Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout200 N Oak St - Building NO. 992 CITY OF PORT ANGELES DETERMiNATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE RCW Chapter 197-11-340 Description of Proposal: A shoreline Conditional Use for the construction of a combination hotel, conference center, restaurant and lounge. The project will be in one building, 55 feet in height (four stories), and an architectural feature to 66 feet in total height. The project will include associated parking, for 127 vehicles on-site and 91 spaces off-site. Extension of the City's Waterfront Trail will cross the site following a route along the shoreline. A land exchange between the Port of Port Angeles and Washington State Department of Natural Resources will be processed such that the proposal is entirely on Port property. Location of Proposal (including street address, if any): 201 W. Front Street, also known as that portion of first class Tidelands Block 2 and Block 2A, Port Angeles Tidelands West of Laurel Street, Clallam County, Washington described as follows: Tidelands Block 2A as shown on survey recorded May 3, 2002 under Auditor's File Number 2002-1084452 and filed in Volume 49 of Surveys, Page 50, Records of Clallam County, Washington. Port Angeles, Washington 98362 APPLICANT: Randal Jay Ehm, Ehm Architecture Lead Agency: CITY OF PORT ANGELES The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (ELS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental assessment and checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [XX] This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date of issuance. Comments must be submitted by July 12, 2002~ at which time the DNS may be retained, modified, or withdrawn. [ ] There is no comment period for this DNS. [ ] This DNS is issued per WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period. June28,2002 ~//?c¢~, ~? /'~;7~ Date Craig D. Knutson, Acting City Manager Responsible Official: Brad Collins, Director, Port Angeles Department of Community Development, 321 East Fifth Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362, phone (360) 417 - 4750. Pub: July 1, 2002 Post: June28,2002 Mail: June 28, 2002 (fax) WESTECH COMPANy ENVI ~,ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR: OAK STRE] ~ HOTEL AND CONFERENCE CENTER P 3RT ANGELES, WASHINGTON May 2002 Submitted to: CITY OF PORT ANGELES 321 East Fifth Street Port Angeles, Washington 98362 Submitted by: WESTECH COMPANY P.O. Box 2876 Port Angeles, Washington 98362 CiTY OF PORT ANGELES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P.O. Box 2876 ' Po~ Angel~, W~lngton 98362' Telephone:. (360) 452.0186' Fax: (360) 452-4118 · ~m:~'l~ bshca@~,~ for~rard.com ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR: OAK STREET HOTEL AND CONFERENCE CENTER PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON May 2002 Submitted to: CITY OF PORT ANGELES 321 East Fifth Street Port Angeles, Washington 98362 Submitted by: WESTECH COMPANY P.O. Box 2876 Port Angeles, Washington 98362 CONTEI~ITS 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Site Background 1 1.2 Proposed Project 1 1.3 Site Alternatives 1 2.0 Approach and Methods 3 3.0 Environmental Checklist and Assessment 4 A. Background 4 B. Environmental Elements 6 C. Signature 27 4.0 Discussion, Conclusions and Recommendations 28 5.0 References 29 6.0 Figures 31 Figure 1. Vicinity Map 32 Figure 2. Site Plan 33 Figure 3. Stormwater Facilities 34 7.0 Tables 35 Table 1. Estimated Personnel During Construction and Operation 36 Table 2. Current Traffic Counts (2001) 37 WT785PAC. ENV/050902 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 SITE BACKGROUND The Site is a 3.81 acre area consisting of two parcels of land. One parcel (approximately 1.95 acres is owned by the Port of Port Angeles, while the other (roughly 1.86 acres) is ~..~.~ leased to the Port by the Washington Department of Natural Resources. The Site lies west of Oak Street and north of Front Street near the western edge of downtown Port Angeles. To the west lies the newly restored Valley Creek Estuary. West of this are K-Plyand other ~ ;{vV~,,~,yindustrial%' -?.,¢' and commercial properties. Avariety of commercial properties are located tothe ~,,o~,. ~)~.east and south of the proposed project. -~*'Y~;¥~ ;~.~'r)The Site was once used as a log storage yard. More recently a portion of it has been used for extended stay public parking, particularly for the Victoria Ferries. The land west of the Site was also previously a log yard, but has been restored by local civic organizations (mainly Soroptomists International) as an estuary, the month of Valley Creek. 1.2 PROPOSED PROIECT The proposed Hotel/Conference Center is a 150 room facility with 11,000 square feet of j, conference center space (sized to hold conferences of 600-700 persons). The proposed · . . building will be a four floor structure with a maximum building height of 42 feet. Parking will be provided on-site for approximately 125 vehicles. Off-site parking will be provided nearby for approximately 235 additional vehicles. Site plans, floor plans and elevations have been prepared by Ehm Architecture and have been submitted to the City of Port Angeles, where they can be reviewed by the public. 1.3 SITE ALTERNATIVF~ The Site is one of the few sites which are currently not developed and which would accommodate the required capacity. Other potential sites would be less desirable for business and marketing purposes. There is a large site, formerly a log storage area east of the Daishowa mill. This site is large but is next to a large industrial site and is a considerable distance away from the downtown core (nearly a mile). Another potential site for future development is the Rayonier Site, however, this site is not expected to be available for five or more years due to necessary environmental cleanup. Other sites might be available on the west side of Port Angeles, along Highway 101, however, these sites would not offer the same amenities or access to downtown as the Oak Street Site. WT785PAC.ENV/050902 ~ On-site alternatives would include alternative parking structures to solve potential parking problems. This could include a parking garage across Oak Street from the Site, or parking below the facility itself. Due to the low elevation of the Site, feasibility studies would be necessary if the latter possibility were pursued. Parking solutions which minimize on-site parking requirements could improve amount of landscape space, open space or public access and recreational area (e.g. near the waterfront trail). WT785PAC. ENV/050902 2 2.0 APPROACH AND METHODS This Environmental Assessment has been prepared through research of existing data and reports obtained from local agencies including the City of Port Angeles, Clallam County, and state and federal agencies. Data and reports were not available from the Port of Port Angeles, however a phone interview was obtained from the Port Director. Figures were prepared from standard area maps. Figure 3 was prepared from a stormwater facilities map provided by Northwestern Territories, Inc., the Civil Engineers designing this aspect of the project. Table I was prepared from data estimates from Ehm Architecture. Table 2 was prepared from data provided by the City of Port Angeles. WT785PAC. ENV/050902 3 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND ASSESSMENT 1. Name of Proposed Project: Port Angeles Hotel and Conference Center 2. Name of Applicant: Randall Ehm, Ehm Architecture 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Randall Ehm, Ehm Architecture, 1016 W. Washington Street, San Diego, CA92103. 4. Date Checklist prepared: May 9, 2002 5. Agency Requesting Checklist: City of Port Angeles, Department of Community Development 6. Proposed timing of schedule (including phasing): Assuming permits obtained by end of July 2002, Construction Commencing August 2002 through May 2003, with occupancy June 2003. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Surveying and Civil Engineering (including stormwater control, drainage, utilities etc. has been prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc. (NTI 2002) Geotechnical work is being undertaken by PacRim Geotechnical (PRG 2002). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal. If yes, explain. v// No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval by Port of Port Angeles. Shoreline Development Permit approval by City of Port Angeles. Approval by Department of Natural Resources. WT785PAC. ENV/050902 4 11. Give brief, complete demription of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. The project as defined is to construct a 150 room hotel and an 11,000 square foot convention center on a parcel of land north of Front Street and west of Oak Street along the Port Angeles waterfront. The land is currently owned by the Pon of Pon Angeles, with a portion of the property under state ownership, administered by the Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Construction of the project would involve the purchase of the property from the Port of Port Angeles, a exchange of equal sized land parcels with DNR(estimated 15,600 square feet based on current design) and a subsequent lease of land from DNR for parking for the facility. The structure itself would be built entirely on land owned by the Pon following the property exchange. Conceptual details of the exchange and the purchase have been worked out with the Port and DNR. /The proposed building will be four stories in height at a maximum height of 42 feet. The l¢41st floor will contain a lobby, cafe/lounge, a restaurant, supporting space (mechanical, laundry,storage, rest rooms, linen storage, staff offices etc.), an 11,000 square foot ~,l~Vconference center, an exercise/training room and an indoor pool. The second and third floors each contain about 50 rooms and a guest service area. The third floor also contains a deck area on the east side. The fourth floor contains about 50 rooms plus an upseale bistro/lounge. .~V°~On-site parking will be provided as per Port Angeles City Code. Some off-site mrking will ('aaalso. be provided at a nearby location. Present plans call for approximately ~total' on- s~te parking spaces. The developer is currently investigating feasibility for below ground parking under the facility, off-site parking at an adjacent lot, or possibly constructing a parking garage. ~.**'Environmental and engineering studies for the facility are on-going at this time. sGtl~2rha~icaltabii~t;Stleg;t2°~d (aPa;~ofitCechRin~c)al h~;obrteewnll~°b;dUpCr~pdar2t~cl~lnd~ngsu;emS:tt:~r;sO atlnlde review. Similarly a Drainage Plan and related civil engineering studies is being prepared by licensed civil engineers (Northwestern Territories, Inc.) and will be similarly circulated. 12. Location of the proposal: Shoreline property within the City of Port Angeles, located west of Oak Street and noah of Front Street and east of the Valley Creek Estuary Site (see Figures 1-3). WT785PAC.ENV/050902 ~ ~ B. EI~/IRO~ME~ ELEMEN'I~ 1. EARTH a. General description of the Site (Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The Site is topographically level. It is a shoreline site bordering Port "/ Angeles Harbor and is at a mean elevation of approximately 13.7 to 16.7 feet msl. The Site lies roughly 7-8 feet above mean high water (at elevation 5.92). To the south, the City of Port Angeles slopes up gradually for a distance of about 500 feet to the base of a steep bluff 50-60 feet in height. Slope of the hillside is in excess of 100 percent slope in some places. b.What is the steepest slope on the Site (approximate percent slope)? The site is entirely at less than 2 percent slope. c. What general types of soils are found on the Site (clay, sand, gravel, peat muck)? Note classification of agricultural soils (if any?) and note any prime farmland. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service mapping (SCS 1987) shows the Site to be within an area of Elwha-Clallam-Catla soils, which are shallow to moderately deep moderately well drained soils found on hills. Specifically, the mapping shows the Site to be within soil unit #3, classified as "beaches", gravelly, cobbly and sandy areas subject to wave action during major storms and generally unvegetated. Due to the placement of fill and riprap along the shoreline, the Site has been historically altered. The surface soils are fill material and the Site is largely protected from wave action by the riprap seawall. The surface soils on the site are imported compact fill material. This material is medium to dense gravelly-sand or sandy gravel material (PacRim Geotechnical 2002). Geotechnical borings taken at several locations show that the surface material is underlain by marine deposits (medium to dense silty sand intermixed with wood and shell fragments) below the existing fill to depths of approximately 38-40 feet. This material is underlain by very dense glacial deposits (very dense silty sand or sandy silt with gravel) ( PacRim Geotechnical 2002). WT785PAC.ENV/050902 6 ~ There are no soils on the site that are agriculturally suited, nor are there any soils which would constitute prime farmland. There are no wetland soils on the site, although the fill material appears to have been placed within historic wetlands as is much of the shoreline portion of Port Angeles. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. ~Geotechnical investigations and physical testing of drilled soils indicates that the fill and marine deposits may be prone to some settling or compression and that the proposed structure should therefore be supported on piles which would extend into the glacial deposits to depths of about 45 feet (PacRim Geotechnical 2002). e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No fill is expected to be necessary. Grading of the Site will be limited to preparation of the Site for foundations since the Site is already level. Piles will be driven into the fill and marine sediment material and will not require additional grading. Final grading will be conducted prior to paving of parking areas. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion could occur during grading due to stockpiling of soil. The Site is nearly level and erosion hazard is slight provided that prudent erosion/sediment control measures are employed to control discharge to the Strait. If construction occurs past October 15, it is recommended that the parking area be paved with a primary layer of asphalt to limit erosion/sedimentation and control mud/ and or dust during the construction process. This plus placement of erosion control measures (hay bales, silt fences, netting) between the construction area and the shoreline is expected to adequately control erosion. WT785PAC.ENV/050902 7 g. About what percent of the Site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example asphalt or buildings)? ~/Approximately 75-85 percent of the site will be covered with impervious surface (building, sidewalks and asphalt parking areas) following completion of construction. The remainder of the area is expected to be landscaped with native or approved ornamental plants. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: f~' - The major recommended erosion control method would be placing a ~0~, primary asphalt coating over the proposed parking areas prior to 5,~ construction. This would be particularly important if construction is ' ,cJb~ to continue through fall and winter months as planned. ~v~v'~-~u~\~9"rCj~'~ Additional erosion control should include extension of the existing silt fence to the eastern and western sides of the Site. Jute netting, straw bales or other soil stabilization measures should be used on areas ~/ which will be uncovered for substantial periods of time. Landscape /~ areas sh°uld be c°vered with n°n-er°dible materials until vegetati°n can be planted. These procedures are expected to minimize erosion and to eliminate potential sedimentation of the nearby shoreline area. In the event that a new stormwater discharge point is needed, this should be constructed only during dry summer months (preferably July through September). Breaching of the tiptop and installation of the storm discharge drain should be done in as minimal time as possible, preferably during a low tide cycle to minimize sedimentation. An Erosion Control plan keyed to the design and construction of the discharge pipe should be prepared prior to installation. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, the most likely air quality impacts would be dust from construction vehicles moving on the site and vehicle emissions. Vehicle emissions can be expected to be mainly from diesel engines, a mixture mainly composed of particulates and hydrocarbon gases. ENV/050902 8 Dust can be reduced by wetting of soils one to three times per day, or by paving the site with a preliminary layer of asphalt. If paving is not done, a water source should be made available at the site for wetting (hoses connected to City water or a water truck). Upon completion, the project would result in additional automobile emissions (delivery trucks, passenger cars and light trucks). The project is anticipated to require parking for up to 360 vehicles at a time. Pollution from those vehicles will be added to ambient air when those vehicles are in use on or near the Site. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Off-site emissions from K-ply and from Daishawa America may affect the Site to some extent. These emissions include a variety of particulate and gaseous air pollutants and may periodically generate odors at the Site. No monitoring of the area has been conducted and concentrations of pollutants or consequent effects on human health or the environment are unknown. Both facilities are expected to be generally in compliance with emission permits, however, no air quality measurements or modelling has been conducted. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: All construction machinery should be well tuned prior to use. The Site should be regularly watered (water truck present on or near Site) if not paved prior to construction. Alternative methods of transportation to and from the Site should be explored as feasible, however, these are not expected to be particularly successful since hotel/conference center users will generally travel to Port Angeles via private automobile or via commercial airline (to William Fairchild International Airport). Shuttle service to and from the airport during conferences could reduce the amount of private automobiles and hence air pollution to a minor extent. WT785PAC. ENV/050902 9 3. WATER a. Surface Water 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the Site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Site is adjacent to Port Angeles Harbor, an embayment within the Strait of Juan de Fuca on the north. To the west is the Valley Creek Estuary, a restored creek mouth for Valley Creek. Port Angeles Harbor is a tidal, meso-haline water body. 2. Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 fee0 of the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The project will require work within 200 feet of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The proponent will apply for a Shoreline Development Permit for the work. 3. Estimate the amount of fill or dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredge material will be placed in surface waters or wetlands. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. No direct surface water withdrawals or diversions will be made. The project will utilize City water. City water at present is pumped from the Elwha River, so water use by the project will constitute an indirect increase in surface water withdrawals from the Elwha as do all City projects requiring water use. WT785PAC.ENV/050902 ~o 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) produced by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) indicate that the Site lies within Flood Zone C, or an area of minimal potential flooding (FEMA 1990). The Site does impound some water due to its nearly fiat topography. Parking and landscape areas should be carefully sloped toward storm drains to prevent inadvertent creation of small water features on the Site. ~9,~t,~r' 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to 6~/f t~ surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and o>~'~ ~ ~°~i~ anticipated volume of discharge. °>~Jfg"~zt~- of~-~f~ No. No water materials will be discharged directly to surface '-~4~/-'¢ ~/~f~' , b'fr~ -~/f---- waters. Sanitary waste from the project will be directed to .4V ~'~k~",t3 ~3.~'~ I~~/ Citysewers and pumpod to the existing City sewage treatment · .t~- v 'F~// ~' facilities. Stormwater will be gathered via a drainage system, ~ ~cgo' /t/~ _,,~'~ routed to catchbasins and discharged to the Harbor (Figure 3). -- :~o'1~/,,_,.|"~'~ b. Ground Water ~,,~,.kg ~ 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water7. Give general description, purpose, and /'/d/ '~/ approximate quantities if known. No use of or discharge to groundwater is anticipated. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial; containing the following chemicals; agricultural etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No discharge to ground sources is anticipated. The project will discharge sanitary waste to the City Sewage Treatment Plant which discharges to the outer harbor following secondary treatment of effluent. It will discharge excess stormwater to the Harbor as described above. WT785PAC. ENV/050902 n Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater will be collected by a Stormwater Collection System designed by a qualified Civil Engineer. Stormwater on the site will be directed toward storm drains with catchbasins and pollution control tees. From them stormwater will flow to a centralized collection area where it will pass through an oil- water separator or a CDSpollution control system (Continuous Deflective Separation). Either the individual catchbasins or the main collection line will be fitted with oil/water separators to trap hydrocarbon pollutants. Following pollution control, stormwater will be discharged to the Harbor. There ~s an existing stormwater discharge point which currently serves Oak Street and Railroad Avenue located at the northeastern comer of the Site. Another existing discharge from Front Street flows into the Valley Creek Estuary. The project may use a new discharge at the northwestern comer of the Site (see Figure 3), since the City ~nd other agencies will j not allow discharge into the Estuary. However, if the Oak- Railroad discharge can be used, project flows could be routed to this point, eliminating the need for shoreline construction of an additional discharge. This will be determined by the design engineer in consultation with the City Engineer. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Sanitary waste will be pumped to the City's waste treatment facility where it will be treated. Stormwater will be treated by detention and oil/water separators. Solid waste will be removed from the Site by regular trash collection services provided by the City. Restaurant waste will be treated as necessary prior to discharge to the sewers. WT785PAC.ENV/050902 ~2 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impacts, if any: ~,~d~,~ Proper design of the Drainage Plan will be the major mitigation ~ -9 3t~ .. -.,~ measure for stormwater. Detention of stormwater would reduce large , ,~'~. bb¢ ~t~.~, sediment particles, particularly during construction. The City should -~ ~gvW'~ .tv~0 .~~5~ ensure that the sewer hookups used serve only separate sanitary /.~'~'. ~' 'a,o; r,. 6o~,- sewers (there are still a few combined sanitary/stormwater sewers in -~ ~ '~,' ~ the downtown area). ,/.,:~,~4~d- a. Check types of vegetation found on the site: , ~y Ao At present, there is no significant vegetation on the Site. There is a qve-/v~,~ ~\~'~. small amount of grass which was planted by local volunteers to help ~ r-~ ~ "· stabilize the soil in connection with the Valley Creek Estuary project. Deciduous trees (alder, maple, aspen, other): None present. Evergreen Trees (fir, cedar, pine, other): None present. Shrubs: None present. Grasses: Limited cover of introduced (planted) grass species. Pasture: None present. Crop or grain: None present. Wet soil plants: (Cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other): The Site itself does not contain wetland plants. A few of these plants are re-establishing themselves in the adjacent estuary. Water plants: (water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other): None present on the Site. There are aquatic plants, including nearby eelgrass beds at various locations in the Harbor offshore from the Site. Other types of vegetation: None present WT785PAC. ENV/050902 13 b. What type and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Since there is no significant vegetation present except for a thin grass cover, there will be no significant vegetation removal. It will be important to re-establish vegetation cover with grass or other plantings to control erosion, unless the area is otherwise covered prior to and during construction (e.g. paving). c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the Site. There are no threatened or endangered plant species on or near the Site. Eelgrass colonies have undergone somewhat of a decline in recent years in local waters, however, these species are not listed as threatened or endangered at this time. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the Site, if any: The Site will be landscaped following construction. The landscaping will emphasize native species of plants wherever possible. Other ornamental species, particularly shrubs and trees will be used in some locations where applicable and desirable. ANIMALS a. Check any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the Site or are known to be on or near the Site: Birds: (hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other): Seagulls occasionally have been observed to utilize the Site. Very little habitat exists for other birds, however, it is probably used occasionally used by other species. Fish (bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, othe0: Coho salmon are present in the waters adjacent to the Site. Steelhead trout are also known to be present in these waters. The North Olympic Peninsula ,~d Salmon Habitat Recovery Lead Entity (NOPLE2001) lists both stocks as "declining" and/or "depressed". NOPLE lists chum salmon as ~'1/ extirpat~l from the urban watersheds in Port Angeles Harbor and cutthroat trout as "unknown" in these watersheds. Pink salmon were WT785PAC.ENV/050902 also present in the Harbor in the 1960's but may be presently extirpated (Shea et al. 1981). Shellfish including a variety of hardshell and softshell clams, Pacific oysters, shrimp and Dungeness Crab are found in the Harbor and nearby waters. Other fish species include English sole, Pacific herring, surf smelt, prickleback, as well as several species of perch, greenling, sanddab, poacher and sculpin. Marine Resources: Potential effects of the project on nearshore biological organisms is impo~a~t, This could include effects of the project on the recently emplaced Valley Creek Estuary. There may be opportunities for mitigation related to improvement of the estuary or the shoreline north of the facility. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the Site. ~/ ~ There are no threatened or endangered terrestrial or aquatic species ~.~d~ ~h5 on the Site, nor is there any habitat for such species. The marine A 'd' ~ ~ waters of the Harbor contain several species of salmonids some of ~'Jl ~(;~r. .~ which have stocks listed as Threatened in the Puget Sound area. The ~). o ~.- '~ 02ox''' NOPLE does not list any Threatened stocks specifically known to ~x~,,~. ~~. . [}.~. ..... occur in Port Angeles Harbor (NOPLE2001). ~ )qC;' ,~a i ~, .,,~ The City of Port Angeles prepared a Shoreline Habitat Assessment for ~"~ ,.~ ~r~r~,)j~,\~, ,-' Port Angeles Harbor (Pentec 2001). This study placed the Project ~ ~ ~ ,~-~ 'v Site in Zone 6, which received a salmonid habitat rating of 6.6 for . ,~)" , x ~" ~\e chinook salmon and 9.4 for coho salmon and bull trout based on a ~O'"~ ~ ~'~ ~ scale of 25. The rating was probably an average of a lower rating for ~,,v~'' ~ the riprapped Site area combined with a higher rating for the newly restored Valley Creek Estuary. Other sites in the Harbor ranged from .~/ a low of 0.7 (at the Daishowa Pulpmill) to a high of 15.3 at the end ~,~ ;-,d/ of Ediz Hook (at the Coast Guard Station). ~"~' "~'r~ c. Is the Site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The Site itself is not part of any migration route. The waters adjacent to the Site serve as a migration route for salmonids to the Valley Creek system or to other independent drainages urban in the Harbor. WT785PAC. ENV/050902 15 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: ~/Several possible mitigation measures are available to preserve or ,/ ~( .~Fj~'~ ;'~ enhance fish and wildlife. These would include enhancement of the ~.~ .~-~o,v/~~ Valley Creek Estuary (for instance establishment of wetlands)or enhancement of shoreline resources. The proponent has not proposed any of these measures at this time since if construction is pursued carefully, including control of erosion and sedimentation, significant impacts to these resources are not expected to occur. ENERGYAND NATURALRESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing etc. The construction phase of the project will consume fuels for vehicles (gasoline and diesel) and possibly marine craft (barges may be used to transport the modules used in construction of the hotel). The ( operation of the project will consume electricity for heating and ~l~~ lighting as well as appliances and communications. The electric 1~2g~ energy for the project will be supplied by Port Angeles City Light. b. Would the project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. No nearby properties appear to utilize solar energy. Shadowing effects of the building are not expected to strongly affect properties to the east or south due to distance of the Site from those properties. c What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans \\ of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: ~- -- ~-.~'~tt.&\\ Standard building code features for commercial facilities will be used q¥ in the project. These include insulated windows and properly ~ insulated walls, floors and roofs according to the Uniform Building Code for commercial structures. Efficient heating systems should be researched by the proponent in order to reduce both costs and energy use over the lifetime of the facility. WT785PAC.ENV/050902 ~62~ 7. ENVIRON-MENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The Port of Port Angeles has conducted a Phase I Study of the Site (to determine potential threats from hazardous substances) and has engaged a firm to conduct limited chemical sampling of soils and cores which were drilled by the geotechnical engineers. At this time, the Port has not made these studies available for review. The Port Director, Clyde Boddy indicated in a telephone conversation that the Phase I report did not reveal any significant problems with contamination, however, this cannot be independently verified since these reports are not available. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. During construction there is some chance ofaccidem, requiring use of emergency medical facilities, as with any construction project. No significant use of hazardous substances is expected at the facility. During operation of the facility, no significant increased risks are anticipated, although fire is a possible hazard as with any structure. The City will provide fire protection services for the facility. Required fire flows will be designed into the project by a licensed civil engineer and these flows will be approved by the City according to specifications of the Fire Department. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Other than fire flow design (discussed above), no significant impacts have been identified and thus no mitigation measures are necessary. WT785PAC. ENV/050902 17 b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The primary source of noise near the project will be traffic along Front Street and to a lesser extent along Oak Street. There will also be some noise effects from log storage operations at K-Ply. Marine activities in the harbor may also cause occasional noise from marine engines, fishing boat unloading at the pier on the property and related activities. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the Site. The project will cause local noise levels to increase during construction. Construction hours should be limited to normal daylight hours (between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM if possible. During operation, the traffic using the Site will cause increased noise levels. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The project will be built with sound insulated building materials, particularly on the side of the building toward the industrial property to the west. This should include sound insulating windows. Except during construction, the project is not expected to significantly impact nearby receptors, which are non-residential. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the Site and adjacent properties: The current use of the Site is an undeveloped parcel. Some parking occurs on the eastern end of the Site. Adjacent properties are mostly commercial to the east and south. An industrial property, the K-Ply Site and other industrial properties lie to the west, across the Valley Creek Estuary (which is adjacent to the Site on the west). WT785PAC.ENV/050902 b. Has the Site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. The site has not been used for agriculture, although it was previously a log storage yard. c. Describe any structures on the Site. There are currently no structures on the Site. To the west, the Valley Creek estuary site has been developed with a viewing platform and a small pavilion. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. There are no structures which would be demolished. The current parking area on the east portion of the Site would be pre-empted by the hotel/conference center and its parking requirements. e. What is the current zoning classification of the Site? ~t~d'~.,. ,,~ The City of Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan lists the site as a ,/ . ~tb.~ ( ~ _ commercial property within the "Harbor" planning area (City of Port --,~t [,~ ~ 1b~0-t/ Angeles 2000). /~ --},,~t.~ f. What is the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the Site? · ~ >, r~'~ ' The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as "Commercial" and lying td~q i~ .)~ ~,,Xg2-~ within the Harbor Planning Area (City of Port Angeles 2000). [e, pX ~i**/ h. Has any part of the Site been classified as an "environmentally ~ ka~ sensitive" area? If so, specify. ~Y X~c/ The Site lies along the Harbor Shoreline and as such is within an environmentally sensitive area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?. The hotel/conference center would have an on-site staff of approximately 60-70 employees. Anticipated time distribution of these employees would be 55-65 on day shift, 35-45 on swing shift and 5-10 on graveyard shift. Construction workers are expected to vary between ten and forty throughout the construction period. Estimated construction workers each month is shown in Table 1. WT785PAC.ENV/050902 ,~ j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None necessary. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will be compatible with the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan (City of Port Angeles 2000). Goals of that Plan for commercial properties include encouraging new and existing commercial developments which are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, where adequate City Services are already available. The project meets the third goal of the City of Port Angeles Shoreline Master Program Update (City of Port Angeles 2000). This is to "Promote a mix of recreational, boating and commercial uses generally between Cherry Street ROW (extended) and Eunice Street ROW (extended). Establish this area as an attractive mixed-use International Gateway district serving visitors and local citizens". 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. None. No long-term housing units will be created by the project. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. None. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. Not applicable. WT785PAC.ENV/050902 20 /Q~ AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas. What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The building will ben maximu~t in height (4 stories). Principal exterior building materials~ill be natural materials (wood and stone) and designed to blend with the surrounding buildings. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? ~. Views of the Harbor from Front Street will be restricted or blocked. .~,,j,,~.~eg_ Views from some other nearby commercial businesses (on Oak and ~ Railroad) will be restricted or blocked. Views from homes on the 4~' bluff (2nd Street) will have a portion of their harbor view restricted. c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: A lower structure would block less views from the bluff. Any structure will block views from Front, Oak and Railroad. A lower structure would have to be larger in horizontal dimensions in order to contain the same space in rooms and conference center. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE · -,, ~a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of ~b~*s~v~.~~' '~0,~- ~,. day would it mainly occur?. 0,~/uS' The proposal will produce some light and glare due to exterior ~(~tf'b~'~''~ 3~ ~'~ ~ lighting and cars moving and parking on the Site. Light and glare impacts will occur mostly in the late evening after dark. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light and glare is not expected to be a safety hazard. Light and glare will not significantly affect views of the Harbor, although it will contribute to diminishment of sky views as do all city lights. WT785PAC.ENV/0509ff2 2~ c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect the proposal? Existing light and glare is not expected to affect the proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: New lighting should be down-directed toward the ground and no sodium or high intensity lighting should be used. Area lighting is a very effective substitute and has been shown to provide sufficient lighting for safety and security purposes when used in a well designed system. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the ~ ~j~"~.z,¢ immediate vicinity? ~c~: ¢~'~c~-There is a wide variety of recreational opportunities in the Port ~.~,v t~xa,, o~' ~ Angeles Area The Waterfront Trail currently passes the Site and ,4~'~,c' v 4"'~¢,.C~ o>'_;~building'~ plans' call for it to be routed along the waterfront on the ~%fd~ north s~de of the Hotel/Conference Center. Other recreaUonal f0~ ~, activities in the area include boating, fishing, hiking, camping, o3 ~, picnicking and a variety of sports related activities. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The project would not replace any existing recreation. If properly designed, it could enhance recreational opportunities by providing additional opportunities on-site and by tieing into the adjacent Valley Creek Estuary. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. The project applicant should encourage public access and recreational use of the Site including improvements to the waterfront trail. These will include trail improvements as well as benches, landscaping and other amenities. WT785PAC.ENV/050902 22 ¢~ '~l-~A~/~~ 13. HISTORIC AND CULTUP, AL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the Site? If so, generally describe. No. There are no historical objects or structures known on the Site. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the Site. There are no landmarks or known evidence of historic, archaeologic, scientific or cultural landmarks on or next to the Site. The harbor area adjacent to the Site is part of the traditional harvest area of the Lower Elwha Clallam Tribe. It is possible that during construction, artifacts could be discovered, however, this is made somewhat unlikely since the Site has been filled since the period prior to the 1860's when tribal use of the area occurred. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: ~/ The project site will be reviewed by a Cultural Review Team as specified in the City's Shoreline Master Program Update. This team will include the owner, the City and representatives of the Lower Elwha S'Klallam Tribe. In the event that historical or cultural artifacts are uncovered during construction, excavation should be halted, the State Historic Preservation Office should be contacted, and a qualified archaeologist should remove the artifacts from the area. 14. TRANSPORTATION Transportation is a major issue. The facility will add many vehicle trips to an area which is planned to house the Gateway Transportation Center being planned by the City of Port Angeles. It also is in the area served by the Victoria ferries (MV Coho and the Victoria Express). This traffic plus normal downtown business traffic and through traffic is discussed below. In the event that the City deems that significant impacts seem likely, a more detailed traffic study may be needed. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the Site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on Site Plans, if any. WT785PAC. ENV/050902 23 The Site is served by Front Street and Oak Street as well as Railroad Avenue. Site plans show one access on Oak Street, just south of Railroad and another access at the west end of the Site onto Front Street (which is one-way to the west at this location - see Figure 2). b. Is the Site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The Site is served by a public transit stop on Oak Street. The planned Gateway Project will result in a centralized public transit stop within two blocks of the proposed project. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? ,4( ~),-\~/V-v' ~ .__~ ~~ The project will eliminate the 50-100 spaces which are currently used for all~day parking, mainly for Victoria ferry customers. The project would create ~n-site parking spaces, utilize 91 additional spaces ~ ~"<~,~ to the north o~UOak Street and 160 additional spaces in the area, the q/ location of which has not yet been determined. These may be 'v°\~'~ generated by construction of a multi-level parking structure either at .~ Oak and Front Streets or some other nearby location. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The project will not create or improve any roads of streets, except for improvements at the two access polls. Front and Oak Streets already have sidewalks· e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project is adjacent to water transportation, particularly the two ferries which serve the Port Angeles to Victoria crossing. There is no rail transportation near the project. Air transportation to the area is provided at William Fairchild International Airport, located on the west side of Port Angeles· Commercial air transportation is currently provided by Horizon Airlines. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur· WT785PAC. ENV/050902 24 ~ The project will generate up to 900 vehicle trips per day for the hotel section during maximum occupancy (assuming four to six one way trips per room per day including an assumed 300 one-way trips for employees) and up to 1,100 additional vehicle trips per day for the conference center during maximum conference use. This results in a total of up to 2,000 one-way vehicle trips per day for the facility. Actual numbers of vehicle trips will be lower than this, dropping to roughly 1,000 to 1,500 trips per day during winter months and less than 1,000 at times when no conferences are occurring (some hotel use, use of restaurants and a smaller hotel staff during this period). Conferences are expected to occur all year long and vehicle trips will therefore fluctuate between the maximum and minimum values depending on conference use. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The main transportation impacts are expected to be congestion during periods of high access and egress to and from the facility due to conferences, hotel use and restaurant use. When these times coincide with use of these streets by rush hour traffic and/or ferry traffic, congestion will be at a maximum. Increased congestion can be expected at the Oak Street stoplight at both Front and First Streets as well as in the left lane, turn around at Valley Street, where Front and First merge back to a two-way street. Currently, Front Street appears to operate in this area at Level of Service A (LOS A) indicating free flowing signalized traffic with no substantial delays. Current traffic counts are shown in Table 2. With the facility, LOS levels at the Oak Street intersections (at both Front and First Streets) would be expected to decrease to levels B or C during high occupancy periods, possibly dropping to LOS D (up to 60- 75 percent delays) during peak congestion hours. These estimates are based on percentage increases and anticipated percentage increases during peak hours and have not been rigorously calculated. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example; fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. WT785PAC. ENV/050902 2~ The project would result in an incremental increase in need for public services. Project staff would be expected to be drawn both from local sources and out of the area. Staff who move to Port Angeles would utilize all services provided by the City, including schools. Patrons at the facility would not utilize high levels of local public services, except for emergency medical services (provided in the City by Olympic Medical Center). There would, however, be some necessary increase in police protection and fire protection due to the facility. The City police department does not anticipate need for any additional officers due to the facility. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: The facility will be fitted with an automatic sprinkler system and other fire protection measures according to the City codes. Down- directed security lighting will be used on parking areas and near building entrances. a. List utilities currently available at the Site (electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other). All City utilities are presently available at the Site, including electricity, water, sewer, refuse collection, telephone and telecommunications. The project will result in an incremental increased use of these facilities. The City does not anticipate any problems with capacity for any of these utilities. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the Site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utilities are available along Front and Oak streets. Utilities will be brought into the Site during the normal construction period. Utility lines will be buried prior to final grading of the Site. WT785PAC. ENV/050902 26 I01 'vtg~/Q , I~AY 1 7 2o02 L, W'["'/~AC.L=NV,q]~O~02 ~, ,, ~OMMUNII~ DEV[LOPMENT 4.0 DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 DISCUSSION The project as currently designed does not appear to generate any impacts which can not be mitigated. The parking issue has not yet been fully resolved between the developer and the City. The increase in traffic will add congestion to an area which experiences periodic congestion from a combination of rush hour traffic, ferry traffic and bus traffic. This may increase with completion of the Gateway Center being planned by the City and will increase during the summer season due to general traffic increases coupled with increased ferry traffic. Fish and wildlife agencies have not yet commented on the proposal, but are expected to review this Environmental Assessment. 4.2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Some aspects of the project have not yet gone through final design. It is recommended that the City determine whether this would affect timing of the threshold determination. WT785PAC. ENV/050902 ~s 5.0 REFERENCES City of Port Angeles. 2000a. City of Port Angeles. Comprehensive Plan. Department of Community Developmem. Port Angeles, Washington. City of Port Angeles. 2000b. City of Port Angeles. Shoreline Master Program Update. Prepared by Makers Architecture and Urban Design. Port Angeles, Washington. City of Port Angeles. 2002. Unpublished traffic coum data. Department of Public Works. Port Angeles, Washington. Ehm Architecture. 2002a. Unpublished data on construction schedules, construction workers, hotel employees etc. Unpublished design drawings of Proposed Port Angeles Hotel and Conference Center (Due Diligence Response). Ehm Architecture. Seattle, Washington. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 1990. Flood Insurance Rate Maps for Port Angeles. Washington. Map//3 of 6 for Port Angeles, WA. Washington, D.C. North Olympic Peninsula Salmon Habitat Recovery Lead Entity. 2001. 2001 Project Strategy, Version 002. NOPLE. Port Angeles, Washington. Northwestern Territories, Inc. 2002. Unpublished survey and stormwater planning information. Port Angeles, Washington. PacRim Geotechnical, Inc. 2002. Letter Report to Mr. Randall Ehm dated May 8, 2002 on Project # 115-001, Technical Memo for the Hotel and Conference Center, Port Angeles, Washington. Seattle, Washington. Pentec Environmental. 2001. Port Angeles Harbor Shoreline Habitat Assessment. Report #1257101. City of Port Angeles. Port Angeles, Washington. Shea, G. Bradford, C.C. Ebbesmeyer, Q.J. Stoher, K. Pazera, J. Cox, J.M. Helseth and S. Hemingway. 1981. History_. Dispersion and Effects of Pulpmill Effluents on R¢~'lving Waters. Port Angeles. Washington. Northwest Environmental Consultants, Final Report, submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Justice. Seattle, Washington. Soil Conservation Service. 1987. Soil Survey of Clallam County Area. Washington. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Olympia, Washington. WT785PAC.ENV/050902 ~9 Transportation Research Board. 1985. Highway Capacity Manual. Special Report #209. National Research Council. Washington, D.C. U.S. Geological Survey. 1985. Quadrangle Map for Port Angeles, Washington. 1:24,000 Scale. Published 1961, photorevised 1985. U.S.G.S. Denver, Colorado. WT785PAC.ENV/050902 ~o ~o/ 6.0 FIGURF~ WT785P AC.ENV /050902 31 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. Box 47775 · Olympia, Washington 98504.7775 · (360) 407-6300 July 12, 2002 ~ Your address Mr. Brad Collins, Director ~ , :, is in the City of Port Angeles , Department of Community Development '. 321 East Fifth Street Port Angeles, WA 98362 z,'., .. ~. ~,.,,~..~_~ watershed Dear Mr. Collins: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of non-significance for the proposed Port Angeles Hotel and Conference Center construction, located west of Oak Street, north of Front Street, and east of Valley Creek Estuary Site, as proposed by Randal Ehm. We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments: Corps of Engineers: The proposed new stormwater outfall may require a 401 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers and a 401 from Ecology. Shorelands: For shoreline permitting, accurate site plans ~vill need to meet the requirements of WAC 173-27-180. We note the DNS document we reviewed did not include any site plans or cross section views, and there are differing statements on the height (ranging from 42' to 66' ) of the proposed structure(s). "Mitigation measures" are referred to, but those were not included with the checklist. Considering the significant scale and potential long-term impacts of this project on shoreline resources and ecology, ~ve advise coordination in advance with Ecology field staff; especially on matters of public access, riparian habitat enhancement, and avoidance of neighboring residential view impairments, to ensure that all requirements have been met in advance of permit approval at the local level, and so to avoid unnecessary delays thereafter." If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments, please call Ms. Helen Pressley with the Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program/Permits at (360) 407-6926, and/or Mr. Jeff Stewart with the Shorelands and Environmetnal Assistance Prograln/Shorelands at (360) 407- 6521. Sincerely, ~,[~ ~ [~ ~ ~ [~ ~ Opal Smitherman Administrative Coordinator I ,. Southwest Regional Office CI'P? OF PORT ANGELES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OS:1mc(02-3893) cc: Helen Pressley, SWRO/SEA Jeff Stewart, SWRO/SEA Jan 29 2013 03:14PM Olympic Electric Co, Inc 3604523498 CITY OF PORT ANGELES PERMIT A,PPLICATIOIV Building Division /Eleetrical Inspections 321 East Fifth Street — P.O, Box 1150 / Port Angeles Washington, 95352 Ph: (360) 417 -4735 Fax: (360) 417 -4711 Date a Mulil•Pamily or Commerclal* page 1 wkA 11C]RF ,r ;;� Plan Review May Be Requ red, Please Complele Electrical Plan Review Information Sheet JobAddross Sr- Bulidiny Square Footage -- description of above - -� ;�rtr.�r- ..r �f7•� i' l>�- ��f' -�"� � _ tr•�'F./'f'r"f / �'�iE�.C.�.�a���.7 Owner Information Name .f��z_' Mailing Adcre a '` � • Stale Zip'. -, phone: t5-� yii�Fax: _ Licensa #I / Exp, Item Unit Charge 5ervicefFeeder200Anp, $ 132,00 ServicelFeeder 201.400 Amp, $ 160,00 ServicelFeeder 401 -60C Amp $ 225.00 ServicelFeeder 601 -1000 Amp, $ 288,00 Service /Feeder over 1000 Am c , $ 410.00 Branch Circu it W1 Service Feeder $ 5,00 Branch Circuit N110 Service Feeder $ 14.00 Each Additional Branch Circjit $ 5,00 Branch Cir�uils 1.4 $ 86.00 Temp. Service/ Feeder 200 Amp. $ 102,00 Temp. Service/Feeder 201 -400 Amp. $121.00 Temp. ServicelFeeder 401 -500 Amp $ 164,00 Temp. ServicelFeeder 601 -1000 Amp , $ 1$5,00 Portal to Portal Hourly $ 96,00 SignlOalirne Lighting $ 88,00 Signal 3ircuitl Limited Energy- Multi -Far iiy $ 54.00 Signal Oircuit/ Limited Energy I First 15X sf -- Commercial $ 96.00 Ncte: $5.00 for each additional 1500 sl Renewable Electrical Energy - 5KVA System or Less $ 113.00 Thermostat $ 56.00 Note: $5.00 for each additional T•Stat Contractor Information Name: OLYMPIC E:EC7MC Mailing Address: A235 ruMwarerz — — Cityl PCRIANGELES Stale: WA Zip; 58:ifi3" Phone; 380.4575307 Fax: 6C-452-MB License 41 Exp. cLV�iPEC�es ❑, ON Total (QIV Multiplied-by Unit Char e Jr r $ J� $ $ $ $ Total Owner as defined by RCVY.19.28.261: (1) Owner will occupy the structure for two years after this electrical permit is finalized. (2) 01Nner is re ui to hire an electrical contractor if above said property is for sale, rent or lease Permit expires after six months of last inspection After reading the above statemenl, I hereby certify that I am the owner of the above named property or a licensed electrical contractor, I am making the electrical instalialion or alteratfon in compliance with the electrical laws, N.E C., RCW Chapter 19.28, WAG, Chapter 296 -4613, The City of Port Angeles Municipal Code, and Utility Specifications and PAMC 14.05.050 regarding Electrical Permit Applications, Signature of owner, electrical contractor or electrical administrator: ❑ cash ❑ check IT Credit Card 0 X f , a.-'� _ - -- ��Dated:,�! •r _ olr07n01 Vv ELECTRICAL PERMIT CITY OF PORT ANGELES 360 - 417 -4735 Application Number . . , 13- 00004113 Date 1/30/13 Application pin number , . , 571954 DITCH Property Address , . , . . , 200 N OAK ST SLIGT ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: R6-30-00-0-0- 0000 Application type type description ELECTRICAL ONLY Subdivision Name *Z7 t'! Property Use . . . . . , , , FINAL Property Zoning . . . . . , , UNKNOWN' Application valuation . . , . 0 Application desc Waterfront project Owner Contractor CITY OF PORT ANGELES OLYMPIC ELECTRIC CO INC PO BOX 1150 4230 TUMWATER PORT ANGELES WA 983620217 PORT ANGELES' WA 98363 (360) 457 -5303 - ^- Permit . . , , , , ELECTRICAL NEW COMMERICAL Additional desc , . Permit Fee 531.00 Plan Check Fee 00 Issue Date 1/30/13 Valuation 0 Expiration Date 7/29/1.3 Qty Unit Charge Per Extension 27.00 5,0000 ECH EL- BRANCH CIRCUIT W /FEEDER 135.00 3.00 132,0000 ECH EL -COM 0 -200 SRV FEEDER 396.00 Fee summary Charged Paid Credited Due Permit Fee Total 531,00 531,00 .00 .00 Plan Check Total .00 .00 .00 .00 Grand Total 531,00 531.00 .00 .00 , �N REPORT SALES TAX on your excise tax form to the City of Port Angeles (Location Code 0502)- ,zq a-> INSPECTION TYPE DATE: RESULTS: INSPECTOR: DITCH SERVICE ROUGH -IN *Z7 t'! FINAL ! COMMENTS: PERMIT WILL EXPIRE SIX (6) MONTHS FROM LAST INSPECTION Signature of owner or Electrical Contractor X G:TXCHANGE\BUILDING Date: lr.�y,��': N N 1 `1