Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
727 Caroline St - Building
~"*' CITY OF PORT ANGELES '~ PUBLIC WORKS - BLrILDING DIVISION 321EAST 5TH STREET, PORT ANGELES, WA 98362 BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED: 3/12/2002 PERMIT NO: 13180 OWNER/APPLICANT PROPERTY LOCATION 727 CAROLINE ROBERT & NANCY BLOOM P. O. BOX 141 Lot: 1 & 2 ARLINGTON, WA 98223 Block: 33 [] Long Legal 360/435-0755 Subdivision: N.R. SMITH T: S: Parcel No: 063000513300000 CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT TERHUNE HOMES, INC N/A 19410 8TH AVE (POBOX 97) POULSBO, WA 98370 , 98360-0000 360/697-7000 360/000-0000 PROJECT INFO Project Value: $143,489.43 SFD Units: 0 Commercial: 0 Project Type: NEW SFD SFD SQ FT: 0 Industrial: 0 Occupancy Type: RESIDENTIAL Garage: 0 Occupancy Group: MFD Units: 0 Construction Type: MFD SQ FT: 0 Zoning Use: PROJECT NOTES CONSTRUCT A NEW SFR, TWO STORY, 1ST FLOOR 830 SQ. FT., 2ND. FLOOR 896.5 SQ. FT. & 462 SQ. FT ATTACHED GARAGE, WITH 309.5 SQ. FT. PORCH & COVERED DECK FEES ASSESSMENT Misc Fee 1: $0.00 Building Permit: $1,240.15 Plan Check: $496.06 Misc Fee 2: $0.00 State Surcharge: $4.50 Misc Fee 3: $0.00 House Moving: $0.00 Manufactured Home: $0.00 Sign: $0.00 TOTAL FEE: $1,920.01 Plumbing: $112.00 AMOUNT PAID: $1,920.01 Mechanical: $67.30 BALANCE DUE: $0.00 Radon: $0.00 Separate Permits are required for electrical work, SEPA, Shoreline, ESA, utilities, private and public improvements. This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days, if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after the work as commenced, or if required inspections have not been requested within 180 days from the lasl inspection. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or net. The granting of a permit does not presume [o gk, e authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any state or local law regulating construction or the performance of constructibn. ~ ~.g~at~e of Co~tractor or Authorized Agent Date Signature of Owner (if owner is builder) Date BUILDING PERMIT INSPECTION RECORD CALL 417-4815 FOR BUILDING INSPECTIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM 24 HOUR NOTICE. ITIS UNLAWFUL TO COVER, INSULATE OR CONCEAL ANY WORK BEFORE INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED. POST PERMIT IN A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION. KEEP PERMIT CARD AND APPROVED PLANS AT JOB SITE INSPECTION TYPE I DATE IyEsACCEPTEDI NO COMMENTS FOVNOATION: / ~EU FLOOU/SL~U I WATER LINE CEIL~GWALLS FRAMING JOISTS/ GI~ERS WALLS ~ ROOF / CEIL~G DRYWALL MECDANICAL HEAT PUMP SEWER CO~ECTION SANITARY PARKING/LIGHTING ESA: LANDSCAPING SHO~LINE; RESIDENTIAL DATE YES NO COMMERCIAL DATE ACCEDED YES NO CONSTRU~ION R.W, / PW/ CONSTRU~ION- R.W, BUILDING 41%4815 ~ BULLDOG C:~PPL.WPD ~*'"~'-~'~ BUILDING PERMIT- APPLICATION ~:~,~~ ~ Bulling P~mlt - P~pplication ~ be~d out ~lete~. Pl~e ~ or p~t in h~ Ryou ba~ any quufion~ pl~ ~fl 417~815 - _ ~one. . T~E OF WO~ m Mulfi-~ily m A~fi~ m Move m O~ge ~SF. ~ $ ~F.- $ ~ ~0~ ~ mPRO~:Si~ .C~~ __, ~ ~ r~V~UA~ON~~ ~,$ ~os CO~RC~S~E~L: O~p~,Gmhp: ~ O~up~t ~d: Come.on T~: No. ofStod~: ~ ~tS~: ~,0~ ~ %L~v~e: [~ Exis~g~Cove~g~5./ /~.~+~sed~t~g~: I~O~ /~.[=TOT~TCO~OE: [2 ~ /~.ff P~G USE O~Y: ~PROV~: Pemi~ ~u~d: Not~: M~. HeiSt: Se~:' ~g: DPW Sit~ PI~ ~d Use Approved by: Da~: ES~*tl~d(s): m Yes m No SBPA Chec~ist mqu~? m Y~ m No ~en O~R ~ Bulldog Division m provide you wi~ mom d~il~d ~fomafion on ~* application ~d pl~ ~bmi~ ~. B~G P~ ~P~CA~ON S~I-~'~: Yo~ rumpled ~pli~o~ s~ p~ (for ad.om) pl~ ~ to be ~bmi~d to ~, BuR~g Division. VALUA~ON OF CON~U~ON: ~ ~ ~, a ~h~on ~omt m~ be ~d by ~e appli~ ~is fi~ will b~ ~i~ed ~d may be m~ by ~* Build~g ~v. ~ ~ply w~ ~t ~ ~h~. Con~ ~ P~t ~t~ ~ 4174815 f~ ~s~. P~ ~ ~E: Yo~ pie ch~ck ~ ~ due ~ ~* ~e ~e build~g p~it applimfi~ ~d come.ion pl~ ~e ~bmi~d. Ail o~r pe~it fees ~ du~ ~ ~ ~e of p~t Bsu~ce, E~ON OF P~ ~W: If no ~it B ~u~ will. 18~ ~ays of ~e ~ of applimfion, l~ons. ~e Build~g Offiai~ ~ ~d ~e ~e for ~ by ~e ~pRmtup m 180 da~, on ~ mqu~ by I ~eby c~t~ t~t I ~e r~d ~ ~i~ th~ ~pl~ation ~ ~w the ~ame to be ~e a~ co~t, ~d I ~ ~thor~ed to apply for thi~ permit. I un~rsta~ It ~ not t~ Ci~'s legM r~po~ibili~ to ~te~ine wh~ ~mi~ are re~ired; it obtain suck r~po~ibili~ to determine what permi~ ~e r~uir~ o~ to Permit Conditions For: 13180 Building review comments for, Robert & Nancy Bloom, Located at 727 Caroline Planning Dept.-- Sue Roberds 1-15-2002 1 .The site is zoned RS-7. The proposal will result in the construction of a single family residence and detached garage with a total lot coverage of 12%. The lot size 13,000 square feet in area. The property is located atop a steep slope that drops north and east. A 50' setback from the top of the bank will be required unless certification from an engineer allows a reduced setback per 15.24.070 PMAC. A SEPA checklist will be required for the review. Planning Dept. -Sue Roberds 3-5-2002 Reference: ESA 02-01, SEPA: A determination of Non-Significance(#972) has been issued for the proposal, See Conditions. 1. A hold harmless agreement approved by the City shall be filed prior to issuance of building permit or any site preparation on property. 2. Submit new site plan showing required bldg. set per geotechnical report. Light Dept. -- John Hebner 1. Per my field review and phone call to Terhune Homes LLC., I have determined that the existing electrical plant will nott accommodate their new building without modification, because a heat pump is being installed. 2. I will need to upgrade the transformer size. This will be done without cost to the customer. Please have them provide me with the LRA (Lock Rotor Amps), tonnage and KW ratingof heat pump as soon as possible. 3. The existing transformer will accommodate their temporary service, but the upgrade will need to be complete before the heat pump can be energized. Public Works Engineering -- Trenia Funston 1. Submit topographic layout of property. 2.2" water main in Caroline, will require an extension line to east. 3.Sanitary sewer in Caroline (west of lot 2) 4.Driveway to conform to city standards(6" conc. in city right of way) 5.Zoning lot covenant. 6.Submit detail showing storm drainage from site. 7.Show bluff setback requirements. Fire Dept. -- Ken Dubuc 1 .Address numbers must be provided for the structure. Numbers shall be at least 5" CITY OF PORT ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ........... INSPECTION REPORT ........... REQUEST: · Date '- ,' Time Received by .(phone, person) Location of Work to be inspected Name of person requesting inspection ~ Address of person requesting inspection Phone No. Type of Inspection (circle appropriate one): Permit No. / ~ J c~ Sewer Foundation Framing Chimney Plumbing Final Sewer Excav. Other / INSPECTION NOTES:~ , Inspected: Date ~ , Time. By Remarks: RESTORATION REQUIRED ...... YES. NO SURFACE RESTORATION: SURFACE TYPE: [] Unimproved []Gravel []Asphalt []PCC []Other [] Repaired by City Work Order # [] Repaired by Permittee [] COMPLETE [] No Damage Found [] INCOMPLETE (Continue on reverse side if necessary) STREET SUPERINTENDENT {DATE) CITY OF PORT ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ........... INSPECTION REPORT ........... REQUEST: Date Time Received by ~, (phone, person) Location of Work to be inspected / Name of person requesting inspection Address of person requesting inspection Phone No. Type of Inspection (circle appropriate one): Permit No./Z Sewer Foundation Framing Chimney Plumbing Final Sewer Excav. Other .... INSPECTION NOTES: Inspected: Date .w Time. By Remarks: /~ ~ RESTORATION REQUIRED ...... YES NO SURFACE RESTORATION: SURFACE TYPE: [] Unimproved [~]Gravel []Asphalt []PCC []Other [] Repaired by City Work Order # E] Repaired by Permittee [] COMPLETE [] No Damage Found [] INCOMPLETE (Continue on reverse side if necessary) STREET SUPERINTENDENT (DATE) CITY OF PORT ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ........... INSPECTION REPORT ........... REQUEST: Date ~- ~,~ ~'-~ - Time ~ ,' ~-~ ~ Received by ,~ ~./x/ (phone, person) Location of Work to be inspected "~ Z"-~ C~:~v~O [~.~ ~ ~ Name of person requesting inspection ~'! vi/(. ~_o ~' Address of person requesting inspection Phone No. Type of Inspection (circle appropriate one): Permit No. Sewer Foundation' Framing Chimney Plumbing Final Sewer Excav. Other ~l ls INSPECTION NOTES: Inspected: Date ~ --~'- ~ ~ Time. By //~ ~,~ Remarks: SURFACE RESTORATION: SURFACE TYPE: [] Unimproved []Gravel [-]Asphalt [~PCC [~Other [] Repaired by City Work Order # [] Repaired by Permittee [] COMPLETE [] No Damage Found [] INCOMPLETE (Continue on reverse side if necessary) STREET SUPERINTENDENT (DATE) CITY OF PORT ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ........... INSPECTION REPORT ........... REQUEST: Date ~> - ~ ~ -O ~_ Time Received by /~_ (// (phone, person) Location of Work to be inspected -~) ~- '~ (--~C,3~c2 I~ ~ ~ Name of person requesting inspection Address of person requesting inspection Phone No. Type of Inspection (circle appropriate one): Permit No. Sewer d Framing Chimney Plumbing Final Sewer Excav. Other NSPECT O. NOTES , Inspected: Date ',,. ~' ~. ~ Time. By / Remarks: RESTORATION REQUIRED ...... YES. NO SURFACE RESTORATION: SURFACE TYPE: [] Unimproved I--}Gravel ~]Asphalt []PCC [~Other [] Repaired by City Work Order # [] Repaired by Permittee [] COMPLETE []No Damage Found [] INCOMPLETE (Continue on reverse side if necessary) STREET SUPERINTENDENT (DATE) CITY OF PORT ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION REPORT REQUEST~ O Date Time Received phone, person) Location of Work to be inspected ".~ Z -~ 3/~ ~'~: ': ~ - ~ '~ Name of person requesting inspection Address of person requesting inspection Phone No. Permit No. Type of Inspection (circle appropriate one): ~:~ Sewer Foundation Framing Chimney lumbin~ Final Sewer Excav. Other..' INSPECTION NOTES: Inspected: Date Time By Remarks: RESTORATION REQUIRED ...... YES NO ;URFACE RESTORATION: SURFACE TYPE: [] Unimproved []Gravel []Asphalt I-~PCC []Other _ [] Repaired by City Work Order # [] Repaired by Permittee [] COMPLETE [] No Damage Found [] INCOMPLETE (Continue on reverse side if necessary) STREET SUPERINTENDENT (DATE) CITY OF PORT ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ........... INSPECTION REPORT ........... REQUEST: Date ~ * '~-- ,~- ~ Time Received by (phone, person) Location of Work to be inspected ~7 /~ ~ i ~'/~'~.~ ~ Name of person requesting inspection Address of person requesting inspection, Phone No. Type of Inspection (circle appropriate one): Permit No. Sewer Foundation Framing Chimney Plumbin~.F_i~al~JSewerExcav. Other INSPECTION NOTES: Inspected: Date ~ ~ --- ~-- Time By ~ Remarks: RESTORATION REQUIRED ...... YES NO SURFACE RESTORATION: SURFACE TYPE: [] Unimproved []Gravel []Asphalt [~]PCC []Other [] Repaired by City Work Order # [] Repaired by Permittee [] COMPLETE [] No Damage Found [] INCOMPLETE (Continue on reverse side if necessary) STREET SUPERINTENDENT (DATE) REASONABLE USE DEVELOPMENT EXCEPTIO J~]~}] 2 0 2002_ L WAIVER OF LIABILITY AGREEMENT Cra' OF PORT ANGELES - L'OMMUNffY OEVELOPMENT Name: Robert & Nancy Bloom Date: March 12, 2002 Address: PO Box 141 Arlington WA 98223-0141 Phone: 360-435-0755 In consideration of approval of the following described work at: 727 Caroline St, Port Angeles Washington 98362 for the purpose of: construction of residence in an environmentally sensitive area on property_ that contains both a marine bluff and a steep slope the undersigned on behalf of the property owners and their heirs and assigns, hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City of Port Angeles and its officials, employees and agents harmless against any claims and/or lawsuits for personal injury and/or property damage arising out of, or in any way connected with, the above described proposal except for injuries or damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Datedthis 1'7-.. dayof ,P'~.~./brt'_..~ 20.~_~-. SUBSCRIBED a,l'*.d _',~m.~_,,too me this/, day of /!//_././'t~b. 20/-~ * i/ W shin /residin / lington. ',.._ ,,,,~?.~..-" ff - [ / "d/~ ',, ~'.* O~ ~&~.k'" ........ My Comm~ss~o'''-~~' ~, n expires e:\wp\formsXholdharm.esa O! O~ ll:04, aP°~ Mar Ol O~ lO'.~a ...... P.j .... Document '~tle(s) Reference Numbers(s) of rel~ed d~umen~ ~s~sor's ProPe~ Tax ParceFAccount N~m~r ZONING LOT COVENANT ~l~l. ~MAN R LT$ I~C ~TEXC WIO'BL 33 ESA 02-01 pORTANGELES WASHINGTON, U.S.A. Environmentally Sensitive Area Decision Date: March 5, 2002 File Number: ESA 02-01 Applicant: Robert and Nancy Bloom Owner: Same Proposed Action: Single family construction in an environmentally sensitive area (geologic hazard and marine bluff) Location: 727 Caroline Street Lots 1 and 2, Block 33, Norman R. Smith Subdivision SEPA: A Determination of NonSignificance (#972) has been issued for the proposal. DECISION: Approval with the following conditions: Conditions: 1. The side yard setback abutting Francis Street shall be no closer than 20' from the top of the Francis Street slope. Thc marine bluff(north) setback shall be no less than 45' south of the top of the marine bluffslope unless an engineered foundation is approved by the City. The west side yard setback shall be a minimum of 7', and the south setback from Caroline Street shall be no less than 20'. The Francis Street and marine bluff setbacks are based on the gcotechnical reports prepared for the subject property by Northwestern Tendtories, Inc. and dated September, 1997, and updated in May, 1999, and on January 24, 2002. The interior side and Caroline setbacks are per the Port Angeles Zoning Ordinance for RS-7 properties. 2. Compliance with all other recommendations of the geotechnical reports prepared and updated by Northwestern Tc~itories as of January 24, 2002, is required which includes: (1) Surface runoff from roofs, driveways and other impervious surfaces must bc collected and discharged to the municipal storm sewer system and/or tightlined to an approved discharge point at thc bottom of the bluff; (2) A 10-foot wide (minimum) natural vegetative buffer should be maintained along the top edge of the marine bluff and thc Francis Street slope. 3. A hold harmless agreement approved by the City shall be filed prior to issuance of a building permit or any site preparation on the subject property. ESA 02-01 - Bloom Page 2 Findings: 1. An application for review under Chapter 15.20 PAMC (Environmentally Sensitive Areas) was received on January 2g, 2002, from Robert and Nancy Bloom which proposed the construction of a single family dwelling on a property containing a geologic hazard area and a marine bluff. The proposal indicates a 46-foot setback from the top of the marine bluff and a variable 1 lfoot to 23 foot setback from the steep slope located along the east side of thc property. The interior side setback is proposed at 15 feet and the proposed setback off Caroline Street is 89.9 feet'. No disturbance of the bluff face is intended. 2. The subject property consists of Lots 1 and 2, Block 33, Normal R. Smith Subdivision to the Townsite of Port Angeles located at 727 Caroline Street. The site contains a marine bluff (north side) and a steep slope (east side). The upland portion of the site is basically level. The marine bluff is described as "grossly stable" (Northwestern Territories geoteclmical report) and is covered with dense brush and trees with an approximate 45 ° slope. No erosive wave action at the toe of the bank is possible as the area is protected by the development of the City's Waterfront Trail which includes protective shoreline rip rap. A dense growth of blackberry bushes covers the east slope which extends east at an approximate 40° slope to the Francis Street grade below. 3. The subject site is zoned RS-7, Residential Single Family. Standard setbacks for properties in the RS-7 zone that do not contain environmentally sensitive areas are 20 feet front and rear with a 7-foot interior side yard and a 13-foot comer side yard. Thirty (30%) percent lot coverage is permissible. 4. Soils are described as predominantly glacial till overlain by 10 to 15 feet of fine to medium sand. No signs of springs or seeps were observed on the bluff face during theJanuary, 2002, engineer's site visit. No recent evidence of significant slide activity was observed which is significant in view of extensive slide activity in this region during December, 1996, and January, 1997. 5. The September, 1997, geotechnical report prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc., recommended that a 35 to 45 foot marine (north) setback could be justified for a conventional foundation. The January 24, 2002, update recommends that a 45 foot setback be observed for a conventional foundation system with a reduction to 35 feet for an engineered foundation. The applicant has proposed a 46 foot setback with a conventional foundation. Similarly, the September, 1997 report recommended a 20 to 25 foot setback from Francis Street (east) with the January 2002, report recommending a 20 foot setback from the top of the Francis Street slope. The applicant's original site plan shows a varying east side yard, given the meander of the slope, from between 11 feet and 23 feet on the Francis Street side. 6. The subject property meets the definitions of a marine bluff and a landslide hazard area as defined by PAMC 15.20 (Environmentally Sensitive Areas Ordinance). The purpose of the Chapter is to protect environmentally sensitive areas in accordance with the Growth Management Act. The intent of the Chapter is to use a function and values approach and ESt 02-01 - Bloom Page 3 establish minimum standards for properties containing envirenmentall sensitive features in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare which includes: a J avoiding disturbance of these areas, b) mitigating such impacts, c) protecting the public from personal injury, loss of life or property damage due to erosion and landslides, etc., and d) protecting against publicly financed expenditures from misuse of environmentally sensitive areas. 7. An environmentally sensitive area includes landslide hazard areas which are def'med as an area potentially subject to risk of mass movement due to a combination of geologic, topographic, and hydrologic factors. Areas with a combination of slopes of 15% or steeper with impermeable soils (typically silt and clay) frequently interbedded with granular soils (predominantly sand and gravel) are considered landslide hazard areas. 8. Marine bluffs are coastal features resulting from wave erosion undercutting uplands located adjacent to the shoreline, creating vertical cliffs that are an important source of sediment for coastal drift processes and/or the landforms created by these processes. 9. Marine buffers may be reduced per 15.20.070(B)(4) PAMC when expert verification and environmental information demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director that the proposed construction method will: a.) Not adversely impact the stability of ravine sidewalls and bluffs; b.) Not increase erosion and mass movement potential of ravine sidewalls and bluffs; c.) Use construction techniques which minimize disruption of the existing topography and vegetation; and cl.)Include measures to overcome any geological, soils and hydrological constraints of the site. 10. Areas containing or adjacent to geological hazard areas shall be altered only when the Community Development Director concludes, based on environmental information, that: a.) The land clearing, grading or filling activities will adhere to best management practices; b.) Vegetation in erosion hazard areas will be preserved or replaced; c) There will be no increase in surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties; d.)There will be no decrease in slope stability on adjacent properties; and that there is no hazard as proven by evidence of no landslide activity in the past in the vicinity of the proposed development and a quantitative analysis of slope stability indicates no significant risk to the development proposal and adjacent properties. 11. All development proposals in environmentally sensitive areas shall comply with the requirements and provisions of Chapter 15.20 PAMC. The responsibility for administration and enforcement of the provisions of the Chapter shall rest with the Community Development Director or his designee. 12. The application included an environmental checklist as required under RCW 43.21C and PAMC 15.04. The checklist and supporting geotechnical data indicated that there were no potential environmental impacts such as unstable slopes or erosion. 13. The subject property has been totally cleared previously and overgrown with blackbemy bushes. ESA 02-01 - Bloom Page 4 14. As proposed, the foot print of the building will need to be adjusted to accommodate the required 20-foot east side yard setback per the recommendations of Northwestern Territories, Inc. The proposed building would encumber approximately 12% of the upland area 15. ADetermination of Nonsignificance (//972) was issued on March 5, 2002, by the City's SEPA Responsible Official in compliance with RCW 43.21C and WAC 197-11. Conclusions: 1. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the requirements for development within a previously disturbed area as defined in PAMC 15.20.080(A)(3), and for development that is defined as a reasonable use exception under PAMC 15.20.080(A)(I). 2. As conditioned, the proposal will result in the least impact to the sensitive area and take into consideration site constraints associated with the subject property. 3. The Commtmity Development Director concluded that the applicant's environmental information satisfies the requirements of PAMC Sections 15.20.070(B)(4) and 15.20.070(C). 4. The geotechnical reports submitted as a part of the environmentally sensitive areas application provide a basis for conditioning the building activity such that it will be in the public interest, safety, and welfare. 5. The subject property is considered a previously altered area as defined by Chapter 15.20.080(3) PAMC. Development within such areas may be developed subject to criteria (a)-(f) as specified in the Chapter. 6. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan and the City's Zoning, and Environmentally Sensitive Areas Ordinances. Brad IEollins, Director Date Department of Community Development Staff review: Sue Roberds, Assistant Planner cc: Public Works and Engineering Feb O~ 0;~ U4:34p ,~ NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, lNG. UPDATE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Lots I and 2, Block 33 Located in '""'--~' Port Angeles Townsite Clallam County, Washington Prepared for ('~ ROBERT BLOOM Prepared by ~ NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. 717 S. Peabody Street Port Angeles, Washington 98362 January 24, 2002 dCC:~O ~0 10 January 24, 2002 Robert Bloom PO E~x 14'1 Arlington, WA 9B223 Subject: Update geotechnical report for Lots 1 and 2, Block 33, Port Angeles Townsite, Clallam County, VVashington Dear Mr_ Bloom: At your request, Bill Payton of North,~estem Territories, inc. (NTt) conducted a~ update geotechnJcal inspection of the above mentioned property on January 21, 2002. The original report, completed.m September, 1997 (and updated in May 1999) by NTI is included with, and made a part of, this update. It is understood that you plan to construct a four bedroom single family residence on the property as shown on the site plan provided to us by your builder Terhune Homes, LLC (Figure A): This update geotechnical inspection consisted of a visual inspection of the property to determine if there had been any new slide activity since the odginai report. Since the earlier report, improvements have been made to the Francis Street Park east of the subject property, l'he only recent activff¥ noticed since the last report is a smadt area o[ minor Shallow sloughing near the toe of the slope that del:x~ited a small amount of debris onto the new access, stairs leading from the park to the wate~m3nt trail. No springs or seeps were noliced on the slopes. Trees on the slope have curved trunks, which suggest she{{ow sk3pe creep of the surface soils. RegresentatJves of Terhune Homes placed stakes on the property al the corners of the proposed house. Using Figure 1 from the original repo~ and Figure A from this report, rough meast~rements were made in the field of the approx'~mate location of the top of the bluff, and measurements were made from the stakes to the top edge of the bluff. The approximate top of bluff was then drawn on Figure A of this report_ Based on Ihese measurements, the proposed house (not including decks) will sit between 48' and 50' from the marine bluff and between 11' at the northeast comer and 33' at the southeast corner from the Francis Street slope (Figure A)- From the above measurements, it is apparent that the location of the top edge of the Francis Street slope is vedable and that the upland portion ofrhe lot decreases in width in the area of the proposed house. The 4.8' to 50' setback from the rnarine bluff is consistent with the recommendations of the original report and is acceptable. However, the northeast comer of the proposed house is too close to the Francis Street slope, it Js recommended that the location Of the proposed house bo moved soulh, or a combination of west and south, such that the house is no closer than 20' from the top of the Francis S',reet slope, Except as mentioned above, the slopes appear to continue lo be grossly stable and thus the conclusions and ~ecommendations of the o¢lginal report are still valid~ The ~rollowing recommendations should also be considered with regards to .(tevelopment of the subjec~ property: 1. Heavy irrigation or other activities that would contribule large quantities of water to ~e soil should be avoided. One cause of landslides is the presence of excessive groundwater in the soil near the bluff. 2. Bare soils are subject to erosion, thus ground cover should be encouraged and maintained on the slopes as well as on the upland. Native vegetation · that requires litf~e or no irriga~on would be most beneficial. Also, the existing established trees and brush on the slopes provide stabilization and should be le~t in a relatively natural state. Sele~ve thinning and pruning that does not damage the vegetation can be utilized to inlprove the view. 3. Any drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year. 4. Silt fences or other sediment control devices may need to be utilized in order to prevent sedimentation to adjacent properties during construction. For further information please review the three pamphlets, which are enclosed with the original of this report, published by the Washington State Department of Eco/og¥ ent/t~ed: 'Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control Using Vegeta£ion", 'Surface Water and Groundwater on Coastal E~luffs" and ~Vegetation Management.' A Guide for Puget Sound Bluff Property Owners", Limitations This report is based on a visual inspection of the existing sita conditions, barring major catastrophic events such as ear. quakes or abnormal weather conditions. No scientific measurements, tests ~3r calculations were performed. ~'he findings and repor~ are limited (0 the normal standard of care of the industry for an investigation without benefit of scientific data and calc~latio[~S. The sole objective of this investigation has bean to diagnose the geotechnicai conditions at the subject property. The property may be a~ected by regulations pertaining to issues such as weUands or w~ldlife habitat that are not addressed in this report. Fe~ O~ O~ U~:35p The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client in conjunction wi~ the above referenced pro~ect. It may be used by others only with expressed written permission of the Engineer. The report has not been prepared for use by others or for other uses. The observations, interpretations, and conclusions herein are based on generally accepted professional engineering and geologic principles end pra~ice. This warranty is in lieu of all others, either expressed or Jmptied. $inc~erely, NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. 8ill Payton, LEG. Engineefing Geologist F~ 04 g;" U4.;35F, EAST CAROLINE STREET F")'c~ u ~ z A i NOE'HWF. Jl'ERN TERRIIQRES, INC. BLUFF STABILITY REPORT For Lots ! and 2, B~ck 33. Po~t Angetes Towrrs~e Clallam Coup. Washington Report of Findings ~ JOHN H. WOODFORD Rel~rese~tative for the Estate of Lois L. Bowen Prepared By J.R. Jerry Newfln, P.E. NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. 717 South peab0~y Street Port Angeles, Weshiflgton 98632 (360) 452~491 1-800.~54-5545 Updated racy, 1999 BLUFF STABILITY REPORT The subject property consists of two undeveloped city ~ fronting on the north side of the 700 biock of Caroiine StreeL An existing home occupies the property to the west. The east boundary is the parlially developed Francis Street right-of-way which currcn.tly provides p~ng all~ access ~ ~o the Wa~er Front Trail. The focus of this report is the north facing Marine Bluff' along the northerly boundary and the slope along the wast side o1' Francis Street. The purpose of this report is to provide a preliminary evaluation of the stability of the Marine Bluff and the Francis Stree~ slope together with recommendations for development of a single family home on the site. The findings and recommefldattc~s ot this report are p~e{imi~,.ary end must be f~lla~ed by a mom (letailed i~vestigatioa f~ a ~pecE~ h~use plan subject to codes, regulalk~s and permit requirements in force at the time of proc~sed c~nstruction. .THE I~J~INE BUJFF The top edge of the Me, ne Bluff generally follows [he oodherly properly line, eye,aging about 130 feat beck from the southerly property line along Carelir~e StreeL This I~uff drops about 75 feet in elevation to the Wate~onl. Trail below. It has an average slope of 45° based on the profile mapeed by t~ald su~ey near the westedy Ix~ lirm (See Fiojure 1 ~. The face of the bluff was inspected by the unders~ on September 16. 1997 and again on Ma~ 25, 1999. Except for'~e weste~ty cleared ar~a wh~re the p~or~ was taken, the bluff is heavily vegetated wilh brush and trees. It is not a01:~'enl whether this is the result of a recent surrmial slide or was manually cleared. Based on soil togs at the Olympic Memorial-Hospital to the .east. the bluff face is dominanlly glacial till or,lain by 10 to 15 feet of ~ to medium sand. No sigas ef springs or seeps were observed on the bluff face. No evidence of mcan! significant slide activity was obsewed. This is significant in view of the extensive slide ac~ivit~ in this region dudng December 1996 and January 1997. The toe of the bluff is protected f~om erosive wave actioa by the rock rip rap along the Waterfront Trail which was formedy a roilmad bed. In addition, a small ditch between the toe of Ihe blulf ~nd the Waterfront Trai~ prmddes dra~tage along the base of the b~uff. The subject Marine Bluff appears to be ~grossiy stable" and is certainly more stable than other sections to the west thai have slumped due to excessive ground water surfacing at the face of the bluff and/or other causes. FRANCI~ STREET ~LO,~E The top edge of the Francis Street slope is approximately 20 feet west of the easter~ ~ line leaving about 70 feel of generally level ground fronting Caroline Street. This alope is covered by a seiki mass of blackhe~y vires vddch alk~ed very limitad obse~ratio~ of the face o1 this slope. However, based on observations of the Ma~qe g~uff from which ~ Francis Street"cut" slope was created, it could be concluded that ~ slope is as stable as the Marine Bluff. A~ shown in Profile B (See Figure 1) Ibis slope has a sheer drop of about 10 feet verltcally from the to~ edge ~ the~ e~ (aidy uniformly at about 40° to the Fm~c~s Street gra~te below, if should be noted that the height of this slope varies since the subject property along Ute top is neady level and the Francis Street road/trail descends unifomtly to a point just. above the WBterfmnt Trail SETBACK CONSIDERATIONS Standard front (20 feet) and side yard (7 feet) seltmcks per City of'Port Angeles planning a~l building codes would apply for Caroline ~treet f~o~tage and the westerly side yard. Therefore. only the setbacks from the top edge of the Ma~ine Bluff and the Francis Street "cut' slope are subject to fudher evaluation. MARINE BLUFF SETBACKS The final Setback will be a compromise of space available, view potential and risk. ~he maximum setback available tot a 40 foot by 60 foot home with a 20 foot front setback is about 70 feet. The house to the west is abo~ 55 feet back frorn the top edge of Ule Marine Bluff. Although curranUy stable at 45°, a b/pical long term angle of repose of 35' would establish a setback of appmximataty 45 feet for a standard foundation system. A c~oser sea)ack could be justified with an engineered foundation system. Likewise. a tmme with a basement could be deigned to accommodate a 35 foot setback based on the 35° angle of the repose. 2 Feb O~ U~ Oe:3~p p.lO tn condusion, because of the gross steblli~/of the Marine Bluff and the abser~ce of erosive wave ac~ofl at the toe, sethacks fn~t the f. op edge of the Marine Bluff On the order of 35 feet to 45 feet could be jusdfied for conven~onal foundation systems. However, a selbac~. on th~ order of 60 feet to 55 feet wou~d provide an excellent vie~, a mom usable bacl~ yard and less risks. FRANCIS STREET SETBACK Apf~/in9 the same rational as used f~ ff~e Madne Bluff, a 35° angle ~ repose wo~ld resd~ in a sel back of 20 feet at the location of Profile B. Therefore, lhe setback from {he top edge of'the Francis Street slope would be on the order of 20 to 25 feet depending on the hOuse location, basement and other possible factors. cONCt-USIONS 1. The Marina Bluff and the Francis Street Stepe are '9ms,~y stabte'. 2. Curre~y. this is nO active efosion on the face or at the toe of either feature. 3. Approlxtate selbacks from the top edge of these features can be determined by projecling the '~ong term angle of repose' (e.g. 35° fo~ granular material) ~3m the toe of the b~u~slope k) the [nte~Uo~ of the hol~3ntal Ii.action of the boaom of the proposed foundation foolings Mo~e datalied inve~igalion of ~e ~ s~ ~ ~ ~dng a~ f~g ~s ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~e ab~ ~ ~s ~ ~. Mom ~e values of 'a~ of m~se" sh~M be ~s~ on la~ 3. A 10 f~t ~e (~l~m) na~ ve~ve buff~ s~ld'~ 4. Su~ ~m ~, d~ and ~er i~s suE~ ~st ~ ~ ~ d~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s~r ~dl~ ~ ~ an a~ dilate ~nt at ~ ~m of~ ~ff. Feb 04 O~ O4:3Bp p.z~ LIB[rATIONs This report is based on a visual inspection of t~e existing site conditions. No sciefltil~c measorements, tests or calculations were performed. The rmding~ and re~ are limited 1o the normal sl~dan~ of cam of the ind~st~ f~ an investigation without behest of sC~e~fic dat~ a~d The sole objec~e ef Ibis investigation has been to diagnose thegeetechnlcal and/o~ conditions at the site. Except for general informatJort for prospective putchasem, the repolt has been prepared for Ihe exclusive use of John H. Wood/oral a~l the l~mflaser of the properly and may be used by others only with expressed written i~w~nissien of the Engineer. The mpo~ has not be~m prepar~l for use by ~ or ofber uses. The observations, th~eq)relattons, and coaclasinas herein e~e based oa generally accepted professional e~§inee~ing and geologic principles and i~raclice_ This warranty is in lieu of all ofhem, ellher expressed or imptied. 4 .~1:,\::C!20,0~c,92f'- qL~~F;'I_<:::_.~"I_RING INC 360 6~~?. 3680 P_Ol tj ~ CJnIK'l."L.ll~ rNl.'" o..tet...n._.. ~.. -.---. t>-"Clli'N'''''<''I: n-~:___ ELECTRICAL PERMIT APPLICATION Thg EiK:tIil::al PS1TT\/1 AppIQbon must be filled t)Uf eomDk!re{w. Pl.... ~ or reprint in ink. It VOIl 1UI_ Iny qu.atIOfTl. plene 1:<<11 (380. 417....,35 Fa number: (360) 4'7-4711 City: ARLINGTON, WA. l?J.l.1;1rW1 31 ORU EJ'/ 31 /03 Ci",:SILVERDALE, WA. PM,J:60-692-0134FB~60-692-3680 1',...",.,3&0-435-0755 Zip~ 82 2 3 3~92-0134 Zip98383 PAT GRIEB Owner o. Eloc. ConlractOl AQenI: Propel1yOwn6r: ROBERT & NANCY BLOOM A_;P,O. BOx 141 El<<lrtcalCon_to,OLYMPIC WIRING INC. A~M":9601 PROVOST RD. N.W. INSTALLATION WIRED B~' :. J OWNER lUELECTI'lICAL CONTflACTOR CrtlditCard Holl1erNsme: WILLIAM OR JUDI'rH CARTER/OLYMPIC WIRING, INC BlI/lngAddress: 9601 PROVOST RD. NW CIty: Sn~E~~ALE Zip: 98383 Credit Card Numbs" VlSA:_ MC:~ PROJECT AllOFniSS: 727 EAST CAROLINE STREET TYPE OF WORK: Chack alllhat apply: ;Q(New o Meralion/Addition x:.i<:l1esidenlal C Mulli-tamlly C Commercial U Mabile Horn. Sq. Ft. 2, 202 :..: Remme Mew 0 Delached garage ::.: HOI Tub Q Swim Pool lJ Septic Pump K) Low Vottage XXTelecorn. 0 Sign Number of Circuits a~ded 0< oheTed: DESCflIPTIONOFTHEELI!CTflICALPflOJECT: 2,202 SQ. FT. S.P.R. WITH A/V__& SECURITY n Baseboard lU:Furnace y:yHeat Pump 'I.l-Fon.Won _KW -4l- KW _KW 2 TON _KW l.! Overhead Serv1c:8 ::JTemp SeNice rXUnde'!l<ound Sorvice TO O.H. POLE 5c.J!. ;/3.ru Service !nlonnollon t. (). __.3. '1 . i b 1S'J...9o Vollage: 2.40 ~.._........_-_._.- Phase: ~ 1 "' J Servico Sil.., 2 0-0-- Foed.r Sileo A i Q Electrlcal Heallaad Addl1lons PAMC '4.05.060(9): For industrial. tommcrcial. & residential projElCts Iarge( than a duplex, a one. line draWIng or 11'1'8 EI<<:lrical Serviclil & Fettders, building size (sq. fl), load calculaliOfls, and the rype & of cooouctOfS an~or 1ll~8'Way II!t reqLllred and shall accompany ttle Electric:aJ ?orm;l apPlicabon. , horeby csrtify that' have read and examined this application and Ir/lClW that same to be /rue and CO/7'f3Ct. and / rstand it is nol /he Ciry's lega/ responsibiliry to determine what permits are requillKl; it rem4ins the 4pplictlnts responsibility to .determine what permits <Jre required and /0 obtain such. PW.9019 c...."''''"__.....~, F/::t ~ .,._M_..........~ .. . . n ~ 1'1-..z;:;:; Lv- b Ir;fi~ I .... . p. ~-~ W"tGAi 'i{ t+P ~'X!, - ~~V tW:-<!. _. . t.r 'TCux. 1AJl't( bQ c.~VQ? '1, iz1 c.A~cft_ Q"vt XfM., r 'f --l)"t........ Date: S- /'1- 02.- Dale: S - 1<1- tJ z.. ELECTRICAL PERMIT CITY OF PORT ANGELES 360417-4735 'Application Number . . . . . 18-00001205 Date 8/02/18 Application pin number . . . 786165 Propqrty Address . . . . . . 727 CAROLINE ST "ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 06 -30 -00 -5 -1 -3300 -0000 - Application type description ELECTRICAL ONLY Subdivision Name . . . . . . Property Use . . . . . . . . Property Zoning . . . . . . . RS7 RESDNTL SINGLE FAMILY Application valuation . . . . 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Application desc Security system ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Owner Contractor ------------------------ ------------------------ BLOOM ROBERT D/NANCY_ PROTECT YOUR HOME PO BOX 141 3750 PRIORITY WAY SOUTH DRIVE ARLINGTON WA 98.2230141 #200 INDINAPOLIS IN 46240 (317) 810-4720 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit . . . . . ELECTRICAL ALTER RESIDENTIAL Additional desc . . Permit Fee . . . . 64.00 Plan Check Fee .00 Issue Date . . . . 8/02/18 Valuation . . . . 0 Expiration Date . . 1/29/19 Qty Unit Charge Per Extension 1.00 64.0000 BCH EL -SINGLE CIR LIMITED RES 64.00 --------------=------------------------------------------------------------- Fee summary Charged Paid Credited Due ----------------- ---------- ---- ------- ---- ----- Permit Fee Total 64.00 64.00 .00 .00 Plan Check Total .00 .00 .00 .00 Grand Total 64.06 64.00 .00 .00 INSPECTION TYPE DITCH SERVICE ROUGH -IN FINAL COMMENTS: DATE: RESULTS: I f - PERMIT WILL EXPIRE SIX (6) MONTHS FROM LAST INSPECTION REPORT STATE SALES TAX on your excise tax form to the City of Port Angeles (Location Code 0502) INSPECTOR-- Signature NSPECTOR: Signature of opener. or Electrical Contractor X Date: CITY OF PORT ANGELES PERMIT APPLICATION Building Division/Electrical Inspections NS (, tri; 321 East Fifth Street —P.O. Box 1150 / Port Angeles Washington, 98362 Ph: (360) 4174735 Fax: (360) 417-4711 Data. 08/01/18 X 1 & 2 Single Family Dwelling V ' Flan Review May Be Required, Please Complete Beet ical Ran Review Infomredion Sheet .kbAdjess: 727 Carohne St Basing SqL— F001W 1804 sq. ft. DeswipSmdatime Installation of a low voltane home secuntv system Qmw Information Contractor information Nancv Bloom Narfe: Protect Your Home NhiirgAdIM& 727 Caroline St Wdk g Adliess 3750 Priority Way S Dr W. Port Angeles Stak WA Tja 98362 W. Indianaoofs Sfel(K IN 7qX 46240 PIKIR 3604521108 Foc WA Rj 1 8865023559 FjpC 3175642547 Lust #1E)r WA LkWMy/Ej(p PROTEYH934RS Rem Unit 21 Total (thy tuWtfoiied by Lht C wwr Servi0e"Feed8r2WAm1 $120.00 $ SeMce'Feeda201-400 Anp. $146.00 $ Servio/Feede401-600An $205OD $ Servfoe+Feeda 601-1000 Amp. $ 26200 $ SeMcedFeederoier 1000Arrp. $31300 $ 1 -x:h 0rug W Service Feeder $ S.OD $. 846 . nzrt S alnce Feeder fiaoo EwhAddibaiei&and,CUait $ 500 $ Brardl emits 1-4 $ 75.00 $ Twp. Se oW Feeder 270 Amp. $ 93.OD $ Tenp. SeMw`Feedw201A00AnTL $110.00 $ Temp. SeMmFeeder401-600Arrp. $148.00 $ Tarp. Sev MFeeder60i-1000Arrp . $16500 $ PtlM to Poft I ob* $ 9500 $ 9" OraAN Lhited EheV -1 & 2 Fenny DAef ing $ 64.00 1 $ $6400 klenthaduied Fb eComectitn $120.00 $ Plemmede8edricalEtwW-5KVA—%AentxLess $lop 00 $ Them,ostat $ 5500 $ Note: x.00 far eactl addtiaA TSlet bF_WCD� RLICn0NMLY: -First 1300 Sgtnre FL $12000 $ Each Addtitnal 500 Sgtere Ft, or Portion of $ 40:00 $ Each OAhtilang or Detadted Gerage $ 74.00 $ Each 3nin rung Phos or Hat Ttb $110.00 _ _ $ $ !!4 00 Tb1at 0Aner as defined by R0N.192B261: (1) OAner Will ooaipy the stnxlure for two years after this electrical pearit is finalized. (2) OAner is Wired to hire an electrical contractor if above said property is for sale, rend or lease. Remit e)ires after six m3ft of last inspection. After reetitg fhe abode staternetd, I hereby certifythat I an the owrner of ffne above named property o a iloersed elecMcal Dantractor. i am meldng ft electrical installation or alteration in oortpirarnra With the electrical laws, PIEC., NC VV, Chapter 1928, WAC. C7napter 296468, The City of Pod Angeles Minicipal Coder and Utility Speificeliors and PARC 1405 050 regarding Bectrical Permt Applications. Signature of owner, electrical contractor or electrical administrator: 0 casr1 R o,6dt ® QedB Cardit �c 08/01/18 X .cQ oelaa: 01MM12 ELECTRICAL PERMIT INSPECTION TYPE DATE: RESULTS: INSPECTOR: DITCH SERVICE ROUGH -IN FINAL ICONDVIENTS: PERMIT WILL EXPIRE SIX (6) MONTHS FROM LAST INSPECTION Sighatt* of owner or ElecWcal Contractor X Date: CITY OF PORT ANGELES 360-417-4735 Application Number . . . . . 18-00001205 Date 8/02/18 Application pin number . . . 786165 Property Address . . . . . . 727 CAROLINE ST - REPORT STATE SALES -TAX ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER:- 06 -30 -00 -5 -1 -3300 -0000 - on excise tax form Application type description ELECTRICAL ONLY your Subdivision Name . . . . . . t0 the City ©f Port Angeles, Property Use (Location Code 0502) Property Zoning . . . . . . . RS7 RESDNTL• SINGLE FAMILY. Application valuation . . . . 0 ----------------------------------------------------- Application desc ----- --- ---- Security system ------------------------7--------------------------------------------------- Owner Contractor ------------------------ BLOOM ROBERT D/NANCY ------------------------ PROTECT YOUR HOME PO BOX 141 3750 PRIORITY WAY SOUTH DRIVE ARLINGTON WA 982230141 #200 INDINAPOLIS IN 46240 (317) 810-4720 ------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Permit . . . . . . ELECTRICAL ALTER RESIDENTIAL Additional desc . Permit Fee . . , . 64.00 Plan Check Fee .00 Issue Date . . . . 8/02/18 Valuation . . . . 0 Expiration Date 1/29/19 Qty Unit Charge Per Extension 1.00 64.0000 ECH EL -SINGLE CIR LIMITED RES 64.00 ---------------------7------------------------------------------------------ Fee summary Charged Paid Credited Due ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------------- Permit Fee Total 64.00 64.00 .00 .00 Plan Check Total .00 .00 .00 .00 Grand Total 64.00 64.00 .00 .00 INSPECTION TYPE DATE: RESULTS: INSPECTOR: DITCH SERVICE ROUGH -IN FINAL ICONDVIENTS: PERMIT WILL EXPIRE SIX (6) MONTHS FROM LAST INSPECTION Sighatt* of owner or ElecWcal Contractor X Date: