Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
728 Caroline Street
728 Caroline Street CUP 10-01 Filing Fee: *$350.00 "PORTANGELES *Admin. $120.00 FA►� WASHINGTON, U. S. A. �c� CITY OF PORT ANGELES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge. In most cases you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not apply"(N/A). Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning,.shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems please ask the City Planning Division employees to assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project: .4 cc e55#Z,r A. Address or general location of site: 779'2� C I GLrO � re- 2. Name, address, and phone number of applicant: Ge-,_0 M + 4C_ `f9 ao A asLA mo vac-Li LnNC /A A i-ZL7t E'o WA q B a--7 5. '4-1-5--35E-07S-9 3. Namq, address and phone numbe?of contact person if other than dpplicant: N/A 4. Date checklist prepared: 9 '7/90 1 Q 5. Agency requesting checklist: CITY OF PORT ANGELES 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): W JI.r A. What is the long term /objective of this proposal? vl eLJCAOP e�� B. How doers this project relate to long-term/plans? �ce-e55-a res -e,—:h, �,,.�� a �—o^ r�MO vctil c �,•�c: 5�; i�^�wG�V.r� . /Vl a1 /ae.� alc.,i � ��.� �? 4 wi11 Le � P Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 2 AGENCY USE 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about thaf has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: /VorvLE-7 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Nv 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) WE- PL,A.N-� -r4> /3+_7-_er D A ST(2_,_A_cT L.-2.c5- w x m k A CA AA /-A&=— P-Lco A_ ASD APPaox_T_�1ci C _-r 9e)o IP o� Aw�tr��,NG. 5P/J� ©mss p� o��t-1 TNS ki5T3✓�G. 5T2L.-C7- x•. Q"-ZLt a✓•r 19-1.0, m4 c- ntEw ST�z�,��-c��� t..sT y, 13��" �5�� Fj1Z_ 2C-saDCi-i!TQL. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. r�ll 02-7 CA/LCJ L� 1 i t ) l -D(2-T Ai 6.C_LC5 J L CC-4 L : jZ Lo T" 3 Lf:-AC r-AS-r f3 L 3C PROJECT SPECIFIC ACTIONS: Complete this section if your proposal involves a project specific action such as a subdivision, new construction, a new or expanding business, a site specific rezone(not area- wide), a conditional use permit, a shoreline permit, or similar action: ENVIRONMENT 1. Earth A. General description of the site(circle one): Flat, rollin , hilly, steep slo es, mountainous, other ° L-nT Sia Pc-D B. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? lI `�v -7.1 FT/-7P- FT) Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 3 AGENCY USE C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. CC,�i l S� v�+lJ`t w✓s✓� D. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. /\J L) E. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill o r, — 5;i C- L Lrvc2.s.. rJG- /4"D 7L a1zA C=tirC- - 6F -ri-4 C Sr—k6- F. Ti F. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Np T Li KEL`j G. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? H. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: l Lr'R2ACTl�.JG, Q. 1Z/ZT LY�-5 bt.�/Lr�c. Cc��vsil'Zc-�c t�u .� �.✓ZC��-n�0 �V L`P'L VL���,C.r 1 rQ 1 S U✓�l a0(-'T�G 2. Air A. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. 1zcSiDCvjIiZL CoNST04. G 1 0vJ ..ZmPAG1 S Di..IL�✓�1C� eo✓-SL2v`C iUng Nv✓L n- o L-- nC5iCCt-TM41xL E/,,v--c 5 550 S A PTCa✓,J 5T&i�G(Z 0j J B. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. /V U C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Aj 0/1J 3. Water A. Surface: i.) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Nv ii.) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. /1J O iii.) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material: /\J U ^J Lf- iv.) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. ry 0 Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 4 AGENCY USE v.) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. N vi.) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. /V 0 B. Ground: i.) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N v ii.) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing chemicals; agricultural wastes; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Cr^JAJ6-C( 5��..,L�rZ 5`r 5 i�✓� C. Water Runoff(including storm water): i.) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will the water flow into other waters? If so, describe. =TLS ii.) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. JOJU D. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: /-,v✓..3 C- 4. Plants A. Check or circle the type of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other x_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs —_grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation B. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? C. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. TR-=S w7 LL- /36- /ZC PL,q /3 0,-JC S r- T�� c�,� f �.`C T �,N - Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 5 AGENCY USE 5. Animals A. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other 5"e-u-L-5 SoNc a--r/z Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other AA c� o ti Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ti o"L— B. Threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Nv D. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. /,J O+J E 6. Energy and Natural Resources A. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. EL_EC Fa_ �-- E/LG Y_ �_L�c T 2.Z C. A,.s D L.z o 00 Cx pa s c ,_A-6" B. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. �,J 0 C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. T"5 uLA l,17vJ-3 C_>,F S[/ZLA_C tf�-t- 7. Environmental Health A. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. i) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N c}r.J L�,_ ii) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. N'0 B. Noise i) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? /vor rc-. ^-)0 S6 -s ✓ ii) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Ga N 57-2,_,c t o),J N o s:SL`— A P✓'l u PC E 0Ltz-tv-J6— cJNS-riL( -� (-O .J P14AS4ff— iii) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Li✓A="I koLd .-2S Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 6 AGENCY USE 8. Land and Shoreline Use A. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 12E5 x D tv 1 A L- B. B. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Nv C. Describe any structures on the site. Ig30 ��C-LC FA,` L-T_ R0--1C, �.��A su>✓o D. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? E. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 12-5 ` 7 F. What is the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the site? (,.A-6-./J G. What is the current Shoreline Master Program designation of the site? N 1A H. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? If so, specify. /%J O I. How many people would reside or work in the completed project? J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? �,J O nJ L_ K. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: /Q/iA L Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: LIM LL_ /%1C-C--- 6606- Fo 2 A �C�S 1©1"'Yv lT✓V� �� 9. Housing A. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. B. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. C3✓�f 1� — Low/r�1.�UnL� �",�l"�ov�-L� C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. 10. Aesthetics A. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? yZ.65 3®cW 1 3 A L- l JV /Q N D A Q 0 (=PJ G-, Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 7 AGENCY USE B. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? S�vEn�L Ex�ST=�� f�rsOCES L.-,ou.r-D V=. C. � an .Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if p p Y IZL-T,oS tir 0-6-5 X-C) �wTS✓a t� �q�5?N�i G S 11. Light and Glare A. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? ocy,--)T s/-\L --s-�I4TT✓-,SG_ B. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N O V'J Lf- D. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. 12. Recreation A. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? C.3=- B. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. N O v'Jt15- 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation A. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe: /�J v B. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N 0KJCL C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: /-%J v wi 14. Transportation A. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. B. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? w-`l I.l�.✓tet �02 /''1..�-L E Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 8 AGENCY USE C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? -ZD i GA/�QCw bdv 6,.,TS=D6 44RPUZ 1 tXAA AJATEf D. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate ether public or private). N O E. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Ili 0 F. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. S=w-C-L-r J='o^A--I L.Y ti--5,.4 6-C G. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. /v a V 15. Public Services A. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NC5 --54 A S EX2s 136- B. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities _ Circle utifti s currently available at the sit electrici , natural ga , Ovate efus servi , telephone sanitary sewer eptic syste , other. C:A(3-L-c- -rz--L 0-/. Szrcw^/ B. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. .5-04 MC- A 17. Economics A. If the proposal will result in expansion of an existing business, please describe the nature of the expansion: (e.g., additional land and/or buildings, new equipment, new employees). 1V 1A B. If the proposal is the creation of a new business, please describe (e.g., re-use of an existing building and site, construction of a new building). /V 1A --/z6-s i0cw2 S4 L- C. Describe if the proposal is the first of its type in the community, or what the similar uses are. D. How many people will the proposal provide employment for at its completion and what types of jobs will be created (e.g., sales clerks, factory workers, etc.)?(Jobs created by the construction of the proposal should be reported separately.) /\J <0 L� Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 9 AGENCY USE E. Where will the materials, goods or services utilized by the proposal come from? N ,y l F. Where will the goods or services produced by the proposal be utilized? G. Who will utilize the goods or services produced by the proposal? H. Will the proposal alter the tax assessments of the area? y�s — JQ694f-.a56- VALL-E- ar- 5 6- 15 ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (ESA) INFORMATION A. LISTED SPECIES If ESA listed species (salmon,trout, and chars, e.g. bull trout)are present or ever were present in the watershed where your project will be located, your project has the potential for affecting them, and you need to comply with the ESA. The questions in this section will help determine if the ESA listings will impact your project. Are ESA listed salmonids currently present in the watershed in which your project will be: Yes X No Has there ever been an ESA listed salmonid stock present in this watershed: Yes X No Uncertain Please describe Puget Sound Chinook Salmon. Strait of Juan de Fuca summer chum salmon, and bull trout are listed as threatened species in the Elwha River, Morse Creek, and the Strait of Juan de Fuca including Port Angeles Harbor. [If you answered"yes"to either of the above questions, you should complete the remainder of this section. If not, skip to Non Project Action Section Page 13] 1. Name of watershed Port Angeles Regional Watershed (Elwha Morse). 2. Name of nearest waterbody STaA-r oF. ZIL.A^j P P"Z A 3. What is the distance from this project to the nearest body of water? (Often a buffer between the project and a stream can reduce the chance of a negative impact to fish.) 4. What is the current land use between the project and the potentially affected water body (parking lot, farmland, etc ? q � 52Scs7'`r P��s- DLz - l 21C. 5. Is the project above a: ( ) natural permanent barrier(waterfall) natural temporary barrier(beaver pond); man made barrier(culvert, dam); ( ) other(explain) 6. If you checked any of the items listed in the above question#5, are there any resident salmonid populations above the blockage?Yes No Don't know N JA 7. What percent of the project will be impervious surface(including pavement and roof area)? �v `5v B. FISH MIGRATION: The following questions will help determine if this project could interfere with migration of adult and juvenile fish. (Both increases and decreases to water flow can affect fish migration.) Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 10 AGENCY USE 1. Does the project require the withdrawal of: Surface water? N0 Name of surface water body Ground water? /Jo Amount From where? W� Depth of well 2. Will any water be rerouted? N O 3. Will there be retention ponds? /'J O If yes, will this be an infiltration pond or a surface discharge to either a municipal storm water system or a surface water body? Ili 1A If a surface water discharge, name of waterbody N/x� 4. Will new roads be required? N D (Increased road mileage may affect the timing of water reaching a stream and may impact fish habitat.) 5. Are culverts proposed as part of the project? N v 6. Will topography changes affect the duration/direction of runoff flows? If yes, describe: NC) 7. Will the project involve any reduction of the floodway or floodplain by filling or other partial blockage of flows? N2 Q If yes, how will the loss of flood storage be mitigated by your project? C. WATER QUALITY. 1. Do you know of any problems with water quality in any of the streams within this watershed? If so, describe /'Jv 2. Will your project reduce or increase shade along or over a waterbody? By O /J L?'CA/a I% ()AJ 3. Will the project increase nutrient loading or have the potential to increase nutrient loading or contaminants(fertilizers, other waste discharges, or runoff)to the waterbody? NU 4. Will turbidity be increased because of the project activities? /'J C) 5. Will your project require long term maintenance, i.e., bridge cleaning, highway salting, chemical sprays for vegetation management, clearing of parking lots? Nv Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 11 AGENCY USE D. VEGETATION 1. Will the project involve the removal of any vegetation from stream banks? /110 2. If any vegetation is removed, do you plan to replant? N/,A NON-PROJECT SPECIFIC ACTIONS: Complete this section only if your proposal involves a non-project specific action such as a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning Code Amendment, area-wide rezone (City-wide or large sub-area), specific rezone, or other similar action: When answering these questions be aware of to what extent the proposal or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study)for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness,wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreland and land use impacts: Environmental Checklist EVALUATION FOR Page 12 AGENCY USE 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s): 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. I,the undersigned,state that to the best of my knowledge,the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. SIGNED:-)S� la-116e�� DATE' ��/� PHONE: LP S -35-1- 67�� Drive ji'Drive15 X 10 .:* (10 FT y'. Setback) 12 Foot ARU Setback 30 X 29 + 15X6 UTILITY ESNT 8 Foot 10 FT t,. Setback X40 Feel .:.x� .i Demolish ,�as r`,r' �y � • [7v � Existing 0 House " V. �f a� 1$r , Ii t77 r; s . sCiCG�TJ� fe t 47. * - 720 Caroline Street .. :4•_ �: :• .� ..EY Phase 1 Site Plan CITY OF PORT AWAUS +*f CUSTOMER RECEIPT M Oper: SCORDERY Type: CT Drawer: 1 Date: 2/23/10 23 Receipt no: 21384 Descripi®n Quantity Amount PZ 2200 PLANNIN6 9 ZON1N6 1.00 f 151D.00 Trans number: 1933665 BAUER, GERALD MER, SLRALD PZ D3 ARU IN FHE RS-7 Tender detail CK CHECK 2224 $750.00 Total tendered M&M Total payment $750.00 Trans date: 2/23/10 Time: 15:52:24 ete THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT *** FOR INQUIRIES 360-457-0411 PRESS ZL.RO ".CITYOFPA.US Y<3� LES OR , NGE", � � �►�►. WASH 1 IN GTO N, U. S. A. ' Community & Economic Development Department 451 I Aril 21,2010 M A Mr. and Mrs. Gerald Bauer - 4920A Island View Drive x ,F 'Mukilteo, WA 98275 Y-ZZ 1,41 do , w, ' RE Conditional Use Permit—CUP-10-02 r, Bauer.—728 Caroline Street Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bauer: As you know, following a public hearing conducted.on April 14, 2010,the City's Planning Commission approved a conditional use:permit(CUP)to allow an accessory residential unit to be ' ..Placed in the RS-7 zone at 729 Caroline Street. The CUP is approved with the following conditions: Conditions: 1. Addressing for each dwelling.unit shall be clearly identified as.728 and.728%East i Caroline Street. Address numbers must be at least six(6)inches in height and readily visible from the street and of contrasting color from their background. { 2. Two(2)off-street parking spaces are required for each residential dwelling unit for a total . " of four(4) spaces. x 3. .Driveway and site access shall be constructed to Public Works and Utilities Standards. v 4. All utility improvements including water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage and electrical are to be completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works and Utilities Department. Separate water and electrical meters are-required for each dwelling unit. 5. The phasing plan,as approved shall be followed throughout the site redevelopment r process or the conditional use permit maybe invalidated. The use for which a CUP is approved must be commenced within one-year from the date'of , issuanceor the approval will be invalid. If you have any questions regarding either the conditions of approval, or the building permit process,_please don't hesitate to contact Community& " Economic Development staff: t r Sincerely, /�.Sue Roberds x 1 Planning Manager X .a Cc: Building Division Public Works and Utilities . r �fi�Y Phone: 360-417-4750/Fax: 360-417=4711 5 Website: www.cityofpa.us/Email: smartgrowth@cityofpa.us 321 East Fifth Street- P.O. Boz 1150/Port Angeles, WA 98362-0217 Planning Commission Minutes April 14,2010 Page 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT—CUP 10-02—BAUER, 728 Caroline Street: Request to allow an accessory residential unit(ARU) in the RS-7 zone. (Continued from March 24, 2010.) Associate Planner Scott Johns reviewed the staff report recommending approval of the accessory residential unit with conditions. Mr. Johns responded to Commissioner Bruch that there are other,two story structures in the neighborhood as well as a couple of three story buildings. She asked if any comments were received from neighbors. Planning Manager Roberds responded that Mr. T.A. Burton, an immediate neighbor, provided testimony at the March 24 meeting in support of the proposal. That letter is included in the file and is referenced in the meeting minutes. Commissioners asked for clarification regarding the planned development process. Planner Johns noted that the proposal is a little tricky in that the existing residence is quite small and the accessory residential unit cannot be larger than 50% the size of the primary residence. Since the intent is to demolish the existing primary residence, during construction of the ARU, at some point, the primary will be demolished so the ARU will become the only unit on the site. Following demolition of the primary structure, the ARU will be completed and (likely) a new primary structure will be begun that will take precedent size wise over the ARU. If a new primary is never built, the ARU will simply remain as the only residence on the site. However, the intent is to end up with two residential units that meet the required construction/site coverage ratios for structures in the RS-7 Residential Single Family zone. There being no further questions, Chair Matthews opened discussion to the public. Juanita Bauer, 4920 Island View Drive, Mukilteo, WA,thanked the Planning Commission for its consideration of the matter. She and her husband have owned the property for many years and the property redevelopment is one they have been planning for quite awhile. They plan to return to Port Angeles in their retirement and live on the site. There being no further comments, Chair Matthews closed the public hearing. Following brief discussion regarding the intricacies of the site development such that in any scenario development standards are met, Commissioner Reiss moved to approve the conditional use permit with the following conditions, citing the following findings and conclusions in support of that action: Conditions: 1. Addressing for each dwelling unit shall be clearly identified as 728 and 728'/2 East Caroline Street. Address numbers must be at least six (6) inches in height and readily visible from the street and of contrasting color from their background. 2. Two (2) off-street parking spaces are required for each residential dwelling unit for a total of four(4)spaces. 3. Driveway and site access shall be constructed to Public Works and Utilities Standards. 4. All utility improvements including water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage and electrical Planning Commission Minutes April 14,2010 Page 3 are to be completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works and Utilities Department. Separate water and electrical meters are required for each dwelling unit. 5. The phasing plan as approved shall be followed throughout the site redevelopment process or the conditional use permit may be invalidated. Findings: Based on the information provided in the Community and Economic Development Staff Report for CUP 10-01 dated April 14, 2010, including all information in the public record file, comments and testimony presented during the public hearing, the Planning Commission discussion and deliberation, and the above listed conditions of approval,the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that: 1. Gerald and Juanita Bauer submitted a Conditional Use Permit application for an accessory residential unit on February 23, 2010. The applicant owns the subject property. 2. The proposed site is legally described as Lot 3, Block 36 of the Norman R. Smith Subdivision of Port Angeles, WA, and is located at 728 E. Caroline Street. 3. The site is zoned Residential Single Family(RS-7) and is 7,000 sq. ft. in area. PAMC 17.10 contains bulk and dimensional standards for residential structures and accessory structures. No extenuating circumstances exist on the site that would warrant any modification to the standards listed in PAMC 17.10. 4. The City's Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Low Density Residential. Adjacent designations are also Low Density Residential. The site is located in the City's North Central Planning Area. The subject site is located on the south side of East Caroline Street and east of Francis Street. Development in the neighborhood includes predominately single family residential uses. 5. The City's Comprehensive Plan goals and policies were reviewed for consistency with the proposal. Land Use Element Goal A and Policy A.2 and C2, Housing Element A.6 and B.6, and Transportation Element Policy B.14 where found to be specific to the proposal and are listed as Attachment B to the April 14, 2010, staff report. 6. Per 17.96.050 PAMC, the Planning Commission shall consider applications for conditional use permits as specified in the applicable Chapter of the Zoning Regulations. The Planning Commission may grant said permits which are consistent and compatible with the purpose of the zone in which the use is located, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and not contrary to the public use and interest. In each application the Planning Commission may impose whatever restrictions or conditions are considered essential to protect the public health, safety, welfare, and to prevent depreciation of neighboring property. Conditional uses shall be evaluated to determine if the characteristics of the intended use as related to the specific proposed site would defeat the purpose of the City's Zoning Regulations by introducing incompatible, detrimental, or hazardous conditions. The Planning Commission may refuse to issue a conditional use permit if the characteristics of the intended use would defeat the purpose of the City's zoning regulations. A development that is approved through the conditional use permit process must remain in continual compliance with specific conditions of approval or may be revoked. 0 • Planning Commission Minutes April 14,2010 Page 4 7. . The ARU is proposed to be located above a garage. Garage space that is attached to a residential structure shall meet required residential setbacks from all property lines. 8. An ARU may be no larger than 50%the size of the primary residence in the RS-7 zone. As proposed, the ARU will be 36.6%the size of the proposed new primary structure. 9. Site access must comply with Public Works and Utilities Standards that are contained in the Urban Services Standards & Guidelines Manual. 10. Notification of the conditional use permit application was placed in the Peninsula Daily News on March 3, 2010. Public notice was mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property on March 1, 2010. The site was posted on March 1, 2010. One written comment supporting the project was received within the public notice period. 11. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the proposed action on April 14, 2010. 12. The Planning Commission opened a public hearing on the proposal at the March 24, 2010, regular Planning Commission meeting and continued the action to the April 14, 2010 regular meeting. An immediate neighbor, T. A. Burton, provided comment at the March 24 public hearing in favor of the proposal. Conclusions: Based on information provided in the Department of Community and Economic Development Staff Report for CUP 10-01 dated April 14, 2010, including all of the information in the public record file, comments, and testimony presented during the public hearing, the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed conditions of approval and listed findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby concludes that: 1. As conditioned,the proposal is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. As conditioned the proposal is consistent with requirements for approval of a conditional use permit as specified in PAMC 17.96.050, and with the requirement of a conditional use permit for an accessory residential unit in the RS-7 per PAMC 17.10.040(A) 3. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with PAMC Chapter 14.40 (Parking Ordinance). 4. The use is in the public interest as it allows for a variety of housing opportunities within the city. 5. The City's responsibility under the State Environmental Policy Act in review of the proposal has been satisfied. Commissioner Caudill seconded the motion that passed 6—0. OR NIG E L_� S P WASH I N GTO N, U. S. A. Fig 040W DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY& ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott K. Johns AICP DATE: April 14, 2010 RE: Conditional Use Permit- CUP 10-01 APPLICANT: Gerald M. & Juanita Bauer OWNER: Same LOCATION: 728 Caroline Street REQUEST: Accessory Residential Unit in an RS-7 Residential Single Family zone RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission approve CUP 10-01 with 6 conditions, citing 12 findings and 5 conclusions in support of that action as listed in Attachment A to this staff report. EXISTING CONDITIONS IN AREA The subject property is located on Caroline Street between Francis Street Park and Eunice Street. Nearby lots located on the south side of Caroline Street are uniform in size and dimension for the RS- 7 zone, while lots on the north side of Caroline are reduced in size by the presence of the marine bluff and city owned right-of-way that contains the Waterfront Trail. Structures in the surrounding area are typically singe family with the exception of a multi-family apartment structure located at Front and Eunice Streets. A conditionally approved day-acre facility is located at the corner of Eunice and Georgiana Street, approximately 300 feet west of the subject site. The subject site measures 140' in depth by 50' in width and is approximately 7,000 square feet in area. No environmentally sensitive areas exist on the site. The primary site access is from Caroline Street, which is an improved local access street that terminates above the Frances Street Park. Access is also provided through the Caroline/Georgiana alley. The site slopes downward from the north (front)to the south and is currently developed with a single family residence. The application and site maps are attached as Attachment C. The RS-7 zone is primarily a single family residential zone. Accessory residential units are allowable as a conditional use in RS-7 Zones. The zoning transitions south of the Georgiana/Front Street Alley, from RS-7 to Commercial Arterial, and to the north and east to Public Buildings and Parks. AGENCY COMMENTS City Departments reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: The Fire Department: had no objections or comments. Conditional Use Permit CUP 10-0 fauer • April 14,2010 Page 2 The Public Works and Utilities Department 1. Four(4) off street parking spaces will be required. 2. Separate electric meters are required for each unit. 3. The existing driveway from Caroline Street shall be removed and a full height curb restored or reconstructed. Any new driveway must be located to meet the required 7.5 foot side yard setback,per the City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines. 4. A sidewalk shall be constructed to City standards along the full lot frontage. The Building Division of DCED 1. A building permit is required for the construction. Construction will be per IRC requirements. PUBLIC COMMENT Notification of the proposed action was placed in the Peninsula Daily News on March 3, 2010, posted on the site on March 1, 2010, and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property on March 1, 2010. No comments were received during the public comment period for the proposal that ended March 18, 2010. Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan establishes the long range goals and policies of the City. Any project proposed in the City must be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map identifies the site as being in the North Central Planning Area and designates the site as being Low Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan's policies have been reviewed with regard to the proposed application and the policies identified in Attachment B to this staff report are found to be the most relevant to the proposal. Single family and multi-family residences are legitimate components of district development. The proposal would allow for a density that is in compliance with low density residential areas. Zoning Ordinance The Zoning Ordinance is the primary implementing ordinance for the Comprehensive Plan. It establishes what types of uses are permitted in specific zones, definitions of uses, and minimum design standards for such uses. Like the Comprehensive Plan, any project proposed in the City must be consistent with the regulations of the zone in which it is located. The Zoning Map identifies the subject property and surrounding properties as RS-7 Residential Single Family. Specific sections applicable to accessory residential development in the RS-7 are listed below for reference. Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) Section 17.10.010 states the purpose of the RS-7 Zone as "a low density residential zone intended to create and preserve urban single family residential neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family homes on standard Townsite-size lots. Uses which are compatible with and functionally related to a single family residential environment may also be located in this zone..." Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) Section 17.08.040(A) establishes that accessory residential units are permitted in the RS-7 zone by conditional use permit. PAMC Section 17.08.010(B) defines an Accessory Residential Unit as "a dwelling unit which is incidental to a detached single family residence, is subordinate in space (i.e., fifty percent or less Conditional Use Permit CUP 10-01auer • April 14,2010 Page 3 space than the single family residential use), and is located on the same zoning lot as the single family residence. An accessory residential unit is served by water and electrical service that is separate from the primary residential service and has a separate address." PAMC Section 17.08.025(J) defines a dwelling unit as "one or more rooms which are arranged, designed, or used as living quarters for one family only. Individual bathrooms are not necessarily provided, but complete single kitchen facilities,permanently installed, shall always be included for each dwelling unit." STAFF ANALYSIS Per PAMC 17.11.040(A), an accessory residential unit(ARU) requires a conditional use permit when proposed in a residential single family zone. An ARU may be no larger than 50%the size of the primary unit. In this case, the applicant intends to construct the ARU/garage combination structure prior to demolition of the existing primary residential unit, followed by reconstruction of a new primary structure. The proposed ARU will not be finished or occupied prior to the existing residential structure being removed. There is nothing about the site that is unusual that would prevent the proposed construction/reconstruction from being in compliance with the Port Angeles Municipal Code. Because the project is proposed as being phased, careful review is necessary to ensure that the new primary residential structure and the ARU will not exceed the maximum 30% lot coverage and that site build-out will meet the requirement of the ARU being no more than 50%the area of the primary structure. RS-7 Development Standards Comparison RS-7 Zone Required Existing Proposed Lot area 7,000 sq. ft. 7,000 sq. ft. No change Lot width 50' Minimum 50' No change Setbacks - Front/Rear 20' F/20' R Minimum 10' F/92' R 21' F/21' R Side Setbacks T Minimum —02'/ 15' 13'/7' Lot Coverage 30% Maximum=2,100 sf 16% 29% Site Coverage 50%Maximum= 3,500 sf 1,116 sf = 16% 2,946 sf=42% As indicated in the table above, proposed setbacks and lot coverage conform to current regulations. The applicant is proposing a phased approach to the redevelopment of the site. The first phase would be construction of a garage with a second story. The first floor would occupy 960 square feet of area and the second story would initially be left uncompleted and used for storage. Plumbing would be stubbed into the second floor in anticipation of completion of the second floor area as an accessory residential unit. Phase II of the project would be to demolish the existing single family structure and complete the interior finish of the proposed ARU. At this point, the new structure with a residential unit on the second floor would become the only residential structure on the site. Phase III would be to construct a new primary residential unit that would meet the bulk and dimensional standards of the zoning code. At this point, the residential unit completed in phase 11 would become the accessory residential unit. Conditional Use Permit CUP 10-01Bauer • April 14,2010 Page 4 Per PAMC 17.10.050(C), a parcel in the RS-7 zone may contain no more than 50% impervious surfaces including buildings and pavement. The proposal as indicated on the site plan will not exceed 50% site coverage. Final approval of building plans will ensure compliance with site and lot coverage requirements. The phasing of the project will also be monitored and controlled through the approval and issuance of building permits and the inspection process. The phasing as proposed will allow the shell of the ARU structure to be constructed but not occupied or finaled as a residential structure until after demolition of the existing residence. The proposed ARU is designed to be a second story over a ground floor garage. The ground floor would contain a laundry and bathroom that would occupy approximately 77 square feet of area. Both proposed structures are intended for residential occupancy and therefore must meet residential setbacks of 20 feet from the front and rear property lines and 7 feet from both side yard property lines. Site plans submitted indicate that the required setbacks will be met. Separate utility connections for both water and electricity are required per the Port Angeles Urban Services Standards and Guidelines manual. PAMC 14.40.060(D) requires 2 off-street parking spaces for each residential unit for a total of 4 off- street parking spaces. The site will be required to be developed in compliance with this requirement. The site plan is showing one parking space will be located in front of the proposed primary structure and an area large enough to park two vehicles at the rear of the proposed garage. The proposed garage will include two parking stalls. The proposal is consistent with relevant sections of the Port Angeles Municipal Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Building Statistics Current Proposed Primary Single Family Residence 1,033 sf to be 1,070 sf Footprint demolished Proposed ARU Building NA 960 sf Footprint Primary Residence Living Space 750 sq. ft. 2,365 sf(3-story) ARU Living Space NA 867 sf Living Space Ratio Primary to NA 36.6% Accessory as proposed STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE A Determination of Non-Significance was issued by the City's Responsible Official on March 19, 2010, with regard to the proposal. This satisfies the City's responsibility under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). Attachments: A-Conditions,Findings,and Conclusions B-Zoning Ordinance,Comprehensive Plan,and Other Municipal Code References C—Application,site plan, floor plans,and map Conditional Use Permit CUP 10-O4tuer April 14,2010 Page 5 ATTACHMENT A CONDITIONS, FINDINGS,AND CONCLUSIONS IN SUPPORT OF CUP 10-01 Conditions: 1. Addressing for each dwelling unit shall be clearly identified as 728 and 728'/2 East Caroline Street. Address numbers must be at least six (6) inches in height and readily visible from the street and of contrasting color from their background. 2. Two (2) off-street parking spaces are required for each residential dwelling unit for a total of four(4) spaces. 3. Driveway and site access shall be constructed to Public Works and Utilities Standards. 4. All utility improvements including water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage and electrical are to be completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works and Utilities Department. Separate water and electrical meters are required for each dwelling unit. q g 5. The phasing plan as approved shall be followed throughout the site redevelopment process or the conditional use permit may be invalidated. Findings: Based on the information provided in the Community and Economic Development Staff Report for CUP 10-01 dated April 14, 2010, including all information in the public record file, comments and testimony presented during the public hearing, the Planning Commission discussion and deliberation, and the above listed conditions of approval, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby finds that: 1. Gerald and Juanita Bauer submitted a Conditional Use Permit application for an accessory residential unit on February 23, 2010. The applicant owns the subject property. 2. The proposed site is legally described as Lot 3, Block 36 of the Norman R. Smith Subdivision of Port Angeles, WA, and is located at 728 E. Caroline Street. 3. The site is zoned Residential Single Family(RS-7) and is 7,000 sq. ft. in area. PAMC 17.10 contains bulk and dimensional standards for residential structures and accessory structures. No extenuating circumstances exist on the site that would warrant any modification to the standards listed in PAMC 17.10. 4. The City's Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Low Density Residential. Adjacent designations are also Low Density Residential. The site is located in the City's North Central Planning Area. The subject site is located on the south side of East Caroline Street and east of Francis Street. Development in the neighborhood includes predominately single family residential uses. 5. The City's Comprehensive Plan goals and policies were reviewed for consistency with the proposal. Land Use Element Goal A and Policy A.2 and C2, Housing Element A.6 and B.6, and Transportation Element Policy B.14 where found to be specific to the proposal and are listed as Attachment B to the April 14, 2010, staff report. Conditional Use Permit CUP 10-0 Quer • April 14,2010 Page 6 6. Per 17.96.050 PAMC,the Planning Commission shall consider applications for conditional use permits as specified in the applicable Chapter of the Zoning Regulations. The Planning Commission may grant said permits which are consistent and compatible with the purpose of the zone in which the use is located, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and not contrary to the public use and interest. In each application the Planning Commission may impose whatever restrictions or conditions are considered essential to protect the public health, safety, welfare, and to prevent depreciation of neighboring property. Conditional uses shall be evaluated to determine if the characteristics of the intended use as related to the specific proposed site would defeat the purpose of the City's Zoning Regulations by introducing incompatible, detrimental, or hazardous conditions. The Planning Commission may refuse to issue a conditional use permit if the characteristics of the intended use would defeat the purpose of the City's zoning regulations. A development that is approved through the conditional use permit process must remain in continual compliance with specific conditions of approval or may be revoked. 7. Th ARU is proposed to be located above a garage. Garage space that is attached to a residential structure shall meet required residential setbacks from all property lines. 8. An ARU may be no larger than 50%the size of the primary residence in the RS-7 zone. As proposed,the ARU will be 36.6%the size of the proposed new primary structure. 9. Site access must comply with Public Works and Utilities Standards that are contained in the Urban Services Standards & Guidelines Manual. 10. Notification of the conditional use permit application was placed in the Peninsula Daily News on March 3, 2010. Public notice was mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property on March 1, 2010. The site was posted on March 1, 2010. One written comment supporting the project was received within the public notice period. 11. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the proposed action on April 14, 2010. 12. The Planning Commission opened a public hearing on the proposal at the March 24, 2010, regular Planning Commission meeting and continued the action to the April 14, 2010 regular meeting. A neighbor, T. A. Burton, provided comment at the March 24, 2010,public hearing in favor of the proposal. Conclusions: Based on the information provided in the Department of Community and Economic Development Staff Report for CUP 10-01 dated April 14, 2010, including all of the information in the public record file, comments, and testimony presented during the public hearing, the Planning Commission's discussion and deliberation, and the above listed conditions of approval and listed findings, the City of Port Angeles Planning Commission hereby concludes that: 1. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. As conditioned the proposal is consistent with requirements for approval of a conditional use permit as specified in PAMC 17.96.050, and with the requirement of a conditional use permit for an accessory residential unit in the RS-7 per PAMC 17.10.040(A) 3. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with PAMC Chapter 14.40 (Parking Ordinance). Conditional Use Permit CUP 10-01 Bauer April 14,2010 Page 7 4. The use is in the public interest as it allows for a variety of housing opportunities within the city. 5. The City's responsibility under the State Environmental Policy Act in review of the proposal has been satisfied. Conditional Use Permit CUP 10-01 Sauer • April 14,2010 Page 8 ATTACHMENT A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE INFORMATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Residential Land Use Element Policy A 2: All land use decisions and approvals made by the City Council and/or any of its appointed Commissions, Boards or Committees should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and its land use map. Goal C: To have a community of viable districts and neighborhoods with a variety of residential opportunities for personal interaction, fulfillment and enjoyment, attractive to people of all ages, characteristics and interests. Policy C 2: Residential land should be developed on the district and neighborhood concept. Although such districts may be composed primarily of residential uses of a uniform density, a healthy, viable district should be composed of residential uses of varying densities which may be augmented by subordinate and compatible uses. Single family and multi-family homes, parks and open-spaces, schools, churches, day care and residential services, home occupations, and district shopping areas are all legitimate components of district development and enhancement. A neighborhood should be primarily composed of low, medium, or high density housing. Housing Element Policy B 6: Adequate low and moderate income housing opportunities should be provided within the Port Angeles Planning Area. ZONING ORDINANCE The Zoning Ordinance is the primary implementing ordinance for the Comprehensive Plan. It establishes what types of uses are permitted and where they may be located in the City. It also establishes definitions of uses, and minimum design standards for such uses. Like the Comprehensive Plan, any project proposed in the City must be consistent with the regulations of the zone in which it is located. The Zoning Map identifies the subject property as Residential Single Family (RS-7). The purpose and intent of the RS-7 zone is as follows: "This is a low density residential zone intended to create and preserve urban single family residential neighborhoods consisting of predominantly single family homes on standard Townsite-size lots. Uses which are compatible with and functionally related to a single family residential environment may also be located in this zone" PAMC 17.96.050 (Conditional Use Permit) states that the Planning Commission may grant a conditional use permit approval which is: 1) consistent with the zone in which the proposal is located; 2) consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and 3) not contrary to the public use and interest. Appropriate conditions may be made to ensure compliance with these criteria. Denial of an application may be made should the proposed use defeat the purpose of the zone by introducing incompatible, detrimental or hazardous conditions. PANIC 17.96.050 specifies procedures for the review and processing of conditional use permit applications, as follows: Conditional Use Permit CUP 10-01suer April 14,2010 Page 9 17.96.050 Conditional Use Permit A. The Planning Commission shall consider applications for Conditional Use Permits of uses as specified in the applicable Chapter of the Zoning Regulations. The Planning Commission may grant said permits which are consistent and compatible with the purpose of the zone in which the use is located, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and not contrary to the public use and interest. The Planning Commission may refuse to issue a Conditional Use Permit if the characteristics of the intended use as related to the specific proposed site are such as would defeat the purpose of these Zoning Regulations by introducing incompatible, detrimental, or hazardous conditions. B. In each application the Planning Commission may impose whatever restrictions or conditions they consider essential to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, and to prevent depreciation of neighboring property. C. Purpose of a Conditional Use Permit: The purpose of a Conditional Use Permit shall be to assure that the maximum degree of compatibility between uses shall be attained. The purpose of these regulations shall be maintained with respect to the particular use of the particular site and in consideration of other existing and potential uses within the general area in which such use is to be located. CUP 10-01 Bauer Vicinity Map A dam Fy•. " n _N` Y v- a, Legend CUP 10-01 Bauer site i a� -- Street edge >j parcel Oa rc)I i I a 1i I J l aril lilt/Goorc lana All r„ IJJ s 4� i CUP 10-01 Bauer existing site map r Legend CUP 10-01 Bauer site m . Street edge parcel ., i v{ s ' A ° Drive A 30x21 . (21 FT Setback 13 Foot ARU Setback 30 X 32 UTILITY ESMT 7 Foot AL 10 FT Setback q. 140 Feet <: -m . �. . Demolish Existing _.. .,� House • m , m y � t r�fiJ Feet. ---7>. , a yyyy F 728 Caroline Street ` Phase 1 Site Plan EC D 1 ED APR - 7 2010 C TY OF PORT ANGELES Desi.of Community Development m Drive 30x21 (21 FT Setback 13 Foot ARU Setback 30 X 32 T, UTILITY ESMT 7 Foot 10 FT Setback -1 Foot Spacing I,1 -k 140 Feet �:� .::� " House•f' 4i x 25 X_401 i ke Drive 11 X26 (21 FT - Setback) ' Front�Fntry w � 5 X 14 50 Feet . 72.3 Caroline Street I Phase 2 Site Plar D APR - 7 2010 CITY OF PORT ANGELES Dept.of Community Development • Size,100verage and Code Compliance _ Garage/ARU, Square Footage i,,, Living Space ECHU D First Floor 77 APR Second Floor 790 7 2010 Total 867 CITY OF PORTANGELES Dept.of Community Development Ground Coverage Building 960 Drive 630 Total Coverage 1590 House(Future) ,,Square Footage Living Space Basement 655 First Floor 855 Second Floor 855 Tota l 2365 Ground Coverage Building 1070 Drive 286 Total Coverage 1356 Lot Square Feet 7000 Code Requirements Requirement Actual House/ARU SF 2X Minimum 2.73 Lot Coverage 30%SF 2100.00 2030 Site Coverage 1/2 SF 3500 2946 House Setbacks (Future) Front 20 Feet 21 Feet East Lot Line (Easement) 10 Feet 15 Feet West Lot Line 7 Feet 10 Feet Height 30 Feet 30 Feet Garage/ARU Setbacks Alley 20 Feet 21 Feet East Lot Line(Easement) 10 Feet 13 Feet West Lot Line 7 Feeti 7 Feet Height 30 Feeti 26 Feet — ------- ---Kr-2 1/22" BATH 9-4"x5-B" SL N GARAGE m 10'-4"X z4'-a a GAPA I 1� r.a I IU P LMNG AREA 77sgt D M - 7 2010R yDNGlopment ni �aATH �I BEDROOM 7 - 97-7"x14'-10" i " i - s.r .+ --- 7LOSEt r y. ci ¢ BEDROOM ( t2'-7•x9'-1• -- A i a DECK LMNG APEA 794 sq t REC D APR - 7 2010 CITY OF PORT ANGELES Dept.of Community Development I I III i o ECCE WE APR - 7 2010 CITY OF PORT ANGELES Dept.of Community Development w d,�e 1Y 1 E c E E APR - 7 2010 CITY OF PORT ANGELES Dept.of Community Development r. F 0 } { r r o K:- l i I 2010 CAN GELES Oeptunity Development ■ o E c E UE D APR - 7 2010 CITY OF PORT ANGELES Dept.of Community Development RE ( ! ilVE APR - 7 2010 CITY OF PORT ANGELES ®4t,of Community Development Planning Commission Minutes March 24,2010 Page 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT—CUP 10-01 —BAUER, 728 Caroline Street: Request to allow an accessory residential unit (ARU) in the RS-7 zone. Chair Reiss qualified Commission members. No one had any Appearance of Fairness or Conflict of Interest concerns to claim. He then opened the public hearing noting staff's memorandum that the applicant asked that the item be continued to the April 14 regular meeting. T.A. Burton, 732 Caroline, a neighbor, stated that the existing residence is of little value to the neighborhood and spoke in favor of the application and presented a letter stating same for the record. Commissioner Powers moved to continue the public hearing to April 14,2010. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Matthews and passed 6—0. ,.6 L(&4'[61'/g701 Scott Johns- RE: CUP at 728 Caroline Pagel • From: "Jerry Bauer" <2bauerg@comcast.net> To: "'Scott Johns"' <Sjohns@cityofpa.us> Date: 04/06/2010 6:18 AM Subject: RE: CUP at 728 Caroline CC: "'Sue Roberds"' <S robe rds@cityofpa.us> Dear Mr. Johns, We just returned from a week away so I apologize for not getting back to you until now. I have reduced the size of the ARU to a footprint of 960 SF and the primary structure to a footprint of 1070 SF based on findings from your review. The new plans will fit into the site and lot coverage requirements, and the primary structure will be more than twice the size of the ARU. I will revise the site plan to show this and I would need until Wednesday get that completed. We have considered the proposal that you sent(copied below), and are concerned about encumbering the title to the property with an additional agreement. We are currently considering the following phased plan: Phase 1 -Obtain a building permit for a detached garage that has a small bath/laundry area on the first floor and a second floor storage unit. Electrical and plumbing would be stubbed in to the second floor for future use as an residence. Building setbacks will meet the requirements for a residence and total lot and site coverage of the existing house and detached garage will be below the maximums. Phase 2 - Following the construction of Phase 1, obtain a demolition permit and demolish the existing single family home. Phase 3 -After completion of the demolition of Phase 2, obtain a building permit to convert the second floor storage area of the detached garage into the primary residential unit on the lot and complete the construction. Phase 4 -Apply for a conditional use permit to build a primary residence and convert the house of Phase 3 to an ARU. We would appreciate it if you would review the above and comment, after have sent the revised site plan. If the phased plan looks acceptable, we will withdraw our application and resubmit at a later date as you suggested below. Thank you. Jerry Bauer -----Original Message----- From: Scott Johns [mailto:Sjohns@cityofpa.us] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 4:59 PM To: Jerry Bauer Subject: CUP (x4/07/2010) Scott Johns ARE CIJP at 728 Caroline Page Hi Jerry, I have not heard from you for awhile. As you know, the hearing for your conditional use permit was continued to the April 14, 2010 Planning Commission meeting. In order to be ready for that hearing, I would need to complete and distribute my staff report by the middle of next week (week of 4/5/10). With my current work load, I am concerned that I will not have adequate time to review a redesigned project in the time remaining, unless q 9 P J 9, your redesigned plans are submitted in good order by 4/5/10. That being said, there are few options at this time. Since the project has been noticed in the paper and continued once, the Planning Commission will have to take an action on the 14th. It is unlikely they will want to once again continue the action. If the action is to table the project to a date uncertain, a new official notice would have to be done, requiring an additional publication fee at a future date. You may withdraw the application at this time and resubmit at a later date. This would require that the CUP fee be paid again at that time. We would waive the SEPA fee and except the same SEPA checklist with corrected site plans. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Scott Johns [mailto:Sjohns@cityofpa.us] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:39 AM To: Jerry Bauer Cc: Sue Roberds Subject: Re: 728 Caroline C.U.P. Revised Plan Jerry, thanks for the updated information for your CUP application. Many of our issues were resolved by the new information. The phased approach is still somewhat problematic. As we discussed, the proposed ARU is larger than the existing single family residence, but not large enough to become the primary structure with the existing structure becoming the ARU. The risk in this is that if any unforseen circumstance arises that would stop the process once the first new structure is complete, the city will be left with a nonconforming situation. One solution may be that the city permit the first new structure as the primary residence, with a subsequent action to allow the second new structure to be constructed later to replace the (now) primary residence with the second unit being double the space of the first structure built. In order for this to work, your building plan would have to show that a larger portion of the ground floor of the initial structure be counted as livable space. For that to happen, the interior walls would have to be finished and the area heated. My rough calculations indicate that the west 1/2 of the lower floor garage would bring the livable area of the first new structure up enough to be twice the area of the existing residential unit. Then, when phase 2 begins, that area of the first unit would need to return to garage use so that the second new structure would double the livable area of the first structure. The city would require that you sign a document that would be attached to the property title stating that the property could only support one full sized residence and an ARU that would not be more than 1/2 of the area of the primary residence area. Please consider this alternative and let me know if it is an acceptable option. If so, revised floor plans and a brief narrative of your intent will be required. Please feel free to call me if you need additional discussion. (04/07/2010) Scott Johns-RE: CUP at 728 C oline � Page 3. Scott K. Johns AICP Associate Planner City of Port Angeles 360-417-4752 To: City of Port Angeles I am writing in support of the application of the Bauers at 728 Caroline St. to construct a building near the alley, demolish the existing house, and construct a new house in its place. I think there are four sound reasons for approval. It is a prime lot with a fine view of the mountains, while a two-storey house would also have a good view of the water. The present dwelling is of little value. 1. The new buildings would enhance the appearance of the area. 2. The new buildings would significantly raise the tax base without requiring invest- ment by the city for utilities, streets, or alleys. All of these are present. 3. The materials and labor required to build these structures will be most welcome in this down-economy. 4. When the Bauers retire and move here they will bring with them income from outside the community which will have a significant impact on the community economics. Sincerely, V 2 C E 0 2 LS U L� D MAR 2 4 2010 T. A Burton CITY OF PORT ANGELES Dept.of community Development 732 Caroline St. ��a-� 77 -11119n-) Port Angeles, WA 98362 360 452 3746 March 24, 2010 1 '01R, CITY OF _e , T Ni" _jELES All___. `- WAS H I N G T O N, U. S. A. COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMO COMMUNITY DATE: March 24, 2010 ECONOMIC TO: Planning Commission DEVELOPMENT Nathan West FROM: Scott K. Johns, AICP Director 417-4751 RE: CUP 10-01 Bauer Sue Roberds Due to circumstances with the review of the proposal for an ARU in the RS-7 Planning Manager zone, CUP 10-01 Bauer, the applicant has requested that the public hearing be 417-4750 continued to the Planning Commission's April 14, 2010, regularly scheduled Scott Johns meeting. Associate Planner A copy of the e-mail requesting the continuance is attached. 417-4752 Roberta Korcz Assistant Planner 417-4804 Jim Lierly Building Inspector 417-4816 Linda Pangrle Permit Technician 417-4815 Patrick Bartholick Compliance Officer 417-4712 Fax: 360-417-4711 Dear Mr. Johns, Thank you for your review of our revised plans. We are interested in the proposal that you outlined below. We are going to need some time to review our plans, evaluate them based on this new information, and evaluate them to correct the error I made in using 33% lot coverage instead of the 30% in the code. We realize that we are not going to be ready for the meeting on March 24. Per your later message, we request continuance so that our application can be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a later time. Again, thank you for your work on this and we look forward to having solid plans in place that can be approved so that we can move forward. Jerry and Juanita Bauer • • STATj;O� O y �yy iaee Ao STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775 •Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 -(360)407-6300 791 for Washington Relay Service •Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 March 18,2010 Sue Roberds, Planning Manager City of Port Angeles Community and Economic Development PO Box 1150 Port Angeles,WA 98362 Dear Ms. Roberds: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the prethreshold consultation for the Bauer Accessory Residential Unit project(CUP 10-01)located at 728 Caroline as proposed by Gerald and Juanita Bauer. The Department of Ecology(Ecology) reviewed the environmental checklist and has the following comment(s): TOXICS CLEANUP: Connie Groven (360)407-6254 This property is within a half mile of several known or suspected contaminated sites. If contamination is currently known or observed during construction,sampling of the potentially contaminated media must be conducted. If contamination of soil or groundwater is readily visible,or is revealed by sampling, Ecology must be notified. Contact the Environmental Report Tracking System Coordinator at the Southwest Regional Office at(360)407-6300. For assistance and information about subsequent cleanup and to identify the type of testing that will be required contact Connie Groven. WASTE 2 RESOURCES: Anya Caudill(360)407-6084 Property owners,developers,and contractors are encouraged to recycle all possible leftover construction,demolition,and land clearing(CDL)materials and reduce waste generated. Recycling construction debris is often less expensive than landfill disposal. Please visit http://1800recycle.wa.pov or call the 1-800-RECYCLE hotline to find facilities that that will accept your CDL materials for reuse or recycling. Please consider the use of low-toxic building products and finishes,and incorporating building materials that have been salvaged or are made from recycled materials to the greatest extent possible in the project. Please call Ariona for green building information and technical assistance at(360)407-6351. March 18,2010 Page 2 WATER QUALITY: Roberta Woods (360)407-6269 Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW,Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A,Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington,and is subject to enforcement action. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing,grading,or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand,silt,clay particles,and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. Proper disposal of construction debris must be on land in such a manner that debris cannot enter the stormdrains draining to waters of the state or cause water quality degradation of state waters. During construction,all releases of oils, hydraulic fluids,fuels,other petroleum products, paints, solvents,and other deleterious materials must be contained and removed in a manner that will prevent their discharge to waters and soils of the state. The cleanup of spills should take precedence over other work on the site. A permanent vegetative cover should be established on denuded areas at final grade if they are not otherwise permanently stabilized. All temporary erosion control systems should be designed to contain the runoff from the developed two year,24-hour design storm without eroding. Provision should be made to minimize the tracking of sediment by construction vehicles onto paved public roads. If sediment is deposited, it should be cleaned every day by shoveling or sweeping. Water cleaning should only be done after the area has been shoveled out or swept. Ecology's comments are based upon information provided by the lead agency. As such,they may not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments, please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office (SM:10-0982) cc: Gerald and Juanita Bauer, proponents Connie Groven,SWRO-TCP Anya Caudill,SWRO-W2R Roberta Woods, SWRO-WQ • ti3 _,�,^ �� r�� 'r°/� r. • i PROPOSED USE INFORMATION: Construction of a structure meeting the definition of an accessory residential unit(ARU) in Port Angeles Municipal Code 17.08.010(B),meeting the Area and Dimensional Requirements of section 17.10.050. Prior to occupying the new structure,the existing single family home will be demolished and the site cleared as shown in the site plans included with this application. A phase 2 concept is included to demonstrate that a main single family home can be built in the future, meeting the size, lot coverage,site coverage, and setback requirements of the existing zoning. We are not applying to construct the main single family house at this time. Y CITY OF PORT ANGELES NOTICE OF POSTING J I PAT BARTHOLICK, state that on the day of 2010, I posted said notice, a true copy of which is hereto attached and made part hereof pursuant to Section 17.96.140 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code, on the property proposed for a land use action. AFFIANT Subscribed to me this day of 2010. P S RSB NOTARY PUBLIC for th State of Washington, residing in Port Angeles EXA, 02-24 z A - IS LI 'D <0 AS►V\ T/forms/affidavitpostingj im s CITY OF PORT ANGELES NOTICE OF MAILING RE: I, SUE ROBERDS, state that on the day of 2010, I mailed said notice, a true copy of which is hereto attached and made part hereof pursuant to Section 17.96.140 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code, to the persons noted on the attached list. In addition, the notice was posted on the front lobby bulletin board\`i�t�� �I I I�lf)N� ` k}obby of City Hall. 0TAq` A 03/01/12 _ i -6 p�8LIc..:'o AFFIA T •........... Ill Subscribed to me this day of 2010. NOTARY PUBLIC for the State of Washington, residing in Port Angeles T/forms/affidavitmail ing CITY OF PORT ANGELES NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on February 23, 2010, the CITY OF PORT ANGELES received an application to allow an ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNIT in the RS-7 Residential Single Family zone by conditional use permit. The application was considered to be complete on February 23, 2010. The CITY OF PORT ANGELES PLANNING COMMISSION will conduct a public hearing on the request on MARCH 24, 2010. Interested parties are encouraged to comment on the request and to attend the public hearing that will begin at 6 p.m., City Hall, 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, Washington. Written comment must be submitted no later than March 18, 2010, to be included in the staff report. Information may be reviewed at the City Department of Community & Economic Development, City Hall, P.O. Box 1150, Port Angeles. City Hall is accessible to persons with disabilities. Interested parties are invited to attend the meeting STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT: It is anticipated that a determination of non signficance will be issued for the project following the required review period that ends on March 18, 2010. APPLICANT: GERALD AND JUANITA BAUER LOCATION: 728 Caroline Street For further information contact: Sue Roberds, (360) 417-4750 PUB: 3/3/10 POST: 3/1/10 MAIL: 3/1/10 T:\NOTICES\PCpublichearing.wpd Impression a sechage rapide et antibourrage www.avery.com a AVEPdY®8160"" Utilisez le gabarit 8160-c 1-800-GO-AVERY MARIE EIKUM GARY&APRIL HEILMAN JOHN RICKENBACHER 722 GEORGIANA ST 726 GEORGIANA ST 121 E 2ND ST PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 BONNIE A FIDLER TTE DONARD & F O'NEILL THOMAS & MINNIE BLOMBERG 306 E FRONT#4 2600 E SELTICE WAY#247 215 N FRANCIS ST PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 POST FALLS, ID 83854-7941 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 i r Impression h sechage rapide et antibourrage www.avery.com AVERY®8160""1 Utilisez le gabarit 8160mc • 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 , I JAMES D HOARE ROBERT& NANCY BLOOMw PATRICIA L ZELLINSKY 811 CAROLINE ST PO BOX 141 723 CAROLINE ST PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 ARLINGTON, WA 98223-0141 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 GALGANO FAMILY TRUST WILLIAM M KEELEY GARY&CATHERINE GRIFFIN 715 CAROLINE ST 713 CAROLINE ST PO BOX 230758 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 ENCINATAS, CA 92023 GLENN & MARIEWIGGINS PAMELA PURSLEY TERESA M WOOD 702 CAROLINE ST CAROLYN MAYS 710 CAROLINEST PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 2384 WAILEA BEACH DRIVE PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 BANNING, CA 92220 JOHN W RODIUS HARRY EDWIN HEBERT THEODORE& FREDA BURTON 710 CAROLINE ST 1638 W 7TH ST 732 CAROLINE ST PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 MARY M DAVIS RES LIFE ESTATE JULIAN C MCCABE JR MAXINE P WHITMAN 317 N FRANCIS ST 802 CAROLINE ST 736 CAROLINE ST PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 JOHN &CHRISTY WRIGHT VICKIE A DODD-ETAL EARL E JOHNSTON 824 CAROLINE STREET 2399 E. 3RD AVE 807 GEORGIANA ST PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 KIRK& MAUREEN THOMPSON NORTHWEST KIDNEY CTRS LAIRD & CYNTHIA BENSON 192 HARVEL LN 700 BROADWAY 735 GEORGIANA PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 SEATTLE, WA 98122 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 MICHAEL HILLIARD LEAH ERB-TRUST WILLIAM J PELKY B LEDGERWOOD 839 W 6TH ST 132 W 4TH ST 721 GEORGIANA ST PORT ANGELES, WA 98363 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 NATHALIE A REED GARY D CHILDERS LILLIAN BERG PO BOX 2802 PO BOX 247 704 GEORGIANA ST PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 k LANE F ROWLAND KAREN A BORNEMAN CARL& MARIANNE CASE TTE i 520 W 16TH ST 714 GEORGIANA ST 816 LENLOCK DR SE PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 HUNTSVILLE, AL 35802-1928 AHEI V-09-008-1 wi0918 31b'ldIN31®/GanV ash wi091.8®A21-BlAw ICY//1 UJOYAJAAWAAAAAA .}` 6uauua aajj wer nue a6nnwc R.ECHVED MAR - 4 2010 P--oRTAN 1ELES. CITY OF PORT ANGELES Dept.of Community Development WASHINGTON , U . S . A . PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE : --Ve�� 4, 2010 TO : ROBERTA KORCZ, ASSISTANT PLANNER FROM: ERIC WALRATH, ASSISTANT CIVIL ENGINEER - SUBJECT : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — 728 CAROLINE STREET Roberta, Public Works Engineering has reviewed the attached proposal and has the following comments: The existing driveway from Caroline Street will need to be removed and full height curb restored or reconstructed to meet the minimum 7.5' setback from a side lot line. Sidewalk will need to be constructed along the full lot frontage. An easement for the east 15' of the lot will need to be granted to the City for the existing sanitary sewer main crossing the property. NQWMENGINEER\Building Permits\728 Caroline Street\Engineering Comments.doc (3/1/2010) Roberta Korcz CUP 10-01-1 Page 1 From: Ken Dubuc To: Roberta Korcz Date: 3/1/2010 10:42 AM Subject: CUP 10-01 Roberta- The Fire Department has reviewed CUP 10-01 for Bauer and we have no objections. Address numbers will need to be provided for the new residence. Numbers must be at least 6"tall and of a contrasting color from their background. thanks! Ken Dubuc Assistant Chief/Fire Marshal • CITY OF "OR", NGELES `- W A S H I N G T O N, U. S. A. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT D CCCQ � RD 2" 2010 Date: February 25, 2010 CitY of Public Works Port'd Utilities Dept. Engineering Services Division To: Public Works and Utilities From: Roberta Korcz, Assistant Planner Subject: Conditional Use Permit - CUP 10-01 � J BAUER— 728 Caroline Street The attached conditional use permit application is for an accessory residential unit in the RS-7 Residential Single Family zone. This is phase one of a two phase project that will include demolishing and rebuilding the existing residential structure. The rear setback, shown as 10 feet, will need to increase to 20 feet per zoning requirements. Please let me know if you have any concerns regarding this no later than March 10 proposal , 2010. Thank you! Attachments 0 • CITY OF OjR, -.r- NGELES PE �`- W A S H I N G T O N, U. S. A. DATE: , 2/26/10 MEMO TO: SEPA Register COMMUNITY & RE: SEPA Review – BAUER ECONOMIC Conditional Use Permit – CUP 10-01 DEVELOPMENT Please include the attached environmental checklist for a Nathan West conditional use permit to allow an accessory residential unit Director 417-4751 g y in the RS-7, Residential Single Family zone in the next SEPA Register. Sue Roberds Planning Manager Thank you, 417-4750 Scott Johns Associate Planner Sue Koberds 417-4752 Planning Manager Roberta Korcz City of Port Angeles Assistant Planner 417-4804 Jim Lierly Building Inspector 417-4816 Linda Pangrle Permit Technician 417-4815 Patrick Bartholick Compliance Officer Building Inspector 417-4712 Derek Beery Archaeologist 417-4704 Fax: 360-417-4711 o 0 W �►.-- NNGELES WASHINGTON, U. S. A. COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Date: February 26, 2010 To: Public Works and Utilities From: Roberta Korcz, Assistant Planner Subject: Conditional Use Permit- CUP 10-01 BAUER — 728 Caroline Street The attached conditional use permit application is for an accessory residential unit in the RS-7 Residential Single Family zone. This is phase one of a two phase project that will include demolishing and rebuilding the existing residential structure. The rear setback, shown as 10 feet, will need to increase to 20 feet per zoning requirements. Please let me know if you have any concerns regarding this proposal no later than March 10, 2010. Thank you! Attachments. Appl.# APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION: Applicant: GE&AL.D M. `r S�A�-iiY4 Q.4�CYZ Address: 16266 ssL4"O V'v,, LN A L&KSLTi C,6 QA Daytime phone#: �/�-�—OSS j qBD 5 Applicant's representative(ifother than applicant): /,J�,Q Address: Daytime phone#: Property owner(if other than applicant): 5A Address: Daytime phone#: PROPERTY INFORMATION: Street address: 7aCA1ZOL---111JC S T aCC-r Po 21 A N CC-c,C-S Legal description: S°"s=���,�"��"�A� I� LOT —5 C X C E4 5 E 8L 3C, Zoning: Comprehensive Plan designation: P012-T ANC—C,-CS U-aA Property dimensions: 5 d X 14a Property area(total square feet): 7 0 0 0 Physical characteristics(i.e.,flat,sloped,vacant,developed,etc.): 1 rR2A.I tJ -05 Ig r--LAT i SLOPE-D _ D£V£Lap£D L. a7W Oz-NG.c_£ FAII-�LY HoLA5C PROPOSED USE INFORMATION: Please describe the proposed conditional use: Number of employees: N/A Hours of operation: NIA Number of on-site parking spaces: .3 Building area (total square feet of floor area for the proposed activity): R72- kC5i©CwT]ra L. SIGNATURES: Applicant: ac-aAL.-D t-A. d' ZL.oN!L'`A (3/JL,._E2 Icertijy that all of the above statements are true and complete to the best of my knowledge and acknowledge that wilful misrepresentation of information will terminate this permit application. I have read this application in its entirety and understand that my submittal will be reviewed for completeness. If found to be complete the application will be scheduled for the next available Planning Commission meeting. Ifnot complete,when requested information has been received the application will be scheduled for the next available meeting. Signature,.. Date %/0 &nA:1-74 '/7 6Ln( O Owner(i ther than applicant): I am the owner of the subject property identified herein and approve of this application. Signature Date For Staff Use Only: Permit No. Appl. complete Add. Info requested PROPOSED USE INFORMATION: Construction of a structure meeting the definition of an accessory residential unit(ARU)in Port Angeles Municipal Code 17.08.010(B),meeting the Area and Dimensional Requirements of section 17.10.050. Prior to occupying the new structure,the existing single family home will be demolished and the site cleared as shown in the site plans included with this application. A phase 2 concept is included to demonstrate that a main single family home can be built in the future, meeting the size, lot coverage,site coverage,and setback requirements of the existing zoning. We are not applying to construct the main single family house at this time. Dri 5X16 ' Drive 15 X 10 ARU 30 X 30 + 15X6 UTILITY ESMT 10 FT .�°' Hayti House G. . "' • 25 X 40 F Garage Extension r Drive 15X20 Front Deck N- Phase 2 (Future) Project Concept ao'-z UT 17\ 0 = LryJrlf�Y Garage _ r s„Xg-s., M� Floor Plan _ GARAGE 14'-4'x 28'-2' v � I I I ,4.•4„x 24�-r i 1 ► I I - I N ✓' x BATFj3s BATH BEDPOOMLoft I y$xJ5" I I Floor I I "� i 4WP N DN I BEDCOM Plan � „ X3.s, I ,,._,"xi,•.4" I i e m I ( I 4 ( LIVING CUMET I _ ICE r_„ x r.,” i I i U It (i I • 07CH N I1+•-4'x s ... .... DECK I R I »•„''� _ South a Side Elevation e i • _. 0 F-T` f.� North . ,µ .. • Side � Elevation ............................ ...................... r East F. a' • Sideg. Elevation • West i Side Elevation • Site Elevation • 572L`E�T v • l.5 Perspective View i �„vim Phase 2 ( Future) Project Concept South Perspective • ............... ■ • c � � r, Size,average and Code Compiia& Garage/ARU Square Footage Living Space First Floor 85 Second Floor 887 Total 972 Ground Coverage Building 972 Drive/Deck 390 Total Coverage 1362 House(Future) Square Footage; Living Space Basement 805 First Floor 786 Second Floor 789 Total 2380 Ground Coverage Building 1250 Drive 300 Front Deck 120 Total Coverage 1670 Lot Square Feet 7000 Code Requ�renients - Requirement Actual; House/ARU SF 2X Minimum 2.45 Lot Coverage 1/3 SF 2333.33 2222 Site Coverage 1/2 SF 3500 3032 House Setbacks(Future) Front 20 Feet 20 Feet East Lot Line(Easement) 10 Feet 12 Feet West Lot Line 7 Feet 8 Feet Height 30 Feet 29 Feet Garage/ARU Setbacks Rear 1/3 (FT from Alley) 46.67 46 Feet Alley 10 Feet 10 Feet East Lot Line(Easement) 10 Feet 12 Feet West Lot Line 3 Feet 8 Feet Height 30 Feet 26 Feet Geographic ID (Leading Zero) Address Owner 630005132550000 811 CAROLINE JAMES D HOARE 630005132350000 N/A CITY OF PORT ANGELES 630005133000000 727 CAROLINE ROBERT D/NANCY BLOOM 630005133200000 723 CAROLINE PATRICIA L ZELLINSKY 630005133500000 719 CAROLINE GALGANO FAMILY TRUST 630005133700000 715 CAROLINE GALGANO FAMILY TRUST 630005133800000 713 CAROLINE WILLIAM M KEELEY 630005133900000 705 CAROLINE GARY/CATHERINE GRIFFIN 630005136450000 702 CAROLINE GLENN R/MARIE W WIGGINS 630005136350000 708 CAROLINE PAMELA PURSLEY AND CAROLYN MAYS 630005136300000 710 CAROLINE TERESA M WOOD 630005136250000 N/A Empty Lot JOHN W RODIUS 630005136200000 718 CAROLINE HARRY EDWIN HEBERT 630005136150000 N/A Empty Lot GALGANO FAMILY TRUST 630005136100000 728 Caroline GERALD M/JUANITA BAUER 630005136050000 732 Caroline THEODORE/FREDA BURTON 630005136000000 736 Caroline MARY M DAVIS RES LIFE ESTATE 630005137400000 317 N FRANCIS JULIAN C MC CABE JR 630005137300000 802 CAROLINE MAXINE P WHITMAN 630005137150000 818 CAROLINE JOHN W/CHRISTY WRIGHT 630005137500000 801 GEORGIANA VICKIE A DODD-ETAL 630005137550000 807 GEORGIANA EARL E JOHNSTON 630004200003010 811 GEORGIANA KIRK L/MAUREEN THOMPSON TTE 630004200003030 811 GEORGIANA NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS 630005136900000 735 GEORGIANA LAIRD M &CYNTHIA L BENSON 630005136850000 729 GEORGIANA LEAH ERB-TRUST 630005136800000 727 GEORGIANA WILLIAM J PELKY 630005136700000 721 GEORGIANA MICHAEL HILLIARD/B LEDGERWOOD 630005136600000 717 GEORGIANA NATHALIE A REED 630005136500000 305 N EUNICE GARY D CHILDERS 630005139500000 704 GEORGIANA LILLIAN BERG 630005139400000 710 GEORGIANA LANE F ROWLAND 630005139350000 714 GEORGIANA KAREN A BORNEMAN 630005139300000 718 GEORGIANA CARL/MARIANNE CASE TTE 630005139250000 722 GEORGIANA MARIE EIKUM 630005139200000 726 GEORGIANA GARY D/APRIL D HEILMAN 630005139050000 734 GEORGIANA JOHN RICKENBACHER 630005139000000 222 N FRANCIS BONNIE A FIDLER TTE 630005139150000 N/A Empty Lot BONNIE A FIDLER TTE 630005139100000 216 N FRANCIS DONARD/F O'NEILL 630005138300000 215 N FRANCIS THOMAS/MINNIE BLOMBERG ArclMS Viewer v.zc.�. r i ONION Y MAP /StTE 300'* >306NOAClY 313510 513500 3 13 •! 4�Li 51337 Cq 513350 S1364 410513320 S 1363 �Sr 1357 513300 SU 51 1357 51362 514020 1362 513,235 513220 1401 513650 1361 5 5132 13610 51401 1360 513255 51400 13 514 t4 1 513257 513670 132 51407 513950 37 �^ 51 132& 51407 513740 � 51368 Cq 13690 514080 QJ 513945 51394 °ddZ0 F41-11-� r 1393 Pb rtA n gales 513715 1 137 92 51375 513710 513955 513700 706 g0 513900 420000 513960 51377 513705 512100 513975 513910 1377 1223 .4� 1377 1398 513830 137 PGS 101 1 513985 &�� F 1379 512220 C' 513825 CFD i IP, 1u 138 ti 51221 ', 580135 1381 1224 F af, 513840 1381 1 122 ° 512200 yT�r 51380 51225 5138 1 512260 � 1 http://www.clallam.net/aimsxwebsite/JUR_public_html_nopop/MapFrame.htm 1/30/2010