Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA State Auditorw >�g W A S H I N G T a N, U.S.A. July 15, 2014 Mr. Alexander Beherndt Assistant State Auditor Team Port Orchard WA State Auditor's Office 600 Kitsap Street, Suite 201 Port Orchard, WA 98366 RE: Management Letters Dear Mr. Beherndt: Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Audit Findings included as part of the 2013 Audit for the City of Port Angeles. We have prepared separate responses for the two Audit Findings as noted below: Suspension and Debarment Requirements: The City greatly appreciates the efforts of the State Auditor's Office regarding the auditing and review of federal grant funded projects. We concur with the Audit Finding and have already taken steps to prevent re- occurrence of the issue in the future. All construction contract awards will be processed through the City's Department of Public Works and Utilities. They have modified their procedures and checklist to include checking for suspension or disbarment regardless of the source of funding to pay for the construction contract. By requiring checking on all construction contract awards, we should be able to eliminate any confusion regarding whether or not the funding source required checking for suspension, or disbarment of the proposed contract recipient. For non - construction contracts, we will be instituting a training program for all other departments that will highlight the requirement to check for disbarment or suspension for all contract awards greater than $25,000, regardless of funding source. Departments will be required to submit to the Finance Department proof of the checking for suspension and disbarment as part of the contract approval process. The training should be complete by the end of August 2014. Letter to State Auditor Oitiee Response to Audit Findings July 15, 2014 Page -- 2 -- Financial Reporting: There are three components to this audit finding, and it is important to note that the City of Port Angeles self - disclosed the problems related to two of the three components. In addition, the City would also note that there was no impact to the Citywide financial statement bottom line for items #1 and #2. 1) $10 million Wastewater fund long -term debt misstatement. When researched online, the SAO site advises the auditee to ask onsite auditors if immediate assistance is needed and this was done. City staff requested information from auditors on site, and were told how it was represented was correct prior to submission. Unfortunately, the answer received was incomplete causing the misstatement. This item has been corrected. — Resolution: Staff will more fully investigate the amounts prior to submission and will double check with the GFOA and SAO when questions arise. In the future, staff will be more reluctant to ask onsite auditors if we need immediate assistance, despite the advice given on the SAO website. 2) Solid Waste Collection Utility understatement. This matter was brought forward by City staff and disclosed to the Auditor's office, it was not discovered by the State Auditor's Office personnel. This was also an overstatement in the Water fund by the same amount, caused by a typographical error when fund number 402 was entered into the journal account rather than fund number 404. Again, it is important to note that the Citywide bottom line was correct. In addition, net proprietary was correct. This item has been corrected. - Resolution: Staff will do a more thorough investigation and review of individual line amounts and double -check journal entries prior to entry. 3) GF liabilities understatement. This was an overstatement of liabilities in the Governmental Capital Improvement fund; however, Citywide information was correct on both the State of NA and Changes in Revenues, Expenditure. Cash was received and posted on 12/31/13 as pending by Customer Service into the General Fund, rather than the Capital fund. The amount was not discovered as being posted in the incorrect fund until after the reconciliation of the AR amounts, and presentation of the financial statements. A question was asked concerning liabilities in the General Fund. Upon further review and research, City staff disclosed to the Letter to State Auditor Office Response to Audit Findings July 15, 2014 Page -- 3 -- Auditor's Office that the amount should have been cleared and posted to the Capital Fund. This time has been corrected. - Resolution: Staff will do more thorough investigation of individual pending amounts to ensure they are recorded to the correct fund. The City does appreciate the efforts of the State Auditor's Office and looks forward to continuing a positive and fruitful relationship going forward for the benefit of the citizens of Port Angeles. If the Auditor's Office would like to have further discussion, or clarification, regarding the City's response, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Best regards, `! _.� F Byro: Olson Chief Financial Officer Cc: City Council Dan McKeen, City Manager William Bloor, City Attorney Nathan West, Director of Community & Economic Development Craig Fulton, Director of Public Works & Utilities Terry Gallagher, Chief of Police Ken Dubuc, Fire Chief Corey Delikat, Director of Parks & Recreation Trina Nevaril, City Treasurer