HomeMy WebLinkAbout000251 Amendment (2)II TIME OF PERFORMANCE
TASK ORDER 1
FOR TASKS 3, 4, and 5
TO THE
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN THE
THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
AND
BROWN AND CALDWELL, INC.
OCA 2011 -02
RELATING TO: ON -CALL WASTEWATER UTILITY ENGINEERING SERVICES
This Task Order No. 1 for Tasks 3, 4, 5 is made and entered into this 10
day of �-&lpvu4ivy 2012, by and between THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES, a non charter code
city of the Sta Washington, (hereinafter called the "CITY and Brown and Caldwell, Inc.,
a California Corporation authorized to do business in the State of Washington (hereinafter
called the "CONSULTANT
The Task Order is being entered into under the Agreement for On -Call Wastewater Utility
Engineering Services, OCA 2011 -02 that was entered into on December 7, 2011.
I TASK ORDER SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of professional services to be performed and the results to be achieved by the
CONSULTANT for tasks 3, 4, and 5 are identified in attached Exhibit TO1 -A2. The
CONSULTANT shall provide and furnish all services and material necessary to accomplish the
Tasks 3, 4, and 5 identified in Exhibit TO1 -A2.
The work for all Tasks shall be completed by September 30, 2012. The schedule of
performance for Tasks 3, 4, and 5 is identified in Exhibit TO1 -B2.
III MAXIMUM COMPENSATION
OCA 2011 -02, Task Order 1
000a5
The maximum total compensation and reimbursement payable to the CONSULTANT for Tasks
3, 4, and 5 is stated in the attached Exhibit TO1 -C2. The budget for any Task(s) may be further
adjusted by mutual agreement as long as the maximum compensation amount of $275,000 is
not exceeded.
Page T01-1 2/6/2012
IV EXHIBITS
This Task Order, including its exhibits, constitutes the entire Task Order, supersedes all prior
written or oral understandings, and may only be changed by a written agreement by both
parties. The following exhibits are hereby made a part of this Task Order:
Exhibit TO1 -A2 Scope of Services of Tasks
Exhibit TO1 -B2 Schedule of Performance of Tasks
Exhibit TO1 -C2 Budget of Tasks
V SIGNING
In WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Task Order to the Agreement
as of the day and year first written above.
CONSULTANT:
TITLE:
OCA 2011 -02, Task Order 1
CITY OF PORT ANGELES:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
/�2
CITY ATTORNEY 1
C7C/Va)
CITt5 ERK
Page TO 1 -2 2/6/2012
Task 3 Septage Receiving Facility Design
EXHIBIT TO1 -A2
SCOPE OF SERVICES for
Task Order 1
TASKS 3, 4, 5 and 6
In June, 2010 BC conducted a workshop with the City to review and discuss a number of City proposed
capital facility projects, most of which related to improvements at the City's wastewater treatment
plant. The planned improvement projects to be considered include:
Septage Receiving Station, Project WW02 -2008
Digester Mixing Improvement, Project WW05 -2008
Plant De- Watering Improvements, Project WW02 -2005
Carbon Scrubbers, Project WW04 -2008
Plant Programmable Logic Controller /HMI Replacement, Project WW02 -2010
Dry Polymer Feeder Replacement, Project WW01 -2008
Waste Activated Sludge thickening, Project WW06 -2008
Turbo Blower Installation, Project WW01 -2010
Pumpstation #3 Flow Impediments and Pump Evaluation
The workshop concluded the improvements were feasible although the full costs were not yet
identified, that coordination with the CSO program was required and that final definition of the
proposed projects was dependent on final sizing to suit flow and loading projections and policy
decisions around sludge, disposal. The work for these tasks will be built upon these previous
discussions with the City by incorporating the various City identified projects into the tasks and
subtasks described below.
This task includes design development, plans, and technical specifications required for construction of
the proposed septage receiving facility.
During the Phase 1 CSO Improvements an arrangement for the septage receiving station was laid out
"near the Influent Diversion Structure (IDS). A soil boring was placed near this area to support final
design. The design development will proceed for the general location shown in Figure 3, Brown
Caldwell Technical Memorandum CSO Phase 1 Improvements: Septage Receiving Station, dated April
2010.
The Phase 1 preliminary design developed a system based on two precast manhole -type tanks for
receiving septage, and separating heavy solids and floatables. The second tank will also function as a
wetwell for a submersible pump for discharging the septage to the headworks (with allowance in the
piping for possible future diversion to the plant digesters. The pumps will be sized for passage of
solids but controlled to produce a limited, hourly average flow to the headworks to avoid shock loading
the plant. The pumps will be controlled from water level measurements. A ventilation system
(including fan and carbon canister) will operate when septage is being discharged to the tanks (as
OCA•2011 -02, Task Order 1
Page TO1 -A2 -1 2/6/2012
known from water level measurement). The system will be activated by way of card reader or key pad
at the facility. Auxiliary services will include a chlorine solution and washwater supply line extended
from the plant. Electrical and Control systems and panels will be located within or at the Electrical
Building provided near the Influent Diversion Structure as part of the Phase 1 Improvements project.
Access to the new facility for septage haulers will be on the existing gravel road at the south margin of
the wastewater treatment plant. Limited restoration design for the gravel road to the extent of a
uniform graded 4" thick crushed surfacing top course is part of this scope. The Facility site begins at
the end of the road and site design includes fencing, access control and roadway design inside the
Facility.
The following subtasks are for development and preparation of design drawings and specifications for
the septage receiving facility:
Subtask 3.1. Sizing, Siting and Civil Design
Scope of Evaluation: Tentative sizing and siting were done during the Phase 1 Improvements
design using septage data gathered by City plant operators during 2009. Data from subsequent years
and months will be reviewed and evaluated to determine whether adjustments should be made to the
initial sizing. The siting will be updated to conform to City input on truck traffic flow and the entire
arrangement fit into the geographic context of grading and drainage considerations. New roadway
design is not included in this task.
Activities:
1. Review Treatment Plant Monitoring Reports to update data on delivery of septage quantities
and quality
a. Develop projections of future septage volumes and loadings
b. Re- calculate facility volume and pumping rate sizing.
2. Develop- facility arrangement and siting near IDS to accommodate required tank sizing, traffic
flow and utility (pump discharge, electrical and I &C) line alignments
a. Coordinate with Phase 1 Improvements
3. Development grade requirements and facility elevations
a. Develop drainage plan
4. Develop surfacing requirements including truck unloading slab on grade
5. Identify new fencing requirements and coordination with Phase 1 site work.
a. Include location for motorized access gate
6. Prepare summary memorandum describing design concepts
a. Incorporate mechanical, electrical and I &C aspects of design
7. Prepare drawings and specifications for contracting
8. Prepare estimate of probable construction cost
City Responsibilities:
1. Provide copies of monthly Plant Monitoring Reports from January, 2010 to the present.
2. Identify City direction(s) from which truck traffic will flow into the facility and location of a
motorized access gate.
3. Review and approve design concepts (this becomes authorization to proceed with final design)
4. Prepare SEPA checklist (if required)
OCA 2011 -02, Task Order 1
Page TO 1 -A2 -2 2/6/2012
5. Submit project documentation (if required) to Ecology
Deliverables:
1. Design Summary Memorandum (site and section figures and description)
2. Draft Plans and Technical Specifications (90% complete)
3. Final Plans and technical Specifications (100 Project Cost Estimate
Subtask 3.2. Mechanical Design
Scope of Evaluation: This work will include sizing and selection of mechanical components and
systems and identify operating concepts.
Activities:
1. Identify pumping equipment and sizing consistent with septage delivery volumes and plant
loading considerations.
a. Develop pumping system including discharge piping and location of discharge at IDS.
b. Determine motor size and power requirements
c. Identify operating concepts
2. Identify and size ventilation and odor control components
a. Develop system concept and operating requirements
b. Determine motor size and power requirements
3. Prepare mechanical drawings and specifications
Subtask 3.3. Structural Design
Scope of Work: Structural support will be required to evaluate surface loadings and foundation
conditions. Unloading slab design will be similar to Phase 1 design approach for slabs on grade.
Subtask 3.4. Electrical Design
Scope of Work: Provide power supply to motorized elements of design.
Activities:
1. Identify power supply location and system requirements to energize motorized elements of
design.
2. Identify UPS power requirements and coordinate with UPS design under the control system
upgrade design.
3. Provide system summaries for inclusion in Design Summary Memorandum
4. Prepare electrical drawings and division 16 specifications.
City Responsibilities:
1. Provide review and feed back of all preliminary deliverables.
Assumptions:
1. Site visits, client review meetings and UPS power requirements design will be covered in control
system upgrade scope for the Septage Receiving If not, hours must be added to account for
these items in this task.
OCA 2011 -02, Task Order 1
Page TO1 -A2 -3 2/6/2012
Subtask 3.5. Instrumentation Control (I &C) Design
Scope of Work: Facility will be automated to permit preauthorized entry via card reader (or manual
push button should a card reader interface not be available), measurement and recording of septage
volumes received, and operation of mechanical systems.
Activities:
1. Identify control requirements and coordinate with plant and /or local control systems.
2. Identify instrumentation, PLC and network communication requirements.
3. Provide system summaries for inclusion in Design Summary Memorandum
4. Prepare I &C drawings and division 17 specifications.
City Responsibilities:
1. Provide review and feedback of all preliminary deliverables.
Assumptions:
1. Site visits, client review meetings, UPS power design and control system architecture for the
Septage Receiving site are included in control system upgrade scope of work.
2. One control strategy is required for manual and automatic operation of the septage receiving
system initiated from either a card reader or pushbutton (should there be no PLC interface to
the card reader). Control to start/stop lead -lag transfer pumps, and septage tank fan when
receiving septage. Automatic control of transfer pumps based on septage tank levels and
limitation of average hourly flow rate.
3. No bidding services or services during construction have been included in this scope of work.
Subtask 3.99. Project Management
Objective: Provide overall project team leadership and guidance to align the project tasks with City
objectives and provide project deliverables within budget and time constraints. To coordinate, monitor,
and control the project resources to meet the technical, communication, and contractual obligations
required for developing and preparing the planning documents.
Activities:
1. Management teleconferences as necessary to track issues, progress and budget
2. Submit monthly invoices with progress reports
3. Maintain task schedule and update as necessary
4. Maintain project documents relevant to task performance, conclusions and decisions
5. Provide for coordination and availability of BC resources committed to task performance
City Responsibilities:
1. Maintain record of milestones and decisions completed
Deliverables:
1. Meeting agenda and summaries of key meeting issues and action items
2. Monthly status reports that include any scope, schedule or budget issues anticipated or arising
3. Monthly invoices
4. Project documents constituting the basis of the work and decisions
OCA 2011 -02, Task Order 1
Page TO 1 -A2 -4 2/6/2012
Task 4 CSO Reduction Plan Assessment Report (and Amendment)
This scope of work provides for general assistance to the wastewater utility and specifically includes
preparation of a CSO Reduction Plan Report (and Amendment, if necessary) consistent with
requirements of the Department of Ecology.
This task consists of preparation of a report required under the Wastewater Utility's NPDES permit and
that complies with the requirements of WAC 173 245 090(2). The report provides review and
documentation of past activities and progress toward implementing an approved CSO Plan. The report
also must be forward looking to either revising the Plan (the report would include amendments) or
presenting a current schedule for meeting compliance. Since it appears the City can still meet the
existing compliance schedule, it is assumed that amendments will not be required and have not been
included in this scope and budget.
The following subtasks are required to produce the assessment report:
Subtask 4.1. CSO Plan Effectiveness
This task will compile information on I/I reduction projects completed by the City over the past 5 years
and evaluate their contribution to the overall flow reduction.
Activities:
1. Identify flow reduction projects.
2. Summarize results for reporting purposes.
City Responsibilities:
1. Provide information on City I/I reduction efforts beyond the First Street Separation project.
2. Provide Annual CSO Reports for the past 8 to 10 years.
Subtask 4.2. Evaluate CSO Project Priority
This task will evaluate the current sequence and schedule of CSO projects.
Activities:
1. Review the 2006 Plan and subsequent amendments to identify scheduling and justifications for
prioritizing projects.
2. Summarize the current sequence and scheduling of projects and basis for any change from the
2006 Plan for reporting purposes.
City Responsibilities: None
OCA 2011 -02, Task Order 1
Page TO 1 -A2 -5 2/6/2012
Subtask 4.3. Update CSO Program Schedule
This task will update the CSO Program schedule based on progress to date and planned future
activities.
Activities:
1. Review current schedule and progress to date.
2. Update CSO Program schedule to show current project sequencing and timing
City Responsibilities: None
Subtask 4.4. Strategies for CSO Control Beyond 2015 Program
This task will establish future strategies for progressive reduction in the number and volume of
untreated CSO discharges and the reduction of primary-only treatment of peak combined flows. The
context for the strategies will be the emerging green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) approaches that
focus on enhancing the quality of stormwater as well as reduction in the rate and volume of
stormwater runoff, the City's new development codes, and the City's ongoing program of upgrading,
refurbishment and replacement for its wastewater and stormwater collection systems.
Activities:
1. Compile and review City service area data related to pollutant and storm water source
identification, existing combined, partially combined, sewer only, stormwater systems and land
forms including geologic conditions.
2. Establish the vision of stormwater and sewer system wet weather management and its linkage
to achieving reduction in storm influenced flows to the sanitary collection system and the
discharge of stormwater and CSO pollutants to Port Angeles Harbor and the Straits of Juan de
Fuca. BC will engage ESA to assist with this task.
3. Conduct informational workshop on the draft vision with City (stakeholders) to obtain local input
and establish community preferences.
4. Develop overview strategy and graphic demonstrating principal options over the service area.
5. Prepare summary memorandum for City review and comment.
City Responsibilities:
1. Provide service area and collection system data to become the foundation for the strategy.
2. Provide arrangements for workshop including invitation of participants
Subtask 4.5. Prepare CSO Plan Assessment Report
This task will update the CSO Program schedule based on progress to date and planned future
activities.
1. Compile from previous subtasks into report form similar to City's Annual CSO Reports
2. Submit draft report to City for review and comment
3. Finalize report
City Responsibilities:
1. Review and comment on draft plan.
OCA 2011 -02, Task Order 1
Page TO 1 -A2 -6 2/6/2012
2. Submit final plan to Department of Ecology
Deliverables:
1. Draft CSO Plan Assessment Report
2. Final CSO Plan Assessment Report
Subtask 4.99. Project Management
Objective: Provide overall project team leadership and guidance to align the project tasks with City
objectives and provide project deliverables within budget and time constraints. To coordinate, monitor,
and control the project resources to meet the technical, communication, and contractual obligations
required for developing and preparing the planning documents.
Activities:
1. Management teleconferences as necessary to track issues, progress and budget
2. Submit monthly invoices with progress reports
3. Maintain task schedule and update as necessary
4. Maintain project documents relevant to task performance, conclusions and decisions
5. Provide for coordination and availability of BC resources committed to task performance
City Responsibilities:
1. Maintain record of milestones and decisions completed
Deliverables:
1. Meeting agenda and summaries of key meeting issues and action items
2. Monthly status reports that include any scope, schedule or budget issues anticipated or arising
3. Monthly invoices
4. Project documents constituting the basis of the work and decisions
Task 5 Wastewater Conveyance System Model Update and Flow Projection Development
This scope of work provides for using current data to update the wastewater conveyance system model
that predicts CSO event frequency.
The existing hydrologic /hydraulic predictive model will be updated to accommodate performance data
the City has accumulated. The model output will then provide the basis for system and CSO Plan
evaluation, capital project development, and Plan revision as necessary.
The following subtasks are included as part of the model updating and flow analysis process:
Subtask 5.1. Data Collection
Objective: Assemble and review data from existing overflow monitors and PS #3 and PS #4 to extend
model time period and facilitate comparison to recent overflow data. Data requirements are as follows:
1. CSO monitors (ADS)
Time series of depth upstream of weir.
Time series of depth downstream of weir where applicable.
OCA 2011 -02, Task Order 1
Page TO l -A2 -7 2/6/2012
Time series of computed overflow rate.
2. Pump Stations
Drawings to confirm Wet Well dimensions and elevation.
Operating parameters: on -off levels.
Run time data (continuous time series) for period of ADS monitoring.
Continuous time series data for wet well depth.
Draw down tests to verify flow capacities.
3. Rainfall
Continuous data at minimum available time step from 2006 to present.
4. Treatment Plant Flow data
Continuous data at minimum available time step for period of ADS monitoring.
5. System Data
Inspection of gravity line between CSO #6 and PS #4 and the gravity line from the outlet of
the PS #3 forcemain and PS #4 for sediment, blockages, or crushed pipe.
Identification of location and time of occurrence for any known manhole overflows (other
than defined CSOs) in the system.
Location of any identified storm connections to the sewer system.
Deliverables:
Assembled and reviewed data necessary to extend hydraulic model runs.
City Responsibilities:
1. City to collect and transmit data to BC. City to conduct draw down tests at pump stations #3
and #4 to determine pumping capacities and inspect gravity lines listed above. (BC will provide
instruction to City on collection of data.)
Subtask 5.2. Extend predicted hydrology flow files
Objective: To extend the model hydrology flow time series with recent rainfall. Steps include the
following:
Activities:
1. Import new rain data to CAPE (Brown and Caldwell program for time series data manager and
I/I model development.
2. Calculate extended flow series at loading locations for the hydraulic model
3. Export flow series from CAPE, manipulate and import to Mouse model,
4. Export model geometry and flow series in a format compatible to the City's modeling software
(Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis), to enable City staff to run modeling scenarios.
Deliverables:
Extended hydrologic model time series to match extended rainfall series
OCA 2011 -02, Task Order 1
Page TO 1 -A2 -8 2/6/2012
City Responsibilities: None
Subtask 5.3. Revise and run hydraulic model to compare to recent overflow data
Objective: To run model with existing hydrological calculations to compare predictions with recent
overflow data.
Activities:
1. Import time series data from Task 5.1 to facilitate comparison
2. Revise model to reflect data obtained in Task 5.1
3. Run model for the period of ADS monitoring
4. Compare output of model to measured data: depth at overflows, overflow flow time series and
volumes, and flows at the wastewater treatment plant
5. Prepare Tech Memo describing the correspondence of the model to measurements. Include
recommendations for model adjustment if necessary.
Deliverables:
Technical memorandum describing correspondence of model to measurements, and
recommendations for future model adjustments as necessary.
City Responsibilities: None
Subtask 5.4. Develop requirements for replacement of pump station #3 and review sewer impact on
properties along Milwaukee Drive
Objective: To'develop requirements to replace PS #3 and to establish expected flow depths in sewer
upstream near the former location of CSO #1.
Data collected for the west end of town during the original metering project in 2000 -2001 was of poor
quality and could not be used to develop an accurate model calibration. As a result, the model was
developed using flow parameters developed from other areas in the City. The parameters applied are
believed to be conservative, producing sufficiently high flows to assess CSOs downstream. However,
the assumed flows are likely to cause the hydraulic grade line in the existing forcemain from PS #3 to
PS #4 to rise unrealistically producing an unrealistic assessment of the impact on sewer depths
upstream.
To overcome this gap in knowledge of the west end, it is recommended that a flow monitor be installed
in the reach upstream of the pipe over the bluff used to replace PS #1 to collect flow data from October
1, 2011 through January 2012. This data will be used to recalibrate the west end of the model prior to
development of the PS #3 replacement plan.
Activities:
1. Installation of a flow monitor at or near MH Asset ID 1217 near the intersection of Milwaukee
Drive and N Street to collect depth and velocity data and calculate flow. (This and nearby MHs
should be inspected to locate the best site for flow measurement. Data should be collected from
October 1, 2011, through a minimum of February 1, 2012. It is assumed the City will contract
OCA 2011 -02, Task Order 1
Page TO1 -A2 -9 2/6/2012
separately with ADS to provide this monitor or otherwise obtain this monitor. Revise model to
reflect data obtained in subtask 5.1)
2. Installation of a pressure sensor on the discharge side of PS #3 with a continuous recorder to
measure the pressure head. This will define the conditions under which PS #3 operates and will
be used to calibrate the model. (It is assumed the City will contract separately with ADS or
otherwise provide this monitor.)
3. Compare output of model to measured data: depth at overflows, overflow flow time series and
volumes, and flows at the wastewater treatment plant
4. Collection of data at PS #3 including continuous records of pump run time and wet well
elevation.
5. Recalibration of the existing model to the flow data collected above.
6. Run revised model for the available rainfall period (2000 2011) to provide statistics on:
a. Maximum hydraulic grade line elevation in the vicinity of MH 1217.
b. Refined design criteria for PS #3 replacement.
Deliverables:
1. Recalibrated model for west end of Port Angeles.
2. Technical memorandum defining expected hydraulic grade line elevations in the vicinity of MH
1217 and design criteria for replacement of PS #3.
City Responsibilities: As noted in activities above.
Subtask 5.5. Planning for recalibration of remainder of hydraulic /hydrologic models (contingent on
finding of Task 5.3)
Objective: This task provides for recalibration of the remainder of the model (other than the west
end covered in Task 4.4) in the event that the comparisons to recent overflow data (Task 4.3) indicate
a wide disparity between the model and observations. It is expected that the model is currently
conservative and that recalibration may reduce the required size of PS #4 or show enhanced CSO
control.
Activities:
1. Based on the results of Task 5.3, define the potential benefits of model recalibration, define
requirements and develop a scope and budget estimate.
2. To develop a contingency budget, the following re- calibration activities have been assumed:
a. Installation of up to four flow monitors for four months of data collection during the wet
season.
b. Recalibration of the model at the new flow meter locations
c. Adjustment of the model hydraulics to match observed overflow history at CSOs 8, 6, 7
and 10.
3. Prepare a technical memorandum describing the re- calibration results.
Deliverables:
1. Technical memorandum describing the benefits and a plan, scope and budget to accomplish the
recalibration.
2. Recalibrated model if required
3. Technical memorandum describing the recalibration
OCA 2011 -02, Task Order 1
Page TO 1 -A2 -10 2/6/2012
City Responsibilities: Provide additional flow monitoring data.
Subtask 5.6. Validation of CSO Control Plan
Objective: To use model (recalibrated as necessary in Task 5) to validate the current CSO Plan.
Activities:
1. Refine model configuration based on findings of previous tasks and predesign studies.
2. Run the revised model over the available rainfall record (2000 to 2012 or 2013).
3. From the model results, develop overflow history (frequency and volume), peak flow rates at
PS #4 and the Francis Street diversion, and wastewater treatment plant flow conditions.
Deliverables:
Technical memorandum documenting the validation runs and results, including any recommended
changes to existing facilities.
Subtask 5.99. Project Management
Objective: Provide overall project team leadership and guidance to align the project tasks with City
objectives and provide project deliverables within budget and time constraints. To coordinate, monitor,
and control the project resources to meet the technical, communication, and contractual obligations
required for developing and preparing the planning documents.
Activities:
1. Project Status Reports and Invoicing
2. Coordination with the City
3. Management and Coordination of Staff
4. Subcontracting and coordination of Subconsultants
5. QA /QC
Deliverables:
1. Meeting agenda and summaries of key meeting issues and action items
2. Monthly status reports that include any scope, schedule or budget issues anticipated or arising
3. Monthly invoices
4. Subcontracts
OCA 2011 -02, Task Order 1
END OF EXHIBIT
Page TO1 -A2 -11 2/6/2012
ID (Task Name
1 1CitY NTP
3 'Task 001 On Call Assignments
4 To be scheduled as assigned
5
6 (Task 002 WWTP Engrg Report
7 PS#3 Replacement Prelim Design
8 WWTP Improvements Plan Development
9 Establish Baseline
10 Evaluate Offsite Options
11 Evaluate Onsite Class A Options
12 Select Preferred
13 Develop Implementation Plan
14 Prepare Final Report
15 City Review
16 Final Report
17 Submit Report to Ecology
18 Flow Monitor Data Collection (City)
19
20 Task 006 System Model Update
21 CITY NTP (Council Approval 12/20)
22 Data Collection Review
23 Revise Hydrualic Model
24 Identify PS #3 Flow Reqts
25 Validate CSO Plan Projects
26 Prepare summary memorandum
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
0 days Wed 12/7/11 Wed 12/7/11
0 days Wed 12/7/11 Wed 12/7/11
182 days? Thu 12/8/11 Fri 8/17/12
1 50 days Mon 4/30/12 Fri 7/6/12
r. 182 days, Thu 12/8/11 Fri 8/17/12
25 days, Thu 12/8/11 Wed 1/11/12
35 days! Thu 1/12/12 Wed 2/29/12
50 days Thu 1/12/12 Wed 3/21/12
10 days, Thu 3/22/12 Wed 4/4/12
30 days Thu 4/5/12 Wed 5/16/12
35 days' Thu 5/17/12' Wed 7/4/12
15 days' Mon 7/9/12 Fri 7/27/12
15 days Mon 7/30/12 Fri 8/17/12
1 day Fn 8/17/12 Fri 8/17/12
40 days Thu 12/8/11 Wed 2/1/12
91 days
1 day,
15 days'
25 days
15 day&
20 days,
15 days
Fri 2/10/12
Fri 2/10/12
Mon 2/13/12
Mon 3/5/12
Mon 4/9/12
Mon 4/30/12
Mon 5/28/12
Fri 6/15/12
Fri 2/10/12
Fri 3/2/12
Fn 4/6/12
Fri 4/27/12
Fri 5/25/12
Fri 6/15/12
Task 003 Septage Receiving Contract Docs 116 days? Fri 2/10/12 Fri 7/20/12
CITY NTP (Council Approval 12/20) 1 day' Fri 2/10/12 Fri 2/10/12
Siting and Civil 40 days Mon 2/13/12 Fri 4/6/12
Mechanical 15 days' Mon 4/9/12 Fri 4/27/12
Structural 20 days: Mon 4/9/12 Fri 5/4/12
Electrical 20 days? Mon 4/30/12 Fri 5/25/12
I &C 25 days" Mon 4/30/12 Fri 6/1/12
City Review 15 days? Mon 6/4/12 Fri 6/22/12
Final Documents 20 days? Mon 6/25/12 Fri 7/20/12
Task 004 CSO Plan Update i 121 days Fri 2/10/12 Fri 7/27/12
CITY NTP (Council Approval 12/20) 1 1 day' Fri 2/10/12 Fri 2/10/12
Compile past 5 years data summarize 20 days Mon 2/13/12 Fri 3/9/12
Update program schedule priorities 10 days Mon 3/12/12 Fri 3/23/12
Identify future source control options preference 40 days" Mon 4/9/12 Fri 6/1/12
Prepare draft report 15 days? Mon 6/4/12 Fri 6/22/12
City Review 10 days? Mon 6/25/12 Fri 7/6/12
Finalize report 15 days? Mon 7/9/12 Fri 7/27/12
Project On Call Tasks 3, 4, and 5
FINAL Task3_Task4_Task5 mpp
Task
Split
Duration Start Finish 1 1Oct'11 INov'11 1Dec'11 1Jan'12 I Feb '12 I Mar '12 IAor'12 IMav'12 IJun'12 IJul'12 1Aua'12
11 1 18 125 1 2 19 1 16 123 1 30 1 6 1 13 120 127 1 4 1 11 1 18 125 1 1 1 8 1 15 122 129 1 5 1 12 1 19 126 1 4 1 11 1 18 125 1 1 1 8 11512212g 6 1 13 120 127 1 3 1 10 1 17 124 1 1 1 8 1 15 122 129 1 5 1 12 1
1 day Wed 12/7/111 Wed 12/7/11 G
Progress
Milestone 0
Summary
12/7
41012/7
Page TO1 -B2 -1
L
External Tasks f
Project Summary V rJ External Milestone .0
J
Deadline
Exhibit B2 Schedule Tasks 3,4,and 5