The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC Agenda Packet 04/05/2022 tiir"O�j��ft April 5, 2022 City of Port Angeles Council Meeting Agenda This meeting will be conducted as a hybrid meeting;open to the public with virtual attendance available. Visit https://www.cityofpa.us/Live-Virtual-Meetings to learn how to participate during public comment and or watch the meeting live. The Mayor may determine the order of business for a particular City Council meeting. The agenda should be arranged to best serve the needs and/or convenience of the Council and the public. The Mayor will determine time of break.Hearing devices are available for those needing assistance. The items of business for regular Council meetings may include the following: A. Call to Order—Special Meeting at 5:00 p.m.—Volunteer Practice Field Public Comment Opportunity-City Council and staff recognize the importance of youth activities in the community and are committed to working with user groups to ensure recreational needs are met. Members of the public are invited to provide input on the recent consideration of Volunteer Practice Field as a potential location for a Joint Public Safety Facility.Topics include possible mitigation of the practice field,and enhancements to the main field.We ask attendees to come with an open mind,be prepared to share concerns and discuss recreational needs,and provide creative suggestions.City Council looks forward to hearing from you and working towards positive solutions. Call to Order—Regular Meeting at 6:00 p.m. B. Roll Call,Pledge of Allegiance Ceremonial Matters,Proclamations& Employee Recognitions 1. Recognition of National Telecommunicators Week April 101 to the 151 2. Recognition of Week of the Young Child April 101 to the 161 C. Public Comment The City Council desires to allow the opportunity for Public Comment.However,the business of the City must proceed in an orderly and timely manner.Written public comments can be submitted to: council(a=cityofpa.us,comments will not be read out loud. To provide pre-recorded messages to the City Council by phone,please call 360-417-4504.Messages received will be made a part of the final record.Comments should be received by 2:00 p.m.Tuesday,April 5,2022. For audio only please call: 1-844-992-4726 Use access code: 2557 303 0703 Once connected press *3 to raise your virtual hand,if you wish to make a comment or public testimony. You will be notified when it is your turn to speak. This access code is good for the April 5,2022 meeting only. If you are joining in through the Webex link: hops://cityofpa.webex.com/cityfpa/onstage/g.bhp?MTID=e7debb3 l 6e54d4adbb4e79443 f,od9ec46 and wish to make a comment or public testimony,please use the"raise your hand"feature in Webex.You will be notified when it is your turn to speak.Members of the public may address the City Council at the beginning and end of any Regular Meeting under "Public Comment."During the "Public Comment"portion of the meeting,individuals may speak to agenda items,except those scheduled for a Public Hearing. The City Council desires to allow the opportunity for Public Comment.At any time,the presiding officer,in the presiding officer's sole discretion,may set such reasonable limits as are necessary to prevent disruption of other necessary business. At its most restrictive,Public Comment shall be limited to a total of 15 minutes for the first Public Comment period and shall be concluded not later than 9:45 for the second Public Comment period. Individuals may speak for three(3)minutes or less,depending on the number of people wishing to speak.If more than 20 people are signed up to speak each speaker may be allocated two(2)minutes. Individuals who are residents of the City or own businesses within the City will be called to speak first,with preference given to those who wish to speak to an item on the meeting's agenda. If time remains,the presiding officer will call other individuals wishing to speak,generally in the order in which they have signed in.If time is available,the presiding officer may call for additional unsigned speakers. April 5,2022 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page 1 Persons speaking shall state their name,whether they reside within the City limits,whether they have any other pertinent connection to the City,and whether they are appearing as the representative of an organization.Excerpts: Council Rules of Procedure Section 12 Public hearings are set by the City Council in order to meet legal requirements.City Council may set a public hearing in order to receive public input prior to making decisions which impact citizens.Certain matters may be controversial and City Council may choose to seek public opinion through the public hearing process. D. Late Items To be placed on this or future agendas, including any executive session needed during or at the end of the meeting. E. Consent Agenda I Approve 1. City Council Minutes of March 1,2022..........................................................................................................................E-1 2. Expenditure Report:From March 5, 2022 to March 25, 2022 in the amount of$1,567,630.57.....................................E-4 3. City Pier Transient Moorage Float Replacement/Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign a contract with Topper Floats and make minor modifications to the agreement, if necessary.............................................................................E-26 4. Utility Wooden Power Poles—Material Purchase/Award a contract to Stella-Jones Corporation of Tacoma, WA for 70 wooden poles at a price of$84,513.66 including sales tax and authorize the City Manager to sign and to make minor modifications to the contract if necessary.......................................................................................................................E-29 5. 20-inch Emergency Water Line Repair,CON 2021-49,Final Acceptance/Accept the 20-inch Emergency Water Line Repair Project No.CON 2021-49 as complete,and authorize staff to proceed with project closeout,and release the 5%retainage upon receipt of all required clearances............................................................................................................................E-30 F. Public Hearings 16.30 p.m. or Soon Thereafter 1. Milwaukee Trails Subdivision Development NICE funds request and Development Agreement/Conduct Public Hearing/ PassResolution/Approve...............................................................................................................................................F-1 G. Ordinances Not Requiring Council Public Hearings 1. 2022 Budget Amendment#1 /Conduct I s'Reading/Continue to April 19....................................................................G-1 H. Resolutions Not Requiring Council Public Hearings 1. Volunteer Practice Field Discussion and Resolution/Pass Resolution..........................................................................H-1 2. Two Resolutions Relating to Nuisances and Blight at 204 E.Front St. l Pass Resolutions............................................H-5 3. 2022 Cost of Living Adjustment(COLA)for Management,Administrative and Non-Represented Personnel/Pass Resolution .........................................................................................................................................................................................H-126 I. Other Considerations 1. GreenLink Port Angeles Presentation on Phase 1 and Phase II Valley Creek Daylight Feasibility Assessment and Valley Creek Master Plan/Presentation....................................................................................................................................I-1 2. Olympic Community of Health/Presentation 3. County's Housing Solutions Committee/Appoint..........................................................................................................I-153 4. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Appointments/Appoint...........................................................................................I-156 5. Planning Commission Appointment/Appoint................................................................................................................I-158 6. Appoint Ad Hoc Committees/Appoint...........................................................................................................................I-159 J. Contracts & Purchasing...................................................................................................................................................None K. Council Reports L. Information City Manager Reports: M. Second Public Comment Follow the instructions from the first public comment period. Adjournment April 5,2022 Port Angeles City Council Meeting Page 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Port Angeles, Washington March 1, 2022 This meeting was conducted virtually. CALL TO ORDER-REGULAR MEETING Mayor Dexter called the regular meeting of the Port Angeles City Council to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Mayor Dexter,Deputy Mayor Meyer,Council Members Carr,French,McCaughan, Schromen- Wawrin and Suggs. Members Absent: None. Staff Present: City Manager West,Attorney Bloor,Clerk Martinez-Bailey,C. Delikat,K. Dubuc,B. Smith, E. Bolin,T. Hunter,and S. Carrizosa. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Dexter led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. CEREMONIAL MATTERS,PROCLAMATIONS & EMPLOYEE RECOGNITIONS 1. Public Safety Telecommunicators Life-Saving Awards to Communications Officer Brooke Pucciarelli Police Chief Brian Smith and PenCom Deputy Directory Karl Hatton presented the Life-Saving Award to Brook Pucciarelli for her compassion and professionalism in the line of work. Chief Smith and Deputy Director Hatton provided background on the situation and about Ms.Pucciarelli's exceptional work when she provided extended lifesaving phone CPR instructions and emotional support to a caller. PUBLIC COMMENT No public comment was received. LATE ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON THIS OR FUTURE AGENDAS The Mayor added a Utility Advisory Committee Appointment and Public Works Trust Fund Discussion to the agenda as Other Considerations items as I-5 and I-6. CONSENT AGENDA Deputy Mayor Meyer asked the Mayor to consider moving A"Street Substation Electrical Switchgear Upgrade Contract Award and Council member McCaughan asked the Mayor to consider moving the Teamsters Local 589 Sworn Officers Unit Collective Bargaining Agreement to the Consent Agenda. Hearing Consensus from the Council, the Mayor moved the items to the Consent Agenda as items E-5 and E-6. It was moved by McCaughan and seconded by Schromen-Wawrin to approve the Consent Agenda to include: 1. City Council Minutes of February 1,February 15,and February 22,2022/Approve 2. Expenditure Report:From February 5, 2022 to February 18, 2022 in the amount of$1,291,390.39/Approve 3. PenCom 911 Center Console Replacement/Authorize the City Manager to complete the purchase offour PenCom workstation consoles from the NASPO contract and enter into a contract for the electrical work required for installation and to make minor changes as necessary. 4. Planning Commission Appointments/Re-appoint Ben Stanley and Andrew Schwab to the Planning Commission for 4-year terms ending February 28, 2026 5. "A" Street Substation Electrical Switchgear Upgrade—Contract Award/Award a contract with KVA Electric Inc ofArlington WA to upgrade the A Street Substation Electrical Switchgear in the amount not to exceed 297,638.72, including taxes, and authorize the City Manager to sign all documents necessary to execute a contract with KVA Electric and to make minor modifications as necessary 6. Teamsters Local 589 Sworn Officers Unit Collective Bargaining Agreement/Staff recommends the City Council approve the terms of the Teamsters Local 589 Sworn Officers Unit collective bargaining agreement as April 5, 2022 E - 1 PORT ANGELES CITY COUNCIL MEETING—March 1,2022 outlined in this memo and authorize the City Manager to make minor modifications to the agreement as necessary. The Mayor asked if there was unanimous consent,hearing no opposition,the motion carried 7-0. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 1. Solid Waste Updates Director of Public Works&Utilities Thomas Hunter presented updates on the solid waste transfer of services from Waste Connections,Inc.to the City of Port Angeles that began early that day per the contract termination. He shared an update on recycling containers and spoke to the ordinance that would soon be before Council relative to additional services not previously provided by the City. Director Hunter stated that since the City planned to provide new services to customers,the fees would need to be adopted by code before the City had the authority to bill customers. Finance Director Sarina Carrizosa spoke to the code adoption and stated the reasoning the ordinance was necessary,adding it wasn't a change to existing rates,but instead was an addition of services previously provided by Waste Connections,Inc. She stated the costs were for comingled recycling and cardboard recycling for commercial customers. She added the ordinance that contained these fees would come before Council during the March 15 meeting. 2. Short Term Rental Discussion City Manager Nathan West provided background on municipal code prioritization relative to the agenda item and stated in consideration of the diversity of Council opinions,staff were looking for Council input. Manager West suggested if there was interest,Council could choose to hold a work session in April. He stated Madrona Law Group could be available to provide a presentation on the approach other cities are taking relative to short term rentals,adding it would be a great opportunity to plan through the important public process. Council was in support of further discussions on the matter. Council discussion followed. 4.Public Safety Advisory Board City Clerk Martinez-Bailey provided background on the Public Safety Advisory Board agenda item, stating Kelsey Lane's appointment was supported by the Public Safety Advisory Board. Clerk Bailey-Martinez provided additional information relative to the Board's discussion. Council discussion followed. It was moved by Schromen-Wawrin and seconded by Carr to: Re-appoint Kelsey Lane as the representative from the Port Angeles School District for a term ending February 28, 2026. The Mayor asked if there was unanimous consent,hearing no opposition,the motion carried 7-0. It was moved by Schromen-Wawrin and seconded by Carr to: Table the discussion on appointments to positions#8 and#12 to the March 15 meeting. The Mayor asked if there was unanimous consent,hearing no opposition,the motion carried 7-0. 5. LATE ITEM Utility Advisory Appointment Clerk Martinez-Bailey provided background on the late item, stating staff had been notified that previously appointed Industrial Customer Representative Raj Jethwa had resigned from the Committee. Mr. Jethwa was recently re-appointed by City Council as the City's Industrial Customer Representative representing McKinley Paper Company. She added the City received a recommendation from McKinley staff,recommending the appointment of Terry Nishimoto. It was moved by Schromen-Wawrin and seconded by Suggs to: Appoint Terry Nishimoto as the Industrial Customer Representative on the Utility Advisory Committee for the unexpired term ending February 28,2026. The Mayor asked if there was unanimous consent,hearing no opposition,the motion carried 7-0. 6. LATE ITEM Public Works Trust Fund—Letter of Opposition Mayor Dexter provided background on the late item, stating the recommendation would be Council support of Association of Washington Cities recommendation to communicate to the 24th Legislative District representatives the City of Port Angeles' opposition to reducing funding to the Public Works Trust Fund(aka Public Works Assistance Account). Manager West spoke to the item and provided additional information including projects that received Page 2 of 3 April 5, 2022 E - 2 PORT ANGELES CITY COUNCIL MEETING—March 1,2022 funding through the program,including the 8th Street Bridges,Combined Sewer Overflow project,Downtown water main projects,and storm water repairs. Director Hunter spoke to the matter and the need for Council's support. It was moved by Schromen-Wawrin and seconded by Meyer to: Direct the Mayor or City Manager to urgently communicate to our 24th Legislative District representatives the City of Port Angeles' opposition to reducing funding to the Public Works Trust Fund (aka Public Works Assistance Account). The Mayor asked if there was unanimous consent,hearing no opposition,the motion carried 7-0. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Council member McCaughan provided updates on Shore Aquatic Center activities and events. Council member Suggs shared updates on a recent County Marine Resources Committee meeting. Council member Schromen-Wawrin spoke to a graph shared by the meeting host that related to a conference on the future of public health. Council member Carr spoke about North Olympic Development Council climate stakeholder meeting and spoke about sea level rise. She provided an update from a County Commissioner meeting and spoke about upcoming open houses relative to organizations providing homeless services. Mayor Dexter spoke about a Feiro Marine Life Center meeting and spoke about a change of meeting location for the Lauridsen Trust group. No other reports were given. INFORMATION Manager West spoke about an upcoming meeting regarding climate action and provided a housing grant update. SECOND PUBLIC COMMENT Steve Dryke, city resident and former City of Port Angeles, in a pre-recorded message, spoke about concerns of the lack of ADA access at the comers of Francis and Georgianna Streets. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Dexter adjourned the meeting at 8:18 p.m. Kate Dexter,Mayor Kari Martinez-Bailey,City Clerk Page 3 of 3 April 5, 2022 E - 3 R G LES ME'MO April 5, 2022 Finance Department We, the undersigned City Officials of the City of Port Angeles, do hereby ....... certify that the merchandise andi/or services herein specified have been received aind that these claims acre approved for payment in the amount of Sarina Cm 6zosa $1,567,630.57 this 5th day of April, 2022. Hnance r)ireoar nina McKce SenOrAccountant MarySuv French Mayor City Mian,aiger Scnior Accounsant L imida Kherratv Financial Systems o�6alym Melody Schneider Managenmit Accountant Micall Rose Financial Analyst huic Perkins PaynAl Specialim jdnon Jones Accountaw Julie Powill AcCOLftlting Technician Luke Andemm Accounting I alinician NiWle Mank Administrwive Analyst Kathyellen Harwy Customer Services Manager Tracy Rooks tftihty Billing SpeciaRsa City of Port Angeles t ` City Council Expenditure Report r.. Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 ;+IA9S+k Vendor Description Account Number Amount A/R MISCELLANEOUS REFUNDS REFUND FOR BIG HURT EVENT 001-0000-213.10-90 300.00 REFUND FOR BIG HURT EVENT 001-0000-213.10-90 891.17 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Excise Tax Returns-Feb 001-0000-237.00-00 38.53 Excise Tax Returns-Feb 001-0000-237.30-00 723.73 MISC DEPOSIT& PERMIT REFUNDS OL REFUNDS 001-0000-213.10-91 95.04 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT City Credit Card Pmt 001-0000-213.10-95 (22,804.14) SYSTEM City Credit Card 001-0000-213.10-95 20,877.87 WA STATE PATROL FEBRUARY 2022 FINGERPRINT 001-0000-229.50-00 119.25 Division Total: $241.45 Department Total: $241.45 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 001-1210-513.31-01 22.72 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT PDN news subscription 001-1210-513.49-01 161.20 SYSTEM WCMA membership-West 001-1210-513.49-01 315.00 Employee recognition-phot 001-1210-513.31-01 9.78 City Manager Division Total: $508.70 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Annual fee-random drug/al 001-1220-516.41-50 62.50 SYSTEM Human Resources Division Total: $62.50 CLALLAM CNTY AUDITOR MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 001-1230-514.44-10 24,148.76 City Clerk Division Total: $24,148.76 City Manager Department Total: $24,719.96 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT MRSC Webinar-Carrizosa 001-2020-514.43-10 35.00 SYSTEM MRSC Webinar-Carrizosa 001-2020-514.43-10 35.00 Finance Administration Division Total: $70.00 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Excise Tax Returns-Feb 001-2023-514.44-50 5.98 MISC TRAVEL Fee 001-2023-514.41-50 10.00 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT GP GAAFR Plus-McKee 001-2023-514.49-01 65.00 SYSTEM GAAP Guide 2022-McKee 001-2023-514.31-01 441.40 Accounting Division Total: $522.38 LEXISNEXIS FINANCIAL SERVICES 001-2025-514.41-50 163.20 OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC PRINTING,SILK SCR,TYPSET 001-2025-514.31-01 191.49 PAYMENTUS GROUP INC Transaction fees 001-2025-514.41-50 223.50 Transaction fees 001-2025-514.41-50 13,246.92 Customer Service Division Total: $13,825.11 Finance Department Total: $14,417.49 Page 1 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 4 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report Q' Between Mar 5f f 2022 and Mar 25 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount LEGAL FILES SOFTWARE, INC YEARLY MAINTENANCE FEE 001-3030-515.48-02 1,728.00 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC Office Supplies 001-3030-515.31-01 60.75 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Office supplies 001-3030-515.31-01 11.69 SYSTEM Office supplies-USBs 001-3030-515.31-01 148.79 Shipping-BLM application 001-3030-515.49-90 21.35 Service fee-bar dues-Bloo 001-3030-515.49-01 11.72 Service fee-bar dues-Cowg 001-3030-515.49-01 11.72 WSBA bar dues-Bloor 001-3030-515.49-01 468.98 WSBA bar dues-Bloor-Cowgi 001-3030-515.49-01 468.98 City Attorney Division Total: $2,931.98 City Attorney Department Total: $2,931.98 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT WABO membership-Lierly 001-4050-558.49-01 95.00 SYSTEM Building Division Total: $95.00 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT PDN news subscription 001-4060-558.49-01 9.60 SYSTEM Job Posting-CED Director 001-4060-558.49-01 150.00 Facebook boost advertisem 001-4060-558.41-15 114.65 Job Posting-CED Director 001-4060-558.49-01 295.00 Planning Division Total: $569.25 Community Development Department Total: $664.25 LEXISNEXIS LIBRARY SERVICES(EXCL 908 001-5010-521.49-01 4,021.81 MISC TRAVEL C RIFE-BACKGROUND INVESTI 001-5010-521.43-10 810.24 C RIFE-WEST POINT LEADERS 001-5010-521.43-10 339.25 PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC Q4 Subscription Fees 001-5010-521.41-50 419.00 Police Administration Division Total: $5,590.30 LINCOLN STREET STATION SHIPPING AND HANDLING 001-5021-521.42-10 12.79 SHIPPING AND HANDLING 001-5021-521.42-10 18.63 SHIPPING AND HANDLING 001-5021-521.42-10 12.82 SHIPPING AND HANDLING 001-5021-521.42-10 12.79 MISC TRAVEL CAMERON-CRISIS NEGOTIATIO 001-5021-521.43-10 293.25 THOMSON REUTERS-WEST SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 001-5021-521.49-01 184.68 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Class reg-Powless 001-5021-521.43-10 551.75 SYSTEM Coveralls for Detectives- 001-5021-521.31-01 260.35 Coveralls for Detectives- 001-5021-521.31-01 52.07 Coveralls for Detectives- 001-5021-521.31-01 52.07 Page 2 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 5 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Coveralls for Detectives- 001-5021-521.31-01 52.21 SYSTEM Office Chairs-Detective D 001-5021-521.31-01 1,468.75 Session 281 dues-225 001-5021-521.49-01 320.00 Investigation Division Total: $3,292.16 CHRIS'TOWING EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 001-5022-521.49-90 556.51 CURTIS&SONS INC, L N CLOTHING &APPAREL 001-5022-521.31-11 203.11 CLOTHING&APPAREL 001-5022-521.31-11 409.63 EVERGREEN COLLISION CENTER EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 001-5022-521.49-90 371.01 LINCOLN STREET STATION SHIPPING AND HANDLING 001-5022-521.42-10 43.08 SHIPPING AND HANDLING 001-5022-521.42-10 43.08 SHIPPING AND HANDLING 001-5022-521.42-10 12.79 MISC TRAVEL ARAND-WEST POINT MODEL SE 001-5022-521.43-10 552.50 N CLARK-PATROL RIFLE INST 001-5022-521.43-10 428.49 SOUND UNIFORM CLOTHING&APPAREL 001-5022-521.31-11 484.70 SOLUTIONS/BRATWEAR CLOTHING&APPAREL 001-5022-521.31-11 509.73 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 001-5022-521.31-01 3.23 SCHOOL EQUIP& SUPPLIES 001-5022-521.31-01 12.79 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT K9 gear 001-5022-521.49-80 131.59 SYSTEM Certified mail-signed inv 001-5022-521.45-21 7.70 Glock Training Reg-Morse 001-5022-521.43-10 250.00 VIKING SEW&VAC MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 001-5022-521.31-11 21.76 VOIANCE LANGUAGE SERVICES, MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 001-5022-521.42-10 12.50 LLC Patrol Division Total: $4,054.20 OLYMPIC PRINTERS INC PAPER(OFFICE,PRINT SHOP) 001-5029-521.31-01 530.94 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT iPhone charger 001-5029-521.31-01 30.33 SYSTEM iPhone case/wall clock 001-5029-521.31-01 55.06 WAPRO membership-Jacobi 001-5029-521.43-10 25.00 Records Division Total: $641.33 Police Department Total: $13,577.99 GLOBALSTAR USA 02-16 A/C AC00153767 001-6010-522.42-10 88.61 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC SUPPLIES 001-6010-522.31-01 79.51 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Breakfast items-Officer M 001-6010-522.31-01 23.89 SYSTEM Fire Administration Division Total: $192.01 Page 3 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 6 -- City of Port Angeles ` City Council Expenditure Report t4i;.. . Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE HAGAMAN UNIFORM ALLOW- M 001-6020-522.20-80 40.00 REIMBURSEMENT MISC ONE-TIME VENDORS Surplus fire hose 001-6020-522.35-01 500.00 NORTHWEST SAFETY CLEAN Repairs/Cleaning 001-6020-522.31-11 45.83 Repairs/Cleaning 001-6020-522.31-11 116.85 Repairs/Cleaning 001-6020-522.31-11 135.48 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Shield-Gonzales 001-6020-522.31-11 60.71 SYSTEM Starlink WiFi Satellite 001-6020-522.42-10 99.00 Brushes for rigs-Lav Ribb 001-6020-522.31-01 54.35 Lids for buckets for rigs 001-6020-522.31-01 43.68 Boots/spikes for crews-wi 001-6020-522.31-11 216.27 Airfare-Gonzales 001-6020-522.43-10 197.20 Danner boots-Turner 001-6020-522.20-80 274.12 Passports 001-6020-522.31-01 130.78 WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS Hearing testing 001-6020-522.41-50 716.66 INC Fire Suppression Division Total: $2,630.93 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT WSFMA membership-Sanders 001-6030-522.49-01 SYSTEM Fire Prevention Division Total: $594.00 NORTHWEST SAFETY CLEAN Repairs/Cleaning 001-6045-522.31-11 135.48 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Training books(2) 001-6045-522.43-10 161.03 SYSTEM BLS Program curriculum 001-6045-522.43-10 164.78 Shipping-BLS Program curr 001-6045-522.42-10 18.01 Fire Training Division Total: $479.30 A-1 PERFORMANCE, INC BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 001-6050-522.41-50 371.00 FERRELLGAS INC MANAGEMENT SERVICES 001-6050-522.47-10 844.59 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC SUPPLIES 001-6050-522.48-10 66.06 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Washer machine repair val 001-6050-522.48-10 84.73 SYSTEM Facilities Maintenance Division Total: $1,366.38 Fire Department Total: $5,262.62 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC BUILDER'S SUPPLIES 001-7010-532.31-01 402.29 BUILDER'S SUPPLIES 001-7010-532.31-01 606.18 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Monitor mount 001-7010-532.31-60 108.79 SYSTEM Office furniture 001-7010-532.31-80 3,289.80 Page 4 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 7 -- City of Port Angeles ` City Council Expenditure Report t4i;. .. Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Water fountain w/filter 001-7010-532.31-60 1,385.09 SYSTEM ITE Safety Conf-Boehme 001-7010-532.43-10 40.00 Job Posting-Civil/Utility 001-7010-532.44-10 295.00 Job Posting-Civil/Utility 001-7010-532.44-10 325.00 N95 Masks-Eng 001-7010-532.31-01 79.86 Disinfecting wipes 001-7010-532.31-01 43.50 Public Works Admin. Division Total: $6,575.51 Public Works& Utilities Department Total: $6,575.51 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT WRPA 20222 membership-Del 001-8010-574.49-01 172.00 SYSTEM Parks Administration Division Total: $172.00 HD SUPPLY SUPPLIES 001-8012-555.31-01 152.93 SUPPLIES 001-8012-555.31-01 160.41 Senior Center Division Total: $313.34 ANGELES MILLWORK& LUMBER SUPPLIES 001-8050-536.31-20 5.31 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Excise Tax Returns-Feb 001-8050-536.44-50 100.60 LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP SUPPLIES 001-8050-536.31-20 47.62 SOUND PUBLISHING INC SUPPLIES 001-8050-536.41-50 325.00 Ocean View Cemetery Division Total: $478.53 ANGELES MILLWORK&LUMBER SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 (225.65) SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 186.18 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 429.23 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 923.32 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 21.03 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 84.37 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 204.94 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 1,899.47 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 141.00 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 130.40 BILL'S PLUMBING & HEATING INC SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.45-30 200.00 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.45-30 722.00 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.45-30 95.00 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.45-30 400.00 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.45-30 95.00 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.49-90 31.68 Page 5 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 8 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 107.15 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 447.33 HD SUPPLY SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-01 2,026.24 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-01 156.15 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-01 252.63 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-01 1,461.10 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-01 4,666.68 NATIONAL SAFETY INC SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-01 4,387.58 PORT OF PORT ANGELES SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.45-30 5,548.50 RAINBOW SWEEPERS, INC SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.45-30 788.80 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.45-30 788.80 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.45-30 788.80 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 136.99 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-40 1,094.65 THURMAN SUPPLY SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 507.49 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 52.76 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 201.41 SUPPLIES 001-8080-576.31-20 45.77 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Replacement filter-wet/dr 001-8080-576.31-20 74.62 SYSTEM Pesticide license conveni 001-8080-576.49-90 1.50 Pesticide license-Keohoka 001-8080-576.49-90 50.00 WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS Hearing testing 001-8080-576.49-90 586.36 INC Parks Facilities Division Total: $29,509.28 Parks &Recreation Department Total: $30,473.15 ANGELES MILLWORK& LUMBER SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 17.14 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 28.31 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 131.90 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 30.64 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 73.14 CED/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 97.92 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 78.68 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 209.98 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 73.98 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 81.81 Page 6 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 9 City of Port Angeles ` City Council Expenditure Report Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 164.05 GRAINGER SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 73.44 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 159.22 HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 42.47 HD SUPPLY SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-01 98.71 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 6.40 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-01 81.05 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-01 52.34 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-01 63.00 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-01 117.11 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-01 1,326.36 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-01 1,883.03 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-01 27.55 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-01 39.02 NAPA AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 (11.19) SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 17.39 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY INC SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.48-10 6,250.30 THURMAN SUPPLY SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 5.31 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 32.62 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 70.11 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 102.75 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 99.99 SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.31-20 28.68 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP SUPPLIES 001-8131-518.48-10 1,392.53 Central Svcs Facilities Division Total: $12,945.74 SESAC, INC SUPPLIES 001-8155-575.41-50 Facility Rentals Division Total: $7.70 Facilities Maintenance Department Total: $12,953.44 CLALLAM CNTY TREASURER SUPPLIES 001-9029-518.47-10 205.69 General Unspecified Division Total: $205.69 Non-Departmental Department Total: $205.69 General Fund Fund Total: $112,023.53 LULISH DESIGN MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 101-1430-557.41-50 8,083.32 Lodging Excise Tax Division Total: $8,083.32 Lodging Excise Tax Department Total: $8,083.32 Page 7 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 10 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount Lodging Excise Tax Fund Total: $8,083.32 A-1 PERFORMANCE, INC BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 102-7230-542.41-50 135.29 ANGELES MILLWORK&LUMBER ROAD/HIGHWAY EQUIPMENT 102-7230-542.31-25 252.24 CORAL SALES COMPANY METALS,BARS,PLATES,RODS 102-7230-542.31-20 1,884.94 HD SUPPLY FOODS: STAPLE GROCERY 102-7230-542.31-01 343.81 MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE ADAMS-CDL PHYSICAL REIMBU 102-7230-542.49-90 175.00 REIMBURSEMENT OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 102-7230-542.31-01 33.56 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPP 102-7230-542.31-01 537.93 PUD#1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 102-7230-542.47-10 20.10 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC SHOES AND BOOTS 102-7230-542.31-01 152.21 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT IMSA member-Cameron/Medle 102-7230-542.49-01 200.00 SYSTEM Pesticide license-Hartley 102-7230-542.43-10 51.00 Pesticide recert webinars 102-7230-542.43-10 120.00 WASHINGTON (DOT), STATE OF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,GEN 102-7230-542.48-10 2,387.02 Reimb Roadside Maint 102-7230-542.48-10 (4,804.64) Reimb Roadside Maint 102-7230-542.48-10 10,888.06 Reimb Snow& Ice Maint 102-7230-542.48-10 208.62 WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS Hearing testing 102-7230-542.49-90 325.76 INC Street Division Total: $12,910.90 Public Works-Street Department Total: $12,910.90 Street Fund Total: $12,910.90 CENTURYLINK-QWEST 03-02 A/C 360ZO20380301 B 107-5160-528.42-11 216.07 PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC Q4 Subscription Fees 107-5160-528.41-50 179.00 QUILL CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 107-5160-528.31-01 503.32 SOUND PUBLISHING INC COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 107-5160-528.41-15 500.00 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Lodging-Hatton 107-5160-528.43-10 101.06 SYSTEM Job Posting-Dispatcher 107-5160-528.41-15 50.00 WAPRO membership-Craig 107-5160-528.43-10 25.00 WAPRO membership-O'Connor 107-5160-528.43-10 25.00 Yoga ball/kneeling chair 107-5160-528.31-01 276.87 Job posting-Dispatcher 107-5160-528.49-90 599.00 VOIANCE LANGUAGE SERVICES, MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 107-5160-528.42-11 15.24 LLC Pencom Division Total: $2,490.56 Page 8 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 11 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount Pencom Department Total: $2,490.56 Pencom Fund Total: $2,490.56 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPHE 310-5950-594.65-10 3,487.42 COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPHE 310-5950-594.65-10 1,814.57 COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPHE 310-5950-594.65-10 15,182.82 Homeland Security Division Total: $20,484.81 Public Safety Projects Department Total: $20,484.81 Capital Improvement Fund Total: $20,484.81 TANGRAM DESIGN ARCH ITECTURAL&EN GIN EERING 312-4160-595.65-10 15,960.00 Capital Project-Planning Division Total: $15,960.00 PA Housing Rehabilitation Department Total: $15,960.00 2 GRADE, LLC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,GEN 312-7930-595.65-10 5,809.92 PARAMETRIX INC CONSULTING SERVICES 312-7930-595.65-10 4,751.37 CONSULTING SERVICES 312-7930-595.65-10 11,727.27 GF-Street Projects Division Total: $22,288.56 Capital Projects-Pub Wks Department Total: $22,288.56 Transportation Benefit Fund Total: $38,248.56 BORDER STATES INDUSTRIES INC FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 401-0000-141.41-00 706.34 MISC UTILITY DEPOSIT REFUNDS FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 6.93 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 10.41 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 21.09 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 22.18 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 41.20 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 48.71 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 92.34 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 240.34 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 357.88 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 506.92 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 111.09 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 160.24 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 254.63 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 326.25 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 510.67 FINAL BILL REFUND 401-0000-122.10-99 88.71 REFUND-J&A PROPERTY MGMT 401-0000-122.10-99 146.10 Page 9 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 12 City of Port Angeles 1 City Council Expenditure Report Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount MISC UTILITY DEPOSIT REFUNDS OVERPAYMENT-1020 S LAUREL 401-0000-122.10-99 22.65 OVERPAYMENT-1323 MCDONALD 401-0000-122.10-99 39.63 OVERPAYMENT-1407 ROOK DR 401-0000-122.10-99 163.68 OVERPAYMENT-1415 S CHERRY 401-0000-122.10-99 150.64 OVERPAYMENT-1503 E LAURID 401-0000-122.10-99 866.87 OVERPAYMENT-202 E LAURIDS 401-0000-122.10-99 67.53 OVERPAYMENT-532 W 4TH ST 401-0000-122.10-99 38.31 OVERPAYMENT-732 W 5TH ST 401-0000-122.10-99 37.15 OVERPAYMENT-907 BENJAMIN 401-0000-122.10-99 112.24 OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP &SUPPLY 401-0000-141.42-00 3,823.13 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP &SUPPLY 401-0000-141.41-00 163.41 Division Total: $9,137.27 Department Total: $9,137.27 MISC TRAVEL SAIZ-NWPPA STAKING CERT P 401-7111-533.43-10 6.25 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Lodging-Saiz 401-7111-533.43-10 278.50 SYSTEM Airfare travel insurance- 401-7111-533.43-10 26.12 Airfare-Saiz 401-7111-533.43-10 417.99 Engineering-Electric Division Total: $728.86 MARSH MUNDORF PRATT CONSULTING SERVICES 401-7120-533.49-01 332.94 SULLIVAN Power Systems Division Total: $332.94 A-1 PERFORMANCE, INC BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 401-7180-533.41-50 318.56 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS 401-7180-533.31-01 360.00 ANGELES MILLWORK& LUMBER ELECTRICAL EQUIP &SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01 120.74 BILL'S PLUMBING & HEATING INC Sanikans 401-7180-533.47-10 190.00 CED/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST ELECTRICAL EQUIP &SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 565.76 COPPER CREEK FABRICATION EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 401-7180-533.48-10 459.39 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Excise Tax Returns-Feb 401-7180-533.44-50 96,249.73 FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRICAL EQUIP &SUPPLY 401-7180-533.31-01 22.17 KENNEDY, STEPHEN H. REAL PROPERTY,RENT/LEASE 401-7180-533.45-30 12,889.55 LUTZCO, INC. FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP/SUP 401-7180-533.31-01 176.61 MISC BUILDING PERMIT REFUNDS 401-7180-322.10-28 56.00 NORTHWEST SAFETY SERVICE, SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 401-7180-533.41-50 1,123.20 LLC OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP &SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 3,556.80 Page 10 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 13 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report Q' Between Mar 5f f 2022 and Mar 25 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP &SUPPLY 401-7180-533.31-01 34.21 SECURITY SERVICES NW, INC COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 401-7180-533.41-50 750.00 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC ELECTRICAL EQUIP &SUPPLY 401-7180-533.35-01 8.13 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Supplies 401-7180-533.31-01 18.49 SYSTEM LMS student kit-S Glenn 401-7180-533.43-10 889.13 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 401-7180-533.49-90 17.10 CTR WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS Hearing testing 401-7180-533.49-90 781.82 INC WESCO-ANIXTER ELECTRICAL EQUIP &SUPPLY 401-7180-533.34-02 388.42 Electric Operations Division Total: $118,975.81 Public Works-Electric Department Total: $120,037.61 Electric Utility Fund Total: $129,174.88 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 402-0000-141.40-00 1,222.52 PIPE FITTINGS 402-0000-141.40-00 149.75 PLUMBING EQUIP FIXT,SUPP 402-0000-141.40-00 523.94 PIPE FITTINGS 402-0000-141.40-00 264.95 PIPE FITTINGS 402-0000-141.40-00 1,060.04 Division Total: $3,221.20 Department Total: $3,221.20 CED/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST ELECTRICAL EQUIP &SUPPLY 402-7380-534.31-20 263.73 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Excise Tax Returns-Feb 402-7380-534.44-50 22,198.06 EDGE ANALYTICAL MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 402-7380-534.41-50 1,276.00 FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 402-7380-534.31-20 32.69 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP/SUP 402-7380-534.31-20 9,068.85 HARTNAGEL BUILDING SUPPLY INC HAND TOOLS ,POW&NON POWER 402-7380-534.35-01 390.59 LEITZ FARMS, INC LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 402-7380-534.35-01 3,580.49 LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP METALS,BARS,PLATES,RODS 402-7380-534.31-20 19.88 MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE ALDERSON-DOT PHYSICAL REI 402-7380-534.49-90 175.00 REIMBURSEMENT ROENING-CDL LICENSE RENEW 402-7380-534.49-90 136.00 PUD#1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY TRANSFER FEE 402-7380-534.48-10 8,670.00 SPECTRA LABORATORIES-KITSAP TESTING&CALIBRATION SERVI 402-7380-534.41-50 239.00 TESTING&CALIBRATION SERVI 402-7380-534.41-50 193.00 TESTING&CALIBRATION SERVI 402-7380-534.41-50 239.00 THURMAN SUPPLY PUMPS &ACCESSORIES 402-7380-534.31-20 173.21 Page 11 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 14 City of Port Angeles ` City Council Expenditure Report t4i;. .. Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount THURMAN SUPPLY PIPE FITTINGS 402-7380-534.31-20 27.29 SUPPLIES 402-7380-534.31-20 18.31 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Waterworks renewal-B Flor 402-7380-534.49-01 42.00 SYSTEM Waterworks renewal-Borte 402-7380-534.49-01 42.00 Waterworks renewal-E John 402-7380-534.49-01 42.00 Waterworks renewal-Edging 402-7380-534.49-01 42.00 Waterworks renewal-Holbro 402-7380-534.49-01 42.00 Waterworks renewal-J Grov 402-7380-534.49-01 42.00 Waterworks renewal-Leonar 402-7380-534.49-01 42.00 Waterworks renewal-M Hart 402-7380-534.49-01 42.00 Waterworks renewal-Woodwe 402-7380-534.49-01 42.00 Bottled water 402-7380-534.31-01 271.25 Buckets 5-gal (100) 402-7380-534.31-01 836.15 AWWA Reg-Hunter 402-7380-534.43-10 447.00 Ferry-Water Div 402-7380-534.43-10 33.60 USA BLUEBOOK CHEMICAL LAB EQUIP& SUPP 402-7380-534.31-05 607.10 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 402-7380-534.49-90 17.09 CTR WASHINGTON (DOH), STATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL&ECOLOGICAL 402-7380-534.49-90 11,255.70 WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS Hearing testing 402-7380-534.49-90 390.91 INC Water Division Total: $60,937.90 LEITZ FARMS, INC LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 402-7382-534.35-01 3,580.50 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES 402-7382-534.31-20 129.60 Industrial Water Treatmnt Division Total: $3,710.10 Public Works-Water Department Total: $64,648.00 Water Utility Fund Total: $67,869.20 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Excise Tax Returns-Feb 403-0000-237.00-00 Division Total: $28.01 Department Total: $28.01 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES COMPUTER HARDWARE&PERIPHE 403-7480-535.31-01 423.47 ANGELES ELECTRIC INC WATER SEWAGE TREATMENT EQ 403-7480-535.48-10 912.29 BRANOM INSTRUMENT COMPANY WATER SEWAGE TREATMENT EQ 403-7480-535.35-01 2,727.80 BUCK'S NORTHWEST ROADS IDE,GRN IDS,REC, PARK 403-7480-535.48-10 1,233.56 LANDSCAPING, LLC CED/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST ELECTRICAL EQUIP &SUPPLY 403-7480-535.31-20 101.93 Page 12 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 15 -- City of Port Angeles ` City Council Expenditure Report Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount CENTER ELECTRIC, INC EQUIP MAINT& REPAIR SERV 403-7480-535.48-10 924.80 EQUIP MAINT& REPAIR SERV 403-7480-535.48-10 1,251.20 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Excise Tax Returns-Feb 403-7480-535.44-50 18,056.60 EDGE ANALYTICAL MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 403-7480-535.41-50 823.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 403-7480-535.41-50 601.88 FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 403-7480-535.31-20 55.13 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP Shipping Charges 403-7480-535.42-10 24.39 Shipping Chgs 403-7480-535.42-10 38.12 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 1,031.75 PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 1,266.23 HOSES,ALL KINDS 403-7480-535.31-20 12.05 FIRE CHIEF EQUIPMENT CO, INC EQUIP MAINT& REPAIR SERV 403-7480-535.41-50 133.82 FOWLER COMPANY, H D PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 4,600.72 INTEGRITY PUMP SOLUTIONS, INC BEARINGS(EXCEPT WHEEL) 403-7480-535.31-20 457.91 JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY SECURITY,FIRE,SAFETY SERV 403-7480-535.41-50 190.28 SOLUTIONS MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO AIR CONDITIONING& HEATNG 403-7480-535.31-20 30.26 STEAM & HOT WATER FITTING 403-7480-535.31-20 79.80 MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE GAUL-MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 403-7480-535.31-01 55.50 REIMBURSEMENT M WILLIAMS-MEAL REIMBURSE 403-7480-535.31-01 37.00 WALDRON-MEAL REIMBURSEMEN 403-7480-535.31-01 37.00 NAPA AUTO PARTS AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 403-7480-535.31-20 104.90 OLYMPIC STATIONERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 403-7480-535.31-01 108.34 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC COMPUTER ACCESSORIES&SUPP 403-7480-535.31-01 428.82 PETROCARD, INC FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 403-7480-535.32-11 2,206.83 FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 403-7480-535.32-11 2,215.75 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 403-7480-535.31-20 68.14 POLYDYNE INC WATER&SEWER TREATING CHEM 403-7480-535.31-05 3,496.60 WATER&SEWER TREATING CHEM 403-7480-535.31-05 4,273.60 PUD#1 OF CLALLAM COUNTY MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 403-7480-535.47-10 366.52 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 403-7480-535.47-10 645.24 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-01 102.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 403-7480-535.31-01 99.76 FIRST AID &SAFETY EQUIP. 403-7480-535.31-01 108.66 HOSES,ALL KINDS 403-7480-535.31-01 16.58 Page 13 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 16 City of Port Angeles ` City Council Expenditure Report Qa .. Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC SHOES AND BOOTS 403-7480-535.31-01 152.21 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 403-7480-535.31-01 183.47 FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 403-7480-535.31-20 65.87 THURMAN SUPPLY PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 67.67 PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 67.67 PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 5.16 PIPE FITTINGS 403-7480-535.31-20 6.97 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 403-7480-535.35-01 11.41 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Pesticide license-Hartley 403-7480-535.49-90 52.00 SYSTEM WW collection cert(4) 403-7480-535.49-01 80.00 Pesticide recert webinars 403-7480-535.43-10 120.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 403-7480-535.49-90 17.09 CTR WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS Hearing testing 403-7480-535.49-90 521.22 INC Wastewater Division Total: $50,699.32 Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: $50,699.32 Wastewater Utility Fund Total: $50,727.33 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Excise Tax Returns-Feb 404-0000-237.10-00 147.66 Division Total: $147.66 Department Total: $147.66 ANGELES MILLWORK& LUMBER FASTENERS, FASTENING DEVS 404-7538-537.35-01 12.14 SUPPLIES 404-7538-537.35-01 36.12 FARE COLLECTION EQUIP&SUP 404-7538-537.31-01 22.45 BAXTER AUTO PARTS#15 SUPPLIES 404-7538-537.35-01 2,360.85 ELECTRICAL CABLES&WIRES 404-7538-537.31-01 17.22 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT&SUP 404-7538-537.31-01 82.98 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Excise Tax Returns-Feb 404-7538-537.44-50 20,826.81 EDGE ANALYTICAL MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 404-7538-537.41-50 364.00 FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 404-7538-537.31-01 22.84 FIRST AID &SAFETY EQUIP. 404-7538-537.31-01 211.00 FOSTER GARVEY PC Contract Dispute Adv 404-7538-537.41-50 72,766.45 HD SUPPLY PAPER& PLASTIC-DISPOSABL 404-7538-537.31-01 195.94 HI-TECH ELECTRONICS INC COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA SERV 404-7538-537.41-50 391.55 LINCOLN INDUSTRIAL CORP SUPPLIES 404-7538-537.35-01 555.76 Page 14 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 17 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE HOWELL-OFFICE SUPPLIES RE 404-7538-537.31-01 25.69 REIMBURSEMENT MISC TRAVEL EVANS-SWANA TRANSFER STAT 404-7538-537.43-10 380.20 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC FURNITURE, OFFICE 404-7538-537.31-01 484.60 SELLETON.COM SCALES/WEIGHING APPARATUS 404-7538-537.35-01 3,502.91 SOUND PUBLISHING INC PUBLICATION/AUDIOVISUAL 404-7538-537.41-15 107.44 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 404-7538-537.31-01 410.02 HOSP SURG ACCES& SUNDRIS 404-7538-537.31-01 78.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GENERAL 404-7538-537.31-01 24.89 FIRST AID &SAFETY EQUIP. 404-7538-537.31-01 201.69 OPTICAL EQUIP ACESS& SUPP 404-7538-537.31-01 343.68 CLOTHING&APPAREL 404-7538-537.31-01 576.86 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC MACHINERY& HEAVY HRDWARE 404-7538-537.35-01 916.17 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Postage-DOE req cert sign 404-7538-537.42-10 7.58 SYSTEM Pesticide license-Hartley 404-7538-537.49-90 52.00 Pesticide recert webinars 404-7538-537.43-10 120.00 Ferry-SW Div 404-7538-537.43-10 16.80 Ferry-SW Div 404-7538-537.43-10 16.80 iPad 404-7538-537.31-60 348.15 iPads(3) 404-7538-537.31-60 1,327.33 Refund-iPad-out of stock 404-7538-537.31-60 (489.59) WASTEQUIP MANUFACTURING CO SUPPLIES 404-7538-537.35-01 9,089.94 SW-Transfer Station Division Total: $115,407.98 A-1 PERFORMANCE, INC BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 404-7580-537.41-50 135.32 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Excise Tax Returns-Feb 404-7580-537.44-50 17,301.34 HD SUPPLY AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT&SUP 404-7580-537.31-01 32.71 MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE ADAMS-MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 404-7580-537.31-01 18.50 REIMBURSEMENT BRIDGES-MEAL REIMBURSEMEN 404-7580-537.31-01 55.50 CAMERON-MEAL REIMBURSEMEN 404-7580-537.31-01 55.50 HENKE-MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 404-7580-537.31-01 55.00 HENKE-MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 404-7580-537.31-01 55.00 HOWELL-MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 404-7580-537.31-01 55.50 PAYNTER-MEAL REIMBURSEMEN 404-7580-537.31-01 37.00 PAYNTER-MEAL REIMBURSEMEN 404-7580-537.31-01 37.00 RUTZ-MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 404-7580-537.31-01 55.50 Page 15 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 18 City of Port Angeles t ` City Council Expenditure Report r.. Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 ;+IA9S+k Vendor Description Account Number Amount MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE SAGE-MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 404-7580-537.31-01 18.50 REIMBURSEMENT SCOTT-MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 404-7580-537.31-01 37.00 TRUCKENMILLER-MEAL REIMBU 404-7580-537.31-01 55.50 RUDDELL AUTO MALL SUPPLIES 404-7580-537.31-20 2,363.68 SOLID WASTE SYSTEMS, INC RENTAL/LEASE EQUIPMENT 404-7580-537.45-30 11,315.20 WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS Hearing testing 404-7580-537.49-90 390.91 INC Solid Waste-Collections Division Total: $32,074.66 EDGE ANALYTICAL MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 404-7585-537.41-50 836.30 Solid Waste-Landfill Division Total: $836.30 Public Works-Solid Waste Department Total: $148,318.94 Solid Waste Utility Fund Total: $148,466.60 CLALLAM CNTY TREASURER 1%Stormwater Assessments 406-7412-538.41-50 25,048.41 CONTECH CONSTRUCTION Return Shipping 406-7412-538.31-20 255.00 PRODUCTS, INC FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 406-7412-538.31-20 1,016.34 HEARTLINE NURSERY STOCK& SUPPLIES 406-7412-538.31-20 174.08 NURSERY STOCK& SUPPLIES 406-7412-538.31-20 220.81 SONTETICS CORPORATION ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS 406-7412-538.48-10 870.40 SWAIN'S GENERAL STORE INC SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 406-7412-538.35-01 76.02 SUPPLIES 406-7412-538.31-01 45.24 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 406-7412-538.31-01 51.16 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Pesticide license-Hartley 406-7412-538.43-10 51.00 SYSTEM Pesticide recert webinars 406-7412-538.43-10 120.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 406-7412-538.49-90 17.09 CTR WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS Hearing testing 406-7412-538.49-90 260.61 INC Stormwater Division Total: $28,206.16 Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: $28,206.16 Stormwater Utility Fund Total: $28,206.16 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Excise Tax Returns-Feb 409-0000-237.00-00 16.62 Division Total: $16.62 Department Total: $16.62 CLALLAM CNTY EMS MEMBERSHIPS 409-6025-526.41-50 880.00 EMSCONNECT MEMBERSHIPS 409-6025-526.43-10 236.00 Page 16 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 19 City of Port Angeles t- F City Council Expenditure Report Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 ;+IA9S+k Vendor Description Account Number Amount EMSCONNECT Subscription 409-6025-526.43-10 250.00 JIM'S PHARMACY INC SALE SURPLUS/OBSOLETE 409-6025-526.31-13 43.57 LIFE ASSIST Supplies 409-6025-526.31-01 79.97 Supplies 409-6025-526.31-01 298.59 Supplies 409-6025-526.31-01 1,276.15 Supplies 409-6025-526.31-13 380.99 Supplies 409-6025-526.31-01 464.71 Supplies 409-6025-526.31-01 1,034.54 Supplies 409-6025-526.31-13 228.00 Supplies 409-6025-526.31-01 157.76 Supplies 409-6025-526.31-13 101.70 Supplies 409-6025-526.31-01 99.01 MISC EMPLOYEE EXPENSE Boots 409-6025-526.20-80 201.28 REIMBURSEMENT Boots 409-6025-526.20-80 (201.28) MISC TRAVEL SCHOONHOVEN-PARAMEDIC SCH 409-6025-526.43-10 655.50 OLYMPIC LAUNDRY& DRY LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 409-6025-526.41-50 35.03 CLEANERS Medic I Division Total: $6,221.52 Fire Department Total: $6,221.52 Medic I Utility Fund Total: $6,238.14 ALL WEATHER HEATING AND CITY REBATE-DUCTLESS HEAT 421-7121-533.49-86 500.00 COOLING CITY REBATE-DUCTLESS HEAT 421-7121-533.49-86 800.00 CITY REBATE-DUCTLESS HEAT 421-7121-533.49-86 800.00 CITY REBATE-DUCTLESS HEAT 421-7121-533.49-86 800.00 CITY REBATE-DUCTLESS HEAT 421-7121-533.49-86 800.00 DAVE'S HEATING &COOLING SVC CITY REBATE-DUCTLESS HEAT 421-7121-533.49-86 800.00 Conservation Division Total: $4,500.00 Public Works-Electric Department Total: $4,500.00 Conservation Fund Total: $4,500.00 CED/CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST ELECTRICAL EQUIP &SUPPLY 451-7188-594.65-10 678.48 Electric Projects Division Total: $678.48 Public Works-Electric Department Total: $678.48 Electric Utility CIP Fund Total: $678.48 INTERWEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,HEA 452-7388-594.65-10 3,607.06 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS CONSULTING SERVICES 452-7388-594.65-10 4,552.23 Page 17 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 20 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount Water Projects Division Total: $8,159.29 Public Works-Water Department Total: $8,159.29 Water Utility CIP Fund Total: $8,159.29 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS WWTP Comp Plan 453-7488-594.65-10 66,588.75 CONSULTING SERVICES 453-7488-594.65-10 34,743.93 Wastewater Projects Division Total: $101,332.68 Public Works-WW/Stormwtr Department Total: $101,332.68 Wastewater Utility CIP Fund Total: $101,332.68 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 211.51 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 501-0000-141.20-00 7,097.33 PRODUCTS, INC BAXTER AUTO PARTS#15 AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 7.96 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 258.68 BICKFORD FORD INC. AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 97.50 DON SMALL& SONS OIL DIST CO. AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 441.83 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 1,555.52 HEARTLINE AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 710.25 N C MACHINERY CO AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 404.42 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 320.22 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 963.97 NAPA AUTO PARTS AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 (1.93) AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 21.58 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 56.01 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 32.84 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 44.93 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 307.21 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 55.23 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 219.13 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 116.92 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 35.66 PAPE-KENWORTH NORTHWEST, AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 40.43 INC AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 533.87 PENINSULA LUBRICANTS AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 350.16 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 51.90 FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 501-0000-141.40-00 25.37 Page 18 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 21 City of Port Angeles ` City Council Expenditure Report Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount PENINSULA LUBRICANTS AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 103.47 PETROCARD, INC FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 501-0000-141.20-00 936.34 SIX ROBBLEES' INC AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 128.82 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 29.60 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 9.95 SOLID WASTE SYSTEMS, INC AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 376.55 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 4,257.09 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 5,633.75 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 126.99 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTRIB AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 356.27 INC LAWN MAINTENANCE EQUIP 501-0000-141.40-00 217.41 WILDER TOYOTA INC AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-0000-141.40-00 90.79 Division Total: $26,225.53 Department Total: $26,225.53 A-1 PERFORMANCE, INC BUILDING MAINT&REPAIR SER 501-7630-548.41-50 162.63 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 787.05 ARAMARK LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 501-7630-548.49-90 20.28 LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 501-7630-548.49-90 20.28 LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING SERV 501-7630-548.49-90 20.28 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM FUEL,OIL,GREASE, & LUBES 501-7630-548.32-13 53.36 PRODUCTS, INC BAXTER AUTO PARTS#15 AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.31-01 30.25 BICKFORD FORD INC. AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 323.89 DAREN'S POINT S AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 953.38 EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 86.79 FAR-WEST MACHINE & EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 343.80 HYDRAULICS FREIGHTLINER NORTHWEST AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 224.12 HEARTLINE AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 49.94 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 517.78 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 155.53 HECKMAN MOTORS, INC EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 330.00 INDUSTRIAL HYDRAULICS EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 1,903.58 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 1,653.61 EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 130.56 Page 19 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 22 City of Port Angeles ` City Council Expenditure Report t4i;. .. Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 47.78 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 878.09 EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 82.76 EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 160.54 MATT'S TOOLS USA, LLC AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 238.23 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.35-01 83.38 MOTOR TRUCKS INC AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 434.10 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 995.72 NAPA AUTO PARTS AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 172.60 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.31-01 40.11 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 229.88 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 (47.87) NORTHWEST PUMP AND AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.49-90 459.10 EQUIPMENT CO O'REILLY AUTO PARTS AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.31-01 25.98 AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 95.11 PENINSULA LUBRICANTS AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.31-01 45.92 PORT ANGELES LOCKWORKS EXTERNAL LABOR SERVICES 501-7630-548.34-02 167.55 RUDDELL AUTO MALL AUTO&TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 (54.40) AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 41.87 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC AUTO &TRUCK MAINT. ITEMS 501-7630-548.34-02 73.74 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Bridge toll-Veh#1891 501-7630-548.49-90 14.50 SYSTEM Good To Go Account 501-7630-548.49-90 60.00 WASHINGTON AUDIOLOGY SVCS Hearing testing 501-7630-548.49-90 195.46 INC Equipment Services Division Total: $12,207.26 Public Works Department Total: $12,207.26 Equipment Services Fund Total: $38,432.79 ASTOUND BROADBAND DATA PROC SERV&SOFTWARE 502-2081-518.42-12 22,216.79 CENTURYLINK-QWEST 02-05 A/C 206ZO50031846B 502-2081-518.42-10 2,715.46 CITIES DIGITAL DATA PROC SERV&SOFTWARE 502-2081-518.48-02 25,756.22 EXP TECHNICAL INC CONSULTING SERVICES 502-2081-518.41-50 288.75 CONSULTING SERVICES 502-2081-518.41-50 701.25 PACIFIC OFFICE EQUIPMENT INC OFFICE MACHINES&ACCESS 502-2081-518.45-31 1,590.15 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Sheet metal screws (SCADA 502-2081-518.35-01 13.04 SYSTEM Page 20 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 23 City of Port Angeles City Council Expenditure Report Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Cordless drill/vac(SCADA 502-2081-518.35-01 298.08 SYSTEM Drill bits(SCADA) 502-2081-518.35-01 57.28 ID tags for equipment 502-2081-518.31-01 18.38 Webex licensing 502-2081-518.48-02 418.88 Radio bridge-CAM project 502-2081-518.31-60 377.48 Webex user licenses(20) 502-2081-518.48-02 434.11 VERIZON WIRELESS 02-05 A/C 542276284-00001 502-2081-518.42-10 92.31 02-15 A/C 842160242-00001 502-2081-518.42-10 4,041.69 02-15 A/C 842160242-00003 502-2081-518.42-10 1,092.03 02-15 A/C 842160242-00004 502-2081-518.42-10 6,218.08 02-22 A/C 571136182-00001 502-2081-518.42-10 173.93 Information Technologies Division Total: $66,503.91 Finance Department Total: $66,503.91 Information Technology Fund Total: $66,503.91 HSA BANK HSA Contributions 503-1631-517.46-30 3,000.00 HSA Contributions 503-1631-517.46-30 16,500.00 NW ADMIN TRANSFER ACCT INSURANCE,ALL TYPES 503-1631-517.46-33 82,935.55 INSURANCE,ALL TYPES 503-1631-517.46-34 6,497.00 REDQUOTE, INC. HRA REIMBURSEMENTS 503-1631-517.46-30 143.06 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Wellness Supplies 503-1631-517.41-51 33.24 SYSTEM Wellness Supplies 503-1631-517.41-51 35.97 Other Insurance Programs Division Total: $109,144.82 AWC-ASSN OF WASHINGTON 2022 AWC WORKERS COMP RET 503-1661-517.49-50 28,382.73 CITIES WASHINGTON HOSPITAL SVCS MARCH 2O22 FEE CONTRACT 503-1661-517.41-40 750.00 Worker's Compensation Division Total: $29,132.73 AWC-ASSN OF WASHINGTON 2022 AWC DRUG&ALCOHOL CON 503-1671-517.41-50 2,730.00 CITIES Comp Liability Division Total: $2,730.00 Self Insurance Department Total: $141,007.55 Self-Insurance Fund Total: $141,007.55 AFSCME LOCAL 1619 PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.54-40 480.00 BROWN & BROWN OF PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.53-40 2,146.11 WASHINGTON CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE Case#21-10696 920-0000-231.56-90 358.00 EMPOWER-P/R WIRE PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.52-20 24,180.90 Page 21 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 24 City of Port Angeles ` City Council Expenditure Report Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 Vendor Description Account Number Amount EMPOWER-P/R WIRE PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.52-20 23,329.26 FEDERAL PAYROLL TAX PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.50-10 77,656.75 PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.50-10 81,570.80 Pensioner's P/R 920-0000-231.50-10 200.00 FICA/MEDICARE PAYROLL TAX PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.50-20 91,717.92 PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.50-20 89,203.66 FIREFIGHTER'S LOCAL 656 PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.54-30 2,761.25 HSA BANK HSA Contributions 920-0000-231.52-40 9,590.58 HSA Contributions 920-0000-231.52-40 (9,590.58) PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.53-11 100.00 PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.53-12 301.54 HSA Contributions 920-0000-231.52-40 4,473.92 PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.53-11 100.00 PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.53-12 301.54 IBEW LOCAL 997 PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.54-20 1,339.95 JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.52-25 2,063.40 CO PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.52-25 2,063.40 LEOFF PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.51-21 112.60 PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.51-21 33,344.93 MISSION SQUARE-P/R WIRES PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.52-10 23,144.39 PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.52-10 25,609.84 OFFICE OF SUPPORT PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.56-20 260.76 ENFORCEMENT PIERS PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.51-10 898.04 PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.51-11 13,494.66 PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.51-12 74,584.83 POLICE ASSOCIATION PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.55-10 377.00 UNITED WAY (PAYROLL) PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.56-10 200.00 WSCCCE AFSCME AFL-CIO PAYROLL SUMMARY 920-0000-231.54-40 5,716.43 Division Total: $582,091.88 Department Total: $582,091.88 Payroll Clearing Fund Total: $582,091.88 Total for Checks Dated Between Mar 5, 2022 and Mar 25, 2022 $1,567,630.57 Page 22 of 22 Mar 25, 2022 1:53:13 PM April 5, 2022 E - 25 POR-T-ANGELES CITY COUNCIL WASH I N G T O N , U . S . MEMO Date: Apri15,2022 To: City Council From: Corey Delikat,Parks & Recreation Director Subject: City Pier Transient Moorage Float Replacement Summary: In October of 2021, an easterly storm swept through the harbor and damaged the main section of the City Pier Transient Moorage Floats. Funding: The cost to replace this section of the float is $54,126.00. Washington Cities Insurance Association(WCIA)will cover$29,126 and the additional $25,000 will come from the City. Funding is available in the 2022 City budget in the self-insurance fund for this claim. Recommendation: (1)Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign a contract with Topper Floats and; (2)Make minor modifications to the agreement,if necessary. Background / Analysis: In October of 2021, an easterly storm swept through the harbor and damaged the main section of the City Pier Transient Moorage Floats. This section needs to be repaired before any of the floats can be installed in 2022. This storm happened over a weekend,one day prior to the City removing the floats and storing them for the winter. Since then the City has been working with Washington Cities Insurance Association and,the original builder of floats,Topper Floats over the last several months to get this section replaced. The quote from Topper Floats is$54,126.00. The biggest issue Topper Floats is facing is that glulams for the float is the long lead item at 7-9 weeks once ordered. That would put Topper Floats estimating that this would take 10 to 13 weeks for delivery of our new float,putting us into July before the City Pier Transient Moorage Floats could be installed. Per our City's Legal team,this purchase doesn't need to go back out to bid because the cost of the repair for a single craft unit is below$75,500. Funding Overview: The cost to replace this section of the float is $54,126.00. Washington Cities Insurance Association (WCIA)will cover$29,126 and the additional$25,000 will come from the City. Funding is available in the 2022 City budget in the self-insurance fund for this claim. April 5, 2022 E - 26 Proposal / Contract WA-TOPPE11121OR OR- 128371 CA-776888 TOPPER INDUSTRIES I, LLC P.O.Box 2390 Woodland,WA. 98674 Phone (360) 841-8320/Fax (360)841-8021 Date: 03/24/2022 Client: City of Port Angeles ATTN:Leon Leonard,Corey Delikat Client Address: 321 East Fifth Street Port Angeles,Washington 98362 Phone: 360-912-1249 Email lleonard(dcityfpa.us cdelikat(aicityofpa.us Delivery: Port Angeles,Washington Project Name: City Float Replacement We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: Item ID One (1) each 8'-0" x 48'-0" Topper Heavy Duty Glue Laminated Timber Frame Floating Dock, to include; 1. Coastal Doug Fir Glue Laminated timber frame, 24F-v8, Industrial, no camber, incised and pressure treated ACZA 0.60. 2. Interior #1 or better Coastal Doug Fir, S4S, incised and pressure treated ACZA 0.60. 3. CDX plywood diaphragm, pressure treated ACZA .60. 4. Fibergrate Ecograte 62% open, molded, ADA compliant, skid resistant, fiberglass deck. 5. All steel hot dipped galvanized. 6. Six sided, polyethylene encased tub floats, filled with expanded polystyrene foam block. 7. All fasteners are hot dipped galvanized. 8. Three (3) each 12" heavy duty cast ship cleats. 9. Two (2) each external pile retainers lined with UHMW wear plates. 10.Seventy Four (74) In.ft. of 2" x 8" timber rub rail. 11.Two (2) each Topper heavy duty hinges. 12. Drawings for review / approval. Freight — FOB job site truck, Port Angeles, Washington... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ....$48,888.00 * Twenty Four (24) each Topper 4 Barrel Hinge Pins... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ....$996.00 * Fifty Five (55) pile wear blocks... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .........$4,242.00 * Project total... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......$54,126.00 * We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor; complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: Fifty Four Thousand One Hundred Twenty Six and 00/100 dollars ( $54,126.00 ). Terms: 20%down payment, 50%upon approved submittals,30%net 20 days delivery. *Note that sales tax is not included in the price stated above,if applicable. Acceptance of Proposal: The above scope is to be.furnished complete in general accordance with plans and specifications. Pavment and delivery terms to be negotiated.All prices shown are valid for thirty(30) days only unless otherwise stated above. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, the information herein is a proposal only and should not be construed as a promise to peform absent the separate written consent of Topper Industries I LLC. ExclusioJus,r� y to � Ij�ted, Buv America/Buy American if not previously mentioned will not be included, any sped n bevond vzs al, so e tax,permits,prevailingwa e, material escalation costs, liquidated damages, installation o brine-Lcaiwalk- gangway-dock, etc., consequential damages, mill delays, any proposed modification to the scope of work will be processed as a change order, includes one design revision to engineering, any further revisions at the customer's request will be billed at our engineering hourly rate in the form of a change order, Topper Industries I LLC, Terms and Conditions are to be signed. Signature: Date of Acceptance: G:\Shared drives\l-Sales\ Bruce\2021 Bids&Proposals\12-December\City of Port Angeles 1221\Quote&Budget\Support Document for Quote\City of Port Angeles Dock Replacement 0322.docx April 5, 2022 E - 28 tfM POR-T-ANGELES CITY COUNCIL WASH I N G T o N , U.S, MEMO Date: April 5,2022 To: City Council From: Thomas Hunter,Director ofPublic Works & Utilities Subject: Utility Wooden Power Poles—Material Purchase Summary: This memo requests approval to restock the City's inventory of wooden electric utility poles. Recent testing of approximately 10%of the City's wooden electric utility poles found 41 located throughout the City needing replacement. Bids were requested for the purchase of 70 wooden electric utility poles. On March 18, 2022 one bid was received from Stella-Jones Corporation at a price of$84,513.66. Funding:Funds are available for material inventory in the 2022 Electric Utility budget(401-7180-533.34- 02).The total contract amount for these replacements is $84,513.66. Recommendation: Award a contract to Stella-Jones Corporation of Tacoma,WA for 70 wooden poles at a price of$84,513.66 including sales tax and authorize the City Manager to sign and to make minor modifications to the contract if necessary. Background / Analysis: This procurement will restock the City's wooden pole inventory. On November 3, 2021, the City Council authorized the City to hire a contractor to inspect the integrity of approximately 10% of the City's electric utility poles. During the inspection 41 poles were found to be at risk, including 4 BPA switch yard exit poles. The new poles will be used in ongoing work activities including new pole installation and replacement of existing poles as needed throughout the City. One bid was received. A bid summary is provided below. Material Purchase Contract,MEC-2022-08(Prices Include Freight and Sales Tax) Government Estimate $ 72,100.00 Vendor Description Qty Total Price Stella-Jones Corporation—Alternate Wooden Power Poles 70 $84,513.66 Preservative Funding Overview: Funds are available in the 2022 Electric Utility Operation Budget (401-7180-533.34-02). April 5, 2022 E - 29 tfM POR-T-ANGELES CITY COUNCIL WASH I N G T o N , U.S, MEMO Date: April 5,2022 To: City Council From: Thomas Hunter,Director ofPublic Works& Utilities Subject: 20-inch Emergency Water Line Repair, CON 2021-49,Final Acceptance Summary: The purpose of this memo is to obtain City Council final acceptance for the work performed by Interwest Construction (ICI),Inc. of Burlington WA to repair a 40-foot section of the 20-inch water line. The work was inspected and accepted as complete with the final project costs amounting to $112,576.85 including taxes, a 5% retainage is being held. Funding: Funds are included in the first amendment to the 2022 budget amendment in the Water capital account(452-7388-594-6510) as part of project WT0521 in the amount of$112,576.85. Recommendation: Accept the 20-inch Emergency Water Line Repair Project No. CON 2021-49 as complete, and authorize staff to proceed with project closeout, and release the 5%retainage upon receipt of all required clearances. Background/Analysis: On Saturday,December 4,2021,City Crews discovered a water main leak on the 20-inch concrete cylinder water transmission main west of Ennis Creek near Lindberg Rd and Maddock Road. At this location the water main is approximately 10-feet below grade. City crews shut down the water main and began repair work on December 10, 2021, in conjunction with a limited Public Works contract with 2 Grade Excavation of Port Angeles,WA. However,the repair was unsuccessful due to poor soil conditions that made continued work unsafe; when uncovered,the waterline failure was significantly larger than anticipated and included an extreme offset. The failed segment of main is a critical component of the City's water distribution system. This main was installed in the 1960s and serves as the primary water source for the Clallam County PUD Round Tree Reservoir,PUD customers who receive water from the reservoir and 37 City of Port Angeles customers. On December 13,2021 the City Manager signed a"Declaration of Emergency"due to the severity of the break,the depth and location of the excavation, and hazards associated with the adjacent slope and large trees. This declaration was ratified by City Council on January 4,2022. The City contracted with ICI of Burlington Washington to perform the 20-inch water line repair. ICI subcontracted Blue Mountain Tree Service to fall,chip, and remove hazard trees located on the slope above the excavation. The total cost,including taxes,is tabulated in the following table: Force Account Project Cost Summary Original Contract Change Unit Quantity Final Cost Project Cost Variance Amount(NTE) Orders Variations $150,000 $0 ($0) $112,576.85 NA Funding: Funds are included in the first amendment to the 2022 budget amendment in the Water capital account(452-7388-594-6510) as part of project WT0521 in the amount of$112,576.85. April 5, 2022 E - 30 tfM POR-T-ANGELES CITY COUNCIL WASH I N G T o N , u , s , MEMO Date: Apri15,2022 To: City Council From: Emma Bolin,Interim Director of Community and Economic Development Subject: Milwaukee Trails Subdivision Development NICE funds request and Development Agreement Summary: The Milwaukee Trails Subdivision developer requested New Improvements for Community Enhancement of Neighborhoods(NICE) funding to complete required north side 14t1i Street right of way frontage improvements. The developer proposed match work in the south side 14t1i Street right of way. The project will be a catalyst for future housing development,ensures no deferred City infrastructure needed, and supports the City's Strategic Plan Item of Critical Importance on Housing. Staff prepared a development agreement per RCW 36.70B Local Project Review Act to execute with the developer if funding is approved.The City Hearing Examiner approved the subdivision; however, a public hearing is required for the proposed development agreement. Funding: Funding has been identified as not to exceed $43,969 developer reimbursement upon completion of the Subdivision Phase I and 2 Final Infill Overlay Zone Ordinance using NICE fund GG0303. $75,000 is allocated annually to this fund for NICE requests.There are currently no other projects utilizing NICE funds. Recommendation: 1.) Open the public hearing and after closing the hearing; 2.)Pass the resolution to approving Milwaukee Trail Subdivision Development agreement. Background / Analysis: The request: The developers of the Milwaukee Trails Subdivision requested New Improvements for Community Enhancement of Neighborhoods(NICE) fund in the amount of$43,969 for public street infrastructure in the 14th Street right of way that will support a 38-unit subdivision. The money would fund constructing sidewalk and a connection to the Olympic Discovery Trail on the north side of 14' Street. hi exchange for funding this request,the developer will exceed a funding match by constructing sidewalk on the south side of 14t1i Street,which is above and beyond the conditions of subdivision approval.When the project is completed,the entire stretch of unfinished street fronting the subdivision and portions to the east and west will be finished. It is hoped that the subdivision will be a catalyst to develop other undeveloped parcels in the area with the finished right of way. The subdivision must provide 20% of the residences as attainable housing,which will be satisfied with cottages in Phase 3. It also provides a mix of building types including single household dwellings—some with alley access,cottage housing, and duplexes. Attainable housing means housing for sale or rent that requires a monthly housing cost,including utilities other than telephone,of no more than 30 percent of the net income of an eligible household. An eligible household is one with a April 5, 2022 F - 1 total net household income no greater than 120 percent of the Clallam County median income as reported by the Washington State Office of Financial Management. NICE background:NICE is a tool enabled by City Council Resolution No 5-04 to fund public infrastructure improvements to electric,water,wastewater, stormwater,or streets to stimulate economic development and community reinvestment. The concept is that capital infrastructure improvements add value to adjacent property and stimulate private sector investment and redevelopment to upgrade a neighborhood and increase the tax base for overall revenue generation of the community. This is a revolving program,if a specific economic development need is not addressed each year the fund accumulates for future projects. These funds are transferred to other funds/divisions for viable projects which enhance economic development and community reinvestment within the City, specifically in the City's residential or commercial districts that permit medium to high density residential development.In this instance staff recommends using this program to address the community's housing needs by supporting residential development in one of the City's medium density residential developments. The review process: The developer received an infill overlay zone approval in a residential medium density zone from the City's Hearing Examiner to integrate open space in conjunction with net residential densities that achieve double the minimum unit per acre development potential. The infill overlay zone is designed to provide alternative zoning regulations that encourage design flexibility and promote infill, maximum density, attainable housing, and functional innovation that is transit and pedestrian oriented. This subdivision,with sidewalks throughout and connections to several open space areas and the Olympic Discovery Trail,offers this pedestrian-oriented living design. The developer, as a condition of approval must develop frontage adjacent to the subdivision. Developers struggle with this requirement while maintaining ability to achieve attainable housing pricing.NICE funds are a way to prime private investment to help achieve the City's House America goals to increasing housing units in the development pipeline. It also achieves the City's Strategic Plan Issue of Critical Importance: Housing and Homeless, and a focus area to increase the number of overall housing units and affordable units built and decrease the percentage of family income spent on housing and utilities. In order to ensure fairness and a precedent for future potential requests, as condition of NICE funding approval,the developer must accomplish additional right of way work that would complete the section of 14' Street on both north and south sides.The developer has agreed and provided a cost estimate showing the work contribution will exceed a 50%match for the NICE funding.Upon project completion,the City will not have deferred right of way installation adjacent to the subdivision.The proposal adds to the completeness of the neighborhood and may attract additional investment into subdividing adjacent underdeveloped parcels;thereby adding value to adjacent property,potentially stimulating private sector investment further, and increasing the tax base for overall revenue generation to the community. In the interest of transparency and equity, staff prepared a development agreement under RCW 36.70B.170-210 for consideration. Development agreements require a public hearing. The agreement vests the development standards provided in the hearing examiner's conditions of approval, stipulates NICE funding terms, and requires additional public improvement work for the developer to construct.The Development Agreement requires completion of Phases 1 and 2 in the subdivision prior to reimbursement,which includes 14 housing units,two open space tracts,internal walking path, and Olympic Discovery Trail connection. hi closing,this is the first private housing development request the City has evaluated. For future requests, CED will be developing a process for future applications to include a narrative detailing how the April 5, 2022 F - 2 project adds value to adjacent property and stimulates private sector investment and redevelopment, a cost proposal with prevailing wages, and a description of public infrastructure to be built at developer's cost as well as any appropriate details Council deems important in their decision-making process. Funding Overview: N/A Attachment: Proposed Resolution,Proposed Development Agreement with Exhibits A-E, April 5, 2022 F - 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, approving Milwaukee Trails Subdivision Development NICE funds request and Development Agreement. WHEREAS, the developers of the Milwaukee Trails Subdivision have requested New Improvements for Community Enhancement of Neighborhoods (NICE) funds in the amount of $43,969 from fund GG0303 for public street infrastructure in the 14th Street right of way that will support a 38-unit subdivision; and WHEREAS,NICE is a fund created by City Council Resolution No 5-04 to support public infrastructure improvements to electric, water, wastewater, stormwater, or streets to stimulate economic development and community reinvestment. Capital infrastructure improvements add value to adjacent property and stimulate private sector investment and redevelopment to upgrade a neighborhood and increase the tax base for overall revenue generation of the community; and WHEREAS, addressing the community's housing needs by supporting residential development is a City priority; and WHEREAS,NICE funds support and encourage private development investment to help achieve the City's House America goals to increase housing. The funds also contribute to achieving the City's Strategic Plan Issue of Critical Importance: Housing and Homeless,with a focus to increase the number of overall housing units and affordable units built and decrease the percentage of family income spent on housing and utilities. WHEREAS, in this instance, the funds will result in construction of a sidewalk and a connection to the Olympic Discovery, and the value of the construction work will exceed a 50% match for the NICE funding; and WHEREAS,the developer received an infill overlay zone approval in a residential medium density zone from the City's Hearing Examiner to integrate open space in conjunction with net residential densities that achieve double the minimum unit per acre development potential. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles that the City Manager is authorized to commit an amount not to exceed $43,969 in NICE funds with developer reimbursement upon completion of the Subdivision Phase 1 and 2 Final Infill Overlay Zone Ordinance using fund No. GG0303. April 5, 2022 F - 4 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of 2022. Kate Dexter, Mayor ATTEST: Kari Martinez-Bailey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William E. Bloor, City Attorney April 5, 2022 F - 5 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES AND DENNIS YAKOVICH FOR THE MILWAUKEE TRAILS SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of April, 2022, by and between the City of Port Angeles, a code city organized under the laws of the State of Washington, hereinafter the "City," and Rustic Elements LLC and Double W Group LLC as tenants in common, hereinafter the "Developer." RECITALS WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature has authorized the execution of a development agreement between a local government and a person having ownership orcontrol of real property within its jurisdiction(RCW 36.7013.170(1)); and WHEREAS, a development agreement must set forth the development standardsand other provisions that shall apply to, govern and vest the development, use and mitigation of the development of the real property for the duration specified in the agreement (RCW 36.70B.170(1)); and WHEREAS, for the purposes of this development agreement, "developmentstandards" includes, but is not limited to, all of the standards listed in RCW 36.7013.170(3); and WHEREAS, a development agreement must be consistent with the applicable development regulations adopted by a local government planning under chapter 36.70ARCW (RCW 36.7013.170(1)); and WHEREAS, this Development Agreement by and between the City of Port Angeles and the Developer(hereinafter the "Development Agreement"), relates to the development known as Milwaukee Trails Subdivision, which is located at: West 14th Street adjacent to Milwaukee Trails subdivision, (hereinafter the"Property" or"Subject Property"); and WHEREAS, by Ordinance 3294 the City enacted Chapter 17.45 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code, which created an Infill Overlay Zones designed to provide alternative zoning regulations that permit and encourage design flexibility through the implementation of smart growth practices to promote infill, maximum density, attainable housing, and functional innovation in developments that are both transit and pedestrian oriented and which blend into the character of the existing neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, by Ordinance 3621, the City adopted the City's Amended Comprehensive Plan in which the Property was designated between the Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential designations; 1 April 5, 2022 F - 6 WHEREAS, the following events have occurred in the processing of the Developer's application: a) The Developer made a request for approval to create a 32 to 37 lot subdivision in five phases, as an Infill Overlay Zone development, on approximately 7.66 acres at the southeast intersection of Milwaukee Boulevard and West 14th Street; b) The request was heard by a Hearing Examiner on November 7,2019 in an open record public hearing; c) The request was approved, with conditions that were deemed necessary to mitigate specific impacts from the proposal; d) A copy of the Findings, Conclusions and Decision of the Hearing Examiner Nos. 19- 53 and 19-54, approving the request and containing the conditions for development, is attached to this Development Agreement, and made a part of the Development Agreement by reference. WHEREAS, following a public hearing conducted pursuant to RCW 36.70B.200 by Resolution the City Council authorized the Mayor to sign this Development Agreement with the Developer. Now, therefore, the Parties hereto agree as follows: General Provisions Section 1. The Project. The Project is the development and use of the Property, consisting of approximately 7.66 acres in the City of Port Angeles to create a 32 to 37 lot subdivision in five phases, as an Infill Overlay Zone development, at the southeast intersection of Milwaukee Boulevard and West 14th Street, The request submitted to the Department of Commerce and Economic Development describes the Project as a 32 to 37 lot subdivision of a design that will create a neighborhood that the City currently does not have. As additional consideration for the benefits granted to the Developer in this Agreement, the Developer also agrees to complete additional improvements to public infrastructure as specified below. Section 2. The Subject Property. The Project site is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. Definitions. As used in this Development Agreement, the following terms, phrases and words shall have the meanings and be interpreted as set forth in thisSection. a) "Adopting Resolution" means the Resolution which approves this Development Agreement, as required by RCW 36.70B.200. b) "Additional Improvements" means development in the right-of-way fronting the property to tie into sidewalk connectivity to the Olympic Discovery Trail on the south side of 14th St, and to the East property line, specifically sidewalk, and curb ramps as shown in 2 April 5, 2022 F - 7 Exhibit B. The additional improvements are located adjacent to,but not on,the Project site. c) "Council"or"City Council"means the duly elected legislative body governing the City of Port Angeles. d) "Design Guidelines" means the Urban Services Standards & Guidelines, as adopted by the City e) "Director" means the City's Director of Community and Economic Development. f) "Effective Date"means the effective date of the Adopting Resolution. g) "Existing Land Use Regulations" means the ordinances adopted by the City Council of Port Angeles in effect on the Effective Date, including the adopting ordinances that govern the permitted uses of land, the density and intensity of use, and the design, improvement, construction standards and specifications applicable to the development of the Subject Property, including, but not limited to the Comprehensive Plan, the City's Official Zoning Map and development standards, the Design Guidelines, the Public Works Standards, SEPA, Concurrency Ordinance, and all other ordinances, codes, rules and regulations of the City establishing subdivision standards, park regulations, building standards. Existing Land Use Regulation does not include non-land use regulations, which includes taxes and impact fees. h) "Landowner"or is the party who has acquired any portion of the SubjectProperty from the Developer who, unless otherwise released as provided in this Agreement, shall be subject to the applicable provisions of this Agreement. The "Developer" is identified in Section 5 of this Agreement. i) "Project" means the anticipated development of the Subject Property, as specified in Section 1 and as provided for in all associated permits/approvals, and allincorporated Exhibits. j) "Authorized representative" Dennis Yakovich is authorized representative for Rustic Elements LLC and Steve Wirth is authorized representative for Double W Group LLC and are both fully empowered to sign this agreement on behalf of their LLC's. Section 4. Exhibits. Exhibits to this Agreement are as follows: a) Exhibit A—Legal description of the Subject Property. b) Exhibit B — Map showing Development Phases, including the additional improvements. c) Exhibit C —Findings, Conclusions, and Decision of Hearing Examiner, Nos. 19- 53 and 19-54. d) Exhibit D — Letter dated January 22, 2022 from Dennis Yakovich to City Manager West and Interim Director of Commerce and Economic Development Emma Bolin. e) Exhibit E—Prevailing Wage Rates 3 April 5, 2022 F - 8 Section 5. Parties to Development Agreement. The Parties to this Agreement are: a) The "City"is the City of Port Angeles, 321 East 5th Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362. b) The "Developer"is Rustic Elements LLC and Double W Group LLC, which own the Subject Property in fee, and whose principal office is located at 1424 Rook Drive, Port Angeles, WA 98362. c) "Landowner." From time to time, as provided in this Agreement, the Developer may sell or otherwise dispose of all or a portion of the Subject Property to another person or entity, which shall be designated as a "Landowner." Every Landowner, unless otherwise released, shall be subject to the obligations of the Developer under this Agreement related to such portion of the Subject Property. Section 6. Project is a Private Undertaking. While a portion of the Project creates improvements to public infrastructure, it is agreed among the Parties that the Project is a private development and that the City has no interest therein except as authorized in the exercise of its governmental functions. This Agreement shall not be interpreted or construed to create an association,joint venture, agency relationship, or partnership among the Parties or to impose any partnership obligation or partnership liability upon any Party.No Party shall have any right,power or authority to enter into any agreement or undertaking for, or act on behalf of, or to act as or be an agent or representative of, or to otherwise bind, any other Party. Section 7. Term ofAgreement. This Agreement shall commence upon the effective date of the Adopting Resolution approving this Agreement and shall continue in force until all of the obligations of the Developer hereunder have been satisfactorily performed and fulfilled, unless extended or terminated as provided herein. Section 8. Vested Rights of Developer. During the term of this Agreement, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the terms hereof, in developing the Subject Property consistent with the Project and additional improvements described herein, Developer is assured, and the City agrees, that the development rights specified in the attached exhibit C, obligations, terms and conditions specified in this Agreement, are fully vested in the Developer and may not be changed or modified by the City, except as may be expressly permitted by, and in accordance with, the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including the Exhibits hereto, or as expressly consented thereto by the Developer. Section 9. Permitted Uses and Development Standards. The permitted uses,the density and intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, provisions for reservation and dedication of land or payment of fees in lieu of dedicationfor public purposes, the construction, installation and extension of public improvements,development guidelines and standards for development of the Subject Property shall be those set forth in this Agreement, the permits and approvals identified herein, and all exhibits incorporated herein. 4 April 5, 2022 F - 9 Section 10. Minor Modifications. Minor modifications from the approved permits or the exhibits attached hereto may be approved in accordance with the provisions of the City's code and shall not require an amendment to this Agreement. Section 11. Further Discretionary Actions. Developer acknowledges that the Existing Land Use Regulations contemplate the exercise of further discretionary powers by the City. These powers include, but are not limited to, review of additional permit applications under SEPA. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the authority or the obligation of the City to hold legally required public hearings, or to limit the discretion of the City and any of its officers or officials in complying with or applyingExi sting Land Use Regulations. Section 12. Public Facilities. The additional improvements to public infrastructure facilities, as described in this Section 12, are an essential element of this Agreement. The improvements shall consist of improvements to the 14th Street Right-of-Way. The failure of the Developer to make the improvements as provided in this Section shall constitute a substantial breach of this entire Agreement. a) The Developer shall make, or shall cause to be made, improvements to the unfinished portions of the 14th Street Right-of-Way in accordance with specifications provided by the City b) The parties recognize and agree that the improvements described in Sections 3 and 12 are intended to benefit both the Project and the general public in the neighborhood of the Project. The improvements would not have been accomplished but for the Developer's agreement to complete the improvements in conjunction with work on the Project in exchange for partial reimbursement for the improvements from NICE funds. c) The Parties agree that at a minimum the work to be performed to bring the 14" Street Right-of-Way into conformance with City standards is as follows: Item City Developer Funded Funded Additional Amount Improvement Amount Engineering $1,500 Waterline $29,325 South shoulder rebuild $1,800 Swale on south side $1,200 North side curb & utter Labor yes Concrete yes North side Sidewalk Labor yes Concrete yes Driveway es ADA Crossing es 5 April 5, 2022 F - 10 Item City Developer Funded Funded Additional Amount Improvement Amount New catch basin add connection to yes existing storm drain Asphalt—north side and Milwaukee yes Right of way Asphalt—south side of frontage plus $14,250 portion to east New south side sidewalk $12,000 Subtotal yes $64,875 Sales Tax yes $5,577 Total Not to exceed $70,452 $43,969 d) The Parties agree that Developer and any subcontractor hired to perform the proposed improvements will pay prevailing wages to the persons performing the work in accordance with Exhibit E. e) The Parties agree that the City will contribute to the costs of the public infrastructure improvements as described above, using funds from the NICE program. The contributions shall be made in the form of reimbursements, in an amount not to exceed $43,969, for completed work. Reimbursement will be made within 45 days of City Council approval for the Phase 1 and 2 final ordinance and invoices provided to the City. The reimbursements shall be made only on the basis of invoices and other appropriate records supporting any claim for reimbursement of costs for the work satisfactorily completed following inspections of the improvements and approval of the work by the City. The City shall have the right to audit and approve each claim for reimbursement before payment. Any amounts expended by the Developer in excess of the $43,969 for the work described above will be borne by the Developer, Section 13. Existing Land Use Fees. a) Land use fees adopted by the City by ordinance as of the Effective Date of this Agreement may be increased by the City from time to time, and applicable to permits and approvals for the Subject Property, as long as such fees apply to similar applications and projects in the City. b) All fees shall be paid as set forth in the approved permit or approval, oras addressed in the Port Angeles Municipal Code. Section 14. Phasing of Development. a) The Parties acknowledge that the most efficient and economic development of the Subject Property depends upon numerous factors, such as market orientation and demand, interest rates, competition and similar factors,and that generally it will be most economically 6 April 5, 2022 F - 11 beneficial to the ultimate purchasers of the Subject Property to have the rate of development determined by the Developer. However, the Parties also acknowledge that because the Development will be phased, certain amenities associated with the Project must be available to all phases of the Project, in order to address health, safety and welfare of the residents. Therefore, the Parties agree that the improvements associated with the Project shall be constructed according to the following schedule: 1. Phase I (Northeast Property and Street Access). The Developer will install initial interior roadway improvements, an on-street parking area in the north part of the development, partial on-street parking in the northwest portion of the development, and sidewalk facilities on the exterior side of the street; develop Lots 1 through 5 into single- family residences and Lots 11 and 12 as duplex townhomes; provide initial connections to public utilities and development of a stormwater retention pond within a 15,035 square foot open space tract; develop a 3,457 square foot open space tract and connection to the Olympic Discovery Trail; and complete improvements to West 14th Street. 2. Phase II(East Property). The Developer will install the southeastern portion of the interior roadway and the eastern entrance to the alley, an on-street parking area in the eastern portion of the property, and sidewalk facilities on the exterior of the interior roadway; develop Lots 6 through 9 and Lot 31 with single-family residences;and develop a 5,430 square foot open space tract and internal walking path. 3. Phase III (Northwest Property). The Developer will construct the northwestern portion of the interior roadway, complete the northwestern on-street parking area, complete the internal alley, and complete sidewalk facilities on the exterior of the interior roadway; develop Lots 13 through 18 with townhome duplexes and Lot 30 with a single-family residence; and develop two additional open space tracts (4,420 square feet and 2,188 square feet) and a western connection to the Olympic Discovery Trail. 4. Phase IV (Southeast Property). The Developer will install the southeastern portion of the interior roadway, complete installation of on-street parking for thisarea, provide a temporary emergency vehicle turnaround area, and sidewalk facilities on the exterior of the street; and develop Lots 10, 24 and 25, and 28 and 29 with single-family residences and develop Lot 32 with a 6-unit cottage development. Lot 32 may be further subdivided as Lots 32 to 37 with development of the 6-unit cottage development at this time. The number of residential units, however, will not change. 5. Phase V (Southwest Property). The Developer will complete the interior roadway and sidewalk facilities; develop Lots 19 through 23 and 26 and 27 with single- family residences; and develop a southwestern stormwater pond within a 16,337 square foot open space tract. a) The Developer must submit and be approved for a Final Infill Overlay Zone and Final Subdivision for Phases I and II prior to November 22, 2022, which includes a one- year extension for Phase II. Until this condition has been satisfied the City is under no obligation to reimburse the Developer for moneys expended for the required improvements at the Project site. 7 April 5, 2022 F - 12 b) At the expiration of the preliminary Infill Overlay Zone and preliminary plat approval, which for Phase III is November 22, 2023 and for Phase IV is November 22, 2024, the Developer or Landowner shall submit an Infill Overlay Zone extension request per Port Angeles Municipal Code 17.45.140 for one or more years extension, as the Director deems appropriate. If the extension request is granted,the extension would apply towards the Infill Overlay Zone and preliminary plat approval. Section 15. Affordable Housing. a) Pursuant to Port Angeles Municipal Code 17.45.050.13 the Developer shall devote at least 20 percent of residential units to attainable housing. b) Pursuant to Port Angeles Municipal Code 17.45.050.0 the Developer shall provide for a mechanism to ensure that attainable housing remains attainable in perpetuity. Such mechanism shall be approved by the Director of Community and Economic Development and be stipulated on the final plat. Section 16. Additional Requirements. a) Pursuant to Port Angeles Municipal Code 17.45.050.E the Developer shall provide for continuous and perpetual maintenance of common open space, common recreation facilities,private roads, utilities,parking areas, and other similar development. b) Pursuant to Port Angeles Municipal Code 17.45.050.F the Developer shall ensure that proposed structures blend into the residential character of the surrounding neighborhood. Section 17. Default. a) Subject to extensions of time by mutual consent in writing, failure or delay byeither party or Landowner not released from this Agreement, to perform any term or provision of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event of alleged default or breach of any terms or conditions of this Agreement, the party alleging such default or breach shall give the other party or Landowner not less than thirty (30)days' notice in writing, specifying the nature of the alleged default and the manner in which said defaultmay be cured. During this thirty(30) day period,the party or Landowner charged shall not be considered in default for purposes of termination or institution of legal proceedings. b) After notice and expiration of the thirty (30) day period, if such default has notbeen cured or is not being diligently cured in the manner set forth in the notice,the other party or Landowner to this Agreement may, at its option, institute legal proceedings pursuant to this Agreement. In addition, the City may decide to file an action to enforce the City's Codes, and to obtain penalties and costs as provided in the Port Angeles Municipal Code for violations of this Development Agreement and the Code. Section 18. Annual Review. The City shall, at least every twelve (12) months during the term of this Agreement, review the extent of good faith substantial complianceby Developer and Landowner with this Agreement. The City may charge fees as necessary to cover the costs of 8 April 5, 2022 F - 13 conducting the annual review. Section 19. Termination. This Agreement shall expire and/or terminate as provided below: a) This Agreement shall expire and be of no further force and effect if the development contemplated in this Agreement and all of the permits and/or approvals issued by the City for such development are not substantially underway prior to expiration of such permits and/or approvals. Nothing in this Agreement shall extend theexpiration date of any permit or approval issued by the City for any development. b) This Agreement shall expire and be of no further force and effect if the Developer does not construct the Project as contemplated by the permits and approvalsidentified in this Agreement and submits applications for development of the Propertythat are inconsistent with such permits and approvals. c) This Agreement shall terminate upon the expiration of the term identified in Section 7 or when the Subject Property has been fully developed, which ever first occurs,and all of the Developer's obligations in connection therewith are satisfied as determinedby the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, the City shall record a notice of such termination in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney that the Agreement has been terminated. This Agreement shall automatically terminate and be of no further force andeffect as to any single-family residence, any other residential dwelling unit or any non-residential building and the lot or parcel upon which such residence or building is located, when it has been approved by the City for occupancy. Section 20. Effect upon Termination on Developer Obligations. Termination of this Agreement as to the Developer of the Subject Property or any portion thereof shallnot affect any of the Developer's obligations to comply with the City Comprehensive Plan and the terms and conditions or any applicable zoning code(s) or subdivision map orother land use entitlements approved with respect to the Subject Property, any other conditions of any other development specified in the Agreement to continue after the termination of this Agreement or obligations to pay assessments, liens, fees or taxes. Section 21. Effects upon Termination on City. Upon any termination of thisAgreement as to the Developer of the Subject Property, or any portion thereof,the entitlements, conditions of development, limitations on fees and all other terms and conditions of this Agreement shall no longer be vested hereby with respect to the property affected by such termination (provided that vesting of such entitlements,conditions or fees may then be established for such property pursuant to the existing planning and zoning laws). Section 22. Assignment and Assumption. The Developer shall have the right to sell, assign or transfer this Agreement with all their rights,title and interests therein toany person, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Agreement. Developer shall provide the City with written notice of any intent to sell, assign, ortransfer all or a portion of the Subject Property, at least 30 days in advance of such action. Section 23. Covenants Running with the Land. This Agreement shall be recorded in the 9 April 5, 2022 F - 14 records of Clallam County. The conditions and covenants set forth in this Agreement and incorporated herein by the Exhibits shall run with the land, and the benefits and burdens shall bind and inure to the benefit the parties and their successors. The Developer, Landowner and every purchaser, assignee or transferee of an interest in the Subject Property, or any portion thereof, shall be obligated and bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and shall be the beneficiary thereof and a party thereto, but only with respect to the Subject Property, or such portion thereof, sold, assigned or transferred to it. Any such purchaser, assignee or transferee shall observe and fully perform all of the duties and obligations of a Developer contained in this Agreement, as such duties and obligations pertain to the portion of the Subject Property sold, assigned ortransferred to it. Section 24. Amendment to Agreement; Effect of Agreement on Future Actions. This Agreement may be amended by mutual consent of all of the Parties, provided that any such amendment shall follow the process established by law for the adoption of a development agreement (see, RCW 36.70B.200). However, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the City Council from making any amendment to its Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, Official Zoning Map or development regulations affecting the Subject Property during the next five years, as the City Council may deem necessary to the extent required by a serious threat to public health and safety. Nothing in this Development Agreement shall prevent the City Council from making any amendments of any type to the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, Official Zoning Map or development regulations relating to the Subject Property five years from the anniversary date of the Effective Date of this Agreement. Section 25. Releases. Developer, and any subsequent Landowner, may free itself from further obligations relating to the sold, assigned, or transferred property, provided that the buyer, assignee or transferee expressly assumes the obligations underthis Agreement as provided herein. Section 26. Notices. Notices, demands, correspondence to the City and Developer shall be sufficiently given if dispatched by pre-paid first-class mail to the addresses of the Parties as designated in Section 5. Notice to the City shall be to the attention of both the City Manager and the City Attorney. Notices to subsequent Landowners shall be required to be given by the City only for those Landowners who have given the City written notice of their address for such notice. The Parties hereto may, from time to time, advise the other of new addresses for such notices, demands orcorrespondence. Section 27. Reimbursement for Agreement Expenses of the City. Developer agrees to reimburse the City for actual expenses incurred over and above fees paid by Developer as an applicant incurred by City directly relating to this Agreement,including recording fees,publishing fess and reasonable staff and consultant costs not otherwise included within application fees. This development agreement shall not take effect until the fees provided for in this section, as well as any processing fees owed to the City for the_Project are paid to the City. Upon payment of all expenses, the Developer may request written acknowledgement of all fees. Such payment of all fees shall be paid, at the latest, within thirty (30) days from the City's presentation of a written statement of charges to the Developer. Section 28. Applicable Law and Attorneys'Fees. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.If litigation is initiated to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable 10 April 5, 2022 F - 15 attorneys' fees and costs from the non-prevailing party.Venue for any action shall lie in Clallam County Superior Court or the U.S. District Court for Western Washington. Section 29. Third Party Legal Challenge. In the event any legal action or special proceeding is commenced by any person or entity other than a party or a Landowner to challenge this Agreement or any provision herein, the City may elect to tender the defense of such lawsuit or individual claims in the lawsuit to Developer and/orLandowner(s). In such event, Developer and/or such Landowners shall hold the City harmless from and defend the City from all costs and expenses incurred in the defense of such lawsuit or individual claims in the lawsuit, including but not limited to, attorneys' fees and expenses of litigation, and damages awarded to the prevailing party or parties insuch litigation. The Developer and/or Landowner shall not settle any lawsuit without theconsent of the City. The City shall act in good faith and shall not unreasonably withhold consent to settle. Section 30. Specific Performance. The Parties specifically agree that damages are not an adequate remedy for breach of this Agreement, and that the Parties are entitledto compel specific performance of all material terms of this Development Agreement by any party in default hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties hereto have caused this DevelopmentAgreement to be executed as of the dates set forth below: DEVELOPER: CITY OF PORT ANGELES By Dennis Yakovich, Manager Rustic Elements LLC By Kate Dexter, Mayor By Steve Wirth, Manager Double W Group LLC ATTEST: By Kari Martinez-Bailey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By William E. Bloor, City Attorney 11 April 5, 2022 F - 16 Exhibit A Legal description of the property: SUB LOT 83 SELY RA/VAND PTN VAC RD ABTG SURVEY V19 P24 UNDIVIDED 50% INT EA April 5, 2022 F - 17 Exhibit B NAsL-a P44ft-a w{ast-4 PHA&-s rot4L6 WniF'R 1I ;I ra�CT VIAL AR 95•°—S ",—R —M iImF 1];—� —,—. K.& M. W3 438 A.I. 4.151 15a62 s,p \\�`` \ OFM 6-AM laps+ A. 6A. --.- ran eftl 1 T 11 III \ �ASB'ENf ._.. .... .... g000 e151 naM E,1 II I roans I III L.—` f/ ♦® '� \\ w 10.936 4,S1 K2 4k' 30 5114 •W L RMAE8 1I� JJ_4'M1 G / j�• \ &o6uRK s.l mn ssl uo lace 41. 413 PAPoQIY+ 1F00 aau — \ MILWAUKEE TRAILS CISCOYEMY LOOP r__—_� 1 4mo.v � 1 r____,, ---- IF i I � __ 1 �----1 1 r---11r--'11 7---117---1 --r-- ,Ir -11r--- I F I I ' I 111 I I III 111 III I I I11 I11 I11 III I I —'—'— ' i ( III J Ijl I;I ;I f; I jl I;I I;I I;I I � I sroxv warca aow � L__—J L—__J L___J LJ L___J L___J --L--------�---- --- ---_ ;o.—�---- ---1----L---1----L--� Figure 1:Preliminary Plat showing development phases. April 5, 2022 F - 18 r"t CON$VUCTASPHALT WALK TO EDGE OF EX13TING Tr- NOTE IT x.;�` VRB PWNER DNLy PESPDNSIIAE TO CONSNCi RDADWAY 9 RAMP PER 3 STANDARD ALONGTHE FRONTAGE OFTIE PURdECT PROPERTY. PLAN FAG I2N ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS EEYOND THE PROPERTY "3, _ `__CDRNERS ITTXE RE$fYk151 BYLTY OF OTHERS. i'.. CURBRAi P-- \\�\ _ •y 6'WIDECONCRETESIDEWALK ———- CONSTRUCT PARALLEL CURD - —�— - SIDEWALK(SOUTH , \\ \ 5 ` - -RAMPS PER MOOT STANDARD -------- SIDE) `- [ \�. " _ PLeN FaG.t2m CURB RAMP OVEAPPROA.280 L,F Or 1A,STREET CURQU ERAND SOEWALN PER DETAIL..15 -GATE., Nid=—' CONSTRUCT DAMP WGWT \ \ WIOED. 5 '� W5DOT STANDARG PLAN F-0G.ifiA] f 1- \ CGSTING CTDRIVE5PERIDETAIL DETAIL _ \Ic EXISTING DRIVEWAYS PER DETAIL _�3 T,,,U1 NSTRUCISMOOTH - _y_ \ DDRNEwnr Ralvsmn\ _ `, REMDVf EXI5nNG ------------- rvs a E.- E L. �\ �a cuaaaAMa ur>P urr- PC DISCO Ek PROPC$ED DPEN En JL: L '? 'I 1'DI FFP T[1 DACE A.x.E PO RPHVID.._ c EDL_.'I w$TALLbra,O Ck1RB RAMS/: �� P, r _ _� ✓ ss�� / uns LROAING-DI Nv T TAPER LENGTH PRaroeEO Lori TaaeR w,rEu to S,61G SF.3 J SIDEWALK(SO TH� \' SIDE).prepu0or \ J 1 ; / v 'A ure devel menu �� 1r � mtpoe 4g c�i� NOTE: T \ / PROPOSEDLOT2 \1 2 Orrs TE PARI ST / ON EACH LOTH 1111-U- 4\ I5 rJ Er 1 ( Figure 2 Map identifying additional improvements funded by Developer in red. April 5, 2022 F - 19 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF PORT ANGELES In the Matter of the Application of ) Nos. 19-53 & 19-54 Dennis Yakovich ) For Approval of an Infill Overlay Zone ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, And Subdivision ) AND DECISION SUMMARY OF DECISION The request for approval to create a 32 to 37 lot subdivision in five phases, as an Infill Overlay Zone development, on approximately 7.66 acres at the southeast intersection of Milwaukee Boulevard and West 14th Street, is APPROVED. Conditions are necessary to mitigate specific impacts from the proposal. SUMMARY OF RECORD Hearing: The Hearing Examiner held an open record hearing on the request on November 7, 2019. Testimony: The following individuals presented testimony under oath at the open record hearing: Benjamin Braudrick, City Assistant Planner Allyson Brekke, Community and Economic Development Director Dennis Yakovich, Applicant Eric Walrath, City Engineering Supervisor Daniel Hall Eric Carlsen Exhibits: The following exhibits were admitted into the record: 1. Staff Report 2. Preliminary Subdivision Application, received July 3, 2019, with Infill Overlay Zone Narrative 3. Aerial Photographs, Maps, and Site Plan Drawings, undated 4. Milwaukee Trails— Summary of Site Data, undated 5. Fourteen (14) Elevation and Cottage Housing drawings, undated 6. Record of Survey, recorded October 11, 1990; Ordinance No. 3242,passed April 4, 2006 7. Preliminary Stormwater Report, Zenovic& Associates, Inc., revised June 18, 2019 8. SEPA Materials: a. Determination of Nonsignificance, dated September 27, 2019 b. Determination of Nonsignificance, dated April 26, 2006 Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page I of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 20 C. Environmental Checklist, dated March 23, 2006, with staff notes 9. Letter from Allyson Brekke to Dennis Yakovich, dated October 16, 2018; with Mailing List and Meeting Sign-In Sheet, dated January 18, 2018 10. Email from N. Eric Carlsen to Benjamin Braudrick, dated August 15, 2019, email string 11. Notice Materials: a. Notice—Development Application&Public Hearing, undated b. Affidavit of Noticing, dated November 1, 2019 C. Affidavit of Publication, Peninsula Daily News, dated July 31, 2019, with classified proof d. Notice of Rescheduled Public Hearing, undated 12. Staff PowerPoint Presentation, dated November 7, 2019 The Hearing Examiner enters the following findings and conclusions based upon the testimony and exhibits admitted at the open record hearing: FINDINGS Application and Public Notice 1. Dennis Yakovich (Applicant) requests approval to create a 32 to 37 lot subdivision in five phases, on approximately 7.66 acres, as an Infill Overlay Zone development. The proposal would involve development of 37 residential units: the range in lots reflects the fact that the Applicant would provide a six-unit cottage development as part of Phase IV of development but has not yet determined if these six residences would be located on one legal lot or on six individual lots. The site abuts Milwaukee Boulevard, which is improved solely with the regional, non-motorized Olympic Discovery Trail, and was previously cleared as part of a proposal that was never developed. Access to the site would be from 14th Street. Overall site improvements for the current proposal would include grading, installation of utilities and stormwater facilities, dedication of open space, and street improvements. The preliminary subdivision would involve an Infill Overlay Zone (IOZ) development, under Chapter 17.45 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC), as discussed in greater detail below. Accordingly, the proposal would involve greater density than with traditional development, as well as modified street standards, integration of open space, and use of multiple housing concepts to achieve infll development, maximum density, attainable housing, and functional innovation in development. The property is located at the southeast intersection of Milwaukee Boulevard and West 14th Street.' Exhibit 1, Staff Report,pages I through 3;Exhibit 2; Exhibit 3;Exhibit 5;Exhibit 12. 2. Phased development of the proposal is planned as follows: • Phase I (Northeast Property and Street Access). The Applicant would install initial interior roadway improvements, an on-street parking area in the north part ' The subject property is identified as County Tax Parcel No. 063000108300. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,page 1. A legal description of the property is included with the application materials. Exhibit 2. Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 2 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 21 of the development, partial on-street parking in the northwest portion of the development, and sidewalk facilities on the exterior side of the street; develop Lots 1 through 5 into single-family residences and Lots 11 and 12 as duplex townhomes;provide initial connections to public utilities and development of a stormwater retention pond within a 15,035 square foot open space tract; develop a 3,457 square foot open space tract and connection to the Olympic Discover Trail; and complete improvements to West 14th Street. • Phase II (East Property). The Applicant would install the southeastern portion of the interior roadway and the eastern entrance to the alley, an on-street parking area in the eastern portion of the property, and sidewalk facilities on the exterior of the interior roadway; develop Lots 6 through 9 and Lot 31 with single-family residences; and develop a 5,430 square foot open space tract and internal walking path. • Phase III (Northwest Property). The Applicant would construct the northwestern portion of the interior roadway, complete the northwestern on-street parking area, complete the internal alley, and complete sidewalk facilities on the exterior of the interior roadway; develop Lots 13 through 18 with townhome duplexes and Lot 30 with a single-family residence; and develop two additional open space tracts (4,420 square feet and 2,188 square feet) and a western connection to the Olympic Discovery Trail. • Phase IV (Southeast Property). The Applicant would install the southeastern portion of the interior roadway, complete installation of on-street parking for this area, provide a temporary emergency vehicle turnaround area, and sidewalk facilities on the exterior of the street; and develop Lots 10, 24 and 25, and 28 and 29 with single-family residences and develop Lot 32 with a 6-unit cottage development. Lot 32 may be further subdivided as Lots 32 to 37 with development of the 6-unit cottage development at this time. The number of residential units, however, would not change. • Phase V (Southwest Property). The Applicant would complete the interior roadway and sidewalk facilities; develop Lots 19 through 23 and 26 and 27 with single-family residences; and develop a southwestern stormwater pond within a 16,337 square foot open space tract. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,pages 2 and 3;Exhibit 2;Exhibit 3;Exhibit 4;Exhibit 12. 3. The City of Port Angeles (City) determined the application was complete on July 26, 2019. That same day, the City mailed or emailed notice of the application and associated open record hearing to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property and to reviewing government departments and agencies. On July 31, 2019, the City published notice in the Peninsula Daily News. It was later determined, twice, that the proposed open record hearing would need to be rescheduled. Accordingly, the City provided notice of the rescheduled hearing, as required by the municipal code, including posting notice on the City's website and at the hearing room on the originally scheduled hearing dates. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,page 4;Exhibit 11. Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 3 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 22 4. The City received one written comment in response to its notice materials. Area resident Eric Carlsen wrote the City with concern over the order of phased development proposed and suggested that all required frontage improvements to West 14th Street be completed as part of the first phase of development. Exhibit 10. State Environmental Policy Act 5. The City acted as lead agency and analyzed the environmental impacts of the proposal as required by the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C Revised Code of Washington (RCW). The City used the Optional Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)process allowed by Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-355 and provided notice with the notice of application. The notice materials stated that the City expected to issue a DNS for the proposal and provided a comment deadline of August 21, 2019. The City received no comments on the proposal. Following the comment period, the City reviewed the Applicant's environmental checklist and other information on file and determined that the proposal would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment.2 Accordingly, the City issued a DNS for the proposal on September 27, 2019, with an appeal deadline of October 11, 2019. The DNS was not appealed. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,page 27;Exhibit 8;Exhibit IL Comprehensive Plan and Zoning 6. The City Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property between the Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential designations. The Low Density Residential designation allows an overall residential density of up to 7 dwelling units per acre (du/acre), while the Medium Density Residential designation allows an overall residential density of up to 13 du/acre. The proposal would involve approximately 8.2 du/acre, satisfying this requirement. Property designated Low Density Residential is generally intended for the development of single-family homes while property designated Medium Density Residential is intended for the development of multiple residential unit projects including duplexes, townhouses, and condominiums. City Comprehensive Plan, Section 3-2. The proposal would involve development of single-family residences, duplex townhomes, and cottage housing, satisfying these requirements. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, page 3;Exhibit 2. 7. City staff identified several goals and policies3 from the Comprehensive Plan relevant to the proposal, including: 2 The City previously approved a subdivision proposal for the site in 2006 and issued a DNS(No. 1152B) at that time. The proposal was never constructed. At the City's suggestion,the Applicant adopted and updated the former SEPA materials,including annotating the previously used SEPA checklist from 2006, during SEPA review for the current proposal. Exhibit 8;Exhibit 9. s City staff identified the following specific Comprehensive Plan sections as relevant to the proposal: Growth Management Goal G-2A and Policies P-2A.01 and P-2A.14;Land Use Element Goals G-3A,G- 3B,G-3C,and G-3K,and Policies P-3A.01,P-3B.01,P-3B.02,P-3B.04,P-3B.05,P-3C.03,P-3K.02 and P- 3K.03;Transportation Element Goal G-4B and Policies P-4B.07 and P-4B.09;Utilities and Public Services Element Goal G-5D and Policies P-5D.02 and P-5D.07;Housing Element Goal G-6A and Policies P- 6A.04,P-6A.06,and P-6A.13;Conservation Element Goal G-7A and Policies P-7A.01,P-7A.03,and P- Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 4 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 23 • Managing growth in a responsible manner that is beneficial to the community as a whole, is sensitive to the rights and needs of individuals, and is consistent with the Growth Management Act(Chapter 36.70A RCW). • Encouraging development in urban areas and reducing sprawl and the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development. • Encouraging the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population and promoting a variety of residential densities and housing types and sizes, and encouraging the preservation and expansion of existing housing stock. • Guiding land development in a manner that balances providing certainty about future land use with allowing the flexibility necessary to adapt to future challenges and opportunities. • Ensuring residential land use and development is compatible with the environment, with existing uses and residents, and with desired urban design. • Creating and maintaining a fulfilling and enjoyable community of viable districts and neighborhoods with a variety of residential types attractive to people of all ages, characteristics, and interests. • Encouraging the development of parks and recreational opportunities for all residents of the City and increasing access to natural areas in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts and achieves the desired urban design for the City. • Improving circulation patters across and within the community and achieving the desired urban design of the city. • Providing utility service in an efficient and cost-effective manner. • Improving the variety, quality, availability, and attainability of housing opportunities in the city. • Creating and maintaining a community with a high quality of life where land is used in a manner that is compatible with the area's unique physical features; its natural, historical, archaeological, and cultural amenities; and the overall environment. • Providing and maintaining safe and financially feasible urban services and capital facilities at or above stated levels of service to all city residents and the general public. • Reducing the amount of impervious surface created by new developments and thereby reducing stormwater management costs and environmental impacts to the city and its natural resources. • Acquiring, developing, renovating, and maintaining a sustainable system of parks, recreational facilities, and open spaces to ensure that the contributions of natural 7A.04;Capital Facilities Element Goals G-8A,G-8B,and G-8D,and Policies P-8A.02,P-8A.04,P-8A.07, P-8A.12,P-8A.17,P-8B.02,P-8B.03,P-8B.04,P-8B.05,P-8B.06,and P-8D.0-1;and Parks and Recreation Element Goals G-10A,G-1 OB,and G-1 OC,and Policies P-10A.02,P-10A.03,P-10A.07,P-1 OB.03,P- IOB.06,P-IOC.01,and P-IOC.02. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,pages 4 through 11. Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 5 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 24 resources and recreation to human well-being are maintained and recognized as a value. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,pages 4 through 12. 8. The site is located within the City's Residential Medium Density (RMD) zoning district. The purpose of the RMD zone is to create a medium density residential zone that allows a mix of single-family, two-family/duplexes, and multi-family dwellings at a density greater than single-family neighborhoods but less than the higher densities of the Residential High Density (RHD) Zone. PAMC 17.14.010. The RMD zone provides for variety in the urban land use pattern for the City's lower density multi-family residential neighborhoods (at twice the density of the City's basic single-family residential neighborhoods)with direct access on an arterial street, usually located in outlying areas with large tracts of vacant buildable land, and serving as a transitional use between low density residential uses and commercial or industrial uses. PAMC 17.14.010. Single- family residences, townhouse duplexes, and cottage housing are all permitted in the RMD zone. PAMC 17.14.020. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,page 3. 9. Property to the south and east is also zoned RMD and is generally developed (or underdeveloped) with existing single-family residences. Property to the north and west is zoned Single-Family Residential (RS-9 or RS-11) and is undeveloped or developed with single-family residences. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,page 2. Existing Site and IOZ Requirements 10. The site encompasses approximately 7.66 acres and is currently undeveloped. As noted above, the site was previously cleared pursuant to an approved proposal that never was developed. The site slopes gently (between grades of three to five percent) downhill from the southwest toward West 14th Street. The proposal would include development of 37 residential units, including a variety of housing types, situated along an internal "loop" road off of West 14th Street. Several open space tracts designated for active and passive recreational use would be provided throughout the development as well as two connections to the Olympic Discovery Trail(Milwaukee Boulevard). Exhibit 1, Staff Report,pages 2 through 4;Exhibit 2;Exhibit 12. 11. PAMC 17.14.050 provides area and dimensional requirements specific to the RMD zone. Specifically, development in the RMD zone typically requires: minimum lot areas of 3,500 square feet; minimum lot width/frontage of 40 feet; maximum net density of 14 dwelling units per acre; maximum building height of 35 feet; maximum lot coverage of 50 percent; maximum site coverage of 75 percent; and minimum front and rear setbacks of 15 feet. PAMC 17.14.050. Here, however, the Applicant has requested several modifications to these standards through Infill Overlay Zone (IOZ) development. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,page 25. 12. The municipal code provides for IOZ development to provide alternative zoning regulations that permit and encourage design flexibility through the implementation of Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 6 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 25 smart growth practices to promote infill, maximum density, attainable housing, and functional innovation in developments that are both transit and pedestrian oriented and which blend into the character of the existing neighborhoods. PAMC 17.45.010. It is intended that an IOZ will result in a residential environment of higher quality than traditional lot-by-lot development by use of a design process that includes within the site design all the components of an urban residential environment, such as walkability, access to transit, and a variety of building types, in a manner consonant with the public health, safety and welfare and results in a specifically approved site design. PAMC 17.45.010. More specifically, IOZs are aimed to implement smart growth practices on infill or redevelopment sites that are surrounded by existing development and infrastructure. It is also intended that an IOZ may combine a number of land use decisions such as conditional use permits, rezones, and subdivisions into a single project review process to encourage timely public hearings and decisions and to provide for attainable higher densities than is required or may be permitted between single-family and multi- family zones. The consolidation of permit reviews does not exempt applicant(s) from meeting the regulations and submitting the fees and applications normally required for the underlying permit processes. Few nonresidential uses are allowed in this overlay zone and then only conditionally, because of land use impacts associated with nonresidential uses. Incorporation of conditionally permitted commercial neighborhood uses and mixed use developments can be achieved through the IOZ review. This overlay zone provides for the creation of infill developments and smaller self-contained residential neighborhoods that complement the existing neighborhood without following a standard system of public streets and lot design and with opportunities for residential and commercial neighborhood developments not usually permitted in residential zones. PAMC 17.45.010. 13. IOZs are allowed in the RMD zone so long as the proposed lot contains a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet, is composed of one parcel or contiguous parcels, and no part of the proposed IOZ is part of a subdivision receiving final plat approval within the preceding five years. PAMC 17.45.020. The proposal would satisfy each of these requirements. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,pages 22 through 26. 14. Under PAMC 17.45.040, the approval of an IOZ may include modifications to the requirements and standards of the underlying land use regulations of the zone in which the project is located subject to certain limitations: no approval shall include a modification, variance, or waiver of the setback areas required by the underlying zone along the exterior property lines of the IOZ, of the environmental requirements as Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 7 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 26 included in Title 15 of the PANIC and of any building permit, clearing and grading permit and stormwater permit requirements. City staff reviewed the proposal and determined that the proposed IOZ would satisfy the requirements of PANIC 17.45.040. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,pages 20 through 26. 15. The Applicant has sought several permitted modifications to the requirements of the RMD zone. Specifically: • Modification of the street frontage requirements for Lot 21 in order to provide adequate access for the adjacent southwestern open space tract and stormwater detention facility. • Minor modification of other frontage requirements for several irregular lots in light of the irregular shape of the property. • Allowance of zero lot lines for lots involving townhouse duplex development. • The rear setback of lots on the southern side of the development would be measured from an existing 35-feet easement, which overlaps 5-feet into the property. This would effectively provide for a 30-foot setback from the south property line. The City has stated that it does not intend to develop the easement area with right-of-way, eliminating concerns about deviations from the exterior setback of the IOZ. • Modification of the interior roadway standard from a 34-foot paved width with curb, gutter, and sidewalk on each side, to a 24-foot paved street with curb, gutter, and sidewalk on each side. Alternatively, the internal roadway would be private and would provide a 24-foot paved street with curb, gutter, and sidewalk on one side. • Relief from the maximum block length requirement of 500 feet. Due to the irregular shape of the parcel, the length of the "eastern" block would be 560 feet. There is an intersection connecting the interior roadway at approximately 380 feet on-center and a proposed sidewalk crossing at approximately 210 feet on-center alleviating concerns over block length. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,pages 24 through 26. 16. PANIC 17.45.050 provides specific design and development standards specific to all IOZs. These include requirements related to: street and utility improvements; attainable housing; maintenance of common facilities including parking, landscaping, open space and recreational facilities, private roads, and utilities; ensuring proposed structures blend into the residential character of the surrounding neighborhood; obtaining plat approval; site design; and compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. City staff analyzed the proposal for consistency with the requirements of PANIC 17.45.050 and determined: • Reduction of the internal roadway from 34 to 24 feet would be allowed. For the internal roadway to be dedicated to the City, however, improvements including curb, gutter, and sidewalk on each side of the roadway would be necessary and adequate on-street and off-street parking must be provided and curve radii must be of adequate size to accommodate all emergency vehicle types. Without such Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 8 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 27 improvements, the roadway would be designated as a private street and must be maintained by the homeowners association. • At least 20 percent of residential units would be devoted to attainable housing and this would be stated on the face of the plat. • An open space area of 46,681 square feet would be managed through covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) and the neighborhood's homeowners association (HOA). • Elevations of several housing options were provided with the application materials that show that all of the housing types proposed would blend into the residential character of the surrounding neighborhood. • No further subdivision of the land within the IOZ would be permitted unless a formal amendment to the IOZ is approved. • Design flexibility has been utilized to provide a higher quality residential environment that meets the intent of the design review standards for IOZs. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,pages 20 through 26. Subdivision Requirements 17. As noted above, the proposed IOZ would involve subdivision of the property into between 32 and 37 lots, with 37 residential units including single-family residences, townhome duplexes, and six units of cottage housing. Chapter 16.08 PAMC provides general provisions that regulate the subdivision of land, consistent with the State Subdivision Act, Chapter 58.17 RCW. Specifically, the purpose of Chapter 16.08 PAMC is: to provide uniform regulations for the subdivision and resubdivision of land into five or more parcels, so as to promote the public health, safety and general welfare. It is further the purpose of this chapter to implement the requirements of the Growth Management Act of 1990 through the goals, policies, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan of the City, to comply with the requirements of the Zoning Code and Urban Services Ordinance of the City, to ensure orderly growth consistent with the desired urban design of the City, to promote effective and energy-efficient use of land, to prevent over-crowding of land, to provide for adequate light and air, to promote safe and convenient travel and lessen congestion on streets and highways, to provide for proper ingress and egress, to ensure adequate provision for open spaces, drainage ways, transit stops,potable water supplies, sanitary wastes,parks and recreation areas, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks and safe walking conditions on school routes, and other public requirements, to require uniform monumenting of land subdivisions and conveyancing by accurate legal description, and to prevent the creation of public nuisances. PAMC 16.08.01O.A. Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 9 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 28 General Subdivision Requirements 18. City staff analyzed the proposal for consistency with the general requirements for subdivision of land under PAMC 16.08.010.A and Chapter 58.17 RCW and determined: • The proposal would be consistent with the goals, policies, and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it would involve a 37-unit development that incorporates diverse housing, open space, and access to public utilities that are adequately sized for impacts to the larger system. • The proposal would be served indirectly by "O Street," a designated arterial street to the east. Direct access to the subdivision would occur from West 14th Street, and internal access would be provided through a"loop" internal road. Improvements to West 14th Street would assist in lessening neighborhood congestion, and the multimodal internal circulation proposed for the plat would meet requirements of RMD zone, as conditioned. • The street design would maintain the current street circulation pattern consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. Selected on-street parking areas and an improved alleyway would provide sufficient access and traffic flow within the development. The development would also provide two direct access points to the Olympic Discovery Trail. • The proposal would provide adequate on-site stormwater management. If designed and landscaped correctly, the proposed stormwater facilities on-site (a detention pond proposed in the southwest corner of the plat and a detention pond proposed in the northeast corner of the plat) would also serve as passive recreational areas. In addition, stormwater treatment on-site would go above and beyond traditional requirements to reduce development impacts on surrounding neighborhoods and community-wide capital facilities, as detailed in the preliminary stormwater report prepared by Zenovic& Associates, Inc., revised June 18, 2019. • The Applicant would construct curbs, gutters, and sidewalks along the full frontage of the development along West 14th Street. • The Applicant would plant street trees within the right-of-way, as required by PAMC 11.13.050. • There are no critical areas on-site. The Applicant would submit a Landscape Plans and Plant Schedule for all open spaces and right-of-way improvements as part of the final plat application submission. • The proposal's phasing provides coordinated development, adequate space for recreation, and for the general health, safety, and welfare of the future residents. • The Applicant would ensure that a safe walking route exists from the proposed development to designated school bus stops or designated school walking routes. • Existing water and sewer mains within the West 14th Street right-of-way are available to provide service to the development. All extended utilities would be located within the right-of-way of the internal road serving the plat, consistent with municipal requirements. • All streetlights would meet the City's USSG standards. Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 10 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 29 • Here, with only 37 residential units proposed, the City determined that no traffic impact analysis (TIA) would be required and that the proposal would not cause levels of service (LOS) on streets and intersections in the vicinity to fall below acceptable levels. • Area schools have adequate capacity to serve the development • The Applicant would ensure that one freestanding sign, no larger than 24 square feet in area, identifies the subdivision. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,pages 4 through 22. Specific Subdivision Requirements 19. In addition to the general subdivision requirements described above, PAMC 16.08.060 provides specific standards and policies applicable to all subdivisions in the city. These include requirements related to: the design and layout of streets and sidewalks; ensuring adequate open space is provided for recreation, schools, light and air; the distribution of population and traffic;the design of blocks, lots, and public spaces; installation of utilities, including street lighting; required street improvements; and allowed signage. PAMC 16.08.060.A through -.P. Project plans show that the proposal, as conditioned, would satisfy these specific requirements. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,pages 4 through 23; Exhibit 2;Exhibit 12. Testimony 20. City Assistant Planner Benjamin Braudrick testified generally about the proposal and how it would comply with the City's Comprehensive Plan, zoning ordinances, and critical areas ordinances. He explained the modifications to the zoning requirements that the Applicant requested through the IOZ process and detailed how the proposal would maximize density on the property through use of innovative housing types, including cottage housing and duplexes. Mr. Braudrick also explained the details of the overlapping easement that occurs at the southern boundary of the property. He explained that the easement relates to a vacated portion of the West 16th Street right-of-way (ROW). Because of the width of the ROW, proximity to the Olympic Discovery Trail, and development patterns in the area, the City does not intend on developing the ROW with a street in the future. Mr. Braudrick noted that, for IOZs in the RMD zone, a minimum density of 8.2 d/u acres is required under PAMC 17.45.060 and the proposal would satisfy this requirement. He also explained that the number of units within the development would be 37 —regardless of whether Lot 32 is further subdivided into 6 lots, therefore ensuring that density and attainable housing requirements are satisfied. Finally, Mr. Braudrick testified that City staff reviewed the preliminary stormwater plans for the proposal and determined they are satisfactory but that additional analysis would occur during development of each individual phase of the project. Testimony of Mr. Braudrick. 21. Community and Economic Development Director Allyson Brekke testified about the SEPA review process that occurred for the proposal. She explained that staff determined that the environmental considerations related to the subject property have not changed significantly since a previous proposal was approved in 2006 and, accordingly, suggested Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 11 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 30 that the Applicant adopt and amend the previously used SEPA materials from that project. Ms. Brekke clarified, however, that all reports and analysis of the current project (including the submitted stormwater report)were produced recently. Testimony of Ms. Brekke. 22. Applicant Dennis Yakovich testified generally about the application. He stressed that there is a demand in the area for additional, diverse housing in the region, and this proposal would provide for such diverse housing. Mr. Yakovich testified that phased development of the project is especially important because this would allow the Applicant to build high quality housing, approximately 3 to 5 homes per year, in phases. Mr. Yakovich explained how stormwater on-site would be managed and noted that, through use of infiltration, drainage swales, and low impact development (LID) techniques, all stormwater would be retained on-site or treated prior to being discharged into existing stormwater conveyance systems in the area(i.e., the drainage ditch along West 14th Street). Mr. Yakovich expressed a desire to continue working with the City to find a solution acceptable to both parties related to the requirements for curb, gutter, and sidewalk on both sides of the internal road serving the property. Testimony of Mr. Yakovich. 23. In response to Mr. Yakovich's testimony, City Engineering Supervisor Eric Walrath testified that having curb, gutter, and sidewalk on both sides of the internal street would not necessarily preclude the use of swales along the internal street. Ms. Brekke further explained that, as part of the IOZ process, Mr. Walrath has the authority to reduce the width of the internal street(as occurred here) but not the requirements related to curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. She explained that, until further details about stormwater are provided, it is unclear how bioswales would work with the internal streets. Ms. Brekke stated, however, that the City is willing to work with the Applicant to determine if a solution is possible whereby sidewalks and curbs are provided on both sides of the internal street with bioswales incorporated in such a way that the City would be comfortable having the internal street dedicated to it. Testimony of Mr. Walrath; Testimony of Ms. Brekke. 24. Area resident Daniel Hall testified that he did not receive notification of the proposal and hearing but believes he lives within 300 feet of the subject property. He did not express concerns about the proposal itself but noted concern about the adequacy of the notice that was provided. In response, Mr. Braudrick explained that the City uses tax records to determine the 300-foot mailing list and that these are not always updated. He stressed, however, that the project site itself was posted with notice. Ms. Brekke also explained that, when the City learns someone has not received notice, it strives to ensure future information about a proposal is provided and that any party may request that it be included on notifications specific to a particular proposal. Testimony of Mr. Hall; Testimony of Mr. Braudrick; Testimony of Ms. Brekke. Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 12 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 31 25. Eric Carlsen testified that he agrees with the City's determination that all improvements to West 14th Street should occur during Phase I of the project. He also expressed concern over potential impacts from stormwater in the vicinity. Testimony of Mr. Carlsen. 26. In response to Mr. Carlsen's comments, Mr. Yakovich stressed that the development would not exacerbate any stormwater issues in the area and that use of the two stormwater detention ponds would allow the Applicant to meter and treat stormwater prior to it being discharged such that it should reduce problems related to both flow and siltation. Mr. Yakovich also expressed a preference for completing the improvements to West 14th Street at a later phase of development but noted that he understands why the City (and Hearing Examiner) would insist such improvements occur during the first phase of development. Testimony of Mr. Yakovich. Staff Recommendation 27. Mr. Braudrick testified that City staff determined that, with conditions, the proposal would meet the requirements of the City code and would be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Yakovich testified that the Applicant would adhere to the recommended conditions of approval. Exhibit 1, Staff Report,pages 3 through 32; Testimony of Mr. Braudrick; Testimony of Mr. Yakovich. CONCLUSIONS Jurisdiction The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to hear and decide requests for preliminary plats and PRDs. Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC) 2.18.060; PAMC 17.45.120;Exhibit 1, Staff Report,page 4. Criteria for Review Infill Overlay Zone Development The Hearing Examiner's decision for approval, denial, or approval with modifications or conditions shall be in written form based upon compliance with section 17.19.050 and the following criteria: A. The proposed development will comply with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and further attainment of the objectives and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. B. The proposed development will, through the improved utilization of housing densities landscaping, and integrated circulation systems, create a residential environment of higher quality than that normally achieved by traditional development of a subdivision. C. The proposed development achieves smart growth goals and principles through infll, redevelopment, and establishment of a pedestrian and transit-friendly environment. D. The proposed development will be compatible with adjacent, existing and future developments. Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 13 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 32 E. All necessary municipal utilities, services and facilities, existing and proposed, are adequate to serve the proposed development. F. Internal streets serving the proposed development are adequate to serve anticipated traffic levels and the street system of the proposed development is functionally connected by an improved collector street to at least one improved arterial street. G. If the development is planned to occur in phases, each phase shall meet the requirements of a complete development. PAMC 17.45.120. Preliminary Plat PAMC 16.08.060 contains standards and policies for the approval of a preliminary plat, including: The [Hearing Examiner]4 shall ensure that appropriate provision is made for: (1) the harmonious development of neighborhoods by requiring coordination of streets within subdivisions with existing or planned streets, or with other elements of the Comprehensive Plan; (2) adequate open spaces for recreation, schools, light and air; (3) distribution of population and traffic which will create conditions favorable to public health, safety and convenience. The [Hearing Examiner] shall inquire into the public use, interest or need proposed to be served by the establishment of a subdivision. If the results of such an inquiry indicate that a subdivision will not serve the public use, interest or need, the [Hearing Examiner] may [deny] such subdivision. The [Hearing Examiner] shall ensure that a subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Urban Services Ordinance. Land which the [Hearing Examiner] has found to be unsuitable for subdivision due to flooding, bad drainage, steep slopes, rock formations or other feature likely to be harmful to the safety, welfare and general health of the future residents, and the [Hearing Examiner] considers inappropriate for subdivision, - shall not be subdivided unless adequate methods which are consistent with the City's Wetlands and Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protection Ordinances are formulated by the developer and approved by the Community and Economic Development Director. PAMC 16.08.060.B. d Recent code amendments have assigned this role to the Hearing Examiner,under PAMC 2.18.060.A.3. Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 14 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 33 RCW 58.17.110(2)requires that a proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless the Hearing Examiner finds that:5 (a) Appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops,potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and (b) the public use and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication. The criteria for review adopted by the City Council are designed to implement the requirement of Chapter 36.70B RCW to enact the Growth Management Act. In particular, RCW 36.70B.040 mandates that local jurisdictions review proposed development to ensure consistency with City development regulations, considering the type of land use, the level of development, infrastructure, and the characteristics of development. RCW 36.70B.040. Conclusions Based on Findings Infill Overlay Zone Development 1. With conditions,the Infill Overlay Zone Development(IOZ) would meet the requirements of Chapter 17.45 PAMC. The City provided reasonable notice of the application and opportunity to comment on the proposal. The City received one comment concerning phasing of the development and the concerns expressed in the comment have been addressed. The property is designated Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential under the City's Comprehensive Plan. Both single-family and multi-family (including cottage and townhome) residential development is encouraged under this designation. City staff identified several Comprehensive Plan policies related to the proposal, including encouraging development in areas where adequate public facilities and services exist; reducing sprawl and the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development; and encouraging the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population and promoting a variety of residential densities and housing types and sizes. The property is located within the City's Medium Density Residential(MRD) zoning district. The purpose of the RMD zone is to create a medium density residential zone that allows a mix of single-family, two-family/duplexes, and multi-family dwellings at a density greater than single-family neighborhoods but less than the higher densities of the Residential High Density (RHD) Zone. Here, the Applicant would provide for a variety of housing types on approximately 7.66 acres, at a density of approximately 8.2 du/acre, consistent with Comprehensive Plan and zoning requirements related to density. As noted above,PAMC 16.08.010.A incorporates the requirements that must be met under RCW 58.17.110(2). Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 15 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 34 The Applicant has proposed modifications to underlying zoning requirements that are allowed with an IOZ, including: modification of the street frontage requirements for Lot 21 in order to provide adequate access for the adjacent southwestern open space tract and stormwater detention facility; minor modification of other frontage requirements for several irregular lots in light of the irregular shape of the property; allowance of zero lot lines for lots involving townhouse duplex development; measuring the rear setback of lots on the southern side of the development from an existing 35-feet easement, which overlaps 5-feet into the property; modification of the interior roadway standard from a 34-foot paved width with curb, gutter, and sidewalk on each side, to a 24-foot paved width with curb, gutter, and sidewalk on each side or, alternatively, modification of the interior roadway to a 24-foot paved street with curb, gutter, and sidewalk on one side but the street would be maintained as a private street; and relief from the maximum block length requirement of 500 feet. City staff reviewed the proposal and determined that the requested modifications to the requirements of the RMD zoning district would result in a more fully designed residential development than traditional subdivision development, consistent with the intent of an IOZ under Chapter 17.45 PAMC. The Hearing Examiner concurs with the City's assessment. The proposed development would, through infill development, increased density, availability of attainable housing, and functional innovation, create a residential environment of higher quality than that normally achieved by traditional development of a subdivision. Surrounding property is generally undeveloped or"under developed" with single-family residences. The proposal would be compatible with adjacent, existing, and future development. Project plans show that all necessary municipal utilities, services, and facilities are adequate to serve the proposed development. The proposal would meet the urban service standards and guidelines (USSG) for streets in the RMD zoning district or the internal street would be maintained as a private road. At least 20 percent of residential units would be devoted to attainable housing and this would be stated on the face of the plat. An open space area of 46,681 square feet would be managed through covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs). The Applicant would create a homeowner's association (HOA) that would be responsible for continuous and perpetual maintenance of common open space, recreation facilities, utilities, parking areas, and other common features of the IOZ. No further subdivision of the IOZ would occur without a formal amendment, and the design of the IOZ would provide appropriate recreation facilities; and ensure that the design of all open space areas and building structures is compatible with and complementary to the environment in which they are located. In particular, the proposal would provide two separate access points to the Olympic Discovery Trail (Milwaukee Boulevard). Conditions are necessary to ensure that the proposal complies with all requirements of the municipal code and other local, state, and federal requirements. Findings 116, 19 27. Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 16 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 35 Preliminary Plat 2. With conditions,the preliminary subdivision would make appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes,parks and recreation, playgrounds, and schools and school grounds. The property is designated Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential under the City Comprehensive Plan, and single-family and multi-family residential development is encouraged under this designation. City staff identified several Comprehensive Plan policies related to the proposal, including increasing housing opportunities and ensuring that new development is consistent with citywide goals and policies. The property is located within the City's Medium Density Residential(MRD) zoning district and would be compatible with neighboring land uses because surrounding properties are also undeveloped or developed with residential development. The site contains no critical areas. The Applicant would provide for treatment of stormwater runoff, utilize City IOZ development provisions for innovative residential housing development, and provide for sidewalks within the proposed plat and sidewalks to connect to existing sidewalks in the vicinity of the plat. The proposed plat and IOZ would be developed at a density consistent with the property's MRD zoning designation and the IOZ standards. The requested dimensional and lot size modifications from the standard MRD zoning district requirements, available through IOZ provisions of the Port Angeles Municipal Code, would result in a residential environment of higher quality than traditional lot-by-lot development, including all the components of an urban residential environment, such as walkability, access to transit, and a variety of building types, in a manner consonant with the public health, safety and welfare. As proposed,the IOZ and preliminary plat would provide for significant open space within the development (46,681 square feet)that would be available for active and passive recreational use. The new subdivision would be accessed from a new internal road from West 14th Street, which would"loop" throughout the plat. Students would have a safe walking route to area schools and school bus stops. Water, sewer, and electrical service are available to serve the proposed subdivision. As noted above in Conclusion 1, conditions are necessary to ensure that the proposal meets all criteria required for plat approval. Findings 127. 3. With conditions,the proposed subdivision would be consistent with development regulations, considering land use type, development level, infrastructure, and development characteristics, such as development standards, as required by Chapter 58.17 RCW and Chapter 16.08 PAMC. The City provided reasonable notice of the application and the DNS that was issued under SEPA. No comments on the DNS were received, and the DNS was not appealed. The preliminary plat would provide residential development consistent with applicable development regulations. City staff determined that, with conditions, the proposal would be consistent with all applicable City, county, and state requirements, including the applicable Comprehensive Plan, municipal code, and development standards. The public interest would be served by the Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 17 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 36 platting of the subdivision. Conditions are necessary to ensure that the proposal meets all criteria required for plat approval. Findings 127. DECISION Based on the preceding findings and conclusions, the request to create a 32 to 37 lot subdivision in five phases, as an Infill Overlay Zone development, on approximately 7.66 acres at the southeast intersection of Milwaukee Boulevard and West 14th Street is APPROVED, with the following conditions:6 1. Addresses shall be assigned at time of final plat application submission and shown on the final plat. 2. All future residential structures built within the project site shall require installation of residential sprinkler systems and shall be added as a note on the final plat. 3. It is the responsibility of the developer, contractor, or their agent(s)to employ a Professional Engineer to certify the project was inspected, applicable tests performed, and materials were installed per the approved plans and specifications. An Engineer's Construction Inspection Certification, Appendix O, Chapter 1 of the City's Urban Services Standards and Guidelines (USSG), shall be completed and submitted to the City prior to final acceptance. 4. Final approval of the IOZ shall be in accordance with PAMC 17.45.140. The City shall have the authority to approve minor deviations to the submitted proposal, when appropriate, prior to final plat approval. 5. Landscape Plans and plant schedule for all open spaces, right of way and utility improvements shall be provided with the final plat application submission. 6. The management and maintenance of common ownership areas is the responsibility of the developer and must be included as a note on the final plat. 7. All common open space areas immediately adjacent to private property areas shall be fenced or marked in a manner that clearly denotes the private property from the common open space areas. 8. Twenty percent of the dwelling units constructed shall be attainable housing in accordance with PAMC 17.08.010(Q) and shall be designated on the final plat. 9. The paved width of 14th Street shall be 27 feet rather than the proposed 26 feet and a paved tapered transition that is approved by the City Engineer shall be provided between the 27-foot paved width and the 32-foot paved width to the east. 6 Conditions include those designed to mitigate impacts and those required by the City code. Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 18 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 37 10. A reduction of the paved width of the interior roadway from 34 feet to 24 feet with curb, gutter and sidewalk on each side and limited on street parking is conditionally approved by the City Engineer with the provision of adequate off-street parking and curve radii adequate to accommodate all emergency vehicle types. Any lesser access street standard (such as providing curb, gutter, and sidewalk on only one side of the street) must be approved by the City Engineer or such street must be maintained as a private roadway. The City and Applicant may continue to work on this issue but, again, the City Engineer must ultimately determine what standard is acceptable to the City. 11. The interior roadway shall have street trees planted in accordance with Section 3I.03 USSG on each side of the street and on the southern side of west 14th Street along the property's street frontage as approved by the Community and Economic Development Department. A Street Tree Planting Plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Forester as part of the Final Plat Application. 12. Connectivity and ADA access shall be provided between sidewalk, walking paths, and streets interior to the subject property. 13. A minimum of one shared-use path access to the Olympic Discovery Trail shall meet all current ADA requirements. Trail connections shall meet the current AASHTO minimum bike trail width standards of 8 feet hard surface with 2-foot clear zones on each side. All trail connections shall be ADA where feasible and provide ADA compliant street access. 14. Maximum residential driveway approach width shall be twenty feet. 15. An LID consent and non-protest agreement acceptable to the City for street and utility improvements to Milwaukee Drive shall be required. Improvements shall be as required by and in accordance with all applicable requirements of the of the Port Angeles Municipal Code and the City's USSG. 16. No lot may access directly to or from Milwaukee Drive or West 14th Street. 17. A recorded maintenance agreement is required for any shared driveway approaches to cottage housing on Lots 32-37. A recorded maintenance agreement shall be required for any joint use driveways serving adjoining properties. 18. All driveway approaches that intersect a sidewalk, shall be ADA compliant. 19. Any phases of development with dead-end emergency vehicle access in excess of 150 feet shall ensure a turnaround meeting the requirements of Appendix 9, Chapter 3 of the USSG, or other as approved by the Fire Marshal, is provided. Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 19 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 38 20. Water service shall be provided by an extension of the existing 8-inch water main within West 14th Street to the main in Milwaukee Drive and into the subject property. Any main extension into the property shall be a loop connection. 21. Separate metered water connections are required for each served premises per PAMC 13.32.020.A and B. Water meters are to be located within the public right of way per the City's USSG. 22. All work, including any required main extensions, shall be as required by and in accordance with all applicable requirements of the of the Port Angeles Municipal Code and the City's USSG. Any water main extension to be conveyed to and operated by the City shall meet all applicable requirements of Chapter 13.48 PAMC. 23. Sanitary sewer connection shall be from one or both existing 8-inch sanitary sewer mains located within Milwaukee Drive and West 14th Street. 24. Separate and independent service connections are to be made for each served building per PAMC 13.62.010. 25. Service laterals to be installed per the City's USSG and prior to construction of street improvements. 26. All work, including any main extension, shall be as required by and in accordance with all applicable requirements of the Port Angeles Municipal Code and the City's USSG. 27. Any sanitary sewer main extension to be conveyed to and operated by the City shall meet all applicable requirements of Chapter 13.62 PAMC. 28. The developer is responsible for providing confirmation of having obtained an NPDES general stormwater construction permit to the City of Port Angeles prior to the start of construction of Phase I. 29. Future development shall comply with the City's stormwater regulations at the time of development. 30. Stormwater requirements shall be calculated based on the plans for all lots and frontage improvement combined per PAMC 13.63.190 and may require water quality treatment and flow attenuation. 31. All minimum stormwater requirements apply to the project as presented in all phases. 32. All work shall be as required by and in accordance with all applicable requirements of the Port Angeles Municipal Code and the City's USSG. Stormwater facilities to be conveyed Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 20 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 39 to and operated by the City shall meet all applicable requirements of Chapter 13.63 PAMC. 33. Easements 10 feet in width for the full frontage of each lot shall be provided for electrical services. 34. Individually metered service connections are required for each building per PAMC 13.10.040.E. 35. Connection fees shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 36. Light for the interior roadway shall be designed in accordance with Chapter 8 of the City's USSG. 37. The developer shall provide all trenching and excavation for required lighting infrastructure along the interior roadway. 38. The installation of all required lighting infrastructure for the interior roadway must be by the City at the sole expense of the developer. DECIDED this 22"d day of November 2019. ANDREW M. REEVES Hearing Examiner Sound Law Center Findings, Conclusions, and Decision City of Port Angeles Hearing Examiner Yakovich IOZ Subdivision, Nos. 19-53& 19-54 Page 21 of 21 April 5, 2022 F - 40 To: Emma Bolin Fm: Dennis Yakovich 3/01/2022 Nathan West 1424 Rook Drive City of Port Angeles Port Angeles, WA Co-owner: Milwaukee Trails Subdivision Emma & Nathan, On behalf of my partner, Steve Wirth, and I, 1 would like to make a request to the City to use NICE funds to assist in the upgrading within W. 14th Street R/W, adjacent to our "Milwaukee Trails" subdivision. First, a little background of what our project entails. Milwaukee Trails will be 38 residence subdivision of a design that will create a neighborhood that the City currently does not have. It received preliminary approval under Chapter 17.45 of the Port Angeles Municipal code on November 22, 2019. In part, Chapter 17.45.010 states "it is intended that an IOZ will result in a residential environment of higher quality than traditional lot-by-lot development by use of a design process that includes within the site design all the components of an urban residential environment, such as walkability, access to transit, and a variety of building types". Our subdivision incorporated these elements. Milwaukee Trails will have a mix of three types of homes. It will have 5 duplex townhomes (10 total residences) that will be more affordable than single family residences and will include a longterm maintenance and repair agreement that will maintain the exterior of the homes. There will be 20 traditional single family homes. 5 of these homes will have alley access, allowing us to create a different feel for these homes than the other 15 homes that have street access only. And, finally, we will have 8 small cottages, with one or two bedrooms, on the large lot in the Southeast corner of the subdivision. They will be constructed in a courtyard configuration and will be of a design that makes for a very comfortable and appealing living environment. Note: our goal is 8 cottages. It may be as little as 6. There will be sidewalks throughout the subdivision and 5 separate open space areas with trails thru each. One of the trails will connect directly to the Olympic Discovery Trail. The HOA will maintain the open space areas, assuring that they will be an amenity for the neighborhood well into the future. Since this a private street, there will be no ongoing maintenance costs for the City. Within the Infill Overlay Zone (IOZ) chapter of the municipal code, there is a requirement to provide 20% of the residences as "attainable housing". This requirement will be satisfied using the cottages. This requirement creates some challenges for the subdivision, but it will provide homes at a reasonable price for individuals or families with moderate incomes. I would hope that this would be another reason to use NICE funds to assist the subdivision. Now, back to the request for NICE funding. It seems that this use of NICE funding fits right in with the intended purpose of what the NICE program was meant to accomplish. Not only do the street improvements help enhance the neighborhood, but our project will also set a high standard for future development all along W. 14th Street. By completing the 14th Street right-of-way upgrades and building new homes in our subdivision, we are creating a catalyst for others to begin moving ahead on the many undeveloped parcels in the area. It is natural for others to move faster if they see the neighborhood improving. Right now, we seem to be the only one moving forward. The use of NICE funds provides another catalyst for more development & building. PERSONAL.IettertocityNICEfundi ngapplication3012022.doc.lapMAC April 5, 2022 F - 41 To: Emma Bolin Fm: Dennis Yakovich 3/01/2022 Nathan West Page 2 1 would hope that this will be viewed as an opportunity for the City to rethink their approach toward creating more housing within the City. It hasn't worked to have developers spend their money to improve public infrastructure, especially when these investments have already become very marginal, given other impediments to development. The infusion of NICE funds to improve public infrastructure will help meet the challenges of building homes within the City of Port Angeles. As I mentioned above, we will be doing 8 attainable housing units as part of the subdivision. For us, this will be fun, and we are very proud to be doing this, but they definitely create an economic burden. NICE funding for 14th Street will actually help speed up the completion of those units. Additionally, it will help to speed up the development of the balance of the submission. We should get approval for Phases 1 &2 starting in the Spring and complete Phase 1 sometime in May or June. We would like to complete the 14th Street improvements at the same time. Our goal for the balance of the year would be to get the cottage lot done and get a good start on Phase 3 and be winterized by Fall. Every investment decision is based on incremental costs that weigh on the decision, until the scale turns one way or the other. Using NICE funding to help turn the scale toward doing, or in this case, completing a project, has great public benefit tied to it, especially given the housing shortage the City is currently experiencing . The section of unfinished 14th Street extends beyond our frontage both to the East and the West. In my cost summary, I have included enough funding to complete the entire stretch of the unfinished street. This will complete waterline, sidewalk, curb & gutter, drainage and asphalt along the entire unfinished length that extends beyond our frontage. I have also added a sidewalk on the south side of 14th, connecting to the Olympic Discovery Trail and to the East property line. This sidewalk is not required, but City staff wanted to include it as part of the NICE funding approval. I have agreed to that. Finally, I have included a cost breakdown of the project illustrating what the NICE funding would pay for, and what we would be paying for. PERSONAL.IettertocityNICEfundi ngapplication3012022.doc.lapMAC April 5, 2022 F - 42 To: Emma Bolin Fm: Dennis Yakovich 3/01/2022 Nathan West Page 3 City Funding Developer Funding 1) Engineering $ 1,500 2) Waterline 29,325 3) South shoulder rebuild 1,800 4) Swale on South side 1,200 5) North side curb & gutter Labor $ 7,040 Concrete 1,440 Driveway cut 350 6) North side sidewalk Labor 9,900 Concrete 2,933 Driveway 350 ADA Crossing 1,150 7) Entrance to subdivision (14th St. portion only) 4,800 8) Asphalt North Side & Milwaukee R/W 15,750 South Side of frontage plus portion to East 14,250 9) New catchbasin and connection to existing storm drain 1,500 10) New South Side sidewalk 12,000 Subtotal $ 40,413 $ 64,875 Sales Tax 8.8% $ 3,556 $ 5,577 TOTAL with Sales Tax $ 43,969 $ 70,452 Notes: Developer's total includes installation of waterline loop within 14th Street R/W. All costs are based on prevailing wage costs, but if developer is not obligated to these costs, developer's costs would be reduced. If there are any cost overruns for North side (City) components once bids are received, developer will bare the cost of overruns. PERSONAL.IettertocityNICEfundi ngapplication3012022.doc.lapMAC April 5, 2022 F - 43 Exhibit E—Prevailing Wage Rates Prevailing wages per WA Department of Labor and Industries are found here: https://lni.wa.gov/licensing-permits/public-works-protects/prevailing-wage-rates/ The applicable rates are those in effect at time of agreement execution. April 5, 2022 F - 44 tfM POR-T-ANGELES CITY COUNCIL WASH I N G T o N , u , s , MEMO Date: Apri15,2022 To: City Council From: Nathan West, City Manager Sarina Carrizosa, Finance Director Subject: 2022 Budget Amendment#1 Summary: The 2022 Budget is being amended for the first time to adjust a variety of funds to reflect changes in revenues and expenditures that have occurred during the first few months of 2022, as well as to carry budget allocations from 2021 into 2022 for unfinished projects,large purchases and programs. This budget amendment primarily includes items that are capital in nature,while future budget amendments will focus on operating and maintenance adjustments. This is the first reading of the ordinance. As this budget amendment includes new revenues as well as an authorization to use funds from reserves, the ordinance must be approved by a super-majority of the entire Council,or at least five (5) affirmative votes. Funding: Please see the detailed summary attached to this memo. Recommendation: The requested action for this issue is as follows: 1. Conduct the first reading of the ordinance for the first amendment to the 2022 Budget; and 2. Continue to the April 19,2022 Council meeting. Background / Analysis: The first amendment to the 2022 Budget will"clean-up" a variety of changes to City revenues and expenditures that occurred after the adoption of the Budget in December due to information being unavailable for entry at the time; including funding and spending related to the Waste Connections settlement payment and spending from ARPA grant funding. This amendment will also carry-over unfinished capital projects from 2021 to provide spending authority for these projects in the current budget year. The specific proposed changes are shown in detail on the following pages. The majority of the changes included have previously been approved by Council and are a result of capital projects moving from 2021 to 2022. These projects were either fully carried into the current budget year if construction had not yet begun at year end,or the remaining portion of the project was moved forward on projects that were not yet complete at the end of the 2021 fiscal year. Funding for these capital projects are from existing reserves that were set aside and held in previous years for these purposes. It is not uncommon for large scale capital projects to span multiple years for completion. Amending the budget to carry this funding allows these projects to move forward for completion on schedule. April 5, 2022 G - 1 Since many of the individual actions in this amendment require funding to come from reserves(money unspent at the end of the fiscal year automatically rolls into reserves/fund balance and must then be pulled from reserves for use in later budgets),approval of the ordinance will require a super majority of the entire Council,or five (5) affirmative votes. Attached is a detailed list of proposed budget changes and the budget amendment ordinance which includes an"Exhibit A"listing a comparision of total revenues and expenditures by fund for the 2022 Adopted Budget and proposed 2022 Amendment#1 to easily show changes in revenue,expenses,and fund balance in each fund. Tonight's meeting will include the first reading of the budget amendment ordinance,with a second reading and adoption of the ordinance scheduled to occur at the April 19t1i Council meeting. Funding Overview: Please see the "Detailed list of proposed budget changes" attachment to this memo for a full listing of all funding changes. Attached: List of proposed budget changes. 2022 Budget Ordinance—Amendment#1. Exhibit A. April 5, 2022 G - 2 Detailed List of Proposed Budget Changes-2022 Budget Amendment#1 BUDGET AMENDMENT ITEM Fl!!W�iture Account Notes Madrona Code Work Carryover 50,700 001-1210-513-41-50 Carried from 2021 Climate Resiliency Plan 28,900 001-4060-558-41-50 Carried from 2021 HB 1054 Legislative Mandates for PAPD-Expense 72,300 001-5022-521-35-01 Carried from 2021 Stonegarden Grant Overtime 10,000 001-5010-521-10-11 Council Approved 06/1/2021 Stonegarden Grant Overtime - 5,000 001-5021-521-10-11 Council Approved 06/1/2021 Fire Department Leadership Seminar 15,000 - 001-6010-369-90-00 Fire Department Leadership Seminar - 15,000 001-6045-522-31-01 PW Admin Computer Workstations roll over from 2021 7,500 001-7010-532-31-60 Carried from 2021 TR0616-ADA -Francis Street Additive Bid;Transfer 53,800 001-7012-597-59-91 Council Approved 03/15/22 Shore Metro Park District ARPA Funding 98,700 001-9029-518-41-50 Council Approved 02/O1/22 Boys&Girls Club;ARPA Funding 106,400 001-9029-518-41-50 Council Approved 11/03/21 BlackBall Ferry;ARPA Funding - 500,000 001-9029-518-41-50 Council Approved 11/03/21 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 15,000 941,500 Transfer for purchase of new truck sander - 25,000 102-7230-597-59-97 TOTAL STREET FUND - 25,000 PenCom Consoles 93,000 107-5160-337-10-20 Council Approved 03/01/22 PenCom Consoles;Transfer to Capital Account - 93,000 107-5160-597-59-91 Council Approved 03/01/22 TOTAL PENCOM FUND 93,000 93,000 PenCom Consoles Transfer from PenCom Fund 93,000 - 310-5950-397-10-91 Council Approved 03/O1/22 PenCom Consoles - 93,000 310-5950-594-65-10 Council Approved 03/01/22 FDO318-Emergency Mgmt Pods 50,000 310-5950-594-65-10 Carried from 2021 FD0615-Fire Hoses 1,100 310-5950-594-65-10 Carried from 2021 PDO116-Mobile Data Trans 2,800 310-5950-594-65-10 Carried from 2021 PD0119-Computer Aided Dispatch 57,000 310-5950-594-65-10 Carried from 2021 PDO120-Police Taser Replacement 27,200 310-5950-594-65-10 Carried from 2021 GG1113-Facility Security Projects/City Hall Cameras 15,400 310-8985-594-65-10 Carried from 2021 PK0119-Erikson Playfield Pump Track 15,400 310-8985-594-65-10 Carried from 2021 PK0216-Facility Revolving Fund 10,000 310-8985-594-65-10 Carried from 2021 PK0519-City Pier Erosion Stabilization&Sidewalk Repair(Pe( 52,100 310-8985-594-65-10 Carried from 2021 PK0819-City Pier Railing replacement 62,200 310-8985-594-65-10 Carried from 2021 PK0919-Fine Arts Center Capital Improvements - 10,100 310-8985-594-65-10 Carried from 2021 TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL FUND 93,000 396,300 TR0209-Race Street Design - 194,300 312-4160-595-65-10 Carried from 2021 TR0209-Race Street Design;Grant Carryover 2,591,100 - 312-7930-331-20-20 Carried from 2021 TR0909-Wayfinding Signage - 59,200 312-4160-595-65-10 Carried from 2021 Insurance Recoveryfor Lincoln Street 12,800 - 312-7930-372-00-00 Insurance Recovery TRO101-Laurel Street Stairs - 34,700 312-7930-595-65-10 Carried from 2021 TR0209-Race Street Design 414,400 312-7930-595-6510 Carried from 2021 TR0218-Lincoln Street Safety 425,500 312-7930-595-6510 Carried from 2021 TRO414-Peabody Creek/Lincoln Street 103,900 312-7930-595-6510 Carried from 2021 TR0616-ADA -Francis Street 5,500 312-7930-595-6510 Carried from 2021 TR0616-ADA -Francis Street Additive Bid - 53,800 312-7930-595-6510 Council Approved03/15/22 TR0616-ADA -Francis Street Additive Bid 53,800 - 312-7930-397-10-91 Council Approved03/15/22 TR0616-ADA -Francis Street Grant Carryover 300,000 - 312-7930-334-03-80 Carried from 2021 TRO621-Waterfront trail repairs - 5,200 312-7930-595-6510 Carried from 2021 TRO715-16th St LID(C-L) - 112,500 312-7930-595-6510 Carried from 2021 TRO715-16th St LID(C-L);Grant Carryover 108,100 - 312-7930-334-03-10 Carried from 2021 TR1118-Revolving Street Improvements - 60,000 312-7930-595-6510 Carried from 2021 TR0218-Lincoln Street Pavement Preservation 73,600 312-7930-595-6510 TRO320-2021 Pavement Preservation - (60,900) 312-7930-595-65-10 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT CAPITAL FUND 3,065,800 1,481,700 CLO414-Light Ops Building - 469,800 451-7188-594-65-10 Carried from 2021 TOTAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL FUND 469,800 April 5, 2022 G - 3 BUDGET AMENDMENT ITEM Revenues Expenditure Account Notes WT0218-Reservoir Repairs 37,400 452-7388-594-6510 Carried from 2021 WT0221-Race Streeet Water Main Replacement South 34,600 452-7388-594-6510 Carried from 2021 WT0419-Decant Facility at Transfer Station 22,400 452-7388-594-6510 Carried from 2021 WT0421-Race Streeet Water Main Replacement North 125,000 452-7388-594-6510 Carried from 2021 WT0521-Water Main Replacement Village/Lindberg 120,000 452-7388-594-6510 Council Approved O1/04/22 WT0619-Peabody Reservoir inlet pipe replac 40,000 452-7388-594-6510 Carried from 2021 TOTAL WATER CAPITAL FUND 379,400 WW0117-Francis Street Pigging Bypass (190,000) 453-7488-594-65-10 Budget Correction WW0117-Francis Street Pigging Bypass 190,000 463-7489-594-65-10 Budget Correction WW0220-West 4th St Capacity Improvement 60,800 453-7488-594-6510 Carried from 2021 WW0319-Wastewater Comprehensive Plan 39,600 453-7488-594-6510 Carried from 2021 WW0420-WWTP Potable Water Air-Gap 50,000 453-7488-594-6510 Carried from 2021 WW0519-Decant Facility at TsfrStation 22,400 453-7488-594-6510 Carried from 2021 TOTAL WASTEWATER CAPITAL FUND 172,800 SW0112-Decant facility at transferstation 99,100 454-7588-594-6510 Carried from 2021 SW0117-Landfill Scale Software 98,600 454-7588-594-6510 Carried from 2021 SW0120-Landfill Pump Station 17 Repair 75,000 454-7588-594-6510 Carried from 2021 SW0121-Landfill Access Road Repair 60,000 454-7588-594-6510 Carried from 2021 SW0421-Solid Waste Capital purchases 847,800 454-7588-594-6510 Carried from 2021 TOTAL SOLID WASTE CAPITAL FUND 1,180,500 DR0119-N Street Outfall Improvement 48,900 456-7688-594-6510 Carried from 2021 DR0120-Decant Facility at Transfer Station-StormwaterSoii 22,400 456-7688-594-6510 Carried from 2021 TOTAL STORMWATER CAPITAL FUND 71,300 Light Ops Building Lease 52,600 401-7180-533-45-30 Approved by Council 02/15/22 TOTAL ELECTRIC FUND 52,600 CAPWT-General Water Equipment 55,900 402-7380-594-65-10 Carried from 2021 TOTAL WATER FUND 55,900 CAPWW-General Wastewater Equipment 36,400 403-7480-594-6410 Carried from 2021 TOTAL WASTEWATER FUND 36,400 Waste Connections Final Payment-Legal Fees 175,300 404-7538-537-41-50 Waste Connections Settlement Waste Connections Final Payment 3,012,200 404-7538-582-75-10 Waste Connections Settlement Waste Connections Final Payment-Equipment 8,200 404-7538-582-75-10 Waste Connections Settlement TOTAL SOLID WASTE FUND 3,195,700 Engineering Tech/Civil Engineer;1 FTE - 120,000 406-7412-538-10-01 Council Approved 03/15/22 Ecology Capacity Grant 20,000 - 406-7412-334-03-10 Council Approved 03/15/22 TOTAL STORMWATER FUND 20,000 120,000 FDO118-Defibrillators - 36,000 409-6025-594-6410 Carried from 2021 TOTAL MEDIC I FUND - 36,000 Transfer from Streets for Truck Sander 25,000 - 501-7630-397-10-97 Purchase new Truck Sander - 25,000 501-7630-594-64-10 Budget Correction for Allocations 3,200 - 501-7630-348-30-10 Budget Correction CAPES-Equipment Services - 1,719,300 501-7630-594-6410 Carried from 2021 SW0421-Solid Waste Equipment - 2,719,800 501-7630-594-6410 Carried from 2021 TOTAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 28,200 4,464,100 Budget Correction for Allocations 6,100 - 502-2081-348-80-12 Budget Correction IT0416-Cemetery Software - 30,000 502-2082-594-6510 Carried from 2021 IT0617-Executime Scheduling Module 15,000 502-2082-594-6510 Carried from 2021 IT0618-Virtual Server Replacements 150,000 502-2082-594-6510 Carried from 2021 IT0716-ERP Road Map 41,000 502-2082-594-6510 Carried from 2021 IT1018-UPS Replacement-Disaster Recovery Data Center - 60,000 502-2082-594-6510 Carried from 2021 TOTAL IT FUND 6,100 296,000 Budget Correction for Allocations 2,400 - 503-1661-365-90-12 Budget Correction Budget Correction for Allocations 18,500 503-1671-365-90-15 Budget Correction TOTAL SELF-INSURANCE FUND 20,900 April 5, 2022 G - 4 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, amending the City's 2022 budget. WHEREAS, the Annual Budget of the City of Port Angeles for the year 2022, was adopted, approved and confirmed on December 7, 2021, in Ordinance No. 3686; and WHEREAS, now there exists an emergency that could not reasonably have been foreseen when the 2022 budget was adopted, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, do ordain as follows: Section 1. The Council finds and declares: A. There exists an emergency that could not reasonably have been foreseen when the 2022 budget was adopted. The facts constituting the emergency include, but are not limited to: 1. Unanticipated additional revenue; and 2. Unanticipated additional and reduced expenditures primarily for changes in planned capital expenditures as previously authorized by Council. B. These facts require amendments to the adopted budget in order to meet the expenses of government of the City for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. Section 2. On the basis of the foregoing findings, pursuant to RCW 35A.33.090, the City Council declares that an emergency exists. Section 3. To respond to the budget emergency, the 2022 budget appropriation for each separate fund as set forth in Ordinance No.3686, is amended as shown in the attached Exhibit A. -1- April 5, 2022 G - 5 Section 4. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to correct scrivener's errors, references, ordinance numbering, section and subsection numbers and any references thereto. Section 5. This Ordinance exercises authority granted exclusively to the City Council and is not subject to referendum. It shall be in force and take effect 5 (five) days after publication according to law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles by a vote of one more than the majority of all members of the legislative body at a regular meeting of said Council on the I91h day of April, 2022. Kate Dexter, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kari Martinez-Bailey, City Clerk William E. Bloor, City Attorney PUBLISHED: By Summary -2- April 5, 2022 G - 6 CITY of PORT ANGELES 2022 Budget Ordinance-Amendment#1 Exhibit A Funds 2022 Budget 2022 Budget Amendment#1 Fund IDiv. IName/Description Beginning I Revenue I Expendituresi Ending Beginning I Revenue I Expenditures Ending Balance I I I Balance Balance-Est.I I I Balance-Est. GENERAL FUND(Note:Divisional totals for reference only) Fund Balance: 7,839,261 6,781,961 9,827,510 7,836,910 001. 1160 City Council 14,100 71,900 24,100 71,900 001. 1110 City Manager 359,800 445,900 359,800 496,600 001. 1111 Customer Commitment 0 1,500 0 1,500 001. 1120 Human Resources 97,100 276,800 97,100 176,800 001. 1130 City Clerk 63,700 256,000 63,700 256,000 001. 1001 Finance-Revenue 14,324,200 0 14,324,200 0 001. 1020 Finance Administration 159,900 941,800 159,900 941,800 001. 1023 Accounting 679,600 981,500 679,600 981,500 001. 1025 Customer Service 1,199,000 1,187,400 1,199,000 1,187,400 001. 1070 Reprographics 37,900 46,600 37,900 46,600 001. 3030 City Attorney 172,500 555,600 172,500 555,600 001. 3011 Jail Contributions 0 950,800 0 950,800 001. 4060 Planning 431,400 733,800 431,400 762,700 001. 4050 Building 548,000 251,700 548,000 251,700 001. 4071 Economic Development 50,000 101,900 50,000 101,900 001. 5010 Police Administration 0 664,500 0 674,500 001. 5011 PenCom/Capital Transfers 356,600 537,900 356,600 537,900 001. 5021 Police Investigation 1,700 1,090,800 1,700 1,095,800 001. 5022 Police Patrol 553,100 3,643,400 553,100 3,715,700 001. 5026 Police Reserves&Volunteers 0 11,300 0 11,300 001. 5029 Police Records 13,600 465,000 13,600 465,000 001. 5050 Police Facilities Maintenance 16,300 8,100 16,300 8,100 001. 6010 Fire Administration 61,900 241,400 76,900 241,400 001. 6011 PenCom/Medic 1 Support 0 348,500 0 348,500 001. 6020 Fire Suppression 0 1,415,200 0 1,415,200 001. 6030 Fire Prevention 7,800 108,400 7,800 108,400 001. 6045 Fire Training 3,000 112,000 3,000 127,000 001. 6050 Fire Facilities Maintenance 0 59,400 0 59,400 001. 7010 Public Works Administration 1,247,700 2,182,300 1,247,700 2,189,800 001. 7011 Public Works CIP 0 15,000 0 68,800 001. 7032 Public Works Telecommunications 32,800 32,800 32,800 32,800 001. 8010 Parks Administration 0 276,200 0 276,200 001. 8011 Senior Center 33,100 165,900 33,100 165,900 001. 8050 Ocean View Cemetery 115,000 185,000 115,000 185,000 001. 8080 Park Facilities 0 2,204,100 0 2,204,100 001. 8112 Senior Center Facilities 0 57,900 0 57,900 001. 8131 Central Services Facilities 463,200 510,200 463,200 510,200 001. 8155 Facility Rentals 56,000 118,100 56,000 118,100 001. 8221 Sports Programs 0 114,000 0 114,000 001. 9029 General Unspecified 0 795,900 0 1,501,000 001 TOTAL General Fund 7,839,261 21,110,200 22,167,500 6,781,961 9,827,510 21,125,200 23,115,800 7,836,910 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 101 Lodging Excise Tax Fund 261,966 701,400 666,400 296,966 824,440 701,400 666,400 8S9,440 102 Street Fund SS6,93S 1,609,000 1,777,600 388,33S 677,348 1,609,000 1,802,600 483,748 105 Real Estate Excise Tax-1(REET-1)Fund 761,S34 306,000 1,020,200 47,334 1,048,2S1 306,000 1,020,200 334,0S1 107 PenCom Fund 1,090,OS8 4,S44,S00 4,903,800 730,7S8 1,986,822 4,637,S00 4,996,800 1,627,S22 160 Real Estate Excise Tax-2(REET-2)Fund 572,425 307,600 S2S,000 3SS,02S 883,928 307,600 S2S,000 666,S28 165 Business Improvement Area S6,945 3S,300 0 92,24S 41,0SS 35,300 0 76,3SS 172 Port Angeles Housing Rehab.Fund 363,001 1,039,300 662,700 739,601 11123,640 1,039,300 662,700 1,S00,240 175 Code Compliance Fund 35,462 161,100 161,100 35,462 39,421 161,100 161,100 39,421 TOTAL Special Revenue Funds 3,698,326 8,704,200 9,716,800 2,685,726 6,624,905 8,797,200 9,834,800 5,587,305 April 5, 2022 G - 7 CITY of PORT ANGELES 2022 Budget Ordinance-Amendment#1 Exhibit A Funds 2022 Budget 2022 Budget Amendment tit Fund IDiv. Name/Description Beginning I Revenue Expendituresi Ending Beginning I Revenue I Expenditures I Ending Balance-Est. Balance-Est. I Balance Est.I I I Balance-Est. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 216 MA LTGO Bond(Landfill Bluff Stabilization)Fund 1S6,S91 601,700 S97,200 191,391 178,462 601,700 S97,200 152,962 2" 2015 LTGO Bond-Refunding(W.U.G.A.) 16,757 232,500 231,700 17,S87 14,353 232,500 231,700 15,1S3 TOTAL Debt Service Funds 203,678 834,200 828,900 208,978 192,815 834,200 828,900 198,115 ENTERPRISE/UTILITY FUNDS 401 Electric Utility Fund 9,316,043 2S,390,300 2S,390,300 9,316,043 11,443,6S7 2S,390,300 2S,442,900 11,391,0S7 402 Water Utility Fund 10,126,204 6,847,100 7,546,300 9,427,004 16,907,671 6,847,100 9,602,200 14,1S2,S71 403 Wastewater Utility Fund 3,131,916 7,161,300 7,361,300 2,931,916 3,380,413 7,161,300 7,397,700 3,144,013 404 Solid Waste Utility Fund 1,312,026 12,334,000 12,360,S00 1,28S,S26 2,797,879 14,334,000 1S,SS6,200 1,S7S,679 406 Stormwater Utility Fund 2,091,457 2,763,000 2,692,800 2,161,6S7 2,211,487 2,783,000 2,812,800 2,181,687 409 Medic 1 Utility Fund 1,182,599 3,006,700 3,424,200 765,099 1,407,454 3,006,700 3,460,200 953,954 413 Harbor Clean-up Fund (27S,S39) 2,047,600 2,047,600 (27S,S39) (152,367) 2,047,600 2,047,600 (152,367) 421 Conservation Fund 657,759 305,000 296,500 666,259 575,352 305,000 296,S00 SS3,S52 TOTAL Enterprise/Utility Funds 27,539,195 59,855,000 61,119,500 26,274,695 38,571,546 61,875,000 66,616,100 33,830,446 ENTERPRISE/INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 501 1 1 Equipment Services 3,28S,SS8 1,91S,800 2,376,900 2,524,4S8 13,S03,274 1,944,000 6,841,000 8,606,274 502 1 1 Information Technology 2,412,910 2,724,900 4,394,000 743,810 4,184,878 2,731,000 4,690,000 2,22S,878 503 1 Self-Insurance 692,424 6,136,200 6,136,200 692,424 565,140 6,1S7,100 6,136,200 S86,040 TOTAL Internal Service Funds 6,390,892 10,776,900 12,907,100 4,260,692 18,253,292 10,832,100 17,667,200 11,418,192 FIDUCIARY FUNDS 602 1 1 Firemen's Pension Fund 1 214,162 19,200 92,600 140,762 214,162 19,200 92,600 140,762 TOTAL Fiduciary Funds 214,162 19,200 92,600 140,762 214,162 19,200 92,600 140,762 PERMANENT FUNDS 601 1 ICemetery Endowment Fund 427,060 6,000 0 433,060 418,607 6,000 0 424,607 TOTAL Permanent Funds 427,060 6,000 0 433,060 418,607 6,000 0 424,607 CAPITAL FUNDS 310 Governmental Capital Improvement Fund 3,227,450 S,006,100 8,004,600 228,9S0 3,477,644 S,099,100 8,400,900 17S,844 312 Transportation Capital 6,453,958 2,146,700 7,882,200 718,4S8 4,37S,6S1 S,212,S00 9,363,900 224,2S1 316 Governmental Park Improvement Fund 302,S37 9,200 0 311,737 307,928 9,200 0 317,128 451 Electric Capital Fund 11,401,818 800,000 7,798,000 4,403,818 12,430,778 800,000 8,267,800 4,962,978 452 Water Capital Fund 4,S36,003 72S,000 2,736,000 2,S2S,003 4,769,111 72S,000 3,115,400 2,378,711 453 Wastewater Capital Fund 3,246,128 9S0,000 2,064,S00 2,131,628 3,618,8S2 9S0,000 2,047,300 2,S21,SS2 454 Solid Waste Capital Fund 1,653,3S4 1,8SS,600 2,613,400 89S,SS4 2,270,260 1,8SS,600 3,793,900 331,960 4561 Stormwater Capital Fund 2,605,973 434,000 1,16S,200 1,874,773 2,860,342 434,000 1,236,500 2,057,542 463 Combined Sewer Overflow Capital Fund 1,601,225 2,321,900 2,320,200 1,602,925 1,569,255 2,321,900 2,510,200 1,350,95. TOTAL Capital Funds 35,028,446 14,248,500 34,584,100 14,692,846 35,679,824 17,407,300 38,735,900 14,351,224 SUB-TOTALALL FUNDS 81,341,020 115,554,200 141,416,500 55,475,720 109,782,661 120,896,200 156,891,300 73,787,561 Reserves-Designated 547,800 498,S00 Reserves Used 26,410,100 36,493,600 TOTAL CITYWIDE ALL FUNDS 81,341,020 141,964,300 141,964,300 55,478,720 109,782,661 157,389,800 157,389,800 73,787,561 April 5, 2022 G - 8 .;G� POR-T-ANGELES CITY COUNCIL WASH I N G T O N , u , S , MEMO Date: April 5,2022 To: City Council From: Nathan A.West, City Manager Brian Smith,Police Chief Corey Delikat,Parks and Recreation Director Ken Dubuc,Fire Chief Subject: Volunteer Practice Field Discussion and Resolution Summary: In the early 1990s,the City of Port Angeles,donors,and dedicated volunteers developed Volunteer Field,located at West 18t1i Street and South L Street,establishing much-needed space for local youth and recreational groups. Currently, a portion of this property,including the Volunteer Practice Field,is being considered as a potential site for a Joint Public Safety Facility(JPSF). The proposed facility would provide efficient and cost-effective lifesaving,emergency services to a population of approximately 80,000 people in Clallam County. If the property is selected as the site of the JPSF,the City assures the people of Port Angeles that youth recreational activities on main Volunteer Field will be secure. Funding: Additional funding assessments will be completed in conjunction with future Council actions. Recommendation: Pass the resolution to ensure youth recreational activities on the main Volunteer Field will be secure in perpetuity. Additionally, should the potential location for the Joint Public Safety Facility be selected,the resolution will ensure opportunities for substantial public input regarding the mitigation process for the loss of the practice field. Background / Analysis: In the early 1990s,the City of Port Angeles,donors,and dedicated volunteers developed Volunteer Field, located at West 18t1i Street and South L Street,establishing much-needed space for local youth and recreational groups. Currently, a portion of this property,including the Volunteer Practice Field, is being considered as a potential site for a Joint Public Safety Facility (JPSF). The proposed facility would provide efficient and cost-effective lifesaving emergency services to a population of approximately 80,000 people in Clallam County. The City recognizes the importance of youth activities and the effect the displacement of the Volunteer Practice Field may cause if the location is selected as the site of the JPSF. If the location is selected,the City is committed to placing an additional practice field of equal or better quality in the near vicinity. City staff have prepared a resolution to assure the people and especially the youth of Port Angeles that the main field will not be part of any future development,other than mitigation improvements to the field if the Volunteer Practice Field is the chosen location for the JPSF. Additionally, the resolution ensures opportunities for substantial public input regarding the mitigation process for the loss of Volunteer Practice Field,should this site be chosen. A special meeting was conducted earlier this evening to obtain input from the public. April 5, 2022 H - 1 Staff recommend City Council pass the resolution to ensure youth recreational activities on the main Volunteer Field will be secure in perpetuity and allow for substantial opportunities for public input regarding the mitigation process. Funding Overview: Additional funding assessments will be completed in conjunction with future Council actions. April 5, 2022 H - 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles,Washington, addressing concerns related to the potential development of a Joint Public Safety Facility(JPSF)on the Volunteer Practice Field off 181h&L Street. WHEREAS, the City, donors, and a dedicated group of volunteers spent several years in the late 1980's and early 1990's creating Volunteer Field and the Volunteer Practice Field. WHEREAS, this project was critical because of the much-needed space for Olympic Junior Babe Ruth Baseball, for youth ages 13-15, and Junior Soccer; and WHEREAS, the City and County are looking to find property to build a Joint Public Safety Facility (JPSF); such a joint facility is the most efficient and cost-effective way to address the need to provide life-saving emergency services daily to a population of approximately 80,000 people in Clallam County; and WHEREAS, the City also recognizes the importance of youth activities and the effect the displacement of the Volunteer Practice Field might cause if this is the selected site. WHEREAS, if the Volunteer Practice Field is selected as the site for the JPSF project, as mitigation the City will make improvements to the main Volunteer Field; apart from those improvements, the City is creating this resolution to ensure the citizens and especially the youth of Port Angeles that the main Volunteer Field will not be part of any future development. WHEREAS,the City is also committed to placing an additional practice field in the near vicinity that will be equal or better than the current practice field at Volunteer Field. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, that: 1. If the Volunteer Practice Field is selected as the site for the JPSF project, the City Council will ensure youth recreational activities on the main Volunteer Field will be secure in perpetuity. If the site is selected, City staff will bring forward to the Council in a future meeting a Memorandum of Understanding to ensure the Main Volunteer Field will not be involved in any future projects, other than mitigation improvements. 2. If the Volunteer Practice Field is selected as the site for the JPSF project, the mitigation process will include opportunities for substantial public input. April 5, 2022 H - 3 3. If the Volunteer Practice Field is selected, the City is also committed to placing an additional practice field in the near vicinity that will be equal to or better than the current practice field at Volunteer Field. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the fifth day of April, 2022. Kate Dexter, Mayor ATTEST: Kari Martinez-Bailey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William E. Bloor, City Attorney April 5, 2022 H - 4 -;G� POR-T-ANGELES CITY COUNCIL WASH I N G T O N , u , S , MEMO Date: April 5, 2022 To: City Council From: William E Bloor, City Attorney Subject: Two Resolutions Relating to Nuisances and Blight at 204 E.Front St. Summary: The property located at 204 E.Front Street,Port Angeles,Washington,is the site of persistent nuisance, fire, and maintenance code violations. These violations have persisted for over I I years despite repeated enforcement contacts made by City officials. Events in the recent past, including a fire and a medical emergency in the building,have demonstrated that the building is a hazard to the public. On March 30, the City Manager issued a Declaration of Emergency and Order for Emergency Abatement. Tonight the Council is asked to ratify that Declaration. In addition, even after emergency abatement,the property is a blight on the surrounding neighborhood, including the downtown corridor. One remedy for this blighted property is condemnation. Prior to condemnation, the City Council must adopt a resolution declaring that the acquisition of 204 E. Front Street is necessary to eliminate neighborhood blight and authorizing the commencement of condemnation proceedings. Funding: All costs associated with acquiring property through condemnation proceedings will be paid from the Code Compliance fund. Recommendation: I) Adopt the Resolution to ratify the Declaration of Emergency and Order for Emergency Abatement signed by City Manager West on March 30,2022. 2) Adopt the Resolution to ratify and declare the acquisition of real property located at 204 East Front Street, Port Angeles, Washington, is necessary to eliminate neighborhood blight and authorizing condemnation of such property. Background /Analysis: Since 2011,the real property located at 204 E. Front Street has been the subject of numerous nuisance complaints based on the owner's failure to prevent unauthorized persons from entering the building for purposes of drug use and temporary habitation. The owner permits an accumulation of garbage,litter, and debris,which includes,but is not limited to,improperly stored bottles,cans,paper,glass,plastic,cardboard,discarded or broken appliances,furniture,equipment, bicycles or parts thereof,pallets,mattresses,clothing,household goods,construction materials, and lumber,which provides harborage for rats and other vermin and is a fire hazard. The building does not have power or water service. The owner has allowed this unoccupied building to remain open to entrance through broken,missing,or open doors,windows,or other openings, so that the same is used by unauthorized persons,in a manner detrimental to the health and welfare of the inhabitants of the City. The City has provided the owner numerous opportunities to remedy the illegal,unsafe and unsanitary April 5, 2022 H - 5 conditions at this property. The City has contacted the owner at the following times to request the property be brought into compliance with the City Municipal Code—January 2011,June 2011,March 2012,November 2013,May 2015,January 2021,June 2021, and September 2021. Each time he was contacted,the owner promised to bring the building into compliance with the City Municipal Code, and each time he failed to do so. On March 26,2022 the Fire Department was called to this building because there was a fire in its interior. Fire Department personnel extinguished the fire and noted substantial evidence that demonstrated large numbers of persons were residing in this building,which was not safe or healthy for occupancy. Following this fire,the Fire Department personnel observed the following conditions in the building's interior—the floor was littered with numerous miscellaneous possessions,copious amounts of garbage, human feces,drug paraphernalia, and at least four tents set up inside on the second floor. During the early morning hours of March 30,the Fire Department was called again to the building. There they found six unauthorized occupants,one of whom was suffering a medical emergency. The building is made of brick, and the masonry structure of the building is crumbling in several locations. The entire south wall of the second floor appears to be propped up with wooden angle braces, several masonry interior walls are breached; and all the interior fire-resistive construction has been removed resulting in all-wooden structural elements being exposed. The property is currently in a state of complete disrepair,dilapidation, and damage to the extent that it poses a threat of structural failure. In the afternoon of March 30,the City Manager,on the recommendation of the Fire Chief,the Chief of Police,the Director of Public Works and Utilities, and the City Attorney,issued a Declaration of Emergency and Order for Emergency Abatement, a copy of which is included in the packet. Chapter 35.80A RCW authorizes cities to acquire by condemnation properties that are a blight on the surrounding neighborhood. A property is a blight on the surrounding neighborhood if it meets two of the following factors: 1)a dwelling,building,or structure exists on the property that has not been lawfully occupied for a period of one year or more; 2)the executive authority,or his designee,determines that the property constitutes a threat to the public health, safety,or welfare; or 3)the property has been associated with illegal drug activity within the previous twelve months. On March 30,2022 the City Manager's designee, Emma Bolin, Interim Director of the Department of Community and Economic Development. determined that the 204 E. Front Street property constitutes a threat to the public health,safety or welfare based on the reports she reviewed regarding the condition of the property,both past and present. Several City officials have confirmed that the property has not been lawfully occupied for a period of one year or more. The evidence gathered by City officials support the finding that the 204 E. Front Street Property is a blight on the surrounding neighborhood. In order to acquire the property through condemnation,the City Council must adopt a resolution declaring that the acquisition of the property is necessary to eliminate neighborhood blight. The next step will be to file a petition in Superior Court to initiate the condemnation proceedings. The attached Resolution authorizes the City Attorney,or his designee,to commence this process. Funding Overview: The costs of all actions relating to the property at 204 Front St will be paid from the Code Compliance fund. April 5, 2022 H - 6 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, affirming and ratifying the Declaration of Emergency and Order for Emergency Abatement issued by the City Manager on March 30, 2022. WHEREAS, a Declaration of Emergency and Order for Emergency Abatement (the Declaration) was issued by the City Manager on March 30, 2022, a complete copy of which is attached; and WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the facts and circumstances that prompted the Declaration; and WHEREAS, the Council hereby finds that the facts recited in the Declaration are true and correct. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles: I. The Council finds and declares that the current condition of the building located at 204 E. Front Street creates an immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare; and therefore, the building constitutes an emergency that must be abated; and 2. The City Council affirms and ratifies (1) the Declaration and (2) all actions taken and contracts made under authority of that Declaration. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 5th day of April, 2022. Kate Dexter, Mayor ATTEST: Kari Martinez-Bailey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William E. Bloor, City Attorney April 5, 2022 H - 7 DECLARATION OF EMERGENCY AND ORDER FOR EMERGENCY ABATEMENT Nathan West, the City Manager of the City of Port Angeles, finds that the following facts exist: WHEREAS,pursuant to PAMC 2.90.170.A whenever a condition constitutes an immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare or to the environment, the City Manager is authorized to summarily abate the condition.Notice of such abatement,including the reason for it,must be given to the person responsible for the violation as soon as reasonably possible, whether before or after the abatement action is initiated.; and WHEREAS, I have determined that Emergency Abatement action, as authorized by Chapter 2.90 (Compliance and Enforcement) of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC), is necessary regarding real property located at 204 E. Front Street, Now, Therefore, I issue the following Order for Emergency Abatement: This Order is based on the following Findings of Fact: On March 26, 2022 the Fire Department received a report of a fire at the building located at 204 E. Front Street. The Fire Department arrived and found a fire located on the ground floor of this building. The fire had been started as a "warming fire" inside the building, where a large number of unauthorized persons were gathered; Fire Department personnel extinguished the fire and noted substantial evidence that demonstrated large numbers of persons were residing in this building, which was not safe or healthy for occupancy. Following this fire, the Fire Department personnel observed the following conditions in the building's interior—the floor was littered with numerous miscellaneous possessions, copious amounts of garbage, human feces, drug paraphernalia, and at least four tents set up inside on the second floor. The building is made of brick, and the masonry structure of the building is clearly crumbling in several locations. The entire south wall of the second floor appears to be propped up with wooden angle braces, several masonry interior walls are breached; and all the interior fire-resistive construction has been removed resulting in all wooden structural elements being exposed. The property is currently in a state of complete disrepair in that the building is, dilapidated, unsafe, damaged, and in disrepair to the extent that it poses a threat of structural failure. Since 2011, the real property located at 204 E. Front Street has been the subject of numerous nuisance complaints based on the owner's failure to prevent unauthorized persons from entering the building for purposes of drug use and temporary habitation. The owner permits an April 5, 2022 H - 8 accumulation of garbage, litter, and debris,which includes,but is not limited to, improperly stored bottles,cans,paper,glass,plastic,cardboard,discarded or broken appliances,furniture,equipment, bicycles or parts thereof, pallets, mattresses, clothing, household goods, construction materials, and lumber, which provides harborage for rats or other vermin, and which is a fire hazard. The owner has allowed this unoccupied building to remain open to entrance because of broken, missing, or open doors, windows, or other openings, so that the same is used by unauthorized persons, in a manner detrimental to the health and welfare of the inhabitants of the City. The City has provided the owner of this property numerous opportunities to remedy the illegal, unsafe and unsanitary conditions at this property. The City has contacted the owner at the following times to request the property be brought into compliance with the City Municipal Code—January 2011, June 2011, March 2012, November 2013, May 2015, January 2021, June 2021, and September 2021. Each time he was contacted the owner promised to bring the building into compliance with the City Municipal Code, and each time he failed to do so. Based on the conditions detailed above, I have concluded that the condition of the building constitutes an immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare; and NOW, THEREFORE,by the authority granted to me under State law and by the City Council, for the reasons set forth above, I hereby declare that an emergency exists in Port Angeles caused by the condition of the building located at 204 E. Front Street, and I order, authorize, and direct the following: 1. Emergency abatement of the conditions of the building located at 204 E. Front Street be initiated and carried out pursuant to PAMC 2.90.170.A; and 2. That notice be given to the property owner immediately; and 3. That the departments of the City to work together to immediately secure the building so to prevent further unauthorized access to it and expend general funds of the City as necessary to accomplish that purpose. 4. City staff will take whatever action is determined to be appropriate to respond to the emergency conditions, including entering into contracts and incur obligations necessary to combat such emergency situation to protect the health and safety of persons and the preservation of property. 5. Each City Department is authorized to exercise the powers vested under this Declaration and Order in light of the emergency situation without regard to time-consuming procedures and formalities prescribed by law(excepting mandatory constitutional requirements). 6. I declare that the actions authorized by this Declaration are necessary to avoid an imminent threat to the public health or safety, to prevent an imminent danger to public and private property, and these actions must be taken within an appropriate time to respond to the emergency. 7. As soon as practicable,I will advise and consult with the City Council with respect to all actions taken under the authority of this Declaration. Any contract entered into under the authority of this 2 April 5, 2022 H - 9 Declaration will be presented to the City Council at the earlies practical time for review and appropriate legislation. 8. This Declaration will take effect on my signature, and will remain in effect until I rescinded in writing. DATED this ' day of March 2022. Nathan West, City Manager April 5, 2022 H - 10 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, declaring that the acquisition of real property located at 204 East Front Street, Port Angeles, Washington, is necessary to eliminate neighborhood blight and authorizing condemnation of such property. WHEREAS, Chapter 35.80A RCW authorizes cities to acquire blighted property by condemnation; and WHEREAS, the real property located at 204 East Front Street, in Port Angeles, Washington, is the site of persistent public nuisances despite enforcement actions taken by public officials; and WHEREAS,the property located at 204 East Front Street is a blight on the surrounding neighborhood because: 1) a dwelling, building, or structure existing on the property has not been lawfully occupied for a period of one year or more; and 2) the property, dwelling, building, or structure constitutes a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare as determined by the City Manager's designee, Emma Bolin, Interim Director of Community and Economic Development; and WHEREAS, multiple efforts of the City of Port Angeles officials have been unsuccessful in prompting the owners to address the nuisances and correct the unsafe conditions, thus it is appropriate that the property be declared a blighted property and that the property be condemned for the public use described in Chapter 35.80A RCW; and WHEREAS. On March 30, 2022 City Manager Nathan West issued a Declaration of Emergency and Order for Emergency Abatement of conditions that constitute an immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare or to the environment; WHEREAS, on March 30, 2022, the City personally served the owner of the property April 5, 2022 H - 11 located at 204 East Front Street,Port Angeles,Washington,that the Port Angeles City Council would consider a resolution during its April 5, 2022 meeting to declare that the acquisition of the real property is necessary to eliminate neighborhood blight and authorizing the condemnation of the property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles as follows: Section 1. The Port Angeles City Council finds: A. The City Manager's designee, Emma Bolin, Interim Director of Community and Economic Development has determined that the property, including dwellings, buildings, and structures, located at 204 East Front Street constitutes a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. The determination by Emma Bolin, Interim Director of Community and Economic Development is supported by the Reports of City Building Inspector Jim Lierly, Fire Marshall Mike Sanders, Code Enforcement Officer Glenn McFall and Fire Chief Ken Dubuc, including the supporting materials, and is incorporated herein by reference. B. A dwelling, building, or other structure exists on the property located at 204 East Front Street, Port Angeles, Washington, that has not been lawfully occupied for a period of one year or more. C. A Report of the conditions of the property located at 204 East Front Street that was delivered to the City Council and is incorporated by reference. Section 2. The Port Angeles City Council declares that the dwellings, buildings, other structures, and property located at 204 East Front Street, Port Angeles, Washington, constitute a blight on the surrounding neighborhood. Section 3. The Port Angeles City Council declares that the acquisition of real property located at 204 E. Front Street, and more particularly described below, is necessary to April 5, 2022 H - 12 eliminate neighborhood blight. The property located at 204 East Front Street, Port Angeles, Washington, is more particularly described as follows: LOT 8 BL 17 NORMAN R. SMTH SUBD. Situate in County of Clallam, State of Washington. Clallam County Parcel No. 063000511710 Section 4. The Port Angeles City Attorney, and designees of the Port Angeles City Attorney, are hereby authorized to commence condemnation to acquire the property described hereinabove and to take such further steps as are consistent herewith and within the provisions of state law, including Chapter 35.80A RCW and Title 8 RCW. Section 5. The costs to be paid by the City in connection with the condemnation and acquisition of the premises by this condemnation shall be paid from the City's general fund. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 5th of April, 2022. Kate Dexter, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kari Martinez-Bailey, City Clerk William E. Bloor, City Attorney April 5, 2022 H - 13 I DECLARATION OF EMMA BOLIN 2 I, Emma Bolin, under penalty of perjury declare and state the following: 3 I, Emma Bolin, am over the age of eighteen, competent to make this determination, and 4 make it using my personal knowledge and the official records of the City of Port Angeles. 5 The City of Port Angeles is a non-charter code city operating under the council-manager 6 form of government. The City Manager is the executive authority for the City of Port Angeles 7 pursuant to RCW 35A.13.010. 8 Nathan West was appointed as the City Manager for the City of Port Angeles by the Port 9 Angeles City Council in 2018. City Manager West has continually served as the City Manager for 10 the City of Port Angeles since his appointment. 11 I am employed as the Interim Director of Community and Economic Development for the 12 City of Port Angeles. I have been designated by City Manager West to make this determination. I 13 make this determination under this authority. 14 I am familiar with the property located at 204 East Front Street,Port Angeles, Washington. 15 I have reviewed information provided by City Building Inspector Jim Lierly, Fire Marshall Mike 16 Sanders Code Enforcement Officer Glenn McFall and Fire Chief Ken Dubuc regarding the 17 conditions, activities, and use of the property located at 204 East Front Street, Port Angeles, 18 Washington, and the impact the conditions, activities, and use of the property have on the 19 surrounding neighborhood. 20 I am familiar with the definition of blight as defined in RCW 35.80A.010. 21 Pursuant to my authority as the City Manager's designee, I hereby determine and declare 22 that the property, including dwellings, buildings, and structures, located at 204 East Front Street, 23 PORT ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY 321 East Fifth Street Port Angeles,WA 98362 Declaration of Emma Bolin- 1 Phone:360-417-4536*Fax:360-417-4529 William E.Bloor,WSBA# 4 14 April 5, 2022 Christopher C.Cowgill WS 1t3 I Port Angeles, Washington, is a property constituting a threat to the public health, safety, and 2 welfare. I base this determination and declaration on the following: 3 • Report of Building Inspector Jim Lierly and exhibits attached thereto; • Report of Code Enforcement Officer Glenn McFall and exhibits attached thereto; 4 • Report of Fire Marshal Mike Sanders and exhibits attached thereto; and 5 • Report of Fire Chief Ken Dubuc and the exhibits attached thereto; The Reports of the City Building Inspector, the City Code Enforcement Officer, City Fire 6 Marshal and City Fire Chief document the threat to public health, safety, and welfare posed by the 7 property located at 204 East Front Street. The Reports of the City Code Enforcement Officer, City 8 Fire Marshal and City Fire Chief demonstrate that the property is the site of persistent health, 9 safety, and welfare code violations despite actions taken by public officials. The observations of 10 these City officials have documented the existence of: 11 • Fire hazards; 12 • Unsafe or partially destroyed structure; 13 • Overgrown weeds/grass; • A continuing failure by the owner to secure the building; 14 • A constant accumulation of trash and debris; and • Transients accessing the abandoned building. 15 Based on the above facts, which are supported by official records of the City of Port 16 Angeles,I hereby determine that theproperty, dwellin buildings, and structures at 204 East Front g � Y g� g � 17 Street in the City of Port Angeles constitute a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare 18 pursuant to RCW 35.80A.010. 19 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington 20 that the foregoing is true and correct. 21 DATED at Port Angeles, Washington, this 30th day of March, 2022. 22 23 „� Emma Bolin PORT ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY 321 East Fifth Street Port Angeles,WA 98362 Declaration of Emma Bolin- 2 Phone:360-417-4536*Fax:360-417-4529 William E.Bloor,WSBA# 4 April 5, 2022 Christopher C.Cowgill W S 'AS REPORT OF GLENN MCFALL I am employed as a Code Enforcement Officer for the City of Port Angeles. I have been a Code Enforcement Officer for one year. Prior to being a Code Enforcement Officer I was employed by the Port Angeles Police Department as a Parking Enforcement Officer for nine and one-half years. My current job duties include receiving complaints of code violations from concerned citizens; investigating and documenting reported code violations; preparing reports related to reported code violations; and issuing appropriate notices in cases of confirmed code violations. I am familiar with the City's longstanding efforts to induce Mr. Gladwin to clean up, secure, or repair his property located at 204 E. Front Street in the City of Port Angeles. I have personally inspected this property many times. I have reviewed the City's code compliance file regarding this property. This file is kept in the normal course of City business. The City's code compliance file provides notes from which the following chronology was compiled. Chronology of Continuing Violation January 2011 City officials spoke to Mr. Gladwin on Friday January 14, 2011 regarding securing his property. The rear window(previously boarded up)had been broken into. The rear of the property is covered in graffiti and looks like part of a cover over the door has been torn off. It appears that 4x4 lumber was used to break in. Following a recheck on Monday January 18, 2011 it was determined that the property has not been secured. Mr. Gladwin was advised that the property needed to be maintained to the minimum standards set forth in the Port Angeles Municipal Code. The trash, debris,broken glass, old siding April 5, 2022 H - 16 and roofing strewn about the property needed to be removed. The rear of the property needed to be maintained so it is not an attractive nuisance and an area for vagrants to congregate. Broken gutters needed to be removed or repaired. The leaking in the building needed to be repaired. In the future any graffiti needed to be covered within ten days of discovery or notification by the City. Mr. Gladwin complied with the City's requirements and it was resolved to the City's satisfaction by January 29, 2011. June-July 2011 Mr. Gladwin was again contacted by the City on June 23, 2011 and was told that all trash, debris and old appliances needed to be cleaned up and removed from the property. He was also told that the window on the south side of building must be secured within the next 24 hours and that the building must remain secure so it is not an attractive nuisance and gathering place for vagrants. He was again told that all graffiti must be removed or painted over and any graffiti must be removed within 10 days of notification. He was notified that all grass and weeds must be cut and maintained to 12" or less in height per the City Municipal Code. All branches must be trimmed back to keep the area from being used as a place for vagrants to gather. He was also told that the needed to secure the building within 24 hours of the Notice he received. Mr. Gladwin complied with the City's requirements and it was resolved to the City's satisfaction by July 26, 2011. March 2012-August 2013 Several attempts have been made in the past to get Mr. Gladwin to maintain this property to the minimum standards in the PAMC. The structure was discovered once again to be unsecured, covered in graffiti,with possible structural damage caused by water infiltration. The property was April 5, 2022 H - 17 covered with trash and debris. It had broken glass and the rear doors were torn off. Plywood securing the rear windows was also torn off. Water was infiltrating the structure and may have caused a large crack in the side wall. The structure should be inspected to determine if it is structurally safe. The City attempted to contact Mr. Gladwin by phone several times, leaving messages about securing the building and did not receive a timely a return call. As of April 13, 2012, the glass in one of the Front Street doors had been broken out. Another message was left for Mr. Gladwin informing him of this and asking that he return the City's call. Mr. Gladwin eventually called and said he would secure the building. His intent is to get the building cleaned up to sell. His plan is to sell the property that summer. He was aware that an inspection would happen on April 17, 2012 to make sure the building has been secured. He stated he would design a work plan that was acceptable to the city. The City received another call from Mr. Gladwin on May 11, 2012. He indicated that he would be continuing to work on the property on the weekend cleaning it up to sell. Mr. Gladwin eventually complied with the City's requirements and it was resolved to the City's satisfaction by August 19, 2013. November 2013-June 2017 On November 18, 2013 graffiti was observed on the east and south walls. The property was strewn with trash and debris. There was a significant amount of overgrown vegetation seen. On May 27, 2015 an inspection revealed an open, vacant, unsanitary, and unsafe building. Tall weeds and grass were observed, along with graffiti. The property was deemed to be an attractive nuisance. The City posted structure for no occupancy. On May 28, 2015 the City spoke with the owner. He said he would be in town next weekend to secure the door, clean up, mow the grass, and paint over the graffiti. April 5, 2022 H - 18 Mr. Gladwin eventually complied with the City's requirements and it was resolved to the City's satisfaction by June 21, 2017. January 2021-June 2021 At approximately 9:15 a.m. on the morning of January 21, 2021 Code Enforcement Officers Brown and Buchanan conducted a visual inspection of the property located at 204 E.Front St. as the result of citizen and City employee complaints. Officer Brown took several photographs of the north side of the building on Front Street. The front door of the building was not secure, and the door had broken glass from forced entry. The building is currently without power. A large amount of refuse could be observed through the windows, and evidence of trespass was visible in the building as a new tent was pitched inside the structure. There was a large amount of garbage visible through the windows that included drug paraphernalia that could pose a health and safety hazard to anyone who should have to enter the building. The second story windows were in disrepair and breaking out of the frames. Pieces of glass have already fallen to the street requiring City staff to close off an area to protect pedestrian traffic. Makeshift covers have been put up to block visibility of the interior of the second floor. The backside of the lot had evidence of entry into the second floor of the building via holes in the siding and an unsecured door that appeared to have been kicked in. The back wall of the second floor appears to be in poor condition and at risk of collapse. Refuse was present on the extent of the lot underneath the powerlines. The wood fagade on the back of the building was rotten and sliding off the building. There appeared to be fire damage extending into the building's second floor. There was a large amount of debris as well as a burnt retaining wall present in the April 5, 2022 H - 19 back portion of the lot. Officers Brown and Buchanan determined that several code violations are present and would follow up with attempt to contact the property owner to secure the premise. On January 21, 2021 Officers Brown and Buchanan attempted to contact the owner of 204 E. Front Street at his residence and were unsuccessful. Officer Brown followed up with a phone call on January 25, 2021 with no answer. The owner was left a message to contact her as soon as possible regarding the property at 204 E. Front Street. Mr. Gladwin secured the property in late January 2021. June 2021 Fire Marshal Sanders inspected the property on June 14, 2021. He found numerous Fire Code violations and posted"No Occupancy" signs on the building. His inspections also revealed that there had been no improvements over the conditions observed by Officers Brown and Buchanan in January 2021. September 2021 Despite repeated promises by the owner that the building would be secured the building is not secured from the north, south or roof. No occupancy signs are still visible and posted on the building. The building is clearly being occupied and is a health and structural hazard. On September 22, 2021 in responding to a call for assistance the Port Angeles Fire Department discovered an unconscious male inside the building. Along with the Port Angeles Police Department, the responding units were able to awake the man and found another person living inside—both were told to vacate. With the cold weather coming,the Fire Department is concerned about increased occupancy and risk of fire. April 5, 2022 H - 20 VIOLATIONS OF THE PORT ANGELES MUNICIPAL CODE During my inspections of the property and review of the Code Enforcement file, the following violations have been documented: Allowing overgrown, uncultivated, or unkempt vegetation of any type, including, but not limited to, shrubs, brush, trees, weeds, blackberries, and grasses over one foot in height (PAMC 8.30.045.C.2.a); Allowing vegetation exceeding 12 inches in height, excluding any cultivated,tended plants and flowers within a flower bed or container, shrubbery, or trees (PAMC 8.30.045.C.2.b); Allowing dead, decaying or diseased trees or branches (PAMC 8.30.045.C.2.d); and Allowing growth of noxious weeds or any toxic vegetation (PAMC 8.30.045.C.2.e). See Exhibits 13-16, 19-20, 27-34 and 50.; Allowing an accumulation of garbage, litter, debris, rubble, hazardous waste, or blight, which includes, but is not limited to, improperly stored bottles, cans, paper, glass, plastic, cardboard, auto parts, tires, scrap metal, scrap woods, discarded or broken appliances, furniture, equipment,bicycles or parts thereof,barrels,boxes, crates,pallets,mattresses, clothing,household goods, construction materials, lumber, metal, improperly piled or stored firewood, or anything in which flies may breed or multiply, which provides harborage for rats or other vermin, or which may be a fire hazard (PAMC 8.30.045.C.3.a); and Allowing accumulations of broken or neglected items, litter, salvage materials, and junk not in an approved enclosed structure (PAC 8.30.045.C.3.b). See Exhibits 1-2, 13-21,28-29,31-37, 39-40, 42-45, 47-50 and 52.; April 5, 2022 H - 21 Allowing the presence of any unsightly, abandoned, or deteriorated building or structure; or any building or structure constructed with inappropriate materials, or improperly fastened together or anchored against the forces of nature (PANIC 8.30.045.E.1); and Allowing buildings, structures, fences or other constructed objects that are decayed, dilapidated, or unsafe, damaged, or in disrepair to the extent that they pose a threat of collapse, structural failure, or falling (PAMC 8.30.045.E.2). See Exhibits 1-3, 5-6, 10, 15-21, 32,35-47, 48-50, 52, 55-57 and 61-62. Based on my continuous inspections of the property, I have observed that the structure on the property has not been lawfully occupied for a period of one year or more. April 5, 2022 H - 22 REPORT OF JAMES LIERLY I am employed as the Building Inspector for the City of Port Angeles. I have been the Building Inspector for 17 years. As part of my job, I assist in the City's code compliance efforts. I am familiar with the City's longstanding efforts to induce Mr. Gladwin to clean up, secure, or repair his property located at 204 E. Front Street in the City of Port Angeles. I personally inspected this property in 2011 and surveyed the property again in 2021. The property has continued to deteriorate from 2011 until 2021, with no observable improvement or remediation. I have reviewed the photographs taken by the Code Enforcement Officers,Police Officers, and Fire Department Officials that are part of the City's file regarding this property. This file is kept in the normal course of City business. VIOLATIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE Based on a review of the aforementioned photographs of the property, and based on my experience, education and training, I can state they document the following violations: Exterior Property Area Violations (See Exhibits 1-4, 13-21,27-29,31-37, 39-40, 42-45, 48- 50 and 52) (a) Failure to maintain exterior property and premises in a clean, safe and sanitary condition. Section 302.1 of the 2015 International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) requires that the occupant shall keep that part of the exterior property that such occupant occupies or controls in a clean and sanitary condition. (b) Failure to maintain the property free from weeds or plant growth in excess of 12 inches. Section 302.4 of the IPMC states that noxious weeds shall be prohibited,where weeds are defined as all grasses, annual plants and vegetation, other than trees or shrubs provided; however, this term shall not include cultivated flowers and gardens. April 5, 2022 H - 23 (c) Evidence of the owner or others willfully or wantonly damaging,mutilating or defacing any exterior surface of any structure or building on any private or public property by placing thereon any marking, carving or graffiti, which is a violation of Section 302.9 of the IPMC. Exterior Structure Violations (See Exhibits 1-3, 5-7, 15-19,21,24-26,35,37,39-45, 47, 54- 58 and 60-62) Section 304.1 of the IPMC requires that the exterior of a structure must be maintained in good repair, structurally sound and sanitary so as not to pose a threat to the public health, safety or welfare. The following conditions were found to be in violation of Section 304.1.1 of the IMPC and they must be repaired or replaced to comply with the IPMC or the International Existing Building Code (IEBC) as required for existing buildings: (a) The nominal strength of any structural member is exceeded by nominal loads,the load effects or the required strength; (b) The anchorage of the floor or roof to walls or columns, and of walls and columns to foundations is not capable of resisting all nominal loads or load effects; (c) Structures or components thereof that have reached their limit state; (d) Siding and masonry joints including joints between the building envelope and the perimeter of windows, doors and skylights are not maintained, weather resistant or water tight; (e) Structural members that have evidence of deterioration or that are not capable of safely supporting all nominal loads and load effects; (f) Foundation systems that are not firmly supported by footings, are not plumb and free from open cracks and breaks, are not properly anchored or are not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; April 5, 2022 H - 24 (g) Exterior walls that are not anchored to supporting and supported elements or are not plumb and free of holes, cracks or breaks and loose or rotting materials, are not properly anchored or are not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; (h) Roofing or roofing components that have defects that admit rain, roof surfaces with inadequate drainage, or any portion of the roof framing that is not in good repair with signs of deterioration, fatigue or without proper anchorage and incapable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; (i) Flooring and flooring components with defects that affect serviceability or flooring components that show signs of deterioration or fatigue, are not properly anchored or are incapable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; 0) Veneer, cornices, belt courses, corbels, trim, wall facings and similar decorative features not properly anchored or that are anchored with connections not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; (k) Overhang extensions or projections including,but not limited to,trash chutes,canopies, marquees, signs, awnings, fire escapes, standpipes and exhaust ducts not properly anchored or that are anchored with connections not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; (1) Exterior stairs,decks,porches,balconies and all similar appurtenances attached thereto, including guards and handrails, are not structurally sound, not properly anchored or that are anchored with connections not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; and April 5, 2022 H - 25 (m) Chimneys, cooling towers, smokestacks and similar appurtenances not structurally sound or not properly anchored, or that are anchored with connections not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects. Protective Treatment Violations (See Exhibits 1-3, 5-7, 15-19,21,24-26,35,37,39-45,47, 55-57 and 60-62) Section 304.2 of the IPMC sets the standard for exterior protective treatment. The exterior surfaces of the subject building, including but not limited to, doors, door and window frames, cornices, porches, trim, balconies, decks and fences, are not maintained in good condition. The exterior wood surfaces, other than decay-resistant woods, are not protected from the elements and decay by painting or other protective covering or treatment. Peeling, flaking and chipped paint have not been eliminated and the surfaces repainted. Siding and masonry joints, as well as those between the building envelope and the perimeter of windows, doors and skylights, have not been maintained weather resistant and water tight. Metal surfaces subject to rust or corrosion have not been coated to inhibit such rust and corrosion, and surfaces with rust or corrosion have not been stabilized and coated to inhibit future rust and corrosion. Oxidation stains have not been removed from exterior surfaces. Surfaces designed for stabilization by oxidation are exempt from this requirement. Structural Members Violations (See Exhibits 1-3, 12-19, 21, 27-29, 31-32, 34-47, 49-52 and 61) The structural members of the building have not been maintained free from deterioration and due to their condition may not be capable of safely supporting the imposed dead and live loads, as required by Section 304.4 of the IPMC. April 5, 2022 H - 26 Foundation and Exterior Walls and Roofs and Drainage (See Exhibits 1-3, 17-19, 37, 40-47 and 61) (a) The foundation walls have not been be maintained plumb and free from open cracks and breaks and are in such condition so as to not prevent the entry of rodents and other pests, as required by Section 304.5 of the IPMC; (b) The exterior walls have not been maintained free from holes, breaks, and loose or rotting materials; and maintained weatherproof and properly surface coated where required to prevent deterioration, as required by Section 304.5 of the IPMC; (c) The following observed conditions have been determined to be a violation of IPMC 304.7: The roof and flashing have not been maintained so as to be sound,tight and not have defects that admit rain; Roof drainage is not adequate to prevent dampness or deterioration in the walls or interior portion of the structure; Roof drains, gutters and downspouts have not be maintained in good repair and free from obstructions; and Roof water has been allowed to be discharged in a manner that creates a public nuisance. Interior Structure Violations (See Exhibits 1-3, 12-19,21,27-29,31-32, 34-47,49-52 and 60) The following conditions have been determined to be a violation of IPMC Section 305.1: The interior of a structure and equipment therein have not been maintained in good repair, structurally sound and in a sanitary condition; and The occupants failed keep that part of the structure that they occupy or control in a clean and sanitary condition; The following conditions have been determined to exist and, as they have been deemed to be unsafe, must be repaired or replaced to bring the property into compliance with the IPMC or IEBC: April 5, 2022 H - 27 (a) The nominal strength of any structural member is exceeded by nominal loads,the load effects or the required strength; (b) The anchorage of the floor or roof to walls or columns, and of walls and columns to foundations is not capable of resisting all nominal loads or load effects; and (c) Structures or components thereof that have reached their limit state and the structural members are incapable of supporting nominal loads and load effects. Rubbish and Garbage Violations (See Exhibits 1, 12, 51, 55-60 and 62) The exterior property and premises, and the interior of every structure, have not been kept free from any accumulation of rubbish or garbage, as required by Section 308.1 of the IPMC. Based on my inspections of the property, and observations over the past year, I can state that the structure on the property has not been lawfully occupied for a period of one year or more. April 5, 2022 H - 28 REPORT OF KEN DUBUC I am employed as the Fire Chief for the City of Port Angeles. I have been the Fire Chief for 9 years. Prior to my appointment as Fire Chief, I was the City Fire Marshal for 12 years. As part of my job, I assist in the City's code compliance efforts. I am familiar with the City's longstanding efforts to induce Mr. Gladwin to clean up, secure, or repair his property located at 204 E. Front Street in the City of Port Angeles. On Saturday, March 26, 2022, at 21:52, the Port Angeles Fire Department responded to a reported structure fire in the building adjacent to Mathews Glass, located at 117 North Lincoln Street. Upon arrival, firefighters determined that the fire was located on the ground floor of the vacant building located at 204 East Front Street. The fire was quickly extinguished, and firefighters determined that there were no victims and no occupants in the building. Positive pressure ventilation was used to clear the building of smoke. I responded to the scene that night. I can tell you that as I was responding, I was listening to the radio traffic and I was physically shaking. I have responded to hundreds of fires throughout my career. Hundreds. This is my nightmare scenario. When I arrived on scene, I spoke briefly with Officer Johnson of PAPD. Officer Johnson had detained an adult female who was determined to have been the individual who started a warming fire inside the building. Officer Johnson related to me that a PAPD officer at the rear (south side) of the building had witnessed individuals "pouring" out of the south side, second floor exit of the building. At the time of the fire, I directed the PAFD officer in charge to board up the building as well as he could, as soon as he could. Within 30 minutes the building was boarded up with April 5, 2022 H - 29 plywood. PAPD personnel assisted and made sure that the structure was vacant before it was boarded up. I returned to the site on March 28 at approximately 10:45. The plywood along the Front Street side of the structure was in place and secure. The plywood over the second-floor entrance on the south side of the building had been ripped off. I entered through the second-floor door and carefully went in a few steps to take pictures, which are attached as Exhibits 69-75. It is absolutely clear that multiple persons are currently occupying this structure. The interior of the structure is littered with miscellaneous possessions, literally tons of garbage, feces and drug paraphernalia. There are at least four tents set up inside on the second floor. The combustible fire load inside this structure is absolutely terrifying. There are multiple holes in the floor. The masonry structure of the building is clearly crumbling in several locations. The entire south wall of the second floor appears to be propped up with wooden angle braces. Several masonry interior walls are breached. All the interior fire-resistive construction has been removed. All wooden structural elements are exposed. Any sizeable fire inside this structure will rapidly impinge upon the exposed wooden structural elements. This will certainly increase the likelihood of an entire structural collapse. The risk to any persons in or around the building at the time of collapse is obvious. The property located at 204 East Front Street has been a public safety concern for many years. The building is in obvious disrepair and is frequented by transients. I spoke with the owner of Mathews Glass, the structure directly to the west, and he stated that the adjacent building is "leaning" into his. When I was at the site on March 28, there were several individuals moving about inside the building. I watched as two persons exited the building April 5, 2022 H - 30 with their possessions on a cart. I asked these two persons if there were others still inside and they stated that there definitely were. It is not my intent to be dramatic. I am merely stating a professional opinion that is based upon 42 years of experience. That said, I believe that it would be immediately clear to any lay person that this is a literal disaster waiting to happen. Had the fire on March 26 grown in any appreciable way, it is extremely likely that there would have been multiple fatalities. Persons on the second floor would have been quickly overwhelmed by carbon monoxide and smoke before they were even aware of the fire below them. Again, this is a nightmare scenario. The Fire Department has responded to this location numerous times. There have been minimal attempts to secure the building, however every time personnel from the Fire Department access the building, they see obvious indications that it is being entered and used for shelter. There is no power to the building. It is almost certain that unless the building is adequately secured, transients occupying the structure will build warming or cooking fires inside. This has been the case in the past. This activity poses a significant hazard not only to the transients inside, but also to responding firefighters, police officers or even passers-by who might be inclined to act to try to assist someone trapped in the structure. The structural integrity of the building is certainly suspect. A fire of any consequence could easily result in a collapse of all or part of the building. Unless definitive corrective action is taken, it is entirely likely that someone will die in this structure. April 5, 2022 H - 31 REPORT OF MICHAEL SANDERS I am employed as the Fire Marshal for the City of Port Angeles. I have been the Fire Marshal for six years. As part of my job, I assist in the City's code compliance efforts. I am familiar with the City's longstanding efforts to induce Mr. Gladwin to clean up, secure, or repair his property located at 204 E. Front Street in the City of Port Angeles. I have personally inspected this property many times. VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE During my inspections of the property I have observed the following violations: An illegal accumulation of waste and vegetation,pursuant to International Fire Code(IFC) Sections 304.1, 304.1.1 and 304.1.2, in that combustible waste material creating a fire hazard shall not be allowed to accumulate in buildings or structures or upon premises (IFC 304.1); accumulations of wastepaper, wood, hay, straw, weeds, litter or combustible or flammable waste or rubbish of any type shall not be permitted to remain on a roof or in any court, yard, vacant lot, alley,parking lot, open space, or beneath a grandstand,bleacher,pier,wharf, manufactured home, recreational vehicle or other similar structure (IFC 304.1.1); and weeds, grass, vines or other growth that is capable of being ignited and endangering property, shall be cut down and removed by the owner or occupant of the premises (IFC 304.1.2). See Exhibits 48-50 and 64-68. Negligent charring (charring seen on combustible debris), pursuant to International Fire Code (IFC) Sections 304.1, 304.1.1 and 304.1.2, in that combustible waste material creating a fire hazard shall not be allowed to accumulate in buildings or structures or upon premises (IFC 304.1); accumulations of wastepaper, wood, hay, straw, weeds, litter or combustible or flammable waste or rubbish of any type shall not be permitted to remain on a roof or in any court, yard, vacant lot, alley,parking lot, open space, or beneath a grandstand,bleacher,pier,wharf, manufactured home, April 5, 2022 H - 32 recreational vehicle or other similar structure (IFC 304.1.1); and weeds, grass, vines or other growth that is capable of being ignited and endangering property, shall be cut down and removed by the owner or occupant of the premises (IFC 304.1.2). See Exhibits 48-50 and 64-68. An accumulation of combustible materials, flammable waste and rubbish (premises shall be clear of all waste and hazardous materials),pursuant to IFC Sections 311.1.1 and 311.3, in that buildings, structures and premises for which an owner cannot be identified or located by dispatch of a certificate of mailing to the last known or registered address, which persistently or repeatedly become unprotected or unsecured, which have been occupied by unauthorized persons or for illegal purposes, or which present a danger of structural collapse or fire spread to adjacent properties shall be considered to be abandoned, declared unsafe and abated by demolition or rehabilitation in accordance with the International Property Maintenance Code and the International Building Code(IFC 311.1.1); and persons owning,or in charge or control of,a vacant building or portion thereof, shall remove therefrom all accumulations of combustible materials, flammable or combustible waste or rubbish and shall securely lock or otherwise secure doors, windows and other openings to prevent entry by unauthorized persons and the premises shall be maintained clear of waste or hazardous materials (IFC 311.3). See Exhibits 51-52, 55-58, 60 and 64-68. Allowing unauthorized entry,pursuant to IFC Sections 311.1.1 and 311.3,in that buildings, structures and premises for which an owner cannot be identified or located by dispatch of a certificate of mailing to the last known or registered address, which persistently or repeatedly become unprotected or unsecured, which have been occupied by unauthorized persons or for illegal purposes, or which present a danger of structural collapse or fire spread to adjacent properties shall be considered to be abandoned, declared unsafe and abated by demolition or April 5, 2022 H - 33 rehabilitation in accordance with the International Property Maintenance Code and the International Building Code(IFC 311.1.1); and persons owning,or in charge or control of,a vacant building or portion thereof, shall remove therefrom all accumulations of combustible materials, flammable or combustible waste or rubbish and shall securely lock or otherwise secure doors, windows and other openings to prevent entry by unauthorized persons and the premises shall be maintained clear of waste or hazardous materials (IFC 311.3). See Exhibits 51-52 and 63. Allowing unsecured doors and windows to vacant/abandoned structure(windows observed open, back door forced open and not lockable, front door unlocked), pursuant to IFC Sections 111.1.1, 311.1, 311.2, and 311.2.1, in that structures or existing equipment that are or hereafter become unsafe or deficient because of inadequate means of egress, that constitute a fire hazard, are otherwise dangerous to human life or the public welfare, or involve illegal or improper occupancy or inadequate maintenance, shall be deemed an unsafe condition. A vacant structure that is not secured against unauthorized entry as required by Section 311 shall be deemed unsafe (IFC 111.1.1); buildings, structures and premises for which an owner cannot be identified or located by dispatch of a certificate of mailing to the last known or registered address, which persistently or repeatedly become unprotected or unsecured, which have been occupied by unauthorized persons or for illegal purposes, or which present a danger of structural collapse or fire spread to adjacent properties shall be considered to be abandoned, declared unsafe and abated by demolition or rehabilitation in accordance with the International Property Maintenance Code and the International Building Code (IFC 311.1.1); temporarily unoccupied buildings, structures, premises or portions thereof shall be secured and protected in accordance with Sections 311.2.1 through 311.2.3 (IFC 311.2); and exterior and interior openings open to other tenants or unauthorized persons shall be boarded, locked, blocked or otherwise protected to prevent entry by April 5, 2022 H - 34 unauthorized individuals and the fire code official is authorized to placard,post signs, erect barrier tape or take similar measures as necessary to secure public safety (IFC 311.2.1). See Exhibits 53, 60 and 63. April 5, 2022 H - 35 • PORT NGELES W A S H l N G T 0 N, U. S. A. 204 E. FRONT STREET REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL This Report to City Council was prepared by the Legal Department with the assistance of the Department of Commerce and Economic Development, Police Department and Fire Department. It is offered for informational purposes to allow City Council to determine if this property qualifies as a"blighted property." PROPERTY OWNER/PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR VIOLATIONS ("VIOLATOR"): David L. Gladwini PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS: 926 E. 81h Street Port Angeles, WA 98362 LOCATION OF VIOLATIONS: 204 E. Front St. Port Angeles, WA 98362 Parcel Number: 063000511710 Legal Description of Property: '"Person responsible for the violation" or"person responsible" means any person(s)required by the applicable regulation to comply therewith, or who commits any act or omission that is a violation or causes or permits a violation to occur or remain upon property in the city, and includes but is not limited to any owner(s), lessor(s), manager(s), agent(s), or other person(s) entitled to control, use and/or occupy property where a civil violation occurs. PAMC 2.90.020. 1 April 5, 2022 H - 36 LOT 8 BL 17 NORMAN R. SMTH SUBD. Introduction: On March 26, 2022 the Fire Department received a report of a fire at the building located at 204 E. Front Street. The Fire Department arrived and found a fire located on the ground floor of this building. The fire had been started as a"warming fire"inside the building, where a large number of unauthorized persons were gathered; Fire Department personnel extinguished the fire and noted substantial evidence that demonstrated large numbers of persons were residing in this building, which was not safe or healthy for occupancy. Following this fire, the Fire Department personnel observed the following conditions in the building's interior—the floor was littered with numerous miscellaneous possessions, copious amounts of garbage, human feces, drug paraphernalia, and at least four tents set up inside on the second floor. The building is made of brick, and the masonry structure of the building is clearly crumbling in several locations. The entire south wall of the second floor appears to be propped up with wooden angle braces, several masonry interior walls are breached; and all the interior fire-resistive construction has been removed resulting in all wooden structural elements being exposed. The property is currently in a state of complete disrepair in that the building is, dilapidated, unsafe, damaged, and in disrepair to the extent that it poses a threat of structural failure. See Exhibits 69-75. Following this fire, and based on the long-existing unacceptable conditions of this property as detailed below, the City Manager made a determination that Emergency Abatement action, as authorized by Chapter 2.90 (Compliance and Enforcement) of the Port Angeles Municipal Code (PAMC), is necessary regarding the real property located at 204 E. Front Street Chronology of Continuing Violation January 2011 City officials spoke to Mr. Gladwin on Friday January 14, 2011 regarding securing his property. The rear window (previously boarded up) had been broken into. The rear of the property is covered in graffiti and looks like part of a cover over the door has been torn off. It appears that 4x4 lumber was used to break in. Following a recheck on Monday January 18, 2011 it was determined that the property has not been secured. Mr. Gladwin was advised that the property needed to be maintained to the minimum standards set forth in the Port Angeles Municipal Code. The trash, 2 April 5, 2022 H - 37 debris, broken glass, old siding and roofing strewn about the property needed to be removed. The rear of the property needed to be maintained so it is not an attractive nuisance and an area for vagrants to congregate. Broken gutters needed to be removed or repaired. The leaking in the building needed to be repaired. In the future any graffiti needed to be covered within ten days of discovery or notification by the City. Mr. Gladwin complied with the City's requirements and it was resolved to the City's satisfaction by January 29, 2011. June-July 2011 Mr. Gladwin was again contacted by the City on June 23, 2011 and was told that all trash, debris and old appliances needed to be cleaned up and removed from the property. He was also told that the window on the south side of building must be secured within the next 24 hours and that the building must remain secure so it is not an attractive nuisance and gathering place for vagrants. He was again told that all graffiti must be removed or painted over and any graffiti must be removed within 10 days of notification. He was notified that all grass and weeds must be cut and maintained to 12" or less in height per the City Municipal Code. All branches must be trimmed back to keep the area from being used as a place for vagrants to gather. He was also told that the needed to secure the building within 24 hours of the Notice he received. Mr. Gladwin complied with the City's requirements and it was resolved to the City's satisfaction by July 26, 2011. March 2012-August 2013 Several attempts have been made in the past to get Mr. Gladwin to maintain this property to the minimum standards in the PAMC. The structure was discovered once again to be unsecured, covered in graffiti, with possible structural damage caused by water infiltration. The property was coved with trash and debris. It had broken glass and the rear doors were torn off. Plywood securing the rear windows was also torn off. Water was infiltrating the structure and may have caused a large crack in the side wall. The structure should be inspected to determine if it is structurally safe. The City attempted to contact Mr. Gladwin by phone several times, leaving messages about securing the building and did not receive a timely a return call. As of April 13, 2012, the glass in one of the Front Street doors had been broken out. Another message was left for Mr. Gladwin informing him of this and asking that he return the City's call. Mr. Gladwin eventually called and said he would 3 April 5, 2022 H - 38 secure the building. His intent is to get the building cleaned up to sell. His plan is to sell the property that summer. He was aware that an inspection would happen on April 17, 2012 to make sure the building has been secured. He stated he would design a work plan that was acceptable to the city. The City received another call from Mr. Gladwin on May 11, 2012. He indicated that he would be continuing to work on the property on the weekend cleaning it up to sell. Mr. Gladwin eventually complied with the City's requirements and it was resolved to the City's satisfaction by August 19, 2013. November 2013-June 2017 On November 18, 2013 graffiti was observed on the east and south walls. The property was strewn with trash and debris. There was a significant amount of overgrown vegetation seen. On May 27, 2015 an inspection revealed an open, vacant, unsanitary, and unsafe building. Tall weeds and grass were observed, along with graffiti. The property was deemed to be an attractive nuisance. The City posted structure for no occupancy. On May 28, 2015 the City spoke with the owner. He said he would be in town next weekend to secure the door, clean up, mow the grass, and paint over the graffiti. Mr. Gladwin eventually complied with the City's requirements and it was resolved to the City's satisfaction by June 21, 2017. January 2021-June 2021 At approximately 9:15 a.m. on the morning of January 21, 2021 Code Enforcement Officers Brown and Buchanan conducted a visual inspection of the property located at 204 E. Front St. as the result of citizen and City employee complaints. Officer Brown took several photographs of the north side of the building on Front Street. The front door of the building was not secure, and the door had broken glass from forced entry. The building is currently without power. A large amount of refuse could be observed through the windows, and evidence of trespass was visible in the building as a new tent was pitched inside the structure. There was a large amount of garbage visible through the windows that included drug 4 April 5, 2022 H - 39 paraphernalia that could pose a health and safety hazard to anyone who should have to enter the building. The second story windows were in disrepair and breaking out of the frames. Pieces of glass have already fallen to the street requiring City staff to close off an area to protect pedestrian traffic. Makeshift covers have been put up to block visibility of the interior of the second floor. The backside of the lot had evidence of entry into the second floor of the building via holes in the siding and an unsecured door that appeared to have been kicked in. The back wall of the second floor appears to be in poor condition and at risk of collapse. Refuse was present on the extent of the lot underneath the powerlines. The wood fagade on the back of the building was rotten and sliding off the building. There appeared to be fire damage extending into the building's second floor. There was a large amount of debris as well as a burnt retaining wall present in the back portion of the lot. Officers Brown and Buchanan determined that several code violations are present and would follow up with attempt to contact the property owner to secure the premise. (See Exhibits 4-47.) On January 21, 2021Officers Brown and Buchanan attempted to contact the owner of 204 E. Front Street at his residence and were unsuccessful. Officer Brown followed up with a phone call on January 25, 2021 with no answer. The owner was left a message to contact her as soon as possible regarding the property at 204 E. Front Street. Mr. Gladwin secured the property in late January 2021. June 2021 Fire Marshal Sanders inspected the property on June 14, 2021. He found numerous Fire Code violations and posted"No Occupancy" signs on the building. His inspections also revealed that there had been no improvements over the conditions observed by Officers Brown and Buchanan in January 2021. (See Exhibits 1-3.) September 2021 Despite repeated promises by the owner that the building would be secured the building is not secured from the north, south or roof. No occupancy signs are still visible and posted on the building. The building is clearly being occupied and is a health and structural hazard. On September 22, 2021 in responding to a call for assistance the Port Angeles Fire Department discovered an unconscious male inside the building. Along with the Port Angeles Police Department, the 5 April 5, 2022 H - 40 responding units were able to awake the man and found another person living inside—both were told to vacate. With the cold weather coming, the Fire Department is concerned about increased occupancy and risk of fire. Violations The following conditions, which constitute violations of the Port Angeles Municipal Code have been observed and documented by the Port Angeles Code Enforcement Officer, the Port Angeles Fire Marshal and the Port Angeles Building Inspector: The Code Enforcement Officer observed: i. Allowing overgrown, uncultivated, or unkempt vegetation of any type, including, but not limited to, shrubs, brush, trees, weeds, blackberries, and grasses over one foot in height(PAMC 8.30.060.A.2); allowing vegetation exceeding 12 inches in height, excluding any cultivated, tended plants and flowers within a flower bed or container, shrubbery, or trees (PAMC 8.30.060.A.2); allowing dead, decaying or diseased trees or branches (PAMC 8.30.060.A.3); and allowing growth of noxious weeds or any toxic vegetation (PAMC 8.30.060.A.4). See Exhibits 13-16, 19-20, 27-34 and 50.; ii. Allowing an accumulation of garbage, litter, debris, rubble, hazardous waste, or blight, which includes, but is not limited to, improperly stored bottles, cans,paper, glass,plastic, cardboard, auto parts, tires, scrap metal, scrap woods, discarded or broken appliances, furniture, equipment, bicycles or parts thereof, barrels, boxes, crates,pallets, mattresses, clothing, household goods, construction materials, lumber, metal, improperly piled or stored firewood, or anything in which flies may breed or multiply, which provides harborage for rats or other vermin, or which may be a fire hazard (PAMC 8.30.060.C.3); and allowing accumulations of broken or neglected items, litter, salvage materials, and junk not in an approved enclosed structure (PAC 8.30.060.C.2). See Exhibits 1-2, 13-21, 28-29, 31-37, 39-40, 42-45, 47-50 and 52.; iii. Allowing the presence of any unsightly, abandoned, or deteriorated building or structure; or any building or structure constructed with inappropriate materials, or improperly fastened together or anchored against the forces of nature (PAMC 8.30.060.B.2); and allowing buildings, structures, fences or other constructed objects that are decayed, dilapidated, or unsafe, damaged, or in disrepair to the extent that they pose a threat of collapse, structural failure, or falling (PAMC 8.30.060.B.1). See Exhibits 1-3, 5-6, 10, 15-21, 32, 35-47, 48-50, 52, 55-57 and 61-62.; 6 April 5, 2022 H - 41 iv. Permitting the existence of any premises or structures allowing or maintaining prostitution, lewd behavior, underage consumption of alcohol, the harboring of juvenile runaways or wanted persons, or where there is the use, sale, manufacturing or distributing of any narcotic or controlled substance, or at which there is a pattern of criminal activity. (PAMC 8.30.060.B.6). See Exhibits 8-9, 11-12, 17, 19, 21, 44, 51 and 52.; V. Throwing, depositing, exposing, or causing to be disposed of, in any street or other public place within the City, any garbage, waste, refuse, litter, debris, or other offensive material, unless the disposal of such items in such place is specifically authorized by law. (PAMC 8.30.060.C.3). See Exhibits 5-6. vi. Allowing any vacant, unused, or unoccupied buildings and structures within the City, to become or remain open to entrance by unauthorized persons or the general public, because of broken, missing, or open doors, windows, or other openings, so that the same may be used by vagrants or other persons, in a manner detrimental to the health and welfare of the inhabitants of the City. (PAMC 8.060.13.6) See Exhibits 1-2, 8-12, 15-18, 21-22, 24, 29, 31-32, 38- 45, 47, 51, 52, 54, and 60.; vii. Allowing stacks or accumulations of newspapers, cardboard, or other paper, clothing, or wood products left in a manner that could pose a substantial risk of combustion or the spread of fire. (PAMC 8.30.060.C.3). See Exhibits 1-2, 16-19, 21, 42, 44-45, 47, 49, 55-59 and 62.; viii. Allowing an accumulation of garbage not kept in a proper receptacle with a tight-fitting lid. (PAMC 8.060.C.3). See Exhibits 1-2, 15-21, 29-29, 31-37, 39-40, 42-45, 47-50, 55-59 and 62.; The Fire Marshal observed: ix. Illegal accumulation of waste and vegetation,pursuant to International Fire Code (IFC) Sections 304.1, 304.1.1 and 304.1.2, in that combustible waste material creating a fire hazard shall not be allowed to accumulate in buildings or structures or upon premises (IFC 304.1); accumulations of wastepaper, wood, hay, straw, weeds, litter or combustible or flammable waste or rubbish of any type shall not be permitted to remain on a roof or in any court, yard, vacant lot, alley,parking lot, open space, or beneath a grandstand,bleacher,pier, wharf, manufactured home, recreational vehicle or other similar structure (IFC 304.1.1); and weeds, grass, vines or other growth that is capable of being ignited and endangering property, shall be cut down and removed by the owner or occupant of the premises (IFC 304.1.2). See Exhibits 48-50 and 64-68. 7 April 5, 2022 H - 42 X. Negligent charring (charring seen on combustible debris), pursuant to International Fire Code (IFC) Sections 304.1, 304.1.1 and 304.1.2, in that combustible waste material creating a fire hazard shall not be allowed to accumulate in buildings or structures or upon premises (IFC 304.1); accumulations of wastepaper, wood, hay, straw, weeds, litter or combustible or flammable waste or rubbish of any type shall not be permitted to remain on a roof or in any court, yard, vacant lot, alley,parking lot, open space, or beneath a grandstand,bleacher,pier, wharf, manufactured home, recreational vehicle or other similar structure (IFC 304.1.1); and weeds, grass, vines or other growth that is capable of being ignited and endangering property, shall be cut down and removed by the owner or occupant of the premises (IFC 304.1.2). See Exhibits 48-50 and 64-68. xi. Accumulation of combustible materials, flammable waste and rubbish (premises shall be clear of all waste and hazardous materials),pursuant to IFC Sections 311.1.1 and 311.3, in that buildings, structures and premises for which an owner cannot be identified or located by dispatch of a certificate of mailing to the last known or registered address,which persistently or repeatedly become unprotected or unsecured, which have been occupied by unauthorized persons or for illegal purposes, or which present a danger of structural collapse or fire spread to adjacent properties shall be considered to be abandoned, declared unsafe and abated by demolition or rehabilitation in accordance with the International Property Maintenance Code and the International Building Code (IFC 311.1.1); and persons owning, or in charge or control of, a vacant building or portion thereof, shall remove therefrom all accumulations of combustible materials, flammable or combustible waste or rubbish and shall securely lock or otherwise secure doors, windows and other openings to prevent entry by unauthorized persons and thepremises shall be maintained clear of waste or hazardous materials (IFC 311.3). See Exhibits 51-52, 55-58 and 60.; xii. Allowing unauthorized entry,pursuant to IFC Sections 311.1.1 and 311.3, in that buildings, structures and premises for which an owner cannot be identified or located by dispatch of a certificate of mailing to the last known or registered address,which persistently or repeatedly become unprotected or unsecured, which have been occupied by unauthorized persons or for illegal purposes, or which present a danger of structural collapse or fire spread to adjacent properties shall be considered to be abandoned, declared unsafe and abated by demolition or rehabilitation in accordance with the International Property Maintenance Code and the International Building Code (IFC 311.1.1); and persons owning, or in charge or control of, a vacant building or portion thereof, shall remove therefrom all accumulations of combustible materials, flammable or combustible waste or rubbish and shall securely lock or otherwise secure doors, 8 April 5, 2022 H - 43 windows and other openings to prevent entry by unauthorized persons and the premises shall be maintained clear of waste or hazardous materials (IFC 311.3). See Exhibits 51-52 and 63. xiii. Allowing unsecured doors and windows to vacant/abandoned structure (windows observed open, back door forced open and not lockable, front door unlocked),pursuant to IFC Sections 111.1.1, 311.1, 311.2, and 311.2.1, in that structures or existing equipment that are or hereafter become unsafe or deficient because of inadequate means of egress, that constitute a fire hazard, are otherwise dangerous to human life or the public welfare, or involve illegal or improper occupancy or inadequate maintenance, shall be deemed an unsafe condition. A vacant structure that is not secured against unauthorized entry as required by Section 311 shall be deemed unsafe (IFC 111.1.1); buildings, structures and premises for which an owner cannot be identified or located by dispatch of a certificate of mailing to the last known or registered address, which persistently or repeatedly become unprotected or unsecured, which have been occupied by unauthorized persons or for illegal purposes, or which present a danger of structural collapse or fire spread to adjacent properties shall be considered to be abandoned, declared unsafe and abated by demolition or rehabilitation in accordance with the International Property Maintenance Code and the International Building Code (IFC 311.1.1); temporarily unoccupied buildings, structures,premises or portions thereof shall be secured and protected in accordance with Sections 311.2.1 through 311.2.3 (IFC 311.2); and exterior and interior openings open to other tenants or unauthorized persons shall be boarded, locked, blocked or otherwise protected to prevent entry by unauthorized individuals and the fire code official is authorized to placard,post signs, erect barrier tape or take similar measures as necessary to secure public safety (IFC 311.2.1). See Exhibits 53, 60 and 63. The Building Inspector observed: Exterior Property Area Violations (See Exhibits 1-4, 13-21, 27-29, 31-37, 39-40, 42-45, 48-50 and 52): xiv. (a) Failure to maintain exterior property and premises in a clean, safe and sanitary condition. Section 302.1 of the 2015 International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC)requires that the occupant shall keep that part of the exterior property that such occupant occupies or controls in a clean and sanitary condition. (b) Failure to maintain the property free from weeds or plant growth in excess of 12 inches. Section 302.4 of the IPMC states that noxious weeds shall be prohibited, where weeds are defined as all grasses, annual plants 9 April 5, 2022 H - 44 and vegetation, other than trees or shrubs provided; however, this term shall not include cultivated flowers and gardens. (c) Evidence of the owner or others willfully or wantonly damaging, mutilating or defacing any exterior surface of any structure or building on any private or public property by placing thereon any marking, carving or graffiti, which is a violation of Section 302.9 of the IPMC. Exterior Structure Violations (See Exhibits 1-3, 5-7, 15-19, 21, 24-26, 35, 37, 39- 45, 47, 54-58 and 60-62) xv. Section 3 04.1 of the IPMC requires that the exterior of a structure must be maintained in good repair, structurally sound and sanitary so as not to pose a threat to the public health, safety or welfare. The following conditions were found to be in violation of Section 304.1.1 of the IMPC and they must be repaired or replaced to comply with the IPMC or the International Existing Building Code (IEBC) as required for existing buildings: (a) The nominal strength of any structural member is exceeded by nominal loads, the load effects or the required strength; (b) The anchorage of the floor or roof to walls or columns, and of walls and columns to foundations is not capable of resisting all nominal loads or load effects; (c) Structures or components thereof that have reached their limit state; (d) Siding and masonry joints including joints between the building envelope and the perimeter of windows, doors and skylights are not maintained, weather resistant or water tight; (e) Structural members that have evidence of deterioration or that are not capable of safely supporting all nominal loads and load effects; (f) Foundation systems that are not firmly supported by footings, are not plumb and free from open cracks and breaks, are not properly anchored or are not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; (g) Exterior walls that are not anchored to supporting and supported elements or are not plumb and free of holes, cracks or breaks and loose or rotting materials, are not properly anchored or are not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; 10 April 5, 2022 H - 45 (h) Roofing or roofing components that have defects that admit rain, roof surfaces with inadequate drainage, or any portion of the roof framing that is not in good repair with signs of deterioration, fatigue or without proper anchorage and incapable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; (i) Flooring and flooring components with defects that affect serviceability or flooring components that show signs of deterioration or fatigue, are not properly anchored or are incapable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; 0) Veneer, cornices, belt courses, corbels, trim, wall facings and similar decorative features not properly anchored or that are anchored with connections not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; (k) Overhang extensions or projections including, but not limited to, trash chutes, canopies, marquees, signs, awnings, fire escapes, standpipes and exhaust ducts not properly anchored or that are anchored with connections not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; (1) Exterior stairs, decks, porches, balconies and all similar appurtenances attached thereto, including guards and handrails, are not structurally sound, not properly anchored or that are anchored with connections not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects; and (m) Chimneys, cooling towers, smokestacks and similar appurtenances not structurally sound or not properly anchored, or that are anchored with connections not capable of supporting all nominal loads and resisting all load effects. Protective Treatment Violations (See Exhibits 1-3, 5-7, 15-19, 21, 24-26, 35, 37, 39-45, 47, 55-57 and 60-62) xvi. Section 304.2 of the IPMC sets the standard for exterior protective treatment. The exterior surfaces of the subject building, including but not limited to, doors, door and window frames, cornices,porches, trim, balconies, decks and fences, are not maintained in good condition. The exterior wood surfaces, other than decay-resistant woods, are not protected from the elements and decay by painting or other protective covering or treatment. Peeling, flaking and chipped paint have not been eliminated and the surfaces repainted. Siding and masonry joints, as well as those between the building envelope and the perimeter of 11 April 5, 2022 H - 46 windows, doors and skylights, have not been maintained weather resistant and water tight. Metal surfaces subject to rust or corrosion have not been coated to inhibit such rust and corrosion, and surfaces with rust or corrosion have not been stabilized and coated to inhibit future rust and corrosion. Oxidation stains have not been removed from exterior surfaces. Surfaces designed for stabilization by oxidation are exempt from this requirement. Structural Members Violations (See Exhibits 1-3, 12-19, 21, 27-29, 31-32, 34-47, 49-52 and 61) xvii. The structural members of the building have not been maintained free from deterioration and due to their condition may not be capable of safely supporting the imposed dead and live loads, as required by Section 304.4 of the IPMC. Foundation and Exterior Walls and Roofs and Drainage (See Exhibits 1-3, 17-19, 37, 40-47 and 61) xviii. (a) The foundation walls have not been be maintained plumb and free from open cracks and breaks and are in such condition so as to not prevent the entry of rodents and other pests, as required by Section 304.5 of the IPMC; (b) The exterior walls have not been maintained free from holes, breaks, and loose or rotting materials; and maintained weatherproof and properly surface coated where required to prevent deterioration, as required by Section 304.5 of the IPMC; (c) The following observed conditions have been determined to be a violation of IPMC 304.7: The roof and flashing have not been maintained so as to be sound, tight and not have defects that admit rain; Roof drainage is not adequate to prevent dampness or deterioration in the walls or interior portion of the structure; Roof drains, gutters and downspouts have not be maintained in good repair and free from obstructions; and Roof water has been allowed to be discharged in a manner that creates a public nuisance. Interior Structure Violations (See Exhibits 1-3, 12-19, 21, 27-29, 31-32, 34-47, 49-52 and 60) xix. The following conditions have been determined to be a violation of IPMC Section 305.1: The interior of a structure and equipment therein have not been maintained in good repair, structurally sound and in a sanitary condition; and 12 April 5, 2022 H - 47 The occupants failed keep that part of the structure that they occupy or control in a clean and sanitary condition; xx. The following conditions have been determined to exist and, as they have been deemed to be unsafe, must be repaired or replaced to bring the property into compliance with the IPMC or IEBC: (a) The nominal strength of any structural member is exceeded by nominal loads, the load effects or the required strength; (b) The anchorage of the floor or roof to walls or columns, and of walls and columns to foundations is not capable of resisting all nominal loads or load effects; and (c) Structures or components thereof that have reached their limit state and the structural members are incapable of supporting nominal loads and load effects. Rubbish and Garbage Violations (See Exhibits 1, 12, 51, 55-60 and 62) xxi. The exterior property and premises, and the interior of every structure, have not been kept free from any accumulation of rubbish or garbage, as required by Section 308.1 of the IPMC. City Attorney William E. Bloor Attachments: Exhibits 1-62. 13 April 5, 2022 H - 48 ! � ` �;. - � , �� „ �� .. f r`r �� ' � es ��k� �s �1 � �� v ,�, �� ,`''- �, a �, �,Y �. �r� �;�:� ��' '`� ^��. � �s� � �� ._ i `� � sir 4 � � ,,� y � ✓/ �! �, ��' ,. �, n .�' i � �� '�: y `. � �..� �, � �i�` �) ! 7 � `I T ��; V�i��:, `i�� n �°�� '� � �P.� �� i �' � /. � .� � .1 � � :� � � 4 � �'d �, r ?, � �" it •� �.. "�`Vyv ` 3� ^ i; K lRv. + �y a fi x j I i �� ryfi r 6 i 'I r f r k b' I I Exhibit 3 April 5, 2022 H - 51 ..�. �Ir � 1 S {� ��t�� . �.li, t.� r �.\ I �� s :� � 'y�� F ',� � � s, � r�� ` � � � �� ` � � i, 1 �� ; '1 � ':� f i•� ,,. r ��. I , ��j\ �� '�{� �.�• �A �\-�� '� r � � � \� ��; �/�� r �; w-- �" �; � '� � � 2�� T � ��` �. I 3� 1 1 1 �I 't4a \ � I � Y �..' � \ `A ` �. � r\, 1,,. � � �� 1 , � 1 Owl�t �j 41 1 � �,�� Y��► . Wit '. �id°� r:+�.�„ a u d 7 � � . 1 W 1 ig t S !+ r j .� 1. '. v 11, r141. kA n li , .Y✓k i q - b _ S I April 5, 2022 - a z a d � j Exhibit 8 \ « Exhibit 9 April 5, 2022 N . 57 r I ..°` 77, idw"�i Exhibit 10 April 5, 2022 H - 58 %w : Exhibit I April 5, 2022 H - 59 r , �q II E_ s Y` w F jM1 ti 4l� Exhibit 12 April 5, 2022 H - 60 MN^ w, 21 Zy . iAa •• y u . - ��e+vti, � P �l p r � r �rvf fr I i, .f r. k� R r t S ! I t� i, 1 y I4 w� Exhibit OPP- April 1 66 ello �. ".• Y �"r IV �''V �- ,LI�'rW'd a �� ?/ „tr+N�'' !y^ •f/f��H�i'-r �� "� err'•`{ ��,'' �".'. � } ,� .'s �, �"�. .�r:�lr� ,� tg 777 C .. sd'v w �• .i wf a ^!= .4,• r 1 1 r> � 4P .j JV � � r a / f b ✓ � I` �1' a a Exhibit 20 April 5, 2022 H - 68 I � I a � tAll, WO� r'. [WO y; ��"r• , �,.��"�. `ia►�. "ark P Id ' II DANGER �M1 me 1 j Exhibit 22 April 5, 2022 H - 70 l "it eig 93 ry� - 'LL Nr1" - n - i ✓ , r — _ i fll � la_ p ��s.�*��'�'l,✓��"��9��v �� a ,� ^! ,� -'�, Syr r��. �r�7 �s�✓.�m�� 'f��'��""v 4' sib✓'p1��'u � " , Exhibit 23 April 5, 2022 H - 71 ,ail i 04, do { fi , i I , i r � a, q y 4 1 _ a ;a= k � a Exhibit 25 April 5, 2022 H - 73 Y e` 0 1 \ � (4v11111�1 All f �I JT . V� Exhibit 26 April 5, 2022 H - 74 1 -'o-�"•�-- At gt �' i r��" p �q �� d � n e � ✓ � ..� �, 6f�'F,1ni ��-' .°,m��l i L` ,� �� AQ? .��.�3;p�4�! 1 Y 'n. .� 5YT'P' •1Vo III - n, /M ^.�c'�.^' �„"� � fi rE a i`�$,a•�`�a KAMM r "a•. z ' �. P _ 1 iY� i�7�v J` a s a ,� IA .t�� Gai Exhibit 27 April 5, 2022 H - 75 i I f�' �Q a✓� fir_y/"'��ry�`A P .. +r✓.nnp�� r�`/ya� �a ��l V>�F Y,�i r4{'r � "Fr x f J t\ �k. w flklr >M � �a � Ak 11 r� �,�i 1��Idiji'rs��i J� '(I ,1•n. y R �}G �d�,"'•�� I' � 1 �� C,� q � tom. �}. `� _ •' ffffj LL � > i s rM c 2. Exhibit 29 April 5, 2022 H - 77 �� mJ 11 �{�+--�u`�i �.�� '► � m JO •i '€ 1I�.VVVV �., . 1 IA Ak 7t n�rvq' n Exhibit 30 April 5, 2022 H - 78 r ',f -A 441 i `� �f "� E 4✓fir�a ''°�., r �g74 t, l � ,. Akf �h 0 fin" Exhibit 31 April 5, 2022 H - 79 f � p. k _ l ARIN 4 o AP W, a I Exhibit 32 April 5, 2022 H - 80 4; Ali- �= � 1 14, �l I I ic tJ i J• ma`s.` � s 'G ` +`•a�.r"A)+."L� �� t.,i++ .�" � �I F3 l rt NR Exhibit 34 April 5, 2022 H - 82 h ,, ` _ � �� _._ .P r i ,� - ' �` ! _-_- N - __ i _ _ � . -_ _ � ..-._m. � �ji �, � L�� Y- -f �. I �yfl � � � . uy all _ , .�_:r�E-f. ,. � � ,�' , t , , ,�,k� i �_ ,, - .. � ��- .�'..,, ` � i, .� � r �� ._�. � � ,,��,. ,..-- _'. �. .. -_ � -__`__ " t � A�r� �� , � �p Y ��. `" �,`.��t�z�`'�� ,� � `t, � /��, �,.R fir\: � `��I 1 _� ! A � ' 1. � .�� ;. „�,� ti ,� f w `� ri`"4'� � �T�f'�'� �� Y> "�1�Y �+ �v� I/4�`T� �`' °`. eJ ti r��° f` 4�1�� 1 � 1 a. I _ AJ + p� 49, Exhibit 36 } April 1 F1� 4 `C W `l9a 1. � I* ri April 5, 2022 W � x Y k kl 44 Jr :. e INC - -,_ Exhibit 38 April 5, 2022 H - 86 i A 1 r., S • r �' 1 5 r _ a OW e r r i k rj� o, Exhibit 39 April 5, 2022 H - 87 r owl v 461 MIL Exhibit 40 April 5, 2022 H - 88 1 FF •' 7 r !q p! v I pl 4� r a. i Exhibit 41 April 5, 2022 H - 89 i - r 9/ � 1 i asp€""� Y`�s.,� �o`:. ��„p�,��d` ',�y,,..�� _�` ,. sd9✓• F Exhibit 42 April 5, 2022 H - 90 I , F 1 i i ;� Jf t o \ 4 M f ^^ i z � j Exhibit 43 April 5, 2022 H - 91 1 t� � r 7 a N, 'A 1'"�1 t J ♦.. f � � F Z. by J � i Exhibit 44 April 5, 2022 H - 92 J r v � I r I�' � t I •�° �� .fr �- 01 01 Exhibit 45 April 5, 2022 H - 93 v I f l f 01 ; f� I r l K C . esy Exhibit 46 April 5, 2022 H - 94 .-,- t r ., ALL Ilk a' a `!Jre •' r *� J k Exhibit 47 April 5, 2022 H - 95 Feu--�- Exhibit • April 5, 2022 ..wry h•.. f ��.$ 1�'�� R Fes- �� • � mom. _ - � -.ems.,,_..� 'e'4 } � .; —x 4`�S';d�.'• Y ram.• ; -, ��r.. _ - .. j' A r x. e e 97 III III - • S d t A Exhibit 51 April 5, 2022 H - 99 �. : . § g OP" ` / . - .e� ^ ` ^ � \ , S iiv } \ ` � Exhibit 52 April 5, 2022 N . 100 M i w Exhibit 53 April 5, 2022 H - 101 a f" � Q t. t 4 ti A r 103 r E �. e VEM Exhibit 57 April 5, 2022 H - 105 w 4, y - 5 � 7F l PER jr- AA Exhibit 58 April 5, 2022 H - 106 ,r Exhibit • r k kj 1 Exhibit 60 April 5, 2022 H - 108 I I � A� f r� s a _ A� a Exhibit 61 April 5, 2022 H - 109 f I 17 ^ 4 l r7 Jam..�.••�k� ��/..� ...A_Mf1 �hk,IL �" � �~� ."� ..��'i Exhibit 62 April 5, 2022 H - 110 l l� fir'.' f ', � k+� �•. _+� � i Exhibit 64 April 5, 2022 H - 112 � t IV fS� Exhibit April 5, 2022 Y y. Exhibit • April 5, 2022 } r ra p + i i ti I li'�Sr hon " Exhibit 68 April 5, 2022 H - 116 NM a f i„ .� A , � /� �ICWY..� '� � !lC(I i� y/"�iGl'$ f S(� � 7 §,i ,: .��e y,a''. W� � cti, 1 � �� 92 ._ �� ,�I � r � ��`��sa/' 4' ./ rrll+fI s ItY ( II � � r. f � d� 'F�' r�° r ry '. f Y. � � ��- >y '�� ,� t �� i � e`� �� ; „� �� y �� ' '�� .a ��ti � . -� � t .�. �; �!�� .� �Vp, '3a.o,. �, i ,� .� � _. U r �� « f ,� � J= c1; .�� z�. .4= � '>' "` � � - „�� ..." � 1 / � � 1 i I I . a I t w ; i �hdd� r mor -.Adak. w « � n - pA :. ht.l o + - Exhibit 72 April 5, 2022 H - 120 1 ` 7• �[1 Y+ tt�p i Wyk ��f IiA •f•. ��t�'��il��, �ypC'f SI�i Y � �gx t '�••� � z ` m 5 � a ,i� • ��° vim... _ stilt .,may. 1/ mil♦ � �`�`'� r I� ./ �� I a - P'• ,; �rw ffii.�� ;of�-�� .<.'a ,� fA7 _. ' .lam ,,r►�k�P fj?Yli `�� ..f! c.' ,/� .,�r \ ��' Si•>sly�. H E • R by ,��•�. n � 1 ! wow RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Port Angeles, Washington, approving a 5.5%increase to the salary schedule effective January 1, 2022 for the City's non-represented management and administrative personnel. WHEREAS, the City previously established a uniform package of salaries, wages and benefits for its non-represented management and administrative employees; and WHEREAS, the salaries, wages, and benefits for this group of employees should be amended periodically to ensure that compensation for this group of employees is adequate to attract and retain highly competent employees and is competitive with similar positions in comparable cities; and WHEREAS, for 2022, to preserve uniformity for the non-represented employees, it is necessary to adjust the salary schedules by 5.5% effective in January 1, 2022; and WHEREAS, the holiday schedule for all employees needs to be amended to include the Juneteenth holiday; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles Washington. THAT for the management, administrative and non-represented employees of the City a 5.5% COLA is hereby authorized and approved for 2022, with COLA adjustments to be included in the budgets for 2023 and 2024 consistent with the adjustments agreed upon for the AFSCME union. And THAT June 191h is recognized as Juneteenth and added to the employees' holidays. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Port Angeles at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of 2022. -1- April 5, 2022 H - 124 Kate Dexter, Mayor ATTEST: By: Kari Martinez-Bailey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: William E. Bloor, City Attorney -2- April 5, 2022 H - 125 tfM POR-T-ANGELES CITY COUNCIL WASH I N G T o N , u , s , MEMO Date: Apri15,2022 To: City Council From: Nathan West, City Manager Subject: 2022 Cost of Living Adjustment(COLA) for Management,Administrative and Non- Represented Personnel Summary: The salaries and wages for the management, administrative and non-represented employees are generally adjusted to reflect a Cost of Living Adjustment(COLA)in line with the City's represented employees. The attached Resolution implements such an adjustment. Funding: The cost will require a$162,900 adjustment to the 2022 budget. Of that amount, approximately $46,300 will impact utilities directly while the rest of the costs will be charged to the General Fund and may be reallocated to other funds according to the budgetary allocation methodology as appropriate. Recommendation: Pass Resolution approving a 5.5% increase to the salary schedule effective January 1,2022 for the City's non-represented management and administrative personnel. Background / Analysis: In recent months,the City has successfully negotiated agreements with three of it' s five unions. Each contract agreed to a three-year term with a COLA for each year.Most were consistent with the All-Cities Consumer Price Index(CPI) for June to June. "Management, administrative and non-represented personnel"consist of employees,in all departments, not covered by a collective bargaining agreement including administrative personnel,mid-management, department directors and the City Manager. Recognizing that these staff members do not have a union representative negotiating on their behalf,the City historically adjusts wages consistently with the represented employee groups to encourage equity and fairness between all personnel groups employed by the City. Each job class in the City has a designated pay range. As union represented staff receive COLA's and/or wage adjustments,the ratio between staff and management pay compresses. In order to encourage internal promotions,the City must maintain a wage spread between staff and management positions that is commensurate with the duties and responsibilities of the positions.The City continues to experience recruitment challenges for non-represented positions. Recognizing that,it is crucial to maintain wages that are sufficient to attract high quality,competent employees and that are competitive with other municipalities and like-work in our region as well as other Washington Cities comparable to Port Angeles. Additionally,it is critically important to ensure that positions are filled timely to advance City and Council priorities and prevent staffing capacity issues. The attached Resolution includes a 5.5% COLA effective January 1,2022,the addition of the Juneteenth holiday,plus an equivalent COLA and wage adjustment,to be included in the budget for 2023 and 2024, April 5, 2022 H - 126 for the management, administrative and non-represented personnel which is consistent with what was agreed upon for the AFSCME union. Funding Overview: The cost will require a$162,900 adjustment to the 2022 budget. Of that amount, approximately $46,300 will impact utilities directly while the rest of the costs will be charged to the General Fund and may be reallocated to other funds according to the budgetary allocation methodology as appropriate. April 5, 2022 H - 127 tfM POR-T-ANGELES CITY COUNCIL WASH I N G T o N , u , s , MEMO Date: Apri15,2022 To: City Council From: Emma Bolin,Interim Director of Community and Economic Development Subject: GreenLink Port Angeles Presentation on Phase I and Phase II Valley Creek Daylight Feasibility Assessment and Valley Creek Master Plan Summary: Susannah Spock of Futurewise will present the results of Phase I project to prioritize multi- benefit green stormwater infrastructure (GSI)projects.Phase I developed a prioritized list of integrated GSI projects and policy recommendations utilizing heat mapping and input from public outreach and the GreenLink Advisory Committee. Susannah will describe the highest ranked and selected project, daylighting lower Valley Creek as well as a Valley Creek Master Plan and next steps for completion. Funding: GreenLink Phase I and Phase II is funded by a National Estuary Program through a Near Term Action as well as the Stormwater Strategic Imitative and EPA Puget Sound Geographic Funds.The two grants comprise a total of approximately$496,000.The City of Port Angeles is a project partner and stakeholder. Recommendation:No recommendation required. Presentation offered as an update briefing to City Council. Background / Analysis: In partnership with the City of Port Angeles(the City) and Herrera Environmental Consulting (Herrera), Futurewise is coordinating GreenLink Port Angeles, a watershed-scale planning process for developing an integrated network of multi-benefit green stormwater infrastructure (GSI)projects. Susannah Spock, the Water,Fish and Wildlife Program Manager with Futurewise will be describing the project with a focus on next steps for the selected lower Valley Creek Daylight Feasibility Assessment and Valley Creek Master Plan. In 2016,Futurewise partnered with the City of Sequim to submit a Near Term Action(NTA)to the Puget Sound Action Agenda. The initial NTA,2016-0199,received a$248,000 grant funded through EPA's Puget Sound Geographic Funds. When Futurewise received the grant in 2018, Sequim decided that they were not in a position to take on the project at that time. The Sequim partners suggested that the City of Port Angeles may be interested in participating instead and it was determined that the project aligned well with the City's stormwater infrastructure vision and goals. Futurewise later applied for and received a second NTA,2018-0615,through the Stormwater Strategic Initiative and EPA Puget Sound Geographic Funds for$248,000. Phase I was used to develop an integrated network of implementable green infrastructure project recommendations and Phase II is intended to support the advancement and implementation of selected projects identified in Phase I. The Phase I prioritized list consists of projects and policy recommendations that would provide multiple,overlapping benefits to habitat,water quality and community assets like walkability while helping the City achieve their National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit requirements and other stormwater management objectives. A GreenLink Advisory Committee (GLAC) April 5, 2022 I - 1 was formed to provide expertise,local knowledge, and guidance throughout the iterative planning process.The GLAC has been coordinated by Futurewise and Herrera staff and includes representatives from the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe,the City of Port Angeles, Clallam County, Olympic National Park, the Fiero Marine Life Center,Washington Sea Grant, a consultant with Natural Systems Design and other environmental professionals and stakeholders. A significant amount of community outreach and engagement on the project selection occurred in 2019 at a City Council meeting,the Farmer's Market, a public library open house, and walking tour. The selected project is to perform a Valley Creek Daylighting Feasibility Assessment and Valley Creek Master Plan.Two phases of Valley Creek habitat restoration and fish passage removal were already implemented, a Phase 1 fish passage improvement project under Hwy 101 and a Phase 2 project to restore and re-meander a portion of channelized creek. The City also funded a Phase 3 design to improve fish passage in the upper portion of the Valley Creek Culvert, south of W. 2nd St. Phase 3 was not awarded construction funding and has yet to be implemented because it did not fully address the downstream barrier in lower Valley Creek. This feasibility assessment will include the evaluation of multiple alternatives to identify the best alignment for the daylighting of lower Valley Creek downstream of the Phase 3 project design extents. Susannah will present the vision,next steps and timing of performing the Feasibility Assessment and will be available to answer questions after the presentation. Funding Overview: No impact to City budget at this time. The City is a partner in a National Estuary Program Near Term Action. Attachment: Valley Creek Daylight Feasibility Assessment Project Summary Sheet, Green Link Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report and Appendix April 5, 2022 1 - 2 futureCity of Port . Feasibility greenL wise - Assessment Po�T N"F E, Project • PROBLEM DESCRIPTION The lower portion of Valley Creek is conveyed in a culvert system between the outfall into the Valley Creek Estuary and 6th St.along Valley St. (Figures 1 and 2).The culvert system is approximately 2,100 feet in length and has been identified by WDFW as a slope barrier with a 33 percent passability rating. Daylighting the stream was the top-ranked project identified by the Port Angeles Greenlink Advisory Committee due to its potential to restore critical habitat, improve stormwater management,and provide education and mobility benefits to the community while building on previous watershed enhancement efforts. Multiple creek alignment options have been proposed for daylighting this segment of stream and several stormwater management opportunities were identified through desktop and field analysis in 2020 and 2021.The purpose of this project would be to complete a creek daylighting feasibility study that includes an assessment of stream routing alternatives from the terminus of the proposed Phase 3 projectjust south of W.2nd St.,to the Valley Creek outlet at the estuary,that considers stormwater management opportunities, fish passage requirements, pedestrian/wheelchair mobility and vehicle circulation,geomorphology and hydraulics,and potential project segmentation.The lower watershed is highly developed with many potential constraints that will also need to be evaluated such as current and planned commercial and industrial uses, utilities,existing storm drain infrastructure,and soil contamination. PROJECT HISTORY Valley Creek has been and continues to be the subject of significant interest for restoring habitat, removing barriers to fish passage, managing stormwater and providing recreational and educational opportunities.To date, several projects have already been implemented along the creek (Figure 1), including:the restoration of the Valley Creek Estuary,a "Phase 1"fish passage improvement project under Hwy 101,and a "Phase 2" project to restore and re-meander a portion of channelized creek.Additionally,a "Phase 3" project was developed and designed to improve fish passage in the upper portion of the Valley Creek Culvert,south of W.2nd St.,through the addition of baffles to an 800-foot segment of the culvert and a partial daylighting of the uppermost 500 feet of pipe. Phase 3 also included restoration of a section of the creek upstream of the planned daylighting. Phase 3 was not awarded construction funding,apparently because it did not fully address the downstream barrier and has not yet been implemented. PROPOSED STUDY The feasibility assessment will include the evaluation of multiple alternatives to identify the best alignment for the daylighting lower Valley Creek, downstream of the Phase 3 project design extents(Figure 1).The assessment will assume that the current project will extend approximately 750 linear feet from the outfall into the Valley Creek Estuary, upstream to W.2nd Street and connect to the end of the proposed Phase 3 project. Since the Phase 3 project proposes to leave an 800-foot portion of the existing culvert in the ground,the developed alternatives will consider how the project would function with future daylighting projects.The assessment will consider two potential alignments that have been previously proposed,with the potential to identify an additional alignment during the assessment.The feasibility assessment will include a desktop analysis of available data,the development of alternative alignments and preliminary grading, a hydraulic study,a geomorphic study of the creek,evaluation of potential stormwater facility size requirements and locations, evaluation of mobility improvements, and an alternatives assessment that considers stream alignments,fish passage and habitat requirements, right of way requirements, stormwater management, and pedestrian corridor improvements.The studies will be used to evaluate the feasibility of the stream daylighting alignments and select the most appropriate alignment. Securing the land area required to daylight Valley Creek will require engaging with multiple private landowners and stakeholders due to the significant level of development within the lower watershed. It is anticipated that the feasibility of any alternative will be largely dependent on landowner willingness to sell and/or to provide easements for the proposed project.Therefore,to provide the advisory committee with the opportunity to facilitate these discussions early, and focus the efforts of the feasibility study, a two-part approach may be taken with two major milestones as follows: ■ Milestone 1 —After completion of the desktop review. Provide a brief email summary of preliminary findings to the advisory committee.This summary may include information regarding; number of potentially impacted properties, property ownership information, property land use information, number of potentially impacted structures, impacts to future development plans,stormwater catchment impacts, existing ground profiles, and major traffic implications.A virtual meeting will be held with the advisory committee to discuss the findings and potential next steps.At this point,the committee would have the opportunity to screen potential alternatives,engage with stakeholders, and provide direction on the alignments to be considered in the remainder of the study. ■ Milestone 2—After completion of the remaining tasks in the feasibility study.A virtual meeting will be held with the advisory committee to present the results of the studies and provide recommendations for the final project alignment. April 5, 2022 1 - . HERRERA future . Feasibility green) wlse � — Assessment Project Summary Sheet Estimated Cost:$84,250 Valley Creek Estuary , Piped Reach of N� Valley Creek P Pro aectArea r W (Designed Valley Creek Estuary Phase 2 a �' �"� , ;� Project Area (Complete) Stream PIPed Reach Phase 1 � H i �x 9 �� Phase 3 (Complete Phase z f 0 1,500 3,000 6,000 Feet r Figure 1. Project Location and Historical Projects. Figure 2. Upstream Inlet to Lower Valley Creek Culvert. April 5, 2022 1 -.4 w� HERRERA future . Feasibility green) wise gAssessment Project Summary Sheet Estimated Cost:$84,250 ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENT TASK DETAILS Project Management Includes costs associated with invoicing and budget tracking. Data Review and Desktop Analysis This task involves the assimilation and review of available datasets and previous studies relating to Valley Creek and the project area.The purpose of this task is to identify project constraints, identify potential project stakeholders, inform the development of project alternatives, and support the subsequent tasks required for the assessment. Examples of datasets of interest include:topographic LiDAR datasets,as-built drawings for the culvert and estuary restoration projects,construction drawings for the proposed Phase 3 restoration project,GIS property ownership information, GIS utility mapping,existing utility and stormwater infrastructure plans, previous hydraulic and geomorphic studies,and available master plan studies. Geomorphic Evaluation This task will involve an assessment of the lower portions of Valley Creek.The work will draw upon existing studies and available information and will include a day of fieldwork to collect data along the lower reaches of Valley Creek.This task will help identify the appropriate channel cross section and morphology to be used for the reconstructed creek. Alternatives Development This task will include developing preliminary horizontal and vertical alignments and proposed surfaces for the two alignments previously proposed for the project,with the potential for a third alignment, if necessary.The proposed grading surfaces will be used to evaluate the space requirements for the daylighted channel and provide the necessary data for hydraulic modeling.A key element of this task will be developing alternative alignments that work with the various site constraints, including known utilities, existing roads,and property boundaries.The alternatives will consider how the current daylighting project will be compatible with future potential upstream daylighting projects. Alignment 1 —This alignment involves daylighting Valley Creek primarily along Valley Street,from the outfall into the Valley Creek Estuary to the end of the Phase 3 restoration project, near W.2nd Street.This alignment would likely require a permanent closure of portions of Valley Street. See alignment on Figure 3 for details. Alignment 2—This alignment would avoid daylighting along Valley Street by routing the creek through several properties owned by the Port of Port Angeles and the City of Port Angeles between the estuary outfall and the end of the Phase 3 restoration project, near W.2nd Street. See alignment on Figure 3 for details. Alignment 3*—It is possible that a 3rd alignment or modification to Alignments 1 or 2 may be identified during the assessment work that may also need to be evaluated. Hydraulic Modeling This task will involve 1-D hydraulic modeling using HEC-RAS to characterize the performance of each proposed alignment alternative with respect to fish passage requirements for salmonoids and Pacific Lamprey,flow velocities, depths,sedimentation issues, and flooding risk. Model runs will be conducted using two flow rates;a 2-year event to simulate a geomorphically active bankfull discharge, as well as a 100-year event to characterize flooding risks.At this time, is assumed that hydrology data will be available from previous studies and/or regional regression equations,sufficient to complete this task. Stormwater Management Options Development This task will evaluate options for managing stormwater from adjacent surfaces in the study area, including options for constructing BMPs next to the stream alignment to maximize project benefits.The evaluation will include determining the type of stormwater BMPs that could be applied,the BMP size,and locations along the alignment.The intent of this analysis will be to provide a level of detail needed to evaluate whether stream alignment alternatives are more or less compatible with stormwater improvement opportunities. Evaluation of more"regional" stormwater management opportunities,such as installation of stormwater facilities at outfalls, is excluded from the scope of this task but could be evaluated in a separate project. Transportation and Mobility Study Potential transportation and mobility impacts and opportunities will be evaluated and mapped relative to the stream realignment alternatives.The intent of this analysis will be to provide a level of detail needed to evaluate whether any of the stream alignment alternatives have greater traffic impacts or potential compatibility with mobility improvements, including the watershed loop trail and Olympic Discovery Trail. April 5, 2022 1 - 6HERRERA future of Port . • gr� r�� wise - Assessment Project Initial Acquisition and Easement Assessment Property ownership and willingness to sell or provide permanent easements will be evaluated in the study area.This will include outreach to property owners in areas where property acquisition or easements would be required to assess their willingness to sell their property or provide permanent easements to accommodate stream realignment. Cultural Resource Assessment This task will define an area of potential affect, evaluate cultural resources within that area,and complete a cultural resource assessment report. Alternatives Assessment The purpose of this assessment is to identify the most suitable project alignment for the daylighting the lower portion of Valley Creek and identify other key considerations for project implementation. Each alternative will be compared using a decision-matrix style assessment with criteria to identify the pros and cons of each developed alternative alignment.The criteria developed for this assessment would incorporate the project and community goals as well as known project constraints such as fish passage and habitat requirements, right of way requirements,traffic implications, impacts to existing buildings, mobility improvement opportunities, stormwater management opportunities, known utility and cultural resource conflicts, known or suspected soil contamination, property owner willingness to sell, and hydrologic and geomorphic considerations. Relative cost considerations between the alternatives will be discussed in the alternatives assessment, however planning level project costs estimates have not been included in the study at this time.The results from this task will be summarized in an assessment report. Reporting A report will be provided documenting the work conducted for the feasibility assessment and the key findings.As a part of this report, concept-level engineering sketches for the preferred alternative alignment will be developed,sufficient for discussions with project stakeholders or future grant applications for additional design work. April 5, 2022 1 - wl HERRERA future . • greenl wise ji COST ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS The costs estimate developed for this feasibility assessment was based on similar feasibility assessments with comparable task efforts.The estimate includes an assessment up to 3 proposed alignments.The estimate assumes that sufficient utility location data can be made available and that no additional survey work is required. Relative project cost considerations between alternatives will be discussed as a part of the decision framework but planning level cost estimates have not been planned for at this stage of the project. PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE Task Schedule Year 1 Months 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Project Management x x x x x Data Review and Desktop Analysis* x Geomorphic Evaluation x Alternatives Development x x x Transportation and Mobility Study x x x Initial Acquisition and Easement Assessment TBD TBD TBD TBD Cultural Resources Assessment x x x Hydraulic Modeling x x Alternatives Assessment x x Reporting x *Schedule assumes no delays to start Alternatives Development task after Milestone 1. April 5, 2022 1 - �,, HERRERA a W Front t �,♦ 1 apt ,,.:: ,+� AOL a , ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ I W 1st St 1 1 1 - 1 : W 2nd St 4 y z M b - A& , N. it w. sy� Alignments will connect to the W 3rd St modified culvert section from the Lr. proposed Phase 3 Project X. Mew. Legend Figure 3. Daylighting Alignment 1 Valley Creek Daylighting Feasibility 'Daylighting Alignment 2 Assessment: Project Alignments. � .,, �; .,:: Phase 3 Designed Project 0 75 150 300 Existing Storm Drain ' Feet APN Boundary ' ' ' i Study Area "J") H E R R E R A w,..., A , EvaluateAprMa5[ 2022 Clallam County,City of Port Ingcle8 11 L7 •. �....................1 Improvement Oppor unities K:\Proj,d,\Y2019\19-W05D000\Pro\ValleyC,,k\ValleyC,,k.ap, greentink PORT ANGELES P �, r4 9 J uc ,Ua GreenLink Port Angeles r 1 Phase 1 Summary Report future February 2022 wise J April 5, 2022 1 - 9 This project has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement PC01J18101 to the Washington Department of Ecology. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. GGreenLillpoorrttAngeles Phase 1 Summary Report February 2129 CONTENTS Executive Summary...................................................................................... 1 Background .................................................................................................. 1 Project Description and Goals...................................................................... 1 The GreenLink Advisory Committee............................................................. 2 Community Outreach and Engagement....................................................... 3 Site Selection Process.................................................................................. 5 Project Development and Selection ............................................................. 6 TribalConsultation........................................................................................ 8 TimelineDelays............................................................................................ 8 Lessons Learned.......................................................................................... 9 NextSteps for Phase II................................................................................. 9 Appendix....................................................................................................... 11 GGreenUn IPoorrttAngeles Phase 1 Summary Report February 2121 Executive Summary In partnership with the City of Port Angeles (the City) and Herrera Environmental Consulting (Herrera), Futurewise is coordinating GreenLink Port Angeles, a watershed-scale planning process for developing an integrated network of multi-benefit green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) projects. Modeled after a successful pilot in Bellingham, WA, a holistic, data driven approach was used to create a prioritized list of GSI projects and programmatic recommendations that maximize the value of management investments by providing overlapping improvements to water quality, habitat and other community assets like walkability (see Appendix A.1). Public outreach was conducted and a GreenLink Advisory Committee (GLAC) was formed to guide planning and provide expertise on the identification, analysis and scoring of potential project sites. Conceptual project designs were developed and ranked based on the opportunities to provide co-benefits to ecological health and quality of life using GSI and implementation feasibility. The GLAC voted to select the highest-ranking project for advancement in Phase II, Alternative A: the development of engineering plans to daylight lower Valley Creek, and added the creation of a Valley Creek Master Plan. Background In 2016, Futurewise partnered with the City of Sequim to submit a Near Term Action (NTA) to the Puget Sound Action Agenda. The initial NTA, 2016-0199, was recommended for funding by the Stormwater Strategic Initiative, and received a $248,000 grant funded through EPA's Puget Sound Geographic Funds. When Futurewise received the grant in 2018, Sequim decided that they were not in a position to take on the project at that time. The Sequim partners suggested that the City of Port Angeles may be interested in participating instead and it was determined that the project aligned well with the Citys' stormwater infrastructure vision and goals. Futurewise later applied for and received a second NTA, 2018-0615, through the Stormwater Strategic Initiative and EPA Puget Sound Geographic Funds. The second grant in the amount of $248,000 was combined with the initial grant into Phase I and Phase II of the GreenLink project. Phase I was to be used to develop an integrated network of implementable green infrastructure project recommendations and Phase II is intended to support the advancement and implementation of selected projects identified in Phase I. Project Description and Goals The goal of GreenLink Port Angeles Phase I was to develop a prioritized list of integrated GSI projects and policy recommendations that would provide multiple, overlapping benefits to habitat, water quality and community assets like walkability while helping the City achieve their National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit requirements and other stormwater management objectives. Potential project sites were evaluated and scored using a variety of methods including a process called "heat mapping" (see description below) and stormwater FAN J�TMFM?Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report February 212 project concepts were created to address site specific concerns while simultaneously capitalizing on the unique opportunities associated with that location. The original plan was to generate three to five detailed summary sheets for the highest-priority projects, one or more of which would be selected for implementation in Phase II. The remaining summary sheets would be used to seek funding for future project completion.Alternatively, the GLAC decided to pursue advancement of only the highest-ranking project in Phase II, daylighting lower Valley Creek to the extent allowed by time and funding. The creation of a master plan was a component added in response to GLAC discussions regarding the need for a cohesive vision for ongoing watershed-scale work. This approach will incorporate and build upon the extensive restoration and planning work already completed for Valley Creek. The construction is not included under this grant. I �•. a .ti In 1 Ma GLAC Meeting The GreenLink Advisory Committee A GreenLink Advisory Committee (GLAC) was formed to provide expertise, local knowledge, and guidance throughout the iterative planning process. The GLAC has been coordinated by FAN J�TMFM?Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report February 2121 Futurewise and Herrera staff and includes representatives from the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, the City of Port Angeles, Clallam County, Olympic National Park, the Fiero Marine Life Center, Washington Sea Grant, a consultant with Natural Systems Design and other environmental professionals and stakeholders. While the composition of the group and the positions of certain participants has changed somewhat over the course of the project, the core group has remained consistent. Defining and selecting analysis categories, identifying data sources and community priorities, filling dataset gaps, vetting analysis results, ranking potential projects, and voting for an alternative to advance in Phase II, are among the many contributions of the GLAC. Ma b � d Community engagement mapping exercise Community Outreach and Engagement Several steps were taken to provide the Port Angeles community with project information and to gather local knowledge and input on creek conditions, project preferences and assets definition. The GLAC reviewed the preliminary Outreach Plan and recommended the events attended to FAN J�TMFM?Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report February 2622 solicit community input. The following public engagement activities were coordinated by Futurewise staff: • A project overview presented to the Port Angeles City Council and members of the public at a Council Meeting in May, 2019 (see Appendix A.2). • Four tabling/outreach events were set up at the Port Angeles Farmers' Market and the Arts & Draughts Festival during the Summer of 2019. • An open house was held at the North Olympic Library System in August of 2019. • A walking tour in the Valley and Peabody Creek Watersheds was led by GLAC participant Ed Chadd. '' .der � .e• 'r � ., \I M N z•� yl W{• v y x y y . Walking tour led by Ed Chadd Anr F4e'J 1! ii q??Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report February 2121 Site Selection Process Potential project sites were identified, evaluated and prioritized using a data analysis method called "heat mapping" (see below) in combination with desktop analysis, on the ground investigations, and input from the GLAC. After discussion and a review of the Bellingham model, the GLAC selected water quality, habitat and community assets as the categories for the data analysis. While Peabody Creek, Tumwater Creek, and Valley Creek were the initial focus, this scope was expanded to include the other two watersheds within the City of Port Angeles, Dry Creek and Ennis Creek, at the suggestion of the GLAC. An overview of the site selection process and scoring method follows. C PI@Yl4Y: -i.'+L�YIIY",1 QW1wrw [`Cilil'i:7� 4irMifF'}" 1LU I Islg Data ��I"�I�'rh AaaiyuL CIVIMCIn 1TACi Saiaaallir 'Th{t .. flrLwa T'Rla 7` YOd i� wig 1z"ITu� Q �i LYs[n1 P43�rd51111 F1r�a*s,15 ran" a Site selection process diagram Lay of the Land Map Catalog Using government sources, Herrera compiled more than 75 spatial datasets of relevant watershed health metrics and other material related to project feasibility to create a "Lay of the Land " map catalog (see Appendix A.3). The GLAC then identified any gaps in the data. Heat Map Analysis A"heat mapping" data analysis was used to inform the prioritization of a list of stormwater projects and locations by greatest need and opportunity (see Appendix A.2). Individual datasets identifying watershed characteristics were grouped for analysis by water quality, habitat, and community assets. Proximity to trailheads and community gathering spaces are examples of the assets used in this process. Scoring criteria were developed for each metric that represented the overall impact of that metric on the broader analysis category. The scoring criteria was applied to a grid overlaying a given area and the individual cells of the grid were assigned a numeric value based on the scoring. p-AeY I�Te?ntZk�ort Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report February 211 A cumulative watershed function map was then created by combining individual map layers related to community assets and water quality, resulting in the "stacking" of the georeferenced grids. Habitat characteristics were considered separately to avoid constraints like critical habitat that could impact permitting. The values of the grid cells overlaying a particular location were added together to give a numeric, or "heat map" value. Locations with high numeric values were identified as sites where GSI projects would provide the greatest "bang for the buck" with overlapping benefits. The habitat maps were considered separately but in parallel to the cumulative function maps to identify synergistic opportunities for habitat improvements and avoid areas where existing habitat would constrain a project. Desktop Analysis and Site Visits A desktop analysis of relevant factors including the heat mapping results, was used by Herrera to guide on the ground investigations of the most promising locations. A small team of stormwater engineers and planners visited potential project locations in the Ennis Creek, Peabody Creek, Valley Creek and Tumwater Creek watersheds in Port Angeles to further assess the opportunities identified by the desktop analysis and to gather the information needed to develop a first draft of the list of potential GSI projects. This step informed the development of site specific GSI interventions and led to the identification of additional project opportunities. After the field reconnaissance, the team refined the project list and began developing a Project Evaluation Matrix (see Appendix A.4). Project Development and Selection A list of conceptual project designs was developed for locations where the analysis indicated a high potential to benefit from GSI interventions (see link to Heat Map Analysis after Appendix). Projects were designed to address localized issues while providing multiple improvements to water quality, habitat and community assets. A matrix was created to score and evaluate the projects with the same criteria used in the heat mapping and the addition of"feasibility". The GLAC ranked the projects following a discussion of their relative merits based on their local knowledge and expertise (see Appendix A.5). Daylighting Valley Creek and the installation of a comprehensive recreational trail system received the highest ranking. During the discussion of this concept, it was also suggested that a master plan would be an important next step for realizing the broader vision for Valley Creek. Overall, there was less enthusiasm expressed for any of the other projects on the list and it became clear that the group preferred to focus exclusively on advancing the Valley Creek projects. FAN J�TMFM?Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report February 2�22 *n. v ryn C y y Roadway overlaying Valley Creek Alternatives Development and Final Project Selection To evaluate the idea of pursuing the Valley Creek project at the exclusion of further developing the other priority projects, thus deviating from the original project plan, it was determined that more information was required to understand the significant constraints associated with these sites. To compare potential approaches and options moving forward, a list of three alternatives was developed that included the most feasible or otherwise suitable components of the two highest ranking projects (see Appendix A.6). A third, more flexible alternative was created to address the preferences of some GLAC members and that would also align closely with the City's strong interest in cleaning up Peabody Creek. This alternatives assessment was based in part on the previous work of the GLAC and extensive, additional background research. The opportunities and constraints of each option were used to inform a discussion by the GLAC prior to the vote leading to the selection of Valley Creek projects for pursuit in Phase II. F4eY I�i-e2nnZZk�ortAngeles Phase 1 Summary Report February 2122 Summary Sheets and Feasibility Study The selection of a single project for implementation in Phase II eliminated the need to produce multiple summary sheets; however, all of all the GSI project concepts associated with Valley Creek will be included in the Watershed Master Plan for reference and in-depth consideration at a later date and stormwater infrastructure enhancement will be emphasized throughout the design process. The City has affirmed support for this adjustment because the plans produced can be used by the City to seek funding to address long standing problems with the Valley Creek culvert identified as an unfunded priority stormwater project in the Capital Facilities Plan. The remaining time and consultant funds earmarked for Phase I were spent on developing a summary sheet outlining elements of the feasibility study necessary to implement Alternative A, including an assessment of two potential routing options for lower Valley Creek see Appendix A.7). The evaluation of an additional potential route was proposed by a GLAC participant as a way to avoid soil contamination and other constraints. Tribal Consultation Because of their unique political status and cultural relationship to the land, it is essential that the interested Tribes have ample opportunities for early and robust engagement in the project planning process, beyond the limits of the GLAC forum and standard Section 106 consultation requirements. To ensure that the project design and implementation are informed by, and responsive to, tribal input and preferences, we have sent an invitation for a separate, in depth consultation to the Lower Elwha Tribe Business Committee Chair that also recognizes the ongoing contributions of their staff to the GLAC (see Appendix A.8). At the outset of Phase 11, additional invitations for consultation will be sent to the other interested tribes. Timeline Delays The disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the project timeline. Important field surveys planned by Herrera for March, 2020, had to be postponed until June 2020 due to coronavirus related gathering restrictions. Following the successful completion of this on-site survey, the project again began to make progress and a major milestone was completed in November 2020 when a preliminary project list and prioritization matrix were presented to the GLAC. Another major delay occurred in February of 2021 due to an unexpected reduction in staffing. Hiring a resident of Port Angeles to serve as the new project manager and obtaining an 18-month extension of the project timeline from the Department of Ecology, were among the steps taken to respond to these challenges. An FAN J�TMFM?Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report February 2e2! Lessons Learned Tribal Engagement An earlier, comprehensive tribal engagement strategy may have led to a more timely and productive process by providing valuable perspective on local needs and priorities, previous efforts, and the cultural, historical, and social contexts. Data Driven Approach Heat map analysis may not be the most effective or efficient route to achieve the desired outcome in Port Angeles and it should not be presumed that an approach that proved useful in one community will produce an equivalent benefit to another. While data analysis provides some quantitative validation of the site selection process, there may be less time consuming and costly ways to secure a comparable result given that the projects ultimately selected are mostly similar to ones identified and prioritized prior to this undertaking. The underlying assumption that the data layers used for heat mapping are additive and that sites receiving the highest score are the most suitable for project placement may be an oversimplification of the factors influencing these decisions. The high level of site-specific knowledge and expertise held by this GLAC could have been used to select projects based on needs already identified by the City and other local organizations with the concept of multi-benefit projects as a guiding principle and the use of data analysis for additional validation. This approach also may have led to the selection of a final project more in tune with the City's most pressing stormwater management objectives. However, that the projects ultimately chosen are of longstanding importance and high value to the community does indicate that the process was successful in identifying and prioritizing projects with merit. Predefined Framework While there were limitations in applying the Bellingham GreenLink model in Port Angeles, having an established framework was valuable for providing a path forward and a forum for important discussions and decision making. Initiating an entirely new process would have taken time and led to untested results. It is possible that hiring someone with the type of local knowledge and expertise held by the members of the GLAC could have facilitated a rapid adaptation of the GreenLink process to suit the unique context at the outset. Next Steps for Phase II • Maintain ongoing engagement with the GLAC. • Expand the outreach strategy to include other interested tribes. FAri 15G 2Q2 I - (� e 9 Teen in ort Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report February 2 • Continue community engagement efforts with particular emphasis on outreach to affected property owners and businesses for the daylighting project and the broader community for creation of the Valley Creek Master Plan. • Determine components of the Valley Creek Master Plan. • Complete the feasibility assessment to include an evaluation of routing alternatives and logical project segments. • Develop the scope of work and secure an engineering contract to begin plan set development, and if time allows, permitting. • Evaluate the need for consultants to work on elements of the Valley Creek Master Plan and if needed develop that scope of work and secure a contract. • Research funding opportunities for project implementation. Ag ri 20 e 0I green in Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report February 2 2 Appendix A.1 GreenLink Bellingham Project Report A.2 Memo to Port Angeles City Council A.3 Technical Memo A.4 Project Evaluation Matrix (DRAFT) A.5 GLAC Project Scoring Results Table A.6 Revised Project Alternatives A.7 Valley Creek Daylighting Feasibility Assessment Project Summary Sheet A.8 Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Consultation Letter Link to Heat Map Analysis: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/40539d2ba4e l 43f286d443Ob4l 3062fl Link to Potential Project List: https://arcq.is/CgrgAn e 1 green in Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report February 2 END OF DOCUMENT April 5, 2022 1 - 23 greentink PORT ANGELES P �, r4 9 J uc ,Ua GreenLink Port Angeles r 1 Phase 1 Summary Report 920,70M future February 2022 wise J April 5, 2022 1 - 24 This project has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement PC01J18101 to the Washington Department of Ecology. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. April 2022 1 - GreenLin portAngeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2 CONTENTS A.1 GreenLink Bellingham Project Report............................................................................. A-1 A.2 Memorandum to Port Angeles City Council .................................................................... A-49 A.3 Technical Memorandum.................................................................................................. A-55 A.4 Project Evaluation Matrix ................................................................................................ A-97 A.5 GreenLink Advisory Committee Scoring Results Table...................................................A-100 A.6 Summary of Revised Project Alternatives.......................................................................A-101 A.8 Lower Elwah Klallam Tribe Consultation Letter...............................................................A-118 A.7 Valley Creek Daylighting Feasibility Assessment Project Summary Sheet.....................A-120 April 2022 1 - GreenLin portAngeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2 GREEN... . B E L L I N G H A �%A PROJECT REPORT GREENLINK BELLINGHAM TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PROJECT r• I future wise j Futu rewise 816 2nd Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 343-0681 p-arge��-' J� CK ?k Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February AT Note: Some pages in this document have been purposely skipped or blank pages inserted so that this document will copy correctly when duplexed. F4e��-1 Green Uk Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2� GREENT.i == Zm B E L L I N G H A M PROJECT REPORT WATERSHED-BASED GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING PROJECT r I future wise j HERRERA FUTUREWISE HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 816 2ND AVENUE, SUITE 200 114 MAGNOLIA STREET, SUITE 505 SEATTLE, WA 98104 BELLINGHAM, WA 98225 (206) 343-0681 (360) 398-5075 JAN UARY 30, 2017 p-arg0151�2H?k Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2�2 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................................................ iii ExecutiveSummary....................................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................. 1 Purposeand Background...................................................................................................................... 1 Approach............................................................................................................................................... 1 StudyArea.............................................................................................................................................3 FocusArea.............................................................................................................................................4 GREENLINK PROCESS .................................................................................................................................. 11 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT...................................................................................................................... 15 WatershedBus Tour............................................................................................................................ 15 SpeakOut Booths and Outreach at Local Events.................................................................................18 Neighborhood Presentations..............................................................................................................20 MAPPING AND ANALYSIS............................................................................................................................21 "Lay of the Land" Existing Conditions Maps .......................................................................................21 GreenLinkHeat Maps..........................................................................................................................26 HabitatMaps.......................................................................................................................................30 POTENTIAL PROJECTS: SQUALICUM CREEK WATERSHED...........................................................................31 TOP GREENLINK RECOMMENDATIONS: SQUALICUM CREEK WATERSHED................................................33 FINDINGS AND LESSONS LEARNED.............................................................................................................41 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................................43 APPENDICES Appendix A Map Catalog (Citywide) Appendix B Cumulative Heat Map (Squalicum Creek Watershed) Appendix C Heat Maps (Squalicum Creek Watershed) Appendix D Initial Project Summary Sheets (Squalicum Creek Watershed) ---------------------- k�, 5 4 5� c l k h_II rah_ C I-=re p:ir _.,. PN5eAnr��-�51�2 enRk Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February A29 Appendix E Top Project Summary Sheets (Squalicum Creek Watershed) Appendix F Squalicum Creek Watershed Habitat Maps Appendix G Lay of the Land Analysis Process TABLES Table 1. Ranking Criteria for Attributes Considered in Existing Conditions Assessment..............22 Table 2. Water Quality Criteria and Scoring Used to Produce Heat Maps..........................................28 Table 3. Community Assets Criteria and Scoring Used to Create Heat Maps...................................29 Table 4. Mobility Criteria and Scoring Used to Create Heat Maps........................................................30 Table 5. Final Project Selection Matrix..............................................................................................................34 Table 6. Summary of Recommended Projects...............................................................................................37 FIGURES Figure 1. Squalicum Creek Watershed and Tributaries..................................................................................4 Figure 2. GreenLink Project Area: Six Watersheds of Bellingham..............................................................7 Figure 3. GreenLink Focus Area: Squalicum Creek Watershed....................................................................9 Figure 4. Bioretention Swale at Bellingham Technical College.................................................................16 Figure 5. Grassy Bioswales Along I-5, Adjacent to Bellis-Fair Mall..........................................................17 Figure 6. King Mountain Homes with Natural Area Behind.......................................................................17 Figure 7. Modular Wetland Stormwater Filter Systems, James Street....................................................18 Figure 8. Cornwall Park Notched Fish Way.......................................................................................................18 figure 9. SpeakOut Booths and Surveys............................................................................................................19 Figure 10. GreenLink Bellingham Potential Projects........................................................................................39 Data/Information Sharing Pi Ian Environmental data and information, collected and/or created under this grant/cooperative agreement is presented as part of this report. If any user would like copies of GIS layers(free of charge),please visit this website: http://www.futurewise.ora/resources/reports/areenlink-bellinaham (NOAA award number NAI4NMF4540251)"Technical and engagement project to develop a green infrastructure plan at the watershed scale, Whatcom County." The sources for all data in map layers are referenced appropriately. These environmental data and related items of information have not been formally disseminated by NOAA and do not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination, view, or policy. ii Qt 20 P'N5 e� k� -5 4 : I k belf it h re k,r I�eeenRk Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February A21 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to all the participants in the GreenLink Bellingham project. Major thanks go to the staff at the City of Bellingham who provided data for the project as well as feedback, including Rick Sepler, Lisa Pool, Renee LaCroix, Sara Brooke Benjamin, Vanessa Blackburn, Christopher Comeau, Analiese Burns, Eli Mackiewicz and Bill Reilly. Report photo credits: Figures 4 through 8: Heather Trim Figure 9: Megan Lasley Project Stakeholder and Technical Advisory Committees Representatives from the following agencies and organizations attended some or all of the stakeholder and technical advisory committee meetings held from January 2015 to November 2016, and provided valuable feedback on the data analysis and maps. Building Industry Association of Whatcom County City of Bellingham City of Redmond Huxley College, Western Washington University Lummi Nation National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association Nooksack Indian Tribe Resources for Sustainable Communities Snohomish Conservation District (Stormwater Program) Sustainable Connections Whatcom County Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Washington State Department of Ecology Whatcom Conservation District Whatcom Realtors Association Community 2 Community REE kg t15-06124-000_greenlink_hellingham_projectreport.d— 2 e��- I�eeenRk Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Februar y ry 2 2'1 Project Team Futurewise Ryan Ericson, GreenLink Bellingham Project Manager (through August 2015) Lexi Brewer, Sustainable Development Program Manager Heather Trim, Director of Science and Policy Megan Lasley, Outreach Intern Scott Quyle, Outreach Intern Herrera Environmental Consultants Christopher Webb, PE, Project Manager Jennifer Schmidt, GISP Ondrej Sklenar, PE Rayna Gleason Additional contributions came from: Chris Wierzbicki, Hilary Franz, Julia Burns, and Jack Siddoway. Thank you also to Rod Burton for providing graphic design services. Watershed Tour Speak Rose Lathrop, Sustainable Connections Dan Welch, [bundle] design studio Tim Wahl, Bellingham Parks Department Craig Mueller, PE, Bellingham Public Works Department Fundin We gratefully acknowledge funding to support this project from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (#NAI4NMF4540251) and Whatcom Community Foundation. Finally, we thank community members who attended some of the Stakeholder meetings or participated in the SpeakOuts, watershed tour, neighborhood meetings and other activities. GREENLl QQt 20 P'N5 e� kg 15-06124-000_greenI ink_beIIingham_projectrepo$.d— I�eeenRk Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GreenLink Bellingham (GreenLink) is a pilot program of coordinated project planning with the goal of creating an integrated network of green infrastructure throughout Bellingham's watersheds that provides safe, healthy movement of people, water, and wildlife. The project was motivated by the failure of current efforts to look holistically at land use planning, capital facilities planning, and water and habitat quality in urbanizing areas to meet salmon recovery goals while improving communities in the Puget Sound region. Specifically, GreenLink aimed to promote the design and delivery of green infrastructure throughout Bellingham, with a specific focus on the Squalicum Creek watershed. The GreenLink process is intended to be replicated in other watersheds and jurisdictions to benefit water quality, mobility, habitat, and community quality of life. GreenLink Bellingham built upon previous work by the City of Bellingham and others to manage Bellingham's natural resources and to maintain a high quality of life for the community. GreenLink recognizes green spaces in natural and developed areas as a network for people and wildlife. The process included seven steps: 1. Convening a broad set of community stakeholders and technical advisors to develop a vision for the watershed and provide input to the project selection process 2. Compiling and reviewing available planning and technical documents 3. Using spatial data on a broad range of environmental stressors (such as impairments to water quality and habitat), mobility, and community assets (quality of life indicators) to create a catalog of maps illustrating existing conditions of watersheds in Bellingham 4. Public education and engagement, including innovative ways to solicit community input 5. Analyzing geographic information system (GIS) data and developing "heat maps" to identify areas within the Squalicum Creek watershed that would benefit from green infrastructure projects (for example, areas with the greatest needs for water quality or habitat improvement) 6. Developing an initial set of 20 green infrastructure projects that met project goals (projects that provide multiple benefits; can be part of a green infrastructure watershed plan; are cost-effective; and are responsive to community, economic and environmental needs) k�, 5 4 -,r l i r k h_II irah_ai r l,_re p.,r, _.,. a 74e� 1�2 enHk Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2JTZ 7. Working with the GreenLink stakeholder and technical advisory groups to select a short list of projects, based on specified criteria, that are recommended for implementation in the next few years The GreenLink effort demonstrated that the City of Bellingham has a history of developing its plans in a coordinated way and based on robust analyses and public engagement. Results of the existing conditions assessment showed that, overall, the City has maintained relatively healthy watersheds, with only specific localized water quality problems. The top nine projects that were eventually selected for recommendation met all or most of the following criteria: • will provide significant ecological lift over the long term, • will achieve multiple objectives • will complement other projects • are low cost relative to performance • have community support • are included in an existing plan • are likely to be implemented within 5 years. Project descriptions developed through the GreenLink process for the top nine projects are included in Appendix E of this report. They are available for use by stakeholders to advocate for funding, enabling implementation of projects that will benefit water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, and quality of life for people in the community. GREENLl Vi ------------------- Qpt kg 15-06124-000_greenI ink_beIIingham_projectrepo$.d- 74e��-9 1�?OnHk Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2021 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND Planning efforts to recover species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act, implement municipal stormwater water quality permits, and plan for sustainable growth under Washington's Growth Management Act are often fragmented and not well coordinated across disciplines and agency departments. The resulting plans are inefficient and ineffective, and often lack support from local leaders and the community. The Puget Sound Partnership has identified a number of targets that address ecosystem recovery in urban and urbanizing areas, including land cover and development, toxics in fish, and freshwater quality (Puget Sound Partnership 2016). An important strategy to help meet those regional ecosystem recovery targets is comprehensive watershed planning, which helps jurisdictions set priorities for restoration and green infrastructure projects. GreenLink Bellingham (GreenLink) was a pilot project for comprehensive watershed planning in Bellingham, Washington. The goal of GreenLink was to demonstrate a coordinated approach for identifying projects with multiple benefits and that can be part of a green infrastructure watershed plan; projects must be cost-effective and responsive to community, economic, and environmental needs. The GreenLink process is intended to be replicated in other watersheds and jurisdictions to benefit water quality, mobility, habitat, and community quality of life. GreenLink Bellingham sought to identify environmental stressors associated with land use actions and to explore achievable solutions for eliminating or reducing impacts of stressors. Specifically, the project aimed to promote the design and delivery of green infrastructure throughout Bellingham, with a specific focus on the Squalicum Creek watershed. APPROACH GreenLink Bellingham aimed for a holistic approach to evaluate the existing condition of watersheds. Spatial data for multiple characteristics (e.g., habitat, water quality, mobility) available from City of Bellingham (the City), Whatcom County, and Washington state agencies, as well as produced by the project team, were aggregated using geographic information systems (GIS). The project team applied weighting factors to the combined data to create maps that clearly illustrated watershed conditions. GreenLink Bellingham built off decades of work by the City, nonprofit organizations, community groups, neighborhoods, and local businesses to manage Bellingham's critical land and water resources, prepare for climate change, maintain infrastructure, restore river and shoreline January 2017 GreenLink Bellingham --Project Report 1 P-arge� C71 FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2321 ecosystems, and improve pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. The City has a history of developing its plans in a coordinated way and based on robust analyses and public engagement. GreenLink was undertaken to further support the City's policies on green infrastructure, stormwater management, transportation, open spaces, wildlife and habitat areas, and shoreline and creek corridors. GreenLink was designed to assist in continuing to improve the function and performance of Bellingham's green infrastructure system, encouraging greater access and use of those spaces, ensuring the long-term health of watersheds, and extending the walking and cycling networks. Project Identification and Prioritization Just as growing communities need to upgrade, enhance, and connect their built infrastructure of roads, sewers, and utilities, they also need to upgrade, enhance, and connect their green infrastructure. Potential watershed projects were solicited from project stakeholders and then screened and evaluated to select feasible projects that will meet the project's goals. The projects selected show that the City's green assets can operate as key infrastructure that can shape and support sustainable growth, respond to the challenges of climate change, and deliver an improved quality of life for local citizens. The project team and stakeholders used several criteria to rank potential watershed projects. To be considered, a project must: • address stormwater quantity and/or quality • provide multiple benefits Projects that ranked highest: • Are in locations where they can make an important ecological difference • Have the most "bang for the buck" • Build on projects that are already constructed, underway, or in existing City or other plans • Support community desires Definition of Green Infrastructure" "Green infrastructure" is an umbrella term that includes both built and natural systems. Natural green infrastructure includes community forests and farmlands, Puget Sound and other waterways, Bellingham's parks and open spaces, and parcel-scale green spaces and trees. When such spaces are planned and managed as an interconnected, green system, they can better absorb flood waters, manage stormwater, cool the urban environment, and clean the air. They January 2017 2 GreenLink Bellingham-Project Report 11 P-arge� V1 reee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 202T also serve to promote recreation and leisure, encourage walking and cycling, and provide habitat for fish and wildlife. For the purposes of GreenLink Bellingham, green infrastructure was defined as green spaces that provide different functions within landscapes: • At the citywide scale, green infrastructure is the patchwork of natural areas that provide fish and wildlife habitat, flood protection, recreation, food production, clean air, and clean water. • At the neighborhood scale, green infrastructure serves as a stormwater management system that mimics nature, soaking up and storing water. Green infrastructure uses vegetation, soils, and natural processes to manage water and create healthier urban areas. Research has shown that green infrastructure is highly effective at treating stormwater pollution and attenuating the increased stormwater runoff associated with urban development. STUDY AREA The overall GreenLink study area comprises six watersheds in Bellingham: Bellingham Bay, Spring Creek, Baker Creek, Squalicum Creek, McCormick Creek (tributary to Squalicum Creek), Toad Creek, Whatcom Creek (Figure 1). The Lake Whatcom watershed was excluded because of significant, recent investment in water-quality-based planning and subsequent implementation of the completed management plan. The project team assessed existing conditions water quality, habitat, mobility, and community assets within the six watersheds. (See Lay of the Land"Existing Conditions Maps section of this report.) Community outreach was conducted throughout the city. REENI January 2017 GreenLink Bellingham --Project Report 3 p-�e� "2'1 FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 221 y t 1 pNmzX�e• ++��nlwT.lJrf N ,..-..... 6SiJ W hindM w 1" UNbM laWIAI"r , kNrn a+PEO SFaatmeeaal•r Pr-rrdA l6rmwa a 44a.m.Nw O+srrrr Ari, A6- r„ W Ikv%TWGI Boo diiy w' ow arAal .hat+'Yr R 14WI . mp: .I-dOkTdt,•Olf rd`Is.T%1z, Lynff%Wdw QUA I*P"'hrr� r Figure 1. Squalicum Creek Watershed and Tributaries. Source: Ecology 2012 Focus AREA A detailed case study was completed for the Squalicum Creek watershed. The Squalicum Creek watershed encompasses land within the city limits of Bellingham and in unincorporated Whatcom County. It was selected for targeted study in GreenLink Bellingham because significant growth and development is expected to occur there. Bellingham is bordered on the south by the Chuckanut Mountains, on the west by Bellingham Bay, and on the east/southeast by Lake Whatcom and the foothills of the Cascade Range of mountains. Given these geographical constraints, Bellingham will naturally grow to the north and northeast into the Squalicum Creek watershed. The City had high-resolution GIS data on the portion of the Squalicum Creek watershed within city limits (but not beyond). The County had only low-resolution GIS data for the portion of the January 2017 411 5 GreenLink Bellingham-Project ReportP-arge� 'Y1 FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2P watershed outside of the city limits. Therefore, the focus area was limited the portion of the watershed within Bellingham (Figure 2) rather than the entire watershed. Squalicum Creek is approximately 10 miles long. It originates in the Cascade foothills east of Bellingham and north of Lake Whatcom to Bellingham Bay. Major tributaries include Spring Creek, Baker Creek, Toad Creek, and McCormick Creek. The entire watershed encompasses approximately 25 square miles (Figure 3). Land uses in the watershed include suburban, industrial, rural, and natural areas. GREED IP' January 2017 GGrpretenLink Bellingham --Project Report 5 74e'A-�"4'1 FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 202� > o nnnn� �o c, o "N li ,s o m a N 3 n a= = �3m , N og cn a= 6v = 0 to eI m P 4 f P M M z Q s L- ;o 3 d w c 3 _ m ; 3 W - m —. e .�. pmD� .. m-r nr'_:.. x cmco ° y ° Em.' i o r I X • D t r c mQ .. ..L ..-. m m m ° n ° L h ox Mi xn M.m. ..1. 3 -•pm ! Pyvey_1 xo -� - ! N z°D �.r n iw—..--i,°-, .. -_ - � s tee• L.., !y <'O A QF 10 Anr F4eiA-Rll FrroeMiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2022 Iw iA 04t 8 --A h' o li A w. _ram ,4 J I Strait of �� \ Lake Georgia �� _ W-hatcom - I i Legend Figure 3. _ GreenLink Focus Area:Squalicum Squalicum Creek watershed Creek Watershed. l'I UGA boundary Principal route Secondary or collector route o 4,000 8,000 16,000 Portion of the Squalicum Watershed Feet inside of the Bellingham UGA —14 p_AVA-P671 FrroMiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 202'1 G R EEN LI N K PROCESS GreenLink Bellingham was designed as a pilot project to conduct green infrastructure planning, at a jurisdictional scale, considering benefits for three components: water quality (and quantity), habitat (for fish and wildlife), and community assets and mobility. Although several recent, watershed planning efforts in the Puget Sound area have sought to be holistic, none have addressed all three of these components. GreenLink was partially inspired by the 2013 Redmond, Washington, Citywide Watershed Management Plan (Herrera 2013). The primary goal of that plan was to focus resources and efforts into five specific watersheds to recover in-stream habitat within decades. The plan established a long-term framework for restoring surface waters in Redmond using a watershed approach that included capital investment planning, design, and construction in addition to programmatic efforts. The plan: 1) reviews existing conditions within each watershed; 2) identifies the associated needs, requirements, opportunities, and constraints; and 3) focuses rehabilitation and mitigation efforts on priority areas and issues that have the greatest potential to protect or improve beneficial uses in Redmond's watersheds. The plan also identifies specific linkages between Redmond's watershed management plan and other planning activities to foster healthier watersheds. GreenLink Bellingham built on the approach used for Redmond's watershed management plan, and added the human mobility and community asset components to the assessment. The process for conducting GreenLink followed the seven steps described below. Step 1: Convene Stakeholder and Technical Advisory Committees A stakeholder advisory committee was convened in January 2015 to provide input into the GreenLink project and met numerous times over a nearly 2-year period. The committee identified data sources, gave feedback on the overall approach, helped gather implementable projects to be evaluated, and reviewed maps and project descriptions. Committee members were representatives from local, state, and federal agencies, local non-profits, businesses, and conservation districts. See Acknowledgements section for the complete list. A technical advisory committee, which included representatives from the same entities as the stakeholder advisory committee, as well as from the City of Redmond, Washington, met less frequently. The committee's primary purpose was to ensure GreenLink Bellingham was grounded in the best available science. All stakeholder and technical advisory committee meetings were open to the public. The meetings occurred from January 2015 to November 2016, with emailed updates in between meetings. January 2017 GreenLink Bellingham --Project Report 11 All FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 202*1 74N Step 2: Compile Existing Data (Citywide) A major early effort of GreenLink Bellingham was the collection of available spatial data and previous studies for the six watersheds included in the study area. Data collection involved online searches, emails, and phone calls, and resulted in a compendium of more than 155 documents plus existing GIS datasets. Data from some of those documents and GIS datasets were used to create map layers showing existing conditions in the watersheds. Additional data from unpublished sources were included in some of the map layers. For example, for existing and planned stormwater retrofit projects, information was compiled from grant applications and unpublished reports to supplement publicly available datasets. teip 3: Conduct Public Engagement and Education (Citywide) Community engagement and education were key components of GreenLink Bellingham. The project team created basic public outreach tools, including a project website, press releases, fact sheets, and displays. Early in the project, a bus tour of the Squalicum Creek watershed was conducted for stakeholders and members of the public. The bus tour helped participants learn about existing conditions and projects in the watershed and encouraged them to share thoughts about green infrastructure opportunities. The team also developed educational games and interactive outreach booths, called "SpeakOuts," in which participants answered survey questions using stickers on large panels. In addition, surveys of community members were conducted at local festivals, farmer's markets, and other community events, and presentations and follow-up discussion occurred at regularly scheduled neighborhood meetings throughout the city. More information about public involvement is in the Community Involvement section of this report. Step 4: Create Map Catalog of Existing Conditions (Citywide) To create maps of existing conditions (or "Lay of the Land" maps) in the study area, data were initially compiled into three categories: 1. Habitat (marine, freshwater, shoreline, riparian, upland/terrestrial, etc.) 2. Water quality (conventional parameters, temperature, and toxic chemicals, etc.) 3. Community assets and mobility (trails, parks, community assets, transit, etc.) Any datasets that were too incomplete to create maps were dropped. Examples include toxic chemicals and marine shoreline health. Two initial parameters were dropped for other reasons. Wetlands could not be mapped because the datasets include a range of dates in which the basic wetland rating system was revised and the technical advisory group deemed the dataset to be incomplete. Hydrologic function/flood capacity was dropped because the City is currently doing a high-quality assessment, which will replace existing data, so any layers produced for GreenLink would be out of date within months. GE January 2017 112p2 t 5 � GreenLink Bellingham -Project Report p-4VA-Pee FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2022 Concurrent with the first phase of GreenLink, the City was finalizing the Bellingham Habitat Restoration Technical Assessment (ESA et al. 2015). The habitat assessment is intended to provide a framework to guide future restoration, protection, and recovery of the terrestrial, freshwater, and riparian habitats in Bellingham. City staff asked that GreenLink build on that work. Therefore, the six watersheds in the study area were further divided into the subwatersheds that were delineated in the City's habitat assessment, and results from that assessment were used for the habitat component of the Squalicum Creek watershed focus effort. To create the existing condition maps, parameters and stressors were assessed in each subwatershed. The current status of each parameter and stressor was assigned a relative value (high, moderate, low, etc.). The process is described in more detail in the Lay of the Land Existing Condition Maps section. The maps are presented in Appendix A. Step 5: Conduct Heat Map analysis (Squalicum Creek Watershed) After the catalog of Lay of the Land maps was complete, the project team aggregated the data to create "heat maps" that showed areas with highest need and greatest opportunity for projects in the Squalicum Creek watershed. All of the parameters and stressors that were mapped were then reviewed for redundancy and correlation to make sure that each was a unique driver. Three parameters in each category were selected to best represent the existing conditions for the analysis step. The three major categories handled this way were: • Water quality • Mobility • Community assets The three categories were overlaid to create a cumulative "function" heat map for each category. These three were combined in turn to show the "hot spots" where multiple needs could be met. The comprehensive heat map can be found in Appendix B and the supporting heat maps can be found in Appendix C. Habitat was considered separately as a fourth category using existing maps from the City's recently published Habitat Restoration Technical Assessment in order to be consistent with the existing city work and to avoid duplication. The comprehensive GreenLink heat map was evaluated side by side with the habitat technical assessment maps found in Appendix F to identify the initial list of potential projects as described in the next section. Step 6: Develop and Refine List of Potential Projects (Squalicum Creek Watershed) Looking closely at the Squalicum Creek Watershed, the project team used two questions to identify potential projects that would provide the most benefit: 1. Where are projects needed most, or where are there gaps? January 2017 GreenLink Bellingham --Project Report 13 p-arge� 'i�971 FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 202 2. Where are existing or planned projects? Water quality was used as the primary driver, followed by habitat and mobility/community assets. A list of potential projects was shown to the stakeholder and technical advisory committees to stimulate discussion of additional ideas and refine the list of potential projects. The list was narrowed to 20 projects. The project team then prepared high-level, one-page descriptions for each project, which are included in Appendix D. This step is described in more detail in the Potential Projects:Squalicum Creek Watershed section. Step 7: Select Projects to Recommendation (Squallcum Creek Watershed) Working with the stakeholder and technical advisory committees, the project team further assessed the 20 projects, using criteria such as ecological health and potential project performance. Nine projects, with the highest scores, were recommended for implementation in the Squalicum Creek watershed. More detailed descriptions of those nine projects were prepared and are provided in Appendix E. The more detailed descriptions are intended for use by nonprofit organizations, agencies, and others to help them obtain funding for project implementation. G E January 2017 1144t GreenLink Bellingham -Project Report p-a5e'A-PCPI FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2026 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Community involvement was a key part of GreenLink Bellingham and had three main goals: 1. Educate the community about the value of green infrastructure for protecting the environment, creating economic opportunity, reducing costs by developing multifunction projects, and improving the health and quality of life of Bellingham residents 2. Gather the community's visions and ideas to inform and shape GreenLink Bellingham 3. Create support for green infrastructure approaches, planning, policies, and projects. The community involvement program included traditional outreach methods and tools, such as a website (http://greenlinkbel ling ham.org), press releases, fact sheets, and displays. Bellingham has a strong neighborhood council system, so presentations about GreenLink were made at neighborhood meetings, with opportunities for dialogue about the project. Community involvement activities also included interactive outreach booths called SpeakOuts, in which participants answer survey questions using stickers on large panels, and surveys of community members conducted at local festivals, farmer's markets, and other community events. A bus tour of the Squalicum Creek watershed helped kick off the project. The community engagement and outreach activities are summarized below. WATERSHED BUS TOUR In March 2015, the project team hosted a bus tour of the Squalicum Creek watershed for stakeholder group and interested community members. The team's objective for the tour was to set the stage for GreenLink Bellingham by educating participants about watershed conditions, helping to create a common understanding of thorny key issues in the watershed, informing participants of past and ongoing projects in the watershed, discussing potential green infrastructure opportunities, and encouraging participants to provide input. Experts were invited and presented information about historical and existing conditions, ongoing projects and potential opportunities. The tour included many stops, which are listed below along with brief descriptions of related projects and issues. January 2017 GreenLink Bellingham --Project Report 15 Ta5e'A-PFl FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 202� • Bellingham Technical College Low Impact Development Project. As Bellingham Technical College has undergone significant redevelopment and expansion of new buildings, the college elected ~ to incorporate many green infrastructure projects: green roofs, bioswales (vegetated channels that move stormwater; Figure 4), and rain gardens. Repurposing existing green infrastructure facilities would save the college money because it would not have to build large detention facilities. • Bellingham's Greenway Program. A conservation program that started in 1990 (through property tax levies) has since developed into a set of valuable, green infrastructure assets owned by the City and Figure 4. Bioretention Swale at used for passive recreation. In total, about 150 Bellingham Technical College. transactions have netted approximately 900 acres of fish and wildlife habitat and trails. Land was initially acquired for conservation, habitat corridors, and stormwater management purposes. For example, in one location, the City is using an old channel to create green stormwater infrastructure. • Birchwood Neighborhood. The vast majority of parcels in the Birchwood neighborhood are developed, and most of the homes were legally built to code before stormwater controls were required. There is no regulatory requirement to retrofit existing development to implement modern stormwater management practices. Speakers at this stop discussed challenges related to incentivizing and planning for retrofitting neighborhoods with bioswales or other green infrastructure. • Bakerview Costco Site. At and adjacent to a new Costco store, development is occurring at a rapid pace. A large, residential development, incorporating 440 dwelling units (single- and multi-family) is planned for a site adjacent to the Costco site. Improvements required for new construction (including a regional stormwater pond) will meet the City's current stormwater standards, but there will be gaps in bike lanes, sidewalks, and other links to adjacent areas. At the nearby Fred Meyer store, required landscaping between the parking lot and the street was installed as mounds rather than as bioswales. The required landscaping could be retrofitted for bioretention. In sum, this is a transition area with partial infrastructure. Speakers at this stop focused on the following key questions: How can the City facilitate movement (circulation) of people and connection to other hubs and destinations? How can the City manage gaps in the stormwater infrastructure in the interim, that is, until future development can fill the gaps by building the rest of the system? Is there a way to incentivize the existing businesses to retrofit? GE January 2017 116Q6tt GreenLink Bellingham -Project Report p-arge U2'1 FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2028 • Bellis-Fair Mall. The Bellis-Fair Mall opened in 1988 with parking lots sized for the peak shopping day, i.e., the day after Thanksgiving. Thus, the mall has overflow parking lots, from old lease terms, that are empty most of the time. One is now completely fenced off. Another was being used for motorcycle training as the bus tour drove by. The question is: What can we reasonably do that would help the landowners and would help with stormwater management? There are grassy bioswales along one side of the mall (along Interstate 5 [I-5]; Figure 5). Linking existing green infrastructure to retrofits could provide the greatest benefit for water quality and residual time to slow the flow of stormwater. Figure 5. Grassy Bioswales Along • Trails. There is conflict around managing access I-5, Adjacent to Bellis-Fair Mall. within riparian areas. On the one hand, there is desire to develop more trails (Bellingham has an excellent trail system); on the other is desire to protect and restore fish habitat, which requires trees and other riparian vegetation. To achieve a balance, future environmental stewardship can be encouraged by providing access to sensitive areas while managing the health of natural systems. Could an easy system of trail types be developed that correlates trail use to standard construction dimensions? • King Mountain Neighborhood. A relatively high- density, single-family neighborhood next to King Mountain (Figure 6 is slated for significant growth. The steep slope behind existing homes is forested and provides wildlife corridors. The neighborhood lacks some urban services, such as transit, because it is an isolated area within the city limits. The key question related to this stop is: How do we maintain existing wildlife habitat and connections while increasing density within the city limits? Figure 6. King Mountain Homes with Natural Area Behind. January 2017 GGrpretenLink Bellingham --Project Report 17 p-arge�HY1 FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2021 • James Street Corridor/Squalicum Creek Reroute at a , Sunset Pond. As part of the James Street Bridge replacement project, the City implemented several measures to improve water quality and salmon habitat. James Street was raised above the base flood elevation for Squalicum Creek, and seven modular wetland systems were installed (Figure 7). The modular wetlands filter stormwater and then direct it into an infiltration trench under an existing parkingiF lot. They are estimated to cost 25 percent less than standard stormwater filters. A fish passage barrier at I- 5 is being eliminated. Squalicum Creek is being rerouted to use former remnant channels, which will Figure 7. Modular Wetland allow some natural stream migration, but will have Stormwater Filter Systems, James essentially no net effect on downstream flow. Any new Street. development in the area will be required to manage stormwater per current code. The City plans to improve the corridor by constructing a roundabout at the intersection of James and Bakerview Streets in 2017 and an Orchard Drive extension project in 2018. The Bay to Baker Trail goes through the site. • Cornwall Park. At Cornwell Park in the lower watershed, the flow of Squalicum Creek tends to increase velocity. A notched fish way in the creek bottom, which is bedrock, is intended to help fishp, accommodate a significant elevation " change. Key points discussed at this stop: 1) Some fish species avoid areas of high o6 velocity flow and, therefore have difficulty rA; with for some fish ways; 2) For stream ' gyp. m crossings, bridges that span the creek are preferable to culverts. Figure 8. Cornwall Park Notched Fish Way. • Lower Watershed Bluffs. Areas along Squalicum Creek in the lower watershed are eroding along bluffs, causing significant sloughing. This is likely due to increased water flows in the creek. To help reduce erosion and restore fish habitat, some tree planting projects have occurred. SPEAKOUT BOOTHS AND OUTREACH AT LOCAL EVENTS The project team conducted outreach at fairs, farmer's markets, and events in Bellingham. In addition to providing education about GreenLink and green infrastructure, a SpeakOut approach was used to gain community input. A SpeakOut booth is a twist on conventional tabling. For the project, information about GreenLink was supplemented with a large, interactive survey that was January 2017 1188t GreenLink Bellingham -Project Report P 'A-P4?1 FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2�22 presented as a series of panels, inviting participants to physically engage with the project by writing comments on the survey and to provide their written and verbal thoughts and feedback. Figure 9 shows photographs of a GreenLink SpeakOut booth. w� r _ AOL 'gyp 9 r TW �. 4 G FREE aigure 9. SpeakOut Booths and Surveys. Participants were asked to identify which watershed they lived in with a sticky dot on a map, introducing participants to thinking about environmental issues at the watershed, rather than neighborhood, scale. Participants were asked to identify places they frequently visit with sticky dots and to provide written comments. This question became the basis for scoping categories for the Community Assets map. Participants were also asked to identify the mode(s) of transportation (walking, biking, driving, bus, or other) they used to get to their most-frequented places, as well as to write where there are "gaps" in their transportation network (e.g., missing bike trails or sidewalks). Finally, participants were asked to answer "What works in your community?" and "What could be improved in your community?" and to rank the priority of various improvements in their neighborhood in a matrix. After taking the survey, many participants stayed at the SpeakOut booth for another 5 to 10 minutes, asking questions about the project and sharing their thoughts. In general, the January 2017 GGrretenLink Bellingham --Project Report 19 P-arge�HY1 FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2P21 surveys showed that most participants at the community events lived within the Whatcom Creek and Bellingham Bay areas, which make up the core of downtown Bellingham and the nearby a rea. NEIGHBORHOOD PRESENTATIONS An important part of community engagement included presentations at neighborhood council meetings. Neighborhood councils not only have direct representation to city government through the Mayor's Neighborhood Advisory Council, they also tend to be politically engaged and know how to navigate the public comment process for City planning efforts, such as the comprehensive plan update. The presentations introduced GreenLink Bellingham and how green infrastructure could be a "first choice" planning solution for Bellingham, and then showed maps of existing conditions in their local area. The GreenLink project team gave presentations to six neighborhood councils in Bellingham, including three in the Squalicum Creek watershed (bold text): • Cordata • Cornwall Park • Puget • Samish • Alabama Hill • Silver Beach After the presentations, neighborhood council members asked questions and gave valuable feedback. Some of the information exchange included: • Discussion by neighbors that the draft GreenLink map of "access to parks" was inaccurately rated because residents did not use the open space in their neighborhood as they would use a park (i.e., they lacked a developed park). • Requests for copies of the existing conditions maps • Desire to use the maps to consider projects for their neighborhood • Potential for interconnection with the City's Greenways project • Concern about increased precipitation (recently) and whether green infrastructure could mitigate excess flows • Concern about leaves in the street contributing to localized flooding problems. January 2017 2200t GreenLink Bellingham -Project Reportf-ar A-bi FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February �22 2 MAPPING AND ANALYSIS "LAY OF THE LAND" EXISTING CONDITIONS MAPS A "Lay of the Land" map catalog was created so that subsequent analyses could highlight areas of opportunity for GreenLink green infrastructure projects. After compiling available data and datasets, spatial data layers were created to map existing conditions for water quality, habitat, and mobility and community assets within the six Bellingham watersheds. Conditions of each attribute were categorized according to status (High to Low) using criteria specific to each attribute (Table 1) and using additional, citywide data layers (Table G-1, in Appendix G). Each attribute was assessed at a subwatershed scale unless the data were more appropriately analyzed at a regional scale, such as habitat patch size and open space corridors. If there was only one data point in a subwatershed, that status was attributed to the whole subwatershed. If there was more than one data point and discrete quantitative values were known for those points, then the mean value was attributed to the whole subwatershed. If the data were qualitative, then the lowest value was attributed to the whole subwatershed. If there was no data point, then the attribution was assigned the same status as the upgradient subwatershed when both following conditions were met: • The same tributary or main stem of the creek flows through both subwatershed • The two subwatersheds have similar amounts of impervious surface (same or lower status) Three attributes initially considered for inclusion in the GreenLink analysis were omitted. The attribute freshwater toxic chemicals in water and sediment was omitted because of insufficient data. Water flow capacity of drainage and associated floodplain was omitted because the City has new study underway, so data would be out of date soon. Wetlands was omitted because of inconsistent and incomplete data. Table 1 lists the attributes considered in the existing conditions assessment. For each attribute, Table 1 shows the ranking criteria for each status category, the data source(s), and the source of ranking criteria. Five status categories were used to assess existing conditions: High (high function, including upper outliers), Moderately High (good function), Moderate (adequate function), Moderately Low (poor function), and Low (very poor function). January 2017 GreenLink Bellingham --Project Report 21 P_arge�U- l FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2RR 2 , � /yy7 � \ neon ) � q ! 7§ ) � 0 J_ - [ i £ §5 ■ \ \ - - � � . 0 55 y _ \/ \ / CD < fg ) o \ ( & y _ ^ \co 0 CL D ¢ e t E M 9 ■ ` } \ ( J ( _ # , D ` @ \ ; \ \ n E _ } \ k o £ « } u ) tn \ 0 ( \ / } o AA33 ; M - , ( ƒ { f E � E [ < - \ ` / \ CD r) } K 2 3 k o ` ` a E 3 n e @f o / z \ \ { / ` \ \ \ }\ %� 3 2 ■ ■ ) 22 / 2 ) \ 7 »\ 2 & / - E w } s ± # \ %§ g - } ) 3 } \ ° \ } § J 5 ` FAe�28I3rRinkPoRAg§« Ph se1Summa% RpoRA«ka February 0 � n ( � 2c ( cr \ \ / 2 ; .. \ \ j § = cr R k ® 2 _ c LO s o ; g ƒ / 0 A 7 -------- / V V V FA / \ ? \ /) § ) \ 2 _ , , 2 JA Iv /� 3 k \ J0 e \ = � ° y ID ID , , , / 2 ID I® �: \ % ° v ^ U \ K \ ^ 0 0 / A § J ` ® a = ` 2 2 ® CD (D � f D V n _ Q / % � ±^ � JA Ie \ 9j eD IV A ° $ - y \ § / o IDID 0 ID 0, � � _ , _ , ° A. & eD z i o J; z §. / : m j \ j g , , , n r e ƒ ƒ ƒ a-) 7 \ \ ( ( D \ \ � ° ° r / _ � (D _ eD . 2 t / eD % \ / 29 / - : : \2 = / {2 / / § .. » { � , : « { � , « { � , » { � , ( & � , _ \ V ; V ; V ; , ; E : § E ; E , e PC : / : : : 2 E ° 2 FAe�29I3rRink Port Angeles Phase 1Summa% RpoRA«ka Fbu/yA? . � \ \ EA ` SEA r � � 2 , MM 7 7 E �' �. eD » » k % M E - � = 3 , E �. , . o 2 2 , f _ � , § « n , § 7 crg ° E , m � .. n - \ ! ; E 2 E e e , cr \ \ � E E � / / ` ei / ƒ k } § § ) 2 > ID 0. / 0 _0 ! �` \ \ 0 2 9 e e s 2 % % ? ` Zr) \ / / /_ D / ® _ \ \ 0 / \ \ \ G G eD ( ƒ ƒ ^ V / \ 0 / \ _ f k ƒ ƒ / ƒ $ = e e ; § / ƒ ƒ « & % MR g D w s \ \ , a a n e cr \ I` \ \ ƒ eD c z D § w = _ 2 \ \ 9 ® \ z zEe n � % 0 0 § � ƒ k m CDeD 2 eD CD $ §. \ / E X \ 0 0 � > ƒ LT Iz � \ n= e w _. S \ & « e 7 i D- 9 z 2 \ / 77 / 0 9n \ e \ = O i d n ` - : / z e o cr \ - ƒ 7 & _ \ \ E « D _ \ O < p ] 7 \ e ■ 7 ° e \ \ § m / t n r" ! CD $ 2 § 2 CD % J f -0. / /CD \ 7 / ± z = _ EA \ \ \ / ƒ 2 CD \ (D FA W1Froe inkPoRAg§« Ph se1Summa% RpoRA«ka Fbu/y2M ° \ « ) _^a \ m § § ) § r. G § / / ; D nt ; �§ � E3 � trn tr « = _ _ ; \ \ / / tr = trn � � / tr § F � s § trmool2) e Ij z ■ & ■ a 2 � e § ■ ; _ _& eD a $ / E E EF \ E2 � § $ § ■ s g / ) ; 0 _ / ; 0 = � I E / ; ■ J � E g \ � ~ F F ( J . . . rr 2 ¥.y ¥.y ¥.y ` * > o go » o / \ /_ _ \ § \ § \0\ )s x g 0 / / j0 gaga g , / & / & / & \ � o xcm eD � 0 Ln j \ � j0 Z Z5 k 2 ® 2 - 2 - \ / 1 2 2 / & / & / & g / � n \ § a•y ¥.y a•y G G \ ƒ/ 7/ ƒ/ 7 v f 0 A / / \ \ / \ / / \ R \ s § g a s a g. a ) / g F J rr 0 \ / 7/ 7/ 7/ / D r0 tn o ` o o m n \ / \ \ / \ \ 0 \ ƒ eD tn / ƒ E ; § s a s a s a » & / & » & M M 7MO \ 0 � \ 0 � / _ � _ r _ � \ m � \ / � \ 0, � \ / s s a s a s a / & / & / & n w ° 0 0 { (D 0 0 0 ( G \ /0 ° » _\ c / - / / / o t _ = � = e Eƒ g D _ _ = Eƒ / \ eD _ ® / ° C fA } _ ] 3 n k 9 eD L \ A 0 \ eD FAe�R' 3rRink Port Angeles Phase 1Summa% RpoRA«ka Fbu/y27 GREENLINK HEAT MAPS Once the catalog of Lay of the Land maps was complete, the GIS analysis moved on to produce heat maps that would facilitate identification and prioritization of projects to best achieve GreenLink Bellingham goals in the Squalicum Creek Watershed. Three categories (community assets, mobility, and water quality) and subcategories were used to identify opportunity areas and watershed needs. Criteria were developed for each category to help identify locations where projects would provide the most benefit. Datasets for the categories were overlaid to generate a cumulative heat map showing areas with multiple needs. Appendix C includes the heat maps for community assets, mobility, and water quality. Subsequently, the project team and the stakeholder and technical advisory teams viewed the heat maps alongside habitat maps that were prepared for the City's Habitat Restoration Technical Assessment (ESA et al. 2015). Those maps are in Appendix F. The teams worked together to identify target locations for green infrastructure projects and set priorities for locations where projects are needed most. The rest of this section describes in some detail the process of developing the heat maps. While the heat maps were developed to help identify and rank potential projects, they can also serve as useful planning tools. The maps identify areas where water quality, habitat, and mobility functions are poor, as well as areas where functions are meeting selected criteria (green areas on heat maps). Highly functioning areas are important to note because they represent opportunities to expand functional, intact habitat and effective, multi-modal transportation facilities. Water Quality Analysis Key water quality and quantity drivers/indicators were chosen to develop the water quality heat map (see Appendix C). Cumulative impacts were calculated from upstream to downstream throughout the Squalicum Creek watershed. For consistency with past planning efforts, some of the water quality parameters selected for the analysis were taken directly from the Bellingham Habitat Restoration Technical Assessment (ESA et al. 2015). That analysis was done at the subwatershed or habitat patch scale, whereas the GreenLink analysis was done at the pixel scale. The intent was to take a subset of the methods used in the habitat assessment, where data were available, and apply them to a finer scale for the entire watershed. The parameters for the GreenLink water quality GIS analysis were derived from the "Water Quality and Quantity" and "Chemical Regulation" criteria for characterizing upland forest habitat in the habitat assessment (ESA et al 2015). January 2017 2266t GreenLink Bellingham -Project Report p-arge��-TI Frroee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2�22 Parameters Density of Stormwater Outfolls The density of upstream stormwater outfalls draining to each 0.1 river mile (RM) of major streams in the Squalicum Creek watershed was measured. The calculation is cumulative, meaning that each RM includes the density of outfalls for the entire area upstream of that RM. Impervious Area The percent impervious area for the area draining to each 0.1 RM of major streams in the Squalicum Creek watershed was measured. The calculation is cumulative, meaning that each RM includes the percent impervious area for the entire area upstream of that RM. Water Quality Impairments Water quality monitoring data for streams in Bellingham include coliform bacteria, pH, dissolved oxygen, and temperature. For each subwatershed location pixel, the "worst-case" score from the GreenLink existing conditions analysis was used. If the subbasin was listed as low-functioning for coliform bacteria, pH, dissolved oxygen, or temperature, it was included. Scoring The data were evaluated on a scale of 1 (low functioning) to 5 (high functioning) using the criteria summarized in Table 2. The intent of applying these criteria was to prioritize areas in the Squalicum Creek watershed where the most potential improvement to water quality in receiving waterbodies could be obtained. GREED. January 2017 GGrpretenLink Bellingham --Project Report 27 P_arge� 5'l Frroee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2�2 �00 \ « ; x. E o ƒ\ \ ƒ \ k \/ \ \ 3 0, ƒ § ® \ ƒ \ / � z 3 G) = 2 2 $ e e ; ] \ \ / C Z J 0 & g / 2 _ & ) ƒ G z \ { � 0 :E tee fo a\ cu � � \ _ _ � ® @ / e � z I / � UD /ƒ1< / \ ) f \ / m. s $. 0 = v k �. ) 2 / \ & , \\ / w2 \ § / \ � m - a » / M. z \ e = - -1 g � § G � ) ) p 2 ) ® ) { E { § � 0 ku -0 ? ,. ± k ƒjk � \ \ § � E � ; ƒ / § \ ® e ƒ 0zT § / , � 0 4 / ° / 0 2 \ \ \ ° c m su IA G \ M_ o } � z { » 2 E \ 32C0 < M / o \ \ 0eD $ n ■ } $ VJ o ; g \ � M % a k A a } / ~ 2 { 0 w y ; G / \ E » \ ; § § ƒ a ® � � Rg C—C- CDE \ 0 2G 0 Ui \ 0 \ \ C- / E } § \ ) FAe��I3rRinkPoRAg§« Ph se1Summa% RpoRA«ka F&u/y2P9 Community Assets Anaiya Community asset parameters were selected to prioritize projects that provide easy opportunities for healthy activities for community members by promoting access to parks and open space or walking trails. Community gathering spaces that are accessible by all modes of transportation were also highly scored. Community asset scoring was also influenced by residential population, with access to community assets more highly scored in densely populated areas. Table 3 shows the scoring criteria based on the number of categories of community assets within 112 mile of each parcel. Scoring is also influenced by population, with more densely populated areas receiving a higher weight. Red cells indicate low functioning; orange cells indicate moderately low functioning; yellow cells indicate moderately high functioning; and green cells indicate high functioning. Table 3. Community Assets Criteria and Scoring Used to Create Heat Maps. Population per Residential Parcel' 0 (non-residential > 2.4 and < 10 Criteria Score parcel) < 2.4 people people > 10 people ... .... .... .... .... ..... ..... No community assets (as 0 mapped)within 1/2 mile 20 1 category of community 1 assets within 1/2 mile 31 21 11 2 categories of community 2 assets within 1/2 mile 32 22 12 2 3 categories of community 3 assets within 1/2 mile 33 23 13 3 a City of Bellingham 2015 Mapping. Red cells indication low functioning;orange cells indicate moderately low functioning;yellow cells indicate moderately high functioning;green cells indicate high functioning. Mobility Analysis Mobility parameters were selected to rank access to existing transit stops, pedestrian ways (i.e., sidewalks), and bikeways. Mobility scoring was also influenced by residential population, with mobility more highly scored in densely populated areas. The colors in Table 4 indicate those used in developing the mobility heat map. January 2017 GGrretenLink Bellingham --Project Report 29 P-40A-bl FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2P21 Table 4. Mobility Criteria and Scoring Used to Create Heat Maps. Population per Residential Parcel' 0 (non-residential > 2.4 and < 10 Criteria Score parcel) < 2.4 people people > 10 people No mobility infrastructure (as 0 mapped)within 1/2 mile 20 1 category of mobility 1 infrastructure within 1/2 mile 31 21 11 2 categories of mobility 2 infrastructure within 1/2 mile 32 22 12 2 3 categories of mobility 3 infrastructure within 1/2 mile 33 23 13 3 a City of Bellingham 2015 Mapping. Red cells indication low functioning;orange cells indicate moderately low functioning;yellow cells indicate moderately high functioning;green cells indicate high functioning. Cumulative Heat Map Datasets within the three categories (water quality, community assets, and mobility) were overlaid to generate a cumulative ("rolled-up" heat map (Appendix B). The map illustrates areas with multiple needs and helped the project team and others to target and rank potential project locations. The cumulative map also shows locations of planned retrofit projects. HABITAT MAPS Data layers related to habitat used for the project selection and ranking process were from the Bellingham Habitat Restoration Technical Assessment (ESA et al. 2015), which evaluated various terrestrial and freshwater habitats. No additional habitat analysis was done for the Squalicum Creek watershed. Habitat maps used for GreenLink are in Appendix F.) ,e%rrrV1 ILA January 2017 3300t GreenLink Bellingham -Project Repporrt p-a5e��-VI Frroee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2022 POTENTIAL PROJECTS: SQUALICUM CREEK WATERSHED Two framing questions were used when reviewing the heat maps and habitat maps for potential projects: • Where are the projects needed most (i.e., for the heat maps, what areas show the most red/orange)? • Where are existing or planned projects (i.e. where is a project planned that can be expanded)? Following the map review, the project team identified potential projects and the stakeholder advisory committee nominated projects to include in the initial project list for the Squalicum Creek watershed. The nominations were based on the following screening criteria. • Effectiveness o Most ecological lift for documented deficits in one or more project categories (mobility, community assets, water quality, habitat) o Durability and long-term performance • Efficiency o Achieves multiple project objectives o Economies of scale or synergistic with another project o Low cost (including capital cost as well as and operation and maintenance costs)s relative to performance • Feasibility/Timeliness o Probability that project would be implemented within 5 years (considering site ownership/control and funding availability) o Community support o In an existing city plan January 2017 GGrretenLink Bellingham --Project Report 31 P-ar 0135'1 FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2PR An initial list of 20 projects (18 site-specific projects and two programmatic projects) was generated following application of the screening criteria shown above. Figure 5 shows the project locations and Appendix D provides one-page descriptions for each project. Project description sheets include a summary of existing conditions, a project overview, illustrative photos or graphics of potential solutions, and project benefits. 'e%rrrM1 ILA January 2017 332p2 t � GreenLink Bellingham -Project Report MR5e��-VI Frroee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2022 TOP GREENLINK RECOMMENDATIONS: SQUALICUM CREEK WATERSHED The 20 projects on the initial list were reevaluated and ranked qualitatively (with a score of high, medium, or low), based on their ability to accomplish, achieve, or improve one of the following criteria. • High ecological lift • Durability and long-term performance • Ability to achieve multiple project objectives • Economies of scale or synergistic with another project • Low capital and operational and maintenance costs relative to performance • Reasonability of implementing the project in a 5-year period • Community support • In an existing city plan. Evaluation and ranking results are shown in Table 5. Eleven of the 20 projects were eliminated for a number of reasons, including lack of available space, a lower habitat or water quality benefit compared with other projects, complexities related to land acquisition complexities, or high project cost. The nine remaining projects (highlighted with blue in Table 5) were recommended for further evaluation. Those top nine projects are summarized in Table 6 and shown on Figure 10. Three-page project descriptions of each project, which present concept designs, costs, regulatory considerations, and constraints on implementation, are included in Appendix E. Each three-page description also includes graphics, such as a cumulative heat map, photographs, local access, and a project layout. January 2017 GGrpretenLink Bellingham --Project Report 33 e��- P_R5 1 Frroee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2P21 41 a w Project Number � � 00 M r/ // / = 9 $ \ \ ( 0 \ \ { _ x \ 7 / ƒ \ \ \ \ \ j \ ® z & = E o 2 o E rD- = \ } 0 � / f \ 0 0 = / k \ \® J z � \' / z z z M_ For ward? n 0 0 0 7 % w \ \ƒ E4 /J ) [ / / \ / aCr , M. \ 0 \ \ \ \ \ C r \ C= / = _ & 2 e = � EU -.- - 0 CU \ \ \ � e » 5. 1 = e = / & / / e 2 a) o # \ , \ z - = 2 ; @ 0 = m \ y 3'= _ o 0- \ rD= \ / \\ 0 { ( \ 2 E ) 02. E/ 0ƒ » G ¥ J 9ƒ ƒ » % A ) * z = k \ \ - ° g \ / LA ° � \ \ 0 \ \ \ 2 \ M .. / 9 / M q J B = r r r Hi Ecological Lift \ g § � _ < r < Durability and Long-Term Performance ] ƒ Achieves Multiple Project Objectives ] Economies @ Scale oSynergistic p I r r < Low Cost Relative to performance = I r r r Probable 5-Year Implementatio n % < I r r Community Support \ / f z / / z mangy+m City Plan? \ / P_4el b' RroWinkPortAg§« Phm ] Summa% RprtAp ka Fbu/y2M � e « w a) e \ ( / % % % \ 77 00 ) 7 7 k 9 7 ƒ / -0 ƒ 2-0 -0 Ln/ 7 0 ƒ / f % 0 ƒ « _ e e = ) p E \ E = G = _ _ , _ , , ƒ 0 2 % 7 / J a E _ — E _ — — e ® J » \ / » J » M. % / » 0 E < 2 k 2 ) k 2 ) } ) < 2 k » ± 2 k / E « 9 / /_ \ 0 ® ƒ 0 ® ® / ® / ± z 17 / ± z / / / / / / \ j � � \ yx yx x 7 ( � � \ � \ � � \ — 0 / < _ ,. 0 z % \ z / \ ƒ 3 0 a) � � �_ � � ( � 3Z5 (� e E = 7 c _. 3 \ \ \ / \ \ \ 0 ® \\ J 9 \\ = C = - -0 w \ % » % % » G \ \ \ \ \ r) / § % § e & § & ƒ ) % \ z ® ® z z z ® ® z z o a a o 0 o a a ) 0 0 z E e � e O 3= w z = - : _ z e ) / ) / _ = 3 % x 2 < a 7 a ƒ o o ] e G 7 2 0r) & £ e = % %� % / � � ƒ ° § — \ \\ E ƒ - \ ) k \ / k \ / 7 ) ƒ / 2\ &_ < « U ® \ % - E 0 & 0 / ) 0 j E k _ J e / »= x ° ( ] \ s ® } } \ = n e n e % ` § < /-0. ƒ ® _ 0 a / / e e e e e _ e e < E ¥ ¥ \ o z_ \ ƒ y o + ƒ ƒ e \ { \ � / o « / ƒ \ E « _ _ _ ƒ _ 0 G E / \ e E / = a & / .. / .. ( , _ ( e y 2 ] _ \ < o / a j a j 0 s / E \ \ 0 ( ° f e » . ) ¥ e 23 23 E 1< (D e / y § / & \ G a & a & © 7 \ & w ¥. \ o = o 2 = / \ / \ \ 0 > E \ -0 // ƒ / s ƒ / » « rT= « = _ = E UD § e & E ® ƒ / ? 2 \ \ \ 7 7 / = 2 0 _ e = e < I I < < I I I < I Loll ME �=E 4 4 4 z z z ® z z z a a a o 0 o a o 0 0 Uj FAeA-R113rRinkPoRAg§« Ph se1Summa% RpoRA«ka February-AT � 2R / \ CD z z 2 2 e : m < : � ( \ / k � (D ! » = 2 E ) ` _ 3 � / 3 % ; \ - Eef \ 6 % < 7E 2 / ! 3 ) - ! � & ! s \ ; % \ \\ j \ ! ; / § ƒ < } s a ( 0 = - ƒ ' 9 ° ` \ ± of EE � 2 _ / s $ \ § _ : { \ 2 7 s ± 7 2 ; - < / 0 / - $ $ 2 \ [ \ = y } - J \ { of = \ % s { , _ } ` : 00 \ ` 00 ƒ ƒ 0 / / F Ln f 7 ƒ { E ±a Ln f r 0 a 9 : : : La 0- ID (DF \/ { W— }r !. ¥ g 7 \ \ ° \ E 3 \ n ( \ - : 2- \ ID 2, 0 \\ 0 r 7 % 2 2 G G = e { z 2 z z { z z z \ \ o o , o 0 0 FAeA-bj3rRinkPoRAg§« Ph se1Summa% RpoRA«ka February Al Table 6. Summary of Recommended Projects. Project Number Name Description Bellis-Fair Mall Parking Lot Project would construct bioretention cells in the parking lot of the 4 Retrofit and Improvements Bellis-Fair Mall to improve water quality and reduce the amount of impervious surface area.The project would also incorporate bike and, potentially,transit improvements. Meridian Street Shopping Project would incentivize commercial landowners to complete water 7 Area—South Parking Lot quality landscape improvements on their property to improve water Retrofit and Improvements quality and habitat. Squalicum Creek Educational Project would build on recent restoration work by eliminating a 8 Kiosk and Culvert Fish Barrier current fish passage barrier.It would also include construction of an Removal educational kiosk. Supplemental green Project would enhance the currently planned transportation project to 12 stormwater infrastructure for include GSI improvements,thereby providing water quality benefits in the James Street Multimodal addition to the mobility benefits that are the focus of the Street Improvements transportation project. Supplemental green Project would enhance the currently planned transportation project to 13 stormwater infrastructure include GSI improvements,thereby providing water quality benefits in GSI for the Orchard Drive addition to the mobility benefits that are the focus of the Multimodal Use Extension transportation project. Iron Gate Neighborhood Project would provide retrofit stormwater treatment and promote 16 Retrofit infiltration where feasible in a predominantly industrial area through a combination of public and private projects. Squalicum Regional Project would plant riparian restoration,create new trails,and provide 17 Restoration Park and stormwater retrofit treatment along Squalicum Creek. Interpretive Center Fee-in-lieu Stormwater Project would evaluate the feasibility of establishing a stormwater Mitigation Program control transfer program that targets the Squalicum Creek watershed. 19 Feasibility Study The program would allow developers in certain areas to pay into a fund that would support implementation of flow control in priority areas with the highest ecological lift. Green Stormwater Program would reimburse private land owners for implementing 20 Infrastructure Incentive voluntary GSI retrofits on their property. Program Development GSI=green stormwater infrastructure GREENIM January 2017 GGrQreenLink B5 in Bellingham --Project Report p_agel-bl Grroee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February A µ ' � .'�� NC74.t5'?14F CNC;Q�C f'J� ° • ,, " r_-.,e.LSYh}�� ".: '� � " x"�n ie � �"°�� "^�' '�, 14 3 ., MAP P �} + � tik•- °ar A� N � v DP 32 3 17— y �p116' :. Far w. •. _ p � to-•• � �. �� ,�Y j�T N I a ..,,. , �• �. " " iP n ! • LUF CH FIB • n•. °l � 9J L .J r �" e u tl° e s-. ee Ia'T Fri W `,N51y a� �.^. InPtiIP Air g I •IF SIN `„i FI # " ,m, r_ r � E 1�"7 u . dti DR n :.,• "91�4� r171� 2D� '"�,. „..0 � -� L.�•..I �,:ItJ � �, ,u �.,, ,• - 1` = r a _ :'r J eye � }� � '�.• °• � e +``� - „_ ' s o B f k 1 +� 1 1 FINDINGS AND LESSONS LEARNED GreenLink Bellingham was a pilot effort to determine if a coordinated and comprehensive approach to gathering data, creating maps and generating green infrastructure projects on a watershed scale can be done in a cost-effective, meaningful manner. Findings and lessons learned included: • As a whole, the City of Bellingham has well-coordinated plans and has made priorities of both restoration and stormwater management projects. If the City continues to implement restoration and stormwater retrofit projects based on high-quality data, conditions should only improve. There remain areas of poor water quality in Bellingham's watersheds that can be addressed over time with specific projects and as redevelopment occurs. • There was a substantial amount of data for Bellingham's watersheds that had already been generated by the City other agencies. • The amount of water quality monitoring data for pollutants of concern in fresh waterbodies was limited. • Gathering and compiling data was a major challenge. Many data were in different datasets and housed in different departments at the City or at other agencies, some data were unpublished, and the data format was not uniform across datasets. • It is critical to build on existing plans to capitalize on robust planning and public engagement that has been done before. Linking such existing plans was a key component of GreenLink Bellingham. • The stakeholders did not begin the process with a ready list of potential projects. Therefore, more work than anticipated was necessary to develop feasible projects for use in the GreenLink analysis. • Because project stakeholders have a wide range of technical sophistication, data for stakeholders need to be provided at various levels of detail. • Community members were generally enthusiastic about the concept of green infrastructure projects. They were eager for the project team to return and give them results of the analysis. January 2017 GreenLink Bellingham --Project Report 41 P-arge�HY1 FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 26 721 • The pilot project demonstrated that pulling together existing data and soliciting feedback from stakeholders and community members can provide useful maps that highlight focus areas for project recommendations. January 2017 4422t 5 GreenLink Bellingham -Project Report f-ar A-bi FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February �22 2 REFERENCES Bellingham, City of. 2008. Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (PRO Plan). City of Bellingham Parks and Recreation Department. Bellingham, City of. 2011. Transportation Report on Annual Concurrency. March. Bellingham, City of. 2012a. Transportation Report on Annual Concurrency. March. Bellingham, City of. 2012b. Six-Year (2013-2018) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). City of Bellingham Public Works Engineering. Adopted June 8. Bellingham, City of. 2012c. Bellingham Pedestrian Master Plan. Prepared by Alta Planning + Design with the Walkable and Livable Communities Institute. July. Bellingham, City of. 2013a. Transportation Report on Annual Concurrency. March 1. Bellingham, City of. 2013b. Urban Streams Monitoring Program Report 2013. Prepared by City of Bellingham Department of Public Works Laboratory. Bellingham, City of. 2013c. Six-Year (2014-2019) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). City of Bellingham Public Works Engineering. Adopted June 17. Bellingham, City of. 2014a. Transportation Report on Annual Concurrency. March. Bellingham, City of. 2014b. Six-Year (2015-2020) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). City of Bellingham Public Works Engineering. Adopted June 23. Bellingham, City of. 2015a. Transportation Report on Annual Mobility. March. Bellingham, City of. 2015b. Six-Year (2016-2021) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). City of Bellingham Public Works Engineering. Adopted June 15. Bellingham, City of. 2016a. Six-Year (2017-2022) Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). City of Bellingham Public Works Engineering. Adopted June 20. Bellingham, City of. 2016b. 2016 Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance No 2016-11-037). City of Bellingham Planning and Community Development. January 2017 GGrretenLink Bellingham --Project Report 743 P-arg0145'I FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 262 Breckheimer, Ian, Nick M. Haddad, William F. Morris, Anne M. Trainor, William R. Fields, R. Todd Jobe, Brian R. Hudgens, Aaron Moody, Jeffrey R. Walters. 2014. Defining and evaluating the umbrella species concept for conserving and restoring landscape connectivity. Consery Biol. 28(6): 1584-1593. December. Ecology. 2012. Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Publication Number 12-10-030. Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality Program. Olympia, Washington. Ecology. 2012. Squalicum Creek Watershed Stormwater Pilot Total Maximum Daily Load: Quality Assurance Project Plan. Publication 12-03-109. Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality Program. Olympia, Washington. Eissinger, Ann. 1995. City of Bellingham Wildlife and Habitat Assessment, an inventory of existing conditions and background information, and Wildlife Habitat Plan. Prepared for City of Bellingham Department of Planning and Community Development by Nahkeeta Northwest. Wildlife Resource Services, Bow, Washington. December. Eissinger, Ann. 2003. City of Bellingham Wildlife Habitat Assessment. Prepared for City of Bellingham Department of Public Works— Environmental Division by Nahkeeta Northwest Wildlife Services, Bow, Washington. March (draft). ESA. 2014. Final City of Bellingham Marine Nearshore Habitat Connectivity Study. Prepared for City of Bellingham by ESA. December. ESA, Veda, and NW Ecological Services. 2015. Final Bellingham Habitat Restoration Technical Assessment. Prepared for City of Bellingham Public Works Department. Feist, B.E., E.R. Buhle, P. Arnold, J.W. Davis, N.L. Scholz. 2011. Landscape Ecotoxicology of Coho Salmon Spawner Mortality in Urban Streams. PLoS ONE 6(8): e23424. Herrera. 2013. City of Redmond, Washington, Citywide Watershed Management Plan. Prepared for the City of Redmond Public Works Natural Resource Division by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc., Seattle, Washington. November 25. Puget Sound Partnership. 2016. The 2016 Action Agenda for Puget Sound. June. Toole Design Group, Transpo Group. 2014. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan. Prepared for City of Bellingham Public Works Department by Toole Design Group and Transpo Group. WDFW. 2009. Landscape Planning for Washington's Wildlife: Managing for Biodiversity in Developing Areas. 88 Pp + App. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington. January 2017 4444t 5 GreenLink Bellingham -Project Report p-ar A-Pel FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2722 816 Second Ave, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98104 future p. (206)343-0681 f. (206)709-8218 wisefuturewise.org Memorandum From: Christopher Wierzbicki, Executive Director To: Port Angeles City Council Date: May 21, 2019 Re: GreenLink Port Angeles Attachments:Project Timeline,Frequently Used Terms,Further Resources Purpose The purpose of this memo is to provide an update to the Port Angeles City Council on the current status of the GreenLink Port Angeles project,as well as to provide project background and context. It is intended to supplement the in-person briefing Futurewise provided to the Council at the May 21, 2019 meeting. Summary of GreenLink Port Angeles GreenLink Port Angeles is a two-phase,watershed-scale, green infrastructure planning project. • The goal of GreenLink Port Angeles is to plan and begin implementing an integrated network of green stormwater infrastructure that will improve the city's water quality,habitat,and community assets; • Futurewise is an environmental non-profit organization that specializes in land use policy in Washington State. In 2017 we partnered with Herrera Environmental to implement a GreenLink pilot project in Bellingham,Washington; and the success of that project allowed our team to receive two additional grants to bring this approach to Port Angeles; • The GreenLink method emphasizes collaboration between government agencies,between professional disciplines, and amongst community stakeholders; while also prioritizing projects with multiple benefits in addition to water quality(e.g.,habitat,mobility, community health, etc.); it takes a holistic view of watershed planning that promotes inclusion, coordination,and a broad definition of the watershed Background • Initially, Futurewise was in conversation with the City of Sequim to apply for a Puget Sound Partnership (PSP) Near Term Action (NTA) grant to implement a GreenLink project there.' Futurewise received the first$248,000 NTA in 2018 but Sequim decided that the timing was not right for them to take on a project like this. Partners in Sequim suggested that we reach out to Port Angeles,and soon afterwards our team connected with Nathan West. He and Mayor Sissi Bruch PSP is a Washington-based,quasi-governmental agency that manages all of the Puget Sound recovery research and funding and NTAs are their prioritization process for channeling federal funds into local-level projects. p-4e'�-bl FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2621 found that the project aligned well with the City's green stormwater infrastructure vision and goals. • After partnering with the City of Port Angeles, Futurewise applied for and received a second NTA (also for$248,000) and combined the two grants into"Phase 1" and"Phase 2" of the same GreenLink project. Futurewise chose to divide the two phases into the following priorities: o Phase 1 will develop an integrated network of implementable green infrastructure project recommendations to improve water quality,habitat,and community assets; o Phase 2 will support the development and implementation of projects and programs identified in Phase 1. Project Team&Key Partners Futurewise is excited to support the City of Port Angeles'green infrastructure goals: • Futurewise is an environmental non-profit organization that specializes in land use policy in Washington State; • Herrera Environmental provides watershed planning and analysis services to the project; • The project's governmental partners include the City of Port Angeles,Clallam County,Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe,and the Washington State Department of Ecology; and several Port Angeles-based community organizations are also helping to guide the project; • The following government bodies and community organizations are represented by the GreenLink Advisory Committee (GLAC) members: o City of Port Angeles o Clallam County o Clallam Marine Resources Committee o Feiro Marine Life Center o Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe o Olympic National Park o Puget Sound Streamkeepers (Clallam County) o Washington Sea Grant Phase 1 (July 2018-April 2020) The goal of Phase 1 is to develop a list of implementable green infrastructure projects and/or policies that will improve Port Angeles water quality,habitat,and community assets: • The GreenLink Advisory Committee is made up of local stakeholders and technical advisors who are deeply integrated throughout the process.The GLAC members provide local expertise concerning the watersheds'conditions, opportunities for public engagement,and potential projects and/or policies that should be evaluated.The GLAC first met in November 2018 and meets quarterly throughout the project; • Herrera,the project technical consultant,will create a watershed condition analysis of the Port Angeles watershed.This will involve collecting watershed data using criteria within the three categories of water quality,habitat,and community assets and creating a catalog of maps of the An FAN-OPT FrrOee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2M existing Port Angeles watershed conditions using these criteria. Herrera will analyze GIS data to develop"heat maps"that can help identify areas within the watershed that would benefit from green infrastructure projects; • Futurewise will engage in broad community engagement to inform Port Angeles and Clallam County residents about GreenLink as well as to collect community knowledge local definitions of community assets,creek conditions and uses,and preferences for potential projects. Potential outreach opportunities involve: o Tabling at community events like the Port Angeles Farmers Market,the Clallam County Fair,or the Dungeness Crab&Seafood Festival; o A Watershed Tour in late summer or early fall 2019 for the GreenLink Advisory Committee and other interested members of the public to take a tour of some of the areas highlighted by the heat map analysis to help narrow down potential project sites and brainstorm project ideas; o Presenting at meetings of relevant or interest community organizations. • Phase 1 will end with the development of a list of priority projects. Based on the"heat map" analysis and community feedback, Futurewise, Herrera, and the GLAC will develop a set of potential green infrastructure projects that meet project goals. Potential projects will be sourced from the City's existing plans (e.g., capital improvement plans) as well as from feedback provided by project stakeholders and members of the Port Angeles general public. From this list,the GLAC will narrow down to a"short list"of projects that community members and decision-makers can use to apply for implementation funding. Phase 2 (May 2020-June 2021) The plan for Phase 2 is highly dependent on what the heat map analysis and subsequent list of priority projects developed during Phase 1. Phase 2 will be focused on advancing the project or policy list generated from Phase 1. Further details will be shared with the Council as Phase 1 nears completion. FAN-Pill FrrOee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 262T L J 13 Ic 9UT19MUL 13MO-Id NUMU99-19 :v X!PU5Mfv p-arg1 - 78 e FrOeFFink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2022 Appendix B: Frequently Used Terms Community Benefits or Community Co-Benefits This encompases any project benefits that are outside of what has traditionally been considered to be environmental benefits.This can include community health (improved air quality,improved community physical health from access to trails,improved community mental health from access to green spaces) or community assets (trail systems,green spaces, etc.). Green Infrastructure Green infrastructure is a series of management practices that encourage viable ecological functions in developed areas,primarily as a way of managing stormwater. Green infrastructure reduces the volume of stormwater flows and can reduce water quality contaminated from flooding, combined sewer overflows, and stormwater runoff. Green infrastructure,however, can provide other ecological,economic,and social benefits and is an innovative solution for providing habitat viability,climate change preparation,and safe streets. Heat Map A"heat map"is a graphical representation of several layers of watershed condition criteria displayed in a single map.These criteria are combined into a single color spectrum that indicate the range of low-to high-levels of negative impact,typically with green representing"low"and red representing"high".The purpose of a"heat map"is to show a lot of spatial information in a way doesn't distract the viewer. Stormwater Stormwater is rainwater or snowmelt that runs over surfaces such as lawns, roofs,streets,and parking lots. In most areas of Port Angeles, stormwater is collected in catch basins located in paved areas. Stormwater flows from the catch basins into underground pipes that carry it a nearby body of water, such as a creek or the harbor. Stormwater is also transported in roadside ditches or culverts,and in some areas may enter the combined sewer system and be transported to the wastewater treatment plant. Watershed A watershed is the area of land where all of the water that drains off of it goes into the same place.The Port Angeles watershed is just under 27,000 acres in size and includes the city of Port Angeles, part of Clallam county, and a small part of Olympic National Park. p-Ae� A11 FrrOee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2P Appendix C: Further Resources To learn more about Futurewise,please see our website: www.futurewise.org To see an example of a previous GreenLink project, please check out the report from GreenLink Bellingham: httl2://www.futurewise.org/resources/rel2orts/greenlink-bellingham To learn more about stormwater in Port Angeles,please see your City of Port Angeles Public Works Stormwater Utility website: https://wa-portangeles.civicplus.com/444/Stormwater-Resources For more on green infrastructure,please see the EPA's website on green infrastructure: htti3s://www.ei3a.gov/green-infrastructure. Of particular interest to this project may be the 2014 EPA report on enhancing sustainable communities through green infrastructure: htti)s://www.ei)a.2ov/smart2rowth/enhanciniz-sustainable-communities-green-infrastructure or the 2014 EPA report on coastal stormwater management through green infrastructure: htti)s://www.ei)a.2ov/nei)/coastal-stormwater-management-through-green-infrastructure-handbook-mu nicipalities-0. An FAN-A?i FrrOee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2P29 H E � . TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Date: 10/06/2020 To: Tiernan Martin, Futurewise From: Jennifer Schmidt and Joy Michaud, Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. Subject: GreenLink Port Angeles—Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping CONTENTS 1. Introduction..............................................................................................................................................................3 1.1. Purpose and Background...........................................................................................................................3 1.2. Study Area .......................................................................................................................................................3 1.3. Approach Overview......................................................................................................................................6 2. Methods.....................................................................................................................................................................6 2.1. Convene Technical Advisory Committee and Determine Analysis Categories......................6 2.2. Compile Existing Data .................................................................................................................................7 2.3. Create "Lay of the Land" Map Catalog..................................................................................................7 2.4. Identify and Address Data Gaps..............................................................................................................7 2.5. Conduct Heat Map Analysis......................................................................................................................8 2.5.1. Water Quality Analysis...........................................................................................................9 2.5.2. Community Assets Analysis................................................................................................17 2.5.3. Habitat Analysis......................................................................................................................21 2.5.4. Cumulative Watershed Function Map............................................................................22 2.6. Next Steps......................................................................................................................................................25 2.7. NPDES Permit Support..............................................................................................................................25 0 0 O 0 N O N Q (6 (6 Y C N N CD O O O O in O r O VI 2200 Sixth Avenue I Suite 1100 I Seattle,Washington 98121 I p 206 441 9080 I f 206 441 9108 0 E Q 5 �SEATTLE,WA I PORTLAND,OR I MISSOULA,MT I OLYMPIA,WA I BELLINGHAM,WA FAe� 5°I Frroee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2921 Technical Memorandum(continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping APPENDICES Appendix A Spatial Data Catalog Appendix B "Lay of the Land" Map Catalog Appendix C Water Quality Metrics Correlation Matrix Appendix D Data Gaps TABLES Table 1. Water Quality Criteria and Scoring Used to Create Heat Maps.............................................13 Table 2. Community Assets Criteria and Scoring Used to Create Heat Maps ...................................21 Table A-1.GIS Water Quality Datasets..................................................................................................................29 TableA-2.GIS Habitat Datasets...............................................................................................................................30 Table A-3.GIS Community Assets Datasets. .......................................................................................................31 Table A-4.GIS Feasibility Datasets..........................................................................................................................32 Table C-1.Water Quality Correlation Matrix.......................................................................................................37 Table D-1.Resolutions to Identified Data Gaps.................................................................................................41 FIGURES Figure 1. GreenLink Port Angeles Study Area....................................................................................................5 Figure 2. GreenLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Planning Process Overview...................................................6 Figure 3. GreenLink Port Angeles Water Quality Heat Map (Five Metrics)...........................................11 Figure 4. Final GreenLink Port Angeles Water Quality Heat Map. ...........................................................15 Figure S. GreenLink Port Angeles Community Assets Heat Map. ............................................................19 Figure 6. GreenLink Port Angeles Cumulative Watershed Function Map.............................................23 k .Hr. October 2020 22 22 p-ae� 171 FrroeRiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2 2� Technical Memorandum(continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND GreenLink Port Angeles (GreenLink) is a systematic planning process that aims to maximize the value of investments made in stormwater management by implementing green infrastructure projects in locations where multiple co-benefits can be achieved. Green infrastructure encourages viable ecological functions in developed areas. It is often implemented as stormwater management strategies—which can both reduce stormwater volume and reduce pollutant loading. However, with planning, green infrastructure can also provide social, economic, and ecological benefits beyond stormwater management. These include improving habitat viability, building safe streets and communities, providing public amenities, and supporting climate change preparedness. The GreenLink framework identifies high-value green infrastructure projects in a watershed by evaluating ecological conditions in parallel with community and infrastructure needs. This information is then used to develop a prioritized project list that focuses on opportunities that provide multiple benefits. Depending upon the preferences of the community, the selected project may provide a range of benefits, such as improved water quality, enhanced mobility, habitat improvement, and community quality of life. This integrated approach to project planning results in more immediate and measurable ecosystem benefits and a more integrated and resilient network of green infrastructure. In addition, it promotes regional collaboration among stakeholders for effective long-term watershed management. Most of the watersheds flowing through Port Angeles have water quality problems due to existing and past ecological disruptions such as development, logging, and other human activities. The project and policy recommendations that come out of this project may be used to help mitigate some of these impacts while providing ecological, economic, and social benefits. The information and process developed is also expected to be useful to the City for meeting some of their municipal stormwater permit requirements, as described in a Section 2.7 at the end of this Technical Memorandum. This project builds upon the pilot GreenLink Bellingham framework developed in 2016 and has been tailored to meet Port Angeles stormwater, planning, public health, and recreation priorities. 1.2. STUDY AREA The City of Port Angeles is located in Clallam County on the northern edge of the Olympic Peninsula along the shore of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Five primary creeks flow into Port Angeles: Dry Creek, Tumwater Creek, Valley Creek, Peabody Creek, and Ennis Creek. All five creeks are located in Watershed Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 18just east of the Elwha River watershed and are independent drainages flowing into the Port Angeles harbor. The area H[n¢Car October 2020 3 p-a5e'V- l FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2PR Technical Memorandum(continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping draining directly to Port Angeles harbor that is not a part of any of these creeks is also highlighted in Figure 1. The original study area outlined in the grant proposal for this project included three watersheds: Peabody, Valley, and Tumwater Creeks. Based on input from the project Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), the study area was expanded to include the two other major creeks flowing into Port Angeles, Dry Creek and Ennis Creek. This project focuses specifically on the portions of the five creek watersheds that are within the Port Angeles city limits. Because areas draining directly to Port Angeles harbor are covered under other municipal stormwater planning efforts, they are not a specific focus of this project. qq HE�¢Car OOcQcttober 2020 44 74e'Hel FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2(722 Strait of Juan de Fuca'` Port Angeles Harbor y • u f w /' 101 ° - Y Esri, Garmin, GEBCO, NOAA NGDC,and other contributors,See dataset specific metadata. Legend Figure 1. Watershed Boundary Areas Draining to GreenLink Port Angeles Study Area. Dry Creek , i L' Port Angeles Harbor Ennis Creek Study Focus Area N Highway 0 3,500 7,000 14,000 Peabody Creek Feet � -� Port Angeles City Limits Tumwater Creek � H E R R E RA i� Olympic National Park Qpv��1r P` OZ2 _ •,or ing\vi. ' p- e A- 9�l Greentink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2 2 Technical Memorandum(continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping 1.3. APPROACH OVERVIEW A holistic and data-driven approach was used to evaluate the existing conditions of the Port Angeles watersheds. The goal of this process was to implement a quantitative framework that integrates spatial datasets with information from previous studies and stakeholder input into a series of "heat maps" that identify areas with both the highest need and greatest opportunity for green infrastructure. Figure 2 provides a road map for this process; each step is described in detail in the following Methods section. This figure shows the steps for the first phase of this project only. Next steps, including how the results of this analysis will be used, are discussed in Section 2.6 at the end of this document. {•o-:Ivr•wl T�:Iwa:.d �uawml Tnasrrm:.d AIM srlrY I � g1NaniF 4--lb {yx,ri ntil liv ITAC i E%J%11110 Q.p,F ! �19�I�`��i t I��{•I r4nr��}.� Dt'I�'dIP9Al1� CRU�ItN'1�7�'ll i!!'I11 Yi.Ip1i' pmlysil lhn Lpnd-Mnp A C i tusunaz. fia�WU1J Gw7u 44Pa 4'�Ia 1 ^,A K�; i. Figure 2. GreenLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Planning Process Overview. 2. METHODS 2.1. CONVENE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND DETERMINE ANALYSIS CATEGORIES In addition to providing a unique mapping strategy to identify priority projects, the GreenLink framework also emphasizes deep community engagement. As a first step in this process a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was formed that is comprised of local stakeholders, technical advisors, and government officials. The TAC provided guidance on key project decisions and reviewed project deliverables. The GreenLink process is iterative, and the TAC was convened frequently to help identify data sources and fill data gaps, vet analysis results, and refine the project approach as needed. To help focus the subsequent data collection and mapping efforts on multi-benefit project identification, the TAC met to review a list of potential analysis categories, including those selected for the GreenLink Bellingham project. After discussion of the strengths and weaknesses ,V H[RRQ October 2020 6 PINS0MV1 FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2M Technical Memorandum(continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping of each category and an assessment of overall project goals, the TAC identified the following three priority categories: • Water Quality • Community Assets • Habitat 2.2. COMPILE EXISTING DATA Spatial datasets and resources from previous studies were compiled from local, state, and federal agencies for each analysis category. Datasets related to project implementation feasibility such as soil classifications and land ownership were also compiled, as well as the location of planned capital projects and habitat restoration efforts. Data collection efforts involved online searches, e-mails, and phone calls. More than 75 datasets were gathered and compiled into a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) geodatabase. A complete list of the GIS datasets obtained for this project is provided in Appendix A. 2.3. CREATE "LAY OF THE LAND" MAP CATALOG Having a comprehensive understanding of watershed existing conditions is an important step in the GreenLink planning process. To support this effort, a "Lay of the Land" map catalog was created documenting existing conditions by analysis category within the five Port Angeles watersheds. These maps will be reviewed along with feasibility datasets in subsequent steps to determine where green infrastructure project implementation is possible. The "Lay of the Land" map catalog is provided as Appendix B. 2.4. IDENTIFY AND ADDRESS DATA MAPS The spatial datasets documented in Appendix A were assessed for data quality, including completeness, accuracy, and resolution. Data gaps identified included: • Incomplete datasets that were either missing key features or that did not cover the entire study area (such as trail locations) • Datasets identified as being important for analysis that were not readily available (such as outdoor gathering places) Since the TAC was comprised of people who were very familiar with the area and had broad spectrum of expertise, many key data gaps were filled by soliciting input from the TAC on H[n¢Car October 2020 7 f-a5e'A-PFl FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2P27 Technical Memorandum(continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping additional data sources to augment missing information. Another successful approach that was used to fill data gaps was crowdsourcing through interactive online web maps when possible (such as creek access points) and through extensive public outreach conducted by Futurewise. Where these approaches were not successful in filling an identified data gap, a replacement dataset that closely represented the underlying process of the original dataset was used. 2.5. CONDUCT HEAT MAP ANALYSIS After the "Lay of the Land" maps were completed, a series of GIS "heat mapping" analyses were completed to facilitate the identification and prioritization of projects in the Port Angeles watersheds. Heat mapping is a quantitative analysis approach that applies scoring to individual datasets and then overlays them to create maps on a low-to-high color ramp based on the combined scores. This process involved the following key steps: 1. Grouping datasets and identifying representative watershed health metrics by analysis category (water quality, community assets, and habitat). 2. Developing scoring criteria for each metric to represent the overall impact of the metric on the broader analysis category. 3. Implementing and overlaying the scoring criteria to create individual "heat maps" for each category. Scoring was applied by creating a grid of the study area, assigning values to each cell, and then adding the cells together to get a combined score at that location. The graphic below illustrates this process. Datisell 3rl Oa 1:pse k-E2 &I 1d sei$3 1 U U 2IJ a 2 5 $ 0 0 2 + 1 0 3 6 3 1 5 3 1 4 3 1 3 �r 4. Combining the individual maps into an overall cumulative watershed function map that synthesizes the data into one overall low-to-high scored map that can be used to identify candidate locations for green infrastructure projects with multiple benefits. Developing the criteria and scoring for each heat map was iterative and was done in close collaboration with the TAC. The following discussion questions were used to help guide this process: • What question(s) is this category attempting to answer? • How will this information be used to assess potential green infrastructure project opportunities? H[n¢Car October 2020 8 p-a5e'Abl FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2M Technical Memorandum(continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping • What potential metrics best represent this category? • What scoring should be applied to each metric? The following sections describe how this approach was implemented for each category. 2.5.1. WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS The purpose of the water quality heat mapping analysis was to answer the following questions: • How impaired is water quality in Port Angeles watersheds? • Based on current water quality conditions, what areas in the Port Angeles watershed have the best potential for restoration and/or conservation? Rather than focusing on the areas with the worst water quality where it may be difficult and expensive to see much improvement, this information will be used to highlight areas where water quality is already good (conservation) or where it is slightly impaired and cost-effective green infrastructure improvements are feasible (restoration). METRICS The water quality metrics apply to the five creek watersheds only and do not include areas draining directly to Port Angeles harbor. With the exception of the Clallam County Water Quality Index (WQI) Scores, all water quality metrics were analyzed for the contributing area draining to each 1/10th of a river mile segment. CLALLAM COUNTY WATER QUALITY INDEX(WQI)SCORES The Clallam County WQI rates the quality of waterbodies with respect to human health and fish and wildlife habitat needs. The CCWQI rating scale spans from Critically Impaired to Healthy based on an aggregation of several water quality parameters at each monitoring stations. Data from 2001 to 2011 was downloaded from the Clallam County StreamKeepers website in text file format and the locations were mapped using latitude and longitude coordinates. The upstream contributing area to each monitoring station was delineated and the WQI score was assigned to that entire area. In cases where more than one score was present for a monitoring station, the most recent score was used. 303(D)STREAM LISTINGS 303(d) listed waterbodies have been identified by the EPA as impaired or threatened because they do not meet water quality standards for one or more key parameters. HCn¢Car October 2020 9 p-a5e'lbl FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February A Technical Memorandum(continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping IMPERVIOUS AREA As impervious area increases, the volume of polluted stormwater runoff that drains to local waterbodies also increases. STREAM CROSSINGS The number of stream crossings was used as an indirect measure of the influence of road corridors. Road corridors are associated with increased stormwater runoff and increased discharge of pollutants. OUTFALLS AND DISCHARGE POINTS The density of stormwater outfalls draining to each 1/10th of a river mile of major streams is an indicator of the volume of polluted water that may enter the stream at a given segment. SCORING The following scoring criteria was applied to each metric and overlaid to create a cumulative Water Quality heat map (Figure 3). HCn¢Car OOcpcttober 2020 10 Ta5e'A-P4?l FrOeFFInk Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February A41 7 1 Port Angeles O Harbor i o i i 0 a — 000 d — I _— d � I o O Legend Figure 3. Green Link Port Angeles Water Quality Water Quality Heat Map Score Highway Heat Map(Five Metrics). - Highly Impaired(<7) O Watershed Boundary 2 N Impaired(7 to 9) Stream Moderately Impaired(10 to 11) L- port Angeles City Limits 0 2,500 5,000 10,000 Feet Mildly Impaired(11 to 12) H C R R C RA Not Impaired(13 to 15) Anr TA A-Aj FrroegFiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February2021 Technical Memorandum (continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping Table 1. Water Quality Criteria and Scoring Used to Create Heat Maps. Metric Criteria Scoring Dataset Clallam County Water What is the WQI score 1 = Critically Impaired Clallam County 11 Quality Index(WQUI) associated with the nearest 2 = Highly Impaired Stream Keepers (2011) Scores downstream monitoring 3 = Impaired station for each 1/10th mile watershed 4 = Compromised section? 5 = Healthy 303(d) Stream Listings Does watershed section Yes = 0 303(D) Stream Listing (based on 1/10th mile No - 1 (2012)from Department increments)drain to a of Ecology 303(d) listed stream? Impervious Area What percentage of the 1 = > 50% National Land Cover watershed section is 2 = 35 to 50% Dataset(NLCD) Percent impervious area? 3 = 25 to 35% Imperviousness Surface 4 = 10 to 25% (2016) 5 = < 10% Stream Crossings How many locations where 1 = 8 + Generated by roads cross the stream are 2 = 5 to 7 consultant team using located in the watershed 3 = 3 to 4 streams and roadway section? data 4 = 1to2 5 = 0 Outfall and Discharge How many outfalls and 1 = 10 + Port Angeles Outfalls Points discharge points are 2 - 7 to 9 and Discharge Points located in the watershed 3 - 3 to 6 section? 4 = 1to2 5 = 0 Because several of these datasets represent the same underlying watershed processes (both impervious area and outfall density may represent development density for example), a correlation analysis was run using the scored data values for each 1/10th of a river mile drainage area to determine whether statistically significant correlations exist between the proposed metrics. The results of this analysis indicated that the number of outfalls and discharge points was significantly correlated with all four other metrics. In addition, the factors that cause a stream to be listed as 303(d) are also considered in the WQI scores (fecal coliform, temperature, etc.). These two metrics were therefore removed from the analysis. Based on input from the TAC, it was also determined that the spatial and temporal extent of the WQI data was not sufficient to support this analysis and it was also removed from consideration. The final water quality heat map based on two metrics (impervious area and number of upstream stream crossings) is shown in Figure 4. H[n¢Car OOccttober 2020 113 f-a5 3 e'A-P6?l FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2�2'1 7� 1 l Port Angeles Harbor I q i -- -I -a 101 = — � a I o 0 o � I � ' I o 0 a E'rl {4 berm em Ae a Legend Figure 4. Water Quality Heat Map Score Highway Final GreenLink Port Angeles Water Quality Heat Map. Highly Impaired(4) O Watershed Boundary N Impaired(5 to 6) Stream Moderately Impaired(7 to S) -,port Angeles City Limits 0 2,500 5,000 10,000 Feet Midly Impaired(9) Not Impaired(10) H r:?F..I p A Anr FAeia-9$1 FrrOee2ntink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2 R Technical Memorandum(continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping 2.5.2. COMMUNITY ASSETS ANALYSIS The purpose of the community assets heat mapping analysis was to answer the following questions: • Where are opportunities to enhance community assets? • Are there opportunities to connect existing mobility features such as sidewalks and trails or outdoor gathering places? • Where can projects be implemented to improve access to and between green spaces? METRICS The following metrics were used to analyze the availability of community assets within Port Angeles. Each metric was calculated using a 10-minute walkshed from each data point. PROXIMITY TO OUTDOOR GATHERING SPACES Outdoor gathering spaces are important for developing a sense of community and often serve as hubs for other recreation activities. The locations of outdoor gathering spaces were provided by the TAC on a project web map and through public outreach conducted by Futurewise. PROXIMITY TO CREEK ACCESS POINTS The creeks in Port Angeles are significant community assets and provide opportunity for recreation and community gathering. The locations of creek access points were provided by the TAC on a project web map and through public outreach conducted by Futurewise. PROXIMITY TO PARKS OR OPEN SPACES Access to parks and open space provide is important for providing opportunities for healthy activities to community members. PROXIMITYTo TRAILS Access to trails is important for providing opportunities for healthy activities to community members. SCORING The following scoring criteria was applied to each metric and overlaid to create a cumulative Community Assets heat map (Figure 5). Because community assets are intended to serve the H[n¢Car OOcpcttober 2020 117a7 p-a5e'A-Pee FrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2U22 Technical Memorandum(continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping residents of Port Angeles and surrounding communities, this analysis was conducted within the Port Angeles city limits only and excluded the upper portions of the watersheds. HE�¢Car October 2020 18 fla5eil&l FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2?21 a ' _ Port Angeles Harbor W; i f f c I I - � I I I 7J 0 Q E-ri D Farm ervi A a Legend Figure 5. Community Assets Heat Map Scoring GreenLink Port Angeles Community (#of Assets within a 10-minute walk) Asets Heat Map. No assets Highway N 1 asset O Watershed Boundary 2 assets Stream 0 2,000 4,000 8,000 Feet 3 assets L Port Angeles City Limits V�'u hCc' FJ,r F`F RA 4 assets Anr FAeia-PCP FrrOee2ntink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2 2� Technical Memorandum (continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping Table 2. Community Assets Criteria and Scoring Used to Create Heat Maps Metric Criteria Scoring Dataset Proximity to Outdoor Is the location within a 10- Yes = 0 Outdoor Gathering Gathering Places minute walk of an outdoor No = 1 Places (mapped by TAC gathering space? and consultant team) Proximity to Creek Access Is the location within a 10- Yes = 0 Creek Access Points Points minute walk of a creek No = 1 (mapped by TAC and accesspoint? consultant team) Proximity to Parks or Open Is the location within a 10- Yes = 0 Port Angeles and Space minute walk of a park or No = 1 Clallam County Parks open s ace? Proximity to Trails Is the location within a 10- Yes = 0 Port Angeles City Trails minute walk of a park or No = 1 open s ace? 2.5.3. HABITAT ANALYSIS The purpose of the habitat analysis was to answer the following questions: • Based on existing habitat conditions, where are opportunities for habitat protection or enhancement? • Where are critical areas located that may increase the permitting complexity of proposed GreenLink projects? Although the GreenLink framework is not specifically focused on improving habitat, it was recognized that there may be opportunities to connect fragmented habitat through a GreenLink project. Information on existing habitat quality can also be used to refer potential projects to partner organizations to prioritize in their planning efforts. It is also important to understand where proposed projects may negatively impact habitat in good condition. METRICS Assessing existing habitat conditions is complex and different criteria may be important to consider depending on the specific aquatic or terrestrial environments being considered. Because habitat considerations are not necessarily additive in the same way that datasets related to water quality and access to community assets are, it was determined through collaboration with the TAC that it did not make sense to develop quantitative habitat heat mapping scoring. Instead, the habitat "Lay of the Land" maps should be used in combination with the other heat mapping to assess project opportunities on a site-by-site basis. The metrics described below can be used to a) protect sensitive habitat and avoid complex permitting when siting green infrastructure projects and/or b) assess opportunities to connect and or enhance fragmented habitat. H[n¢Car October 2020 21 f-a5e'A-PFl FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2?27 Technical Memorandum(continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping OPPORTUNITIES FOR HABITAT ENHANCEMENT Several datasets were considered for identifying potential areas for habitat enhancement, including tree canopy cover, fragmented habitat patches, and the least-cost paths between the habitat fragments. The Habitat Opportunities maps are included in the Appendix B "Lay of the Land" catalog. HABITAT CONSTRAINTS Habitat constraints like critical areas can significantly impact permitting complexity. Critical areas considered in this analysis include fish-bearing streams, wetland presence, and critical habitat for threatened and endangered species. The Habitat Constraints maps are included in the Appendix B "Lay of the Land" catalog. 2.5.4. CUMULATIVE WATERSHED FUNCTION MAP The Community Assets and Water Quality heat maps were overlaid to create a cumulative Watershed Function heat map (Figure 6). This cumulative map covers the areas of overlap between these two maps: creek watersheds within the Port Angeles city limits. The habitat maps should be interpreted side-by-side with this map to identify possible areas of synergy with habitat opportunities and to avoid habitat constraints like wetlands and critical habitat. H[n¢Car October 2020 22 f-a5VA-P21 FrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2?21 e 101—,,•——_ - - - E--ri DD' Fai(rn e�rvi A e'd Legend Figure 6. Watershed Function Score GreenLink Port Angeles Cumulative (Combined Opportunity and Need) Watershed Function Map. High Highway N Moderate-High O Watershed Boundary Moderate Stream 0 2,000 4,000 8,000 Feet Low L Port Angeles City Limits Very Low Anr FA A-PY1 Frree2ntink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2821 Technical Memorandum(continued) GreenLink Port Angeles-Watershed Characterization and Heat Mapping 2.6. NEXT STEPS The information created in the analysis and a desktop assessment of other data (e.g., stormwater nodes, street widths, public property and other features of the landscape and infrastructure) will be used to identify opportunity areas. For example, an area on the cumulative watershed function showing up as "hot" due to having a high potential for water quality improvement and a high need for better access to community assets would be reviewed further along with the habitat opportunities and constraints maps to determine if project siting is feasible. A field survey will follow and the outcome will be a list of conceptual projects that will be reviewed with the TAC to refine and prioritize. Example prioritization criteria is expected to include: • Expected long term ecological lift • Ancillary benefits • Cost relative to performance • Community support • Likelihood of being implemented within 5 years 2.7. NP®ES PERMIT SUPPORT Although the GreenLink project is not directly related to the City's NPDES permit requirements, much of the information developed will help the City meet their permit needs. The new (2019) permit requires that each community undertake a watershed planning process to select a priority watershed for the focus of their stormwater retrofit efforts. In addition to providing the City with basin delineation data (the first step in the NPDES watershed planning process), this project has resulted in the development of a GIS database that contains most of the key environmental data available, including some less typical information such as habitat fragmentation. This information can be directly applied to creating an inventory of the watersheds, characterizing them, and identifying impairments; all steps in the NPDES permit defined process. Although the objectives of the GreenLink project are different than those that would be applied to watershed prioritization for stormwater (as is the intent of the permit), the framework that was used for heat mapping could be modified and applied to meet a different objective and therefore assist with selection of a priority watershed. HCn¢Car October 2020 25 Fa5e'A-P4'1 FrrOeF ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febru ryl?29 APPENDIX A Spatial Data Catalog ftrij_�5°� rOee2n2nk Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr!aryI?21 Table A-1. GIS Water Quality Datasets. Dataset Source File Name Description Shellfish Closure Washington closurezones Zones identified as closed for shellfish Zones Department of harvesting. Data will be used as an Health (WDOH) indicator for poor marine water quality. 303(d) Listed Washington WQA303dCurrent Watercourses and water bodies listed as Water bodies Department of category 5(polluted waters) in a water Ecology quality assessment. Data will be used as an (WDOE) indicator for poor freshwater quality. B-IBI Sample Puget Sound BIBI_Sample_Locations Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity, locations Locations Stream Benthos of scores. Data is an indicator of stream health. Streams and Clallam County WTR_CO;WC-List Mapped streams and water bodies. Water bodies Puget Sound WDOE PSWSCWaterAssess_WRIA18 Analysis results from the Puget Sound Watershed Characterization Study(published in 2011). Characterization Data will be used as a base for prioritization Study(WRIA 18) of watersheds based on impairment and opportunities. Streamkeepers Clallam County CC_Streamkeepers_WQI Clallam County rating of stream water Water Quality quality calculated as an index of five water Index(WQI) quality parameters. Data will be used as an indicator for poor water quality. p-Aeil-Pee FrrOee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 29� Table A-2. GIS Habitat Datasets. Dataset Source File Name Description Priority Habitat Washington WDFW_PHS Fish and wildlife information and Species Department of mapped within the project area. (PHS) Fish and Wildlife This data will be used to identify (WDFW) infeasible areas for siting projects due to critical habitat considerations. Washington WDNR WHNP_Plant_Occurences Data for rare and national Natural heritage program plants, current Heritage and historical. Data will be used to Program identify habitat enhancement (WHNP) opportunities. Current and Historic Occurrences Wetlands City of Port PA-Wetlands; NWI_Wetlands Mapped wetland locations.This Angeles,WDFW data will be used to identify infeasible areas for siting projects due to critical habitat considerations. Fish Presence WDFW, WSDOT_Fish_Passage_Inventory; Fish presence and fish passage and Fish Washington WDFW-Fish-Passage-Barrier-Inventory barriers mapped within the Passage Department of project area. Data will be used to Inventory Transportation identify habitat enhancement (WSDOT) opportunities and/or infeasible areas for siting projects due to critical habitat considerations. Habitat Environmental Habitat-Fragments Habitat fragments are minimally Fragments Science Research disturbed natural areas that are Institute(ESRI) typically smaller than 100 acres in size and/or less than 200 meters wide and often highlight narrow riparian corridors. Data will be used to identify habitat enhancement opportunities. Tree Canopy USGS National NLCD_Canopy_Cover_2016 2016 raster dataset with 30-meter Cover Land Cover pixels showing percent tree Dataset(NLCD) canopy cover by pixel. Data will be used to identify areas where tree canopy is less dense, particularly in riparian corridors. p-argelU- J FrrOeRiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febrlary �2 Table A-3. GIS Community Assets Datasets. Dataset Source Description Description Parks Clallam County, CC_parks_co_st;City_Parks Park locations. Data will be used to Port Angeles highlight area with insufficient trail access. Trails Olympic National City_trails;CC_trails;ONP_trails; Existing and planned trail locations. Park,Clallam County, GPAAC_Trails Data will be used to highlight area Port Angeles with insufficient trail access. Creek GreenLink Port GPAAC_Creek_Access_Pts Locations where the public can access Access Angeles Advisory the creek.This data was Points Committee crowdsourced from the GreenLink Port Angeles Advisory Committee. Data will be used to highlight areas with insufficient or unsafe creek access. Outdoor GreenLink Port GPAAC_Outdoor_Gathering_Places Outdoor locations besides parks and Gathering Angeles Advisory trails where people might Places Committee congregate.This data was crowdsourced from the GreenLink Port Angeles Advisory Committee. Data will be used to highlight insufficiencies in access to recreational amenities. p-arge U8°1 FrrOeMiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix FebrlaryIU22 Table A-4. GIS Feasibility Datasets. Dataset Source File Name Scale Soils US Department of NRCS_soilsmu Soils data,to be used to identify project Agriculture opportunities and evaluate project feasibility. (USDA) Geology and Port Angeles; PA_gunitp;GWater Geology and groundwater information. Data Groundwater US Geological will be used to evaluate high-level feasibility of Service(USGS) identified projects. Land Washington CC_Parcels; This data will be used to identify public parcels Ownership Department of DNR_Major_Public_Lands that could provide opportunities for locating Natural Resources centralized projects. (WDNR), Clallam County, Port Angeles Wellhead WDOH WHPA_Tot_Assigned; Generalized areas of protection provided by the Protection WHPA_TOT_6mo; DOH for various travel times.This dataset will Areas WHPA_TOT_Syr; be used during project identification to identify WHPA_TOT_1yr; areas that may have special requirements for WHPA TOT 10 r treatment. Steep Slopes Clallam County, Steep-Slopes Steep slopes(1 S%or greater).This dataset will Port Angeles be used to assess the feasibility of project siting. Zoning Clallam County CC-Zoning Existing and planned layers to characterize past and present functions of city spaces.This dataset will be used for project area context and identifying ro'ect opportunities. Geologic Clallam County, CC_geohaz; Mapped geologic hazards.This dataset will be Hazards Port Angeles PA eo hazard used to assess the feasibility of project itin . Water and Port Angeles WWater;Water_Features; Water, sewer,and stormwater infrastructure Drainage Storm-Features system and facility files for the City.This dataset Infrastructure will be used to evaluate project opportunities and avoid utility conflicts. Other Utilities Port Angeles Electric;Misc_Utilities Electric and Miscellaneous Utilities.This data will be used to evaluate projects for utility conflicts. p-argelHY1 FrrOeRiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febrlary ?21 APPENDIX B "Lay of the Land" Map Catalog p-arge� 0�� FrrOee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'arylM xl� .q f .. 101 Ail- r. n , rs9 v �g 4, ah. w»+l"'05 gyp. � 7 1 -.10 ar -ervi A a Legend Lay of the Land Catalog _ (Dry Creek) Streamkeepers Water Quality Index(WQI)'L_ Port Angeles City Limits Area draining to Strait Water Quality 1:Critically Impaired ®Shellfish Closure Zones of Juan de Fuca N 2:Highly Impaired -303(d)Listings C3:Im aired 0 875 1,750 3,500 P O Stream Crossing Points Feet ® 4:Compromised r-1 Watershed boundary M 0 5:Healthy City Parks nr FA A-p1q, FrrOeMiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr!aryl?27 n, I e� h s r . r:. r - E-s�ri lr'�SD arm-ervi A a Legend Lay of the Land Catalog _ (Tumwater and Valley Creeks) Streamkeepers Water Quality Index(WQI)'L-_- Port Angeles City Limits Area draining to Strait Water Quality 1:Critically Impaired r2m Shellfish Closure Zones of Juan de Fuca N 2:Highly Impaired -303(d)Listings 3:Im aired 0 875 1,750 3,500 P O Stream Crossing Points Feet 4:Compromised r-1 Watershed boundary M 5:Healthy City Parks e�abi FrrOeMiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'ary19 p_arg 22 O '. C� 4 - 3 vd� � C} MvW i k I p�• . 9 .d� .° A A . mw w µ� Legend Lay of the Land Catalog _ (Peabody and Ennis Creeks) Stream L_—_�keepers Water Quality Index(WQI) Port Angeles City Limits Area draining to Strait Water Quality 1:Critically Impaired K2M Shellfish Closure Zones of Juan de Fuca N 2:Highly Impaired -303(d)Listings 3:Im aired 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 P O Stream Crossing Points Feet 4:Compromised O Watershed boundary I,,r:?F.i R M 5:Healthy City Parks nr FA A-P391 FrrOeMiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr!aryl?2� 1�1 i e fti E-ri -D arm-ervi A a Legend _-_ Lay of the Land Catalog L j® Outdoor Recreation Gathering Spot Port Angeles City Limits (Dry Creek) OWatershed boundary Community Assets Creek Access Point N City Trails(Port Angeles) City Parks Area draining to Strait Trails(Provided by Technical Advisory Committee) of Juan de Fuca 0 875 1,750 3,500 Existing trail(missing from map) Feet Planned trail Potential trail(already used) Anr TA U471 FrroMiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'aryII29 X a I � yt .ry ;a r aya y e � Y J fi4 w � rt 4 F i I aA ,q Legend _ Lay of the Land Catalog ® Outdoor Recreation Gathering Spot Port Angeles City Limits (Tumwater and Valley Creeks) OWatershed boundary Community Assets Creek Access Point N City Trails(Port Angeles) City Parks Area draining to Strait Trails(Provided by Technical Advisory Committee) of Juan de Fuca 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 ......• Existing trail(missing from map) Feet Planned trail r�'q I�r?F rR, Potential trail(already used) I --.e��-$5�� rreee2ntink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix FeblaryI121 ➢ Piz- n Ire Aw— Ennis Creek <l " 0 q v s a M r a q' Legend Lay of the Land Catalog ® L Outdoor Recreation Gathering Spot ] Port Angeles City Limits (Peabody and Ennis Creeks) OWatershed boundary Community Assets `J Creek Access Point N City Trails(Port Angeles) City Parks Area draining to Strait Trails(Provided by Technical Advisory Committee) of Juan de Fuca 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 ......• Existing trail(missing from map) Feet Planned trail Potential trail(already used) p_AVA-P671 FrroMiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'aryl(527 +a; i � w i 8y I • I f C -_—_________-_- — _ !o --------------- 101 -— -— d� f �'•. a I � + s � `ni a�• � v u YA r} a9 j Sri Legend Marbled Murrelet detection Lay of the Land Catalog Statewide Integrated Fish area(PHS) (Dry Creek) Fish Passage Barriers(WDFW) Distribution(SWIFD)(WDFW) Habitat Constraints Miscellaneous Barrier Bull Trout Spotted Owl buffer(PHS) Q Road Crossing """"""""""""""""' Chum Salmon Port Angeles City Limits Dam Chinook Salmon TTT Wetland(Clallam Coho Salmon O Watershed boundary 0 875 1,750 3,500Feet County) Steelhead Trout City Parks rPA Wetland(NWI) Straitr r Fr Cutthroat Trout Area draining to Qt �� 2 of Juan de Fuca f"A ��-8791 Frree2ntink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'aryW "2 ------------ -------------- r nFy, —_—— IJ I I f Y __— I I I u i I I a I I Legend Marbled Murrelet detection Lay of the Land Catalog (PHS) (Tumwater and Valley Creeks) Statewide Integrated Fish ®area Fish Passage Barriers(WDFW) Distribution(SWIFD)(WDFW) Habitat Constraints (Q Miscellaneous Barrier Bull Trout Spotted Owl buffer(PHS) Q Road Crossing Chum Salmon ,' Port Angeles City Limits Dam Chinook Salmon Wetland(Clallam Coho Salmon O Watershed boundary 0 1,000 2,000 4,000Feet County) Steelhead Trout City Parks u Or k I Wetland(NWI) Cutthroat Trout Area draining to Strait 'k Qpt 22 of Juan de Fuca a rx-. � 191 FrroMiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'aryIIJ22 O i . i I '' - `_ y O -___—_� — � — O ny.. O 4 i d ------- 0 a ---- o s O 10 JI . p - TM �. W o 40 r LL: I i 0 ,i F , .,., ..,. � s •`e .. --- �" ""'+', - '• ' ✓: Esrl USD a'rrn 5e'rvlce.Pl ena� Legend Marbled Murrelet detection Lay of the Land Catalog Statewide Integrated Fish area(PHS) (Peabody and Ennis Creeks) Fish Passage Barriers(WDFW) Distribution(SWIFD)(WDFW)Miscellaneous Barrier - Bull Trout Spotted Owl buffer(PHS) Habitat Constraints O Road Crossing Chum Salmon Port Angeles City Limits Dam Chinook Salmon Coho Salmon O Watershed boundary 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Wetland(Clallam Feet County) Steelhead Trout City Parks Wetland(NWI) ��` Cutthroat Trout Area draining to Strait Qpt 22 of Juan de Fuca Pang� AY, FrroMiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'aryll2-I u .i N1� I MI f I � t y p . a , 1 j I-- ----- -----—j — �. I 01 r i I . j —' ------------- ------------ ------------------ ------------------- I I ---- — a ---------, d, ly r, a I Y i rw Y Legend Lay of the Land Catalog Open Space Corridor Area draining to Strait (Dry Creek) (Clallam County) of Juan de Fuca Habitat Opportunities Habitat Fragment(ESRI) Port Angeles City Limits iii 0 875 1,750 3,500 OWatershed boundary Feet City Parks p-arge��-90�1 ree2ntink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February (12 C ij \�I I I el.. _ 1 j -------------- - - _--_---- -J I — I I I I I i r I I �• n 41 i I'�� i r y '_ �-• i&r-.r r• as .,�1 f. I A,. s e Ir 4 -s PL r r a wP nt` In E i l)- Legend Lay of the Land Catalog Open Space Corridor Area draining to Strait (Turnwater and Valley Creeks) (Clallam County) of Juan de Fuca Habitat Opportunities Habitat Fragment(ESRI) Port Angeles City Limits iii 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 OWatershed boundary Feet City Parks r4 r F p-arge��-91 1 rreee2ntink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr!al > 4 i i i ---------------- i --i -----i ¢ i i e L I I I I j I— � - I ) r�. I I ,• I-- .a n. r a uL id xyr � S• I A� w alr'x �I = m • �o) 9 Legend Lay of the Land Catalog Open Space Corridor Area draining to Strait (Peabody and Ennis Creeks) (Clallam County) of Juan de Fuca Habitat Opportunities Habitat Fragment(ESRI) L-— Port Angeles City Limits iii 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 OWatershed boundary Feet City Parks r4 r F TAe��-9 1 rreee!ntink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'aryl(522 APPENDIX C Water Quality Metrics Correlation Matrix fA -953,� rreeg?nk Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'aryld2l Table C-1. Water Quality Correlation Matrix. Water Stream Percent Quality Crossing Imperviou Outfall 303(d) Metric Mean Std.Dev. Index Count s Count Listings Water 4.20 0.82 1.00 -0.03 -0.36 -0.12 -0.26 Quality Index Stream 0.40 1.20 -0.03 1.00 0.07 0.13 -0.07 Crossing Count Percent 9.28 14.97 -0.36 0.07 1.00 0.37 0.24 Impervious Outfall 0.40 1.63 -0.12 0.13 0.37 1.00 0.14 Count 303(d) 0.50 0.50 -0.26 -0.07 0.24 0.14 1.00 Listin s Values shown are Pearson's R coefficients. Red correlations are statistically significant(a=0.05). Q HERRERA p-Ael�-9 1 Frroee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February a'L� APPENDIX D Data Gaps Qt hl��Sw�RA 2 2 p-arge��-9�5�� rrMiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'aryl�2� Table D-1. Resolutions to Identified Data Gaps. Category Metric Dataset Gap/Issue Action Taken Community Proximity to Port Angeles City Trails Incomplete TAC members added Assets Trails and outdated Supplemental data using interactive web ma Community Proximity to GPAAC_Outdoor_Gathering_Places No data TAC members identified Assets Outdoor available locations using interactive Gathering web map Places Community Proximity to GPAAC_Creek_Access_Pts No data TAC members identified Assets Creek available locations using interactive Access Point web ma Community Proximity to N/A Incomplete TAC determined it is not Assets Community feasible to develop a Gathering comprehensive dataset; Places metric replaced with Proximity to Outdoor Gathering Places HERRERA Qt p-a5e� VI Frroee2nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febru;ylp (D �7 7-1 ;Q R 2 > 2. q 8 U) U) 3 a 2 3 I z MP I > q 8 7 -n W 1 8 4 8 1 a- 2 2 2 2 2 2 c E 7w 12 N q;q 2 1 ,R, R i�5gR MH U� 8 2 1 E E TX-01-9574An1 FrOeMink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February m m 0 D z V/��n E O wP g C 3 " 3 D _—n ffH - 3 ago � 3g A5 A5 A5 A5 A5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 — _ - =92 g92 g92 g92 g92 g92 F4e��-9VI Frroemiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix FebrlaryIM2 Greenlink Port Angeles:Project Scoring Summary(DRAFT,scoring not finalized) PNaritizatian M.- unity Benefit Habitat Benefit er quality Implementetlan Map- opportunity Location/ C De amm IWq)Beneft -11,111ty umber Project Name reek Basin Opportunity type uriptiaNNotes otal Xore enefit erall Habitat Score WQOvesllXore erall Implementation T1- 8) erall Xo IMax=z1 IMax=z1 IMax=z1 jMax=z) Pmperty abng Tumwater Creek Regional F-Il y at jpo ziblyPbirtoric weigh rta" rext to aR-e 1 Pmperty T water Regional Facility on).Po [ial partnership with Port,high 0.5 A, Abng truck Road potential water quality benefit(SR 117),but mnoff is I-WSDOT road. W:)Iron Park Vicinity T Option for Green Xree[program 2 in residential area en Sheet water/Valley en Street Willson Park.Manage surface runoff wrth 1.g 1.0 1.0 1.G 6.8 bbreten[ion fadli[iez. 3 Elks Plsyfield S[ Option forGreen Xree[program in residential area 10 13 cinity Green Xreet water/Valley en reef n ar Elks Playfield.Managesurfarerunoffwith I.0 1.5 .68 biore[en[ion fadli[iez. ert flow off Pine St.into op field area behind Regional F-Il yat Lodge. en nalusageof- 0 Lodge I- Valley Regional Facility Ihorozezhoe pit),Infoimal creek xcessis typical of 1.A 0.7 13 "h and Pine) ztr t ends on Overt(Tumwater)and eart Valle St Pi f f Regional F-Ii ya[ ert low rom ne . m maininto ne 5 Lodge Parking Valley Regional Facility storm w 0,3 0.7 1.0 0.5 2.7 L. I--tt y m u nder Moose Lodge parking lot. F-IR ert flow off S Pine St.into regional"'Y in Valley 6 Regions ya[ Valley Regional Facility reek valley bottom.Cnnzider neighborhood D.e 0.3 1.7 DS 3.3 Valley Creek Trailhead disturbance. Daylight Valley Open creek channel and pedestrian access slurp reek and Add 7 Regions)S[ormws[er Valley reek Restoration Valley 6ee1, of ex-N Air- D.e 2.0 1.3 DS 6.6 [he ws[erffoM. acili[iez e Regional F-Il yat Add regional f-I.ty to manage rtormwater runoff 08 0] 13 00 28 er Valley Creek Valley Regional Facility from exirting 5 Pine St.ryt-Duffs))to Valley Creek . I-divert flow off Pine St.or Cheoy St.) z[End of Park rtsll Fikema or laiger[rea[meM-Ii ynear I WWQ Treatment Valley rtment Facility a rti�mountain bike trail access(along p,Ap-d D.e D.] D.] acility loop).Opportunity to formalize re¢eation and Option for Green Street Program along proposed O:Green Stacilities Peabody Valley Peabody hail loop.Combine with dete 10 abng Park Ave rt PA en Street and Ov"qu y[rea[men[in large surface parking 13 2.0 1.0 5.3 High Xhool lots by high-.1. Regional FadliN a[ roff from ONP a¢ezz mad intersection with 11 "not Park Peabody Regional Facility rt m 1.0 0.7 1.7 1.0 0.3 and Race S[ Park Ave(high traffic area,lots of rtopaM-go). 12:Add Water Quality Treatment a< Peabody Regional Facility Add waterg Ia yt-dint to ex-NWdiameter 12 suri Bddge Fbw Iazzumed fbw-.1)pipe at uMevebped lot. 0.5 0.] 1.3 1.0 3.5 C. of Pipe malize a¢ezz and zignage for trail segment a[ Peabody pposite side of Peabody St. 13 C.ty Hall Creek )also potential forgreen rtree[improvements abng 13 n-- Peabody Mobdl y Peabody St An uD project already planned forCity 0.8 0.D 131.0 3.1 Hall Parki�p Lot with potential b.-rtion o Filters abng Peabody St(Project-1,are still in development). Options for Green Sheet Program(indudes adjacent [alo�p S[ [ possibilities on Chamber St-,-).AI10 P-rtW 10 2nd StaM/o hS[ Peabody ^ ree det"""trertment opportunRy at large rtsdium 10 10 1.] 1.5 5.2 parking lot. Large open space used az parking lot.If Regional F-I.ty at t-,then could cap exirting site(mil and 15 reek/Rayonier Ennis Creek Regional Facility Inerl forcomhuRion of rtormws[er[rea[me CE 1.3 2.0 D.D 0.1 Mill Site wetland fx lRy and mute outfM Ennis Creek Doha)) Mo facility. Phased Ts.1 Expansion NA and Tsil Explorstion Other Programmatic Programmatic/Evaluation Phase 0" 0.0 1.0 2S Program NA G111n 1.5 5A 1 1 1 Ph It-14-1rk Other Programmatic Programmatic/Evaluation ase 1113Program[ Ph Park Habits[ Other Programmatic Programmatic/Evaluation ase NA Enhansmen[Pmgsm 1.0 1.0 0.3 2. 6.3 Programmatic/Evaluation Ph-.MoIA focuson Stop add.N amenities to bus rtopz.Potential rtormwrt NA Bmpro ,,m t, Other Mobdl y improvement opportunRy at Eunice St bus rtop mef 13D.7 1.0 DS II Program undeveloped bt.May apply more broadly a<other bus stops not visited.Note:bus mutes are subject to change. p-arge�U11 FrrOeMiink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix FebrlarylM c a Fit v7 (.n t' ° gr ., IM � Q �,o �, — r -,� h 0 �rn _ G 0 ,gyp, V _ � �_ � � : 1 2 � x b^.: lio LO r eo b :, D X 6 r' � u CL W fb r-I V cc M flDI I 87 x x �P. cG d M' E i , P 0 , aL5 � 7' aI � w 0 I I p-ge� 0��G gFnLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'aryl GREENLINK PORT ANGELES List of Project Alternatives Technical Advisory Group Meeting 10/12/2021 IW 4 01 � -• �w r wrw r .�. ¢ - m 4 ^* �Fk future i • -w ise j OVERVIEW: Project Timeline & Today's Goals Project Timeline: I*[hr°w(,)N A[iviSory Gr{ikip(I Jtir.�)f(;fine(i i L�."i1.i{�ilh�ir5�a k1�s�tifl�C�Y3diti�'rfYt Lyrics Hm. Mao An,itysi5 1 1 bL-i.1k)pmw11l W[F+l' L.I-A r}f 11rU1Ci:4 aiicu�w,?n& Prioriwarion of PrapLKlswilhTAG 1 Fi I t L I rr°w'o sir'Ienrn r•xFa nd,rd I;I ig.nnnnh Spe"gtk) Discuss on& PriorlEiaaLlon of IPray-e0 Akerrawees wi?7 TAG Z42a Advance selecxed project as far wward on-plen—U,* p 3rb14 �r F, III, a i n.r��l, rc{d M1�k11 r�r. inn, prelimir,,ary d-mgn, permicting bid rmckagey 2 Qpt 5 pp 22 TAeil&� rMn-ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'arylM-2 Today's Goals: 1. Review the project timeline 2. Introduce and discuss three project alternatives 3. Vote on project alternatives to assess TAG members' alignment of priorities 4. Determine next steps to advance one project alternative toward implementation Reminder: Project Prioritization Results from November 2020 TAG Meeting d 1 F 3 i i A ---------------------------- Ufa:9� Rego"5a,x1'I!Warr01 F.Krirro'il Mxird Tlrld i■l;arnmri Nell Te ni F,xW—Alkwi,Pcu* ral 10 G SIIeCar-d'rn*-rrnlra- <I+ s-3 a-,5 lPwkLvtatPrHighlk% C F.ogl-nna:F.ar..11hr of val"t:'rrrc+ rr.adhcad T 4 'r7A$s'Fuded r".wb Aw V T:#,&af ioill Far iPe 1A:(;dEVISlrtctdI"4',giMCI ttIr-M-Ce alh`_'t 9..140gkma Fscl4ty-al l aoer Varley C"k 'r1.11[W Nr4 k'i"Pf {wr`.al l > J E k i ayfAd'Yk Ml lr 01 ek?rl Srrbrl ;a 11 ai lnlrrstctaan 0 Palk Ni*arA Race St 1 , 7 Aiiigwyrail Fi M),Wi Irat46&Rdr Mug: iy Alww; T'IL*k%%.3d 7 p .... .., ...,w Lis I wwntril:Fra;qlan Q 1 R MgICCioIFaa.IF["y nl Mcx' ,ft I mhji,;nrnl rl'hhwdP'e*) 0 5 Qvgirnai� 11 Al Wixm I.-Op P.a:kmrlg I-I 0 15 grq�anll Fav,ky of Ennis Clcµk a P.ayww Mill San d � 12 Aad V"raar^r quarrrp Tmi ncnl al t auji"m fhop F194v rWRN;II F"IA 0 w.ab,-'ai En"rbrtrrwm Orarp.1M Revised Project Alternatives from October 2021 TAG Meeting • ALTERNATIVE A: Daylight Valley Creek and Create Watershed Master Plan • ALTERNATIVE B: Port Angeles High School Green Street & Stormwater Treatment Facility • ALTERNATIVE C: Peabody Creek Watershed with Advancement of Pilot Project(s) Qp 2 3 p-arge��- Os3�G�re2eink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr!ary " u�a 04 Tl� ,o r r A� y a A �y I i1 r k ib m e rYF ■ � '" ......Y�r ram, «. i„ ew.t r e_ H� AN soft Pa� W e - 0h Green ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2 F a� g, ,� t r iI eke', k rY d • ' � "'��. tl !: A« a «r .Y "�'1' 1 'W. w. w • n Y b� a a Id lei Oil Nk •. . moo+," �w. - �v .r"w ... I. t I ^-ice✓ � 7 • OL AINk 40 01 ir - F ri f .. 'C. Vie» !M'W'a, I •R\ A t 40� ! qrt4 +.. — ` •, •+!" "'`... .,dy✓^' _ w e �! '' "'� "a �^r.,_ .ray l"� + 1 w y L d �.t":..�"G�. y,.- �� .. ,. fir• 'j.. • + *°' a. ♦ A�'�ar", ' A: VALLEY CREEK MASTERPLAN Ae A reenLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix � ' dw 07 ALTERNATIVE A: Daylight Valley Creek and Create Watershed Master Plan Develop plans and obtain permits to daylight the lowest section of Valley Creek with pedestrian access and write a Watershed Master Plan that synthesizes existing plans and recommendations with the addition of GSI. Heat Map Analysis Results Community Benefit: 0 .8 / 2 Habitat Benefit: 2 .0 / 2 Water Quality Benefit: 1 .3 / 2 Implementation Feasibility: 0 .5 / 2 Total: 4.6 / 8 Opportunities • Unrealized potential prevents community benefit from important asset (financial, ecological, social) • Community has demonstrated ongoing enthusiasm for restoration and development of recreational potential (including GLAC members) • Builds on major VC restoration and planning work already completed - Phase 1 and 2 implemented, Phase 3 plans and permitting developed - City previously invested in property acquisition and zoning adjustments • Tribal cultural site not being managed accordingly - Degraded condition is EJ issue, redress long overdue - Elwha Tribe has demonstrated interest in restoring Valley Creek • ESA listed winter steelhead and other important species present including fall chum (under duress), coho, coastal cutthroat trout - Fish productivity potential may be higher than commonly An 2 6 F4e��- 0��G�re2eLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febrlaryl�2 understood Fish populations declining from cumulative impacts to all habitat, not just larger systems Fish barrier removal is high priority statewide City of PA will be required to address barrier culverts eventually • Complements downtown redevelopment efforts - Easily walkable from Feiro and ferry providing access to natural area - Improves pedestrian connectivity from downtown to ONP, ODT, and Peabody Creek - Current aesthetics detract from downtown experience and appeal, disincentive to visit and linger • Provides abundant educational opportunities - Spawning fish and wildlife viewing potential • Enhances fish and wildlife habitat quality and connectivity - Less degraded than Peabody Creek - Stormwater identified as a serious WQ problem in VC • Possibly less homeless use than Peabody Creek - Increased traffic and attention likely to dissuade homeless usage • Failing infrastructure needs attention (culverts, roads, septic, outfalls) - Aligns with City objectives and the City has expressed support - Location of multiple unfunded City capital facilities projects in poor condition - Addressing lower culvert increases likelihood of funding Phase 3 restoration • Possible option for GSI at outlet with estuary buffer enhancement Constraints • Current funding insufficient for daylighting project and Master Plan implementation 7 p-arge��- 0�/�G�re2eink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr!ary2 Future funding not assured and related projects have failed to progress May not be able to complete additional pilot project • Numerous large-scale infrastructure constraints: pavement, roads, buildings, businesses, septic, and utilities in riparian zone • Implementation of Master Plan projects will be complex and long term and there is no current mechanism for advancing vision - Major ecological restoration needs include: invasives, substrate, LWD, shade, riparian zone encroachments, WQ, and remenadering • Increased human use may disturb wildlife and neighbors • Perspective of neighboring residents and businesses unknown • Potential gentrification is equity issue • Not highest City priority An a 8 F4e��- 0��G�re2eLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix FebrlaryIZ w a. y„ t - a M r w - t • �y�M" nF '� r VA x AW �y y w y " aR x - .�a. a •. � �� ,� .. - �,p`>'" r.24P lam. �.,,* .Mr rr RAY/ y Ik 46 NO y r ylr� . �� • .�� „"�' ..„, � "ht. �� ` �� ran , r y w P w 4 " l „ r � w Ain x , . fl mm as w .,_ B: PA HIGH SCHOOL GREEN STREET p �ge A- 0� Green ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 21 °` '� d' �r 4 o-y +p i � x w v 1�ua' W'fl ;;8$ �,� " t� rs' v W A go :-,W` °1.. "' + y�^k! .* �,•y,.,q�c^ gr�,+ st+�',� • fl �� : *t,� �' r� ' „..'�z ':a �,M,+ *� � '„a ti�'x 7g� �;'g�' a ." !.-wy a" ��d.w ^";, �,�..'ro.. ��*�. xw4•�M�� .�,P�'y � y� .,.�"pe�,,.� �'° .rfi,K.r,+N'. .,'P x.,.�, d �,�aa''�r f� .� .'`1'�"� ax +. e w" Y ..n _ ` "� w b ""b h'" "sC t� e %+"" V7 r � � �d�.,� �y ,g ti G' s B: PA HIGH SCHOOL GREEN STREET ' " w. a Fage��- b 2GrreRn-ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2 w . ALTERNATIVE B: Port Angeles High School Green Street & Stormwater Facility Implementation of a green street program with detention and water quality treatment facilities in parking lots. Heat Map Analysis Results Community Benefit: 1 .3 / 2 Habitat Benefit: 1 .0 / 2 Water Quality Benefit: 2 .0 / 2 Implementation Feasibility: 1 .0 / 2 Total: 5.3 / 8 Opportunities • Stormwater identified as source of serious Peabody Creek WQ problems - Improvement of Peabody Creek WQ identified City goal - Concentrated, site-specific vehicle traffic impacts worthwhile target for SW facilities - Extensive impermeable paving prevents percolation and other ecological functions - Minimal vegetation results in a lack of shade, habitat, water retention, filtration, flow control, and aesthetic appeal • High traffic/visibility location with broad community reach and benefit - Aesthetics need improvement and projects would help City meet beautification objectives identified in Capital Facilities Plan - Relatively affordable interventions would provide noticeable improvements - Efforts would demonstrate concern for welfare and quality of life for youth - Unlikely to negatively affect neighbors An 5 11 F4e'A-Pi1 1 Urreeen-ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2 • Excellent educational potential - Helps fulfill NPDES permit outreach and educational requirements • Completion of multiple facilities/components possible (stated project goal) - Projects are scalable and implementation can be phased, • Disconnected, unsafe sidewalks discourage pedestrians and are not wheelchair accessible - Reinforces pedestrian connectivity between Valley and Peabody Creeks, loop trail is planned by the City (?) • Potential to create gathering space with multiple overlapping benefits - Suitable, unused (and unsightly) lot is owned by the school district • Likely fewer constraints than Alternative A • City goal to improve WQ in Peabody Creek and ranked highly by GLAC • Some potential for enhanced habitat connectivity • May be more closely aligned with original intent of the grant • Less immediate impacts on unhoused population Constraints • Feasibility and implementation barriers not fully known - Assessment required - Interest level of HS administration unknown - May include overflow parking and fire truck access needs • Permitting time frame may prevent timely completion • Funding limitations • Peabody Creek is most degraded system under consideration for projects • Less overall benefit to fish - Smaller populations, less productivity potential and diversity • Implementation and construction might cause temporary disruptions to access and circulation • Intensive use may reduce longevity of features and increase maintenance 12 Qp 5 202 F-4e� �2 I GrreRn-ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 2 �.v 4 r Barr- vso .00, :�., .r...•—^�.. ... � � �,., "`�k�""-r_. y+lw ,� ,a�4^ ..,.r^?�k. "� � �, a� �i1Yii'.�� m p _ y n m d a , v a �u C: PEABODY CREEK PILOT PROJECTS 13 -- w �. - ♦ .. r � t �..� «,,m �..�a.- �°�' ,ram �� .«16, i�« • ` f '� � w f «�f�4� '� � �` ^...�;d.� ..�� _� �� -J��. • r i.,�rc "' , ate, -'"�w. �'.., � r �.�. n •� s , ffi....� S 'i'�... r Y11' a .tea. n �.# '�. � • .. � - .. • i y4 ti yr. � .M 40 * r 4W # . �- Now w E a M +m C: PEABODY CREEK PILOT PROJECTS a ALTERNATIVE C: Peabody Creek Watershed with Advancement of Pilot Project(s) Select projects on a prioritized watershed that might include: development of educational programming, daylighting plan development, a regional facility at Park and Race, or a green streets project. Heat Map Analysis Results Community Benefit: varies by project Habitat Benefit: varies by project Water Quality Benefit: varies by project Implementation Feasibility: varies by project Total: varies by project Opportunities • Potential to emphasize education, daylighting, and/or water quality - Expressed interest of the City and other GLAC participants - Support City in meeting NPDES permit requirements • Asset benefits to community not realized • Ecological benefit for fish includes salmonids • Options for phased and scalable implementation • High educational benefit - Currently used for educational programming - Builds on established program • Strong support expressed by neighbors - Community group working on clean-up now • Most centrally located and accessible location - Existing trail system Qpp 5 15 F4e��-� I GrreRn-ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix FebrlaryI 22 Already connects to ONP Could connect to ODT Close to ferry, hotels and more • Barrier culverts under Front and First scheduled for replacement by WSDOT • Infrastructure barriers on lower reaches less extensive - Much of culverts under under parking lots • Connects with County GSI and other planned WQ projects • Needs attention and maintenance - Could improve aesthetics of underutilized properties and downtown core - Reinforces downtown redevelopment efforts - Increased traffic would help with safety concerns Constraints • Likely to require additional time for project selection and feasibility evaluation • Not ranked as top priority by GLAC - Heat map projects on Peabody Creek less popular (other than HS) - Some options not evaluated by heat mapping • Most severely degraded of sites under consideration • Feels unsafe and that may not change • Lower ecological benefit for fish than VC • More residents and unhoused people at risk of displacement from restoration efforts • Limited implementation funding available, possibly less likely to generate future funding • Full implementation would be costly and exceed current funding Qp 5 2 16 F4e��-�� I GrreRn-ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febrlaryl0 2 0WEMMINUSIMM Discussion Prompts: • Is this an acceptable range of project alternatives? If not, what is missing? • Which project(s) should be prioritized for implementation and why? • Other comments, feedback, and questions Q 55 17 p-Ae��-�'l I GrreRn-ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febrlarylm r —1 816 Second Ave, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98104 f utu re p. (206)343-0681 f. (206)709-8218 wise I futurewise.org November 8, 2021 The Honorable Francis Charles Chairwoman Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe 2851 Lower Elwha Road, Port Angeles, WA 98363 Re: GreenLink Port Angeles engagement Dear Chairwoman Charles, With the recent selection of Valley Creek as the focus for Phase II of GreenLink Port Angeles, we understand that the interests of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe must remain central in our approach as we move forward with the creation of a watershed master plan and the development of engineering plans with permitting to daylight the lowest reach. We greatly appreciate the ongoing contributions of the Elwha Natural Resource Department staff on the GreenLink Port Angeles Advisory Committee. In recognition of the Tribe's unique status and relationship to this landscape, we want to ensure that you have ample opportunity to participate in this planning process beyond the limits of that forum. We respectfully invite your input and guidance on the GreenLink Port Angeles project at the level and extent you prefer. A separate invitation for Section 106 consultation with the Department of Ecology will be forthcoming as the project parameters become more defined. Only through robust dialogue with the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe will the full potential and benefit of this effort be realized, and we hope to continue with meaningful engagement. We would be pleased to make a presentation on the status of the project to the Business Committee and to coordinate additional meetings if desired. Again, we thank you for your valued participation in GreenLink Port Angeles. AnrFAe��-�$ I GrreRn-ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February 1622 Sincerely, Susannah Spock Livable Communities Olympic Peninsula Project Manager Futurewise Port Angeles, WA (360) 912-2833 susannah@futurewise.org 2of2 p-a5eiA Ph FGfre2eF-ink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'arYW future Daylighting Feasibility g reent nk wise _jAssessment ° . Project • PROBLEM DESCRIPTION The lower portion of Valley Creek is conveyed in a culvert system between the outfall into the Valley Creek Estuary and 6th St.along Valley St. (Figures 1 and 2).The culvert system is approximately 2,100 feet in length and has been identified by WDFW as a slope barrier with a 33 percent passability rating.Daylighting the stream was the top-ranked project identified by the Port Angeles Greenlink Advisory Committee due to its potential to restore critical habitat,improve stormwater management,and provide education and mobility benefits to the community while building on previous watershed enhancement efforts.Multiple creek alignment options have been proposed for daylighting this segment of stream and several stormwater management opportunities were identified through desktop and field analysis in 2020 and 2021.The purpose of this project would be to complete a creek daylighting feasibility study that includes an assessment of stream routing alternatives from the terminus of the proposed Phase 3 projectjust south of W.2nd St.,to the Valley Creek outlet at the estuary,that considers stormwater management opportunities, fish passage requirements,pedestrian/wheelchair mobility and vehicle circulation,geomorphology and hydraulics,and potential project segmentation.The lower watershed is highly developed with many potential constraints that will also need to be evaluated such as current and planned commercial and industrial uses,utilities,existing storm drain infrastructure,and soil contamination. PROJECT HISTORY Valley Creek has been and continues to be the subject of significant interest for restoring habitat,removing barriers to fish passage, managing stormwater and providing recreational and educational opportunities.To date,several projects have already been implemented along the creek (Figure 1),including:the restoration of the Valley Creek Estuary,a"Phase 1"fish passage improvement project under Hwy 101,and a"Phase 2" project to restore and re-meander a portion of channelized creek.Additionally,a"Phase 3" project was developed and designed to improve fish passage in the upper portion of the Valley Creek Culvert,south of W.2nd St.,through the addition of baffles to an 800-foot segment of the culvert and a partial daylighting of the uppermost 500 feet of pipe. Phase 3 also included restoration of a section of the creek upstream of the planned daylighting.Phase 3 was not awarded construction funding,apparently because it did not fully address the downstream barrier and has not yet been implemented. PROPOSED STUDY The feasibility assessment will include the evaluation of multiple alternatives to identify the best alignment for the daylighting lower Valley Creek, downstream of the Phase 3 project design extents(Figure 1).The assessment will assume that the current project will extend approximately 750 linear feet from the outfall into the Valley Creek Estuary,upstream to W. 2nd Street and connect to the end of the proposed Phase 3 project. Since the Phase 3 project proposes to leave an 800-foot portion of the existing culvert in the ground,the developed alternatives will consider how the project would function with future daylighting projects.The assessment will consider two potential alignments that have been previously proposed,with the potential to identify an additional alignment during the assessment.The feasibility assessment will include a desktop analysis of available data,the development of alternative alignments and preliminary grading,a hydraulic study,a geomorphic study of the creek, evaluation of potential stormwater facility size requirements and locations,evaluation of mobility improvements,and an alternatives assessment that considers stream alignments,fish passage and habitat requirements, right of way requirements,stormwater management,and pedestrian corridor improvements.The studies will be used to evaluate the feasibility of the stream daylighting alignments and select the most appropriate alignment. Securing the land area required to daylight Valley Creek will require engaging with multiple private landowners and stakeholders due to the significant level of development within the lower watershed. It is anticipated that the feasibility of any alternative will be largely dependent on landowner willingness to sell and/or to provide easements for the proposed project.Therefore,to provide the advisory committee with the opportunity to facilitate these discussions early,and focus the efforts of the feasibility study,a two-part approach may be taken with two major milestones as follows: ■ Milestone 1 —After completion of the desktop review. Provide a brief email summary of preliminary findings to the advisory committee.This summary may include information regarding; number of potentially impacted properties, property ownership information,property land use information, number of potentially impacted structures,impacts to future development plans,stormwater catchment impacts,existing ground profiles,and major traffic implications.A virtual meeting will be held with the advisory committee to discuss the findings and potential next steps.At this point,the committee would have the opportunity to screen potential alternatives,engage with stakeholders, and provide direction on the alignments to be considered in the remainder of the study. ■ Milestone 2—After completion of the remaining tasks in the feasibility study.A virtual meeting will be held with the advisory committee to present the results of the studies and provide recommendations for the final project alignment. HERRERA TXeillb�G�re2e Link Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'ary 02 City of Port AngeleS Name:Valley Creek Daylighting Feasibility gt�erinkAssessment ; ,.°. Project • Ck rf 3 cca 1 prom ti � a F.SM ;;Ow 000 Feel Figure 1. Project Location and Historical Projects. Figure 2. Upstream Inlet to Lower Valley Creek Culvert. 74eV-N �G�re2e Link Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'arYW I S Name:Valley Creek fWture City of Port Angele Assessment Daylighting Feasibility ; ,.°. Project • ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENT TASK DETAILS Project Management Includes costs associated with invoicing and budget tracking. Data Review and Desktop Analysis This task involves the assimilation and review of available datasets and previous studies relating to Valley Creek and the project area.The purpose of this task is to identify project constraints,identify potential project stakeholders,inform the development of project alternatives,and support the subsequent tasks required for the assessment. Examples of datasets of interest include:topographic LiDAR datasets,as-built drawings for the culvert and estuary restoration projects, construction drawings for the proposed Phase 3 restoration project,GIS property ownership information,GIS utility mapping,existing utility and stormwater infrastructure plans,previous hydraulic and geomorphic studies,and available master plan studies. Geomorphic Evaluation This task will involve an assessment of the lower portions of Valley Creek.The work will draw upon existing studies and available information and will include a day of fieldwork to collect data along the lower reaches of Valley Creek.This task will help identify the appropriate channel cross section and morphology to be used for the reconstructed creek. Alternatives Development This task will include developing preliminary horizontal and vertical alignments and proposed surfaces for the two alignments previously proposed for the project,with the potential for a third alignment,if necessary.The proposed grading surfaces will be used to evaluate the space requirements for the daylighted channel and provide the necessary data for hydraulic modeling.A key element of this task will be developing alternative alignments that work with the various site constraints,including known utilities,existing roads,and property boundaries.The alternatives will consider how the current daylighting project will be compatible with future potential upstream daylighting projects. Alignment 1 —This alignment involves daylighting Valley Creek primarily along Valley Street,from the outfall into the Valley Creek Estuary to the end of the Phase 3 restoration project, near W.2nd Street.This alignment would likely require a permanent closure of portions of Valley Street.See alignment on Figure 3 for details. Alignment 2—This alignment would avoid daylighting along Valley Street by routing the creek through several properties owned by the Port of Port Angeles and the City of Port Angeles between the estuary outfall and the end of the Phase 3 restoration project, near W. 2nd Street.See alignment on Figure 3 for details. Alignment 3*—It is possible that a 3rd alignment or modification to Alignments 1 or 2 may be identified during the assessment work that may also need to be evaluated. Hydraulic Modeling This task will involve 1-D hydraulic modeling using HEC-RAS to characterize the performance of each proposed alignment alternative with respect to fish passage requirements for salmonoids and Pacific Lamprey,flow velocities,depths,sedimentation issues,and flooding risk. Model runs will be conducted using two flow rates;a 2-year event to simulate a geomorphically active bankfull discharge,as well as a 100-year event to characterize flooding risks.At this time,is assumed that hydrology data will be available from previous studies and/or regional regression equations,sufficient to complete this task. Stormwater Management Options Development This task will evaluate options for managing stormwater from adjacent surfaces in the study area,including options for constructing BMPs next to the stream alignment to maximize project benefits.The evaluation will include determining the type of stormwater BMPs that could be applied,the BMP size,and locations along the alignment.The intent of this analysis will be to provide a level of detail needed to evaluate whether stream alignment alternatives are more or less compatible with stormwater improvement opportunities.Evaluation of more"regional"stormwater management opportunities,such as installation of stormwater facilities at outfalls,is excluded from the scope of this task but could be evaluated in a separate project. Transportation and Mobility Study Potential transportation and mobility impacts and opportunities will be evaluated and mapped relative to the stream realignment alternatives.The intent of this analysis will be to provide a level of detail needed to evaluate whether any of the stream alignment alternatives have greater traffic impacts or potential compatibility with mobility improvements,including the watershed loop trail and Olympic Discovery Trail. (6 HiFR RERA Ta�e��-�2�1�G�re2eLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February�02_2 future . g reent nk wise _j° Assessment rProject • Initial Acquisition and Easement Assessment Property ownership and willingness to sell or provide permanent easements will be evaluated in the study area.This will include outreach to property owners in areas where property acquisition or easements would be required to assess their willingness to sell their property or provide permanent easements to accommodate stream realignment. Cultural Resource Assessment This task will define an area of potential affect, evaluate cultural resources within that area, and complete a cultural resource assessment report. Alternatives Assessment The purpose of this assessment is to identify the most suitable project alignment for the daylighting the lower portion of Valley Creek and identify other key considerations for project implementation. Each alternative will be compared using a decision-matrix style assessment with criteria to identify the pros and cons of each developed alternative alignment.The criteria developed for this assessment would incorporate the project and community goals as well as known project constraints such as fish passage and habitat requirements,right of way requirements,traffic implications, impacts to existing buildings,mobility improvement opportunities,stormwater management opportunities, known utility and cultural resource conflicts,known or suspected soil contamination, property owner willingness to sell,and hydrologic and geomorphic considerations. Relative cost considerations between the alternatives will be discussed in the alternatives assessment, however planning level project costs estimates have not been included in the study at this time.The results from this task will be summarized in an assessment report. Reporting A report will be provided documenting the work conducted for the feasibility assessment and the key findings.As a part of this report,concept-level engineering sketches for the preferred alternative alignment will be developed,sufficient for discussions with project stakeholders or future grant applications for additional design work. Hr"Mr R Ta�e��-�2�3�G�re2eLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix February�02� I S Name:Valley Creek Daylighting Feasibility flure City of Port Angele Assessment g reentink wise .JI Project Summary Sheet Estimated Cost:$84,250 alififiami" COST ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS The costs estimate developed for this feasibility assessment was based on similar feasibility assessments with comparable task efforts.The estimate includes an assessment up to 3 proposed alignments.The estimate assumes that sufficient utility location data can be made available and that no additional survey work is required. Relative project cost considerations between alternatives will be discussed as a part of the decision framework but planning level cost estimates have not been planned for at this stage of the project. PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE Task Schedule Year 1 Months 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Project Management x x x x x Data Review and Desktop Analysis* x Geomorphic Evaluation x Alternatives Development x x x Transportation and Mobility Study x x x Initial Acquisition and Easement Assessment TBD TBD TBD TBD Cultural Resources Assessment x x x Hydraulic Modeling x x Alternatives Assessment x x Reporting x *Schedule assumes no delays to start Alternatives Development task after Milestone 1. FIFR RA P'a5ei�-'i�2�4�G�re2e Link Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'aryIR29 � 1 q, w . W Front f R w a . IT Ow : 1 • W 1st St I 1 Wr- 1 � W 2nd -t 1 OR ♦ �? M. ♦ � 1 � L �- Alignments will connect to the W 3rd St °- modified culvert section from the St, modified U) proposed Phase 3 Project Iw a s U) Legend Figure 3. Daylighting Alignment 1 Valley Creek Daylighting Feasibility �Daylighting Alignment 2 Assessment: Project Alignments.-*. Phase 3 Designed Project . w,a 0 75 150 300 Existing Storm Drain 0 Feet APN Boundary a Study Area 11 @' E R R E R A _ i b Evaluate Stormwater ciauam county,city of Port Angeles Improvement Opportunities �I +Tz: K\Pruj—\Y2019\1-7050000\Pru\VzlleyCreek\VzlleyCreek.zprs p-aWA-&�G9 nLink Port Angeles Phase 1 Summary Report Appendix Febr'arylkl END OF DOCUMENT April 5, 2022 1 - 152 CLALLAM | JEFFERSON | KITSAP STIGMA of substance addiction NOVEMBER 2021 IN PARTNERSHIP WITH COLLABORATIVE CONSULTING Becoming a Recovery Friendly Region Land Acknowledgement Together, we acknowledge, with humility, the indigenous peoples whose presence permeates the waterways, shorelines, valleys, and mountains of the Olympic region. The land where we are is the territory of the Coast Salish Peoples, in particular the Chimacum, Hoh, Makah, S’Klallam, Suquamish, and Quileute tribes on whose sacred land we live, work, and play. FOSTER A REGION OF HEALTHY PEOPLE, THRIVING COMMUNITIES PURPOSE Tackling health issues that no single sector or Tribe can tackle alone MISSION To solve health problems through collaborative action HEALTHY PEOPLE, THRIVING COMMUNITIES The Olympic Region The Olympic region includes Clallam, Jefferson, and Kitsap Counties. We are in the territorial lands of the Sovereign Nations of: •Hoh •Jamestown S’Klallam •Lower Elwha Klallam •Makah •Port Gamble S’Klallam •Quileute •Suquamish Reduced substance misuse & abuse Access to full spectrum of care Individual needs are met timely, easily, and compassionately Long-term, affordable, quality housing •Acknowledgements •Stigma overview •How OCH is responding •Current state •Path forward •How YOU can help •Resources Today’s agenda Acknowledgements Regional partners who contributed time and energy to informing this presentation Collaborative Consulting for their role in compiling and supporting the research Cambia Health Solutions for the funding to address this important topic What is STIGMA? Labeling Negative stereotyping Separating “us” from “them” Status loss and discrimination Power and stigma “An attribute that is deeply discrediting from a whole and usual person to a tainted, discounted one.” –Erving Goffman, 1963 STIGMATIZATION Stigma is multi-dimensional What contributes to and perpetuates stigma? DRIVING FORCES lack of knowledge lack of experience media portrayal barriers to treatment criminalization of drug use racism social and health disparities barriers to effective treatment intersecting stigmas increase the likelihood of negative consequences Contributing factors in rural communities Fragmented healthcare systems Limited transportation and longer travel distances Limited recreational infrastructure Fewer resources Limited employment opportunities Higher proportion of physically demanding jobs Social norms and social networks Addiction seen as a choice Assumed character flaws Social rejection Lost humanity Resistance to treatment services Self-stigma How does stigma impact communities? “Their value as human beings are diminished and their talents and role in the community is often overlooked because their substance abuse issues are in the forefront.” How does stigma impact your community? In groups of 2-4, spend a few moments sharing how stigma of substance use disorder impacts your community. Who is impacted? How are they impacted? How is the larger community impacted? How is OCH responding? Background research 2 interviews Key informants 10 community & provider groups Focus groups •Share results •Take action •Measure impact •Continue listening Compilation & analysis Literature review, analysis of available data 200+ respondents Regional survey Centering community voice 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Washington State Olympic % of population with identified substance use disorder (SUD) in the past year (2016-2018) Alcohol- induced deaths per 100,000 residents Prevalence of adult substance use Sources: 1.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 2.Washington State Department of Health Prevalence of youth substance use 8% reported smoking cigarettes 19% reported drinking alcohol 24% reported smoking e-cigarettes 4% reported using painkillers 10th graders across the Olympic region reported using the following in the past 30 days (2018): Sources 3. Source: Washington State Department of Health The Olympic region had the 3rd highest methamphetamine death rate in WA (2019-20). Opioid-involved deaths per 100,000 residents 120% 105% increase increase 2002-04 2018-20 3rd Death and crime data indicate increasing problematic use of opioids and stimulants like methamphetamine. 5. Source: Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute Sources: 4. Source: Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute 14.48 3.95 16.36 15.68 7.32 10.92 9.64 4.82 8.48 All opioids (2018-20)Heroin (2018-20)Methamphetamine (2019-2020) Clallam Jefferson Kitsap Washington 9.50 4.82 12.58 Deaths per 100,000 residents: Looking at drugs involved and rates across the Olympic region Statewide leading causes of opioid deaths (2020): 1.Cocaine & opioids & methamphetamine 2.Cocaine & opioids 3.Methamphetamine & opioids 4.Opioids & alcohol or benzos or barbiturates (no methamphetamine or cocaine) 5.Opioids (no methamphetamine, cocaine, alcohol, benzos, or barbiturates) 5. Source: Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute Sources 4. Source: Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) experience of stigma 1 in 4 AI/AN adults have identified SUD treatment need in the Olympic region Compared with other populations across WA state, AI/ANs experience •Higher rates of overdose deaths •Slower receipt of SUD treatment •Mortality rates increase at a faster rate Sources: 6.. Olympic Community of Health 7. Washington State Department of Health 8. Acevedo, A., Panas, L.,Garnick, D., Acevedo-Garcia, D., Miles, J., Ritter, G., & Campbell, K. COVID -19 COVID -19 has greatly exacerbated mental health needs. Limited broadband access continues to be a barrier to treatment and resources, especially during the pandemic. Constantly changing information and recommendations A few examples of challenges partners are faced Closing of some Tribal borders Extreme shortage in personal protective equipment Implementing telehealth in rural parts of the region Supporting the health and wellness of staff Increasing demand for behavioral health services Source: 9. Olympic Community of Health Access to treatment In the Olympic region, approximately1 in 2 adults 2 in 5 youth on Medicaid received the SUD treatment they needed From 2017-2019, the Olympic region improved opioid use disorder treatment from 34.8% to 52.7% Source: 6. Olympic Community of Health In different groups of 2-4, take a few moments to reflect on the quantitative data we just shared. What is something new you learned? What is something you’re curious about? Other reflections? What are your takeaways? 83% of respondents believe there should be a focus on addressing stigma of addiction of respondents believe stigma is a problem in the Olympic region 77% Common themes from those who do not think stigma is a problem and/or should not be focused on: A focus on stigma enables individuals with substance addiction The problem is not stigma but addiction and its impacts on the community Visible addiction and socially undesirable activities ruin the community Stigma is justified and people should be judged based on actions Would rather focus on getting people into treatment Would rather focus on more prevalent issues (mental health,housing, substance treatment and prevention) Shifting perspectives 49%72%47%76%21%employers will pass over them in favor of another qualified applicant 19%most people think less of them 18%most people would be willing to accept them as a close friend most people would be willing to date them most people would hire them to take care of their children if qualified most people would accept them as a teacher of children most people believe they are as trustworthy as other community members Perceived stigma of substance addiction Survey respondents believe… 90% 81% 75% 22% 17% 6% 6% 5% 3% Opioid pain killers such as oxycodone or heroin Cocaine, methamphetamine, and other stimulants Alcohol Tobacco Marijuana Sedatives PCP, LSD, and other hallucinogens Other Inhalents such as paint thinners and glue % of respondents selecting substance as a concern Which substances are the most significant concern in the Olympic region? Provider stigma Lower empathy and engagement towards people with addiction People with addiction treated with suspicion and judgement Provider reluctance and reduced competency to manage addiction Denial of care and barriers accessing care Ways provider stigma manifests in the health and social care delivery fields Judgement A client shared with me that a provider told them “yes, I could do this surgery for you, but then you would just keep using so what would be the point.” Rejection Patients come in with a lot of guilt,a lot of remorse ...And often what you'll hear is they've been rejected so often by the health care system, by other providers, by their family, by their friends, by their employers, that just to come through the door and ask for help is huge. De-humanized Their value as human beings are diminished and their talents and role in the community is often overlooked because their substance abuse issues are in the forefront. Expectations Assumption is that everyone has methods of escape, and everyone is expected to handle it. Vulnerability The stigma comes when people cannot hide addiction anymore. Then there is a judgement towards what is visible. There is less judgement for someone who can cover it up and still function. Weakness Up to a certain point alcohol is glorified as this great thing. For someone to admit they are addicted to alcohol is to admit weakness. In different groups of 2-4, take a few moments to reflect on the qualitative information we just shared. What is something new you learned? What do you have to add to the conversation? What is something you’re curious about? Other reflections? What do you have to add? REdisCOVERYA Program of Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic What’s going well? Social worker Law enforcement Navigators Case managers Existing harm reduction services Medication assisted treatment programs, Suboxone clinics Needle exchange programs Mobile behavioral health services Recovery housing services What’s going well? Port Gamble S'Klallamre-entry program Suquamish Tribe re-entry-restorative justice and listening circles Tribal re-entry programs What’s going well? Trainings for healthcare professionals, social service agencies, and community leaders Stigma Bias Cultural competency Racism Trauma- informed care Treatment of chronic pain Evidence- based addiction care & treatmentTrainings What’s going well? •Hargrove bill: 1/10 of 1% sales tax for mental health, substance abuse treatment, and to support court treatment programs •1115 waiver: Experimental projects to improve the Medicaid program •Various state and federal policies Policies What’s going well? In different groups of 2-4, take a few moments to discuss and share other policies, programs, and services that aim to reduce stigma? What are other examples of programs, policies, or services that aim to reduce stigma? Recovery friendly Olympic region Prevention TreatmentRecovery Relapse FOSTER A RECOVERY FRIENDLY REGION Where do we go from here? Where do we go from here? ADDRESSING DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH Residential withdrawal management facilities currently operating in the Olympic region Address the need for additional withdrawal management and stabilization services in the Olympic region and across the state. WITHDRAWAL MANAGEMENT Where do we go from here? Source: 6. Olympic Community of Health causes of addiction role of trauma understanding recovery harm reduction community resources “RECOVERY HERO” CAMPAIGN Where do we go from here? reduce stigma support health- serving workforce improve access to treatment POLICIES Where do we go from here? Training for health, social service, and law enforcement providers TRAININGS Where do we go from here? POSITIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT Where do we go from here? workforce opportunities for people with lived experience expand recovery communities host community recovery eventsPEER SERVICES AND SUPPORTS Where do we go from here? How can you help? use person-first language, remove stigmatizing language be kind and be aware of your own bias learn more about addiction and trauma-informed approaches support recovery models throughout the region support the positive development of youth and young people get involved in an OCH workgroup Take a moment by yourself to complete this form. How will you stay connected? What commitments will you take back? Now, share with one or two people that you haven’t spoken with yet today. Stay connected #RecoveryFriendly Talk about addiction with your kids Practice person-first language Host a training for your staff/team Make a new community partnership Host a discussion Let us know how you are tackling stigma! •Post on social media with #RecoveryFriendly •Email OCH@olympicch.org •Go to olympicch.org/stigma Thank you Questions? Resources Resource Link Olympic Region Behavioral Health Report shorturl.at/novE6 Determinants of Health Report olympicch.org/sdoh-report Determinants of Health Inventory olympicch.org/localdeterminantsofhealth OCH and Collaborative Consulting Stigma Reports olympicch.org/partner-resources (under category “stigma of substance addiction) •Models research •Current state desk research •Context from the background research •Perceived stigma scale results •Stigma background research •Strengths and ideas to reduce stigma Department of Health Behavioral Health Impact Situation Reports shorturl.at/dgyC0 Citations 1.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.(2020).2016-2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Age Group Tables.https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2016-2018-substate-estimates-substance-use-and-mental-illness 2.Washington State Department of Health, Center for Health Statistics. (January 2021). Injury Deaths –ACH and State Dashboards:Drug and Alcohol- Induced Deaths by Gender and ACH. Retrieved June 2021 from https://www.doh.wa.gov/DataandStatisticalReports/HealthDataVisualization/MortalityDashboards/ACHInjuryDeathsDashboards 3.Washington State Department of Health (2018). Healthy Youth Survey: 10th Graders 4.Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute. (2021, July 28).Opioid trends across Washington state.Retrieved August 2021 from https://adai.uw.edu/wadata/deaths.htm 5.Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute. (2021, August 4). Methamphetamine trends across Washington state.Retrieved August 2021 from https://adai.uw.edu/wadata/methamphetamine.htm 6.Olympic Community of Health. (2021).The Olympic Region Behavioral Health Report.https://ea40b83f-bff5-4a61-aa55- a97621e13e64.usrfiles.com/ugd/ea40b8_4348718198b743b88c9804f199a78c91.pdf 7.Washington State Department of Health, Center for Health Statistics. (January 2021). Injury Deaths –ACH and State Dashboards: Drug and Alcohol- Induced Deaths by Race and ACH. Retrieved June 2021 from https://www.doh.wa.gov/DataandStatisticalReports/HealthDataVisualization/MortalityDashboards/ACHInjuryDeathsDashboards 8.Acevedo, A., Panas, L.,Garnick, D., Acevedo-Garcia, D., Miles, J., Ritter, G., & Campbell, K. (2018).Disparities in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders: Does Where You Live Matter?.The journal of behavioral health services &research,45(4), 533–549. 9.Olympic Community of health. (2020, March 23). Challenges Faced Amidst a Pandemic. https://www.olympicch.org/post/challenges-faced-amidst-a- pandemic -;G� POR-T-ANGELES CITY COUNCIL WASH I N G T O N , u , S , MEMO Date: April 5,2022 To: City Council From: Nathan A.West, City Manager Subject: Clallam County Housing Solutions Committee Summary: Clallam County has created a Housing Solutions Committee and has requested City Council appoint one representative to be a voting member of the Committee. Funding:N/A Recommendation: 1.)Discuss the history of the Housing Solutions Committee and; 2.)Appoint a City Council or staff representative to the Clallam County Housing Solutions Committee. Background / Analysis: This past fall of 2021 Mayor Dexter and City Manager West and the Director of Community and Economic Development began attending meetings with Clallam County and our local housing providers to help advance area housing projects. These discussions culminated in many of the American Rescue Plan Act funding contributions towards housing in Port Angeles. On March 15,2022 the Board of Clallam County Commissioners passed a resolution converting this group into a formal County subcommittee. The purpose of the Committee is to develop programs to promote housing solutions in Clallam County. It is further intended that the Committee make recommendations to the Board of Commissioners on expenditures of the 1406 funds,American Rescue Plan Act Funds, Opportunity Fund infrastructure for housing and other funds that can be used for affordable housing. The County has established 20 member positions with one seat for a City of Port Angeles representative. Staff recommends that Council appoint a representative to the Housing Solutions Committee. Relevant County documents are attached. Funding Overview: N/A Attachments April 5, 2022 1 - 153 Board of Clallam County Commissioners 223 East 41h Street,Suite 4 Port Angeles,WA 98362-3015 360.417.2233 Fax: 360.417.2493 MARK OZIAS, District1, Chair E-mail:commissioners0co.clallamma.us RANDYIOHNSON, District 2 BILL PEACH,District 3 Rich Sill, County Administrator File: A22.26 PRESS RELEASE For Immediate Release CLALLAM COUNTY SEEKS VOLUNTEERS FOR HOUSING SOLUTIONS COMMITTEE March 16, 2022 - Port Anaeles, Washinaton —The Board of Clallam County Commissioners announces openings for the Housing Solutions Committee. HOUSING SOLUTIONS COMMITTEE (20) The Clallam County Board of Commissioners recognize the need to find innovative housing solutions in Clallam County. On March 15, 2022 the Board of County Commissioners established a Housing Solutions Committee under Resolution 32, 2022. The committee shall be responsible for developing programs to promote housing solutions in Clallam County. The committee will also make recommendations to the Board of Clallam County Commissioners and the Opportunity Fund Board for expenditures of 1406 funds, American Rescue Plan Act funding related to housing solutions, Opportunity Fund infrastructure for housing and other funds that can be used for affordable housing. The committee shall consist of 20 voting members, with one voting member from each of the following: Clallam County Commissioner, Clallam County Department of Community Development Director, City of Forks, City of Port Angeles, City of Sequim, North Peninsula Building Association, Sequim Realtors Association, Port Angeles Realtors Association, Peninsula Housing Authority, Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County, North Olympic Regional Veteran's Housing Network, Serenity House of Clallam County, Peninsula Behavioral Health, Olympic Community Action Programs (OlyCap), Healthy Families of Clallam County, Port of Port Angeles, Economic Development Council, Tribal Governments and At-Large. How to Apply Interested citizens are invited to contact the Clallam County Commissioners'Office at 360-417-2256, visit their office in the Clallam County Courthouse, 223 East 4th Street, Suite 4, Port Angeles, or obtain the application online at: http://www.claIlam.net/boards/index.htmI Applications must be received by close of business Thursday, March 31, 2022. 3:\public\A22 Committees and Organizations\3 Boards&Committees Press Releases\2022\B&C Press release March 2022 Housing Solutions Committee.doa April 5, 2022 1 - 154 RESOLUTION 3+ 2022 ll a �I 3 �� k ESTABLISHING THE HOUSING SOLUTIONS COMMITTEE THE BOARD OF CLALLAM COUNTY COMMISSIONERS finds as follows: 1. There is a need for additional housing in Clallam County. 2. Lack of housing is a barrier to attracting new employees and new businesses to Clallam County. 3. Lack of affordable housing is impacting the quality of life of many county residents. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Clallam County Commissioners, in consideration of the above findings of fact: 1. The Clallam County Board of Commissioners recognizes the need to find innovative housing solutions. 2. The Clallam County Board of Commissioners establishes a Housing Solutions Committee to be responsible for: a. Developing programs to promote housing solutions in Clallam County. b. Making recommendation to the Board of Clallam County Commissioners and the Opportunity Fund Board for expenditures of 1406 funds, American Rescue Plan Act Funding related to housing solutions, Opportunity Fund infrastructure for housing and other funds that can be used for affordable housing. 3. The Housing Solutions Committee shall be comprised of 20 members representing: • Clallam County Commissioner • Clallam County Department of Community Development Director • One representative of City of Forks • One representative of City of Port Angeles ■ One representative of City of Sequim • One representative of North Peninsula Building Association • One representative of Sequim Realtors Association • One representative of Port Angeles Realtors Association • One representative of Peninsula Housing Authority • One representative of Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County • One representative of North Olympic Regional Veteran's Housing Network • One representative of Serenity House of Clallam County • One representative of Peninsula Behavioral Health • One representative of Olympic Community Action Programs (OlyCap) • One representative of Healthy Families of Clallam County • One representative of United Way of Clallam County • One representative of Port of Port Angeles • One representative of Economic Development Council • One representative of Tribal Governments • One representative of At-large PASSED AND ADOPTED this ,+411IIdill .- day of 1J1�C - 2022 BOARD OF C LLAM CO CQMMISSIONERS n Mark Ozias, air e� r %TT Randy John n ni Gores, CMC, Clerk of the Board Bill Peach 3:\public\Resolutions\2022\Housing Solutions Committee establishment.docx April 5, 2022 1 - 155 tfM POR-T-ANGELES CITY COUNCIL WASH I N G T o N , u , s , MEMO Date: April 5,2022 To: City Council From: Karl Martinez-Bailey, City Clerk Emma Bolin, Interim Director of Community and Economic Development Subject: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Appointments Summary: The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC)is composed of nine members. On February 4,2020, City Council appointed an ad hoc committee to review applications of those interested in serving on the committee, and to make a recommendation to the full Council on member appointments. Funding: Members serve without compensation. Recommendation: 1)Appoint Donya Alward as a Tax Collector and Christina Loewe as a Tax Recipient on the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee for terms ending 2/28/2024; and 2) Consider the recommendation of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee's application review committee recommendation to appoint,Darlene Clemens,Alyssa Imming, and Roselyn Mangohig to the three vacant member-at-large positions; and 3) Should the Council wish to appoint Darlene Clemens,Alyssa Imming, and or Roselyn Mangohig, staff are requesting they are assigned to one of the two different terms identified in the chart below: Vacant Member-at-Large 3/l/2021-2/28/2023 Vacant Member-at-Large 3/l/2021-2/28/2023 Vacant Member-at-Large 3/l/2022-2/28/2024 Background / Analysis: The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC)makes recommendations to the City Council on matters related to lodging tax, as required by the State Statute. LTAC is composed of the following nine members, as outlined in Port Angeles Municipal Code Chapter 2.70.030: 1. One City Council member. 2. Two members who are representatives of businesses required to collect lodging excise tax. 3. Two members who are persons involved in activities authorized to be funded by lodging excise tax revenue. 4. Three citizen-at-large members who neither represent businesses required to collect the lodging excise tax nor are persons involved in activities authorized to be funded by the lodging excise tax. The three citizen-at-large members shall be non-voting members. 5. One member who is a representative of the Port Angeles Forward Committee,who shall be a non-voting member. April 5, 2022 1 - 156 On February 4,2020,the City Council appoint an Ad Hoc Committee,comprised of Deputy Mayor Carr, Council members French and McCaughan. They have been tasked to review applications for the Committee and make recommendations on appointment. 5 applications were received and can be located here: https:Hciiyofpa.us/DocumentCenter/View/11255/03032022-LTAC-Application-Packet The Committee has the following members with the listed terms: Mike French-Chair Council Rep I/1/2022-12/31/2023 Donya Alward Tax Collector 3/l/2020-2/28/2022 Sydney Rubin Tax Collector 3/l/2021-2/28/2023 Christine Loewe Tax Recipient 3/l/2020-2/28/2022 Marsha Massey Tax Recipient 3/l/2021-2/28/2023 Vacant PA Forward Rep 3/l/2022-2/28/2024 Vacant Member-at-Large 3/l/2021-2/28/2023 Vacant Member-at-Large 3/l/2021-2/28/2023 Vacant Member-at-Large 3/l/2022-2/28/2024 To improve continuity on the Committee,on October 15,2019, City Council voted to extend terms to two-year terms. In order to make the terms overlap, some members have been given one-year terms. This will prevent the entire Committee's terms to expire the same year. Funding Overview: N/A. Attached: Applications April 5, 2022 1 - 157 POR-T-ANGELES CITY COUNCIL WASH I N G T O N , U . S . MEMO Date: Apri15,2022 To: City Council From: Karl Martinez-Bailey, City Clerk Emma Bolin, Interim Director of Community and Economic Development Subject: Planning Commission Appointment Summary: The Planning Commission is comprised of seven positions. Due to one resignation in the fall of 2021,there is one vacancy remaining. Funding: Members serve without compensation. Recommendation: Appoint Tammy Dziadek to the Planning Commission for an unexpired term ending February 28,2023. Background / Analysis: The Planning Commission is comprised of seven positions. Due to one resignation in the fall of 2021,there is one vacancy remaining. On February 4,2020, Deputy Mayor Meyer and Council members Schromen-Wawrin and Suggs were assigned to an ad hoc committee to review applications for the Planning Commission in order to make a recommendation to the Council on appointments. Beginning in January 2022, staff advertised for the positions on the Commission. The City received 7 applications and provided those to the ad hoc committee for their review. Applications can be viewed here: htlps://www.cilyofpa.us/DocumentCenter/View/I 12 1 O/Combined-Application-Packet-for-Planning- Commission The ad hoc committee recommended the re-appointment of Andrew Schwab and Ben Stanley and on March 1, City Council re-appointed Ben Stanley and Andrew Schwab to the Planning Commission for 4- year terms. In their message to the Clerk,the committee stated they needed additional time to decide on the remaining vacant position. After careful consideration,the committee has recommended the appointment of Tammy Dziadek to fill the remaining vacancy on the Commission for an unexpired term ending February 28,2023. The Committee has the following members with the listed terms: Chair Ben Stanley 3/l/2022-2/28/2026 Vice-Chair Andrew Schwab 3/l/2012-2/28/2026 Position I Marolee Smith 3/l/2021-2/28/2025 Position 4 Vacant 3/1/2019-2/28/2023 Position 5 Colin Young 3/l/2019-2/28/2023 Position 6 Richie Ahuja 3/l/2020-2/29/2024 Position 7 Steve Luxton 3/l/2020-2/29/2024 Funding Overview: Members serve without compensation. April 5, 2022 1 - 158 .;G� POR-T-ANGELES CITY COUNCIL WASH I N G T O N , U.S, MEMO Date: April 5,2022 To: City Council From: Nathan A.West, City Manager Subject: Appoint Ad Hoc Committees Summary: Over the course of the year, advisory board seats are vacated here and there. Staff are recommending Council appoint members to an ad hoc committee(s)in order to review applications and make recommendations to the full Council. A shared process is a consistent approach to the Port Angeles Municipal Code. Funding:N/A Recommendation: Appoint ad hoc committee(s)to review applications and make recommendations to the full Council on various appointments as needed. Background / Analysis: From time to time, advisory boards receive resignations from appointed members. To help in those times when new appointments need to be made, staff are recommending Council appoint Council members to an ad hoc committee(s)in order to review applications and make recommendations to the full Council. On September 5,2017,the City Council adopted Ordinance 3588, amending chapter 2.40,2.68, and establishing a new Chapter 2.25 which outlined the process of appointments and terms. In addition, Council adopted Ordinance 3638 amending portions of Chapter 2.70 of the Port Angeles Municipal Code relating to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee term and term limits. The process of appointment varies from committee to committee. Advisory boards,including the Public Safety Advisory Board and the Parks,Recreation and Beautification Committee,have their own process for reviewing applications for potential members. Once their board and committee members have made a decision on appointment,their recommendation is forwarded to the full Council for consideration. The Planning Commission and Lodging Tax Advisory Committee applications do not have a current process and could be reviewed by a Council ad hoc committee for appointment recommendation. There has been interest by both Council and staff to improve the process and it has been placed on the list of Council priorities for the code audit process. During the February 4,2020 meeting,Manager West brought the matter before Council and Mayor Dexter asked for volunteers to serve on the committees. Manager West clarified the subcommittees would be forwarding their recommendations to the Council for approval. That evening council appointed Deputy Mayor Meyer, and Council members Schromen-Wawrin and Suggs,to serve a two-year term on an ad hoc subcommittee to review appointments to the Planning Commission. In addition, Council appointed Council members Carr,French, and McCaughan,to serve a two-year term on an ad hoc subcommittee to review appointments to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. Funding Overview: N/A April 5, 2022 1 - 159