recommended for rezone by the Planning Commission to the City Council at this time. He asked what his recourse would be. Mr. Collins answered that a public hearing would be conducted by the City Council in November and that he should plan to attend that hearing and present his request to the Council. . . . Planning COmmi$$ion Minute$ . October 25. 1995 Page 9 STAFF REPORTS REPORTS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS The Commission commended staff on their efforts to provide the public a number of opportunities to participate and comment on the proposed zoning map amendments between November, 1994, and the present. The process has served the City well. Commissioner Winters stated that with deepest regret he would be resigning effectively immediately from the Planning Commission. The decision is one which has been thought about at length and is the result of personal needs. He stated that his experience on the Commission has been a very positive experience. Having worked with a number of planning conunissions in his career, he stated that he has never been exposed to, spoken in front of, or been in association with a planning commission that is of the quality and integrity of the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission. The City of Port Angeles and the public is very fortunate to have the group of dedicated staff members working for it as well. He thanked one and all for working so well together for the good of the community. The Commissioners one and all expressed surprise and regret that the City of Port Angeles would 10seCommissioner WlOters' services. The Commission thanked Commissioner Winters for his time, experience and support, and noted that he would he leaving a void that will be hard to fill. Staff thanked Commissioner Winters and wished him well in his endeavors and hoped that he would be in attendance at the February gathering to thank those who serve the City by donation of their time and experience on various boards and commissions. The Commission noted the new spotlight provided by the City Light Department and that it made a great difference in being able to view the display maps used for the meeting. The Chair thanked the Light Department and noted that use of the light will make a big difference in being able to use display maps produced for public hearings to their best advantage. COMMUNICA TIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Jack Glaubert, East Sequim Bay resident, asked that he be allowed to address the '-Commission -at- this point'due 'toethe -resignation -of-Commissioner Winters. Mr. Glaubert stated that he had some concerns regarding the placement of certain lines of designation in the Tidelands with the Inner Harbor being defined including the lots and blocks which is underwater that should be placed on the zoning map. Commissioner Winters' guidance was to be relied on when this issue is addressed and with his resignation, Mr. Glaubert was concerned that the issue would not be understood as welL . . . Planning Commiuion Minule: - October 2S. /99S Page iO Commissioner Winters noted that the City is in the process of creating a new GIS system. Mr. Wmters' survey firm has provided control monumentation with aerials having been flown last spring. The process is underway to do what is being suggested which will result in making what is being used more current, more precise, and to more accurately reflect boundaries and zoning categories including information pertinent and integral to a GIS system for the City. Mr. Glaubert thanked Mr. Winters for this infonnation. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. ~~Q' Brad Collins, Secretary v Qj tndl1 ~7b.i/ Linda Nutter, Chai PREPARED BY: S. Roberds ru W~'''I~I ~-~.~ s:apiay IIDd ..........'S J08dmy Illl~~ (RI_tddtas uaa J___N!NNN~_____j____ . .,... · 01 .. W M - 0 ... . ... . 01 w ~ _ 01. _ ... _ CIl .. W N _:' .,~ " . a CI .... f " , ~ 0 N-__ ---- fl.)N Cft.. ~ ~ "NWW~NN__O"N~Q m~-~NCNG_m~Cft~' :.~ ~ ~a~~owo-~~.~~~~~~~W~~~~_~~N~ ~ Gm~~~-~Cft~~N"lO~...w~a~N~~NCftNO"" f: ~ ::u ::a ::u ::u % :E > " "tJ ::u ::u ::u ::u ::a "tJ ::u "'U ~ ::01::01::0 :01::U ::u ::u :a ::a ::u : ~ ~~~~ o~~x~~~~m~m~~~~x~~~~~~1I ~ ~ ..., ~ ..., !2 S2 00 CD G lOCO" co " ~ ~ ~I~ 0 "U ~ co co co lOt. ~~ CD o :::a i,l l! CI) > en !" .../! N 40 I ''''**''':: 0 .2- " "'U " "'U "'tJ["'tJ " ." " " "'U ." "'U " " " ::u ::u :::a :::af::a :01::U ::u :u :u :u ::a~~1-cS mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~ , ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ooooo~oOOOOO~1 I : :'f: : :~ ~ CD ::J Co 3 '" CD ::J - ~~ ,. ~~~~<<~~~o~~~~~~o~==<===<~~~<~ mmmmmmmm mmmmm moomooommmmmm 0000rn000 00000 0 en 000000' _ ~:. :=::- ~ ~ ~ 'l i f g- i l ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ :;: ~ ~."J! ~ ~ ~ ~ :;: :;: :;: ~:. .O=~O;~~S~~SS~~agcncc~ggiigg ga!agggii~~iiaCtal~=a~ii~aaaaaa = ~C Cl3S~ccJ.~~ ~-iW!~~-----_ ~ ~ f!~!ii99~~~I:i:'~iiiiii " ~ 3..0jl..W~~ CI~ClCI!OO...o. ~ ~ o~!-" !!S~i~~~~~N<<<<<< ~ = ~~~ 00=~ .O.Oooa~ee~. ~ -~=C ==~. =-=--=mmmmmm ~ 0 ~!o<O&!.<.-<= .~mirn'1l'1lrn:2!ZE222 g ..0 ~og = i~..~ ~...ooo ~ G a=.Js...~ S_~~~~~~~~~~o :a = ~i~~-aif ~OD~mD.~~~~~~ ~ ~ .1~3 =10 ~c5255a~ttttt ~ I ~ '~~ ~ .<~o~OGG~<<<<<< C : n '''"' .. ~ Q. ca. Go ...... w 00. ~a. .00 ! = i~ w ~filii~ g $1"" :to. J.I.~ a a m - ~ ~ ~~ i ~ aa ~ OlD '" "V" JlHBX3 ~ OJ r- . " o :L ~ ::::l lQ CD ii' II . ;- ~ ii' 3 CD ~ - !! Q ::::l ~. ~ Con ,-n UO~8~idwl ~a\~Jdmo:> ~UOd ~~SfXdmy~~lddnS vua 01 at 01 01 01 VI Ot Ot Ot .. .. .. .. .. .. .1. . ... W Cot Cot Cot Cot Cot W W W Cot .... CD ..... 0. 01 .. Cot No - 0 UI CIlt .... '" U'I .. WI....I-IO CD C. ... _ en .. w .... _ 0 . N __.... __ ~ ....~Qm -"-NQQ~W-~~Q~QNNQQNW 0 b - 0. 0 CD Q ~ Ga - CD Co fa 0. .... !'-J Gal i:D Ga :.. 0. :. N :.., CD CD 0 b ~ ~ ill ~a~w"""".~~a~Nw~"~CD~mN~_"""~"'''''(Da~ ;u ;u ::u ::u " 0 :u ::u ::u ::u 0 " " 'U 'U "1 "'a "'a "'0 ::u ::u :u ::u 0 ::u ::u ;= ::u ::u ::u. cp en en en m en (I) cp :r x 0 m CD CD ED m ED ED D:I (I) (I) 'PI (I) 0 cP 'P :r cP tpili. H. ., .... .:., .:., .:., " 0 cD co 0 0 :::: " " 'V "'a " " "'a 'V .:., .:., .... .:... .... .... 0 .... ....' : ~ I:,; .': ...~.' 0:- ;:::~... .':-::: .:...._n.,."'. :'~::, o n n n ::u ::0 ::0 ::u :u :a ::u :u :a :u :u ;u ::c/:::u ::u "I'V "lJ " 'U ." ." "lJ " " "'a fa o z z z ~ ~ en CI) 'P en cp cp en en en I/) I/) en en CD CD CD m CD m CD CD CD CD EDg:WlG, o 0 Q, cO ~ .:., .... CD D .:.. .:... .:., .:., ~ cO "'C " " "'C 'V "'U 'V 'V " "'a "'a &wwl..: .......... :::<~:. .. ". . fL.".-. .: 'V sa Q CD N ~~~~=I~=~~~<====~~~=<=:I:I<<<=O<<< omooomoommmoooooooomooommm mmm en en en en en en en en en en0en en;uenen:ac:a:aOo:uoom~>~m~.,,:uoo.,,>><o:u> ~CDS~CDGG_.G_so$~=~osc.cs~~~~.ID~ ~1D~~S<~~<<~~33~30~3c~~~en~ID.=<SID o~sol~=~f~I~3.enlDs_iol~~aig~~ii ~-~~ 1 Irl .can-~a."c ...:la~rl'= IDOIDIDO 00 OO=ID~<nlDlDenn'V.,,~- _ m- 3~330 00 0_~~o.~R~.01D1D~oo3 =2 ~i~~~I~~lli=oen~~gm ~~F~;"''''!IS" =~==~~~~~~~i2g. g-g. ~~;;a~~=~gs o-gglD::UIDID:U::UID=G8 0 =ID<<'V -"3- 1-~..2 .:t _':IC :I ~ = ~ M tJ'j;J < ~ _ g.m 2. fc6 == en iii' ID :i i st .... CD !!. ~I-_- 0 1-".. ..~..CC:l_ SoSS3c.3~""3~ 0 00 ~~~i C8CCSen~S IDID< ~ 00 -en~ a a a .... · 1- .... ;:; - 3 3 S - I....... :u g.3nn.~s. .== ~;:; c:umcp 3~~~ ~a ~~ ~'V a~g~ lD.alDlD~ ~~ ~~ -- 8-'-i =~ ~ ~. .ID ~= ~~.t < ~~ 3'< ---- i 3m.o o 00 .m o 00 n ~= 8 o 00 0 ~~ a 3 33 ~ !!.~ ~ 3 33'~ . c CD CDS... . a ail iii' ID sa. ~ - -- );! m r- ... . .::: .~ "'0 o :. > :I cg CD ii' en N . 3 'a ii' 3 Cl) ::l i Q ~ ~ ~ co (It ~II UO~lduq iuyuaz ;M,~Jdmo;) ~OV UOd ..-u~nl'S 13fmJ 11Il~ ~lddnS vue " ID C) CD W j!:l~ .'- !:!!f~~ ~mm at ... .... .... .... .... ... ... .... .... .... Gt en Gt Gt en en Ie =. 0 _'CD ... Gt "" .. Cot N .. 0 - ,CD ... Ga- Ul .. - Nk~~ w .... .... C) CD .. Ut ClD 0 CD II.) .... U'l Ut 0 !>- U. :... :"" .... .... Co ~ CD .... w :.. ClD 0 :... CD Co ;111 .... w .... Ut CD N .... U'l Ut GI .... N CD CD m CD N U'l .. ::u ::u ::u ::u '1J (') r- ~ :::u ::u '1J "'tJ I I r- '1J "'tJ " " '1J '1J rp en en rp CD Z en en OJ CD OJ CD to CD OJ OJ I . '1J .... . " "'tJ " " " '1J '1J '1J '1J 'jill-- .... .... co co co f.. 1m !~!E; .....-.-................. ;:::::::::;:;-:~;::~:::~: :'~:-:..:-:.:.:-:.~:.:.: '~''''''+'.'.. ...- ".~.' :'.::::~~::::~:::::::~. ::::::::~:::::;~:::~::.; ::0 . .:.:..,:..~+..._.... (') " ::0 ::0 ::0 '1J '1J (') '1J Z :t (') (') (') 0 " " (') "[" ::0 ~:rJmz :t 0 CD Z en rp OJ OJ )> m )0 )0 )> Z to OJ )> mm is f~:lit:~" 0 "'tJ C I " " " "'tJ " '1J" .... .... ::u ::;::;:.~l~~ OJ " ~;i:~:t~~=-i r{~~im2~! *:;:$::~~~:~~'::::: ~ ::J ~ = = = -< ni -< -< -< = -< ~ -< -< = = :::I ::J ::J :::I :E]1fr%: ;myu,'t) 0 0 0 0 m m m m 0 m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~;~" (I) (I) en CIJ en en fI) (I) (I) (I) en ;: K u.,. ...."'... " ~~'K:: - :: en " ::u ~ ::tI ~ m )> ::0 ~ ::u "tJ m a' m 3: :t " en (') ,1 ~ ::tI CD CD m Q. 0- m CD iii' 0 ~ c: 0 0 CD ~ 0 < i < ::L N a < S!t < ::J m !i !/l. en ~ !d ::J c:r f ::J 5' iii ::J - CD 0- Z CD l z f6 =r 5' ~ 0 i c>> CD CD CD CD 0 c: - .., 'l} 0 =r Q. C) 3 e. a !: (') n =' 0 c ! 0 c: 0 3 = 0 ti 0 c ~ f - s- o :;- = 8 8 g CD III ~ ~ ~ rg =r Q. ~ 0.. :::I a. ~ i- m 3 3 - I'< c ij CD m !Z ~ I !a. a 3 3 .., n ~fI " " " :::I ::J g 0- :::I ::L at CD 0 .i iD iD 3 en m Dr 0 Dr S- a. c: ~ ;: - ? :::I Dr -3 = c: c: ::I. <" c . :: = m !! =r . i&l;;;.0l;:: S ~ Xl c: - 3 ti~;:::::~~@ 3 Q. C - g. 0 0' CD 0 i c c c: c: ~ en a ID en ; -8 ~~ i :::I i " .CD (II OJ 0 CD CD ~ III CD 5"N5 "." g. a . en "'tJ CD 3 a ~,"", l~ i ~ 9. ID - ~ at ... ~ .., !!. l '. ::J ~. CD ~. - ~ 0 0 : - 0 CD ~i~1 3 ~ ~ Ii ~~m .:: ~.n \ ;:-~'. +::: i! CD r- m ~. "tJ o ::I. )> :;) lD lD nr en N o ~. 3 '0 Cii 3 lD ::J a 0" :;) ~. (Q Ut EXHIBIT "B" . Area ill Existin~ ~ Change Now Comments 1 RS-9 RMD Yes Vacant available 2 RS-9 RMD Yes Vacant available 3 RS-9 RMD Yes Vacant available 4 RS-9 RMD Yes Vacantavailable 5 RS-9 RMD Yes Vacant available 10 RS-7 RMD Yes Vacant available or existing development 11 RS-7 RMD No Existing development : 12 PBP RMD No PUD Property . 22 CA PBP Yes Ravine ESA 32 II.. PBP No Wetland, marine bluff, future . commercial 56 RS-7 CN No Vacant available not fronting 101 57 RS-7 eN Yes Fronting 101 . t-II UO~~fdmJ j~~ydmoJ ~ UOd lWI&w'SlS =edmr ~ J8l-fddrlg vue 1111.(.' .i "'>bi;:,;;;;o' 'oN'^' ,. iW=i ~NN~~~~N~__________ ~. ~~-~.WN_O~~~.~.~N_O._~_..WN_~ . "V II) Q CD - , t ." . 1. 0 N-__ ---_ NN ~.. ~~ ~ !'- ~ ~ ~ !O ~ ~ - eft P !'- ~ :'" !'t W ~ ="" cD !O ~ ~ ~ !D - ~ :'" ~ ~11"'. .~_ )> (DCD..,...OWO_. ......~-..... UlUI. W........CDN-CIl....N. .... . .... (D CD UI UI VI - UI ..,. .... .... It.) ..... CD ~ .... w .... CD .... N VI Ul It.) ~ N CD .. ..:; ,! ,;::;: ~~~~%%>"V"V~~~~~"V~"V~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ; ~ mmm0 O~~%0m~0m~m0000X~0~0~~~ m ~ .:., .:., .:.. 0_ C_ 0 C cD cD CD cD "V CD "V ~ .:... .:... .:... 0 "V cD CD cb CD cot. ~ m n ~ . m >~ N . I ~ "V ""0 "V "V "V "V "tJ "V ""0 ""0 "V " ""0 ""0 ""0 " ~ ::a ~ ::af::a ~ ::a ~ ::u ::u ::u (Q mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~~~~~~~~~~~ , "V ""0 ""0""0 "V "V "V "tJ""U""O""O "V"V"V"UCOCCCCCCCCO ~ fi;;:- .itl ~ CD :J a. 3 ~ CD :J - ~. en ~ ~m -< ~ -or( -or( -< -or( 0:' -or( -< -< -< -< :'0 -< :I :I -<:I :I ::a -< -or( -< -< ~ -or(' m mmmmmm mmmmm moomooommmmmm 000m0000 mmcncnen en 0 000cnm0 :~ " .,) >cn~"U~0m~~QQ::U::u"U"Um<~m~~~<<<<<<~ ~SCD.~':I..COID.IDID~IDS~SS.lDlD.lDlDlD~ .g=~OI~~S~~~~~~s~=nc==~gg~g~~ ~-lcag~~~i~i~g~i!~!laiCil~~!~!a!!!!~ - -3 == ~=c-- 1D~~~lD.1D1D1D1I) Sl 3:!I:li i 5f~ =~!o io ~i aa&&i5.a: -: -a 3ii!!Ciill"';~.~"V~~!......: ~ !. CD~5- ~:lla~.<~-~~N<<<<<~ ~ - :I~~"Uc: n~~G ~c~cog~~~~ID= ~ -0_ -= CD--=--OlDlDlDlDlDlD & 0 ~!<OAA<<: ~~mCD00c~~E222 Q CD lD0.~OO.CD:I CDCD~~~~~CD.CDCDCDO ~ i a=.mii..~ g-~~~~~~o~ooo ::u = ~i~~-Cili~ :I~m~mm.~~~~~~ ~ ~ .=j3 ==. ~~S~3$1~~t~~tt ~ ~ ~ ~ . .<CDO~.CD~<<<<<< c: i : i I; . $ ~ :; ~ :;: n. . . . . . ~. ! = ~~ = S~!l&&~ . o ~~ ~~. ..~ I a ~i~ :I ~~ = m mlD .... ,... """'*.... CD .. * .~ :< t! * :~ >> " '. '~ ...... ~ ~ .!i -* "V,,-.llHHX3 ~ , 1J c ~ >' = IQ CD iD "" ~ cO 3" ." if 3 CD ::J - a c = Je. ~ ~ CD tit ~.n UO~=tduq~~o:> ardUVlJOd ~s l:J8daq ~ ~rddns lJ1tI<I ~ II) Ie CD No , ,. :.:.:~; UI at 01 01 at 01 UI UI UI . .... .. ... .. t .. .. .... .. Cot .. W W Cot W W Cool Cot W N GO ... en 01 .... Cot N .. 0 CA . ... en UI W N .. 0 CO . ... .. at .... Cot N .. 0 CO . .. '-.: ' N ... ... ..., ... .- CD ... Ut 0 QI ... ... .- N 0 0 CD W .... ... ..., !:>> en 0 No N 0 C No ~ 0 < b ... CD b CD b .- m Q I ~ CD N m e- m CD ;.. N :.... m Co 0 (:) en w ~ ..~ ... ... .. .:=;:; CD CD Us Cool " " ;.. en CII t:O W en .. CD CD CD QI No CD ... " ... en .. ..., Co Co ~f. ::u ::u ::0 ::0 "lJ 0 ::0 ::0 ::u ::u 0 "lJ "V "lJ "lJ 'TJ 'TJ ~ 'TJ ::0 ::0 ::u ::0 0 :a :u F ::u ;:c ::0' rp rp cp rp OJ C/) en rp J: J: g m OJ m OJ OJ m OJ m en rp C/) en 0 cp rp J: cp CPr "'D 0 I 0 C "'0 'TJ "V "'D 'TJ 'TJ " " I I I C : ..... .... " .... (Q CO ... ... .... .... ..... ..... ..... .....'. r- ;;:;, : :;('~ r~~1i ~-.. iittn 0 0 0 0 ;:c ::u :::0 ;:c ;:c ::u ;:c ;:c ;:c ::u ::u ::u ::u ::u ::u "V " " 'TJ "lJ "V " " "'D "'0 ~I 0 z z Z J: J: C/) CIJ cp rp rp rp rp C/) en C/) rp en en m m OJ tD OJ OJ OJ tEl OJ CD C C I I I I I I I "V "V " ." "V "'D ""D 'TJ 'TJ " CO CO ..... .... ... CO CO ... ..... .... ... ... CO i : :::J -< ~ :::J = ~ ~ = ~ -< ~ = = = ~ = = = :I -< :I = :I -< -< -< :I -< ~ -< 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 m m m 0 m m en (I) en en en en en C/) en en en C/) .- .. ., ., ~ .. ;.: ~~ "! : en ::u en en ::u c :a :;u 0 0 ::u 0 0 m :r > 3: m "'T1 -0 :a 0 0 -0 > > ~ 0 :::a 6: ~ CD ~ a CD CD CD CD CD III CD C 0 Ci' ~ :::: a: Ci' s. c CD c ~ II) ~ .a: (II II) m < < < < < < < ~ 3 CD S!: < ;;- ;::l < < .: 3 =r Q. 3 c II) II) II) CD ~ CD CD if t II i' t i II: 3 3 CD i 0' II: it 0 ~ g Dr i S" g ~'.. CD ~ ID CD Q. - = CD : .,. - "'T1 -n n III c = - en :::::l " C 0 CD CD CD = ::s ~ I ::s 0 0 0 n = - <' ~ I - - - II) II) ID 0 0 0 0 2. ~ S 0 g. m 0 " ~ )( - - m 2 3 ! 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ S?. CD ;;. ~ II) i 0 0 3 = ~ .;c oC ~ i ~ II :r 0 CD ?l- F II) ~ < CD 0 en 6 S?. en )( ~ ." "lJ ::::t, a 'tI :I ~ :I :I ." :::r "lJ ." :r :r ." ! 0 9- g. ![ "lJ ; Ii m m :I m i .i ~ ii" ii" m iD a ::r S" ;; " ;. ;;. CD rp ::I ? .g ::0 ::0 :::a <" 0 en 0 < < 3 ~ J: .= .-:J rp rp ~ S?. e. CD :::::l &l II: II) c c cr ..., !!. 01 GI g. ;;. II: II ~ CD S - ~ ~ 3 0 3 3 ... ... C :::::l 5' 0 3 ::u 0 0 0 := en - c II) ~ c c c .a m- ~ I>> 2. 01 8 ~ ~ -8 0 0 S !I' ~ a CiI CiI S. ~ 8 ::u : 9- 3 g. g. 01 CIJ CIl CD at ::I C ::u en cp 3 a a a a 10 'tI 'tI i I>> CD .... I>> ~ m < = a .. 18 ... ... ... ... Cil Ai' ;; 8 5" en c a. ::I ::I cp := I CD !!. 01 .. :s. 3 <" - - - II 3 en .. - 0 0 0 0 0 CII (II 8 0 0 0 a. :I 0 0 0 0 !!. :I 3 3 3 ~ !!. - - i 5" 3 3 3 c GI CD CD ~ GI a. a a. ii' !!. !!. !!!. ::I i ...-. ----- ~ . ~ m . " o ;::l > :::l lC CD Ci' en ~ 3 '0 tD 3 CD ::J a 5' = . to) ~ en ----"- ~II UO!l2J~ld1DJ Suruoz ~;,adwo::> ~pSuy lJOd m;w;nwns ~8dWJ pn~H {8llJ;m;IddnS \JlUQ ." ~ lQ CD ~ <::"<'<l! ~.:.;.-:-::~ .-: .~ ~:}fu1!@.: ClII .... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... ~ en en en en en en ,:: en en =1 0 CO ClII ..... eft VI .... W N - 0 CO .CD .... .Cft eft ... Cot - 0 - ~I ~ .... ... 0 c>> ... UI c>> 0 CO N - (It u. c ~ u. . ~ - - CO 0) fo ..... W . Q) g . iJ:I CO " W ... UI CD i\) .. <n UI Q. " i\) 0) (II Ot It.) UI ... ;::u ;::u ~ ~ "'0 n ;= s: ;::u ~ "'0 "'0 s: :I: ;= "'0 "'0 "'0 ." "'0 "'0 en en en cp OJ Z (/) (J) OJ m OJ tD OJ m m tD . . I ." ...., , ." ." ." ." "'0 " " " " *imi: " " co co (Q ~111;j; :::~:::;:~::;;-:~:;:;::~: f~l$f~?~~ .......-...~.r.....:... :::::::::::::::;:::::~:::' ~:::;;:::;~:;::~~~::;: u..............+.... ;:0 (') 1J ~ ;:0 ::0 1J "'tJ n "'tJ 3: :I: ~ (') ~ n "'tJ "'tJ n ." ." ~l-:i;-II::~ z 0 CD :I: f/) en CD CD )0- CD )0- Z CD CD )0- m CD 0 ." 0 I . "'U ." ." ." ." "'U ." " :a JJ:@N CD 51 ." rli ~ -< :::I ~ :::I -< -< -< -< -< ~ -< ~ -< -< ~ ~ :::I :::I ~ 0 m 0 0 0 m m m m m 0 m m m 0 0 0 0 0 f/) en en (J) 0 (J) f/) 0 (J) (J) en {"'--fJi:. en ." ;::u ~ ;u ~ m )0- ;::u ~ ;;0 ." CD ~ ~ 3: :I: ." en (') ~I ~ ~ CD CD ~ Q. 0' ~ CD iii" 0 I: 0 0 CD ~ C < ~ < ~ N ~ < ~ < ~ m i i {II ~. sa. ~ 0" i" :::I 5' iii ~ - (II 0" :t CD i ~ :t S" ~ S" 3' I: =- 0 :g ,.wnu;, CD (II CD (II & 0 ~ '11 0 :::r lQ I: lQ lQ 3 m - n ~ fl n n c- o c6' I: n - ~ ~ rg 2" S" :;- {II S 8 g CD 3 :::I 0 0 ~ ! 0 (I>> ~ i i :=; ~ :::r c. ~ Q. :::I :::I ~ ~ ~ c iD at 3 3 Ci' Q. m C' ~ sa. ~ a. 3 3 ~ n ~ g " "tI 0" ~ ~ " CD (II 0 .i iii' iD 3 (II III iii" (') iii' a a c ~ =- - :::I :::I Dr .g ~ I: C =- < c - ::: ~ !!. !!. :::r S 3 :::I (II I - c 9- 0 6' Q. CD 0 iiJ c c c c ~ {II a ~ ." (II .~ en ~ '*....~!?<t..,. (; :::I (jJ m n CD CD CD li1@ (II ~ ~ g. a en ." (II 3 aH:-?;:'':;:. ~ ~ - sa ~ litjl! ~ ~ (I>> ~ ~ !!. lQ I CD :::I - ~ 0 (') - 0 CD 3 ~ :,j ~ W'%i~ m1il~J ;;! m . " o =- )0- :::I lQ CD CD en N o - ~. 3" ~ CD 3 (II ~ i 0- :::I ~. ;a UI EXHIBIT "B" . Area ID Existing New Change Now Comments 1 RS-9 RMD Yes Vacant available 2 RS-9 RMD Yes Vacant available 3 RS-9 RMD Yes Vacant available 4 RS-9 RMD Yes Vacantavailable 5 RS-9 RMD Yes Vacant available 10 RS-7 RMD Yes Vacant available or existing development 11 RS-7 RMD No Existing development : 12 PBP RMD No PUD Property 22 CA PBP Yes Ravine ESA . 32 IL PBP No Wetland, marine bluff, future . commercial 56 RS-7 CN No Vacant available not fronting 101 57 RS-7 eN Yes Fronting 101 . . . -- PLEASE SIGN IN CITY OF PORT ANGELES Planning Commission Attendance Roster Meeting Date: & Me ci:i; L 9Q. '> -