HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.574 3 Original Contract
5. 5 7<1 - 3
w:
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
AOREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES AND
METROPOLITAN COMMUNICA nONS CONSULTANTS
This Second Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services between the City of
Port Angeles and Metropolitan Communications Consultants dated May 22, 2001 is made and
entered into by and between the City of Port Angeles, a non-charter code city of the State of
Washington, (hereinafter called "the City"), and Metropolitan Communications Consultants, a
Washington Limited Liability Corporation, (hereinafter called "the Consultant").
WHEREAS, the City has contracted with the Consultant to develop the Port Angeles
telecommunications network, in accordance with the strategic direction recommended in the Port
Angeles telecommunication network business planning analyses, and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has assisted the City in negotiating a cable television franchise
with Northland Cable Television, Inc., which franchise includes provisions for a fiber optic
institutional network (I-Net), and
WHEREAS, the City desires to proceed with utilizing the Consultant's services in the
implementation of the I-Net and to amend the scope of work in the agreement accordingly;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Consultant hereby agree that the Agreement for
Professional Services between the City of Port Angeles and Metropolitan Communications
Consultants dated May 22, 2001 shall be amended by amending I Scope of Work and VI
Compensation, to add the performance of Task IA Northland Backbone Construction (lump sum
$25,000) and Task IIA Fast Track Advisory Services (time and expense not to exceed $20,000), as
set forth in the attached Exhibit "A"'.
Dated this rJ!!.day of ~ ~ ~ , 2002,
CITY OF PORT ANGELES METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS
CONSULTANTS
....
BY:~~
...---- Mayor Glenn Wiggins
,)
~~T
(e$;~~
felJ.lfl1)~
J
By:
Dated (.Q.. J 7 ... O~ ~
Title:
ATTEST:
Dated:
.f)~~\_~
,_,pp,cky J. Vpt City lerk
A iJpro ed as to tern1
/, .1:1/~
C~aig D. Knuts"brr, City Attorney
F.\AGREEMENTS&CONTRACTS\MetComCon amd.wpd
)
'~
~
-
~
-
-
~
--
-
-
METRO PO UT AN
COMMUNICATIONS
CONSULTANTS
Seattle 5847 McKinley AN, Seattle, Washington 98103
Tel 206 522 6778 Fax 206 522 6777
Tacoma PO Box 88907, Sellacoom, Washington 98388
www meeo com
-
--
~
-
-
~
~
-
--
M ErRO PO U TAN
COMMUNICATIONS
CONSULTANTS
Seattle 5847 McKinley AN, Seattle, Washmgton 98103-5710
Tel 206 522 6778 Fax 206 522 6777
Tacoma PO Box 88907, Sellacoom, Washmgton 98388-0907
Tel 2535891770 Fax 2535899254 www mcco com
June 6, 2002
Mr. Larry Dunbar
Power Resources Manager
The City of Port Angeles
321 East Fifth Street
Port Angeles, W A 98362-0217
Subject: Institutional Network
Consulting Services Proposal
In response to your request, we are pleased to submit our proposal, detailed in the attached document, for
consulting services related to the Institutional Network obtained by the City in the renewed Northland Cable
Television franchise The proposal covers the next phase of work in the City's telecommunications initiative
pursuant to the City's strategic direction being carried out step by step, beginning October 2000 and
continued in May and September, 2001. The strategic direction chart, the progress to date, and remaining
steps, are shown on page 1.
The proposal may be authorized in part or in whole, with the appropriate signature below, or by other City
procedure as required. Thank you for your consideration, we look forward to being of service.
Very truly yours,
METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS, LLC
~~'L
Richard C. T. Li, P.E
President
Acknowledged and Accepted by the City of Port Angeles
by
date
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
Institutional Network Consulting Services
June 6, 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal
Relationship of this Request to City Action Plan
and Prior Authorizations
page
Work Outline and Schedule
1
2
2
3
3
Task Descriptions
Proposed Budget
Additional Work, Standard Rate Schedule
Metropolitan Communications Consultants
Company Description
Range of Services
Selected List of Telecommunications Projects
Key Personnel Resumes
4
4
4
7
@ Metropolitan CommUnications Consultants
Proposal
page 1
RELATIONSHIP OF THIS REQUEST TO CITY ACTION PLAN AND PRIOR AUTHORIZATIONS
The successful negotiation of the Northland CATV franchise allows the City's telecommunications action
plan to move in the preferred direction of the City assuming the role of a facilitator/ enabler rather than
that of a developer. The need is thus eliminated for otherwise required capital expenditure (over $10m in
construction cost) and remaining consulting expenses for backbone design, a pilot project, and partner
and consortium network development ($196,058). Accordingly, this work has been cancelled or
terminated.
The chart below shows the relationship of this proposal to the completed and terminated authorizahons
and to anticipated future authorizations, depending on the outcome of option decisions for site drops and
activation. The dotted outline boxes show the completed existing authorizations, including those now
elimmated. The dashed outline box shows possible future authorizations. The bold outline shaded box
shows this request for authorization.
Authorized 10/17/00
A. Telecom and Related
Ordinances (4/10/01)
B. Business Plan (5/1/01)
C. Future Needs & Interests
Report (8/31/01)
Authorized 5/22/01
A. Northland Franchise
Negotiations (5/21/02)
A Pilot Project
(work e d 5/21/02
due successful
nchlse negotiation)
B. Consortiu etwork Planmng
(Work (led 5/21/02 due to
su essful franchise
egotiation)
p----------------,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ll'iUl mn luunrmm 11 mlUUnn
Future Request, if req'd
II. Regular Schedule
B. I-Net Site Drops
C I-Net Activation
Relationship of this Request to City Action Plan and Prior Authorizations
@ Metropolitan Communications Consultants
Proposal
page 2
WORK OUTLINE AND SCHEDULE
The proposed work outIme and schedule for this request is shown in the Gantt chart below. Services for
the Northland I-Net backbone construction project (Tasks IAl-7) have been scheduled to match the
deadlines specified in the franchise ordinance, and will be adjusted as the project proceeds. In addition,
work to support expediting of early I-Net activation is proposed and shown under Fast Track services.
Task
Start
ZOOZ
Z003
Z004
Finish
I. Northland Backbone Services
. .
A. Northland Backbone Construction
Notice to Proceed IA
1. Project Management .
2. I-Net Plans & Specifications ReView
3. Construction Phase Engineering, a~ req'9
4. Fiber Testing Observation
5 Final Inspection & Recommend Acceptance
6. UAC Acceptance
7. Council Acceptance
6/19/02
6/19/02
7/30/02
8/30/02
2/26/04
3/25/04
4/13/04
4/20/04
II. Fast Track Services
A. Fast Track Advisory Services
Notice to Proceed IIA
1. Project Management Support .
2. I-Net Service Agreement Development
3. Service Agreement Negotiation .
4. UAC Acceptance
5. CounCil Acceptance
6/19/02
6/19/02
6/19/02
7/2/02
7/22/02
8/6/02
Fast Track Advisory Services Completed
4/16/04
8/29/02
2/25/04
3/24/04
3/29/04
4/13/04
4/20/04
11/4/02
6/28/02
7/22/02
7/22/02
8/6/02
11/4/02
6119
6/19
7/30 ;1
8/30
F
21:~6~~
4/13
4/20 .. Accept
Work Outline and Schedule
TASK DESCRIPTIONS
Task IA - Northland Backbone Construction (lump sum $25,000)
Tasks IAl-7 related to the Northland I-Net backbone project correspond with the support required for the
City to meet its obligations and deadlines to Northland as specified in Section 8.6 of Ordinance 3116:
1. Project Management- This item covers project client support and representation, assistance with
status reports and presentations, attendance at public meetings (up to 10 each) including UAC and
City Council meetings during the project.
2. I-Net Plans and Specifications Review - This item covers review of Northland plans and
specifications, including conferences and meetings as required, covering the network layout, optical
budgets, I-Net cable plant, node passive termination gear, construction materials, methods and
schedules.
3. Construction Phase Engineering- This item covers construction phase engineering support to the
City, including shop drawing reviews, consultation regarding field problems, and verification of
payment claims. This item does not include construction field mspection, which we understand the
City will provide using its own forces.
4. Fiber Testing Observation - This item covers field and office work to observe the Contractor's OTDR
testmg of the completed fiber installed to verify continuity and conformity WIth optical loss budgets.
@ Metropolitan Communications Consultants
Proposal
page 3
The work will include assistance with test planning and coordination as required to ensure a proper,
timely and efficient test for the benefit of both Northland and the City.
5. Final Inspection and Recommendahon for Acceptance - This item covers one (1) prelIminary and
one (1) final inspection conducted in the field, following Contractor's notice to the City that the
work has been completed and that it is ready for final inspection. All deficiencies discovered at the
preliminary inspection will be recorded in a punch list to be delivered to the Contractor for review
and corrective work prior to the final inspechon. Inspections required beyond the final mspechon
shall be extra work bIlled separately to the City and should be deducted from the Contractor's
retainage. A final report, includmg the Contractor's as-built materials, project photographs, and cost
summary shall be prepared as the basis for an accompanying recommendation for acceptance.
6. and 7. UAC and Council Acceptance - This item covers work and attendance at the final UAC and
Council meetings at which time the project will be presented for acceptance by the City.
Task IIA - Fast Track Advisory Services (time and expense not to exceed $20,000)
Because of the changeable nature of the Fast Track work, a time and expense, not to exceed budget is
proposed. Fast Track Services cover:
1. Project management support (Task IIA1) - including client representation, assistance with status
reports and presentations, attending meetings and working with potential I-Net users, service
providers, vendors and other affected parties to expedite early activation of the I-Net. This item also
includes review assistance with fiber lease and master or other permit, vendor or provider
qualifications, and advisory services from the time an I-Net services agreement has been executed to
the date service is delivered, herein scheduled at November 4 2002.
2. Development of I-Net service agreement to be used in negotiations with provider (Task IIA2).
3. Assistance during service agreement negotiations (Task IIA3).
4. and 5 UAC and Council Acceptance - This item covers work and attendance at the UAC and
Council meetings at which time the service agreement will be presented for acceptance by the CIty.
PROPOSED BUDGET
The work covered by this proposal is estimated to require the time and expense budgets shown below.
Item
Task IAl-7
Task IIAl-6
Description
Northland Backbone Construction
Fast Track Advisory Services
Fee Basis
Lump Sum
Time & Expense
Proposed Budget
25,000
20,000
$45,000
Total, Proposed Budget, all tasks
ADDITIONAL WORK, STANDARD RATE SCHEDULE
Additional work requested, outside the scope of work of this proposal, may be done on a negotiated
lump sum basis or at the standard rates listed below.
Description
Laborchargejhour
Direct project expenses
Technician
$40 to $70
Engineer/Analyst
$80 to $170
Principal
$195
reimbursed at actual cost plus 10% based on receipts presented.
Includes, travel and lodging expenses (not travel time), direct project
supplies and expenses.
@ Metropolitan Communications Consultants
Metropolitan Communications Consultants
page 4
COMPANY DESCRIPTION
Metropolitan Communications Consultants (MCC) is a member of the Carlson Group of Companies and
is a Washington limited liability company formed June 3, 1996. MCC operates from offices in Tacoma
and Seattle, Washington.
Dr. F. Paul Carlson and Richard C. T. Li, the two principals of MCC, have worked together since 1992,
and in telecommunications consulting smce 1993.
MCC has been assisting municipalities in advanced telecommunications since 1993, three years prior to
the passage of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Since then, MCC has helped many clients meet the
complexities of the new telecommunications environment, while also being aware and responsive to
substantial new opportunities created. An example has been the obtaining of community and economic
development telecommunications benefits from cable television network franchising and upgrading. The
fIrm has proven technical and business expertise, and can work individually or with other experts as
required to provide the solution to match a client's desires and needs.
RANGE OF SERVICES
MCC principals have many years of experience working for cities, municipalities and utilities and have
managed comprehensive and complex telecommunications projects in both the municipal and private
fields. In the past nme years, MCC has served clients with a wide range of telecommunications and
related cable television consulting services, from vision setting, feasibility studies, business and financing
plans, design, and construction project management. The firm has also assisted clients with
telecommunications ordinance and franchise preparation, public forums, partnership and consortium
building, and negotiations with providers and other telecommunications companies.
Through its previous work, MCC has relationships with major equipment manufacturers and vendors
(AT&T, Corning, ADC Telecommunications, Cisco, Marconi, Nortel), telecommunications contractors
(Lockheed Martin Services, Inc., Fluor Daniel, Optec Inc.), and can obtain assistance and expertise on
changing industry developments that might influence planning and policy decisions. We also work with
leading telecommunications attorneys -- Preston, Gates and Ellis (Seattle, W A) and Winstead Sechrest
and Minick (Austin, TX), as well as other specialists. MCC believes that by pooling complementary
expertise, it offers Its clients an integrated team approach resulting in a superior product and service.
SELECTED LIST OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROJECTS
Metropolitan Communication Consultants has successfully worked on numerous projects, including:
. The City of Port Angeles
MCC began assisting the City of Port Angeles in a comprehensive telecommunications initiative,
arising from the City's economic development goals, beginning in late 2000. Since then, following
MCC's action plan, development and updating of telecommunications and related ordinances has
been completed (October 2000), a telecommunications business plan was completed (May 2001), and a
new cable teleVIsion franchise has been negotiated (May 2002).
The negotiated cable franchise is notable in that area-wide broadband telecommunications benefits for
the City and community were obtained from the cable operator, enabling the City to avoid its own
development of infrastructure (at a cost of over $10 million) and the accompanying unwanted role of
being a network operator in competition with private commercial providers.
@ Metropolitan Communications Consultants
Metropolitan Communications Consultants
page 5
. The City of Ellensburg, Washington (pop. 13,600)
Mr. Robert J. Titus, Director of Energy Services (Telephone: 509-962-7226)
In its inihal studies in 1997, MCC identified a unique opportunity for Ellensburg, and the City's
telecommunications project, which was otherwIse marginal, became distinctly feasible, even as a
stand-alone proposihon for the City by itself. The City's project now completed and in operahon,
consists of a 14-mile ring of 24-strand optical fiber, 7 hubs, and 38 miles of 6-strand fiber drops to 48
sites. The City's partners in the project include Central Washington University, the Ellensburg School
District, Kittitas County, Kittitas County PUD No.1, and Kittcom, the 911 emergency services agency.
Particular telecommunications projects for the City of Ellensburg include:
- Institutional Network Equipment, Vendor Design/Installation Project, spring 2001.
- Institutional Network Optical Fiber Installation Project, January 2000.
- Institutional Network Policies and Standards, 2001.
- Institutional Network Management and Operations Plan, 2001.
- Institutional Network Ownership Negotiations and Agreement, May 1999.
- Institutional Network Requirements Report, January 21, 1999.
- Institutional Network Feasibility Study, March 1, 1998.
MCC has also completed, as an Ellensburg related project, a telecommunications franchise and
successful negotiation with Level 3 Communications for Kittitas County, one of the City's partners.
Similar negotiations with GTE and AT&T were completed for the Cities of Mount Vernon and Federal
Way, WA, in 2000-2001.
. The City of Richland, Washington (pop 38,708)
Ms. Jill Monley, Deputy City Manager, Administrative and Community Services, (509-942-7308)
Mr. Tom Lampson, City Attorney (Telephone' 509-942-7385)
Since early 1996, Metropolitan Communications Consultants has worked with the City of Richland to
develop a high-speed telecommunications infrastructure. The eventual system, consisting of a 28-mile,
six hub, 24-strand fiber optic instituhonal network, was completed in 2001 and is now in operation.
MCC is continuing to assist the City in ongoing development of the network.
Particular telecommunications projects for the City of Richland include:
- Institutional Network Policies, Standards and Extensions, currently ongoing.
- Institutional Network Equipment, Vendor Design/Installation Project, spring 2001.
- Institutional Network Optical Fiber Installation Project, July 2000.
- Institutional Network Policies and Standards, in process.
- Institutional Network Management and Operations Plan, in process.
- I-Net Financing Plan, October 21, 1999.
- Instituhonal Network Requirements Report, December 22, 1998.
- Cable Television Franchise Ordinance No. 17-98, September 8, 1998.
- TCI Cablevision Franchise Renewal Negotiations, June-September, 1998
- Future Cable-Related Community Needs and Interests Report, May 26, 1998.
- Telecommunications Ordinance, January 6, 1998.
1998 MUnICIpaL AchIevement special award from Association of Washington Cities, June 1998.
- Integrated Telecommunications Infrastructure Plan, Public Information and Involvement Program
Strategy and Presentation Materials, May 8, 1997.
- Integrated Telecommunications Infrastructure Plan and Technical Appendices, Feb. 20, 1997.
@ Metropolitan Communications Consultants
Metropolitan Communications Consultants
page 6
. Other Projects
Other projects, both current and completed, include:
City of Walla Walla, WA (pop. 26,500)
- Cable television franchise renewal, in process.
Reference: Mr. Hal Thomas, Director of Public Works, telephone: 509-527-4463
The City of Yakima (pop. 73,040)
- Telecommunications and Technology Planning Project, January 2001.
Reference Mr. Randy Beehler, Telecommunications Division Manager, (509) 575-6092
The City of Centralia (pop. 13,600)
- Telecommunications Ordinance and Related Regulatory Work, July 2000.
Reference: Mr. Richard Southworth, Utilities Director, (360) 330-7512
City of Federal Way, WA (pop. 83,259)
- Negotiation of I-Net Agreement, concluded January 4,2000.
Reference: Iwen Wang, Administration Division Manager, (253) 661-4061
Tacoma Public Utilities
- Busmess Planning, Tacoma Telecommunicahons Study, 1997.
Springfield Utility Board (SUB), Springfield, Oregon,
- An Evaluation of Telecommunications Options for the SUB Portion of EjS Telecom, April 10, 1997.
Eugene Water & Electric Board/Springfield Utility Board
- EjS Telecom, Development Implementation Plan, October 14, 1996.
- Telecommunications Infrastructure Business Plan, unpublished report, June 15, 1996.
- Telecommunications Infrastructure Feasibility Study, August 31, 1995.
Fluor Daniel Telecom
- Telecommunications Infrastructure Development and Evolution, A Confidential Assessment
prepared for Mr. John Berndt, President, Fluor Daniel Telecom, Dallas TX, March 25, 1997.
OGI Telecomm
- Business Plan for Alternative Exchange Carrier and Competitive Access Provlder Services, August
1995. (by Carlson Consultants, LLC)
Metropolitan Communications Consortium Partners
- Proposal to the City of Seattle for the Seattle Information Highway, 81 pp. plus attachments,
October 14, 1994. (by Richard C. T. Li, Inc. and Carlson Consultants, LLC)
Snohomish County PUD No.1,
- Fiber Optic Industry Study, July 1994. (by Richard C. T. Li, Inc. and Carlson Consultants, LLC)
Metropolitan Communications Authority, Inc.
- Seattle Information Highway Project FmanClal Models, August 1993. (by Richard C. T. Li, Inc. and
Carlson Consultants, LLC)
- Metropolitan Communications Authority, Inc., A Study of Telecommunications Companies in
Washington State, July 1993. (by Richard C. T. Li, Inc. and Carlson Consultants, LLC)
@ Metropolitan Communications Consultants
Metropolitan Communications Consultants
page 7
KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES
Brief resumes of key members of MCC are presented below:
Richard C. T. Li, P.E.
Telephone: 206-522-6778
Mr. Richard Li has been a consulting engineer since 1972, and is co-
founder and President of Metropolitan Communications Consultants.
Mr. Li has extensive experience working with cities, towns, municipal
agencies and private clients throughout the Northwest. He specializes in
planning, studies, and project management and has completed hundreds
of assignments covering the full range of engineering services for
municipal and utilIty projects.
Since 1992, Mr. Li has been engaged specifically as a telecommunications
consultant, affiliated with the Carlson Group since 1992, and now directly
through MCC since 1996. He has worked with numerous cities and pubic
and private clients providing consulting services in telecommunications policy and regulatory work;
feasibility, business and financing plans; designs, implementation and continuing system development.
In addition to his MCC clients, Mr. Li's municipal and utility clients have also included the Seattle Water
Department, Snohomish County PUD No.1, King County Metropolitan Services, Energy Northwest, and
cities, towns and utility dIstricts throughout the Pacific Northwest.
Mr. Li has a M.S. in Civil Engineering (Sanitary) from the University of Washington and is a Professional
Engineer licensed in Washington and previously in Oregon, Idaho and California.
F. Paul Carlson, Ph.D., P.E.
Telephone: 253-589-1770
Dr. Paul Carlson is co-founder of Metropolitan Communications
Consultants (MCC), and CEO of the Carlson Group of Companies, of
which MCC is a member company.
Dr. Carlson has participated in numerous telecommunications projects
performed for private clients and public agencies. Dr. Carlson is a
consultant to Lucent Technologies in New Jersey and Dallas, Cascade
Microtech, Inc., in Portland, Oregon and the Frank Russell Company in
Tacoma. Other consulting activities have been in business reengineering
and restructuring projects in Saudi Arabia, at Lucent Power Systems, AT&T Microelectronics, Cascade
Microtech, Inc., Atcall, Inc., and numerous startup and early-stage development companies.
Prior to becoming a consultant, Dr. Carlson was Vice President, Strategy and Business Development, at
Honeywell, Inc. from 1988 to 1991. Between 1977 and 1988 he was President and CEO of Oregon
Graduate Center, where he also founded OGI Telecomm, a shared tenant service provider (STS).
He has served on the boards of numerous high technology and Fortune 500 companies including Frank
Russell Trust Company, Tektronix, PacifiCorp, Logic Automation (Synopsis), Cascade Microtech, Inc.,
Barrett Enclosures, Inc., Atcall, Inc., Simutech, LLC, and Integrated Data Communications (IDC), Inc.
Dr. Carlson has a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Washington, where he was a
Professor of Electrical Engineering for 10 years and is a Registered Engineer in Washington and Oregon.
@ Metropolitan Communications Consultants
Metropolitan Communications Consultants
page 8
l Clarence A. West, Attorney-at-law
Winstead Sechrest and Minick P. C.
Specialist Legal Consultant
Mr. West has had a primary focus on telecommunication law for over a
decade. Mr. West has represented franchising authorities throughout
the nation on matters including franchise fee compliance issues,
negotiations of cable teleVIsion, telecommunications and right-of-way
use agreements pursuant to state and federal law.
As former City Attorney of the City of Houston, Mr. West represented
the City in franchise fee claims against the local telephone franchise on
underpaid franchise fees, which resulted in a multimillion-dollar
settlement to the City of Houston. He has subsequently represented a
number of cities throughout the nation on franchise fee claIms, which
has resulted ill an excess of $10 million being recouped by those cities, such as Austin and Fort Worth,
Texas, Memphis, Tennessee, Mercer Island, Washington, and Prince George's County, Maryland. Clients
have also been current landowners of multi-tenant residential commercial properties, which may require
telecommunication services.
Representative city clients include: Austin, Bay town, League City, Pasadena, Texas City, Wharton, Cedar
Park, Dallas and Fort Worth, Texas; Auburn, New York; Memphis, Tennessee; Mercer Island, Richland,
Ellensburg, Washington; Takoma Park, Maryland and Prince George's County, Maryland.
Selected Papers and Publications
. "Cable and Telcom Franchising After the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Amended
Texas Public Utility Regulatory Act of 1995", Texas Association of Telecommunications Officers and
Advisors Conference (TATOA); Austin, Texas, 1996.
. "FranchIsing and Contracting Issues for Local Governments," Panel Moderator, Annual Conference
National Institute of Municipal Law Officers ("NIMLO"), Chicago, Illinois, 1995.
. "Local Regulatory Role of Cities Over "Nontraditional" Cable Television Systems (or What You can
Do With Those Other Guys -- HSD, DBS, SMATV, MDS and Telephone and Cable Television and
other Telecommunication Service Providers)", presentation to NATOA Conference, 1994.
. "Local Franchising Requirements (and Obligations) in Providing "Video Dialtone" Service", 35
Municipal Attorney 158 (1994)
. "Knock, Knock, Let Me In -- An Overview of the Legal Issues Surrounding Building Access for
Telecommunication Service Providers", presentation to law firm of Dow, Cogburn & Friedman (1996)
Education
B.A. with Honors (Political Science, Philosophy jMathematics, minor); University of Houston, 1973.
J.D. - Bates College of Law, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, 1976.
Professional Memberships and Associations
American Bar Associahon, Past Section on Public Law.
International Institute for Municipal Law Officers, Section Chair on Utilities and Franchises.
Houston Bar Association.
Texas City Attorneys' Association.
@ Metropolitan Communications Consultants
/'
5.5,<I-A
AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES AND
METROPOLITAN COMMUNICA TIONS CONSULTANTS
This Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services between the City of Port
Angeles and Metropolitan Communications Consultants dated May 22,2001 is made and entered
into by and between the City of Port Angeles, a non-charter code city of the State of Washington,
(hereinafter called "the City"), and Metropolitan Communications Consultants, a Washington
Limited Liability Corporation, (hereinafter called "the Consultant").
WHEREAS, the City has contracted with the Consultant to develop the Port Angeles
telecommunications network, in accordance wIth the strategic dIrection recommended in the Port
Angeles telecommunication network business planning analyses, and
WHEREAS, the City desires to proceed with Tasks V and VI, relating to consortium
planning and consortium partner solicitation and to amend the scope of work in the agreement
accordingly;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Consultant hereby agree that the Agreement for
Professional Services between the City of Port Angeles and Metropolitan Communications
Consultants dated May 22, 2001 shall be amended by amendmg I Scope of Work and VI
Compensation, to add the performance of Task V Consortium Planning and Task VI Consortium
Partner Solicitation, as set forth in the attached Exhibit "A".
Dated this 1!-~y ofq.l J\ 0 -- ,2001.
leA TIONS
,
By:
By:
Dated t.o - J ~ - D I
Title:
f rfJ; ~~
~(',;I()}
ATTEST:
Dated:
G \EXCHANGE\PWKS\MetComCon amd wpd
',,\ ('"
EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF WORK
page 2
RECOMMENDED STRATEGIC DIRECTION AND WORK SEQUENCE
The tasks in the dotted outline box are covered by the City's exisbng authorizations, issued 10/17/00
and 5/22/01. The bold outline shaded tasks are the items covered by the current request for
authorization
Recommended Strategic Diredion
I. CATV II. CATV Franchise
Franchise Scenario Z
Renewal Negotiations
A. Public Proceeding A. Franchise
Ordinance
8 Future Needs & - Negotiations
- Interests Report 0
.... -
- N
- N Broadband
0 -
B. Ascertainment 1ft
- Partnership I
"IIlI Report, and "IIlI i I-Net, PEG &
CIl CIl Negotiated? ~
.!::! Draft Ordinance .!::! community
..
.. 0 Yes
0 for Negotiations i benefits
.&l .&l i
..
.. III I
III C
C B. Adoption of
,. Franchise
Ordinance
B Pilot Bidding
and Award
C. Build Pilot
D Integrate Pilot
Into Network
D. Determine .
~J':",-"4-''''\Y>>'i~,,,p.,11 '':lli;ill'L >~/ J i
,,' ;,', :Strategrc':.G, ""tr' ':I:~
.'.:'~ ":Relationshlps.-:-
VlI.Consortium
Building
A. Consortium
Agreements
B. Negotiations
C. Execute
Agreements
D, Begin Consortium
Operations
-
o
-
N
N
-
1ft .
1 IV. Pilot Projed
.!::!
. A. Pilot DefinitIon and
.&l
'S DeSign
C'
No
City Development (Scenario 1)
Port Angeles Telecommunications Network Implementation
Metropolitan Communications Consultants
Confidential and Proprietary
Exhibit A- Scope of Work
page 3
PRIOR AUTHORIZATIONS
Task I - Cable Franchise Renewal Proceedings (10/17/00)
A. Public Proceedings
B. Ascertainment Report and Draft Ordinance
Task II - Scenario 2 Negotiations (5/22/01)
A. Franchise Ordmance Negohations
B. FranchIse Ordinance Adoption
Task III - Other Scenario Negotiations (5/22/01)
A Continuing development work with service providers and other applicable parties
through Task II B.
Task IV - Pilot Project (5/22/01)
A. Pilot Project Definition and Design.
CURRENT AUTHORIZATION REQUEST
Task V - Consortium Planning
A Consortium Structure
B. Policies and Procedures
C. Functional Operations
D Competencies Required
E. Partner Design Requirements
F. Investment Required
G. Return Opportunities
Task VI - Consortium Partner Solicitation
A. Prepare RFP's
B. RFP Process
C. Evaluate Responses
D. Determine Strategic Relationships
E. Recommend Partners
FUTURE WORK (NOT IN THIS AUTHORIZATION)
Task IV - Pilot Project (estimated Total Project Cost $350,000)
B. Pilot Project Bid Solicitation and A wards
C. Build Pilot Project
D. Integrate Pilot into Network
Task VII - Consortium Building
Task VIII - Network Implementation
Metropolitan Communications Consultants
Confidential and Proprietary
Exhibit A- Scope of Work
page 4
WORK SCHEDULE
The schedule for the work under this proposal is shown on the following Gantt chart.
Task
V. Con~ortium Planning ~
A. Consortium Structure
B. Policies and Procedures
C. Functional Operations
D. Competencies Required
E. Partner Design Requir~ments
F. Investment Required
G. Return Opportunities
- -- -
H. UAC Accept<:~ce
I. Council Acceptance
6/01
11/01 12/01
8/01
9/01
I
1 % 1
I
6/19
~-'6/19
6/19
6/19
6/19~~.
VI. Consortium Partner Solicitation
A. Prepare RFYs
B. RFP Process
C. RFP Evaluations
D. Determin~_.?~!ategi~R.~I.ationship~~.___
E. Recommend Partners
__~~AC Acceptanc~__..___.___
G. Council Acceptance
BUDGET ESTIMATES
The work covered by thIS proposal IS estimated to require the time and expense budgets shown below.
Item
Task V
Task VI
Description
Consortium Planning
Consorhum Partner Solicitation
Proposed Budget
25,000
25,000
$50,000
Fee Basis
T&E
T&E
Total, Estimated Budget Required, all tasks
ADDITIONAL WORK, STANDARD HOURLY RATES AND EXPENSES
Additional work requested, outside the scope of work of this proposal, may be done on a negotiated
lump sum basis or at the standard rates listed below.
Description
Laborchargejhour
Direct project expenses
Technician
$40 to $70
Engineerl Analyst
$80 to $170
Principal
$195
reimbursed at actual cost plus 10% based on receipts presented
Metropolitan Communications Consultants
Confidential and Proprietary
-'
5.57~
"I
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES
AND
METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS
RELATING TO: COMMUNITY TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLANNING
THIS AGREEMENT IS made and entered Into this 2:zd day of May 2001, by and between THE CITY OF
PORT ANGELES, a non-charter code city of the State of Washington, (hereinafter called the "CITY") and
METROPOLITAN COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS, a Washington limited liability Corporation
(hereinafter called the "CONSUL TANT").
WHEREAS, the CITY desires to develop the Port Angeles Telecommunications Network, in accordance with
the strategic direction recommended in the Port Angeles Telecommunications Network Business Planning
Analyses, and
WHEREAS, the CITY desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a qualified consulting firm
to perform the scope of work as detailed in Exhibits A, and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that It IS in full compliance with the statutes of the State of
Washington for professional registration and/or other applicable requirements, and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that it has the background, experience, and ability to perform the
required work In accordance With the standards of the profeSSion, and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that it will provide qualified personnel and appropriate faCIlities
necessary to accomplish the work;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above representations and the terms, conditions, covenants and
agreements set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows:
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of professional services to be performed and the results to be achieved by the CONSULTANT shall
be as detailed In the attached Exhibit A and shall include all services and material necessary to accomplish the
work.
The CITY may review applicable segments of the CONSULTANT'S work product at the designated milestones
set up In the CONSULTANT'S Work Outline and Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Upon completion of
review, the City shall approve the work segment or request revisions if the work segment is incomplete or
unsatisfactory If the work segment is not satisfactory, the CONSULTANT shall make such changes as may be
required by the CITY Such changes shall not constitute "Extra Work" as related in Section XI of this
Agreement
The CONSULTANT agrees that all services performed under this Agreement shall be in accordance with the
standards of the profession and in compliance with applicable federal, state and local laws.
The Scope of Work may be amended upon written approval of both parties.
II OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Upon completion of the work, all documents, exhibits, photographic negatives, or other presentations of the
work shall become the property of the CITY for use without restriction and without representation as to
sUitability for reuse by any other party unless specifically verified or adapted by the CONSULTANT. However,
any alteration or reuse of the documents, by the City or by others acting through or on behalf of the City, will be
at the City's sole risk.
City of Port Angeles
page 1
5/17/2001
II.. .. ..... ~ .. J
..... \" i""
.. I ~ "'" ,. ~ . "
to
III DESIGNATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
Each party shall designate ItS representatives In writing The CONSU L T ANT'S representative shall be subject
to the approval of the CITY.
IV TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The CONSULTANT may begin work upon execl!hon. of this Agreement by both parties. The work shall be
completed in accordance with the schedule set forth in the attached Exhibit A
V PAYMENT
The CITY shall pay the CONSULTANT as set forth in this section of the Agreement. Such payment shall be full
compensation for work performed, services rendered, and all labor, matenals, supplies, equipment and
inCidentals necessary to complete the work
A. Payment shall be time and expense on the basis of the CONSULTANT'S total budget reqUired as set forth
in attached Exhibit A - Scope of Work, Tasks II and III, and Section VI Compensation below.
B. Payment shall be lump sum on the basis of the CONSULTANT'S total budget reqUired as set forth In
attached Exhibit A - Scope of Work, Task IV A and Section VI Compensation below.
B. The CONSULTANT shall submit Invoices to the CITY on a monthly basis. Invoices shall detail the work;
shall indicate the specific task or activity in the Scope of Work to which the costs are related; shall indicate
the percentage completion for each task; and shall indicate the cumulative total for each task.
C. The CITY shall review the invoices and make payment for the percentage of the project that has been
completed less the amounts previously paid.
D. The CONSULTANT inVOices are due and payable Within 30 days of receipt. In the event of a disputed
billing, only the disputed portion Will be withheld from payment.
E. Final payment for the balance due to the CONSULTANT will be made upon the completion of the work
and acceptance by the CITY.
F. Payment for "Extra Work" performed under Section XI of this Agreement shall be as agreed to by the
parties in wntlng.
VI COMPENSATION
Unless otherwise agreed to in wntlng by both parties, the CONSULTANT'S total compensation under this
Agreement, including labor, direct non-salary reimbursable costs and outside services, shall not exceed the
amounts as shown in attached Exhibit A.
VII EMPLOYMENT
Employees of the CONSULTANT, while engaged In the performance of any work or services under this
Agreement, shall be considered employees of the CONSULTANT only and not of the CITY, and claims that
may anse under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any
and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any negligent act or omission on the part of the
CONSULTANT'S employees while so engaged, on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein,
shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the CONSULTANT.
In performing this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall not employ or contract With any CITY employee without
the City's written consent.
VIII NONDISCRIMINATION
The CONSULTANT shall conduct ItS bUSiness in a manner, which assures fair, equal and non-discriminatory
City of Port Angeles
page 2
5/17/2001
treatment of all persons, without respect to race, creed or national Origin, or other legally protected
classification and, In particular:
A. The CONSULTANT shall maintain open hiring and employment practices and will welcome applications
for employment in all positions, from qualified individuals who are members of minorities protected by
federal equal opportunity/affirmative action requirements; and,
B. The CONSULTANT shall comply with all requirements of applicable federal, state or local laws or
regulations issued pursuant thereto, relating to the establishment of non discriminatory requirements In
hiring and employment practices and assuring the service of all persons without discrimination as to any
person's race, color, religion, sex, Vietnam era veteran status, disabled veteran condition, physical or
mental handicap, or national origin.
IX SUBCONTRACTS
A. The CONSULTANT shall not sublet or assign any of the work covered by thiS Agreement without the
written consent of the CITY.
B The CONSULTANT will be using the firms submitted With ItS proposal as subcontractors. Subcontractors
other than those listed shall not be permitted Without the written consent of the CITY.
C. In all solicitation either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the CONSULTANT for work to be
performed pursuant to a subcontract, including procurement of materials and equipment, each potential
subconsultant or supplier shall be notified by the CONSULTANT of Consultant's obligations under this
Agreement, including the nondiscrimination requirements.
X CHANGES IN WORK
Other than changes directed by the CITY as set forth In Section I above, either party may request changes in
the scope of work. Such changes shall not become part of this Agreement unless and until mutually agreed
upon and incorporated herein by written amendments to this Agreement executed by both parties.
XI EXTRA WORK
The CITY may desire to have the CONSULTANT perform work or render services In connection with this
project, in addition to the Scope of Work set forth in Exhibit A and minor revisions to satisfactorily completed
work. Such work shall be considered as "Extra Work" and shall be addressed In a wntten supplement to thiS
Agreement. The CITY shall not be responsible for paying for such extra work unless and until the written
supplement is executed by both parties
XII TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. The CITY may terminate thiS Agreement at any time upon not less than ten (10) days written notice to the
CONSULTANT Written notice will be by certified mail sent to the consultant's designated representative
at the address provided by the CONSULTANT
B. In the event this Agreement IS terminated prior to the completion of the work, a final payment shall be
made to the CONSULTANT, WhiCh, when added to any payments previously made, shall compensate the
CONSULTANT for the percentage of work completed.
C. In the event thiS Agreement is terminated prior to completion of the work, documents that are the property
of the CITY pursuant to Section II above, shall be delivered to and received by the CITY prior to transmittal
of final payment to the CONSULTANT.
XIII INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS
The CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify the CITY from any claims, damages, losses, and costs, including, but
not limited to, attorney's fees and litigation costs, arising out of claims by third parties for property damage and
bodily Injury, Including death, caused solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of the CONSULTANT,
City of Port Angeles
page 3
5/17/2001
CONSULTANT employees, affiliated corporations, officers, and subcontractors In connection with the work
performed under this Agreement.
The CITY agrees to indemnify the CONSULTANT from any claims, damages, losses, and costs, including, but
not limited to, attorney's fees and litigation costs, arising out of claims by third parties for property damage and
bodily injury, including death, caused solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY, CITY's
employees, or agents in connection with the work performed under this Agreement
If the negligence or willful misconduct of both CONSULTANT and CITY (or a person Identified above for whom
each is liable) is a cause of such damage or injury, the loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between the
CONSULTANT and the CITY in proportion to their relative degrees of negligence or willful misconduct and the
right of indemnity shall apply for such proportion.
Should a court of competent Jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24 115, then, in the
event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or
resulting from the concurrent negligence of the CONSULTANT and the CITY, its officers, officials, employees,
and volunteers, the CONSULTANT'S liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the CONSULTANT'S
negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein
constitutes the CONSULTANT'S waiver of immunity under Industnallnsurance, TItle 51 RCW, solely for the
purposes of this indemnification. The parties have mutually negotiated this waiver. The proviSions of this
section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. However, the CONSULTANT expressly
reserves its rights as a third person set forth in RCW 51.24.035.
XIV INSURANCE
The CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for
injuries to persons or damage to property which may anse from or in connection with the performance of the
work hereunder by the CONSULTANT, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
The CONSULTANT shall provide a Certificate af Insurance evidencing
1. Automobile liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per aCCident for
bodily injury and property damage; and,
2. Commercial General liability insurance written on an occurrence basIs with limits no less than $1,000,000
combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for personal Injury, bodily injury and property
damage. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations;
broad form property damage; explosion, collapse and underground (XCU) if applicable; and employer's
liability; and,
3. Professional Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 limit per occurrence.
Any payment of deductible or self insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the CONSULTANT.
The CITY shall be named as an additional Insured on the Commercial General Liability Insurance policy, as
respects work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant and a copy of the endorsement naming the CITY
as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The CITY reserves the nght to
review a certified copy of all required insurance policies in the CONSULTANT'S office.
The CONSULTANT'S Insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each
Insured against whom claim IS made or suit IS brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability.
The CONSULTANT'S insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the CITY, and the CITY shall be given
thirty (30) days prior written notice of any cancellation, suspension or matenal change In coverage.
XV APPLICABLE LAW
This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington,
and In the event of dispute the venue of any litigation brought hereunder shall be Clallam County.
City of Porl Angeles
page 4
5/17/2001
XVI EXHIBITS AND SIGNATURES
This Agreement, including its exhibits, constitutes the entire Agreement, supersedes all prior written or oral
understandings, and may only be changed by a written amendment executed by both parties. The following
exhibits are hereby made a part of this Agreement:
Exhibit A - Scope of Work, Budget Estimates, Project Schedule, Work Outline and Schedule
In WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written
above
CITY OF PORT ANGELES
g::r:;1:ATIONS CONSULTANTS
PRESIDENT
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
(?,/7~
CRA~N~Y ATTORNEY
ATTEST'
BECKY UPTO ,CITY. l.ER~-^-=-------
,~ ( ,.-
City of Port Angeles
page 5
5/17/2001
EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF WORK
page 1
RECOMMENDED STRATEGIC DIRECTION AND WORK SEQUENCE
MCC recommends the strategic direction and sequence of work outlined in the schematic below. The
tasks in the dotted outline box are covered by the City's existing authorizahon, issued October 17, 200l.
The bold outline shaded tasks are the items covered by the current request for authorization
I Recommended Strategic Direction ~
,
.................. ...
CATV Franchise CATV Franchise
"'- Renewal ~ Scenario Z
, Negotiations
~ , ~ , .' . .
. . ,
Public Proceeding , r
, , ,
Future Needs & Y . \- , . ,
Cable Operator . . . .
't:I Interests Report Proposal
CIl
.!:! ; .
..
0 City
.c:; Informal/Formal
-
::I Negotiations Draft Negotiations
cc
III
CIl
.. Request for Needs & Interests
..
::I . Adoption of
0 Proposal Broadband Capability Yes
III "'- Franchise
CIl Reasonably Met?
IlC ,
Ordinance
J
" 'i'l ,4
No ,I;
,if Stop Other Negotiations
-.1 ~
'1 Other Scenario (3 and 4) Negotiations
, if t
Pilot Project Consortium Consortium
Partner Partner -Consortium
Pilot Definition Development Solicitation Building
DeSign Specs
Consortium Consortium
Pilot DeSign Consortium Proposals Agreements
Design Review I Planning Evaluate Responses Negotiations
Structure and
Build Pilot Organization Determme Strategic Execute Agreements
Test Pilot
PoliCY and Relationships
Integrate Pilot Planning Begm Consortium
Into Network Recommend Partners Operations
Functional Operations . \
.,
No r. f
,If
City Development (Scenario 1)
If . 'If ' If
--
Port Angeles Telecommunications Network Implementation
\- \
,
.
~ . ,<,\. ...
. \ '
. '.
'I-
Metropolitan Communications Consultants
Confidential and Proprietary
Exhibit A- Scope of Work
page 2
PRIOR AUTHORIZATION (10/17/00)
Task I - Cable Franchise Renewal Proceedings
A. Public Proceedmgs
B. Ascertainment Report and Draft Ordinance
CURRENT AUTHORIZATION REQUEST
Task II - Scenario 2 Negotiations
A. Franchise Ordinance Negotiations
1 PartnershIp Requirements
2. Network Requirements
3. Cost ReqUIrements
4. Schedule Requirements
5. Prepare Final Ordinance
B. Franchise Ordinance Adoption
1. ASSIstance during Franchise Ordinance Adoption Process
Task III - Other Scenario Negotiations
A. Continuing development work with service providers and other applicable parties
through Task II B
Task IV - Pilot Project
A. PIlot Project Definition and Design.
1. Demonstration Goals
2. Users, Providers and Services
3. Fiber DeSIgn & Bid Documents
4. Equipment DeSIgn & Purchase Documents
5. Pre-BId Cost Estimate
6 City Financing Advisory Services
FUTURE WORK (NOT IN THIS AUTHORIZATION)
Task IV - Pilot Project (estimated Total Project Cost $350,000)
B. Pilot Project Bid Solicitation and Awards
C. Fiber Construction and Equipment Installation.
Task V - Consortium Planning
Task VI - Consortium Partner Solicitation
Task VII - Consortium Building
Task VIII - Network Implementation
BUDGET ESTIMATES
The work covered by this proposal is estimated to require the trme and expense budgets shown below.
Item
Task II
Task III
Task IV A
Description
Scenario 2 Negotiations
Other Scenario Negotiations
Pilot Project Definition and Design
Fee Basis
Time and Expense
Time and Expense
Lump Sum
Proposed Budget
$25,000
$20,000
$35,000
$80,000
Total, Estrmated Budget Required, all tasks
Metropolitan Communications Consultants
ConfIdentIal and Propnetary
. .
Exhibit A- Scope of Work
page 3
ADDITIONAL WORK, STANDARD HOURLY RATES AND EXPENSES
Additional work requested, outside the scope of work of this proposal, may be done on a negotiated
lump sum basis or at the standard rates listed below
Description
Laborchargejhour
Direct project expenses
Technician Engineer/Analyst Principal
$40 to $70 $80 to $170 $195
rermbursed at actual cost plus 10% based on receipts presented
WORK SCHEDULE
The schedule is shown on the following Gantt charts.
Metropolitan CommunIcations Consultants
Confidential and Proprietary
Till
9/00 10100 11/00 12/00 1101
2/01
3/01
4/01
5/01
6/01
7/01
8/01
9/01
10/01 11/01
~
I I I I
_ _ ... ___ - +- - ---- - -~- - -4- --; -
I. Cable Fruch!.. Renewal Proceedings (Funded) " _ ,~_ ___u ~.___-!__.
- -. CUre Operator_ Rell,-wal ~eq.esi - - _ ~ ~{3 -+!~ -- 4 - : ~ -~ ..~~..m __ H' uu __+
~. Puhllc Procee~lng.. _ __ _ .u \
+ . --- -----,.--- r---.-- --1---
_u._~_'_!'!.~~r~~ls_Preparatlo~____u_H_ ' 'u___ ,. -, __---+-__ ~__u~ - -t-
a. Web survey, Interview forms ~- - -12/18 '
-~:-~=~:~~~t~~lY~;~~~~:~.~~~:::~:-:~-:'--- - .-- i _u_ t-- _. ,- 2/1i -,-- . ,.-.:.=-~--- -c .._~u_
_.__~_~~n~r~l_publicinput. ------- -- .:, 2/24 '~_~.'.:~n_ .' ' . .-
c PEG stakeholder input ---- -;---- t-.----,. 2/24 , - j . ---r ----~---.- _'u -
.:: _ ~:.I~~-et slike~olderlnput . - t---. . , '--r 2/24 _, - . -- -- + n -- , -t. uu. -4 -.t -.- .-
3 PubhcMeetings ~==--[:=~:~--:~-~-:~=~:=--L.==-, -- -j .- n-i- -~[=--l----;---- n'
. ._:i- _p_~bifc_~~e8ng _- ===_:: -_ -= --. I I . 3/29 . , ----r-- i -- _u_ ~- -- Lnnn
b Needs and Solutions Workshop ------t-- .-- t u.-=j_:.- ~.~,'. ----__-_:-_-=~:__3/~0-~-- --; -- ---.:~-==J:::---:-=:~::--'- -,-----
-_. B. AScet~__t.~~)e....rt__'Drlft~.r~Ii~~~::__- __ --.:-.:_:--'.:I".:.-~_-_ + ... --, _ _ I. ,- ----.r . _ l't.~:--~_- j---L - . . l - L--
. ____ _~ _~c~rtai~~e.!1!__Repo~ _ n n__.. __ __ _ __ u_ _ ~ _ ~_ _ __..: __ ._.L
__ _ _;_ ~p:~~ep:~~~~o~:anc~. -- - L -l--.- ' - - - ~---.---~- :~:
c Present needs and Interests U - .- ! ---,- : . 4126
-- a'-Future needs & interests. . 1 _ . -- ~ -- un; -4/26
-_ e .A_'_s.ce~a. i.nme_nt Report __ - + 50
2 --NegotiatiOns Draft Ordinance -. -- --- - - ~~---~:::::':.:' +- :-._-n..~ n:- ;.
a. Draft Ordinance I ,
b. UACAcceptance of DraftOr~lnance : .---_~-__:::. -~j-. -- -+--- --- . i ~
c. City Acceptance of Draft Ordinance _ __ n ~. _ ' . .. _. --- 1- . --0 - - u. ,
d.:oeliv~r Dr~~ Ordln;ince-to-9p~rator _ _ _ __~ __ u, -:_ -.: -~_ I. - -, -.- -- +
~
+---~- -
-~- +-
-, -
I
__ -1--- ___ _.1-_ _____u
\ l
-- --I 1---
1 - -- ----
7/2 "
8/13 ~.: :- --
8/2.~ ~'
-8122.'
- t--
__ _1 _
n_ t- --- -;-
I .
+ -- --t
-I
I
-,.
II:...Sce~.. Z_lIgotlatlo... (!h!'!roposal)_ ._ __ _ _. ,. __ __
_un ~_~...~~hl.e Ordi_nlDc,! ~tlatlon.
1. Partnership ~~!rfl~!1ts __
2. Network.~uireme~ts
3. Cost ~eguiremen.ts _
4. Schedul~ Requir~ments
5. Final Ordinance
- - - - - -
B. Fruchl.e OnIHuce Adoption
- -- -- -- 1. up{ Acceptance of Franchise 0 rdinance
- - - - - -~-
.. _? Pub~c _Hearing. ~ffraiichise Ordinance __.
. 3. Franchise Ordinance Codifyi~g
4.1st reading Ordin~ceto Council.
5. 2nd readi.!1g ~d O!d~nan~e ,Ad9ption
-- t---- -----
-;---- - t
_____.-1 - - ---r--
_m ___._u.__._ __un. -.- .-: 5/23-- ,-
.; - --'. -- -.--.--.--- + -- ---i-- 5/23
mr' ._._m__:__ .j-__u ~5/23 .~
- - ,----u_ - - -- - +- -. --- t _u_ I -- -. -1'5/23 - -I -
- -- ... -- -- -- -t-
- 1
-.,
10/8 .
10/16 .
10/17
11{6.~:'
:- . . ,-. ... . - -. ~}/20'J@ .
l_ I ,
- -- - .~. 5/23 ~__~~;.~..~~M'~oo."'~~m.~'.~~+~~ ".-,,-~.~~,...~.~:~~;::
I
--t- -_.
.t -- .-+ --
.-.- .--j---
I
-- m~ :--:_:~.'. 9/3r __.:_~-_ - :-1
J.__ __ .; ___-+- -- -- :_ .:---_
--- - - --r -- --- --4--
+-----1-.
m_ t-.u.
,
- ---I.
-I
- -- - - 1-
+----
-t ----t- -~---- -----j----
. . -,
- 1-
. - -- -+ -- - ---1
uj _
--j
,
T
t -- -- .. -- -
--- - - - - - - -- --
I!I.. OtIler Sceullo IIgotlatl~.. (Thl. PfOP..O'a1l .
A. (o1l.ortI.. PutHer Develop.llIt
-1
CATY/SceHrfo 2' 01_ SceurIo IegalIaIIoa
'uIl
~ '. ,-, ~"".. ,,~, . ........ @
Metropoltlan Communications ConslAtants
Confidential and Proprietary
.
,
.
'Ilk
4/01
5/01
6/01
7/01
8/01
9/01
10/01
11/01
12/01
1{02
_IV. PI~otProl~~ _ _ __
I
- __ ul --
l__ ___
I
1 --- - -
I
- - --, ------
- ---~~- -- ~--
__ __ _ ~ !Uot_ ~~D~IiOD , Deslp
1. Demonstration Goals
-- --- --i users~ P-roviders and Services----- - -----------
________ __ ___ _H__ n----------r ---
3. Rber Design & Bid Documents __________~- __
4. E9uf~ent DeSign & Purc.~~J50~ments _ _ _ m -1----
_5.Pr~B~d_~os!~~t~mate___ ___m______ ____ ---1-
_ ..6._C~y FJ!1a.!lcing !-dvisol)' S_~ice:>_ __ __ _
_ 7: City ~c~ep!<i.n~__ _n__ _ _ n_
B. Sollcl~aliOD aDd Awards (~~ 1!I~lacl~cI)
1. Advertize for Fiber Bids
-- -- -
2. Open Fiber Bids
3. Evaluate & Recommend Fiber-Award
- --- - -
4. City Financing in Place
5 UAC ACcepfance -
6 Council_Acceptance
, - ~ - -ni 8/15 _. -t -- U_ -- -I'm --
-- - 1- -- _n -- -; - -- -- --,- - 8/22 r- - -- --T- -- U
--=__ --1- - .__. ~_--, m .~.__.~~.~8o. ] ___/!~ .. ~. . .
'; : --L-- 9::::~m
- ---;--- - - ~- ~_-__ ~__:_~ --~~_~_-~~- __, __ _ - -10/8 5- _~_: .
10/16 . ,
-- --+ - - ----
U t-
-,-- ---- -- - -j -
,
--+- --
~
_n_ _+
.. -t
-+
- t- --- --- -----t - ----
--~~______ ____ ~--- ____ --f -- ----
I '
-- T -- -- ------ i----- - __u__-+-_ - --- - -
~_~~______ _.L.-____ _ __-1______
, I :
i- - -----t-----
_ 1_ _ _ ____nl_ ---
; ! !
.,. --------+-- - - -------l-------
,
~ --- -
---t- -- ---- --r-
, --
_ C. Fiber CoDltructloa , Eq.II.ia.nt ~nstallltlOl -
1. Fiber Notice to Proceed & Equip Order
- 2. Fiber Construction - - - - - - - -
_ 3._FI~erTesting _~ _ mu_
__ nm~_Re~eiveEquiem_e,~~_ _ ___u_
5. Equipment Installation
~=-=~_6~ EquipmentT ~t;~g,~~{etW?rk St<0~~-=-=-_-_ ~~n
7. UAC AcceP!ar1ce__ ____ _ _____ ____ ____ __ _ ____
8. Council Acceptance
--j
-I
_n _ !__
~-
_ ______1
10/19 .
10/19
- ----- ------ - - - -1-- ------ - '1'------ - ~
I
- - ---r---------.-.---~-
,
_ _ ____J __ __-_~_....: ______ _ ___~-_
I ,
I
- __~_..... __ - ____ - _J__ ___ ~_
11/30
11/30 ;-
-j ___n_ -- 1 u -- - ---:-- -------12/7
- --r----- --;-12/21- --1-, - -----
_u~__:-~~:- -- -~; - ______~-:~ _-~~~- :~":~-~=--~~1/~~ -_~~
--- -t
I
- --- --- -- ----
Pilat ProJed
..........1Ile ad ScHdllIe
rid
......... @
Metropolitan CommunicallOns Consultants
Confidential and Proprietary