Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 06/10/2003 UTILITY ADVISORY I-~'OMMITTEE PUBLIE WDRK5 [~ONFERENICE ROOM PORT ANGELES~ WA 98352 JUNE I 0, 2003 3:00 P.M. AGENDA I. [~ALL TO ORDER II. ROLL ~ALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOE MAY 13~ 2003 IV. LATE ITEHS S. COMPLETION OF MABNA DRIVE INSTALLATION (ORAL) O. AMENDMENT TO ~KILLINB~-CONNELLY AGREEMENT E. COMBINED ~EWER OVERFLOW (C50) EVENT~ ~. FLUORIDATION PROJECT UPDATE (ORAL) H. ELECTRI~ UTILITY BUDBET RESERVE5 REPORT I, ~TDEMWATEE UTILITY DISCUSSION VI, NEXT MEETING DATE - dULY ~ 2~3 VII, ADJOURNMENT UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Port Angeles, Washington May 13, 2003 Call to Order: Chairman Erickson called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. II. Roll Call: Members Present: Chairman Erickson, Councilmember Rogers, Dean Reed, Allen Bentley, Councilman Campbell Members Absent: None Staff Present: Craig Knutson, Glenn Cutler, Scott McLain, Gary Kenworthy, Steve Sperr, Larry Dunbar, Jim Harper, Cate Rinehart Others Present: Dick Goodman - KONP III. Approval of Minutes: Chairman Erickson asked if there were any additions or corrections to the meeting of April 8, 2003. Dean Reed moved to approve the minutes. Councilmember Rogers seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. IV. Discussion Items ,4. Construction Of Oil Handling And Warehouse Building James Harper, Electrical Engineering Manager, explained the consultant's estimate for construction exceeded the budgeted funds by $29,000. Three additional items recommended by the consultant included an oil resistant liner, a restroom, and extension of the asphalt paving totaling an additional $34,624. Staff advised including the liner but deferring the other items. There was a brief discussion. Dean Reed moved to recommend to City Council that $45,000 in additional funds be allocated from light reserves and that staff proceed with bidding for the construction of the Oil Handling and Warehouse building. Allen Bentley seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. B. Solar Water Heating Program Agreements Larry Dunbar, Power Resources Manager, reviewed the "Bright Way To Heat Water" program UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE May 13, 2003 explaining the rebates and funding sources. A discussion followed. Staff was advised to include a table in the memo to Council showing the difference between the pilot program and other participating customers. Allen Bentley moved to recommend approval of the Bright Way To Heat Water License Agreement with the Bonneville Power Administration and authorize the Director of Public Works and Utilities, or his designee, to enter into Amendment No. 1 of the City Authorized Contractor Agreement with eligible customers. Dean Reed seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. C. Consultant Agreement With Parametrix For Engineering Services Stephen Sperr, Engineering Manager, pointed out that Parametfix had been selected as the most qualified consultant to continue to provide engineering services related to the Solid Waste Utility, Landfill and Wastewater Treatment Plant. Instead of amending the existing agreement it was felt the best approach would be to execute a new agreement. Key tasks in the proposed new agreement were reviewed and it was noted that the Park Service would be reimbursing the City some money for land use planning. A discussion followed. Staff was directed to include a description of task number seven in the memo to Council. Councilman Campbell moved to recommend City Council authorize the Mayor to sign an Agreement for Professional Services with Parametrix. Allen Bentley seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. D. Fluoridation Memorandum Of Understanding Stephen Sperr, Engineering Manager, described how the City had negotiated a Memorandum of Understanding with the Washington Dental Service Foundation whereby they would "gift" a temporary fluoride facility to the City. The City will operate the temporary facility until the proposed water treatment facility is constructed and operational. Upon completion ora permanent fluoride feed system, at the new water treatment facility, the temporary facility will be abandoned. Staff indicated that a separate gift agreement would be brought to the UAC in August. There was a brief discussion. Councilman Campbell moved to recommend City Council authorize the Mayor to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the Washington Dental Services Foundation to expedite the funding and construction of a fluoridation system. Councilmember Rogers seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. E. Morse Creek }Fater Line Options Stephen Sperr, Engineering Manager, explained that there are six sections of the Morse Creek water line that are not an integral part of the City water system. A review of each section included a description, number of customers, available options, and staff recommendations. Staff advised that five sections required no action. The section from the old chlorination building east of Mount Pleasant Road to the PUD Gales Addition Reservoir has low water pressure due to an increase in customers. Staff 2 UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE May 13, 2003 recommends the installation of a booster station with the possibility of customers within the section sharing construction costs. A discussion followed with concerns expressed regarding the legal obligation to continue to provide water in exchange for an easement. Dean Reed moved to concur with the recommendations which encourages staff to proceed with development of costs and a schedule to implement the recommendation, and look into the current legal responsibilities. Councilmember Rogers seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. V. Late Items Councilmember Rogers requested that the issue of a Stormwater Utility be revisited on a future agenda for discussion. VI. Next Meeting: The next meeting will be June 10, 2003. VII. Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m. Councilmember Erickson, Chairman Cate Rinehart, Administrative Assistant 5/21/03 N:~PWKS~LIGHTXCONS\CAT£hmay 13meet.wpd WASHINGTON, U.S.A. UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Mi:MO DATE: June 5, 2003 TO: UTILITY ADV1SORY COMMITTEE FROM: Dave Ireland, Operations Manager RE: Purchase of Surpluses Manlifi Track From The City of Blaine Washington. Summary: Light Operations' manlift truck #162 is scheduled to be replaced in 2004. The City of Blaine has a new 2002 manlift in their surplus equipment inventory. The City of Port Angeles can purchase this manlift at a substantial savings. Recommendation: Support staff's effort to draft a letter of proposal to the City of Blaine to purchase the surplus manlift for $120,000 contingent upon the approval of the purchase by the City Council. Background/Analysis: Light Operations presently has a 1992 Ford Manlift truck. Truck #162 is a two bucket unit with a working height of sixty feet, and is an integral part of Light Operations equipment. It is a necessity when performing work on the City's transmission lines. Both WISHA and OSHA reference, in numerous regulation locations, that maintenance procedures recommended by the equipment manufacturer be used as a guide for all maintenance to the equipment. Truck #162 is reaching the manufacturer's recommended point when the manlift portion of the truck will have to be replaced. The estimate for replacing this equipment is approximately $250,000.00. The equipment fund for this vehicle currently has $175,000 accumulated for its replacement. At the start of the 2002 budget year the City of Blaine ordered a new, two bucket manlift. After receiving the truck in late 2002, the Blaine line crew found that it was too large to work in the narrow alleys in Blaine. As a result, a decision was made to surplus the new truck and purchase a smaller vehicle better suited for their needs. Under Article VII, 7 of the state constitution, the city must sell the equipment for the fair market value. Blaine has determined that the fair market value of this equipment is $115,000.00 and an additional $5,000.00 for the Braden winch assembly. The basic description of the equipment is: 2002 Chey C-$500 with 1824 miles, 311 hfs on the engine. A MTI Boom with a 5512 working height, double one-man buckets, 200 lb material handler with generous storage bins. June 10, 2003 UAC Re: Manlifi Truck from Blaine Page 2 On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, Operations Manager Dave Ireland and Equipment Operator Veto Daugaard traveled to Blaine to inspect and operate the manlifi. It was determined that this equipment meets the standards which Operations would recommend for the purchase of a new manlift truck. It is recommended that staffmake a tentative offer to the City of Blaine for the purchase of this equipment for $120,000.00 and contingent on City Council approval. This would save the City substantial funds already allotted for this purchase next year. N:\U ACXDep Dir~manlifi wpd Sale of Surplus City Property New Information Added O1/a5/O1 Cities and towns frequently need to setl or convey equipment or property which is no longer needed for municipal purposes. There are relatively few statutes concerning procedures for sale of surplus property. Cities and towns should be familiar with those listed in the Statutes section (under "Reference Sources" below), and you should keep these points in mind: 1. Prior to sale, always determine the fair market value of the item to be sold. If you sell it for less, you may be violating Article VIIi,7 of the state constitution, the "gift clause." But see RCW 39.33.01q, listed in the Statutes section (under "Reference Sources" below). 2. Hold a public hearing, if required by RCW 39.33.020 or RCW 35.94.040, listed in the Statutes. AGO :L997 No. 5 concludes that the public hearing requirement in RCW 39.33.020 only applies to intergovernmental transfers of property. 3. Pass a resolution declaring the property to be surplus, and specifying how the property is to be sold, or delegating that task to a particular administrative official. 4. Proceed with sale as required by the town or city council, or in any commercially reasonable way. Sale can be by auction, private sale, sealed bid, through a broker or agent, etc. 5. Keep in mind that city officials and certain administrative officers may be restricted from purchasing surplus property due to conflict of interest concerns. The general rule is that those who are involved in the decision to surplus property (the council) and those in charge of administering the sale (mayor, city manager, or other city officer responsible for the sale) should not purchase the property. General city employees can purchase surplus city property. 6. Consider adopting policies concerning sale of city property. See the Documents section, below. The above information is from the Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington. MATERIAL HAN. DLING ./MAN LIFT SPE~2IFICATIONS Equipment will be in fully operational condition and previous equipment operation time shall not exceed 10 hours as indicated by the equipment hour meter, at time of delivery. Factors considered in determining final bid award will include, but ate not limited to, bid price, warmaty provisinna, service facility lOcanon, compatibility with existing equipment, and routine maintenance requirements. Bidder assumes all costs and responsibilities of product delivery to: City of Blame Public Works 1200 Yew Street Blaine, WA 98230 A. DELIVERY: ,/ 1. Biddermuststatenumberofdaysafterawardthattheywillguaranteedelivery completion. d' 2. Delivery will be no later than 200 days after the date of award. B. TRAINING: t,// 1. Operator The ~uccessful bidder shall provide one full and complete training class for the operator crew of the MATERIAL HANDLING/MAN LIFT TRUCK. Training shall include a demonstration of all equipment provided. 6// 2. Service Crew The successful bidder ahall provide one full and complete training class for the service maintenance crew assigned to the MATERIAL HANDLING/MAN LIFT TRUCK. Training shall include detailed explanation of the routine maintenance of the hydraulic system, electrical system, trouble shooting procedures, and a complete demonstration of all the features and accessories. C. MANUALS: c'/ 1. Ooerator's manual The successful bidder shall provide two operator's manual for the MATERIAL HANDLINO/MAN LIFT TRUCK, giving full and complete information and instructions on operation. O/ 2. ServieeManual: The successful bidder shall provide have two manuals for the Truck giving detailed instructions for the maintenance and repair/major overhaul for all components, including l~:~u $~'~:~m~ on~lig~tL'x~t _~% i d d~ e~ Page I electrical diagrams/schematics and pteventat/ve maintenance schedule and procedures for all components subject to wear. ~/ 3. Parts Manuak Th~ suecessfvl bidder shall provide two manuals identifying all compontnts including all purchased items. TEs identification shall be nomenclature and description exploded view drawings r~lated to thc vehicle manufacturer's part number. x~ D. WARRANTY: Manufacturer's wananty shall be a minimum of two years on the entire bid item. Bidder shall attach a copy of the warranty. Se_e- ~/2. Extended warranty In addition to manufacturer's warranty on the Truck, Bidder shall provide an option for aa extended coverage contract for machine repair, part~, and labor for a minimum years or 3,000 hours, whichever occurs first. Bidder shall attach a copy of thc proposed extendad coverage contract. "~CP--~O_O_~'- o.)E~-V-~Cc~t/ 1 5 t//3. WarranW Implementation Warranty coverage shall not commence until the machine is delivered to the City of Blaine Public Works in satisfactory condition and accepted by the City of Blaine Public Works. //4..Po~-deliverv Inspection Bidder shall include in the bid price the cost of post-delivery inspection service of the equipment, approximately th/ny (30) days after it is p/aced in service. The inspection shall include the following: '/~ a. Check all operating systems for proper operation and adjustment. t~b. Check equipment visually for leaks and material defects. ~]~0~ E. MATERIALS: AtticuIating Over-Center Aerial Device, installed aR of rear axle, built in acc~'dance with Manufacturer~ standard specifications and to include thc following standard Minimum requ/remeats: t/'a. Pe~kWorkingHcight: 59' (minimum) G0" /' b. Peak Reach to F_,d_~e of Platform: 45' (minimum with boom ov~ center) t~ ~ ' t/c. Pede~ad and Turntable; Box structure design with large service openings and easy to remove covers. Heavy duty checker plate on pedestal surface. /~d. Rotation: 36012 continuous rotation provided by self-locking worm gear drive, equipped with ~er}ded shaft for manual rotation. o. Lower Boom; Fabricated, reinforced steel with a fiberglam insert, 90UlOminimum lowerboom articulation. /JI05° ) f. Uv'oer Boom: High demsit~, rigid, fiberglass. Articulation: 210Ell3minimum (0205 ~,/g. Platforms: Two (2) single one-manto~ally enclosed fiberglass platforms with liners. Approximately 24" x 30" x 42'; with one outside stop for ~nlty and 300 pound platform capacity each. Automatic mechanical platform I~gi .Manual. platform .fi. It mechanism provided for each platform. Platforms .d~l b*'e4?pped vnth a hydmuhc rotator providing approximately 94 degn:es of rotationt' q0' J ~/h. Pl~t, for~.Liner: liner for each single man ~latfo~ 46,000Volt minimum protectlv~ rating. ~ i. Hydraulic System: Pressure and flow compensating system provides pressure and flow on demand. Pressure and flow range suitable to achieve multiftm~t/on opea'ation. Syst~n consists of a pressure-compensated, load-sensing industrial piston pump, hydraulic reservoir and control valve assemblies. Hydraulic pressure test connector at j. Jib/Winch, Hvdrnulic Tiltin~ - With power tool circuit (two sets of quick disconnects). Material handling jib to provide a minimum cxtt, nsion o£2', gO' of 1/2" diameter double-braided U.V. resistant synthetic rop~ upper control valves for jib tilt, winch and pow~r tool circuit. Awdliary winch control at tumlabl¢. Jib shall lmve a removable double sheave head assembly that provides a 3" recoplacle for thc optional hot arm aceessori~. Note: Thc winch line, jib, and boom structure shall be rated to handle 2,000 pounds. k. Lifting Capacity: With upper boom angle of 60° from horizontal, lower boom in any position, and 600 pound load in platforms, thc rated capacity for materials on thc jib extended 4 feet shall be 1,800 pounds. 1. Tool Ciraiit: Quick disconnects at tail shelf on cotbsidc outrigger valves. /'m Throttle Control: Automatically actuated by hydraulic system for control of truck n. Lower Gontrols: Three-lever control valve. o. Two uwer Controls: 0nc for each platform, single handle, self-cenl~/ng, pressur/zed, hydraulic remote cor~rol at platform equipped with W/gger activated double int~lock and ¢l,~aieally isolated from tower base. Conventional three handle ground control~ located on glratable in¢lucling interlock and upper control ov©rride. p. Control Purging System; Provisions for elimination of air fi.om control line when servicing. q. Dielectric Rating: ANSI A92.2-1990, Category B, 46 kV and below. Vacuum fla~hover protection included. r. ISO 9001 Certification: This aerial dcvica is manufactured in a facility that is e,e, Rifi~d to me. Cf I$0 9001 gquitcmen~. $. Engine Start/Stop: Captive air activated, toggle switch located at lower controls; additional toggle switch installed n~ar outrigger tonal. t. Ememen~v Onerafin~ System: Electric powered, includes pump and motor, ol/:mmted from tm& Ii:~attery, captive air activated. u.. Outriders. Pdmarv & Auxiliary: Two sets, fold-up shoe A-frame, 153" maximum ./sprend installnd b~w*~n cab and body and behind the pedestal. v. Outride,er lntedook: To prevent boom operation until outriggers are lowered. w. Outd=~er Down Alarm: Audible alarm to sound only when outriggers are deployed. Ae~l Aecesso~es: a. pi'O: Hot shi~ PTO mounted on automatic transmission, PTO dash, with iarlic~or light. b. Sub-ha~e Qompartm~nt: full length, in,~talled between front outriggers and rear of platform, rear aeeess door/'or long tool ~/orage. I~tall toni storage stop at 120", full w/dth of sub-base. /'c. Wheel Chocks: Two tubber chocks w~th metal handle. d. Hot Ann Assembly: Chanee//T400-1824 Hot Arm aas~nbly or equivalent. e. Ro/AI Wir~ Holder; Chance large roll wir~ holder with s~itable athp~:r and jib f. L/ne Puller: 4,000 pound tension line pullet, 0-120 rpm control valve, air coutroller, installed on front of vehicle, include a 7-inch bayonet capstan reel, a collapsible reel, digkal torque display, and emergency stop ,/a. Basic body fabricated from A60 grade 100% zinc alloy coated steel. /b. Whool Chock Holders: One (1) ins~.alled each side in £endcr panels. /c. All doors are full, double paneled, self-sealed with built-in drni~Ee. Elec~o z/nc-plated steel hinge wd extending ent/~e length of door. I-I/nges are zinc alloy /d. Mtn/mute compartment d~pth 18" and width 24". Prov/de a m/rdmum of four compa~nents on oach side of the body with bottom drains. e. All donrs contain cadmium-plated, flush-mounted, singl¢-poing paddle latches with recessed handle. Doors include keyed-alike locks and adju~able two-stage ~-/lcers. FIandle~ are riveted to the outer door panel. Back panel has opening for access to handle/lock assembly. f. Automotive non-porous type door seal mechanically fastened to door facing. g. Heavy-gauge welded steel base construction with checker plate floor. h. All ed~3es either rolled or folded for strength and safeW, i. Stainless steel/Iood light with posit/ener arm. Driver side mounted with 500-watt halogen lumina~ and adjustable beam pattern. Dour header drip ra/l at top for maximum weather protecaon. Neoprene molding wheel well cat-outs I. Automotive underseal applied to complete undem'ructure. m, Prime painted, Steel pre-tre_~t~l for superior primer adhesion and ms~ resistance, n. Lights in all compartments, dome type, to be mounted on the doors, wired through in-dash master swiwh. o. Rigid door hold~s in each vertical. p. R~ar platform ext~tsion, 30", for mounting on top ofsubframe extension, cut- out for f01d-up shoe A-ilmme outriggers. v/q. Cable steps, one (1) each side at rear. r. Grab hand[~s, one (1) at aubsick platform, two (2) at rear on ouixiggers. s. Compartment top acecss step, installed behind curbslde compartments in cargo t. Ace, s step, installed on top of rear corbside compai~n~nts for access to "~,~, 4. ~odV.,~cc~s~cs.; · / ~ Tow~g p~o ~clud~g: p~tlc hitc~ P~er 580 or ~u[val~ ~un~ 27" ~ve ~o~d. ~ b, P~c h~k mo~ting c~el ~ "D' ~ ~led. / d. Mud ~ b~, / c. ~ ~ ~ r~or, mo~ & ~ ~[de ~m~cnL / ~ Fire c~hcr, 5 lb., ~C ~c, ~th b~ mo~d m fi~ ~-sidc ~mpa~cnt. / g. T~vcl ~i~t p~rd mo~ on ~h. / h, P~ ~c, on fo~ end of~, ~ side. / i. U~ ~ ~ld~. / j. ~gger p~ ~ldcrs ~led under.y, sui~lc for 18'~ x 18" pa~ ~ a. ~m ~ ~o~ in ~o~n~ wi~ ~SS gt08: all wiring ~11 ~ cdmp~ with ~lderI~ conn~tor~ ~d en~osed in s~-~bmg wi~ mt~ ~t. ~1 wire e~ a~ ~ed before inse~i~ into plu~. ~1 plug m~e~om ar~ mmpl~ely ~ed ~d wmthe~ Entire ~s~bl~ i~ enelm~ in ~mpl~ ~th ~ ~oly~n~e le~es ~d h~ing~ ~rding ~u~dor impa~ ~ b. ~ p~t* mo~t~g b~ket. ~ c. 7-xmy ~il~ ~cle ~ m~alar plug ~d w~r~b~ ~clu~s ~, ~11~ ~ r~. ,/fl. B~e controller, ~iler. ct~tfi~ele~c: Di~, ~ll~d in c~sis b~c li~t c~it. ~ c. Bac~p ~ ~r~ ~ugh ~c~p /f. S~tch p~cl wi~ imc~l ~O hour m~cr. ~llcd ia ~ for a~so~ swRch~, g~ug~, ~d iadic~tor light, iacluding: Tmc~chiac ssHtc~ PTO ~itch, ~m~cat light ~vitc~ ~d ~robc light ~t~ ~ li~t switch, b~ light swRch. ~ud~ one bl~ p~i~o~ for &~g u~tioa. ~ g. ~b~r ~cd four-inch ~ju~b/c ligh~ m~ntcd on ~ pedal or outfights ~cing ~. ~ i. T~ complgc ~t in ~r~ ~th ~S~S~ ~uircm~: ~ (1) ~SI A922-19~ ~tcgo~ B '46kV ~d below" Ac~ Dcvi~ ~(2) Pm~& ~c of~pl~cc. ~ ~clu~c ~c ~yi~d ~i~on. Pro,dc a ~lly ~n~o~l ~ck ~is ~ mc~ ~ ~llo~g m~um / - ~ 180" / - G~ - 35,~ lbs. ~/- Frame RBM - 1.3 X 10 ~ - En~ - D~I, 230 ~ ~ 2200 ~ 605 ~-1~. ~ l~m (~m~ ~w~ ~u~) ~ - T~i~ - A~c, / - B~ - ~, a~ ~ b~n ~ls / - ~st- ~i~l / - Fuel ~ ~ 45 ~llon (~), ~, fo~d of ~ back ~ - ~or- 1~0 ~ - ~fi~-~ 1850 t~ CCA / - ~h - S~I risc, 10-hole / - ~ - ~v~ti~ ~ tilt ~ ~d ~r ~¢mbly / - Full ~d~ ~ bum~ ~ ~w h~ks / - ~ion ~c ~cluding engine hour meter ~ - ~o - ~ ~rm ~ OF SPEG~CA~ON TITAN -- The Material Handling Aerial Device with Muscle Higher Capacities with Less Boom Flex. The TITAN Series is designed for mom Heavy-Duty Material Lifting capability Optional lower boom articulation (105°) provides eve and extraordinary versatility. Booms are rectangular for more strength and less more side reach on the TITAN. Telescoping, rectangt Ilex. No cha, ins or cables are used for ~ifting the booms, lar self-locking outriggers offer superior stability. · SU/vt 4ARY DIMENSIONS T5-43 T5-46 T5-50 T5-55 PLATFORM HEIGHT* 43 ft (13.1m) 46 ft (14.0m) 50 ft (15.3m) 55 ff (16.8m) WORKING HEIGHT* 48 ft (14.6m) 51 fl (15.5m) 55 ft (16.8m) 60 ft (18.3m) PLATFORM CAPACITY** 700 lbs (318kg) 700 lbs (318kg) 700 lbs (318kg) 700 lbs (318kg) MAXIMUM HORIZON'rAL REACH 38 It (11.6m) 41 it (12.5m) 45 ft (14.3m) 50 It (15.3m) DEGREES OF UPPER BOOM ACTUATION 225° 225° 225° 225° DEGREES LOWER BOOM ACTUATES OVERCENTER (LO) 90° 105° 105° 105° ROTATION continuous continuous continuous continuous * Platform and working height can vary with chassis frame height and body floor height. ** For (2) one man side-hung platforms By providin~j a fu~l 90° rotation with hydraulic power, this 2-man end-hung 24" x 48" p{at- form ensures easy positioning for the operator, A 24" x 30" bucket is also available. · STANDARD FEATURES The jib has a manual or hydraulic power~ · Smooth, continuous rotation adjustment of 180' so that the TITAN jib c~ · Rectangular, tapered fiberglass booms for greater strength easily be used to lift conductors at any upp, boom angle. TECO'a patented I-Beam co~ · Heavy-duty leveling system struction provides superior strength even wh¢ · Telescoping, rectangular outriggers for excellent stability the jib is fully extended. · Lower boom insulation insert up to 24' of clear insulation · Single handle platform control --Total directional actuation · Pressure compensating hydraulic system for smooth actuation · Safety Power-Lock System for more protection TECO reserves th~ right to imprm~ models and change specif'~a, tio~ · Meets or exceeds all ANSI standards. ( 9733 Indianapolis Road · OPTIONS Fort Wayne, I. USA 46809 · Overcenter Lower Boom Telephone: (219) 747-1631 · Hydraulic Platform Rotators · Engine Start/Stop at Platform Fax: (219) 747-6732 · Materi~l Lifting 'System · Platform 't'ilt System · Conductor Lifting Equipment · Platform Liners and Covers · Hydraulic Extendable Jib · Hydraulic Tool Line Installation TITAN T5 SPECIFICATIONS TECO, Inc. FORT WAYNE, INDIANA (219) 747-1631 FAX (219) 747-6732 NOVEMBER 199( SUMMARY DIMENSIONS PLATFORM HEIGHT* 43 ~,/13,1 m 46 E,/14,0m 50 E./15.3m 55 ff./16.8m WOR~NG HEIG~* 48 ff./14,6m 51 ff./15.5m 55 ff./16.8m 60 E./18.3m P~ORM HEIGHT 45 ~,/13,7m 48 ~./14.6m 52 E./15.8m 57 ff./17.4m R~ERSE MOUSING** WOR~NG HEIG~ 50 ff./15.3m ~ E./16.2m 57 ~./17.4m 6~./18.9m R~RSE MOUSING** P~ORM CAPAC~ 700 1~./318 kg 700 Ibs./318 kg 700 Ibs./318 kg 7~ Ibs.~17 kg ~ HORIZO~AL R~CH 38 fl./11.6m 41 E./12.5m 45 ~./14.3m 50 ~/15.3m DEGREES OF U.B. AC~ATION 205° 205° 205° 205° DEGREES OF LOWER BOOM 90° 90° 90° 90° ACtAeON OP~O~ LB. AR~CU~ON N/A 105° 105° 105° * Pla~orm ~d working height ~n va~ w~h cha~is tr~e height and ~y floor height. ** Reveme mounting, w~h the plaffo~ cradled over the cha~is ~b, general~ requir~ the ~e~al to ~ spaced up ~proxim~ely ~o (2) feet (.6m) raising the working height accordingly. STRUCTURAL AND MECHANICAL COMPONENTS pl~ ~Eed to the ~e. ~e un~ p~ is PEDESTAL OF S~ONG BOX S~UC~RE mou~ dir~ to the subfr~e ~d the o~figgem DESIGN ~ ~ure welded. ~e 1~· ~1 top pl~e ~ are mou~ one pair behind the re~ ~le ~d one ~1~ ma~in~ ~er welding to i~ure ~ a~ur~e p~r behind the ~b. I~el suda~ for mounting the being ting for longer ~ng I~e. Removable ~vem pr~ide f~ ~ ~SCOPING RECT~GU~R COMPACT SE~- a~ to all hydraulic com~ne~s hous~ in the LOCKING OU~IGGERS ~mplete~ e~l~ and ~. P~ ~ d~igned for mounting ~er prot~ the wlinder from road deb~ ~d o~er the r~ ~e or behind the ~b. ~in~i~. ~e re~gul~ profile elimin~ ~ ~i~ing force on the ~linder. O~dgger ~lindem ~e ~R~AB~-FI~RE WE~ED BOXSTRUC~RE double pilot choked to avoid r~ra~ing or e~ending DESIGN ~d machined ~er welding to pr~de ~ unle~ ~dmulic pr~ure is appli~ by a~ing the a~e fl~ sudace for mourning the rot~ion ~rol v~e. ~is also eliminat~ the problem of ~afing ting, ~e m~n boom p~ot pin is 3' in o~figgem d~ing o~ dudng road tr~el. Each di~eter and mounted in seff-lubri~ting replaceable o~figger ~linder ~ h~ ~ck-up ~e~ shrift oil broke ~adngs. I~k v~e I~ed at the o~rigger ~rol va~e. Each o~dgger is inde~nde~ co~roll~. When SUBF~E TO PREVENT CHASSIS F~ME fully e~end~, the o~figgem h~e a tot~ spr~d of ~IS~NG ~ in.ailed w~h the T~. ~e subEame 12 or 13 feet ~d when retraced, measure 7'11', is mou~ dire~ to the cha~is frame w~h the side TITAN T5 SPECIFICATIONS PAGE 2 STRUCTURAL AND MECHANICAL COMPONENTS (Con't.) Outriggem are installed to provide a lift of 5-9 inches. UPPER FIBERGLASS BOOM with rectangular shape The TITAN requires four (4) outriggers with one pair for less flex and higher strength. TECO's unique located behind the mar axle and one pair installed multiple-layercompression moldingprocessprovides just behind the chassis cab. Also, available with the for most efficient strength design. The fiberglass 'ITl'AN reveme mount (pedestal mounted behind the reinforced plak'tic boom is sealed with a gelcoat shell cab) is the short outrigger installation for behind the of the best grade available providing for a smooth, rear axle. This installation eliminates the outrigger white, non-porous exterior surface. This protects the assembly extending into the cargo ama of the body. structural fiberglass from degradation by uitraviolat radiation, abrasive damage, moisture and is also ROTATION SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS is stain resistant. The intedor sudace of the fiberglass accomplished with a high strength, field-proven boom is also smooth and resists moisture and shear ball bearing turntable. Rotation is continuous contamination. As with all 3'ECO fiberglass booms, and unrestricted. Rotation speed is approximately I the TITAN upper boom is designed with a minimum RPM. The shear ball bearing has induction heat safety factor often (10)and this design safety factor treated inner and outer races for longer wear. The is met with all rated personnel and matedal lifting bearing races are bolted to the turntable and loads, TECO's method of constructing fiberglass mainframe with Grade 8 cap screws, A heavy duty booms provides for excellent dielectric strength. The gear box with a self-locking high strength worm and upper boom assembly is tested at 150 KV which spur gear drives the inner race of the turntable exceeds the ANSI standard for 69 KV rating. bearing. The gear box has an extended auxiliary hex Electrical testing at higher KV is available if shaft for manual rotation of the unit if necessary, requested. Permanent dielectric test bands are installed at the lower end of the upper boom. The RECTANGULAR LOWER BOOM AND MOLDED chart below shows the effective insulation gap of the RECTANGULAR LOWER BOOM INSULATION upper boom byTITAN model The charted insulation INSERT provides more efficient strength. The lower gap is not affected by the platform leveling system. boom insulation insert is designed structurally stronger by molding the fiberglass reinforced insert TITAN T5 UPPER BOOM directly to the lower boom metal, sandwiching the INSULATION LENGTH metal between layers of the fiberglass reinfomed insert. This method of construction and the MODEL CLEAR INSULATION LENGTH rectangular shape provides the most structural T5-43 8'6' (2.6m) resistance to fiberglass and metal separation due to T5-46 10'6' (3,3m) torque shock ~oads. All TECO lower boom fiberglass T5-50 12'9' (3,9m) insulation inserts are designed with a minimum T5-55 15'3' (4.7m) safety factor of ten (10). The TITAN lower boom fiberglass insert, constructed by the multiple-layer compression molded method, also features the protective gelcoat outer layer. The lower boom fiberglass insert provides 24' of clear insulation gap with excellent dielectric strength. The T5-43 model has 12' of clear insulation gap. TITAN T5 SPECIFICATIONS PAGE STRUCTURAL AND MECHANICAL COMPONENTS (Con't). TOTAL PLATFORM MAX. CAPACITY MODEL CAPACITY OF UNIT EACH pLATFORM DIRECT CYLINDER LINKAGE ELBOW ACTUATION provides for sure solid upper boom movement, no T5~3 700 Ibs/318 kg 350 Ibs/159 kg cables or chains are used to actuate the upper T5-46 700 Ibs/318 kg 350 Ibs/159 kg boom. TECO's unique four (4) bar elbow linkage TS~0 700 Ibs/318 kg 350 lbs/159 kg T5-55 700 Ibs1318 k9 350 tbs/159 kg provides for a balanced force requirement, a constant movement of the upper boom relative to A ring bolt for each platform is attached to the boom cylinder rod extension and a lower folded-travel profile. The upper boom has a total travel of 225°. tip for attachment of safety belts. This basket is electrically tested in water to assure FIBERGLASS MOLDED HIGH STRENGTH no breakthrough at 30,000 volts. The minimum wall PLATFORMS are constructed with multiple layers of thickness of the basket is '/4'. woven roving and 'Polyite' resin. These materials have excellent dielectric strength properties. The PLATFORM LEVELING SYSTEM WITH HIGH- exterior surface is sealed with the best grade of STRENGTH SWAGED STEEL FIBERGLASS ROD gelcoat for superior protection. ENDS make the TITAN leveling system stronger. The straight line structural leveling system consists of SINGLE-MAN SIDE-HUNG PLATFORMS The TITAN heavy duty roller chain, 3/4' fiberglass insulator rods can be equipped with one (1) or two (2) side-hung and no cables are placed around sheaves thus single-man platforms which measure 24' x 24' x 42' eliminating cable wear. For protection, the leveling deep. The standard platform control and control system is enclosed in the booms. TECO's method guard location where two (2) single-man baskets are of swaging the steel fittings to the ends of the 3/4' mounted is on the boom side of the curbside basket. This permits emergency control from either basket, fiberglass rods results in a stronger design. The standard platform control and control guard STRUCTURAL DESIGN SAFETY FACTORS location where only one (1) basket is mounted is on EXCEED ANSI REQUIREMENTS on theTITAN units. the basket side away from the boom. This permits All metal structural components in the unit as they the basket to be mounted closer to the boom where support the rated load are designed to provide a a platform rotator is not specified. Where one side- minimum safety factor of 3:1 on yield and a minimum hung platform is specified the standard mounting is safety factor of 5:1. Structural fiberglass booms and on the curbside of the boom tip. All reference made platforms are designed at a minimum ultimate to platform and control location assumeS the TITAN strength safety factor of 10:1. mounted over the rear axle. Baskets are molded in one piece with a combination of multiple layers of PRESSURE COMPENSATING SYSTEM provides woven roving and 'Polylte' resin. These materials pressure and flow on demand. This type of hydraulic have excellent dielectric and structural strength system eliminateS pressure surging, pulsing hoseS, properties. The exterior surface of these parts is oil heat build-up from continuous flow, and loading- sealed with the best grade of gelcoat presently unloading of engine. This system consists of a available. The interior has a resin coating for sealing pressure compensated, load sensing, high efficiency purposes and a rubber met is cemented to the bottom. A step is provided on the outside of the hydraulic pump. Regardless of load, this system basket toward the elbow. Following is a chart operates smoothly. showing the capacltias: ST5-11-96 TITAN T5 SPECIFICATIONS PAGE 4 HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS · UNI-GRIP' PLATFORM CONTROL WITH POWER- auxiliaP/ handle is located on each ground valve to LOCK AND AUTOMATIC PURGING provides sure permit manual control of the valve spool. A shut-off feathering control in six directions with one hand. valve located near the ground control provides for This patented system with automatic purging immediateoverddeoftheplatformcontrais. Also, this eliminates the possibility of the handle becoming stiff valve can be used to shut off all hydraulic pressure or hard to move in cold weather. The one handle to the pilot lines in the booms to stop oil leakage if control provides for individual movement of one of the Iow pressure tubes are damaged and the unit the three (3) actuating components or simultaneous can still be operated from the main ground control. movement of more than one of the actuating components. Coordinatedcontrolhandleenablesthe EXCE!! FNT SYSTEM FILTERING is provided in operator to move the platform in a straight line order to extend the life of the hydraulic fluid and vertically or horizontally. This pilot system operates keep system wear to a minimum. A 200 mesh screen at a Iow pressure off the main hydraulic system and filter is placed in the suction line between the activates the spools in the three (3) main control reservoir tank and the pump. Also a 10 micron filter valves at the base. Heavy, bulky bundles of full is placed in the return line just ahead of the reservoir pressure hoses routed through the booms to the tank. platform area are not required with this control system. All the small hydraulic control lines routed HYDRAULIC PRESSURE HOSE ASSEMBLIES are through the booms are checked to assure that no of wire reinforced construction where insulated hose voids occur and affect the dielectric quality of the is not required and where insulated hose is required insulate~l booms, the hose is nylon reinforced, All hose and fittings are permanently swagged to assure against leakage. All TECO'S SAFETY POWER-LOCK SYSTEM is a pressure hoses have a minimum burst factor rating double protection against the operator accidentiy of four (4). moving the unit. There is no hydraulic power avail- able at the platform control unless the trigger on the HIGH PERFORMANCE CYMNDERS are structurally control handle is held depressed. If the tdgger is designed with a minimum burst factor of four (4). All released, ail hydraulic pressure is cut-off and the unit cylinders are double pilot checked with all pilot will stop regardless in what position the handle is check valves built into the cylinder housing. This held. This system is also used at the base controls prevents the cylinder from moving due to oil leakage where a palm button must be held depressed before or pressure failure, Pressure must always be applied any of the three (3)valves have hydraulic pressure to both ends of the cylinder before it can be available for activation of the unit. activated. This also eliminates cylinder creepage due to control valve leakage. The upper boom pilot check LOWER CONTROLS FEATURE IMMEDIATE can be manually released to allow the boom to be OVERRIDE OF THE PLATFORM CONTROLS by lowered in case of pressure failure and the lower moving a quarter turn shut-off knob. The main boom pilot check can be manually released to allow ground control valve consists of three (3) four-way the lower boom to be lowered if a pressure failure valves with special spools which are spdng centered occurs. in a normally closed center position. These special spools are moved either way by means of pistons which are actuated by the Iow pressure hydraulic pilot system connected with the platform pilot control through small plastic nylon reinforced tubes. An ST5-11-96 TITAN T5 SPECIFICATIONS PAGE 5 HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS (Con't.) A PTO-PUMP combination mounted to the truck AUTOMATIC THROTrLE CONTROL activates transmission is the standard power supply for the acceleration of the engine only when hydraulic oil is hydraulic system of the TiTAN. The system is needed during actuation of the TITAN. A significant designed to deliver 10-12 G.P.M. fuel savings is realized by use of this system. OPTIONAL TITAN EQUIPMENT MATERIAL LIFTING SYSTEMS OTHER TITAN OPTIONS TECO'S TITAN OFFERS MATERIAL LIFTING. The Emergency hydraulic system material lifting system offem a serf-locking winch Engine start/stop from platform without the requirement for an adjustable brake. A Gin pole socket hydraulically powered or manual jib angle adjustment Hydraulic tool outlets at platform and/or pedestal of 180° with the added capability of lifting Outfiggerboomintedocksystem conductors at any upper boom angle is featured. Auxiliary power systems Offered also with this system is one (1) or two (2) Platform liners side-hung platforms with hydraulic platform rotators. Platform covers CHASSIS REQUIREMENTS When selecting a chassis for the TITAN vadous The minimum chassis weight ratings for the II lAN factors must be considered such as intended use should be: (off-road and/or rolling terrain), weight of auxiliary equipment to be installed on the chassis, type of GV~NR 27,000 Ib./12,247.2 kg engine and desired payload. FAWR 9,000 lb./4,082.4 kg RAWR 18,000 lb./8,164.8 kg CHARTED CAB/AXLE DIMENSIONS Minimum Cab-Axle 102' 102' 102' 102- (2590mm) (2590mm) (2590mm) (2590mm) Recommended Cab-Axle 102' 102' 102'-120' 120' (2590mm) (2590mm) (2590- 3048mm) (3048mm) Minimum Cab-Axle Reverse Mount 102- 102' 120' 120' (2590mm) (2590mm) (3048mm) (3048mm) Minimum Cab-Axle w/Material Lifting 102- 102' 102' 120' (2590mm) (2590mm) (2590mm) (3048mm) STS- 11-96 TITAN T5 SPECIFICATIONS PAGE 6 1 ' OPTIONAL PLATFORMS AND PLATFORM ACCESSORIES PLATFORM LINERS To facilitate periodic electrical HYDRAULIC PLATFORM ROTATORS single-man testing and provide additional insulation, bucket side-hung platforms can be equipped with liners are available for both the two-man basket and hydraulically powered rotators. Each rotator's the one-man basket. These liners are constructed installation consists of a hydraulically powered motor from Iow density polyethylene with ultra violet and special linkage with a control valve. inhibitor added. Each new liner is tested at 50,000 volts AC RMS for one minute. The liner has a A PLATFORM TILT SYSTEM FOR SIDE-HUNG minimum ~.&' wall thickness. PLATFORMS provides for easy horizontal tilt by pulling pin and lifting a release lever. The tilt system PLATFORM COVERS Platform covers for one-man enables ease of personnel rescue and basket debris buckets are made from reinforced vinyl m~terial clean-out. which is waterproof and has exceptional resistance to chafing and teadng. The cover is attached, by FIBERGLASS TOOL TRAYS which attach to the means of a drawstring, under the top lip of the upper edge of the platform and hang inside or basket. These covers are easily stored when not in outside the platform can be provided by TECO. use. FIBERGLASS PLATFORM COVERS Made of molded fiberglass high gloss white finish. The cover r~s over the platform rim and straps around the platform. Eliminates the sagging characteristic of vinyl covers. Fiberglass platform covers are available for one-man platforms. TECO'S 'I~/O-MAN ROTATING PLATFORM allows the operator to work in a wide variety of positions. The platform mounts close to the boom for easy reach of the jib and has a narrow profile for working in tight situations. TITAN MATERIAL LIFTING SYSTEM MATERIAL LIFTING WINCH AND JiB WITH MORE CAPACITY AND GREATER VERSATIMTY. The TITAN is designed for material lifting and a winch and jib installation is available. The winch and jib is installed at the platform area thus eliminating a winch line running the length of the upper boom and possibly affecting the dielectric qualities of the upper fiberglass boom. This installation is designed for use on the TITAN unit with either one side-hung platform or two side-hung platforms. When the winch and jib assembly is installed with two (2) side-hung platforms it is located between the platform and boom opposite the platform with the platform control. The jib has a total attitude adjustment of 180° to facilitate use in any position of the upper boom for matedal lifting or conductor lifting. The jib attitude adjustment can be either manual or hydraulically powered. The jib is 4' x 4' square and five (5) feet long. It is constructed of fiberglass and has excellent insulating strength. The TITAN unit has excellent matedal lifting characteristics because of its high capacities and because the rated load can be moved with the unit booms as well as the jib and winch. The jib features a double sheave design which enables the unit to lift matedal in the overcenter positions as well as the non-overcenter position. The sheave head assembly on the jib can be easily removed and replaced with an adapter socket to receive a single conductor holder or lifting arm for multiple conductor lifting. The lifting capacity of the winch and jib depends on the angle of the 'nTAN booms and the jib (refer to chart below). However, the winch and jib has a maximum lift capacity of 2000 lbs. The winch is a heavy duty worm and worm gear drive, self-locking and requires no manual adjustment brake. The controls for the jib and winch are specially located so that they can be easily actuated from either platform in any position of the booms-overcenter or non-overcenter. The winch and jib installation is complete with a boom lifting chart and a jib lifting chart and both can be read easily by the operator. The following charts represent TITAN upper boom lifting capacities of man and material. No deductions are necessan/for jib, winch, platforms, platform liners, or platform rotators. TITAN MATERIAL LIFTING SYSTEM NON-OVERCENTER 1750/(794 kg) 1600/(726 kg) 1250/(567 kg) 1050/(476 kg) HorizontaJ and Oown 15 deg. and up 1850/(839 kg) 1750/{794 kg) 1400/(635 kg) 1100/(499 kg) 30 d~g. and up 2100/(953 kg) 1900/(862 kg) 1530/(694 kg) 1250/'(567 kg) 45 deg. and up 2300/(1043 kg) 2150/(975 kg) 1990/(903 kg) 1700/(771 kg) 60 deg. and up 2400/(1089 kg) 2300/(1043 kg) 2150/(975 kg) 2100/(953 kg) 75 deg. and up 2450/(1112 kg) 2450/(1112 kg) 2260/(1025 kg) 2150/(975 kg) Verfica~ 2500/(1134 kg) 2500/(1134 kg) 2300/(1043 kg) 2300/(1043 kg) TITAN T5 SPECIFICATIONS PAGE TITAN MATERIAL LIFTING SYSTEM (Con't.) ~J O~RCE~R 21~/(~ kg) ~/(~7 kg) 1~/(816 kg) 17~1 kg) ~[ 75 d~. and up ~ d~. ~d up 1~/(816 kg) 1~/~03 kg) 1~/(612 kg) 11~/(4~ kg) ~ deg. ~d up 1~/(~ kg) I~/(~ kg) 11~(4~ kg) 1~/(~ kg) ~ d~. ~d up 1~/(~ ~g) 11~/{4~ kg) ~/(~ kg) ~/(~ kg) 15 deg. ~d up 11~/(~ kg) 1~/(476 kg) ~/(~ kg) 7~/(~ kg) Ho~o~ & ~wn 11~1(~ ~9) 1~/(~ kg) ~/~ kg) I 7~/(316 kg) NON-OVERCENTER 1900/(862 kg) 1750/(794 kg) 1400/(635 kg) 1200/(544 kg) Horizontal snd Down 15 deg. and up 2000/(907 kg) 1900/(862 kg) 1550/(703 kg) 1250/(657 kg) 30 deg. and up 2250/(1021 kg) 2050/(930 kg) 1680/(762 kg) 1400/(635 kg) 45 deg. end up 2450/(1112 kg) 2300/(1043 kg) 2140/(971 kg) 1850/(839 kg) 60 deg. and up 2550/(1157 kg) 2450/(1112 kg) 2300~/(1043 kg) 2250/(1021 kg) 75 deg. end up 2600/(1179 kg) 2600/(1179 kg) 2410/(1093 kg) 23~0/(1043 kg) Vertical 2650/(1202 kg) 2650/(1202 kg) 2450/(1112 kg) 2450/(1112 kg) OVERCENTER 2250/(1021 kg) 2150/(97'5 kg) 1900/(862 kg) 1850/(839 kg) 75 deg. and up 60 deg. snd up 1950/(885 kg) 1700/(771 kg) 1500/(680 kg) 1250/(567 kg) 45 deg. and up 1550/(703 kg) 1450/(658 kg) 1250/(567 kg) 1150/(522 kg) 30 deg. and up 1350/(612 kg) 1250/(567 kg) 1050/(476 kg) 950/(431 kg) 15 deg. and up 1300/(590 kg) 1200/(544 kg) 1000/(454 kg) 900/(408 kg) Horizontal & Down 1250/(567 kg) 1150/(522 kg) kg) 850/(386 kg) ENGINEERING. 't'he ~ha~t below represents T~TAN upper boom tip 'BARE SHAFT' I'~ing capac~es. To establish true man and material lifting capacities deduct the weight of components as listed Jn the 'Plstform Are~ Components Weight Schedule' below: S'1'5-11-96 TITAN T5 SPECIFICATIONS PAGE 9 BARE SHAFT CAPACITIES NON-OVERCENTER 2300 2150 1800 1600 Horizontal and Down (1043 kg) (975 kg) (816 kg) (726 kg) 15 deg, and up 2400 2300 1950 1650 (1089 kg) (1043 kg) (885 kg) (748 kg) 30 deg. and up 2650 2450 2080 1800 (1202 kg) (1112 kg) (943 kg) (816 kg) 45 deg. and up 2850 2700 2540 2250 (1293 kg) (1225 kg) (1152 kg) (1020 kg) 60 deg. and up 2950 2850 2700 2650 (1338 kg) (1293 kg) (1225 kg) (1202 kg) 75 deg. and up 3000 3000 2810 2700 (1361 kg) (1361 kg) (1275 kg) (1225 kg) Vertical 3050 3050 2850 2850 (1383 kg) (1383 kg) (1293 kg) (1293 kg) OVERCENTER 2650 2550 2350 2250 75 deg. and up (1202 kg) (1157 kg) (1066 kg) (1020 kg) 60 deg. and up 2350 2100 1900 1650 (1066 kg) (953 kg) (862 kg) (748 kg) 45 deg. and up 1950 1850 1650 1550 (885 kg) (839 kg) (748 kg) (703 kg) 30 deg. and up 1750 1650 1450 1350 (794 kg) (748 kg) (658 kg) (612 kg) 15 deg. and up 1700 1600 1400 1300 (771 kg) (726 kg) (635 kg) (590 kg) Horizontal and Down 1650 1550 1350 1250 (748 kg) (703 kg) (612 kg) (567 kg) The above capacities represent nominal figures for minimum ballast and chassis requirements, if higher capacities are required, contact TECO ENGINEERING. TITAN T5 SPECIFICATIONS PAGE 10 TITAN MATERIAL LIFTING SYSTEM (Con't.) Jib and Winch Ass'y w/Manual Powered Jib 232 lbs. (105.2 kg) Jib and Winch Ass'y w/Hydraulic Powered Jib 246 lbs. (111.9 kg) Side-Hung Platform w/Controls 83 lbs. (37.6 kg) Side Hung Platform w/o Controls 75 lbs. (34.0 kg) Bucket Rotator (Manual) 35 lbs. (15.9 kg) Bucket Rotator (Hydraulic) 45 lbs. (20.4 kg) Each Bucket Liner 40 lbs. (18.1 kg) Each Platform Tilt Installation 23 lbs. (10.4 kg) CONDUCTOR LIFTING EQUIPMENT JIB POLE ADAPTERS FOR ATTACHING CONDUCTOR EFTING EQUIPMENT can be CONDUCTOR UFTING EQUIPMENT can be easily specified for either single wire lifting or cross arms pinned on the jib end by first removing the sheave for multiple wire lifting. The cross arms are complete assembly. TECO can provide jib adapters which will with three (3) wire holders, bracing, clamps, and jib enable the user to install single or multiple conductor end adapters. All assemblies are complete, with lifting equipment manufactured by Keamey, installed lifting charts. Bodendieckor Chance. Charts for material lifting are installed at the platform area and can be easily read by the operator. OTHER OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT EMERGENCY LOWERING PUMP INSTALLATION for access to the walkway. A truck with a minimum provides back-up power in case the truck engine or cab axle dimension of 102' is required and it is hydraulic pump fails. It enables the operator to highly recommended that, if a utility body is lower the unit slowly to a folded position, specified, it have an access opening and steps behind the cab on the right (curb) side. This type of The installation consists of a 12 voit DC electrical mounting has the advantage of better access and motor driven pump which operates off the truck usage of the body bed at the rear. It also provides battery, a hydraulic pressure switch, and a normally for mounting space of accessory equipment. open relay activated by the safety powerlock system. If a pressure failure occurs in the hydraulic system, OUTRIGGER AND BOOM INTERLOCK SYSTEM the hydraulic pressure switch which is set at 400 psi insures that the outriggers are lowered sufficiently activates the DC electric pump and the pump can close to the ground before the booms and turntable then be activated by one of the safety powerlock become operational. This optional installation actuators to lower the unit for travel, provides for a limit switch installed at each outrigger and wired into the Safety Powerlock System. This emergency pump is not designed for continuous use, but only as an emergency back-up ENGINE START/STOP CONTROL AT THE to the main hydraulic system. PLATFORM enables the operator to stop and start the chassis engine. This feature facilitates easy HYDRAUMC TOOL LINE INSTALLATION with control so that the chassis engine does not idle for hydraulic tool pressure lines and outlet studs at the platform and/or base is an TITAN option. 3/8' male long periods of time while the platform is positioned at the work area. quick disconnect studs for pressure and return outlets for connecting one (1) or two (2) tools can be SEALED UPPER BOOM WITH DEHUMIDIFIER installed at the platform and/or base. Closed center prevents entry of dirt and moisture into the upper and open center tools can be used with this boom. To prevent condensation inside the boom a hydraulic system, de-humidifier is installed into the side of the boom near the lower end. This dehumidifer cartridge REVERSE MOUNTED UNIT installation requires no consists of a perforated canister filled with silica gel change in the pedestal or outrigger except the crystals treated with a humidity indicating chemical mounting location. Instead of the pedestal being mountedoverthe rear axle of the truck, it is mounted dye. A plexiglass outer cover permits easy visual inspection of the color of the silica gel. A blue color directly behind the truck cab. The outriggers instead indicates the interior of the boom is dry. When the of being mounted behind the rear wheels, are color tums to pink, humidity inside the boom has located when the unit is reverse mounted, risen significantly enough to require that the canister approximately rive (5) feet behind the truck cab and be baked in an oven to dry out the silica gel or that attached directly to the pedestal riser. The booms in the silica gel be replaced. the stored travel position extend toward the rear of the truck and the platform is located over the truck cab. It is necessary to raise the pedestal by mounting it on a structural spacer. The outrigger controls are relocated to the curb side of the pede,~-tal. If a cab guard is not specified, a walkway must be provided over the cab on the curb side and a ladder is located behind the cab on the curb side TITAN T5 SPECIFICATIONS PAGiE I OTHER OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT (Con't.) SIMCONE COATING INSIDE THE UPPER BOOM TRUCK GROUNDING KIT includes a reel with 75 ft. AND/OR LOWER BOOM INSERT: this consists of of #2-600 volt copper cable w~th ferrule and ground a coating of Dow Corning #5 silicone grease 1/32' to clamp on one end and reel at~aching terminal on the 1/16' thick over the entire inner surface of the boom other end. Must be installed per Keamey Product and ail components passing through the boom. The Data Sheet #27A-R. inside surface of the TITAN upper boom is smoothand resists dirt or moisture. Some customers ELECTRICAL MONITOR AND AUDIO WARNING request the added feature of the silicone grease includes a micro ammeter for measuring electrical coating inside the booms, which is available with the leakage in upper boom and an audio alarm for unit. warning if leakage exceeds maximum setting. BOOM CORONA SHIELD FOR HIGHER UPPER OTHER OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT FOR THE TITAN BOOM DIELECTRIC RATING is available. The such as auxiliary power systems, air compressor H~AN upper boom is tested at the factory and systems for pressure, chip boxes, utility bodies, certified to 69 KV, however, higher KV ratings can be warning systems, tool compartments may be provided when specified, available in addition to the listed options. Contact TECO, Inc. with individual specification to check on VACUUM FLASH OVER PROTECTION is provided availabil~'y and quotations. standard with the TITAN by installing check valves in all hydraulic lines muted through the booms. However, if specified, atmospheric vent valves can also be installed in hydraulic lines at the boom tip. TECO reserves the ~ight to improve models end change specifications without notice. STS-11-96 jan-O4-Uo 03:0~P Air Tec Equipment 360 696 1553 P.04 Pm~red for, air tec/ c~t¥ of blaine CHEVY TRUCK Vehicle Summary WEIGHTS (L55} ,CODE MODEL AND, FACTORy, OPTIONS .... F R,O,,HT REAR ?0DO Z000 C?H042 4,158 RQ2 Tru~ A~lk~atfofl. 0 D dE4 ARS ~ brake ~ystem, cam typo brakes (Me~r O Plus w~ 15" 11 SO ~es~um ~ming Rght ~ alum, a~ f~l d~t S~I. ~r W~ I~ - 14~ ~ ;~. (23.5 I~. J~dea manual dm~ ~. se~ tank - 1~ ~ ~ (2~.5 IRe0. R~t se~ rank - 14~ ~. in. (23.~ ::LEO. 0~ ~t~ ~a~ d~s asgard, LSZ 7~ L Cet 3126B O~, 230 Gm~s he. ~ ~ r~ (4~ ~. in.). ~2S 24 Tu~h~e~Afle~o~. ~ lb fl gm~ ~que ~ 1~0 ~m. NPT Slng~ ve~l R,H. taitpipe. Honings m~er. AIU~ steel 3 3 KNB D~ ~ air ~ea~, ~a~n brand. Fi~ermin~r mouNed on air 0 0 cleaner. ~4 Bl~ heat~, 1~0 ~. Includes el~l ~rd ~ 1~0 var plug & 2 0 TM0 ~a} b~es, 18~ ~ ~anki~ ~ps. O~ ~ 31-~ 2 amos ~ ~a~ ~ ~ -18 ~gmes C. G~n~ d~ly to s~er. KGB 130~p ~t~er. O~ Remy21 SL 4 0 UER I a~er a~d e~l~ al~. L~ gll pmseU~ & ~g~ wamr 0 o t~¢ ~ ga~' la.ale light & bu~. L~ wat~ MP~ 6 ~ ~m~c, ~0P A~n. Gro~ ~e ~tin9; 8~ lb ~, 435 112 InclUdes ~ dash m~nl~ ~sh~u~ ~ ~r and HXB, HPK ~ HPP a~ el~ b~mes an ~EO and may No Clu~fh A~. 0 minimum ~ ~R ~f 11 ,~ lbs. ~en us~ ~ hub ~d ~fs ~d RQ3 e~l~n. ~ui~ m~um ~ont G~ of 12,0~ t~. I~u~s R~e ~W TA~5 ge~ ~ int~l ~r PM0 14,~0 lb ~t sus~nsi~. Uual ~ In.es front ~ a~omer;. 178 4 HPG ~,~ b Dsna S~ ~e ~ ~0~S In~s 7~-~ lyn~t~ 0 1 tub~, improv~ ~p m~ts. mag~e~: d~ln p~g e~ NarWhal air tec I eib/of biain~ G_ODE MO_DEL'AND_FACTORY OPTIONS. _ ,,. , FROHT RI~ 015 R~: f ~8.17 0 0 ~VC & 8~ am ~ ~d ~eer p~ NO P~ Se ~ull B~ FmnL O 0 ~2U Up~ ~ ~- ~e 0 o R~ Tu~ , 0 o Pmp~m~ for:. ~ t~ I ~ ~f ~nc ~OE ~ ~D FA~Y O~HG : ~0~ R~i~ Tcbel~ o o 8~1 Dm= ~ ~ P~ R~r. 0 0 ~PR (S~O)~xS.~ ~e. ~ D)~I~I Hubert Re3r. O 15 ~ ~ In~ ~ ~ ~ T~. e~r Mud ~y ~ s~o~- .. :' 6:~ "' ~,o2s FRONT ~: 14,~ lb TOTAL ~: ~,~ ~ Service B<~k~ · 'Fr~ile~" A~d Lifts * Digger 42(~ ~ Fr,ai~ V~lcy ~d, V~cou~l, WA 98fi60 BUS. (360) 690-0000 F~ (~) 6~- 155:% 3ack Daly Celt (3~) ~323 1999 ,'b)' Tcc' Eq~men6 I~;c'. 1200 Nx, V F~ uit V;dley Road~.~m~c'oUi;e~, gVA 9866O TIP TEST POR T 2/20/ox II JOB ~: 1127 DATE TESTED: UNIT TESTED: Titan T5LOHA IISERIAL ~: 8~950005 MANUFACTURER: MTI IIMODEL: TSHA CHASSIS: G~ - Chevy C-7 HO42 IIPLAT~ORM Cap.: 350~ , , , AMOUNT OF WEIGHT TESTED ON LEVEL GROUND: 525~ AMOUNT OF WEIGHT TESTED ON 5 DEGREE SLOPE: 465~ POUNDS OF BALLAST REQUIRED: -O- :~NTS: C~ O~ BLAINE PIJSLIC WORKS D[PARTMENT WASHINGTON, U.S.A. UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMO DATE: May 13, 2003 TO: UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM: Larry Dunbar, Power Resources Manager SUBJECT: Conservation Program Rebate Adjustments Summary: The City has offered its utility customers participation in the Bonneville Power kdministration Conservation and Renewables Discount program since June 1, 2001. Customer >articipation in the program, which is available through September 30, 2006, is 10.6% above ~here it should be. There is a need to make appropriate adjustments to the program including owering rebates for energy conservation improvements. The Bonneville Power Administration ~i11 be announcing program changes soon that are anticipated to reduce program expenditures. Recommendation: For information only, no action requested. Background: On April 12, 2001, the City Council authorized the Director of Public Works and Utilities to implement an energy conservation program that qualifies for the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Conservation and Renewables Discount (C&RD) program. The BPA C&RD program provides rebates to customers for electrical energy conservation improvements. Analysis: The City's C&RD program officially began on October 1, 2001 and concludes September 30, 2006. The City's expenses under the C&RD program qualify towards a credit against the City's BPA wholesale power bill. The City currently receives a credit in the amount of $24,017 on its monthly BPA wholesale power bill to implement the C&RD program. City energy conservation program expenses beyond the BPA C&RD would have to be financed by the City and would have an impact on electrical rates. As of April 30, 2003 customer participation in the C&RD program was 10.6% above the performance target. If customer participation remains constant the budget is anticipated to be fully utilized by June 2005 (16 months early). A key reason customer participation is above the performance target was the 2001 energy crisis. The City began the C&RD program three-months ahead of schedule to help satisfy customer needs and interests during the energy crisis. Another reason customer participation is above the performance target is there have been over 2,000 City customer inquiries made and "word of month" advertising has been significant. BPA is scheduled to armonnce changes to the C&RD program by mid-July (the changes will be in effect October 1,2003) that are anticipated to reduce program expenditures. BPA funding nnder the C&RD program should be managed by the City to ensure that it's available for the entire five-year program period. Staffwill return to the Utility Advisory Committee in August to share information on BPA program changes and adjustments to the City's program. pORT WASHINGTON, U.S.A. UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMO DATE: June 10, 2003 To: UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM: Stephen Sperr, Engineering Manager RE: Amendment No. 2 to the Consultant Agreement with Skillings-Connolly, Contract #22-02 Summary: It is necessary to amend the agreement with Skillings~Connolly to provide engineering services related to the elimination of sewage pump station #1, as well as providing for directed services as needed. A scope and budget for the work has been negotiated. Recommendation: Forward a favorable recommendation to Council authorizing the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $70,385.39 to Skillings-Connolly, Inc. for a total contract amount not to exceed $256,937.41. Background/Analysis: The original agreement for professional services with Skillings-Connolly for engineering design services for various water and wastewater projects was approved on May 21, 2002. The agreement included a scope and budget for Tasks 1 and 2, with a total not to exceed $150,200.98. Additional tasks were anticipated but no agreement on scope or price was included. Amendment No.1 to the agreement was signed July 17, 2002, adding a scope and budget for Task 3, the design of various sewer main replacement projects. The revised total contract amount was increased to $186,552.02, and the performance period extended to August 31, 2003. It is now proposed that two more tasks he added to this agreement. The City has negotiated a revision to the Wastewater Treatment Plant's (WWTP) National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit that allows the City to delay until the end of 2004 the elimination of the CSO outfall at pump station #1. Task 4 will involve the design ora gravity sewer from pump station gl to pump station #3, eliminating the need for pump station #1 as well as the CSO outfall there. Task 5 will be for directed services. This will allow the City to direct Skillings-Connolly to complete various smaller engineering tasks not originally anticipated. Examples of this would be DSWPLM EMOS\june I 0 Amend Skillings-Connolly Agm..wpd June 10, 2003 UAC Meeting Amendment No. 2 to the Consultant Agreement with Skillings-Connolly Page 2 of 2 flow modeling of a section of our sewer system to analyze the impact of a proposed development, or assisting in the design of repairs to a failure in a part of the water or wastewater collection system. Below is a table outlining the budget for each task. Task Wastewater Utility Original Task Revised or New Task Budget* Amount Amount 1. Front Street Water $24,500.62 $28,885.93 $24,500.62 Main -done 2. Peabody Creek $150,000.00 $121,315.05 $100,000.00 Water Main 3. Sewer $40,000.00 $36,351.04 $17,500.00 Replacement/Repair 4. Crown Park Storm $84,713.45 N/A $74,936.79 & Sanitary Sewer 5. Directed Services $50,000.00 N/A $40,000.00 TOTAL $349,214.07 $186,552.02 $256,937.41 Note that Task 1 was funded in the 2002 budget, and tasks 2-5 in the 2003 budget Staff has been pleased with Skillings-Connolly's performance to date and is recommending that City Council authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement. Amendment No. 2 will increase the total contract amount from $186,552.02 to $256,937.41, and extend the time of performance to January 31, 2004. Attachment: Location Map D:\WP~MEMOS~jun¢ 10 Amend Skilling$-Connolly Agm~t.wpd F~S #1 CITY OF PORT ANGELES SCALE PUBUC WORXS ¢000' Crown Pork ~C~orrnwc/~er c/nc/ p~c//? ~cewer ~ 500' Ptot 3(zte~ June 4, 2003 Revision ~)O,%E~: Crownsewerlocotlonmop. DWO~_ WASHINGTON, U.S.A. UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMO DATE: June 10, 2003 TO: UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM: Stephen Sperr, Engineering Manager RE: Update on Combined Sewer Overflow Events Summary: The 2002 Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Report was recently sent to the Department of Ecology (DOE), as required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System 0XTPDES) permit for the City's wastewater treatment plant. A summary of this report and correlation between rainfall and CSO events is discussed herein. Recommendation: For information only. Background/Analysis: The City has five Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) sites that require monitoring as part of the WasteWater Treatment Plant's (WWTP) National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The five CSO discharge ouffalls are as follows: 001 - Pump Station #1, discharge into Strait of Juan De Fuca 006 - Oak & Railroad, discharge into Port Angeles Harbor 007 - Laurel & Railroad, discharge into Port Angeles Harbor 008 - 2nd & Lincoln, discharge into culvert for Peabody Creek, outlet into Port Angeles Harbor 010 - Francis Street (East Manhole), discharge into Port Angeles Harbor Up until February 11, 2002, the CSO sites were continuously monitored by Marsh-McBirney T50 Flow Recorders. Data from these flow meters was downloaded to a laptop computer every month. On February 11, all five Marsh-McBimey units were replaced with Geotivity RMI1100 flow recorders. For the first nine months, data was downloaded monthly to a laptop by City employees. In October 2002 a service contract was started with Geotivity where they download the raw data, verify the data, and convert it to a format that can produce reports of varying length, as well as graphs. The NPDES permit also requires that an annual report be submitted to DOE that summarizes the frequency and volume of CSO events, CSO reduction accomplishments and CSO projects planned for the following year. Attached is a table from the 2002 report that shows CSO events by location and month for the year 2002. D:\WP~vlEMOS\june I 0 CSO Events Update.wpd June 10, 2003 UAC Meeting CSO Update Page 2 of 2 Also attached is a graph showing the monthly number of CSO events for the last four years, with an overlay of corresponding rainfall. While increases in CSO events usually correspond with increased rainfall, this is not always the case. There may be few CSO events in a month, but each event may have been of long duration and volume, corresponding to a heavy rainfall event. From an environmental point of view, the volume of combined sewer overflows is of major concern. However, from a regulatory point of view, i.e. DOE's enforcement of the NPDES permit, the number of events is the most critical. The NPDES permit requires that the City have a plan to reduce CSO events to no more than one event per CSO outfall per year by the year 2015. With input and review by City staff, Brown & Caldwell will evaluate different options on how best to accomplish this as part of amending the existing CSO Comprehensive Reduction Plan, as well as developing a Collection System Maintenance and Replacement Plan. These plans will be brought to the UAC for discussion before they are finalized. Attachments: Table of 2002 CSO events Graph of monthly events vs. rainfall D:\WPqVIEMOS\juneIO CSO Events Update.wpd pORTANGELES W A S H I N G T O N, LI. $. A. IJTIL[TY ADVISORY GOMMITTEE MEMO DATE: June 10, 2003 TO: UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM: Stephen Sperr, Engineering Manager RE: Phase 1, Septage Receiving Station Summary: Currently, there are no locations in Clallam County that accept septage for treatment and disposal. The City and County have discussed funding a septage receiving station at the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). A station can be installed and operational at a minimum initial cost, with a plan to add capacity and additional appurtenances as more funding is obtained. Recommendation: None. For information and discussion. Background/Analysis: There are no locations in Clallam County that accept septic tank solids, liquids and greases (septage) for treatment and disposal. Commercial septic tank haulers in Clallam County must take their loads to either Port Townsend or Shelton for proper disposal. Both the City and Clallam County are interested in developing a septage receiving station at the City's WWTP. Siting a station at the WWTP would result in an additional revenue stream for the Wastewater Utility and lower costs for local commercial haulers. The City's consultant, Brown & Caldwell, has been working with the City's public works staff to develop some alternatives for the installation ora septage receiving station at the WWTP. The recommendation is that an operational station can be installed adjacent to Rayonier's leachate receiving station at minimal cost. Euture improvements to the station can be made after actual use of the station is monitored and evaluated. Improvements to add capacity and permanent structures can be made as funds are identified. This would be a two phase process. Phase 1 involves the addition of a 5hp pump, piping and controls to the existing leachate receiving station. The septage will be pumped directly to the headworks of the WWTP, using existing piping. The cost would be $5,000 - $10,000. This does not include property lease or acquisition costs, which are still unknown. Phase 2 would expand the septage receiving station to include additional storage capacity, a biofilter for odor control, upgrades to the access road, and other appurtenances to make the N:\UAC\Final\junel 0 Septage Receimng Stalion.wpd June 10, 2003 UAC Meeting Septage Receiving Station Page 2 of 2 facility permanent. The cost to complete this phase would range from $250,00 - $500,000, depending on how much storage capacity is built into the facility and how much of the operation is automated. There is $240,000 in the 2003 Wastewater Utility budget for the design and construction of a septage receiving station. If staff proceeds with the installation of the first phase ofa septage receiving station, once it is operational the actual use of the station and its impact on the operations of the WWTP will be monitored. Concurrently, the City will investigate the possibility of cost shar/ng with the County the installation of the second phase of the station to increase capacity and make it a more permanent facility. The balance of the $240,000 not spent on the first phase can then go towards the City's portion of the cost of the second phase. It is recommended that the UAC concur with staff's recommendation to install the first phase of a septage receiving station, contingent on the negotiation of a reasonable price for acquisition or lease of Rayonier property. Use of the station will be monitored as it relates to impact and revenue, and a cost sharing agreement for the implementation of the second phase of station construction will be negotiated with the County. Before the second phase is initiated, the issue will be brought back to the UAC for review and discussion. N:\UAC~FinaI~ une I 0 Septage Receiv/ng S~ation.wpd WASHINGTON, U.S.A. UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMO DATE: June 10, 2003 TO: UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM: Scott McLain, Deputy Director for Power Systems RE: Electric Utility Reserves Report Summary: At the May 13, 2003 Utility Advisory Committee meeting, UAC requested an update on various projects that had been authorized to use electric reserve funds but had not been previously budgeted. Projects include the fiber optics project, the Laurel Street slide repair, the oil handling warehouse, and a few other very small projects. [~ecommendation: Information only. Background/Analysis: Several projects have been recommended by UAC and authorized by City Council over the past year that have utilized electric utility reserve funds above what had been planned for during the budget process. The budget process begins mid-year each year and is adopted shortly before the end of that year. The budgets amounts may not exactly match the project costs as more complete information or better options become available when contracts are actually negotiated for the projects. This is when projects are brought before UAC and City Council for changes when costs are above previous estimates or budgets. Projects that have been authorized for additional or unbudgeted funds during the past year include the Laurel Street slide repair for about $50,000, the oil handling warehouse for an additional $45,000, and the fiber optics I-net project. This project has evolved over the past two years with the City's financial participation in the project of about $894,000. The electric fund will recover the majority of this investment over the next 15 years as customers utilize the fiber optic system. There were also several minor unbudgeted expenditures for items such as consultants for work on PUD/CPI fiber intercormection, the cable TV franchise renewal and the subsequent transfer to Wave Broadband. The latter two projects were mostly reimbursed by the applicants. N:/UAC~Final\uac061003 elec~c reservesl .wpd WASHINGTON, U.S.A. UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMO DATE: June 10, 2003 TO: UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM: Gary W. Kenworthy P.E., Deputy Director of Public Works and Utilities/City Engineer RE: Stormwater Utility Discussion Summary: At the request of the UAC, staffis providing information from last year's efforts to form a Stormwater Utility to facilitate discussion. [Recommendation: None, information provided for discussion purposes. Background/Analysis: At the May UAC meeting it was requested that staff provide materials for discussion regarding last year's efforts to form a Stormwater Utility. The following materials are attached for review and discussion: 1. Stormwater Utility, Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption memo dated September 17, 2002 (includes final draft ordinance) 2. Stormwater Utility, Public Hearing memo dated September 3, 2002 (includes final draft ordinance endorsed by UAC) 3. Proposed Stormwater Utility Budget dated July 29, 2002 4. Proposed Stormwater Program dated August 9, 2002 5. Stormwater Utility Fee and Revenue Initial Projections updated July 30, 2002 6. Capital Projects list from September 2002 presentation at Council 7. 2003-2009 Capital Facilities Projects (Wastewater and Stormwater Projects) 8. Section 4.6 Facilities, Solutions and Costs of Drainage Control, Engineering and Economic Services, Inc. study dated 1996. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, establishing a stormwater utility, establishing a monthly stormwater utility charge, designating ~ stormwater regulations and provisions for the management and operation of the stormwater utility, and amending Ordinance 2394 and Ch. 13.63 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Ordinance 2394 and Chapter 13.63 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code are hereby amended by amending Chapter 13.63 PAMC to read as follows: Chapter 13.63 STORMWATER - REGULATIONS AND UTILITY Sections: 13.63.005 Purpose. 13.63.010 Stormwater Discharge Not Permitted. 13.63.020 Unpolluted Discharge Shall Have Approved Outlet. 13.63.030 Stormwater Connection Not Permitted in Sanitary System. 13.63.040 Utility established. 13.63.050 Jurisdiction. 13.63.060 ~ opernfi°n nnd Management, 13.63.070 Transfer of property. 13.63.080 Definitions. 13.63.090 Monthly charge 13.63.100 Private stormwater retention system rate reduction. 13.63.110 Application for rate reductions - Appeal. 13.63.120 Billing and payment. 13.63.130 Remedies. 13.63.140 Inspections - Right of entry - Emergency. -1- 13.63.005 Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to establish a storm and surface water management program in order to accomplish the following goals: A_~. to promote sound development policies and construction procedures, which respect and preserve the City's watercourses; B..~. to minimize water quality degradation and control of sedimentation of creeks, streams, ponds, and other water bodies; C~. to protect property owners adiacent to developing and developed land from increased runoff rates, which could cause erosion of abutting property; to protect downstream owners; to preserve and enhance the suitability of waters for contact recreation and fishing; E__. to preserve and enhance the aesthetic quality of waters; to provide public education, outreach, participation, and involvement in protection of water quality; G._~. to maintain safe City streets and rights-of-way; and H__~. to decrease drainage-related damage to public and private property. The storm and surface water management program shall consist of stormwater regulations and a stormwater utility, which shall be implemented and operated by the City's Department of Public Works and Utilities in accordance with standards established by the appropriate governmental entities with iurisdiction. 13.63.010 Stormwater Discharge Not Permitted. No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged any stormwater, surface water, ground water, roof runoff, subsurface drainage, uncontaminated cooling water, or unpolluted industrial process waters into any sanitary sewer, unless otherwise approved by the Director. (Ord. 2394 Ch. IV §1, 6/2/86) 13.63.020 Unpolluted Discharge Shall Have Approved Outlet. Stormwater and all other unpolluted drainage shall be discharged to such sewers as are specifically designated as combined sewers or storm sewers, or to a natural outlet approved by the Director. Industrial cooling water or unpolluted process waters may be discharged on approval of the Director to a storm sewer or natural outlet. (Ord. 2394 Ch. IV §2, 6/2/86) 13.63.030 Stormwater Connection Not Permitted in Sanitary System. A. No person shall make connection of roof downpours, exterior fotmdation drains, -2- area drains, or other sources of stormwater surface runoff or groundwater to a building sewer or building drain which in turn is connected directly or indirectly to a public sanitary sewer, unless such connection is otherwise approved by the Director. B. Storm drainage from hard-surfaced or graded areas, such as parking lots, service station yards, and storage yards, shall enter the public storm sewer system or other outlet approved by the Director and as required by this Chapter and as such facilities are available. Such storm drainage shall not be connected to or enter a sanitary sewer, unless otherwise approved. (Ord. 2394 Ch. IV §3, 6/2/86) 13.63.040 Stormwater Utility established. There is created and established a storm and surface water utility (also referred to as the "stormwater utility"). The stormwater utility shall be administered under direction of the Director of Public Works and Utilities. The stormwater utility shall perform the functions, and have the authority, as set forth in Chapter 35.67 RCW for managing, regulating, and controlling the City's stormwater management program. 13.63.050 Jurisdiction. The City shall have jurisdiction over all storm and surface water facilities within the City's boundaries. No modifications or additions shall be made to the City's storm and surface water facilities without the prior approval of the City. 13.63.060 PlamAdoptcd Operation a d Management. A. The stormwater utility shall be managed and operated in accordance with: (1) the Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Economic and Engineering Services Inc. dated June 1996 and adopted by the City Council on December 17, 1996, and (2) applicable sections of the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines.dated B. The eff¢Cfi-v-~ dam ,,f a&,pti,)ii £vz City wffi consider adootinl the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington or its equivalent in the event either/o~ the NPDES permit t,, ~ is issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology to the City of Port Angeles, w~,.. ,~.,~ ...... o~ ,,,~ o,,,,~,~. ,~o~ ~v.,~,,..,,, ~,,,,.~ which requwes :such adopfio , or (2) _ ~ I ..... a Clallam County Salmon Recover~ Plan includes adoption ofa stormwater manual ,~,,m,-,,- ~l--~-~,~ ~o~ ,~,~.~.~.-~,~ tn order to comply with the Endangered Species Act pursuant to the National Marine Fisheries Service's 4(d) role for Puget Sound chinook salmon, --:'-'-'- ..... ~'--"--- '~'-: ...... -3- C. If and when ~ the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington is adopted b~'m~a~eff~'~l~, the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines shall be revised to reflect the provisions of the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington and to take into account any exceptions to the those provisions necessary to reflect the City's particular conditions. 13.63.070 Transfer of property. All equipment, properties and property rights and interests owned or held by the City, however acquired, insofar as they relate to or concern storm or surface water sewage, are hereby transferred to the stormwater utility. This includes by way of examples and not limitation, all properties and property rights and interests acquired by adverse possession or by prescription in and to the drainage and storage of storm or surface waters over and under lands, watercourses, streams, ponds and sloughs to the full extent of inundation caused by the largest storm or flood condition. 13.63.080 Definitions. The following definitions shall apply to this Chapter: A_~. "Commercial/multiple property" means all property zoned or used for multifamily, commercial, retail, public, government, non-profit, and all other non-residential uses. "Impervious area" means any part of any parcel of land that has been modified by the action of persons to reduce the land's natural ability to absorb and hold rainfall. This includes areas which have been cleared, graded, paved or compacted. Excluded, however, are all vegetaterl areas sUch as lawns, agricultural areas, and landscaped areas. C.~. "Single -family and duplex properPd' means and includes all property used for single family and duplex residential uses. 13.63.90 Monthly Charge. A_~. Effective January 1, 2003, the owners of all real property in the City shall pay a monthly stormwater utility charge at the rate as set forth in this Section. B__: Single-family and duplex residential fees. The monthly stormwater utility charge for each single-family and duplex residential property shall be $ 3.00. C__:. The monthly stormwater utility charge for all commercial/multiple property shall be calculated by dividing the total impervious area in square feet by 4000 square feet, with the result rounded down to the whole number, times the single family and duplex residential fee. The minimum monthly fee for a commercial/multiple property shall be not less than the monthly fee for a single-family dwelling, and the maximum monthly fee shall be not more than $30.00. D_~. City streets, State highways, private streets with storm and surface facilities in place meeting City standards, and other public or private owned properties or portions thereof having their own NPDES permitted storm and surface water runoff facilities which do not discharge to City facilities shall be exempt from the monthly charges set forth in this Section. -4- 13.63.100 Private stormwater retention system rate reduction. For any property other than a single-family residence or duplex residential dwelling, if the property owner (1) has been required by the City since January 15, 1993 to install a private stormwater retention system as a condition of the property's development or (2) has installed voluntarily since January 15, 1993 a private stormwater retention system serving the property and meeting City standards at the time of installation, the City may at its sole discretion reduce monthly stormwater charges for the property pursuant to PAMC 13.63.090D by up to 25 percent for systems meeting or exceeding the minimum requirements of the 1992 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington and up to 50 percent for systems meeting or exceeding the minimum requirements of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The rate reduction authorized by this Section shall not be used in coniunction with any other rate reduction authorized in Title 13 PAMC. 13.63.110 Application for rate reductions - Appeal. A_:. In order to qualify for exemptions or rate reductions set forth in PAMC 13.63.100 and 13.63.110, the property owner must file an application with the Director of Public Works and Utilities by November 15th of the year prior to the year in which the rate reduction is to be effective, except that for the year 2003 the property owner shall have until March 31, 2003 to file the application. B~. Any person aggrieved by any decision of the Director of Public Works and Utilities relating to an application for exemption or rate reductions authorized by PAMC 13.63.100 and 13.63.110 may appeal the Director's decision to the City Manager within 30 days of the date of the Director's decision. The City Manager's decision may be appealed to the City Council within 30 days of the date of the City Manager's decision. 13.63.120 Billing and payment. The City shall bill stormwater utility service accounts monthly and shall bill to property owners in the same manner as water and sewer. The amount to be billed shall be included on the existing utilities bill as a separate line item. A "stormwater only" billing will be sent to those property owners who are not current City utilities customers. Utility rates and charges specified in this Chapter shall be the responsibility of the owner in fee of any property chargeable for such service. Such charges shall be billed to the owner in fee of the property served last made known to the City and to the last known address. It shall be the duty of every property owner within the City to notify the office of the Finance Director of the fact of ownership and the address to which billing should be made. Any purchaser of property within the City shall notify the office of the Finance Director of the date of purchase and the proper billing address immediately upon acquisition of such interest; provided, however, that any owner in fee may designate another party to receive billing statements (such as a tenant), if such owner shall do so in writing together with a waiver of notice of such bills or any liens for delinquent accounts. This shall not relieve the owner from final liability for utility charges. Owners of multiple contiguous parcels within the City may applyto the Director o£Public Works and Utilities for consideration of consolidating the billing for such parcels. 13.63.130 Remedies. &. Termination of water service. The Director of Public Works and Utilities or designee is authorized to terminate water service to any property owner, unless said water service is received by a residential tenant, who fails to pay the stormwater utility service fees imposed by this Chapter in the same manner as delinquent water bills. Termination of such water service shall not limit other remedies available to the City. B..~. Lien for delinquent charges - Interest. Pursuant to RCW 35.67.200 et seq. the City shall have a lien for delinquent and unpaid stormwater charges. A stormwater lien shall be effective for a total not to exceed one year's delinquent service charges without the necessity of any writing or recording of the lien with the County Auditor. Enforcement and foreclosure of any stormwater lien shall be in the manner provided by state law. Interest on the unpaid balance shall be eight percent per annum or such rate as may hereafter be authorized by law. C~. Other remedies. The City shall have all other legally available remedies for enforcing and collecting delinquent and unpaid stormwater charges. 13.63.140 Inspections - Right of entry - Emergency. The City is authorized to enter at all reasonable times in or upon any property, public or private, for the purpose of operating or maintaining the storm and surface water facilities, or to inspect or investigate any condition relating to the stormwater utility; provided, that the City shall first obtain permission to enter from the owner or person responsible for such premises. If entry is refused, the Cig, shall have recourse to every remedy provided by law to secure entry. Notwithstanding the foregoing, whenever it appears to the City that conditions exist requiring immediate action to protect the public health or safety, the City is authorized to enter at all reasonable times in or upon any property, public or private, for the purpose of inspecting, investigating or correcting such emergency condition. Section 2 - Severability. If any provisions of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, or application of the provisions of the Ordinance to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected. Section 3 - Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect five days following the date of its publication by summary. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the _ day of September, 2002. MAYOR -6- ATTEST: Becky J. Upton, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Craig D. Knutson, City Attorney PUBLISHED: By Summary -7- pORTANGEL, ES W A S H I N G T O N1 U.S.A. CITY COUNCIL MEMO DATE: September 3, 2002 To: MAYOR WIGGINS AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Glenn A. Cutler, Director of Public Works and Utilities SUILIECT: Stormwater Utility, Public Hearing Summary: One of our major goals, as directed by City Council, is the implementation ora Stormwater Utility. A public outreach effort was conducted between April and July 2002 and comments solicited. Staff has completed development of an ordinance for formation of a stormwater utility to fund improvements. UAC has reviewed the ordinance and recommended forwarding to Council for a public hearing and adoption. Recommendation: Listen to the presentation, open the .public hearing and receive input regarding formation of the stormwater utility and continue the public hearing to the September 17, 2002 Council meeting. Background/Analysis: At the June 5, 2001 City Council approved proceeding with the development of a stormwater utility for implementation early in 2002. The utility is needed to correct longstanding flooding, erosion, and related stormwater problems, assist in required reduction of combined sewer overflow (CSO) per our Wastewater Treatment Plant's (WWTP) National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge permit, and to fund mandated stormwater management requirements of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Clean Water Act-NPDES Phase II potential Stormwater programs. The ESA requirements became effective January 1, 2001 and they prohibit any activity which harms endangered species. This applies to all City activities including, but not limited to construction projects, operation and maintenance activities, water intakes, erosion control practices, and all construction and new development activities permitted by the City. The stormwater management activities required by NDPES Phase II include public education and outreach, public involvement and participation, illicit discharge detection and elimination, construction and post-construction site stormwater runoff control, and pollution prevention for municipal operations. The Washington Department of Ecology (DOE), which administers and enforces the NPDES Phase II requirements, has developed a Storrnwater Management Manual for Western Washington which, when adopted by agencies, will meet these requirements. The City's current cleating, grading, filling and drainage ordinances do not fully meet the requirements of ESA and NPDES Phase II and will have to be modified to comply. The ESA requirements became effective January 2001 and the current anticipated date for compliance with NPDES Phase II is March 10, 2003. Port Angeles is listed in the NPDES Phase II regulations as a City which potentially may be included pending further study by DOE. At this The ESA requirements became effective January 2001 and the current anticipated date for compliance with NPDES Phase I3[ is March 10, 2003. Port Angeles is listed in the NPDES Phase II regulations as a City which potentially may be included pending further study by DOE. At this time the DOE has not determined if Port Angeles and the surrounding urban growth area CLIGA) will be covered by an NPDES Phase II permit. At a recent Clallam County Planning Commission meeting focusing on stormwater a DOE representative stated that those portions of Port Angeles covered by the WWTP's NPDES discharge permit may not be included and that it has not been determined as to whether the rest of the City and the UGA area will be included. The DOE representative further stated that a schedule for the decisions is due in September 2002 and that a decision as to our City's status and area of coverage is due in December 2002. A series of public meetings was held commencing in April 2002 to disseminate information concerning the need for a new stormwater utility, recent regulations, benefits, cost implications, highlights of the proposed ordinance and obtain feedback to help shape a recommendation to the UAC and City Council. Meetings were announced in the media (Peninsula Daily News ~ paid advertisements and articles, KONP - public service announcements and Peninsula Network News - cable TV outlet and Channel 21). A direct mailing campaign was also employed to announce the meetings to business, organizations and property owners. Presentations were given to the Chamber of Commerce, the Port Angeles Business Association, business owners, and residential owners. The public meetings for the business and residential owner were held during the day, as well as the evening, to facilitate attendance. The presentations were also available on the City website for individuals to review. Presentations were also given to the local Realtors at one of their luncheons, Kiwanis, Thursday AM group, and the North Olympic Building Association Board of Directors. Major issues raised by the Public included: 1. Economic impact of additional costs 2. Should the revenue collected be designated a fee or tax 3. Exemption of City facilities 4. Billings to tenants or property owners 5. Timing to adopt the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington 6. Equity between homes and businesses/commercial property 7. Why create a stormwater utility The formation ofa stormwater program and utility was discussed at the UAC on May 14 and 30, July 23 and August 13, 2002. During these meetings the reasons for formation of the Utility were revisited, the consequences of not forming the Utility, rate structures/revenues, impacts to residents and businesses, and exemptions/credits were some of the items discussed along with a thorough discussion on the ordinance. The proposed storm and surface water utility ordinance is intended to be straight forward and simple for ease of implementation, understanding and administration. The ordinance has been modified to reflect concerns and comments received during the public meetings and during discussion at the UAC meetings. Highlights of the attached proposed ordinance: 1. Effective collection fee date: January 1, 2003 2. Inclusion of all City properties for fee payments. Original proposal exempted all City property. 3. Establish $3.00 per month basic rate for developed single-family and duplex properties and set a cap of $30.00 per month for developed non-residential properties. Original proposal was for $6 to $8 per month with no cap. 4. Establish 4,000 square feet of impervious surface as the basic non-residential fee unit. Original proposal was for 2,500 square feet. Fractions of a unit will be rounded down with one unit being the minimum charge. 6. City Streets, State Highways, and other private streets and public or private properties having their own NPDES permits and do not discharge to City facilities shall be exempt from monthly fees. No change. 7. Nonresidential properties may receive fee reductions of up to 50% for installation of stormwater control measures. No change. 8. Adoption of the DOE Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington will be tied to the earlier of the NPDES Phase II permit date or the effective date of the Clallam County Salmon Recovery Plan for compliance with ESA. Original proposal was to adopt the manual at the effective date of the ordinance. 9. Billings to property owners unless assigned to tenants with approved arrangements. 10. Appeals process for reducing fee assessment. 11. Enforcement provisions including recorded liens if fees not paid. 12. Fee assessment to take into consideration that contiguous parcels/lots may make up one site for assessment. Therefore, minimizing the possibility of exceeding the intent of not charging more that $30 per month for an establishment. It is proposed that a $3.00 per month rate with a $30.00 cap be established. This will not generate sufficient revenue to fully fund intended functions associated with storm and surface water maintenance and improvements. The proposed fee along with existing funding will provide for a program that will be approximately at the 65 to 70% desired level. See attached proposed budget, program activity and revenue projections. It is considered a good starting point to commence efforts for addressing the stormwater issues facing the City. Much work needs to be accomplished and it is necessary to take a measured approach. It is planned to review the program for function and funding during its third year of operation as has been the practice with the other utilities. It is proposed to add a stormwater manager position in the engineering division to work for the City Engineer who will be tasked with implementation and administration of the new requirements and developing an overall strategy, and one utility worker in the Street Division to support maintenance requirements. The Street Division will be able to increase maintenance schedules for catch basin and ditch cleaning to bring us closer to compliance with ESA requirements. In addition the utility will fund a limited capital improvement program to construct needed improvements to protect property and the environment. Some examples of areas needing storm drainage improvements include discharge points over the marine bluffs, discharge points to streams, Lincoln Park/Big Boy Pond, "C" street extension area, Rose/Thistle/Canyon Edge area, and the Porter/Grant area. If approved the monthly billing for the utility fees will commence January 1, 2003 to coincide with startup of the new HTE system. A stormwater manager position would be filled on or about January 1, 2003 and tasked in part to revise the Urban Services Standards and Guidelines to reflect more user friendly development standards and reasonable cost effective measures to protect our unique environment. In addition the stormwater manager will be involved in public education and outreach, public involvement and participation, illicit discharge detection and elimination, construction and post-construction site stormwater rtmoff control, and pollution prevention for municipal operations. These activities and the revisions of our stormwater guidelines including clearing and grading are necessary to meet current ESA requirements and pending NPDES Phase 11 requirements. The filling of one additional utility worker to assist with the increased stormwater maintenance activities will also be filled in early 2003. The UAC has reviewed the attached ordinance and recommended forwarding to Council for a public hearing and adoption. A presentation will be given on the topic prior opening of the public hearing. N:~PROJECTSX21-12STRM$\9-03aCC_A.wpd PROPOSED STORMWATER UTILITY BUDaET &~/t, ~,., r / t,t~ ~ .,- 'T~ Jul'~, 29, 2002 Funding Sonrces ACTIVITY STREET SOLID WASTE STORM PROPOSED FUND WASTE WATER UTILITY STORM UTILITY UTILITY BUDGET O&M STREET SWEEPING $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $120,000 CATCH BASIN REPAIRS & $45,000 $0 $0 $45,000 $90,000 CLEANING (50% to 75%) DITCH/CULVERT CLEANING $45,000 $0 $0 $30,000 $75,000 (33% to 67% ) CULVERT INSTALLATION & $40,000 $0 $0 $10,000 $50,000 UNSCHEDULED WORK O & M SUBTOTAL $130,000 $120,000 $0 $85,000 ! $335,000 ADMIN., ENGINEERING, & $20,000 $0 $20,000 $95,000 $135,000 PLANNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $0 $0 $60,000 $85,000 $145,000 TOTAL STORMWATER PROGRAM $150,000 $120,000 $80,000 $265,000 $615,000 Notes: The Proposed Stormwater program assumes the following: O&M 1. Continuing street sweeping, culvert replacements, and emergency repairs at our current level. 2. Increasing catch basin cleaning and repairs from 50%/Year to 75%/Year. 3. Increasing ditch and culvert cleaning t~om 33%/Year to 67%/Year 4. Increasing 2 & 3 above catch basin and ditch/culvert maintenance includes 1 FTE Utility Worker 11. To further increase 2 & 3 to 100% will require and additional 1 FTE Utility Worker ($55,000) 5. Train crews in methods of water quality protection. 6. Repair/Replacement of eductor truck Admin., Engineering & Planning 1. Develop and implement a public education, outreach, participation and involvement. 2. Update Urban Services Standards and Guidelines sections for stormwater and cleating and grading to include appropriate practices and procedures toward meeting requirements of ESA and NPDES II that are applicable to our area. 3. Provide engineering planning, design, and construction management for capital improvement projects. 4. Update stormwater management plan and develop small works and CFP projects for prioritization and funding. 5. Pursue grant and low interest loan assistance. 6. Monitor water quality. 7. Review development permitting and design. 8. The above engineering activities includes 1 FTE Engineer/Manager position. 9. Planning support (0.5 FTE Assoc.Plarmer, $40,000) is not included N:~PROJECTSX21-12STRM SXproposed budget.wpd 9, 2oo CURRENT PROGRAM PROPOSED PROGRAM FULL PROGRAM ACTIVITIES COST ACTIVITY COST ACTIVITY COST ACTIVITY LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL [ EET SWEEPING $120,000 100% $120,000 100% $120,000 100% ~CH BASE~/LEPAIRS $45,000 $0% $90,000 75% $120,000 100% LEANING ~H/CULVERT $45,000 33% $75,000 67% $110,000 100% Ab/lNG ,VERT $40,000 100% $50,000 100% $50,000 100% FALLATION & ~CHEDULED WORK SUBTOTAL $250,000 63% : $335,000 84% $400,000 100% q., ENGINEERI31G, $40,000 27% $135,000 90% $150,000 100% NNING AL $60,000* 20% $145,000' 48% $300,000* 100% )VEMENTS ~ STORMWATER $350,000 41% $615,000 72% $850,000 100% LAM al Improvement funding shown for current program is for annual system improvements and docs not include : funded projects for Crown Park Overflow ($100k) and Lincoln Street Storm Linc ($100k). The Capital ements required to meet future NPDES II, ESA, and CSO are unknown, but will be at negotiated value and It. ~,C TS~21 - 12 STRM $\pr oposedpgnn.wpd STORMWATER UTILITY FEE AND REVENUE INITIAL PROJECTIONS Updated July 30, 2002 $3.00/ESU; 4,000 SF PER NON-RESIDENTIAL ESU; CAPPED ,f 10 ESUs Property Descriptions Total Capped Monthly Annual Net Annual ESUs ESUs Fees Fees Revenues* Residential, business & Misc 7,339 7,335 $22,005 $264,060 $242,935 City of Port Angeles 545 234 $702 $8,424 $7,750 Clallam County 79 71 $213 $2,556 $2,352 Washington State 198 41 $123 $1,476 $1,358 Federal Government 191 41 $123 $1,476 $1,358 Port Angeles School District 291 63 $189 $2,268 $2,087 Port of Port Angeles 1,591'* 17 $51 $612 $563 Clallam Transit 41 10 $30 $360 $331 Hospital & Care Facilities 83 30 $90 $1,080 $994 Library 19 10 $30 $360 $331 Clallam Co. Hist. Soc. 5 5 $15 $180 $166 Places of Worship 170 122 $366 $4,392 $4,041 Totals 10,552 7,979 $23,937 $287,244 $264,264 * Revenues shown reflect deduction for 8% utility tax ** Majority of Port property is at north airport industrial park. Note: Businesses, at this time, are spread throughout this breakdown depending on the properties where they are located (ie Residential, Port, Federal, Hospital & Care) Each additional $1 of fee will generates approximately $88,000 of net revenue. N:~PROJECTS~21 - 12STRM $~rcv~nu¢ table4.wpd 4.6 Facilities, Solutions, and Costs of Drainage Control 4.6.1 Overview The above engineering evaluation of the City's drainage system has identified a number of different flooding problems. Where needed, structural solutions and' costs have been proposed. The various capital projects have been prioritized and scheduled for construction over a 10-year period of time. Total capital costs have been estimated to be $9,325,000. It is important to realize that these structural flood controls are needed in addition to the source and treatment controls presented in Section 3. A five year capital improvement program totaling $4,325,000 has been proposed to resolve the City's highest priority drainage problems. 4.6.2 Summary of Flooding Problems and Proposed Solutions ' The preceding engineering analysis identified over 29 existing drainage and localized flooding problems, as shown earlier in Exhibit 4-5 and described in Section 4.4.3. Presented in Table 4-4 are the twenty five capital improvement projects that have been recommended to address the City's drainage problems. The cost of the recommended stormwater capital improvement program (CIP) program is $9,325,000. The following capital facilities are recommended to alleviate the drainage Problems identified in the engineering analysis and observed by City staff. The general location of the proposed capital projects is presented in Exhibit 4-7. A ten year construction schedule has been identified in Table 4-5 that sets the capital priorities and direction for the City's new stormwater management program. 'A five year CIP program totaling $4,325,000 has been identified that presents solutions to the City's highest priority drainage Existing Drainage System and Engineering Analysis -- / ~ ~ ~ ~. 4-39 Table 4-4 List of Flooding Problems and Proposed Capital Solutions and Costs Within the City of Port Angeles Drainage Project Project Name/Location l~nagement Number and Description Area Priority Cost CIP-1 Creek Outlet Dredging: Peabody, Valley and 5, 6, & 7 H/gh $150,000 Tumwater Creeks CIP-2 Peabody Creek/Lincoln Street Culvert 7 High $350,000 Rehabilitation CIP-3 Francis Street Storm Sewer and Sewer Separation 7 Low $500,000 and Outfall Improvements (#009-1) Stormwater Discharges Over Bluff':. CIP-4 · At 4th Street and N Street 2 High $100,000 CIP-5 · At End of 10th Strest 2 $100,000 CIP-6 · At End of P Street 2 $100,000 CIP-7 · At End of McDonald Street i $100,000 CIP-8 10th Street and N Street Regional Detention 2 High $250,000 Facili .ty (#018-16) CIP-9 Cronauer Property Acquisition (Part of CSO 7 Medium $400,000 Detention Facility on Eastside of Francis Street) CIP-10 Ctty-wide Catch Basin Modifications City-wide Low $1~250~000 CIP-11 Milwaukee Drive Stormwater Improvement 1 Low $1.000~000 CIP-12 City-wide GIS System/City Imaging System City-wide Medium $375~000 CIP-13 CSO SWrm Projects City-wide Medium $1~000,000 CIP-14 10th Street/llth Street Alley (stormwatar 7 Medium $100,000 intercepter from L Street to Seabreeze Place) (wetland issue?) CIP-15 Lincoln Park Stormwater Interceptor 3 High . $250~000 CIP-16 City-wide End of Street Discharges into Urban City-wide Low $1,250,000 Drainage Problem Area Preliminary High Engineering Studie~Projects CIP#17- CIP #22: CIP-17 · Milwaukee/Butler/P Street Area 1 $50,000 CIP-18 · Rhodes/Schrivner, Rose/Thistle Area 7 $50,000 CIP-19 · Penn Park Area 5 $25,000 CIP-20 · Porter/McDougal Area 7 $50,000 CIP-21 · Upper Golf Course Road Area 8 $50,000 CIP-22 · 10th Street/M Street Area 2 $50~000 CLP-23 Storm Sewer to Separate Sanitary Flows in Lincoln 7 Medium $500,000 Street (from 7th Street to First Street (#006-2/007- (wetland 1) issue?) CIP-24 Small Works Projects, Illclndln~. City-wide Medium $25,000 pe~ · 5th SWeet and Liberty Street~$9,300 year · Inlets and Drains at Alder and 4th Street-- ($250,000 $27,100 over 10 years) CIP-25 Projects from Preliminary Engineering Studies of City-wide Medium $100,000 Drainage Problem Areas (CIP #17-CIP#22) Total Cost of Stormwater $9,325,000 Capital Facilities Existing Drainage System and Engineering Analysis 4-40 Existing Drainage System and Engineering Analysis 4-42 problems. The average annual CIP funding level is about $800,000-$900,000 per year. This is a level of funding that the City may be able to sustain over an extended period of time from both an internal management and debt financing perspective. 4.6.3 Recommended Drainage Facilities and Costs The conclusion of tl~s engineering analysis is that the City needs to implement a series of capital sto~'m drainage improvements over a multi-year planning period to meet the drainage needs of the City. The priority and costs of the recommended stormwater improvements have been presented above in Table 4-4. Generally, the projects listed in the 5-year CIP plan are the highest priority and should be constructed first. It is important to realize that although initially expensive, the proposed stormwater CIP program is an integral part of the City's overall CSO reduction and wastewater facility improvement program Effectively, managing the City's stormwater, including the separation of stormwater from the City's extensive combined sewer collection system, is financially much more cost-effective than attempting to build additional conveyance and treatment capacity within the City's present wastewater system. This approach attempts to take into account the various infrastructure needs and financial priorities of the City by extending the stormwater capital needs of the City over a 10-year implementation schedule. Existing Drainage System and Engineering Analysis 4-43