The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 05/09/2006 Utility Advisory Committee Public Works Conference Room Port Angeles, W A 98362 May 9,2006 3:00 P.M. AGENDA I. Call To Order II. Roll Call III. Approval Of Minutes For April 25, 2006 IV. Late Items V. Discussion Items A. Benefit Dump Day B. Conservation Program Status Report C. Stormwater Phase II Response D. Stormwater Fees VI. Next Meeting Date - June 13, 2006 VII. Adjournment 5/4/06 N :\UAC\Final\042506.wpd ( UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE S.9-0(p GUEST SIGN UP SHEET PRINT NAME ORGANIZATION ?t/ 0'- N: \PWKS \LIGHT\ CONS \ CATE \ SIGNUP. wpd cJ, , , V UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Special Meeting Port Angeles, Washington April 25, 2006 ,,/ L Call to Order: Chairman Reed called the meeting to order at 3:11 p.m. IL Roll Call: Members Present: Chairman Reed, Orville Campbell, Betsy Wharton, Grant Munro, Karen Rogers Members Absent: None Staff Present: William Bloor (4:40), Glenn Cutler, Scott McLain, Gary Kenworthy (4:40), Mike Puntinney (4:40), Tom McCabe (4:40), Teresa Pierce, Cate Rinehart Others Present: Jim Haguewood - One Group Mike Doherty - Citizen IlL Approval of Minutes: Chairman Reed asked if there were any corrections to the meeting minutes of April 11, 2006. Councilmember Wharton moved to approve the minutes. Councilman Munro seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. IV. Strategic Planning Session Jim Haguewood, One Group Chairman, summarized the previous meeting noting a number of concepts that had been identified. These concepts included planning for the future, government performance excellence, health and safety, live and work, and partnerships. Ideas and opinions were exchanged regarding these issues. It was noted that the next phase would be for City staff and Council to assess the information that had been gathered, prioritize them, and develop strategies. V. Discussion Items: A. Storm water Utility Rates Deferred to the May 9th meeting. 1 I UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE April 25, 2006 VI. Adjorn to Executive Session - 4:39 pm Return to regular session - 5: 13 pm VIL Discussion Items Continued: B. Washington Department Of Fish And Wildlife Use Of City Facilities ) Scott McLain, Deputy Director for Power Systems, explained that during the demolition ofthe Elwha River dams a request had been made to rear Elwha fall Chinook in Morse Creek until about 2014, at which time the fish would be reintroduced in the Elwha River. The City would be compensated for water from the diversion pipeline. There was a brief discussion. Councilman Munro moved to recommend staff work toward a formal agreement for allowing WDFW to utilize City property to raise Elwha Chinook salmon during demolition of the Elwha dams. Chairman Reed seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. C. Landfill Disposal Of Derelict Buildings And Structures Tom McCabe, Solid Waste Superintendent, advised that based ona March 22,2006 capacity assessment ofthe remaining volume in the Port Angeles Landfill, there will be some unused capacity upon its closure December 31, 2006. Construction debris could fill this space. A discussion followed. Councilman Munro moved to recommend City Council allow up to a maximum of 20,000 cubic yards of construction debris from derelict buildings and structures to be sold at a reduced rate as set by the Director of Public Works and Utilities. Chairman Reed seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. VIIL Next meeting date: May 9,2006 IX. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 5:39 p.m. Chairman Reed Cate Rinehart, Administrative Specialist IT N :\PWKS\LIGH1\CONS\CA TE\042506meet. wpd 2 ~~RT.N'TGELES WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMO DATE: May 9,2006 To: UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM: Tom McCabe, Superintendent, Solid Waste Division SUBJECT: Benefit Dump Day Summary: The City of Port Angeles sponsors an annual Benefit Dump Day for all Clallam County residents. This year's event was postponed due to multiple construction projects at the Port Angeles LandfilL The scheduled date for the Benefit Dump Day is June 11,2006 from 9:00 am to 3 :00 pm. Recommendation: Forward a favorable recommendation to City Council for the annual Benefit Dump Day to be held on Sunday June 11,9:00 am to 3:00 pm, at the Port Angeles Landfill with a minimum $5 donation. Background/Analysis: The Solid Waste Division sponsors an annual Benefit Dump Day for all Clallam County residents. This year's event is scheduled for Sunday, June 11, from 9:00 am to 3:00 pm. with the same restrictions on dumping as in previous years. Dumping will be restricted to one load per household with vehicle sizes up to a 3/4 ton pick-up truck or a trailer measuring 5 ft. x 8 ft. There is also a maximum limit of four tires and four appliances per customer. Commercial haulers are not allowed. Large appliances, metals, and tires are collected for recycling. In the past, a customer had the choice of donating either five cans of food or $5.00 that was then given to the Port Angeles Food Bank. Mikki Saunder, Food Bank Director, met with city staff and asked for the City to consider eliminating the 5 cans of food and only taking cash donations. Staff supports Mikki Saunder's recommendation. It is noted that this event will be continued next year at the Port Angeles Transfer Station after the landfill closes. ~ORTANGEIiIS WAS H I N G TO. N, U. S. A. Public Works & Utilities Department May 9, 2006 Re: Urban Services Standards and Guidelines Dear Madam or Sir: I need your assistance prior to finalizing an update of the City of Port Angeles's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines (USS&G). Your comments and recommendations are desired. I am holding off publishing the next update to the USS&G until June 2006. This is your opportunity to provide me with your input. In 1995, the City Council adopted the Urban Service Ordinance as an element of our compliance with the Growth Management Act. The ordinance provided forCity departments to write standards and guidelines in their respective areas. As a result, USS&G were developed and put into use that same year by the Public Works and Utilities Department. The Standards combined various City ordinan'ces, state standards and requirements, policies and procedures, and standardized drawings in the areas of permitting, plan submittal and review, water, wastewater, transportation, clearing and grading, stormwater management and solid waste. Many changes to these Standards were issued in the following years due to, among others, (1) new state regulations and City ordinances, (2) material improvements effecting roads and utilities, (3) conflicts and ambiguities within the Standards themselves, and (4) a desire to streamline the development and permitting processes. The Public Works and Utilities staff have completed their review and updated the . Standards, keeping in mind the aforementioned changes and a gesire to convert them into 'a more user friendly format (MS Word and a more current version of Autocad). This will assist engineers, surveyors, developers, real estate professionals and just about anyone else that has a need or desire to make improvements to property/not only within the City, but also inside the City's Urban Growth Area boundaries. I am inviting you and other interested parties to comment between now and May 31, 2006 on the draft update to the USS&G, which are available for review and downloading from the City's website at: https://cityofpa.us/urbanStandards.htm Other than incorporating changes already made to the USS&G in the years between 1995 and 2006, they do not vary much from the original. Most of the changes you will notice are formatting changes; not substantive ones. If you have any questions or Phone: 360-417-4805 / Fax: 360-417-4542 Website: www.cityofpa.us / Email: publicworks@cityofpa.us . 321 East Fifth Street - P.O. Box 1150/ Port Angeles, WA 98362-0217 .. suggestions to further improve these Standards, please contact Stephen Sperr, Engineering Managerat either ssperr@citvofpa.us or 417-4821., .. ~~e~'L-.(<-- .!-,.. G~utler, P.E. Director, Public Works and Utilities Department DATE: To: FROM: SUBJECT: WASHINGTON, U.S.A. UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE May 9, 2006 Utility Advisory Committee Larry Dunbar, Power Resources Manager Conservation Program Status Report Summary: A status report will be presented on the City's energy conservation programs from June 2001 through January 2006. Recommendation: The Status report will be presented with no action requested. Backf!round/Analvsis: On April 12, 2001 the City Council authorized the Director ofPllblic Works & Utilities to implement a conservation program that qualifies for the Bonneville Power Administration (BP A) Conservation and Renewables Discount (C&RD). The conservation program has been in operation since June 1,2001 and offers electric utility customers rebates for energy efficient building improvements, appliances and lighting. The C&RD concludes September 30, 2006. Staff is developing a new program to meet the requirements ofBP A~s Post- 2006 requirements, which should be available to electric utility customers this summer. Below is a summary ofthe program achievements through January 31,2006. Please see the reverse side for a summary of the rebates for energy conservation measures that are currently available. Conservation Pro2ram Achievements From June 1,2001 To January 31, 2006 If. Jobs/Units Total Cost City Rebate Savin2s1 C&RD Heat Pump 164 $1,172,551.57 $248,136.40 1,051,914 $325,645.11 Window 628 $1,721,087.12 $374,042.58 885,53C $459,057.82 Water Heater 513 $162,324.56 $24,565.00 114,153 $27,008.49 Dishwasher 76 $48,318.56 $1,815.00 9,044 $1,845.28 Clothes Washer 506 $512,408.55 $56,630.00 252,998 $73,676.40 Refriaerator 9 $8,697.99 $697.17 8,236 $987.39 Li~htina 518 $76,174.98 $51,322.57 205,369 $56,824.84 A.ttic Insulation 112 $156,702.34 $88,314.24 168,762 $91,099.97 Floor Insulation 108 $151,892.61 $93,328.95 207,965 $106,416.10 Wall Insulation 122 $203,089.89 $178,234.07 327,899 $228,162.77 Infiltration Control 7 $3,234.71 $2,893.39 7,644 $3,447.23 Renewables 2 $48,890.70 $3,601.62 8,660 $3,592.50 RD&D Proiects 1 $2,792.24 $2,792.24 N/A , $2,792.24 Super Good Cents 20 $23,660.00 $18,000.00 48520 $23,660.00 Irotals 2,786 $4,291,825.83 $1,144,373.21 3,296,694 $1,404,216.14 I BPA projected annual energy savings in kWh Summa 0 Available Rebates or Janua 2006 Available Single-Family MamljliCiured Multi-Family Small Improvements Homes Homes Homes Commerciai $500 $500 N/A Up to $0.60 (HSPF 8.0-8.5) (HSPF 8.0-8.5) per sq. ft. Heat pump Retail Buildings $1,000 $1,000 N/A Up to $0.45 (HSPF ~8.6 ) (HSPF ~8.6 ) per sq. ft. Office Buildings $3.50 per sq. ft. $3.50 per sq. ft. $3.50 per sq. ft. $3.50 per sq. ft. Windows $10 per air inlet $10 per air inlet $10 per air inlet $0.12 per sq ft $0.24 per sq ft Air-sealing (dependent on the (dependent on the N/A N/A amount of air- amount of air- leakage reduced) leakage reduced) Wall insulation Up to $0.75 per sq. N/A Up to $0.75 per Up to $0.75 per sq. ft. sq. ft. ft. Attic insulation Up to $0.75 Up to $0.49 Up to $0.75 Up to $0.75 per sq. ft. Per sq. ft. per sq. ft. per sq. ft. Floor insulation Up to $0.75 Up to $0.75 Up to $0.75 Up to $0.75 per sq. ft. Per sq. ft. per sq. ft. per sq. ftoo ENERGY $2.00 each $2.00 each $2.00 each N/A ST AR@ labeled 5 to 10 watts 5 to 10 watts 5 to 10 watts compact $3.00 each $3.00 each $3.00 each fluorescent lamp 11 to 60 watts 11 to 60 watts 11 to 60 watts ENERGY $30.00 per fixture $30.00 per fixture $30.00 per fixture $15.00 -$165.00 STAR@ labeled (limit of 12) (limit of 12) (limit of 12) pe~ fixture2 lighting fixture ENERGY $40.00 per fixture $40.00 per fixture $40.00 per fixture N/A STAR@ labeled (limit of 2) (limit of 2) (limit of 2) torchiere lamp ENERGY $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 N/A ST AR@ labeled (Must have an (Must have an (Must have an clothes washer electric water electric water electric water heater) heater) heater) ENERGY $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 N/A ST AR@ labeled (Must have an (Must have an (Must have an dish-washer electric water electric water electric water wI EF ~.76 heater) heater) heater) ENERGY $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 N/A ST AR@ Refrigerator Electric water N/A heater 10-year $25.00 20-year $50.00 Solar water Up to $1,000 Up to $1,000 Up to $1,000 N/A heater (dependent on (dependent on (dependent on collector size) collector size) collector size) Photo voltaic $500 per kW $500 per kW $500 per kW N/A 1 Must be an office or retail space 5,000 sq. ft. or less. 2 Purchase of Conservation Agreement - Limited Standard Offer-Plus. DATE: To: FROM: SUBJECT: ~RWGBLBS WASHINGTON, U.S.A. UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMO May 9,2006 UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Gary W. Kenworthy P.E., Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Comment Letter to DOE, NPDES Phase II Stormwater Permit Summary: DOE, through May 19,2006, will receive comments on the final draft ofthe NPDES Phase II Stormwater Permit. The City responded to the first draft last August and requested reconsideration of our being part of Phase II. In the final draft the City remains designated as a Phase II participant. Recommendation: Review and comment on the attached letter, Council action is not required. Background! Analysis: The City of Port Angeles remains listed as a Regulated Small Municipal Small Storm Sewer System (Small MS4) "Bubble City" in the final draft ofthe NPDES Stormwater Phase II. The "Bubble City" means that a final determination has not been made by the Department of Ecology (DOE). The City has formally requested removal from the list since we are covered by Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) permits, Landfill NPDES permits, and Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) NPDES discharge permits. In addition the City has no control over stormwater discharges passing through the City from the County and the surrounding Urban Growth Area. These concerns were provided with our comments on the preliminary draft last August. DOE, through May 19,2006, will receive comments on the final draft. DOE's current schedule for final permit issuance is this September. This could be delayed due to the volume and nature of the comments received. At an American Public Works Association (APW A) stormwater managers meeting, a DOE staff member indicated that a December issuance would be more realistic. Comment Letter to DOE Page 2 May 9,2006 Ifwe are unsuccessful in our appeal, our inclusion as a Phase II City will not be official until the final permit is issued. We will then be required to submit an application or Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage under the permit within 30 days after the effective date. Impacts of Phase II inclusion will include adoption ofthe Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, adoption of revised stormwater ordinances required for compliance, added engineering and planning staff for compliance, and increased stormwater rates or other funding to support these unfunded mandate requirements. Staff has prepared a second letter requesting that DOE reconsider listing the City is being prepared for the City Manager's Signature. A draft copy ofthe letter is attached for UAC review and comments. Copies ofthe final letter will be provided to UAC and Council Members. N:\UAC\Final\NPDES II Comment Letter-a.doc May 10, 2006 DRAFT [Commentl] Department of Ecology Water Quality Program Municipal Stormwater Permits P.O. Box 47696 Olympia, WA 98504-7696 RE: NPDES Phase II Stormwater Permit, City of Port Angeles Comments The City of Port Angeles is very concerned with continuing to being designated by the Department of Ecology as a City that will be regulated under the NPDES Phase II Stormwater Permit. The City of Port Angeles has concerns regarding the basis for our designation. Our specific concerns are related to our City's size, surrounding area, financial ability, and existing regulatory permits regarding water quality in our community. We have additional concerns that are in line with those of the Association of Washington Cities and the American Public Works Association Storm Water Managers. These were provided with our comments on the first draft. The City of Port Angeles does not meet the size and density criteria to be included as a Phase II City even if the surrounding UGA population is included. DOE staff has confirmed that the Phase II would cover only the area within the City limits would be included under Phase II and not those areas in the surrounding UGA and Clallam County areas. In this area limitation the City would be required to accept unregulated stormwater flows from the adjacent UGA and Clallam areas that are in our watershed. This will put the City in the unacceptable position of trying to work with adjacent jurisdictions without the authority to require compliance. This will require added work and costs to comply with Phase II. Phase II areas should be defined by UGA limits and watershed limits. The City of Port Angeles should not be included in Phase II until this issue is resolved. The City of Port Angeles is on the 303.d list contained in the 2002-2004 Water Quality Assessment of Washington. The listing is for exceeding parameters for dissolved oxygen in our harbor and fecal coliform in two creeks that traversing the City that originate in Clallam County. NPDES II designation will not resolve either listing. The dissolved oxygen is from past mill practices and log rafting debris. The fecal coliform listings are a County Department of Health issue. The Streams listed originate outside of the City. The City does not allow septic systems except for those limited areas that cannot reasonably access the City's sewer system. These few areas are permitted and regulated the Clallam County Health Department. The only endangered species listing is that for Chinook Salmon in the harbor, not the streams. The City should not be included in Phase II for being on the 303d list since we have no regulatory control over the problems listed. The City of Port Angeles, being a CSO City, is already heavily regulated by DOE and is pursuing an aggressive program to meet the requirements of our permit. Our CSO reduction plan, following discussions with DOE staff, has been submitted to DOE for review. The plan, as submitted and tentatively accepted, proposes a $32 to $42 million dollar capital program to meet the requirement of one CSO event per discharge point per year by the year 2015, based on availability of sufficient grant and low interest loan funding. The costs of meeting the CSO compliance schedule will push the City's wastewater rates well beyond the EP A's affordability limits. The added unfunded mandate costs to comply with NPDES Phase II should not be added to our rate payers burden. The City of Port Angeles should not be included in Phase II until funding is provided by State or Federal agencies. In addition to the CSO permitting requirements, the City of Port Angeles complies with water quality permitting requirements of Federal ESA, Corps of Engineers, Tribal, DNR, WDF HPA, DOE, Shorelines, Critical Areas and other mitigation measures resulting from SEP AlNEP A. The City of Port Angeles is again requesting DOE to reconsider designation of our City as part of Phase II. Weare already heavily regulated in regards to water quality and cannot afford the additional costs to implement Phase II. Imposing Phase II on the City of Port Angeles will not accelerate the rate of water quality clean up. It will only add another unfunded layer of deadlines, monitoring, testing, and staffing that the City's residents cannot afford. In addition, the NPDES Phase II requirements proposed by DOE will essentially require adoption of the DOE Stormwater Manual which was originally intended to be used only for guidance and not as. a requirement. Sincerely, Mark Madsen City Manager cc: Council, UAC I DATE: To: FROM: SUBJECT: ~RT,NlGBLBS WAS H I N G TON, U. S. A. UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMO May 9, 2006 UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Gary W. Kenworthy P.E., Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Stormwater Utility Rates Summary: It has been three years since formation ofthe Stormwater Utility and direction is needed in development of programs and funding. Recommendation: Discuss Stormwater Utili o tions. Background/Analysis: The Stormwater Utility was created (Ordinance 3151) in 2003. During the discussions regarding the Stormwater Utility it was noted that the rates would be reevaluated in three years, our normal utility review period. The current monthly Stormwater Utility Rates are $3.00 per month ($36 Annually) for single-family and duplex property and $3.00 per 4,000 square feet unit of impervious area, with a ten unit/$30.00 cap ($360 Annually), for commercial/multiple property. These fees are collected by the County along with property taxes and in 2005 generated revenues of $357,000 (1490 commercial properties, $124,500, 35%; 6510 residential properties, $232,500, 65%). It was directed by City Council that the funds for the Stormwater Utility be utilized primarily for Capital Improvement Projects to reduce flooding and Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) impacts along with endangered species act (ESA) training for staff The charges for services (County processing fees (1 %), utility taxes (8%), training, assessments, professional services) reduce the projected annual funds available for capital projects, in 2006 dollars, to approximately $310,000. This is the same value noted in the 2003 Council Memo for the Stormwater Utility formation. The major stormwater project completed using Stormwater Utility funds since the establishment was the Crown Park Stormwater Improvements CSO reduction project completed in 2005. This year the Lincoln Street Storm Drain (4th to ih) CSO reduction project, Aerial Mapping, Catch Basin Improvements, and Valley Creek Erosion Control are the scheduled projects. The projects for 2007 have not been selected. A matrix of proposed projects prepared in 2003 for the formation of the Stormwater Utility is attached along with the proposed 2006-20012 Capital Facilities Project (CFP) list for Stormwater. Stormwater Utility Rates May 9,2006 Page 2 DOE will decide on the looming specter ofNPDES Municipal Stormwater Phase II this year. The City of Port Angeles is currently included as a Phase II community. Ifwe are not successful in being excluded this will result in the need for additional staffto implement, inspect, monitor, and report in accordance with the DOE requirements which will include all those in the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. This unfunded mandate will be a significant impact to the City and developers. We are currently reviewing the final draft ofthe Phase II permits and will be providing comments to DOE prior the May 19,2006 deadline. Our Stormwater residential monthly rates are low in comparison to similar Cities in western Washington as shown in the following table: City Monthly Residential Rate System Development Charge Port Angeles $3.00 None Anacortes $3.00 $1,126.00 Blaine $4.00 $200.00 Bainbridge $5.00 None Shelton $5.00 None Mount Vernon $6.00 None Port Townsend $6.00 None Gig Harbor $7.00 None Friday Harbor $7.00 $286.00 Edmonds $7.00 $428.00 Poulsbo $8.00 None The rates and system development charges shown in the table above are based on A WC 2004 Survey. The A WC survey is updated every two years and the 2006 survey will be available this coming August. It is clear that with NPDES Phase II additional administration, engineering and planning staff will be needed. Initially one FTE position ($100,000) will be required. Over the next 6 years the 2007-20012 CFP has identified $8,000,000 in projects to be completed. These equate to approximately $1,350,000 per year. Our current rate distributions generate approximately $120,000 of revenue for each dollar collected. To fully fund the annual $1,350,000 would require a rate of $11.25 per month. This $8.25 increase is not a reality and priorities within the staffing and CFP program will need adjustments. In addition we may need to review the commercial (35%) and residential (65%) contributions to the overall revenues. Based on impervious areas for commercial (52%) and residential (48%) an adjustment may be needed to be more equitable. Currently monthly contributions from contiguous commercial properties are capped at 10 equivalent residential units (ERU) or $30.00. Adjusting or removing the cap limits and/or modifying the ERU impervious area from 4000 s.f. are alternate methods to bring the commercial and residential rates to equity. Removing the cap would provide an estimated additional 2600 ERUs or $90,000 in annual revenues at the current $3.00 ERU rate. Reducing the ERU areas from 4,000 s.f. to 3,500 s.f. would not increase the residential revenues but would N:\UAC\Final\stormwater rates 2006.doc Stormwater Utility Rates May 9,2006 Page 3 raise the commercial revenues by $142,200 with cap or $390,000 without cap at the current $3.00 ERU rate. These options are shown in the following table: Alternates Residential Commercial Total 1. No change (Current) $232,500, 65% $124,500,35% $357,000, 100% 2. Remove ERU cap $232,500, 52% 214,500, 48% 447,000, 100% 3. Reduce ERU to 3500 s.f. $232,500,47% 266,700,53% 499,200, 100% with ERU cap 4. Reduce ERU to 3500 s.f. $232,500, 36% 414,500,64% 647,000, 100% without ERU cap Impervious areas 48% 52% 100% These proposals are for opening the discussion with the UAC on Stormwater Utility Rate adjustments need to meet the CFP program as well as pending NPDES Phase II unfunded requirements. At minimum, a stormwater engineer/manager position is desired to meet current stormwater design, construction management, consultant management, pursuit of funding opportunities, and monitoring of DOE and other agency pending programs and impacts. N:\UAC\Final\stormwater rates 2006.doc . ~' .~-'- , . c.,. ;.",".'::' ::f':'::~ ~.>~;~~: ~;f'." ~ ;,;~:: :W~::.~~1>_:: ':-:i,::,,i:';. ,;';:-.J.:;' NovcmbCli'ii. 2603 City CounCIl RE: StoriJiW8leT Utility, Fonnation P8ge~/ ' , :;.' . STOR.MW A TER PROJECT MA TRlX Project Description. Estimated Project Type . Project Cost ; Flooding , Econ. Other 'CSO I Red. 'Dev. i & Eros. ! .Laurel & US 101 j 'j X : $500,000* X i Canyon Edge & AbJvers : $500,000* X . . : $500,000* X X' i RoselThistle area ' . i CampbelllPoner Area 1$500,000* X X 'I "C" Street Extension Area ; $500,000* 'X X ! X ! Over Bluff Disch. (N, 101\ P, McD) ~ $100,000 ea. X ;. 1 Lincoln ParkIBig Boy Pond' i $250,000 X X . . . i Downtown' CSO ; $500,000** , X X . i'Lincoln Stonn 4th _6th : $200 000**' ' X X , , ! Lincoln' Stom 6th _7th l $) 00~000** X : X L AlbertlEunice Stonn ; $250,000** .... I i 10lh &' Milwaukee Area : $400,000* X : Milwaukee & "P" Area : $800,000* . i X , ' , ~ Upper Golf Course Road Area ; $500;000* X : 10th &"N" Regional Dete~tion : $300;000 X ; Lincoln Street Culvert Repairs : $100,000 X , ~ (City's Share) . Street Outfalls to StreamslMarine : $50,000/yr X X , Stream Rehabilitation (Matchjn~ $) $50,000 X .._._-_._----_._-..._.~--- · Placeholder,Estimates until Preliminary Engineering can be completed · .CSO related work can be funded fully or partially from Wastewater Fund N:\CCOUNCIL\FINAL\StonnwateT Utility Formation, Public HearinlLA.wpd . 84 2006 - 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECTS PRIORITY ORDER PROJECT TITlE 2006 PROJ. COST 2006 CITYGF COST 1 WW01-ll6 Francis St Sewer Main 2,900,000 2.900,000 500,000 2,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,900,000 2.300,000 y 2 WW03-ll6 CSO Storage Tank 4,100,000 4. 00,000 0 1,900,000 2,200.000 0 0 0 0 4,100,000 2,200.000 N 3 WW06-ll6 Misc. CSO Proiects - 9 Minimum Controls 250,000 250,000 150,000 100,000 0 0 .0 0 0 250,000 y 4 WW27-99 Annual Replacements lines 675,000 675,000 0 100,000 . 0 275,000 0 300.000 0 675,000 N 5 WW03~5 Plant Haadwor1<s Imorovemenls 375,000 375,000 0 375,000 0 0 0 0 0 375,000 N 6 WW07~ Inatell Vortex Ring Mixer 35,000 35,000 0 35.000 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 N 7 WW02-ll6 Force Mains For New PS #4 6,500,000 6,500.000 0 0 450,000 6,050,000 0 0 0 6,500,000 5,600,000 y 8 WW02~5 Plant De-waterino lmorovemento 1,000.000 1,000,000 0 0 1,000.000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 N 9 WW~ Rotery Blowers 80.000 80,000 0 0 80,000 0 0 0 0 80,000 N 10 WW04-ll6 Railroad Ave./Llnooln 51. Greavity Sewer 3,300,000 3,300,000 0 0 0 500,000 2,800.000 0 0 3,300.000 2,800,000 N 11 WW02~ Reolace Pump Station No, 4 10.500,000 10.500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,500,000 10,500,000 N 12 WW~ Tr9atment Plant for CSO Flov.s 14,000,000 14,000,000 . 0 0 1.000,000 10,000,000 3,000,000 0 0 14,000,000 12,500,000 Y 13 WW05-ll6 Sewer TresUe at Francis & 8111 475,000 475,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 400,000 0 475,000 N 14 WW03-00 Lindberg Rd. Sewer 1,200,000 1,200.000 0 0 0 125,000 1,075,000 0 0 1,200,000 N 15 WW02~ AilDort Industria' Sewer 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 575,000 575,000 0 1,300,000 1,300,000 N 16 WW05-99 Golf Course Road Sewer Interceptor 1,000,000 1.000,000 0 0 0 140,000 860,000 0 0 1,000,000 . N WASTEWATER PROJECTS TOTAL OF MANDATED WASTEWATER PROJECTS 23,650,000 23.650,000 TOTAL OF ALL WASTEWATER PROJECTS 47,690,000 46,390,000 650,000 650,000 o 2,500,000 o 4,910.000 o 1.450.000 16,050,000 3,000,000 0 0 23,650,000 4.730,000 17,240,000 8,385.000 1.275,000 10,500,000 47,690,000 STORMWATER PROJECTS 1 DR04-99 Lincoln Street storm Drain (4111 to 7th St) 400,000 400,000 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 Y 2 DR02-99 City-Wide Catch Basin Modifications 740,000 740,000 80,000 85,000 90.000 95,000 100,000 105,000 110,000 865,000 N 3 DR65-99 10th And "N" Street Regional Storm Detenll 300,000 300,000 0 50,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 300.000 N 4 DR01~ Stormwater Outfallsto Streams & Marine 300,000 300.000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Y 5 DR53-99 Stormwater Dlschalll8s OVer Bluff 670,000 670,000 0 70,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 670,000 Y 6 DR 14-99 Peabcdv Creek/t.inc:oln St Cu1\Iert Rehab 100.000 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 y 7 DR~ Stormwater at Canyon Edoe & Ahlvers 500,000 500,000 0 50,000 200,000 250,000 0 0 0 500,000 N 6 DRO~ Lincoln Parl<Jlllg Bov Pond 300,000 300,000 0 30,000 270.000 0 0 0 0 300,000 N 9 DR~ Stormwater at Cempbell & Porter 500,000 500,000 0 0 50,000 200,000 250,000 . 0 0 500,000 N 10 DR07~ Stormwater at "C" Street Extension 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 50,000 200,000 250,000 0 500,000 N 11 DR0541 Stormwater at Rose & Thistle 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 200,000 250,000 500,000 N 12 DR~ Slormwater at Laurel & US 101 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 200,000 250,000 500,000 N 13 DR02~ Upper Golf Ccurse Rd. Area Stormwater 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 50.000 200,000 250,000 500,000 N 14 DR03-99 Mitwaukee Dr. Stormwater Improvements 1,200,000 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 150,000 500,000 700,000 N 15 DR01~1 First St. Stormwater Separation 250,000 250.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 Y TOTAL OF MANDATED STORMWATER PROJECTS 1,720,000 1,720,000 TOTAL OF ALL STORMWATER PROJECTS 7,260,000 7,260,000 400,000 480,000 220,000 435,000 o 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 220,000 1,520,000 1,030,000 7 5,000 .920,000 1,275,000 1,560,000 6,485,000 TOTAL MANDATED UTILITY PROJECTS 31.745,000 30,945.000 4,950,000 TOTAL OF ALL UTILITY PROJECTS 81,341,000 73,311,000 5.635,000 3,770,000 9,640.000 2,620,000 16,220,000 3,170,000 170.000 220,000 31,120,000 9,606,000 21,650,000 13,040.000 5.530,000 12,730,000 78.031,000 1 1T04-ll6 UPQrade of Compo Rm Environmentals 30,000 30,000 0 30.000 12,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 2 IT02-ll6 Repl. of Camp. Fire Supre..ion System 30.000 30,000 0 30,000 12,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 3 IT03-06 Reol. Como. Power Cond.lUPS Eculp. 60,000 60,000 0 60,000 24,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 4 IT05-ll6 Repl. of DateNoioe Equipment 350,000 350,000 0 0 50,000 300.000 0 0 0 350,000 5 IT01-ll6 Replacement of PBX . Voice System 185,000 165,000 20,000 8,000 20,000 20.000 125,000 0 0 185,000 INFORMAnON TECHNOLOGIES PROJECTS 06-00Prior Page 4 4/21/2005